City Council Meeting Minutes - July 23, 2025 - Page 1 of 7 124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707-894-2521
www.cloverdale.net
MINUTES - FINAL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND JOINT MEETING OF THE CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 2025
5:00 CLOSED SESSION
CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM
124 N. CLOVERDALE BOULEVARD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
6:00 PM - OPEN SESSION
CLOVERDALE PERFORMING ART CENTER
209 N. CLOVERDALE BOULEVARD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM
1. OPENING CLOSED SESSION
1.A Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 5 p.m.
1.B Roll Call
Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern
Absent: None.
1.C Closed Session Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions) None.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION AGENDA:
None.
3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION TO HEAR THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S):
Mayor Lands recessed to Closed Session at 5:01 p.m.
3.A PUBLIC EMPLOYEE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)
Title: City Manager
Item was received and filed.
3.B CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
City Council Meeting Minutes - July 23, 2025 - Page 2 of 7 Labor Negotiator: City Attorney & Mayor
Employee: City Manager
Item was received and filed.
3.C REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: APN 001-173-006
City Negotiator: City Manager & City Attorney
Property Owner: Sava Foundation
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Item was received and filed.
Mayor Lands Adjourned Closed Session and reconvened to Open Session.
OPEN SESSION - 6:00 PM
Due to technical issues at the Cloverdale Performing Art Center (CPAC), items A - D.1 were not recorded.
A. OPENING PUBLIC SESSION
A.1 Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.
A.2 Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Lands led the pledge of allegiance.
A.3 Roll Call
Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern
Absent: None
A.4. Report Out on Closed Session
None.
A.5 Conflict of Interest Declaration
None.
A.6 Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
None.
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
B.1 Verbal Comments
Jeffrey McCastian spoke on issues.
B.2 Written Comments
-“City streets and sidewalks”
-“Sales tax and streets and sidewalks”
City Council Meeting Minutes - July 23, 2025 - Page 3 of 7 C. STUDENT LIAISON REPORT
None
D. PROCLAMATIONS
D.1 Disability Pride Month
Councilmember Morgenstern read the proclamation.
Recipient: None
D.2 National Night Out
Vice Mayor Wheeler read the proclamation.
Recipient: Chief Parker on behalf of the Cloverdale Police Department Chief Parker presented.
E. PRESENTATIONS
None.
F. CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Marquez requested to pull item F.2.
A motion was made by Councilmember Morgenstern, seconded by Vice Mayor Wheeler, to waive reading of the text and adopt Consent Calendar items F.1, F.3, F.4, F.5. F.6, and F.7.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern.
No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
F.1 Consider the Annual Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Ad Valorem 2025-26 Tax Rate for Inclusion on Property Tax Bills to Fund CalPERS Retirement Expenses ACTION: Resolution Approved.
RESOLUTION NO. 034-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE SETTING THE AD VALOREM TAX RATE FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM RETIREMENT BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
F.3 Consider the Annual Maintenance Services Agreement with Miksis Services, Inc. to Provide Sewer Maintenance and Rehabilitation
ACTION: Resolution Approved.
City Council Meeting Minutes - July 23, 2025 - Page 4 of 7 RESOLUTION NO. 035-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING A NEW ANNUAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MIKSIS SERVICES, INC. TO PROVIDE SEWER MAINTENANCE/REHABILITATION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $$218,497.40 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
F.4 Consider the Roadway Improvement Project list for fiscal year 2025/2026 funded by SB 1:
The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
ACTION: Resolution Approved.
RESOLUTION NO. 036-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
F.5 Consider action to declare all weeds growing within the City to be a public nuisance and declaring the City’s intention to remove and abate the same upon specified private properties under and in accordance with the provisions of the City of Cloverdale Municipal Code Chapter 8.16, entitled Weed Abatement
ACTION: Resolution Approved.
RESOLUTION NO. 037-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE DECLARING ALL WEEDS GROWING WITHIN THE CITY TO BE A PUBLIC
NUISANCE AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REMOVE AND ABATE THE SAME UPON
SPECIFIED PRIVATE PROPERTIES UNDER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.16, ENTITLED WEED ABATEMENT F.6 Approval of Minutes - May 14, 2025
ACTION: Approved as Submitted.
F.7 Approval of Minutes - May 28, 2025
ACTION: Approved as Submitted.
Mayor Lands moved to item F.2 pulled from the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Marquez.
F.2 Consider Approving a Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget to reflect previously discussed increased expenses
Councilmember Marquez provided comments and the Council discussed.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Wheeler, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive reading of the text and adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 038-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE APPROVING A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO INCREASE ALLOCATIONS FOR DOG PARK ADA IMPROVEMENTS, 2ND STREET GAZEBO, DOWNTOWN DRINKING FOUNTAIN
REPLACEMENTS, PORTERFIELD CREEK TRAIL REPAIRS, EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION, City Council Meeting Minutes - July 23, 2025 - Page 5 of 7
STUDENT LIAISON PROGRAM, RECREATION PROGRAMMING, AND CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern.
No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
G.1 Consider a Resolution Establishing and Updating the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services and Repealing Previously Adopted and Conflicting Fees and Charges for Such Services
Finance Director Holmes introduced the item and responded to Councilmember inquires and comments.
Mayor Lands opened the Public Hearing at 6:23 p.m.
Public Comments: None
Mayor Lands closed the Public Hearing at 6:24 p.m.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Wheeler, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive reading of the text and adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 039-2025 ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLOVERDALE ESTABLISHING AND UPDATING THE SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES
FOR CITY SERVICES AND REPEALING THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED AND CONFLICTING FEES
AND CHARGES FOR SUCH SERVICES
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern.
No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
G.2 Consider a Resolution Adopting a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in connection with the Circulation Element and approving a General Plan Amendment to update the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
City Manager Thompson introduced the item and Consultant representative Bean presented and responded to Councilmember inquiries and comments.
Public Comments:
An unidentified member of the public spoke regarding SMART train updates.
City Council Meeting Minutes - July 23, 2025 - Page 6 of 7 Councilmembers provided additional comments.
A motion was made by Councilmember Marquez, seconded by Vice Mayor Wheler, to waive reading of the text and adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 040-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPTING A SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) AND
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) IN CONNECTION WITH THE
CIRCULATION ELEMENT AND APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO UPDATE THE
CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern.
No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
H. NEW BUSINESS
H.1 Cloverdale Citizen Recognition Program (CCRP)
City Clerk and Public Information Officer Maloney introduced the item and responded to Councilmember inquiries and comments.
Public Comments:
Neena Hanchett provided comments.
Council provided direction to staff.
I. POTTER VALLEY PROJECT
Mayor Lands provided an update on the Potter Valley Project.
Councilmember Marquez requested the public comment be read aloud.
I.1 Supplemental Attachment(s)
Public Comment – Shirley Davis
City Clerk Maloney read the Public Comment at the Mayor’s direction.
Staff and Mayor Lands addressed the inquiries and comments in the Public Comment Letter.
Councilmember Marquez provided clarification on the flyer for the record.
Public Comments:
None.
Councilmember Marquez reported and provided comments and suggestions to the Council.
City Council Meeting Minutes - July 23, 2025 - Page 7 of 7 Councilmember Marquez raised a point of order concerning Public Comments.
Mayor Lands re-opened Public Comment:
Annabelle Burke inquired on where to find information on the Potter Valley Project Mayor Lands and City Clerk Maloney responded to the Public Comment.
Councilmember Marquez provided comments.
J. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
Councilmember Marquez reported on the repair fair.
K. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Councilmember Laskey reported on Councilmember Social Media views may not be reflective of the entire City Council. and other projects.
Councilmember Morgenstern reported on her attendance of the recent Town Hall, and Water Talk in Geyserville hosted by the Russian River Property Owners Association, and coordination of the Sonoma County Mayors and Councilmembers meeting, and an upcoming Regional Ag and Open Space meeting.
Vice Mayor Wheeler reported on the Geysers tour.
Councilmember Laskey reported on the 4th of July parade, the Russian River Property Association meeting, a recent mural at the Cloverdale High School Gymnasium, District 4 office aggregate management plan, funding for the Scouts Cabin, Cloverdale Food Pantry, and additional items.
L. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS, LETTERS OF SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
None.
M. CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
City Manager Thompson reported on the Furber Park playground opening.
N. COUNCIL DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Scouts Cabin request by Councilmember Marquez.
Mayor Lands requested clarification from Staff and City Manager Thompson provided comments.
The Council did not agendize the request.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lands adjourned the meeting at 7:06 p.m. to the next regular meeting of the Cloverdale City Council scheduled for August 13, 2025.
APPROVED ON: August 27, 2025
___________________________
Mike Maloney, City Clerk
124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707-894-2521
www.cloverdale.net
The Cloverdale City Council welcomes public interest, attendance, and in-person participation at meetings.
Open session meetings are held in-person at the Cloverdale Performing Art Center. You may also view the live streams online: Zoom: www.zoom.us/join Meeting ID: 823 1668 4527 | Youtube: cloverdale.net/youtube ATTENTION - the meeting location has been experiencing significant A/V technical difficulties for Livestreaming; Staff is attending to this matter, but reliability is not guaranteed to date - please attend in person.
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM
1. OPENING CLOSED SESSION
1.A Call to Order
1.B Roll Call
1.C Closed Session Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION AGENDA:
Prior to recessing to Closed Session, the Public may speak on Closed Session Items.
3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION TO HEAR THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S):
3.A PUBLIC EMPLOYEE EVALUATION
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND JOINT MEETING OF THE CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 2025
5:00 CLOSED SESSION
CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM
124 N. CLOVERDALE BOULEVARD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
6:00 PM - OPEN SESSION
CLOVERDALE PERFORMING ART CENTER
209 N. CLOVERDALE BOULEVARD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
1 Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)
Title: City Manager
3.B CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Labor Negotiator: City Attorney & Mayor
Employee: City Manager
3.C REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: APN 001-173-006
City Negotiator: City Manager & City Attorney
Property Owner: Sava Foundation
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
OPEN SESSION - 6:00 PM
A. OPENING PUBLIC SESSION
A.1 Call to Order
A.2 Pledge of Allegiance
A.3 Roll Call
A.4. Report Out on Closed Session
A.5 Conflict of Interest Declaration
A.6 Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
B.1 Verbal Comments
Any person wishing to speak in person on an item not listed on the agenda may do so at this time.
Pursuant to the Brown Act, the City Council is not allowed to consider issues or take action on any item not listed on the agenda. Three minutes are allotted to each speaker.
B.2 Written Comments
Public written communications sent to Council on items not listed on the agenda may be discussed at this time. Written communications to be discussed will be listed below, if any C. STUDENT LIAISON REPORT
None - Visit www.cloverdale.net/studentliaison for application information for the 25/26 School Year.
D. PROCLAMATIONS
City streets and sidewalks
Sales tax and streets and sidewalks
2 D.1 Disability Pride Month
Recipient: TBD
D.2 National Night Out
Recipient: Chief Parker on behalf of the Cloverdale Police Department E. PRESENTATIONS
None.
F. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items under the Consent Calendar will be considered together by one acEon of the City Council unless any Councilmember or member of the public requests that an item be removed and considered separately.
F.1 Consider the Annual Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Ad Valorem 2025-26 Tax Rate for Inclusion on Property Tax Bills to Fund CalPERS Retirement Expenses Recommended Action(s):
Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Setting the Ad Valorem Tax Rate for Public Employee Retirement System Retirement Benefits for Fiscal Year 2025-
26.”
F.2 Consider Approving a Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget to reflect previously discussed increased expenses
Recommended Action(s):
Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving a Budget Amendment to Increase Allocations for Dog Park ADA Improvements, 2nd Street Gazebo, Downtown Drinking Fountain Replacements, Porterfield Creek Trail Repairs, Employee Appreciation, Student Liaison Program, Recreation Programming, and Chamber of Commerce”.
F.3 Consider the Annual Maintenance Services Agreement with Miksis Services, Inc. to Provide Sewer Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Recommended Action(s):
Adopt a Resolution Entitled: “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale approving a new Annual Maintenance Services Agreement with Miksis Services, Inc. to provide sewer maintenance/rehabilitation in an amount not to exceed $$218,497.40 and authorizing the City Manager to execute said agreement.”
Proclamation - Disability Pride Month
Proclamation - National Night Out
Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - PERS Rate Calculation
Attachment 3 - County Clerk Recorder Assessor Registrar of Voters Correspondence Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Budget Amendment Form
Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
3 F.4 Consider the Roadway Improvement Project list for fiscal year 2025/2026 funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
Recommended Action(s):
Adopt A Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Adopting a List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017”
F.5 Consider action to declare all weeds growing within the City to be a public nuisance and declaring the City’s intention to remove and abate the same upon specified private properties under and in accordance with the provisions of the City of Cloverdale Municipal Code Chapter 8.16, entitled Weed Abatement
Recommended Action(s):
Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale declaring all weeds growing within the city to be a public nuisance and declaring its intention to remove and abate the same upon specified private properties under and in accordance with the provisions of the City of Cloverdale Municipal Code Chapter 8.16, entitled weed abatement.” F.6 Approval of Minutes - May 14, 2025
Recommended Action(s):
Approve the May 14, 2025 Draft Minutes
F.7 Approval of Minutes - May 28, 2025
Recommended Action(s):
Approve the May 28, 2025 Draft Minutes
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
G.1 Consider a Resolution Establishing and Updating the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services and Repealing Previously Adopted and Conflicting Fees and Charges for Such Services Recommended Action(s):
Adopt the Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Establishing and Updating the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services and repealing the previously adopted and conflicting fees and charges for such services.”
Attachment 2 - Exhibit A FY25/26 Collection System Maintenance Quotes Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Exhibit A - Proposed Project List
Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Exhibit A - Fire District Letter - Non-Compliant Properties CC Minutes - May 14, 2025 (Draft)
CC Minutes - May 14, 2025 (Draft)
Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
4 G.2 Consider a Resolution Adopting a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in connection with the Circulation Element and approving a General Plan Amendment to update the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
Recommended Action(s):
Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City of Cloverdale city council adopting a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in connection with the Circulation Element and approving a General Plan Amendment to update the Circulation Element of the General Plan.”
H. NEW BUSINESS
H.1 Cloverdale Citizen Recognition Program (CCRP)
Recommended Action(s):
Provide direction on the proposed recognition program.
I. POTTER VALLEY PROJECT
Standing Item for Council to discuss the Potter Valley Project on an on-going basis.
I.1 Supplemental Attachment(s)
J. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
Subcommittee Agendas, Approved Minutes, and Media are available at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter.
K. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Councilmembers may provide written and or verbal informational reports and updates on regional boards, committees, and community activities.
L. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS, LETTERS OF SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
None.
M. CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
Staff may provide written and or verbal informational reports.
N. COUNCIL DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmembers may request agenda items for future Council and or Council Subcommittee meetings.
Attachment 2 - Exhibit A - Master Fee Schedule
Attachment 3 - Public Hearing Notice (July 11, 2025)
Agenda Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Exhibit A1 - Circulation Element
Exhibit A2 Cross sections
Exhibit B1 Subsequent EIR
Exhibit B2 Subsequent EIR exhibits
Exhibit B3 Final Subsequent EIR
Exhibit C - MMRP
Presentation
Agenda Report
Public Comment - Shirley Davis
5 O. ADJOURNMENT
To the next regular meeting of the Cloverdale City Council scheduled for August 13, 2025.
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Members of the public may provide comment on an agenda item in-person during the public comment periods. Commenters will have three (3) minutes to speak. City Council is unable to respond directly to quesEons or enter into dialogue with commenters. Comments may also be submiMed prior t o [email protected]. by 12 p.m. the day of the meeEng. Submissions and supplemental attachments are considered public records pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5.
SPECIAL NEEDS ACCOMMODATIONS: In compliance with the Americans with DisabiliEes Act and Title VI, if you need special assistance to parEcipate in this meeEng, please contact the City Clerk's office at [email protected] or 707.894-1712. NoEficaEon at least 72 hours prior to the meeEng will enable the City to make reasonable accommodations are made to provide accessibility to the meeting.
AB 2449: Councilmembers parEcipate in person or teleconference methods consistent with tradiEonal provisions of the Brown Act, Government Code § 54953(b), unless the meeEng is being held pursuant to provisions of AB 2449. If a technical issue arises with Zoom or the dial-in opEon, the meeEng will conEnue unless it is being held pursuant to the provisions of Assembly Bill 2449.
AB 343: Any wriEngs or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspecEon in the City Hall offices located at 124 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, CA 95425 during normal business hours as provided by Assembly Bill 343.
WAIVER WARNING: If you challenge decisions/direcEons of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearings described in this agenda, or in wriMen correspondence delivered to the City of Cloverdale, or prior to, the public hearing.
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
The City Clerk’s Office does hereby declare that, in accordance with California Government Code § 54954.2(a), this agenda for the above stated meeting(s) was posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting (24 hours prior to a Special Meeting) on the outdoor bulletin board at City Hall, 124 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, CA, 95425 and the Cloverdale Performing Art Center, 209 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, CA, 95425, and online at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter. The agenda is also available for public review at City Hall at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
Date posted: July 17, 2025 | Time posted: 4 p.m. | City Clerk Signature: s/Mike Maloney 6 From: Maeta Emmons
To: Public Comments
Subject: City streets and sidewalks
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 2:16:42 PM
Hoping you’ll publish a list of the work to be done in Cloverdale showing streets and sidewalks etc.
Maeta Emmons
7 From: Maeta Emmons
To: Public Comments
Subject: Sales tax and streets and sidewalks
Date: Thursday, July 17, 2025 8:55:07 PM
Will Council please publish a list of prioritized street and sidewalk repairs and improvements and anticipated timelines?
The people are anxious to know.
Maeta Emmons
108 N East St
719-210-4050
8 A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE PROCLAIMING JULY 2025 AS DISABILITY PRIDE MONTH
WHEREAS, Disability Pride Month is celebrated nationally in the month of July and serves as an opportunity to honor the history, achievements, experiences, and ongoing struggles of the disability community; and
WHEREAS, this month marks the anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), landmark civil rights legislation that broke down barriers to inclusion in society; and WHEREAS, July offers a time to reflect on the disability rights movement, the progress achieved, and the work still to be done; and
WHEREAS, the City of Cloverdale recognizes that one of its greatest strengths is the diversity of its people, and reaffirms its commitment to equity, dignity, and inclusion for all disabled individuals, while rejecting all forms of discrimination and hate; and
WHEREAS, disabled individuals enrich our community in countless and immeasurable ways—through leadership, advocacy, creativity, labor, and everyday contributions; and WHEREAS, despite decades of advocacy, disabled people continue to face discrimination, harassment, and violence, and yet persist—through their own resilience and with the support of families, community organizations, businesses, and allies; and
WHEREAS, disability discrimination is often compounded by systemic inequities based on race, gender identity, sexual orientation, immigration status, religion, age, and other intersecting identities; and WHEREAS, the City of Cloverdale strives to lead by example in fostering a more inclusive and equitable community through its laws, policies, staff, and public institutions; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that I, Mayor Lands, and the Cloverdale City Council, do hereby proclaim July 2025 as "Disability Pride Month" in the City of Cloverdale, and invite all residents to join in celebrating the resilience, contributions, and ongoing efforts of the disability community.
Dated: July 23, 2025
SO ORDERED:
_______________________
Todd Lands, Mayor
9 A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE PROCLAIMING AUGUST 5TH, 2025, AS NATIONAL NIGHT OUT
WHEREAS, seeing a need to involve both community watch groups and community members in neighborhood safety efforts, the National Association of Town Watch (NATW) started National Night Out (NNO).
WHEREAS, NNO began in August of 1984 through an already-established network of law enforcement agencies, neighborhood watch groups, civic groups, state and regional crime prevention associations, and volunteers across the nation.
WHEREAS, Starbucks, ADT, 711 Cares Foundation, Swank Motion Pictures, Associa and L.E.A.D. are sponsoring its 42ST annual nationwide crime, drug, and violence prevention program on August 5, 2025 entitled "National Night Out"; and
WHEREAS, the "42th Annual Night Out" provides a unique opportunity for Citizens of Cloverdale to join forces with thousands of communities across the State of California in promoting cooperative, police community crime and drug prevention efforts; and
WHEREAS, the "National Night Out" event is a year-long community building campaign designed to heighten crime prevention awareness; generate support and participation in local anti-crime programs; strengthen neighborhood spirit and police-community partnerships and send a message to criminals to let them know that neighborhoods are organized and are fighting back; and
WHEREAS, local citizens play a vital role in assisting police agencies through joint crime, drug, and violence prevention efforts; and
WHEREAS, police-community partnerships, neighborhood safety, awareness, and cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out" program; and
WHEREAS, the Cloverdale Police Department has continued their commitment to excellence in service and to working together with the community to keep them safe.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that I, Todd Lands, Mayor of the City of Cloverdale do hereby recognize, on behalf of the Cloverdale City Council, August 5, 2025, as, "National Night Out" in Cloverdale and encourages all members of the community to continue to help make our community a safer and more enjoyable place to live, work and play.
Dated: July 23, 2025
SO ORDERED:
Todd Lands, Mayor
10 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item:
Meeting Date:
F.1
July 23, 2025
Agenda Section:
Consent
Staff Contact:
Susie Holmes, Finance Director
Agenda Item Title:
Annual Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the Ad Valorem 2025-26 Tax Rate for Inclusion on Property Tax Bills to Fund CalPERS Retirement Expenses
________________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):
Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Setting the Ad Valorem Tax Rate for Public Employee Retirement System Retirement Benefits for Fiscal Year 2025-26.” ________________________________________________________________________________________ Background:
In 1974, the voters of the City of Cloverdale approved a tax to pay for Public Employees’ Retirement System expenses. A tax rate must be computed and approved by the City Council each year and transmitted to the County Auditor-Controller’s Office for inclusion on the property tax bills. The Tax rate must be set by a Resolution by the City Council (Attachment 1).
Staff has computed the tax rate of $0.08 per one hundred dollars of assessed value (Attachment 2). The calculation includes the fiscal year 2025-26 Auditor Certified Values provided by the County, the projected CalPERS retirement expenses, the PERS rates for safety and miscellaneous members, and the reserve requirement. The value of benefits added after the voters approved the tax has been subtracted from the PERS rates before calculating the City’s tax requirements. These “after added” benefits are paid by other available revenues in the General Fund, Enterprise Funds, and required contributions from employees. Also, the City has twenty-four (24) Public Employee Pension Reform Act “PEPRA” members who are required under state law to pay 50% of the cost of their benefits, which helps reduce the amount of tax required from the voters.
Last year, the Council agreed to establish a rate stabilization reserve fund of $1,250,000, which was approximately 72% of the estimated expenditures for the fiscal year. The City received revenues based on assessed property values, ending the year with a projected reserve balance of $1,910,000.
All tax calculations are projections, the City’s annual tax revenue may be higher or lower, based on assessed values as determined by the Sonoma County Assessor. The employee retirement expense estimates are extrapolated from the budget and rates established by CalPERS. Actual expenses may be higher or lower based on actual payroll costs, employee additions or turn-over, and whether new hires are “Classic” or “PEPRA” members.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary:
Last year the City reduced the tax rate to 8.0% per $100 of Assessed Value. Two years ago the City reduced the tax rate to 9.8% per $100 of Assessed Value. This year, retirement costsincreased approximately $91,500 over FY 2024-25. However, the County estimates include an increase in assessed value over last year’s estimates by 3.59% or $54,112,063. This change allows the tax rate to remain at $0.08 per $100 of assessed value, while maintaining a reserve balance of $1,250,000, which will result in a reserve balance of 65%. 11 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: July 24, 2024
Maintaining the reserve will offset projected increased future costs of the unfunded accrued liability and enable the tax rate to be maintained at a consistent level over time. Maintaining a 75-100% retirement fund reserve balance is ideal to ensure adequate cash flow is available to pay bi-weekly retirement costs as tax increment payments are received from the County in January and April.
The City has a total CalPERS Unfunded Liability, of approximately $13,652,000 which is amortized over the next 20 years and has an option each year of making a lump-sum payment toward the Unfunded Liability payment or spreading the payment out over the course of the year, the City has opted to make the one-time payment which resulted in a savings in the amount of $38,994.
The City contracted with Bartel and Associates two years ago to calculate the Pension Override Tax to verify that the tax has been correctly calculated. The difference between staff and Bartel’s calculations was so minimal that it did not affect the tax rate.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution setting a tax rate at 8% or $0.08 per one hundred dollars of assessed value for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Alternative Options:
1. Set Ad Valorem Tax Rate at a higher rate and increase the reserve balance.
2. Set Ad Valorem Tax Rate at a lower rate and decrease the reserve balance.
3. Provide alternative direction to staff.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:
None
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:
8% or $0.08 per one hundred dollars of assessed value, will generate approximately $1,246,285 for the PERS retirement, anticipated costs of $1,906,285 program expenses, and maintain an adequate reserve level of $1,250,000
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Attachment - PERS Rate Calculation
3. Attachment - County Clerk-Recorder-Assessor- Registrar of Voters Correspondence 12 CITY OF CLOVERDALE
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE,
SETTING THE AD VALOREM TAX RATE FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
RETIREMENT SYSTEM RETIREMENT BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 WHEREAS, the City of Cloverdale has entered into a contract with the Public Employees' Retirement System of the State of California for the provision of retirement and related benefits to the employees of the City of Cloverdale, and pursuant to previously established voter authorization, the City of Cloverdale is authorized to establish the levy for the current fiscal year in order to fund its responsibilities under the contract; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that an Ad Valorem tax rate for fiscal year 2024-25 be levied upon property in the City of Cloverdale for the above purpose in an amount of $0.08 per one hundred dollars of full assessed valuation; and
BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Assessor, Auditor, Tax Collector and other appropriate officials of the County of Sonoma are hereby authorized and directed to spread the specified assessment upon the tax rolls of all taxable property within the City of Cloverdale in the County of Sonoma, and to receive, collect, and disburse the same in accordance with law and the agreement between the City of Cloverdale and the County of Sonoma.
The foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on the 23rd day of July 2025 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: (X)
NOES: (X) None
ABSTAIN: (X) None
ABSENT: (X) None
APPROVED: ATTEST:
______________________________ ____________________________________ Todd Lands, Mayor Michael Maloney, City Clerk
13 Classic Members Miscellaneous Safety Total
Earnings subject to PERS - Classic Members $ 1,778,746 $ 735,749 $ 2,514,494 2025/26 PERS Rate - Employer Paid 19.580% 36.380%
Less After Added Benefits 2.240% 9.010%
Net PERS Rate to be Funded by Tax 17.340% 27.370%
Normal Contribution - Classic Members 308,435 201,374
Employer Payment of Unfunded Liability (Total UAL $13,652,044) 528,136 574,453 Amount to be funded by Tax $ 836,571 $ 775,827 $ 1,612,398 New Members Miscellaneous Safety Total
Earnings subject to PERS - New Members $ 1,747,109 $ 1,106,629 $ 2,853,738 2024/25 PERS Rate - Employer Paid 7.960% 13.990%
Net PERS Rate to be Funded by Tax 7.960% 13.990%
Normal Contribution - New Members $ 139,070 $ 154,817
Employer Payment of Unfunded Liability
Amount to be Funded by Tax - New Members $ 139,070 $ 154,817 $ 293,887 Amount to be Funded by Tax - Total $ 975,640 $ 930,645 $ 1,906,285 - Reserves for Rate Stabilization 1,250,000
Total Requirements $ 3,156,285
Less Estimated Available Balance at July 1, 2025 (1,910,000) Less Other Revenue Sources (Estimates based on prior year) - Interest (based on budget) - Total Tax Requirement for FY 2025/26 $ 1,246,285 Secured Unsecured Total
Property Values - Fiscal Year 2025/26 Tax Roll 1,491,512,972 68,413,133 $ 1,559,926,105 Less RDA Increment - - $ - Cloverdale DS Net Value $ 1,559,926,105 Total Requirements $ 1,246,285
Tax Rate (Requirements divided by DS Net Value times 100) Property Tax Rate per $100 of Assessed Value 8.0%
Attachment A
City of Cloverdale
PERS Retirement Tax Rate Calculation
Fiscal Year 2025-26
14 From: Lindsay VanMidde
To: Susie Holmes; Vanessa Thomas
Cc: Edward Daniels
Subject: RE: City of Cloverdale 2025-26 Certified Values Date: Thursday, June 26, 2025 8:50:26 AM
Attachments: image002.png
image003.png
image001.png
Hi Susie,
The Assessor has turned over the roll to us. Below are Certified Values for 2025 (Including Aircraft).
Thank you,
Lindsay VanMidde
Auditor-Controller-Treasurer-Tax Collector
Property Tax Accounting Manager
(707) 565-3279 ACTTC-PropertyTax@sonomacounty.org
585 Fiscal Drive, Suite 100
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
sonomacounty.ca.gov/auditor-controller-treasurer-taxcollector From: Susie Holmes <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 3:34 PM
To: Lindsay VanMidde <[email protected]>; Vanessa Thomas <[email protected]>
Subject: City of Cloverdale 2025-26 Certified Values
EXTERNAL
Good morning,
15 I am checking in to see if you have a timeline for the 2025-26 certified values. I am trying to schedule the City’s annual Ad Valorem tax rate before the City Council in late July. Do you think they will be ready by then?
Susie Holmes
Susie Holmes|Finance Director|City of Cloverdale
124 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, CA 95425
(707) 894-1715
www.cloverdale.net
City Hall is open Monday–Thursday
7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
City Hall will be closed in honor of our Independence Day Holiday starting July 3rd THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF THE SONOMA COUNTY EMAIL SYSTEM.
Warning: If you don’t know this email sender or the email is unexpected, do not click any web links, attachments, and never give out your user ID or password. 16 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item:
Meeting Date:
F.2
July 23, 2025
Agenda Section:
Consent
Staff Contact:
Susie Holmes, Finance Director.
Agenda Item Title:
Consider Approving a Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget to reflect previously discussed increased expenses
________________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):
Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Approving a Budget Amendment to Increase Allocations for Dog Park ADA Improvements, 2nd Street Gazebo, Downtown Drinking Fountain Replacements, Porterfield Creek Trail Repairs, Employee Appreciation, Student Liaison Program, Recreation Programming, and Chamber of Commerce”. _______________________________________________________________________________________ Background/Summary:
Following the staff presentation to the City Council on June 25, 2025, the following budget amendments are proposed:
• Dog Park ADA Improvements – $5,000 (Park Impact Fees) Installation of an ADA-compliant ramp from the dog park gates to the shade structure. Funded through Park Impact Fees.
2nd Street Gazebo – $60,000 (Park Impact Fees)
Installation of a shaded structure at 2nd Street Park to enhance usability. Funded through Park Impact Fees. • Downtown Drinking Fountain Replacements – $20,000 (Park Impact Fees) Replacement of nonfunctional drinking fountains along the Boulevard. Funded through Park Impact Fees.
• Porterfield Creek Trail Repairs – $30,000 (Measure M Parks) Installation of new steps to repair approximately 500 feet of trail affected by a slide. Funded through Measure M Parks tax revenues.
• Employee Appreciation – $2,000 (General Fund)
Increased allocation to account for inflation-related costs. Funded through the General Fund. • Student Liaison Program – $1,000 (General Fund)
Increase annual scholarship funding for student liaisons from $750 to $1,250 per student, totaling $2,500. Funded through the General Fund.
• Parks Programming – $4,000 (General Fund)
Expansion of recreational offerings through additional instructors and programs. Funded through the General Fund.
• Chamber of Commerce – $50,000 (General Fund)
The Chamber Director appeared before the City Council in February 2025 and requested an increase in funding due to additional operating expenditures. 17 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: February 26, 2025
_______________________________________________________________________________________ Alternative Options:
1. Reject the proposed resolution that approves the budget amendments.
2. Request modifications to the amendment and continue the matter to a future Regular Council Meeting.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:
These items were discussed at the February 26, 2025 and June 25, 2025 City Council Meetings with a request to bring back the budget amendments at a future meeting. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:
The proposed budget amendment will reduce assigned fund balances and will impact the City’s unrestricted reserves by $57,000.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Exhibit A - Budget Amendment Form
18 CITY OF CLOVERDALE
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ____-2025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO INCREASE ALLOCATIONS FOR DOG PARK ADA IMPROVEMENTS, 2ND STREET
GAZEBO, DOWNTOWN DRINKING FOUNTAIN REPLACEMENTS, PORTERFIELD CREEK TRAIL
REPAIRS, EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION, STUDENT LIAISON PROGRAM, RECREATION
PROGRAMMING, AND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cloverdale previously received a staff report and presentation on June 25, 2025, regarding proposed adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget; and
WHEREAS, staff have identified a need to amend the budget to fund the following projects and initiatives:
• Dog Park ADA Improvements in the amount of $5,000, funded through Park Impact Fees; • 2nd Street Gazebo improvements in the amount of $60,000, funded through Park Impact Fees;
• Replacement of Downtown Drinking Fountains in the amount of $20,000, funded through Park Impact Fees;
• Porterfield Creek Trail Repairs in the amount of $30,000, funded through Measure M Parks tax revenues;
• Employee Appreciation funding increase of $2,000, funded through the General Fund; • Student Liaison Program funding increase of $1,000, funded through the General Fund; • Parks Programming expansion in the amount of $4,000, funded through the General Fund; and
• Chamber of Commerce in the amount of $50,000 funded through the General Fund.
WHEREAS, the total General Fund impact is $57,000, which will result in a corresponding reduction in the City’s unrestricted reserves; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that these budget amendments are necessary to improve public amenities, support City programs, and enhance community services; and WHEREAS, staff has prepared a Budget Amendment Form (attached hereto as Exhibit A) that reflects the revised appropriations.
WHEREAS, the City has assigned fund balance for various CIP projects that can be used for these one-time expenses; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale as follows:
1. The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference.
2. The City Council approves the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment as detailed in Exhibit A.
3. The Finance Director is authorized and directed to make the necessary accounting and budget entries to reflect these changes.
19 The foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on the 23rd day of July, 2025 by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: (_) Councilmember Brigham, Councilmember Cruz, Councilmember Turner, Noes: (_) None
Absent: (_)
Abstaining: (_) None
APPROVED: ATTEST:
_________________________ __________________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Attachments:
Exhibit A – Budget Amendment Form
20 Budget Amendment Form
REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
Fund Dept Amendment
Amount
REVENUE TOTAL -
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES
Fund Dept Amendment
Amount
508 00.000 5,000
508 00.000 60,000
508 00.000 20,000
214 40.800 30,000
100 10.105 2,000
Student Liaison Program 100 10.101 1,000
100 10.104 50,000
EXPENDITURE TOTAL 168,000
PURPOSE
appreciation and student liaison program
Date Date
Date Entered by Date
42135.000
49130.000
49130.000
To cover the costs associated with park and infrastructure improvements, employee Porterfield Creek Trail Repairs
City Manager
Chamber of Commerce
Construction - 2nd Street Gazebo
Construction - Dog Park ADA
Drinking Fountains Replacement
Employee Appreciation
Department Head Finance Director
49130.000
42345.000
49130.000
42345.000
Date Prepared
July 8, 2025
Account Description Account No.
Finance
Account No.
Requesting Department
Account Description
Prepared By
Susie Holmes
X:\Agenda Development\COUNCIL\2025 Reports\7-23-2025\Consent\Budget Amendment\2-Budget Amendment Form 21 City Council/Successor
Agency
Agenda Item Summary
Agenda Item:
Meeting Date:
F.3
July 23, 2025
Agenda Section:
Consent
Staff Contact:
Derrick Montanye, Public Works Director
Agenda Item Title:
Consider the Annual Maintenance Services Agreement with Miksis Services, Inc. to Provide Sewer Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Recommended Council Action(s):
Adopt a Resolution Entitled: “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale approving a new Annual Maintenance Services Agreement with Miksis Services, Inc. to provide sewer maintenance/rehabilitation in an amount not to exceed $$218,497.40 and authorizing the City Manager to execute said agreement.”
________________________________________________________________________________________ Background:
As part of the City’s ongoing infrastructure management program, Public Works schedules annual maintenance and rehabilitation for the sanitary sewer collection system. This includes thermal plastic lining of deteriorated pipelines and epoxy coating of manholes, which extends useful life and prevents groundwater infiltration.
