Agenda packet — Clovis City Council, April 15, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 194
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblConstDustMitigation
WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed
0 15
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 2.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 8.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 2 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 195
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblLandUse
LotAcreage

1.63 1.30
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

8.14 6.74
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

6.28 6.74
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

7.32 6.74
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

0.78 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic

1.30 1.63
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic

1.30 1.63
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 3 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 196
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2023

0.4306

1.4213

1.5445

2.8800e-
003

0.0466

0.0621

0.1087

0.0168

0.0596

0.0764

0.0000
242.3175
242.3175

0.0404

1.9800e-
003
243.9179
Maximum

0.4306

1.4213

1.5445

2.8800e-
003

0.0466

0.0621

0.1087

0.0168

0.0596

0.0764

0.0000
242.3175
242.3175

0.0404

1.9800e-
003
243.9179
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2023

0.3534

2.0946

1.6662

2.8800e-
003

0.0349

0.0845

0.1194

0.0113

0.0845

0.0958

0.0000
242.3173
242.3173

0.0404

1.9800e-
003
243.9177
Maximum

0.3534

2.0946

1.6662

2.8800e-
003

0.0349

0.0845

0.1194

0.0113

0.0845

0.0958

0.0000
242.3173
242.3173

0.0404

1.9800e-
003
243.9177
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

17.92 -47.38
-7.88

0.00 25.11
-36.05
-9.81

32.68 -41.69
-25.33

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 4 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 197
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 1-2-2023
4-1-2023

0.4634

0.6261
2 4-2-2023
7-1-2023

0.4415

0.6019
3 7-2-2023
9-30-2023

0.4415

0.6019
Highest

0.4634

0.6261

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.1671

0.0169

0.4990

1.0600e-
003

0.0511

6.5896

11.5792

18.1689

0.0313

2.1000e-
004

19.0135
Energy

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

29.2092

2.0300e-
003

5.5000e-
004

29.4233
Mobile

0.0861

0.1457

0.8158

1.9500e-
003

0.1925

1.6000e-
003

0.1941

0.0515

1.5000e-
003

0.0530

0.0000
182.9558
182.9558

9.5000e-
003

9.9200e-
003
186.1497
Waste

0.0000

2.4298

0.0000

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Water

0.0000

0.5374

1.2325

1.7700

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5505
Total

0.2551

0.1789

1.3217

3.1100e-
003

0.1925

0.0540

0.2465

0.0515

0.0539

0.1054

9.5569
224.9767
234.5336

0.2419

0.0120
244.1567
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 5 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 198
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.1338

0.0120

0.1974

7.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

11.5792

5.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.6537
Energy

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

29.2092

2.0300e-
003

5.5000e-
004

29.4233
Mobile

0.0861

0.1457

0.8158

1.9500e-
003

0.1925

1.6000e-
003

0.1941

0.0515

1.5000e-
003

0.0530

0.0000
182.9558
182.9558

9.5000e-
003

9.9200e-
003
186.1497
Waste

0.0000

2.4298

0.0000

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Water

0.0000

0.5374

1.2091

1.7465

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5268
Total

0.2219

0.1740

1.0201

2.1200e-
003

0.1925

4.7800e-
003

0.1973

0.0515

4.6800e-
003

0.0562

2.9672
224.9533
227.9205

0.2110

0.0120
236.7733
Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
1/2/2023
1/27/2023
5 20
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
1/28/2023
1/31/2023
5 2
3 Grading
Grading
2/1/2023
2/6/2023
5 4
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

13.02 2.75

22.82 31.83

0.00 91.15

19.97 0.00

91.32 46.69

68.95 0.01

2.82 12.74

0.00 3.02
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 6 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 199
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
2/7/2023
11/13/2023
5 200
5 Paving
Paving
11/14/2023
11/27/2023
5 10
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
11/28/2023
12/11/2023
5 10
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 8.00
97 0.37
Site Preparation
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 7.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 6.00
231

0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
1 6.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 6.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
3 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers
1 6.00
9 0.56
Paving
Pavers
1 6.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
1 8.00
132

0.36 Residential Indoor: 52,650; Residential Outdoor: 17,550; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 624 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1.88
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 0.23
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 7 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 200
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Paving
Rollers
1 7.00
80 0.38
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
5 13.00

0.00 8.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
3 8.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
4 10.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
7 25.00

5.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
5 13.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 5.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 8 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 201
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

8.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.6000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000

1.3000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0147

0.1432

0.1346

2.4000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

6.3300e-
003

0.0000

21.0866

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Total

0.0147

0.1432

0.1346

2.4000e-
004

8.6000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

7.6300e-
003

1.3000e-
004

6.3300e-
003

6.4600e-
003

0.0000

21.0866

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

7.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2266

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.2373
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

3.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

0.8276

2.0000e-
005

0.8353
Total

4.1000e-
004

7.6000e-
004

3.1800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

1.0542

2.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

1.0725
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 9 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 202
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

3.9000e-
004

0.0000

3.9000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

8.8600e-
003

0.2121

0.1542

2.4000e-
004

7.1800e-
003

0.0000

21.0865

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Total

8.8600e-
003

0.2121

0.1542

2.4000e-
004

3.9000e-
004

7.1800e-
003

7.5700e-
003

6.0000e-
005

7.1800e-
003

7.2400e-
003

0.0000

21.0865

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

7.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2266

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.2373
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

3.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

0.8276

2.0000e-
005

0.8353
Total

4.1000e-
004

7.6000e-
004

3.1800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

1.0542

2.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

1.0725
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 10 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 203
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

6.2700e-
003

0.0000

6.2700e-
003

3.0000e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.1300e-
003

0.0124

6.6400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

5.1000e-
004

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5236
Total

1.1300e-
003

0.0124

6.6400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.2700e-
003

5.1000e-
004

6.7800e-
003

3.0000e-
003

4.7000e-
004

3.4700e-
003

0.0000

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5236
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0000

0.0514
Total

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0000

0.0514
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 11 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 204
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

2.8200e-
003

0.0000

2.8200e-
003

1.3500e-
003

0.0000

1.3500e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

4.9000e-
004

0.0150

9.8200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5236
Total

4.9000e-
004

0.0150

9.8200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8200e-
003

3.7000e-
004

3.1900e-
003

1.3500e-
003

3.7000e-
004

1.7200e-
003

0.0000

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5236
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0000

0.0514
Total

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0000

0.0514
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 12 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 205
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0142

0.0000

0.0142

6.8500e-
003

0.0000

6.8500e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6700e-
003

0.0289

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6501
Total

2.6700e-
003

0.0289

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

0.0142

1.2100e-
003

0.0154

6.8500e-
003

1.1100e-
003

7.9600e-
003

0.0000

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6501
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.0000

0.1285
Total

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.0000

0.1285
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 13 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 206
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

6.3700e-
003

0.0000

6.3700e-
003

3.0800e-
003

0.0000

3.0800e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.2500e-
003

0.0362

0.0243

4.0000e-
005

9.7000e-
004

0.0000

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6501
Total

1.2500e-
003

0.0362

0.0243

4.0000e-
005

6.3700e-
003

9.7000e-
004

7.3400e-
003

3.0800e-
003

9.7000e-
004

4.0500e-
003

0.0000

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6501
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.0000

0.1285
Total

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.0000

0.1285
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 14 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 207
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1523

1.1710

1.2611

2.2100e-
003

0.0515

0.0497

0.0000
181.5991
181.5991

0.0308

0.0000
182.3701
Total

0.1523

1.1710

1.2611

2.2100e-
003

0.0515

0.0497

0.0000
181.5991
181.5991

0.0308

0.0000
182.3701
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

5.4000e-
004

0.0220

6.5800e-
003

1.0000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

1.4000e-
004

3.4600e-
003

9.6000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.0900e-
003

0.0000

9.6163

5.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

10.0489
Worker

7.7400e-
003

5.0100e-
003

0.0591

1.7000e-
004

0.0200

1.0000e-
004

0.0201

5.3100e-
003

9.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
003

0.0000

15.9151

4.8000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

16.0629
Total

8.2800e-
003

0.0270

0.0657

2.7000e-
004

0.0233

2.4000e-
004

0.0235

6.2700e-
003

2.2000e-
004

6.4900e-
003

0.0000

25.5314

5.3000e-
004

1.9100e-
003

26.1119
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 15 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 208
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

0.0840

1.7329

1.3479

2.2100e-
003

0.0732

0.0000
181.5989
181.5989

0.0308

0.0000
182.3698
Total

0.0840

1.7329

1.3479

2.2100e-
003

0.0732

0.0000
181.5989
181.5989

0.0308

0.0000
182.3698
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

5.4000e-
004

0.0220

6.5800e-
003

1.0000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

1.4000e-
004

3.4600e-
003

9.6000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.0900e-
003

0.0000

9.6163

5.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

10.0489
Worker

7.7400e-
003

5.0100e-
003

0.0591

1.7000e-
004

0.0200

1.0000e-
004

0.0201

5.3100e-
003

9.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
003

0.0000

15.9151

4.8000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

16.0629
Total

8.2800e-
003

0.0270

0.0657

2.7000e-
004

0.0233

2.4000e-
004

0.0235

6.2700e-
003

2.2000e-
004

6.4900e-
003

0.0000

25.5314

5.3000e-
004

1.9100e-
003

26.1119
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 16 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 209
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

3.2200e-
003

0.0312

0.0440

7.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

5.8862

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9329
Paving

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000
Total

3.5200e-
003

0.0312

0.0440

7.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

5.8862

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9329
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4138

1.0000e-
005

0.4176
Total

2.0000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4138

1.0000e-
005

0.4176
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 17 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 210
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

2.7500e-
003

0.0587

0.0493

7.0000e-
005

2.0600e-
003

0.0000

5.8862

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9329
Paving

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000
Total

3.0500e-
003

0.0587

0.0493

7.0000e-
005

2.0600e-
003

0.0000

5.8862

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9329
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4138

1.0000e-
005

0.4176
Total

2.0000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4138

1.0000e-
005

0.4176
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 18 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 211
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.2462

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

9.6000e-
004

6.5100e-
003

9.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Total

0.2472

6.5100e-
003

9.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1592

0.0000

0.1606
Total

8.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1592

0.0000

0.1606
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 19 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 212
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

0.2462

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

5.7000e-
004

0.0118

9.1600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

4.8000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Total

0.2468

0.0118

9.1600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

4.8000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1592

0.0000

0.1606
Total

8.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1592

0.0000

0.1606
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 20 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 213
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.0861

0.1457

0.8158

1.9500e-
003

0.1925

1.6000e-
003

0.1941

0.0515

1.5000e-
003

0.0530

0.0000
182.9558
182.9558

9.5000e-
003

9.9200e-
003
186.1497
Unmitigated

0.0861

0.1457

0.8158

1.9500e-
003

0.1925

1.6000e-
003

0.1941

0.0515

1.5000e-
003

0.0530

0.0000
182.9558
182.9558

9.5000e-
003

9.9200e-
003
186.1497

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
175.24
175.24
175.24
513,395
513,395
City Park

0.00 0.00

0.00 Parking Lot

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total
175.24
175.24
175.24
513,395
513,395
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise

10.80 7.30

7.50 48.40

15.90 35.70
86 11
3 City Park

9.50 7.30

7.30 33.00

48.00 19.00
66 28
6 Parking Lot

9.50 7.30

7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00
0 0
0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 21 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 214
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975
City Park

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975
Parking Lot

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

10.2745

1.6600e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3761
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

10.2745

1.6600e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3761
NaturalGas
Mitigated

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 22 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 215
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
354823

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 23 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 216
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 24 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 217
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
107407

9.9377

1.6100e-
003

1.9000e-
004

10.0360
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
3640

0.3368

5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3401
Total

10.2745

1.6600e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3761
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 25 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 218
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Use only Natural Gas Hearths

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
107407

9.9377

1.6100e-
003

1.9000e-
004

10.0360
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
3640

0.3368

5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3401
Total

10.2745

1.6600e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3761
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 26 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 219
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.1338

0.0120

0.1974

7.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

11.5792

5.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.6537
Unmitigated

0.1671

0.0169

0.4990

1.0600e-
003

0.0511

6.5896

11.5792

18.1689

0.0313

2.1000e-
004

19.0135

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0246

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1023

0.0000

0.0000
Hearth

0.0344

0.0147

0.3058

1.0500e-
003

0.0500

6.5896

11.2634

17.8530

0.0310

2.1000e-
004

18.6901
Landscaping

5.8200e-
003

2.2300e-
003

0.1932

1.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

0.0000

0.3158

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.3234
Total

0.1671

0.0169

0.4990

1.0600e-
003

0.0511

6.5896

11.5792

18.1689

0.0313

2.1000e-
004

19.0135
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 27 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 220
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0246

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1023

0.0000

0.0000
Hearth

1.1400e-
003

9.7300e-
003

4.1400e-
003

6.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

0.0000

11.2634

2.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.3303
Landscaping

5.8200e-
003

2.2300e-
003

0.1932

1.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

0.0000

0.3158

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.3234
Total

0.1338

0.0120

0.1974

7.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

11.5792

5.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.6537
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 28 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 221
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

1.7465

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5268
Unmitigated

1.7700

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5505

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.694 /

1.06796

1.7314

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5116
City Park
0 /

0.119148

0.0386

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0390
Parking Lot
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.7700

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5505
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 29 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 222
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.694 /

1.00281

1.7103

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.4903
City Park
0 /

0.11188

0.0362

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0366
Parking Lot
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.7465

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5268
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 30 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 223
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Unmitigated

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.96 2.4278

0.1435

0.0000

6.0147
City Park

0.01 2.0300e-
003

1.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.0300e-
003
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 31 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 224
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.96 2.4278

0.1435

0.0000

6.0147
City Park

0.01 2.0300e-
003

1.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.0300e-
003
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 32 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 225
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 7/14/2022 4:51 PM

Page 33 of 33 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 226
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated
Fresno County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Total project site is 1.63 acres
Construction Phase - Default schedule
Demolition - Demolition of a single-family residnece
Grading - Balanced site, no soil export or import
Vehicle Trips - TBD
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - construction equipment tier Area Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation - Project would implement low mainatance landscape features

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking Structure

26.00 Space

0.23 10,400.00
0 City Park

0.10 Acre

0.10 4,356.00
0 Apartments Low Rise

26.00 Dwelling Unit

1.63 26,000.00
74 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.2 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2024
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98

0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 1 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 227
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblConstDustMitigation
WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed
0 15
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 2.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 8.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 2 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 228
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2023

0.4303

1.4213

1.5445

2.8800e-
003

0.0466

0.0621

0.1087

0.0168

0.0596

0.0764

0.0000
242.3175
242.3175

0.0404

1.9800e-
003
243.9179
Maximum

0.4303

1.4213

1.5445

2.8800e-
003

0.0466

0.0621

0.1087

0.0168

0.0596

0.0764

0.0000
242.3175
242.3175

0.0404

0.2890

0.4186

1.6202

2.8800e-
003

0.0349

3.8800e-
003

0.0388

0.0113

3.8600e-
003

0.0152

0.0000
242.3173
242.3173

0.0404

1.9800e-
003
243.9177
Maximum

0.2890

0.4186

1.6202

2.8800e-
003

0.0349

3.8800e-
003

0.0388

0.0113

3.8600e-
003

0.0152

0.0000
242.3173
242.3173

0.0404

1.9800e-
003
243.9177
Mitigated Construction
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic

1.63 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic

1.63 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 3 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 229
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

32.83 70.55
-4.90

0.00 25.11

93.75 64.30

32.68 93.52

80.14 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 1-2-2023
4-1-2023

0.4634

0.1040
2 4-2-2023
7-1-2023

0.4415

0.1416
3 7-2-2023
9-30-2023

0.4415

0.1416
Highest

0.4634

0.1416

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.1338

0.0120

0.1974

7.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

11.5792

5.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.6537
Energy

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

33.9242

2.7900e-
003

6.4000e-
004

34.1849
Mobile

0.0932

0.1576

0.8826

2.1100e-
003

0.2083

1.7300e-
003

0.2100

0.0557

1.6200e-
003

0.0573

0.0000
197.9352
197.9352

0.0103

0.0107
201.3907
Waste

0.0000

2.4298

0.0000

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Water

0.0000

0.5374

1.2325

1.7700

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5505
Total

0.2289

0.1859

1.0869

2.2800e-
003

0.2083

4.9100e-
003

0.2132

0.0557

4.8000e-
003

0.0605

2.9672
244.6710
247.6383

0.2126

0.0129
256.7995
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 4 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 230
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.1338

0.0120

0.1974

7.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

11.5792

5.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.6537
Energy

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

33.9242

2.7900e-
003

6.4000e-
004

34.1849
Mobile

0.0932

0.1576

0.8826

2.1100e-
003

0.2083

1.7300e-
003

0.2100

0.0557

1.6200e-
003

0.0573

0.0000
197.9352
197.9352

0.0103

0.0107
201.3907
Waste

0.0000

2.4298

0.0000

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Water

0.0000

0.5374

1.2091

1.7465

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5268
Total

0.2289

0.1859

1.0869

2.2800e-
003

0.2083

4.9100e-
003

0.2132

0.0557

4.8000e-
003

0.0605

2.9672
244.6476
247.6148

0.2126

0.0129
256.7759
Mitigated Operational

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.01

0.01 0.00

0.00 0.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 5 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 231
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
2/7/2023
11/13/2023
5 200
5 Paving
Paving
11/14/2023
11/27/2023
5 10
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
11/28/2023
12/11/2023
5 10
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 8.00
97 0.37
Site Preparation
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 7.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 6.00
231

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
1 8.00
132

Page 6 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 232
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

0.00 8.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
3 8.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
4 10.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
7 25.00

5.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
5 13.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 5.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 7 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 233
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

8.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.6000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000

1.3000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0147

0.1432

0.1346

2.4000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

6.3300e-
003

0.0000

21.0866

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Total

0.0147

0.1432

0.1346

2.4000e-
004

8.6000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

7.6300e-
003

1.3000e-
004

6.3300e-
003

6.4600e-
003

0.0000

21.0866

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

7.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2266

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.2373
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

3.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

0.8276

2.0000e-
005

0.8353
Total

4.1000e-
004

7.6000e-
004

3.1800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

1.0542

2.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

1.0725
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 8 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 234
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

3.9000e-
004

0.0000

3.9000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.8100e-
003

0.0122

0.1472

2.4000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

0.0000

21.0865

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Total

2.8100e-
003

0.0122

0.1472

2.4000e-
004

3.9000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

7.6000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

4.3000e-
004

0.0000

21.0865

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

7.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2266

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.2373
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

3.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

0.8276

2.0000e-
005

0.8353
Total

4.1000e-
004

7.6000e-
004

3.1800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

1.0542

2.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

1.0725
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 9 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 235
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

6.2700e-
003

0.0000

6.2700e-
003

3.0000e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.1300e-
003

0.0124

6.6400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

5.1000e-
004

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5236
Total

1.1300e-
003

0.0124

6.6400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.2700e-
003

5.1000e-
004

6.7800e-
003

3.0000e-
003

4.7000e-
004

3.4700e-
003

0.0000

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0000

0.0514
Total

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0000

0.0514
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 10 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 236
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

2.8200e-
003

0.0000

2.8200e-
003

1.3500e-
003

0.0000

1.3500e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.1000e-
004

9.1000e-
004

8.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5236
Total

2.1000e-
004

9.1000e-
004

8.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8200e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.8500e-
003

1.3500e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.3800e-
003

0.0000

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0000

0.0514
Total

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0000

0.0514
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 11 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 237
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0142

0.0000

0.0142

6.8500e-
003

0.0000

6.8500e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6700e-
003

0.0289

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6501
Total

2.6700e-
003

0.0289

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

0.0142

1.2100e-
003

0.0154

6.8500e-
003

1.1100e-
003

7.9600e-
003

0.0000

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.0000

0.1285
Total

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.0000

0.1285
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 12 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 238
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

6.3700e-
003

0.0000

6.3700e-
003

3.0800e-
003

0.0000

3.0800e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

5.0000e-
004

2.1900e-
003

0.0218

4.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6501
Total

5.0000e-
004

2.1900e-
003

0.0218

4.0000e-
005

6.3700e-
003

7.0000e-
005

6.4400e-
003

3.0800e-
003

7.0000e-
005

3.1500e-
003

0.0000

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.0000

0.1285
Total

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.0000

0.1285
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 13 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 239
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

0.1523

1.1710

1.2611

2.2100e-
003

0.0515

0.0497

0.0000
181.5991
181.5991

0.0308

0.0000
182.3701
Total

0.1523

1.1710

1.2611

2.2100e-
003

0.0515

0.0497

0.0000
181.5991
181.5991

0.0308

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

5.4000e-
004

0.0220

6.5800e-
003

1.0000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

1.4000e-
004

3.4600e-
003

9.6000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.0900e-
003

0.0000

9.6163

5.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

10.0489
Worker

7.7400e-
003

5.0100e-
003

0.0591

1.7000e-
004

0.0200

1.0000e-
004

0.0201

5.3100e-
003

9.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
003

0.0000

15.9151

4.8000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

16.0629
Total

8.2800e-
003

0.0270

0.0657

2.7000e-
004

0.0233

2.4000e-
004

0.0235

6.2700e-
003

2.2000e-
004

6.4900e-
003

0.0000

25.5314

5.3000e-
004

1.9100e-
003

26.1119
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 14 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 240
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

0.0293

0.3712

1.3124

2.2100e-
003

3.0300e-
003

0.0000
181.5989
181.5989

0.0308

0.0000
182.3698
Total

0.0293

0.3712

1.3124

2.2100e-
003

3.0300e-
003

0.0000
181.5989
181.5989

0.0308

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

5.4000e-
004

0.0220

6.5800e-
003

1.0000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

1.4000e-
004

3.4600e-
003

9.6000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.0900e-
003

0.0000

9.6163

5.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

10.0489
Worker

7.7400e-
003

5.0100e-
003

0.0591

1.7000e-
004

0.0200

1.0000e-
004

0.0201

5.3100e-
003

9.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
003

0.0000

15.9151

4.8000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

16.0629
Total

8.2800e-
003

0.0270

0.0657

2.7000e-
004

0.0233

2.4000e-
004

0.0235

6.2700e-
003

2.2000e-
004

6.4900e-
003

0.0000

25.5314

5.3000e-
004

1.9100e-
003

26.1119
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 15 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 241
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

3.2200e-
003

0.0312

0.0440

7.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

5.8862

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9329
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

3.2200e-
003

0.0312

0.0440

7.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

5.8862

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4138

1.0000e-
005

0.4176
Total

2.0000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4138

1.0000e-
005

0.4176
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 16 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 242
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

8.0000e-
004

3.4600e-
003

0.0493

7.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

5.8862

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9329
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

8.0000e-
004

3.4600e-
003

0.0493

7.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

5.8862

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4138

1.0000e-
005

0.4176
Total

2.0000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4138

1.0000e-
005

0.4176
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 17 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 243
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

0.2462

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

9.6000e-
004

6.5100e-
003

9.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Total

0.2472

6.5100e-
003

9.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1592

0.0000

0.1606
Total

8.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1592

0.0000

0.1606
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 18 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 244
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

0.2462

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.5000e-
004

6.4000e-
004

9.1600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Total

0.2464

6.4000e-
004

9.1600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1592

0.0000

0.1606
Total

8.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1592

0.0000

0.1606
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 19 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 245
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

0.0932

0.1576

0.8826

2.1100e-
003

0.2083

1.7300e-
003

0.2100

0.0557

1.6200e-
003

0.0573

0.0000
197.9352
197.9352

0.0103

0.0107
201.3907
Unmitigated

0.0932

0.1576

0.8826

2.1100e-
003

0.2083

1.7300e-
003

0.2100

0.0557

1.6200e-
003

0.0573

0.0000
197.9352
197.9352

0.0103

0.0107
201.3907

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
190.32
211.64
163.28
555,181
555,181
City Park

0.08 0.20

0.22 246
246
Enclosed Parking Structure

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total
190.40
211.84
163.50
555,426
555,426
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise

10.80 7.30

7.50 48.40

15.90 35.70
86 11
3 City Park

9.50 7.30

7.30 33.00

48.00 19.00
66 28
6 Enclosed Parking Structure

9.50 7.30

7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00
0 0
0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 20 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 246
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975
City Park

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975
Enclosed Parking Structure

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

14.9895

2.4300e-
003

2.9000e-
004

15.1377
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

14.9895

2.4300e-
003

2.9000e-
004

15.1377
NaturalGas
Mitigated

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 21 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 247
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 22 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 248
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.9100e-
003

0.0164

6.9600e-
003

1.0000e-
004

1.3200e-
003

0.0000

18.9347

3.6000e-
004

3.5000e-
004

19.0472
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 23 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 249
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
107407

9.9377

1.6100e-
003

1.9000e-
004

10.0360
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Enclosed Parking
Structure
54600

5.0518

8.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

5.1018
Total

14.9895

2.4300e-
003

2.9000e-
004

15.1377
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 24 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 250
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Use only Natural Gas Hearths

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
107407

9.9377

1.6100e-
003

1.9000e-
004

10.0360
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Enclosed Parking
Structure
54600

5.0518

8.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

5.1018
Total

14.9895

2.4300e-
003

2.9000e-
004

15.1377
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 25 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 251
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.1338

0.0120

0.1974

7.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

11.5792

5.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.6537
Unmitigated

0.1338

0.0120

0.1974

7.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

11.5792

5.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.6537

0.0246

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1023

0.0000

0.0000
Hearth

1.1400e-
003

9.7300e-
003

4.1400e-
003

6.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

0.0000

11.2634

2.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.3303
Landscaping

5.8200e-
003

2.2300e-
003

0.1932

1.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

0.0000

0.3158

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.3234
Total

0.1338

0.0120

0.1974

7.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

11.5792

5.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.6537
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 26 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 252
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0246

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1023

0.0000

0.0000
Hearth

1.1400e-
003

9.7300e-
003

4.1400e-
003

6.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

0.0000

11.2634

2.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.3303
Landscaping

5.8200e-
003

2.2300e-
003

0.1932

1.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

0.0000

0.3158

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.3234
Total

0.1338

0.0120

0.1974

7.0000e-
005

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

11.5792

5.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

11.6537
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 27 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 253
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

1.7465

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5268
Unmitigated

1.7700

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5505

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.694 /

1.06796

1.7314

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5116
City Park
0 /

0.119148

0.0386

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0390
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.7700

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5505
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 28 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 254
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.694 /

1.00281

1.7103

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.4903
City Park
0 /

0.11188

0.0362

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0366
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.7465

0.0554

1.3300e-
003

3.5268
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 29 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 255
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Unmitigated

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.96 2.4278

0.1435

0.0000

6.0147
City Park

0.01 2.0300e-
003

1.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.0300e-
003
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 30 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 256
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.96 2.4278

0.1435

0.0000

6.0147
City Park

0.01 2.0300e-
003

1.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.0300e-
003
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

2.4298

0.1436

0.0000

6.0197
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

Page 31 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 257
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 10/13/2023 9:45 AM

Page 32 of 32 ends

DeWolf Apartments Project - Mitigated - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 258
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

10/13/23 (\\lsaazfiles.file.core.windows.net\projects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments\PRODUCTS\AQ GHG\DeWolf Apartments AQ GHG Memo 101323.docx)

ATTACHMENT B

HRA MODEL SNAPSHOTS
259
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Project Location

260
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Site Plan

261
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Receptor Grid

262
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Construction Cancer Risk – Residential Receptors

Construction Cancer Risk – School Receptors

263
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Control Pathway
AERMOD
Total Deposition (Dry & Wet)
Dry Deposition
Wet Deposition
Output Type
Concentration
Regulatory Default Non-Default Options
Dispersion Options
C:\Users\Jessica.Coria\OneDrive - LSA Associates\Desktop\DeWolfAptsH Titles
Dispersion Options
Population:

Name (Optional):

Roughness Length:

Plume Depletion
Dry Removal
Wet Removal
Output Warnings
No Output Warnings
Non-fatal Warnings for Non-sequential Met Data
Dispersion Coefficient
Urban
Pollutant / Averaging Time / Terrain Options
TG: Meters
RE: Meters
SO: Meters1 2 3 4 6 8 12 24
ElevatedFlat
Hours Terrain Height Options
Averaging Time Options
Option not availableHalf Life of 4 hrs will be used
Exponential DecayPollutant Type
Annual
Month Period
PM2.5
Flagpole Receptors
NoYes
Default Height = 0.00 m
10/13/2023CO - 1 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software Project File: C:\Users\Jessica.Coria\OneDrive - LSA Associates\Desktop\DeWolfAptsHRA\DeWolfAptsHRA.isc 264 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Control Pathway
AERMOD
Optional Files
Re-Start File Multi-Year Analyses Event Input File Error Listing File Init File
Detailed Error Listing File
Filename: DeWolfAptsHRA.err
10/13/2023CO - 2 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software Project File: C:\Users\Jessica.Coria\OneDrive - LSA Associates\Desktop\DeWolfAptsHRA\DeWolfAptsHRA.isc 265 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Meteorology Pathway
AERMOD
Met Input Data
Surface Met Data
Profile Met Data
Fresno 93193\Fresno_2013-2017.SFC
Default AERMET format
Filename:

Format Type:

Filename:

Format Type:

Fresno 93193\Fresno_2013-2017.PFL
Potential Temperature Profile
Base Elevation above MSL (for Primary Met Tower): 101.00 [m] Wind Direction
Rotation Adjustment [deg]:

Meteorological Station Data
Upper Air
Station No. Year Station Name
Surface
Stations X Coordinate [m] Y Coordinate [m]
2013 FRESNO/AIR TERMINAL
2013 OAKLAND/WSO AP
Default AERMET format
Wind Speed
Wind Speeds are Vector Mean (Not Scalar Means)
Data Period
Start Date: End Date:1/1/2013 12/31/2017Start Hour: End Hour: 241 Data Period to Process

10.8 8.23

5.14 3.09

1.54 No Upper Bound
Wind Speed [m/s]Stability CategoryWind Speed [m/s]
F
E
D
C
B
A
Stability Category
Wind Speed Categories
ME - 1 10/13/2023AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software Project File: C:\Users\Jessica.Coria\OneDrive - LSA Associates\Desktop\DeWolfAptsHRA\DeWolfAptsHRA.isc 266 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Polygon Area Sources
Source Type: AREA POLY
Source: PAREA1
X Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Y Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Base
Elevation
(Optional)
Emission
Rate
[g/ (s-m^2)]
Release
Height
[m]
Initial
Vertical
Dim. [m]
Number of
Vertices
(or sides)
111.97 3.05 10 263809.80 4075368.87 0.00013
263895.23 4075365.050.00013
263899.05 4075365.050.00013
263896.85 4075287.700.00013
263894.79 4075284.470.00013
263891.56 4075282.270.00013
263885.25 4075282.410.00013
263860.59 4075283.290.00013
263859.71 4075282.410.00013
263805.69 4075284.760.00013
10/13/2023SO1 - 1 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software Project File: C:\Users\Jessica.Coria\OneDrive - LSA Associates\Desktop\DeWolfAptsHRA\DeWolfAptsHRA.isc 267 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Source
Link
Evel Data Descr.

