Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Clovis City Council
January 18, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
January 18, 2022
Body
Clovis City Council
Pages
7
Original file
39.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on clovisca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

January 18, 2022 - 1 - 7:22 PM A G E N D A • C I T Y C O U N C I L M E E T I N G

January 18, 2022 6:00 PM Council Chamber

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to access the City Council Chamber to participate at this meeting, please contact the City Clerk or General Services Director at (559) 324 -2060 (TTY – 711). Notificatio n 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the Council Chamber.

The Clovis City Council meetings are open to the public at the physical address listed above. There are numerous ways to participate in the City Council meetings: you are able to attend in person; you may submit written comments as described below; you may participate by calling in by phone (see “Verbal Comments” below); and you may view the meeting which is webcast and acces sed at www.cityofclovis.com/agendas.

Written Comments

 Members of the public are encouraged to submit written comments at:
www.cityofclovis.com/agendas at least two (2) hours before the meeting (4:00 p.m.). You will be prompted to provide:

 Council Meeting Date
 Item Number
 Name
 Email
 Comment

 Please submit a separate form for each item you are commenting on.

 A copy of your written comment will be provided to the City Council noting the item number.

If you wish to make a verbal comment, please see instructions below.

 Please be aware that any written comments received that do not specify a particular agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the agenda.

 If a written comment is received after 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting, efforts will be made to provide the comment to the City Council during the meeting. However, staff cannot guarantee that written comments received after 4:00 p.m. will be provided to City Council during the meeting. All written comments received prior to the end of the meeting will be made part of the record of proceedings.

Council Chamber, 1033 Fifth Street, Clovis, CA 93612 (559) 324-2060 www.cityofclovis.com
1 January 18, 2022 - 2 - 7:22 PM Verbal Comments

 If you wish to speak to the Council on an item by telephone, you should contact the City Clerk at (559) 324-2060 no later than 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting.

 You will be asked to provide your name, phone number, and your email. You will be emailed instructions to log into Webex to participate in the meeting. Staff recommends participants log into the Webex at 5:30 p.m. the day of the meeting to perform an audio check.

 All callers will be placed on mute, and at the appropriate time for your comment your microphone will be unmuted.

 In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less, or 10 minutes per topic

Webex Participation

 Reasonable efforts will be made to allow written and verbal comment from a participant communicating with the host of the virtual meeting. To do so, a participant will need to chat with the host and request to make a written or verbal comment. The host w ill make reasonable efforts to make written and verbal comments available to the City Council. Due to the new untested format of these meetings, the City cannot guarantee that these written and verbal comments initiated via chat will occur. Participants desiring to make a verbal comment via chat will need to ensure that they accessed the meeting with audio transmission capabilities.

CALL TO ORDER

FLAG SALUTE - Councilmember Whalen

ROLL CALL

PUBLIC COMMENTS - This is an opportunity for the members of the public to address the City Council on any matter within the City Council’s jurisdiction that is not listed on the Agenda. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less, or 10 minutes per topic. Anyone wishing to be placed on the Agenda for a specific topic should contact the City Manager’s office and submit correspondence at least 10 days before the desired date of appearance.

ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS - With respect to the approval of resolutions and ordinances, the reading of the title shall be deemed a motion to waive a reading of the complete resolution or ordinance and unless there is a request by a Councilmember that the resolution or ordinance be read in full, furth er reading of the resolution or ordinance shall be deemed waived by unanimous consent of the Council.

CONSENT CALENDAR - Items considered routine in nature are to be placed upon the Consent Calendar. They will all be considered and voted upon in one vote as one item unless a Councilmember requests individual consideration. A Councilmember’s vote in favor of the Consent Calendar is considered and recorded as a separate affirmative vote in favor of each action listed. Motions in favor of adoption of the C onsent Calendar are deemed to include a motion to waive the reading of any ordinance or resolution on the Consent Calendar. For adoption of 2 January 18, 2022 - 3 - 7:22 PM ordinances, only those that have received a unanimous vote upon introduction are considered Consent items.

1. Administration - Approval - Minutes from the January 10, 2022 Council Meeting.

2. Administration - Receive and File – Business Organization of Old Town (BOOT) First Quarter Report, July through September 2021.

3. Administration - Approval – 2022 Street Closure Requests; and Approval - Res. 22- ____, Declaring Certain Events as Old Town Special Events an d Setting Precise Boundaries for Those Old Town Special Events.

4. Finance – Receive and File – Status Report of Development Fee Funds for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021.

5. Finance – Receive and File – Investment Report for the Month of September 2021.

6. Finance – Receive and File – Treasurer’s Report for the Month of September 2021.

7. Finance – Receive and File – Investment Report for the Month of October 2021.

8. Finance – Receive and File – Treasurer’s Report for the Month of October 2021.

9. General Services – Approval – Res.- 22-___, Amending the FY 2021 -2022 Transit Budget to add funds for purchase of the three (3) Ram Promaster Minibuses; and Waive the City’s Usual Purchasing Requirements and authorize the purchase of three (3) Ram Promaster Minibuses utilizing the CalACT Competitive Bid Award.

10. General Services – Approval – Res. 22-___, Authorizing Amendments to t he Permit Technician Classification in the Planning and Development Services Department.

11. Planning and Development Services - Approval – Final Acceptance for CIP 20 -06 Shaw Avenue Street Rehabilitation.

12. Planning and Development Services – Approval – Res. 22 -___, Amending the FY 2021-2022 Community Investment Program (CIP) Budget for CIP 14-30, Shaw Avenue Widening – Phase 1 from Leonard to McCa ll Avenues; Bid Award for CIP 14 -30 to Avison Construction, Inc.; and Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract on behalf of the City.

13. Planning and Development Services – Approval – Res. 22-____, Amending the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) Schedule of Drainage Costs and Fees for 2022-2023.

PUBLIC HEARINGS - A public hearing is an open consideration within a regular or special meeting of the City Council, for which specia l notice has been given and may be required. When a public hearing is continued, noticing of the adjourned item is required as per Government Code 54955.1.

14. Consider Actions related to Annexation of Territory (Annexation #72, T6349 - NEC Shaw/Locan & T6377 SEC Shaw/Leonard) to the City of Clovis Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Police and Fire Services).

a. Consider Approval - Res. 22-___, A Resolution annexing territory (Annexation #72) (T6349 - NEC Shaw/Locan & T6377 SEC Shaw/Leonard) to th e City of Clovis Community Facilities District No. 2004 -1 (Police and Fire Services) and calling a special landowner election to annex territory (Annexation #72) to City of Clovis Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Police and Fire Services).

3 January 18, 2022 - 4 - 7:22 PM b. Consider Approval - Res. 22-___, A Resolution of the City of Clovis declaring the results of a special landowner election and directing recording of the Notice of Special Tax Lien for City of Clovis Community Facilities District No. 2004 -1 (Police and Fire Services).

Staff: Jay Schengel, Finance Director
Recommendation: Approve

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS - Administrative Items are matters on the regular City Council Agenda other than Public Hearings.

15. Consider various actions associated with CIP 16-19, the State Route 168 / Enterprise Canal Pedestrian Bridge Project, east of Temperance Avenue and south of Owens Mountain Parkway.

a. Receive and File – Status update on the design of the pedestrian bridge.

b. Consider approval of terminating the pedestrian bridge design contract with Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc.

Staff: Renee Mathis, Planning and Development Services Director / Mike Harrison, City Engineer
Recommendation: Receive and File and Approve

CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

16. COVID-19 Update.

COUNCIL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

MEETINGS AND KEY ISSUES

Regular City Council Meetings are held at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber. The following are future meeting dates:

Feb. 7, 2022 (Mon.)
Feb. 14, 2022 (Mon.)
Feb. 22, 2022 (Tue.) Joint Meeting with Planning Commission Mar. 7, 2022 (Mon.)
Mar. 14, 2022 (Mon.)
Mar. 21, 2022 (Mon.)

4 PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

Page 1 of 4 ends

CLOVIS CITY COUNCIL MEETING

January 10, 2022 6:00 P.M. Council Chamber

Meeting called to order by Mayor Flores at 6:01 p.m.

Flag Salute led by Councilmember Mouanoutoua

Roll Call: Present: Councilmembers Ashbeck, Bessinger, Mouanoutoua, Whalen Mayor Flores

PRESENTATION – 6:02

6:02 - ITEM 1 - PRESENTATION BY THE LOCAL MISS AMERICA O RGANIZATION INTRODUCING MISS CLOVIS AND MISS CLOVIS TEEN.

Adam Smith, Director of the Local Miss America Organization, introduced Miss Clovis 2022, Caleigh Alday, and Miss Clovis’ Outstanding Teen 2022, Kayli Gibbons.

Caleigh Alday, Miss Clovis 2022, shared her platform of supporting the Clovis community’s youths in foster care.

Kayli Gibbons, Miss Clovis Outstanding Teen 2022, shared her platform of Linking & Learning, providing mentorship and scholarships to underprivileged youths in the community.

6:11 - ITEM 2 - PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DECLARING JANUARY AS NATIONAL SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING PREVENTION MONTH.

The Clovis City Council presented a proclamation declaring January as National Salvery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month to the Fresno EOC Central Valley Against Human Trafficking ( CVAHT). Amber Sec undino, Project Manager with Fresno EOC CVAHT, introduced Community Partners and commented on the work that is done to stop trafficking.

6:16 - ITEM 3 - PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION TO SENIOR SANITATION OPERATOR LEVY LOPEZ OF THE CI TY’S PUBLIC UTILITIES DEP ARTMENT FOR HEROIC ACTIONS TAKEN.

The Clovis City Council presented a proclamation honoring Levy Lopez for the life saving heroic actions he took to help a community member in need. Ivette Rodriguez, Solid Waste Manager with the City of Clovis Public Utilities Department, commended Levy for his courageous act and congratulated Levy for earning the Safe Fleet 2021 Public Safety Hero Award.

5 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

Page 2 of 4 ends

PUBLIC COMMENTS – 6:24

Slavic, homeless citizen, commented on homeowner rights.

CONSENT CALENDAR – 6:28

Councilmember Whalen identified a conflict of interest with Items 13 and 14 due to owning property within 1000 feet of the projects and will abstain from voting on these items.

Motion by Councilmember Ashbeck, seconded by Councilmember Bessginer, that the items on the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Items 13 and 14, be approved. Motion carried by unaminous vote.

4. Administration - Approved - Minutes from the December 6, 2021 and December 13, 2021 Council Meetings.

5. General S ervices – Approved – Res. 22 -01, Amending the City’s FY 21 -22 Position Allocation Plan by adding one (1) Management Analyst position and deleting one (1) Housing Program Coordinator position within the Administration Department.

6. General Services – Approved - Claim Rejection of the General Liability Claim on behalf of Victor Ray Vidrio, III.

7. Planning and Development Services – Approved – Final Acceptance for CIP 16-20, Owens Mountain & Temperance Roundabout.

8. Planning and Development Services – Approved – Bid Award for CIP 21 -23 Bus Bay at Department of Social Services; and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Contract on behalf of the City.

9. Planning and Development Services – Approved – Bid Award for CIP 21-08 Sierra Meadows Monument Sign; an d Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Contract on behalf of the City.

10. Planning and Development Services – Approved – Bid Award for CIP 20 -09 Sewer Replacement; and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Contract on behalf of the City.

11. Planning and Development Services – Approved – Res. 22-02, Bid Award for CIP 21 -06 Modular Training Facility; and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Contract on behalf of the City, Amending the 2021 -2022 Community Investment Program Budget for General Services Fund.

12. Planning and Development Services - Approved - Bid Award for CIP 19 -08, Traffic Signal Pedestrian Modifications; and Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract on behalf of the City.

6:30 – CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 13 - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICE S – APPROVED – RES. 22-03, FINAL MAP TRACT 634 8, LOCATED AT THE NO RTHEAST

CORNER OF WEST NEES AND NORTH TIMMY AVEN UES (GLENEAGLES HOME S, GARY MCDONALD HOMES).

Motion for approval by Councilmember Ashbeck, seconded by Councilmember Bessinger.

Motion carried 4-0-0-1 with Councilmember Whalen abstained.

6 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

Page 3 of 4 ends

6:32 – CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 14 - PLANNING AND DEVELOP MENT SERVICES – APPROVED – RES. 22-04, ANNEXATION OF PROP OSED TRACT 6348, LOC ATED AT

THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST NEES AND NO RTH TIMMY AVENUES, TO TH E LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS (GLENEAGLES HOMES, GARY MCDONALD HOMES).

Motion for approval by Councilmember Ashbeck, seconded by Councilmember Bessinger.

Motion carried 4-0-0-1 with Councilmember Whalen abstained.

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS – 6:34

6:34 – ITEM 15 - UPDATE ON THE SIXTH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMEN T PROCESS AND

CONSIDERATION OF PAR TIAL PARTICIPATION I N A MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HOUSING ELEMENT EFFORT.

It was the consensus of Council to not participate in the Partial Participation Multi- Jurisdictional Housing Effort . Council provided direction to staff to continue pursuing an independent Housing Element.

COUNCIL ITEMS – 7:42

7:42 – ITEM 16 - APPROVED APPOINTMENT OF A CIT IZENS’ ADVISORY COMM ITTEE TO EVALUATE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT’S FUNDING , OPERATIONS AND STA FFING

LEVELS, AND REPORT BACK WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ON SERVICES PROVIDED, EFFICIENCIES, OPERAT IONS, AND FUNDING ; AND CONSIDER APPROV AL OF COMMITTEE GUIDELINES WITH THE RECOMMENDED CHANGES BY COUNCIL.

Mike Cunningham, resident, commented on the size of the Citizens’ Advisory Committee and shared concerns regarding the inclusion of committee members who are not Clovis residents.

Motion for approval by Councilmember Bessinger, seconded by Councilmember Mouanoutoua. Motion carried 4-1 with Councilmember Ashbeck voting no.

CITY MANAGER COMMENTS – 8:37

8:37 – ITEM 17 - COVID-19 Update.

COUNCIL COMMENTS – 8:58

7 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

Page 4 of 4 ends

Mayor Flores adjourned the meeting of the Council to January 18, 2022

Meeting adjourned: 9:02 p.m.

______________________________ ________________________________ Mayor City Clerk
8 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Administration
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Administration - Receive and File – Business Organization of Old Town (BOOT) First Quarter Report, July through September 2021.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Business Organization of Old Town (B.O.O.T.) First Quarter Report, July through September 2021.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council receive and file the B.O.O.T. First Quarter Report, July through September 2021.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
According to the 202 1–2022 agreement between the City of Clovis and the Business Organization of Old Town, B.O.O.T. is to submit quarterly reports to the City Manager and City Council. The amount to be funded is $15,000.

BACKGROUND
According to the 202 1-2022 agreement between the City of Clovis and the Business Organization of Old Town, B.O.O.T. is to submit quarterly reports to the City Manager and City Council detailing progress of B.O.O.T.’s promotional and marketing activity. Attached, as Attachment 1 is the First Quarter Rep ort covering July through September 202 1 activities. The amount to be funded is $15,000.

FISCAL IMPACT
The amount to be funded is $15,000, which is called out in the 2021-2022 Budget.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
The attached report meets the requirement es tablished in the 202 1-2022 agreement between the City of Clovis and the Business Organization of Old Town.

9 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will process payment to B.O.O.T.

Prepared by: Shawn Miller, Business Development Manager

Reviewed by: City Manager __AH__

10 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

ATTACHMENT 1 11
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.
12 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.
13 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.
14 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Administration
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Administration - Approval – 2022 Street Closure Requests; and Approval - Res. 22-____, Declaring Certain Events as Old Town Special Events and Setting Precise Boundaries for Those Old Town Special Events.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 22-___

2. Matrix of Old Town Events

3. Letter to PBIA

4. Summary of Old Town Special Events Ordinance

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the requests from BOOT, Clovis Chamber of Commerce, Clovis Elks Lodge, Clovis Rodeo Association, Old Town Clovis Kiwanis, Fleet Feet Sports, Make -A- Wish Foundation, and Clovis Senior Center for street closures in the City of Clovis for the calendar year 2022; and approve Res. No. 22-___ declaring certain events as Old Town Special Events, and setting precise boundaries for those Old Town Special Events.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff requests street closure simultaneously, and in advance, to allow for proper event planning.

A resolution (Attachment “A”) is required by Ordinance 00 -02, adopted January 10, 2000, declaring certain events as Old Town Special Events and the setting of precise boundaries.

Requests for street closure are attached.

BACKGROUND
Attached is a matrix of the events (Attachment “B”), sponsored by BOOT, Clovis Chamber of Commerce, Clovis Elks Lodge, Clovis Rodeo Association, Old Town Clovis Kiwanis, Fleet Feet Sports, Make-A-Wish Foundation, and Clovis Senior Center for closure of streets in Clovis during the calendar year 2022. Each activity has a unique street closure request. The boundaries and time of street closure remain the same as 2021 for all returning events.

15 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

A letter was sent to Old Town merchants and property owners on December 9, 2021 (Attachment “C”), soliciting comments/concerns regarding the 2022 street closures. Staff has received no comments or concerns on these events.

The Old Town Special Events Ordinance was ad opted by Council on January 10, 2000 and provides guidelines for the operation of Old Town Special Events. A summary of the Old Town Special Events Ordinance is attached (Attachment “D”). A resolution (Attachment “A”) is required by Ordinance 00-02, adopted January 10, 2000, declaring certain events as Old Town Special Events and the setting of precise boundaries.

Additionally, Staff requests the ability to implement street closures at Centennial Plaza and Clovis Veterans Memorial District (CVMD) with le ss than 60 -day lead time. If approved, this method of processing street closure request(s) will require staff review; Special Event Committee Review; written notification distribution to all residents, property owners, and business operators who may be aff ected by the street closure/event – giving them ten calendar days to respond; Traffic control plan; ABC license application (if necessary); insurance documents; and appropriate permit applications. Like all other street closure requests, staff will continue to work with neighbors and applicant to assure a safe and successful event.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City of Clovis is positively impacted by the proposed events. Local businesses benefit from large numbers of people visiting their neighborhood and the City o f Clovis benefits from the increased tax revenue.

Some events require additional City services. Per Council’s decision of November 16, 2009, and starting July 1, 2010, the City of Clovis will help offset the costs of certain events. These include, and are limited to, Big Hat Days, Clovis Rodeo Parade, Farmers Market, Freedom Fest, Clovis Fest, Antique and Collectible Fair, Freedom Fest, and Children’s Electrical Parade.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
In previous years, more than 300,000 people have attended the various events held in Clovis annually, many of whom have returned to Clovis to patronize local businesses. In the past, BOOT, Clovis Chamber of Commerce, Clovis Elks Lodge, Clovis Rodeo Association, Old Town Clovis Kiwanis, Clovis Veterans Memorial District, Fleet Feet Sports, Make-A-Wish Foundation, and Clovis Senior Center requested street closures to hold events in Old Town on an individual basis, prior to the event. There have been several occasions where the requests were not processed in time t o allow for proper planning from the City’s perspective. Therefore, staff is requesting street closure simultaneously for all of the special events to ensure adequate time for event planning.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL

1. Staff will notify BOOT, Clovis Chamber of Commerce, Clovis Elks Lodge, Clovis Rodeo Association, Old Town Clovis Kiwanis, Fleet Feet Sports, Make -A-Wish Foundation, and Clovis Senior Center of Council’s decision.

16 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

2. Staff will work with BOOT, Clovis Chamber of Commerce, Clovis Elks Lodge, Clovis Rodeo Association, Old Town Clovis Kiwanis, Fleet Feet Sports, Make -A-Wish Foundation, and Clovis Senior Center to ensure that the sponsors provide security and cleanup of the events on an individual basis.

Prepared by: Shawn Miller, Business Development Manager

Reviewed by: City Manager __AH__

17 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

RESOLUTION 22-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS DECLARING

CERTAIN EVENTS AS OLD TOWN SPECIAL EVENTS

WHEREAS, BOOT, Clovis Chamber of Commerce, Clovis Elks Lodge, Clovis Rodeo Association, Old Town Clovis Kiwanis, Clovis Veterans Memorial District, Fleet Feet Sports, Make-A-Wish Foundation, and Clovis Senior Center have requested public street closures in the City of Clovis for the 2022 calendar year to conduct such special events as listed in 2022 City of Clovis Special Events Request for Old Town Street Closures; and

WHEREAS, the special events sponsored by BOOT, Clovis Chamber of Commerce, Clovis Elks Lodge, Cl ovis Rodeo Association, Old Town Clovis Kiwanis, Clovis Veterans Memorial District, Fleet Feet Sports, Make-A-Wish Foundation, and Clovis Senior Center shall be declared Old Town Special Events; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Clovis approves and authorizes the closure of public streets to be used for the attached listed special events.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Clovis hereby declares that the events as described in the 2022 City of Clovis Special Events Request for Old Town Street Closures be declared as Old Town Special Events.

* * * * *

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on the 18th day of January 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED: January 18, 2022

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

ATTACHMENT 1 18
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.
2022 CITY OF CLOVIS SPECIAL EVENTS

REQUEST FOR OLD TOWN STREET CLOSURES

DATE TIME EVENT SPONSOR STREETS
Every Saturday 7 AM to 12:30 PM Year Round Farmers Mkt BOOT Pollasky (5th to 7th); Bullard (Woodworth to Pollasky) March 13 (Sunday) 12 PM to 10 PM Craft Beer Crawl BOOT Pollasky (4th to 7th) Fifth Street to remain open March 27 (Sunday) 2 AM to 8 PM Vintage Market BOOT Pollasky (3rd to 7th); 4th (Woodworth to Clovis); 5th (Woodworth to Clovis); Bullard (Woodworth to Pollasky).

April 2 & 3 (Sat.& Sun.) Sat @ 5 AM to Sun @ 7 PM Big Hat Days (Event) Chamber of Commerce
Parking lots #1, #2, & #3. Pollasky (3 rd to 9th); Bullard (Dewitt to Clovis); 4th (Clovis to Woodworth); 7th (Clovis to Woodworth); Woodworth (5th to 7th); 8th (Clovis to Woodworth); 5th (Clovis to Woodworth) 5AM – 9PM each day only.

Set-up will take place on Friday, April 6 on 4th starting at 3PM and on Bullard (Woodworth to Pollasky) starting at 8PM.

April 23 (Saturday) 8 AM to 12 PM Rodeo Parade Rodeo Association Clovis (3rd to Barstow); Pollasky (3rd to Barstow); 3rd, 4th, 5th, Bullard, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, Lincoln, Barstow (Pollasky to Clovis); Jefferson (Clovis to Brookhaven); San Jose (Cole to Railroad); Railroad (Jefferson to San Jose).

April 29 thru Oct 28
(Friday Nights)
4:00 PM to 11:00 PM Friday Night Farmer's
Market
BOOT Pollasky (3rd to 7th); 5th OPEN; Bullard (Pollasky to Woodworth); 4th (Woodworth to Pollasky/Clovis alley).

May 14 (Saturday) 3:30 PM to 10 PM Old Town Wine Walk BOOT Pollasky (4th to 5th).

May 14 (Saturday) 6:00 AM to 12 Midnight Make-A-Wish Golf Michelangelo’s Bullard between Woodworth and Alley between Woodwaorth and Pollasky May 21 (Saturday) 5 AM to 5 PM Old Town Car Show BOOT Pollasky (3rd to 8th); Parking Lot #1; 4 th (Woodworth to Clovis); 5th (Woodworth to Clovis); Bullard (Woodworth to Pollasky)
May 29 (Sunday) 2 AM to 8 PM Vintage Market BOOT Pollasky (3rd to 7th); 4th (Woodworth to Clovis); 5th (Woodworth to Clovis); Bullard (Woodworth to Pollasky).

June 14 (Tuesday) 10:30 AM to 1:30 PM Flag Day Observation Clovis Elks Lodge Pollasky (5th to 7th); Bullard (Woodworth to Pollasky).

July 22 (Friday) 3 PM to 11:00 PM Pole Vault Championships BOOT Pollasky (3rd to 7th); 5th OPEN; Bullard (Pollasky to Woodworth); 4th (Woodworth to Pollasky/Clovis alley).

August 13 (Saturday) Sat: 5 AM to 3 PM Hot August Daze Clovis Elks Lodge Woodworth (Bullard to 5th), Parking Lot #3).

October 16 (Sunday) 2 AM to 8 PM Vintage Market BOOT Pollasky (3rd to 7th); 4th (Woodworth to Clovis); 5th (Woodworth to Clovis); Bullard (Woodworth to Pollasky).

September 24 & 25
(Sat.& Sun.)
Sat @ 5 AM to Sun @ 6 PM Clovis Fest (Event) Chamber of Commerce
Parking lots #1, #2, & #3. Pollasky (3 rd to 8th); Bullard (Dewitt to Clovis); 4th (Clovis to Woodworth); 7th (Clovis to Woodworth); Woodworth (5th to 7th); 8th (Clovis to Woodworth); 5th (Clovis to Woodworth) 5AM – 9PM each day only.

Set-up will take place on Friday, October 26 on 4th starting at 3PM and on Bullard (Woordorth to Pollasky) starting at 8PM.

October 29 (Saturday) 3:30 PM to 10 PM Old Town Wine Walk BOOT Pollasky (4th to 5th).

November 6 (Sunday) 6 AM to 11 AM 2 Cities Marathon Fleet Feet Sports Various Old Town Streets November 12 (Saturday) 10 AM to 3 PM BBQ Contest Grill Masters Parking Lot @ Elks Lodge; Woodworth (Bullard to Fifth) November 17 (Thursday) 4 PM to 9 PM One Enchanted Evening BOOT Pollasky (3rd to 7th); 5th OPEN; 4th (Clovis to Woodworth); Bullard (Pollasky to Woodworth). Fifth street to remain open.

December 3 (Saturday) 5 PM to 8 PM Children's Electric
Christmas Parade
Old Town Clovis
Kiwanis
Clovis Ave. (3rd to 9th); Pollasky (3rd to 9th); 3rd, 4th 5th 7th Bullard, 8th (Pollasky to Clovis).

ATTACHMENT 2
19 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

City Manager 559.324.2060 • Finance 559.324.2130 • Fire 559.324.2200 • General Ser vices 559.324.2060 Planning & De velopment Services 559.324.2340 • Police 559.324.2400 • Public Utilities 559.324.2600 • TTY-711 www.cityofclovis.com

ATTACHMENT 3

December 9, 2021

Subject: 2022 Old Town Street Closures

Dear Old Town Merchant, Resident and/or Property Owner:

Attached is a list of requested street closures for calendar year 2022.

Please review this list and forward any concerns in writing to my attention by noon, Monday, December 20, 2021. The Clovis City Council will consider these requests in January.

If you have any questions or need further information, Please feel free to contact me at 324- 2083, or by email at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Shawn A. Miller, Business Development Manager
City of Clovis

20 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

ORDINANCE NO. 00-02

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS ADDING CHAPTER 20, OF TITLE 5, OF THE CLOVIS MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO

OLD TOWN SPECIAL EVENTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 20, of Title 5, of the Clovis Municipal Code is added to read as follows:

Chapter 20: OLD TOWN SPECIAL EVENTS
Section 5.20.01 Findings and declaration of intent.

The City Council finds and declares that it has historically closed City streets in portions of the downtown area, commonly referred to as Old Town Clovis, for the purpose of assisting certain community and regional events benefitting Old Town Clovis, the community at large and non-profit business organizations operating in the City. Control over the operation of these community and regional events has traditionally been turned over to the entity sponsoring the event. The City Council finds and declares that there is a need to provide written guidelines and regulations on how these Old Town community and regional events shall operate. In enacting this chapter, it is not the intent of the Council to declare all events held in Old Town Clovis a declared "Old Town Special Event." Events not declared "Old Town Special Events" shall be subject to other applicable City ordinances. (§ 1, Ord. 00- 02, eff. February 17, 2000)
Section 5.20.03 Old Town Special Event.
(a) "Old Town Special Event" means any outdoor public event utilizing public areas, including streets and parking lots temporarily closed by the City Council, in the vicinity of Old Town Clovis, and which event has been declared an Old Town Special Event by resolution of the City Council. The outside maximum boundaries for a declared Old Town Special Event shall consist of the eastern line of the Clovis Old Town Trail (former railroad right-of-way corridor), the southern line of Barstow Avenue, the western line of Woodworth Avenue, and the northern line of Second Avenue.

Old Town Special Events include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Farmers' Market, generally held from May to September; (2) Antique and Collectible Fair, generally held several times a year; (3) Clovisfest Musicale, generally held in September;
(4) Big Hat Days, generally held in April;
(5) Children' s Christmas Parade, generally held in December. (b) Any person seeking to have a public event declared an Old Town Special Event shall seek a declaration from the City Council at least ninety (90) days prior to the event. If a street closure is required in connection with the proposed Old Town Special Event, such request shall be made at the same time.
(c) The declaration of the City Council shall establish the precise boundaries of the Old Town Special Event and designate an event sponsor.
(d) The City Council may by resolution delegate the authority to declare an Old Town Special Event, and to temporarily close City streets in connection therewith, to the City Manager and the City Manager' s designee. (§ 1, Ord. 00-03, eff. February 17, 2000) Section 5.20.04 Permit required.
(a) The sponsor (event sponsor) of an Old Town Special Event shall obtain an Old Town Special Event permit from the City Clerk.

Attachment 4
21 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.
22 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Finance Department
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Finance – Receive and File – Status Report of Development Fee Funds for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021.

ATTACHMENTS: None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

RECOMMENDATION
For the Council to receive and file the report on the status of the development fee funds.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
State law (Government Code Section 66006) requires that local agencies shall make available to the public certain information relative to development impact fees.

BACKGROUND
Per law, the City is providing account information relative to development impact fees.

This information includes the following:

1. A description of the fee.

2. The amount of the fee.

3. The beginning and ending balance of the fee account.

4. The amount of the fee collected and interest earned.

5. Identification of the public improvements for which the fee was expended, the amount of the expenditure and the percentage funded by the fee.

6. The date by which construction will begin if sufficient funds are available.

7. A description of each fund transfer or loan from the account.

8. The amount of refunds made of unexpended funds once all projects for which the fee was imposed are complete.

23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

The City of Clovis has established the following development fees that are collected at various stages of the development process:

1. Sewer Major Facilities Fee

2. Sewer Oversize Acreage Fee

3. Sewer Front Footage Fee

4. Water Major Facilities Fee

5. Water Oversize Acreage Fee

6. Water Front Footage Fee

7. Water Supply Fee

8. Community Sanitation Fee

9. Park Acquisition and Development Fee

10. Major Street Fees
Outside Travel Lane Fee
Center Travel Lane Fee
Traffic Signal Fee
Bridge Fee
Quad Intersection Fee
Underground Overhead Utilities Fee
Street Fee Administration Charge

11. Fire Department Fee

12. Police Department Fee

13. Library Facilities Fee

The following is the required information provided for each of the above fees for fiscal year 2020-21:

1. Sewer Major Facilities Fee: The Sewer Major Facilities Fee is for the construction of the Clovis Sewage Treatment Water Reuse Facility (STWRF) and the capital improvement costs required for upgrading of the Regional Sewer Treatment Plant, as well as debt service payments related to the bond issues to construct the improvements. The fee for 20 20-21 was $7,966 per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). Most of these funds are committed to repayment of Sewer Bonds.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $2,268,536
Plus: Fee Revenue 6,714,435
Interest 21,088

Less: Expenditures 6,335,774
Transfers out: Debt Service 426,000
Transfers out: Projects 270,000
Ending Balance 2020-21 $1,972,285

24 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

2. Sewer Oversize Fee: The Sewer Oversize Fee is for sewer mains greater than 8" in diameter, and/or mains 8" in diameter or greater that are installed deeper than 8', to provide adequate capacity for future development. The fee for 2020- 21 was $1,017 per gross acre. The fee is used to reimburse developers who have installed the lines. Disbursement is made based on the developer’s claim.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $19,314
Plus: Fee Revenue 89,022

Less: Expenditures 28,884
Ending Balance 2020-21 $79,452

3. Sewer Front Footage Fee : The Sewer Front F ootage Fee is for the reimbursement of sewer mains previously installed. The fee for 2020-21 was $19.34 per linear foot. The fee is used to reimburse developers who have installed the lines. Disbursement is made based on the developer’s claim.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $1,462,231
Plus: Fee Revenue 210,226

Less: Expenditures 11,403
Ending Balance 2020-21 $1,661,054

4. Water Major Facilities Fee: The Water Major Facilities Fee is for the construction of water wells, well site acquisitions, well head treatment, auxiliary power systems, reservoirs, surface-water treatment facilities, and debt service payments related to bond issues to construct the improvements. The fee for 2020-21 was $5,114 per unit. The transfer in from the Water Enterprise represents the Enterprise customers’ share of debt service on the surface water treatment plant.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $3,858,924
Plus: Fee Revenue 3,981,369
Interest 70,986
Transfers In – Debt Service 750,000

Less: Expenditures 1,912,677
Ending Balance 2020-21 $6,748,602

5. Water Oversize Fee: The Water Oversize Fee is to provide reimbursement for the oversize cost increment of water mains 12" in diameter or greater than must be installed to insure adequate pressure and volume throughout the system.

The fee for 2020-21 was $1,437 per gross acre. The fee is used to reimburse developers who have installed the lines. Disbursement is made based on the developer’s claim.

25 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $523,590
Plus: Revenue 156,447

Less: Expenditures 14,738
Ending Balance 2020-21 $665,299

6. Water Front Footage Fee: The Water Front Footage Fee is for reimbursement of water mains previously installed. The fee for 2020-21 was $23.41 per linear foot. The fee is used to reimburse developers who have i nstalled the lines.

Disbursement is made based on the developer’s claim.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $2,100,001
Plus: Revenue 348,293

Less: Expenditures 21,125
Ending Balance 2020-21 $2,427,169

7. Water Supply Fee: The Water Supply Fee pays for the cost to acquire additional water supply for properties with development intensities that will exceed the current water entitlement. For properties within the Fresno Irrigation District (FID), the entitlement is 2.1 acre -feet/year. The current cost to acquire annual water supply is $1,250 per acre-foot.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $1,366,683
Plus: Revenue 137,076

Less: Expenditures 0
Ending Balance 2020-21 $1,503,759

8. Community Sanitation Fee: The Community Sanitation Fee is for the purchase of toters, commercial bins, disposal trucks, and street sweeping equipment.

The fee for 2020-21 was $421 per EDU for single family and $238 per EDU for multi-family, commercial, and churches. The fee is transferred to the Refuse Enterprise as purchases are made.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $1,495,169
Plus: Revenue 361,556
Interest 2,341

Less: Expenditures 608
Transfers Out 150,000
Ending Balance 2020-21 $1,708,458

26 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

9. Park Acquisition and Development Fee: The Park Acquisition and Development Fee is for the purchase of parkland and the construction of improvements for regional and community parks. The fee for 2020-21 was $4,260 per EDU.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $8,258,341
Plus: Revenue - Fees 1,615,287
Interest 19,724
Other-Grants 546,352

Less: Expenditures 518,870
Ending Balance 2020-21 $9,920,834

10. Major Street Fees: The Street fees include fees for center travel lane improvements, outside travel la ne improvements, construction of bridges, construction of traffic signals, under -grounding of utilities, quad intersections, and administration. The fees are specific to certain areas within the City based on the infrastructure requirements and developmen t characteristics of the areas.

Outside Travel Lane Fee: The fee is to reimburse developers for Outside Travel Lane improvements that were constructed with their project in excess of the development’s proportionate share.

Center Travel Lane Fee: The fee is to reimburse developers for Center Travel Lane improvements that were constructed with their project, in excess of the development’s proportionate share.

Traffic Signal Fee: The fee is for the reimbursement for the cost to install traffic si gnals either by the City or developers in excess of the development’s proportionate share.

Bridge Fee: The fee is for the reimbursement for the cost to construct bridges and culverts either by the City or developers in excess of the development’s proportionate share.

Quad Intersection Fee: The fee is for the reimbursement for the cost to construct quad intersection improvements either by the City or developers in excess of the development’s proportionate share.

Undergrounding Overhead Utilities: The fee provides a funding source for the City to underground existing overhead utilities or to reimburse developers for the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities in excess of the development’s proportionate share. Under -grounding of existing overhead utilities includes the undergrounding along certain arterial and collector streets.
27 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $9,489,946
Plus: Revenue 3,925,207

Less: Expenditures 1,943,181
Ending Balance 2020-21 $11,471,972

Street Fee Administration Charge : Administrative charges for the administrative work performed by the City staff to collect, track, and reimburse the street fees program has come from interest earnings. Interest earnings has also cover ed applicable interest charges on developer’s reimbursement requests. The fee for 2020-21 is 1.5% of all street fees collected.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $24,095
Plus: Revenue – Fees 72,000
Interest 263,691

Less: Expenditures 440,648
Ending Balance 2020-21 $(80,862)

11. Fire Department Fee: The Fire Department Fee was established in June 1997 to construct, equip, and furnish fire stations. The fee for 2020-21 was $1,331 per EDU.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $990,497
Plus: Revenue 812,339

Less: Expenditures 1,401,830
Ending Balance 2020-21 $401,006

12. Police Department Fee: The Police Department Fee was established in May 2000 for development to contribute to providing police equipment and facilities as community growth requires. The fee for 2020-21 was $746 per EDU.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $404,878
Plus: Revenue 669,500

Less: Expenditures 0
Ending Balance 2020-21 $1,074,378

13. Library Facilities Fee: The Library Facilities Fee was established in April 2008 and became effective July 1, 2008. This fee is to provide a portion of the funding needed to provide library facilities within the City of Clovis. The fee for 2020-21 28 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

was $621 per unit for single -family and $ 508 per unit for multi -family an d assisted living/group homes.

Beginning Balance 2020-21 $1,715,476
Plus: Revenue 577,468

Less: Expenditures 613,822
Ending Balance 2020-21 $1,679,122

FISCAL IMPACT
This report provides a status update of the development fees charged by the City. It provides a good indication of available balances for projects or reimbursements where applicable.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
The fiscal report is for information only and no action is required.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Copies of the report will be made available to any member of the public who requests a copy.

Prepared by: Jeffrey Blanks, Deputy Finance Director

Reviewed by: City Manager JH
29 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Finance Department
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Finance – Receive and File – Investment Report for the Month of September 2021.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Distribution of Investments

2. Monthly Investment Transactions

3. Certificates of Deposit

4. Municipal Securities

5. Graph of September 30, 2021 Treasury Rates

Attached is the Investment Report for the month of September 2021. Shown in Attachment 1 is the distribution of investments which lists all the individual securities owned by the City with the book and market values. Book value is the actual price paid for the investment. Market value is the amount that the investment is worth if sold in the open market. The market value (which fluctuates daily) that is used in the report is as of the last working day of the month.

Attachment 2 reflects the monthly investment transactions for the month of September 2021.

Attachment 3 lists the ce rtificates of deposit. Attachment 4 lists the municipal securities.

Attachment 5 is a graph of Treasury rates on September 30, 2021.

The investment of the City’s funds is performed in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy. Funds are invested with the following objectives in mind:

1. Assets are invested in adherence with the safeguards and diversity of a prudent investor.

2. The portfolio is invested in a manner consistent with the primary emphasis on preservation of the principal, while attaining a high rate of return c onsistent with this guideline. Trading of securities for the sole purpose of realizing trading profits is prohibited.

3. Sufficient liquidity is maintained to provide a source for anticipated financial obligations as they become due.

30 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

4. Investments may be made, consistent with the Investment Policy Guidelines, in fixed income securities maturing in three years or less and can be extended to five years with the City Manager’s approval.