Miksis Services, Inc. (MSI), a licensed contractor with regional specialization, submitted quotations for the FY 2025–26 locations and scope of work. Task 1 (114 to 124 Railroad) was previously approved in FY 2024–25 and is being rolled over with its budget intact. A 10% contingency is applied to Task 1, 2 and 3 ________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary:
The FY 2025–26 Annual Wastewater Collection System Maintenance includes the following scope and budget:
Task 1: 114 to 124 Railroad – 345’ of 8” sanitary sewer rehabilitation and lateral reconnection (rollover from FY2024–25)
Task 1 Amount: $54,805.00
Task 2: MH 124 Railroad to MH Railroad/East – 248’ of 8” trenchless rehabilitation with 4 lateral reinstatements
Task 2 Amount: $23,064.00
Task 3 - Various Locations – Clean, seal, prep, and apply 100% solid epoxy to 6 sanitary sewer manholes Location Dimension Approx Area(sq.ft.)
West 2nd (Apt) 6’ x 6’ 141
West 2nd @ Foothill 6’ x 8’ 138
West 1st @ Franklin 6’ x 6’ 141
Jefferson @ Haehl 6’ x 4’ 141
22 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: July 23, 2025
Jefferson @ School 4’ x 4’ 62
Wallace @ Furber 6’ x 8’ 138
Task 3 Amount: $120,765.00
Sub Total Project Cost: $198,634.00
Contingency: $19,863.40
Total Project Encumbrance: $218,497.40
________________________________________________________________________________________ Options:
• Approve Resolution
• Reject Resolution
• Provide alternative direction to staff
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:
N/A
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:
The total project cost including contingency, is $218,497.40. Funding is allocated from Sewer Fund 630, 49130 Construction. All tasks have been Budgeted for.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. FY25_26 Collection System Maintenance Quotes
23 CITY OF CLOVERDALE
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING A NEW ANNUAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MIKSIS SERVICES, INC. TO
PROVIDE SEWER MAINTENANCE/REHABILITATION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $218,497.40 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Cloverdale performs annual maintenance and rehabilitation of its sewer collection system to prolong the life of existing infrastructure and prevent groundwater infiltration; and
WHEREAS, Miksis Services, Inc. has provided a quotation for rehabilitation work including trenchless lining and epoxy coating services, which are specialized in nature and consistent with the City's infrastructure needs; and
WHEREAS, the scope of work includes three tasks:
Task 1 – 114 to 124 Railroad (345’ of 8” sanitary sewer rehabilitation), originally approved in FY 2024–25 and carried forward; Task 2 – MH 124 Railroad to MH Railroad/East (248’ of 8” trenchless rehabilitation with four lateral reinstatements); Task 3 – Epoxy coating of six sewer manholes at various locations within the City; and
WHEREAS, the total proposed contract amount is $198,634.00, and includes a 10% contingency for Task 1,2 and 3, resulting in a total authorized project budget not to exceed $$218,497.40; and WHEREAS, City staff have reviewed the quotations and determined that the work complies with the City’s purchasing policies as outlined in Cloverdale Municipal Code Chapter 3.08; and WHEREAS, Miksis Services, Inc. is a licensed contractor qualified to perform the proposed work and has performed similar work for the City in past fiscal years; and WHEREAS, this project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations as it involves the maintenance and repair of existing public infrastructure with no expansion of use.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cloverdale hereby:
1. change orders, Find the project to be categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
2. Approve the Annual Maintenance Services Agreement with Miksis Services, Inc. for the FY 2025–26 Wastewater Collection System Maintenance Project in the amount of $198,634.00.
24 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement and approve any provided the total project cost including contingency does not exceed $218,497.40.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on the 23rd day of July, 2025, by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: (_) Councilmember Brigham, Councilmember Cruz, Councilmember Turner, Noes: (_) None
Absent: (_)
Abstaining: (_) None
APPROVED: ATTEST:
_________________________ __________________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Attachments:
Exhibit A - FY25_26 Collection System Maintenance Quotes 25 3492A Quote
Dba Rapid Rooter
P.O. Box 591-I, Healdsburg, CA 95448-0590
1-888-UNPLUGU (707) 433-8053 FAX (707) 433-8085
Email: [email protected] Website: www.unplugu.com
Contractor’s License 544530, A, C-36, HAZ, D6, D12
GM | fc P a g e 1 | 1
June 23, 2025
Jay Robinson
City of Cloverdale
PO Box 217,
Cloverdale, CA 95425
(707) 894-1719
[email protected]
Jobsite: 114 to 124 Railroad
Scope of work: Rehab 345’ of 8” Sanitary Sewer
Miksis Services, Inc. (MSI) proposes to saw cut the asphalt in roadway at 114 Railroad. Then excavate the clean out to the tee connection on the horizontal portion of the 8” sewer main.
Following, the broken tee will be removed and the segment will be lined using Dynaliner 350’ from the manhole at 124 Railroad to the open excavation. After the host pipe is lined, the lateral at 334’ will be connected and a new end of run clean out will be installed and terminated at street level. All active lateral taps will be robotically reinstated. A post rehab video will be submitted.
Equipment, Materials, & Labor $54,805.00
Total $54,805.00
Conditions and Assumptions:
MSI will be allowed unlimited and uninterrupted access to the job site. Costs associated with permit(s), bond(s), and license(s) are excluded. Any changes, modifications, or additions to this scope of work will require a change order. This job is bid at a prevailing wage.
Standard traffic control will consist of cones & signage. The city will provide a dumpsite for excavation spoils.
Thank you for the opportunity to present our proposal for this project. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments. This quote will remain valid for 30 days.
Gary Miksis
President
Miksis Services, Inc.
Authorized Signature for Bid Acceptance Date
26 3493A Quote
Dba Rapid Rooter
P.O. Box 591-I, Healdsburg, CA 95448-0590
1-888-UNPLUGU (707) 433-8053 FAX (707) 433-8085
Email: [email protected] Website: www.unplugu.com
Contractor’s License 544530, A, C-36, HAZ, D6, D12
GM | fc P a g e 1 | 1
June 23, 2025
Jay Robinson
City of Cloverdale
PO Box 217,
Cloverdale, CA 95425
(707) 894-1719
[email protected]
Jobsite: MH 124 Railroad to MH Railroad/East
Scope of work: Trenchless rehab of 248’ of 8” Sanitary Sewer with heavy Infiltration.
Miksis Services, Inc. (MSI) proposes to clean and remove roots, line using Dynaliner Thermoform PVC Pipe Liner, and robotically reinstate 4 lateral connections.
Equipment, Materials, & Labor $23,064.00
Total $23,064.00
Conditions and Assumptions:
MSI will be allowed unlimited and uninterrupted access to the job site. Costs associated with permit(s), bond(s), and license(s) are excluded. Any changes, modifications, or additions to this scope of work will require a change order. This job is bid at a prevailing wage.
Installation must be done at lower ground water calendar.
Thank you for the opportunity to present our proposal for this project. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments. This quote will remain valid for 30 days.
Gary Miksis
President
Miksis Services, Inc.
Authorized Signature for Bid Acceptance Date
27 3535A Quote
Dba Rapid Rooter
P.O. Box 591-I, Healdsburg, CA 95448-0590
1-888-UNPLUGU (707) 433-8053 FAX (707) 433-8085
Email: [email protected] Website: www.unplugu.com
Contractor’s License 544530, A, C-36, HAZ, D6, D12
D R | f c P a g e 1 | 2
June 23, 2025
Jay Robinson
City of Cloverdale
Po Box 217,
Cloverdale, CA 95425
(707) 894-1719
[email protected]
Jobsite: Various Locations, Cloverdale
Scope of work: Clean and Prep 6 Sanitary Sewer Manholes as Directed by the Client Miksis Services, Inc. (MSI) proposes to clean, stop all leaks, shag all joints, remove ladders, and prep for epoxy (100% solid epoxy).
6 Sewer Manholes – Epoxy Prep and Application
Clean & Prep
Equipment, Material, & Labor $92,180.00
Apply Epoxy
Equipment, Material, & Labor $28,585.00
Total $120,765.00
6 Sewer Manholes – Quantitative Measurements
1. West 2nd (Apt) 6’ x 6’ x 18.85 = 113.10 + 29.28 (Base) = 141.38 ~ 141
2. West 2nd Foothill 6’ x 8’ x 25.14 = 113.10 + 50.27 (Base) = 138.24 ~ 138
3. West 1st / Franklin 6’ x 6’ x 18.85 = 113.10 + 28.28 (Base) = 141.38 ~ 141
4. Jefferson / Haehl 6’ x 4’ x 18.85 = 113.10 + 28.28 (Base) = 141.38 ~ 141
5. Jefferson School 4’ x 4’ x 12.57 = 50.28 + 12.57 (Base) = 62.85 ~ 62
6. Wallace / Furber 6’ x 8’ x 25.14 = 113.10 + 50.27 (Base) = 138.24 ~ 138 Total Sq. Ft. 761 Sq. Ft.
28 3535A Quote
Dba Rapid Rooter
P.O. Box 591-I, Healdsburg, CA 95448-0590
1-888-UNPLUGU (707) 433-8053 FAX (707) 433-8085
Email: [email protected] Website: www.unplugu.com
Contractor’s License 544530, A, C-36, HAZ, D6, D12
D R | f c P a g e 2 | 2
Conditions and Assumptions:
MSI will be allowed unlimited and uninterrupted access to the job site. Costs associated with permit(s), bond(s), and license(s) are excluded. Any changes, modifications, or additions to this scope of work will require a change order. This job is bid at a prevailing wage.
MSI estimated that the repair duration for each manhole will be two days, covering preparations, hydro blasting, cleaning, leak sealing, and application of the 100% solid epoxy.
Thank you for the opportunity to present our proposal for this project. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments. This quote will remain valid for 30 days.
Gary Miksis
President
Miksis Services, Inc.
Authorized Signature for Bid Acceptance Date
29 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item: F.4
Meeting Date: July 23, 2025
Agenda Section:
Consent
Staff Contact:
Derrick Montanye, Public Works Director
Agenda Item Title:
Consider the Roadway Improvement Project list for fiscal year 2025/2026 funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):
Adopt A Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Adopting a List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017” ________________________________________________________________________________________ Background:
In April 2017, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide.
SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary:
The City must adopt annually, by resolution, a list of proposed projects to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement.
In the current Fiscal Year (FY 2024/2025) the City Council listed the Clark Avenue Rehabilitation project to receive SB 1 funds. Clark Avenue Rehabilitation design and construction funding is anticipated to come from several years’ worth of SB 1 funds unless alternative funds are identified. The Clark Avenue Rehabilitation project is utilizing SB 1 funds beginning in FY 2023/2024 and is currently at 50% design. The Public Works and Facilities Subcommittee recommended the Jefferson Street Rehabilitation Projects (Phases 1 and 2) for future SB 1 funding after the completion of Clark Avenue Rehabilitation.
SB 1 Projects
The Clark Avenue Rehabilitation Project was relisted for SB 1 funds in FY 2024/2025 to allow remaining FY 2024/2025 and future funds to be combined. Clark Avenue, from South Street to Blair Street, will be reconstructed and/or overlain as needed to restore the surface. This project is expected to have a functional life of 30 years once complete. The project is expected to be complete by the autumn of 2026 assuming SB 1 funding is adequate. The project must be relisted for SB 1 funds in FY 2025/2026 to continue.
The Jefferson Street Rehabilitation Projects will be added to the SB 1 list in future fiscal years. ________________________________________________________________________________________ 30 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: June 11, 2025
Options:
1. Reject the SB 1 list; or
2. Amend the SB 1 list; or
3. Provide alternative direction to City staff.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:
The SB 1 project list was considered by the Public Work & Facilities Subcommittee on May 28, 2024. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:
Adoption of the proposed resolution will make the City eligible to receive about $243,994 in SB 1 funds for FY 2025/2026.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Exhibit A – Proposed Project List
31 CITY OF CLOVERDALE
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, in April 2017, Governor Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017), to address significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, in April 2017, Governor Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017), to address significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, the City of Cloverdale must annually adopt by resolution a list of proposed projects to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which includes a description and location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Cloverdale must annually adopt by resolution a list of proposed projects to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which includes a description and location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the Clark Avenue Rehabilitation Project, from South Street to Blair Street, was relisted for SB 1 funding in FY 2024/2025 and must continue to be listed for FY 2025/2026 to allow remaining and future funds to be combined. The project involves reconstruction and/or overlaying as needed to restore the surface, has an estimated useful life of 30 years, and is expected to be completed by autumn of 2026 assuming SB 1 funding is adequate; and
WHEREAS, adoption of this resolution will make the City of Cloverdale eligible to receive approximately $243,994 in SB 1 funds for FY 2025/2026;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cloverdale hereby adopts the list of projects for FY 2025/2026 funded by SB 1 as detailed in Exhibit A.
The foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ 2025 by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: (_) Councilmember Brigham, Councilmember Cruz, Councilmember Turner, Noes: (_) None
Absent: (_)
Abstaining: (_) None
32 APPROVED: ATTEST:
_________________________ __________________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Attachments:
Exhibit A – Proposed Project List
33 Agency Program Title Description
City of Cloverdale Local Streets and Roads Program Clark Avenue Rehabilitation Project This project will include: Document Preparation, Environmental Study/Documents, Cost Estimating City of Cloverdale Local Streets and Roads Program Clark Avenue Rehabilitation Project This project will include: ADA Curb Ramp Rehab/Repair (Existing), ADA Curb Ramp Installation (New), Paving and/or Striping Installation (New Safety), Pavement Rehab/Repair (Existing), Paving and/or Striping Rehab/Repair (Existing Safety)
City of Cloverdale Local Streets and Roads Program Clark Avenue Rehabilitation Project This project will include: Preliminary Design, Pavement Rehab/Repair (Existing) | PreConstruction is to begin in FY 23-24.
34 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item: F.5
Meeting Date: July 23, 2025
Agenda Section:
Consent
Staff Contact:
Kevin Thompson, City Manager
Agenda Item Title:
Consider action to declare all weeds growing within the City to be a public nuisance and declaring the City’s intention to remove and abate the same upon specified private properties under and in accordance with the provisions of the City of Cloverdale Municipal Code Chapter 8.16, entitled Weed Abatement ________________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):
Adopt a Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale declaring all weeds growing within the city to be a public nuisance and declaring its intention to remove and abate the same upon specified private properties under and in accordance with the provisions of the City of Cloverdale Municipal Code Chapter 8.16, entitled weed abatement.”
_______________________________________________________________________________________ Background:
On an annual basis, the Cloverdale Fire Protection District (“Fire District”) conducts an extensive inspection and outreach process with local property owners within the City to ensure that weeds and other grasses are maintained in such as manner to reduce potential fire hazards. The Fire District sends property owners with high weeds or otherwise unmaintained vegetation a letter, “requesting that they mow, dice or otherwise manage any excess weeds on their property.”
According to Municipal Code Section 8.16.010, “Weeds growing upon and adjacent to private property within the city, which are allowed by the owners thereof to flourish and grow in such a manner that they constitute a health, fire and safety menace to the citizens of the City may constitute a nuisance which should be abated.” The Fire District conducts follow up inspections on a citywide basis and any properties that are not in compliance with City Code will be placed on a list that is provided to the City. The Fire District subsequently submits a letter to the City requesting that that the City Council pass a Resolution declaring that certain properties are not in compliance with Chapter 8.16 of the City of Cloverdale Municipal Code regarding weed abatement. The Fire District requests that the City council adopt a resolution declaring non-compliant properties a public nuisance and that the City Council approve removal of the weeds from the identified non-compliant properties, including driveways and adjacent sidewalks as necessary.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary:
Due to the significant amount of vegetation growth this year, the Fire District conducted a second set of property inspections and subsequently sent a second round of letters to property owners with high or otherwise unmaintained weeds on their property. It is the responsibility of owners or agents in charge or control of any premises within the City to remove weeds in such a manner that they do not become a nuisance. Whenever any such weeds are growing upon any property within the City, the Council may by resolution declare the same to be a public nuisance. While the Fire district is actively working with property owners to encourage weed abatement, Fire Chief Jason Jenkins has requested that the City Council declare weed conditions at specified locations throughout the City a public nuisance and that City Council approve 35 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: July 23, 2025
removal of the weeds from these properties. The attached resolution (Attachment 1) sets out a general description of such weeds and their location to give all property owners or agents affected notice of the required abatement.
The Council may provide for the removal of the nuisance by rotovating, discing or mowing of weeds, or any other method at the discretion of the Fire Chief or his representative or any other authorized person, unless the council shall specifically direct otherwise. The attached resolution sets a time and place for the hearing of any objections to the proposed destruction or removal of such weeds by the City and states that the expenses associated with such removal, including administrative costs, shall constitute a lien and may be assessed upon the lot or lands from which the weeds have been destroyed or removed. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Options:
1. Approve Resolution as drafted
2. Amend and approve attached resolution; or
3. Provide additional direction to staff.
____________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:
N/A
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:
Expenses including weed abatement and incidental administrative costs shall constitute a lien and may be assessed upon the property.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Fire District Letter – Non-Compliant Properties
36 CITY OF CLOVERDALE
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2025
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE DECLARING
ALL WEEDS GROWING WITHIN THE CITY TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REMOVE AND ABATE THE SAME UPON
SPECIFIED PRIVATE PROPERTIES UNDER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.16,
ENTITLED WEED ABATEMENT
WHEREAS, Chapter 8.16 of the City of Cloverdale Municipal Code, states “weeds growing upon and adjacent to private property within the City, which are allowed by the owners thereof to flourish and grow in such a manner that they constitute a health, fire and safety menace to the citizens of the City which should be abated”; and
WHEREAS, Cloverdale Municipal Code section 8.16.030(B) provides that the City Council upon recommendation by the Fire Chief, recommend and order such nuisance to be abated by having the weeds removed through “rotovating, discing or mowing of weeds on certain properties”; and WHEREAS, Jason Jenkins, Fire Chief of the Cloverdale Fire District submitted a letter to the City attached to and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A”, reporting that the Cloverdale Fire Protection District had conducted inspections and found that certain specified properties within the city limits were not in compliance with the City’s Weed Abatement code; and
WHEREAS, the certain properties within the City of Cloverdale identified in Exhibit “A” remain in violation of the weed abatement ordinance, constituting a public nuisance due to weed conditions in the front, rear and side yards and pose a risk to public safety by creating a fire hazard:
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cloverdale finds that the weeds growing on the private properties identified in Exhibit “A”, constitute a public nuisance and pose a risk to public safety by creating a fire hazard and does hereby declare said conditions to be a public nuisance, and orders said nuisance conditions to be abated by the destruction or removal of the weeds; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, if the weeds are not abated by removal or destruction prior to August 7, 2025, they will be removed and the nuisance abated by the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a hearing on any objections to the proposed destruction or removal of such weeds by the City is hereby set for Wednesday, August 13, 2025, at or soon after 6:00 p.m. in the Cloverdale Performing Arts Center located at 209 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, California.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to mail a written Notice to Destroy Weeds in the form set forth in Cloverdale Municipal Code Section 8.16.050 to each of the assessed owners of record of the subject properties identified in Exhibit “A”, along with a copy of this resolution ordering the destruction or removal of the weeds and setting the date of Wednesday, August 13, 2025, at or soon after 6:00 p.m., for hearing all objections from the assessed owners as listed in this 37 resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the expense of destruction and/or removal of the weeds by the City, including administrative costs, shall constitute a lien on the respective properties and may be assessed on the lot or land where the weeds have been destroyed or removed.
It is hereby certified that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on this 23rd day of July, 2025, by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES in favor of:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSED:
APPROVED: ATTESTED:
___________________________ ______________________________ Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Exhibit “A” – Fire District Letter – Non-Compliant Properties 38 39
City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 1 of 8 124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707-894-2521
www.cloverdale.net
MINUTES - DRAFT
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND JOINT MEETING OF THE CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WEDNESDAY, MAY 14, 2025
CLOSED SESSION - 5 PM
CLOVERDALE CITY HALL
124 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD, CLOVERDALE, CA, 95425
OPEN SESSION 6:00 PM
CLOVERDALE PERFORMING ART CENTER
209 N. CLOVERDALE BOULEVARD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM
1. OPENING CLOSED SESSION
1.A Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m.
1.B Roll Call
Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern
Absent: None.
1.C Closed Session Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions) None.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION AGENDA:
None.
3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION TO HEAR THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S):
Mayor Lands recessed to Closed Session at 5:01 p.m.
3.A REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: APN 001-332-022
City Negotiator: City Manager & City Attorney
Property Owner: Boys and Girls Club of Sonoma-Marin
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Item was received and filed.
40 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 2 of 8
3.B REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: APN 001-173-006
City Negotiator: City Manager & City Attorney
Property Owner: Sava Foundation
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Item was received and filed.
Mayor Lands adjourned Closed Session at 5:39 p.m.
OPEN SESSION - 6:00 PM
A. OPENING PUBLIC SESSION
A.1 Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 6 p.m.
A.2 Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Lands led the pledge of allegiance.
A.3 Roll Call
Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern
Absent: None.
A.4. Report Out on Closed Session
None.
A.5 Conflict of Interest Declaration
None.
A.6 Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
None.
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
B.1 Verbal Comments
Daniel Frankston spoke regarding the Mobile Home Rent Ordinance B.2 Written Comments
None.
C. STUDENT LIAISON REPORT
C.1 Liaison Gallego Written Report
Liaison Gallego reported and provided feedback on the Student Liaison program D. PROCLAMATIONS
D.1 Municipal Clerks Week
Mayor Lands read the proclamation.
41 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 3 of 8 Cloverdale City Clerk / PIO Maloney received the proclamation and addressed the Council.
Councilmembers provided comments.
E. PRESENTATIONS
E.1 Downtown Boulevard Walkability and Streetscape Community Survey Results Public Information Officer Maloney presented and Public Works Superintendent Galvan responded to Councilmember inquiries.
Council provided direction to move the item to Infrastructure for project review.
F. CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made Vice Mayor Wheeler, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive reading of the text and adopt the Consent Calendar.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
F.1 Approval of Minutes - April 9, 2025 (Draft)
Action: Approved as submitted.
F.2 Soda Springs Ranch Trail Development budget and Agreement with Redwood Trails Alliance Action: Resolution Approved
RESOLUTION NO. 020-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING THE EXPENDITURES FOR TRAIL DEVELOPMENT AND
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SODA SPRINGS RANCH OPEN SPACE PRESERVE AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT WITH REDWOOD TRAILS
ALLIANCE
F.3 Award of Contract to Well Industries Inc. for Construction of Replacement Wells 7 and 8 at the Cloverdale Water Treatment Plant
Action: Resolution Approved
RESOLUTION NO. 021-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO WELL INDUSTRIES INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $612,736.00 FOR THE REPLACEMENT WELLS 7 AND 8 PROJECT AT THE CLOVERDALE WATER TREATMENT PLANT, APPROVING A 10% CONSTRUCTION
CONTINGENCY, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
AND RELATED DOCUMENTS
42 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 4 of 8 F.4 Ordinance Amending Section 3.04.020 of the Cloverdale Municipal Code Action: First Reading and Ordinance Introduction Approved INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE AMENDING SECTION 3.04.020 “OFFICERS AUTHORIZED TO SIGNPROCEDURE” OF THE CLOVERDALE MUNICIPAL CODE BY TITLE ONLY G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
H. NEW BUSINESS
H.1 Ordinance Designating Fire Hazard Severity Zones
City Attorney Mog presented and Fire District Chief Jenkins provided comments and responded to Councilmember inquiries.
Public Comment:
William Wagy provided comments and concerns regarding the area near his residence.
Susie Cummings provided comments regarding partnerships and “Fire Wise” educational opportunities.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Wheeler, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive first reading of the text and introduce:
AN ORDINANCE TO DESIGNATE FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES WITHIN THE LOCAL
RESPONSIBILITY AREA AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION (CALFIRE) PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 51178
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
H.2 A Professional Services Agreement with West Yost for the Update of The City of Cloverdale Water Master Plan in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $266,400 Public Works Director Montanye introduced the item.
Public Comment:
Susie Cummings provided inquiries.
City Manager Thompson responded to Public Comments.
A motion was made by Councilmember Laskey, seconded by Vice Mayor Wheeler, to waive reading of the text and adopt:
43 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 5 of 8 RESOLUTION 022-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH WEST YOST FOR THE UPDATE OF THE UPDATE OF THE 2010 WATER MASTER PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
H.3 Declaring Intent to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments, Preliminarily Approve the Engineer’s Report for FY 2024-25 for the City of Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District and Set the Time and Date of the Public Hearing for Zone 1-7 City Manager Thompson introduced the item and Consultant Melman presented.
Staff and Consultant Melman responded to Councilmember inquiries.
Vice Mayor Wheeler left the dais at 7:05 p.m.
A motion was made by Councilmember Morgenstern, seconded by Councilmember Marquez, to waive reading of the text and adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 023-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE DECLARING INTENT TO LEVY AND COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FY 2025-26 FOR THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND SETTING THE TIME AND DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONE 3
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (4) Mayor Lands, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (1) Vice Mayor Wheeler
Absent: (0)
Vice Mayor Wheeler returned to the dais 7:07 p.m.
Mayor Lands and Councilmember Marquez left the dais at 7:07 p.m.
A motion was made by Councilmember Laskey, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive reading of the text and adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 024-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE DECLARING INTENT TO LEVY AND COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FY 2025-26 FOR THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, AND SETTING THE TIME AND DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONES 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, AND 7 44 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 6 of 8 The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (3) Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (2) Mayor Lands, Councilmember Marquez
Absent: (0)
Mayor Lands and Councilmember Marquez returned to the dais at 7:08 p.m.
H.4 Second reading of an Ordinance Amending Sections of the Cloverdale Municipal Code (CMC) regulating vacant commercial properties in Cloverdale City Attorney Mog introduced the item and Councilmember Marquez proposed language amendments and the Council discussed.
No motion for amendments were made.
Public Comment: None
A motion was made by Councilmember Morgenstern, seconded by Vice Mayor Wheeler, to waive second reading of the text and adopt:
ORDINANCE NO. 060-2025 ENTITLED: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ADDING CHAPTER 8.40, VACANT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY REGULATIONS.
TO THE CLOVERDALE MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE VACANT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
IN CLOVERDALE
Yes: (4) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Morgenstern No: (1) Councilmember Marquez
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
H.5 Potential 2025 Discussion topics for the Sonoma County Mayors and Councilmembers City Manager Thompson introduced the item and Council discussed.
Public Comment(s):
None.
Student Liaison Gallego responded to Mayor inquiries.
A motion was made by Councilmember Morgenstern, seconded by Vice Mayor Wheeler, to identify and prioritize the City of Cloverdale’s Top Three Regional Issues for Presentation at the Upcoming Sonoma County Mayors and Councilmembers Association (SCMCA) Board of Directors Special Meeting as:
1) Homelessness and Mental Health Services
2) Wildfire Prevention and Vegetation Management
3) Substance Use Treatment and Social Services
The motion carried by the following vote:
45 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 7 of 8 Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
I. POTTER VALLEY PROJECT (PVP)
Mayor Lands introduced the item and reported on a recent meeting with Sonoma Water.
Mayor Lands provided updates on the PVP and upcoming meetings.
Vice Mayor Wheeler provided comments on the PVP Ad Hoc.
Councilmember Morgenstern provided appreciation to Mayor Lands and Vice Mayor Wheeler.
Councilmember Marquez inquired on the current PVP Ad Hoc, the potential for a new Water Sustainability Ad Hoc, and clear Cloverdale specific PVP goal setting.
Mayor Lands and Councilmember Marquez had a dialogue and Public Works Director Montanye and City Attorney Mog responded to Councilmember inquiries.
Councilmembers provided additional comments.
J. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
None.
Subcommittee Agendas, Approved Minutes, and Media are available at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter.
K. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Councilmember Marquez reported on the Zero Waste Symposium.
Councilmember Laskey reported on the Welcoming Home Honor Flag hosted by the American Legion and the Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians’ Ribbon Cutting and MMIP Awareness Event at Bi’Du Khaale, and the DogGonIt ribbon cutting event, and provided information on the re-grand opening for Ace Hardware.
Vice Mayor Wheeler commended the Public Works and Parks divisions for preparing the downtown area ready for Friday Night Live, and Narcan training Mayor Lands reported on the July 4th parade and WonderBread5 concert at the downtown Plaza, Alexander Valley Health Center updates, overdose deaths affecting the Cloverdale community and establishment of a program for Narcan (Naloxone) to be available throughout the City, and recommendations for the Pride Month Proclamation date and Pride flag raising ceremony.
Council provided direction to Staff.
46 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 8 of 8 L. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS, LETTERS OF SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
L.1 Letter of Support - Hometown Grant Program
None.
L.2 Letter of Support - St. Peter's SVdP Conference
None.
M. CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None.
N. COUNCIL DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Mobile Home Zoning to the Planning Commission
O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lands adjourned the meeting at 8:29 p.m. to the next regular meeting of the Cloverdale City Council scheduled for May 28, 2025.
APPROVED ON:
________________________________
Mike Maloney, City Clerk
47 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 1 of 8 124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707-894-2521
www.cloverdale.net
MINUTES - DRAFT
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND JOINT MEETING OF THE CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WEDNESDAY, MAY 14, 2025
CLOSED SESSION - 5 PM
CLOVERDALE CITY HALL
124 N. CLOVERDALE BLVD, CLOVERDALE, CA, 95425
OPEN SESSION 6:00 PM
CLOVERDALE PERFORMING ART CENTER
209 N. CLOVERDALE BOULEVARD, CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM
1. OPENING CLOSED SESSION
1.A Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m.
1.B Roll Call
Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern
Absent: None.
1.C Closed Session Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions) None.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION AGENDA:
None.
3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION TO HEAR THE FOLLOWING ITEM(S):
Mayor Lands recessed to Closed Session at 5:01 p.m.
3.A REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: APN 001-332-022
City Negotiator: City Manager & City Attorney
Property Owner: Boys and Girls Club of Sonoma-Marin
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Item was received and filed.
48 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 2 of 8
3.B REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: APN 001-173-006
City Negotiator: City Manager & City Attorney
Property Owner: Sava Foundation
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Item was received and filed.
Mayor Lands adjourned Closed Session at 5:39 p.m.
OPEN SESSION - 6:00 PM
A. OPENING PUBLIC SESSION
A.1 Call to Order
Mayor Lands called the meeting to order at 6 p.m.
A.2 Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Lands led the pledge of allegiance.
A.3 Roll Call
Present: Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern
Absent: None.
A.4. Report Out on Closed Session
None.
A.5 Conflict of Interest Declaration
None.
A.6 Agenda Review (Changes and/or Deletions)
None.
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
B.1 Verbal Comments
Daniel Frankston spoke regarding the Mobile Home Rent Ordinance B.2 Written Comments
None.
C. STUDENT LIAISON REPORT
C.1 Liaison Gallego Written Report
Liaison Gallego reported and provided feedback on the Student Liaison program D. PROCLAMATIONS
D.1 Municipal Clerks Week
Mayor Lands read the proclamation.
49 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 3 of 8 Cloverdale City Clerk / PIO Maloney received the proclamation and addressed the Council.
Councilmembers provided comments.
E. PRESENTATIONS
E.1 Downtown Boulevard Walkability and Streetscape Community Survey Results Public Information Officer Maloney presented and Public Works Superintendent Galvan responded to Councilmember inquiries.
Council provided direction to move the item to Infrastructure for project review.
F. CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made Vice Mayor Wheeler, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive reading of the text and adopt the Consent Calendar.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
F.1 Approval of Minutes - April 9, 2025 (Draft)
Action: Approved as submitted.
F.2 Soda Springs Ranch Trail Development budget and Agreement with Redwood Trails Alliance Action: Resolution Approved
RESOLUTION NO. 020-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLOVERDALE APPROVING THE EXPENDITURES FOR TRAIL DEVELOPMENT AND
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SODA SPRINGS RANCH OPEN SPACE PRESERVE AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT WITH REDWOOD TRAILS
ALLIANCE
F.3 Award of Contract to Well Industries Inc. for Construction of Replacement Wells 7 and 8 at the Cloverdale Water Treatment Plant
Action: Resolution Approved
RESOLUTION NO. 021-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO WELL INDUSTRIES INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $612,736.00 FOR THE REPLACEMENT WELLS 7 AND 8 PROJECT AT THE CLOVERDALE WATER TREATMENT PLANT, APPROVING A 10% CONSTRUCTION
CONTINGENCY, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
AND RELATED DOCUMENTS
50 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 4 of 8 F.4 Ordinance Amending Section 3.04.020 of the Cloverdale Municipal Code Action: First Reading and Ordinance Introduction Approved INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE AMENDING SECTION 3.04.020 “OFFICERS AUTHORIZED TO SIGNPROCEDURE” OF THE CLOVERDALE MUNICIPAL CODE BY TITLE ONLY G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
H. NEW BUSINESS
H.1 Ordinance Designating Fire Hazard Severity Zones
City Attorney Mog presented and Fire District Chief Jenkins provided comments and responded to Councilmember inquiries.
Public Comment:
William Wagy provided comments and concerns regarding the area near his residence.
Susie Cummings provided comments regarding partnerships and “Fire Wise” educational opportunities.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Wheeler, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive first reading of the text and introduce:
AN ORDINANCE TO DESIGNATE FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES WITHIN THE LOCAL
RESPONSIBILITY AREA AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION (CALFIRE) PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 51178
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
H.2 A Professional Services Agreement with West Yost for the Update of The City of Cloverdale Water Master Plan in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $266,400 Public Works Director Montanye introduced the item.
Public Comment:
Susie Cummings provided inquiries.
City Manager Thompson responded to Public Comments.
A motion was made by Councilmember Laskey, seconded by Vice Mayor Wheeler, to waive reading of the text and adopt:
51 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 5 of 8 RESOLUTION 022-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH WEST YOST FOR THE UPDATE OF THE UPDATE OF THE 2010 WATER MASTER PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
H.3 Declaring Intent to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments, Preliminarily Approve the Engineer’s Report for FY 2024-25 for the City of Cloverdale Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District and Set the Time and Date of the Public Hearing for Zone 1-7 City Manager Thompson introduced the item and Consultant Melman presented.
Staff and Consultant Melman responded to Councilmember inquiries.
Vice Mayor Wheeler left the dais at 7:05 p.m.
A motion was made by Councilmember Morgenstern, seconded by Councilmember Marquez, to waive reading of the text and adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 023-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE DECLARING INTENT TO LEVY AND COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FY 2025-26 FOR THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND SETTING THE TIME AND DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONE 3
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (4) Mayor Lands, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (1) Vice Mayor Wheeler
Absent: (0)
Vice Mayor Wheeler returned to the dais 7:07 p.m.
Mayor Lands and Councilmember Marquez left the dais at 7:07 p.m.
A motion was made by Councilmember Laskey, seconded by Councilmember Morgenstern, to waive reading of the text and adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 024-2025 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE DECLARING INTENT TO LEVY AND COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVE THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FY 2025-26 FOR THE CITY OF
CLOVERDALE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, AND SETTING THE TIME AND DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONES 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, AND 7 52 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 6 of 8 The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: (3) Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (2) Mayor Lands, Councilmember Marquez
Absent: (0)
Mayor Lands and Councilmember Marquez returned to the dais at 7:08 p.m.
H.4 Second reading of an Ordinance Amending Sections of the Cloverdale Municipal Code (CMC) regulating vacant commercial properties in Cloverdale City Attorney Mog introduced the item and Councilmember Marquez proposed language amendments and the Council discussed.
No motion for amendments were made.
Public Comment: None
A motion was made by Councilmember Morgenstern, seconded by Vice Mayor Wheeler, to waive second reading of the text and adopt:
ORDINANCE NO. 060-2025 ENTITLED: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE ADDING CHAPTER 8.40, VACANT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY REGULATIONS.
