Agenda packet — Clayton City Council, March 18, 2025

Jeff Wan, Vice Mayor Jim Diaz, Councilmember
Holly Tillman, Councilmember Richard G Enea, Councilmember

1. CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
(a) Approval of the March 4, 2025, Meeting Minutes
(b) Resolution Directing the Preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Diablo Estates Benefit Assessment District

5. RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
(a) Certificates of Recognition to Public School Students for Exemplifying the "Do the Right Thing" Character Trait of "Self-Discipline" During the Months of January and February 2025

6. REPORTS
(a) City Manager/Staff
Link to ClearGov Transparency Portal: https://cleargov.com/california/contracosta/city/clayton/checkbook

CLAYTON CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 18, 2025
7:00 PM
Hoyer Hall, Clayton Community Library
6125 Clayton Road, Clayton, CA 94517
Kim Trupiano, Mayor
(View)
(View)
(View)
Agenda March 18, 2025
1 (b) City Council / Committees

7. PUBLIC HEARINGS

8. ACTION ITEMS
(a) Receive Report on Mid-Year Budget
(b) Biennial Pavement Assessment Report and 2026 Paving Project Street Selection
(c) Pilot Sidewalk Repair Program for Assisting Fronting Property Owners

9. ADJOURNMENT
(View)
(There are no Public Hearings scheduled for this meeting) (View)
(View)
(View)
The next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council will be April 1, 2025. For meeting information and materials, please visit the City's website at www.claytonca.gov.

Agenda March 18, 2025
2 Meeting Information and Access
A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each public item is available for public review in City Hall located at 6000 Heritage Trail and on the City’s website at www.claytonca.gov
Agendas are posted at: 1) City Hall, 6000 Heritage Trail; 2) Library, 6125 Clayton Road; 3) Ohm’s Bulletin Board, 1028 Diablo Street, Clayton; and 4) City Website at www.claytonca.gov Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet and regarding any public item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office located at 6000 Heritage Trail during normal business hours and is available for review on the City’s website at www.claytonca.gov If you have a physical impairment requiring special accommodation to participate, please call the City Clerk’s office at least 72 hours (about 3 days) before the meeting at (925) 673-7300.

E-mail Public Comments: Public comment may also be sent to the City Clerk at [email protected] by 5:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. All e-mailed public comments will be forwarded to the entire committee and made part of the official meeting file.

Each person attending the meeting in-person, via videoconference, or call-in and who wishes to speak on an agendized or non-agendized matter (within the council’s jurisdiction), shall have a set amount of time to speak as determined by the Mayor.

Agenda March 18, 2025
3 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Stephanie Cabrera-Brown, City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager DATE: March 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Approval of the March 4, 2025, Meeting Minutes Agenda Item: 4.a

STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Please see attachment.

BACKGROUND
The City Council reviews and approves the meeting minutes from the previous meeting.

FISCAL IMPACTS
N/A
CEQA
N/A

ATTACHMENTS
Minutes 030425 - Draft.pdf
4 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Minutes March 4, 2025 Page 1

MINUTES
OF THE

REGULAR MEETING

CLAYTON CITY COUNCIL

TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 2025

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL – The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Trupiano held in-person, and broadcast from Hoyer Hall, Clayton Community Library, 6125 Clayton Road, Clayton, California. Councilmembers present: Councilmembers: Diaz, Enea, Vice Mayor Wan, and Mayor Trupiano.

Councilmembers excused: Councilmember Tillman. Staff present: Assistant City Manager, Regina Rubier; Interim Community Development Director, Farhad Mortazavi; City Attorney, Malathy Subramanian; City Clerk, Stephanie CabreraBrown.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Led by Mayor Trupiano

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
Members of the public may address the City Council on non-agendized items within the Council’s jurisdiction. To ensure an orderly meeting and an equal opportunity for everyone, each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes, or the time established by the Mayor. In accordance with State Law, no action may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. The Council may respond to statements made or questions asked or may at its discretion request staff to report back at a future meeting concerning the matter.

Public comment and input on other agenda items will be allowed when each item is considered by the Council.

There were no members of the public wishing to speak to non-agenda items.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Vice Mayor Wan and seconded by Councilmember Diaz, to approve Consent Calendar Items 4(a) - 4(c) as amended to make clerical edits. (Passed 4/0; Excused: Councilmember Tillman)
(a) Approval of the February 18, 2025, Meeting Minutes. 5 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Minutes February 18, 2025 Page 2
(b) Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Prime Time Entertainment, Inc for Promotor and On-site Coordinator Services for the 2025 Concerts in the Grove Series. Contract 2025-1 (c) Acceptance of the 2024 General Plan Implementation and Housing Element Annual Progress Report
Following discussion by the City Council, Mayor Trupiano opened the Consent Calendar to public comment: There were no members of the public wishing to speak to the Consent Calendar.

5. RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
(a) Unsung Hero for the Month of February.

Mayor Trupiano Presented the Unsung Hero Award to Paul Jordan for his dedication to the Clayton Community.

Mr. Jordan thanked the council and community for the opportunity to serve.

6. REPORT
(a) City Manager / Staff
• Link to ClearGov Transparency Portal:
https://cleargov.com/california/contra-costa/city/clayton/checkbook Regina Rubier, Assistant City Manager, shared an update on the February 25th Planning Commission, All-hands staff meeting, shared that the City Manager scheduling meetings with Maintenance and Police Department staff, provided an update on budget and recruitment activities. (b) City Council / Committees
Reports provided as an attachment to the agenda.

Following discussion by the City Council, Mayor Trupiano opened the Reports to public comment: There were no members of the public wishing to speak to the Reports.

7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(There were no Public Hearings scheduled for this meeting.) 6 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Minutes February 18, 2025 Page 3

8. ACTION ITEM(S)
(a) Authorize Execution and Recordation of the Noise Abatement Agreement for Oakhurst Golf Course Maintenance Activities.

Regina Rubier, Assistant City Manager, provided an overview of the Noise Abatement Agreement for Oakhurst Golf Course Maintenance Activities.

Following discussion by the City Council, Mayor Trupiano opened the item to public comment:

Brian Wiesendanger – Spoke regarding concerns with the times approved in the agreement and Oakhurst’s maintenance activities.

Pam Wiesendanger - Congratulated Paul Jordan on his award and spoke regarding the times approved in agreement, the inclusion of the neighborhood in future surveys regarding noise complaints.

Brian Kreft – Spoke regarding the layout of the golf course and the noise agreement.

It was moved by Vice Mayor Wan and seconded by Councilmember Diaz to Authorize Execution and Recordation of the Noise Abatement Agreement for Oakhurst Golf Course Maintenance Activities as amended to:
• Add a phone number to where complaints can be made to section 3 • Modifying Section 4 to read “…complaints that are not promptly resolved”
(Passed 4/0; Excused: Councilmember Tillman)

9. ADJOURNMENT – on a call by Mayor Trupiano, The City Council adjourned its meeting at 7:42 p.m.

Please note the Minutes of this meeting set forth all actions taken by the City Council on the matters stated, but not necessarily in the chronological sequence in which the matters were taken up.
***
7 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Larry Theis, General Manager
DATE: March 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Resolution Directing the Preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Diablo Estates Benefit Assessment District
Agenda Item: 4.b

STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution Directing the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report for the Diablo Estates Benefit Assessment District.

BACKGROUND
At the request of the developer of the Diablo Estates residential project, the City Council (by approval of Resolution 04-2012 on February 7, 2012) formed the Diablo Estates Benefit Assessment District (“District”) in accordance with the requirements of the Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972 and the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982. The purpose of the District is for private property owners to be assessed annually to fund the annual maintenance of the various subdivision improvements constructed as part of the residential project that are of benefit to the properties within the subdivision. The initial Engineer’s Report and benefit assessment was prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved via a Proposition 218 ballot election by the property owners as required by law. The District was formed allowing the maximum annual assessment rates to increase annually based on the San Francisco Bay Area Consumer Price Index (“CPI”).

Although the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 does not require further action prior to levying the annual assessment if the assessment rates are not increased (other than any preauthorized adjustment due to a CPI increase), the Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972 does require the filing and approval of an annual Engineer’s Report prior to levying an annual assessment.

For the purpose of continuing to levy annual assessments on the property owners, the City Council initiates the process by calling for preparation of an annual Engineer’s Report. After adoption of this Resolution, the next step will be for the Engineer of Work (City Engineer) to 8 submit, and the City Council to review and then accept, the Engineer’s Report for this District.

Following that submittal and action by Council, will be a public hearing (with property owners’ advance notification) prior to formally setting next year’s assessments in sufficient time to be levied and collected on the County’s Fiscal Year 2025-2026 secured property tax bills.

DISCUSSION
This is the first step to initiate the process for setting the annual assessments on the properties within the Diablo Estates subdivision for landscape and weed abatement services which are collected through the property taxes collected by the County.

FISCAL IMPACTS
None to the City. As designed and approved, all expenses associated with the subdivision improvements, maintenance, operation, and repair are borne by the property owners of the District.

CEQA
None

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution Directing the Filing of Annual Engineer's Report for Diablo Estates Benefit Assessment District.docx
9 Resolution No. __-2025 Page 1 of 2 March 18, 2025
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2025
A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE FILING OF AN ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT

FOR THE DIABLO ESTATES BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972)

THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Clayton, California
WHEREAS, as requested by the Diablo Estates project’s property owners and by Resolution No. 04-2012 adopted February 7, 2012, the Clayton City Council formed the Diablo Estates Benefit Assessment District (the “District”) pursuant to both the Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972 and the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982; and WHEREAS, an initial Engineer’s Report was prepared by a registered civil engineer; and
WHEREAS, an initial annual assessment, along with an allowable annual rate increase in accordance with annual increase in the San Francisco-Bay Area Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), was approved by the affected property owner(s) in a Proposition 218 ballot election; and
WHEREAS, although the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 requires no further action to continue levying the annual assessment, the Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972 does require the City Council to direct the Engineer of Work to prepare an Annual Engineer’s Report prior to the levying of an assessment; and
WHEREAS, it is the City Council’s intent to commence said proceedings to ensure sufficient funds be assessed, levied, collected, and expended each fiscal year to fulfill the property owner’s obligation to properly maintain, operate and repair the associated Diablo Estates subdivision improvements as private property owner beneficiaries; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Clayton, California, does hereby resolve as follows:

1. There are no significant changes proposed to the improvements maintained by the District.

2. The City Engineer is hereby directed to prepare and file an Annual Engineer’s Report in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972.

3. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22622 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of Clayton, California, at a regular public meeting thereof held on the 18th day of March 2025, by the following vote:
10 Resolution No. __-2025 Page 2 of 2 March 18, 2025
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

THE CITY COUNCIL OF CLAYTON, CA
Kim Trupiano, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stephanie Cabrera-Brown, City Clerk
11 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Kris Lofthus, City Manager
DATE: March 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Certificates of Recognition to Public School Students for Exemplifying the "Do the Right Thing" Character Trait of "Self-Discipline" During the Months of January and February 2025
Agenda Item: 5.a

STAFF REPORT

BACKGROUND
Recognition of Public School Students for Exemplifying the “Do the Right Thing” Character Traits.

FISCAL IMPACTS
n/a
CEQA
n/a
12 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Stephanie Cabrera-Brown, City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager DATE: March 18, 2025
SUBJECT: City Council / Committees
Agenda Item: 6.b

STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Councilmember Diaz:

No report submitted.

Councilmember Enea:

Attended the Mayors Conference in Lafayette.

Attended the Black Diamond Homeowners Association meeting.

Met the Retired Public Employees Association meeting.

Attended the TRANSPAC meeting.

Met in person and on phone with various Clayton residents regarding city questions.

Councilmember Tillman:

February 27 attended League of CA Cities East Bay Division Board Meeting and general meeting with a legislative priority update from our Assemblymembers and Senators.

February 28 attended Choice in Aging's (CiA) annual crab feed which helps raise funds for adult day health care for seniors and disabled adults in our county. CiA provides respite for caregivers and helps keep them age with independence and dignity.

March 3 attended Mt. Diablo Education Foundation (MDEDF) Board of Directors Meeting. We will be hosting our 3rd annual bocce tournament at the Ipsen Family Bocce Courts on May 3rd from 9:30 am- 5 pm. Proceeds from the tournament will help to provide educational enhancement programs to students across the Mt. Diablo Unified School District, including students at Mt. Diablo Elementary and Diablo View Middle School.

March 8 attended the Network of Care annual crab feed. If you're ever in need of a meal while sitting with your loved ones at the hospital, ask the nurse for a purple bagged lunch which is lovingly prepared by the Network of Care volunteers.

March 11 attended Clayton Pride Board meeting and future organizational planning.

Since our last meeting I have also discussed the following topics with numerous residents and/or staff: Firewise neighborhoods, weed abatement options such as goats on the hillside and larger fire breaks, updated fire maps, Trails and Landscape Committee meeting schedule, paving project updates and the using crack sealing, HCD and Housing Element compliance and delays, council governance training, council 2025 goal setting session and council priorities, and council meeting accessibility issues with 13 streaming.

Clayton Cleans Up returns on Saturday, April 19th, just in time for Earth Day, so if you have service work that your school or organization needs help completing, please begin recruiting volunteers to come out early to help beautify Clayton. More hands make light work! More details will be forthcoming as the event date nears.

Vice Mayor Wan:

Attended the Mayors Conference in Lafayette.

Discussions with residents.

Attended the March 17th Budget and Audit Committee meeting.

Mayor Trupiano:

March 5th Agenda setting meeting.

March 6th Meeting with Clayton Community Church re: 1027 Pine Hollow Court project.

March 6th East Contra Costa Habitat Conversancy Governing Board meeting.

March 6th Kris and I had a meeting with the Regional Vice President, Diamond Terrace.

Below is a
recap of what the Regional VP shared with us: Cost of amenities to residents was surpassing cost of rent ($1400-$1700 amenities vs. rent $1,200-$1,400/month) This was creating a number of vacancies as well as hardships on some families who were supplementing costs Facility is still 55+ community and 100% affordable. They are bringing in a full-time activities coordinator and will be offering their meeting spaces, including the dining room, to local community groups at no charge.

March 6th Afternoon Tea at Diamond Terrace, with Clayton Valley Village. As a volunteer myself, I attended the Tea to speak with some of the residents of Diamond Terrace about the benefits of CVV membership Clayton Valley Village was given an opportunity to speak with residents possibly interested in becoming members of CVV at an Afternoon Tea that day. CVV provides its members transportation for grocery shopping, medical visits and other appointments, as well as a vast number of social activities.

March 9th attended Celebration of Life Service for long time Clayton resident, Daniel DeSousa, at Clayton Community Church.

March 11th Clayton Community Library Foundation Annual meeting and board meeting.

March 15th attended Career Day at Diablo View Middle School.

March 17th, Budget & Audit committee meeting.

Distribution of sponsorship package materials to all local businesses for City Sponsored Special Events: deadline is March 31st.

Meeting with Kris Lofthus, March 11th and 18th.

BACKGROUND
The City Council provides a report of activities that took place between the city council meetings.

FISCAL IMPACTS
n/a
14 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Regina Rubier, City Engineer
DATE: March 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Receive Report on Mid-Year Budget
Agenda Item: 8.a

STAFF REPORT

BACKGROUND
The City’s Operating Budget for FY 2024-25 was developed on an annual basis. However, during the budgeting process, the City faced a leadership transition as the previous Finance Director had recently resigned. In response, the Interim City Manager engaged a consulting firm to prepare the annual budget, despite the firm having limited background information about the City’s financial history and operational priorities.

Tonight’s action includes a comprehensive mid-fiscal year review of the FY 2024-25 Operating Budget, as mandated by previous Council direction. City staff has conducted an extensive analysis of all municipal funds and operational expenditures from July 1, 2024, through January 31, 2025, approximately 60% of the fiscal year, to ensure financial stability and alignment with the city’s goals. Following this thorough review, staff has determined that no additional budget amendments are necessary at this time. This assessment reflects the City's commitment to responsible financial management and transparency while maintaining the services and initiatives essential to the community.