The Finance Department invests the City’s assets with an expectation of achieving a total rate of return at a level that exceeds the annualized rate of return on short -term government guaranteed or insured obligations (90 -day Treasury bills) and to assure that the principal is preserved with minimal risk of depreciation or loss. In periods of rising interest rates, the City of Clovis portfolio return may be less than that of the annualized 90 -day Treasury bill. In periods of decreasing interest rates, the City of Clovis portfolio return may be greater than the annualized 90-day Treasury bill. The current 90-day Treasury bill rate (annualized) is 0.06%.

The rate of return for the City of Clovis portfolio is 0.95%. The goal for the City of Clovis investment return is 120% of the 90-day Treasury bill rate. The current rate of return is 1,588% of the Treasury bill rate.

In accordance with the Investment Policy, the investment period on each investment does not exceed three years and can be extended to five years with the City Manager’s approval. As of September 2021, the average investment life of the City’s investment portfolio is 0.66 years.

Current Investment Environment and Philosophy
During the month of September 2021, the federal funds rate remained at 0.00% -0.25%. On September 30, 2021, the Treasury yield curve increased from 3-month to 10-year notes.

Certificates of Deposit (CD’s)
The City purchases both negotiable and non -negotiable Certificates of Deposit (CD’s).

Although negotiable CD’s can be traded, it is the City’s policy to buy and hold all CD’s.

Negotiable CD’s are held by U.S. Bank, a third party custodian. Non-negotiable CD’s are held in the City’s safe.

Purchases and Maturities
 1 government security totaling $5,000,000 was purchased.  1 government security totaling $2,500,000 matured.
 2 certificates of deposit totaling $500,000 were purchased.  0 certificates of deposit were called or matured.
 0 municipal securities were purchased.

Market Environment
 During September the federal funds rate remained at 0.00%-0.25%.  On September 30 , the yield curve increased from 3 -month to 10 -year notes . See Attachment 5, Graph of Treasury Rates on September 30, 2021.

Prepared by: Jeffrey Blanks, Deputy Finance Director

Reviewed by: City Manager __AH__

31 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

STATED

DAYS TO

MATURITY

NET BOOK MARKET YIELD TO INTEREST INVEST MATURIT Y FROM COST VALUE VALUE * MATURIT Y RATE DATE DATE 9/30/2021

GOV'T SECURITIES
FFCB 2,500,200 2,500,040 2,514,300 2.800% 2.800% 12/17/18 12/17/21 78 FAMCMTN 2,999,400 2,999,800 3,011,790 1.520% 1.520% 01/23/20 01/10/22 102 FHLMCMTN 6,129,600 6,036,212 6,039,240 2.375% 2.375% 08/30/19 01/13/22 105 FHLB 12,110,520 12,031,468 12,131,040 2.500% 2.500% 04/25/19 03/11/22 162 FFCB 5,979,668 5,965,675 6,024,368 2.280% 2.280% 03/28/19 03/28/22 179 FFCB 6,017,400 6,006,333 6,076,560 1.875% 1.875% 06/27/19 06/14/22 257 FAMCMTN 6,024,900 6,009,409 6,081,300 1.950% 1.950% 07/25/19 06/21/22 264 FFCB 3,005,250 3,002,434 3,041,520 1.625% 1.625% 11/27/19 08/22/22 326 FHLB 6,065,100 6,030,009 6,107,700 2.000% 2.000% 10/31/19 09/09/22 344 FFCB 2,984,460 2,992,397 3,039,450 1.375% 1.375% 11/27/19 10/11/22 376 FFCB 5,008,500 5,004,405 5,077,500 1.600% 1.600% 01/23/20 10/13/22 378 FHLB 8,045,600 8,024,028 6,633,315 1.875% 1.875% 12/19/19 12/09/22 435 FHLB 5,047,500 5,025,864 6,633,315 1.875% 1.875% 01/23/20 12/09/22 435 FAMCMTN 8,544,965 8,526,759 8,636,340 1.350% 1.350% 02/27/20 02/27/23 515 FHLB 5,255,000 13,356,397 13,335,887 2.125% 2.125% 03/26/20 03/10/23 526 FHLB 13,579,800 5,162,000 5,154,073 2.125% 2.125% 04/30/20 03/10/23 526 FFCB 5,000,000 5,000,000 4,982,500 0.250% 0.250% 03/01/21 03/01/24 883 FFCB 1,999,000 1,999,048 1,992,820 0.300% 0.300% 03/24/21 03/18/24 900 FHLB 5,000,000 5,000,000 4,993,450 0.350% 0.350% 06/07/21 06/07/24 981 FHLB 4,963,000 4,963,526 4,918,000 0.580% 0.580% 09/08/21 02/11/26 1,595 SECURITIES TOTAL 116,259,863$ 115,635,804 $ $116,424,468 LAIF 74,364,940$ 74,364,940 $
Municipal Issuance 5,900,000$ 5,897,353 $
Sweep Account (Union Bank) 45,529,596$ 45,529,596 $ TOTAL CD'S 10,485,000$ 10,597,638 $
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 251,915,340$ 252,813,995 $
* Market values for securities obtained from US Bank.

City of Clovis
Distribution of Investments
As of September 30, 2021
ATTACHMENT 1
32 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

Activity Maturity
Institution Description Activit y Amount Market Value Rate Date Date FHLB Gov Sec. Purchase 5,000,000 4,963,000 0.580% 09/08/21 02/11/26 FFCB Gov Sec. Maturity 2,500,000 2,498,732 2.850% 09/20/21 09/20/21 Toyota Finl Svgs CD Purchase 250,000 250,000 0.650% 09/09/21 09/09/24 State Bk India CD Purchase 250,000 250,000 0.650% 09/17/21 09/17/24

PORTFOLIO DATA
Current Month (09/21)
Book Market
CD'S 10,485,000 $ 10,597,638 $
Gov't Securities* 115,635,804 116,424,468
Municipal Securities 5,900,000 5,897,353
LAIF 74,364,940 74,364,940
Sweep Account (Union Bank) 45,529,596 45,529,596
TOTAL 251,915,340 $ 252,813,995 $
Prior Month (08/21)
Three Months Previous (06/21)
Book Market Book Market
CD'S 9,985,000 $ 10,105,425 $ CD'S 9,735,000 $ 9,895,144 $ Gov't Securities* 113,200,490 114,200,064 Gov't Securities* 118,200,318 119,447,117 Municipal Securities 5,900,000 5,904,479 Municipal Securities 5,900,000 5,895,418 LAIF 74,364,940 74,364,940 LAIF 74,304,273 74,304,273
Sweep Account (Union Bank) 51,435,559 51,435,559 Sweep Account (Union Bank) 66,437,811 66,437,811 TOTAL 254,885,989 $ 256,010,467 $ TOTAL 274,577,402 $ 275,979,763 $ Six Months Previous (03/21)
One Year Previous (09/20)
Book Market Book Market
CD'S 10,740,000 $ 10,944,973 $ CD'S 9,990,000 $ 10,306,545 $ Gov't Securities* 118,233,898 120,009,580 Gov't Securities* 114,096,254 116,576,948 Municipal Securities 4,900,000 4,898,515 Municipal Securities 500,000 499,855 LAIF 74,223,185 74,223,185 LAIF 73,948,977 73,948,977
Sweep Account (Union Bank) 34,616,537 34,616,537 Sweep Account (Union Bank) 25,177,022 25,177,022 TOTAL 242,713,620 $ 244,692,790 $ TOTAL 223,712,253 $ 226,509,347 $ *Adjusted Quarterly for Premium/Discount Amortization
As of September 30, 2021
Monthly Investment Transactions
City of Clovis
ATTACHMENT 2
33 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

MARKET INTEREST INVEST MATURITY MATURITY FROM INTEREST
Negotiable CDs COST PRICE RATE DATE DATE 09/30/21 FREQUENCY Ubs Bank Usa 250,000 250,817.50 3.200% 11/07/18 11/08/21 39 MONTHLY Mountain America Fd Credit 250,000 250,970.00 3.200% 11/15/18 11/15/21 46 MONTHLY Wells Fargo 250,000 252,175.00 3.000% 01/18/19 01/18/22 110 MONTHLY Goldman Sachs Bk USA Ny 245,000 247,663.15 2.800% 02/20/19 02/22/22 145 QUARTERLY Tiaa FSB Jacksonville Fla 245, 000 247,712.15 2.850% 02/28/19 02/22/22 145 QUARTERLY Comenity Capital Bank 250,000 253,587.50 2.550% 04/30/19 04/29/22 211 QUARTERLY Synchrony Bank 250,000 253,745.00 2.450% 05/17/19 05/17/22 229 QUARTERLY First State Bank of Dequeen 250,000 253, 145.00 2.000% 07/26/19 05/26/22 238 QUARTERLY Flagstar Bank 250,000 254,275.00 2.500% 06/12/19 06/13/22 256 QUARTERLY Capital One Bank 250,000 254,127.50 2.350% 06/19/19 06/20/22 263 QUARTERLY Morgan Stanley Bk 250,000 254,162.50 2.100% 07/25/19 07/25/22 298 QUARTERLY Capital One Ntnl Assn 250,000 254,455.00 2.150% 08/07/19 08/08/22 312 QUARTERLY Everbanke USA Salt Lake City 250,000 254,237.50 2.050% 08/07/19 08/08/22 312 QUARTERLY Raymond James Bank 250,000 254,090.00 1.900% 08/23/19 08/23/22 327 QUARTERLY Ally Bank 250,000 254,245.00 1.850% 09/19/19 09/19/22 354 QUARTERLY Usalliance Federal Credit Union 250,000 254,605.00 2.850% 09/30/19 09/30/22 365 QUARTERLY Morgan Stanley Bank 250,000 254,527.50 2.100% 10/17/19 10/17/22 382 MONTHLY Lafayette Fed Cr Un 250,000 254,447.50 1.700% 11/22/19 11/22/22 418 MONTHLY Live Oak Banking Co. 250,000 254,770.00 1.750% 12/11/19 12/12/22 438 QUARTERLY Wells Fargo Natl Bk West 250,000 254,930.00 1.800% 12/13/19 12/13/22 439 QUARTERLY Valley Cent Svgs Bk 250,000 254,910.00 1.700% 01/15/20 01/17/23 474 QUARTERLY Sallie Mae Bank 250,000 255,637.50 1.900% 01/23/20 01/23/23 480 QUARTERLY Servisfirst Bank 250,000 254,835.00 1.600% 02/21/20 02/21/23 509 MONTHLY Celtic Bank 250,000 254,812.50 1.550% 03/13/20 03/13/23 529 MONTHLY Axos Bank 250,000 254,905.00 1.550% 03/26/20 03/27/23 543 MONTHLY Nicolet Natl Bank 250,000 253,045.00 0.900% 03/27/20 03/27/23 543 MONTHLY Centerstate Bank 250,000 252,505.00 0.900% 03/30/20 03/30/23 546 MONTHLY Bank Leumi 250,000 254,562.50 1.450% 03/31/20 03/31/23 547 MONTHLY Discover Bank 250,000 254,562.50 1.350% 04/02/20 04/03/23 550 MONTHLY Berkshire Bank 250,000 254,027.50 1.300% 04/08/20 04/06/23 553 MONTHLY American Express 250,000 253,302.50 1.100% 04/21/20 04/21/23 568 MONTHLY New York Cmnty Bank 250,000 249,615.00 0.350% 12/11/20 12/11/23 802 QUARTERLY Transportation Alliance Bk 250,000 248,525.00 0.250% 03/12/21 03/12/24 894 QUARTERLY Investors Cmnty Bk 250,000 249,367.50 0.400% 03/24/21 03/25/24 907 QUARTERLY Preferred Bank 250,000 248,442.50 0.250% 03/25/21 03/25/24 907 QUARTERLY Bankunited Natl Assn 245,000 244,647.20 0.450% 03/31/21 04/01/24 914 QUARTERLY Greenstate Credit Union 250,000 249,205.00 0.450% 06/16/21 06/17/24 991 QUARTERLY Eaglemark Savings Bank 250,000 248,795.00 0.400% 06/30/21 06/28/24 1,002 QUARTERLY Texas Exchange Bk 250,000 249,415.00 0.500% 07/09/21 07/09/24 1,013 QUARTERLY BMW Bk North Amer 250,000 249,637.50 0.550% 07/30/21 07/30/24 1,034 QUARTERLY Toyota Finl Svgs 250,000 250,120.00 0.650% 09/09/21 09/09/24 1,075 QUARTERLY State Bk India 250,000 250,075.00 0. 650% 09/17/21 09/17/24 1,083 QUARTERLY Negotiable CD TOTAL 10,485,000$ 10,597,638 $
CD TOTAL 10,485,000$ 10,597,638 $
City of Clovis
Certificates of Deposit
As of September 30, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
34 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

MARKET INTEREST INVEST MATURITY MATURITY FROM INTEREST
Municipal Securities COST PRICE RATE DATE DATE 09/30/21 FREQUENCY Huntington Beach Calif Pension Bond 1,000, 000 998,410.00 0.381% 04/01/21 06/15/23 623 QUARTERLY Fresno Unified Taxable Go Ref Bond 500,000 500,250.00 0.462% 09/30/20 08/01/23 670 QUARTERLY Pomona Cali Uni Sch Dist Go Bond 815,000 815,138.55 0.534% 10/20/20 08/01/23 670 QUARTERLY San Jose CA USD Ref Bond 775,000 773,961.50 0.221% 01/20/21 08/01/23 670 QUARTERLY Vista CA USD Ref Bond 750,000 750,577.50 0.221% 01/20/21 08/01/23 670 QUARTERLY William Hart Cali HS Go Bond 1,000,000 998,210.00 0.366% 12/23/20 08/01/23 670 QUARTERLY Jefferson Cali Elem Sch Dist Go Bond 710,000 709,787.00 0.399% 10/27/20 09/01/23 701 QUARTERLY Santa Rosa Calif Watr Ref Bond 350,000 351,018.50 0.578% 12/01/20 09/01/23 701 QUARTERLY Mun. Securities TOTAL 5,900,000$ 5,897,353 $
Municipal Securities TOTAL 5,900,000$ 5,897,353 $
City of Clovis
Municipal Securities
As of September 30, 2021
ATTACHMENT 4
35 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

Treasury Rates as of September 30, 2021
3 month Treasury bill 0.04
6 month Treasury bill 0.05
2 Yr Treasury note 0.28
3 Yr Treasury note 0.53
5 Yr Treasury note 0.98
10 Yr Treasury note 1.52

CITY OF CLOVIS

FINANCE DEPARTMENT
SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 TREASURY RATES
As indicated in the above graph, treasuries increase from 3-month to 10-year notes. 0 0.5
1 1.5
2 2.5
3 3.5
4 3 month
Treasury bill
6 month
Treasury bill
2 Yr Treasury
note
3 Yr Treasury
note
5 Yr Treasury
note
10 Yr
Treasury note

INTEREST RATES

TREASURIES
TREASURY RATES ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2021
ATTACHMENT 5
36 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Finance Department
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Finance – Receive and File – Treasurer’s Report for the Month of September 2021.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Summary of Cash Balances

2. Summary of Investment Activity

3. Investments with Original Maturities Exceeding One Year

Attached for the Council’s information is the Treasurer’s Report for the month ended September 30, 2021.

Pursuant to Section 41004 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City Treasurer is required to submit a monthly report of all receipts, disbursements, and fund balances.

Attachment 1 provides a summary of the beginning balance, total receipts, total disbursements, ending balance for all funds, and a listing, by fund, of all month end fund balances. Attachment 2 summarizes the investment activity for the month and distribution, by type of investment, held by the City. Attachment 3 lists all investments with original maturities exceeding one year as of the month ended September 30, 2021.

Prepared by: Jeffrey Blanks, Deputy Finance Director

Reviewed by: City Manager __AH__

37 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.

Previous Balance 4,994,486.18$
Deposits 26,190,092.90
Disbursements (28,889,036.66)
Current Balance 2,295,542.42$

FUNDS BALANCE
100 General Fund 1,516,390.93 $
201 Local Transportation 17,303,627.62
202 Parking and Business Improvements 106,521.22
203 Off Highway Use 70,687.87
204 Off Highway Use 52,272.24
205 Senior Citizen Memorial Trust 54,710.67
207 Landscape Assessment District 5,385,307.77
208 Blackhorse III (95-1) Assessment District 103,445.09 301 Park & Recreation Acquisition 9,924,060.09
305 Refuse Equipment Reserve 1,755,750.31
310 Special Street Deposit Fund 31,160,006.19
313 Successor Agency 575,356.38
314 Housing Successor Agency 1,344,270.26
402 1976 Fire Bond Redemption 25,475.23
404 1976 Sewer Bond Redemption Fund 407,926.26
501 Community Sanitation Fund 15,617,518.71
502 Sewer Service Fund 34,625,417.99
504 Sewer Capital Projects-Users 1,216,653.45
506 Sewer Capital Projects-Developer 2,051,494.10
507 Water Service Fund 49,579,413.65
508 Water Capital Projects-Users 6,637,309.76
509 Water Capital Projects-Developer 8,088,746.75
515 Transit Fund 1,350,145.85
540 Planning & Development Services 16,668,444.94
601 Property & Liability Insurance 480,877.92
602 Fleet Maintenance 19,291,185.17
603 Employee Benefit Fund 2,706,193.04
604 General Government Services 25,076,097.65
701 Curb & Gutter Fund 161,252.45
703 Payroll Tax & Withholding Fund 1,315,226.30
712 Temperance/Barstow Assmt Dist (98-1) 76,102.01 713 Shepherd/Temperance Assmt Dist (2000-1) 5,757.27 715 Supp Law Enforcement Serv 771.15
716 Asset Forfeiture 172,998.44
720 Measure A-Public Safety Facility Tax 412.90
736 SA Admin Trust Fund 1,421.40
741 SA Debt Service Trust Fund (699,505.61)
747 Housing Successor Trust Fund 1,137.98
SUBTOTALS 254,210,881.40$
999 Invested Funds (251,915,338.98)
TOTAL 2,295,542.42$
Statement of Cash Balances
As of September 30, 2021
City of Clovis
ATTACHMENT 1
38 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.

Balance of Investments Previous Month End $254,885,988.14 Time Certificates of Deposit Transactions
Investments 500,000.00
Withdrawals 0.00
Total CD Changes 500,000.00
Other Changes
Government Securities 2,435,314.00
Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00
Municipal Securities 0.00
Sweep Account (5,905,963.16)
Total Other Changes (3,470,649.16)
Balance of Investments Current Month End 251,915,338.98$ Insured CD's 10,485,000.00
Government Securities 115,635,803.25
US Treasury Notes 0.00
Local Agency Investment Fund 74,364,939.94
Municipal Securities 5,900,000.00
Sweep Account 45,529,595.79
Investment Total 251,915,338.98$
Distribution of Investments
As of September 30, 2021
City of Clovis
Summary of Investment Activity
For the month of September 30, 2021
City of Clovis
ATTACHMENT 2
39 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.

Investment
Balance At Stated
Institution Face Value Amortized Cost Maturity Rate
FFCB 2,500,000.00 2,500,040.00 12/17/2021 2.800%
FAMCMTN 3,000,000.00 2,999,800.00 1/10/2022 1.520%
FHLMCMTN 6,000,000.00 6,036,212.00 1/13/2022 2.375%
FHLB 12,000,000.00 12,031,468.00 3/11/2022 2.500%
FFCB 5,960,000.00 5,965,675.00 3/28/2022 2.280%
FFCB 6,000,000.00 6,006,333.00 6/14/2022 1.875%
FAMCMTN 6,000,000.00 6,009,409.00 6/21/2022 1.950%
FFCB 3,000,000.00 3,002,434.00 8/22/2022 1.625%
FHLB 6,000,000.00 6,030,009.00 9/9/2022 2.000%
FFCB 3,000,000.00 2,992,397.00 10/11/2022 1.375%
FFCB 5,000,000.00 5,004,405.00 10/13/2022 1.600%
FHLB 5,000,000.00 5,025,864.00 12/9/2022 1.875%
FHLB 8,000,000.00 8,024,028.00 12/9/2022 1.875%
FAMCMTN 8,500,000.00 8,526,759.00 2/27/2023 1.350%
FHLB 13,000,000.00 5,162,000.00 3/10/2023 2.125%
FHLB 5,000,000.00 13,356,397.00 3/10/2023 2.125%
FFCB 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 3/1/2024 0.250%
FFCB 2,000,000.00 1,999,048.00 3/18/2024 0.300%
FHLB 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 6/7/2024 0.350%
FHLB 5,000,000.00 4,963,526.00 2/11/2026 0.580%
Original Maturities Exceeding One Year
As of September 30, 2021
City of Clovis
ATTACHMENT 3
40 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Finance Department
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Finance – Receive and File – Investment Report for the Month of October 2021.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Distribution of Investments

2. Monthly Investment Transactions

3. Certificates of Deposit

4. Municipal Securities

5. Graph of October 31, 2021 Treasury Rates

Attached is the Investment Report for the month of October 2021. Shown in Attachment 1 is the distribution of investments which lists all the individual securities owned by the City with the book and market values. Book value is the actual price paid for the investment. Market value is the amount that the investment is worth if sold in the open market. The market value (which fluctuates daily) that is used in the report is as of the last working day of the month.

Attachment 2 reflects the monthly investment transactions for the month of October 2021.

Attachment 3 lists the certific ates of deposit. Attachment 4 lists the municipal securities.

Attachment 5 is a graph of Treasury rates on October 31, 2021.

The investment of the City’s funds is performed in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy. Funds are invested with the following objectives in mind:

1. Assets are invested in adherence with the safeguards and diversity of a prudent investor.

2. The portfolio is invested in a manner consistent with the primary emphasis on preservation of the principal, while attaining a high rate of return c onsistent with this guideline. Trading of securities for the sole purpose of realizing trading profits is prohibited.

3. Sufficient liquidity is maintained to provide a source for anticipated financial obligations as they become due.

41 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.

4. Investments may be made, consistent with the Investment Policy Guidelines, in fixed income securities maturing in three years or less and can be extended to five years with the City Manager’s approval.

The Finance Department invests the City’s assets with an expectation of achieving a total rate of return at a level that exceeds the annualized rate of return on short -term government guaranteed or insured obligations (90 -day Treasury bills) and to assure that the principal is preserved with minimal risk of depreciation or loss. In periods of rising interest rates, the City of Clovis portfolio return may be less than that of the annualized 9 0-day Treasury bill. In periods of decreasing interest rates, the City of Clovis portfolio return may be greater than the annualized 90-day Treasury bill. The current 90-day Treasury bill rate (annualized) is 0.05%.

The rate of return for the City of Cl ovis portfolio is 0.96%. The goal for the City of Clovis investment return is 120% of the 90-day Treasury bill rate. The current rate of return is 1,927% of the Treasury bill rate.

In accordance with the Investment Policy, the investment period on each investment does not exceed three years and can be extended to five years with the City Manager’s approval. As of October 2021, the average investment life of the City’s investment portfolio is 0.79 years.

Current Investment Environment and Philosophy
During the month of October 2021, the federal funds rate remained at 0.00% -0.25%. On October 31, 2021, the Treasury yield curve increased from 3-month to 10-year notes.

Certificates of Deposit (CD’s)
The City purchases both negotiable and non -negotiable Cert ificates of Deposit (CD’s).

Although negotiable CD’s can be traded, it is the City’s policy to buy and hold all CD’s.

Negotiable CD’s are held by U.S. Bank, a third party custodian. Non-negotiable CD’s are held in the City’s safe.

Purchases and Maturities
 2 government securities totaling $10,000,000 were purchased.  0 government securities were called or matured.
 0 certificates of deposit were purchased.
 0 certificates of deposit were called or matured.
 0 municipal securities were purchased.

Market Environment
 During October the federal funds rate remained at 0.00%-0.25%.  On October 31, the yield curve increased from 3-month to 10-year notes. See Attachment 5, Graph of Treasury Rates on October 31, 2021.

Prepared by: Jeffrey Blanks, Deputy Finance Director

Reviewed by: City Manager _AH__

42 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.

STATED

DAYS TO

MATURITY

NET BOOK MARKET YIELD TO INTEREST INVEST MATURIT Y FROM COST VALUE VALUE * MATURIT Y RATE DATE DATE 10/31/2021

GOV'T SECURITIES
FFCB 2,500,200 2,500,040 2,508,600 2.800% 2.800% 12/17/18 12/17/21 47 FAMCMTN 2,999,400 2,999,800 3,008,070 1.520% 1.520% 01/23/20 01/10/22 71 FHLMCMTN 6,129,600 6,036,212 6,026,580 2.375% 2.375% 08/30/19 01/13/22 74 FHLB 12,110,520 12,031,468 12,103,800 2.500% 2.500% 04/25/19 03/11/22 131 FFCB 5,979,668 5,965,675 6,012,627 2.280% 2.280% 03/28/19 03/28/22 148 FFCB 6,017,400 6,006,333 6,065,160 1.875% 1.875% 06/27/19 06/14/22 226 FAMCMTN 6,024,900 6,009,409 6,070,560 1.950% 1.950% 07/25/19 06/21/22 233 FFCB 3,005,250 3,002,434 3,036,300 1.625% 1.625% 11/27/19 08/22/22 295 FHLB 6,065,100 6,030,009 6,096,300 2.000% 2.000% 10/31/19 09/09/22 313 FFCB 2,984,460 2,992,397 3,034,800 1.375% 1.375% 11/27/19 10/11/22 345 FFCB 5,008,500 5,004,405 5,067,500 1.600% 1.600% 01/23/20 10/13/22 347 FHLB 8,045,600 8,024,028 6,617,585 1.875% 1.875% 12/19/19 12/09/22 404 FHLB 5,047,500 5,025,864 6,617,585 1.875% 1.875% 01/23/20 12/09/22 404 FAMCMTN 8,544,965 8,526,759 8,615,600 1.350% 1.350% 02/27/20 02/27/23 484 FHLB 5,255,000 13,356,397 13,301,094 2.125% 2.125% 03/26/20 03/10/23 495 FHLB 13,579,800 5,162,000 5,140,626 2.125% 2.125% 04/30/20 03/10/23 495 FFCB 5,000,000 5,000,000 4,972,150 0.250% 0.250% 03/01/21 03/01/24 852 FFCB 1,999,000 1,999,048 1,982,960 0.300% 0.300% 03/24/21 03/18/24 869 FHLB 5,000,000 5,000,000 4,972,250 0.350% 0.350% 06/07/21 06/07/24 950 FAMCMTN 4,948,500 4,948,500 4,926,800 0.600% 0.600% 10/14/21 09/08/25 1,408 FHLB 4,963,000 4,963,526 4,882,050 0.580% 0.580% 09/08/21 02/11/26 1,564 FFCB 4,967,500 4,967,500 4,928,050 0.940% 0.940% 10/14/21 09/28/26 1,793 SECURITIES TOTAL 126,175,863$ 125,551,804 $ $125,987,047 LAIF 74,410,223$ 74,410,223 $
Municipal Issuance 5,900,000$ 5,880,960 $
Sweep Account (Union Bank) 34,467,569$ 34,467,569 $ TOTAL CD'S 10,485,000$ 10,576,750 $
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 250,814,596$ 251,322,549 $
* Market values for securities obtained from US Bank.

City of Clovis
Distribution of Investments
As of October 31, 2021
ATTACHMENT 1
43 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.

Activity Maturity
Institution Description Activit y Amount Market Value Rate Date Date FAMCMTN Gov Sec. Purchase 5,000,000 4,948,500 0.600% 10/14/21 09/08/25 FFCB Gov Sec. Purchase 5,000,000 4,967,500 0.940% 10/14/21 09/28/26

PORTFOLIO DATA
Current Month (10/21)
Book Market
CD'S 10,485,000 $ 10,576,750 $
Gov't Securities* 125,551,804 125,987,047
Municipal Securities 5,900,000 5,880,960
LAIF 74,410,223 74,410,223
Sweep Account (Union Bank) 34,467,569 34,467,569
TOTAL 250,814,596 $ 251,322,549 $
Prior Month (09/21)
Three Months Previous (07/21)
Book Market Book Market
CD'S 10,485,000 $ 10,597,638 $ CD'S 10,235,000 $ 10,372,581 $ Gov't Securities* 115,635,804 116,424,468 Gov't Securities* 118,200,318 119,368,101 Municipal Securities 5,900,000 5,897,353 Municipal Securities 5,900,000 5,904,708 LAIF 74,364,940 74,364,940 LAIF 74,364,940 74,364,940
Sweep Account (Union Bank) 45,529,596 45,529,596 Sweep Account (Union Bank) 45,219,191 45,219,191 TOTAL 251,915,340 $ 252,813,995 $ TOTAL 253,919,449 $ 255,229,521 $ Six Months Previous (04/21)
One Year Previous (10/20)
Book Market Book Market
CD'S 10,485,000 $ 10,677,177 $ CD'S 9,990,000 $ 10,278,669 $ Gov't Securities* 115,733,857 117,344,003 Gov't Securities* 114,096,254 116,371,092 Municipal Securities 5,900,000 5,898,883 Municipal Securities 2,025,000 2,022,630 LAIF 74,304,273 74,304,273 LAIF 74,106,014 74,106,014
Sweep Account (Union Bank) 45,578,631 45,578,631 Sweep Account (Union Bank) 24,081,485 24,081,485 TOTAL 252,001,761 $ 253,802,967 $ TOTAL 224,298,753 $ 226,859,890 $ *Adjusted Quarterly for Premium/Discount Amortization
As of October 31, 2021
Monthly Investment Transactions
City of Clovis
ATTACHMENT 2
44 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.

MARKET INTEREST INVEST MATURITY MATURITY FROM INTEREST
Negotiable CDs COST PRICE RATE DATE DATE 10/31/21 FREQUENCY Ubs Bank Usa 250,000 250,217.50 3.200% 11/07/18 11/08/21 8 MONTHLY Mountain America Fd Credit 250,000 250,370.00 3.200% 11/15/18 11/15/21 15 MONTHLY Wells Fargo 250,000 251,625.00 3.000% 01/18/19 01/18/22 79 MONTHLY Goldman Sachs Bk USA Ny 245,000 247,141.30 2.800% 02/20/19 02/22/22 114 QUARTERLY Tiaa FSB Jacksonville Fla 245, 000 247,180.50 2.850% 02/28/19 02/22/22 114 QUARTERLY Comenity Capital Bank 250,000 253,077.50 2.550% 04/30/19 04/29/22 180 QUARTERLY Synchrony Bank 250,000 253,245.00 2.450% 05/17/19 05/17/22 198 QUARTERLY First State Bank of Dequeen 250,000 252, 742.50 2.000% 07/26/19 05/26/22 207 QUARTERLY Flagstar Bank 250,000 253,747.50 2.500% 06/12/19 06/13/22 225 QUARTERLY Capital One Bank 250,000 253,622.50 2.350% 06/19/19 06/20/22 232 QUARTERLY Morgan Stanley Bk 250,000 253,720.00 2.100% 07/25/19 07/25/22 267 QUARTERLY Capital One Ntnl Assn 250,000 253,990.00 2.150% 08/07/19 08/08/22 281 QUARTERLY Everbanke USA Salt Lake City 250,000 253,792.50 2.050% 08/07/19 08/08/22 281 QUARTERLY Raymond James Bank 250,000 253,660.00 1.900% 08/23/19 08/23/22 296 QUARTERLY Ally Bank 250,000 253,790.00 1.850% 09/19/19 09/19/22 323 QUARTERLY Usalliance Federal Credit Union 250,000 254,117.50 2.850% 09/30/19 09/30/22 334 QUARTERLY Morgan Stanley Bank 250,000 254,072.50 2.100% 10/17/19 10/17/22 351 MONTHLY Lafayette Fed Cr Un 250,000 253,987.50 1.700% 11/22/19 11/22/22 387 MONTHLY Live Oak Banking Co. 250,000 254,290.00 1.750% 12/11/19 12/12/22 407 QUARTERLY Wells Fargo Natl Bk West 250,000 254,437.50 1.800% 12/13/19 12/13/22 408 QUARTERLY Valley Cent Svgs Bk 250,000 254,417.50 1.700% 01/15/20 01/17/23 443 QUARTERLY Sallie Mae Bank 250,000 255,087.50 1.900% 01/23/20 01/23/23 449 QUARTERLY Servisfirst Bank 250,000 254,335.00 1.600% 02/21/20 02/21/23 478 MONTHLY Celtic Bank 250,000 254,307.50 1.550% 03/13/20 03/13/23 498 MONTHLY Axos Bank 250,000 254,390.00 1.550% 03/26/20 03/27/23 512 MONTHLY Nicolet Natl Bank 250,000 252,625.00 0.900% 03/27/20 03/27/23 512 MONTHLY Centerstate Bank 250,000 252,107.50 0.900% 03/30/20 03/30/23 515 MONTHLY Bank Leumi 250,000 254,052.50 1.450% 03/31/20 03/31/23 516 MONTHLY Discover Bank 250,000 254,067.50 1.350% 04/02/20 04/03/23 519 MONTHLY Berkshire Bank 250,000 253,557.50 1.300% 04/08/20 04/06/23 522 MONTHLY American Express 250,000 252,860.00 1.100% 04/21/20 04/21/23 537 MONTHLY New York Cmnty Bank 250,000 249,135.00 0.350% 12/11/20 12/11/23 771 QUARTERLY Transportation Alliance Bk 250,000 248,047.50 0.250% 03/12/21 03/12/24 863 QUARTERLY Investors Cmnty Bk 250,000 248,860.00 0.400% 03/24/21 03/25/24 876 QUARTERLY Preferred Bank 250,000 247,962.50 0.250% 03/25/21 03/25/24 876 QUARTERLY Bankunited Natl Assn 245,000 244,132.70 0.450% 03/31/21 04/01/24 883 QUARTERLY Greenstate Credit Union 250,000 248,680.00 0.450% 06/16/21 06/17/24 960 QUARTERLY Eaglemark Savings Bank 250,000 248,277.50 0.400% 06/30/21 06/28/24 971 QUARTERLY Texas Exchange Bk 250,000 248,877.50 0.500% 07/09/21 07/09/24 982 QUARTERLY BMW Bk North Amer 250,000 249,087.50 0.550% 07/30/21 07/30/24 1,003 QUARTERLY Toyota Finl Svgs 250,000 249,550.00 0.650% 09/09/21 09/09/24 1,044 QUARTERLY State Bk India 250,000 249,505.00 0. 650% 09/17/21 09/17/24 1,052 QUARTERLY Negotiable CD TOTAL 10,485,000$ 10,576,750 $
CD TOTAL 10,485,000$ 10,576,750 $
City of Clovis
Certificates of Deposit
As of October 31, 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
45 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.

MARKET INTEREST INVEST MATURITY MATURITY FROM INTEREST
Municipal Securities COST PRICE RATE DATE DATE 10/31/21 FREQUENCY Huntington Beach Calif Pension Bond 1,000, 000 995,460.00 0.381% 04/01/21 06/15/23 592 QUARTERLY Fresno Unified Taxable Go Ref Bond 500,000 498,885.00 0.462% 09/30/20 08/01/23 639 QUARTERLY Pomona Cali Uni Sch Dist Go Bond 815,000 813,924.20 0.534% 10/20/20 08/01/23 639 QUARTERLY San Jose CA USD Ref Bond 775,000 772,047.25 0.221% 01/20/21 08/01/23 639 QUARTERLY Vista CA USD Ref Bond 750,000 747,487.50 0.221% 01/20/21 08/01/23 639 QUARTERLY William Hart Cali HS Go Bond 1,000,000 995,590.00 0.366% 12/23/20 08/01/23 639 QUARTERLY Jefferson Cali Elem Sch Dist Go Bond 710,000 707,649.90 0.399% 10/27/20 09/01/23 670 QUARTERLY Santa Rosa Calif Watr Ref Bond 350,000 349,916.00 0.578% 12/01/20 09/01/23 670 QUARTERLY Mun. Securities TOTAL 5,900,000$ 5,880,960 $
Municipal Securities TOTAL 5,900,000$ 5,880,960 $
City of Clovis
Municipal Securities
As of October 31, 2021
ATTACHMENT 4
46 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.

Treasury Rates as of October 31, 2021
3 month Treasury bill 0.05
6 month Treasury bill 0.07
2 Yr Treasury note 0.48
3 Yr Treasury note 0.75
5 Yr Treasury note 1.18
10 Yr Treasury note 1.55

CITY OF CLOVIS

FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OCTOBER 31, 2021 TREASURY RATES
As indicated in the above graph, treasuries increase from 3-month to 10-year notes. 0 0.5
1 1.5
2 2.5
3 3.5
4 3 month
Treasury bill
6 month
Treasury bill
2 Yr Treasury
note
3 Yr Treasury
note
5 Yr Treasury
note
10 Yr
Treasury note

INTEREST RATES

TREASURIES
TREASURY RATES ON OCTOBER 31, 2021
ATTACHMENT 5
47 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Finance Department
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Finance – Receive and File – Treasurer’s Report for the Month of October 2021.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Summary of Cash Balances

2. Summary of Investment Activity

3. Investments with Original Maturities Exceeding One Year

Attached for the Council’s information is the Treasurer’s Report for the month ended October 31, 2021.

Pursuant to Section 41004 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City Treasurer is required to submit a monthly report of all receipts, disbursements, and fund balances.

Attachment 1 provides a summary of the beginning balance, total receipts, total disbursements, ending balance for all funds, and a listing, by fund, of all month end fund balances. Attachment 2 summarizes the investment activity for the month and distribution, by type of investment, held by the City. Attachment 3 lists all investments with original maturities exceeding one year as of the month ended October 31, 2021.

Prepared by: Jeffrey Blanks, Deputy Finance Director

Reviewed by: City Manager __AH__

48 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.

Previous Balance 2,295,542.42$
Deposits 35,101,073.51
Disbursements (32,371,561.62)
Current Balance 5,025,054.31$

FUNDS BALANCE
100 General Fund 146,396.53 $
201 Local Transportation 16,002,339.18
202 Parking and Business Improvements 106,599.07
203 Off Highway Use 70,723.09
204 Off Highway Use 46,572.24
205 Senior Citizen Memorial Trust 54,737.84
207 Landscape Assessment District 5,037,549.94
208 Blackhorse III (95-1) Assessment District 95,820.52 301 Park & Recreation Acquisition 10,431,464.63
305 Refuse Equipment Reserve 1,789,990.28
310 Special Street Deposit Fund 32,089,608.14
313 Successor Agency 461,943.10
314 Housing Successor Agency 1,342,915.83
402 1976 Fire Bond Redemption 25,475.23
404 1976 Sewer Bond Redemption Fund 408,139.86
501 Community Sanitation Fund 15,463,330.93
502 Sewer Service Fund 34,362,014.06
504 Sewer Capital Projects-Users 1,226,765.12
506 Sewer Capital Projects-Developer 3,214,693.75
507 Water Service Fund 49,477,755.23
508 Water Capital Projects-Users 6,673,765.84
509 Water Capital Projects-Developer 8,823,052.99
515 Transit Fund 1,171,635.35
540 Planning & Development Services 16,489,795.32
601 Property & Liability Insurance 781,676.25
602 Fleet Maintenance 19,519,504.14
603 Employee Benefit Fund 3,994,443.72
604 General Government Services 25,330,846.55
701 Curb & Gutter Fund 161,332.28
703 Payroll Tax & Withholding Fund 1,254,456.49
712 Temperance/Barstow Assmt Dist (98-1) 76,139.50 713 Shepherd/Temperance Assmt Dist (2000-1) 5,760.30 715 Supp Law Enforcement Serv 110,728.74
716 Asset Forfeiture 176,992.76
720 Measure A-Public Safety Facility Tax 412.90
736 SA Admin Trust Fund 1,421.40
741 SA Debt Service Trust Fund (588,287.84)
747 Housing Successor Trust Fund 1,137.98
SUBTOTALS 255,839,649.24$
999 Invested Funds (250,814,594.93)
TOTAL 5,025,054.31$
Statement of Cash Balances
As of October 31, 2021
City of Clovis
ATTACHMENT 1
49 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.