Telescoping Grid Spacing (m) Distance (m)
Grid 1 20 100
Grid 2 50 250
Grid 3 100 500
Grid 4 250 800
Comments
Location
Provided By
Years
Elevation (m)
Link
Regulatory Options
Pollutant Type
Averaging Period
Dispersion Coefficient
County
Urban Grouping / Pop Y 124,556
# of Sensitive Receptors
Source Type
Project Area (m2)
Ht. of Source (m)
Starting Age
Age Range
Receptor Type
Assessment Type
Exposure Duration
Intake Rate
Comments
Pathways
Deposition Rate
TAH < 16 yrs
TAH ≥ 16 yrs
2013-2017
101
Construction Modeling Specific Inputs
Default
AERMOD Input Options
Construction Area Parameters
General AERMOD Input Parameters
Meteorological Dataset
Fresno Air Terminal

SJVAPCD

7.5 min DEM not available
Receptors on roads or parking lot areas have been removed.

Project Receptor Grid
Based on site plan
Project Boundary
Project Elevation Data
Lakes Environmental
http://www.webgis.com/terraindata.html
https://www.valleyair.org/busind/pto/tox_resources/airqualitymonitoring.htm #met_data
3rd Trimester
3rd Trimester - 1 Year
Sensitive Scenario Parameters
Urban
1,224
Fresno
Other
Period & Hourly
Construction
School Receptors

3.048
General HARP Input Parameters
7,539.10
Polygon Area
Individual Resident
Cancer / Chronic / Acute
1 RMP using the Derived Merthod
Sensitive Pathway Parameters
SCAQMD Manadatory minimum Pathways

0.02 N
N 268
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Zone 11
Datum WGS 1984
KML File Name
Description Receptor Type Model Type UTM X UTM Y Latitude Longitude Unmitigated T2 T2L3 T4 Row Construction Sensitive Cancer Risk 263764.94 4075321.74 34.09837241 -117.4714105 Col 2 3 4 5 4 Construction Sensitive Chronic HI 263764.94 4075321.74 34.09837241 -117.4714105 2 3 4 5 7 Construction Sensitive Acute HI 0 0 2 3 4 5 10
Construction Sensitive PM 2.5 263764.94 4075321.74 34.09837241 -117.4714105 2 3 4 5 13 Construction School Cancer Risk 263927.18 4075291.78 12 13 14 15 4 Construction School Chronic HI 263936.88 4075615.03 12 13 14 15 7 Construction School Acute HI 0 0 12 13 14 15 10
Construction School PM 2.5 263927.18 4075291.78 12 13 14 15 13 Construction Worker Cancer Risk 0.00 0.00 34.09845962 -117.4687945 7 8 9 10 4 Construction Worker Chronic HI 0.00 0.00 34.09845962 -117.4687945 7 8 9 10 7 Construction Worker Acute HI 0 0 7 8 9 10 10
Construction Worker PM 2.5 0.00 0.00 34.09845962 -117.4687945 7 8 9 10 13 Operational Sensitive Cancer Risk 30 yr 0 0 34.10545389 -117.4711209 3 4 5 2 18 Operational Sensitive Cancer Risk 70 yr 0 0 34.10545389 -117.4711209 3 4 5 2 20 Operational Sensitive Chronic HI 0 0 34.10545389 -117.4711209 3 4 5 2 22 Operational Sensitive Acute HI 0 0 34.10416908 -117.4713116 3 4 5 2 24 Operational Sensitive PM 2.5 0 0 34.10545389 -117.4711209 3 4 5 2 26 Operational Worker Cancer Risk 25 yr 0 0 34.09847446 -117.4700342 8 9 10 7 18 Operational Worker Chronic HI 0 0 34.09847446 -117.4700342 8 9 10 7 20 Operational Worker Acute HI 0 0 34.0990999 -117.4688086 8 9 10 7 22 Operational Worker PM 2.5 0 0 34.09847446 -117.4700342 8 9 10 7 24 Operational School Cancer Risk 9 yr 0 0 13 14 15 12 18
Operational School Chronic HI 0 0 13 14 15 12 20
Operational School Acute HI 0 0 13 14 15 12 22
Operational School PM 2.5 0 0 13 14 15 12 24
ESL2201.56 Project MEI Sensitive
Process Coordinates
269
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Unmitigated Mitigated T4 Unmitigated Mitigated T4

39.26 2.45 63.78 3.99
Unmitigated Mitigated T4 Unmitigated Mitigated T4

4.41E-02 2.76E-03 7.17E-02 4.48E-03
Unmitigated Mitigated T4 Unmitigated Mitigated T4

0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
Unmitigated Mitigated T4 Unmitigated Mitigated T4

0.221 0.014 0.3586 0.0224
Construction
MEI (School) - Cancer Risk (in a Million)
HARP Rec #: 21
X: 263927.18 Y: 4075291.78
MEI (School) - Chronic Hazard Index
HARP Rec #: 1
X: 263936.88 Y: 4075615.03
MEI (School) - Acute Hazard Index
HARP Rec #: NA
X: NA Y: NA
MEI (School) - PM 2.5
HARP Rec #: 21
X: 263927.18 Y: 4075291.78
Construction
MEI (Sensitive) - Cancer Risk (in a
Million)
HARP Rec #: 1
X: 263764.94 Y: 4075321.74
MEI (Sensitive) - Chronic Hazard Index
HARP Rec #: 1
X: 263764.94 Y: 4075321.74
MEI (Sensitive) - Acute Hazard Index
HARP Rec #: NA
X: NA Y: NA
MEI (Sensitive) - PM 2.5
HARP Rec #: 1
X: 263764.94 Y: 4075321.74
270
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

August 2022

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

DEWOLF APARTMENT S PROJECT

CITY OF CLOVIS , CALIFORNIA

Appendix B
271
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

August 2022

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

DEWOLF APARTMENT S PROJECT

CITY OF CLOVIS , CALIFORNIA

Prepared for:

Peter Sumal
3008 North Vahe Avenue
Fresno, CA 93737

Prepared by:

LSA Associates, Inc.
285 South Street, Suite P
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
(805) 782-0745

LSA Project No. HPT2201
272
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA
\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) prepared this Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) for the proposed DeWolf Apartments Project (project) located at 3182 DeWolf Avenue, northwest of the intersection of DeWolf Avenue and Ashlan Avenue, in the City of Clovis, Fresno County, California. The project consists of the construction of 26 multi-family apartment units on approximately 1.62-acres. The eastern portion of the project site is developed with a single-family residential home and the remaining areas are undeveloped. The site is located on the margin of urban portions of the City of Clovis with no connection to undisturbed or natural lands.

In May 2022, LSA biologists conducted a literature review and records search to identify the existence and potential for occurrence of sensitive or special-status plant and animal species in the vicinity of the project site. Federal and state lists of sensitive species were also examined. Current electronic database records reviewed included the California Natural Diversity Database, California Native Plant Society’s Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Wetlands Inventory. Historic and current aerial imagery, existing environmental reports for developments in the project vicinity, regional habitat conservation plans, and local land use policies related to biological resources were also reviewed. A field survey covering the project site was conducted on May 5, 2022.

The project site is strictly upland in nature with well-drained soils and vegetation consisting of ruderal vegetation with patches of mixed herbaceous non-native grasses/invasive species and bare ground in several areas. Ongoing soil disturbance and the resulting competitive exclusion by invasive, nonnative plants limit the potential for native flora to occur on the project site. No native or special-status vegetation communities exist in the project site or surrounding parcels. No special- status plant species were observed during the field survey and none are expected to occur due to historical and ongoing anthropogenic disturbances.

Habitat in the project site is considered low quality with respect to most of the regionally occurring special-status animal species, and no special-status species were observed during the field survey.

However, two special-status animal species, burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) and Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni), have some potential to occur on the project site due to the presence of potentially suitable habitat and known occurrence records in the project vicinity. The project site also contains suitable foraging and nesting habitat for a variety of common resident and migratory bird species.

With the implementation of recommended impact avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures—including pre-construction surveys and avoidance of sensitive species and nesting birds—there would be no significant impacts to special-status biological resources resulting from the project.
273
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Attachments .................................................................................................................................. ii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 1 Project Setting ............................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 3 Literature Review and Records Search ......................................................................................... 3 Field Survey ................................................................................................................................... 4 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 5 Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types .......................................................................... 5 Ruderal ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Residential Development ......................................................................................................................... 6 Soils 6
San Joaquin Sandy Loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA) 17 ............... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Special-Status Biological Resources .............................................................................................. 6 Special-Status Natural Communities ........................................................................................................ 7 Special-Status Plants ................................................................................................................................ 7 Special-Status Animals ............................................................................................................................. 7 Critical Habitat .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Jurisdictional Aquatic Resources .............................................................................................................. 8 Wildlife Movement and Habitat Connectivity .......................................................................................... 8 Regional Habitat Conservation Plans and Local Policies .......................................................................... 8 IMPACT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES ............................ 10 Special-Status Natural Communities ........................................................................................... 10 Special-Status Species ................................................................................................................. 10 Critical Habitat ............................................................................................................................. 12 Jurisdictional Aquatic Resources ................................................................................................. 12 Wildlife Movement and Habitat Connectivity............................................................................. 12 Regional Habitat Conservation Plans and Local Policies ............................................................. 12 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 12 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 13

TABLES
Table A: Vegetation and Land Cover Types Within the Project site ....................................................................... 5

ATTACHMENTS
Appendix A (Figures), Appendix B (Site Plan), Appendix C (Representative Site Photos), Appendix D (Vascular Species Observed), Appendix E (Regional Special-Status Species) 274
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA
\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 1

INTRODUCTION
LSA has prepared this Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) for the proposed DeWolf Avenue Apartments Project (project) located at the northwest corner of DeWolf Avenue and Ashlan Avenue Railroad in the City of Clovis (City), Fresno County, California (refer to Figure 1, Project Location; all figures are provided in Appendix A). The purpose of this report is to describe and document biological resources—including sensitive and special-status species—known to occur or with the potential to occur on the proposed project site. This technical information is provided for project planning purposes and review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), California Endangered Species Act (CESA), the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA), and other pertinent regulations.

The BRA conducted for the project involved the following components:
• Reviewing existing relevant scientific literature and other pertinent information related to the project site;
• Creating a list of regionally occurring special-status species determined to have the potential to occur on or in the vicinity of the project site;
• Characterizing the vegetation communities present within the project site; • Evaluating the potential for the occurrence of special-status plant and wildlife species within th
e project site;
• Assessing the potential for the project to adversely impact existing biological resources; and • Recommending avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures to avoid or minimize any potentially significant project-related impacts to biological resources.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project involves the construction of 26 multi-family apartment units (refer to Appendix B, Site Plan). Regional access to the site is provided from Aslan Avenue to the south and DeWolf Avenue to the east. The project would not require any work within undeveloped lands outside of the approximately 1.62-acre project site.

PROJECT SETTING
The project site is located along the eastern portion of the San Joaquin Valley floor in Fresno County.

Specifically, the project site is located on Assessor’s Parcel Number 55-042-70 in the eastern quarter of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Clovis, California, 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map (refer to Figure 1). The “project site” discussed in this report refers to all areas within the 1.62- acre property where temporary and permanent ground disturbance would occur.

The project site contains one single family residential home that is currently unoccupied, and the remaining areas are undeveloped supporting ruderal vegetation (refer to Figure 2). According to historic aerial imagery, vegetation within the project site has been regularly maintained and the site has remained in its current condition for more than 20 years. Adjacent parcels consist of single- family homes and a high school. Recent developments along the margins of the City of Clovis and 275
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 2 expansion into ranch land settlements have brought increased urban development throughout lands previously used for agriculture. Some lands in the vicinity of the project site are fallow or active agricultural lands; however, most of the lands are developed and are a mixture of schools and residential uses. There are no undisturbed open spaces in the vicinity of the project site.

The project site is located within the San Joaquin Valley Sub-region of the California Floristic Province (Baldwin, et al. 2012) and within the Mill Ditch watershed (Hydrologic Unit Code # 180300090503). The project site is flat with almost no topographic variation and is at approximately 373 feet (113 meters) above mean sea level in elevation. There are no drainage features, depressional wetlands, or riparian areas present in the project site.

276
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 3

METHODS

LITERATURE REVIEW AND RECORDS SEARCH
LSA Biologist Kelly McDonald conducted a literature review and records search on May 2, 2022, to identify the existence and potential for occurrence of sensitive or special-status1 plant and animal species in the vicinity of the project site. Federal and State lists of sensitive species were also examined. Current electronic database records reviewed included the following:
• California Natural Diversity Data Base information (CNDDB – RareFind 5), which is administered by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), formerly known as the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). This database covers sensitive plant and animal species as well as sensitive natural communities that occur in California. Records from nine USGS quadrangles surrounding the project site (Malaga, Sanger, Clovis, Round Mountain, Friant, Academy, Fresno South, Lanes Bridge, and Fresno North) were obtained from this database to inform the field survey.
• California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants, which utilizes four specific categories or “lists” of sensitive plant species to assist with the conservation of rare or endangered botanical resources. All of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Ranks 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B are intended to meet the status definitions of “threatened” or “endangered” in CESA and the California Department of Fish and Game Code and are considered by CNPS to be eligible for State listing. At the discretion of the CEQA Lead Agency, impacts to these species may be analyzed as such, pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15125(c) and 15380. Plants in Rank 3 (limited information; review list), Rank 4 (limited distribution; watch list), or that are considered Locally Unusual and Significant may be analyzed under CEQA if there is sufficient information to assess potential significant impacts. Records from the nine USGS quadrangles surrounding the project site were obtained from this database to inform the field survey.
• United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) Online System, which lists all proposed, candidate, threatened, and endangered species managed by the Endangered Species Program of the USFWS that have the potential to occur on or near a particular site. This database also lists all known critical habitats, national wildlife refuges, and migratory birds that could potentially be impacted by activities from a proposed project. An IPaC Trust Resource Report (USFWS 2022a) was generated for the project area.

1 For the purposed of this report, the term “special-status species” refers to those species that are listed or proposed for listing under the CESA and/or FESA, California Fully Protected Species, California Species of Special Concern, and California Special Animals. It should be noted that “Species of Special Concern” and “California Special Animal” are administrative designations made by the CDFW and carry no formal legal protection status. However, Section 15380 of the CEQA Guidelines indicates that these species should be included in an analysis of project impacts if they can be shown to meet the criteria of sensitivity outlined therein.
277
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 4 • Designated and Proposed USFWS Critical Habitat Polygons were reviewed to determine whether critical habitat has been designated or proposed within or in the vicinity of the project site (USFWS 2022b).
• The USFWS National Wetlands Inventory was reviewed to determine whether any wetlands or surface waters of the United States have been previously-identified in the survey area (USFWS 2022c).
• eBird: eBird is a real-time, online checklist program launched in 2002 by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and National Audubon Society. It provides rich data sources for basic information on bird abundance and distribution at a variety of spatial and temporal scales. eBird occurrence records within the project site and a 5-mile radius around the project site were reviewed in March 2022 (eBird 2022).

In addition to the databases listed above, historic and current aerial imagery, existing environmental reports for developments in the project vicinity, and local land use policies related to biological resources were reviewed.

FIELD SURVEY
A general biological survey of the project site was conducted by LSA Biologist Kelly McDonald on May 5, 2022. The project site was surveyed on foot, and all biological resources observed were noted and mapped. Suitable habitat for any species of interest or concern was duly noted, and general site conditions were photographed (Appendix C, Site Photos). The field survey took place on a sunny morning with weather conditions conducive to the detection of plant and animal species. 278
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 5

RESULTS
This section summarizes the environmental setting and provides further analysis of the data collected in the field. Discussions regarding the existing project site conditions, soils, vegetation communities, potentially occurring special-status biological resources, and habitat connectivity are presented below.

The project site consists of a relatively flat lot supporting ruderal vegetation and one single family residential home. Ruderal areas existing within the project site appear to be regularly maintained (e.g., mowed or disked). Perennial shrubs and ornamental trees are located within ornamentally landscaped areas associated with the single family residential home. Examples of the planted and maintained ornamental trees include tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima; a nonnative species), pines (Pinus sp.; non-native species), red gum eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis; non-native species), among others.

Habitat within the project site is considered low quality with respect to most of the special-status animal species identified during the literature review and the project site is not expected to support any special-status plant species (refer to Appendix E). Seven wildlife species were observed during the May 2022 field survey, including: northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), California quail (Callipepla californica), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), rock pigeon (Columba livia; nonnative species), California scrub jay (Aphelocoma californica), Botta’s pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), and European starling (Sturnus vulgaris; nonnative species).

No riparian habitat exists in the project site or on adjacent parcels and there are no depressional wetlands (e.g., vernal pools) or natural drainage features within the project site. The project site does not serve as a wildlife nursery or as a wildlife migration corridor. Further details regarding specific biological resources are provided in the following subsections.

VEGETATION COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER TYPES
The project site is strictly upland in nature with dominant vegetation consisting of non-native grasses and herbaceous invasive species within the regularly disturbed (e.g., ruderal) areas, and ornamental landscaping within the developed portions. Ongoing soil disturbance and the resulting competitive exclusion by invasive nonnative plants limit the potential for native flora to occur in the project site. No native or special-status vegetation communities exist in the project site.

The acreages of each vegetation community and land cover type occurring in the project site are shown in Table A, below. Representative photographs of the project site are presented in Appendix C, and Figure 3 provides a map of these vegetation and land cover types within the project site.

Table A: Vegetation and Land Cover Types Within the Project site Vegetation / Land Cover Type Acreage1
Ruderal 0.80
Residential Development 0.84
Total 1.64
Compiled: LSA (May 2022)
279
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 6 1 All acreages were calculated using geographic information system (GIS) measurements and are considered approximate.

A total of 35 vascular plant species were identified within the project site during the May 2022 field survey (refer to Appendix D). A total of 29 of these plant species (82 percent) represent nonnative taxa, reflecting a high level of disturbance within the project site.

Ruderal
Areas classified as ruderal consist of early successional nonnative grasses and pioneering herbaceous plants that readily colonize disturbed ground. Ruderal plants dominant within this area include weedy or pioneering species such as: Canadian horseweed (Erigeron canadensis), flax-leaved horseweed (Erigeron bonariensis), tumbleweed (Amaranthus albus), Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium), and jimsonweed (Datura wrightii). Several nonnative grasses were present in low cover which included Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) and brome fescue (Festuca bromoides).

Residential Development
Developed sites consist of paved areas, buildings, and other areas that are cleared or graded for anthropogenic purposes. A portion of the project site is developed with an unoccupied single family residential home surrounded by ornamental trees and landscaping.

SOILS
According to the NRCS online soil survey of Fresno County, the project site is underlaid by San Joaquin sandy loam, as shown on Figure 4.

The parent material of this soil type is alluvium derived from granite, occurring between 90 and 520 ft (27 and 158 m) in elevation. The drainage class of this soil type is moderately well drained, and it is typically composed of sandy loam, sandy clay loam, clay, cemented material, and loam. San Joaquin sandy loam usually typically occurs on terraces and fan remnants. This soil is not classified as hydric.

SPECIAL-STATUS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
The Clovis region supports various special-status natural communities, plants, and animals.

Appendix E provides tables that identify those special-status plant and animal species known to occur or that potentially occur in the vicinity of the project site (based on the literature review and experience in the region) and includes detailed information about each species’ habitat and distribution, State and Federal status designations, and probability of occurrence within the project site. As stated in the methodology section above, the background research included occurrence records from nine USGS topographic quadrangles surrounding the survey area. A nine USGS quadrangle search covers a large, variable geographic and topographic area containing numerous habitat types not found within or around the project site.

280
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 7 The following subsections provide specific discussions for special-status natural communities, plant and animal species, and habitats of concern (including critical habitat, jurisdictional aquatic resources, wildlife movement corridors, and regional and local habitat conservation plans).

Special-Status Natural Communities
The CNDDB search identified occurrences of four special-status natural (i.e., plant) communities within the nine-quad search area: Great Valley Mixed Riparian Forest, Northern Claypan Vernal Pool, Northern Hardpan Vernal Pool, and Sycamore Alluvial Woodland.

No special-status natural communities or conservation areas exist within the project site or in adjacent parcels. The project site is completely isolated and distant from all special-status natural communities that occur in the region.

Special-Status Plants
The literature review identified 16 special-status plant species that are known to occur within a nine-quad radius of the project site (refer to Appendix E). The majority of the rare plant species that were identified in the databases have specialized habitat requirements (i.e., they occur on predominantly alkaline soils, woodland, riparian, or wetland habitats, etc.) that do not occur within the project site.

Historic anthropogenic disturbances have greatly altered the natural hydrologic regimes and have either eliminated or greatly impacted the pre-settlement habitats needed to support the special- status plant species identified in the CNDDB and CNPS queries. As such, the specific habitats, soil substrates or “micro-climates” necessary for special-status plant species to occur are absent within the boundaries of the project site. Based on site observations coupled with the habitat suitability analysis, no special-status plant species are expected to occur within the project site. It is also unlikely that any source populations exist in adjacent or nearby parcels.

Special-Status Animals
The historic anthropogenic disturbances in the project site and adjacent parcels (i.e., development, etc.) have greatly altered, eliminated, or impacted the pre-settlement habitats needed to support most of the special-status animal species identified in the CNDDB and USFWS queries (refer to Appendix E). There are no known occurrences of any special-status animal species in the project site, and none were observed during the May 2022 field survey. Nonetheless, marginally suitable, isolated habitat for several regionally occurring special-status species is present in the project site and those species are discussed in further detail below.

Two special-status animal species, burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) and Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni) have low potential to occur in the project site due to the presence of potentially suitable habitat. However, no sign which would indicate occupation or use by these species (e.g., burrows, scat, stick nests, whitewash, or any other sign) was identified during the May 2022 survey. Several small mammal burrows, likely those of California vole (Microtus californicus), and/or Botta’s pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), were observed within the undeveloped portions of the project site.

However, none of the small mammal burrows observed exhibited features typical of occupied 281
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 8 burrowing owl burrows, and recent site usage is unlikely given the lack of suitable burrows observed and the lack of recent occurrence records in the vicinity.

Marginally suitable nesting and foraging habitat for Swainson’s hawk is present within the project site. There are also several eBird occurrence records of Swainson’s hawk foraging within the project vicinity, with the most recent from April 2022. The project site contains mature ornamental trees that could offer suitable nesting habitat, although no suitable stick nests were observed during the survey. Potentially suitable foraging habitat is present and corresponds to the mapped ruderal vegetation shown on Figure 3.

The project site provides foraging and nesting habitat for a variety of bird species that are protected while nesting under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code.

The evaluation of special-status animal species occurrence within the project site was based on a habitat suitability analysis. It did not include exhaustive surveys to determine their presence or absence, but did include direct observation of on-site and off-site conditions and a review of the available recorded occurrence data from the area to conclude whether or not a particular species could be expected to occur. Based on this analysis, it is unlikely that the remaining special-status wildlife species listed in Appendix E would occupy or otherwise utilize the habitat present within the project site. Significant adverse impacts to special-status wildlife species are not anticipated with the implementation of the recommended impact avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures described in further detail below.

