Agenda packet — Clovis City Council, August 1, 2022 (part 2 of 3)

Herndon Ave
Chestnut Ave
Eastbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Chestnut Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
271
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 5
PM Peak Total 0 7 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 2
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Chestnut Ave @ Herndon Ave 36.8376
Fresno -119.7362
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Chestnut Ave
Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
Chestnut Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
272
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME 136 Seconds CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Chestnut Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Chestnut Ave
Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends

273
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 39 86 2 2 9 21 156 20 14 4 20 131 24 18 5 9 221 24 18 10 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 74 107 13 6 7 28 110 24 16 3 32 155 48 38 3 18 300 25 19 7 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 113 141 10 6 4 41 180 38 11 3 22 216 69 51 4 8 398 31 20 1 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 120 133 6 3 4 35 178 35 19 5 25 266 78 45 3 26 421 25 6 8 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 89 125 16 10 9 35 150 21 8 5 23 234 58 34 6 15 313 25 13 10 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 83 110 10 8 5 34 142 34 20 4 40 213 42 34 7 11 374 38 16 6 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 67 122 9 9 10 27 114 32 17 4 31 136 47 27 1 20 291 28 7 10 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 58 117 14 11 4 31 97 28 18 4 33 183 41 26 5 25 322 40 5 6 TOTAL 643 941 80 55 52 252 1127 232 123 32 226 1534 407 273 34 132 2640 236 104 58 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 61 190 26 12 2 20 117 41 26 3 78 342 92 28 6 41 233 47 32 4 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 66 227 25 13 3 55 160 34 18 5 83 353 85 28 2 40 257 62 39 1 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 70 207 26 10 1 39 168 47 22 4 79 310 107 32 2 42 255 50 21 4 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 72 196 29 12 2 39 148 39 25 2 80 383 101 28 4 41 222 53 25 5 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 80 261 29 5 3 37 177 47 29 1 70 358 103 18 5 38 232 45 30 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 72 245 35 9 1 45 147 50 32 1 98 471 125 25 2 38 266 53 18 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 80 235 13 2 0 51 158 45 31 0 80 347 82 23 0 36 225 57 36 2 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 62 212 28 3 1 57 168 38 23 1 58 272 82 22 0 29 222 57 44 1 TOTAL 563 1773 211 66 13 343 1243 341 206 17 626 2836 777 204 21 305 1912 424 245 18 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 405 509 42 27 22 145 650 128 58 17 110 929 247 164 20 60 1506 119 55 25 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 304 937 106 28 6 172 630 181 117 4 328 1559 411 94 11 153 945 208 109 8 PHF Trucks
AM 0.899 1.7% PM 117 181 630 172 0.942
PM 0.902 0.5%
PM AM
AM 58 128 650 145 0.891
AM PM

0.828 0.871 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 55 109
328 110 119 208
1559 929 1506 945
411 247 60 153
94 164 (RTOR) PHF 0.892 0.915

PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.905 405 509 42 27
PM 0.91 304 937 106 28

Page 1 of 3 ends

Herndon Ave
Willow Ave
Eastbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Willow Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear

36.8375
-119.7296
Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Herndon Ave
Willow Ave
274
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 3
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 1 PM 0 0 0 1
PM Peak Total 0 6 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 1
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 5
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Willow Ave
Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
Willow Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Willow Ave @ Herndon Ave 36.8375
Fresno -119.7296
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
275
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All appoaches have protected left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends

150 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
Willow Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Willow Ave
276
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 158 0 0 3 0 283 2 0 8 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 189 0 0 3 0 340 15 0 5 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 237 0 0 3 0 431 12 1 6 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 2 2 332 0 0 5 0 460 14 1 4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 279 0 0 6 0 357 20 0 8 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 2 230 0 0 9 0 412 13 0 10 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 2 201 0 0 5 0 331 19 0 10 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 0 4 223 0 0 5 0 364 35 1 5 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 20 2 19 1849 0 0 39 0 2978 130 3 56 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 8 0 5 397 0 0 3 0 286 37 0 4 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 14 1 9 422 0 0 6 0 305 44 1 5 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 5 0 10 367 0 0 3 0 319 54 0 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 5 2 8 459 0 0 2 0 314 50 7 3 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 4 0 5 425 0 0 2 0 308 62 1 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 9 0 8 521 0 0 2 0 312 52 0 2 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 3 0 11 406 0 0 2 0 305 36 1 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 6 0 4 370 0 0 0 0 267 60 1 1 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 208 54 3 60 3367 0 0 20 0 2416 395 11 17 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 11 2 7 1078 0 0 23 0 1660 59 2 28 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 23 2 31 1772 0 0 9 0 1253 218 8 6 PHF Trucks
AM 0.866 1.9% PM 23 101 0 0 0.935
PM 0.921 0.5%
PM AM
AM 11 13 0 0 0.65
AM PM

0.852 0.812 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 2 8
31 7 59 218
1772 1078 1660 1253
0 0 0 0
0 0 (RTOR) PHF 0.907 0.986

PHF (RTOR)
AM ##### 0 0 0 0
PM ##### 0 0 0 0
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Herndon Ave
Helm Ave

36.8375
-119.7249
Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Herndon Ave
Eastbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Helm Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
277
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 1 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 1 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
1 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
1 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Helm Ave @ Herndon Ave 36.8375
Fresno -119.7249
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Helm Ave
Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
0

Page 2 of 3 ends

Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
278
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME 191 Seconds CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Helm Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Helm Ave
Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS Eastbound left turns are protected.

Page 3 of 3 ends

279
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 2 5 6 6 0 31 5 11 9 0 8 154 0 0 3 1 269 16 1 9 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 14 22 6 5 0 28 17 22 12 0 19 167 4 1 3 5 321 31 1 9 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 6 30 4 3 0 37 29 17 10 0 22 192 11 5 2 7 424 24 0 3 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 7 23 8 5 0 39 38 21 16 1 28 301 9 5 5 7 451 26 2 7 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 7 9 4 4 0 31 22 11 5 1 22 242 16 3 8 5 371 33 7 10 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 4 14 3 2 1 34 19 24 17 1 14 204 13 7 6 5 382 35 13 16 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 6 12 2 2 0 37 12 15 13 4 8 188 5 0 6 1 339 20 0 8 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 6 10 2 2 0 27 18 12 4 0 24 190 10 4 5 3 371 30 2 10 TOTAL 52 125 35 29 1 264 160 133 86 7 145 1638 68 25 38 34 2928 215 26 72 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 1 23 5 2 0 53 34 16 7 2 18 361 12 7 2 3 314 26 7 3 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 6 10 8 8 0 55 38 25 15 3 18 399 14 8 7 7 332 38 11 4 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 7 30 10 7 1 60 25 29 15 0 17 341 18 2 3 4 318 27 12 3 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 11 16 4 3 0 73 29 24 20 3 19 391 20 6 2 4 325 40 19 3 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 10 24 8 5 1 60 35 23 12 2 26 385 19 5 3 11 335 40 13 2 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 8 17 9 7 0 59 38 18 12 0 27 466 28 14 2 9 341 38 10 3 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 8 18 7 4 0 86 26 15 10 1 21 367 20 9 1 2 326 24 7 3 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 9 20 10 8 0 66 34 14 14 3 16 335 25 14 0 7 287 44 11 1 TOTAL 60 158 61 44 2 512 259 164 105 14 162 3045 156 65 20 47 2578 277 90 22 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 24 76 19 14 1 141 108 73 48 3 86 939 49 20 21 24 1628 118 22 36 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 37 75 28 19 1 278 128 80 54 6 93 1609 87 34 8 26 1327 142 49 11 PHF Trucks
AM 0.857 1.9% PM 54 80 128 278 0.957
PM 0.924 0.7%
PM AM
AM 48 73 108 141 0.821
AM PM

0.858 0.794 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 22 49
93 86 118 142
1609 939 1628 1327
87 49 24 26
34 20 (RTOR) PHF 0.914 0.963

PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.744 24 76 19 14
PM 0.833 37 75 28 19
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Herndon Ave
Peach Ave

36.8375
-119.7202
Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Herndon Ave
Peach Ave
Eastbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Peach Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
280
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 1 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 1 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
1 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 1 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Peach Ave @ Herndon Ave 36.8375
Fresno -119.7202
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Peach Ave
Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
Peach Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
281
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME 123 Seconds CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Peach Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Peach Ave
Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends

282
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Avenue
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 182 2 3 1 286 0 7
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 203 1 2 5 352 0 10
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 233 1 3 10 453 0 3
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 348 5 6 12 483 0 8
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 279 1 6 7 416 0 14
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 244 0 8 3 416 0 11
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 228 0 7 6 357 0 10
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 214 7 5 3 409 0 10
TOTAL 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1931 17 40 47 3172 0 73
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 426 6 4 9 342 0 4
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 454 1 6 3 376 0 3
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 398 3 3 10 350 0 2 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 471 0 2 6 366 0 5
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 455 2 6 8 387 0 1
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 528 5 1 9 394 0 3
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 458 1 2 2 359 0 3
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 405 3 3 7 331 0 2
TOTAL 0 0 78 3 0 0 0 0 0 3595 21 27 54 2905 0 23
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 1104 7 23 32 1768 0 36 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 1912 8 11 25 1506 0 12 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.863 2.0%
PM 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.919 0.7%
AM 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.901 0.787
AM PM
0 0 0 0
1912 1104 1768 1506
8 7 32 25
PM AM
PHF

0.909 0.95 PHF

0.472 0 0 17 AM

0.667 0 0 32 PM
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
Peach Ave @ Herndon Ave (Eastern)
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
Eastbound

36.8375
-119.7181

Page 1 of 3 ends

Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
Northbound Westbound
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
283
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Avenue
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Peach Ave @ Herndon Ave (Eastern) 36.8375
Fresno -119.7181
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
0 Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
Peach Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
284
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Avenue
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Peach Ave @ Herndon Ave (Eastern)
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Peach Ave (Eastern)
Herndon Ave
Clear
One-Way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

285
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 14 30 9 7 2 35 24 5 4 4 13 157 16 3 3 8 260 27 7 10 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 27 56 21 14 12 36 22 10 8 4 11 177 10 6 3 16 328 31 17 10 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 43 55 19 11 8 43 46 18 9 3 13 210 30 14 3 25 418 46 6 1 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 41 67 39 30 3 41 68 16 11 7 17 275 42 18 5 17 426 67 27 9 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 51 27 21 13 4 33 38 17 8 4 14 236 56 19 7 26 350 57 21 13 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 57 42 18 8 2 34 42 13 8 6 11 211 28 9 9 15 357 38 9 11 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 39 34 21 12 5 29 31 15 9 2 10 188 27 9 7 14 301 35 8 13 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 36 43 17 11 4 31 32 19 9 3 9 176 26 14 3 16 360 39 9 10 TOTAL 308 354 165 106 40 282 303 113 66 33 98 1630 235 92 40 137 2800 340 104 77 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 31 37 26 22 0 50 45 30 21 3 17 376 42 22 2 25 263 28 7 6 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 39 57 25 23 3 60 45 22 15 3 11 387 55 25 6 47 331 30 10 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 55 46 28 27 1 74 64 21 10 3 17 329 35 19 6 41 286 31 10 4 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 45 57 36 31 0 72 56 15 6 4 12 447 41 28 3 30 302 32 11 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 38 54 25 21 1 71 63 22 9 2 17 436 39 18 4 46 340 35 16 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 32 47 29 26 0 52 38 19 12 2 18 466 42 23 3 43 349 35 10 3 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 26 51 25 24 1 51 70 14 7 5 16 412 46 18 2 29 323 27 5 2 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 39 54 23 17 1 28 36 12 10 0 20 362 29 15 3 34 292 25 7 1 TOTAL 305 403 217 191 7 458 417 155 90 22 128 3215 329 168 29 295 2486 243 76 19 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 192 191 97 62 17 151 194 64 36 20 55 932 156 60 24 83 1551 208 63 34 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 141 209 115 102 2 246 227 70 34 13 63 1761 168 87 12 148 1314 129 42 6 PHF Trucks
AM 0.868 2.5% PM 34 70 227 246 0.87
PM 0.968 0.7%
PM AM
AM 36 64 194 151 0.818
AM PM

0.947 0.856 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 63 42
63 55 208 129
1761 932 1551 1314
168 156 83 148
87 60 (RTOR) PHF 0.903 0.931

PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.816 192 191 97 62
PM 0.842 141 209 115 102
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Herndon Ave
Villa Ave

36.8376
-119.7137
Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Herndon Ave
Villa Ave
Eastbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Villa Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
286
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 1 0 0
PM Peak Total 1 2 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 2
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Villa Ave @ Herndon Ave 36.8376
Fresno -119.7137
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Villa Ave
Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
Villa Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
287
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME 160 Seconds CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Villa Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Villa Ave
Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends

288
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Avenue
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 195 6 6 310 0 10
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 218 23 7 0 388 0 8 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 255 27 3 0 508 0 3 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 322 34 7 0 533 0 10 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 269 20 9 0 400 0 10 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 269 10 9 0 410 0 10 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 227 15 8 0 350 0 15 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 209 20 7 0 421 0 11 TOTAL 0 0 116 13 0 0 0 0 0 1964 155 56 0 3320 0 77
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 33 2 0 0 0 0 0 440 15 7 0 313 0 6 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 431 17 5 0 404 0 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 450 27 10 0 353 0 3 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 536 43 6 0 388 0 2 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 526 27 7 0 394 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 538 31 4 0 410 0 3 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 495 6 3 0 360 0 1
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 407 19 3 0 351 0 1 TOTAL 0 0 242 4 0 0 0 0 0 3823 185 45 0 2973 0 18
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 62 6 0 0 0 0 0 1115 91 28 0 1851 0 33 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 142 1 0 0 0 0 0 2095 107 20 0 1552 0 6 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.862 2.1%
PM 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.967 0.7%
AM 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.951 0.847
AM PM
0 0 0 0
2095 1115 1851 1552
107 91 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.868 0.946 PHF

0.775 0 0 62 AM

0.592 0 0 142 PM
Turning Movement Report
Southbound
Minnewawa Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
Eastbound

36.8375
-119.7094

Page 1 of 3 ends

Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
Northbound Westbound
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Westbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
289
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Avenue
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Minnewawa Ave @ Herndon Ave 36.8375
Fresno -119.7094
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
0 Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
Minnewawa Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
290
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Avenue
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Minnewawa Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Minnewawa Ave
Herndon Ave
Clear
One-Way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

291
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 1 1 0 22 0 0 0 3 9 202 0 0 8 1 303 25 6 11 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 2 1 0 17 1 2 2 2 6 225 1 0 5 9 377 44 4 11 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 28 0 3 1 2 6 252 1 0 5 0 516 54 3 7 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 26 0 3 0 3 4 328 2 0 10 3 513 63 6 10 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 3 2 1 21 1 1 1 1 7 275 1 0 9 10 397 37 0 14 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 2 2 0 24 2 5 4 4 9 266 10 1 9 15 399 21 1 12 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 1 0 3 2 0 18 0 3 2 3 4 231 0 0 7 1 345 32 2 14 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 2 2 0 12 0 2 2 2 8 234 1 0 8 4 414 28 4 11 TOTAL 2 0 14 10 1 168 4 19 12 20 53 2013 16 1 61 43 3264 304 26 90 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 5 0 8 6 0 28 1 2 0 3 21 447 1 0 5 5 313 45 10 8 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 1 0 5 4 0 35 1 3 3 1 8 445 2 0 5 5 378 48 4 4 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 4 0 2 2 0 41 1 6 1 1 12 467 1 0 10 6 337 40 11 3 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 6 0 8 3 0 32 0 2 2 1 12 554 3 0 9 7 384 47 6 2 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 4 2 4 2 2 30 0 9 7 0 17 557 0 0 5 5 380 59 4 2 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 1 0 2 1 0 21 0 2 2 0 13 524 1 0 4 4 401 42 0 3 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 2 0 11 6 0 20 0 4 2 0 21 534 5 0 5 6 331 42 4 2 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 13 0 8 7 0 11 414 3 0 3 7 327 34 3 2 TOTAL 24 2 40 24 2 220 3 36 24 6 115 3942 16 0 46 45 2851 357 42 26 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 1 0 6 4 1 99 3 12 6 10 26 1121 14 1 33 28 1825 175 10 43 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 13 2 25 12 2 103 0 17 13 1 63 2169 9 0 23 22 1496 190 14 9 PHF Trucks
AM 0.878 2.6% PM 13 17 0 103 0.769
PM 0.963 0.9%
PM AM
AM 6 12 3 99 0.919
AM PM

0.976 0.869 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 10 14
63 26 175 190
2169 1121 1825 1496
9 14 28 22
0 1 (RTOR) PHF 0.876 0.955

PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.583 1 0 6 4
PM 0.714 13 2 25 12

Page 1 of 3 ends

Herndon Ave
Dewitt Ave
Eastbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Dewitt Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear

36.8373
-119.7068
Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Herndon Ave
Dewitt Ave
292
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 1 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 1 AM 0 0 0 1 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
1 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Dewitt Ave
Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
Dewitt Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Dewitt Ave @ Herndon Ave 36.8373
Fresno -119.7068
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
293
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS Eastbound/westbound approaches have protected
left turns. Northbound/southbound approaches
have permitted left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends

131 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
Dewitt Ave @ Herndon Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Dewitt Ave
294
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 1 105 2 0 6 1 177 0 0 3 2 0 11 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 4 149 3 0 5 6 181 0 0 4 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 6 1 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 1 168 1 0 6 7 232 0 0 2 2 0 18 18 0 0 0 6 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 3 169 3 0 5 3 234 2 0 7 2 0 11 10 0 0 0 7 2 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 4 161 4 0 7 1 184 1 0 4 3 0 10 8 0 0 1 7 3 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 5 156 0 0 6 5 185 2 1 5 1 0 9 6 1 0 0 6 2 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 3 168 1 0 5 5 161 3 0 3 3 3 8 8 0 0 0 3 2 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 6 168 3 0 9 3 148 2 1 4 1 0 7 7 0 2 0 9 1 0 TOTAL 27 1244 17 0 49 31 1502 10 2 32 14 3 87 78 1 3 1 44 11 1 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 19 275 7 3 3 8 174 3 1 5 2 1 0 0 1 3 0 29 5 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 20 325 2 0 1 8 243 8 1 5 2 0 2 0 0 3 0 17 3 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 15 299 3 0 1 4 240 5 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 4 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 16 324 2 0 1 4 218 7 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 13 6 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 19 331 1 0 1 7 241 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 18 10 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 16 366 6 0 2 7 226 5 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 1 2 22 7 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 20 337 1 0 1 4 265 11 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 10 3 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 10 334 2 0 1 1 220 4 0 1 5 1 4 0 0 0 1 10 4 0 TOTAL 135 2591 24 3 11 43 1827 47 6 16 22 3 9 0 2 12 9 136 42 2 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 13 654 8 0 24 16 835 5 1 18 8 0 48 42 1 0 1 26 7 1 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 65 1368 10 0 5 19 952 24 2 2 13 2 6 0 0 5 8 60 24 0 PHF Trucks
AM 0.928 2.7% PM 2 24 952 19 0.888
PM 0.963 0.3%
PM AM
AM 1 5 835 16 0.895
AM PM

0.525 0.7 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 7 24
13 8 26 60
2 0 1 8
6 48 0 5
0 42 (RTOR) PHF 0.844 0.73

PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.964 13 654 8 0
PM 0.93 65 1368 10 0
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Spruce Ave
Willow Ave

36.8410
-119.7296
Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Spruce Ave
Willow Ave
Eastbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Spruce Ave @ Willow Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
295
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 8 PM 0 1 0 5
PM Peak Total 1 16 AM 0 0 0 4 Peds <>
0 4
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 8
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
3 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Spruce Ave @ Willow Ave 36.8410
Fresno -119.7296
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Willow Ave
Spruce Ave Spruce Ave
Willow Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
296
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME 130 Seconds CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Spruce Ave @ Willow Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Willow Ave
Spruce Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends

297
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 4 140 9 0 9 5 174 1 0 3 1 1 3 3 0 2 3 3 2 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 5 187 12 1 6 12 146 5 0 4 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 7 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 6 243 21 8 3 15 228 16 0 4 3 1 6 5 0 3 1 6 6 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 11 263 40 9 6 14 232 21 0 4 4 0 3 2 0 3 0 13 11 1 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 9 212 16 4 6 20 183 13 0 3 10 0 5 4 0 5 1 4 4 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 14 157 5 0 6 7 171 16 0 2 14 1 6 6 1 1 1 9 9 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 4 187 4 0 10 8 150 12 0 2 7 0 11 8 0 1 0 3 3 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 12 180 4 1 4 7 125 13 0 4 17 0 7 6 1 2 0 3 3 1 TOTAL 65 1569 111 23 50 88 1409 97 0 26 63 4 41 34 2 18 6 48 45 4 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 12 235 9 2 2 22 206 10 0 6 21 3 18 12 0 6 2 6 6 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 16 269 4 1 1 25 223 14 0 6 34 2 14 8 2 9 0 5 5 1 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 20 247 4 4 1 18 265 10 0 3 30 3 24 20 0 17 1 16 16 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 17 244 9 0 0 26 227 11 0 4 32 3 19 15 0 7 4 12 12 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 18 293 4 1 2 20 270 5 0 0 37 1 30 22 0 3 5 12 12 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 22 278 1 1 1 38 278 8 0 1 42 4 23 17 0 9 2 11 11 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 16 272 8 5 1 23 222 6 0 0 35 6 20 13 0 11 2 8 8 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 6 247 5 0 1 18 235 7 0 1 35 4 23 18 0 4 1 7 7 0 TOTAL 127 2085 44 14 9 190 1926 71 0 21 266 26 171 125 2 66 17 77 77 2 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 40 875 82 21 21 56 814 66 0 13 31 2 20 17 1 12 3 32 30 2 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 77 1062 18 6 4 102 1040 34 0 8 141 11 96 74 0 36 12 51 51 1 PHF Trucks
AM 0.841 1.8% PM 0 34 1040 102 0.907
PM 0.936 0.5%
PM AM
AM 0 66 814 56 0.876
AM PM

0.899 0.631 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 30 51
141 31 32 51
11 2 3 12
96 20 12 36
74 17 (RTOR) PHF 0.734 0.728

PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.794 40 875 82 21
PM 0.918 77 1062 18 6
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Magill Ave
Willow Ave

36.8357
-119.7296
Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Magill Ave
Willow Ave
Eastbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Willow Ave @ Magill Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
298
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 6 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
3 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 1
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
2 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Willow Ave @ Magill Ave 36.8357
Fresno -119.7296
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Willow Ave
Magill Ave Magill Ave
Willow Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
299
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME 134 Seconds CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Willow Ave @ Magill Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Willow Ave
Magill Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends

300
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 30 50 16 11 2 15 32 15 15 2 31 128 24 9 2 16 225 28 7 7 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 31 83 24 13 1 16 38 24 22 1 56 204 26 19 6 26 307 51 4 4 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 43 110 30 18 1 18 61 37 26 1 55 275 29 15 5 25 391 67 7 2 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 60 157 37 27 1 27 71 28 19 1 78 272 38 11 4 30 418 103 21 3 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 35 104 33 20 1 27 64 37 31 1 67 227 39 13 2 32 301 78 9 4 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 45 97 24 13 3 20 85 36 29 3 66 227 44 20 8 44 335 68 19 4 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 45 80 27 10 0 38 86 45 33 0 70 229 38 19 7 30 320 63 17 6 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 35 123 46 27 6 29 68 47 32 3 97 254 43 17 6 32 338 81 13 3 TOTAL 324 804 237 139 15 190 505 269 207 12 520 1816 281 123 40 235 2635 539 97 33 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 47 125 53 30 2 78 133 55 24 2 61 335 75 27 6 69 282 31 9 3 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 52 94 57 28 1 67 137 49 28 2 57 298 72 26 5 61 299 43 8 3 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 39 126 50 22 1 83 138 74 46 1 64 357 78 21 2 65 306 38 11 4 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 40 104 53 28 1 71 116 56 31 6 80 457 90 27 5 49 273 43 10 3 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 45 112 55 22 1 97 173 87 52 1 58 430 68 27 3 55 361 36 12 3 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 59 140 64 33 5 75 140 46 26 2 68 403 86 34 3 67 304 43 5 3 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 48 125 55 35 0 69 119 64 41 2 60 376 65 20 3 44 250 31 8 2 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 41 101 62 41 5 51 107 33 22 3 82 315 68 24 2 57 248 48 8 1 TOTAL 371 927 449 239 16 591 1063 464 270 19 530 2971 602 206 29 467 2323 313 71 22 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 183 468 124 78 6 92 281 138 105 6 266 1001 150 59 19 131 1445 316 56 13 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 183 482 222 105 8 326 567 263 155 10 270 1647 322 109 13 236 1244 160 38 13 PHF Trucks
AM 0.871 1.0% PM 155 263 567 326 0.81
PM 0.939 0.7%
PM AM
AM 105 138 281 92 0.906
AM PM

0.893 0.913 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 56 38
270 266 316 160
1647 1001 1445 1244
322 150 131 236
109 59 (RTOR) PHF 0.858 0.907

PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.763 183 468 124 78
PM 0.843 183 482 222 105
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Herndon Ave
Cedar Ave

36.8373
-119.7542
Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Herndon Ave
Cedar Ave
Eastbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Herndon Ave @ Cedar Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, July 27, 2021 Clear
301
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 6
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 11
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 3
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 4 9 PM 0 1 0 6
PM Peak Total 1 21 AM 0 0 0 2 Peds <>
3 1
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
1 9
Peds <>
5 0 4 0 AM
3 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Herndon Ave @ Cedar Ave 36.8373
Fresno -119.7542
Tuesday, July 27, 2021 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Cedar Ave
Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
Cedar Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
302
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME 149 Seconds CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Herndon Ave @ Cedar Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, July 27, 2021
Cedar Ave
Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends

303
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 6 2 7 7 0 26 3 29 6 1 26 141 5 2 3 2 243 32 8 7 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 15 8 9 7 0 27 4 50 32 1 37 186 4 1 3 3 307 51 19 4 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 22 18 10 9 1 51 5 54 23 1 51 257 3 2 6 3 408 46 21 5 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 17 10 9 8 0 43 6 47 26 0 65 274 10 0 4 3 487 91 17 4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 16 12 10 7 1 21 3 50 9 0 43 245 4 3 4 5 353 88 14 4 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 15 5 4 2 0 36 4 45 19 1 49 226 6 1 4 2 408 66 10 5 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 11 6 5 3 0 31 7 61 24 1 51 218 7 0 5 1 320 56 17 5 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 16 12 13 11 3 41 8 59 27 0 34 274 9 1 8 3 355 57 17 3 TOTAL 118 73 67 54 5 276 40 395 166 5 356 1821 48 10 37 22 2881 487 123 37 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 10 5 6 2 0 49 11 73 29 0 52 397 11 3 3 5 332 41 17 5 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 10 5 10 8 0 63 17 58 20 0 41 364 14 3 4 9 313 44 17 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 6 7 7 4 0 78 10 62 31 0 48 426 13 2 4 4 303 43 16 2 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 10 6 9 7 0 55 14 70 17 0 50 504 22 5 2 7 316 52 18 4 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 7 6 5 4 0 113 24 87 35 0 41 503 14 5 2 8 345 36 11 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 10 12 5 5 0 73 20 76 19 0 51 495 19 8 3 14 304 48 16 4 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 17 9 16 8 0 70 20 46 10 1 43 428 14 4 3 9 287 60 16 2 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 12 13 5 5 0 51 11 50 13 0 42 370 16 2 1 11 285 40 13 1 TOTAL 82 63 63 43 0 552 127 522 174 1 368 3487 123 32 22 67 2485 364 124 21 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 70 45 33 26 2 151 18 196 77 2 208 1002 23 6 18 13 1656 291 62 18 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 44 33 35 24 0 311 78 279 81 1 185 1930 69 22 10 38 1252 196 61 11 PHF Trucks
AM 0.872 1.1% PM 81 279 78 311 0.746
PM 0.936 0.5%
PM AM
AM 77 196 18 151 0.83
AM PM

0.948 0.883 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 62 61
185 208 291 196
1930 1002 1656 1252
69 23 13 38
22 6 (RTOR) PHF 0.843 0.955

PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.74 70 45 33 26
PM 0.667 44 33 35 24

Page 1 of 3 ends

Herndon Ave
Maple Ave
Eastbound Westbound
Turning Movement Report
Herndon Ave @ Maple Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, July 27, 2021 Clear

36.8376
-119.7452
Northbound Southbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Herndon Ave
Maple Ave
304
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 2 1 PM 0 0 0 2
PM Peak Total 1 2 AM 0 2 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
1 0 0 0 AM
0 0 1 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Maple Ave
Herndon Ave Herndon Ave
Maple Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Herndon Ave @ Maple Ave 36.8376
Fresno -119.7452
Tuesday, July 27, 2021 Clear
305
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends

158 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
Herndon Ave @ Maple Ave
Fresno
Tuesday, July 27, 2021
Maple Ave
306
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

HERNDON AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY
24-Hour Counts
307
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group 862 Pollasky Ave
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Clovis, CA 93612
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 21 26 21 12 80 18 13 16 13 60 140
1:00 AM 14 6 11 9 40 11 8 12 7 38 78
2:00 AM 7 5 8 6 26 6 10 6 5 27 53
3:00 AM 9 7 9 16 41 8 7 16 17 48 89
4:00 AM 8 18 27 38 91 21 14 28 24 87 178
5:00 AM 35 47 53 62 197 31 32 69 91 223 420
6:00 AM 69 68 122 157 416 116 131 220 294 761 1177
7:00 AM 162 189 220 333 904 273 345 437 463 1518 2422
8:00 AM 277 224 201 220 922 384 393 347 385 1509 2431
9:00 AM 229 195 239 213 876 293 297 327 342 1259 2135
10:00 AM 281 259 258 270 1068 273 311 361 326 1271 2339 11:00 AM 305 284 308 285 1182 258 307 366 306 1237 2419 12:00 PM 296 295 312 287 1190 346 332 315 373 1366 2556 1:00 PM 313 312 260 300 1185 332 362 322 336 1352 2537
2:00 PM 265 331 349 373 1318 328 340 362 366 1396 2714
3:00 PM 380 376 399 398 1553 338 366 386 371 1461 3014
4:00 PM 384 423 374 424 1605 324 348 339 341 1352 2957
5:00 PM 425 507 399 362 1693 356 356 339 296 1347 3040
6:00 PM 275 337 276 236 1124 274 244 257 204 979 2103
7:00 PM 186 184 193 177 740 171 144 144 139 598 1338
8:00 PM 128 145 127 115 515 127 132 101 83 443 958
9:00 PM 94 102 74 76 346 82 70 65 64 281 627
10:00 PM 55 56 48 38 197 56 47 50 37 190 387
11:00 PM 39 27 43 31 140 30 18 32 23 103 243
17449 18906
AM% 38.2% AM Peak 2731 7:30 am to 8:30 am AM P.H.F. 0.86 PM% 61.8% PM Peak 3147 4:45 pm to 5:45 pm PM P.H.F. 0.91 Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
24 Hour Count Report
Herndon Ave 36.83751524
Between Helm / Peach -119.7230562
6 Eastbound Westbound Hourly
Totals
Total 48.0% 52.0%
36355
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
# of vehicles
Time Period
Eastbound
Westbound
308
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group 862 Pollasky Ave
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Clovis, CA 93612
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 21 20 22 12 75 18 16 18 18 70 145
1:00 AM 14 11 12 9 46 11 9 11 8 39 85
2:00 AM 8 4 9 7 28 5 9 6 6 26 54
3:00 AM 9 17 9 18 53 9 8 12 17 46 99
4:00 AM 8 22 29 44 103 19 15 26 28 88 191
5:00 AM 38 57 66 62 223 32 32 61 82 207 430
6:00 AM 71 81 148 181 481 122 135 216 299 772 1253
7:00 AM 184 206 238 351 979 287 357 463 495 1602 2581
8:00 AM 288 247 231 221 987 423 419 363 412 1617 2604
9:00 AM 243 216 250 240 949 287 295 332 341 1255 2204
10:00 AM 303 282 283 282 1150 284 305 356 336 1281 2431 11:00 AM 319 341 354 313 1327 265 314 392 331 1302 2629 12:00 PM 340 332 348 350 1370 347 362 319 387 1415 2785 1:00 PM 336 328 310 318 1292 332 367 333 340 1372 2664
2:00 PM 299 356 361 415 1431 332 345 368 394 1439 2870
3:00 PM 395 406 430 452 1683 362 373 396 398 1529 3212
4:00 PM 441 462 410 482 1795 351 379 360 372 1462 3257
5:00 PM 460 540 463 421 1884 395 403 361 338 1497 3381
6:00 PM 330 367 316 263 1276 277 269 280 241 1067 2343
7:00 PM 233 222 226 194 875 180 153 156 148 637 1512
8:00 PM 154 169 151 136 610 132 143 103 97 475 1085
9:00 PM 110 115 89 88 402 86 75 67 66 294 696
10:00 PM 67 76 56 41 240 57 47 52 39 195 435
11:00 PM 46 29 41 33 149 37 20 35 21 113 262
19408 19800
AM% 37.5% AM Peak 2629 11:00 am to 12:00 pm AM P.H.F. 0.88 PM% 62.5% PM Peak 3476 4:45 pm to 5:45 pm PM P.H.F. 0.92 6 Eastbound Westbound Hourly
Totals
Total 49.5% 50.5%
39208
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
24 Hour Count Report
Herndon Ave 36.83754545
Between Peach / Villa -119.7167082
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
# of vehicles
Time Period
Eastbound
Westbound
309
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group 862 Pollasky Ave
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Clovis, CA 93612
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 24 21 27 15 87 21 17 18 18 74 161
1:00 AM 22 15 19 17 73 10 10 11 9 40 113
2:00 AM 10 5 13 8 36 4 11 5 8 28 64
3:00 AM 10 9 11 24 54 12 8 12 21 53 107
4:00 AM 10 25 37 75 147 18 16 26 54 114 261
5:00 AM 52 65 70 96 283 38 39 70 112 259 542
6:00 AM 81 99 192 216 588 135 153 282 309 879 1467
7:00 AM 201 241 282 356 1080 310 388 508 533 1739 2819
8:00 AM 289 279 242 229 1039 400 410 350 421 1581 2620
9:00 AM 244 237 254 291 1026 281 325 313 381 1300 2326
10:00 AM 318 304 278 341 1241 290 299 372 345 1306 2547 11:00 AM 303 363 387 346 1399 322 317 371 321 1331 2730 12:00 PM 378 362 405 391 1536 312 422 367 388 1489 3025 1:00 PM 372 360 351 344 1427 337 371 345 354 1407 2834
2:00 PM 356 386 414 432 1588 352 359 389 368 1468 3056
3:00 PM 411 446 489 499 1845 386 375 385 402 1548 3393
4:00 PM 455 448 477 579 1959 313 404 353 388 1458 3417
5:00 PM 553 569 501 426 2049 394 410 360 351 1515 3564
6:00 PM 367 374 347 280 1368 297 283 260 221 1061 2429
7:00 PM 248 252 238 198 936 193 196 159 145 693 1629
8:00 PM 167 177 178 135 657 154 146 106 102 508 1165
9:00 PM 102 133 90 88 413 88 85 61 69 303 716
10:00 PM 79 81 58 38 256 62 45 58 51 216 472
11:00 PM 52 33 41 38 164 37 27 38 22 124 288
21251 20494
AM% 37.7% AM Peak 3057 7:30 am to 8:30 am AM P.H.F. 0.86 PM% 62.3% PM Peak 3754 4:45 pm to 5:45 pm PM P.H.F. 0.96 6 Eastbound Westbound Hourly
Totals
Total 50.9% 49.1%
41745
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
24 Hour Count Report
Herndon Ave 36.83748495
Between Villa / Dewitt -119.7101701
0 500
1000
1500
2000
2500
# of vehicles
Time Period
Eastbound
Westbound
310
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group 862 Pollasky Ave
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Clovis, CA 93612
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 3 3 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 7
1:00 AM 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 1 1 3 6
2:00 AM 1 2 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 4
3:00 AM 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:00 AM 0 1 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 7
5:00 AM 1 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 4
6:00 AM 3 7 7 10 27 1 0 0 1 2 29
7:00 AM 12 19 13 10 54 6 3 5 4 18 72
8:00 AM 27 21 30 35 113 3 3 5 4 15 128
9:00 AM 30 29 28 35 122 7 11 22 11 51 173
10:00 AM 39 46 41 47 173 10 20 20 23 73 246
11:00 AM 41 63 57 55 216 26 19 26 21 92 308
12:00 PM 69 70 79 63 281 24 35 29 43 131 412
1:00 PM 56 64 60 60 240 24 18 25 36 103 343
2:00 PM 54 57 51 50 212 32 31 28 32 123 335
3:00 PM 53 51 55 72 231 27 23 31 30 111 342
4:00 PM 56 74 60 68 258 40 26 25 28 119 377
5:00 PM 66 73 62 62 263 31 29 30 34 124 387
6:00 PM 59 60 55 45 219 37 19 35 28 119 338
7:00 PM 43 33 33 28 137 27 20 7 12 66 203
8:00 PM 11 20 17 18 66 11 13 14 2 40 106
9:00 PM 9 7 5 0 21 8 8 7 2 25 46
10:00 PM 3 7 2 1 13 2 3 0 2 7 20
11:00 PM 0 0 3 2 5 0 4 1 0 5 10
2677 1228
AM% 25.2% AM Peak 308 11:00 am to 12:00 pm AM P.H.F. 0.93 PM% 74.8% PM Peak 412 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm PM P.H.F. 0.95 Tuesday, March 23, 2021 Clear
24 Hour Count Report
Helm Ave 36.83817516
North of Herndon Ave -119.7248328
4 Northbound Southbound Hourly
Totals
Total 68.6% 31.4%
3905
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
# of vehicles
Time Period
Northbound
Southbound
311
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group 862 Pollasky Ave
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Clovis, CA 93612
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 2 6 1 1 10 11
1:00 AM 3 3 0 1 7 1 0 0 0 1 8
2:00 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 4
3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2
4:00 AM 1 2 2 3 8 0 0 0 1 1 9
5:00 AM 0 2 3 5 10 1 2 0 4 7 17
6:00 AM 5 15 18 26 64 7 19 17 18 61 125
7:00 AM 7 37 37 33 114 6 25 42 49 122 236
8:00 AM 16 19 18 16 69 40 30 18 27 115 184
9:00 AM 16 28 11 17 72 24 26 30 32 112 184
10:00 AM 13 22 25 19 79 26 33 24 23 106 185
11:00 AM 27 18 26 21 92 46 34 26 37 143 235
12:00 PM 31 40 41 35 147 44 43 39 52 178 325
1:00 PM 19 36 23 19 97 56 38 32 34 160 257
2:00 PM 27 15 30 45 117 38 43 39 39 159 276
3:00 PM 23 33 30 18 104 56 45 30 46 177 281
4:00 PM 27 16 40 28 111 42 51 45 47 185 296
5:00 PM 37 27 29 31 124 60 61 39 51 211 335
6:00 PM 28 27 28 19 102 42 45 41 41 169 271
7:00 PM 16 13 11 9 49 28 22 24 18 92 141
8:00 PM 14 11 7 12 44 15 20 19 9 63 107
9:00 PM 7 14 3 6 30 10 9 10 7 36 66
10:00 PM 8 22 4 3 37 7 9 4 1 21 58
11:00 PM 2 0 0 2 4 0 1 3 3 7 11
1485 2139
AM% 33.1% AM Peak 279 7:15 am to 8:15 am AM P.H.F. 0.85 PM% 66.9% PM Peak 345 4:30 pm to 5:30 pm PM P.H.F. 0.89 2 Northbound Southbound Hourly
Totals
Total 41.0% 59.0%
3624
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
24 Hour Count Report
Peach Ave 36.83715079
South of Herndon Ave -119.7201906
0 50
100
150
200
250
# of vehicles
Time Period
Northbound
Southbound
312
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group 862 Pollasky Ave
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Clovis, CA 93612
www.metrotrafficdata.com

STREET LATITUDE

SEGMENT LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 1 5 1 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 8
1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
4:00 AM 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 0 0 1 4
5:00 AM 0 3 2 4 9 0 0 1 1 2 11
6:00 AM 2 3 6 3 14 0 1 2 3 6 20
7:00 AM 7 11 15 18 51 5 3 6 14 28 79
8:00 AM 14 13 16 15 58 10 12 8 19 49 107
9:00 AM 11 29 27 26 93 10 14 17 21 62 155
10:00 AM 31 35 36 28 130 20 15 16 12 63 193
11:00 AM 38 58 52 55 203 29 27 29 30 115 318
12:00 PM 65 60 63 64 252 29 30 30 26 115 367
1:00 PM 55 51 46 36 188 27 26 17 20 90 278
2:00 PM 56 36 51 48 191 16 24 22 30 92 283
3:00 PM 43 36 63 53 195 32 22 17 24 95 290
4:00 PM 66 45 60 68 239 20 33 27 33 113 352
5:00 PM 63 83 85 64 295 31 31 26 22 110 405
6:00 PM 66 64 57 53 240 22 10 11 8 51 291
7:00 PM 61 42 44 41 188 15 9 15 4 43 231
8:00 PM 25 26 26 21 98 7 10 6 2 25 123
9:00 PM 16 13 18 16 63 5 4 3 3 15 78
10:00 PM 6 8 3 4 21 1 0 1 1 3 24
11:00 PM 2 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 4
2543 1080
AM% 24.8% AM Peak 318 11:00 am to 12:00 pm AM P.H.F. 0.94 PM% 75.2% PM Peak 420 4:45 pm to 5:45 pm PM P.H.F. 0.92 Tuesday, March 9, 2021 Clear
24 Hour Count Report
Spruce Ave 36.84010358
Between Helm Ave / Peach Ave -119.7224009
2 Eastbound Westbound Hourly
Totals
Total 70.2% 29.8%
3623
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
# of vehicles
Time Period
Eastbound
Westbound
313
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

