Minutes — Cloverdale City Council, June 26, 2024

City Council Meeting Minutes - June 26, 2024 - Page 1 of 7 124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707-894-2521
www.cloverdale.net

MINUTES - FINAL

REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND JOINT MEETING OF THE CLOVERDALE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26, 2024
CLOSED SESSION: 4:30 PM

CLOVERDALE CITY HALL
124 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD. CLOVERDALE, CA, 95425
OPEN SESSION: 6:00 PM

CLOVERDALE PERFORMING ART CENTER
209 N. CLOVERDALE BOULEVARD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

CLOSED SESSION

1. OPENING CLOSED SESSION

1.A Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m.

1.B Roll Call

Present: Mayor Lands, Councilmembers: Morgenstern, Wolter

Absent: Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmember Bagby

1.C Closed Session Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions) None.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION AGENDA:

Kristin Fish provided comments on Item 3.A

3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION TO HEAR THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S):

Mayor Lands recessed to Closed Session at 4:33 p.m.

3.A CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case: Leach v. City of Cloverdale
Sonoma County Superior Court, Case No: 24CV02958
Name of Case: Fish v. David Kelley
Sonoma County Superior Court, Case No: 24SC00353
Item was received and filed.

City Council Meeting Minutes - June 26, 2024 - Page 2 of 7 Councilmember Bagby joined Closed Session at 4:44 p.m.

Updated Roll Call:

Present: Mayor Lands, Councilmembers: Morgenstern, Wolter, Bagby

Absent: Vice Mayor Wheeler

3.B CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Labor Negotiator: City Manager Kelley and Consultant Patrick Clark Cloverdale Employee Groups: Cloverdale Classified Association, Cloverdale Police Officers' Association, Cloverdale Dispatchers' Association, and all Unrepresented Employees (Unaffiliated Employees and Executive Management Staff) Councilmember Bagby left Closed Session at 5:50 p.m.

Item was received and filed.

Mayor Lands adjourned Closed Session at 5:52 p.m.

OPEN SESSION - 6:00 PM
A. OPENING PUBLIC SESSION
A.1 Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m.

A.2 Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Lands led the Pledge of Allegiance.

A.3 Roll Call

Present: Mayor Lands, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter

Absent: Vice Mayor Wheeler
A.4 Report Out on Closed Session
None.

A.5 Conflict of Interest Declaration
Councilmember Wolter recused from Item H.2 (Zone 1) and Mayor Lands recused from Item H.2 (Zone 2), due to conflicts of interest.

A.6 Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
None.

B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Daniel Frankston spoke regarding Cannabis taxes.

C. COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Kelley noted the Public written communications sent to Council since the last meeting, listed below in item C.1.

City Council Meeting Minutes - June 26, 2024 - Page 3 of 7 C.1 Correspondence:

E. PROCLAMATIONS / RECOGNITION
None.

F. PRESENTATIONS
None.

G. CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made by Councilmember Bagby, seconded by Councilmember Wolter, to waive reading of the text and adopt the Consent Calendar.

The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes: (4) Mayor Lands, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter No: (0)
Abstain: (0)

Absent: (1) Vice Mayor Wheeler
G.1 Approval of Minutes - May 8, 2024
Action: Approved as submitted
G.2 Approval of Minutes - May 22, 2024
Action: Approved as submitted
G.3 Approval of Minutes - June 12, 2024
Action: Approved as submitted
G.4 Consider Approval of City Council Meeting Cancellations for July 10, 2024, November 27, 2024, and December 25, 2024
Action: Cancellations Approved
G.5 Consider a Resolution Calling and Giving Notice of an Election to be Held on November 5, 2024 and Establishing Estimated Costs for Candidates’ Statements Action: Resolution Approved
City Council Meeting Minutes - June 26, 2024 - Page 4 of 7 RESOLUTION NO. 028-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CLOVERDALE CALLING FOR A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024, FOR THE ELECTION OF TWO (2) AT-LARGE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE ELECTION OF THE VACANT CITY TREASURER POSITION; REQUESTING THAT THE

SONOMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONSOLIDATE THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024,

AND AUTHORIZING THE SONOMA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT AND

CANVASS THE RESULTS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
RESOLUTION NO. 029-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CLOVERDALE ESTABLISHING ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PRINTING, HANDLING, TRANSLATING, AND MAILING THE CANDIDATES STATEMENTS FILED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 027- 2012 FOR THE CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024
G.6 Consider a Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2024-25, Pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California Action: Resolution Approved
RESOLUTION NO. 030-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 G.7 Consider a Resolution revising the classification and pay range for Police Records Technician Action: Resolution Approved
RESOLUTION NO. 031-2024 ENTITELD: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING THE REVISED CLASSIFICATION OF POLICE RECORDS

TECHNICIAN AND THE RELATED PAY RANGE
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
H.1 Consider a Resolution Establishing and Updating the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services and Repealing Previously Adopted and Conflicting Fees and Charges for Such Services
City Manager Kelley introduced the item and Finance Director Holmes presented.

Mayor Lands opened and closed the Public Hearing (Time not noted due to technical issues with the AV equipment)
A motion was made by Councilmember Bagby, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive reading of the text and adopt:

RESOLUTION NO. 032-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF CLOVERDALE ESTABLISHING AND UPDATING THE SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

FOR CITY SERVICES AND REPEALING THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED AND CONFLICTING FEES

AND CHARGES FOR SUCH SERVICES
City Council Meeting Minutes - June 26, 2024 - Page 5 of 7 The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes: (4) Mayor Lands, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter No: (0)
Abstain: (0)

Absent: (1) Vice Mayor Wheeler
H.2 Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District – Public Hearing, Approval of the Annual Engineer’s Report, and Resolutions Authorizing Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25
Finance Director Holmes introduced the item.

Mayor Lands opened and closed the Public Hearing at 6:21 p.m.

Mayor Lands rearranged the order of the resolutions to see the zones in the following order: Zone 3; Zone 4, 5, 6 and 7; Zone 1; Zone 2.

A motion was made by Councilmember Bagby, seconded by Councilmember Wolter, to waive reading of the text and adopt:

RESOLUTION NO. 033-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS, AND

AUTHORIZING THE LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 FOR THE CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR ZONE 3
Additional Public comment: None
The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes: (4) Mayor Lands, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter No: (0)
Abstain: (0)

Absent: (1) Vice Mayor Wheeler
A motion was made by Mayor Lands, seconded by Councilmember Wolter, to waive reading of the text and adopt:

RESOLUTION NO. 034-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 FOR THE CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR ZONES 4, 5, 6 AND 7 Additional Public comment: None
City Council Meeting Minutes - June 26, 2024 - Page 6 of 7 The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes: (4) Mayor Lands, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter No: (0)
Abstain: (0)

Absent: (1) Vice Mayor Wheeler
Councilmember Wolter left the dais at 6:23 p.m.

A motion was made by Mayor Lands, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive reading of the text and adopt:

RESOLUTION NO. 035-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT

DIAGRAM AND THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 FOR THE CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR ZONE 1 Additional Public comment: None
The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes: (3) Mayor Lands, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (1) Councilmember Wolter

Absent: (1) Vice Mayor Wheeler
Councilmember Wolter returned to the dais at 6:24 p.m.

Mayor Lands left the dais at 6:24 p.m.

A motion was made by Councilmember Morgenstern, seconded by Councilmember Wolter, to waive reading of the text and adopt:

RESOLUTION NO. 036-2024 ENTITLED: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Assessment Diagram and the Annual Assessment Amounts, and Authorizing the Levying and Collection of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Zone 2
Additional Public comment: None
The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes: (3) Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter
No: (0)
Abstain: (1) Mayor Lands

Absent: (1) Vice Mayor Wheeler
City Council Meeting Minutes - June 26, 2024 - Page 7 of 7 Mayor lands returned to the dais at 6:26 p.m.

I. NEW BUSINESS
None.

J. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
Subcommittee Agendas, Approved Minutes, and Media are available at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter.

Finance, Administration & Police: Chair Lands and Vice Chair Wolter Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - July 1, 2024
Homelessness Community Advisory Group: Chair Morgenstern and Vice Chair Wheeler Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - October 14, 2024
Joint City/Cloverdale Unified School District: Chair Lands and Vice Chair Morgenstern Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - August 19, 2024
Planning and Sustainability: Chair Bagby and Vice Chair Wheeler Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - August 20, 2024
Public Works and Facilities: Chair Wheeler and Vice Chair Wolter Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - July 23, 2024
K. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
K.1 Oral Reports:

Councilmember Bagby reported.

K.2 Written Reports
Councilmember Bagby submitted.

L. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS, LETTERS OF SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
L.1 Attachment(s):

City Manager Kelley reported.

M. CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
City Manager Kelley reported.

N. COUNCIL DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.

O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lands adjourned the meeting at 6:38 p.m. to the next regular meeting of the Cloverdale City Council scheduled for July 24, 2024.

APPROVED ON: July 24, 2024
______________________
Mike Maloney, City Clerk
124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707-894-2521
www.cloverdale.net
The Cloverdale City Council welcomes public interest, attendance, and in-person participation at meetings.

Open session meetings are held in-person at the Cloverdale Performing Art Center. You may also view the live streams online at www.zoom.us/join, by telephone: 1.669.900.6833, both using Meeting ID: 823 1668 4527, directly at https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82316684527 or on YouTube at cloverdale.net/youtube CLOSED SESSION - 4:30 PM

1. OPENING CLOSED SESSION

1.A Call to Order

1.B Roll Call

1.C Closed Session Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION AGENDA:

Prior to recessing to Closed Session, the Public may speak on Closed Session Items.

3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION TO HEAR THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S):

REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND JOINT MEETING OF THE CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26, 2024
CLOSED SESSION: 4:30 PM

CLOVERDALE CITY HALL
124 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD. CLOVERDALE, CA, 95425
OPEN SESSION: 6:00 PM

CLOVERDALE PERFORMING ART CENTER
209 N. CLOVERDALE BOULEVARD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
1 3.B CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Labor Negotiator: City Manager Kelley and Consultant Patrick Clark Cloverdale Employee Groups: Cloverdale Classified Association, Cloverdale Police Officers' Association, Cloverdale Dispatchers' Association, and all Unrepresented Employees (Unaffiliated Employees and Executive Management Staff) OPEN SESSION - 6:00 PM
A. OPENING PUBLIC SESSION
A.1 Call to Order
A.2 Pledge of Allegiance
A.3 Roll Call
A.4 Report Out on Closed Session
A.5 Conflict of Interest Declaration
A.6 Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person wishing to speak on an item not listed on the agenda may do so at this Dme. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the City Council is not allowed to consider issues or takeaction on any item not listed on the agenda. Three minutes are typically allotted to each speaker.

C. COMMUNICATIONS
Public written communications sent to Council since the last meeting may be discussed at this time.

C.1 Correspondence:

D. STUDENT LIAISON REPORT
None.

E. PROCLAMATIONS / RECOGNITION
None.

F. PRESENTATIONS
None.

October 2023 Survey Results Reminder - Fisher
On Property Tax Increases - Koslowsky
Sales Tax Measure - Frankston
Sock it to Homeowners Who Pay Property Taxes - Koslowsky Vacant lot on south end of Port Cr - Thomas
Sock it to Taxpayers Again - Koslowsky
Cloverdale Tax Measure - Evans
2 G. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items under the Consent Calendar will be considered together by one acDon of the City Council unless any Councilmember or member of the public requests that an item be removed and considered separately.

G.1 Approval of Minutes - May 8, 2024
Recommended Action(s):

Approve the May 8, 2024 Draft Minutes
G.2 Approval of Minutes - May 22, 2024
Recommended Action(s):

Approve the May 22, 2024 Draft Minutes
G.3 Approval of Minutes - June 12, 2024
Recommended Action(s):

Approve the June 12, 2024 Draft Minutes
G.4 Consider Approval of City Council Meeting Cancellations for July 10, 2024, November 27, 2024, and December 25, 2024
Recommended Action(s):

Cancel the Regularly Scheduled City Council meetings of July 10, 2024, November 27, 2024, and December 25, 2024 due to proximity to Federal Holidays.

G.5 Consider a Resolution Calling and Giving Notice of an Election to be Held on November 5, 2024 and Establishing Estimated Costs for Candidates’ Statements Recommended Action(s):

1. Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale calling for a General Municipal Election to be held on November 5, 2024, for the election of two (2) at-large members of the City Council, and the election of the vacant City Treasurer position; Requesting that the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors consolidate the General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election to be held on November 5, 2024, and authorizing the Sonoma County Registrar of Voters to conduct and canvass the results of the General Municipal Election.”

2. Adopt a Resolution Entitled, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale establishing estimated costs for printing, handling, translating, and mailing the Candidates Statements filed pursuant to Resolution No. 027-2012 for the consolidated General Election to be held in the City of Cloverdale on November 5, 2024.”
May 8, 2024 - Draft Minutes
May 22, 2024 - Draft Minutes
June 12, 2024 - Draft Minutes
Agenda Report
Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution - Consolidated Election
Attachment 2 - Exhibit A - ROV's Election Cost Estimate Attachment 3 - Resolution - Estimated Costs for Candidate Statements 3 G.6 Consider a Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2024-25, Pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California Recommended Action(s):

Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Establishing the Appropriation Limit for Fiscal Year 2024-25.”
G.7 Consider a Resolution revising the classification and pay range for Police Records Technician Recommended Action(s):

Adopt a Resolution Entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale approving the revised classification of Police Records Technician and the related pay range.” H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
H.1 Consider a Resolution Establishing and Updating the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services and Repealing Previously Adopted and Conflicting Fees and Charges for Such Services Recommended Action(s):

Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Establishing and Updating the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services and repealing the previously adopted and conflicting fees and charges for such services.”
H.2 Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District – Public Hearing, Approval of the Annual Engineer’s Report, and Resolutions Authorizing Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 Recommended Action(s):

1. Adopt a Resolution Entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Assessment Diagram and the Annual Assessment Amounts, and Authorizing the Levying and Collection of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Zone 1."

2. Adopt a Resolution Entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Assessment Diagram and the Annual Assessment Amounts, and Authorizing the Levying and Collection of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Zone 2." Attachment 4 - Exhibit A - ROV's SOQ Cost Estimate
Agenda Report
Attachment 2 - Appropriations Limit History
Attachment 3 - Price & Population
Attachment 1 - Resolution.pdf
Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Exhibit A - Police Records Tech Revised
Attachment 3 - Exhibit A - Police Records Tech Revised (Red Line Version) Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Exhibit A - Draft Master Fee Schedule
4 3. Adopt a Resolution Entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Assessment Diagram and the Annual Assessment Amounts, and Authorizing the Levying and Collection of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Zone 3."

4. Adopt a Resolution Entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Assessment Diagram and the Annual Assessment Amounts, and Authorizing the Levying and Collection of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Zones 4, 5, 6 and 7." I. NEW BUSINESS
None.

J. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
Subcommittee Agendas, Approved Minutes, and Media are available at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter.

K.1 Oral Reports:

K.2 Written Reports
L. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS, LETTERS OF SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
L.1 Attachment(s):

M. CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Budget Review FY 2024-25
Attachment 2 - Resolution - Zone 1
Attachment 3 - Resolution - Zone 2
Attachment 4 - Resolution - Zone 3
Attachment 5 - Resolution - Zone 4, 5, 6, 7
Attachment 6 - Engineers Report
Councilmember Bagby
AB 1359 Support Letter - Signed
5 Staff may provide written and or verbal informational reports.

N. COUNCIL DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmembers may request agenda items for future Council and or Council Subcommittee meetings.

O. ADJOURNMENT
To the next regular meeting of the Cloverdale City Council scheduled for July 24, 2024.

IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Members of the public may provide comment on an agenda item in-person during the public comment periods. Commenters will have three (3) minutes to speak. City Council is unable to respond directly to quesDons or enter into dialogue with commenters. Comments may also be submiQed prior t o [email protected]. by 12 p.m. the day of the meeDng. Submissions and supplemental attachments are considered public records pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5.

SPECIAL NEEDS ACCOMMODATIONS: In compliance with the Americans with DisabiliDes Act and Title VI, if you need special assistance to parDcipate in this meeDng, please contact the City Clerk's office at [email protected] or 707.894-1712. NoDficaDon at least 72 hours prior to the meeDng will enable the City to make reasonable accommodations are made to provide accessibility to the meeting.

AB 2449: Councilmembers parDcipate in person or teleconference methods consistent with tradiDonal provisions of the Brown Act,Government Code § 54953(b), unless the meeDng is being held pursuant to provisions of AB 2449. If a technical issue arises with Zoom or the dial-in opDon, the meeDng will conDnue unless it is being held pursuant to the provisions of Assembly Bill 2449.

AB 343: Any wriDngs or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspecDon in the City Hall offices located at 124 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, CA 95425 during normal business hours as provided by Assembly Bill 343.

WAIVER WARNING: If you challenge decisions/direcDons of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearings described in this agenda, or in wriQen correspondence delivered to the City of Cloverdale, or prior to, the public hearing.

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
The City Clerk’s Office does hereby declare that, in accordance with California Government Code § 54954.2(a), this agenda for the above stated meeting(s) was posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting (24 hours prior to a Special Meeting) on the outdoor bulletin board at City Hall, 124 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, CA, 95425 and the Cloverdale Performing Art Center, 209 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, CA, 95425, and online at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter. The agenda is also available for public review at City Hall at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting.

Date posted: June 20, 2024 | Time posted: 3:55 p.m. | City Clerk Signature: s/Mike Maloney

CLOVERDALE WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
Interested in receiving useful informaDon and updates about City events, iniDaDves, acDviDes, budget and public meetings? Visit www.cloverdale.net/newsletter and subscribe to "The Cloverdale Weekly Newsletter."

RECREATION SURVEY
6 The City of Cloverdale Parks and RecreaDon Department is seeking community input on potenDal RecreaDon classes, activities, and events. Take the survey at www.cloverdale.net/recsurvey 7 From: Molly Fisher
To: Public Comments
Subject: October 2023 Survey Results reminder
Date: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 2:39:55 PM
Attachments: Screenshot 2024-06-19 at 2.30.31 PM.png
Screenshot 2024-06-19 at 2.30.38 PM.png
Screenshot 2024-06-19 at 2.30.48 PM.png
Dear City of Cloverdale Councilmembers and Staff,
I’m emailing to remind you of the results of the Isom & Associates survey in which you have your answer: voters will probably not approve a 0.75% sales tax increase. 8 Go with 0.5% if you want this to succeed. If you insist on $.075, I’m afraid we will end up with $0. This is what people said in response to the survey.

If we need to increase it again in the future, we will. It’s less harmful to pay to get this on the ballot again than to fail.

Molly Fisher
Cloverdale, CA 95425
9 From: ROB KOSLOWSKY
To: City Council; David Kelley
Cc: Michael Maloney; Kevin Thompson; Public Comments
Subject: On Property Tax Increases
Date: Friday, June 14, 2024 8:17:24 AM
Attachments: Property Tax Proposals_for November 2024 Ballot_RKK draft_June 2024.png Property Tax Proposals_for November 2024 Ballot_RKK draft_June 2024.png Members of Cloverdale’s City Council and City Manager,
There is confusion among many homeowners across town that pay property taxes. One resident wrote to you, prior to the town hall meeting, “As a property owner, I can afford $60 a year to help with infrastructure needs. Please consider my input as you deliberate. Thank you . . .” The communication from the city has been confusing and error-filled, as Mr. Kelley recently acknowledged. Let’s don’t spin the proposed property tax increases, but lay them out clearly for residents. Furthermore, another town hall meeting on proposed tax increases is required, and not a session tacked on to the back end of a two-hour-long council meeting.

For this resident who wrote in, happy to pay an extra $60 annually, the actual property tax increase would be $277 per year on top of the regional BAHFA increase of $120 and the climate bond increase of $100, bringing this homeowner’s property tax increase to around $500. That’s almost 10- times what this Cloverdalian expects.

I implore the City to show its local property tax increase in real dollars with a simple three-tiered summary as follows (or something like this or consider the attached draft graphic):

Assessed Value Maximum Property Tax Increase
<$500,000 <$300 annually
<$750,000 <$450 annually
<$1,000,000 <$600 annually
The same can be done for the other two proposed property tax increases as well. Why make residents read small print or go through a mathematical exercise to figure out their potential tax bill increases? 10 Here’s to open and clear communications with Cloverdale residents.

Respectfully submitted,
…Rob
Rob Koslowsky
Author of The Tubbs Fire.

Also author of The Upstart Startup & Breach of Trust.

Author's page
11 From: David Kelley
To: [email protected]; Todd Lands; Gus Wolter; Melanie Bagby; Brian Wheeler; Marjorie Morgenstern; Gus Wolter - Council
Cc: Kevin Thompson; Public Comments; Alex Mog at Redwood Subject: RE: Sales Tax Measure
Date: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 2:08:55 PM
Dear Mr. Frankston,
Thank you for sharing your thoughtful insights and concerns regarding the proposed 0.75% sales tax measure. We appreciate your engagement and commitment to the future of Cloverdale. I offer my perspective on some of your comments:

Addressing the Structural Operational Budget Deficit:

Your concern about the $1,000,000 annual structural operational budget deficit is valid. The city and I personally acknowledge this deficit. We are actively working on strategies to mitigate (i.e., reduce the deficit). Unfortunately, additional cuts to the budget could lead to severe budget cuts to already strained infrastructure budgets (e.g. Streets Fund) and reduce already limited funding to service groups that provide vital services like the Senior Center. The proposed sales tax increase is part of a broader effort to enhance revenue and maintain essential services without resorting to severe budget cuts. However, it is essential to communicate clearly that the primary focus of the sales tax measure is to fund specific critical needs such as roads, parks, and public safety. Furthermore, as I referenced at the City Council meeting, staff will place review of the budget on the City’s Finnance Administration & Police Subcommittee agenda to enable the subcommittee and members of the community to seek opportunities to reduce currently planned budget expenditures. Please note that our Transparency portal is available to you to review our budget and I welcome you to identify proposed cuts to the budget.

Infrastructure Funding Needs:

Cloverdale indeed faces substantial financial requirements for infrastructure improvements, including $17,000,000 for a new police station and $30,000,000 for road maintenance. While these figures are daunting, the proposed sales tax increase is a step towards generating the necessary funds. It is important to note that the sales tax measure is part of a phased approach. A bond measure planned for 2026 could help to address larger capital projects comprehensively.

Contracting with an Architectural Design Firm:

The city previously contracted with an architectural design firm to complete the design of a new Police Station. This project includes a proposed new location for the city hall (but did not include the design or programming for a new city Hall), aimed at enhancing operational efficiency and meeting the long-term public safety needs of our community. The design of the Police Station could help form a proposal for the bond measure in 2026, which could ensure that we are well-prepared to present a comprehensive and viable plan to the voters. Chief and I are currently reviewing options to reduce the cost of delivering a new public safety facility to the community.

Transparent Allocation of Funds and Voter Threshold:

Councilmember Wolter's commitment to allocating the sales tax revenue with 2/3 for roads, 1/6 for park improvements, and 1/6 for public/pedestrian safety is crucial for transparency and 12 accountability. However, we must also consider the legal implications of detailing planned expenditures in the measure. If the sales tax measure specifies these allocations, it will likely be classified as a special tax, requiring a super majority (two-thirds) voter approval. This higher threshold could pose a significant challenge in securing the necessary votes. Clear communication and strict oversight will be in place to guarantee that the funds are used as intended, while carefully considering the best approach to achieving voter approval.

Impact of Additional Budget Cuts on vulnerable Seniors:

The city is aware that additional budget cuts will have a significant impact on various services.

Funding that could be impacted would likely include discretionary funding for non-profits like the Senior Center, which is critical to meeting the needs of our most vulnerable seniors.

Reducing the already limited funding for the Senior Center would severely affect the services and support provided to our senior community. This potential impact underscores the importance of securing additional revenue through the proposed sales tax measure to avoid such detrimental cuts.

Comparative Tax Rates in Sonoma County:

It is important to consider the tax rates in other cities within Sonoma County. Petaluma and Cotati currently charge a 1% sales tax rate, while the city of Sonoma charges a 0.75% sales tax rate. The City of Healdsburg has a lower rate of 0.50%, but it collects significantly more revenue—$1,288,376 quarterly compared to $247,460 in Cloverdale. This disparity highlights that while Healdsburg's rate is lower, the volume of transactions results in substantially higher revenue. For Cloverdale, increasing the sales tax rate to 0.75% is necessary to generate sufficient revenue to address our critical needs effectively. Lastly, it is my understanding Sebastopol is considering placing an additional sales tax on the ballot this November.

Your Commitment and Involvement:

We value your openness to further discussion and your willingness to be convinced of the benefits of the sales tax measure. The goal is to ensure that the proposed 0.75% sales tax increase will indeed result in significant road improvements and other vital projects without disproportionately burdening Cloverdale's most vulnerable residents.

Your feedback is invaluable in shaping the final proposal and ensuring that it meets the needs and expectations of our community. We are committed to transparent communication, responsible financial management, and engaging with residents like you to achieve the best outcomes for Cloverdale.

We invite you and all residents to continue participating in this important dialogue. Please feel free to reach out with any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,
David
David J. Kelley | City Manager
City of Cloverdale
124 N. Cloverdale Blvd.

Cloverdale, CA 95425
(707) 894-1710 | www.cloverdale.net
13 From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 1:14 PM
To: Todd Lands <[email protected]>; Gus Wolter <[email protected]>; Melanie Bagby <[email protected]>; Brian Wheeler <[email protected]>; Marjorie Morgenstern <[email protected]>
Cc: David Kelley <[email protected]>; Kevin Thompson <[email protected]>; Public Comments <[email protected]>
Subject: Sales Tax Measure
Highlights from 6/12 City Council Meeting regarding Sales Tax/Bond Measure:

The Problems:

1. $1,000,000 per year annual structural operational budget deficit

2. $17,000,000 needed for a new police station

3. $30,000,000 needed for road repair and replacement
The Proposals:

1. Sales Tax Measure – Four councilmembers support placing a .075¢ local sales tax measure on the November ballot;

2. Bond Measure – All 5 councilmembers support placing a bond measure on the 2026 ballot. A study to redesign civic center, including city hall and the police station, would be undertaken and presented in an effort to pass a bond measure in 2026.

The Good:

1. Councilmember Wolter’s commitment (shared by others) to use the sales tax collected so that: 2/3s be used only for roads; 1/6 be used only for park improvements; and 1/6 be used for public/pedestrian safety;

2. Councilmember Bagby’s proposal that a redesign of city hall and 14 the police station be undertaken and that a 2026 bond measure or finance districts be presented for passage.

3. The sentiment expressed by all members to roll up their sleeves and come up with a plan for civic center, and to get the public on board for a bond measure in 2026.

4. The notion expressed by Lands and Wolter that “when we prove that we’re spending your (sales tax) money the right way, we can move on to a bond.”

5. Mayor Lands’ notation that sales tax collected from out-of-town purchases are less regressive because they tend to be larger purchases (vehicles, trailers, equipment).

The Bad:

1. Not a word was uttered with respect to the annual $1,000,000 structural operational budget deficit.

2. The Isom study shows that only 43.1% would support a

0.75% sales tax increase

3. The Isom study was undertaken before voters approved a 0.25% sales tax increase that will take effect on September 1st.

4. A 0.75% sales tax increase would make Cloverdale one of Sonoma’s highest tax rate city, trailing only Cotati and Petaluma.

6. A redesign of civic center would require a bond the size of which lacks public support by > 15%.

The Ugly:

A 0.75% sales tax increase will fail – My gut tells me that a radical increase of this size, which will hit Cloverdale's most vulnerable residents the hardest, will not pass. Isom agrees. The two (nonCloverdale) City Councilmembers I spoke with agree. The folks commenting on the Press Democrat article agree. The vote will come just as voters start paying the (Measure H) 0.25% sales tax increase.

This would put Cloverdale in a higher tax rate than Healdsburg.

The roads will not get fixed – Even if the sales tax measure passes, 15 the Biennial Budget shows a structural operating deficit of 1M a year.

When asked about measures to reduce the deficit without ‘ugly cuts’ the city manager made it clear that “revenue enhancements” are required.

Without a concise plan to eliminate the annual operating deficit, the first

0.5% of any approved sales tax increase would be applied each year towards the deficit that currently exists. That leaves $600,000 per year for park improvements, public/pedestrian safety and to fix the roads which alone requires $30 Million.

No adequate bond measure will be presented or passed – The council is currently unwilling to place even the most modest of bond measures on the ballot citing, in part, other bond initiatives that will be presented to the voters. But there’s no assurance that the 2026 ballot will be any less crowded, and there could be even more revenueseeking measures. A plan to redesign the civic center, including a new police station, city hall, meeting rooms and more is likely to cost far in excess of the highest bond amount surveyed by Isom. Given the council’s reluctance to proceed with even a small bond measure now, I doubt there will be the level of willingness, enthusiasm, and shoe leather required to get a bond passed in 2026 that will adequately address all of Cloverdale’s infrastructure needs.

The Solution:

1. Reduce the Sales Tax measure to a more modest 0.50%, which will give it at least a chance of passing.

2. Either reveal a plan to address the structural operational budget deficit or, in the interest of being open and transparent, state that 2/3s of the additional sales tax sought will be used to cover operational deficits and not for roads, park improvements and public safety.

3. Commission a plan to redesign civic center including city hall and the police station with the goal of getting the public to support a bond measure and/or finance districts in 2026 that will be sufficient for both this undertaking as well as to address the condition of the roads in Cloverdale.
16 On a personal level, I simply cannot and will not support a 0.75% sales tax unless: 1) the funds will only be utilized for roads, park improvements, and public/pedestrian safety in the ratios proposed by Councilmember Wolter; 2) the funds will not be used to cover Cloverdale’s operational budget deficit; and, 3) ALL councilmembers commit to doing whatever is necessary in order to get a measure passed in 2026 that would tackle the infrastructure needs that are not being addressed this year.

My door, my phone and my inbox are wide open to anyone who can convince me that a 0.75% sales tax measure will result in $1,000,000 in road improvements each year (as opposed to deficit reduction), or that the people of Cloverdale are willing to become one of Sonoma’s highest sales tax rate cities.

Daniel Frankston
(415) 202-1880
17 From: ROB KOSLOWSKY
To: ROBERT KOSLOWSKY
Subject: Sock it to Homeowners Who Pay Property Taxes
Date: Monday, June 17, 2024 6:23:39 AM
Attachments: Screen Shot 2024-06-14 at 7.12.01 AM.png
California Homeowners Targeted – Sock it to ‘em!
“The average home price in Healdsburg is $1.03 million, up from $810,000 in 2019.”
- Amie Windsor, Healdsburg aims to lift cap on housing growth, Press Democrat, June 10, 2024.
[Imagine paying property taxes for a home valuation, which could be doubled going forward.]
In 2020, I highlighted how homeowners were targeted by the State with onerous and oppressive building codes [1], which has driven up the price of a new single-family home, in 2024, by a quarter of a million dollars ($250,000). Imagine the property tax bill for such a home purchase.

In November 2024, both homeowners and renters are being targeted with massive tax increases on all fronts to pay for many of the State and County’s bad policy choices. This is the focus of this piece, which is required reading, especially for those living in Cloverdale and the North Bay.