Critical Habitat
The project site is not located within or adjacent to designated or proposed critical habitat for any species.

Jurisdictional Aquatic Resources
The project site is strictly upland in nature with well-drained soils. There are no records of wetlands or potential jurisdictional drainage features existing within the project site, and no potentially jurisdictional drainage features, wetlands, or riparian areas were observed on the project site.

Wildlife Movement and Habitat Connectivity
As the project site is isolated from natural areas, it is unlikely that the site serves as an important corridor for animals moving locally, regionally, or in broader migrations. Migratory bird species may utilize the project site for foraging; however, the usage is likely transient and limited to species that forage over open areas. The project site does not possess any characteristics that would indicate a locally significant stopover point for migratory species including raptors or waterfowl.

No known wildlife movement corridors occur within the project site or in the immediate vicinity.

Regional Habitat Conservation Plans and Local Policies
The City of Clovis and Fresno County currently do not have a regional Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) or Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The 2014 General Plan for the City of 282
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 9 Clovis outlines local relevant policies related to biological resources. Below is the list of relevant polices from the City of Clovis General Plan:
• Policy 2.6: Biological resources. Support the protection of biological resources through the conservation of high-quality habitat area.
• Policy 2.7: Native plants. Encourage the use of native and climate-appropriate plant species and prohibit the use of plant species known to be invasive.

The City of Clovis Municipal Code Chapter 9.30 Tree Protection Standards outlines a tree removal permitting process. Several trees are present within the project site; however, based on the Chapter

9.30.050 Exemptions, any tree located on developed single-family residential property is exempt from the tree removal process. Protected trees that are not exempt from the tree removal process include heritage trees, twelve inches or greater in diameter, multi-trunk trees, parkway trees, and trees required by a site plan review. Based on the current design, the project would not be required to apply for a tree removal permit due to the zoning classification exemption.

283
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 10

IMPACT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES
The following impact assessment and recommended mitigation measures are intended to support the CEQA review process. The project, as proposed by the applicant, coupled with LSA’s survey results and review of biological literature, provided the basis for this analysis. The impact discussion below addresses the range of impacts that could result from the proposed project, as well as recommended mitigation measures that would avoid, reduce, or compensate for such impacts.

SPECIAL-STATUS NATURAL COMMUNITIES
The project site does not contain any special-status natural communities and such habitats would not be impacted by the proposed project.

SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES
No special-status plant species are expected to occur within the project site or to be adversely affected by the proposed project.

While no special-status animal species (or signs of such species) were observed on site during the May 2022 survey, several gopher (or vole) burrows were observed within the project site, however the site lacks California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi) burrows which are more commonly used (and more suitable habitat) by burrowing owl, therefore further reduces the likelihood of occurrence. None of the gopher (or vole) burrows observed in the project site exhibited features typical of occupied burrowing owl burrows at the time of the survey, although there is some potential for use by these species within the ruderal land cover (0.8 ac) in the future.

Potentially significant direct and indirect impacts, including mortality, harassment, or other forms of incidental take, could occur if construction-related ground disturbance occurs in or around an occupied burrow.

No other special-status species were determined to have a moderate or high probability of occurrence on the project site (refer to Appendix E). The removal of the ruderal habitat documented on the project site is not anticipated to substantially impact the population sizes of any special- status animal species given the context and setting of the project site and additional habitats for such species in the project vicinity.

Mature ornamental trees on the project site could provide suitable nesting habitat for raptors or other shrub and tree-nesting species, such as Swainson’s hawk. Other birds, such as mourning dove, may nest in annual herbaceous cover within ruderal portions of the project site. Several species could also nest within the developed portions of the site. To ensure compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3500–3516, a pre- construction nesting bird survey is recommended prior to any vegetation clearing or land use changes planned to occur during the nesting bird season (January 1 through September 30). With successful implementation of Recommended Measure BIO-2, impacts to nesting birds would be avoided. Furthermore, Recommended Measure BIO-2a would be warranted in the unlikely event that Swainson’s hawk was found to be nesting within the project site during the pre-construction 284
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 11 nesting bird survey. It should be noted that coordination and permitting would be required with CDFW if impacts to occupied Swainson’s hawk nesting habitat are not avoided.

If unmitigated or avoided, potential direct and indirect impacts on special-status wildlife species and nesting birds could be considered potentially significant. However, implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-2a, as summarized below, would effectively mitigate any impacts on special-status wildlife species to less-than-significant levels.

Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Conduct Preconstruction Clearance Surveys for Burrowing Owl. A preconstruction clearance survey is required for burrowing owl no more than 30 calendar days prior to initiation of project activities.

All survey results must be delivered to the City of Clovis. If an active burrowing owl burrow is found within the project site, the applicant must coordinate with CDFW to obtain applicable agency
approval/direction prior to any ground disturbance activities on the site. Specific avoidance, den excavation, passive relocation, and compensatory mitigation activities shall be performed as required by CDFW. If no active burrowing owl burrows are identified, project activities may proceed as planned following the preconstruction survey.

Mitigation Measure BIO-2: Nesting Bird Surveys and Avoidance. If vegetation trimming/removal, construction, or grading activities are planned to commence within the active nesting bird season (February 15 through September 30), a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey no more than 5 days prior to the start of such activities. The nesting bird survey shall include the project site and areas immediately adjacent to the site that could potentially be affected by project-related activities such as noise, vibration, increased human activity, and dust, etc. For any active nest(s) identified, the qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate buffer zone around the active nest(s). The appropriate buffer shall be determined by the qualified biologist based on species, location, and the nature of the proposed activities. Project activities shall be avoided within the buffer zone until the nest is deemed no longer active by the qualified biologist. Documentation of all survey results shall be provided to the City.

Mitigation Measure BIO-2a: Compensatory Mitigation for Swainson’s Hawk. If an occupied Swainson’s hawk nest site is found within the project development limits during implementation of Mitigation Measure 2, the Applicant shall not proceed with any construction-related activities on the project site until the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has been consulted regarding the need to obtain an incidental take permit under the California Endangered Species Act 285
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 12 (CESA). Impacts will be minimized through permitting with CDFW and will be fully mitigated in accordance with CDFW requirements.

CRITICAL HABITAT
The project would not result in any impacts to critical habitat, and no additional mitigation is required.

JURISDICTIONAL AQUATIC RESOURCES
The proposed project would not result in any impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources, and no mitigation is required.

WILDLIFE MOVEMENT AND HABITAT CONNECTIVITY
The wildlife species that occur in the project vicinity are adapted to the urban-wildland interface, and the project would not introduce new affects to the area. The noise, vibration, light, dust, or human disturbance within construction areas would only temporarily deter wildlife from using areas in the immediate vicinity of construction activities. These indirect effects could temporarily alter migration behaviors, territories, or foraging habitats in select areas. However, because these are temporary effects, it is likely that wildlife already living and moving in close proximity to urban development would alter their normal functions for the duration of the project construction and then re-establish these functions once all temporary construction effects have been removed. The proposed project would not place any permanent barriers within any known wildlife movement corridors or interfere with habitat connectivity. The impact is considered less than significant, and no mitigation is required.

REGIONAL HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANS AND LOCAL POLICIES
The project would not impact non-sensitive land cover types that are not protected under any regional conservation plans or local policies, therefore, the project would not conflict with any regional habitat conservation plan related to the protection and conservation of biological resources, and no additional mitigation is required.

CONCLUSION
Based on field observations coupled with the habitat suitability analysis conducted for this assessment, the proposed project has low potential to impact several regionally-occurring special- status wildlife species, but is not anticipated to impact any special-status plant species, natural communities, or other habitats of concern. The implementation of the recommended mitigation measures detailed herein would avoid impacts on special-status (or otherwise protected) species, or reduce any potentially significant impacts on special-status wildlife species to a less than significant level.

286
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 13

REFERENCES

Baldwin, B.G., D.H. Goldman, D.J. Keil, R. Patterson, T.J. Rosatti, and D.H. Wilken, editors. 2012. The Jepson manual: vascular plants of California, second edition. University of California Press, Berkeley.

California Burrowing Owl Consortium. 1993. Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines. April 1993.

California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2022. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition v8). Available at: http://cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/inventory/. May 2022.

California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation.

State of California Natural Resources Agency. May 2022. ______. 1994. Staff Report Regarding Mitigation for Impacts to Swainson’s Hawk in the Central Valley of California. State of California Natural Resources Agency. November 1994 ______. 2022. California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB). Special Animals List. February 2022.

Periodic publication. 67 pp.
______. 2022. State of California, Department of Fish and Wildlife Biogeographic Data Branch.

California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). Rarefind Version 5. March 2022. Rarefind query of the USGS 7.5-minute quads nine-quad review area Malaga, Sanger, Clovis, Round Mountain, Friant, Academy, Fresno South, Lanes Bridge, and Fresno North and GIS query of occurrences within a 5-mile buffer (project vicinity).

City of Clovis. 2014. General Plan City of Clovis, Goal 2. Adopted August 25, 2014. ______. 2021. Clovis Municipal Code. Adopted December 6, 2021.

eBird. 2022. eBird: An online database of bird distribution and abundance. eBird, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. Available: http://www.ebird.org. Accessed: May 2, 2022.

Google Earth. 2022. Aerial images of the project site and environs from September 1998, May 2002, July 2002, December 2002, August 2003, August 2004, December 2005, August 2006, November 2006, June 2009, September 2009, April 2011, August 2012, March 2013, April 2014, November 2014, March 2015, April 2017, August 2017, February 2018, August 2018, August 2019, September 2019, May 2020, April 2021, June 2021, and August 2021.

Fresno County General Plan. 2000. Fresno County General Plan 2000, Chapter Three- Conservation/Open Space Element. Last updated: August 2016.

Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2022. Web Soil Survey. Available at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. 287
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» 14 Sawyer, J., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evans. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation. 2nd edition.

California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, California: California Native Plant Society. 1,300 pp.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022a. Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS).

Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) Trust Resources Report. May 2022.

Available at: http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/.
______. 2022b. USFWS Critical Habitat Polygons. Available at: http://ecos.fws.gov/crithab/. May 2022.
______. 2022c. USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), Online Mapper Tool. Available at:
https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html

288
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» A-1

APPENDIX A

FIGURES
289
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:(c) 2014 Esri
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic
Society, i-cubed
SOURCE: USGS 7.5' Quad - Clovis (1981), Round Mountain (1978), CA I:\HPT2201\GIS\MXD\ProjLoc_USGS.mxd (4/25/2022)
FIGURE 1
DeWolf Apartments Project
Project Location and Vicinity
0 1000 2000
FEET
LEGEND
Project Location
Madera
County
Fresno
County
ÃÃ168
ÃÃ180
ÃÃ41
ÃÃ99
Project
Location
Project Vicinity
290
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Service Layer Credits:

BUCKINGHAM
AVE

GRAYBARK AVE

BELLAIRE AVE

ASHLAN AVE

BUCKINGHAM AVE

HAMPTON WAY

BUCKINGHAM AVE

WHITEASHAVE

BELLAIRE AVE

MARENGO
AVE

BLACKWOOD AVE

MARENGO AVE

RICHERT AVE

SWIFT AVE

GRAYBARK AVE

WHITEASH AVE

CARMELITA AVE

DE WOLF AVE

E ASHLAN AVE
SOURCE: Nearmap (2/24/2022)
R:\HPT2201\GIS\MXD\Bio\ProjectArea.mxd (5/6/2022)
FIGURE 2
DeWolf Apartments Project
Project Area
0 125 250
FEET
LEGEND
Project Site
291
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Service Layer Credits:

BUCKINGHAM
AVE

DE WOLF AVE

E ASHLAN AVE
SOURCE: Nearmap (2/24/2022)
R:\HPT2201\GIS\MXD\Bio\Vegetation.mxd (5/6/2022)
FIGURE 3
DeWolf Apartments Project
Vegetation and Land Cover
LEGEND
Project Site
Vegetation and Land Cover
Ruderal
Residential Development0 37.5 75
FEET
292
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Service Layer Credits:

BUCKINGHAM
AVE

DE WOLF AVE

E ASHLAN AVE
SOURCE: Nearmap (2/24/2022)
R:\HPT2201\GIS\MXD\Bio\Soils.mxd (5/6/2022)
FIGURE 4
DeWolf Apartments Project
Soils
LEGEND
Project Site
Soil Type
ScA- San Joaquin Sandy Loam
0 37.5 75
FEET
293
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA
\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» B-1

APPENDIX B
SITE
PLAN
294
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

LSA
SCALE: NOTTO SCALE
SOURCE: R Haus Design Studio, May 2022
I :\HPT2201 \GIS\fig2_Siteplan.ai (07/12/2022)
X
0G +299 67 OG+299.51
X
FL+299.33
oo +299 79X NO PRKG SIGN 9 14
FL+29943 FL+29928 +29970 FL+29920 FL+299

BIKE LANE
l'L -- ---- ----------------------------l'L ------- ---- - 00+300.13 OG +300.06

PROPOSED SITE
FIGURE 5
De Wolf Apartments Project
Conceptual Site Plan 295
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» B-2

APPENDIX C

REPRESENTATIVE SITE PHOTOS

296
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

APPENDIX C
DeWolf Avenue Apartments Project
Representative Site Photographs
View of the developed area and ornamental landscaping associated with the development, facing north. May 5, 2022
View of the ruderal vegetation, facing northwest. May 5, 2022

Page 1 of 4 ends

297
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

APPENDIX C
Representative Site Photographs
View of the ruderal vegetation, facing west. May 5, 2022 View of the ruderal vegetation, facing south. May 5, 2022

Page 2 of 4 ends

DeWolf Avenue Apartments Project
298
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

APPENDIX C
View of the ornamental landscaping and ruderal vegetation, facing east. May 5, 2022
View of the ruderal vegetation, facing north. May 5, 2022

Page 3 of 4 ends

DeWolf Avenue Apartments Project
Representative Site Photographs
299
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

APPENDIX
View of developed area and ornamental landscaping, facing northeast. May 5, 2022 View of ruderal vegetation, facing west. May 5, 2022

Page 4 of 4 ends

DeWolf Avenue Apartments Project
Representative Site Photographs
300
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» B-3

APPENDIX D

VASCULAR SPECIES OBSERVED

301
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» B-4 Plant Species Observed
The table below contains a list of plant species identified on the project site by LSA Biologist Kelly McDonald on May 5, 2022.
* Introduced species not native to California

EUDICOTS
Amaranthaceae Amaranth Family
Amaranthus albus* Tumbleweed
Asteraceae Sunflower Family
Erigeron canadensis Canadian horsweed
Erigeron bonariensis* Flax-leaved horsweed
Pseudognaphalium luteoalbum* Jersey cudweed
Sonchus oleraceus* Common sow thistle
Brassicaceae Mustard Family
Capsella bursa-pastoris* Shepherd’s purse
Caprifoliaceae Honeysuckle Family
Lonicera sp.* Honeysuckle
Caryophyllaceae Pink Family
Polycarpon tetraphyllum* Four leaved all seed
Chenopodiaceae Goosefoot Family
Salsola tragus* Russian thistle
Cupressaceae Redwood family
Sequoia sempervirens Coast redwood
Euphorbiaceae Spurge family
Croton setiger Doveweed
Euphorbia maculate* Spotted spurge
Geraniaceae Geranium Family
Erodium cicutarium* Redstem stork's bill
Fagaceae Oaks Family
Quercus lobata Valley oak
Malvaceae Mallow Family
Malva parviflora* Cheeseweed mallow
Moraceae Fig Family
Ficus carica* Common fig
Oleaceae Olive Family
Ligustrum lucidum* Glossy privet
Plantaginaceae Plantain Family
Plantago lanceolata* English plantain
Portulacaceae Purslane Family
Portulaca oleracea* Common purslane
Pinaceae Pine Family
Pinus sp.* Pine
Pittosporaceae Pittosporum Family
Pittosporum tobira* Japanese cheesewood
Rutaceae Rue Family
Citrus sp.* Orange
Solanaceae Nightshade family
Datura wrightii* Jimsonweed
Simaroubaceae Quassi Family
302
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» B-5 Ailanthus altissima* Tree of Heaven
Verbenaceae Vervain family
Lantana montevidensis* Trailing lantana
Zygophyllaceae Caltrop Family
Tribulus terrestris* Puncture vine

MONOCOTS
Myrtaceae Myrtle family
Eucalyptus camaldulensis* Red gum
Poaceae Grass Family
Bromus catharticus* Rescue grass
Bromus hordeaceus* Soft chess
Cynodon dactylon* Bermuda grass
Festuca bromoides* Brome fescue
Hordeum murinum* Foxtail barley
Melica californica California melicgrass
Poa annua* Annual blue grass
Poa secunda Nevada blue grass
303
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» D-1

APPENDIX E

SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES IDENTIFIED AS POTENTIALLY OCCURING IN THE

PROJECT VICINITY

304
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» D-1 Table B: Special-Status Plant Species Potentially Occurring in the Project Vicinity Common
Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Description Flowering Period Likelihood of Occurrence and Rationale
Hoover's
calycadenia
Calycadenia hooveri US: –
CA: –
CNPS: 1B.3
Annual herb occurring in cismontane
woodland and valley/foothill grassland
between 215 and 985 m in elevation. Found
in Calaveras, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, San
Joaquin, and Stanislaus counties.

July-
September
Not Expected. There are no known historical records
of occurrence in the project vicinity and suitable
habitat is absent from the project site.

Bristly sedge Carex comosa US: –
CA: –
CNPS: 2B.1
Perennial rhizomatous herb occurring in
coastal prairie, marshes and swamps (lake
margins) and valley/foothill grassland
between 0 and 625 m in elevation. Found in
Central Valley Counties.

May-
September
Not Expected. There are no known historical records
of occurrence in the project vicinity and suitable
habitat is absent from the project site.

Succulent
owl's-clover
Castilleja campestris
var.
succulenta
US: FT
CA: CE
CNPS: 1B.2
Annual herb (hemiparasitic) occurring in
vernal pools between 50 and 750 m in
elevation. Found in Central Valley counites.

April- May Not Expected. There is one historical record of occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB 1991) and
suitable habitat is absent from the project site.

California
jewelflower
Caulanthus
californicus
US: FE
CA: CE
CNPS: 1B.1
Annual herb occurring in chenopod scrub,
pinyon and juniper woodland, and
valley/foothill grassland in sandy soils
between 61 and 1,000 m in elevation. Found
in Central Coast and Central Valley counties.

February-
May
Not Expected. There is one historical record of
occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB 1986) and
suitable habitat is absent from the project site.

Dwarf
downingia
Downingia pusilla US: –
CA: –
CNPS: 2B.2
Annual herb occurring in vernal pools and
mesic valley/foothill grassland between 1 and
445 m in elevation. Found in Central Valley
and Northern California counites.

March-May Not Expected. There are no known historical records of occurrence in the project vicinity and suitable
habitat is absent from the project site.

Spiny-sepaled
button-celery
Eryngium
spinosepalum
US: –
CA: –
CNPS: 1B.2

Annual/perennial herb occurring
in vernal pools and valley/foothill grassland
between 80 and 975 m in elevation. Found in
Central Coast and Central Valley counties.

April-June Not Expected. There is one historical record of occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB 1936) and
suitable habitat is absent from the project site.
305
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» D-2 Table B: Special-Status Plant Species Potentially Occurring in the Project Vicinity Common
Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Description Flowering Period Likelihood of Occurrence and Rationale
California
satintail
California satintail US: –
CA: –
CNPS: 2B.1
Perennial rhizomatous herb occurring in
chaparral, coastal scrub, Mojavean desert
scrub, meadows/seeps, and riparian scrub
between 0 and 1,215 m in elevation. Found in
Central Valley and Southern California
counties.

September-
May
Not Expected. There is one historical record of
occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB 1893) and
suitable habitat is absent from the project site.

Forked hare-leaf Lagophylla
dichotoma
US: –
CA: –
CNPS: 1B.1
Annual herb occurring in cismontane
woodland and valley/foothill grassland
between 45 and 335 m in elevation. Found in
Merced, Fresno, Calaveras, and Stanislaus
counites.

April- May Not Expected. There are no known historical records of occurrence in the project vicinity and suitable
habitat is absent from the project site.

Madera
leptosiphon
Leptosiphon
serrulatus
US: –
CA: –
CNPS: 1B.2
Annual herb occurring in cismontane
woodland and lower montane coniferous
forest between 300 and 1,300 m in elevation.

Found in Fresno, Kern, Madera, Mariposa,
and Tulare counites.

April-May Not Expected. There is one historical record of occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB 1922) and
suitable habitat is absent from the project site.

Pincushion
navarretia
Navarretia myersii
ssp.
myersii
US: –
CA: –
CNPS: 1B.1
Annual herb occurring in vernal pools
between 20 and 330 m in elevation. Found in
Amador, Calaveras, Madera, Merced, Placer,
and Sacramento counties.

April- May Not Expected. There are no known historical records of occurrence in the project vicinity and suitable
habitat is absent from the project site.

San Joaquin
Valley Orcutt
grass
Orcuttia inaequalis US: FT
CA: CE
CNPS: 1B.1
Annual herb occurring in vernal pools
between 10 and 755 m in elevation. Found in
Fresno, Madera, Merced, Solano, Stanislaus,
and Tulare counites.

April-
September
Not Expected. There are no known historical records
of occurrence in the project vicinity and suitable
habitat is absent from the project site.

Hairy Orcutt
grass
Orcuttia pilosa US: FE
CA: CE
CNPS: 1B.1
Annual herb occurring in vernal pools
between 46 and 200 m in elevation. Found in
Glenn, Madera, Merced, Stanislaus, and
Tehama counites.

May-
September
Not Expected. There are no known historical records
of occurrence in the project vicinity and suitable
habitat is absent from the project site.

Hartweg's
golden sunburst
Pseudobahia
bahiifolia
US: FE
CA: CE
CNPS: 1B.1
Annual herb occurring in cismontane
woodland and valley/foothill grassland
between 15 and 150 m in elevation.

March-April Not Expected. There are no known historical records of occurrence in the project vicinity and suitable
habitat is absent from the project site.
306
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» D-3 Table B: Special-Status Plant Species Potentially Occurring in the Project Vicinity Common
Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Description Flowering Period Likelihood of Occurrence and Rationale
San Joaquin
adobe sunburst
Pseudobahia
peirsonii
US: FT
CA: CE
CNPS: 1B.1
Annual herb occurring in cismontane
woodland and valley/foothill grassland in
adobe clay between 90 and 800 m in
elevation. Found in Fresno, Kern, and Tulare
counties.

February-
April
Not Expected. There is one record of occurrence in
the project vicinity (CNDDB 2010) and suitable habitat
is absent from the project site.

Sanford's
arrowhead
Sagittaria sanfordii US: –
CA: –
CNPS: 1B.2
Perennial rhizomatous herb (emergent)
occurring in marshes and swamps within
shallow freshwater between 0 and 650 m in
elevation. Found throughout California
counites.

May-
October
Not Expected. There is one historical record of
occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB 1986) and
suitable habitat is absent from the project site.

Greene's
tuctoria
Tuctoria greenei US: FT
CA: CR
CNPS: 1B.1
Annual herb occurring in vernal pools
between 30 and 1,070 m in elevation. Found
in Central Valley counties.

May-July Not Expected. There is one historical record of occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB 1937) and
suitable habitat is absent from the project site.
1Project vicinity = Project site plus a 5 mile buffer
Status: Federal Endangered (FE), Federal Threatened (FT), Federal Candidate (FC), Federal Proposed (FP, FPE, FPT), Federal De listed (FD), California Endangered (CE), California Threatened (CT), California Species of Special Concern (SSC), California Fully Protected Species (CFP), California Special Plant (CSP), California Special Animal (CSA), California Rare (CR)

California Native Plant Society Designations:
1B = Rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere 2B = Rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but not elsewhere and ,

0.1 = seriously endangered

0.2 = fairly endangered

CA = California
CNPS = California Native Plant Society
ft = foot/feet
m = meter/meters
mi = mile/miles
US = United States

307
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» D-4 Table B: Special-Status Animal Species Potentially Occurring or Known to Occur in the Project Vicinity Common Name Scientific Name Status Listing Habitat and Comments Likelihood of Occurrence and Rationale

CRUSTACEANS
Vernal pool fairy
shrimp
Branchinecta lynchi US: FT
CA: –

Endemic to the grasslands of the Central Valley, Central Coast mountains, and South Coast mountains, in astatic rain-filled pools. Inhabit small, clear-water sandstone-depression pools and grassed swale, earth slump, or basalt-flow depression pools.

Not Expected. There are four records of
occurrence in the project vicinity 1 (CNDDB
1993, 2006, 2008,2009) and suitable habitat is
absent from the project site.

Vernal pool tadpole
shrimp
Branchinecta
mesovallensis
US: –
CA: SA

Vernal pools in the Central Valley. Not Expected. There are three records of occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB
2007) and suitable habitat is absent from the
project site.

California linderiella Linderiella
occidentalis
US: –
CA: SA

Seasonal pools in unplowed grasslands with old alluvial soils underlain by hardpan or in sandstone depressions. Water in the pools has very low alkalinity, conductivity, and total dissolved solids.

Not Expected. There are two records of
occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB
1994) and suitable habitat is absent from the
project site.

INSECTS
Crotch bumble bee Bombus crotchii US: –
CA: SA

Coastal California east to the Sierra-Cascade crest and south into Mexico. Food plant genera include Antirrhinum, Phacelia, Clarkia, Dendromecon, Eschscholzia, and Eriogonum.

Not Expected. There is one known historical
record of occurrence in the project vicinity
(CNDDB 1899) and suitable habitat is absent
from the project site. No typical food genera
was observed during the May 2022 field
survey.

Valley elderberry
longhorn beetle
Desmocerus
californicus
dimorphus
US: FT
CA: –
Occurs only in the Central Valley of California, in association with blue elderberry (Sambucus mexicana). Prefers to lay eggs in elderberries 2-8 inches in diameter; some preference shown for "stressed" elderberries.

Not Expected. There are no known historical
records of occurrence in the project vicinity
and suitable habitat is absent from the project
site.

Antioch efferian
robberfly
Efferia antiochi US: –
CA: SA

Known only from Contra Costa and Fresno counties. Not Expected. There is one known historical record of occurrence in the project vicinity
(CNDDB 1954) and suitable habitat is absent
from the project site.

Molestan blister
beetle
Lytta molesta US: –
CA: SA

Inhabits the Central Valley of California, from Contra Costa to Kern and Tulare counties.

Not Expected. There is one known historical
record of occurrence in the project vicinity
(CNDDB 19XX) and suitable habitat is absent
from the project site.

Hurd's metapogon
robberfly
Metapogon hurdi US: –
CA: SA

Known only from Antioch Dunes and Fresno. Not Expected. There is one known historical record of occurrence in the project vicinity
(CNDDB 1922) and suitable habitat is absent
from the project site.

AMPHIBIANS
308
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» D-5 Table B: Special-Status Animal Species Potentially Occurring or Known to Occur in the Project Vicinity Common Name Scientific Name Status Listing Habitat and Comments Likelihood of Occurrence and Rationale California tiger
salamander - central
California DPS
Ambystoma
californiense pop. 1
US: FT
CA: CT

Lives in vacant or mammal-occupied burrows throughout most of the year; in grassland, savanna, or open woodland habitats.