Balance of Investments Previous Month End $251,915,338.98 Time Certificates of Deposit Transactions
Investments 0.00
Withdrawals 0.00
Total CD Changes 0.00
Other Changes
Government Securities 9,916,000.00
Local Agency Investment Fund 45,282.78
Municipal Securities 0.00
Sweep Account (11,062,026.83)
Total Other Changes (1,100,744.05)
Balance of Investments Current Month End 250,814,594.93$ Insured CD's 10,485,000.00
Government Securities 125,551,803.25
US Treasury Notes 0.00
Local Agency Investment Fund 74,410,222.72
Municipal Securities 5,900,000.00
Sweep Account 34,467,568.96
Investment Total 250,814,594.93$
City of Clovis
Distribution of Investments
As of October 31, 2021
City of Clovis
Summary of Investment Activity
For the month of October 31, 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
50 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.

Investment
Balance At Stated
Institution Face Value Amortized Cost Maturity Rate
FFCB 2,500,000.00 2,500,040.00 12/17/2021 2.800%
FAMCMTN 3,000,000.00 2,999,800.00 1/10/2022 1.520%
FHLMCMTN 6,000,000.00 6,036,212.00 1/13/2022 2.375%
FHLB 12,000,000.00 12,031,468.00 3/11/2022 2.500%
FFCB 5,960,000.00 5,965,675.00 3/28/2022 2.280%
FFCB 6,000,000.00 6,006,333.00 6/14/2022 1.875%
FAMCMTN 6,000,000.00 6,009,409.00 6/21/2022 1.950%
FFCB 3,000,000.00 3,002,434.00 8/22/2022 1.625%
FHLB 6,000,000.00 6,030,009.00 9/9/2022 2.000%
FFCB 3,000,000.00 2,992,397.00 10/11/2022 1.375%
FFCB 5,000,000.00 5,004,405.00 10/13/2022 1.600%
FHLB 5,000,000.00 5,025,864.00 12/9/2022 1.875%
FHLB 8,000,000.00 8,024,028.00 12/9/2022 1.875%
FAMCMTN 8,500,000.00 8,526,759.00 2/27/2023 1.350%
FHLB 13,000,000.00 5,162,000.00 3/10/2023 2.125%
FHLB 5,000,000.00 13,356,397.00 3/10/2023 2.125%
FFCB 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 3/1/2024 0.250%
FFCB 2,000,000.00 1,999,048.00 3/18/2024 0.300%
FHLB 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 6/7/2024 0.350%
FAMCMTN 5,000,000.00 4,948,500.00 9/8/2025 0.600%
FHLB 5,000,000.00 4,963,526.00 2/11/2026 0.580%
FFCB 5,000,000.00 4,967,500.00 9/28/2026 0.940%
Original Maturities Exceeding One Year
As of October 31, 2021
City of Clovis
ATTACHMENT 3
51 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: General Services
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: General Services – Approval – Res.- 22-___, Amending the FY 2021 - 2022 Transit Budget to add funds for purchase of the three (3) Ram Promaster Minibuses; and Waive the City’s Usual Purchasing Requirements and authorize the purchase of three (3) Ram Promaster Minibuses utilizing the CalACT Competitive Bid Award.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution and Budget Amendment

2. Quote from RO Bus Sales

3. Photograph of a Ram Promaster Minibus

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None

RECOMMENDATION
For the City Council to approve a resolution amending the FY 2021-2022 Transit budget to add $321,865.52; and to waive the usual purchasing requirements and authorize the City Manager to approve the purchase of three (3) Ram Promaster Minibuses utilizing the California Association for Coordinated Transportation (CalACT) competitive bid award.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends the purchase of three (3) Ram Promaster Minibuses as additional vehicles to be used for Round Up paratransit services. The purchase will aid in the delivery of transportation services to passengers using paratransit services. The total cost of the three minibuses is $321,865.52. There will be an additional nominal cost for installation of a two-way radio in each vehicle. The costs for the minibuses and associated expenses will be paid through State Transit Assistance (STA) funds already received.

BACKGROUND
Minibus Purchase
In 2010, following the end of the Caltrans purchasing cooperative, the California Association for Coordinated Transportation (CalACT ) created a purchasing cooperative administered by Morongo Basin Transit Authority to assist small and medium sized transit agencies with vehicle procurements. In 20 21, CalAC T completed its most recent extension of the contract and 52 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.
renewed the cooperative for transit vehicles using multiple vendors for a variety of buses, vans, and zero-emission vehicles.

The CalACT purchasing cooperative awards bid positions in accordance with the Federal Transit Administration and California Department of Transportation regulations and has been audited by both agencies with no findings. The purchasing cooperative is also com pliant with Buy America requirements. The purchase of transit vehicles requires technical expertise and a broad scope of knowledge of bus manufacturing concepts. By utilizing the cooperative, Clovis Transit can purchase the vehicles our operation needs at a compe titive cost. More than 250 transit agencies, including Caltrans, have purchased vehicles from the CalACT purchasing cooperative.

Like Caltrans did prior to the formation of the CalACT purchasing cooperative, CalACT charges a 1.5% procurement fee, and estimated delivery of the minibuses is 200 days.

Vehicle specifications and options were listed in the CalACT request for proposal and the vendor’s proposals. These specifications meet or exceed the transit operation’s desired vehicle design and capacity. Mos t importantly, these minibuses are designed to hold up to seven (7) passenger or three (3) passengers using mobi lity devices, yet are operated by a driver with a regular Class C license. This will provide additional flexibility to the transit operation dur ing the chronic commercial license driver shortage. The minibuses will be equipped with the following options:

 Manual swing ramp
 Multiple wheelchair securement locations to better accommodate a wide range of mobility devices
 ADA-compliant interlock, ramps, and door entrance lighting  Optional wider seats for passenger comfort and safety

FY2021-2022 Transit Budget Amendment
A budget amendment is required for the FY 2021-2022 budget to account for expenditure of $321,865.52 in previously received State Transit Assistance (STA) as follows:

 Transit Fund 515: Increase expenditure budget for vehicle purchase by $321,865.52 for the three (3) new minibuses.

FISCAL IMPACT
Adequate State Transit Assistance (STA) funds are held in the City’s Transit fund account for the purchase of the vehicles . Those funds will be added to the current budget with the budget amendment shown in Attachment 1.

Pricing for the recommended purchase is as follows:

 Proposed three (3) Ram Promaster Minibuses including tax, options, an d procurement fee: $321,865.52

Total: $321,865.52
__________________________________________________________________________ 53 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.

Details regarding pricing are in the quote from RO Bus Sales in Attachment 2.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
Vehicles with additional seating space and ability to accommodate mobility devices will upgrade the transit vehicle fleet. The minibuses can be operated by drivers with a Class C license, thereby providing additional flexibility to operations staff to main tain service levels. Clovis Transit’s use of the CalACT bid is within the City of Clovis Purchasing Policy, Section IV, C, 1, b, (1).

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Finance will amend the Transit FY 2021-2022 budget to reflect the budgetary changes to expenditure accounts. A purchase order will be prepared for the City Manager’s approval and the vehicles will be ordered. The minibuses are expected 200 days from order.

Prepared by: Amy Hance, General Services Manager

Reviewed by: City Manager JH

54 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 22-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE FY 2021-22

GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT

WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the FY2021-22 Budget on June 14, 2021; and,

WHEREAS, the City of Clovis has previously received State Transit Assistance (STA) funds for transit capital purchases; and,

WHEREAS, prior allocations of STA funds were not expended and remain in the Transit Fund awaiting allocation; and,

WHEREAS, the City Counci l has approved the expenditure of STA funds for the purchase of three (3) new wheelchair accessible minibuses; and

WHEREAS, the STA funds were not originally included in the FY 202 1-22 General Services budget.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Clovis hereby approves the budget amendment shown in the “Summary of Expenditures/Revenues by Department” “Summary of Expenditures/Revenues by Fund”, attached as Attachment A.

* * * * * * *

The foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on January 18, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Dated: January 18, 2022

________________________ ___________________________
Mayor City Clerk
55 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.

ATTACHMENT A

SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

DEPARTMENT – GENERAL SERVICES

Transit $321,865.52
TOTAL DEPARTMENT $321,865.52

SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES BY FUND

Transit $321,865.52
TOTAL FUND $321,865.52

SUMMARY OF REVENUES BY DEPARTMENT

DEPARTMENT – GENERAL SERVICES

Transit $321,865.52
TOTAL DEPARTMENT $321,865.52

SUMMARY OF REVENUE BY FUND

Transit $321,865.52
TOTAL FUND $321,865.52

NET GENERAL FUND SUPPORT

TOTAL $0

56 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.

ATTACHMENT 2
57 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.

ATTACHMENT 3
58 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: General Services Department
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: General Services – Approval – Res. 22-___, Authorizing Amendments to the Permit Technician Classification in the Planning and Development Services Department.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 22-___ Amendment to Classification Plan

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

RECOMMENDATION
For City Council to a pprove R esolution 22 -___, authorizing amendments to the Permit Technician classification in the Planning and Development Services Department.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
It is necessary to revise the Permit Technician classification in order to update the education and experience sections of the classification , and to make a few other minor changes.

Modification of the City’s Classification Plan requires the City Council’s approval.

BACKGROUND
An analysis was conducted of the P ermit Technician classification in advance of an upcoming recruitment. The analysis revealed that the classification education and experience section needed to be updated to accurately depict the required qualifications necessary for the incumbent to be successful in the position. Other minor revi sions to the classification are included in the update shown in Attachment A.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
The P ermit Technician classification is recommended for revision in order to update the education and experience section to better suit the department’s needs. The recommended changes to the City’s Classification Plan require Council approval.

59 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The City’s Classification Plan will be updated to include the revised Permit Technician classification.

Prepared by: Lori Shively, Personnel/Risk Manager

Reviewed by: City Manager _AH__

60 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 22-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR THE

PERMIT TECHNICIAN CLASSIFICATION IN THE

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

WHEREAS, it has been determined that amendments to the classification, and updates to the education and experience sections of the Permit Technician classification are necessary in order to recruit for this position; and

WHEREAS, modification of the City’s Classification Plan requires authorization by the City Council.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Clovis shall modify the City’s Classification Plan to include the revised Permit Technician Classification specifications in Attachment A.

* * * * * * * * * * *

The foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on January 18, 2022, by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED: January 18, 2022

___________________________ __________________________ Mayor City Clerk

61 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.

City of Clovis

PERMIT TECHNICIAN

DEFINITION
Under supervision receive s and review s building plans and applications; provide s technical advice and assistance regarding applicable law, code, and ordinance requirements; calculates permit fees,; issues building permits; and performs related work as required.

CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
Under supervision of the Building Official or Deputy Building Official , Planning and Development Services Department positions in this class are responsible for to processing building permit applications , including provideing information to the applicants, referring applications and plans to appropriate departments for review, and issueing permits. This classification is distinguished from other support classifications by its specialization in the building permit process, which requi res technical knowledge and certification. This classification is distinguished from the Permit Clerk/Checker class, as the latter is to possess certification as a Plans Examiner or Building Inspector. Incumbents are expected to resolve most problems con fronted through application of judgment and precedent, referring to the supervisor only those issues which involve the establishment of new procedures or which involve situations, which are inconsistent with departmental procedures and policies.

EXAMPLES OF DUTIES
In-person and remote customer interaction; receives, reviews, and assists in completion of building permit applications and associated site plans; respond s to inquiries and provides technical assistance to applicants and the public regarding permit, plan, and fee requirements consistent with applicable laws, codes, or ordinances; calculate s fees, generates and issue s building permits, and prepare s associated correspondence; performs over the counter plans checks for compliance on patios, decks, garages, signs, solar panels, block wall, and other small projects for structural soundness and compliance with all applicable codes and regulations; maintain s records of permit activity; prepare s correction lists and maintain s records of plan checking proce dures; and performs other duties as assigned related work as required.

TYPICAL QUALIFICATIONS

LICENSE AND CERTIFICATES REQUIRED
 Possession of a valid class C California Driver's License and a good driving record;  Possession of a current Within six (6) months of employment must obtain certification from the International Code Council I.C.C. (ICC) as a Permit Technician Certificate is required.

ATTACHMENT A
62 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.

EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE
Any combination of training and experience equivalent to:

Education:
 Graduation from High school diploma or equivalent.

And

Experience:
 Two (2) years of experience in an engineering, building, planning, or similar office closely related environment.

QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of:
 Knowledge of State and local engineering, building, planning and as well as local zoning codes;
 Principles and practices of the construction permitting process;  Office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers operation and associated office and permitting programs applicable software applications such as word processing, spreadsheets, and databases;
 Modern office methods and procedures;
 Record-keeping methods;
 Proper English usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation;  Basic mathematics;
 Maintain up to date logs, records, and files;
 Filing systems and procedures.;
 Appropriate safety precautions and procedures.

Ability to:
 Read and understand design blueprints and specifications;  Effectively meet and deal interact with developers, contractors, the public, and employees;
 Operate a computer and associated software;
 Operate a calculator efficiently and accurately;
 Keep Maintain accurate records;
 Read, understand, interpret, and apply applicable laws and codes;  Understand and carry out oral and written instructions;  Read, write, and spell using proper grammar and punctuation;  Use appropriate safety precautions and procedures.
 Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing;  Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work;
 Operate a vehicle, observing legal and defensive driving practices;.

63 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING CONDITIONS
 Environment: Job functions are performed in an office, outdoor, and driving environments; regularly exposed to outdoor cold and hot temperatures, and inclement weather conditions; extensive public contact; and moderate to loud noise levels.  Strength: Moderate work -lifting, carrying, and/or pushing 50 pounds with frequent lifting and/or carrying of objects weighing up to 25 pounds.

64 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services Department
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Planning and Development Services - Approval – Final Acceptance for CIP 20-06 Shaw Avenue Street Rehabilitation.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

RECOMMENDATION
For the City Council to accept the work performed as complete and authorize recording of the notice of completion.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The project involved 0.5-mile of street rehabilitation on Shaw Avenue from Sunnyside to Fowler including grinding and replacing A.C. pavement, replacements of concrete curb returns, sidewalks and minor median island, adjustments of existing utility boxes, manholes, and utility valve boxes to finish grades, replacements of traffic striping, markings and signage, traffic signal modification, and reinstallation of traffic loop detectors. This project also involved rehabilitation of asphalt concrete sections in full depth at the Shaw-Sunnyside Intersection and Shaw-Fowler Intersection.

BACKGROUND
The bid opening was July 13, 2021, and City Council pre -authorized the City Manager on July 12, 2021, to award the project to the lowest respo nsible bidder, which was determined to be Emmett’s Excavation, Inc. The project was completed in accordance with the construction documents and within the total contract time allotted.

65 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.

FISCAL IMPACT

1. Contract Award Amount $1,242,085.00

2. Cost Increases/Decreases - resulting from differences between ($22,362.30) estimated quantities used for award and actual quantities installed

3. Contract Change Orders $0.00

4. Liquidated Damages Assessed $0.00
Final Contract Cost $1,219,722.70

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Department, City Engineer, Engineering Inspector , and Project Engineer agree that the work performed by the contractor is in accordance with the project plans and specifications and has been deemed acceptable. The contractor, Emmett’s Exc avation, Inc., has requested final acceptance.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL

1. The notice of completion will be recorded; and

2. All retention funds will be released pursuant to Federal requirements and the Prompt Payment of Funds Withheld to Subcontractors clause of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.

Prepared by: Shawn Scott, Engineering Inspector

Reviewed by: City Manager JH

66 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.
67 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services Department
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Planning and Development Services – Approval – Res. 22 -___, Amending the FY 2021 -2022 Community Investment Program (CIP) Budget for CIP 14-30, Shaw Avenue Widening – Phase 1 from Leonard to McCall Avenues; Bid Award for CIP 14-30 to Avison Construction, Inc.; and Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract on behalf of the City.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Res. 22-___ - Budget Amendment

2. Vicinity Map

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

RECOMMENDATION

1. For the City Council to approve a resolution amending the FY 2021-2022 Community Investment Program (CIP) budget for the Shaw Avenue Widening – Phase 1 Project; and

2. For the City Council to award a contract for CIP 1 4-30, Shaw Avenue Widening – Phase 1 to Avison Construction, Inc., in the amount of $12,349,563.00; and

3. For the City Council to authorize the City Manager to execute the contract on behalf of the City.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff is recommending that City Council approve a resolution amending the CIP budget for the Shaw Avenue Widening – Phase 1 Project and authorize the City Manager to award and execute the contr act to Avison Construction , Inc. who w as the lowest responsible bidder from a bid opening that took place on January 11, 2022.

The project consists of widening Shaw Avenue between Leonard and McCall Avenues from a two-lane rural road to a five- to six- lane urban arterial street. Project will construct:
 From Leonard Avenue to Highland Avenue - three westbound lanes, three eastbound lanes, bike lanes, a raised median, and streetlights
68 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.
 From Highland Avenue to McCall Avenue - two westbound lanes, three eastbound lanes, bike lanes, a raised median, and streetlights on the eastbound side  Traffic signal components at the intersections of Shaw Avenue/Leonard Avenue and Shaw Avenue/McCall Avenue
 Water, recycled water, and sewer mains planned for the project area  Storm water facilities that the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District has planned for the project area

BACKGROUND
In December of 201 3, the City entered into a cooperative agreement with the Fresno County Transportation Authority for funding of the Shaw Widening project from DeWolf to McCall Avenues, pursuant to the Measure “C” Strategic Implementation Plan and the Fresno County Measure “C” Expenditure Plan, which was approved by the voters of Fresno County in November of 2006.

The Measure “C” funding provides for all transportation related improvements to widen Shaw Avenue. The project also includes the installation of sewer mains, water mains, storm drain improvements and streetlights, as well as the modification of 2 signalized intersections. The sewer and water improvements cannot be funded by Measure “C”, so the budget included money from the developer accounts to complete the improvements in advance of development along Shaw Avenue. City staff reasoned that if the utilities were not installed with this project, significant portions of the new street improvements would need to be removed and replaced at substantial additional cost.

The low bid for the project is about 13% over the engineer’s estimate . The street work is only about 2% over the engineers estimate. A majority of the overage is due to the cost of the utilities, and mainly includes the water main costs. This cost difference can be related to the ongoing escalation in pipe material costs and shortage of supply. Due to the discrepancy between the low bid and the estimate, the budget for the water portion of the project is insufficient. The following is the comparison:

Budget Bid Costs
Water Improvements $980,000.00 $1,770,815.00

Staff believes it is prudent to install the utilities with the street work for this project even though the costs are high. The proposed budget amendment would increase the budget to reflect bid costs received and allow for a 6% contingency to complete construction.

The following is a summary of the bid results of January 11, 2022:

BIDDERS BASE BIDS

Avison Construction, Inc. $12,349,563.00
Cal Valley Construction, Inc. $12,629,893.00
Yarbs Grading and Paving, Inc. $12,663,962.00
Emmett’s Excavation, Inc. $12,939,026.00
69 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.

Agee Construction Corp. $13,206,567.00
Granite Construction Co. $13,225,022.00
American Paving CO. $13,244,917.00
Teichert Construction $13,363,000.00
Dave Christian Construction Co., Inc. $13,464,384.50

ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE $10,923,532.00

All bids were examined, and the bidder’s submittals were found to be in order with the exception of one mathematical error of one bidder that did not affect the order of the top 5 bidders. Avison Construction, Inc. is the lowest apparent bidder. Staff has validated the lowest bidder contractor’s license status.

FISCAL IMPACT
This project was budgeted in the Community Investment Program. The street improvements for the project are fully supported by Regional Measure ‘C’ funding in the City Community Investment Program. The sewer improvements are supported by the sewer developer fund, and the water improvements are supported by the water developer fund in the City Community Investment Program. There are sufficient funds to account for the additional expenditures in the budget amendment for Water Developer Funding. These expendi tures have the potential to impact the water enterprise funds in the future, which cover shortfalls in the developer funds when fee collections aren’t sufficient to cover debt service and projects in a given.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
Avison Construction, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder. The budget amendment is needed to financially account for the additional expenditures in the Water Developer.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL

1. Funds will be appropriated and accounted for in the City of Clovis 2021 -2022 Budget as specified in the attached budget amendment.

2. The contract will be prepared and executed, subject to the Contractor providing performance security that is satisfactory to the City.

3. Construction will begin approximately two (2) weeks after contract e xecution and shall be completed in two hundred-sixty (260) working days thereafter.

Prepared by: Fernando Copetti, Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: City Manager __AH__

70 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 22-___

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022

WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the 2021-2022 Budget on June 14, 2021; and

WHEREAS, the City Council approved the expenditure of funds for the 2021 -2022 Community Investment Program – Water Developer Fund; and

WHEREAS, the additional expenditures needed for th e Shaw Avenue Widening – Phase 1 from Leonard to McCall were not anticipated or included in the 2021 -2022 Community Investment Program – Water Developer Fund.

NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESO LVED, that the City Council of the City of Clovis approves the budget amendment as shown in the “Summary of Expenditures by Department”, and “Summary of Expenditures by Fund attached as Attachment A.

* * * * *

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on January 18, 2022, by the following vote, to wit.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED: January 18, 2022

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

71 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.

ATTACHMENT A

SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT

Department

Water Developer $900,000

Total $900,000

SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES BY FUND

Fund

Water Developer $900,000

Total $900,000

72 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.

Willow
Peach
Clovis
Sunnyside
Fowler
Armstrong
Temperance
Locan
De Wolf
Shepherd
Teague
Nees
Alluvial
Herndon
Sierra
Bullard
Barstow
Shaw
Gettysburg
Ashlan
Dakota
Leonard
Highland
Minnewawa
4 ATTACHMENT A

CITY LIMITS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE

VICINITY MAP
1 Project Location
2 McCall
January 18, 2022 Fernando Copetti
CIP 14-30 Shaw Avenue Widening - Phase 1
73 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT: Planning and Development Services – Approval – Res. 22 -____, Amending the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) Schedule of Drainage Costs and Fees for 2022-2023.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Res. 22-____

2. FMFCD Fee Adoption Letter and Exhibits

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

RECOMMENDATION
For the City Council to approve Res. 22-___, which will amend FMFCD Storm Drainage per - acre costs and fees for 2022-2023:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 1961, the Cities of Fresno and Clovis and the County of Fresno adopted, as an element of the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan Area General Plan, a Sto rm Drainage Master Plan prepared by the Flood Control District for the metropolitan area. In 1969, these agencies adopted virtually identical drainage fee ordinances to provide for the funding of planned drainage facilities concurrently with development activity which created the need for such facilities.

The local drainage plan shows the drainage area boundaries. Also shown are proposed and existing master plan facilities in each watershed area.

The rate structure associated with each master plan drainage area is based on the total cost of the urban drainage system including land, improvements and any engineering required to serve the subject area. The cost of the proposed facilities is estimated. As the facilities are constructed the estimated costs will be replaced by the actual costs. The total cost is divided into the total land area using appropriate proportionate ratios (related to storm runoff characteristics) between the various contributing/benefiting land uses.

74 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

This year’s update includes fee adjustments in certain drainage areas, zones , and surcharges within the City of Clovis (AQ, BC, BT, BX, BY2, CL, CZ, DL, DM, DO, DP, DQ, 7C, 7D, 7H, Zone 2, Zone 3, and surcharge fees for BX, DO and 7D) due to unit cost updates.

The drainage fees paid pursuant to the ordinance are deposited into a separate trust account.

The monies are not commingled with District general funds, are not used to fund any administration, operations, or maintenance c osts, and must be expended within the drainage area in which they are paid. The 5% development review component of the fee reimburses the District for the cost of engineering services provided by the District.

The fee ordinance, enacted under the authorit y of the State Subdivision Map Act, requires the identification of the estimated or actual cost of the planned facilities through the adoption of a resolution. Because the fees are based on the cost of facilities, the resolution serves also as the schedule of fees.

The Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District consists of three zones. Zone 3 is generally comprised of the core area of the City of Clovis. Zone 2 is mostly in the City of Fresno, except for some portions of Drainage Areas “Q” and “S”, which are predominately within Clovis. Zone 1 includes all of the areas within the District’s jurisdiction that are not in Zone 2 or Zone 3.

Attachment “A” lists the proposed drainage fee adjustments. City staff has had the opportunity to review the proposed a djustments with FMFCD staff and believes the adjustments are supported by the recently completed cost studies. District staff has indicated that the District contacted the Building Industry Association in reviewing the proposed drainage fee update.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
In accordance with the District’s drainage fee ordinance, the District’s fee schedule is to be adjusted annually, or as warranted. This year the update was based upon examination of all drainage systems and their related costs and fee schedules.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Adopt and implement the 2022-2023 FMFCD Drainage Fees for local drainage fees.

Prepared by: Gene G. Abella, Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: City Manager _AH__
75 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

RESOLUTION 22-____

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS

AMENDING THE STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL MASTER PLAN

AND ADOPTING THE DRAINAGE FEES AND COSTS

FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE JOINT AREA OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS

AND THE FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
(2022-2023)

WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Clovis has enacted Chapter 7, Title 8 of the Clovis Municipal Code, which ordinance is hereby incorporated herein by this reference, creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging fees for the construction of planned local storm drainage facilities; and
WHEREAS, an amended Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map (Attachment “A” hereto) specifying public facilities and improvements, existing and proposed, which are necessary to provide drainage service and flood control within the respective local drainage areas specified therein has been presented to the Council of the City of Clovis; and
WHEREAS, a study has been conducted of the impacts of contemplated future development on the existing storm drainage services and facilities in the local drainage areas of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (“District”) and the City of Clovis (“City”) listed in Attachment “B” attached hereto, along with an analysis of new, improved or expanded public facilit ies, the estimated costs of those improvements, and the schedule of per gross acre fees calculated to raise the sum of money necessary to pay the estimated total cost of said local drainage in said local drainage areas; and WHEREAS, this study was availabl e at the District's office for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public meeting and notice was given in compliance with the requirements therefore; and
WHEREAS, a public meeting was held pursuant to the public notice cited herein at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Council of the City of Clovis; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Clovis finds as follows:

A. The purpose of said fees is to finance facilities within the City and District required for the removal of surface and storm waters attributable to development; to obviate the menace to the public health, safety and welfare arising from inadequate provision for removal of surface and storm waters occurring as the result of development of property; to prevent deterioration of property values and impairment of conditions making for desirable residential, commercial or industrial development, as the case may be, which would result from the failure to construct planned local drainage facilities relative to development of property; and to prevent deterioration of public streets and other public facilities which would result from failure to construct planned local drainage ATTACHMENT 1
76 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

facilities concurrently with development.

B. The fees adopted hereby and collected pursuant to Chapter 7, Title 8 of the Clovis Municipal Code and this Resolution are to be used to finance only the public facilities shown on Attachment “A” hereto within each of the respective local drainage areas identified in Attachment “B” hereto;
C. After considering said Map and said study and analysis prepared by the District, entitled “Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan”, and that prepar ed by the City Planning Department entitled “Clovis General Plan,” and the various community and specific plans of the City; and the information and testimony received at this public hearing, the Council of the City of Clovis approves said Map and said stu dy, and incorporates such herein. The Council further finds that all development in the subject area will generate the need, as described in this recital, for storm drainage facilities therein, and generates an unmet need for storm drainage facilities and services within the impacted area;
D. There is a need in this described impact area for storm drainage facilities which have not been constructed or have been constructed; said facilities have been called for in, or are consistent with, the City’s General Plan. Development will contribute its fair share towards these facility costs in those local drainage areas listed in Attachment “B” through payment of the respective drainage fees set forth therein; E. The facts and evidence presented establish that the re is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities and the impacts of the types of development as described in Attachment “A” and “B” for which the corresponding fee set forth in Attachment “B” is charged. There is a reas onable relationship between the use of said fee and the development of the lands in the service area for which the fee is charged, as these reasonable relationships or nexuses are described in more detail in the study and Map referred to above;
F. The Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map attached hereto as Attachment “A” and the storm drainage fees set forth in Attachment “B”, as adopted by Paragraphs 2 and 3 herein below, revise the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan, are in conformit y with the City’s General Plan and are in compliance with Section 66483 of the California Government Code.

G. The cost estimates set forth in Attachment “B” are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities and the fee schedule set forth ther ein is based on said estimates and is to generate fees from development which will not exceed the total of these costs.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Clovis as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct, and this Council so finds and determines.
77 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

2. The Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan is hereby amended to include that Storm Drain and Flood Control Master Plan Map attached hereto as Attachment “A” as supported by Attachment “B”.

3. The schedule of drainage fees for those respective local drainage areas listed in Attachment “B” hereto is hereby adopted as set forth in said Attachment “B”. The District shall prepare, and provide to the City, a 2022-2023 schedule of drainage fees for each of its local drainage areas, which shall include the fees adopted hereby. Fees shall be paid in accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinances according to said 2022 -2023 drainage fee schedule.

4. The fee shall be solely used to pay: (a) costs related to the design, administration and constru ction of the described public storm water facilities; (b) for reimbursing the District for the development's fair share of those costs incurred by the District in the design and construction of the described public storm water facilities; or (c) to reimbur se other developers who have constructed public facilities in each service area where those facilities were beyond that needed to mitigate the impacts of the other developers' project or projects and where reimbursement is provided for in the applicable Dr ainage Fee Ordinance or the Development Impact Fee Ordinance.

5. The District, pursuant to Chapter 7 of Title 8 of the Municipal Code, shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements for which this fee is charged, the continued or expanded need therefore, and the reasonable relationship between such facility needs and the varying types and development. The Manager shall report the findings to the City Council and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed.

6. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66022, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Resolution shall be brought within 120 days of the effective date hereof, which shall be 60 days after the date of adoption hereof. Administrative appeal is a mandatory prerequisite to any such judicial action or proceeding. Such appeal shall be made in writing to the Director of Public Works of the City of Clovis. Such appeal must be made within 60 days after the effective date hereof. The Director shall set the matter for hearing, conduct the hearing and render a decision within 40 days after such appeal is filed.

7. The Ordinance of the City of Clovis has an administrative mechanism whereby a property owner who seeks to develop property within the boundaries of the City of Clovis and the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District can ch allenge the fees imposed thereunder only by first paying said fees under protest. Developers of property within the City of Clovis and the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District shall adhere to the applicable ordinance of the City of Clovis under whic h it is required that drainage fees must be paid before development is allowed, and that such fee may be paid under protest.

78 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

* * * * *

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on January 18, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:

Mayor City Clerk
79 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

ATTACHMENT A
Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map
80 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2022 DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE
City of Clovis
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
1 of 82022 FMFCD3/2022
ATTACHMENT B 81
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
82 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
AQ

BASIN
$1,790
$2,040
$2,560
$3,060
$3,580
$3,830
$4,030
$4,230
$4,230
$4,730
$5,750
$8,360
$8,950
$9,600
$3,855,130
PIPE
$4,880
$5,510
$7,320
$7,950
$8,630
$8,980
$9,270
$9,510
$9,510
$10,200
$10,880
$12,630
$13,370
$14,100
$6,891,230
TOTAL
$6,670
$7,550
$9,880
$11,010
$12,210
$12,810
$13,300
$13,740
$13,740
$14,930
$16,630
$20,990
$22,320
$23,700
$10,746,360
BC

BASIN
$1,820
$2,080
$2,610
$3,120
$3,640
$3,900
$4,100
$4,300
$4,300
$4,810
$5,850
$8,510
$9,110
$9,770
$5,005,980
PIPE
$3,030
$3,430
$4,550
$4,940
$5,370
$5,580
$5,760
$5,910
$5,910
$6,340
$6,760
$7,850
$8,310
$8,760
$6,117,560
TOTAL
$4,850
$5,510
$7,160
$8,060
$9,010
$9,480
$9,860
$10,210
$10,210
$11,150
$12,610
$16,360
$17,420
$18,530
$11,123,540
BT

BASIN
$2,330
$2,650
$3,330
$3,980
$4,660
$4,980
$5,240
$5,490
$5,490
$6,150
$7,470
$10,870
$11,640
$12,480
$4,836,130
PIPE
$4,850
$5,490
$7,280
$7,910
$8,590
$8,930
$9,220
$9,470
$9,470
$10,150
$10,830
$12,570
$13,300
$14,030
$8,899,510
TOTAL
$7,180
$8,140
$10,610
$11,890
$13,250
$13,910
$14,460
$14,960
$14,960
$16,300
$18,300
$23,440
$24,940
$26,510
$13,735,640
BU

BASIN
$550
$630
$790
$940
$1,100
$1,180
$1,240
$1,300
$1,300
$1,450
$1,760
$2,570
$2,750
$2,940
$2,468,350
PIPE
$2,020
$2,280
$3,030
$3,290
$3,580
$3,720
$3,840
$3,940
$3,940
$4,220
$4,500
$5,230
$5,530
$5,840
$5,320,610
TOTAL
$2,570
$2,910
$3,820
$4,230
$4,680
$4,900
$5,080
$5,240
$5,240
$5,670
$6,260
$7,800
$8,280
$8,780
$7,788,960
BW

BASIN
$970
$1,110
$1,390
$1,660
$1,940
$2,080
$2,190
$2,300
$2,300
$2,570
$3,120
$4,540
$4,860
$5,210
$1,211,930
PIPE
$1,090
$1,240
$1,640
$1,780
$1,940
$2,010
$2,080
$2,130
$2,130
$2,290
$2,440
$2,830
$3,000
$3,160
$1,082,900
TOTAL
$2,060
$2,350
$3,030
$3,440
$3,880
$4,090
$4,270
$4,430
$4,430
$4,860
$5,560
$7,370
$7,860
$8,370
$2,294,830
BX

BASIN
$1,550
$1,760
$2,210
$2,650
$3,100
$3,310
$3,480
$3,650
$3,650
$4,090
$4,970
$7,230
$7,740
$8,300
$6,284,770
PIPE
$2,960
$3,340
$4,430
$4,820
$5,230
$5,440
$5,620
$5,770
$5,770
$6,180
$6,590
$7,660
$8,100
$8,540
$9,816,340
TOTAL
$4,510
$5,100
$6,640
$7,470
$8,330
$8,750
$9,100
$9,420
$9,420
$10,270
$11,560
$14,890
$15,840
$16,840
$16,101,110
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n Nos. 2017-864
& 2018-908.