DISCUSSION
15 FISCAL IMPACTS
n/a
CEQA
None.

ATTACHMENTS
Staff Report Mid Year Budget review 03 13 2025 v2 (002).pdf FY 2024-25 Mid-Year Budget Presentation 03 17 2025 v3.pdf 16 City Council Agenda Item Page 1 of 4 March 17, 2024
Agenda Item 8.a

STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Regina Rubier, Assistant City Manager
DATE: March 18, 2025
SUBJECT: FY 2024-25 Mid-year Operating Budget Update

RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends that the City Council formally receive and review a report on the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Operating Budget. This report will provide an overview of projected revenues, planned expenditures, and key financial priorities for the remainder of this fiscal year. Additionally, it will outline the fact that there are not any significant budgetary changes, funding allocations for essential services, and strategic initiatives aimed at addressing the city's operational and community needs. The presentation of this report will allow the City Council to assess the financial outlook, ask questions, and provide guidance as necessary to ensure fiscal responsibility and alignment with policy objectives.

When the City Council reviewed and approved the FY 2024-25 budget on June 4, 2024, they recognized the need for additional oversight and accuracy. The Council’s practice is to conduct a comprehensive mid-year budget review to ensure the budget was both thorough and aligned with the City’s financial and operational needs. This review would serve as an opportunity to assess any discrepancies, make necessary adjustments and provide greater transparency in financial planning.
17 City Council Agenda Item Page 2 of 4 March 17, 2024
Tonight’s action includes a comprehensive mid-fiscal year review of the FY 2024-25 Operating Budget, as mandated by previous Council direction. City staff has conducted an extensive analysis of all municipal funds and operational expenditures from July 1, 2024, through January 31, 2025, approximately 60% of the fiscal year, to ensure financial stability and alignment with the city’s goals. Following this thorough review, staff has determined that no additional budget amendments are necessary at this time. This assessment reflects the City's commitment to responsible financial management and transparency while maintaining the services and initiatives essential to the community.

DISCUSSION
Included in this report is an update of the FY 2024-25 General Fund projection. This projection is conservative and incorporates all economic factors known to staff at this time, including projected cost increases associated with settled and unsettled labor contracts. This annual projection shows an anticipated result from ongoing operations with operational expenses exceeding revenues by approximately $342,835; a difference of approximately $58,000, of which is noted below .

The General Fund's operating revenues for this fiscal year are adequate to fully cover both regular operating costs and one-time expenditures without requiring deficit spending from ongoing operations. This financial stability ensures that essential services and planned initiatives can proceed without reliance on reserve funds. However, due to deferred maintenance on various city assets and infrastructure, some unexpected expenses have arisen. In response, the City Council has approved several unbudgeted expenditures and Budget
Year To
Date
(01/31/2025)
Year to
Date
Variance
Projected Year
End (June 30,
2025)
Revenue:

Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF 1,323,067 677,607 (645,460) 1,355,214 Property Taxes - Secured 1,305,423 623,431 (681,992) 1,246,863 Redevelopment Property Tax T 495,591 307,537 (188,054) 615,073 Sales and Use Tax 594,704 302,461 (292,243) 604,922
Other General Fund Revenue 2,092,278 1,616,328 (475,950) 1,988,991 Total Revenue 5,811,063 3,527,364 (2,283,699) 5,811,063 Expenses:

Salaries and Benefits 3,888,797 2,591,671 1,297,126 3,888,797 Services and Supplies 2,207,183 2,090,101 117,082 2,265,101 Total General Fund Expenses 6,095,980 4,681,772 1,414,209 6,153,898 Available for Fund Balance (284,917) (342,835)
City of Clayton
General Fund
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025
18 City Council Agenda Item Page 3 of 4 March 17, 2024
budget amendments through prior actions during this fiscal year. These additional costs reflect the necessity of addressing critical maintenance issues that, if left unattended, could lead to higher expenses in the future. Items include:
• Interior painting of City Hall (approximately $26,000) • Carpeting of City Hall (approximately $28,000)
Other anomalies found:
• Repair of the Library HVAC system (approximately $17,000) • Dues and Subscriptions (approximately $30,000)
• Library Phone (approximately $5,000)
• Legal – Police (approximately $7,500)
• Dispatch Services (approximately $24,000) – offset by departmental savings. • Professional Services (approximately $328,000) – offset by cost savings of vacant positions.

City staff will continue to keep the City Council informed of any significant economic impacts affecting the operating budget. Regular updates will be provided as necessary to ensure transparency and proactive financial planning. The next scheduled financial update will take place in May 2025 as part of the presentation of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget, where a comprehensive review of revenue projections, expenditures, and economic conditions will be discussed.

The most notable anomaly, although entirely expected, is the overage in the "Other Professional Services" expense accounts. These accounts reflect costs related to consulting firms and external suppliers who have been hired to fill gaps left by the shortage of internal staff. While these expenses have surpassed initial projections, they are effectively offset by the salary savings generated from vacant city staff positions. In other words, the funds that would have been allocated to those unfilled positions remain unused, helping to mitigate the increased spending on external services. As a result, even though the overage appears significant, it does not lead to any net negative impact on the overall budget. The budgetary balance remains intact, as the savings from staff vacancies effectively counterbalance the additional costs.

Furthermore, all other funds are exhibiting steady revenue and expenditure patterns, with these figures aligning closely with the projected estimates for the fiscal year. This consistent Date Description $
June 4, 2024 Adopted General Fund Expense Budget $ 6,040,686 November 17, 2024 Budget Amendement for City Hall Maintenance 55,294 Amended Budget Amount $ 6,095,980
Anomalies:

Library HVAC System 17,000
Dues and Subscriptions 30,000
Phone and Legal 11,000
Estimated Year End Expenses $ 6,153,980
19 City Council Agenda Item Page 4 of 4 March 17, 2024
financial performance highlights the accuracy of our initial forecasts and demonstrates the effective stewardship of resources. The continued stability in both revenue and expenses across these funds underscores our commitment to maintaining a well-managed and sustainable financial outlook, ensuring that we remain on track to meet our annual goals.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact with this action

CEQA IMPACT
There is no anticipated environmental impact with this action

ATTACHMENTS
None
20 2024-25 MIDYEAR

BUDGET REVIEW
21 PURPOSE
For City Council to accept the report out of the Mid-Year 2024-25 General Fund Budget Review
22 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
• City Council approved the FY 2024-25 Budget on June 3, 2024 • On November 17, 2024, City Council approved a budget amendment not to exceed $60,000 for the painting and carpeting of City Hall • 4.6 Positions at City Hall remain vacant and staffing is being supplemented by consultants and temporary services
• Any additional major purchases for FY 2024-25 will require Council approval and a budget amendment prior to June 30, 2025. 23 GENERAL FUND REVENUE
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
FY 2023-24
Budget
FY 2023-24 Actual FY 2024-25
Budget
Year To Date
(01/31/2025)
Projected Year
End (June 30,
2025)

5.7M 5.9M 5.8M

3.5M

5.8M
Revenue: Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF
Revenue: Property Taxes - Secured
Revenue: Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund - Distribution Revenue: Sales and Use Tax
Revenue: Other General Fund Revenue
Total Revenue
24 EXPENSES
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
FY 2023-24 Budget FY 2023-24 Actual FY 2024-25 Budget Year To Date (01/31/2025)
Projected Year End
(June 30, 2025)

5.7M

6.05M 6.1M

4.7M

6.2M
Expenses: Salaries and Benefits Expenses: Services and Supplies Total General Fund Expenses 25 BUDGET SUMMARY
FY 2023-24
Budget
FY 2023-24
Actual
FY 2024-25
Budget
Year To
Date
(01/31/2025)
Projected Year
End (June 30,
2025)
Revenue 5,683,916 5,904,558.00 5,811,063 3,527,364 5,811,063 General Fund Expenses 5,683,916 6,051,046 6,095,980 4,681,772 6,153,898 Available for Fund Balance - (146,488) (284,917) (342,835) 26 ANOMALIES
Expense Accounts In Excess of Budgeted Amount:
 $17,000 HVAC work at the Library
 $30,000 in Dues and Subscriptions
 $5,000 over budget for Library phone
 $7,500 over budget for Legal Expense for the Police Department  $24,000 over budget for Dispatch
 $328,000 Professional Services – offset by cost savings of vacant positions
27 BUDGET AUGMENTATION
• Interior painting of City Hall (approximately $26,000) • Carpeting of City Hall (approximately $28,000)
• Riding Lawnmower (approximately $75,000) – Capital Asset Fund 28 RECOMMENDATION
• Have the City Council receive the report and direct staff to start the FY 2025-26 budget process.
29 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Larry Theis, General Manager
DATE: March 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Biennial Pavement Assessment Report and 2026 Paving Project Street Selection
Agenda Item: 8.b

STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
The City Engineer recommends that the City Council receive the biennial 2025 Pavement Management Program Report for Clayton's Public Roadway Network and Provide Direction on Which Streets Should be Rehabilitated in the Next Paving Project Scheduled for the Summer of 2026.

BACKGROUND
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) coordinates with every Bay Area public agency which maintains a public roadway network to prepare a pavement condition report for their jurisdiction that is updated every two years. The visual assessment of the pavement condition is based on uniform inspection standards that quantify a qualitative assessment into a single pavement condition index (PCI) score for each street segment that ranges from 100 (best) to 0 (worst) using a program called StreetSaver. This data has been compiled for approximately 25 years. MTC provides a grant every two years that typically funds 80% of the cost of hiring an independent consultant that is certified to perform the road ratings and preparing a pavement management report for MTC. This pavement management report cost $18,000 with Clayton providing a $3,000 local match and MTC funding the remaining $15,000.

The City of Clayton has 42.4 centerline miles of publicly maintained roadways within its city limits; which is comprised of 5.8 miles of arterials, 9.0 miles of collectors, and 27.6 miles of residential roadways. The visual inspection by the independent consultant is typically performed in “even years” with the data being compiled and the report being published in the following “odd year”.

DISCUSSION
The current average PCI for the City’s network is 73. This report (Attachment 1) included the latest paving work performed last October 2024. The City’s network PCI was maintained above 80 through 2018 (85 in 2016, 82 in 2018) and dropped to 78 in its last inspection in 2022. This can be attributed to the insufficient maintenance and rehabilitation activities being performed in that time period. See Figure 2 on Page 5 of Attachment 1 - Pavement Report.

The City’s overall network is generally in a uniform condition with the collectors and 30 residentials rated at 73 with the arterials having a PCI of 71. Clayton’s network PCI of 73 is still considered in “Good” condition (PCI above 70) but it is trending downward for the past decade. StreetSaver estimates that the City needs to spend an average of $2.6 million a year in order to maintain its current PCI of 73. The network is projected to drop to 68 and into “Fair” condition (PCI 50-69) in the next five years based on the City’s current roadway funding budget of an average of $1.0 million a year.

Breakdown of annual funding sources:
$100,000 Gas Tax ($425K allocation - $325K for maintenance operations) $290,000 RMRA Gas Tax (Approved by SB1)
$310,000 CCTA Measure J (Return to Source from CCTA)
$300,000 Capital Fund (this is leftover unspent funds $1.2M avg/4 years) $1,000,000 TOTAL
The CIP currently budgets on average $1.0 million per year for paving projects in the next fiveyear window; however, this is inflated using previously unspent funds that have accumulated in the past few years. The City’s actual annual revenue collected for road paving projects is approximately $700,000 per year based on allocations from Gas Tax and CCTA Return to Source. See Figure 3 and Table 2 on Page 6 of Attachment 1 - Pavement Report.

Within the current CIP, the City has allocated approximately $2 million for its next paving project ($1.7M for construction costs and $300K for “soft costs” such as design, construction management and inspection, administration). The unit prices used in StreetSaver includes these soft costs. Therefore, when implementing different cost scenarios we are using the total budget, not just the estimated construction costs.

In general, allowing StreetSaver to select which streets should be rehabilitated based on your available budget will produce the optimal increase in the overall network PCI. But StreetSaver does not consider grouping streets into regions to reduce mobilizing costs, outside impacts such as school traffic or special events, or upcoming utility work that should be done before repaving a particular street. StreetSaver will generally prioritize roads that are rated in the 50- 70 PCI range since it is more cost effective to rehabilitate a road in good to fair condition than replacing a road in poor to failed condition since it is much more expensive to reconstruct a roadway versus applying a surface treatment. This will leave certain “worst” roads to continue to fall in rating or remain at the bottom since it will never be cost effective to be selected when an agency has a limited budget. Based on my prior experience, I recommend the City Council consider a percentage of the $2 million budget be allocated for certain “worst” roads and the remaining amount be selected by StreetSaver. Within the pavement report, Scenario 1A is allowing StreetSaver to select the entire $2 million budget; while Scenario 1B is based on a 50/50 split of the budget with $1 million to be used on specific roads selected by the City Council and the remaining $1 million based on StreetSaver’s recommendation. These are just two example scenarios. The City Council can provide direction on any scenario it would like to proceed with; for example; changing the $2 million budget, selecting streets for the entire budget, or any different percentage split between City selected and StreetSaver recommended streets. Other cost saving considerations would be to group streets by region/neighborhood and/or by type of rehabilitation work.

Additional items that should be considered in the street selection discussion:

1. Per Council direction from February 4, 2025 meeting - Allocate $200,000 (save $40,000 in 31 soft cost by incorporating into overall 2026 project) toward the Mountaire Parkway resurfacing and bicycle lane striping between Marsh Creek Road and Mountaire Circle (south – swimming pool).

2. Received public requests to repave and/or restripe Eagle Peak Avenue between Oakhurst Drive (east) and Keller Ridge Drive. The current PCI is 53 which recommends in-place recycling and overlay of pavement with an estimated cost between $700,000 and $800,000.

However, this location could be delayed further and allow the pavement to deteriorate another 10-15 points before repaving is considered since the proposed type of rehabilitation would still remain the same before needing an even more costly repair of full reconstruction.

3. The two lowest rated roads in Clayton are El Portal Drive (Regency Dr to El Pueblo Pl) with PCI of 36 and Main Street (Oak St to Marsh Creek Rd) with PCI of 40. They would need to be evaluated and tested to determine if an in-place recycling and overlay option would still be recommended or if a full-depth reclamation with thick overlay is needed to reconstruct the roadway. The cost difference is approximately 50% more for reclamation versus in-place recycling. For El Portal Drive the range of cost, depending on the recommended pavement rehabilitation would be $200,000 to $300,000 and for Main Street it would be $275,000 to $425,000. For Main Street, the City would also need to consider the impacts of the construction work to the downtown businesses.

4. The City Council should also consider its anticipated long-term roadway paving budget shortfall and consider developing new prioritization criteria going forward. As one example, restrict all future roadway paving budget to collectors and arterials to ensure the limited roadway work will benefit the most residents of the community instead of less used residential streets.

FISCAL IMPACTS
No specific fiscal impact with this discussion. The direction from this discussion with the City Council for this item will be used to update the upcoming Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2025-2026 to be approved in May/June 2025. The current budgeted amount for the 2026 Paving Project is approximately $2,000,000.

CEQA
None with this staff report.

ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT 1 - City of Clayton PTAP 2025 REPORT.pdf
32 1003 W. Cutting Blvd., Suite 110
Point Richmond, CA 94804
NCE Project No. 55.161.55
Final Pavement Management Program
Report
PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
City of Clayton
City of Clayton
Clayton City Hall
6000 Heritage Trail
Clayton, CA 94517
February 2025
33 Pavement Management Program Report
PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
City of Clayton
February 2025
Prepared for:

City of Clayton
Clayton City Hall
6000 Heritage Trail
Clayton, CA 94517
Prepared by:

Sampat Kedarisetty, EIT
Project Engineer I
Shahram Misaghi, P.E.