Need underground refuges, especially ground squirrel burrows, and vernal pools or other seasonal water sources for breeding.

Not Expected. There are three records of
occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB 1936,
1974, 2017) and suitable habitat is absent from
the project site.

Western spadefoot Spea hammondii US: –
CA: SSC

Occurs primarily in grassland and other relatively open habitats.

Found in elevations ranging from sea level to 4,500 ft. Requires temporary pools for breeding.

Not Expected. There is one record of
occurrence in the project vicinity (CNNDB
2008) and suitable habitat is absent from the
project site.

REPTILES
Northern California
legless lizard
Anniella pulchra US: –
CA: SSC

Sandy or loose loamy soils under sparse vegetation. Soil moisture is essential. They prefer soils with a high moisture content.

Not Expected. There is one known historical
record of occurrence in the project vicinity
(CNDDB 18XX) and suitable habitat is absent
from the project site.

California glossy
snake
Arizona elegans
occidentalis
US: –
CA: SSC

Patchily distributed from the eastern portion of San Francisco Bay, southern San Joaquin Valley, and the Coast, Transverse, and Peninsular ranges, south to Baja California. Generalist reported from a range of scrub and grassland habitats, often with loose or sandy soils.

Not Expected. There is one known historical
record of occurrence in the project vicinity
(CNDDB 1893) and suitable habitat is absent
from the project site.

Western pond turtle Emys marmorata US: –
CA: SSC

A thoroughly aquatic turtle of ponds, marshes, rivers, streams and irrigation ditches, usually with aquatic vegetation, below 6000 ft elevation. Needs basking sites and suitable (sandy banks or grassy open fields) upland habitat up to 0.5 km from water for egg-laying.

Not Expected. There is one record of
occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB 2016)
and suitable habitat is absent from the project
site.

Coast horned lizard Phrynosoma
blainvillii
US: –
CA: SSC
Frequents a wide variety of habitats, most common in lowlands along sandy washes with scattered low bushes. Open areas for sunning, bushes for cover, patches of loose soil for burial and abundant supply of ants and other insects.

Not Expected. There is one known historical
record of occurrence in the project vicinity
(CNDDB 1893) and suitable habitat is absent
from the project site.

BIRDS
Tricolored blackbird Agelaius tricolor US: –
CA: SSC

Highly colonial species, most numerous in Central Valley and vicinity. Largely endemic to California. Requires open water, protected nesting substrate, and foraging area with insect prey within a few km of the colony.

Not Expected. There is one record of
occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB 1994)
and suitable habitat is absent from the project
site.

Burrowing owl Athene cunicularia US: –
CA: SSC

Burrows in open, dry, annual or perennial grasslands, deserts, and scrublands characterized by low-growing vegetation.

Subterranean nester, dependent upon burrowing mammals,
most notably the California ground squirrel.

Low probability of occurrence. There are two
records of occurrence in the project vicinity
(CNDDB 1990) and several eBird records with
the most recent from March 2021. However,
the ruderal vegetation provides marginal
suitable habitat and several gopher burrows
309
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , F RESNO C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA

\\AzCorp04\FREprojects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments «08/22/22» D-6 Table B: Special-Status Animal Species Potentially Occurring or Known to Occur in the Project Vicinity Common Name Scientific Name Status Listing Habitat and Comments Likelihood of Occurrence and Rationale were observed. The gopher burrows could
provide suitable burrowing habitat.

Swainson’s hawk Buteo swainsoni US: –
CA: CT

Breeds in grasslands with scattered trees, juniper-sage flats, riparian areas, savannas, and agricultural/ranch lands. Requires adjacent suitable foraging areas such as grasslands, alfalfa, or grain fields supporting rodent populations.

Moderate probability of foraging; moderate
probability of nesting. There is one record of
occurrence in the project vicinity (CNDDB
1956). There are several eBird records with the
most recent from April 2022. The project site
does contain trees and shrubs that provide
marginal suitable nesting habitat. The
surrounding areas on the project site could also
provide suitable foraging habitat.

Western yellow-billed
cuckoo
Coccyzus americanus
occidentalis
US: FT
CA: CE
Riparian forest nester, along the broad, lower flood-bottoms of larger river systems. Nests in riparian jungles of willow, often mixed with cottonwoods, with lower story of blackberry, nettles, or wild grape.

Not Expected. There are two historical records
of occurrence in project vicinity (CNDDB 1898,
1902) and suitable habitat is absent.

Least Bell's vireo Vireo bellii pusillus US: FE
CA: CE
Summer resident of Southern California in low riparian in vicinity of water or in dry river bottoms; below 2000 ft. Nests placed along margins of bushes or on twigs projecting into pathways, usually willow, Baccharis, mesquite.

Not Expected. There are two historical records
of occurrence in project vicinity (CNDDB 1906,
1912) and suitable habitat is absent.

MAMMALS
American badger Taxidea taxus US: –
CA: SSC

Most abundant in drier open stages of most shrub, forest, and herbaceous habitats, with friable soils. Needs sufficient food, friable soils and open, uncultivated ground. Preys on burrowing rodents. Digs burrows.

Not Expected. There is one record of
occurrence in project vicinity (CNDDB 1987)
and suitable habitat is absent.

San Joaquin kit fox Vulpes macrotis
mutica
US: FE
CA: CT

Prefers open, level areas with loose-textured soils supporting scattered, shrubby vegetation with little human disturbance.

Some agricultural areas may support these foxes.

Not Expected. There are no known historical
records of occurrence in the project vicinity
and suitable habitat is absent from the project
site.
1Project vicinity = Project area plus a 5 mile buffer
Status: Federal Endangered (FE), Federal Threatened (FT), Federal Candidate (FC), Federal Proposed (FP, FPE, FPT), Federal Delisted (FD), California Endangered (CE), California Threatened (CT), California Species of Special Concern (SSC), California Fully Protected Species (CFP), California Special Animal (CSA)

CA = California ft = foot/feet
m = meter/meters
mi = mile/miles
US = United States

310
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

CARLSBAD
CLOVIS
IRVINE

LOS ANGELES

PALM SPRINGS

POINT RICHMOND

RIVERSIDE

ROSEVILLE

SAN LUIS OBISPO
A
ugust 22, 2022
Peter Sumal
3008 North Vahe Avenue
Fresno, CA 93737
Subject: Archaeological Resources Survey Assessment for the DeWolf Apartments Project in Fresno County, California (LSA Project HPT2201)
Dear Mr. Sumal:

LSA conducted an archaeological resources survey assessment (study) for the proposed DeWolf Apartments Project (project) in Clovis, Fresno County, California. The project site is currently developed with one single-family residential home with areas of vegetation, and the proposed project would involve demolition of the existing home and construction of 26 multifamily apartment units. Study work was completed per the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA).

This study has the following purposes: (1) identify archaeological deposits that may meet the CEQA definition of a historical resource (California Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21084.1) or a unique archaeological resource (PRC Section 21083.2) and that may be impacted by the proposed project; (2) assess the potential for human remains; and (3) recommend procedures for avoiding or mitigating impacts to such deposits, if warranted. The study consisted of background research and a field survey and was conducted by LSA Associate/Senior Cultural Resources Manager Kerrie Collison, M.A., Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) 28731436.

PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS
The 1.62-acre project site, which is also the study site, is depicted on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Clovis, California 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map in Section 14 of Township 13 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Baseline and Meridian (USGS 1981; Figure 1 [all figures provided in Attachment B). It is within Assessor’s Parcel Number 555-042-70, on the northwest corner of the intersection of DeWolf Avenue and Ashlan Avenue (Figure 2).

The project site is flat and is at an elevation of approximately 375 feet. The nearest freshwater source would have been Dog Creek, which is 0.5 mile east of the project site. Soil surveys (USDA n.d.) indicate that the project site consists of San Joaquin sandy loam sediments, which are terraces and fan remnants derived from granite that typically consist of sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and clay 19 to 25 inches below the surface, with duripan (a cemented hardpan) below. Surficial sediments of the project site overlay geologic deposits, specifically older alluvium, lake, playa, and terrace deposits that date to the Pleistocene (2.58 million to 11,700 years ago) (CGS 2015). 285 South Street, Suite P, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805.782.0745 www.lsa.net Appendix C
311
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

8/22/22 «\\lsaazfiles.file.core.windows.net\projects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments\PRODUCTS\DeWolf Apartments Archaeo Report.docx» 2 BACKGROUND RESEARCH
Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center
A record search of the project site and a 0.5-mile search radius was conducted on May 10, 2022, by Jeremy E. David, Assistant Coordinator at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (SSJVIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System at California State University, Bakersfield (SSJVIC Records Search File No. 22-182). The SSJVIC, an affiliate of the California Office of Historic Preservation, is the official repository of cultural resources records and reports for Fresno County. The record search results (Attachment C) indicate that one previous cultural resources study (a survey) has included a portion of the project site. Eleven previous cultural resources studies have included a portion of the 0.5-mile radius of the project site; all of these studies have been field surveys. More than 90 percent of the search radius has been studied for cultural resources. As a result of previous cultural resources studies, no cultural resources have been recorded within the project site or the 0.5-mile radius.

Native American Heritage Commission
On April 26, 2022, LSA submitted a request to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to request a review of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) for the presence of Native American cultural resources that might be impacted by the proposed project. The NAHC maintains the SLF database and is the official State repository of Native American sacred-site location records in California.

NAHC Cultural Resources Analyst Cameron Vela responded on June 22, 2022, stating that the results of the SLF search were negative (Attachment D). The NAHC also provided a suggested list of Native American individuals to contact for information regarding the project site.

Aerial Photographs and Maps
Aerial photographs and historic maps that include the project site were also reviewed (USGS n.d.; NETR n.d.). The results of the review are presented in Table A.

Table A: Aerial Photograph and Historic Map Review
Map/Photograph Results
1923 Clovis, California
map (Scale 1:31,680)
No buildings or developments are depicted on the project site. Roads are delineated in the vicinity of the project site. Dog Creek is depicted 0.5 mile east of the project site. 1946 Clovis, California
map (Scale 1:62,500)
No changes from the 1923 map.
1962 aerial photograph The project site is an agricultural field with no buildings. 1964 Clovis, California
map (Scale 1:24,000)
No changes in the project site from the 1923 map.
1972 aerial photograph A house is depicted in the eastern portion of the project site. 1984 aerial photograph A swimming pool has been added to the project site. No other changes observed. 1998 aerial photograph No changes in the project site from the 1984 aerial photograph.

Sources: United States Geological Survey (n.d.) and National Environmental Title Research (n.d.).

312
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

8/22/22 «\\lsaazfiles.file.core.windows.net\projects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments\PRODUCTS\DeWolf Apartments Archaeo Report.docx» 3 FIELD SURVEY
On May 25, 2022, LSA archaeologist Kerrie Collison conducted a pedestrian field survey of the entire project site. Approximately 50 percent of the project site is developed as either a residential building and backyard with swimming pool or maintained landscaping. Unpaved and undeveloped areas of the project site were intensively surveyed to examine the project site for any indications of archaeological deposits and/or human remains. The undeveloped, western portion of the project site had 50 percent ground visibility, with sparse, ankle-high vegetation (see Photo 1, below).

Photo 1: Undeveloped portion of project site. View north.

The field survey did not identify any archaeological cultural resources in the project site. Observed sediments throughout the project site were either a light-brown or medium-brown fine-grained (but compacted) material.

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This study, consisting of background research and a field survey, did not identify archaeological deposits or human remains in the project site. Prior to its partial development for residential purposes, the project site was used for agricultural purposes. Agricultural use of the project site would have disturbed surficial and near-surficial sediments that may have contained prehistoric archaeological resources and later grading for residential development of the eastern portion of the project site would have disturbed the same sediments. While Dog Creek (which would have been a freshwater water source for prehistoric and historic-period populations) is 0.5 mile from the project site, the mapped geologic deposits that underlay the surficial sediments of the project site date to 313
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

8/22/22 «\\lsaazfiles.file.core.windows.net\projects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments\PRODUCTS\DeWolf Apartments Archaeo Report.docx» 4 the Pleistocene, a time that does not include human occupation of the region. At least half of the project site has undergone surficial ground disturbance associated with residential development and the other portion of the project site was subject to decades of agricultural disturbance. Given that agricultural discing activities can disturb sediments to a depth of approximately 18 inches below the surface and mapped sediments of the project site indicate that duripan begins at approximately 25 inches below the surface, there is a low likelihood that subsurface archaeological deposits exist within the project site.

Given the above factors, the potential for the project to impact intact and significant cultural resources is low, and no further cultural studies are recommended for this project. LSA recommends that, in the event that archaeological resources are identified during project activities, work should be halted immediately within 50 feet of the find until a qualified professional archaeologist is contacted to assess the nature and significance of the find and determine if any additional study or treatment of the find is warranted. The archaeologist should develop proper mitigation measures required for the discovery per California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15064.5(f).

Additional studies could include, but would not be limited to, collection and documentation of artifacts, documentation of the cultural resources on State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Series 523 forms, or subsurface testing. If determined appropriate by the qualified archaeologist, archaeological monitoring should commence and continue until grading and excavation are complete or until the monitoring archaeologist determines, based on field observations and in consultation with the qualified archaeologist, that there is little likelihood of encountering additional archaeological cultural resources. Archaeological monitoring may be reduced from full-time to part-time or spot-checking if determined appropriate by the qualified archaeologist based on monitoring results. Upon completion of any monitoring activities, the archaeologist should prepare a report to document the methods and results of monitoring activities.

The final version of this report should be submitted to the SSJVIC.

In the event that human remains are encountered at any time during project work, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Fresno County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to State PRC Section 5097.98.

The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner would notify the NAHC within 24 hours, which would determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection and make recommendations or preferences for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The MLD’s recommendations may include scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials, preservation of Native American human remains and associated items in place, relinquishment of Native American human remains and associated items to the descendants for treatment, or any other culturally appropriate treatment.
314
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

8/22/22 «\\lsaazfiles.file.core.windows.net\projects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments\PRODUCTS\DeWolf Apartments Archaeo Report.docx» 5 Please contact me at [email protected] if you have any questions regarding this study. Thank you for using the services of LSA.

Sincerely,
LSA Associates, Inc.

Kerrie Collison, M.A., RPA 28731436
Associate/Senior Cultural Resources Manager

Attachments: A—References
B—Project Figures
C—Records Search Results
D—Native American Heritage Commission Response
315
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

A RCHAEOLOGICAL R ESOURCES S URVEY A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , C ALIFORNIA

\\lsaazfiles.file.core.windows.net\projects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments\PRODUCTS\DeWolf Apartments Archaeo Report.docx «08/22/22» A-1

ATTACHMENT A

REFERENCES
California Geological Survey (CGS)
2015 Geologic Map of California. Website: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/gmc/ (accessed July 13, 2022).

National Environmental Title Research (NETR)
n.d. Historic Aerials. Website: http://www.historicaerials.com (accessed July 13, 2022).

United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA) n.d. Web Soil Survey. Website: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx (accessed July 13, 2022).

United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1981 Clovis, California 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle. Published 1964. Photorevised 1981.

USGS, Denver, Colorado.
n.d. USGS topoView. Website: https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#4/39.98/-100.02 (accessed July 13, 2022).
316
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

A RCHAEOLOGICAL R ESOURCES S URVEY A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , C ALIFORNIA

\\lsaazfiles.file.core.windows.net\projects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments\PRODUCTS\DeWolf Apartments Archaeo Report.docx «08/22/22»

ATTACHMENT B

PROJECT FIGURES

317
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Service Layer Credits:

BUCKINGHAM
AVE

GRAYBARK AVE

BELLAIRE AVE

ASHLAN AVE

BUCKINGHAM AVE

HAMPTON WAY

BUCKINGHAM AVE

WHITEASHAVE

BELLAIRE AVE

MARENGO
AVE

BLACKWOOD AVE

MARENGO AVE

RICHERT AVE

SWIFT AVE

GRAYBARK AVE

WHITEASH AVE

CARMELITA AVE

DE WOLF AVE

E ASHLAN AVE
SOURCE: Nearmap (2/24/2022)
I:\HPT2201\GIS\MXD\ProjectArea.mxd (4/25/2022)
FIGURE 2
DeWolf Apartments Project
Project Area
0 125 250
FEET
LEGEND
Project Location
319
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

A RCHAEOLOGICAL R ESOURCES S URVEY A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , C ALIFORNIA

\\lsaazfiles.file.core.windows.net\projects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments\PRODUCTS\DeWolf Apartments Archaeo Report.docx «08/22/22»

ATTACHMENT C

RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS

320
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

5/10/2022

Kerrie Collison
LSA
285 South Street, Suite P
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

Re: DeWolf Apartments Project (HPT2201, Phase 03)
Records Search File No.: 22-182

The Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center received your record search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Clovis USGS 7.5’ quads. The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and the 0.5 mile radius:

As indicated on the data request form, the locations of resources and reports are provided in the following format: ☒ custom GIS maps ☐ GIS data

Resources within project area: None
Resources within 0.5 mile radius: None
Reports within project area: FR-01797
Reports within 0.5 mile radius: FR-00118, 00297, 0112, 0114, 01619, 02042, 02043, 02099, 02356, 02577, 03012
Note: 3 Non-Arch resources were omitted from all results, as per request.

Resource Database Printout (list): ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Resource Database Printout (details): ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Resource Digital Database Records: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (list): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (details): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Digital Database Records: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Record Copies: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed ☐ not available Report Copies: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed ☐ not available Note: Only the Title Page, Table of Contents, & Executive Summary of TU-00102 was included.

OHP Built Environment Resources Directory: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed CA Inventory of Historic Resources (1976): ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Note: P-15-007046 is not listed in the BERD. The 2013 HPD page was included for this resource. 321
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Caltrans Bridge Survey: Not available at SSJVIC; please see https://dot.ca.gov/programs/environmental-analysis/cultural-studies/california-historical-bridges-tunnels Ethnographic Information: Not available at SSJVIC
Historical Literature: Not available at SSJVIC
Historical Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/
Local Inventories: Not available at SSJVIC
GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx#searchTabIndex=0&searchByTypeIndex=1 and/or http://www.oac.cdlib.org/view?docId=hb8489p15p;developer=local;style=oac4;doc.view=items Shipwreck Inventory: Not available at SSJVIC; please see https://www.slc.ca.gov/shipwrecks/

Soil Survey Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx

Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as s oon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above.

The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of , or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and R ecreation, S tate Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission.

Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submi tted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.

Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. I nvoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.

Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS).

Sincerely,

Jeremy E David
Assistant Coordinator
322
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
&M
FR-01797
FR-00297
FR-02356
FR-00118
FR-01619
FR-01114
FR-02042
FR-01112
FR-02577
FR-03012
FR-03012
FR-02099
FR-02043
May depict confidential cultural resource locations.

Do not distribute.

Ü
0 0.1 0.20.05 Miles
0 0.15 0.30.075 Kilometers
SSJV Information Center Record Search 22-182
Requester: Kerrie Collison, LSA
Project Name: DeWolf Apartments Project (HPT2201, Phase 03) USGS 7.5' Quad(s): Clovis
County: Fresno
Project Area
Record Search radius
323
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Report List
Report No. Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s) ResourcesOther IDs SSJVIC Record Search 22-182
FR-00118 1991 Cultural Resources Survey for Rural
Residential Development of Tract #4249 in
Fresno County
Michael Paoli and
Associates
Bissonnette, Linda DickNADB-R - 1141390
FR-00297 1993 Cultural Resources Assessment Clovis
Unified School District Southeast Educational
Center Ashlan and De Wolf Avenues, Fresno
County
Cultural Resources
Consulting
Bissonnette, Linda Dick
FR-01112 1995 Addendum to Cultural Resources
Assessment Clovis Unified School Distirct
Southeast Education Center Ashlan and De
Wolf Avenues, Fresno County
Individual ConsultantWren, Donald G.NADB-R - 1140732
FR-01114 1995 An Archaeological Survey of a Proposed
Ponding Basin, Locan Avnue, Fresno County,
California
Individual ConsultantWren, Donald G.

FR-01619 1999 Dog Creek Cultural/Historical Resource
Report
Individual ConsultantWren, Donald G.

FR-01797 2002 A Cultural Resource Study for the Clovis
Southeast Specific Plan, Clovis, California
Individual ConsultantWren, Donald G. 10-004757, 10-004758, 10-004759, 10-004760, 10-004761, 10-004779,
10-004780, 10-004781, 10-004782,
10-004783
FR-02042 2004 A Cultural Resource Study of the Ashland- Leonard Property, Fresno County, California
Varner AssociatesVarner, Dudley M.

FR-02043 2004 Proposed Cellular Tower Project in Fresno County, California (Temperance/CA-1753D)
EarthTouch, Inc.Billat, LornaSubmitter -
Temperance/CA-
1753D
FR-02099 2005 Records Search Results and Site Visit for Cricket Telecommunications Facility
Candidate FAT-034A (Ashlan/DeWolf), 7715
East Ashlan, Clovis, Fresno County, California
Michael Brandman
Associates
Bonner, Wayne H.

FR-02356 2010 Cultural Resource Study for a Two Creeks
South Project (DeWolf & Leonard) in the City
of Clovis, Fresno County, California
Varner AssociatesVarner, Dudley M.

FR-02577 2013 Cultural Resources Inventory for the
Proposed Sonrise Village in Clovis, Fresno
County, California
Applied EarthWorks, Inc.Baloian, Randy M.

FR-03012 2018 Cultural Resource Assessment for Tract
6225, City of Clovis Fresno County, California
Peak & Associates, Inc.Peak, Melinda A.Submitter - Job #18- 036

Page 1 of 1 ends

324
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

A RCHAEOLOGICAL R ESOURCES S URVEY A SSESSMENT
A UGUST 2022

D E W OLF A PARTMENTS P ROJECT

C LOVIS , C ALIFORNIA

\\lsaazfiles.file.core.windows.net\projects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments\PRODUCTS\DeWolf Apartments Archaeo Report.docx «08/22/22»

ATTACHMENT D

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION RESPONSE
325
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

Page 1 of 1 ends

June 22, 2022

Kerrie Collison
LSA

Via Email to: [email protected]

Re: DeWolf Apartments Project, Fresno County

Dear Ms. Collison:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,

Cameron Vela
Cultural Resources Analyst

Attachment

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

COMMISSIONER
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Raymond C.

Hitchcock
Miwok/Nisenan

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

326
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Big Sandy Rancheria of
Western Mono Indians
Elizabeth Kipp, Chairperson
P.O. Box
337

Auberry, CA,
93602
Phone: (
559
)
374
-
0066
Fax: (
559
)
374-0055
[email protected]
Western Mono
Cold Springs Rancheria of
Mono Indians
Jared Aldern,
P. O. Box
209

Tollhouse, CA,
93667
Phone: (
559
)
855
-
5043
Fax: (
559
)
855-4445
[email protected]
Mono
Cold Springs Rancheria of
Mono Indians
Carol Bill, Chairperson
P.O. Box
209

Tollhouse, CA,
93667
Phone: (
559
)
855
-
5043
Fax: (
559
)
855-4445
[email protected]
Mono
Dumna Wo-Wah Tribal
Government
Robert Ledger, Chairperson
2191
West Pico Ave.

Fresno, CA,
93705
Phone: (
559
)
540
-
6346
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Mono
Kings River Choinumni Farm
Tribe
Stan Alec,
3515
East Fedora Avenue
Fresno, CA,
93726
Phone: (
559
)
647
-
3227
Foothill Yokut
North Fork Rancheria of Mono
Indians
Elaine Fink, Chairperson
P.O .Box
929

North Fork, CA,
93643
Phone: (
559
)
877
-
2461
Fax: (
559
)
877-2467
[email protected]
Mono
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Katherine Perez, Chairperson
P.O. Box
717

Linden, CA,
95236
Phone: (
209
)
887
-
3415
[email protected]
Costanoan
Northern Valley
Yokut
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Timothy Perez,
P.O. Box
717

Linden, CA,
95236
Phone: (
209
)
662
-
2788
[email protected]
Costanoan
Northern Valley
Yokut
Picayune Rancheria of
Chukchansi Indians
Heather Airey, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
P.O. Box
2226

Oakhurst, CA,
93644
Phone: (
559
)
795
-
5986
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Picayune Rancheria of
Chukchansi Indians
Claudia Gonzales, Chairwoman
P.O. Box
2226

Oakhurst, CA,
93644
Phone: (
559
)
412
-
5590
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Table Mountain Rancheria
Bob Pennell, Cultural Resource
Director
P.O. Box
410

Friant, CA,
93626
Phone: (
559
)
325
-
0351
Fax: (
559
)
325-0394
[email protected]
Yokut
Table Mountain Rancheria
Brenda Lavell, Chairperson
P.O. Box
410

Friant, CA,
93626
Phone: (
559
)
822
-
2587
Fax: (
559
)
822-2693
[email protected]
Yokut
1 of 2
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5
of
the Health and Safety Code, Section
5097.94
of the Public Resource Section
5097.98
of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed DeWolf Apartments Project, Fresno County.

PROJ-2022-
003513
06/22/2022 09:22 AM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Fresno County
6/22/2022
327
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Traditional Choinumni Tribe
David Alvarez, Chairperson
2415
E. Houston Avenue
Fresno, CA,
93720
Phone: (
559
)
217
-
0396
Fax: (
559
)
292-5057
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Tule River Indian Tribe
Joey Garfield, Tribal Archaeologist
P. O. Box
589

Porterville, CA,
93258
Phone: (
559
)
783
-
8892
Fax: (
559
)
783-8932
joey.garfield@tulerivertribe-
nsn.gov
Yokut
Tule River Indian Tribe
Neil Peyron, Chairperson
P.O. Box
589

Porterville, CA,
93258
Phone: (
559
)
781
-
4271
Fax: (
559
)
781-4610
[email protected]
Yokut
Tule River Indian Tribe
Kerri Vera, Environmental
Department
P. O. Box
589

Porterville, CA,
93258
Phone: (
559
)
783
-
8892
Fax: (
559
)
783-8932
[email protected]
Yokut
Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom
Valley Band
Kenneth Woodrow, Chairperson
1179
Rock Haven Ct.

Salinas, CA,
93906
Phone: (
831
)
443
-
9702
kwood
8934
@aol.com
Foothill Yokut
Mono
2 of 2
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5
of
the Health and Safety Code, Section
5097.94
of the Public Resource Section
5097.98
of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed DeWolf Apartments Project, Fresno County.

PROJ-2022-
003513
06/22/2022 09:22 AM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Fresno County
6/22/2022
328
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

455 W Fir Ave • Clovis, CA 93611 • (559) 449-2700
www.provostandpritchard.com

Engineering • Structural • Geostructural • Surveying • Planning • Environmental • GIS • Construction Services • Hydrogeology • Consulting Clovis • Visalia • Bakersfield • Modesto • Los Banos • Chico • Sacramento • Sonora • San Luis Obispo • Boise, ID 9/1/2023

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Provost and Pritchard Consulting Group has prepared this technical memorandum summarizing the findings of our investigation into the water system infrastructure required to serve a proposed development located at the northwest corner of Ashlan and DeWolf Avenues (APN 555-042-70).