TO THE CLOVERDALE MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE VACANT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
IN CLOVERDALE
Yes: (4) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Morgenstern No: (1) Councilmember Marquez
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
H.5 Potential 2025 Discussion topics for the Sonoma County Mayors and Councilmembers City Manager Thompson introduced the item and Council discussed.
Public Comment(s):
None.
Student Liaison Gallego responded to Mayor inquiries.
A motion was made by Councilmember Morgenstern, seconded by Vice Mayor Wheeler, to identify and prioritize the City of Cloverdale’s Top Three Regional Issues for Presentation at the Upcoming Sonoma County Mayors and Councilmembers Association (SCMCA) Board of Directors Special Meeting as:
1) Homelessness and Mental Health Services
2) Wildfire Prevention and Vegetation Management
3) Substance Use Treatment and Social Services
The motion carried by the following vote:
53 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 7 of 8 Yes: (5) Mayor Lands, Vice Mayor Wheeler, Councilmembers: Laskey, Marquez, Morgenstern No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
I. POTTER VALLEY PROJECT (PVP)
Mayor Lands introduced the item and reported on a recent meeting with Sonoma Water.
Mayor Lands provided updates on the PVP and upcoming meetings.
Vice Mayor Wheeler provided comments on the PVP Ad Hoc.
Councilmember Morgenstern provided appreciation to Mayor Lands and Vice Mayor Wheeler.
Councilmember Marquez inquired on the current PVP Ad Hoc, the potential for a new Water Sustainability Ad Hoc, and clear Cloverdale specific PVP goal setting.
Mayor Lands and Councilmember Marquez had a dialogue and Public Works Director Montanye and City Attorney Mog responded to Councilmember inquiries.
Councilmembers provided additional comments.
J. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
None.
Subcommittee Agendas, Approved Minutes, and Media are available at www.cloverdale.net/agendacenter.
K. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Councilmember Marquez reported on the Zero Waste Symposium.
Councilmember Laskey reported on the Welcoming Home Honor Flag hosted by the American Legion and the Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians’ Ribbon Cutting and MMIP Awareness Event at Bi’Du Khaale, and the DogGonIt ribbon cutting event, and provided information on the re-grand opening for Ace Hardware.
Vice Mayor Wheeler commended the Public Works and Parks divisions for preparing the downtown area ready for Friday Night Live, and Narcan training Mayor Lands reported on the July 4th parade and WonderBread5 concert at the downtown Plaza, Alexander Valley Health Center updates, overdose deaths affecting the Cloverdale community and establishment of a program for Narcan (Naloxone) to be available throughout the City, and recommendations for the Pride Month Proclamation date and Pride flag raising ceremony.
Council provided direction to Staff.
54 City Council Meeting Minutes – May 14, 2025 - Page 8 of 8 L. LEGISLATIVE REPORTS, LETTERS OF SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
L.1 Letter of Support - Hometown Grant Program
None.
L.2 Letter of Support - St. Peter's SVdP Conference
None.
M. CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None.
N. COUNCIL DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Mobile Home Zoning to the Planning Commission
O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Lands adjourned the meeting at 8:29 p.m. to the next regular meeting of the Cloverdale City Council scheduled for May 28, 2025.
APPROVED ON:
________________________________
Mike Maloney, City Clerk
55 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item:
Meeting Date:
G.1
July 23, 2025
Agenda Section:
Public Hearing
Staff Contact:
Susie Holmes, Finance Director
Agenda Item Title:
Consider a Resolution Establishing and Updating the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services and Repealing Previously Adopted and Conflicting Fees and Charges for Such Services ________________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):
Adopt the Resolution Entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale Establishing and Updating the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services and repealing the previously adopted and conflicting fees and charges for such services.”
________________________________________________________________________________________ Background:
The City of Cloverdale has maintained a policy of recovering the cost of providing miscellaneous City services and regulatory activities so that the costs are borne by the direct beneficiaries of the services and regulatory activities, rather than by the City's General Fund. The City Council last updated the City's Fee Schedule by adoption of Resolution No. 032-2024 on June 26, 2024. The Master Fee Schedule is updated annually to ensure that fees are adjusted to reflect the current cost of delivery of services. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary:
City staff conducted a comprehensive review and recalculation of applicable fees. Each minimum fee was determined based on the estimated staff time required, multiplied by the current billing rate for the relevant position processing the request.
With the implementation of OpenGov for budgeting and workforce development, staff now have improved capability to monitor and track the true cost of service provision.
Department heads audited position classifications and time allocations, which led to both increases and decreases in certain charges. These adjustments reflect shifts in staffing and service delivery efficiency.
The updated Master Fee Schedule and corresponding resolution are attached. The proposed schedule identifies the minimum charge for each service. If a service request requires more than the estimated minimum processing time, additional costs will be recovered on a time and materials basis, as outlined in the schedule. Percentage changes for all adjusted fees are clearly indicated.
Notice of the Council’s intent to consider these updates has been duly provided in accordance with applicable legal requirements. In compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act, supporting cost data and documentation have been made available at the City Clerk’s Office at least ten days prior to this meeting. ________________________________________________________________________________________ 56 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: July 23, 2025
Options:
1. Reject Resolution and continue to charge currently established fees;
2. Revise the Resolution as presented and adopt the revised version; or
3. Provide alternative direction to staff.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:
None.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Budget/Financial Impact:
Adopting the updated Master Fee Schedule will enhance the City’s ability to recover the actual cost of providing services to residents, applicants, businesses, and developers. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Exhibit A - Master Fee Schedule
3. Public Hearing Notification
57 CITY OF CLOVERDALE
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE
ESTABLISHING AND UPDATING THE SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR
CITY SERVICES AND REPEALING PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED AND CONFLICTING
FEES AND CHARGES FOR SUCH SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cloverdale (“City”) has maintained a policy of recovering up to the full cost of providing miscellaneous voluntary City services and regulatory activities from those persons utilizing them, so that such costs are borne by the direct beneficiaries of such services and regulatory activities rather than by the City General Fund, pursuant to applicable law; and WHEREAS, the City Council last updated the City’s schedule of such services and regulatory activities by Resolution No. 032-2024 on June 26, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City Council last updated the City’s schedule of its engineering and planning service fees by Resolution No. 032-2024 on June 26, 2024; and
WHEREAS, City staff have recently completed a review of City service fees and charges, including an analysis of the personnel, maintenance and operation costs, professional services, capital costs, and time, materials, and equipment required to perform such services; and WHEREAS, based on the analysis of such fees and charges, staff have estimated cost of the time, materials and equipment in light of the present costs of providing the services that such fees and charges are intended to recover and staff’s analysis of such present service costs has resulted in recalculated service fees and charges, as set forth in the Fee Schedule attached hereto and made part of this Resolution as Exhibit A (“Fee Schedule”);
WHEREAS, the current Staff Billing Rates for various City services and activities are attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution as a portion of Exhibit A (“Staff Billing Rates”); and WHEREAS, in adopting the fees and charges for City services as set forth in this Resolution, the City Council is exercising its powers under Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, Section 66014 of the California Government Code, and other applicable law; and WHEREAS, none of the fees and charges set forth in the Fee Schedule adopted by this Resolution is a “tax” as defined in Section 1, paragraph (e) of Article XIIIC of the California Constitution because such fees and charges are imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payer that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable cost to the local government of providing the service or product; such fees and charges are imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payer that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable cost to the local government of providing the service or product; and/or such fees and charges are imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders 58
and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof; and/or such fees and charges are imposed as a condition of property development; and
WHEREAS, the fees and charges set forth in the schedule of fees and charges adopted by this Resolution are not subject to the requirements of Article XIIID of the California Constitution concerning property related assessments and fees pursuant to Apartment Association of Los Angeles County v. City of Los Angeles (2001) 24 Cal.4th 830, in that such fees are not applicable to incidents of property ownership, but rather to actual use of City services; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 50076, fees and charges that do not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service or regulatory activity for which the fees are charged and which are not levied for general revenue purposes are not special taxes as defined in Article 3.5 of the Government Code; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 66014, local agency fees for: zoning variances, use permits, building inspections, building permits, filing and processing applications and petitions filed with the local agency formation commission or conducting proceedings filed under the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code § 56000, et seq.), processing maps under the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code § 66410, et seq.), or planning services shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code section 65104, fees to support the work of planning agencies shall not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 65456, legislative bodies may, after adopting a specific plan, impose a specific plan fee upon persons seeking governmental approvals which are required to be consistent with the specific plan, and such fees shall, in the aggregate, defray but not exceed the cost of preparation, adoption and administration of the specific plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 65909.5, reasonable city fees for the processing of use permits, zone variances, or zone changes shall not exceed the amount reasonably required to administer the processing of such permits, zone variances or changes; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 66451.2, reasonable local agency fees for the processing of tentative, final and parcel maps shall not exceed the amount reasonably required by the agency; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 17951, city governing bodies may prescribe fees for permits, certificates or other documents required or authorized concerning implementation and enforcement of the California Building Standards Code, and such fees shall not exceed the amount reasonably required to administer or process those permits, certificates or other forms or documents, and shall not be levied for general revenue purposes; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 19132.3, city governing bodies may adopt fees for filing building permit applications, and such fees shall not exceed the amount reasonably required for the local enforcement agency to issue such permits, and shall not be levied for general revenue purposes; and
59
WHEREAS, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 19852, city governing bodies may prescribe such fees as will pay the expenses incurred by the building department in maintaining the official copy of the plans of buildings for which building permits have been issued, but such fees shall not exceed the amount reasonably required in maintaining the official copy of the plans for which building permits have been issued; and
WHEREAS, fees adopted pursuant to Government Code Sections 66014, 65104, 65456, 65909.5, and 66451.2, and Health and Safety Code Sections 17951, 19132.3, and 19852, are to be imposed pursuant to Section 66016 of the Government Code, which imposes certain procedural requirements prior to levying a new fee or service charge, or prior to approving an increase in an existing fee or service charge; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Government Code Section 66016, the fees contained in the Fee Schedule and the basis for calculating such fees constitute cost data supporting the fee increases and new fees and charges, and such cost data was available for public review and comment for ten days prior to the public hearing at which this Resolution was adopted; and WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code Section 66016, at least 14 days prior to the public hearing at which the City Council first considered adoption of the fees established by this Resolution, notice of the time and place of the hearing was mailed to eligible interested parties who filed written requests with the City for mailed notice of meetings on new or increased fees or service charges; and
WHEREAS, 10 days advance notice of the public hearing at which this Resolution was adopted was given by publication in accordance with Section 6062a of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to adopt a schedule of fees and charges, which updates certain existing fees and charges, and/or establishes certain new fees and charges based on the City's budgeted and projected costs of providing such services; and WHEREAS, the schedule of fees and the total amounts thereof, described in Exhibit "A," which is attached to and made a part of this Resolution, are hereby determined to be reasonable in that the amounts thereof do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of providing the services for which the charges and fees are made;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale as follows:
Section 1. Findings. The following findings are true and correct and adopted as the findings of the City Council:
A. The purpose of the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution is to recover up to the full, lawfully recoverable costs incurred by the City in providing various City services, and such fees and charges are not levied for general revenue purposes.
B. After consideration of the data and information regarding the costs of providing services relating to all fees and charges subject to this Resolution, including the Fee Schedule, Staff Billing Rates, all testimony received orally or in writing at or before the noticed public hearing, the agenda report and the background documents to the agenda report and all correspondence received (together, “Record”), the City Council of the City of Cloverdale approves and adopts the methods and basis of calculations of 60
the fees and charges identified in Exhibit A as establishing the reasonable estimated cost of providing such services or activities.
C. Adoption of the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution is intended to recover costs necessary to maintain such services within the City within existing service areas and is not a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines") section 15378(b)(4) (the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any specific commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment); and/or CEQA Guidelines section 15273 (statutory exemption for rates, tolls, fares and charges within an existing service area); and/or CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) (“common sense” general exemption where there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment).
D. The Record establishes that the costs listed in the Fee Schedule and the staff rates applicable to those fees and charges which are to be increased and/or established as costs incurred by the City in providing City services are reasonable estimates of the cost of providing such services, and that the revisions recommended to existing fees for such services are necessary to recover the reasonable, estimated cost of providing such services.
Section 2. Fee Schedule Adoption. The fee amounts that result from the application of the methods and basis of calculation of the Fees identified in Exhibit A to current staff billing rates specified in Exhibit B for services and activities subject to such fees are hereby imposed on the services or activities subject to such Fees at the time such services or activities are sought and/or performed by the City or its designated contractors.
Section 3. Separate Fee for Each Process. All fees set by this Resolution are for each identified process or service; additional fees shall be required for each additional process or service that is requested or required. Where fees are indicated on a per unit of measurement basis, the fee is for each identified unit or portion thereof within the indicated ranges of such units.
Section 4. Adoption of Fees.
A. Definitions.
(1) “Applicant” shall mean any person required by the Cloverdale Municipal Code or other applicable law to apply to the City seeking a permit or other approval or services or to file documents, including, but not limited to, maps, concerning proposed Development Projects within the City. “Applicant” shall also mean any person who: (i) is permitted by the Cloverdale Municipal Code or other applicable law to apply to the City seeking a permit or other approval or services or to file documents, including, but not limited to, maps, concerning proposed Development Projects within the City and who (ii) actually applies to the City seeking such permit or other approval or services or files such documents.
(2) “Development Projects” shall mean the construction, alteration or addition, other than by the City, of any building or structure within the City, and any use of land, other than by the City, including, but not limited to, subdivision of land, within the City that is subject pursuant to the Cloverdale Municipal Code or other applicable law to first seeking and obtaining from the City a permit or other approval or services or to first filing documents, including, but not limited to, maps with the City. 61
(3) “Fees” shall mean the charge or charges imposed on members of the public or Applicants to recover the costs incurred by the City in providing City services to any member of the public and development related services to Applicants.
B. Services Fees Imposed.
Fees shall be imposed on and paid by members of the public and Applicants at the times, and in the amounts, and otherwise apply and be administered as prescribed in this Resolution. The City shall accept for processing no applications or other filings that are subject to payment of Fees without the fee required pursuant to this Resolution.
C. Time for Payment of Fees.
The estimated Fees applicable to members of the public and Applicants subject to payment of Fees shall be deposited and/or be paid, upon a member of the public or an Applicant seeking or being required to seek a permit or other approval or services or filing documents, including, but not limited to, maps, concerning or related to City services and/or proposed Development Projects within the City, and upon notice from the City that a deposit for future processing is required.
D. Fee Amounts.
The fee amounts shall be as specified in the Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution.
The total Fees applicable to any City services or Development Projects that require payment of multiple Fees shall be the sum of all such Fees.
E. Use of Fee Revenue.
The revenues raised by payment of the Fees shall be used to fund the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the Fees are charged, and the fee revenues shall not be used for general revenue purposes. Fees shall be applied against the cost of providing the services for which the fees are charged. The City shall maintain a record of direct and indirect costs of providing services for City services and Development Projects subject to the deposit.
F. Deposit Maintenance.
Applicants subject to Fees in the form of a deposit must maintain deposit balances in accordance with this provision. When City service costs equal 75 percent of the deposit balance, the City shall notify the Applicant that the deposit must be increased to its original amount as prescribed in this Resolution.
After an Applicant for a Development Project subject to deposit in accordance with the Resolution has been notified City service costs equal 75 percent of the deposit balance, when the service costs equal 90 percent of the deposit balance, services for such Development Project will cease until the deposit is increased to its original amount prescribed in this Resolution, and/or City staff may recommend denial of the Development Project to the decision making body.
G. Refund of Unused Deposit Balances.
Fees other than deposit amounts are not subject to refund. If a fund balance remains in the deposit for a Development Project, and the City services for such Development Project are completed and 62
all City service costs paid from such deposit, the remaining deposit balance shall be refunded, without interest, to the Applicant.
Section 5. Subsequent Analysis and Revision of the Fees. The fees and charges set forth herein are adopted and implemented by the City Council in reliance on the Record identified above. The City may continue to conduct further study and analysis to determine whether the fees and charges for City services should be revised. When additional information is available, the City Council may review the fees and charges to determine that the amounts do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the fees and charges are charged.
Section 6. Adjustment. From time to time, as appropriate, City staff are directed to analyze the calculations contained in Exhibit A to determine whether, when applied to current staff billing rates for providing services and activities subject to the Fees, such calculations are no longer adequate to recover the reasonable estimated cost of providing such services and regulatory activities, staff are directed to return to the City Council with a new staff analysis and proposed Fee calculations for consideration and possible adoption by the City Council.
Section 7. Update of Staff Billing Rates. City staff are directed to update the calculation of the current Staff Billing Rates for services and regulatory activities subject to City fees pursuant to this Resolution and to update the current Fee Schedule and Staff Billing Rate schedule to reflect such updated rates as appropriate, and to post such updated rates and the Fee Schedule and to otherwise make the updated current fee amount information available to any interested member of the pubic.
Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. In accordance with Government Code Section 66017, all new and/or increased fees and charges upon a development project, as defined in Government Code Section 66000, which apply to the filing, accepting, reviewing, approving, or issuing of an application, permit, or entitlement to use shall be effective no sooner than 60 days following the effective date of this Resolution. All other new and/or increased fees and charges not subject to Government Code Section 66017 that are set forth in Exhibit A shall become effective immediately.
Section 9. Repealed. These fees and charges shall supersede the corresponding fees previously established and adopted by the City Council. All previously adopted and conflicting fees and charges and all resolutions, including, but not limited to, Resolution Nos. 79-2006, 042-2009 and 043-2009, 022-2011, 047-2014, 051-2016 and other actions of the City Council are hereby repealed to the extent they conflict with the contents of this Resolution.
Section 10. Severability. The individual fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution and all portions of this Resolution are severable. Should any of the fees or charges or any portion of this Resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable by a body of competent jurisdiction, then the remaining fees, charges and/or Resolution portions shall be and continue in full force and effect, except as to those fees, charges, and/or Resolution portions that have been adjudged invalid. The City Council of the City of Cloverdale hereby declares that it would have adopted each of the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution, and this Resolution and each section, subsection, clause, sentence, phrase and other portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more of the fees, charges, or sections, subsections, clauses, sentences, phrases or other portions of this Resolution may be held invalid or unconstitutional.
63
The foregoing Resolution was duly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Cloverdale at its regular meeting held on the 23rd day of July 2025 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: (x)
NOES: (x)
ABSTAIN: (x)
ABSENT: (x)
APPROVED: ATTEST:
_______________________ ____________________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
Attachment:
Exhibit A – Master Fee Schedule
64 This Fee Schedule reflects the City's minimum processing costs. City services over and above the minimum project costs specified herein are recoverable on a time and materials basis.
These costs may include, but are not limited to: attorney fees, staff time, and engineering fees.
All staff time charges are based on the current City of Cloverdale billing rates applicable to the position and department completing the service.
If the costs incurred for a project are in excess of the minimum, a deposit for future processing will be required. Failure to replenish deposits in a timely manner may delay project processing.
For any activity requiring review by the City Attorney, the applicant shall reimburse the City for actual costs incurred from the City Attorney. The Director of the applicable department shall determine the appropriate deposit to be submitted by the applicant for recovery of City Attorney costs.
Draft Schedule of Rates and Fees
Fiscal Year 2025-26
65 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Commercial Cannabis Permit Fees
Permit Type Application
Deposit Annual Fee
2025 2025
Commercial Cannabis Cultivation Permit Type Application Deposit Annual Fee Outdoor Cottage - 25 Plants $2,808.50 $661.70 $2,808.50 $661.70 0% Outdoor Specialty - 5,000 sq. ft. or 50 Plants $2,808.50 $3,308.50 $2,808.50 $3,308.50 0% Outdoor Small - 5,001 - 10,000 sq. ft. $2,808.50 $6,617.00 $2,808.50 $6,617.00 0% Indoor Cottage - 500 sq. ft. $2,808.50 $1,654.25 $2,808.50 $1,654.25 0% Indoor Specialty - 501 - 5,000 sq. ft. $2,808.50 $3,308.50 $2,808.50 $3,308.50 0% Indoor Small - 5,001 - 10,000 sq. ft. $2,808.50 $6,617.00 $2,808.50 $6,617.00 0% Mixed Light Cottage - 2,500 sq. ft. $2,808.50 $1,654.25 $2,808.50 $1,654.25 0% Mixed Light Specialty - 2,501 - 5,000 sq. ft. $2,808.50 $3,308.50 $2,808.50 $3,308.50 0% Mixed Light Small - 5,001 - 10,000 sq. ft. $2,808.50 $6,617.00 $2,808.50 $6,617.00 0% Commercial Nursery Permit $2,808.50 $6,617.00 $2,808.50 $6,617.00 0% Other Commercial Cannabis Permit Types
Commercial Delivery Service Permit $2,808.50 $4,615.00 $2,808.50 $4,615.00 0% Commercial Distribution Permit (Inside City Limits) $2,808.50 $6,257.00 $2,808.50 $6,257.00 0% Commercial Manufacturing Permit $2,808.50 $6,257.00 $2,808.50 $6,257.00 0% Commercial Testing Permit $2,808.50 $4,037.00 $2,808.50 $4,037.00 0% Microbusiness $2,808.50 $6,257.00 $2,808.50 $6,257.00 0% Commercial Cannabis Dispensary
Application Phase 1 - Background Check Fee per Operator $296.00 $296.00 Application Phase 2 - Proposal Submission, Ranking & Recommendation $5,182.00 $5,182.00 Annual Commercial Dispensary Permit $8,410.50 $8,410.50 0% Dispensary Total $5,478.00 $8,410.50 $5,478.00 $8,410.50 *Fee does not include Audit Fee
Background Check Fee per Operator/Employee (Required for all Permit Types) $296.00 $296.00 Cannabis Audit per §3.46.210 of the municipal code $10,000 Deposit $10,000.00 0% 66 City of Cloverdale
2024-25 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Community Development Department
2026 Fee 2025 Fee
* Minimum Charge
Fee Description and Details Deposit May be Required
ALL DEPARTMENTS - PER PAGE FEE TO MAKE COPIES $0.35 per page $0.35 $0.35 0% ALL DEPARTMENTS - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLICATION IN NEWSPAPER $305.00 per notice minimum $305.00 $305.00 0% $3,295.00 minimum $3,295.00 $3,100.00 6%
$1,050.00 and project fees * $1,050.00 $1,015.00 3%
APPEALS (IF APPLICATION IS CITY-INITIATED) $375.00 per appeal $375.00 $375.00 0% CEQA ADDENDUM TO E.I.R. FEE $15,515.00 minimum * $15,515.00 $14,180.00 9% CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION WITH NO INITIAL STUDY $55.00 minimum * $55.00 $50.00 10% $15,000 deposit plus cost to prepare the E.I.R. $15,000.00 $15,000.00 0% CEQA REVIEW - INITIAL STUDY WITH MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION $5,080.00 minimum * $5,080.00 $4,650.00 9% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 Plus Department of Fish & Wildlife Fee & County Recording Fee - At Cost ADDENDUM TO CEQA REVIEW - INITIAL STUDY WITH MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION * $2,800.00 minimum * $2,800.00 $2,660.00 5% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 Plus Department of Fish & Wildlife Fee & County Recording Fee - At Cost The costs of preparing a Mitigated Negative Declaration does not include any mitigation monitoring or site inspection relating to the proposed development project.
The costs of preparing a Mitigated Negative Declaration does not include any mitigation monitoring or site inspection relating to the proposed development project.
All other costs are reimbursed from the project application fee or deposit.
Applies to all changes or revisions to an Adopted Preliminary or Precise Development Plan.
Applies to all applications or projects that require the preparation of an Initial Study and an E.I.R. Fees to applicant will be based on time and material costs. Public Hearing Notice fee is not included and charge will be applied toward deposit.
CEQA REVIEW - INITIAL STUDY WITH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (E.I.R.)
AMENDMENT TO PRELIMINARY AND/OR PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
APPEALS (IF FEE-BASED APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND PAID) Amount is a fee, not a deposit.
67 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Community Development Department
2026 Fee 2025 Fee
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE $2,960.00 minimum per parcel * $2,960.00 $2,970.00 0% Applies to all Certificates of Compliance being requested for one parcel.
CHANGES TO A CITY COUNCIL- APPROVED PROJECT FEE $1,980.00 minimum * $1,980.00 $1,895.00 4% CHANGES TO A PLANNING COMMISSION - APPROVED PROJECT FEE $990.00 minimum * $990.00 $945.00 5% CHANGES TO A STAFF - APPROVED PROJECT FEE $495.00 minimum * $495.00 $475.00 4% CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $3,220.00 minimum * $3,220.00 $3,240.00 -1% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION FEE $1,920.00 minimum * $1,920.00 $1,905.00 1% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 DESIGN REVIEW (MAJOR) $4,185.00 minimum * $4,185.00 $4,090.00 2% DESIGN REVIEW (MINOR) $1,655.00 minimum * $1,655.00 $1,530.00 8% DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION FEE (MAJOR) $1,970.00 minimum * $1,970.00 $1,790.00 10% DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION (MINOR) $715.00 minimum * $715.00 $665.00 8% GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT $5,475.00 minimum * $5,475.00 $5,105.00 7% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 68 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Community Development Department
2026 Rate 2025 Rate
HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $110.00 each permit * $110.00 $97.00 13% LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $2,600.00 minimum * $2,600.00 $2,500.00 4% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 LOT MERGER (VOLUNTARY) $1,305.00 minimum * $1,305.00 $1,265.00 3% Applies to the Voluntary Merger of a maximum of two lots.
MINOR EXCEPTION $360.00 minimum * $360.00 $335.00 7%
MOBILE HOME RENT INCREASE APPLICATION $10,000 Deposit $10,000.00 $10,000.00 0% HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $110.00 each permit * $110.00 $97.00 13% PLOT PLAN REVIEW $605.00 minimum * $605.00 $570.00 6%
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING $1,575.00 minimum * $1,575.00 $1,095.00 44% No charge for first meeting.
PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN $5,815.00 minimum * $5,815.00 $5,815.00 0% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN $5,815.00 minimum $5,815.00 $5,815.00 0% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 PRE-SUBMITTAL PROJECT ASSISTANCE To Be Determined - Case by Case Basis PUD PERMIT $3,100.00 minimum * $3,100.00 $2,890.00 7%
REPRODUCTION ON FLASHDRIVE $5.00 Per Drive $5.00 $5.00 0% Total Fee $5.00 Per Drive
REGISTRATION FEE FOR ABANDONED AND DISTRESSED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES * $220.00 each address registered * $220.00 $195.00 13% Inspection, administration and enforcement under Chapter 8.34.040 of the Cloverdale Municipal 69 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Community Development Department
REVERSION TO ACREAGE $2,875.00 minimum * $2,875.00 $2,465.00 17% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 SIGN PERMIT - ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM $260.00 minimum * $260.00 $240.00 8% SIGN PERMIT - PLANNED PROGRAM $1,435.00 minimum * $1,435.00 $1,355.00 6% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 SPECIFIC PLAN $11,240.00 minimum * $11,240.00 $10,660.00 5% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 TENTATIVE MAP (MAJOR) $13,995.00 minimum * $13,995.00 $15,405.00 -9% Applies to all subdivisions having 5 lots or more.
Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 TENTATIVE MAP (MINOR) $3,845.00 minimum * $3,845.00 $4,025.00 -4% Applies to all subdivisions having 4 lots or less.
Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSION FEE (MAJOR) $5,900.00 minimum * $5,900.00 $6,605.00 -11% Applies to all subdivisions having 5 lots or more.
Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSION FEE (MINOR) $1,210.00 minimum * $1,210.00 $1,345.00 -10% Applies to all subdivisions having 4 lots or less.
Includes Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 TREE PERMIT $105.00 * $105.00 $25.00 320%
70 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Community Development Department
FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP $12,130.00 minimum * $12,130.00 $11,725.00 3% Applies to all subdivisions having 5 lots or more.
Plus Engineering Fee
FINAL PARCEL MAP $4,020.00 minimum * $4,020.00 $4,310.00 -7% Applies to all subdivisions having 4 lots or less.
Plus Engineering Fee
VARIANCE $3,805.00 minimum * $3,805.00 $3,495.00 9%
Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 PREZONE/ANNEXATION $8,580.00 minimum * $8,580.00 $9,395.00 -9% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 ZONING TEXT OR MAP AMENDMENT $5,000.00 minimum * $5,000.00 $7,650.00 -35% Public Hearing Notice Publication - At Cost Minimum $305.00 ZONING VERIFICATION LETTER FEE $220.00 minimum * $220.00 $195.00 13% ZONING ORDINANCE DETERMINATION BY PLANNING COMMISSION FEE $830.00 minimum * $830.00 $765.00 8% 71 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Engineering Department
* Minimum Charge 2026 2025
Fee Description and Details Deposit May be Required
ALL DEPARTMENTS - PER PAGE FEE TO MAKE COPIES (Letter, Legal & Ledger) $0.35 per page $0.35 $0.35 0% PER PAGE FEE TO MAKE COPIES (ARCH D & ARCH E) $10.00 per Page $10.00 $10.00 0% ALL DEPARTMENTS - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLICATION IN NEWSPAPER $305.00 per notice minimum $305.00 $305.00 0% Public Notice Charge from Press Democrat - At Cost
ANNEXATION MAP & DESCRIPTIONS $4,455.00 minimum * $4,455.00 $4,135.00 8% Base amount for map and description.
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Combined with Planning Fee
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION/LEGAL DESCRIPTION $930.00 minimum * $930.00 $935.00 -1% CONDOMINIUM PLATS - ASSUMES SIX (6) LOTS $3,815.00 minimum * $3,815.00 $3,500.00 9% ENCROACHMENT PERMIT $620.00 minimum * $620.00 $605.00 2% ENCROACHMENT PERMIT - ANNUAL $460.00 $460.00 $460.00 0% Additional inspections $100 each
FINAL MAP - ASSUMES SIX (6) LOTS AND LOCAL AGENCY SHEET Combined with Planning Fee INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT $5,325 minimum * $5,325.00 $4,855.00 10% LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS $3,000.00 min per description $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0% City Engineer 2.00 Hrs $334.00
City Attorney 2.00 Hrs $660.00
Principal Engineer 4.00 Hrs $889.92
Supervising Engineer 5.00 Hrs $1,150.00
Total Minimum Fee $3,033.92
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS - TWO (2) LOTS $2,310.00 minimum $2,310.00 $2,310.00 0% City Engineer 2.00 Hrs $334.00
Principal Engineer 1.00 Hrs $222.48
Supervising Engineer 8.00 Hr $1,840.00
Total Minimum Fee $2,396.48
OUTSIDE UTILITY SERVICE AGREEMENT $5,905.00 minimum $5,905.00 $5,905.00 0% City Engineer 4.00 Hrs $668.00
Accounting Assistant II 1.25 Hrs $108.75
Associate Planner 0.50 Hrs #REF!
Sr. Engineering Tech 24.00 Hrs $2,136.00
Total Minimum Fee #REF!
PARCEL MAP Included in Planning Fee
City Engineer
Principal Engineer
Supervising Engineer
Associate Planner
Total Minimum Fee $0.00
RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION $7,440.00 minimum $7,440.00 $7,440.00 0% City Engineer 4.00 Hrs $668.00
City Attorney 2.00 Hrs $660.00
Principal Engineer 4.00 Hrs $889.92
Supervising Engineer 24.00 Hrs $5,520.00
Associate Planner 2.00 Hrs #REF!
Total Minimum Fee #REF!
IMPROVEMENT PLANS $2,560.00 minimum $2,560.00 $2,560.00 0% City Engineer 4.00 Hrs $668.00
City Attorney 2.00 Hrs $660.00
Supervising Engineer 4.00 Hrs $920.00
Associate Planner 1.00 Hrs #REF!
Total Minimum Fee #REF!
72 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Engineering Department
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS $3,325.00 min per description * $3,325.00 $3,000.00 11% LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS - TWO (2) LOTS $2,690.00 minimum * $2,690.00 $2,310.00 16% OUTSIDE UTILITY SERVICE AGREEMENT $3,000.00 minimum * $3,000.00 $5,905.00 -49% PARCEL MAP Included in Planning Fee
RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION $8,545.00 minimum * $8,545.00 $7,440.00 15% IMPROVEMENT PLANS $2,945.00 minimum * $2,945.00 $2,560.00 15% 73 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Finance and Administration
2026 2025 % Increase
* Minimum Charge
Fee Description and Details Deposit May be Required
ALL DEPARTMENTS - PER PAGE FEE TO MAKE COPIES $0.35 per page $0.35 $0.35 0% ALL DEPARTMENTS - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PUBLICATION IN NEWSPAPER $305.00 per notice minimum $305.00 $305.00 0% ALL DEPARTMENTS - FINANCE CHARGE ON PAST DUE ACCOUNTS 1.5% per month on past due amount 1.5% 1.5% 0% For monthly miscellaneous accounts receivable invoices (non Utility Billing) APPEALS TO CITY COUNCIL $415.00 minimum per appeal * $415.00 $400.00 4% BUDGET COPY Paper Copy $0.35 per page $0.35 $0.35 0%
Reproduction Fee per Page $0.35
Total Minimum Fee $0.35 PER PAGE
Available free on the City's website at www.cloverdale.net BUSINESS LICENSE LISTING/LABELS $85.00 minimum plus cost of supplies * $85.00 $65.00 31% CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE STATEMENT $0.10/per page $0.10 $0.10 0% Mandated by statutes
CERTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS $145.00 / 1 hour minimum * $145.00 $140.00 4% CHECK PROCESSING - RETURNED CHECK CHARGE $50.00 * $50.00 $40.00 25% Full recovery of cost of charges from bank plus administrative time.
CHECK PROCESSING - STOP PAYMENT / RE-ISSUE Bank fee at Cost Customer responsible for fee charged by bank (presently $32)
ONLINE PAYMENT PROCESSING FEE
Business License Payment - echeck $ 1.25 1.25 1.25 0%
Business License Payment - debit/credit card 2.9% or $2.00 minimum Planning and Building - echeck $ 2.25 * 2.25 5.50 -59%
Planning and Building - debit/credit card 2.99% + $0.99 per transaction COPIES OF MINUTES $70.00 plus reproduction & mailing fees $70.00 $70.00 0% MOTION PICTURE PERMIT $1,135.00 * $1,135.00 $985.00 15% NOTICE OF VIOLATION ENFORCEMENT See Comments for Penalties
Cost is based on per page reproduction charge, or actual media cost for other media plus actual shipping and postage costs for requests to ship or mail minutes where prepaid shipping not provided. Minutes are available on line at www.cloverdale.net.
Application filing fee for permit for filming of motion pictures, commercials, et cetera, for commercial and non-commercial purposes (non-refundable), plus insurance.
The City may impose penalities pursuant to CMC §1.14.050(a) and/or Government Code §36901 and §53069.4 for a Notice of Violation(s) issued by any department. Penalties shall not exceed the amounts set forth in Government Code §36900(b), as amended from time to time.
Appeals to the City Council of a decision by the Planning Commission, staff or administrative decision. Reimbursement for full recovery of cost for Public Notice requirements plus actual staff time.
City Clerk certification of records approved by the City Council. Billed in actual time with one hour minimum.
Violations considered to be an Infraction cannot exceed $100 first violation; $200 second violation; and $500 for each subsequent violation within one year.
Violations considered to be a Misdemeanor cannot exceed $1,000 per violation. 74 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Police
* Minimum Charge
Fee Description and Details Deposit May be Required 2026 2025 CAD REPORT $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 0%
Estimated cost of CAD report reproduction. Non-refundable CHILD CAR SEAT INSTALLATION $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0%
Fee for the installation and instruction of installation of a child car seat.
CITATION SIGN-OFF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0%
Fees relates to all persons requesting a police officer to sign-off on a citation.
DISCOVERY REQUEST (Changed from 1 hr to 1.5 hrs) $120.00 * $120.00 $230.00 -48% Based on actual position wages and benefits listed through current MOU. Billed actual time only. One hour minimum. Non-refundable deposit required.
FALSE ALARMS $110.00 fourth and each subsequent * $110.00 $105.00 5% This fee applies to four or more false alarms in a calendar year. A warning letter is issued when a third false alarm occurs.