Associate Engineer
NCE
1003 W. Cutting Blvd., Suite 110
Point Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620
NCE Project No. 55.161.55
The preparation of this report has been financed in part by grants from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S.

Department of Transportation.
34 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Executive Summary City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
ES-1
Executive Summary
In 2024, Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. (NCE) was selected by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) to update the pavement management program (PMP) of the City of Clayton as part of the Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program, Round 25 (PTAP-25). This report summarizes the results of the 2024 update and its purpose is to help educate policy makers about the current condition of the street network and the impact of various funding scenarios on future network condition.

The City of Clayton is responsible for maintaining approximately 42.4 centerline miles of pavement, or 249 pavement sections, which represents a substantial investment of approximately $83 million. In 2024 NCE collected pavement condition data throughout the entire network using MTC distress protocols. Survey data were entered into the StreetSaver® database, which the City uses as a decision-support tool.

Overall, the City’s pavement network is currently in “Good” condition with an average pavement condition index (PCI) of 73. Approximately 66 percent of the street network is in “Good” condition with no streets in “Failed” condition.

The budget needs analysis indicated that the City needs to spend $26.5 million over the next five years to bring the street network to a condition that can be maintained with on-going preventive maintenance in the most cost-effective way. Four alternative budget scenarios were performed to illustrate the impacts of different funding levels. The following table lists each scenario with its corresponding five-year budget, the PCI, and deferred maintenance at the end of the analysis period. NCE recommends that the City pursue Scenario 3, which will increase the network PCI to 78 in five years while decreasing the deferred maintenance to $5.2 million. This scenario will increase the portion of the network in “Good” condition to more than 85 percent and eliminate all streets in “Failed” conditions. It will require $23.5 million over the next five years.

Scenario Description 5-Year Budget ($M) 2029 PCI 2029 Deferred Maintenance ($M)
1A
Existing Budget with no Project
Selection 5.0 68 25.2
2B
Existing Budget with Project
Selection 5.0 68 25.9
2 Maintain PCI at 73 13.0 73 16.6
3 Improve Network PCI by 5 Points 23.5 78 5.2
35 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Table of Contents City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary............................................................................................................................1 1 Introduction and Background.................................................................................................1 2 Network Summary.................................................................................................................3 3 Pavement Condition ..............................................................................................................4

3.1 City’s Pavement Condition Index .............................................................................................. 5

3.2 City's Network Condition Breakdown....................................................................................... 5

3.3 PCI Comparison with Neighboring Agencies............................................................................. 7 4 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies ............................................................................8 5 Budget Analyses ....................................................................................................................9

5.1 Budget Needs Analysis............................................................................................................ 10

5.2 Scenario 1A: Existing Budget with no Project Selection ($1.0M/Year on average)................ 11

5.3 Scenario 1B: Existing Budget with Project Selection ($1.0M/Year on average)..................... 12

5.4 Scenario 2: Maintain Current PCI at 73 ($2.6M/Year on average) ......................................... 13

5.5 Scenario 3: Improve Network PCI by 5 Points ($4.7M/Year on average)............................... 14

5.6 Scenario Comparisons............................................................................................................. 15 6 Conclusions and Recommendations......................................................................................18 List of Figures
Figure 1. Examples of typical City Streets with Different PCIs......................................................................4 Figure 2. Historical Network PCI and Treatment History since 2015 ............................................................5 Figure 3. Network Condition Breakdown by Functional Classification .........................................................6 Figure 4. Comparison of City’s Network PCI to Neighboring Agencies and Statewide Average...................7 Figure 5. Costs of Maintaining Residential Pavements Over Time................................................................8 Figure 6. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1A .............................................................................11 Figure 7. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1B .............................................................................12 Figure 8. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2................................................................................13 Figure 9. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 3................................................................................14 Figure 10. Comparison of Annual PCI by Scenario ......................................................................................15 Figure 11. Comparison of Annual Deferred Maintenance by Scenario.......................................................16 Figure 12. Comparison of Pavement Condition Breakdown by Scenario ...................................................17 36 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Table of Contents City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
ii
List of Tables
Table 1. Network Summary Statistics............................................................................................................3 Table 2. Pavement Condition Breakdown by Functional Classification ........................................................6 Table 3. Summary Results for Budget Needs Analysis................................................................................10 Table 4. Summary Results for Scenario 1A..................................................................................................11 Table 5. Summary Results for Scenario 1B..................................................................................................12 Table 6. Summary Results for Scenario 2 ....................................................................................................13 Table 7. Summary Results for Scenario 3 ....................................................................................................14 List of Appendices
Appendix A
Section Description Inventory
Appendix B
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree
Appendix C
Budget Needs Analysis Results
Appendix D
Budget Scenario Results
Appendix E
Sections Selected For Treatment: Scenario 1A
Sections Selected for Treatment: Scenario 1B
Appendix F
Quality Management Report
37 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Introduction and Background City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
1 1 Introduction and Background
In 2024, Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. (NCE) was selected by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) to update the pavement management program (PMP) of the City of Clayton as part of the Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program, Round 25 (PTAP-25). This report summarizes the results of the 2024 update and its purpose to help educate policy makers about the current condition of the street network and the impact of various funding scenarios on future network condition.

In general, PMPs are "designed to provide objective information and useful data for analysis so that… managers can make more consistent, cost effective, and defensible decisions related to the preservation of a pavement network.1"
The goals of the 2024 update were to:
• Update the existing pavement network inventory to include new streets, • Perform pavement condition surveys,
• Update historical maintenance records (e.g., previously resurfaced pavements), • Update the maintenance and rehabilitation decision tree and associated costs, • Perform budgetary analyses and determine funding needs, and • Prepare a final PMP report documenting the results of the update.

To update the City’s PMP, NCE performed walking condition survey in 2024 using the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's (MTC) modified2 ASTM D64333survey procedures for the entire network. Walking surveys were performed by one or two-person crews to record all pavement distresses. The surveys did not include non-pavement issues such as traffic, safety and road hazards, geometric issues, shoulders, sidewalks, curb and gutters, drainage issues, or immediate maintenance needs. All survey data were entered into the City’s StreetSaver® database, and pavement condition index (PCI) calculations were performed. NCE then met with agency representatives and reviewed and updated the City's decision tree including maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) strategies and treatment unit costs. A budget needs analysis was then performed, and four budget scenarios were analyzed for the street network.

This report answers the following questions for the City of Clayton (City):
• What does the City's pavement network include?
• What is the current condition of the pavement network? • What are the City's current M&R strategies?
• How much funding is required to perform all needed M&R treatments over the next five years? 1 AASHTO “Guidelines for Pavement Management Systems”. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, July 1990.
2 PCI Distress Identification Manuals (AC 4th Edition, PCC 3rd Edition), Metropolitan Transportation Commission, San Francisco, CA March 2022.
3 ASTM D6433-20 Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, www.astm.org.
38 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Introduction and Background City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
2 • What effect does the City’s existing funding have on the network condition and overall deferred maintenance?
• What effect will the best management practices have on the network condition and deferred maintenance?
39 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Pavement Condition City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
3 2 Network Summary
The City is responsible for maintaining approximately 42.4 centerline miles of streets (or 249 pavement sections). The network is composed of only asphalt concrete (AC) pavement sections.

Table 1. Network Summary Statistics
Functional Class Number of Sections Centerline Miles Lane Miles Network Area (%) Arterial 10 5.8 20.4 19.7%
Collector 25 9.0 18.8 22.3%
Residential 214 27.6 55.0 58.0%
Total 249 42.4 94.2 100.0%
The street network replacement cost is estimated to be approximately $83 million. This can be viewed as the value of the pavement network and is the amount needed to fund a reconstruction of the entire paved network.

The replacement cost is calculated by multiplying the total pavement area by the unit cost of reconstruction of the pavement structure. It does not include related infrastructure assets such as sidewalks, signals, markings, signs, or storm drains.
40 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Pavement Condition City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
4 3 Pavement Condition
Pavement condition is typically quantified using the pavement condition index (PCI), which ranges from 100 (best) to 0 (worst). Pavement conditions are affected by the environment, traffic loads and volumes, construction materials, and age. Figure 1 shows examples of streets with varying PCIs.

The PCI scale is divided into four general condition categories. Pavements in “Good” condition have a PCI above 70, pavements in “Fair” condition have a PCI between 50 and 69, pavements in “Poor” condition have a PCI between 25 and 49, and finally pavements in “Failed” condition have a PCI below 25.

Figure 1. Examples of typical City Streets with Different PCIs 41 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies City of Clayton Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
5 A list of all sections in the network along with their attributes, including the PCI at the time of last inspection, is provided in Appendix A. For convenience, two versions are provided – one sorted alphabetically by street name and the other sorted by descending PCI.

3.1 City’s Pavement Condition Index
The current average PCI for the City’s network is 73. This value is an area-weighted calculation performed in StreetSaver® and is based on the condition survey performed in 2024.

Figure 2 illustrates the City’s historical network PCI for the streets and treated lane miles by treatment types.

The PCI values shown were obtained from field inspection updates. The City’s network PCI was maintained above 80 till 2018 and dropped to 78 in 2022. This can be attributed to the lack of maintenance and rehabilitation activities in that time period.

Figure 2. Historical Network PCI and Treatment History since 2015

3.2 City's Network Condition Breakdown
Figure 3 breaks down the current street network PCI by functional classification. The average pavement condition for collectors and residentials is the highest with PCIs of 73 followed by arterials with PCI of 71. Table 2 summarizes the street network by condition category and functional classification. Approximately, 66 percent of the street network is in “Good” condition with no streets in “Failed” condition. 85 82
78 73
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
PCI
Treated Lane Miles
Surface Seals Overlay/Reconstruction PCI
42 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies City of Clayton Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
6 Figure 3. Network Condition Breakdown by Functional Classification Table 2. Pavement Condition Breakdown by Functional Classification Condition Category PCI Range Arterial (%) Collector (%) Residential (%) Entire Network (%) Good 70 – 100 11.8 15.6 38.1 65.5
Fair 50 – 69 7.9 6.2 18.4 32.5
Poor 25 – 49 0.0 0.5 1.5 2.0
Failed < 25 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 19.7 22.3 58.0 100.0
Arterial,
PCI = 71
Collector,
PCI = 73
Residential,
PCI = 73 43
PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies City of Clayton Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
7 3.3 PCI Comparison with Neighboring Agencies
Figure 4 shows the City’s average network PCI compared to neighboring agencies as well as the statewide average PCI from the 2022 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment4. As illustrated, the City’s network PCI is among the higher ones of the neighboring agencies and is 8 points higher than the 2022 statewide average.

Figure 4. Comparison of City’s Network PCI to Neighboring Agencies and Statewide Average 4 “California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment 2022 Update”. Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd., CA, 2022. 56 58
63 69 72 73 73 73
78 78
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
PCI
2022 Statewide Average PCI = 65
PCIs from the 2022 Statewide Needs Assessment
*Contra Costa County and Dublin PCI update from 2023 (PTAP 24) ** Martinez PCI update from 2024 (PTAP 25)
44 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies City of Clayton Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
8 4 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies
The City’s current M&R strategies include cost-effective preventive treatments. In general, slurry seals with digouts and crack sealing will be applied to pavements in “Good” condition; pavements in “Fair” condition will receive a mill and 1.5-inch thin overlay; pavements in “Poor” condition will receive a mill & thick overlay; and a surface reconstruction is performed when pavements are in “Failed” condition. The City’s M&R strategies are formalized into a decision tree5(presented in Appendix B), which is instrumental in performing the budget needs analysis and budget scenarios.

Experience and research have shown that it costs much less to maintain pavement in good condition than to repair pavement that has already failed. Figure 5 shows the treatment unit cost for residential streets that consist of 58.0 percent of the total streets network as an example. As shown, by allowing pavements to deteriorate, streets that once cost $23.00/square yard (SY) to apply a Microsurfacing may soon cost $54.00/SY to perform a CIR with a 2.5” AC overlay, or $82.00/SY to perform a 10” FDR-C with a 3” AC Overlay. In other words, delaying repairs can significantly increase M&R costs. Note that a Microsurfacing can be applied on approximately 3.5 times as many lane miles as those requiring a FDR-C and overlay for the pavements with failed condition.

Figure 5. Costs of Maintaining Residential Pavements Over Time 5 Note: The StreetSaver®
“Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree” divides the “Fair” condition category to separate pavements with primarily non-load-related distresses (e.g., longitudinal cracking) from those with load-related distresses (e.g., fatigue cracking).

Good
Fair
Poor
Failed
40% 75% 90%
Microsurfacing
$23.00/SY
Cape Seal or Microsurfacing or AC Mill & Overlay
$23.75-$39.00/SY
CIR with 2.5” AC Overlay
$54.00/SY
10” FDR-C with 3” AC Overlay
$82.00/SY
Percent of Pavement Life
Pavement Condition
Category
45 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
9 5 Budget Analyses
Based on the principle that it costs less to maintain streets in good condition than it does to repair those that have failed, cost-effective PMPs employ strategies that eliminate the deferred maintenance6 and then maintain the network with on-going preventive maintenance. Such strategies bring the network condition to an optimal PCI that can be maintained over time.

The first step in developing such a cost-effective strategy is to determine the total maintenance budget needs of the network. The next step is to conduct alternative budget scenario analyses. In consultation with the City, NCE selected and performed four funding scenarios for the analysis using StreetSaver® based on an inflation rate of

3.5 percent for an analysis period of five years:
• Scenario 1A: Existing Budget with no Project Selection - This scenario assumes the City will spend approximately $1.0 million per year or $2.0 million every other year on pavement M&R for the next five years based on recommendations from StreetSaver.
• Scenario 1B: Existing Budget with Project Selection - This scenario assumes the City will spend approximately $1.0 million per year or $2.0 million every other year on pavement M&R for the next five years with 50% of the budget allocated to pre-set list of projects to be performed and remaining 50% based on recommendations from StreetSaver.
• Scenario 2: Maintain current PCI - This scenario shows the budgetary needs to maintain the current PCI at 73 through the next five years.
• Scenario 3: Increase Network PCI by 5 Points - This scenario shows the investment needed to increase the network PCI by 5 points to 78 over the next five years.

The budget needs analysis and budget scenarios are presented in the following subsections. The detailed results of the budget needs analysis are provided in Appendix C. The detailed results of the budget scenarios are provided in Appendix D. Additionally, maps illustrating the current pavement condition and the projected 2029 pavement condition for each scenario are provided in Appendix E. 6 Deferred maintenance is M&R not performed due to insufficient funding. 46 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
10 5.1 Budget Needs Analysis
The total budget needs for the network represents the cost associated with performing M&R treatments at the optimal time – optimal meaning the PCI is maximized and the cost is minimized – over the analysis period. This was done by performing a budget needs analysis in StreetSaver® with an inflation rate of 3.5 percent for an analysis period of five years.

The results of the budget needs analysis are presented in Table 3. The total budget needs for the City for the next five years is estimated to be $26.5 million. Of the total budget needs, approximately $8.6 million (32.5 percent) is devoted to preventive maintenance, while the rest is allocated for rehabilitation and reconstruction treatments.

Table 3. Summary Results for Budget Needs Analysis
Year 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
Budget Needs ($M) 16.0 3.6 3.0 3.0 0.9 26.5
Treated PCI 81 81 80 81 79 NA
Untreated PCI 73 71 69 67 65 NA
If the City follows this ideal, cost-effective strategy, the average network PCI will immediately increase as a large amount of deferred maintenance is addressed in the first year and then decrease to 79. This type of budget, that addresses all the deferred maintenance in the first year, is known as front-loaded. Alternatively, if no maintenance is performed over the next five years, the network PCI will drop to 65 by 2029. 47 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
11 5.2 Scenario 1A: Existing Budget with no Project Selection ($1.0M/Year on average) This scenario assumes the City will spend $1.0 million per year for pavement M&R for the next five years with no pre-set selection of streets. As shown in Table 4 and Figure 6, the network PCI will decrease to 68 and the deferred maintenance will increase significantly to $25.2 million by 2029. Percent of the network in “Good” condition will decrease substantially to 36.3 percent while the portion of network in “Poor” and “Failed” conditions increases to 7.8 percent. A list of sections selected for treatment are provided in Appendix F.