Project Information
It is our understanding that the proposed development (Project) will have a land use designation of high density residential (15.1 – 25.0 dwelling units per acre [du/ac]), which differs from the original designation of low residential (2.1 – 4.0 du/ac). originally considered for this area in the City of Clovis Water Master Plan (WMP) Update – Phase III (Provost & Pritchard, 2018).

The following is a summary of the project, and pertinent information related to it with regard to water supply:
• The Project is comprised of three, two-story, residential buildings. The combined total of the three buildings includes 28 residential dwelling units that occupy approximately 26,300 square feet. • The Project is proposed to be constructed on an approximately 1.62-acre parcel (APN: 555-042-70). • The Project is not large enough to trigger a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) per the California Water Code.
• The entire Project is within the Kings River service area for FID, which means the Project has access to water from the Kings River as a source of supply.
• The existing project site consists of a single-family residential building.

Collectively the existing water distribution facilities convey water from the surface water treatment plant and a local well near the Project. This portion of the City’s potable water system is within the pressure zone called “Zone 2.” Attachment A shows the existing and planned infrastructure in the area.

Assumptions
The following assumptions apply to this investigation:
• The City requires a minimum of two points of connection to the existing water system. • Master planned water infrastructure near the Project are existing. • The developer is responsible for sizing all water mains and other water related infrastructure internal to the Project.
• The Clovis Fire Department (CFD) requires a minimum fire flow of 1,800 gallons per minute (gpm) and a minimum residual pressure of 35 psi, per CFD Standard #2.3. • Existing and proposed water system demands will be based on unit demands from the WMP.

To: Gene Abella, PE
City of Clovis
From: Nicholas Jacobson, PE
Subject: Water Infrastructure Investigation for GPA 2023-002 at the Northwest Corner of Ashlan and DeWolf Avenues
Date: September 1, 2023
Appendix D
329
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

City of Clovis September 1, 2023
Water Infrastructure Investigation for GPA 2023-002 at the Northwest Corner of Ashlan and DeWolf Avenues Page 2 of 3 Job No.: 1017-23-001

G:\Clovis_City of - 1017\Ongoing\OG-2022\03 DRC 2021-0040 (NWC Ashlan and DeWolf)\Report and Calcs\20230816 GPA 2023-002 NWC Ashlan_DeWolf_FINAL.docx • Existing infrastructure sizes based on GIS data from City (see Attachment A). • Recycled water will not be applied to public landscaping surrounding the Project. • Hydraulic model analysis was not completed as part of this investigation.

Water Demand
Potable water demands for the Project were estimated using land-use-based unit water demand factors from the WMP. Table LU-2 in the Land Use Element of the City General Plan (GP) states that high density residential has an allowable density of 15.1 – 25.0 du/ac. The proposed use will consist of three separate residential buildings that have a total of 28 residential dwellings units on 1.62 acres, which equates to a density of 17.28 du/ac, consistent with the designation of high density residential land use. Table 1 summarizes unit demand factors used to estimate demand for typical planning conditions such as annual average, maximum day, and peak hour.

Table 1. Summary of Unit Water Demands by Land Use

SUMMARY OF UNIT WATER DEMANDS BY LAND USE
Land Use Annual Average
(AFY/ac)
Maximum Day
(gpm/ac)
Peak Hour
(gpm/ac)
Existing – Low Density Residential 2.50 2.63 4.65
Proposed – High Density Residential 4.70 4.95 8.74
Notes:

1. Source for unit water demand values was Table 5-3.1 in WMP.

2. Abbreviations: AFY = Acre-feet per year, gpm = gallons per minute, ac = acre(s)

Water usage for each demand category was estimated by multiplying gross acreage of land use type by its respective unit demand. Refer to Table 2 for a summary of anticipated water demands for existing and proposed conditions.

Table 2. Summary of Total Water Demands by Land Use

SUMMARY OF TOTAL WATER DEMANDS BY LAND USE
Land Use Area
(ac)
Annual Average
(AFY)
Maximum Day
(gpm)
Peak Hour
(gpm)
Existing – Low Density Residential 1.62 4.1 4.3 7.5
Proposed – High Density Residential 1.62 7.6 8.0 14.2

Infrastructure
There is an existing 16-inch water transmission main fronting the Project in Ashlan Avenue and an existing 12-inch water distribution main fronting the Project in DeWolf Avenue north of Ashlan Avenue. In addition, there is an 8-inch distribution main in DeWolf Avenue south of Ashlan Avenue.

Connection to the existing water system should be provided in two locations as required by City standards.

The information provided by the City for the Project does not provide locations for proposed connections to City distribution infrastructure.

330
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

City of Clovis September 1, 2023
Water Infrastructure Investigation for GPA 2023-002 at the Northwest Corner of Ashlan and DeWolf Avenues Page 3 of 3 Job No.: 1017-23-001

G:\Clovis_City of - 1017\Ongoing\OG-2022\03 DRC 2021-0040 (NWC Ashlan and DeWolf)\Report and Calcs\20230816 GPA 2023-002 NWC Ashlan_DeWolf_FINAL.docx Water Supply
Urbanization within Clovis occurs both inside and outside the Kings River service area for Fresno Irrigation District (FID), therefore not all lands have access to this water source. Lands generally located south and west of the Enterprise Canal are within the Kings River service area and as such are entitled to an average annual allotment of approximately 2.24 acre-feet per acre (AF/ac). Some land uses within the City have unit demands greater than the 2.24 AF/ac supply available. The City adopted an ordinance requiring new development with demands exceeding the allotment to pay fees, so the City can acquire additional water supply to serve the development. Since the entirety of the Project is within the FID service area, water from the Kings River is available to offset the anticipated annual demand of 7.6 acre-feet. See Table 3 for summary of reconciliation of supply and demand for existing and proposed land use conditions.

Table 3. Reconciliation of Supply and Demand

RECONCILIATION OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND
Land Use Average Day
Demand (AFY)
FID Entitlement
(AFY)
Additional Supply
Required (AFY)
Existing – Low Density Residential 4.1 3.6 (0.4)
Proposed – High Density Residential 7.6 3.6 (4.0)

Summary
Based on information collected during this investigation and the City’s adherence to recommendations from prior water supply planning efforts, the existing and planned water distribution system and recommended connections should be adequate to convey water supply to the Project to support anticipated demands from the Project. As the Project falls within the FID boundary, there is surface water entitlement available for its water supply, however the Project will need to pay fees to the City to make up a supply shortfall of about 4 AFY.

Serving this Project should not negatively impact the City’s ability to provide a supply and delivery of water to reasonably foreseeable users within the City assuming adherence to recommendations from prior water resources planning efforts. However, to understand the cumulative impacts to supplies and other major water infrastructure, the City should be tracking changes in demand as part of the development process in order to determine when projects with greater demand are offset by projects with demands lower than originally planned.

Enclosures: 1

Attachment A – Water Facilities Exhibit
c: Thad Avery

331
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
!?
!?

GETTYSBURG
Zone 2
LOCAN
ASHLAN
DEWOLF
Zone 1

SAGINAW
DONNER
0 250 500
Feet
º
Exhibit
Water Facilities
Water System Evaluation
8/21/2023: \\ppeng.com\pzdata\clients\Clovis_City of - 1017\GIS\1017OG01\2022\03 DRC 2021-0040 Ashland and DeWolf\400 GIS\Map\City_of_Clovis_ Ashland_DeWolf_Mapping\City_of_Clovis_ Ashland_DeWolf_Mapping.aprx Legend
Project_Site
!? Pressure Sustaining Valve
Pressure Zone Boundary
Existing Water Mains
Size (in inches)
8"
12"
16"
Attachment A
332
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

CARLSBAD
CLOVIS
IRVINE

LOS ANGELES

PALM SPRINGS

POINT RICHMOND

RIVERSIDE

ROSEVILLE

SAN LUIS OBISPO
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200, Riverside, California 92507 951.781.9310 www.lsa.net

MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 22, 2022
TO: Sean K. Smith, Supervising Civil Engineer, City of Clovis FROM: Ambarish Mukherjee, Principal
SUBJECT: DeWolf Apartments Project Trip Generation Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Memorandum
LSA has prepared this trip generation analysis and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis memorandum (memo) for the proposed DeWolf Apartments Project (project) located at 3182 DeWolf Avenue, northwest of the intersection of DeWolf Avenue and Ashlan Avenue, in Clovis.

Figure 1 (all figures and tables attached) illustrates the regional and project location.

The project will include development of 26 multifamily apartment units on a 1.62-acre site. Figure 2 illustrates the conceptual site plan for the project. The project will include a General Plan Amendment (GPA) because it changes the land use from Low Density (L) to High Density (H).

The objectives of this memo are:
• To perform a trip generation analysis and determine whether a Local Transportation Analysis (LTA) is required for the project; and
• To determine whether a VMT analysis is required for the project.

Trip Generation Analysis
The City of Clovis (City) Interim Transportation Impact Study (TIS) Guidelines, dated July 14, 2020, states that an LTA needs to be prepared if a project generates 100 or more trips during any peak hour or if the project includes a GPA that changes the use to a designation that has a potential to generate a higher number of vehicle trips than the existing or originally planned land use designation. The project trip generation was developed using rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) for Land Use 220 – “Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit.” Table A (attached) shows the project trip generation. As shown in Table A, the project is anticipated to generate 11 trips in the a.m. peak hour, 13 trips in the p.m. peak hour, and 175 daily trips. Therefore, the anticipated number of peak- hour trips generated by the proposed project is substantially lower than the trip threshold (100 peak-hour trips) established by the City’s TIS Guidelines for preparation of an LTA. As previously stated, the project includes a GPA. However, multifamily units are anticipated to generate lower trips than single-family detached houses permitted under Low Density land use in the City’s General Appendix E
333
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

8/22/22 (P:\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments\PRODUCTS\DeWolf Apartments Project Trip Generation and VMT Memo.docx) 2 Plan. Therefore, the project can be considered to be less intensive than the General Plan land use.

As such, an LTA may not be required for the project.

Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis
On December 28, 2018, the California Office of Administrative Law cleared the revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines for use. Among the changes to the Guidelines was removal of vehicle delay and level of service as the sole basis for determining CEQA impacts. With the adopted guidelines, transportation impacts are to be evaluated based on a project’s effect on VMT. The VMT analysis for the project was prepared based on the City’s TIS Guidelines.

As per the City’s TIS Guidelines, townhomes/attached residential projects including less than 68 dwelling units (DUs) can be considered to be screened from a VMT analysis since they generate less than 500 daily vehicle trips. As shown in Table A, the project is anticipated to generate only 175 daily trips, which is significantly lower than the City’s 500 daily trip threshold for screening of projects from a VMT analysis. Therefore, the project can be anticipated to have a less than significant VMT impact and may be screened out from a VMT analysis.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (951) 781-9310 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
LSA Associates, Inc.

Ambarish Mukherjee, AICP, PE
Principal
Attachments: Figure 1: Regional and Project Location
Figure 2: Conceptual Site Plan
Table A: Project Trip Generation
334
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

FIGURES
335
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

ASHLAN AVENUE

DE WOLF AVENUE
DeWolf Apartments Project
Trip Generation Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Memorandum Regional and Project Location
I:\HPT2201\GIS\fig1_Reg_ProjLoc.mxd (4/28/2022)
SOURCE: ESRI Streetmap, 2013; Google Earth, 2018.

FIGURE 1
S!!N
Project VicinityProject Vicinity
Project Location
Project VicinityProject Vicinity
Madera
County
Fresno
County
ÃÃ168
ÃÃ180
ÃÃ41
ÃÃ99
Project
Location
Project Vicinity
0 1000 2000
FEET
336
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

BIKE LANE
l'L -- ---- ----------------------------l'L ------- ---- - 00+300.13 OG +300.06

PROPOSED SITE
FIGURE 2
De Wolf Apartments Project
Trip Generation Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Memorandum Conceptual Site Plan 337
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

TABLES
338
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Land Use In Out Total In Out Total
Apartments 26 DU
Trips/Unit1

0.10 0.30 0.40 0.32 0.19 0.51 6.74
Trip Generation 3 8 11 8 5 13 175
Notes:

DU = Dwelling Units
1 Rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition), Land Use 220 ‐ "Multifamily Housing (Low‐Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit", Setting/Location ‐ "General Urban/Suburban."
Table A ‐ Project Trip Generation
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour DailyUnits
P:\HPT2201\Traffic\Trip Gen.xlsx\Trip Gen (7/14/2022)
339
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

8/23/22 (\\lsaazfiles.file.core.windows.net\projects\HPT2201 DeWolf Apartments\BACKGROUND\Built Environment\Memo-3182 De Wolf Ave.docx)

CARLSBAD
CLOVIS
IRVINE

LOS ANGELES

PALM SPRINGS

POINT RICHMOND

RIVERSIDE

ROSEVILLE

SAN LUIS OBISPO
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200, Riverside, California 92507 951.781.9310 www.lsa.net

MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 23, 2022
TO: Peter Sumal, Client
FROM: Casey Tibbet, M.A., Associate/Cultural Resources Manager/Architectural Historian SUBJECT: Historical Resources Evaluation of the Residence at 3182 De Wolf Avenue, Clovis, California (LSA Project Number HPT2201)

In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), LSA completed a historical resources evaluation of the single-family residence at 3182 De Wolf Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number 555-042-70) in Clovis, California. The residence was documented on Department of Parks and Recreation forms and evaluated under the criteria for listing in the California Register of Historical Places (California Register). To accomplish this, LSA conducted research and completed a field survey of the property.

As a result of these efforts, it was determined that the 1970 Ranch-style residence does not appear to be eligible for listing in the California Register under any criteria. It is an unremarkable example of a common type and style, and no evidence was found indicating it is associated with important people in history. It was built during the post-World War II residential development boom (1945– 1973), which is a significant event in history, but is not part of a residential subdivision and individually it is no more representative of this event than millions of similar residences throughout the region.

For these reasons, the residence at 3182 De Wolf Avenue does not qualify as a “historical resource” as defined by CEQA and, for purposes of this project, the City of Clovis may make a finding of “no impact” with regard to historic-period (50 years of age or older) built environment resources.

Attachment: DPR 523A Form
Appendix F
340
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information

State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 6Z
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 5 ends

P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location:  Not for Publication  Unrestricted *a. County: Fresno and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Clovis, CA Date: 1981 T13S; R21E; Section 14; M.D.B.M. c. Address: 3182 De Wolf Avenue City: Clovis Zip: 93619 d. UTM: Zone: 11; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #): Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 555-042-70, located on the northeast corner of Ashlan Avenue and De Wolf Avenue.

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This one-story, Ranch-style residence is situated on the northwest corner of De Wolf Avenue and Ashlan Avenue in an area that is primarily developed with single-family residential subdivisions and Clovis High School . The house is irregular in plan, rests o n a raised foundation, and is surmounted by a low -pitched side-gable and gable-on-hip roof sheathed with composition shingles that has moderate eaves. The exterior walls are clad with a combination of board-and-batten siding (entry area) , stucco, and brick veneer (front porch area) . Fenest ration consists of modern vinyl-framed sliding windows, one of which is flanked by decorative shutters. The east -facing façade includes a recessed, stucco-clad wing with one window flanked by shutters, a south-facing window, a covered porch that shelters tw o windows and the recessed main entry, a projecting stucco -clad wing with a ribbon window. The porch roof is supported by three wood posts. The south elevation has no openings. The west (rear) elevation has two garage doors, a patio cover supported by wood posts, a wood and glass door, and some windows. The north elevation has two windows. The property is in fair condition and, aside from the modern windows and s tucco, appears to retain a fair degree of integrity.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2-Single-family property *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.)

P5b. Description of Photo: (View,
date, accession #) Façade, view to
the west (5/27/22). Façade, view to
the northwest (5/27/22)

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: Historic
Prehistoric Both
1970 (Redfin 2022)

*P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown

*P8. Recorded by:
(Name,
affiliation, and address)
Casey Tibbet, M.A.

LSA Associates, Inc.
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92507

*P9. Date Recorded:

May 27, 2022

*P10. Survey Type:
(Describe) Intensive-level CEQA compliance

*P11. Report Citation:
(Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.")

*Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record  Other (List):

P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.)

341
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information

State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD

Page 2 of 5 ends

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 3182 De Wolf Avenue B1. Historic Name:

B2. Common Name:

B3. Original Use: Single-family residence B4. Present Use: Single family residence *B5. Architectural Style: Ranch
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) A public r ecords request was submitted to t he City of Clovis requesting all building permits for this address. The City responded that it has no permits for this address. According to Redfin, a real estate website, Fresno County records indicate the residence was bu ilt in 1970 (Redfin 2022). Thi s is supported by a historic aerial photograph dated May 1, 1970, that clearly shows the residence ( Fresno State var.). Aerial photographs taken in 1967 show the subject property developed as agricultural land with no buildings (Fresno State var.).

*B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features:

B9a. Architect: None found. b. Builder: None found. *B10. Significance: Theme: Post World-War II Residential Development (1945-1973); Residential Architecture Area: City of Clovis
Period of Significance: 1970 Property Type: Residential Applicable Criteria: NA (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
This 1970 Ranch-style residence is not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) under any criteria. No local criteria for historical significance were found. It is not a historical resource as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Historic Context. Clovis started as a freight stop along the San Joaquin Valley Railroad ( SJVRR) in 1891 (Clovis Rotary n.d.). The SJVRR purchased land from local farmers Clovis Cole and Geo rge Owen and constructed tracts on the borderline between the two properties (Clovis Rotary n.d.). Although they built the station on the land formerly owne d by Owens, they named it Clovis (Clovis Rotary n.d.). In December 1891, Marcus Pollasky, a Michigan railroad (see Continuation Sheet)

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
(List attributes and codes)

*B12. References:

California Department of Transportation
2011 Tract Housing in California, 1945-1973. A Context for National Register Evaluation. Caltrans Division of Environmental Analysis, Sacramento.

City of Clovis
n.d. About Clovis. Website: https://cityofclovis.com/government/about-clovis/ (accessed online February 2022).

Clovis Rotary
n.d. History of Clovis. Website: https://clovisrotaryclub.com/History%20of%20Clovis.html (accessed online February 2022).

Fresno State
Var. Aerial Photograph Collection. Website:
https://guides.library.fresnostate.edu/mapcollections/aerialph otocollection (accessed online June 2022).

See Continuation Sheet

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Casey Tibbet, M.A., LSA Associates, Inc. , 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200, Riverside, CA 92507

*Date of Evaluation: June 2022

(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

Refer to DPR Location Map
342
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial

Page 3 of 5 ends

*Recorded by LSA Associates, Inc. *Date: June 2022 X Continuation Update

*B10. Significance (continued from page 2)
speculator and partner in the S JVRR, bought additional land from Owens and Cole where Fres no civil engineer Ingvart Tielman mapped a townsite (Clov is Rotary n.d.). Laid out on what had been Owens’ land, the townsite was named Clovis and featured streets named for the principals in the S JVRR (Clovis Rotary n.d.). Around this same time, a group o f Michigan lumbermen were acquiring thousands of acres of timber in the Sierra Nevada about 75 miles northeast of Fresno (Clovis R otary n.d.). They built a dam across Stevenson Creek, creating a lake that helped them move freshly cut timber to a mill next to the lake and from there they constructed a 42-mile long, 25-foot high, V -shaped flume that propelled the lumber to a planing m ill east of the Clovis rai lroad station (Clovis Rotary n.d.). The flume was completed in 1894 and the commencement of operations at the Clovis mill stimulated development around Clovis (Clovis Rotary n.d.). Mill employees began building houses near the mil l and soon businesses, chu rches, and schools were built to support the new community. In addition to the mill, the expansion of grain production and livestock raising contributed to the growth of the town (City of Clovis n.d.). The post office opened in 1895, and by 1896, the town had a population of about 500 (Clovis Rotary n.d.).

Clovis incorporated in 1912 (City of Clovis n.d.). In 1914, the mill burned and was not rebuilt (Clovis Rotary n.d.). Clovis, which remained an agricultural community into the 1970s, has celebrated its western lifestyle with the annual Clovis Rodeo, as well as street festivals such as Big Hat Days, ClovisFest, and Friday Night Farmer’s Market (Historicaerials.com var.; Clovis Rotary n.d.).

People Associated with this Residence. No information about any people associated with this residence was found.

Architectural Context. Typical characteristics of the Ranch style include a one-story configuration; a sprawling layout, often laid out in an L or U shape that creates backyard priv acy; low-pitched hip, gable, or gable- on-hip roof with wide eaves ; a variety of wood, brick, and stucco siding, often in combination; wood-frame, double-hung windows, often with multiple lights or diamond-panes; a large picture window in the façade, often flanked by narrower windows; and an att ached two-car garage. Decor ative features include scalloped vergeboards, false cupolas and dovecotes, extended gable eaves, and turned porch suppo rts. Later examples of the style incorporate aluminum-framed vertical-slider windows instead of wood-framed double-hung windows.

Significance Evaluation. This property is being evaluated under the criteria for listing in the California Register in compliance with CEQA. No local criteria for historical significance were found.

Criterion 1 - Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. This residence is associated with the post -World War II residential boom that made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local, regio nal, and even national history . “More than 40 million housing units were built in the United States during the 30 year per iod following the end of World War II, and at least 30 million of these were single-family houses” (California Department of Transpor tation 2011:2). These homes we re typically modest in size and style and constructed in a short time as part of large tract s marketed to the working class. “The fundamental unit for postwar housing is not the individual house, but the tract, or a single construction phase within a large r tract or new community” and typically a s ingle home would not be indi vidually significant in this context (California Department of Transportation 2011:121). As with most homes associated with this historic context, individually this residence is unimportant and insignificant.

Criterion 2 - Associated with the lives of persons important to lo cal, California or national history. No evidence was found indicating that any historically significant persons are associated with this residence.

Criterion 3 - Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values. The residence embodies several of the character-defining features of the Ranch style of architecture including a one-story configuration, a low-pitched gable and gab le-on-hip roof, a co mbination of brick, stucco, and wood siding, and an attached , two-car garage. However, it is a pedestrian example of the style that doe s not rise to a level above the ordinary. No evidence was found that it is the work of a master, and it does not possess high artistic values.

Criterion 4 - Has yielded, or has the potent ial to yield, infor mation important to the prehistory or history of t he local area, California or the nation. This residence was built in 1970 using common materials and construction practices. It does not have the potential to yield information important to the history or prehistory of the local area, California, or the nation.

See Continuation Sheet
343
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial

Page 4 of 5 ends

*Recorded by LSA Associates, Inc. *Date: June 2022 X Continuation Update

*B12. References: (continued from page 2)
Historicaerials.com
Var. Website: https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer (accessed June 2022).

Marthedal
1976-2022 Clovis, California: History, Facts, and Information. Website: https://aamarthedal.com/clovis-california-facts- information/#:~:text=The%20city%20got%20its%20name,named%20after%20Cole's%20first%20name (accessed February 2022).

Redfin
2022 3182 De Wolf Avenue. Website: https://www.redfin.com/CA/Clovis/3182-De-Wolf-Ave-93619/home/143276636#property- details (accessed May 2022).

344
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

I:\HPT2201\GIS\MXD\Cultural\DPRlocation_55504270.mxd (6/10/2022) DPR 523J (1/95) *Required Information

Page 5 of 5 ends

*Map Name: *Scale: 1:24000 *Date of Map: 1981, 1978; 2022 *Resource Name or 3182 De Wolf Avenue
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
State of California - Resource Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LOCATION MAP
DeW
olfAve
Ashlan Ave
APN 555-042-70
3182 De Wolf Avenue
USGS 7.5' Quad, Clovis, Round Mountain; Nearmap
345
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Brad Kerner, PE  [email protected]
451 Clovis Ave, Suite 200  Clovis CA 93612  Tel (559) 326-1400

P:\219-0204\_Documents\Report\219204(19) Letter Report02_28-MFRD on Ashlan and DeWolf.doc

Gene G. Abella September 5, 2023
City of Clovis File No. 219-0204(19)
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612

Subject: 28-Unit Multiple Family Development on Ashlan Avenue and DeWolf Avenue, GPA 2023-002
Dear Gene:

This letter provides the results and findings of our wastewater service study for GPA 2023-002, pursuant to your July 24, 2023 email message.

Under the entitlement, a developer proposes to construct a 28-unit multi-family residential development (MFRD) on a 1.62 acre parcel of land situated near the northwest corner of Ashlan Avenue and DeWolf Avenue, namely Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 555-04-70. The City of Clovis Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (M aster Plan) is based on a hydraulic model of t he wastewater system. Included in the hydraulic model are various land use designations together with the appropriate wastewater flow generation rates for each land use. The Master Plan currently sh ows the area where the MFRD is proposed as a Low Density R esidential land use, which has a lower wastewater flow generation rate than the proposed Medium High Density Residential land use of MFRD. The higher wastewater flow generation rate for the proposed MFRD was ev aluated using the hydraulic model to determine the potential effect of the proposed development on the City's wastewater system. For the purposes of this letter report, “Master Plan Model” refers to the hydraulic model corresponding to the Mast er Plan, and “MFRD Evaluation Model” refers to the same hy draulic model as slightly modified to reflect the proposed change from Low Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential land use for the subject site.

Figure 1 provides a “screen shot” e xhibit showing the Master Plan Model output for buildout con ditions.

The sewers that are planned to convey wastewater flow for the subject site provide more than sufficient capacity to accommodate the planned wastewater flows, as illustrated by the maximu m relative depths or depth-to-diameter (d/D) ratios shown fo r each sewer reach under peak wastewater flow conditions. The Wastewater Master Plan prescribes a maximum allowable d/D ratio of 0.82 for the analysis of existing sewers, and 0.65 for the sizing design of planned sewers.

Manhole 123.03 is the Master Plan Model node that would receive wastewater flow from the sewer service sub -area that includes the subject site. The Master Plan Model calculates an average daily wastewater flow for buildout condit ions at Manhole 123.03 of 0.029021 million gallons per day (M GD).

The planned wastewater flow generation rate for Low Density Residential land use areas is 0.0005 80 MGD per acre. The proposed MFRD is on a 1. 62 acre parcel, but since sewer subareas include roads, the su bject site affects 2.47 acres according to the criteria of the Master Plan. Currently this area accounts for 0.001433 MGD of the total flow calculated at Manhole 123.03 in the Master Plan Model. For the buildout condition of the model, already deve loped areas within the Fowler service area are subject to calibration (see Section 4.9.1 of the 2017 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan Report). Manhole 123.03 has a calibration factor of 0. 813829. Applying this factor to the calculated 0.001433 MGD to the October 27, 2023: Addendum
Sean Smith, PE - Supervising Civil Engineer
Appendix G
346
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
28-Unit Multiple Family Development on Ashlan Avenue and DeWolf Avenue, GPA 2023-002

Page 2 of 4 ends

P:\219-0204\_Documents\Report\219204(19) Letter Report02_28-MFRD on Ashlan and DeWolf.doc Master Plan flow rate at Manhole 123.03 produces a 0.001166 flow rate for the buildout condition of the subject area.

