Clovis City Council
February 4, 2025

February 04, 2025 - 1 - 1:53 PM A G E N D A • C I T Y C O U N C I L M E E T I N G

February 4, 2025 6:00 PM Council Chamber

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to access the City Council Chamber to participate at this meeting, please contact the City Clerk or General Services Director at (559) 324 -2060 (TTY – 711). Notificatio n 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the Council Chamber.

The Clovis City Council meetings are open to the public at the physical address listed above. There are numerous ways to participate in the City Council meetings: you are able to attend in person; you may submit written comments as described below; and you may view the meeting which is webcast and accessed at www.cityofclovis.com/agendas.

Written Comments

 Members of the public are encouraged to submit written comments at:
www.cityofclovis.com/agendas at least two (2) hours before the meeting (4:00 p.m.). You will be prompted to provide:

 Council Meeting Date
 Item Number
 Name
 Email
 Comment

 Please submit a separate form for each item you are commenting on.

 A copy of your written comment will be provided to the City Council noting the item number.

If you wish to make a verbal comment, please see instructions below.

 Please be aware that any written comments received that do not specify a particular agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the agenda.

 If a written comment is received after 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting, efforts will be made to provide the comment to the City Council during the meeting. However, staff cannot guarantee that written comments received after 4:00 p.m. will be provided to City Council during the meeting. All written comments received prior to the end of the meeting will be made part of the record of proceedings.

Council Chamber, 1033 Fifth Street, Clovis, CA 93612 (559) 324-2060 www.cityofclovis.com
1 February 04, 2025 - 2 - 1:53 PM CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION PROHIBITIONS AND MANDATORY DISCLOSURE – Pursuant to Government Code section 84308, a Councilmember shall not accept, solicit, or direct a campaign contribution of more than $500 from any party or their agent, or from any participant or their agent, while a proceeding involving a license, permit, contract, or other entitlement for use is pending before the City or for 12 months after a final decision is rendered in that proceeding. Any Councilmember who has received a campaign contribution of more than $500 within the preceding 12 months from a pa rty or their agent, or from a participant or their agent, must disclose that fact on the record of the proceeding and shall not make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence the decision.

Pursuant to Government Code section 84308, subdivision (e), any party to a covered proceeding before the City Council is required to disclose on the record of the proceeding any campaign contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $500 made within the pre ceding 12 months by the party or their agent to any Councilmember. The disclosure shall be made as required by Government Code Section 84308, subdivision (e)(1) and California Code of Regulations, Title 2, section 18438.8. No party or their agent, and no p articipant or their agent, shall make a campaign contribution of more than $500 to any Councilmember during the covered proceeding or for 12 months after a final decision is made in that proceeding. The foregoing statements do not constitute legal advice, and parties and participants are urged to consult with their own legal counsel regarding the applicable requirements of the law.

CALL TO ORDER

FLAG SALUTE - Councilmember Pearce

ROLL CALL

PUBLIC COMMENTS - This is an opportunity for the members of the public to address the City Council on any matter within the City Council’s jurisdiction that is not listed on the Agenda. In order for everyone to be heard, please limit your comments to 3 minutes or less, or 10 minutes per topic. Anyone wishing to be pl aced on the Agenda for a specific topic should contact the City Manager’s office and submit correspondence at least 10 days before the desired date of appearance.

CONSENT CALENDAR - Items considered routine in nature are to be placed upon the Consent Calendar. They will all be considered and voted upon in one vote as one item unless a Councilmember requests individual consideration. A Councilmember’s vote in favor of the Consent Calendar is considered and recorded as a separate affirmative vote in favor of each action listed. Motions in favor of adoption of the Consent Calendar are deemed to include a motion to waive the reading of any ordinance or resolution on the Consent Calendar. For adoption of ordinances, only those that have received a unanimous vote upon introduction are considered Consent items.

1. Administration - Approval - Minutes from the January 21, 2025, Council Meeting.

2. General Services – Approval – Res. 25 -___, Amending the City’s FY 2024 -2025 Position Allocation Plan by adding one (1) Deputy Fire Chief Position within the Fire Department.

2 February 04, 2025 - 3 - 1:53 PM

3. Planning and Development Services – Approval – Res. 25-___, A request authorizing the City Manager to execute a consultant service agreement between the City of Clovis and FCS International, Inc. for the preparation of a revised environmental impact report and related services associated with ±952 acres of property located north of Shepherd Avenue, between Sunnyside Avenue and the Big Dry Creek Reservoir.

4. Planning and Development Services - Approval – Res. 25-___, Amending the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) Schedule of Drainage Costs and Fees for 2025-2026.

5. Public Utilities – Approval – Final Acceptance for CIP 23-18, Letterman Dog Park, with a Final Contract Cost of $169,922.54.

6. Public Utilities – Approval – Waive Formal Bidding Requirements and Authorize the Purchase of Two (2) Refuse Automated Side -Loading Bod ies from AMREP, INC.

Using the Sourcewell Purchasing Contract in the Total Amount of $372,958, Including Installation.

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS - Administrative Items are matters on the regular City Council Agenda other than Public Hearings.

7. Consider Adoption – Ord. 25-01, an Ordinance Repealing Ordinance 24-16 Amending Section 2.1.01 of Chapter 2 of Title 2 of the Clovis Municipal Code Relating to City Council Meeting Day and Time Adopted on November 12, 2024. (Vote: 3-2 with Mayor Pro Tem Pearce and Councilmember Bessinger voting no)

Staff: Briana Parra, City Clerk
Recommendation: Adopt

8. Consider Approval – Award Recycling and Organic Material C ollection, Processing, and Marketing Services Agreement to Mid Valley Disposal; and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement on Behalf of the City.

Staff: Glenn Eastes, Assistant Public Utilities Director Recommendation: Approve

9. Receive and File – Police Department Update.

Staff: Curt Fleming, Police Chief
Recommendation: Receive and File

10. Receive and File – Fire Department Update.

Staff: Chris Ekk, Fire Chief
Recommendation: Receive and File

CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

COUNCIL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

3 February 04, 2025 - 4 - 1:53 PM

FUTURE MEETINGS

Regular City Council Meetings are held at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber. The following are future meeting dates:

February 11, 2025 (Tue.)
February 18, 2025 (Tue.)
March 4, 2025 (Tue.)

4 PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

CLOVIS CITY COUNCIL MEETING

January 21, 2025 6:00 P.M. Council Chamber

Meeting called to order by Mayor Mouanoutoua at 6:01
Flag Salute led by Councilmember Bessinger

Roll Call: Present: Councilmembers, Ashbeck, Basgall, Bessinger, Pearce Mayor Mouanoutoua

Councilmember Bessinger requested a moment of silence to honor Tony Guerrero, a retired Sanger police officer and respected Clovis community member who recently passed away.

PUBLIC HEARING – Item to be heard at 6:05 p.m.

6:05 ITEM 1 - RECEIVE AND FILE - INFORMATION FROM THIR D PUBLIC HEARING IN CITY’S TRANSITION TO DISTRICT-BASED ELECTIONS.

Brian Wilson, resident, inquired whether council members must live in their respective districts.

Josh Angle, resident, expressed support for districting, emphasizing that it would provide better representation and ensure that smaller communities feel heard, and suggested that a five-district model would be the most effective.

Eric Rollin, resident, advocated for a five -district system wit h a rotating mayor, highlighting the importance of balanced representation.

Steven Trevino, resident, asked for clarification on how the Council’s roles might change with elected by district representation.

Molly Allan, resident, expressed her appreciation for the City and its at-large system, noting that she values having multiple council members to address issues rather than relying on one district representative.

Susan Patterson, resident, voiced support for a five-district model with a rotating mayor but raised concerns about the socioeconomic balance within the proposed districts.

The Council provided direction to move forward with five districts and a rotating mayor. The Council recommended eliminating the 400-series maps and focus on refining the 500-series maps, particularly Map 503, which has the lowest population deviation. The Council also encouraged additional outreach and public input on the proposed maps.

5 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

PUBLIC COMMENTS – 6:04

Councilmember Bessinger noted for the record a written public comment from Dave DiPalma, who commended the City for its prompt resolution of a traffic sign issue, highlighting the City's dedication to responsive governance.

Patty Cassio, a resident, extended an invitation to the Council for the Annual Fresno Clovis Prayer Breakfast, featuring keynote speaker Dallas Jenkins.

CONSENT CALENDAR – 6:55

Upon call, there was no public comment.

Motion by Councilme mber Bessinger, seconded by Councilmember Ashbeck, that the items on the Consent Calendar be approved. Motion carried by unanimous vote.

2. Administration - Approval - Minutes from the January 13, 2025, Council Meeting.

3. General Services - Approval – Res. 25 -04, Authorizing Amendments to the City’s Classification and Compensation Plans to Adopt the Police Records Specialist I Classification with a Salary Range of $4,790 to $5,823 per month, Police Records Specialist II Classification with a Salary Range of $5,29 2 to $6,433 per month and the Senior Police Records Specialist Classification with a Salary Range of $5,878 to $7,145 per month and Approval – Res. 25-05, Amending the City’s FY 24 -25 Position Allocation Plan to Delete Seven (7) Principal Office Assistant Positions and Two (2) Administrative Assistant Positions, and adding Seven (7) Police Records Specialist I Positions and Two (2) Senior Police Records Specialist Positions within the Police Department.

PUBLIC HEARINGS – 6:56

6:56 ITEM 4 - CONSIDER VARIOUS ITEMS ASSOCI ATED WITH APPROXIMAT ELY 201

ACRES ON THE EAST SI DE OF NORTH MINNEWAW A AVENUE, BETWEEN EA ST BEHYMER AND SHEPHERD AVENUES. MULTIPLE, OWNERS; LENNAR HOMES , APPLICANT; YAMABE & HORN ENGINEERING INC., REPRESENTATIVE.

Steven Trevino, resident, expressed frustration about the concerns regarding toters and narrow alleyways.

Rose Coughlin, resident, discussed the challenges faced by renters, particularly in paying high rents and dealing with issues like inadequate living conditions and lack of amenities.

Molly Allan, resident, addressed concerns regarding parking and toter placement.

The Council raised concerns about the placement of toters, narrow alleyways, park space, and the lack of outdoor areas for children to p lay. They emphasized the importance of properly vetting developments to ensure they include amenities such as shade structures 6 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

in parks. The Council also suggested informing developers about connections early to avoid delays.

4A. CONSIDER APPROVAL - RES. 25-06, TM6375, A RESOLUTI ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR A 385-LOT SINGLE- FAMILY PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 58.9 ACRES OF LAND.

Motion for approval by Councilmember Ashbeck, seconded by Councilmember Basgall.

Motion carried by unanimous vote.

4B. CONSIDER APPROVAL - RES. 25-07, PDP2024-001, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A 385 -LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

Motion for approval by Councilmember Ashbeck, seconded by Councilmember Basgall.

Motion carried by unanimous vote.

4C. CONSIDER APPROVAL - RES. 25 -08, RO310, A RESOLUTIO N OF THE CITY

COUNCIL APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE

TERRITORY KNOWN AS T HE SHEPHERD-MINNEWAWA NORTHEAST
REORGANIZATION AREA (APPROXIMATELY 201 ACRES).

Motion for approval by Councilmember Ashbeck, seconded by Councilmember Basgall.

Motion carried by unanimous vote.

7:30 ITEM 5 - CONSIDER INTRODUCTION – ORD. 25 -__, AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE 24-16 AMENDING SECTION 2.1.01 OF CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE 2 OF THE

CLOVIS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DAY AND TIME ADOPTED ON NOVEMBER 12, 2024. (CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 2025).