FINGERPRINTING SERVICES - CLOVERDALE RESIDENTS ONLY $55.00 * $55.00 $45.00 22% Based on current non-reimbursed County fees for processing, as well as staff time.
No charge to minors. Non-refundable.
LOCAL CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORD $40.00 * $40.00 $80.00 -50% Research, prepare and print letter, complete receipt. Non-refundable. 75 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Police
LOCAL RECORD CLEARANCE LETTER $30.00 * $30.00 $25.00 20% Research, prepare and print letter, complete receipt. Non-refundable.
LOSS VERIFICATION LETTER $30.00 * $30.00 $25.00 20%
Research, prepare and print letter, complete receipt. Non-refundable.
MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION $430.00 * $430.00 $495.00 -13% (Two-year permit - covers licensed therapist/owner)
MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT APPLICATION $430.00 * $430.00 $495.00 -13% (Two-year permit - not owner of establishment)
MEDICAL CANNABIS CULTIVATION PERMIT APPLICATION $430.00 * $430.00 $495.00 -13% PHOTOS (POLICE RECORDS) $40.00 minimum $40.00 $40.00 0% .
POLICE REPORT $40.00 minimum $40.00 $40.00 0%
Estimated cost of police report reproduction. Includes first 10 pages. Each additional page $.35. Non-refundable.
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PERMIT (CERTIFICATE OF NECESSITY) - CLOVERDALE RESIDENTS ONLY $295.00 * $295.00 $410.00 -28% Includes printed Certificate of Necessity. Non-refundable.
SPEED SURVEY - PER SURVEY $40.00 per survey $40.00 $40.00 0% Fee is based on administrative time and copying one survey. Non-refundable.
TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORT $30.00 per copy * $30.00 $25.00 20% VEHICLE STORAGE / IMPOUND RELEASE $95.00 per release * $95.00 $75.00 27% Per Vehicle Code Section 22850.5. Paperwork is processed at the time vehicle is towed. Information entered by dispatch. Copies mailed to registered owner.
VEHICLE REPOSSESSION RELEASE $30.00 per release * $30.00 $25.00 20% Fee is specified by California Vehicle Repo statute.
Based on non-reimbursed fees for processing, as well as staff time. Non-refundable Estimated cost of developing/printing photos. Non-refundable deposit required.
Based on current non-reimbursed fees for processing, as well as staff time. Non-refundable.
Based on current non-reimbursed fees for processing, as well as staff time. Non-refundable. 76 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Utility Departments
Fee Description and Details 2024 Fee 2024 Fee
SEWER DEPARTMENT - MONTHLY RATE SCHEDULE As Adopted by
Resolution 55-2021 hereby shown for informational purposes Effective Date Residential Flat Rates - Monthly Charge July 2025 July 2025 July 2024 Single Family Residential (Per dwelling unit) $ 62.77 * $ 62.77 $ 57.06 10% Multi Family Residential (Per dwelling unit) $ 42.05 * $ 42.05 $ 38.23 10% Non-Residential Base Charges - Monthly Charge
Up to 1" meter $ 17.46 * $ 17.46 $ 15.87 10%
1 1/2" meter $ 31.53 * $ 31.53 $ 28.66 10%
2" meter $ 48.40 * $ 48.40 $ 44.00 10%
3" Meter $ 93.38 * $ 93.38 $ 84.89 10%
4" Meter $ 143.97 * $ 143.97 $ 130.88 10%
Non-Residential Usage Charges per Unit (748 gallons)
Low Strength $ 6.96 * $ 6.96 $ 6.33 10%
Medium Strength $ 8.70 * $ 8.70 $ 7.91 10%
High Strength $ 12.69 * $ 12.69 $ 11.54 10%
Public Schools (monthly)
Per 100 Average daily attendance (student count) $ 257.37 * $ 257.37 $ 233.97 10% SEWER DEPARTMENT - SEWER USE PERMIT FEE - NON-RESIDENTIAL DISCHARGES $105 Annual Fee * 105 210 -50% WATER DEPARTMENT - MONTHLY RATE SCHEDULE As Adopted by
Resolution 54-2021 hereby shown for informational purposes Effective Date Base Charges July 2025 July 2025 July 2024
Up to 1" Meter $ 40.78 * $ 40.78 $ 36.41 12%
1 1/2" Meter $ 77.04 * $ 77.04 $ 68.79 12%
2" Meter $ 120.56 * $ 120.56 $ 107.64 12%
3" Meter $ 236.59 * $ 236.59 $ 211.24 12%
4" Meter $ 367.14 * $ 367.14 $ 327.80 12%
6" Meter $ 729.75 * $ 729.75 $ 651.56 12%
Water Usage Charge $ 7.96 * $ 7.96 $ 7.11 12%
(Billed in units of 100 cubic feet - 748 gallons per unit) WATER DEPARTMENT - LEAK TEST $45.00 each test after the first test 45 45 0% WATER DEPARTMENT - WATER METER TEST $90.00 per hour (one hour minimum) 90 90 0% Fee applies to customer requesting test of meter, If meter working properly, customer will be billed. .
WATER DEPARTMENT - METER TAMPERING $725.00 minimum * 725 720 1% CMC 13.04.540 … subject to the imposition of a charge of not more than five hundred dollars plus any costs required for any damage to city property. (Ord. 477-93 (part), 1994)
77 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Utility Departments
WATER DEPARTMENT - CUT LOCK $725.00 minimum * 725 710 2% $75.00 * 75 65 15%
$150.00 * 150 135 11%
Monday - Thursday 8:00a.m. - 3:00p.m. Connect Service Fee included.
Holidays billed at "After Hours" rate.
$270.00 270 270 0%
After 3:00pm weekdays, weekend and/or holidays - Connect Service Fee of $60.00 not included. Plus $60.00 WATER DEPARTMENT - AFTER HOURS DISCONNECT SERVICE FEE $270.00 270 270 0% After 3:00pm weekdays, weekend and/or holidays
WATER DEPARTMENT - DOOR HANGER DELIVERED $45.00 * 45 35 29% 48-hour notice of pending termination for non-payment
WATER DEPARTMENT - NON-PAYMENT DISCONNECT / RECONNECT SERVICE FEE $155.00 * 155 135 15% $150.00 150 150 0%
If enrolled in auto debit payment program, deposit is half $75.00 75 75 0% WATER DEPARTMENT - WATER METER HYDRANT HOOK-UP DEPOSIT $1,000.00 1000 1000 0% Per CMC 13.04.060 deposit required on new service accounts or waived per municipal code WATER DEPARTMENT - AFTER HOURS CONNECT SERVICE FEES and/or holidays Fee applied to: 1) application for new service, or 2) when a customer requests re-connection for their own convenience.
Account holder to pay fee when customer requests disconnection for their own convenience.
Account holder charged a fee when a door hanger is delivered to notify account holder that their water account is in arrears and termination is pending.
Account holder charged when water service is disconnected then reconnected due to non-payment of outstanding charges WATER DEPARTMENT - NEW ACCOUNT DEPOSIT - per dwelling unit CMC 13.04.540 … subject to the imposition of a charge of not more than five hundred dollars plus any costs required for any damage to city property. (Ord. 477-93 (part), 1994) ($500 violation, price of replacement lock, and staff time) WATER DEPARTMENT - CONNECT SERVICE FEE - Monday - Thursday between 8:00a.m. - 3:00p.m. (excluding holidays) Fee applied to: 1) application for new service or, 2) when a customer requests re-connection for their own convenience.
WATER DEPARTMENT - SAME DAY SERVICE FEE - PER CONNECT OR DISCONNECT Fee applied to: 1) application for new service, 2) application to stop service, or 3) when a customer requests re-connection for their own convenience 78 City of Cloverdale
2025-26 Master Fee Schedule
Exhibit A - Public Works Department
2026 2025 % Increase
* Minimum Charge
Fee Description and Details Deposit May be Required
AIRPORT HANGER RENTAL
Tie Down $48.00 per month 48.00 48.00 0%
Ground Lease $72.00 per month 72.00 72.00 0%
City Hangars $202.00 per month 202.00 202.00 0%
Medium Corporate Hangar & Ground (Contract) $1,715.00 per month 1,715.00 1,715.00 0% Large Corporate Hangar $802.50 per month 802.50 802.50 0% Capital Improvement Fee $50 per month 50.00 50.00 0%
ATHLETIC FIELD PREPARATION FEE - SPECIAL REQUEST $280.00 min plus equipment * $280.00 $260.00 8% Monday - Friday 8:00a.m. - 3:00p.m.
ATHLETIC FIELD PREPARATION FEE - SPECIAL REQUEST $280.00 min plus equipment * $280.00 $260.00 8% After hours, weekend and/or holidays
ATHLETIC LEAGUE FEE See Below
Resolution 23-2002, adopted March 27, 2002, set fees at $250 based upon execution of MOU between leagues and City. Leagues not participating will pay $785-$1085. Subject to change when new resolution is adopted.
Athletic Leagues with MOU with City $0.00
Non-participating Athletic Leagues $785.00 - $1,085.00
ATHLETIC TOURNAMENTS PER DAY - Monday - Friday 8:00a.m. - 3:00p.m. $180.00 min * $180.00 $215.00 -16% ATHLETIC TOURNAMENTS PER DAY - After hours, on weekend and/or holidays $180.00 min * $180.00 $215.00 -16% BACKFLOW CERTIFICATION + PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION FEE $145.00 min * $145.00 $150.00 -3% BANNER INSTALLATION OR REMOVAL $180.00 min * $180.00 $215.00 -16% Available Monday - Friday 8:00a.m. - 3:00p.m. only
CEMETERY BURIAL FEE - CASKET $1,945.00 min plus materials and equipment * $1,945.00 $2,280.00 -15% Based on ten hour minimum, two persons, plus equipment and administration.
CEMETERY BURIAL FEE - CREMATION $615.00 min plus materials and equipment * $615.00 $680.00 -10% Based on four hour minimum plus equipment and administration.
SERVICE RESPONSE FEE - AFTER HOURS, WEEKENDS AND/OR HOLIDAYS $270.00 minimum * $270.00 $320.00 -16% Based on three hour minimum plus cost of equipment. plus materials and equipment SERVICE RESPONSE FEE - MONDAY THRU FRIDAY 07:00AM TO 04:00PM $90.00 minimum * $90.00 $105.00 -14% Based on one hour minimum, overtime rate, plus cost of equipment. plus materials and equipment STREET SWEEPER SPECIAL REQUEST $270.00 minimum * $270.00 $320.00 -16% AFTER HOURS, WEEKENDS AND/OR HOLIDAYS (OT rate)
Based on three hour minimum plus cost of equipment.
STREET SWEEPER SPECIAL REQUEST - MONDAY THRU FRIDAY 8:00AM TO 3:00PM $270.00 minimum * $270.00 $320.00 -16% Based on one hour minimum, overtime rate, plus cost of equipment. plus materials and equipment plus materials and equipment
Based on two hour minimum.
Based on two hour minimum.
Cost is per installation of banner or removal of banner.
Based on two and a half hour minimum plus cost of equipment. 79 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT MAJOR (PARKS AND CITY PLAZA RESERVATIONS)\ Based on three hour minimum plus cost of equipment. Overtime costs are incurred if work is required after hours, on weekends and/or holidays. Certificate of Additional Insured is required prior to use or must be purchased through the City of Cloverdale at cost. NOTE: This fee is per event not to exceed a two-day period.
Additional fees may include barricades, Planning/Engineering permit fees, street closure fees, city staff presence, et cetera, which can be reviewed on the Special Event Permit Application. Fee includes a non-refundable application fee of $75.00 per event. Non-profit 501(c)(3) organizations are eligible for reduced permit fees when the event benefits the Cloverdale community and these applications are considered on a case-by-case basis. 2026 2025
1 - 25 Persons (including attendees) $420.00 min plus materials and equipment * $ 420.00 $ 485.00 -13% 26 - 75 Persons (including attendees) $535.00 min plus materials and equipment * $ 535.00 $ 590.00 -9% 76 - 199 Persons (including attendees) $650.00 min plus materials and equipment * $ 650.00 $ 695.00 -6% 200+ Persons (including attendees and event personnel) 945.00 min plus materials and equipment * $ 945.00 $ 1,195.00 -21% 80 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF CLOVERDALE CITY COUNCIL
Notice Is Hereby Given, that the City of Cloverdale City Council will hold a public hearing, pursuant to Government Code §66016, on Wednesday, July 23 , 2025, at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter at the Cloverdale Performing Arts Center, 209 N Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, CA, to take public input regarding the proposed service fee updates for the City of Cloverdale.
At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, staff will be recommending the Council adopt resolutions approving the Updated Fee Schedule.
Meeting agenda and agenda reports are available for review on the city’s website: www.cloverdale.net or at the City of Cloverdale Finance Department, 124 N. Cloverdale Blvd., Cloverdale, California. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (707) 894-1712. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will assist City staff in assuring those reasonable accommodations are made to provide accessibility to the meeting. Meeting Attendance and participation is welcome in person or by using Zoom (meeting ID and password to be posted on City website www.cloverdale.net prior to the meeting).
All interested persons are invited to send written comments to the Finance Department Finance Director Susie Holmes by email at [email protected]. ca.us no later than the hearing date and/or be present to comment orally on the project. If you challenge this item in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
81 City Council/Successor Agency
Agenda Item Summary Agenda Item: G.2
Meeting Date: July 23, 2025
Agenda Section:
Public Hearing
Staff Contact:
Kevin Thompson, City Manager
Agenda Item Title:
Consider Adoption of a Resolution adopting a subsequent environmental impact report (SEIR) and mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) in connection with the Circulation Element and approving a General Plan Amendment to update the Circulation Element of the General Plan. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Recommended Council Action(s):
Adopt resolution entitled, “A resolution of the City of Cloverdale city council adopting a subsequent environmental impact report (EIR) and mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) in connection with the Circulation Element and approving a General Plan Amendment to update the Circulation Element of the General Plan.”
_______________________________________________________________________________________ Background/Background:
The Circulation Element is one of the seven mandated elements of the General Plan, which was last updated in 2009. The City proposes to update the Circulation Element of the General Plan to address new legislation including Senate Bill (SB) 743 and the transition of CEQA transportation analysis from congestion-based metrics, such as LOS (level of service) to the State-mandated metric of VMT (vehicle miles traveled).
Project environmental review included a subsequent EIR to the City’s General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which was certified in 2009 when the General Plan was adopted.
The Planning Commission recommended the City Council adopt the Circulation Element at a duly noticed public hearing held on April 1, 2025. At this time, the City Council is being asked to review and adopt the Circulation Element and attached subsequent EIR and mitigation monitoring and reporting program.
The Circulation Element Update process consists of the following steps:
• Reviewing existing transportation conditions and policies; • Developing updated transportation goals, policies, and programs; • Preparing the City’s planned transportation network maps; • Developing strategies to manage transportation demand and congestion; • Updating the City’s transportation study guidelines;
• Preparing draft and final Circulation Element updates; • Conducting public outreach;
• Analyzing potential environmental impacts pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The Circulation Element Update supports a multimodal transportation system that serves the mobility needs of all residents and manages traffic congestion as the City grows and changes. The goals, policies, and implementation actions would support the City’s compliance with the State-mandated requirements to implement Complete Streets and make efforts to reduce VMT in the community. 82 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: July 23, 2025
Policies in the proposed Circulation Element Update would continue the City’s commitment to a Complete Streets strategy to provide residents, employees, and visitors with a range of options for travel by supporting existing and planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities and addressing transit services within the City and region. Additionally, the proposed Circulation Element Update identifies the roadway system necessary for automobile traffic by setting LOS goals, VMT goals, a hierarchy of roads, and areas where road improvements are necessary.
Furthermore, since the last General Plan update, California has changed the way that environmental impacts associated with the circulation system are defined and analyzed under CEQA. As described above, the current Circulation Element uses LOS as an environmental threshold and measure of circulation system performance.
On July 1, 2020, SB 743 became effective. Implementing SB 743, the City’s environmental thresholds recognize that VMT is generally the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. VMT is a measure of the amount of travel for all vehicles in a geographic region. Accordingly, the proposed Circulation Element Update would change the focus of the Circulation Element from widening roadways and intersections to reducing the total vehicle travel within the community. The proposed goals, policies, and programs can be reviewed in Exhibit A.
State law does permit the City to use LOS standards and policies when evaluating development projects and planning required transportation improvements to such development; therefore, the proposed Circulation Element Update includes goals and policies that support congestion relief (LOS), as well as reduction of total VMT.
CEQA
A Subsequent Environmental Impact report (EIR) was prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and evaluates the environmental impacts of implementing the Project and three alternatives. The Subsequent EIR concludes that the proposed Circulation Element Update would have less than significant cumulative impacts related to Transportation and Traffic, with the exception of project-level and cumulative VMT impacts. However, the proposed Circulation Element Update would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to VMT, both at the project level and cumulatively.
The Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific site development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. Accordingly, no impacts were found related to Aesthetics, Agricultural and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services and Utilities, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire. Therefore, these aforementioned topical areas would have no cumulative impacts.
Options:
1. Reject the Resolution; or
2. Provide alternative direction to City staff.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Subcommittee Recommendation:
Bring forward for full Council consideration
_______________________________________________________________________________________ 83 City Council/Successor Agency Agenda Item Summary
Meeting Date: July 23, 2025
Budget/Financial Impact:
Majority of project paid for using grant funding.
________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachments
1. Resolution
a. Exhibit A: Circulation Element and Cross Sections
b. Exhibit B: Subsequent EIR and Exhibits
c. Exhibit C: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 84 CITY OF CLOVERDALE
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLOVERDALE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A SUBSEQUENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM (MMRP) IN CONNECTION WITH THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT AND APPROVE A GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT TO UPDATE THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65350, et. seq., mandates that each City and County shall prepare, adopt and amend General Plans and elements of those Plans; and WHEREAS, an updated Circulation Element must be adopted to comply with new State laws, including Senate Bill (SB) 743 and transition of CEQA transportation impact analysis from congestion-based metrics, such as LOS (level of service) to the State-mandated metric of VMT (vehicle miles traveled). The update must also be adopted to comply with AB 98 (Statewide Standards for Logistics Use Warehouses); and WHEREAS, the City of Cloverdale General Plan Circulation Element identifies the guiding principles for moving people and goods within the City and identifies the infrastructure necessary to assure that the transportation network will serve the City at General Plan buildout. Furthermore, the goals, policies, and implementation actions will support the City’s compliance with the State-mandated requirements to implement Complete Streets and make efforts to reduce VMT in the community; and WHEREAS, the City of Cloverdale has prepared the Circulation Element Update (“Circulation Element”) in compliance with State law, and is attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution by reference; and WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Sections 65352 – 65352.5, the City of Cloverdale referred the Circulation Element Update to all California Native American tribes on the contact list provided by the Native American Heritage Commission and to other entities listed and no tribes requested consultation; and
WHEREAS, Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines provides direction as to the circumstances in which a subsequent EIR shall be prepared including when, based on substantial evidence in light of the whole record, the lead agency determines that substantial changes are proposed in the project or program described and addressed in a prior EIR, or change in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken, that together would involve new significant environmental effects or more severe significant effects than previously identified, such that major revisions of the prior EIR are required; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the Draft Subsequent EIR for the General Plan Circulation Element Update was circulated from January 31, 2024, to March 1, 2024, to commenting agencies, the State Clearinghouse (SCH) and general public. A scoping meeting was held on February 13, 2024, and attended by one member of the public; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) a Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) to the 2009 General Plan EIR was completed (Exhibit B). The DSEIR evaluates the environmental impacts of implementing the Project and three alternatives. The DSEIR concludes that the Circulation Element Update will have less than significant cumulative impacts related to Transportation and Traffic, with the exception of project-level and cumulative VMT impacts. However, the Circulation Element Update will result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to VMT, both at the project level and cumulatively; and
85 WHEREAS, a Notice of Availability (NOA) of the DSEIR was prepared on September 13, 2024, and copies of the DSEIR were provided to the state Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse (SCH) for distribution to state Responsible Agencies, and was also made available on the City’s public website to solicit comment on the DSEIR during a 45-day comment period ending on October 28, 2024, at 5:00 p.m., and the DSEIR was made available at Cloverdale City Hall at 124 N. Cloverdale Boulevard, Cloverdale, California, 95425 on September 13, 2024; and
WHEREAS, on April 1, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly and properly noticed public hearing, reviewed the Circulation Element and all pertinent maps, documents and exhibits, the staff report and all attachments, and oral and written public comments; recommended adoption of the Subsequent EIR (Exhibit B) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) (Exhibit C) and determined the Circulation Element to be consistent with State law and the General Plan of the City of Cloverdale.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the above recitations are true and correct and are incorporated by reference into this action.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby makes the following findings:
a. The Circulation Element Update is internally consistent with the Cloverdale General Plan. b. Pursuant to CEQA guidelines a Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) to the 2009 General Plan EIR was completed and to evaluate the environmental impacts of implementing the updated Circulation Element and three alternatives. The DSEIR concludes that the Circulation Element will have less than significant cumulative impacts related to Transportation and Traffic, with the exception of projectlevel and cumulative VMT impacts. However, the Circulation Element Update will result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to VMT, both at the project level and cumulatively. c. The site (citywide) is physically suitable (including absence of physical constraints, access, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and provision of utilities) for the requested/anticipated land use developments.
d. Notice of the Council’s hearing on the Subsequent EIR was given as required by law and the actions were conducted pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law, CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. e. All individuals, groups and agencies desiring to comment were given adequate opportunity to submit oral and written comments on the Draft Subsequent EIR which met or exceeded the requirements of State Planning and Zoning Law and CEQA.
f. The Circulation Element complies with new State laws, including Senate Bill (SB) 743 and transition of CEQA transportation impact analysis from congestion-based metrics, such as LOS (level of service) to the State-mandated metric of VMT (vehicle miles traveled). The update is also in compliance with AB 98 (Statewide Standards for Logistics Use Warehouses).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cloverdale hereby rescinds the current Circulation Element and adopts the updated Circulation Element of the General Plan (Exhibit A).
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cloverdale held on the 23rd day of July 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: ()
NOES: ()
ABSTAIN: ()
ABSENT: ()
APPROVED: ATTEST:
_______________________ _____________________
Todd Lands, Mayor Mike Maloney, City Clerk
86 Exhibits:
Exhibit A: Circulation Element and Cross Sections
Exhibit B: Subsequent EIR and Exhibits
Exhibit C: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
87 3.0 CIRCULATION
3.0 CIRCULATION ELEMENT
88 Cloverdale
River Park
Cloverdale
Airport
SMART Station/
Cloverdale Depot
Russian River
N Cloverdale Rd
N Redwood Hwy
S Cloverdale Rd
Foothill Blvd
Citrus Fair Dr
Asti Rd
Dutcher Creek Rd
Asti Rd
Santana Dr
Kelly Rd
Kelly Rd
E 1st St
Crocker Rd
River Ln
River Rd
Geysers Rd
River Rd
CLOVERDALE
128 101
101
WC23-4035_3.1_RoadClass
Street Classifications
Exhibit 3.1
City Limits MTC Priority Development Area:
Downtown/SMART Transit Area
Railroad
Street Classication: Freeway Highway Arterial Collector 89 Cloverdale
River Park
Cloverdale
Airport
Russian River
SMART Station/
Cloverdale Depot
N Cloverdale Rd
N Redwood Hwy
S Cloverdale Rd
Foothill Blvd
Citrus Fair Dr
Asti Rd
Dutcher Creek Rd
Asti Rd
Santana Dr
Kelly Rd
Kelly Rd
E 1st St
Crocker Rd
River Ln
River Rd
Geysers Rd
River Rd
CLOVERDALE
128 101
101
WC23-4035_3.2_BikeFac
Existing and Proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Exhibit 3.2
City Limits
Source: Sonoma County Active Transportation Plan.
Class I Multi-Use Path
Existing Proposed
Class II Bicycle Lane
Class III Bicycle Route
MTC Priority Development Area:
Downtown/SMART Transit Area
Note: Prior to implementation, roadway segment and proposed crossing designations may be altered depending on opportunities, constraints, and/ or roadway changes as determined by the City. 90 Cloverdale
River Park
Cloverdale
Airport
Russian River
SMART Station/
Cloverdale Depot
N Cloverdale Rd
N Redwood Hwy
S Cloverdale Rd
Foothill Blvd
Citrus Fair Dr
Asti Rd
Dutcher Creek Rd
Asti Rd
Santana Dr
Kelly Rd
Kelly Rd
E 1st St
Crocker Rd
River Ln
River Rd
Geysers Rd
River Rd
CLOVERDALE
128 101
101
68 68
WC23-4035_3.3_Transit
Existing Transit System
Exhibit 3.3
City Limits Sonoma County Transit 60
Sonoma County Transit 68
MTC Priority Development Area: Amtrak Thruway Bus Stop
Downtown/SMART Transit Area
91 3.0 CIRCULATION
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The Circulation Element identifies the guiding principles for moving people and goods within the city and identifies the infrastructure necessary to assure that the transportation network will serve the City at General Plan buildout. The Circulation Element provides the goals, policies, and implementation actions that will support the City’s compliance with the State-mandated requirements to implement complete streets and make efforts to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the community.
The Circulation Element proposes several policies to support these additional important roadway functions, rather than serving the single purpose of automobile traffic. The Circulation Element addresses the City’s existing and planned bike and pedestrian circulation, including dedicated bicycle and pedestrian paths. These active transportation networks facilitate access to sites throughout the city, allowing for greater choice in transportation modes. Alternative transportation is important to reduce pressure on roads, conserve energy, and improve the public health through exercise. The Element addresses transit services and the interconnection between the City’s local multi-modal network and regional transit and passenger rail services. Policies in the Circulation Element will continue the City’s commitment to a complete streets strategy to provide residents, employees, and visitors with a range of options for travel to work, shopping, and leisure destinations.
The Circulation Element supports a multi-modal transportation system that serves the mobility needs of all residents and manages auto traffic congestion as the city grows and changes. The California Complete Streets Act of 2008 (Assembly Bill 1358) defines complete streets as roadways that are planned, designed, constructed, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users regardless of age and physical ability, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and public transportation riders as appropriate to the function and context of the facility. To ensure that people are willing to travel by means other than the automobile, it is critical to support and facilitate a safe and comfortable multimodal transportation network for all users. Besides improving access and mobility options, complete streets policies provide public health benefits. Transportation infrastructure that promotes everyday physical activity such as walking and biking, sometimes referred to as “active transportation,” addresses sedentary behavior, which is a shared risk factor for obesity and other chronic diseases.
A majority of trips within the city are currently made by automobile. The Circulation Element identifies the roadway system necessary for automobile traffic by setting level of service goals, hierarchy of roads, and areas where road improvements are necessary.
The road system provides many functions in addition to carrying vehicle traffic. It provides open space separating dwelling units and commercial uses. If landscaped, streetside landscaping provides a location for trees to support the urban forest. If developed with safe pedestrian and bike ways, it serves as a non-motorized transportation corridor, a linear park, and an attractive network for healthy exercise. Mindfully designed, it provides the background for the community urban design and appearance. Finally, it provides the right of way for most of the City’s public utilities infrastructure.
The US 101/State Route 128 freeway separates the developed areas of Cloverdale from the SMART passenger rail station. The freeway also blocks pedestrian and bicycle access to 92 3.0 CIRCULATION
the station. A substantial commitment to encourage development near the station and other ways to expand passenger rail use will be necessary to bring more frequent transit headways (number of trips) to Cloverdale.
Finally, the Circulation Element also acknowledges that goods movement is critical to keep businesses and cities functioning. Strategies to improve goods movement efficiency also offer potential solutions for improving safety, managing roadway congestion, and reducing the impacts of associated nuisances on sensitive populations. Policies in this section encourage strategic placement of truck routes and freight schedules to minimize negative impacts to the community.
Since the last general plan update, California has changed the way that environmental impacts associated with the circulation system are defined and analyzed under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The traditional measure of circulation system performance has been Level of Service (LOS). LOS rates roadway traffic flow characteristics from Level A (free flowing traffic) to Level F (gridlock) and serves as an indicator of the performance of the circulation system. Poor LOS (typically Levels D, E and F) has historically been defined as an environmental impact requiring mitigation. On July 1, 2020, Senate Bill 743 became effective and now requires that vehicle miles traveled (VMT) replace LOS as the basis for determining environmental impacts and the need for mitigation. VMT is a measure of the amount of travel for all vehicles in a geographic region. As part of development and transportation infrastructure projects CEQA review requires new development projects to achieve a reduction in vehicle miles of travel per capita or VMT per service population compared to baseline VMT performance conditions and General Plan VMT performance conditions. While the focus of the Circulation Element has changed from widening roadways and intersections to reducing the total vehicle travel within a community, State law permits the City to use LOS standards and policies when evaluating development projects and planning transportation improvements.
As such, this Circulation Element includes goals and policies that support both congestion relief and reduction of total vehicle miles traveled.
3.2 GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS
Goal CE 1
Develop and maintain a balanced vehicular and multi-modal transportation system to meet the mobility needs consistent with General Plan land use goals and policies and aligns with California’s SB 743 environmental requirements defined and analyzed under the California Environmental Quality Act. Provide a balance of land uses within the General Plan Study Area for housing, jobs, economic development, recreation, and destination commercial uses.
Policy CE 1-1
Develop and maintain the Circulation Plan network of freeway/highways, arterials, collectors, and local streets. The proposed streets should be designed to serve the functions they are intended to serve, with adequate capacity and safety and address complete streets.
93 3.0 CIRCULATION
Implementation CE 1-1.a. Design, construct, upgrade, and maintain the automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation system according to the functions they are intended to serve, as shown in Exhibit 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and the trails systems in Exhibit 5.1 (Parks and Recreation Element). Ensure active transportation connections among neighborhoods.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: Capital Improvement Program, project approvals, development impact fees.
Implementation CE 1-1.b. Update design to align with new standards and maintain the existing circulation network through the Capital Improvement Program and Development Impact Fees. The City shall strive to maximize the efficiency of the roadway system within the existing roadway widths, prioritizing strategies such as investing and maintaining advanced traffic signal synchronization systems over roadway widening projects.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: Capital Improvement Program, project approvals, street improvement fund
Implementation CE 1-1.c. Coordinate with the County of Sonoma and Caltrans in addressing regional transportation issues.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: Countywide Transportation Development Act Funding.
Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA)
Measure M/Go Sonoma, SMART Passenger Rail
Authority
Implementation CE 1-1.d. Provide funding to repair streets and bicycle facilities that are deteriorated and sidewalks that are in poor repair.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: Capital Improvement Program, project approvals, street improvement fund
Implementation CE 1-1.e. Regularly review and establish designated truck routes in the City to minimize noise impacts on residential areas. Construction truck routes shall be specified to minimize noise impacts. Coordinate with local businesses to identify preferred truck routes to access key destinations in the City. (See Policy CE 8-1).
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: Capital Improvement Program, project approvals, street improvement fund
94 3.0 CIRCULATION
Policy CE 1-2
Plan and reserve in advance of development, the street alignments, right-of-way and building setbacks necessary to handle anticipated future growth, traffic and bicycle and pedestrian requirements.
Implementation CE 1-2.a. Develop and adopt plan lines, if needed, for arterial and collector streets shown in Exhibit 3.1 and Exhibit 3.4. Place plan lines in the Zoning Ordinance and require setbacks to be measured from adopted plan lines.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: General Fund
Implementation CE 1-2.b. Require new development and expansions of existing development to provide necessary street improvements for the demand of all transportation modes.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: General Fund
Implementation CE 1-2.c. Develop and maintain an up-to-date comprehensive street improvement fee for new development to finance General Plan roadway improvements necessary to serve the City at General Plan buildout.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: General Fund
Policy CE 1-3
Design street systems in residential areas to minimize through traffic, to encourage internal movement by bicycling and walking, to provide connected safer and quieter neighborhoods, to minimize vehicular conflicts at intersections and to ensure that the impact of recreational traffic on local residents is minimized. (See Policy CE 8-1).
Implementation CE 1-3.a. Identify and provide directional signs to active transportation and recreational uses that maximize use of arterial and collector streets and minimize or eliminate traffic through residential areas.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: General Fund
Policy CE 1-4
Increase Electric Vehicle (EV) Adoption and Infrastructure.
Implementation CE 1-4.a. Develop an EV Readiness Plan that is consistent with Sonoma County EV planning. This plan should establish a path forward to increase EV infrastructure within the city, promote equitable mode shift to EVs, and identify funding for implementation of public charging infrastructure in key locations.
95 3.0 CIRCULATION
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: General Fund
Implementation CE 1-4.b. The City shall encourage commercial areas and new multifamily developments to provide dedicated parking for electric vehicles.
Create incentives for electric vehicle adoption by providing EV parking only spots in high-traffic convenience locations and public parking EV chargers. Develop a parking space ratio requirement for new and redeveloped commercial, multifamily, residential subdivision, and condominium projects to have a specified amount of EV only parking with chargers.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: General Fund
Implementation CE 1-4.c. The City shall require new non-residential development projects to include the installation of electric vehicle charging stations consistent with the State of California Green Building Code (CALGreen).
The charging stations should be sited to provide prioritized access to building entrances.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: General Fund
Implementation CE 1-4.d. The City shall require new residential development projects to be “electric vehicle charging ready,” including the installation of higher-voltage electric systems to serve for the Level 2 charging of electric vehicles consistent with the California Green Building Code.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: General Fund
Implementation CE 1-4.e. The City shall transition the City municipal vehicle fleet to alternative-fuel vehicles provided that the alternative fuel vehicle can meet the performance standards required for its use. (See Policy CDO 8-1).
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Timeframe: Solar power source studies within one year. Other implementation measures as opportunities present.
Resources: General Fund and Community Development Agency.
Goal CE 2
Maintain a satisfactory Level of Service for automobile traffic for efficient operational flow not required by CEQA analysis.
Policy CE 2-1
The City shall strive to achieve Level of Service (LOS) D operation as the planned operating condition at intersections, except for intersections that are operating at LOS 96 3.0 CIRCULATION
E or lower at the time an application for a proposed development project or a specific plan is submitted if no feasible improvements exist to improve the LOS. For public safety, signalization warrants shall be evaluated using MUTCD standards. For projected future conditions the LOS is to be calculated using the average traffic demand over the highest 60-minute period. For all types of control the Level of Service standard is to be applied to the average intersection delay, and not for any single movement or approach. Exceptions to meeting this standard include:
• Stop-controlled minor street approaches to either collector or arterial streets; Locations where the City Engineer deems improvement to be technically, financially, or environmentally infeasible;
Locations where improvements are needed to meet LOS standards but are not warranted based on volumes;
• Conditions where no feasible improvements exist in order to support safe bike, pedestrian, or transit access to downtown area or the SMART station; or • Locations where attainment would cause loss of the unique character of the downtown, identified historic resources or neighborhood character, distinctive tree canopy, or distinctive watercourses.
Implementation CE 2.1.a. The City shall require proposed development projects that could result in increased traffic to include improvements that assure LOS levels do not fall below the established minimum standard. The developer shall analyze the operational benefits of large-scale, automobile capacity-focused improvements to assure that they are balanced against the induced vehicle- miles of travel (VMT) resulting from the improvements. The City shall ensure that improvements are coordinated with roadway improvements programmed for funding through transportation-related impact fees.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Departments Timeframe: Ongoing. Require traffic reports with major development proposals.
Resources: General Fund
Implementation CE 2.1.b. Signalize or convert to roundabout control the Healdsburg Avenue and Cloverdale Boulevard Intersection.
Responsibility: City Engineer
Timeframe: With adjoining development and when signal warrants are met
Resources: Developer fees and street funds.
Implementation CE 2.1.c. Evaluate roundabout or traffic signal configurations and pedestrian and bicycle facilities at the Citrus Fair Drive interchange to promote multimodal safety and accommodate traffic levels related to the overcrossing, offramps, and Asti Road and South Cloverdale Boulevard to 97 3.0 CIRCULATION
achieve LOS D. Alternative designs may be considered if pedestrian and bicycle facilities and LOS D can be achieved by those designs.
Responsibility: City Engineer
Timeframe: With adjoining development and when signal warrants are met
Resources: Developer fees and street funds.