HERNDON AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY

APPENDIX B

FRESNO COUNTY TRAVEL MODEL OUTPUT
314
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Licensed to Peters Engineering
AM and PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
2019 Fresno County Travel Demand Model
104
37 110
93 98763
9 80
31 153
37 118
100
132
180
126
419
411
227
8 3
5 9
332
96 196
307
97 74
117
92 82
61 83
11 8
41 24
40 40
70 175
164
110
42 78
98 57
36 42
48 34
72 52
59 72
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
16 19
67 50
74 86 81628356
0 0
0 0
7 15
11 8
2 1
1 1
310
0 181
72 127
201
0 1
1 0
50 105
95 84
111
89 121
123
140
7 0
288
288
331
280
79 41
82 73 9552 103 49770 399 Chestnut 329 575
91 3393 S
2088 R 168
1428
3450
SR 168
37 72
58 41
erra
erra
69 72
58 41
Sierra
Sierra
69 72
58 41
Sierra Sierra
1543
2141
erndon
985 Chest 678
nut
329
575 329
575 Chestnut 201 772 750 649 Chestnut Chestnut 201 772 750 649 Chestnut Chestnut 69 72 58
41 Sierra Sierra 201 772 750 649 621 728 209 719 Chestnut Chestnut 49 105
42 22
Sierra Sierra
728
209
621
719
49 105
42 22
49 105
42 22
Sierra
Sierra 1296 1694 Willow
63 105
49 22
Sierra
Sierra
63 49
22 63
105
49 22
Sierra Sierra Willow 1354 2062
1297
1673
100
231
193
148
Sierra Sierra 1973 1349 1297 1673 Willow 728 209 621 719 621 728 209 719 Chestnut Chestnut 276 629
666
653 Chestnut Chestnut 653 629 276 666
629
276
653
666 276 629 666 653 276 629 666 653
Chestnut
Chestnut
1905
1594
erndon
1917
2298
Herndon 583 812 Chestnut
583 812
Chestnut 985
678
583
812
Chestnut
985 678
Chestnut 1297 1673 Willow
1973
1349 Willow Willow 1349 1973 1982 1426 Willow
2231
1873
Herndon
1329
1883
Herndon 1068 1828 Willow 1001 1811 Willow
100
231
193
148
100
231
193
148
Sierra Sierra
100
231
193
148
100
231
193
148
Sierra Sierra
69 74
85 119
Sierra Sierra
69 74
85 69
74 85
119
69 74
85 119
Sierra Sierra
30 50
51 39 Peach Peach 72183599 Peach Peach
79 82
135
208
Sierra
Sierra 72183599 Peach Peach 72183599 Peach Peach
35 18
99 72 Peach Peach 100 60 155 141
1274
1847
Herndon
60 10
141 155 Peach
Peach
1792
1772
Herndon
295
264
318
413 Peach Peach
0 0
0 0
Fir
Fir 295 264 318 413 Peach Peach 413 264 295 318 237 308 151 370 Peach Peach 0 0
0 0
Fir Fir 1274
1847
Herndon Villa 775 744 782 916 Villa Villa 775 744 782 916 Villa Villa 748 735 814 853 Villa 116
160
161
196
Sierra Sierra
79 82
135
208
Sierra Sierra 814 735 853 748 Villa Villa 735 814 748 853 Villa Villa 116
160
161
196
Sierra Sierra
128
171
181
213
Sierra Sierra
128
171
181
213
Sierra Sierra
128
171
181
213
128
171
181
213
Sierra Sierra 735 814 748 853 Villa Villa
698
782
717
821 Villa Villa Vi 748 735 814 853lla Villa 698
782
717
821 Villa Villa Villa 717 698 782 821 Villa
1727
1628
Herndon
0 0
0 0
0 0
Fir
Fir
1030
1640
Herndon
1727
1628
Herndon 501 575 493 647 Villa Villa
501
575
493
647 Villa Villa
501 575 493
647
Vil/Minnew Vil/Minnew
1030
1640
Herndon
147
281 Minnewawa
1030
1640
Herndon
1326
1164
Herndon
120
129
191
117
Alluvial
Alluvial
770
399 Chestnut 329 575 Chestnut 399 770
338 616 Chestn
122
141
195
127
Alluvial
Alluvial 76
43 Ches
125
128
191
204
129
176
240
198
Alluvial
Alluvial
129
176
240
198
Alluvial
Alluvial
280
195
343
271
Alluvial
Alluvial
280
195
343
271
Alluvial
Alluvial
210
153
223
266
Alluvial
Alluvial
210
153
223
266
Alluvial
Alluvial 151
308
370
237 Peach Peach 151 308 370 237 Peach Peach 86 129 52 152 Peach Peach 21 45
66 43
Alluvial
Alluvial
21 97
66 208
Alluvial
Alluvial
21 45
66 43
Alluvial
Alluvial
276 536
Minnewawa
0 0
0 0147 281 Minnew276 536 awaMinnewawa
21 97
66 208
Alluvial
Alluvial
153
270
308
311
Alluvial
Alluvial 140 207 488 341 Minnew
153
270
308
311
Alluvial
Alluvial
153
270
308
311
128
171
181
213
Sierra Sierra
128
171
181
213
Sierra
Sierra
0 0
0 0
1030
1640
Herndon
1326
1164
Herndon
A
A
3157
1856 SR 168
1326
1164
Herndon
1982
1426 1363 1707 Willow
280
195
343
271
Alluvial
Alluvial 1001 1811 Willow 1556 1184 Willow 1363 1707 Willow 122
141
195
127
Alluvial
Alluvial 295 264 318 413 Peach Peach
129
176
240
198
Alluvial
Alluvial
60 100
141
155
Peach
Peach
236
232 Herndon/168
6 0
0 0
10 141
15 1792
1772
Herndon
1774
1821
Herndon
1329
1883
Herndon
1030
1640
Herndon
1030
1640
Herndon Willow 1184 1556
1001
1811 Willow 1068 1828 Willo
w
50571
5 493
647
1 2
Minne
1428
3450
SR 168 1556 1184 Willow
1982
1426
Willo
w 1556 1184 Willow 1068 1828 Willow 1068 1828 Willow 1556 1184 Willow 315
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Licensed to Peters Engineering
AM and PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
2035 Fresno County Travel Demand Model
108
68 129
78 6119 158 123
138
35 175
50 205
113
186
201
100
385
375
205
7 2
5 6
295
90 174
302
67 79
107
78 198
76 96
123
47 31
49 50
99 228
205
151
68 84
119
76 37
53 53
40 73
53 63
92 0
0 0
0 2
2 1
21 31
135
68 110
125 89525558
0 0
0 0
3 14
10 7
2 3
3 3
950
0 177
70 142
208
15 1
2 2
83 94
135
99 117
155
190
145
133
111
305
388
395
328
59 49
166
91 107 240 257 87684 446 Chestnut 251 698
12 5332 S
2782 R 168
1959
4536
SR 168
0 0
0 0
Old Town
Old Town
30 67
72 72
erra
erra
125
267
172
72 Sierra
Sierra
125
267
172
72 Sierra Sierra
2139
2559
erndon
age Rd
age Rd
908 Chest 824
nut
251
698 251
698 Chestnut 247 1500 993 835 Chestnut Chestnut 247 1500 993 835 Chestnut Chestnut 125 267
172
72 Sierra Sierra 247 1500 993 835 830 1307 252 918 Chestnut Chestnut 27 367
211
42 Sierra Sierra
252
830
918
27 367
211
42 27
367
211
42 Sierra
Sierra 1405 2105 Willow
38 356
220
42 Sierra
Sierra
38 42
38 356
220
42 Sierra Sierra Willow 1691 1999
1363
2110
112
457
349
221
Sierra Sierra 1929 1646 1363 2110 Willow 1307 252 830 918 830 1307 252 918 Chestnut Chestnut 325 1262
851
865 Chestnut Chestnut 1262 865 325 851
325
865
851 325 851 865 325 1262 851 865
Chestnut
Chestnut
1767
1342
erndon
2059
2772
Herndon 568 1084 Chestnut
568 1084
Chestnut 908
824
568
1084
Chestnut
908 824
Chestnut 1363 2110 Willow
1929
1646 Willow Willow 1646 1929 1995 1708 Willow
2284
1829
Herndon
2052
2452
Herndon 1274 2411 Willow 1235 2361 Willow
112
457
349
221
112
457
349
221
Sierra Sierra
112
457
349
221
112
457
349
221
Sierra Sierra
119
332
222
179
Sierra Sierra
119
332
222
179
119
332
222
179
Sierra Sierra
38 51
52 50 Peach Peach 27689 296 242 Peach Peach
376
364
442
455
Sierra
Sierra 279 24682 296 Peach Peach 279 24682 296 Peach Peach 68 279
296
242 Peach Peach 141 320 359 320
2055
2348
Herndon
320
14 3201
359 Peach
Peach
1977
1848
Herndon
262
501
365
402 Peach Peach
0 0
0 0
Fir
Fir 262 501 365 402 Peach Peach 402 501 262 365 255 523 181 471 Peach Peach 0 0
0 0
Fir Fir 2055
2348
Herndon 885 933 870 1062 Villa Villa Villa 885 933 870 1062 Villa Villa 789 792 816 877 Villa 264
340
365
288
Sierra Sierra
376
364
442
455
Sierra Sierra 816 792 877 789 Villa Villa 792 816 789 877 Villa Villa 264
340
365
288
Sierra Sierra
282
358
394
308
Sierra Sierra
282
358
394
308
Sierra Sierra
282
358
394
308
282
358
394
308
Sierra Sierra 792 816 789 877 Villa Villa
789
766
767
841 Villa Villa Vi 789 792 816 877lla Villa 789
766
767
841 Villa Villa Villa 767 789 766 841 Villa
1920
1668
Herndon
0 0
0 0
0 0
Fir
Fir
2136
2015
Herndon
1920
1668
Herndon 420 989 825 647 Villa Villa
420
989
825
647 Villa Villa
420 989 825
647
Vil/Minnew Vil/Minnew
2136
2015
Herndon
115
672 Minnewawa
2136
2015
Herndon
1453
1437
Herndon
231
306
453
254
Alluvial
Alluvial
684
446 Chestnut 251 698 Chestnut 446 684
266 711 Chestn
226
325
413
200
Alluvial
Alluvial 67
47 Ches
260
296
368
297
277
447
500
260
Alluvial
Alluvial
277
447
500
260
Alluvial
Alluvial
361
236
416
389
Alluvial
Alluvial
361
236
416
389
Alluvial
Alluvial
262
263
337
340
Alluvial
Alluvial
262
263
337
340
Alluvial
Alluvial 181
523
471
255 Peach Peach 181 523 471 255 Peach Peach 92 330 62 237 Peach Peach 30 106
110
42 Alluvial
Alluvial
30 156
110
201
Alluvial
Alluvial
30 106
110
42 Alluvial
Alluvial
353 957
Minnewawa
0 0
0 0115 672 Minnew353 957 awaMinnewawa
30 156
110
201
Alluvial
Alluvial
183
315
387
418
Alluvial
Alluvial 115 676 952 418 Minnew
183
315
387
418
Alluvial
Alluvial
183
315
387
418
282
358
394
308
Sierra Sierra
282
358
394
308
Sierra
Sierra
0 0
0 0
2136
2015
Herndon
1453
1437
Herndon
A
A
0 0
0 0
Dry Creek
Dry Creek
4287
2470 SR 168
1453
1437
Herndon
1995
1708 1407 2174 Willow
361
236
416
389
Alluvial
Alluvial 1235 2361 Willow 2255 1592 Willow 1407 2174 Willow 226
325
413
200
Alluvial
Alluvial 262 501 365 402 Peach Peach
277
447
500
260
Alluvial
Alluvial
320
141
320
359
Peach
Peach
1046
312 Herndon/168
3 0
0 20
14 3
1 20
359
1977
1848
Herndon
1885
1863
Herndon
2052
2452
Herndon
2136
2015
Herndon
2136
2015
Herndon Willow 1592 2255
1235
2361 Willow 1274 2411 Willo
w
42980
9 825
647
1 6
Minne
1959
4536
SR 168 2255 1592 Willow
1995
1708
Willo
w 2255 1592 Willow 1274 2411 Willow 1274 2411 Willow 2255 1592 Willow 0 0
0 0
Old Town
Old Town
0 0
0 0
Old Town
Old Town
0 0 Old Town
0 0
0 0
316
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

HERNDON AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY

APPENDIX C

INTERSECTION ANALYSES
317
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

HERNDON AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY
Year 2042 With Quad Intersections
318
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 171 1687 170 117 2415 216 179 286 75 144 305 199 Future Volume (vph) 171 1687 170 117 2415 216 179 286 75 144 305 199 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 0 250 250
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 149 125 124 165
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 2634 1941 956 651
Travel Time (s) 35.9 26.5 21.7 14.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 186 1834 185 127 2625 235 195 311 82 157 332 216 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 1834 185 127 2625 235 195 311 82 157 332 216 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 11.7 69.9 69.9 13.5 71.7 71.7 18.6 34.1 34.1 12.5 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 9.0% 53.8% 53.8% 10.4% 55.2% 55.2% 14.3% 26.2% 26.2% 9.6% 21.5% 21.5% Maximum Green (s) 7.7 65.0 65.0 9.5 66.8 66.8 14.6 29.2 29.2 8.5 23.1 23.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
319
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 7.7 65.0 65.0 9.5 66.8 66.8 14.6 29.2 29.2 8.5 23.1 23.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.51 0.51 0.11 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.72 0.21 0.51 1.00 0.27 0.98 0.74 0.18 0.70 1.00 0.52 Control Delay 117.0 12.4 2.8 45.5 28.5 4.1 117.5 59.0 2.7 76.5 103.4 18.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 117.0 12.4 2.8 45.5 28.5 4.1 117.5 59.0 2.7 76.5 103.4 18.0

LOS F B A D C A F E A E F B
Approach Delay 20.4 27.3 70.6 71.2
Approach LOS C C E E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 84 176 9 50 ~400 16 167 246 0 68 ~284 37 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#155 301 m32 m56 m#911 m19 #323 355 13 #114 #482 117 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2554 1861 876 571
Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 203 2542 866 250 2612 874 198 418 451 224 331 416 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.72 0.21 0.51 1.00 0.27 0.98 0.74 0.18 0.70 1.00 0.52 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 129 (99%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 130
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00
Intersection Signal Delay: 33.7 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
320
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 1834 185 127 2625 235 195 311 82 157 332 216 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.72 0.21 0.51 1.00 0.27 0.98 0.74 0.18 0.70 1.00 0.52 Control Delay 117.0 12.4 2.8 45.5 28.5 4.1 117.5 59.0 2.7 76.5 103.4 18.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 117.0 12.4 2.8 45.5 28.5 4.1 117.5 59.0 2.7 76.5 103.4 18.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 84 176 9 50 ~400 16 167 246 0 68 ~284 37 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#155 301 m32 m56 m#911 m19 #323 355 13 #114 #482 117 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2554 1861 876 571
Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 203 2542 866 250 2612 874 198 418 451 224 331 416 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.72 0.21 0.51 1.00 0.27 0.98 0.74 0.18 0.70 1.00 0.52 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 321
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1475 430 0 2510 163 0 1601 115 0 1515 263 Future Volume (vph) 0 1475 430 0 2510 163 0 1601 115 0 1515 263 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 225 275 150 325 215 265 265
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 16 16 23 16
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1941 1380 695 1246
Travel Time (s) 26.5 18.8 9.5 17.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1603 467 0 2728 177 0 1740 125 0 1647 286 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1603 467 0 2728 177 0 1740 125 0 1647 286 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm
Protected Phases 4826
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 Total Split (%) 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 73.1 73.1 73.1 73.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Min Min Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
322
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 73.1 73.1 73.1 73.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.52 0.95 0.20 0.94 0.21 0.89 0.49
Control Delay 10.5 11.1 18.4 5.8 51.8 24.3 46.5 33.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.5 11.1 18.4 5.8 51.8 24.3 46.5 33.7

LOS B B B A D C D C
Approach Delay 10.7 17.7 50.0 44.6
Approach LOS B B D D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 103 76 219 25 517 58 476 175
Queue Length 95th (ft) 152 133 #295 m41 #621 107 543 263 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1861 1300 615 1166
Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 150 215 265
Base Capacity (vph) 2859 897 2859 897 1842 588 1842 583 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.52 0.95 0.20 0.94 0.21 0.89 0.49 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.95
Intersection Signal Delay: 28.8 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
323
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBT NBR SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1603 467 2728 177 1740 125 1647 286 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.52 0.95 0.20 0.94 0.21 0.89 0.49
Control Delay 10.5 11.1 18.4 5.8 51.8 24.3 46.5 33.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.5 11.1 18.4 5.8 51.8 24.3 46.5 33.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 103 76 219 25 517 58 476 175
Queue Length 95th (ft) 152 133 #295 m41 #621 107 543 263 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1861 1300 615 1166
Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 150 215 265
Base Capacity (vph) 2859 897 2859 897 1842 588 1842 583 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.52 0.95 0.20 0.94 0.21 0.89 0.49 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 324
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 322 1273 1998 307 300 663
Future Volume (vph) 322 1273 1998 307 300 663
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 215 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 2 2 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.97 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 2787 3433 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 2787 3433 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 234 408
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1361 790
Travel Time (s) 18.8 18.6 18.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 350 1384 2172 334 326 721
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 350 1384 2172 334 326 721
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 748866
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 23.0 96.0 73.0 73.0 34.0 34.0
Total Split (%) 17.7% 73.8% 56.2% 56.2% 26.2% 26.2%
Maximum Green (s) 19.0 91.1 68.1 68.1 29.1 29.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
325
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 00000
Act Effct Green (s) 19.0 97.4 74.4 74.4 22.8 22.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.75 0.57 0.57 0.18 0.18
v/c Ratio 0.70 0.36 0.75 0.20 0.54 0.87
Control Delay 33.5 1.8 12.0 1.8 51.4 34.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 33.5 1.8 12.0 1.8 51.4 34.1

LOS C A B A D C
Approach Delay 8.2 10.6 39.5
Approach LOS A B D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 126 28 278 5 128 153
Queue Length 95th (ft) 181 36 428 17 168 229
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1281 710
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215
Base Capacity (vph) 501 3809 2909 1694 768 940
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.70 0.36 0.75 0.20 0.42 0.77
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 125 (96%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87
Intersection Signal Delay: 15.6 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
326
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 350 1384 2172 334 326 721
v/c Ratio 0.70 0.36 0.75 0.20 0.54 0.87
Control Delay 33.5 1.8 12.0 1.8 51.4 34.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 33.5 1.8 12.0 1.8 51.4 34.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 126 28 278 5 128 153
Queue Length 95th (ft) 181 36 428 17 168 229
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1281 710
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215
Base Capacity (vph) 501 3809 2909 1694 768 940
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.70 0.36 0.75 0.20 0.42 0.77
Intersection Summary
327
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1407 166 0 2181 266 0 94 0 0 307 136 Future Volume (vph) 0 1407 166 0 2181 266 0 94 0 0 307 136 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 130 160 115 240 50 90 220
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 3539 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 3539 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 121 187 16
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1361 619 1143 926
Travel Time (s) 18.6 8.4 19.5 15.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1529 180 0 2371 289 0 102 0 0 334 148 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1529 180 0 2371 289 0 102 0 0 334 148 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0000
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 4826
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 31.0 31.0 31.0
Total Split (%) 76.2% 76.2% 76.2% 76.2% 23.8% 23.8% 23.8% Maximum Green (s) 94.1 94.1 94.1 94.1 26.1 26.1 26.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Min Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
328
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 102.2 102.2 102.2 102.2 18.0 18.0 18.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.14 0.14 0.14
v/c Ratio 0.38 0.14 0.59 0.23 0.21 0.68 0.64
Control Delay 3.0 0.9 2.1 0.3 49.4 60.1 59.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.0 0.9 2.2 0.3 49.4 60.1 59.0

LOS A A A A D E E
Approach Delay 2.8 2.0 49.4 59.8
Approach LOS A A D E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 0 65 1 41 143 107
Queue Length 95th (ft) 176 18 69 0 65 185 172
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1281 539 1063 846
Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 115 220
Base Capacity (vph) 3996 1269 3996 1284 710 710 330
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 237 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.14 0.63 0.23 0.14 0.47 0.45
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 106 (82%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68
Intersection Signal Delay: 8.9 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
329
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1529 180 2371 289 102 334 148
v/c Ratio 0.38 0.14 0.59 0.23 0.21 0.68 0.64
Control Delay 3.0 0.9 2.1 0.3 49.4 60.1 59.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.0 0.9 2.2 0.3 49.4 60.1 59.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 0 65 1 41 143 107
Queue Length 95th (ft) 176 18 69 0 65 185 172
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1281 539 1063 846
Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 115 220
Base Capacity (vph) 3996 1269 3996 1284 710 710 330
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 237 0000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.14 0.63 0.23 0.14 0.47 0.45
Intersection Summary
330
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1361 46 142 2266 181 249
Future Volume (vph) 1361 46 142 2266 181 249
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 350 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 5085 1583 1770 5085 1770 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 5085 1583 1770 5085 1770 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 50 271
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30
Link Distance (ft) 619 1280 909
Travel Time (s) 8.4 17.5 20.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 1479 50 154 2463 197 271
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1479 50 154 2463 197 271
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8 2
Permitted Phases 4 2
Detector Phase 443822
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 67.0 67.0 30.0 97.0 33.0 33.0
Total Split (%) 51.5% 51.5% 23.1% 74.6% 25.4% 25.4%
Maximum Green (s) 62.1 62.1 25.1 92.1 29.0 29.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None C-Max Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
331
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 71.4 71.4 25.1 101.4 19.7 19.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.19 0.78 0.15 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.53 0.06 0.45 0.62 0.74 0.42
Control Delay 8.2 2.1 31.2 1.1 68.4 7.0
Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.2 2.1 31.2 1.1 68.4 7.0

LOS A A C A E A
Approach Delay 8.0 2.8 32.8
Approach LOS A A C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 102 1 119 24 161 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 142 7 m144 37 232 40
Internal Link Dist (ft) 539 1200 829
Turn Bay Length (ft) 350
Base Capacity (vph) 2793 891 341 3967 394 832
Starvation Cap Reductn 240 00000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.06 0.45 0.62 0.50 0.33
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 69 (53%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74
Intersection Signal Delay: 7.6 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave
332
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1479 50 154 2463 197 271
v/c Ratio 0.53 0.06 0.45 0.62 0.74 0.42
Control Delay 8.2 2.1 31.2 1.1 68.4 7.0
Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.2 2.1 31.2 1.1 68.4 7.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 102 1 119 24 161 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 142 7 m144 37 232 40
Internal Link Dist (ft) 539 1200 829
Turn Bay Length (ft) 350
Base Capacity (vph) 2793 891 341 3967 394 832
Starvation Cap Reductn 240 00000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.06 0.45 0.62 0.50 0.33
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 333
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 108 1240 262 113 2018 256 257 235 157 281 316 133 Future Volume (vph) 108 1240 262 113 2018 256 257 235 157 281 316 133 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 0 160 160
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.940 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3327 0 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3327 0 3433 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 185 153 105 107
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1280 1261 1032 465
Travel Time (s) 17.5 17.2 15.6 7.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 117 1348 285 123 2193 278 279 255 171 305 343 145 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 117 1348 285 123 2193 278 279 426 0 305 343 145 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 12.0 72.0 72.0 13.0 73.0 73.0 20.0 24.0 21.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 9.2% 55.4% 55.4% 10.0% 56.2% 56.2% 15.4% 18.5% 16.2% 19.2% 19.2% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 67.1 67.1 9.0 68.1 68.1 16.0 19.1 17.0 20.1 20.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
334
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 7.8 70.8 70.8 8.8 71.8 71.8 15.1 17.0 15.6 17.5 17.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.54 0.54 0.07 0.55 0.55 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.49 0.30 0.53 0.78 0.30 0.70 0.81 0.74 0.72 0.48 Control Delay 59.6 3.3 0.8 51.5 13.6 2.5 65.0 53.8 66.5 62.9 21.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.6 3.3 0.8 51.5 13.6 2.5 65.0 53.8 66.5 62.9 21.2

LOS E A A D B A E D E E C
Approach Delay 6.6 14.2 58.2 56.7
Approach LOS ABEE
Queue Length 50th (ft) 54 33 0 52 289 16 116 140 128 147 29 Queue Length 95th (ft) 88 51 0 m75 142 30 165 198 178 197 93 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1200 1181 952 385
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 211 2768 946 237 2807 942 427 578 448 547 335 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.49 0.30 0.52 0.78 0.30 0.65 0.74 0.68 0.63 0.43 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 82 (63%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81
Intersection Signal Delay: 23.0 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
335
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 117 1348 285 123 2193 278 279 426 305 343 145 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.49 0.30 0.53 0.78 0.30 0.70 0.81 0.74 0.72 0.48 Control Delay 59.6 3.3 0.8 51.5 13.6 2.5 65.0 53.8 66.5 62.9 21.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.6 3.3 0.8 51.5 13.6 2.5 65.0 53.8 66.5 62.9 21.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 54 33 0 52 289 16 116 140 128 147 29 Queue Length 95th (ft) 88 51 0 m75 142 30 165 198 178 197 93 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1200 1181 952 385
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 211 2768 946 237 2807 942 427 578 448 547 335 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.49 0.30 0.52 0.78 0.30 0.65 0.74 0.68 0.63 0.43 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 336
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
7: Minneawa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM HCM 6th TWSC 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1584 123 0 2382 0 84
Future Vol, veh/h 1584 123 0 2382 0 84
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 1722 134 0 2589 0 91
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 928
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - ---- 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - ---- 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 232
Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 232
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 30.2

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 232 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.394 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 30.2 - - -
HCM Lane LOS D - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 - - -
337
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 36 1615 17 35 2349 238 1 1 7 135 4 32 Future Volume (vph) 36 1615 17 35 2349 238 1 1 7 135 4 32 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 275 0 275 275 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.998 0.850 0.892 0.865
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.995 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5075 0 1770 5085 1583 0 1653 0 1770 1611 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.985 0.751
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5075 0 1770 5085 1583 0 1637 0 1399 1611 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2 259 8 35
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 769 499 196 160
Travel Time (s) 10.5 6.8 4.5 3.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 39 1755 18 38 2553 259 1 1 8 147 4 35
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 39 1773 0 38 2553 259 0 10 0 147 39 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38822 66
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 11.2 90.0 11.0 89.8 89.8 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 8.6% 69.2% 8.5% 69.1% 69.1% 22.3% 22.3% 22.3% 22.3% Maximum Green (s) 7.2 85.1 7.0 84.9 84.9 24.1 24.1 24.1 24.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max Min Min Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
338
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0000 00
Act Effct Green (s) 6.9 92.3 7.4 92.8 92.8 18.4 18.4 18.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.71 0.06 0.71 0.71 0.14 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.49 0.38 0.70 0.22 0.04 0.74 0.15
Control Delay 58.1 5.1 69.9 13.3 1.4 26.6 74.9 17.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 58.1 5.1 69.9 13.3 1.4 26.6 74.9 17.4

LOS E A E B A C E B
Approach Delay 6.2 13.0 26.6 62.8
Approach LOS A B C E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 102 31 442 0 1 120 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) m63 112 70 569 29 18 188 35
Internal Link Dist (ft) 689 419 116 80
Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 275 275
Base Capacity (vph) 98 3602 104 3630 1204 309 259 327
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.49 0.37 0.70 0.22 0.03 0.57 0.12 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 78 (60%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave
339
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 39 1773 38 2553 259 10 147 39
v/c Ratio 0.42 0.49 0.38 0.70 0.22 0.04 0.74 0.15
Control Delay 58.1 5.1 69.9 13.3 1.4 26.6 74.9 17.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 58.1 5.1 69.9 13.3 1.4 26.6 74.9 17.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 102 31 442 0 1 120 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) m63 112 70 569 29 18 188 35
Internal Link Dist (ft) 689 419 116 80
Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 275 275
Base Capacity (vph) 98 3602 104 3630 1204 309 259 327
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.49 0.37 0.70 0.22 0.03 0.57 0.12 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 340
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 53 8 106 246 8 285 63 909 581 251 1357 52 Future Volume (vph) 53 8 106 246 8 285 63 909 581 251 1357 52 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 125 0 220 0 160 120 220 150
Storage Lanes 2 0 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.861 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3047 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3047 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 109 254 514 117
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 664 821 1246 864
Travel Time (s) 15.1 18.7 17.0 11.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 58 9 115 267 9 310 68 988 632 273 1475 57 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 124 0 267 9 310 68 988 632 273 1475 57 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 10.0 23.0 21.0 34.0 34.0 10.0 64.0 64.0 22.0 76.0 76.0 Total Split (%) 7.7% 17.7% 16.2% 26.2% 26.2% 7.7% 49.2% 49.2% 16.9% 58.5% 58.5% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 18.1 17.0 29.1 29.1 6.0 59.1 59.1 18.0 71.1 71.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
341
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.1 6.5 12.0 15.0 15.0 6.2 29.2 29.2 12.2 37.8 37.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.16 0.48 0.48 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.35 0.51 0.03 0.61 0.25 0.52 0.69 0.51 0.60 0.07 Control Delay 41.8 14.5 36.4 32.4 14.0 42.2 20.4 8.8 36.3 16.5 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.8 14.5 36.4 32.4 14.0 42.2 20.4 8.8 36.3 16.5 0.2

LOS D B D C B D C A D B A
Approach Delay 23.2 24.5 16.9 19.0
Approach LOS C C B B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 3 59 4 23 15 128 37 60 187 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 40 34 126 19 120 45 210 165 128 272 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 584 741 1166 784
Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 220 160 120 220 150
Base Capacity (vph) 272 813 773 718 766 272 3981 1351 818 4531 1423 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.15 0.35 0.01 0.40 0.25 0.25 0.47 0.33 0.33 0.04 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 78.5
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69
Intersection Signal Delay: 19.1 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
342
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 124 267 9 310 68 988 632 273 1475 57 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.35 0.51 0.03 0.61 0.25 0.52 0.69 0.51 0.60 0.07 Control Delay 41.8 14.5 36.4 32.4 14.0 42.2 20.4 8.8 36.3 16.5 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.8 14.5 36.4 32.4 14.0 42.2 20.4 8.8 36.3 16.5 0.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 3 59 4 23 15 128 37 60 187 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 40 34 126 19 120 45 210 165 128 272 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 584 741 1166 784
Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 220 160 120 220 150
Base Capacity (vph) 272 813 773 718 766 272 3981 1351 818 4531 1423 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.15 0.35 0.01 0.40 0.25 0.25 0.47 0.33 0.33 0.04 Intersection Summary
343
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 38 2 25 15 4 39 49 1638 96 104 1750 81 Future Volume (vph) 38 2 25 15 4 39 49 1638 96 104 1750 81 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 95 0 100 80 150 0 160 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.860 0.850 0.992 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1602 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3511 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1602 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3511 0 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 27 117 8 83
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 192 345 539 695
Travel Time (s) 4.4 7.8 7.4 9.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 41 2 27 16 4 42 53 1780 104 113 1902 88 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 41 29 0 16 4 42 53 1884 0 113 1902 88 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 10.0 23.0 9.9 22.9 22.9 10.6 81.1 16.0 86.5 86.5 Total Split (%) 7.7% 17.7% 7.6% 17.6% 17.6% 8.2% 62.4% 12.3% 66.5% 66.5% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 18.1 5.9 18.0 18.0 6.6 76.2 12.0 81.6 81.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
344
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.2 10.4 6.1 6.5 6.5 6.7 67.4 11.2 76.7 76.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.10 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.65 0.11 0.74 0.74 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.20 0.46 0.82 0.59 0.73 0.07 Control Delay 65.0 22.6 57.3 53.2 2.2 66.9 19.2 62.9 13.5 1.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0
Total Delay 65.0 22.6 57.3 53.2 2.2 66.9 19.2 62.9 14.0 1.8

LOS E C E D A E B E B A
Approach Delay 47.4 19.7 20.5 16.1
Approach LOS D B C B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 1 11 3 0 38 525 80 453 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) #71 32 36 15 0 #94 680 #161 591 17 Internal Link Dist (ft) 112 265 459 615
Turn Bay Length (ft) 95 100 80 150 160
Base Capacity (vph) 108 317 106 341 385 119 2593 216 2747 1247 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 393 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.09 0.15 0.01 0.11 0.45 0.73 0.52 0.81 0.07 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 103.7
Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82
Intersection Signal Delay: 18.7 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
345
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 41 29 16 4 42 53 1884 113 1902 88 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.20 0.46 0.82 0.59 0.73 0.07 Control Delay 65.0 22.6 57.3 53.2 2.2 66.9 19.2 62.9 13.5 1.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0
Total Delay 65.0 22.6 57.3 53.2 2.2 66.9 19.2 62.9 14.0 1.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 1 11 3 0 38 525 80 453 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) #71 32 36 15 0 #94 680 #161 591 17 Internal Link Dist (ft) 112 265 459 615
Turn Bay Length (ft) 95 100 80 150 160
Base Capacity (vph) 108 317 106 341 385 119 2593 216 2747 1247 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 393 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.09 0.15 0.01 0.11 0.45 0.73 0.52 0.81 0.07 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
346
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 328 1817 185 161 2190 389 226 577 145 113 346 170 Future Volume (vph) 328 1817 185 161 2190 389 226 577 145 113 346 170 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 180 1000 155 250 220 215 140
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3467 5136 1599 3467 5136 1599 3467 3574 1599 3467 3574 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3463 5136 1547 3460 5136 1547 3427 3574 1542 3439 3574 1540 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 136 170 148 185
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 2628 2617 1029 627
Travel Time (s) 35.8 35.7 15.6 9.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4444
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Adj. Flow (vph) 357 1975 201 175 2380 423 246 627 158 123 376 185 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 357 1975 201 175 2380 423 246 627 158 123 376 185 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 19.0 74.5 74.5 15.5 71.0 71.0 16.1 30.0 30.0 10.0 23.9 23.9 Total Split (%) 14.6% 57.3% 57.3% 11.9% 54.6% 54.6% 12.4% 23.1% 23.1% 7.7% 18.4% 18.4% Maximum Green (s) 15.0 69.6 69.6 11.5 66.1 66.1 12.1 25.1 25.1 6.0 19.0 19.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead 347
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 15.0 69.7 69.7 11.5 66.2 66.2 13.4 24.7 24.7 6.3 17.6 17.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.54 0.54 0.09 0.51 0.51 0.10 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.72 0.23 0.57 0.91 0.49 0.69 0.92 0.38 0.73 0.78 0.50 Control Delay 81.5 24.6 6.0 41.3 13.2 3.6 67.4 71.9 11.2 85.4 65.9 11.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 81.5 24.6 6.0 41.3 13.2 3.6 67.4 71.9 11.2 85.4 65.9 11.9

LOS F C A D B A E E B F E B
Approach Delay 31.2 13.5 61.5 54.8
Approach LOS C B E D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 155 444 26 68 92 2 106 274 7 54 161 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #242 501 66 m85 385 m56 #164 #382 68 #105 217 69 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2548 2537 949 547
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 180 1000 155 250 220 215 140
Base Capacity (vph) 400 2752 892 306 2614 871 357 690 417 168 522 383 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.89 0.72 0.23 0.57 0.91 0.49 0.69 0.91 0.38 0.73 0.72 0.48 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 68 (52%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.92
Intersection Signal Delay: 30.5 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
348
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 357 1975 201 175 2380 423 246 627 158 123 376 185 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.72 0.23 0.57 0.91 0.49 0.69 0.92 0.38 0.73 0.78 0.50 Control Delay 81.5 24.6 6.0 41.3 13.2 3.6 67.4 71.9 11.2 85.4 65.9 11.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 81.5 24.6 6.0 41.3 13.2 3.6 67.4 71.9 11.2 85.4 65.9 11.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 155 444 26 68 92 2 106 274 7 54 161 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #242 501 66 m85 385 m56 #164 #382 68 #105 217 69 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2548 2537 949 547
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 180 1000 155 250 220 215 140
Base Capacity (vph) 400 2752 892 306 2614 871 357 690 417 168 522 383 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.89 0.72 0.23 0.57 0.91 0.49 0.69 0.91 0.38 0.73 0.72 0.48 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 349
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 256 1804 28 16 2410 359 86 55 39 186 22 242 Future Volume (vph) 256 1804 28 16 2410 359 86 55 39 186 22 242 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 0 140 140
Storage Lanes 2 1 1 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.938 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3467 5136 1599 1787 5136 1599 3467 1752 0 3467 1881 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3467 5136 1559 1787 5136 1575 3460 1752 0 3461 1881 1572 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 83 194 22 161
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 2617 2634 984 1312
Travel Time (s) 35.7 35.9 16.8 22.4
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2222
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Adj. Flow (vph) 278 1961 30 17 2620 390 93 60 42 202 24 263 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 278 1961 30 17 2620 390 93 102 0 202 24 263 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 17.0 83.2 83.2 9.9 76.1 76.1 10.0 22.9 14.0 26.9 26.9 Total Split (%) 13.1% 64.0% 64.0% 7.6% 58.5% 58.5% 7.7% 17.6% 10.8% 20.7% 20.7% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 78.3 78.3 5.9 71.2 71.2 6.0 18.0 10.0 22.0 22.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag 350
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 13.0 90.1 90.1 6.3 77.4 77.4 6.0 11.9 9.9 15.8 15.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.69 0.69 0.05 0.60 0.60 0.05 0.09 0.08 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.55 0.03 0.20 0.86 0.38 0.58 0.57 0.77 0.10 0.79 Control Delay 51.5 7.2 0.1 78.6 9.5 0.8 75.7 55.3 77.9 49.3 38.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.5 7.2 0.1 78.6 9.5 0.8 75.7 55.3 77.9 49.3 38.3

LOS D A A E A A E E E D D
Approach Delay 12.6 8.7 65.0 55.2
Approach LOS BAEE
Queue Length 50th (ft) 117 125 0 14 219 3 40 66 87 18 85 Queue Length 95th (ft) #181 176 m0 m14 m848 m11 70 120 #144 43 177 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2537 2554 904 1232
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 140 140
Base Capacity (vph) 346 3559 1106 87 3056 1015 160 261 266 318 399 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.80 0.55 0.03 0.20 0.86 0.38 0.58 0.39 0.76 0.08 0.66 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 61 (47%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86
Intersection Signal Delay: 15.8 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
351
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 278 1961 30 17 2620 390 93 102 202 24 263 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.55 0.03 0.20 0.86 0.38 0.58 0.57 0.77 0.10 0.79 Control Delay 51.5 7.2 0.1 78.6 9.5 0.8 75.7 55.3 77.9 49.3 38.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.5 7.2 0.1 78.6 9.5 0.8 75.7 55.3 77.9 49.3 38.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 117 125 0 14 219 3 40 66 87 18 85 Queue Length 95th (ft) #181 176 m0 m14 m848 m11 70 120 #144 43 177 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2537 2554 904 1232
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 140 140
Base Capacity (vph) 346 3559 1106 87 3056 1015 160 261 266 318 399 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.80 0.55 0.03 0.20 0.86 0.38 0.58 0.39 0.76 0.08 0.66 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 352
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 111 2621 218 100 1835 90 158 426 85 243 343 229 Future Volume (vph) 111 2621 218 100 1835 90 158 426 85 243 343 229 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 0 250 250
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 134 90 135 135
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 2634 1941 956 651
Travel Time (s) 35.9 26.5 21.7 14.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 121 2849 237 109 1995 98 172 463 92 264 373 249 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 2849 237 109 1995 98 172 463 92 264 373 249 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 10.5 65.1 65.1 9.9 64.5 64.5 16.1 32.0 32.0 13.0 28.9 28.9 Total Split (%) 8.8% 54.3% 54.3% 8.3% 53.8% 53.8% 13.4% 26.7% 26.7% 10.8% 24.1% 24.1% Maximum Green (s) 6.5 60.2 60.2 5.9 59.6 59.6 12.1 27.1 27.1 9.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
353
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.5 60.2 60.2 5.9 59.6 59.6 12.1 27.1 27.1 9.0 24.0 24.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.50 0.50 0.05 0.50 0.50 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.20 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.65 1.12 0.28 0.65 0.79 0.12 0.97 1.10 0.20 1.03 1.00 0.59 Control Delay 68.9 75.3 2.7 62.1 23.7 7.6 113.3 118.0 2.9 117.6 95.6 25.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.9 75.3 2.7 62.1 23.7 7.6 113.3 118.0 2.9 117.6 95.6 25.7

LOS E E A E C A F F A F F C
Approach Delay 69.7 24.9 102.3 82.5
Approach LOS E C F F
Queue Length 50th (ft) 46 ~930 33 39 286 8 135 ~407 0 ~112 ~292 78 Queue Length 95th (ft) m52 m#1012 m34 m57 332 m25 #277 #614 15 #199 #493 167 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2554 1861 876 571
Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 185 2550 860 168 2525 831 178 420 462 257 372 424 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 1.12 0.28 0.65 0.79 0.12 0.97 1.10 0.20 1.03 1.00 0.59 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 106 (88%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.12
Intersection Signal Delay: 60.7 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
354
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 2849 237 109 1995 98 172 463 92 264 373 249 v/c Ratio 0.65 1.12 0.28 0.65 0.79 0.12 0.97 1.10 0.20 1.03 1.00 0.59 Control Delay 68.9 75.3 2.7 62.1 23.7 7.6 113.3 118.0 2.9 117.6 95.6 25.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.9 75.3 2.7 62.1 23.7 7.6 113.3 118.0 2.9 117.6 95.6 25.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 46 ~930 33 39 286 8 135 ~407 0 ~112 ~292 78 Queue Length 95th (ft) m52 m#1012 m34 m57 332 m25 #277 #614 15 #199 #493 167 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2554 1861 876 571
Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 185 2550 860 168 2525 831 178 420 462 257 372 424 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 1.12 0.28 0.65 0.79 0.12 0.97 1.10 0.20 1.03 1.00 0.59 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 355
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2403 596 0 1750 284 0 2053 248 0 1514 280 Future Volume (vph) 0 2403 596 0 1750 284 0 2053 248 0 1514 280 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 225 275 150 325 215 265 265
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 17 17 17 17
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1941 1380 695 1246
Travel Time (s) 26.5 18.8 9.5 17.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2612 648 0 1902 309 0 2232 270 0 1646 304 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2612 648 0 1902 309 0 2232 270 0 1646 304 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm
Protected Phases 4826
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Total Split (%) 54.2% 54.2% 54.2% 54.2% 45.8% 45.8% 45.8% 45.8% Maximum Green (s) 60.1 60.1 60.1 60.1 50.1 50.1 50.1 50.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Min Min Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
356
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 60.1 60.1 60.1 60.1 50.1 50.1 50.1 50.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 v/c Ratio 1.03 0.81 0.75 0.39 1.05 0.40 0.78 0.45
Control Delay 29.6 13.2 7.8 5.7 51.3 14.5 33.2 26.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Delay 29.6 13.2 7.8 5.7 51.3 14.5 33.4 26.3

LOS C B A A D B C C
Approach Delay 26.3 7.5 47.3 32.3
Approach LOS C A D C
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~418 142 105 37 ~683 84 395 157
Queue Length 95th (ft) m210 m121 138 m64 m#669 m71 457 239 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1861 1300 615 1166
Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 150 215 265
Base Capacity (vph) 2546 801 2546 801 2122 670 2122 670 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.03 0.81 0.75 0.39 1.05 0.40 0.80 0.45 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.05
Intersection Signal Delay: 28.6 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
357
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBT NBR SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 2612 648 1902 309 2232 270 1646 304 v/c Ratio 1.03 0.81 0.75 0.39 1.05 0.40 0.78 0.45
Control Delay 29.6 13.2 7.8 5.7 51.3 14.5 33.2 26.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Delay 29.6 13.2 7.8 5.7 51.3 14.5 33.4 26.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~418 142 105 37 ~683 84 395 157
Queue Length 95th (ft) m210 m121 138 m64 m#669 m71 457 239 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1861 1300 615 1166
Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 150 215 265
Base Capacity (vph) 2546 801 2546 801 2122 670 2122 670 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.03 0.81 0.75 0.39 1.05 0.40 0.80 0.45 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 358
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 742 1936 1321 597 493 708
Future Volume (vph) 742 1936 1321 597 493 708
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 215 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 2 2 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.97 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 2787 3433 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 2787 3433 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 555 770
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1361 790
Travel Time (s) 18.8 18.6 18.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 807 2104 1436 649 536 770
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 807 2104 1436 649 536 770
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 748866
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 41.0 89.0 48.0 48.0 31.0 31.0
Total Split (%) 34.2% 74.2% 40.0% 40.0% 25.8% 25.8%
Maximum Green (s) 37.0 84.1 43.1 43.1 26.1 26.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
359
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 00000
Act Effct Green (s) 37.0 86.1 45.1 45.1 24.1 24.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.72 0.38 0.38 0.20 0.20
v/c Ratio 0.76 0.58 0.75 0.47 0.78 0.66
Control Delay 17.5 2.5 25.4 5.8 53.7 5.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 17.5 2.5 25.4 5.8 53.7 5.7

LOS B A C A D A
Approach Delay 6.7 19.3 25.4
Approach LOS A B C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 212 60 303 26 200 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) m211 m58 390 90 262 53
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1281 710
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215
Base Capacity (vph) 1058 3646 1909 1393 746 1208
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.76 0.58 0.75 0.47 0.72 0.64
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 96 (80%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78
Intersection Signal Delay: 14.7 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
360
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 807 2104 1436 649 536 770
v/c Ratio 0.76 0.58 0.75 0.47 0.78 0.66
Control Delay 17.5 2.5 25.4 5.8 53.7 5.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 17.5 2.5 25.4 5.8 53.7 5.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 212 60 303 26 200 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) m211 m58 390 90 262 53
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1281 710
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215
Base Capacity (vph) 1058 3646 1909 1393 746 1208
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.76 0.58 0.75 0.47 0.72 0.64
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 361
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2117 305 0 1764 418 0 92 0 0 501 149 Future Volume (vph) 0 2117 305 0 1764 418 0 92 0 0 501 149 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 130 160 115 240 50 90 220
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 3539 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 0 3539 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 66 319 21
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1361 619 1143 926
Travel Time (s) 18.6 8.4 19.5 15.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2301 332 0 1917 454 0 100 0 0 545 162 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2301 332 0 1917 454 0 100 0 0 545 162 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0000
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 4826
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 84.0 84.0 84.0 84.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Total Split (%) 70.0% 70.0% 70.0% 70.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% Maximum Green (s) 79.1 79.1 79.1 79.1 31.1 31.1 31.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Min Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
362
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 85.5 85.5 85.5 85.5 24.7 24.7 24.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.21 0.21 0.21
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.29 0.53 0.37 0.14 0.75 0.47
Control Delay 8.9 4.0 5.6 1.6 37.9 51.1 40.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.9 4.0 5.6 1.7 37.9 51.1 40.0

LOS A A A A D D D
Approach Delay 8.3 4.9 37.9 48.6
Approach LOS A A D D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 338 51 118 7 33 210 97
Queue Length 95th (ft) 534 128 149 15 54 255 155
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1281 539 1063 846
Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 115 220
Base Capacity (vph) 3622 1146 3622 1219 917 917 425
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 313 181 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 35 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.64 0.29 0.58 0.44 0.11 0.59 0.38
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 82 (68%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.3 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
363
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 2301 332 1917 454 100 545 162
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.29 0.53 0.37 0.14 0.75 0.47
Control Delay 8.9 4.0 5.6 1.6 37.9 51.1 40.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.9 4.0 5.6 1.7 37.9 51.1 40.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 338 51 118 7 33 210 97
Queue Length 95th (ft) 534 128 149 15 54 255 155
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1281 539 1063 846
Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 115 220
Base Capacity (vph) 3622 1146 3622 1219 917 917 425
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 313 181 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 35 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.64 0.29 0.58 0.44 0.11 0.59 0.38
Intersection Summary
364
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 2077 40 135 1880 302 555
Future Volume (vph) 2077 40 135 1880 302 555
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 350 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 5085 1583 1770 5085 1770 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 5085 1583 1770 5085 1770 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 35 384
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30
Link Distance (ft) 619 1280 909
Travel Time (s) 8.4 17.5 20.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 2258 43 147 2043 328 603
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 2258 43 147 2043 328 603
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8 2
Permitted Phases 4 2
Detector Phase 443822
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 66.0 66.0 20.0 86.0 34.0 34.0
Total Split (%) 55.0% 55.0% 16.7% 71.7% 28.3% 28.3%
Maximum Green (s) 61.1 61.1 15.1 81.1 30.0 30.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None C-Max Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
365
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 64.6 64.6 15.1 84.6 26.5 26.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.13 0.70 0.22 0.22
v/c Ratio 0.82 0.05 0.66 0.57 0.84 0.66
Control Delay 10.0 1.6 44.6 2.9 63.8 18.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.0 1.6 44.6 2.9 63.8 18.1

