Cloverdale City Council
January 22, 2025

City Council Meeting Minutes - January 22, 2025 - Page 1 of 5 124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707-894-2521
www.cloverdale.net

MINUTES - FINAL

REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND JOINT MEETING OF THE CLOVERDALE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2025
5:00 PM - CLOSED SESSION

CLOVERDALE CITY HALL
124 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
6:00 PM - OPEN SESSION

CLOVERDALE PERFORMING ART CENTER
209 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM

1. OPENING CLOSED SESSION

1.A Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 5 p.m.

1.B Roll Call

Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Morgenstern, Wolter

Absent: None.

1.C Closed Session Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions) None.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION AGENDA:

None.

3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION TO HEAR THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S):

3.A PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Manager
Item was received and filed.

City Council Meeting Minutes - January 22, 2025 - Page 2 of 5 OPEN SESSION - 6:00 PM
A. OPENING PUBLIC SESSION
A.1 Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.

A.2 Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Lands led the pledge of allegiance.

A.3 Roll Call

Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Morgenstern, Wolter

Absent: Councilmember Laskey
A.4. Report Out on Closed Session
None.

A.5 Conflict of Interest Declaration
None.

A.6 Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
None.

B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
B.1 Verbal Comments
La Reva Myles spoke regarding community policing and ICE Police Chief Parker provided comments.

B.2 Written Comments
• Cloverdale Rancheria - Macias
• Carbon Neutral by 2030 - Koslowsky
• Water and Fire Hydrant Infrastructure - Koslowsky
• Dog Park - Evans
C. PROCLAMATIONS
None.

D. STUDENT LIAISON REPORT
Liaison Gallego reported.

E. PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Lands rearranged the agenda to see item E.2 prior to E.1.

E.2 Employee Recognition:

Police Chief Parker reported.

New Personnel: Charity Koch
Promotion: Beau Gastinea
City Council Meeting Minutes - January 22, 2025 - Page 3 of 5 E.1 Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District Update City Manager Thompson introduced the item.

A Marin/Sonoma Mosquito and Vector Control representative presented and responded to Councilmember inquiries and comments.

F. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Lands pulled item F.2
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Wheeler, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive reading of the text and adopt the Consent Calendar items F.1, F.3, and F.4.

The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes (4): Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Morgenstern, Wolter No (0): None
Abstain (0): None
Absent (1): Councilmember Laskey
F.1 Consider Adoption of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving the Active Transportation Plan and finding this action is exempt from further environmental review under the General Rule in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines section 15061(b)(3).

ACTION: Resolution Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 002-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CLOVERDALE APPROVING THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND FINDING THIS

ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE GENERAL RULE IN CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3) F.3 Consider Appointing the Engineer of Record for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2025-26
RESOLUTION NO. 003-2025 ENTITELD: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CLOVERDALE APPOINTING COASTLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING TO SERVE AS THE ENGINEER

OF WORK FOR THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND DIRECTING THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 (PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972)
F.4 Consider Adoption of the 2025 City Council Subcommittee, Joint Subcommittee and Regional Board and Committee Appointments
ACTION: Resolution Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 004-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ADOPTING THE 2025 ROSTER OF SUBCOMMITTEE, JOINT COMMITTEE AND REGIONAL BOARD/COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS AND THE 2025 SUBCOMMITTEE

MEETING SCHEDULE
City Council Meeting Minutes - January 22, 2025 - Page 4 of 5 Mayor Lands returned to item F.2.

F.2 Consider Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Miracle PlaySystems for the Procurement and Installation of new playground equipment at Furber Park in amount of $269,244.56
Mayor Lands provided comments
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Wheeler, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive reading of the text and adopt:

RESOLUTION NO. 005-2025 ENTITELD: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING A PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH MIRACLE PLAY SYSTEMS IN THE AMOUNT OF $269,244.56 FOR THE

PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
The motion carried by the following vote:

Yes (4): Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Morgenstern, Wolter No (0): None
Abstain (0): None
Absent (1): Councilmember Laskey
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

H. NEW BUSINESS
H.1 Direction on establishment of Outside Service Agreement Clearwater Ranch City Manager Thompson introduced the item and Staff responded to Councilmember inquiries and comments.

Council provided Staff direction on drafting an Outside Service Agreement to provide water to Clearwater Ranch outside the City limits.

I. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
Subcommittee Agendas, Approved Minutes, and Media are available at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter.

J. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS, LETTERS OF SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
None.

K. CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None.

L. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Councilmember Wolter informed the Council of his intent to resign at the end of February, 2025.

Vice Mayor Wheeler provided comments on a potential Homelessness / Mental Health hub.

City Council Meeting Minutes - January 22, 2025 - Page 5 of 5 Mayor Lands addressed Councilmember Wolter’s comments, and Councilmember Wolter addressed the transition. Councilmember Morgenstern provided comments.

Mayor Lands provided comments on Measure DD Sales Tax collection.

M. COUNCIL DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.

N. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lands adjourned the meeting at 6:52 p.m. to the next regular meeting of the Cloverdale City Council scheduled for February 12, 2025.

APPROVED ON: April 9, 2025
________________________
Mike Maloney, City Clerk
124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707-894-2521
www.cloverdale.net
The Cloverdale City Council welcomes public interest, attendance, and in-person participation at meetings.

Open session meetings are held in-person at the Cloverdale Performing Art Center. You may also view the live streams online at www.zoom.us/join, by telephone: 1.669.900.6833, both using Meeting ID: 823 1668 4527, directly at https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82316684527 or on YouTube at cloverdale.net/youtube CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM

1. OPENING CLOSED SESSION

1.A Call to Order

1.B Roll Call

1.C Closed Session Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION AGENDA:

Prior to recessing to Closed Session, the Public may speak on Closed Session Items.

3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION TO HEAR THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S):

3.A PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Manager
AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND JOINT MEETING OF THE CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2025
5:00 PM - CLOSED SESSION

CLOVERDALE CITY HALL
124 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
6:00 PM - OPEN SESSION

CLOVERDALE PERFORMING ART CENTER
209 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
1 OPEN SESSION - 6:00 PM
A. OPENING PUBLIC SESSION
A.1 Call to Order
A.2 Pledge of Allegiance
A.3 Roll Call
A.4. Report Out on Closed Session
A.5 Conflict of Interest Declaration
A.6 Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
B.1 Verbal Comments
Any person wishing to speak in person on an item not listed on the agenda may do so at this time. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the City Council is not allowed to consider issues or take action on any item not listed on the agenda. Three minutes are allotted to each speaker.

B.2 Written Comments
Public written communications sent to Council on items not listed on the agenda may be discussed at this time. Written communications to be discussed will be listed below, if any.

C. PROCLAMATIONS
None.

D. STUDENT LIAISON REPORT
Liaison Saito or Liaison Gallego
E. PRESENTATIONS
E.1 Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District Update Recommended Action(s):

Receive Presentation
E.2 Employee Recognition:

New Personnel: Charity Koch
Promotion: Beau Gastineau
Cloverdale Rancheria - Macias
Carbon Neutral by 2030 - Koslowsky
Water and Fire Hydrant Infrastructure - Koslowsky
Dog Park - Evans
MSMVCD Presentation
2 F. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items under the Consent Calendar will be considered together by one acCon of the City Council unless any Councilmember or member of the public requests that an item be removed and considered separately.

F.1 Consider Adoption of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving the Active Transportation Plan and finding this action is exempt from further environmental review under the General Rule in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines section 15061(b)(3).

Recommended Action(s):

Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving the Active Transportation Plan and Finding this Action is Exempt from Further Environmental Review Under the General Rule in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061 (B) (3).”
F.2 Consider Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Miracle PlaySystems for the Procurement and Installation of new playground equipment at Furber Park in amount of $269,244.56
Recommended Action(s):

Adopt A Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City of Council of the City of Cloverdale approving a purchase agreement and minor construction agreement with Miracle Play Systems in the amount of $269,244.56 for the purchase and installation of playground equipment and authorizing the city manager to execute said agreement.”
F.3 Consider Appointing the Engineer of Record for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2025-26
Recommended Action(s):

Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale appointing Coastland Civil Engineering to serve as the Engineer of Work for the City of Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District and Directing the preparation and filing of the Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-26 (Pursuant To The Landscaping And Lighting Act Of 1972).” F.4 Consider Adoption of the 2025 City Council Subcommittee, Joint Subcommittee and Regional Board and Committee Appointments
Recommended Action(s):

Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Adopting the 2025 Roster of Subcommittee, Joint Committee and Regional Board/Committee Appointments and the 2025 Subcommittee Meeting Schedule.”
Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Exhibit A - Cloverdale ATP
Attachment 3 - Presentation
Late Correspondence - SCBC
Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Exhibit A - Cost Estimate and Plans
Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Exhibit A - Proposal
3 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

H. NEW BUSINESS
H.1 Direction on establishment of Outside Service Agreement Clearwater Ranch Recommended Action(s):

Provide Staff direction to drafting an Outside Service Agreement to provide water to Clearwater Ranch outside the City limits.

I. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
Subcommittee Agendas, Approved Minutes, and Media are available at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter.

J. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS, LETTERS OF SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
None.

K. CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
Staff may provide written and or verbal informational reports.

L. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Councilmembers may provide written and or verbal informational reports and updates on regional boards, committees, and community activities.

M. COUNCIL DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmembers may request agenda items for future Council and or Council Subcommittee meetings.

N. ADJOURNMENT
To the next regular meeting of the Cloverdale City Council scheduled for February 12, 2025.

IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Members of the public may provide comment on an agenda item in-person during the public comment periods. Commenters will have three (3) minutes to speak. City Council is unable to respond directly to quesCons or enter into dialogue with commenters. Comments may also be submiKed prior t o [email protected]. by 12 p.m. the day of the meeCng. Submissions and supplemental attachments are considered public records pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5.

SPECIAL NEEDS ACCOMMODATIONS: In compliance with the Americans with DisabiliCes Act and Title VI, if you need Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Exhibit A - 2025 Subcommittee Appointments Attachment 3 - Exhibit B - 2025 Regional Board and Committee Apointments and Schedule
Attachment 4 - Exhibit C - 2024 Subcommittee Meeting Schedule Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Clearwater Ranch Letter
Attachment 2 - Presentation
4 special assistance to parCcipate in this meeCng, please contact the City Clerk's office at [email protected] or 707.894-1712. NoCficaCon at least 72 hours prior to the meeCng will enable the City to make reasonable accommodations are made to provide accessibility to the meeting.

AB 2449: Councilmembers parCcipate in person or teleconference methods consistent with tradiConal provisions of the Brown Act,Government Code § 54953(b), unless the meeCng is being held pursuant to provisions of AB 2449. If a technical issue arises with Zoom or the dial-in opCon, the meeCng will conCnue unless it is being held pursuant to the provisions of Assembly Bill 2449.

AB 343: Any wriCngs or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspecCon in the City Hall offices located at 124 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, CA 95425 during normal business hours as provided by Assembly Bill 343.

WAIVER WARNING: If you challenge decisions/direcCons of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearings described in this agenda, or in wriKen correspondence delivered to the City of Cloverdale, or prior to, the public hearing.

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
The City Clerk’s Office does hereby declare that, in accordance with California Government Code § 54954.2(a), this agenda for the above stated meeting(s) was posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting (24 hours prior to a Special Meeting) on the outdoor bulletin board at City Hall, 124 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, CA, 95425 and the Cloverdale Performing Art Center, 209 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, CA, 95425, and online at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter. The agenda is also available for public review at City Hall at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting.

Date posted: January 17, 2025 | Time posted: 10:45 p.m. | City Clerk Signature: s/Mike Maloney

CLOVERDALE NEWSLETTER
Interested in receiving useful informaCon and updates about City events, iniCaCves, acCviCes, budget and public meetings? Visit www.cloverdale.net/newsletter and subscribe to "The Cloverdale Weekly Newsletter." 5 From: Kevin Thompson
To: Michael Maloney
Subject: FW: Cloverdale Rancheria
Date: Thursday, January 16, 2025 4:25:49 PM
Attachments: Cloverdale Rancheria Support Connecting Cloverdale to the Bay – Equitable Transportation Access and Resilience Project.pdf
From: Vickey Macias <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2025 3:57 PM
To: Kevin Thompson <[email protected]>
Subject: Cloverdale Rancheria
Hello Kevin
My name is Vickey Macias, Tribal Treasurer from the Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California. One of the five Tribal Council for our Tribe. We hope to do an introduction as soon as we are able to set up an appointment. We wanted to pass on a letter we are sending regarding the Support of the Connecting Cloverdale to the Bay – Equitable Transportation Access and Resilience Project. If you can please pass on to your City Council for their information.

Thank you
Vickey Macias
Cloverdale Rancheria Tribal Treasurer
6 CLOVERDALE RANCHERIA TRIBAL COUNCIL
Patricia Hermosillo Maria Elliott Buffy Roope Vickey Macias Marcos Hermosillo Chairperson Vice-Chairperson Secretary Treasurer Tribal Representative

Cloverdale Rancheria
555 S. Cloverdale Blvd. ~ Cloverdale, CA 95425
(707) 894-5775 ~ Fax (707) 894-5727
January 16, 2025
Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Subject: Support for Connecting Cloverdale to the Bay – Equitable Transportation Access & Resilience Project Application for FY 2024 RAISE Funding
Dear Secretary:

On behalf of the Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians, I am pleased to support the collaborative partnership led by the County of Sonoma requesting Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) 2024 funds for the Connecting Cloverdale to the Bay – Equitable Transportation Access and Resilience Project. The County of Sonoma, in partnership with Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART) and the City of Cloverdale, seek rural planning funds to advance three critical project to ensure the north of Sonoma County and adjacent areas are economically and environmentally resilient and prepared for the unfortunate reality of future climate related catastrophes.

We are integrally connected to the community of Cloverdale and surrounding areas. We value our relationship with the Cloverdale community, and we participate and invest in the social, educational and cultural happenings in the Cloverdale area. Our Tribal members well-being – economic, health and environmental well-being – is intertwined with the well-being of Cloverdale and Northern Sonoma County. This project location includes the SMART rail and pathway project that will restore the un-rehabilitated railroad tracks from Healdsburg through our lands in Cloverdale to the Mendocino County line.

We have collectively been on record since 2017 through the regional planning tribal consultation as having one named capital project priority: SMART must reach Cloverdale.

Northern Sonoma County is vast and for our families to truly thrive they need access to basic healthy housing and high quality, affordable transit services and active transportation infrastructure. This project partnership will advance all those necessary investments for our rural community. Without safe pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure locally in Downtown Cloverdale, without a reliable permanent bridge over the Russian River and without the regional SMART rail investment, communities are held hostage by climate disasters and the requirement of car ownership for basic access.

We thank you for your consideration of this RAISE request to support our rural community.

Sincerely,
cc: City of Cloverdale
7 From: ROB KOSLOWSKY
To: ROBERT KOSLOWSKY
Subject: Carbon Neutral by 2030
Date: Sunday, January 19, 2025 7:46:43 PM
Carbon Neutral by 2030
“For the U.S., one recent study in Nature found reducing emissions only 80% by 2050 will cost more than $2.1 trillion in today’s money annually by midcentury.

That is more than $5,000 per American a year.”
– Bjorn Lomborg, WSJ, January 6, 2022
More taxes and fees are coming our way courtesy of activist politicians seeking an impossible dream. That ideological wish is an arbitrary desire for carbon neutrality in five years. So, Proposition 4, another climate taxation scheme was hatched, and with it, the targeting of homeowners [1] to pay for carbon neutrality.

Proposition 4 is nothing more than a property tax that adds another $100 per year to pay for a statewide climate bond, that duplicates what’s already in place with other existing taxes and fees. California voters are being asked to pay, again, for another $10 billion bond (a demand, recently reduced from $15.5B) to pay for already funded projects related to reducing fire risks, slowing and capturing runoff to improve groundwater infiltration, protecting coastal communities from sea-level rise, and helping big cities lower heat-island effects through greening projects and adding cooling centers. Funds already exist for dealing with these issues.

As I asked and asserted in a recent editorial, “Why are homeowners being asked to pay again, and again? Vote ’NO’ on Prop 4.” Unfortunately, this initiative passed with a 60 to 40-percent majority.

But There’s More to Come!
The poorly named Climate Action and Resiliency Division (it’s pushing climate, not resiliency) of Sonoma County has recommended [2] “starting with 25 measures over the next two years, with an estimated price tag of $38 million.”
Additional taxes beyond property taxes, in the form of state and federal grants, will be required to finish most of the county’s actions. As reported, “County staff are also pursing grants to fund the remaining project costs, said Barbara Lee, director of the climate division.”
A whole division, without accountability and transparency, is seeking more tax money for “county operations ranging from composting and energy upgrades in county buildings to transitioning the county’s light-duty fleet to 30% zero emissions by 2026 and completing a risk assessment and sea/bay level rise plan.”
8 And this is just 25 steps in the first phase of a complex plan, which includes more money for planning, consultants, and outside contractors. Is it any wonder that the fastest growing employment sector is government workers and not the private sector? It’s private sector employees and their ever-increasing tax loads that pay for such boondoggles.

But the second phase of ‘climate action’ is more onerous. It will target private businesses and citizens. “Reaching carbon-neutrality by 2030 is an expansive task but Lee is hopeful,” concludes reporter Emma Murphy. Not only expansive, but it’s expensive and invasive. More taxation will be needed to pay for phase 2, plus those new regulations [3, 4, 5] being added with even more planned by county and state bureaucrats will be invasive.
“California Attorney General Rob Bonta seems outraged that Exxon ‘duped the public by promoting [plastic] recycling even though the process isn’t economical.’ Who wants to tell him about wind, solar and EVs?”
- D. Casey Jones, Olympia, Washington, October 7, 2024
“The Democratic Party has taken all of us—and especially we Latinos and Latinas— for granted . . . Inflation, lawlessness, and an open border, highest unemployment rate—second in the nation—groceries, gas, you name it. And as a Latina, they will never take away my gas stove because you cannot toast a tortilla on an electric range.”
- Gloria Romero, a former Democrat who was state Senate majority leader, 2005- 08, October 13, 2024, Coachella, California
[1] Hoodwinking the Homeowner, R.K. Koslowsky, submitted March 1, 2020. [2] Emma Murphy, Carbon neutral by 2030? Press Democrat, September 25, 2024. [3] “Americans rank climate change far down among their priorities—below the availability and cost of energy . . . A new YouGov survey shows that less than a quarter of the electorate supports a rapid transition to renewables . . . Only 47% of voters said they would support spending even $1 more each month on their electricity bill to fight climate change . . . Cynically though, the same green activist groups that urged the Biden administration to spend trillions of dollars on climate policies have publicly supported Ms. Harris’s decision to stay quiet about climate. They worry that being too green in the campaign could turn off voters. But if Ms. Harris wins, they’ll be right back at the White House, lobbying for even more expensive policies.”
- Bjorn Lomborg, Harris Stops Talking About Climate Change, WSJ, October 25, 2024. [4] “On Nov. 8, just three days after an election marked by concerns over rising costs, the California Air Resources Board will hold a public hearing and vote on its plan to amend the Low Carbon Fuel Standard . . . In an initial assessment last year, the air board projected that the proposed standard could potentially raise the per-gallon price of diesel by 59 cents and for gasoline, 47 cents, in 2025.”
- Alejandro Lazo, Climate program revamp would boost gas prices, CalMatters, October 27, 2024.
[“The California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved changes to the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), as ABC10 reported . . . That’s a program aimed at helping the state meet its climate goals and reduce pollution.” Gas prices will soon 9 significantly rise across California.]
[5] None of this climate action is having a significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions.

According to Callie Patteson & Maiden Merino, writing for Daily on Energy in The Washington Examiner, January 9, 2025, U.S. EFFORTS TO CURB EMISSIONS FALL OFF TRACK WITH PARIS GOALS:
“The United States is falling behind on targets set under the Paris Agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, despite major efforts by the Biden administration to support renewable and clean energy. New research published by the Rhodium Group reveals that greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. dropped by only 0.2% in 2024 – a fraction of the

3.3% drop from the year before. At this rate, the research firm estimated that the U.S. is far off the trajectory needed to meet the Paris Agreement goals of reducing emissions by 50% in 2030 compared to 2005 levels . . . Demand for energy soared by 3% in the past year, largely thanks to artificial intelligence developments, data center growth, and electrification. The study found that the residential sector in fact led overall demand for electricity . . . To meet this demand, the industry primarily utilized increased fossil fuels, wind, and solar energy. Natural gas remains the largest single source of electricity in the U.S., with renewables slowly picking up more ground.”
Rob Koslowsky
Author of The Tubbs Fire.