Table 4. Summary Results for Scenario 1A
Year 2024
After Work
2025
No Project 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
Budget ($M) NA 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 5.0
Deferred
Maintenance
($M)

16.0 17.3 19.6 23.3 24.6 25.2 NA
Treated PCI 73 73 72 70 69 68 NA
Figure 6. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1A
$16.0
$17.3
$19.6
$23.3
$24.6 $25.2
73 73 72 70 69 68
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 2024 After
Work
2025
No Project
2026 2027 2028 2029 PCI Deferred Maintenance ($M)
Deferred Maintenance ($M) Treated PCI
48 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
12 5.3 Scenario 1B: Existing Budget with Project Selection ($1.0M/Year on average) This scenario assumes the City will spend $1.0 million per year for pavement M&R over the next five years while performing pre-set pavement maintenance projects. As shown in Table 5 and Figure 7, the network PCI will decrease to 69. Percent of the network in “Good” condition is reduced significantly to 34.5 percent while the portion of network in “Poor” will increase to 5.1 percent with no streets in “Failed” condition. This scenario assumes application of projects worth $1.0 million each in 2026 and 2028. A list of sections selected for treatment are provided in Appendix F.

Table 5. Summary Results for Scenario 1B
Year 2024
After Work
2025
No Project 2026* 2027 2028* 2029 Total
Budget ($M) NA 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 5.0
Deferred
Maintenance
($M)

16.0 17.3 18.8 22.5 24.6 25.9 NA
Treated PCI 73 73 72 70 70 68 NA
*
Includes scheduled projects worth $1.0 million each year Figure 7. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1B
$16.0
$17.3
$18.8
$22.5
$24.6 $25.9
73 73 72
70 70
68 0
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 2024 After
Work
2025
No Project
2026 2027 2028 2029 PCI Deferred Maintenance ($M)
Deferred Maintenance ($M) Treated PCI
49 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
13 5.4 Scenario 2: Maintain Current PCI at 73 ($2.6M/Year on average) This scenario aims to maintain the existing network PCI at 73 over the analysis period. As shown in Table 6 and Figure 8, the financial commitment required to accomplish this goal is $13.0 million over five years (or average $2.6 million per year). This will result in approximately 50.2 percent of the network being in “Good” condition with no streets in “Failed” condition. The deferred maintenance will increase slightly to $16.6 million by 2030.

Table 6. Summary Results for Scenario 2
Year 2024
After Work
2025
No Project 2026* 2027 2028* 2029 Total
Budget ($M) NA 0.0 3.0 3.0 4.5 2.5 13.0
Deferred
Maintenance
($M)

16.0 17.3 17.9 18.4 17.8 16.6 NA
Treated PCI 73 73 73 73 73 73 NA
*
Includes scheduled projects worth $1.0 million each year Figure 8. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2
$16.0
$17.3 $17.9 $18.4 $17.8
$16.6
73 73 73 73 73 73
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 2024 After
Work
2025
No Project
2026 2027 2028 2029
PCI
Deferred Maintenance ($M)
Deferred Maintenance ($M) Treated PCI
50 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
14 5.5 Scenario 3: Improve Network PCI by 5 Points ($4.7M/Year on average) This scenario aims to improve the network PCI by 5 points to 78 by 2029. As shown in Table 7 and Figure 9, the monetary investment needed to achieve this objective is $23.5 million. This scenario will result in increasing the percent of the network in “Good” condition to more than 85 percent leaving the 13.7 percent in “Fair” and 1.2 percent in “Poor” condition. This scenario eliminates all streets in “Failed” conditions. The deferred maintenance will decrease significantly to $5.2 million by 2028.

Table 7. Summary Results for Scenario 3
Year 2024 After
Work
2025 After
Work* 2026 2027* 2028 2029* Total
Budget ($M) NA 1.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.5 23.5
Deferred
Maintenance
($M)

16.0 16.3 14.8 12.3 10.9 5.2 NA
Treated PCI 73 74 75 76 77 78 NA
*
Includes scheduled projects worth $1.0 million each year Figure 9. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 3
$16.0 $16.3
$14.8
$12.3
$10.9
$5.2
73 74 75 76 77 78
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 2024 After
Work
2025 After
Work
2026 2027 2028 2029
PCI
Deferred Maintenance ($M)
Deferred Maintenance ($M) Treated PCI
51 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
15 5.6 Scenario Comparisons
Figure 10 graphically compares the annual changes in PCI for each of the two scenarios. As previously noted, the average network PCI will decrease to 68 in both Scenarios 1A and 1B respectively. In Scenario 2, the PCI will be maintained at 73 while Scenario 3 will increase the network PCI to 78 in five years owing to the substantial investment in the pavement network and as a result of eliminating all “Failed” condition streets.

Figure 10. Comparison of Annual PCI by Scenario
68 68
73 73
78 0
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
2025 Before
Work
2025 After
Work
2026 2027 2028 2029
PCI
S1A: Existing Budget with no Project Selection
S1B: Existing Budget with Project Selection
S2: Maintain PCI at 73
S3: Improve Network PCI by 5 Points
52 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
16 Figure 11 illustrates the changes in deferred maintenance over time for each scenario. For Scenarios 1A and 1B, the deferred maintenance will increase to $25.2 and $25.9 million respectively by the end of the analysis period.

Scenario 2 increases the deferred maintenance slightly to $16.6 million while Scenario 3 reduces the deferred maintenance significantly to $5.2 million owing to the substantial investment in pavement M&R activities.

Figure 11. Comparison of Annual Deferred Maintenance by Scenario

25.2 25.9

16.6 $16.0
$5.2
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
2024 After
Work
2025 After
Work
2026 2027 2028 2029
Deferred Mainteance ($M)
S1A: Existing Budget with no Project Selection
S1B: Existing Budget with Project Selection
S2: Maintain PCI at 73
S3: Improve Network PCI by 5 Points
53 PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses City of Clayton
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
17 Figure 12 illustrates the percent change in pavement condition for each scenario. As noted earlier, currently more than 65 percent of the network is in “Good” condition with no sections in “Failed” condition. For Scenarios 1A and 1B, the portion of the network in “Good” condition will decrease significantly and those in “Fair” condition will increase. Scenario 2 limits the reduction of the “Good” portion of the network to 50.2 percent and increases the “Fair” condition to 45.3 percent of the sections while maintaining the network with no “Failed” sections. Scenario 3, as noted before, shows the most improvement with more than 85 percent of the network in “Good” condition with section PCIs greater than 70. This scenario also results in no “Failed” condition streets.

Figure 12. Comparison of Pavement Condition Breakdown by Scenario

0.9%

1.2%

4.5%

5.1%

6.9%

2.0%

13.7%

45.3%

60.4%

55.9%

32.4%

85.1%

50.2%

34.5%

36.3%

65.6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
S3: Improve Network
PCI by 5 Points
S2: Maintain PCI at 73
S1B: Existing Budget
with Project Selection
S1A: Existing Budget
with no Project Selection
Current Condition
Percent of Network
Failed Poor Fair Good
Projected
2029
Condition 54
Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025
18 6 Conclusions and Recommendations
In summary, the City of Clayton has a substantial investment of $83 million in the pavement network. Overall, the City’s streets are in “Good” condition with a 2024 average network PCI of 73. Approximately 65.6 percent of the street network is in “Good” condition with no sections in “Failed” condition.

The analyses indicate that at an inflation rate of 3.5 percent, the City needs to spend approximately $26.5 million on maintenance and rehabilitation over the next five years to optimally repair all pavement sections, thus bringing the network into a condition that can be maintained with on-going preventive maintenance. In the long run, this strategy will save the City money by preventing future pavement deterioration to levels requiring rehabilitation or reconstruction.

Based on the data collected and the scenarios analyzed and presented in this report, NCE offers the following recommendations:

1. Funding – The primary goal of PMPs should be to offer users a safe and functional pavement network without unduly increasing the maintenance burden in the future. With that in mind, the recommended scenario for the City is Scenario 3, which requires approximately $23.5 million over the next five years.

This budget allocation will increase the overall network PCI to 78, increase the portion of the network in "Good" condition, and significantly reduce the deferred maintenance.

To address the gap between the City's existing funding and the recommended scenario, NCE recommends the City pursue additional funding sources. Potential sources include:

Federal Funding Sources
• American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
• Community Development Block Grants (CDBG)
• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
• Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
• Bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) • Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP)
• Surface Transportation Program (STP)
• Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act 55 Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025 19 State Funding Sources
• Active Transportation Program (ATP), which now includes the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) and Safe Routes to Schools (SR2S)
• AB 2766 (vehicle surcharge)
• CalRecycle grants
• State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
• State Water Resource Control Board
• Transportation Development Act (TDA)
• Traffic Safety Fund
• Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)
• Vehicle License Fees (VLF)
Local/Regional Funding Sources
• MTC PTAP (Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program) • Development impact fees
• Enterprise Funds (solid waste and water) MTC PTAP (Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program)
• Flood Control Districts
• General funds
• Local sales tax measures
• OBAG (One Bay Area Grant Program)
• Parcel/property taxes
• Solid waste funds
• Traffic impact fees
• Traffic safety/circulation fees
• Transportation mitigation fees
• Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT)
• Underground impact fees
• Utilities (e.g., stormwater, water, wastewater enterprise funds) • Various assessment districts (lighting, maintenance, flood control, community facilities) • Vehicle registration fees
• Vehicle code fines
56 Final Pavement Management Program Report February 2025 20 2. Pavement Management Strategies – Since a significant portion of the City’s streets are currently in “Good” condition (65.6 percent), it is important to maintain that condition to the extent possible.

Preservation occurs when streets with PCIs higher than 70 receive treatments such as surface seals (slurry, microsurfacing, etc.,). Seals are relatively inexpensive treatments that prevent moisture ingress and thus preserve the integrity of the underlying base material. NCE recommends that the City balance preventive maintenance with rehabilitation and reconstruction projects to preserve pavements in “Good” condition, improve pavements in “Poor” condition, and avoid increasing the deferred maintenance.

3. Reinspection Strategies – In order to make appropriate management decisions based on current data, NCE recommends that the City perform condition inspections on arterials and collectors every 2 years and on residentials at least every 4 to 5 years. Additionally, since StreetSaver® and other prediction models do not yet take into account the effect of specialized materials such as asphalt-binders with rubber or polymers, the actual performance of City pavements may not be fully captured in the analysis models. For this additional reason, NCE recommends regular pavement condition surveys to ensure model accuracy and relevance. This also ensures that the City remains compliant with MTC requirements for certification and funding.

4. M&R Decision Tree – NCE recommends that the City annually review and update the M&R treatment strategies and associated unit costs to reflect current construction techniques and changing costs. This will ensure that the results for the budget analyses are reliable and as accurate as possible. 57 Appendix A
Section Description Inventory
58 Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Section Description Inventory Report
This report lists a variety of section description information for each of the City’s pavement sections. It lists the street and section identifiers, limits, functional class, surface type, number of lanes, length, width, area, Inspected PCI, and PCI date.

All of the City’s pavement sections are included in the report. Two versions of the report are provided.

The first is sorted alphabetically by Street Name and Section ID and the second report is sorted by descending PCI. The field descriptions in this report are listed below:

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Street ID
Street Identification - A code up to ten characters/digits to identify the street. Generally, the street name is truncated to six characters. The Street ID should be unique for each street.

Section ID Section Identification - A code up to ten characters/digits to identify the section number.

The Section ID must be unique for each section of one street.

Street Name Street Name - The name of the street as indicated by street signs in the field.

Begin Location Beginning limit of the section.

End Location Ending limit of the section.

No. of Lanes Number of travel lanes.

Functional Class
(FC) Functional Classification: A = Arterial, C = Collector, R = Residential, O = Other Length (ft) Length of the section in feet.

Width (ft) Average width of the section in feet.

Area (sf) Area of section in square feet.

Surface Type (ST) Surface Type (A = AC Pavement, AC/AC = Asphalt Concrete Overlay).

PCI Date The last inspection date or rehabilitation date.