Implementation CE 2.1.d. Identify and evaluate potential locations for roundabouts to promote multimodal safety and operations.
Responsibility: City Engineer
Timeframe: With adjoining development and when signal warrants are met
Resources: Developer fees and street funds.
Policy CE 2-2
Create a “country road” appearance for Cloverdale Boulevard, First Street east of the freeway, and Asti Road where possible, including narrow pavement, shade trees adjoining travel lanes, parking only where necessary, and protected bicycle and pedestrian ways.
Implementation CE 2-2.a. Prepare design plans for Cloverdale Boulevard, First Street east of the freeway, and Asti Road prior to major improvements to those roads.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Prior to major improvements
Resources: General Fund, street funds, developer contributions.
Goal CE 3
Promote and support an integrated network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, as shown in Exhibit 3.2, that allows safe and convenient travel for all users as an alternative to automobile traffic and for community health and enjoyment. Design all streets as complete streets, including arterial and collector roadways, which integrate walking, biking, transit use, and green infrastructure, and natural features (such as creeks and greenways).
Policy CE 3-1
Ensure that streets safety serve all users and provide a network connecting residences, employment areas, services, health care, schools, parks, retail area and public facilities.
Implementation CE 3-1.a. Implement programs for bicycle and pedestrian trails in the Parks and Recreation Element.
Implementation CE 3-1.b. Maintain an up-to-date bikeways plan in conjunction with the Sonoma County Transportation Agency Countywide bikeways plan.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: General Fund
98 3.0 CIRCULATION
Implementation CE 3-1.c. Integrate bicycle and pedestrian routes with transit stops.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: Include integration with public works projects and planning permit approvals.
Policy CE 3-2
Provide continuous sidewalks or pedestrian paths along all streets. Maintain sidewalks in good repair. Integrate sidewalks and the pedestrian trails network in the Recreation and Open Space Element.
Implementation CE 3-2.a. Explore a program to fund sidewalk improvement or installation where no sidewalks exist, including sharing of costs with property owners, loans payable at time of sale, etc.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: General Fund. Sidewalk improvement funds.
Implementation CE 3-2.b. Identify major pedestrian routes and, where they adjoin streets, prepare roadway sections that encourage pedestrian use. including intersection crossings mid-block pedestrian crossings and upgrading pedestrian facilities to current ADA requirements
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Prior to major street improvements
Resources: General Fund. Repair and install with public works projects and planning permit approvals.
Implementation CE 3-2.c. Repair or install sidewalks or pedestrian paths on all streets in conjunction with public works and private development projects. Where roadway modifications are proposed and the City owns an existing right-of-way that exceeds the required roadway width, the City shall use the excess width to create bikeways, pedestrian paths, and streetscape features. Require new street connections to implement planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities as outlined in the General Plan and other transportation planning policy documents.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing, with public works projects and planning permit approvals
Resources: General Fund. Repair and install with public works projects and planning permit approvals.
Implementation CE 3-2.d. Where possible, use traditional sidewalk design on both sides of streets with a planter strip between the curb and sidewalk and lowimpact development features.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing, with public works projects and planning permit approvals
99 3.0 CIRCULATION
Resources: Development approvals.
Policy CE 3-3
Provide trees or other shade sources along pedestrian routes. Where street widening would remove substantial shade trees, investigate alternative roadway configurations that would preserve the shade trees.
Implementation CE 3-3.a. Explore a program to fund sidewalk improvement or installation where no sidewalks exist, including sharing of costs with property owners, loans payable at time of sale, etc.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing
Resources: General Fund. Sidewalk improvement funds.
Goal CE 4
Promote transit service and use, as shown in Exhibit 3.3, to serve Cloverdale land use goals.
Policy CE 4-1
Participate in efforts to establish passenger rail service on the SMART right of way.
Implementation CE 4-1.a. Encourage passage of rail bonds and develop appropriate land uses that will support rail ridership. (See CDO 3-8 policy).
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: At City initiation or by potential developers prior to development in the Transit Oriented Development area.
Resources: General Fund, transit planning funds, or developer preparation.
Implementation CE 4-1.b. Develop designs for Citrus Fair Drive and Asti Road (south interchange to First Street) to serve as attractive access routes to the SMART station. Elements shall include traffic calming, shaded pedestrian walkways, protected bicycle lanes, and small convenience commercial spaces near the station.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: At City initiation or by potential developers prior to development in the Transit Oriented Development area.
Resources: General Fund, transit planning funds, or developer preparation.
Policy CE 4-2
Develop a Plan around the Cloverdale SMART station to coordinate pedestrian access with the downtown, provide a source of transit riders within a half-mile radius of the station, and establish destination uses to attract transit riders to Cloverdale.
Implementation CE 4-2.a. Monitor and update Station Area Precise Plan prior to development of major properties within a half mile of the Cloverdale SMART passenger rail station.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department 100
3.0 CIRCULATION
Timeframe: The Station Area Precise Plan Grant has been approved by MTC.
Resources: General Fund, transit planning funds, or developer preparation.
Policy CE 4-3
Support bus service locally, countywide, and beyond county borders.
Implementation CE 4-3.a. Encourage use of the Cloverdale Shuttle (Sonoma County Transit 68) by maintaining schedules that serve the community and by considering the use of distinctive vehicles to bring visibility to the service.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Maintain schedules on an ongoing basis.
Resources: County transit funding and VMT mitigation funds.
Policy CE 4-4
Encourage ride sharing to reduce commute trips.
Implementation CE 4-4.a. Coordinate with regional ridesharing plans.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Goal CE 5
To Reduce Automobile Dependency and Associated Impacts.
State law requires that the City consider vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in any CEQA analysis. Because the General Plan is the City’s blueprint for future development, incorporating strategies that reduce VMT within the General Plan will support compliance with CEQA. Trip reduction strategies will also help reduce traffic congestion, energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, which support overall community health.
Policy CE 5-1
Encourage and support the SCTA in establishing a Regional VMT Mitigation Bank and/or regional VMT impact fee program that can be used to fund effective VMT reduction strategies at a regional level, while also establishing a mechanism for private development to offset their VMT impacts.
Implementation CE 5-1.a. Coordinate with regional VMT efforts.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 5-2
As part of CEQA project review require new development projects to achieve a reduction in vehicle miles traveled compared to baseline conditions. Support SCTA’s efforts in maintaining the regional travel demand model, which will be used to adjust 101
3.0 CIRCULATION
baseline VMT levels over time and allow the City to establish updated VMT benchmarks for project applicants.
Implementation CE 5-2.a. Coordinate with regional VMT efforts.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 5-3
Coordinate with property owners, employers in existing and developing employment centers and the Cloverdale Chamber of Commerce to implement transportation demand management (TDM) strategies.
Implementation CE 5-3.a. Coordinate with local employers, property owners and Chamber of Commerce to establish TDM strategies.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 5-4
Encourage and support car or bike share programs within Cloverdale through partnership with car sharing or bike sharing entities and create pick up and drop off locations throughout the city, including employment and shopping areas, park and ride lots and neighborhood parks.
Implementation CE 5-4.a. Coordinate with car and bike share vendors.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 5-5
Encourage and support shuttle, alternative transportation options, or on demand transit service to create connections between existing transit services and to provide “last mile” solutions for transit users.
Implementation CE 5-5.a. Coordinate with regional and county transit providers.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Goal CE 6
Enhance and improve the safety of all users of the transportation system.
At the core of the California Complete Streets Act is the concept of safety. To ensure that people are willing to travel by means other than the automobile, it is critical to support and facilitate a safe and comfortable environment for all users.
Policy CE 6-1
102
3.0 CIRCULATION
Regularly review multi modal collision and traffic speed data as part of a systemic process to determine the location of high injury collisions involving pedestrians and bicyclists, which impact the public’s perception of safety along the multimodal transportation network.
Implementation CE 6-1.a. Collaborate with SCTA in their Vision Zero efforts to eliminate traffic fatalities and severe injuries. Vision Zero is a strategy to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries while also increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department and Police Department
Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Implementation CE 6-1.b. Collaborate with Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition (SCBC) in creating and implementing the Sonoma County Safe Routes to Schools Program. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) is an approach that promotes walking and bicycling to school safely through a combination of infrastructure improvements, traffic enforcement, safety education, and incentives. SRTS initiatives aim to improve safety and increase levels of physical activity.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department and Police Department, SCTA and SCBC
Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Implementation CE 6-1.c. The City shall implement lighting, signage, and traffic calming improvements.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 6-2
Bicycle and pedestrian education and outreach.
Implementation CE 6-2.a. Work with organizations, with the appropriate expertise, to develop educational and outreach materials and programs for cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers that promote safe bicycling and walking, particularly for children.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 6-3
Bicycle and pedestrian network comfort considerations.
Implementation CE 6-3.a. Maintain a backbone bicycle and pedestrian network that seeks to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian users of all comfort levels (i.e., low level of traffic stress). Bicycle level of traffic stress assesses the perceived comfort of a bicyclist on a bike path shared with cars. For some bicyclists, sharing the road with automobiles is uncomfortable and they do not feel safe. As a result, 103
3.0 CIRCULATION
they may choose to drive over bicycling if there is no safer or more comfortable alternative.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 6-4
Local Roadway Safety Plan.
Implementation CE 6-4.a. Adopt a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) to promote multimodal safety and to allow the City to better compete for safetyrelated grant funding programs such as the Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 6-5
Evaluate potential evacuation routes.
Implementation CE 6-4.a. Evaluate potential evacuation routes to be compliant with state law and legislation in addition to the established US 101 and State Route 128. (See Goal PS 3 and Policy PS 6-1) related to Multi Hazard Emergency Plan.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Goal CE 7
To provide a citywide comprehensive parking system that is integrated with alternate modes of transportation options to efficiently serve the needs of residents, visitors, and businesses.
Policy CE 7-1
Re-evaluate its minimum parking standards and seek to “right-size” parking to meet demand by taking into account shared mobility and micro-mobility trends and available alternative modes of transportation.
Implementation CE 7-1.a. Keep apprised of ongoing technological advancements.
Responsibility: Engineering Department and Community Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 7-2
Encourage park-and-ride activity, shared parking facilities and shared public parking. 104
3.0 CIRCULATION
Implementation CE 7-2.a. Collaborate with downtown businesses and SMART in creating and implementing parking options. The adopted Downtown Plan (See CDO 3-2 policy) includes a more walkable and bikeable city core, which also takes advantage of the proximity to the SMART passenger rail station.
Responsibility: Engineering Department and Community Development Department and SMART
Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Implementation CE 7-2b. Develop variable parking standards that reflect the level of parking demand based on land use, proximity to transit and VMT reduction goals.
Responsibility: Community Development and Engineering Department Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 7-3
Encourage new residential developments in higher density areas to separate the cost of parking from the cost of renting or purchasing living space (i.e. unbundling).
Implementation CE 7-3.a. Collaborate with the development community and Community Development in evaluating unbundled parking strategy.
Responsibility: Engineering Department and Community Development Department and SMART
Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 7-4
Support the safe use of shared mobility and micro mobility options (e.g. bike share, scooters) to connect residences, businesses to key destinations in the City, including SMART station and other public transit nodes and assess the integration of autonomous vehicles into the transportation system.
Implementation CE 7-4.a. Keep apprised of ongoing technological advancements.
Responsibility: Engineering Department and Community Department, SMART
Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 7-5
Develop and leverage curb space management techniques in central Cloverdale in proximity to the SMART station to balance pick-up and drop-off activities with business related loading and unloading zones and monitor on- and off-street parking and loading areas to promote desired curb space usage.
Implementation CE 7-5.a. Collaborate with downtown businesses and SMART in creating and implementing curb space management techniques. 105
3.0 CIRCULATION
Responsibility: Engineering Department and Community Development Department and SMART
Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Goal CE 8
To promote the safe and efficient movement of goods through the city to support business and commercial activity.
Policy CE 8-1
Truck delivery routes.
Implementation CE 8-1.a. The City shall work with local businesses to identify preferred truck delivery routes to access key destinations in the City but also discourage trucks from using local streets. Regularly review and establish designated truck routes in the City to minimize noise impacts on residential areas. (See Policy CE 1-1).
Responsibility: Engineering Department and Community Department, SMART
Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: Capital Improvement Program, project approvals, street improvement fund.
Policy CE 8-2
Promote the safe and efficient movement of goods by rail through the city to support business and commercial activity. The rail line that runs through Cloverdale has historically been used for freight service and SMART passenger service is planned in the future.
Implementation CE 8-2.a. The City shall engage with SMART to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of goods by rail through the city, including decreasing train speeds through the city.
Responsibility: Engineering Department and Community Development Department and SMART
Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Implementation CE 8-2.a. The City shall establish and monitor the effectiveness of railroad quiet zones and make appropriate modifications to minimize noise and promote public safety. (See Goal NE 1).
Responsibility: Engineering Department and Community Development Department and SMART
Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
Policy CE 8-3
106
3.0 CIRCULATION
Promote safe and efficient airport operations through the City to serve the growing population. (See Goal PS 7).
Implementation CE 8-3.a. The Cloverdale Municipal Airport, owned and operated by the City of Cloverdale, serves as a general aviation hub for the area.
The City shall collaborate with the County and Sonoma County Airport Land Use Commission and reference the Cloverdale Municipal Airport Master Plan 2025, adopted in 2008, as the guiding plan for airport improvements and land use regulations.
Responsibility: Engineering Department and Community Development Department, County of Sonoma, and the Sonoma County
Airport Land Use Commission.
Timeframe: Ongoing.
Resources: General Fund.
HIGHWAY PLAN CONCEPTS
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS
Category Function Types of Standards
Freeway Carry interurban, regional and interstate
traffic
Number of travel lanes, controlled access,
divided by median or barriers, gradeseparated interchanges.
Arterial Carry large traffic volumes over long
distances
Number of travel lanes, spacing
signalization, parking restrictions, right-ofway width, roadway width Collector Carry local area traffic to the arterial
system
Number of travel lanes, signalization,
right-of-way width, roadway width
Local Road Provide access to property; carry local
traffic
Number of travel lanes, right-of-way width
HIGHWAY PLAN CONCEPTS
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS
Level Traffic Condition
LOS "A" •Free flow conditions
•Low volumes
•High operating speed
•Uninterrupted flow
•No restriction on maneuverability
•Drivers maintain desired speeds
•Little or no delays
107
3.0 CIRCULATION
LOS "B" •Stable flow condition
•Operating speeds beginning to be restricted
LOS "C" •Stable flow but speed and maneuverability restricted by higher traffic volumes •Satisfactory operating speed for urban conditions
•Delays at signals
LOS "D" •Approaching unstable flow
•Low speeds
•Major delays at signals
•Little freedom to maneuver
LOS "E" •Lower operating speeds
•Volume at or near capacity
•Unstable flow
•Major delays and stoppages
LOS "F" •Forced flow conditions
•Low speeds
•Volumes below capacity, may be zero
•Stoppages for long periods because of downstream congestion 108
109
110
111
112
NORTH AMERICA | EUROPE | AFRICA | AUSTRALIA | ASIA
WWW.FIRSTCARBONSOLUTIONS.COM
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report
General Plan Circulation Element Update Project
City of Cloverdale, Sonoma County, California
State Clearinghouse Number 2024010982
Prepared for:
City of Cloverdale
Planning and Community Development Department
124 North Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
707.894.1723
Contact: Kevin Thompson, Assistant City Manager
Prepared by:
FirstCarbon Solutions
2999 Oak Road, Suite 250
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
925.357.2562
Contact: Mary Bean, Project Director
Madelyn Dolan, Project Manager
Date: June 12, 2024
113
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Acronyms and Abbreviations FirstCarbon Solutions i
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec00-02 Acronyms.docx
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AB Assembly Bill
ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CAO Clean Up and Abatement Orders
CAP Climate Action Plan
CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CCR California Code of Regulations
CDO Cease and Desist Orders
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CRA Cultural Resources Assessment
CRHR California Register of Historical Resources
CTP Comprehensive Transportation Plan
DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control
EIR Environmental Impact Report
EV Electric Vehicle
FAR floor area ratio
FCS FirstCarbon Solutions
FHSZ Fire Hazard Severity Zone
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
GHG greenhouse gas
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
LEED® Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
LOS Level of Service
LRA Local Responsibility Area
LRSP Local Roadway Safety Plan
LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank
MM Mitigation Measure
MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
mph miles per hour
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission
MUTCD Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways 114
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Acronyms and Abbreviations FirstCarbon Solutions ii
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec00-02 Acronyms.docx NCCP Natural Communities Conservation Plan
NOC Notice of Completion
NOP Notice of Preparation
OHV Off-Highway Vehicle
OPR Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
PDA Priority Development Areas
PRC Public Resources Code
PV photovoltaics
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SB Senate Bill
SCBC Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition
SCH State Clearinghouse
SCTA Sonoma County Transportation Authority
SCTM Sonoma County Transportation Authority Travel Demand Model SHS State Highway System
SMART Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit
SOI Sphere of Influence
SP Service Population
SR State Route
SRA State Responsibility Area
SRTS Safe Routes to School
State Water Board California State Water Resources Control Board STN State Transportation Network
TAM Transit Asset Management
TCR Tribal Cultural Resource
TDM Transportation Demand Management
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TISG Transportation Impact Study Guide
TPM Transportation Performance Management
US-101 United States Highway 101
VHFHSZ Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
115
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Introduction
FirstCarbon Solutions 1-1
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec01-00 Introduction.docx CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 - Overview of the CEQA Process
This Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (Draft Subsequent EIR) is prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Circulation Element Update Project (State Clearinghouse Number 2024010982). This document is prepared in conformance with CEQA (California Public Resources Code [PRC], § 21000, et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations [CCR], Title 14, § 15000, et seq.). This Draft Subsequent EIR is intended to serve as an informational document for the public agency decision-makers and the public regarding the proposed General Plan Circulation Element Update Project (Circulation Element Update).
1.1.1 - Overview
The proposed Circulation Element Update consists of updating the Circulation Element of the City of Cloverdale General Plan (General Plan) to address Senate Bill (SB) 743 and the transition of CEQA transportation analysis from congestion-based metrics, such as Level of Service (LOS), to the Statemandated metric of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).
The proposed Circulation Element Update would ensure consistency with State law regarding Complete Streets, would develop updated roadway cross sections for arterials and collectors, and would incorporate elements from the current City Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The Circulation Element Update would also include new goals and policies related to VMT analysis and reductions considering the City’s Climate Emergency Declaration (Resolution Number 91-2019) on September 11, 2019. Chapter 2, Project Description, provides a complete description of the proposed Circulation Element Update.
1.1.2 - Purpose and Authority
This Draft Subsequent EIR provides a project-level analysis of the environmental effects of the General Plan Circulation Element Update Project. The environmental impacts of the proposed Circulation Element Update are analyzed in the Draft Subsequent EIR to the degree of specificity appropriate, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15146. This document addresses the potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that may be associated with the planning, construction, or operation of the proposed Circulation Element Update. It also identifies appropriate and feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to significantly reduce or avoid these impacts. CEQA requires that an EIR contain, at a minimum, certain specific elements. These elements are contained in this Draft Subsequent EIR and include:
Table of Contents
Introduction
Executive Summary
Project Description
116
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Introduction
FirstCarbon Solutions 1-2
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec01-00 Introduction.docx Environmental Setting, Significant Environmental Impacts, and Mitigation Measures Cumulative Impacts
Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Alternatives to the Proposed Project
Growth-Inducing Impacts
Effects Found not to be Significant
Areas of Known Controversy
1.1.3 - Lead Agency Determination
The City of Cloverdale is designated as the Lead Agency for the proposed Circulation Element Update. CEQA Guidelines Section 15367 defines the lead agency as “. . . the public agency, which has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project.” Other public agencies may use this Draft Subsequent EIR in the decision-making or permit process and consider the information in this Draft Subsequent EIR along with other information that may be presented during the CEQA process.
This Draft Subsequent EIR was prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS), an environmental consultant. Prior to public review, it was extensively reviewed and evaluated by the City of Cloverdale. This Draft Subsequent EIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Cloverdale as required by CEQA. Lists of organizations and persons consulted and the report preparation personnel is provided in Chapter 7 of this Draft Subsequent EIR.
1.2 - Scope of the Draft Subsequent EIR
This Draft Subsequent EIR addresses the potential environmental effects of the proposed Circulation Element Update. The City of Cloverdale issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the proposed Circulation Element Update on January 31, 2024, which circulated between January 31, 2024, and March 1, 2024, for the statutory 30-day public review period. The scope of this Draft Subsequent EIR includes the potential environmental impacts identified in the NOP and issues raised by agencies and the public in response to the NOP. The NOP is contained in Appendix A of this Draft Subsequent EIR.
Three comment letters were received in response to the NOP. They are listed in Table 1-1 and provided in Appendix A of this Draft Subsequent EIR.
Table 1-1: NOP Comment Letters
Agency/Organization Author Date
Topics Discussed in
Comment Letter
Location Comment is
Addressed/Discussed in
Draft Subsequent EIR
Public Agencies
Native American
Heritage
Commission (NAHC)
Cameron Vela,
Cultural Resources
Analyst
February 6, 2024 Summarizes
California
Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA)
requirements and
N/A
117
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Introduction
FirstCarbon Solutions 1-3
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec01-00 Introduction.docx Agency/Organization Author Date
Topics Discussed in
Comment Letter
Location Comment is
Addressed/Discussed in
Draft Subsequent EIR
background
information.
Summarizes
Assembly Bill (AB) 52
and Senate Bill (SB)
18 requirements for
cultural and tribal
cultural resources.
Section 4, Effects
Found not to be
Significant
Provides
recommendations for
Cultural Resource
Assessments (CRAs)
Section 4, Effects
Found not to be
Significant
County of Sonoma Johannes
Hoevertsz
February 26, 2024 The commenter has
no comments on the
proposed Circulation
Element Update.
N/A
California
Department of
Transportation
(Caltrans)
Liesel Ayon,
Associated
Transportation
Planner; and
Yunsheng Luo,
Branch Chief, Local
Development
Review
March 1, 2024 Provides information
regarding the
screening criteria and
components of a
Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT)
analysis
Section 3.1,
Transportation and
Traffic
Suggests referencing
the Caltrans District 4
Pedestrian Plan and
the Caltrans District 4
Bike Plan in the Draft
Subsequent
Environmental
Impact Report (Draft
Subsequent EIR)
Section 3.1,
Transportation and
Traffic
Encourages equitable
and ongoing public
engagement in the
proposed Circulation
Element Update
process.
Chapter 1,
Introduction
Source: Compiled by FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS). 2024.
At the virtual public Scoping Meeting held on February 13, 2024, an individual commenter, Brooke Greene, identified the following potential area of concern:
Restoring school bus service
118
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Introduction
FirstCarbon Solutions 1-4
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec01-00 Introduction.docx
1.2.1 - Environmental Issues Determined not to be Significant The NOP identified topical areas that were determined not to be significant. An explanation of why each area is determined not to be significant is provided in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant. These topical areas are as follows:
Aesthetics, Light, and Glare Hydrology and Water Quality Agricultural and Forestry Resources Land Use and Planning Air Quality Mineral Resources
Biological Resources Noise
Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Population and Housing Geology, Soils, and Seismicity Public Services
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Recreation
Energy Utilities and Service Systems
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Wildfire
1.2.2 - Potentially Significant Environmental Issues
The NOP found that the following topical area may contain potentially significant environmental issues that will require further analysis in the Draft Subsequent EIR.
Transportation and Traffic
1.3 - Organization of the Draft Subsequent EIR
This Draft Subsequent EIR is organized into the following main sections:
Chapter ES: Executive Summary. This chapter includes a summary of the proposed Circulation Element Update and alternatives to be addressed in the Draft Subsequent EIR. A brief description of the areas of controversy and issues to be resolved and overview of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), in addition to a table that summarizes the impacts, mitigation measures, and levels of significance after mitigation, are also included in this section.
Chapter 1: Introduction. This chapter provides an introduction and overview describing the purpose of this Draft Subsequent EIR, its scope and components, and its review and certification process.
Chapter 2: Project Description. This chapter includes a detailed description of the proposed Circulation Element Update, including its location, site, and project characteristics. A discussion of the project objectives, intended uses of the Draft Subsequent EIR, responsible agencies, and approvals that are needed for the proposed Circulation Element Update are also provided.
Chapter 3: Environmental Impact Analysis. This chapter analyzes the environmental impacts of the proposed Circulation Element Update. Impacts are organized into major topic areas.
Each topic area includes a description of the environmental setting, methodology, significance 119
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Introduction
FirstCarbon Solutions 1-5
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec01-00 Introduction.docx criteria, impacts, mitigation measures, and significance after mitigation. The specific environmental topics that are addressed within Chapter 3 are as follows:
- Section 3.1—Transportation and Traffic: Addresses potential impacts related to the local and regional roadway system and public transportation, bicycle, and pedestrian access. Chapter 4: Effects Found not to be Significant. This chapter contains analysis of the topical sections not addressed in Chapter 3.
Chapter 5: Other CEQA Considerations. This chapter provides a summary of significant irreversible environmental impacts, including unavoidable and growth-inducing impacts and mandatory findings of significance.
Chapter 6: Alternatives to the Proposed Project. This chapter compares the impacts of the proposed Circulation Element Update with the No Project Alternative/Existing General Plan. In addition, alternatives initially considered but rejected from further consideration are discussed.
Chapter 7: Persons and Organizations Consulted/List of Preparers. This chapter contains a full list of persons and organizations that were consulted during the preparation of this Draft Subsequent EIR. This chapter also contains a full list of the authors who assisted in the preparation of the Draft Subsequent EIR, by name and affiliation. Appendices. The Draft Subsequent EIR appendices includes all notices and other procedural documents pertinent to the Draft Subsequent EIR as well as all technical material prepared to support the analysis.
1.4 - Documents Incorporated by Reference
As permitted by CEQA Guidelines Section 15150, this Draft Subsequent EIR has referenced several technical studies, analyses, and previously certified environmental documentation. Information from the documents, which have been incorporated by reference, has been briefly summarized in the appropriate section(s). The relationship between the incorporated part of the referenced document and the Draft Subsequent EIR has also been described. The documents and other sources that have been used in the preparation of this Draft Subsequent EIR include but are not limited to:
City of Cloverdale General Plan
City of Cloverdale General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report City of Cloverdale Circulation Element Update
City of Cloverdale Municipal Code
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15150(b), the General Plan and the referenced documents and other sources used in the preparation of the Draft Subsequent EIR are available for review at the City of Cloverdale Planning and Community Development Department at the address shown in Section 1.6 below.
120
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Introduction
FirstCarbon Solutions 1-6
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec01-00 Introduction.docx
1.5 - Review of the Draft Subsequent EIR
Upon completion of the Draft Subsequent EIR, the City of Cloverdale filed a Notice of Completion (NOC) with the State Office of Planning and Research to begin the public review period (PRC § 21161). Concurrent with the NOC, this Draft Subsequent EIR has been distributed to responsible and trustee agencies, other affected agencies, surrounding cities, and interested parties, as well as all parties requesting a copy of the Draft Subsequent EIR in accordance with Public Resources Code 21092(b)(3). During the public review period, the Draft Subsequent EIR, including the technical appendices, is available for review at the City of Cloverdale Planning and Community Development Department. The address for each location is provided below:
City of Cloverdale
Planning and Community Development Department
124 North Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
The Draft Subsequent EIR is also available for review at the following website:
https://www.cloverdale.net/243/Long-Range-Planning.
Agencies, organizations, and interested parties have the opportunity to comment on the Draft Subsequent EIR during the 45-day public review period. Written comments on this Draft Subsequent EIR should be addressed to:
Kevin Thompson, Assistant City Manager
City of Cloverdale
Planning and Community Development
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Phone: 707.894.1723
Email: [email protected]
Submittal of electronic comments in Microsoft Word or Adobe PDF format is encouraged. Upon completion of the public review period, written responses to all significant environmental issues raised will be prepared and made available for review by the commenting agencies at least 10 days prior to the public hearing before the City Council on the proposed Circulation Element Update, at which the certification of the Final EIR will be considered. Comments received and the responses to comments will be included as part of the record for consideration by decision-makers for the proposed Circulation Element Update.
121
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Project Description FirstCarbon Solutions 2-1
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec02-00 Project Description.docx CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (Draft Subsequent EIR) analyzes the potential environmental effects of the proposed General Plan Circulation Element Update Project (Circulation Element Update) in the City of Cloverdale.
2.1 - Project Location and Setting
2.1.1 - Location
The project site is located in the City of Cloverdale (City), in Sonoma County, California (Exhibit 2-1).
The City is situated at the northern end of Alexander Valley, where the Mayacamas Mountains meet the Coast Range. Additionally, the City is located approximately 34 miles northwest of Santa Rosa, 25 miles south of Ukiah, and approximately 67 miles southeast of the town of Mendocino (Exhibit 2-2).
The City encompasses 2.5 square miles (approximately 1,601 acres), while the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI) encompasses approximately 2.3 additional square miles beyond the city limits. The Russian River flows through the center of the Alexander Valley, and the developed portion of the City is located on the valley floor west of the Russian River and east of the Coast Range.
Prevalent land uses in the City include Low Density Residential, Destination Commercial, Conservation, and Medium Density Residential. Existing land uses are mapped in Exhibit 2-3.
Regional access to the City is provided via highways and major roadways, including United States Highway 101 (US-101), State Route (SR) 128, and Cloverdale Boulevard. In addition, Sonoma County Transit SR-60 provides daily bus service to and from the City with connections to the greater Sonoma County area.1 The Amtrak Bus Thruway Service provides bus service to the City via Cloverdale Depot, located at Citrus Fair Drive and Asti Road.2
There are two active Cleanup and Abatement Orders listed on the Cortese List within the City.3 The first facility is Masonite Corporation Cloverdale, related to contaminated ground water; the Cleanup and Abatement Order was put into effect on June 1, 1983. The second facility is Krasilsa Pacific Farms LLC, related to miscellaneous facility waste sources; the Cleanup and Abatement Order was put into effect on October 21, 2019.
1 City of Cloverdale. Transit Services. Website: https://www.cloverdale.net/267/Transit-Services. Accessed October 26, 2023. 2 Ibid.
3 California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board). List of “active” Cease and Desist Orders (CDO) and Clean Up and Abatement Orders (CAO) from State Water Board. Website: https://calepa.ca.gov/wpcontent/uploads/sites/6/2016/10/SiteCleanup-CorteseList-CDOCAOList.xlsx. Accessed December 14, 2023. 122
123
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Project Description FirstCarbon Solutions 2-3
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec02-00 Project Description.docx Exhibit 2-1: Regional Location Map
124
125
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Project Description FirstCarbon Solutions 2-5
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec02-00 Project Description.docx Exhibit 2-2: Local Vicinity Map
126
127
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Project Description FirstCarbon Solutions 2-7
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec02-00 Project Description.docx Exhibit 2-3: General Plan Land Use Map
128
129
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Project Description FirstCarbon Solutions 2-9
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec02-00 Project Description.docx There are no active hazardous waste and substance sites listed in the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database within the City, and there are 48 Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) sites within the City according to the California State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Water Board’s) GeoTracker database. However, all 48 of these sites are listed as Completed–Case Closed.4,5
2.1.2 - Existing Circulation Element
The City of Cloverdale General Plan (General Plan) was adopted by the City Council on May 13, 2009, and was last amended on November 10, 2021. The current General Plan includes a Circulation Element that identifies guiding principles for moving people and goods within the City and identifies the infrastructure necessary to ensure that the transportation network can adequately serve the City at General Plan buildout.
The current Circulation Element utilizes Level of Service (LOS) as a threshold of significance rather than Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). The traditional measure of circulation system performance has been LOS, which rates roadway traffic flow characteristics from Level A (free-flowing traffic) to Level F (gridlock). LOS generally serves as an indicator of the performance of the circulation system. Poor LOS (typically Levels D, E, and F) has historically been defined as an environmental impact requiring mitigation).
2.2 - Proposed Circulation Element
2.2.1 - Purpose of a Circulation Element
State law dictates that each city and county in California prepare a Circulation Element as part of the local government’s long-range General Plan, which serves as a guide for the physical development of the community. The Circulation Element of a local government’s General Plan must identify the general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, military airports and ports, and other local public utilities and facilities. The Circulation Element must also plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel in a manner that is suitable to the rural, suburban, or urban context of the General Plan.
2.2.2 - Circulation Element Update Process
The Circulation Element Update process consists of the following steps:
Reviewing existing transportation conditions and policies; Developing updated transportation goals, policies, and programs; 4 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). List of Hazardous Waste and Substances sites from Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database. Website:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search?cmd=search&reporttype=CORTESE&site_type=CSITES,FUDS&status=ACT,BKLG,C OM&reporttitle=HAZARDOUS+WASTE+AND+SUBSTANCES+SITE+LIST+%28CORTESE%29. Accessed December 14, 2023. 5 California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board). List of Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites from the State Water Board’s GeoTracker database. Website:
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/search?CMD=search&case_number=&business_name=&main_street_name=&city=&zip=&c ounty=&SITE_TYPE=LUFT&oilfield=&STATUS=&BRANCH=&MASTER_BASE=&Search=Search. Accessed December 14, 2023. 130
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Project Description FirstCarbon Solutions 2-10
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec02-00 Project Description.docx Preparing the City’s planned transportation network maps; Developing strategies to manage transportation demand and congestion; Updating the City’s transportation study guidelines;
Preparing draft and final Circulation Element updates; Conducting public outreach;
Analyzing potential environmental impacts pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Notice of Preparation and Public Scoping Meeting
The Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Subsequent EIR for the General Plan Update was circulated from January 31, 2024, to March 1, 2024, to commenting agencies, the State Clearinghouse (SCH), and the public to share information about the proposed Circulation Element Update and receive input on the scope of the environmental issues to be addressed in the Draft Subsequent EIR. A Scoping Meeting was held on February 13, 2024, which was attended by one member of the public.
The City received three comment letters on the NOP and one public comment at the Scoping Meeting. Copies of these letters are provided in Appendix A of this Draft Subsequent EIR, and the comments are summarized in Section 1.2, Scope of the Draft Subsequent EIR.
2.3 - Project Characteristics
2.3.1 - Proposed Circulation Element Update
The City proposes to update the Circulation Element of the General Plan to address Senate Bill (SB) 743 and the transition of CEQA transportation analysis from congestion-based metrics, such as LOS, to the State-mandated metric of VMT.
The proposed Circulation Element Update would ensure consistency with State law regarding Complete Streets, would develop updated roadway cross-sections for arterials and collectors, and would incorporate elements from the current City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The Circulation Element Update would also include new goals and policies related to VMT analysis and reductions considering the City’s Climate Emergency Declaration (Resolution Number 91-2019) on September 11, 2019. The Declaration calls for a transition away from fossil fuels and an urgent collaborative mobilization effort focused on enacting policies, such as several transportation measures that would help reduce emissions, including employing an electrified fleet mix and clean vehicles, updating the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, utilizing the Complete Streets model to support multimodal transit, and continuing implementation of safe routes to school.
2.3.2 - Circulation Element Update Policies and Programs The proposed Circulation Element Update identifies the guiding principles for moving people and goods within the City and identifies the infrastructure necessary to ensure that the transportation network will serve the City at General Plan buildout. The goals, policies, and implementation actions would support the City’s compliance with the State-mandated requirements to implement Complete Streets and make efforts to reduce VMT in the community. 131
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Project Description FirstCarbon Solutions 2-11
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec02-00 Project Description.docx The proposed Circulation Element Update supports a multimodal transportation system that serves the mobility needs of all residents and manages traffic congestion as the City grows and changes.
Policies in the proposed Circulation Element Update would continue the City’s commitment to a Complete Streets strategy to provide residents, employees, and visitors with a range of options for travel by supporting existing and planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities and addressing transit services within the City and region. Additionally, the proposed Circulation Element Update identifies the roadway system necessary for automobile traffic by setting LOS goals, VMT goals, a hierarchy of roads, and areas where road improvements are necessary.