Figure 1: Master Plan Model for Buildout Conditions
The Master Plan provides criteria for selecting the wastewater flow ge neration rates for various land uses for future development s. For some residential land uses, a dwelling -unit-per-acre (du/acre) method is used. The Medium High Density Residential classification is used for developments between 7.10 and

15.00 du/acre. The proposed MFRD i s 28 units situated on 2.47 acres. This res ults in an approximate value of 11.3 du/acre, which falls within t he Medium High Density Res idential range . Medium High Density Residential land uses are assigned a wastewater flow generation rate of 0.001459 MGD per acre.

The MFRD Evaluation Model reflec ts the elimination of 2.47 acres of Low Density Residential land use, and the addition of the same area of Medium High Residential land use, for the sewer service sub -area tributary to Manhole 123.03. This results in a net increase in planned tributary flo w for Manhole 123.03 of

0.002438 MGD, which is an increase of approximately 8.4 percent compared to the buildout condition of the Master Plan Model. The resulting total average wastewater flow calculated for t he MFRD Evaluation Model is 0.031467 MGD at Manhole 123.03.

Figure 2 provides a “screen shot” exhibit showing the MFRD Evaluation Model output for the buildout condition. The sewers that would convey wastewater flow for the proposed MFRD provide more than sufficient capacity to accommodate the calcula ted wastewater flows, as illustrated by the maximum d/D ratios shown for each sewer reach. The MFRD Evaluation Model calculates higher d/D ratios than the Master Plan Model, but even those higher d/D ratios are well below the maximum relative depth criteri a prescribed by the Master Plan, for both existing and planned sewers.

The 12-inch sewer along DeWolf Avenue eventually leads to Clovis’ connection to the regional Fresno - Clovis wastewater collection system at Fowler Avenue and Griffith Avenue. At that connection, the Master Plan Model estimates that the average wastewater flow discharged to the regional Fowler Trunk Sewer High Density Residential (15-25 units/acare) = 0.002445 MGD/acre Net increase for MH123.03 = 0.004035 MGD
347
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
28-Unit Multiple Family Development on Ashlan Avenue and DeWolf Avenue, GPA 2023-002

Page 3 of 4 ends

P:\219-0204\_Documents\Report\219204(19) Letter Report02_28-MFRD on Ashlan and DeWolf.doc will be 3.9785 MGD, and that the peak wastewater flow will be 6.0086 MGD. Similarly, the MFRD Model estimates an average wastewater flow of 3.9809 MGD and a peak wastewater flow of 6.0126 MGD.

Figure 2: MFRD Model for Buildout Conditions

Prior to the study, the City of Clovis has approved multiple development s within the Fowler Service Area that exceed the sewer flowrates prescribed in th e Master Plan. Two of these developments were addressed in the Blair, Church and Flynn sewer study for DRC 2 021-00001 which involves TM 6349 and TM6260. Additionall y, the City has ma de us aware of a third tract (TM6225) and have provided its net flow increase (0.012220 MGD).

Given their location, these other Tracts do not compete for sewer capacity with GPA 2023 -002 until tributary flows meet at the inter section of Fowler Avenue and As hlan Avenue. This 36 -inch sewer has ample capacity for both developments with a max d/D of 0.40. The summary of flow increases and their impact o n Clovis’ connection to the regional Fresno -Clovis wastewater collection system at Fowler Avenue and Griffith Avenue can be seen in the following Tables 1 and 2.

Development 28-Unit MFRD TM6349 TM6260 TM6225
Sewer Flow (MGD) 0.002438 0.003401 0.002855 0.012220
Average Daily flow Increase

Table 1: Developments that Exceed Master Plan Sewer Flow

0.004035
348
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
28-Unit Multiple Family Development on Ashlan Avenue and DeWolf Avenue, GPA 2023-002

Page 4 of 4 ends

P:\219-0204\_Documents\Report\219204(19) Letter Report02_28-MFRD on Ashlan and DeWolf.doc Master Plan Config.

Master Plan Config.

With Develpoments
(Table 1)
Difference
(increase)
Avg Flow (MGD) 3.978453 3.999367 0.020914
Peak Flow (MGD) 6.008600 6.040673 0.032073Buildout
Scenario
Fowler Connection

Table 2: Impact on Fresno-Clovis Wastewater Connection on Fowler In summary, our evaluation indicates that the existing and planned wastewater collection system facilities can accommodate the proposed change from Low Density Residential to Medium High Residential land use for the subject site. However, it should be noted that there may be competing interests for available wastewater flow capacity in the regional Fowler Trunk Sewer. With the exception o f TM6349, TM6260 and TM6225 this analysis only evaluates the potential wastewater service implications of the proposed development in the context of the current Master Plan. It does not consider the effect of other potential allocations of available wastewater flow capacity, whether temporary or permanent, as may be allowed by the City for other proposed developments or other purposes.

If you have questions or comments, or if you requ ire additional information, you are invited to con tact me or Nathan Fastenau any time, as always. Many thanks, and…

Best Regards,

BLAIR, CHURCH & FLYNN CONSULTING ENGINEERS

Brad Kerner, PE
Project Manager

Date Signed: 5 September 2023

October 27, 2023:

The report miscalculates the proposed density as Medium High (7.1-15.0 units/acre) instead of High (15.1-25.0 units/acre). The adjustment to the net increase at MH123.03 should be 0.004035 MGD instead of 0.002438 MGD as indicated in the report. Given the d/D ratios in the area are well below the design criteria of the Master Plan, it is my determination that the miscalculation does not change the findings of the report of adequacy in the existing system to provide service to the site and the proposed density change.

Sean Smith, PE - Supervising Civil Engineer
349
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services
DATE: April 15, 2024
SUBJECT: Consider Approval – Res. 24-___, A Resolution Declaring the Intention to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25, Authorizing the City of Clovis Engineering D ivision to conduct a property owner Proposition 218 proceeding, Approving the Fiscal Year 2024 -25 Preliminary Engineer’s Report, and setting a Public Hearing for June 17, 2024, or at such time thereafter for Area 1 of Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 (Blackhorse Estates).

Staff: Sean Smith, Supervising Civil Engineer
Recommendation: Approve

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 24-___

2. FY 2024-25 Preliminary Engineer’s Report

3. Vicinity Map

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Councilmembers should consider recusal if a campaign contribution exceeding $250 has been received from the project proponent (developer, applicant, agent, and/or participants) within the preceding 12 months (Government Code 84308).

RECOMMENDATION
For the City Council to approve Resolution 24-__, which will:

1. Declare the intention to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-25; and

2. Authorize the City of Clovis Engineering D ivision to conduct a property owner Proposition 218 proceeding for Area 1; and

3. Approve the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Preliminary Engineer’s Report; and

4. Set a Public Hearing for June 17, 2024, or at such time thereafter for Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 (Blackhorse Estates).

350
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 (the “District”) is divided into Benefit Area 1, which consists of 45 homes and is known as the Renaissance neighborhood and Benefit Area 2, which consists of 81 homes and is known as the Country View neighborhood, for a total of 126 homes. Each area is a gated community where each home is assessed annually to pay for maintenance of the street and la ndscaping facilities, including sidewalks, curbs and gutters, pavement, valley gutters, entrance control gates, median island landscaping, drainage inlets and streetlights benefitting the homes within the District.

Benefit Area 2 has a sufficient cash flo w currently and no increase is proposed for their annual assessments. Area 1 does not have sufficient funding. On July 19, 2023, Area 1 residents did not approve a proposed increase. The fund has been depleted well below the desired operating cost. Since that time, costs continue to rise and the current assessments for Area 1 do not provide funding adequate to provide for routine maintenance. If the residents of Area 1 do not approve a proposed increase this year, staff is recommending the city begin the process of dissolving Area 1 as an assessment district managed by the City of Clovis

The assessments also do not provide funding for future capital projects or large and unexpected repairs. Therefore, it is staff’s recommendation to increase rates by $373 per year, per home in Area 1 to keep up with basic area maintenance as well as build the fund reserve for future capital maintenance projects. Any increase in assessments requires a Proposition 218 vote of the property owners. Staff is requesting authorization to conduct a property owner Proposition 218 proceeding to request an annual assessment increase for Benefit Area 1. In the event that Council does not authorize a property owner Proposition 218 proceeding, staff will recommend Council to dissolve Area 1 due to a lack of funds. In addition, staff is requesting the other actions necessary for the annual levy and collection of assessments.

BACKGROUND
The District provides maintenance services for a gated community located at the southeast corner of Alluvial and Minnewawa Avenues and was created under the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 . The maintenance services provided include sidewalks, curbs and gutters, pavement, valley gutters, entrance control gates, median islands and landscaping, drainage inlets and streetlights within the District. The maintenance activities are managed through a contract with Regency Property Management, a real estate management firm.

The purpose of the District is to provide all of the necessary street maintenance activities within the tract including gated entries and exits. The streets and gate systems are privately owned. All maintenance within the District is performed on a contractual basis, utilizing private contractors, and funded by the District assessments. All administrative coordination is performed by Regency Property Management who is contracted by the City on behalf of the District and funded from the assessments.

History
Benefit Assessment District 1995 -1 was formed in 1995 to provide a funding s ource for the maintenance of the private streets within the subdivision as a result of the developers, and some prospective property owners within the subdivision, desire to have security gates. 351
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

The first phase of the subdivision (Tract 4299) was original ly recorded as a conventional subdivision with public streets and no gates at the entrances and exits. Subsequent to the recording of that map, the developer decided that he wanted the community to be gated and requested the City’s assistance in finding a way to provide security gates at the entrances and exits. In order for any subdivision or any other development to be gated, the streets or areas behind the gates needed to be privately owned. With no HOA in place and no desire to form an HOA for the subdi vision, the City provided a way to accommodate the developer’s request as follows:
 Streets within the subdivision were abandoned.
 Subdivision was remapped (Tract 4299A), providing for ownership of the roads to the centerline of the streets by the individual lot owners.  Public utility easements were retained for the City sewer and water systems.  An irrevocable offer of dedication of the streets was provided to the City so that the City could reclaim the street area should that become necessary.  Assessment District 95-1 was formed to cover maintenance of the streets, gates, etc.

Differences between an Assessment District and a HOA
Some of the most pertinent differences between an Assessment District and a HOA involve the management of the funds. With this District, the owners provide the assessments through their property taxes and the City manages how the funds are spent. It is important to note that public funds cannot be used for the District and that day-to-day decisions for the spending of the funds lies with the City. Any increase in the assessments is required to be put to a vote of the owners according to Prop 218. In contrast, a HOA defines these roles through their Bylaws. California Civil Code provides a HOA with the ability to increase assessment s by up to 20% annually without a vote of their membership. As a comparison, the District’s rates from creation to date have averaged an annual increase of approximately 5% in both Area 1 and Area 2.

Maintenance
The intent of the maintenance district is to provide all the necessary street maintenance activities in the tract. Since the streets are private, no public funds may be expended on maintenance activities and no City crews may be utilized for street maintenance activities. All maintenance within the district is to be performed on a contractual basis, utilizing private contractors, and funded by district assessments. All administrative coordination is to be performed by a private management firm contracted by the City on behalf of the district and fun ded from the assessments. The management firm is to be responsible for the street maintenance activities including the following:
 Repair of damaged concrete facilities such as sidewalks, curb and gutter, and valley gutters.
 Maintenance of entry gates including repair or replacement of damaged gates, repair of opening mechanisms, repair of entry communication facilities, operational maintenance (painting, lubrication, etc.).
 Periodic street sweeping.
 Landscape maintenance of entry features and entry medians.  Pavement maintenance, including pothole patching and any necessary pavement striping or stenciling.
352
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
 Pavement preventative maintenance including seal coats and overlays.  Coordination and resolution of complaints from tract residents that deal with street conditions such as cleaning, surface drainage, etc.

Perpetual City Responsibilities
As originally envisioned, the City was responsible for the annual administration of the Benefit Assessment District, and it was anticipated that these duties would be limited to the following:
 Noticing of tract residents of the annual assessment hearing.  Convening an Annual Public Hearing to consider adjustment to the district assessments.  Collecting the assessments and minimal financial overview of expenditures to assure fiduciary responsibility (general accounting to be provided by district management firm hired by the City on behalf of the district).
 Administrative review of the Annual Assessment Report.  Forwarding occasional service requests received by the City to the management company for resolution.

Current Status
When the original district was formed, the intent for raising revenue was to do so as needed following a City Council Public Hearing. However, subsequent to formation, Proposition 218 was voted into law requiring a property owner election in order to increase assessments. Since that time, the ability to increase revenue to the levels needed to properly take care of needed maintenance has been limited. As a result, preventative maintenance activities have be en put off due to insufficient funding. With the age of the streets within both benefit areas being 25+ years with no preventative maintenance performed and the fund balances finally at levels to fund the slurry seal projects, the slurry seals were completed in 2022.

Area 1
The last increase to the Area 1 assessments was 2021. Since that time, the cost for routine maintenance has risen significantly. With these increased costs and not having an increase in funds due to the July 19, 2023, Prop 218 vote not passing, the fund has been depleted well below the desired operating cost. The costs for the current fiscal year 2023 -24 required the elimination of street sweeping and landscape services to stay within budget. The budget proposed for 2024 -25 remains very trim and includes some of the basic routine maintenance plus the following:
 Gate replacement in the incident that the gate mechanics are damaged. Due to the age of the gate, parts to fix the existing gate are becoming extremely hard to find and will be more cost effective to replace the gate with a modern gate mechanics.  Restoration of services for street sweeping on a bi-monthly basis.  Restoration of weekly landscape services.

In order to achieve this budget, staff is recommending that a Proposition 218 p roceeding be conducted this year. If the property owners vote for the annual assessment increase of $373.00 per home per year plus an annual increase of $55 (approximately 5%) to the maximum assessment from Fiscal Year 2025-26 through Fiscal Year 2028-29, the annual revenues will be sufficient to continue to perform the needed maintenance and build a reserve for future maintenance activities. A passing vote this year from the property owners will allow the annual 353
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
increase of $55 to be implemented without an annual vote through Fiscal Year 2028-29, and as long as the increases are justified through an Engineer’s Report for each year.

If a Proposition 218 vote to increase the annual assessments for Benefit Area 1 is not successful, staff would have to work with Francisco & Associates as well as Regency Property Management to dissolve Benefit Area 1 as an assessment district managed by the City of Clovis. Staff worked with the City Attorney’s office following last year’s failed vote to determine the process to dissolve a portion of the Assessment District. The process to dissolve includes a noticed public hearing in which public input is considered before Council decides whether or not to dissolve. The resolution presented to Council at that public hearing would state that the current assessment and services would continue through the end of the current fiscal year (June 30) as funds allow and that the Area would be dissolved effective on July 1. 2024.

Area 2
The last increase to the Area 2 assessments was in 2022. This increase included provision for future street preventative maintenance, and the fund remains in good shape this year. T he current level of assessments is adequate to cover the costs of routine maintenance, provide for a fund reserve, and accumulate funds for future capital projects despite the increases in costs.

The budget for Area 2 will need to be monitored and reevaluated each year to ensure adequate funding levels are maintained.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City as long as the District remains solvent. If the District is not able to sustain and perform routine maintenance, the ultimate eventuality is that the streets would revert back to the City and the City would be responsible for the maintenance. The District would need to turn over streets that meet City standards which could result in a lien on each home for their share of the costs to bring the street improvements to current City standard. If the street system we re to revert to the City, there would be perpetual maintenance responsibility thereafter. Should the Proposition 218 proceeding pass, assessment rates will increase by $373 (plus $55/year) per home per year in Benefit Area 1 (Renaissance neighborhood).

For Benefit Area 2, the current level of assessments is adequate to cover the costs of routine maintenance, provide for a fund reserve, and accumulate funds for future capital projects despite the increases in costs. The budget for Area 2 will need to be mon itored and reevaluated each year to ensure adequate funding levels are maintained.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
The fund balance for Benefit Area 1 is depleted and will not have a sustainable budget without an increase in assessments to provide the cash flow necessary for sustained routine maintenance or for future capital projects . Benefit Area 2 will have a positive cash flow for the upcoming fiscal year.

354
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
City staff will work with Francisco and Associates as well as Regency Property Management to begin the formal Proposition 218 proceeding in Benefit Area 1 of the Blackhorse Estates development. The remaining schedule is as follows:

1. April 16, 2024 - Mail notices and ballots to affected property owners within Benefit Area 1 (minimum of 45 days prior to Public Hearing).

2. June 17, 2024 – City Council Meeting
• Conduct Public Hearing and deadline for property owners to submit ballots. • Ballot Tabulation conducted at City Council chambers at the start of the item being heard. • Declare results of Ballot Tabulation and approve Final Engineer’s Report by the end of the item being heard.

Prepared by: Sean Smith, Supervising Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: City Manager JH
355
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 24-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS

DECLARING THE INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF CLOVIS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO CONDUCT A PROPERTY OWNER PROPOSITION 218 PROCEEDING, APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT, AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 17, 2024, OR AT SUCH TIME THEREAFTER FOR BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1 (BLACKHORSE ESTATES)

WHEREAS, on May 1, 1995, the City Council approved Resolution 95-42 creating Benefit Assessment District 95-1 (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter of the California Government Code (commencing with Section 54703) (hereafter referred to as the “Act”). The District is comprised of the Blackhorse Estates development and is divided into Benefit Area 1 (Renaissance neighborhood) and Benefit Area 2 (Country View neighborhood); and

WHEREAS, the District provides annual assessment revenue to fund the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of street and landscaping facilities, including but not limited to, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, pavement, valley gutters, entrance control gates, median island landscaping, drainage inlets and street lights benefitting the parcels within the District; and

WHEREAS, the City Council proposes to conduct a Proposition 218 proceeding with property owners located within Benefit Area 1 (Renaissance neighborhood) to approve assessment increases needed to cover significant increases in maintenance costs due to inflation, provide funding for the City to maintain street, street lighting, and landscaping facilities at their current level, and also provide funding for future capital projects associated with Benefit Area 1 (Renaissance neighborhood); and

WHEREAS, the Preliminary Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024 -25 has been presented to the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Preliminary Engineer’s Report as presented and is preliminarily satisfied with the Report, each and all the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the levy amounts, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the special benefit received from construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of public improvements to be performed within the District, as set forth in said Report.

356
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Clovis as follows:

1. Intention: The City Council hereby declares that it is its intention to seek the annual levy and collection of assessments of the District pursuant to the Act, over and including the land within the District boundary, and to levy and collect assessments on all such land to pay the annual costs associated with the District improvements. The City Council finds that the public’s best interest requires such levy and collection.

2. District Boundaries: The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District.

3. District Improvements: The public improvements include sidewalks, curbs and gutters, pavement, valley gutters, entrance control gates, median islands and landscaping in the median islands, dra inage inlet structures, and streetlights located within the boundaries of the District.

4. Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed Fiscal Year 2024 -25 assessments for the parcels within the District are outlined in the Engineer’s Report which details the proposed increases in annual assessments for Benefit Area 1 (Renaissance neighborhood) and the proposed annual assessments for Benefit Area 2 (Country View neighborhood).

5. Public Hearing(s): The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Publ ic Hearing concerning the levy of assessments for the District on Monday, June 17, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as feasible at Clovis City Council Chambers, 1033 Fifth Street, Clovis, California.

6. Notice: The City shall give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing to all affected property owners of the District in accordance with the requirements of Proposition 218 and by causing the publishing of this Resolution once in the local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the Public Hearing. Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the Public Hearing, or, having previously filed a protest, may file a written withdrawal of that protest. A written protest shall state a ll grounds of objection and a protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such property owner. At the Public Hearing, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard.

357
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
* * * * *

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on April 15, 2024, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

358
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

City of Clovis
BeneﬁtÊAssessmentÊDistrictÊNo.Ê95-1
FiscalÊYearÊ2024-25
PreliminaryÊEngineer’sÊReport
April 15, 2024
Attachment 2
359
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2024-25 TABLE OF CONTENTS

-i-

Page No.

Agency Directory ........................................................................................ ii

Certificates................................................................................................. iii

SECTION I Introduction ..........................................................................1

SECTION II Engineer’s Report .................................................................3

Part A - Plans and Specifications .....................................................5

Part B - Estimate of Cost .................................................................6 Table 1 – Cost Estimate Benefit Area I (Renaissance) ........7 Table 2 – Cost Estimate Benefit Area II (Country View) ......8

Part C - Assessment District Diagram..............................................9

Part D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment ......................... 11

Part E - Property List and Assessment Roll ...................................14

Appendix A - Detailed Statement of Costs for Benefit Area I (Renaissance)

Appendix B - Detailed Statement of Costs for Benefit Area II (Country View)

Appendix C - Assessment Roll
360
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2024-25 AGENCY DIRECTORY

-ii-

CITY OF CLOVIS

AGENCY DIRECTORY

FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

City Council Members

Lynne Ashbeck
Mayor

Vong Mouanoutoua Matt Basgall
Mayor Pro-Tem Councilmember

Drew Bessinger Diane Pearce
Councilmember Councilmember

City Staff Members

John Holt
City Manager

Scott Cross Andrew Haussler
City Attorney Interim City Clerk

Jay Schengel Thad Avery
Finance Director City Engineer

Sean Smith
Supervising Civil Engineer

Francisco & Associates
Assessment Engineer

361
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2024-25 CERTIFICATES

-iii-

ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF CLOVIS
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE CITY’S
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1

Fiscal Year 2024-25

The undersigned, acting on behalf of Francisco & Associates , respectfully submits the enclosed Engineer's Report as directed by the Clovis City Council pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Article XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution and pursuant to the Charter and Municipal Code of the City of Clovis. The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.

Dated: __March 18, 2024 By:

Ed Espinoza, P.E.

RCE # 40688

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram, thereto attached, was filed with me on the ________day of ____________, 2024.

Andrew Haussler, Interim City Clerk
City of Clovis
Fresno County, California

By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram, thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the Council of the City of Clovis, Fresno County, California, on the ________ day of ____________, 2024, by adoption of Resolution No. _________.

Andrew Haussler, Interim City Clerk
City of Clovis
Fresno County, California

By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram, thereto attached, was filed in my office in the County of Fresno, on the ________ day of ____________, 2024.

Oscar J. Garcia, CPA, Auditor
Fresno County, California

By:
362
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION I
Fiscal Year 2024-25 INTRODUCTION

-1-

SECTION I

INTRODUCTION

ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF CLOVIS
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE CITY’S
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1

Fiscal Year 2024-25

Background Information
To ensure the proper flow of funds for the ongoing operation, maintenance and servicing of specific improvements benefitting properties within the boundaries of the Benefit Assessment District No. 95 -1 (“District”), the City Council, through the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (“1982 Act”), previously approved the formation of the District which includes two (2) benefit areas as described in this Engineer’s Report (“Report”).

Benefit Area I is comprised of the Renaissance development and Benefit Area II is comprised of the Country View development. Street and landscaping i mprovements, which may be constructed, operated, maintained and serviced by the District , include, but are not limited to:

Sidewalks, curb and gutters, drainage inlets, paved sections, valley gutters, four entrance control gates and landscaping located at the Birch Avenue, Chennault Avenue, Oxford Avenue and Dartmouth Avenue entrances, and streetlights located within the boundaries of the District.

As part of their development conditions , the Developer for the District was required to construct improvements which benefit parcels within the District . However, the ongoing operation, maintenance, servicing and capital replacement of these improvements are financed through the levy of assessments on parcels within the District who directly benefit from those improvements.

Current Annual Administration
This Report includes the following for the ensuing fiscal year : (1) a general description of the improvements to be constructed, operated, maintained and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget to construct, operate, maintain and service the improvements, (3) the method used to distribute the costs to the benefiting property owners within the District, (4) a diagram of the District and associated benefit areas, and (5) listing of the proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District.

For Fiscal Year 2024-25, the City Council propos es to increase the maximum annual assessment rate for parcels located within Benefit Area I (Renaissance). The purpose of the proposed assessment rate increase is to keep up with significant increases in maintenance costs , replace the Gate Callbox and Operator, as well as accumulate 363
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION I
Fiscal Year 2024-25 INTRODUCTION

-2-
funds for future sidewalk repairs and street maintenance projects benefitting properties within Benefit Area I (Renaissance).

The proposed assessment rate increase requires the City to conduct Proposition 218 property owner proceedings . The City will mail notices and ballots to the property owners within Benefit Area I ( Renaissance) a minimum of 45 days prior to the Public Hearing set for June 17, 2024. At the Public Hearing, the City will provide an opportunity for any interested person to provide testimony. After the public input portion of the public hearing, the City Council will ask if there are any remaining ballots to be turned in or if anyone wants to change or withdraw their ballot. The ballots will then be tabulated. If a majority of the ballots returned do not oppose the assessment increase, the assessment increase may be approved by City Council for Benefit Area I ( Renaissance). At the conclusion of the Public Hearing on June 17 , 2024, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the Fiscal Year 202 4-25 levy and collection of assessments for both benefit areas as proposed or as modified.

Payment of the annual District assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for the ir annual property taxes. All funds collected through the assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this Report.

364
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 ENGINEER'S REPORT

-3-

SECTION II

ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982
SECTION 54703 THROUGH 54720

OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE

Pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California), and in accordance with Resolution No. 24 - ___ initiating proceedings for the levy and collection of assessments , ordering the preparation of the annual Engineer’s approving the Preliminary Engineer’s Report , and declaring the i ntention for l evy and collection of a ssessments, adopted by the City Council of the City of Clovis , on April 15, 2024, and in connection with the proceedings for:

CITY OF CLOVIS
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1

Herein after referred to as the “ District", I, Ed Espinoza , the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of five (5) parts as follows:

PART A: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

This part describes the improvements to be financed by the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Clovis and are incorporated herein by reference.

PART B: ESTIMATE OF COST

This part contains an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith.

PART C: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM

This part incorporates by reference a diagram of the District showing the boundaries of any benefit areas within the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Fresno County Assessor for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference and made part of this Report.

365
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 ENGINEER'S REPORT

-4-
PART D: METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT

This part contains the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received.

PART E: PROPERTY LIST AND ASSESSMENT ROLL

This part contains a list of the Fresno County Assessor’s parcel numbers, and the amount to be assessed upon the benefited lands within the District. The Assessment Roll is filed in the Office of the Clovis City Clerk and is incorporated in this Report by reference. The list is keyed to the records of the Fresno County Assessor, which are incorporated herein by reference.
366
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART A

-5-
PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The improvements, which have been constructed, and those which may be subsequently constructed, to be oper ated, maintained, and serviced under the District are generally described as follows:

Street and landscaping improvements consisting of, but not limited to , sidewalks, curb and gutters, drainage inlets, paved sections, valley gutters, four entrance control gates and landscaping located at the Birch Avenue, Chennault Avenue, Oxford Avenue and Dartmouth Avenue entrances, and streetlights located within the boundaries of the District.

367
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART C

-6-
PART B

ESTIMATE OF COST

The 1982 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures for the District. The 1982 Act provides that the total cost for the construction, operation, maintenance , and servicing of the street and landscaping improvements can be recovered by the District. Incidental expenses including administration of the District, engineering fees, legal fees and all other costs associated with the District can also be included.