PCI Average PCI for the section. The value is based on the last inspection. 59 Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Section Description Inventory – Sorted by Street Name
60 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by Name
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI ACORND 010 ACORN DRIVE Elk Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 1,039 37 38,443 09/19/2024 71 AHWANE 010 AHWANEE LANE Miwok Way Cul de sac 2 R AC 840 37 31,080 09/18/2024 68 1021 001 ALEF COURT N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 200 30 6,000 09/17/2024 82 1019 001 ALEXANDER PLACE N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 330 30 9,900 09/17/2024 75 ANTELO 010 ANTELOPE COURT Obsidian Way Cul de sac 2 R AC 326 36 11,736 09/18/2024 72 2018 001 ATCHINSON STAGE COURT ATCHINSON STAGE DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 210 28 5,880 09/05/2024 72 2015 001 ATCHINSON STAGE PLACE ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 235 28 6,580 09/05/2024 72 2014 001 ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD CITY LIMITS SOUTH CLAYTON ROAD 2 R AC 2,014 30 60,420 09/05/2024 67 4073 001 BARCELONA WAY CENTERED ON WEATHERLY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 661 30 19,830 09/16/2024 83 4046 001 BERENDSEN COURT EL MOLINO DR. CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 233 30 6,990 09/16/2024 70 1004 001 BETTENCOURT DRIVE YOLANDA CIRCLE W. END YOLANDA CIRCLE E. END 2 R AC/AC 944 34 32,096 09/19/2024 86 4039 001 BIGELOW STREET MARSH CREEK RD N. MARSH CREEK RD. S. 2 R AC 1,550 30 46,500 09/16/2024 48 1029 001 BLACK POINT PLACE CAULFIELD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 563 30 16,890 09/17/2024 67 1030 001 BLACKPOINT COURT CAULFIELD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 190 30 5,700 09/17/2024 75 4048 001 BLOCHING CIRCLE EL MOLINO S. EL MOLINO N. 2 R AC/AC 1,781 30 53,430 09/16/2024 70 BLUEOA 010 BLUE OAK LANE Wawona Lane Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 1,706 37 63,122 09/18/2024 79 BRANDY 010 BRANDYWINE PLACE Peacock Creek Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 635 37 23,495 09/16/2024 82 BRIDL 001 BRIDLEWOOD COURT EASLEY DRIVE CUL DE SAC 2 R AC 961 32 30,752 09/17/2024 72 4081 001 CABERNET COURT EASLEY COURT CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 315 30 9,450 09/17/2024 62 2004 001 CALISTOGA WAY EL CAMINO DRIVE YOSIMITE CIRCLE 2 R AC 395 30 11,850 09/05/2024 74 4074 001 CAPISTRANO COURT BARCELONA WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 240 26 6,240 10/15/2024 92 CARDIN 010 CARDINET DRIVE North Mitchell Canyon Road Wallace Drive 2 R AC 1,400 34 47,600 09/17/2024 81 2009 001 CAROLINA DRIVE CITY LIMITS EL CAMINO DRIVE 2 R AC 107 28 2,996 09/05/2024 81 4071 001 CASA VERDE PLACE WEATHERLY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 103 26 2,678 09/16/2024 73 1033 001 CASEY GLEN COURT N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 220 30 6,600 09/17/2024 59 1034 001 CAULFIELD COURT CAULFIELD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 215 30 6,450 10/15/2024 84 1023 001 CAULFIELD DRIVE SOUTHBROOK DR. N. MITCHELL CANYON RD. 2 R AC 831 32 26,592 09/17/2024 72 4002 001 CENTER STREET MARSH CREEK ROAD OAK STREET 2 C AC 880 22 19,360 09/05/2024 76 4002 002A CENTER STREET MARSH CREEK ROAD 164 EO MARSH CREEK ROAD 2 C AC 164 46 7,544 09/19/2024 87 4002 003 CENTER STREET 164 EO MARSH CREEK ROAD CLAYTON ROAD 2 C AC 1,141 46 52,486 09/19/2024 77 4044 001 CHARDONNAY CIRCLE EASLEY DRIVE N EASLEY DRIVE S 2 R AC/AC 1,572 30 47,160 09/17/2024 69 6001 001 CLAYTON ROAD N. EL CAMINO ROAD N. MITCHELL CANYON ROAD 4 A AC/AC 2,700 80 216,000 09/19/2024 67 6001 002 CLAYTON ROAD CITY LIMITS @ YGNACIO VLY RD. N. EL CAMINO 4 A AC/AC 2,200 80 176,000 09/19/2024 76 6001 003 CLAYTON ROAD N. MITCHELL CANYON ROAD MAIN STREET 4 A AC/AC 1,800 44 79,200 09/19/2024 68 6001 004 CLAYTON ROAD Main Street Marsh Creek Road 4 A AC/AC 6,613 56 370,328 09/19/2024 75 CLAYMA 010 CLAYTON TO MAIN RAMP Clayton Road Main Street 2 R AC 315 26 8,190 09/19/2024 75 4041 001 CLIFFORD COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 171 30 5,130 09/16/2024 71 COALMI 010 COAL MINE COURT Gold Rush Court Cul de sac 2 R AC 224 29 6,496 09/19/2024 65 4045 001 COLOBARD COURT EASLEY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 140 30 4,200 09/17/2024 68 2005 001 CORONADO COURT EL CAMINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 157 30 4,710 09/05/2024 72 CROWPL 010 CROW PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 570 27 15,390 09/19/2024 70 DEERPL 010 DEER PLACE Acorn Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 314 38 11,932 09/19/2024 75 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 1/6 November 2024 61 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by Name
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI 3004 001 DEL TRIGO LANE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CITY LIMITS 2 R AC 630 30 18,900 09/18/2024 68 1025 001 DIABLO CREEK COURT CAULFIELD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 186 30 5,580 09/17/2024 52 1024 001 DIABLO CREEK PLACE CAULFIELD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 285 30 8,550 09/17/2024 72 4095 001 DIABLO PARKWAY EL PORTAL DRIVE MARSH CREEK ROAD 2 R AC 823 30 24,690 09/16/2024 73 4004 001 DIABLO STREET MAIN STREET HIGH STREET 2 R AC 155 37 5,735 09/05/2024 74 4007 001 DOUGLAS COURT OAK STREET CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 1,194 24 28,656 09/19/2024 74 4082 001 E. MYRICK EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 346 30 10,380 09/16/2024 76 EAGPKA 010 EAGLE PEAK AVENUE S. Oakhurst Drive Keller Ridge Drive 2 C AC 1,906 57 108,642 09/18/2024 53 EAGPKA 020 EAGLE PEAK AVENUE Keller Ridge Drive Golf Cart Crossing 2 R AC 2,000 29 58,000 09/18/2024 73 EAGPKA 030 EAGLE PEAK AVENUE Golf Cart Crossing N. Oakhurst Drive 2 R AC 1,894 36 68,184 09/18/2024 58 EAGPKP 010 EAGLE PEAK PLACE Eagle Peak Avenue Cul de sac 2 R AC 155 36 5,580 09/18/2024 56 4037 001 EASLEY DRIVE MARSH CREEK ROAD CENTER STREET 2 C AC 3,598 34 122,332 09/17/2024 73 1012 001 EASTBROOK COURT SOUTHBROOK DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 520 32 16,640 09/18/2024 83 4084 001 EBERHARDT COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 327 30 9,810 09/16/2024 74 2001 001 EL CAMINO DRIVE CLAYTON ROAD PINE HOLLOW ROAD 2 C AC 2,567 30 77,010 09/05/2024 88 4069 001 EL MOLINO DRIVE MARSH CREEK ROAD REGENCY DRIVE 2 C AC 5,012 38 190,456 09/16/2024 76 4080 001 EL PORTAL COURT EL PORTAL DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 152 30 4,560 09/16/2024 70 ELPORD 010 EL PORTAL DRIVE REGENCY DR EL PUEBLO PL 2 R AC 1,310 26 34,060 11/05/2024 36 ELPORD 020 EL PORTAL DRIVE EL PUEBLO PL EL PORTAL PL 2 R AC 700 26 18,200 09/16/2024 65 ELPORP 001 EL PORTAL PLACE EL PORTAL DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 1,241 30 37,230 09/16/2024 81 4096 001 EL PUEBLO PLACE EL PORTAL DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 1,300 30 39,000 09/16/2024 86 4093 001 EL TORO COURT EL PUEBLO PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 75 30 2,250 09/16/2024 56 ELKDRI 010 ELK DRIVE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 502 37 18,574 09/19/2024 78 FALCON 010 FALCON PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 531 37 19,647 09/19/2024 72 4011 001 FLEMING COURT FLEMING DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 325 32 10,400 09/06/2024 83 4010 001 FLEMING DRIVE ROUNDHILL DRIVE VERNON DRIVE 2 R AC/AC 577 32 18,464 10/15/2024 94 FORHIL 010 FOREST HILL DRIVE Pebble Beach Drive Inverness Way 2 R AC 1,127 37 41,699 09/16/2024 69 3018 001 FOUR OAKS LANE MOUNT ZION DRIVE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD 2 R AC/AC 473 25 11,825 09/05/2024 83 3018 002 FOUR OAKS LANE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 300 25 7,500 09/05/2024 76 1002 001 FRANK PLACE YOLANDA CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 310 34 10,540 09/19/2024 75 4036 001 GAMAY DRIVE 100' N/SEMILLON CIRCLE 100' S/ ZINFANDEL CIRCLE 2 R AC 1,244 34 42,296 09/17/2024 75 3005 001 GOETHAL COURT RHINE COURT CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 130 30 3,900 09/18/2024 81 GOLDRU 010 GOLD RUSH COURT Center Street Cul de sac 2 R AC 719 29 20,851 09/19/2024 73 GOLDEP 010 GOLDEN EAGLE PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 386 37 14,282 09/19/2024 79 GOLDEW 010 GOLDEN EAGLE WAY Keller Ridge Drive Windmill Canyon 2 R AC/AC 1,170 37 43,290 09/19/2024 74 GRAYFO 010 GRAY FOX PLACE Acorn Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 374 37 13,838 09/19/2024 64 4043 001 GRENACHE CIRCLE EASLEY DRIVE N. EASLEY DRIVE S. 2 R AC 1,352 30 40,560 09/17/2024 49 4042 001 HAMBURG CIRCLE EASLEY DRIVE N. EASLEY DRIVE S. 2 R AC 1,412 30 42,360 09/17/2024 56 HAVILA 001 HAVILAND COURT TARA DR END 2 R AC 177 22 3,894 09/18/2024 87 1008 001 HAVILAND PLACE TARA DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 692 22 15,224 09/18/2024 72 3007 001 HERRIMAN COURT MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 420 29 12,180 09/18/2024 55 3010 001 HERRIMAN DRIVE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD TIFFIN DRIVE 2 C AC 1,110 29 32,190 09/18/2024 67 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 2/6 November 2024 62 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by Name
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI HIGHST 010 HIGH STREET Marsh Creek Road End 2 R AC 336 37 12,432 09/17/2024 79 HIGHST 020 HIGH STREET Diablo Street Oak Street 2 R AC 200 37 7,400 09/05/2024 73 HUMMIP 010 HUMMINGBIRD PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 530 37 19,610 09/19/2024 75 HUMMIW 010 HUMMINGBIRD WAY Keller Ridge Drive Raven Way 2 R AC/AC 717 37 26,529 09/19/2024 65 1017 001 HURD PLACE N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 310 30 9,300 09/17/2024 76 INDHEW 010 INDIAN HEAD WAY Oakhurst Drive Indian Head Cirlce 2 R AC/AC 1,092 22 24,024 09/19/2024 81 INDWEL 010 INDIAN WELLS WAY N. Oakhurst Drive S. Oakhurst Drive 2 C AC 2,833 33 93,489 09/18/2024 52 INVERN 010 INVERNESS WAY Peacock Creek Drive Pebble Beach Drive 2 R AC 630 37 23,310 09/16/2024 68 1027 001 JEFFRY RANCH COURT N. ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 510 30 15,300 09/17/2024 67 1028 001 JEFFRY RANCH PLACE N. ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 666 30 19,980 09/17/2024 67 JOSCOL 010 JOSCOLO VIEW N. Ohlone Heights S. Ohlone Heights 2 R AC 942 36 33,912 09/19/2024 70 KELLER 010A KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Eagle Peak Avenue Pvmt. Change @ Golf Cart Crossing 2 C AC 1,558 40 62,320 09/18/2024 72 KELLER 010B KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Pvmt. Change @ Golf Cart Crossing Falcon Place 2 C AC 1,420 40 56,800 09/18/2024 75 KELLER 020A KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Falcon Place Golden Eagle Way 2 C AC/AC 994 37 36,778 09/18/2024 87 KELLER 020A2 KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Golden Eagle Way Kelok Way 2 C AC 994 37 36,778 09/18/2024 81 KELLER 020B KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Kelok Way Elk Drive 2 C AC 572 37 21,164 09/18/2024 82 KELLER 020C KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Elk Drive Kelok Way 2 C AC 1,907 37 70,559 09/18/2024 84 KELOKW 010 KELOK WAY Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 1,892 33 62,436 09/19/2024 80 3012 001 KENSTON COURT KENSTON DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 118 30 3,540 09/18/2024 70 3011 001 KENSTON DRIVE TIFFIN DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 2,032 30 60,960 09/18/2024 70 4092 001 LA CANADA COURT PORTAL PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 248 30 7,440 09/19/2024 62 LAENCI 010 LA ENCINAL COURT El Pueblo Place Cul de sac 2 R AC 733 29 21,257 09/16/2024 74 4094 001 LA HONDA COURT EL PUEBLO PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 220 30 6,600 09/16/2024 60 2002 001 LASSEN COURT EL CAMINO CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 153 30 4,590 09/05/2024 81 4072 001 LONDON COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 485 30 14,550 09/19/2024 82 LONEPN 010 LONE PINE COURT Peacock Creek Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 202 37 7,474 09/16/2024 78 2012 001 LYDIA LANE CLAYTON ROAD VERNA 2 R AC 1,342 23 30,866 09/05/2024 63 4066 001 MAIN STREET OAK STREET MARSH CREEK ROAD 2 C AC 840 44 36,960 09/05/2024 40 4077 001 MALIBU COURT EL PORTAL DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 278 30 8,340 09/16/2024 71 1014 001 MARQUETTE COURT SOUTHBROOK DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 420 32 13,440 09/18/2024 82 MARCRC 010 MARSH CREEK CIRCLE BIGELOW STREET CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 775 29 22,475 09/16/2024 71 8001 001 MARSH CREEK ROAD MAIN STREET EL MOLINO DRIVE 2 R AC/AC 3,470 44 152,680 09/17/2024 70 8001 002a MARSH CREEK ROAD EL MOLINO DRIVE CLAYTON ROAD E 2 A AC/AC 2,000 38 76,000 09/17/2024 80 8001 002b MARSH CREEK ROAD CLAYTON ROAD E S.E. CITY LIMITS 4 A AC/AC 3,485 56 195,160 09/16/2024 67 8001 003 MARSH CREEK ROAD CLAYTON ROAD W MAIN STREET 2 C AC/AC 358 36 12,888 09/17/2024 89 4086 001 MEREDITH COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 192 30 5,760 09/16/2024 72 2007 001 MICHIGAN BLVD CITY LIMITS EL CAMINO DRIVE 2 R AC/AC 204 32 6,528 09/05/2024 76 4078 001 MIRANGO COURT EL PORTAL DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 302 30 9,060 09/16/2024 72 3006 001 MITCHELL CANYON COURT MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 533 29 15,457 09/18/2024 79 7001 001 MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CLAYTON ROAD SOUTH CITY LIMITS 2 A AC/AC 4,170 24 100,080 10/15/2024 72 MIWOKW 010 MIWOK WAY Eagle Peak Avenue Blue Oak Lane 2 R AC 1,509 37 55,833 09/18/2024 80 4003 001 MORRIS STREET MAIN STREET CENTER STREET 2 R AC 215 36 7,740 09/05/2024 77 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 3/6 November 2024 63 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by Name
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI 4015 001 MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY 2 C AC/AC 4,533 38 172,254 09/06/2024 85 4025 001 MOUNTAIRE COURT MOUNTAIRE PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 255 32 8,160 09/06/2024 76 4060 001 MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY S. MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE END 2 C AC/AC 3,561 38 135,318 09/06/2024 68 4060 002 MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY Marsh Creek Road S. Mountaire Circle 4 C AC/AC 2,000 60 120,000 10/15/2024 90 4026 001 MOUNTAIRE PLACE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 375 32 12,000 09/06/2024 76 4027 001 MT. ALPINE PLACE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 284 32 9,088 09/06/2024 70 4065 001 MT. DAVIDSON COURT MT. DUNCAN CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 590 30 17,700 09/06/2024 73 4014 001 MT. DELL DRIVE MT. WASHINGTON DRIVE MT. TAMALPAIS DRIVE 2 R AC/AC 1,775 32 56,800 10/15/2024 90 4062 001 MT. DUNCAN DRIVE MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY MT. OLIVET COURT 2 R AC 1,121 34 38,114 09/06/2024 74 4057 001 MT. EDEN COURT MT. WHITNEY WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 190 30 5,700 09/06/2024 76 4028 001 MT. EMORY COURT MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 305 32 9,760 09/06/2024 78 4013 001 MT. ETNA DRIVE MT.VERNON DRIVE MT. WASHINGTON WAY 2 R AC/AC 1,297 32 41,504 09/06/2024 81 4087 001 MT. EVEREST COURT MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 627 30 18,810 09/06/2024 78 4024 001 MT. HAMILTON COURT MONTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 440 32 14,080 09/06/2024 87 4058 001 MT. LEE PLACE MT. WHITNEY WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 82 30 2,460 09/06/2024 73 4018 001 MT. MC KINLEY COURT MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 772 30 23,160 09/06/2024 79 4063 001 MT. OLIVET COURT MT. DUNCAN DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 691 30 20,730 09/06/2024 76 4064 001 MT. OLIVET PLACE DUNCAN DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 590 30 17,700 09/06/2024 77 4030 001 MT. OLYMPUS PLACE MT. WASHINGTON WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 270 30 8,100 09/06/2024 71 4055 001 MT. PALOMAR MONTAIRE PARKWAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 702 30 21,060 09/06/2024 74 4031 001 MT. RAINIER COURT MT. WASHINGTON WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 328 30 9,840 09/06/2024 68 4017 001 MT. RUSHMORE PLACE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 792 30 23,760 09/06/2024 94 4016 001 MT. SCOTT COURT MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 125 30 3,750 09/06/2024 81 4051 001 MT. SEQUOIA COURT MT. DUNCAN DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 740 30 22,200 09/06/2024 82 4061 001 MT. SEQUOIA PLACE MT. DUNCAN ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 610 30 18,300 09/06/2024 79 4032 001 MT. SHASTA COURT MT. WASHINGTON WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 418 30 12,540 09/06/2024 61 4033 001 MT. SHASTA PLACE MT. WASHINGTON WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 220 30 6,600 09/06/2024 71 4068 001 MT. SIERRA PLACE MOUNTAIRE PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 723 30 21,690 09/06/2024 83 4021 001 MT. TAMALPAIS COURT MT. TAMALPAIS DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 371 34 12,614 09/06/2024 82 4022 001 MT. TAMALPAIS DRIVE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE SOUTH CITY LIMITS 2 R AC/AC 622 34 21,148 09/06/2024 82 4023 001 MT. TAMAPLAIS PLACE MT. TAMALPAIS DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 343 34 11,662 09/06/2024 85 4019 001 MT. TETON COURT MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 392 30 11,760 09/06/2024 86 4020 001 MT. TETON PLACE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 215 30 6,450 09/06/2024 79 4067 001 MT. TRINITY COURT MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 415 30 12,450 09/06/2024 81 4012 002 MT. VERNON DRIVE FLEMING DRIVE 491 N/O MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE 2 R AC/AC 646 32 20,672 10/15/2024 92 4012 003 MT. VERNON DRIVE 491 N/O MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE 2 R AC/AC 491 32 15,712 09/06/2024 81 4029 001 MT. WASHINGTON WAY MT. ETNA DRIVE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE 2 R AC 2,023 34 68,782 09/06/2024 75 4056 001 MT. WHITNEY COURT MT. WHITNEY WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 185 30 5,550 09/06/2024 75 4059 001 MT. WHITNEY WAY MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY MT. WILSON WAY 2 R AC/AC 1,562 36 56,232 09/06/2024 83 4085 001 MT. WILSON PLACE MT. WILSON WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 315 30 9,450 09/06/2024 72 4049 001a MT. WILSON WAY MARSH CREEK ROAD CLARK CREEK CIRCLE 2 R AC/AC 1,928 34 65,552 09/06/2024 77 4049 001b MT. WILSON WAY CLARK CREEK CIRCLE MOUNTAIRE 2 R AC/AC 614 34 20,876 09/06/2024 67 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 4/6 November 2024 64 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by Name
