Agenda packet — Clovis City Council, January 21, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

January 21, 2025 - 1 - 3:28 PM A G E N D A • C I T Y C O U N C I L M E E T I N G

January 21, 2025 6:00 PM Council Chamber

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to access the City Council Chamber to participate at this meeting, please contact the City Clerk or General Services Director at (559) 324 -2060 (TTY – 711). Notificatio n 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the Council Chamber.

The Clovis City Council meetings are open to the public at the physical address listed above. There are numerous ways to participate in the City Council meetings: you are able to attend in person; you may submit written comments as described below; and you may view the meeting which is webcast and accessed at www.cityofclovis.com/agendas.

Written Comments

 Members of the public are encouraged to submit written comments at:
www.cityofclovis.com/agendas at least two (2) hours before the meeting (4:00 p.m.). You will be prompted to provide:

 Council Meeting Date
 Item Number
 Name
 Email
 Comment

 Please submit a separate form for each item you are commenting on.

 A copy of your written comment will be provided to the City Council noting the item number.

If you wish to make a verbal comment, please see instructions below.

 Please be aware that any written comments received that do not specify a particular agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the agenda.

 If a written comment is received after 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting, efforts will be made to provide the comment to the City Council during the meeting. However, staff cannot guarantee that written comments received after 4:00 p.m. will be provided to City Council during the meeting. All written comments received prior to the end of the meeting will be made part of the record of proceedings.

Council Chamber, 1033 Fifth Street, Clovis, CA 93612 (559) 324-2060 www.cityofclovis.com
1 January 21, 2025 - 2 - 3:28 PM CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION PROHIBITIONS AND MANDATORY DISCLOSURE – Pursuant to Government Code section 84308, a Councilmember shall not accept, solicit, or direct a campaign contribution of more than $500 from any party or their agent, or from any participant or their agent, while a proceeding involving a license, permit, contract, or other entitlement for use is pending before the City or for 12 months after a final decision is rendered in that proceeding. Any Councilmember who has received a campaign contribution of more than $500 within the preceding 12 months from a pa rty or their agent, or from a participant or their agent, must disclose that fact on the record of the proceeding and shall not make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence the decision.

Pursuant to Government Code section 84308, subdivision (e), any party to a covered proceeding before the City Council is required to disclose on the record of the proceeding any campaign contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $500 made within the pre ceding 12 months by the party or their agent to any Councilmember. The disclosure shall be made as required by Government Code Section 84308, subdivision (e)(1) and California Code of Regulations, Title 2, section 18438.8. No party or their agent, and no p articipant or their agent, shall make a campaign contribution of more than $500 to any Councilmember during the covered proceeding or for 12 months after a final decision is made in that proceeding. The foregoing statements do not constitute legal advice, and parties and participants are urged to consult with their own legal counsel regarding the applicable requirements of the law.

CALL TO ORDER

FLAG SALUTE - Councilmember Bessinger

ROLL CALL

PUBLIC HEARING – Item to be heard at 6:05 p.m.

1. Receive and File - Information from Third Public Hearing in City’s Transition to District- Based Elections.

Staff: Briana Parra, City Clerk
Recommendation: Receive and File

PUBLIC COMMENTS - This is an opportunity for the members of the public to address the City Council on any matter within the City Council’s jurisdiction that is not listed on the Agenda. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to 3 minutes or less, or 10 minutes per topic. Anyone wishing to be placed on the Agenda for a specific topic should contact the City Manager’s office and submit correspondence at least 10 days before the desired date of appearance.

CONSENT CALENDAR - Items considered routine in nature are to be placed upon the Consent Calendar. They will all be considered and voted upon in one vote as one item unless a Councilmember requests individual consideration. A Councilmember’s vote in favor of the Consent Calendar is considered and rec orded as a separate affirmative vote in favor of each action listed. Motions in favor of adoption of the Consent Calendar are deemed to include a motion to waive the reading of any ordinance or resolution on the Consent Calendar. For adoption of ordinances, only those that have received a unanimous vote upon introduction are considered Consent items.

2 January 21, 2025 - 3 - 3:28 PM

2. Administration - Approval - Minutes from the January 13, 2025, Council Meeting.

3. General Services - Approval – Res. 25-___, Authorizing Amendments to the City’s Classification and Compensation Plans to Adopt the Police Records Specialist I Classification with a Salary Range of $4 ,790 to $5,823 per month, Police Records Specialist II Classification with a Salary Range of $5,292 to $6,433 per month and the Senior Police Records Specialist Classification with a Salary Range of $5,878 to $7,145 per month and Approval – Res. 25-___, Amending the City’s FY 24-25 Position Allocation Plan to Delete Seven (7) Principal Office Assistant Positions and Two (2) Administrative Assistant Positions, and adding Seven (7) Police Records Specialist I Positions and Two (2) Senior Police Records Speci alist Positions within the Police Department.

PUBLIC HEARINGS - A public hearing is an open consideration within a regular or special meeting of the City Council, for which special notice has been given and may be required. When a public hearing is continued, noticing of the adjourned item is required as per Government Code 54955.1.

4. Consider various items associated with approximately 201 acres on the east side of North Minnewawa Avenue, between East Behymer and Shepherd Avenues. Multiple, owners; Lennar Homes, applicant; Yamabe & Horn Engineering Inc., representative.

a. Consider Approval - Res. 25-__, TM6375, A resolution of the City Council approving a vesting tentative tract map for a 385 -lot s ingle-family planned residential development on approximately 58.9 acres of land.

b. Consider Approval - Res. 25 -__, PDP2024 -001, A resolution of the City Council approving a planned development permit for a 385 -lot single -family residential development.

c. Consider Approval - Res. 25-___, RO310, A resolution of the City Council approving an application for the annexation of the territory known as the Shepherd -Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization area (approximately 201 acres).

Staff: Liz Salazar, Associate Planner
Recommendation: Approve

5. Consider Introduction – Ord. 25 -__, an Ordinance Repealing Ordinance 24 -16 Amending Section 2.1.01 of Chapter 2 of Title 2 of the Clovis Municipal Code Relating to City Council Meeting Day and Time Adopted on November 12, 2024. (Continued from the meeting of January 6, 2025).

Staff: Andrew Haussler, City Manager
Recommendation: Approve

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS - Administrative Items are matters o n the regular City Council Agenda other than Public Hearings.

6. Update council on the plan to improve the area on the south side of Ashlan Avenue just west of Leonard Avenue with missing sidewalk.

Staff: Thad Avery, City Engineer
Recommendation: Update
3 January 21, 2025 - 4 - 3:28 PM

7. Consider and Provide Direction on future 2024-2025 Budget Amendments to reach the Goals of Measure Y and the 2025-2026 Budget Process.

Staff: Andy Haussler, City Manager
Recommendation: Provide Direction

CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

COUNCIL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

FUTURE MEETINGS

Regular City Council Meetings are held at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber. The following are future meeting dates:

February 4, 2025 (Tue.)

4 TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Administration
DATE: January 21, 2025
SUBJECT: Receive and File - Information from Third Public Hearing in City’s Transition to District-Based Elections.

Staff: Briana Parra, City Clerk
Recommendation: Receive and File

ATTACHMENTS: 1. NDC PowerPoint Presentation

2. Election Sequencing

3. Draft Maps

4. Public Hearing Notice

RECOMMENDATION
For the City Council to receive and file information , and provide input related to draft district maps created by the City’s demographer and members of the public , as part of the City’s transition from at -large to district -based elections. For Council to provide direction on whether the City should continue to consider the alternative option of transitioning to a four -member Council with an at-large-elected Mayor.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On August 26, 2024, the City of Clovis received a demand letter claiming racially polarized voting exists in the City’s elections in violation of the California Voting Rights Act (“CVRA”). Despite the lack of evidence of polarized voting in the City’s elections, to avoid lengthy and costly litigation, on October 7, 2024, the Council adopted Resolution 2 4-110, to initiate the transition to district - based elections beginning with the November 2026 City Council Election. As part of the process of transitioning to district-based elections, the City is required to hold at least five public hearings to allow t he public and Council the opportunity to provide input on the transition process and possible district maps.

The first public hearing was held on November 16, 2024, and the second was held on December 16, 2024. Tonight is third of the five hearings and is the first hearing in which Council will review and consider draft district maps, some of which were prepared by the City’s demographer and others by members of the public. Although Council will be considering maps for possible adoption at a future date, this hearing is strictly informational for the public and Council. However, Staff is asking for Council to give direction on whether the City should continue to consider the 5 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
option of transitioning to a four -member Council with four election districts and an at -large- elected Mayor instead of retaining a five-member Council and adopting five election districts.

BACKGROUND
On August 26, 2024, the City of Clovis received a demand letter from the Southwest Voter Registration Education Project (“SVREP”) claiming that racially polarized voting exists in the City’s elections in violation of the California Voting Rights Act (“CVRA ”). This letter further advised that the City had the choice to voluntarily convert from its current at -large election system to district -based elections - where Councilmembers are elected by only the voters residing within the election district in which the candidate resides or face a legal challenge to its current at-large election system. Despite the lack of evidence of racially polarized voting or vote dilution in the City’s elections, on October 7, 2024, the Council passed Resolution 24 -110, declaring its intent to transition from an at -large election system to a district -based election system. This decision was primarily made to avoid what would likely be a prohibitively costly and unfavorable legal challenge to the City’s at-large elections by SVREP.

Since the adoption of Resolution 24 -110, the City has engaged an expert demographic firm, National Demographics Corporation (“NDC”), to assist the City with the process of converting to district-based elections. The City has also started public outreach related to the election transition process by creating a dedicated webpage, which will serve as a public resource for related information and communications. Additionally, on January 9, 2025, the City also hosted a community map drawing workshop, during w hich the consultant provided explanations and demonstrations on how to create maps that meet the required criteria.

The City’s transition to election districts is mostly governed by Elections Code section 10010, pursuant to which, the City Council is requ ired to hold at least five public hearings prior to approving a final election district map and adopting an ordinance to implement district -based elections. The first two hearings, known as “pre -map” hearings, occur prior to the City’s development of any draft maps and are for the purpose of gathering public and Council input on the process and potential election districts. Thereafter, the next two hearings are for the public and Council to consider and provide input on any draft district maps. The last hearing is for the Council to adopt a final map setting forth the boundaries of the City’s election districts and to establish the election sequencing for those districts. The City’s demographer is assisting the City with this process.

The City has completed the first two public hearings in the transition process. Tonight’s hearing is the third, during which Council will for the first time consider draft maps prepared by the City’s demographer. Members of the public were also invited to submit draft maps, which are included in those being presented to Council for consideration this evening. The City’s demographer will present to Council information on each draft map, including individual district boundaries and overall compliance of the map with federal and state law.

Although Council is not being asked to take action tonight, Staff is requesting direction from Council on whether the City should continue to consider the option of transitioning to a four - member Council with four election districts and a n at-large-elected Mayor, or if the City should retain a five-member Council and adopt five election districts.

6 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
Tonight’s hearing is a continuation of the City’s process of converting to district-based elections in accordance with Resolution 24-110.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Receive and file information provided in tonight’s public hearing.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

Prepared by: Briana Parra, City Clerk

Reviewed by: City Manager AH
7 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

CITY OF CLOVIS
Draft Maps Discussion
January 21, 2025 Dr. Jeff Tilton, Senior Consultant
National Demographics Corporation
ATTACHMENT 1
8 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
2 Districting Process
2 Step Description
Pre-draft map hearing
November 18
• Held prior to release of draft maps
• Education and to solicit input on the composition of districts Pre-draft map hearing
December 16
• Held prior to release of draft maps
• Education and to solicit input on the composition of districts Community Workshop
January 9
• Clovis Transit Center, 6 p.m.
• Learn about the process and mapping tools
Release draft maps • Maps must be posted at least 7 days prior to hearing • Public maps must be submitted by 10 days prior to hearing Hearing on draft maps
January 21
• Discuss and revise the draft maps
• Deadline to submissions: January 9, 5 p.m.

Hearing on draft maps
February 10
• Discuss and revise the draft maps
• Deadline to submissions: January 30, 5 p.m.

Selection of final map
March 3
• Select final map and the election sequence; Ordinance first reading • Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption • Deadline to submissions: February 21, 5 p.m.

Ordinance adoption
March 10
• Map adopted via Ordinance
Within 21 days of
map adoption
• Issue compliance report
9 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
3 Equal Population
Federal Voting Rights Act
No Racial Gerrymandering
“Shall not adopt election district
boundaries for the purpose of favoring
or discriminating against an incumbent,
political candidate, or political party.”
No other criterion may be prioritized
over statutory criteria.

1. Federal Laws 2. California Criteria
Mandatory in prioritized order:

1. Geographically contiguous

2. Avoid division of
neighborhoods and
“communities of interest”
(Socio-economic geographic areas
that should be kept together)

3. Easily identifiable
boundaries

4. Compact
(Do not bypass one group of
people to get to a more distant
group of people)

2. California Prohibition
3 Districting Rules and Goals
Future population growth

3. Other Traditional
Redistricting Principles
January 21, 2025
10 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
44 The Maps
January 21, 2025
11 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
55 The Maps: 4 Districts, At Large Mayor
January 21, 2025
12 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
66 The Maps: 4 Districts, At Large Mayor
January 21, 2025
13 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
77 The Maps: 4 Districts, At Large Mayor
January 21, 2025
14 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
88 The Maps: 4 Districts, At Large Mayor
January 21, 2025
15 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
99 The Maps: 4 Districts, At Large Mayor
January 21, 2025
16 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
1010
The Maps: 5 Districts
January 21, 2025
17 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
1111
The Maps: 5 Districts
January 21, 2025
18 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
1212
The Maps: 5 Districts
January 21, 2025
19 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
1313
The Maps: 5 Districts
January 21, 2025
20 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
1414
Proposed Election Sequencing
January 21, 2025
21 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
1515
Discussion / Feedback
January 21, 2025
 What do you like or dislike about the various maps?
 What possible changes would improve the maps?
22 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
16 Share Your Thoughts
Website
cityofclovis.com
Phone
559.324.2060
Email
[email protected]
16January 21, 2025
23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

City of Clovis
Potential Election Sequencing Schedule
This document provides a proposed election sequencing schedule for the draft maps titled “400” Districts and “500” Districts
400 Districting, At Large Mayor (First Elected in 2026) 401:
2026 Election: Districts 1 and 2
2028 Election: Districts 3 and 4
402:
2026 Election: Districts 1 and 2
2028 Election: Districts 3 and 4
403:
2026 Election: Districts 1 and 3
2028 Election: Districts 2 and 4
405:
2026 Election: Districts 1 and 2
2028 Election: Districts 3 and 4
500 Districting
501:
2026 Election: Districts 1, 2 and 3
2028 Election: Districts 4 and 5
502:
2026 Election: Districts 1, 2 and 3
2028 Election: Districts 4 and 5
503:
2026 Election: Districts 1, 2 and 5
2028 Election: Districts 3 and 4
4924-9824-8463 v.1.docx
ATTACHMENT 2
24 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
2 3
4 1
Gettysburg
ES
Red Bank ES
Cox ES
Dry Creek
ES
Clovis High
Jefferson
ES
Gateway ES
Oraze ES
Weldon ES
Tarpey ES
Buchanan
High
Garfield ES
Alta Sierra
MS
Heliport
FS
FS
FS
FS
Tollhouse
Rd
W
Shaw
Av
e
Temperance Ave
E Bullard Ave
W Sierra Ave
N Villa Ave
N Locan Ave
Sunnyside Ave
W Herndon Ave
E Alluvial Ave
Armstrong Ave
E Ashlan Ave
N Peach Ave
W
Barstow
Ave
W
G
ettysburg Ave
Clovis Ave
N Fowler Ave
Bernad
ine D
r
Willow Ave
E Shepherd Ave
N
ees
Ave
E Teague Ave
N Marion Ave
N Locan Ave
N Leonard Ave
N De Wolf Ave
N Highland Ave
Clovis 2025
Districting
National Demographics Corporation, January 12, 2025
Unpopulated, non-contiguous
area to the north is in District 1.
©2021 CALIPERATTACHMENT 3
25 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
401
District 1
Total Pop 31,248
Deviation from ideal 1,133
% Deviation 3.76%
% Hisp 21.0%
% NH White 57%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 16%
Total 20,515
% Hisp 19%
% NH White 63%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 14%
Total 20,421
% Latino est. 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 16%
% Asian-Surnamed 7%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 69%
% NH Black 4%
Total 12,112
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 74%
% NH Black 5%
Total 17,588
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 75%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 31,570
age0-19 33%
age20-60 49%
age60plus 19%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 69%
english 76%
spanish 10%
asian-lang 8%
other lang 6%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 7%
hs-grad 46%
bachelor 29%
graduatedegree 19%
Child in Household child-under18 44%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 5%
income 25-50k 7%
income 50-75k 9%
income 75-200k 52%
income 200k-plus 26%
single family 91%
multi-family 9%
rented 23%
owned 77%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

3.42%
41%
40%
4%
10%
20,043
38%
48%
5%
8%
15,470
34%
30%
3%
1%
57%
5%
6,843
26%
23%
3%
1%
65%
5%
12,156
31%
28%
3%
1%
62%
5%
30,508
30%
53%
17%
11%
50%
73%
20%
5%
2%
8%
66%
14%
7%
35%
60%
18%
23%
21%
31%
5%
53%
47%
62%
38%
3 28,779
-1,336
-4.44%
32%
52%
2%
10%
20,277
28%
60%
3%
9%
18,555
27%
24%
4%
1%
65%
3%
9,980
21%
19%
3%
1%
72%
3%
15,477
22%
21%
3%
1%
72%
3%
28,288
27%
51%
22%
10%
67%
79%
13%
5%
3%
7%
58%
21%
12%
34%
62%
7%
17%
15%
49%
12%
84%
16%
30%
70%
4 29,288
-827
-2.75%
28%
44%
3%
20%
18,756
28%
50%
4%
16%
18,209
27%
25%
8%
2%
59%
4%
9,533
24%
21%
5%
2%
65%
4%
14,497
24%
22%
6%
2%
67%
2%
30,147
33%
50%
17%
15%
61%
77%
10%
8%
5%
6%
55%
24%
14%
48%
64%
5%
8%
11%
57%
19%
98%
2%
13%
87%
Total
120,461
2,469

8.20%
31%
48%
3%
14%
79,591
28%
56%
4%
12%
72,655
26%
23%
6%
1%
63%
4%
38,468
20%
18%
4%
1%
70%
4%
59,718
22%
21%
5%
1%
70%
3%
120,514
31%
51%
18%
12%
62%
76%
13%
7%
4%
7%
56%
22%
13%
40%
62%
9%
15%
14%
46%
15%
80%
20%
34%
66%
01/12/2025 11:51 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
26 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
3 4
2 1
Gettysburg
ES
Red Bank ES
Cox ES
Dry Creek
ES
Clovis High
Jefferson
ES
Gateway ES
Oraze ES
Weldon ES
Tarpey ES
Buchanan
High
Garfield ES
Alta Sierra
MS
Heliport
FS
FS
FS
FS
Tollhouse
Rd
W
Shaw
Av
e
Temperance Ave
E Bullard Ave
W Sierra Ave
N Villa Ave
N Locan Ave
Sunnyside Ave
W Herndon Ave
E Alluvial Ave
Armstrong Ave
E Ashlan Ave
N Peach Ave
W
Barstow
Ave
W
G
ettysburg Ave
Clovis Ave
N Fowler Ave
Bernad
ine D
r
Willow Ave
E Shepherd Ave
N
ees
Ave
E Teague Ave
N Marion Ave
N Locan Ave
N Leonard Ave
N Highland Ave
Clovis 2025
Districting
National Demographics Corporation, January 12, 2025
Unpopulated, non-contiguous
area to the north is in District 1.
©2021 CALIPER
27 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
402
District 1
Total Pop 31,217
Deviation from ideal 1,102
% Deviation 3.66%
% Hisp 28.2%
% NH White 53%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 12%
Total 19,983
% Hisp 27%
% NH White 60%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 8%
Total 18,699
% Latino est. 24%
% Spanish-Surnamed 21%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 66%
% NH Black 4%
Total 10,204
% Latino est. 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 16%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 72%
% NH Black 5%
Total 15,924
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 72%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 30,532
age0-19 30%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 58%
english 74%
spanish 16%
asian-lang 5%
other lang 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 9%
hs-grad 55%
bachelor 22%
graduatedegree 14%
Child in Household child-under18 35%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 10%
income 25-50k 22%
income 50-75k 15%
income 75-200k 39%
income 200k-plus 15%
single family 68%
multi-family 32%
rented 46%
owned 54%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.
2 29,903
-212
-0.70%
26%
54%
3%
13%
20,268
22%
64%
2%
11%
19,311
21%
19%
6%
1%
69%
3%
11,194
17%
15%
4%
1%
74%
4%
16,115
19%
17%
5%
1%
74%
2%
30,402
32%
50%
17%
11%
70%
79%
10%
7%
3%
6%
50%
27%
18%
44%
62%
5%
9%
11%
54%
21%
91%
9%
22%
78%
3 30,784
669

2.22%
41%
40%
4%
11%
20,347
37%
48%
4%
11%
16,168
34%
31%
3%
1%
58%
4%
7,116
27%
24%
3%
1%
65%
4%
12,817
30%
28%
3%
1%
64%
3%
29,568
28%
54%
18%
11%
56%
74%
18%
6%
2%
8%
66%
15%
6%
35%
60%
17%
16%
21%
40%
6%
67%
33%
50%
50%
4 28,557
-1,558
-5.17%
27%
45%
3%
21%
18,993
27%
50%
5%
17%
18,477
26%
23%
8%
2%
59%
4%
9,955
22%
20%
5%
2%
65%
5%
14,862
22%
21%
7%
2%
67%
2%
30,012
33%
49%
18%
15%
65%
77%
9%
8%
5%
6%
54%
25%
14%
48%
63%
4%
10%
11%
55%
20%
99%
1%
11%
89%
Total
120,461
2,660

8.83%
31%
48%
3%
14%
79,591
28%
56%
4%
12%
72,655
26%
23%
6%
1%
63%
4%
38,468
20%
18%
4%
1%
70%
4%
59,718
22%
21%
5%
1%
70%
3%
120,514
31%
51%
18%
12%
62%
76%
13%
7%
4%
7%
56%
22%
13%
40%
62%
9%
15%
14%
46%
15%
80%
20%
34%
66%
01/12/2025 11:52 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
28 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
2 4
3 1
Gettysburg
ES
Red Bank ES
Cox ES
Dry Creek
ES
Clovis High
Jefferson
ES
Gateway ES
Oraze ES
Weldon ES
Tarpey ES
Buchanan
High
Garfield ES
Alta Sierra
MS
Heliport
FS
FS
FS
FS
Tollhouse
Rd
W
Shaw
Av
e
Temperance Ave
E Bullard Ave
W Sierra Ave
N Villa Ave
N Locan Ave
Sunnyside Ave
W Herndon Ave
E Alluvial Ave
Armstrong Ave
E Ashlan Ave
N Peach Ave
W
Barstow
Ave
W
G
ettysburg Ave
Clovis Ave
N Fowler Ave
Bernad
ine D
r
Willow Ave
E Shepherd Ave
N
ees
Ave
E Teague Ave
N Marion Ave
N Locan Ave
N Leonard Ave
N De Wolf Ave
N Highland Ave
Clovis 2025
Districting
National Demographics Corporation, January 12, 2025
Unpopulated, non-contiguous
area to the north is in District 1.
©2021 CALIPER
29 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
403
District 1
Total Pop 30,342
Deviation from ideal 227
% Deviation 0.75%
% Hisp 26.3%
% NH White 54%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 12%
Total 19,793
% Hisp 25%
% NH White 62%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 8%
Total 18,529
% Latino est. 22%
% Spanish-Surnamed 20%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 67%
% NH Black 4%
Total 10,324
% Latino est. 17%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 73%
% NH Black 5%
Total 15,970
% Latino est. 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 73%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 29,429
age0-19 29%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 62%
english 77%
spanish 12%
asian-lang 6%
other lang 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 7%
hs-grad 54%
bachelor 23%
graduatedegree 14%
Child in Household child-under18 35%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 10%
income 25-50k 20%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 41%
income 200k-plus 16%
single family 68%
multi-family 32%
rented 45%
owned 55%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

0.42%
44%
38%
4%
10%
19,518
39%
46%
4%
10%
15,230
36%
33%
3%
1%
56%
4%
6,399
29%
26%
3%
1%
63%
4%
11,745
34%
31%
3%
1%
61%
4%
29,925
31%
53%
17%
11%
49%
71%
22%
5%
2%
10%
68%
13%
6%
37%
60%
17%
20%
23%
36%
4%
65%
35%
52%
48%
3 29,378
-737
-2.45%
24%
54%
3%
15%
19,491
21%
64%
3%
13%
18,931
21%
19%
6%
1%
68%
3%
10,989
17%
15%
5%
1%
74%
3%
15,962
18%
17%
5%
1%
74%
2%
29,393
33%
51%
17%
12%
73%
80%
9%
8%
3%
6%
50%
28%
18%
45%
63%
5%
6%
9%
56%
24%
94%
6%
19%
81%
4 30,501
386

1.28%
28%
46%
3%
19%
20,788
27%
51%
4%
16%
19,965
26%
23%
7%
2%
60%
4%
10,755
22%
20%
5%
1%
67%
5%
16,041
22%
21%
6%
2%
68%
2%
31,766
31%
49%
20%
14%
63%
77%
9%
8%
5%
6%
54%
25%
13%
44%
63%
5%
11%
11%
54%
19%
96%
4%
15%
85%
Total
120,461
1,123

3.73%
31%
48%
3%
14%
79,591
28%
56%
4%
12%
72,655
26%
23%
6%
1%
63%
4%
38,468
20%
18%
4%
1%
70%
4%
59,718
22%
21%
5%
1%
70%
3%
120,514
31%
51%
18%
12%
62%
76%
13%
7%
4%
7%
56%
22%
13%
40%
62%
9%
15%
14%
46%
15%
80%
20%
34%
66%
01/12/2025 11:52 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
30 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
4 3
2 1
Gettysburg
ES
Red Bank ES
Cox ES
Dry Creek
ES
Clovis High
Jefferson
ES
Gateway ES
Oraze ES
Weldon ES
Tarpey ES
Buchanan
High
Garfield ES
Alta Sierra
MS
Heliport
FS
FS
FS
FS
W
Shaw
Av
e
Temperance Ave
E Bullard Ave
W Sierra Ave
N Villa Ave
N Locan Ave
Sunnyside Ave
W Herndon Ave
E Alluvial Ave
Armstrong Ave
E Ashlan Ave
N Peach Ave
W
Barstow
Ave
W
G
ettysburg Ave
Clovis Ave
N Fowler Ave
Bernad
ine D
r
Willow Ave
E Shepherd Ave
N
ees
Ave
E Teague Ave
N Marion Ave
N Locan Ave
N Leonard Ave
N De Wolf Ave
N Highland Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 12, 2025
Unpopulated, non-contiguous
area to the north is in District 1.

Clovis 2025
Districting
Not population balanced.