Five More Taxing Decisions for Cloverdale Residents and Many Others Too There are at least five more taxing decisions coming to Cloverdale residents on the November 2024 ballot. What are they?
First, one is a proposed property tax that will “penalize” Cloverdalians for already meeting its low-income housing goals. This regional property tax adds almost $200 per year [2] to pay for the Bay Area Housing Authority’s organization of 52 people and its $100 million budget which plans to take in and then dole out our property tax money for which Cloverdale will see zero benefit. That is more than the current Cloverdale bond money approved in 2010, which are property tax dollars staying in Cloverdale.

Second, a proposed property tax that adds another $150 per year [2] to pay for a statewide climate bond, that duplicates what’s already in place with other existing taxes and fees. California voters are being asked to pay, again, for another $15.5 billion bond to fund duplicate projects related to reducing fire risks, slowing and capturing runoff to improve groundwater infiltration, protecting coastal communities from sea-level rise, and helping big cities lower heat-island effects through greening projects and adding cooling centers, which already exist.

Third, a proposed local property tax that adds $450 per year [2] to pay for local Cloverdale projects. However, it’s a duplicate amount already 18 approved by Cloverdalians in 2018 and for which other sources of funding already pay for these proposed infrastructure projects — Measure M, SB1, the Utility Users Tax, the Cannabis Tax, Developers’ Impact Fees, State and Federal Grants, debt financing, Sales Taxes, donations or bequests, and more. Let’s put those existing sources of funding to good use as well as the ongoing budget funding of emergency reserves by prioritizing critical needs versus nice-to-do projects.

Concurrently, the City and County plans to push through State Constitutional Amendments — ACA 1 and ACA 13 — to lower the voting threshold so that property owners will pay the brunt of all new taxes; with this voting year adding up to another $1,000 to already high property tax bills. A lower voting threshold is demanded by politicians in order to “sock it to homeowners” in 2024, and in future years. This is the ultimate goal for the Sacramento and County politicians, a continuous stream of property tax increases, which is an end run around Prop 13 homeowner protections.

Next, the fourth and fifth taxation schemes are related to sales taxes.

Politicos also want to add a sales tax measure for Cloverdale residents only, coming in at somewhere between 1/4 cent to a full cent [3]. The same promises made in the past are being recycled.

Not to be left out of the tax story for November 2024, the Sonoma County Library Commission seeks to extend its component of our sales tax load.

To date, surplus tax collections have led to a number of unnecessary capital additions, which include 24 x 7 access to pick up one’s books or movies, for example — not even pharmacies and grocers keep such hours.

Is it time to stop offering nice-to-dos and return to the basics of equipping libraries with books?
Other factors for homeowners to consider as they vote for, or against more taxation, is that home insurance costs are increasing another $400 annually for most homeowners [4]; and, car insurance is up 51 percent, which translates to another $400 each year. And of course, the everpresent inflationary pressures created by abusive government spending that continues to drive up all other costs related to home ownership or paying the rent.

Since January 2021, price increases have skyrocketed across the nation as follows:

Shelter UP 21.4%
Groceries UP 21%
Gasoline UP 45%
Car Repairs UP 31%
Energy UP 38% (Much higher for Californians, where electric rates doubled) Consumer Prices UP 19%
19 The increase in car repairs, is an example of how inflation has shifted from rapidly increasing prices on goods to include rapidly increasing prices on services, including labor and the associated “wage-flation.” Furthermore, credit card debt is UP 45% [5] and real average hourly earnings are DOWN 2.6%. On top of that, restaurant surcharges are piling up [6], from between 2 and 4 percent, for anyone who can still afford to eat out.

All of these negatives for consumers and residents has occurred since Biden was inaugurated and his progressive team has sought to implement an ideological wish list of green projects, higher taxation, stifling regulation, and poorly thought out economic policies.

Can Cloverdalians and those across the North Bay, many on fixed or low incomes, afford all of these new tax proposals and to live in a State where it could become significantly easier to impose constant tax burdens, for which there are at least five new ones coming this fall? Sometimes you just have to say, “NO!”
[1] California Homeowners Targeted – Sock it to ‘em! R.K. Koslowsky, submitted February 23, 2020, — Reproduced and updated below (please scroll down). [2] The City’s numbers are on the very low-side. The municipal bureaucracy uses a $500,000 assessed value when showing the homeowners property tax burden. I use the more realistic $700,000 assessed value level for these numbers. For many new singlefamily homes, with or without ADUs, the assessed value is greater than $1,000,000 ($1 million) dollars. So, even under Prop 13, as it exists today, the tax burden will be double what the cities are showing. One could argue it’s a form of sleight-of-hand or misinformation.

See also: Amie Windsor, Healdsburg aims to lift cap on housing growth, Press Democrat, June 10, 2024: “The average home price in Healdsburg is $1.03 million, up from $810,000 in 2019.”
[3] Isom’s survey, paid for by Cloverdale tax dollars, suggests:
- Majority of voters surveyed (just over 50 percent) would support both a sales tax and a property tax (in the form of a bond measure for which only property owners would pay). - Support is below the 2/3rds (bond) and above the 50% (sales tax) voter approval thresholds.

The City instructed Isom to use the unrealistic lower numbers [2] when surveying Cloverdale residents.
[4] The largest request for rate increases — up to 26.9% higher — was granted in March [2024] to the General Insurance Co., which ranks 10th in California market share . . . It was followed by State Farm and the Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club, whose rate hike requests of up to 20% each were approved . . . A subsidiary of Travelers, Standard Fire Insurance Co., asked for a hike in rates of up to 21.7% and received approval on a maximum 15.3%.
- Susan Wood, Insurance rates surging across state, NBBJ, June 6 2024.

AND
20 David W. Chen, Affordable housing threatened: Soaring insurance costs across U.S. could derail plans for development, New York Times, June 8, 2024. [5] Cora Lewis, Credit card delinquencies are rising, AP, June 10, 2024. [6] Sara Edwards, Restaurant surcharges may stay put, Press Democrat, June 8, 2024. ================ Reproduced from 2020 and Updated
=================
California Homeowners Targeted – Sock it to ‘em!
Some faction in State government had an idea to pick on homeowners.

Apparently property owners are the easiest group to coerce, while incrementally making them pay for the State’s experimental policies and continuing unveiling of oppressive building codes and executive orders.

Many bureaucrats hide behind power point charts, which don’t provide accurate information for homeowners, let alone make it easy to understand.

One figure, in particular, reveals the scope of a California Energy Commission (CEC) decision to focus on residential construction, a very small part of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions total. However, unlike the CEC, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other reporting agencies break out “electricity” as its own sector. When this is done, the combined commercial and residential sectors represent an even smaller 11 percent of the GHG total, versus the CEC-CARB metric of 25 percent.

State leaders are not shy in targeting unsuspecting property taxpayers through building code changes. They write, “Transportation, industry, and agriculture will be the hardest sectors to decarbonize by 2050 [1], so the buildings sector must exceed 80 percent reductions in order to meet the state’s goal.”
Sock it to Me!
Not only are homeowners and renters (residential buildings) being targeted, but they are also being forced to compensate for other sectors, such as industry and transportation. As the sixties television show, Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-in, used to say, “Sock it to me!”
And they’re socking it to us.

Since the State’s largest sectors cannot or will not meet arbitrary greenhouse gas reduction targets, owners of residences will overcompensate for not enough people buying electric vehicles and industry not making significant greenhouse gas reductions.

Sock it to first-time homebuyers: New homeowners must absorb another $250,000 tab to the price of their dream house to accommodate 21 building code updates, plus potentially lose ALL of their gas appliance options.

Sock it to existing homeowners: Residents will be faced with a minimum $136,000 tab to retrofit their homes to all-electric service as PG&E is forced to turn off the gas community by community. Some cities in Sonoma County, to curry political favor with State leaders, have already invoked unnecessary natural gas bans – Windsor and Santa Rosa. Such bans may be overturned for now, but this may only be a pause in government overreach until the politico-activists regroup.

Sock it to every homeowner in the State: Homeowners get no credit for the reduction in fuel combustion since the turn of the century. It turns out, according to the California Air Resources Board, between 2000 and 2016, emissions from fuel combustion in California’s residential buildings fell 18 percent [3]. Efficiency gains provided by the people led to this reduction. Like the call to reduce water use by 20 percent during periods of drought, the people of California achieved major greenhouse gas reductions without being targeted.

The government simply brushes this great progress off, “This is encouraging but falls short of the pace needed to decarbonize the building sector in line with the state’s climate goals.”
What? How are these arbitrary metrics defined and who is measuring them? [4, 5]
Today: All-electric reach codes and natural gas bans.

Tomorrow: Gasoline transport made illegal, Costly all-electric home retrofits.

Graphic courtesy authenticmedicine.com and R.K.Koslowsky adaptation, 2020.

Sock it to me. It seems that homeowners who volunteered to do the right thing in the past are being penalized in 2024 with more and oppressive 22 regulation, higher taxes and fees, exorbitant “all-electric” upgrade costs, loss of energy diversity, and the removal of a safe and secure environment in which to live.

This is not a laugh-in, but a bad joke. Consider us all “socked.” “Natural gas is a practical and attainable green energy choice that is readily available today. Alternative and renewable energy sources currently meet only 6% of our nation’s energy needs. Natural gas, on the other hand, is a critical component of a global solution that can have an immediate positive environmental impact. Natural gas is an abundant, domestic resource. 98.5% of the natural gas used in the United States comes from North America. 88% is produced in the U.S., and 10.5% is produced in Canada.”
– “Go Green With Charlottesville Gas,” a Virginia-based utility, pulled from web, Feb 2020
“The all-electric reach code is NOT economical and therefore should be declared invalid and amended.”
– Author’s conclusion
[1] Z. Subin, Long-Term Energy Scenarios In California: Implications for Building Decarbonization, Energy + Environmental Economics (E3), June 14, 2018, IEPR Workshop on Achieving Zero Emission Buildings.
[2] California Air Resources Board, “California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory - 2018 Edition, Economic Sector Characterization,” accessed Sept. 4, 2018 at https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/tables/ghg_inventory_by_sector_all_00-16.xlsx [3] “While voluntary actions have achieved some efficiencies, significant potential remains.

The Energy Commission’s Existing Buildings Energy Efficiency Action Plan provides a 10- year roadmap to activate market forces and transform California’s existing residential, commercial, and public buildings into high-performing and energy-efficient ones.” – California Energy Commission, Achieving Energy Efficiency.

Each existing homeowner could easily pay $136,000 for each of their California properties to bring them in line with the 10-year roadmap.
[4] The CEC’s own tracking reports, highlighted in Figures 1b, 8, shows overall GHG emissions dropping and residential methane production doesn’t even warrant a mention. https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-
12/Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Reductions_ada.pdf
Rob Koslowsky
Author of The Tubbs Fire.

Also author of The Upstart Startup & Breach of Trust.

Author's page
23 From: [email protected]
To: City Council
Subject: Vacant lot on south end of Port Cr
Date: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 1:15:42 PM
This is probably the third or fourth time I have had a discussion with city officials about this piece of property on Port Cr. When Christopherson built the Bungalow almost 20 years ago, he had planned to put additional houses on this piece of property. The property was razed and prepped for construction. Subsequently it was determined that the spot could not support construction.

So, pretty much the property has been left alone since. The are weeds along the sidewalk that are a foot high. There is also grass that needs to be mowed, especially with fire season starting. I believe the city manager has tried to contact Christopherson, but there has been little maintenance on this property. I believe once Hector and his staff did trim along the sidewalk. It really needs attention both for aesthetic and safety reasons.

What is the next step? Last year a fire crew trimmed the trees at the top of the hill, but only went about third of the way down. Houses that border this property do mow grass close to their homes for safety reasons.

My questions are:

Did the city manager or any other county staff ever attempt to contact Christopherson? If so, what was the outcome?
What is Christopherson’s responsibility regarding this property? If Christopherson fails to respond, what options does the city have? An obvious solution would be for the Christopherson to sign the property over to city (that is if the city wants it).

I am hoping this latest attempt to draw attention to this problem will get some results-not just this once, but on an on-going basis.

Respectfully
Millie Thomas
24 Sock it to Taxpayers Again
ROB KOSLOWSKY <[email protected]>
Mon 6/24/2024 6:25 AM
To:ROBERT KOSLOWSKY <[email protected]>
Sock it to Taxpayers Again
“Since 1978, public employee unions and other beneficiaries of government spending have repeatedly tried to repeal Prop. 13’s barriers and make it easier to enact new taxes.”
- Dan Walters, State tax laws could land in court postelection, Press Democrat, May 12, 2024 “Californians are fed up with the state’s high taxes, which has bought them nothing but government dysfunction,” writes the Wall Street Journal [1]. “Instead of trying to dupe and disenfranchise voters, how about listening to them?”
I couldn’t agree more. Our governor is invoking ‘lawfare’ to target hard-working residents and taxpayers. He is pursuing a lawsuit “to block a citizen initiative from this November’s ballot that would make it harder to raise taxes.” Mr. Newsom, instead, wants to make it easier for the state legislature, county supervisors, and local town councils [2] to raise taxes whenever they want another nice-to-do project started instead of addressing needed infrastructure improvements [3].

Specifically, the governor-sponsored lawsuit seeks to remove the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act from the November ballot, an initiative that would raise the threshold for localities to pass all special taxes to two-thirds, the oft-referred to 67-percent voting threshold.

Make It Easier to Raise Taxes?
The last thing voters want from their elected officials is to make it easier to raise taxes, instead of dealing with budget cost management and supporting necessary services that benefit the community. This sentiment is bolstered by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) that reports, “When we asked if most Americans demand more from the government than they are willing to pay for, most Californians—whether they feel they pay too much in taxes or the right amount—said yes.”
Extending its work [4], a PPIC survey shows that 71% of likely voters say they pay more in taxes than they should: “That’s by far the largest share in the 21 years that the question has been asked. A record 56% also said they’d prefer to pay lower taxes and have fewer services. Disapproval of Mr. Newsom also hit a new high.” 6/24/24, 8:58 AM Sock it to Taxpayers Again - Michael Maloney - Outlook about:blank 1/4
25 Californians are fed up with the state’s high taxes, which has brought them government dysfunction, caused by throwing more good money after bad. From bullet trains to nowhere at the State level, to being duped by DEMA Management & Consultant billings at the county level (Sonoma), to bait-and-switch water infrastructure projects at the local level (Cloverdale), the urge to target residents with more taxation and greater regulation is not the answer.

As the Wall Street Journal wrote: “Instead of trying to dupe and disenfranchise voters, how about listening to them?”
6/24/24, 8:58 AM Sock it to Taxpayers Again - Michael Maloney - Outlook about:blank 2/4
26 Mr. Newsom is using lawfare to block voters initiatives to stop tax increases. During the week of May 6th, Mr. Newsroom “urged California’s high court to block a November ballot initiative that would make it harder for regulatory agencies to raise taxes by stealth, as the cap-and-trade program and fixed utility charges do.” Even so, he “rightly noted that ‘we have among the highest tax rates in the United States of America for high wage earners. We have among the highest tax rates . . . for corporate tax rates,’ and ‘we have to live within our means.’ But don’t buy his vow of frugality. His budget [proposal ignores] the $45 billion shortfall with accounting gimmicks such as shifting spending to special funds and stealth tax increases.” - Gavin Newsom Says No New Taxes, WSJ Editorial Board, May 13, 2024.

BREAKING News, June 20, 2024 - Citizens’ voices silenced on raising taxes:

California’s Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Governor by preventing a November 5, 2024 ballot initiative that would have limited Sacramento’s ability to raise taxes. As the Wall Street Journal reported: “Mr. Newsom and former state Democratic Party chairman John Burton last year asked the state Supreme Court to bar from the November ballot an initiative that would make it harder to raise taxes . . .

Prop. 13’s requirement that tax increases be approved by a two-thirds legislative majority is no longer a check on avaricious politicians and unions . . . The citizen initiative backed by the California Business Roundtable required that most regulatory fees and charges be approved by the Legislature and voters. It also required voters to approve tax increases passed by the Legislature, and it raised the threshold to twothirds for localities to pass special taxes . . . It was also voters’ best hope to stop the progressive tax-and-spend ratchet . . . The Court will 'typically review constitutional challenges to an initiative after an election in order to avoid disrupting the electoral process and the exercise of the franchise,’ wrote [Justice Goodwin Liu]. But the Court made an exception in this case. Hmmm.” - Direct Democracy Dies in California, WSJ Editorial Board, June 21, 2024. [1] A Voter Revolt Grows in California: Newsom and Democrats try to block anti-tax and anti-crime initiatives from the November ballot, WSJ Editorial Board, June 17, 2024.
[2] City of Cloverdale — Letter of Support for ACA 13, sent to Assemblyman Woods, 08.28.2023: “The City of Cloverdale supports ACA 13 (Ward) . . . in order to make it easier “to pass revenue measures . . . [T]he City of Cloverdale supports ACA 13.” Concurrently, the City and County plans to push through Constitutional Amendments — ACA 1 and ACA 13 — to lower the voting threshold so that property owners will pay the brunt of all new taxes; with this voting year adding up to another $1,000 to already high property tax bills. A lower voting threshold is demanded by politicians in order to “sock it to homeowners” in 2024, and in future years. This is the ultimate goal for the Sacramento and County politicians, a continuous stream of property tax increases, which is an end run around Prop 13 homeowner protections.
[3] Cloverdale voters seek to understand the rationale behind securing a $2-million-dollar interest payment needed for a $7-million-dollar loan repayment. The bulk of these interest payments, backed primarily by the water and sewer departments, have further deferred the City’s water improvement plans. For example:

1. Upgraded water line improvements have been delayed to build a solar system,

2. New wells and water storage tank projects have been delayed to update air-conditioning systems of city buildings, and 6/24/24, 8:58 AM Sock it to Taxpayers Again - Michael Maloney - Outlook about:blank 3/4
27 3. Chlorine tanks to ensure clean water for residents have been deferred because of lighting upgrades.

It’s not only the loss of $2M to interest payments as a major concern, but it’s also the delay caused by not starting these crucial water projects that residents grudgingly approved with multi-year, double-digit rate increases, just two short years ago. It makes the cynic come forward and wonder if the loan justification was made easier by duping voters with double-digit rate increases over a five-year period. Plus the city can virtue signal that it supports renewable energy. Of course, to do so, it’s using water revenues to produce solar power. [4] “Overwhelming majorities of adults (71%) think California ranks near the top or is above average in terms of state and local tax burden per capita versus other states.”
- Rachel Lawler, Most Californians Believe They Are Overtaxed by an Unfair System, PPIC, April 18, 2023. https://www.ppic.org/blog/most-californians-believe-they-are-overtaxed-by-an-unfair-system/ Rob Koslowsky
Author of The Tubbs Fire.

Also author of The Upstart Startup & Breach of Trust.

Author's page
6/24/24, 8:58 AM Sock it to Taxpayers Again - Michael Maloney - Outlook about:blank 4/4
28 From: Sally Evans
To: City Council
Subject: Cloverdale Tax Measure
Date: Monday, June 24, 2024 3:55:39 PM
City Council Members,
Please consider a half-cent sales tax, and not a three-quarter cent tax for the local ballot measure. A half cent tax is much more likely to be agreeable to residents, and to pass. We cannot risk the measure being voted down.

Sally C. Evans
102 Plumeria Ct.

Cloverdale, CA
707-894-4448
29 124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707-894-2521
www.cloverdale.net

MINUTES - DRAFT

REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND JOINT MEETING OF THE CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WEDNESDAY, MAY 8, 2024

CLOVERDALE PERFORMING ART CENTER
209 N. CLOVERDALE BOULEVARD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

CLOSED SESSION
124 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD.

CLOVERDALE, CA, 95425
5:00 PM

1. OPENING CLOSED SESSION

1.A Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 5 p.m.

1.B Roll Call

Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter

Absent: None.

1.C Closed Session Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions) None.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION AGENDA:

None.

3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION TO HEAR THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S):

Mayor Lands recessed to Closed Session at 5:01 p.m.

3.A CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Labor Negotiator: City Manager Kelley and Consultant Patrick Clark Cloverdale Employee Groups: Cloverdale Classified Association, Cloverdale Police Officers' Association, Cloverdale Dispatchers' Association, and all Unrepresented Employees (Unaffiliated Employees and Executive Management Staff) Item received and filed.

Mayor Lands adjourned Closed Session at 5:56 p.m.
30 OPEN SESSION
209 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD.

CLOVERDALE, CA, 95425
6:00 PM
A. OPENING PUBLIC SESSION
A.1 Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.

A.2 Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Lands led the Pledge of Allegiance.

A.3 Roll Call

Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter

Absent: None.

A.4 Report Out on Closed Session
None.

A.5 Conflict of Interest Declaration
None.

A.6 Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
None.

B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Rob Koslowsky provided accolades to the Parks Department and budget suggestions C. COMMUNICATIONS
None.

D. STUDENT LIAISON REPORT
Student Liaison Gallego reported.

City Clerk Maloney reported.

E. PROCLAMATIONS
E.1 Professional Municipal Clerks Week
Vice Mayor Wheeler read the proclamation. City Clerk Maloney presented.

Recipient(s): Mike Maloney, Cloverdale City Clerk
E.2 Lyme and Tick-Borne Diseases Awareness Month
Councilmember Morgenstern read the proclamation. Emily Handelman presented.

Recipients: Emily Handelman
31 F. PRESENTATIONS
F.1 Bay Area Housing Finance Authority (BAHFA) and 2024 Regional Affordable Housing Bond City Manager Kelley introduced the item, and Director Whitman of the Sonoma County Community Development Commission about the Bay Area Housing Finance Authority presented and responded to Councilmember inquiries and comments.

Public Comments:

Rob Koslowsky commented on the item
G. CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made by Councilmember Bagby, seconded by Councilmember Wolter, to waive reading of the text and adopt the Consent Calendar.

The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter No: (0) None

Absent: (0) None
Abstain: (0) None
G.1 Minutes Approval - April 24, 2024
Action: Approved as submitted.

G.2 Minutes Approval - April 25, 2024
Action: Approved as submitted.

G.3 Ordinance repealing and replacing Cloverdale Municipal Code Chapter 5.36, Rent Control in Mobile Home Parks, to Adopt New Rent Control Regulations for Mobile Home Parks.

Action: Conducted second reading, by title only, and adopted Ordinance:

ORDINANCE NO. 755-2024 ENTITLED: ORDINANCE OF THE CLOVERDALE CITY COUNCIL REPEALING AND REPLACING CLOVERDALE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 5.36, RENT

CONTROL IN MOBILE HOME PARKS, TO ADOPT NEW RENT CONTROL REGULATIONS FOR MOBILE HOME PARKS.

H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

I. NEW BUSINESS
I.1 General Fund, Water and Waste Water Reserves Balances as of June 30, 2023 City Manager Kelley introduced the item.

J. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
Subcommittee Agendas, Approved Minutes, and Media are available at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter.
32 Finance, Administration & Police: Chair Lands and Vice Chair Wolter Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - May 6, 2024
Homelessness Community Advisory Group: Chair Morgenstern and Vice Chair Wheeler Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - June 10, 2024
Joint City/Cloverdale Unified School District: Chair Lands and Vice Chair Morgenstern Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - August 19, 2024
Planning and Sustainability: Chair Bagby and Vice Chair Wheeler Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - June 18, 2024
Public Works and Facilities: Chair Wheeler and Vice Chair Wolter Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - May 28, 2024
K. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
None.

L. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS, LETTERS OF SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
None.

M. CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
City Manager Kelley reported.

City Attorney Mog reported and responded to Councilmember Inquiries.

N. COUNCIL DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.

O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lands adjourned at 7:29 p.m. to the next regular meeting of the Cloverdale City Council scheduled for May 22, 2024.

APPROVED ON:
____________________________
Mike Maloney, City Clerk
33 City Council Meeting Minutes - May 22, 2024 - Page 1 of 4 124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707-894-2521
www.cloverdale.net

MINUTES - DRAFT

REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND JOINT MEETING OF THE CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WEDNESDAY, MAY 22, 2024
6:00 PM

CLOVERDALE PERFORMING ART CENTER
209 N. CLOVERDALE BOULEVARD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
A. OPENING PUBLIC SESSION
A.1 Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.

A.2 Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Lands led the pledge of allegiance.

A.3 Roll Call

Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter

Absent: None.

A.4 Conflict of Interest Declaration
None.

A.5 Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
None.

B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Adina Flores spoke regarding opposition of Measure J.

Robert Koslowsky spoke regarding Cloverdale Tax Measures.

C. COMMUNICATIONS
C.1 Public Correspondence
Written Correspondence from the following included in the Agenda Packet:

Koslowsky (x3)
Opatz
Ziviani
Thomas
Fisher
Greenwald
34 City Council Meeting Minutes - May 22, 2024 - Page 2 of 4 D. STUDENT LIAISON REPORT
Student Liaison Gallego reported.

E. PROCLAMATIONS
E.1 Public Works Week
Councilmember Morgenstern read the proclamation.

Cole Timmer, Cloverdale Utility Maintenance Worker and Bobby Spagnola, Cloverdale Engineering Technician, accepted the proclamation on behalf of the Cloverdale Public Works Department.

F. PRESENTATIONS
F.1 Presentation by Sonoma County Supervisor James Gore providing an update on the Potter Valley Project / Eel Russian Project Authority.

James Gore, Sonoma County Supervisor and Brad Sherwood, Assistant General Manager Sonoma Water, presented and responded to Councilmember comments and questions.

Public Comments:

Adina Flores provided comments.

Chris Coulombe provided comments.

Linda Cade provided comments.

James Gore responded to Public Comments.

City Council provided comments.

James Gore provided additional comments on other Cloverdale projects.

Mayor Lands Recessed the meeting at 7:28 p.m. and reconvened at 7:33 p.m.

F.2 Presentation by Sonoma County Library Director Erika Thibault and Cloverdale Library Commissioner Brooke Greene providing a State of the Library Address and Update on the Sonoma County Library System and Cloverdale Regional Library.

Erika Thibault, Sonoma County Library Director and Brooke Greene, Cloverdale Library Commissioner presented.

Public Comments:

Rob Koslowsky provided comments
Dave Delgardo provided comments
Councilmembers provided comments.

G. CONSENT CALENDAR
Rob Koslowsky requested in writing for item G.1 be pulled from the Consent Calendar for individual consideration.

Mayor Lands granted the request.
35 City Council Meeting Minutes - May 22, 2024 - Page 3 of 4 No other items agendized on the Consent Calendar so Mayor Lands moved directly to item G.1.

G.1 Professional Services Agreement with Coastland Civil Engineering Inc. for the engineering building inspection and plan check services associated with staffing the Building Department
City Manager Kelley introduced the item and Assistant City Manager Thompson reported.

A motion was made by Councilmember Bagby, seconded by Vice Mayor Wheeler, to waive reading of the text and adopt:

RESOLUTION NO. 021-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CLOVERDALE APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH COASTLAND

CIVIL ENGINEERING FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN AND SERVICES, BUILDING INSPECTION AND

PLAN CHECK SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

AGREEMENT IN A FORM APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY
Public Comments:

Rob Koslowsky provided comments
The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter No: (0) None.

Abstain: (0) None.

Absent: (0) None.

H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

I. NEW BUSINESS
None.

J. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
Subcommittee Agendas, Approved Minutes, and Media are available at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter.

Finance, Administration & Police: Chair Lands and Vice Chair Wolter Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - June 3, 2024
Homelessness Community Advisory Group: Chair Morgenstern and Vice Chair Wheeler Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - June 10, 2024
Joint City/Cloverdale Unified School District: Chair Lands and Vice Chair Morgenstern Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - August 19, 2024
Planning and Sustainability: Chair Bagby and Vice Chair Wheeler Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - June 18, 2024
36 City Council Meeting Minutes - May 22, 2024 - Page 4 of 4 Public Works and Facilities: Chair Wheeler and Vice Chair Wolter Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - May 28, 2024
K. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Councilmembers may provide written and or verbal informational reports and updates on regional boards, committees, and community activities.

K.1 Written Reports:

Councilmember Report
L. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS, LETTERS OF SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
None.

M. CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None.

N. COUNCIL DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.

O. TOWN HALL
O.1 Town Hall Workshop to Discuss Placement of a Potential Revenue Measure on the Ballot for the November 2024 General Election and Provide Direction to City Staff on Next Steps City Manager Kelley introduced the item and Cloverdale Executive Staff members and City Council presented on the following:

1. Budget and key budget, capital projects and service priorities/needs

2. Conduct Town Hall meeting as a public workshop to gather information and feedback from our community regarding the potential placement of a revenue measure on the ballot for the November 2024 general election.

3. Discuss Revenue Measure Survey conducted by Isom Advisors presented to City Council on March 22nd.

4. Discuss options for a potential Revenue Measure including but not limited to a sales tax measure and/or a bond measure to fund critical city services and projects.

5. Provide direction to staff on next steps including whether to develop a ballot measure and place a Revenue Measure on the ballot for the 2024 general election.

Council and Staff responded to questions, comments, concerns, and suggestions from members of the public.

Councilmember Bagby left the meeting at 9:45 p.m.

P. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lands adjourned the meeting at 10:08 p.m to the next regular meeting of the Cloverdale City Council scheduled for June 12, 2024.

APPROVED ON:
____________________________
Mike Maloney, City Clerk
37 City Council Meeting Minutes - June 12, 2024 - Page 1 of 6 124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707-894-2521
www.cloverdale.net

MINUTES - DRAFT

REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND JOINT MEETING OF THE CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 12, 2024
6:00 PM

CLOVERDALE PERFORMING ART CENTER
209 N. CLOVERDALE BOULEVARD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

CLOSED SESSION
124 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD.

CLOVERDALE, CA, 95425
5:00 PM

1. OPENING CLOSED SESSION

1.A Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 5 p.m.

1.B Roll Call

Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter

Absent: None

1.C Closed Session Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions) None.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION AGENDA:

None.

3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION TO HEAR THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S):

Mayor Lands recessed into Closed Session at 5:01 p.m.

The item was received and filed.

Mayor Lands adjourned Closed Session at 6 p.m.
38 City Council Meeting Minutes - June 12, 2024 - Page 2 of 6

OPEN SESSION
209 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD.

CLOVERDALE, CA, 95425
6:00 PM
A. OPENING PUBLIC SESSION
A.1 Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 6:08 p.m.

A.2 Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Lands led the Pledge of Allegiance
A.3 Roll Call

Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter

Absent: None.

A.4 Report Out on Closed Session
None.

A.5 Conflict of Interest Declaration
None.

A.6 Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
None.

B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Kristin Fish regarding vegetation management.

Rob Koslowsky regarding potential November ballot taxations.

C. COMMUNICATIONS
C.1 Public Correspondence (Written)
-Town Hall Follow Up - David Delgardo
- 5/22/24 Town Hall - Molly Fisher
- Town Hall / Sales Tax / Bond Measure - Daniel Frankston - The Feds are Coming for Your Air Conditioner - Koslowsky D. STUDENT LIAISON REPORT
None.

E. PROCLAMATIONS / RECOGNITION
E.1 LGBTAIA+ Pride Month
Mayor Lands read the proclamation.

Recipient: Reece Foxen
39 City Council Meeting Minutes - June 12, 2024 - Page 3 of 6 E.2 Boys and Girls Club - Youth of the Year recognitions Recipient: Jefferson Elementary School: Vannia Gonzalez-Martinez Washington Middle School: Scarlett Johnston
Cloverdale High School: Tony Munoz
F. PRESENTATIONS
None.

G. CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made by Councilmember Bagby, seconded by Vice Mayor Wheeler, to waive reading of the text and adopt the Consent Calendar.

The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter No: (0) None
Abstain: (0) None

Absent: (0) None
G.1 Cloverdale Police Department Military Equipment Use Policy 708 Annual Report Action: Policy Approved
Consider approving the Cloverdale Police Department Military Equipment Use Policy 708 Annual Report in accordance with Assembly Bill 481.

G.2 Designating the Authority and Updating the Process and Procedures in the Determination of Disability Retirements for Local Safety Employees Action: Resolution Approved
RESOLUTION NO. 022-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF CLOVERDALE UPDATING THE PROCESS AND PROCEDURES FOR THE DETERMINATION

OF DISABILITY RETIREMENTS FOR LOCAL SAFETY EMPLOYEES AND DELEGATING THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE SUCH DETERMINATION.

G.3 Amending the City Personnel System to update the classification of Finance and Human Resource Manager and approve the Salary Range for the Classification Action: Resolution Approved
RESOLUTION NO. 023-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CLOVERDALE AMENDING CITY PERSONNEL SYSTEM TO UPDATE THE CLASSIFICATION OF

FINANCE AND HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGER AND APPROVE THE SALARY RANGE FOR THE CLASSIFICATION.
40 City Council Meeting Minutes - June 12, 2024 - Page 4 of 6 G.4 Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District – Continuing Public Hearing to June 26, 2024
Action: Continuation Approved
The Public Hearing moved to a date certain of June 26, 2024.

G.5 Roadway Improvement Project list for fiscal year 2024/2025 funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
Action: Resolution Approved
RESOLUTION NO. 024-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025 FUNDED BY SB 1:

THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017.

G.6 Sign onto the Town of Windsor’s Memorandum of Agreement Establishing the Town of Windsor Biosolids Collaborative
Action: Resolution Approved
RESOLUTION NO. 025-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE AUTHORIZING SIGNING ONTO THE TOWN OF WINDSOR’S MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE TOWN OF WINDSOR BIOSOLIDS COLLABORATIVE.

H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

I. NEW BUSINESS
I.1 Discussion and Consideration of the Adoption of City of Cloverdale Biennial Budget for the Fiscal Years 2024-25 and 2025-26
City Manager Kelley introduced the item and Finance Director Holmes reported.

Councilmembers provided comments and recommendations.

Staff responded to Councilmember inquires and comments.

Public Comments:

Rob Koslowsky provided comments on the proposed budget and Measure R funds.

City Manager Kelley responded to Public and Council comments.

A motion was made by Councilmember Bagby, seconded by Councilmember Wolter, to waive reading of the text and adopt as amended:

RESOLUTION NO. 026-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEARS 2024/25 AND 2025/26 BIENNIAL BUDGET 41 City Council Meeting Minutes - June 12, 2024 - Page 5 of 6 The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter No: (0) None
Abstain: (0) None

Absent: (0) None
I.2 Consideration of Resolution to Place a Measure on November 5, 2024 Ballot to Extend the Term of and Modify the City’s Urban Growth Boundary City Attorney Mog presented and responded to Councilmember inquiries and comments.

A motion was made by Councilmember Baby, seconded by Vice Chair Wheeler, to waive reading of the text and adopt:

RESOLUTION NO. 027-2024 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CLOVERDALE CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF AN ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024, TO CONSIDER THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE MEASURE TO EXTEND THE TERM OF AND MODIFY THE CITY’S URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY; ORDERING THE

SUBMITTAL OF THE MEASURE TO THE VOTERS AT THE ELECTION, AND REQUESTING THAT

THE SONOMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONSENT TO THE CONSOLIDATION OF

THIS ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION ON THE SAME DATE AND DIRECT THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT THE ELECTION.

The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Bagby, Morgenstern, Wolter No: (0) None
Abstain: (0) None

Absent: (0) None
Mayor Lands recessed the meeting at 7:29 p.m. and reconvened at 7:34 p.m.

I.3 Placement of a Potential Revenue Measure on the Ballot for the November 2024 General Election and Provide Direction to City Staff
City Manager Kelley presented
Council discussed and provided comments.

Public Comments:

Reece Foxen provided suggestions and comments and responded to Councilmember inquiries.

Daniel Frankston provided suggestions, comments, and inquiries.

Susan Cummings provided suggestions and comments.

Council deliberated and provided direction to staff.

City Attorney Mog responded to Councilmember inquiries. 42 City Council Meeting Minutes - June 12, 2024 - Page 6 of 6 J. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
Subcommittee Agendas, Approved Minutes, and Media are available at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter.

Finance, Administration & Police: Chair Lands and Vice Chair Wolter Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - July 1, 2024
Homelessness Community Advisory Group: Chair Morgenstern and Vice Chair Wheeler Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - June 10, 2024 and October 14, 2024 Joint City/Cloverdale Unified School District: Chair Lands and Vice Chair Morgenstern Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - August 19, 2024
Planning and Sustainability: Chair Bagby and Vice Chair Wheeler Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - August 20, 2024 (June 18, 2024 Cancelled) Public Works and Facilities: Chair Wheeler and Vice Chair Wolter Last Meeting Agenda | Next Meeting - June 25, 2024
K. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Vice Mayor Wheeler reported.

K.1 Written Reports:

Councilmember Bagby.

L. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS, LETTERS OF SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
L.1 Community Facility Grant Program - Alexander Valley Health - Letter of Support City Manager Kelley introduced the Letter of Support.

L.2 Assembly Bill 1886 - Housing Element Law - Notice of Opposition City Manager Kelley introduced the Notice of Opposition.

L.3 Senate Bill 1037 - Planning and Zoning Housing Element - Notice of Opposition City Manager Kelley introduced the Notice of Opposition.

M. CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
City Manager Kelley and City Attorney Mog reported.

N. COUNCIL DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Comprehensive list of equipment (Gas) to Public Works and Facilities Subcommittee.

Letter of Appreciation for the Art Walk contributors and organizers.

O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lands adjourned the meeting at 8:29 p.m. to the next regular meeting of the Cloverdale City Council scheduled for June 26, 2024.

APPROVED ON:
_______________________
Mike Maloney, City Clerk
43 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item:

Meeting Date:

G.4
May 25, 2022
Agenda Section:

Consent
Staff Contact:

Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Agenda Item Title:

Approval of City Council Meeting Cancellations for July 10, 2024, November 27, 2024, and December 25, 2024 _______________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):

Cancel the Regularly Scheduled City Council meetings of July 10, 2024, November 27, 2024, and December 25, 2024 due to proximity to Federal Holidays.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary:

The July 10, 2024 meeting is in proximity to the July 4th, 2024 holiday.

The November 27, 2024 meeting is in proximity to the November 28, 2024 Thanksgiving holiday.

The December 25, 2024 meeting is on the December 25, 2024 Christmas holiday.

Special meetings may be scheduled as needed.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Alternative Options:

1. Approve the cancellations

2. Provide direction to staff
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:

N/A
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:

None
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:

None
44 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item:

Meeting Date:

G.5
June 26, 2024
Agenda Section:

Consent
Staff Contact:

Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Agenda Item Title:

Resolutions Calling and Giving Notice of an Election to be Held on November 5, 2024 and Establishing Estimated Costs for Candidates’ Statements.
_______________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):
a. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale calling for a General Municipal Election to be held on November 5, 2024, for the election of two (2) at-large members of the City Council, and the election of the vacant City Treasurer position; Requesting that the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors consolidate the General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election to be held on November 5, 2024, and authorizing the Sonoma County Registrar of Voters to conduct and canvass the results of the General Municipal Election.” b. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale establishing estimated costs for printing, handling, translating, and mailing the Candidates Statements filed pursuant to Resolution No. 027-2012 for the consolidated General Election to be held in the City of Cloverdale on November 5, 2024.”
________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary:

A General Municipal Election will be held on November 5, 2024, for the purposes of electing two (2) members to the Cloverdale City Council. Their terms are due to expire at the end of this year; both are for four (4) year terms and the vacant City Treasurer Position. Candidates may take out and return nomination papers for this election during the period of July 15, 2024, through Friday, August 9, 2024, per the State of California Elections Code § 10220 and § 10224. If an incumbent does not return their nomination papers by this deadline, the nomination period will be extended for non-incumbents to August 12, 2024. The City Clerk, acting as the City’s Elections Official, issues and receives all related nomination papers (Elections Code § 10227).

Elections Code Section 10400 provides that the City Council may request, by resolution, the County Board of Supervisors to consolidate the General Municipal Election with the statewide General Election. In doing so, the Sonoma County Registrar of Voters would conduct the election and canvass the results as provided by law.

A resolution has been prepared establishing estimated costs for the printing, handling, translating, mailing the candidates’ statement and authorizing the City Clerk to bill any candidate, in accordance with Elections Code 13307(d), for the cost of printing his/her statement and to refund any excess amount collected from such candidate, depending on the final actual cost.

Costs are estimated by the Sonoma County Registrar of Voters for each jurisdiction participating in the 2024 consolidated General Election using a base-fee per registered voter. 45 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: June 26, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

________________________________________________________________________________________ Alternative Options:

1. Reject the Resolution to consolidate with the County’s Election

2. Choose to conduct a stand-alone election, and be responsible for all costs for the Voter’s Pamphlet, polling places, etc. If the City chooses a consolidated election, it will bear a pro-rated share of the costs of conducting the election.

3. Provide direction to staff
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:

N/A
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:

The November 5, 2024 Election is estimated to cost approximately $10,638 - $32,034 depending on the number of participatory registered voters (current voter registration for Cloverdale: 5,339). See Attachment 2, Exhibit A for the Registrar of Voters estimated price breakdown. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:

1. Resolution Calling the Election of November 5, 2024, for two (2) members of the City Council and one (1) vacant City Treasurer position.

2. Exhibit A - ROV’s Estimated Election Cost

3. Resolution establishing cost for printing and handling of candidates’ Statements of Qualifications for the November 5, 2024 Election.

4. Exhibit A - ROV’s Estimated SOQ Cost
46 CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. __-2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE CALLING FOR A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024, FOR THE ELECTION OF TWO (2) MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE ELECTION OF THE CITY TREASURER POSITION;

REQUESTING THAT THE SONOMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONSOLIDATE THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024 AND AUTHORIZING THE SONOMA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT AND

CANVASS THE RESULTS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California, a Municipal Election shall be held on November 5, 2024, for the election of two (2) at-large members of the City Council, and the election of the currently vacant City Treasurer position; and WHEREAS, Elections Code Section 10400 provides that the City Council may request that the County Board of Supervisors consolidate said General Municipal Election with the statewide general election; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Sections 10400, 10402 and 10403 of the Elections Code of the State of California, it is in the best public interests of the City to consolidate the City of Cloverdale General Municipal Election with the Statewide Election to be held on November 5, 2024; and WHEREAS, the terms of two (2) at-large members of the City Council will expire and the positions must be filled; and the City Treasurer position is currently vacant.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby adopted; and

2. The City Council of the City of Cloverdale hereby calls for a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2024 for the election of two (2) at-large City Council members, each for a term of office of four (4) years, and the election of the City Treasurer; and

3. Pursuant to California Elections Code Section 10400, 10402, and 10403, it is in the best public interest to consolidate the Cloverdale General Municipal Election with the Statewide Election to be held on November 5, 2024.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED:

1. That pursuant to the requirements of Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of Sonoma County is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, for the purpose of the election of two (2) at-large members of the City Council for the term of office of four (4) years and one (1) City Treasurer position. 47 City Council Resolution No. 044-2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

2. That the Sonoma County Registrar of Voters is authorized to conduct and canvass the results of the General Municipal Election. That the County Registrar of Voters of Sonoma County is authorized to specify the location for the tally of ballots and certify the results to the City Clerk of the City of Cloverdale. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. The three qualified candidates receiving the highest number of votes shall be elected to the available positions.

3. That in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.

4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the Registrar of Voters of the County of Sonoma.

5. That the City Manager is authorized and directed to compensate the County for the cost of conducting the General Municipal Election for the City.

6. The office of City Treasurer candidates shall pay to the City of Cloverdale the same costs for printing, handling, translating and mailing candidates’ statements for the Consolidated General Election to be held on November 5, 2024 as is charged to candidates for the office of Councilmember pursuant to Resolution No. ___-2024.

REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale on this 26th day of June, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES: ()
NOES: ()
ABSTAIN:()
ABSENT: ()
APPROVED: ATTEST:
_______________________ ____________________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
48 Jurisdiction
Office (Type)RegistrationPer Registered VoterEstimate RangeTotalEstimate RangeDate Given Given to
Santa Rosa
District 1 Council 9,836 $2.00- $5.50 $19,672
- $54,098
District 3 Council 18,230 $2.00
- $5.50 $36,460- $100,265
District 5 Council 11,169 $2.00- $5.50 $22,338
- $61,430
District 7 Council 14,002 $2.00- $5.50 $28,004- $77,011 Measure 102,243 $1.50
- $4.00 $153,365
- $408,972
Addtl. Measure 102,243 $0.50- $1.00 $51,122- $102,243 04/16/24 City Clerk Cloverdale
At Large Council 5,339 $2.00- $6.00 $10,678- $32,034
City Clerk * 5,339 $2.00 $6.00 $10,678
- $32,034
Measure 5,339 $1.50
- $2.50 $8,009
- $13,348
Addtl. Measure 5,339 $0.50- $1.00 $2,670- $5,339 04/16/24 City Clerk Cotati
At Large Council 4,962 $2.00- $6.00 $9,924- $29,772
Measure 4,962 $1.50
- $2.50 $7,443
- $12,405
Addtl. Measure 4,962 $0.50- $1.00 $2,481- $4,962 04/16/24 City Clerk Healdsburg
At Large Council 7,270 $2.00- $6.00 $14,540- $43,620
Measure 7,270 $1.50
- $2.50 $10,905- $18,175
Addtl. Measure 7,270 $0.50- $1.00 $3,635- $7,270 04/16/24 City Clerk Petaluma
District 4 Council 6,649 $1.50- $2.50 $9,974- $16,623
District 5 Council 7,519 $1.50- $2.50 $11,279- $18,798
District 6 Council 6,533 $1.50- $2.50 $9,800- $16,333
Measure 39,268 $1.50
- $2.50 $58,902- $98,170
Addtl. Measure 39,268 $0.50- $1.00 $19,634- $39,268 04/16/24 City Clerk Rohnert Park
District 1 Council 4,451 $2.00- $5.50 $8,902- $24,481
District 3 Council 5,581 $2.00- $5.50 $11,162- $30,696
49 District 4 Council 6,041 $2.00 - $5.50 $12,082 - $33,226 Measure 26,503 $1.50 - $2.50 $39,755 - $66,258
Addtl. Measure 26,503 $0.50 - $1.00 $13,252 - $26,503 04/16/24 City Clerk Sebastopol
At Large Council 5,583 $2.00 - $6.00 $11,166 - $33,498
Measure 5,583 $1.50 - $2.50 $8,375 - $13,958
Addtl. Measure 5,583 $0.50 - $1.00 $2,792 - $5,583 04/16/24 City Clerk Sonoma
At Large Council 7,557 $2.00 - $6.00 $15,114 - $45,342
Measure 7,557 $1.50 - $2.50 $11,336 - $18,893
Addtl. Measure 7,557 $0.50 - $1.00 $3,779 - $7,557 04/16/24 City Clerk Windsor
District 2 Council 4,713 $2.00 - $5.50 $9,426 - $25,922 District 3 Council 4,068 $2.00 - $5.50 $8,136 - $22,374 At Large Mayor * 16,778 $2.00 $6.00 $33,556 - $100,668
Measure 16,778 $1.50 - $2.50 $25,167 - $41,945
Addtl. Measure 16,778 $0.50 - $1.00 $8,389 - $16,778 04/16/24 Town Clerk Total 215,503
Subtotal
Unincorporated
50 CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE

ESTABLISHING ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PRINTING, HANDLING, TRANSLATING AND MAILING THE CANDIDATES’ STATEMENTS FILED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION 027-2012 FOR THE CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13307 of the California Elections Code, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at the General Municipal Election on November 5, 2024, may prepare a candidate statement on an appropriate form provided by the elections official. The statement may include the name, age, and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words about the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself; and WHEREAS, Section 13307(d) of the California Elections Code provides that the City may estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating and mailing Candidates’ Statements for nonpartisan elective office, and may require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the City his or her estimated pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter’s pamphlet; and
WHEREAS, the City of Cloverdale and the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors have authorized the County of Sonoma to conduct the Consolidated General Election in the City of Cloverdale on November 5, 2024, and the City of Cloverdale has agreed to pay its pro rata share of the costs of such election; and WHEREAS, the County of Sonoma has provided an estimate of costs for the printing, handling, translating and mailing of candidates’ statements on the November 5, 2024, ballot for English/Spanish; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 027-2012, of the City of Cloverdale requires candidates to pay such costs.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale, that candidates for the office of Councilmember in the City of Cloverdale shall pay to the City of Cloverdale the following estimated costs for printing, handling, translating and mailing candidates’ statements for the Consolidated General Election to be held on November 4, 2024:

English and Spanish Total Estimate (Council / Treasurer) $525 - $951 51 City Council Resolution No. 045-2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Cloverdale is authorized, pursuant to Elections Code Section 13307(c), to bill any candidate for the cost of printing his/her statement for additional actual expense of printing and to refund any excess amount collected from such candidate, depending on the final actual cost.

REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale on this 26th day of June, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES: ()
NOES: ()
ABSTAIN:()
ABSENT: ()
APPROVED: ATTEST:
_______________________ ____________________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A - SOQ Cost Estimate
52 Jurisdiction
Registered
Voters
Registered
Voters + 15%
2 Statements
(Eng/Span)
1 Statement
(Eng/Span)
City of Cloverdale City
Council 5,339 6,140 $525* $951*
City of Cloverdale Treasurer 5,339 6,140 $525* $951*
City of Cotati City Council 4,962 5,706 $521* $941*
City of Healdsburg City
Council 7,270 8,361 $549* $998*
City of Petaluma City
Council, District 4 6,649 7,646 $541* $983*
City of Petaluma City
Council, District 5 7,519 8,647 $552* $1,004*
City of Petaluma City
Council, District 6 6,533 7,513 $540* $980*
City of Rohnert Park City
Council, District 1 4,451 5,119 $514* $929*
City of Rohnert Park City
Council, District 3 5,581 6,418 $528* $957*
City of Rohnert Park City
Council, District 4 6,041 6,947 $534* $968*
City of Santa Rosa City
Council, District 1 9,836 11,311 $581* $1,062*
City of Santa Rosa City
Council, District 3 18,230 20,965 $685* $1,270*
City of Santa Rosa City
Council, District 5 11,169 12,844 $597* $1,095*
City of Santa Rosa City
Council, District 7 14,002 16,102 $632* $1,165*
City of Sebastopol City
Council 5,583 6,420 $528* $957*
City of Sonoma City Council 7,557 8,691 $553* $1,005*
SOQs for Districts -- Municipal Offices
All statements are now English/Spanish
53 Town of Windsor Town
Council, Mayor 16,778 19,295 $667* $1,234*
Town of Windsor Town
Council, District 2 4,713 5,420 $518* $935*
Town of Windsor Town
Council, District 3 4,068 4,678 $510* $919*
54 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item:

Meeting Date:

G.6
June 26, 2024
Agenda Section:

Consent
Staff Contact:

Susie Holmes, Finance Director
Agenda Item Title:

Resolution of the City Council Establishing the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2024-25, Pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California.
_______________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):

Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Establishing the Appropriation Limit for Fiscal Year 2024-25.”
________________________________________________________________________________________ Background:

According to the California state appropriations limit (SAL) also known as the Gann Spending-Limitation Initiative (Article XIII B of the State Constitution) adopted as Proposition 4 in June of 1979 (and subsequently modified by Proposition 111 in June of 1990), the City is required to annually adopt a resolution setting an appropriations limit for each fiscal year. For Fiscal Year 2024-25, staff projects that the City’s appropriations (for all general governmental funds) subject to limitations to be $5,332,870, which is $7,383,822 less than the calculated limit of $12,716,692.

The Gann Spending-Limitation Initiative provides for the limitation of state and local government appropriations. As discussed in the following summary of the major provisions of the Gann Initiative and Proposition 111 modifications, the Gann Initiative is actually a limitation on tax revenues rather than a direct limitation on appropriations:

1. Appropriations subject to limitation may not exceed appropriations made in 1978-79 except as adjusted for increases in the cost of living, population and service responsibility transfers.

2. Appropriations financed through service fees (to the degree that they do not exceed the cost of performing the service), grant programs, fines and forfeitures, and other specified “non-tax” sources are not subject to the appropriations limit. Additionally, appropriations for long-term indebtedness incurred prior to 1978-79, debt service on qualified capital outlays beginning in 1990-91, qualified capital outlays in excess of major capital-related expenditures, all appropriations funded through tax revenues are subject to limitation.

3. For the purpose of identifying “proceeds from taxes” under the Gann Initiative, state subventions that are unrestricted as to their use (such as motor vehicle in-lieu revenues) are considered to be tax sources. On the other hand, the use of subventions like gas tax and transportation development act funds is restricted by the State, and as such, is classified as non-tax sources.

4. Under the original Gann Initiative, all proceeds from taxes received in excess of the appropriations limit were required to be returned through refunds or revisions in tax rates and fee schedules within the next two fiscal years; or voter approval to increase the appropriations limit was required. Proposition 111 provides a one-year carryover feature to determine excess revenues under which refunds can be avoided if in the subsequent year the City is below the limit by the amount of the prior year excess. Any voter approved increased to the appropriations limit cannot exceed four years.

5. Originally, the Gann Initiative was self-executing, requiring no formal review; however, Proposition 111 requires that the annual calculation be reviewed as part of the annual financial audit. 55 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: June 14, 2023

Page 2 of 3 ends

6. Major concepts in implementing the Gann Initiative as modified by Proposition 111 include: appropriations funded through tax sources are subject to the limit, not actual expenditures; and any excess of actual tax revenues over the appropriations limit, not actual expenditures or appropriations, are subject to refund.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary:

The annual adjustment factors for changes in population and cost of living for the appropriations limit calculation must be selected by a recorded vote of the Council, and include the following:

1. Population. Based on data provided annually by the State Department of Finance, cities may annually choose either the growth in their city’s or the county’s population.

For this year’s calculation, the City’s population growth factor (which exceeds the County’s factor) is the recommended adjustment factor as discussed below.

2. Cost of living. Local governments may annually choose either the percentage change in California per capita personal income or the percentage change in their jurisdiction’s assessed valuation that is attributable to the non-residential new construction.

Data for the percentage change in California per capita personal income change is provided annually by the State Department of Finance. Data for the preceding year in calculating the increase in the nonresidential assessed valuation is not currently available from the County; therefore, the recommended cost of living factor is California per capita income. However, when non-residential construction data becomes available from the County, the limit can be recalculated and retroactively adopted if different results are anticipated.

A summary of the City’s appropriations limit history is provided in Attachment 2. As reflected in that summary, the City’s limit for 2024-25 $12,716,692 calculated as follows:

Appropriations Limit Calculations
2019-2020 Appropriations Limit $ 10,298,871
Adjustment Factors
A. Cost of Living Options

1. Percentage change in assessed value in the preceding year due to
new non-residential construction.
2023-24 $ 12,305,656
Adjustment Factors
A. Cost of Living Options

1. Percentage change in assessed value in the preceding year due to Not currently new non-residential construction. available

2. Percentage change in California per capita income 3.62% B. Population Options

1. Percentage change in City population -1.11%

2. Percentage change in County population -0.27000%
Percentage Factor (Cost of Living factor x Population factor) 1.03340226 2024-25 $ 12,716,694
The options in bold print are the recommended adjustment factors in determining the appropriations limit for 2024-25 Appropriations Limit Calculations
56 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: June 14, 2023

Page 3 of 3 ends

2. Percentage change in California per capita income
B. Population Options

1. Percentage change in City population

2. Percentage change in County population
Percentage Factor (Cost of Living factor x Population factor) 2020-2021 Appropriations Limit $ 10,607,170
The options in bold print are the recommended adjustment factors in determining the appropriations limit for 2020-21 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Alternative Options:

1. Reject Resolution;

2. Provide Direction to Staff
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:

N/A
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:

There is no financial impact in the Fiscal Year 2024-25 as the Appropriation Limit is higher than Appropriations subject to the limit.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:

1. Resolution Adopting the Appropriation Limit for fiscal year 2024-25.

2. Appropriation Limit Calculation.

3. May 2024 Price and Population information for CA and Sonoma County from the Department of Finance
57 FINANCIAL AND STATISTICAL TABLES

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT HISTORY
The Gann Spending Limit Initiative , a State constitutional amendment adopted by the voters on June 6, 1979, restricts appropriations from tax revenues by State and local governments.

Under its provisions, no local agency can appropriate proceeds of taxes in excess of its "appropriations limit." Excess funds may be carried over into the next year. However, any excess funds remaining after the second year must be returned to taxpayers by reducing tax rates or fees; or a majority of the voters may approve an override to increase the limit.

The following summarizes changes in the City's appropriations limit and appropriations subject to the limit since the effective date of the initiative. While there are exceptions, in general, the City's appropriations limit increases annually by compound changes in cost-of-living and population. This summary also reflects changes made by Proposition 111 (adopted in June 1990) in determining the appropriations limit as well as the appropriations subject to it.

Fiscal Year Limit Base
Cost of Living
Factor Population Factor Appropriations Limit
Appropriations Subject
to Limit Variance
1978-79 808,406 808,406 0
1979-80 808,406 10.16% 3.06% 917,791 890,257 27,534
1980-81 917,791 10.53% 2.02% 1,034,925 972,830 62,096
1981-82 1,034,925 9.12% 4.56% 1,180,807 1,114,500 66,307 1982-83 1,180,807 6.79% 0.82% 1,271,324 1,161,794 109,530 1983-84 1,271,324 2.35% 0.85% 1,312,260 1,186,081 126,179 1984-85 1,312,260 4.74% -0.19% 1,371,850 1,226,223 145,628 1985-86 1,371,850 3.74% 2.21% 1,454,609 1,196,957 257,652 1986-87 1,454,609 2.30% 0.83% 1,500,416 1,366,059 134,357 Post-Proposition 111
1987-88 1,500,416 3.47% 2.94% 1,598,123 1,407,073 191,050 1988-89 1,598,123 4.66% 3.33% 1,728,293 1,351,651 376,642 1989-90 1,728,293 5.19% 3.20% 1,876,168 1,848,351 27,817 1990-91 1,876,168 4.21% 6.00% 2,072,463 1,507,060 565,403 1991-92 2,072,463 4.14% 4.43% 2,253,875 1,571,363 682,512 1992-93 2,253,875 -0.64% 4.20% 2,333,507 1,603,546 729,961 1993-94 2,333,507 2.72% 2.43% 2,455,225 1,594,550 860,675 1994-95 2,455,225 0.71% 2.07% 2,523,841 1,585,902 937,939 1995-96 2,523,841 4.72% 2.22% 2,701,640 1,634,248 1,067,392 1996-97 2,701,640 4.67% 1.58% 2,872,486 1,732,572 1,139,914 1997-98 2,872,486 4.67% 1.20% 3,042,710 1,683,109 1,359,601 1998-99 3,042,710 4.15% 2.11% 3,235,848 1,624,423 1,611,425 1999-00 3,235,848 4.53% 7.36% 3,631,379 1,621,234 2,010,145 2000-01 3,631,379 4.91% 5.46% 4,017,689 1,744,753 2,272,936 2001-02 4,017,689 7.82% 5.38% 4,564,927 1,802,365 2,762,562 2002-03 4,564,927 -1.27% 4.30% 4,700,751 1,916,480 2,784,271 2003-04 4,700,751 2.31% 2.41% 4,925,243 1,958,752 2,966,491 2004-05 4,925,243 3.28% 6.39% 5,411,837 2,454,000 2,957,837 2005-06 5,411,837 5.26% 3.35% 5,887,333 2,554,800 3,332,533 2006-07 5,887,333 3.96% 2.75% 6,288,784 3,004,912 3,283,872 ** 2007-08 6,288,784 4.42% 0.97% 6,630,446 3,455,024 3,175,422 2008-09 6,630,446 4.29% 1.16% 6,995,105 3,420,747 3,574,358 2009-10 6,995,105 0.62% 0.91% 7,102,524 2,732,245 4,370,279 2010-11 7,102,524 -2.54% 1.24% 7,007,954 2,567,252 4,440,702 2011-12 7,007,954 2.51% 0.87% 7,246,354 2,375,684 4,870,670 2012-13 7,246,354 3.77% 0.41% 7,550,371 2,330,484 5,219,887 2013-14 7,550,371 5.12% 0.57% 7,982,191 2,707,383 5,274,808 * 2014-15 7,982,191 -0.23% 0.39% 7,994,891 2,801,408 5,193,483 * 2015-16 7,994,891 3.82% 0.84% 8,370,018 3,457,847 4,912,171 * 2016-17 8,370,018 5.37% 0.53% 8,866,231 3,556,225 5,310,006 2017-18 8,866,231 3.69% 1.11% 9,295,442 3,894,222 5,401,220 2018-19 9,295,442 3.67% 1.62% 9,792,697 4,105,484 5,687,213 2019-20 9,792,697 3.85% 1.27% 10,298,871 4,413,857 5,885,014 2020-21 10,298,871 3.73% -0.71% 10,607,170 4,310,325 6,296,845 2021-22 10,607,170 5.73% -0.43% 11,166,737 5,209,713 5,957,024 2022-23 11,166,737 7.55% -0.54% 11,845,292 5,193,578 6,651,714 2023-24 11,845,292 4.44% -0.43% 12,305,656 5,209,713 7,095,943 2024-25 12,305,656 3.62% -0.27% 12,716,694 5,332,870 7,383,824 * Population Factor is the largest of City or County
** Appropriation Subject to Limit Estimated
$750,000
$2,750,000
$4,750,000
$6,750,000
$8,750,000
$10,750,000
$12,750,000
$14,750,000
1978-791981-821984-851987-881990-911993-941996-971999-002002-032005-062008-092011-122014-152017-182020-212023-24 Appropriations 1979-2024
Appropriations Limit Appropriations Subject to Limit
X:\Finance\Appropriation Gann Limit\FY 24-25\Attach2 - GANN Limit 2025 Appropriations Limit History.xlsx 58 59
60 61

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ___ -2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
WHEREAS, the voters approved the Gann Spending Limitation Initiative on November 6, 1979, and Proposition 111 on June 5, 1990, which establish and define annual appropriations on state and local government agencies; and
WHEREAS, regulations require that the governing body of each local agency establish its appropriations limit and annual adjustment factors by resolution; and the State Legislature adopted Chapters 1205/80 and 60/90 which implemented Article XIII-B and amendments; and WHEREAS, the City of Cloverdale has complied with the provisions of Article XIII B to determine the City’s appropriations limit and estimated appropriations subject to limitation for 2024-25; and WHEREAS, the appropriations limit is calculated pursuant to Proposition 111, the City Council is aware that adoption of this limit is an interim measure and the limit may change at a future date once all the data required to compute is available; and
WHEREAS, the specific information that is not available is the percentage change in non-residential construction and this information is to be supplied by the County of Sonoma Tax Assessor’s Office at some future date.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Cloverdale hereby the specific information that is not available is the percentage change in non-residential construction and this information is to be supplied by the County of Sonoma Tax Assessor’s Office at some future date. 62 The foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on the 26th day of June 2024 by the following roll call vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
______________________ ______________________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
63 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item:

Meeting Date:

G.7
June 26, 2024
Agenda Section:

Consent
Staff Contact:

Chris Parker, Chief of Police
Shannon Peterson, Finance & HR Analyst
Agenda Item Title:

Approve a Resolution revising the classification and pay range for Police Records Technician ________________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):

Linda Webb, Police Records Technician, announced her retirement on July 15, 2024. Her last day in the office will be June 20, 2024. Ms. Webb was previously the Support Services Supervisor, which included her current role and supervision of Dispatch. In 2022, when the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice implemented significant changes to police and criminal data reporting systems and process, the roles were separated, and Ms. Webb no longer supervised the Dispatch unit. At that time, the pay range for Ms.