Steven Trevino, resident, supports Monday meetings and recommends better agenda management.

Council discussion centered around supporting the return of Council meetings to Monday nights, with an emphasis on better agenda management. However, Mayor Pro Tem Pearce advocated for keeping the meetings on Tuesday to better support City staff and benefit residents.

City Attorney Cross pointed out that, due to the 30 -day period for the repeal of the ordinance, the meetings will remain on Tuesday nights for Febr uary with the first Monday meeting to occur in March . The Council asked staff to assist with notifying the public due the schedule changes.
7 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

Motion for approval by Councilmember Ashbeck, seconded by Councilmember Basgall.

Motion carried by 3-2 vote, with M ayor Pro Tem Pearce and Councilmember Bessinger voting no.

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS – 7:39

7:39 ITEM 6- UPDATE COUNCIL ON THE PLAN TO IMPROVE TH E AREA ON THE SOUTH

SIDE OF ASHLAN AVENU E JUST WEST OF LEONA RD AVENUE WITH MISSI NG SIDEWALK.

Rose Coughlin, resident, focused on the possibility of using funds from a lawsuit settlement with Shell to finance safety-related infrastructure projects, such as sidewalk improvements, and whether hiring outside engineers could help expedite these projects.

The Council expressed frustration with the five -year timeline for completing a sidewalk project, emphasizing the importance of the Safe Routes to School program and its funding.

They suggested contracting with a group of engineers to handle simpler projects l ike the sidewalks to avoid delays and urged staff to find ways to expedite the process.

7:51 ITEM 7 - CONSIDER AND PROVIDE DIRECTION ON FUTURE 2024-2025 BUDGET AMENDMENTS TO REACH THE GOALS OF MEASURE Y AND THE 2025 -2026 BUDGET PROCESS.

Eric Rollins, resident, emphasized the need for transparency and a citizen oversight committee for Measure Y funds, expressing concern that the tax wasn't designated specifically for police and fire services.

Patty Cassio, resident, praised the City's community outreach for Measure Y and emphasized the importance of the transparency and citizen oversight committee in ensuring accountability.

Rose Coughlin, resident, thanked City Manager or his respectful and responsive leadership, which contributed to her decision to remain in Clovis.

The Council directed staff to create a clear and separate line item for Measure Y funds in the budget to ensure transparency and accountability. The Council directed staff to look into creating a Citizen O versight Committee for Measure Y , which should be included in the ordinance amendment. Staff was instructed to explore best practices for structuring the committee, including potential models from other entities, such as the school district, to ensure it operates effectivel y and transparently. The Council emphasized the importance of early engagement in the budget process and requested earlier discussions with departments regarding their needs and priorities.

Specifically, staff was asked to present the five biggest vulnerabilities from each department, with a focus on public safety, including police and fire, as part of the budget presentation.

8 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO APPROVAL

CITY MANAGER COMMENTS – 8:51

City Manager Haussler reported that the Measure C Sales Tax Renewal Committee is being formed with applications due by January 31, 2025, the City Council will be asked to appoint a member to the committee in February, and Fire Station 2 has been reconstructed and will be operational by the end of the month with a celebration planned in the coming month.

COUNCIL COMMENTS - 8:52

It was the consensus of the Council to direct staff to bring back a report or update on the Historical Preservation Commission to provide an overview of the current status and allow for further direction if needed.

ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Mouanoutoua adjourned the meeting of the Council to February 4, 2025.

Meeting adjourned: 8:59 p.m.

______________________________ ________________________________ Mayor City Clerk
9 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: General Services Department
DATE: February 4, 2025
SUBJECT: General Services – Approval – Res. 2 5-___, Amending the City’s FY 2024-2025 Position Allocation Plan by adding one (1) Deputy Fire Chief Position within the Fire Department.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 25-____ Position Allocation Plan

RECOMMENDATION
For City Council to approve a resolution amending the City’s FY 2024 -2025 position allocation plan by adding one (1) Deputy Fire Chief position within the Fire Department.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Currently, the Fire Department is authorized to have one (1) Deputy Fire Chief position.

However, the Department needs to add one (1) additional Deputy Fire Chief position to facilitate succession planning and accommodate the City’s growth. Council approval is required to make changes to the Position Allocation Plan.

BACKGROUND
The Fire Department has recently evaluated its roles and respons ibilities and is proposing the addition of one (1) Deputy Fire Chief position. The primary responsibilities of our current Deputy Fire Chief include overseeing the Operations, Training, and Logistics Divisions, and supervising the three battalion chiefs, t wo training captains, and a logistics officer. Additionally, the current Deputy Chief oversees dispatch, facilities, fleet management, special teams and personnel supervision. With anticipated staffing increases in the future and the possibility of creatin g an advanced life support emergency medical delivery model in the coming years, the Department is projected to increase operations staffing and expand programs, requiring an additional Deputy Fire Chief to manage the increased responsibilities, workload, and personnel supervision. This additional Deputy Chief will also be critical to the succession plan of the department. This change will restore management staffing levels to those of 2008, when the Fire Department previously had two (2) Deputy Fire Chief positions.

10 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact of salary and benefits for the remainder of FY 202 4-2025 is approximately an additional $78,000. There are adequate funds in the Fire Department budget to cover the costs of this position for this fiscal year.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
The addition of one (1) Deputy Fire Chief, reflects the evolving level of responsibility for staff within the Fire Department.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The position allocation for the Fire Department will be modified as noted in Attachment 1A.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

Prepared by: Lori Shively, Deputy General Services Director

Reviewed by: City Manager AH

11 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 25-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY’S FY 2024-2025 POSITION ALLOCATION PLAN

WHEREAS, the FY 2024-2025 Position Allocation Plan in the Fire Department was approved as part of the FY 2024-2025 City Budget adoption process; and

WHEREAS, a review of the staffing needs for the Fire Department indicates that the addition of one (1) Deputy Fire Chief position is needed in order to provide the necessary support for the Fire Department; and

WHEREAS, amending the City’s adopted FY 2024-2025 Position Allocation Plan requires City Council authorization.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Clovis shall amend the City’s FY 2024-2025 Position Allocation Plan as noted in Attachment A.

* * * * * *

The foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on February 4, 2025, by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED: February 4, 2025

___________________________ __________________________ Mayor City Clerk

12 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

ATTACHMENT A

POSITION ALLOCATION ADJUSTMENT BY DEPARTMENT FY 2024-2025

DEPARTMENT NUMBER OF POSITIONS

Fire

Add: Deputy Fire Chief 1.0

13 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services
DATE: February 4, 2025
SUBJECT: Planning and Development Services – Approval – Res. 2 5-___, A request authorizing the City Manager to execute a consultant service agreement between the City of Clovis and FCS International, Inc. for the preparation of a revised environmental impact report and related services associated with ±952 acres of property located north of Shepherd Avenue, between Sunnyside Avenue and the Big Dry Creek Reservoir.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Res. 25-___, Consultant Service Agreement

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the request authorizing the City Manager to execute a consultant service agreement between the City of Clovis and FCS International, Inc. (FCS) for the preparation of a revised environmental impact report (EIR) and related services for the Vista Ranch project.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wilson Premier Homes, Inc. (Applicant) is proposing a ±952 acre sphere of influence (SOI) amendment for an area north of Shepherd Avenue between, Sunnyside Avenue and the Big Dry Creek Reservoir, as shown in Figure 1. The Applicant is also proposing the development of a master planned community and the annexation of ±507 acres within the ± 952 acre area. In addition to these applications, the project is associated with general plan amendments, a prezone, and vesting tentative tract map . As the lead agency responsible for reviewing the project entitlements, the City must comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The requested project entitlements require the preparation of an EIR.

In November 2022, the City Council ap proved an EIR consultant agreement with De Novo Planning Group (De Novo). Between December 2022 and July 2024, De Novo worked on the preparation of a draft EIR for the project. The draft EIR was released for public comment in July 2024 and staff received several comments. Based on the comments received on the draft EIR, staff concluded that preparing a revised EIR is the best method to thoroughly and comprehensively address all comments. Although a revised EIR will add several months to the 14 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.
proposed project timeline, the applicant agrees with the revised EIR approach as the best method to provide the most thorough and complete EIR to inform the public and City as the lead agency of the environmental impacts of the proposed project. Consequently, staff and th e Applicant decided to prepare a revised EIR with a new EIR consultant, FCS. The new consultant was selected to thoroughly address the comments received on the draft EIR and prepare a revised EIR.

BACKGROUND
This section serves as a brief summary of the timeline of events related to the request for an EIR consultant.

 November 2022: City Council approved a consultant service agreement between the City of Clovis and De Novo for the preparation of an EIR and related services for the project, and submittal of an application to the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) to amend the City of Clovis SOI to include ±923 acres.

 December 2022 to July 2024: De Novo worked on data collection and preparation of the EIR. The draft EIR was released for public comment on July 19, 2024.

 September 2024: The City received several comments in response to the draft EIR.

After review of the comments, staff and the applicant decided to work with a new firm to prepare a revised EIR. The revised EIR will incorporate additional clarification and responses to address the public comments.

15 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS

Consultant Service Agreement
The original consultant service agreement was executed with De Novo in December 2022. The current request is for a revised EIR to be prepared under a separate consultant service agreement with a new firm. The new firm , FCS, was selected from the Planning and Development Services environmental consultant pre -approved list that was established through a competitive request for qualifications process.

Environmental Impact Report
The scope for this consultant service agreement is the preparation of a revised EIR to assess the potent ial environmental impacts associated with an amendment to the City’s SOI and related entitlements for a master planned community. The revised EIR will address the public comments received on the draft EIR released in July 2024. The revised EIR will be prep ared by Jason Brandman, Senior Vice President of Environmental Services for FCS, who will serve as the primary point of contact and project manager. Mr. Brandman has many years of experience preparing environmental analyses for similar projects. In addition, FCS has a local office and is recognized as a leading expert in the California Environmental Quality Act.

Ultimately, staff is confident in FCS’s qualifications to prepare the revised EIR and effectively address the comments received. A full scope of work and budget for the project can be found in Attachment 1A to this staff report.

The anticipated timeline for completion of the revised EIR is approximately 10 to 12 months.

Upon completion, staff will return to the City Council for certification of the revised EIR.

The consultant cost for completion of the revised EIR is $331,947. This includes $316,140 for the EIR plus a 5% contingency of $ 15,807. The contingency amount is to cover unforeseen changes and/or overages throughout the contract at the direction of City staff, if needed. Lastly, the City imposes an administrative cost for time associated with managing the EIR process which is 15% of the cost of the EIR. Thus, $ 49,792.05 will be added to the cost of the EIR. In summary, the total cost of preparation of the EIR is $381,739.05 ($331,947 + $49,792.05), and this cost is the applicant’s responsibility. As the scope of work is refined for final approval, the estimates provided above may be adjusted accordingly. A separate agreement outlining the applicant’s responsibilities for funding the agreement will be prepared and executed by staff.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
Staff is seeking City Council authorization for the City to enter into an agreement with FCS for the preparation of a revised EIR related to the request to include ±952 acres into the City of Clovis SOI and related entitlements for a master planned community.