Not compact.
©2021 CALIPER
31 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
404
District 1
Total Pop 30,231
Deviation from ideal 116
% Deviation 0.39%
% Hisp 25.2%
% NH White 55%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 13%
Total 19,932
% Hisp 25%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 9%
Total 18,741
% Latino est. 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 67%
% NH Black 5%
Total 10,565
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 73%
% NH Black 5%
Total 16,075
% Latino est. 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 73%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 29,905
age0-19 30%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 20%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 62%
english 77%
spanish 11%
asian-lang 6%
other lang 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 7%
hs-grad 52%
bachelor 25%
graduatedegree 15%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 9%
income 25-50k 18%
income 50-75k 12%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 17%
single family 72%
multi-family 28%
rented 41%
owned 59%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

5.16%
25%
49%
3%
19%
20,332
23%
57%
3%
16%
19,757
23%
21%
8%
2%
63%
4%
11,000
19%
17%
5%
1%
69%
4%
15,895
19%
18%
7%
2%
71%
2%
32,318
35%
50%
15%
13%
69%
78%
8%
8%
5%
5%
51%
28%
16%
48%
62%
5%
7%
11%
54%
23%
96%
4%
18%
82%
3 28,290
-1,825
-6.06%
29%
51%
2%
14%
20,149
26%
58%
4%
12%
18,924
25%
22%
5%
1%
65%
3%
10,530
20%
18%
4%
1%
71%
4%
15,951
22%
20%
5%
1%
70%
3%
29,421
29%
49%
22%
12%
67%
79%
10%
7%
4%
6%
53%
23%
15%
40%
64%
5%
13%
10%
53%
19%
93%
7%
17%
83%
4 30,272
157

0.52%
43%
38%
4%
10%
19,178
39%
47%
4%
9%
15,233
36%
33%
3%
1%
56%
3%
6,374
29%
26%
3%
1%
63%
4%
11,797
33%
31%
2%
1%
62%
3%
28,869
29%
54%
17%
12%
49%
70%
23%
5%
1%
10%
69%
13%
5%
36%
61%
18%
19%
23%
36%
4%
62%
38%
56%
44%
Total
120,461
3,378

11.22%
31%
48%
3%
14%
79,591
28%
56%
4%
12%
72,655
26%
23%
6%
1%
63%
4%
38,468
20%
18%
4%
1%
70%
4%
59,718
22%
21%
5%
1%
70%
3%
120,514
31%
51%
18%
12%
62%
76%
13%
7%
4%
7%
56%
22%
13%
40%
62%
9%
15%
14%
46%
15%
80%
20%
34%
66%
01/12/2025 11:52 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
32 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
4 3
2 1
Gettysburg
ES
Red Bank ES
Cox ES
Dry Creek
ES
Clovis High
Jefferson
ES
Gateway ES
Oraze ES
Weldon ES
Tarpey ES
Buchanan
High
Garfield ES
Alta Sierra
MS
Heliport
FS
FS
FS
FS
Tollhouse
Rd
W
Shaw
Av
e
Temperance Ave
E Bullard Ave
W Sierra Ave
N Villa Ave
N Locan Ave
Sunnyside Ave
W Herndon Ave
E Alluvial Ave
Armstrong Ave
E Ashlan Ave
N Peach Ave
W
Barstow
Ave
W
G
ettysburg Ave
Clovis Ave
N Fowler Ave
Bernad
ine D
r
Willow Ave
E Shepherd Ave
N
ees
Ave
E Teague Ave
N Marion Ave
N Locan Ave
N Leonard Ave
N De Wolf Ave
N Highland Ave
Clovis 2025
Districting
National Demographics Corporation, January 12, 2025
Unpopulated, non-contiguous
area to the north is in District 1.
©2021 CALIPER
33 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
405
District 1
Total Pop 29,579
Deviation from ideal -536
% Deviation -1.78%
% Hisp 26.6%
% NH White 54%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 12%
Total 19,268
% Hisp 26%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 8%
Total 17,954
% Latino est. 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 21%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 66%
% NH Black 5%
Total 9,899
% Latino est. 17%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 73%
% NH Black 5%
Total 15,417
% Latino est. 19%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 72%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 28,941
age0-19 29%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 59%
english 75%
spanish 14%
asian-lang 6%
other lang 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 7%
hs-grad 54%
bachelor 23%
graduatedegree 14%
Child in Household child-under18 34%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 10%
income 25-50k 21%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 40%
income 200k-plus 15%
single family 68%
multi-family 32%
rented 45%
owned 55%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

0.67%
25%
54%
3%
14%
19,887
21%
65%
3%
12%
19,525
21%
19%
6%
1%
68%
3%
11,306
17%
15%
4%
1%
74%
4%
16,371
18%
17%
5%
1%
73%
2%
29,994
33%
51%
17%
11%
72%
80%
10%
7%
4%
6%
50%
27%
18%
45%
63%
5%
7%
11%
55%
23%
91%
9%
24%
76%
3 30,231
116

0.39%
27%
46%
3%
20%
20,618
27%
50%
4%
17%
19,728
26%
23%
7%
2%
60%
4%
10,669
22%
20%
5%
2%
66%
5%
15,931
22%
21%
6%
2%
68%
2%
32,055
32%
48%
19%
14%
66%
78%
9%
8%
5%
6%
53%
25%
14%
46%
63%
4%
10%
10%
54%
21%
99%
1%
10%
90%
4 30,333
218

0.72%
43%
39%
4%
10%
19,818
38%
48%
3%
10%
15,448
35%
32%
3%
1%
57%
3%
6,593
28%
25%
3%
1%
65%
3%
11,999
32%
30%
3%
1%
63%
3%
29,524
29%
54%
17%
11%
50%
73%
21%
5%
1%
9%
68%
14%
6%
37%
60%
17%
18%
23%
38%
4%
65%
35%
52%
48%
Total
120,461
754

2.50%
31%
48%
3%
14%
79,591
28%
56%
4%
12%
72,655
26%
23%
6%
1%
63%
4%
38,468
20%
18%
4%
1%
70%
4%
59,718
22%
21%
5%
1%
70%
3%
120,514
31%
51%
18%
12%
62%
76%
13%
7%
4%
7%
56%
22%
13%
40%
62%
9%
15%
14%
46%
15%
80%
20%
34%
66%
01/12/2025 11:53 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
34 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
3 5
4 2
1 Gettysburg
ES
Red Bank ES
Cox ES
Dry Creek
ES
Clovis High
Jefferson
ES
Gateway ES
Oraze ES
Weldon ES
Tarpey ES
Buchanan
High
Garfield ES
Alta Sierra
MS
Heliport
FS
FS
FS
FS
Tollhouse
Rd
W
Shaw
Av
e
Temperance Ave
E Bullard Ave
W Sierra Ave
N Villa Ave
N Locan Ave
Sunnyside Ave
W Herndon Ave
E Alluvial Ave
Armstrong Ave
E Ashlan Ave
N Peach Ave
W
Barstow
Ave
W
G
ettysburg Ave
Clovis Ave
N Fowler Ave
Bernad
ine D
r
Willow Ave
E Shepherd Ave
N
ees
Ave
E Teague Ave
N Marion Ave
N Locan Ave
N Leonard Ave
N De Wolf Ave
N Highland Ave
Clovis 2025
Districting
National Demographics Corporation, January 12, 2025
Unpopulated, non-contiguous
area to the north is in District 1.
©2021 CALIPER
35 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
501
District 1
Total Pop 23,306
Deviation from ideal -786
% Deviation -3.26%
% Hisp 22.8%
% NH White 56%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 14%
Total 14,832
% Hisp 23%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 12%
Total 15,339
% Latino est. 19%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 68%
% NH Black 5%
Total 9,003
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 74%
% NH Black 5%
Total 13,380
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 74%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 22,346
age0-19 31%
age20-60 48%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 14%
naturalized 68%
english 76%
spanish 12%
asian-lang 6%
other lang 7%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 7%
hs-grad 49%
bachelor 27%
graduatedegree 18%
Child in Household child-under18 41%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 60%
income 0-25k 6%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 52%
income 200k-plus 22%
single family 84%
multi-family 16%
rented 27%
owned 73%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.
2 23,969
-123
-0.51%
25%
54%
3%
14%
15,896
20%
65%
3%
12%
15,097
21%
19%
6%
1%
68%
4%
8,723
17%
15%
4%
1%
74%
4%
12,708
18%
17%
5%
1%
73%
2%
23,869
32%
51%
17%
11%
72%
79%
10%
8%
4%
5%
50%
26%
18%
44%
64%
6%
9%
10%
52%
23%
90%
10%
26%
74%
3 23,602
-490
-2.03%
36%
48%
3%
8%
15,716
30%
61%
3%
5%
13,369
30%
27%
3%
1%
64%
2%
6,531
23%
20%
2%
1%
72%
2%
10,748
25%
24%
2%
1%
69%
3%
23,149
27%
52%
21%
11%
43%
75%
18%
5%
2%
9%
62%
17%
8%
30%
59%
14%
27%
20%
34%
5%
65%
35%
50%
50%
4 24,566
474

1.97%
27%
44%
3%
22%
15,873
28%
49%
4%
18%
15,591
27%
24%
8%
2%
58%
4%
8,201
23%
21%
6%
2%
65%
5%
12,304
23%
22%
7%
2%
67%
2%
25,698
33%
50%
17%
15%
62%
76%
10%
9%
5%
6%
54%
24%
14%
49%
64%
4%
9%
10%
58%
20%
99%
1%
12%
88%
5 25,018
926

3.84%
40%
39%
4%
12%
17,273
38%
45%
5%
12%
13,259
34%
31%
4%
1%
56%
5%
6,010
27%
24%
3%
1%
64%
5%
10,578
31%
28%
4%
1%
62%
4%
25,452
30%
54%
17%
10%
64%
76%
17%
6%
2%
7%
65%
18%
7%
39%
61%
16%
16%
19%
40%
9%
66%
34%
47%
53%
Total
120,461
1,712

7.11%
31%
48%
3%
14%
79,591
28%
56%
4%
12%
72,655
26%
23%
6%
1%
63%
4%
38,468
20%
18%
4%
1%
70%
4%
59,718
22%
21%
5%
1%
70%
3%
120,514
31%
51%
18%
12%
62%
76%
13%
7%
4%
7%
56%
22%
13%
40%
62%
9%
15%
14%
46%
15%
80%
20%
34%
66%
01/12/2025 11:54 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
36 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
3 5
4 1
2 Gettysburg
ES
Red Bank ES
Cox ES
Dry Creek
ES
Clovis High
Jefferson
ES
Gateway ES
Oraze ES
Weldon ES
Tarpey ES
Buchanan
High
Garfield ES
Alta Sierra
MS
Heliport
FS
FS
FS
FS
Tollhouse
Rd
W
Shaw
Av
e
Temperance Ave
E Bullard Ave
W Sierra Ave
N Villa Ave
N Locan Ave
Sunnyside Ave
W Herndon Ave
E Alluvial Ave
Armstrong Ave
E Ashlan Ave
N Peach Ave
W
Barstow
Ave
W
G
ettysburg Ave
Clovis Ave
N Fowler Ave
Bernad
ine D
r
Willow Ave
E Shepherd Ave
N
ees
Ave
E Teague Ave
N Marion Ave
N Locan Ave
N Leonard Ave
N De Wolf Ave
N Highland Ave
Clovis 2025
Districting
National Demographics Corporation, January 12, 2025
Unpopulated, non-contiguous
area to the north is in District 1.
©2021 CALIPER
37 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
502
District 1
Total Pop 24,353
Deviation from ideal 261
% Deviation 1.08%
% Hisp 24.0%
% NH White 55%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 14%
Total 16,488
% Hisp 21%
% NH White 64%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 13%
Total 15,645
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 69%
% NH Black 3%
Total 9,149
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 74%
% NH Black 4%
Total 13,077
% Latino est. 17%
% Spanish-Surnamed 16%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 75%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 24,901
age0-19 33%
age20-60 51%
age60plus 16%
immigrants 12%
naturalized 72%
english 79%
spanish 10%
asian-lang 8%
other lang 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 6%
hs-grad 49%
bachelor 28%
graduatedegree 19%
Child in Household child-under18 46%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 5%
income 25-50k 6%
income 50-75k 9%
income 75-200k 56%
income 200k-plus 24%
single family 92%
multi-family 8%
rented 23%
owned 77%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.
2 24,021
-71
-0.29%
24%
56%
3%
13%
15,322
23%
61%
5%
10%
15,194
21%
19%
6%
1%
67%
5%
8,661
16%
14%
4%
1%
73%
5%
13,179
17%
16%
5%
1%
74%
3%
22,480
29%
49%
23%
13%
65%
76%
12%
6%
6%
7%
51%
25%
17%
36%
60%
9%
14%
12%
46%
20%
79%
21%
33%
67%
3 23,139
-953
-3.96%
44%
37%
4%
10%
15,055
40%
46%
5%
9%
10,901
37%
33%
3%
1%
55%
4%
4,453
28%
26%
3%
1%
63%
5%
8,379
34%
31%
2%
1%
59%
5%
23,676
32%
53%
15%
11%
47%
72%
22%
5%
2%
9%
69%
13%
5%
36%
61%
20%
24%
23%
30%
4%
50%
50%
66%
34%
4 24,566
474

1.20%
34%
49%
2%
11%
16,853
29%
58%
3%
9%
15,324
28%
26%
4%
1%
64%
3%
8,004
23%
20%
3%
1%
70%
3%
12,779
24%
23%
3%
1%
69%
3%
23,759
27%
51%
22%
11%
63%
79%
12%
5%
3%
7%
58%
21%
10%
34%
61%
8%
18%
17%
46%
12%
84%
16%
29%
71%
Total
120,461
1,427

5.92%
31%
48%
3%
14%
79,591
28%
56%
4%
12%
72,655
26%
23%
6%
1%
63%
4%
38,468
20%
18%
4%
1%
70%
4%
59,718
22%
21%
5%
1%
70%
3%
120,514
31%
51%
18%
12%
62%
76%
13%
7%
4%
7%
56%
22%
13%
40%
62%
9%
15%
14%
46%
15%
80%
20%
34%
66%
01/12/2025 11:54 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
38 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
3 5
4 1
2 Gettysburg
ES
Red Bank ES
Cox ES
Dry Creek
ES
Clovis High
Jefferson
ES
Gateway ES
Oraze ES
Weldon ES
Tarpey ES
Buchanan
High
Garfield ES
Alta Sierra
MS
Heliport
FS
FS
FS
FS
Tollhouse
Rd
W
Shaw
Av
e
Temperance Ave
E Bullard Ave
W Sierra Ave
N Villa Ave
N Locan Ave
Sunnyside Ave
W Herndon Ave
E Alluvial Ave
Armstrong Ave
E Ashlan Ave
N Peach Ave
W
Barstow
Ave
W
G
ettysburg Ave
Clovis Ave
N Fowler Ave
Bernad
ine D
r
Willow Ave
E Shepherd Ave
N
ees
Ave
E Teague Ave
N Marion Ave
N Locan Ave
N Leonard Ave
N De Wolf Ave
N Highland Ave
Clovis 2025
Districting
National Demographics Corporation, January 12, 2025
Unpopulated, non-contiguous
area to the north is in District 1.
©2021 CALIPER
39 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
503
District 1
Total Pop 23,847
Deviation from ideal -245
% Deviation -1.02%
% Hisp 23.7%
% NH White 55%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 15%
Total 16,118
% Hisp 20%
% NH White 64%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 12%
Total 15,261
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 69%
% NH Black 3%
Total 8,934
% Latino est. 16%
% Spanish-Surnamed 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 74%
% NH Black 4%
Total 12,782
% Latino est. 17%
% Spanish-Surnamed 16%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 75%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 24,295
age0-19 33%
age20-60 51%
age60plus 16%
immigrants 12%
naturalized 72%
english 79%
spanish 10%
asian-lang 8%
other lang 3%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 6%
hs-grad 49%
bachelor 28%
graduatedegree 19%
Child in Household child-under18 46%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64%
income 0-25k 5%
income 25-50k 6%
income 50-75k 9%
income 75-200k 56%
income 200k-plus 24%
single family 93%
multi-family 7%
rented 22%
owned 78%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

3.35%
25%
55%
3%
13%
15,993
22%
62%
5%
10%
15,490
22%
19%
6%
1%
67%
5%
8,659
16%
15%
4%
1%
73%
5%
13,260
18%
17%
5%
1%
73%
3%
23,595
29%
49%
23%
13%
64%
76%
12%
5%
6%
6%
53%
23%
16%
36%
59%
11%
15%
13%
43%
18%
75%
25%
36%
64%
3 23,595
-497
-2.06%
43%
37%
4%
11%
15,218
40%
45%
4%
11%
11,549
37%
33%
3%
1%
54%
4%
4,756
30%
27%
3%
1%
62%
4%
8,962
34%
31%
3%
1%
60%
3%
22,379
29%
56%
16%
11%
53%
73%
19%
6%
2%
8%
70%
14%
5%
36%
61%
18%
17%
23%
38%
3%
61%
39%
56%
44%
4 24,086
-6
-0.02%
27%
45%
3%
21%
16,462
27%
51%
5%
17%
15,661
26%
24%
8%
2%
59%
5%
8,420
22%
20%
5%
2%
65%
6%
12,443
22%
21%
7%
2%
67%
2%
26,045
33%
49%
18%
15%
62%
78%
9%
8%
5%
5%
52%
26%
15%
47%
63%
4%
10%
9%
55%
21%
99%
1%
12%
88%
5 24,034
-58
-0.24%
33%
49%
2%
11%
15,800
33%
56%
3%
8%
14,694
27%
25%
4%
1%
64%
2%
7,698
21%
19%
3%
1%
71%
3%
12,271
24%
23%
3%
1%
69%
3%
24,200
31%
50%
20%
12%
59%
75%
16%
6%
3%
9%
59%
20%
9%
36%
62%
8%
23%
17%
41%
11%
75%
25%
39%
61%
Total
120,461
1,304

5.41%
31%
48%
3%
14%
79,591
28%
56%
4%
12%
72,655
26%
23%
6%
1%
63%
4%
38,468
20%
18%
4%
1%
70%
4%
59,718
22%
21%
5%
1%
70%
3%
120,514
31%
51%
18%
12%
62%
76%
13%
7%
4%
7%
56%
22%
13%
40%
62%
9%
15%
14%
46%
15%
80%
20%
34%
66%
01/12/2025 11:55 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
40 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
5 4
2 3
1 Gettysburg
ES
Red Bank ES
Cox ES
Dry Creek
ES
Clovis High
Jefferson
ES
Gateway ES
Oraze ES
Weldon ES
Tarpey ES
Buchanan
High
Garfield ES
Alta Sierra
MS
Heliport
FS
FS
FS
FS
Tollhouse
Rd
W
Shaw
Av
e
Temperance Ave
E Bullard Ave
W Sierra Ave
N Villa Ave
N Locan Ave
Sunnyside Ave
W Herndon Ave
E Alluvial Ave
Armstrong Ave
E Ashlan Ave
N Peach Ave
W
Barstow
Ave
W
G
ettysburg Ave
Clovis Ave
N Fowler Ave
Bernad
ine D
r
Willow Ave
E Shepherd Ave
N
ees
Ave
E Teague Ave
N Marion Ave
N Locan Ave
N Leonard Ave
N De Wolf Ave
N Highland Ave
National Demographics Corporation, January 12, 2025
Unpopulated, non-contiguous
area to the north is in District 1.

Clovis 2025
Districting
Not population balanced.

Not contiguous.

Not compact.
©2021 CALIPER
41 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
504
District 1
Total Pop 21,805
Deviation from ideal -2,287
% Deviation -9.49%
% Hisp 20.2%
% NH White 58%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 16%
Total 14,781
% Hisp 19%
% NH White 64%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 13%
Total 14,882
% Latino est. 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 16%
% Asian-Surnamed 7%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 69%
% NH Black 4%
Total 8,849
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 75%
% NH Black 5%
Total 12,849
% Latino est. 15%
% Spanish-Surnamed 14%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 75%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 22,541
age0-19 32%
age20-60 48%
age60plus 20%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 68%
english 77%
spanish 9%
asian-lang 7%
other lang 7%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 7%
hs-grad 45%
bachelor 30%
graduatedegree 19%
Child in Household child-under18 44%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 60%
income 0-25k 5%
income 25-50k 7%
income 50-75k 8%
income 75-200k 51%
income 200k-plus 29%
single family 91%
multi-family 9%
rented 20%
owned 80%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey and Special Tabulation data.
2 21,369
-2,723
-11.30%
30%
44%
3%
18%
13,916
27%
52%
4%
16%
13,647
28%
25%
7%
2%
58%
4%
7,148
24%
22%
5%
2%
64%
5%
10,584
25%
23%
6%
2%
66%
2%
22,017
33%
48%
18%
14%
61%
78%
9%
8%
5%
5%
53%
24%
15%
46%
63%
6%
10%
11%
55%
18%
99%
1%
12%
88%
3 26,618
2,526

10.48%
25%
50%
3%
18%
17,453
25%
55%
4%
16%
16,453
23%
20%
7%
2%
65%
3%
9,228
19%
17%
5%
1%
71%
4%
14,040
19%
18%
6%
2%
71%
2%
26,709
32%
51%
18%
14%
70%
77%
10%
10%
4%
6%
55%
25%
13%
46%
63%
5%
9%
11%
54%
21%
93%
7%
20%
80%
4 23,963
-129
-0.54%
32%
52%
2%
9%
15,913
30%
61%
3%
5%
14,960
27%
24%
3%
1%
65%
3%
7,953
21%
19%
3%
1%
72%
4%
12,259
23%
22%
3%
1%
71%
3%
23,184
28%
51%
21%
11%
56%
76%
18%
5%
2%
9%
57%
19%
13%
33%
63%
9%
21%
16%
43%
11%
77%
23%
38%
62%
5 26,706
2,614

10.85%
43%
39%
4%
10%
17,528
38%
48%
4%
9%
12,713
36%
32%
3%
1%
56%
4%
5,290
28%
25%
3%
1%
64%
5%
9,986
32%
30%
2%
1%
62%
4%
26,063
29%
55%
16%
11%
51%
74%
20%
5%
2%
7%
69%
14%
5%
34%
61%
19%
22%
23%
34%
3%
51%
49%
65%
35%
Total
120,461
5,337

22.15%
31%
48%
3%
14%
79,591
28%
56%
4%
12%
72,655
26%
23%
6%
1%
63%
4%
38,468
20%
18%
4%
1%
70%
4%
59,718
22%
21%
5%
1%
70%
3%
120,514
31%
51%
18%
12%
62%
76%
13%
7%
4%
7%
56%
22%
13%
40%
62%
9%
15%
14%
46%
15%
80%
20%
34%
66%
01/12/2025 11:55 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2022)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
42 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

Attachment 4
City of Clovis
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612

**PLEASE POST**

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

The City of Clovis will hold a public hearing on January 21, 2025, to gather public input on “draft” election district maps.

The City Council of the City of Clovis is currently elected under an “at-large” election system, where Council members are elected by voters of the entire City. On October 7, 2024, the Council approved beginning the process to establish district-based elections beginning in 2026 in response to a threat of litigation related to the City’s current at-large election system. In a district-based election system, each Council member must reside within the designated election district boundary and is elected only by the voters in that district. The Council has published “draft” district maps for the City Council’s and public’s consideration. The maps are available for viewing at the City’s website:
https://cityofclovis.com/government/city-clerk/districts/.

On January 21, 2025, the City Council will hold a third public hearing to gather public input on the “draft” election district maps in accordance with Elections Code section 10010.

The public hearing is scheduled as follows:

DATE TIME LOCATION
Tuesday,
January 21, 2025
6:05 p.m. or as
soon thereafter as
possible
City of Clovis City Council’s
Council Chamber
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612

The public is invited to participate and make comments during the public hearing. If you have any questions regarding this public hearing, please contact Briana Parra, City Clerk at 559-324-2060 or [email protected].

43 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

Page 1 of 3 ends

CLOVIS CITY COUNCIL MEETING

January 13, 2025 6:00 P.M. Council Chamber

Meeting called to order by Mayor Mouanoutoua at 6:01
Flag Salute led by Councilmember Basgall

Roll Call: Present: Councilmembers Ashbeck, Basgall, Pearce Mayor Mouanoutoua

Absent: Councilmember Bessinger

PRESENTATION – 6:02

6:02 – ITEM 1 - Presentation of Proclamation Honoring the Life of Mouage Mouanoutoua.

PUBLIC COMMENTS – 6:10

Upon call, there was no public comment.

CONSENT CALENDAR – 6:10

Upon call, there was no public comment.

Motion by Councilmember Ashbeck, seconded by Councilmember Pearce, that the items on t he Consent Calendar be approved . Motion carried by 4-0-1 vote; with Councilmember Bessinger absent.

2. Administration - Approval - Minutes from the January 6, 2025, Council Meeting.

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS – 6:10

6:10 ITEM 3 - Workshop – Discussion on the potential transition of the City of Clovis to a Charter City.

Brian Wilson, resident, addressed concerns about the increased power a charter city would give the Council, particularly regarding taxes, and suggested forming a Charter commission with elected members to oversee the process.

Carl Roberts, resident, inquired about the list of charter cities in California and whether any had reverted to general law status.

Jenny Krens, resident, raised concerns about the potential legal costs and the risks of engaging in legal battles with the state, questioning the wisdom of pursuing a charter.

44 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

Page 2 of 3 ends

Steven Trevino, resident, asked why the City is considering transitioning to a charter.

Mike Carlson, resident, spoke regarding the benefits of local control and the opportunity to challenge state authority.

The Council directed staff to come back to Council with a detailed analysis of the pros and cons of transitioning to a charter city, focusing on local control, legal implications, and areas like housing, voter ID laws, prevailing wage laws, and municipal f ines. The Council emphasized the importance of understanding the long-term strategy for the City of Clovis, including tax authority, legal costs, and the experiences of other Charter cities.

COUNCIL ITEMS - 6:50

6:50 ITEM 4 - Consider Approval – Various City Council Committee Appointments.

Upon call, there was no public comment.

The following appointments were made to the City Council Committees with a term two - year term:

1. Airport Land Use Committee – Councilmember Lynne Ashbeck (Member).

2. City Selection Committee – Mayor Vong Mouanoutoua (Member) and Mayor Pro Tem Diane Pearce (Alternate) with a term ending December 2026.

3. Council of Fresno County Governments (COG) - Mayor Vong Mouanoutoua (Member) and Mayor Pro Tem Diane Pearce (Alternate).

4. Fresno Conty Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee Agency - Mayor Vong Mouanoutoua (Member) and Mayor Pro Tem Diane Pearce (Member).

5. Fresno County Transportation Authority Board (FCTA) – Councilmember Lynne Ashbeck (Member) with a term ending January 2027.

6. Joint Subcommittee on School Issues – Councilmember Lynne Ashbeck (Member) and Mayor Pro Tem Diane Pearce (Member) with a term ending December 2026.

7. North Kings Groundwater Sustainability Agency (NKGSA) Board of Directors – Councilmember Matt Basgall (M ember), and Councilmember Drew Bessinger (Alternate)

Motion for approval by Councilmember Ashbeck, seconded by Councilmember Basgall.

Motion carried by 4-0-1 vote; with Councilmember Bessinger absent.

CITY MANAGER COMMENTS – 7:01

City Manager Haussler thanked the community for attending the January 9, 2025, district map workshop, reminded everyone of the upcoming Council District map public hearing on January 21, 2025, and congratulated Paul Armendariz on his recent appointment as Interim Assistant City Manager.
45 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

Page 3 of 3 ends

COUNCIL COMMENTS – 7:02

There was consensus of the Council to move forward with a proclamation for Russell Ralph Crow, a Clovis resident turning 104 in April, and to bring it back to the Council for formal presentation.

ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Mouanoutoua adjourned the meeting of the Council to January 21, 2025.

Meeting adjourned: 7:02 p.m.

______________________________ ________________________________ Mayor City Clerk
46 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: General Services Department
DATE: January 21, 2025
SUBJECT: General Services - Approval – Res. 25-___, Authorizing Amendments to the City’s Classification and Compensation Plans to Adop t the Police Records Specialist I Classification with a Salary Range of $4,790 to $5,823 per month, Police Records Specialist II Classification with a Salary Range of $5,292 to $6,433 per month and the Senior P olice Records Specialist Classification with a Salary Range of $5,878 to $7,145 per month and Approval – Res. 25-___, Amending the City’s FY 24-25 Position Allocation Plan to Delete Seven (7) P rincipal Office Assistant Positions and Two (2) Administrative Assistant Positions, and adding Seven (7) Police Records Specialist I Positions and Two (2) Senior Police Records Specialist Positions within the Police Department.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Res. 25-____ Classification and Compensation Plan

2. Res. 25-____ Position Allocation Plan

RECOMMENDATION
For City Council to approve a resolution authorizing amendments to the City’s Classification and Compensation Plans by adopting the Police Records Specialist I Classification with a Salary Range of $4,790 to $5,823 per month, Police Records Specialist II Classification with a Salary Range of $5,292 to $6,433 per month and the Senior Police Records Specialist Classification with a Salary Range of $5,878 to $7,145 per month and approve a resolution amending the City’s FY 24-25 Position Allocation Plan by deleting seven (7) Principal Office Assistant Positions and two (2) Administrative Assistant Positions and adding Seven (7) Police Records Specialist I Positions and two (2) Senior Police Records Specialist Positions within the Police Department

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A recent classification study of the positions in the Records Division within the Police Department concluded that current classifications would need to be updated to reflect current job duties and certification requirements. It is recommended that the City’s Classification, Compensation, and Position Allocation Plans be adjusted to provide for the Police Records Specialist I, Police Records Specialist II, and the Senior Police Records Specialist Classifications. Modification of the City’s Classification, Compensation, and Position Allocation Plans requires City Council’s approval.

47 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

BACKGROUND
At the request of the Police Department, a study was conducted on several classifications within the Records Division. The study specifically focused on the classifications of Principal Office Assistant and Administrative Assistant, which are responsible f or performing duties within the Records Division. The review revealed that these classifications needed to be retitled in order to align with the titles used by other agencies for similar roles.

As a result, the Department has determined the need for an a dditional classification: Police Records Specialist II. This new position will provide opportunities for career growth and help with retention. Over time, the duties within the Records Division have expanded to meet the increasing demands of technology and specialized statistical reporting for the Department of Justice. The current and proposed classifications and salary ranges are as follows:

Current Classifications:
 Principal Office Assistant: $4,790 to $5,823
 Administrative Assistant: $5,763 to $7,006

New Proposed Classifications:
 Police Records Specialist I: $4,790 to $5,823
 Police Records Specialist II: $5,292 to $6,433
 Senior Police Records Specialist: $5,878 to $7,145

The seven (7) Principal Office Assistant positions in the Records Division will be reclassified as Police Records Specialist 1 positions, while the two (2) Administrative Assistant positions will be reclassified to Senior Police Records Specialist positions. The salary for the Senior Police Records Specialist will be slightly higher th an that of the Administrative Assistant to reflect the increased level of responsibility. This reorganization will allow the Department to attract candidates interested in law enforcement careers. The proposed reclassifications will require modifications to the City’s Classification, Compensation, and Position Allocation Plans, which will need approval from the City Council.

Finally, it is recommended that the Police Records Specialist I, Police Records Specialist II, and Senior Police Records Specialist classifications be assigned to the C lovis Public Safety Employees Association (CPSEA) bargaining unit for representation. The C lovis Employees Association (CEA) has been informed that the employees in the Records Division will be moved to the CPSEA bargaining unit. Representatives from both CEA and CPSEA have been consulted about the proposed classifications and their assignment to the CPSEA bargaining unit, and both agree with staff's recommendations.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact of salary and benefits for the remainder of FY 24-25 is approximately an additional $ 1,400. There are adequate funds in the Police Department budget to co ver the additional cost for the salary increase for the Senior position this fiscal year.