Webb was not adjusted to reflect the change and remains higher than the labor market for the duties of the position. Every vacancy is an opportunity to review service delivery and business needs. This item updates Police Records Technician’s role and recommends a market and internal parity-based pay range for the duties.

Summary:

Staff requested Muchmore Than Consulting, LLC (Consultant) conduct a study of the position to determine if the duties and responsibilities matched the current classification of Police Records Technician. The Consultant found that except for a few minor additional duties, the job classification did accurately and completely describe the duties of the position. The additional duties were not considered significant enough to change the scope or breadth of the position’s responsibilities and duties and include administering preemployment exams for new employees, cell and data streaming services and applications for U-Visas (temporary visas for non-immigrants who are persons if interest or are materially assisting an active case).

Staff also requested the duties related to LiveScan fingerprinting processes be considered in addition to the position’s duties.

The Consultant found the position to be not exempt from the overtime rules of the Federal Labor Standards Board and most aligned with classifications in the Cloverdale Dispatcher’s Association for representation.

Therefore, the pay range was reviewed based on market competitiveness and internal parity. Because the pay range of the position had never been reduced after the responsibility to supervise the Dispatch Unit was removed, the pay range was significantly (25%) above the market for the proposed new duties. 64 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: June 26, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

Based on the above, staff recommends the revised pay range of low monthly step $4,747 and high monthly step $5,771 for the newly revised job classification. This represents a 25% savings from the current pay range for the position.
_______________________________________________________________________________________ Options:

1. Adopt the proposed resolution that revises the classification of Police Records Technician and the related pay range

2. Reject the proposed resolution

3. Request modifications in the classification and pay range and continue the matter to a future Regular Council Meeting
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:

The Finance Administration & Police Subcommittee recommended the City Council Approve the revised job classification and salary.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:

The impact of this change will result in a 25% salary reduction equal to approximately $23,000/annually. _______________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A – Revised Classification Specification

3. Revised Classification Specification (Redline Version) 65 CITYOF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION N0. ___-2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING THE REVISED

CLASSIFICATION OF POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN AND RELATED PAY RANGE WHEREAS, Cloverdale Municipal Code (CMC) 2.48.030(c) directs the preparation, maintenance, and revision of a position classification plan; and
WHEREAS, CMC 2.48.030(d) directs the preparation, administration, and revision of a plan of compensation correlated with the classification plan; and
WHEREAS, from time to time it is necessary to update these plans to update existing classifications or create new ones to accurately reflect the job duties required by the City; and WHEREAS, in order to attract and maintain a strong, professional workforce it is important to compensate employees in a competitive way and in a way that appropriately recognizes their responsibilities; and WHEREAS, The City of Cloverdale has identified a need to revise the position of Police Records Technician; and
WHEREAS, the new classification is not exempt from the overtime rules of the FLSA and the labor representatives and the staff concur that the revised classification is most aligned with the Cloverdale Dispatchers Association employee unit, and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council City of Cloverdale does hereby amend the City’s Personnel System to update the classification of Police Records Technician with a position description attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A and establishes the salary range of $4,747 - $5,771 per month which may be amended from time to time based on Council action for Cloverdael Dispatchers Association; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that compensation for this position may be expressed either in terms of monthly salary or corresponding hourly rates.

REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale on this 26th day of June 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED: ATTEST:

Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A - Revised Classification Specification 66
~ 1 ~

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN
Job Description

DEFINITION
Under general supervision, supervises and participates in the preparation, processing, and management of police records; acts as the custodian of Police Records; performs tasks related to the security of the automated criminal information system; provides confidential secretarial support to the Chief of Police; performs related duties as required.

CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
The Police Records Technician reports to Chief of Police and/or the Police Lieutenant and is a non-sworn position/class responsible for the supervision of records, and other services. In addition, the incumbent is responsible for providing confidential secretarial support to the Chief of Police.

ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS
The following duties are typical for this classification. Incumbents may not perform all of the listed duties and/or may be required to perform additional or different duties from those set forth below to address business needs and changing business practices.

Prepares, process, and files police records for prosecution/discovery; maintains security of police records, ensuring that information is released in accordance with related laws and department policies: processes a wide variety of police records, reports, and materials, including arrest reports, warrants, citations, crime and traffic reports, fingerprint cards, and mug shots; proofreads materials and ensures that all pertinent information is included.

Answers assigned direct telephone line, providing information and/or routing persons to appropriate parties; assists department personnel and the public in person and by phone; releases requested reports and related information to the public or to outside agencies in accordance with established regulations; provides general information regarding department policies, procedures, and regulations.

Operates computer terminals and teletype to enter, modify, and retrieve data such as stolen and recovered property, driver's license and vehicle registration information, warrants, and detective supplements; conducts record checks and researches files for requested information; enters crime and non-criminal reports into the database including detailed information on names, property and vehicles; ensures the accuracy of uniform crime reporting codes on crime reports and for the preparation of monthly reports.

Accepts subpoenas; receives fees; prepares receipts, standard forms, and records in accordance with established procedures. Responsible for internal process of subpoena service to the employees both criminal and civil, completes affidavits and certifications, documenting the service and notifying the court.

Coordinates, schedules, tracks, and administers various local safety and civilian pre-employment examinations, accepts and processes U-Visa applications, and administers access to the department’s cell and data streaming services.

Compiles statistical data and prepares routine reports; conducts records audits for assigned staff and performs other routine and administrative tasks as assigned.

Develops, administers, and conducts training programs in police record keeping, office procedures, and forms processing for Police Department personnel.
67 ~ 2 ~
Responds to inquiries and resolves complaints; provides information to the public in accordance with established laws, codes, regulations, and policies; responds to departmental subpoenas by reviewing/gathering necessary documents and ensuring that required forms are completed and mailed serves as "custodian of records" and testifies in court as needed.

Monitors individuals required by law to register as sex offenders, narcotic offenders and arsonists for compliance. Maintains confidential files; adds photographs and data to Department of Justice Database CSAR, ensures proper documentation is updated and completed annually as required by law.

ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS (Continued)
As the Agency’s SPOC (Security Point of Contact) for the State/Federal Departments of Justice Automated Criminal Information Systems; performs periodic security checks, assigns user privileges, and acts as end user liaison to the service provider.

Advises, and otherwise provides assistance to other department personnel regarding records activities or the operation of automated records systems; provides liaison to other law enforcement agencies regarding records related inquiries.

Provides confidential secretarial support to the Police Chief and staff; prepares and processes department payroll and maintains records of overtime, vacation, and sick leave; orders and maintains office supplies; operates a variety of office equipment;
May process manual fingerprints and administers the Department’s LiveScan program.

QUALIFICATIONS GUIDELINES
Education and/or Experience
Any combination of education and/or experience that has provided the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary for satisfactory performance. Example combinations include equivalent to graduation from high school supplemented with college course work in records management; and two years of increasingly responsible experience in police records maintenance or four years of law enforcement related secretarial experience.

Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities
Considerable knowledge of the principles and practices of law enforcement records management; computerized systems used in municipal law enforcement agencies; laws, codes, regulations, and policies relating to the control of police records; basic principles and operating characteristics of law enforcement communications systems; principles, regulations and laws relating to records management; procedures and techniques of budget preparation and administration; general office procedures; methods and techniques of supervision; computer operations including word processing and spreadsheet programs.

Ability to communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing; research and prepare reports; effectively manage police records and other police related services; meet the public in situations requiring diplomacy and tact; select, train, supervise, and evaluate employees; deal constructively with conflict and develop effective resolutions; make decisions regarding operational and personnel functions; operate programs within allocated amounts; respond to emergency and problem situations in an effective manner; understand, explain and apply policies and procedures; analyze unusual situations and resolve them through the application of management principles and practices; develop and implement record management inventory control and communications systems; deal constructively with conflict and develop effective resolutions; use and edit for correct grammar, punctuation and spelling. 68 ~ 3 ~
Special Requirements
May be required to serve in dispatch at the Police Chief or designee's discretion. This requires 24 hours of P.O.S.T. Continued Professional Training (CPT) every 2 years as required by dispatchers.

PHYSICAL PROFILE:

CATEGORY I - LIGHT PHYSICAL EFFORT

DEFINITION
Positions in this category require normal physical abilities associated with the ability to read, write and communicate in a work environment requiring no extraordinary physical strength or special physical qualifications.

CHARACTERISTICS
Work assignments for this category are normally located in a work environment which has no unusual physical requirements or environmental conditions, unless separately identified. Positions in this category require only light physical effort while performing such functions as typing, writing, filing computing, operating light office equipment, interviewing, counseling, researching, planning, analyzing, and supervising. Positions allocated to this category are distinguished by a lack of duties involving strenuous activities. These positions seldom lift more than 20 pounds.

OTHER FACTORS
Reaching: Reaching above the shoulders to place and/or retrieve objects.

Sitting: Ability to sit with little movement for prolonged periods of time (Usually a minimum of two or more hours per day).

Color Vision: Ability to identify and distinguish colors Revised: June XX, 2024
69 ~ 1 ~

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN
(Formerly Support Services Supervisor)
Job Description

Compiles statistical data and prepares routine reports; conducts records audits for assigned staff and performs other routine and administrative tasks as assigned.

Develops, administers, and conducts training programs in police record keeping, office procedures, and forms processing for Police Department personnel.
70 ~ 2 ~
Responds to inquiries and resolves complaints; provides information to the public in accordance with established laws, codes, regulations, and policies; responds to departmental subpoenas by reviewing/gathering necessary documents and ensuring that required forms are completed and mailed serves as "custodian of records" and testifies in court as needed.

Registers and processes individuals required by law to register as sex offenders, narcotics offenders and arsonists; m Monitors individuals required by law to register as sex offenders, narcotic offenders and arsonists for compliance. Maintains confidential files; adds photographs and data to Department of Justice Database CSAR, ensures proper documentation is updated and completed annually as required by law.conducts follow ups annually of sex offenders.

Ability to communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing; research and prepare reports; effectively manage police records and other police related services; meet the public in situations requiring diplomacy and tact; select, train, supervise, and evaluate employees; deal constructively with conflict and develop effective resolutions; make decisions regarding operational and personnel functions; operate programs within allocated amounts; respond to emergency and problem situations in an effective manner; understand, explain and apply policies and procedures; analyze unusual situations and resolve them through the application of management principles and practices; develop and implement record management inventory control and communications systems; deal constructively with conflict and develop effective resolutions; use and edit for correct grammar, punctuation and spelling. 71 ~ 3 ~
Special Requirements
Provide dispatching assistance as needed during breaks May be required to serve in dispatch at the Police Chief or designee's discretion. This requires 24 hours of P.O.S.T. Continued Professional Training (CPT) every 2 years as required by dispatchers.

PHYSICAL PROFILE:

CATEGORY I - LIGHT PHYSICAL EFFORT

OTHER FACTORS
Reaching: Reaching above the shoulders to place and/or retrieve objects.

Sitting: Ability to sit with little movement for prolonged periods of time (Usually a minimum of two or more hours per day).

Color Vision: Ability to identify and distinguish colors Revised: June XX, 2024
72 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item:

Meeting Date:

H.1
June 26, 2024
Agenda Section:

Public Hearing
Staff Contact:

Susie Holmes, Finance Director
Agenda Item Title:

Consider a Resolution Establishing and Updating the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services and Repealing Previously Adopted and Conflicting Fees and Charges for Such Services ________________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):

Adopt the Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Establishing and Updating the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services and repealing the previously adopted and conflicting fees and charges for such services.”
________________________________________________________________________________________ Background:

The City of Cloverdale has maintained a policy of recovering the cost of providing miscellaneous City services and regulatory activities so that the costs are borne by the direct beneficiaries of the services and regulatory activities, rather than by the City's General Fund. The City Council last updated the City's Fee Schedule by adoption of Resolution No. 055-2023 on June 12, 2023. The Master Fee Schedule is updated annually to ensure that fees are adjusted to reflect the current cost of delivery of services. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary:

City staff completed a comprehensive calculation of the applicable minimum fee, the minimum staff time required for each task staff was multiplied by the current billing rate of the position processing the request.

With the implementation of OpenGov for budgeting and workforce development, staff is able to closely track the cost of providing services in the Master Fee Schedule.

The Master Fee Schedule and resolutions updating the fees are attached. The proposed fees represent the minimum fee to be charged for each service. Under the proposed fee schedule, if an application results in more than the estimated minimum processing time, City service costs over and above the minimum amounts specified in the rate schedule are recoverable on a time and materials basis. All changes to the schedule are identified with by the percentage change.

Notice of the Council's consideration of the new fees and fee increases has been provided in compliance with applicable law. As also required by the Mitigation Fee Act, the City's information and cost data supporting the fee increases have been made available to the public at the City Clerk's office ten days in advance of this meeting.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Options:

1. Reject Resolution and continue to charge established fees;

2. Revise the Resolution(s) as presented and adopt the revised resolution(s); or

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.
73 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: June 26, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:

None.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:

Adoption of the Master Fee Schedule will enable the City to recover the cost of providing city services to residents, applicants, businesses and developers.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Master Fee Schedule
74 CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE

ESTABLISHING AND UPDATING THE SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR

CITY SERVICES AND REPEALING PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED AND CONFLICTING

FEES AND CHARGES FOR SUCH SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cloverdale (“City”) has maintained a policy of recovering up to the full cost of providing miscellaneous voluntary City services and regulatory activities from those persons utilizing them, so that such costs are borne by the direct beneficiaries of such services and regulatory activities rather than by the City General Fund, pursuant to applicable law; and WHEREAS, the City Council last updated the City’s schedule of such services and regulatory activities by Resolution No. 055-2023 on June 12, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City Council last updated the City’s schedule of its engineering and planning service fees by Resolution No. 055-2023 on June 12, 2023; and
WHEREAS, City staff have recently completed a review of City service fees and charges, including an analysis of the personnel, maintenance and operation costs, professional services, capital costs, and time, materials and equipment required to perform such services; and WHEREAS, based on the analysis of such fees and charges, staff have estimated cost of the time, materials and equipment in light of the present costs of providing the services that such fees and charges are intended to recover and staff’s analysis of such present service costs has resulted in re-calculated service fees and charges, as set forth in the Fee Schedule attached hereto and made part of this Resolution as Exhibit A (“Fee Schedule”);
WHEREAS, the current Staff Billing Rates for various City services and activities are attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution as a portion of Exhibit A (“Staff Billing Rates”); and WHEREAS, in adopting the fees and charges for City services as set forth in this Resolution, the City Council is exercising its powers under Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, Section 66014 of the California Government Code, and other applicable law; and WHEREAS, none of the fees and charges set forth in the Fee Schedule adopted by this Resolution is a “tax” as defined in Section 1, paragraph (e) of Article XIIIC of the California Constitution because such fees and charges are imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payer that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable cost to the local government of providing the service or product; such fees and charges are imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payer that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable cost to the local government of providing the service or product; and/or such fees and charges are imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders 75

Page 2 of 7 ends

and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof; and/or such fees and charges are imposed as a condition of property development; and
WHEREAS, the fees and charges set forth in the schedule of fees and charges adopted by this Resolution are not subject to the requirements of Article XIIID of the California Constitution concerning property related assessments and fees pursuant to Apartment Association of Los Angeles County v. City of Los Angeles (2001) 24 Cal.4th 830, in that such fees are not applicable to incidents of property ownership, but rather to actual use of City services; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 50076, fees and charges that do not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service or regulatory activity for which the fees are charged and which are not levied for general revenue purposes are not special taxes as defined in Article 3.5 of the Government Code; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 66014, local agency fees for: zoning variances, use permits, building inspections, building permits, filing and processing applications and petitions filed with the local agency formation commission or conducting proceedings filed under the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code § 56000, et seq.), processing maps under the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code § 66410, et seq.), or planning services shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code section 65104, fees to support the work of planning agencies shall not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 65456, legislative bodies may, after adopting a specific plan, impose a specific plan fee upon persons seeking governmental approvals which are required to be consistent with the specific plan, and such fees shall, in the aggregate, defray but not exceed the cost of preparation, adoption and administration of the specific plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 65909.5, reasonable city fees for the processing of use permits, zone variances, or zone changes shall not exceed the amount reasonably required to administer the processing of such permits, zone variances or changes; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 66451.2, reasonable local agency fees for the processing of tentative, final and parcel maps shall not exceed the amount reasonably required by the agency; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 17951, city governing bodies may prescribe fees for permits, certificates or other documents required or authorized concerning implementation and enforcement of the California Building Standards Code, and such fees shall not exceed the amount reasonably required to administer or process those permits, certificates or other forms or documents, and shall not be levied for general revenue purposes; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 19132.3, city governing bodies may adopt fees for filing building permit applications, and such fees shall not exceed the amount reasonably required for the local enforcement agency to issue such permits, and shall not be levied for general revenue purposes; and
76

Page 3 of 7 ends

WHEREAS, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 19852, city governing bodies may prescribe such fees as will pay the expenses incurred by the building department in maintaining the official copy of the plans of buildings for which building permits have been issued, but such fees shall not exceed the amount reasonably required in maintaining the official copy of the plans for which building permits have been issued; and
WHEREAS, fees adopted pursuant to Government Code Sections 66014, 65104, 65456, 65909.5, and 66451.2, and Health and Safety Code Sections 17951, 19132.3, and 19852, are to be imposed pursuant to Section 66016 of the Government Code, which imposes certain procedural requirements prior to levying a new fee or service charge, or prior to approving an increase in an existing fee or service charge; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Government Code Section 66016, the fees contained in the Fee Schedule and the basis for calculating such fees constitute cost data supporting the fee increases and new fees and charges, and such cost data was available for public review and comment for ten days prior to the public hearing at which this Resolution was adopted; and WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code Section 66016, at least 14 days prior to the public hearing at which the City Council first considered adoption of the fees established by this Resolution, notice of the time and place of the hearing was mailed to eligible interested parties who filed written requests with the City for mailed notice of meetings on new or increased fees or service charges; and
WHEREAS, 10 days advance notice of the public hearing at which this Resolution was adopted was given by publication in accordance with Section 6062a of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to adopt a schedule of fees and charges, which updates certain existing fees and charges, and/or establishes certain new fees and charges based on the City's budgeted and projected costs of providing such services; and WHEREAS, the schedule of fees and the total amounts thereof, described in Exhibit "A," which is attached to and made a part of this Resolution, are hereby determined to be reasonable in that the amounts thereof do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of providing the services for which the charges and fees are made;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale as follows:

Section 1. Findings. The following findings are true and correct and adopted as the findings of the City Council:

A. The purpose of the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution is to recover up to the full, lawfully recoverable costs incurred by the City in providing various City services, and such fees and charges are not levied for general revenue purposes.

B. After consideration of the data and information regarding the costs of providing services relating to all fees and charges subject to this Resolution, including the Fee Schedule, Staff Billing Rates, all testimony received orally or in writing at or before the noticed public hearing, the agenda report and the background documents to the agenda report and all correspondence received (together, “Record”), the City Council of the City of Cloverdale approves and adopts the methods and basis of calculations of 77

Page 4 of 7 ends

the fees and charges identified in Exhibit A as establishing the reasonable estimated cost of providing such services or activities.

C. Adoption of the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution is intended to recover costs necessary to maintain such services within the City within existing service areas and is not a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines") section 15378(b)(4) (the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any specific commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment); and/or CEQA Guidelines section 15273 (statutory exemption for rates, tolls, fares and charges within an existing service area); and/or CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) (“common sense” general exemption where there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment).

D. The Record establishes that the costs listed in the Fee Schedule and the staff rates applicable to those fees and charges which are to be increased and/or established as costs incurred by the City in providing City services are reasonable estimates of the cost of providing such services, and that the revisions recommended to existing fees for such services are necessary to recover the reasonable, estimated cost of providing such services.

Section 2. Fee Schedule Adoption. The fee amounts that result from the application of the methods and basis of calculation of the Fees identified in Exhibit A to current staff billing rates specified in Exhibit B for services and activities subject to such fees are hereby imposed on the services or activities subject to such Fees at the time such services or activities are sought and/or performed by the City or its designated contractors.

Section 3. Separate Fee for Each Process. All fees set by this Resolution are for each identified process or service; additional fees shall be required for each additional process or service that is requested or required. Where fees are indicated on a per unit of measurement basis, the fee is for each identified unit or portion thereof within the indicated ranges of such units.

Section 4. Adoption of Fees.

A. Definitions.
(1) “Applicant” shall mean any person required by the Cloverdale Municipal Code or other applicable law to apply to the City seeking a permit or other approval or services or to file documents, including, but not limited to, maps, concerning proposed Development Projects within the City. “Applicant” shall also mean any person who: (i) is permitted by the Cloverdale Municipal Code or other applicable law to apply to the City seeking a permit or other approval or services or to file documents, including, but not limited to, maps, concerning proposed Development Projects within the City and who (ii) actually applies to the City seeking such permit or other approval or services or files such documents.
(2) “Development Projects” shall mean the construction, alteration or addition, other than by the City, of any building or structure within the City, and any use of land, other than by the City, including, but not limited to, subdivision of land, within the City that is subject pursuant to the Cloverdale Municipal Code or other applicable law to first seeking and obtaining from the City a permit or other approval or services or to first filing documents, including, but not limited to, maps with the City. 78

Page 5 of 7 ends

(3) “Fees” shall mean the charge or charges imposed on members of the public or Applicants to recover the costs incurred by the City in providing City services to any member of the public and development related services to Applicants.

B. Services Fees Imposed.

Fees shall be imposed on and paid by members of the public and Applicants at the times, and in the amounts, and otherwise apply and be administered as prescribed in this Resolution. The City shall accept for processing no applications or other filings that are subject to payment of Fees without the fee required pursuant to this Resolution.

C. Time for Payment of Fees.

The estimated Fees applicable to members of the public and Applicants subject to payment of Fees shall be deposited and/or be paid, upon a member of the public or an Applicant seeking or being required to seek a permit or other approval or services or filing documents, including, but not limited to, maps, concerning or related to City services and/or proposed Development Projects within the City, and upon notice from the City that a deposit for future processing is required.

D. Fee Amounts.

The fee amounts shall be as specified in the Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution.

The total Fees applicable to any City services or Development Projects that require payment of multiple Fees shall be the sum of all such Fees.

E. Use of Fee Revenue.

The revenues raised by payment of the Fees shall be used to fund the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the Fees are charged, and the fee revenues shall not be used for general revenue purposes. Fees shall be applied against the cost of providing the services for which the fees are charged. The City shall maintain a record of direct and indirect costs of providing services for City services and Development Projects subject to the deposit.

F. Deposit Maintenance.

Applicants subject to Fees in the form of a deposit must maintain deposit balances in accordance with this provision. When City service costs equal 75 percent of the deposit balance, the City shall notify the Applicant that the deposit must be increased to its original amount as prescribed in this Resolution.

After an Applicant for a Development Project subject to deposit in accordance with the Resolution has been notified City service costs equal 75 percent of the deposit balance, when the service costs equal 90 percent of the deposit balance, services for such Development Project will cease until the deposit is increased to its original amount prescribed in this Resolution, and/or City staff may recommend denial of the Development Project to the decision making body.

G. Refund of Unused Deposit Balances.

Fees other than deposit amounts are not subject to refund. If a fund balance remains in the deposit for a Development Project, and the City services for such Development Project are completed and 79

Page 6 of 7 ends

all City service costs paid from such deposit, the remaining deposit balance shall be refunded, without interest, to the Applicant.

Section 5. Subsequent Analysis and Revision of the Fees. The fees and charges set forth herein are adopted and implemented by the City Council in reliance on the Record identified above. The City may continue to conduct further study and analysis to determine whether the fees and charges for City services should be revised. When additional information is available, the City Council may review the fees and charges to determine that the amounts do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the fees and charges are charged.

Section 6. Adjustment. From time to time, as appropriate, City staff are directed to analyze the calculations contained in Exhibit A to determine whether, when applied to current staff billing rates for providing services and activities subject to the Fees, such calculations are no longer adequate to recover the reasonable estimated cost of providing such services and regulatory activities, staff are directed to return to the City Council with a new staff analysis and proposed Fee calculations for consideration and possible adoption by the City Council.

Section 7. Update of Staff Billing Rates. City staff are directed to update the calculation of the current Staff Billing Rates for services and regulatory activities subject to City fees pursuant to this Resolution and to update the current Fee Schedule and Staff Billing Rate schedule to reflect such updated rates as appropriate, and to post such updated rates and the Fee Schedule and to otherwise make the updated current fee amount information available to any interested member of the pubic.

Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. In accordance with Government Code Section 66017, all new and/or increased fees and charges upon a development project, as defined in Government Code Section 66000, which apply to the filing, accepting, reviewing, approving, or issuing of an application, permit, or entitlement to use shall be effective no sooner than 60 days following the effective date of this Resolution. All other new and/or increased fees and charges not subject to Government Code Section 66017 that are set forth in Exhibit A shall become effective immediately.

Section 9. Repealed. These fees and charges shall supersede the corresponding fees previously established and adopted by the City Council. All previously adopted and conflicting fees and charges and all resolutions, including, but not limited to, Resolution Nos. 79-2006, 042-2009 and 043-2009, 022-2011, 047-2014, 051-2016 and other actions of the City Council are hereby repealed to the extent they conflict with the contents of this Resolution.

Section 10. Severability. The individual fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution and all portions of this Resolution are severable. Should any of the fees or charges or any portion of this Resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable by a body of competent jurisdiction, then the remaining fees, charges and/or Resolution portions shall be and continue in full force and effect, except as to those fees, charges, and/or Resolution portions that have been adjudged invalid. The City Council of the City of Cloverdale hereby declares that it would have adopted each of the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution, and this Resolution and each section, subsection, clause, sentence, phrase and other portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more of the fees, charges, or sections, subsections, clauses, sentences, phrases or other portions of this Resolution may be held invalid or unconstitutional.
80

Page 7 of 7 ends

The foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on the 26th day of June 2024 by the following roll call vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
______________________ _______________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Attachment:

Exhibit A – Master Fee Schedule
81 82
83 84
85 86
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 94
95 96
97 98
99 City Council
Agenda Item Summary
Agenda Item:

Meeting Date:

H.2
June 26, 2024
Agenda Section
Public Hearing
Staff Contact
Vanessa Apodaca, Interim City Engineer
Agenda Item Title
Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District – Public Hearing, Approval of the Annual Engineer’s Report, and Resolutions Authorizing Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 Resolution Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Assessment Diagram and the Annual Assessment Amounts, and Authorizing the Levying and Collection of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Zone 1 Resolution Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Assessment Diagram and the Annual Assessment Amounts, and Authorizing the Levying and Collection of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Zone 2 Resolution Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Assessment Diagram and the Annual Assessment Amounts, and Authorizing the Levying and Collection of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Zone 3 Resolution Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Confirming the Assessment Diagram and the Annual Assessment Amounts, and Authorizing the Levying and Collection of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Zones 4, 5, 6 and 7 Summary
The Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (District) was initially formed by the City in 1997 in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 to pay for costs associated with the maintenance of landscaping and the creek area within the Jefferson Springs IV Subdivision. This became Zone 1 of the District. Additional zones have been annexed into the District over time and there are currently seven zones in the District. Maps of each of the Zones are included in the attached Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Annual Engineer’s Report, Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (Engineer’s Report).

Assessments are levied annually within the District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act). All assessments described in the Engineer’s Report and ultimately approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act and are in compliance with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (Article XIIID), which was enacted with the passage of Proposition 218 in November 1996. Affected property owners approved formation of the District in an election held in compliance with Article XIIID and the Mitigation Fee Act in 1997. The property owners also approved an escalation clause for future years that allows the assessment to increase in accordance with changes to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). This is tracked by the maximum annual assessment amount, or maximum allowable rate. Any future increase in the assessment rate in excess of the maximum allowable rate or substantial changes in the services provided for a particular zone would require balloting of the property owners within that zone.

On January 24, 2024, the City Council began the annual proceedings for the 2024-25 Fiscal Year and appointed Coastland Civil Engineering as Engineer of Work. The Engineer’s Report was prepared and filed in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act and was presented to the City Council for their 100
consideration on April 24, 2024. At that time the City Council preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report, adopted Resolutions of Intent and set the time and date of the public protest hearing.

This is the third of three City Council meetings for the FY 2024-25 assessments. At this time, the Council conducts a public hearing and may then authorize the levying and collection of assessments for FY 2024-25.

The assessments cannot be increased above those stated in the Resolutions of Intent adopted on April 24, 2024.

For FY 2024-25, there are no proposed new zones or annexations into the District. For FY 2024-25, assessments are proposed to increase for three of the seven zones in the District, Zone 1 – Jefferson Springs, Zone 3 – The Cottages, and Zone 4 – The Vineyards. The assessments for Zone 2 – Vintage Meadows, Zone 5 – Ioli Ranch, Zone 6 – Brookside Terrace and Zone 7 – Sunrise Hills are proposed to decrease.

The proposed budgets for each zone are described in detail in the preliminary Engineer’s Report. Funding sources include assessment revenues, annual reserves, miscellaneous revenue allocations and, in Zones 2, General Fund contributions. In Zone 2, the General Fund contribution provides the general benefit portion of the cost of operation and maintenance of Vintage Meadow Park, determined to be $7,516.91 for FY 2024- 25 (see Part D of the Preliminary Engineer’s Report for an analysis of special verses general benefits). This zone will require ongoing General Fund contributions in future years.

The proposed assessments for Zones 1 and 4 are at, or essentially at, the maximum allowable amount without balloting of the property owners, as discussed above. In 2011, the City established a policy to maintain a reserve fund balance of 25% of operating expenses in each of the zones to better manage existing and pending expenses. The reserves for Zones 2, 3, 5 and 7 are projected to end FY 2024-25 at this target level. The reserve balances for Zones 1, 4 and 6 are projected to end FY 2024-25 below the 25% target reserve level, at 2%, 14% and 0%, respectively.

The maximum allowed assessment in each Zone is proposed to be increased by the 2023 CPI adjustment of

2.6% to account for inflation.