16 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
If directed by City Council to proceed, the following will occur:
 Staff will finalize the consultant service agreement with FCS for the preparation of the revised EIR;
 Upon execution of the EIR consultant service agreemen t, an EIR scoping meeting will occur, and work will commence; and
 Staff will work on the related general plan amendments, master plan, prezoning, tract maps, SOI amendment and annexation.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

Prepared by: McKencie Perez, Senior Planner

Reviewed by: City Manager AH

17 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-____

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSULTANT SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH FCS INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE PREPARATION OF A

REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND RELATED SERVICES

WHEREAS, a request from Wilson Premier Homes , Inc. (Applicant) was received by the City of Clovis to amend the Clovis sphere of influence (SOI) and develop a master planned community; and

WHEREAS, the City requires assistance from an external consulting firm to assist with the preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) and related services for purposes of analyzing potential environmental effects, related to a request for a SOI amendment to include approximately 952 acres generally located north of Shepherd Avenue to Behymer Avenue, from Sunnyside Avenue to the Big Dry Creek Reservoir, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; and

WHEREAS, De Novo Planning Group (De Novo) was originally selected to perform these services and released the draft EIR in July 2024 and several public comments were received; and

WHEREAS, staff and the Applicant have determined that preparation of a revised EIR with a new EIR consultant to thoroughly and comprehensively address the comments is most appropriate for this project at this time; and

WHEREAS, FCS International, Inc. has been selected to perform these services based on their substantial experience with the preparation of EIR’s and technical studies for similar projects and their familiarity with the required scope of work.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Clovis City Council approves the consultant service agreement with FCS International, Inc. attached hereto as Attachment A addressing the preparation of a revised EIR and related services, and authorizes the City Manager to execute the consultant service agreement with FCS International, Inc.

* * * * *

18 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on February 4, 2025, by the following vote, to wit.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED: February 4, 2025

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

19 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

CITY OF CLOVIS

CONSULTANT SERVICE AGREEMENT

VISTA RANCH SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AMENDMENT

This Consultant Services Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between the City of Clovis, a California general law city ("City") and FCS International, Inc. ("Consultant") with respect to the following recitals, which are a substantive part of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective on [Date] ("Effective Date").

RECITALS

A. City desires to obtain planning and environmental study services ("Services") for the proposed Vista Ranch Sphere of Influence Amendment Project “(Project”) as more fully described in the Scope of Work for the Project (Exhibit A), and Budget for the Project (Exhibit B), which are incorporated herein by reference.

B. Consultant is engaged in the business of furnishing the Services and hereby warrants and represents that Consultant is qualified, experienced, and capable of performing the Services, and possesses any required licenses, certifications, security/bonding, and/or training necessary to perform the Services.

C. City desires to retain Consultant, and Consultant desires to provide the City with the Services, on the terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual agreements herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services described in the Recitals and detailed in Exhibits A and B. Changes in the scope of Services, including the work performed and/or deliverables produced, shall be made in writing and particularly describe the changes in Services, including payment/costs and schedule/term, as applicable.

2. Priority and Conflicts; Exclusions. If the terms and requirements of this Agreement conflict with Exhibits A or B, the terms of this Agreement shall control. No contractual terms and/or conditions found in Exhibits A or B shall purport to waive, disclaim, or limit Consultant’s liability, indemnification obligations, warranties, damages for breach or delay, or any security, bonding, or insurance requirements, and any such provisions shall have no force or effect with respect to this Agreement and the Services performed by Consultant.

3. Term of Agreement; Commencement of Services; Schedule; Site Conditions. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, and Consultant shall begin performing the Services on that date, unless otherwise instructed by City. The Services shall proceed in accordance with the Task Schedule set forth in Exhibits A and B, and Consultant shall continue with the Services until satisfactorily completed, as determined by City. The Task Schedule shall be subject to modification based on the City’s operational needs.

City will notify Consultant in advance of any modification to the Task Schedule.

Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary herein, the parties acknowledge performance of the Services may require Consultant’s employees to be present on-site at the Project location from time to time. City will be responsible for requiring third parties other than Consultant to provide a reasonably safe and legally compliant worksite and working conditions while Consultant’s employees and equipment are on the Project site performing Services. Consultant shall notify City in writing of any unsafe or non-compliant worksite conditions at the Project location and City shall cure any identified worksite deficiencies within three Attachment A
20 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

(3) working days of receipt of Consultant’s notice. Consultant may cease performing on-site Services at the Project location during the cure period. If the identified worksite deficiencies are not able to be cured within three (3) working days the parties shall meet and confer as soon as practicable to negotiate a mutually agreeable modification of the Services or amendment to this Agreement to meet the Task Schedule. Or, the parties or either party may terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 17b, with the notice period reduced to seven days (7) herein if an agreement is not reached to modify the Services or amend this Agreement.

4. Payment for Services. City shall pay Consultant for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement according to the rate(s) stated in Exhibit B. The individual budget amounts for each task, and the cumulative budget totals, paid by City to Consultant shall not exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. The foregoing is inclusive of all labor, equipment, materials, costs and expenses, taxes, and overhead. City shall pay Consultant for Services satisfactorily performed pursuant to this Agreement.

Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City containing detailed billing information regarding the Services provided and amounts expended to date, which shall reflect the City’s initial deposit.

Consultant recognizes that the Project is being initiated by the development community, with the principal developer being Wilson Premier Homes, Inc. (“Developer”). City will be entering into a contract with Wilson Premier Homes, Inc. to fund most of the costs of the Services. Therefore, City’s ability to pay Consultant for the Services will be dependent in substantial part on payment by the Developer.

After receipt of Consultant’s monthly invoice, City shall apply funds from any Developer deposit made for the purposes of funding the Project and make payment to Consultant within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. If Developer funds on deposit a re insufficient to cover the invoice, City shall take reasonable steps to ensure that payment to Consultant for its invoice is made to Consultant within sixty (60) days of submittal to the City; provided, however, the parties acknowledge and agree that payment to Consultant for the invoice shall not be due and payable from the City until such time as City has sufficient funds on deposit from Developer to pay such invoice amount.

Should the Developer decide to abandon the Project by not making further deposits to City, City and Consultant shall work cooperatively together to terminate the Services or otherwise negotiate amendments to this Agreement.

5. Independent Contractor Status. Consultant and its subcontractors shall perform the Services as independent contractors and not as officers, employees, agents or volunteers of City. Consultant is engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business to perform the Services required by this Agreement and is hereby retained to perform work that is outside the usual course of City’s business. Consultant is free from the control and direction of City in connection with the manner of performance of the work. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to create any contractual relationship between City and Consultant's employees or subcontractors, nor shall anything contained in this Agreement be deemed to give any third party, including but not limited to Consultant's employees or subcontractors, any claim or right of action against City.

6. Consultant Representations; Standard of Care; Compliance with Law. Consultant represents that Consultant and any subcontractors utilized by Consultant are and will be qualified in the field for which Services are being provided under this Agreement and Consultant and any subcontractors are now, and will be throughout their performance of the Services under this Agreement, properly licensed, certified, secured/bonded, trained, and/or otherwise qualified and authorized to perform the Services required and contemplated by this Agreement, as may be required by law. Consultant and its subcontractors shall utilize the standard of care and skill customarily exercised by members of their profession, shall use reasonable diligence and best judgment while performing the Services, and shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and industry standards.

7. Identity of Subcontractors and Sub-Consultants. Consultant shall, before commencing any work under 21 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

this Agreement, provide to City in writing: (a) the identity of all subcontractors and sub-consultants (collectively referred to as "subcontractors"), if any, Consultant intends to utilize in Consultant's performance of this Agreement; and (b) a detailed description of the full scope of work to be provided by such subcontractors.

Consultant shall only employ subcontractors pre-approved by City and in no event shall Consultant replace an approved subcontractor without the advance written permission of City, with the understanding that City's permission will not be unreasonably withheld. Notwithstanding any other provisions in this Agreement, Consultant shall be liable to City for the performance of Consultant's subcontractors.

8. Subcontractor Provisions. Consultant shall include in its written agreements with its subcontractors, if any, provisions which: (a) impose upon the subcontractors the obligation to provide to City the same insurance and indemnity obligations that Consultant owes to City; (b) make clear that City intends to rely upon the reports, opinions, conclusions and other work product prepared and performed by subcontractors for Consultant; and (c) entitle City to impose upon subcontractors the assignment rights found elsewhere in this Agreement.

9. Power to Act on Behalf of City. Consultant is not acting as an agent of City and shall not have any right, power, or authority to create any obligation, express or implied, or make representations on behalf of City except as may be expressly authorized in advance in writing from time to time by City and then only to the extent of such authorization.

10. Record Keeping; Reports. Consultant shall keep complete records showing the type of Services performed. Consultant shall be responsible and shall require its subcontractors to keep similar records. City shall be given reasonable access to the records of Consultant and its subcontractors for inspection and audit purposes.

Consultant shall provide City with a working draft of all reports upon reasonable request by City and of all final reports prepared by Consultant under this Agreement.

11. Ownership and Inspection of Documents. All data, tests, reports, analyses, documents, records, conclusions, opinions, recommendations and other work product generated by or produced for Consultant or its subcontractors in connection with the Services, regardless of the medium, including physical drawings and materials recorded on computer discs or other electronic devices ("Work Product"), shall be and remain the property of City. City shall have the right to use, copy, modify, and reuse the Work Product as it sees fit. Upon City's request, Consultant shall make available for inspection and copying all such Work Product and all Work product shall be turned over to City promptly at City's request or upon termination of this Agreement, whichever occurs first. Consultant shall not release any Work Product to third parties without prior written approval of City. This obligation shall survive termination of this Agreement and shall survive for four (4) years from the date of expiration or termination of this Agreement.

12. Confidentiality. All Work Product prepared and performed by and on behalf of Consultant in connection with the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be kept confidential and shall be disclosed only to City, unless otherwise provided by law or expressly authorized by City. Consultant shall not disclose or permit the disclosure of any confidential information acquired during performance of the Services, except to its agents, employees and subcontractors who need such confidential information in order to properly perform their duties relative to this Agreement. Consultant shall also require its subcontractors to be bound to these confidentiality provisions.

13. City Name and Logo. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to the City projects or work for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's Services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production, internet website, social media, or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

14. Conflicts of Interest. Consultant warrants that neither Consultant nor any of its employees have an improper interest, present or contemplated, in the Services which would affect Consultant’s or its employees’ performance of the Services and the Work Product produced. Consultant further warrants that neither Consultant 22 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

nor any of its employees have real property, business interests or income that will be affected by the Services.

Consultant covenants that no person having any such interest, whether an employee or subcontractor shall perform the Services under this Agreement. During the performance of the Services, Consultant shall not employ or retain the services of any person who is employed by the City or a member of any City Board or Commission.

15. Non-liability of Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successors in interest, in the event of a default or breach by City for any amount which may become due Consultant or its successor, or for any breach of any obligation under the terms of this Agreement.

16. City Right to Employ Other Consultants. Unless Exhibit A specifically provides that the Services City seeks pursuant to this Agreement are exclusive to Consultant, this Agreement and performance of the Services are non-exclusive and City reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with the Services while this Agreement is in effect.

17. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement shall terminate as provided in Section 3, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the following:

a. Termination by City: For Convenience. City may at its discretion terminate this Agreement for convenience and without cause upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant. Upon receipt of a termination notice pursuant to this subsection, Consultant shall promptly discontinue all Services affected, unless the notice directs otherwise.

b. Termination by City or Consultant: For Cause. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon ten (10) days prior written notice to the other party of a material breach, and a failure within that time period to cure or commence reasonable steps to cure the breach.

c. Compensation to Consultant Upon Termination. Consultant shall be paid compensation for Services satisfactorily performed prior to notice of termination. As to any phase partially performed but for which the applicable portion of Consultant's compensation has not become due, Consultant shall be paid the reasonable value of its Services provided. However, in no event shall such payment when added to any other payment due under the applicable part of the work exceed the total compensation of such part as specified Section 4. In the event of termination due to Consultant’s failure to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of City, City may withhold an amount that would otherwise be payable as an offset to City's damages caused by such failure.

d. Effect of Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall: (i) promptly discontinue all Services affected, unless the notice of termination directs otherwise; and (ii) deliver or otherwise make available to the City, without additional compensation, all Work Product and/or deliverables accumulated by the Consultant in performing this Agreement, whether completed or in process. Consultant may not refuse to provide such Work Product for any reason whatsoever.