Revenues collected from the assessments within each benefit area shall be used only for the expenditures associated with each benefit area as authorized under the 198 2 Act. Any balance remaining at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

Tables 1 and 2 below provide a summary of the total F iscal Year 2024-25 estimated revenues and expenditures for each benefit area.

For a detailed breakdown on the revenues and expenditures for each benefit area within the District please refer to Appendix "A" and Appendix "B" in this report.

368
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART C

-7-
TABLE NO. 1: BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
BENEFIT AREA I (RENAISSANCE) - PROPOSED $373/YEAR INCREASE Projected Beginning Balance as of July 1, 2024: $5,337
Revenue
Annual Assessments including a $373 increase ($1,020 per Home) $45,900 Total Es timated Revenue for Fis cal Year 2024-25: $51,237 Annual Expenditures (1)
Administrative Expenses (Office Supplies, Postage, etc.) ($600) Telephone Cost ($1,600)
Electronic Gate Maintenance/Repair ($1,400)
Street Sweeping ($700)
Landscape Maintenance & Irrigation Repairs ($8,000)
Electrical Power for Gate and Streetlights ($3,500)
Water Service ($500)
City Administration Costs ($2,000)
County Collection Fees ($8)
District Administrator ($10,000)
Assessment Engineering ($1,600)
Insurance ($1,100)
Annual Expenditures Subtotal: ($31,008)
Capital Improvement Projects
Gate Callbox Replacement ($5,800)
Gate Operator Replacement ($14,356)
Capital Improvement Projects Subtotal: ($20,156)
Total Es timated Expens es for Fis cal Year 2024-25: ($51,164) Estimated Fiscal Year 2024-25 Reserve Collection: ($5,264) Projected Ending Balance as of June 30, 2025: $73
Reserve Detail as of June 30, 2025
Recommended Operating Reserves(2) $15,504
Available Operating Reserves $73
Available Capital Reserves(3) $0
As s es s ment Rate (45 Parcels ) $1,020.00
Notes:
(1) See Appendix "A" for a detailed description of expenses. (2) Operating reserves are needed because the City does not receive the assessment revenue from the County until halfway through the fiscal year. Therefore, it is recommended the City have an operating reserve to fund 6 months of the estimated annual expenditures anticipated to be incurred from July 1 through December 31 of each fiscal year.
(3) Capital reserve funds will be used for Capital Improvement Projects or to replace existing improvements once they have reached the end of their useful life. 369
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART C

-8-
Projected Beginning Balance as of July 1, 2024: $30,383 Revenue
Annual Assessments $47,790
Total Es timated Revenue for Fis cal Year 2024-25: $78,173 Annual Expenditures (1)
Administrative Expenses (Office Supplies, Postage, etc.) ($700) Telephone Cost ($1,600)
Electronic Gate Maintenance/Repair ($1,600)
Street Sweeping ($2,200)
Landscape Maintenance & Irrigation Repairs ($8,500)
Electrical Power for Gate and Streetlights ($5,500)
Water Service ($400)
City Administration Costs ($3,200)
County Collection Fees ($14)
District Administrator ($16,600)
Assessment Engineering ($2,800)
Insurance ($1,800)
Annual Expenditures Subtotal: ($44,914)
Capital Improvement Projects
Gate Callbox Upgrade ($2,200)
Capital Improvement Projects Subtotal: ($2,200)
Total Es timated Expens es for Fis cal Year 2024-25: ($47,114) Estimated Fiscal Year 2024-25 Reserve Collection: $676
Projected Ending Balance as of June 30, 2025: $31,059
Reserve Detail as of June 30, 2025
Recommended Operating Reserves(2) $22,457
Available Operating Reserves $22,457
Available Capital Reserves(3) $8,602
As s es s ment Rate (81 Parcels ) $590.00
Notes:
(1) See Appendix "B" for a detailed description of expenses. (2) Operating reserves are needed because the City does not receive the assessment revenue from the County until halfway through the fiscal year. Therefore, it is recommended the City have an operating reserve to fund 6 months of the estimated annual expenditures anticipated to be incurred from July 1 through December 31 of each fiscal year.
(3) Capital reserve funds will be used for Capital Improvement Projects or to replace existing improvements once they have reached the end of their useful life.

TABLE NO. 2: BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

BENEFIT AREA II (COUNTRY VIEW)

370
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART C

-9-
PART C

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM

The boundary of the District is completely within the boundaries of the City of Clovis .

The Assessment Diagram for the two benefit areas is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Clovis and is shown on the following page of this Report. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Fresno County Assessor, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.

371
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Birch Ave
Oxford Ave
Harvard Ave
Dartmouth Ave
Oak Ave
Minarets Ave
M
innewawa Ave
Park Creek Dr
Alluvial Ave
Legend
Street Lights
Electronic Gates
Benefit Assessment District Boundary
Landscape Maintenance Areas
Street Maintenance Areas
Parcel Lines
City of Clovis
Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Maintenance Improvement Diagram

BENEFIT

AREA II

BENEFIT
AREA I
±
0 200 400 600 Feet
Chennault Ave
N MinnewawaAve
372
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D

-11-
PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT

This section explains the benefits to property from the street and landscaping improvements and the methodology used to apportion the costs to the benefiting properties within the District.

Discussion of Special Benefit
Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, permits the establishment of assessment districts by local a gencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements and services which include the construction, operation, maintenance , and servicing of street and landscaping improvements.

Section 54711 of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 requires that assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to property value. This Section states:

“The amount of the assessment imposed on any parcel of property shall be related to the benefit to the parcel which will be derived from the provision of the service.”

In addition, the 1982 Act permits the designation of zones or areas of benefit within any individual assessment district.

Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property.

“No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”

Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional activities.

Special versus General Benefit
In the absence of an annual assessment, the street and landscaping maintenance activities within each benefit area of the District would not be provided. All the assessment proceeds received from each benefit area will be utilized to fund the cost of 373
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D

-12-
providing a level of tangible “special benefits” in the form of property related services which benefit the individual properties with the District . The assessments are also structured to provide specific i mprovements within each benefit area that are of specific and special benefit to property within each benefit area.

The street and landscaping improvements in each benefit area of the District were specifically designed and constructed to provide vehicular access to properties within the respective benefit areas, and not the public at large. The boundaries of the benefit areas have been delineated to include only those parcels that receive a direct benefit from the street and landscaping improvements. Properties located outside the District benefit areas and the public at large do not benefit from th e District street and landscaping improvements.

It is therefore concluded that all street and landscaping maintenance activities funded by the District are of special benefit to the benefiting properties located within the respective benefit areas of the District, and the value of the special benefits to property reasonably exceeds the assessment for every assessed parcel in the District . In other words, as required by Proposition 218: the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel does not exceed the amount of the assessments.

Assessment Methodology

Proposition 218 requires that assessments must be based on the benefit the subject properties receive from the improvements being maintained. The improvements maintained by the District provide vehicular access and enhanced aesthetics to the properties within the District.

Each year, the City shall evaluate the conditions of the improvements to be maintained by the District and estimate the required maintenance and incidental costs to spread to the benefiting properties. A portion of the assessments collected may be set aside for significant capital improvement items, such as seal coats and street surface overlays.

The single- family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for the calculation of assessments since it represents all the assessable parcels within the District. All single-family residential parcels have been determined to experience equal vehicular access and enhanced aesthetics from the District street and landscaping improvements. There are 45 single-family residential parcels in Benefit Area I (Renaissance) and 81 single-family residential parcels in Benefit Area I I (Country View) that will be assessed for the maintenance of the improvements. Therefore, th e maintenance and incidental costs for Benefit Area I (Renaissance) will be equally spread t o each of the single -family residential parcels within Benefit Area I (Renaissance) and the maintenance and incidental costs for Benefit Area II (Country View) will be equally spread t o each of the single-family residential parcels within Benefit Area II (Country View).

374
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART D

-13-
Below is a description of each of the benefit areas, their corresponding number and type of parcels within each benefit area, and the method of apportioning the costs of the District street and landscaping improvements to the benefiting parcels.

Benefit Area I (Renaissance)

Benefit Area I (Renaissance) is comprised of 45 single- family residential parcels.

The total assessment revenue needed for Fiscal Year 2024 -25 to operate and maintain the improvements benefitting Benefit Area I (Renaissance) i s $45,900 , which requires an annual assessment increase of $373 per single- family residential parcel. Therefore, the City will conduct Proposition 218 proceedings to obtain approval from Benefit Area I (Renaissance) property owners to increase annual maximum assessments to $1,020 per single -family residential parcel commencing with Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Also, t he City proposes an annual increase of $55.00 (approximately 5%) to the maximum assessment from Fiscal Year 2025- 26 through Fiscal Year 20 28-29 to keep up with inflationary increases in maintenance costs , accumulate funds for necessary repairs and capital improvement projects , and avoid incurring costs associated with Proposition 218 proceedings for at least the next 5 years . The table below provides a summary of the proposed annual maximum assessments for Fiscal Year 2024- 25 through Fiscal Year 2028- 29 pending property owner approval . The annual maximum assessment will remain at $1,240.00 per Single-Family Residential Parcel following Fiscal Year 2028- 29 until another assessment increase is approved by Benefit Area I (Renaissance) property owners.

Fiscal
Year

Assessment
per Single-Family
Residential Parcel
2024-25 $1,020.00
2025-26 $1,075.00
2026-27 $1,130.00
2027-28 $1,185.00
2028-29 $1,240.00

Benefit Area II (Country View)

Benefit Area II (Country View) is comprised of 81 single- family residential parcels.

The total assessment revenue needed for Fiscal Year 2024 -25 to operate and maintain the improvements benefitting Benefit Area II (Country View) is $47,790.

This results in an assessment of $590.00 per Single- Family Residential Parcel that will be levied within Benefit Area II (Country View) for Fiscal Year 2024-25. 375
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2024-25 PART E

-14-
PART E

PROPERTY LIST AND ASSESSMENT ROLL

A list of the addresses of all parcels, and the description of each lot or parcel within the District is shown on the last equalized p roperty tax roll of the Fresno County Assessor, which by reference is hereby made a part of this Report.

This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll, which includes the assessments apportioned to each lot or parcel. The Assessment Roll is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Clovis and is shown in this Report as Appendix “C”.

376
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2024-25 APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A

DETAILED STATEMENT OF COSTS FOR

BENEFIT AREA I (RENAISSANCE)

377
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2024-25 APPENDIX A

A - 1

BENEFIT AREA I (RENAISSANCE)

DETAILED STATEMENT OF COSTS

The detailed description of costs for each of the improvements to be operated, maintained, and serviced in Benefit Area I (Renaissance), and those which may be subsequently operated, maintained, and serviced are generally described as follows:

Administrative Expenses

This item encompasses office expenses, postage, and printing that arises during the fiscal year described as follows:
• Office Expenses related to providing information for City Council meetings, quarterly financial reports to the City of Clovis, etc. • Postage for mailings of bills/invoices, checks to vendors, and community notices. • Printing of invoices, notices, announcements, reports, etc.

Based on historical data, the above-mentioned expenses are estimated to be $600 for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Telephone Costs

Telephone costs correspond to monthly landline charges for the callbox located at the entrance gate which will be used by people at the gate to communicate with residents of Benefit Area I (Renaissance).

There are two gates. One gate is an "Enter Only" gate and the other is an "Exit Only" gate. There is only one telephone to be maintained at the "Enter Only" gate.

The telephone system is a private system and the cost for repair and replacement of the telephone equipment, when needed, will be paid from the capital reserve fund. The estimated cost to fund minor telephone repairs and AT&T billing is $1,600 for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Electronic Gate Maintenance

There are two electronic gates that will be maintained by Benefit Area I (Renaissance) .

The estimated cost for electronic gate maintenance for Fiscal Year 2024 -25 is $1,400 and funds costs related to drive- thru and pedestrian gate repairs and monthly maintenance.

378
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2024-25 APPENDIX A

A - 2
Street Sweeping

The streets will be swept once every two months within Benefit Area I (Renaissance) for an estimated cost of $700 for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Landscape Maintenance and Irrigation Repairs

The landscape services provided include monthly routine maintenance, fertilization, rye seeding, minor irrigation and sprinkler repairs, seasonal flowers at the gate entrance area, tree trimming as needed, and landscaping supplies.

The landscape maintenance areas for Benefit Area I (Renaissance) are located at the entrance gates off of Minnewawa Avenue and include maintenance of the following:

- median island planters along Chennault Avenue;
- landscape strips between sidewalk and curb along Chennault Avenue; - entrance area north and south of Chennault Avenue expanding from the sound walls between the gates and Minnewawa Avenue; and - landscape area located at the intersection of Minnewawa Avenue and Birch Avenue.

The total area of landscaping to be maintained i s approximately 3,700 square feet and is shown on the Assessment District Diagram included in Part C of Part C of this Report.

The total cost of landscape maintenance and minor irrigation and sprinkler repairs for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is estimated by the District Administrator to be $8,000.

Electrical Power for Gate and Streetlights

The total estimated cost for electrical power charges for gate operations and streetlights for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is $3,500.

Water Service

The estimated cost to provide water service for common areas associated with Benefit Area I (Renaissance) for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is $500.

City Administration Costs

The City of Clovis will have many responsibilities for the administration of the District.

Included in these costs are:

a. City Council Costs related to notices, hearings, etc. b. Attorney fees for the City Attorney to prepare the legal documents as are required for the operation of the District.
379
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2024-25 APPENDIX A

A - 3
c. Staff time for the preparation of documents necessary for the on- going operation of the District.
d. Staff time for the review of documents prepared by Di strict Consultants as necessary for the on-going operations of the District.
e. Staff time related to the timely application of neces sary maintenance and repairs as required.

Historically, the City of Clovis has assessed minimal charges to the District for their services. The est imated cost for Benefit Area I (Renaissance) City Administration for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is $2,000.

County Collection Fees

The costs from the County of Fresno related to the collection of assessments and transfer of funds to the City are $0.17 per parcel.

The total estimated cost for the County of Fresno collection fees for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is $8 (45 parcels x $0.17/parcel).

District Administrator

The District Administrator will provide administrative, financial, and operational services to manage the maintenance of improvements for Benefit Area I (Renaissance) . The estimated cost for Benefit Area I (Renaissance) Administration is $ 10,000 for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Assessment Engineering

The District Assessment Engineer is Francisco & Associates. They have a contract with the District to perform Benefit Area I (Renaissance) assessment engineering services for a lump sum of $1,600 for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Insurance Costs

The District will carry property damage insurance for damage to the gates caused by an accident or vandalism and Comprehensive General Liability Insurance with Excess Coverage.

The property insurance is issued by State Farm Insurance Company. It provides for a maximum of $80,000 per occurrence for damage to the electronic gates with a $1,0 00 deductible.

The Comprehensive Liability Insurance is issued by State Farm Insurance Company, which has the following coverage:

380
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2024-25 APPENDIX A

A - 4
$3,000,000 General Aggregate
$3,000,000 Each Occurrence
$3,000,000 Personal Injury
$50,000 Fire Damage Legal Liability

The total estimated insurance cost or all insurance coverage as required for private gated communities including property and liability insurance for Fiscal Year 202 4-25 is $1,100.

Capital Reserve

On the recommendation of the District Administrator and the City of Clovis Finance Department, the Capital Reserve was established to provide funding for future expenses that do not occur on an annual basis.

Included in the Capital Reserve are funds set aside for items including, but not limited to, roadway slurry seal maintenance, sidewalk repairs, gate repairs, and landscape upgrades.

The City of Clovis has recently completed or intends on completing the capital improvement projects shown below.

Capital Improvement Projects

Upon evaluation of current improvements and their remaining useful life, the City of Clovis and District Administrator assessed a need to utilize Capital Reserve to fund capital improvement projects.

Assuming property owners approve the proposed assessment increase commencing with Fiscal Year 2024 -25, the City of Clovis and District Administrator anticipate the following capital improvement projects during Fiscal Year 2024-25:

a. Gate Callbox Replacement ($5,800)
b. Gate Operator Replacement ($14,356)

381
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2023-24 APPENDIX B

APPENDIX B

DETAILED STATEMENT OF COSTS FOR

BENEFIT AREA II (COUNTRY VIEW)

382
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2023-24 APPENDIX B

B - 1

BENEFIT AREA II (COUNTRY VIEW)

DETAILED STATEMENT OF COSTS

The detailed description of costs for each of the improvements to be operated, maintained, and serviced in Benefit Area I I (Country View) , and those which may be subsequently operated, maintained, and serviced are generally described as follows:

Administrative Expenses

Based on historical data, the above- mentioned expenses are estim ated to be $ 700 for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Telephone Costs

Telephone costs correspond to monthly landline charges for the callbox located at the entrance gate which will be used by people at the gate to communicate with residents of the Benefit Area II (Country View).

There are two gates. One gate is an "Enter Only" gate and the other is an "Exit Only" gate. There is only one telephone to be maintained at the "Enter Only" gate.

The telephone system is a private system and the cost for repair and replacement of the telephone equipment, when needed, will be paid from the capital reserve fund. The estimated cost to fund telephone equipment repairs and AT&T billing is $1,600 for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Electronic Gate Maintenance

There are two electronic gates that will be maintained by Benefit Area II (Country View) .

The estimated cost for electronic gate maintenance for Fiscal Year 2024 -25 is $1,600 and funds costs related to drive- thru and pedestrian gate repairs and monthly maintenance.

383
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2023-24 APPENDIX B

B - 2
Street Sweeping

The streets will be swept once every month within Benefit Area II (Country View) for an estimated cost of $2,200 for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Landscape Maintenance and Irrigation Repairs

The landscape services provided include monthly routine maintenance, fertilization, r ye seeding, minor irrigation and sprinkler repairs, seasonal flowers at the gate entrance area, tree trimming as needed, and landscaping supplies.

The landscape maintenance areas of Benefit Area II (Country View) are located at the entrance gates off of Alluvial Avenue and of the back gate on Dartmouth Avenue. The maintenance areas include the following:

- median island planters located at the entrance gates on Alluvial Avenue; - landscape strips between sidewalk and curb at the entrance gates on Alluvial Avenue;
- the entrance area north and south of Oxford Avenue expanding from the sound walls between the gates and Alluvial Avenue;
- turf area on the west side of Dartmouth Avenue between Oak Avenue and the gate; and
- entrance area on Alluvial Avenue, expanding between Dartmouth Avenue and the sound wall bordering Benefit Area II.

The total area of landscaping to be maintained is approximately 5,000 square feet and is shown on the Assessment District Diagram included in Part C of this Report.

The total cost of landscape maintenance and minor irrigation and sprinkler repairs for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is estimated by the District Administrator to be $8,500.

Electrical Power for Gate and Streetlights

The total estimated cost for electrical power charges for gate operations and streetlights for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is $5,500.

Water Service

The estimated cost to provide water service for common areas associated with Benefit Area II (Country View) for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is $400.

City Administration Costs

The City of Clovis will have many responsibilities for the administration of the District.

Included in these costs are:
384
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2023-24 APPENDIX B

B - 3
a. City Council Costs related to notices, hearings, etc. b. Attorney fees for the City Attorney to prepare the legal documents as are required for the operation of the District.
c. Staff time for the preparation of documents necessary for the on- going operation of the District.
d. Staff time for the review of documents prepared by District Consultants as necessary for the on-going operations of the District.
e. Staff time related to the timely application of necessary maintenance and repairs as required.

Historically, the City of Clovis has assessed minimal charges to the District for their services. The estimated cost for Benefit Area II (Country View) City Administration for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is $3,200.

County Collection Fees

The costs from the County of Fresno related to the collection of assessments and transfer of funds to the City is $0.17 per parcel.

The total estimated cost for the County of Fresno collection fees for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is $14 (81 parcels x $0.17/parcel).

District Administrator

The District Administrator will provide administrative, financial, and operational services to manage the maintenance of improvements for Benefit Area II (Country View) . The estimated cost for Benefit Area II (Country View) Administration is $ 16,600 for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Assessment Engineering

The District Assessment Engineer is Francisco & Associates. They have a contract with the District to perform Benefit Area II (Country View) assessment engineering services for a lump sum of $2,800 for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Insurance Costs

The District will carry property damage insurance for damage to the gates caused by an accident or vandalism and Comprehensive General Liability Insurance with Excess Coverage.

The property insurance is issued by State Farm Insurance Company. It provides for a maximum of $80,000 per occurrence for damage to the electronic gates with a $1,000 deductible.

385
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2023-24 APPENDIX B

B - 4
The Comprehensive Liability Insurance is issued by State Farm Insurance Company, which has the following coverage:
$3,000,000 General Aggregate
$3,000,000 Each Occurrence
$3,000,000 Personal Injury
$50,000 Fire Damage Legal Liability

The total estimated insurance cost or all insurance coverage as required for private gated communities including property and liability insurance for Fiscal Year 202 4-25 is $1,800.

Capital Reserve

Included in the Capital Reserve are funds set aside for items including, but not limited to, roadway slurry seal maintenance, sidewalk repairs, gate repairs, and landscape upgrades.

The City of Clovis has recently completed or intends on completing the capital improvement projects shown below.

Capital Improvement Projects

Upon evaluation of current improvements and their remaining useful life, the City of Clovis and District Administrator assessed a need to utilize Capital Reserves to fund capital improvement projects.

The City of Clovis and District Administrator anticipate the following capital improvement projects during Fiscal Year 2024-25:

a. Gate Callbox Upgrade with cellular module ($2,200)
386
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2024-25 APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

ASSESSMENT ROLL

387
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

CITY OF CLOVIS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1995-1
(Blackhorse Estates)
Assessment Roll
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Benefit Area
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Assessment
Amount
Benefit
Area
Property
Owner
Property
Address
1 Tract
and Lot
562-151-08 $1,020.001 NISHIMURA GAREY 25 CHENNAULT AVE TR 4299 Lot 1 562-151-09 $1,020.001 REED SAMUEL H 45 CHENNAULT AVE TR 4299 Lot 2 562-151-10 $1,020.001 ANTARAMIAN PETER 65 CHENNAULT AVE TR 4299 Lot 3 562-151-11 $1,020.001 TWEDT BRIAN D & VICKIE L 85 CHENNAULT AVE TR 4299 Lot 4 562-151-12 $1,020.001 SYVERTSEN WILLIAM & CHERYLE L FAM TRUST 105 CHENNAULT AVE TR 4299 Lot 5 562-151-13 $1,020.001 HSIAO PAUL SHIHYEN & HSIN-CHING LIN 125 CHENNAULT AVE TR 4299 Lot 6 562-152-04 $1,020.001 NIMERI ABDELRAHMAN & SHAIMA 650 N CHERRY LN TR 4299 Lot 41 562-152-05 $1,020.001 SRA FAMILY 640 N CHERRY LN TR 4299 Lot 40 562-152-06 $1,020.001 DUNMORE JAMES L JR & TRACEE L 42 CHENNAULT AVE TR 4299 Lot 43 562-152-07 $1,020.001 HSIAO PAUL S 62 CHENNAULT AVE TR 4299 Lot 42 562-153-03 $1,020.001 TAKEDA VICTOR K & ANNE M TRUSTEES 665 N CHERRY LN TR 4299 Lot 18 562-153-04 $1,020.001 SIRIMARCO JAMES V III & DONNA M 655 N CHERRY LN TR 4299 Lot 19 562-153-05 $1,020.001 ROBERTSON STEPHEN W JR 635 N CHERRY LN TR 4299 Lot 20 562-153-06 $1,020.001 STAFFORD FRANKLIN H 611 N CHERRY LN TR 4299 Lot 21 562-153-07 $1,020.001 BIGLIERI JULIE M TRS 601 N CHERRY LN TR 4299 Lot 22 562-153-13 $1,020.001 KALMES BEAU AARON & BRITTANY STOKER 624 N OXFORD AVE TR 4299 Lot 12 562-153-14 $1,020.001 CHAVEZ MANUEL A & ROSSANNE C TRS 634 N OXFORD AVE TR 4299 Lot 13 562-153-15 $1,020.001 BURRI CHRISTINE ISKENDERIAN 644 N OXFORD AVE TR 4299 Lot 14 562-153-16 $1,020.001 SHIDIYWAH SAIF & HUDA 664 N OXFORD AVE TR 4299 Lot 15 562-153-17 $1,020.001 STAWARSKI DOUGLAS P & KAKELLY 684 N OXFORD AVE TR 4299 Lot 16 562-153-18 $1,020.001 LEE JOSEPH & MIN HEE 102 CHENNAULT AVE TR 4299 Lot 17 562-153-19 $1,020.001 CLARK JASON 614 N OXFORD AVE TR 4299 Lot 11 562-153-20 $1,020.001 JENSEN LAUREN 651 N OXFORD AVE TR 4299 Lot 10 562-153-21 $1,020.001 TILLEY SHARRON F TRUSTEE 671 N OXFORD AVE TR 4299 Lot 9 562-153-22 $1,020.001 SHARMA VISHAL & SHILPA 691 N OXFORD AVE TR 4299 Lot 8 562-153-23 $1,020.001 BROBST JAMES H & M ARLENE TRUSTEES 711 N OXFORD AVE TR 4299 Lot 7 562-153-24 $1,020.001 GILL SHERAZ 731 N OXFORD AVE Por of Lot 6 Clovis 562-161-01 $1,020.001 GANDY ANN TRUSTEE 610 N CHERRY LN TR 4299 Lot 37 562-161-02 $1,020.001 HEMMAN RONALD D & STEPHANIE J 620 N CHERRY LN TR 4299 Lot 38 562-161-03 $1,020.001 IBRAHIMI HARIS & MALALAI ZOLTANI 630 N CHERRY LN TR 4299 Lot 39 562-161-04 $1,020.001 GATES GINGER G 57 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 36 562-161-05 $1,020.001 O HARA MICHAEL & CYNTHIA 55 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 35 562-161-06 $1,020.001 DER HAROUTUNIAN VASKEN & LINA TRS 51 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 34 562-161-07 $1,020.001 YANG YIA 47 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 33 562-161-08 $1,020.001 HAMILTON BRENDA S 37 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 32 562-162-01 $1,020.001 TSAO DEREK & MONICA DU 94 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 23 562-162-02 $1,020.001 KHAN SAMIA 84 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 24 562-162-03 $1,020.001 CARUSO HILDA M 74 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 25 1C -
388
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

CITY OF CLOVIS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1995-1
(Blackhorse Estates)
Assessment Roll
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Benefit Area
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Assessment
Amount
Benefit
Area
Property
Owner
Property
Address
1 Tract
and Lot
562-162-04 $1,020.001 BRONSON JAMES C & MICHELLE L 64 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 26 562-162-05 $1,020.001 HARDIN TAYLOR J & TETYANA S 54 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 27 562-162-06 $1,020.001 WEBER DAVID & MICHELLE 44 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 28 562-162-07 $1,020.001 THACKER BARBARA J TRUSTEE 34 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 29 562-162-08 $1,020.001 DOUGHERTY STEPHEN P & MONICA 24 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 30 562-162-09 $1,020.001 ROSENTHAL STEVE ANDREW 14 BIRCH AVE TR 4299 Lot 31 562-180-45 $1,020.001 GOTTLIEB DAVID ANDREW & VIRGINIA TRS 741 N OXFORD AVE TR 4668 Lot 18 45 $45,900.00TOTAL:
2C -
389
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