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI 3019 001 MT. ZION CLAYTON ROAD PINE HOLLOW ROAD 2 R AC/AC 525 25 13,125 09/05/2024 85 MULLUK 010 MULLUK WAY Golden Eagle Way Windmill Canyon Drive 2 R AC 942 37 34,854 09/19/2024 59 1026 001 N. ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD CLAYTON ROAD CAULFIELD DRIVE 2 R AC 715 36 25,740 09/18/2024 60 1010 002 N. EL CAMINO DRIVE CLAYTON BLVD SOUTHBROOK DR 2 R AC 642 38 24,396 09/18/2024 75 1010 003 N. EL CAMINO DRIVE SOUTHBROOK DR MORNINGSIDE DR 2 R AC 110 38 4,180 09/18/2024 84 1020 001 N. LYDIA LANE CLAYTON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 1,036 36 37,296 09/17/2024 70 3013 001 NEWMAN COURT KENSTON DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 102 30 3,060 09/18/2024 79 7001 002 NORTH MITCHELL CANYON CLAYTON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 C AC 1,800 36 64,800 09/17/2024 64 2020 001 NOTTINGHAM CIRCLE ATCHINSON STAGE RD. N. ATCHINSON STAGE RD. S. 2 R AC 1,580 28 44,240 09/05/2024 85 2013 001 NOTTINGHAM PLACE CENTRD ON NOTTINGHAM WAY CUL-DE-SAC TO CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 580 30 17,400 09/05/2024 72 2019 001 NOTTINGHAM WAY ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD NOTTINGHAM PLACE 2 R AC 205 28 5,740 09/05/2024 75 OAKCT 005 OAK COURT OAK ST ROUNDHILL PL 2 R AC 348 29 10,092 09/19/2024 81 OAKCT 015 OAK COURT ROUNDHILL PL CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 210 29 6,090 09/19/2024 85 OAKSTR 005 OAK STREET MAIN STREET HIGH STREET 2 R AC 480 28 13,440 09/05/2024 73 OAKSTR 015 OAK STREET HIGH STREET DOUGLAS ROAD 2 R AC 990 28 27,720 09/05/2024 83 OAKHUR 005 OAKHURST DRIVE NW CITY LIMITS INDIAN WELLS WAY 4 A AC/AC 1,848 54 99,792 09/18/2024 68 OAKHUR 010 OAKHURST DRIVE INDIAN WELLS WAY CLAYTON ROAD 4 A AC/AC 4,378 54 236,412 09/18/2024 73 OBSIDC 010 OBSIDIAN COURT Obsidian Way Cul de sac 2 R AC 138 36 4,968 09/18/2024 72 OBSIDW 010 OBSIDIAN WAY Wawona Obsidian Court 2 R AC/AC 1,056 37 39,072 09/18/2024 74 1007 001 OHARA COURT HAVILAND PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 712 22 15,664 09/18/2024 76 OHLONE 010 OHLONE HEIGHTS Eagle Peak Avenue Cul de sac 2 R AC 1,347 30 40,410 09/19/2024 73 1003 001 OHMAN PLACE YOLANDA CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 482 34 16,388 09/19/2024 71 3003 001 PANADERO COURT PANADERO WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 266 28 7,448 09/18/2024 81 3001 001 PANADERO WAY DEL TRIGO LANE PINE HOLLOW ROAD 2 R AC/AC 854 30 25,620 09/18/2024 67 PEACOC 010 PEACOCK CREEK ROAD Clayton Road Torrey Pines Place 2 C AC 4,471 37 165,427 09/16/2024 76 PEBBCH 010 PEBBLE BEACH DRIVE Peacock Creek Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 2,594 37 95,978 09/16/2024 73 4075 001 PETAR COURT REGENCY DRIVE CUL DE SAC 2 R AC/AC 672 30 20,160 09/16/2024 69 3017 001 PINE HOLLOW COURT PINE HOLLOW ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 460 17 7,820 09/05/2024 64 PINEHO 010 PINE HOLLOW ROAD West City Limit Pine Hollow Court 2 A AC 1,558 30 46,740 09/05/2024 52 PINELN 010 PINE LANE Marsh Creek Road Oakwood Circle 2 R AC 540 23 12,420 09/16/2024 73 4083 001 PINOT COURT HAMBURG CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 235 30 7,050 10/10/2024 99 PROSPE 010 PROSPECTOR COURT Gold Rush Court Cul de sac 2 R AC 165 29 4,785 09/19/2024 67 RACHEL 001 RACHEL RANCH CT N. LYDIA END 2 R AC 320 20 6,400 09/17/2024 61 RAVENP 010 RAVEN PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 461 37 17,057 09/19/2024 71 RAVENW 010 RAVEN WAY Keller Ridge Drive Windmill Canyon Drive 2 R AC/AC 780 37 28,860 09/19/2024 64 2006 001 REDONDO COURT EL CAMINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 113 30 3,390 09/05/2024 76 4076 005A REGENCY DRIVE MARSH CREEK ROAD WEATHERLY DR 2 C AC 679 38 25,802 10/15/2024 79 4076 010 REGENCY DRIVE EL MOLINO DRIVE MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY 2 R AC 2,344 38 89,072 09/16/2024 77 4076 010B REGENCY DRIVE WEATHERLY DR EL MOLINO DR 2 C AC/AC 377 38 14,326 10/15/2024 93 4040 001 REISLING COURT EASLEY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 166 30 4,980 09/17/2024 67 3002 001 RHINE COURT MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 629 30 18,870 09/18/2024 74 RIALTO 010 RIALTO DRIVE Regency Drive End of Street 2 R AC/AC 838 32 26,816 09/16/2024 65 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 5/6 November 2024 65 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by Name
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI 3015 001 ROLEN COURT TIFFIN COURT CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 125 30 3,750 09/18/2024 66 4009 001 ROUNDHILL COURT ROUNDHILL PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 250 32 8,000 09/06/2024 75 4008 001 ROUNDHILL PLACE OAK COURT ROUNDHILL COURT 2 R AC/AC 1,465 30 43,950 09/06/2024 70 4088 001 SALAZAR COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 266 30 7,980 09/16/2024 75 4090 001 SAMUEL COURT MARSH CREEK ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 320 30 9,600 09/16/2024 70 4038 001 SAVIGNON COURT EASLEY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 444 30 13,320 09/17/2024 65 4035 001 SEMILLON CIRCLE GAMAY DR. N GAMAY DR. S 2 R AC 1,334 34 45,356 09/17/2024 76 2003 001 SHASTA COURT EL CAMINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 154 30 4,620 09/05/2024 80 SILVER 010 SILVERADO COURT Peacock Creek Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 203 37 7,511 09/16/2024 72 1011 001 SOUTHBROOK DRIVE 250' W/MARQUETTE COURT 100' E/EASTWOOD COURT 2 R AC/AC 1,556 34 52,904 09/18/2024 79 1011 002 SOUTHBROOK DRIVE N. LYDIA LN DIABLO CREEK CT/CAULFIELD DR 2 R AC/AC 829 37 30,673 09/17/2024 56 1018 001 SOUTHBROOK PLACE N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 300 30 9,000 09/17/2024 69 STRANA 010 STRANAHAN CIRCLE Marsh Creek Road Stranahan Circle 2 R AC 1,579 34 53,686 09/17/2024 69 4097 001 SYLVANDER COURT EASLEY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 526 32 16,832 09/17/2024 77 1005 001 TARA COURT NORTH END CUL-DE-SAC SOUTH END CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 282 22 6,204 09/18/2024 73 1006 001 TARA DRIVE CLAYTON BLVD TARA COURT 2 R AC 572 36 20,592 09/18/2024 90 3016 001 TIFFIN COURT TIFFIN DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 325 30 9,750 09/18/2024 74 3014 001 TIFFIN DRIVE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD PINE HOLLOW ROAD 2 C AC 2,357 30 70,710 09/18/2024 62 TORREY 010 TORREY PINES PLACE Peacock Creek Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 141 37 5,217 09/16/2024 74 TUYUSH 010 TUYUSHTAK COURT Obsidian Way Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 250 37 9,250 09/18/2024 76 2011 001 VERNA WAY YOSOMITE CIRCLE ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD 2 R AC 1,015 28 28,420 09/05/2024 80 2017 001 VERNA WAY EAST NOTTINGHAM CIRCLE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD 2 R AC/AC 420 28 11,760 09/05/2024 81 4047 001 W. MYRICK COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 277 30 8,310 09/16/2024 71 1031 001 WALLACE DRIVE N. MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CARDINET DRIVE 2 R AC 1,200 30 36,000 09/17/2024 73 WAWONA 10 WAWONA LANE Ahawnee Cul-de-sac 2 R AC 1,040 37 38,480 09/18/2024 70 4070 001 WEATHERLY REGENCY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 1,394 38 52,972 09/16/2024 76 1013 001 WESTBROOK COURT SOUTHBROOK DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 353 32 11,296 09/18/2024 82 1022 001 WHITT COURT N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 330 30 9,900 09/17/2024 62 3009 001 WIDMAR COURT MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 304 29 8,816 09/18/2024 73 3008 001 WIDMAR PLACE WIDMAR COURT CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 444 29 12,876 09/18/2024 61 WILDCA 010 WILD CAT WAY Blue Oak Lane Obsidian Way 2 R AC 369 38 14,022 09/18/2024 76 WINDMD 010 WINDMILL CANYON DRIVE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 3,032 37 112,184 09/19/2024 75 WINDMP 010 WINDMILL CANYON PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 706 36 25,416 09/19/2024 70 4089 001 WRIGHT COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 320 30 9,600 09/16/2024 79 1015 001 XAVIER PLACE MARQUETTE COURT CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 128 32 4,096 09/18/2024 76 1001 001 YOLANDA CIRCLE CONCORD BLVD @ CTY LIMIT CONCORD BLVD 1200' N CTY LMT 2 R AC 2,500 34 85,000 09/19/2024 70 2010 001 YOSEMITE CIRCLE EL CAMINO DRIVE S. EL CAMINO DRIVE N. 2 R AC 2,430 32 77,760 09/05/2024 85 2008 001 YOSEMITE COURT EL CAMINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 212 28 5,936 09/05/2024 74 4034 001 ZINFANDEL CIRCLE GAMAY DR. N. GAMAY DR. S. 2 R AC/AC 1,402 34 47,668 09/17/2024 73 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 6/6 November 2024 66 Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Section Description Inventory – Sorted by Descending PCI 67 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by PCI
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI 4083 001 PINOT COURT HAMBURG CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 235 30 7,050 10/10/2024 99 4010 001 FLEMING DRIVE ROUNDHILL DRIVE VERNON DRIVE 2 R AC/AC 577 32 18,464 10/15/2024 94 4017 001 MT. RUSHMORE PLACE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 792 30 23,760 09/06/2024 94 4076 010B REGENCY DRIVE WEATHERLY DR EL MOLINO DR 2 C AC/AC 377 38 14,326 10/15/2024 93 4012 002 MT. VERNON DRIVE FLEMING DRIVE 491 N/O MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE 2 R AC/AC 646 32 20,672 10/15/2024 92 4074 001 CAPISTRANO COURT BARCELONA WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 240 26 6,240 10/15/2024 92 1006 001 TARA DRIVE CLAYTON BLVD TARA COURT 2 R AC 572 36 20,592 09/18/2024 90 4014 001 MT. DELL DRIVE MT. WASHINGTON DRIVE MT. TAMALPAIS DRIVE 2 R AC/AC 1,775 32 56,800 10/15/2024 90 4060 002 MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY Marsh Creek Road S. Mountaire Circle 4 C AC/AC 2,000 60 120,000 10/15/2024 90 8001 003 MARSH CREEK ROAD CLAYTON ROAD W MAIN STREET 2 C AC/AC 358 36 12,888 09/17/2024 89 2001 001 EL CAMINO DRIVE CLAYTON ROAD PINE HOLLOW ROAD 2 C AC 2,567 30 77,010 09/05/2024 88 4002 002A CENTER STREET MARSH CREEK ROAD 164 EO MARSH CREEK ROAD 2 C AC 164 46 7,544 09/19/2024 87 4024 001 MT. HAMILTON COURT MONTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 440 32 14,080 09/06/2024 87 HAVILA 001 HAVILAND COURT TARA DR END 2 R AC 177 22 3,894 09/18/2024 87 KELLER 020A KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Falcon Place Golden Eagle Way 2 C AC/AC 994 37 36,778 09/18/2024 87 1004 001 BETTENCOURT DRIVE YOLANDA CIRCLE W. END YOLANDA CIRCLE E. END 2 R AC/AC 944 34 32,096 09/19/2024 86 4019 001 MT. TETON COURT MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 392 30 11,760 09/06/2024 86 4096 001 EL PUEBLO PLACE EL PORTAL DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 1,300 30 39,000 09/16/2024 86 2010 001 YOSEMITE CIRCLE EL CAMINO DRIVE S. EL CAMINO DRIVE N. 2 R AC 2,430 32 77,760 09/05/2024 85 2020 001 NOTTINGHAM CIRCLE ATCHINSON STAGE RD. N. ATCHINSON STAGE RD. S. 2 R AC 1,580 28 44,240 09/05/2024 85 3019 001 MT. ZION CLAYTON ROAD PINE HOLLOW ROAD 2 R AC/AC 525 25 13,125 09/05/2024 85 4015 001 MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY 2 C AC/AC 4,533 38 172,254 09/06/2024 85 4023 001 MT. TAMAPLAIS PLACE MT. TAMALPAIS DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 343 34 11,662 09/06/2024 85 OAKCT 015 OAK COURT ROUNDHILL PL CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 210 29 6,090 09/19/2024 85 1010 003 N. EL CAMINO DRIVE SOUTHBROOK DR MORNINGSIDE DR 2 R AC 110 38 4,180 09/18/2024 84 1034 001 CAULFIELD COURT CAULFIELD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 215 30 6,450 10/15/2024 84 KELLER 020C KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Elk Drive Kelok Way 2 C AC 1,907 37 70,559 09/18/2024 84 1012 001 EASTBROOK COURT SOUTHBROOK DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 520 32 16,640 09/18/2024 83 3018 001 FOUR OAKS LANE MOUNT ZION DRIVE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD 2 R AC/AC 473 25 11,825 09/05/2024 83 4011 001 FLEMING COURT FLEMING DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 325 32 10,400 09/06/2024 83 4059 001 MT. WHITNEY WAY MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY MT. WILSON WAY 2 R AC/AC 1,562 36 56,232 09/06/2024 83 4068 001 MT. SIERRA PLACE MOUNTAIRE PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 723 30 21,690 09/06/2024 83 4073 001 BARCELONA WAY CENTERED ON WEATHERLY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 661 30 19,830 09/16/2024 83 OAKSTR 015 OAK STREET HIGH STREET DOUGLAS ROAD 2 R AC 990 28 27,720 09/05/2024 83 1013 001 WESTBROOK COURT SOUTHBROOK DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 353 32 11,296 09/18/2024 82 1014 001 MARQUETTE COURT SOUTHBROOK DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 420 32 13,440 09/18/2024 82 1021 001 ALEF COURT N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 200 30 6,000 09/17/2024 82 4021 001 MT. TAMALPAIS COURT MT. TAMALPAIS DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 371 34 12,614 09/06/2024 82 4022 001 MT. TAMALPAIS DRIVE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE SOUTH CITY LIMITS 2 R AC/AC 622 34 21,148 09/06/2024 82 4051 001 MT. SEQUOIA COURT MT. DUNCAN DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 740 30 22,200 09/06/2024 82 4072 001 LONDON COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 485 30 14,550 09/19/2024 82 BRANDY 010 BRANDYWINE PLACE Peacock Creek Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 635 37 23,495 09/16/2024 82 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 1/6 November 2024 68 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by PCI
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI KELLER 020B KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Kelok Way Elk Drive 2 C AC 572 37 21,164 09/18/2024 82 2002 001 LASSEN COURT EL CAMINO CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 153 30 4,590 09/05/2024 81 2009 001 CAROLINA DRIVE CITY LIMITS EL CAMINO DRIVE 2 R AC 107 28 2,996 09/05/2024 81 2017 001 VERNA WAY EAST NOTTINGHAM CIRCLE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD 2 R AC/AC 420 28 11,760 09/05/2024 81 3003 001 PANADERO COURT PANADERO WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 266 28 7,448 09/18/2024 81 3005 001 GOETHAL COURT RHINE COURT CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 130 30 3,900 09/18/2024 81 4012 003 MT. VERNON DRIVE 491 N/O MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE 2 R AC/AC 491 32 15,712 09/06/2024 81 4013 001 MT. ETNA DRIVE MT.VERNON DRIVE MT. WASHINGTON WAY 2 R AC/AC 1,297 32 41,504 09/06/2024 81 4016 001 MT. SCOTT COURT MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 125 30 3,750 09/06/2024 81 4067 001 MT. TRINITY COURT MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 415 30 12,450 09/06/2024 81 CARDIN 010 CARDINET DRIVE North Mitchell Canyon Road Wallace Drive 2 R AC 1,400 34 47,600 09/17/2024 81 ELPORP 001 EL PORTAL PLACE EL PORTAL DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 1,241 30 37,230 09/16/2024 81 INDHEW 010 INDIAN HEAD WAY Oakhurst Drive Indian Head Cirlce 2 R AC/AC 1,092 22 24,024 09/19/2024 81 KELLER 020A2 KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Golden Eagle Way Kelok Way 2 C AC 994 37 36,778 09/18/2024 81 OAKCT 005 OAK COURT OAK ST ROUNDHILL PL 2 R AC 348 29 10,092 09/19/2024 81 2003 001 SHASTA COURT EL CAMINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 154 30 4,620 09/05/2024 80 2011 001 VERNA WAY YOSOMITE CIRCLE ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD 2 R AC 1,015 28 28,420 09/05/2024 80 8001 002a MARSH CREEK ROAD EL MOLINO DRIVE CLAYTON ROAD E 2 A AC/AC 2,000 38 76,000 09/17/2024 80 KELOKW 010 KELOK WAY Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 1,892 33 62,436 09/19/2024 80 MIWOKW 010 MIWOK WAY Eagle Peak Avenue Blue Oak Lane 2 R AC 1,509 37 55,833 09/18/2024 80 1011 001 SOUTHBROOK DRIVE 250' W/MARQUETTE COURT 100' E/EASTWOOD COURT 2 R AC/AC 1,556 34 52,904 09/18/2024 79 3006 001 MITCHELL CANYON COURT MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 533 29 15,457 09/18/2024 79 3013 001 NEWMAN COURT KENSTON DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 102 30 3,060 09/18/2024 79 4018 001 MT. MC KINLEY COURT MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 772 30 23,160 09/06/2024 79 4020 001 MT. TETON PLACE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 215 30 6,450 09/06/2024 79 4061 001 MT. SEQUOIA PLACE MT. DUNCAN ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 610 30 18,300 09/06/2024 79 4076 005A REGENCY DRIVE MARSH CREEK ROAD WEATHERLY DR 2 C AC 679 38 25,802 10/15/2024 79 4089 001 WRIGHT COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 320 30 9,600 09/16/2024 79 BLUEOA 010 BLUE OAK LANE Wawona Lane Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 1,706 37 63,122 09/18/2024 79 GOLDEP 010 GOLDEN EAGLE PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 386 37 14,282 09/19/2024 79 HIGHST 010 HIGH STREET Marsh Creek Road End 2 R AC 336 37 12,432 09/17/2024 79 4028 001 MT. EMORY COURT MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 305 32 9,760 09/06/2024 78 4087 001 MT. EVEREST COURT MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 627 30 18,810 09/06/2024 78 ELKDRI 010 ELK DRIVE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 502 37 18,574 09/19/2024 78 LONEPN 010 LONE PINE COURT Peacock Creek Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 202 37 7,474 09/16/2024 78 4002 003 CENTER STREET 164 EO MARSH CREEK ROAD CLAYTON ROAD 2 C AC 1,141 46 52,486 09/19/2024 77 4003 001 MORRIS STREET MAIN STREET CENTER STREET 2 R AC 215 36 7,740 09/05/2024 77 4049 001a MT. WILSON WAY MARSH CREEK ROAD CLARK CREEK CIRCLE 2 R AC/AC 1,928 34 65,552 09/06/2024 77 4064 001 MT. OLIVET PLACE DUNCAN DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 590 30 17,700 09/06/2024 77 4076 010 REGENCY DRIVE EL MOLINO DRIVE MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY 2 R AC 2,344 38 89,072 09/16/2024 77 4097 001 SYLVANDER COURT EASLEY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 526 32 16,832 09/17/2024 77 1007 001 OHARA COURT HAVILAND PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 712 22 15,664 09/18/2024 76 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 2/6 November 2024 69 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by PCI