18. Insurance. Consultant shall satisfy the insurance requirements set forth in Exhibit C.

19. Indemnity and Defense. Consultant hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from and against all claims, demands, causes of action, actions, damages, losses, expenses, and other liabilities, (including without limitation reasonable attorney fees and costs of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with the alleged or actual acts, errors, omissions or negligence of Consultant or its subcontractors relating to the performance of Services described herein to the fullest extent permitted by law, unless the injuries or damages are the result of City's sole negligence or willful misconduct, subject to any limitations imposed by law. Consultant and City agree that said 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

indemnity and defense obligations shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement for any items specified herein that arose or occurred during the term of this Agreement.

20. Taxes. Consultant agrees to pay all taxes, licenses, and fees levied or assessed by any governmental agency on Consultant incident to the performance of Services under this Agreement, and unemployment and workers’ compensation insurance, social security, or any other taxes upon the wages of Consultant, its employees, agents, and representatives. Consultant agrees to obtain and renew an annual business tax certificate from City and pay the applicable annual business registration tax to City during the term of this Agreement.

21. Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any duties or obligations hereunder shall be assignable by Consultant without the prior written consent of City. In the event of an assignment to which City has consented, the assignee shall agree in writing to personally assume and perform the covenants, obligations, and agreements herein contained. In addition, Consultant shall not assign the payment of any monies due Consultant from City under the terms of this Agreement to any other individual, corporation or entity. City retains the right to pay any and all monies due Consultant directly to Consultant.

22. Form and Service of Notices. Any and all notices or other communications required or permitted by this Agreement or by law to be delivered to, served upon, or given to either party to this Agreement by the other party shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly delivered, served or given by one of the following methods:

a. Personally delivered to the party to whom it is directed. Service shall be deemed the date of delivery.

b. Delivered by e-mail to a known address of the party to whom it is directed provided the e-mail is accompanied by an acknowledgment of receipt by the other party. Service shall be deemed the date of acknowledgement.

c. Delivery by a reliable overnight delivery service, ex., Federal Express, receipted, addressed to the addressees set forth below the signatories to this Agreement. Service shall be deemed the date of delivery.

d. Delivery by deposit in the United States mail, first class, postage prepaid. Service shall be deemed delivered ninety-six (96) hours after deposit.

23. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the Exhibits and any other attachments, represents the entire Agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral with respect to the subject matter herein. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both City and Consultant.

24. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

25. Authority. The signatories to this Agreement warrant and represent that they have the legal right, power, and authority to execute this Agreement and bind their respective entities. Evidence of Consultant’s authority is attached as Exhibit D.

26. Severability. In the event any term or provision of this Agreement is declared to be invalid or illegal for any reason, this Agreement will remain in full force and effect and will be interpreted as though such invalid or illegal provision were not a part of this Agreement. The remaining provisions will be construed to preserve the intent and purpose of this Agreement and the parties will negotiate in good faith to modify any invalidated provisions to preserve each party’s anticipated benefits.

24 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

27. Applicable Law and Interpretation and Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall, in all cases, be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against either party. This Agreement is entered into by City and Consultant in the County of Fresno, California. Consultant shall perform the Services required under this Agreement in the County of Fresno, California. Thus, in the event of litigation, venue shall only lie with the appropriate state or federal court in Fresno County.

28. Amendments and Waiver. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended in any way, and no provision shall be waived, except in writing signed by the parties hereto. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. Failure of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

29. Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to confer any rights upon any party not a signatory to this Agreement.

30. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts such that the signatures may appear on separate signature pages. A copy or an original, with all signatures appended together, shall be deemed a fully executed Agreement.

31. Alternative Dispute Resolution. If a dispute arises out of or relating to this Agreement, or the alleged breach thereof, and if said dispute cannot be settled through negotiation, the parties agree first to try in good faith to settle the dispute by non-binding mediation before resorting to litigation. The mediator shall be mutually selected by the parties, but in case of disagreement, the mediator shall be selected by lot from among two nominations provided by each party. All costs and fees required by the mediator shall be split equally by the parties, otherwise each party shall bear its own costs of mediation. If mediation fails to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days, either party may pursue litigation to resolve the dispute.

Demand for mediation shall be in writing and delivered to the other party to this Agreement.

A demand for mediation shall be made within reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for mediation be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such a claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by California statues of limitations.

32. Non-Discrimination. Consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of any protected class under federal or State law in the provision of the Services or with respect to any Consultant employees or applicants for employment. Consultant shall ensure that any subcontractors are bound to this provision. A protected class, includes, but is not necessarily limited to race, color, national origin, ancestry, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, and disability.

33. Performance Requirements. Notwithstanding, and in addition to the provisions of, Section 17 of this Agreement, if the Services performed hereunder are not in conformity with the requirements of this Agreement and other pertinent documents, City shall have the right to require Consultant to correct the work in conformity with the requirements of this Agreement at no additional increase in the payment to Consultant. Consultant shall promptly correct the work rejected by City for failing to conform to the requirements of the Agreement. Remedy for non-compliance or non-performance shall commence within 24 hours of notice. City shall also have the right to require Consultant to take all necessary steps to ensure future performance of the Services in conformity with the requirements of this Agreement. In the event Consultant fails to correct the work or fails to take necessary steps to ensure future performance of the Services in conformity with the requirements of this Agreement, City shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement for default.

25 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

Now, therefore, the City and Consultant have executed this Agreement on the date(s) set forth below.

CONSULTANT CITY OF CLOVIS

By: __________________________ By: ______________________________ Jason Brandman, Sr. VP, Andrew Haussler, City Manager Environmental Services

Date: __________________ Date: ______________________

By: __________________________
Patrick Schultz, COO

Date: __________________

Party Identification and Contact Information:

Consultant City of Clovis
FCS International, Inc. Planning and Development Services Department Attn: Jason Brandman Attn: McKencie Perez, MPA
Sr. VP, Environmental Services Senior Planner
[email protected] 1033 Fifth Street
(925) 200-1656 Clovis, CA 93612
[email protected]
(559) 324-2310

ATTEST

_______________________________
Briana Parra, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

_______________________________
Scott G. Cross, City Attorney

J:\wdocs\00607\145\AGT\00851862.DOC

26 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF WORK

27 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

i
Southern California
250 Commerce, Suite 210
Irvine, CA 92602

Central Valley
7726 N. First Street #413
Fresno, CA 93720

Northern California
2999 Oak Road, Suite 250
Walnut Creek, CA 94597

Phone +1 888 826 5814
+1 714 508 4100
Fax +1 714 508 4110
Email [email protected]

firstcarbonsolutions.com
January 16, 2025
McKencie Perez, MPA, Senior Planner
City of Clovis, Planning Division
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612
Subject: Scope of Work to Prepare a Revised Environmental Impact Report for the Vista Ranch Project
Dear McKencie:

The City of Clovis (City) is seeking assistance to prepare a revised Environmental Impact Report (EIR), provide any necessary supporting technical studies, and peer review previously prepared technical studies for the proposed Vista Ranch Project (proposed project).

FCS International, Inc., doing business as FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS), has more than 42 years of experience in preparing a full range of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review documents, including EIRs and various technical studies/analyses to support similar types of development projects throughout the State, including the Central Valley and jurisdictions through Fresno County.

To that end, FCS prides itself not only on the quality of our technical work, but also on our highly responsive and proactive problem-solving approach. In addition to our in-house team of technical experts, CEQA specialists, and legal counsel, FCS will provide a seasoned management team to oversee this important project.

As the City’s on-call consultant, we are committed to responding to project needs in a timely and cost- effective manner. Should you have any questions regarding this Scope of Work, please contact us at 925.200.1656 or [email protected].

We look forward to continuing our successful working relationship with you on this important project.

Sincerely,

Jason Brandman, Senior Vice President/Director
FirstCarbon Solutions
7726 N. First Street, #413
Fresno, CA 93720

Phil Ault, Director of Noise and Air Quality
FirstCarbon Solutions
7726 N. First Street, #413
Fresno, CA 93720
28 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

1 PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
Project Understanding
Background
FCS understands that the proposed project was evaluated in a Draft EIR prepared for the City of Clovis published on July 19, 2024. The prior Draft EIR was circulated for public review from July 19, 2024, to September 3, 2024. Based on updates to the Project Description, including a greater focus on analyzing the proposed project from both a programmatic and project-level detail, and in response to the comments received on the Draft EIR, FCS is tasked to prepare a revised EIR, for which a Scope of Work is provided below.

Project Description
FCS understands that the proposed project would include an expansion of the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI) to include an approximately 952-acre area outside of the current SOI boundary directly north of the city limits in unincorporated Fresno County, which would be analyzed at the programmatic level in the Draft EIR. The proposed project would include the adoption of a comprehensive Vista Ranch Master Plan, which would guide development within approximately 507 acres of the SOI expansion area. This Master Plan Area would be analyzed at the programmatic level in the Draft EIR. Furthermore, the proposed project would include the approval and implementation of the Vista Ranch Development, which would develop approximately 368 acres of the Master Plan Area with mixed uses over the next 10 years. The Vista Ranch Development would be analyzed at the project-level within the Draft EIR.

Additionally, the other approximately 445 acres of the SOI expansion area would include no entitlements or proposed development (Non-Development Area).

The Vista Ranch Master Plan would include up to 3,286 residential units, 16 acres of commercial and mixed uses, 19 acres for a new elementary school, and 59 acres of parks, trails, and open space. The proposed project would also include utilities service to the project site, including stormwater drainage, potable water, wastewater treatment, and electricity.

The Vista Ranch Development would include up to 2,718 residential units, a mixed-use village core area, and trails, parks, and open space. The Vista Ranch Development would also include transportation infrastructure, including roadways, sidewalks, and bike lanes. The proposed project would also include a bridge across the Big Dry Creek Reservoir Outlet Works Channel downstream of the spillway.

Additionally, Derrel’s Mini-Storage facility is located within the Master Plan Area but has already undergone separate CEQA analysis with the County of Fresno. 29 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

2 Approach
FCS will utilize several of the technical studies prepared for the prior Draft EIR to the extent feasible.

These include, but are not limited to:
• Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) Model
• Biological Resources Assessment for the Triangle Property (ECORP Consulting) • Delineation of Potential Jurisdictional Aquatic Resources, Vista Ranch Project Site (Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting)
• Biological Assessment prepared to support Clean Water Act Section 404 permitting for development of MPArea 1 (Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting) • Results of protocol-level rare plant surveys conducted in 2023 (Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting)
• Results of protocol-level dry season surveys for vernal pool branchiopods conducted in 2023 (Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting)
• Conceptual mitigation planning documentation for development of MPArea 1 entitled Wilson Premier Homes-Vista Ranch, Mitigation Overview (Redtail Consulting) • Draft Incidental Take Permit application currently being prepared for development of MPArea 1 (Redtail Consulting)
• Cultural Resources Inventory Report, Triangle Property Project, Fresno County, California (ECORP Consulting)
• Geotechnical Investigation
• Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
• Report of Findings, Phase II Limited Subsurface Survey and Soil Pile Sampling, Shepherd North Properties, North Side of East Shepherd Avenue, Clovis, California. • Clovis Vista Ranch CEQA Transportation Evaluation (June 27, 2024) • Vista Ranch Transportation Impact Analysis (September 4, 2024) • Wastewater Study
• Water Supply Assessment
• Water Infrastructure Investigation

The various biological resources, cultural resources, and Tribal Cultural Resources documents are further discussed in Task 3, below. FCS will prepare an air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and energy 30 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

3 analysis, as well as a noise analysis for the proposed project, as further discussed in Task 4, below. Any studies that require additional edits for use in the Revised Draft EIR will be updated in coordination with the City and applicant.