BY2

BASIN
$1,820
$2,070
$2,600
$3,110
$3,640
$3,890
$4,090
$4,290
$4,290
$4,800
$5,840
$8,490
$9,090
$9,750
$4,277,390
PIPE
$7,210
$8,150
$10,820
$11,760
$12,770
$13,270
$13,710
$14,070
$14,070
$15,080
$16,090
$18,680
$19,770
$20,850
$14,222,460
TOTAL
$9,030
$10,220
$13,420
$14,870
$16,410
$17,160
$17,800
$18,360
$18,360
$19,880
$21,930
$27,170
$28,860
$30,600
$18,499,850
BZ

BASIN
$2,830
$3,230
$4,050
$4,850
$5,670
$6,070
$6,380
$6,690
$6,690
$7,480
$9,100
$13,240
$14,170
$15,190
$3,600,920
PIPE
$2,020
$2,280
$3,030
$3,290
$3,570
$3,710
$3,830
$3,930
$3,930
$4,220
$4,500
$5,220
$5,530
$5,830
$2,176,590
TOTAL
$4,850
$5,510
$7,080
$8,140
$9,240
$9,780
$10,210
$10,620
$10,620
$11,700
$13,600
$18,460
$19,700
$21,020
$5,777,510
CL

BASIN
$850
$970
$1,210
$1,450
$1,700
$1,820
$1,910
$2,000
$2,000
$2,240
$2,730
$3,970
$4,250
$4,550
$2,221,940
PIPE
$1,170
$1,330
$1,760
$1,910
$2,080
$2,160
$2,230
$2,290
$2,290
$2,450
$2,620
$3,040
$3,220
$3,390
$2,230,610
TOTAL
$2,020
$2,300
$2,970
$3,360
$3,780
$3,980
$4,140
$4,290
$4,290
$4,690
$5,350
$7,010
$7,470
$7,940
$4,452,550
CZ

BASIN
$550
$620
$780
$940
$1,090
$1,170
$1,230
$1,290
$1,290
$1,440
$1,760
$2,550
$2,740
$2,930
$1,511,580
PIPE
$1,260
$1,420
$1,880
$2,050
$2,220
$2,310
$2,380
$2,450
$2,450
$2,620
$2,800
$3,250
$3,440
$3,630
$2,786,520
TOTAL
$1,810
$2,040
$2,660
$2,990
$3,310
$3,480
$3,610
$3,740
$3,740
$4,060
$4,560
$5,800
$6,180
$6,560
$4,298,100
DL

BASIN
$2,750
$3,130
$3,930
$4,690
$5,490
$5,880
$6,180
$6,480
$6,480
$7,250
$8,810
$12,820
$13,730
$14,720
$3,199,720
PIPE
$4,760
$5,380
$7,140
$7,760
$8,420
$8,760
$9,040
$9,280
$9,280
$9,950
$10,610
$12,320
$13,040
$13,750
$3,896,570
TOTAL
$7,510
$8,510
$11,070
$12,450
$13,910
$14,640
$15,220
$15,760
$15,760
$17,200
$19,420
$25,140
$26,770
$28,470
$7,096,290
DM

BASIN
$2,070
$2,360
$2,960
$3,530
$4,130
$4,420
$4,650
$4,880
$4,880
$5,460
$6,640
$9,650
$10,340
$11,080
$5,060,300
PIPE
$6,730
$7,610
$10,100
$10,980
$11,920
$12,390
$12,800
$13,130
$13,130
$14,080
$15,020
$17,440
$18,450
$19,460
$13,593,740
TOTAL
$8,800
$9,970
$13,060
$14,510
$16,050
$16,810
$17,450
$18,010
$18,010
$19,540
$21,660
$27,090
$28,790
$30,540
$18,654,040
DO

BASIN
$1,990
$2,260
$2,840
$3,400
$3,970
$4,250
$4,470
$4,690
$4,690
$5,240
$6,380
$9,280
$9,930
$10,650
$6,058,270
PIPE
$2,950
$3,340
$4,430
$4,810
$5,230
$5,430
$5,610
$5,760
$5,760
$6,170
$6,580
$7,650
$8,090
$8,530
$6,993,820
TOTAL
$4,940
$5,600
$7,270
$8,210
$9,200
$9,680
$10,080
$10,450
$10,450
$11,410
$12,960
$16,930
$18,020
$19,180
$13,052,090
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n Nos. 2007-522,
2014-806, 2018-
887, 2018-908, &
2020-959
3 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
83 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
DP

BASIN
$1,830
$2,080
$2,610
$3,130
$3,660
$3,910
$4,110
$4,310
$4,310
$4,830
$5,870
$8,540
$9,140
$9,800
$6,826,920
PIPE
$6,300
$7,120
$9,450
$10,260
$11,150
$11,590
$11,960
$12,280
$12,280
$13,160
$14,040
$16,310
$17,250
$18,200
$17,510,400
TOTAL
$8,130
$9,200
$12,060
$13,390
$14,810
$15,500
$16,070
$16,590
$16,590
$17,990
$19,910
$24,850
$26,390
$28,000
$24,337,320
DQ

BASIN
$6,430
$7,330
$9,190
$10,990
$12,860
$13,760
$14,470
$15,170
$15,170
$16,970
$20,640
$30,020
$32,150
$34,460
$5,304,770
PIPE
$5,410
$6,110
$8,120
$8,820
$9,580
$9,960
$10,280
$10,550
$10,550
$11,310
$12,070
$14,020
$14,830
$15,640
$3,842,840
TOTAL
$11,840
$13,440
$17,310
$19,810
$22,440
$23,720
$24,750
$25,720
$25,720
$28,280
$32,710
$44,040
$46,980
$50,100
$9,147,610
1G

BASIN
$1,330
$1,330
$1,670
$1,990
$2,330
$2,500
$2,620
$2,750
$2,750
$3,080
$3,740
$5,450
$5,830
$6,250
$1,660,870
PIPE
$1,380
$1,380
$1,830
$1,980
$2,150
$2,240
$2,310
$2,370
$2,370
$2,540
$2,710
$3,150
$3,330
$3,520
$1,541,159
TOTAL
$2,710
$2,710
$3,500
$3,970
$4,480
$4,740
$4,930
$5,120
$5,120
$5,620
$6,450
$8,600
$9,160
$9,770
$3,202,029
3G

BASIN
$2,130
$2,430
$3,050
$3,650
$4,270
$4,560
$4,800
$5,030
$5,030
$5,630
$6,850
$9,960
$10,670
$11,430
$4,649,160
PIPE
$2,260
$2,560
$3,390
$3,690
$4,010
$4,160
$4,300
$4,410
$4,410
$4,730
$5,050
$5,860
$6,200
$6,540
$4,154,740
TOTAL
$4,390
$4,990
$6,440
$7,340
$8,280
$8,720
$9,100
$9,440
$9,440
$10,360
$11,900
$15,820
$16,870
$17,970
$8,803,900
7C

BASIN
$1,950
$2,230
$2,790
$3,340
$3,910
$4,180
$4,400
$4,610
$4,610
$5,160
$6,270
$9,120
$9,770
$10,470
$3,835,680
PIPE
$1,230
$1,390
$1,840
$2,000
$2,170
$2,260
$2,330
$2,390
$2,390
$2,570
$2,740
$3,180
$3,360
$3,550
$1,731,900
TOTAL
$3,180
$3,620
$4,630
$5,340
$6,080
$6,440
$6,730
$7,000
$7,000
$7,730
$9,010
$12,300
$13,130
$14,020
$5,567,580
7D

BASIN
$2,140
$2,440
$3,060
$3,660
$4,290
$4,590
$4,820
$5,060
$5,060
$5,660
$6,880
$10,010
$10,710
$11,480
$3,756,650
PIPE
$1,830
$2,060
$2,740
$2,980
$3,230
$3,360
$3,470
$3,560
$3,560
$3,820
$4,070
$4,730
$5,010
$5,280
$2,216,710
TOTAL
$3,970
$4,500
$5,800
$6,640
$7,520
$7,950
$8,290
$8,620
$8,620
$9,480
$10,950
$14,740
$15,720
$16,760
$5,973,360
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n Nos. 2005-480
& 2018-908.
7H

BASIN
$2,290
$2,610
$3,280
$3,920
$4,580
$4,900
$5,150
$5,410
$5,410
$6,050
$7,350
$10,700
$11,450
$12,280
$5,192,980
PIPE
$4,590
$5,180
$6,880
$7,480
$8,120
$8,440
$8,710
$8,940
$8,940
$9,590
$10,230
$11,880
$12,570
$13,250
$7,363,960
TOTAL
$6,880
$7,790
$10,160
$11,400
$12,700
$13,340
$13,860
$14,350
$14,350
$15,640
$17,580
$22,580
$24,020
$25,530
$12,556,940
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n Nos. 2005-480
& 2018-908.
4 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
84 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Area
Basin Cost
Pipe Cost
Total
OO
$2,241,180
$790,011
$3,031,191
PP
$1,827,799
$1,220,346
$3,048,145
RR
$5,178,163
$18,328,132
$23,506,295
SS
$2,525,088
$3,296,790
$5,821,878
TT
$1,959,614
$1,599,471
$3,559,085
UU1
$474,282
$1,155,629
$1,629,911
UU2
$1,590,601
$1,686,286
$3,276,887
UU3
$3,419,421
$9,617,554
$13,036,975
VV
$34,124
$116,961
$151,085
WW
$18,653
$360,044
$378,697
XX
$1,025,092
$2,174,474
$3,199,566
ZZ
$2,565,696
$2,869,195
$5,434,891
Planned Local Drianage Areas: Zone 2
Area
Basin Cost
Pipe Cost
Total
X
$1,839,287
$448,581
$2,287,868
Y
$1,175,737
$2,265,162
$3,440,899
Z
$1,121,879
$2,525,668
$3,647,547
**
AA
$978,116
$1,343,241
$2,321,357
BB
$499,109
$822,774
$1,321,883
CC
$465,921
$2,085,168
$2,551,089
CO2
$904,070
$1,424,260
$2,328,330
DD
$1,896,981
$7,725,461
$9,622,442
EE
$754,118
$3,358,704
$4,112,822
FF
$1,433,799
$9,604,610
$11,038,409
GG
$2,485,389
$1,539,639
$4,025,028
HH
$4,200,015
$5,506,475
$9,706,490
II1
$4,819,438
$16,627,228
$21,446,666
II2
$7,945,847
$1,306,882
$9,252,729
II3
$1,745,301
$1,672,599
$3,417,900
II4
$2,259,789
$1,113,110
$3,372,899
JJ
$2,039,095
$3,846,098
$5,885,193
KK
$1,999,167
$1,486,803
$3,485,970
LL
$2,283,613
$3,412,009
$5,695,622
MM
$567,301
$944,465
$1,511,766
Area
Basin Cost
Pipe Cost
Total
A
$2,299,010
$1,716,030
$4,015,040
B
$1,050,726
$142,170
$1,192,896
C
$479,953
$317,414
$797,367
D
$801,395
$694,153
$1,495,548
E
$777,422
$228,063
$1,005,485
F
$284,535
$302,016
$586,551
G
$1,153,808
$157,007
$1,310,815
H
$99,858
$214,682
$314,540
I
$227,828
$248,025
$475,853
J
$1,682,005
$435,847
$2,117,852
K
$1,040,301
$677,207
$1,717,508
L
$662,320
$494,850
$1,157,170
M
$967,464
$257,885
$1,225,349
N
$482,052
$434,159
$916,211
O
$1,046,970
$190,138
$1,237,108
P
$884,478
$277,552
$1,162,030
T
$1,731,054
$2,463,036
$4,194,090
U
$1,454,875
$672,938
$2,127,813
V
$660,035
$1,726,395
$2,386,430
W
$1,934,684
$3,474,333
$5,409,017
*
W
* Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution No. 885-BPBR.

Z
** Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution Nos. 1227, 1265, 1268, 1386.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 2: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
Zone 2
BASIN
$750
$850
$1,070
$1,280
$1,490
$1,600
$1,680
$1,760
$1,760
$1,970
$2,390
$3,480
$3,730
$4,000
$83,994,458
PIPE
$1,610
$1,820
$2,420
$2,630
$2,850
$2,970
$3,060
$3,140
$3,140
$3,370
$3,590
$4,180
$4,420
$4,660
$127,397,730
TOTAL
$2,360
$2,670
$3,490
$3,910
$4,340
$4,570
$4,740
$4,900
$4,900
$5,340
$5,980
$7,660
$8,150
$8,660
$211,392,188
5 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
85 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Planned Local Drianage Areas: Zone 3
Area
Basin Cost
Pipe Cost
Total
Q
$393,027
$411,805
$804,832
S
$1,310,299
$2,270,780
$3,581,079
1E
$2,104,757
$933,226
$3,037,983
2D
$831,893
$1,423,085
$2,254,978
3A
$1,332,641
$913,853
$2,246,494
3D
$1,427,625
$1,032,196
$2,459,821
3F
$1,105,476
$1,224,524
$2,330,000
4B
$1,549,023
$988,399
$2,537,422
4C
$1,144,187
$2,383,951
$3,528,138
4D
$3,623,973
$1,032,287
$4,656,260
4E
$3,631,939
$2,148,572
$5,780,511
5B/5C
$4,484,990
$2,231,625
$6,716,615
5F
$1,589,077
$1,530,399
$3,119,476
6D
$1,458,901
$1,586,892
$3,045,793
Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 3: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
Zone 3
BASIN
$1,410
$1,600
$2,010
$2,410
$2,820
$3,010
$3,170
$3,320
$3,320
$3,720
$4,520
$6,570
$7,040
$7,550
$25,987,808
PIPE
$1,520
$1,720
$2,280
$2,480
$2,690
$2,800
$2,890
$2,970
$2,970
$3,180
$3,400
$3,940
$4,170
$4,400
$20,111,594
TOTAL
$2,930
$3,320
$4,290
$4,890
$5,510
$5,810
$6,060
$6,290
$6,290
$6,900
$7,920
$10,510
$11,210
$11,950
$46,099,402
6 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
86 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR SURCHARGE AREAS: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
W

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$11,075
-
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 885-BPBR

Z

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$1,970
$2,110
$2,250
$2,615
$5,380
$2,915
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1386

BX

TOTAL
-
$270
$360
$390
$430
$445
$445
$445
$470
$510
$540
$630
$660
$700
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2008-590

BX

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$14,310
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2017-884

CM

TOTAL
$90
$105
$135
$145
$160
$165
$165
$165
$175
$185
$200
$235
$485
$260
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1228

CN

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$2,200
$2,395
$2,695
$3,465
$3,690
$3,925
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1422

DE

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
$790
$790
$790
$840
$900
-
$1,120
$1,250
$1,250
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2006-486

DN

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
$11,270
$11,640
$11,940
$11,940
-
-
-
-
$17,700
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2017-884

DO

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$4,350
$4,350
$4,660
$4,660
-
$6,110
$6,440
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2018-887

DO

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$4,140
$4,140
-
-
$5,720
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2020-959

7D

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$5,555
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2005-480

7H

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$5,555
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2005-480

7 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
87 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8 of 82022 FMFCD3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022City of Clovis
88 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
Capturing Stormwater since 1956
5469 E. Olive Avenue • Fresno, CA 93727 • (559) 456-3292 • FAX (559) 456-3194 www.fresnofloodcontrol.org
File 140.3143
210.81
December 28, 2021
Mr. Mike Harrison, City Engineer
City of Clovis
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612
Dear Mr. Harrison,
Adoption of Resolution Confirming
2022 Schedule of Drainage Costs and Fees
The drainage ordinances of the District, Cities, and County are, as required by Section 66483 of the Government Code, predicated upon adoption of a Resolution, which identifies the actual (or estimated) cost of the planned drainage facilities. Because the development fees imposed pursuant to the Code Section are the same as these costs, the same Resolution serves as the Schedule of Fees.

On December 15, 2021, the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District conducted the prescribed noticed public hearing, in accordance with Government Code Section 6062a, and subsequently approved and adopted the subject schedule of costs. The District provides the required noticing of public hearing to effect the drainage fee update in accordance with law and has in the past suggested that the City may possibly rely on the District notice and hearing, in that they effect the same drainage fee cost schedule, or the City may wish to provide an additional ten (10) day noticing prior to action if it disagrees with this interpretation. No objection to the drainage fee update was presented at the District’s hearing.

The District strives to adopt the fees at the end of the year so they become effective beginning in March of each year in accordance with the Ordinance. Section 66017 of the Government Code requires a 60-day period before the rates take effect. Therefore, the drainage fees, with no further changes in the rates become effective on March 1, 2022 based on the District’s adoption of the Resolution on December 15, 2021.
k:\letters\drainage fee letters\clovis\2022 fee adoption ltr-city clovis.docx 89 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
k:\letters\drainage fee letters\clovis\2022 fee adoption ltr-city clovis.docx Mr. Mike Harrison
Adoption of Resolution Confirming
Schedule of Drainage Costs and Fees
December 28, 2021

Page 2 ends

It is requested that the attached Resolution identifying drainage costs and fees, as provided by the Drainage Fee Ordinance of the City of Clovis, be pre sented to the City of Clovis Council for adoption at the earliest possible date. To assist in expediting this matter, District staff has attached a Draft Resolution, the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map (Exhibit “A”) and the 2022 Drainage Fee Schedule which should be included in Clovis’ Resolution to Council. Also attached is the December 15, 2021 District Board Memorandum, which provides a discussion regarding the adoption of the 2022 Drainage Fee Schedule.

Your assistance i s greatly appreciated. If a dditional i nformation is needed, pl ease contact us .

S
incerely,
D
enise Wade
Master Plan Special Projects Manager
D
W/lrl
E
nclosure(s)
c: J
ohn Holt, City of Clovis
Mike Prandini, Building Industry Association
90 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

1 RESOLUTION NO. _____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF CLOVIS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE

STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL MASTER PLAN AND ADOPTING

THE DRAINAGE FEES AND COSTS FOR

ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE JOINT AREA OF THE

CITY OF CLOVIS, CALIFORNIA AND

THE FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
(2022-2023)

WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Clovis has enacted Chapter 7, Title 8 of the Clovis Municipal Code, which ordinance is hereby incorporated herein by this reference, creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging fees for the construction of planned local storm drainage facilities; and
WHEREAS, an amended Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map (Exhibit “A” hereto) specifying public facilities and improvements, existing and proposed, which are necessary to provide drainage service and flood control within the respective local drainage areas specified therein has been presented to the Council of the City of Clovis; and WHEREAS, a study has been conducted of the impacts of contemplated future development on the existing storm drainage se rvices and facilities in the local drainage areas of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (“District”) and the City of Clovis (“City”) listed in Exhibit “B” attached hereto, along with an analysis of new, improved or expanded public facilities, the estimated costs of those improvements, and the schedule of per gross acre fees calculated to raise the sum of money necessary to pay the estimated total cost of said local drainage in said local drainage areas; and

91 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

2 WHEREAS, this study was available at the District's office for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public meeting and notice was given in compliance with the requirements therefore, and
WHEREAS, a public meeting was held pursuant to the public notice cited herein at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Council of the City of Clovis; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Clovis finds as follows:

A. The purpose of said fees is to finance facilities within the City and District required for the removal of surface and stor m waters attributable to development; to obviate the menace to the public health, safety and welfare arising from inadequate provision for removal of surface and storm waters occurring as the result of development of property; to prevent deterioration of property values and impairment of conditions making for desirable residential, commercial or industrial development, as the case may be, which would result from the failure to construct planned local drainage facilities relative to development of property; and to prevent deterioration of public streets and other public facilities which would result from failure to construct planned local drainage facilities concurrently with development.

B. The fees adopted hereby and collected pursuant to Chapter 7, Title 8 of the Clovis Municipal Code and this Resolution are to be used to finance only the public facilities shown on Exhibit “A” hereto within each of the respective local drainage areas identified in Exhibit “B” hereto;
C. After considering said Map and said s tudy and analysis prepared by the District, entitled “Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan”, and that prepared by the City Planning Department entitled “Clovis General Plan,” and the various community and specific plans of the City; and the informa tion and testimony received at this public hearing, the Council 92 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

3 of the City of Clovis approves said Map and said study, and incorporates such herein. The Council further finds that all development in the subject area will generate the need, as described i n this recital, for storm drainage facilities therein, and generates an unmet need for storm drainage facilities and services within the impacted area;
D. There is a need in this described impact area for storm drainage facilities which have not been const ructed or have been constructed; said facilities have been called for in, or are consistent with, the City’s General Plan. D evelopment will contribute its fair share towards these facility costs in those local drainage areas listed in Exhibit “B” through payment of the respective drainage fees set forth therein;
E. The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities and the impacts of the types of development as described i n Exhibit “A” and “B” for which the corresponding fee set forth in Exhibit “B” is charged. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of said fee and the development of the lands in the service area for which the fee is charged, as these reasonabl e relationships or nexuses are described in more detail in the study and Map referred to above; F. The Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and the storm drainage fees set forth in Exhibit “B”, as adopted by Paragraphs 2 and 3 herein below, revise the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan, are in conformity with the City’s General Plan and are in compliance with Section 66483 of the California Government Code.

G. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit “B” are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities and the fee schedule set forth therein is based on said estimates and is to generate fees from development which will not exceed the total of these costs. 93 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

4 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Council of the City of Clovis that:

1. The above recitals are true and correct, and this Council so finds and determines.

2. The Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan is hereby amended to include that Storm Drain and Flood Control Master Plan Map attached hereto as Exhibit “A” as supported by Exhibit “B”.

3. The schedule of drainage fees for those respective local drainage areas listed in Exhibit “B” hereto is hereby adopted as set forth in said Exhibit “B”. The District shall prepare, and provide to the City, a 2022-2023 schedule of drainage fees for each of its local drainage areas, which shall include the fees adopted hereby. Fees shall be paid in accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinances according to said 2022 -2023 drainage f ee schedule.

4. The fee shall be solely used to pay: (a) costs related to the design, administration and construction of the described public storm water facilities; (b) for reimbursing the District for the development's fair share of those costs incurred by the District in the design and construction of the described public storm water facilities; or (c) to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities in each service area where those facilities were beyond that needed to mitigate the i mpacts of the other developers' project or projects and where reimbursement is provided for in the applicable Drainage Fee Ordinance or the Development Impact Fee Ordinance.

94 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

5 5. The District, pursuant to Chapter 7 of Title 8 of the Municipal Code, shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements for which this fee is charged, the continued or expanded need therefore, and the reasonable relationship between such facility needs and the varying types and development. The Manager shall report the findings to the City Council and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed.

6. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66022, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Resolution shall be brought within 120 days of the effective date hereof, which shall be 60 days after the date of adoption hereof. Administrative appeal is a mandatory prerequisite to any such judicial action or proceeding. Such appeal shall be made in writing to the Director of Public Works of the City of Clovis. Such appeal must be made within 60 days after the effective date hereof. The Director shall set the matter for hearing, conduct the hearing and render a decision within 40 days after such appeal is filed.

7. The Ordinance of the City of Clovis has an administrative mechanism whereby a property owner who seeks to develop property within the boundaries of the City of Clovis and the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District can challenge the fees i mposed thereunder only by first paying said fees under protest. Developers of property within the City of Clovis and the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District shall adhere to the applicable ordinance of the City of Clovis under which it is required t hat drainage fees must be paid before development is allowed, and that such fee may be paid under protest.

95 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

6 THE FOREGOING was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on the day of , 2022, by the following vote, to wit;

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DATED:

Mayor City Clerk

96 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map

EXHIBIT “A”

97 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
98 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

City of Clovis

2022 DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 1, 2022

Exhibit “B”

99 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2022 DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE
City of Clovis
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
1 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
100
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
101
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
AQ

BASIN
$1,790
$2,040
$2,560
$3,060
$3,580
$3,830
$4,030
$4,230
$4,230
$4,730
$5,750
$8,360
$8,950
$9,600
$3,855,130
PIPE
$4,880
$5,510
$7,320
$7,950
$8,630
$8,980
$9,270
$9,510
$9,510
$10,200
$10,880
$12,630
$13,370
$14,100
$6,891,230
TOTAL
$6,670
$7,550
$9,880
$11,010
$12,210
$12,810
$13,300
$13,740
$13,740
$14,930
$16,630
$20,990
$22,320
$23,700
$10,746,360
BC

BASIN
$1,820
$2,080
$2,610
$3,120
$3,640
$3,900
$4,100
$4,300
$4,300
$4,810
$5,850
$8,510
$9,110
$9,770
$5,005,980
PIPE
$3,030
$3,430
$4,550
$4,940
$5,370
$5,580
$5,760
$5,910
$5,910
$6,340
$6,760
$7,850
$8,310
$8,760
$6,117,560
TOTAL
$4,850
$5,510
$7,160
$8,060
$9,010
$9,480
$9,860
$10,210
$10,210
$11,150
$12,610
$16,360
$17,420
$18,530
$11,123,540
BT

BASIN
$2,330
$2,650
$3,330
$3,980
$4,660
$4,980
$5,240
$5,490
$5,490
$6,150
$7,470
$10,870
$11,640
$12,480
$4,836,130
PIPE
$4,850
$5,490
$7,280
$7,910
$8,590
$8,930
$9,220
$9,470
$9,470
$10,150
$10,830
$12,570
$13,300
$14,030
$8,899,510
TOTAL
$7,180
$8,140
$10,610
$11,890
$13,250
$13,910
$14,460
$14,960
$14,960
$16,300
$18,300
$23,440
$24,940
$26,510
$13,735,640
BU

BASIN
$550
$630
$790
$940
$1,100
$1,180
$1,240
$1,300
$1,300
$1,450
$1,760
$2,570
$2,750
$2,940
$2,468,350
PIPE
$2,020
$2,280
$3,030
$3,290
$3,580
$3,720
$3,840
$3,940
$3,940
$4,220
$4,500
$5,230
$5,530
$5,840
$5,320,610
TOTAL
$2,570
$2,910
$3,820
$4,230
$4,680
$4,900
$5,080
$5,240
$5,240
$5,670
$6,260
$7,800
$8,280
$8,780
$7,788,960
BW

BASIN
$970
$1,110
$1,390
$1,660
$1,940
$2,080
$2,190
$2,300
$2,300
$2,570
$3,120
$4,540
$4,860
$5,210
$1,211,930
PIPE
$1,090
$1,240
$1,640
$1,780
$1,940
$2,010
$2,080
$2,130
$2,130
$2,290
$2,440
$2,830
$3,000
$3,160
$1,082,900
TOTAL
$2,060
$2,350
$3,030
$3,440
$3,880
$4,090
$4,270
$4,430
$4,430
$4,860
$5,560
$7,370
$7,860
$8,370
$2,294,830
BX

BASIN
$1,550
$1,760
$2,210
$2,650
$3,100
$3,310
$3,480
$3,650
$3,650
$4,090
$4,970
$7,230
$7,740
$8,300
$6,284,770
PIPE
$2,960
$3,340
$4,430
$4,820
$5,230
$5,440
$5,620
$5,770
$5,770
$6,180
$6,590
$7,660
$8,100
$8,540
$9,816,340
TOTAL
$4,510
$5,100
$6,640
$7,470
$8,330
$8,750
$9,100
$9,420
$9,420
$10,270
$11,560
$14,890
$15,840
$16,840
$16,101,110
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n Nos. 2017-864
& 2018-908.

BY2

BASIN
$1,820
$2,070
$2,600
$3,110
$3,640
$3,890
$4,090
$4,290
$4,290
$4,800
$5,840
$8,490
$9,090
$9,750
$4,277,390
PIPE
$7,210
$8,150
$10,820
$11,760
$12,770
$13,270
$13,710
$14,070
$14,070
$15,080
$16,090
$18,680
$19,770
$20,850
$14,222,460
TOTAL
$9,030
$10,220
$13,420
$14,870
$16,410
$17,160
$17,800
$18,360
$18,360
$19,880
$21,930
$27,170
$28,860
$30,600
$18,499,850
BZ

BASIN
$2,830
$3,230
$4,050
$4,850
$5,670
$6,070
$6,380
$6,690
$6,690
$7,480
$9,100
$13,240
$14,170
$15,190
$3,600,920
PIPE
$2,020
$2,280
$3,030
$3,290
$3,570
$3,710
$3,830
$3,930
$3,930
$4,220
$4,500
$5,220
$5,530
$5,830
$2,176,590
TOTAL
$4,850
$5,510
$7,080
$8,140
$9,240
$9,780
$10,210
$10,620
$10,620
$11,700
$13,600
$18,460
$19,700
$21,020
$5,777,510
CL

BASIN
$850
$970
$1,210
$1,450
$1,700
$1,820
$1,910
$2,000
$2,000
$2,240
$2,730
$3,970
$4,250
$4,550
$2,221,940
PIPE
$1,170
$1,330
$1,760
$1,910
$2,080
$2,160
$2,230
$2,290
$2,290
$2,450
$2,620
$3,040
$3,220
$3,390
$2,230,610
TOTAL
$2,020
$2,300
$2,970
$3,360
$3,780
$3,980
$4,140
$4,290
$4,290
$4,690
$5,350
$7,010
$7,470
$7,940
$4,452,550
CZ

BASIN
$550
$620
$780
$940
$1,090
$1,170
$1,230
$1,290
$1,290
$1,440
$1,760
$2,550
$2,740
$2,930
$1,511,580
PIPE
$1,260
$1,420
$1,880
$2,050
$2,220
$2,310
$2,380
$2,450
$2,450
$2,620
$2,800
$3,250
$3,440
$3,630
$2,786,520
TOTAL
$1,810
$2,040
$2,660
$2,990
$3,310
$3,480
$3,610
$3,740
$3,740
$4,060
$4,560
$5,800
$6,180
$6,560
$4,298,100
DL

BASIN
$2,750
$3,130
$3,930
$4,690
$5,490
$5,880
$6,180
$6,480
$6,480
$7,250
$8,810
$12,820
$13,730
$14,720
$3,199,720
PIPE
$4,760
$5,380
$7,140
$7,760
$8,420
$8,760
$9,040
$9,280
$9,280
$9,950
$10,610
$12,320
$13,040
$13,750
$3,896,570
TOTAL
$7,510
$8,510
$11,070
$12,450
$13,910
$14,640
$15,220
$15,760
$15,760
$17,200
$19,420
$25,140
$26,770
$28,470
$7,096,290
DM

BASIN
$2,070
$2,360
$2,960
$3,530
$4,130
$4,420
$4,650
$4,880
$4,880
$5,460
$6,640
$9,650
$10,340
$11,080
$5,060,300
PIPE
$6,730
$7,610
$10,100
$10,980
$11,920
$12,390
$12,800
$13,130
$13,130
$14,080
$15,020
$17,440
$18,450
$19,460
$13,593,740
TOTAL
$8,800
$9,970
$13,060
$14,510
$16,050
$16,810
$17,450
$18,010
$18,010
$19,540
$21,660
$27,090
$28,790
$30,540
$18,654,040
DO

BASIN
$1,990
$2,260
$2,840
$3,400
$3,970
$4,250
$4,470
$4,690
$4,690
$5,240
$6,380
$9,280
$9,930
$10,650
$6,058,270
PIPE
$2,950
$3,340
$4,430
$4,810
$5,230
$5,430
$5,610
$5,760
$5,760
$6,170
$6,580
$7,650
$8,090
$8,530
$6,993,820
TOTAL
$4,940
$5,600
$7,270
$8,210
$9,200
$9,680
$10,080
$10,450
$10,450
$11,410
$12,960
$16,930
$18,020
$19,180
$13,052,090
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n Nos. 2007-522,
2014-806, 2018-
887, 2018-908, &
2020-959
3 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
102
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
DP

BASIN
$1,830
$2,080
$2,610
$3,130
$3,660
$3,910
$4,110
$4,310
$4,310
$4,830
$5,870
$8,540
$9,140
$9,800
$6,826,920
PIPE
$6,300
$7,120
$9,450
$10,260
$11,150
$11,590
$11,960
$12,280
$12,280
$13,160
$14,040
$16,310
$17,250
$18,200
$17,510,400
TOTAL
$8,130
$9,200
$12,060
$13,390
$14,810
$15,500
$16,070
$16,590
$16,590
$17,990
$19,910
$24,850
$26,390
$28,000
$24,337,320
DQ

BASIN
$6,430
$7,330
$9,190
$10,990
$12,860
$13,760
$14,470
$15,170
$15,170
$16,970
$20,640
$30,020
$32,150
$34,460
$5,304,770
PIPE
$5,410
$6,110
$8,120
$8,820
$9,580
$9,960
$10,280
$10,550
$10,550
$11,310
$12,070
$14,020
$14,830
$15,640
$3,842,840
TOTAL
$11,840
$13,440
$17,310
$19,810
$22,440
$23,720
$24,750
$25,720
$25,720
$28,280
$32,710
$44,040
$46,980
$50,100
$9,147,610
1G

BASIN
$1,330
$1,330
$1,670
$1,990
$2,330
$2,500
$2,620
$2,750
$2,750
$3,080
$3,740
$5,450
$5,830
$6,250
$1,660,870
PIPE
$1,380
$1,380
$1,830
$1,980
$2,150
$2,240
$2,310
$2,370
$2,370
$2,540
$2,710
$3,150
$3,330
$3,520
$1,541,159
TOTAL
$2,710
$2,710
$3,500
$3,970
$4,480
$4,740
$4,930
$5,120
$5,120
$5,620
$6,450
$8,600
$9,160
$9,770
$3,202,029
3G

BASIN
$2,130
$2,430
$3,050
$3,650
$4,270
$4,560
$4,800
$5,030
$5,030
$5,630
$6,850
$9,960
$10,670
$11,430
$4,649,160
PIPE
$2,260
$2,560
$3,390
$3,690
$4,010
$4,160
$4,300
$4,410
$4,410
$4,730
$5,050
$5,860
$6,200
$6,540
$4,154,740
TOTAL
$4,390
$4,990
$6,440
$7,340
$8,280
$8,720
$9,100
$9,440
$9,440
$10,360
$11,900
$15,820
$16,870
$17,970
$8,803,900
7C

BASIN
$1,950
$2,230
$2,790
$3,340
$3,910
$4,180
$4,400
$4,610
$4,610
$5,160
$6,270
$9,120
$9,770
$10,470
$3,835,680
PIPE
$1,230
$1,390
$1,840
$2,000
$2,170
$2,260
$2,330
$2,390
$2,390
$2,570
$2,740
$3,180
$3,360
$3,550
$1,731,900
TOTAL
$3,180
$3,620
$4,630
$5,340
$6,080
$6,440
$6,730
$7,000
$7,000
$7,730
$9,010
$12,300
$13,130
$14,020
$5,567,580
7D

BASIN
$2,140
$2,440
$3,060
$3,660
$4,290
$4,590
$4,820
$5,060
$5,060
$5,660
$6,880
$10,010
$10,710
$11,480
$3,756,650
PIPE
$1,830
$2,060
$2,740
$2,980
$3,230
$3,360
$3,470
$3,560
$3,560
$3,820
$4,070
$4,730
$5,010
$5,280
$2,216,710
TOTAL
$3,970
$4,500
$5,800
$6,640
$7,520
$7,950
$8,290
$8,620
$8,620
$9,480
$10,950
$14,740
$15,720
$16,760
$5,973,360
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n Nos. 2005-480
& 2018-908.
7H

BASIN
$2,290
$2,610
$3,280
$3,920
$4,580
$4,900
$5,150
$5,410
$5,410
$6,050
$7,350
$10,700
$11,450
$12,280
$5,192,980
PIPE
$4,590
$5,180
$6,880
$7,480
$8,120
$8,440
$8,710
$8,940
$8,940
$9,590
$10,230
$11,880
$12,570
$13,250
$7,363,960
TOTAL
$6,880
$7,790
$10,160
$11,400
$12,700
$13,340
$13,860
$14,350
$14,350
$15,640
$17,580
$22,580
$24,020
$25,530
$12,556,940
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n Nos. 2005-480
& 2018-908.
4 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
103
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Area
Basin Cost
Pipe Cost
Total
OO
$2,241,180
$790,011
$3,031,191
PP
$1,827,799
$1,220,346
$3,048,145
RR
$5,178,163
$18,328,132
$23,506,295
SS
$2,525,088
$3,296,790
$5,821,878
TT
$1,959,614
$1,599,471
$3,559,085
UU1
$474,282
$1,155,629
$1,629,911
UU2
$1,590,601
$1,686,286
$3,276,887
UU3
$3,419,421
$9,617,554
$13,036,975
VV
$34,124
$116,961
$151,085
WW
$18,653
$360,044
$378,697
XX
$1,025,092
$2,174,474
$3,199,566
ZZ
$2,565,696
$2,869,195
$5,434,891
Planned Local Drianage Areas: Zone 2
Area
Basin Cost
Pipe Cost
Total
X
$1,839,287
$448,581
$2,287,868
Y
$1,175,737
$2,265,162
$3,440,899
Z
$1,121,879
$2,525,668
$3,647,547
**
AA
$978,116
$1,343,241
$2,321,357
BB
$499,109
$822,774
$1,321,883
CC
$465,921
$2,085,168
$2,551,089
CO2
$904,070
$1,424,260
$2,328,330
DD
$1,896,981
$7,725,461
$9,622,442
EE
$754,118
$3,358,704
$4,112,822
FF
$1,433,799
$9,604,610
$11,038,409
GG
$2,485,389
$1,539,639
$4,025,028
HH
$4,200,015
$5,506,475
$9,706,490
II1
$4,819,438
$16,627,228
$21,446,666
II2
$7,945,847
$1,306,882
$9,252,729
II3
$1,745,301
$1,672,599
$3,417,900
II4
$2,259,789
$1,113,110
$3,372,899
JJ
$2,039,095
$3,846,098
$5,885,193
KK
$1,999,167
$1,486,803
$3,485,970
LL
$2,283,613
$3,412,009
$5,695,622
MM
$567,301
$944,465
$1,511,766
Area
Basin Cost
Pipe Cost
Total
A
$2,299,010
$1,716,030
$4,015,040
B
$1,050,726
$142,170
$1,192,896
C
$479,953
$317,414
$797,367
D
$801,395
$694,153
$1,495,548
E
$777,422
$228,063
$1,005,485
F
$284,535
$302,016
$586,551
G
$1,153,808
$157,007
$1,310,815
H
$99,858
$214,682
$314,540
I
$227,828
$248,025
$475,853
J
$1,682,005
$435,847
$2,117,852
K
$1,040,301
$677,207
$1,717,508
L
$662,320
$494,850
$1,157,170
M
$967,464
$257,885
$1,225,349
N
$482,052
$434,159
$916,211
O
$1,046,970
$190,138
$1,237,108
P
$884,478
$277,552
$1,162,030
T
$1,731,054
$2,463,036
$4,194,090
U
$1,454,875
$672,938
$2,127,813
V
$660,035
$1,726,395
$2,386,430
W
$1,934,684
$3,474,333
$5,409,017
*
W
* Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution No. 885-BPBR.

Z
** Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution Nos. 1227, 1265, 1268, 1386.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 2: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
Zone 2
BASIN
$750
$850
$1,070
$1,280
$1,490
$1,600
$1,680
$1,760
$1,760
$1,970
$2,390
$3,480
$3,730
$4,000
$83,994,458
PIPE
$1,610
$1,820
$2,420
$2,630
$2,850
$2,970
$3,060
$3,140
$3,140
$3,370
$3,590
$4,180
$4,420
$4,660
$127,397,730
TOTAL
$2,360
$2,670
$3,490
$3,910
$4,340
$4,570
$4,740
$4,900
$4,900
$5,340
$5,980
$7,660
$8,150
$8,660
$211,392,188
5 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
104
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Planned Local Drianage Areas: Zone 3
Area
Basin Cost
Pipe Cost
Total
Q
$393,027
$411,805
$804,832
S
$1,310,299
$2,270,780
$3,581,079
1E
$2,104,757
$933,226
$3,037,983
2D
$831,893
$1,423,085
$2,254,978
3A
$1,332,641
$913,853
$2,246,494
3D
$1,427,625
$1,032,196
$2,459,821
3F
$1,105,476
$1,224,524
$2,330,000
4B
$1,549,023
$988,399
$2,537,422
4C
$1,144,187
$2,383,951
$3,528,138
4D
$3,623,973
$1,032,287
$4,656,260
4E
$3,631,939
$2,148,572
$5,780,511
5B/5C
$4,484,990
$2,231,625
$6,716,615
5F
$1,589,077
$1,530,399
$3,119,476
6D
$1,458,901
$1,586,892
$3,045,793
Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 3: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
Zone 3
BASIN
$1,410
$1,600
$2,010
$2,410
$2,820
$3,010
$3,170
$3,320
$3,320
$3,720
$4,520
$6,570
$7,040
$7,550
$25,987,808
PIPE
$1,520
$1,720
$2,280
$2,480
$2,690
$2,800
$2,890
$2,970
$2,970
$3,180
$3,400
$3,940
$4,170
$4,400
$20,111,594
TOTAL
$2,930
$3,320
$4,290
$4,890
$5,510
$5,810
$6,060
$6,290
$6,290
$6,900
$7,920
$10,510
$11,210
$11,950
$46,099,402
6 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
105
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR SURCHARGE AREAS: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
W

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$11,075
-
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 885-BPBR

Z

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$1,970
$2,110
$2,250
$2,615
$5,380
$2,915
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1386

BX

TOTAL
-
$270
$360
$390
$430
$445
$445
$445
$470
$510
$540
$630
$660
$700
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2008-590

BX

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$14,310
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2017-884

CM

TOTAL
$90
$105
$135
$145
$160
$165
$165
$165
$175
$185
$200
$235
$485
$260
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1228

CN

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$2,200
$2,395
$2,695
$3,465
$3,690
$3,925
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1422

DE

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
$790
$790
$790
$840
$900
-
$1,120
$1,250
$1,250
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2006-486

DN

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
$11,270
$11,640
$11,940
$11,940
-
-
-
-
$17,700
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2017-884

DO

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$4,350
$4,350
$4,660
$4,660
-
$6,110
$6,440
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2018-887

DO

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$4,140
$4,140
-
-
$5,720
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2020-959

7D

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$5,555
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2005-480

7H

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$5,555
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2005-480

7 of 8
2022 FMFCD
3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022
City of Clovis
106
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8 of 82022 FMFCD3/2022
Effective Date: 3/1/2022City of Clovis
107
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

MEMORANDUM
File 140. 3123, 140. 3133, 140. 3143
BOARD MEETING: December 15, 2021
AGENDA ITEM NO.: 8. A.

FROM: Brent Sunamoto, District Engineer- Assistant General Manager SUBJECT: Storm Drainage Master Plan and Drainage Fee Schedule Update: Adoption of Resolution Amending the Storm
Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan and Amending the Schedule of Drainage Fees, Surcharges, and Costs for Local Drainage Areas ( 2022 Rate Schedule)
Summary
Urban storm drainage systemsare funded by the payment of drainage fees at the time of development. Feesin the original areaof the District or core areaof the City of Fresno (Zone 2) are calculated at a uniform rate by spreadingthe aggregateof eachsystem's total cost to the entire original area. The core areaof the City of Clovis (Zone 3) utilizes the same approach. Zone 2 is unique in that the aggregate approach was intended to distribute the benefits of the long-term tax payments and early formation and subsidiesvia assessment districts. All other areasreferred to asthe "Full Cost" zone (Zone 1) are funded by spreading the individual system cost to its respective local drainage area. The zones are shown on the attached Exhibit No. 1.

Exhibit No. 2 depicts the proposed amendmentsto certain drainage and surchargefee schedules for March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2023. Adoption of the attachedresolution amending the Master Plan and amending the fee schedulein certain drainageareasis necessaryto formally make changes to those drainage areas and increase the fee rate.

The updated Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map (Exhibit A) is also attached for review andreference. A Public Hearing is required to increasedrainage fee ratesand the appropriatepublic notice regarding this Hearing was published in the FresnoBee pursuant to the Government Code. Fee schedules are updated annually to become effective not less than sixty 60) days after adoption.

Zone 1
With respectto Zone 1, eighty-seven (87) drainage areaswarrant a fee amendment. Modification of systemcostssignificant enoughto justify a revision to the drainage fee schedules include: ( i) increased unit prices for pipelines, manholes, inlets, arterial streetpaving, curb & gutter, sidewalk, basin sprinkler& turf, water capacity fee (Fresno), water grid main andwell charge (Clovis), CEQA site assessment& appraisal, pump station& completion, and reclaimed pump; (ii) re-planned land usedensity changesdue to General Plan updates; and( iii) increasedbasin land costs. The drainage areasaffected by the modifications are set forth in Exhibit No. 2. The list displays land useof the greatestacreagein eachof the

Page 1 of 4 ends

V

FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
Capturing Stormwater since 1956. 108
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

BOARD MEETING: December 15, 2021
AGENDA ITEM NO.: 8. A.
respective local drainage areas as representative of the adjustments or rate change. The comment column indicates the type of adjustment associated with the 2022 Drainage Fee Amendments and Surcharge Fee Adjustments.