Also author of The Upstart Startup & Breach of Trust.

Author's page
10 From: ROB KOSLOWSKY
To: Kevin Thompson
Cc: Todd Lands; Darren Hernandez; Public Comments
Subject: Water and Fire Hydrant Infrastructure
Date: Saturday, January 18, 2025 5:54:29 AM
Kevin,
The LA Fire Chief recently said that she was not responsible to check water supplies. That was up to the City of LA (LADWP). And just like the City of Santa Rosa during the Tubbs fire of 2017, water tanks were either empty (earthquake retrofit) or half full (water conservation goal). In both situations, just over 7 years and 427 miles apart, there was NO WATER available to fight fires.

With that in mind, where does the City of Cloverdale stand with regard to water storage, water levels of its reservoir tanks, refill of depleting water tanks during a wildfire event (or multi-structure fire event), and fire hydrant pressure?
The need for larger diameter water mains to move water quickly to fires from storage locations is an important goal. Note that additional water mains are the usual means of increasing flow capacity. With ongoing wildfires reported on the news, constructing a new water supply exclusively for fire hydrants would be an alternative to providing additional piping to the drinking water supply historically connected to hydrants.

Treatment and storage facilities required for drinking would be unnecessary for water used exclusively for firefighting.

Are such issues being discussed among our water, sewage, and city management teams?
Please advise.

Thanks,
...Rob
Rob Koslowsky
Author of The Tubbs Fire.

Also author of The Upstart Startup & Breach of Trust.

Author's page
11 From: Sally Evans
To: City Council
Subject: Dog Park
Date: Monday, January 20, 2025 10:17:46 AM
Mayor and Council Members,
Thank you for supporting the construction of the dog park at long last. It is an asset for our city. We utilize it regularly, and find that even travelers passing through town enjoy it with their pets. And, Hector and his maintenance crew keep it up very well.

One glaring problem are the four inside posts erected to support the shade cloth. A number of dogs during play have been injured, running into those posts, our dog included. I know of a friend's dog that was also injured. Could there be some kind of padding wrapped around these four posts? It would, of course, have to be "water" (urine) proof. Or, perhaps soft barriers of some kind. This is not a lightweight problem, as many dog owners are worried about their distracted pets crashing into the posts while playing.

We appreciate your consideration of this request, knowing the time, energy, and money already spent in constructing such a great area for the dogs.

Sally and Jim Evans (and Kenai the dog),
102 Plumeria Court
Cloverdale, California 95425
(707) 8944448
12 Marin/Sonoma
Mosquito & Vector
Control District
2024 Annual Report
Peter Bonkrude, MS- District Man
13 Brief
History….
• Early 1900s: The San Rafael
Improvement Club is in charge of
mosquito control
• 1903-1905- Research on salt marsh
mosquitoes was conducted in Marin
County
• November 6, 1915: The first district in
California is formed: Mosquito
Abatement District No.1, also known
as the Marin Mosquito Abatement
District (MAD)
• 1976 Annexed Central Sonoma and its
surrounding areas
• 1995: MAD changes its name to
Marin/Sonoma Mosquito and Vector
Control District
• Now serve 763,000 residents in both
Marin and Sonoma County
14 Agency at a glance
• 36 Fulltime Employees
• 6-8 Seasonal Employees
• 18 Trustees (Independent Board Members)
• 6 additional vacancies: Rohnert Park,
San Anselmo, Ross, Sebastopol, Marin
County at Large, Sonoma County at
Large
• Covers two counties, nearly 2,300 square
miles
• $12.1M Annual Budget for 2024-2025
15 Programs and Services
• Mosquito control
• Mosquitofish
• Yellowjacket control
• Surveillance for adult mosquitoes, ticks, and pathogens • Rodent control advice and inspections
• School presentations – grades K – 8
• Insect Identification
16 What is Integrated
Vector Management
(IVM)?
An approach to controlling vector-borne diseases (WNV,
SLE, WEE, Dengue, Zika, Malaria, Dog Heartworm) by
implementing a combination of strategies that are
environmentally compatible, cost effective and sustainable. • Surveillance
• Vector Control Interventions (Physical, Biological,
Chemical)
• Environmental Management
• Legislation and Policy
• Capacity Building
• Community Participation
17 Local Mosquito Threats
Culex tarsalis
Western Encephalitis Mosquito
West Nile Virus
Culex stigmatosoma
Banded Foul Water
Mosquito
West Nile Virus
Culex erythrothorax
Tule Mosquito
West Nile Virus
Culiseta inornata
Large Winter Mosquito
West Nile Virus
Culiseta particeps
No common name
West Nile Virus
There are 22 different species of mosquito found in Marin and Sonoma Counties. Emerging species of mosquito such
as the Yellow Fever & Asian Tiger mosquitoes could bring the threat of new diseases.
18 Inventory of
Mosquito
Sources
Over 20,000 locations
mapped/monitored
19 BY THE NUMBERS
MSMVCD 2024
2,494 476
6,196

MARIN COUNTY
2,764

INGROUND

YELLOWJACKET
NESTS
3,434

CLASSROOM

PRESENTATIONS
293

TOTAL REQUESTS FOR

SERVICE

SONOMA COUNTY

TOTAL NUMBER

OF STUDENTS
6,623
401
RODENT

INSPECTIONS

ATTENDED
21 EVENTS
2,825

MOSQUITO

CONTROL

MOSQUITOFISH

DELIVERY

FULL TIME

VECTOR CONTROL

TECHNICIANS
20 20
Disease Activity 2024
 No WNV incidences in both
Marin and Sonoma County
 WNV Statewide: 124 cases
12 fatalities, 2,006 positive
mosquito samples
 SLE Statewide: 0 human
cases, 34 positive mosquit
samples
 Locally Acquired Dengue: 1
cases (all in Southern
California)
21 22
Tick Testing Program
Adult: Western Black-legged Tick
23 Tick Testing Program
Nymphal Stage
24 25
Rodents
26 Yellow Jackets
27 Public Outreach &
Education:
• Press Democrat/Marin IJ
• Social Media: Nextdoor
• Newsletter sent to subscribers
• Six Radio stations
• Presentations to community
groups & in workplaces
• Targeted display ads on streaming
services e.g. Hulu, Vimeo
28 Social Media Posts
29 30
3D Printing for Specialized Equipment
Sterile Insect Techniques

EMERGING TECHNOLOGIE
31 Questions?
Peter Bonkrude, MS- District Manager
[email protected]
www.msmosquito.org
(707) 285-2200
32 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item:

Meeting Date:

F.1
January 22, 2025
Agenda Section
Consent
Staff Contact
Kevin Thompson, City Manager
Agenda Item Title:

Consider adoption of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving the Active Transportation Plan and finding this action is exempt from further environmental review under the General Rule in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines section 15061(b)(3).

Recommended Council Action:

Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving the Active Transportation Plan and Finding this Action is Exempt from Further Environmental Review Under the General Rule in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061 (B)(3).” Background:

The Cloverdale Active Transportation Plan (ATP) is an update to the Cloverdale Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan adopted in 2014. The ATP has been developed as part of the Countywide Active Transportation Plan through a grant awarded to the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA) and contract held by SCTA.

City staff and SCTA have worked closely with the consultant team, Fehr & Peers, to gather data and establish existing conditions, engage the community, conduct technical analyses, and develop the Active Transportation Plan. City staff and the consultant team previously presented an overview of the project as well as draft projects and policies to the Planning Commission on October 11, 2023; April 2, 2024; and October 1, 2024. City staff and the consultant team also previously presented the Draft Active Transportation Plan to the City Council on October 23, 2024.

Summary:

Active Transportation Plan
The attached PowerPoint presentation provides an overview of the Active Transportation Plan content.

The maps presented in the attached PowerPoint presentation summarize the following:
• Proposed Bikeways and Corridor Projects: Shows proposed bikeways and corridor projects in the City’s ATP.
• Proposed Sidewalk Improvements & Crossing Improvements: Shows the draft sidewalk gap closures in the City’s ATP.
• Existing & Proposed Active Transportation Network: Shows the combined networks of existing facilities with the proposed projects.

For more details, please refer to the attached PowerPoint presentation and the Cloverdale Active Transportation Plan, also attached.

33 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: January 22, 2025

Alternative Options:

1. Reject recommended resolution.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Budget/Financial Impact:

N/A
Subcommittee Recommendation:

None
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A – City of Cloverdale Active Transportation Plan

3. Presentation slides
34 CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING THE ACTIVE

TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND FINDING THIS ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL

REVIEW UNDER THE GENERAL RULE IN CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECITON 15061 (B)(3).

WHEREAS, the City adopted a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan in 2008, and subsequently approved an update to the Cloverdale Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan on February 12, 2014; and WHEREAS, it is desirable and beneficial to update the plan from time to time; and WHEREAS, to reflect and accommodate changes and expansions in human powered mobility choices, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is now referred to as the Cloverdale Active Transportation Plan (Plan); and WHEREAS, the Plan provides guidance and implementation measures to improve citywide active transportation circulation; and
WHEREAS, in 2023 the City partnered with the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA) to have the Plan be developed as part of an “umbrella” Countywide Active Transportation Plan; and WHEREAS, the Countywide plan includes individual bicycle and pedestrian plans for each participating agency; and
WHEREAS, public engagement started in 2023 with a pop-up event at the Farmers Market in November 2023 and another pop-up event at the Fire and Earthquake Safety Expo in May 2024, a public workshop held in June 2024 at the Cloverdale Performing Arts Center, a project website and online surveys distributed through social media, mailing lists, the City of Cloverdale website, as well as SCTA’s website and newsletters; and WHEREAS, SCTA staff, the consultant and City staff brought updates and the draft Plan to the Planning Commission which allowed additional opportunities for public comment at regularly scheduled public meetings held on October 11, 2023, April 2, 2024, and October 1, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Plan is a document to guide future actions with specific projects and goals requiring separate council approval and funding; and
WHEREAS, the Plan consists of the Plan text, tables, and graphics, as shown in Exhibit “A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Plan is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Cloverdale General Plan including the Circulation Element update that is underway by promoting and supporting an integrated network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cloverdale does hereby resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. RECITALS
The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. 35 SECTION 2. APPROVAL
The Active Transportation Plan is hereby approved and the next phase of incorporation into the General Plan Circulation Element Update, grant applications, project development, and implementation shall be initiated.

SECTION 3. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
The City Council, in its independent judgement, finds that pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed activity is not subject to CEQA because approval of the Active Transportation Plan, in and of itself, will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Any future projects resulting from the Plan will require compliance with CEQA prior to any decision by the Planning Commission and/or City Council.

It is hereby certified that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on this 22nd day of January 2025, by the following Roll Call vote:

YES: ( )
NO:( )
ABSTAIN: ( )
ABSENT: ( )
APPROVED: ATTEST:
_______________________ ____________________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
36 City of
Cloverdale
Active
Transportation
Plan

37 This page was intentionally left blank.
38 Cloverdale Active
Transportation Plan (ATP)
January 2025
39 40
Table of Contents

1. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1

2. Community Profile & Walking, Biking & Rolling Today......................................................... 3 Community Characteristics and Travel Patterns........................................................................................ 3 Road Safety in Cloverdale ............................................................................................................................ 4 Existing Active Transportation Network Characteristics in Cloverdale..................................................... 4

3. Community & Stakeholder Engagement............................................................................ 11

4. Vision & Goals ................................................................................................................. 13

5. Advancing Active Transportation ..................................................................................... 15 Infrastructure Improvements .....................................................................................................................15 Considerations for Facility Type .........................................................................................................15 Planned Projects ..................................................................................................................................16 Sidewalk Gap Closure Projects ...........................................................................................................19 Engineering Treatments Toolbox........................................................................................................25 Policies & Actions .......................................................................................................................................34

6. Implementation: Local Considerations ............................................................................. 39 Timeline.......................................................................................................................................................39 Policy Actions.......................................................................................................................................39 Planned Projects ..................................................................................................................................39 Funding........................................................................................................................................................43 Monitoring ...................................................................................................................................................45 Appendices
Appendix A Sidewalk Gaps
Appendix B Project Prioritization
41 List of Figures
Figure 1. Existing Bikeway Network ................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2. Existing Transit Network ..................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 3. Existing Sidewalk Gaps with Project Numbers .................................................................................. 9 Figure 4. Level of Stress (LTS) and 2022 High Injury Network (HIN).............................................................10 Figure 5. Proposed Bikeway & Corridor Projects ............................................................................................22 Figure 6. Proposed Sidewalk Improvements...................................................................................................23 Figure 7. Existing & Proposed Active Transportation Network ......................................................................24 List of Tables
Table 1. Bike Facility Selection for Urban, Suburban, Rural Town Centers1 ..................................................16 Table 2. Planned Infrastructure Improvements: Bike Facilities, Multiuse Paths, and Crossing Enhancements...............................................................................................................................17 Table 3. Sidewalk Gap Closure Projects ..........................................................................................................19 Table 4. Catalog of Resources .........................................................................................................................25 Table 5. 2025 Active Transportation Network – Cost Estimates Summary..................................................41 Table 6. Potential Funding Sources, Competitive Grants, and Formula-Based Fundings ............................44 Table 7. Monitoring Progress ...........................................................................................................................45 42 This page was intentionally left blank.
43 44
1 1. Introduction
The 2025 Cloverdale Park Active
Transportation Plan (ATP) was developed as
a component of the Sonoma County
Transportation Authority‘s (SCTA’s) 2025
Countywide Active Transportation Plan
(Countywide ATP) effort. This plan focuses
on improving active transportation
connections within the city and creating low
stress connections to surrounding
jurisdictions. The Cloverdale ATP is also a
stand-alone document the City of Cloverdale
can use to guide implementation of local
projects and policies.

The primary emphasis of this planning effort
is to increase access to active transportation
modes by planning for infrastructure projects
and identifying supportive policies. Active
transportation refers to “human-powered”
modes of travel, like walking, biking, or using
mobility devices. Creating an environment
that encourages a shift from automobile trips
to walking or biking trips also promotes
improvements to mental and physical health,
air quality, reduces noise, and improves
social equity. A safer and more connected
network gives members of the community
flexibility in their travel, so they do not need to
rely on a personal vehicle to travel through
the city and larger region.

Projects are prioritized based on the needs
highlighted by the community and city staff.

Policies are in line with the city’s near-term
plans and funding priorities. The City of
Cloverdale did not identify any local
programs specific to active transportation
due to budget and staff constraints;
however, they are committed to
coordinating with SCTA and participating in
relevant countywide active
transportation programs.

The previous Cloverdale Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) adopted in
2014 identified a general expansion of
walking and biking facilities. Since the 2014
BPMP was updated, several changes and
advancements have been made in the state
of active transportation planning practices.

For example, SCTA adopted Vision Zero in
2021, which is a regional commitment to
eliminate traffic fatalities and serious
injuries through engineering, programs,
policies, and education. Cloverdale
subsequently adopted the Vision Zero
Action Plan locally. There have also been
policy changes at the national and state
level acknowledging a greater need for more
robust infrastructure, programs, and policies
to make walking and biking safer. With
those and other similar advancements in
mind, this plan focuses on:
• All Ages and Abilities – Creating
spaces for people to walk, bike, and
roll that are low-stress and lower risk
to create more opportunities for more
people to walk, bike, and roll.
• Regional Coordination – Identifying
and planning regional routes between
jurisdictions as part of the larger
Countywide ATP.
• Implementation – Prioritizing projects
and identifying funding to focus and
streamline implementation.

Low-stress network analysis was used to
identify opportunities to upgrade or enhance
existing or previously planned projects. The
network analysis considered community
and regional destinations, traffic safety, and
gaps in existing facilities to help inform
recommendations for enhanced or new
active transportation improvements.

Community input was gathered to ground
truth and expand findings from the network
analysis to create a robust project list and
supporting policies.
45 2 46
3 2. Community Profile &
Walking, Biking &
Rolling Today
Community Characteristics and Travel Patterns
The City of Cloverdale has a population of approximately 9,0001 and is roughly bound by the Russian River and US 101 to the east and the inner Northern Coast Ranges to the west.

Downtown Cloverdale features locally owned galleries, a community theater, and restaurants as well as the annual summer concert series Friday Night Live. An essential component for the Active Transportation Plan includes fostering a pedestrian and bicycle friendly environment along Cloverdale Boulevard, the city’s main arterial and gateway that connects downtown and runs parallel to US 101.

In the past two decades, Cloverdale has experienced steady growth, both in the development of land uses and in the number of people residing within the city. Cloverdale is a city with a size, scale, and climate well-suited for walking and biking. In 2010, the city adopted the Cloverdale Station Area/Downtown plan to guide the city’s integration of future passenger rail service via SMART, identify opportunity sites for development along Citrus Fair Drive and Cloverdale Boulevard, as well as downtown. Leveraging the existing and future assets and investing in new and safe multi-modal connections could encourage more users to consider active transportation modes while traveling through the city and region.

Approximately 59 percent of the city’s population is between the ages of 18 to 64 years old, and 20 percent are 65 and older.2 Creating an environment that accommodates all ages and abilities and makes the first/last mile connections to transit is crucial toward promoting and enabling more walking, biking, and rolling for daily travel needs. Census data indicate four percent of workers currently walk to work, zero percent bike or take transit, 78 percent use single occupancy vehicles, eight percent carpool, 9 percent work from home and zero percent take other means of transportation to work.

As the city continues to grow, there is a need for safer, low stress, and better-connected walking, biking, and rolling facilities.
1 https://censusreporter.org/profiles/16000US0614190-cloverdale-ca/ 2 https://censusreporter.org/profiles/16000US0614190-cloverdale-ca/ 47 4
Road Safety in Cloverdale
Per the California Office of Traffic Safety, as of 2020, Cloverdale is categorized as one of the 74 cities in Group F, cities with a population between 2,501 – 10,000 people. The city ranked 48 in the total fatal and injury collision category3. This indicates Cloverdale had fewer fatal and injury collisions than the majority of similar sized cities in California. According to the SCTA Vision Zero Data Dashboard, from 2015 through 2019 there were zero fatal and 3 severe injury traffic collisions in Cloverdale during that time. There were three severe or visible injury or complaints of pain collisions involving people walking or biking during this period. The Cloverdale Boulevard corridor was where nearly all the collisions were reported.

The contributing factors of crashes tended to be cited as improper turning, unsafe speeds, and driving under the influence. According to the UC Berkeley’s Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) and California’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), from 2015 through 2019 there were zero fatal and two severe injury traffic collisions during that time. There was one severe injury collision involving people walking or biking during this period.

Existing Active Transportation Network Characteristics
in Cloverdale
Today, Cloverdale has north-south bike lanes along Foothill Boulevard and Cloverdale Boulevard through much of the city. There are also bike lanes along Atsi Road, Citrus Fair Drive, and portion of Crocker Road. These are supplemented by some designated bike routes in the old town area of the city. The existing bike network provides basic north-south connectivity for individuals who are confident and capable riders. As will be discussed further below and reflected later in the planned projects, there are several opportunities to improve the biking conditions to enable and attract a broader range of individuals to bike. The current sidewalk network tends to be complete in and around the old town area as well as central and southern parts of the city. The sidewalk gaps tend to be located where topography or grade becomes steep and/or along edges of city limits where the character becomes more rural.

There are opportunities to improve active transportation connections along the Cloverdale Boulevard corridor and to/from nearby recreational uses via new and existing trails. There are also opportunities to create low-stress north-south connections to connect schools and activity centers as an alternative to Cloverdale Boulevard as well as connect future development in the south. Additional low-stress east-west connections are desired by community members to access parks along the western edge of the city and along the Russian River in the east. The following figures illustrate these needs.