LOS B A D A E B
Approach Delay 9.9 5.7 34.2
Approach LOS A A C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 100 1 105 40 240 82
Queue Length 95th (ft) 136 m1 m165 78 344 149
Internal Link Dist (ft) 539 1200 829
Turn Bay Length (ft) 350
Base Capacity (vph) 2739 868 222 3586 442 984
Starvation Cap Reductn 14 00000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.83 0.05 0.66 0.57 0.74 0.61
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 62 (52%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave
366
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 2258 43 147 2043 328 603
v/c Ratio 0.82 0.05 0.66 0.57 0.84 0.66
Control Delay 10.0 1.6 44.6 2.9 63.8 18.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.0 1.6 44.6 2.9 63.8 18.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 100 1 105 40 240 82
Queue Length 95th (ft) 136 m1 m165 78 344 149
Internal Link Dist (ft) 539 1200 829
Turn Bay Length (ft) 350
Base Capacity (vph) 2739 868 222 3586 442 984
Starvation Cap Reductn 14 00000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.83 0.05 0.66 0.57 0.74 0.61
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 367
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 171 2170 282 202 1639 346 264 320 135 303 280 120 Future Volume (vph) 171 2170 282 202 1639 346 264 320 135 303 280 120 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 0 160 160
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.956 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3383 0 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3383 0 3433 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 118 254 46 124
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1280 1261 1032 465
Travel Time (s) 17.5 17.2 15.6 7.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 176 2237 291 208 1690 357 272 330 139 312 289 124 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 176 2237 291 208 1690 357 272 469 0 312 289 124 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 15.2 64.0 64.0 14.0 62.8 62.8 16.4 24.0 18.0 25.6 25.6 Total Split (%) 12.7% 53.3% 53.3% 11.7% 52.3% 52.3% 13.7% 20.0% 15.0% 21.3% 21.3% Maximum Green (s) 11.2 59.1 59.1 10.0 57.9 57.9 12.4 19.1 14.0 20.7 20.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
368
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 11.1 60.3 60.3 9.9 59.1 59.1 16.8 18.2 13.8 15.2 15.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.50 0.50 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.14 0.15 0.12 0.13 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.87 0.34 0.74 0.67 0.39 0.57 0.85 0.79 0.65 0.40 Control Delay 44.1 15.2 3.2 51.0 14.9 3.8 53.8 59.6 67.1 56.3 11.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.1 15.2 3.2 51.0 14.9 3.8 53.8 59.6 67.1 56.3 11.8

LOS D B A D B A D E E E B
Approach Delay 15.8 16.5 57.5 53.3
Approach LOS B B E D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 71 228 4 82 130 18 101 168 122 113 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m91 343 m26 m#130 180 70 153 #245 #186 154 54 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1200 1181 952 385
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 320 2557 854 286 2506 909 480 577 403 610 375 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.87 0.34 0.73 0.67 0.39 0.57 0.81 0.77 0.47 0.33 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 70 (58%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87
Intersection Signal Delay: 25.1 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
369
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 176 2237 291 208 1690 357 272 469 312 289 124 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.87 0.34 0.74 0.67 0.39 0.57 0.85 0.79 0.65 0.40 Control Delay 44.1 15.2 3.2 51.0 14.9 3.8 53.8 59.6 67.1 56.3 11.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.1 15.2 3.2 51.0 14.9 3.8 53.8 59.6 67.1 56.3 11.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 71 228 4 82 130 18 101 168 122 113 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m91 343 m26 m#130 180 70 153 #245 #186 154 54 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1200 1181 952 385
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 320 2557 854 286 2506 909 480 577 403 610 375 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.87 0.34 0.73 0.67 0.39 0.57 0.81 0.77 0.47 0.33 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 370
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
7: Minneawa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM HCM 6th TWSC 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 17.3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2582 145 0 2188 0 192
Future Vol, veh/h 2582 145 0 2188 0 192
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 2662 149 0 2256 0 198
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 1406
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Critical Hdwy - ---- 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -----
Follow-up Hdwy - ---- 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 ~ 110
Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - ~ 110
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----
Stage 1 - -----
Stage 2 - -----
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 $ 460.2

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 110 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.799 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) $ 460.2 - - -
HCM Lane LOS F - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 15.7 - - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 371
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 88 2675 11 27 2148 266 16 2 29 141 1 24 Future Volume (vph) 88 2675 11 27 2148 266 16 2 29 141 1 24 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 275 0 275 275 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.850 0.917 0.856
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.983 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 1583 0 1679 0 1770 1595 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.907 0.782
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 1583 0 1549 0 1457 1595 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 277 30 25
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 769 499 196 160
Travel Time (s) 10.5 6.8 4.5 3.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 92 2786 11 28 2238 277 17 2 30 147 1 25 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 92 2797 0 28 2238 277 0 49 0 147 26 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38822 66
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 16.9 83.0 10.2 76.3 76.3 26.8 26.8 26.8 26.8 Total Split (%) 14.1% 69.2% 8.5% 63.6% 63.6% 22.3% 22.3% 22.3% 22.3% Maximum Green (s) 12.9 78.1 6.2 71.4 71.4 21.9 21.9 21.9 21.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max Min Min Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
372
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0000 00
Act Effct Green (s) 12.9 86.6 6.6 76.4 76.4 16.9 16.9 16.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.72 0.06 0.64 0.64 0.14 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.76 0.29 0.69 0.25 0.20 0.72 0.11
Control Delay 40.2 5.2 62.0 16.2 1.8 23.7 67.9 16.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 40.2 5.2 62.0 16.2 1.8 23.7 67.9 16.8

LOS D A E B A C E B
Approach Delay 6.3 15.1 23.7 60.2
Approach LOS A B C E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 61 106 21 387 0 13 110 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) m77 195 53 491 34 48 175 26
Internal Link Dist (ft) 689 419 116 80
Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 275 275
Base Capacity (vph) 190 3666 99 3236 1108 307 265 311
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.76 0.28 0.69 0.25 0.16 0.55 0.08 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 72 (60%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.1 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave
373
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 92 2797 28 2238 277 49 147 26
v/c Ratio 0.48 0.76 0.29 0.69 0.25 0.20 0.72 0.11
Control Delay 40.2 5.2 62.0 16.2 1.8 23.7 67.9 16.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 40.2 5.2 62.0 16.2 1.8 23.7 67.9 16.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 61 106 21 387 0 13 110 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) m77 195 53 491 34 48 175 26
Internal Link Dist (ft) 689 419 116 80
Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 275 275
Base Capacity (vph) 190 3666 99 3236 1108 307 265 311
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.76 0.28 0.69 0.25 0.16 0.55 0.08 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 374
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 146 15 123 419 27 666 196 1257 69 377 1100 85 Future Volume (vph) 146 15 123 419 27 666 196 1257 69 377 1100 85 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 125 0 220 0 160 120 220 150
Storage Lanes 2 0 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.866 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3065 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3065 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 134 325 124 132
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 664 821 1246 864
Travel Time (s) 15.1 18.7 17.0 11.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 159 16 134 455 29 724 213 1366 75 410 1196 92 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 159 150 0 455 29 724 213 1366 75 410 1196 92 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 11.2 33.3 28.9 51.0 51.0 17.8 45.8 45.8 22.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 8.6% 25.6% 22.2% 39.2% 39.2% 13.7% 35.2% 35.2% 16.9% 38.5% 38.5% Maximum Green (s) 7.2 28.4 24.9 46.1 46.1 13.8 40.9 40.9 18.0 45.1 45.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
375
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 7.5 6.9 44.4 43.7 43.7 18.5 43.2 43.2 17.8 42.4 42.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.05 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.14 0.33 0.33 0.14 0.33 0.33 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.52 0.39 0.05 0.97 0.44 0.81 0.12 0.87 0.72 0.15 Control Delay 88.2 19.3 33.5 27.9 49.2 55.0 44.8 1.1 75.0 41.7 2.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 88.2 19.3 33.5 27.9 49.2 55.0 44.8 1.1 75.0 41.7 2.1

LOS F B C C D E D A E D A
Approach Delay 54.7 42.8 44.2 47.6
Approach LOS DDDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 69 6 144 16 373 85 394 0 176 335 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #131 41 199 38 #645 131 457 6 #261 367 15 Internal Link Dist (ft) 584 741 1166 784
Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 220 160 120 220 150
Base Capacity (vph) 199 774 1171 660 771 489 1687 608 477 1784 641 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.80 0.19 0.39 0.04 0.94 0.44 0.81 0.12 0.86 0.67 0.14 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.97
Intersection Signal Delay: 45.7 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
376
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 159 150 455 29 724 213 1366 75 410 1196 92 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.52 0.39 0.05 0.97 0.44 0.81 0.12 0.87 0.72 0.15 Control Delay 88.2 19.3 33.5 27.9 49.2 55.0 44.8 1.1 75.0 41.7 2.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 88.2 19.3 33.5 27.9 49.2 55.0 44.8 1.1 75.0 41.7 2.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 69 6 144 16 373 85 394 0 176 335 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #131 41 199 38 #645 131 457 6 #261 367 15 Internal Link Dist (ft) 584 741 1166 784
Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 220 160 120 220 150
Base Capacity (vph) 199 774 1171 660 771 489 1687 608 477 1784 641 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.80 0.19 0.39 0.04 0.94 0.44 0.81 0.12 0.86 0.67 0.14 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
377
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 174 14 118 44 15 116 95 2011 21 155 1913 42 Future Volume (vph) 174 14 118 44 15 116 95 2011 21 155 1913 42 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 95 0 100 80 150 0 160 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.866 0.850 0.998 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1613 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3532 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1613 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3532 0 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 109 1 135
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 192 345 539 695
Travel Time (s) 4.4 7.8 7.4 9.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 185 15 126 47 16 123 101 2139 22 165 2035 45 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 185 141 0 47 16 123 101 2161 0 165 2035 45 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 15.0 25.2 12.7 22.9 22.9 11.2 68.1 14.0 70.9 70.9 Total Split (%) 12.5% 21.0% 10.6% 19.1% 19.1% 9.3% 56.8% 11.7% 59.1% 59.1% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 20.3 8.7 18.0 18.0 7.2 63.2 10.0 66.0 66.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Min None C-Min C-Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
378
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 11.0 11.0 10.0 8.2 8.2 7.2 73.0 10.0 75.8 75.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.61 0.08 0.63 0.63 v/c Ratio 1.14 0.54 0.32 0.13 0.59 0.95 1.01 1.12 0.91 0.04 Control Delay 162.5 19.6 56.9 52.6 24.3 132.0 44.8 138.1 16.0 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 162.5 19.6 56.9 52.6 24.3 132.0 80.8 138.1 16.0 0.0

LOS F B E D C F F F B A
Approach Delay 100.7 35.0 83.1 24.7
Approach LOS F C F C
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~167 11 35 12 11 79 802 ~149 226 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #316 73 74 34 68 #193 #1134 m#225 #998 m0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 112 265 459 615
Turn Bay Length (ft) 95 100 80 150 160
Base Capacity (vph) 162 378 157 279 330 106 2150 147 2236 1049 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 6 0 229 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.14 0.37 0.30 0.06 0.38 0.95 1.12 1.12 0.91 0.04 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 116 (97%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.14
Intersection Signal Delay: 56.3 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
379
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 185 141 47 16 123 101 2161 165 2035 45 v/c Ratio 1.14 0.54 0.32 0.13 0.59 0.95 1.01 1.12 0.91 0.04 Control Delay 162.5 19.6 56.9 52.6 24.3 132.0 44.8 138.1 16.0 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 162.5 19.6 56.9 52.6 24.3 132.0 80.8 138.1 16.0 0.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~167 11 35 12 11 79 802 ~149 226 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #316 73 74 34 68 #193 #1134 m#225 #998 m0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 112 265 459 615
Turn Bay Length (ft) 95 100 80 150 160
Base Capacity (vph) 162 378 157 279 330 106 2150 147 2236 1049 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 6 0 229 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.14 0.37 0.30 0.06 0.38 0.95 1.12 1.12 0.91 0.04 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 380
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 333 2157 397 291 1812 197 226 594 260 402 699 324 Future Volume (vph) 333 2157 397 291 1812 197 226 594 260 402 699 324 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 180 250 155 250 220 215 140
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.99 0.95 0.98 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3467 5136 1599 3467 5136 1599 3467 3574 1599 3467 3574 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3450 5136 1513 3457 5136 1513 3415 3574 1512 3406 3574 1513 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 227 135 179 210
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 2590 2649 1021 649
Travel Time (s) 35.3 36.1 15.5 9.8
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Adj. Flow (vph) 354 2295 422 310 1928 210 240 632 277 428 744 345 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 354 2295 422 310 1928 210 240 632 277 428 744 345 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 17.3 59.6 59.6 15.2 57.5 57.5 13.3 26.1 26.1 19.1 31.9 31.9 Total Split (%) 14.4% 49.7% 49.7% 12.7% 47.9% 47.9% 11.1% 21.8% 21.8% 15.9% 26.6% 26.6% Maximum Green (s) 13.3 54.7 54.7 11.2 52.6 52.6 9.3 21.2 21.2 15.1 27.0 27.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead 381
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 13.3 54.7 54.7 11.2 52.6 52.6 9.3 21.2 21.2 15.1 27.0 27.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.46 0.46 0.09 0.44 0.44 0.08 0.18 0.18 0.13 0.22 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.98 0.52 0.96 0.86 0.28 0.89 1.00 0.67 0.98 0.93 0.69 Control Delay 83.0 46.9 12.6 88.8 37.2 15.5 88.3 85.7 25.3 91.3 64.0 24.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 83.0 46.9 12.6 88.8 37.2 15.5 88.3 85.7 25.3 91.3 64.0 24.0

LOS F D B F D B F F C F E C
Approach Delay 46.3 41.9 71.7 62.6
Approach LOS D D E E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 142 626 98 114 329 36 96 ~261 68 172 298 95 Queue Length 95th (ft) #232 #757 191 m#211 448 m99 #172 #387 167 #278 #414 205 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2510 2569 941 569
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 180 250 155 250 220 215 140
Base Capacity (vph) 384 2341 813 323 2251 739 269 631 414 436 804 503 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.98 0.52 0.96 0.86 0.28 0.89 1.00 0.67 0.98 0.93 0.69 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 20 (17%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00
Intersection Signal Delay: 51.6 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
382
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 354 2295 422 310 1928 210 240 632 277 428 744 345 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.98 0.52 0.96 0.86 0.28 0.89 1.00 0.67 0.98 0.93 0.69 Control Delay 83.0 46.9 12.6 88.8 37.2 15.5 88.3 85.7 25.3 91.3 64.0 24.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 83.0 46.9 12.6 88.8 37.2 15.5 88.3 85.7 25.3 91.3 64.0 24.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 142 626 98 114 329 36 96 ~261 68 172 298 95 Queue Length 95th (ft) #232 #757 191 m#211 448 m99 #172 #387 167 #278 #414 205 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2510 2569 941 569
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 180 250 155 250 220 215 140
Base Capacity (vph) 384 2341 813 323 2251 739 269 631 414 436 804 503 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.98 0.52 0.96 0.86 0.28 0.89 1.00 0.67 0.98 0.93 0.69 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 383
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 228 2528 85 47 1898 242 54 41 41 383 96 344 Future Volume (vph) 228 2528 85 47 1898 242 54 41 41 383 96 344 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 0 140 140
Storage Lanes 2 1 1 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.925 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3467 5136 1599 1787 5136 1599 3467 1725 0 3467 1881 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3466 5136 1555 1787 5136 1573 3455 1725 0 3455 1881 1572 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 159 35 180
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 2649 2634 1000 1305
Travel Time (s) 36.1 35.9 17.0 22.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Adj. Flow (vph) 243 2689 90 50 2019 257 57 44 44 407 102 366 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 243 2689 90 50 2019 257 57 88 0 407 102 366 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 15.1 68.8 68.8 9.9 63.6 63.6 9.9 22.9 18.4 31.4 31.4 Total Split (%) 12.6% 57.3% 57.3% 8.3% 53.0% 53.0% 8.3% 19.1% 15.3% 26.2% 26.2% Maximum Green (s) 11.1 63.9 63.9 5.9 58.7 58.7 5.9 18.0 14.4 26.5 26.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag 384
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 11.1 70.4 70.4 6.8 64.1 64.1 5.8 12.6 14.4 23.1 23.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.59 0.59 0.06 0.53 0.53 0.05 0.10 0.12 0.19 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.89 0.09 0.50 0.74 0.28 0.34 0.42 0.98 0.28 0.82 Control Delay 38.0 7.7 0.1 75.4 9.9 1.0 60.9 35.8 91.9 43.1 38.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 38.0 7.7 0.1 75.4 9.9 1.0 60.9 35.8 91.9 43.1 38.7

LOS D A A E A A E D F D D
Approach Delay 9.9 10.4 45.7 64.0
Approach LOS A B D E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 89 161 0 33 330 2 22 38 164 69 146 Queue Length 95th (ft) m96 m#212 m1 m48 m426 m9 45 87 #267 117 256 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2569 2554 920 1225
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 140 140
Base Capacity (vph) 320 3011 963 101 2744 914 170 288 416 415 487 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.76 0.89 0.09 0.50 0.74 0.28 0.34 0.31 0.98 0.25 0.75 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 39 (33%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98
Intersection Signal Delay: 18.3 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
385
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/15/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 243 2689 90 50 2019 257 57 88 407 102 366 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.89 0.09 0.50 0.74 0.28 0.34 0.42 0.98 0.28 0.82 Control Delay 38.0 7.7 0.1 75.4 9.9 1.0 60.9 35.8 91.9 43.1 38.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 38.0 7.7 0.1 75.4 9.9 1.0 60.9 35.8 91.9 43.1 38.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 89 161 0 33 330 2 22 38 164 69 146 Queue Length 95th (ft) m96 m#212 m1 m48 m426 m9 45 87 #267 117 256 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2569 2554 920 1225
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 140 140
Base Capacity (vph) 320 3011 963 101 2744 914 170 288 416 415 487 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.76 0.89 0.09 0.50 0.74 0.28 0.34 0.31 0.98 0.25 0.75 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 386
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

HERNDON AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY
Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections
387
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 171 1687 170 117 2415 216 179 286 75 144 305 199 Future Volume (vph) 171 1687 170 117 2415 216 179 286 75 144 305 199 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 0 250 250
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 141 122 115 154
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 2634 1941 956 651
Travel Time (s) 35.9 26.5 21.7 14.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 186 1834 185 127 2625 235 195 311 82 157 332 216 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 1834 185 127 2625 235 195 311 82 157 332 216 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 12.2 76.1 76.1 13.9 77.8 77.8 20.0 37.1 37.1 12.9 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 8.7% 54.4% 54.4% 9.9% 55.6% 55.6% 14.3% 26.5% 26.5% 9.2% 21.4% 21.4% Maximum Green (s) 8.2 71.2 71.2 9.9 72.9 72.9 16.0 32.2 32.2 8.9 25.1 25.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
388
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 8.2 71.8 71.8 9.3 72.9 72.9 16.0 32.2 32.2 8.9 25.1 25.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.51 0.51 0.07 0.52 0.52 0.11 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.70 0.21 0.56 0.99 0.27 0.97 0.73 0.18 0.72 0.99 0.53 Control Delay 105.1 26.6 9.0 87.8 23.4 5.1 115.9 60.9 3.6 83.0 104.6 21.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 105.1 26.6 9.0 87.8 23.4 5.1 115.9 60.9 3.6 83.0 104.6 21.1

LOS F C A F C A F E A F F C
Approach Delay 31.7 24.7 71.1 74.2
Approach LOS C C E E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 88 403 48 63 361 21 180 264 0 73 306 49 Queue Length 95th (ft) #162 543 114 m57 m205 m17 #338 374 19 #123 #508 134 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2554 1861 876 571
Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 201 2607 880 242 2647 882 202 428 452 218 334 410 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.93 0.70 0.21 0.52 0.99 0.27 0.97 0.73 0.18 0.72 0.99 0.53 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 14 (10%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 130
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99
Intersection Signal Delay: 36.7 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
389
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 1834 185 127 2625 235 195 311 82 157 332 216 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.70 0.21 0.56 0.99 0.27 0.97 0.73 0.18 0.72 0.99 0.53 Control Delay 105.1 26.6 9.0 87.8 23.4 5.1 115.9 60.9 3.6 83.0 104.6 21.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 105.1 26.6 9.0 87.8 23.4 5.1 115.9 60.9 3.6 83.0 104.6 21.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 88 403 48 63 361 21 180 264 0 73 306 49 Queue Length 95th (ft) #162 543 114 m57 m205 m17 #338 374 19 #123 #508 134 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2554 1861 876 571
Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 201 2607 880 242 2647 882 202 428 452 218 334 410 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.93 0.70 0.21 0.52 0.99 0.27 0.97 0.73 0.18 0.72 0.99 0.53 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 390
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 205 1270 430 234 1956 163 554 1047 115 196 1281 263 Future Volume (vph) 205 1270 430 234 1956 163 554 1047 115 196 1281 263 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 225 275 150 325 215 265 265
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 234 122 116 154
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1941 1380 695 1246
Travel Time (s) 26.5 18.8 9.5 17.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 223 1380 467 254 2126 177 602 1138 125 213 1392 286 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 223 1380 467 254 2126 177 602 1138 125 213 1392 286 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 12.0 50.6 50.6 15.4 54.0 54.0 24.0 55.6 55.6 18.4 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 8.6% 36.1% 36.1% 11.0% 38.6% 38.6% 17.1% 39.7% 39.7% 13.1% 35.7% 35.7% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 45.7 45.7 11.4 49.1 49.1 20.0 50.7 50.7 14.4 45.1 45.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
391
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 8.0 45.7 45.7 11.4 49.1 49.1 20.0 50.7 50.7 14.4 45.1 45.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.33 0.33 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.14 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 1.14 0.83 0.69 0.91 1.19 0.28 1.23 0.62 0.19 0.60 1.22 0.47 Control Delay 144.4 36.6 18.6 89.4 116.3 4.3 168.5 38.5 6.9 67.9 148.2 19.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 144.4 36.6 18.6 89.4 116.3 4.3 168.5 38.5 6.9 67.9 148.2 19.5

LOS F D B F F A F D A E F B
Approach Delay 44.2 105.9 78.3 119.7
Approach LOS D F E F
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~117 224 91 111 ~861 34 ~347 310 5 97 ~817 92 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#205 310 182 #200 #935 49 #468 361 49 141 #957 179 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1861 1300 615 1166
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 225 275 150 325 215 265 265
Base Capacity (vph) 196 1659 674 279 1783 634 490 1841 647 353 1140 614 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.14 0.83 0.69 0.91 1.19 0.28 1.23 0.62 0.19 0.60 1.22 0.47 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 140
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.23
Intersection Signal Delay: 87.6 Intersection LOS: F
Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.7% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
392
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 223 1380 467 254 2126 177 602 1138 125 213 1392 286 v/c Ratio 1.14 0.83 0.69 0.91 1.19 0.28 1.23 0.62 0.19 0.60 1.22 0.47 Control Delay 144.4 36.6 18.6 89.4 116.3 4.3 168.5 38.5 6.9 67.9 148.2 19.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 144.4 36.6 18.6 89.4 116.3 4.3 168.5 38.5 6.9 67.9 148.2 19.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~117 224 91 111 ~861 34 ~347 310 5 97 ~817 92 Queue Length 95th (ft) m#205 310 182 #200 #935 49 #468 361 49 141 #957 179 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1861 1300 615 1166
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 225 275 150 325 215 265 265
Base Capacity (vph) 196 1659 674 279 1783 634 490 1841 647 353 1140 614 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.14 0.83 0.69 0.91 1.19 0.28 1.23 0.62 0.19 0.60 1.22 0.47 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 393
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 117 1469 2232 73 104 109
Future Volume (vph) 117 1469 2232 73 104 109
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 215 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 1583 3433 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 1583 3433 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 68 118
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1361 790
Travel Time (s) 18.8 18.6 18.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 127 1597 2426 79 113 118
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 1597 2426 79 113 118
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 16.0 116.0 100.0 100.0 24.0 24.0
Total Split (%) 11.4% 82.9% 71.4% 71.4% 17.1% 17.1%
Maximum Green (s) 12.0 111.1 95.1 95.1 19.1 19.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
394
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.5 120.2 105.7 105.7 10.0 10.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.86 0.76 0.76 0.07 0.07
v/c Ratio 0.49 0.37 0.63 0.07 0.46 0.38
Control Delay 40.0 6.0 1.1 0.1 68.3 13.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 40.0 6.0 1.1 0.1 68.3 13.7

LOS D A A A E B
Approach Delay 8.5 1.1 40.4
Approach LOS A A D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 61 178 10 0 52 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) m79 239 12 m0 83 34
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1281 710
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215
Base Capacity (vph) 301 4367 3840 1212 468 482
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.37 0.63 0.07 0.24 0.24
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 10 (7%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63
Intersection Signal Delay: 6.0 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
395
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 1597 2426 79 113 118
v/c Ratio 0.49 0.37 0.63 0.07 0.46 0.38
Control Delay 40.0 6.0 1.1 0.1 68.3 13.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 40.0 6.0 1.1 0.1 68.3 13.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 61 178 10 0 52 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) m79 239 12 m0 83 34
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1281 710
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215
Base Capacity (vph) 301 4367 3840 1212 468 482
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.37 0.63 0.07 0.24 0.24
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 396
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 106 1407 60 82 2106 160 75 94 48 174 133 136 Future Volume (vph) 106 1407 60 82 2106 160 75 94 48 174 133 136 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 130 160 115 240 50 90 220
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 122 115 122 148
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1361 619 1143 926
Travel Time (s) 18.6 8.4 19.5 15.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 115 1529 65 89 2289 174 82 102 52 189 145 148 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 115 1529 65 89 2289 174 82 102 52 189 145 148 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 17.0 75.5 75.5 17.6 76.1 76.1 17.0 22.9 22.9 24.0 29.9 29.9 Total Split (%) 12.1% 53.9% 53.9% 12.6% 54.4% 54.4% 12.1% 16.4% 16.4% 17.1% 21.4% 21.4% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 70.6 70.6 13.6 71.2 71.2 13.0 18.0 18.0 20.0 25.0 25.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
397
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 12.5 76.6 76.6 13.6 77.6 77.6 11.0 13.0 13.0 19.1 21.1 21.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.55 0.55 0.10 0.55 0.55 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.15 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.55 0.07 0.52 0.81 0.19 0.59 0.59 0.20 0.78 0.52 0.41 Control Delay 81.4 11.5 0.7 47.7 10.3 1.0 79.3 74.4 1.8 80.4 60.8 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 81.4 11.5 0.7 47.7 10.3 1.0 79.3 74.4 1.8 80.4 60.8 10.8

LOS F B A D B A E E A F E B
Approach Delay 15.8 11.0 60.1 53.1
Approach LOS B B E D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 80 351 1 80 175 4 73 91 0 167 123 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #186 350 7 m99 218 m9 130 148 0 #276 190 61 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1281 539 1063 846
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 130 160 115 240 50 90 220
Base Capacity (vph) 169 2780 920 171 2819 928 164 239 309 262 332 404 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.68 0.55 0.07 0.52 0.81 0.19 0.50 0.43 0.17 0.72 0.44 0.37 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 86 (61%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81
Intersection Signal Delay: 19.0 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
398
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 115 1529 65 89 2289 174 82 102 52 189 145 148 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.55 0.07 0.52 0.81 0.19 0.59 0.59 0.20 0.78 0.52 0.41 Control Delay 81.4 11.5 0.7 47.7 10.3 1.0 79.3 74.4 1.8 80.4 60.8 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 81.4 11.5 0.7 47.7 10.3 1.0 79.3 74.4 1.8 80.4 60.8 10.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 80 351 1 80 175 4 73 91 0 167 123 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #186 350 7 m99 218 m9 130 148 0 #276 190 61 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1281 539 1063 846
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 130 160 115 240 50 90 220
Base Capacity (vph) 169 2780 920 171 2819 928 164 239 309 262 332 404 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.68 0.55 0.07 0.52 0.81 0.19 0.50 0.43 0.17 0.72 0.44 0.37 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 399
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM HCM 6th TWSC 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1583 46 60 2348 0 27
Future Vol, veh/h 1583 46 60 2348 0 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 350 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1721 50 65 2552 0 29
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1771 0 - 886
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - 5.34 - - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.12 - - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 163 - 0 247
Stage 1 - - - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 163 - - 247
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1 21.5

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 247 - - 163 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.119 - - 0.4 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 21.5 - - 41.1 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - E -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - 1.8 -
400
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 108 1240 262 113 2018 256 257 235 157 281 316 133 Future Volume (vph) 108 1240 262 113 2018 256 257 235 157 281 316 133 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 0 160 160
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.940 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3327 0 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3327 0 3433 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 172 142 98 115
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1280 1261 1032 465
Travel Time (s) 17.5 17.2 15.6 7.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 117 1348 285 123 2193 278 279 255 171 305 343 145 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 117 1348 285 123 2193 278 279 426 0 305 343 145 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 13.0 77.3 77.3 13.7 78.0 78.0 22.0 26.0 23.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 9.3% 55.2% 55.2% 9.8% 55.7% 55.7% 15.7% 18.6% 16.4% 19.3% 19.3% Maximum Green (s) 9.0 72.4 72.4 9.7 73.1 73.1 18.0 21.1 19.0 22.1 22.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
401
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 77.5 77.5 9.3 77.8 77.8 16.7 18.5 16.9 18.7 18.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.55 0.55 0.07 0.56 0.56 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.48 0.30 0.54 0.78 0.29 0.68 0.81 0.74 0.73 0.47 Control Delay 48.6 2.3 1.0 87.4 14.2 1.9 67.9 58.0 70.4 67.3 19.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.6 2.3 1.0 87.4 14.2 1.9 67.9 58.0 70.4 67.3 19.7

LOS D A A F B A E E E E B
Approach Delay 5.2 16.3 61.9 59.8
Approach LOS A B E E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 60 8 51 509 12 125 155 139 160 24 Queue Length 95th (ft) m90 43 7 m77 269 22 175 214 189 209 90 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1200 1181 952 385
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 220 2815 953 241 2826 943 445 584 465 558 346 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.53 0.48 0.30 0.51 0.78 0.29 0.63 0.73 0.66 0.61 0.42 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 90 (64%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.4 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
402
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 117 1348 285 123 2193 278 279 426 305 343 145 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.48 0.30 0.54 0.78 0.29 0.68 0.81 0.74 0.73 0.47 Control Delay 48.6 2.3 1.0 87.4 14.2 1.9 67.9 58.0 70.4 67.3 19.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.6 2.3 1.0 87.4 14.2 1.9 67.9 58.0 70.4 67.3 19.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 60 8 51 509 12 125 155 139 160 24 Queue Length 95th (ft) m90 43 7 m77 269 22 175 214 189 209 90 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1200 1181 952 385
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 220 2815 953 241 2826 943 445 584 465 558 346 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.53 0.48 0.30 0.51 0.78 0.29 0.63 0.73 0.66 0.61 0.42 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 403
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
7: Minneawa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM HCM 6th TWSC 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1584 123 0 2382 0 84
Future Vol, veh/h 1584 123 0 2382 0 84
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1722 134 0 2589 0 91
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 928
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 232
Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 232
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 30.2

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 232 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.394 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 30.2 - - -
HCM Lane LOS D - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 - - -
404
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 36 1615 17 35 2349 238 1 1 7 135 4 32 Future Volume (vph) 36 1615 17 35 2349 238 1 1 7 135 4 32 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 275 0 275 275 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.998 0.850 0.892 0.865
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.995 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5075 0 1770 5085 1583 0 1653 0 1770 1611 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.985 0.751
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5075 0 1770 5085 1583 0 1637 0 1399 1611 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2 245 8 35
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 769 499 196 160
Travel Time (s) 10.5 6.8 4.5 3.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 39 1755 18 38 2553 259 1 1 8 147 4 35
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 39 1773 0 38 2553 259 0 10 0 147 39 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 13.0 97.0 12.0 96.0 96.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 9.3% 69.3% 8.6% 68.6% 68.6% 22.1% 22.1% 22.1% 22.1% Maximum Green (s) 9.0 92.1 8.0 91.1 91.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max Min Min Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
405
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 8.3 100.8 7.7 100.2 100.2 19.6 19.6 19.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.72 0.06 0.72 0.72 0.14 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.49 0.39 0.70 0.22 0.04 0.75 0.15
Control Delay 64.3 9.4 75.1 14.1 1.7 27.8 80.4 18.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 64.3 9.4 75.1 14.1 1.7 27.8 80.4 18.5

LOS E A E B A C F B
Approach Delay 10.5 13.8 27.8 67.4
Approach LOS B B C E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 31 161 34 479 4 2 130 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) m64 282 73 617 35 18 199 36
Internal Link Dist (ft) 689 419 116 80
Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 275 275
Base Capacity (vph) 113 3653 106 3639 1202 311 260 328
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.49 0.36 0.70 0.22 0.03 0.57 0.12 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 80 (57%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75
Intersection Signal Delay: 14.7 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave
406
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 39 1773 38 2553 259 10 147 39
v/c Ratio 0.38 0.49 0.39 0.70 0.22 0.04 0.75 0.15
Control Delay 64.3 9.4 75.1 14.1 1.7 27.8 80.4 18.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 64.3 9.4 75.1 14.1 1.7 27.8 80.4 18.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 31 161 34 479 4 2 130 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) m64 282 73 617 35 18 199 36
Internal Link Dist (ft) 689 419 116 80
Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 275 275
Base Capacity (vph) 113 3653 106 3639 1202 311 260 328
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.49 0.36 0.70 0.22 0.03 0.57 0.12 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 407
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 53 8 106 12 8 80 63 1114 27 55 1553 52 Future Volume (vph) 53 8 106 12 8 80 63 1114 27 55 1553 52 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 125 0 220 0 160 120 220 150
Storage Lanes 2 0 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.861 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3047 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3047 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 115 87 83 83
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 664 821 1246 864
Travel Time (s) 15.1 18.7 17.0 11.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 58 9 115 13 9 87 68 1211 29 60 1688 57
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 124 0 13 9 87 68 1211 29 60 1688 57 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 12.0 27.0 11.0 26.0 26.0 13.0 80.0 80.0 12.0 79.0 79.0 Total Split (%) 9.2% 20.8% 8.5% 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 61.5% 61.5% 9.2% 60.8% 60.8% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 22.1 7.0 21.1 21.1 9.0 75.1 75.1 8.0 74.1 74.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
408
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 7.0 13.5 6.1 6.8 6.8 7.3 40.4 40.4 7.1 40.1 40.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.18 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.55 0.55 0.10 0.54 0.54 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.19 0.05 0.05 0.39 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.18 0.61 0.06 Control Delay 37.8 9.6 39.1 37.8 15.0 37.3 11.9 0.1 37.8 14.3 1.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.8 9.6 39.1 37.8 15.0 37.3 11.9 0.1 37.8 14.3 1.3

LOS D A D D B D B A D B A
Approach Delay 18.6 19.7 13.0 14.7
Approach LOS B B B B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 1 3 4 0 15 126 0 13 202 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 37 29 13 20 45 41 185 0 38 294 10 Internal Link Dist (ft) 584 741 1166 784
Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 220 160 120 220 150
Base Capacity (vph) 391 1040 342 561 537 441 4759 1487 391 4728 1478 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.12 0.04 0.02 0.16 0.15 0.25 0.02 0.15 0.36 0.04 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 74.1
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.61
Intersection Signal Delay: 14.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
409
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 124 13 9 87 68 1211 29 60 1688 57 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.19 0.05 0.05 0.39 0.20 0.44 0.03 0.18 0.61 0.06 Control Delay 37.8 9.6 39.1 37.8 15.0 37.3 11.9 0.1 37.8 14.3 1.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.8 9.6 39.1 37.8 15.0 37.3 11.9 0.1 37.8 14.3 1.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 1 3 4 0 15 126 0 13 202 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 37 29 13 20 45 41 185 0 38 294 10 Internal Link Dist (ft) 584 741 1166 784
Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 220 160 120 220 150
Base Capacity (vph) 391 1040 342 561 537 441 4759 1487 391 4728 1478 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.12 0.04 0.02 0.16 0.15 0.25 0.02 0.15 0.36 0.04 Intersection Summary
410
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 38 2 25 15 4 39 49 1638 96 104 1750 81 Future Volume (vph) 38 2 25 15 4 39 49 1638 96 104 1750 81 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 95 0 100 80 150 0 160 76
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.860 0.850 0.992 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1602 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3511 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1602 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3511 0 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 27 117 8 83
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 192 345 539 695
Travel Time (s) 4.4 7.8 7.4 9.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 41 2 27 16 4 42 53 1780 104 113 1902 88 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 41 29 0 16 4 42 53 1884 0 113 1902 88 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 10.0 23.0 9.9 22.9 22.9 10.6 81.1 16.0 86.5 86.5 Total Split (%) 7.7% 17.7% 7.6% 17.6% 17.6% 8.2% 62.4% 12.3% 66.5% 66.5% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 18.1 5.9 18.0 18.0 6.6 76.2 12.0 81.6 81.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
411
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.2 10.4 6.1 6.5 6.5 6.7 67.4 11.2 76.7 76.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.10 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.65 0.11 0.74 0.74 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.20 0.46 0.82 0.59 0.73 0.07 Control Delay 65.0 22.6 57.3 53.2 2.2 66.9 19.2 62.9 13.5 1.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0
Total Delay 65.0 22.6 57.3 53.2 2.2 66.9 19.2 62.9 14.0 1.8

LOS E C E D A E B E B A
Approach Delay 47.4 19.7 20.5 16.1
Approach LOS D B C B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 1 11 3 0 38 525 80 453 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) #71 32 36 15 0 #94 680 #161 591 17 Internal Link Dist (ft) 112 265 459 615
Turn Bay Length (ft) 95 100 80 150 160 76
Base Capacity (vph) 108 317 106 341 385 119 2593 216 2747 1247 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 393 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.09 0.15 0.01 0.11 0.45 0.73 0.52 0.81 0.07 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 103.7
Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82
Intersection Signal Delay: 18.7 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
412
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 41 29 16 4 42 53 1884 113 1902 88 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.20 0.46 0.82 0.59 0.73 0.07 Control Delay 65.0 22.6 57.3 53.2 2.2 66.9 19.2 62.9 13.5 1.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0
Total Delay 65.0 22.6 57.3 53.2 2.2 66.9 19.2 62.9 14.0 1.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 1 11 3 0 38 525 80 453 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) #71 32 36 15 0 #94 680 #161 591 17 Internal Link Dist (ft) 112 265 459 615
Turn Bay Length (ft) 95 100 80 150 160 76
Base Capacity (vph) 108 317 106 341 385 119 2593 216 2747 1247 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 393 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.09 0.15 0.01 0.11 0.45 0.73 0.52 0.81 0.07 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
413
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 328 1817 185 161 2190 389 226 577 145 113 346 170 Future Volume (vph) 328 1817 185 161 2190 389 226 577 145 113 346 170 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 180 250 155 250 220 215 140
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3467 5136 1599 3467 5136 1599 3467 3574 1599 3467 3574 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3463 5136 1544 3459 5136 1544 3424 3574 1540 3437 3574 1538 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 172 149 185
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 2640 2645 1240 608
Travel Time (s) 36.0 36.1 18.8 9.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 4 4 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Adj. Flow (vph) 357 1975 201 175 2380 423 246 627 158 123 376 185 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 357 1975 201 175 2380 423 246 627 158 123 376 185 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 21.0 79.6 79.6 16.4 75.0 75.0 16.9 33.0 33.0 11.0 27.1 27.1 Total Split (%) 15.0% 56.9% 56.9% 11.7% 53.6% 53.6% 12.1% 23.6% 23.6% 7.9% 19.4% 19.4% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 74.7 74.7 12.4 70.1 70.1 12.9 28.1 28.1 7.0 22.2 22.2 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag 414
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 16.7 75.5 75.5 12.4 71.2 71.2 12.6 27.3 27.3 7.0 21.7 21.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.54 0.54 0.09 0.51 0.51 0.09 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.16 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.71 0.23 0.57 0.91 0.49 0.79 0.90 0.38 0.71 0.68 0.47 Control Delay 81.6 26.1 7.1 42.4 14.0 1.9 80.6 71.8 11.0 87.4 62.7 11.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 81.6 26.1 7.1 42.4 14.0 1.9 80.6 71.8 11.0 87.4 62.7 11.0

LOS F C A D B A F E B F E B
Approach Delay 32.4 13.9 64.6 53.1
Approach LOS C B E D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 166 484 32 75 478 12 114 294 7 57 171 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #246 540 75 m92 535 m11 #174 #391 69 #104 228 69 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2560 2565 1160 528
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 180 250 155 250 220 215 140
Base Capacity (vph) 420 2769 890 307 2613 869 319 717 428 173 566 399 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.85 0.71 0.23 0.57 0.91 0.49 0.77 0.87 0.37 0.71 0.66 0.46 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 68 (49%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91
Intersection Signal Delay: 31.4 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
415
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 357 1975 201 175 2380 423 246 627 158 123 376 185 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.71 0.23 0.57 0.91 0.49 0.79 0.90 0.38 0.71 0.68 0.47 Control Delay 81.6 26.1 7.1 42.4 14.0 1.9 80.6 71.8 11.0 87.4 62.7 11.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 81.6 26.1 7.1 42.4 14.0 1.9 80.6 71.8 11.0 87.4 62.7 11.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 166 484 32 75 478 12 114 294 7 57 171 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #246 540 75 m92 535 m11 #174 #391 69 #104 228 69 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2560 2565 1160 528
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 180 250 155 250 220 215 140
Base Capacity (vph) 420 2769 890 307 2613 869 319 717 428 173 566 399 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.85 0.71 0.23 0.57 0.91 0.49 0.77 0.87 0.37 0.71 0.66 0.46 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 416
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 256 1804 28 16 2410 359 86 55 39 186 22 242 Future Volume (vph) 256 1804 28 16 2410 359 86 55 39 186 22 242 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 0 140 140
Storage Lanes 2 1 1 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.938 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3467 5136 1599 1787 5136 1599 3467 1765 0 3467 1881 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3467 5136 1599 1787 5136 1599 3467 1765 0 3467 1881 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 77 187 21 160
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 2645 2634 921 1304
Travel Time (s) 36.1 35.9 15.7 22.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Adj. Flow (vph) 278 1961 30 17 2620 390 93 60 42 202 24 263 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 278 1961 30 17 2620 390 93 102 0 202 24 263 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 18.3 92.2 92.2 9.9 83.8 83.8 10.1 22.9 15.0 27.8 27.8 Total Split (%) 13.1% 65.9% 65.9% 7.1% 59.9% 59.9% 7.2% 16.4% 10.7% 19.9% 19.9% Maximum Green (s) 14.3 87.3 87.3 5.9 78.9 78.9 6.1 18.0 11.0 22.9 22.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min None Min Min 417
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 14.3 97.9 97.9 6.0 83.5 83.5 9.5 11.8 12.6 14.9 14.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.70 0.70 0.04 0.60 0.60 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.55 0.03 0.22 0.86 0.38 0.40 0.61 0.65 0.12 0.84 Control Delay 57.9 10.8 0.9 92.9 3.7 0.4 68.4 63.4 71.8 54.3 46.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 57.9 10.8 0.9 92.9 3.7 0.4 68.4 63.4 71.8 54.3 46.1

LOS E B A F A A E E E D D
Approach Delay 16.5 3.7 65.8 57.1
Approach LOS B A E E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 113 185 0 16 80 2 42 72 92 20 94 Queue Length 95th (ft) #186 303 m1 m17 m109 m3 #78 130 137 47 188 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2565 2554 841 1224
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 140 140
Base Capacity (vph) 354 3589 1140 77 3063 1029 235 245 316 307 395 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.79 0.55 0.03 0.22 0.86 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.64 0.08 0.67 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 50 (36%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86
Intersection Signal Delay: 15.0 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
418
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 278 1961 30 17 2620 390 93 102 202 24 263 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.55 0.03 0.22 0.86 0.38 0.40 0.61 0.65 0.12 0.84 Control Delay 57.9 10.8 0.9 92.9 3.7 0.4 68.4 63.4 71.8 54.3 46.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 57.9 10.8 0.9 92.9 3.7 0.4 68.4 63.4 71.8 54.3 46.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 113 185 0 16 80 2 42 72 92 20 94 Queue Length 95th (ft) #186 303 m1 m17 m109 m3 #78 130 137 47 188 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2565 2554 841 1224
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 140 140
Base Capacity (vph) 354 3589 1140 77 3063 1029 235 245 316 307 395 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.79 0.55 0.03 0.22 0.86 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.64 0.08 0.67 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 419
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 111 2621 218 100 1835 90 158 426 85 243 343 229 Future Volume (vph) 111 2621 218 100 1835 90 158 426 85 243 343 229 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 0 250 250
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 116 80 109 125
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 2634 1941 956 651
Travel Time (s) 35.9 26.5 21.7 14.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 121 2849 237 109 1995 98 172 463 92 264 373 249 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 2849 237 109 1995 98 172 463 92 264 373 249 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 13.9 83.9 83.9 9.9 79.9 79.9 18.7 39.0 39.0 15.2 35.5 35.5 Total Split (%) 9.4% 56.7% 56.7% 6.7% 54.0% 54.0% 12.6% 26.4% 26.4% 10.3% 24.0% 24.0% Maximum Green (s) 9.9 79.0 79.0 5.9 75.0 75.0 14.7 34.1 34.1 11.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
420
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.9 79.0 79.0 5.9 75.0 75.0 14.7 34.1 34.1 11.2 30.6 30.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.53 0.53 0.04 0.51 0.51 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.21 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.53 1.05 0.26 0.80 0.77 0.12 0.98 1.08 0.21 1.02 0.97 0.58 Control Delay 55.6 47.2 4.4 63.3 38.0 8.0 128.8 118.8 6.1 126.7 96.3 31.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.6 47.2 4.4 63.3 38.0 8.0 128.8 118.8 6.1 126.7 96.3 31.9