48 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
The recommended changes to the City’s Classification, Compensation, and Position Allocation Plans better suit the staffing needs of the Police Department. Modification of the City’s Classification, Compensation, and Position Allocation Plans require City Council’s approval.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The City’s Classification, Compensation, and Position Allocation Plans will be updated to include the new Police Records Specialist I, Police Records Specialist II, and Senior Police Records Specialist classifications. Six (6) incumbents in the Principal Office Assistant classification will be reclassified to Police Records Specialist I, one (1) vacant Principal Office Assistant position will be converted to a Police Records Specialist I position, and two (2) incumbents in the Administrative Assistant classification will be reclassified to the Senior Police Records Specialist position within the Police Records Division.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

Prepared by: Lori Shively, Deputy General Services Director

Reviewed by: City Manager AH

49 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

RESOLUTION 25-___

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLANS BY

ADOPTING THE POLICE RECORDS SPECIALIST I, POLICE RECORDS SPECIALIST II

AND THE SENIOR POLICE RECORDS SPECIALIST CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE

POLICE DEPARTMENT

WHEREAS, it has been determined that the City has a need to adopt the Police Records Specialist I, Police Records Specialist II, and the Senior Police Records Specialist Classifications to provide the necessary support to the Records Division within the Police Department; and

WHEREAS, it has been determined that the appropriate salary ranges are as follows:

Police Records Specialist I, $4,790 to $5,823 per month; Police Records Specialist II, $5,292 to $6,433 per month; and Senior Police Records Specialist, $5,878 to $7,175 per month ; and

WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is appropriate to assign the Police Records Specialist I, Police Records Specialist II, and the Senior Police Records Specialist to the Clovis Public Safety Employees Association (CPSEA) Bargaining Group.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Clovis will modify the City’s Classification and Compensation Plans to include the Police Records Specialist I with a monthly salary range of $4,790 to $5,823, Police Records Specialist II with a monthly salary range of $5,292 to 6,433, and the Sen ior Police Records Specialist with a monthly salary range of $5,878 to $7,175 (Attachment A).

* * * * *

The foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on January 21, 2025, by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Dated: January 21, 2025

___________________________ __________________________ Mayor City Clerk

ATTACHMENT 1 50
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

Attachment A

POLICE RECORDS SPECIALIST I
Monthly Salary $4,790 to $5,823

DEFINITION
Under general supervision, to perform a wide variety of difficult and specialized clerical work in support of the Records Division of the Police Department; including the maintenance of records and files, processing of data and reports, critical time-sensitive data entry, providing support to sworn personnel, and providing information to the public, outside agencies and departmental staff; and to perform related work as required.

CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
The Police Records Specialist I performs assigned duties under immediate supervision while learning related policies and procedures. Positions in this class are distinguished from the Police Records Specialist II by the performance of less than the full range of duties assigned to the Police Records Specialis t II. Positions in this class carry continuing responsibility for varied and complex clerical operations, where work procedures or methods must be independently selected or devised and provide administrative assistance to a Division Head.

Work requires con siderable judgment in assembling and evaluating information in the coordination of work. Instructions given by supervisors generally do not provide all the information needed to complete the assignment. Incumbents are expected to resolve most problems conf ronted through the application of judgment and precedent, referring to the supervisor only those that involve the establishment of new procedures and policies.

Positions in the Records Division may require that the employee work rotating shifts, weekends, and holidays. Incumbents are required to maintain strict confidentiality as it relates to all aspects of the Police Department.

EXAMPLES OF DUTIES
Receive, stamp, copy, and distribute police reports; receive and process requests for reports, ensure release of information complies with State Laws, copy, redact, and collate reports, and compile criminal histories of defendants; prepare, copy, and distribute subpoenas for court liaison; receive incoming warrants from the court and review to ensure that complete and accurate information is provided to officers, law enforcement agencies and the courts, prepare and distribute notifications for warrants to field officers for service, maintain accurate records and update warrant s tatus in computer systems; access and interact with all police databases, NCIC/CLETS and DMV computer terminals and work with other allied agencies; automated data systems; input a variety of critical and public safety - related materials through law enforcement computer systems and check output for accuracy; prepare and process complex materials which may require some analysis of source material and a thorough understanding and familiarity with policies, procedures, terminology and various applicable laws in order to obtain the necessary data; provide clerical and administrative support to a division head; compile a variety of narrative and/or statistical reports, locating sources of information, devising forms to secure data and determining proper format for finished reports; review for accuracy and conformity to established procedures the work of others who are performing related operations in the work process; 51 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.
design forms, work out improvements in procedures and participate in the reorganization of work procedures and assignments from procedural or ordinance changes; coordinate the flow of information to other divisions; coordinate the efforts of and participate fully in the work of office support staff; perform the more difficult clerical work; train offi ce staff; prepare correspondence, statistical data and reports as required; answer questions that involve searching for and abstracting data and detailed explanations; make appointments, screen callers, screen correspondence, initiate replies to routine co rrespondence, assemble information from a variety of sources, requisition supplies, materials and equipment, prepare schedules, prepare cases for filing with the court and the District Attorney’s office and relieve supervisor of routine office details; rep ort to supervisor problems encountered in the coordination of work; call for purchase order numbers; log and file a variety of records; prepare payroll documents; receive and respond to emergency calls; operate a radio; type agendas and legal descriptions; record official documents; prepare bids and bid summaries; maintain budget expenditure files; operate City vehicles to perform court runs to various courthouses, City Attorney’s office, other law enforcement agencies and training facilities, to attend local and out of area training, and to complete department errands needed for the operation of the facility; and perform related work as required.

TYPICAL QUALIFICATIONS

LICENSE REQUIRED
 Possession of a valid Class C California Driver's License and a good driving record.  Must complete the D.O.J. training for full access operator and obtain the Records Clerk certification from California POST within six months of appointment.

EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE
 High School diploma or equivalent.

AND
 Three years of increasingly responsible clerical experience.

QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of:
 Applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, and regulations including the Public Records Act;
 Computer terminal operating methods and office software;  Modern o ffice methods and procedures, including the preparation of business correspondence and reports, filing, and standard office equipment operation;  Correct English usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation;  Basic mathematics;
 Advanced record-keeping methods.

 Establish and maintain effective working relationships with coworkers, other agencies, and the public;
 Operate a computer keyboard skillfully;
 Ability to type at a corrected speed of 45 words per minute;  Remain calm in emergencies;
 Organize and prioritize work assignments;
 Train less experienced staff in assigned areas of activity;  Operate a vehicle observing legal and defensive driving practices;  Learn and apply the standards and methods of law enforcement records distribution;  Perform clerical work involving independent judgment and requiring accuracy and speed.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING CONDITIONS
Work is primarily sedentary. Position requires prolonged sitting, standing, walking, reaching, twisting, turning, kneeling, bending, squatting, and stooping in the performance of daily office activities. This position also requires grasping, repetitive hand movement, and fine coordination in preparing reports and retrieving and entering data using a computer keyboard. Additionally, the position requires near and far vision in reading work -related documents and using a computer, and acute hearing is required when providing telephone and face -to-face service. The need to lift, drag, and push files, paper, and documents weighing up to 25 pounds is also required. The incumbent may be required to attend periodic evening meetings. Incumbents are required to travel within and out of the city to attend meetings.

53 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

City of Clovis

POLICE RECORDS SPECIALIST II
Monthly Salary $5,292 to $6,433

DEFINITION
Under direction, perform responsible work and provide technical data; may recommend policies, procedures, systems, and methods for the improvement of the operations, services, or programs of the department served; perform a wide variety of advanced technic al and law enforcement office support services including but not limited to; typing, public service, record keeping, and information processing duties of moderate difficulty, which involve accessing and interacting responsibly with information generated fr om City and other law enforcement related computer files and databases; and to perform related work as required.

CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
Positions in this class are distinguished from the Police Records Specialist I by their specialization in digital evidence, including Body Worn Camera (BWC), Public Records Act requests, subpoenas, NIBRS statistical reporting, and record keeping. Incumbents access computer-generated information to write reports, maintain City records, and respond to requests for law enforc ement-specific information from the public. Work requires thorough knowledge of the procedures of the office and the use of independent judgment within a set of established guidelines and parameters. Incumbents may be required to implement and coordinate specific procedures on a department level or to assist in such implementation at an agency level. Positions in this class have considerable independence in selecting work methods from a variety of standard methods or procedures. Instructions given by supervisors generally do not provide all the information needed to complete assignments.

Incumbents are expected to resolve most problems confronted through the application of judgment and precedent, referring to the supervisor only those that involve the establishment of new procedures and policies. Positions in the Records Division may require that the employee work rotating shifts, weekends, and holidays. Incumbents are required to maintain strict confidentiality as it relates to all aspects of the Police Department.

EXAMPLES OF DUTIES
Review and redact videos and ensure the release is following federal, state, and local statutes, and established policies and procedures; oversee the external digital media processes including uploading, storing, archiving, and purging; research, develop, and maintain records, reports, data analysis, and other documentation related to assigned functions; provide comprehensive documentation regarding department -issued media systems; develop and conduct digital media training and o ther training for department personnel; conduct routine functionality audits and implement compliance measures to ensure video evidence is properly uploaded, maintained, and purged following policies and procedures; review and assist in the implementation and updating of policies and procedures; act as a liaison with vendors and advise department personnel on equipment upgrades and any concerns or issues related to their equipment; respond to inquiries from the public, public officials, City employees, or o ther individuals requesting assistance or public information and serve as a liaison with the District Attorney’s office and other agencies; provide technical support to department staff and assist personnel in the use of digital media software; testify in court regarding department media systems security and protocols; maintain competency in best practices, standards, measures, and emerging trends related to video digital evidence; answer telephones; respond to questions from the 54 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

public regarding requests f or confidential information; make referrals to other public agencies when appropriate; access and interact with all police databases, NCIC/CLETS and DMV computer terminals and work with other allied agencies’ automated data systems; access and interact wit h City computer files of police reports; type reports from compiled data; certify and verify citation violations; process, distribute, and file police reports; process complaints for referral to animal control; release reports and information within guidelines of state laws; store and release evidence in compliance with all laws; maintain the confidentiality of all information processed during the course of work; index, select, cross reference and arrange records, documents and correspondence in files and storage areas; verify documents are recorded in accordance with regulation; act as a receptionist at departmental reception areas and furnish routine information regarding specific departmental procedures and practices; photocopy as required; prepare cases for filing with the court and the District Attorney’s office, coordinate service of subpoenas, maintain departmental forms, supplies and equipment as necessary; operate City vehicles to perform court runs to various courthouses, City Attorney’s office, oth er law enforcement agencies and training facilities, to attend local and out of area training, and to complete department errands needed for the operation of the facility; and perform related work as required.

TYPICAL QUALIFICATIONS
LICENSE and CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED
 Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License and a good driving record.  Must complete the D.O.J. training for full access operator and obtain the Records Clerk Certification from California POST within six months of appointment.

EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE
 Associate degree or completion of 60 semester units or 90 quarter units from an accredited college or university with major coursework in Business Administration, Public Administration, Criminal Justice or a closely related field.

AND

 Two (2) years of progressively responsible experience working in a Police or Sheriff’s Department Records Division or a closely related field performing administrative or clerical duties including at least one (1) year involving responsibility for the performance of highly specialized and technical duties.

QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of:
 Operate digital media systems including BWC and equipment;  Troubleshoot and instruct users in technical areas;
 Policies and procedures used in complex record keeping including filing, indexing, and cross-referencing;
 Automated law enforcement information systems and procedures;  Applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, and regulations including the Public Records Act, NIBRS statistical reporting;
 Computer terminal operating methods and office software; 55 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

 Modern office methods and procedures, including the preparation of business correspondence and reports, filing, and standard office equipment operation;  Correct English usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation;  Basic mathematics;
 Advanced record-keeping methods;
 Equipment procurement methods.

Ability to:
 Receive and give information over the telephone or in public professionally and courteously;
 Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing;  Understand and follow oral and written directions;
 Read, interpret, and apply rules, policies, laws and terminology;  Utilize considerable discretion in handling confidential data;  Prepare and maintain accurate records and reports with speed and accuracy;  Operate standard office equipment, including a computer terminal and a CLETS terminal;
 Establish and maintain effective working relationships with coworkers, other agencies, and the public;
 Operate a computer keyboard skillfully;
 Remain calm in emergencies;
 Organize and prioritize work assignments;
 Train less experienced staff in assigned areas of activity;  Operate a vehicle observing legal and defensive driving practices;  Learn and apply the standards and methods of law enforcement records distribution;  Perform clerical work involving independent judgment and requiring accuracy and speed.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING CONDITIONS

Work is primarily sedentary. Position requires prolonged sitting, standing, walking, reaching, twisting, turning, kneeling, bending, squatting, and stooping in the performance of daily office activities. This position also requires grasping, repetitive hand movement, and fine coordination in prepa ring reports and retrieving and entering data using a computer keyboard. Additionally, the position requires near and far vision in reading work -related documents and using a computer, and acute hearing is required when providing telephone and face -to-face service. The need to lift, drag, and push files, paper, and documents weighing up to 25 pounds is also required. The incumbent may be required to attend periodic evening meetings. Incumbents are required to travel within and out of the city to attend meetings.

56 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

City of Clovis

SENIOR POLICE RECORDS SPECIALIST
Monthly Salary $5,878 to $7,145

DEFINITION
Under direction, oversee and perform a wide variety of administrative, technical, and clerical records support duties in the Records Division of the Police Department, including maintenance of records and files, critical time -sensitive data entry, processi ng of data and reports, providing support to sworn personnel, and providing information to the public, outside agencies, and departmental staff; provide lead supervision to division staff including planning, prioritizing and assigning work; and perform related work as required.

CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
The Senior Police Records Specialist is the first-line supervisory and advanced journey level classification in the Records Specialist series. This classification is distinguished from the Records Specialist I/II classifications in that the latter are the entry and journey levels in the series, while the former acts in a lead capacity over a given shift or function within a specialized assignment while participating fully in the assigned work. Incumbents plan, organize, and direct office support staff. Incumbents perform a wide variety of staff support functions for a department head and division managers, including creating, reviewing, and revising operating policies, procedures, regulations, assisting with digital evidence, including Body Worn Camera (BWC), Public Records Act requests, subpoenas, and record keeping.

Incumbents access computer-generated information to write reports, maintain City records, and respond to requests for law enforcement -specific inf ormation from the public.

Incumbents interact with Council and Commission members and with officials of other agencies to receive and transmit information and coordinate schedules. Work is generally reviewed upon completion for results and incumbents are r esponsible for office support goals, priorities, schedules, and procedures are expected to refer to the supervisor for instruction matters which do not fit a clear pattern or require policy direction. Positions in the Records Division may require that the employee work rotating shifts, weekends, and holidays. Incumbents are required to maintain strict confidentiality as it relates to all aspects of the Police Department.

EXAMPLES OF DUTIES
Perform difficult work requiring an understanding of departmental and specialized functions; input a variety of critical and public law enforcement -related materials through law enforcement computer systems and check output for accuracy; conduct required California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) entries , checks, and audits following applicable laws, statutes, and Department of Justice requirements, and prepare related paperwork for authorized release transactions; carefully review computer data for accuracy and correct errors within required timeframes to ensure compliance with state and local computer systems mandates; establish and maintain systems to ensure accountability and control; coordinate incoming correspondence and visitors; disseminate information and make referrals to the appropriate authorit ies; research and compile confidential and other data for staff and officials; assemble data into proposed budget; assemble and organize agendas; compose and prepare correspondence, complex reports, resolutions, contracts and other documents; verify and en ter departmental payroll information; establish record keeping systems; provide information to the public and staff regarding City operations and established administrative policies and procedures; assist in the oversight of departmental 57 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

and division programs; provide for the training of assigned staff in proper and safe operating procedures and methods; assist in developing written manuals and instructions; instruct assigned staff in new operating procedures and methods; research inquiries from staff and the public, compile information and provide response; conduct surveys and studies by gathering, compiling, tabulating and reporting data for inclusion in various reports or surveys; schedule meetings, appointments and travel arrangements; make arrangements for official City functions; take and transcribe minutes of meetings as required; ensure that office support details such as supply inventory, office equipment maintenance and relief coverage are properly addressed; operate City vehicles to perform court runs to various courthouses, City Attorney’s office, other law enforcement agencies and training facilities, to attend local and out of area training, and to complete department errands needed for the operation of the facility; and perform related work as required.

TYPICAL QUALIFICATIONS

LICENSE REQUIRED
 Possession of a valid Class C California Driver's License and a good driving record.

EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE
 Graduation from an accredited college or university with a Bachelor's Degree in Public Administration, Business Administration, Criminal Justice, Finance, or a closely related field.

AND

 Three (3) years of administrative, clerical, or related experience working in a Police or Sheriff’s Department Records Division or a closely related field.

QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of:
 Principles and practices of supervision, organization, and management;  Principles and practices of budgeting;
 Research and statistical methods;
 Organization and operation of the city and outside agencies as necessary to assume assigned responsibilities;
 Applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, and regulations including Public Records Act;
 Computer terminal operating methods and office software;  Operate digital media systems including BWC and equipment;  Troubleshoot and instruct users in technical areas;
 Policies and procedures used in complex record keeping including filing, indexing, and cross-referencing;
 Automated law enforcement information systems and procedures;  Modern office methods and procedures, including the preparation of business correspondence and reports, filing, and standard office equipment operation;  Correct English usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation;  Basic mathematics;
 Advanced record-keeping methods;
58 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

 Equipment procurement methods.

Ability to:
 Supervise staff in the performance of daily work duties;  Collect, compile, analyze, and interpret statistical data;  Prepare clear and concise reports;
 Work cooperatively with others to interpret, and apply policies, rules, and regulations;  Apply municipal finance, budgeting, and accounting methods, practices, and principles;
 Use initiative and sound independent judgment within established guidelines;  Analyze and resolve varied office administrative issues;  Receive and give information over the telephone or in public professionally and courteously;
 Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing;  Understand and follow oral and written directions;
 Read, interpret, and apply and apply rules, policies, laws, rules, and terminology;  Utilize considerable discretion in handling confidential data;  Prepare and maintain accurate records and reports with speed and accuracy;  Operate standard office equipment, including a computer terminal, a CLETS terminal, and specialized software packages;
 Establish and maintain effective working relationships with coworkers, city staff other agencies, and the public;
 Operate a computer keyboard skillfully;
 Remain calm in emergencies;
 Organize and prioritize work assignments;
 Train less experienced staff in assigned areas of activity;  Operate a vehicle observing legal and defensive driving practices;  Learn and apply the standards and methods of law enforcement records distribution;  Perform clerical work involving independent judgment and requiring accuracy and speed.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING CONDITIONS
Work is primarily sedentary. Position requires prolonged sitting, standing, walking, reaching, twisting, turning, kneeling, bending, squatting, and stooping in the performance of daily office activities. This position also requires grasping, repetitive hand movement, and fine coordination in preparing reports and retrieving and entering da ta using a computer keyboard. Additionally, the position requires near and far vision in reading work -related documents and using a computer, and acute hearing is required when providing telephone and face -to-face service. The need to lift, drag, and push files, paper, and documents weighing up to 25 pounds is also required. The incumbent may be required to attend periodic evening meetings. Incumbents are required to travel within and out of the city to attend meetings.

59 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION 25-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY’S FY 24-25 POSITION ALLOCATION PLAN

WHEREAS, the FY 2 4-25 Position Allocation Plan in the Police Department was approved as part of the FY 24-25 City Budget adoption process; and

WHEREAS, a review of the staffing needs for the Records Division within the Police Department indicates that the addition of seven (7) Police Records Specialist 1 positions and two (2) Senior Police Records Specialist positions and the deletion of seven (7) Principal Office Assistant positions and two (2) Administrative Assistant positions is necessary in order to provide the support needed for the Police Department; and

WHEREAS, amending the City’s adopted FY 2 4-25 Position Allocation Plan requires City Council authorization.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Clovis that the City’s FY 2 4-25 Position Allocation Plan shall be amended as noted in Attachment A.

* * * * *

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on January 21, 2025, by the following vote, to wit.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

60 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

ATTACHMENT A
POSITION ALLOCATION ADJUSTMENT BY DEPARTMENT FY 24-25

DEPARTMENT NUMBER OF POSITIONS

Police Department-Records Division

Add: Police Records Specialist 1 7.0
Add: Senior Police Records Specialist 2.0

Delete: Principal Office Assistant 7.0
Delete: Administrative Assistant 2.0

61 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services
DATE: January 21, 2025
SUBJECT: Consider various items associated with approximately 201 acres on the east side of N orth Minnewawa Avenue, between East Behymer and Shepherd Avenues. Multiple, owners; Lennar Homes , applicant; Yamabe & Horn Engineering Inc., representative.
a. Consider Approval - Res. 2 5-__, TM6375, A resolution of the City Council approving a vesting tentative tract map for a 385-lot single-family planned residential development on approximately 58.9 acres of land. b. Consider Approval - Res. 25-__, PDP2024-001, A resolution of the City Council approving a planned development permit for a 38 5-lot single-family residential development.
c. Consider Approval - Res. 2 5-___, RO310, A resolution of the City Council approving an application for the annexation of the territory known as the Shepherd -Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization area (approximately 201 acres).

Staff: Liz Salazar, Associate Planner
Recommendation: Approve

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution TM6375

2. Draft Resolution PDP2024-001

3. Draft Resolution RO310

4. December 16, 2024, City Council Staff Report

5. Proposed Development Standards for PDP2024-001

6. Landscape Plan with PDP2024-001 Park Amenity

7. Elevations and Floor Plans

8. Adopted MMRP

9. Correspondence from Commenting Agencies

10. Site Specific Service Plan

62 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council take action to approve each component of the proposed Project as outlined in the subject title of this item.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Lennar Homes (“Applicant”) is requesting approval for a series of en titlement applications , including a vesting tentative tract map (“TM6375”), planned development permit (“PDP2024 - 001”) and an annexation (“RO310”) , hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Project .” This Project, the associated environmental finding, and prezoning were considered by the Council at its December 16, 2024, meeting. The environmental finding of the mitigated negative declaration that was prepared for the Project was adopted by the Council and the prezoning (Rezone 2024- 005) was approved by the Council with a 5-0 vote at the December 16, 2024, meeting.

Subsequently, following discussion of concerns related to the remaining entitlement applications (TM6375, PDP2024 -001 and RO310), the Council unanimously agreed to continue the remaining applic ations to a date uncertain. The concerns leading to the continuance of the Project are discussed in the body of this report.

BACKGROUND
Following Council’s direction from the December 16, 2024, meeting, staff worked with the developer to address solid waste collection concerns discussed further below in this report.

PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS
Below, please find a brief summary of each component of the proposed Project that were continued. The intent of this report is to provide Council with additional information and clarification on discussion topics that occurred at the December 16, 2024, Council meeting. The complete analysis of the proposed Project can be found in the initial staff report to the City Council dated December 16, 2024, and provided as Attachment 4 to this report.

Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6375
The Project proposes a 385-lot, non-gated planned single-family development on a ±54.60-acre portion of the total ±58.9-acre site. The remainder of the site is planned for a future park and is not included as part of the development. The Project site is designated for Medium Density (4.1 – 7.0 DU/Ac) in the Clovis General Plan and the Project conforms with the existing designation by proposing the maximum density of 7 dwelling units per acre.

Planned Development Permit 2024-001
The applicant has provided a list of development standards as outlined in Attachment 5. These standards are incorporated into the Project’s planned development permit (PDP). Internal amenities within the Project and public/community amenities have been identified in conjunction with the PDP.

Annexation RO310
The proposed annexation boundary is approximately 201 acres and details outlining the City’s capacity to effectively serve the proposed annexation territory are provided in Attachment 10.

63 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Solid Waste Collection Concerns
The Project is organized into three (3) non-gated communities , which include the Core, Treasures and Wilde product types. The southern neighborhood offers the Wilde product line (varying from 2,112 to 2,778 square feet), which features smaller more compact housing options that include several narrow private streets that lead to garages of the single -family homes.

Several of these narrow streets were proposed as 24’ wide , which as determined by Public Utilities, are too narrow for trash trucks to safely conduct trash collection. Therefore, the majority of the residents would be required to haul their toters to adjacent wider streets to be collected.

As a result, the proposed “Bloom Avenue” was designated as a private street with no parking on trash collection days in which parking would be enforced by the Homeowner’s Association (HOA).

The Council voiced concerns regarding the proposed trash toter placement and servicing , expressing the following key concerns:

 Opposition to residents hauling three toters up to three homes away;  Apprehension of the HOA enforcing no parking on trash service days , thus leading to frustration from residents and increased work for Public Utilities; and  Objection to the overall compact lot design and narrow streets.

Ultimately, Councilmembers felt that the concerns warranted redesign of the Project that would allow trash toters to be collected in front of each lot. The applicant has revised the previously proposed narrower 24’ wide streets to a minimum of 32’ wide (see Figure 1 below). The Public Utilities Department has confirmed that 32’ wide streets are sufficient for the safe collection of toters in front of each lot.

Figure 1
64 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

As a result of the street widening , minor modifications to the Project have occurred, including reconfiguration and reduction of the onsite park space amenity (see Attachment 1A). Although the Applicant proposes to reduce the onsite park space , additional active amenities have been added, including a children’s play area with a shade sail, a serpentine walking path and two gathering spaces with seating (Attachment 6). These amenities are in addition to the original amenities which will remain, including a shade structure, picnic tables, BBQ stations, and open grass area.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), staff completed an Initial Study for the Project . A Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Attachment 8) was adopted for the Project by City Council on December 16, 2024. A Notice of Determination was completed for the Project and filed with the County Clerk on December 18, 2024. The NOD can be found on the City’s website at:
https://cityofclovis.com/planning-and-development/planning/ceqa/

No substantial changes, major revisions, or new information of substantial importance have been made to the Project; therefore, no subsequent CEQA review is required.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
As stated in the December 16, 2024, City Council staff report, the Project will provide a diversity in housing types, contribute a quality residential product and further advance growth within the Heritage Grove growth area as envisioned by the General Plan. The Project does not substantially impact sewer, water and other public services and will contribute to their proportionate share of infrastructure and open space. The Project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and Development Code and each component of the Project meets the findings that must be considered when making a decision on a project, as outlined in detail in Attachment 4. Staff therefore recommend that the City Council approve resolutions to approve RO310, TM6375 and PDP2024-001, subject to the conditions of approval provided in Attachments 1B and 2A.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The annexation application will be prepared and submitted to LAFCo after all materials have been submitted by the applicant, sufficient to meet the conditions for the application.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

Prepared by: Liz Salazar, Associate Planner

Reviewed by: City Manager AH
65 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS APPROVING A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR A 385-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION ON APPROXIMATELY 58.9 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF NORTH

MINNEWAWA AVENUE BETWEEN EAST PERRIN AND EAST SHEPHERD AVENUES WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, LLC (“Applicant”), 8080 N. Palm Avenue Suite 110, Fresno, CA 93711, submitted an application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6375 (“TM6375”) for a 385-lot single -family subdivision on approximately 58.9 acres of property (“Project”) located east of North Minnewawa Avenue between East Perrin and East Shepherd Avenues (“Property”); and
WHEREAS, the City published notice of the public hearing in the Fresno Business Journal on January 10, 2025, mailed public notices to property owners within 600 feet of the Property ten (10) days prior to said City Council hearing, and otherwise posted notice of the Public Hearing according to applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered TM6375 on November 21, 2024, at which time the Commission voted and adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve said map; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission’s recommendations were forwarded to the City Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed hearing was held on December 16, 2024, at which time the City Council considered TM6375; and
WHEREAS, on December 16 , 202 4, the City Council continued TM6375 to a date uncertain; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed hearing was held on January 21, 2025, at which time the City Council considered TM6375; and
WHEREAS, based on th e California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) analysis , a mitigated negative declaration and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program was adopted for the Project by City Council on December 16, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the entire Administrative Record relating to this map, which is on file with the City of Clovis Department of Planning and Development Services, and reviewed a nd considered those portions of the Administrative Record determined to be necessary to make an informed decision, including, but not limited to, the staff report, the written materials submitted with the request, and the verbal and written testimony and o ther evidence presented during the public hearing, and the conditions of approval attached as Attachment B to this Resolution, which are incorporated herein by this reference.

66 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AND FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council hereby approves TM6375 as shown in Attachment A, subject to the City’s Council’s approval of as annexation, and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Attachment B to this Resolution.

2. The Project satisfies the required findings for approval of a tentative tract map, as follows:

a. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

b. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development.

c. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

d. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems.

e. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of pro perty within the proposed subdivision. This finding may also be made if the review authority finds that alternate easements for access or use will be provided, and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This f inding shall apply only to easements of record, or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, and no authority is hereby granted to the review authority to determine that the public at large has acquired easements of access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

f. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

g. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities.

h. The proposed subdivision, its design, density, and type of development and improvements conform to the regulations of this D evelopment Code and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law.

3. The City Council adopted the mitigated negative declaration mitigation and monitoring and reporting program for the Project on December 16, 2024.

67 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

4. Without the conditions of approval ( Attachment B of this resolution), the City Council could not make the findings necessary for approval of TM 6375 (attached and labeled Attachment A).

5. The basis for the findings is detailed in the January 21, 2025, staff report, which is hereby incorporated by reference, the entire Administrative Record, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the Public Hearing.