FCS will also utilize relevant information from the prior Draft EIR to help streamline the preparation of the Revised Draft EIR.

Additionally, FCS will review the comments submitted during the Public Comment period of the prior Draft EIR and will ensure that the relevant concerns and comments are adequately addressed in the Revised Draft EIR.

Scope of Work
Task 1: Project Initiation and Kick-off Meeting
FCS will review relevant background material, develop an initial data needs list, and coordinate with the City to schedule a kick-off meeting (it is anticipated that the kick-off meeting will be completed via teleconference). The intent of the kick-off meeting is to clarify and confirm the details of the Scope of Work and schedule, obtain copies of the project plans and other relevant information, and identify key points of contact. FCS will review relevant background documents to ensure project understanding. It is typically helpful to have all relevant team members attend this call (i.e., applicant, civil engineering design team, and general contractor, if applicable). FCS will also provide a Request for Information (RFI), which will detail additional information needed to complete CEQA analyses.

Task 2: Preparation of Comprehensive Project Description It is our understanding that the City will provide FCS with a Project Description. Using the information provided in that Project Description and obtained during project initiation, FCS will prepare a comprehensive Project Description per CEQA requirements for the City and applicant’s review and approval. The Project Description will identify the project location, describe the project characteristics, identify necessary approvals, and list other agencies that may use the document for environmental review. The Project Description will use graphics and tables to clearly convey relevant information to the reviewer and will include all of the information required to define the proposed project for the purposes of CEQA, including a clear explanation of the development components of the proposed project, a description of the construction and operational activities associated with the proposed project, and clearly illustrated project components displayed in exhibits based on Geographic Information System (GIS) data.

The approved Project Description will form the basis for evaluating the proposed project in the EIR. The draft Project Description will be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the development of the Administrative Draft EIR. It is assumed that the City will provide one set of consolidated, vetted comments (with tracked changes in the Word document) on the draft Project Description and a 31 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

4 complete RFI to FCS within 2 weeks of submittal. FCS will revise the Project Description and provide it to the City and the applicant within 1 week for final approval. Changes to the Project Description made after the applicant has issued their approval may require a Change Order and may extend the project schedule.

Deliverable
• Electronic version (via email in Microsoft Word) of the Project Description to the City

Task 3: Peer Review of Previously Prepared Technical Studies FCS will peer review key technical studies prepared by the applicant to verify their completeness accuracy for purposes of CEQA; ensure consistency with the City’s General Plan and Development Code; ensure compliance with all applicable environmental laws, regulations, rules, and requirements; and ensure legal defensibility and accuracy in the representation of project-related information.

FCS’s team of in-house experts includes a Senior Environmental Services Director, CEQA Project Managers, Senior Air Quality Scientist, Senior Biologist, Senior Archaeologist, Senior Noise Scientist, expert in-house legal counsel, publications specialists, and other relevant technical staff.

The team will perform a thorough review of study methodology, modeling, findings, and results to identify inaccuracies, inconsistencies, or incompleteness, with a focus on ensuring the studies are legally defensible and adequate for purposes of CEQA. In the event that any inadequacies or inconsistencies are found in any of the technical studies, FCS will prepare a brief peer review memorandum for each study that outlines these inaccuracies. Any additional analysis (including additional rounds of review or any need to do site visits) would be addressed in a separate scope and fee. The following technical studies to be provided by the applicant will receive the above-described level of peer review:
• Biological Documentation
- Biological Resources Assessment for the Triangle Property (ECORP Consulting) - Delineation of Potential Jurisdictional Aquatic Resources, Vista Ranch Project Site (Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting)
- Biological Assessment prepared to support Clean Water Act Section 404 permitting for development of MPArea 1 (Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting) - Results of protocol-level rare plant surveys conducted in 2023 (Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting)
- Results of protocol-level dry season surveys for vernal pool branchiopods conducted in 2023 (Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting)
- Conceptual mitigation planning documentation for development of MPArea 1 entitled Wilson Premier Homes-Vista Ranch, Mitigation Overview (Redtail Consulting) - Draft Incidental Take Permit application currently being prepared for development of MPArea 1 (Redtail Consulting)
32 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

5 • Cultural Investigation and Tribal Consultation Documentation - Cultural Resources Inventory Report, Triangle Property Project, Fresno County, California (ECORP Consulting)
• Geotechnical Investigation
• Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
• Report of Findings, Phase II Limited Subsurface Survey and Soil Pile Sampling, Shepherd North Properties, North Side of East Shepherd Avenue, Clovis, California. • Wastewater Study
• Water Supply Assessment
• Water Infrastructure Investigation
FCS will deliver the peer review memoranda for each report to the City. This Scope of Work assumes the applicant will provide revised studies, which FCS will peer review for a second time to ensure revisions from the peer review memoranda were incorporated. Any additional peer review would be covered under a separate scope and fee. Once the studies are deemed complete by the City as applicable, FCS will incorporate the results of the studies, including findings and recommendations, into the Administrative Draft EIR. The studies will be included as an appendix to the Draft EIR.

Subtask 3.1: Peer Review of Biological Resources Supporting Information FCS will peer review the applicant-provided biological documentation, detailed above, to ensure the supporting information is prepared according to established industry best practices and accurately characterizes the project site. The information will be reviewed for consistency, completeness, and adequacy for purposes of CEQA. As part of the peer review process, a qualified FCS’s Biologist will perform a field visit to verify the existing conditions of the project site. FCS will provide one brief peer review memorandum to the City that documents the peer review findings. This subtask accounts for one set of consolidated, vetted comments from the applicant team. FCS assumes that responses to these vetted comments will be sufficient. If they are not and additional comments are required, an augment will be needed to finalize the document. Once the studies are deemed complete by the City, FCS will incorporate the biological resources supporting information and additional information provided from the field visit into the Biological Resources section of the EIR, and this information will be appended to the EIR.

Deliverable
• Electronic copy (via email in PDF) of the peer review memorandum to the City.

Subtask 3.2: Peer Review of Cultural Resources Analysis FCS will peer review the applicant-provided cultural resources supporting information, detailed above, for the purposes of CEQA adequacy, consistency among technical reports, and accuracy in the representation of project-related information and impacts. FCS will provide a brief peer review 33 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

6 memorandum to the City that documents the peer review findings that will include the identification of any potential data gaps and further recommendations. FCS will incorporate the results of the cultural resources supporting information, including findings and recommendations, into the Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources section of the EIR and will include the cultural resources supporting information as an appendix to the EIR. This Scope of Work assumes that the cultural resources supporting information is adequate for the purposes of CEQA. Any additional analysis (including a site visit) required would be addressed in a separate scope and fee.

Deliverable
• Electronic version (via email in PDF) of the peer review memorandum to the City.

Subtask 3.3: Peer Review of Other Previously Prepared Technical Studies FCS will peer review the previously prepared Geotechnical Investigation, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Phase II Limited Subsurface Survey and Soil Pile Sampling Report of Findings, Wastewater Study, Water Supply assessment, and Water Infrastructure Investigation to ensure that the reports are adequate for the purposes of CEQA and accurate in their representation of project-related information and impacts. FCS will provide a brief peer review memorandum to the City that documents the peer review findings that will include the identification of any potential data gaps and further recommendations. FCS will incorporate the results of the into the applicable topical sections of the Revised Draft EIR. This Scope of Work assumes that the above reports are adequate for the purposes of CEQA. Any additional analysis required would be addressed in a separate scope and fee.

Deliverable
• Electronic version (via email in PDF) of the peer review memorandum to the City.

Task 4: Technical Analyses
Subtask 4.1: Air Quality Assessment, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Assessment, and Health Risk Assessment
FCS will prepare an air quality, GHG emissions, and energy analysis to evaluate project-related construction and operational activities. The analysis will be wholly contained in the appropriate section of the EIR with any relevant supporting technical data appended to the document. The analysis will utilize, to the extent feasible, information from the analysis contained in the prior Draft EIR. But the following scope is proposed to ensure the analysis accounts for changes to the Project Description and updated traffic data. In addition, the analysis will be expanded to include site-specific impact analysis for the Vista Ranch Development as well as programmatic level analysis for the additional Master Plan Area and Non-Development Area of the proposed project.
34 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

7 Air Quality Analysis
FCS will prepare an air quality analysis consistent with the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines and San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (Valley Air District) to support the CEQA document. The proposed project would include construction and operational activities that would generate ozone precursor and criteria air pollutant emissions. FCS will use methodologies and guidance from Valley Air District Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts to model and evaluate the proposed project’s air quality impacts.

A project-level analysis of the Vista Ranch Development will quantify short-term construction emissions using the latest version of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). The modeling will incorporate the type and size of the proposed uses, construction phasing schedule, and other construction data (duration of construction, area of land to be disturbed/graded, etc.). This scope assumes project site preparation and grading will be completed in up to six phases, as well as an additional phase for construction of the bridge. Modeling and analysis of any additional phases beyond this would be accomplished under a separate scope and fee.

Long-term (i.e., operational) regional criteria air pollutant and precursor estimates will include emissions from the proposed project’s area, stationary, and mobile sources. Mobile-source emissions will be based, in part, on the transportation analysis to be prepared for the proposed project. Stationary sources, such as emergency generators, if part of the proposed project, will be quantified using appropriate emission factors and methodologies from the Valley Air District, the California Air Resources Board (ARB), and/or United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The operational analysis will account for the proposed phasing to identify the maximum yearly emissions associated with buildout of the project.

A programmatic level analysis will also be provided to evaluate potential air quality emissions impacts of future development buildout of the Vista Ranch Master Plan. Mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts of future development will also be identified.

Health Risk Assessment
The Valley Air District suggests impacts associated with toxic air contaminant (TAC) exposure should be addressed on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the specific construction-related characteristics of each project and proximity of sensitive receptors to sources of TACs. Based on the proximity of sensitive receptors and the potential for construction and operations of the project to overlap, FCS recommends performing a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) to evaluate potential construction-related TAC impacts for the Vista Ranch Development. Potential health risk impacts from the additional Master Plan Area of the proposed project will be addressed at the programmatic level.

The major TAC that affects health impacts in the air from typical construction activities is diesel particulate matter (DPM). DPM from the operation of diesel trucks and heavy construction equipment has been identified by the ARB as a carcinogen that can result in long-term health impacts. This scope 35 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

8 assumes project site preparation and grading will be completed in up to six phases, as well as an additional phase for construction of the bridge. Modeling and analysis of any additional phases beyond this would be accomplished under a separate scope and fee. The following tasks will be required for the HRA to evaluate potential construction-related TAC impacts for the Vista Ranch Development:
• Define what a sensitive receptor is and identify nearby sensitive receptors. • Identify applicable federal, State, and Valley Air District rules and regulations. • Identify health risk standards and acceptable cancer and acute and chronic non-cancer risk thresholds from diesel emissions that are detailed in the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) HRA Guidelines.
• Determine the on-site construction equipment DPM emissions rates. • Obtain the daily construction truck trip estimates used in the air quality analysis and calculate off-site heavy-duty truck DPM emissions rates within approximately 1,000 feet of the project site.
• Calculate the DPM concentrations at the nearby sensitive receptors associated with the on- site construction equipment and off-site truck emissions up to 1,000 feet from the project site using the emissions rates calculated in the previous steps and the methodology recommended by the Valley Air District and OEHHA.
• Utilize the prior task’s calculated toxic air emission levels to calculate the cancer risk and the chronic and acute non-cancer health impacts at the nearby residential uses from construction of the proposed project. The resulting health risk impacts will be compared to the applicable project-level significance thresholds defined by the Valley Air District. • Mitigation measures will be identified, if necessary, to reduce emissions for those pollutants that exceed any significance thresholds.
• A conservative reasonable worst-case analysis approach will be taken, where the analysis will evaluate impacts to the maximally exposed off-site and earliest occupied on-site (Phase 1) receptors from all phases of construction.