LOS E D A E D A F F A F F C
Approach Delay 44.4 37.9 106.9 87.2
Approach LOS D D F F
Queue Length 50th (ft) 56 ~1078 16 50 643 33 169 ~497 0 ~138 361 108 Queue Length 95th (ft) m65 #1159 m34 m57 m653 m34 #324 #719 34 #232 #569 204 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2554 1861 876 571
Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 229 2714 899 136 2576 841 175 429 448 259 385 426 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.53 1.05 0.26 0.80 0.77 0.12 0.98 1.08 0.21 1.02 0.97 0.58 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 148
Actuated Cycle Length: 148
Offset: 109 (74%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.08
Intersection Signal Delay: 54.2 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
421
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 2849 237 109 1995 98 172 463 92 264 373 249 v/c Ratio 0.53 1.05 0.26 0.80 0.77 0.12 0.98 1.08 0.21 1.02 0.97 0.58 Control Delay 55.6 47.2 4.4 63.3 38.0 8.0 128.8 118.8 6.1 126.7 96.3 31.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.6 47.2 4.4 63.3 38.0 8.0 128.8 118.8 6.1 126.7 96.3 31.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 56 ~1078 16 50 643 33 169 ~497 0 ~138 361 108 Queue Length 95th (ft) m65 #1159 m34 m57 m653 m34 #324 #719 34 #232 #569 204 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2554 1861 876 571
Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 220 280 200 225 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 229 2714 899 136 2576 841 175 429 448 259 385 426 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.53 1.05 0.26 0.80 0.77 0.12 0.98 1.08 0.21 1.02 0.97 0.58 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 422
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 482 1921 596 351 1292 284 458 1595 248 246 1163 280 Future Volume (vph) 482 1921 596 351 1292 284 458 1595 248 246 1163 280 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 225 275 150 325 215 265 265
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 203 147 152 186
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1941 1380 695 1246
Travel Time (s) 26.5 18.8 9.5 17.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 524 2088 648 382 1404 309 498 1734 270 267 1264 304 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 524 2088 648 382 1404 309 498 1734 270 267 1264 304 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 26.5 58.0 58.0 18.0 49.5 49.5 22.0 56.1 56.1 15.9 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 17.9% 39.2% 39.2% 12.2% 33.4% 33.4% 14.9% 37.9% 37.9% 10.7% 33.8% 33.8% Maximum Green (s) 22.5 53.1 53.1 14.0 44.6 44.6 18.0 51.2 51.2 11.9 45.1 45.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
423
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 22.5 53.1 53.1 14.0 44.6 44.6 18.0 51.2 51.2 11.9 45.1 45.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.36 0.36 0.09 0.30 0.30 0.12 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.30 0.30 v/c Ratio 1.01 1.14 0.93 1.18 0.92 0.53 1.19 0.99 0.42 0.97 1.17 0.50 Control Delay 68.6 88.1 16.7 152.1 49.0 22.6 162.2 66.1 17.6 113.2 132.6 18.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.6 88.1 16.7 152.1 49.0 22.6 162.2 66.5 17.6 113.2 132.6 18.7

LOS E F B F D C F E B F F B
Approach Delay 70.8 63.9 80.3 110.9
Approach LOS E E F F
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~255 ~850 417 ~231 521 140 ~298 607 82 135 ~763 89 Queue Length 95th (ft) m242 m#789 m364 #328 #453 166 #414 #722 164 #228 #903 184 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1861 1300 615 1166
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 225 275 150 325 215 265 265
Base Capacity (vph) 521 1824 698 324 1532 579 417 1759 647 276 1078 611 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.01 1.14 0.93 1.18 0.92 0.53 1.19 0.99 0.42 0.97 1.17 0.50 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 148
Actuated Cycle Length: 148
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.19
Intersection Signal Delay: 79.3 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
424
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 524 2088 648 382 1404 309 498 1734 270 267 1264 304 v/c Ratio 1.01 1.14 0.93 1.18 0.92 0.53 1.19 0.99 0.42 0.97 1.17 0.50 Control Delay 68.6 88.1 16.7 152.1 49.0 22.6 162.2 66.1 17.6 113.2 132.6 18.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.6 88.1 16.7 152.1 49.0 22.6 162.2 66.5 17.6 113.2 132.6 18.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~255 ~850 417 ~231 521 140 ~298 607 82 135 ~763 89 Queue Length 95th (ft) m242 m#789 m364 #328 #453 166 #414 #722 164 #228 #903 184 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1861 1300 615 1166
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 225 275 150 325 215 265 265
Base Capacity (vph) 521 1824 698 324 1532 579 417 1759 647 276 1078 611 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.01 1.14 0.93 1.18 0.92 0.53 1.19 0.99 0.42 0.97 1.17 0.50 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 425
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 260 2182 1672 246 247 250
Future Volume (vph) 260 2182 1672 246 247 250
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 215 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 1583 3433 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 1583 3433 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 267 272
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1361 790
Travel Time (s) 18.8 18.6 18.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 283 2372 1817 267 268 272
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 283 2372 1817 267 268 272
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 13.0 51.1 38.1 38.1 22.9 22.9
Total Split (%) 17.6% 69.1% 51.5% 51.5% 30.9% 30.9%
Maximum Green (s) 9.0 46.2 33.2 33.2 18.0 18.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
426
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.9 53.0 38.1 38.1 11.2 11.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.72 0.51 0.51 0.15 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.56 0.65 0.69 0.28 0.52 0.42
Control Delay 36.5 7.7 13.6 4.9 32.0 5.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 36.5 7.7 13.6 4.9 32.0 5.8

LOS D A B A C A
Approach Delay 10.7 12.4 18.8
Approach LOS B B B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 122 223 264 31 59 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) m109 m175 363 m88 88 31
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1281 710
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215
Base Capacity (vph) 511 3640 2618 944 835 883
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.65 0.69 0.28 0.32 0.31
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 74
Actuated Cycle Length: 74
Offset: 5 (7%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
427
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 283 2372 1817 267 268 272
v/c Ratio 0.56 0.65 0.69 0.28 0.52 0.42
Control Delay 36.5 7.7 13.6 4.9 32.0 5.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 36.5 7.7 13.6 4.9 32.0 5.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 122 223 264 31 59 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) m109 m175 363 m88 88 31
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1281 710
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215
Base Capacity (vph) 511 3640 2618 944 835 883
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.65 0.69 0.28 0.32 0.31
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 428
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 173 2117 132 88 1635 245 129 92 121 343 158 149 Future Volume (vph) 173 2117 132 88 1635 245 129 92 121 343 158 149 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 130 160 115 240 50 90 220
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 109 102 139 162
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1361 619 1143 926
Travel Time (s) 18.6 8.4 19.5 15.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 188 2301 143 96 1777 266 140 100 132 373 172 162 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 188 2301 143 96 1777 266 140 100 132 373 172 162 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 24.1 75.1 75.1 13.0 64.0 64.0 24.5 22.9 22.9 37.0 35.4 35.4 Total Split (%) 16.3% 50.7% 50.7% 8.8% 43.2% 43.2% 16.6% 15.5% 15.5% 25.0% 23.9% 23.9% Maximum Green (s) 20.1 70.2 70.2 9.0 59.1 59.1 20.5 18.0 18.0 33.0 30.5 30.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
429
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 19.5 75.5 75.5 9.0 64.9 64.9 16.4 13.2 13.2 32.5 29.3 29.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.51 0.51 0.06 0.44 0.44 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.22 0.20 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.89 0.17 0.90 0.80 0.35 0.71 0.60 0.49 0.96 0.47 0.37 Control Delay 71.9 25.5 3.1 109.1 25.1 10.6 82.7 79.4 14.5 93.4 57.1 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 71.9 25.5 3.1 109.1 25.1 10.6 82.7 79.4 14.5 93.4 57.1 9.2

LOS E C A F C B F E B F E A
Approach Delay 27.6 27.1 57.6 65.3
Approach LOS C C E E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 156 639 16 90 234 24 132 95 0 358 148 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #295 #677 44 m#201 530 100 203 154 57 #560 224 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1281 539 1063 846
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 130 160 115 240 50 90 220
Base Capacity (vph) 250 2593 860 107 2231 751 245 226 314 394 383 454 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.89 0.17 0.90 0.80 0.35 0.57 0.44 0.42 0.95 0.45 0.36 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 148
Actuated Cycle Length: 148
Offset: 74 (50%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 130
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96
Intersection Signal Delay: 33.9 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
430
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 188 2301 143 96 1777 266 140 100 132 373 172 162 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.89 0.17 0.90 0.80 0.35 0.71 0.60 0.49 0.96 0.47 0.37 Control Delay 71.9 25.5 3.1 109.1 25.1 10.6 82.7 79.4 14.5 93.4 57.1 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 71.9 25.5 3.1 109.1 25.1 10.6 82.7 79.4 14.5 93.4 57.1 9.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 156 639 16 90 234 24 132 95 0 358 148 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #295 #677 44 m#201 530 100 203 154 57 #560 224 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1281 539 1063 846
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 130 160 115 240 50 90 220
Base Capacity (vph) 250 2593 860 107 2231 751 245 226 314 394 383 454 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.89 0.17 0.90 0.80 0.35 0.57 0.44 0.42 0.95 0.45 0.36 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 431
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM HCM 6th TWSC 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2541 40 47 1968 0 91
Future Vol, veh/h 2541 40 47 1968 0 91
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 350 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2762 43 51 2139 0 99
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 2805 0 - 1403
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - 5.34 - - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.12 - - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - ~ 48 - 0 111
Stage 1 - - - - 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - ~ 48 - - 111
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 6.6 129.6

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 111 - - ~ 48 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.891 - - 1.064 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 129.6 - - 284.5 -
HCM Lane LOS F - - F -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 5.4 - - 4.6 -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 432
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 171 2170 282 202 1639 346 264 320 135 303 280 120 Future Volume (vph) 171 2170 282 202 1639 346 264 320 135 303 280 120 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 0 160 160
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.956 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3383 0 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3383 0 3433 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 98 217 37 124
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1280 1261 1032 465
Travel Time (s) 17.5 17.2 15.6 7.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 176 2237 291 208 1690 357 272 330 139 312 289 124 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 176 2237 291 208 1690 357 272 469 0 312 289 124 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 16.9 80.0 80.0 17.0 80.1 80.1 22.2 29.0 22.0 28.8 28.8 Total Split (%) 11.4% 54.1% 54.1% 11.5% 54.1% 54.1% 15.0% 19.6% 14.9% 19.5% 19.5% Maximum Green (s) 12.9 75.1 75.1 13.0 75.2 75.2 18.2 24.1 18.0 23.9 23.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
433
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 12.3 78.2 78.2 12.4 78.3 78.3 22.1 22.6 17.0 17.5 17.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.53 0.53 0.08 0.53 0.53 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.83 0.33 0.72 0.63 0.38 0.53 0.86 0.79 0.69 0.42 Control Delay 57.6 12.0 4.8 61.1 12.6 2.8 62.6 71.9 79.0 71.2 13.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 57.6 12.0 4.8 61.1 12.6 2.8 62.6 71.9 79.0 71.2 13.3

LOS E B A E B A E E E E B
Approach Delay 14.2 15.5 68.5 64.7
Approach LOS B B E E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 92 156 19 102 122 23 124 215 152 143 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m104 250 m43 147 134 42 178 282 206 187 60 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1200 1181 952 385
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 299 2687 882 301 2690 940 511 581 417 571 359 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.83 0.33 0.69 0.63 0.38 0.53 0.81 0.75 0.51 0.35 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 148
Actuated Cycle Length: 148
Offset: 91 (61%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.6 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
434
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 176 2237 291 208 1690 357 272 469 312 289 124 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.83 0.33 0.72 0.63 0.38 0.53 0.86 0.79 0.69 0.42 Control Delay 57.6 12.0 4.8 61.1 12.6 2.8 62.6 71.9 79.0 71.2 13.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 57.6 12.0 4.8 61.1 12.6 2.8 62.6 71.9 79.0 71.2 13.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 92 156 19 102 122 23 124 215 152 143 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m104 250 m43 147 134 42 178 282 206 187 60 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1200 1181 952 385
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 115 270 165 225 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 299 2687 882 301 2690 940 511 581 417 571 359 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.83 0.33 0.69 0.63 0.38 0.53 0.81 0.75 0.51 0.35 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 435
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
7: Minneawa Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM HCM 6th TWSC 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 17.3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2582 145 0 2188 0 192
Future Vol, veh/h 2582 145 0 2188 0 192
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2662 149 0 2256 0 198
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 1406
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - - - - - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 ~ 110
Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 -
Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - ~ 110
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 $ 460.2

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 110 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.799 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) $ 460.2 - - -
HCM Lane LOS F - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 15.7 - - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 436
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 88 2675 11 27 2148 266 16 2 29 141 1 24 Future Volume (vph) 88 2675 11 27 2148 266 16 2 29 141 1 24 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 275 0 275 275 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.999 0.850 0.917 0.856
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.983 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 1583 0 1679 0 1770 1595 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.908 0.744
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 1583 0 1551 0 1386 1595 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 256 30 25
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 769 499 196 160
Travel Time (s) 10.5 6.8 4.5 3.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 92 2786 11 28 2238 277 17 2 30 147 1 25 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 92 2797 0 28 2238 277 0 49 0 147 26 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 20.0 105.0 11.0 96.0 96.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 13.5% 70.9% 7.4% 64.9% 64.9% 21.6% 21.6% 21.6% 21.6% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 100.1 7.0 91.1 91.1 27.1 27.1 27.1 27.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max Min Min Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
437
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 16.0 110.6 7.1 97.7 97.7 20.5 20.5 20.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.75 0.05 0.66 0.66 0.14 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.74 0.33 0.67 0.24 0.20 0.77 0.11
Control Delay 48.9 4.3 78.4 17.1 2.2 27.7 85.8 18.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 48.9 4.3 78.4 17.1 2.2 27.7 85.8 18.9

LOS D A E B A C F B
Approach Delay 5.7 16.2 27.7 75.8
Approach LOS A B C E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 80 155 27 454 7 16 138 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) m103 168 62 570 44 54 210 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 689 419 116 80
Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 275 275
Base Capacity (vph) 191 3795 89 3357 1132 308 253 312
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.74 0.31 0.67 0.24 0.16 0.58 0.08 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 148
Actuated Cycle Length: 148
Offset: 91 (61%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.8 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave
438
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 92 2797 28 2238 277 49 147 26
v/c Ratio 0.48 0.74 0.33 0.67 0.24 0.20 0.77 0.11
Control Delay 48.9 4.3 78.4 17.1 2.2 27.7 85.8 18.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 48.9 4.3 78.4 17.1 2.2 27.7 85.8 18.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 80 155 27 454 7 16 138 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) m103 168 62 570 44 54 210 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 689 419 116 80
Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 275 275
Base Capacity (vph) 191 3795 89 3357 1132 308 253 312
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.74 0.31 0.67 0.24 0.16 0.58 0.08 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 439
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 146 15 123 68 27 184 196 1739 69 131 1346 85 Future Volume (vph) 146 15 123 68 27 184 196 1739 69 131 1346 85 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 125 0 220 0 160 120 220 150
Storage Lanes 2 0 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.867 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3068 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3068 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 128 165 124 132
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 664 821 1246 864
Travel Time (s) 15.1 18.7 17.0 11.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 152 16 128 71 28 192 204 1811 72 136 1402 89 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 144 0 71 28 192 204 1811 72 136 1402 89 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 16.0 30.0 11.0 25.0 25.0 19.0 74.0 74.0 15.0 70.0 70.0 Total Split (%) 12.3% 23.1% 8.5% 19.2% 19.2% 14.6% 56.9% 56.9% 11.5% 53.8% 53.8% Maximum Green (s) 12.0 25.1 7.0 20.1 20.1 15.0 69.1 69.1 11.0 65.1 65.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
440
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.7 9.8 11.3 8.7 8.7 18.2 47.1 47.1 9.2 38.2 38.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.19 0.50 0.50 0.10 0.41 0.41 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.33 0.17 0.16 0.65 0.30 0.71 0.08 0.40 0.68 0.12 Control Delay 47.3 14.4 41.6 46.4 21.9 36.4 19.5 0.4 47.7 24.6 1.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.3 14.4 41.6 46.4 21.9 36.4 19.5 0.4 47.7 24.6 1.4

LOS D B D D C D B A D C A
Approach Delay 31.3 29.1 20.5 25.3
Approach LOS C C C C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 4 19 15 15 51 272 0 37 230 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 96 40 48 50 95 110 413 3 88 363 10 Internal Link Dist (ft) 584 741 1166 784
Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 220 160 120 220 150
Base Capacity (vph) 461 953 427 419 483 690 3917 1248 422 3704 1189 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.15 0.17 0.07 0.40 0.30 0.46 0.06 0.32 0.38 0.07 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 93.4
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71
Intersection Signal Delay: 23.6 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
441
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 144 71 28 192 204 1811 72 136 1402 89 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.33 0.17 0.16 0.65 0.30 0.71 0.08 0.40 0.68 0.12 Control Delay 47.3 14.4 41.6 46.4 21.9 36.4 19.5 0.4 47.7 24.6 1.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.3 14.4 41.6 46.4 21.9 36.4 19.5 0.4 47.7 24.6 1.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 4 19 15 15 51 272 0 37 230 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 96 40 48 50 95 110 413 3 88 363 10 Internal Link Dist (ft) 584 741 1166 784
Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 220 160 120 220 150
Base Capacity (vph) 461 953 427 419 483 690 3917 1248 422 3704 1189 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.15 0.17 0.07 0.40 0.30 0.46 0.06 0.32 0.38 0.07 Intersection Summary
442
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 174 14 118 44 15 116 95 2011 21 155 1913 42 Future Volume (vph) 174 14 118 44 15 116 95 2011 21 155 1913 42 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 95 0 100 80 150 0 160 76
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.866 0.850 0.998 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1613 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3532 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1613 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3532 0 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 108 1 83
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 192 345 539 695
Travel Time (s) 4.4 7.8 7.4 9.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 185 15 126 47 16 123 101 2139 22 165 2035 45 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 185 141 0 47 16 123 101 2161 0 165 2035 45 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 16.0 25.9 13.0 22.9 22.9 11.8 76.1 15.0 79.3 79.3 Total Split (%) 12.3% 19.9% 10.0% 17.6% 17.6% 9.1% 58.5% 11.5% 61.0% 61.0% Maximum Green (s) 12.0 21.0 9.0 18.0 18.0 7.8 71.2 11.0 74.4 74.4 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
443
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 11.2 10.6 7.9 7.9 7.8 71.2 11.0 74.5 74.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.59 0.09 0.62 0.62 v/c Ratio 1.05 0.53 0.30 0.13 0.60 0.88 1.03 1.02 0.93 0.04 Control Delay 132.7 19.7 56.5 54.3 25.7 112.7 52.9 130.1 29.6 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.4 0.0
Total Delay 132.7 19.7 56.5 54.3 25.7 112.7 52.9 130.1 63.0 0.5

LOS F B E D C F D F E A
Approach Delay 83.8 36.0 55.6 66.6
Approach LOS F D E E
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~152 11 34 12 11 78 ~922 ~129 670 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #319 75 77 35 72 #194 #1160 #289 #1004 3 Internal Link Dist (ft) 112 265 459 615
Turn Bay Length (ft) 95 100 80 150 160 76
Base Capacity (vph) 177 387 167 279 329 115 2097 162 2195 1013 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 297 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.05 0.36 0.28 0.06 0.37 0.88 1.03 1.02 1.07 0.04 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.05
Intersection Signal Delay: 61.7 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
444
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 185 141 47 16 123 101 2161 165 2035 45 v/c Ratio 1.05 0.53 0.30 0.13 0.60 0.88 1.03 1.02 0.93 0.04 Control Delay 132.7 19.7 56.5 54.3 25.7 112.7 52.9 130.1 29.6 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.4 0.0
Total Delay 132.7 19.7 56.5 54.3 25.7 112.7 52.9 130.1 63.0 0.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~152 11 34 12 11 78 ~922 ~129 670 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #319 75 77 35 72 #194 #1160 #289 #1004 3 Internal Link Dist (ft) 112 265 459 615
Turn Bay Length (ft) 95 100 80 150 160 76
Base Capacity (vph) 177 387 167 279 329 115 2097 162 2195 1013 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 297 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.05 0.36 0.28 0.06 0.37 0.88 1.03 1.02 1.07 0.04 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
445
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 333 2157 397 291 1812 197 226 594 260 402 699 324 Future Volume (vph) 333 2157 397 291 1812 197 226 594 260 402 699 324 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 180 250 155 250 220 215 140
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.94 1.00 0.94 0.98 0.94 0.98 0.94 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3467 5136 1599 3467 5136 1599 3467 3574 1599 3467 3574 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3446 5136 1498 3455 5136 1498 3403 3574 1497 3392 3574 1497 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 184 122 172 186
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 5280 2638 1538 625
Travel Time (s) 72.0 36.0 23.3 9.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Adj. Flow (vph) 354 2295 422 310 1928 210 240 632 277 428 744 345 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 354 2295 422 310 1928 210 240 632 277 428 744 345 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 23.4 72.6 72.6 19.1 68.3 68.3 16.1 32.1 32.1 24.2 40.2 40.2 Total Split (%) 15.8% 49.1% 49.1% 12.9% 46.1% 46.1% 10.9% 21.7% 21.7% 16.4% 27.2% 27.2% Maximum Green (s) 18.5 67.7 67.7 14.2 63.4 63.4 11.2 27.2 27.2 19.3 35.3 35.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag 446
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 18.5 67.7 67.7 14.2 63.4 63.4 11.2 27.2 27.2 19.3 35.3 35.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.43 0.43 0.08 0.18 0.18 0.13 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.98 0.54 0.93 0.88 0.30 0.92 0.96 0.67 0.95 0.87 0.69 Control Delay 78.8 53.2 18.2 91.4 27.5 5.3 104.7 86.6 29.4 94.2 66.4 31.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 78.8 53.2 18.2 91.4 27.5 5.3 104.7 86.6 29.4 94.2 66.4 31.1

LOS E D B F C A F F C F E C
Approach Delay 51.3 33.7 76.6 66.2
Approach LOS D C E E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 174 784 160 147 683 36 120 322 94 214 366 143 Queue Length 95th (ft) #246 #909 265 #246 742 m77 #204 #445 202 #319 #466 263 Internal Link Dist (ft) 5200 2558 1458 545
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 180 250 155 250 220 215 140
Base Capacity (vph) 433 2349 785 332 2200 711 262 656 415 452 852 498 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.82 0.98 0.54 0.93 0.88 0.30 0.92 0.96 0.67 0.95 0.87 0.69 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 148
Actuated Cycle Length: 148
Offset: 24 (16%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98
Intersection Signal Delay: 52.4 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
447
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 354 2295 422 310 1928 210 240 632 277 428 744 345 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.98 0.54 0.93 0.88 0.30 0.92 0.96 0.67 0.95 0.87 0.69 Control Delay 78.8 53.2 18.2 91.4 27.5 5.3 104.7 86.6 29.4 94.2 66.4 31.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 78.8 53.2 18.2 91.4 27.5 5.3 104.7 86.6 29.4 94.2 66.4 31.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 174 784 160 147 683 36 120 322 94 214 366 143 Queue Length 95th (ft) #246 #909 265 #246 742 m77 #204 #445 202 #319 #466 263 Internal Link Dist (ft) 5200 2558 1458 545
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 180 250 155 250 220 215 140
Base Capacity (vph) 433 2349 785 332 2200 711 262 656 415 452 852 498 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.82 0.98 0.54 0.93 0.88 0.30 0.92 0.96 0.67 0.95 0.87 0.69 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 448
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 228 2528 85 47 1898 242 54 41 41 383 96 344 Future Volume (vph) 228 2528 85 47 1898 242 54 41 41 383 96 344 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 0 140 140
Storage Lanes 2 1 1 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.925 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3467 5136 1599 1787 5136 1599 3467 1724 0 3467 1881 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3465 5136 1553 1787 5136 1571 3452 1724 0 3452 1881 1571 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 116 133 28 211
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 2638 2634 1018 1320
Travel Time (s) 36.0 35.9 17.4 22.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Adj. Flow (vph) 243 2689 90 50 2019 257 57 44 44 407 102 366 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 243 2689 90 50 2019 257 57 88 0 407 102 366 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 20.7 89.1 89.1 11.0 79.4 79.4 9.9 22.9 25.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 14.0% 60.2% 60.2% 7.4% 53.6% 53.6% 6.7% 15.5% 16.9% 25.7% 25.7% Maximum Green (s) 16.7 84.2 84.2 7.0 74.5 74.5 5.9 18.0 21.0 33.1 33.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead 449
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 14.9 87.1 87.1 6.8 77.0 77.0 5.9 18.0 20.3 34.4 34.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.59 0.59 0.05 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.12 0.14 0.23 0.23 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.89 0.09 0.61 0.76 0.29 0.42 0.38 0.86 0.23 0.69 Control Delay 80.5 12.0 0.2 67.9 14.2 4.7 78.7 45.6 80.0 48.5 29.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 80.5 12.0 0.2 67.9 14.2 4.7 78.7 45.6 80.0 48.5 29.5

LOS F B A E B A E D E D C
Approach Delay 17.2 14.3 58.6 55.2
Approach LOS B B E E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 109 852 0 45 167 9 28 54 199 82 141 Queue Length 95th (ft) m115 m889 m0 m61 m285 m42 53 112 #276 138 266 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2558 2554 938 1240
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 140 140
Base Capacity (vph) 391 3021 961 84 2671 880 138 234 491 437 527 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.89 0.09 0.60 0.76 0.29 0.41 0.38 0.83 0.23 0.69 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 148
Actuated Cycle Length: 148
Offset: 107 (72%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89
Intersection Signal Delay: 22.3 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Splits and Phases: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
450
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.
16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM Queues 10/14/2021
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 243 2689 90 50 2019 257 57 88 407 102 366 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.89 0.09 0.61 0.76 0.29 0.42 0.38 0.86 0.23 0.69 Control Delay 80.5 12.0 0.2 67.9 14.2 4.7 78.7 45.6 80.0 48.5 29.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 80.5 12.0 0.2 67.9 14.2 4.7 78.7 45.6 80.0 48.5 29.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 109 852 0 45 167 9 28 54 199 82 141 Queue Length 95th (ft) m115 m889 m0 m61 m285 m42 53 112 #276 138 266 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2558 2554 938 1240
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 165 275 170 115 140 140
Base Capacity (vph) 391 3021 961 84 2671 880 138 234 491 437 527 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.89 0.09 0.60 0.76 0.29 0.41 0.38 0.83 0.23 0.69 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 451
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

HERNDON AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY

APPENDIX D

QUEUING AND BLOCKING REPORTS
452
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

HERNDON AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY
Year 2042 With Quad Intersections
453
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 177 218 284 304 378 282 88 266 491 632 597 290 Average Queue (ft) 91 103 161 183 229 47 39 82 330 378 403 200 95th Queue (ft) 165 181 244 273 329 166 75 236 494 598 593 390 Link Distance (ft) 2529 2529 2529 1810 1810 1810
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 315 315 220 280 280 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 8 21 42
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 14 25 90
Intersection: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L T R L L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 313 446 108 143 340 590 340
Average Queue (ft) 180 223 38 44 170 381 191
95th Queue (ft) 307 384 86 111 360 670 393
Link Distance (ft) 882 882 576
Upstream Blk Time (%) 15
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 250 250 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 11 8 37 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 33 15 127 0
454
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB
Directions Served T T T R T T T R T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 226 267 359 310 502 556 588 240 461 528 570 305 Average Queue (ft) 129 135 168 193 265 297 342 127 299 301 393 133 95th Queue (ft) 203 213 278 309 447 487 524 291 425 469 591 348 Link Distance (ft) 1810 1810 1810 1248 1248 1248 574 574 574 Upstream Blk Time (%) 02
Queuing Penalty (veh) 09
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 150 215
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 8 34 0 36
Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 39 56 1 41
Intersection: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 1153 1162 1164 355
Average Queue (ft) 1075 1082 1070 189
95th Queue (ft) 1290 1296 1317 374
Link Distance (ft) 1117 1117 1117
Upstream Blk Time (%) 28 36 31
Queuing Penalty (veh) 157 207 179
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 265
Storage Blk Time (%) 21 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 56 5
455
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB SB SB
Directions Served L L TTTTTTRR L L
Maximum Queue (ft) 184 195 48 79 108 260 279 310 278 74 197 174 Average Queue (ft) 95 115 9 24 42 151 158 185 46 32 113 92 95th Queue (ft) 159 174 35 63 89 235 249 280 149 64 177 162 Link Distance (ft) 1248 1248 1248 1260 1260 1260 704 704 Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 215 215
Storage Blk Time (%) 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 10
Intersection: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
Movement SB SB
Directions Served R R
Maximum Queue (ft) 310 282
Average Queue (ft) 194 172
95th Queue (ft) 279 259
Link Distance (ft) 704 704
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
456
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served T T T R T T T R TTTT
Maximum Queue (ft) 125 147 197 117 117 139 157 95 134 103 218 193 Average Queue (ft) 44 64 108 26 50 63 84 29 64 19 145 101 95th Queue (ft) 98 121 177 78 92 114 139 69 116 73 204 188 Link Distance (ft) 1260 1260 1260 543 543 543 862 862
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 130 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 3 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 5 0
Intersection: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement SB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 148
Average Queue (ft) 59
95th Queue (ft) 117
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 220
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served T T T R L T T T L R R
Maximum Queue (ft) 152 160 192 42 193 148 198 241 244 128 108 Average Queue (ft) 81 83 111 10 88 37 72 109 129 59 32
95th Queue (ft) 137 139 171 32 161 106 149 197 210 104 74 Link Distance (ft) 543 543 543 543 1172 1172 1172
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
457
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 94 101 110 132 140 115 98 114 290 301 343 255 Average Queue (ft) 37 49 44 64 63 37 41 57 158 167 178 73 95th Queue (ft) 77 89 90 109 118 85 82 96 257 267 290 187 Link Distance (ft) 1172 1172 1172 1179 1179 1179
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 115 270 270 165
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 1 13 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 1 1 33 0
Intersection: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 210 250 218 268 204 246 280 210 178
Average Queue (ft) 97 150 116 143 115 172 144 107 66
95th Queue (ft) 195 227 196 238 222 243 241 188 130
Link Distance (ft) 957 957 389 389
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 160 160 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 0 1 16 5 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 0 1 25 13 2 1
Intersection: 7: Minneawa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB NB
Directions Served TR R
Maximum Queue (ft) 3 92
Average Queue (ft) 0 38
95th Queue (ft) 3 69
Link Distance (ft) 1179 666
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
458
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T TR L T T T R LTR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 90 128 154 174 119 346 321 335 105 32 126 73 Average Queue (ft) 30 54 79 96 32 168 131 133 29 7 89 21 95th Queue (ft) 70 113 138 159 84 301 267 265 74 28 131 54 Link Distance (ft) 696 696 696 464 464 464 138 91 91
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 23 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 275 275
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1
Intersection: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T R L L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 45 95 256 454 264 310 764 627 62 198 293 310 Average Queue (ft) 3 37 22 163 171 235 403 99 17 50 120 134 95th Queue (ft) 22 79 172 442 314 375 990 401 47 114 270 283 Link Distance (ft) 587 587 744 744 1117 1117
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 4 43 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 125 125 220 220 160 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 46 59 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 4 5 4
Intersection: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 420 210 199 310 815 790 771 240
Average Queue (ft) 161 141 94 246 540 503 447 86
95th Queue (ft) 382 258 177 392 1009 974 927 266
Link Distance (ft) 1117 811 811 811
Upstream Blk Time (%) 22 13 11
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 120 220 220 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 5 10 0 1 57 50
Queuing Penalty (veh) 30 31 1 3 143 26
459
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T R L T TR L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 82 66 48 33 71 126 416 510 203 367 375 45 Average Queue (ft) 28 19 12 4 29 41 160 231 73 111 128 7 95th Queue (ft) 64 49 36 19 60 90 349 459 151 274 294 27 Link Distance (ft) 133 286 505 505 574 574 574
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 95 100 80 150 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 4 1 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 2 5 3
Intersection: 11: Peach Ave (East) & Peach Ave
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
460
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 278 316 422 392 359 268 114 123 276 314 343 245 Average Queue (ft) 182 200 252 238 207 51 50 67 173 206 218 145 95th Queue (ft) 289 322 450 417 320 161 97 109 256 290 309 262 Link Distance (ft) 2561 2561 2561 2505 2505 2505
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 180 1000 1000 155
Storage Blk Time (%) 7 10 2 8 26 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 40 63 7 15 103 32
Intersection: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 176 266 358 334 184 102 143 236 218 169 Average Queue (ft) 85 139 216 191 57 39 61 141 121 75
95th Queue (ft) 174 218 307 281 132 84 112 207 189 140
Link Distance (ft) 952 952 534 534
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 220 215 215 140
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 5 4 0141
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 10 6 0171
461
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB
Directions Served L L T T T R L T T T R L
Maximum Queue (ft) 177 189 280 302 314 94 62 211 906 256 235 108 Average Queue (ft) 91 99 158 179 195 9 17 116 168 159 90 18 95th Queue (ft) 155 162 247 268 290 52 47 195 562 242 171 62 Link Distance (ft) 2505 2505 2505 2529 2529 2529
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 260 260 165 275 170 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 11 0 6 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 3 0 23 4 0
Intersection: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 146 185 177 217 295 222
Average Queue (ft) 67 63 72 118 55 118
95th Queue (ft) 123 138 151 192 202 205
Link Distance (ft) 906 1237
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 140 140 140
Storage Blk Time (%) 331428
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 2 2 11 7 16
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1775
462
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 106 405 1900 2045 2012 310 90 133 357 385 409 290 Average Queue (ft) 38 190 1143 1187 1224 243 37 52 253 285 304 85 95th Queue (ft) 86 478 2074 2146 2164 432 75 102 335 365 389 260 Link Distance (ft) 2529 2529 2529 1810 1810 1810
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 315 315 220 280 280 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 41 49 0 4 32
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 45 107 0 4 29
Intersection: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L T R L L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 315 920 912 225 340 580 340
Average Queue (ft) 253 760 513 106 199 322 162
95th Queue (ft) 421 1119 1205 211 354 586 353
Link Distance (ft) 882 882 576
Upstream Blk Time (%) 49 27 7
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 250 250 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 3 70 0 1 26 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 14 110 0 3 122 2
463
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB
Directions Served T T T R T T T R T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 636 800 632 315 178 210 242 200 519 518 527 305 Average Queue (ft) 339 325 360 283 111 133 162 94 322 326 316 164 95th Queue (ft) 524 577 554 355 161 182 221 167 511 518 511 359 Link Distance (ft) 1810 1810 1810 1248 1248 1248 574 574 574 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 2 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 150 215
Storage Blk Time (%) 23 21 7 1 25
Queuing Penalty (veh) 138 170 20 8 62
Intersection: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 1147 1162 1156 355
Average Queue (ft) 1025 1033 1005 212
95th Queue (ft) 1299 1302 1316 420
Link Distance (ft) 1117 1117 1117
Upstream Blk Time (%) 7 11 9
Queuing Penalty (veh) 39 60 51
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 265
Storage Blk Time (%) 11 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 32 9
464
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB SB SB
Directions Served L L TTTTTTRR L L
Maximum Queue (ft) 236 241 141 181 205 269 262 301 270 127 273 256 Average Queue (ft) 142 156 66 103 123 178 179 206 81 70 168 148 95th Queue (ft) 208 217 127 169 193 246 249 275 177 112 247 233 Link Distance (ft) 1248 1248 1248 1260 1260 1260 704 704 Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 215 215
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 21
Intersection: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
Movement SB SB
Directions Served R R
Maximum Queue (ft) 242 213
Average Queue (ft) 136 108
95th Queue (ft) 211 187
Link Distance (ft) 704 704
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
465
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served T T T R T T T R TTTT
Maximum Queue (ft) 156 170 328 176 127 166 305 205 120 90 288 264 Average Queue (ft) 58 80 111 38 64 80 154 78 57 13 184 147 95th Queue (ft) 128 150 258 103 111 135 245 178 103 57 253 223 Link Distance (ft) 1260 1260 1260 543 543 543 862 862
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 130 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 4 0 14 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 12 1 58 2 1
Intersection: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement SB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 156
Average Queue (ft) 64
95th Queue (ft) 124
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 220
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Intersection: 5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served T T T R L T T T L R R
Maximum Queue (ft) 208 192 212 36 182 128 274 367 344 265 221 Average Queue (ft) 139 129 146 7 104 40 93 194 201 175 132 95th Queue (ft) 200 187 203 26 164 99 199 326 306 245 202 Link Distance (ft) 543 543 543 543 1172 1172 1172
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
466
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 123 126 278 304 323 205 144 156 274 389 514 255 Average Queue (ft) 65 71 162 182 201 108 76 89 141 185 268 166 95th Queue (ft) 109 112 252 269 297 226 125 138 228 313 434 310 Link Distance (ft) 1172 1172 1172 1179 1179 1179
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 115 270 270 165
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 30 2 0 32 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 84 15 1 111 9
Intersection: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 209 264 285 281 204 248 304 187 137
Average Queue (ft) 86 153 151 168 131 181 131 90 63
95th Queue (ft) 189 235 239 251 226 246 235 157 119
Link Distance (ft) 957 957 389 389
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 160 160 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 1 1 21 2 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 4 1 29 5 0 0
Intersection: 7: Minneawa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB NB
Directions Served T T TR R
Maximum Queue (ft) 4 7 8 175
Average Queue (ft) 0 0 0 89
95th Queue (ft) 4 5 5 153
Link Distance (ft) 1179 1179 1179 666
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
467
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T TR L T T T R LTR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 147 248 272 285 90 313 365 431 316 96 120 55 Average Queue (ft) 63 139 162 175 26 167 165 214 57 38 92 16 95th Queue (ft) 117 227 252 269 65 276 310 370 185 78 124 43 Link Distance (ft) 696 696 696 464 464 464 138 91 91
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 23
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 275 275
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 8
Intersection: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T R L L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 162 190 78 177 257 294 414 703 141 250 377 386 Average Queue (ft) 67 119 11 58 126 183 77 387 64 116 217 241 95th Queue (ft) 165 178 47 138 246 277 397 676 123 232 354 365 Link Distance (ft) 587 587 744 744 1117 1117
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 125 125 220 220 160 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 16 1 6 0 1 20
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 0 2 1 3 40
Intersection: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 389 210 263 310 796 742 688 240
Average Queue (ft) 244 70 159 260 479 431 362 87
95th Queue (ft) 375 204 255 364 889 830 761 250
Link Distance (ft) 1117 811 811 811
Upstream Blk Time (%) 17 6 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 120 220 220 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 33 2 8 45 38
Queuing Penalty (veh) 23 7 31 170 33
468
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T R L T TR L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 133 157 90 85 114 240 547 542 250 589 614 619 Average Queue (ft) 115 124 34 19 54 127 463 445 166 358 365 106 95th Queue (ft) 147 180 72 59 93 262 621 624 280 575 594 475 Link Distance (ft) 133 286 505 505 574 574 574
Upstream Blk Time (%) 11 20 20 18 1 6 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 8 41 22
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 95 100 80 150 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 37 13 0 0 3 3 32 14 30
Queuing Penalty (veh) 49 23 0 0 2 33 30 132 47
Intersection: 11: Peach Ave (East) & Peach Ave
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
469
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 295 340 1184 1155 1097 270 214 340 408 425 460 245 Average Queue (ft) 257 324 701 687 633 252 121 150 283 316 338 192 95th Queue (ft) 354 398 1252 1228 1120 329 206 287 386 418 445 328 Link Distance (ft) 2523 2523 2523 2535 2535 2535
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 180 250 250 155
Storage Blk Time (%) 41 56 29 40 9 1 2 16 41 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 297 403 95 160 62 4 12 47 81 1
Intersection: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB B34 B34
Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 207 325 441 427 302 257 305 534 499 230 51 27 Average Queue (ft) 104 179 270 248 163 171 234 314 288 180 5 2 95th Queue (ft) 191 308 431 409 306 264 341 524 483 283 48 27 Link Distance (ft) 946 946 556 556 626 626
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 220 215 215 140
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 17 19 3 4 12 23 34 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 39 50 8 15 43 91 110 42
470
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB
Directions Served L L T T T R L T T T R L
Maximum Queue (ft) 150 217 339 360 381 255 104 153 173 176 116 60 Average Queue (ft) 75 86 229 252 270 77 43 77 98 102 52 12 95th Queue (ft) 131 152 319 340 363 245 88 136 155 157 102 40 Link Distance (ft) 2535 2535 2535 2529 2529 2529
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 260 260 165 275 170 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 5 31 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 11 26 1 0
Intersection: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 95 131 185 230 698 230
Average Queue (ft) 38 52 162 198 268 170
95th Queue (ft) 82 104 214 257 636 254
Link Distance (ft) 921 1230
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 140 140 140
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 20 40 1 22
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 89 176 5 104
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 4069
471
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