* * * * *

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on January 21, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

68 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

BASIS OF BEARINGS

LEGENDSITE INFORMATIONEXISTING TREESEXISTING BUILDINGSEXISTING LAND USEEXISTING ZONINGPROPOSED ZONINGPLANNED LAND USESOURCE OF WATERSOURCE OF SEWERSOURCE OF GASSOURCE OF TELEPHONE

SOURCE OF ELECTRICITYASSESSOR'S NUMBERSSITE AREASITE ADDRESS VICINITY MAP:PROJECT SITE

NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE
SEE SHEET 5
SEE SHEET 2LEGAL DESCRIPTION

CLOVIS AVENUE
BARON AVENUEPREPARED BY:SUBDIVIDER:OWNER:

NOTES:

PARKING SPACE ANALYSIS (LOTS 1-188):LOT INFO:

SEE SHEET 3SEE SHEET 4
Attachment A
69 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE102,185 S.F.112,185 S.F.122,185 S.F. 192,183 S.F.182,183 S.F.
2,184 S.F.2,184 S.F.
2,184 S.F.2,184 S.F.2,184 S.F.2,184 S.F.
1412,184 S.F.1422,184 S.F.1432,184 S.F.1442,184 S.F.1452,184 S.F. 1532,464 S.F.
1552,184 S.F.1562,184 S.F.1572,184 S.F.1652,184 S.F.1662,184 S.F.1672,184 S.F.1752,184 S.F.1762,184 S.F.1772,184 S.F. 82,614 S.F.72,234 S.F.62,234 S.F.
42,234 S.F.32,234 S.F.52,234 S.F.
22,234 S.F.12,514 S.F.
92,744 S.F.202,744 S.F.
172,183 S.F.
212,744 S.F.332,744 S.F.
1822,184 S.F.1812,184 S.F.1802,184 S.F.1792,744 S.F.1782,744 S.F.1902,328 S.F.1892,223 S.F.1882,195 S.F.1872,167 S.F.1862,140 S.F.1852,112 S.F.1842,356 S.F. 132,185 S.F.162,183 S.F.142,620 S.F.152,620 S.F.
1832,620 S.F.1742,620 S.F.
1712,184 S.F.1702,184 S.F.1722,184 S.F.
1692,744 S.F.1682,744 S.F.
1642,620 S.F.1732,620 S.F.
312,184 S.F.302,184 S.F.292,184 S.F.222,184 S.F.232,184 S.F.242,184 S.F.252,184 S.F. 322,744 S.F.
282,184 S.F.272,620 S.F.262,620 S.F.
432,184 S.F.422,184 S.F.412,184 S.F.342,184 S.F.352,184 S.F.362,184 S.F.372,184 S.F. 442,744 S.F.
402,184 S.F.392,620 S.F.382,620 S.F.
2,630 S.F.
512,184 S.F.522,458 S.F.
452,630 S.F.462,184 S.F.472,184 S.F.482,184 S.F.492,184 S.F.502,184 S.F. 2,458 S.F.
1602,184 S.F.1592,744 S.F.
1622,184 S.F.1612,184 S.F.
1582,744 S.F.
1542,620 S.F.1632,620 S.F.
1472,355 S.F.
1522,184 S.F.1512,184 S.F.1502,184 S.F.1492,184 S.F.1482,184 S.F. 1402,464 S.F.
1462,355 S.F.

OUTLOT A325,534 S.F.

BLOOM AVENUE

VINTAGE AVENUE

HEIRLOOM LANE
OUTLOT A325,534 S.F.

OUTLOT A325,534 S.F.

PROJECT TITLESHEET DESCRIPTIONY&H No.Dr. By:Ch. By:Date:Sheet No.of SheetsPlot By: Adam Lee Plot Date: 1/8/2025 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 2.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COMPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTSERVICES DEPARTMENTProject No.CITY OF CLOVISAPPROVALSREVISIONSAPPROVEDDATEAPPROVED(INITIALS)CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTFEE ADMINISTRATIONDEVELOPMENT REVIEWSTREETSPARKSSOLID WASTEUTILITIESCR26 TRACT NO. 6375MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERDMULTI-FAMILYBB8/8/202321-156 SEE SHEET 4
SEE SHEET 3
LEGEND
70 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
552,184 S.F.542,184 S.F.
592,184 S.F.582,184 S.F.572,184 S.F.562,184 S.F.
622,184 S.F.632,184 S.F.642,184 S.F.762,184 S.F.742,184 S.F.752,184 S.F. 1412,184 S.F.1422,184 S.F.1432,184 S.F.1442,184 S.F.1452,184 S.F. 1532,464 S.F.
812,184 S.F.652,184 S.F.772,184 S.F.
602,630 S.F.
512,184 S.F.522,458 S.F.
452,630 S.F.462,184 S.F.472,184 S.F.482,184 S.F.492,184 S.F.502,184 S.F. 532,458 S.F.
1472,355 S.F.
1522,184 S.F.1512,184 S.F.1502,184 S.F.1492,184 S.F.1482,184 S.F. 1402,464 S.F.
1462,355 S.F.1332,184 S.F.1322,184 S.F.1312,184 S.F.1382,184 S.F.1372,184 S.F.1362,184 S.F.1352,744 S.F.1342,744 S.F. 1392,620 S.F.1302,620 S.F.1112,184 S.F.1122,184 S.F.1132,184 S.F.1182,184 S.F.1172,184 S.F.1162,184 S.F.1152,744 S.F.1142,744 S.F. 1192,620 S.F.1102,620 S.F.1082,203 S.F.1072,203 S.F.1062,203 S.F.1052,203 S.F. 1092,927 S.F.OUTLOT B10,141 S.F.1222,184 S.F.1232,184 S.F.1212,184 S.F.1272,184 S.F.1262,184 S.F.1252,744 S.F. 1282,184 S.F.
1242,744 S.F.
1202,620 S.F.1292,620 S.F.
952,184 S.F.942,184 S.F.932,184 S.F.
852,744 S.F.862,184 S.F.872,184 S.F.882,184 S.F.892,184 S.F. 962,744 S.F.
922,184 S.F.902,620 S.F.912,620 S.F.
1002,203 S.F.992,203 S.F.982,203 S.F.
1012,203 S.F.822,184 S.F.832,184 S.F.732,744 S.F.842,744 S.F. 802,184 S.F.782,620 S.F.792,620 S.F.
712,184 S.F.702,184 S.F.692,184 S.F.
722,744 S.F.612,744 S.F.
682,184 S.F.672,620 S.F.662,620 S.F.
1022,203 S.F.
972,654 S.F.
1032,782 S.F.
1042,768 S.F.

OUTLOT C33,713 S.F.HEIRLOOM LANE

BLOOM AVENUE

VINTAGE LANE

NORTH DEWITT AVENUE
OUTLOT A325,534 S.F.

OUTLOT A325,534 S.F.

SUMMERSET AVENUENORTH DEWITT AVENUE

NORTH PERRY AVENUE

NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE

SUMMERSET AVENUENORTH OXFORD AVENUEWINDMILLAVENUE

NORTH HARVARD AVENUE

NORTH DARTMOUTH AVENUEWINDMILLAVENUE

NORTH CHERRY LANE
222123 552,184 S.F.542,184 S.F.562,184 S.F.
1974,230 S.F.1984,230 S.F.1914,719 S.F.1994,230 S.F.1924,230 S.F.2004,230 S.F.1934,230 S.F.2014,230 S.F.1944,230 S.F.2024,230 S.F.1954,230 S.F.2034,230 S.F.1964,230 S.F. 2184,500 S.F.2174,500 S.F.2164,500 S.F.2154,500 S.F.2144,500 S.F.2134,500 S.F.2124,500 S.F. 2194,893 S.F.
2119,292 S.F.
2224,500 S.F.2234,500 S.F.2244,500 S.F.2254,500 S.F.2264,500 S.F. 2204,899 S.F.2214,500 S.F.
2094,232 S.F.21010,199 S.F.2064,230 S.F.2074,230 S.F.2084,230 S.F.2314,700 S.F.2324,699 S.F.2334,230 S.F.2344,230 S.F.2354,230 S.F.2364,230 S.F.2374,700 S.F. 2784,230 S.F.2774,230 S.F.2764,230 S.F.2754,230 S.F.2744,230 S.F.2794,595 S.F. 2944,500 S.F.2934,500 S.F.2924,500 S.F.2914,500 S.F.2904,500 S.F.2894,500 S.F.2885,277 S.F. 2954,894 S.F.3104,500 S.F.2974,500 S.F.3094,500 S.F.2984,500 S.F.3084,500 S.F.2994,500 S.F.3074,500 S.F.3004,500 S.F.3064,500 S.F.3014,500 S.F.3054,500 S.F.3024,500 S.F.3045,278 S.F.3035,278 S.F. 3194,230 S.F.3209,979 S.F.
3254,500 S.F.3264,500 S.F.3274,500 S.F.3284,500 S.F.
3219,858 S.F.3224,500 S.F.3234,500 S.F.3244,500 S.F.
3295,493 S.F.
3514,500 S.F.3504,500 S.F.3494,500 S.F.3484,500 S.F.3474,500 S.F. 3534,500 S.F.3524,500 S.F.
3465,447 S.F.
3549,867 S.F.3594,700 S.F.3584,700 S.F.3574,700 S.F.3564,700 S.F.35510,067 S.F.3609,979 S.F. 3654,500 S.F.3664,500 S.F.3674,500 S.F.3684,500 S.F.
3619,876 S.F.3624,500 S.F.3634,498 S.F.3644,500 S.F.
3695,458 S.F.
3364,500 S.F.3394,500 S.F.3354,500 S.F.3404,500 S.F.3344,500 S.F.3414,500 S.F.3334,500 S.F.3424,500 S.F.3324,500 S.F.3434,500 S.F.3314,500 S.F.3444,500 S.F.3305,281 S.F.3455,282 S.F. 3384,892 S.F.3374,893 S.F.3764,500 S.F.3754,500 S.F.3744,500 S.F.3734,500 S.F.3724,500 S.F.3714,500 S.F. 3814,500 S.F.3834,500 S.F.
3794,500 S.F.3804,500 S.F.3775,285 S.F.3785,284 S.F.
3854,893 S.F.3704,892 S.F.3844,500 S.F.3824,500 S.F.
42,234 S.F.32,234 S.F.22,234 S.F.12,514 S.F.
132,185 S.F.162,183 S.F.142,620 S.F.152,620 S.F.652,184 S.F.772,184 S.F. 2304,232 S.F.
2274,500 S.F.
22910,368 S.F.2289,261 S.F.2044,230 S.F.2054,230 S.F.
252,184 S.F.282,184 S.F.272,620 S.F.262,620 S.F.372,184 S.F.402,184 S.F.392,620 S.F.382,620 S.F.512,184 S.F.522,458 S.F. 492,184 S.F.502,184 S.F.532,458 S.F.
892,184 S.F.922,184 S.F.902,620 S.F.912,620 S.F.99982,203 S.F.802,184 S.F.782,620 S.F.792,620 S.F.682,184 S.F.672,620 S.F.662,620 S.F.972,654 S.F. OUTLOT A325,534 S.F.3184,224 S.F.3174,230 S.F.3164,230 S.F.3154,230 S.F.3144,230 S.F.3134,230 S.F.3124,230 S.F.OUTLOT C33,713 S.F. 3114,894 S.F.2964,894 S.F.

SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3HEIRLOOM LANEHEIRLOOM LANE
SEE SHEET 5
PROJECT TITLESHEET DESCRIPTIONY&H No.Dr. By:Ch. By:Date:Sheet No.of SheetsPlot By: Adam Lee Plot Date: 1/8/2025 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 4.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COMPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTSERVICES DEPARTMENTProject No.CITY OF CLOVISAPPROVALSREVISIONSAPPROVEDDATEAPPROVED(INITIALS)CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTFEE ADMINISTRATIONDEVELOPMENT REVIEWSTREETSPARKSSOLID WASTEUTILITIESCR46 TRACT NO. 6375MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERDRESIDENTIALBB8/8/202321-156 LEGEND
72 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

SUMMERSET AVENUENORTH DEWITT AVENUE

NORTH WALKER AVENUE

NORTH PERRY AVENUEWINDMILLAVENUE

NORTH RALPH AVENUECLOVIS AVENUE
WINDMILLAVENUE2221201918171615141312111098 23
REMAINDER5,031 S.F.
2224,500 S.F.2234,500 S.F.2244,500 S.F.2254,500 S.F.2264,500 S.F. 2204,899 S.F.2214,500 S.F.
2314,700 S.F.2324,699 S.F.2334,230 S.F.2344,230 S.F.2354,230 S.F.2364,230 S.F.2374,700 S.F. 2516,091 S.F.2424,500 S.F.
2465,495 S.F.2475,492 S.F.2454,500 S.F.2484,500 S.F.2444,500 S.F.2494,500 S.F.2434,500 S.F.2504,566 S.F. 2404,500 S.F.2529,448 S.F.2395,954 S.F.2414,500 S.F.2537,501 S.F.2554,500 S.F.2565,483 S.F.2577,728 S.F.25812,851 S.F.2544,500 S.F. 2674,230 S.F.2784,230 S.F.2774,230 S.F.2764,230 S.F.2754,230 S.F.2744,230 S.F.2734,230 S.F.2724,230 S.F.2714,230 S.F.2704,230 S.F.2694,230 S.F.2684,230 S.F.2614,230 S.F.2664,230 S.F.2654,230 S.F.2644,230 S.F.2634,230 S.F.2624,230 S.F. 2794,595 S.F.2605,592 S.F. 2944,500 S.F.2934,500 S.F.2924,500 S.F.2914,500 S.F.2904,500 S.F.2894,500 S.F.2885,277 S.F. 2954,894 S.F.
2864,500 S.F.
2804,893 S.F.2814,500 S.F.2824,500 S.F.2834,500 S.F.2844,500 S.F.2854,500 S.F.2875,277 S.F. 3104,500 S.F.2974,500 S.F.3094,500 S.F.2984,500 S.F.3084,500 S.F.2994,500 S.F.3074,500 S.F.3004,500 S.F.3064,500 S.F.3014,500 S.F.3054,500 S.F.3024,500 S.F.3045,278 S.F.3035,278 S.F. 2304,232 S.F.
2274,500 S.F.
22910,368 S.F.2289,261 S.F.
38622,512 S.F.
2387,696 S.F.
25917,353 S.F.

OUTLOT E984 S.F.

OUTLOT DOUTLOT F53,420 S.F.
922,184 S.F.912,620 S.F.99982,203 S.F.
387195,206 S.F.
972,654 S.F.OUTLOT C33,713 S.F.
3114,894 S.F.2964,894 S.F.

BARON AVENUECLOVISAVENUE

NORTH DEWITT AVENUE
PROJECT TITLESHEET DESCRIPTIONY&H No.Dr. By:Ch. By:Date:Sheet No.of SheetsPlot By: Jared Jones Plot Date: 1/8/2025 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 5.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COMPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTSERVICES DEPARTMENTProject No.CITY OF CLOVISAPPROVALSREVISIONSAPPROVEDDATEAPPROVED(INITIALS)CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTFEE ADMINISTRATIONDEVELOPMENT REVIEWSTREETSPARKSSOLID WASTEUTILITIESCR56 TRACT NO. 6375MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERDRESIDENTIALBB8/8/202321-156 SEE SHEET 4
SEE SHEET 3
73 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

PROJECT TITLESHEET DESCRIPTIONY&H No.Dr. By:Ch. By:Date:Sheet No.of SheetsPlot By: Adam Lee Plot Date: 1/2/2025 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 6.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COMPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTSERVICES DEPARTMENTProject No.CITY OF CLOVISAPPROVALSREVISIONSAPPROVEDDATEAPPROVED(INITIALS)CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTFEE ADMINISTRATIONDEVELOPMENT REVIEWSTREETSPARKSSOLID WASTEUTILITIESCR66 TRACT NO. 6375MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERDCROSS SECTIONSBB8/8/202321-156

NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE DETAIL
32' ALLEY DETAILF AANORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE DETAILA
50' LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREET D37.2' ALLEY DETAILE
50' LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREET C 56' LOCAL STREET DETAILB 73' LOCAL STREET DETAILG
68' LOCAL STREET DETAILGGNORTH DEWITT AVENUEHNORTH CLOVIS AVENUEI 74 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Attachment B
Conditions of Approval – TM6375
(Text modifications are in Bold & Underline)
(Text deletions are in Strikethrough)

Planning Division Comments
(Liz Salazar, Assistant Planner – 559-324-2305)

1. The developer shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Project, included as Attachment 8 to the staff report.

2. TM6375 is approved per Attachment A.

3. This Project is subject to the development standards of the Heritage Grove Master Plan.

4. Prezone 2024-005 approves an R-1-PRD (Planned Residential Development) Zone District for the Project site. Density shall be consistent with the Medium Density Land Use Designation of the Clovis General Plan.

5. The proposed project shall produce a comprehensive development of superior quality than which might otherwise occur from more traditional development on the site which will be reviewed and approved through the civil plan review process and residential site plan review (RSPR).

6. The developer shall enter into a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) covenant regarding the maintenance of open space, common areas, and private drive aisles. Such agreements shall be disclosed to all future home buyers. The HOA shall be formed and functioning prior to tract acceptance.

7. The developer shall obtain City approval in advance of temporary and permanent subdivision signs through separate sign review, consistent with the development criteria of the Development Code Sign Ordinance.

8. No more than two of the same unit type (floor layout and exterior materials package) shall be repeated side by side. When two of the same units are repeated side by side, they shall be different colors. These identical provisions may be waived by the City Planner on a specific lot basis within the project when the size or configuration of a lot would otherwise prevent compliance with the above requirements of any other siting or setback/yard requirements established under this application. If such a waiver is requested, the developer and City Planner shall work together to ensure that any sitings of units not in compliance with the above requirements shall be of different materials and elevations in order to minimize any adverse visual impacts that may result.

75 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

9. TM6375 is subject to the development standards of Planned Development Permit (PDP) 2024-001 and any amendments thereafter . Any development standards not expressed within PDP2024-001 and TM6375 shall be subject to the underlying Zone District R-1-PRD Standards and Guidelines, and the Development Code.

10. A RSPR is required to memorialize building plans and elevations for the different product types of TM6375. Specific color and materials of the models, walls, amenities, landscaping, and fencing will be evaluated through the civil plans.

11. Setbacks shall be measured to the exterior face of the framing of the structure. Exceptions to the setbacks are identified in section 9.24.100, of the Development Code.

12. Development standards for the lots of TM6375 shall be as follows:

Standard
Housing Products
Wilde
(188 190
units)
Treasures
(90 92 units)
Core
(107 103
units)
Minimum Lot Size (Square Feet) 2,112 4,230 4,230
Minimum Parcel Width 39’ 45’ 45’
Minimum Corner Parcel Width N/A 50’ 50’
Minimum Reverse Parcel Width N/A 55’ 55’
Minimum Parcel Depth 53’ 94’ 94’
Maximum Lot Coverage 62% 52% 45%
Maximum Height 26’ 7” 18’ 11” 25’ 3”
Front (Garage side) Setback 4’ 20’ 20’
Front (Living side) Setback 10’ 12’ 12’
Interior Side Setback
0’ non-patio
side 7’ patio
side
5’
5’
Street Side Setbacks 3’ 10’ 10’
Rear Setback 10’ 10’ 20’
Garages
20’x20’ interior
dimension (2-
car)

20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)
20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)

13. North Minnewawa Avenue is designated as a thematic street and shall have an 18-foot parkway, with a 9-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the right-of-way, 5-foot walk, and 4-foot landscape buffer setback.

14. Clovis Avenue is designated as a community boulevard and shall have an 20-foot parkway, with a 10-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the right -of-way, 6-foot walk, and 4 -foot landscape buffer setback.

76 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

15. The developer shall construct a minimum six-foot high solid split face masonry wall along the limits of TM6375 adjacent to N. Minnewawa and Clovis Avenue.

16. Each lot with a zero (0) foot interior setback shall enter into a recordable covenant that provides access to each abutting property for repair and maintenance and other provisions as deemed necessary by the Planning and Development Services Director.

17. To ensure consistency with the conditions of approval for TM6375, the developer shall provide, for the Planning Department’s review and approval, a copy of the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions prior to start of construction of homes on any lots.

18. The developer shall utilize street lights along local and private streets within the development area that are of the same design and luminosity as surrounding developments within Heritage Grove.

19. The developer shall contribute a proportionate share towards the acquisition and development of future parks in order for the City to maintain its adopted ratio of providing four (4) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, as stated in Policy 1.1 in the Open Space and Conservation Element of the 2014 General Plan . The proportionate fair share will be accessed by the Engineering Division.

20. All lighting shall be screened from direct view from the public right -of-way and adjacent residential properties.

21. All landscaping (open space and private yards) shall conform to the City of Clovis Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

22. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved separately by the landscape review committee with the civil set for tree and landscape type and location.

23. Lots 1-188 190 shall provide an all-weather surface and path for the placement and storage of trash toters. The paved path shall lead from the street to the fenced noncovered patio areas within the 7 -foot side yard to the street. The fenced noncovered patio area shall provide gate access.

24. Placement of trash toters for service pick-up shall be approved by the Engineering Division.

The developer shall restrict parking on trash service days along private streets as necessary in order to accommodate service for lots 1-188. If deemed necessary “Bloom Avenue” may be required as a private street to maintain “no parking” on trash service days. A minimum of 188 guest parking shall be maintained within the Wilde Series.

25. Landscape features and forms within amenity areas shall be consistent with Heritage Grove Design Guidelines. Details shall be provided in the construction plan.

26. Three (3) pocket parks totaling approximately 56,400 square feet with associated amenities shall be constructed as the private amenity. Two (2) pocket parks totaling approximately 77 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

43,850 square feet with the following amenities: shade structure, patio tables, BBQ stations, children’s playground equipment with a shade sail, serpentine walking paths with two seating areas, and open grass space shall be constructed as the private amenity.

27. As a public amenity for the Project, the developer shall contribute the dollar amount totaling $95,450 to the City for utilization in existing or future open space and/or park improvements.

28. The developer shall record a Covenant regarding a “right to farm,” for adjacent property owners. Such agreement shall be disclosed to all future home buyers.

29. The applicant shall record a Notice of Nonconformance dealing with any structure used for model homes where the garage is converted for the use as a sales office.

30. Upon final recordation of this vesting tentative tract map, it shall be the applicant’s responsibility to furnish to the Planning Department an electronic (PDF) copy of the original map obtained from the Fresno County Recorder’s Office.

31. The applicant shall relay all conditions of approval for TM6375 to all subsequent purchasers of individual lots, if applicable, and/or to subsequent purchasers of this entire tract map development.

32. Prior to the final map acceptance, the developer shall incorporate an 8-foot wide pedestrian easement along the eastern property line, adjacent to the future City water storage tank(s) site.

Fire Department Conditions
(Rick Fultz, Fire Department Representative – 559-324-2224)

Roads/ Access

33. Two Points of Access: Any development to this parcel will require a minimum of two (2) points of access to be reviewed and approved by the Clovis Fire Department. All required access drives shall remain accessible during all phases of construction which includes paving, concrete work, underground work, landscaping, perimeter walls. Developments of one- or two -family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads.

34. Street Width for Single Family Residences: Minimum Access Road Width of 36 feet for Single Family Residences. Roads 36 feet or wider allow for Parking on both sides of street.

35. Exception Streets with houses on only one side of the street: Roads 32 feet or greater, to less than 36 feet in width require Fire Lane Markings on one side of the street. Parking is allowed on one side of street.

78 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

36. Street Width: Fire apparatus access width shall be determined by measuring from “base of curb” to “base of curb” for roadways that have curbs. When roadways do not have curbs, the measurements shall be from the edge of the roadway surface (approved all weather surface).

37. Turning Radius: All access way roads constructed shall be designed with a minimum outside turning radius of forty-five feet (45’).

38. Temporary Street Signs: The applicant shall install temporary street signs that meet City Temporary Street Sign Standard #1.9 prior to issuance of building permits within a subdivision.

39. All Weather Access &Water Supply: The applicant shall provide all weather access to the site during all phases of construction to the satisfaction of the approved Clovis Fire Department Standard #1.2 or #1.3.

40. Private Street Names: Private street names shall be consistent with public street names to the north and south or to the east and west alignments as approved by the Fire Department.

41. Fire Access – Landscape Obstruction: Landscaping trees or shrubs located adjacent to the fire access drives shall be of the type that will not impede fire access due to their growth process.

Fire Hydrants

42. Residential Fire Hydrant: 4 ½” x 2 ½” approved Residential Type fire hydrant(s) and “Blue Dot” hydrant locators, paint fire hydrant(s) yellow with blue top and caps, and paint the curb red shall be installed as specified by the adopted Clovis Fire Department Standard #1.4. Plans shall be submitted to the Clovis Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. The hydrants shall be charged and in operation prior to any framing or combustible material being brought onto the site. Hydrants curb markings and blue dots to be completed prior to occupancy of any homes.

43. Looped Water Main: The applicant shall install approved looped water main capable of the necessary flow of water for adequate fire protection and approved by the Clovis Fire Department

Engineering / Utilities / Solid Waste Division Conditions (Sean Smith, Engineering Division Representative – 559-324-2363) (Paul Armendariz, Department Representative – 559-324-2649)

Maps and Plans

44. The applicant shall have a final tract map prepared, in the form prescribed by the Subdivision Map Act and City of Clovis Municipal Code. The final tract map shall be 79 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

submitted to the City of Clovis Engineering Division, and should include, but not be limited to, final tract map, the current filing fee, closure calculations, current preliminary title report, legal descriptions and drawings of required dedications.

45. The applicant shall submit separately to the City of Clovis Engineering Division, a set of construction plans on 24" x 36" sheets with City standard title block for all required improvements and a current preliminary title report. These plans shall be pre pared by a registered civil engineer, and shall include a grading plan, landscape plan, a site plan showing trash enclosure locations and an overall site utility plan showing locations and sizes of sewer, water, storm drain, and irrigation mains, laterals, manholes, meters, valves, hydrants, fire sprinkler services, other facilities, etc. Plan check and inspection fees per City of Clovis Resolution No. 23-34 shall be paid with the first submittal of said plans. All plans shall be submitted at or before the time the building plans are submitted to the Building Division and shall be approved by the City and all other involved agencies prior to the release of any development permits.

46. Prior to the initial submittal of the improvement plans, the applicant shall contact Sean Smith at (559) 324-2363 to setup a coordination meeting (Pre-submittal Meeting).

47. Upon approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall provide the City with the appropriate number of copies. After all improvements have been constructed and accepted by the City, the applicant shall submit to the City of Clovis Engineering Division (1) digital copy to the City in PDF format of the approved set of construction plans revised to accurately reflect all field conditions and revisions and marked "AS -BUILT" for review and approval. Upon approval of the AS -BUILTs by the City , and p rior to granting of final occupancy or final acceptance, the applicant shall provide to the City (1) digital copy in PDF format and two (2) bond copies.

48. The applicant shall comply with reporting requirements in accordance with Government Code 65940.1, which requires the City to, “request from a development proponent, upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the final inspection, whichever occurs last, the total amount of fees and exactions associated with the project for which the certificate was issued. The City shall post this information on its internet website, and update it at least twice per year.”

General Provisions

49. The applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of payment and prior to final map approval by Council or have the fees payable directly to the City through a separate escrow account at the time of recordation of the map.

50. The applicant is advised that, pursuant to California Government Code, Section 66020, any party may protest the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions imposed on a development project by a local agency. Protests shall be filed in accordance with the provisions of the California Government Code and shall be filed within 90 days after conditional approval of this application is granted. The 90 day protest period for this project 80 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

shall begin on the “date of approval” as indicated on the “Acknowledgment of Acceptance of Conditions” form.

51. All reimbursement requests shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the requirements of the current version of the “Developer Reimbursement Procedures” a copy of which may be obtained at the City Engineer’s Office.

52. The applicant shall install all improvements within public right -of-way and easements in accordance with the City of Clovis standards, specifications, master plans, and record drawings in effect at the time of improvement plan approval.

53. The applicant shall address all conditions, and be responsible for obtaining encroachment permits from the City of Clovis for all work performed within the City's right -of-way and easements.

54. The applicant shall submit a soils report or a waiver of soils report to the City of Clovis Engineering Division for approval by the City Engineer.

55. The applicant shall provide and pay for all geotechnical services per City policy.

56. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the local utility, telephone, and cable companies. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to notify the local utility, telephone, and cable companies for the removal or relocation of utility poles where necessary. The City shall not accept first submittals without proof that the applicant has provided the improvement plans and documents showing all proposed work to the utility, telephone, and cable companies. All utility vaults in which lids cannot be sloped to match proposed finished grading, local utilities have 5% max slope, shall be located in sidewalk areas with pedestrian lids so the lid slope matches sidewalk cross slope.

57. All existing overhead and new utility facilities located on -site, within alleys, or within the street right-of-way along the streets adjacent to this tract shall be undergrounded unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

58. The applicant shall contact and address all requirements of the United States Postal Service Clovis Office for the location and type of mailboxes to be installed. The location of the facilities shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of improvement plans or any construction.

59. The applicant shall contact and address Caltrans requirements, and be responsible for obtaining encroachment permits from Caltrans for all work performed within the State right- of-way. The applicant shall be required to mitigate impacts to State Highway facilities as determined by the City Engineer.

Dedications and Street Improvements

81 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

60. The applicant shall provide right -of-way acquisition or dedicate free and clear of all encumbrances and/or improve the following streets to City standards. The street improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s specific plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the type, location, and grades of existing improvements.

a. North Minnewawa Avenue – dedicate to provide right-of-way acquisition for 42.5' (exist varies) east of centerline and 24.5’ (existing 20’) west of centerline, and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb return ramps, street lights, fiber optic conduit, landscape strip, 43' (20.5’ west + 22.5’ east) permanent paving, permanent paving and overlay as necessary to match the existing permanent pavement, 3' paved swale, and transitional paving as needed.

b. North Clovis Avenue – dedicate to provide right-of-way acquisition for 106' (exist 0'), and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, curb return ramps, street lights, fiber optic conduit, median island, median island landscaping and irrigatio n, landscape strip, 56' (28’ west + 28 east’) permanent paving, permanent paving and overlay as necessary to match the existing permanent pavement, 3' paved swale, and transitional paving as needed.

c. Interior Streets – Dedicate to provide for 50’ or 54’ of right -of-way in conformance with the City policy on street widths, and improve with curb, gutter, 5’ sidewalk adjacent to the curb, drive approaches, curb return ramps, streetlights, permanent paving , and all transitional paving as needed.

d. Cul-De-Sacs - dedicate to provide for 52' radius and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, 43' permanent paving and all transitional paving as needed.

e. Install a traffic signal at North Baron and North Clovis Avenues and provide the necessary right-of-way for the signal in its ultimate location.

f. The applicant shall relinquish all access to Clovis and Minnewawa Avenues.

g. Median island turn pockets require the approval of the City Engineer.