Furthermore, since the last General Plan update, California has changed the way that environmental impacts associated with the circulation system are defined and analyzed under CEQA. As described above, the current Circulation Element uses LOS as an environmental threshold and measure of circulation system performance. On July 1, 2020, SB 743 became effective. Implementing SB 743, the City’s environmental thresholds recognize that VMT is generally the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. VMT is a measure of the amount of travel for all vehicles in a geographic region. Accordingly, the proposed Circulation Element Update would change the focus of the Circulation Element from widening roadways and intersections to reducing the total vehicle travel within the community. The proposed goals, policies, and programs can be reviewed in Appendix B.
State law does permit the City to use LOS standards and policies when evaluating development projects and planning required transportation improvements to such development; therefore, the proposed Circulation Element Update includes goals and policies that support congestion relief (LOS), as well as reduction of total VMT.
2.3.3 - General Plan Amendment
The Draft Subsequent EIR addresses the environmental impacts related to implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update. In accordance with State law, the City proposes to adopt a General Plan Amendment to update the General Plan’s existing Circulation Element, including identifying updated goals, policies, and actions.
2.4 - Project Objectives
The underlying purpose of the Circulation Element Update is to address the current and future needs of residents, businesses, employees, and visitors to the City. The objectives of the proposed Circulation Element Update are as follows:
Update City policies in the Circulation Element to comply with State law, including State regulations related to conformance with SB 743.
Support the City’s compliance with State-mandated requirements to implement Complete Streets and make efforts to reduce VMT in the community. Implement Complete Streets throughout the City.
Recognize the importance of reducing VMT in the City. Encourage a range of options for travel to work, shopping, and leisure destinations. 132
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Project Description FirstCarbon Solutions 2-12
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec02-00 Project Description.docx Prioritize the efficiency of goods movement.
Adopt policies that guide the direction of physical development in the City in a way that encourages economic vitality and promotes quality of life.
2.5 - Intended Uses of this Draft Subsequent EIR
This Draft Subsequent EIR is being prepared by the City of Cloverdale to assess the potential environmental impacts that may arise in connection with actions related to implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15367, the City of Cloverdale is the lead agency for the proposed Circulation Element Update and has discretionary authority over the proposed Circulation Element Update and project approvals. The Draft Subsequent EIR is intended to address all public infrastructure improvements and all future development that are within the parameters of the proposed Circulation Element Update.
2.5.1 - Discretionary and Ministerial Actions
Discretionary approvals and permits are required by the City for implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update. The proposed Circulation Element Update would require the following discretionary approvals and actions:
General Plan Amendment
Adopt Circulation Element Update
Certify Subsequent EIR
2.5.2 - Responsible and Trustee Agencies
There are no Responsible Agencies identified for the proposed Circulation Element Update.
However, a number of other agencies, including Trustee agencies, may potentially provide information as commenting agencies, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.4(a) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15375. The Draft Subsequent EIR will provide environmental information to these agencies and other public agencies which may be required to grant approvals or coordinate with other agencies as part of project implementation. These agencies may include, but are not limited to, the following:
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)
133
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Environmental Impact Analysis FirstCarbon Solutions 3-1
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-00 Env Impact Analysis.docx CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Organization of Issue Areas
This Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (Draft Subsequent EIR) provides analysis of impacts for those environmental topics where it was determined in the Notice of Preparation (NOP), or through subsequent analysis, that the proposed General Plan Circulation Element Update Project (Circulation Element Update) would result in “potentially significant impacts.” Section 3.1 discusses the environmental impacts that may result with approval and implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update.
Issues Addressed in this Draft Subsequent EIR
The following environmental issues are addressed in Chapter 3:
Transportation and Traffic
Level of Significance
Determining the severity of project impacts is fundamental to achieving the objectives of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 requires that decisionmakers mitigate, as completely as is feasible, the significant impacts identified in the Draft Subsequent EIR. If the Draft Subsequent EIR identifies any significant unmitigated impacts, CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 requires decision-makers, in approving a project, to adopt a statement of overriding considerations that explains why the benefits of the project outweigh the adverse environmental consequences identified in the Draft Subsequent EIR.
The level of significance for each impact examined in this Draft Subsequent EIR was determined by considering the predicted magnitude of the impact against the applicable threshold. Thresholds were developed using criteria from the CEQA Guidelines and checklist; State, federal, and local regulatory schemes; local/regional plans and ordinances; accepted practice; consultation with recognized experts; and other professional opinions.
Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measure Format
The format adopted in this Draft Subsequent EIR to present the evaluation of impacts is described and illustrated below.
Summary Heading of Impact
Impact TRANS-1: An impact summary heading appears immediately preceding the impact description (Summary Heading of Impact in this example). The impact number identifies the section of the report (TRANS for Transportation and Traffic in this example) and the sequential order of the impact (1 in this example) within that section. To the right of the impact number is the impact statement, which identifies the potential impact. 134
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Environmental Impact Analysis FirstCarbon Solutions 3-2
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-00 Env Impact Analysis.docx Impact Analysis
A narrative analysis follows the impact statement. In some cases, the impact discussion will reference State and federal regulations and agency policies that would fully or partially reduce the impact. In addition, policies and programs from applicable local land use plans that partially or fully address impacts may be cited and the proposed project would be evaluated in the context of these requirements.
Level of Significance Before Mitigation
This section identifies the level of significance of the impact before any mitigation is proposed.
Mitigation Measures
Project-specific mitigation measures, beyond requirements contained in other documents or applicable by law, are set off with a summary heading and described using the format presented below:
MM TRANS-1 Project-specific mitigation is identified that would reduce the impact to the lowest degree feasible. The mitigation number links the particular mitigation to the impact it is associated with (TRANS-1 in this example); mitigation measures are numbered sequentially.
Level of Significance After Mitigation
This section identifies the resulting level of significance of the impact following mitigation. 135
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-1
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx
3.1 - Transportation and Traffic
3.1.1 - Introduction
This section describes existing conditions related to transportation in the project area as well as the relevant regulatory framework. This section also evaluates the possible impacts related to transportation that could result from implementation of the proposed General Plan Circulation Element Update Project (Circulation Element Update).
This analysis examines the potential impacts to the City of Cloverdale’s (City’s) overall transportation system and evaluates the effects related to transportation including conflicts with applicable plans and policies, hazards, changes in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) per capita, and emergency vehicle access that may result from the implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update. Future projects consistent with the proposed Circulation Element Update would be evaluated for projectspecific impacts related to transportation at the time they are proposed and in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statutes and guidelines.
The descriptions and analysis in this section are based, in part, on statements, data, and figures provided by the following reference materials:
City of Cloverdale website1
City of Cloverdale General Plan2
Sonoma County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP): Moving Forward 2050 (Moving Forward 2050)3
Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA) Travel Demand Model (SCTM) Plan Bay Area 2050: A Vision for the Future (Plan Bay Area 2050)4 The following public comments were received during the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (Draft Subsequent EIR) Notice of Preparation (NOP) scoping period related to transportation:
Request to restore school bus service.
Information regarding the screening criteria and components of a VMT analysis. Suggestion to reference the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 4 Pedestrian Plan and the Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan in the Draft Subsequent EIR.
3.1.2 - Environmental Setting
Roadway Facilities
The following describes roadway facilities within and adjacent to the City of Cloverdale (Exhibit 3.1-1). 1 City of Cloverdale. 2024. Transit Services. Website: https://www.cloverdale.net/267/Transit-Services. Accessed March 19, 2024. 2 City of Cloverdale. 2009. General Plan. Revised January 28, 2015. 3 Sonoma County Transit Authority. 2021. Sonoma County Comprehensive Transportation Plan: Moving Forward 2050. September. 4 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2021. Plan Bay Area 2050: A Vision for the Future (Plan Bay Area 2050). October.
136
137
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-3
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Exhibit 3.1-1: Street Classifications
138
139
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-5
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Regional
United States Highway 101
United States Highway 101 (US-101) is a four-lane highway that extends north to south within the eastern side of the City. US-101 is a heavily traveled highway connecting San Francisco to coastal regions to the north (Marin County and Sonoma County), south (San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County), and beyond. Three US-101 interchanges serve the City, located at California State Route (SR) 128 (referred to as North Redwood Highway), Citrus Fair Drive, and Santana Drive.
State Route 128
SR-128 is a two-lane highway that extends northwest from the City connecting to North Cloverdale Boulevard just north of the city limits. East of North Cloverdale Boulevard, SR-128 is referred to as North Redwood Highway, and west of North Cloverdale Boulevard, it is referred to as Oat Valley Road.
Local
Arterials
Arterials are generally classified by the City as roadways carrying large volumes over long distances.
Various arterials within and adjacent to the City are described below.
Dutcher Creek Road
Dutcher Creek Road is a north–south arterial with one lane, running just west of US-101. It connects Cloverdale Boulevard in the north to Dry Creek Road, south of the City.
Kelly Road
A segment of Kelly Road connecting to Dutcher Creek Road is an east–west arterial with one lane.
Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale Boulevard is a north–south arterial, generally with one to two lanes in each direction, connecting SR-128 in the north to Dutcher Creek Road in the south.
Collectors
The City generally classifies collectors as roadways that carry local area traffic to the arterial system.
Various collectors within the City are described below.
Asti Road
Asti Road is a north–south collector with unmarked lanes in each direction one lane in each direction running just east of US-101. It connects East First Street to Geyserville Avenue southeast of the City.
The speed limit is 45 miles per hour (mph).
1st Street
1st Street is an east–west collector with one lane in each direction connecting South Franklin Street in the west to Crocker Road in the east. The speed limit is 25 mph. 140
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-6
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx North Jefferson Street
North Jefferson Street is primarily a north–south collector with one lane in each direction connecting the western city limits to East 1st Street in the south.
Crocker Road
The segment of Crocker Road from East 1st Street to the city limits in the west is an east–west collector with one lane in each direction.
South Franklin Street
South Franklin Street is a north–south collector with one lane in each direction connecting North Franklin Street and 1st Street to South Cloverdale Boulevard.
Healdsburg Avenue
Healdsburg Avenue is an east–west collector with one lane in each direction connecting Port Circle in the east to South Cloverdale Boulevard in the west.
West Cherry Creek Road
West Cherry Creek Road is a one-lane, east–west collector connecting the western city limits to South Cloverdale Boulevard.
West Brookside Drive
The segment of West Brookside Drive connecting South Foothill Boulevard to South Cloverdale Boulevard is an east–west collector with one lane in each direction.
Elbridge Avenue
The segment of Elbridge Avenue connecting South Foothill Boulevard to South Cloverdale Boulevard is an east–west collector with one lane in each direction.
Treadway Drive
The segment of Treadway Drive connecting South Foothill Boulevard to South Cloverdale Boulevard is an east–west collector with one lane in each direction.
Existing Public Transit Service and Facilities
The City has bus and rail service provided by three transit providers: Sonoma County Transit, Amtrak, and Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART). Table 3.1-1 displays operational information for these services. Exhibit 3.1-2 illustrates the existing transit system. 141
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-7
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Exhibit 3.1-2: Existing Transit System
142
143
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-9
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Table 3.1-1: Public Transit Service and Facilities
Service Description
Cloverdale Shuttle, Local 68 Provides local weekday shuttle service within the City. Route 68 primarily travels along Cloverdale Boulevard beginning in the north at Champlain Avenue and ending in the south at Treadway Drive.
Sonoma County Transit, Route
60 Provides daily bus service to and from the City with connections to the greater Sonoma County Area.
Amtrak Thruway Service Provides intercity bus service to the City via the Cloverdale Depot located at Citrus Fair Drive and Asti Road.
Planned Sonoma-Marin Area
Rail Transit (SMART)
SMART consists of 70 miles of rail service connecting Sonoma and Marin Counties and serving 16 stations from Cloverdale in Sonoma County to the San Francisco-bound ferry terminal in Larkspur, Marin County. Currently, SMART serves various stations in Larkspur, San Rafael, Marin, Novato, Petaluma, Cotati, Rohnert Park, Santa Rosa, and Sonoma County. Windsor, Healdsburg, Petaluma North, and Cloverdale facilities are planned but not completed currently. The Cloverdale station is expected to be completed as funding becomes available, the timing of which is unknown.
Source: City of Cloverdale. 2024. Sonoma County Transit. 2024.
Bicycle Facilities
The Caltrans Highway Design Manual5classifies bikeways into four categories:
Class I Bikeway (Bike Path)–Provides a completely separate facility for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with crossflow by vehicles minimized. Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane)–Provides a striped lane for one-way bike travel on a street or highway.
Class III Bikeway (Bike Route)–Provides for shared use with pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic. Class IV Bikeway (Separated Bikeway)–Provides for the exclusive use of bicycles and includes a separation (e.g., grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible physical barrier, or on-street parking) required between the separated bikeway and the through vehicular traffic.
The City has several dedicated bike lanes to provide bicycle circulation throughout the City (Exhibit
3.1-3). A Class I Bikeway is located along the Russian River and a portion of the Cloverdale River Park Trail is located in the northeastern portion of the City; additionally, a Class I Bikeway connects Foothill Boulevard to Shady Lane in the western portion of the City. Class II Bicycle Lanes are located along portions of Asti Road, Santana Drive, South Cloverdale Boulevard, Foothill Boulevard, Citrus Fair Drive, Treadway Drive, Jefferson Street, North Main Street, and West Brookside Drive. Class III Bikeways are located along portions of Foothill Boulevard, East 1st Street, North East Street, North Cloverdale Boulevard, Railroad Avenue, East 2nd Street, and East 3rd Street. 5 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2019. Highway Design Manual. Website: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/design/documents/hdm-complete-12312020a11y.pdf. Accessed March 19, 2024. 144
145
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-11
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Exhibit 3.1-3: Existing and Proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities 146
147
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-13
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian facilities are present throughout the City to varying degrees. They consist of sidewalks, trails, crosswalks, curb ramps, and signals. Pedestrian-oriented land uses, street widths, lighting, and landscaping also contribute to the quality of the pedestrian environment.
Vehicle Miles Traveled
Th City’s existing VMT was calculated using the SCTA SCTM, which uses land use, socioeconomic, and road network data to estimate travel patterns, roadway traffic volumes, and transit volumes.
VMT is calculated by multiplying the number of trips generated by the total distance of each of those trips. One vehicle (regardless of the number of passengers) traveling 1 mile constitutes one “vehicle mile.” This is typically evaluated for the sum of the lengths of all daily weekday trips and can be reported as total VMT or as an efficiency metric, such as VMT per Employee or VMT per Resident.
Both VMT metrics were produced for this Draft Subsequent EIR. VMT estimates include all vehicle types ranging from motorcycle and passenger vehicles to light-duty and heavy-duty trucks. Per capita VMT6tends to increase as a result of greater overall economic activity in the region, higher levels of per-household automobile ownership, and/or a jobs/housing imbalance that contributes to longer average commute distances, as well as in less urban/suburban areas. Table 3.1-2 provides VMT information for the 2019 base year as well as the 2024 baseline.
Table 3.1-2: Existing Conditions VMT
Category 2019 Base Year 2024 Baseline1
Total City Generated VMT2 415,451 434,314
Total City VMT Per Service Population3 28.8 28.0
Home-Based VMT per Resident4 16.0 15.1
Home-Based VMT per Employee5 9.5 9.1
Notes:
VMT = Vehicle Miles Traveled
1 2024 baseline data was interpolated from 2019 Base Year Data from the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA).
2 Total City Generated VMT = All VMT from trips with a start or end in Cloverdale 3 City VMT per Service Population = Total City Generated VMT divided by the number of residents plus employees 4 Home-based VMT per Resident = All VMT from trips with a start or end at a residence in Cloverdale, divided by the number of residents.
5 Home-based Work VMT per Employee = All VMT from “commute” trips between home and work (or work and home), divided by the number of employees. Source: Fehr & Peers. 2024. 6 In this document, VMT per Service Population is used to represent VMT per capita. 148
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-14
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx
3.1.3 - Regulatory Framework
Federal
Federal Highway Administration/Federal Transit Administration The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) established new requirements for Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to set Transportation Performance Management (TPM) targets and to integrate those targets and plans into their planning documents by certain dates. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law carries forward performance-based planning requirements. Beginning in 2018, federal rules require that state Departments of Transportation and MPOs implement federal performance measures. In response, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) have worked with state and regional agencies to identify performance measures that meet the requirements. In California, Caltrans is directly responsible for submitting performance targets and periodic progress reports to federal agencies in a timely manner. MPOs are required to establish targets for the same performance measures on all public roads in the MPO planning area within 180 days after the State establishes each target. MPOs may elect to support the Statewide targets, establish numerical targets specific to their region, or use a combination of both approaches. Furthermore, each MPO must incorporate these short-range targets into their planning and programming processes, including the long-range plan and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Transportation performance measures are managed through different metrics, including safety, bridge and pavement conditions, congestion/system performance, Transit Asset Management (TAM), and transit agency safety plan. States and MPOs must integrate performancebased planning and programming into the long-range transportation plans. Regional transportation plans must include performance measures and targets, as well as a description of progress toward the targets. In addition, the TIP must provide a description on how investment in the TIP will contribute toward achieving those targets in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).
The FHWA defines TPM as a strategic approach that uses system information to make investment and policy decisions to achieve national performance goals by setting and tracking the targets. TPM is systematically applied, a regular ongoing process that provides key information to help decisionmakers, allowing them to understand the investment consequences across transportation assets or modes. It ensures that the targets and measures are developed in cooperative partnerships among decision-makers, stakeholders, and the traveling public, and that those targets are based on data and objective information. The Statewide and Non-metropolitan Transportation Planning and Metropolitan Planning Final Rule establishes that states and MPOs must coordinate their respective targets with each other to ensure consistency to the maximum extent practical. The individual state Departments of Transportation and MPOs are expected to use information and data generated to inform their transportation planning and programming decisions. TPM provides a means to achieve national transportation goals, increase federal aid programs' accountability and transparency, and improve project decision-making through performance-based planning and programming.
State
California Department of Transportation LOS Goals
Caltrans builds, operates, and maintains the State Highway System (SHS), including the interstate highway system. Caltrans’s mission is to improve mobility Statewide. The department operates under 149
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-15
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx strategic goals to provide a safe transportation system, optimize throughput and ensure reliable travel times, improve the delivery of State highway projects, provide transportation choices, and improve and enhance the State’s investments and resources. Caltrans controls the planning of the SHS and accessibility to the system. Caltrans does not have a standard of significance relative to traffic operation as this is no longer a CEQA issue. The new VMT Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide (TISG), published in May 2020, replaced the Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, 2002. As indicated in the TISG, Caltrans is transitioning away from requesting Level of Service (LOS) or other vehicle operations analyses of land use projects and will instead focus on VMT. Caltrans requires encroachment permits from agencies or new development before any construction work may be undertaken within the State’s right-of-way.
Senate Bill 743
In November 2017, the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) released a technical advisory containing recommendations regarding the assessment of VMT, proposed thresholds of significance, and potential mitigation measures for lead agencies to use while implementing the required changes contained in Senate Bill (SB) 743. Also in November 2017, OPR released the proposed text for Section 15064.3, Determining the Significance of Transportation Impacts, which summarized the criteria for analyzing transportation impacts for land use projects and transportation projects and directs lead agencies to “choose the most appropriate methodology to evaluate a project’s VMT, including whether to express the change in absolute terms, per capita, per household or in any other measure.” OPR recommends that for most instances a per service population threshold should be adopted and that a 15 percent reduction below that of existing development would be a reasonable threshold.
As noted in the OPR Guidelines, agencies are directed to choose metrics that are appropriate for their jurisdiction to evaluate the potential impacts of a project in terms of VMT. The deadline for adopting policies to implement SB 743 was July 2020; the change to VMT was formally adopted as part of updates to the CEQA Guidelines in December 2018.
The updated guidelines eliminate the use of automobile delay metrics, such as LOS, from determining significant environmental impacts from vehicle travel. VMT has been identified as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project’s transportation impacts as projects that result in lower=than average VMT support goals of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, while projects that result in higher than average levels of vehicle travel contribute to an increasing rate of GHG emissions.
Projects that are within 0.5 mile of an existing major transit stop, which is defined as a rail transit station, ferry terminal served by bus or rail transit, or at the intersection of two or more major bus routes with service frequencies of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods, are presumed to have lessthan significant impacts if the project has the following characteristics:
Floor area ratio (FAR) greater than 0.75.
Does not include more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking). 150
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-16
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Is consistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by the lead agency, with input from the MPO).
Does not replace affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or highincome residential units.
If a project meets the screening requirements, it is presumed to have a less than significant impact related to VMT.
Complete Street Acts
On September 30, 2008, former Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law Assembly Bill (AB) 1358, the California Complete Streets Act of 2008. As of January 2011, AB 1358 requires any substantive revision of the circulation element of a city or county’s general plan to identify how it will safely accommodate the circulation of all users of the roadway including pedestrians, bicyclists, children, seniors, individuals with disabilities, and transit riders, as well as motorists.
Regional Regulations
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the transportation planning, coordinating, and financing agency for the nine-county Bay Area, including Sonoma County where Cloverdale is located. It also functions as the federally mandated MPO for the region. It is responsible for regularly updating the RTP, a comprehensive blueprint for the development of mass transit, highway, airport, seaport, railroad, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.
SB 375 was adopted as the means for achieving regional transportation-related GHG targets. Among the requirements of SB 375 is the creation of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) that provides a plan for meeting regional targets. The SCS and RTP must be consistent with one other, including action items and financing decisions. MPOs must use transportation and air emissions modeling techniques consistent with guidelines prepared by the California Transportation Commission. The current RTP, Plan Bay Area 2050, is described below.
The MTC has established its policy on Complete Streets in the Bay Area. The policy states that projects funded all, or in part, with regional funds (e.g., federal and State TIP and bridge tolls) must consider the accommodation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, as described in Caltrans Deputy Directive 64. These recommendations do not replace locally adopted policies regarding transportation planning, design, and construction. Instead, these recommendations facilitate the accommodation of pedestrians, including wheelchair users, and bicyclists into all projects where bicycle and pedestrian travel is consistent with current adopted regional and local plans.
Plan Bay Area 2050: A Vision for the Future
The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) is the official comprehensive planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, which is composed of the nine counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma. On October 21, 2021, ABAG and the MTC, the region’s MPO, adopted Plan Bay Area 2050: A Vision for the Future (Plan Bay Area 2050), an integrated transportation and land use strategy through 2050. Defined by 35 151
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-17
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx strategies for housing, transportation, economic vitality, and the environment, Plan Bay Area 2050 lays out a $1.4 trillion vision for policies and investments to make the nine-county region more affordable, connected, diverse, healthy, and economically vibrate for all its residents through 2050 and beyond. The transportation strategies in Plan Bay Area 2050 fall into three categories:
1. Maintain and optimize the existing system.
2. Create healthy and safe streets.
3. Build a next-generation transit system.
As part of the implementing framework for the Plan Bay Area 2050, local governments have identified Priority Development Areas (PDAs) and Transit-Rich Areas (TRAs) to focus growth. PDAs are transit-oriented, infill development opportunity areas within existing communities. TRAs are areas near rail, ferry, or frequent bus service that were not already identified as PDAs. Specifically, these are areas where at least 50 percent of the area is within 0.5 mile of either an existing rail station or ferry terminal (with bus or rail service), a bus stop with peak service frequency of 15 minutes or less, or a planned rail station or planned ferry terminal (with bus or rail service). The central portion of the City is designated as the Downtown/SMART Transit Area PDA.7 Sonoma County Transportation Authority
The MTC requires the local transportation authority, in this case the SCTA, to establish transportation plans that are incorporated into the larger RTP. In Sonoma County, the SCTA carries out the general functions of a Congestion Management Agency, such as preparing a comprehensive TIP among local jurisdictions that describes the strategies to reduce traffic congestion and improve land use decisionmaking.
SCTA is required to prepare, update, and monitor the CTP. The CTP consists of monitoring, performance measurement, and a capital improvement plan for roadways, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and transit services. As required by State legislation, SCTA maintains a travel demand model to forecast proposed changes to the transportation network.
The Sonoma County CTP: Moving Forward 2050 outlines projects and strategies that promote alternate modes of transportation and thereby help to reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality. Local governments have an opportunity to ensure that Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures are adequately factored into the decision-making process as they review new development proposals and make key decisions on planning and zoning matters. Local governments may also choose to support (through resolution or other means) regional TDM measures, including carpool lanes and ride sharing facilities and programs, which could be implemented by other agencies, such as MTC.
7 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2023. Priority Development Areas (Plan Bay Area 2050). Website:
https://opendata.mtc.ca.gov/datasets/4df9cb38d77346a289252ced4ffa0ca0/explore?location=38.797521%2C123.014925%2C13.12. Accessed March 19, 2024. 152
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-18
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx District 4 Bike Plan for the Bay Area
The Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan (Bike Plan) identifies infrastructure improvements that can enhance bicycle safety and mobility throughout District 4 and remove some of the barriers to bicycling in the region. The Bike Plan was developed in cooperation with local and regional partners to ensure that the improvements on the SHS complement proposals for local networks.
The Bike Plan considers all potential bicycle trips but prioritizes utilitarian bicycle travel to work, school, shopping, and other similar purposes or to connect to transit. State highways that serve as recreational or touring routes for bicyclists are also considered in the Bike Plan to meet the safety needs of all highway users. The Bike Plan helps inform investments on the State Transportation Network (STN) by Caltrans and other jurisdictions. Caltrans is required to accommodate the needs of bicyclists in Caltrans projects wherever possible. Many funding programs also require consideration of complete streets improvements as part of a project, such as sidewalks, bike lanes, and crossing improvements. It identifies high priority projects in all Bay Area counties, including Sonoma County.
District 4 Pedestrian Plan for the Bay Area
The Pedestrian Plan implements the Vision Statement and Goals in Toward an Active California, the Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan,
8 and is part of a comprehensive planning process to identify locations with bicycle and pedestrian needs in each Caltrans district across California. The Pedestrian Plan is used by Caltrans staff, as well as regional and local agency partners, to address high priority needs along and across the STN, which includes the SHS and all other multimodal facilities owned and operated by Caltrans, including parallel paths, frontage roads, and other facilities not directly on a SHS mainline.
Local Regulations
City of Cloverdale General Plan
The proposed Circulation Element Update includes the following relevant policies and actions that assist in reducing or avoiding impacts related to transportation:
Goal CE 1 Develop and maintain a balanced vehicular and multimodal transportation system to meet the mobility needs consistent with General Plan land use goals and policies and aligns with California’s SB 743 environmental requirements defined and analyzed under the California Environmental Quality Act. Provide a balance of land uses within the General Plan Study Area for housing, jobs, economic development, recreation, and destination commercial uses.
Policy CE 1-1 Develop and maintain the Circulation Plan network of freeway/highways, arterials, collectors, and local streets. The proposed 8 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2017. Toward and Active California State Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. Website:
https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/transportation-planning/documents/f0020350-activeca-final-plan-2017-05-18- a11y.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2024.
153
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-19
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx streets should be designed to serve the functions they are intended to serve, with adequate capacity and safety and address complete streets.
Implementation CE 1-1.a Design, construct, upgrade, and maintain the automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation system according to the functions they are intended to serve, as shown in Exhibit 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 of the Circulation Element Update and the trails systems in Exhibit 5.1 of the Parks and Recreation Element. Ensure active transportation connections among neighborhoods.
Implementation CE 1-1.b Update design to align with new standards and maintain the existing circulation network through the Capital Improvement Program and Development Impact Fees. The City shall strive to maximize the efficiency of the roadway system within the existing roadway widths, prioritizing strategies such as investing and maintaining advanced traffic signal synchronization systems over roadway widening projects.
Implementation CE 1-1.c Coordinate with the County of Sonoma and Caltrans in addressing regional transportation issues.
Implementation CE 1-1.d Provide funding to repair streets and bicycle facilities that are deteriorated and sidewalks that are in poor repair.
Implementation CE 1-1.e Regularly review and establish designated truck routes in the City to minimize noise impacts on residential areas. Construction truck routes shall be specified to minimize noise impacts. Coordinate with local businesses to identify preferred truck routes to access key destinations in the City. (See Policy CE 8-1).
Policy CE 1-2 Plan and reserve in advance of development, the street alignments, right-of-way and building setbacks necessary to handle anticipated future growth, traffic and bicycle and pedestrian requirements.
Implementation CE 1-2.a Develop and adopt plan lines, if needed, for arterial and collector streets shown in Exhibit 3.1 and Exhibit 3.4 of the Circulation Element Update. Place plan lines in the Zoning Ordinance and require setbacks to be measured from adopted plan lines.
Implementation CE 1-2.b Require new development and expansions of existing development to provide necessary street improvements for the demand of all transportation modes.
Implementation CE 1-2.c Develop and maintain an up-to-date comprehensive street improvement fee for new development to finance General Plan roadway improvements necessary to serve the City at General Plan buildout.
154
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-20
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Policy CE 1-3 Design street systems in residential areas to minimize through traffic, to encourage internal movement by bicycling and walking, to provide connected safer and quieter neighborhoods, to minimize vehicular conflicts at intersections and to ensure that the impact of recreational traffic on local residents is minimized. (See Policy CE 8-1).
Implementation CE 1-3.a Identify and provide directional signs to active transportation and recreational uses that maximize use of arterial and collector streets and minimize or eliminate traffic through residential areas.
Policy CE 1-4 Increase Electric Vehicle (EV) Adoption and Infrastructure.
Implementation CE 1-4.a Develop an EV Readiness Plan that is consistent with Sonoma County EV planning. This plan should establish a path forward to increase EV infrastructure within the City, promote equitable mode shift to EVs, and identify funding for implementation of public charging infrastructure in key locations.
Implementation CE 1-4.b The City shall encourage commercial areas and new multifamily developments to provide dedicated parking for electric vehicles. Create incentives for electric vehicle adoption by providing EV parking only spots in high-traffic convenience locations and public parking EV chargers. Develop a parking space ratio requirement for new and redeveloped commercial, multifamily, residential subdivision, and condominium projects to have a specified amount of EV only parking with chargers.
Implementation CE 1-4.c The City shall require new nonresidential development projects to include the installation of electric vehicle charging stations consistent with the State of California Green Building Code (CALGreen). The charging stations should be sited to provide prioritized access to building entrances.
Implementation CE 1-4.d The City shall require new residential development projects to be “electric vehicle charging ready,” including the installation of highervoltage electric systems to serve for the Level 2 charging of electric vehicles consistent with the California Green Building Code.
Implementation CE 1-4.e The City shall transition the City municipal vehicle fleet to alternative fuel vehicles provided that the alternative fuel vehicle can meet the performance standards required for its use. (See Policy CDO 8-1 of the Conservation, Design, and Open Space Element).
Goal CE 2 Maintain a satisfactory Level of Service for automobile traffic for efficient operational flow not required by CEQA analysis. 155
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-21
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Policy CE 2-1 The City shall strive to achieve Level of Service (LOS) D operation as the planned operating condition at intersections, except for intersections that are operating at LOS E or lower at the time an application for a proposed development project or a specific plan is submitted if no feasible improvements exist to improve the LOS. For public safety, signalization warrants shall be evaluated using MUTCD standards. For projected future conditions the LOS is to be calculated using the average traffic demand over the highest 60-minute period. For all types of control the Level of Service standard is to be applied to the average intersection delay, and not for any single movement or approach. Exceptions to meeting this standard include:
Stop-controlled minor street approaches to either collector or arterial streets;
- Locations where the City Engineer deems improvement to be technically, financially, or environmentally infeasible; - Locations where improvements are needed to meet LOS
standards but are not warranted based on volumes;
Conditions where no feasible improvements exist in order to support safe bike, pedestrian, or transit access to downtown area or the SMART station; or
Locations where attainment would cause loss of the unique character of the downtown, identified historic resources or neighborhood character, distinctive tree canopy, or distinctive watercourses.
Implementation CE 2-1.a The City shall require proposed development projects that could result in increased traffic to include improvements that assure LOS levels do not fall below the established minimum standard. The developer shall analyze the operational benefits of large-scale, automobile capacityfocused improvements to assure that they are balanced against the induced Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) resulting from the improvements. The City shall ensure that improvements are coordinated with roadway improvements programmed for funding through transportation-related impact fees.
Implementation CE 2-1.b Signalize or convert to roundabout control the Healdsburg Avenue and Cloverdale Boulevard Intersection.
Implementation CE 2-1.c Evaluate roundabout or traffic signal configurations and pedestrian and bicycle facilities at the Citrus Fair Drive interchange to promote multimodal safety and accommodate traffic levels related to the overcrossing, offramps, and Asti Road and South Cloverdale Boulevard to achieve LOS D. Alternative designs may be considered if pedestrian and bicycle facilities and LOS D can be achieved by those designs. 156
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-22
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Implementation CE 2-1.d Identify and evaluate potential locations for roundabouts to promote multimodal safety and operations.
Policy CE 2-2 Create a “country road” appearance for Cloverdale Boulevard, First Street east of the freeway, and Asti Road where possible, including narrow pavement, shade trees adjoining travel lanes, parking only where necessary, and protected bicycle and pedestrian ways.
Implementation CE 2-2.a Prepare design plans for Cloverdale Boulevard, First Street east of the freeway, and Asti Road prior to major improvements to those roads.
Goal CE 3 Promote and support an integrated network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, as shown in Exhibit 3.2 of the Circulation Element Update, that allows safe and convenient travel for all users as an alternative to automobile traffic and for community health and enjoyment. Design all streets as complete streets, including arterial and collector roadways, which integrate walking, biking, transit use, and green infrastructure, and natural features (such as creeks and greenways).
Policy CE 3-1 Ensure that streets safety serve all users and provide a network connecting residences, employment areas, services, health care, schools, parks, retail area and public facilities.
Implementation CE 3-1.a Implement programs for bicycle and pedestrian trails in the Parks and Recreation Element.
Implementation CE 3-1.b Maintain an up-to-date bikeways plan in conjunction with the Sonoma County Transportation Agency Countywide bikeways plan.
Implementation CE 3-1.c Integrate bicycle and pedestrian routes with transit stops.
Policy CE 3-2 Provide continuous sidewalks or pedestrian paths along all streets.
Maintain sidewalks in good repair. Integrate sidewalks and the pedestrian trails network in the Recreation and Open Space Element.
Implementation CE 3-2.a Explore a program to fund sidewalk improvement or installation where no sidewalks exist, including sharing of costs with property owners, loans payable at time of sale, etc.
Implementation CE 3-2.b Identify major pedestrian routes and, where they adjoin streets, prepare roadway sections that encourage pedestrian use including intersection crossings, mid-block pedestrian crossings and upgrading pedestrian facilities to current ADA requirements.
Implementation CE 3-2.c Repair or install sidewalks or pedestrian paths on all streets in conjunction with public works and private development projects. 157
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-23
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Where roadway modifications are proposed and the City owns an existing right-of-way that exceeds the required roadway width, the City shall use the excess width to create bikeways, pedestrian paths, and streetscape features. Require new street connections to implement planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities as outlined in the General Plan and other transportation planning policy documents.
Implementation CE 3-2.d Where possible, use traditional sidewalk design on both sides of streets with a planter strip between the curb and sidewalk and low-impact development features.
Policy CE 3-3 Provide trees or other shade sources along pedestrian routes. Where street widening would remove substantial shade trees, investigate alternative roadway configurations that would preserve the shade trees.
Goal CE 4 Promote transit service and use, as shown in Exhibit 3.3 of the Circulation Element Update, to serve Cloverdale land use goals.
Policy CE 4-1 Participate in efforts to establish passenger rail service on the SMART right-of-way.
Implementation CE 4-1.a Encourage passage of rail bonds and develop appropriate land uses that will support rail ridership. (See Policy CDO 3-8 of the Conservation, Design, and Open Space Element).
Implementation CE 4-1.b Develop designs for Citrus Fair Drive and Asti Road (south interchange to First Street) to serve as attractive access routes to the SMART station. Elements shall include traffic calming, shaded pedestrian walkways, protected bicycle lanes, and small convenience commercial spaces near the station.
Policy CE 4-2 Develop a Plan around the Cloverdale SMART station to coordinate pedestrian access with the downtown, provide a source of transit riders within a half-mile radius of the station, and establish destination uses to attract transit riders to Cloverdale.
Implementation CE 4-2.a Monitor and update Station Area Precise Plan prior to development of major properties within a half mile of the Cloverdale SMART passenger rail station.