Figure 1 illustrates the existing bikeway network. The bikeway network is organized into several distinct facility types, detailed below.
• Multi-Use Paths (Class I) are fully separated bike and pedestrian paths. They follow their own alignment sometimes parallel to a street, waterway, and/or other 3 https://www.ots.ca.gov/media-and-research/crash-rankings-results/ 48 5
configuration through open space or undeveloped areas. Interactions with vehicles are limited to street trail crossings.
• Bike Lanes (Class II) are on-street bike facilities that use a white line or stripe (i.e., longitudinal pavement marking) to designate space on the street for bicyclists that is adjacent to a vehicle lane.
• Buffered Bike Lanes (Class IIB) increase space between the bike lane and vehicle travel lane(s) using a painted buffer. The painted buffer is often made up of two parallel white lines with diagonal white lines painted between them. Green pavement markings can be used at driveways or intersections to draw attention to where vehicle paths cross bicyclists’ paths.
• Bike Routes (Class III) are shared facilities between bicyclists and motor vehicles.

Bicyclists ride in the vehicle lane. Bike routes are sometimes used to provide a connection to another bike facility or designated bike route. “Sharrows” (shared-lane markings) may be used to alert motorists to the presence of on-street bicyclists.

Signs may also be used to mark the route.
• Bike Boulevards (Class IIIB) are streets designed to give priority to people walking and biking. Bicycle boulevards are streets with one vehicle lane in each direction and traffic calming treatments are used to slow vehicle speeds to under 25 mph and discourage non-local vehicle traffic. Treatments can include some combination of speed tables, raised crosswalks, speed humps, traffic diverters, chicanes, curb extensions at crosswalks, and/or neighborhood traffic circles at intersections.

Advisory Bike Lanes could be an alternative facility for existing or planned bike boulevards (or bike routes)4.
• Separated Bike Lanes (Class IV) are on-street bike facilities that include physical separation between bicyclists and vehicle traffic. Ideally, the physical separation provides protection to the bicyclist through use of materials such as concrete medians (with or without landscaping), planters, and/or the bike lane could be separated by a curb to raise the bike lane to either sidewalk height or an intermediate height. Green pavement markings can be used at driveways or intersections to draw attention to where vehicle paths cross bicyclists’ paths as well as additional intersection treatments to enhance safety.

The existing transit network, as illustrated in Figure 2, includes transit services and amenities within or immediately adjacent to Cloverdale. In Cloverdale, Sonoma County Transit (SCT) provides local bus service via Route 68–Cloverdale Shuttle with weekday and Saturday headways of 40-45 minutes. Route 68 does not operate on Sundays. Cloverdale is also served by SCT Route 60 which provides connections from Cloverdale to Healdsburg, Windsor, and Santa Rosa with headways of 20-90 minutes. SCT buses are equipped with bike racks. Regional and greater Bay Area connections can be made via Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART). The closest SMART station to Cloverdale is the Sonoma County Airport Station. However, a northern extension and station in Windsor is currently under 4 fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/publications/small_towns/fhwahep17024_lg.pdf 49 6
construction and the long-range vision for the SMART system includes planned extensions to Cloverdale.

Transit routes in Cloverdale are provided along major arterials and streets throughout the city. Improved bike connections, upgraded bike facilities, and traffic calming, as shown in Figure 3, will help enable more people to walk and bike generally as well as to transit stops.

As described above, to enable more people to walk, bike and roll, and to use these modes to access transit, the spaces built to support those uses need to be safe and comfortable.

Figure 4 illustrates the results of a Level of Traffic Stress analysis used to gauge level of comfort traveling along a given street. Figure 4 also denotes the streets within Cloverdale that were identified as part of SCTA’s High Injury Network5 (HIN) developed as part of SCTA’s Vision Zero Action Plan.6
An LTS 1 rating indicates the least stressful (most comfortable) facilities. Low stress (LTS 1 or 2) facilities in Cloverdale include Cloverdale River Park Trail and Asti Road. LTS 4 indicates the most stressful (least comfortable) facilities. LTS 4 Facilities in Cloverdale include Cloverdale Boulevard and Crocker Road.

Defining Level of Traffic Stress
Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) analysis takes different travel corridor characteristics into consideration, including the number of travel lanes, speed of traffic, number of vehicles, presence of bike lanes, width of bike lanes, and presence of physical barriers providing protection from traffic. Based on these variables, a bike facility can be rated with an LTS ranging from 1 to 4.

The least stressful (most comfortable) facilities are assigned an LTS 1 rating. Facilities with this rating are typically shared-use paths, separated bikeways, low-volume and low-speed bike routes, and bike lanes on calm and narrow streets. The most stressful (least comfortable) facilities are assigned an LTS 4 rating. Facilities with this rating are typically major arterials with multiple lanes of traffic (with or without bike lanes in some cases, depending on speeds) or narrower streets with higher speed limits.
5 The High Injury Network is a compilation of road segments with an elevated risk of crashes resulting in an injury or fatality, identified through an analysis of the frequency, severity, and mode of past crashes. 6 https://scta.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Sonoma-Vision-Zero-Action-Plan_Final-1.pdf 50 7
Figure 1. Existing Bikeway Network
51 8
Figure 2. Existing Transit Network
52 9
Figure 3. Existing Sidewalk Gaps with Project Numbers
53 10
Figure 4. Level of Stress (LTS) and 2022 High Injury Network (HIN) 54 11

3. Community & Stakeholder
Engagement
Initial outreach for the Cloverdale ATP began in the fall of 2023. In coordination with city staff, staff from other participating jurisdictions, and SCTA, the Countywide ATP project team prepared a Stakeholder Coordination Plan and Community Engagement Plan to guide community engagement and milestone presentations to local and regional advisory bodies and relevant committees. More details on the countywide community and stakeholder engagement approaches and outcomes are detailed in the 2025 Countywide ATP.

The first community outreach event in Cloverdale was a pop-up hosted by SCTA and the project team at the Cloverdale Farmers Market in November 2023. This event gathered input from the general public on existing conditions for walking and biking in Cloverdale.

In October 2023, the Countywide ATP project team published a project webpage and online survey and distributed it through the City of Cloverdale website, social media, and the city’s November newsletter. SCTA/RCPA also distributed the webpage and survey through its newsletter, mailing list, and social media. During community outreach in Fall 2023, 31 comments were received in Cloverdale.

Project Web Map Survey with 31 comments in Cloverdale
55 12
In general, public feedback received through the
first and second rounds of outreach in 2023 &
2024 revealed the following themes:
• Biking: regular street sweeping, plan for
the maintenance of facilities, provide
education around e-bike use
• Walking: large emphasis on closing
sidewalk gaps, pedestrian-scale lighting
• Traffic calming: implement on collectors
and residential streets, especially around
schools to address speeding
• Trails: add and maintain amenities for pedestrians along walking routes (such as benches), plan for the maintenance of facilities
• Destinations: better pedestrian/bike access to downtown • Roadways: more active transportation improvements are needed along regional routes that connect to the city
City staff and the project team presented the draft vision and goals, and a draft proposed projects list to the Planning Commission in April 2024. City staff and the project team hosted an additional pop-up engagement event at the Fire and Earthquake Safety Expo in May 2024.

In collaboration with SCTA, city staff and the project team also hosted an open house in June 2024 at the Cloverdale Performing Arts Center. Both events gathered input from the general public on draft proposed projects and prioritization, draft programmatic recommendations, and the overall Draft Plan to improve conditions for walking and biking in Cloverdale.

In November 2024, the Draft Plan was brought back to the Planning Commission for review.

Finally, in early 2025, city staff and the project team presented the Plan to City Council for adoption.

City staff and project team hosting an open house at
the Cloverdale Performing Arts Center
56 13

4. Vision & Goals
The vision and goals statements were developed to be consistent with SCTA’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Moving Forward 2050, and were refined based on input provided by SCTA’s Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, the Cloverdale Planning Commission, and other SCTA Countywide committees. The City of Cloverdale’s active transportation vision is as follows:
“Our guiding principles are to improve safety, connectivity, equity, and quality of life. Walking, biking, and rolling shall be safe and appealing modes for people of all ages and abilities to use for everyday transportation and recreation.” The city’s active transportation goals are the following:

1. Connected and Reliable – Deliver a continuous active transportation network that links daily activities and housing, and that allows people of all ages and abilities to use a variety of transportation types easily, affordably, and dependably.

2. Safe and Well-Maintained – Create and sustain a high-quality and low-stress active transportation network. Employ Vision Zero and Safety Plan policies and strategies to advance this goal.

3. Community Oriented and Place-Based – Tailor projects to the surrounding community contexts and user profiles. Support a diversity of uses and users and create community through active transportation programs and policies that prioritize walking, biking, and rolling.

Cloverdale has also developed a series of Policies and Actions to guide implementation of the ATP, which are aligned with these three goals and presented in Chapter 5’s Policies section.
57 14 58
15 5. Advancing Active
Transportation
The following are the planned infrastructure improvements for enhancing active transportation in the City of Cloverdale.

Infrastructure Improvements
Enhancing the safety and comfort of existing facilities as well as expanding the infrastructure and spaces available for active transportation modes are critical to creating opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to walk, bike, and roll. The section below presents locations, extents, and brief descriptions of planned projects followed by a summary of types of treatments and engineering resources the city may use in designing and implementing the planned projects.

Considerations for Facility Type
As mentioned earlier in this Plan, the bikeway facilities are organized into several distinct types (see page 4 and 5 for descriptions). The transportation planning and engineering profession is evolving toward using Multi-Use Paths, Buffered Bike Lanes, Bike Boulevards, and Separated Bike Lanes as often as possible to increase safety and comfort for people biking. Those facility types provide more separation between bicyclists and moving vehicles and/or slow vehicle speeds to under 25 mph.

Table 1 summarizes the conditions under which each bike facility type is ideally applied. 59 16
Table 1. Bike Facility Selection for Urban, Suburban, Rural Town Centers1 Bike Facility Type Prevailing Vehicle Speed (mph) Vehicle Volume (vehicles per day) Multi-Use Paths2 n/a n/a
Bike Lanes3 25 to 30 mph 3,000 to 6,500
Buffered Bike Lanes3 25 to 30 mph 3,000 to 6,500
Bike Routes4 Under 25 mph Less than 3,000
Bike Boulevards4 Under 25 mph Less than 3,000
Separated Bike Lanes5 30 mph and Higher 6,500 and Above Notes:
(1) Table content summarized based on information in FHWA’s Bikeway Selection Guide.7 (2) Multi-use paths are off-street and follow their own alignment. They can be useful for providing parallel, low stress routes to existing streets regardless of those streets volumes or speeds. (3) Buffered Bike Lanes are preferred over Bike Lanes.
(4) Bike Boulevards are preferred over Bike Routes.
(5) Separated Bike Lanes physically separate bikes from moving vehicles using treatments that provide protection such as medians, planters, or raising the bike lane to a height similar to a sidewalk.

The planned projects identify a facility type to either enhance existing facilities or close gaps in the network. Generally speaking, facility type selection was informed by the information summarized in Table 1 as well as considerations for feasibility and continuity with existing land use and street context.

Planned Projects
Table 2 presents planned projects for enhancing walking, biking, and rolling conditions in Cloverdale, including bikeway, pedestrian crossing, and ADA improvements. It includes the priority for each project. Tier 1 indicates high priority, Tier 2 medium priority, and Tier 3 low priority. Section 6 describes the prioritization process. 7 https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/docs/fhwasa18077.pdf 60 17
Table 2. Planned Infrastructure Improvements: Bike Facilities, Multiuse Paths, and Crossing Enhancements
Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
1 Asti Rd from Crocker Road
to Santana Drive
Install multi-use path or separated bike lane. Included as an SCTA Regional Route. Tier 1
2 Asti Rd and Citrus Fair Dr Upgrade intersection control to all-way stop control. Tier 2 3 Santana Dr from Asti Rd to
S Cloverdale Blvd
Install separated bike lane with intersection crossing
enhancements. Included in the MTC Regional Active
Transportation Network.

Tier 3
4 Citrus Fair Dr
Install separated bike lane with conflict striping and buffer with vertical elements. Improve sidewalks. Repaint
crosswalks to be high-visibility. Add connection to South St.

Tier 1
5 Asti Rd between E 1st and
Citrus Fair Dr
Install traffic calming and pedestrian improvements such as new and widened sidewalks, new and improved sidewalks,
and additional lighting along 1st and Crocker Rd. Included in the MTC Regional Active Transportation Network.

Tier 1
6 In between Foothill Blvd
and N Foothill Blvd Install multi-use path. Tier 3
7 Asti Rd and Crocker Rd / E
1st St Conduct intersection redesign study. Tier 2
8 N Cloverdale Blvd and
North St Improve pedestrian crossings. Tier 1
9 N Franklin St and S Franklin
St Install bike boulevard. Tier 1
10 W 2nd St from N Franklin
St to W 2nd St Install bike boulevard. Tier 1
11 N Foothill Blvd to 1st St Install multi-use path. Tier 2 12 Healdsburg Ave from
Foothill Blvd to S Franklin
St
Install bike boulevard. Tier 2
13 Healdsburg Ave from S
Franklin St to Cloverdale
Blvd
Install bike lanes. Tier 1
14 Cloverdale Blvd from
northern City Limits to E/W
3rd St
Install bike lanes. Buffered or separated bike lanes could be considered if on-street parking and/or the two-way center turn lane were reconfigured.

Tier 2
15 E 4th St Install bike lanes. Tier 2
16 School St Install bike boulevard. Tier 1
17 North Foothill Blvd Install bike boulevard. Tier 3
18 Jefferson St from North St
to W 3rd St Install bike lanes Tier 3
19 N Washington St to S
Washington St and Citrus
Fair Dr
Install bike boulevard. Tier 2
20 3rd St W from N Cloverdale
Blvd to Commercial St Install bike boulevard. Tier 1
61 18
Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
21 3rd St W from Commercial
St to N Washington St Install bike lanes. Tier 3
22 Commercial St from W 3rd
St to W 1st St Install bike lanes. Tier 3
23 Main St from N Main St
and E 2nd St to S Main St
and Lake St
Install bike lanes. Tier 2
24 Main St from N Main St
and E 2nd St to S Main st
and Lake St
Install multi-use path. Included in the MTC Regional Active Transportation Network and as an SCTA Regional Route. Tier 1 25 Cloverdale Blvd from 1st St
to Citrus Fair Dr Install separated bike lanes. Tier 1
26 Sandholm Ln Install bike boulevard. Included in the MTC Regional Active Transportation Network. Tier 3
27 Foothill Blvd and Sanholm
Ln to Kelly Rd (southern
most)
Install bike lanes. Included in the MTC Regional Active Transportation Network. Tier 3
28 S Cloverdale Blvd from S
Cloverdale Blvd and Citrus
Fair Dr to 200' south
Close northbound bike lane gap. Tier 2
29 School St from North
Jefferson St to North
Cloverdale Blvd
Implement traffic calming measures. Tier 2
30 South Cloverdale Blvd from
South Franklin St to
Healdsburg Ave
Implement traffic calming measures. Tier 2
31 Champlain Ave Implement traffic calming measures or close the street to through vehicle traffic. Tier 2
32 Champlain Ave and North
Jefferson St Install all-way stop control. Tier 3
33 Cloverdale Blvd from
Healdsburg Ave to Citrus
Fair Dr
Manage vegetation and repave sidewalks. Tier 1
35 Treadway Dr and Hatteras
Way Install a marked crosswalk across Treadway Dr. Tier 3 36 Citrus Fair Dr and
Cloverdale Blvd Intersection redesign study. Potential for a roundabout. Tier 1 38 East 2nd St and North Main
St Install marked crossings. Tier 1
192 Foothill Boulevard and St
John Implement crossing improvements. Tier 3
193 Foothill Boulevard and
Cherry Creek Road Implement crossing improvements. Tier 3 194 School Street and
Cloverdale Boulevard Improve pedestrian crossings. Tier 1 195 Mulberry and 1st Street Implement crossing improvements. Tier 1 62 19
Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
196 Cloverdale Boulevard &
Healdsburg Ave Implement additional crossing improvements. Tier 3 197 Elbridge Avenue &
Cloverdale Boulevard
Implement crossing improvements and intersection safety enhancements. Tier 1
198
Elbridge Ave from
Cloverdale Boulevard to
Western Terminus
Install bike boulevard. Tier 3
199
Cloversprings Drive to Red
Mountain Drive to Del
Webb Drive to Cloverdale
Blvd
Install bike boulevard. Tier 3
200 Brookside Drive to western
terminus Install bike boulevard. Tier 3
201 Brookside Drive to eastern
terminus Install bike boulevard. Tier 3
202
Cherry Creek Road from
Tarman Drive to western
city limit
Install bike lanes. Tier 3
203 East 1st Street and US 101
Undercrossing
Install bike lanes as part of Caltrans undercrossing
improvement. Included in the MTC Regional Active
Transportation Network and is on a Caltrans facility.

Tier 3
204 Venezia Way and North
Street
Crossing improvement to raise the existing crosswalk and/or install RRFB.

Notes
(1) Crossing improvements could include high visibility markings, pedestrian-scale lighting, curb extensions (a.k.a. bulb outs), leading pedestrian intervals at signals, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB) or pedestrian hybrid beacons (PHB) at unsignalized intersections.
(2) Project priorities are included in Table 2. Prioritization methodology is explained in Section 5. Implementation:

Local Considerations.
(3) Projects on Caltrans Right of Way are highlighted in blue. (4) Caltrans District 4 Bicycle Plan: https://dot.ca.gov/caltrans-near-me/district-4/d4-programs/d4-transplanning-localassistance/d4-office-of-transit-and-active-transportation/d4-bike-plan-info (5) MTC Regional Active Transportation Network: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/e77c08c157c54493931af81eaf950c02 Sidewalk Gap Closure Projects
Table 3 summarizes the projects that address existing sidewalk gaps throughout the city prioritized as Tier 1. Sidewalk gap closure projects are locations where there is a sidewalk gap on one or both sides of a street. A full list of sidewalk gap projects is in Appendix A.

Table 3. Sidewalk Gap Closure Projects
Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
37 South Cloverdale Boulevard
from West St to Citrus Fair Dr Flatten sidewalk on east side Tier 1 45 Asti Road from Citrus Fair
Drive to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 63 20
Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
51 Costal Plywood Timber
Company Road from Asti
Road to city limits
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 60 Asti Road from Citrus Fair
Drive to Citrus Fair Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
61 Asti Road from Lake Street to
Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 66 Citrus Fair Drive from South
Washington Street to Citrus
Fair Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
67 Hazelden Road from East 1st
Street to Hazelden Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 73 South Cloverdale Boulevard
from South Franklin Street to
Cherry Creek Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
75 East Street from Lake Street
to Railroad Avenue
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
91 South Street from Clark
Avenue to South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
98 Asti Road from East 1st
Street to Lake Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
118 Railroad Avenue from East
Street to Railroad Avenue
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
128 Railroad Avenue from East
Street to Railroad Avenue Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 136 Lake Street from Live Oak
Lane to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 138
East 1st Street from
Hazelden Road to Redwood
Highway
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
140 Lake Street from East Street
to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 142 Mulberry Drive from Lake
Street to Lake Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
145 East 1st Street from Asti
Road to Redwood Highway
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
153 Hazelden Road from East 1st
Street to Hazelden Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 156 Lake Street from East Street
to Lake Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
157 Asti Road from Lake Street to
Asti Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
166 Railroad Avenue from East
Street to Railroad Avenue Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 64 21
Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
171
Sherwood Circle from
Ottoboni Drive to Sherwood
Circle
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 182 Asti Road from Citrus Fair
Drive to Citrus Fair Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 187 South Street from Clark
Avenue to South Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
Notes:
(1) Sidewalk gap closures to provide at least one side of the roadway with continuous sidewalks.

Figure 5 illustrates the location of the planned bikeway and corridor improvements, and Figure 6 shows the location of planned pedestrian crossing and sidewalk improvements.

Crossing improvements could include high visibility markings, pedestrian-scale lighting, curb extensions (a.k.a. bulb outs), leading pedestrian intervals at signals, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB) or pedestrian hybrid beacons (PHB) at unsignalized intersections.