61. The applicant shall provide a dedication for a 10' public utility easement, where applicable, along all public frontages. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining approval by the utilities companies where alternate widths are provided. The applicant shall provide to the City copies of all final easements prior to final map acceptance.

62. For new onsite ADA paths of travel that connect to the City sidewalk, the applicant shall replace enough sidewalk to provide a compliant landing with appropriate transitions to existing sidewalk grades.

82 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

63. The applicant shall remove and repair all damaged or broken concrete improvements. The City Engineer may require the repair of additional improvements if they are damaged prior to occupancy.

64. The applicant shall not install any fences, temporary or permanent in public right-of-way.

65. The applicant shall provide preliminary title report, legal description and drawings for all dedications required which are not on the site. All contact with owners, appraisers, etc. of the adjacent properties where dedication is needed shall be made only by the City. The City will prepare an estimate of acquisition costs including but not limited to appraised value, appraisal costs, negotiation costs, and administrative costs. The applicant shall pay such estimated costs as soon as they are determined by the City.

66. The sideyard side of all corner lots shall have full width sidewalk except where planter strips or meandering sidewalk is proposed.

67. The applicant shall obtain "R Value" tests in quantity sufficient to represent all street areas, and have street structural sections designed by a registered civil engineer based on these "R Value" tests.

68. The applicant shall, at the ends of any permanent pavement abutting undeveloped property, install 2" x 6" redwood header boards that shall be placed prior to the street surfacing.

69. Standard barricades with reflectors shall be installed at ends of streets abutting undeveloped property and any other locations to be specified by the City Engineer.

Sewer

70. The applicant shall identify and abandon all septic systems to City standards.

71. The applicant shall install sanitary sewer mains of the size and in the locations indicated below, prior to occupancy. The sewer improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and shall be supported by appropriate calculations. The improvements indicated below will provide temporary service until the improvements are installed that provide permanent service.

a. North Minnewawa Avenue – install 12" main along frontage.

b. North Clovis Avenue – install 10" main along frontage.

c. Interior Streets – install 8" mains.

72. The applicant shall install one ( 1) 4" sewer service house branch to each lot within the tentative tract.
83 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

73. All existing sewer services that will not be used with this development shall be abandoned by cutting and capping the service at the right-of-way line.

74. The applicant shall notify all property owners annexed to the City and along streets where a new sewer main will be constructed to determine if they wish to be connected to City sewer. Property owners shall work directly with the applicant regarding costs and location.

The applicant shall notify property owners that sewer connection fees are required if they choose to connect.

75. The City cannot guarantee at this time that sewer capacity will be available for this development when site construction occurs. The applicant, therefore, waives any claim or demand against the City for any delay in availability of sewer capacity for this subdivision.

76. Applicant acknowledges that sewage collection and treatment capacity for the area within which the proposed subdivision is located is extremely limited, and that capacity may not be available to provide service for the proposed subdivision at such time as applicant is ready to seek approval of a final map. Applicant acknowledges, understands, and agrees that if such sewage collection and treatment capacity is not available to serve the proposed subdivision, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis, the final map may not be approved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, applicant has freely and voluntarily chosen to proceed with the submittal and processing of the tentative map, intends to expend money, time and effort in connection therewith, and accepts the risks that the final map approval may be delayed until sufficient capacity is available as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis. Applicant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Clovis from an y and all claims, costs, expenses, and damages incurred or suffered by applicant, its principals, officers, employees, agents, or contractors, caused by, in connection with, or arising out of the unavailability of sewage collection or treatment capacity to serve the proposed subdivision, or the City’s refusal or failure to approve a final map for the proposed subdivision because of the unavailability of sewage collection or treatment.

a. Permanent service to the Project requires the improvements indicated below in accordance with the Sewer Master Plan. The City Engineer shall determine the timing of the improvements in the event they are installed by a City CIP project or development.

b. CIP Project 6-B (DeWolf Trunk Sewer System).

c. CIP Project 6-A (Shepherd / Willow Pump Station and Force Main System).

d. CIP Project AA (Phase 2 STWRF Expansion).

Water

77. The applicant shall identify and abandon all water wells to City standards. 84 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

78. The applicant shall install water mains of the sizes and in the locations indicated below, and provide an adequately looped water system prior to occupancy. The water improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements.

The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and shall be supported by appropriate calculations.

a. North Minnewawa Avenue – install 12" main along frontage.

b. North Clovis Avenue – install 12" main along frontage.

c. Interior Streets – install 8" mains.

d. Install facilities to provide separation between Pressure Zone 2 east of North Minnewawa Avenue and Pressure Zone 1 west of North Minnewawa Avenue.

79. The applicant shall install a City standard water service to each lot of the proposed subdivision. Water services shall be grouped at property lines to accommodate automatic meter reading system, including installation of connecting conduit. The water me ter shall be placed in the sidewalk and not in planters or driveways.

80. All existing water services that will not be used with this development shall be abandoned by closing the service’s corporation stop and creating a physical separation between the corporation stop and the service.

81. The applicant shall notify all property owners’ annexed to the City and along streets where a new water main will be constructed to determine if they wish to be connected to City water.

Property owners shall work directly with the applicant regarding costs and location. The applicant shall notify property owners that water connection fees are required if they choose to connect.

82. Prior to recording a final map of any phase, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Fire Chief and City Engineer that there is adequate water pressure to serve the units to be constructed. The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to determine the adequacy of water supply/pressure for the proposed development.

83. Applicant acknowledges that water distribution and treatment capacity for the area within which the proposed subdivision is located is extremely limited, and that distribution may not be available to provide service for the proposed subdivision at such tim e as applicant is ready to seek approval of a final map. Applicant acknowledges, understands, and agrees that if such water distribution and treatment capacity is not available to serve the proposed subdivision, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis, the final map may not be approved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, applicant has freely and voluntarily chosen to proceed with the submittal and processing of the tentative map, intends to expend money, time and effort in connection therewith, and accepts the risks that 85 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

the final map approval may be delayed until sufficient distribution is available as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis. Applicant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Clovis from any and all claims, costs, ex penses, and damages incurred or suffered by applicant, its principals, officers, employees, agents, or contractors, caused by, in connection with, or arising out of the unavailability of water distribution or treatment capacity to serve the proposed subdiv ision, or the City’s refusal or failure to approve a final map for the proposed subdivision because of the unavailability of water distribution or treatment capacity.
a. The Project requires the improvements indicated below in accordance with the Water Master Plan. The City Engineer shall determine the timing of the improvements in the event they are installed by a City CIP project or development.
b. P-3 (16” Water Main)
c. P-4 (12” Water Main)
d. T-6 (3.5 MG Tank)
e. T-9 (7 MG Tank)

Recycled Water

84. The applicant shall install recycled water mains of the sizes and in the locations indicated below. The recycled water improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. All areas utilizing recycle water for irrigation shall be clearly marked on the improvement plans. The applicant ’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and may require appropriate calculations.

a. North Minnewawa Avenue – install 8" main along frontage.

b. North Clovis Avenue – install 16” main along the property.

c. Paseos, Trails, and Neighborhood Parks – install mains as necessary to serve the paseos, trails, and the neighborhood parks.

Grading and Drainage

85. The applicant shall contact the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) and address all requirements, pay all applicable fees required, obtain any required NPDES permit, and implement Best Available Technology Economically Achievable and Best Conventional Po llutant Control Technology to reduce or eliminate storm water pollution.

Plans for these requirements shall be included in the previously required set of construction plans, and shall be submitted to and approved by FMFCD prior to the release of any development permits.

86. Portions of the project appear to lie within a flood zone. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Municipal Code.
86 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

87. In the event permanent storm drainage facilities are not available, the applicant shall provide temporary on-site retention basins for storm water disposal and provide a cash deposit for each basin to offset the City’s cost of maintaining the basins. The size and design shall be in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer and may change based on design calculations and access requirements for maintenance. The temporary pond maintenance deposit shall be based on size, depth, expected maintenance schedule, etc. However, the property owner shall be responsible for periodic cleaning of toxic material. The temporary basin is solely for the convenience of the subdivision.

88. The owner of the property on which the temporary basin(s) are located shall backfilled said basin(s) within ninety (90) days after notice is given by the City that the basin(s) are no longer needed. In the event the owner fails to backfill said basin(s) within said 90 days, the City may cause the basin to be backfilled. A lien to cover the cost of the work will be placed on the property, including the costs to prepare and enforce the lien. A covenant shall be prepared and recorded on the lot on which the basin(s) is/are located.

89. Grade differentials between lots and adjacent properties shall be adequately shown on the grading plan and shall be treated in a manner in conformance with City of Clovis Standard Drawing No. M-4 as modified by the City Council. Any retaining walls required on-site or in public right of way shall be masonry construction. All retaining walls shall be designed by a registered civil engineer.

Irrigation and Landscaping Facilities

90. The applicant, as a portion of the required tract improvements, shall provide landscaping and irrigation as required herein. The landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in public right-of-way and the area reserved for landscaping. The irrigation and landscape improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Plans for the required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be prepared by an appropriately registered professional at the applicant's expense and shall be approved by the City of Clovis Planning and Development Services Department and Public Utilities Department prior to the beginning of construction or the recording of the final tract map, whichever occurs first. Landscape and irrig ation facilities that the City Landscape Maintenance District shall maintain: the mini-park, paseos, paseo lights, interior street lights, entry feat ures, landscape strips along North Minnewawa and North Clovis Avenues, and the median islands in North Clovis Avenue. The landscape strip around the planned unit development may be maintained by a perpetual maintenance covenant.

91. The owner shall request annexation to and provide a covenant for the Landscape Maintenance District. The property owner acknowledges and agrees that such request serves as a petition pursuant to California State Proposition 218 and no further election shall be required for the establishment of the initial assessment. The assessment for each lot shall be obtained from the City for the tax year following the recordation of the final map. 87 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

The estimated annual assessment per average sized lot is $ 540.26, which is subject to change prior to issuance of building permit or final tract map approval and is subject to an annual change in the range of the assessment in the amount of the Consumer Price Index, U.S. City Average, All Urban Consumers (CPI Index), plus two percent (2%). The additional landscaping enhancements that exceed the City norms and are specific benefit to the property, such as the entry feature, columns, monuments, interior median islands, round-a- bouts, special street lights, etc, if determined to be maintained by the Landscape Maintenance District, shall be maintained by an additional landscape maintenance assessment. The applicant shall provide construction costs and deposit with the City an amount equal to 50% of the value of the enhanced landscaping hardscape features, or an alternate amount approved by the City Engineer, such as columns, monuments, and special street lights, tha t exceeds the City norms. The applicant shall provide the City with an estimate of the annual maintenance for the special lighting and landscaping enhancements that exceeds the City norms. The owner/developer shall notify all potential lot buyers before they actually purchase a lot that this tract is a part of a Landscape Maintenance District and shall inform potential buyers of the assessment amount. Said notification shall be in a manner approved by the City. The owner/developer shall supply all pertinent materials for the Landscape Maintenance District.

92. The applicant shall comply with the City of Clovis Water Efficient Landscape Requirements Ordinance.

93. The applicant shall contact and address all requirements of the Fresno Irrigation District (FID). This may include dedicating easements, piping or relocating any existing FID canals and ditches, replacing any existing irrigation piping, concrete lining or improving any existing canals, construction or reconstruction of any canals, culverts, and bridge crossings. Plans for these requirements and improvements shall be included as in the previously required set of construction plans, and shall be submitted to and approved by FID prior to the release of any development permits or recording of the final tract map. If a FID or private irrigation line is to be abandoned, the applicant shall provide waivers from all downstream users.

94. The applicant shall indicate on construction drawings the depth, location and type of material of any existing Fresno Irrigation District's irrigation line along the proposed or existing street rights-of-way or onsite. Any existing canals shall be piped. The material of the existing pipe shall be upgraded to the proper class of rubber gasket pipe at all locations unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

95. The applicant shall apply to the Fresno Irrigation District (FID) for transfer of irrigation water rights to the City of Clovis, if the property has not already been removed from FID and transferred to the City. The applicant shall execute a “Request for Change of Relative Value” that can be obtained and processed through FID. The applicant shall provide a copy of the completed form to the City.

96. All existing agricultural irrigation systems either on -site or in public right of way, whether FID or privately owned, shall be identified prior to any construction activity on the site.

Service to all downstream users of irrigation water shall be maintained at all times through 88 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

preservation of existing facilities or, if the existing facilities are required to be relocated, the relocation and replacement of the existing facilities. It is the intent that downstream users not bear any burden as a result of development of the site. Therefore, the applicant shall pay all costs related to modification, relocation, or repair of any existing irrigation facilities resulting from or necessitated by the development of the site. The applicant shall identify on site plans and construction p lans, all existing irrigation systems and their disposition (abandonment, repair, relocation, and/or piping). The applicant shall consult with the Fresno Irrigation District for any additional requirements for lines to be abandoned, relocated, or piped. The applicant shall provide waivers from all users in order to abandon or modify any irrigation pipelines or for any service interruptions resulting from development activities.

97. The applicant shall provide a landscape and irrigation perpetual maintenance covenant recorded for landscaping installed in the public right -of-way behind the curb including easements that will not be maintained by the Clovis Landscape Maintenance District. A recordable covenant shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Clovis City Engineer prior to final map approval.

98. The applicant shall provide a perimeter wall perpetual maintenance covenant on all properties that have a perimeter wall that is installed on private property. A recordable covenant shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Clovis City Engineer prior to final map approval.

Miscellaneous

99. The applicant shall install street lights. Street lights along the major streets shall be installed on metal poles to local utility provider’s standards at the locations designated by the City Engineer. Street light locations shall be shown on the utility plans submitted with the final map for approval. Street lights at future traffic signal locations shall be installed on approved traffic signal poles, including all conduits and pull boxes. Street lights along the major streets shall be owned and maint ained by local utility providers. Proof of local utility provider’s approval shall be provided. The applicant may install thematic lighting, as approved by the City Engineer. If the applicant chooses to install thematic lighting, the applicant shall provide a conceptual lighting plan identifying adjacent properties that may be incorporated with thematic lights to create a neighborhood effect. Thematic lighting owned by the City shall be maintained by an additional landscape maintenance assessment.

100. The applicant shall install all major street monumentation and section corner monumentation within the limits of the project work in accordance with City Standard ST - 32 prior to final acceptance of the project. Monumentation shall include all section corners, all street centerline intersection points, angle points and beginning and end of curves (E.C.'s & B.C.'s). The applicant/contractor shall furnish brass caps. Any existing section corner or property corner monuments damaged by this development shall be reset to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A licensed land surveyor or civil engineer licensed to perform land surveying shall certify the placement of all required monumentation prior to final 89 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

acceptance. Brass caps required for installation of new monuments or replacement of existing monuments shall be provided by the contractor/the applicant and approved by City prior to installation. Within five days after the final setting of all monuments has been completed, the engineer or surveyor shall give written notice to the City Engineer that the final monuments have been set. Upon payment to the engineer or surveyor for setting the final monuments, the applicant shall present to the City Engineer evidence of the payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor.

101. A deferment, modification, or waiver of any engineering conditions shall require the express written approval of the City Engineer.

102. The conditions given herein are for the entire development. Additional requirements for individual phases may be necessary pending review by the City Engineer.

Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) Comments (Amjad M. Qader, FMFCD Representative – 559-456-3292)

103. The applicant shall refer to the attached FMFCD correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the FMFCD for the requirements.

Fresno Irrigation District (FID) Comments
(Jeremy Landrith, Department Representative – 559-233-7161 ext. 7407)

104. The applicant shall refer to the attached FID correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the FID for the list of requirements.

County of Fresno Health Department Comments
(Kevin Tsuda, County of Fresno Health Department Representative – 559-600-3271)

105. The applicant shall refer to the attached Fresno County Health Department correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the Health Department for the list of requirements.

California Department of Transportation
(Kaylie Schreihans, Caltrans Representative – 559-383-5944)

106. The applicant shall refer to the attached Caltrans correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the Caltrans for the list of requirements.

County of Fresno Dept. of Public Works and Planning
(David Randall, Department Representative – 559-600-4052)

107. The applicant shall refer to the attached County of Fresno correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the County of Fresno for the list of requirements.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) 90 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

(Ryan Grossman, District Representative – 559-230-6569)

108. The applicant shall refer to the attached SJVAPCD correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the SJVSPCD for the list of requirements.

Clovis Unified School District
(Andrew Nabors, CUSD Representative – 559-327-9264)

109. The applicant shall refer to the attached CUSD correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the CUSD for the list of requirements.

Department of Fish and Wildlife
(Kelley Nelson, CDFW Representative – 559-580-3194)

110. The applicant shall refer to the attached CDFW correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the DTSC for the list of requirements.

91 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Attachment 2
RESOLUTION 25-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS APPROVING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2024-001 FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6375 LOCATED EAST OF NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE BETWEEN EAST PERRIN

AND EAST SHEPHERD AVENUES
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, LLC (“Applicant”), 8080 N. Palm Avenue Suite 110, Fresno, CA 93711, submitted an application for Planned Development Permit (“PDP”) 2024-001 (“PDP2024 -001”) to deviate from the R -1 Zone District development standards associated with Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6375 (“TM6375”) for a 385 -lot single -family subdivision (“Project”) on approximately 58.9 acres of property located east of North Minnewawa Avenue between East Perrin and East Shepherd Avenues (“Property”); and

WHEREAS, PDP2024-001 is in keeping with the intent and purpose of Chapter 66 of Title 9 of the Clovis Municipal Code (Development Code); and

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered PDP2024-001 on November 21, 2024, at which time the Commission adopted a resolu tion recommending that the City Council approve said PDP; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission’s recommendations were forwarded to the City Council for consideration; and

WHEREAS, a duly noticed hearing was held on December 16, 2024, at which time the City Council considered PDP2024-001; and

WHEREAS, on January 21, 2025, the City Council continued PDP2024-001 to a date uncertain; and
WHEREAS, the City published notice of the public hearing in the Fresno Business Journal on January 10, 2025 mailed public notices to property owners within 600 feet of the Property, ten (10) days prior to said City Council hearing, and otherwise posted notice of the Public Hearing according to applicable law; and

WHEREAS, based on th e California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) analysis , a mitigated negative declaration and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program was adopted for the Project by City Council on December 16, 2024; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the entire Administrative Record relating to the Project, which is on file with the Department, and reviewed and considered those portions of the Administrative Record determined to be necessary to make an info rmed decision, including, but not necessarily limited to, the staff report, the written materials submitted with the request, and the verbal and written testimony and other evidence presented during the public hearing, and the conditions of approval attach ed as Attachment A to this Resolution, which are incorporated herein by this reference.

92 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AND FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council hereby approves PDP2024 -001, subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Attachment A of this Resolution.

2. The Project satisfies the required findings for approval of a planned development permit, as follows:

a. The Project is allowed within the subject base zoning district;

b. The Project is consistent with the purpose, intent, goals, policies, actions, and land use designations of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan;

c. The Project is generally in compliance with all of the applicable provisions of this Development Code relating to both on - and off-site improvements that are necessary to accommodate flexibility in site planning and property development and to carry out the purpose, intent, and requirements of this chapter and the subject base zoning district, includi ng prescribed development standards and applicable design guidelines;

d. The Project ensures compatibility of property uses within the zoning district and general neighborhood of the proposed development;

e. The Project would produce a comprehensive development of superior quality (e.g., appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high quality architectural design, increased amounts of landscaping and open space, improved solutions to the design and placement of parking facilities, incorporation of a program of enhanced amenities, etc.) than which might otherwise occur from more
traditional development applications;

f. Proper standards and conditions have been imposed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare;

g. Proper on-site traffic circulation and control is designed into the development to ensure protection for fire suppression and police surveillance equal to or better than what would normally be created by compliance with the minimum setback and parcel width standards identified in Division 2 of this title (Zoning Districts, Allowable Land Uses, and Zone-Specific Standards);

h. The subject parcel is adequate in terms of size, shape, topography, and circumstances to accommodate the proposed development; and

i. The design, location, operating characteristics, and size of the proposed development would be compatible with the existing and future land 93 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
uses in the vicinity, in terms of aesthetic values, character, scale, and view protection.

3. The City Council adopted the mitigated negative declaration mitigation and monitoring and reporting program for the Project on December 16, 2024.

4. Without the conditions of approval (Attachment A of this resolution), the City Council could not make the findings necessary for approval of PDP2024-001.

* * * * *

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on January 21, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

94 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Attachment A
Conditions of Approval – PDP2024-001
(Text modifications are in Bold & Underline)
(Text deletions are in Strikethrough)

Planning Division Comments
(Liz Salazar, Assistant Planner – 559-324-2305)

1. The Project must produce a comprehensive development of superior quality than which might otherwise occur from more traditional development on the site. This will be reviewed and approved through the civil plan review process and residential site plan review.

2. Three (3) pocket parks totaling approximately 56,400 square feet with associated amenities shall be constructed as the private amenity. Two (2) pocket parks totaling approximately 43,850 square feet with the following amenities: shade structure, patio tables, BBQ stations, children’s playground equipment with a shade sail, serpentine walking paths with two seating areas, and open grass space shall be construct ed as the private amenity.

3. As a public amenity for the Project, the developer shall contribute the dollar amount totaling $95,450 to the City for utilization in existing or future open space and/or park improvements.

4. The developer shall construct a minimum six-foot high solid split face masonry wall along the limits of TM6375 adjacent to N. Minnewawa and Clovis Avenue.

5. The developer shall screen all ground mounted mechanical equipment from public view from abutting public streets and rights-of-way and open space uses. Screening material shall be constructed of materials consistent with the superior quality of the PDP and Heritage Grove Design Guidelines.

6. Lots with front facing elevations along N. Minnewawa Avenue sha ll adhere to front yard fencing standards. Fencing shall be limited to three (3) feet in height for material limiting 50% or more of visibility and seven (7) feet in height for material providing 50% or more of visibility. Fencing material shall be consistent with Heritage Grove Design Guidelines. Chain link is not permitted.

7. Landscape features and forms within amenity areas shall be consistent with Heritage Grove Design Guidelines. Details shall be provided in the construction plan.

8. No more than two (2) of the same unit type (floor layout and exterior materials package) shall be repeated side by side. When two (2) of the same units are repeated side by side, they shall be different colors. These identical provisions may be waived by the City Planner on a specific lot basis within the project when the size or configuration of a lot would otherwise prevent compliance with the above requirements of any other siting or setback/yard requirements established under this application. If such a waiver is requested, the developer and City Planner shall work together to ensure that any sitings of units not in 95 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
compliance with t he above requirements shall be of different materials and elevations in order to minimize any adverse visual impacts that may result.

9. Setbacks shall be measured to the exterior face of the framing of the structure. Exceptions to the setbacks are identified in § 9.24.100, of the Clovis Municipal Code.

10. Development standards for the lots of TM6375 shall be as follows:

20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)
20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)

11. All lighting shall be screened from direct view from the public right -of-way and adjacent residential properties.

12. The developer shall utilize streetlights along local and private streets within the development area that are of the same design and luminosity as surrounding developments within Heritage Grove.

13. A residential site plan review is required to memorialize building plans and elevations for the different product types of TM6 375. Specific color and materials of the models, walls, amenities, landscaping, and fencing will be evaluated through the civil plans.

96 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Attachment 3
RESOLUTION 25-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS MAKING

APPLICATION TO THE FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION AND

REQUESTING THE COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE SHEPHERD-

MINNEWAWA NORTHEAST REORGANIZATION
WHEREAS, the City of Clovis desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese - Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for the reorganization; and

WHEREAS, the specific changes of organization requested are annexation to the City of Clovis and detachment from the Fresno County Fire Protection District; and

WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be reorganized is inhabited , and on this day contains 18 voters, according to information received from the County Election Officer; and

WHEREAS, a description of the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Attachment A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and

WHEREAS, the proposal complies with the terms and standards of the tax sharing agreement between the City of Clovis and the County of Fresno; and

WHEREAS, on December 16, 2024 , the City Council adopted the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) analysis adopting the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the annexation and development project of the property, which is the subject of the Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization; and

WHEREAS, it is desired to provide that the proposed Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization be subject to the following terms and conditions:

1. The regular assessment roll shall be utilized.

2. Each new development will be required to demonstrate adequate water availability and, if necessary, will be required to drill and test a well, and to connect it to the city water system.

3. Each new development will be required to obtain sewage capacity from the t runk sewer specified by the City Engineer.

4. The provisions of Article II, Annexation by City, as agreed between the City of Clovis and the County of Fresno pursuant to the June 6, 2017 , Memorandum of Understanding, as amended from time to time, regarding tax sharing shall apply.

5. The applicants shall reimburse the City for any expense associated with the transition agreement for fire services with the Fresno County Fire Protection District that would apply to this proposal.

97 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

6. A "Right -to-Farm" covenant shall be recorded for each tract map or made a condition of each tract map.

7. Pursuant to Government Code Section 56663, the City shall consent to the annexation and waive its rights to a hearing.

8. Prior to approval, recordation or filing of an annexation, tentative map, final map, parcel map, or site plan (Project), the property covered by the Project shall be included within or annexed to a Community Facilities District (CFD), established by the City for the provision of public facilities and services, for which proceedings have been consummated, and shall be subject to the special tax approved with the formation or annexation to the CFD.

The applicant and the property owner acknowledge and agree that if the Project was not part of a CFD, the City might lack the financial resources to operate facilities and provide public services, such as police protection, fire protection, emergency medical services, parks and recreation services, street maintenance, and public transit. Absent the requirement for inclu sion of the Project within a CFD, the City might not be able to make the finding that the Project is consistent with the General Plan and relevant specific plans, and might not be able to make the findings supporting approval of the Project as required by the Subdivision Map Act and the California Environmental Quality Act, and the City might be required to deny the application for the Project.

The owner/developer shall notify all potential lot buyers prior to sale that this Project is a part of a Communit y Facilities District and shall inform potential buyers of the special tax amount. Said notification shall be in a manner approved by the City.

This requirement may be waived in the discretion of the City Council if, at the time of the approval, recordation, or filing of the Project, the City Council has determined that it is not necessary that the Project be included in the CFD.

WHEREAS, the terms and conditions above are the sole responsibility of the City of Clovis to monitor and enforce. The Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission will not be required to enforce the aforesaid terms and conditions as a responsible agency; and

WHEREAS, the reason for this proposed reorganization is to provide municipal services, local controls, and logical growth to the unincorporated area of the County that is remote from County services and undergoing urban development; and

WHEREAS, this annexation proposal is consistent with the proposed City of Clovis’ general plan land use diagram designations; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and approved the master service plan for the subject change of organization; and

98 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AND FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The annexation of property within the boundaries set forth in Attachment A is in compliance with the Standards of Annexation as identified in the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Clovis and the County of Fresno, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Sharing Agreement.

2. This Resolution of Application is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Clovis, and the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to take proceedings for the reorganization of the territory as described in Attachment A, according to the terms and conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.

* * * * *

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Ci ty Council of the City of Clovis held on January 21, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

99 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Attachment A

CITY OF CLOVIS ANNEXATION

AREA TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF CLOVIS GEOGRAPHIC

DESCRIPTION

Being a portion of the West Half of Section 20 together with a portion of the East 30 feet of Section 19 and the South 40 feet of Section 17, Township 12 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base & Meridian, according to the Official United States Government Township Plat thereof, in the County of Fresno, State of California, described as follows:

BEGINNING at the Southeast Corner of said Section 19 and running along the South and West right-of-way line of Minnewawa Avenue according to the Grant Deed thereof recorded in Book 6706 at Page 288, Official Record Fresno County, the following 2 courses:

1. South 89°21'21” West, 30.00 feet along the South line of said Section 19 to the West right-of-way line of Minnewawa Avenue; thence

2. North 1°06'32” West, 5296.80 feet along the West right-of-way line of Minnewawa Avenue to the North line of said Section 19; thence Along the West, North, and East right-of-way lines of Behymer Avenue according to the map thereof recorded in Book 2 of Record of Surveys at Page 46, Fresno County Records, the following 2 courses:

3. North 1°06’32” West, 20.00 feet to the North right-of-way line of Behymer Avenue; thence

4. North 89°22’30” East, 1584.19 feet along the North right-of-way line of Behymer Avenue; thence
Leaving the right-of-way of Behymer Avenue, parallel with and 20.00 feet North of the North line of said Northwest quarter, continuing along the Easterly lines of Parcel 1 as well as the Easterly lines of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 2170 according to the map thereof recorded in Volume 13 of Parcel Maps at Page 35, Fresno County Records, also being the centerline of Enterprise Canal for the following 6 courses:

5. South 14°39’10” East, 679.67 feet along said Enterprise Canal; thence

6. South 26°57’27” East, 37.00 feet continuing along said Enterprise Canal; thence

7. South 48°08’27” East, 149.44 feet; thence

8. South 0°13’46” East, 294.28 feet; thence

9. South 24°09’58” East, 170.98 feet; thence

10. South 5°53’29” East, 99.75 feet; thence
Leaving the centerline of Enterprise Canal and running along the North line of Adjusted Parcel B of Lot Line Adjustment No. 21-06 as described in Grant Deed recorded on September 8, 2021 as Document No. 2021-0146955, Official Records Fresno County; along the East and South lines of said Adjusted Parcel B, being the following 15 courses:

11. North 89°22’23” East, 61.02 feet; thence

12. South 0°59’37” East, 72.67 feet to a tangent curve concave to the Northwest; thence
100
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

13. 101.97 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 26°33'24" having a radius of 220.00 feet; thence

14. South 25°33’46” West, 342.65 feet to a tangent curve concave to the Southeast; thence

15. 129.78 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 26°33'24" having a radius of 280.00 feet; thence

16. South 0°59’37” East, 492.40 feet; thence

17. South 5°41’23” East, 180.24 feet; thence

18. South 5°16’32” East, 241.23 feet; thence

19. South 17°21’08” East, 355.48 feet to a tangent curve concave to the Northeast; thence

20. 226.11 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 74°01'42" having a radius of 175.00 feet; thence

21. North 88°37’10” East, 159.93 feet; thence

22. North 83°58’08” East, 159.90 feet; thence

23. North 78°57’55” East, 272.20 feet to the East line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 20; thence

24. South 0°56’40” East, 70.49 feet along said East line; thence

25. South 89°22’03” West, 1324.97 feet along said North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence
Along the East and South line of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 20 according to the map of Tract Map No. 6050 thereof recorded in Volume 90 of Plats at

Page 37 ends

26. South 1°01’26” East, 1956.64 feet along the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 20 to a point on the North line Shepherd Avenue right-of-way; thence

27. South 89°21’21” West, 1322.00 feet along the North right-of-way line for Shepherd Avenue to a point on the East line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 19; thence

28. South 1°06’32” East, 30.00 feet along said East line to the POINT OF BEGINNING

CONTAINS 200.38 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.