HERNDON AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY
Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections
472
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 143 249 633 890 544 310 104 110 332 368 408 290 Average Queue (ft) 77 98 252 283 315 131 41 58 249 285 308 143 95th Queue (ft) 137 181 511 624 485 347 85 98 317 353 386 337 Link Distance (ft) 2528 2528 2528 1822 1822 1822
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 315 315 220 280 280 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 2 21 3 37
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 35 3 79
Intersection: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L T R L L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 313 421 100 151 340 601 340
Average Queue (ft) 171 221 38 47 178 393 205
95th Queue (ft) 287 363 80 112 375 660 399
Link Distance (ft) 882 882 576
Upstream Blk Time (%) 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 250 250 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 6 10 0 0 39 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 16 17 0 0 132 6
473
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 265 316 416 397 488 315 223 365 1273 1286 1273 240 Average Queue (ft) 141 164 228 228 264 253 121 293 1142 1152 1161 173 95th Queue (ft) 286 315 369 348 422 356 208 480 1520 1509 1496 330 Link Distance (ft) 1822 1822 1822 1248 1248 1248
Upstream Blk Time (%) 10 11 13
Queuing Penalty (veh) 80 87 103
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 225 275 275 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 3 5 3 16 21 0 1 61 67 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 14 21 7 67 88 1 7 142 109 1
Intersection: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 370 415 595 579 370 141 121 355 1136 1143 355 Average Queue (ft) 354 399 519 310 205 35 46 236 1088 1092 298 95th Queue (ft) 417 465 738 590 311 89 100 475 1267 1272 476 Link Distance (ft) 573 573 573 1117 1117
Upstream Blk Time (%) 30 0 0 14 18
Queuing Penalty (veh) 170 2 0 115 149
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 325 325 215 265 265 265
Storage Blk Time (%) 35 60 1 8 0 64 64 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 123 210 3 9 0 125 169 10
474
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T T T T T T R L L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 104 123 187 328 376 1286 1299 1290 305 126 97 127 Average Queue (ft) 36 60 79 104 146 692 707 724 139 59 29 61 95th Queue (ft) 83 105 159 245 288 1581 1594 1594 388 110 73 112 Link Distance (ft) 1248 1248 1248 1265 1265 1265 716 716 716 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 2 3 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 19 23 28
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 215
Storage Blk Time (%) 52
Queuing Penalty (veh) 38
Intersection: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
Movement SB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 88
Average Queue (ft) 23
95th Queue (ft) 59
Link Distance (ft) 716
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
475
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 174 114 218 250 101 250 568 573 565 205 130 188 Average Queue (ft) 88 40 66 88 9 104 299 309 320 96 65 75 95th Queue (ft) 154 89 141 176 54 249 603 608 610 247 118 151 Link Distance (ft) 1265 1265 1265 543 543 543
Upstream Blk Time (%) 11 11 13
Queuing Penalty (veh) 84 89 100
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 130 160 115 240
Storage Blk Time (%) 3 0 34 45 0 37
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 1 28 72 0 45
Intersection: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB SB SB SB
Directions Served R L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 137 179 316 232
Average Queue (ft) 30 123 131 72
95th Queue (ft) 88 191 249 154
Link Distance (ft) 856
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 90 220
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 32 21
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 85 66
Intersection: 5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave
Movement EB WB WB WB WB NB
Directions Served TR L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 14 402 958 1001 1016 56
Average Queue (ft) 1 62 170 182 193 20
95th Queue (ft) 9 247 714 745 775 49
Link Distance (ft) 543 1190 1190 1190
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350
Storage Blk Time (%) 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 7
476
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 95 101 114 139 145 126 102 140 358 383 391 249 Average Queue (ft) 34 47 37 60 68 43 48 65 162 165 162 62 95th Queue (ft) 76 88 90 120 128 99 91 114 282 292 299 178 Link Distance (ft) 1190 1190 1190 1179 1179 1179
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 115 270 270 165
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 1 9 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 2 1 23 1
Intersection: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 183 226 217 272 202 248 326 215 151
Average Queue (ft) 86 134 123 157 122 178 157 112 61
95th Queue (ft) 169 200 197 251 226 247 260 191 119
Link Distance (ft) 957 957 389 389
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 160 160 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 1 19 5 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 30 14 1 0
Intersection: 7: Minneawa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB NB
Directions Served TR R
Maximum Queue (ft) 5 86
Average Queue (ft) 0 38
95th Queue (ft) 5 68
Link Distance (ft) 1179 666
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
477
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T TR L T T T R LTR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 84 183 209 225 147 423 373 324 98 37 120 73 Average Queue (ft) 31 70 95 115 33 199 153 126 27 7 91 23 95th Queue (ft) 72 151 181 203 95 357 304 248 71 29 129 60 Link Distance (ft) 696 696 696 464 464 464 138 91 91
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 28 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 275 275
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1
Intersection: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T R L L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 17 86 58 217 27 49 24 79 61 83 224 253 Average Queue (ft) 1 31 4 68 3 10 5 29 13 39 66 81
95th Queue (ft) 8 69 32 156 16 35 19 59 42 76 177 209
Link Distance (ft) 586 586 744 744 1117 1117
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 125 125 220 220 160 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1
Intersection: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 263 169 41 310 858 863 856 240
Average Queue (ft) 93 11 7 143 614 600 555 113
95th Queue (ft) 222 71 28 367 1079 1077 1074 304
Link Distance (ft) 1117 811 811 811
Upstream Blk Time (%) 40 42 37
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 120 220 220 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 5 57 67 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 31 35 5
478
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T R L T TR L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 91 107 55 81 87 240 547 528 179 366 386 150 Average Queue (ft) 39 30 12 9 29 97 437 380 73 115 127 16 95th Queue (ft) 90 92 42 51 68 252 676 655 147 282 290 78 Link Distance (ft) 127 281 505 505 573 573
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 4 41 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 95 100 80 150 160 76
Storage Blk Time (%) 4 3 1 2 0 51 0 3 8 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 1 0 1 25 2 3 7 0
Intersection: 11: Peach Ave (East) & Peach Ave
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
479
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 228 283 341 331 332 248 111 122 210 228 241 187 Average Queue (ft) 132 154 232 229 213 52 47 63 106 137 152 73 95th Queue (ft) 210 236 311 308 298 170 96 106 183 204 221 150 Link Distance (ft) 2574 2574 2574 2532 2532 2532
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 180 250 250 155
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 4 11 0 8 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 12 20 0 32 5
Intersection: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 165 298 364 330 272 113 166 234 214 181 Average Queue (ft) 89 143 233 215 70 44 67 145 123 74
95th Queue (ft) 176 237 329 309 173 96 124 211 190 143
Link Distance (ft) 1165 1165 514 514
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 220 215 215 140
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 8 9 0 1 4 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 17 13 0 1 7 2
480
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB
Directions Served L L T T T R L T T T R L
Maximum Queue (ft) 164 191 535 554 363 231 52 193 224 246 202 107 Average Queue (ft) 91 102 210 228 239 19 15 98 133 144 81 14 95th Queue (ft) 148 162 448 465 337 115 41 174 201 216 155 55 Link Distance (ft) 2532 2532 2532 2528 2528 2528
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 260 260 165 275 170 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 2 17 4 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 5 15 3 0
Intersection: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 129 155 164 202 275 225
Average Queue (ft) 58 64 62 104 48 123
95th Queue (ft) 111 130 133 174 174 208
Link Distance (ft) 845 1229
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 140 140 140
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 4 0 2 1 9
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 3 1 6 5 18
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 3168
481
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 92 405 2054 2086 2118 310 98 259 433 470 495 290 Average Queue (ft) 35 168 1000 1016 1060 227 42 62 310 343 370 122 95th Queue (ft) 73 443 2025 2046 2080 432 83 159 420 450 479 337 Link Distance (ft) 2528 2528 2528 1822 1822 1822
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 315 315 220 280 280 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 44 48 8 22
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 48 106 8 20
Intersection: 1: Chestnut Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L T R L L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 315 863 701 233 340 593 340
Average Queue (ft) 255 619 243 133 226 371 196
95th Queue (ft) 402 1012 814 243 379 621 385
Link Distance (ft) 882 882 576
Upstream Blk Time (%) 17 3 8
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 250 250 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 8 58 3 5 28 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 36 91 15 28 130 1
482
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 335 390 1832 1832 1846 315 320 365 1205 1190 1110 240 Average Queue (ft) 235 350 1333 1345 1389 313 284 322 710 607 495 200 95th Queue (ft) 360 476 2229 2217 2224 336 381 444 1377 1192 987 311 Link Distance (ft) 1822 1822 1822 1248 1248 1248
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 1 1 7 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 5 13 46 1 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 225 275 275 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 11 17 44 49 48 46 58 10 41 9
Queuing Penalty (veh) 68 107 211 295 309 196 250 35 118 40 Intersection: 2: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 369 415 591 584 539 305 166 355 1139 1143 355 Average Queue (ft) 316 371 459 418 363 215 74 264 1078 1082 293 95th Queue (ft) 434 487 642 600 509 396 144 480 1287 1288 482 Link Distance (ft) 573 573 573 1117 1117
Upstream Blk Time (%) 6 0 0 13 17
Queuing Penalty (veh) 45 3 1 97 127
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 325 325 215 265 265 265
Storage Blk Time (%) 18 34 12 31 1 67 68 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 97 178 54 76 4 164 190 6
483
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T T T T T T R L L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 161 177 319 348 280 494 469 488 302 156 132 144 Average Queue (ft) 74 97 123 146 172 205 186 214 75 82 45 66 95th Queue (ft) 130 152 260 290 280 447 420 411 202 134 97 121 Link Distance (ft) 1248 1248 1248 1265 1265 1265 716 716 716 Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 300 215
Storage Blk Time (%) 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 13
Intersection: 3: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
Movement SB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 108
Average Queue (ft) 34
95th Queue (ft) 80
Link Distance (ft) 716
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
484
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 230 328 354 369 220 239 360 411 477 205 233 212 Average Queue (ft) 131 153 178 201 55 95 201 224 277 128 110 84 95th Queue (ft) 209 267 292 322 183 194 308 350 428 266 191 167 Link Distance (ft) 1265 1265 1265 543 543 543
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 130 160 115 240
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 18 0 3 22 44 0 0 37
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 24 0 15 20 108 0 1 93
Intersection: 4: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB SB SB SB
Directions Served R L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 140 180 879 310
Average Queue (ft) 59 175 592 160
95th Queue (ft) 120 192 995 381
Link Distance (ft) 856
Upstream Blk Time (%) 10
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 90 220
Storage Blk Time (%) 12 69 11
Queuing Penalty (veh) 26 212 54
Intersection: 5: Peach Ave (East) & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB WB WB NB
Directions Served T TR L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 57 2 88 12 119
Average Queue (ft) 2 0 31 1 49
95th Queue (ft) 56 2 71 10 93
Link Distance (ft) 543 543 1190
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
485
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 122 137 297 316 346 205 152 190 266 262 300 248 Average Queue (ft) 58 66 188 214 226 125 84 97 138 142 157 92 95th Queue (ft) 104 112 269 293 317 254 139 156 221 229 256 195 Link Distance (ft) 1190 1190 1190 1179 1179 1179
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 115 270 270 165
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 31 1 0 0 12 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 87 8 0 1 41 7
Intersection: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 196 226 265 312 204 249 341 211 148
Average Queue (ft) 88 138 166 188 137 189 148 104 54
95th Queue (ft) 174 207 251 279 231 255 261 189 114
Link Distance (ft) 957 957 389 389
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 225 160 160 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 2 1 24 5 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 6 2 34 15 2 0
Intersection: 7: Minneawa Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB NB
Directions Served T TR R
Maximum Queue (ft) 121 6 235
Average Queue (ft) 4 0 98
95th Queue (ft) 110 4 195
Link Distance (ft) 1179 1179 666
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
486
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 8: Dewitt Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T T TR L T T T R LTR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 166 206 246 248 146 438 382 421 310 103 113 60 Average Queue (ft) 66 105 133 144 30 236 198 206 50 35 95 15 95th Queue (ft) 132 189 222 233 91 385 344 362 173 79 128 45 Link Distance (ft) 696 696 696 464 464 464 138 91 91
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 0 34 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 275 275 275
Storage Blk Time (%) 4 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 7
Intersection: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T R L L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 151 180 64 194 85 133 72 171 139 249 454 477 Average Queue (ft) 27 87 6 66 17 48 21 74 60 96 157 188 95th Queue (ft) 100 154 38 144 53 105 54 141 116 181 338 366 Link Distance (ft) 586 586 744 744 1117 1117
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 125 125 220 220 160 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 5 0 0 7
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 2 14
Intersection: 9: Willow Ave & Spruce Ave
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 404 209 100 310 859 847 853 240
Average Queue (ft) 191 48 35 234 643 618 566 160
95th Queue (ft) 345 170 80 416 1051 1046 1042 337
Link Distance (ft) 1117 811 811 811
Upstream Blk Time (%) 40 34 28
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 120 220 220 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 15 0 60 71 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 11 0 79 61 8
487
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 10: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T R L T TR L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 127 162 100 126 125 239 555 540 250 581 594 151 Average Queue (ft) 104 113 32 23 53 115 515 487 135 324 335 19 95th Queue (ft) 147 179 77 86 101 257 585 602 255 613 630 94 Link Distance (ft) 127 281 505 505 573 573
Upstream Blk Time (%) 16 22 38 16 1 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 9 24
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 95 100 80 150 160 76
Storage Blk Time (%) 37 14 0 1 4 1 43 4 17 26
Queuing Penalty (veh) 48 24 0 1 2 8 41 36 26 11
Intersection: 11: Peach Ave (East) & Peach Ave
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
488
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 234 340 724 748 774 270 230 256 315 312 354 245 Average Queue (ft) 133 263 494 506 535 229 129 141 174 204 224 93 95th Queue (ft) 212 426 720 733 767 353 203 227 277 293 321 246 Link Distance (ft) 5213 5213 5213 2526 2526 2526
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 180 250 250 155
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 30 38 4 0 0 1 14 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 2 99 153 27 1 2 2 27 0
Intersection: 15: Cedar Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB B37 B37
Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 238 339 672 686 310 259 305 536 523 230 111 96 Average Queue (ft) 117 211 373 370 222 191 253 346 329 202 15 12 95th Queue (ft) 204 367 695 695 373 282 352 547 518 278 117 105 Link Distance (ft) 1462 1462 532 532 629 629
Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 220 215 215 140
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 31 35 10 10 21 24 37 23
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 2 70 91 31 34 72 96 121 80
489
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB
Directions Served L L T T T R L T T T R L
Maximum Queue (ft) 159 207 857 848 454 216 120 540 328 358 260 63 Average Queue (ft) 96 114 203 224 223 33 47 193 210 222 97 12 95th Queue (ft) 152 197 568 576 402 148 102 439 300 324 238 40 Link Distance (ft) 2526 2526 2526 2528 2528 2528
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 260 260 165 275 170 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 3 24 1 23 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 21 0 57 0
Intersection: 16: Maple Ave & Herndon Ave
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 97 140 185 229 717 230
Average Queue (ft) 38 58 150 189 286 166
95th Queue (ft) 83 115 219 254 696 256
Link Distance (ft) 942 1244
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 140 140 140
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 2 11 26 4 20
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 49 114 26 96
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 5698
490
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

HERNDON AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY

APPENDIX E

ARTERIAL ANALYSES
491
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

HERNDON AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY
Year 2042 With Quad Intersections
492
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Arterial Level of Service Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-AM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Arterial Level of Service: EB Herndon Ave
Delay Travel Dist Arterial
Cross Street Node (s/veh) time (s) (mi) Speed
Cedar Ave 15 24.5 59.5 0.5 30
Maple Ave 16 23.4 59.3 0.5 30
Chestnut Ave 1 21.8 57.2 0.5 31
Willow Ave 2 24.7 50.6 0.4 26
Helm Ave 3 5.6 24.4 0.3 38
Peach Ave 4 9.6 28.2 0.3 33
Peach Ave (East) 5 10.7 19.3 0.1 22
Villa Ave 6 8.4 25.6 0.2 34
Minneawa Ave 7 3.9 21.4 0.2 40
Dewitt Ave 8 5.2 15.6 0.1 34
Total 137.8 361.2 3.1 31
Arterial Level of Service: WB Herndon Ave
Delay Travel Dist Arterial
Cross Street Node (s/veh) time (s) (mi) Speed
Dewitt Ave 8 8.6 15.6 0.1 23
Minneawa Ave 7 4.2 14.7 0.1 36
Villa Ave 6 20.8 37.6 0.2 23
Peach Ave (East) 5 10.5 28.2 0.2 31
Peach Ave 4 4.1 12.7 0.1 33
Helm Ave 3 14.8 33.3 0.3 28
Willow Ave 2 33.8 52.1 0.3 18
Chestnut Ave 1 53.5 79.6 0.4 17
Maple Ave 16 22.5 57.4 0.5 31
Cedar Ave 15 26.0 61.4 0.5 29
Total 198.9 392.6 2.7 25
493
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Arterial Level of Service Year 2042 With Quad Intersections-PM 10/15/2021
SimTraffic Report
Arterial Level of Service: EB Herndon Ave
Delay Travel Dist Arterial
Cross Street Node (s/veh) time (s) (mi) Speed
Cedar Ave 15 73.9 108.2 0.5 16
Maple Ave 16 39.3 75.2 0.5 24
Chestnut Ave 1 137.4 173.3 0.5 11
Willow Ave 2 49.5 75.1 0.4 18
Helm Ave 3 14.2 33.1 0.3 28
Peach Ave 4 11.9 30.6 0.3 30
Peach Ave (East) 5 16.0 24.7 0.1 17
Villa Ave 6 22.4 39.5 0.2 22
Minneawa Ave 7 9.4 26.4 0.2 33
Dewitt Ave 8 9.0 19.4 0.1 27
Total 382.9 605.5 3.1 19
Arterial Level of Service: WB Herndon Ave
Delay Travel Dist Arterial
Cross Street Node (s/veh) time (s) (mi) Speed
Dewitt Ave 8 13.1 20.3 0.1 17
Minneawa Ave 7 6.0 16.5 0.1 32
Villa Ave 6 28.2 45.1 0.2 19
Peach Ave (East) 5 16.2 33.6 0.2 26
Peach Ave 4 8.8 17.3 0.1 24
Helm Ave 3 25.0 43.2 0.3 21
Willow Ave 2 10.6 28.8 0.3 33
Chestnut Ave 1 35.7 62.2 0.4 21
Maple Ave 16 14.1 49.8 0.5 36
Cedar Ave 15 49.0 84.5 0.5 21
Total 206.6 401.4 2.7 24
494
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

HERNDON AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY
Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections
495
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Arterial Level of Service Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-AM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Arterial Level of Service: EB Herndon Ave
Delay Travel Dist Arterial
Cross Street Node (s/veh) time (s) (mi) Speed
Cedar Ave 15 25.4 60.5 0.5 30
Maple Ave 16 27.4 63.6 0.5 28
Chestnut Ave 1 39.7 75.1 0.5 24
Willow Ave 2 57.5 83.6 0.4 16
Helm Ave 3 15.9 34.5 0.3 27
Peach Ave 4 12.0 30.9 0.3 30
Peach Ave (East) 5 3.1 11.8 0.1 36
Villa Ave 6 9.6 26.8 0.2 33
Minneawa Ave 7 3.5 20.9 0.2 41
Dewitt Ave 8 6.9 17.3 0.1 30
Total 201.0 424.8 3.1 27
Arterial Level of Service: WB Herndon Ave
Delay Travel Dist Arterial
Cross Street Node (s/veh) time (s) (mi) Speed
Dewitt Ave 8 9.3 16.2 0.1 22
Minneawa Ave 7 4.3 14.8 0.1 35
Villa Ave 6 21.0 37.8 0.2 23
Peach Ave (East) 5 33.4 50.9 0.2 17
Peach Ave 4 45.6 53.8 0.1 8
Helm Ave 3 116.8 134.7 0.3 7
Willow Ave 2 197.7 218.4 0.3 4
Chestnut Ave 1 46.2 72.1 0.4 18
Maple Ave 16 18.7 53.6 0.5 33
Cedar Ave 15 17.8 53.6 0.5 34
Total 510.7 706.1 2.7 14
496
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

Arterial Level of Service Year 2042 Without Quad Intersections-PM 10/14/2021
SimTraffic Report
Arterial Level of Service: EB Herndon Ave
Delay Travel Dist Arterial
Cross Street Node (s/veh) time (s) (mi) Speed
Cedar Ave 15 59.8 129.7 1.0 28
Maple Ave 16 29.7 65.0 0.5 28
Chestnut Ave 1 126.5 160.8 0.5 11
Willow Ave 2 167.4 203.5 0.4 7
Helm Ave 3 19.4 38.0 0.3 25
Peach Ave 4 22.5 41.2 0.3 23
Peach Ave (East) 5 5.9 14.5 0.1 29
Villa Ave 6 22.5 39.5 0.2 22
Minneawa Ave 7 8.7 25.7 0.2 33
Dewitt Ave 8 6.8 17.2 0.1 30
Total 469.3 735.1 3.6 18
Arterial Level of Service: WB Herndon Ave
Delay Travel Dist Arterial
Cross Street Node (s/veh) time (s) (mi) Speed
Dewitt Ave 8 13.7 20.8 0.1 17
Minneawa Ave 7 5.3 15.8 0.1 33
Villa Ave 6 20.8 37.6 0.2 23
Peach Ave (East) 5 7.0 24.8 0.2 35
Peach Ave 4 32.7 41.0 0.1 10
Helm Ave 3 25.9 44.2 0.3 21
Willow Ave 2 70.1 88.5 0.3 11
Chestnut Ave 1 41.3 67.5 0.4 20
Maple Ave 16 32.9 67.6 0.5 27
Cedar Ave 15 23.2 58.6 0.5 31
Total 272.9 466.5 2.7 21
497
AGENDA ITEM NO. 20.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: August 1, 2022
SUBJECT: Consider Approval – Res. 22-___, Adopting the Clovis Fire Department Master Services Plan.

Staff: John Binaski, Fire Chief
Recommendation: Approve
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 22-___

2. Standards of Cover 2022-2027

3. Strategic Plan 2022-2027

4. 2021 Fire Department Annual Report

5. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None

RECOMMENDATION
For the City Council to approve a resolution adopting the updated Master Services Plan for the Fire Department.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
One of the key components of an accredited fire agency is the ability to have documents that review past performance, set goals for the future, and have both internal and external input.

These documents are known as a Master Services Plan and consists of three major components: 1) Strategic Plan, 2) Standards of Cover and 3) Annual Report. In addition, the City’s Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), the annual budget adopted by City Council, and the California Fire Code support planning and deployment of fire services. The Clovis Fire Department adopted the first Master Services Plan in June 2009 and has updated it several times with the last update in June 2017. We are bringing forth updates to the Strategic Plan, Standards of Cover, and Emergency Operations Plan in this resolution. The 2021 Annual Report was presented to Council on April 18, 2022.
498
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

These documents are developed to provide guidance to the Fire Department and the community stakeholders regarding fire and life safety issues and deployment within the City of Clovis.

Updating and adopting the Master Services Plan provides for efficient emergency response based on service level objectives established by Council, ensures fiscal resources are utilized responsibly, fulfills a key element of the accreditation process, and has a direct impact on reducing insurance rates for customers by evaluation services such as the Insurance Services Office. Adoption of the Master Services Plan is not binding but demonstrates the City’s commitment to the Fire Department’s planning process.

BACKGROUND
The Fire Department Master Services Plan is a series of documents containing performance data, establishes benchmark performance, establishes goals and objectives for the department and gives a comprehensive picture of the fire and life safety efforts the department provides to the community. As part of the City’s General Plan, the Master Services Plan compiles all primary planning guides into one comprehensive document outlining strategies for current and future fire and life safety issues within the community.

The Strategic Plan is the cornerstone of the Master Services Plan. Developed as a collaborative effort between community stakeholders and Fire Department personnel, it serves as a roadmap for current service delivery and establishes goals for the future of the Department. In Fall of 2021, the department held meetings with external stakeholders, and in the Spring of 2022 the department held meetings with each shift for internal stakeholders. Starting with a historical background of fire services within Clovis, followed by strategic initiatives, and specific goals, the Strategic Plan supports the short- and long-term vision by establishing strategic objectives.

While the Strategic Plan provides an overview of the Fire Department, the Standards of Cover document provides the quantifiable data to support daily operations. To responsibly utilize fiscal, physical and personnel resources, the Standards of Cover first establishes a Community Risk Assessment unique to Clovis. Composed of a frequency and severity of loss analysis, the Risk Assessment is followed by Performance Expectations outlining community risk reduction efforts and response strategies within the community. These expectations are then broken down into Critical Task Analysis for both fire and emergency medical type emergencies. Exhibits of current resource deployment and distribution provide geo-spatial context for how the Clovis Fire Department utilizes assets to meet performance expectations. The final portion of the Standards of Cover includes reliability studies, communication and notification performance objectives and historical performance data to measure past performance and plan for the Department’s future.

In short, it allows the Fire Department to send the appropriate number of resources to the unique call type within a timeframe that provides the best cost/benefit return for the effort.

The Fire Departments Annual report is a summary of our performance for the year along with accomplishments and an update to the department goals and objectives. The annual report also references the City of Clovis Annual Budget, which is approved by Council each year. This document is produced annually and is used to communicate with City Council and external stakeholders on how the Fire Department is performing.
499
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

The Emergency Operations Plan is a document written and maintained by the Emergency Operations Manager who works within the Fire Department. This documents the City’s protocol to emergencies within City limits.

The Fire Department is recommending adoption of the Master Services Plan to demonstrate comprehensive planning on the part of the City and maintain commitment to the established goal of being the Safest City in the Valley. The purpose is to give the Fire Department the support of its elected body in its pursuit of achieving its mission and to provide a public forum by which to communicate the Department’s mission to the community.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Fire Department Master Services Plan bears no fiscal impact as it is a planning document used to provide department direction only.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
Adopting the Master Services Plan affirms commitment to a planned means of delivering fire services to the community, assists with accreditation and improves ratings by evaluation services like the Insurance Services Office.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Adopt by resolution and file adopted Fire Department Master Services Plan.

Prepared by: Katie Krahn, Management Analyst
Reviewed by: City Manager JH
500
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 22-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS

APPROVING THE UPDATED FIRE DEPARTMENT MASTER SERVICES PLAN WHEREAS, the Clovis Fire Department was established in 1917 to provide for the fire and life safety of the community; and
WHEREAS, the Fire Department has updated the Master Services Plan including a Strategic Plan, Standards of Cover, Annual Report, Emergency Operations Plan, and Annual Budget to be included as reference in the City’s General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Fire Department Master Services Plan provides short and long term direction for Fire Department planning; and
WHEREAS, the Fire Department Master Services Plan is a key component in maintaining the accreditation of the Fire Department by the Commission on Fire Accreditation International and adoption of this Plan is a component in improving our community rating by outside agencies, such as the Insurance Services Office; and
WHEREAS, adoption of this Plan will guide the Fire Department in continuing to protect the lives and property of the inhabitants of the City of Clovis from the adverse effects of fire, sudden emergencies, and exposure to dangerous conditions; and WHEREAS, the Fire Department Master Services Plan demonstrates the City’s commitment to effective planning.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Clovis to adopt the Fire Department Master Services Plan.
* * * * *
The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on August 1, 2022, by the following vote, to wit.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:
______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk
501
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
1 ATTACHMENT 2
502
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
2 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………….…….3 Community Risk Assessment..……………………………………………………………………………….…….4 Description of Community Served…..……………………………………………………………………….…….7 Community Expectations…..……………………………………………………………………………………....22 Guiding Principles…..………………………………………………………………………………………….……23 Community Response History……………………………………………………………………………….……25 Review of System Performance…..………………………………………………………………………….……32 Natural Hazards Risk Assessment………………………………………………………………………….…….36 Fire Events Risk Assessment….…………………………………………………………………………….….....43 Fire Events Critical Task Analysis ..................................................................................................52 EMS Risk Assessment..................................................................................................................................55 EMS Critical Task Analysis...............................................................................................................62 Hazardous Materials Risk Assessment ......................................................................................................63 Hazardous Materials Critical Task Analysis ...................................................................................70 Technical Rescue Risk Assessment ...........................................................................................................71 Technical Rescue Critical Task Analysis .......................................................................................74 Distribution Factors .....................................................................................................................................75 Concentration Factors .................................................................................................................................84 Industry Standards on Measuring Performance .......................................................................................86 Fire Station Needs Analysis ........................................................................................................................88 Fire Station Coverage ..................................................................................................................................89 Appendix........................................................................................................................................................96

TABLE OF CONTENTS
503
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
3 As part of the ongoing accreditation process and to ensure compliance with adopted standards, the City of Clovis has actively worked to evaluate the fire department’s operations, deployment, and staffing. The Fire Department uses risk-based data-driven staffing and deployment plans based upon the specific and unique profile of the City of Clovis. These analyses culminated in a comprehensive deployment and staffing plan referred to as the Community Risk Assessment (CRA)/ Standards of Coverage (SOC).

The Clovis Fire Department (CFD) is a paid, career fire department that serves the community of Clovis with various core emergency response services, including fire suppression, emergency medical services (EMS), hazardous materials mitigation and technical rescue. In addition to these core services, CFD also provides several other community supportive functions, such as fire prevention and emergency preparedness services. Twenty-four hours a day, 365 days a year, nineteen personnel are on duty serving from six fire stations. These trained professional firefighters operate five engine companies staffed with three personnel each; one truck company staffed with three personnel; and one battalion chief command vehicle for a total of 19 personnel in daily staffing. In total, CFD employs 67 sworn Fire Suppression personnel, 3 Community Risk Reduction personnel, and 3.5 Administrative personnel. Together, these personnel provide amazing emergency services to the approximately 121,834 citizens within the City’s nearly 25 square miles.

Like other business units of a municipality, the fire service must adequately define the levels of service for the community it protects based on the unique characteristics of the community and availability of fiscal resources. As part of the Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI) process, a Community Risk Assessment/Standards of Cover (SOC) document adopted by the agency having jurisdiction sets the foundation for service level goals. In establishing these goals, the Clovis Fire Department used nationally recognized standards and best practices including: the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards, the CFAI – 10th Edition Fire and Emergency Services Self-Assessment Manual, the Utstein Reporting Criteria, American Heart Association guidelines, and the Insurance Services Office – Fire Suppression Rating Schedule. It also included input from a representative group of stakeholders from the community on the levels of service they want as residents.

Fire Chief John Binaski

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
504
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
4 COMMUNITY RISK ASSESSMENT
A Community Risk Assessment involves the analysis of risk for fire and non-fire emergencies (i.e., emergency medical services, hazardous materials, and technical rescue). Impacts to life safety, assets, and the environment are measured along with an incident’s relative probability. In summary, low risk is defined as incidents having low probability and low consequences; moderate risk is comprised of incidents having high probability with low consequences; high risk is defined as incidents having high probability and high consequences.

Within the categories of fire suppression, emergency medical services, hazardous materials and technical rescue, CFD has established specific risk classifications and has conducted critical task analyses to determine appropriate response levels. Critical task analysis determines how many personnel and what apparatus/equipment are necessary to mitigate a variety of emergency situations.

For low risk fires, three personnel will
respond, moderate risk structure fires will
have a response of sixteen personnel, and
high risk structure fires will have a response
of nineteen personnel. Three personnel will
respond to all moderate risk EMS incidents.

Low and moderate risk technical rescue and
hazardous materials (HazMat) incidents will
receive three personnel; ten personnel will
respond to high risk technical rescue and
HazMat incidents.

The Clovis Fire Department has established both baseline and benchmark performance measures.

Baseline measures reflect historical performance and benchmarks are Total Response Time (TRT) goals. TRT is measured in two ways, first-arriving unit and effective response force (ERF) (i.e., total number of personnel necessary to address the emergency situation). TRT is comprised of call processing time, turnout time, and travel time. CFD observes the 90th percentile of performance as opposed to the 50th percentile (i.e., average) response time. In other words, what is done the majority of the time as opposed to what it is doing half of the time. 505
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
5 Based on the City of Clovis’ adopted General Plan, a comprehensive risk assessment was conducted that included historical datasets, fiscal resources and input from community stakeholders.

The Standards of Cover document establishes three (3) primary benchmark performance measures in terms of deployment, and emergency response.

EMS benchmarks are 6 minutes and 30 seconds for the first-arriving unit and 10 minutes and 30 seconds for the ERF 90% of the time. Fire suppression, HazMat, and technical rescue benchmarks have been set at 7 minutes for the first-arriving unit and 10 minutes and 30 seconds for the ERF.

Baseline performance measures for EMS for the last five years is 7 minutes and 47 seconds for the first-arriving unit and 8 minutes and 6 seconds for the ERF. Baseline performance measures for fire suppression are 8 minutes and 3 seconds for the first-arriving unit and 11 minutes and 25 seconds for the ERF. Baseline performance measure for Hazardous Materials is 7 minutes and 56 seconds for the first arriving unit. Baseline performance measure for Technical Rescue is 7 minutes and 26 seconds for the first-arriving unit.

CFD currently does exceedingly well when considering only turnout times. The department consistently monitors and coordinates with dispatch to meet adopted call processing requirements.

CFD actively engages with the development community to ensure circulation and travel for emergency response are considered as part of continued growth.

Fire Department Response Goal: First Unit –
Total Response Time – EMS Calls for Service
= 6 Minutes & 30 Seconds at 90 Percent
Fire Department Response Goal: First Unit –
Total Response Time – Fire, Hazardous Material
and Technical Rescue Calls for Service
= 7 Minutes at 90 Percent
Fire Department Response Goal:

Effective Response Force – Fire Calls for Service
= 10 Minutes & 30 Seconds at 90 Percent
506
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
6 After reviewing the Department’s five-year baseline performance as compared to our established benchmarks, a significant area for improvement was identified in call processing. In some years, call processing times have increased as a result of additional questions being added during ProQA.

These questions were a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. An additional delay was noted in the call transfer time from the primary to the secondary PSAP. Improvements have been identified and implemented. This includes rapid dispatch for certain call types and CFD is working towards establishing a CAD-to-CAD interface.

The second area of concern is the southeast and northwest areas of the City. Continued growth in these areas along with higher density housing has added both distance and increased population to these areas. With Station 6 and another company
now in service, we can expect improved
response times in the southeast once the road
network is improved as part of the various
developments and planned infrastructure
projects. In the northwest, we will be monitoring
station planning efforts using historical
benchmarks for opening a new station. Those
benchmarks include when a new station
response area has call demand greater than 350
calls for service, developed more than 50%, and
response times are exceeding CFD’s
established benchmark by greater than 1 minute.

The purpose of this document is to provide elected officials, cooperating agencies, department personnel and, most importantly, citizens an overview of the assets at risk (people, possessions, homes, businesses, cultural assets, environment, etc.), and the methods the Clovis Fire Department will employ to protect those assets. It is not intended to be a stand-alone document but to be used in conjunction with the Department’s Strategic Plan 2022-2027. While the CRA/SOC provides an overview of risk assessment, deployment of resources, and an analysis of current performance, the Strategic Plan outlines the resources needed to address the current service demands, departmental improvements, and anticipated changes within community. 507
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
7 Location
Clovis is located within northeast Fresno County, approximately seven miles southeast of Madera County. Situated in the northeast quadrant of the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan Area, Clovis is in the midst of the agriculturally rich San Joaquin Valley. Since its incorporation in 1912, Clovis has been known locally as the "Gateway to the Sierra".

Region Geography
Clovis is situated in California’s 10th largest county, Fresno County, which covers an area of over 6,000 square miles in Central California. It is approximately 200 miles north-northeast of Los Angeles and approximately 160 miles southeast of San Francisco. The County is located near the center of California’s San Joaquin Valley and is part of the Great Central Valley, one of the State’s distinct physical regions. The County’s topography is characterized by broad, flat valley floors that generally slope from southeast to northwest; foothills and moderately high mountains (Coast Ranges) in the west; and foothills and high mountains (Sierra Nevada) in the east. Approximately 55 percent of the County is mountainous and 45 percent is valley land. Elevations range from 100 to 400 feet on the Valley floor to 4,000 feet in the Coast Ranges and more than 14,000 feet in the Sierra Nevada. There are two major rivers in Fresno County, both of which originate in the Sierra Nevada, the San Joaquin and Kings rivers.

City Geography
The City of Clovis is approximately 24.36 square miles serving a population of 121,834 as of 2021.

Its service area encompasses the City of Clovis and unincorporated Fresno County, inclusive of the City's Sphere of Influence (31.67 square miles). All lands outside of the City's Sphere of Influence are regulated by the Fresno County General Plan and zoning designations. However, State law requires a city plan for areas outside of its immediate jurisdiction, if the areas have a direct relationship to planning needs.

Clovis consists of three distinct geographical areas: 1) The City, which represents the incorporated City defined as area within the City limit boundaries; 2) The Sphere of Influence, which corresponds to the City's existing Sphere of Influence; and 3) The Study Area, which includes unincorporated Fresno County lands outside of the City's Sphere of Influence.

Immediately beyond Clovis to the northeast are the western foothills of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. The City of Fresno and its Sphere of Influence are located to the southwest of Clovis.

The southwestern portion of Clovis is characterized by urbanized land uses, whereas the northern and eastern portions of Clovis are predominantly rural in nature, comprised of agriculture, rural residential, and vacant land uses.

DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNITY SERVED
508
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
8 Region Climate
The climate varies among the County’s three regions. Summers are long, hot, and dry in the Valley moderate to hot in the Coastal Ranges, and relatively cool in the high elevations of the Sierra Nevada. There is little precipitation in the County during the summer. Winters in the Valley and Coast Ranges are short and mild with light rain in the Valley and moderate rainfall in the Coastal Ranges. In the Sierra Nevada, winters vary from short and mild with frequent rain and some snow to moderately severe with frequent snow. Most of the seasonal precipitation occurs between October and April.

City Climate
Clovis experiences annual average temperatures of 63.2 degrees Fahrenheit and 10.2 inches of rain. While the average is relatively temperate, summer and winter months can bring extreme weather patterns to the region. During the winter, the high temperatures hover around 55 degrees.

Combined with the regional geography and precipitation during this time, Clovis experiences numerous days with dense fog. This fog has the largest impact on transportation where accident rates jump 50%. Historically, Clovis has been impacted by severe freezing during the winter. Most notable were the winter freezes of 1990, 1997/1998, 2001, and 2006/2007. These freezes affected local agriculture and City infrastructure. Estimated agricultural losses in 2006/2007 totaled $1M which does not include the additional financial losses resulting from damaged infrastructure.

During the summer months, the region
receives extended periods of 100+ degrees
Fahrenheit days, well above the national
average. While the average summer
temperature is 90 degrees Fahrenheit, these
extended heat waves affect the medically
fragile, elderly, and animal populations. The
City staffs cooling centers to protect the
vulnerable populations. In addition to heat
waves, the Fresno County Region continues
to suffer regular drought due to lower than
normal snowpack in the Sierra Nevada
Mountains that supplies water for
agricultural use and replenishes the
below-ground water table. Continued
periods of drought are expected to
periodically affect the region.
509
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
9 COMMUNITY BOUNDARIES
Topography
The topography of Clovis is generally flat with very little elevation change throughout the City. It is important to note that the City of Clovis is located within the central portion of California’s San Joaquin Valley (27,280 square miles in size). Although Clovis is generally flat in elevation, the eastern border of the City is beginning to encroach upon the foothill areas that will pose a wildland urban interface hazard in the future.

Transportation Networks
The City is generally broken into a transportation pattern with major streets at the one-half mile mark.

State Route 168 bisects the City diagonally from the southwest to the northeast and provides quick access to other major freeways that serve the central part of the state.

Population
Current population for the City of Clovis is 121,834. Over the last 20 years, Clovis has become the premier choice for housing developers and homebuyers in the Fresno/Clovis metropolitan area.

Clovis has been aided by an outstanding school district that ranks among the best in the US. The City has a reputation as being a safe and friendly community in which to raise a family. However, vacant land is expensive. As Clovis strives to be more than a bedroom community, attention needs to be given to preserving land for job generating activity in order to meet the jobs/housing balance.

Clovis shares a western and southwestern border with the City of Fresno. To the east, Fresno County contracts fire protection to CalFire serving primarily rural and suburban areas and fifteen communities.

Automatic Aid Agency Facts
Fresno Fire Department

Population: 540,000
Land Area: 115 sq. miles
Population Density: Urban
Stations: 24
Daily Staffing: 81
Fresno County Fire
Protection District

Population: 220,000
Land Area: 2,655 sq. miles
Population Density: Rural/
Suburban
Stations: 17
Daily Staffing: 35
510
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
10 511
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
11 Land Use and Development
Adopted in 1993 and last updated in 2014, the Clovis General Plan provides comprehensive planning for the future. It encompasses what the City is now, what it intends to be, and provides the overall framework of how to achieve this future condition. Estimates are made about future population, household types, and employment base so that plans for land use, circulation and facilities can be made to meet future needs. The General Plan represents an agreement on the fundamental values and a vision shared by the residents and the business community of Clovis and the surrounding area of interest. Its purpose is to provide decision makers and the staff of the City of Clovis direction for confronting present issues as an aid in coordinating planning issues with other governmental agencies and for navigating the future. • The Land Use Element provides the central policy context on which to base all land use decision making in Clovis. It is through the implementation of the goals and actions that the future land use pattern of Clovis will continue to be shaped.
• Transportation routes (including the proposed beltway and tiered transportation system), design standards for streets, the transit corridor and current and future traffic levels on city streets are among the issues covered in the circulation section of the General Plan. • The housing section looks at current and future need for housing units, the capacity in the City for additional units, the types of households that will need some form of assistance or special housing and ways to perpetuate existing housing.
• Conservation issues include strategies for an orderly transition from agriculture to urban uses, re-use of water and wastewater, conservation of ground water resources, and commitment to conservation of agricultural lands in a regional context. • Open space and conservation issues include discussion of parks and recreation resources, targeted growth of these facilities and targeting open space to function in a multi-use capacity. • Existing and future noise from traffic and other activities are issues discussed in the noise section.
• The safety section of the General Plan analyzes conditions in the City and surrounding study area that may be hazardous to those who live and work there, such as flood inundation, fire and hazardous materials.

Each of these issue areas have goals, policies and implementation measures designed to provide a safe and pleasant environment in the future. The City of Clovis General Plan contains not only the seven issue components required by state law, but also several chapters that detail the City’s plan for the future. Included among these are chapters regarding public facilities and air quality. Each General Plan chapter covers an aspect of the City's growth and development. Components of each section are interrelated and therefore must be consistent with each other. Taken together, they provide the guidance as a comprehensive planning tool for the future. 512
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
12 513
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
13 Projected Growth
The City of Clovis is within the Top 10 Fastest Growing Cities in California. Over the last 20 years, the City averaged over 750-1,200 residential permits. A majority of the permits were for single family detached residential occupancies. Clovis boundaries are expected to change substantially through continued annexation within the sphere of influence over the next 20 years. From this perspective, increases in population density will require a greater concentration and distribution of resources to meet the demand, particularly in the southeast and northwest areas.

Five years of historical call volume were utilized to identify general trends in community demands for service. In coordination with dispatch, CFD has managed call volume through greater use of auto/ mutual aid agreements and eliminating non-emergency (low-priority) calls for service. With the addition of new personnel to staff Station 6 in 2022, CFD is able to meet the established response time benchmarks in the southeast area. The chart below shows population growth and fire department staffing since 2016.
514
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
14 Demographics
Population
To help anticipate service demand
needs, local resident demographics
must be understood. This section
provides information about the
demographics of the Clovis
community. With continued growth
in geography and changing state
requirements for housing, Clovis is
seeing greater density in population
to the northwest and southeast, as
these areas represent newer
development with more units per
acre.

Age
Clovis’s median age (36) has grown
older and is only slightly less than
the median Californian age (37).

Another attribute, which separates
Clovis from California is age
dependency. Age dependency
compares the number of
dependents (younger than 18 or
older than 64) with the total
workforce population. In the case of
Clovis, that ratio is 74% when
compared to the state percentage of
59%. This variance is largely due to
the number of children ages 0 – 19.

The larger population in Clovis, age
18 and over by sex, are females at
51% compared to males at 49%.

These numbers are close enough to
be considered statistical equals.
515
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
15 Generations
The consideration of groups of
people by generation is also
helpful when analyzing the
community. Generational groups
tend to have characteristics,
which differ from others. Clovis’s
generational population is
comprised of Matures, Baby
Boomers, Gen X, Millennials and
Gen Z. In Clovis, Millennials, and
Gen Z account for over half of the
populace.

Race
Clovis continues to grow in
diversity. The top three racial
groups are White, Hispanic or
Latino, and Asian.

Language
The most common languages
spoken at home in Clovis are
English and Spanish. For this
reason, public education provides
safety information and materials in
both English and Spanish.

Additionally, many other languages
are present within the community.

Households and Families
This data demonstrates key indicators to
understanding the community. In Clovis,
75% of households have family units (1
or more people) that are related by birth,
marriage, or adoption. Non-family
households with one person or two
non-related individuals compose the
remaining 25%.
516
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
16 Income and Employment
The median household income in Clovis is $84,119, which is slightly higher than neighboring communities. Clovis also has poverty levels lower than both California and the US.

Median Household Income
517
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
17 Housing Conditions
By understanding where and how our
citizens live, we can better plan for
emergencies and find programs to help
our citizens address their needs.

Older homes can pose several
challenges. They can lack structural
integrity, have unsafe wiring, and often
don't comply with the most up-to-date
building codes. Older homes can also
pose hazards to the health of residents.

As with other risks, the southwest portion
of Clovis shows a heightened risk for
building age when compared to the rest
of the City. Coupled with a greater ratio
of overcrowded housing units, allocating
both prevention and response resources
are essential strategies to help reduce
life/property loss.

People who live in rented housing units
are often prevented from making
significant updates to wiring or
implementing other major safety
precautions. Renters have to rely on the
property owner to ensure proper safety
measures are taken. At the same time,
property owners have little control over
their tenants' potential risky behaviors.

In addition, there may be more than one
housing unit in a single building, whether
rented or owned, adding even more
uncontrollable factors to a home and any
necessary emergency response. In
Clovis, the percentage of renter occupied
units is less when compared to
California as a whole.
518
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
18 519
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
19 Governance
The City of Clovis has adopted a “council-manager” form of government. The governing board of the Clovis Fire Department is made up of the five (5) member Clovis City Council (Council) that are responsible for the appointment of the City Manager based upon an individual’s executive and administrative qualifications. The City Manager is the administrative head of the City government under the direction and control of the City Council. The City Council may not give direction to or have control of any subordinates of the City Manager. The members of the City Council elect, among themselves, one member to serve as Mayor for a two year term, who performs strictly ceremonial duties and acts as a member and presiding officer of the Council.

The positions of City Manager and City Council are governed by the Clovis Municipal Code that also defines the auspices of the City Manager and the City Council. The Clovis Municipal Code provides general policies that guide the City of Clovis, approved programs and services, and appropriated financial resources.

John Holt
City Manager
Andrew Haussler
Assistant City
Manager 520
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
20 Finance
The City Council for the City of Clovis provides the direction to the City Manager to develop an annual budget that is reviewed and adopted by the City Council. The City Manager delegates the responsibility and authority to the Fire Chief to plan for and budget for the funds to provide fire protection and other emergency services to the citizens of Clovis. The City Municipal Code outlines the budget process. The annual City Budget document provides a plan and the needed funding for the Clovis Fire Department to carry out its mission.

The financial resources that are used to fund Fire Department operations come from the City’s General Fund. There is a distinction between the two types of revenue that make up the General Fund, discretionary and non-discretionary revenues. Non-discretionary revenue has restrictions on its use and the City must use it on the programs for which it was intended. An example would be gas taxes that must be used on street repairs. Discretionary revenues are those that the City can determine, without restriction, how they want to expend those funds. Examples of these revenues include property taxes and most sales taxes. The City provides a detailed summary of discretionary and non-discretionary revenues in the budget document. The Fire Department is primarily funded by discretionary revenue. A Use of Discretionary Revenue summary report is also provided in the budget document. An analysis of Fire Department funding demonstrates allocation of 20% - 24% of the general fund over a 10-year period.
521
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
21 The budget document provides specific budget detail for each Fire Department division including Emergency Operations, Community Risk Reduction, and Administration. This detail includes the previous fiscal year’s actual expenditures, the revised estimate of expenditures for the current fiscal year and the requested budget amount.

The City also charges a one-time development fee for all new units, equal to $1,568 per residential unit. This fee is specifically established to construct, equip, and furnish fire stations and is a source of non-discretionary revenue. The City also collects an annual Community Facilities District fee for new areas of development that is used to fund police and fire deployment. The current rate for 2022 is $265 per residential unit. This fee is divided between fire (35%) and police (65%).