Policy CE 4-3 Support bus service locally, countywide, and beyond county borders.
Implementation CE 4-3.a Encourage use of the Cloverdale Shuttle (Sonoma County Transit 68) by maintaining schedules that serve the community and by considering the use of distinctive vehicles to bring visibility to the service. 158
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-24
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Policy CE 4-4 Encourage ride sharing to reduce commute trips.
Goal CE 5 To Reduce Automobile Dependency and Associated Impacts. State law requires that the City consider Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) in any CEQA analysis. Because the General Plan is the City’s blueprint for future development, incorporating strategies that reduce VMT within the General Plan will support compliance with CEQA. Trip reduction strategies will also help reduce traffic congestion, energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, which support overall community health.
Policy CE 5-1 Encourage and support the SCTA in establishing a Regional VMT Mitigation Bank and/or regional VMT impact fee program that can be used to fund effective VMT reduction strategies at a regional level, while also establishing a mechanism for private development to offset their VMT impacts.
Implementation CE 5-1.a Coordinate with regional VMT efforts.
Policy CE 5-2 As part of CEQA project review require new development projects to achieve a reduction in vehicle miles traveled compared to baseline conditions. Support SCTA’s efforts in maintaining the regional travel demand model, which will be used to adjust baseline VMT levels over time and allow the City to establish updated VMT benchmarks for project applicants.
Policy CE 5-3 Coordinate with property owners, employers in existing and developing employment centers and the Cloverdale Chamber of Commerce to implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies.
Implementation CE 5-3.a Coordinate with local employers, property owners and Chamber of Commerce to establish TDM strategies.
Policy CE 5-4 Encourage and support car or bike share programs within Cloverdale through partnership with car sharing or bike sharing entities and create pick up and drop off locations throughout the City, including employment and shopping areas, park-and-ride lots and neighborhood parks.
Implementation CE 5-4.a Coordinate with car and bike share vendors.
Policy CE 5-5 Encourage and support shuttle, alternative transportation options, or on demand transit service to create connections between existing transit services and to provide “last mile” solutions for transit users.
Implementation CE 5-5.a Coordinate with regional and county transit providers. 159
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-25
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Goal CE 6 Enhance and improve the safety of all users of the transportation system. At the core of the California Complete Streets Act is the concept of safety. To ensure that people are willing to travel by means other than the automobile, it is critical to support and facilitate a safe and comfortable environment for all users.
Policy CE 6-1 Regularly review multi modal collision and traffic speed data as part of a systemic process to determine the location of high injury collisions involving pedestrians and bicyclists, which impact the public’s perception of safety along the multimodal transportation network.
Implementation CE 6-1.a Collaborate with SCTA in their Vision Zero efforts to eliminate traffic fatalities and severe injuries. Vision Zero is a strategy to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries while also increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all.
Implementation CE 6-1.b Collaborate with Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition (SCBC) in creating and implementing the Sonoma County Safe Routes to Schools Program.
Safe Routes to School (SRTS) is an approach that promotes walking and bicycling to school safely through a combination of infrastructure improvements, traffic enforcement, safety education, and incentives.
SRTS initiatives aim to improve safety and increase levels of physical activity.
Implementation CE 6-1.c The City shall implement lighting, signage, and traffic calming improvements.
Policy CE 6-2 Bicycle and pedestrian education and outreach.
Implementation CE 6-2.a Work with organizations, with the appropriate expertise, to develop educational and outreach materials and programs for cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers that promote safe bicycling and walking, particularly for children.
Policy CE 6-3 Bicycle and pedestrian network comfort considerations.
Implementation CE 6-3.a Maintain a backbone bicycle and pedestrian network that seeks to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian users of all comfort levels (i.e., low level of traffic stress). Bicycle level of traffic stress assesses the perceived comfort of a bicyclist on a bike path shared with cars. For some bicyclists, sharing the road with automobiles is uncomfortable and they do not feel safe. As a result, they may choose to drive over bicycling if there is no safer or more comfortable alternative.
Policy CE 6-4 Local Roadway Safety Plan.
160
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-26
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Implementation CE 6-4.a Adopt a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) to promote multimodal safety and to allow the City to better compete for safety-related grant funding programs such as the Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).
Policy CE 6-5 Evaluate potential evacuation routes.
Implementation CE 6-4.a Evaluate potential evacuation routes to be compliant with State law and legislation in addition to the established US-101 and State Route 128. (See Goal PS 3 and Policy PS 6-1 of the Public Health and Safety Element) related to Multi Hazard Emergency Plan.
Goal CE 7 To provide a citywide comprehensive parking system that is integrated with alternate modes of transportation options to efficiently serve the needs of residents, visitors, and businesses.
Policy CE 7-1 Re-evaluate its minimum parking standards and seek to “right-size” parking to meet demand by taking into account shared mobility and micro-mobility trends and available alternative modes of transportation.
Implementation CE 7-1.a Keep apprised of ongoing technological advancements.
Policy CE 7-2 Encourage park-and-ride activity, shared parking facilities and shared public parking.
Implementation CE 7-2.a Collaborate with downtown businesses and SMART in creating and implementing parking options. The adopted Downtown Plan (See Policy CDO 3-2 of the Conservation, Design, and Open Space Element) includes a more walkable and bikeable City core, which also takes advantage of the proximity to the SMART passenger rail station.
Implementation CE 7-2.b Develop variable parking standards that reflect the level of parking demand based on land use, proximity to transit, and VMT reduction goals.
Policy CE 7-3 Encourage new residential developments in higher density areas to separate the cost of parking from the cost of renting or purchasing living space (i.e., unbundling).
Implementation CE 7-3.a Collaborate with the development community and Community Development in evaluating unbundled parking strategy.
Policy CE 7-4 Support the safe use of shared mobility and micro-mobility options (e.g., bike share, scooters) to connect residences, businesses to key destinations in the City, including SMART station and other public transit nodes and assess the integration of autonomous vehicles into the transportation system.
161
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-27
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Implementation CE 7-4.a Keep apprised of ongoing technological advancements.
Policy CE 7-5 Develop and leverage curb space management techniques in central Cloverdale in proximity to the SMART station to balance pick-up and drop-off activities with business related loading and unloading zones and monitor on- and off-street parking and loading areas to promote desired curb space usage.
Implementation CE 7-5.a Collaborate with downtown businesses and SMART in creating and implementing curb space management techniques.
Goal CE 8 To promote the safe and efficient movement of goods through the City to support business and commercial activity.
Policy CE 8-1 Truck delivery routes.
Implementation CE 8-1.a The City shall work with local businesses to identify preferred truck delivery routes to access key destinations in the City but also discourage trucks from using local streets. Regularly review and establish designated truck routes in the City to minimize noise impacts on residential areas. (See Policy CE 1-1).
Policy CE 8-2 Promote the safe and efficient movement of goods by rail through the City to support business and commercial activity. The rail line that runs through Cloverdale has historically been used for freight service and SMART passenger service is planned in the future.
Implementation CE 8-2.a The City shall engage with SMART to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of goods by rail through the City, including decreasing train speeds through the City.
Implementation CE 8-2.b The City shall establish and monitor the effectiveness of railroad quiet zones and make appropriate modifications to minimize noise and promote public safety. (See Goal NE 1 of the Noise Element).
Policy CE 8-3 Promote safe and efficient airport operations through the City to serve the growing population. (See Goal PS 7 of the Public Health and Safety Element).
Implementation CE 8-3.a The Cloverdale Municipal Airport, owned and operated by the City of Cloverdale, serves as a general aviation hub for the area. The City shall collaborate with the County and Sonoma County Airport Land Use Commission and reference the Cloverdale Municipal Airport Master Plan 2025, adopted in 2008, as the guiding plan for airport improvements and land use regulations.
162
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-28
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx City of Cloverdale Municipal Code
Title 10: Vehicles and Traffic
The Vehicles and Traffic Code contains regulations for design, operation, and enforcement of the local roadway network and users of the network. This code covers traffic control devices, traffic enforcement, traffic rules, pedestrian regulations, truck routes, parking design and enforcement, and speed limits.
3.1.4 - Methodology
Impacts related to transportation resulting from the implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update are discussed below. The impact analysis is based on a review of published information and reports regarding local and regional transportation trends and changes.
The proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific site development, and future development within the City would be required to comply with the policies of the General Plan and the proposed Circulation Element Update, as well as applicable federal, State, and local regulations. Where existing regulatory requirements or permitting requirements that are law and binding on responsible agencies and project applicants exist, it is reasonable to assume that they would be implemented, thereby reducing impacts.
3.1.5 - Thresholds of Significance
The lead agency utilizes the criteria in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Environmental Checklist to determine whether transportation and traffic impacts are significant environmental effects. Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy of the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
3.1.6 - Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
This section discusses potential impacts associated with the proposed Circulation Element Update and provides mitigation measures where necessary.
Conflict with Circulation Policy or Ordinance
Impact TRANS-1: The proposed Circulation Element Update would not conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy of the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
163
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-29
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Impact Analysis
The proposed Circulation Element Update has been developed within the framework provided by several State and regional plans and regulations, including the Bay Area region’s RTP, Plan Bay Area 2050. Plan Bay Area 2050 includes 35 strategies for housing, transportation, economic vitality, and the environment. The transportation strategies in Plan Bay Area 2050 fall into three categories: (1) Maintain and optimize the existing system, (2) Create healthy and safe streets, and (3) Build a nextgeneration transit system. As detailed below, the proposed Circulation Element Update would optimize the existing system by establishing LOS and VMT thresholds; providing for repairs of existing streets, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities; and collaborating with regional and County transit providers.
The proposed Circulation Element Update would focus on providing safe streets and facilities for all modes of transportation and encouraging the use and expansion of public transportation services.
Furthermore, the proposed Circulation Element Update would strengthen the City’s existing policies, including those related to transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.
Roadway
The proposed Circulation Element Update would strengthen the City’s existing policies addressing roadways through consistency with the Complete Streets Act. The proposed Circulation Element Update also seeks to reduce roadway emissions and minimize traffic congestion.
Under the Complete Streets Act, general plans of California cities are required to include planning for complete streets—that is, streets that meet the needs of all users of the roadway, including pedestrians, bicyclists, users of public transit, motorists, children, the elderly, and the disabled.
The proposed Circulation Element Update contains a number of policies and implementation actions that contribute toward the provision of a circulation network that is consistent with the Complete Streets Act. Proposed Policy CE 1-1 requires the development and maintenance of the network of freeways, arterials, collectors, and local streets with adequate capacity and safety to address complete streets. Implementation CE 1-1.a, CE 1-1.b, CE 1-1.c, CE 1-1.d, and CE1-1.e would also require the City to design, upgrade, and maintain the circulation system according to the functions the streets and facilities are intended to serve, update designs to align with new standards, provide funding to repair streets that are in poor condition, and establish designated truck routes. Proposed Policy CE 1-2 would require the City to plan street alignments, right-of-way, and building setbacks to handle anticipated growth and improvements. Implementation CE 1-2.b would require new development and expansions of existing development to provide necessary street improvements for the demand of all transportation modes, and proposed Policy CE 1-3 would require the design of street systems in residential areas to minimize through traffic and minimize vehicular conflicts at intersections.
Because the proposed Circulation Element Update has been created to be consistent with and implement applicable regulations regarding roadways (such as the Complete Streets Act, Plan Bay Area 2050, Sonoma County CTP, etc.), there would be no conflict between the proposed Circulation Element Update and existing programs, plans, ordinances, and policies addressing roadways. Future development in the City would be required to comply with the proposed Circulation Element Update. Therefore, there would be no impacts.
164
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-30
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
The proposed Circulation Element Update would continue and strengthen existing programs, plans, ordinances, and policies to support bicycle and pedestrian facilities. These include the prioritization of multimodal systems, maintenance of a network of complete streets to provide safe mobility access for all users, implementation of additional complete streets improvements as appropriate for the communities in which they are proposed, development and maintenance of local and regional bicycle networks, and promotion of bicycle safety when infrastructure improvements are made in accordance with the objectives of Plan Bay Area 2050, the Complete Streets Act, and the Caltrans District 4 Bike and Pedestrian Plans.
The proposed Circulation Element Update includes a range of policies and programs to ensure that bicycle and pedestrian facilities are maintained, improved, and expanded. For example, proposed Implementation CE 1-1.a would require the City to design, construct, upgrade, and maintain the bicycle and pedestrian circulation system according to the functions they are intended to serve.
Implementation CE 1-1d would require the provision of funding to repair bicycle facilities and sidewalks that are deteriorated or in poor repair, and Policy CE 1-2 would require the City to plan and reserve the street alignments, right-of-way, and building setbacks necessary to handle anticipated growth, bicycle, and pedestrian requirements. Policy CE 1-3 would require the street systems in residential areas to encourage internal movement by bicycling and walking. Implementations CE 3-
1.a, CE 3-1.b, and CE 3-1.c would further require the City to implement programs for bicycle and pedestrian trails in the Parks and Recreation Element of the adopted General Plan, maintain an upto-date bikeways plan, and integrate bicycle and pedestrian routes with transit stops.
Additionally, Goal CE 3, Policies CE 3-1 and CE 3-2, and Implementations CE 3-1.a, CE 3-1.b, CE 3-1.c, CE 3-2.a, CE 3-2.b, CE 3-2.c, and CE 3-2.d would require all streets to be designed as complete streets, which integrate walking, biking, transit uses, green infrastructure, and natural features.
These policies would require the maintenance of an up-to-date bikeways plan and the identification of major pedestrian routes within the City. Thus, the proposed Circulation Element Update would promote increased use by pedestrians and bicyclists of all ages and abilities without a degradation of safety or access for public transit users or motorists, ensuring consistency with the Complete Streets Act.
Future development would be required to comply with the proposed Circulation Element Update.
Because the proposed Circulation Element Update has been created to be consistent with and implement applicable regulations regarding roadways (such as the Complete Streets Act, Plan Bay Area 2050, SCTA CTP, etc.), the proposed Circulation Element Update would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy related to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. There would be no impacts.
Transit Facilities
Consistent with the Complete Streets Act, Plan Bay Area 2050, and the SCTA CTP, the proposed Circulation Element Update contains objectives, policies, and programs that would promote the use of public transit and improve public transit service for existing and future populations through the City’s own initiations and through cooperation with the public transit providers who serve the City. 165
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-31
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx The proposed Circulation Element Update includes a range of policies and programs to promote transit service and use. Proposed Goal CE 4 aims to promote transit service and use within the City to serve the land use goals. Proposed Policies CE 4-1 and CE 4-2, as well as Implementation CE 4-1.a, CE 4-1.b, and CE 4-2.a, are included in the proposed Circulation Element Update to encourage efforts to establish passenger rail service through SMART, encourage land uses that support rail ridership, and develop designs and plans to coordinate access to the SMART station. Proposed Policy CE 4-3 and Implementation CE 4-3.a would encourage the use of the Cloverdale Shuttle by maintaining schedules to serve the community and bringing visibility to the service. Proposed Policy CE 5-5 and Implementation CE 5-5.a would encourage shuttle, alternative transportation options, and ondemand transit services to create connections between existing transit services through coordination with regional and county transit providers. Because the proposed Circulation Element Update has been created to be consistent with and implement applicable regulations regarding roadways (such as the Complete Streets Act, Plan Bay Area 2050, Sonoma County CTP, etc.), the proposed Circulation Element Update would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy related to public transit facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.
Level of Significance Before Mitigation
Less than significant impact.
Mitigation Measures
None required.
Conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, Subdivision (b) Impact TRANS-2: The proposed Circulation Element Update would conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b).
Impact Analysis
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 requires an analysis of transportation impacts based on VMT. The following analysis considers the VMT impacts of the implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update as part of General Plan buildout for operation.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b), gives local agencies discretion to select the most appropriate methodologies and significance thresholds for evaluating VMT.
The City has not adopted citywide numeric significance thresholds for operational VMT. Therefore, for purposes of evaluating this project, this analysis is based on OPR guidance, which recommends setting VMT thresholds generally at 15 percent below baseline VMT per capita.
To provide a quantitative VMT evaluation, the City used the SCTM to estimate the VMT generated by land uses under existing conditions and at General Plan buildout. Based on SCTM, existing and projected future VMT for the City is shown in Table 3.1-3. 166
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-32
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Table 3.1-3: Existing and Projected Future VMT
Category 2019 Base Year 2024 Baseline1
Year 2040 General
Plan Buildout
Percent Change
(2040 General Plan
Buildout vs. 2024
Baseline)
Total City Generated VMT2 415,451 434,314 494,677 +13.90% Total City VMT per Service
Population3
28.8 28.0 25.4 -9.25%
Home-Based VMT per
Resident4
16.0 15.1 12.2 -19.18%
Home-Based VMT per
Employee5
9.5 9.1 7.9 -13.37%
Notes:
VMT = Vehicle Miles Traveled
1 2024 baseline data was interpolated from 2019 Base Year Data from the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA).
2 Total City Generated VMT = All VMT from trips with a start or end in Cloverdale 3 City VMT per Service Population = Total City Generated VMT divided by the number of residents plus employees 4 Home-based VMT per Resident = All VMT from trips with a start or end at a residence in Cloverdale, divided by the number of residents.
5Home-based Work VMT per Employee = All VMT from “commute” trips between home and work (or work and home), divided by the number of employees.
Source: Fehr & Peers. 2024.
Also shown in Table 3.1-3, partial VMT data was developed for vehicle trips generated by housing (Home-based VMT per Resident) and employment (Home-based VMT per Employee) uses and are also evaluated against the 15 percent VMT reduction threshold. However, for the purposes of this analysis, VMT per service population is used as the primary metric because it considers both employee and residential VMT and thereby provides a more complete VMT calculation. Home-based VMT per Resident and Employee data is provided herein for informational purposes only.
As shown in Table 3.1-3, the SCTM projects that the General Plan buildout scenario will result in an approximately 9.25 percent decrease in VMT per service population. This would not meet the applicable threshold of significance requiring a 15 percent reduction in VMT per capita as compared to existing conditions.
In summary, while the proposed Circulation Element Update would contribute to a reduced total VMT per service population within the City upon General Plan buildout, it would not result in a decrease that meets or exceeds the 15 percent VMT reduction threshold. This would be a potentially significant impact.
Future VMT Screening and Analysis
Policy CE 5-2 of the proposed Circulation Element Update would require new development projects to achieve a reduction in VMT compared to baseline conditions. Consistent with this policy, all future individual development projects would be required to comply with MM TRANS-2a. MM TRANS-2a 167
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-33
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx requires that, when the City receives an application for a project subject to CEQA, it shall apply the “Screening Thresholds for Land Use Projects” set forth in the OPR Technical Advisory for Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. If the project would exceed the screening thresholds, or other evidence demonstrates a potentially significant VMT impact, the City shall require the applicant to prepare a quantitative, project-level VMT analysis.
As shown in Table 3.1-3, the proposed Circulation Element Update would result in a reduction in VMT per service population of 9.25 percent. In order to achieve 15 percent below baseline total VMT per service population, an additional 6.3 percent reduction would be required for projects that are consistent with the General Plan.9For projects consistent with the General Plan that do not meet the applicable numeric threshold of significance (a 6.3 percent reduction in VMT) as indicated in the project-level VMT analysis prepared in accordance with MM TRANS-2a, MM TRANS-2b and/or MM TRANS-2c would also apply.
Transportation Demand Management
MM TRANS-2b requires reductions of operational VMT impacts to the greatest extent feasible via a TDM Program that includes various trip reduction strategies.
TDM strategies are project site and building tenant dependent and are too speculative to analyze in a planning level document such as this. There are a multitude of TDM measures to reduce VMT. The Sonoma County Vehicle Miles Traveled Mitigation and Reduction Calculator (VMT Tool) was developed by SCTA and Sonoma County jurisdictions in order to assist member agencies in their efforts to reduce VMT. It can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation measures on the transportation effects of land use projects. The VMT Tool includes all allowable TDM measures and their relative effectiveness. Based on the percentage of participation selected by the user, the VMT Tool calculates the resulting VMT reduction. The various TDM measures in the VMT Tool include school carpool programs, bike sharing programs, car sharing programs, trip reduction marketing/educational campaigns, parking cash-out, subsidized transit, telecommuting, alternative work schedules, shuttles, pay to park, ride sharing, unbundled parking, and subsidized vanpools.
Nonetheless, the effectiveness of the TDM reduction measures for future individual development projects would be too speculative to quantify at this time.
As the above TDM strategies are heavily dependent on context, a matrix detailing which TDM strategies may be most effective when taking into account local contexts, called Site Groups, has been included as Table 3.1-4. The seven areas are shown in Exhibit 3.1-4. 9 The baseline VMT for the year 2024 is 28.0. The proposed Circulation Element Update would result in a VMT per service population of 25.4, which is 9.25 percent. A 15 percent reduction would result in a VMT per Service population of 23.8. 25.4 VMT minus 23.8 VMT is equal to 1.6 VMT. 1.6 VMT is equal to 6.3 percent of 25.4. As such, an additional 6.3 percent of VMT reduction is needed to reduce impacts to a less than significant level for projects consistent with the General Plan. 168
169
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-35
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Exhibit 3.1-4: Potential Site Groups
170
171
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-37
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Table 3.1-4: Potential Effectiveness of TDM Strategies by Site Group TDM Strategy Effectiveness
Site Group
1-TOD
Station
Area
2-Downtown
Neighborhood
Transition
Areas
3-South
Cloverdale
Boulevard
Area
4-Northwest
Residential
Area
5-Industrial
Area
6-
Commercial/
Office/
Service
Areas
7-Alexander
Valley
Resort
Specific Plan
Area
Provision of bus stop
improvements or onsite mobility hubs
H H M M M H M
Pedestrian
improvements, onsite or off-site, to
connect to nearby
transit stops,
services, schools,
shops, etc.
H H M M M H M
Bicycle programs
including bike
purchase incentives,
storage,
maintenance
programs, and onsite education
program
H H M M M M M
Enhancements to
countywide bicycle
network
H M M M M M M
Parking reductions
and/or fees set at
levels sufficient to
incentivize transit,
active
transportation, or
shared modes
H H M L L M M
Cash allowances,
passes, or other
public transit
subsidies and
purchase incentives
H H M M L M M
Enhancements to
bus service
H H H M M H M
Implementation of
shuttle service
H M M L L M M
Establishment of
carpool, bus pool, or
vanpool programs
M M M L L M M
172
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-38
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx TDM Strategy Effectiveness
Vanpool purchase
incentives
L L L L L L L
Low emission vehicle
purchase
incentives/subsidies
H H H H H H H
Compliance with a
future County
VMT/TDM ordinance
H H H M M H H
Participation in a
future County VMT
fee program
H H H M M H H
Participate in future
VMT exchange or
mitigation bank
programs
H H H M M H H
Notes:
Potential effectiveness ratings:
L = low,
M = medium,
H = high
Based on California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) research, global maximum Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) reduction using all Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures for projects in rural and suburban contexts is 5-10 percent
potential effectiveness of strategies based on Potential Site Group density, access to transit, and nearby destinations within walking or bicycling distance.
Source: Fehr & Peers. May 2024
VMT Mitigation Bank and/or Impact Fee Contribution
MM TRANS-2c allows for projects that do not achieve an additional 6.3 percent VMT reduction per MM TRANS-2b to participate in a Regional VMT Mitigation Bank and/or Regional VMT Impact Fee Program. This is consistent with Policy CE 5-1 in the proposed Circulation Element Update, which would require the City to encourage and support the SCTA in establishing a Regional VMT Mitigation Bank and/or regional VMT impact fee program that can be used to fund effective VMT reduction strategies at a regional level and establishing a mechanism for private development to offset their VMT impacts. As of the time of this Draft Subsequent EIR, SCTA is collecting proposals to prepare a Community Based Transportation Plan for areas in Sonoma County, including the City of Cloverdale, which would include a regional VMT impact fee program. As such, for projects that do not achieve an additional 6.3 percent reduction in VMT, MM TRANS-2c would allow future individual development projects to participate in the Regional VMT Mitigation Bank and/or regional VMT impact fee program when it is implemented in lieu of or in combination with MM TRANS-2b. However, because this program has not yet been established, it would not ensure impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level.
173
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-39
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Conclusion
Because it would be too speculative to quantify impacts of project-level TDM plans for future individual development projects and the VMT Mitigation Bank/impact fee program has not yet been established, future VMT reduction cannot be confirmed at this time. As such, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable with mitigation incorporated.
Level of Significance Before Mitigation
Potentially significant impact.
Mitigation Measures
MM TRANS-2a When the City of Cloverdale (City) receives an application for a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), it shall apply the “Screening Thresholds for Land Use Projects” set forth in the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory for Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. If the project would exceed the screening thresholds, or other evidence demonstrates a potentially significant Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) impact, the City shall require the applicant to prepare a quantitative, project-level VMT analysis.
MM TRANS-2b For projects consistent with the General Plan, if the project-level Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis, prepared as a result of MM TRANS-2a, shows that the project would not meet or exceed the applicable numeric threshold of significance (a reduction of 6.3 percent VMT per service population), the City shall require the applicant to prepare and implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program.
Prior to issuance of building permits, project applicants shall develop a TDM Program for proposed projects, including any anticipated phasing, and shall submit the TDM Program to the City of Cloverdale for review and approval. The TDM Program shall identify trip reduction strategies as well as mechanisms for funding and overseeing the delivery of trip reduction programs and strategies. The TDM Program shall be incorporated into and implemented as part of the project. Trip reduction strategies may include, but are not limited to, the following:
Provision of bus stop improvements or on-site mobility hubs Provision of bus stop improvements or on-site mobility hubs Pedestrian improvements, on-site or off-site, to connect to nearby transit stops, services, schools, shops, etc.
Bicycle programs including bike purchase incentives, storage, maintenance programs, and on-site education program
Enhancements to citywide bicycle network
Parking reductions and/or fees set at levels sufficient to incentivize transit, active transportation, or shared modes
Cash allowances, passes, or other public transit subsidies and purchase incentives Enhancements to bus service
174
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-40
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Implementation of shuttle service
Establishment of carpool, bus pool, or vanpool programs Vanpool purchase incentives
Low emission vehicle purchase incentives/subsidies
Compliance with a future County VMT/TDM ordinance
Participation in a future County VMT impact fee program Participate in future VMT exchange or mitigation bank programs As these TDM strategies are heavily dependent on context, a matrix, included as Table 3.1-4 of the Subsequent Draft EIR, details which TDM strategies may be most effective when taking into account local contexts, called Site Groups. The TDM Program shall illustrate that VMT impacts would be reduced by at least 6.3 percent VMT per service population.
MM TRANS-2c Upon implementation of a Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA) Regional Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation Bank and/or regional VMT impact fee program, future individual development projects that would not meet or exceed the applicable number threshold of significance (a reduction of 6.3 percent VMT per service population) for VMT would have the option to contribute VMT impact fees to SCTA in addition to or in place of Transportation Demand Management Program (TDM) strategies.
Level of Significance After Mitigation
Significant and unavoidable impact.
Hazards
Impact TRANS-3: The proposed Circulation Element Update would not substantially increase design hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment).
Impact Analysis
The proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific site development or physical environmental changes. As such, development within the City would continue to occur in accordance with the adopted General Plan including the policies of the proposed Circulation Element Update. The proposed Circulation Element Update would retain the existing roadway patterns and does not propose any new major roadways or other physical features that would substantially increase hazards and incompatible uses. Proposed development, land use activities, and roadway network improvements that occur pursuant to the General Plan would be reviewed for compliance with State and local requirements that reduce design hazards, as relevant (e.g., site distance). As such, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not substantially increase hazards due to geometric design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment), and there would be no impacts. 175
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-41
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Level of Significance Before Mitigation
No impact.
Mitigation Measures
None required.
Emergency Access
Impact TRANS-4: The proposed Circulation Element Update would not result in inadequate emergency access.
Impact Analysis
The proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific site development or physical environmental changes. As such, the development within the City would continue to occur in accordance with the adopted General Plan and would require compliance with the policies of the proposed Circulation Element Update.
The proposed Circulation Element Update includes policies and implementation actions to ensure that adequate emergency access is provided and maintained during future development. Policy CE 6- 5 would require the City to evaluate potential evacuation routes, and Implementation CE 6-5.a would require the City to ensure potential evacuation routes (beyond the established US-101 and SR-128 route) are compliant with State law and legislation. Furthermore, the adopted General Plan includes policies related to emergency access and evacuation, such as Policy PS 5-3, which ensures roadways are adequate in terms of width, radius, and grade to facilitate emergency access.
In conclusion, the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose any changes to land use patterns or the roadway network such that potential impairments to emergency access would be created (road closures, road narrowing, new roadways with steep grades, etc.). Future development and land use activities within the City would be reviewed for compliance with State and local requirements for emergency access by the City. As such, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not result in inadequate emergency access. There would be no impacts.
Level of Significance Before Mitigation
No impact.
Mitigation Measures
None required.
3.1.7 - Cumulative Impacts
This analysis evaluates whether the impacts of the proposed Circulation Element Update, together with the impacts of cumulative development, could result in a cumulatively significant impact with respect to transportation. This analysis then considers where the incremental contribution of the impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update would be significant. Both conditions must apply in order for a project’s cumulative effects to rise to the level of a significant impact.
176
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-42
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Except where noted, the geographic context for this analysis includes the City’s Planning Area and the surrounding unincorporated areas within Sonoma County. Past, present, and future development projects contribute to transportation impacts. If there is a cumulative impact, and if the project is determined to have a significant transportation impact, it is concluded that the proposed Circulation Element Update’s incremental contribution to the cumulative impact is cumulatively considerable.
Compliance with Policies, Plans, and Ordinances
Past, present, and reasonably foreseeable regional growth within the City and unincorporated Sonoma County would result in increased traffic volumes on area roadways, VMT, and demand for transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. All cumulative projects would be reviewed by the City and/or County to determine compliance with regional and local ordinances, General Plan policies, and proposed Circulation Element Update policies that address potential impacts related to transportation. Any approved development would have to be consistent with the General Plan, Municipal Code, and Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, it is assumed that all projects would comply with regulations required in regional and local ordinances and policies or be mitigated to demonstrate compliance. Accordingly, cumulative impacts related to compliance with policies, plans and ordinances would be less than significant. Moreover, the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose any changes to land use patterns or the roadway network. For these reasons, the proposed Circulation Element Update’s incremental contribution to the less than significant cumulative impacts with respect to compliance with program plan, ordinance, or policy of the circulation system would not be cumulatively considerable.
Cumulative VMT Impacts
The proposed Circulation Element Update’s incremental contribution to cumulative traffic impacts would be significant and unavoidable. OPR guidance recommends setting VMT thresholds generally at 15 percent below baseline VMT per capita. Past, present, and reasonably forseeable development in the geographic area would exceed 15 percent. As shown in Table 3.1-3, the SCTM projects that the General Plan buildout scenario will result in an approximately 9.25 percent decrease in VMT per service population. This would not meet the applicable threshold of significance requiring a 15 percent reduction in VMT per capita as compared to existing conditions. Therefore, there is a cumulative impact.
The proposed Circulation Element Update would have a cumulatively considerable contribution to the cumulative impact even with implementation of MM TRANS-2a, MM TRANS-2b, and MMTRANS2c that require procedures for future individual development projects as well as mitigation measures for future projects consistent with the General Plan. Therefore, development associated with the General Plan would result in a significant and unavoidable VMT impact and the proposed Circulation Element Update’s incremental contribution to the cumulative impact is significant. Accordingly, development consistent with the proposed Circulation Element Update would have a cumulatively considerable contribution to cumulative VMT impacts even with implementation of identified mitigation measures, resulting in a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact related to VMT. 177
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Transportation and Traffic FirstCarbon Solutions 3.1-43
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec03-01 Transportation.docx Design Hazards and Emergency Access
The geographic scope for design hazards and emergency access is limited to the City’s Planning Area.
Past, present, and reasonably foreseeable development is submitted to police and fire for review and approval to ensure adequate emergency access. Accordingly, cumulative impacts are less than significant. Moreover, the proposed Circulation Element Update’s incremental contribution to the less than significant impact would not be cumulatively considerable. As discussed under Impact TRANS-3, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not substantially increase design hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses, and, as discussed under Impact TRANS-4, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not result in inadequate emergency access.
Therefore, impacts of the proposed Circulation Element Update’s contribution to cumulative design hazards and emergency access impacts would be less than significant.
Level of Cumulative Significance Before Mitigation
Potentially significant impact.
Mitigation Measures
Implement MM TRANS-2a and MM TRANS-2b.
Level of Cumulative Significance After Mitigation
Significant and unavoidable impact.
178
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Effects Found not to be Significant FirstCarbon Solutions 4-1
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec04-00 EFNTBS.docx CHAPTER 4: EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT
4.1 - Introduction
This chapter is based on the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (Draft Subsequent EIR) Notice of Preparation (NOP), dated January 31, 2024, and contained in Appendix A of this Draft Subsequent EIR. The NOP was prepared to identify the potentially significant effects of the proposed General Plan Circulation Element Update Project (Circulation Element Update) and was circulated for public review between January 31, 2024, and March 1, 2024. In the course of the NOP evaluation, certain impacts were found to be less than significant because implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update would not result in such impacts. This chapter provides a brief description of effects found not to be significant or less than significant based on the NOP, NOP public comments received, or more detailed analysis conducted as part of the Draft Subsequent EIR preparation process. Note that Transportation and Traffic impacts that are found to be less than significant are addressed in Section 3.1 of this Draft Subsequent EIR to provide more comprehensive discussion of why impacts are less than significant and to better inform decision-makers and the general public.
4.2 - Environmental Effects Found not to be Significant
4.2.1 - Aesthetics, Light, and Glare
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy changes and does not propose any specific development or physical environmental changes. Therefore, it does not have the potential to result in a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista or a scenic highway, degrade existing visual character or quality of a specific project site, or create new sources of light and glare. Therefore, no impact would occur and these topics will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.2 - Agriculture Resources and Forestry Resources
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy changes and does not propose any specific development or physical environmental changes. Therefore, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance; conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use; impact any site subject to a Williamson Act Contract; result in a conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use; result in the loss of forest land; convert forest land to non-forest use; or impact farmland or land designated as forest land.
Therefore, the proposed Circulation Element Update would have no impact on farmland or forest land and these topics will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.3 - Air Quality
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy changes and does not propose any specific development or physical environmental changes. The purpose of these policies is to improve circulation throughout the City as well as reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), which would have at least a minimal reduction in mobile source emissions. These conditions preclude the possibility of impacts on air quality. Furthermore, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not include the 179
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Effects Found not to be Significant FirstCarbon Solutions 4-2
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec04-00 EFNTBS.docx development of odor-producing land uses and would not increase criteria pollutants or pollutant concentrations because no development would occur. Therefore, no impact would occur and these topics will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.4 - Biological Resources
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy updates and does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities.
This type of policy change would not have the potential to impact candidate, sensitive, or specialstatus species, wetlands, wildlife corridors, or an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP)/Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP) since it would not result in site-specific physical changes.
Therefore, no impact would occur and these topics will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.5 - Cultural Resources
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy updates and does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. As such, this type of policy change would not have the potential to impact historical resources, archaeological resources, or human remains. Therefore, no impact would occur and these topics will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.6 - Energy
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy updates and does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities.
This type of policy change would not have the potential to result in environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources and would not have the potential to conflict with or obstruct a plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Therefore, no impact would occur and these topics will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.7 - Geology, Soils, and Seismicity
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy updates and does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities.
This type of policy change would not have the potential to result in physical changes that would be impacted by a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, or other geologic conditions, such as ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, soil erosion, or subsidence. Furthermore, there are no documented fault zones, liquefaction zones, or landslide zones located within the City.1 Therefore, no impact would occur and this topic will not be reviewed further in the Draft Subsequent EIR.
1 California Department of Conservation. 2021. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation. Website:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/. Accessed March 1, 2024. 180
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Effects Found not to be Significant FirstCarbon Solutions 4-3
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec04-00 EFNTBS.docx
4.2.8 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy changes and does not propose any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. The purpose of these policies is to improve circulation throughout the City and to reduce impacts related to VMT, which would have at least a minimal reduction in mobile source emissions. These conditions preclude the possibility of impacts on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Therefore, no impact would occur and this topic will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.9 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy updates and does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities.