101
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services
DATE: December 16, 2024
SUBJECT: Consider various items associated with approximately 201 acres on the east side of N. Minnewawa Avenue, between East Behymer and Shepherd Avenues. Multiple, owners; Lennar Homes , applicant; Yamabe & Horn Engineering Inc., representative.
a. Consider Approval - Res. 24 -__, A resolution of the City Council adopting an e nvironmental finding of a mitigated negative declaration and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program for Reorganization 310, Prezone 2024-005, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6375, and Planned Development Permit 2024-001.
b. Consider Introduction - Ord. 24-__, R2024-005, An ordinance of the City Council approving a request to prezone property within the annexation area from the Fresno County AE20 Zone District to the Clovis C-1, R-1-PRD, O, and P-C-C Zone Districts.
c. Consider Approval - Res. 24 -__, TM6375, A resolution of the City Council approving a vesting tentative tract map for a 385-lot single-family planned residential development on approximately 58.9 acres of land. d. Consider Approval - Res. 24-__, PDP2024-001, A resolution of the City Counc il approving a planned development permit for a 385 -lot single-family residential development.
e. Consider Approval - Res. 24 -___, RO310, A resolution of the City Council approving application for the annexation of the territory known as the Shepherd -Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization area (approximately 201 acres).

Staff: Liz Salazar, Assistant Planner
Recommendation: Approve

1882
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Attachment 4
102
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution CEQA

2. Draft Ordinance R2024-005

3. Draft Resolution TM6375

4. Draft Resolution PDP2024-001

5. Draft Resolution RO310

6. Proposed Development Standards for PDP2024-001

7. Landscape Plan with PDP2024-001 Park Amenity

8. Elevations and Floor Plans

9. Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMRP

10. Correspondence from Commenting Agencies

11. Site Specific Service Plan

RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council take action to approve each component of the proposed Project as outlined in the subject title of this item.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Lennar Homes (“Applicant”) is requesting approval for a series of entitlement applications including a prezone (“R2024 -005”), a vesting tentative tract map (“TM6375”), planned development permit (“PDP2024 -001”), and an annexation (“RO310”) , hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Project”. This Project is designed as a 385 -lot planned single -family development within the City’s Heritage Grove planned growth area. The Project site is a portion of the larger ±201 -acre annexation area. Approval of this Project would enable City staff to proceed with the annexation process through Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) and would enable the Applicant to proceed with the processing of a residential site plan review (“RSPR”) entitlement and development drawings.

BACKGROUND
 General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential (4.1 – 7.0 DU/Ac)  Master Plan Designation: Heritage Grove Master Plan
 Existing Zoning: Fresno County AE20 Zone District
 Parcel Size: ±58.9 acres (annexation area ±201 acres)  Current Land Use: Agriculture and vacant
 Adjacent Land Uses:
o North: Rural Residential & Agricultural
o South: Rural Residential & Single-Family Residential
o East: Single-Family Residential
o West: Agricultural

The Project site is located within the City’s Heritage Grove Urban Center that encompasses four square miles within the northwest sphere of influence area of Clovis. Heritage Grove is one of three Urban Centers identified in the City’s General Plan and designed as sub-communities that enable the City to grow while maintaining authentic, small town character and overall livability.

A goal within the Heritage Grove Urban Center is to achieve compact development patterns that integrate a variety of housing typ es, sizes, and densities at the neighborhood and community level, and development of a well-connected grid system of roads. 1883
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

See updated attachments in January 21, 2025 City Council staff report. 103
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS
The Project proposes a 385-lot, non-gated planned single-family development on a ±54.60-acre portion of the total ±58.9-acre site. The remainder of the site is planned for a future park and is not included as part of the development. The Project site is designated for Medium Density (4.1 – 7.0 DU/Ac) in the Clovis General Plan and the Project conforms with the ex isting designation by proposing at the maximum density of 7 dwelling units per acre. The Project would include construction of public and private streets, sidewalks, landscaped areas, and three (3) pocket parks with related amenities. The Project will also include a Homeowner’s Association (“HOA”).

Approximately 40 of the overall ±58.9-acre Project site will be included in the proposed ±201- acre annexation boundary . The remaining ±1 8.9 acres were included in a recent annexation (RO305) approved by the City Council. As depicted in Figure 1 below, the Project site and proposed annexation area are located on the south side of E. Behymer Avenue, east of N.

Minnewawa Avenue, generally west of the Enterprise Canal, and north of Shepherd Avenue.

Figure 1 – Project Area

= Annexation Boundary
= Project Site TM6375
N
1884
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
104
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Prezone and Planned Development Permit

Prezone
The Project also requires a prezone and planned development permit (PDP). The proposed prezone, R2024 -005, will designate a City zone district of R-1-PRD (Single -Family Planned Residential Development) to the Project site. Additionally, the application will encompass the prezoning of several other sites slated for annexation from Fresno County Zoning to City of Clovis Zoning. This prezoning process is a prerequisite for the integration of the sites into the City. Figure 2 below illustrates the proposed zoning for each property, all of which will align with their perspective underlying General Plan designations.

Figure 2 – Zone Districts

1885
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
105
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Prezone Required Findings and Analysis
The subsequent findings are necessary to approve an application for prezone.

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan;

The proposed prezone (R2024-005) conforms to the existing General Plan designations for sites within the annexation area, extending beyond the 58.9 acre Project site. The prezoning aligns internally with the outlined goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan.

a. Land Use Element - Goal 3: Orderly and sustainable outward growth into three Urban Centers with neighborhoods that provide a balanced mix of land uses and development types to support a community lifestyle and small town character.

The Project is proposed within the Heritage Grove Urban Center, one of the three Urban Centers designated by the General Plan to facilitate growth in a manner that prioritizes high quality, fiscal sustainability and balance. Approval of the Project would contribute to fulfilling the design guidelines of the urban center, encompassing circulation patterns, public facilities, and aesthetic considerations.

b. Land Use Element - Goal 3, Policy 3.9: Connected development. New development in Urban Centers must fully improve roadway, pedestrian, and bicycle systems within and adjacent to the proposed project and connect to existing urbanized development.

Circulation Element - Goal 1: A comprehensive and well-maintained multimodal circulation system that provides for safe and efficient movement of people and goods.

The Project has been designed to fulfill both the circulation requirements outlined in the General Plan and the design guidelines specific to Heritage Grove. The development will enhance the adjacent streetscape along N. Minnewawa and develop Clovis Avenu e along the Project’s frontage, as well as internal local streets within the Project site. Development of Clovis Avenue will provide connection to the existing City developments situated immediately to the south and east of the Project site, thereby contributing to the overall street grid system in the area.

c. Land Use Element - Goal 3, Policy 5.1: Housing variety in developments.

Housing variety in developments. The Clovis General Plan has been planned to provide a variety of housing product types suitable to each state of a person’s life. Each development should contribute to a diversity of housing sizes and types within the standards appropriate to the land use designation.

Land Use Element - Goal 5: A city with housing, employment, and lifestyle opportunities for all ages and incomes of residents.
1886
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
106
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

The Project proposes a mixture of housing products with lot sizes ranging from 2,112 to 17,353 square feet, including compact single -family residential homes. Typically, with the incorporation of smaller-than-standard lot sizes and the creation of smaller homes, the cost of a home is reduced. Therefore, potentially creating opportunities for home ownership for families and individuals with moderate incomes.

Furthermore, the Project will contribute towards the City’s housing inventory. Offering a non- traditional single-family development, it adds to the diversity of housing options in Clovis. The development presents three distinct product types, which includes Lennar’s Wilde, Treasures and Core style homes. The Wilde product features 2 -story smaller lot sizes, while the Treasures and Core products offer larger lots with homes ranging from single -story to 2 stories. With these three product types complementing the already unique single -family residential development, the Project will enhance the variety of housing options available within the City's existing housing stock.

2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City;

The Project is located within the City's designated growth area and has undergone comprehensive evaluation by multiple City departments and external agencies for feedback.

Importantly, no significant concerns were raised by these stakeholders. Additionally, th e Project's environmental impacts have been assessed through the accompanying Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (“ISMND”). The ISMND concluded that the environmental impacts were determined to be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures.

3. The parcel is physically suitable (including absence of physical constraints, access, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and provision of utilities) for the requested zoning designations and anticipated land uses/ projects.

The Project site is well suited to accommodate the proposed 385-lot single-family residential subdivision and necessary utility connections to the site. Situated directly west of the current city limits, the Project shares proximity with similar single-family residential developments to the south and east. The Project site is situated adjacent to single -family homes in various densities to the south and east. Westward, across N. Minnewawa Avenue, agricultural lands border the Project site. The Project's locat ion is consistent with both existing and planned surrounding land uses.

Planned Development Permit
The proposed R-1-PRD designation for the Project site is consistent with the existing Medium Density Residential general plan designation. The R -1-PRD Zone District is appropriate for single-family small lot uses, including attached and detached single -family structures on small lots. PDPs are required for all planned residential developments, including the proposed Project (Clovis Municipal Code [“CMC”] § 9.10.010, subd. (B)(6).). PDPs facilitate design flexibility and encourage innovative and superior site planning, culminating in a comprehensive development of high quality. Further details regarding the PDP are outlined below. 1887
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
107
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Development Standards
The PDP provides the flexibility to adjust or modify development standards, such as building coverage, height, setbacks, fence and wall heights, landscaping, open space, and street layout, where necessary and justifiable. The Applicant is requesting approval of a non-gated detached single-family PDP with reduced parcel size, reduced setbacks and increased lot coverage. The table below outlines the proposed development standards for the Project. There are three housing product types that are distinguishable by thei r elevation and floor plans. While the Applicant has provided models for each of their products, the home models will be assessed against the established development standards and formalized through the RSPR process, which has been included as a condition of approval for the tract map and PDP. The proposed development standards for TM6375 are outlined below in Table 1.

Table 1 above delineates alterations to the customary development criteria. For comparison, the last column of the table provides standards for the typical zone district consistent with Medium Density, specifically the R -1-MD Zone District. The requested deviatio ns specifically include a reduction in lot size, parcel width and depth, setbacks, height, non -standard garages, and an increase in parcel coverage. Staff has reviewed the proposed development standards mentioned above for the proposed single-family residential development and found them to be compatible with similar projects recently approved through the PDP process. The Wilde portion of the Project proposes a zero-lot line on the garage side with a minimum of a seven (7) foot setback on the opposite from the garage. The side with a seven (7) foot minimum setback will include a fenced uncovered patio area that will also accommodate toter storage. A condition of approval is recommended requiring a paved path leading from the street to a gate for each uncovered patio area. For parcels identified with a zero (0) foot interior setback, staff recommends a condition of Table 1 - PDP Development Standards
Standard
Housing Products Typical City Standards
R-1-MD (Medium
Density)
Wilde
(188 units)
Treasures
(90 units)
Core
(107 units)
Minimum Lot Size (Square Feet) 2,112 4,230 4,230 4,500
Minimum Parcel Width 39’ 45’ 45’ 50’
Minimum Corner Parcel Width N/A 50’ 50’ 50’
Minimum Reverse Parcel Width N/A 55’ 55’ 50’
Minimum Parcel Depth 53’ 94’ 94’ 90’
Maximum Lot Coverage 62% 52% 45% 45%
Maximum Height 26’ 7” 18’ 11” 25’ 3” 35’
Front (Garage side) Setback 4’ 20’ 20’ 20’
Front (Living side) Setback 10’ 12’ 12’ 15’
Interior Side Setback 0’ non-patio side
7’ patio side 5’ 5’ 5’
Street Side Setbacks 3’ 10’ 10’ 10’
Rear Setback 10’ 10’ 20’ 15’
Garages
20’x20’ interior
dimension (2-car)

20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)
20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)
20’X22’ interior dimension
(2-car)
1888
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
108
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
approval requiring acceptable covenant and deed restrictions allowing access to the abutting properties for repair and maintenance purposes.

Residential Site Plan Review
The Applicant will be required to submit an RSPR in order to allow staff to review lot -specific development standards. Specific color and materials of the models, walls, amenities, landscaping, and fencing will be evaluated through the civil plans.

Parking
Per planned residential development standards, the minimum parking requirement is two (2) covered spaces, plus one (1) covered or uncovered guest space for each dwelling unit.

Therefore, the Project will provide a minimum of 770 c overed spaces and 385 guest spaces.

The Applicant is proposing a two -car garage for each unit. The Treasures and Core products include driveways, which count towards the guest parking. The Wilde products propose 258 uncovered street parking, thus meeting t he minimum parking requirements for the overall development. Each two-car garage shall provide a minimum size of twenty (20) feet by twenty (20) feet interior dimension, which will be reviewed with the residential site plan review.

Homeowners Association
Although the Project is non -gated, an HOA is required for the purpose of maintaining open spaces and common areas, which will ensure they remain well -kept and functional, as well as enforcing the covenants, conditions and restrictions. This requirement is designed to uphold community standards and elevate the quality of life for residents within the Project's jurisdiction.

Proposed Amenities
Chapter 9.66 of the Clovis Municipal Code (Planned Development Permits) provides for flexibility in development standards to accommodate various development types that may not conform to standard regulations. Within this context, planned residential developments are mandated to provide a program of amenities proportional to the deviations being requested. Amenities may include, but are not limited to, features such as open space and improvements to the existing public facilities, such as parks and trails. It’s important to note that PDP amenities are assessed on a project-by-project basis, as each development is unique in terms of its scale, location and context.

In exchange for the requested development standard deviations described in Table 1 of the report, the Applicant is proposing a combination of an on -site amenity that is targeted towards homeowners and an of f-site amenity that will provide a general public benefit. The Project proposes three pocket parks, totaling approximately 56,425 square feet. Each pocket park will be equipped with a BBQ station, picnic tables, seat walls, and grass area. The two (2) southern parks will include a shade structure, while the northern park includes a children’s swing set. A conceptual illustration of the proposed parks is shown in Figure 3 below.

When assessing and determining an adequate amenity that would provide a gener al public benefit, staff evaluated opportunities for open space and other public improvements within and near the proposed tract map. Staff identified construction of the planned trail along N. Sunnyside 1889
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
109
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Avenue, adjacent to the existing PG&E substation. This portion of the trail will have a 50-foot- wide easement, including a 20-foot parkway, 12 -foot walk and an 18 -foot landscape buffer as shown in Figure 4 below. However, due to the overall cost and need to obtain the right-of-way, this option proved not to be proportionate to the Project.

In the absence of a physical improvement to serve as an amenity, the Applicant has agreed to contribute a dollar amount totaling approximately $95,450, based on a calculation methodology recently utilized in conjunction with other projects. This monetary amount will be reserved for utilization towards the portion of the trail along N. Sunnyside Avenue, adjacent to the PG&E substation. Ultimately, if development of this portion of the trail is infeasible, the funds could b e used for alternative public benefit improvement outside of the Project vicinity, such as development of shade structures and seating areas within the following neighborhood parks:

Woods Park (TM5146), Pinnacles Park (TM5002) or Countryside Park (TM4732/5545).

It is important to highlight that, in addition to the requirement for proportional amenities, approval of a PDP necessitates the demonstration of superior development quality compared to what could be achieved through conventional development practi ces on the site. This might entail enhancements, such as upgraded entry points, embellished block walls along street frontages and superior exterior elevation design. These features are typically integrated into the proposed planned development projects by the Applicant, subject to review and approval during the civil plan review process and residential site plan evaluation for individual lots.

Figure 3 – Proposed Open Space

Figure 4 – Sunnyside PG&E Trail Easement

1890
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
110
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Planned Development Permits Required Findings and Analysis The required findings for the approval of a PDP application, and staff’s response to each of those findings are listed below. (CMC § 9.66.060.)

1. The PDP would:

a. Be allowed within the subject base zoning district.

The proposed PDP2024 -001 is permissible within the R -1-PRD Zone District, which is proposed concurrently with the pre-zoning of the Project site.

b. Be consistent with the purpose, intent, goals, policies, actions, and land use designations of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

The Project proposes a single-family residential use, which is consistent with the established land use of the General Plan. Refer to number 1 of the Prezone Findings and Analysis section.

c. Be generally in compliance with all of the applicable provisions of this Development Code relating to both on - and off -site improvements that are necessary to accommodate flexibility in site planning and property development and to carry out the purpose, inte nt, and requirements of this chapter and the subject base zoning district, including prescribed development standards and applicable design guidelines.

Although the Project requests deviations from development standards, the requested PDP is compliant with the prescribed development standards attached hereto as Attachment 4. 1891
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
111
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

The Project proposes to construct both on -site and off -site improvements as required and directed by the City Engineer to ensure compliance with the City’s Development Code.

d. Ensure compatibility of property uses within the zoning district and general neighborhood of the proposed development.

The Project shares a comparable density and development type with the existing surrounding developments, thus ensuring compatibility within the area.

2. The proposed Project would produce a comprehensive development of superior quality (e.g., appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high-quality architectural design, increased amounts of landscaping and open space, improved solutions to the design and placement of parking facilities, incorporation of a program of enhanced amenities, etc.) than which might otherwise occur from more traditional development applications.

The Project will provide an amenity program associated with the PDP as described in the Proposed Amenities section of this report. The architectural design of the homes will undergo thorough evaluation during the RSPR process to ensure high quality. Furthermore, enhanced landscaping will be required throughout the Project as part of the Project's aesthetic improvements.

3. Proper standards and conditions have been imposed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.

PDP2024-001 will comply the Dev elopment Code, with Fire Department standards and Building Code regulations to ensure adherence to public health and safety requirements.

4. Proper on -site traffic circulation and control is designed into the development to ensure protection for fire suppres sion and police surveillance equal to or better than what would normally be created by compliance with the minimum setback and parcel width standards identified in Division 2 of this title (Zoning Districts, Allowable Land Uses, and Zone-Specific Standards).

PDP2024-001 will adhere to the standards set by the Fire Department and the requirements of the City Engineer concerning fire suppression measures and enhancements to traffic flow related to TM6375, respectively.

5. The subject parcel is adequate in term s of size, shape, topography, and circumstances to accommodate the proposed development.

The proposed TM6375 associated with the requested PDP proposes to develop 385 units with the average lot size of 3,698 square feet. Therefore, the site is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed Project.

1892
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
112
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

6. The design, location, operating characteristics, and size of the proposed development would be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity, in terms of aesthetic values, character, scale, and view protection.

As indicated above, the PDP2024-001 is compatible with the existing and planned adjacent land uses. In regard to view protection, the PDP proposes a reduced maximum height limit than that prescribed under the comparable R-1-MD Zone District. The proposed development will process a RSPR application where aesthetics and design will be evaluated in compliance with the Development Code.

Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6375
As shown in Attachment 3A, the Applicant is requesting approval of TM6375 for 385 lots with various outlots for the purposes of private streets and open space. The proposed TM6375 features a range of lot sizes from 2,112 square feet to 17,353 square feet, with an average size of about 3,698 square feet. This tract map is organized into three (3) non -gated communities (See Table 1 ). The northwestern portion will feature the developer's Core product line, the northeastern portion will feature the Treasure’s product line, while the so uthern neighborhood will showcase the more compact Wilde product line. The Core product line includes 107 units and the Treasures product line includes 90 units with sizes varying from 4,230 to 17,353 square feet. The Wilde product line (varying from 2,112 to 2,778 square feet ) proposes 188 units featuring smaller lots and more compact housing options compared to the Core and Treasures lines. Further specifics regarding the vesting tentative tract map are detailed below.

Circulation
The Project proposes four (4) points of access, two (2) along N. Minnewawa Avenue , one (1) along Clovis Avenue, and one (1) along DeWitt Avenue. North Minnewawa and Clovis Avenues will comply with the City's standards for arterial roads, including compliance with the Heritage Grove Design Guidelines. The Project includes both public and private streets. Several private streets are designed to lead to the garages of the Wilde product homes. The Project includes sidewalks along all public streets. The private internal streets will not have traditional street lined sidewalks. However, the development will provide internal pedestrian pathways within each residential block.

Sewer and Water Impact
The Project’s impacts to water and sewer facilities were analyzed during the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review. Provost and Pritchard, the City’s water system consultant, provided a summary of water system impacts and concluded that the City has capacity to serve, and that infrastructure can accommodate the Project upon comp letion of the recommended connections. The City Engineer completed a sewer analysis and concluded that the City has capacity to accommodate the Project. The Project lies within the Fresno Irrigation District (FID) boundary and therefore, is eligible to uti lize entitled surface water from the Kings River.

Heritage Grove Thematic Elements
The City’s 2014 General Plan directed the preparation and adoption of a comprehensive design document for the Heritage Grove area. As a result, the Heritage Grove Design Guidelines was 1893
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
113
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
developed and adopted on December 5, 2016. The document is intended to accommodate growth in a manner that is of high quality, fiscally sustainable and balanced. The design document establishes an overall agricultural theme and quality for Heritage Grove. It illustrates and directs the intended architectural, landscape and si te elements to reinforce the theme and quality. The proposed Project is required to adhere to design standards outlined in the Heritage Grove Design Guidelines.

The Project will develop N. Minnewawa Avenue as a thematic street and Clovis Avenue as a community boulevard as designated by the Heritage Grove Design Guidelines. The N.

Minnewawa Avenue design requires an eighteen (18) foot parkway and the N. Clovis Avenue design requires a twenty (20) foot parkway, between the right -of-way and private parcels. Staff will work with the developer to establish a design that meets the intent provided in the Heritage Grove Design Guidelines.

Vesting Tentative Tract Map Findings and Analysis
The following are findings required to approve a vesting tentative tract map (CMC §§ 9.102.060, subd. (A), and 9.102.110, subd. (C).). It is important to note that some of these findings overlap with those detailed in the previous “Planned Development Perm its Required Findings and Analysis” and “Prezone Required Findings and Analysis” sections of this report and will reference the information provided therein.

1. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

The proposed map (TM6375) design maintains consistency with both the General Plan and the proposed PDP. Refer to number 1 of the “Prezone Required Findings and Analysis” section. All improvements will adhere to the proposed conditions of approvals and City standards. The specifics of these improvements will undergo scrutiny during the City's civil plan review process to ensure compliance with standards.

2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development.

Refer to number 5 of the “Planned Development Permits Required Findings and Analysis” section.

3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

As described in the ISMND prepared for the Project (Attachment 9), environmental impacts were determined to be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures.

Consequently, the Project is not an ticipated to inflict substantial environmental harm or endanger fish and wildlife.

4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems.
1894
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
114
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

The design of the Project will comply with the Development Code, Fire Department standards and Building Code regulations to ensure adherence to public health and safety requirements.

Furthermore, during review of the Project, agencies and City departments had the opportunity to review the Project to ensure consistency with City codes and regulations and no serious public health or safety concerns were identified. Therefore, the Project was determined not to be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, or general welfare of the City.

5. The design of t he subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. This finding may also be made if the review authority finds that alternate easements for access or use will be provided, and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This finding shall apply only to easements of record, or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, and no authority is hereby granted to the review authority to determine that the public at large has acquired easements of access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

During the final map review process conducted by the City's Engineering Division, all easements will be identified. Additionally, during the final map review, the City Engineer and other outside agencies will ensure that no conflicts with easements would occur as a result of the Project. As needed, alternate easements will be found that will be substantially equivalent to those previously required in TM6375.

6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

The City Engineer has determined that the City has the capacity to accommodate the proposed Project. Installation of sewer lines within the proposed subdivision and beyond its borders will adhere to the regulations set forth by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

7. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities.

The proposed subdivision will comply with the Developm ent Code and California Building Code requirements as it relates to heating and cooling opportunities within TM6375.

8. The proposed subdivision, its design, density, and type of development and improvements conform to the regulations of this Development Cod e and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law.

The proposed subdivision is proposing a density of 7 units per acre, aligning with the Clovis General Plan's Land Use designation of Medium Density Residential (4.1 -7.0 DU/Ac).

Furthermore, the proposed subdivision comprises single-family housing, in accordance with the residential development requirements outlined in the Clovis General Plan. The proposed 1895
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
115
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
development will process an RSPR application, where aesthetics and design will be evaluated in compliance with the Development Code and established PDP development standards.

Annexation
The Project is situated within the City’s Heritage Grove planned growth area and requires annexation into the City. While the Project site encompasses approximately 58.9 acres, a larger annexation area is proposed after consultation with the County of Fresno and the LAFCo staff to establish a logical boundary for incorporation with regard to the overall annexation timing of this area. In addition to the ±58.9-acre site, the proposed annexation boundary includes properties planned for future residential development at similar densities, future community park, mixed use development, and neighborhood commercial. If approved by the City Council , the annexation application will proceed to the LAFCo for processing and final consideration.

Development of the Project cannot occur without the completion of the annexation process.

Annexation Details:

Property owners: 18
Owners Consenting to Annexation: 18
Registered Voters: 18
Acreage: ±201

Standard Conditions of Annexation:

The City established standard baseline conditions for annexation projects that are incorporated into the resolution for the proposed annexation (Attachment 5). These conditions encapsulate the mutually agreed upon tax -sharing arrangements between the City and Fresno County and scheduling of public services for the annexation sites. A site -specific service plan has been prepared demonstrating the City’s capacity to effectively serve the properties within the proposed annexation territory. The plan requires approval from the City Council and will be provided to Fresno LAFCo. The plan is provided as Attachment 11 of this report.

Consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies
Staff has evaluated the Project in light of the goals and policies of the General Plan. The following goals and policies reflect Clovis' desire to maintain Clovis’ tradition of responsible planning and well-managed growth to preserve the quality of life i n existing neighborhoods and ensure the development of new neighborhoods with an equal quality of life. These goals and polic ies seek to foster more compact development patterns that can reduce the number, length, and duration of auto trips.

Goal 3: Orderly and sustainable outward growth into three Urban Centers with neighborhoods that provide a balanced mix of land uses and development types to support a community lifestyle and small-town character.

Policy 3.5 Fiscal sustainability. The City shall r equire establishment of community facility districts, lighting and landscaping maintenance districts, special districts, and other special funding or financing tools in conjunction with or as a condition of development, building or permit approval, or anne xation or sphere of influence 1896
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
116
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
amendments when necessary to ensure that new development is fiscally neutral or beneficial.

Policy 3.6 Mix of housing types and sizes. Development is encouraged to provide a mix of housing types, unit sizes, and densities a t the block level. To accomplish this, individual projects five acres or larger may be developed at densities equivalent to one designation higher or lower than the assigned designation, provided that the density across an individual project remains consistent with the General Plan.

Goal 5: A city with housing, employment, and lifestyle opportunities for all ages and incomes of residents.

Policy 5.1: Housing variety in developments. The Clovis General Plan has been planned to provide a variety of housing product types suitable to each stage of a person’s life.

Each development should contribute to a diversity of housing sizes and types within the standards appropriate to the land use designation. This policy does not apply to projects smaller than five acres.

Policy 5.2 Ownership and rental. Encourage a mixture of both ownership and rental options to meet varied preferences and income affordability needs.

Planning Commission Hearing – November 21, 2024
On Thursday November 21, 2024, the Planning Commission considered the Project with staff presenting the Project alongside its recommendations and detailed information as described in the staff report. One individual voiced support for the project, highligh ting its contribution to housing and overall development in the area. No one voiced opposition to the project during the hearing. After discussions, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve the entitlements associated with the Project. All items were approved with a vote of 4- 0-1, with Chair Antuna absent.

Public Notice and Comments
The City published a notice of this public hearing in The Business Journal on Monday, December 2, 2024. A public hearing notice was sent to area residents within 600 feet of the property boundaries for the December 16, 2024, City Council hearing. As of the completion of this staff report, staff has not received any comments from the public.

Review and Comments from Agencies
The Project was distributed to all City divisions as well as outside agencies, including Caltrans, Clovis Unified School District, Fresno Irrigation District, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, AT&T, PG&E, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, State Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the County of Fresno.

Comments received are attached ( Attachment 10) only if the agency has provided concerns, conditions, or mitigation measures. Routine responses and comment letters are placed in the administrative record and provided to the Applicant for their records.