The City’s Finance Department has projected revenue for fiscal year 2022-2023 to increase 4% over 2021-2022. The City has assumed an industry-wide assumption of 13% for revenue growth between 2021 and 2025. For the same timeframe, total expenditures are projected to increase by 10%. 522
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
22 Stakeholder Input Process
Clovis Fire updated its Strategic Plan in 2022 to help
develop this document. This update included input from
individuals both inside and outside of the organization and a summary of the results of the stakeholder input process for the Strategic Plan.

COMMUNITY EXPECTATIONS
Community Expectations
Community expectations were evaluated through
structured interviews and interaction with chief officers, City Staff, key community stakeholders, and sworn
personnel. Beginning in 2014 an external stakeholder
group participated in a multi-day process that included review and analysis of services offered by Clovis Fire along with the fiscal resources available to support operations.

At the conclusion, stakeholders provided input that assisted in establishing response goals, prioritization of services provided, and general feedback. Community stakeholders have been brought back with each update including the Fall of 2021 to revisit
the original results and confirm if they are
still valid today.

Feedback and goals identified by the
community stakeholders in our 2021
session included:
• Maintain current service delivery levels.
• Future development should not
adversely affect the current level of service
for the existing areas of the community.
• Maintain the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) as a valuable asset to the department and community.
• Continue to hire who are well-trained, professional, and courteous. Provide continued education and training to department members to enhance service levels. 523
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
23 Our Mission
Provide for the fire and life safety of the community in the most professional, courteous, and efficient manner possible.

Our Vision
The Clovis Fire Department is dedicated to serving the people of our community and we will work to continue to exceed community expectations. We will provide leadership locally, regionally, and nationally. We will establish and strengthen partnerships and cooperate with allied agencies to enhance our service. We will provide the best service possible within the fiscal opportunities available. We will exercise foresight in planning, preparing and auditing for the safety and well-being of the community. We will promote confidence, trust and self-reliance through personal and professional growth. We will support our workforce to maintain a healthy lifestyle and perform duties in a safe and responsible manner.

Our Values
We Value the Clovis Way of Life Through…
Teamwork Empowerment of our personnel to provide quality customer service Traditions Remembering the past
Innovation Always seeking to acquire knowledge and skill Integrity Adherence to moral and ethical principles
Honor Integrity in one’s beliefs and actions
Respect Deference to the rights or opinions of others
Creativity Transcending traditional ideas or patterns to create meaningful change Courage Facing difficulty without fear
Our Slogan
Prevent Harm, Be Professional, Use Resources Wisely
Our Motto
Service with Pride

GUIDING PRINCIPLES
524
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
24 Risk Assessment Methodology
The risk assessment process utilized a systematic methodology to evaluate the unique risks that are specific to the Clovis Fire Department. This process evaluated risk from two broad perspectives.

First, risk is identified through retrospective
analyses of historical data. Second, risk is
evaluated prospectively providing the necessary
structure to appropriately allocate personnel,
apparatus, and fire stations that afford sufficient
distribution and concentration of resources to
mitigate those risks. This methodology also
provides information to consider alternative
solutions to assist in the mitigation of risks.

Service areas that had little quantitative data, or did not require that level of analysis, were evaluated through retrospective analysis.

Risk Levels
Community service demands were analyzed
by the incident history, type, locations, and
incident frequencies. Within this process, a
temporal analysis was completed for each
major program area and evaluated by station
demand zone and the frequency of incidents.

Community risks were evaluated by each
program area and risks were identified in
each demand zone. This methodology not
only provides for sufficient allocation of
resources to manage the readiness or
preparedness aspects of the deployment
strategy, but also balances the costs of
readiness with an in-depth understanding of
the probability of events through historical
analyses. The combined results of this
process were utilized to classify risk by
severity utilizing a probability and consequence matrix for each program/risk area. Finally, the critical tasks required for each level of risk were identified. An example of the overall probability and consequence matrix is provided.

COMMUNITY RISK ASSESSMENT
525
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
25 Methodology
We collected data directly from CAD and NFIRS and processed that information through two software packages to develop a comprehensive profile unique to the hazards and call types present in the City of Clovis. In this report, we primarily focused our analysis on the five-year period of 2017-2021. We utilized the two distinct measures of call volume and workload. First, is the number of requests for service that are defined as either “dispatches” or “calls”. Dispatches/calls are the number of times a distinct incident was created involving Clovis Fire Department units deployed within the city limits or one of the two neighboring auto/mutual aid partners. Conversely, “responses” are the number of times that an individual unit (or units) responded to a call. Responses will be utilized on all unit and station level analyses, which account for all elements of workload and performance. Calls have been categorized as Fire, EMS, Rescue/MVA, Hazardous Condition, Good Intent/Service Call and False Alarm respectively.

Overview of Community Response Performance
The following illustration demonstrates workload by call type. When accounting for call types over the past five years, EMS service requests accounted for 64% of the total number of incidents. Firerelated calls represented 4% and the remaining balance falling into the four remaining categories.

COMMUNITY RESPONSE HISTORY
Call Volume by Call Type, 2017-2021
Incident Type 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 3-Year
Average
Emergency Medical 5,954 6,142 6,599 6,566 7,134 6,479
Good Intent/Service Call 2,268 2,469 2,253 2,097 2,082 2,234 Fire 447 336 351 386 386 381
Hazardous Materials/Explosion 147 177 193 178 130 165
Rescues & Vehicle Accidents 412 375 467 397 427 416
False Alarm & False Call 603 621 799 647 613 657
TOTAL 9,831 10,120 10,662 10,274 10,772 10,332 526
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
26 The City of Clovis consists of a variety of risks that CFD is routinely called upon to respond to. The service area encompasses nearly 25 square miles, not including areas served through automatic and mutual aid agreements. These areas include both a structural and non-structural risk in this evaluation. Non-structural risks include emergency medical, hazardous materials, technical rescue, water rescue, wildland/urban interface, and natural disasters. Structural risks evaluated included all structures within the service area, major highways and roadways that transverse the area, water, power, communications and other critical infrastructure, as well as items of historical and cultural significance. In order to determine the extent of various risk factors, CFD analyzed the demographics in the area protected, the building stock, historical call volume, and the existing deployment of resources.

Fire Department Services
The Department provides services for the suppression of fires using a minimum of six fire stations, five fire engines fully equipped with water supply, hoses, portable ladders, and various tools such as axes. In addition, a dedicated ladder truck is deployed for operating at incidents where elevated fire streams and rescuing trapped victims from upper floors is needed. There is one Battalion Chief assigned each day that provides command and control activities at significant fires. Finally, CFD provides response capabilities and personnel for wildland fire risks in cooperation with the California Office of Emergency Services.

A reliable and accurate measure of
performance is the fractal or percentile. This
measure is an industry best practice and is
more robust, or less influenced by outliers,
than measures of central tendency such as
the mean or average. Best practice is to
measure at the 90th percentile. In other
words, 90% of all performance is captured
expecting that 10% of the time the
department may experience abnormal
conditions that would typically be
considered an outlier. For example, if
the department were to report an average
response time of six minutes, then in a normally distributed set of data, half of the responses would be longer than six minutes and half of the responses would be less than six minutes. The 90th percentile communicates that 9 out of 10 times the fire department’s performance is predictable and, thus, more clearly articulated to policy makers and the community. 527
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
27 Community Service Demands
Over the five-year period of 2019-2021, the Clovis Fire Department responded to a total of 31,735 requests for service, or dispatches, including auto and mutual aid requests. The number of fire-related calls were 1,122, which accounted for 3.54% of the dispatched incidents. The number of individual unit responses will be more reflective of total department workload since 28% of the responses include more than one unit. Below is a summary of the responses for the period of 2019- 2021.

The number of individual unit responses will be more reflective of the total department workload since 12% of the calls resulted in multiple units dispatched. As summarized below, all CFD units combined made 64,714 responses inclusive of auto/mutual aid support over a five-year period.

Responses within the City of Clovis totaled 54,371 over the same five-year period and reflect assignments made to Clovis units along with any calls assigned to auto/mutual partners necessary to fulfill a first alarm assignment or first due if that unit were closer than a Clovis unit.

Incident Category
All Incidents All Incidents
Percent
First-In
Units
First-In
Units
Percent
Unit
Responses
Unit Responses
Percent
FIRE, EXPLOSION 1,869 3.57% 1,649 3.77% 6,717 10.38%
OVERPRESSURE, RUPTURE, EXPLOSION, 10 0.02% 10 0.02% 18 0.03% RESCUE, EMS 34,967 66.87% 34,906 79.85% 37,392 57.78%
HAZARDOUS CONDITION 913 1.75% 885 2.02% 1,670 2.58%
SERVICE CALL 1,503 2.87% 1,475 3.37% 1,738 2.69%
GOOD INTENT CALL 9,674 18.50% 1,468 3.36% 13,003 20.09% FALSE ALARM, FALSE CALL 3,293 6.30% 3,270 7.48% 4,103 6.34% SEVERE WEATHER, NATURAL DISASTER 1 0.00% 1 0.00% 1 0.00% SPECIAL OR OTHER INCIDENT TYPE 63 0.12% 48 0.11% 72 0.11% Report Totals 52,293 100.00% 43,712 100.00% 64,714 100.00% Incident Category
All Incidents All Incidents
Percent
First-In
Units
First-In Units
Percent
Unit
Responses
Unit Responses
Percent
FIRE, EXPLOSION 1,023 2.17% 973 2.45% 3,360 6.18%
OVERPRESSURE, RUPTURE, EXPLOSION, 9 0.02% 9 0.02% 15 0.03% RESCUE, EMS 32,282 68.57% 32,239 81.25% 34,317 63.12%
HAZARDOUS CONDITION 810 1.72% 784 1.98% 1,392 2.56%
SERVICE CALL 1,450 3.08% 1,427 3.60% 1,653 3.04%
GOOD INTENT CALL 8,208 17.43% 980 2.47% 9,581 17.62%
FALSE ALARM, FALSE CALL 3,241 6.88% 3,221 8.12% 3,990 7.34% SPECIAL OR OTHER INCIDENT TYPE 59 0.13% 46 0.12% 63 0.12% Report Totals 47,082 100.00% 39,679 100.00% 54,371 100.00% 528
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
28 Temporal analyses were conducted to evaluate patterns in community demands for fire-related services. These measures examined the frequency of requests for service from 2019-2021 by day of week and hour of day. Results below show that peak demand for fire calls occurs between 8am – 9pm with a greater call volume on Fridays.
529
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
29 For these analyses, “Fire-Related” incidents are an aggregated category of the various fire incident types available in the NFIRS databases. EMS/Rescue was the most frequent community demand (averaging 17 requests per day), followed by Good Intent (averaging at 5.4 requests per day).

Responses to structure, outside, and vehicle fires totaled 1,194 (averaging about 1.09 per day).

A geospatial analysis was conducted utilizing the community’s historical service demand for fire-related incidents from 2019-2021 and can be found on the next page. These are for all fire-related incidents and not specifically any sub-determinant of fire risk. It is evident that CFD’s fire-related historical risks are concentrated most heavily in the southwest area of the City, and in the Old Town area, served primarily by Stations 1 and 2. Two other hotspots, one in the southeast and one in the northwest are near assisted living facilities. The remaining fire-related incidents are generally distributed throughout the center core of the City with the least frequent events at the perimeter.
530
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
30 Planning Zones and Districts
The County of Fresno and the City of Clovis use the National Grid System for our overall Geographical Information System (GIS) base layer. This layer is in one-mile by one-mile squares.

The Fire Department felt this was too large of an area to effectively monitor, so the department uses quarter-mile by quarter-mile and this makes up our response districts. The department then plots call locations, call types, call count, response data, census tract information, and more within each district. This then enables the department to review past performance, identify trends and look for areas of overall system improvement.
531
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
31 Comprehensive, data-based, quantitative, and geospatial analyses were utilized to objectively evaluate the historical community demand for services by type and severity. Occupancy level data was obtained from inspection results, call history, and Building Department information systems to assess occupancy level risk within the community.

Significance

Percentage of Risk Level Citywide
Low
Minimal potential impact. The occurrence and potential of extensive damage to property and the risk of life loss is minimal.

Medium
Moderate potential impact. This ranking carries a moderate threat level to the general population and/or built environment. Here the potential damage is isolated to the primary structure and there is a risk of life loss.

High
Widespread potential impact. This ranking carries a high threat to the general population and/or built environment. The potential for damage to property is large and possibly beyond the building of origin. The option for life loss is higher and can be multiple victims. 532
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
32 REVIEW OF SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
The first step in determining the current state of the Clovis Fire Department’s deployment model is to establish baseline measures of performance. This analysis is crucial to the ability to discuss alternatives to the status quo and in identifying opportunities for improvement. This portion of the analysis will focus efforts on elements of response time and the cascade of events that lead to timely response with the appropriate apparatus and personnel to mitigate the event. Response time goals should be looked at in terms of total response time, which includes the dispatch or call processing time, turnout time, and travel time, respectively.

Cascade of Events
The cascade of events is the sum of the individual elements of time beginning with a state of normalcy and continuing until normalcy is once again returned through the mitigation of the event.

The elements of time that are important to the ultimate outcome of a structure fire or critical medical emergency begin with the initiation of the event. For example, the on-set of chest pain begins the biological and scientific time clock for heart damage irrespective of when 911 is notified. Similarly, a fire may begin and burn undetected for a period of time before the fire department is notified. The emergency response system does not have control over the time interval for manual recognition or the choice to request assistance. Therefore, the Clovis Fire Department utilizes quantifiable “hard” data points to measure and manage system performance. These elements include call processing time, turnout time, travel time, and the time spent on-scene. An example of the cascade of events and the elements of performance utilized is provided in the figure below. 533
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
33 Detection
Detection is the element of time between the time an event occurs and someone detects it and the emergency response system has been notified. This is typically accomplished by calling the 911 Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). The City of Clovis primary PSAP is the Clovis Police Department, with calls being transferred to the Fresno County EMS Communications Center for call processing and unit alerting. Clovis still has a significant number of structures that are either not monitored by automatic alarm systems or are unprotected by sprinkler systems. A greater opportunity for success would be achieved with nearly immediate detection and notification (alarm) and/or mitigation (sprinkler systems).

Call Processing
This is the element of time between when the EMS Communication Center answers the 911 call, processes the information, and subsequently dispatches CFD resources. As previously discussed, CFD does not capture 100% of all call time intervals from the pick up of the phone line to the time the call is created in CAD. The reason for this is only 76% of all calls are received by the City of Clovis primary PSAP. The remainder are transferred from other PSAP locations such as California Highway Patrol, Cal Fire, or Fresno Country Sheriffs.

Turnout Time
This is the measured element of time between the time CFD resources are dispatched or alerted to the emergency incident and the time when the fire apparatus is en-route or traveling to the call.

Depending upon the call type, the crew may be required to put on additional protective clothing prior to leaving the station. This is why fire calls have longer turnout times when compared to medical aids.

Travel Time
The travel time is the element of time between when the unit went en-route, or began to travel to the incident, and their arrival on-scene.

Total Response Time
The total response time is the total time required to arrive on-scene beginning with the call coming into the EMS Communication Center and the time that the first to last units arrive on scene. 534
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
34 911 Alarm Handling Time Discussion
While the 911 dispatch processing time target is 1
minute and 30 seconds 90% of the time, the
actual processing time may be greater than this
depending on how the call is received. Currently,
when a 911 call is received from a cell phone, the
address information may not be captured or the
geo-coding may be incorrect. When you compare
this to the past when someone dialed 911 from a
hard line, the address was automatically displayed
in the PSAP. Therefore, when a passerby reports a
fire, an accident, or some type of emergency on a
cell phone, the dispatcher is often required to ask a
series of questions to determine the correct
location to dispatch the appropriate equipment.

The measurement for all 911 calls that are received into the Fresno County EMS Communications Center (secondary PSAP) is highly accurate and is measured at the 90th percentile. Call processing times from the Clovis Police Department (primary PSAP) are only measuring emergency calls that they receive, which is still a majority of all calls for service received by CFD. However, because of the difficulty in tracking all calls for service through the many primary PSAP dispatch centers which are then transferred to the Fresno County EMS Communications center, determining total call processing time for all calls is nearly impossible. CFD was able to analyze some of the data and determine an average processing time of 39 seconds for all calls originating in Clovis PD Dispatch. Therefore, all baseline performance measurements for call processing performance are using a plus 39 seconds (mean) of call processing time.

Previously the Clovis Fire Department responded to every call with lights and sirens whether it was an actual emergency or not. The process was rather simplified as compared to today but not very efficient or safe. Today, the Clovis Fire
Department responds to only high priority (1 and 2) medical calls. Statistically it has been determined for minor medical emergencies, the risk/benefit of responding to an emergency vehicle Code 3 is not warranted, nor does it have any impact on the patient’s outcome. Therefore, more screening is
required to determine whether a call should be dispatched as an emergency or not.
535
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
35 Turnout Time Discussion
The NFPA 1710 standard for Turnout Time to structure fires was modified from 60 seconds to 90 seconds in 2010 after extensive industry internal review and testing. Many years ago, firefighters had much less gear to put on (don) before they left the station and they rode in seats that we would consider outside the enclosed portion of the vehicle. In addition, many firefighters did not wear their seatbelts so they could still be putting on protective gear while responding. The modern fire service has taken a more balanced approach between rapid response and the safety of the firefighters.

Today’s firefighters have a greater array of personal protective equipment (turnouts) that must be donned before they enter fully enclosed cabs, are seated, then fasten their seatbelts prior to leaving the station. These extra steps have been quantified into the 90-second Turnout Time standard.

Response to EMS calls does not require the same amount of protective equipment which allows a slightly shorter Turnout Time standard of 60 seconds.

Travel Time Discussion
Travel time within the City of Clovis is fairly
consistent. Streets are laid out in a uniform
manner, well maintained, with most signal
lights incorporating the use of traffic signal
preemption technology. The topography is
essentially flat and weather is usually not a
factor in response times.

The primary constraints for travel time are
traffic patterns, barriers to access and the
growing distance between fire stations and
the location demanding service. Traffic
preemption helps but with areas of
congestion due to activities around school
sites, during peak commute times and after special events, response speeds are negatively impacted. Access is of concern as more developments utilize gates, fencing, and other security measures. Also, high-density development creates narrower streets, which adds more people and less available parking. This often results in people parking in unauthorized areas, impacting response times for large fire apparatus. As the service area grows to the north and east, travel times from existing fire stations will get longer until new fire stations can be built and staffed. 536
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
36 NATURAL HAZARDS RISK ASSESSMENT
The natural hazards risk assessment consists of a vulnerability assessment to describe the impact that each priority hazard identified would have upon the City of Clovis Planning Area. This assessment is an attempt to quantify assets at risk, by jurisdiction where possible, to further define populations, buildings, and infrastructure at risk of natural hazards.

Data to support the vulnerability assessment was collected and compiled from the following sources:
• County/City GIS data (hazards, base layers, and Assessor’s data); • Statewide GIS datasets compiled by CalEMA-OES to support mitigation planning; • FEMA’s HAZUS-MH MR 2 GIS-based inventory data (January 2019); and • Existing plans and studies.

City of Clovis—Natural Risk Profiles
537
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
37 Guidelines for Natural Risk Rankings
Vulnerability is measured in general, qualitative terms and is a summary of the potential impact based on past occurrences, spatial extent, and damage and casualty potential.

Frequency of Occurrence:

1. Highly Likely: Near 100% probability in next year.

2. Likely: Between 10 and 100% probability in next year or at least one chance in ten years.

3. Occasional: Between 1 and 10% probability in next year or at least one chance in next 100 years.

4. Unlikely: Less than 1% probability in next 100 years.

Spatial Extent:

1. Limited - Less than 10% of planning area.

2. Significant - 10-50% of planning area.

3. Extensive - 50-100% of planning area.

Potential Magnitude:

1. Catastrophic - More than 50% of the area affected.

2. Critical - 25 to 50%.

3. Limited - 10 to 25%.

4. Negligible - Less than 10%.

Significance:

1. Low - Minimal potential impact. The occurrence and potential cost of damage to life and property is minimal.

2. Medium - Moderate potential impact. This ranking carries a moderate threat level to the general population and/or built environment. Here the potential damage is more isolated and less costly than a more widespread disaster.

3. High - Widespread potential impact. This ranking carries a high threat to the general population and/or built environment. The potential for damage is widespread. Hazards in this category may have already occurred in the past.

Summary of Natural Disaster Risk
Geologic/Seismic
The Clovis area is subject to relatively low seismic hazards compared to many other parts of California. The primary seismic hazard is ground shaking produced by earthquakes generated on regional faults lying outside the immediate vicinity of Clovis. The northwest-trending Clovis Fault is believed to be located approximately five to six miles east of the City of Clovis, extending from an area just south of the San Joaquin River to a few miles south of Fancher Creek. The Clovis Fault is considered a pre-quaternary fault, or a fault without recognized quaternary displacement. The most probable sources of earthquakes that might have a potential for causing damage in Clovis are: the Owens Valley Fault Group located about 68 miles to the northeast, the Foothills Suture Fault Zone located approximately 75 miles to the north, the San Andreas Fault located approximately 80 miles to the southwest, and the White Wolf Fault located about 120 miles to the south. A maximum probable earthquake on any of the four major faults closest to the Clovis Area would produce maximum ground acceleration of approximately 0.lg, as ground deceleration generally decreases with increasing distance from the earthquake source.
538
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
38 Soil Erosion
Slope stability is not a concern in the Clovis area. Clovis has a natural mild gradient from northeast to southwest. The highest elevation coincides with the Friant/Kern Canal north of Tollhouse Road at 460 feet, with the lowest elevation of 335 feet near the intersection of Winery and Ashlan Avenues.

These flat slope characteristics, which exhibit natural slopes of less than .001 feet per foot, can make the control of drainage runoff difficult. Many natural depressions within the flat topography naturally collect and pond storm water runoff.

Extreme Heat
In a normal year, about 175 Americans succumb to the demands of summer heat. In the forty-year period from 1936 through 1975, nearly 20,000 people were killed in the United States by the affects of heat and solar radiation. In the disastrous heat wave of 1980, more than 1,250 people died.

During the summer months in Clovis, it is not uncommon to experience multiple consecutive days with temperatures exceeding 100 degrees Fahrenheit.

Heat kills by taxing the human body beyond its ability to regulate temperature, resulting in heat exhaustion and heat stroke. Without immediate treatment, these conditions can result in death.

During an extreme heat event, human safety, agricultural crops, and livestock are impacted. The City will continue to provide cooling centers during heat events and provide transportation to the cooling centers.

Cities pose special hazards during periods of extreme heat. Stagnant atmospheric conditions of a heat wave trap pollutants in urban areas and add the stresses of severe pollution to the already dangerous conditions of hot weather. The City of Clovis’ air quality is exacerbated even more since it is located on the floor of the San Joaquin Valley. This topographic condition increases the stagnant atmospheric conditions and trapping of pollutants. Air conditioning can provide relief. However, many individuals and families choose not to use air conditioning due to rising energy costs, placing themselves at risk for heat-related illnesses.

Extreme summer heat has the greatest impact during the day from Noon – 8pm. During the summer months, a greater percentage of the population is potentially exposed to this type of extreme weather due to schools being out of session, potential loss of cooling due to limited electrical capacity, the physiological impact extreme heat has on the body, and the regional specific conditions that negatively influence the air quality. In response to extreme heat events of 2007, the City Implemented Phase II of the Heat Emergency Plan, opening facilities and using volunteer staff from Noon – 10pm to provide cooling for individuals impacted by the heat. 539
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
39 Drought
Drought is a condition of climatic dryness that is
severe enough to reduce soil moisture levels and
water levels below the minimum necessary
for sustaining plant, animal and human life systems. Drought is a gradual phenomenon. One dry year does not normally constitute a drought in
California, but rather serves as a reminder of the
need to plan for droughts. California’s extensive
system of water supply infrastructure – reservoirs, groundwater basins, and interregional conveyance systems – generally mitigate the effects of short-term dry periods for most users.

Since 1976, Clovis has experienced one State declaration for drought within Fresno County and one USDA declaration for crop losses. Extended periods of drought will continue throughout the region.

Since drought conditions are predicted to continue, the City of Clovis participated in the development of an Urban Water Management Plan in collaboration with the City of Fresno, County of Fresno, the Fresno Irrigation District, and the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District. As a regional partner in this plan, Clovis proactively manages water supplies and has policies in place to effectively deliver water to local residents.

Extreme Cold/Freeze
The potential for severe cold or freezing temperatures exists annually. Severe cold/freeze declarations occurred in 1990, 1998, 2001, and 2007. December and January have the greatest potential for extreme cold/freeze with an average minimum temperature of 37.5 degrees. In Clovis, it is not uncommon to have consecutive days with a minimum overnight low temperature of 32 degrees.

Extreme freeze/cold occurs primarily during the
late evening and early morning hours. During
these periods, most people are indoors utilizing
gas furnaces, fireplaces, and blankets to regulate
their temperature. Populations at greatest risk
during extreme cold/freezes are homeless
individuals who cannot find indoor shelter. Public
Safety personnel continually monitored calls for
service related to vulnerable populations such as
the homeless and seniors who might have needed
these services. In addition, Fire Prevention staff performs a wellness check on our mobile home residents during their normal smoke alarm check/installs. 540 AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
40 Flooding
Clovis is traversed by three natural stream systems. Each of these systems is comprised of sub-streams, or creeks, that collect together to discharge to a centralized natural drainage channel.

These systems include the Red Bank, Fancher and Dog Creek system, the Dry and Dog Creek system, and the Pup Creek/Alluvial drain system. The latter is a tributary of the original Dry Creek Channel. These stream systems collect storm runoff from the foothills east of Clovis and convey the runoff through the Clovis/Fresno metropolitan areas to the Fresno Slough, which is located westerly of the City of Fresno.

Many of these channels have been modified over time and have become duel use storm water conveyance channels and irrigation water conveyance channels. Those streams that have not been used for irrigation purposes have essentially remained in their natural state and have historically flowed uncontrolled during storm runoff events. These stream channels have limited flow capacity. In some cases, the historical uncontrolled grading of land has obliterated or severely modified the natural channels to the extent that their flow capacity has been seriously limited. Flooding has been a serious problem in the Clovis/Fresno metropolitan area when these channel capacities are exceeded.

Portions of the City of Clovis, the existing Sphere of Influence areas and the unincorporated Fresno County area have been subject to historical flooding. Such flooding has been documented by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in their Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map(s) (FIRM) as published in 2005 for the City of Clovis and County of Fresno, respectively. The FIS and FIRM show the flooding in Clovis that could occur from a 1% (return frequency equals 100 years) rainfall event.

Other areas of flooding are related to the Alluvial Drain area and the Dry Creek Reservoir with its possible overflow areas. The major inundation areas from potential overflows from the Dry Creek Reservoir affect a majority of the northwesterly portion of Clovis, as well as the northwesterly portions of the current City Sphere of Influence and City boundaries.

The Big Dry Creek Dam impounds storm-water runoff from Big Dry Creek in the Big Dry Creek Reservoir. Big Dry Creek Reservoir is owned and operated by the Fresno County Metropolitan Flood Control District, and is intended primarily for flood control of winter runoff from the Dry Creek and Dog Creek watersheds. The Reservoir has a storage capacity of approximately 30,000 acre feet and a surface area of approximately 3,500 acres. The Reservoir was designed for a 200-year standard project flood, which is a design specification used by the Corps for reservoirs. The maximum height of the inundation pool is 432.7 feet above mean sea level.

Other areas of flooding occur along the Dog Creek Channel alignment and in low depressed areas along the easterly sides of the Enterprise Canal. The City of Clovis actively uses GIS and FEMA FIRM products to assess flood risk and infrastructure mitigation. 541 AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
41 Essential Facilities and Infrastructure
A critical facility may be defined as one that is essential to providing utility or direction either during the response to an emergency or during the recovery operation. FEMA’s HAZUS-MH loss estimation software uses three categories of critical assets: 1) Essential Facilities - those that if damaged would have devastating impacts on disaster response and recovery; 2) High Potential Loss Facilities - those that would have a high loss or impact on the community; and 3) Transportation and Lifeline. Examples are provided in Table 10.

Clovis Essential Facilities
As identified by FEMA HAZUS-MH, are as follows:
• Clovis Fire/PD Headquarters – 1233 Fifth Street
• Clovis Fire Stations
ο CFD 1 – 633 Pollasky
ο CFD 2 - 2300 Minnewawa
ο CFD 3 – 555 N. Villa
ο CFD 4 – 2427 Armstrong
ο CFD 5 – 790 N. Temperance
ο CFD 6—2388 Encino
ο CFD Logistics Center – 650 Fowler
• Clovis Community Medical Center – 2755 Herndon
• Kaiser Medical Offices – 2071 Herndon
• City Hall – 1033 Fifth Street
• Surface Water Treatment Plant - 5805 Leonard
• Sewage Treatment – Water Re-use Facility - Ashlan and McCall 542
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
42 High Potential Loss facilities as identified by FEMA HAZUS-MH are located throughout Clovis.

Clovis works closely with Clovis Unified School District, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District and elder care property owners in monitoring and assessing non-city owned facilities that fall into this category.

Transportation and Lifeline facilities are located in the center and northeast portion of Clovis with State Route 168 being the major transportation corridor through Clovis. The Surface Water Treatment Plant converts raw water from the Enterprise Canal (originating from the Kings River) into a potable water source for the residents of Clovis. This additional water production from the Surface Water Treatment Plant enables the City to turn off a portion of its groundwater wells throughout the year, resulting in the replenishment of the water table. The Surface Water Treatment Plant is capable of treating and delivering up to 15 million gallons per day of potable water to the City’s customers (expandable to 45 million gallons per day).

In addition to facilities necessary to deliver services and ensure public safety, Clovis is home to assets vital to our community’s heritage and economic sustainability. The Natural, Cultural, and Historical Assets and the Economic Assets are key to defining the community, providing employment and maintaining commerce.

Natural, Cultural, and Historical Assets
Natural resource assets may include wetlands, threatened and endangered species, or other environmentally sensitive areas. Historical assets include State and Federally-listed historic sites.

While the City of Clovis has no registered State or Federal historic sites, there are several assets within Clovis that define the community and represent our history. There are three locations that are recognized as Fresno County Historical Landmarks. Those locations are:
• First National Bank of Clovis/Clovis Museum – 401 Pollasky • Carnegie Library Building – 325 Pollasky
• Gibson Home – 940 Third
Economic Assets at risk may include major employers or primary economic sectors, such as agriculture, whose losses or inoperability would have severe impacts on the community and its ability to recover from disaster. The City's economic base consists of retail sales and services and light manufacturing. The breakdown of the Clovis residential employment sector is as follows:
• Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, mining: 2% • Construction: 7%
• Manufacturing: 8%
• Wholesale: 4%
• Retail: 13%
• Transportation and warehousing, utilities: 5%
• Information: 3%
• Finance, insurance, and real estate: 7%
• Professional, scientific, management, administration, waste management: 8% • Education, health and social services: 23%
• Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, food service: 7% • Public administration: 8%
• Other services: 5%
543
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
43 The response area for each fire station is identified as a station district. These districts are a collection of the multiple-fire demand zones that are mapped and split the district into smaller response zones. When a request for service is received through the 911 system, the EMS Communications Center verifies the call location and uses the computer-aided dispatch (CAD) system to identify the required resources to send. The CAD system takes into consideration the type of occupancy and associated risk. Once the call type has been identified, the correct type of predetermined response is dispatched. For example, a fire in a vehicle (low-risk) will receive one engine, with three firefighters. An apartment building (high-risk occupancy) will receive five engines, one truck and one battalion chief, for a minimum of nineteen firefighters.

The Clovis Fire Department has identified risk hazards for each type of occupancy within the City of Clovis. The assessment of each commercial facility was conducted by Fire personnel evaluating seven elements:

1. Premise – Evaluate data related to property use, occupancy type and assessed valuation.

2. Building – Evaluate building data considering exterior building characteristics including height and exposure separation.

3. Life Safety – Evaluate specific elements affecting life safety and the ability of the occupants to leave the building including occupant load, fire sprinklers, alarms and occupant mobility.

4. Risk – Evaluate the frequency/likelihood of an event and the consequence as it relates to regulatory oversight, experience and human activity within the structure.

5. Consequence – Evaluate the range between controlling a fire within the building of origin and a fire that is hazardous to fire fighting activities. Specific considerations included:
1) The ability to control, 2) Hazard index, and 3) Fire Load per NFPA 13.

6. Water Demand – Evaluated available water resources, fire sprinklers and flow availability.

7. Value – Evaluated economic impact or importance to the community.

Once compiled, each element was assigned a value within a range and then applied to a formula that produced a final rank. This calculation used weighting and valuation consistent with the Risk Hazard and Value Evaluation process recommended by the Commission on Fire Accreditation International. Numerical values associated with each rank are as follows:
• Low — (10-17)
• Moderate — (18-30)
• High — (31-42)
Once facilities were ranked, their information was then geo-coded into our GIS system. With this overview, Clovis has been able to look at concentration/density of our fire risk concurrent with data related to five years (2017-2021) of response data. In addition, we can plot these points and add call history data to see if there is correlation between concentration of occupancies and actual incidents.

FIRE EVENTS RISK ASSESSMENT
544
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
44 Results from this analysis placed commercial occupancies into three categories:

High Risk Occupancies: Schools, apartments, hospitals, nursing homes, low-rise buildings, commercial structures, dwellings in water deficient areas, and other high-life hazard or large fire potential occupancies.

Medium: One-, two- or three family dwellings. Approximately 70% of the occupancies within the City of Clovis fall into the Moderate-Risk category.

Low Risk Occupancies: Small outbuildings, park restrooms, sheds, very small drive-by/thru service structures. Fires in these structures are usually handled by a single fire company. 545
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
45 546
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
46 547
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
47 Fire Suppression Capabilities
Firefighters encounter a wide variety of conditions at each fire. Some fires will be at an early stage and others may have already spread throughout the building. This variation in conditions complicates attempts to compare fire department capability. A common reference point must be used so that the comparisons are made under equal conditions. In the area of fire suppression, service-level objectives are intended to prevent the flashover point, a particular point of a fire's growth that makes a significant shift in its threat to life and property. Fire suppression tasks required at a typical fire scene can vary a great deal. What fire companies must do, simultaneously and quickly if they are to save lives and limit property damage, is to arrive within a short period of time with adequate resources to do the job. Matching the arrival of resources within a specific time period is the objective of developing a comprehensive Standard of Cover.

The Four Stages of a Fire
Virtually all structure fires progress through a series of identifiable stages:

Stage 1: The Incipient Stage—This first stage begins when heat, oxygen and a fuel source combine and have a chemical reaction resulting in fire. This is also known as “ignition” and is usually represented by a very small fire that often goes out on its own, before the following stages are reached. Recognizing a fire in this stage provides your best chance at suppression or escape.

Stage 2: The Growth Stage—Where the structure’s fire load and oxygen are used as fuel for the fire. There are numerous factors affecting the growth stage including where the fire started, what combustibles are near it, ceiling height, and the potential for “thermal layering”. It is during this shortest of the four stages when a deadly “flashover” can occur; potentially trapping, injuring or killing firefighters.

Stage 3: The Fully Developed Stage—When the growth stage has reached its max and all combustible materials have been ignited, a fire is considered fully developed. This is the hottest phase of a fire and the most dangerous for anybody trapped within.

Stage 4: The Decay Stage—Usually the longest of a fire, the decay stage is characterized by a significant decrease in oxygen or fuel, putting an end to the fire. Two common dangers during this stage are first—the existence of non-flaming combustibles that can potentially start a new fire if not fully extinguished. Second, there is the danger of a backdraft when oxygen is reintroduced to a volatile, confined space.
548
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
48 As suggested previously, the number of times that fires are controlled before flashover depends on the entire fire protection system and is not solely dependent on emergency response forces. Built-in fire protection, public education, extinguishment by citizens, and even the type of fuel on fire are all factors that affect flashover. Even when fires are not extinguished by firefighting forces, these personnel often provide other services, ranging from smoke removal to the restoration of built-in fire control systems. The objective is all components of the fire protection system, from public education to built-in fire protection to manual fire suppression, are maintained at a level to provide adequate service and the performance of each is periodically evaluated.

Flashover is a critical stage of fire growth, as it creates a quantum jump in the rate of combustion and a significantly greater amount of water is needed to reduce the burning material below its ignition temperature. A fire that has reached flashover often indicates it is too late to save anyone in the room of origin, and a greater number of firefighters are required to handle the larger hose streams needed to extinguish the fire. A post-flashover fire burns hotter and moves faster, compounding the search-and-rescue problems in the remainder of the structure and, at the same time, more firefighters are needed for fire combat operations.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF FLASHOVER

PRE-FLASHOVER
Limited to one room
Requires smaller attack line
Search and Rescue is easier
Initial assignment can handle

POST-FLASHOVER
May spread beyond one room
Requires more and larger attack lines
Compounds search and rescue
Requires additional companies
549
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
49 Probability/Consequence of Fire Event Risk
The relatively low frequency of fire related events experienced within Clovis required our analysis to rely more heavily on the consequences of the events than the probability of the event occurring. For example, according to the Department’s NFIRS final incident typing, the Department annually responded to 80 structure fires or fires in buildings involving cooking or chimneys. The resulting probability and consequence matrix is presented below.

Impact of Residential Fire Sprinklers
In January 2010, California became one of 46 states that adopted a residential sprinkler requirement for all new homes. This was, in part, a result of years of scientific study and lobbying efforts by the National Fire Service and Building Industry. The impact of the new requirement on the Clovis Fire Department will take many decades to fully realize but there are reasonable assumptions that can be made and used in the deployment analysis. There are also some assumptions made by the general public, media, elected officials, etc., that are incorrect and which make it imperative for CFD to continue to provide ongoing public information to keep the public informed on the facts. • Residential fire sprinklers do not cover the entire structure like similar systems installed in commercial occupancies. In residential units there are no fire sprinklers in the attic space. • Fire sprinkler systems are designed to keep fire contained long enough to allow occupants to exit, not fully extinguish the fire. A fire department response is still needed. • Installing both smoke alarms and a fire sprinkler system reduces the risk of fire death by 82%. • Sprinkler systems allow quicker control and extinguishment by the fire department and less time committed for overhaul.
• Fire sprinkler systems do not control fires originating outside the home. • Over time, sprinkler systems will lower property loss ($) due to fire, which will have a positive effect on residential fire insurance premiums citywide. • Sprinkler systems do not lessen the need for fire stations (distribution), but will lessen the need for multiple units responding from the same stations (concentration). 550 AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
50 Fire Event Service Level Goals
The Clovis Fire Department’s response and deployment standards are based upon urban population density and historical demand for services within the community and region. The targeted service level benchmark statements are based on industry standards, best practices and historical response data.

Fires
For 90% of all low, moderate, and high risk fires, total response time, from the receipt of the 911 call in the secondary PSAP to the arrival of the first-due unit, staffed with at least 3 firefighters, shall be:
7 minutes for all areas within the city limits (urban). The first-due unit for all risk levels shall be capable of: rescuing at-risk victims or initiating command, establishing an attack line flowing a minimum of 150 gallons per minute (gpm), and 500 gallons of water carried on the fire apparatus.

These operations shall be done in accordance with departmental standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of responders and the general public.

Effective Response Force Capabilities
The capability of an Effective Response Force (ERF) to assemble in a timely manner with the appropriate personnel, apparatus, and equipment is important to the success of a significant structural fire event. Therefore, it is important to measure the capabilities of assembling an ERF. In most fire departments, the distribution model performs satisfactorily, but it is not uncommon to be challenged to assemble an ERF in the recommended timeframes.

Several factors affect the capabilities to assemble an ERF such as the number of fire stations, number of units and number of personnel on each unit. Each of these policy decisions should be made in relation to the community’s specific risks and the willingness to assume risk.

Time Interval Benchmark Metric All 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 Call Processing 01:30 Count
90th Percentile
105
01:45
15 02:08
39 01:30
20 01:29
16 01:57
15 01:15
Turnout 01:00 Count
90th Percentile
108
01:23
16 01:17
41 01:32
20 01:02
16 01:02
15 01:07
Travel 04:00 Count
90th Percentile
110
04:23
16 04:40
42 05:13
21 03:49
16 03:41
15 03:41
Total Response1st on Scene 06:30 Count
90th Percentile
109
07:01
16 07:26
42 07:16
20 06:14
16 06:48
15 06:00
Structure Fire Calls, Code 3, in Clovis, First Unit at Scene Benchmarks at 90th Percentiles
Total ResponseERF 10:30 Count
90th Percentile
91 11:25
16 11:53
27 12:11
20 10:27
13 10:30
15 10:18
551
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
51 For 90% of all moderate risk structure fires, the total response time, from the receipt of the 911 call in the secondary PSAP to the arrival of the effective response force (ERF), staffed with 16 firefighters and officers, shall be: 10 minutes and 30 seconds for all areas within the city limits (urban). The ERF for moderate risk fire incidents shall be capable of: establishing command, providing an uninterrupted water supply, advancing an attack line and a backup line for fire control, complying with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements of two-intwo-out, completing forcible entry, searching and rescuing at-risk victims, ventilating the structure, and controlling utilities. These operations shall be done in accordance with departmental standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of responders and the general public.

For 90% of all high-risk structure fires, the total response time, from the receipt of the 911 call in the secondary PSAP to the arrival of the effective response force (ERF), staffed with 19 firefighters and officers, shall be: 10 minutes and 30 seconds for all areas within the City limits (Urban). The ERF shall be capable of: establishing command, providing an uninterrupted water supply, advancing an attack line and a backup line for fire control, complying with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements of two-in-two-out, and expanding to a 4-person Rapid Intervention Crew completing forcible entry, searching and rescuing at-risk victims, ventilating the structure, controlling utilities, and filling a safety officer position. The ERF for high risk structure fires shall also be capable of placing an elevated stream into service from an aerial ladder and supporting a sprinkler system. These operations shall be done in accordance with departmental standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of responders and the general public. 552
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
52 The combination of property and life risk determines the fire ground tasks that must be accomplished in an emergency to minimize loss. These factors, although interrelated, can be separated into two basic types: fire flow and life safety. Fire flow tasks are related to getting water on the fire; life safety tasks are related to finding injured/ill persons and providing definitive emergency medical care, or finding trapped victims and removing them from the building. The required fire flow is based on a building's size, structural material, distance from other buildings, horizontal and vertical openness (lack of partitions), contents, type, density, and potential energy (BTUs per pound).

Life-safety tasks are based upon the number of patients in an emergency medical incident or occupants in a fire situation: their location (e.g., a low rise versus high rise), their status (awake versus asleep), and their ability to take self-preservation action. For example, ambulatory adults need less assistance than non-ambulatory. The elderly and small children always require more assistance. The key to the fire department's success at an emergency incident is coordinated teamwork, regardless of whether the tasks are all fire-flow related or a combination of fire-flow, rescue, and life safety. A fire in an occupied residential single- or multi-family structure requires a minimum of eight tasks to be simultaneously conducted in order to stop the loss of civilian lives, stop further property loss, and minimize the risks to the firefighter. The number and type of tasks needing simultaneous action will dictate the minimum number of firefighters needed at different types of emergencies.

The key to any fire department’s success at a fire includes a rapid response and efficient fire scene deployment, as well as adequate staffing and coordinated teamwork. Critical tasks are tasks that must be conducted in a timely coordinated manner by firefighters at structure fires, in order to control the fire prior to flashover or to extinguish a larger fire beyond the room of origin. A fire department is responsible for assuring that responding companies are capable of performing all of the critical tasks in a prompt and proficient manner.

When identifying critical tasks, we are assuming interior firefighting operations are necessary and require the use of protective equipment, which includes personal protective clothing, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), and a minimum of a 1¾” hose line. Additional personnel must be staged to perform rescue functions for interior firefighting personnel, and a command structure needs to be established.

CRITICAL TASK ANALYSIS
553
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
53 Below are definitions of critical tasks that are to be performed at the scene of a structure fire:

Fire Attack: A medium-sized hose that produces 100+ gpm and is handled by a minimum of two firefighters or a larger hose that produces 200+ gpm and is handled by three or more firefighters.

Search and Rescue: A minimum of two firefighters assigned to search for living victims and remove them from danger while the fire attack crew moves between the victims and the fire to stop the fire from advancing towards them. A two-person crew is normally sufficient for most small- to medium-sized structures, but more crews are required in multi-story buildings or high risk structures with people who are not capable of self preservation.

Ventilation: A minimum of three firefighters to open a horizontal or vertical channel. Vertical ventilation, or ventilation of a multi-story building, can require more than three firefighters depending on the size and complexity of the structure involved. Ventilation removes superheated gases and obscuring smoke, preventing flashover, and allowing attack crews to see and work closer to the seat of the fire.

Back-up Line/2-Out: A back-up hose line is used to protect the fire attack crew in case the fire overwhelms them or a problem develops with the fire attack hose line. This function requires a minimum of two firefighters.

Rapid Intervention Crew (RIC): When the first four firefighters are on scene, the two outside firefighters are also known as the 2-Out. When the balance of the effective response force arrives and interior fire attack is continuing in hazardous atmospheres and conditions, a full company is assigned to be the rapid intervention team.