FCS assumes that an operational HRA will not be warranted to identify and quantify the potential cumulative health risks during project operations of the Vista Ranch Development. However, in the process of evaluating operational air quality emissions, FCS will confirm whether potential operation emission levels would warrant an HRA. If an operational HRA is required, it would be accomplished as an additional service not included in this Scope of Work.

An HRA of the additional Master Plan Area and Non-Development Area will be evaluated at a programmatic level, and mitigation measures to help reduce potential impacts of future development will be identified.
36 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

9 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis
FCS will evaluate the proposed project’s construction and operational GHG emissions using assumptions and methodologies consistent with those used in the air quality analysis. Estimated GHG emissions will be evaluated against appropriate significance thresholds, which will be supported by substantial evidence in the CEQA document.

A programmatic level analysis of potential GHG emission impacts of future development buildout of the Vista Ranch Master Plan and Non-Development Area will be provided, and mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts of future development will be identified.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, FCS will also evaluate the project’s design and purpose in the context of consistency with applicable GHG reduction plans, including ARB’s 2022 Scoping Plan. The GHG Emissions Analysis will also address the California Supreme Court ruling on the Newhall Ranch project and will utilize current approved methods for analyzing GHG impacts. Additional measures or design considerations to reduce potential impacts will be identified.

Energy Analysis
FCS will provide an analysis of energy impacts consistent with the CEQA Guidelines Appendix F Energy analysis requirements. The energy analysis will summarize relevant federal, State, and local regulations and policies that address energy consumption and demand, alternative fuels, and nonrenewable resources to determine whether the proposed project would conflict with or obstruct any required policies or mandatory measures related to energy conservation.

Using the model inputs and assumptions associated with the air quality and GHG emissions analyses, FCS will provide energy consumption estimates associated with the construction and operation of the Vista Ranch Development project. The energy analysis will consider project design features that may affect the energy efficiency of the proposed project.

A programmatic level analysis of potential energy impacts of future development buildout of the Vista Ranch Master Plan and Non-Development Area will also be provided, and mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts of future development will be identified.

Data Needs and Assumptions
FCS will prepare and submit an RFI for the applicant to provide all necessary construction and operational parameters required for modeling. This analysis will be completed within 6 weeks of receipt of the RFI response, necessary traffic data, and the client-approved Project Description, whichever is latest. If changes are made to the Project Description that would require re-modeling for the above Scope of Work, it would be accomplished as an additional service not included in this Scope of Work. 37 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

10 Subtask 4.2: Noise Impact Analysis
FCS will complete a noise analysis that will include an evaluation of short-term (construction) and long- term (operation) noise impacts to satisfy the City’s noise impact analysis requirements. The analysis will be wholly contained in the EIR, and the supporting technical data will be appended to the document; it is assumed no stand-alone study will be prepared. The analysis will utilize, to the extent feasible, information from the analysis contained in the prior Draft EIR. But the following scope is proposed to ensure the analysis accounts for changes to the Project Description and updated traffic data. In addition, the analysis will be expanded to include site-specific impact analysis for the Vista Ranch Development as well as programmatic level analysis for the additional Master Plan Area and Non-Development Area of the proposed project.

Compile and Summarize Background Information
The general characteristics of sound and the categories of audible noise will be described. The regulatory framework related to noise, including applicable federal, State, and City plans, policies, and standards, will be summarized. The existing ambient environment conditions will be documented through traffic noise modeling. Up to six short-term ambient noise measurements will be taken to document the existing daytime ambient noise conditions in the project vicinity, especially near off-site sensitive receptor land uses.

Construction Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis
Construction of the Vista Ranch Development project would involve the short-term operation of heavy equipment in the vicinity of sensitive receptor land uses. EPA-recommended noise emission levels will be used for the construction equipment. Noise analysis requirements and thresholds of significance will be based on the sensitivity of the project area and the City’s Noise Ordinance specifications.

FCS will also analyze potential vibration impacts from construction activities associated with development that could occur with implementation of the proposed project. FCS will utilize the methodology and thresholds contained in the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual prepared by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for determining construction-related groundborne vibration impacts.

A programmatic level analysis of anticipated construction noise and vibration impacts associated with future development buildout of the Vista Ranch Master Plan will also be provided. Mitigation measures to reduce potential construction noise and vibration impacts of future development will be identified.

Operational Noise Impact Analysis
A quantitative assessment of long-term operational noise impacts will be performed. Project-related traffic noise impacts associated with the proposed project will be determined based on whether the proposed project would generate a substantial increase in traffic noise levels in the project vicinity in 38 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

11 excess of standards established in the City’s General Plan or Noise Ordinance. Potential noise impacts from project-related stationary noise sources, such as new mechanical system operations and parking lot activities, will also be evaluated to determine whether the proposed project would generate a substantial increase in ambient noise levels in excess of the City’s operational noise performance standards.

A programmatic level analysis will also be provided to evaluate potential operational noise impacts of future development buildout of the Vista Ranch Master Plan or related to the Non-Development Area.

Mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts of future development will also be identified.

Data Needs and Assumptions
FCS will prepare and submit an RFI for the applicant to provide all necessary construction and operational parameters required for modeling. This analysis will be completed within 6weeks of receipt of the RFI response, necessary traffic data, and the client-approved Project Description, whichever is latest. If changes are made to the Project Description that would require re-modeling for the above Scope of Work, it would be accomplished as an additional service not included in this Scope of Work.

Subtask 4.3: Transportation Impact Analysis
As a subconsultant to FCS, Peters Engineering will review previously prepared transportation analyses and will prepare the Transportation section of the Draft EIR. This analysis will require the following tasks.

Kick-off Meetings/Coordination with Client
If requested by the City, Peters Engineering will attend meetings or otherwise coordinate with the City and/or applicant.

Document Review
Peters Engineering will review available documents, primarily a TIA report dated September 4, 2024, prepared by Kittelson & Associates and the Draft EIR for the Vista Ranch Project dated July 2024, including the Clovis Vista Ranch CEQA Transportation Evaluation dated June 2024.

City Circulation Element Research
Peters Engineering will coordinate with City staff to confirm whether any portion of the project site, or potentially a given number of residential units within the project site, was included in the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Report (SDEIR) for the Clovis General Plan Circulation Element Update dated June 29, 2022. City Council Resolution 22-120 adopted the SDEIR, Findings of Fact, and Statement of Overriding Considerations relative to a significant and unavoidable transportation impact based on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Resolution 22-121 amended the City of Clovis General Plan to incorporate provisions related to VMT impact evaluation criteria.
39 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

12 Traffic Analyses
Peters Engineering will perform intersection and road segment operational analyses (level of service [LOS] and queuing) utilizing data available in the TIA to the extent possible. The following scenarios will be analyzed:
• Near-Term Plus Development (Residential Only);
• Near-Term Plus Master Plan (Residential Only).

The purpose of the analyses is to identify whether the proposed project would cause additional transportation impacts if all residential phases are constructed before any commercial phases are constructed.

The traffic volumes will be developed by manually assigning the residential trip generation estimates in the TIA to the study intersections and road segments in generally the same proportion as the total Project trips were assigned in the TIA.

The time periods to be analyzed include the weekday AM and PM peak hours and will match those analyzed in the TIA.

Where the analyses reveal that an intersection or road segment is expected to operate below the City’s target LOS, improvements will be recommended that would be expected to reduce delays to an acceptable level.

Collision History/Safety Discussion
Consultant will research collision history at each of the study intersections. Crash records will be obtained from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the years 2019 through 2023. Any records available for 2024 will also be included. The crash records will be summarized and presented in the supplemental traffic impact analysis report.

An assessment of the proposed project’s potentially significant impacts on traffic safety concerns, such as site distance issues, non-standard design features, or the need for different intersection control will be studied.

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation Analyses and Discussion Peters Engineering will provide a discussion of VMT mitigation measures, including measures not applicable to the proposed project, to provide a comprehensive report addressing a majority of the known VMT mitigation strategies and how they apply (or do not apply) to the proposed project, the Clovis area, and the Fresno County region. Mitigation measures to be discussed are those listed in the City of Clovis Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated September 15, 2022, the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity, dated October 2024, and typical measures addressed in papers produced by the California Air Resources Board (ARB). To the 40 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

13 extent feasible, Peters Engineering will provide analyses to quantify the VMT reduction that may be expected from each mitigation measure.

Draft EIR Transportation Section
Peters Engineering will be available to assist with writing and/or reviewing the transportation section of the Revised Draft EIR. In addition to clarifying VMT impacts and mitigation measures as they pertain to the Development versus the Master Plan, Peters Engineering will assist with incorporating results of operational analyses that were presented in the TIA but were not presented in the prior Draft EIR. The results of the operational analyses will be presented separately for the Development and the Master Plan as a whole, along with mitigation measures for each as presented in the TIA.

It is not anticipated that additional traffic analyses will be required, or that Peters Engineering would perform additional traffic modeling or prepare another traffic impact analysis report.

Meetings and Consultation
Peters Engineering will be available to meet with FCS and/or the City and provide traffic engineering consultation, document review, analyses, and opinions on an as-needed basis.

Assumptions
This Scope of Work assumes that if additional traffic modeling is required, an approved Fresno County Council of Governments (Fresno County COG) traffic modeling consultant would be utilized to perform traffic modeling under a separate scope and fee. Although it is not anticipated to be required, in the event that a full-scale revision of the TIA is required, or that additional scenarios require analysis, a separate proposal will be provided based on the actual Scope of Work identified.

Task 5: Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meeting
FCS will prepare a Draft Notice of Preparation (NOP) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15082.

The NOP will identify the project location, provide a summary of the project characteristics, and list probable environmental effects, supported by tables and color graphics. FCS will submit the Draft NOP to the City. It is assumed that the City will provide one set of consolidated, vetted comments (with tracked changes in the Word document) on the Draft NOP to FCS within 2 weeks of submittal. Once FCS receives these comments, FCS will complete revisions and prepare a NOP for public review. FCS will submit the NOP and accompanying Notice of Completion (NOC) to the State Clearinghouse (SCH) electronically. The City will be responsible for distributing the NOP to public agencies and private parties. This Scope of Work assumes that an Initial Study will not be prepared.

Deliverables
• Electronic copy (via Dropbox in Microsoft Word and PDF) of the Draft NOP to the City. • Electronic copy (via Dropbox in PDF) of the NOP to the City. 41 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

14 • Electronic copy (via CEQAnet) of the NOP and NOC to the SCH.

Public Scoping Meeting
Following release of the NOP , the City will hold a Public Scoping Meeting that FCS representatives will attend. It is assumed that the public scoping meeting will be conducted in person and that FCS staff would lead the meeting. During the meeting, FCS will monitor comments received, answer questions as directed by staff, and, following the meeting, provide a summary of public comments regarding any environmental concerns raised. Input will be used to focus the issues to be addressed in the Draft EIR.

The summary of verbal comments and the written comments letters will be appended to the Draft EIR. A summary of the verbal and written comments will be included in Introduction section of the Draft EIR.