Figure 7 shows planned improvements as well as the existing biking network. 65 22
Figure 5. Proposed Bikeway & Corridor Projects
66 23
Figure 6. Proposed Sidewalk Improvements
67 24
Figure 7. Existing & Proposed Active Transportation Network 68 25
Engineering Treatments Toolbox
In designing and implementing the 2025 Active Transportation Network projects, and taking actions to fulfill the policies and goals identified in this Plan, city staff will use engineering treatments consistent with established industry resources and guidance published by reputable organizations such as the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO), California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). The following tables include examples of the types of engineering treatments the city may use in the design and implementation of enhanced active transportation infrastructure.

Table 4 provides a list of available resources the city can use when designing new active transportation infrastructure. While the design guidance in these resources offer options for a wide range of contexts, this is not an exhaustive list of potential resources.

Table 4. Catalog of Resources
Resource Description
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD)
Federal standards on traffic signs, road surface markings, and signals.

A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets (Green Book) National guidance on roadway geometric design AASHTO Guide for the Planning, Design,
and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities,
2nd Edition
Guidance on the planning, design, and operation of pedestrian facilities
FHWA Small and Rural Multimodal
Networks
Reference guide on active transportation facilities in small towns and rural areas
Caltrans DIB -94 Complete Streets:

Contextual Design Guidance
Design guidance to support implementation of complete streets projects on roads owned by Caltrans
FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide Guidance on selecting and designing different types of bikeways based on street and land use contexts
FHWA Separated Bike Lane Planning
and Design Guide
Guidance for planning and designing separated bike lanes under different contexts
NACTO Guides: Urban Street Design
Guide, All Ages and Abilities Guide Reference guides on best practices for street design NCHRP Report 926 – Guidance to
Improve Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety
at Intersections
Step-by-step process for selecting intersection safety treatments FHWA Guide for Improving Pedestrian
Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing
Locations
A reference guide on what type of crosswalk and crossing treatments are most applicable in a given location
Public Rights of Way Accessibility
Guidelines (PROWAG) Guidelines that provide best practices for accessibility LRFD Guide Specifications for Design of
Ped Bridges
Guide Specifications address the design and
construction of typical pedestrian bridges
69 26
Bicycle Facility Toolbox
70 27
Pedestrian Facility Toolbox
71 28 72
29 73
30 74
31 75
32 Traffic Calming Toolbox
76 33 77
34 Policies & Actions
The City of Cloverdale has a series of Policies and Actions to guide the implementation of the ATP including actions to promote active transportation within Cloverdale. The Policies and Actions support each of the Plan’s goals as shown below.

GOAL 1: Connected and Reliable
Deliver a continuous active transportation network that links daily activities and housing, and that allows people of all ages and abilities to use a variety of transportation types easily, affordably, and dependably.

POLICY 1-1: Prioritize and implement bike and pedestrian projects identified in the ATP, as the amount of funding available to Cloverdale allows.

Action 1-1.1: As budget allows, amend Cloverdale’s Traffic Development Impact Fee Study to include certain projects identified in the updated ATP.

POLICY 1-2: The city’s 5-Year Capital Improvement Program shall incorporate and include funding for bike and pedestrian improvements identified in the ATP, as well as maintenance of active transportation facilities.

POLICY 1-3: Prioritize closure of sidewalk gaps that connect people to activity centers, schools, transit, healthcare, parks, and the downtown area, ensuring that streets safely serve seniors, youth, those with disabilities, and all members of the community.

POLICY 1-4: All public streets shall have a sidewalk connecting to the broader network, on a minimum of one-side, phased as city funding and/or nexus with private development allows.

Determining the appropriate side shall be based on the existing sidewalk network, environmental conditions, and impediments to construction.

POLICY 1-5: As part of city or private development projects, enhance pedestrian and bike facilities along or adjacent to all arterial roadways. Multi-use path and separated bike lanes should be the first choice in the design of all new multi-modal infrastructure.

POLICY 1-6: Ensure adequate bike parking is available citywide.

POLICY 1-7: Prioritize ADA improvements in high-volume pedestrian areas.

POLICY 1-8: Work cooperatively with responsible agencies including the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA), Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART), Sonoma County Water Agency, and others to close existing facility gaps and ensure the active transportation network is implemented, constructed, and maintained.

POLICY 1-9: Proactively seek opportunities for acquisition of abandoned rights-of-way, flood control rights-of-way, and lands for the development of new multi-use pathways in coordination with SCTA and Sonoma County Parks.

POLICY 1-10: Increase the U.S. Census derived “Journey to Work” mode split percentage for walking and biking by 50% by the year 2040.
78 35
POLICY 1-11: Work with federal, state, regional, and local agencies to secure funding to implement the citywide active transportation system. Encourage multi-jurisdictional funding applications to implement the regional active transportation system.

POLICY 1-12: Install wayfinding and directional signage, markers, and stencils on off-street paths, on-street bikeways, local roads, and state routes to improve wayfinding for bicyclists and pedestrians, assist emergency personnel, and heighten motorists’ awareness.

POLICY 1-13: Prioritize affordable housing development sites close to existing and future transit hubs and neighborhood serving amenities which support families cutting down on driving and transportation costs. Require adequate sidewalk connectivity to existing pedestrian network and street frontage improvements as a condition of approval.

GOAL 2: Safe and Well-Maintained
Create and sustain a high-quality and low-stress active transportation network. Employ Vision Zero and Safety Plan policies and strategies to advance this goal.

POLICY 2-1: Seek opportunities to separate existing and future bike facilities from motor vehicle traffic with buffers or greater protection such as a curb, flexible bollards, delineators, or other more durable barriers on streets where vehicle speeds are greater than 25 mph. Use best practices when designing bicycle facilities.

POLICY 2-2: Develop and operationalize a sidewalk repair program to ensure the city maintains or enforces maintenance of sidewalks. Continue to engage with the community to prevent obstruction of sidewalks and pedestrian facilities with parking, trash bins, signs, etc.

POLICY 2-3: Maintain all bike lane symbols, striping, green paint, and buffer paint and ensure all bike lanes have standard bike symbols. Ensure bike lanes are kept free of trash bins, vehicles, and debris.

POLICY 2-4: Require that road construction projects minimize their impacts on active transportation users through the proper placement of construction signs and equipment, and by providing safety detours.

POLICY 2-5: Provide additional pedestrian safety improvements at intersections and crossings.

Action 2-5.1: Increase pedestrian safety at controlled and uncontrolled crossings, where needed, to complete pedestrian networks and provide access to destinations.

Utilize industry best practices such as the FHWA Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations, ADA standards, and Caltrans Roadway Lighting Manual.

Action 2-5.2: Increase pedestrian safety at intersections. Utilize proven countermeasures identified by FHWA including signal phasing, timing adjustments, high visibility crosswalks, curb extensions, pedestrian refuge islands, and pedestrian scale lighting.

POLICY 2-6: Improve bicycle safety at controlled and uncontrolled intersections, using proven countermeasures identified by FHWA and other industry resources. 79 36
POLICY 2-7: Implement and incorporate actions in Cloverdale and SCTA’s adopted Sonoma County Vision Zero (VZ) Action Plan.

Action 2-7.1: Support Safe Routes to School program and school districts to promote safe, active transportation through education, school policies, and pick-up/drop-off procedures (VZ Action 3.1).

Action 2-7.2: Prioritize low-cost quick-build projects to rapidly implement bike and pedestrian safety improvements along the High Injury Network (VZ Action 4.1).

Action 2-7.3: Prioritize closing gaps in bike and pedestrian networks and design facilities for all ages and all abilities (VZ Action 4.6).

Action 2-7.4: As street improvements are conceptualized, align designs to reflect latest research and best practices around safety, active transportation facilities, and Complete Streets, with an emphasis on serving diverse road users of all ages and abilities (VZ Action 4.8). Street maintenance practices shall also incorporate current industry practices for active transportation facilities.

Action 2-7.5: Enhance training for law enforcement personnel responsible for crash reporting to address the unique attributes required to accurately report circumstances of crashes involving bicyclists, pedestrians, and other vulnerable road users (VZ Action 6.1).

Action 2-7.6: Use regional data sources such as the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's Regional High Injury Network and Regional Safety Data System, and Caltrans District 4 location-based needs identified by their active transportation planning efforts to inform safety project development and funding decisions (VZ Action 6.3).

POLICY 2-8: Review and update speed limits on city-owned roadways based on updated California MUTCD guidance.

POLICY 2-9: Implement daylighting in alignment with California ruling AB 413, painting curbs red within 20 feet of any marked or unmarked crosswalk.

POLICY 2-10: Coordinate with Sonoma County Parks to post appropriate speed limits on multi-use paths to regulate e-scooter and e-bike use.

POLICY 2-11: Consider e-bikes, e-scooters, and other mobility devices when designing bicycle facilities such as potentially wider facilities as well as forgiving edge treatments (e.g., mountable curbs).

GOAL 3: Community Oriented and Place-Based
Tailor projects to the surrounding community contexts and user profiles. Support a diversity of uses and users and create community through active transportation programs and policies that prioritize walking, biking, and rolling.

POLICY 3-1: Explore opportunities throughout the city to add amenities such as landscaping, shade, public art, seating, and drinking fountains.
80 37
POLICY 3-2: Work with transit providers to offer and maintain all-weather shelters and other amenities at transit stops and transportation centers.

POLICY 3-3: Where possible and/or desirable, utilize alternative surfaces for pathways such as decomposed granite, crushed rock, or other natural-like materials.

POLICY 3-4: Continue to work with the SCTA to develop a regional bike share/ micromobility program.

POLICY 3-5: Encourage and incentivize more people to walk, bike, and roll through education and encouragement activities such as special events, Bike-to-Work Day, and social media campaigns.

POLICY 3-6: Coordinate with school districts and the appropriate local or regional agency having jurisdiction (or successor city agency) to identify opportunities for increased bike and pedestrian education with a focus on youth education.

POLICY 3-7: Refine the community engagement process to include a diversity of community members who bring lived experiences that represent the full cross-section of Cloverdale residents. Continue to be transparent and open to all community members during the engagement process.

POLICY 3-8: Support the development of a multi-use pathway along the SMART right-of-way, independent of the re-establishment of rail and transit operations.

POLICY 3-9: Support community education around e-bike and e-scooter use. Coordinate with local school districts, parks, and public health.
81 38 82
39 6. Implementation: Local
Considerations
The following outlines a timeline and potential funding sources the city can use to make consistent, steady progress towards achieving its vision and goals for enhancing walking, biking, and rolling.

Timeline
Policy Actions
Putting the Active Transportation Plan policies into action is a critical initial step in providing a foundation for buildout and utilization of the network. Many of the policies and the broader Active Transportation Program identified in this Plan are ongoing or recurring considerations and activities, that once initiated, will sustain investment in active transportation improvements as well as institutionalize designing streets for safe and comfortable walking, biking, and rolling.

Planned Projects
Prioritization
Opportunities to advance specific projects towards implementation will be dependent on external factors (e.g., land use projects, successful grant applications). With this in mind, the planned projects identified in this Plan have been prioritized into three tiers:
• Tier 1 – High Priority
• Tier 2 – Medium Priority
• Tier 3 – Low Priority
The criteria used to sort the projects into each tier were as follows:
• Safety – Extent to which the project is on a portion of the SCTA Vision Zero HIN and/or if it has been identified in the city’s Local Road Safety Plan as a priority location.
• Equity – Extent to which the project would improve active transportation access or conditions for an equity-focus population as defined at the regional, state, or federal level.
• Proximity to Existing and Future Transit – For a given project, the distance from an existing or future bus stop or transit station.
• Proximity to Schools – For a given project, the distance from an existing school. 83 40
• Low-Stress Gap Closure – Scored based on whether the project would close a gap in the low-stress network, with extra points for projects on the Sonoma County Regional Routes network.

For each criterion, each project received a score based on the extent to which it fulfilled the criteria. The collective scores were normalized into a single number or index. Tiers 1, 2, and 3 were established to align with the top, middle, and bottom third of the project scores.

Projects are presented by tier in Table 2.

Once sorted into each of the three buckets, projects are not sorted within each tier to give city staff discretion and flexibility to respond to various opportunities that arise and can facilitate implementation. Within the broader Countywide ATP, the project prioritization criteria is aligned with project selection criteria for the Go Sonoma funding program.

Initial Steps Towards Implementation
To advance the projects in the ATP towards implementation, staff can undertake the following types of activities.
(1) As per Policy 1-1 above, establish a citywide Traffic Impact Fee that includes high priority projects from the ATP.
(2) Review and incorporate ATP projects into the city’s five-year Capital Improvement Program (see Policy 1-2 above).
(3) Review upcoming maintenance projects/activities to identify where active transportation improvements can be incorporated into things like pavement rehabilitation (e.g., installing high visibility crosswalks or bike lanes when the new pavement is put in place). (4) Review current as well as future development project applications to ensure or require consistency of street frontage with planned ATP projects. (5) Coordinate with SCTA on upcoming potential funding opportunities with particular focus on the SCTA Funding Program as well as support or collaboration on state or federal funds such as HSIP, SS4A, and ATP (those and additional funding sources are highlighted below).

Appendix B contains detailed prioritization results for each project to help aid staff in understanding which of the prioritization criteria a given project met. Such information can aid in determining suitable grant funds and/or where opportunities may overlap with other efforts like Safe Routes to School or supporting access to transit.

Cost Estimates
This section presents the costs estimates for implementing the 2025 Active Transportation Plan. Project cost estimations were developed to provide a general idea of the anticipated cost for each proposed project type. These estimates are based on an engineering review of unit costs and quantities for the project types shown. They are based solely on construction costs and do not include other soft costs that may be associated with projects (e.g., design, environmental, permitting, construction management).
84 41
Table 5 summarizes project costs by project type and prioritization tier for the 2025 Active Transportation Network.

Table 5. 2025 Active Transportation Network – Cost Estimates Summary Project Type Unit Cost Quantity Cost Estimate
Tier 1 Priority Projects
Multi-Use Path1 $1,023,500/mile 3.96 miles $4,053,060
Bike Lane2 $176,000/mile 0.19 miles $33,440
Buffered Bike Lane3 $574,000/mile 0 miles $0
Bike Route4 $12,500/mile 0 miles $0
Bike Boulevard5 $87,500/mile 1.6 miles $140,000
Separated Bike Lanes6 $1,655,000/mile 0.68 miles $1,125,400 Crossing Improvement
(Unsignalized)7 $8,000 to $60,000 6 locations $48,000 to $360,000 Crossing Improvement
(Signalized)8 $8,000 to $120,000 1 location $8,000 to $120,000 Sidewalk Installation9 $480/linear feet 9,513 linear feet $4,566,552 Corridor Study $300,000/mile 0.12 miles $36,000
Traffic Calming10 $75,000/mile 0.54 miles $40,500
Total Tier 1 Priority
Projects11 $10M to $10.5M
Tier 2 Priority Projects
Multi-Use Path1 $1,023,500/mile .22 miles $225,170
Bike Lane2 $176,000/mile 1.56 miles $274,560
Buffered Bike Lane3 $574,000/mile 0 miles $0
Bike Route4 $12,500/mile 0 miles $0
Bike Boulevard5 $87,500/mile 0.66 miles $57,750
Separated Bike Lanes6 $1,655,000/mile 0 miles $0
Crossing Improvement
(Unsignalized)7 $8,000 to $60,000 2 locations $16,000 to $120,000 Crossing Improvement
(Signalized)8 $8,000 to $120,000 0 locations $0
Sidewalk Installation9 $480/linear feet 17,779 linear feet $8,534,237 Corridor Study $300,000/mile 0 miles $0
Traffic Calming10 $75,000/mile 0.68 miles $51,000
Total Tier 2 Priority
Projects11 $9.2M to $9.3M
85 42
Project Type Unit Cost Quantity Cost Estimate
Tier 3 Priority Projects
Multi-Use Path1 $1,023,500/mile 0.37 miles $378,695
Bike Lane2 $176,000/mile 1.50 miles $264,000
Buffered Bike Lane3 $574,000/mile 0 miles $0
Bike Route4 $12,500/mile 0 miles $0
Bike Boulevard5 $87,500/mile 2.18 miles $190,750
Separated Bike Lanes6 $1,655,000/mile 0.21 miles $347,550 Crossing Improvement
(Unsignalized)7 $8,000 to $60,000 5 location $40,000 to $300,000 Crossing Improvement
(Signalized)8 $8,000 to $120,000 0 locations $0
Sidewalk Installation9 $480/linear feet 36,515 linear feet $17,526,979 Corridor Study $300,000/mile 0 miles $0
Traffic Calming10 $75,000/mile 0 miles $0
Total Tier 3 Priority
Projects11 $18.7M to $19M
2025 Active
Transportation Network
Total All Projects11 $38.0M to $38.7M
Notes:
(1) 12’ wide AC path, 2’ gravel shoulders, striping and 4 signs per mile. (2) Unidirectional bike lanes on each side of a two-way street. Striping, green thermoplastic for conflict markings at intersections and driveways (assumed to occur every 100feet and are 5’ wide x 20’ long), and 4 signs per mile. (3) Unidirectional bike lanes on each side of a two-way street. Pavement marking in 3’ wide AC buffer lane along entire length, green thermoplastic for conflict markings at intersections and driveways (assumed to occur every 100feet and are 3’ wide x 20’ long), and 4 signs per mile.
(4) “Sharrow” or similar type of pavement marking at 250-foot intervals and 8 signs per mile. (5) “Sharrow” or similar type of pavement marking at 250-foot intervals, 8 signs per mile, and a combination of traffic calming treatments which could include, but are not limited to, neighborhood traffic circles, raised crosswalks, high visibility crosswalk markings, speed humps, chicanes, and curb extensions.
(6) Unidirectional bike lanes on each side of a two-way street. 7’ wide AC Bikeway, concrete edge treatment/median in buffer, bikeway stripe, pavement marking, 4 signs per mile and three signalized intersection improvements per mile. (7) Improvements at unsignalized intersections include, but are not limited to, pedestrian refuge islands, high visibility crosswalks, rectangular rapid flashing beacons, raised crosswalks, and curb extensions. (8) Improvements at signalized intersections include, but are not limited to, two-stage bike turn boxes, bike signals, high visibility crosswalks, cross-bike or bike conflict markings, pedestrian count down signals, and implementing directional curb ramps.
(9) Both sides of street. 7’ wide concrete sidewalk and underlying compacted base material, including curb and gutter. (10) Traffic calming includes one, or a combination of improvements, including but not limited to treatments such as neighborhood traffic circles, raised crosswalks, added crosswalk markings, speed humps and curb extensions. (11) Price per mile assumes “blank slate” and includes new pavement improvements only. (i.e., no demo, drainage, etc.).

Mobilization, traffic control, etc., are excluded.
86 43
Funding
This section describes the funding sources available to fund the projects and programs identified in this plan. In addition to local funding sources such as the Capital Improvements Program and developer fees, Table 6 presents a list of competitive grants and formula-based funding programs that have been reviewed for potential consideration to address financial needs of the projects identified in the plan. Further discussion of regional and federal funding options is included in the 2025 Countywide ATP.