Exposure Line: Any sized attack line or master stream appliance staffed by two or more fire fighters and taken above, below, or next to the fire in multi-story buildings or externally to protect nearby structures with the intent to prevent fire involvement from the radiant heat.

Pump Operator: One firefighter assigned to deliver water under the right pressure to the various hose lines in use (attack, backup and exposure lines), and monitor the pressure changes caused by the changing flows on each hose line. This firefighter also completes the hose hookups to the correct discharges and completes the water supply hookup to the correct intake. The pump operator can sometimes make the hydrant hookup alone if the pumper is near a hydrant (50 feet). However, more distant hydrant locations sometimes preclude this action.

Water Supply: A crew of one or more firefighters who must pull the large diameter hose between the fire engine pump and the nearest hydrant.

Command: An officer assigned to remain outside of the structure to coordinate the fire attack, evaluate results, request additional resources, and monitor fire conditions that might jeopardize firefighter safety.

Safety Officer: This is an officer assigned to ensure that fire department personnel on scene are following department policies and procedures to ensure their safety. 554
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
54 Evaluating critical tasks that need to be accomplished depending upon the risk involved determines the appropriate level of resources necessary to simultaneously handle the tasks of fire attack, search and rescue, ventilation, backup lines, pump operation, water supply and command, all within a goal of 10 minutes after arrival of the first-due unit.

CFD reviewed historical data, existing time standards, and completed several time-measured training exercises to determine which tasks can be accomplished when responding to various occupancies such as a single family residence, multi-family residence, and commercial. This data was then correlated with existing actual fire call tasks and time criteria to validate the Department’s capabilities for completing all critical tasks for a fire outlined below.

Cri&cal Task Necessary at a Low-Risk Fire (Vehicle, Dumpster, Small Building) Task Firefighters Company
A.ack Line 2 1st Fire Engine
Pump Operator 1 1st Fire Engine
Total 3 FFs 1 Fire Apparatus
Cri&cal Task Necessary at a Moderate-Risk Fire (single-family residence) Task Firefighters Company
A.ack Line 2 1st Fire Engine
Total 16 Firefighters 4 Engines, 1 Truck & 1 BC
Pump Operator 1 1st Fire Engine
Primary Search/Rescue 3 2nd Fire Engine
Water Supply/Sprinkler 1 2nd Fire Engine
Rapid Interven4on/U4li4es 2 3rd Fire Engine
Safety 1 4th Fire Engine
Back Up A.ack Line 2 4th Fire Engine
Ven4la4on/Forced Entry 3 1st Truck
Command 1 Ba.alion Chief
Cri&cal Task Necessary at a High/Special-Risk Fire (mul&-family residence or commercial) Task Firefighters Company
A.ack Lines (2) 4 1st & 5th Fire Engine
Total 19 Firefighters 5 Engines, 1 Truck & 1 BC
Pump Operator 1 1st Fire Engine
Primary Search/Rescue 2 2nd Fire Engine
Water Supply/Sprinkler 1 2nd Fire Engine
Rapid Interven4on/U4li4es 4 3rd Fire Engine
Safety 1 4th Fire Engine
Back Up A.ack Line 2 4th Fire Engine
Ven4la4on/Forced Entry 3 1st Truck
Command 1 Ba.alion Chief
555
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
55 The Clovis Fire Department provides Basic Life Support (BLS) emergency medical services (EMS) with automated external defibrillator (AED) certification. All sworn operations personnel are Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) providing first responder service from four fire engines, and a ladder truck. Fresno County Emergency Medical Service provides BLS, Advanced Life Support (ALS), and ambulance transportation services through an exclusive contract with American Ambulance. The City’s 911 primary Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) obtains basic medical information and routes the call to the Fresno County EMS Communications Center for fire unit and ambulance dispatching. Requests for EMS are categorized as either BLS or ALS. All priority EMS requests receive one Fire first responder unit. Most BLS patients are either treated and released or treated and transported by American Ambulance. Most ALS patients are treated and transported by American Ambulance. In total, CFD wholly participates in the delivery of EMS and, at full staffing, has six (6) fire suppression units geographically deployed to meet the service demands and CFD’s current performance goals.

Community Service Demands
The majority of the community’s requests for services are for emergency medical services. In total, approximately 63% of requests for services are for EMS. A summary of all dispatched calls from 2017-2021 is provided below.

EMS RISK ASSESSMENT
556
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
56 The Clovis Fire Department has identified medical risk hazards for occupancies within the City of Clovis. All emergency response units are outfitted with mobile data computers (MDC) that contain computer-aided dispatch premise information for identified occupancies. Premise information might also include annotations for medically fragile patients, high population concentrations, or frequent EMS events. The assessment of each facility was conducted by Fire personnel evaluating four distinct elements:

1. Premise – Evaluate data related to property use, occupancy type and assessed valuation.

2. Building – Evaluate building data considering exterior building characteristics including height and exposure separation.

3. Life Safety – Evaluate specific elements affecting life safety and the ability of the occupants to leave the building including occupant load, alarms and occupant mobility.

4. Risk – Evaluate the frequency/likelihood of an event and the consequence as it relates to regulatory oversight, experience and human activity within the structure.

From that evaluation, EMS risk was defined into three categories:

Low Risk: Non-life threatening (Code 2) medical events that can be handled by ambulance alone with time standards longer than required for life threatening emergencies. Clovis Fire Department suspended response to these types of calls for service in 2008.

Medium Risk: Medical responses that require the use of the following procedures: Traumatic injury, CPR with an AED application, rescue breathing with a bag-valve-mask, uncontrolled bleeding, severe allergic reactions, severe respiratory distress, non-cooperative patients, and altered mental status patients. The time performance standard for the ALS provider is 9 minutes or less at 90%.

High Risk: Response to an incident of substantial size that contains a heavy concentration of occupants presenting a high risk of life loss. While these structures contain built-in fire protection features, many occupants are not capable of self-preservation.

Once facilities were ranked, their information was then geocoded into our GIS system. With this overview, Clovis has been able to look at concentration/density of our EMS risk throughout Clovis.

In addition, we can plot these points and add call history data to see if there is correlation between concentration of occupancies and actual incidents.
557
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
57 558
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
58 559
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
59 Probability/Consequence of EMS Risk
The probability and consequence process used for the EMS risk assessment is derived by the call taking process and call typing at the dispatch center. These call typing determinants are the framework for first responder and Fresno County EMS Ambulance responses. The analysis evaluates the probability and consequence of EMS incidents. The results are presented below.

Similar to preventing flashover in a fire, survival from a cardiac emergency is time driven. The brain can only be without oxygen for a short period of time (four to six minutes) before irreparable cell damage begins to occur. Rapid intervention is necessary to prevent brain death from occurring.

From an emergency medical perspective, the typical service-level objective typically is to provide medical intervention within a six-minute timeframe, as brain damage is very likely at six minutes without oxygen. However, in a cardiac arrest situation, survivability dramatically decreases beyond four minutes without appropriate intervention. Intervention includes early recognition and bystander CPR. The medical industry recommends using the Utstein reporting criteria to capture the following time stamps/points in the cascade of events in an EMS call that fortunately match many of the same time stamps used in tracking the cascade of events for fire calls.

Early defibrillation is often called the critical link in the chain of survival because it is the only way to successfully treat most sudden cardiac arrests. When cardiac arrest occurs, the heart starts to beat chaotically (fibrillation) and cannot pump blood efficiently. Time is critical. If a normal heart rhythm is not restored within minutes, the person will die. In fact, for every minute without defibrillation, the odds of survival drop seven to ten percent.
560
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
60 The shortest possible response times create the highest probabilities of resuscitation. An important evaluation point lost on most agencies is the time crews reach the patient’s side. Often the clock stops when the vehicle arrives or stops at the address. The key to a successful outcome is the point the patient is actually contacted. Consideration of actual patient contact must be made when evaluating total response time for EMS calls; this time period can be substantial and can, most certainly, affect the outcome due to delayed intervention. The following illustration shows the importance of not just rapid response, but rapid response coupled with properly trained employees. 561
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
61 EMS Service Level Goals
The Clovis Fire Department’s EMS response and deployment standards are based upon urban population density and historical demand for services within community and region. The targeted service level benchmark statements are based on industry standards, best practices and historical response data.

Total Response Time benchmark service level objectives for 90% of all moderate EMS calls for service, from the receipt of the 911 call in the secondary PSAP to the arrival of the first-due unit, staffed with at least 3 firefighters, trained to the EMT-D level, shall be: 6 minutes and 30 seconds for all areas within the city limits (Urban). The first–due unit for all risk levels shall be capable of:
assessing scene safety, establishment of incident command, conducting an initial patient assessment, obtaining vitals, patient’s medical history, and initiating mitigation efforts. CFD is also capable of providing first responder automatic external defibrillation (AED).

For 90 percent of all high risk EMS calls for service response incidents, the total response time for the arrival of the effective response force (ERF), staffed with 7 firefighters and officers, shall be: 10 minutes and 30 seconds for all areas within the city limits (urban). The ERF shall be capable of:
providing incident command, completing patient assessment on multiple patients, providing appropriate treatment, initiating cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR), performing AED, and assisting transport personnel with packaging the patient.

EMS Calls, Code 3, in Clovis, First Unit at Scene
Benchmarks at 90th Percentiles
Time Interval Benchmark Metric All 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 Call Processing 01:30
Count
90th Percentile
25,106
01:53
5,079
02:12
5,309
01:58
5,285
01:42
4,779
01:40
4,654
01:43
Turnout 01:00
Count
90th Percentile
25,719
01:27
5,378
01:29
5,434
01:28
5,361
01:25
4,838
01:25
4,708
01:27
Travel 04:00
Count
90th Percentile
25,735
04:59
5,377
05:12
5,431
05:02
5,362
04:45
4,842
04:45
4,723
04:49
Total Response1st on Scene 06:30
Count
90th Percentile
25,790
07:29
5,388
08:00
5,445
07:32
5,371
07:12
4,849
07:02
4,737
07:17
562
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
62 The occupancy risk assessment reviewed commercial and residential occupancies for EMS risk.

While this is helpful for assessing concentration of the medically fragile, EMS incidents can occur just as readily in a home, or on the street and involve multiple patients. Critical tasks for low-risk EMS incidents that typically involve a single person receive a single ambulance response that could be an ALS or BLS ambulance based upon Pro QA processing by dispatch.

Medium Risk: Medical responses including: Traumatic injury, CPR with an AED application, rescue breathing with a bag-valve-mask, uncontrolled bleeding, severe allergic reactions, severe respiratory distress, non-cooperative patients, and altered mental status patients.

High Risk: Medical responses including: Multi-Casualty Incident (MCI), vehicle into buildings with multiple patients, vehicle accidents with pin-ins, bus accidents, trench rescues.

Cri&cal Task Necessary at a Low-Risk EMS Incident
Task Firefighters Company
ALS or BLS 2 1st Ambulance
Total 2 Other 1 Ambulance

CRITICAL TASK ANALYSIS
Cri&cal Task Necessary at a Medium-Risk EMS Incident
Task Firefighters Company
Command 1 1st Engine or Truck
Total 3 FFs & 2 Other 1 Fire Apparatus & 1 Other
BLS 2 1st Engine or Truck
ALS 2 1st Ambulance
Cri&cal Task Necessary at a High-Risk EMS Incident
Task Firefighters Company
Command 1 Ba.alion Chief
Total 7 FFs & 5 Other 1 Fire Apparatus & 1 Other
Medical Supervisor 1 EMS Supervisor
Safety 1 1st Engine or Truck
Triage 2 1st Engine or Truck
Transport 4 1st and 2nd Ambulance
Treatment 3 2nd Engine
563
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
63 The fire department is required to formally define the types of special operations required or expected to be performed in an emergency or other incident. These types of special operations include, but are not limited to, hazardous materials response, confined-space response, technical rescue, high-angle rescue, and water rescue. Regardless of the fire department's defined special operation capability, all firefighters that provide emergency response must be trained to the first responder operations level for both hazardous materials and confined-space responses. Likewise, all fire departments must define their response capability to natural disasters, terrorism incidents, large-scale emergencies, and mass casualty events. The fire department must also determine the availability of resources outside the fire department through Federal, State, or Local assistance or private contractors who are deployed to emergencies and other incidents and the procedures for initiating such outside response. The fire department must also limit the level of response to special operation emergencies to the level for which it has staffed, trained, and equipped its personnel.

Additionally, it must have the capacity to initiate a rapid intervention crew during any and all special operations responses.

Community Risks
Clovis and the Clovis Fire Department have existing hazardous materials risks between the fixed facilities and the transportation routes to move materials. Fresno County Department of Public Health is the administrator of the local Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). The CUPA inspects businesses or facilities that handle or store hazardous materials, generate and/or treat hazardous waste, own or operate underground storage tanks, store petroleum in aboveground tanks over State thresholds, or store Federal regulated hazardous materials over State thresholds. The inspections determine compliance with the California Health and Safety Code, California Code of Regulations, and the Code of Federal Regulations. The CUPA Program achieves compliance through education, community and industry outreach, inspections and enforcement. Once facilities are ranked, their information is then geocoded into our City’s GIS system. With this overview, Clovis has been able to look at concentration/density of our special operations risk throughout Clovis. In addition, we can plot these points and add call history data to see if there is correlation between concentration of occupancies and actual incidents.

The most common hazardous materials reported in storage were diesel fuel, gasoline, and lube oil.

The most prevalent extremely hazardous materials reported in storage are sulfuric acid, ammonia, and chlorine. Wawona Foods uses a variety of hazardous materials for daily produce packaging and storage operations. Wawona Foods maintains an active OSHA compliant storage and safety division that is responsible for ensuring compliance with the regulations applicable to the hazardous materials stored and utilized in production.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RISK ASSESSMENT
564
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
64 Hazardous Materials Risk Assessment
Clovis is in an area that has hazardous materials risk potential from fixed facilities and transportation of materials. CFD utilizes a three-tiered system to respond to and mitigate hazardous materials incidents. All personnel are trained to the HazMat First Responder Operational level for hazardous materials and decontamination, thus making the fire suppression force the first line of response for low-risk events. Low risk events receive a response for early size-up and hazard abatement within their level of training and resources. Moderate-risk events that require additional resources for identification of the hazard, entry, decontamination and medical monitoring are primarily handled by the Department’s Hazardous Materials Team. However, for high-risk and large events that require considerable duration and relief, CFD participates and utilizes all Department personnel and Mutual/ Auto-Aid compliment of HazMat resources including Specialists and Technicians to assemble the appropriate effective response force.

Hazardous material release emergencies can be broken into three categories (low, medium and high risk) within our dispatching matrix, with each category requiring a different number of resources. The risk levels are defined as follows.

High Risk: All large quantity releases of known or “unknown” hazardous materials, incidents where patient(s) requiring full body decontamination from exposure to hazardous materials, materials producing a vapor cloud or other airborne hazard, or damaged chemical pipelines.

Medium Risk: Confirmed spills or releases of “unknown” materials where there are no patients but contamination requires specialized equipment, personnel, testing and possibly evacuation depending on population density/proximity and type of materials identified.

Low-Risk: Low quantity spills that a person trained to the Haz Mat First Responder Operational level can mitigate with no assistance required of a Specialist. Examples include:

Automotive fluids released at a traffic accident, identified abandoned chemicals with their original container, abandoned waste not posing an immediate release hazard, less than one gallon of spilled pool chlorine, etc.
565
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
65 Community Service Demands
Fortunately, the demand for hazardous materials services in Clovis is limited. While there is a potential exposure to hazardous materials risk, the demand for responses is low. This category accounted for 568 unique dispatches from 2019—2021, or 2.14% of the total call volume. Hazardous materials responses are broken down by the following categories and data is reproduced below. 566
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
66 567
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
67 568
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
68 Probability/Consequence of Hazardous Materials Risk
CFD staff completed analyses for the probability and consequence of hazardous materials events. In this case, the risks for hazardous materials are greater than the historical experience. Therefore, the consequence portion of the matrix had greater influence on the risk classification than the probability. All hazardous materials events are relatively low frequency as compared to other community service demands but the consequence of events could be significant. A probability and consequences risk matrix was developed and is presented below. 569
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
69 Hazardous Materials Service Level Goals
Total Response Time benchmark service level objectives are for 90% of all low- and high-risk Hazardous Material release calls for service, from the receipt of the 911 call in the secondary PSAP to the arrival of the first-due unit, staffed with at least 3 firefighters, trained to the First Responder Operational level, shall be: 7 minutes for all areas within the city limits (urban). The first-due unit for all risk levels shall be capable of: isolating the area, provide emergency medical care to any patients, provide initial identification of the type and hazard of materials involved, and establish incident command. These operations shall be done in accordance with departmental standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of responders and the general public.

For 90% of all high risk Hazardous Material release calls for service, the total response time, from the receipt of the 911 call in the secondary PSAP to the arrival of the effective response force (ERF), staffed with 10 firefighters and officers, 4 or more of which are trained to the Hazardous Materials Specialist level shall be: 17 minutes and 30 seconds for all areas within the city limits (urban). The ERF for high risk shall be capable of: providing incident command, basic life support, isolate the area and deny entry, provide identification of type and hazard of materials involved, enter the hazard areas and mitigate risk or secure for clean-up employing the use of Level A or B protective ensembles. These operations shall be done in accordance with departmental standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of responders and the general public.

Hazardous Material Calls, Code 3, in Clovis, First Unit at Scene Benchmarks at 90th Percen&les
Time Interval Benchmark Metric All 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 Call Processing 01:30
Count
90th Percen4le
338
01:59
64 02:04
68 02:08
79 01:44
64 02:05
63 01:57
Turnout 01:30
Count
90th Percen4le
346
01:34
66 01:27
71 01:33
79 01:32
65 01:30
65 01:39
Travel 04:00
Count
90th Percen4le
343
05:37
66 05:54
71 05:42
78 05:07
64 05:10
64 05:46
Total Response 07:00
Count
90th Percen4le
344
07:56
66 08:38
71 08:05
79 07:29
65 07:39
63 08:22
570
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
70 These tables show the breakdown of critical tasks that need to occur within the first 5 to 15 minutes after arriving at a hazardous materials release based on the hazard category:

Cri&cal Task Necessary at a High-Risk Hazardous Materials Incident Task Firefighters Company
Command 1 Ba.alion Chief
Total 10 FFs & 2 Other 3 Fire Apparatus, 1 HazMat, 1BC & 1 ALS Unit
Entry Team Leader 1 1st Engine/HM Spec.

Entry Team 2 2nd Engine/HM Spec.

Back Up Team 2 3rd Engine/HM Spec.

Decon Team 3 1st Engine
Safety Officer/HazMat ASO 1 2nd Engine/HM Spec.

ALS 2 1st ALMBULANCE
Cri&cal Task Necessary at a Low-Risk Hazardous Materials Incident Task Firefighters Company
Command 1 1st Engine or Truck
Total 3 Firefighters 1 Fire Apparatus
Mi4ga4on 2 1st Engine or Truck

CRITICAL TASK ANALYSIS
571
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
71 The CFD Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) Team has several members trained as technicians for the Technical Rescue Program and both rely on and participate with the Countywide Technical Rescue Team. Technical rescue is a relatively broad term and includes responses to a wide variety of incidents such as surface water rescue, confined space rescue, low- and high-angle rescues, and structural collapse. Due to the critical tasking elements necessary for technical rescue events, CFD utilizes a tiered response process that begins with fire resources, then escalates to a regional response. A Department response includes operations level personnel in addition to available technicians. A region-wide response includes additional staffing and resources commensurate with a high-risk fire structure fire response including on-duty CFD USAR technicians and team leaders as well as regional Rescue Team units.

Search and rescue emergencies can be broken into three general categories (low, medium and high risk) within our dispatching matrix, with each category requiring a different number of resources to effectively and safely manage each. The risk levels are as follows:

High Risk: Structure collapse, vehicle into buildings with patient(s), trench rescue, high– and low- angle rescue, and confined space rescue.

Medium Risk: Vehicle into buildings without patients, vehicle accidents with pin-ins, freeway accidents, person(s) caught in machinery, industrial accidents, water rescue.

Low-Risk: Elevator rescue, victim trapped in a car or room of building due to a lock failure.

TECHNICAL RESCUE RISK ASSESSMENT
Probability/Consequence of Technical Rescue Risk
CFD staff completed analyses for the probability and consequence of technical rescue events. In this case, the risks for technical rescue, and USAR technicians, are greater than the historical experience. Therefore, the consequence portion of the matrix has greater influence on the risk classification than the probability. All technical rescue events are relatively low frequency as compared to other community service demands. A probability risk matrix was developed and is presented below.
572
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
72 Community Service Demands
Similar to the analyses for hazardous materials, the demand for technical rescue services is low with the exception of motor vehicle accidents in relation to the primary service areas. From 2017-2021, there was a total of 3,095 search and rescue incidents. Of those, 98% involved a motor vehicle accident of some type. With the improved economy, Clovis is experiencing an upswing in construction, therefore a potential risk for high angle rescues, trench emergencies, and structural collapses. Search and Rescue responses are broken down by the following categories and data is provided below.
573
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
73 Technical Rescue Service Level Goals
CFD’s benchmark service level objectives for 90% of all low-, moderate-, and high-risk rescue calls, total response time, from the receipt of the 911 call in the secondary PSAP to the arrival of the firstdue unit, staffed with at least 3 firefighters, shall be: 7 minutes for all areas within the city limits (urban). The first-due unit for all risk levels shall be capable of: providing incident command, basic life support and minor rescue services such as minor extrications of a patient from a vehicle, or removing victims trapped in a non-operational elevator. These operations shall be done in accordance with departmental standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of responders and the general public.

For 90% of all moderate-risk rescue calls, the total response time, from the receipt of the 911 call in the secondary PSAP to the arrival of the effective response force (ERF), staffed with 5 firefighters and officers, shall be: 10 minutes and 30 seconds for all areas within the city limits (urban). The ERF for moderate risk shall be capable of: providing incident command, provide basic life support, perform most vehicle extrications, or extrication of patients from machinery, filling the position of safety officer. These operations shall be done in accordance with departmental standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of responders and the general public.

For 90% of all high risk rescue calls, the total response time, from the receipt of the 911 call in the secondary PSAP to the arrival of the effective response force (ERF), staffed with 7 firefighters and officers, 3 or more of which are trained to the Rescue Systems I level shall be: 17 minutes and 30 seconds for all areas within the city limits (urban). The ERF for high risk shall be capable of:
providing incident command, provide basic life support, perform complex vehicle extrication, shore up compromised structures, perform trench rescues, filling the position of safety officer. These operations shall be done in accordance with departmental standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of responders and the general public.

Time Interval Benchmark Metric All 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Call Processing 01:30 Count
90th Percen4le
2,943
01:46
317
01:05
299
01:10
331
01:02
377
01:13
325
01:27
Turnout 01:00 Count
90th Percen4le
3,011
01:31
300
01:31
287
01:37
325
01:30
369
01:35
317
01:37
Travel 04:00 Count
90th Percen4le
3,008
04:28
309
04:24
297
04:34
333
04:30
369
04:30
319
04:22
Total Response1st On Scene
06:30 Count
90th Percen4le
1,627
06:29
308
06:20
296
06:31
330
06:19
372
06:40
321
06:37
Technical Rescue Calls, Code 3, in Clovis, First Unit at Scene Benchmarks at 90th Percen&les
Total Response-EFR 17:30 Count
90th Percen4le
49 9:07
9 8:31
11 9:04
14 9:38
9 8:03
6 9:05
574
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
74 These tables show the breakdown of critical tasks that need to occur within the first 5 to 15 minutes after arriving at a rescue emergency based on the hazard category.

Cri&cal Task Necessary at a Low-Risk Technical Rescue Incident Task Firefighters Company
Command 1 1st Engine or Truck
Total 3 FFs & 2 Other 1 Fire Apparatus & 1 ALS Unit
Rescue 2 1st Engine or Truck
ALS 2 1st Ambulance
Cri&cal Task Necessary at a Medium-Risk Technical Rescue Incident Task Firefighters Company
Command 1 Ba.alion Chief
Total 5 FFs & 2 Other 1 Fire Engine, 1 Truck, 1 BC &
1 ALS Unit
Rescue Group Supervisor 1 1st Engine/Rescue Spec.

Rescue Team 2 1st Engine/Rescue Spec.

Safety Officer 1 1st Truck/Rescue Spec.

ALS 2 1st Ambulance
Cri&cal Task Necessary at a High-Risk Technical Rescue Incident Task Firefighters Company
Command 1 Ba.alion Chief
Total 8 FFs & 2 Other 1 Fire Engine, 1 Truck, 1 BC,
Rescue Group Supervisor 1 1st Engine/Rescue Spec.

Rescue Team 2 1st Engine/Rescue Spec.

Back Up Team 2 1st Truck/Rescue Spec.

A.endant 1 1st Truck/Rescue Spec.

Safety Officer 1 2nd Engine/Rescue Spec.

ALS 2 1st Ambulance

CRITICAL TASK ANALYSIS
575
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
75 Comparison of Demand Zones
Each of the six fire demand zones within CFD’s service area were compared for factors that would impact the distribution of resources. A geospatial analysis was completed regarding drive times that incorporated CFD’s current performance and nationally recommended best practices. Drive times from each of the current fixed facility fire stations were created utilizing existing road miles and past performance for first unit arrival at 4 minutes. This analysis suggests that the majority of the jurisdiction should be able to be responded to within 4 minutes for where the majority of the risk is located. Each individual stations 4-minute service area is noted from the existing road networks on the map on the following page. While the geographic analysis is a quality surrogate measure, there are times that the complexity of the roadway system or time of day may provide additional challenges.

DISTRIBUTION FACTORS
576
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
76 577
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
77 Comparison of Workloads by Demand Zone
Another method of assessing the effectiveness of the distribution model is to analyze the demand for services across the distribution model. Workload is assessed at the station demand zone level and at the individual unit level. Analyses illustrate that Stations 2 and 4 were the top demand zones, and each answered 32.46% and 23.38% of the total responses for services. Collectively these two demand zones accounted for 55.84% of the total workload.

Sta&on 2019 2020 2021 3-Year
Average
Sta4on 1 1,131 1,053 1,376 1,187
Sta4on 2 3,277 3,035 2,956 3,089
Sta4on 3 1,680 1,546 1,678 1,635
Sta4on 4 2,102 2,367 2,206 2,225
TOTAL 9,591 9,340 9,625 9,519
Sta4on 5 1,401 1,339 1,409 1,383
578
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
78 Comparison of Workloads by Unit
Finally, unit workload analyses were completed for both comparative purposes as well as for introspection into potential system failures. First, this analysis utilized the summation of individual unit workload from dispatch to the clearing of a call. E42 was dispatched to the most accounting for

33.21% of the runs, followed by E44.

Unit 2019 2020 2021 3-Year
Average
T41 2,150 1,639 2,081 1,957
E42 3,402 3,230 3,191 3,274
E43 2,219 1,922 2,095 2,079
E44 2,211 2,519 2,462 2,397
TOTAL 11,434 10,720 11,284 11,077
E45 1,452 1,410 1,455 1,439
579
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
79 Comparison of Workloads by Unit Hour Utilization (UHU) Another measure, time on task, is necessary to
evaluate best practices in efficient system delivery
and consider the impact workload has on
personnel. Unit Hour Utilization (UHU) determinants
were developed by mathematical model. This
model includes both the proportion of calls handled
in each major service area (Fire, EMS, Special
Operations, and Service) and total unit time on task
for these service categories from 2019—2021. The
resulting UHU’s represent the percentage of the
work period (24 hours) that is utilized responding to
requests for service.

Historically, the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) and International City Managers Association (ICMA) have recommended that 24-hour units utilize 0.25, or 25% workload as an upper threshold. In other words, this recommendation would have personnel spend no more than six hours per day on emergency incidents. These thresholds take into consideration the necessity to accomplish non-emergency activities such as training, health and wellness, public education, and fire and community risk reduction inspections.

Analysis showed the most utilized Clovis Fire
Department units were E42 and E44. The least
utilized unit was E45. All unit utilizations were below 20%. This can be partly contributed to the relatively
short average time on task of 22 minutes.

Emergency related workload is a factor of community
demands for service and is not a reflection of internal policies or non-emergency duties. Any changes to
the current system would require workload to be
redistributed across the deployed units. This analysis
demonstrates that considerable capacity exists to
absorb additional work.
580
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
80 Resiliency
A reliable and consistent response system is key to providing equitable service to customers in their time of need. To ensure adopted response time goals are consistent regardless of location, CFD took into consideration that the response systems will be stressed from time to time. For example, a significant event – like an MCI or multi-family unit fire – will temporarily overwhelm the system. But, it is important for the system to quickly recover to a state of normalcy. To help ensure a dependable system, the CFD considered five factors:

1. Reliability

2. Availability

3. Capabilities (knowledge, skills, training, etc.)

4. Capacity (resources)

5. Resiliency (resistance, absorption, restoration)
To measure availability, this table identifies, expressed as a percentage, the total amount of time committed by each Clovis resource by year divided by the total amount of time in the year.

These tables identify the average duration of committed times by each Clovis resource by year.

Unit 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
E41 2.6% 2.7%
E42 7.5% 6.9% 8.4% 7.8% 8.4% 7.8%
E43 4.3% 3.6% 4.8% 4.4% 5.2% 4.4%
E44 5.7% 4.8% 5.5% 6.0% 6.2% 5.7%
E45 3.5% 3.0% 3.9% 3.7% 4.0% 3.6%
T41 4.1% 3.9% 4.5% 4.0% 2.6% 3.8%
Total 5.0% 4.4% 5.4% 4.3% 5.8% 5.0%
Unit 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
E41 0:13:21 0:13:13
E42 0:12:30 0:11:22 0:13:08 0:13:09 0:13:57 0:12:49
E43 0:12:28 0:10:54 0:11:58 0:12:05 0:13:02 0:12:08
E44 0:14:44 0:12:51 0:13:31 0:13:45 0:14:45 0:13:56
E45 0:14:53 0:12:39 0:14:19 0:14:11 0:14:27 0:14:07
T41 0:12:22 0:12:17 0:12:28 0:13:04 0:13:00 0:12:36
Total 0:13:13 0:11:54 0:13:01 0:13:13 0:13:51 0:13:04
581
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
81 Capacity
Once capacity is exceeded, the need for automatic or mutual aid from neighboring jurisdictions is required. At no time should auto or mutual aid be a primary means to service Clovis. This table identifies the frequency with which Clovis units are drawn down by year at each level of drawdown.

Note that there are instances where a unit is dispatched to a new incident while still committed, then cleared shortly thereafter. This explains the commitment of six resources simultaneously and tends to occur disproportionately during busy times.

Description of First-Arriving Unit Reliability
The size of the area that a station covers, the number of calls, the types of calls, and the population density all affect response reliability. The more densely populated, the more likely a second-due call will occur. An analysis of current response data can reveal variations in the response reliability among stations. The chart below tracks response reliability by analyzing the total call volume for a particular fire first-due area and then tracks the number of additional calls occurring within that area while that first-due unit is still on a call.

This table identifies the sum of all times that Clovis units are drawn down by year at each level of drawdown.

Drawdown
Status 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
0 7,280 7,305 7,727 7,525 7,638 37,475
1 9,286 9,209 10,147 9,614 10,135 48,391
2 2,423 2,295 2,912 2,552 3,057 13,239
3 587 531 676 631 754 3,179
4 247 216 297 287 303 1,350
5 77 78 118 119 135 527
6 - 2 5 - 26 33
Total 19,900 19,636 21,882 20,728 22,048 104,194
Drawdown 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
1 0:04:23 0:04:18 0:04:25 0:04:28 0:04:35 0:04:26
2 0:04:27 0:04:27 0:04:29 0:04:34 0:04:43 0:04:32
3 0:04:37 0:04:31 0:04:34 0:04:50 0:04:46 0:04:41
4 0:05:10 0:04:29 0:04:05 0:04:46 0:05:25 0:04:51
5 0:05:04 0:03:51 0:04:52 0:05:54 0:04:33 0:05:03
6 0:00:00 0:05:07 0:08:49 0:00:00 0:04:43 0:05:17
Total 0:04:24 0:04:20 0:04:26 0:04:30 0:04:37 0:04:28
582
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
82 Description of First Arriving Unit Reliability
Response reliability is defined as the probability that the required amount of staffing and apparatus will be available when a fire or emergency call is received. The response reliability of the fire department would be 100 percent if every piece of its apparatus were available every time an emergency call was received, there was no traffic, no bad weather, access was not obstructed, etc.

In reality, there are times when a call is received for a particular company, but that company is already on another call. This requires a substitute (second-due) Company to be assigned from another station. As the number of emergency calls per day increases, so does the probability that a needed piece of apparatus will already be busy when a call is received. Consequently, the response reliability of the fire department for that Company decreases, which will impact on department travel times to emergencies.

As seen, Clovis Fire Department units are reliable for calls within the their first-due response areas over 90% of the time.
583
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
83 Additional Unit Demands
Within California, the Master Mutual Aid System operates to provide firefighting and support capabilities for a variety of events including wildfires, landslides, earthquakes, and other major events. In addition, the system supports regional, county, and inter-agency agreements to ensure lives and property are protected. As a fire agency within Fresno County, Clovis provides automatic aid within a one-mile service area outside of the Clovis boundaries. Most often, those calls support Fresno City Fire Department or Fresno County Fire Protection District. Our partner agencies also provide coverage within the City of Clovis boundaries when our resources may be deployed on other calls. Requests outside of the automatic aid area are handled through mutual aid agreements that define the scope of services and process by which those calls will be handled. To ensure mutual and automatic aid calls don’t create service gaps in either jurisdiction, regular monitoring of aid received or given is conducted. The chart below demonstrates the ratio and distribution of auto/mutual aid support with our partner agencies from 2017-2021.
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 5-Year
Fresno County - Received 272 265 322 234 313 281
Fresno County - Provided 285 239 283 217 280 261
Fresno City - Received 250 233 310 205 208 241
Fresno City - Provided 650 592 707 605 881 687
OES - Provided 74 49 34 65 44 53
584
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
84 Concentration of Risks by Demand Zone
Analyses were conducted to describe and measure the relative concentration of risks in each of the fire station demand zones. Therefore, a station demand zone risk matrix was developed to quantitatively evaluate the relative risk by including measures for the frequency of moderate and high risk occupancies in each fire demand zone that are directly correlated to the necessity of higher concentrations of resources. In addition, several measures that both serves the distribution aspect of the risk evaluation, but also contributes to the need for higher concentrations of resources. For example, a higher call volume may serve to drive the need for additional resources to cover the community’s demand. The variables included in the risk matrix were assessment of occupancy type, patient ambulatory status, fire protection system, occupancy load and economic impact. All measures were weighted equally.

CONCENTRATION FACTORS
585
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
85 586
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
86 Insurance Services Office (ISO) Grading Schedule
For a broad spectrum of commercial and personal lines of insurance, ISO provides statistical, actuarial, underwriting, claims information and analyses; consulting and technical services; policy language; information about specific locations and communities; fraud-identification tools; and data processing. In the United States and around the world, ISO serves insurers, reinsurers, agents, brokers, self-insurers, risk managers, insurance regulators, and other government agencies.

Fire remains one of the leading causes of property loss. A community’s efforts to mitigate those losses before, during, or after a fire are of great importance to insurers. For more than 30 years, ISO has used the Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS) to review the firefighting capabilities of individual communities helping to provide the insurance industry with information on a community’s ability to suppress and limit fire losses. The FSRS develops a numerical grading, ISO’s Public Protection Classification (PPC), to help insurers differentiate the varying levels of fire protection.

Class 1 represents the best public protection and Class 10 indicates no recognized protection.

The Fire Suppression Rating Schedule
In December 2012, ISO developed a Revised Fire Suppression Rating Schedule with changes that focus on areas that have a proven effect on fire suppression and prevention, as well as revisions that align the schedule’s requirements with those of nationally accepted standards. The schedule now recognizes proactive efforts to reduce fire risk and frequency.

The revised FSRS makes increased reference to the national consensus standards of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), and Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials International (APCO). Using feedback from these organizations and many other industry associations, ISO revised the PPC evaluation to make it more accurately reflect modern fire prevention and suppression capabilities. By incorporating more direct references to national consensus standards, ISO shows that it doesn’t just write standards independently, but uses recognized fire suppression and prevention practices as the basis for their PPC evaluations.

The new schedule continues to evaluate three major categories of fire suppression: fire department, emergency communications, and water supply. In addition, it includes a new Community Risk Reduction section that recognizes community efforts to reduce losses through fire prevention, public fire safety education, and fire investigation.

INDUSTRY STANDARDS ON MEASURING PERFORMANCE
587
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
87 The addition of the new risk reduction section represents a major shift in emphasis in the FSRS, giving incentives to communities that strive to reduce fire severity proactively through a structured program of fire prevention activities. Examples of fire prevention programs include fire prevention public education, certificate of occupancy inspections, and inspections of fire prevention equipment.

The total credit points for the existing three major categories remain unchanged at a total of 100 points, but ISO has increased or decreased the point weights for some sections. The total credit points are:

Fire Department: 50+ points
Emergency Communications (formerly “Fire Alarm”): 10 points Water Supply: 40 points

The Community Risk Reduction section has a weight of 5.5 points, resulting in a revised 105.5+ available points out of 100. The inclusion of the new section with its extra points allows recognition of communities that include effective fire prevention practices without applying undue penalty for those that haven’t yet adopted such measures.

There’s been growing involvement in community efforts to limit losses before they happen, led largely by fire departments and their personnel. It’s not easy to quantify the efforts made toward fire prevention and fire safety education, but there is enough anecdotal evidence to indicate that the more done to prevent a fire, the less likely a fire will happen or that it will be a major event.

Summary of ISO Schedule
All of these categories are processed through a formula that summarizes a city’s fire protection capabilities into a numerical Class:

The City of Clovis was last evaluated in December 2019 and received an overall score of 88.12, maintaining our rating at Class 2. The City has experienced a steady improvement in its fire protection rating over the past 25 years. 588
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
88 As development within Clovis continues to expand, demand for service in the new areas of development will eventually grow to the level that a new fire station will be needed. It is important to develop a set of objective criteria in advance of the need for the station so that expectations of the fire department, City Council, the community, and other stakeholders are all aligned and pre-established. In the absence of consensus on a plan, one high profile fire or medical emergency could create political strife that may cause the stakeholders to make decisions based on emotions and not an objective risk management model.

The following matrix outlines the measurable benchmarks that will drive the decision making process for future fire stations:

Step 1: New Fire Station Location Identification
The location (or possible locations) for the proposed station will be made after each update to the General Plan. Note: This step was completed in Fall 2014 with the adoption of the updated General Plan.

Step 2: Acquisition of Land for New Fire Station
When the area that will be serviced by the proposed fire station reaches 100 calls for service, the City will begin the land acquisition process.

Step 3: Design New Fire Station
When two or more of the following benchmarks are reached, the design phase for the new fire station will begin:
• Area served by the proposed fire station receives 300 or more calls for service per year (rolling 365).
• The First-In performance of adjacent existing fire stations drops below 80%. • Development with the proposed service area exceeds 45%. (percentage of development is based on a total build out of 9,000 residences, plus commercial occupancies).

Step 4: Build and Staff New Fire Station
When two or more of the following benchmarks are reached, the build and staff phase for the new fire station will begin:
• Area served by the proposed fire station receives 500 or more calls for service per year (rolling 365).
• The First-In total response time performance of adjacent existing fire stations drops below 75%.
• Development with the proposed service area exceeds 55%.

FIRE STATION NEEDS ANALYSIS
589
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
89 A critical factor in developing these Standards of Cover is to look at the overall system to see if it is meeting the established service level objectives. It is common for fire and EMS responses within distinctive geographic areas be built upon the first-response areas of the fire stations located throughout the city. This approach allows the fire department to analyze the workload and measure the performance of those stations based upon the identified service level objectives. By doing so it will assist the department to identify any areas of weakness, where additional stations may be warranted, or additional companies should be placed in service based upon the workload.

The following is a breakdown of each CFD station which provides the station’s address, equipment housed at that station, and an analysis of the Companies’ first-in response area.