Task 6: Administrative Revised Draft EIR
FCS will prepare the Administrative Revised Draft EIR in accordance with the applicable requirements contained in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15120 through 15132. The document will identify potentially significant impacts, feasible mitigation measures, and the residual significance after mitigation has been implemented. The Administrative Revised Draft EIR will include narrative text, tables, exhibits, and technical appendices. The contents of the Administrative Draft EIR are listed as follows:
• Executive Summary
• Introduction
• Project Description
• Environmental Impact Analysis
• Aesthetics
• Agriculture and Forestry Resources
• Air Quality
• Biological Resources
• Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
• Energy
• Geology and Soils
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials
• Hydrology and Water Quality
• Land Use and Planning
• Mineral Resources
• Noise
• Population and Housing
• Public Services
• Recreation
• Transportation
• Utilities and Service Systems
• Wildfire
• Alternatives
• Other CEQA Considerations
• Effects Found Not To Be Significant
• List of Preparers and Contributors
• Technical Appendices
Executive Summary
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15123, the Executive Summary will summarize the proposed project, list the environmental topics that are comprehensively addressed in the Draft EIR, list the project alternatives, identify potential areas of controversy, and provide a matrix listing environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and the residual significance of all impacts. 42 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

15 Introduction
The Introduction section will summarize the purpose and background of the proposed project, identify the lead agency, and describe the scope of the Revised Draft EIR and the document’s organization. The Introduction will also identify the environmental topics that were evaluated at a sufficient level of detail in the NOP and Effects Found not to be Significant section, described below, and, thus, are not being re- evaluated in the Revised Draft EIR.

Project Description
One of the first key actions will be to formulate a working description of the proposed project. FCS will utilize the Project Description that was created under Task 2, which will articulate the proposed project’s overall objectives. FCS will prepare the Project Description section of the Draft EIR based upon information provided during project initiation and comments received on the NOP .

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15124, the Project Description will identify the project location, describe the project characteristics, list the project objectives, identify necessary approvals, and list other agencies that may use the document. The Project Description will also describe the relationship of the proposed project to the City’s General Plan. The Project Description will use color graphics and tables to clearly convey relevant information to the reviewer.

Establishment of Thresholds of Significance
FCS will work with the City to establish thresholds of significance for each environmental issue to be addressed in the Draft EIR. The thresholds will be stated in each topical section of the Revised Draft EIR to clearly illustrate the analytical process used to identify potential project effects.

Effects Identified as Potentially Significant
FCS will conduct an environmental analysis of the proposed project to include documenting baseline conditions, conducting project and cumulative impact evaluations (separated as applicable into project- level and program-level discussions), and formulating mitigation measures for each environmental issue that result in a potentially significant impact. As outlined above, a series of technical reports and analyses will be the basis for preparation of the Revised Draft EIR. FCS will summarize and incorporate the findings and recommendations of these technical reports into the document as appropriate based on their level of significance.

Cumulative Effects
FCS will describe the reasonably foreseeable projects within a City-approved defined study area that may result in cumulative impacts associated with the proposed project This Scope of Work assumes that the City will provide FCS with a list of cumulative projects to be included in the analysis. 43 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

16 Cumulative projects may be defined within a specified area around the project site as (1) projects constructed, but not occupied; (2) projects approved, but not constructed; (3) pending projects for which pre-filing or filing of an application with its respective lead agency has occurred; and (4) anticipated or announced projects for which no application has yet been filed with the lead agency.

However, note that the geographical extent of the evaluation area for cumulative impacts varies, depending upon the technical issue to be addressed. For instance, the evaluation area for air quality encompasses the local air basin, while the evaluation area for traffic encompasses the local roadway network. Findings of recent court cases will be used to address all pertinent issues. Cumulative projects will be discussed for each technical issue. Growth-inducing impacts will be evaluated separately in the Revised Draft EIR in the Other CEQA Considerations section.

Alternatives
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, the EIR will evaluate a range of feasible alternatives to the proposed project. One of the alternatives will be the CEQA-mandated “No Project Alternative,” which is the circumstance under which the project does not proceed. FCS will evaluate up to two additional alternatives. In addition, the Alternatives section will address the feasibility of any alternatives that were initially considered but rejected from further consideration. Each alternative will be described in sufficient detail and evaluated on a topical section basis against the proposed project to determine whether it will have fewer, equivalent, or greater impacts. A matrix will be provided comparing each alternative’s impacts on the various topical areas. The environmentally superior alternative will be identified.

Effects Found not to be Significant
CEQA Guidelines Section 15143 establishes that EIRs will focus on significant impacts on the environment and need not discuss in detail effects that are clearly insignificant or unlikely to occur. FCS will prepare the NOP , identifying any resource categories or topical areas that can be “scoped out” pursuant to Section 15143 given the location and context of the project site. A section titled Effects Found not to be Significant will be included in the Revised Draft EIR to document the justification for resource categories excluded from detailed analysis in the Revised Draft EIR.

Deliverable
• Electronic copy (via Dropbox in Microsoft Word and PDF) of the Administrative Revised Draft EIR (with technical studies appended) to the City.

Task 7: Screencheck Revised Draft EIR
It is assumed that the City will provide one set of consolidated, vetted comments (with tracked changes in the Word document) on the Administrative Revised Draft EIR. Once FCS receives these comments, FCS will complete revisions and prepare a Screencheck Revised Draft EIR for review. Note that this Scope of Work assumes only one round of City comments and revisions to the Administrative Revised Draft EIR. 44 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

17 Should the estimated hours needed to complete this task exceed the cost identified herein, FCS will coordinate with the City regarding the need for additional funds to ensure incorporation of all comments and edits.

Deliverable
• Electronic copy (via Dropbox in Microsoft Word and PDF) of the Screencheck Revised Draft EIR to the City. FCS will also provide a track change version in Microsoft Word of the Screencheck Revised Draft EIR for reference.

Task 8: Public Revised Draft EIR
We assume that the City will provide one set of consolidated, vetted comments (with tracked changes in the Word document) on the Screencheck Revised Draft EIR. Upon receipt of final City comments on the Screencheck Revised Draft EIR, FCS will proceed with finalizing and producing the Revised Draft EIR for public review. This task assumes technical staff time to complete revisions to the Revised Draft EIR, plus editing and administrative staff time to prepare the document for publication. If additional hours are required, FCS will prepare a budget augment to cover the additional level of effort.

FCS will prepare, and City staff will distribute, copies of the Revised Draft EIR to responsible agencies and the public for a 45-day public review period. FCS will provide the SCH with an electronic copy of the document (and appendices) and required notices and forms (the NOC, Notice of Availability [NOA], and Summary Form) via CEQAnet to begin the public review period. FCS will be responsible for drafting the NOC and Summary Form and the City will be responsible for drafting the NOA. FCS will provide copies of the Revised Draft EIR to the City, and the City will be responsible for local distribution, noticing, and posting. Finally, this Scope of Work assumes that City staff will prepare and mail all notices associated with the Revised Draft EIR to local agencies and interested parties.

Deliverables
• Electronic copy of the Revised Draft EIR and appendices (via Dropbox in PDF) to the City. • Two hard copies of the Revised Draft EIR and appendices to the City. • Electronic copy (via CEQAnet) of the Revised Draft EIR and appendices, NOC, NOA, and the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Summary Form to the SCH.

Task 9: Administrative Final EIR
FCS will prepare an Administrative Final EIR in accordance with the applicable requirements contained in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15088 and 15089. The Administrative Final EIR will list all agencies, organizations, and individuals who submitted written comments on the Revised Draft EIR during the public review period and provide written responses to each comment. Additionally, the Administrative Final EIR will contain an Errata, which will document minor changes to the Draft EIR text in strikeout- underline format.
45 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

18 Based on FCS’s experience responding to comments on recent City projects, we have budgeted 120 hours of FCS staff time (including technical, editing, and administrative personnel) for this task. Together with the City, FCS will evaluate the volume and complexity of comments received on the Draft EIR. If additional time is required beyond what is budgeted, FCS will prepare a budget augment to cover the actual level of effort.

Deliverable
• Electronic copy of the Administrative Final EIR (via Dropbox in Microsoft Word and PDF) to the City.

Task 10: Screencheck Final EIR
FCS will respond to City comments on the Administrative Final EIR. It is assumed that the City will provide one set of consolidated, vetted comments (with tracked changes in the Word document) on the Administrative Final EIR. Upon receipt of the consolidated set of comments, FCS will prepare the Screencheck Final EIR.

The intent of the Screencheck Final EIR is to allow City staff to review final changes to the Final EIR prior to publication. It is anticipated that any comments on the Screencheck Final EIR would concern minor points and not require major revisions.

Deliverable
• Electronic copy of the Screencheck Final EIR (via Dropbox in Microsoft Word and PDF) to the City. FCS will also provide a track change version of the Screencheck Final EIR for reference.

Task 11: Final EIR
It is assumed that the City will provide one set of consolidated, vetted comments (with tracked changes in the Word document) on the Screencheck Final EIR. Once City staff provides final comments on the Screencheck Final EIR, FCS will proceed with finalizing and producing the Final EIR. This task assumes technical staff time will be required to complete revisions to the Final EIR, plus editing and administrative staff time to prepare the document for publication. If additional hours are required, we will prepare a budget augment to cover the actual level of effort.

FCS will provide copies of the Final EIR to the City, who will be responsible for local distribution, noticing, and posting. FCS will also prepare the Notice of Determination (NOD) for the project, which the City will file, within 5 business days of EIR certification. This Scope of Work assumes that City staff will prepare and mail all notices associated with the Final EIR to local agencies and interested parties.

Deliverables
• Electronic copy (via Dropbox in Word and PDF) of the Final EIR to the City. 46 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

19 • Two hard copies of the Final EIR to the City.
• An electronic copy of the NOD to the City.

Task 12: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
FCS will prepare a comprehensive Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15097. The MMRP will contain all mitigation measures identified in the Draft EIR. This comprehensive MMRP will provide City staff with a single source of reference to the full range of mitigation measures to be implemented. The MMRP will clearly identify project-level and program- level mitigation measures, as identified in the EIR. For each measure or group of similar measures, the agency responsible for ensuring proper implementation will be identified, along with the timing and method of verification. The MMRP will be included in the Final EIR submittal.

Once FCS receives consolidated, vetted comments (with tracked changes in the Word document) on the MMRP , FCS will complete revisions and provide the City with a final MMRP .

Deliverables
• Electronic copy (via email in Microsoft Word) of the Draft MMRP to the City. • Electronic copy (via email) of the MMRP (PDF) to the City.

Task 13: Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093, FCS will prepare draft Findings of Fact for each potentially significant effect identified in the EIR and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for any unavoidable significant impacts associated with the proposed project. As required by CEQA Guidelines, one of three findings must be made for each significant effect and must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The Statement of Overriding Considerations will rely on input from the Project Team regarding the benefits of the proposed project. FCS’s Project Manager will consult with the City to review the draft Findings of Fact and to finalize the findings.

Deliverables
• Electronic copy (via Dropbox in Microsoft Word) of the draft Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations to the City.
• Electronic copy (via Dropbox in PDF) of the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations to the City.

Task 14: Meetings, Public Hearings, and Phone Calls
This Scope of Work assumes that FCS’s Project Director or Project Manager will attend the following meetings:
47 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

20 Coordination Meetings:
• Eight half-hour meetings with City staff conducted during the preparation of the Draft EIR. It is assumed these meetings can be completed via conference call.

Final EIR and Project Entitlements:
• Planning Commission–one, 4-hour meeting
• City Council–one, 4-hour meeting

The cost for the Public Scoping Meeting is included in Task 5. As noted, the meetings would consist of a combination of coordination meetings with staff and public hearings. A not-to-exceed budget has been established to cover attendance at the meetings. If the City requests additional meeting attendance by FCS staff, or if the amount of time involved in these meetings exceeds the initial budget allocation, FCS will notify City staff of the additional costs and obtain authorization for the extra meeting time.