In order to avoid potential conflicts of interest, the actions have been broken into four (4) separate Resolutions for the following Zones: Zone 1 only (Jefferson Springs), Zone 2 only (Vintage Meadows); Zone 3 only (The Cottages) and Zones 4, 5, 6 and 7 together (The Vineyards at Cloverdale, Ioli Ranch, Brookside Terrace and Sunrise Hills). Due to the need for a quorum to vote on each resolution, no more than two Councilmembers can be absent for the vote on each Resolution. To the extent that three or more potential conflicts exist in a zone, the City will go through a random selection process to choose enough Councilmember(s) to create a quorum.

The City is required to forward the approved assessments to the County in August in order for them to appear on the FY 2024-25 property tax rolls.

Options

1. Adopt Resolutions approving the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report as filed, and authorizing assessments for levying and collection for FY 2024-25.

2. Adopt Resolutions approving the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report as modified, and authorizing assessments for levying and collection for FY 2024-25.

3. Terminate the proceedings and do not levy or collect annual assessment for the maintenance of the seven Zones.
101
Budget/Financial Impact
Over 95% of the costs associated with these annual proceedings and the annual operation, maintenance and administration that confer special benefits to the parcels within the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District are to be recovered from the annual assessments levied on the properties within the District.

The total proposed Assessment District budget for FY 2024-25 is $290,721.43, which is a 9.4% increase from the FY 2023-24 overall budget of $265,659.25. The funding sources are $183,038.52 from proposed assessment revenues levied and collected during FY 2024-25, $78,022.00 from available annual reserves, $22,143.00 from zone miscellaneous reserve allocation funds and $7,516.91 from the General Fund.

Available zone reserves and/or miscellaneous revenue allocation will be used in all zones as needed and as available to supplement the assessment revenue. General Fund monies will be used to pay for general benefits related to the Vintage Meadows Park in Zone 2. The assessments for Zones 1, 3, and 4 are proposed to increase to $258.56, $436.02, and $455.28 per ESD, respectively. The assessments for Zones 2, 5, 6 and 7 are proposed to decrease to $252.02, $95.70 and $63.44 per ESD, respectively.

The maximum assessment in each Zone is proposed to be increased by the 2023 CPI adjustment of 2.6% to account for inflation.

Subcommittee Recommendation
N/A
Recommended Council Action
Consider Resolutions Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report as filed, confirming the assessment diagram and amounts as set forth therein and authorizing the levying and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment.

Attachments:

1. Budget Review FY 20224-25 Spreadsheet

2. Resolution - Zone 1

3. Resolution - Zone 2

4. Resolution - Zone 3

5. Resolution - Zone 4, 5, 6, 7

6. FY 2024-25 Annual Engineer’s Report (without assessment roll) 102
Zone Number and Name
Current Year's
Budget
% Change in
Budget
(From last year)
ESD's Last Year's
Assessment
Proposed
FY 2024-25
Assessment
Reserves Used
(includes Misc.

Rev. Alloc)
General Fund
Contribution
Used
Change in
Assessment
Beginning
Reserve
Projected
Ending Reserve
Ending Reserve
as a Percent of
FY 2024-25
Budget
Zone 1 Jefferson Springs $ 27,828.80 13.7% 67.5 $ 252.00 $ 258.56 $ 10,376.00 $ - $ 6.56 $ 8,027.80 $ 670.80 2% Zone 2 Vintage Meadows $ 87,415.03 -0.6% 206.0 $ 252.22 $ 252.02 $ 27,982.00 $ 7,516.91 $ (0.20) $ 43,871.51 $ 21,826.51 25% Zone 3 The Cottages $ 121,146.78 21.9% 189.0 $ 311.16 $ 436.02 $ 38,739.00 $ - $ 124.86 $ 59,886.52 $ 30,249.52 25% Zone 4 The Vineyards $ 17,922.12 24.5% 29.0 $ 307.56 $ 455.28 $ 4,719.00 $ - $ 147.72 $ 5,668.63 $ 2,503.63 14% Zone 5 Ioli Ranch $ 5,366.90 15.1% 37.0 $ 114.54 $ 95.70 $ 1,826.00 $ - $ (18.84) $ 2,778.81 $ 1,340.81 25% Zone 6 Brookside Terrace $ 11,066.36 1.2% 14.0 $ 751.48 $ 749.24 $ 577.00 $ - $ (2.24) $ - $ - 0% Zone 7 Sunrise Hills $ 19,974.44 -16.3% 63.5 $ 240.36 $ 63.44 $ 15,946.00 $ - $ (176.92) $ 19,367.54 $ 4,987.54 25% Total $ 290,720.43 $100,165.00 $7,516.91
Decrease in assessment anticipated
Increase in assessment anticipated
Reserve Policy: 25% of operating expenses
City of Cloverdale
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
Budget Review FY 2024-25
F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD 5/29/2024 103

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ____–2024
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS, AND

AUTHORIZING THE LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 FOR THE CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR ZONE 1
(PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972)
WHEREAS, on September 9, 1997, the City Council ordered the formation of the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (Assessment District) to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cloverdale intends to levy and collect assessments within the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, during the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25, and the lands to be assessed are located in the City of Cloverdale, Sonoma County; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2024, the City Council adopted a Resolution appointing Coastland Civil Engineering as the Engineer of Work, directing the preparation and filing of the FY 2024-25 Annual Engineer’s Report, and describing the potential changes to the Assessment District; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 2024, the City Council adopted a Resolution of intention to levy and collect assessments, preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Report for FY 2024-25, and setting the date of the public hearing pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the FY 2024-25 the maximum annual assessments will be adjusted up by the allowable 2023 CPI adjustment of +2.6%; and
WHEREAS, for Zone 1 (Jefferson Springs Phases 3 & 4) the actual proposed FY 2024-25 annual assessment to levy and collect is proposed to be $258.56 per equivalent single family dwelling (ESD); and WHEREAS, no annexations to the District are proposed for FY 2024-25; and WHEREAS, on June 12, 2024, the City Council conducted a public hearing and gave every interested person an opportunity to comment on the FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report either in writing or orally and the City Council has considered each comment.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale that the City Council hereby:

1. Approves the annual FY 2024-25 Annual Engineer’s Report as filed, as it pertains to Zone 1.

2. Confirms the assessment diagram and assessment amount as set forth in the FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report and any amendments incorporated at the City Council’s direction and hereby authorizes the levying and collection of the annual assessments set forth in said report for FY 2024-25, as it pertains to Zone 1.
104

3. In order to keep up with inflation, the estimated maximum annual assessment at build out for Zone 1 for FY 2024-25 shall be adjusted up from FY 2023-24 as allowed by the original formation and annexation proceedings, by the 2022 CPI of +2.6%.

4. That this Resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22620 et. al. of the California Streets and Highway Code.

It is hereby certified that the foregoing Resolution No. ____-2024 was duly introduced and duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on this 26th day of June, 2024, by the following voice vote:

AYES in favor of:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED: ATTESTED:
___________________________ _______________________________ Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
105

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ____–2024
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS, AND

AUTHORIZING THE LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 FOR THE CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR ZONE 2
(PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972)
WHEREAS, on September 9, 1997, the City Council ordered the formation of the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (Assessment District) to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cloverdale intends to levy and collect assessments within the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, during the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25, and the lands to be assessed are located in the City of Cloverdale, Sonoma County; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2024, the City Council adopted a Resolution appointing Coastland Civil Engineering as the Engineer of Work, directing the preparation and filing of the FY 2024-25 Annual Engineer’s Report, and describing the potential changes to the Assessment District; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 2024, the City Council adopted a Resolution of intention to levy and collect assessments, preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Report for FY 2024-25, and setting the date of the public hearing pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the FY 2024-25 the maximum annual assessments will be adjusted up by the allowable 2023 CPI adjustment of +2.6%; and
WHEREAS, for Zone 2 (Vintage Meadows)the actual proposed FY 2024-25 annual assessment to levy and collect is proposed to be $252.02 per equivalent single family dwelling (ESD); and WHEREAS, no annexations to the District are proposed for FY 2024-25; and WHEREAS, on June 12, 2024, the City Council conducted a public hearing and gave every interested person an opportunity to comment on the FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report either in writing or orally and the City Council has considered each comment.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale that the City Council hereby:

1. Approves the FY 2024-25 Annual Engineer’s Report as filed, as it pertains to Zone 2.

2. Confirms the assessment diagram and assessment amounts as set forth in the FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report and any amendments incorporated at the City Council’s direction and hereby authorizes the 106
levying and collection of the annual assessments set forth in said report for the FY 2024-25, as it pertains to Zone 2.

3. In order to keep up with inflation, the estimated maximum annual assessments at build out for Zone 2 for FY 2024-25 shall be adjusted up from FY 2023-24 as allowed by the original formation and annexation proceedings, by the 2023 CPI of +2.6%.

4. That this resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22620 et. al. of the California Streets and Highway Code.

AYES in favor of:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED: ATTESTED:
___________________________ _______________________________ Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
107

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ____–2024
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS, AND

AUTHORIZING THE LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 FOR THE CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR ZONE 3
(PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972)
WHEREAS, on September 9, 1997, the City Council ordered the formation of the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (Assessment District) to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cloverdale intends to levy and collect assessments within the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, during the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25, and the lands to be assessed are located in the City of Cloverdale, Sonoma County; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2024, the City Council adopted a Resolution appointing Coastland Civil Engineering as the Engineer of Work, directing the preparation and filing of the FY 2024-25 Annual Engineer’s Report, and describing the potential changes to the Assessment District; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 2024, the City Council adopted a Resolution of intention to levy and collect assessments, preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Report for FY 2024-25, and setting the date of the public hearing pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the FY 2024-25 the maximum annual assessments will be adjusted up by the allowable 2023 CPI adjustment of +2.6%; and
WHEREAS, for Zone 3 (The Cottages) the actual FY 2024-25 annual assessment to levy and collect is proposed to be $436.02 per equivalent single family dwelling (ESD); and WHEREAS, no annexations to the District are proposed for FY 2024-25; and WHEREAS, on June 12, 2024, the City Council conducted a public hearing and gave every interested person an opportunity to comment on the FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report either in writing or orally and the City Council has considered each comment.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale that the City Council hereby:

1. Approves the annual FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report as filed, as it pertains to Zone 3. 108

2. Confirms the assessment diagram and assessment amounts as set forth in the FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report and any amendments incorporated at the City Council’s direction and hereby authorizes the levying and collection of the annual assessments set forth in said report for FY 2024-25, as pertains to Zone 3.

3. In order to keep up with inflation, the estimated maximum annual assessments at build out for Zone 3 for FY 2024-25 shall be adjusted up from FY 2023-24 as allowed by the original formation and annexation proceedings, by the 2023 CPI of +2.6%.

4. That this resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22620 et. al. of the California Streets and Highway Code.

AYES in favor of:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RECUSED:

APPROVED: ATTESTED:
___________________________ ______________________________ Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
109

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ____–2024
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS, AND

AUTHORIZING THE LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 FOR THE CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR ZONES 4, 5, 6 AND 7
(PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972)
WHEREAS, on September 9, 1997, the City Council ordered the formation of the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (Assessment District) to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cloverdale intends to levy and collect assessments within the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, during the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25, and the lands to be assessed are located in the City of Cloverdale, Sonoma County; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2024, the City Council adopted a Resolution appointing Coastland Civil Engineering as the Engineer of Work, directing the preparation and filing of the FY 2024-25 Annual Engineer’s Report, and describing the potential changes to the Assessment District; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 2024, the City Council adopted a Resolution of intention to levy and collect assessments, preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Report for FY 2024-25, and setting the date of the public hearing pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the FY 2024-25 the maximum annual assessments will be adjusted up by the allowable 2023 CPI adjustment of +2.6%; and
WHEREAS, for Zone 4 (The Vineyards) the actual FY 2024-25 annual assessment to levy and collect is proposed to be $455.28 per ESD; and
WHEREAS, for Zone 5 (Ioli Ranch) the actual FY 2024-25 annual assessment to levy and collect is proposed to be $95.70 per ESD; and
WHEREAS, for Zone 6 (Brookside Terrace) the actual FY 2024-25 annual assessment to levy and collect is proposed to be $749.24 per ESD; and
WHEREAS, for Zone 7 (Sunrise Hills Phase I and II) the actual FY 2024-25 annual assessment to levy and collect is proposed to be $63.44 per ESD; and
WHEREAS, no annexations to the District are proposed for FY 2024-25; and WHEREAS, on June 12, 2024, the City Council conducted a public hearing and gave every interested person 110
an opportunity to comment on the FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report either in writing or orally and the City Council has considered each comment.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale that the City Council hereby:

1. Approves the annual FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report as filed, as it pertains to Zones 4, 5, 6 and 7.

2. Confirms the assessment diagram and assessment amounts as set forth in the FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report and any amendments incorporated at the City Council’s direction and hereby authorizes the levying and collection of the annual assessments set forth in said report for FY 2024-25, as pertains to Zones 4, 5, 6 and 7.

3. In order to keep up with inflation, the estimated maximum annual assessments at build out for Zones 4, 5, 6 and 7 for FY 2024-25 shall be adjusted up from FY 2023-24 as allowed by the original formation and annexation proceedings, by the 2023 CPI of +2.6%.

4. That this resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22620 et. al. of the California Streets and Highway Code.

It is hereby certified that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on this 26th day of June, 2024, by the following Roll Call vote:

AYES in favor of:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RECUSED:

APPROVED: ATTESTED:
___________________________ ______________________________ Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
111
FY 2024-25

ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT

CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

COUNTY OF SONOMA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
For Final Approval
June 2024
Prepared By:

Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc.
112
FY 2024-25

CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The undersigned respectfully submits, as directed by the City Council on January 24, 2024, the enclosed Engineer’s Report on the 12th day of June, 2024.

COASTLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.

By: ___
Paul W. Wade, RCE 51909, Exp. 6/30/24
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and the Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the City on the ____ day of _________, 2024.

Mike Maloney, City Clerk, City of Cloverdale
Sonoma County, California
By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and the Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale, California, on the day of __________, 2024.

Mike Maloney, City Clerk, City of Cloverdale
Sonoma County, California
By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and the Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Sonoma on the day of , 2024.

Mike Maloney, City Clerk, City of Cloverdale
Sonoma County, California
By:
113
3 FY 2024-25 ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT

CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
Coastland Civil Engineering, Engineer of Work for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, City of Cloverdale, Sonoma County, California, has prepared this Annual Engineer’s Report, as directed on January 24, 2024, by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale, pursuant to Section 22620 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Background
The Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (Assessment District) was initially formed by the City Council in September of 1997 to fund the costs associated with the operation and maintenance of creek landscaping within the Jefferson Springs Subdivision, Phases 3 and 4.

The Assessment District boundary for this original area is known as Zone 1. Once an Assessment District is created, it is possible to annex new Zones or annex new areas into existing Zones as new subdivisions and parks are developed in the City. During the annual proceedings for FY 2000- 01 and FY 2001-02, respectively, Zone 2 and Zone 3 were annexed into the Assessment District.

During the annual proceedings for FY 2004-05, Zones 4, 5 and 6 were annexed into the Assessment District. In the annual proceedings for FY 2005-06 and FY 2006-07, Zone 7, Sunrise Hills Phases 1 and 2 were annexed into the Assessment District, respectively. For FY 2024-25 there will be no new zones or annexations.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, an Annual Engineer’s Report must be prepared and filed with the City in order to levy and collect assessments on any following fiscal year. On January 24, 2024, the City Council adopted a resolution appointing Coastland Civil Engineering as the Engineer of Work and directed the preparation and filing of this FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report. Once the preliminary Engineer’s Report has been filed, the City Council can then adopt a Resolution of Intent to levy and collect annual assessments for FY 2024-25, preliminarily approve the filed Annual Engineer’s Report and set the time and date of the public protest hearing. The Engineer’s Report outlines the proposed budgets, assessments, improvements, and changes to the Assessment District. These budgets are updated with each subsequent annual Engineer’s Report as required by the 1972 Act.

Since FY 2012-13, the employee time portion of personnel costs have been based on continued tracking of actual time spent for each zone and averaging it for each zone over a 3-year period.

Annual Reserves
In FY 2011-12, the City established a policy goal of maintaining an Annual Reserve balance of 25% of operating expenses in each of the zones. Annual reserves allow the City to better manage existing and pending expenses. Annual reserves are generated in each zone from any unspent 114
4 monies at the end of the fiscal year. “Excess” annual reserves, those projected to exceed 25% at the end of the fiscal year, may be used to reduce assessments.

Proposition 218 and Special Benefits
In 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 which amended the California Constitution by adding Article XIII C and Article XIII D. Those Articles affect the ability of local government to levy and collect taxes, assessments, and property-related fees and charges. With respect to assessment districts, Article XIII D stipulates that a parcel’s assessment not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred upon that parcel. “Special benefit” is defined as “a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large”.

The effects of Proposition 218 with respect to Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts are that special benefits conferred upon assessed parcels through the improvements and services funded by the District must be identified, any general benefit conferred upon the public at large by those same improvements and services must also be identified, and the annual costs of said improvements and services must be apportioned between the two. The cost of services attributable to a general benefit may not be assessed.

In the case of the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, “improvements and services” primarily refers to landscaping in identified areas within each zone and the maintenance thereof, but also includes the operation and maintenance of a public neighborhood park (Vintage Meadows Park).

In general, the special benefits to each parcel provided by maintained landscaping within each zone include:
• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, • Improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, and
• Improved air quality from additional vegetation.

Each parcel within a zone receives a particular and distinct special benefit from the maintenance of the landscaping within that zone even though the landscaping may not be adjacent to each parcel. Although members of the public may walk or drive through a zone and appreciate the aesthetic appeal of the maintained landscaping, this does not necessarily confer a general benefit to the public at large and, in any case, is determined to be negligible relative to the special benefits conferred upon the parcels within a particular zone.

Part D of this report, Method of Apportionment of Assessment, includes further discussion of the special and general benefits conferred by the specific improvements and services within each zone.
115
5 Fiscal Year 2024-25
For FY 2024-25, there will be no new zones or annexations into existing zones.

The total FY 2024-25 Assessment District budget has increased approximately 9.4% from FY 2023-

24. Zones 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 are proposed to have budget increases of 13.7%, 21.9%, 24.5%, 15.1% and 1.2%, respectively. Zones 2 and 7 are proposed to have budget decreases of 0.6%, and 16.3%, respectively.

Assessments for Zones 2, 5, 6 and 7 are proposed to decrease from the FY 2023-24 amounts.

Assessments for Zones 1, 3 and 4 are proposed to increase from FY 2023-24, but do not exceed the maximum assessment allowed.

Zones 2, 3, 5 and 7 are projected to have end-of-year Annual Reserve balances at or above the targeted 25% of operating expenses. Consequently, excess reserves can be utilized in those zones to reduce assessments. The projected ending reserve balances for Zones 2, 3, 5 and 7 are projected to be at 25%. The projected ending reserve balances for Zones 1, 4 and 6 are projected to be at 2%, 14% and 0%, respectively.

The total proposed Assessment District budget for FY 2024-25 is $290,721.43. The total budget for FY 2023-24 was $265,659.25. The funding sources are from proposed annual assessment revenue to be levied and collected during FY 2024-25, available Zone reserves, miscellaneous revenue allocations and General Fund contributions.

To take annual inflation into account, the original 1997 formation proceedings, and all subsequent annexations of new zones into this Assessment District included a maximum annual assessment and an allowance for an annual increase to the maximum annual assessment in accordance with the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI). The annual CPI is based on the All Urban Consumers (San Francisco Area) CPI from the U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. An annual CPI adjustment to the annual assessment is not mandatory. The CPI adjustment for 2023 was +2.6%. If the annual Engineer’s Report recommends any assessment increases up to the sum of the previous year’s maximum assessment plus the allowable annual CPI increase, notices are not required to be sent nor shall a vote be required. If, however, the annual Engineer’s Report recommends any assessment that exceeds the sum of the previous year’s maximum assessment plus the allowable annual CPI increase, noticing and/or voting shall be required in accordance with the provisions applicable to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and California Constitution, Article XIII D (also referred to as Proposition 218).

Table 1, below, summarizes the proposed FY 2024-25 assessments to levy and collect and the new maximum annual assessments allowed to be assessed.
116
6 Table 1. Maximum Annual Assessments and
Proposed Assessment to Levy by Zone
Zone Name
Previous
Maximum
Annual
Assessment
CPI
Increase
Current
Maximum
Annual
Assessment
Proposed
Assessment
to Levy Per
ESD
Zone 1 Jefferson Springs, Phases 3 & 4 $252.01 $6.55 $258.56 $258.56 Zone 2 Vintage Meadows $502.66 $13.07 $515.73 $252.02
Zone 3 The Cottages, Phases 1 - 4 $860.71 $22.38 $883.09 $436.02 Zone 4 The Vineyards $444.69 $11.56 $456.25 $455.28
Zone 5 Ioli Ranch $172.02 $4.47 $176.49 $95.70
Zone 6 Brookside Terrace $751.48 $19.54 $771.02 $749.24 Zone 7 Sunrise Hills, Phases I & II $540.50 $14.10 $554.60 $63.44 The original landscaping and lighting improvements within all seven zones of the Assessment District are completed and have been accepted by the City. The proposed changes, budgets and assessments for FY 2024-25 are included in the description of each zone below. See Part D, ‘Method of Apportionment of Assessment’ of this report for a detailed description of the apportionment methodology for each zone.

Zone 1 - Jefferson Springs, Phases 3 & 4
Zone 1 was formed with the initial formation of the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment in FY 1997-98 and consists of the Jefferson Springs Subdivision, Phases 3 and 4. No new annexations are proposed in Zone 1 for FY 2024-25. Zone 1 is built out and no significant land use changes have occurred during the previous year. For FY 2024-25, the total number of Equivalent Single-Family Dwelling (ESD) is expected to stay the same at 67.5 units.

Zone 1 includes the operation and maintenance of the landscaping and pathway adjacent to the creek, along with related overhead. See the Assessment Diagram (Map) in Part F of this report for the location of the landscape maintenance areas.

The total proposed Zone 1 budget for FY 2024-25 is $27,828.80. This is an increase of approximately 13.7% from the FY 2023-24 budget mostly due to increased employee costs and new contract services. The proposed funding will be from FY 2024-25 assessment revenue, Zone 117
7 1 reserves and a miscellaneous revenue allocation. See Table 2 in Part B for estimated dollar amounts.

For FY 2024-25, the proposed annual assessment to levy and collect for Zone 1 is proposed to increase to $258.56 per Equivalent Single-Family Dwelling (ESD). The ending fiscal year reserves will be 2%, which is below the target minimum level of 25%. In order to keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment is proposed to be adjusted up by the 2023 CPI of +2.6%. (See Table 1). Per both California Constitution, Article XIII D requirements and the formation and annexation proceedings for this Assessment District, future annual assessments will be allowed to reach this adjusted maximum amount without having to send special ballots to the impacted property owners in Zone 1.

Zone 2 - Vintage Meadows
During the annual proceedings for FY 2000-01, a new Zone 2 was annexed into the Assessment District. At that time, Zone 2 consisted of only Vintage Meadows Subdivision, Phase 1.

Annexation was pursuant to Vintage Meadows Subdivision, Phase 1 conditions of approval.

During FY 2002-03 Vintage Meadows, Phases 2 and 3, were annexed into Zone 2 during the annual proceedings pursuant to their conditions of approval. No new annexations are proposed for FY 2024-25. Zone 2 is built out and no significant land use changes have occurred within the last fiscal year. For FY 2024-25, the total number of ESD units is expected to remain at 206.0.

Zone 2 includes the operation and maintenance of Vintage Meadows Park, the back-on landscaping along portions of Foothill Boulevard and S. Franklin Street within the subdivision, the traffic island within Healdsburg Avenue and the area at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Port Circle, south of Zinfandel Court, along with related overhead. All District maintained improvements were completed, accepted by the City and maintained during the 2005-06 fiscal year with the exception of the Vintage Meadows neighborhood park. The park improvements were completed and accepted by Council in the Fall of 2007. Restrooms were added to the park in 2011.

The total proposed Zone 2 budget for FY 2024-25 is $87,415.03. This is a decrease of approximately 0.6% from FY 2023-24.

Prior to FY 2021-22, the costs of the operation and maintenance of the park restrooms were paid by the City from the General Fund. Those costs have since been included in the Zone 2 budget and the Zone 2 budget in Part B of this report reflects a General Fund contribution in excess of the total cost of the operation and maintenance of the park restrooms.

Proposed funding will be from FY 2024-25 assessment revenue, Zone 2 reserves, a miscellaneous revenue allocation, and a General Fund contribution. See Table 2 in Part B for estimated dollar amounts.

For FY 2024-25, the proposed annual assessment to levy and collect for Zone 2 is proposed to 118
8 decrease to $252.02 per ESD. The ending reserve is projected to meet the targeted 25% of the annual budget. In order to keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment for Zone 2 is proposed to be adjusted up by the 2023 CPI of +2.6% (See Table 1). Per both California Constitution, Article XIII D requirements and the formation and annexation proceedings for this Assessment District, future annual assessments will be allowed to reach this adjusted maximum amount without having to send special ballots to the impacted property owners in Zone 2.

Zone 3 – The Cottages, Phases 1, 2, 3 & 4
During the annual proceedings of FY 2001-02, a new Zone 3, consisting of Phases 1, 2 and 3 of The Cottages development in the southern part of the City, was annexed into the Assessment District. In FY 2004-05, Phase 4 of The Cottages subdivision was annexed into Zone 3. No new annexations are proposed for FY 2024-25. Zone 3 is built out and no significant land use changes have occurred during the past fiscal year. For FY 2024-25, the total number of ESD units is expected to remain at 189.0.

Zone 3 includes maintenance of the linear park along Muscat Creek, “back-on” landscape maintenance along a portion of Foothill Boulevard within Zone 3, maintenance of the preserved wetlands area at the corner of Ranch House Drive and Elbridge Drive, weed abatement of the area just west of Ranch House Drive and Elbridge Avenue and other improvements within Zone 3 along with related overhead. See the Assessment Diagram (Map) in Part F of this report for a location of the landscape maintenance areas.

The total proposed Zone 3 budget for FY 2024-25 is $121,146.78. This is an increase of approximately 21.9% from the FY 2023-24 budget. Proposed funding will be from FY 2024-25 assessment revenue, available Zone 3 reserves and a miscellaneous revenue allocation. See Table 2 in Part B for estimated dollar amounts.

The assessment for FY 2024-25 is proposed to increase to $436.02 per ESD. This is less than the maximum allowable assessment for Zone 3. The ending reserve is projected to be 25% of the annual operating budget, meeting the target minimum 25% level.

In order to keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment per ESD is proposed to be adjusted up by the 2023 CPI of +2.6%. (See Table 1). Per both California Constitution, Article XIII D requirements, and the formation and annexation proceedings for this Assessment District, future annual assessments will be allowed to reach this adjusted maximum amount without having to send special ballots to the impacted property owners in Zone 3.

Zone 4 – The Vineyards
During the annual proceedings for FY 2004-05, Zone 4, The Vineyards was annexed into the Assessment District. For FY 2024-25, no annexations or changes are proposed. Zone 4 is built out and during the previous year, no significant land use changes have occurred For FY 2024-25, the total number of ESD units is expected to remain at 29.0. 119
9 Zone 4 includes maintenance of the “back-on” landscaping along Foothill Boulevard and Mount Diablo Way, maintenance of a detention basin area and other improvements within Zone 4 along with related overhead. See the Assessment Diagram (Map) in Part F of this report for a location of the landscape maintenance areas.

The total proposed Zone 4 budget for FY 2024-25 is $17,922.12. This is an increase of about

24.5% from the FY 2023-24 budget. The proposed funding will be from FY 2024-25 assessment revenue, available Zone 4 reserves and a miscellaneous revenue allocation. See Table 2 in Part B for estimated dollar amounts.

For FY 2024-25, the proposed annual assessment to levy and collect for Zone 4 is proposed to decrease to $455.28 per ESD. This is below the maximum allowable assessment for Zone 4. The ending fiscal year reserves will be 14%, which is below the target minimum level of 25%. In order to keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment per ESD is proposed to be adjusted up by the 2023 CPI of +2.6%. (See Table 1). Per both California Constitution, Article XIII D requirements, and the formation and annexation proceedings for this Assessment District, future annual assessments will be allowed at this adjusted maximum amount without having to send special ballots to the impacted property owners in Zone 4.

Zone 5 – Ioli Ranch
During the annual proceedings for FY 2004-05, Zone 5, Ioli Ranch, was annexed into the Assessment District. For FY 2024-25, no annexations or changes are proposed. Zone 5 is built out and during the previous year, no significant land use changes have occurred. For FY 2024-25, the total number of ESD units is expected to remain at 37.0.

Zone 5 includes maintenance of the “back on” landscaping improvements along Cloverdale Boulevard within Zone 5 along with related overhead. See the Assessment Diagram (Map) in Part F of this report for a location of the landscape maintenance areas.

The total proposed Zone 5 budget for FY 2024-25 is $5,366.90. This is an increase of about 15.1% from the FY 2023-24 budget. The proposed funding will be from FY 2024-25 assessment revenue and miscellaneous revenue allocations. See Table 2 in Part B for estimated dollar amounts.

For FY 2024-25, the proposed annual assessment to levy and collect for Zone 5 is proposed to decrease to $95.70 per ESD. This is below the FY 2024-25 maximum allowable assessment for Zone 5. The ending reserve is projected to be 25% of the annual operating budget, meeting the target minimum 25% level. In order to keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment per ESD is proposed to be adjusted up by the 2023 CPI of +2.6%. (See Table 1). Per both California Constitution, Article XIII D requirements, and the formation and annexation proceedings for this Assessment District, future annual assessments will be allowed at this adjusted maximum amount without having to send special ballots to the impacted property owners in Zone 5. 120
10 Zone 6 – Brookside Terrace
During the annual proceedings for FY 2004-05, Zone 6, Brookside Terrace, was annexed into the Assessment District. For FY 2024-25, no annexations or changes are proposed. Zone 6 is built out and during the previous year, no significant land use changes have occurred. For FY 2024- 25, the total number of ESD units is expected to remain at 14.0.

Zone 6 includes the “back-on” landscape maintenance along a portion of Cloverdale Boulevard and West Brookside Drive and the small park on West Brookside Drive along with related overhead. See the Assessment Diagram (Map) in Part F of this report for a location of the landscape maintenance areas.

The total proposed Zone 6 budget for FY 2024-25 is $11,066.36. This is an increase of approximately 1.2% from the FY 2023-24 budget. The proposed funding will be from FY 2024-25 assessment revenue and a miscellaneous revenue allocation. See Table 2 in Part B for estimated dollar amounts.

For FY 2024-25 the proposed annual assessment to levy and collect for Zone 6 is proposed to increase to $749.24 per ESD. This is equal to the maximum allowable assessment for Zone 6.

Ending fiscal year reserves are anticipated to be at 0%, below the target minimum 25% level. In order to keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment per ESD is proposed to be adjusted up by the 2023 CPI of +2.6%. (See Table 1). Per both California Constitution, Article XIII D requirements, and the formation and annexation proceedings for this Assessment District, future annual assessments will be allowed to reach this adjusted maximum amount without having to send special ballots to the impacted property owners in Zone 6.

Zone 7 – Sunrise Hills Phase I and II
During the annual proceedings for FY 2005-06, Zone 7, Sunrise Hills Phase 1, was annexed into the Assessment District. In FY 2006-07, Sunrise Hills Phase 2 was annexed into existing Zone 7.