Also, this year' s study indicated that drainage fee rates for eleven ( 11) Zone 1 drainage areas remain the sameor showeda slight decrease. Basedupon previous staff reviews, it is normally recommended that downward adjustments not be made due to the anticipated drainage fee revenue falling short of the total systemcostswithin many of the full cost drainage areas. A decreasein the fee rate for Zone 1 areasmust be supportedby a fee audit for the specific area. The audit is necessaryto evaluatethe outcome of the total system coststo determine, ultimately, if the funding collected will be lessor more than the cost to complete the full cost Zone 1 drainage systems. This year's audit doesnot support a decreasein the remaining Zone 1 areas. Staff will continually monitor these areas and report its findings to the Board should a decrease in fees be warranted in the future.

Staff is aware of a recent bid in Drainage Area " CD" for Contract " CD- 4" and anticipates an additional cost adjustment is needed for this zone within the next month. Contract " CD- 4" bids were significantly lower than the anticipated Master Plan costs. Staff will requestthe Board schedulea separatepublic hearing to give the public the appropriate time to comment.

Zone 2 and Zone 3
With respect to Zone 2 and Zone 3 areas, unit cost updates warrant a fee adjustment. The percentageincreaseis shown in Exhibit No. 2.

Surcharge Areas
Review of the fee ratesidentified five ( 5) existing surchargeDrainage Areas; "BX" RT Park, DO" Southeast Urban, " DO" Loma Vista Community South , "DN" Copper River Ranch, and 7D"/" 7H" RT Park have warranted fee adjustments ( see Exhibit No. 3). The fee increases in these areas resulted from unit cost updates and contract adjustments. Exhibit No. 3 also shows the per acre costsresulting from these surchargefee adjustments.

Staff hasposted the 2022 amendmentsto the fee scheduleon the District' s website, circulated the proposed changesto the Building Industry Association( BIA) for comment, and informed the BIA of the public hearing date. The proposed changesin the fee schedulewere also presentedto the BIA at a regularly scheduledBIA/ District liaison meeting on Wednesday, October 6, 2021. It was requestedthat the BIA make formal commentson the proposal for this year's adjustmentsprior to the public hearing. No commentshave beenreceived at the writing of this memorandum. In the past, BIA hasbeennon-committal andtaken no position in regards to drainage fee adjustments. Following the District' s adoption of the 2022 amendments to the Drainage Fee Schedule, staff will requesteachof the local jurisdictional agenciesadopt the amendments.

The adoption of fees is considereda project under the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA). Staff has evaluatedthe potential environmental impact of the adoption of thesefees and hasdetermined that the action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public ResourcesCode Section 21080( b)( 8)( D). This section exemptsthe modification of feescollected by public agencies for the purpose of obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain service within existing service areas. Pursuantto Section 21080(b)(8)(D), staff recommends the Board

Page 2 of 4 ends

109
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

BOARD MEETING: December 15, 2021
AGENDA ITEM NO.: 8. A.
incorporate findings in the record that the proposedamendmentsto the drainage fees are exempt from CEQA.

Recommendation
Staff recommendsthat the Board of Directors adoptthe following:

1. Adopt the attachedResolution updating the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map and amendthe proposed cost and fee schedulesas setforth therein.

2. Direct staff to transmit the map and fee schedule amendments to the City of Fresno, City of Clovis, and the County of Fresno for adoption.

3. Find that adoption of said Resolutions that adopts fees are exempt from further CEQA assessmentper provisions of Public ResourcesCode Section 21080(b)(8)(D).

Discussion
The proposed drainage fee amendments, shown on Exhibit No. 2, comply with the Government Code that requires the local agencyto determine that the feesare fairly apportioned within the local drainage areaseither on the basis of benefits conferred on the property proposed for subdivision or on the need for such facilities createdby the proposed subdivision and development of other property within such areas. In Zones 1 thru 3, feesare fairly apportioned basedon the needto capture, manageand store storm water runoff as determinedby land use and anticipated impervious area.

Staff continually monitors systemcosts asimprovements areconstructedyearly. By monitoring systemcosts, staff is able to make the necessaryadjustmentsto the drainagefee automation program which re-calculatesthe drainagefee schedulesimmediately when new information is input into the accounting data and/or modifications are made to the GIS system. This process requires the comparing of actual contract unit costswith the current fee study unit costsaswell as insight from building contractorswithin the metropolitan area. With the useof actual costs the District is able to ensurethe unit costsare current with the market and better re-coup funding for updatedsystemcostswithout relying on the useof the General fund. While adjustmentsto drainagefees are generally consideredonly once eachyear pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance, the automatedprogram allows for staff to view the effect on the future drainage fee rate schedule after any system modification.

To keep current with facility unit costs, the adjustmentswarranted for 2022 include an increase in the following: pipe with and without trench resurfacing (40%), jacked pipe (averaged 134%), manholes ( 13%), inlets ( 7. 9%), arterial street paving( 33%), curb & gutter( 33%), sidewalk 33%), basin sprinkler& turf( 13%), Fresnowater capacity fee (4.8%), Clovis water grid main and well charge ( 1. 8%), CEQA site assessment& appraisal ( 15%), pump station & completion 10%), reclaimed pump proposed( 12.5%), andreclaimed pump existing ( 10%).

Review of the fee ratesidentified five ( 5) existing surchargeareasin Drainage Areas "BX", DO", " DN", and " 7D"/" 7H" warranted fee adjustments. The fee rate increases in these areas resulted from unit cost updatesand contract adjustments. The District had initially intended to adopt a new surcharge in Drainage Area " CD" for Granville Homes, the developer of Parc West Development (project). However, at the writing of this memorandum, staff was made awareof a recent bid, Contract " CD- 4", for the developersproject that was substantially lower than the anticipated Master Plan costs. Staff will requestthe Board schedulea separatepublic hearing to

Page 3 of 4 ends

110
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

BOARD MEETING: December 15, 2021
AGENDA ITEM NO.: 8. A.
allow staff the appropriate time to analyze the bids and provide the developer time to review the proposed fee amendmentand surchargerates. The separatepublic hearing will include a resolution Amending the Storm Drainage andFlood Control Master Plan and Amending the Schedule of Drainage Fees, Surcharges and Costs for Local Drainage Area " CD" ( 2022 Rate Schedule).

The 2022 drainage fee rate study reviews all drainage areas utilizing the adjusted unit costs along with accounting datafor existing facilities. The existing drainage ordinancesrequire annual updating of the drainage systemcost schedules. This processassuresfees arebasedon actual costs, ensuresequity among all fee payers, assuresreimbursement of those incurring construction costsin excessor their proportionate cost share, andprotects the generaltaxpayer from the needto pay development subsidies.

Pursuantto the Government Code, the fee increasesbecome effective not lessthan sixty( 60) days following adoption. Therefore, if adopted, the effective date of the drainage fee rate schedule would be March 1, 2022 in accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinance.

Respectfully submitted by:

De/ wiis-eeWade, Master ? Lowy Speoict, LProject/ Ma/ v cje Attachments

1. Public Hearing Procedural Outline

2. Exhibit No. 1

3. Exhibit No. 2

4. Exhibit A

5. Exhibit No. 3

6. Resolution Amending Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan and Amending Schedule of Drainage Fees, Surcharges and Costs for Local Drainage Areas

Page 4 of 4 ends

111
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

DN
DM
DE
COPPER
i• DL
wBZ
AQ
BY2
BY

LOVIS BEHYMERIONAL

FRESNO DK R
PERRIN
BC
r.

SHEPHERD
41 CX BX
TEAGUE
NEES
EK F
Icoijir Ii

ALLUVIAL
EG
ligaiD
6 HERNDON
it"
ACADp N O ,
I DlhiOdbmiiQ
SIERRA
lailir
0 BOLLARDDOa 0 BARSTOW
DApii.,,,
En
ill
p HAW
DD DO
TillETTYSBURGEOy of 4
DP
CD
j 7 I
tic
I
ASHCAN
1 ii
NV
Q
1 DAKOTA

IPIIISHIELDS
CG

AN CC DS CLINTON
A A
McKINLEY
lir CK AO
i f1 /.

BQ
OLIVE
1 1

BELMONT
TULARE
AJam41,
1 KINGSCANYON
9 ri
DV
BUTLER
00 CALIFORNIA
lopi `
i
f. CHURCH
CP BL

BD JENSEN
AUi '.

ANNADALE
i w cui NORTH
CQ AW
111
MUSCAT

CENTRAL
0 di
ce
It Mill

AMERICAN
w
W
aac
1-I Q
W
Z QU
Z
0 J J W z m H J >- W Z
Q
N K d' 2' J Z dw I- z in W W J ~ rn w D z 0 W I J
LL z 4 W 1 z = w Y = w j
z i >
ce (
z <
a w 0 Z p z . co w U >
O
z
0i O
a
Q Q = d' Q M J 2 Q
W Q 2 J D O d' W O W W 2 U
O (.) m 2 d OUm m > > 2 W W U W U U > U 2i 0 > U ( n W Q H J 0 J 2 F >

O FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
Exhibit No. 1
Drainage Fee Zones 0 City Sphere Lines
I I Zone 1 Drainage Areas
Zone 2
Zone 3
a
I7 li Exempt
Prepared by: rebeccal
Date: 12/ 3/ 2021
Path: I:\ Projects\ Exhibits\ Fees2022\ Maps\ FeeMaps2022. aprx 1: 165, 000 112
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2022 DRAINAGE FEE AMENDMENTS
Drainage Areas Within Zone 1 ( Full Percent Majority
Cost Areas) Change Zone Use Comments
1 " R"( Chestnut and Shepherd) 0. 94 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 2 " AB"( Marks and Palo Alto) 2. 10 R- 1- B Unit Cost Update 3 " AD"( Valentine and Bullard) 4. 11 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 4 " AE"( Valentine and Barstow) 6. 59 R- 2 Unit Cost Update 5 " AF"( Valentine andGettysburg) 7. 72 C- 2 Unit Cost Update 6 " AG"( Valentine and Ashlan) 14. 77 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 7 " AH"( Cornelia and Gettysburg) 8. 80 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 8 " AI"( Blythe and Belmont) 7. 84 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 9 " AJ"( Polk and Ashlan) 5. 47 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 10 " AK"( Polk and Shields) 14. 16 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 11 " AL"( Brawley and Weldon) 15. 41 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 12 " AN"( Cornelia and Hedges) 9. 08 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 13 " AO"( Blythe and Belmont) 28. 50 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 14 " AQ"( Willow and Perrin) 23. 67 R- 2 Unit Cost Update 15 " AR"( Cornelia and Whites Bridge) + 28. 17 M- 1 Unit Cost Update, Basin Cost Update 16 " AS"( Valentine and California) 28. 97 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update, Re-planned Density 17 " AU"( West and Annadale) 24. 56 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update, Basin Cost Update 18 " AV"( Fig and Central) 35. 99 M- 3 Unit Cost Update, Basin Cost Update 19 " AW1"( Orange and North) 30. 83 M- 3 Unit Cost Update 20 " AW2"( Cherry and North) 6. 49 M- 3 Unit Cost Update 21 " AY"( Cedar and Central) 22. 80 M- 3 Unit Cost Update 22 " AZ"( Chestnut and Muscat) 16. 84 M- 3 Unit Cost Update 23 " BC"( Willow and Teague) 12. 99 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 24 " BD"( Willow and Vine) 18. 85 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 25 " BE"( Willow and Belgravia) 22. 64 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update Exhibit No. 2

Page 1 ends

113
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2022 DRAINAGE FEE AMENDMENTS
Drainage Areas Within Zone 1( Full Percent Majority
Cost Areas) Change Zone Use Comments
26 " BF"( Chestnut and Church) 9. 70 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 27 " BG"( Peach and Annadale) 16. 80 M- 3 Unit Cost Update 28 " BH"( Clovis and Church) 19. 46 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 29 " BJ"( Maple and Golden State) 20. 46 M- 3 Unit Cost Update 30 " BK"( Clovis and Montecito) 19. 31 C- 5 Unit Cost Update 31 " BL"( Armstrong and Church) 18. 81 C- 1 Unit Cost Update, Re-planned Density 32 " BM"( Fowler and Butler) 12. 21 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 33 " BO"( Sunnyside and Mckenzie) 10. 26 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 34 " BP"( Sunnyside and Harvey) 17. 92 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 35 " BQ"( Fowler and Belmont) 11. 01 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 36 " BR"( Clovis and Olive) 21. 11 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 37 " BS"( Fowler and Floradora) 20. 42 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 38 " BT"( Sunnyside and Nees) 15. 72 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 39 " BU"( Clovis and Clinton) 18. 72 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 40 " By"( Fowler and Shields) 1. 77 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 41 " BX"( Temperance and Nees) 5. 04 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 42 " BY1"( Sunnyside and Behymer) 17. 94 RR Unit Cost Update 43 " BY2"( Sunnyside and Behymer) 27. 21 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 44 " BZ"( Cedar and Copper) 3. 27 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 45 " CE"( Maple and American) 31. 45 M- 3 Unit Cost Update 46 " CF"( Peach and Central) 31. 03 M- 3 Unit Cost Update 47 " CG"( Garfield and McKinley) 29. 05 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update, Basin Cost Update 48 " CH"( Bryan and McKinley) 29. 47 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update, Basin Cost Update 49 " CP"( Polk and Mckinley) 9. 99 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update Exhibit No. 2

Page 2 of 5 ends

114
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2022 DRAINAGE FEE AMENDMENTS
Drainage Areas Within Zone 1( Full Percent Majority
Cost Areas) Change Zone Use Comments
50 " CJ"( Grantland and Belmont) 29. 28 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update, Basin Cost Update 51 " CK"( Polk and Belmont) 28. 13 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update, Basin Cost Update 52 " CL"( Willow and Escalon) 2. 84 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 53 " CM"( Cedar and Herndon) 1. 93 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 54 " CN"( Fresno and Herndon) 1. 48 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 55 " CP"( Marks and Jensen) 27. 11 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update, Basin Cost Update 56 " CQ"( Walnut and North) 18. 21 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 57 " CS"( Minnewawa and North) 30. 52 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 58 " CU"( Willow and North) 23. 88 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 59 " CV"( Willow and Central) 14. 07 M- 3 Unit Cost Update 60 " CW"( Fresno and Nees) 3. 42 R- 1- C Unit Cost Update 61 " CX"( Nees and Ninth) 1. 06 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 62 " CY"( Cedar and Alluvial) 2. 02 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 63 " CZ"( Chestnut and Alluvial) 2. 05 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 64 " DE"( Cedar and Copper) 1. 83 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 65 " DK"( Friant and Champlain) 14. 07 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 66 " DL"( International and Minnewawa) + 21. 59 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 67 " DM"( Peach and Copper) 27. 83 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 68 " DN"( Friant and Willow) 12. 32 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 69 " DO"( Locan and Ashlan) 7. 80 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 70 " DP"( Highland and Dakota) 20. 16 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 71 " DQ"( Leonard and Sierra) 13. 49 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update, Basin Cost Update 72 " DS"( Leonard and Clinton) 26. 73 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 73 " DV"( Temperance and Kings Canyon) + 26. 54 C- 1 Unit Cost Update 74 " EF"( Cornelia and Dante) 11. 42 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update Exhibit No. 2

Page 3 of 5 ends

115
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2022 DRAINAGE FEE AMENDMENTS
Drainage Areas Within Zone 1 ( Full Percent Majority
Cost Areas) Change Zone Use Comments
75 " EG"( Sandrini and Spruce) 1. 16 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 76 " EH"( Herndon and Grantland) 9. 46 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 77 " EI"( Weber and Spruce) 24. 52 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 78 " EJ"( Garfield and Sample) 23. 30 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 79 " EK"( Bluff and Santa Fe) 4. 30 R- 1- C Unit Cost Update 80 " EL"( Barcus and Barstow) 7. 42 M- 1 Unit Cost Update 81 " EM"( Grantland and Barstow) 8. 50 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 82 " EN"( Garfield and Gettysburg) 16. 36 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update, Re- planned Density 83 " EO"( Bryan and Dakota) 14. 71 R- 1- 40 Unit CostUpdate, Re-plannedDensity 84 " NN"( Valentine and Church) 9. 32 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 85 " 7C"( Clovis and Alluvial) 1. 42 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 86 " 7D"( Fowler and Alluvial) 5. 03 R- 1- C Unit Cost Update 87 " 7H"( Temperance and Bullard) 21. 05 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update 88 ZONE 2 AREAS 5. 54 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update
89 ZONE 3 AREAS 3. 57 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update
2022 SURCHARGE FEE ADJUSTMENTS
Percent Majority
Surcharge Areas Change Zone Use Comments
1 " BX"( Temperance and Owens) 35. 90 C- P, C- M, R- P Unit Cost Update 2 " DN"( Friant and Willow) 5. 82 R- 1- 40 Unit Cost Update, Contract Adjustment 3 " DO"( Leonard and Ashlan) 18. 21 R- 1- 50 Unit Cost Update, Contract Adjustment 4 " DO"( Loma Vista Community South) + 18. 18 C- 1 Unit Cost Update, Contract Adjustment 5 " 7D"( Temperance and Alluvial) 52. 15 C- 1 Unit Cost Update Exhibit No. 2

Page 4 of 5 ends

116
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
i
DM
Itr.' COPPER
i' r
DE
I
I , ,/ -- —
DL

BY, CLOVIS

INTERNATIONAL

BZ -
BY2 BEHYMER
FRESNO
AO i
DK R i PERRIN
BC

SHEPHERD
41 I k•_. r
CX '_ I `(
ax TEAGUE
ri* 4;/..:
i _
f b rr
n - '.' .`- j
CY
CZ
r___ E
NEES
fr
EK
F DGt DH
CN „_ ...._.. ,...__ 7D ALLUVIAL
r
C01 CO2I I7C^ -- °
r

1. EGA-- . _ AB 3
j: __ •
CMe-__. ._ 46 HERNDON
EJ IiI
EHxL4? f
AC
AD,r fj J I
rH N O P
CL QJ 7H SIERRA
t. z_. J- or DO BULLARD
J_,EM;-
w,. ,"-.
2-
E
D
F
L M ca y BARSTOW
EN AFC
K t,..
@ SHAW
AH r
i'
H .
r MM DD ' '
B
C Q r) DO

ETTYSBURG
i AJ AG ) a E 1G DP
EO } Y_,••••;, ._..; ice, ASHCAN
S AK BB U —
liar
DAKOTA
i - Vi, r vv yyyy T " 7- By

COSHIELDS
CH , C
AL
EE
UU2
UU1 {
CC
JJ
V •%
I
BU
BS

DS CLINTON
McKINLEY1 , I a
r
AO _ RR gla G I` WaBRL-I---r OLIVE
CJ ; CK f UU34 refs, a gpQ
xry '* f` BELMONT
TULARE
AR
18 : sr; y r .

FF / BK4.-- \ ^ D- -

KINGSCANYON
AS F% LL A

BM BUTLER
NN
Slz,
00 1 GG 1- Y
4 CALIFORNIA
111 112 t_.
gE
1•
1 BH 1____--,,,,-r
r TT BF 1 ri BL
CHURCH
CP u- BD rBG`‘ -1 JENSEN
Illrill
SSSS
AU KK- LL O HH ___.

1.-----)

ANNADALE
L
I
rr ®
W1

CO '
LAW > i- r
NORTH
AVL.
rA CS
AX AY BJ` CiCVj
MUSCAT
ce

CENTRAL
i 41
re %.'''----:

MALAGA
R

AMERICAN
w
QQo
w
OJ
5 a } Z
co F- -
J
w a O O ¢ZQ
J d'
0 w w =
z m w D z m Co = w z w N > w - w z O a a
a. <
y z I 3 w S = t= Z r- z¢ a - m o z > z w a s z E 1 a O O g ' ¢ E w r a _ 2 K W ¢ 2 J w Z O C W O w W EaF),_ O Co c9 m x a O m m > 2 I 3 LL 3 E w U wO O 2 O 3 a 2 O m LL a r M o - = f- 2 air

FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
Exhibit No. 2
Zone 1, 2022 Drainage Fee Amendments IIM SurchargeAreasBX, DO, DN, 7D Zone 2, 2022 Drainage Fee Amendments Drainage Areas
IL., Zone 3, 2022 Drainage Fee Amendments (%////, Exempt City Sphere Lines
Prepared by: rebeccal
Date: 12/ 9/ 2021
Path: I:\ Projects\ Exhibits\ Fees2022\ Maps\ FeeMaps2022. aprx

Page 5 of 5117 ends

AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
i.
1 _ . i - 9 .- a - I g '•I - ••i : l _,I . _/ -; - I •..3 ./ - 1 -@ '-: . 1 .'$ _1 ..1 - '- 1 - y _ I -1 ._ A _ i n : y Q .] A ._ I _1 _1 _ _ _1 - i )' r I
Exhibit A
r, .

F.

M.

F.

C. 9. BODNOARYJ ACQUIRED BASIN FACILITY 1
r -
DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY 1. 1 PROPOSED BASIN FACILITY S'
BD DRAINAGE AREA DESIGNATION C NON PLANNED AREAS 1 pc

EXISTING PIPELINES J AG USE FEE EXEMPTION I
I
DESIGN PIPELINES CHANNELS AND CANALS L a li! W

PROPOSED PIPELINES
o RURAL STREAMS

IIICITY SPHERE
Ie !. w en,
r».,..

OWN
w
i
e. os. J
71 J
J
rli, 4a:
id, ..
cw
F^
rre
xµ JF
l
Y R

MIMENKER
I ''...,.,
it
A •

3.,_±—
F
N
tT
I f
t.\_. '
LDVI rt
e
i--.. _ ',1::_,
1-' 1
o — '' -
F 1VA
J
u
r: 6-- , a —
N
w
Bo A
Ls iew
A.

I L .
a
All Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District Y.....
w_.__

I STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL MASTER PLAN
FRESNO COUNTY, GALIFORNW.
i r
1 A.. 1.. @.. 1,,. I.. 1.. i. 1:.. 9. {,. i.. 1.. Y.. 7..: £.. 1." L. i.. L. I.. 1..a. L. l.. L. L. 1.. l.. i.. I. 1.. 1.. Y.. I.. 8.. 1.. i. .. I.. 1.. 1.19.. 1.. 1.. 1.. 118
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Surcharge Fee Summary Sheet
Drainage Areas " BX", " DN", " DO", and " 7D"/" 7H"
BX" ( RT Park) 2022 Surcharge Rates

ZONING ACREAGE TOTAL
C- P, C- M, R- P 102. 7 14, 310
DN" ( Copper River Ranch) 2022 Surcharge Rates

ZONING ACREAGE TOTAL
R1- 40% 118. 2 11, 270
R1- 45% 59. 1 11, 640
R1- 50% 59. 1 11, 940
R- 2 46. 6 11, 940
C- 1 9. 3 17, 700
DO" ( Southeast Urban Area) 2022 Surcharge Rates

ZONING ACREAGE TOTAL
OS 32. 9
R1- 50% 176. 9 4, 350
R- 2, M- H 25. 0 4, 350
R- 3, R- 4 97. 8 4, 660
C- P, C- M, R- P 11. 9 6, 110
C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, C- 4, C- 5, C- 6, C- L, P 115. 1 6, 440 DO" ( Loma Vista Community Center South) 2022 Surcharge Rates

ZONING ACREAGE TOTAL
R- 3, R- 4 20. 2 4, 140
C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, C- 4, C- 5, C- 6, C- L, P 47. 1 5, 720 7D"/" 7H" ( RT Park) 2022 Surcharge Rates

ZONING ACREAGE TOTAL
C- P, C- M, R- P 134. 9 5, 555
Exhibit No. 3

Page 1 of 2 ends

119
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
pr
D1(4
M
a
J
I
DEA IF
COPPER
CLOVIS4
p
BZ _
DL
BY1 INTERNATIONAL
dRSL•
qQ
BY
HYMER
DK
FRESNO
DI
e SHEPHERD
rl
d CW BT TEAGUE
i
j _ NEES
F DF` a DGI -
DH *
All 7D
rd m-il*

EK /
SrLLUVIAL
CO2 1Wegiiier WI

11.,
AC

HERNDON
qDKill
Iroleir5i3„
50644
4 pQ
111
SIERRAoA Iri/ /'!'
apr

BOLLARD
Ip 1/'
lolti
99 I ja

BARSTOW
SHAWA
r
DDi g414
D0
DP

AM GETTYSBURG
EO111111 y
ASHLAN
4 1•' W WW 111IMil
di
BB
DAKOTA
CG
IA
s•
i0
EE uu1
Ir• j/ DS
I

SHIELDS
UU2-
ra
AN
4`
1 CLINTON
i. McKINLEY
a'
liffCK
AO
I/
RR k'
f- — _==
OLIVE
iT ^\
a ,
y'
a a BO$ BELMONT
MINI Inb>l<

DV KINGSCANYON
illij
elOPPI‘° PM.

MI 1 tom00 1krellit
BUTLER
ill
r 1511 •BH CALIFORNIA
M i j, o BD BGmBL
CHURCH
ss

1.. Ern99. CCU,

ANNADALE

11.. 1. 1111. 61.

CQ
arkamzi - AZSal
NORTH
MENEM.. di Bv MUSCAT
di nd

F CENTRAL
0z 1 iFia6
CF i
I
MALAGA
Y
AMERICANcc
I W
0 Q
IllZ Z ZH
J
Q
W W - COH Z d' d J O JLU I- Z N W J U) al7 d'
L
W ZH = w } WCCH W z Q 0_
li Q W- Y Z W ) 2 H H Z F 2 H Z Q J v) OJ U Z >
Z J LL Q Z 2 0
Q K d' Q O O J d' Q Q i W CE Q Q - 2 Q 0 W Q 2 J W Z OJ O W O W W U 0 U' U' 00 S 0_ 0 00 00 > S LL W 0 W O 0 0 0_ 0 0 LL Q H J 0 J 2 H

VFRESNO

METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
Exhibit No. 3
Existing Basin M Affected Surcharge Areas ( BX, DO, DN, 7D) Proposed Basin Drainage Areas
City Sphere Lines I% 1 Exempt
Prepared by: rebeccal
Date: 12/ 3/ 2021

Page 2 of 2 ends

120
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 979

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE

FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

RESOLUTION AMENDING THE STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD

CONTROL MASTER PLAN AND AMENDING THE SCHEDULE

OF DRAINAGE FEES, SURCHARGES AND COSTS ESTABLISHING SUCH

COSTS AND FEES FOR LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS
2022- 2023)
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors enacted Resolution No. 1412 on February 9, 1988, establishing a schedule of drainage system costs and fees pursuant to the adopted Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan, said schedule being an element of the drainage fee ordinances of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, Cities of Clovis and Fresno, and the County of Fresno, which ordinances are incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors enacted resolutions from time to time, amending said schedule, the last District- wide amendment being Resolution No. 2020- 958 adopted on December 9, 2020; and
WHEREAS, an amended Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map, attached as Exhibit " A" hereto, specifying public facilities and improvements, existing and proposed, which are necessary to provide drainage service and flood control within the respective local drainage areas specified therein, has been presented to the Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, the District' s Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan includes a study of the impacts of contemplated future development on the District' s existing storm drainage services and facilities in the local drainage areas of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood board\reso\perm\2021- 979
121
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 979

Page 2 of 7 ends

Control District listed in Exhibit " B" attached hereto, along with an analysis of new, improved or expanded public facilities and improvements required or appropriate to serve development in said local drainage areas; and
WHEREAS, as to each of said local drainage areas, said Map, said Plan and said study set forth the relationship between development and said services or facilities; the estimated cost thereof; and the schedule of per gross acre fees calculated to raise the sum of money necessary to pay the estimated total cost of local drainage facilities therein; and WHEREAS, said Map and said study were available at the District' s office for public inspection and review ten ( 10) days prior to this public hearing, and notice was given in compliance with the requirements therefor; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held pursuant to the public notice cited herein at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors finds as follows:

A. That the purpose of said fees is to finance facilities within the District required for the removal of surface and storm waters attributable to development; to obviate the menace to the public health, safety and welfare arising from inadequate provision for removal of surface and storm waters occurring as the result of development of property; to prevent deterioration of property values and impairment of conditions making for desirable residential, commercial or industrial development, as the case may be, which would result board\reso\perm\2021- 979
122
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 979

Page 3 of 7 ends

from the failure to construct planned local drainage facilities relative to development of property; and to prevent deterioration of public streets and other public facilities which would result from failure to construct planned local drainage facilities concurrently with development.

B. The fees adopted and collected pursuant to the drainage fee ordinances and this Resolution are to be used to finance only the public facilities shown on Exhibit " A", within each of the respective local drainage areas identified in Exhibit" B" hereto.

C. After considering said Map and said study and the analysis prepared by the District; the respective General Plans and community and specific plans prepared by the Development Departments of said County and Cities; and the information and testimony received at this public hearing, the Board of Directors approves said Map and said study, and incorporates such herein. The Board further finds that all new development in the subject area will generate the need for storm drainage facilities therein, and generates an unmet need for storm drainage facilities and services in said area.

D. There is a need in local drainage areas for storm drainage facilities whichhave not been constructed or have been constructed; said facilities have been called for in, or are consistent with, the General Plans. Development will contribute its fair share toward the facility costs in those local drainage areas listed in Exhibit " B" through payment of the respective drainage fees set forth therein.
board\reso\perm\2021- 979
123
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 979

Page 4 of 7 ends

E. The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities and the impacts of the types of development as described in Exhibits " A" and ` B" for which the corresponding fee set forth in Exhibit` B" is charged. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of said fee and development of the lands in the service area for which the fee is charged, as these reasonable relationships or nexusesare described in more detail in the study and Map referred to above.

F. The Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map attached hereto as Exhibit " A" and the storm drainage fee rate schedule set forth in Exhibit ` B", as adopted by Paragraphs 2 and 3 herein, revise the District' s Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan, to conform to its General Plan and comply with Section 66483 of the California Government Code.

G. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit ` B" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the fee schedule set forth therein is based on said estimates and is to generate fees from development which will not exceed the total of these costs.

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Board of Directors of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District that:

1. The above recitals are true and correct, and this Board so finds and determines.

2. This Resolution is exempt from further California Environmental Quality Act CEQA) assessmentper the provisions of Public ResourcesCode Section 21080(b)( 8)(D). board\reso\perm\2021- 979
124
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 979

Page 5 of 7 ends

3. The Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan is hereby amended to include that Storm Drain and Flood Control Master Plan Map attached hereto as Exhibit " A" and as supported by Exhibit` B".

4. The schedule of drainage fees for those respective local drainage areas listed in Exhibit` B" hereto is hereby adopted asset forth in said Exhibit` B". The District shall prepare a 2022- 2023 schedule of drainage fees for each of its local drainage areas, which shall include the amendments adopted herein. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66017, said schedule of drainage fees shall become effective no sooner than sixty( 60) days from the date of adoption of this Resolution. In compliance with California Government Code Section 66017, the District' s 2022- 2023 schedule of drainage fees shall be effective as of March 1, 2022, in accordance with the drainage fee ordinances. Fees shall be paid in accordance with the drainage fee ordinances and as specified in said 2022- 2023 drainage fee schedule.

5. The fee shall be used solely to pay: ( a) costs related to the design, administration and construction of the described public storm water facilities; ( b) for reimbursing the District for the development' s fair share of those costs incurred by the District in the design and construction of the described public storm water facilities; or ( c) to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities in each service area where those facilities were beyond that needed to mitigate the impacts of the other developers' project or projects and where reimbursement is provided for in the applicable Drainage Fee Ordinance.
board\reso\perm\2021- 979
125
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 979

Page 6 of 7 ends

6. The District, pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance, shall analyze and review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements for which this fee is charged, the continued or expanded need therefor, and the reasonable relationship between such facility needs and the varying types of development. The General Manager- Secretary shall report the findings to the Board of Directors and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed.

7. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66022, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Resolution shall be brought within one hundred twenty ( 120) days of the adoption of this Resolution. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66022, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the fee increase shall commence within one hundred twenty 120) days of the effective date of the increase, which is identified in Paragraph No. 4 hereinabove. Administrative appeal is a mandatory prerequisite to any such judicial action or proceeding. Such appeal shall be made in writing to the Director of Development of Public Works of the political subdivision in which the property subjected hereto is located( i.e., the City of Fresno, the City of Clovis or the County of Fresno). Such appeal must be made within sixty ( 60) days after the effective date hereof. The Director shall set the matter for hearing, conduct the hearing and render a decision within forty ( 40) days after such appeal is filed.

8. The Ordinances of the City of Fresno, City of Clovis, and the County of Fresno have an administrative mechanism whereby a property owner who seeks to develop property within the boundaries of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District can challenge the board\reso\perm\2021- 979
126
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 979

Page 7 of 7 ends

fees imposed thereunder only by first paying said fees under protest. Developers of property within the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District shall adhere to the applicable ordinance of the City of Fresno, City of Clovis or the County of Fresno under which it is required that drainage fees must be paid before development is allowed, and that such fee may be paid underprotest.

PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the District, this 15thday of December 2021 by the following vote:

AYES: Directors Garcia, Burleson, Fowler, Rastegar, Spina, and Busani NOES: None
ABSENT: Director Auston
ABSTAIN: None
board\reso\perm\2021- 979
127
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
i _ 1 .. a -I g '•1 - •i . 1 .1 _. _ _; _ . 3 . I _ I ' . 1% 1 ..I - '- 1 1- -i .- I _ I - i n : y it, . ._ I_ 1 _1 _1 _ _1 1 r I
Exhibit A
r, .

F. M. F. C. 9. BOUNDARY ACQUIRED BASIN FACILITY 1
r -
DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY 1. 1 PROPOSEDBASIN FACILITY S'
BD DRAINAGE AREA DESIGNATION C NONPLANNEDAREAS 1 pc
EXISTING PIPELINES J AG USE FEE EXEMPTION 1
I
DESIGN PIPELINES CHANNELS AND CANALS L a li!
PROPOSED PIPELINES o RURAL STREAMS

III - -
W

CITY SPHERE
Ie !. A. enr
r»....

MAYA
n OP.
s r15
1 o. w
II I
O.

CH
5/1MliegitT
i
en we
r'}
ii- Jrr A._
e
I '..
1:
1-rd ,.

I '...,
it
A •
ii___ .

F' m---
t.\_. '
F
N
tT I 4-1 „„ f LDVI t
I-
µ
e
i-.. -:1:..._,
1-' 1o -
J.

F 1wi,
J
1r... 4
IN
4 nJ
W„
Im 1
L .
00 ap A
Ls iew
i i__ ,
sir=
VI
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District Y
w_.__

STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL MASTER PLAN
FRESNO COUNTY, GALIFORNis
i r

4.. 1.,. i.. t.. a.. 1,,. I.. 1.. i. 1:.. 1.. 1,. 1.. 1. . , _ 1.. , " I.. i.. I.. I.. 1.. .. !.. I.. 1,. .. 1.. 1.. 1.. I. 1.. L.. Y... L.. I.. $.. .. 1.. i» 1.. r $.. I.. 1.. I.. 128
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2022 Drainage Fee Schedule with Amendments ( County Schedule) County scheduleincludes both City of Fresno and Clovis schedules Exhibit B
board\reso\perm\ 2021-
129
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
rar
1 2022 DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE
Fresno County
Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 1 of 14130
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
L, ar L IL
Fresno
Metropolitan 7
Flood Control District
f
6!
NM N
MT
A
T 2
AR
6R
IL
CI
Ac) ER:
ail
T
lirLegend r' :

IuF 4
f. ex
K
cal
cux
CM
1111111" as::...i.Drainage Zoom
a
I ZoneL CI
QPt
liDQZone111Ikg1111p10ifirlia .

1...8.1 i.i.
2 ew
rnr. bwUnry
Mlle 3
Fi . no
ar
410
E$51155 r•
J
f're5156Sphere of Influence
pa , Alir
4 Aw -
R.. no Sphere of Influence Co I' Ell
1/. 1$
1•
111
VIIF"dalifClovis Sphere of Influence
AR ___\.
k
A
Ill
Ilt
esew*
At*
AN xx WI
L
u
Iff
I
u+ i
CR
AV
UUS " y' aR
I- — . Y '-
IOW_ ! R
IIMIMPIPII W‘IiiI
fr'
Brlho ,
V
i II3
Z
4 - G0f1'
AR
111.116.1. •
9 R
AS
K a f
EN
1nF
R
the M1mao M dropnlren rimd metre,
R rGprcprcamdrocad5h- nfenn3or.

TT 21110- "RI
S.
for Ea von prrpoca and Vic uSormdon
may nil be arrabk fa rtherpurpr< a_ r
ihia oformaam la prordcd as IL Purd5c 15u
domrrcrtmon of dtira& ra oar be
Iobrood by mnrecEnw rrmm III k
MaropoYfaln flmd mrtrol a> ae
Mauer planed Mma¢ rrenL.

CS
99®!_ OYx 7lx Frcavr LP, 03727
Tel: 0591450- 1793_
ap.T..11LIO.

V.

C7
E.