Fire Headquarters
1233 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612
Apparatus
Battalion Chief Pickup Truck (3) - Staffed with one person

FIRE STATION COVERAGE
590
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
90 Station 1
633 Pollasky Avenue
Clovis, CA 93612
Apparatus
Truck 41—Staffed with three personnel
Truck 241—Reserve
G.E.M. Car (special events only)
1936 Ford (public education events only)
591
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
91 Station 2
2300 Minnewawa Avenue
Clovis, CA 93612
Apparatus
Engine 42—Staffed with three personnel
HazMat 40—Cross Staffed
Engine 242—Reserve
592
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
92 Station 3
555 N. Villa Avenue
Clovis, CA 93612
Apparatus
Engine 43—Staffed with three personnel
Engine 243—Reserve
593
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
93 Station 4
2427 Armstrong Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611
Apparatus
Engine 44—Staffed with three personnel
Water Tender 40—Cross Staffed
Decon Trailer
USAR Trailer
594
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
94 Station 5
790 N. Temperance Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611
Apparatus
Engine 45—Staffed with three personnel
OES-276—Cross Staffed
Rescue 40—Cross Staffed
595
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
95 Station 6
2388 Encino
Clovis, CA 93619
Apparatus
Engine 46—Staffed with three personnel
Brush Engine 40—Cross Staffed
596
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
96 Clovis, California
Populaon
Popula4on es4mates, July 1, 2016, (V2016) NA
Popula4on es4mates, July 1, 2015, (V2015) 104180
Popula4on es4mates base, April 1, 2010, (V2016) NA
Popula4on es4mates base, April 1, 2010, (V2015) 95699
Popula4on, percent change - April 1, 2010 (es4mates base) to July 1, 2016, (V2016) NA Popula4on, percent change - April 1, 2010 (es4mates base) to July 1, 2015, (V2015) 8.9 Popula4on, Census, April 1, 2010 95631
Age and Sex
Persons under 5 years, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) X Persons under 5 years, percent, April 1, 2010 7.2
Persons under 18 years, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) X Persons under 18 years, percent, April 1, 2010 28.1
Persons 65 years and over, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) X Persons 65 years and over, percent, April 1, 2010 10.6
Female persons, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) X
Female persons, percent, April 1, 2010 51.8
Race and Hispanic Origin
White alone, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) (a) X
White alone, percent, April 1, 2010 (a) 70.9
Black or African American alone, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) (a) X Black or African American alone, percent, April 1, 2010 (a) 2.7 American Indian and Alaska Na4ve alone, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) (a) X American Indian and Alaska Na4ve alone, percent, April 1, 2010 (a) 1.4 Asian alone, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) (a) X
Asian alone, percent, April 1, 2010 (a) 10.7
Na4ve Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) (a) X Na4ve Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, percent, April 1, 2010 (a) 0.2 Two or More Races, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) X
Two or More Races, percent, April 1, 2010 4.8
Hispanic or La4no, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) (b) X Hispanic or La4no, percent, April 1, 2010 (b) 25.6
White alone, not Hispanic or La4no, percent, July 1, 2015, (V2015) X White alone, not Hispanic or La4no, percent, April 1, 2010 57.5 Populaon Characteriscs
Veterans, 2011-2015 5983
Foreign born persons, percent, 2011-2015 11.4
Housing
Housing units, July 1, 2015, (V2015) X
Housing units, April 1, 2010 35306
Owner-occupied housing unit rate, 2011-2015 60.2
Median value of owner-occupied housing units, 2011-2015 247700 Median selected monthly owner costs -with a mortgage, 2011-2015 1856

APPENDIX
597
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
97 Median selected monthly owner costs -without a mortgage, 2011-2015 495 Median gross rent, 2011-2015 1068
Building permits, 2015 X
Families and Living Arrangements
Households, 2011-2015 34512
Persons per household, 2011-2015 2.90
Living in same house 1 year ago, percent of persons age 1 year+, 2011-2015 85.3 Language other than English spoken at home, percent of persons age 5 years+, 2011-2015 23.6 Educaon
High school graduate or higher, percent of persons age 25 years+, 2011-2015 88.9 Bachelor's degree or higher, percent of persons age 25 years+, 2011-2015 29.5 Health
With a disability, under age 65 years, percent, 2011-2015 8.5 Persons without health insurance, under age 65 years, percent 11.6 Economy
In civilian labor force, total, percent of popula4on age 16 years+, 2011-2015 64.1 In civilian labor force, female, percent of popula4on age 16 years+, 2011-2015 58.2 Total accommoda4on and food services sales, 2012 ($1,000) (c) 167154 Total health care and social assistance receipts/revenue, 2012 ($1,000) (c) 376455 Total manufacturers shipments, 2012 ($1,000) (c) D
Total merchant wholesaler sales, 2012 ($1,000) (c) 189912 Total retail sales, 2012 ($1,000) (c) 1496311
Total retail sales per capita, 2012 (c) 15171
Transportaon
Mean travel 4me to work (minutes), workers age 16 years+, 2011-2015 20.8 Income and Poverty
Median household income (in 2015 dollars), 2011-2015 62666 Per capita income in past 12 months (in 2015 dollars), 2011-2015 28686 Persons in poverty, percent 13.8
Businesses
Total employer establishments, 2014 X
Total employment, 2014 X
Total annual payroll, 2014 ($1,000) X
Total employment, percent change, 2013-2014 X
Total nonemployer establishments, 2014 X
All firms, 2012 7100
Men-owned firms, 2012 3515
Women-owned firms, 2012 2835
Minority-owned firms, 2012 2616
Nonminority-owned firms, 2012 4151
Veteran-owned firms, 2012 524
Nonveteran-owned firms, 2012 6268
Geography
Popula4on per square mile, 2010 4108.2
Land area in square miles, 2010 23.28

APPENDIX
598
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
98 Category
Problem Nature Descrip&on Response Priority CAD Code Incident Type CFD Aid Aid-Automa4c Aid Auto Aid 65A4 100 1E or 1T
Aid-Mutual Aid Mutual Aid 65A3 BC Approval BC Approval
AircraK AircraK-Alert I AircraK Emergency 51C2 124 N/A
AircraK-Alert II AircraK Emergency 51C1 125 N/A
AircraK-Alert III AircraK Emergency 51D1 128 N/A
AircraK-Crash (On FYI) AircraK Emergency 51D1 128 N/A
AircraK-Crash (Off FYI) Fire 80 135 4E, 1T, 1BC
AircraK-Emergency Landing Fire 81 135 N/A
Alarms Alarm-CO Alarm (No Pts) Special Duty 086
Alarm-CO Alarm (No
Pts) 1E or 1T
Alarm-Commercial S4ll Alarm 52C3 145 1E or 1T
Alarm-Commercial with
Reset Special Duty 52C3R
Alarm-Commercial
with Reset No CFD Response
Alarm-Residen4al S4ll Alarm 52B1 101 1E or 1T
Alarm-Residen4al with
Reset Special Duty 52B2R
Alarm-Residen4al
with Reset No CFD Response
Alarm-Tamper Alarm Special Duty 52B5T
Alarm-Tamper
Alarm 1E or 1T
Alarm-Tes4ng No Fire Response 25 No Fire Response N/A
Alarm-Trouble Alarm No Fire Response 087
Alarm-Trouble
Alarm No CFD Response
Ci4zen Assist
Ci4zen Assist-Animal
Problem In Service Detail 53A3 126 1E or 1T
Ci4zen Assist-Bees Special Duty 53A3B 137 1E or 1T
Ci4zen Assist-Other Special Duty 53A2 100 1E or 1T
Ci4zen Assist-Pt Locked
in Vehicle
Emergency Call
(Summer) 53B1 126 1E or 1T
Special Duty (Winter) 53B1 126 1E or 1T
Electrical
Electrical-Arcing in Structure S4ll Alarm 55B1 100 1E or 1T Electrical-Arcing Power
Lines Special Duty 55A1 102 1E or 1T
Electrical-Arcing Power
Lines with Hazards Special Duty 55C2 100 1E or 1T
Electrical-Power Lines
Down Emergency Call 55B2 100 1E or 1T
EMS Medical Aid Emergency Call 1E or 1T
Vehicle Accident Emergency Call 1E or 1T
Vehicle Accident-Pin In /
Rollover Emergency Call 1E, 1T, 1 BC
Vehicle Accident - Freeway Emergency Call 1E, 1E or 1T, 1BC Vehicle into a Building –
with injury Emergency Call 2E, 1T, Rescue*, 1BC
Industrial Accident Emergency Call 1E, 1T, 1BC

APPENDIX
599
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
99 Fire Fire-Apartment Fire 69D4 Fire-Apartment 4E, 1T, 1E or 1T 1BC Fire-Commercial Fire 69D3 Fire-Commercial 4E, 1T, 1E or 1T 1BC Fire-Residen4al Fire 69D5 Fire-Residen4al 3E, 1T, 1E or 1T 1BC Fire-Out Building Fire 69D09 Fire-Out Bldg Fire 3E, 1T, 1E or 1T 1BC Fire-Outside S4ll Alarm 67D3 115 1E or 1T
Fire-Oven Fire
(Contained) S4ll Alarm 69C1
Fire-Oven Fire
(Contained) 1E or 1T
Fire-Vegeta4on (Small) S4ll Alarm 67D2 129 2E, 1BC
Fire-Vegeta4on (Large) S4ll Alarm 67D1 106 3E, 1BC
Fire-Vehicle S4ll Alarm 71C1 100 1E or 1T
Fire-Warming Special Duty 67B3 100 1E or 1T
Gas Leak
Gas Leak-Fuel Spill/Leak
(Small) Special Duty 59B1 100 1E or 1T
Gas Leak-Fuel Spill/Leak
(Large) Emergency Call 59C1 160 1E,1T, 1BC
Gas Leak-Natural Gas
Leak (Inside) Emergency Call 60C1 105 1E or 1T
Gas Leak-Natural Gas
Leak (Outside) Special Duty 60B1 100 1E or 1T
Gas Leak-Natural Gas
(Rupture) Emergency Call 60D4 139 1E, 1E or 1T, 1BC
HazMat Abandoned Waste Special Duty 61A1 112 1E or 1T
HazMat HazMat 61D1 161
2E, 1E or 1T, HMRT*,
1BC
Inves4ga4on
Inves4ga4on-Fire Reported Out Special Duty 69C2 100 1E or 1T Inves4ga4on-Odor
Smoke (Inside/Outside) S4ll Alarm 68A2 100 1E or 1T
Inves4ga4on-Odor Gas
(Outside) Special Duty 60B2 100 1E or 1T
Inves4ga4on-Smoke
(Outside) S4ll Alarm 68C1 100 1E or 1T
Inves4ga4on-Smoke
(Unk Loca4on) Special Duty 68A1 100 1E or 1T
Inves4ga4on-Strange
Odor w/o Pts Special Duty 66A1 116 1E or 1T
Inves4ga4on-Strange
Odor with Pts HazMat 66C1 136 1E or 1T
Category
Problem Nature Descrip&on Response Priority CAD Code Incident Type CFD

APPENDIX
600
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
100
Rescue Rescue-Building Collapse Rescue 54B1 132 2E, 1T, Rescue*, 1BC Rescue-Confined Space Rescue 54D1 108 2E, 1T, Rescue*, 1BC Rescue-Entrapment Rescue 58D1 108 2E, 1T, Rescue*, 1BC
Rescue-High Angle Rescue 62D1 150 2E, 1T, Rescue*, 1BC
Rescue-Jumper Emergency Call 089 Rescue-Jumper 1E, 1T, 1BC Rescue-Stuck in Elevator Special Duty 56A1 126 1E or 1T Rescue-Water Rescue 140 1E, 1T, Rescue, 1BC
Train Train-Accident Medical Aid 70D10 148 NA
Train-Derailment Hazmat 70D4 138 NA
Vehicle
Vehicle-Vehicle into a
Building - Non-Injury Emergency 53B4 117 1E, 1T, Rescue, 1BC Water Problem
Water Problem-Knocked
Off Hydrant Special Duty 53O3 127 1E or 1T
Water Problem-Hydrant
Leak In Service Detail 53O6 In Service Detail 1E
Water Problem-Broken
Sprinkler Head Emergency Call 53A6 130 1E or 1T
Water Problem-Domes4c
Water Leak with Electrical Hazard Emergency Call 53C1 131 1E or 1T Water Problem-Domes4c
Water Leak w/o Electrical
Hazard Special Duty 53A4 113 1E or 1T
Water Problem-Structure
Flooding, non- fire related Emergency Call 53O5 134 1E or 1T Category
Problem Nature Descrip&on Response Priority CAD Code Incident Type CFD

APPENDIX
601
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
101

APPENDIX

EFFECTIVE RESPONSE FORCE ANALYSIS

FIRE LOW
602
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
102

APPENDIX

EFFECTIVE RESPONSE FORCE ANALYSIS

FIRE MEDIUM
603
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
103

APPENDIX

EFFECTIVE RESPONSE FORCE ANALYSIS

FIRE HIGH
604
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
104

APPENDIX

EFFECTIVE RESPONSE FORCE ANALYSIS

EMS MODERATE
605
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
105

APPENDIX

EFFECTIVE RESPONSE FORCE ANALYSIS

EMS HIGH
606
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
106

APPENDIX

EFFECTIVE RESPONSE FORCE ANALYSIS

HAZMAT LOW
607
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
107

APPENDIX

EFFECTIVE RESPONSE FORCE ANALYSIS

HAZMAT HIGH
608
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
108

APPENDIX

EFFECTIVE RESPONSE FORCE ANALYSIS

TECHNICAL RESCUE LOW
609
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
109

APPENDIX

EFFECTIVE RESPONSE FORCE ANALYSIS

TECHNICAL RESCUE HIGH
610
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
110

APPENDIX
611
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
111

APPENDIX
612
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
112

APPENDIX
613
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
113
To access this report electronically as well as other guiding documents, please scan the code above or visit:
https://cityofclovis.com/fire/about-fd/soc-annual-report/ 614
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

ATTACHMENT 3
615
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

Message from the Fire Chief……………………………………………………………… 2
Introduction.........………...………………………………..……………………………….. 3 Jurisdiction and Organizational Background ............................................................. 4 Fire Department Organizational Chart ...................................................................... 5 Mission, Vision, and Values ...................................................................................... 6 Call Volume for Past 5 Years .................................................................................... 7 Notable Statistics ...................................................................................................... 8 Fire Facilities ............................................................................................................. 9 Strategic Planning Process………………………………..………………………….…. 10 The Community-Driven Strategic Planning Process Outline…..…….……….. 11 Summary of Findings from External Stakeholders….…………………………. 13 Strategic Initiatives…………….…………………………………….…………………… 15
Performance Management ...................................................................................... 23 The Success of the Strategic Plan.………………………………………..…………… 24 Analysis of the Current Department ........................................................................ 25

TABLE OF CONTENTS
616
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

MESSAGE FROM THE FIRE CHIEF
I am proud to present the Clovis Fire Department 2022-2026 Strategic Plan. The mission of the Clovis Fire Department is fairly simple at its core: protect our community. However carrying out this mission is very complex and becomes more complex with each passing year. The strategic planning process is our way of ensuring that we evaluate all aspects of our service delivery, compare them against the appropriate regulations, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards, and industry best practices, then develop a plan that ensures we do the best we can with the resources we are provided. We are fortunate that we serve a community which recognizes the importance of public safety in maintaining a healthy and vibrant community. We are also fortunate to have a workforce that recognizes the value of teamwork, planning, preparing, efficiency and ultimately, service to the community. These two forces have enabled the Clovis Fire Department to be a model of excellence within the fire service community.

Even in light of our historical successes, we are still well aware that we have future hazards and challenges to meet. It is our belief that, in the future, the fire service will see more scrutiny in the cost of the services we provide, more unfunded government regulation, more pressure to contain costs, and more demand for performance outcome metrics for decision makers (i.e., cost vs. benefit, return on investment, trends over time, etc.). These factors will require more effort towards following private sector business models including continuous improvement process, embrace change, and move towards more outcome based performance objectives. It will also push more agencies toward developing agreements with surrounding fire agencies to provide seamless fire service protection to the communities we serve.

As our city grows, there will be more demand for services (call volume), particularly for seniors and socioeconomically challenged citizens. Urban planning will move toward higher densities that will require road network and deployment strategies to evolve. Civil unrest and social strains will create more hazards and place more risk on our firefighters and fire administration.

After September 11, 2001 and now, again, after many years of the impacts of COVID-19, a new dynamic has been created resulting in potential financial impacts at the local level. This required the fire service to respond in new ways and to explore alternatives in emergency service delivery. Strategic planning is critical as Clovis Fire Department prepares for the future, responds to the needs of the community, and properly assesses its type, level, and ability to provide exceptional service.

On a more positive note, we see the Clovis Fire Department as being positioned very well to meet the coming challenges, probably better than the majority of other fire service agencies in the state. We will continue to leverage our resources and strengths to ensure the Clovis Fire Department is always available when our community calls.

John Binaski
Fire Chief 2
617
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

INTRODUCTION
Over the last 100 years, the Clovis Fire Department (CFD) has grown and evolved to continually meet the needs of the community. The organization provides fire suppression, emergency medical services, fire prevention, technical rescue, hazardous materials mitigation, domestic preparedness planning and response, fire investigation, and public fire safety education to the City of Clovis. The Clovis Fire Department is consistently working to achieve and maintain the highest level of professionalism and efficiency on behalf of the community.

The Clovis Fire Department prides itself on being progressive in terms of providing state-of-the-art fire protection services at an efficient cost. One of the strategies CPD has incorporated into its long -term plans is to follow the process of fire service accreditation through the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE). The accreditation process for the fire service is similar to the accreditation process for hospitals, schools and law enforcement agencies. The discipline being evaluated has developed a set of performance standards and best practices with CPSE using neutral, subject matter experts, to evaluate the candidate organization to ensure they are able to perform at the level expected. Fire agencies in every developed nations have embraced this process. The Clovis Fire Department is proud to be known as one of the first fire departments in California to attain accredited status, and has maintained the status for nearly fourteen years.

This Strategic Plan was written in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the Center for Public Safety Excellence - Fire & Emergency Service Self-Assessment Manual 10th Edition, and is intended to guide the organization within established parameters set forth by the City of Clovis.

The plan includes input from a representative group composed of members of the organization (internal stakeholders) and from the community at large (external stakeholders).

The Clovis Fire Department’s Strategic Plan sets forth a comprehensive vision and mission statement that provides the agency with a clear understanding of its purpose. Additionally, this strategic plan identifies the core values that allow the organization’s members, individually and collectively, to carry out the day-to-day functions in support of the mission. 3 618
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

ORGANIZATIONAL BACKGROUND
The City of Clovis, known as the “Gateway to the
Sierras”, is located in the Central Valley region of
California, along the eastern foothills of the Sierra
Nevada mountain range. It is the second largest
incorporated city in the County of Fresno and part of the Fresno/Clovis metro area. It is the home of the nationally recognized Clovis Rodeo which was established in 1914,
an award-winning school district, public safety services, and family-friendly amenities. The City of Clovis is a
General Law City, with a City Manager reporting to a
five-member City Council. Councilmembers are elected
at-large from the community and serve four-year terms.

One member of the Council serves a two-year term as
Mayor and is elected to the position by the Council.

The inception of the Clovis Fire Department began in
1892 with the formation of a “bucket brigade” comprised of employees from the local sawmill for the protection of their buildings, equipment, and lumber. These sawmill
employees would provide assistance to the community of
Clovis, along with the spontaneous civilian volunteers that would spring into action when fire erupted. In 1912, the community of Clovis was formally incorporated as a City. Almost immediately, the City passed a series of fire ordinances and authorized the purchase of some basic firefighting equipment available for emergencies. The formation of a formal City of Clovis volunteer fire department followed on October 16, 1917.

In 1966, the City hired its first full-time fire
chief and five firefighters, thus transforming
the organization into a paid/professional
career department. Today, the Clovis Fire
Department provides fire protection services
to the City of Clovis, protecting a population of
over 120,000, covering just over 27 square
miles, as well as to the surrounding agencies
as part of an automatic/mutual aid agreement.

The Department currently consists of 67
firefighters deployed from five strategically
located fire stations and six support staff. It
has a Class II rating from the Insurance
Service Organization and is accredited from
the Center of Public Safety Excellence.
4 619
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

FIRE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

CITY OF CLOVIS OFFICIALS
5 CITY OF CLOVIS VISION
“A City that is committed to the Clovis Community Family, their needs, their values, and a quality of life for all; reflecting that commitment in how it develops and in the activities it undertakes.”
620
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

OUR MISSION

OUR VISION

OUR VALUES

The Mission of the Clovis Fire Department is to provide for the fire and life safety of the community in the most professional, courteous and efficient manner possible.

Prevent Harm Be Professional Use Resources Wisely
· To our Community · In our Appearance · With our Budget · To our Firefighters · In our Performance · With our Time · To our Environment · In our Reputation · With our People The Clovis Fire Department is dedicated to serving the people of our community and we will work to continue to exceed community expectations. We will provide leadership locally, regionally and nationally. We will establish and strengthen partnerships and cooperate with allied agencies to enhance our service. We will provide the best service possible within the fiscal opportunities available. We will exercise foresight in planning, preparing and auditing for the safety and well-being of the community. We will promote confidence, trust and self-reliance through personal and professional growth. We will support our workforce to maintain a healthy lifestyle and perform duties in a safe and responsible manner.

We Value the Clovis Way of Life Through…
Teamwork Empowerment of our personnel to provide quality customer service Traditions Remembering the past
Innovation Always seeking to acquire knowledge and skill Integrity Adherence to moral and ethical principles
Honor Integrity in one’s beliefs and actions
Respect Deference to the rights or opinions of others
Creativity Transcending traditional ideas or patterns to create meaningful new ideas Courage Facing difficulty without fear
Service with Pride
6 OUR MOTTO
621
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

CALL VOLUME FOR PAST 5 YEARS
Call Volume by Call Type, 2017-2021
Incident Type 2018 2019 2020 2021 5-Year
Average
Emergency Medical 6,142 6,599 6,566 7,134 6,452
Good Intent/Service Call 2,469 2,253 2,097 2,082 2,231
Fire 336 351 386 386 376
Hazardous Materials/Explosion 177 193 178 130 165
Rescues & Vehicle Accidents 375 467 397 427 441
False Alarm & False Call 621 799 647 613 657
TOTAL 10,122 10,662 10,274 10,772 10,323
2017
5,821
2,253
421
147
538
604
9,784
7 COMPARISON OF CITY POPULATION & CFD SWORN STAFF BY YEAR 622
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

NOTABLE STATISTICS
COMPARISON OF PEER CITIES—2021/22
Peer City
Fire
Department
Budget
(In Millions)
Popula&on
Es&mate
Per Capita
Fire
Department
Expenditures
Sworn
Personnel
Firefighters
per 1,000
popula&on
ISO Ra&ng
(lower is
be-er)
CPSE
Accredita&on
Santa Maria $11.9 109,707 $109 72 0.66 4 NO
Chico $13.9 101,475 $137 57 0.56 2 NO
Bakersfield $52.2 403,455 $129 240 0.59 2 YES
Hanford $6.7 57,990 $116 33 0.57 2 NO
Lodi $16.4 66,348 $247 55 0.83 2 NO
Manteca $9.6 83,498 $116 51 0.61 3 NO
Merced $11.0 86,333 $127 63 0.73 2 NO
Modesto $39.2 218,464 $180 139 0.64 2 NO
Porterville $7.3 62,623 $117 42 0.67 2 NO
Tulare $9.3 68,875 $135 44 0.64 2 NO
Visalia $18.6 141,384 $132 77 0.54 3 NO
Compara&ve $22.7 129,950 $170 78 0.60 3 NO
Clovis $20.3 120,124 $167 67 0.56 2 YES
Fresno $76.8 542,107 $142 302 0.56 3 NO
Tracy $25.6 93,000 $275 82 0.70 4 NO
8 623
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

FIRE FACILITIES
9 Station 1
633 Pollasky
1 Engine, 1 Truck, 1 Rescue Apparatus
Station 2
2300 Minnewawa
2 Engines
Station 3
555 N. Villa
1 Engine, 1 Brush Engine
Station 4
2427 Armstrong
2 Engines, 1 Water Tender
Station 5
790 N. Temperance
1 Engine, 1 Truck, 1 HazMat Apparatus
Station 6
2388 Encino
624
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS
What is a Strategic Plan?
It is a living management tool that:
• Provides short-term direction
• Builds a shared vision
• Sets goals and objectives
• Optimizes use of resources
The fire service has entered into a very competitive evolutionary cycle. Public demands continue to increase, while dollars and other resources continue to shrink. These trends place increased pressure on the modern fire service chief, manager, Councilmembers, and staff to develop ways to be more effective and more efficient.

To ensure that community needs were integral to the development of the Clovis Fire Department Strategic Plan, the Community-Driven Strategic planning process was utilized. Effective strategic planning benefits from a consistent and cohesively structured process employed across all levels of the organization. Planning is a continuous process, one with no clear beginning or end. The planning process should be flexible and dynamic, with new information from community stakeholders, City Council, and community changes factored in appropriately.

Community-Driven Strategic Planning creates a platform for a wide range of beginnings. The approach comes to life by being shared, debated, and implemented in the context of the organizational realities.

A "Community-Driven Organization is defined as one that maintains a focus on the needs and expectations, both spoken and unspoken, of customers, both present and future, in the creation and/or improvement of the product or service
provided.”
10 625
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS
Goodstein, Nolan, & Pfeiffer define Strategic Planning as “a continuous and systematic process where the guiding members of an organization make decisions about its future, develop the necessary procedures and operations to achieve that future, and determine how success is to be measured.”
• Continuous refers to the view that strategic planning must be an ongoing process, not merely an event to produce a plan;
• Systematic recognizes that strategic planning must be a structured and deliberate effort, not something that happens on its own;
• Process recognizes that one of the benefits of strategic planning is to undertake thinking strategically about the future and how to get there, which is much more than production of a document (e.g., a strategic plan);
• Guiding members identifies not only senior unit executives, but also employees. (It also considers stakeholders and customers, who may not make these decisions, but who affect the decisions being made);
• Procedures and Operations means the full spectrum of actions and activities from aligning the organization behind clear long-term goals to putting in place organizational and personal incentives, allocating resources, and developing the workforce to achieve the desired outcomes; and
• How success is to be measured recognizes that strategic planning must use appropriate measures to determine if the organization has achieved success.

Planning is a continuous process, one with no clear beginning and no clear end. While plans can be developed on a regular basis, it is the process of planning that is important, not the publication of the plan itself. Most importantly, strategic planning can be an opportunity to unify the City, leadership, members, and stakeholders through a common understanding of where the department is going, how everyone involved can work toward that common purpose, and how progress will measure success.
11 626
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS OUTLINE

1. Define the services provided to the community and establish the community's service priorities.

2. Establish the community’s expectations of the department, aspects that the community views positively, as well as any concerns they may have about the department.

3. (Re) Develop the departments mission statement.

4. (Re) Establish the values of the department's membership.

5. Identify the strengths and any weaknesses of the department.

6. Identify areas of opportunity for and potential challenges to the department.

7. Establish realistic goals and objectives, along with critical tasks for each objective.

8. Develop a vision of the future.

The Clovis Fire Department utilized a community–driven strategic planning process to critically examine traditions, values, philosophies, beliefs, and desires. Members of the committee were challenged to work in the best interest of the organization with a focus on service to the community.

The external and internal stakeholder groups performed an outstanding job in committing to this important project and remain committed to this document’s completion.

A strategic plan serves as a management tool that documents the shared mission and vision into a series of short-term and long-term strategic initiatives, goals and objectives. The intent is to drive the organization toward a common vision while optimizing organizational resources. The Clovis Fire Department recognizes the future of the fire service will continue to change due to multiple influencing forces, the greatest of which will be citizen expectations. Although we fully expect to see influences from all facets of the world around us, it is service to our citizens that will drive the majority of changes. In short, we don’t want to waste time and energy on goals that lack a good cost/benefit ratio. The process of strategic planning is as important as the final plan itself. The inclusion of internal stakeholders from all ranks and a diverse cross section of external stakeholders were used to ensure the plan had strategic initiatives that reflected the community but were balanced against various constraints.

Stakeholders were selected by soliciting interested people from within the organization and from the community at large. The process took participants through a wide variety of lectures and discussions on fire department organization, levels of service and Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges (SWOC analysis). External and internal stakeholders were asked a series of questions related to their expectations as customers and service providers. There was a pre and post survey of their perception of the Clovis Fire Department and the services we provide. The committee also developed their expectations of the department and validated a majority of the work previous stakeholder groups have provided over the past 15 years. Several of the original external stakeholders continue to be involved in our annual review and appraisals of the department. 12 627
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS
13 628
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS

1. Maintain the current service delivery levels for fire and emergency medical response throughout the City.

2. Established benchmarks and outcomes are appropriate and should be continually evaluated to meet industry best practice.

3. Future development, or new growth areas, should not adversely impact the current level of service in existing areas of the community.

4. Non-emergency community contact is essential in community risk reduction. Firefighters should continue attending public events, conducting school programs, providing public education activities, and interacting with community groups.

5. The Fire Department plays an important part in maintaining a safe business environment and lowering insurance premiums. The Fire Department is key in protecting both City and business revenues from potential loss.

6. The Fire Department needs to maintain and replace, when needed, its fire apparatus, fire stations, and training facilities. Having high-quality equipment, fire apparatus, and stations extends the useful life of these important resources.

7. The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) has been a successful program utilized to train community members in disaster response. Additional volunteer opportunities could be beneficial to the Department and those citizens willing to volunteer.

8. Maintain or enhance existing public-private partnerships, such as the ones with American Ambulance, CUSD, PG&E, and Fresno City College. Continue to work with CUSD Career Technical Education in support of the Fire Technology Program and the Department’s Fire Explorer Program to expand opportunities for future firefighters to attract a diverse workforce mirroring he community we serve.

9. Clovis Firefighters are viewed as being well trained, professional, and courteous. It is expected from the community that this will continue in the future.

10. Current pay and benefits are appropriate, this should be maintained to attract a diverse and professional workforce.
14 629
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

STRATEGIC INITIATIVE #1

STRATEGIC INITIATIVES
The Clovis Fire Department bridges the gap between the organizational mission and the critical day-to-day tasks it takes to support an organized list of goals in the form of a strategic planning document. Strategic initiatives are broad statements that set a direction for the organization. Many require support and/or cooperation from entities or departments outside of the Fire Department.

Under each initiative, there may be included more specific goals and objectives that support the overarching initiative. After diligent review by all stakeholders, the following five Strategic Initiatives were developed along with a list of goals with supporting critical tasks.

Provide cost effective, efficient services that reflect best practices in the industry.

To be sustainable in the future, the fire service must evaluate trends, evaluate cost efficiency, provide effective service delivery models that reflect best practices, and monitor financial accounts to ensure that service is affordable to local taxpayers.

Goal 1A Maintain annual budget expenditures at or below $170 per person and enhance annual budget revenues where applicable.

Outcomes &
Objectives
To make sure the citizens served by the Clovis Fire Department are receiving a competitive service for the cost per citizen. In 2000, a study was conducted which showed to have an effective fire department it would require a minimum cost of $100 per citizen per year. As you increase this for the last twenty two years to account for inflation (3%), the result is $170.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Monitor the overall budget minus revenue received from the Office of Emergency Services for out of area responses.
• Review Master Fee Schedule annually and monitor revenue streams. • Monitor continued expenses for special teams such as hazardous materials, urban search and rescue, and fire investigations.
• Complete annual appraisal reviews for all workgroups to determine if the outcomes are in line with costs.
• Maintain employee injury cost rate below $200,000 annually. • Monitor the cost benefit of overtime compared to hiring. • Explore additional public private partnerships.
• Monitor and review costs for discipline and litigation.

Appraisal
Timeframe Annually. Appraisal
Documents
Fire Department Budget, CIP Budget,
Fleet, and Out of County
15 630
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

Goal 1B Continuously improve on ways of protecting lives, property, and the environment prior and during emergency incidents.

Outcomes &
Objectives
• Maintain an annual property fire loss below the 5-year average ($2.4 million). • Keep annual growth rate of structure fire instances at or below annual population growth (percent of structure fires lower than percentage of population growth year over year).
• Contain structure fires to room of origin for 80% of incidents. • Zero civilian fire deaths (structure fires/accidental/unintentional).

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Monitor to ensure 911 fire/rescue calls for service are processed (alarm handling) within 1 minute and 30 seconds, 90% of the time (emergent calls, 911 pick up to unit alert). • Turnout time for fire/rescue calls for service within 1 minute and 30 seconds, 90% of the time (emergent calls, unit alert to wheels rolling).
• First unit travel time to structure fires, hazardous material releases, and other crisis incidents requiring use of personal protective equipment within 4 minutes, 90% of the time (emergent calls code 3, wheels rolling to unit arrival at scene). • Inspect 100% of all CA State regulated occupancies that require an inspection and submit compliance report annually (In accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 19).
• Inspect 95% of high-risk occupancies annually.
• Inspect 90% of all moderate and low risk occupancies during each two-year inspection cycle.
• Keep annual Unit Hour Utilization (UHU) percentage below 30% for all units.

Appraisal
Timeframe Continuous and annually. Appraisal
Documents Annual Report
Goal 1C Improve Firefighter Safety and Survival.

Outcomes &
Objectives
• Contain structure fires to room of origin for 80% of incidents. • Zero firefighter line of duty deaths.
• Maintain an employee injury rate below 20 percent of total allocated staffing positions (industrial injuries).
• Maintain Workers Compensation annual costs below $200,000 (3% or less of total fire suppression personnel salaries).

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Provide extensive annual health and wellness physicals to all sworn department personnel
• Provide immediate medical treatment and care, when required. • Provide injured employees with access to Workers Compensation paperwork and medical care, when required.
• Provide required structure fire training and acting recertification training. • Provide proven cancer preventing measures to protect personnel while on emergency incidents and in the fire stations.
• Expand the use of the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT).

Appraisal
Timeframe Continuous and annually. Appraisal
Documents Annual Report
16 631
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

Goal 1D Maintain accreditation status through the Center for Public Safety Excellence.

Outcomes &
Objectives
Accreditation provides outside peer review of the Fire Department and confirms the department is meeting industry best practices.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Update Strategic Plan and review annually.
• Update Standard of Cover and review annually.
• Complete required documentation for accreditation.
• Complete the CFAI annual compliance reports.

Goal 1E Maintain a Class II or higher Insurance Service Organization (ISO) rating.

Outcomes &
Objectives
The business community in the City of Clovis benefit from having lower insurance rates and having a lower ISO rating assists in accomplishing this.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Review the ISO Fire Suppression Rating Schedule.
• Evaluate areas for improving the department’s ISO rating based on cost benefit analysis.

Goal 1F Maintain a 5-year capital improvement plan for the department and ensure appropriate funding for expected needs.

Outcomes &
Objectives
In order to provide for an efficient effective response force, the Fire Department needs to be strategically located throughout the community and respond with the appropriate resources.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Review the department’s 20 year Fleet Replacement Plan and monitor for proper funding.
• Review the department’s small engine (Hurst Tool, chainsaws, K12, and others) and hose replacement plan and monitor for proper funding.
• Review the department’s 20 year fire station maintenance and improvement plan.

Appraisal
Timeframe Annually. Appraisal
Documents
Fire Department Budget, 5-Year Capital
Budget, Fleet Replacement
17 632
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

Goal 2A Improve patient survivability for sudden cardiac arrest measured by Return Of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) 24 hours after the event to a level above 35%.

Outcomes &
Objectives
• Maintain a cardiac survival rate at or above the national average (ROSC, 3-year average)
• Advocate to ensure an ALS transport capable ambulance arrival at EMS calls within 9 minutes, 90% of the time (emergent calls, 911 verification of address to first-unit arrival)
Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Monitor private ambulance provider total response time compliance of ALS arrival with 9 minutes, 90% of the time.
• Review all cardiac arrest patients care reports.
• See if there are any common themes from patients who do not survive (Obesity, lifestyle, drugs, and etc.).
• Review trends or new technology to improve cardiac survival. • Replace all existing automatic external defibulators (AED). • Look at expanding locations of citizen AED throughout the city. • Develop a CPR fraction rate performance measure for cardiac arrest incidents. • Increase bystander CPR participation rate to 50 percent (911 to provide data).

Appraisal
Timeframe Annually. Appraisal
Documents PCR, CAD Data, ROSC Report
Goal 2B Maintain or improve response time performance, specifically in the Northwest Heritage Grove Area (North of Shepard and East of Fowler) of the city.

Outcomes &
Objectives
To provide the same level of emergency services throughout all areas within the City of Clovis. Currently the Fire Department is experiencing longer than the adopted response time standards in the southeast.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Monitor response time performance.
• Purchase property to locate future Station #7 in the northwest.

Appraisal
Timeframe Annually. Appraisal
Documents
Annual Report, Planning Calendar,
Annexations
Maintain or improve service delivery to the citizens of Clovis.

As the organization prepares itself to meet the demands of the future, identifying the data sources that will be required to provide accurate, reliable forecasting and quality business analytics, is essential. Use of data to make quality business decisions is a critical element to the progress of the department as we focus on quality improvement and improving the performance of our organization. It is essential that we utilize quality data and establish methods to measure the performance of the services we provide.

STRATEGIC INITIATIVE #2
18 633
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

Goal 3A Promote community engagement and enhance outreach to better connect with our customers.

Outcomes &
Objectives
To engage the citizens of Clovis to better understand the functions and responsibilities of the Fire Department beyond what they have seen on TV.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Work with, and expand opportunities with the City’s PIO Team. • Review all of the ways we communicate with the public. • Expand the department’s public education and participation with Clovis Unified School District.
• Look at our social media footprint and provide systematic updates to the departments webpage, Facebook and Twitter.

Goal 3B Fire companies take ownership and accountability of results within their first-due response districts.

Outcomes &
Objectives
To have each fire station and specifically each shift become more involved with businesses, schools, and the public within their first due response area.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Have each engine company shift complete 100 business inspections annually within their first due area if applicable.
• Have each engine company shift attend all school carnivals within their first due area. • Have each engine company shift attend each preschool annually within their first due area.
• Each engine company and specifically each shift will be responsible to meet required response time standards as outlined by policy and to complete a physical walk through of all high-hazard occupancies within their first-due area. • Explore the possibility of sending a direct mailer to citizens within the response area for a particular station to determinespecific citizen needs and expectations.

Increase value-added services to provide the best possible service to the community beyond the 9-1-1 call.

It is essential that we define what differentiates Clovis Fire Department from other service providers, and align our services with what the public wants the fire and rescue service to do.

STRATEGIC INITIATIVE #3
19 634
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

Goal 3D Promote innovation within the organization.

Outcomes &
Objectives
The Fire Service is constantly changing and improving. Over the past forty years, the Fire Service has expanded the areas they are responsible for beyond just responding to fires.

This includes medical aids, hazardous materials, urban search and rescue, and many others.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Encourage all personnel to bring forth recommendations for improvement. • Send personnel to training or conferences on new techniques or changing standards. • Embrace an agency that is progressive and willing to change based on data and facts not emotions.

Goal 3C Promote a positive agency reputation within the community.

Outcomes &
Objectives
• Recruit and hire employees that represent the demographic make-up of the community. • Zero cases of harassment/discrimination.
• Zero cases requiring formal disciplinary action (action above written reprimand).

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Update and maintain a two-year training plan (concurrent with periodic risk assessment).
• Provide liability reduction/harassment prevention/people-skills training to all employees annually (in compliance with AB1825/SB1343).
• Review/update all disciplinary policies and procedures.

Appraisal
Timeframe Annually. Appraisal
Documents Training Plan
20 635
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

Goal 4A Enhance the department’s succession planning and professional development efforts.

Outcomes &
Objectives
Over the next five years, it is projected the department will see a larger than normal number of retirements and the department needs to be prepared for the need to promote individuals into higher positions throughout the organization.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Increase acting, interim assignments, and professional development opportunities. • Increase training and educational opportunities for all personnel as outlined by their respective MOUs.
• Bring outside instructors or courses locally so personnel can attend without travel expenses.
• Expand the opportunities for personnel to attend conferences. • Expand the opportunities for personnel to be on local, state, and national committees.

Goal 4B Expand the culture of the organization to better recognize, value, and implement safety strategies.

Outcomes &
Objectives
Firefighting has inherited risks, but he goal of the professional firefighter is to measure the risk verses the gain to determine potential positive outcomes.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Update Operational Risk Management Policy.
• Provide employee behavior health update.
• Provided current and updated Safety Officer training. • Provide equipment and training for active threat incidents. • Provide updated training on NIST updates and Transitional Fire Attack.

Goal 4C Expand temporary 40-hour work assignment opportunities for 56-hour employees Interested in career advancement.

Outcomes &
Objectives
To give shift employees an opportunity to expand their knowledge base and experience working in one of the 40-hour assignment positions.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Based on overtime costs and staffing solicit for interested personnel to be part of training during the winter months to complete special training projects. • Based on overtime costs and staffing solicit for interested personnel to be part of expanding our public education within the city as needed.

Invest in leadership development and employee wellbeing for the long-term success of the department.

To remain competitive in the future and reflect best practices, quality, well-trained and motivated personnel is imperative. Investing in leadership development is an essential component for the long-term health of the organization. This will ensure and reinforce effective leadership and management concepts and support the exploration of new ideas and practices.

STRATEGIC INITIATIVE #4
21 636
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

Goal 5A Perform fire prevention inspections on all 2,000+ public occupancies on a bi-annual basis.

Outcomes &
Objectives
In order to have a fire safe city for the citizens who reside or visit, it is necessary for existing business to be inspected for meeting the current California Fire Code and local municipal codes.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Inspect 100% of all CA State regulated occupancies that require an inspection and submit compliance report annually (In accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 19).
• Inspect 95% of all commercial fire protection systems annually. • Inspect 95% of high-risk occupancies annually.
• Inspect 90% of all moderate and low risk occupancies during each two-year inspection cycle.
• Engine companies will inspect approximately 750 business occupancies annually.

Appraisal
Timeframe Annually. Appraisal
Documents
Prevention Inspection and Plan Check
Reports, and Annual Report
Goal 5B Provide grade school fire prevention public education in conjunction with the burn foundation to all Clovis Unified Schools within the City of Clovis.

Outcomes &
Objectives
To work on improving fire safety education to all grade school children attending Clovis Unified Schools throughout the City of Clovis.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• Complete pre and post tests for all school children attending the FISE education presentations.
• Expand the use of engine companies for school public education opportunities. • Review the results of the data from each education session.

STRATEGIC INITIATIVE #5
Invest in Fire Prevention, Public Education, and Fire Investigation efforts with the goal of reducing fires before they occur. 22 637
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

Goal 5C Investigate all fires for cause and origin and work with proper authorities for all prosecution of all fires deemed to be caused by arson.

Outcomes &
Objectives
In order to keep fire insurance costs as low as possible for local businesses and the community, all fires need to be investigated to determine cause and origin. The goal is to look for trends and prosecute arson cases as needed.

Critical Tasks &
Measurements
• All fires within the City of Clovis will be investigated for cause and origin. • All fires deemed suspicious will be followed up with Clovis Fire Investigations Team in cooperation with Clovis PD.
• A sufficient fire investigation report will be completed on all fires Appraisal
Timeframe Annually. Appraisal
Documents
Annual Report and Annual
Appraisal from CFIT
22 *All Strategic Initiatives are formally tracked in the Department’s Strategic Initiative Tracking Form. 638
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
To assess and ensure that our organization is delivering on the promises made in this strategic plan, the leaders must determine performance measures for which they are fully accountable. As output measurement can be challenging, our organization must focus on the assessment of progress toward achieving improved output. The Clovis Fire Department must further be prepared to revisit and revise our goals, objectives, and performance measures to keep up with accomplishments and environmental changes.

To establish that the department’s strategic plan is achieving results, performance measurement data will be implemented and integrated as part of the plan. An integrated process, known as “Managing for Results”, will be utilized, which is based upon the following tenants. • The identification of strategic goals and objectives; • The determination of resources necessary to achieve them; • The analyzing and evaluation of performance data; and • The use of that data to drive continuous improvement in the organization.

A “family of measures” typically utilized to indicated and measure performance includes:
• Inputs—Value of resource used to produce an output.
• Outputs—Quantifiable units produced which are activity-oriented and measurable. • Efficiency—Inputs used per output (or outputs per input). • Service Quality—The degree to which customers are satisfied with a program, or how accurately or timely a service is provided.
• Outcome—Qualitative results associated with a program/service; i.e., the ultimate benefit to the customer. Focused on the “why” of providing a service. “No matter how much you have achieved, you will always be merely good relative to what you can become. Greatness is an inherently dynamic process, not an end point.”

Jim Collins
Good to Great and the Social Sectors
23 639
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

THE SUCCESS OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN
The Clovis Fire Department has approached its desire to develop and implement a Strategic Plan by asking for and receiving input from the community and members of the department during the development stage of the planning process. The department utilized professional standards and the Community-Driven Strategic Planning Process to compile this document.

The success of the Clovis Fire Department’s Strategic Plan will not only depend upon implementation of the strategic initiatives and their related goals, but also from the support received from the City of Clovis, membership of the department, and the community at-large.

The final step in the Community-Driven Strategic Planning Process is to develop organizational and community commitment to the plan. Everyone who has a stake in the present and the future of the Clovis Fire Department also has a role and responsibility in this Strategic Plan.

Provided that the Community-Driven Strategic Planning process is kept dynamic and supported by effective leadership and active participation, it will be a considerable opportunity to unify internal and external stakeholders through a jointly developed understanding of organizational direction; how all vested parties will work to achieve the mission, goals, and vision; and how the organization will measure and be accountable for its progress and successes. 24 640
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

ANALYSIS OF CURRENT DEPARTMENT
The Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Challenges (SWOC) analysis is designed to help the organization evaluate itself in order to determine its current state of effectiveness as well as its future competitiveness/survival based foreseeable changes. Stakeholders were asked to develop a broad list of items from each category, which was then summarized as follows:

Strengths
♦ Employees are passionate about the organization and providing better than average service to the community.
♦ Department enjoys broad support from the community.
♦ Well established labor management relationship.
♦ Department can provide a self-sufficient effective response force for all risk categories. ♦ The ability to provide mutual aid/auto aid to both Operational Area and statewide. ♦ Facilities are well designed and maintained .
♦ Department is perceived as a good regional partner by other fire agencies. ♦ Department can attract and retain employees due to good working conditions, pay and benefits Administrative and Operational staffing levels meet minimum standards. ♦ Department has experienced a very low frequency of high-risk events. ♦ Building stock throughout the community is newer and remains in good shape. ♦ Department provides a diverse list of services beyond fire suppression, such as Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Management, Hazardous Materials Team, Urban Search and Rescue Team, Fire Investigations Team and others.
♦ High level of technical expertise and a highly educated staff within the department Cancer Prevention activities along with annual wellness/physicals for all suppression personnel.

Weaknesses
♦ Poor call handling times by dispatch/lack of data sharing between primary PSAP and secondary PSAP.
♦ Need to improve the frequency and depth of communication to organization. ♦ Need Pre-Plans updated and immediately accessible to the responding crews. ♦ Need better data entry and report writing by officers, prevention, and other staff to maintain quality data analytics.
♦ Refine, update and re-format the policy manual.
♦ Need to grow IT support to meet the needs of the organization moving forward. ♦ Logistical support and fleet maintenance.
♦ Need a process to measure internal customer service.
25 641
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

ANALYSIS OF CURRENT DEPARTMENT
Opportunities
♦ Explore opportunities for expansion in EMS and ambulance RFP. ♦ Explorer bringing in outside instructors for the betterment of the organization. (Peer support/ behavior health, fire investigations, and incident operations). ♦ Leverage technology to improve processes.
♦ Continue engagement with local leaders.
♦ Company level engagement with the community.
♦ Enforcement of codes – cost recovery options.
♦ Explore additional grants or other funding opportunities. ♦ Better market Department’s services via social media and community relations. ♦ Explore opportunities to improve recruitment & retention management and 40-hour staff assignments.
♦ Improve cardiac survival program.

Challenges
♦ Maintain service levels over time as the city continues to increase in population, density and building farther away from existing fire stations
♦ Pension and OPEB unfunded liabilities
♦ Future economic downturn
♦ Changing workforce – culture, capabilities, expectations ♦ Improving diversity of the workforce
♦ Recruiting fire prevention staff
♦ Rapidly changing expectations of the community
♦ Social media impacts
♦ Reputation management
♦ Keeping connection with the community
♦ Ability to staff during highest demands (summer, wildfire season, mutual aid, etc.) ♦ Unfunded political/regulatory mandates (state and federal) ♦ Litigation
♦ Maintaining response time benchmarks, accreditation, and ISO ratings ♦ Growing threat of cyber attacks
26 642
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
643
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.

CLOVIS FIRE DEPARTMENT
Service with Pride2021

ANNUAL REPORT

COMMAND STAFF
John Binaski, Fire Chief
Chris Ekk, Deputy Chief
Jim Damico, Battalion Chief
Jason Ralls, Battalion Chief
Anthony Gomes, Battalion Chief
Chad Fitzgerald, Life Safety
Enforcement Manager
Katie Krahn
Management Analyst
ATTACHMENT 4
644
AGENDA ITEM NO. 21.
1 | 2021 ANNUAL REPORT
2021 marks five years that I have had the honor and privilege to serve the residents of Clovis as their Fire Chief.

I work alongside 73 well-trained and highly skilled professional firefighters, fire engineers, fire officers, chief officers, fire inspectors, and administrative staff. Together, we provide incredible emergency services to approximately 120,124 residents with 26 square miles in our first due response area.

While the role of the fire service has dramatically changed and increased in complexity over the years, the commitment to serve our community to the best of our ability remains steadfast. Our department recognizes the importance of adaptability and the continual demand to change with the needs of our community.

The Clovis Fire Department saw a lot of exciting changes in 2021. In April, the largest hiring since 1999 occurred with an academy of ten. In July, promotions took place which made it possible to place a sixth fire company in service. In September, the Department placed two new fire engines in-service to replace fire engines which were over 15 years old and in October, we hired an additional three personnel to fill vacancies. The City was fortunate to have received grant funding to reimburse the expenses for nine of the new hires through Fiscal Year 2023/24. When Fire Station 6 opens in April 2022, it will be the first new fire station since the completion of Station 5 in 2006.

The Department saw the retirement of Fire Engineer Brad Couchman. We wish him and his family a happy, well-earned retirement.

Clovis City CouncilAugust 1, 2022

Clovis City Council
August 1, 2022