Landscaping and lighting improvements were accepted by the City in 2008. No new annexations are proposed for this zone for FY 2024-25. Zone 7 is built out. During the previous year, minor land use changes have increased the total number of ESD units by 2.5 to 63.5 ESDs.

Zone 7 includes “back-on” landscape maintenance along a portion of Foothill Boulevard, maintenance of the open space and drainage easement (wetland) area and street lighting costs installed with Phase 1, hydraulic and drainage easement maintenance, public trail maintenance and additional streetlights installed with Phase 2 along with related overhead. See the Assessment Diagram (Map) in Part F of this report for a location of the landscape maintenance areas.

The total proposed Zone 7 budget for FY 2024-25 is $19,975.44. This is a decrease of about 16.3% from the FY 2023-24 budget. The proposed funding will be from FY 2024-25 assessment revenue, 121
11 available Zone 7 reserves and a miscellaneous revenue allocation. See Table 2 in Part B for estimated dollar amounts.

For FY 2024-25, the proposed annual assessment to levy and collect for Zone 7 is proposed to decrease to $63.44 per ESD. This is below the maximum allowable assessment for Zone 7. The ending reserves are anticipated to be 25%, meeting the target minimum level. In order to keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment per ESD is proposed to be adjusted up by the 2023 CPI of +2.6%. (See Table 1). Per both California Constitution, Article XIII D requirements, and the formation and annexation proceedings for this Assessment District, future annual assessments will be allowed to reach this adjusted maximum amount without having to send special ballots to the impacted property owners in Zone 7. 122
12 FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report Format
This FY 2024-25 Engineer’s Report consists of six parts as follows:

PART A Plans & Specifications- This portion of the Engineer’s Report describes any plans and specifications that may be needed for the installation of the improvements.

If plans and specifications exist, they are filed with the City Clerk. Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are part of this Engineer’s Report and are included in it by reference.

PART B Budget Cost Estimates – This portion of the Engineer’s Report lists the total filed and approved budgets for Zones 1 through 7, an overall Budget Summary for the seven Zones, a detailed budget for each zone, and a Summary of Fund Balances.

PART C Assessment Roll – This part consists of a listing of FY 2024-25 assessments on each benefited parcel of land within the Assessment District. The FY 2024-25 assessment amount is the estimated cost each parcel will contribute towards the operation and maintenance of the improvements within each respective Zone of the Assessment District.

PART D Method of Apportionment of Assessment – This part consists of a statement of the method used by Engineer of Work to determine the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel within the Assessment District.

PART E Property Owner’s List – This portion includes the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this Assessment District, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes. The Assessor Parcel Number (A.P.N.) for each parcel keys the list to the Assessment Roll shown in Part C.

PART F Assessment Diagrams – This part consists of Assessment Diagrams (maps) showing all of the parcels of real property within the boundaries of the seven zones of the Assessment District. The Assessor Parcel Number (A.P.N.) for each parcel keys the property to the Assessment Roll shown in Part C. The A.P.N.’s are shown in the Assessor’s Maps available at the County of Sonoma Assessor’s Office. 123
13 PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The Assessment District will operate and maintain the landscape and related improvements in Zones 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 asthey have all been completed and accepted by the City of Cloverdale.

Maintenance in each of these seven Zones may include repair, removal or replacement of any hardscape improvement, damaged irrigation facilities or diseased landscaping, weed and brush clearing, street lighting and other allowable maintenance items per Section 22531 of the Streets and Highways Code for the life of the Assessment District. 124
14 PART B

BUDGET COST ESTIMATE
The attached sheets include the budgets for FY 2024-25 for all those costs associated with the operation and maintenance in each of the seven zones within the Assessment District. The budgets have been separated by zone for clarity. The total budget summary for FY 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District is as follows:

As Filed
With City
As Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally Approved
at Public Hearing
Zone 1 $27,828.80 $27,828.80 $
Zone 2 $87,415.03 $87,415.03 $
Zone 3 $121,146.78 $121,146.78 $
Zone 4 $17,922.12 $17,922.12 $
Zone 5 $5,366.90 $5,366.90 $
Zone 6 $11,066.36 $11,066.36 $
Zone 7 $19,975.71 $19,975.44 $
Total $290,721.70 $290,721.43 $
Table 2. Budget Summary
Budget
Projected
Assessment
Revenue
Reserves Used
(Including
Misc. Revenue
Allocation)
General
Fund
Contribution
Proposed FY
Assessment
Per ESD
Number
of ESD's
Zone 1 $27,828.80 $17,452.80 $10,376.00 $0.00 $258.56 67.5 Zone 2 $87,415.03 $51,916.12 $27,982.00 $7,516.91 $252.02 206.0 Zone 3 $121,146.78 $82,407.78 $38,739.00 $0.00 $436.02 189.0 Zone 4 $17,922.12 $13,203.12 $4,719.00 $0.00 $455.28 29.0 Zone 5 $5,366.90 $3,540.90 $1,826.00 $0.00 $95.70 37.0
Zone 6 $11,066.36 $10,489.36 $577.00 $0.00 $749.24 14.0 Zone 7 $19,975.44 $4,028.44 $15,946.00 $0.00 $63.44 63.5 Total $290,721.43 $183,038.52 $100,165.00 $7,516.91 -- -- 125
2023-24 Budget 2024-25 Budget
Labor and Administration
Employee Costs (Previously Labor and Admin.) $16,743.00 $18,141.00 Overhead/Administration Costs $239.00 $338.00
Subtotal Labor and Administration $16,982.00 $18,479.00 Services
Assessment Engineering Services $1,637.30 $1,682.10
Miscellaneous Contract Services $550.00 $1,859.00
Computer Maintenance $61.00 $425.00
Vehicle Repair $350.00 $350.00
General Repair & Maintenance $300.00 $300.00
Training/Travel $75.00 $75.00
Operating Supplies $1,500.00 $1,000.00
Subtotal Services $4,473.30 $5,691.10
Supplies
Small Tools & Equipment $100.00 $100.00
Fuel $450.00 $800.00
Utilities-Gas & Electric $0.00 $0.00
Utilities-Water $1,300.00 $1,455.00
Subtotal Supplies $1,850.00 $2,355.00
Subtotal Expenses $23,305.30 $26,525.10
Contingency $1,166.43 $1,303.70
TOTAL EXPENSES $24,471.73 $27,828.80
Contribution from Annual Reserves $4,251.73 $7,357.00
Contribution from Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $3,210.00 $3,019.00 TOTAL COSTS $17,010.00 $17,452.80
TOTAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE $17,010.00 $17,452.80
Estimated Number of ESD Units in Zone 1 67.5 67.5
Proposed Assessment per ESD for Zone 1 $252.00 $258.56
2023-24 Zone 1 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $252.01 2023 Cost of Living Increase (CPI) 2.60%
2024-25 Zone 1 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $258.56

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget
Zone 1 - Jefferson Springs
Creek Landscaping
F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 15 5/29/2024
126
2023-24 Budget 2024-25 Budget
Labor and Administration
Employee Costs (Previously Labor and Admin.) $43,757.00 $43,552.00 Overhead/Administration Costs $1,008.00 $878.00
Subtotal Labor and Administration $44,765.00 $44,430.00 Services
Assessment Engineering Services $5,873.10 $5,291.10
Miscellaneous Contract Services $15,800.00 $15,800.00
Computer Maintenance $180.00 $425.00
Vehicle Repair $475.00 $375.00
General Repair & Maintenance $1,930.00 $1,930.00
Training/Travel $225.00 $225.00
Operating Supplies $5,020.00 $5,020.00
Subtotal Services $29,503.10 $29,066.10
Supplies
Small Tools & Equipment $280.00 $280.00
Fuel $1,400.00 $900.00
Utilities-Gas & Electric $800.00 $525.00
Utilities-Water $7,000.00 $8,050.00
Subtotal Supplies $9,480.00 $9,755.00
Subtotal Expenses $83,748.10 $83,251.10
Contingency $4,190.22 $4,163.93
TOTAL EXPENSES $87,938.32 $87,415.03
Contribution from General Fund $11,274.00 $7,516.91
Contribution from Annual Reserves $17,500.00 $22,045.00 Contribution from Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $7,207.00 $5,937.00 TOTAL COSTS $51,957.32 $51,916.12
TOTAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE $51,957.32 $51,916.12
Estimated Number of ESD Units in Zone 2 206.0 206.0
Proposed Assessment per ESD for Zone 2 $252.22 $252.02
2023-24 Zone 2 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $502.66 2023 Cost of Living Increase (CPI) 2.60%
2024-25 Zone 2 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $515.73 Street Landscaping and Park

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget
Zone 2 - Vintage Meadows
F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 16 5/29/2024
127
2023-24 Budget 2024-25 Budget
Labor and Administration
Employee Costs (Previously Labor and Admin.) $54,640.00 $58,048.00 Overhead/Administration Costs $1,102.00 $1,217.00
Subtotal Labor and Administration $55,742.00 $59,265.00 Services
Assessment Engineering Services $6,640.60 $7,333.00
Miscellaneous Contract Services $2,500.00 $24,729.00
Computer Maintenance $270.00 $425.00
Vehicle Repair $525.00 $525.00
General Repair & Maintenance $1,600.00 $1,600.00
Training/Travel $337.00 $337.00
Operating Supplies $4,020.00 $4,020.00
Subtotal Services $15,892.60 $38,969.00
Supplies
Small Tools & Equipment $370.00 $370.00
Fuel $2,000.00 $1,250.00
Utilities-Gas & Electric $650.00 $405.00
Utilities-Water $20,000.00 $15,120.00
Subtotal Supplies $23,020.00 $17,145.00
Subtotal Expenses $94,654.60 $115,379.00
Contingency $4,735.64 $5,767.78
TOTAL EXPENSES $99,390.24 $121,146.78
Contribution from Annual Reserves $31,107.00 $29,637.00 Contribution from Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $9,474.00 $9,102.00 TOTAL COSTS $58,809.24 $82,407.78
TOTAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE $58,809.24 $82,407.78
Estimated Number of ESD Units in Zone 3 189.0 189.0
Proposed Assessment per ESD for Zone 3 $311.16 $436.02
2023-24 Zone 3 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $860.71 2023 Cost of Living Increase (CPI) 2.60%
2024-25 Zone 3 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $883.09 Landscaping & Maintenance

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget
Zone 3 - The Cottages
F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 17 5/29/2024
128
2023-24 Budget 2024-25 Budget
Labor and Administration
Employee Costs (Previously Labor and Admin.) $7,611.00 $9,640.00 Overhead/Administration Costs $161.00 $187.00
Subtotal Labor and Administration $7,772.00 $9,827.00
Services
Assessment Engineering Services $1,000.10 $1,127.80
Miscellaneous Contract Services $1,100.00 $1,100.00
Computer Maintenance $48.00 $425.00
Vehicle Repair $200.00 $200.00
General Repair & Maintenance $260.00 $260.00
Training/Travel $60.00 $60.00
Operating Supplies $500.00 $500.00
Subtotal Services $3,168.10 $3,672.80
Supplies
Small Tools & Equipment $50.00 $50.00
Fuel $200.00 $200.00
Utilities-Gas & Electric $160.00 $185.00
Utilities-Water $2,900.00 $3,810.00
Subtotal Supplies $3,310.00 $4,245.00
Subtotal Expenses $14,250.10 $17,744.80
Contingency $143.40 $177.32
TOTAL EXPENSES $14,393.50 $17,922.12
Contribution from Annual Reserves $4,215.26 $3,165.00
Contribution from Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $1,259.00 $1,554.00 TOTAL COSTS $8,919.24 $13,203.12
TOTAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE $8,919.24 $13,203.12
Estimated Number of ESD Units in Zone 4 29.0 29.0
Proposed Assessment per ESD for Zone 4 $307.56 $455.28
2023-24 Zone 4 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $444.69 2023 Cost of Living Increase (CPI) 2.60%
2024-25 Zone 4 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $456.25

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget
Zone 4 - The Vineyards
Landscaping & Maintenance
F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 18 5/29/2024
129
2023-24 Budget 2024-25 Budget
Labor and Administration
Employee Costs (Previously Labor and Admin.) $2,296.00 $2,414.00 Overhead/Administration Costs $56.00 $56.00
Subtotal Labor and Administration $2,352.00 $2,470.00
Services
Assessment Engineering Services $323.70 $337.70
Miscellaneous Contract Services $0.00 $0.00
Computer Maintenance $20.00 $425.00
Vehicle Repair $150.00 $300.00
General Repair & Maintenance $100.00 $100.00
Training/Travel $20.00 $20.00
Operating Supplies $181.00 $181.00
Subtotal Services $794.70 $1,363.70
Supplies
Small Tools & Equipment $20.00 $20.00
Fuel $300.00 $200.00
Utilities-Gas & Electric $150.00 $140.00
Utilities-Water $1,000.00 $1,120.00
Subtotal Supplies $1,470.00 $1,480.00
Subtotal Expenses $4,616.70 $5,313.70
Contingency $46.28 $53.20
TOTAL EXPENSES $4,662.98 $5,366.90
Contribution from Annual Reserves $0.00 $1,438.00
Contribution from Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $425.00 $388.00 TOTAL COSTS $4,237.98 $3,540.90
TOTAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE $4,237.98 $3,540.90
Estimated Number of ESD Units in Zone 5 37.0 37.0
Proposed Assessment per ESD for Zone 5 $114.54 $95.70
2023-24 Zone 5 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $172.02 2023 Cost of Living Increase (CPI) 2.60%
2024-25 Zone 5 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $176.49 Zone 5 - Ioli Ranch
Landscaping & Maintenance

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget

CITY OF CLOVERDALE
F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 19 5/29/2024
130
2023-24 Budget 2024-25 Budget
Labor and Administration
Employee Costs (Previously Labor and Admin.) $5,134.00 $4,369.00 Overhead/Administration Costs $133.00 $116.00
Subtotal Labor and Administration $5,267.00 $4,485.00
Services
Assessment Engineering Services $759.80 $696.30
Miscellaneous Contract Services $0.00 $0.00
Computer Maintenance $40.00 $425.00
Vehicle Repair $175.00 $175.00
General Repair & Maintenance $70.00 $195.00
Training/Travel $50.00 $50.00
Operating Supplies $365.00 $365.00
Subtotal Services $1,459.80 $1,906.30
Supplies
Small Tools & Equipment $40.00 $40.00
Fuel $340.00 $340.00
Utilities-Gas & Electric $130.00 $150.00
Utilities-Water $3,600.00 $4,035.00
Subtotal Supplies $4,110.00 $4,565.00
Subtotal Expenses $10,836.80 $10,956.30
Contingency $99.72 $110.06
TOTAL EXPENSES $10,936.52 $11,066.36
Contribution from General Fund $0.00 $0.00
Contribution from Annual Reserves $0.00 $0.00
Contribution from Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $415.80 $577.00 TOTAL COSTS $10,520.72 $10,489.36
TOTAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE $10,520.72 $10,489.36
Estimated Number of ESD Units in Zone 6 14.0 14.0
Proposed Assessment per ESD for Zone 6 $751.48 $749.24
2023-24 Zone 6 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $751.48 2023 Cost of Living Increase (CPI) 2.60%
2024-25 Zone 6 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $771.02 Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget
Zone 6 - Brookside Terrace
Landscaping & Maintenance

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 20 5/29/2024
131
2023-24 Budget 2024-25 Budget
Labor and Administration
Employee Costs (Previously Labor and Admin.) $10,179.00 $10,222.00 Overhead/Administration Costs $293.00 $209.00
Subtotal Labor and Administration $10,472.00 $10,431.00 Services
Assessment Engineering Services $1,656.00 $1,257.00
Miscellaneous Contract Services $2,500.00 $2,000.00
Computer Maintenance $80.00 $425.00
Vehicle Repair $250.00 $250.00
General Repair & Maintenance $400.00 $400.00
Training/Travel $100.00 $100.00
Operating Supplies $1,131.00 $800.00
Subtotal Services $6,117.00 $5,232.00
Supplies
Small Tools & Equipment $180.00 $180.00
Fuel $600.00 $425.00
Utilities-Gas & Electric $260.00 $150.00
Utilities-Water $6,000.00 $3,360.00
Subtotal Supplies $7,040.00 $4,115.00
Subtotal Expenses $23,629.00 $19,778.00
Contingency $236.96 $196.44
TOTAL EXPENSES $23,865.96 $19,974.44
Contribution from Annual Reserves $7,430.00 $14,380.00
Contribution from Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $1,774.00 $1,566.00 TOTAL COSTS $14,661.96 $4,028.44
TOTAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE $14,661.96 $4,028.44
Estimated Number of ESD Units in Zone 7 61.0 63.5
Proposed Assessment per ESD for Zone 7 $240.36 $63.44
2023-24 Zone 7 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $540.50 2023 Cost of Living Increase (CPI) 2.60%
2024-25 Zone 7 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD $554.60 Landscaping & Maintenance

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget
Zone 7 - Sunrise Hills
F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 21 5/29/2024
132
FY 2024-25
Zone 1 - Jefferson Springs
Estimated Starting Reserve Fund Balance July 1 $8,027.80 Estimated Assessment Revenue $17,452.80
Estimated Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $3,019.00
Estimated Expenses $27,828.80
Estimated Ending Reserve Fund Balance June 30 $670.80
As a percent of Annual Operating Expenses 2%
Zone 2 - Vintage Meadows
Estimated Starting Reserve Fund Balance July 1 $43,871.51 Estimated Revenue $51,916.12
General Fund Contribution $7,516.91
Estimated Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $5,937.00
Estimated Expenses $87,415.03
Estimated Ending Reserve Fund Balance June 30 $21,826.51 As a percent of Annual Operating Expenses 25%
Zone 3 - The Cottages
Estimated Starting Reserve Fund Balance July 1 $59,886.52 Estimated Revenue $82,407.78
Estimated Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $9,102.00
Estimated Expenses $121,146.78
Estimated Ending Reserve Fund Balance June 30 $30,249.52 As a percent of Annual Operating Expenses 25%
Zone 4 - The Vineyards
Estimated Starting Reserve Fund Balance July 1 $5,668.63 Estimated Revenue $13,203.12
Estimated Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $1,554.00
Estimated Expenses $17,922.12
Estimated Ending Reserve Fund Balance June 30 $2,503.63 As a percent of Annual Operating Expenses 14%

CITY OF CLOVERDALE
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget
Summary of Fund Balances
F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 22 5/29/2024 133
FY 2024-25

CITY OF CLOVERDALE
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget
Summary of Fund Balances
Zone 5 - Ioli Ranch
Estimated Starting Reserve Fund Balance July 1 $2,778.81 Estimated Revenue $3,540.90
Estimated Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $388.00
Estimated General Fund Contribution $0.00
Estimated Annual Expenses $5,366.90
Estimated Ending Reserve Fund Balance June 30 $1,340.81 As a percent of Annual Operating Expenses 25%
Zone 6 - Brookside Terrace
Estimated Starting Reserve Fund Balance July 1 $0.00
Estimated Revenue $10,489.36
Estimated Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $577.00
Estimated General Fund Contribution $0.00
Estimated Expenses $11,066.36
Estimated Ending Reserve Fund Balance June 30 $0.00
As a percent of Annual Operating Expenses 0%
Zone 7 - Sunrise Hills
Estimated Starting Reserve Fund Balance July 1 $19,367.54 Estimated Revenue $4,028.44
Estimated Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation $1,566.00
Estimated Expenses $19,974.44
Estimated Ending Reserve Fund Balance June 30 $4,987.54 As a percent of Annual Operating Expenses 25%
Note: Miscellaneous Revenue Allocation includes interest income plus ad valorem allocations.

F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 23 5/29/2024 134
24 PART C
FY 2024-25 ASSESSMENT ROLL
The total proposed assessment revenues for FY 2024-25 for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District is $183,039.79 from the following sources:

Revenue Source
$17,452.80 From Zone 1
$51,916.12 From Zone 2
$82,407.78 From Zone 3
$13,203.12 From Zone 4
$3,540.90 From Zone 5
$10,489.36 From Zone 6
$4,028.44 From Zone 7
The individual annual assessment for each parcel within each of the seven zones of the Assessment District is listed in the following pages. The lines and dimensions of each parcel are shown on the Assessor’s Maps for the City of Cloverdale available at the County of Sonoma Assessor’s Office.
135

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS

BROOKSIDE
TERRACE 001-280-009-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $

CORREIA ZACHARY J & WILSON-CORREIA JACILYN
M 96 W BROOKSIDE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
001-280-010-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $

NETTLETON ERIC & HUTCHINSON MAUREEN
ROBIN 94 W BROOKSIDE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
001-280-011-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $

GRACE JOHN ARNOLD TR & GRACE MARY RUIZ
TR 807 S VERMONT ST COVINGTON, LA 70433
001-280-012-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $

MORA PEDRO LOPEZ & EUFRACIO VICENTE
LOPEZ 64 WEST BROOKSIDE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
001-280-013-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $ PINER PROPERTIES INC 2581 PINER RD SANTA ROSA, CA 95401 001-280-014-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $

FRENCH ROSE KWANKAEW & FRENCH KENNETH
PATRICK 222 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
001-280-015-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $ DEMEO MARK JAMES III 36 W BROOKSIDE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 001-280-016-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $ BELLOTTI JOHN & BELLOTTI BOBBIE JO 34 W BROOKSIDE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 001-280-017-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $ BARAJAS RUDOLPH J 32 W BROOKSIDE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 001-280-018-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $ ANTON CLAUDIU & ANTON MAHAILA LEIGH 30 WEST BROOKSIDE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 001-280-019-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $ ANDERSON CONNIE 16 W BROOKSIDE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 001-280-020-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $ BETH JUSTIN S & LINO SOPHIA 14 W BROOKSIDE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 001-280-021-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $ HAGER JEAN MARIA & ROBERT 12 W BROOKSIDE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 001-280-022-000 0010 6 1.0 749.24 $ LOPEZ OSCAR AGUILAR ET AL PO BOX 485 GEYSERVILLE, CA 95441 001-280-023-000 0937 6 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE 124 N CLOVERDALE BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

THE COTTAGES
PHASE 1 115-310-001-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SULLIVAN PAUL ANTHONY & SULLIVAN SETINA 301 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDAL, CA 95425 115-310-002-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ LEE ROBERT P TR & JEAN K TR 303 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-003-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ PIAZZA WILLIAM J TR & PIAZZA JULIE F TR 305 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-004-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ DRADY KEVIN & DRADY JULIE 307 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-005-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BESSER JAYME 309 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-006-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

GLOECKNER MATTHEW A TR & GLOECKNER
CARIE L TR 331 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-310-007-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ DURAN JOHN DAVID TR 3709 DEAUVILLE PL SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 115-310-008-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ CHRIST FRANK SR TR & CHRIST THERESA TR 315 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-009-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BLISS RICHARD J 312 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-010-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SYCHOWSKI RAYMOND R & SYCHOWSKI KC 310 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-011-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ JUSTMAN MICHELINE MAZZA TR 1098 SUFFOLK DR SANTA ROSA, CA 95401 115-310-012-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ TAYLOR JAMES S TR & TAYLOR MICHELLE E TR 306 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-013-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ OROZCO JOSE ANGEL 304 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-014-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WILLIAMS MITCHELL JR & WILLIAMS HEATHER 302 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-015-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BIRESCHI ANTHONY B & BIRESCHI NINA D 311 HOMEWOOD CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-016-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ STEWART GLORIA P ET AL 309 HOMEWOOD CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-017-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ VELDKAMP SCOTT A & VELDKAMP MARY ANNE 510 MARK WEST SPRINGS RD SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 115-310-018-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

MAGANA ERIKA ESMERALDA & REGE RANCE
AUSTIN 305 HOMEWOOD CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-310-019-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ W J LENHERR LLC
18733 HIDDEN VALLEY RD HIDDEN VALLEY LAKE, CA
95467
115-310-020-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ LYTLE WILLIAM & LYTLE VICTORIA ET AL 301 HOMEWOOD CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-021-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SHEEHY SUSAN L TR 300 HOMEWOOD CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-022-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WILLIAMSON JERRY A & CELESTE 302 HOMEWOOD CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-023-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ MORROW KATHLEEN L TR 498 SCHOOL ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-024-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ AHLBORN KATHERINE ELECE TR 306 HOMEWOOD CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-025-000 0010 3 1.0 $ 436.02 BERNAL ELIGIO & DEBERNAL SILVIA RODRIGUEZ 308 HOMEWOOD CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 25 5/29/2024 136

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
115-310-026-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

BROUGHTON GARRETT P TR & BROUGHTON
HELEN C TR 310 HOMEWOOD CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-310-027-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

GRANDY ALEXANDRA S & GRANDY ALEXANDRA S
TR 304 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-310-028-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ PEERY HAROLD & PEERY BONNIE 309 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-029-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

BLUCHER-NAMENY LAVONNE E TR & NAMENY
JAMES D TR 307 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-310-030-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ COLLINS KENNETH M 305 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-031-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

CANDELARIA DALE DEAN & CANDELARIA LORI
THORNTON 303 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-310-032-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ DRECKMAN G THOMAS & DURRETT MARGOT 301 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-310-033-000 0930 3 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE PO BOX 217 CLOVERDALE, CA 95422 115-320-001-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ COX ROBERT M & JEANNE R 1108 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-002-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

KOCH THOMAS MICHAEL TR & KOCH SHARON K
TR 1104 RANCH HOUSE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-320-003-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ MC FETRIDGE DAVID A & MC FETRIDGE DONNA L 302 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-004-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

GRANDY ALEXANDRA S & GRANDY ALEXANDRA S
TR 304 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-320-005-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

BROBERG DOUGLAS A TR & BLACK SUZANNE V
TR 306 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-320-006-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HAGE PAMELA S & DARRON B 308 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-007-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ GEORG BRIAN K TR & LEPE-GEORG MONICA TR 310 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-008-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HERMANN TERRY N & NEAT KAREN 312 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-009-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SCHWARTZ MARTHA M 314 COTTAGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-010-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WOLF TYSON 524 CARRIAGE CT SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 115-320-011-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

LE BLANC DEAN MICHAEL TR & LE BLANC
BARBARA R TR 303 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-320-012-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ RIZO YOLANDA 305 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-013-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BJORNSON JOHN JAMES & BLASI MICHELE L 307 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-014-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WILSON DANIEL J & WEHN LINDSEY A 309 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-015-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BARR DENYSE TR 311 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-016-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

HERNANDEZ JOEL & HERNANDEZ ESTHER MARIE
NAONG 313 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-320-017-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WONG JIMMY 315 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-018-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WHITE RICKY L & WHITE KATHERINE S 306 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-019-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ LILE EUGENE A TR & LILE POLLY J TR 308 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-020-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SCHANZER CHARLOTTE WATERS TR 8690 W DRY CREEK RD HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 115-320-021-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

UNDERHILL JAMES T TR & UNDERHILL CAROL F
TR 312 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-320-022-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HOLLIS JEFFREY & HOLLIS ANELA 314 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-023-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BESIO FRED PAUL & TREVIZO MARINA R 316 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-024-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WANKE DAVID S & WANKE SHERI 318 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-025-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WAGNER THOMAS & WAGNER ANN 320 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-026-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ VICKERS JAMES S & SHIPLEY JACLYN N 322 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-027-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ KROEZE BONNO VELDHUIS JR TR ET AL 324 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-028-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ FERRONATO JAMES TR & FERRONATO ROSE TR 326 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-029-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ PALLA JOSEPH J JR TR & PALLA LES ANN TR 328 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-030-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ FURBER ALAN M JR TR PO BOX 1384 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 115-320-031-000 0010 3 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE PO BOX 217 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-320-032-000 0010 3 0.0 $ - CITY OF CLOVERDALE PO BOX 217 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 26 5/29/2024 137

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
115-320-033-000 0010 3 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE PO BOX 217 CLOVERDALE, CA 95422

THE COTTAGES
PHASE 2 115-330-001-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ MULLER-STACH CLAUDIA 301 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-002-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SHANK RYAN & DAVISON HANNAH 303 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-003-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ GALLAGHER SHARON J TR 101 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-004-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BUCHIGNANI RICHARD P TR 307 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-005-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WILLIAMS GARY E & WILLIAMS KATHLEEN H 113 QUARTER HORSE LN BEULAVILLE, NC 28518 115-330-006-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BERG ALEX & BERG DEBRA 311 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-007-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ DIETZ DONNA R TR 313 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-008-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SERIO ANTHONY S TR & SERIO DOROTHY T TR 315 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-009-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WHEELER AMY & WHEELER BRIAN J 317 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-010-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HEMPHILL BRIAN J & HEMPHILL KELLY MICHELLE 319 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-011-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

MACDONALD DOUGLAS I TR & MACDONALD
LYNN M TR 321 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-330-012-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HORRALL BRADLEY C TR & HORRALL JANET C TR 323 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-013-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ YOUNG ADAH LOUISE TR ETAL 325 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-014-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ LENOX BENJAMIN TR & JENNY TR 327 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-015-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ MILLS LIANE MARIE TR PO BOX 1048 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-016-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

GLOECKNER MATTHEW A TR & GLOECKNER
CARIE L TR 331 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-330-017-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ LEWMAN GIB TR & SUSAN TR 3633 BURNSIDE RD SEBASTOPOL, CA 95472 115-330-018-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HENSLEY KYMBERLY TR 326 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-019-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HERNANDEZ JOSE R & DONNA L 324 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-020-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

CARSTENSEN ALLAN B TR & CARSTENSEN CATHY
J TR 322 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-330-021-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

TELDESCHI RAYMOND G TR & TELDESCHI LORI A
TR 4939 DRY CREEK RD HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
115-330-022-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WALL KASANDRA J TR & THOMAS M TR 318 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-023-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ PLATO CHARLENE & PLATO LEONARD JR 316 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-024-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ ANGELL MICHAEL D ET AL 312 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-025-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ MOOK JOHN H TR & MOOK CHERILYNN TR 310 BUCKEYE CIRCLE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-026-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ DOYLE PATRICK M JR 308 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-027-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ PARDINI LYNN & CARROLL ROBERT JOHN 306 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-028-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

OSTERMANN MATTHEW JACK TR & OSTERMANN
ELYCE MICHEL 304 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-330-029-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ CARRILLO DAVID JOSEPH & CARRILLO JULIA 302 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-030-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BAUER ROBERT ASHLEY & BAUER VIRGINIA A 309 LAUREL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-031-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ FISH KRISTIN L & FISH CHARLES T 311 LAUREL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-032-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ YOUNG DONALD J & YOUNG CAROL S 316 LAUREL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-033-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ KATZ ROSALIND N TR ET AL 314 LAUREL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-034-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

SARASY BRIAN P & SARASY GRAHAM POWELL TR
ET AL
5577 SKYLANE BLVD MAILBOX 4A SANTA ROSA, CA
95403
115-330-035-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SANCHEZ JORGE TR & SANCHEZ MARIA ELENA TR 310 LAUREL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-036-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HEINTZ STANLEY TR & HEINTZ PAULA RAE TR 308 LAUREL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-037-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ REYNOLDS LARRY R & REYNOLDS JOAN K 306 LAUREL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-038-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ LAROSA WILLIAM E & LAROSA KAYLA MORA 304 LAUREL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-039-000 0010 3 1.0 $ 436.02 VAZZOLER NICOLE 302 LAUREL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 27 5/29/2024 138