ICECr
41 L. 2= 3.. L111 b 43131
P¢[
h
aft tlK
3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 2 of 14131
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE- 5, A- L, 0 Al, A2, RR R- 1- E, R- 1- EH, R- 1- A, R- 1- AH R- 1- B, R- 1- C, R- 1 40% R- 1 45% R- 1 50% R- 2, M- H R- 3 R- 4, T- P M- 1, M- 2, M- 3, C- P, C- M, R- P C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, Total Cost R- A RE C- R, M- 1- P, S- L C- 4, C- 5, C- 6,
Area C- L, P
R BASIN $ 1, 430 1, 630 2, 050 2, 450 2, 870 3, 070 3, 220 3, 380 3, 380 3, 780 4, 600 6, 690 7, 170 7, 680 3, 037, 290 PIPE 1, 840 2, 080 2, 770 3, 010 3, 260 3, 390 3, 500 3, 600 3, 600 3, 850 4, 110 4, 780 5, 050 5, 330 2, 830, 980 TOTAL $ 3, 270 3, 710 4, 820 5, 460 6, 130 6, 460 6, 720 6, 980 6, 980 7, 630 8, 710 11, 970 12, 220 13, 010 $ 5,868, 270 AB BASIN $ 1, 060 1, 210 1, 520 1, 820 2, 120 2, 270 2, 390 2, 510 2, 510 2, 800 3, 410 4, 960 5, 310 5, 690 1, 824, 370 PIPE 1, 000 1, 130 1, 500 1, 630 1, 770 1, 840 1, 900 1, 950 1, 950 2, 090 2, 230 2, 590 2, 740 2, 890 1, 420, 070 TOTAL $ 2, 060 2, 340 3, 020 3, 450 3, 890 4, 110 4, 290 4, 460 4, 460 4, 890 5, 640 7, 550 8, 050 8, 580 3, 244, 440 AC BASIN $ 640 730 920 1, 100 1, 280 1, 370 1, 440 1, 520 1, 520 1, 700 2, 060 3, 000 3, 210 3, 440 1, 095, 117 PIPE 890 1, 010 1, 340 1, 460 1, 580 1, 650 1, 700 1, 740 1, 740 1, 870 1, 990 2, 320 2, 450 2, 580 1, 164, 819 TOTAL $ 1, 530 1, 740 2, 260 2, 560 2, 860 3, 020 3, 140 3, 260 3, 260 3, 570 4, 050 5, 320 5, 660 6, 020 2, 259, 936 AD BASIN $ 1, 480 1, 690 2, 120 2, 530 2, 960 3, 170 3, 330 3, 490 3, 490 3, 910 4, 750 6, 910 7, 400 7, 930 1, 204, 600 PIPE 480 540 720 780 840 880 910 930 930 1, 000 1, 060 1, 230 1, 310 1, 380 330, 500 TOTAL $ 1, 960 2, 230 2,840 3, 310 3, 800 4, 050 4, 240 9, 420 4, 420 4, 910 5,810 8, 140 8, 710 9, 310 1, 535, 100 AE BASIN $ 1, 940 2, 220 2, 780 3, 320 3, 890 4, 160 4, 370 4, 590 4, 590 5, 130 6, 240 9, 070 9, 720 10, 420 $ 2, 734, 680 PIPE 630 710 950 1, 030 1, 120 1, 160 1, 200 1, 230 1, 230 1, 320 1, 410 1, 640 1, 730 1, 830 716, 550 TOTAL $ 2, 570 2, 930 3, 730 4, 350 5, 010 5, 320 5, 570 5, 820 5,820 6, 450 7,650 10, 710 11, 450 12, 250 $ 3,451, 230 AF BASIN $ 900 1, 030 1, 290 1, 540 1, 800 1, 930 2, 020 2, 120 2, 120 2, 370 2, 890 4, 200 4, 500 4, 820 1, 512, 650 PIPE 500 570 760 820 890 930 960 980 980 1, 050 1, 120 1, 300 1, 380 1, 460 510, 250 TOTAL $ 1, 400 1, 600 2, 050 2, 360 2,690 2, 860 2, 980 3, 100 3, 100 3, 420 4, 010 5, 500 5,880 6, 280 2,022, 900 AG BASIN $ 520 590 740 880 1, 030 1, 110 1, 160 1, 220 1, 220 1, 360 1, 660 2, 410 2, 580 2, 770 1, 431, 120 PIPE 1, 710 1, 930 2, 570 2, 790 3, 030 3, 150 3, 250 3, 340 3, 340 3, 580 3, 820 4, 430 4, 690 9, 950 2, 888, 080 TOTAL $ 2, 230 2, 520 3, 310 3, 670 4, 060 4, 260 4, 410 4, 560 4, 560 4, 940 5, 480 6, 840 7, 270 7, 720 4, 319, 200 AH BASIN $ 1, 490 1, 700 2, 130 2, 540 2, 980 3, 180 3, 350 3, 510 3, 510 3, 930 4, 780 6, 950 7, 440 7, 970 4, 696, 880 PIPE 2, 330 2, 630 3, 490 3, 800 4, 120 4, 290 4, 430 4, 540 4, 540 4, 870 5, 190 6, 030 6, 380 6, 730 4, 237, 520 TOTAL $ 3, 820 4, 330 5, 620 6, 340 7, 100 7, 470 7, 780 8, 050 8, 050 8, 800 9, 970 12, 980 13, 820 14, 700 $ 8, 934, 400 Al BASIN $ 1, 660 1, 890 2, 370 2, 830 3, 310 3, 550 3, 730 3, 910 3, 910 4, 370 5, 320 7, 740 8, 280 8, 880 2, 730, 960 PIPE 3, 610 4, 070 5, 410 5, 880 6, 380 6, 630 6, 850 7, 030 7, 030 7, 540 8, 040 9, 340 9, 880 10, 420 $ 3, 897, 710 TOTAL $ 5,270 5, 960 7, 780 8, 710 9, 690 10, 180 10, 580 10, 940 10, 990 11, 910 13, 360 17, 080 18, 160 19, 300 $ 6, 628, 670 A3 BASIN $ 1, 930 2, 200 2, 750 3, 290 3, 850 4, 120 4, 330 4, 550 4, 550 5, 080 6, 180 8, 990 9, 630 10, 320 $ 1, 741, 860 PIPE 590 670 890 970 1, 050 1, 090 1, 130 1, 160 1, 160 1, 240 1, 320 1, 540 1, 620 1, 710 435, 470 TOTAL $ 2, 520 2, 870 3, 640 4, 260 4, 900 5, 210 5, 460 5, 710 5, 710 6, 320 7, 500 10, 530 11, 250 12, 030 $ 2, 177, 330 AK BASIN $ 1, 170 1, 330 1, 670 2, 000 2, 340 2, 500 2, 630 2, 760 2, 760 3, 090 3, 750 5, 460 5, 840 6, 260 3, 554, 090 PIPE 2, 100 2, 380 3, 150 3, 430 3, 720 3, 870 3, 990 4, 100 4, 100 4, 390 4, 690 5, 440 5, 760 6, 080 4, 768, 210 TOTAL $ 3, 270 3, 710 4, 820 5, 430 6, 060 6, 370 6, 620 6, 860 6, 860 7, 480 8, 940 10, 900 11, 600 12, 340 $ 8, 322, 300 AL BASIN $ 1, 150 1, 310 1, 640 1, 960 2, 300 2, 460 2, 580 2, 710 2, 710 3, 030 3, 690 5, 360 5, 740 6, 150 2, 803, 410 PIPE 2, 490 2, 810 3, 730 4, 050 4, 400 4, 580 4, 720 4, 850 4, 850 5, 200 5, 540 6, 440 6, 810 7, 190 4, 650, 720 TOTAL $ 3, 640 4, 120 5, 370 6, 010 6, 700 7, 040 7, 300 7, 560 7, 560 8, 230 9, 230 11, 800 12, 550 13, 340 $ 7, 454, 130 AM BASIN $ 2, 370 2, 370 2, 970 3, 550 4, 150 4, 450 4, 670 4, 900 4, 900 5, 480 6, 670 9, 700 10, 390 11, 130 $ 1, 260, 966 PIPE 5, 950 5, 950 7, 900 8, 590 9, 330 9, 700 10, 010 10, 280 10, 280 11, 010 11, 750 13, 650 14, 440 15, 230 $ 2, 886, 860 TOTAL $ 8, 320 8, 320 10, 870 12, 140 13, 480 14, 150 19, 680 15, 180 15, 180 16, 990 18, 420 23, 350 29, 830 26, 360 $ 4, 147, 826 3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 3 of 14132
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE- 5, A- L, 0 Al, A2, RR R- 1- E, R- 1- EH, R- 1- A, R- 1- AH R- 1- B, R- 1- C, R- 1 40% R- 1 45% R- 1 50% R- 2, M- H R- 3 R- 4, T- P M- 1, M- 2, M- 3, C- P, C- M, R- P C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, Total Cost R- A RE C- R, M- 1- P, 5- L C- 4, C- 5, C- 6,
Area C- L, P
AN BASIN $ 1,860 2, 120 2,660 3, 190 3, 730 3, 990 4, 190 4, 400 4, 400 4, 920 5,980 8, 700 9, 320 9, 990 2,631, 910 PIPE 1, 950 2, 200 2, 920 3, 170 3, 440 3, 580 3, 700 3, 790 3, 790 4, 070 4, 340 5, 040 5, 330 5, 620 2, 318, 090 TOTAL $ 3, 810 4, 320 5, 580 6, 360 7, 170 7, 570 7, 890 8, 190 8, 190 8, 990 10, 320 13, 740 14, 650 15, 610 $ 4, 950, 000 AO BASIN $ 1, 790 2, 040 2, 560 3, 060 3, 580 3, 830 4, 030 4, 220 4, 220 4, 720 5, 740 8, 360 8, 950 9, 590 3, 220, 500 PIPE 5,340 6, 040 8, 010 8, 710 9, 460 9, 830 10, 150 10, 420 10, 420 11, 170 11, 910 13, 840 14, 640 15, 440 $ 7, 201, 430 TOTAL $ 7, 130 8, 080 10, 570 11, 770 13, 040 13, 660 14, 180 14, 640 14, 640 15, 890 17, 650 22, 200 23, 590 25, 030 $ 10, 421, 930 AQ
BASIN $ 1, 790 2, 040 2, 560 3, 060 3, 580 3, 830 4, 030 4, 230 4, 230 4, 730 5, 750 8, 360 8, 950 9, 600 3, 855, 130 PIPE 4, 880 5, 510 7,320 7, 950 8, 630 8, 980 9, 270 9, 510 9, 510 10, 200 10, 880 12, 630 13, 370 14, 100 $ 6, 891, 230 TOTAL $ 6, 670 7, 550 9, 880 11, 010 12, 210 12, 810 13, 300 13, 740 13, 740 14, 930 16, 630 20, 990 22, 320 23, 700 $ 10, 746, 360 AR BASIN $ 1,980 2, 260 2,830 3, 390 3, 960 4, 240 4, 460 4, 680 4, 680 5, 230 6, 360 9, 250 9, 910 10, 620 $ 4, 075, 270 PIPE 6, 650 7, 520 9, 980 10, 850 11, 780 12, 240 12, 640 12, 970 12, 970 13, 910 14, 840 17, 230 18, 230 19, 230 $ 8,468, 130 TOTAL $ 8, 630 9, 780 12, 810 14, 240 15, 740 16, 480 17, 100 17, 650 17, 650 19, 140 21, 200 26, 480 28, 140 29, 850 $ 12, 543, 400 AS BASIN $ 1,520 1, 730 2, 180 2, 600 3, 040 3, 260 3, 420 3, 590 3, 590 4, 020 4, 880 7, 110 7,610 8, 160 4, 816, 410 PIPE 5, 510 6, 230 8, 270 8, 980 9, 760 10, 140 10, 470 10, 750 10, 750 11, 520 12, 290 14, 280 15, 100 15, 930 $ 12, 281, 120 TOTAL $ 7, 030 7, 960 10, 450 11, 580 12, 800 13, 400 13, 890 14, 340 14, 340 15, 540 17, 170 21, 390 22, 710 24, 090 $ 17, 097, 530 AU BASIN $ 4, 090 4, 660 5,850 6, 990 8, 180 8, 750 9, 200 9, 650 9, 650 10, 790 13, 120 19, 090 20, 440 21, 920 $ 3, 538, 510 PIPE 4, 760 5, 370 7, 130 7, 750 8, 420 8, 750 9, 040 9, 270 9, 270 9, 940 10, 610 12, 320 13, 030 13, 740 $ 3, 368, 730 TOTAL $ 8, 850 10, 030 12, 980 14, 740 16, 600 17, 500 18, 240 18, 920 18, 920 20, 730 23, 730 31, 410 33, 470 35, 660 $ 6, 907, 240 AV BASIN $ 1, 630 1, 860 2, 330 2, 790 3, 260 3, 490 3, 670 3, 850 3, 850 4, 300 5, 230 7, 610 8, 150 8, 730 5, 506, 580 PIPE 7,690 8, 680 11, 530 12, 530 13, 600 14, 140 14, 600 14, 990 14, 990 16, 060 17, 140 19, 900 21, 060 22, 210 $ 14, 708, 180 TOTAL $ 9, 320 10, 540 13, 860 15, 320 16, 860 17, 630 18, 270 18, 840 18, 840 20, 360 22, 370 27, 510 29, 210 30, 940 $ 20, 214, 760 AWl BASIN $ 1, 330 1, 510 1, 900 2, 270 2, 650 2, 840 2, 980 3, 130 3, 130 3, 500 4, 260 6, 190 6, 630 7, 110 1, 952, 330 PIPE 7,640 8, 630 11, 460 12, 450 13, 520 14, 050 14, 510 14, 890 14, 890 15, 960 17, 030 19, 780 20, 930 22, 070 $ 6, 234, 790 TOTAL $ 8, 970 10, 140 13, 360 14, 720 16, 170 16, 890 17, 490 18, 020 18, 020 19, 460 21, 290 25, 970 27, 560 29, 180 $ 8, 187, 120 AW2 BASIN $ 990 1, 130 1,420 1, 700 1,990 2, 130 2,240 2, 350 2,350 2, 620 3, 190 4, 640 4, 970 5, 330 1,539, 010 PIPE 990 1, 120 1, 490 1, 620 1, 760 1,830 1,890 1, 940 1,940 2, 080 2, 220 2, 580 2, 730 2, 870 854, 280 TOTAL $ 1, 980 2, 250 2, 910 3, 320 3, 750 3, 960 4, 130 4, 290 4, 290 4, 700 5, 410 7, 220 7, 700 8, 200 2, 393, 290 AX BASIN $ 1,290 1, 470 1,850 2, 210 2,590 2, 770 2,910 3, 050 3, 050 3, 420 4, 150 6, 040 6, 470 6, 930 2,047, 230 PIPE 2, 220 2, 510 3, 330 3, 620 3, 930 4, 080 4, 220 4, 330 4, 330 4, 640 4, 950 5, 750 6, 080 6, 410 1, 947, 650 TOTAL $ 3, 510 3, 980 5, 180 5, 830 6, 520 6, 850 7, 130 7, 380 7, 380 8, 060 9, 100 11, 790 12, 550 13, 340 $ 3, 994, 880 AY BASIN $ 1,890 2, 150 2,700 3, 230 3, 780 4, 040 4, 250 4, 460 4, 460 4, 990 6, 060 8, 820 9, 440 10, 120 $ 3,443, 240 PIPE 3, 290 3, 720 4, 940 5, 360 5, 830 6, 060 6, 250 6, 420 6, 420 6, 880 7, 340 8, 520 9, 020 9, 510 3, 327, 410 TOTAL $ 5, 180 5, 870 7, 640 8, 590 9, 610 10, 100 10, 500 10, 880 10, 880 11, 870 13, 400 17, 340 18, 460 19, 630 $ 6, 770, 650 AZ BASIN $ 560 640 810 960 1, 130 1, 210 1, 270 1, 330 1, 330 1, 490 1, 810 2, 630 2, 820 3, 020 1, 517, 460 PIPE 2,390 2, 700 3, 580 3, 890 4, 220 4, 390 4, 530 4, 650 4, 650 4, 990 5,320 6, 180 6, 540 6, 890 3, 736, 100 TOTAL $ 2, 950 3, 340 4, 390 4, 850 5, 350 5, 600 5, 800 5, 980 5, 980 6, 480 7, 130 8, 810 9, 360 9, 910 5, 253, 560 BC BASIN $ 1, 820 2, 080 2, 610 3, 120 3, 640 3, 900 4, 100 4, 300 4, 300 4, 810 5, 850 8, 510 9, 110 9, 770 5, 005, 980 PIPE 3, 030 3, 430 4, 550 4, 940 5,370 5, 580 5,760 5, 910 5,910 6, 340 6, 760 7, 850 8, 310 8, 760 6, 117, 560 TOTAL $ 4, 850 5, 510 7, 160 8, 060 9, 010 9, 480 9, 860 10, 210 10, 210 11, 150 12, 610 16, 360 17, 420 18, 530 $ 11, 123, 540 3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 4 of 14133
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE- 5, A- L, 0 Al, A2, RR R- 1- E, R- 1- EH, R- 1- A, R- 1- AH R- 1- B, R- 1- C, R- 1 40% R- 1 45% R- 1 50% R- 2, M- H R- 3 R- 4, T- P M- 1, M- 2, M- 3, C- P, C- M, R- P C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, Total Cost R- A RE C- R, M- 1- P, S- L C- 4, C- 5, C- 6,
Area C- L, P
BD BASIN $ 1,510 1, 720 2, 160 2, 580 3, 020 3, 230 3, 390 3, 560 3,560 3, 980 4, 840 7, 050 7, 540 8, 090 2,512, 240 PIPE 3, 190 3, 610 4, 790 5, 210 5, 650 5, 880 6, 070 6, 230 6, 230 6, 670 7, 120 8, 270 8, 750 9, 230 3, 556, 080 TOTAL $ 4, 700 5, 330 6, 950 7, 790 8, 670 9, 110 9, 460 9, 790 9, 790 10, 650 11, 960 15, 320 16, 290 17, 320 $ 6, 068, 320 BE BASIN $ 1, 530 1, 740 2, 180 2, 610 3, 050 3, 260 3, 430 3, 600 3, 600 4, 030 4, 900 7, 120 7, 630 8, 180 1, 397, 560 PIPE 2,680 3, 020 4, 010 4, 360 4, 740 4, 920 5,080 5, 220 5,220 5, 590 5,970 6, 930 7,330 7, 730 2, 100, 940 TOTAL $ 4, 210 4, 760 6, 190 6, 970 7, 790 8, 180 8, 510 8, 820 8, 820 9, 620 10, 870 14, 050 14, 960 15, 910 $ 3, 498, 500 BF BASIN $ 2, 080 2, 380 2, 980 3, 570 4, 170 4, 460 4, 690 4, 920 4, 920 5, 500 6, 690 9, 740 10, 420 11, 180 $ 1, 797, 290 PIPE 1,390 1, 570 2,080 2, 260 2, 460 2, 550 2,640 2, 710 2, 710 2, 900 3, 090 3, 590 3, 800 4, 010 973, 050 TOTAL $ 3, 470 3, 950 5, 060 5, 830 6, 630 7, 010 7, 330 7, 630 7, 630 8, 400 9, 780 13, 330 14, 220 15, 190 $ 2, 770, 340 BG BASIN $ 1,730 1, 980 2,460 2, 970 3, 470 3, 710 3, 900 4, 090 4, 090 4, 580 5,570 8, 100 8, 670 9, 300 4, 050, 010 PIPE 3, 610 4, 080 5, 420 5, 890 6, 390 6, 640 6, 860 7, 040 7, 040 7, 550 8, 050 9, 350 9, 890 10, 430 $ 5,639, 280 TOTAL $ 5, 340 6, 060 7, 900 8, 860 9, 860 10, 350 10, 760 11, 130 11, 130 12, 130 13, 620 17, 450 18, 560 19, 730 $ 9, 689, 290 BH BASIN $ 1,010 1, 150 1,440 1, 730 2,020 2, 160 2,270 2, 380 2,380 2, 670 3, 240 4, 720 5,050 5, 420 2,026, 790 PIPE 4, 360 4, 930 6, 550 7, 110 7, 720 8, 030 8, 290 8, 510 8, 510 9, 120 9, 730 11, 300 11, 960 12, 610 $ 7, 690, 260 TOTAL $ 5, 370 6, 080 7, 990 8, 840 9, 740 10, 190 10, 560 10, 890 10, 890 11, 790 12, 970 16, 020 17, 010 18, 030 $ 9, 717, 050 B) BASIN $ 990 1, 120 1,410 1, 680 1,970 2, 110 2,220 2, 330 2,330 2, 600 3, 160 4, 600 4, 930 5, 280 1,225, 630 PIPE 3, 450 3, 900 5, 180 5, 630 6, 110 6, 350 6, 560 6, 730 6, 730 7, 220 7, 700 8, 940 9, 460 9, 980 2, 376, 340 TOTAL $ 4, 440 5, 020 6, 590 7, 310 8, 080 8, 460 8, 780 9, 060 9, 060 9, 820 10, 860 13, 540 14, 390 15, 260 $ 3, 601, 970 BK BASIN $ 2, 370 2, 710 3, 390 4, 060 4, 750 5, 080 5, 340 5, 600 5, 600 6, 270 7, 620 11, 080 11, 870 12, 720 $ 2, 407, 350 PIPE 2,930 3, 310 4, 400 4, 780 5, 190 5, 390 5,570 5, 710 5,710 6, 120 6, 530 7, 590 8, 030 8, 470 1,893, 940 TOTAL $ 5, 300 6, 020 7, 790 8, 840 9, 940 10, 470 10, 910 11, 310 11, 310 12, 390 14, 150 18, 670 19, 900 21, 190 $ 4, 301, 290 BL BASIN $ 1, 690 1, 930 2, 420 2, 890 3, 380 3, 620 3, 810 3, 990 3, 990 4, 460 5, 430 7, 900 8, 460 9, 060 4, 949, 210 PIPE 5,260 5, 940 7,890 8, 570 9, 310 9, 680 9, 990 10, 260 10, 260 10, 990 11, 730 13, 620 14, 410 15, 200 $ 9, 662, 820 TOTAL $ 6, 950 7, 870 10, 310 11, 460 12, 690 13, 300 13, 800 14, 250 14, 250 15, 450 17, 160 21, 520 22, 870 24, 260 $ 14, 612, 030 BM BASIN $ 910 1, 040 1,300 1, 560 1,820 1,950 2,050 2, 150 2, 150 2, 400 2,920 4, 250 4, 550 4, 880 3, 714, 150 PIPE 3, 980 4, 500 5,980 6, 490 7, 050 7, 330 7,570 7, 770 7,770 8, 330 8, 890 10, 320 10, 920 11, 520 $ 12, 016, 230 TOTAL $ 4, 890 5, 540 7, 280 8, 050 8, 870 9, 280 9, 620 9, 920 9, 920 10, 730 11, 810 14, 570 15, 470 16, 400 $ 15, 730, 380 BO BASIN $ 1,620 1, 840 2,310 2, 770 3, 230 3, 460 3, 640 3, 820 3, 820 4, 270 5, 190 7, 550 8, 090 8, 670 1,849, 550 PIPE 1, 970 2, 230 2, 960 3, 220 3, 500 3, 630 3, 750 3, 850 3, 850 4, 130 4, 400 5, 110 5, 410 5, 710 1, 721, 030 TOTAL $ 3, 590 4, 070 5, 270 5, 990 6, 730 7, 090 7, 390 7, 670 7, 670 8, 400 9, 590 12, 660 13, 500 14, 380 $ 3, 570, 580 BP BASIN $ 3, 520 4, 020 5,040 6, 030 7,050 7, 540 7,930 8, 320 8, 320 9, 310 11, 310 16, 460 17, 620 18, 890 $ 2,328, 970 PIPE 4, 570 5, 160 6, 850 7, 440 8, 080 8, 400 8, 680 8, 910 8, 910 9, 540 10, 180 11, 830 12, 510 13, 200 $ 1, 673, 570 TOTAL $ 8, 090 9, 180 11, 890 13, 470 15, 130 15, 940 16, 610 17, 230 17, 230 18, 850 21, 490 28, 290 30, 130 32, 090 $ 4, 002, 540 BQ
BASIN $ 1, 530 1, 750 2, 190 2, 620 3, 070 3, 280 3, 450 3, 620 3, 620 4, 050 4, 920 7, 160 7, 660 8, 210 2, 799, 660 PIPE 3, 780 4, 270 5,660 6, 150 6, 680 6, 950 7, 170 7, 360 7,360 7, 890 8, 420 9, 780 10, 350 10, 910 $ 4, 414, 650 TOTAL $ 5, 310 6, 020 7, 850 8, 770 9, 750 10, 230 10, 620 10, 980 10, 980 11, 940 13, 340 16, 940 18, 010 19, 120 $ 7, 214, 310 BR BASIN $ 2, 330 2, 660 3, 330 3, 990 4, 660 4, 990 5, 250 5, 500 5, 500 6, 160 7, 490 10, 890 11, 660 12, 500 $ 2, 973, 340 PIPE 4, 170 4, 710 6, 260 6, 800 7,380 7, 680 7,930 8, 130 8, 130 8, 720 9, 300 10, 800 11, 430 12, 060 $ 2,949, 740 TOTAL $ 6, 500 7, 370 9, 590 10, 790 12, 040 12, 670 13, 180 13, 630 13, 630 14, 880 16, 790 21, 690 23, 090 24, 560 $ 5, 923, 080 3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 5 of 14134
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE- 5, A- L, 0 Al, A2, RR R- 1- E, R- 1- EH, R- 1- A, R- 1- AH R- 1- B, R- 1- C, R- 1 40% R- 1 45% R- 1 50% R- 2, M- H R- 3 R- 4, T- P M- 1, M- 2, M- 3, C- P, C- M, R- P C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, Total Cost R- A RE C- R, M- 1- P, S- L C- 4, C- 5, C- 6,
Area C- L, P
BS BASIN $ 1,700 1, 930 2,430 2, 900 3, 390 3, 630 3, 820 4, 000 4, 000 4, 480 5,440 7, 920 6,480 9, 090 4, 954, 320 PIPE 5, 200 5, 880 7, 810 8, 480 9, 210 9, 580 9, 890 10, 150 10, 150 10, 880 11, 610 13, 480 14, 260 15, 040 $ 11, 699, 310 TOTAL $ 6, 900 7, 810 10, 240 11, 380 12, 600 13, 210 13, 710 14, 150 14, 150 15, 360 17, 050 21, 400 22, 740 24, 130 $ 16, 653, 630 BT BASIN $ 2, 330 2, 650 3, 330 3, 980 4, 660 4, 980 5, 240 5, 490 5, 490 6, 150 7, 470 10, 870 11, 640 12, 480 $ 4, 836, 130 PIPE 4, 850 5, 490 7, 280 7, 910 8, 590 8, 930 9, 220 9, 470 9, 470 10, 150 10, 830 12, 570 13, 300 14, 030 $ 8, 899, 510 TOTAL $ 7, 180 8, 140 10, 610 11, 890 13, 250 13, 910 14, 460 14, 960 14, 960 16, 300 18, 300 23, 440 24, 940 26, 510 $ 13, 735, 640 BU BASIN $ 550 630 790 940 1, 100 1, 180 1, 240 1, 300 1, 300 1, 450 1, 760 2, 570 2, 750 2, 940 2, 468, 350 PIPE 2,020 2, 280 3, 030 3, 290 3, 580 3, 720 3, 840 3, 940 3, 940 4, 220 4, 500 5, 230 5,530 5, 840 5,320, 610 TOTAL $ 2, 570 2, 910 3, 820 4, 230 4, 680 4, 900 5, 080 5, 240 5, 240 5, 670 6, 260 7, 800 8, 280 8, 780 7, 788, 960 By BASIN $ 1,000 1, 140 1,430 1, 720 2,010 2, 150 2,260 2, 370 2,370 2, 650 3, 220 4, 680 5,020 5, 380 1,442, 990 PIPE 2, 280 2, 570 3, 420 3, 710 4, 030 4, 190 4, 330 4, 440 4, 440 4, 760 5,080 5, 900 6, 240 6, 580 2,691, 610 TOTAL $ 3, 280 3, 710 4, 850 5, 430 6, 040 6, 340 6, 590 6, 810 6, 810 7, 410 8, 300 10, 580 11, 260 11, 960 $ 4, 134, 600 BW BASIN $ 970 1, 110 1,390 1, 660 1,940 2, 080 2, 190 2, 300 2,300 2, 570 3, 120 4, 540 4, 860 5, 210 1,211, 930 PIPE 1, 090 1, 240 1, 640 1, 780 1, 940 2, 010 2, 080 2, 130 2, 130 2, 290 2, 440 2, 830 3, 000 3, 160 1, 082, 900 TOTAL $ 2, 060 2, 350 3, 030 3, 440 3, 880 4, 090 4, 270 4, 430 4, 430 4, 860 5, 560 7, 370 7, 860 8, 370 2, 294, 830 BX BASIN $ 1,550 1, 760 2,210 2, 650 3, 100 3, 310 3, 480 3, 650 3, 650 4, 090 4, 970 7, 230 7,740 8, 300 6, 284, 770 PIPE 2, 960 3, 340 4, 430 4, 820 5, 230 5, 440 5, 620 5, 770 5, 770 6, 180 6, 590 7, 660 8, 100 8, 540 9, 816, 340 TOTAL $ 4, 510 5, 100 6, 640 7, 470 8, 330 8, 750 9, 100 9, 420 9, 420 10, 270 11, 560 14, 890 15, 840 16, 840 $ 16, 101, 110 Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution Nos. 2017- 864 & 2018- 908.

BY' BASIN $ 1, 360 1, 550 1, 940 2, 320 2, 710 2, 900 3, 050 3, 200 3, 200 3, 580 4, 350 6, 340 6, 780 7, 270 3, 732, 900 PIPE 950 1, 080 1,430 1, 550 1,690 1, 750 1,810 1, 860 1,860 1,990 2, 120 2, 470 2,610 2, 750 2,578, 230 TOTAL $ 2, 310 2, 630 3, 370 3, 870 4, 400 4, 650 4, 860 5, 060 5, 060 5, 570 6, 470 8, 810 9, 390 10, 020 $ 6, 311, 130 BY2 BASIN $ 1, 820 2, 070 2, 600 3, 110 3, 640 3, 890 4, 090 4, 290 4, 290 4, 800 5, 840 8, 490 9, 090 9, 750 4, 277, 390 PIPE 7, 210 8, 150 10, 820 11, 760 12, 770 13, 270 13, 710 14, 070 14, 070 15, 080 16, 090 18, 680 19, 770 20, 850 $ 14, 222, 460 TOTAL $ 9, 030 10, 220 13, 420 14, 870 16, 410 17, 160 17, 800 18, 360 18, 360 19, 880 21, 930 27, 170 28, 860 30, 600 $ 18, 499, 850 Bit BASIN $ 2,830 3, 230 4, 050 4, 850 5,670 6, 070 6, 380 6, 690 6, 690 7, 480 9, 100 13, 240 14, 170 15, 190 $ 3, 600, 920 PIPE 2, 020 2, 280 3, 030 3, 290 3, 570 3, 710 3, 830 3, 930 3, 930 4, 220 4, 500 5, 220 5,530 5, 830 2, 176, 590 TOTAL $ 4, 850 5, 510 7, 080 8, 140 9, 240 9, 780 10, 210 10, 620 10, 620 11, 700 13, 600 18, 460 19, 700 21, 020 $ 5, 777, 510 CD BASIN $ 2,240 2, 560 3, 210 3, 840 4, 490 4, 800 5,050 5, 300 5,300 5, 930 7,210 10, 480 11, 220 12, 030 $ 3, 508, 750 PIPE 4, 090 4, 620 6, 130 6, 660 7, 240 7, 520 7, 770 7, 970 7, 970 8, 540 9, 120 10, 590 11, 200 11, 810 $ 4, 927, 970 TOTAL $ 6, 330 7, 180 9, 340 10, 500 11, 730 12, 320 12, 820 13, 270 13, 270 14, 470 16, 330 21, 070 22, 420 23, 840 $ 8, 436, 720 CE BASIN $ 1, 160 1, 320 1,660 1, 980 2,320 2, 480 2,610 2, 740 2,740 3, 060 3, 730 5, 420 5,800 6, 220 3,432, 410 PIPE 7, 090 8, 010 10, 630 11, 550 12, 540 13, 040 13, 470 13, 820 13, 820 14, 810 15, 800 18, 360 19, 420 20, 480 $ 11, 624, 830 TOTAL $ 8, 250 9, 330 12, 290 13, 530 14, 860 15, 520 16, 080 16, 560 16, 560 17, 870 19, 530 23, 780 25, 220 26, 700 $ 15, 057, 240 CF BASIN $ 940 1, 070 1, 340 1, 600 1, 870 2, 010 2, 110 2, 210 2, 210 2, 470 3, 010 4, 380 4, 690 5, 2, 887, 400 PIPE 6, 300 7, 110 9, 440 10, 260 11, 140 11, 580 11, 960 12, 280 12, 280 13, 160 14, 040 16, 310 17, 250 18, 200 $ 10, 755, 360 TOTAL $ 7, 240 8, 180 10, 780 11, 860 13, 010 13, 590 14, 070 14, 490 14, 490 15, 630 17, 050 20, 690 21, 940 23, 220 $ 13, 642, 760 CG BASIN $ 2, 990 3, 410 4, 280 5, 120 5, 990 6, 410 6, 740 7, 070 7, 070 7, 900 9, 610 13, 980 14, 970 16, 050 $ 5, 628, 190 PIPE 5,910 6, 680 8, 860 9, 630 10, 460 10, 870 11, 230 11, 520 11, 520 12, 350 13, 180 15, 300 16, 190 17, 070 $ 9, 298, 220 TOTAL $ 8, 900 10, 090 13, 140 14, 750 16, 450 17, 280 17, 970 18, 590 18, 590 20, 250 22, 790 29, 280 31, 160 33, 120 $ 14, 926, 410 3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 6 of 14135
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE- 5, A- L, 0 Al, A2, RR R- 1- E, R- 1- EH, R- 1- A, R- 1- AH R- 1- B, R- 1- C, R- 1 40% R- 1 45% R- 1 50% R- 2, M- H R- 3 R- 4, T- P M- 1, M- 2, M- 3, C- P, C- M, R- P C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, Total Cost R- A RE C- R, M- 1- P, S- L C- 4, C- 5, C- 6,
Area C- L, P
CH BASIN $ 1,990 2, 260 2, 840 3, 400 3, 970 4, 250 4, 470 4, 690 4, 690 5, 250 6, 380 9, 280 9, 930 10, 650 $ 3, 853, 320 PIPE 7, 410 8, 370 11, 110 12, 070 13, 110 13, 630 14, 070 14, 440 14, 440 15, 480 16, 520 19, 180 20, 290 21, 410 $ 12, 061, 770 TOTAL $ 9, 400 10, 630 13, 950 15, 470 17, 080 17, 880 18, 540 19, 130 19, 130 20, 730 22, 900 28, 460 30, 220 32, 060 $ 15, 915, 090 CI BASIN $ 2, 080 2, 370 2, 970 3, 560 4, 160 4, 450 4, 680 4, 910 4, 910 5, 490 6, 670 9, 710 10, 400 4 PIPE 3, 390 3, 830 5,080 5, 520 5,990 6, 230 6, 430 6, 600 6, 600 7, 080 7,550 8, 770 9, 280 9, 790 2,769, 720 TOTAL $ 5, 470 6, 200 8, 050 9, 080 10, 150 10, 680 11, 110 11, 510 11, 510 12, 570 14, 220 18, 480 19, 680 20, 930 $ 4, 807, 940 CI BASIN $ 2, 620 2, 990 3, 740 4, 480 5, 240 5, 600 5, 890 6, 180 6, 180 6, 910 8, 410 12, 230 13, 090 14, 040 $ 4, 987, 500 PIPE 6, 030 6, 810 9, 040 9, 830 10, 670 11, 090 11, 450 11, 750 11, 750 12, 600 13, 440 15, 610 16, 520 17, 420 $ 9, 740, 390 TOTAL $ 8, 650 9, 800 12, 780 14, 310 15, 910 16, 690 17, 340 17, 930 17, 930 19, 510 21, 850 27, 840 29, 610 31, 460 $ 14, 727, 890 CK BASIN $ 2,330 2, 660 3, 330 3, 990 4, 660 4, 990 5,250 5, 500 5,500 6, 160 7,490 10, 890 11, 660 12, 500 $ 3, 625, 680 PIPE 5,630 6, 360 8, 440 9, 180 9, 960 10, 360 10, 700 10, 980 10, 980 11, 760 12, 550 14, 580 15, 420 16, 270 $ 7,409, 100 TOTAL $ 7, 960 9, 020 11, 770 13, 170 14, 620 15, 350 15, 950 16, 480 16, 480 17, 920 20, 040 25, 470 27, 080 28, 770 $ 11, 034, 780 CL BASIN $ 850 970 1,210 1, 450 1,700 1, 820 1,910 2, 000 2,000 2, 240 2,730 3, 970 4, 250 55 PIPE 1, 170 1, 330 1, 760 1, 910 2, 080 2, 160 2, 230 2, 290 2, 290 2, 450 2, 620 3, 040 3, 220 3, 390 2, 230, 610 TOTAL $ 2, 020 2, 300 2, 970 3, 360 3, 780 3, 980 4, 140 4, 290 4, 290 4, 690 5, 350 7, 010 7, 470 7, 940 4, 452, 550 CM BASIN $ 350 400 510 610 710 760 800 840 840 940 1, 140 1, 660 1,770 1,900 926, 910 PIPE 740 830 1, 100 1, 200 1, 300 1, 350 1, 400 1, 430 1, 430 1, 540 1, 640 1, 900 2, 010 2, 120 1, 258, 840 TOTAL $ 1, 090 1, 230 1, 610 1, 810 2, 010 2, 110 2, 200 2, 270 2, 270 2, 480 2, 780 3, 560 3, 780 4, 020 2, 185, 750 Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution No. 1228.

CN BASIN $ 200 220 280 340 390 420 440 460 460 520 630 920 980 1, 050 648, 160 PIPE 890 1, 010 1,340 1, 460 1,580 1, 640 1, 700 1, 740 1, 740 1,870 1,990 2, 310 2, 450 2, 580 1,839, 680 TOTAL $ 1, 090 1, 230 1, 620 1, 800 1, 970 2, 060 2, 140 2, 200 2, 200 2, 390 2, 620 3, 230 3, 430 3, 630 2, 487, 840 Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution Nos. 1159, 1392, 1919, & 1922.