1897
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
117
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Community Facilities District
The fiscal analysis of the Loma Vista Specific Plan identified possible long-term funding shortfalls in Clovis’ Citywide operat ing and maintenance costs. To address this issue the City of Clovis implemented a Community Facilities District. Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) are a means of providing additional funding for the provision of public facilities and services for publ ic safety in newly developing areas of the community where the city would not otherwise be able to afford to continue to provide an adequate level of service as the City continues to grow. The use of CFDs is fairly common among cities in California experi encing high rates of growth, such as Clovis, due to significant losses of local revenue from tax shifts authorized by the State of California and the need to continue to provide an adequate level of service as growth occurs.

A condition of approval has be en added to TM6375 requiring participation of this Project in the CFD.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The City of Clovis has completed an Initial Study (see Attachment 9) assessing the project’s impact on natural and manmade environments, as required by the State of California. Staff is recommending approval of a mitigated negative declaration (“MND”). An MND is a written statement announcing that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment with the implementation of mitigation measures. The complete ISMND can be found on the City’s website at: https://cityofclovis.com/planning-and-development/ceqa.

In summary, environmental impacts were determined to be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures for agricultural resources, biological resources, cultural resources, geological resources, noise, greenhouse gas emissions, and tribal cultural resources. (See the mitigation and monitoring program attached hereto as Attachment 9.) The Notice of Intent to adopt an MND was posted to the City’s website at the web address listed above. (Cal.

Code Regs., Tit. 14, § 15072, subd. (b)(2).) The proposed MND was made available for public comment and review at the City’s Planning and Development Services Department from October 18, 2024, to November 21, 2024. (Cal. Code Regs., Tit. 14, § 15073, subd. (a).)

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
The proposed Project will provide a diversity in housing types, contribute a quality residential product and further advance growth within the Heritage Grove growth area as envisioned by the General Plan. The Project does not substantially impact sewer, water and other public services and will contribute to their proportionate share of infrastructure and open space. The Project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and Development Code and each component of the Project meets the findings that must be considered when making a decision on a project, as outlined in sections above. Staff therefore recommend that the City Council approve resolutions to adopt an MND and mitigation monitoring program in accordance with CEQA, and approve RO310, R2024-005, TM6375, and PDP2024-004, subject to the conditions of approval provided in Attachments 3B and 4A.

1898
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
118
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

Prepared by: Liz Salazar, Assistant Planner

Reviewed by: City Manager JH
1899
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
119
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

TRACT 6375
Residential Land Use Development Standards
Single Family Residential Standard Notes Bronte 3201 Kipling 3202 Hemingway 3203
See Plot Plan on Next Page
Wilde Lots 1 to 188
Designation
Zone District R-1 PRD
GP Density Range Meduim Density and very
low density (8.39 DU/AC) 1 unit per lot
Dwelling Units 188

BUILDING INTENSITY
Minimum Lot Area 2,067
Minimum Lot Width 39'
Minimum Lot Depth 53'
Maximum Coverage 62%
Maximum Height 26'7"
Curved Cul-de-Sac or Corner Lot N/A
Permitted Density
Residential Density 1 Dwelling
Set Backs (Minimum)
Rear Entry: 10' from property line
Side: 0' ft. Non Patio/7ft. Patio Side
Front: 4ft. Min from property line to garage
Garages/Street/Parking 2-car 20x20 min
Street (Interior) 24 ft. min curb-to curb
Parking
Accessory Uses
Walls/Fences 4' min.-7'
Pools and Spas 3' min
Equiptment N/A
Covered Structures 12' High max.

Building Exterior
North Park 0.61 Acre s
South Park 0.55 Acres
Architectural treatment applied to all elevations of a
building. At minimum, all doors, windows and other
wall openings shall be trimmed consistant with
architectural style.

Amenities
Parks will include
concrete walkways,
canopy, park benches,
picnic tables, trash
receptical, and BBQ grill.
258 Spaces
190
190
Plot plan reviewed through RSPR
Attachment 5
2,112
120
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

TRACT 6375
Residential Land Use Development Standards
Single Family Residential Standard Notes Core Series Lots 189 to 216, 312 to 385
219
312
103
4,230
12'
20'
191
121
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

TRACT 6375
Residential Land Use Development Standards
Single Family Residential Standard Notes

3001 Charm 3002 Jewel 3003 Keepsake
Treasures lots 217 to 311
Designation
Zone District R-1 PRD
GP Density Range Meduim Density and very
low density (8.39 DU/AC)
Dwelling Units 154

BUILDING INTENSITY
Minimum Lot Area 3,973
Minimum Lot Width 45
Minimum Lot Depth 94
Maximum Coverage 52%
Maximum Height 18' 11"
Curved Cul-de-Sac or Corner Lot N/A
Permitted Density
Residential Density 1 Dwelling
Set Backs (Minimum)
Front: 12ft. from property line
Side: 5ft. min from property line
Rear:

Garages/Street/Parking 2-car 20'x20' min
Street (Interior) 36 ft. min curb-to curb
Parking Per city standard/Driveway
Accessory Uses
Walls/Fences 4' min.-7'
Pools and Spas 3' min
Equiptment N/A
Building Exterior
North Park 0.61 Acres
South Park 0.55 Acres
Architectural treatment applied to all elevations of a
building. At minimum, all doors, windows and other
wall openings shall be trimmed consistant with
architectural style.

Parks will include
concrete walkways,
canopy, park benches,
picnic tables, trash
receptical, and BBQ grill.

Amenities
14 ft. min from property line
220
311
92 4,230
122
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Attachment 6
123
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Tract 6375
The Wilde Series
at Heritage Grove
A charming community of single-family homes
suitable for every lifestyle.

Attachment 7
124
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Bronte - 3201
The Wilde Series at Heritage Grove
Approx. 1893 sq. ft.

Two Story
3 Bedrooms

2.5 Bathrooms
2-Bay Garage
125
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Bronte
Bronte A Bronte B
126
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Kipling - 3202
The Wilde Series at Heritage Grove
Approx. 2019 sq. ft.

Two Story
3 Bedrooms

2.5 Bathrooms
2-Bay Garage
127
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Kipling
Kipling A Kipling B
128
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Hemingway 3203
The Wilde Series at Heritage Grove
Approx. 2169 sq. ft.

Tow Story
4 Bedrooms

2.5 Bathrooms
2-Bay Garage
129
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Hemingway
Hemingway A Hemingway B
130
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Tract 6375
The Core Series
at Heritage Grove
A charming community of single-family homes
suitable for every lifestyle.
131
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Core
JAMES-M005
The Core Series at Heritage Grove
• Approx. sq. ft. 2066
• Two Story
• 4 Bedrooms
• 3 Bathrooms
• 2-Bay Garage
First FloorSecond Floor
132
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
133
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Core
MUIR - M006
The Core Series at Heritage Grove
• Approx. sq. ft. 2,261
• Two Story
• 5 Bedrooms
• 3 Bathrooms
• 2-Bay Garage
First FloorSecond Floor
134
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
135
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Core
POPPY – M007
The Valencia Series at Heritage Grove
• Approx. sq. ft. 2,623
• Two Story
• 5 Bedrooms
• 3.5 Bathrooms
• 2-Bay Garage
First FloorSecond Floor
136
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
137
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Treasures
at Heritage Grove
A charming community of single-family homes
suitable for every lifestyle.
138
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Approx. 1,341 sq. ft.

Single-story
3 Bedrooms
2 Bathrooms
2-Bay Garage
REEF
The Summer Series Grove
Charm
3001
Treasures at Heritage Grove
139
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Charm A Charm B
Charm
Treasures at [Community Name]
Charm C
140
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Approx. 1,564 sq. ft.

Single-story
3 Bedrooms
2 Bathrooms
2-Bay Garage
REEF
The Summer Series at Gossamer Grove
Jewel
3002
Treasures at Heritage Grove
141
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Jewel A Jewel B
Jewel
Jewel C
142
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Approx. 1,755 sq. ft.

Single-story
4 Bedrooms
2 Bathrooms
2-Bay Garage
REEF
The Summer Series at Gossamer Grove
Keepsake
3003
Treasures at Heritage Grove
143
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Keepsake A Keepsake B
Keepsake
Keepsake C
144
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
TM6375

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
AGR-1 The Project applicant shall prepare or fund an
agricultural resource evaluation prior to project
approval. The resource evaluation shall be use
generally accepted methodologies (such as the
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model) to
identify the potentially significant impact of the loss of agricultural land. If the loss of agricultural land is determined to be a potentially significant impact, the
resource evaluation shall consider the economic
viability of future agricultural use of the property. If the agricultural resource is considered significant
and future agricultural use is considered
economically viable, the conversion will be deemed
significant. The City shall require mitigation by one
of the following methods:
• Mitigation at a 1:1 ration of converted to
preserved acreage through a regional
conservation easement, or payment of its
valuation equivalent if a fee mitigation
program is established. If 1:1 mitigation is
determined to be economically infeasible,
based upon all of the evidence, the ratio may
be reduced to an economically feasible ratio
or no further mitigation shall be required.

This determination shall be made by the
City’s Director of Planning and Development
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
Attachment 8
145
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
Services based upon substantial evidence
in the record; or
• Other potential mitigation which achieves
the same mitigating effect as the measures
identified above, consistent with the CEQA
Statutes and Guidelines. This determination
shall be made by the City’s Director of
Planning and Development Services based
upon substantial evidence in the record.

ARG-2 Prior to issuance of building permits for
development of APN 556 -030-17S, the project
applicant would be required to petition for
cancellation of the Williamson Act contract for APN
556-030-17S. The applicant would have to meet
circumstances and conditions set forth in
Government Code Section 51280. After approval of
the cancellation petition, the applicant would be able
to develop uses that comply with the zoning
designation of the p arcel per the Clovis Municipal
Code.

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
ARG-3 Pursuant to Clovis Municipal Code Section 9.40.170 and the California Civil Code Section 3482.5, prior
to approval of building occupancy permits the
Project developer shall provide residents of the
Project site Right-To-Farm notifications. The Right-
To-Farm notification would advise future occupants
of the Project site that they are residing adjacent to
agricultural land that has been active for three or
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
146
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
more years and that they should expect continued
activities associated with agricultural production.

Biological Resources
BIO-1 Sanford’s arrowhead. Prior to the start of
construction, a qualified biologist will conduct
protocol-level rare plant surveys following California
Department of Fish and Wildlife’s 2018 Protocols for
Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status
Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural
Communities, or most current agency guidance.

Surveys will target all habitats of the Project site that could potentially support the Sanford’s arrowhead,
and will be conducted when local populations of the
Sanford’s arrowhead are in bloom and readily
identifiable.

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

BIO-2 Sanford’s arrowhead. If Sanford’s arrowhead
populations are identified on site, project design will be modified, if at all feasible, to avoid the plants. A qualified biologist will identify an appropriate buffer around the plants, and no developments or other
project-related activities will be permitted within.

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

BIO-3 Sanford’s arrowhead. If it is not feasible to avoid Sanford’s arrowhead populations, the affected
populations will be salvaged in accordance with a
plan prepared by a qualified biologist that will
include contingencies for an unsuccessful salvage
effort. Salvage methods may include seed collection
and dispersal, transplanting rootstock, and/or
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

147
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
topsoil collection and redispersal, as appropriate.

The relocation area(s) will be located in alternative
on-site emergent wetland habitat to be established
and maintained for this species, and protected
through a deed restriction, conservation easement,
or similar mechanism. Relocation areas will be
monitored by a qualified biologist for a period of five years to ensure successful establishment.

BIO-4 Monarch butterfly . Prior to the start of
construction, a qualified biologist will survey all
proposed work areas for milkweed plants. The
survey will be conducted at a time of year when
milkweed is readily identifiable. The objective of the
survey will be to tally and map all milkweed plants
that could potentially be impacted by project
activities (Milkweed Survey).

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

BIO-5 Monarch butterfly. If feasible, any removal of
milkweed plants required for residential buildout will
take place entirely outside of the period in which
monarchs are most likely to breed in the project
vicinity, March 1-August 31 (Construction Timing).

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

BIO-6 Monarch butterfly. If removal of milkweed plants
cannot be avoided between March 1 and August 31,
a qualified biologist will conduct pre -construction
surveys for non -volant life stages of monarchs on
those milkweed plants that will be removed, within
10 days prior to the start of construction. If any non- volant life stages are identified, then those plants
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

148
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
will be avoided until it is confirmed by a qualified
biologist that a monarch is no longer present
(Preconstruction Surveys and Avoidance).

BIO-7 Monarch butterfly. Impacted milkweed plants will
be replaced on site in accordance with a
revegetation plan prepared by a qualified biologist.

A minimum of 50 replacement plantings will be
provided, or three times the number of milkweed
plants identified at the time of the milkweed survey
(see Mitigation Measure BIO -4), whichever is
greater. Replacement plantings must be locally
native; preferred species are narrowleaf milkweed
(A. fascicularis) and showy milkweed (A. speciosa).

The planting site(s) must be in area(s) that will not
be mowed or treated with pesticides or herbicides,
to be guaranteed via a deed restriction or similar
protective mechanism. Revegetation areas will be
monitored by a qualified biologist for a period of five years to ensure success ful establishment.
(Compensatory Mitigation).

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

BIO-8 Swainson’s hawk. If feasible, project activities will take place entirely outside of the Swainson’s hawk
nesting season, defined here as March 1 to
September 15. If Mitigation Measure BIO -8 is
implemented, no further mitigation for this species
is required. (Construction Timing).

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

149
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
BIO-9 Swainson’s hawk. If project activities must occur between March 1 and September 15, a qualified
biologist will conduct nest surveys for Swainson’s
hawks on and within ¼ mile of the Project site within
the survey periods prescribed by Recommended
Timing and Methodology for Swainson’s Hawk
Nesting Surveys in California’s Central Valley
(SHTAC 2000). Three nest surveys will be
conducted in each of two survey periods, with the
survey periods defined as follows: Period I –
January 1 to March 20, Period II – March 20 to April
5, Period III – April 5 to April 20, Period IV – April 21 to June 10, and Period V – June 10 to July 30.

Surveys will take place in the two survey periods
immediately prior to the anticipated start of
construction activities during the nest ing season,
with the exception of Period III, when no surveys
should take place per the SHTAC guidelines. The
surveys will consist of inspecting all accessible,
suitable trees of the survey area for the presence of
nests and hawks. (Nesting Surveys).

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

BIO-10 Swainson’s hawk. If active Swainson’s hawk nests are detected during the surveys or observed
incidentally, a minimum ¼ -mile no -disturbance
buffer will be delineated and maintained around
each nest, to remain in place until the breeding
season has ended or until a qualified biologist has
determined that the birds have fledged and are no
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

150
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
longer reliant upon the nest or parental care for
survival. (No-Disturbance Buffers).

BIO-11 Swainson’s hawk. If an active Swainson’s hawk
nest is detected, and a ¼-mile no-disturbance buffer
is not feasible, the project applicant will consult with CDFW to discuss how to implement the project and
avoid take. If take cannot be avoided, take
authorization will be o btained through the
acquisition of a State Incidental Take Permit (ITP),
pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 2081
subdivision (b). (CDFW Consultation).

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

BIO-12 Other nesting birds and raptors. If feasible,
project activities will take place entirely outside of
the avian nesting season, defined here as February
1 to September 15. If Mitigation Measure BIO-12 is
implemented, no further mitigation for nesting birds
or raptors is required. (Construction Timing).

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

BIO-13 Other nesting birds and raptors. If project
activities must occur between February 1 and
September 15, a qualified biologist will conduct
surveys for active bird nests within 10 days prior to
the start of work during this period. The survey area
will encompass the site and accessible surrounding
lands within 250 feet for nesting birds and 500 feet
for nesting raptors (Preconstruction Surveys).

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

BIO-14 Other nesting birds and raptors. Should any
active nests be discovered in or near the work area,
a qualified biologist will conduct an additional survey City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

151
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
to establish a behavioral baseline of these nests.
(Behavioral Baseline).

BIO-15 Other nesting birds and raptors. If feasible, a qualified biologist will continuously monitor active
nests during project activities to detect behavioral
changes resulting from the project. If behavioral
changes occur, the activities that appear to be
causing the changes (as determined by the qualified
biologist) will be discontinued. At the biologist’s
discretion, activities may be resumed (1) in a
modified form, with lower levels of visual or sound
disturbance, (2) following the implementation of
measures designed to reduce perceived
disturbance, e.g. visual buffers, and/or (3) at a later nesting stage, when the affected birds are less
sensitive to disturbance. (Continuous Monitoring).

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

BIO-16 Other nesting birds and raptors. If continuous
monitoring of active nests is not feasible, or if
nesting birds have behavioral changes that persist
following the implementation of one or more of the
corrective actions identified above under Mitigation
Measure 4.1.4d, a minimum no -disturbance buffer
of 250 feet will be established around active bird
nests and 500 feet around active raptor nests.

These buffers will remain in place until after the
breeding season has ended or until a qualified
biologist has determined that the birds have fledged
and are no longer reliant upon the nest or on -site
parental care for survival. Variance from these no -
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

152
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
disturbance buffers is possible when there is
compelling biological or ecological reason to do so.

A qualified biologist will advise and support any
variance from these buffers. (No -Disturbance
Buffers).

Cultural Resources
CULT-1

If archaeological or tribal resources or materials are
encountered during construction activities, all work
in the immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist, can evaluate
the significance of the find and make
recommendations. Cultural resource materials may
include prehistoric resources such as flaked and
ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone,
ceramics, and fire -affected rock as well as historic
resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or
structural remnants.

If the qualified professional archaeologist
determines that the discovery represents a
potentially significant cultural resource, additional
investigations may be required to mitigate adverse
impacts from project implementation. These
additional studies ma y include avoidance, testing,
and evaluation or data recovery excavation.

153
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if
eligible, total data recovery. The determination shall
be formally documented in writing and submitted to
the Lead Agency as verification that the provisions
for managing unanticipated discoveries have been
met.

CULT-2 If human remains are discovered during
construction or operational activities, further
excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited
pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health
and Safety Code and Project shall follow the
procedures and protocols set for un CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.4(e)(1). If human remains
are identified to be those of Native American,
California Health and Safety Code 7050.5 requires
the County coroner notify the California Native
American Heritage Commission within 24 hours of
discovery. All reports, correspondence, and
determinations regarding the discovery of human
remains on the Project site shall be submitted to the
Lead Agency.

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

Geological Resources
GEO-1
If prehistoric or historic -era cultural materials are
encountered during construction activities, all work
in the immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist and/or
paleontologist, can evaluate the significance of the
find and make recommendations. Cultural resource
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

154
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
materials may include prehistoric resources such as
flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell,
bone, ceramics, and fire -affected rock as well as
historic resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick,
or structural remnants.

If the qualified professional determines that the
discovery represents a potentially significant
cultural resource, additional investigations may be
required to mitigate adverse impacts from project
implementation. These additional studies may
include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or data
recovery excavation.

If a potentially -eligible resource is encountered,
then the qualified professional archaeologist and/or
paleontologist, the Lead Agency, and the project
proponent shall arrange for either 1) total avoidance
of the resource or 2) test excavations to evaluate
eligibility and, if eli gible, total data recovery. The determination shall be formally documented in
writing and submitted to the Lead Agency as
verification that the provisions for managing
unanticipated discoveries have been met.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
GHG-1 In order to meet the 2022 Scoping Plan GHG
requirements, consistent with State GHG reduction
and equity prioritization goals, each residential unit
shall provide electric vehicle charging capabilities
as part of the final project designs.

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

Noise
155
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
NOISE-1 Exterior Noise. A sound wall shall be constructed to a minimum height of six (6) feet above Project-side
grade along North Minnewawa Avenue. In order for
the sound wall to effectively shield noise, where
there will be access to the development from North
Minnewawa Avenue, the sound walls will need to be
turned inward (eastward) for a distance of
approximately twenty (20) feet at roadway access
points. Other Project design features that satisfy the
City’s exterior noise exposure noise level may fulfill
this mitigation.

City of Clovis Planning During
Construction and
Prior to
Occupancy

NOISE-2 Interior Noise. Mechanical ventilation or air
conditioning shall be provided for all homes to
enable windows and doors to remain closed for
sound insulation purposes.

City of Clovis Planning During
Construction and
Prior to
Occupancy

Tribal Cultural Resources
TCR-1
If archaeological or tribal resources or materials are
encountered during construction activities, all work
in the immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist, can evaluate
the significance of the find and make
recommendations. Cultural resource materials may
include prehistoric resources such as flaked and
ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone,
ceramics, and fire -affected rock as well as historic
resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or
structural remnants.

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

156
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
If the qualified professional archaeologist
determines that the discovery represents a
potentially significant cultural resource, additional
investigations may be required to mitigate adverse
impacts from project implementation. These
additional studies ma y include avoidance, testing,
and evaluation or data recovery excavation.

If a potentially -eligible resource is encountered,
then the qualified professional archaeologist, the
Lead Agency, and the project proponent shall
arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the resource
or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if
eligible, total data recovery. The determination shall
be formally documented in writing and submitted to
the Lead Agency as verification that the provisions
for managing unanticipated discoveries have been
met.

TCR-2 If human remains are discovered during
construction or operational activities, further
excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited
pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health
and Safety Code and Project shall follow the
procedures and protocols s et for un CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.4(e)(1). If human remains
are identified to be those of Native American,
California Health and Safety Code 7050.5 requires
the County coroner notify the NAHC within 24 hours
of discovery. All reports, correspondence, and
determinations regarding the discovery of human
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction

157
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
remains on the project site shall be submitted to the
Lead Agency.

158
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE102,185 S.F.112,185 S.F.122,185 S.F. 192,183 S.F.182,183 S.F.
552,184 S.F.542,184 S.F.
592,184 S.F.582,184 S.F.572,184 S.F.562,184 S.F.
1392,184 S.F.1402,184 S.F.1412,184 S.F.1422,184 S.F.1432,184 S.F. 1512,464 S.F.
1532,184 S.F.1542,184 S.F.1552,184 S.F.
1632,184 S.F.1642,184 S.F.1652,184 S.F.
1732,184 S.F.1742,184 S.F.1752,184 S.F.
82,614 S.F.
72,234 S.F.62,234 S.F.
42,234 S.F.32,234 S.F.
52,234 S.F.
22,234 S.F.
12,514 S.F.
92,744 S.F.202,744 S.F.
172,183 S.F.
312,184 S.F.302,184 S.F.222,184 S.F.232,184 S.F.242,184 S.F. 212,744 S.F.322,744 S.F.
432,184 S.F.422,184 S.F.
362,184 S.F.
342,184 S.F.352,184 S.F.
332,744 S.F.442,744 S.F.602,630 S.F.
522,458 S.F.
452,630 S.F.
462,184 S.F.472,184 S.F.482,184 S.F.492,184 S.F.502,184 S.F.512,184 S.F. 532,458 S.F.
1502,184 S.F.1492,184 S.F.1482,184 S.F.1472,184 S.F.1462,184 S.F. 1442,355 S.F.
1382,464 S.F.
1452,355 S.F.
1602,184 S.F.1592,184 S.F.1582,184 S.F.
1572,744 S.F.1562,744 S.F.1672,744 S.F.
1702,184 S.F.1692,184 S.F.1682,184 S.F.
1662,744 S.F.
1802,184 S.F.1792,184 S.F.1782,184 S.F.
1772,744 S.F.1762,744 S.F.1882,328 S.F.1872,223 S.F.1862,195 S.F.1852,167 S.F.1842,140 S.F.1832,112 S.F.1822,356 S.F. 292,184 S.F.412,184 S.F.
132,185 S.F.162,183 S.F.
142,620 S.F.152,620 S.F.252,184 S.F.282,184 S.F.
272,620 S.F.262,620 S.F.372,184 S.F.402,184 S.F.
392,620 S.F.382,620 S.F.
1812,620 S.F.1722,620 S.F.1622,620 S.F.1712,620 S.F.1522,620 S.F.1612,620 S.F.

OUTLOT A64,314 S.F.

OUTLOT B57,347 S.F.

BLOOM AVENUE

VINTAGE AVENUE

HEIRLOOM LANE
PROJECT TITLESHEET DESCRIPTIONY&H No.Dr. By:Ch. By:Date:Sheet No.of SheetsPlot By: Alec Sandoval Plot Date: 10/14/2024 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 2.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COMPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTSERVICES DEPARTMENTProject No.CITY OF CLOVISAPPROVALSREVISIONSAPPROVEDDATEAPPROVED(INITIALS)CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTFEE ADMINISTRATIONDEVELOPMENT REVIEWSTREETSPARKSSOLID WASTEUTILITIESCR26 TRACT NO. 6375MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERDMULTI-FAMILYBB8/8/202321-156 SEE SHEET 4
SEE SHEET 3
LEGEND
Attachment 9
Fire Hydrant Markings

Page 1 of 4 ends

159
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
552,184 S.F.542,184 S.F.
592,184 S.F.582,184 S.F.572,184 S.F.562,184 S.F.
622,184 S.F.632,184 S.F.642,184 S.F.762,184 S.F.
742,184 S.F.752,184 S.F.
1392,184 S.F.1402,184 S.F.1412,184 S.F.1422,184 S.F.1432,184 S.F. 1512,464 S.F.
602,630 S.F.
522,458 S.F.
452,630 S.F.
462,184 S.F.472,184 S.F.482,184 S.F.492,184 S.F.502,184 S.F.512,184 S.F. 532,458 S.F.
712,184 S.F.702,184 S.F.692,184 S.F.
612,744 S.F.722,744 S.F.
812,184 S.F.822,184 S.F.832,184 S.F.732,744 S.F.842,744 S.F. 952,184 S.F.942,184 S.F.932,184 S.F.
862,184 S.F.872,184 S.F.882,184 S.F.
852,744 S.F.962,744 S.F.
1092,184 S.F.1102,184 S.F.1112,184 S.F.
1162,184 S.F.1152,184 S.F.1142,184 S.F.
1132,744 S.F.1122,744 S.F.
1202,184 S.F.1212,184 S.F.
1192,184 S.F.1262,184 S.F.1252,184 S.F.1242,184 S.F.
1232,744 S.F.1222,744 S.F.
1302,184 S.F.1312,184 S.F.
1292,184 S.F.
1352,184 S.F.1342,184 S.F.
1332,744 S.F.
1362,184 S.F.
1322,744 S.F.
1502,184 S.F.1492,184 S.F.1482,184 S.F.1472,184 S.F.1462,184 S.F. 1442,355 S.F.
1382,464 S.F.
1452,355 S.F.

OUTLOT F24,868 S.F.
992,204 S.F.1002,204 S.F.
972,480 S.F.982,204 S.F.
1012,204 S.F.1022,778 S.F.
652,184 S.F.682,184 S.F.
672,620 S.F.662,620 S.F.802,184 S.F.772,184 S.F.
782,620 S.F.792,620 S.F.922,184 S.F.892,184 S.F.
902,620 S.F.912,620 S.F.

OUTLOT E21,769 S.F.
1032,769 S.F.
1072,492 S.F.
1062,204 S.F.1052,204 S.F.1042,204 S.F. 1372,620 S.F.1282,620 S.F.1182,620 S.F.1272,620 S.F.1172,620 S.F.1082,620 S.F.

OUTLOT C64,313 S.F.

OUTLOT D57,329 S.F.

HEIRLOOM LANE

BLOOM AVENUE

VINTAGE LANE

NORTH DEWITT AVENUE
PROJECT TITLESHEET DESCRIPTIONY&H No.Dr. By:Ch. By:Date:Sheet No.of SheetsPlot By: Alec Sandoval Plot Date: 10/14/2024 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 3.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COMPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTSERVICES DEPARTMENTProject No.CITY OF CLOVISAPPROVALSREVISIONSAPPROVEDDATEAPPROVED(INITIALS)CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTFEE ADMINISTRATIONDEVELOPMENT REVIEWSTREETSPARKSSOLID WASTEUTILITIESCR36 TRACT NO. 6375MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERDMULTI-FAMILYBB8/8/202321-156 SEE SHEET 4
SEE SHEET 5
SEE SHEET 2
LEGEND
Fire Hydrant Markings

Page 2 of 4 ends

160
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

SUMMERSET AVENUE

NORTH DEWITT AVENUE

NORTH PERRY AVENUE

NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE

SUMMERSET AVENUENORTH OXFORD AVENUEWINDMILLAVENUE

NORTH HARVARD AVENUE

NORTH DARTMOUTH AVENUEWINDMILLAVENUE

NORTH CHERRY LANE
2221 23 552,184 S.F.542,184 S.F.
562,184 S.F.
1954,230 S.F.1964,230 S.F.1894,198 S.F.1974,230 S.F.1904,230 S.F.1984,712 S.F.1914,230 S.F.1994,700 S.F.1924,230 S.F.2004,700 S.F.1934,230 S.F.2014,700 S.F.1944,230 S.F. 2154,500 S.F.2144,500 S.F.2134,500 S.F.2124,500 S.F.2114,500 S.F.2104,500 S.F.2094,500 S.F. 2165,494 S.F.
2089,891 S.F.
2194,500 S.F.2204,500 S.F.2214,500 S.F.2224,500 S.F.2234,500 S.F. 2175,500 S.F.2184,500 S.F.
2064,700 S.F.2079,510 S.F.2034,705 S.F.2044,700 S.F.2054,700 S.F.2284,230 S.F.2294,230 S.F.2304,230 S.F.2314,230 S.F.2324,230 S.F.2334,230 S.F.2344,230 S.F. 2764,230 S.F.2754,230 S.F.2744,230 S.F.2734,230 S.F.2724,230 S.F.2774,595 S.F. 2924,500 S.F.2914,500 S.F.2904,500 S.F.2894,500 S.F.2884,500 S.F.2874,500 S.F.2865,277 S.F. 2934,894 S.F.3074,500 S.F.2944,500 S.F.3064,500 S.F.2954,500 S.F.3054,500 S.F.2964,500 S.F.3044,500 S.F.2974,500 S.F.3034,500 S.F.2984,500 S.F.3024,500 S.F.2994,500 S.F.3015,278 S.F.3005,278 S.F. 3194,700 S.F.3184,886 S.F.3134,230 S.F.3084,595 S.F.3094,230 S.F.3104,230 S.F.3114,230 S.F.3124,230 S.F.3164,230 S.F.3144,230 S.F.3154,230 S.F.3209,979 S.F. 3254,500 S.F.3264,500 S.F.3274,500 S.F.3284,500 S.F.
3219,858 S.F.
3224,500 S.F.3234,500 S.F.3244,500 S.F.
3295,493 S.F.
3514,500 S.F.3504,500 S.F.3494,500 S.F.3484,500 S.F.3474,500 S.F. 3534,500 S.F.3524,500 S.F.
3465,447 S.F.
3549,867 S.F.3594,700 S.F.3584,700 S.F.3574,700 S.F.3564,700 S.F.35510,067 S.F.3609,979 S.F. 3654,500 S.F.3664,500 S.F.3674,500 S.F.3684,500 S.F.
3619,876 S.F.
3624,500 S.F.3634,498 S.F.3644,500 S.F.
3695,458 S.F.
3364,500 S.F.3394,500 S.F.3354,500 S.F.3404,500 S.F.3344,500 S.F.3414,500 S.F.3334,500 S.F.3424,500 S.F.3324,500 S.F.3434,500 S.F.3314,500 S.F.3444,500 S.F.3305,281 S.F.3455,282 S.F. 3384,892 S.F.3374,893 S.F. 3764,500 S.F.3754,500 S.F.3744,500 S.F.3734,500 S.F.3724,500 S.F.3714,500 S.F. 3814,500 S.F.
3834,500 S.F.
3794,500 S.F.3804,500 S.F.
3775,285 S.F.3785,284 S.F.
3854,893 S.F.3704,892 S.F.3844,500 S.F.
3824,500 S.F.