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
115-330-040-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

WETZEL HARRY H IV TR & WETZEL REBECCA ANN
TR 8644 HIGHWAY 128 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
115-330-041-000 0051 3 1.0 436.02 $ BUNKER FREDERICK L & BUNKER RAYNA L 303 LAUREL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-042-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WONG ROBERT CHEONG TR & WONG KAREN TR 1214 18TH AVE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94122 115-330-043-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ VALENCIA MOLLY MARIE 307 LAUREL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-044-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ FINK ALAN M & VON RECHENDORFF BRITA 303 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-045-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HISELER BETH MARIE 305 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-046-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

ADLER SUSAN TERRACINA TR & ADLER HOWARD
L TR 307 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-330-047-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ FURIA KELLY J TR 309 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-048-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ LARSEN KAREN M TR & KIRBY MARK E TR 311 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-049-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

GREGG ROBERT THOMAS JR & REMALEY AMBER
G 313 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-330-050-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HUGHES DON R TR & HUGHES CAROL R TR 315 BUCKEYE CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-051-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

HILDENBRAND DARREN J TR & HILDENBRAND
JONNA M TR 318 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-330-052-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

RHODES RICKEY ANDY TR & ORSOLINI-RHODES
VALERIE KA 316 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
115-330-053-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SENESTRARO JOHN G TR 1190 LOOP RD FORTUNA, CA 95540 115-330-054-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ ORR JACOB & CANDELARIA-ORR JENNY 312 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-055-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BAPTIST ALBERT & BAPTIST LUISA 310 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-056-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ KENNEY MARIA ET AL 308 PEPPERWOOD DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 115-330-057-000 0050 3 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE PO BOX 217 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

JEFFERSON

SPRINGS PHASE
3 116-450-001-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ GIBBS BRITTANY K & THOMSON KEVIN 217 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-004-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ FORNO MARCIA TORRES TR 550 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-005-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ COLE JOHN I & JULIE W 548 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-006-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ SPAIN TEDI & GUSTAFSON LETHA CHARLENE 546 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-007-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $

WOLTER AUGUSTINE A TR & WOLTER CYNTHIA J
TR 544 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-450-008-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ BERRY JULIE A TR & GIAMPAOLI MICHAEL P TR 542 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-009-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ CALDERON OSCAR A TR & CALDERON SUSAN TR 540 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-010-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ GASSER EDWARD J TR 538 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-011-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ PULIDO CRISTOBAL & PULIDO SILVIA RODRIGUEZ 536 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-012-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ HUTH COLE & NELSON MCKENZIE 534 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-013-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ REBOTTARO JOSEPH PO BOX 928 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-014-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $

ALEXANDER STEVEN TERRY JR & ALEXANDER
TANYA D 7024 EDINBURGH CT WINDSOR, CA 95492
116-450-015-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ KOOK CHRISTINE A 528 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-016-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $

WARNER CHARLES D TR & WARNER PATRICIA H
TR 547 W NORTH ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
116-450-017-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ WHEELER RICHARD & BONNIE PO BOX 373 FORESTVILLE, CA 95436 116-450-018-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ LEVIE MARGARET E & LEVIE ERROLL SCOTT 522 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-019-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ CUNNINGHAM JOSEPH M TR 331 E AGUA CALIENTE RD SONOMA, CA 95476 116-450-020-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ ESPINOZA MARIO TR & ESPINOZA FRANCISCA TR 518 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-021-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ WASSALL MICHAEL G & WASSALL EDITH E 516 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-022-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ MITCHELL PATRICIA J 514 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-023-000 0010 1 1.0 $ 258.56 GRAVLEY VICTOR & GRAVLEY THEREASA 513 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 28 5/29/2024 139

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
116-450-024-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ DALTON STEVEN ANTHONY EST OF 515 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-025-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ COOKE DIANE S TR 1457 HILL RD GLEN ELLEN, CA 95442 116-450-026-000 0001 1 1.0 258.56 $

GONZALEZ LUIS TR & BREEDLOVE-GONZALEZ
LINDA TR 519 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-450-027-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ SUAREZ FRANCISCA & SUAREZ RICARDO 521 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-028-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $

MCCLUSKEY MATHEW S TR & ROBISON RACHEL
A TR 3525 KENDELL HILL DR SANTA ROSA, CA 95404
116-450-029-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $

ZMRZEL ZACKARY & KIJAK TAYLOR & ZMRZEL
DAVID 525 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-450-030-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ GONZALEZ FERNANDO & MARIA E 527 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-031-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ OLSEN ANGELA & OLSEN JERROD 529 VENEZIA WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-450-032-000 0080 1 0.0 - $ CLOVER CREEK LLC
2650 CAMERON PARK DR STE 260 CAMERON PARK, CA
95682
116-450-033-000 0080 1 0.0 - $ CLOVER CREEK LLC
2650 CAMERON PARK DR STE 260 CAMERON PARK, CA
95682
116-450-034-000 0080 1 0.0 - $ CLOVER CREEK LLC
2650 CAMERON PARK DR STE 260 CAMERON PARK, CA
95682
116-450-035-000 0080 1 0.0 - $ CLOVER CREEK LLC
2650 CAMERON PARK DR STE 260 CAMERON PARK, CA
95682
116-450-036-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ VINCENT CHRISTINE 219 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

JEFFERSON

SPRINGS PHASE
4 116-490-001-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ WALKER GLORIA JOAN 301 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-002-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ CADLE CORY 303 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-003-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ CANTAYRE BERNARD Y & CANTAYRE BEAU D PO BOX 391 MIDDLETOWN, CA 95461 116-490-004-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ COSTA PHILIP & COSTA ELIZABETH 307 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-005-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ IMSDAHL PATRICIA K TR & IMSDAHL PHILLIP V TR 309 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-006-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $

GORTON WILLIAM K TR & GORTON CYNTHIA N
TR 41009 RIVER RD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-490-007-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ KLAUSCH RYAN & FIORI OLIVIA 313 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-008-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ LENHERR WAYNE TR
18733 HIDDEN VALLEY RD HIDDEN VALLEY LAKE, CA
95467
116-490-009-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ CORDELL JAMIE & CORDELL BILLY 317 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-010-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ WINTERBOTTOM MICHELE P TR 323 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-011-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ LAROSA PATRICIA ELLEN 324 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-012-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ ORTIZ STELLA 322 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-013-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ LADD BILLIE PO BOX 1863 SEBASTOPOL, CA 95473 116-490-014-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ DAVIS SHIRLEY M TR 318 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-015-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ GLASER DONNA MAE TR & GLASER GEORGE TR 316 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-016-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ ALEXANDER TERRY 7024 EDINBURGH CT WINDSOR, CA 95492 116-490-017-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ BOYLES JACK 318 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-018-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ POLISH MOCCASINS LLC 314 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-019-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ NEUSTADT DANIEL L TR & NEUSTADT MARY A TR 314 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-020-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ GLADDEN RYAN & GLADDEN HEATHER 312 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-021-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ JUAREZ ROGELIO MARIN 310 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-022-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ WAYSIDE GARDENS MOBILE HOME PARK GP 2425 DUNAWAY DR SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 116-490-023-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ FOWLER DAVID 306 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-026-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ MC DONALD CHARLES L & BARBARA G TR 300 MILAN CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-027-000 0010 1 1.0 $ 258.56

BORDESSA ANDREW E TR & BORDESSA CARTER R
TR 2273 CHANCERY CT SANTA ROSA, CA 95403
F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 29 5/29/2024 140

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
116-490-028-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $

MENDEZ JUAN BERNARDO MEDINA & PIMENTEL
ROGELIO MED 317 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-490-029-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ CODDING G DAVID TR PO BOX 9128 SANTA ROSA, CA 95405 116-490-030-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ SHERPA JANGBU TR & PUTI TR 313 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-031-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ STIPE CHASE 311 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-032-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ LUNA URSULA 309 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-033-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ ANDERSON HILDA & PASCHAL MARK 164 ELMIRA ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124 116-490-034-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $

MC DONALD CHARLES L TR & MC DONALD
BARBARA G TR 300 MILAN CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-490-035-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ LOPEZ ELVIA NOEMI TORRES 303 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-036-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ AQUILA ANGELA MARIE TR 301 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-037-000 0000 1 0.5 129.28 $ GUEST GARY T & GUEST NINETTE E 321 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-038-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ GUEST GARY T & GUEST NINETTE E 321 PORTOFINO WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-039-000 0937 1 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE 124 N CLOVERDALE BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-040-000 0937 1 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE 124 N CLOVERDALE BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-041-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ WELLS RICHARD & WELLS KAREN J 304 TOSCANA CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-490-042-000 0010 1 1.0 258.56 $ SPINGLER MELISSA L 302 MILAN CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

VINTAGE

MEADOWS
PHASE 1 116-500-001-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MORALES EDWARD M 315 PINOT WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-002-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BERRY RICHARD D ET AL PO BOX 232 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-003-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

DURAN VICTOR MANUEL GONZALEZ &
GONZALEZ LORENA 431 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-500-004-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GUTIERREZ RAUL & ELDA 435 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-005-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BELL RACHEL M 439 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-006-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MILLER NATHANIAL S PO BOX 4684 PASO ROBLES, CA 93447 116-500-007-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SALDANA ELOY & ARCELIA 316 CABERNET ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-008-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ CHERRY ANGELIKA & CURTIS 315 CABERNET ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-009-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ CASTRO VERONICA YASMIN 311 CABERNET ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-010-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ KLEIN SHAWNA 443 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-011-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BANDUCCI AMADEO TR 1820 SHORELINE HWY MUIR BEACH, CA 94965 116-500-012-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SCOTT JOHN M & SCOTT JUDITH T 451 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-013-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

MCCHESNEY DAVID G TR & MCCHESNEY
BEVERLEY J TR 312 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-500-014-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ PEREZ VICENTE MORENO & PEREZ MARIA E 316 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-015-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SCHWEIKL SCOTT & SCHWEIKL MISHEL 462 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-016-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

FERNANDEZ CASIMIRO BELTRAN & REYES SILVIA
DOLORES 458 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-500-017-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ NEAT VIRGINIA C TR 125 ALLAN AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-018-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HESTER JONATHAN JAMES & HESTER SJARINA J 450 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-019-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ CALVO CLYDE F 446 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-020-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ FOULKE KEVIN W 442 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-021-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SANCHEZ ANDREA TR & SANCHEZ LEONEL TR 438 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-022-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ AMMIRATI JULIE & AMMIRATI PHILIP 434 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-023-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ AGUILAR JUAN PO BOX 665 GEYSERVILLE, CA 95441 116-500-024-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ PLATT DAVID TR & PLATT DEBORAH K TR 204 GEYSERS RD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-025-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ WOOD ROBERT S TR 441 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-026-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ PODESTA EUGENE L TR & CAROL E TR 445 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-027-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MONDRAGON JUVENTINO & MARIA G 449 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-028-000 0010 2 1.0 $ 252.02 PESCE NATALIE & LEWIS ZACHARY 453 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 30 5/29/2024 141

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
116-500-029-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ TAYLOR ROBERT L & TAYLOR MELANIE TR 457 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-030-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

YEAGER KIMBERLY CHERIE & YEAGER KYLE
CHRISTOPHER 461 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-500-031-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GEIGER PAMELA H 251 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-032-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SEEL KURT ERIC 255 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-033-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ TUSI THOMAS M & TUSI TARA J 259 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-034-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ REECE PATRICK E & REECE MONTSERRAT 474 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-035-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GRENINGER JARED & MITCHELL KYLIE P 478 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-036-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HANES LESLIE TR PO BOX 640 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-037-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ OCANA JACQUELYNNE TR PO BOX 14100 SANTA ROSA, CA 95402 116-500-038-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ ELLIOTT CAROL K TR & HARLAND R TR 477 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-039-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SUAREZ BENJAMIN & SUAREZ GUILLERMINA 1844 PALISADES DR SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 116-500-040-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ LEITZ ERIC & LEITZ DAWN 482 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-041-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

RAMIREZ JAMIE GODINEZ & GODINEZ MARIA C
ET AL 478 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-500-042-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BARTON NORMAN TR & VIVIAN TR ET AL 5010 SKELLIG ROCK WAY EL DORADO HILLS, CA 95762 116-500-043-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BEAUDRY SASHA NOEL & JAMES TRAVIS WILLIAM 470 MUCSAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-044-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MORRISSEY JANICE I 466 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-045-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ THOMPSON CODY & THOMPSON SARAH 462 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-046-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ ELLIS MATTHEW 458 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-047-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ TONINATO MICHAEL & MCCREADIE LYDIA 454 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-048-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HORGAN THOMAS O TR & HORGAN IRENE D TR 414 MERLOT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-049-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MARQUEZ ANDRES & AZIZKHANIAN MARI 447 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-050-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ KRALKA DIANAH ET AL 451 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-051-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ WHITEHEAD ROBERT L PO BOX 215 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-052-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ DAVIS-KU ALISSA & KU BEN 459 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-053-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ LAWLER JENNIFER A 463 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-054-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GERHART DAVID E & LEWIS FOROUZAN 467 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-055-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ CARUSO SALVATORE JR TR 2604 5TH AVE UNIT 203 SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 116-500-056-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ REESE JOHN M TR & REESE LINDA C TR 440 CENTER ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 116-500-057-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ EAGAN DONALD W TR & EAGAN DONALD W TR 14734 YOUNG RD HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 116-500-058-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MENDOZA JOHN R ET AL 464 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-059-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

FLORES SALVADOR CARRILLO & CARRILLO MARIA
GUADALUP 460 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-500-060-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ WILSON GEORGE C & WILSON VIRGINIA A PO BOX 757 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-061-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ CURIEL FLORENTINO G JR & DELFINA 452 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-062-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ WARD CHRISTOPHER S & WARD HEATHER A 448 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-063-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ DELAGNES ANDRE & DELAGNES LUCIA 444 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-064-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GALLAGHER SHARON J TR 101 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-065-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MAHON FRANCIS P TR & MAHON ANN R TR 436 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-066-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MC DONALD WENDIE GENE ET AL 432 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-067-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ WILMS SCOTT CARL ET AL 1660 AETNA SPRINGS LN POPE VALLEY, CA 94567 116-500-068-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HERRERA LEONEL MEDINA & MEDINA PATRICIA 435 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-069-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ WILSON REX E & WILSON SALLY I 439 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-070-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ WATTS GLENDA J TR & WATTS DONALD L TR 443 GAMAY DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-071-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ ORSOLINI MARIO L TR & PAMELA S TR 446 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-072-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MEYERS JOHN P TR & MARILYN L TR 442 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-073-000 0010 2 1.0 $ 252.02 NUNGESTER ROBERT B & AMY 19965 PRICE AVE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 31 5/29/2024 142

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
116-500-074-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ COLLARD KEITH & COLLARD JOANNE 434 MUSCAT DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-500-075-000 0010 2 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE PO BOX 488 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

VINTAGE

MEADOWS
PHASE 3 116-510-001-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ TAMAYO LAURA 401 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-002-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SMITH HELEN E TR & SMITH JEFFREY T TR 405 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-003-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ DOGALI KATHRYN R TR 409 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-004-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

ARELLANES ANTONIO PEREZ & VIRUEL
ELIZABETH CHAVEZ PO BOX 2044 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
116-510-005-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ QUEZADA ISMAEL 417 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-006-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BASS RICHARD T JR TR 421 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-007-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

BERRY GINA SIMONE TR & BERRY JAMES HARVEY
TR 425 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-008-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SAUDER KEVIN & SAUDER LAUREN 429 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-009-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ COMO RONALD & COMO JUNE 433 RIESLING CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-010-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ TIMMS RONALD G & TIMMS PAMELA S 437 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-011-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ LOVETT MARK S TR & LOVETT ERIKA B TR 441 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-012-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HARPER AARON S & HARPER NATALIE F 445 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-013-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ ANGELI NICHOLAS TR & ANGELI JAMIE TR 449 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-014-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HOUCK CARL V & HOUCK SANDY 453 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-015-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BRASHEARS RYAN & BRASHEARS ASHLEY 457 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-016-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

OJEDA ARNULFO LUNA TR & CHAVEZ
CONSOLACION 461 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-017-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BUCKLEY KIERAN & JOHNSON JULIE E 465 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-018-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

VAILLETTE BONNIE F TR & VAILLETTE ROBERT J
TR 2375 RANGE AVE UNIT 31 SANTA ROSA, CA 95403
116-510-019-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ DAVIS HILARY ANNE & STRAUSS TED NATHAN 473 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-020-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

MOTA AGUSTIN EDUARDO TR & MOTA
MEREDITH LAINE JUST PO BOX 1676 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
116-510-021-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ CAMARA DENNIS & CAMARA SUZETTE J 451 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-022-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ LARSON VIRGINIA L TR 455 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-023-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HERNANDEZ SARAH A 459 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-024-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ DAVIS DENNIS & DAVIS CATHARINE L 478 S FOOTHILL BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-025-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ RIOS KATHRYN ANDREA TR 480 S FOOTHILL BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-026-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

GABRIEL STACEY & ARTEAGA JOSE DE JESUS
DAMIAN 482 S FOOTHILL BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-027-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GARCIA JESUS & ARTEAGA BRENDA J DAMIAN 484 S FOOTHILL BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-028-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ ALBRIGHT MARY J TR 621 SEXTON RD SEBASTOPOL, CA 95472 116-510-029-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

GUILLEN ROBERTO PERDOMO & VALDESPINO
ADRIANA DIANE 100 SYRAH CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-030-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ TCHOLAKOV MIROSLAV I & FISHER MARY A 102 SYRAH CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-031-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BALDWIN LYNDA TR 6582 BRIDGEWOOD DR SANTA ROSA, CA 95409 116-510-032-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ COOK ROBERT P & CHAU HUONG D 106 SYRAH CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-033-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MARQUEZ ROSE J TR 36 SANTA ELENA AVE DALY CITY, CA 94015 116-510-034-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HOOVER GORDON C & STEPHANIE L 110 SYRAH CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-035-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BUNCH DENNIE L TR & BUNCH ROWINA L TR 112 SYRAH CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-036-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ STOCKTON WILLIAM G & STOCKTON BEVERLY S 107 SYRAH CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-037-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HAGEN CARMEN J ET AL 105 SYRAH CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-038-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ AVANSINO PETER B & AVANSINO SARAH 103 SYRAH CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-039-000 0010 2 1.0 $ 252.02 PFAFF DUSTIN & PFAFF COURTNEY 101 SYRAH CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 32 5/29/2024 143

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
116-510-040-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MEADOR TODD & MEADOR LISA 410 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-041-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GREISH JAMES P TR & GREISH DEBORAH E TR 414 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-042-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BARNHISEL TRISHA 418 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-043-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

LECAMUS RUDY LYNN TR & LECAMUS RENEE LEE
TR 422 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-044-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ LAMBERT WILLIAM J TR 100 LAVENDER CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-045-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ NAGY ROBERT J & MARGARET M 102 LAVENDER CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-046-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ ELSTER DUSTIN S & ELSTER NIKKI L 104 LAVENDER CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-047-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BIRD TOBIAS J & BIRD NICOLE E 103 LAVENDER CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-048-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

CHEN CHRISTOPHER CODY LEE & ANDREWS
HELEN MARIE 101 LAVENDER CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-049-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

GARCIA MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ & DE RODRIGUEZ
MARIBEL ORT 430 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-050-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ FAYTER JASON W & FAYTER BARBARA T 434 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-051-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ TEFFT KATE 438 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-052-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BOTELLO JOSE C & RAMIREZ HORTENCIA L PO BOX 1278 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 116-510-053-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BENGE STEWART 446 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-054-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

GARRISON JACQUE CAROL & GARRISON JESSE
THOMAS PO BOX 1120 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-055-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ NAVARA MICHAEL O TR & NAVARA JANET A TR PO BOX 1164 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-056-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HARLAN KENNETH LEE 458 RIELSING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-057-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ PAVELKA RONALD G TR & PAVELKA JANE K TR 462 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-058-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ AYLOR RICHARD TR & AYLOR LINDA TR 443 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-059-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ PRIGMORE DARLENE S TR 439 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-060-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ DUPREEZ RONALD H 247 ALEXANDRIA DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 116-510-061-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

HEIDEBRINK KRISTOFER S & HEIDEBRINK
LORRAINE 401 CABERNET ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-062-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HYER ANDREW R & HYER SOPHIA G 405 CABERNET ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-063-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ ALEXANDER DAVID & ALEXANDER STEPHANIE 406 CABERNET ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-064-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ JAUREQUI JUAN A TR & JAUREQUI VERONICA TR 402 CABERNET ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-065-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

LANDS TODD RANDEL TR & LANDS STACY LYNN
TR 431 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-066-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ LANDS GINGER D 427 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-067-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GLASSON TIMOTHY C & GLASSON DARNELL S 423 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-068-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MICHELI EDWARD TR & MICHELI FRANCES TR 120 RIVER RD DAYTON, NV 89403 116-510-069-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SUTTON JOHN M & CYMERYS ANN M 415 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-070-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BLACKWELL LEROY HEATH & BLACKWELL KATIE A 411 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-071-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ QUINN JAMES E TR 542 LIGHTHOUSE AVE #202 PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950 116-510-072-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

WOLGAMUTH ROBERT SCOTT & CORRON
SHARON A 403 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-073-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SOTO ANTONIO 402 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-074-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

DIETERLE MICHAEL JOSEPH TR & DIETERLE LINDA
DENISE 406 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-075-000 0010 2 1.0 $ 252.02

WEDGE RICHARD W TR & WEDGE ADRIENNE M
TR 410 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 33 5/29/2024 144

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
116-510-076-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

HAMMOND REX ALLAN TR & HAMMOND LORI
MARIE TR 414 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-510-077-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ RIGBY LAURA WILLIAMS TR 418 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-078-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SHOUSE ROSEMARIE TR 422 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-079-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ RAMAZZOTTI ANTHONY & MILLS SHANNON 426 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-080-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SKINNER DOUGLAS A TR & SKINNER WENDY TR 430 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-081-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ CHESTERS JANINE L 434 HEALDSBURG AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-082-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ JONES THOMAS RODNEY TR 1410 NEOTOMAS AVE STE 104 SANTA ROSA, CA 95405 116-510-083-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MOORE STEVE & KIM 320 RIESLING ST CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-084-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MILLER NATHANIEL D & MILLER LINDSEY N 481 SOUTH FOOTHILL BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-085-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ FRANCE CHRISTINE TR 483 S FOOTHILL BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-086-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ JUAREZ GERARDO & JUAREZ NANCY 485 S FOOTHILL BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-087-000 0933 2 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE PO BOX 217 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-510-088-000 0933 2 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE PO BOX 217 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

THE COTTAGES
PHASE 3 116-520-001-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ QUILICI MICHAEL J TR & QUILICI JANICE E TR PO BOX 856 WINDSOR, CA 95492 116-520-002-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ TURNER KEN JR & LACEFIELD LORIE 117 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-003-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ FONSEN STANLEY D TR & MARTHA ANNE TR PO BOX 499 POTTER VALLEY, CA 95469 116-520-004-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ FINLEY DEBRA & MORRIS LYDIA TR 113 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-005-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ MEZZACAPA ANTHONY & MEZZACAPA AMANDA 111 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-006-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ REYNARD KERRY L TR 109 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-007-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ DEBENEDETTI GABRIELA 107 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-008-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ OBRIEN KELLY & OBRIEN EMILY 105 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-009-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

GARDNER JOCELYN CAMILLE TR & GARDNER
JACK ALLEN TR 13151 OCCIDENTAL RD SEBASTOPOL, CA 95472
116-520-010-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SANTERO NANCY C TR 2220 WESTERN AVE PETALUMA, CA 94952 116-520-011-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ LAPANT JANICE L TR 26499 DUTCHER CREEK RD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-012-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ NEWTON TODD & NEWTON TESSIE 102 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-013-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SCALA MICHELLE TR 104 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-014-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ NEWHALL AMANDA 106 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-015-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ TODD DEE J TR & TODD DENISE H TR 108 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-016-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WYMORE ELIZABETH ANN ET AL 741 CHENERY ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131 116-520-017-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ STEEL BARBARA TR 112 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-018-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ LONG ERNEST TR & DOROTHEA M TR 114 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-019-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ GUZMAN RUBEN & MARIA 116 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-020-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ STOCKTON DAVID L TR & STOCKTON SUSAN TR 118 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-021-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ DOYLE LINDA M 120 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-022-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

HAMILTON RICHARD A TR & HAMILTON VALERIE
P TR 122 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-520-023-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ GREGG ELAINE ANN TR 124 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-024-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ EMM ENDEAVORS LLC 1204 MITCHELL LN WINDSOR, CA 95492 116-520-025-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ COOK RAYMOND & COOK KELLEY 128 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-026-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ MOFFETT RAQUEL TR & MOFFETT BRADEN J TR 130 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-027-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ KOCH DANNY DEE & KOCH TRACY LEE 132 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-028-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ CHINN JASON P & KAREN B 134 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-029-000 0010 3 1.0 $ 436.02 PALLA ROBERT J 136 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 34 5/29/2024 145

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
116-520-030-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ CLAYTON BRIAN H TR & CLAYTON HEATHER L TR PO BOX 420 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-031-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ QUINN ADAM & PATIL ANUPAMA 101 HONEYSUCKLE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-032-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ WHITE KATHERINE S & WHITE RICKY L 306 ELBRIDGE AVE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-033-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ PETERSEN JACOB D & CAVE LEAH M 105 HONEYSUCKLE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-034-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ DIPPE JENNIFER M TR 107 HONEYSUCKLE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-035-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HENLEY ALAN J & DOWLING SUMMER D 109 HONEYSUCKLE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-036-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ GOODACRE GUY MICHAEL TR 106 HONEYSUCKLE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-037-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ RIDGWAY BLAKE RICHARD TR ET AL 648 SUMMERTREE LN SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 116-520-038-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BRANDT DAVID G TR & BRANDT JULIE L TR 102 HONEYSUCKLE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-039-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ PIGONI MICHAEL R TR & PIGONI CAROL E TR 533 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-040-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ VEGA ALEXANDER & ROXANNE 127 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-041-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ DEMERS JEFFREY M & DEMERS NORMA L 125 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-042-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ FERNANDEZ JESUS JR & FLORES MONICA F 113 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-043-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ TIFF ERIC 111 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-044-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ ADAMS PATRICIA A TR 109 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-045-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

FLEMING RAYMOND LANGDON JR TR & FLEMING
SHEILA RAE 107 DOUGLAS FIR CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-520-046-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ MCGINNIS SHERI S 100 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-047-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HATCHER RUSSELL & HATCHER TANIA 102 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-048-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ OERLEMANS CAROLA EST OF ET AL 104 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-049-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

OROZCO FERNANDO & OROZCO MARIA DE LOS
ANGELES CHAV 106 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-520-050-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

VRONOSKI BRENDA L TR & VRONOSKI MICHAEL
JR TR 108 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-520-051-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ PONZO KATHLEEN PO BOX 1394 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 116-520-052-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

PATTERSON MATTHEW G & PATTERSON
MICHELLE 112 PRIMROSE LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-520-053-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SHIDELER ROGER TR & SHIDELER KELSEY TR 26867 MOUNTAIN PINE RD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-054-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ RECH RYAN & RECH MEGHAN 100 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-055-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ HRUSKA CURTIS & HRUSKA AGNES 102 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-056-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ GALLAGHER SHARON J TR 101 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-057-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ KIM JIYOUNG 106 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-058-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ MATHISON WHITNEY & ABRAVAYA KANE BLAIR 108 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-059-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ RETHERFORD CHARLES & SANDRA 110 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-520-060-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ IMHAUS MELISSA JOAN TR 215 GROVE ST WINDSOR, CA 95492

IOLI RANCH
SUBDIVISION 116-530-001-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ ALVARADO-AVALOS JOSE L & ALVARADO JUANA PO BOX 749 REDWOOD VALLEY, CA 95470 116-530-002-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ SMITH LORI PO BOX 494 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-003-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ STEVENS EVONNE R 722 ORCHARD ST APT 4 SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 116-530-004-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ NUNEZ JUAN M RUIZ & RUIZ EUGENIA 106 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-005-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

DEGALVAN YOLANDA CARDENAS & GALVAN
SERGIO 110 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-006-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $
FIGUEROA-VALENCIA JORGE & FIGUEROAFIGUEROA IRMA 108 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-007-000 0019 5 1.0 95.70 $ BROWN SHAWN T & BROWN ERICA J 200 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-008-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ GONZALEZ MONICA 202 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-009-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ RAMIREZ AURELIO & RAMIREZ ELVIRA 204 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-010-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ ALCALA CHRISTIAN C & CAMPA GLORIA M 210 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-011-000 0010 5 1.0 $ 95.70 SORIANO JUAN & SORIANO BERTHA ET AL 212 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 35 5/29/2024 146

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
116-530-012-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ ALFREDO &
RODRIGUEZ JUANA HERN PO BOX 1203 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-013-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

OSEGUERA JAVIER CARDENAS & OSEGUERA
JOSEFINA S ET 29410 RIVER RD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-014-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

FRENCH ROSE KWANKAEW & HORPIBULSUK
WILAIRUX FRENCH 222 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-015-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ CARR ANN G ET AL 224 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-016-000 0019 5 1.0 95.70 $

DE LARA ARACELI NIETO & LOPEZ LEOPOLDO
LARA 216 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-017-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

CARDENAS CORNELIO GUERRERO & GUERRERO
LAURA MANZO 214 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-018-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

MARTINEZ-GARCIA IGNACIO & MARTINEZ MARIA
C 208 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-019-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

FIGUEROA-SANCHEZ ANTONIO & FIGUEROA
ALICIA GONZALE 13 CLARK AVE APT 1 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-020-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ CARMONA MARIO & GONZALEZ LILIA 211 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-021-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ NATIVIDAD HILDA V TR 209 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-022-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ RIOS MACARIO R & RIOS MARTHA O PO BOX 311 GEYSERVILLE, CA 95441 116-530-023-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ CALDERON VICENTE JR & SANCHEZ MARBELLA 311 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-024-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

ESPINOSA DIEGO CARDENAS & DE CARDENAS
IRMA CASTILL 301 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-025-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ LARA GRACIELA L ET AL 303 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-026-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ LARA LOPEZ DAGOBERTO & LARA LOPEZ MOISES 305 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-027-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ MANUEL & DEGONZALEZ
OLGA SANDOVA 307 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-028-000 0015 5 1.0 95.70 $ BONYEAU CONNOR & BROWSKI LUCA 207 LOLI RANCH RD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-029-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ USELTON SHADOW L & USELTON GAIL M 205 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-030-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

CORDOVA JESUS V & CORDOVA MARIA CARMEN
MADRIGAL DE 203 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-031-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

CONTRERAS OCTAVIO LOPEZ & ROSAS
STEPHANIE M LOPEZ 201 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-032-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ VAZQUEZ JOSE G & VEGA LETICIA 105 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-033-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ TORRES-AGUIRRE ANTONIO PO BOX 1488 WINDSOR, CA 95492 116-530-034-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

CARRASCO-VELERIO FRANCISCO & DE CARRASCO
EVA VIRUE 101 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-035-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