Several of the funding sources listed are included in the SCTA Funding Program, which generally covers a four-year period. Recognizing the need for a coordinated approach to match the highest-priority projects with available transportation funding sources, SCTA developed the SCTA Funding Program in 2021. Priorities are identified through a call for projects to help SCTA assess and prepare projects for multiple funding programs as well as pair the best projects with the best fund sources available. Projects are evaluated to assess how they address planning and funding goals both locally and regionally to be competitive for the available funding. Cycle 2 of the SCTA Funding Program is anticipated to launch in Summer 2025, and will include funding from the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) Cycle 4 (CMAQ and STP funds), 2026 STIP funds, LPP funds, Go Sonoma funds, and other local funding. The majority of the funds in Cycle 2 will be available in Fiscal Year 2027/28 through Fiscal Year 2030/31.
87 44
Table 6. Potential Funding Sources, Competitive Grants, and Formula-Based Fundings Regional Funding Sources
GoSonoma https://scta.ca.gov/measure-m/gosonoma/
Transportation Development Act, Article 3 (TDA3) https://scta.ca.gov/projects/funding/#tda3 State of California Funding Sources
AHSC – Affordable Housing and Sustainable
Communities https://sgc.ca.gov/programs/ahsc/
ATP – Active Transportation Program https://catc.ca.gov/programs/active-transportationprogram CleanCA – Clean California https://cleancalifornia.dot.ca.gov/ HSIP – Local Highway Safety Improvement
Program
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-andstate-programs/highway-safety-improvement-program LPP – Local Partnership Program https://catc.ca.gov/programs/sb1/local-partnershipprogram PROTECT – Promoting Resilient Operations for
Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-Saving
Transportation
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-andstateprograms/protect REAP – Regional Early Action Planning https://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-and-funding/programsactive/regional-early-action-planning-grants-of-2021 RC:H2B – Reconnecting Communities: Highways
to Boulevards
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-andstate-programs/rc-h2b RMRA & HUTA – Road Maintenance and
Rehabilitation Account & Highway Users Tax
Account
https://www.sco.ca.gov/aud_road_maintenance_sb1.htm
l
SCCP – Solutions for Congested Corridors
Program
https://catc.ca.gov/programs/sb1/solutions-forcongested-corridors-program Federal Funding Sources
ATIIP – Active Transportation Infrastructure
Investment Program
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestri
an/atiip/
CMAQ – Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Improvement Program
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/congestio
nmitigation-and-air-quality-improvement-cmaq-program
RAISE – Rebuilding American Infrastructure with
Sustainability and Equity https://www.transportation.gov/RAISEgrants RSTG – Rural Surface Transportation Grant
Program
https://www.transportation.gov/grants/rural-surfacetransportation-grant SMART – Strengthening Mobility and
Revolutionizing Transportation https://www.transportation.gov/grants/SMART SS4A – Safe Streets and Roads for All https://www.transportation.gov/grants/SS4A STIP – State Transportation Improvement Program https://catc.ca.gov/programs/state-transportationimprovement-program STP – Surface Transportation Block Grant https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/specialfunding/stp/ 88 45
Monitoring
Staff will track progress towards implementing this Plan’s content as well as achieving this Plan’s goals using the measures shown in Table 7. On an annual basis, as part of staff’s update on the General Plan progress, they will report to the Planning Commission and City Council the most recent status for each measure below.

Table 7. Monitoring Progress
Measures Baseline Data Source Frequency
Goal: Connected &
Reliable
Miles of bikeway facilities
(total) 9.0 miles City data Annual
Linear feet of sidewalk
gaps (total) 63,807 feet City data Annual
Goal: Safe & WellMaintained
KSI pedestrian and bike
involved collisions with
goal those are zero
Ped: 1/Bike: 0 2015-2019; SWITRS Annual
Number of crossing
improvements installed n/a City data Annual
Goal: Community Oriented
& Place Based
Number of active
transportation
improvements within a
1/4 mile of transit/bus
stop
n/a City data Annual
Number of new or
upgraded bike parking
facilities
n/a City data Annual
Notes:
“n/a” Indicates a baseline number for the measure is not applicable. 89 Appendix A Sidewalk Gaps
Table A-1. All Sidewalk Gap Projects
Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
34 Cloverdale Blvd from East
Cherry Creek Rd to
Hillview Dr
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalks facilities on one side Tier 2
37 South Cloverdale
Boulevard from West St to
Citrus Fair Dr
Flatten sidewalk on east side Tier 1
39 East 1st St from Asti Rd to
city limits (to the east) Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 40 Vista View Drive from King
Ridge Road to North
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 41 Asti Road from Santana
Drive to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 42 Asti Road from Citrus Fair
Drive to Citrus Fair Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 43 Shady Lane from S.

Foothill Boulevard to
Shady Lane
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
44 Santana Drive from Asti
Road to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 45 Asti Road from Citrus Fair
Drive to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 46 Vista View Drive from
Stameroff Court to King
Ridge Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 47 Sandholm Drive from S.

Foothill Boulevard to
South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 48 Kelly Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 49 Middlestad Lane from
North Cloverdale
Boulevard to North
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 50 South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Sandholm
Drive to South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 90 Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
51 Costal Plywood Timber
Company Road from Asti
Road to city limits
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 52 North Cloverdale
Boulevard from Vista View
Drive to North Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 53 Sonoma Drive from Clover
Springs Drive to Sonoma
Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
54 Asti Road from Santana
Drive to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 55 King Ridge Road from
Vista View Drive to King
Ridge Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 56 Chelsea Circle from
Chelsea Circle to Chelsea
Circle
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 57 Cherry Creek Road from
Cherry Creek Ct to Cherry
Creek Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 58 Cherry Creek Road from S.

Foothill Boulevard to
Cherry Creek Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 59 Oakbrook Lane from
North East Street to
Oakbrook Lane
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
60 Asti Road from Citrus Fair
Drive to Citrus Fair Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
61 Asti Road from Lake
Street to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 62 Cherry Creek Court from
Cherry Creek Road to
Cherry Creek Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
63 Sherwood Circle from
Sherwood Circle to
Sherwood Circle
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 64 Evergreen Lane from Lake
Street to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 65 South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Elbridge
Avenue to South
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
91 Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
66 Citrus Fair Drive from
South Washington Street
to Citrus Fair Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
67 Hazelden Road from East
1st Street to Hazelden
Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 68 South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Sandholm
Drive to South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
69 South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Church
Lane to South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
70 Hillside Drive from Kerry
Lane to School Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 71 Cherry Creek Road from
South Foothill Boulevard
to Cherry Creek Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
72 East Cherry Creek Road
from Tarman Drive to
Cherry Creek Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 73 South Cloverdale
Boulevard from South
Franklin Street to Cherry
Creek Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
74 Champlain Avenue from
Washington Street to
North Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
75 East Street from Lake
Street to Railroad Avenue
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
76 South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Sandholm
Drive to South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 77 Lake Street from
Evergreen Lane to Lake
Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 78 Airport Road adjacent to
southern city extent Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 79 Cherry Creek Court from
Cherry Creek Road to
Cherry Creek Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 92 Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
80 North Street from Venezia
Way to North Jefferson
Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 81 Josephine Drive from
North Foothill Boulevard
to Josephine Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 82 South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Elbridge
Avenue to South
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 83 Ranch House Drive from
Elbridge Avenue to
Cottage Court
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
84 Haehl Street from Silva
Drive to Haehl Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
85 University Street from
North Cloverdale
Boulevard to North
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
86 Elbridge Avenue from
South Cloverdale
Boulevard to Maguerite
Lane
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 87 Clovercrest Drive from
Oak Lane to Clovercrest
Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 88 Toscana Circle from Milan
Court to Portofino Way
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
89 East 1st Street from Asti
Road to Crocker Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 90 Shahan Drive from Grace
Court to North Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 91 South Street from Clark
Avenue to South
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
92 Block Drive from Oak Lane
to Clovercrest Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 93 North Foothill Boulevard
from West 2nd Street to
West 2nd Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
94 South Washington Street
from Citrus Fair Drive to
West 1st Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
93 Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
95 North Cloverdale
Boulevard from
Middlestad Lane to North
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 96 Kay Court from Heidi Lane
to Kay Court
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
97 North Cloverdale
Boulevard from Oat Valley
Road to North Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 98 Asti Road from East 1st
Street to Lake Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
99 Live Oak Lane from Lake
Street to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 100
West 2nd Street from
North Foothill Boulevard
to West 2nd Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 101
North Street from Venezia
Way to North Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
102 Orange Drive from Orange
Drive to East 2nd Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
103 Kerry Lane from Hillside
Drive to Kerry Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 104
Charles Street from
School Street to Haehl
Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
105
Triplett Drive from North
Main Street to Triplett
Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 106 Santana Drive from Asti
Road to Santana Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 107 Silva Drive from School
Street to Haehl Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
108
Santana Drive from South
Cloverdale Boulevard to
Santana Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 109
Ranch House Drive from
S. Foothill Boulevard to
Homewood Court
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
110
Butler Court from North
Jefferson Street to North
Jefferson Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
94 Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
111 Hillside Drive from Hillside
Court to Kerry Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 112
South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Santana
Drive to South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
113
Ranch House Drive from
Cottage Court to
Homewood Court
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
114 Crocker Road from East
1st Street to Crocker Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 115 Shady Lane from Hot
Springs Rd to Shady Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 116
Vista View Drive from
Stameroff Court to North
Main Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
117
School Street from
Charles Street to North
Jefferson Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
118
Railroad Avenue from
East Street to Railroad
Avenue
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
119
Stameroff Court from
Vista View Drive to
Stameroff Court
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 120 Orange Drive from Orange
Drive to East 2nd Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 121 Grace Court from Shahan
Drive to Shahan Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 122
Hillside Court from
Hillside Drive to Hillside
Court
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
123
Santana Drive from South
Cloverdale Boulevard to
South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
124
Treadway Drive from
Furber Lane to South
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
125
Northstar Lane from
Moonlight Circle to
Northstar Lane
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 95 Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
126
Elbridge Avenue from S.

Foothill Boulevard to
Ranch House Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
127 Milan Court from Toscana
Circle to Milan Court
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
128
Railroad Avenue from
East Street to Railroad
Avenue
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 129
South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Hillview
Drive to Cherry Creek
Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
130
South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Hillview
Drive to Cherry Creek
Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
131
South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Sandholm
Drive to South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 132
South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Sandholm
Drive to South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
133
Elbridge Avenue from
Ranch House Drive to
Ranch House Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
134 Santana Drive from Asti
Road to Asti Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
135
South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Church
Lane to South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
136 Lake Street from Live Oak
Lane to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 137
Clovercrest Drive from
Oak Lane to North
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 138
East 1st Street from
Hazelden Road to
Redwood Highway
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
139
Vista View Drive from
Stameroff Court to North
Main Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 96 Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
140 Lake Street from East
Street to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 141
Santana Drive from
Santana Drive to Santana
Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 142 Mulberry Drive from Lake
Street to Lake Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
143 4th Street from Josephine
Drive to 4th Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
144
North Cloverdale
Boulevard from Oat Valley
Road to North Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 145
East 1st Street from Asti
Road to Redwood
Highway
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
146 Oak Lane from Block Drive
to Clovercrest Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 147
Lake Street from
Evergreen Lane to Lake
Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 148
Moonlight Circle from
Polaris Court to Sunrise
Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
149 Shahan Drive from Heidi
Lane to Shahan Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
150
South Washington Street
from Citrus Fair Drive to
Citrus Fair Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
151 Santana Drive from Asti
Road to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 152 Oak Lane from Block Drive
to Oak Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 153
Hazelden Road from East
1st Street to Hazelden
Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 154 Heidi Lane from Shahan
Drive to Kay Court
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
155
Commercial Street from
West 1st Street to West
1st Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
156 Lake Street from East
Street to Lake Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
97 Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
157 Asti Road from Lake
Street to Asti Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
158 School Street from
Hillside Drive to Silva Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
159
School Street from North
Foothill Boulevard to Silva
Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
160 Hillside Drive from Hillside
Court to Kerry Lane
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
161
North Cloverdale
Boulevard from Shahan
Drive to North Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 162
Santana Drive from
Santana Drive to Santana
Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 163
University Street from
North Cloverdale
Boulevard to North
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 164 Shahan Drive from Heidi
Lane to Shahan Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
165
Oat Valley Road from
North Cloverdale
Boulevard to North
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 166
Railroad Avenue from
East Street to Railroad
Avenue
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 167
South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Santana
Drive to South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 168
Tarman Drive from East
Cherry Creek Road to East
Cherry Creek Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
169
Sherwood Circle from
Sherwood Circle to
Sherwood Circle
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 170
Chelsea Circle from
Ottoboni Drive to Chelsea
Circle
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 171
Sherwood Circle from
Ottoboni Drive to
Sherwood Circle
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 98 Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
172
East 1st Street from
Redwood Highway to
Redwood Highway
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
173
Chelsea Circle from
Chelsea Circle to Chelsea
Circle
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 174
Santana Drive from
Redwood Highway to
Santana Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 175 Shahan Drive from Heidi
Lane to Shahan Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 176
Oakbrook Lane from
Oakbrook Lane to
Oakbrook Lane
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
177
Santana Drive from
Redwood Highway to
Santana Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 178
University Street from
North Cloverdale
Boulevard to North
Cloverdale Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
179
Clovercrest Drive from
Block Drive to Clovercrest
Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 180 River Lane north of Berti
Lane within city limits Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 181
Hillside Court from
Hillside Court to Hillside
Court
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
182 Asti Road from Citrus Fair
Drive to Citrus Fair Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 183
South Cloverdale
Boulevard from Hillview
Drive to Cherry Creek
Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 184
Santana Drive from
Redwood Highway to
Santana Drive
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 185
Hillside Court from
Hillside Court to Hillside
Court
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 186
Cherry Creek Road from S.

Foothill Boulevard to
Cherry Creek Road
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3
99 Project
# Project Location Project Description Priority
187 South Street from Clark
Avenue to South Street
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1
188
Oakbrook Lane from
Oakbrook Lane to
Oakbrook Lane
Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2
189 Asti Road from Santana
Drive to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 190
Church Lane from South
Cloverdale Boulevard to
South Cloverdale
Boulevard
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 191
1st Street immediately
east of Mulberry Street
about 250 feet long
Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 Notes:
(1) Sidewalk gap closures to ensure at least one side of the roadway has continuous sidewalks. 100
Appendix B Project Prioritization
101
Project # Project Location Project Description Priority Persistent
Poverty
as
defined by
the IIJA
CA SB
535
MTC's Equity
Priority
Communitie
s
White House
Council on
Environmental
Quality's (CEQ)
Climate and
Economic
Justice
Screening
(CEJST)
USDOT
Equitable
Transportatio
n Community
(ETC)
Explorer
Bike
Projects
within 1
Mile of a
school
Pedestrian
Projects
within 1/2
mile of a
school
Along the
High Injury
Network
Along the
SCTA
Regional
Route
Network
Along the
MTC Active
Transportati
on Corridors
Network
Within
Transit
Priority
Areas
Low-Stress
Facility within
Priority
Development
Area
Within 1/4
mile of a bus
stop
Project
identified as
part of the
Long Range
Safety Plan
1 Asti Rd from Crocker Road to Santana Drive Install multi-use path or separated bike lane. Included as an SCTA Regional Route. Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 N/A
4 Citrus Fair Dr
Install separated bike lane with conflict striping and buffer with vertical elements. Improve sidewalks. Repaint crosswalks to be highvisibility. Add connection to South St.

Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A
5 Asti Rd between E 1st and Citrus Fair Dr
Install traffic calming and pedestrian improvements such as new and widened sidewalks, new and improved sidewalks, and additional lighting along 1st and Crocker Rd. Included in MTC’s Active Transportation Corridors Network.

Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A
8 N Cloverdale Blvd and North St Improve pedestrian crossings. Tier 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 9 N Franklin St and S Franklin St Install bike boulevard. Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 10 W 2nd St from N Franklin St to W 2nd St Install bike boulevard. Tier 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 13 Healdsburg Ave from S Franklin St to Cloverdale Blvd Install bike lanes. Tier 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 16 School St Install bike boulevard. Tier 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 20 3rd St W from N Cloverdale Blvd to Commercial St Install bike boulevard. Tier 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 24 Main St from N Main St and E 2nd St to S Main st and Lake St Install multi-use path. Included in the MTC Regional Active Transportation Network and as an SCTA Regional Route. Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 N/A 25 Cloverdale Blvd from 1st St to Citrus Fair Dr Install separated bike lanes. Tier 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 33 Cloverdale Blvd from Healdsburg Ave to Citrus Fair Dr Manage vegetation and repave sidewalks. Tier 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 35 Treadway Dr and Hatteras Way Install a marked crosswalk across Treadway Dr. Tier 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 36 Citrus Fair Dr and Cloverdale Blvd Intersection redesign study. Potential for a roundabout. Tier 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 38 East 2nd St and North Main St Install marked crossings. Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 194 School Street and Cloverdale Boulevard Improve pedestrian crossings. Tier 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 195 Mulberry and 1st Street Implement crossing improvements. Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 197 Elbridge Avenue & Cloverdale Boulevard Implement crossing improvements and intersection safety enhancements. Tier 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A
2 Asti Rd and Citrus Fair Dr Upgrade intersection control to all-way stop control. Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 7 Asti Rd and Crocker Rd / E 1st St Conduct intersection redesign study. Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 11 N Foothill Blvd to 1st St Install multi-use path. Tier 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 12 Healdsburg Ave from Foothill Blvd to S Franklin St Install bike boulevard. Tier 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 14 Cloverdale Blvd from northern City Limits St to E/W 3rd St Install bike lanes. Buffered or separated bike lanes could be considered if on-street parking and/or the two-way center turn lane were reconfigured.

Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A
15 E 4th St Install bike lanes. Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 19 N Washington St to S Washington St and Citrus Fair Dr Install bike boulevard. Tier 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 23 Main St from N Main St and E 2nd St to S Main st and Lake St Install bike lanes. Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 28 S Cloverdale Blvd from S Cloverdale Blvd and Citrus Fair Dr to 200' south Close northbound bike lane gap. Tier 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 29 School St from North Jefferson St to North Cloverdale Blvd Implement traffic calming measures. Tier 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 30 South Cloverdale Blvd from South Franklin St to Healdsburg Ave Implement traffic calming measures. Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 31 Champlain Ave Implement traffic calming measures or close the street to through vehicle traffic. Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A
3 Santana Dr from Asti Rd to S Cloverdale Blvd
Install separated bike lane with intersection crossing
enhancements. Included in the MTC Regional Active Transportation Network.

Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A
6 In between Foothill Blvd and N Foothill Blvd Install multi-use path. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 17 North Foothill Blvd Install bike boulevard. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 18 Jefferson St from North St to W 3rd St Install bike lanes Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 21 3rd St W from Commercial St to N Washington St Install bike lanes. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 22 Commercial St from W 3rd St to W 1st St Install bike lanes. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 26 Sandholm Ln Install bike boulevard. Included in the MTC Regional Active Transportation Network. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A 27 Foothill Blvd and Sanholm Ln to Kelly Rd (southern most) Install bike lanes. Included in the MTC Regional Active Transportation Network. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 N/A 32 Champlain Ave and North Jefferson St Install all-way stop control. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A Cloverdale Bike Facilities, Multiuse Paths, and Crossing Enhancements Projects Prioritization Criteria 102
Project # Project Location Project Description Priority Persistent
Poverty
as
defined by
the IIJA
CA SB
535
MTC's Equity
Priority
Communitie
s
White House
Council on
Environmental
Quality's (CEQ)
Climate and
Economic
Justice
Screening
(CEJST)
USDOT
Equitable
Transportatio
n Community
(ETC)
Explorer
Bike
Projects
within 1
Mile of a
school
Pedestrian
Projects
within 1/2
mile of a
school
Along the
High Injury
Network
Along the
SCTA
Regional
Route
Network
Along the
MTC Active
Transportati
on Corridors
Network
Within
Transit
Priority
Areas
Low-Stress
Facility within
Priority
Development
Area
Within 1/4
mile of a bus
stop
Project
identified as
part of the
Long Range
Safety Plan
192 Foothill Boulevard and St John Implement crossing improvements. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 193 Foothill Boulevard and Cherry Creek Road Implement crossing improvements. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 196 Cloverdale Boulevard & Healdsburg Ave Implement additional crossing improvements. Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 198 Elbridge Ave from Cloverdale Boulevard to Western Terminus Install bike boulevard. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 199 Cloversprings Drive to Red Mountain Drive to Del Webb Drive to Cloverdale Blvd Install bike boulevard. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 200 Brookside Drive to western terminus Install bike boulevard. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 201 Brookside Drive to eastern terminus Install bike boulevard. Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 202 Cherry Creek Road from Tarman Drive to western city limit Install bike lanes. Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 203 East 1st Street and US 101 Undercrossing
Install bike lanes as part of Caltrans undercrossing improvement.

Included in the MTC Regional Active Transportation Network and is on a Caltrans facility.

Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 N/A
204 North Street and Venezia Way Crossing improvement to raise the existing crosswalk and/or install RRFB. Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A
Note: Projects highlighted in blue are on Caltrans right of way. 103
Project # Project Location Project Description Priority Persistent
Poverty
as
defined by
the IIJA
CA SB
535
MTC's Equity
Priority
Communitie
s
White House
Council on
Environmental
Quality's (CEQ)
Climate and
Economic
Justice
Screening
(CEJST)
USDOT
Equitable
Transportatio
n Community
(ETC)
Explorer
Bike
Projects
within 1
Mile of a
school
Pedestrian
Projects
within 1/2
mile of a
school
Along the
High Injury
Network
Along the
SCTA
Regional
Route
Network
Along the
MTC Active
Transportati
on Corridors
Network
Within
Transit
Priority
Areas
Low-Stress
Facility within
Priority
Development
Area
Within 1/4
mile of a bus
stop
Project
identified as
part of the
Long Range
Safety Plan
37 South Cloverdale Boulevard from West St to Citrus Fair Dr Flatten sidewalk on east side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 45 Asti Road from Citrus Fair Drive to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 51 Costal Plywood Timber Company Road from Asti Road to city limits Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 60 Asti Road from Citrus Fair Drive to Citrus Fair Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 61 Asti Road from Lake Street to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 66 Citrus Fair Drive from South Washington Street to Citrus Fair Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 67 Hazelden Road from East 1st Street to Hazelden Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 73 South Cloverdale Boulevard from South Franklin Street to Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 75 East Street from Lake Street to Railroad Avenue Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 91 South Street from Clark Avenue to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 98 Asti Road from East 1st Street to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 118 Railroad Avenue from East Street to Railroad Avenue Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 128 Railroad Avenue from East Street to Railroad Avenue Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 136 Lake Street from Live Oak Lane to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 138 East 1st Street from Hazelden Road to Redwood Highway Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 140 Lake Street from East Street to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 142 Mulberry Drive from Lake Street to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 145 East 1st Street from Asti Road to Redwood Highway Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 153 Hazelden Road from East 1st Street to Hazelden Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 156 Lake Street from East Street to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 157 Asti Road from Lake Street to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 166 Railroad Avenue from East Street to Railroad Avenue Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 171 Sherwood Circle from Ottoboni Drive to Sherwood Circle Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 182 Asti Road from Citrus Fair Drive to Citrus Fair Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 187 South Street from Clark Avenue to South Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 34 Cloverdale Blvd from East Cherry Creek Rd to Hillview Dr Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalks facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 40 Vista View Drive from King Ridge Road to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 42 Asti Road from Citrus Fair Drive to Citrus Fair Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 46 Vista View Drive from Stameroff Court to King Ridge Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 49 Middlestad Lane from North Cloverdale Boulevard to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 52 North Cloverdale Boulevard from Vista View Drive to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 54 Asti Road from Santana Drive to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 58 Cherry Creek Road from S. Foothill Boulevard to Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 59 Oakbrook Lane from North East Street to Oakbrook Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 72 East Cherry Creek Road from Tarman Drive to Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 85 University Street from North Cloverdale Boulevard to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 90 Shahan Drive from Grace Court to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 94 South Washington Street from Citrus Fair Drive to West 1st Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 95 North Cloverdale Boulevard from Middlestad Lane to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 96 Kay Court from Heidi Lane to Kay Court Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 99 Live Oak Lane from Lake Street to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 102 Orange Drive from Orange Drive to East 2nd Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 105 Triplett Drive from North Main Street to Triplett Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 116 Vista View Drive from Stameroff Court to North Main Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 119 Stameroff Court from Vista View Drive to Stameroff Court Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 120 Orange Drive from Orange Drive to East 2nd Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 121 Grace Court from Shahan Drive to Shahan Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 129 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Hillview Drive to Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 130 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Hillview Drive to Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 139 Vista View Drive from Stameroff Court to North Main Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 147 Lake Street from Evergreen Lane to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 149 Shahan Drive from Heidi Lane to Shahan Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 150 South Washington Street from Citrus Fair Drive to Citrus Fair Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 154 Heidi Lane from Shahan Drive to Kay Court Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 161 North Cloverdale Boulevard from Shahan Drive to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 163 University Street from North Cloverdale Boulevard to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 164 Shahan Drive from Heidi Lane to Shahan Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 168 Tarman Drive from East Cherry Creek Road to East Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 175 Shahan Drive from Heidi Lane to Shahan Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 176 Oakbrook Lane from Oakbrook Lane to Oakbrook Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 178 University Street from North Cloverdale Boulevard to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 183 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Hillview Drive to Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 188 Oakbrook Lane from Oakbrook Lane to Oakbrook Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 39 East 1st St from Asti Rd to city limits (to the east) Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 41 Asti Road from Santana Drive to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 43 Shady Lane from S. Foothill Boulevard to Shady Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A Cloverdale Sidewalk Gap Projects Prioritization Criteria 104
Project # Project Location Project Description Priority Persistent
Poverty
as
defined by
the IIJA
CA SB
535
MTC's Equity
Priority
Communitie
s
White House
Council on
Environmental
Quality's (CEQ)
Climate and
Economic
Justice
Screening
(CEJST)
USDOT
Equitable
Transportatio
n Community
(ETC)
Explorer
Bike
Projects
within 1
Mile of a
school
Pedestrian
Projects
within 1/2
mile of a
school
Along the
High Injury
Network
Along the
SCTA
Regional
Route
Network
Along the
MTC Active
Transportati
on Corridors
Network
Within
Transit
Priority
Areas
Low-Stress
Facility within
Priority
Development
Area
Within 1/4
mile of a bus
stop
Project
identified as
part of the
Long Range
Safety Plan
44 Santana Drive from Asti Road to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 47 Sandholm Drive from S. Foothill Boulevard to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 48 Kelly Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 50 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Sandholm Drive to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 53 Sonoma Drive from Clover Springs Drive to Sonoma Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 55 King Ridge Road from Vista View Drive to King Ridge Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 56 Chelsea Circle from Chelsea Circle to Chelsea Circle Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 57 Cherry Creek Road from Cherry Creek Ct to Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 62 Cherry Creek Court from Cherry Creek Road to Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 63 Sherwood Circle from Sherwood Circle to Sherwood Circle Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 64 Evergreen Lane from Lake Street to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 N/A 65 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Elbridge Avenue to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 68 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Sandholm Drive to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 69 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Church Lane to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 70 Hillside Drive from Kerry Lane to School Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 71 Cherry Creek Road from South Foothill Boulevard to Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 74 Champlain Avenue from Washington Street to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 76 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Sandholm Drive to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 77 Lake Street from Evergreen Lane to Lake Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 N/A 78 Airport Road adjacent to southern city extent Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 79 Cherry Creek Court from Cherry Creek Road to Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 80 North Street from Venezia Way to North Jefferson Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 81 Josephine Drive from North Foothill Boulevard to Josephine Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 82 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Elbridge Avenue to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 83 Ranch House Drive from Elbridge Avenue to Cottage Court Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 84 Haehl Street from Silva Drive to Haehl Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 86 Elbridge Avenue from South Cloverdale Boulevard to Maguerite Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 87 Clovercrest Drive from Oak Lane to Clovercrest Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 88 Toscana Circle from Milan Court to Portofino Way Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 89 East 1st Street from Asti Road to Crocker Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 92 Block Drive from Oak Lane to Clovercrest Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 93 North Foothill Boulevard from West 2nd Street to West 2nd Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 97 North Cloverdale Boulevard from Oat Valley Road to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 100 West 2nd Street from North Foothill Boulevard to West 2nd Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 101 North Street from Venezia Way to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 103 Kerry Lane from Hillside Drive to Kerry Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 104 Charles Street from School Street to Haehl Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 106 Santana Drive from Asti Road to Santana Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 107 Silva Drive from School Street to Haehl Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 108 Santana Drive from South Cloverdale Boulevard to Santana Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 109 Ranch House Drive from S. Foothill Boulevard to Homewood Court Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 110 Butler Court from North Jefferson Street to North Jefferson Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 111 Hillside Drive from Hillside Court to Kerry Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 112 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Santana Drive to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 113 Ranch House Drive from Cottage Court to Homewood Court Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 114 Crocker Road from East 1st Street to Crocker Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 115 Shady Lane from Hot Springs Rd to Shady Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 117 School Street from Charles Street to North Jefferson Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 122 Hillside Court from Hillside Drive to Hillside Court Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 123 Santana Drive from South Cloverdale Boulevard to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 124 Treadway Drive from Furber Lane to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 125 Northstar Lane from Moonlight Circle to Northstar Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 126 Elbridge Avenue from S. Foothill Boulevard to Ranch House Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 127 Milan Court from Toscana Circle to Milan Court Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 131 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Sandholm Drive to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 132 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Sandholm Drive to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 133 Elbridge Avenue from Ranch House Drive to Ranch House Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 134 Santana Drive from Asti Road to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 135 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Church Lane to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 137 Clovercrest Drive from Oak Lane to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 141 Santana Drive from Santana Drive to Santana Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 143 4th Street from Josephine Drive to 4th Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 144 North Cloverdale Boulevard from Oat Valley Road to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 146 Oak Lane from Block Drive to Clovercrest Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 148 Moonlight Circle from Polaris Court to Sunrise Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 151 Santana Drive from Asti Road to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 152 Oak Lane from Block Drive to Oak Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 155 Commercial Street from West 1st Street to West 1st Street Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 158 School Street from Hillside Drive to Silva Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 105
Project # Project Location Project Description Priority Persistent
Poverty
as
defined by
the IIJA
CA SB
535
MTC's Equity
Priority
Communitie
s
White House
Council on
Environmental
Quality's (CEQ)
Climate and
Economic
Justice
Screening
(CEJST)
USDOT
Equitable
Transportatio
n Community
(ETC)
Explorer
Bike
Projects
within 1
Mile of a
school
Pedestrian
Projects
within 1/2
mile of a
school
Along the
High Injury
Network
Along the
SCTA
Regional
Route
Network
Along the
MTC Active
Transportati
on Corridors
Network
Within
Transit
Priority
Areas
Low-Stress
Facility within
Priority
Development
Area
Within 1/4
mile of a bus
stop
Project
identified as
part of the
Long Range
Safety Plan
159 School Street from North Foothill Boulevard to Silva Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 160 Hillside Drive from Hillside Court to Kerry Lane Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 162 Santana Drive from Santana Drive to Santana Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 165 Oat Valley Road from North Cloverdale Boulevard to North Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 167 South Cloverdale Boulevard from Santana Drive to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 169 Sherwood Circle from Sherwood Circle to Sherwood Circle Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 170 Chelsea Circle from Ottoboni Drive to Chelsea Circle Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 172 East 1st Street from Redwood Highway to Redwood Highway Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 173 Chelsea Circle from Chelsea Circle to Chelsea Circle Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 174 Santana Drive from Redwood Highway to Santana Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 177 Santana Drive from Redwood Highway to Santana Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 179 Clovercrest Drive from Block Drive to Clovercrest Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 180 River Lane north of Berti Lane within city limits Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 181 Hillside Court from Hillside Court to Hillside Court Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 184 Santana Drive from Redwood Highway to Santana Drive Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 185 Hillside Court from Hillside Court to Hillside Court Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 186 Cherry Creek Road from S. Foothill Boulevard to Cherry Creek Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, existing sidewalk facilities on one side Tier 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 189 Asti Road from Santana Drive to Asti Road Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 190 Church Lane from South Cloverdale Boulevard to South Cloverdale Boulevard Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 N/A 191 1st Street immediately east of Mulberry Street about 250 feet long Sidewalk Gap Closure, no existing sidewalk facilities Tier 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A 106
Agenda
1 Purpose & Process
2 Updates Since October 2024
Presentation to City Council
3 Overview of ATP Content
4 Questions
City of Cloverdale
Active Transportation Plan
Cloverdale City Council
January 22, 2025 107
Creating spaces for people to walk, bike, and roll that are low-stress and lower risk to create more opportunities for more people to walk, bike, and roll.

All Ages & Abilities
Regional Connection
Purpose of Plan Update
Implementation
Identifying and planning regional routes between jurisdictions as part of the larger Countywide ATP.

Prioritizing projects and identifying funding to focus and streamline implementation.
108
Process Scope of Work
Task 1:

Establishing
Foundation
Task 3:

Engagement &
Coordination
Task 4:

Projects &
Programs
Task 5:

Funding &
Implementation
Task 2:

Technical
Analysis
Task 6:

Draft &
Final Plans
Task 7:

Board Review
& Approval
Sonoma Countywide
Active Transportation
Plan
Local Plans:
• Cloverdale
• Cotati
• Healdsburg
• Rohnert Park
• Sebastopol
• Sonoma
• Unincorporated
County
109
Outreach
Summary
• Pop-up Events: Farmers Market in November 2023
& Fire and Earthquake Safety Expo in May 2024
• Online Web Map and Survey: Fall 2023 & Spring 2024
• Public Workshop: June 2024 at Performing Arts Center
• Draft ATP Review: Fall 2024
City staff and project team hosting an open house at the Cloverdale Performing Arts Center 110
Cloverdale
ATP
Updates since
October 2024
Presentation
Following edits were made based on input
received on the Draft Active Transportation Plan:
• Extended project on Cloverdale Boulevard and updated
project description to indicate potential enhancements
to the project.
• Extended project on Jefferson Street to provide
connection to the elementary school.
• Added crossing improvement at North/Veneiza Way to
improve access to elementary school.
• Updated projects connecting to North Foothill to be
multiuse paths.
• Provided additional information related to specific steps City staff can take to implement the Plan.
• Provided additional information regarding funding.
• Provided additional appendix showing more details for project prioritization.
111
Overview of ATP Content
112

VISION STATEMENT
.

Our guiding principles are to improve safety,
connectivity, equity, and quality of life.

Walking, biking, and rolling shall be safe and
appealing modes for people of all ages and
abilities to use for everyday transportation and
recreation.
113
Deliver a continuous active transportation network that links daily activities and housing, and that allows people of all ages and abilities to use a variety of transportation types easily, affordably, and dependably.

Connected and Reliable
Create and sustain a high-quality and low-stress active transportation network.

Employ Vision Zero and Safety Plan policies and strategies to advance this goal.

Safe and WellMaintained

PLAN GOALS AND DESCRIPTIONS
Tailor projects to the surrounding community contexts and user profiles.

Support a diversity of uses and users and create community through active transportation programs and policies that prioritize walking, biking, and rolling.

Community Oriented
and Place-Based
114
Proposed Bikeway
& Corridor Projects
Cloverdale
ATP
115
Cloverdale
ATP
Sidewalk Improvements
116
Cloverdale
ATP
Existing & Proposed
Active Transportation
Network
117
Cloverdale
ATP
Policies
Organized to support each of the three goals.

Generally, include the following types of topics:
• Coordination with other public agencies
• Application of industry best practices and required
standards
• Enhancing safety consistent with the LRSP and SCTA’s
Vision Zero Action Plan
• Facilitating implementation through CIP, private
development, other opportunities
• Maintaining existing and newly built facilities
• Broadening access to walking and biking facilities for all ages and abilities
• Supporting education and encouragement programs
and activities
118
Implementation
Funding: Regional &
State Sources
Cloverdale
ATP
Regional Funding Sources
GoSonoma https://scta.ca.gov/measure-m/gosonoma/
Transportation Development Act, Article 3
(TDA3) https://scta.ca.gov/projects/funding/#tda3
State of California Funding Sources
AHSC – Affordable Housing and Sustainable
Communities https://sgc.ca.gov/programs/ahsc/
ATP – Active Transportation Program https://catc.ca.gov/programs/activetransportation-program CleanCA – Clean California https://cleancalifornia.dot.ca.gov/ HSIP – Local Highway Safety Improvement
Program
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/localassistance/fed-and-state-programs/highwaysafety-improvement-program LPP – Local Partnership Program https://catc.ca.gov/programs/sb1/localpartnership-program PROTECT – Promoting Resilient Operations
for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-Saving
Transportation
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/localassistance/fed-and-stateprograms/protect REAP – Regional Early Action Planning
https://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-andfunding/programs-active/regional-early-actionplanning-grants-of-2021 RC:H2B – Reconnecting Communities:

Highways to Boulevards
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/localassistance/fed-and-state-programs/rc-h2b RMRA & HUTA – Road Maintenance and
Rehabilitation Account & Highway Users Tax
Account
https://www.sco.ca.gov/aud_road_maintenance
_sb1.html
SCCP – Solutions for Congested Corridors
Program
https://catc.ca.gov/programs/sb1/solutionsfor-congested-corridors-program 119 Implementation
Monitoring
Cloverdale
ATP
Measures Baseline Data Source Frequency
Goal: Connected &
Reliable

Miles of bikeway facilities
(total) 10.25 miles City data Annual
Linear feet of sidewalk
gaps (total) 63,807 feet City data Annual
Goal: Safe & WellMaintained

KSI pedestrian and bike
involved collisions with
goal those are zero
Ped: 1/Bike: 0 2015-2019; SWITRS Annual
Number of crossing
improvements installed n/a City data Annual
Goal: Community
Oriented & Place Based

Number of active
transportation
improvements within a
1/4 mile of transit/bus
stop
n/a City data Annual
Number of new or
upgraded bike parking
facilities
n/a City data Annual
120
Questions?
121
From: Emily Shartin
To: City Council
Cc: Public Comments
Subject: SCBC letter re: Cloverdale Active Transportation Plan Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2025 1:23:35 PM
Attachments: image001.png
Letter to Cloverdale CC 012225 re ATP.pdf
January 22, 2025
Cloverdale City Council
124 N. Cloverdale Blvd.

Cloverdale, CA 95425
Dear Mayor Lands and Members of the Cloverdale City Council, The Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition supports Cloverdale’s updated draft Active Transportation Plan and would like to share a few comments as the city looks toward building out its bike and pedestrian network.

Overall, SCBC believes it is critical to improve cyclists’ accessibility to Cloverdale Boulevard, the city’s main route for getting to schools, local businesses and services. It has many uses and users, and all projects improving access to or on Cloverdale Boulevard should be considered a priority. We are happy to see separated bike lanes recommended for the segment of Cloverdale Boulevard south of First Street, and also pleased to see bike lanes extended north to the city limits. We are disappointed that the segment just north of First Street continues to be designated as a bike route with no bike lanes. In the absence of actual bike lanes on Cloverdale Boulevard, we support the timely installation of bike facilities on streets such as Main, Washington, Commercial and Jefferson to create parallel, connected routes.

We also appreciate that the revised plan includes stronger connections around Jefferson Elementary School, which participates in our Safe Routes to School program.

As we have said before, although Bike Boulevards aren’t typically a facility that SCBC endorses, we understand they might be the only option in some instances. We ask the city to carefully consider the traffic calming elements that can make Bike Boulevards more effective, and to understand that they involve more than applying sharrows to the road.

Lastly, of course this is only a plan, and the critical thing is what happens next – actually building out the network in a timely way. We know that many communities are asking questions about the cost of implementing these plans and where to find funding. We urge the city to prioritize quick build projects, which allow the community to test certain types of bike lanes or other infrastructure before they become permanent. Quick builds also enable the community to start building out the network sooner rather later.

Thank you for your consideration.

Emily Shartin, Outreach and Advocacy Manager
Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition
[email protected]
707-545-0153 office
https://www.bikesonoma.org/
122
January 22, 2025
Cloverdale City Council
124 N. Cloverdale Blvd.

Cloverdale, CA 95425
Dear Mayor Lands and Members of the Cloverdale City Council, The Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition supports Cloverdale’s updated draft Active Transportation Plan and would like to share a few comments as the city looks toward building out its bike and pedestrian network.

Overall, SCBC believes it is critical to improve cyclists’ accessibility to Cloverdale Boulevard, the city’s main route for getting to schools, local businesses and services. It has many uses and users, and all projects improving access to or on Cloverdale Boulevard should be considered a priority.

We are happy to see separated bike lanes recommended for the segment of Cloverdale Boulevard south of First Street, and also pleased to see bike lanes extended north to the city limits. We are disappointed that the segment just north of First Street continues to be designated as a bike route with no bike lanes. In the absence of actual bike lanes on Cloverdale Boulevard, we support the timely installation of bike facilities on streets such as Main, Washington, Commercial and Jefferson to create parallel, connected routes.

We also appreciate that the revised plan includes stronger connections around Jefferson Elementary School, which participates in our Safe Routes to School program.

As we have said before, although Bike Boulevards aren’t typically a facility that SCBC endorses, we understand they might be the only option in some instances.

We ask the city to carefully consider the traffic calming elements that can make Bike Boulevards more effective, and to understand that they involve more than applying sharrows to the road.

Lastly, of course this is only a plan, and the critical thing is what happens next – actually building out the network in a timely way. We know that many communities are asking questions about the cost of implementing these plans and where to find funding. We urge the city to prioritize quick build projects, which allow the community to test certain types of bike lanes or other infrastructure before they become permanent. Quick builds also enable the community to start building out the network sooner rather later.
123
Thank you for your consideration.

Emily Shartin
Outreach and Advocacy Manager
124
City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item: F.2
Meeting Date: January 22, 2025
Agenda Section:

Consent
Staff Contact:

Kevin Thompson, Assistant City Manager / Comm. Dev. Dir.