CITY OF CLOVIS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1995-1
(Blackhorse Estates)
Assessment Roll
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Benefit Area
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Assessment
Amount
Benefit
Area
Property
Owner
Property
Address
2 Tract
and Lot
562-153-25 $590.002 KUHL MICHAEL B 732 N HARVARD AVE TR 4661 Lot 28 562-153-26 $590.002 KEMP TIMOTHY F & SAUNDRA D 722 N HARVARD AVE TR 4661 Lot 27 562-153-27 $590.002 KONSTANZER KEVIN C & PAMELA S TRUSTEES 712 N HARVARD AVE TR 4661 Lot 26 562-153-28 $590.002 WEAVER JAMES & LISA TRUSTEES 692 N HARVARD AVE TR 4661 Lot 25 562-153-29 $590.002 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC 672 N HARVARD AVE TR 4661 Lot 24 562-153-30 $590.002 MAKEL JOHN T & RAQUEL 204 BIRCH AVE TR 4661 Lot 23 562-153-31 $590.002 HIRATA RYEN J & ERICA R JOHNSON TRS 214 BIRCH AVE TR 4661 Lot 22 562-153-32 $590.002 TURNBULL BRENT L & PATRICIA K TRS 234 BIRCH AVE TR 4661 Lot 21 562-153-33 $590.002 TRIFFON GARRETT 264 BIRCH AVE TR 4661 Lot 20 562-153-34 $590.002 AYDINYAN ARA 284 BIRCH AVE TR 4661 Lot 19 562-153-35 $590.002 ORTIZ KIRA 647 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 18 562-153-36 $590.002 L RODRIGUEZ R & T 667 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 17 562-153-37 $590.002 BICKEL BRUCE D TRUSTEE 687 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 16 562-153-38 $590.002 HOLGUIN GIL & KIM A 707 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 15 562-153-39 $590.002 MARTIN DARRELL B TRUSTEE 717 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 14 562-153-40 $590.002 ANALLA BRYAN G & MOLLY BLISS 727 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 13 562-153-41 $590.002 GUISTO NANCY A 737 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 12 562-155-01 $590.002 GATTIE BRADLEY H & KIRSTEN ANN TRS 673 N HARVARD AVE TR 4661 Lot 29 562-155-02 $590.002 GRAY LAURIE J & RANDALL M 676 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 30 562-155-03 $590.002 BREWER ADRIANNE M PETRUTIS & SCOTT M 696 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 31 562-155-04 $590.002 SLICK LEON H & SANDRA K 716 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 32 562-155-05 $590.002 HUDSON KIMBERLY SUE 726 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 33 562-155-06 $590.002 LEACH RONALD P & TRACY A 736 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 34 562-180-01 $590.002 KAHAL AMANDEEP 149 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 1 562-180-02 $590.002 MAINOCK RALPH H TRS 129 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 2 562-180-03 $590.002 ALCONCHER RONALD B & ANNA C TRS 99 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 3 562-180-04 $590.002 LOYD WILLIAM D & CYNTHIA L 89 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 4 562-180-05 $590.002 WALTER LOGAN PATRICK 69 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 5 562-180-06 $590.002 NOEL MIKE & TIFFANY 49 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 6 562-180-07 $590.002 DINATA VERONICA M & ANTONIUS J TRS 790 N CHERRY LN TR 4668 Lot 7 562-180-08 $590.002 THOMPSON CRAIG 780 N CHERRY LN TR 4668 Lot 8 562-180-09 $590.002 RATZLAFF CHRISTOPHER 770 N CHERRY LN TR 4668 Lot 9 562-180-10 $590.002 SILVA ANNA 760 N CHERRY LN TR 4668 Lot 10 562-180-11 $590.002 KATEIAN JANICE L TRS 750 N CHERRY LN TR 4668 Lot 11 562-180-12 $590.002 WESSON SANDRA C TRUSTEE 26 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 12 562-180-13 $590.002 LALLY GREGORY W & GRACE K TRUSTEES 46 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 13 562-180-14 $590.002 KEITH DIANA 66 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 14 562-180-15 $590.002 STONECIPHER KAREN TRUSTEE 86 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 15 3C -
390
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

CITY OF CLOVIS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1995-1
(Blackhorse Estates)
Assessment Roll
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Benefit Area
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Assessment
Amount
Benefit
Area
Property
Owner
Property
Address
2 Tract
and Lot
562-180-19 $590.002 HOLTERMANN DARRIN PAUL & JENNIFER LEE 742 N HARVARD AVE TR 4668 Lot 19 562-180-20 $590.002 KARST DENNIS S & KATHERINE TRUSTEES 693 N HARVARD AVE TR 4668 Lot 20 562-180-21 $590.002 REY STEVEN F & JULIE L TRUSTEES 713 N HARVARD AVE TR 4668 Lot 21 562-180-22 $590.002 RAMOS STEPHEN A & JACQUELINE R 723 N HARVARD AVE TR 4668 Lot 22 562-180-23 $590.002 CAMPOS LILIA & ALEJANDRO 733 N HARVARD AVE TR 4668 Lot 23 562-180-24 $590.002 DU BOIS DIANE D 743 N HARVARD AVE TR 4668 Lot 24 562-180-25 $590.002 MORRIS ROGER GARY & ZENAIDA MAPANAO 753 N HARVARD AVE TR 4668 Lot 25 562-180-26 $590.002 KERN ANDREW C & NATALIE A TRS 197 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 26 562-180-27 $590.002 MORROW JOELENE ANN 187 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 27 562-180-28 $590.002 STANLEY MATTHEW 177 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 28 562-180-29 $590.002 CINO JOHN C 157 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 29 562-180-30 $590.002 DELCAMPO JANELLE MARIE 137 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 30 562-180-31 $590.002 OPIE SARA JOAN TRUSTEE 117 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 31 562-180-32 $590.002 RALEY EVELYN 97 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 32 562-180-33 $590.002 SCHARF DONALD R & DOROTHY D SPENCER 77 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 33 562-180-34 $590.002 BESTON LAURENCE O & MARYBETH TRS 57 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lot 34 562-180-35 $590.002 DUCAR FRANK LEROY & GINNIE ILENE TRS 58 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 35 562-180-36 $590.002 HOFER FERDINAND & ANTJE TRUSTEES 78 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 36 562-180-37 $590.002 JACKSON LEANNE RAE TRUSTEE 98 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 37 562-180-38 $590.002 BELLOW CHERYL 118 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 38 562-180-39 $590.002 DANSBY PAUL 138 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 39 562-180-40 $590.002 CENTRAL PACIFIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION 158 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 40 562-180-41 $590.002 KRUEGER TIMOTHY K 178 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 41 562-180-42 $590.002 HULL HARLAN & ROBIN 188 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 42 562-180-43 $590.002 DEWEY CARL C 198 OAK AVE TR 4668 Lot 43 562-180-44 $590.002 HAMES KENT L TRUSTEE 106 MINARETS AVE TR 4668 Lots 16 & 17 562-180-46 $590.002 MANALANSAN EDUARDO L & ROSEMARIE M 179 OAK AVE TR 4661 Lot 1 562-180-47 $590.002 AULT PHILIP H & COLLEEN K 189 OAK AVE TR 4661 Lot 2 562-180-48 $590.002 HAUS SPENCER N & CATHLEEN J 219 OAK AVE TR 4661 Lot 3 562-180-49 $590.002 BREWER RANDALL C & CHERI L TRUSTEES 249 OAK AVE TR 4661 Lot 4 562-180-50 $590.002 ENG MICHAEL S & PEARL K MA TRUSTEES 269 OAK AVE TR 4661 Lot 5 562-180-51 $590.002 KUYPER JASON J 797 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 6 562-180-52 $590.002 LOPEZ EMILIO & CRISTINA 787 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 7 562-180-53 $590.002 BESECKER RICHARD A & MARCIE E TRS 777 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 8 562-180-54 $590.002 WILLIAMS RICHARD E & LOLA T TRS 767 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 9 562-180-55 $590.002 STUEBNER KRIS & PRISCILLA 757 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 10 562-180-56 $590.002 CRUZ RAMIRO 747 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 11 562-180-57 $590.002 HOODE SUMANGALI 746 N DARTMOUTH AVE TR 4661 Lot 35 4C -
391
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Benefit Assessment Area 1
Benefit Assessment Area 2
Alluvial Ave
N M
innewawa Ave
Athens Ave
Oak Ave
N Villa Ave
N Dartm
outh Ave
Park Creek Dr
Minarets Ave
W Alluvial Ave
Chennault Ave
N O
xford Ave
N De W
itt Ave
Bedford Ave
N Harvard Ave
N Cherry Ln
W Athens Ave
Birch Ave
W Bedford Ave
W Decatur Ave
N Perry Ave
N Fairfax Ave
Spruce Ave
N De W
itt Ave
N Harvard Ave
N De W
itt Ave
N Harvard Ave
N Cherry Ln
Park Creek Dr
N Minnewawa Ave
Bedford Ave
N O
xford Ave
N Harvard Ave
Bedford Ave
Athens Ave
Park Creek Dr
N Cherry Ln
Birch Ave
Copyright nearmap 2015
O
1 " = 300 ' 5/28/2020
Assessment District 95-1
Attachment 3
ATTACHEMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 1
5/01/2023
Attachment 3 393
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Administration
DATE: April 15, 2024
SUBJECT: Consider Approval - Res. 24-___, Approving the Sale and Transfer of interest in K & M Casinos, Inc., (500 Club Casino located at 771 W. Shaw Ave, Clovis, CA 93612 ) from Michael Leblanc to Richard Barclay and Mark English.

Staff: John Holt, City Manager
Recommendation: Approve

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution

2. Staff Report dated January 8, 2018 (less attachments)

RECOMMENDATION
For the City Council to approve a resolution approving the sale and transfer of interest in K & M Casinos, Inc., from Michael Leblanc to Richard Barclay and Mark English.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Attachment 1 is the draft resolution from staff recommending Council approv al related to the sale and transfer of interest in K & M Casinos, Inc. , from Michael Leblanc to Richard Barclay and Mark English. Attachment 2 provides background for the 500 Club Casino over the past 15 years. In 2018 Council approved the sale of the 500 Club from Louis Sarantos to K & M Casinos, at the time, owned by Michael LeBlanc and Richard (“Kevin”) Barclay.

In April 2022, Michael LeBlanc, Kevin Barclay, and Mark English entered into an agreement where Michael LeBlanc agreed to sell all of his 50 percent interest in K & M Casinos, Inc. , to Kevin Barclay and Mark English. In October 2022, the California Gambling Control Commission approved the agreement. T he Clovis Municipal Code permit s the sale and/or transfer of an interest in a licensed gaming club with approval of the City Council . Staff is recommending Council approve the sale and transfer.

394
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.

Page | 2

BACKGROUND
On January 8, 2018, the City Council approved and issued a Card Room License fo r the operation of a licensed gaming club called the Clovis 500 Club (771 W Shaw Ave, Clovis, CA 93612) to K & M Casinos, Inc., a California Corporation which at the time was jointly owned by Michael LeBlanc and Richard (“Kevin”) Barclay, who each held an equal 50 percent ownership interest. On January 10, 2019, K & M Casinos, Inc. , changed the name of the Clovis 500 Club to 500 Club Casino with the approval of the California Gambling Control Commission (“Commission”).

On April 26, 2022, Michael LeBlanc, Kevin Barclay, and Mark English entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) whereby Michael LeBlanc agreed to sell all of his 50 percent interest in K & M Casinos, Inc. , to Kevin Barclay and Mark English, with each receiving a 25 percent interest, resulting in Kevin Barclay owning 75 percent, and Mark English owning 25 percent, of K & M Casinos, Inc. On October 20, 2022, the Commission approved the Purchase Agreement.

Section 5.6.25 of the Clovis Municipal Code permits the sale and/or t ransfer of an interest in a licensed gaming club with prior approval of the City Council. The Clovis Police Department has performed background checks on Kevin Barclay and Mark English, and performed other due diligence in evaluating whether the City Council should approve the sale and transfer of interest in K & M Casinos, Inc., in accordance with the Purchase Agreement.

The Police Chief and City Administration recommend the City Council waive any procedural irregularities in the order by which K & M Cas inos, Inc. , obtained approval of the Purchase Agreement and associated sale and transfer of interest in K & M Casinos, Inc., and approve such sale and transfer, subject to the conditions set forth in the attached resolution.

FISCAL IMPACT
The sale and transfer will not have a fiscal impact on the City.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
Council approval of the resolution will formally recognize the agreement where Michael LeBlanc agreed to sell all of his 50 percent interest in K & M Casinos, Inc. , to Kevin Barclay and Mark English, with each receiving a 25 percent interest, resulting in Kevin Barclay owning 75 percent, and Mark English owning 25 percent, of K & M Casinos, Inc.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will implement Council direction.

Prepared by: John Holt, City Manager

Reviewed by: City Manager JH
395
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 24-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS
APPROVING SALE AND TRANSFER OF INTEREST IN K & M CASINOS, INC., FROM

MICHAEL LEBLANC TO RICHARD BARCLAY AND MARK ENGLISH

WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 5.6 of the Clovis Municipal Code, on January 8, 2018, the City Council approved and issued a Card Room License for the operation of a licensed gaming club called the Clovis 500 Club to K & M Casinos, Inc., a California Corporation, which at the time was jointly owned by Michael LeBlanc and Richard (“Kevin”) Barclay, who each held an equal 50 percent ownership interest; and

WHEREAS, on January 10, 2019, K & M Casinos, Inc. , changed the name of the Clovis 500 Club to 500 Club Casino with the approval of the California Gambling Control Commission (“Commission”); and

WHEREAS, on April 26, 2022, Michael LeBlanc, Kevin Barclay, and Mark English entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) whereby Michael LeBlanc agreed to sell all of his 50 percent interest in K & M Casinos, Inc., to Kevin Barclay and Mark English, with each receiving a 25 percent interest, resulting in Kevin Barclay owning 75 percent, and Mark English owning 25 percent, of K & M Casinos, Inc.; and

WHEREAS, as a condition of the sale of interest in K & M Casinos, Inc., to Mark English, Michael LeBlanc and Mark English entered into a Secured Promissory Note and Stock Pledge Agreement whereby Mark English’s shares in K & M Casinos, Inc. , were pledged to Michael LeBlanc as collateral for his full payment of his interest in K & M Casinos, Inc., and under which, in the event of default by Mark English, Michael LeBlanc shall be entitled to any profits from K & M Casinos, Inc. , received by Mark English, and/or exercise shareholder rights associate d with the liened shares of K & M Casinos, Inc., until full payment under the Secured Promissory Note and Purchase Agreement is received; and

WHEREAS, on October 20, 2022, the Commission approved the Purchase Agreement; and

WHEREAS, Section 5.6.25 of the Clovis Municipal Code permits the sale and/or transfer of an interest in a licensed gaming club with prior approval of the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the Clovis Police Department has performed background checks on Kevin Barclay and Mark English, and performed other due diligence in evaluating whether the City Council should approve the sale and transfer of interest in K & M Casinos, Inc., in accordance with the Purchase Agreement; and
396
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.

WHEREAS, the Police Chief and City Administration recommend the Ci ty Council waive any procedural irregularities in the order by which K & M Casinos, Inc. , obtained approval of the Purchase Agreement and associated sale and transfer of interest in K & M Casinos, Inc., and approve such sale and transfer, subject to the conditions set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Clovis as follows:

1. The sale and transfer of interest in K & M Casinos, Inc,. and any corresponding sale, transfer, or assignment in the January 8, 2018, Card Room License from Michael LeBlanc to Kevin Barclay and Mark English in accordance with the Purchase Agreement, is hereby approved, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein.

2. Kevin Barclay and Mark English shall comply with all terms and conditions of the January 8, 2018, Card Room License issued to K & M Casinos, Inc., the terms of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and any future amendments thereto.

3. The City Council finds that pursuant to Section 5.6.15 of the Clovis Municipal Code, a licensed gaming club is prohibited from having any pointholders, defined under Clovis Municipal Code Section 5.6.04(x) as “any person or entity, other than a licensee named in a license, having a financial interest or beneficial interests in the license.” Accordingly, in the event of default under the Secured Promissory Note and Stock Pledge Agreement, in relation to which Michael LeBlanc may, and does, initiate a ny type of action to foreclose upon, or otherwise enforce the security interest held against any shares in K & M Casinos, Inc. , held by Mark English pursuant to the Secured Promissory Note and Stock Pledge Agreement, Michael LeBlanc and Mark English shall notify the City of such action, and shall submit an application to the City for approval of the proposed transfer from Mark English to Michael LeBlanc, or any other party, of any proceeds from the operation of K & M Casinos, Inc., or of shares of K & M Casinos, Inc., pursuant to the Secured Promissory Note and/or Stock Pledge Agreement, and such transfer shall be contingent upon the City Council’s prior approval of the same in accordance with Section 5.6.25 of the Clovis Municipal Code. In the event any underlying default giving rise to Michael LeBlanc’s right to foreclose upon or otherwise enforce the security interest set forth in the Secured Promissory Note and Stock Pledge Agreement is resolved such that no transfer of any proceeds of the operation of K & M Casinos, Inc., or of the pledged shares of K & M Casinos, Inc., will occur, Michael LeBlanc and Mark English shall promptly notify the City. Pursuant to Sections 5.6.15 and 5.6.25 of the Clovis Municipal Code, any unauthorized transfer to Michael LeBlanc of the proceeds of the operation of K & M Casinos, Inc., or of the pledged shares of K & M Casinos, Inc., may result in termination of the January 8, 2018, Card Room License.

397
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.
* * * * *

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a r egular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on April 15, 2024, by the following vote, to wit.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED: April 15, 2024

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

398
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.

500 Club 4/8/2024 4:53:44 PM Page 1 of 4

TO: Mayor and City Council

FROM: Administration

DATE: January 8, 2018

SUBJECT: Consider Various Actions associated with the Clovis 500 Club card room located at 771 W. Shaw Avenue:

a. Consider Approval – Res. 18 -__, A Request to approve the transfer of the 500 Club Card Room License from Louis Sarantos to K & M Casinos, Inc.

b. Consider Approval – Res. 18-__, Setting License Fees for Gaming Clubs and Card Rooms in the City.

ATTACHMENTS: A. Res. 18-___- To approve the transfer of the 500 Club Card Room License from Louis Sarantos to K & M Casinos, Inc.

B. Res. 18___ - Setting License Fees from Gaming Clubs and Card Rooms in the City.

C. September 13, 2010 Council Report (less Attachments).

D. September 6, 2011 Council Report (less Attachments).

E. May 21, 2012 Council Report (less Attachments).

F. Letter from Seller dated December 22, 2017.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None

RECOMMENDATION

For the City Council to approve:

a. The transfer of the 500 Club Card Room License from Louis Sarantos to K & M Casinos, Inc. and;

ATTACHMENT 2

AGENDA ITEM NO:

City Manager:

399
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.

City Council Report
500 Club
January 8, 2018

500 Club 4/8/2024 4:53:44 PM Page 2 of 4
b. Approve a resolution setting License Fees from Gaming Clubs and Card Rooms in the City.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Staff is in receipt of a request from letter from James Betts, representing Louis Sarantos, owner of the 500 Club at 771 W. Shaw Avenue requesting “….the City of Clovis take all necessary action to approve the sale of the 500 Club Casino, 771 W. Shaw Avenue, Clovis, California, to buyers Michael LeBlanc and Kevin Barclay.”

The Sarantos family began renting the 500 Club building, at 500 Clovis Ave., in 1953. In 1974, Louis and George Sarantos bought the club f rom their paren ts and formed a partnership. In May 2009 , Louis Sarantos approached the City about the possibility of expanding and relocating to the current location of 771 W. Shaw Avenue. 500 Clovis Avenue remains open as a bar and grill but there is no gaming at that location. In mid-2012, the 500 Club opened up on Shaw Avenue expanding from six tables at the old location to 18 tables at the new location. The 500 Club pays the City a license fee based upon a percentage of the gross gaming revenue. At the old locati on the City received approximately $20,000 per year in license fees. At the new location, the City has averaged approximately $420,000 per fiscal year in license fees paid to the City over the past five years. In November 2017, Louis Sarantos approached the City requesting the C ity approve the sale of the Clovis 500 Club License to K & M Casinos, Inc. Staff is also recommending an update to the license fees.

BACKGROUND

In May 2009, Louis Sarantos (“Sarantos”) made two requests of the City: (1) to purchase the entire 50% general partnership interest of George Sarantos in the Clovis 500 Club partnership; and (2) to relocate, expand, incorporate, and allow for the sale of the card room business to qualified third parties with prior State and City approval.

The proposal was before City Council in various capacities on five separate occasions between 2010 and 2012. On September 6, 2011, the Council approved necessary ordinance amendments and land use approvals for the expansion, including: Ordinance Amendment OA2011-03, which amended the City’s Card Room Ordinance to authorize 18 tables, as permitted by the California Gambling Control Act, and made other technical changes; OA2011-02, which amended Section 9.3.215.1 of the Clovis Municipal Code to add card rooms as a permitted use in the C -2 (Community Commercial) Zone District; and Site Plan Review SPR2011-06, which allowed for modifications to the structure and property site to accommodate the card room operation.

The City of Clovis currently has a single card room governed by Chapter 5.6 of the Clovis Municipal Code regarding Gaming Club and Card Room Regulations in the City of Clovis (“Card Room Ordinance”). Local licensing and regulation of gaming is in addition to, and in compliance with, regulations set forth by the California Gambling Control Act. Sarantos submitted an application to the California Gambling Control Commission (CGCC) for 400
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.

City Council Report
500 Club
January 8, 2018

500 Club 4/8/2024 4:53:44 PM Page 3 of 4
purposes of obtaining a license to operate 18 tables that was approved by the CGCC in May 2012, and the new location became operational in June 2012.

In order for Sarantos to transfer the License, the application must be approved by the CGCC and a License must be issued by the City of Clovis. Approval of this action will pr ovide Sarantos the ability to transfer the license in accordance with Chapter 5.6 of the Clovis Municipal Code. Approval of the transfer of the License is contingent on approval from the CGCC, and subject to the conditions set forth in the Exhibit A of At tachment “A” (“K & M Casinos License”).

Between 2009 and 2011, staff developed the current ordinance to ensure that it had measures in place that could be implemented should the operation of the gaming establishment cause an increase in calls for service. The Police Department reports that the calls for service over the past five years have been minimal and that the business has been managed in a professional manner. The Clovis Police Department has performed background checks on the principals of buyers , and performed other due diligence in evaluating whether the Council should approve transfer of the License; and the Police Chief and City Administration recommend approval of the proposed transfer.

FISCAL IMPACT

When setting license fees in 2010, the o verall goal was to ensure that a sufficient revenue stream was generated for the City to more than cover the cost of additional services being required to support the operation of the expanded card room at the new location.

The current fee schedule charges the card room both a fixed amount of $2,000 per table per year and a graduated scale of the percentage of gross revenue beginning with 3% and climbing to 9% in year 7 for gross revenues over $2M. This fee schedule allowed the business to become established in the early years and when established allowed the City to benefit in a commensurate fashion. The analysis completed in 2010 showed three scenarios to give the Council an idea of what could happen. Scenario 3 was quite aggressive and began sales in year 1 at $5.0M with license fees estimated at $460K per year. Year 1 (2012/13) actual performance paid the City of Clovis over $500K and has averaged approximately $415K over the last five years.

Staff is recommending changing the License fee to a strai ght 10% of Gross Revenue as defined in Exhibit “A” of Attachment “B”. The effective average rate was 6.25%. Staff estimates that the difference between the effective average rate of 6.25% and the recommended straight 10% of Gross Revenue will generate an additional $250K per year for the City. It was always the intent to revisit the license fee in the future and when and if the 500 Club were sold.

The table below is from the City of Fresno Master Fee Schedule dated November 2016.

Fresno City Staff indicate that the Club One Casino is the only card room in the City of Fresno and paid the City approximately $1.0M. The $1.0M annual License fee equates to 401
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.

City Council Report
500 Club
January 8, 2018

500 Club 4/8/2024 4:53:44 PM Page 4 of 4
approximately $835K per month in Monthly Gross Revenue which equates to an average rate of 10% Club One Casino paying the City of Fresno.

Card Room Gross Revenue Permit Fee (FMC 9-2132)
Monthly Gross Revenue Monthly
$0 - 800,000 9%
$800,001 - 1,000,000 10%
$1,000,001 - 1,200,000 11%
$1,200,001 - 1,400,000 12%
$1,400,001+ 13%

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION

Staff is recommending approval of the request to transfer the License to K & M Casinos, Inc. based on the background results of the buyers and is conditioned upon approval by the CGCC. Staff spent three years (2009 – 2011) developing an or dinance to ensure that the sole card room in the City of Clovis will be managed in a fashion beneficial to both the operator and the City of Clovis. A well-crafted Ordinance is in effect, the seller has run a successful operation at the current location, and the gaming industry is heavily regulated by the CGCC.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL

If approved, staff will issue the License, monitor operations, and report back to Council on an as needed basis.

Submitted by: John Holt, Assistant City Manager_____

402
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Administration
DATE: April 15, 2024
SUBJECT: Consider Approval – Various Actions Associated with the Personnel Commission and Planning Commission.

Staff: John Holt, City Manager
Recommendation: Approve

ATTACHMENTS: None.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Mayor, subject to approval by the City Council:

1. Reappoint Jose “JoJo” Reyes and Diane Staebler to the Personnel Commission for a four-year term of office to expire in May 2028;

2. Approve the correction of the term for Personnel Commissioner Jerry Brady, currently showing an expiration of May 2027, corrected term will end in May 2028;

3. Appoint Charlotte Gallock to the Personnel Commission for a two-year term to expire in May 2026, completing the term vacated by Eric Zetz.

4. Reappoint Paul Hinkle to the Planning Commission for a four-year term to expire in May 2028.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Personnel Commissioners Jose “JoJo” Reyes and Diane Staebler, whose terms of office expire in May of 202 4, have requested to be reappointed. Mayor Ashbeck is recommending that the Personnel Commissioners be reappointed.
403
AGENDA ITEM NO. 18.

A correction of the term for Jerry Brady is also necessary, which is currently showing an expiration of May 2027. The term end for Jerry Brady is being recommended to be corrected to May 2028.

There is an opening on the Personnel Commission due to Commissioner Eric Zetz resigning as he no longer resides in the City of Clovis. Interviews were conducted with interested applicants, and Mayor Ashbeck is recommending the appointment of Charlotte Gallock. If appointed, their term of office will expire in May of 2026, completing the term vacated by Eric Zetz.

Planning Commissioner Paul Hinkle, whose term of office expires in May of 2024, has requested to be reappointed. Mayor Ashbeck is recommending that the Planning Commissioner be reappointed.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to Clovis Municipal Code Chapter 9.1, the Mayor, with approval of the City Council, shall make appointments to the Personnel and Planning Commissions.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will inform the appointed Personnel and Planning Commissioners of the action taken by the City Council.

Prepared by: Rebecca Simonian, Executive Assistant

Reviewed by: City Manager JH
404
AGENDA ITEM NO. 18.

Clovis City CouncilApril 15, 2024

Clovis City Council
April 15, 2024