CO1 BASIN $ 530 600 750 900 1, 050 1, 130 1, 180 1, 240 1, 240 1, 390 1, 690 2, 460 2, 630 2, 820 446, 571 PIPE 1,640 1, 850 2,460 2, 670 2,900 3, 020 3, 120 3, 200 3, 200 3, 430 3, 660 4, 250 4, 490 4, 740 1, 191, 940 TOTAL $ 2, 170 2, 450 3, 210 3, 570 3, 950 4, 150 4, 300 4, 440 4, 440 4, 820 5, 350 6, 710 7, 120 7, 560 1, 638, 511 CP BASIN $ 3, 700 4, 210 5,290 6, 320 7,390 7, 910 8, 320 8, 720 8, 720 9, 760 11, 860 17, 260 18, 480 19, 810 $ 2,868, 880 PIPE 6, 910 7, 810 10, 370 11, 270 12, 230 12, 720 13, 130 13, 480 13, 480 14, 440 15, 410 17, 900 18, 940 19, 970 $ 4, 262, 800 TOTAL $ 10, 610 12, 020 15, 660 17, 590 19, 620 20, 630 21, 450 22, 200 22, 200 24, 200 27, 270 35, 160 37, 420 39, 780 $ 7, 131, 680 CQ
BASIN $ 2,890 3, 300 4, 140 4, 950 5,790 6, 190 6, 510 6, 830 6, 830 7, 640 9, 290 13, 510 14, 470 15, 510 $ 3, 074, 540 PIPE 4, 890 5, 520 7, 330 7, 970 8, 650 9, 000 9, 290 9, 530 9, 530 10, 220 10, 900 12, 660 13, 400 14, 130 $ 3, 895, 180 TOTAL $ 7, 780 8, 820 11, 470 12, 920 14, 440 15, 190 15, 800 16, 360 16, 360 17, 860 20, 190 26, 170 27, 870 29, 640 $ 6, 969, 720 CS BASIN $ 680 780 970 1, 170 1,360 1,460 1,530 1, 610 1,610 1, 800 2, 190 3, 180 3, 410 3, 650 2,666, 290 PIPE 4, 680 5, 290 7, 030 7, 640 8, 290 8, 620 8, 900 9, 140 9, 140 9, 790 10, 450 12, 130 12, 840 13, 540 $ 10, 167, 680 TOTAL $ 5, 360 6, 070 8, 000 8, 810 9, 650 10, 080 10, 430 10, 750 10, 750 11, 590 12, 640 15, 310 16, 250 17, 190 $ 12, 833, 970 CU BASIN $ 1, 700 1, 940 2, 440 2, 920 3, 410 3, 650 3, 840 4, 020 4, 020 4, 500 5, 470 7, 960 8, 520 9, 140 2, 510, 070 PIPE 4, 100 4, 630 6, 150 6, 680 7, 250 7, 540 7, 780 7, 990 7,990 8, 560 9, 140 10, 610 11, 230 11, 840 $ 3, 345, 280 TOTAL $ 5, 800 6, 570 8, 590 9, 600 10, 660 11, 190 11, 620 12, 010 12, 010 13, 060 14, 610 18, 570 19, 750 20, 980 $ 5, 855, 350 Cy BASIN $ 1, 390 1, 590 1, 990 2, 380 2, 790 2, 980 3, 140 3, 290 3, 290 3, 680 4, 480 6, 510 6, 970 7, 470 2, 173, 940 PIPE 1, 210 1, 370 1,820 1, 980 2, 140 2, 230 2,300 2, 360 2,360 2, 530 2, 700 3, 140 3, 320 3, 500 1,047, 620 TOTAL $ 2, 600 2, 960 3, 810 4, 360 4, 930 5, 210 5, 440 5, 650 5, 650 6, 210 7, 180 9, 650 10, 290 10, 970 $ 3, 221, 560 3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 7 of 14136
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE- 5, A- L, 0 Al, A2, RR R- 1- E, R- 1- EH, R- 1- A, R- 1- AH R- 1- B, R- 1- C, R- 1 40% R- 1 45% R- 1 50% R- 2, M- H R- 3 R- 4, T- P M- 1, M- 2, M- 3, C- P, C- M, R- P C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, Total Cost R- A RE C- R, M- 1- P, S- L C- 4, C- 5, C- 6,
Area C- L, P
CW BASIN $ 690 780 980 1, 170 1,370 1,470 1,540 1, 620 1,620 1, 810 2, 200 3, 200 3, 4307 1,694, 460 PIPE 600 670 890 970 1, 050 1, 100 1, 130 1, 160 1, 160 1, 250 1, 330 1, 540 1, 630 1, 720 1, 005, 380 TOTAL $ 1, 290 1, 450 1, 870 2, 140 2, 420 2, 570 2, 670 2, 780 2, 780 3, 060 3, 530 4, 740 5, 060 5, 390 2, 699, 840 a BASIN $ 810 920 1, 160 1, 390 1, 620 1, 740 1, 820 1, 910 1, 910 2, 140 2, 600 3, 790 4, 050 4, 350 1, 465, 840 PIPE 1, 140 1, 280 1, 700 1, 850 2, 010 2, 090 2, 160 2, 210 2, 210 2, 370 2,530 2, 940 3, 110 3, 280 1,662, 520 TOTAL $ 1, 950 2, 200 2, 860 3, 240 3, 630 3, 830 3, 980 4, 120 4, 120 4, 510 5, 130 6, 730 7, 160 7, 630 3, 128, 360 Cy BASIN $ 790 900 1, 130 1, 350 1, 580 1, 690 1, 780 1, 870 1, 870 2, 090 2, 540 3, 690 3, 960 4, 240 1, 215, 810 PIPE 1, 000 1, 130 1,500 1, 630 1, 770 1,840 1,900 1, 950 1,950 2, 090 2, 230 2, 590 2, 740 2, 890 1,211, 940 TOTAL $ 1, 790 2, 030 2, 630 2, 980 3, 350 3, 530 3, 680 3, 820 3, 820 4, 180 4, 770 6, 280 6, 700 7, 130 2, 427, 750 CZ BASIN $ 550 620 780 940 1,090 1, 170 1,230 1, 290 1,290 1,440 1,760 2, 550 2,740 1,511, 580 PIPE 1, 260 1, 420 1,880 2, 050 2, 220 2, 310 2,380 2, 450 2, 450 2, 620 2,800 3, 250 3, 440 3, 630 2,786, 520 TOTAL $ 1, 810 2, 040 2, 660 2, 990 3, 310 3, 480 3, 610 3, 740 3, 740 4, 060 4, 560 5, 800 6, 180 6, 560 4, 298, 100 DE BASIN $ 1,580 1, 800 2,250 2, 690 3, 150 3, 370 3, 550 3, 720 3, 720 4, 160 5,060 7, 360 7,880 8, 450 3, 097, 350 PIPE 2, 100 2, 370 3, 150 3, 420 3, 720 3, 870 3, 990 4, 100 4, 100 4, 390 4, 680 5, 440 5, 760 6, 070 3, 296, 380 TOTAL $ 3, 680 4, 170 5, 400 6, 110 6, 870 7, 240 7, 540 7, 820 7, 820 8, 550 9, 740 12, 800 13, 640 14, 520 $ 6, 393, 730 Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution No. 2006- 486.

DF BASIN $ 570 650 820 970 1, 140 1, 220 1,280 1, 350 1,350 1, 510 1,830 2, 660 2,850 3, 060 165, 172 PIPE 1, 070 1, 210 1, 610 1, 750 1, 900 1, 970 2, 040 2, 090 2, 090 2, 240 2, 390 2, 780 2, 940 3, 100 283, 883 TOTAL $ 1, 640 1, 860 2, 430 2, 720 3, 040 3, 190 3, 320 3, 440 3, 440 3, 750 4, 220 5, 440 5, 790 6, 160 449, 055 DG BASIN $ 720 830 1, 040 1, 240 1, 450 1, 550 1, 630 1, 710 1, 710 1, 910 2, 320 3, 380 3, 620 3, 880 447, 419 PIPE 1, 260 1, 430 1,900 2, 060 2, 240 2, 320 2, 400 2, 460 2, 460 2, 640 2,820 3, 270 3, 460 3, 650 720, 114 TOTAL $ 1, 980 2, 260 2, 940 3, 300 3, 690 3, 870 4, 030 4, 170 4, 170 4, 550 5, 140 6, 650 7, 080 7, 530 1, 167, 533 DH BASIN $ 860 980 1, 230 1, 470 1, 720 1, 840 1, 930 2, 030 2, 030 2, 270 2, 760 4, 010 4, 290 4, 600 1, 590, 510 PIPE 960 1, 080 1, 440 1, 560 1,690 1, 760 1,820 1, 870 1,870 2, 000 2, 130 2, 480 2,620 2, 770 1, 109, 580 TOTAL $ 1, 820 2, 060 2, 670 3, 030 3, 410 3, 600 3, 750 3, 900 3, 900 4, 270 4, 890 6, 490 6, 910 7, 370 2, 700, 090 DI BASIN $ 460 520 650 780 920 980 1,030 1, 080 1,080 1, 210 1,470 2, 140 2,290 2, 450 219, 705 PIPE 750 850 1, 120 1, 220 1,330 1, 380 1, 420 1, 460 1, 460 1, 570 1,670 1,940 2, 050 2, 170 326, 191 TOTAL $ 1, 210 1, 370 1, 770 2, 000 2, 250 2, 360 2, 450 2, 540 2, 540 2, 780 3, 140 4, 080 4, 340 4, 620 545, 896 DK BASIN $ 210 240 300 350 410 440 460 490 490 550 660 960 1,030 1, 110 955, 890 PIPE 1, 790 2, 020 2, 680 2, 910 3, 160 3, 290 3, 400 3, 490 3, 490 3, 740 3, 990 4, 630 4, 900 5, 170 6, 946, 640 TOTAL $ 2, 000 2, 260 2, 980 3, 260 3, 570 3, 730 3, 860 3, 980 3, 980 4, 290 4, 650 5, 590 5, 930 6, 280 7, 902, 530 DL BASIN $ 2,750 3, 130 3, 930 4, 690 5,490 5, 880 6, 180 6, 480 6, 480 7, 250 8, 810 12, 820 13, 730 14, 720 $ 3, 199, 720 PIPE 4, 760 5, 380 7, 140 7, 760 8, 420 8, 760 9, 040 9, 280 9, 280 9, 950 10, 610 12, 320 13, 040 13, 750 $ 3, 896, 570 TOTAL $ 7, 510 8, 510 11, 070 12, 450 13, 910 14, 640 15, 220 15, 760 15, 760 17, 200 19, 420 25, 140 26, 770 28, 470 $ 7, 096, 290 DM BASIN $ 2, 070 2, 360 2, 960 3, 530 4, 130 4, 420 4, 650 4, 880 4, 880 5, 460 6, 640 9, 650 10, 340 11, 080 $ 5, 060, 300 PIPE 6, 730 7, 610 10, 100 10, 980 11, 920 12, 390 12, 800 13, 130 13, 130 14, 080 15, 020 17, 440 18, 450 19, 460 $ 13, 593, 740 TOTAL $ 8, 800 9, 970 13, 060 14, 510 16, 050 16, 810 17, 450 18, 010 18, 010 19, 540 21, 660 27, 090 28, 790 30, 540 $ 18, 654, 040 DN BASIN $ 2, 940 3, 350 4, 200 5, 020 5, 880 6, 290 6, 610 6, 930 6, 930 7, 760 9, 430 13, 720 14, 690 15, 750 $ 6, 387, 150 PIPE 3, 910 4, 420 5,870 6, 380 6, 930 7, 200 7, 440 7, 630 7,630 8, 180 8, 730 10, 140 10, 730 11, 310 $ 7, 248, 180 TOTAL $ 6, 850 7, 770 10, 070 11, 400 12, 810 13, 490 14, 050 14, 560 14, 560 15, 940 18, 160 23, 860 25, 420 27, 060 $ 13, 635, 330 Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution Nos. 2016- 840 & 2018- 908. 3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 8 of 14137
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE- 5, A- L, 0 Al, A2, RR R- 1- E, R- 1- EH, R- 1- A, R- 1- AH R- 1- B, R- 1- C, R- 1 40% R- 1 45% R- 1 50% R- 2, M- H R- 3 R- 4, T- P M- 1, M- 2, M- 3, C- P, C- M, R- P C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, Total Cost R- A RE C- R, M- 1- P, S- L C- 4, C- 5, C- 6,
Area C- L, P
DO BASIN $ 1,990 2, 260 2, 840 3, 400 3, 970 4, 250 4, 470 4, 690 4, 690 5, 240 6, 380 9, 280 9, 930 10, 650 $ 6, 058, 270 PIPE 2, 950 3, 340 4, 430 4, 810 5, 230 5, 430 5, 610 5, 760 5, 760 6, 170 6, 580 7, 650 8, 090 8, 530 6, 993, 820 TOTAL $ 4, 940 5, 600 7, 270 8, 210 9, 200 9, 680 10, 080 10, 450 10, 450 11, 410 12, 960 16, 930 18, 020 19, 180 $ 13, 052, 090 Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution Nos. 2007- 522, 2014- 806, 2018- 887, 2018- 908, & 2020- 959 DP BASIN $ 1, 830 2, 080 2, 610 3, 130 3, 660 3, 910 4, 110 4, 310 4, 310 4, 830 5, 870 8, 540 9, 140 9, 800 6, 826, 920 P IPE 6, 300 7, 120 9, 450 10, 260 11, 150 11, 590 11, 960 12, 280 12, 280 13, 160 14, 040 16, 310 17, 250 18, 200 $ 17, 510, 400 TOTAL $ 8, 130 9, 200 12, 060 13, 390 14, 810 15, 500 16, 070 16, 590 16, 590 17, 990 19, 910 24, 850 26, 390 28, 000 $ 24, 337, 320 DQ
BASIN $ 6, 430 7, 330 9, 190 10, 990 12, 860 13, 760 14, 470 15, 170 15, 170 16, 970 20, 640 30, 020 32, 150 34, 460 $ 5, 304, 770 P IPE 5,410 6, 110 8, 120 8, 820 9, 580 9, 960 10, 280 10, 550 10, 550 11, 310 12, 070 14, 020 14, 830 15, 640 $ 3, 842, 840 TOTAL $ 11, 840 13, 440 17, 310 19, 810 22, 440 23, 720 24, 750 25, 720 25, 720 28, 280 32, 710 44, 040 46, 980 50, 100 $ 9, 147, 610 DS BASIN $ 2,720 3, 100 3, 890 4, 650 5,440 5, 820 6, 120 6, 420 6, 420 7, 180 8, 730 12, 700 13, 600 14, 580 $ 11, 778, 760 PIPE 6, 270 7, 080 9, 400 10, 220 11, 090 11, 530 11, 910 12, 220 12, 220 13, 100 13, 980 16, 230 17, 170 18, 110 $ 21, 927, 070 TOTAL $ 8, 990 10, 180 13, 290 14, 870 16, 530 17, 350 18, 030 18, 640 18, 640 20, 280 22, 710 28, 930 30, 770 32, 690 $ 33, 705, 830 DV BASIN $ 760 860 1,080 1, 290 1,510 1, 620 1,700 1, 780 1,780 2, 000 2,430 3, 530 3, 780 4, 050 1,568, 490 P IPE 6, 900 7, 790 10, 340 11, 240 12, 210 12, 690 13, 100 13, 450 13, 450 14, 410 15, 380 17, 860 18, 890 19, 930 $ 8, 342, 370 TOTAL $ 7, 660 8, 650 11, 420 12, 530 13, 720 14, 310 14, 800 15, 230 15, 230 16, 410 17, 810 21, 390 22, 670 23, 980 $ 9, 910, 860 EF BASIN $ 1,640 1, 870 2,350 2, 810 3, 290 3, 520 3, 700 3, 880 3, 880 4, 340 5,280 7, 670 8, 220 8, 810 3, 310, 480 P IPE 890 1, 010 1, 340 1, 460 1, 580 1, 650 1, 700 1, 740 1, 740 1, 870 1, 990 2, 320 2, 450 2, 590 1, 418, 420 TOTAL $ 2, 530 2, 880 3, 690 4, 270 4, 870 5, 170 5, 400 5, 620 5, 620 6, 210 7, 270 9, 990 10, 670 11, 400 $ 4, 728, 900 EG BASIN $ 900 1, 020 1, 280 1, 530 1, 790 1, 920 2, 010 2, 110 2, 110 2, 360 2, 870 4, 180 4, 480 4, 800 2, 119, 330 P IPE 1,800 2, 040 2, 700 2, 940 3, 190 3, 320 3, 420 3, 510 3, 510 3, 770 4, 020 4, 670 4, 940 5, 210 3, 187, 930 TOTAL $ 2, 700 3, 060 3, 980 4, 470 4, 980 5, 240 5, 430 5, 620 5, 620 6, 130 6, 890 8, 850 9, 420 10, 010 $ 5, 307, 260 EH BASIN $ 1, 370 1, 570 1, 960 2, 350 2, 750 2, 940 3, 090 3, 240 3, 240 3, 630 4, 410 6, 420 6, 870 7, 370 4, 248, 510 PIPE 2,610 2, 950 3,920 4, 260 4, 630 4, 810 4, 970 5, 100 5, 100 5, 460 5,830 6, 770 7, 160 7, 560 5, 121, 320 TOTAL $ 3, 980 4, 520 5, 880 6, 610 7, 380 7, 750 8, 060 8, 340 8, 340 9, 090 10, 240 13, 190 14, 030 14, 930 $ 9, 369, 830 EI BASIN $ 3, 370 3, 850 4, 820 5, 770 6, 750 7, 220 7,590 7, 960 7,960 8, 910 10, 830 15, 760 16, 870 18, 080 $ 2,809, 810 P IPE 3, 480 3, 940 5,230 5, 680 6, 170 6, 410 6, 620 6, 790 6, 790 7, 280 7, 770 9, 020 9, 550 10, 070 $ 1,725, 530 TOTAL $ 6, 850 7, 790 10, 050 11, 450 12, 920 13, 630 14, 210 14, 750 14, 750 16, 190 18, 600 24, 780 26, 420 28, 150 $ 4, 535, 340 E) BASIN $ 4, 120 4, 700 5,900 7, 050 8, 250 8, 830 9, 280 9, 730 9, 730 10, 890 13, 240 19, 260 20, 620 22, 110 $ 4, 200, 810 P IPE 4, 950 5, 590 7, 430 8, 070 8, 760 9, 110 9, 410 9, 650 9, 650 10, 350 11, 040 12, 820 13, 560 14, 310 $ 4, 354, 250 TOTAL $ 9, 070 10, 290 13, 330 15, 120 17, 010 17, 940 18, 690 19, 380 19, 380 21, 240 24, 280 32, 080 34, 180 36, 420 $ 8, 555, 060 EK BASIN $ 390 450 560 670 780 840 880 920 920 1, 030 1,260 1, 830 1,950 2, 100 655, 050 P IPE 1, 880 2, 130 2, 830 3, 070 3, 340 3, 470 3, 580 3, 670 3, 670 3, 940 4, 200 4, 880 5, 160 5, 450 2, 569, 900 TOTAL $ 2, 270 2, 580 3, 390 3, 740 4, 120 4, 310 4, 460 4, 590 4, 590 4, 970 5, 460 6, 710 7, 110 7, 550 3, 224, 950 EL BASIN $ 2, 130 2, 430 3, 040 3, 640 4, 260 4, 550 4, 790 5, 020 5, 020 5, 620 6, 830 9, 940 10, 640 11, 410 $ 1, 026, 890 PIPE 1, 470 1, 660 2, 210 2, 400 2,610 2, 710 2,800 2, 870 2,870 3, 080 3, 280 3, 810 4, 030 4, 250 393, 890 TOTAL $ 3, 600 4, 090 5, 250 6, 040 6, 870 7, 260 7, 590 7, 890 7, 890 8, 700 10, 110 13, 750 14, 670 15, 660 $ 1, 420, 780 EM BASIN $ 1, 970 2, 250 2, 820 3, 370 3, 940 4, 220 4, 430 4, 650 4, 650 5, 200 6, 330 9, 200 9, 850 10, 560 $ 2, 557, 150 P IPE 3, 120 3, 520 4, 680 5, 080 5,520 5, 740 5,930 6, 080 6, 080 6, 520 6, 960 8, 080 8, 550 9, 010 3, 124, 830 TOTAL $ 5, 090 5, 770 7, 500 8, 450 9, 460 9, 960 10, 360 10, 730 10, 730 11, 720 13, 290 17, 280 18, 400 19, 570 $ 5, 681, 980 3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 9 of 14138
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE- 5, A- L, 0 Al, A2, RR R- 1- E, R- 1- EH, R- 1- A, R- 1- AH R- 1- B, R- 1- C, R- 1 40% R- 1 45% R- 1 50% R- 2, M- H R- 3 R- 4, T- P M- 1, M- 2, M- 3, C- P, C- M, R- P C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, Total Cost R- A RE C- R, M- 1- P, 5- L C- 4, C- 5, C- 6,
Area C- L, P
EN BASIN $ 1,590 1, 810 2,270 2, 710 3, 170 3, 400 3, 570 3, 740 3, 740 4, 190 5,090 7, 410 7,930 8, 500 3, 283, 070 PIPE 6, 040 6, 830 9, 060 9, 850 10, 690 11, 110 11, 480 11, 780 11, 780 12, 620 13, 470 15, 640 16, 550 17, 460 $ 8, 318, 460 TOTAL $ 7, 630 8, 640 11, 330 12, 560 13, 860 14, 510 15, 050 15, 520 15, 520 16, 810 18, 560 23, 050 24, 480 25, 960 $ 11, 601, 530 EO BASIN $ 2, 980 3, 390 4, 260 5, 090 5, 960 6, 370 6, 700 7, 030 7, 030 7, 860 9, 560 13, 910 14, 890 15, 960 $ 4, 971, 020 PIPE 2,850 3, 220 4, 280 4, 650 5,050 5, 250 5,420 5, 560 5,560 5, 960 6, 360 7, 390 7,820 8, 250 3, 966, 870 TOTAL $ 5, 830 6, 610 8, 540 9, 740 11, 010 11, 620 12, 120 12, 590 12, 590 13, 820 15, 920 21, 300 22, 710 24, 210 $ 8, 937, 890 NN BASIN $ 1, 610 1, 830 2, 300 2, 750 3, 210 3, 440 3, 610 3, 790 3, 790 4, 240 5, 160 7, 500 8, 030 8, 610 4, 033, 230 PIPE 3, 670 4, 150 5,510 5, 990 6, 500 6, 760 6, 980 7, 160 7, 160 7, 680 8, 190 9, 510 10, 060 10, 610 $ 7, 155, 400 TOTAL $ 5, 280 5, 980 7, 810 8, 740 9, 710 10, 200 10, 590 10, 950 10, 950 11, 920 13, 350 17, 010 18, 090 19, 220 $ 11, 188, 630 16 BASIN $ 1,330 1, 330 1,670 1, 990 2,330 2, 500 2,620 2, 750 2,750 3, 080 3, 740 5, 450 5,830 6, 250 1,660, 870 PIPE 1,380 1, 380 1,830 1, 980 2, 150 2, 240 2,310 2, 370 2,370 2, 540 2, 710 3, 150 3, 330 3, 520 1,541, 159 TOTAL $ 2, 710 2, 710 3, 500 3, 970 4, 480 4, 740 4, 930 5, 120 5, 120 5, 620 6, 450 8, 600 9, 160 9, 770 3, 202, 029 36 BASIN $ 2, 130 2, 430 3, 050 3, 650 4, 270 4, 560 4, 800 5, 030 5,030 5, 630 6, 850 9, 960 10, 670 11, 430 $ 4, 649, 160 PIPE 2, 260 2, 560 3, 390 3, 690 4, 010 4, 160 4, 300 4, 410 4, 410 4, 730 5, 050 5, 860 6, 200 6, 540 4, 154, 740 TOTAL $ 4, 390 4, 990 6, 440 7, 340 8, 280 8, 720 9, 100 9, 440 9, 440 10, 360 11, 900 15, 820 16, 870 17, 970 $ 8, 803, 900 7C BASIN $ 1,950 2, 230 2,790 3, 340 3, 910 4, 180 4, 400 4, 610 4, 610 5, 160 6, 270 9, 120 9, 770 10, 470 $ 3, 835, 680 PIPE 1, 230 1, 390 1, 840 2, 000 2, 170 2, 260 2, 330 2, 390 2, 390 2, 570 2, 740 3, 180 3, 360 3, 550 1, 731, 900 TOTAL $ 3, 180 3, 620 4, 630 5, 340 6, 080 6, 440 6, 730 7, 000 7, 000 7, 730 9, 010 12, 300 13, 130 14, 020 $ 5, 567, 580 7D BASIN $ 2, 140 2, 440 3, 060 3, 660 4, 290 4, 590 4, 820 5, 060 5, 060 5, 660 6, 880 10, 010 10, 710 11, 480 $ 3, 756, 650 PIPE 1,830 2, 060 2, 740 2, 980 3, 230 3, 360 3, 470 3, 560 3, 560 3, 820 4, 070 4, 730 5,010 5, 280 2,216, 710 TOTAL $ 3, 970 4, 500 5, 800 6, 640 7, 520 7, 950 8, 290 8, 620 8, 620 9, 480 10, 950 14, 740 15, 720 16, 760 $ 5, 973, 360 Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution Nos. 2005- 980 & 2018- 908. 7H BASIN $ 2, 290 2, 610 3, 280 3, 920 4, 580 4, 900 5, 150 5, 410 5, 410 6, 050 7, 350 10, 700 11, 450 12, 280 $ 5, 192, 980 PIPE 4, 590 5, 180 6, 880 7, 480 8, 120 8, 440 8, 710 8, 940 8, 940 9, 590 10, 230 11, 880 12, 570 13, 250 $ 7, 363, 960 TOTAL $ 6, 880 7, 790 10, 160 11, 400 12, 700 13, 340 13, 860 14, 350 14, 350 15, 640 17, 580 22, 580 24, 020 25, 530 $ 12, 556, 940 Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution Nos. 2005- 980 & 2018- 908. 3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 10 of 14139
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 2: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE- 5, A- L, 0 Al, A2, RR R- 1- E, R- 1- EH, R- 1- A, R- 1- AH R- 1- B, R- 1- C, R- 1 40% R- 1 45% R- 1 50% R- 2, M- H R- 3 R- 4, T- P M- 1, M- 2, M- 3, C- P, C- M, R- P C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, Total Cost R- A RE C- R, M- 1- P, S- L C- 4, C- 5, C- 6,
Area C- L, P
Zone 2 BASIN $ 750 850 1, 070 1, 280 1, 490 1, 600 1,680 1, 760 1,760 1,970 2, 390 3, 480 3,730 4, 000 $ 83, 994, 458 PIPE 1, 610 1, 820 2, 420 2, 630 2, 850 2, 970 3, 060 3, 140 3, 140 3, 370 3, 590 4, 180 4, 420 4, 660 $ 127, 397, 730 TOTAL $ 2, 360 2, 670 3, 490 3, 910 4, 340 4, 570 4, 740 4, 900 4, 900 5, 340 5, 980 7, 660 8, 150 8, 660 $ 211, 392, 188 Planned Local Drianage Areas: Zone 2
Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total A 2, 299, 010 $ 1,716, 030 $ 4, 015, 040 X 1,839, 287 $ 448, 581 $ 2, 287, 868 00 2, 241, 180 $ 790, 011 $ 3, 031, 191 B 1, 050, 726 $ 142, 170 $ 1, 192, 896 Y 1, 175, 737 $ 2, 265, 162 $ 3, 440, 899 PP 1, 827, 799 $ 1, 220, 346 $ 3, 048, 145 C 479, 953 $ 317, 414 $ 797, 367 Z 1, 121, 879 $ 2, 525, 668 $ 3, 647, 547 ** RR 5, 178, 163 $ 18, 328, 132 $ 23, 506, 295 D 801, 395 $ 694, 153 $ 1, 495, 548 AA 978, 116 $ 1, 343, 241 $ 2, 321, 357 SS 2, 525, 088 $ 3, 296, 790 $ 5, 821, 878 E 777, 422 $ 228, 063 $ 1, 005, 485 BB 499, 109 $ 822, 774 $ 1, 321, 883 Ti 1,959, 614 $ 1,599, 471 $ 3, 559, 085 F 284, 535 $ 302, 016 $ 586, 551 CC 465, 921 $ 2, 085, 168 $ 2, 551, 089 UU1 474, 282 $ 1, 155, 629 $ 1, 629, 911 G 1, 153, 808 $ 157, 007 $ 1, 310, 815 CO2 904, 070 $ 1, 424, 260 $ 2, 328, 330 UU2 1, 590, 601 $ 1, 686, 286 $ 3, 276, 887 H 99, 858 $ 214, 682 $ 314, 540 DD 1,896, 981 $ 7, 725, 461 $ 9, 622, 442 UU3 3, 419, 421 $ 9, 617, 554 $ 13, 036, 975 I 227, 828 $ 248, 025 $ 475, 853 EE 754, 118 $ 3, 358, 704 $ 4, 112, 822 W 34, 124 $ 116, 961 $ 151, 085 3 1,682, 005 $ 435, 847 $ 2, 117, 852 FF 1,433, 799 $ 9, 604, 610 $ 11, 038, 409 WW 18, 653 $ 360, 044 $ 378, 697 K 1,040, 301 $ 677, 207 $ 1, 717, 508 GO 2,485, 389 $ 1, 539, 639 $ 4, 025, 028 XX 1,025, 092 $ 2, 174, 474 $ 3, 199, 566 L 662, 320 $ 494, 850 $ 1, 157, 170 HH 4, 200, 015 $ 5, 506, 475 $ 9, 706, 490 ZZ 2, 565, 696 $ 2, 869, 195 $ 5, 434, 891 M 967, 464 $ 257, 885 $ 1, 225, 349 II1 4, 819, 438 $ 16, 627, 228 $ 21, 446, 666 N 482, 052 $ 434, 159 $ 916, 211 II2 7, 945, 847 $ 1, 306, 882 $ 9, 252, 729 O 1,046, 970 $ 190, 138 $ 1, 237, 108 II3 1,745, 301 $ 1, 672, 599 $ 3, 417, 900 P 884, 478 $ 277, 552 $ 1, 162, 030 II4 2,259, 789 $ 1, 113, 110 $ 3, 372, 899 T 1, 731, 054 $ 2, 463, 036 $ 4, 194, 090 JJ 2, 039, 095 $ 3, 846, 098 $ 5, 885, 193 U 1,454, 875 $ 672, 938 $ 2, 127, 813 KK 1,999, 167 $ 1,486, 803 $ 3, 485, 970 660, 035 $ 1, 726, 395 $ 2, 386, 430 LL 2, 283, 613 $ 3, 412, 009 $ 5, 695, 622 W 1,934, 684 $ 3,474, 333 $ 5, 409, 017 * MM 567, 301 $ 944, 465 $ 1, 511, 766 W * Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution No. 885- BPBR.

Z ** Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution Nos. 1227, 1265, 1268, 1386. 3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 11 of 14140
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 3: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE- 5, A- L, 0 Al, A2, RR R- 1- E, R- 1- EH, R- 1- A, R- 1- AH R- 1- B, R- 1- C, R- 1 40% R- 1 45% R- 1 50% R- 2, M- H R- 3 R- 4, T- P M- 1, M- 2, M- 3, C- P, C- M, R- P C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, Total Cost R- A RE C- R, M- 1- P, 5- L C- 4, C- 5, C- 6,
Area C- L, P
Zone 3 BASIN $ 1, 410 1, 600 2, 010 2, 410 2, 820 3, 010 3, 170 3, 320 3, 320 3, 720 4, 520 6, 570 7, 040 7, 550 $ 25, 987, 808 PIPE 1, 520 1, 720 2, 280 2, 480 2, 690 2, 800 2, 890 2, 970 2, 970 3, 180 3, 400 3, 940 4, 170 4, 400 $ 20, 111, 594 TOTAL $ 2, 930 3, 320 4, 290 4, 890 5, 510 5, 810 6, 060 6, 290 6, 290 6, 900 7, 920 10, 510 11, 210 11, 950 $ 46, 099, 402 Planned Local Drianage Areas: Zone 3
Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total
Q 393, 027 $ 411, 805 $ 804, 832
S 1, 310, 299 $ 2, 270, 780 $ 3, 581, 079
1E 2, 104, 757 $ 933, 226 $ 3, 037, 983
2D 831, 893 $ 1, 423, 085 $ 2, 254, 978
3A 1, 332, 641 $ 913, 853 $ 2, 246, 494
3D 1, 427, 625 $ 1, 032, 196 $ 2, 459, 821
3F 1, 105, 476 $ 1, 224, 524 $ 2, 330, 000
4B 1, 549, 023 $ 988, 399 $ 2, 537, 422
4C 1, 144, 187 $ 2, 383, 951 $ 3, 528, 138
4D 3, 623, 973 $ 1, 032, 287 $ 4, 656, 260
4E 3, 631, 939 $ 2, 148, 572 $ 5, 780, 511
58/ 5C 4, 484, 990 $ 2, 231, 625 $ 6, 716, 615
5F 1, 589, 077 $ 1, 530, 399 $ 3, 119, 476
6D 1, 458, 901 $ 1, 586, 892 $ 3, 045, 793
3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 12 of 14141
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR SURCHARGE AREAS: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE- 5, A- L, 0 Al, A2, RR R- 1- E, R- 1- EH, R- 1- A, R- 1- AH R- 1- B, R- 1- C, R- 1 40% R- 1 45% R- 1 50% R- 2, M- H R- 3 R- 4, T- P M- 1, M- 2, M- 3, C- P, C- M, R- P C- 1, C- 2, C- 3, R- A RE C- R, M- 1- P, 5- L C- 4, C- 5, C- 6,
Area C- L, P
W
TOTAL 11, 075
Note: Surcharge Resolution: 885- BPBR
Z
TOTAL 1, 970 2, 110 2, 250 2, 615 5, 380 2, 915
Note: Surcharge Resolution: 1386
BX
TOTAL 270 360 390 430 445 445 445 470 510 540 630 660 700 Note: Surcharge Resolution: 2008- 590
BX
TOTAL 14, 310
Note: Surcharge Resolution: 2017- 884
CM
TOTAL $ 90 105 135 145 160 165 165 165 175 185 200 235 485 260 Note: Surcharge Resolution: 1228
CN
TOTAL 2, 200 2, 395 2, 695 3, 465 3, 690 3, 925
Note: Surcharge Resolution: 1422
DE
TOTAL 790 790 790 840 900 1, 120 1, 250 1, 250
Note: Surcharge Resolution: 2006- 486
DN
TOTAL 11, 270 11, 640 11, 940 11, 940 17, 700
Note: Surcharge Resolution: 2017- 884
DO
TOTAL 4, 350 4, 350 4, 660 4, 660 6, 110 6, 440
Note: Surcharge Resolution: 2018- 887
DO
TOTAL 4, 140 4, 140 5, 720
Note: Surcharge Resolution: 2020- 959
7D
TOTAL 5, 555
Note: Surcharge Resolution: 2005- 480
7H
TOTAL 5, 555
Note: Surcharge Resolution: 2005- 480
3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 13 of 14142
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

Fresno County Effective Date: 3/ 1/ 2022
Fresno
Metropolitan
Flood Control District i. 1.: A
Legend I
r_.____
I
1 5.; ft[ Urge areas
easire l
Ai 1?+
H.. no Sr'pFereof Influence
L= 3 r Al 1'
Frey A6 Sphere of Influence
lV I
Clovis Influence —
Herndon- Ave— dOii• A•Y
1 Irr
r
rl..

I. 1- 1'
I. II
1 k 11 i IdIJ
in' II
Fnbno
The nm> o I. drmolren Hood mrtral MS4Mill
Daum( pmroma and r.ma& lb 1nrvmrum
kk
WV Aiipolt I
rm Ea oxn Prrmsa and 1:151:EIrlwmo[ bn
may no[ ha aurahk fir o[ lcr aum= a.

I
rt mna Warm is pray dldo as rtierur
ikiarrcrrmon or Vila flora cal ho
I
elfalrel b? mnrallr¢ Prim=
I
n molren hood[ brtrol L .
naa r Rlarrcd nmo¢ rrcn4 fii
NMI[- Dix Ax f' r[ ao, CA, 97733
Ild: 035043R3292 E* 1jf ' nt
Fresno b
3/ 2022 2022 FMFCD 14 of 14143
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Finance Department
DATE: January 18, 2022
SUBJECT:1 Consider Actions related to Annexation of Territory (Annexation # 72, T6349 - NEC Shaw/Locan & T6377 SEC Shaw/Leonard ) to the City of Clovis Community Facilities District No. 2004 -1 (Police and Fire Services).

a. Consider Approval - Res. 2 2-___, A Resolution annexing territory (Annexation # 72) ( T6349 - NEC Shaw/Locan & T6377 SEC
Shaw/Leonard) to the City of Clovis Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Police and Fire Services) and calling a special landowner election to annex territory (Annexation #72) to City of Clovis Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Police and Fire Services).

b. Consider Approval - Res. 22-___, A Resolution of the City of Clovis declaring the results of a special landowner election and directing recording of the Notice of Special Tax Lien for City of Clovis Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Police and Fire Services).

Staff: Jay Schengel, Finance Director
Recommendation: Approve
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution of Annexation

2. Resolution Declaring Results

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

RECOMMENDATION
 That the Council hold a public hearing and approve actions related to the Annexation of Territory (Annexation #72) to Community Facilities District No. 2004-1.

 Consider Approval – Res. 22-___, A Resolution of annexation of territory (Annexation #72) to the Community Facilities District (City of Clovis Community Facilities District 144
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.

No. 2004-1) and to authorize the levy of Special Taxes therein and submitting Levy of Special Taxes to Qualified Electors.

 Call for Special Election and have Clerk announce the vote.

 Consider Approval – Res. 22-___, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Clovis Declaring the Results of the Special Annexation Election; Determining Validity of Prior Proceedings and Directing Recording of the Notice of Special Tax Lien (City of Clovis Community Facilities District No. 2004-1) (Police and Fire Services).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Since the condition to establish a CFD was imposed on the developments being processed by the City, developments proceeding after March 8, 2004, must petition to be annexed to the existing CFD. Several property owners have submitted petitions to annex territory to the Community Facilities District 2004 -1 and to include their property within the District as provided by the conditions of approval of the development entitlements.

To initiate the process for annexation of territory to a CFD, the Council approved a Resolution of Intention-Annexation #72 (ROI) to annex territory to the CFD on December 13, 2021. The ROI set a public hearing for January 18, 2022. The action today finalizes the annexation to the CFD.

BACKGROUND
Since the condition to establish a CFD was imposed on the developments being processed by the City, developments proceeding after March 8, 2004 , must petition to be annexed to the existing CFD. Several property owners have submitted petitions to annex territory to the Community Facilities District 2004 -1 and to include their property within the District as provided by the conditions of approval of the development entitlements.

To initiate the process for annexation of territory to a CFD, the Council approved a Resolution of Intention-Annexation #72 (ROI) to annex territory to the CFD. The ROI set a public hearing for January 18, 2022. The Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA) referred to in the ROI is the same as adopted by the Council with the Resolution of Formation adopted March 8, 2004. RMA provides, among other things, definitions, identifies what properties will be taxed, and the maximum special tax.

The conditions as provided in the Rate and Method of Apportionment will apply to territory annexed to the Community Facilities Districts to provide funding for public safety operations in new growth areas. The major conditions include:

1. The maximum annual tax will be $265.88 for single family residential and $229.56 for multi-family residential.

2. The maximum tax will be increased by the Escalator Factor, which is the greater of the change in CPI or percentage change in population.

3. There will be a review not later than five years of inception of the CFD.

4. The annual tax will not apply to commercially zoned property. 145
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.

5. The tax will apply only to that property for which a building permit is issued after January 1, 2004.

6. The costs of salary and benefit increases funded by the CFD will be limited to the Escalator Factor.

The purpose of the hearing is to take public comment on the annexation of territory to the CFD and to accept protests from any interested person within the proposed bound aries. If no property owner protests are received, the Council may take the initial actions to annex the territory to the CFD by approving a resolution on the annexation to the CFD and calling a special property owner election. Once the election is calle d, the City Clerk tabulates the ballots. If the property owners of two -thirds (2/3) of the property within the proposed boundaries vote in favor of the CFD, then the Council can take action to direct the recording of Notice of Special Tax Lien. A unanimo us vote is required to have the election the same night as approval of the resolution of annexation. The recording of the Tax Lien is contingent upon the property being annexed to the City. The property included within the CFD is being processed for anne xation to the City and the Local Agency Formation Commission has approved the annexations.

After the annexation is complete and the Notice of Tax Lien has been recorded, any final maps within the CFD may be recorded and construction permits for homes can be issued.

One of the conditions of the CFD is that the tax will only be collected on those properties where a building permit for a residence has been issued.

FISCAL IMPACT
If approved, residential units built within the boundaries of the CFD will be assessed annually according to the conditions of the CFD formation and those assessments will be utilized to fund police and fire services.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
All requirements for the annexation of territory to the CFD have been completed and the Council may take action to annex territory to the CFD.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
After approval of the resolution directing the recordation of the Notice of Tax Lien, the lien will be recorded.

Prepared by: Steve Nourian, Senior Accounting Systems Technician

Reviewed by: City Manager JH
146
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.

ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO. 22-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS APPROVING

ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND TO

AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF

SPECIAL TAXES TO QUALIFIED ELECTORS

CITY OF CLOVIS
Community Services District No. 2004-1
(Police and Fire Services)
Annexation No. 72

WHEREAS, this Council, on December 13 , 202 1, adopted A Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory to the Community Services District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein (the “Resolution of Intention”) stating its intention to annex the territory to the City’s Community Services District 2004-1 (the “District”), pursuant to Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Sections 53311 and following of the California Government Code (the “Act”); and

WHEREAS, a copy of the Resolution of Intention, incorporating a description and map of the proposed boundaries of the territory to be annexed to the District and stating the services to be provided and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to pay for the services for the District, is on file with the Clerk of the Council and the provisions thereof are fully incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein; and

WHEREAS, on the date hereof, this Council held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act and the Resolution of Intention relative to the proposed annexation of territory to the District; and

WHEREAS, at such hearing all interested persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the annexation of territory to the District and the levy of said special taxes within the area proposed to be annexed were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and

WHEREAS, prior to the time fixed for said hearing, written protests had not been filed against the proposed annexation of territory to the District by (i) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the existing District, or (ii) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the territory proposed to be annexed to the District, or (iii) owners of one -half or more of the area of land in the territory proposed to be annexed to the District; and

WHEREAS, Annexation Map No. 72 to the District, has been filed with the City Clerk, which map shows the territory to be annexed in these proceedings, and a copy thereof is on file with the City Clerk.
147
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,

1. All prior proceedings taken by this Council with respect to the District and the proposed annexation of territory thereto have been duly considered and are hereby determined to be valid and in conformity with the Act, and the District has been validly established pursuant to the Act.