Hector Galvan, Parks Superintendent
Agenda Item Title:

Consider Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Miracle PlaySystems for the Procurement and Installation of new playground equipment at Furber Park in amount of $269,244.56.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):

Adopt A Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City of Council of the City of Cloverdale approving a purchase agreement and minor construction agreement with Miracle Play Systems in the amount of $269,244.56 for the purchase and installation of playground equipment and authorizing the city manager to execute said agreement.”
________________________________________________________________________________________ Background /Summary
The Furber play equipment needs replacement:
• The Furber Park playground equipment was first installed over 20 years ago. • The equipment is at the end of its useful life and needs replacement. • Replacement parts are not available for the current equipment, making it difficult for staff to keep it maintained.
• Replacement of the playground equipment was identified as a high priority in a city-wide survey regarding Furber Park conducted in 2024.

The attached quote for $269,244.56 includes the installation of new equipment and the removal of the old.

Parks staff was able to save approximately $10,000 by completing the offloading process in-house. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Options:

1. Reject the Resolution; or

2. Provide alternative direction to City staff.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:

The Public Works Subcommittee recommended that the Council support the purchase of new playground equipment at two separate meetings in 2024.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:

The project will be funded using park impact fees, with a current balance of $576,481. Approval will reduce the balance to $307,237.
125
City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: January 22, 2025

________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Cost Estimate
126

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING A PURCHASE

AGREEMENT AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS IN THE AMOUNT OF $269,244.56 FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the playground equipment at Furber Park is 20 years old and past its useful life; and WHEREAS, replacement parts are not available for the current equipment, making it difficult for staff to keep it maintained; and
WHEREAS, to further these efforts, the parks department is seeking to purchase new playground equipment; and
WHEREAS, replacement of the playground equipment was identified as a high priority in a city-wide survey regarding Furber Park conducted in 2024; and

WHEREAS, Park Impact fees are available to use for this project and will leave an estimated fund balance of approximately $307,237; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cloverdale hereby:

1. Approves a Purchase Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A with Miracle PlaySystems for new playground equipment at Furber Park;

2. Approves a total project budget in an amount not to exceed $269,244.56;

3. Authorizes the City Manager to execute said purchases and use Park Impact fees, that were budgeted in City’s Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget, to cover the cost associated with the Playground Equipment
The foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on the 22nd day of January 2025 by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: (0)
Noes: (0)
Abstain: (0)

Absent: (0)
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
______________________ ______________________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A - Plans and Cost Estimate
127
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS. DESIGNING PLAY
Creating Fun Play Environments to Enrich Communities
Furber Park Playground
Cloverdale, CA
Prepared for: City of Cloverdale
128
129
Dark Gray
Decks Cobalt Tropical
Yellow Gray Silver
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS. DESIGNING PLAY
Creating Fun Play Environments to Enrich Communities
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS. DESIGNING PLAY
Creating Fun Play Environments to Enrich Communities 1/14/2025 22_1534_FurberPlayground_004
Colors Used In Rendering: *Colors shown in rendering are for illustrative purposes only. Actual color and pattern may vary slightly. 130
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS. DESIGNING PLAY
Creating Fun Play Environments to Enrich Communities
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS. DESIGNING PLAY
Creating Fun Play Environments to Enrich Communities 1/14/2025 22_1534_FurberPlayground_004
*Colors shown in rendering are for illustrative purposes only. Actual color and pattern may vary slightly. 131
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS. DESIGNING PLAY
Creating Fun Play Environments to Enrich Communities
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS. DESIGNING PLAY
Creating Fun Play Environments to Enrich Communities 1/14/2025 22_1534_FurberPlayground_004
*Colors shown in rendering are for illustrative purposes only. Actual color and pattern may vary slightly. 132
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS. DESIGNING PLAY
Creating Fun Play Environments to Enrich Communities
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS. DESIGNING PLAY
Creating Fun Play Environments to Enrich Communities 1/14/2025 22_1534_FurberPlayground_004
*Colors shown in rendering are for illustrative purposes only. Actual color and pattern may vary slightly. 133
1/14/2025
Furber Park Playground
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS, INC. – 2443 FILLMORE STREET #380-2302, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 (800) 879-7730 – (510) 893-2163 (FAX)
CSL: 981433 – DIR: 1000015853

Job Number: 22-1534
Job: Furber Park Playground
Quote Name: Quote-22-1534-Furber Park Playground_004
Quote Number: Q-09958
Prepared by:

Shana Friesen
[email protected]
Terms: Equipment With Install: 50% due upon order. Installation: 25% deposit required at the time of equipment order, remainder due net 30 days after completion Remit to: Miracle Playsystems, Inc.
1276 S Main St., Salinas, CA 93901
Sub Total: $248,296.34
Freight: $10,464.00
Estimated Tax: $10,484.22
Total: $269,244.56
Miracle Includes Sourcewell Discount (Contract #010521-LTS) Product
Code
Description Qty Rate Total Estimated Tax ( if
applicable)
MREC EQUIP Miracle Play Equipment Per
Plan_22_1534_FurberPark_004_BOM
1 $131,677.00 $101,391.29 $9,125.22
Installation Services Equipment Installation
Prevailing Wages Applied
Product Code Description Qty Rate Total Estimated Tax ( if applicable)
B15 Installation Only Of Miracle Play Structures Per Plan 22_1534_FurberParkPlayground_004
1 $85,590.05 $85,590.05 $0.00
Installation Services Demo & Removal of Existing Equipment Prevailing Wages Applied
Product
Code
Description Qty Rate Total Estimated Tax ( if
applicable)
B11 Removal & Disposal of Existing 5-12 Play Structure and Swing 1 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $0.00 Installation Services Site Preparation
Prevailing Wages Applied
Product
Code
Description Qty Rate Total Estimated Tax ( if
applicable)
A1 Provide Approx. 425 LF Temporary Construction Security Fencing to Close Off Work Site for Duration of Project.
1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $225.00
B03 Remove & Stockpile 12" Existing EWF From Both Play Areas 3,037 SF & 2,511 SF
1 $4,600.00 $4,600.00 $0.00
B13 Transportation of Play Equipment From Corp Yard To Project Once Ready for Installation
1 $8,233.00 $8,233.00 $0.00
B14 Provide Labor and Materials to Pour (2) ADA Concrete Access Ramp with Side Aprons.
2 $5,700.00 $11,400.00 $1,026.00
134
1/14/2025
Furber Park Playground
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS, INC. – 2443 FILLMORE STREET #380-2302, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 (800) 879-7730 – (510) 893-2163 (FAX)
CSL: 981433 – DIR: 1000015853

C17 Provide Labor and Equipment to Re-Install Approx. 267 CY of Stockpiled Wood Chips.
1 $4,600.00 $4,600.00 $0.00
Wood Fiber Surfacing
Engineered Wood Fiber Surfacing
Prevailing Wages Applied
Site Must be Accessible for a 65' Long by 14' High Tractor Trailer.

Bark Installation Must be Within 275 ft of Truck. Additional Charges Will Apply for Distances Greater Than 275 ft.

Product
Code
Description Qty Rate Total Estimated Tax ( if
applicable)
C16 CedarSafe Certified Engineered Playground Fiber Apx. 60 CY To Top Off Apx.3" of Wood Fiber Depth at Two Existing Play Boxes, Across Apx. 5,548 SF Total.
60 $20.00 $1,200.00 $108.00
C17 Wood Fiber Surfacing Install Only
Blown In, Apx. 60 CY, Includes Clean Up of Overspray
60 $38.00 $2,280.00 $0.00
CPSI Inspection
Product
Code
Description Qty Rate Total Estimated Tax ( if
applicable)
B22 CPSI Inspection with Report (Per Structure). 2 $1,251.00 $2,502.00 $0.00 Sub Total: $248,296.34
Freight: $10,464.00
Total Estimated Tax: $10,484.22
Grand Total: $269,244.56
Company: ________________________________________
Signature: ________________________________________
Name: ___________________________________________
Date: ____________________________________________
135
1/14/2025
Furber Park Playground
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS, INC. – 2443 FILLMORE STREET #380-2302, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 (800) 879-7730 – (510) 893-2163 (FAX)
CSL: 981433 – DIR: 1000015853

Please confirm or edit order information below.

End User Company:

City of Cloverdale
End User Contact:

End User Email:

Delivery Contact:

Delivery Email:

Delivery Phone:

Delivery Address:

Site Address:
298 Elbridge Ave
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Bill To Email:

Bill To:

City of Clovedale
Customer Reference #:

INDEMNITY
Client/Owner shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Miracle Playsystems, its officers, directors, board of trustees, agents, or employees and each of them, from any and all claims, demands, causes of action in law or in equity, damages, penalties, costs, expenses, reasonable attorneys’ fees, reasonable experts’ fees, reasonable consultants’ fees, judgments, losses or liabilities, of every kind and nature whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with or incidental to, the performance of the services under this Agreement or any of the obligations contained in this Agreement (“Claims”). Without limitation, “damages” include personal injury, including, but not limited to bodily injury, emotional injury, sickness or disease, or death to persons, including, but not limited to, any employees or agents of Miracle Playsystems, or any other person; or other damages of any kind to anyone including, without limitation, economic loss, property damage and loss of use thereof. It is expressly acknowledged and agreed that each of the foregoing indemnities is independent, that each shall be given effect, and that each shall apply despite any acts or omissions, misconduct or negligent conduct, whether active or passive, on the part of, or other contractor(s); provided, however, Miracle Playsystems duty to indemnify shall be limited to the percentage or the degree Miracle Playsystems comparative negligence caused any damages.

STANDARD NOTES
• Price quotation is good for 30 days. Accurate color selections must be made in writing prior to equipment going into production. Colors to be confirmed with your local sales representative.
• Please email/fax quotation with your signature to accept this quote and place order. Fax 510-893-2163 or email [email protected] • Unless otherwise specified, Miracle Playsystems DOES NOT include the following in this proposal:
• Engineered drawings
• Installation of equipment or other site amenities
• Specialty trades, equipment, power supply required to install equipment • Any insurance requiring in excess of $1M/$2M per occurrence, special insurance coverage or wording, Prevailing/Certified wage rates, local permitting, bid/performance bonds, temp fencing, geo tech surveys, playground safety inspection, equipment offload, and testing services. • Inspect equipment upon delivery. Color discrepancy must be reported at time of delivery. Installation constitutes acceptance of colors. • Warranty does not cover labor for reinstallation.

TERMS & CONDITIONS
• Purchase contract terms & conditions of sale: The client/customer’s acceptance and understanding of these terms & conditions and all other supporting documentation provided as part of this package is evidenced by signing of this estimate/quote. • Payment terms: Standard terms (on approved credit), unless otherwise noted are Equipment: 50% due upon order, 50% due net 30 days after ship date, subject to approval by Miracle Playsystems Credit Manager. Equipment shall be invoiced separately from other services and shall be payable in advance of those services and project completion. Installation Services: 25% deposit is required at the time of equipment order, balance of the installation will be billed upon completion, due net 30 days. 136
1/14/2025
Furber Park Playground
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS, INC. – 2443 FILLMORE STREET #380-2302, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 (800) 879-7730 – (510) 893-2163 (FAX)
CSL: 981433 – DIR: 1000015853

Retainage not accepted. Should any changes be required to the products after order is placed, modifications or changes will be at client/customers expense. Miracle Playsystems maintains a no return policy and asks all clients to determine feature, layout and color selection prior to ordering. Should any order be cancelled after production has started a 30% restocking fee will be charged to client. Credit card convenience fee is 3.5% which will be added to all credit card charges. • Lead times: Estimated lead times for the time the order is released into production until it is delivered will vary. • Lead times may currently be extended due to reasons such as supply chain issues, shipping delays, raw material shortages, and other COVID-19 related impacts. • Custom play feature lead times are determined on a case by case basis.

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES (if applicable)
Unless otherwise noted, we exclude responsibility for material delivery & offloading equipment, removal & disposal of packaging accumulated by equipment packaging, project security, landscape & hardscape repair based on access route to site, delays or returns due to layout conflicts or delay of other trades, removal of spoils from job site, locating underground: utilities, pipes, obstructions in work area, conditions unforeseen and/or not disclosed at time of estimate, permits, engineering, material testing, soil samples, CPSI. Conditions: Grades; stable, compacted & workable with 95% compaction and less than 1% grade, adequate access to site for labor, materials, tools and equipment. Estimate good for 30 days from quote or Dec. 31 of current calendar year, whichever comes first. Terms: Upon completion.

GENERAL TERMS
• THIS QUOTE IS LIMITED TO AND GOVERNED BY THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN: Miracle Playsystems objects to any other terms proposed by client, in writing or otherwise, as material alterations, and all such proposed terms shall be void. Client authorizes Miracle Playsystems to ship equipment and agrees to pay the total specified. Shipping terms are FOB the place of shipment via common carrier. • Client and owner/operator agree to indemnify and hold Miracle Playsystems, harmless from and against all liabilities, losses, penalties, damages and expenses, including costs and attorney fees, resulting from any and all claims, liens, damages, actions, suits, judgments or settlements, injuries arising or alleged to arise out of their failure, or failure of architect, contractors, subcontractors, installers, employees, agents and assigns to assemble, install, inspect and/or maintain the play equipment and impact absorbing surfacing in full compliance with each manufacturers installation instructions and safety requirements and their misuse and/or alteration of the play equipment.

Company: ______________________________________
Signature: ______________________________________
Name: ______________________________________
Date: ______________________________________
137
MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS. DESIGNING PLAY
Creating Fun Play Environments to Enrich Communities
Presented by your Miracle Team
Thank you for your consideration!
Shana Friesen
Sales Account Manager
Miracle Playsystems Inc
[email protected]
(510) 514-5212
Claudia Gutierrez
Designer
Miracle Playsystems Inc
[email protected]
(510) 775-4476
Stephanie Rodriguez
Inside Account Manager
Miracle Playsystems Inc
[email protected]
(510 .306-8756
138
City Council/Successor
Agency
Agenda Item Summary
Agenda Item:

Meeting Date:

F.3
January 22, 2025
Agenda Section:

Consent
Staff Contact:

Vanessa Apodaca, City Engineer
Susie Holmes, Finance Director
Agenda Item Title:

Appointing the Engineer of Record for the Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2025-26
________________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):

Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale appointing Coastland Civil Engineering to serve as the Engineer of Work for the City of Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District and Directing the preparation and filing of the Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-26 (Pursuant To The Landscaping And Lighting Act Of 1972).” ________________________________________________________________________________________ Background:

The Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (“District”) was initially formed by the City in 1997 in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“Landscaping and Lighting Act”) to pay for costs associated with maintaining landscaping and maintenance in the creek area associated with Jefferson Springs IV Subdivision (Zone 1). Additional zones have been annexed into the District over time and there are currently a total of seven zones in the District.

The Landscaping and Lighting Act requires that the City undertake certain proceedings for any fiscal year in which assessments are to be levied and collected. These proceedings are typically accomplished at three separate Council meetings with the following actions:
1) Adopt a resolution appointing the Engineer of Work and directing the preparation of the annual Engineer’s Report.
2) Approve the Preliminary Engineer’s Report, declare the City Council’s intent to levy assessments and set a date for a public hearing.
3) Conduct a public hearing, approve the Final Engineer’s Report and authorize the levying and collection of assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary:

The Engineer’s Report will analyze the anticipated FY 2025-26 costs for each zone in the District and determine the corresponding assessment amounts. The City Council can make changes to the Engineer’s Report once it has been prepared and filed. There are no annexations to the District anticipated for FY 2025-26. The attached resolution appoints Coastland Civil Engineering to service as the Engineer of Work, which begins the proceedings for the 2025-26 Fiscal Year. 139
City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: January 25, 2023
Item No. E.1

The City Council has appointed Coastland Civil Engineering as the Engineer of Work for these proceedings since 1997 and they have demonstrated the expertise necessary to perform the work. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Options:

1. Reject recommended resolution

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:

None
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:

All costs associated with these annual proceedings, the annual operation, maintenance and administration of the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District are recovered from the annual assessments levied on the properties within the District. The proposal for preparation of the FY 2025-26 Engineer’s Report is in the amount of $18,185.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Engineering Proposal
140

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE APPOINTING COASTLAND CIVIL

ENGINEERING AS THE ENGINEER OF WORK FOR THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND

LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND DIRECTING THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
(PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972)
WHEREAS, the City Council ordered the formation of the Assessment District during September 1997 to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council must annually appoint the Engineer of Work and direct the preparation and filing of the annual Engineer’s Report to levy and collect assessments on any following fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that there will be no annexations into the Assessment District in FY 2025-26; and WHEREAS, Coastland Civil Engineering has demonstrated the expertise necessary to prepare the annual Engineer’s Report.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cloverdale does hereby:

1. Appoint Coastland Civil Engineering as the Engineer of Work for the City of Cloverdale’s Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District; and

2. Direct Coastland Civil Engineering to prepare and file the Annual Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-26 showing any changes, pursuant to Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Coastland Civil Engineering for the scope of work attached to and incorporated herein as Exhibit A in a form approved by the City Attorney.

It is hereby certified that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on this 22nd day of January 2025, by the following Roll Call vote:

AYES: (0)
NOES: (0) None
ABSTAIN: (0) None
ABSENT: (0) None
APPROVED: ATTEST:
______________________ ______________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Exhibit A - Coastland Civil Engineering Proposal
141
Santa Rosa Auburn Pleasant Hill Fairfield
1400 Neotomas Avenue 11641 Blocker Drive, Ste. 170 3478 Buskirk Avenue, Ste. 1000 420 Executive Court North, Ste. G Santa Rosa, CA 95405 Auburn, CA 95603 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Fairfield, CA 94534 Tel: 707.571.8005 Tel: 530.888.9929 Tel: 925.233.5333 Tel: 707.702.1961 www.coastland.dccm.com
December 19, 2024
Ms. Vanessa Apodaca
City Engineer
City of Cloverdale
124 N. Cloverdale Blvd.

Cloverdale, CA 95425
(Submitted via email to [email protected])
RE: Proposal for Assessment Engineering Services for FY 2025-26 Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Dear Vanessa,
We have prepared this letter proposal for assessment engineering work associated with the FY 2025-26 Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (District). As Coastland has been assisting the City with their assessment district engineer’s reports for over 20 years, we are very familiar with the requirements of the Government Code regulations and the City’s procedures.

Each year, State requirements must be met, the annual engineer’s report written noting any new zones or changes within existing zones, budgets must be established, fund balances must be calculated, and assessments must be determined. It is our understanding that there will be no annexations into the District for FY 2025-26. Accordingly, no public information meeting or balloting will be required.

Based on our understanding of your needs, the following is our proposed scope of work for FY 2025-26 to complete proceedings to levy and collect assessments:

SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 - Meet and Coordinate with City Staff
Both at the onset of our work, as well as throughout the proceedings, we anticipate meeting with City staff by phone to ensure full coordination of the project. In the initial meeting we will review the proposed timeline for the proceedings, detail the scope of activities and responsibilities, confirm there are no new subdivision annexations and provide the budget worksheets for the City staff to complete for those improvements to be financed by the district. We will coordinate with the City to help them address the necessary apportionment of general and special benefits for the maintained improvements within each zone. Coordination will be important both with the City 142
Proposal for City of Cloverdale for LLAD Assessment Engineering Services | Page 2 Council meetings and the timing of the Public Noticing as required by the provisions regulating the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Act).

Task 2 - Preparation of Agenda Reports and Resolutions for Three City Council Meetings In accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 of the Streets and Highways Code, the annual proceedings to levy and collect assessments typically require three separate City Council actions. We will prepare the draft agenda reports and resolutions for the three City Council meetings for the City’s review and comment. The resolutions for the second and third council meetings will be divided by Zone groupings, as specified by the City, to avoid Council member conflicts of interest. The final draft documents will be provided to the City electronically. We will meet the City Council agenda timeline as prescribed to us. Once the City approves each respective agenda report and resolutions, the City will complete the processing of the necessary approvals. The City will provide Coastland with electronic file copies and hard copies of the final agenda reports and final, signed resolutions after each of the three City Council meetings.