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI 1015 001 XAVIER PLACE MARQUETTE COURT CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 128 32 4,096 09/18/2024 76 1017 001 HURD PLACE N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 310 30 9,300 09/17/2024 76 2006 001 REDONDO COURT EL CAMINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 113 30 3,390 09/05/2024 76 2007 001 MICHIGAN BLVD CITY LIMITS EL CAMINO DRIVE 2 R AC/AC 204 32 6,528 09/05/2024 76 3018 002 FOUR OAKS LANE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 300 25 7,500 09/05/2024 76 4002 001 CENTER STREET MARSH CREEK ROAD OAK STREET 2 C AC 880 22 19,360 09/05/2024 76 4025 001 MOUNTAIRE COURT MOUNTAIRE PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 255 32 8,160 09/06/2024 76 4026 001 MOUNTAIRE PLACE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 375 32 12,000 09/06/2024 76 4035 001 SEMILLON CIRCLE GAMAY DR. N GAMAY DR. S 2 R AC 1,334 34 45,356 09/17/2024 76 4057 001 MT. EDEN COURT MT. WHITNEY WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 190 30 5,700 09/06/2024 76 4063 001 MT. OLIVET COURT MT. DUNCAN DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 691 30 20,730 09/06/2024 76 4069 001 EL MOLINO DRIVE MARSH CREEK ROAD REGENCY DRIVE 2 C AC 5,012 38 190,456 09/16/2024 76 4070 001 WEATHERLY REGENCY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 1,394 38 52,972 09/16/2024 76 4082 001 E. MYRICK EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 346 30 10,380 09/16/2024 76 6001 002 CLAYTON ROAD CITY LIMITS @ YGNACIO VLY RD. N. EL CAMINO 4 A AC/AC 2,200 80 176,000 09/19/2024 76 PEACOC 010 PEACOCK CREEK ROAD Clayton Road Torrey Pines Place 2 C AC 4,471 37 165,427 09/16/2024 76 TUYUSH 010 TUYUSHTAK COURT Obsidian Way Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 250 37 9,250 09/18/2024 76 WILDCA 010 WILD CAT WAY Blue Oak Lane Obsidian Way 2 R AC 369 38 14,022 09/18/2024 76 1002 001 FRANK PLACE YOLANDA CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 310 34 10,540 09/19/2024 75 1010 002 N. EL CAMINO DRIVE CLAYTON BLVD SOUTHBROOK DR 2 R AC 642 38 24,396 09/18/2024 75 1019 001 ALEXANDER PLACE N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 330 30 9,900 09/17/2024 75 1030 001 BLACKPOINT COURT CAULFIELD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 190 30 5,700 09/17/2024 75 2019 001 NOTTINGHAM WAY ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD NOTTINGHAM PLACE 2 R AC 205 28 5,740 09/05/2024 75 4009 001 ROUNDHILL COURT ROUNDHILL PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 250 32 8,000 09/06/2024 75 4029 001 MT. WASHINGTON WAY MT. ETNA DRIVE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE 2 R AC 2,023 34 68,782 09/06/2024 75 4036 001 GAMAY DRIVE 100' N/SEMILLON CIRCLE 100' S/ ZINFANDEL CIRCLE 2 R AC 1,244 34 42,296 09/17/2024 75 4056 001 MT. WHITNEY COURT MT. WHITNEY WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 185 30 5,550 09/06/2024 75 4088 001 SALAZAR COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 266 30 7,980 09/16/2024 75 6001 004 CLAYTON ROAD Main Street Marsh Creek Road 4 A AC/AC 6,613 56 370,328 09/19/2024 75 CLAYMA 010 CLAYTON TO MAIN RAMP Clayton Road Main Street 2 R AC 315 26 8,190 09/19/2024 75 DEERPL 010 DEER PLACE Acorn Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 314 38 11,932 09/19/2024 75 HUMMIP 010 HUMMINGBIRD PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 530 37 19,610 09/19/2024 75 KELLER 010B KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Pvmt. Change @ Golf Cart Crossing Falcon Place 2 C AC 1,420 40 56,800 09/18/2024 75 WINDMD 010 WINDMILL CANYON DRIVE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 3,032 37 112,184 09/19/2024 75 2004 001 CALISTOGA WAY EL CAMINO DRIVE YOSIMITE CIRCLE 2 R AC 395 30 11,850 09/05/2024 74 2008 001 YOSEMITE COURT EL CAMINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 212 28 5,936 09/05/2024 74 3002 001 RHINE COURT MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 629 30 18,870 09/18/2024 74 3016 001 TIFFIN COURT TIFFIN DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 325 30 9,750 09/18/2024 74 4004 001 DIABLO STREET MAIN STREET HIGH STREET 2 R AC 155 37 5,735 09/05/2024 74 4007 001 DOUGLAS COURT OAK STREET CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 1,194 24 28,656 09/19/2024 74 4055 001 MT. PALOMAR MONTAIRE PARKWAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 702 30 21,060 09/06/2024 74 4062 001 MT. DUNCAN DRIVE MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY MT. OLIVET COURT 2 R AC 1,121 34 38,114 09/06/2024 74 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 3/6 November 2024 70 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by PCI
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI 4084 001 EBERHARDT COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 327 30 9,810 09/16/2024 74 GOLDEW 010 GOLDEN EAGLE WAY Keller Ridge Drive Windmill Canyon 2 R AC/AC 1,170 37 43,290 09/19/2024 74 LAENCI 010 LA ENCINAL COURT El Pueblo Place Cul de sac 2 R AC 733 29 21,257 09/16/2024 74 OBSIDW 010 OBSIDIAN WAY Wawona Obsidian Court 2 R AC/AC 1,056 37 39,072 09/18/2024 74 TORREY 010 TORREY PINES PLACE Peacock Creek Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 141 37 5,217 09/16/2024 74 1005 001 TARA COURT NORTH END CUL-DE-SAC SOUTH END CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 282 22 6,204 09/18/2024 73 1031 001 WALLACE DRIVE N. MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CARDINET DRIVE 2 R AC 1,200 30 36,000 09/17/2024 73 3009 001 WIDMAR COURT MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 304 29 8,816 09/18/2024 73 4034 001 ZINFANDEL CIRCLE GAMAY DR. N. GAMAY DR. S. 2 R AC/AC 1,402 34 47,668 09/17/2024 73 4037 001 EASLEY DRIVE MARSH CREEK ROAD CENTER STREET 2 C AC 3,598 34 122,332 09/17/2024 73 4058 001 MT. LEE PLACE MT. WHITNEY WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 82 30 2,460 09/06/2024 73 4065 001 MT. DAVIDSON COURT MT. DUNCAN CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 590 30 17,700 09/06/2024 73 4071 001 CASA VERDE PLACE WEATHERLY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 103 26 2,678 09/16/2024 73 4095 001 DIABLO PARKWAY EL PORTAL DRIVE MARSH CREEK ROAD 2 R AC 823 30 24,690 09/16/2024 73 EAGPKA 020 EAGLE PEAK AVENUE Keller Ridge Drive Golf Cart Crossing 2 R AC 2,000 29 58,000 09/18/2024 73 GOLDRU 010 GOLD RUSH COURT Center Street Cul de sac 2 R AC 719 29 20,851 09/19/2024 73 HIGHST 020 HIGH STREET Diablo Street Oak Street 2 R AC 200 37 7,400 09/05/2024 73 OAKHUR 010 OAKHURST DRIVE INDIAN WELLS WAY CLAYTON ROAD 4 A AC/AC 4,378 54 236,412 09/18/2024 73 OAKSTR 005 OAK STREET MAIN STREET HIGH STREET 2 R AC 480 28 13,440 09/05/2024 73 OHLONE 010 OHLONE HEIGHTS Eagle Peak Avenue Cul de sac 2 R AC 1,347 30 40,410 09/19/2024 73 PEBBCH 010 PEBBLE BEACH DRIVE Peacock Creek Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 2,594 37 95,978 09/16/2024 73 PINELN 010 PINE LANE Marsh Creek Road Oakwood Circle 2 R AC 540 23 12,420 09/16/2024 73 1008 001 HAVILAND PLACE TARA DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 692 22 15,224 09/18/2024 72 1023 001 CAULFIELD DRIVE SOUTHBROOK DR. N. MITCHELL CANYON RD. 2 R AC 831 32 26,592 09/17/2024 72 1024 001 DIABLO CREEK PLACE CAULFIELD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 285 30 8,550 09/17/2024 72 2005 001 CORONADO COURT EL CAMINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 157 30 4,710 09/05/2024 72 2013 001 NOTTINGHAM PLACE CENTRD ON NOTTINGHAM WAY CUL-DE-SAC TO CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 580 30 17,400 09/05/2024 72 2015 001 ATCHINSON STAGE PLACE ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 235 28 6,580 09/05/2024 72 2018 001 ATCHINSON STAGE COURT ATCHINSON STAGE DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 210 28 5,880 09/05/2024 72 4078 001 MIRANGO COURT EL PORTAL DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 302 30 9,060 09/16/2024 72 4085 001 MT. WILSON PLACE MT. WILSON WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 315 30 9,450 09/06/2024 72 4086 001 MEREDITH COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 192 30 5,760 09/16/2024 72 7001 001 MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CLAYTON ROAD SOUTH CITY LIMITS 2 A AC/AC 4,170 24 100,080 10/15/2024 72 ANTELO 010 ANTELOPE COURT Obsidian Way Cul de sac 2 R AC 326 36 11,736 09/18/2024 72 BRIDL 001 BRIDLEWOOD COURT EASLEY DRIVE CUL DE SAC 2 R AC 961 32 30,752 09/17/2024 72 FALCON 010 FALCON PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 531 37 19,647 09/19/2024 72 KELLER 010A KELLER RIDGE DRIVE Eagle Peak Avenue Pvmt. Change @ Golf Cart Crossing 2 C AC 1,558 40 62,320 09/18/2024 72 OBSIDC 010 OBSIDIAN COURT Obsidian Way Cul de sac 2 R AC 138 36 4,968 09/18/2024 72 SILVER 010 SILVERADO COURT Peacock Creek Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 203 37 7,511 09/16/2024 72 1003 001 OHMAN PLACE YOLANDA CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 482 34 16,388 09/19/2024 71 4030 001 MT. OLYMPUS PLACE MT. WASHINGTON WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 270 30 8,100 09/06/2024 71 4033 001 MT. SHASTA PLACE MT. WASHINGTON WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 220 30 6,600 09/06/2024 71 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 4/6 November 2024 71 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by PCI
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI 4041 001 CLIFFORD COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 171 30 5,130 09/16/2024 71 4047 001 W. MYRICK COURT EL MOLINO DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 277 30 8,310 09/16/2024 71 4077 001 MALIBU COURT EL PORTAL DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 278 30 8,340 09/16/2024 71 ACORND 010 ACORN DRIVE Elk Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 1,039 37 38,443 09/19/2024 71 MARCRC 010 MARSH CREEK CIRCLE BIGELOW STREET CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 775 29 22,475 09/16/2024 71 RAVENP 010 RAVEN PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 461 37 17,057 09/19/2024 71 1001 001 YOLANDA CIRCLE CONCORD BLVD @ CTY LIMIT CONCORD BLVD 1200' N CTY LMT 2 R AC 2,500 34 85,000 09/19/2024 70 1020 001 N. LYDIA LANE CLAYTON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 1,036 36 37,296 09/17/2024 70 3011 001 KENSTON DRIVE TIFFIN DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 2,032 30 60,960 09/18/2024 70 3012 001 KENSTON COURT KENSTON DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 118 30 3,540 09/18/2024 70 4008 001 ROUNDHILL PLACE OAK COURT ROUNDHILL COURT 2 R AC/AC 1,465 30 43,950 09/06/2024 70 4027 001 MT. ALPINE PLACE MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 284 32 9,088 09/06/2024 70 4046 001 BERENDSEN COURT EL MOLINO DR. CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 233 30 6,990 09/16/2024 70 4048 001 BLOCHING CIRCLE EL MOLINO S. EL MOLINO N. 2 R AC/AC 1,781 30 53,430 09/16/2024 70 4080 001 EL PORTAL COURT EL PORTAL DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 152 30 4,560 09/16/2024 70 4090 001 SAMUEL COURT MARSH CREEK ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 320 30 9,600 09/16/2024 70 8001 001 MARSH CREEK ROAD MAIN STREET EL MOLINO DRIVE 2 R AC/AC 3,470 44 152,680 09/17/2024 70 CROWPL 010 CROW PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 570 27 15,390 09/19/2024 70 JOSCOL 010 JOSCOLO VIEW N. Ohlone Heights S. Ohlone Heights 2 R AC 942 36 33,912 09/19/2024 70 WAWONA 10 WAWONA LANE Ahawnee Cul-de-sac 2 R AC 1,040 37 38,480 09/18/2024 70 WINDMP 010 WINDMILL CANYON PLACE Keller Ridge Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC/AC 706 36 25,416 09/19/2024 70 1018 001 SOUTHBROOK PLACE N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 300 30 9,000 09/17/2024 69 4044 001 CHARDONNAY CIRCLE EASLEY DRIVE N EASLEY DRIVE S 2 R AC/AC 1,572 30 47,160 09/17/2024 69 4075 001 PETAR COURT REGENCY DRIVE CUL DE SAC 2 R AC/AC 672 30 20,160 09/16/2024 69 FORHIL 010 FOREST HILL DRIVE Pebble Beach Drive Inverness Way 2 R AC 1,127 37 41,699 09/16/2024 69 STRANA 010 STRANAHAN CIRCLE Marsh Creek Road Stranahan Circle 2 R AC 1,579 34 53,686 09/17/2024 69 3004 001 DEL TRIGO LANE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CITY LIMITS 2 R AC 630 30 18,900 09/18/2024 68 4031 001 MT. RAINIER COURT MT. WASHINGTON WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 328 30 9,840 09/06/2024 68 4045 001 COLOBARD COURT EASLEY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 140 30 4,200 09/17/2024 68 4060 001 MOUNTAIRE PARKWAY S. MOUNTAIRE CIRCLE END 2 C AC/AC 3,561 38 135,318 09/06/2024 68 6001 003 CLAYTON ROAD N. MITCHELL CANYON ROAD MAIN STREET 4 A AC/AC 1,800 44 79,200 09/19/2024 68 AHWANE 010 AHWANEE LANE Miwok Way Cul de sac 2 R AC 840 37 31,080 09/18/2024 68 INVERN 010 INVERNESS WAY Peacock Creek Drive Pebble Beach Drive 2 R AC 630 37 23,310 09/16/2024 68 OAKHUR 005 OAKHURST DRIVE NW CITY LIMITS INDIAN WELLS WAY 4 A AC/AC 1,848 54 99,792 09/18/2024 68 1027 001 JEFFRY RANCH COURT N. ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 510 30 15,300 09/17/2024 67 1028 001 JEFFRY RANCH PLACE N. ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 666 30 19,980 09/17/2024 67 1029 001 BLACK POINT PLACE CAULFIELD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 563 30 16,890 09/17/2024 67 2014 001 ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD CITY LIMITS SOUTH CLAYTON ROAD 2 R AC 2,014 30 60,420 09/05/2024 67 3001 001 PANADERO WAY DEL TRIGO LANE PINE HOLLOW ROAD 2 R AC/AC 854 30 25,620 09/18/2024 67 3010 001 HERRIMAN DRIVE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD TIFFIN DRIVE 2 C AC 1,110 29 32,190 09/18/2024 67 4040 001 REISLING COURT EASLEY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 166 30 4,980 09/17/2024 67 4049 001b MT. WILSON WAY CLARK CREEK CIRCLE MOUNTAIRE 2 R AC/AC 614 34 20,876 09/06/2024 67 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 5/6 November 2024 72 City of Clayton - PTAP 25
PCI Listing Report
Sorted by PCI
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI Date PCI 6001 001 CLAYTON ROAD N. EL CAMINO ROAD N. MITCHELL CANYON ROAD 4 A AC/AC 2,700 80 216,000 09/19/2024 67 8001 002b MARSH CREEK ROAD CLAYTON ROAD E S.E. CITY LIMITS 4 A AC/AC 3,485 56 195,160 09/16/2024 67 PROSPE 010 PROSPECTOR COURT Gold Rush Court Cul de sac 2 R AC 165 29 4,785 09/19/2024 67 3015 001 ROLEN COURT TIFFIN COURT CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 125 30 3,750 09/18/2024 66 4038 001 SAVIGNON COURT EASLEY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 444 30 13,320 09/17/2024 65 COALMI 010 COAL MINE COURT Gold Rush Court Cul de sac 2 R AC 224 29 6,496 09/19/2024 65 ELPORD 020 EL PORTAL DRIVE EL PUEBLO PL EL PORTAL PL 2 R AC 700 26 18,200 09/16/2024 65 HUMMIW 010 HUMMINGBIRD WAY Keller Ridge Drive Raven Way 2 R AC/AC 717 37 26,529 09/19/2024 65 RIALTO 010 RIALTO DRIVE Regency Drive End of Street 2 R AC/AC 838 32 26,816 09/16/2024 65 3017 001 PINE HOLLOW COURT PINE HOLLOW ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 460 17 7,820 09/05/2024 64 7001 002 NORTH MITCHELL CANYON CLAYTON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 C AC 1,800 36 64,800 09/17/2024 64 GRAYFO 010 GRAY FOX PLACE Acorn Drive Cul de sac 2 R AC 374 37 13,838 09/19/2024 64 RAVENW 010 RAVEN WAY Keller Ridge Drive Windmill Canyon Drive 2 R AC/AC 780 37 28,860 09/19/2024 64 2012 001 LYDIA LANE CLAYTON ROAD VERNA 2 R AC 1,342 23 30,866 09/05/2024 63 1022 001 WHITT COURT N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 330 30 9,900 09/17/2024 62 3014 001 TIFFIN DRIVE MITCHELL CANYON ROAD PINE HOLLOW ROAD 2 C AC 2,357 30 70,710 09/18/2024 62 4081 001 CABERNET COURT EASLEY COURT CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 315 30 9,450 09/17/2024 62 4092 001 LA CANADA COURT PORTAL PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 248 30 7,440 09/19/2024 62 3008 001 WIDMAR PLACE WIDMAR COURT CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 444 29 12,876 09/18/2024 61 4032 001 MT. SHASTA COURT MT. WASHINGTON WAY CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 418 30 12,540 09/06/2024 61 RACHEL 001 RACHEL RANCH CT N. LYDIA END 2 R AC 320 20 6,400 09/17/2024 61 1026 001 N. ATCHINSON STAGE ROAD CLAYTON ROAD CAULFIELD DRIVE 2 R AC 715 36 25,740 09/18/2024 60 4094 001 LA HONDA COURT EL PUEBLO PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 220 30 6,600 09/16/2024 60 1033 001 CASEY GLEN COURT N. LYDIA LANE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 220 30 6,600 09/17/2024 59 MULLUK 010 MULLUK WAY Golden Eagle Way Windmill Canyon Drive 2 R AC 942 37 34,854 09/19/2024 59 EAGPKA 030 EAGLE PEAK AVENUE Golf Cart Crossing N. Oakhurst Drive 2 R AC 1,894 36 68,184 09/18/2024 58 1011 002 SOUTHBROOK DRIVE N. LYDIA LN DIABLO CREEK CT/CAULFIELD DR 2 R AC/AC 829 37 30,673 09/17/2024 56 4042 001 HAMBURG CIRCLE EASLEY DRIVE N. EASLEY DRIVE S. 2 R AC 1,412 30 42,360 09/17/2024 56 4093 001 EL TORO COURT EL PUEBLO PLACE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 75 30 2,250 09/16/2024 56 EAGPKP 010 EAGLE PEAK PLACE Eagle Peak Avenue Cul de sac 2 R AC 155 36 5,580 09/18/2024 56 3007 001 HERRIMAN COURT MITCHELL CANYON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC 420 29 12,180 09/18/2024 55 EAGPKA 010 EAGLE PEAK AVENUE S. Oakhurst Drive Keller Ridge Drive 2 C AC 1,906 57 108,642 09/18/2024 53 1025 001 DIABLO CREEK COURT CAULFIELD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 2 R AC/AC 186 30 5,580 09/17/2024 52 INDWEL 010 INDIAN WELLS WAY N. Oakhurst Drive S. Oakhurst Drive 2 C AC 2,833 33 93,489 09/18/2024 52 PINEHO 010 PINE HOLLOW ROAD West City Limit Pine Hollow Court 2 A AC 1,558 30 46,740 09/05/2024 52 4043 001 GRENACHE CIRCLE EASLEY DRIVE N. EASLEY DRIVE S. 2 R AC 1,352 30 40,560 09/17/2024 49 4039 001 BIGELOW STREET MARSH CREEK RD N. MARSH CREEK RD. S. 2 R AC 1,550 30 46,500 09/16/2024 48 4066 001 MAIN STREET OAK STREET MARSH CREEK ROAD 2 C AC 840 44 36,960 09/05/2024 40 ELPORD 010 EL PORTAL DRIVE REGENCY DR EL PUEBLO PL 2 R AC 1,310 26 34,060 11/05/2024 36 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials), O (Other) ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) Page 6/6 November 2024 73 Appendix B
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree
74 Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) Decision Tree
This report presents the current maintenance and rehabilitation decision tree that exists in the database.