2. The description and map of the boundaries of the territory to be annexed to District, as described in said Annexation Map No. 72 to the District on file with the Clerk are hereby finally approved, are incorporated herein by reference, and shall be included within the bou ndaries of the District, and said territory is hereby ordered annexed to the District, subject to voter approval of the levy of the special taxes therein as hereinafter provided.

3. The provisions of the Resolution of Intention and Resolution No. 21-147 adopted by this Council for the District on December 13, 2021, each as heretofore adopted by this Council are by this reference incorporated herein, as if fully set forth herein.

4. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the proposition of the levy of the special tax within the territory to be annexed to the District shall be submitted to the voters of the area to be annexed to the District at an election called therefore as hereinafter provided.

5. This Council hereby finds that fewer than 12 persons have been registered to vote within the territory proposed to be annexed to the District for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the hearing heretofore conducted and concluded by this Council for the purposes of these annexation proceedings. Accordingl y, and pursuant to the Act, this Council finds that for purposes of these proceedings the qualified electors are the landowners within the territory proposed to be annexed to the District and that the vote shall be by said landowners, each having one vote for each acre or portion thereof such landowner owns in the territory proposed to be annexed to the District.

6. Pursuant to the Act, the election shall be conducted by mail ballot under Section 4000 of the California Elections Code. This Council hereby determines that paragraphs (a), (b), (c)(1), and (c)(3) of said Section 4000 are applicable to this election.

7. The Council hereby calls a special election to consider the measure described in the ballot referred to below, which election shall be held on January 18, 2022, in the regular meeting place of this Council, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 1033 5th Street, Clovis, California. This Council hereby further finds that the provision of the Act requiring a minimum of 90 days to elapse before said election is for the protection of voters and that the voters have waived such requirement and the date for the election herein specified is established accordingly.

8. The City Clerk is hereby appointed as the election official to conduct the election and shall cause to be provided to each landowner in the territory to be annexed to the District. The City 148
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.

Clerk shall accept the ballots of the qualified electors received prior to 5:00 o’clock p.m. on January 18, 2022, whether received by mail or by personal delivery.

* * * * *

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on January 18, 2022, by the following vote, to wit.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED: January 18, 2022

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

149
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
150
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.

ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO. 22-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA DECLARING

RESULTS OF SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION, DETERMINING VALIDITY OF

PRIOR PROCEEDINGS, AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF AMENDED NOTICE OF

SPECIAL TAX LIEN

CITY OF CLOVIS
Community Facilities District No. 2004-1
(Police and Fire Services)
Annexation No. 72

WHEREAS, in proceedings heretofore conducted by the Council pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the “Act”), this Council has heretofore adopted a resolution calling a special election of the qualified landowner electors in the territory of land proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Police and Fire Services) (the “CFD”); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the resolution which is hereby incorporated herein by this reference, the special election has been held and the City Clerk has filed a Canvass of Votes Cast in Special Election, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment A; and

WHEREAS, this Council has reviewed the Canvass and hereby approves it.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,

1. The issue presented at the special election was the levy of a special tax within the territory annexed to the CFD, to be levied in accordance with the formula here tofore approved by this Council as described in Resolution No. 21-147, a Resolution of Annexation of Territory to Community Facilities District, authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax and Submitting Levy of Tax to Qualified Electors, adopted January 18, 2022.

2. Pursuant to the Canvass on file with the City Clerk, the issue presented at the special election was approved by the landowners of the territory annexed to the CFD by more than two-thirds (2/3) of the landowners voting at the special election.

3. Pursuant to the voter approval, said annexed territory to the CFD is hereby declared to be fully annexed to and part of the CFD and this Council may levy special taxes therein as heretofore provided in these proceedings.

151
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.

4. It is hereby found that all p rior proceedings and actions taken by this Council pursuant to the CFD and the territory annexed thereto were valid and in conformity with the Act.

Within 15 days of the date hereof, the City Clerk shall execute and cause to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Fresno, an amendment to the Notice of Special Tax Lien as required by Section 3117.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

* * * * *

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on January 18, 2022, by the following vote, to wit.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED: January 18, 2022

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

152
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.

ATTACHMENT A

CITY OF CLOVIS
Community Facilities District No. 2004-1
(Police and Fire Services)
Annexation No. 72

CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULT OF ELECTION

I hereby certify that on this date, I canvassed the returns of the election held on this date, in the territory annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2004 -1 (Police and Fire Services) of the City of Clovis which election is designated as the Special Tax Annexation Election, and the total number of ballots cast in the territory to be annexed a nd the total number of votes cast for and against the measure are as follows and the totals as shown for and against the measure are full, true and correct:

Qualified
Landowner
Votes
Votes
Cast
YES NO
City of Clovis
Community Facilities District No. 2004-1
(Police and Fire Services), Annexation No. 72
Special Tax Annexation Election,
January 18, 2022.

BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the City of Clovis, by and for its Community Facilities District No. 2004 -1 (Police and Fire Services) (the “CFD”), be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory annexed to the CFD pursuant to and as described in Resolution No. 22-___ of the City of Clovis, adopted by its Council on January 18, 2022?

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND this ____ day of 2022.

CITY OF CLOVIS

By:

City Clerk

153
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services Department
DATE: January 10, 2022
SUBJECT: Consider various actions associated with CIP 16-19, the State Route 168 / Enterprise Canal Pedestrian Bridge Project, east of Temperance Avenue and south of Owens Mountain Parkway.

a. Receive and File – Status update on the design of the pedestrian bridge.

b. Consider approval of terminating the pedestrian bridge design contract with Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc.

Staff: Renee Mathis, Planning and Development Services Director / Mike Harrison, City Engineer
Recommendation: Receive and File and Approve
Attachments 1. Vicinity Map

2. Bridge Types, Alignment & Cost Estimates

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None

RECOMMENDATION
For the City Council to consider terminating the design contract with Biggs Cardosa Associates, Inc. (BCA) for the State Route 168 / Enterprise Canal Pedestrian Bridge Project.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In June 2019, the City Council authorized staff to enter into a contract with BCA for design engineering services on a proposed future State Route 168 / Enterprise Canal Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge Project, located east of Temperance Avenue, south of Owens Mountain Parkway (see Attachment 1 vicinity map ). The contract amount with BCA was for approximately $1.2 million and was comprised of federal competitive Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds. The design contract with BCA included two phases of work.

Phase 1 work included development of alternative designs for alignment and bridge type, public outreach, and completion of the environmental approvals that would ultimately lead 154
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
to the selection of a preferred bridge alternative. Phase 2 work included final design of the preferred alternative and completion of the construction documents.

Prior to the selection process for the City’s contract with BCA, staff worked with Caltrans on a preliminary study that indicated the cost of the City’s desired bridge would conservatively be in the range of $7 million. During negotiations with BCA, it was revealed that the cost estimate for a signature bridge structure was likely significantly under -estimated on the previous study. Therefore, the design contract with BCA was set up in 2 phases to allow for concepts to be developed and realistic estimates provided under the initial phase. At that point, decisions could be made to either terminate the preliminary design work or move forward and complete the final design.

To date s taff and BCA have developed four concept bridge options and construction cost estimates for the project as part of the Phase 1 work. The construction cost estimates are significantly higher than originally estimated; estimates range from $10 million to $18 million.

The four bridge types considered include the following with associated construction only costs:

1 – Caltrans standard box Girder Bridge: $10.7 million for construction

2 – 2 Arch Bridge: $15.08 million for construction

3 – 3 Arch Bridge: $15.1 million for construction

4 – Cable Stayed Bridge: $17.5 million for construction

Due to the substantially higher than expected construction estimates , staff has identified three project design options for Council consideration with a preferred staff recommendation. The three options include:

Option 1: Complete all Phase 1 work and then terminate the design contract with BCA. Remaining Phase 1 work includes: meetings with stakeholders, selecting a preferred alignment, selecting a preferred bridge type, and completing environmental approvals. Phase 1 costs to date total $360,000 (contract work and staff time).

Completion of the remaining Phase 1 work will cost an additional $245,000 in contract work plus staff time.

Under Option 1, the City would have to pay back approximately $260,000 in CMAQ funds that have been reimbursed to date. The reason the City would have to pay back the CMAQ funds is that the work identified in the grant, which included both work phases, would not be completed. Instead of the CMAQ funding the City would utilize street maintenance funds to cover all Phase 1 costs including the $360,000 spent to date plus an additional $245,000 in contract work and staff time.

Option 2: Complete all Phase 1 and Phase 2 work and seek additional design funds to finish all associated tasks. Remaining Phase 1 work includes : meetings with stakeholders, selecting a preferred alignment, selecting a preferred bridge type, and 155
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
completing environmental approvals. Phase 2 work includes: completing final design of the selected bridge type and completion of all construction documents.

Under Option 2, the City would need to budget additional funds above the $1.2 million in CMAQ funding currently allocated in order to complete the work. The amount of additional funding needed would depend on the type of bridge structure ultimately selected under the Phase 1 work. It is estimated the additional design funds needed could be upward of approximately $1.8 million given the higher cost bridge types. The source of these additional funds would likely be street maintenance funds.

Option 3: (Preferred Recommendation): Immediately terminate the design contract with BCA. The contract would terminate upon 30 days written notice to BCA.

Under Option 3, the City would pay back $ 260,000 in CMAQ funds that have been reimbursed to date , and would not spend any additional City funds , leaving the remaining Phase 1 work uncompleted. The City would end the contract with BCA with 4 bridge types, photo simulations of the bridge types, and estimated construction costs for each. The City could then use this information to seek other funding opportunities to complete the preliminary and final design, construction documents, and construction contract for the future signature pedestrian bridge.

Given the fiscal hurdles encountered to date with this project, staff is recommending that Council approve Option 3, directing staff to immediately provide written notice to BCA terminating the design contract.

BACKGROUND
In 2015 the City was successful in securing Active Transportation Plan (ATP) funds for the completion of a Project Study Report -Project Development Support (PSR -PDS) document that determined the need, feasibility and future development of the Enterprise Canal trail bridge crossing over State Route 168 (See Figure 1). The PSR -PDS report demonstrated that a future bridge in the area would provide a beneficial missing link for the City’s Class 1 Enterprise Canal Trail system, by providing seamless continuity over State Route 168. The future bridge would also provide a direct link for the commercial, residential, mixed use and business campuses both north and south of State Route 168.

Currently the Enterprise Canal Trail terminates north of Owens Mountain Parkway, where bicyclists and pedestrians are routed to Temperance Avenue. Trail users who wish to continue to the portion of the Enterprise Canal bank and future trail that lies sout h of the freeway must make their way to Temperance Avenue where they would cross under State Route 168 utilizing existing sidewalks and bicycle lanes.

156
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Figure 1

Based on study findings and cost estimates obtained while preparing the PSR-PDS, the City was successful in securing a $1.2 million federal CMAQ grant for the design of the project.

These funds were intended to develop alternatives for the bridge alignment, type, environmental reviews, and estimated costs that would then be used to sele ct a preferred alternative for final design and preparation of construction documents. The CMAQ funds were not intended for project bidding or construction.

The final PSR-PSD report indicated that the estimated design and construction cost for the bridge project would be approximately $10.5 million dollars . At that time, t he estimated construction cost of a signature pedestrian bridge type was approximately $6.5 million dollars. A signature bridge is considered a unique bridge type with distinguishing aspe cts that can serve as a landmark. The remaining $4 million dollars was estimated for design, construction management and right-of-way.

In developing this estimate , staff reached out to consultants that had experience with pedestrian bridge design and bridge costs. The consultants contacted included the Oregon Bridge Engineering Company (OBEC) and BCA. OBEC provided various cost estimates for signature bridge types. The costs ranged from $1.3 million to $3.2 million. At that time (prior to the City’s cont ract with BCA) , BCA assisted staff in providing a cost estimate for a signature bridge type in the amount of $7 million. With the completion of the study report, staff was encouraged by the conclusions therein and therefore proceeded with competing for grant funds to commence the design development stage of the bridge project. Even though the roughly $7 million estimated construction cost was much higher than anticipated when the project was originally conceived, staff felt that the research that went into deriving 157
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
the estimate was adequate and felt comfortable that it would cover the cost . It was acknowledged that securing construction funding for the project would be a challenge , but attainable.

In June 2019, the Council authorized a contract for design engineering services to BCA for the State Route 168 / Enterprise Canal Pedestrian Bridge Project in the amount of $1.2 million dollars. During negotiations of the contract, BCA stated the City’s cost estimates were low for the type of signature bridge design that was desired (example arch and cable stayed spans) due to various complexities and constraints that were not known during the preliminary study. As is typical in the industry, BCA correlated the cost of the design to the estimated bridge cost referenced in the PSR-PSD report, so the cost of the design would go up if the estimated cost of the construction went up compared to the original estimate. Since part of the design process was to determine the brid ge type and alignment before moving into the final design of the bridge, staff structured the design development contract with BCA in two phases of work as follows:

Phase 1 – Preliminary Design $431,800

Phase 2 – Final Design / Construction Documents $776,200

Phase 1 work included development of alternative designs for alignment and bridge type , public outreach, and completion of the environmental approvals , ultimately leading to the selection of a preferred alternative. Phase 2 work included the final design of the preferred alternative and completion of the construction documents. The contract was structured in this way in order to provide the ability for decisions to be made regarding whether to proceed with the final design and, if so, the type of structure to design.

The current contract amount with BCA is based on a bridge alternative that can be constructed for an assumed $7. 4 million dollars. If the selected bridge alternative is more complex, resulting in a higher cost to construct, the contract amount with BCA would need to be amended accordingly. Knowing this, but not knowing the magnitude of the added cost, staff and Council proceeded with the 2-phased contract to provide an opportunity to make a decision on whether or not to proceed with the project if the obstacles and cost were found to be too much at the completion of the Phase 1 work . Currently, Phase 1 work is approximately 45% complete. Project expenditures to date total $360,000 (BCA contract expenses and staff time).

As part of the Phase 1 work, BCA worked with staff to identify four bridge types with a recommended alignment along with estimated construction costs of each. BCA provided the City with photo -simulations and estimates of the four bridge types. The bridge type s, alignment and cost estimates are included in Attachment 2 of this report. Some of the criteria considered when evaluating the bridge types included consideration of the context. The bridge is located between and connecting the hospital campus with the Research and Technology (RT) Business Park . Therefore, the RT Park Design Guidelines, construction costs, aesthetics, and right-of-way impact are all considerations. The general theme of the RT Business Park Design Guidelines is to produce a visually clean and “edgy” form reflective 158
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
of the clean technological businesses within the area. While a preferred bridge type has not been selected, staff believes the bridge options presented provide the de sired signature structure consistent with the context and RT Park Design Guidance.

Remaining items of work under Phase 1 include public outreach, meetings with stakeholders, preparation of preliminary engineering plans, and the completion of California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA) environmental documents. Phase 2 work entails completing the final design of the preferred alternative and completion of the construction documents.

The four bridge types include the following:

1-Caltrans standard box Girder Bridge: $10.7 million for construction

2-2 Arch Bridge: $15.08 million for construction

3-3 Arch Bridge: $15.1 million for construction

159
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

4-Cable Stayed Bridge: $17.5 million for construction

Based on the above construction estimates, project administration costs (such as staff time, additional design costs, and construction management time) will add an additional approximately 15% to 25%, resulting in a potential total project cost ranging from $13 million to $22 million.

Also, for any non-standard bridge types, such as the arch and cable stayed bridges, Caltrans has indicated that the maintenance responsibility would lie with the City. This would likely take the form of a maintenance agreement whereby Caltrans performs the actual maintenance using its crews or contractors, and the City would pay those an nual costs to Caltrans. The magnitude of those annual costs would depend on the final bridge type constructed.

The four bridge types identified above have yet to be vetted through the public review process, which is part of the remaining items of work un der Phase 1 of the design development contract.

PROJECT FUNDING
160
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

The design contract with BCA was budgeted in the 2021-2022 fiscal year budget through a CMAQ grant totaling $1.2 million. The City is using its formula based CMAQ funds to meet the grant match requirement of 11.47%.

Under Option 1: the City would complete all Phase 1 work and then terminate the design contract with BCA. To date the City has spent a total of $360,000 on contract work including staff time. The City has received a reimbur sement of $260,000 in CMAQ funds to date for Phase 1 work. Completion of the remaining Phase 1 work will cost an additional $ 245,000 plus staff time. Under this option the City would be required to pay back the $ 260,000 in CMAQ funds received to date. The reason the City would have to pay back the CMAQ funds reimbursed to date is that the work identified in the grant, which included both work phases, would not be completed. The City would utilize street maintenance funds to cover all Phase 1 costs, $360,000 spent to date plus $245,000 in remaining contract costs plus staff time.

Under Option 2: the City would complete all Phase 1 and Phase 2 work and seek additional design funds to finish all associated tasks. Under Option 2, the City would need to bu dget additional funds above the $1.2 million in CMAQ funding currently allocated in order to complete the work. The amount of additional funding needed would depend on the type of bridge structure ultimately selected under the Phase 1 work. As a gauge, if the City were to proceed with the highest bridge cost option (cable stayed structure), the additional design cost would increase to approximately 13-16% of the estimated construction cost for an additional design cost of approximately $1.8 million. Funding that would otherwise be used for street maintenance would be needed to finish the bridge design. The amount of the funding needed would directly affec t the amount of street maintenance projects the City would be able to deliver in the future.

If the City opted to complete all Phase 1 and 2 work, and then does not move to the next project phase (construction) within 10 years of the design funding alloc ation date, the City would be subject to paying back all federal CMAQ funds received. The design funding for this project was allocated in 2017, therefore the 10 -year term to commence construction would be 2027.

Under Option 3: (Preferred Recommendation): the City would immediately terminate the design contract with BCA. The contract would terminate upon 30 days written notice to BCA.

Under Option 3, the City would pay back $ 260,000 in CMAQ funds that have been reimbursed to date and would not spend any additional City funds , leaving the remaining Phase 1 work uncompleted. The costs spent to date on the Phase 1 work, approximately $360,000 (contract work including staff time ), would be covered with street maintenance funds.

Under Option 3 the City would end the contract with BCA with 4 bridge types, photo simulations of the bridge types, and estimated construction costs for each. The City could use this information to seek other funding opportunities to complete the preliminary and final design, construc tion documents, and construction contract for the future signature pedestrian bridge.

161
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Putting together funding for the construction of the bridge w ill continue to be an extreme challenge. Staff has been and continues to research available construction funding options.

Construction funding will most likely require a combination of sources due to the magnitude of the estimated cost. Staff has reached out to other agencies who have constructed pedestrian bridges in their jurisdictions. The jurisdictions contacted indicated that construction funding sources included local funds, various grants, and even corporate donations. Grant funding awards can be limited and would need other sources of funding to at least cover any match requirements. Match requirements can be up to fifty percent (50%) of the project cost. Higher match commitments make projects more competitive.

One potential construction funding source is grants issued by the State of California Active Transportation Program. These funds are extremely competitive. There is no match required, but to remain competitive the project would have to show leveraging of funds. Staff is also looking into any opportunities with the newly approved federal infrastructure bill. It is clear that cobbling together funding for a project of this magnitude would be an uphill battle, especially with no local funding currently identified for a match.

With the total project cost being 2 to 3 times what was anticipated at the completion of the PSR-PSD report, and the challenges associated with securing construction funding needed to successfully and timely complete the project, staff is recommending the immedia te termination of the design development contract with BCA.

FISCAL IMPACT
Under Option 1 and 3, the City would pay back $ 260,000 in CMAQ funds that have been reimbursed to date. This represents contract work and staff time submitted with the first CMAQ billing. A total of $360,000 has been spent to date (including the CMAQ billing). Street maintenance funds would be used to cover these costs.

In order to complete all Phase 1 work, local street maintenance funds would also be utilized to cover the remaining costs $245,000 plus staff time.

Under Option 2 the City would need to budget additional funds above the $1.2 million in CMAQ funding currently allocated in order to complete the work. The amount of additional funding needed would depend on the type of bridge structure ultimately selected under the Phase 1 work . It is estimated the additional design funds needed could be upward of approximately $ 1.8 million. The source of these additional funds would be street maintenance funds.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
Staff does not recommend allocating up to an additional $1.8 million in street maintenance funds to cover costs associated with all Phase 1 and Phase 2 design development work when street maintenance needs are so great. Staff instead recommends preserving these funds for street improvement projects.

In addition, with the complexity and uncertainty involved in securing final design and construction funding for the pedestrian bridge, the City could be in a posit ion of having to 162
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
pay back the $1.2 million in federal CMAQ funding expended on the design if the City is not able to commence construction of the bridge by 2027.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL

1. Staff will Receive and File the status update on the design of the pedestrian bridge.

2. Staff will immediately provide written notice terminating the design contract with BCA.

Prepared by: John Armendariz, Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: City Manager JH
163
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
ðWðIðLðLðOðW
ðPðEðAðCðH
ðCðLðOðVðIðS
ðSðUðNðNðYðSðIðDðE
ðFðOðWðLðEðR
ðAðRðMðSðTðRðOðNðG
ðTðEðMðPðEðRðAðNðCðE
ðLðOðCðAðN
ðDðEð ðWðOðLðF
ðSðHðEðPðHðEðRðD
ðTðEðAðGðUðE
ðNðEðEðS
ðAðLðLðUðVðIðAðL
ðHðEðRðNðDðOðN
ðSðIðEðRðRðA
ðBðUðLðLðAðRðD
ðBðAðRðSðTðOðW
ðSðHðAðW
ðGðEðTðTðYðSðBðUðRðG
ðAðSðHðLðAðN
ðDðAðKðOðTðA
ðLðEðOðNðAðRðD
ðHðIðGðHðLðAðNðD
ðMðIðNðNðEðWðAðWðA
ðPðeðdðeðsðtðrðiðaðn
ðBðrðiðdðgðeð ðLðoðcðaðtðiðoðn
4 ð1ð"ð ð=ð ð8ð0ð0ð0ð'
ðAðTðTðAðCðHðMðEðNðTð 1
ðCðIðTðYð ðLðIðMðIðTðS ðSðPðHðEðRðEð ðOðFð ðIðNðFðLðUðEðNðCðE ðVðIðCðIðNðIðTðYð ðMðAðP
ðCðIðPð ð1ð6ð-ð1ð9ð ð-ð ðSðtðaðtðeð ðRðoðuðtðeð ð1ð6ð8ð/ðEðnðtðeðrðpðrðiðsðeð ðCðaðnðaðlð ðPðeðdðeðsðtðrðiðaðnð ðBðrðiðdðgðeð ðPðrðoðjðeðcðt ðMðAðYð ð3ð1ð,ð ð2ð0ð1ð9 164
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

ENTERPRISE CANAL CLASS I

TRAIL / SIGNATURE PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE OVER SR 168
City Of Clovis
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
165
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

RECORD DRAWINGRESIDENT ENGINEERDATEDESIGNED:DRAWN:CHECKED:DATEP. BRADBURYS. VANGG. GROSS02/24/2002/24/2002/24/20

PROFILE

PLANTYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
Ret Wall No. 1
Ret Wall No. 2
3-SPAN SIGNATURE BRIDGE, L = 460'
APPROACH BRIDGE, L = 305'

RET WALL,
L = 100'
CONFORM, L = 181'
71+19.08

START PROJECT

EMBANKMENT,
L = 430'
88+12.71

END PROJECT

APPROACH

BRIDGE,
L = 218'

PROPOSED

HOSPITAL

SIDEWALK
14'
42" WATER MAIN
MINIMUM CLEARANCE = 14'
166
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

RECORD DRAWINGRESIDENT ENGINEERDATEDESIGNED:DRAWN:CHECKED:DATEP. BRADBURYS. VANGG. GROSS02/24/2002/24/2002/24/20

PROFILE

PLANTYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
2-SPAN SIGNATURE BRIDGE, L = 460'
96+76.46

END PROJECT

EMBANKMENT,
L = 418'

APPROACH BRIDGE,
L = 305'
APPROACH BRIDGE, L = 193'

RET WALL,
L = 150'

CONFORM,
L = 150'
80+00.00

START PROJECT
Ret Wall No. 1
Ret Wall No. 2
42" WATER MAIN
MINIMUM CLEARANCE = 14'
14'
Submitted alternatives 4 options 3A and 3B
advanced package to the City on 5/18/20.

City preliminary comments received on 5/21/20 and
6/1/20
Submitted revised alternatives 4 options 3A and 3B
package to the City on 6/15/20.

City comments received on 6/30/20 and 7/2/20
Submitted revised draft memo for options 3A and 3B
exhibits, photo-simulations, cost estimates and
narrative on 8/14/20.

Submitted estimated construction cost for Sierra
Gateway Trail (SGT) and park concept on 8/25/20.

City comments on revised package received on
9/30/20.
167
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

CONCRETE BOX GIRDER BRIDGE
168
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
e GENERAL PLAN ESTIMATE X ADVANCE PLANNING ESTIMATE Revised - December 3, 2007
RCVD BY: I N EST :

OUT ES T:

BRIDGE: POC over SR-168 BR. No.: DISTRICT: 6
TYPE: Caltr ans CI P/PS Box Gir der RTE: 168
CU: CO:

EA: PM :

LENGTH: WIDTH: AREA (SF)=
DESIGN SECTION:
# OF STRUCTURES IN PROJECT : EST . NO.

PRICES BY : COST INDEX:

PRICES CHECKED BY : DATE:

QUANTITIES BY: DATE:

CONTRACT ITEMS TYPE UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT
1 SIGNATURE CALTRANS MINIMUM BRIDGE L=460', W=18'SQFT 8,280 $350.00 $2,898,000.00 2 SIGNATURE BRIDGE AESTHETICS (5%) SQFT 8,280
3 APPROACH BRIDGE (EAST) L=305', W=18'SQFT 5,490 $315.00 $1,729,350.00 4 APPROACH BRIDGE (EAST) AESTHETICS (10%)SQFT 5,490
5 APPROACH BRIDGE (WEST) L=218', W=18'SQFT 3,924 $315.00 $1,236,060.00 6 APPROACH BRIDGE (WEST) AESTHETICS (10%)SQFT 3,924
7 8 RETAINING WALL NO.1 L=100', H=5.5'SQFT 550 $150.00 $82,500.00 9 RETAINING WALL NO.2 L=100', H=5.5'SQFT 550 $150.00 $82,500.00 10 11 WEST EMBANKMENT L = 430' LF 430 $550.00 $236,500.00 12 13 CIVIL TRAIL WORK (181'+100'+430')L=711', W=14'SQFT 9,954 $25.00 $248,850.00 14 15 TRAIL LIGHTING LS 1 $300,000.00$300,000.00
16 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT LS 1 $100,000.00$100,000.00
17 LANDSCAPE LS 1 $200,000.00$200,000.00
18 19 HOSPI TA L SI DEWA L K LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 20 21 DEMOLITION/ CLEAR AND GRUB LS 1 $100,000.00$100,000.00 22 23 FENCING (430'+430') L = 860' LF 860 $150.00 $129,000.00 24 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $200,000.00$200,000.00
25 26
27 28
29 30
SUBTOTAL $7,592,760
ROUTING MOBILIZATION ( @ 10 % ) $843,640

1. DES SECTI ON PROJECT SUBTOTAL ITEMS $8,436,400

2. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - NORTH CONTINGENCIES (@ 25%) $2,109,100

3. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - CENTRAL PROJECT TOTAL COST $10,545,500

4. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - SOUTH COST PER SQ. FOOT

5. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - WEST

6. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAWORK BY UTILITY FORCES $100,000 GRAND TOTAL $10,645,500
COMMENTS: Costs indicated are f or structure, civil work, electricalBUDGET ESTIMATE AS OF $10,646,000 and landscape items of work only.

Costs f or right of way acquisition, city overhead,
permits, other agency review f ees, construction
management, specialty inspection,
engineering (PS& E), etc. not included.Escalated Budget Estimate to M idpoint of Constr uction * Escal ati on Rate per Y ear 3.0%
Y ears BeyondEscal ated Y ears BeyondEscal ated
Midpoint Budget Est. Midpoint Budget Est.
1 $10,965,000 4 $11,982,0002 $11,294,000 5 $12,341,0003 $11,633,000 * Escalated budget estimate is provided for information only, actual construction costs may vary. Escalated budget estimates provided do not replace Departmental policy to update cost estimates annually. 169 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

TWIN TIED ARCH BRIDGE
170
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
e GENERAL PLAN ESTIMATE X ADVANCE PLANNING ESTIMATE Revised - December 3, 2007
RCVD BY: I N EST :

OUT ES T:

BRIDGE: POC over SR-168 BR. No.: DISTRICT: 6
TYPE: 2-Span Tied-Arch Signature Bridge RTE: 168
CU: CO:

EA: PM :

LENGTH: WIDTH: AREA (SF)=
DESIGN SECTION:
# OF STRUCTURES IN PROJECT : EST . NO.

PRICES BY : COST INDEX:

PRICES CHECKED BY : DATE:

QUANTITIES BY: DATE:

CONTRACT ITEMS TYPE UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT
1 SIGNATURE BRIDGE L=460', W=18'SQFT 8,280 $665.00 $5,506,200.00 2 SIGNATURE BRIDGE AESTHETICS (5%) SQFT 8,280 $35.00 $289,800.00 3 APPROACH BRIDGE (EAST) L=193', W=18'SQFT 3,474 $315.00 $1,094,310.00 4 APPROACH BRIDGE (EAST) AESTHETICS (10%)SQFT 3,474 $35.00 $121,590.00 5 APPROACH BRIDGE (WEST) L=305', W=18'SQFT 5,490 $315.00 $1,729,350.00 6 APPROACH BRIDGE (WEST) AESTHETICS (10%)SQFT 5,490 $35.00 $192,150.00 7 8 RETAINING WALL NO.1 L=150', H=6.5'SQFT 975 $150.00 $146,250.00 9 RETAINING WALL NO.2 L=150', H=6.5'SQFT 975 $150.00 $146,250.00 10 11 WEST EMBANKMENT L = 418' LF 418 $550.00 $229,900.00 1213 CIVIL TRAIL WORK (150'+150'+418')L=718', W=14'SQFT 10,052 $25.00 $251,300.00 14 15 TRAIL LIGHTING LS 1 $300,000.00$300,000.00
16 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT LS 1 $100,000.00$100,000.00
17 LANDSCAPE LS 1 $200,000.00$200,000.00
18 19 HOSPI TA L SI DEWA L K LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 20 21 DEMOLITION/ CLEAR AND GRUB LS 1 $100,000.00$100,000.00 22 23 FENCING (418'+418') L = 836' LF 836 $150.00 $125,400.00 24 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $200,000.00$200,000.00
25 26
27 28
29 30
SUBTOTAL $10,782,500
ROUTING MOBILIZATION ( @ 10 % ) $1,198,056

1. DES SECTI ON PROJECT SUBTOTAL ITEMS $11,980,556

2. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - NORTH CONTINGENCIES (@ 25%) $2,995,139

3. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - CENTRAL PROJECT TOTAL COST $14,975,694

4. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - SOUTH COST PER SQ. FOOT

5. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - WEST

6. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAWORK BY UTILITY FORCES $100,000 GRAND TOTAL $15,075,694
COMMENTS: Costs indicated are f or structure, civil work, electricalBUDGET ESTIMATE AS OF $15,076,000 and landscape items of work only.

Costs f or right of way acquisition, city overhead,
permits, other agency review f ees, construction
management, specialty inspection,
engineering (PS& E), etc. not included.

Escalated Budget Estimate to M idpoint of Constr uction * Escal ati on Rate per Y ear 3.0%
Y ears BeyondEscal ated Y ears BeyondEscal ated
Midpoint Budget Est. Midpoint Budget Est.
1 $15,528,000 4 $16,968,0002 $15,994,000 5 $17,477,0003 $16,474,000 * Escalated budget estimate is provided for information only, actual construction costs may vary. Escalated budget estimates provided do not replace Departmental policy to update cost estimates annually. (Option B) 171
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

TRIPLE TIED ARCH BRIDGE
172
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
e GENERAL PLAN ESTIMATE X ADVANCE PLANNING ESTIMATE Revised - December 3, 2007
RCVD BY: I N EST :

OUT ES T:

BRIDGE: POC over SR-168 BR. No.: DISTRICT: 6
TYPE: 3-Span Tied-Arch Signature Bridge RTE: 168
CU: CO:

EA: PM :

LENGTH: WIDTH: AREA (SF)=
DESIGN SECTION:
# OF STRUCTURES IN PROJECT : EST . NO.

PRICES BY : COST INDEX:

PRICES CHECKED BY : DATE:

QUANTITIES BY: DATE:

CONTRACT ITEMS TYPE UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT
1 SIGNATURE BRIDGE L=460', W=18'SQFT 8,280 $665.00 $5,506,200.00 2 SIGNATURE BRIDGE AESTHETICS (5%) SQFT 8,280 $35.00 $289,800.00 3 APPROACH BRIDGE (EAST) L=305', W=18'SQFT 5,490 $315.00 $1,729,350.00 4 APPROACH BRIDGE (EAST) AESTHETICS (10%)SQFT 5,490 $35.00 $192,150.00 5 APPROACH BRIDGE (WEST) L=218', W=18'SQFT 3,924 $315.00 $1,236,060.00 6 APPROACH BRIDGE (WEST) AESTHETICS (10%)SQFT 3,924 $35.00 $137,340.00 7 8 RETAINING WALL NO.1 L=100', H=5.5'SQFT 550 $150.00 $82,500.00 9 RETAINING WALL NO.2 L=100', H=5.5'SQFT 550 $150.00 $82,500.00 10 11 WEST EMBANKMENT L = 430' LF 430 $550.00 $236,500.00 12 13 CIVIL TRAIL WORK (181'+100'+430')L=711', W=14'SQFT 9,954 $25.00 $248,850.00 14 15 TRAIL LIGHTING LS 1 $300,000.00$300,000.00
16 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT LS 1 $100,000.00$100,000.00
17 LANDSCAPE LS 1 $200,000.00$200,000.00
18 19 HOSPI TA L SI DEWA L K LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 20 21 DEMOLITION/ CLEAR AND GRUB LS 1 $100,000.00$100,000.00 22 23 FENCING (430'+430') L = 860' LF 860 $150.00 $129,000.00 24 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $200,000.00$200,000.00
25 26
27 28
29 30
SUBTOTAL $10,820,250
ROUTING MOBILIZATION ( @ 10 % ) $1,202,250

1. DES SECTI ON PROJECT SUBTOTAL ITEMS $12,022,500

2. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - NORTH CONTINGENCIES (@ 25%) $3,005,625

3. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - CENTRAL PROJECT TOTAL COST $15,028,125

4. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - SOUTH COST PER SQ. FOOT

5. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - WEST

6. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAWORK BY UTILITY FORCES $100,000 GRAND TOTAL $15,128,125
COMMENTS: Costs indicated are f or structure, civil work, electricalBUDGET ESTIMATE AS OF $15,128,000 and landscape items of work only.

Costs f or right of way acquisition, city overhead,
permits, other agency review f ees, construction
management, specialty inspection,
engineering (PS& E), etc. not included.Escalated Budget Estimate to M idpoint of Constr uction * Escal ati on Rate per Y ear 3.0%
Y ears BeyondEscal ated Y ears BeyondEscal ated
Midpoint Budget Est. Midpoint Budget Est.
1 $15,582,000 4 $17,026,0002 $16,049,000 5 $17,537,0003 $16,530,000 * Escalated budget estimate is provided for information only, actual construction costs may vary. Escalated budget estimates provided do not replace Departmental policy to update cost estimates annually. 173 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

TWIN TOWER CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE
174
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
e GENERAL PLAN ESTIMATE X ADVANCE PLANNING ESTIMATE Revised - December 3, 2007
RCVD BY: I N EST :

OUT ES T:

BRIDGE: POC over SR-168 BR. No.: DISTRICT: 6
TYPE: 3-Span Cable-Stayed Signatur e Br idge RTE: 168
CU: CO:

EA: PM :

LENGTH: WIDTH: AREA (SF)=
DESIGN SECTION:
# OF STRUCTURES IN PROJECT : EST . NO.

PRICES BY : COST INDEX:

PRICES CHECKED BY : DATE:

QUANTITIES BY: DATE:

CONTRACT ITEMS TYPE UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT
1 SIGNATURE BRIDGE L=460', W=18'SQFT 8,280 $855.00 $7,079,400.00 2 SIGNATURE BRIDGE AESTHETICS (5%) SQFT 8,280 $45.00 $372,600.00 3 APPROACH BRIDGE (EAST) L=305', W=18'SQFT 5,490 $315.00 $1,729,350.00 4 APPROACH BRIDGE (EAST) AESTHETICS (10%)SQFT 5,490 $35.00 $192,150.00 5 APPROACH BRIDGE (WEST) L=218', W=18'SQFT 3,924 $315.00 $1,236,060.00 6 APPROACH BRIDGE (WEST) AESTHETICS (10%)SQFT 3,924 $35.00 $137,340.00 7 8 RETAINING WALL NO.1 L=100', H=5.5'SQFT 550 $150.00 $82,500.00 9 RETAINING WALL NO.2 L=100', H=5.5'SQFT 550 $150.00 $82,500.00 10 11 WEST EMBANKMENT L = 430' LF 430 $550.00 $236,500.00 12 13 CIVIL TRAIL WORK (181'+100'+430')L=711', W=14'SQFT 9,954 $25.00 $248,850.00 14 15 TRAIL LIGHTING LS 1 $300,000.00$300,000.00
16 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT LS 1 $100,000.00$100,000.00
17 LANDSCAPE LS 1 $200,000.00$200,000.00
18 19 HOSPI TA L SI DEWA L K LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 20 21 DEMOLITION/ CLEAR AND GRUB LS 1 $100,000.00$100,000.00 22 23 FENCING (430'+430') L = 860' LF 860 $150.00 $129,000.00 24 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $200,000.00$200,000.00
25 26
27 28
29 30
SUBTOTAL $12,476,250
ROUTING MOBILIZATION ( @ 10 % ) $1,386,250

1. DES SECTI ON PROJECT SUBTOTAL ITEMS $13,862,500

2. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - NORTH CONTINGENCIES (@ 25%) $3,465,625

3. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - CENTRAL PROJECT TOTAL COST $17,328,125

4. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - SOUTH COST PER SQ. FOOT

5. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN - WEST

6. OFFICE OF BRIDGE DESIGN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAWORK BY UTILITY FORCES $100,000 GRAND TOTAL $17,428,125
COMMENTS: Costs indicated are f or structure, civil work, electricalBUDGET ESTIMATE AS OF $17,428,000 and landscape items of work only.

Costs f or right of way acquisition, city overhead,
permits, other agency review f ees, construction
management, specialty inspection,
engineering (PS& E), etc. not included.Escalated Budget Estimate to M idpoint of Constr uction * Escal ati on Rate per Y ear 3.0%
Y ears BeyondEscal ated Y ears BeyondEscal ated
Midpoint Budget Est. Midpoint Budget Est.
1 $17,951,000 4 $19,616,0002 $18,490,000 5 $20,204,0003 $19,045,000 * Escalated budget estimate is provided for information only, actual construction costs may vary. Escalated budget estimates provided do not replace Departmental policy to update cost estimates annually. 175 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

← All documents from this meeting