Task 3 - Background Information
During the development of the Engineer’s Report, we will need to gather all the appropriate background information. This information will be gathered primarily through the Public Works and Finance staff at the City and through the County of Sonoma Assessor’s Office. This collected information includes completed budget worksheets, clarification of land use changes of existing parcels based on Sonoma County Land Use codes, necessary assessor parcel information, internal City procedures or formats and any other pertinent information necessary for inclusion within the Engineer’s Report.

Task 4 – Budgets
Once the background information is collected, we will apply the budgets for each zone for maintaining District improvements. We apply the rational provided by the City for apportioning the percentage of general benefit verses the special benefits to the overall budgets for each zone so that only cost related to special benefits are applied to each zone’s budget and resulting assessments. The budget items will be shown in the City’s line-item budget format if desired, to allow easy comparison with City wide budgets and will separate maintenance costs from overhead costs for the upcoming fiscal year. We will use the methodology described in the previous year’s Engineer’s Report to equitably spread special benefit costs to each parcel within each Zone. The budgets in the Engineer’s Report will be shown in detail form along with a summary of fund balance for each Zone to provide as much information as possible. We understand the City may be holding public information meetings and that Coastland is not anticipated to be required at these meetings.

Task 5 – FY 2025-26 Engineer’s Report
The existing District maps (Assessment Diagrams) outlining those parcels included in the District will be revised as necessary. If required, the City will provide the CAD drawings of any final maps 143
Proposal for City of Cloverdale for LLAD Assessment Engineering Services | Page 3 outlining new parcels subdivided within the District for FY 2025-26. These drawings will be used to formulate the maps as required in the Engineer’s Report.

All the budgeting information as mentioned in Task 4 will be included within the Engineer’s Report, as well as background on the formation of the District, narrative description of the Zones, the improvements maintained within each Zone, a discussion of general benefits verses the special benefits conferred to the parcels within each Zone, any improvements or changes proposed within each Zone for FY 2025-26 and a listing of the specific assessment that will be levied on each of the parcels within the District. The Engineer’s Report will include all items as required in Sections 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code.

For the second City Council meeting, a draft Preliminary Engineer’s Report in electronic PDF form will be forwarded to the City for review and comment. Once finalized, two electronic PDFs of the signed Preliminary Engineer’s Report will be submitted to the City for preliminary approval, one including the spread of assessments, and one without. It is understood that no paper copies are required of the Preliminary Engineer’s Report. At the third City Council meeting (Public Hearing) two signed For Final Approval Engineer’s Report in PDF format will be forwarded to the City for distribution, one including the spread of assessments and one without. Once approved, three original signature bound copies of the Final Engineer’s Report will be sent for certifications, typically by the City Clerk. One signed copy is for the City Clerk’s files, one is for the Public Works/City Engineer and the other is to be returned for our files. Two pdfs of the final, signed Engineer’s Report will be forwarded to the City, one including the spread of assessments, and one without.

Task 6 – Preparation of Ballots
Because no annexations are anticipated, this task will not be required for FY 2025-26.

Task 7 – Public Information Meeting
Because no annexations are anticipated, this task will not be required for FY 2025-26.

Task 8 – City Council Meetings
At the first City Council meeting, the City appoints the engineer of work and directs the preparation and filing of the Engineer’s Report. Since this action is typically conducted as a consent item, our attendance is not typically required at this meeting. At the second City Council meeting, the annual Engineer’s Report is typically preliminarily approved. As requested in the past, we will attend this meeting to assist City staff in answering any questions the City Council may have. At the third City Council meeting (Public Hearing), the Engineer’s Report is finally approved and the levy of assessments is authorized. We anticipate attending the third City Council meeting (Public Hearing) to assist City staff in answering questions the City Council and the public may have regarding the Engineer’s Report, and the annual proceedings. If required, we can assist the City in the preparing of the Public Hearing Notice. The City will be responsible for the publication of the notice in a timely manner to meet state requirements. 144
Proposal for City of Cloverdale for LLAD Assessment Engineering Services | Page 4 Task 9 – Information to Sonoma County Assessor’s Office Once the City Council approves the Engineer’s Report at the Public Hearing and authorizes the levying and collecting of the annual assessments to parcels within the District, we will compile the necessary digital information in the format desired by the Sonoma County Assessor’s Office and transfer this information to the Sonoma County Assessor’s Office for inclusion on the tax rolls.

Certified copies of the final authorizing resolutions to levy and collect assessments will be needed from the City in order to accompany the assessment rolls to Sonoma County.

PROJECT FEE
Based upon our described scope of work, we propose to provide our professional engineering services on a time and materials basis not to exceed $18,185.00. The total amount we have specified is only for our described Scope of Work. If you request work to be performed outside the scope of work or if the scope of work changes, we reserve the right to negotiate the cost for the extra work. Please note that any reimbursable costs will be billed on an as-incurred basis plus 15%. We have a budget allowance of $600 for these costs included in the quoted amount above. Please note, all costs including this proposed fee associated with these proceedings, are recovered from the annual assessments levied and collected during FY 2025-26 from the parcels within the District.

SCHEDULE
Information will be electronically transmitted to the County Assessor’s office during July and August. We will complete all work associated with this year’s Engineer’s Report by mid-August.

We hope this proposal meets with your approval. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please let me know. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City and look forward to completing this important project for the City.

Sincerely,
Paul W. Wade, P.E.

Principal
F:\Proposal\Public\Cloverdale\LLAD\2025-26\Cloverdale LLAD 2025-26 Proposal.Docx 145
Proposal for City of Cloverdale for LLAD Assessment Engineering Services | Page 5

WORK ESTIMATE
Principal
Engineer
Paul W.

Supervising
Engineer
Jenny M.

Senior
Engr
Tech.

Junior
Engineer
$240 $215 $175 $155
1 MEET AND COORDINATE WITH CITY STAFF
Meetings 3 4 7 $1,580
Coordination 5.5 2 7.5 $1,750
2 PREPARE AGENDA REPORTS AND

RESOLUTIONS
Appointing Engineer of Work 1.5 2 2 5.5 $1,140
Preliminary Approval of Engineer's Report 1.5 4 2 7.5 $1,570 Final Approval of Engineer's Report 1.5 1 2 4.5 $925
3 BACKGROUND INFO.

Assessor parcel maps $0
Acquire recorded & electronic final map and
update basemap $0
Property owner information from the County 2 2 $430
Budget information 2 2 $430
4 BUDGETS
Develop Budget Worksheets 2 4 6 $1,130
Work with City Staff to develop budgets 2 2 4 $910
5 ENGINEER'S REPORT
Assessment Spread 4 4 2 10 $1,560
Assessment diagram 1 1 1 3 $390
Report Preparation (Prelim, Final, As Approved) 2 4 4 2 12 $2,040 Paper copy preparation & distribution 2 2 4 $350
PDF copy preparation & distribution 1 2 3 $175
6 PREPARATION OF BALLOTS
Ballot preparation and mailing (none) $0
7 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING
Public information meeting (none) $0
8 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
Public Hearing Notice 1 1 2 $390
City Council Meetings (2) 4 6 10 $2,250
9 COORDINATION WITH COUNTY
Convert data to County format and submit 1 2 3 $565

INCIDENTAL COSTS
Assessment Roll $400
Reproduction costs $100
Mileage $100
TOTALS 21 38 25 9 93 $18,185 No annexations
NOTES

CITY OF CLOVERDALE
Landscaping and Lighting District FY 2025-26 Assessment Engineering TASK
NUMBER
TOTAL
HOURS
TOTAL

COST TASK
146
City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item:

Meeting Date:

F.4
January 22, 2025
Agenda Section:

Consent
Staff Contact:

Kevin Thompson, City Manager
Agenda Item Title:

Consider Adoption of the 2025 City Council Subcommittee, Joint Subcommittee and Regional Board and Committee Appointments
_______________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):

Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Adopting the 2025 Roster of Subcommittee, Joint Committee and Regional Board/Committee Appointments and the 2025 Subcommittee Meeting Schedule.”
________________________________________________________________________________________ Background:

Cloverdale Municipal Code Chapter 2.06 describes the City Council’s subcommittee system. Municipal Code Section 2.06.040 states the following:

Each subcommittee shall consist of two city council members, with one member designated as the subcommittee chair, and the city manager. City council members shall serve a one-year term on the subcommittee, or until their successor is appointed. Subcommittee assignments and appointments will be made by the majority of the city council, which typically takes place during the first regularly scheduled city council meeting in January each year.

In addition to Council subcommittees, there are various regional boards that require the Council to formally designate a board representative. In some instances, the Regional Boards By-laws require that the primary and alternate Board appointees consist of elected officials. The Regional Boards that require board appointments to be elected officials include Sonoma Clean Power, Sonoma County Transportation Authority and Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary:

City staff distributed a subcommittee preference form to the Mayor and members of the City Council at the December 11, 2024, City Council Meeting. The results of the preference forms prepared by individual Councilmembers were subsequently compiled and presented to the City Council at the January 10, 2024, City Council meeting. The City Council reviewed and made final adjustments to the Subcommittee and Regional Board appointments and directed the list be returned for formal adoption by resolution at the following Council meeting.

Attached for the City Council’s consideration is a resolution setting forth the 2025 Subcommittee, Joint Committee and Regional Board/Council appointments including updated meeting times and meeting dates for the 2025 calendar year. The Subcommittee Calendar will be added to the website under the City Council Subcommittee page once created.
147
City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: January 22, 2025

________________________________________________________________________________________ Alternative Options:

1. Modify the Resolution and/or the 2025 Subcommittee, Joint Committee and Regional Board/Council Appointments; or

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:

Not Applicable
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:

None.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:

1. Resolution Approving the 2025 Subcommittee, Joint Committee and Regional Board/Council Appointments.

2. Exhibit A to Resolution – 2025 Subcommittee Appointments List

3. Exhibit B to Resolution – 2025 Regional Board/Committee Appointments and Dates 148

CITY OF CLOVERDALE

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ADOPTING THE 2025 ROSTER OF

SUBCOMMITTEE, JOINT COMMITTEE AND REGIONAL BOARD/COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS AND THE 2025 SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING SCHEDULES
WHEREAS, the City Council created the Management by Objectives (MBO) system for setting the City’s business objectives on June 28, 2006, including establishing the system of City Council Subcommittees; and
WHEREAS, Cloverdale Municipal Code Chapter 2.06 describes the City Council’s subcommittee system; and
WHEREAS, Municipal Code Section 2.06.040 states that each subcommittee shall consist of two City Council members, with one member designated as the subcommittee chair, and the City Manager; and WHEREAS, City Council members shall serve a one-year term on the subcommittee, or until their successor is appointed. Subcommittee assignments and appointments will be made by the majority of the City Council, which typically takes place during the first regularly scheduled City Council meeting in January each year; and
WHEREAS, the City participates on two joint committees with two separate local agencies (the Cloverdale Fire Protection District, and the Cloverdale Unified School District); and WHEREAS, the City establishes typical meeting days, times and locations for Council Subcommittees and the joint committees; and
WHEREAS, on January 8, 2025, the City Council reviewed the City Manager’s recommendations for Subcommittee, Joint Committee and Regional Board/Committee appointments; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and updated the City Manager’s recommendation to reflect the Councilmembers interests serving on Subcommittee, Joint Committee and Regional Board/Committee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council directed a formal resolution approving the 2025 Roster of Subcommittee, Joint Committee, and Regional Board/Committee memberships and meeting days and times be returned for Council action.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby:

1. Adopt the 2025 Roster of Subcommittee, Joint Committee, and Regional Board/Committee Appointments attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B;

2. Adopt the 2025 Subcommittee Meeting Schedules attached hereto as Exhibit C setting forth the subcommittee meeting dates and times; and

3. Rescind Resolution No. 004-2024.
149
It is hereby certified that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on the 22th day of January 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: (0) None
NOES: (0) None
ABSENT: (0) None
ABSTAIN: (0) None
APPROVED: ATTESTED:
_____________________________ _____________________________ Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Attachments:

1. Exhibit A - 2024 Subcommittee Appointments

2. Exhibit B - 2024 Regional Board/Committee Appointments

3. Exhibit C - 2024 Subcommittee Calendar (Meeting Schedule) 150
Exhibit A

CLOVERDALE CITY COUNCIL
2025

SUBCOMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
SUBCOMMITTEE: APPOINTMENTS
Administration * Lands; Morgenstern
Infrastructure : * Wheeler, Laskey
Joint City/Cloverdale Unified School District: * Lands; Wheeler Homelessness Community Advisory Group: * Morgenstern, Wheeler * Committee Chairperson
151
Exhibit B
* Appointment by and represents Sonoma County Mayors and Councilmember’s Association # Requires membership on SCTA / RCPA Board
** Appointment by League of CA Cities Board of Directors ++Subject to Sonoma County Mayors/Council Members Association appointment 2025 REGIONAL BOARD APPOINTMENTS
Regional Board / Committee 2025
Appointments
Meeting
Schedule
Cloverdale Chamber of Commerce Liaison Wheeler, Morgenstern (Alt.) 1st Thurs @ 5:30 pm Monthly Cloverdale Senior Center Liaison Lands, Wolter (Alt.) 1st Wed @ 4:30 pm Monthly Planning Commission Liaison Wolter, Laskey (Alt.) 1st Tues @ 6:00 pm; Monthly Cloverdale Rancheria Tribal Council Liaison Lands, Wolter (Alt.) As needed Cloverdale Regional Library Advisory
Board Wheeler, Wolter (Alt.) 3rd Tues-Feb, May, Aug, Nov League of CA Cities Board of Directors** Lands, Wheeler (Alt.) Quarterly Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution
Control District Wheeler, Laskey (Alt.) Scheduled as needed Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance
Fund (REMIF) / CIRA Holmes, Thompson (Alt.) 2nd Thu; noon (bi-monthly) Russian River Watershed Assn (RRWA) Morgenstern, Wheeler (Alt.) 4th Thursday; 9:00 am Sonoma Co. Mayors/Council
Members Assn Legislative
Committee
Lands, Wheeler (Alt.) 1st Friday @ 9:30 am
Sonoma Co. Open Space District Advisory
Board ++ Morgenstern, Wheeler (Alt.) 4th Thursday, 5:00 pm Sonoma Co. Transportation Authority
& Regional Climate Protection
Authority
Lands, Laskey (Alt.) 2nd Monday; 2:30 pm Monthly
Zero Waste Sonoma County Lands, Thompson (Alt) 3rd Thursday; 9:00 am Monthly Sonoma Clean Power Laskey, Wheeler (Alt.) 1st Tuesday; 12:00 pm Monthly 152
2025 Council, Planning Commission, Subcommittee
and Joint Committee Membership and Meeting Schedule
City Council Members Meetings: 2nd and 4th Wednesday of Every Month Lands, Todd
(Mayor)
Wheeler, Brian
(Vice-Mayor)
Wolter, Gus
Bagby, Melanie
Morgenstern,
Marjorie
January 8 and 22
February 12 and 26
March 12 and 26
April 9 and 23
May 14 and 28
June 11 and 25
July 9 and 23
August 13 and 27
September 10 and 24
October 8 and 22
November 12 and 26
December 10 and 24
Planning Commission Members Meetings: 1st Tuesday of Every Month 6:00 pm Spingler
Asay
Wagy
Carni
Cadle
Alt: J. Williams
Alt: D. Frankston
January 7
February 4
March 4
April 1
May 6
June 3
July 1
August 5
September 2
October 7
November 4
December 2
Subcommittee Members Meeting Day, Time, and Location*
2nd Tuesday at 2 p.m. - Monthly (Feb - Dec)
Administration Lands,
Morgenstern
February 11
March 11
April 8
May 13
June 10
July 8
August 12
September 9
October 14
November 11
December 9
4th Tuesday at 2 p.m. – Monthly (Feb - Dec)
Infrastructure Wheeler,
Laskey
February 25
March 25
April 22
May 27
June 24
July 22
August 26
September 23
October 28
November 25
December 23
As Needed
Homelessness
Community
Advisory Group
Morgenstern,
Wheeler
Special Meetings As Needed
3rd Tuesday at 2 p.m. (Feb - Dec)
Joint City /
Cloverdale Unified
School District
Morgenstern,
Wheeler
March 18
August 19

2nd Thursday – Bi-Monthly Dates and Time to be determined Sonoma County Mayor
& Councilmembers
Assoc.

Mayor,
Vice Mayor,
Designation
TBD by SCMCA
153
City Council/Successor
Agency
Agenda Item Summary
Agenda Item:

Meeting Date:

H.1
January 22, 2025
Agenda Section:

New Business
Staff Contact:

Kevin Thompson, City Manager
Derrick Montanye, Public Works Director
Agenda Item Title:

Direction on establishment of Outside Service Agreement Clearwater Ranch Recommended Council Action(s):

Provide Staff direction to drafting an Outside Service Agreement to provide water to Clearwater Ranch outside the City limits.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Background/Summary:

Clearwater Ranch is requesting an Outside Service Agreement enabling the distribution of city water to the site outside the city limits(Attachment 1). After discoverying an unsafe and failing well Clearwater was issued a citiation from the State Water Resources Board. According to Clearwater Ranch there is viable filtration solution. Clearwater Ranch is currently purchasing water from the city via a fire hyrant meter.

With the passage of ballot CC amending the City’s Urban Growth Boundary, Clearwater Ranch has the ability to move forward with annexation in to the city. However this a lengthy process, and given the dire water situation they currently face, the outside service agreement is the best option in the short run.

The process of completing an Outside Service Agreement involves both the City and Sonoma County Local Area Formation Committee (LAFCO). Once approved by the City, the applicant will submit an application to Sonoma County LAFCO.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Options:

1. Direct Staff to pursue the drafting of an Outside Service Agreement

2. Provide other direction
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:

N/A
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:

Application deposit of $5,725 is required.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:

1. Letter from Clearwater Ranch

2. Power Point
154
13 January 2025
Mr. Kevin Thompson, Manager
City of Cloverdale
124 N. Cloverdale Blvd.

Cloverdale, CA
Dear Mr. Thompson,
CRC is writing this letter to you to request an ‘Outside Service Agreement’ for Cloverdale City water.

As you know, in the fourth quarter of 2024 it was determined we have a failing well and we have been issued Citation and Compliance Order Number: 02_18_24J_010 for our water system. (Citation and Compliance Order is attached). We have no viable filtration solution and our only means to provide our tenants with water has been to have bottled water deliveries for drinking and cooking, and trucked-in water for all other water uses. This is a significantly challenging situation for us, and also for our tenants, most notably our tenant who operates a licensed elder care facility on our property.

We are very eager to resolve this situation as quickly as possible.

Our understanding is that there will be a Cloverdale city fee issued associated with this ‘outside service’ effort of approximately $5,725. We acknowledge this and are prepared to pay this expense.

We respectfully request your attentiveness to this issue and ask for your approval of this outside service request and help in achieving our connection to city water as quickly as possible.

We very much appreciate your support and your efforts.

Respectfully,
Howard Bogert
Chairman, CRC Board of Directors
Cc: Derrick Montanye, Leo Torreano, Chris Bogert
155
Clearwater Ranch Community (CRC) LLC was established in 2018 with the intent to provide a lifelong residential community for developmentally disabled (DD) adults of very low income.

CRC has been pursuing annexation into Cloverdale, and is one of the parcels that recently became within the Cloverdale urban growth boundary via Measure CC in the recent November election. We desire annexation, primarily, to enable construction of 2-3 additional residential buildings on our property, (ref letter: CRC to David Kelly, Manager; dated 2 Mar 2022.). Increased property income is necessary for long-term solvency.
156
CRC property has always been a “well property”
CRC discovered in August that our well water was very high in arsenic - California Water Board issued Citation and Compliance Order # 02_18_24J_010 on 3 December
CRC actions taken to mitigate well water non-potability:
- Have provided tenants with bottled water
- Investigated filtration solutions for ~ 3 months
- Filtration solutions are not viable
- Have had water trucked in to fill our water tank
- Have been filling our water tank with Cloverdale city water since early December - Shut off usage of CRC well in early November
CRC Request to Cloverdale City Council
157
CRC and our Elder Care facility are under duress
- Trucking in water is expensive: not financially sustainable for CRC in the longer term - Water trucks are damaging our roads
- Elder Care facility has been told they cannot accept new clients with current water situation CRC requests approval for pursuing temporary connection to Cloverdale city water (OSAA approval by city council and submittal to LAFCO) CRC Request to Cloverdale City Council
158