GUDINO MARISELA VASQUEZ & VASQUEZ VEGA
JOSE 107 IOLI RANCH RD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-530-036-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $ ABARCA ADRIAN ET AL 109 IOLI RANCH CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-530-037-000 0010 5 1.0 95.70 $

FIGUEROA-GARCIA CLEMENTE & DE FIGUEROA

JOSEFINA GU
480 S CLOVERDALE BLVD APT B CLOVERDALE, CA
95425
116-530-038-000 0080 5 0.0 - $ IOLI RANCH OWNERS ASSOCIATION 315 DIABLO RD STE 221 DANVILLE, CA 95391 116-530-039-000 0082 5 0.0 - $ IOLI RANCH OWNERS ASSOCIATION 315 DIABLO RD STE 221 DANVILLE, CA 95391 116-530-040-000 0082 5 0.0 - $ IOLI RANCH OWNERS ASSOCIATION 315 DIABLO RD STE 221 DANVILLE, CA 95391 116-530-041-000 0082 5 0.0 - $ IOLI RANCH OWNERS ASSOCIATION 315 DIABLO RD STE 221 DANVILLE, CA 95391 116-530-042-000 0082 5 0.0 - $ IOLI RANCH OWNERS ASSOCIATION 315 DIABLO RD STE 221 DANVILLE, CA 95391

THE COTTAGES
PHASE 4 116-540-001-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BROWN KRIEG A 114 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-540-002-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ GRELL SETH W & GRELL SARA M 116 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-540-003-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ RILEA RICHARD H & RILEA NICOLE M 118 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-540-004-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ EDIGER RUCHEL & EDIGER JASON 120 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-540-005-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ LERMAN EDITTE DALYA 122 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-540-006-000 0010 3 1.0 $ 436.02 SMITH RAYMOND E JR TR & SMITH ANNA M TR 124 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 36 5/29/2024 147

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
116-540-007-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ BRACCIALINI DANIEL R TR 123 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-540-008-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ PEARSALL TAMI DAINA TR 121 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-540-009-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ LAIRD CHARLES & LAIRD KARLA 119 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-540-010-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $

GOETZ BRUCE E JR TR & GOETZ MONICA MARIE
TR 117 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-540-011-000 0010 3 1.0 436.02 $ SMITH MICHELLE M & NATHAN J ET AL 115 GRAPE GABLES WAY CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

VINTAGE

MEADOWS
PHASE 2 116-550-001-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BRUNER STEVEN & BRUNER KELLY 500 PORT CIRCLE CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-002-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ NASHNER LEWIS M & FLORES ANN MARIE 504 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-003-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ FELICE JOHN S TR & FELICE KAREN A TR 100 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-004-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ VELLUTINI MICHAEL J TR PO BOX 1908 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 116-550-005-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ FRASER SCOTT & FRASER NICOLE 309 S FOOTHILL BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-006-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ LANGLOTZ KENNETH E & SUE E 108 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-007-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GRADY CAROLE J TR 112 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-008-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ KURPINSKY DENNIS T & KURPINSKY KRISTIN M 116 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-009-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

TUCKER SCOTT EDWARD & TUCKER NICHOLAS
ANNE 121 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-550-010-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MCNEIVE ADELINA STATEVA ET AL 117 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-011-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ CARLSON JESSE & CARLSON AUBREE ET AL 113 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-012-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ HOPWOOD DAVID B & HOPWOOD KIMBERLY D 109 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-013-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ STEVENSON DANE ERIC & DAVIS MIRIAM THAIS 105 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-014-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GALLAGHER SHARON J TR 101 ZINFANDEL CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-015-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ MINNIE MARK & MINNIE SHANNON 512 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-016-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ WALL JAMES D TR & WALL SHIRLEY A TR 516 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-017-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ LIND JEFFREY & LIND LAURA 218 WHITNEY ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131 116-550-018-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

HERSHWITZKY CHRISTOPHER J & HERSHWITZKY
CHERI L ET 528 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-550-019-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ THOMAS PHILIP TR & MILDRED TR 532 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-020-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ CASILLAS ALEJANDRO & CASILLAS AGNIESZKA 536 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-021-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ VASSAR ROBERT A TR & VASSAR MARDELLA TR 1123 S CLOVERDALE BLVD STE E #415 CLOVERDALE,
CA 95425
116-550-022-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ KOTNIK ANDREW JR TR & KOTNIK LYDIA LUCY TR 544 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-023-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GARLAND JOHN P & GARLAND CHRISTINE A 548 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-024-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ BEARDEN STEPHEN P 552 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-025-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SCOTT ROBERT B TR ET AL 556 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-026-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ SANTANA GERAD R & SANTANA JEANETTE M 560 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-027-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GLAZE TERRY L & DENISE A 564 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-028-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

BERTUCCELLI RUSSELL W TR & MENAPACE
JOANNE TR 568 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-550-029-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ COLLINS PHILLIP R & GAIL M 572 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-030-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

RODERICK JASON JAMES & RODERICK KATE
LINDSEY 573 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-550-031-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ FOLSOM TRUDIE B TR & FOLSOM STEVEN R TR 561 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-032-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ QUILICI MICHAEL J TR & JANICE E TR PO BOX 856 WINDSOR, CA 95492 116-550-033-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ REICHMUTH ROBERT & REICHMUTH CHRISTINE 553 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-034-000 0010 2 1.0 $ 252.02 BRASHEARS SUSAN 549 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 37 5/29/2024 148

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
116-550-035-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ DEIKE REBECKA & LUZ DENNIS 545 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-036-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ OPPERMAN BRIAN J & OPPERMAN DEBORAH 541 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-037-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ GEHRETT ANDY & DEANNA 537 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-038-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ PIGONI MICHAEL R TR & PIGONI CAROL E TR 533 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-039-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ AMBROSI JOSEPH J TR & AMBROSI LINDA J TR 529 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-040-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ LEE LAURA 525 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-041-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ AXELL BRANDON R & AXELL JULIE M 513 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-042-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

FERNANDEZ ADOLF D TR & FERNANDEZ SANDRA
S TR 509 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-550-043-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ DEVINE JOSEPH C & KAREN L 505 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-044-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $ LUBECK ROGER C TR & CHANDLER LYNETTE K TR 299 S FOOTHILL BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-550-045-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

CHAMBERLAIN ERIC JAMES & WIEDMAN JOSEPH
FRANCIS 295 S FOOTHILL BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-550-046-000 0010 2 1.0 252.02 $

BUCCHIANERI MICHAEL J & BUCCHIANERI SUSAN
M 291 S FOOTHILL BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-550-047-000 0010 2 0.0 - $ VINTAGE MEADOWS-CLOVERDALE LLC 204 CONCOURSE BLVD SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 116-550-048-000 0010 2 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE 124 N CLOVERDALE BLVD CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

THE VINEYARDS
AT CLOVERDALE 116-560-001-000 0019 4 1.0 455.28 $ TAPPIN CHEREE 102 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-002-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ SAHLIN NICOLE L 104 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-003-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $

SILVA JUAN CARLOS LOPEZ & MARTINEZ LETICIA
ET AL 106 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-560-004-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $

WILSON DOUGLAS C TR & WILSON MARIA GRACE
TR 626 BROWN ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
116-560-005-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ LOEB JOHN & HEBERT HEATHER 110 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-006-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $

MILLER NICHOLAS R TR & BRICKER-MILLER
KRISTEN TR 112 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-560-007-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ HERMSMEYER MARC 114 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-008-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ MOORE TINA 113 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-009-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $

MCNULTY JUSTIN JOSEPH TR & MCNULTY
SHERRIE LYNN TR 111 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-560-010-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ SPACEK JENNIFER 109 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-011-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ CURLE DEBORAH S TR 107 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-012-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ VADON TED 105 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-013-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ RAMIREZ JAIME & CERVANTES ANA I 103 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-014-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ ALVES JAMES S & ALVES RACHEL 101 SIERRA CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-015-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $

WHIPPLE JONATHAN L TR & AGNEW MARGARET
F TR 14601 POWERHOUSE RD POTTER VALLEY, CA 95469
116-560-016-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ MULLER JAMES R & LISA R 102 TIMBER RIDGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-017-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $

CONTRERAS JAIME MARTIN & ESKEW
SAVANNAH BREE 104 TIMBER RIDGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
116-560-018-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ ROYBAL STEPHEN A & ROYBAL AMANDA 106 TIMBER RIDGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-019-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ LEE MICHAEL V TR & LEE DONA LEE TR 30534 PUDDING CREEK RD FORT BRAGG, CA 95437 116-560-020-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ KAZARIAN CAMILLE D 110 TIMBER RIDGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-021-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ GONZALEZ ADAN ET AL 112 TIMBER RIDGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-022-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ GOMES JENNIFER TR & GOMES TONY TR 3661 ROAD J REDWOOD VALLEY, CA 95470 116-560-023-000 0010 4 1.0 $ 455.28 GREEN DOLPH D & MIER ELVIA OSNAYA 113 TIMBER RIDGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 38 5/29/2024 149

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
116-560-024-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ LOPEZ LETICIA & LOPEZ NIETO MIGUEL ANGEL 111 TIMBER RIDGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-025-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ LEONARD ERIN & LEONARD JAMES JR 109 TIMBER RIDGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-026-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ TEXEIRA ALAN B TR 107 TIMBER RIDGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-027-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ FORD JASON TR 3500 VERDE VISTA DR SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 116-560-028-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ NGUYEN ALEXANDER 103 TIMBER RIDGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 116-560-029-000 0010 4 1.0 455.28 $ BUCHIGNANI SHIRLEY ANN TR 101 TIMBER RIDGE CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

SUNRISE HILLS
PHASE 1 117-330-001-000 0023 7 2.0 126.88 $ BRUINGTON EUGENE 301 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-002-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ HENKEL BEVERLY B 303 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-003-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ EDDY SHAWNA M 305 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-004-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

MOSEBACH JEREMY D & SANCHEZ MARIA
PORTERO 307 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-330-005-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ ROBINSON MORGAN 309 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-006-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ MAY JAMES D TR & MAY DAWNELL A TR 311 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-007-000 0023 7 2.0 126.88 $ BATES DANA M & TURBEVILLE SEAN D 313 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-008-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ PINA LAWRENCE & PINA PATRICE 300 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-009-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ GHISLETTA MARIA F 302 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-010-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ LOWMAN MARY JUDITH 304 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-011-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

ARTEMOFF SVETLANA K TR & ARTEMOFF
GEORGE S TR 306 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-330-012-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ LOUIE JAMES & LOUIE MAIO YUN 1530 25TH AVE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94122 117-330-013-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ PERIMON DONNA F & PERIMON EDWIN L 310 SUNRISE DR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-014-000 0023 7 2.0 126.88 $ BRUINGTON EUGENE
8465 OLDREDWOOD HWY STE 410 WINDSOR, CA
95492
117-330-015-000 0023 7 2.0 126.88 $ VILLAVICENCIO GIOVANNI ET AL 325 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-016-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ ZARECKY GARY L TR & ZARECKY DIANE H TR 323 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-017-000 0023 7 2.0 126.88 $ LEYVA VERONICA 321 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-018-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ DURLER ROBERT H SR TR 319 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-019-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ GREGORY BERNADETTE & GREGORY JEFF 317 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-020-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

MORIKAWA STEVEN C TR & MORIKAWA DEBBIE
HART TR 315 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-330-021-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ CAITO NORMAN TR 313 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-022-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

PARKS DONNA ELNA TR & PARKS RONALD LEWIS
TR 311 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-330-023-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ FINCK MICHAEL J TR & FINCK TERESA ROSE TR 309 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-024-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ LINO LINO JR & LINO LAURA JEAN 307 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-025-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

CARDENAS GABRIEL & SANCHEZ-CARDENAS
EDITH 305 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-330-026-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ MORAS ARMAND N TR & MORAS PAMELA A TR 303 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-027-000 0023 7 2.0 126.88 $ GARCIA CONSULEO SANCHEZ ET AL 301 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-028-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ DANGELO CARMELO J & DANGELO TAMI 300 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-029-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ OCANA JACQUELYNNE TR PO BOX 14100 SANTA ROSA, CA 95402 117-330-030-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ BROOKS DAVID & BROOKS KATHY 304 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-031-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

BERTRAM WILLIAM E TR & BERTRAM DEBORAH
LYNN TR 6600 RIDGEWOOD RD WILLITS, CA 95490
117-330-032-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

MATHIAS TIMOTHY LYLE TR & MATHIAS WANDA
JEAN TR 3710 SCHERF LN UKIAH, CA 95482
117-330-033-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ LEWIS ANNIKA ET AL 310 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-034-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ BLIVEN ROSS A & BLIVEN ELLEN H 312 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-035-000 0010 7 1.0 $ 63.44 SLOAN JACQUELINE C 302 NORTHSTAR LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 39 5/29/2024 150

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR

SUBDIVISION
NAME
APN
USE
CODE
ZONE
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1

ASSESSMT
ZONE 2

ASSESSMT
ZONE 3

ASSESSMT
ZONE 4

ASSESSMT
ZONE 5

ASSESSMT
ZONE 6

ASSESSMT
ZONE 7

ASSESSMT

OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS
117-330-036-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ PATRICK JOHN W & DELILAH L 300 NORTHSTAR LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-037-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

MOORE-SANCHEZ COLLEEN L & SANCHEZ
ALFREDO 301 NORTHSTAR LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-330-038-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ PATEL CHAMPAKBHAI & PATEL SUDHABEN 495 BELTRAMI DR UKIAH, CA 95482 117-330-039-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

FLETCHER ROGER L II & FLETCHER MICHELLE Y
TR 305 NORTHSTAR LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-330-040-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ STEIS KYLE R & STEIS RACHELLE A 307 NORTHSTAR LN CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-041-000 0933 7 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE PO BOX 217 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-330-044-000 0933 7 0.0 - $ CITY OF CLOVERDALE PO BOX 217 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425

SUNRISE HILLS
PHASE 2 117-350-001-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

ROBERTSON DARYL CHRISTIAN & ROBERTSON
SHEA WESLIE 328 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-350-002-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

PALMER JEFFREY LYNN TR & PALMER SUSAN
JOAN TR 101 POLARIS CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-350-003-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ ROSE GLENN A & ROSE BUNNIE L 103 POLARIS CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-350-004-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ MENTH PAULA ANN & MENTH PETER MICHAEL 105 POLARIS CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-350-005-000 0001 7 0.5 31.72 $

MENTH PAULA ANN ET AL & MENTH PETER
MICHAEL 105 PLARIS CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-350-006-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

BALLESTRAZZE CHRISTIAN & MORGENLAENDER
SABINA MARI 109 POLARIS CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-350-007-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ CUPPLES CASEY J TR & CUPPLES KELSEY T TR 106 POLARIS CR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-350-008-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ PACINI DOROTHY J & PACINI KENNETH J 316 ROLLING HILLS AVE SAN MATEO, CA 94403 117-350-009-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ ASPEN GROVE PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 329 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-350-010-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ THOMPSON LYNNE L 101 ORION CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-350-011-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ BOYRIE MATTHEW K TR & BOYRIE WENDY A TR PO BOX 329 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-350-012-000 0001 7 0.5 31.72 $ BRIGGS AUGUST J TR & BRIGGS SALLY R TR 106 LAVENDER CIR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 117-350-013-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $

GUERRERO GERMAN HERRERA & SANCHEZ
GUERRERO LIZETH 104 ORION CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
117-350-014-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ LOPEZ DAISY RUVALCABA & LOPEZ JOEL 102 ORION CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-350-015-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ ASPEN GROVE PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 329 CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-350-016-000 0010 7 1.0 63.44 $ WOLCOTT ANDREA TR ET AL 324 MOONLIGHT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-350-017-000 0057 7 2.0 126.88 $ LARSON SARA J & PERSONS TIMOTHY M ET AL 107 ORION CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 117-350-018-000 0001 7 0.5 31.72 $ LARSON SARA J & PERSONS TIMOTHY M 107 ORION CT CLOVERDALE, CA 95425 ASSESSMENTS PER ZONE: $ 17,452.80 $ 51,916.12 $ 82,407.78 $ 13,203.12 $ 3,540.90 $ 10,489.36 $ 4,028.44 ESD UNITS PER ZONE: 67.5 206.0 189.0 29.0 37.0 14.0 63.5 F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\2024-Cloverdale-LLAD.xlsx 40 5/29/2024 151 41 PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
Special and General Benefits
Each parcel within each of the zones of the Assessment District receives a distinct special benefit from improvements and maintenance thereof as discussed below. Additionally, general benefits conferred to the community at large from improvements and maintenance thereof within each zone, if any, are identified.

Zone 1 - Zone 1 includes the maintenance of the landscaping and the pathway adjacent to the creek running through Jefferson Springs Subdivision, Phases 3 & 4. The parcels within this zone receive a direct special benefit from the pathway and creek. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 1 provided by the landscaping and the maintenance thereof include enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, and improved air quality from additional vegetation. The Zone 1 maintained landscaping is determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 1 provided by the pathway include the readily accessible opportunity for recreation and dog walking. Based upon City staff observations and discussions with residents, this pathway appears to be used predominantly by neighborhood residents and it is therefore assumed to confer no general benefits to the community at large.

Zone 2 - Zone 2 funds the annual costs associated with the operation and maintenance of Vintage Meadows Park, the back-on landscaping along portions of Foothill Boulevard and S. Franklin Street within the subdivision, the traffic island within Healdsburg Avenue and the area at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Port Circle, south of Zinfandel Court. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 2 provided by the landscaping and the maintenance thereof include enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, and improved air quality from additional vegetation. The Zone 2 maintained landscaping, excluding Vintage Meadows Park, is determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large.

Vintage Meadows Park General Benefit Analysis (within Zone 2) Vintage Meadows Park was built as a Neighborhood Park within the Vintage Meadows residential development and was intended to serve the residents of that neighborhood. Consequently, it has been the assumption since the park was completed in 2007 that it is used predominantly by the residents of that neighborhood (Zone 2). However, as an open public park, it is reasonable to assume that it is used, at least occasionally, by members of the community that reside outside of Zone 2. That usage would represent a general benefit to the community at large.

An analysis was conducted in 2018 to apportion the use of the park between residents of Zone 2 and the community at large. Based upon staff observations and a review of historical aerial photographs of the park, there are rarely any vehicles parked adjacent to the park. It is therefore assumed that the park is accessed mainly by pedestrians. This analysis looked at the total number 152
42 of residences within a reasonable walking distance of the park. An individual’s willingness to walk a certain distance depends of upon a variety of factors including purpose, age, health, safety and climate. For this analysis walking distance was assumed to be ¼ mile. The total number of residences within walking distance, excluding those that are closer to City Park, was determined to be 267. Of that total, 206 are within the Vintage Meadows development (Zone 2). Therefore, the percentage of residences within walking distance but not within Zone 2 is calculated to be 23%. Although household populations are not uniform in their composition and likelihood of using the park, this figure is believed to represent a reasonable estimate of the General Benefit that Vintage Meadows Park confers on the community outside of Zone 2. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 2 provided by Vintage Meadows Park include the readily accessible opportunity for recreation and enhanced desirability of properties through association with and proximity to the park.

The total estimated cost of maintaining Vintage Meadows Park, including the restrooms for FY 2024-25 is budgeted to be $32,682.22. The total funding contribution from the City’s General Fund will be $7,516.91. This represents 23% of the total budgeted park maintenance cost. This percentage of the total park operation and maintenance cost paid for by the City’s General Fund is equal to the estimated percentage of general benefit that the park confers to the community at large.

Zone 3 - The related Assessment District improvements in Zone 3 include the linear park along Muscat Creek, “back-on” landscape maintenance along a portion of Foothill Boulevard within Zone 3, maintenance of the preserved wetlands area at the corner of Ranch House Drive and Elbridge Drive, weed abatement of the area just west of Ranch House Drive and Elbridge Avenue and other improvements within Zone 3. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 3 provided by the landscaping and the maintenance thereof, the preserved wetlands and the weed abatement include enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, and improved air quality from additional vegetation. The weed abatement also provides the special benefit of reduced fire risk.

The Zone 3 maintained landscaping, preserved wetlands and weed abatement are determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 3 provided by the linear park include the readily accessible opportunity for recreation and dog walking. Based upon City staff observations and discussions with residents, this linear park appears to be used primarily by neighborhood residents and is therefore assumed to confer no general benefits to the community at large.

Zone 4 - The related improvements in Zone 4 include “back-on” landscaping along Foothill Boulevard and Mount Diablo Way and maintenance of a stormwater detention basin area within Zone 4. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 4 provided by the landscaping and the maintenance thereof include enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, and improved air quality from additional vegetation. The Zone 4 maintained landscaping is determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large. An additional special benefit of enhanced flood protection 153
43 is provided to each parcel in Zone 4 by the detention basin. The Zone 4 maintained detention basin is determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large.

Zone 5 - The related improvements in Zone 5 include “back on” landscaping along Cloverdale Boulevard. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 5 provided by the landscaping and the maintenance thereof include enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, and improved air quality from additional vegetation. The Zone 5 maintained landscaping is determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large.

Zone 6 - The related improvements in Zone 6 include the “back-on” landscape maintenance along a portion of Cloverdale Boulevard and West Brookside Drive and a small park on West Brookside Drive. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 6 provided by the landscaping and the maintenance thereof include enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, and improved air quality from additional vegetation. The Zone 6 maintained landscaping is determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 6 provided by the small park include the readily accessible opportunity for recreation. This park does not have any signage indicating that it is a public park and it could easily be assumed to be a private amenity.

Based upon this fact and City staff observations, this park is assumed be used exclusively by neighborhood residents and is therefore determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large.

Zone 7 - The improvements in Zone 7 include “back-on” landscape maintenance along a portion of Foothill Boulevard, maintenance of the open space and drainage easement (wetland) area and street lighting costs. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 7 provided by the landscaping and the maintenance thereof and the wetlands include enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, and improved air quality from additional vegetation. The Zone 7 maintained landscaping and wetlands are determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large. In addition, the open space includes a paved path that provides the special benefits to each parcel in Zone 7 of readily accessible opportunities for recreation and dog walking. Based upon City staff observations and discussions with residents, this path appears to be used primarily by neighborhood residents and is therefore determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large. The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 7 provided by the operation and maintenance the streetlighting is enhanced pedestrian and vehicle safety. The Zone 7 operated and maintained streetlights are determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large.

Method of Apportionment
The following is a brief description of the manner the annual assessment has been apportioned to each parcel in Zones 1 – 7 within the Assessment District. Only the proportionate special benefit costs of operation and maintenance of improvements within each Zone are apportioned to the assessments.
154
44 The method of apportionment (spread) equates all parcels in Zones 1 – 7 within the boundaries of the Assessment District to an Equivalent Single-Family Dwelling (ESD) unit use, or portion thereof. As shown in Table 3, basic use units reflect the relative benefit accruing to parcels of land within the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District.

Table 3. Use Units by Parcel Type
Parcel Type Use Units
Vacant parcel in undeveloped area 1/10 unit
Vacant parcel in developed area 1/2 unit
Single dwelling parcel 1 unit
Multiple dwelling unit parcel 1 unit per dwelling
Commercial or Industrial parcel 1 unit per business
Commercial or Industrial parcel with dwelling
unit
1 unit per business + 1 unit per dwelling unit
Once the total number of ESD units is determined for each of the Zones, the total number of ESD units within each Zone shall be divided into each respective Zone’s operation and maintenance expenses for the upcoming fiscal year (see Part B). This will result in the proposed annual assessment per ESD for the upcoming fiscal year. The annual assessment per ESD shall be multiplied by the total use units established for each parcel, or portion thereof, to determine the proposed total annual assessment for each parcel within each zone. Annual assessments are apportioned in this manner due to the relative benefit of the improvements to each of the parcels within each separate Zone. Since the improvements are easily accessible to all the parcels within each Zone, the level of benefit is equally spread to each parcel.

Although Section 22663 of the Streets and Highways Code typically requires that public property not be assessed, Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution now requires that public agencies shall not be exempt from assessment. However, the creek area, wetlands and public rights-of-way and easements within various Zones preclude construction of structures for other uses that conflict with the allowable zoning of these areas. Therefore, these publicly owned areas without a dwelling used exclusively for greenbelt, or open space, or upon the common area of any planned unit development receive no special benefit and do not receive an annual assessment.
155
45 PART E
FY 2024-25 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
The names and addresses of each of the property owners as shown on the County of Sonoma Assessor's Tax Assessment Roll have been keyed to the special assessment number (Assessor Parcel Number) as shown in Part C – Assessment Roll of this Engineer’s Report. 156
46 PART F
FY 2024-25 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Attached are the Assessment Diagrams (Maps) for the seven Zones within the Assessment District. The first Assessment Diagram is an overview map showing the locations of all seven Zones of the Assessment District. Please note the lines and dimensions of each parcel, as well as the distinctive Assessor’s Parcel Number, are shown on the Assessor's Maps for the City of Cloverdale available at the County of Sonoma Assessor's Office. The attached pages also provide the reference to the appropriate Assessor Books at the County of Sonoma Assessor’s Office for the respective subdivisions in each of the seven Zones. 157
47 Zone 1 – Jefferson Springs:

All the land lying within the Jefferson Springs Phase 3 Subdivision filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in book 565 of Maps, Pages 36-41.

All the land lying within the Jefferson Springs Phase 4 Subdivision filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in book 583 of Maps, Pages 42-48.

Zone 2 – Vintage Meadows:

All the land lying within the Vintage Meadows Subdivision, filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in book 599 of Maps, Pages 11-17.

All the land lying within the Vintage Meadows II Subdivision, filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in book 656 of Maps, Pages 48-54.

All the land lying within the Vintage Meadows III Subdivision, filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in book 636 of Maps, Pages 15-24.

Zone 3 – The Cottages:

All the land lying within The Cottages of Cloverdale Phase 1 Subdivision filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in book 614 of Maps, Pages 43-50.

All the land lying within The Cottages of Cloverdale Phase 2 Subdivision filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in book 633 of Maps, Pages 12-18.

All the land lying within The Cottages of Cloverdale Phase 3 Subdivision filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in book 640 of Maps, Pages 24-30.

All the land lying within The Cottages of Cloverdale Phase 4 Subdivision filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in book 655 of Maps, Pages 1-5.

Zone 4 – The Vineyards at Cloverdale:

All the land lying within Vineyards at Cloverdale Subdivision filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in Book 660 of Maps, Pages 18-21.

Zone 5 – Ioli Ranch:

All the land lying within the Ioli Ranch Subdivision filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in Book 645 of Maps, Pages 30-37.
158
48 Zone 6 – Brookside Terrace:

All the land lying within the Brookside Terrace Subdivision filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in Book 658 of Maps, Pages 11-14.

Zone 7 – Sunrise Hills:

All the land lying within the Sunrise Hills Subdivision filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in Book 663 of Maps, Pages 48-52.

All the land lying within the Sunrise Hills 2 Subdivision filed in the recorder’s office of the County of Sonoma in Book 701 of Maps, Pages 01-04.

F:\Projects\Cloverdale\LLAD\2024cllad 03-5180\24-C-Engr's Report - FFA.docx 159

JEFFERSON

SPRINGS
ZONE 1

VINTAGE

MEADOWS
ZONE 2

THE COTTAGES
ZONE 3

THE VINEYARDS AT

CLOVERDALE
ZONE 4

IOLI RANCH
ZONE 5

BROOKSIDE

TERRACE
ZONE 6

SUNRISE HILLS
ZONE 7 CLOVERDALE BLVD JEFFERSON STREET

SCHOOL ST

FIRST ST

ASTI RD

CITRUS FAIR
DR

CHERRY CRK RD
CLARK
AVE

CLOVERDALE BLVD
HIGHWAY 101

RAILROAD

FOOTHILL BLVD

SANDHOLM
COASTLAND | DCCM
1400 Neotomas Avenue
Santa Rosa, CA 95405707.571.8005 | coastlandcivil.com
160
COASTLAND | DCCM 1400 Neotomas Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95405 707.571.8005 | coastlandcivil.com 161
COASTLAND | DCCM 1400 Neotomas Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95405 707.571.8005 | coastlandcivil.com 162
COASTLAND | DCCM 1400 Neotomas Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95405 707.571.8005 | coastlandcivil.com 163
COASTLAND | DCCM 1400 Neotomas Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95405 707.571.8005 | coastlandcivil.com 164
COASTLAND | DCCM 1400 Neotomas Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95405 707.571.8005 | coastlandcivil.com 165
COASTLAND | DCCM 1400 Neotomas Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95405 707.571.8005 | coastlandcivil.com 166
COASTLAND | DCCM 1400 Neotomas Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95405 707.571.8005 | coastlandcivil.com 167
From:

Subject:

Date:

Melanie Bagby
Council Report 6/12-6/26
Wednesday, June 26, 2024 3:48:46 PM
6/14 Spoke at SMART pathway groundbreaking at Andy's Unity Park, Santa Rosa 6/17 Participated in SCTA survey call
6/18 SMART Executive and Board Meetings, Petaluma
6/20 Attended Cal Cities Transportation, Communications, and Public Works Policy Committee Meeting, via Zoom
6/21 Attended Sonoma County Mayors' & Councilmembers' Meeting, Healdsburg Best,
Melanie Bagby
Councilmember, City of Cloverdale
Voicemail (707) 893-7170 • [email protected]
168
June 19, 2024
The Honorable Diane Papan
Assemblymember, District 21
1021 O Street, Suite 4220
Sacramento, CA 94249-0021
Re: City of Cloverdale - Support for AB 1359
Dear Assemblymember Papan:

The City of Cloverdale is pleased to support AB 1359, forward-thinking legislation that will help our state achieve its ambitious climate goals on schedule.

Geothermal power has significant potential to help California meet our climate goals, especially at times (such as night or winter) when other renewables like solar and wind may be unavailable. Before development of a geothermal field can begin, the developer needs to drill exploratory wells to gather subsurface data to confirm project feasibility and inform design decisions. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the drilling of an exploratory well is treated as a separate project – with a separate environmental review process – from the broader geothermal field development, which makes sense as the initial exploratory well is much smaller in scale and impact.

Unfortunately, an outdated provision of state law specifying that the state Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) must serve as the lead agency under CEQA for geothermal exploration projects threatens to prevent advanced geothermal from taking off in California. The relevant provision of law – Public Resources Code §3715.5 – was originally put in place to accelerate geothermal development, but is now having the opposite effect, as CalGEM works under multi-year delays due to resource constraints associated with its role in oil and gas permitting. These delays put developers in the position of having to wait years before they can even explore whether a site is viable for geothermal development (let alone complete the project and start generating clean power). No other form of renewable energy operates under a similar requirement. This antiquated provision of state law threatens to derail new geothermal development in California before it can even begin.

Fortunately, counties already typically serve as the lead agency for larger, more complex geothermal field development projects and are fully capable of serving as the lead agency for geothermal exploration, as well. Deleting Public Resources Code §3715.5, as envisioned in AB 1359, will allow geothermal exploration projects to receive a lead agency under CEQA the same way any other project would, instead of slowing these projects down with an arbitrary, unique, and anachronistic requirement.

This proposal will NOT weaken CEQA or lower environmental standards. It will simply ensure that geothermal exploration wells go through the same CEQA process as other projects in the state.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Todd Lands
Mayor
c: Cloverdale City Council
169

Cloverdale City CouncilJune 26, 2024

Cloverdale City Council
June 26, 2024