OUTLOT G9,788 S.F.
3174,230 S.F.
42,234 S.F.32,234 S.F.22,234 S.F.12,514 S.F.522,458 S.F. 492,184 S.F.502,184 S.F.512,184 S.F.532,458 S.F.
132,185 S.F.162,183 S.F.142,620 S.F.152,620 S.F.252,184 S.F.282,184 S.F.272,620 S.F.262,620 S.F.372,184 S.F.402,184 S.F.392,620 S.F.382,620 S.F.992,204 S.F.100 972,480 S.F.982,204 S.F. 652,184 S.F.682,184 S.F.672,620 S.F.662,620 S.F.802,184 S.F.772,184 S.F.782,620 S.F.792,620 S.F.922,184 S.F.892,184 S.F.902,620 S.F.912,620 S.F. 2274,230 S.F.
2244,500 S.F.
22610,067 S.F.2259,863 S.F.

OUTLOT A64,314 S.F.OUTLOT C64,313 S.F.
2024,700 S.F.

SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3HEIRLOOM LANEHEIRLOOM LANE
SEE SHEET 5
PROJECT TITLESHEET DESCRIPTIONY&H No.Dr. By:Ch. By:Date:Sheet No.of SheetsPlot By: Alec Sandoval Plot Date: 10/14/2024 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 4.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COMPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTSERVICES DEPARTMENTProject No.CITY OF CLOVISAPPROVALSREVISIONSAPPROVEDDATEAPPROVED(INITIALS)CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTFEE ADMINISTRATIONDEVELOPMENT REVIEWSTREETSPARKSSOLID WASTEUTILITIESCR46 TRACT NO. 6375MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERDRESIDENTIALBB8/8/202321-156 LEGEND
Fire Hydrant Markings

Page 3 of 4 ends

161
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

SUMMERSET AVENUE

NORTH DEWITT AVENUE

NORTH WALKER AVENUE

NORTH PERRY AVENUEWINDMILLAVENUE

NORTH RALPH AVENUECLOVIS AVENUE

WINDMILLAVENUE
2221201918171615141312111098 23
REMAINDER5,031 S.F.OUTLOT J53,420 S.F.
2194,500 S.F.2204,500 S.F.2214,500 S.F.2224,500 S.F.2234,500 S.F. 2175,500 S.F.2184,500 S.F.
2284,230 S.F.2294,230 S.F.2304,230 S.F.2314,230 S.F.2324,230 S.F.2334,230 S.F.2344,230 S.F.2354,230 S.F. 2496,091 S.F.2404,500 S.F.
2445,495 S.F.2455,492 S.F.2434,500 S.F.2464,500 S.F.2424,500 S.F.2474,500 S.F.2414,500 S.F.2484,566 S.F. 2384,500 S.F.2509,448 S.F.
2375,724 S.F.
2394,500 S.F.2517,501 S.F.
2534,500 S.F.2545,483 S.F.2556,944 S.F.
25613,360 S.F.2524,500 S.F.OUTLOT I
2654,230 S.F. 2764,230 S.F.2754,230 S.F.2744,230 S.F.2734,230 S.F.2724,230 S.F.2714,230 S.F.2704,230 S.F.2694,230 S.F.2684,230 S.F.2674,230 S.F.2664,230 S.F.2594,230 S.F.2644,230 S.F.2634,230 S.F.2624,230 S.F.2614,230 S.F.2604,230 S.F.25717,087 S.F. 2774,595 S.F.2585,592 S.F. 2924,500 S.F.2914,500 S.F.2904,500 S.F.2894,500 S.F.2884,500 S.F.2874,500 S.F.2865,277 S.F. 2934,894 S.F.
2844,500 S.F.
2784,893 S.F.2794,500 S.F.2804,500 S.F.2814,500 S.F.2824,500 S.F.2834,500 S.F. 2855,277 S.F.
3074,500 S.F.2944,500 S.F.3064,500 S.F.2954,500 S.F.3054,500 S.F.2964,500 S.F.3044,500 S.F.2974,500 S.F.3034,500 S.F.2984,500 S.F.3024,500 S.F.2994,500 S.F.3015,278 S.F.3005,278 S.F. 3084,595 S.F.3094,230 S.F.3104,230 S.F.3114,230 S.F.

OUTLOT G9,788 S.F.
992,204 S.F.100
972,480 S.F.982,204 S.F.
922,184 S.F.912,620 S.F.
2363,973 S.F.OUTLOT H2274,230 S.F.
2244,500 S.F.
22610,067 S.F.2259,863 S.F.
387223,441 S.F.
38617,281 S.F.

BARON AVENUE

CLOVISAVENUE

NORTH DEWITT AVENUE
PROJECT TITLESHEET DESCRIPTIONY&H No.Dr. By:Ch. By:Date:Sheet No.of SheetsPlot By: Alec Sandoval Plot Date: 10/14/2024 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 5.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COMPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTSERVICES DEPARTMENTProject No.CITY OF CLOVISAPPROVALSREVISIONSAPPROVEDDATEAPPROVED(INITIALS)CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTFEE ADMINISTRATIONDEVELOPMENT REVIEWSTREETSPARKSSOLID WASTEUTILITIESCR56 TRACT NO. 6375MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERDRESIDENTIALBB8/8/202321-156 SEE SHEET 3
SEE SHEET 2
Fire Hydrant Markings

Page 4 of 4 ends

162
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
163
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
164
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
165
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
166
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
167
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
168
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
169
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
170
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
171
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
172
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
173
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
174
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
175
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
176
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
177
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
178
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

County of Fresno

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Environmental Health Division
Promotion, preservation and protection of the community’s health 1221 Fulton Street /P. O. Box 11867, Fresno, CA 93775
(559) 600-3357 FAX (559) 455-4646
The County of Fresno is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer www.co.fresno.ca.us www.fcdph.org
September 24, 2024
LU0021631
2604
Liz Salazar, Assistant Planner
City of Clovis
Planning and Development Services Department
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612
Dear Ms. Salazar:

PROJECT NUMBER: RO310, R2024-005, PDP2024-001, TM6375
RO310; a resolution of application for the annexation of approximately 193.02 acres into the City of Clovis. R2024-005; A request to prezone approximately 193.02 acres from Fresno County AE-20 to Clovis R-1 and R-1-MD Zone Districts. PDP2024-001; A planned development permit request for a 387-lot single-family planned residential development for land located north of Shepherd Avenue, between Minnewawa and Clovis Avenues. TM6375; A request to approve a vesting tentative tract map for a 387-lot single-family planned residential development.

APN: Multiple ZONING: AE-20 to R-1-PRD ADDRESS: N. of Shepherd btw Minnewawa & Clovis Avenues
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
 Construction permits for development should be subject to assurance of sewer capacity of the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. Concurrence should be obtained from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). For more information, contact staff at (559) 445-5116.
 Construction permits for the development should be subject to assurance that the City of Clovis community water system has the capacity and quality to serve this project. Concurrence should be obtained from the State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water-Southern Branch. For more information call (559) 447-3300.
 The proposed project has the potential to expose nearby residents to elevated noise levels.

Consideration should be given to the Fresno County Ordinance Code the City’s municipal code.  As a measure to protect ground water, all water wells and/or septic systems that exist or have been abandoned within the project area should be properly destroyed by an appropriately licensed contractor.
 Should any underground storage tank(s) be found during the project, the applicant shall apply for and secure an Underground Storage Tank Removal Permit from the Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Division. Contact the Fresno County Hazmat Compliance Program at (559) 600-3271 for more information.
179
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Liz Salazar
RO310, R2024-005, PDP2024-001, TM6375
September 24, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

2 The following comments pertain to the demolition of any existing structure(s):
 Should the structure(s) have an active rodent or insect infestation, the infestation should be abated prior to demolition of the structure(s) in order to prevent the spread of vectors to adjacent properties.
 In the process of demolishing the existing structure(s), the contractor may encounter asbestos containing construction materials and materials coated with lead-based paints.  If asbestos containing materials are encountered, contact the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District at (559) 230-6000 for more information.  If the structure(s) were constructed prior to 1979 or if lead-based paint is suspected to have been used in these structures, then prior to demolition work the contractor should contact the following agencies for current regulations and requirements:
 California Department of Public Health, Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch, at (510) 620-5600.
 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, at (415) 947-8000.  State of California, Industrial Relations Department, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, Consultation Service (CAL-OSHA) at (559) 454-5302.

REVIEWED BY:

Kevin Tsuda, R.E.H.S.

Environmental Health Specialist II (559) 600-33271
KT
cc: Deep Sidhu- Environmental Health Division (CT. 55.25) Jeff Callaway- Applicant ([email protected])
180
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND CAPITAL PROJECTS DIVISION
2220 Tulare Street, Sixth Floor / Fresno, California 93721 / Phone (559) 600-4497 / 600-4022 / 600-4545 / FAX 600-4200 The County of Fresno is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING
STEVEN E. WHITE, DIRECTOR

October 8, 2024

Liz Salazar, Assistant Planner
City of Clovis Planning and Development Services
1033 Fifth Street Clovis, CA 93612

SUBJECT: City of Clovis TM6375, R2024-005, PDP2024-001, and RO310- 387-lot single- family planned residential development.

Dear Ms. Salazar,

The County of Fresno appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the subject project being reviewed by the City of Clovis. The proposed 387-lot single-family planned residential development on land north of Shepherd Avenue, between Minnewawa and Clovis Avenues.

The documents received for this review were circulated to our various Fresno County Public Works and Planning divisions. See comments below.

Fresno County Policy Planning:

Williamson Act:

Parcel identified as APN 556-030-17S and APN 556-040-05s on the Assessor's map is considered one legal parcel and is 17.81-acres in size. A notice of contract non-renewal was recorded on a 5.30-acre portion of the 17.81-acre parcel known as APN 556-040-05S on July 16, 2007, and the contract on that portion the parcel expired in in 2017 (Document Number 07- 0136149.) The balance of the 17.81-acre parcel known as APN 556-030-17S and is 12.51 acres, is currently enrolled in the Williamson Act Program under Contract No. AP 4826.

A Notice of Nonrenewal was recorded on the 12.51-acre balance on April 29, 2022, as Document No. 22-0056293 and the contract on the 12.51-acres will expire on the last day of December 2031 Prior to any development on this 12.51 acres known as APN 556-030-17S, the contract nonrenewal must either expire which is the last day of December 2031, or a Cancellation Petition must be filed, processed, and approved by the governing body having jurisdiction over the subject parcel.

The subject parcel will be removed from the Williamson Act program if the governing body approves the cancellation petition, and a Certificate of Cancellation is approved and recorded at the Fresno County Recorder's Office.

Fresno County Transportation Planning:

This project will impact county facilities and should require a TIS, please include the county in all future routings best point of contact is [email protected]. Using ITE trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) trips are calculated to be over the county's threshold.

County of Fresno
181
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

City of Clovis

Page 2 ends

2 The county would Like the request the following intersections be included in the traffic impact study:

• The intersection of Behymer Avenue and Minnewawa Avenue • Behymer Avenue, from Peach Avenue to Minnewawa Avenue • The newly constructed segment of Peach Avenue adjacent to the subject site • The segment of Minnewawa Avenue adjacent to the subject site

The entire right-of-way of the following street segments and intersection should be incorporated into the City of Clovis as part of the annexation process:

• The intersection of Behymer Avenue and Minnewawa Avenue • Behymer Avenue, adjacent to the annexation area
• Shepherd Avenue from Peach Avenue to the east boundary of the annexation area

Fresno County Road Maintenance and Operations Division:

Pending receipt of Road Maintenance and Operations comment.

Minnewawa Avenue is a county-maintained road classified as a collector road with an existing 60’ total road right-of-way, 30’ east of section line fronting the subject parcel. Ultimate right-of- way is 84’ per the Fresno County General Plan. Minnewawa Ave has a total pavement width of

32.2’, an AADT of 5600 VPD, and a PCI of 100. Roadway is in good condition.

Mason is not a county-maintained road, but it does have a 20’ right-of-way for a distance east of Minnewawa.

RMO Comments:

1) City of Clovis should be required to annex the full road right-of-way of Minnewawa Ave and any roads along parcel frontage.
2) Road Maintenance and Operations requests to be included in any traffic impact studies performed as part of this project.
3) The right of way along Mason should be vacated if not annexed or not used for road purposes.

Sincerely,

Arianna Brown
Arianna Brown, Planner -- Development Services and Capital Projects Division

G:\4360Devs&Pln\PROJSEC\PROJDOCS\Environmental\OAR\City of Clovis\RO310, R2024-005, PDP 2024-001, and TM 6375\RO310, R2024-005, PDP 2024-001 and TM 6375City of Clovis- RESPONSE LETTER.docx 182
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

October 8, 2024

Liz Salazar
City of Clovis
Planning and Development Services
1033 Fifth St
Clovis, CA 93612

Project: Planning Application for RO310, R2024-005, TM6375, PDP2024-001

District CEQA Reference No: 20241058

Dear Ms. Salazar

The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the Planning Application (PA) from the City of Clovis (City) for the projects listed above. Per the PA, the project consists of the development of 387 single-family residential lots and the annexation of 193.02 acres into the City of Clovis (Project). The Project is located north of Shepherd Ave between Minnewawa Ave and Clovis Ave, in Clovis, CA.

The District offers the following comments at this time regarding the Project:

Project Related Emissions

At the federal level under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), the District is designated as extreme nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone standards and serious nonattainment for the particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size (PM2.5) standards. At the state level under California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), the District is designated as nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 standards.

The District’s initial review of the Project concludes that emissions resulting from construction and/or operation of the Project may exceed any of the following significance thresholds as identified in the District’s Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts: https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/g4nl3p0g/gamaqi.pdf.

The District recommends that a more detailed preliminary review of the Project be conducted for the Project’s construction and operational emissions.

183
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 2 of 9 District Reference No: 20241058
October 8, 2024

Construction Emissions

The District recommends, to reduce impacts from construction-related diesel exhaust emissions, the Project should utilize the cleanest available off-road construction equipment.

Operational Emissions

Operational (ongoing) air emissions from mobile sources and stationary sources should be analyzed separately. For reference, the District’s significance thresholds are identified in the District’s Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/g4nl3p0g/gamaqi.pdf.

Recommended Mitigation Measure: At a minimum, project related impacts on air quality should be reduced to levels below the District’s significance thresholds through incorporation of design elements such as the use of cleaner Heavy Heavy-Duty (HHD) trucks and vehicles, measures that reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMTs), and measures that increase energy efficiency. More information on transportation mitigation measures can be found at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/ob0pweru/clean-air-measures.pdf

Recommended Model for Quantifying Air Emissions

Project-related criteria pollutant emissions from construction and operational sources should be identified and quantified. Emissions analysis should be performed using the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod), which uses the most recent CARB-approved version of relevant emissions models and emission factors. CalEEMod is available to the public and can be downloaded from the CalEEMod website at: www.caleemod.com.

Health Risk Screening/Assessment

The City should evaluate the risk associated with the Project for sensitive receptors (residences, businesses, hospitals, day-care facilities, health care facilities, etc.) in the area and mitigate any potentially significant risk to help limit exposure of sensitive receptors to emissions.

To determine potential health impacts on surrounding receptors (residences, businesses, hospitals, day-care facilities, health care facilities, etc.) a Prioritization and/or a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be performed for the Project. These health risk determinations should quantify and characterize potential Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) identified by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment/California Air Resources Board (OEHHA/CARB) that pose a present or potential hazard to human health.
184
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 3 of 9 District Reference No: 20241058
October 8, 2024

Health risk analyses should include all potential air emissions from the project, which include emissions from construction of the project, including multi-year construction, as well as ongoing operational activities of the project. Note, two common sources of TACs can be attributed to diesel exhaust emitted from heavy-duty off-road earth moving equipment during construction, and from ongoing operation of heavy-duty on-road trucks.

Prioritization (Screening Health Risk Assessment):

A “Prioritization” is the recommended method for a conservative screening-level health risk assessment. The Prioritization should be performed using the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s (CAPCOA) methodology. Please contact the District for assistance with performing a Prioritization analysis.

The District recommends that a more refined analysis, in the form of an HRA, be performed for any project resulting in a Prioritization score of 10 or greater. This is because the prioritization results are a conservative health risk representation, while the detailed HRA provides a more accurate health risk evaluation.

Health Risk Assessment:

Prior to performing an HRA, it is strongly recommended that land use agencies/ project proponents develop and submit for District review a health risk modeling protocol that outlines the sources and methodologies that will be used to perform the HRA.

A development project would be considered to have a potentially significant health risk if the HRA demonstrates that the health impacts would exceed the District’s established risk thresholds, which can be found here:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/ceqa/.

A project with a significant health risk would trigger all feasible mitigation measures.

The District strongly recommends that development projects that result in a significant health risk not be approved by the land use agency.

The District is available to review HRA protocols and analyses. For HRA submittals please provide the following information electronically to the District for review:

• HRA (AERMOD) modeling files
• HARP2 files
• Summary of emissions source locations, emissions rates, and emission factor calculations and methodologies.

185
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 4 of 9 District Reference No: 20241058
October 8, 2024

For assistance, please contact the District’s Technical Services Department by:

• E-Mailing inquiries to: [email protected]
• Calling (559) 230-5900

Recommended Measure: Development projects resulting in TAC emissions should be located an adequate distance from residential areas and other sensitive receptors to prevent the creation of a significant health risk in accordance to CARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective located at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/resource-center/strategy- development/land-use-resources.

Ambient Air Quality Analysis

An Ambient Air Quality Analysis (AAQA) uses air dispersion modeling to determine if emissions increases from a project will cause or contribute to a violation of State or National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The District recommends an AAQA be performed for the Project if emissions exceed 100 pounds per day of any pollutant.

An AAQA uses air dispersion modeling to determine if emission increase from a project will cause or contribute to a violation of State or National Ambien Air Quality Standards. An acceptable analysis would include emissions from both project- specific permitted and non-permitted equipment and activities. The District recommends consultation with District staff to determine the appropriate model and input data to use in the analysis.

Specific information for assessing significance, including screening tools and modeling guidance, is available online at the District’s website:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/ceqa/.

Voluntary Emission Reduction Agreement

Criteria pollutant emissions may result in emissions exceeding the District’s significance thresholds, potentially resulting in a significant impact on air quality.

When a project is expected to have a significant impact, the District recommends the environmental review also include a discussion on the feasibility of implementing a Voluntary Emission Reduction Agreement (VERA) for this Project.

A VERA is a mitigation measure by which the project proponent provides pound-for- pound mitigation of emissions increases through a process that develops, funds, and implements emission reduction projects, with the District serving a role of administrator of the emissions reduction projects and verifier of the successful mitigation effort. To implement a VERA, the project proponent and the District enter into a contractual agreement in which the project proponent agrees to mitigate project specific emissions by providing funds for the District’s incentives programs. 186
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 5 of 9 District Reference No: 20241058
October 8, 2024

The funds are disbursed by the District in the form of grants for projects that achieve emission reductions. Thus, project-related impacts on air quality can be mitigated.

Types of emission reduction projects that have been funded in the past include electrification of stationary internal combustion engines (such as agricultural irrigation pumps), replacing old heavy-duty trucks with new, cleaner, more efficient heavy-duty trucks, and replacement of agricultural equipment with the latest generation technologies.

In implementing a VERA, the District verifies the actual emission reductions that have been achieved as a result of completed grant contracts, monitors the emission reduction projects, and ensures the enforceability of achieved reductions. After the project is mitigated, the District certifies to the Lead Agency that the mitigation is completed, providing the Lead Agency with an enforceable mitigation measure demonstrating that project-related emissions have been mitigated. To assist the Lead Agency and project proponent in ensuring that the environmental document is compliant with CEQA, the District recommends the environmental document includes an assessment of the feasibility of implementing a VERA.

Vegetative Barriers and Urban Greening

There are residential units located near the Project. The District suggests the City consider the feasibility of incorporating vegetative barriers and urban greening as a measure to further reduce air pollution exposure on sensitive receptors (e.g., residential units).

While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, vegetative barriers have been shown to be an additional measure to potentially reduce a population’s exposure to air pollution through the interception of airborne particles and the update of gaseous pollutants. Examples of vegetative barriers include, but are not limited to the following: trees, bushes, shrubs, or a mix of these. Generally, a higher and thicker vegetative barrier with full coverage will result in greater reductions in downwind pollutant concentrations. In the same manner, urban greening is also a way to help improve air quality and public health in addition to enhancing the overall beautification of a community with drought tolerant, low-maintenance greenery.

Clean Lawn and Garden Equipment in the Community

Since the Project consists of residential development, gas-powered residential lawn and garden equipment have the potential to result in an increase of NOx and PM2.5 emissions. Utilizing electric lawn care equipment can provide residents with immediate economic, environmental, and health benefits. The District recommends the Project proponent consider the District’s Clean Green Yard Machines (CGYM) program which provides incentive funding for replacement of existing gas powered lawn and garden equipment. More information on the District CGYM program and 187
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 6 of 9 District Reference No: 20241058
October 8, 2024

funding can be found at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/grants/clean-green-yard- machines-residential/

On-Site Solar Deployment

It is the policy of the State of California that renewable energy resources and zero- carbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers by December 31, 2045. While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, the production of solar energy is contributing to improving air quality and public health. The District suggests that the City consider incorporating solar power systems as an emission reduction strategy for the Project.

District Rules and Regulations

The District issues permits for many types of air pollution sources, and regulates some activities that do not require permits. A project subject to District rules and regulations would reduce its impacts on air quality through compliance with the District’s regulatory framework. In general, a regulation is a collection of individual rules, each of which deals with a specific topic. As an example, Regulation II (Permits) includes District Rule 2010 (Permits Required), Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review), Rule 2520 (Federally Mandated Operating Permits), and several other rules pertaining to District permitting requirements and processes.

The list of rules below is neither exhaustive nor exclusive. Current District rules can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/rules-and-planning/current-district-rules- and-regulations. To identify other District rules or regulations that apply to future projects, or to obtain information about District permit requirements, the project proponents are strongly encouraged to contact the District’s Small Business Assistance (SBA) Office at (559) 230-5888.

District Rules 2010 and 2201 - Air Quality Permitting for Stationary Sources

Stationary Source emissions include any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit any affected pollutant directly or as a fugitive emission. District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) requires operators of emission sources to obtain an Authority to Construct (ATC) and Permit to Operate (PTO) from the District. District Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) requires that new and modified stationary sources of emissions mitigate their emissions using Best Available Control Technology (BACT).

188
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 7 of 9 District Reference No: 20241058
October 8, 2024

This Project may be subject to District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) and Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) and may require District permits. Prior to construction, the Project proponent should submit to the District an application for an ATC. For further information or assistance, the project proponent may contact the District’s SBA Office at (559) 230-5888.

District Rule 9510 - Indirect Source Review (ISR)

The Project is subject to District Rule 9510 because it will receive a project- level discretionary approval from a public agency and will equal or exceed 50 residential units.

The purpose of District Rule 9510 is to reduce the growth in both NOx and PM emissions associated with development and transportation projects from mobile and area sources; specifically, the emissions associated with the construction and subsequent operation of development projects. The ISR Rule requires developers to mitigate their NOx and PM emissions by incorporating clean air design elements into their projects. Should the proposed development project clean air design elements be insufficient to meet the required emission reductions, developers must pay a fee that ultimately funds incentive projects to achieve off-site emissions reductions.

Per Section 5.0 of the ISR Rule, an Air Impact Assessment (AIA) application is required to be submitted no later than applying for project-level approval from a public agency. As of the date of this letter, the District has not received an AIA application for this Project. Please inform the project proponent to immediately submit an AIA application to the District to comply with District Rule 9510 so that proper mitigation and clean air design under ISR can be incorporated into the Project’s design. One AIA application should be submitted for the entire Project.

Information about how to comply with District Rule 9510 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview

The AIA application form can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview/forms- and-applications/

District staff is available to provide assistance and can be reached by phone at (559) 230-5900 or by email at [email protected].

189
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 8 of 9 District Reference No: 20241058
October 8, 2024

District Rule 4002 (National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants)

In the event an existing building will be renovated, partially demolished or removed, the Project may be subject to District Rule 4002. This rule requires a thorough inspection for asbestos to be conducted before any regulated facility is demolished or renovated. Information on how to comply with District Rule 4002 can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/compliance/demolition- renovation/

District Rule 4601 (Architectural Coatings)

The Project may be subject to District Rule 4601 since it is expected to utilize architectural coatings. Architectural coatings are paints, varnishes, sealers, or stains that are applied to structures, portable buildings, pavements or curbs.

The purpose of this rule is to limit VOC emissions from architectural coatings.

In addition, this rule specifies architectural coatings storage, cleanup and labeling requirements. Additional information on how to comply with District Rule 4601 requirements can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/tkgjeusd/rule-4601.pdf

District Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions)

The project proponent may be required to submit a Construction Notification Form or submit and receive approval of a Dust Control Plan prior to commencing any earthmoving activities as described in Regulation VIII, specifically Rule 8021 – Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities.

Should the project result in at least 1-acre in size, the project proponent shall provide written notification to the District at least 48 hours prior to the project proponents intent to commence any earthmoving activities pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). Also, should the project result in the disturbance of 5- acres or more, or will include moving, depositing, or relocating more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials, the project proponent shall submit to the District a Dust Control Plan pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). For additional information regarding the written notification or Dust Control Plan requirements, please contact District Compliance staff at (559) 230-5950.

The application for both the Construction Notification and Dust Control Plan can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/fm3jrbsq/dcp-form.docx

190
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 9 of 9 District Reference No: 20241058
October 8, 2024

Information about District Regulation VIII can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/dustcontrol

District Rule 4901 - Wood Burning Fireplaces and Heaters

The purpose of this rule is to limit emissions of carbon monoxide and particulate matter from wood burning fireplaces, wood burning heaters, and outdoor wood burning devices. This rule establishes limitations on the installation of new wood burning fireplaces and wood burning heaters.

Specifically, at elevations below 3,000 feet in areas with natural gas service, no person shall install a wood burning fireplace, low mass fireplace, masonry heater, or wood burning heater.

Information about District Rule 4901 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/compliance/residential-wood-smoke-reduction- program/

Other District Rules and Regulations

The Project may also be subject to the following District rules: Rule 4102 (Nuisance) and Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations).

District Comment Letter

The District recommends that a copy of the District’s comments be provided to the Project proponent.

If you have any questions or require further information, please contact Ryan Grossman by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone at (559) 230-6569.

Sincerely,

Tom Jordan
Director of Policy and Government Affairs

Mark Montelongo
Program Manager

191
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Central Region
1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, California 93710
(559) 243-4005
www.wildlife.ca.gov

Conserving California’s Wildlife Since 1870
October 8, 2024

Liz Salazar, Assistant Planner
City of Clovis, Planning Department
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, California 93612
(559) 324-2305
[email protected]

Subject: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. Project (Project) TTM 6375, Early Consultation (CON)

Dear Liz Salazar:

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) received an Early Consultation (CON) request from the City of Clovis for the above-referenced Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines.1 Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect California fish and wildlife.

Likewise, CDFW appreciates the opportunity to provide comments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW, by law, may be required to carry out or approve through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under Fish and Game Code.

CDFW ROLE
CDFW is California’s Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and holds those resources in trust by statue for all the people of the State (Fish and Game Code, §§ 711.7, subd. (a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; CEQA Guidelines § 15386, subd. (a)). CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species (Id., § 1802). Similarly, for purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public agency environmental review efforts, focusing specifically on

1 CEQA is codified in the California Public Resources Code in section 21000 et seq. The “CEQA Guidelines” are found in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with section 15000.

Docusign Envelope ID: A2E95575-01A3-4094-A2F9-2A1F662AFFB4 192
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Liz Salazar
City of Clovis
October 8, 2024

Page 2 ends

Clovis City CouncilJanuary 21, 2025

Clovis City Council
January 21, 2025