The decision tree forms the basis for all of the budgetary computations included in this report. Changes to the decision tree will make the results in the budget reports invalid. All pavement treatment unit costs relevant to the road types in the database were updated.

The decision tree lists the treatments and costs selected for preventive maintenance and rehabilitation activities. Each line represents a specific combination of functional classification and surface type.

The preventive maintenance portion of the report is identified as Condition Category I – Very Good. All preventive maintenance treatment listings are assigned only to sections in Condition Category I where the PCI ≥ 70. Sections with PCI values less than 70 are assigned to treatments listed in Categories II through V.

In the preventive maintenance category (PCI  70), a time sequence is used to identify the appropriate treatment and cost. Each preventive maintenance treatment description consists of three parts: 1) a CRACK treatment, 2) a SURFACE treatment, and 3) a RESTORATION treatment. These three parts allow the user to specify one of three different preventive maintenance treatments depending on the prior maintenance history of the section.

1. The CRACK treatment part can be used to specify the most frequent type of preventive maintenance activity planned (typically crack seals).

2. The SURFACE treatment part can be used to specify more extensive and less frequent preventive maintenance activities, such as chip seals or slurry seals. For example, a crack seal can be specified on a 3-year cycle with a slurry seal specified after 5 years.

3. The RESTORATION part can be used to specify a surface restoration treatment (such as an overlay) to be performed after a specified number of surface treatments. For example, after a certain number of successive slurry seals, an overlay can be specified instead of another slurry seal.

Rehabilitation treatments are assigned to sections in Condition Categories II through V (PCI less than 70).

Each line is defined by a specific combination of functional classification, surface type, and condition category.

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Functional Class Functional Classification identifying the branch Surface Surface Type identifying the branch number.

Condition Category Condition Category (I through V).

Treatment Type
First Row (Crack Treatment) indicates localized treatment (e.g., crack sealing).

Second Row (Surface Treatment) indicates surface treatment (e.g., slurry sealing).

Third Row (Restoration Treatment) indicates surface restoration (e.g., overlay).

Treatment Name of treatments from the "Treatment Descriptions" report.

Yrs. Between Crack Seals First Row - number of years between successive treatment applications specified in the first row (i.e., CRACK treatment).

Yrs. Between Surface
Seals
Second Row - number of years between successive treatment applications specified in the second row (i.e., SURFACE treatment).

Number of Sequential
Seals
Number of times that the treatment application in the second row (i.e., SURFACE treatment) will be performed prior to performing the treatment application in the third row.
75 Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Note that the treatments assigned to each section should not be blindly followed in preparing a road maintenance program. Engineering judgment and project level analysis should be applied to ensure that the treatment is appropriate and cost effective for the section. 76 Decision Tree: Default
Arterial AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3 Surface Treatment MICROSURFACING $23.00 6
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related CAPE SEAL OR MICROSURFACING $25.00 6 III - Good, Load Related 3" AC MILL AND OVERLAY $60.25
IV - Poor CIR W/ 3" AC OVERLAY $85.00
V - Very Poor 12" FDR-C W/ 4" AC OVERLAY $110.00
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
Surface Treatment MICROSURFACING $23.00 6
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related CAPE SEAL OR MICROSURFACING $25.00 6 III - Good, Load Related 3" AC MILL AND OVERLAY $60.25
IV - Poor CIR W/ 3" AC OVERLAY $85.00
V - Very Poor 12" FDR-C W/ 4" AC OVERLAY $110.00
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.50 3 Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $5.82 6
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $56.70 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $26.64
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $56.70
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $103.69
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $207.39
PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.50 3
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class