Therefore, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not result in impacts related to the release of or exposure to a hazard or hazardous material due to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials; accidental release of hazardous materials; emitting or handling hazardous materials within 0.25 mile of a school; locating development within an airport land use plan or on sites listed on the Cortese List; impairing implementation of an emergency response plan; and/or exposure to risks involving wildland fires. Therefore, no impact would occur and this topic will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.10 - Hydrology and Water Quality
The proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. Therefore, this type of policy change does not have the potential to result in physical changes that would result in water quality impacts due to erosion or flooding or in groundwater or groundwater quality impacts. Therefore, no impact would occur and these topics will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.11 - Land Use
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy changes and does not propose any changes in land use or zoning designations, nor does it propose any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. These conditions preclude the possibility for impacts related to physically dividing an established community or causing a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted to avoid or mitigate environmental effects. Therefore, this topic will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.12 - Mineral Resources
The proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. Therefore, the proposed Circulation Element would not impact mineral resources that would be of value to the region or the residents of the State and this topic will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR. 181
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Effects Found not to be Significant FirstCarbon Solutions 4-4
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec04-00 EFNTBS.docx
4.2.13 - Noise
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy changes and does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities.
Implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update would not generate temporary or permanent increases in ambient noise level, generate excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels, or expose people residing or working in the City to excessive noise levels from public or private airstrips because no physical development would occur. Therefore, no impact would occur and these topics will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.14 - Population and Housing
The proposed Circulation Element Update is a policy-level document which does not propose new residential or business uses within the City. Implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update would not induce substantial population growth either directly or indirectly, involve the displacement of existing housing, or involve the displacement of substantial numbers of people, thereby necessitating the construction of replacement housing. Therefore, no impact would occur and this topic will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.15 - Public Services and Utilities
The proposed Circulation Element Update is a policy-level document and does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. As such, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have the potential to create the need for additional services for fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, and other public facilities, such as libraries. Therefore, no impact would occur and this topic will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.16 - Recreation
The proposed Circulation Element Update is a policy-level document and does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. As such, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not directly create a demand for recreation facilities, nor will it contribute to the deterioration of existing recreational facilities. No impact on existing recreational facilities is projected to occur. Therefore, this topic will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.17 - Tribal Cultural Resources
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy updates and does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. As such, this type of policy change would not have the potential to impact Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074, listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), or determined to be significant by the Lead Agency.
Therefore, no impact would occur and these topics will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
182
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Effects Found not to be Significant FirstCarbon Solutions 4-5
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec04-00 EFNTBS.docx
4.2.18 - Utilities and Service Systems
The proposed Circulation Element Update is a policy-level document and does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities.
Therefore, the proposed Circulation Element does not have the potential to result in physical changes or create new development that would result in the need for or impact existing utilities and service systems, such as water, wastewater, stormwater, telecommunications, or electricity facilities and/or providers. As such, no impact would occur and this topic will not be reviewed further in this Draft Subsequent EIR.
4.2.19 - Wildfire
The proposed Circulation Element Update is limited to policy updates and does not propose or entitle any specific development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities.
Therefore, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have the potential to substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan, exacerbate wildfire risks, expose residents to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire, or require the installation of infrastructure that would exacerbate fire risks. There would be no impacts and this topic will not be reviewed further in the Draft Subsequent EIR.
183
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Other CEQA Considerations FirstCarbon Solutions 5-1
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec05-00 Other CEQA.docx CHAPTER 5: OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15126 requires that all aspects of a project must be considered when evaluating its impact on the environment, including planning, acquisition, development, and operation. As part of this analysis, the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (Draft Subsequent EIR) must also identify: (1) significant environmental effects of the proposed Circulation Element Update; (2) significant environmental effects which cannot be avoided if the proposed Circulation Element Update would be implemented; (3) significant irreversible environmental changes which would be involved in the proposed Circulation Element Update should it be implemented; (4) growth-inducing impacts of the proposed Circulation Element Update; (5) mitigation measures proposed to minimize the significant effects; and (6) alternatives to the proposed Circulation Element Update.
This chapter provides a discussion of other CEQA-mandated topics, including significant unavoidable impacts, growth-inducing impacts, mandatory findings of significance, and significant irreversible environmental changes which would be involved in the proposed Circulation Element Update should it be implemented. Chapter 3, Environmental Impact Analysis, describes the significant environmental effects of the proposed Circulation Element Update and provides mitigation measures proposed to minimize significant effects. Chapter 6, Alternatives to the Proposed Project, discusses alternatives to the proposed Circulation Element Update.
5.1 - Significant Unavoidable Impacts
CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(a)(c) requires an EIR to identify and focus on the significant environmental effects of the proposed Circulation Element Update, including effects that cannot be avoided if the proposed Circulation Element Update should be implemented.
The proposed Circulation Element Update would result in the following significant unavoidable impacts:
Project-level Vehicle Miles Traveled: While the proposed Circulation Element Update would result in decreases for Home-based Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) per Resident, Home-based Work VMT per Employee, and VMT per Service Population, the expected VMT per Service Population would not fall below the 15 percent VMT reduction threshold. As such, Mitigation Measure (MM) TRANS-2a, TRANS-2b, and TRANS-2c would require future individual development projects that do not screen out from a VMT impact analysis to provide a quantitative VMT analysis. If results indicate that the VMT associated with the individual development project would be above the threshold, it would be required to mitigate to a less than significant level. Projects consistent with the General Plan would be required to implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program and/or a Regional VMT impact fee program (when it is available). Because the effectiveness of the TDM measures for future individual development projects cannot be quantified in this analysis and the VMT impact fee program is not yet in place, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable. 184
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Other CEQA Considerations FirstCarbon Solutions 5-2
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec05-00 Other CEQA.docx Cumulative Vehicle Miles Traveled: Cumulative projects in the City and County will generate new VMT, which would be added to the roadway network within the geographic context. All cumulative projects would be reviewed for compliance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations, including General Plan policies that address VMT, as well as mitigate their fair share of impacts related to VMT. Nonetheless, the proposed Circulation Element Update, in conjunction with other reasonably foreseeable past, present, and future projects, would have a cumulatively significant impact related to VMT. Development consistent with the General Plan and the proposed Circulation Element Update would result in a significant and unavoidable cumulatively considerable contribution to the existing cumulative VMT impact, creating a potentially significant impact. Even with the incorporation of MM TRANS-2a, MM TRANS-2b, and MM TRANS-2c, the City may not achieve the overall VMT threshold reduction level due to uncertainty in the cumulative effectiveness of the measures included in MM TRANS-2a MM TRANS-2b, and MM TRANS-2c as well as unknowns related to transit service levels, transportation technology, and travel behavior. Moreover, these policies and measures primarily apply to new developments; existing land uses that have already been approved and are under construction are generally not affected. Because of the programmatic nature of the proposed Circulation Element Update, no additional mitigation measures are available and the cumulative impact is considered significant and unavoidable.
5.2 - Growth-inducing Impacts
There are two types of growth-inducing impacts that a project may have: direct and indirect. To assess the potential for growth-inducing impacts, the project’s characteristics that may encourage and facilitate activities that individually or cumulatively may affect the environment must be evaluated (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.2(e)). CEQA Guidelines, as interpreted by the City, state that a significant growth-inducing impact may result if the project would:
Induce substantial population growth in an area (for example, by proposing new homes and commercial or industrial businesses beyond the land use density/intensity envisioned in the general plan);
Substantially alter the planned location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the population of an area; or
Include extensions of roads or other infrastructure not assumed in the general plan or adopted capital improvements project list, when such infrastructure exceeds the needs of the project and could accommodate future developments.
Direct growth-inducing impacts occur when the development of a project imposes new burdens on a community by directly inducing unplanned population growth or by leading to the construction of additional developments in the same area. Also included in this category are projects that remove physical obstacles to population growth (such as a new road into an undeveloped area or a wastewater treatment plant with excess capacity that could allow additional development in the service area). Construction of these types of infrastructure projects cannot be considered isolated from the developments they facilitate and serve. Projects that physically remove obstacles to 185
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Other CEQA Considerations FirstCarbon Solutions 5-3
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec05-00 Other CEQA.docx growth, or projects that indirectly induce growth, may provide a catalyst for future unrelated development in an area, such as a new residential community that requires additional commercial uses to support residents.
The City had 3,239 total housing units as if 2019 (the most recent available data). 1 The proposed
Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development that would directly increase growth. Additionally, the proposed Circulation Element Update does not anticipate any new housing units as a result of its implementation. Under the proposed Circulation Element Update, development and growth within the City would continue to occur according to the City’s adopted General Plan, which planned for up to 4,700 housing units and 12,000 residents in 2025.2 Therefore, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not result in direct population growth and no impacts would occur.
The City currently has 1,849 jobs and approximately 4,039 residents in the workforce.3 Because the proposed Circulation Element Update would not include specific development, such as new businesses or infrastructure, implementation of the proposed Circulation Element would not result in indirect population growth and no impacts would occur.
5.3 - Mandatory Findings of Significance
Public Resources Code Section 21083 requires lead agencies to make a finding of a “significant effect on the environment” if one or more of the following conditions exist:
1) A project has the potential to degrade the quality of environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife species to drop below selfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 2) The possible effects of a project are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. 3) The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
Finding No. 1: No impact.
The proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific site development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. Therefore, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, reduce fish and wildlife habitat, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of history or prehistory. 1 City of Cloverdale. 2023. City of Cloverdale Housing Element Update 2023-2031: Technical Background Report and Appendices.
September 26.
2 City of Cloverdale. 2009. General Plan. May 13. Amended January 28, 2015. 3 City of Cloverdale. 2023. City of Cloverdale Adopted Housing Element Update, 2023-2031. September 26. 186
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Other CEQA Considerations FirstCarbon Solutions 5-4
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec05-00 Other CEQA.docx Finding No. 2: Significant and unavoidable impact.
As discussed in Section 3.1, Transportation and Traffic, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would have less than significant cumulative impacts related to transportation and traffic, with the exception of project-level and cumulative VMT impacts. The proposed Circulation Element Update would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to VMT, both at the project level and cumulatively.
The proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific site development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. Accordingly, as discussed in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, no impacts were found related to Aesthetics, Agricultural and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services and Utilities, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire. Therefore, these aforementioned topical areas would have no cumulative impacts.
Finding No. 3: No impact.
The proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific site development, physical environmental changes, or ground-disturbing activities. Future development in the City would continue to occur in accordance with the City’s adopted General Plan and individual projects would undergo environmental review pursuant to CEQA and would implement applicable mitigation measures to reduce substantial adverse effects on human beings. Furthermore, the proposed Circulation Element Update would include new goals and policies related to VMT analysis and reductions considering the City’s Climate Emergency Declaration (Resolution Number 91-2019), thereby reducing impacts related to GHG emissions and corresponding indirect adverse impacts on human beings. Therefore, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have an adverse impact on human beings.
5.4 - Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes
As mandated by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(d), the Draft Subsequent EIR must address significant irreversible environmental changes which would be caused by the proposed Circulation Element Update should it be implemented. Specifically, such an irreversible change would occur if:
The proposed Circulation Element Update would involve a large commitment of nonrenewable resources;
Primary and secondary impacts would generally commit future generations to similar uses; The proposed Circulation Element Update involves uses in which irreversible damage could result from any potential environmental accidents associated with the proposed Circulation Element Update; or
The proposed consumption of resources is not justified (e.g., the proposed Circulation Element Update results in wasteful use of energy).
187
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Other CEQA Considerations FirstCarbon Solutions 5-5
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec05-00 Other CEQA.docx Under the proposed Circulation Element Update, development and growth within the City would continue to occur according to the City’s adopted General Plan. No site-specific development or physical environmental changes would occur. As such, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not include the consumption of resources that are not replenishable or which may renew so slowly to be considered nonrenewable. The proposed Circulation Element Update also encourages transit-oriented development consistent with the policies adopted within the General Plan to reduce impacts related to consumption of nonrenewable resources.
Implementation of the proposed Circulation Element Update would not result in an irreversible commitment of existing land uses to new land uses because no land use changes are proposed.
Therefore, future generations would not be committed to changes in land uses as a result of this project and no irreversible long-term environmental changes would occur related to land use.
The proposed Circulation Element Update includes goals and policies to reduce automobile dependency and reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, such as Goal CE 5, Policy CE 5-4, and Policy CE 5-5, which encourage alternative transportation and public transit services. Future development under the proposed Circulation Element Update would be required to comply with the City’s policies related to energy preservation and conservation, meeting State energy efficiency regulations that include Title 24 Part 6 building energy efficiency standards that require new residential uses to meet a net zero energy use standard, which is met through installation of rooftop solar photovoltaics (PV) systems, enhanced insulation, and energy-efficient appliances. Since development and growth within the City would continue to occur according to the City’s adopted General Plan, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not result in a wasteful use of energy or an unjustified consumption of resources.
In fact, the proposed Circulation Element Update would likely be beneficial in the conservation of energy and nonrenewable resources. The proposed goals and policies would reduce energy use through increasing vehicle efficiency and encouraging transit-oriented development. Therefore, the proposed Circulation Element Update does not include any development that would entail a wasteful commitment of energy or nonrenewable resources. The proposed Circulation Element Update would likely reduce long-term energy demand and the corresponding impacts.
The proposed Circulation Element Update would not have the potential to cause significant environmental accidents through hazardous material releases into the environment because it does not propose or entitle any specific development. While there are two active Cleanup and Abatement Orders listed on the Cortese List within the City, the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any development on these sites. Two areas on the western boundary of the City are classified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) within a Local Responsibility Area (LRA), and there is one portion of the City within a Moderate Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) within a State Responsibility Area (SRA). However, the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any development within these FHSZs. Therefore, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not involve uses in which irreversible damage could result from any potential environmental accidents.
188
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Alternatives to the Proposed Project FirstCarbon Solutions 6-1
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec06-00 Alternatives.docx CHAPTER 6: ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT
6.1 - Introduction
In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15126.6, this Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (Draft Subsequent EIR) contains a comparative impact assessment of alternatives to the proposed General Plan Circulation Element Update Project (Circulation Element Update). The primary purpose of this section is to provide decision-makers and the general public with a reasonable number of feasible project alternatives that could attain most of the basic project objectives while avoiding or reducing any of the proposed Circulation Element Update’s significant adverse environmental effects. Important considerations for these alternatives analyses are noted below (as stated in CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6). An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project; An EIR should identify alternatives that were considered by the lead agency but rejected as infeasible during the scoping process;
Reasons for rejecting an alternative include:
- Failure to meet most of the basic project objectives; - Infeasibility; or
- Inability to avoid significant environmental effects.
6.1.1 - Significant Unavoidable Impacts
The proposed Circulation Element Update would result in the following significant unavoidable impacts:
Project-level Vehicle Miles Traveled: While the proposed Circulation Element Update would result in decreases for Home-based Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) per Resident, Home-based Work VMT per Employee, and VMT per Service Population, the expected VMT per Service Population would not fall below the 15 percent VMT reduction threshold. As such, Mitigation Measure (MM) TRANS-2a, MM TRANS-2b, and MM TRANS-2c would require future individual development projects that do not screen out from a VMT impact analysis to provide a quantitative VMT analysis. If results indicate that the VMT associated with the individual development project would be above the threshold, it would be required to mitigate to a less than significant level. Projects consistent with the General Plan would be required to implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program and/or a regional VMT impact fee program (when it is available). Because the effectiveness of the TDM measures for future individual development projects cannot be quantified in this analysis and the VMT impact fee program is not yet in place, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable. Cumulative Vehicle Miles Traveled: Cumulative projects in the City and County will generate new VMT, which would be added to the roadway network within the geographic context. All cumulative projects would be reviewed for compliance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations, including General Plan policies that address VMT, as well as to mitigate their 189
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Alternatives to the Proposed Project FirstCarbon Solutions 6-2
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec06-00 Alternatives.docx fair share of impacts related to VMT. Nonetheless, the proposed Circulation Element Update, in conjunction with other reasonably foreseeable past, present, and future projects, would have a cumulatively significant impact related to VMT. Development consistent with the General Plan and the proposed Circulation Element Update would result in a significant and unavoidable cumulatively considerable contribution to the existing cumulative VMT impact, creating a potentially significant impact. Even with the incorporation of MM TRANS-2a, MM TRANS-2b, and MM TRANS-2c, the City may not achieve the overall VMT threshold reduction level due to uncertainty in the cumulative effectiveness of the measures included in MM TRANS-2a, MM TRANS-2b, and MM TRANS-2c as well as unknowns related to transit service levels, transportation technology, and travel behavior. Moreover, these policies and measures primarily apply to new developments; existing land uses that have already been approved and are under construction are generally not affected. Because of the programmatic nature of the proposed Circulation Element Update, no additional mitigation measures are available, and the cumulative impact is considered significant and unavoidable.
6.1.2 - Alternatives to the Proposed Project
Several Alternatives were considered for the proposed Circulation Element Update, the majority of which were rejected due to lack of feasibility. See Section 6.7 for more information. One alternative to the proposed Circulation Element Update is analyzed in this section is as follows:
No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element: Under the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element, the Circulation Element would not be updated with new policies and no General Plan Amendment would occur. Future development and land uses would occur in accordance with the current Circulation Element policies. Under this alternative, the current goals, policies, and actions would remain in place.
The alternative analysis compares the impacts of the alternative to those of the proposed Circulation Element Update. In several cases, the description of the impact may be the same under the alternative when compared with the CEQA Thresholds of Significance (i.e., both the project and the alternative would result in a less than significant impact). The actual degree of impact may be slightly different between the proposed Circulation Element Update and the alternative, and this relative difference is the basis for a conclusion of greater or lesser impacts.
6.2 - Project Objectives
The underlying purpose of the proposed Circulation Element Update is to address the current and future needs of residents, businesses, employees, and visitors to the City. As stated in Chapter 2, Project Description, the objectives of the proposed Circulation Element Update are to:
Update City policies in the Circulation Element to comply with State law, including State regulations related to conformance with SB 743.
Support the City’s compliance with State-mandated requirements to implement Complete Streets and make efforts to reduce VMT in the community. 190
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Alternatives to the Proposed Project FirstCarbon Solutions 6-3
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec06-00 Alternatives.docx Implement Complete Streets throughout the City.
Recognize the importance of reducing VMT in the City. Encourage the range of options for travel to work, shopping, and leisure destinations. Prioritize the efficiency of goods movement.
Adopt policies that guide the direction of physical development in the City in a way that encourages economic vitality and promotes quality of life.
6.3 - Alternative 1—No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element Under the No Project Alternative, the Circulation Element would not be updated with new policies and no General Plan Amendment would occur. Future development and land uses would occur in accordance with the current Circulation Element policies. Under this alternative, the current goals, policies, and actions would remain in place.
6.3.1 - Impact Analysis
Aesthetics, Light, and Glare
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to aesthetics, light, and glare because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect aesthetics, light, or glare. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
Agriculture Resources
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to agriculture resources because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development or physical environmental changes. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect agriculture resources. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
Air Quality
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to air quality because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development or physical environmental changes. Similarly, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element does not propose or entitle any specific development of physical environmental changes. However, this alternative would not include updates that would result in reductions in mobile source emissions related to VMT. Therefore, while this alternative would result in no impact (similar to the proposed 191
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Alternatives to the Proposed Project FirstCarbon Solutions 6-4
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec06-00 Alternatives.docx Circulation Element Update), the benefits of air quality impact reductions would not be realized and, as such, the project objectives would not be realized.
Biological Resources
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to biological resources because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development or ground-disturbing activities. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect biological resources. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
Cultural Resources
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to cultural resources because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development or ground-disturbing activities. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect cultural resources. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
Energy
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to energy because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect energy. However, this alternative would not include updates that would result in reductions in VMT, which would also decrease the use of fuel and other energy sources. Therefore, while this alternative would result in no impact (similar to the proposed Circulation Element Update) the benefits of energy reductions would not be realized and, as such, the project objectives would not be realized.
Geology, Soils, and Seismicity
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to geology, soils, and seismicity because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development or ground-disturbing activities. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect geology, soils, and seismicity. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
192
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Alternatives to the Proposed Project FirstCarbon Solutions 6-5
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec06-00 Alternatives.docx Greenhouse Gas Emissions
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development. However, this alternative would not include updates that would result in reductions in in VMT and mobile source emissions. Therefore, while this alternative would result in no impact (similar to the proposed Circulation Element Update) the benefits of GHG emissions reductions would not be realized and, as such, the project objectives would not be realized.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development or physical environmental changes. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect hazards and hazardous materials. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
Hydrology and Water Quality
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to hydrology and water quality because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development or ground-disturbing activities. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect hydrology and water quality. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
Land Use and Planning
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to land use because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development or land use changes. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect land use and planning. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
Noise
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to noise because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development or physical environmental changes. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect noise. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts. 193
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Alternatives to the Proposed Project FirstCarbon Solutions 6-6
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec06-00 Alternatives.docx Public Services
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to public services because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect public services. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
Transportation
As noted in Section 3.1, Transportation and Traffic, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would have less than significant impacts related to consistency with programs, plans, ordinances, and policies of the circulation system, hazards due to geometric design features or incompatible uses, and emergency access. However, the proposed Circulation Element Update would have significant and unavoidable impacts related to VMT, both at the project level and cumulatively. The proposed Circulation Element Update would result in reductions in VMT at 2040 General Plan buildout compared to the 2024 baseline estimates. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element does not propose or entitle any specific development of physical environmental changes. However, this alternative would not include updates that would result in reductions in mobile source emissions related to VMT. Therefore, while this alternative would result in no impact (similar to the proposed Circulation Element Update), the benefits of air quality impact reductions would not be realized and, as such, the project objectives would not be realized.
Tribal Cultural Resources
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development or ground-disturbing activities. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect TCRs. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
Utilities and Service Systems
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to utilities and service systems because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect utilities and service systems. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
Wildfire
As noted in Chapter 4, Effects Found not to be Significant, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the proposed Circulation Element Update would not have impacts related to wildfire because the proposed Circulation Element Update does not propose or entitle any specific development or ground194 City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Alternatives to the Proposed Project FirstCarbon Solutions 6-7
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec06-00 Alternatives.docx disturbing activities. The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would maintain current policies and would not propose any physical development that could affect wildfire. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would similarly result in no impacts.
6.3.2 - Conclusion
The No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would have similar impacts to the proposed Circulation Element Update’s no impact conclusion associated with aesthetics, light, and glare; agriculture resources; air quality; biological resources; cultural resources; energy; geology, soils, and seismicity; GHG emissions; hazards and hazardous materials; hydrology and water quality; land use and planning; mineral resources; noise; population and housing; public services; recreation; utilities and service systems; and wildfire. Similarly, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element does not propose or entitle any specific development of physical environmental changes. However, this alternative would not include updates that would result in reductions in mobile source emissions related to VMT. Therefore, while this alternative would result in no impact (similar to the proposed Circulation Element Update), the benefits of air quality impact reductions would not be realized and, as such, the project objectives would not be realized. Furthermore, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would result in unrealized project objectives.
6.4 - Environmentally Superior Alternative
The qualitative environmental effects of each alternative in relation to the proposed Circulation Element Update are summarized in Table 6-1.
Table 6-1: Summary of Alternatives
Environmental Topic Area
No Project
Alternative/Existing
Circulation Element
Aesthetics, Light, and Glare =
Agriculture Resources =
Air Quality ≥
Biological Resources =
Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources =
Energy ≥
Geology, Soils, and Seismicity =
Greenhouse Gas Emissions ≥
Hazards and Hazardous Materials =
Hydrology and Water Quality =
Land Use =
Minerals =
Noise =
195
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Alternatives to the Proposed Project FirstCarbon Solutions 6-8
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec06-00 Alternatives.docx Environmental Topic Area
No Project
Alternative/Existing
Circulation Element
Population and Housing =
Public Services =
Transportation ≥
Utilities =
Wildfire =
Notes:
= = Impact is similar to the proposed Circulation Element Update ≤ = Impact is less than or equal to the proposed Circulation Element Update ≥ = Impact is greater than or equal to the proposed Circulation Element Update Source: FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS). 2024.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(e)(2) requires identification of an environmentally superior alternative. If the No Project Alternative is environmentally superior, CEQA requires selection of the “environmentally superior alternative other than the No Project Alternative” from among the project and the alternatives evaluated.
As described above, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would result in similar, but greater, impacts related to transportation and traffic, air quality, energy, and GHG emissions than the proposed Circulation Element Update. As such, the No Project Alternative/Existing Circulation Element would be environmentally inferior to the proposed Circulation Element Update.
Furthermore, as described below, there are no other feasible alternatives that would reduce impacts as compared to the proposed Circulation Element Update.
6.5 - Alternatives Rejected From Further Consideration
Section 15126.6(c) of the CEQA Guidelines requires EIRs to identify any alternatives that were considered by the lead agency but were rejected as infeasible for detailed study, and briefly explain the reasons underlying the lead agency’s determination. Furthermore, Section 15126(f)(1) states that “among the factors that may be taken into account when addressing the feasibility of alternatives are site suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, general plan consistency, other plans or regulatory limitations, jurisdictional boundaries . . . ” and whether the proponent can reasonably acquire or control or otherwise have access to the alternative site. No one of these factors establishes a fixed limit on the scope of reasonable alternatives.
6.5.1 - Employment and Population Growth Alternative
An alternative that included land use changes to increase residential units and employment centers in the same areas was considered; however, this alternative was deemed infeasible because it is outside of the scope of the proposed Circulation Element Update, requiring updates to other General Plan Elements. This alternative would include changes to the land use designations of the General Plan in order to ensure population and employment growth within the City, thereby 196
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR Alternatives to the Proposed Project FirstCarbon Solutions 6-9
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec06-00 Alternatives.docx reducing VMT for residents and employees who regularly shop and work outside of the city limits.
However, this alternative was rejected from further consideration because the proposed Circulation Element Update would only include policy changes to the Circulation Element of the General Plan and would not have the ability to develop or enforce land use changes within the City.
6.5.2 - Major Transit Enhancement Alternative
The potential for City funding of a regional transit system composed of regional bus service and local funding of construction of the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) extension to Cloverdale was considered; however, this alternative was deemed infeasible. The proposed Circulation Element Update cannot guarantee the construction and operation of the SMART extension, although the City would support the extension and future grant-funding opportunities. A regional transit system expansion to serve the City would come with high costs and require substantial further coordination with other agencies. Funding for the regional transit expansion is uncertain and may be infeasible. As such, this alternative was rejected from further consideration.
6.5.3 - Alternative Location
CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(f)(2) sets forth considerations to be used in evaluating an alternative location. The section states that if a lead agency concludes that no feasible alternative locations exist for the proposed action, it must disclose its reasons for that conclusion. In this case, an alternative location does not constitute a feasible alternative because the project in question consists of a proposed Circulation Element Update, which would update the City’s General Plan. A General Plan serves as the comprehensive land use planning document for the jurisdiction that adopts it; as such, the geographical area encompassed by the plan is an immutable, fundamental characteristic. Thus, it is not possible to evaluate an alternative location for the proposed Circulation Element Update.
197
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Persons and Organizations Consulted/ Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR List of Preparers
FirstCarbon Solutions 7-1
X:\Community Development\Applications\2023\VMT Cirulation Element Update\CEQA\Subsequent EIR doc\48590005 Sec07-00 Preparers-Contributors.docx CHAPTER 7: PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED/LIST OF
PREPARERS
7.1 - City of Cloverdale
Assistant City Manager.................................................................................................. Kevin Thompson Associate Planner .............................................................................................................Rafael Miranda
7.2 - List of Preparers
7.2.1 - Lead Agency
City of Cloverdale
Assistant City Manager.................................................................................................. Kevin Thompson Associate Planner .............................................................................................................Rafael Miranda
7.2.2 - Lead Consultant
FirstCarbon Solutions
Project Director .......................................................................................................................Mary Bean Project Manager...............................................................................................................Madelyn Dolan Legal Counsel...................................................................................................................Megan Starr, JD Director of Cultural Resources.......................................................................... Dana DePietro, PhD, RPA Director of Noise and Air Quality .............................................................................. Phil Ault, LEED® AP Environmental Services Analyst........................................................................................ Laura Campion Senior Managing Editor......................................................................................................... Susie Harris Publications Coordinator.........................................................................................................Alec Harris Technical Editor .......................................................................................................................Sarah Vine Document Specialist.......................................................................................................Melissa Ramirez GIS/Graphics................................................................................................................ Karlee McCracken GIS/Graphics................................................................................................................. Sebastian Macias
7.2.3 - Technical Subconsultants
Fehr & Peers
Senior Associate ................................................................................................................ Ian Barnes, PE 198
·|}þ175
·|}þ116
£¤101
·|}þ1
·|}þ128
Mendocino County
Sonoma County
Guerneville Russian
River
Austin Creek
State Rec Area
Salt
Point State
Park
Mendocino NF
North
Lakeport
Lakeport
Finley Soda Bay
Glenhaven
Pepperwood
Grove
Lucerne
Kelseyville
Pine Grove
Cloverdale
Asti
Las Lomas
Geyserville
Healdsburg
Cazadero
Windsor
Larkfield-Wikiup
Fulton
Forestville
Monte Rio Villa Grande
Lake Sonoma
Clear Lake
Exh ibit 2-1
Reg ional Location Map
5 2.5 0 5
Miles
!
Text
Project Location
S ource: Census 2000 Data, Th e California S patial Inform ation Library (CaS IL).
I
CITY OF CLOVERDALE
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE PROJECT
S UBS EQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
48590005 • 04/2024 | 2-1_reg ional.m xd
5 99
Legend
City of Cloverdale
199
48590005 • 04/2024 | 2-2_local_vicin ity.m xd CITY OF CLOVERDALE
GENERAL PLAN CIRCU LATION ELEMENT U PDATE PROJECT
SU BSEQU ENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Exhibit 2-2
Local Vicin ity Map
Source: ESRI World Topographic Map.
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 I Feet
Legend
City of Cloverdale
Urban Growth Boundary
Northwestern Pacific Railroad
bÆSMART Station/
Cloverdale Depot
£¤101
Northwestern Pacific Railroad
200
I
48590005 04/2024 | 2-3_GPLU.cdr • CITY OF CLOVERDALE
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE PROJECT
SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Source: City of Cloverdale.
Exhibit 2-3
General Plan Land Use Map
201
48590005 • 04/2024 | 3.1-1_street_classifications.cdr CITY OF CLOVERDALE
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE PROJECT
SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Exhibit 3.1-1
Street Classifications
Source: Fehr & Peers, 04/2024
I
202
48590005 • 06/2024 | 3.1-2_existing_transit_system.cdr CITY OF CLOVERDALE
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE PROJECT
SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Exhibit 3.1-2
Existing Transit System
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
203
48590005 • 04/2024 | 3.1-3_Existing and Proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities.cdr CITY OF CLOVERDALE
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE PROJECT
SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Exhibit 3.1-3
Existing and Proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Source: Fehr & Peers, 04/2024
I
204
48590005 • 06/2024 | 3.1-4_potential_site_groups.cdr CITY OF CLOVERDALE
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE PROJECT
SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Exhibit 3.1-4
Potential Site Groups
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.
205
FINAL
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report
General Plan Circulation Element Update Project
City of Cloverdale, Sonoma County, California
State Clearinghouse Number 2024010982
Prepared for:
City of Cloverdale
Planning and Community Development Department
124 North Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
707.894.1723
Contact: Kevin Thompson, Assistant City Manager
Prepared by:
FirstCarbon Solutions
2999 Oak Road, Suite 250
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
925.357.2562
Contact: Janna Waligorski, Project Director
Madelyn Dolan, Project Manager
Date: March 4, 2025
•• • FCS
An ADEC Innovation
206
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
207
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Final Subsequent EIR Table of Contents
FirstCarbon Solutions iii https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/4859/48590005/EIR/3 - Final EIR/48590005 Sec00-01 TOC.docx Table of Contents
Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1-1 Section 2: Responses to Written Comments................................................................................ 2-1
2.1 - List of Authors ................................................................................................................ 2-1
2.2 - Responses to Comments................................................................................................ 2-1 208
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
209
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Final Subsequent EIR Introduction
FirstCarbon Solutions 1-1 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/4859/48590005/EIR/3 - Final EIR/48590005 Sec01-00 Introduction.docx SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION
In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15088, the City of Cloverdale (Lead Agency) has evaluated the comments received on the General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (Draft Subsequent EIR).
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15132, this Final Subsequent EIR includes the agency that provided comments on the Draft Subsequent EIR; responses to the comments received regarding the Draft Subsequent EIR; as well as a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for use by the City of Cloverdale during its review.
This document is organized into two sections:
• Section 1—Introduction. Provides an introduction to the Final EIR. • Section 2—Responses to Written Comment Letter. Provides the agency that commented on the Draft Subsequent EIR. A copy of the letter received regarding the Draft Subsequent EIR and responses thereto are included in this section.
The Final EIR includes the following contents:
• Draft Subsequent EIR (provided under separate cover)
• Draft Subsequent EIR Appendices (provided under separate cover) • Responses to Written Comment Letter on the Draft Subsequent EIR (Sections 2 this document) • Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (provided under separate cover) 210
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
211
City of Cloverdale—General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Final Subsequent EIR Responses to Written Comments
FirstCarbon Solutions 2-1 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/4859/48590005/EIR/3 - Final EIR/48590005 Sec02-00 Responses to Written Comments.docx SECTION 2: RESPONSES TO WRITTEN COMMENTS
2.1 - List of Authors
Only one public agency, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), commented on the General Plan Circulation Element Update Project Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (Draft Subsequent EIR), presented below. Individual comments within this communication have been numbered so comments can be cross-referenced with responses. Following this list, the text of the communication is reprinted and followed by the corresponding response.
Author Author Code
State Agencies
California Department of Transportation.................................................................................CALTRANS
2.2 - Responses to Comments
2.2.1 - Introduction
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15088, the City of Cloverdale, as the Lead Agency, evaluated the comment letter received on the Draft Subsequent EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2024010982) for the General Plan Circulation Element Update Project (proposed project), and has prepared the following responses to the comment letter received. This Responses to Comments document becomes part of the Final EIR for the project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15132.
2.2.2 - Comment Letters and Responses
The comment letter reproduced in the following pages follows the same organization as used in the List of Authors.
212
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
213
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment.” DISTRICT 4
OFFICE OF REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY PLANNING
P.O. BOX 23660, MS–10D | OAKLAND, CA 94623-0660
www.dot.ca.gov
October 28, 2024 SCH #: 2024010982
GTS #: 04-SON-2024-00937
GTS ID: 31932
Co/Rt/Pm: SON/101/VAR
Kevin Thompson, Planning and Community Development
City of Cloverdale
124 North Cloverdale Boulevard
Cloverdale, CA 95425
Re: General Plan Circulation Element Update Project ɔ Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)
Dear Kevin:
Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the environmental review process for the General Plan Circulation Element Update Project. The Local Development Review (LDR) Program reviews land use projects and plans to ensure consistency with our mission and state planning priorities. The following comments are based on our review of the September 2024 DEIR.
Please note this correspondence does not indicate an official position by Caltrans on this project and is for informational purposes only.
Project Understanding
The proposed Circulation Element Update identifies the guiding principles for moving people and goods within the City of Cloverdale and identifies the infrastructure necessary to assure that the transportation network will serve the City at General Plan buildout. The goals, policies, and implementation actions would support the City’s compliance with State-mandated requirements to implement Complete Streets and make efforts to reduce VMT in the community.
Travel Demand Analysis
With the enactment of Senate Bill (SB) 743, Caltrans is focused on maximizing efficient development patterns, innovative travel demand reduction strategies, and multimodal improvements. For more information on how Caltrans assesses Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis for land use projects, please review Caltrans’ Transportation Impact Study Guide (link).
CALTRANS
1 of 2
1 3
2 CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR California Department of Transportation
214
Kevin Thompson, Planning and Community Development
October 28, 2024