Task 15: Project Management
In addition to the research, analysis, communications, and report writing tasks described above, FCS will perform a variety of project management duties to ensure that the EIR meets the City’s standards of quality, and that it is delivered on time and within budget. These duties will include team supervision and coordination, oral and written communications with City staff, project accounting, and quality assurance review by FCS’s Project Director and Technical Editor of all deliverable products. These services will also include ongoing support to City staff, such as providing input to staff reports, regular schedule updates, and discussions of technical issues. This task assumes 75 hours of staff time.

Tasks Outside the Scope of Work
The following are tasks FCS has identified as falling outside its Scope of Work for the proposed project.

Newspaper Noticing/Local Noticing
FCS assumes that City staff will be responsible for any public noticing related to the certification of the EIR.

Notice of Determination Filing/Payment of Fees
FCS assumes that the City staff will be responsible for filing the NOD with the Fresno County Clerk’s Office within 5 business days of certification of the EIR. Please be advised that as of January 1, 2025, the filing fees for an EIR will be $4,123.50 (California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW] fee) plus a $50 County handling fee, for a grand total of $4,173.50. The applicant will be responsible for paying the associated filing fees.
48 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

EXHIBIT B

BUDGET AND TASK SCHEDULE

49 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

21 PROPOSED SCHEDULE
FCS has prepared the following schedule outlining the anticipated timing of each task.

Task Week
Task 1: Project Initiation and Kick-off Meeting 1
Task 2: Preparation of Comprehensive Project Description 1–3 Task 3: Peer Review of Previously Prepared Technical Studies 1-5 Subtask 3.1: Peer Review of Biological Resources Supporting Information 3 – Revision of supporting information based on FCS peer review 5 Subtask 3.2: Peer Review of Cultural Resources Analysis 3 – Revision of supporting information based on FCS peer review 5 Subtask 3.3: Peer Review of Other Previously Prepared Technical Studies 3 – Revision of supporting information based on FCS peer review 5 Task 4: Technical Analysis 1–10
Subtask 4.1: Air Quality Assessment, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Assessment, and Health Risk Assessment1
10 Subtask 4.2: Noise Impact Analysis1 10
Subtask 4.3: Transportation Impact Analysis 10
Task 5: Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meeting 3–9
– Submit Administrative Notice of Preparation 3
– Receive Comments on Notice of Preparation 5
– Start of Public Scoping Period (Begin 30-day Public Review) 6 – Public Scoping Meeting TBD (to occur
during public
scoping period)
– 30-day Public Review Period Ends 10
Task 6: Administrative Revised Draft EIR 1-17
– Submit Administrative Revised Draft EIR 13
– Receive Comments on Administrative Revised Draft EIR 17 Task 7: Screencheck Revised Draft EIR 17-23
50 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

22 Task Week
– Submit Screencheck Revised Draft EIR 20
– Receive Comments on Screencheck Revised Draft EIR 23
Task 8: Public Revised Draft EIR 23-31
– Begin 45 Day Public Review Period 24
– 45-day Public Comment Period Ends 31
Task 9: Administrative Final EIR 31-39
– Meet with City to review comments received 32
– Submit Administrative Final EIR2 36
– Receive Comments on Administrative Final EIR 39
Task 10: Screencheck Final EIR 39-43
– Submit Screencheck Final EIR 41
– Receive Comments on Screencheck Final EIR 43
Task 11: Final EIR 45
Task 12: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 39-45 – Submit draft Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 41 – Receive Comments on Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 43 – Submit Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 45 Task 13: Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 39-45 – Submit draft Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 41 – Receive Comments on Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 43 – Submit Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 45 Task 14: Meetings, Public Hearings, and Phone Calls To Be Determined Task 15: Project Management Ongoing
File NOD with Fresno County Clerk Within 5 business
days of EIR
Certification
Note:
1 Analysis will be conducted 6 weeks after receipt of the necessary traffic data, responses to the RFI, and approved Project Description, whichever is latest. This assumes this data will be available by week 4 after project initiation. 2 Dependent on volume and complexity of comments.

51 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

23 PROPOSED BUDGET
FCS has prepared the following budget identifying the costs of each task.

Task Fees
Task 1: Project Initiation and Kick-off Meeting $4,595
Task 2: Preparation of CEQA-compliant Project Description $4,970 Task 3: Peer Review of Previously Prepared Technical Studies Subtask 3.1: Peer Review of Biological Resources Supporting Information $7,770 Subtask 3.2: Peer Review of Cultural Resources Analysis $3,430 Subtask 3.3: Peer Review of Other Previously Prepared Technical Studies $8,560 Task 4: Technical Analysis
Subtask 4.1: Air Quality Assessment, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Assessment, and Health Risk Assessment
$29,450
Subtask 4.2: Noise Impact Analysis $9,720
Subtask 4.3: Transportation Impact Analysis $69,730
Task 5: Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meeting $6,610 Task 6: Administrative Revised Draft EIR $55,775
Task 7: Screencheck Revised Draft EIR $24,715
Task 8: Public Revised Draft EIR $9,815
Task 9: Administrative Final EIR $25,305
Task 10: Screencheck Final EIR $12,215
Task 11: Final EIR $6,920
Task 12: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program $2,370 Task 13: Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations $8,950 Task 14: Meetings, Public Hearings, and Phone Calls $6,940 Task 15: Project Management $13,680
Total FCS Professional Labor $311,520
Total Direct Costs
Reprographics, Mileage, Deliveries, etc. $4,620
Contingency (5%) $15,807
Total FCS Professional Fee $331,947

52 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Prior to commencement of the Services, Consultant shall take out and maintain at its own expense the insurance coverage required by this Exhibit C. Consultant shall cause any subcontractor with whom Consultant contracts for the performance of Services pursuant to this Agreement to take out and maintain equivalent insurance coverage. Said insurance shall be maintained at all times during Consultant’s performance of Services under this Agreement, and for any additional period specified herein. All insurance shall be placed with insurance companies that are licensed and admitted to conduct business in the State of California and are rated at a minimum with an "A:VII" by A.M. Best Company, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.

a. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain the following types of insurance with limits no less than specified:

(i) Professional Liability Insurance (Errors and Omissions) in an amount not less than $2,000,000.00 per occurrence or claim and $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Said insurance shall be maintained for an additional period of five years following the earlier of completion of Consultant’s Services under this Agreement or termination of this Agreement.

(ii) General Liability Insurance (including operations, products and completed operations coverages) in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

(iii) Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California.

(iv) Automobile Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

(v) Umbrella or Excess Liability. In the event Consultant purchases an Umbrella or Excess insurance policy(ies) to meet the “Minimum Limits of Insurance,” this insurance policy(ies) shall “follow form” and afford no less coverage than the primary insurance policy(ies). In addition, such Umbrella or Excess insurance policy(ies) shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.

If Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City shall be entitled to coverage at the higher limits maintained.

b. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

(i) The City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as insured's with respect to liability arising out of automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by or on behalf of the Consultant; and with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.

General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33 or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).

53 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

(ii) For any claims related to the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.

(iii) Each insurance policy required by this section shall be endorsed to state that the City shall receive written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the cancellation, non-renewal, or material modification of the coverages required herein.

(iv) Consultant grants to the City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

(v) Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Clovis Risk Services. The City may require the Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower deductible or retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.

c. Evidence of Coverage. Consultant shall deliver to City written evidence of the above insurance coverages, including the required endorsements prior to commencing Services under this Agreement; and the production of such written evidence shall be an express condition precedent, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, to Consultant's right to be paid any compensation under this Agreement. City's failure, at any time, to object to Consultant's failure to provide the specified insurance or written evidence thereof (either as to the type or amount of such insurance), shall not be deemed a waiver of City's right to insist upon such insurance later.

d. Maintenance of Insurance. If Consultant fails to furnish and maintain the insurance required by this section, City may (but is not required to) purchase such insurance on behalf of Consultant, and the Consultant shall pay the cost thereof to City upon demand, and City shall furnish Consultant with any information needed to obtain such insurance. Moreover, at its discretion, City may pay for such insurance with funds otherwise due Consultant under this Agreement.

e. Subcontractors. If the Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the work to be performed in this Agreement, the Consultant shall cover the subcontractor, and/or require each subcontractor to adhere to all the requirements contained herein. Similarly, any cancellation, lapse, reduction or change of subcontractor’s insurance shall have the same impact as described above.

f. Special Risks or Circumstances. The City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

g. Indemnity and Defense. Except as otherwise expressly provided, the insurance requirements in this section shall not in any way limit, in either scope or amount, the indemnity and defense obligations separately owed by Consultant to City under this Agreement. 54 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

EXHIBIT D

SIGNING AUTHORITY

55 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services Department
DATE: February 4, 2025
SUBJECT: Planning and Development Services - Approval – Res. 2 5-___, Amending the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) Schedule of Drainage Costs and Fees for 2025-2026.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Res. 25-___

2. FMFCD Fee Adoption Letter

3. FMFCD Board of Directors Memorandum

4. Amended FMFCD Resolution

RECOMMENDATION
For the City Council to approve Res. 2 5-___, amending the FMFCD Storm Drainage per -acre costs and fees for 2025-2026.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 1961, the Cities of Fresno and Clovis and the County of Fresno adopted, as an element of the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan Area General Plan, a Storm Drainage Master Plan prepared by the Flood Control District for the metropolitan area. In 1969, these agencies adopted virtually identical drainage fee ordinances to provide for the funding of planned d rainage facilities concurrently with development activity which created the need for such facilities.

The local drainage plan shows the drainage area boundaries. Also shown are proposed and existing master plan facilities in each watershed area.

The rate structure associated with each master plan drainage area is based on the total estimated cost of the urban drainage system including land, improvements and any engineering required to serve the subject area. The total cost is divided into the total land a rea using appropriate proportionate ratios (related to storm runoff characteristics) between the various contributing/benefiting land uses.

This year’s update includes fee adjustments in certain drainage areas, zones, and surcharges within the City of Clovis (AQ, BC, BT, BY2, DL, DM, DO, DQ, 1G, 3G, 7C, 7D, 7H, Zone 2, Zone 56 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
3, surcharge fees for BX, 7D and DO) due to unit cost updates. This year’s update includes certain drainage areas (CL and DP) that did not see any fee adjustments.

The drainage fees pa id pursuant to the ordinance are deposited into a separate trust account.

The monies are not commingled with District general funds, are not used to fund any administration, operations, or maintenance costs, and must be expended within the drainage area in which they are paid.

The fee ordinance, enacted under the authority of the State Subdivision Map Act, requires the identification of the estimated or actual cost of the planned facilities through the adoption of a resolution. Because the fees are based on the cost of facilities, the resolution serves also as the schedule of fees.

The Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District consists of three zones. Zone 3 generally includes the core area of the City of Clovis. Zone 2 is mostly in the City of Fresno, e xcept for some portions of Drainage Areas “Q” and “S”, which are predominately within Clovis. Zone 1 includes all the areas within the District’s jurisdiction that are not in Zone 2 or Zone 3.

Attachment B of Attachment 1 lists the proposed drainage fee a djustments. City staff has had the opportunity to review the proposed adjustments with FMFCD staff and believes the adjustments are supported by the recently completed cost studies. District staff has indicated that the District contacted the Building Industry Association in reviewing the proposed drainage fee update.

Government Code, Sections 66016.5(a)(5)(A) and (B)
AB602 states that if an agency conducts an impact fee nexus study and it is adopted after July 1, 2022, the agency must either “calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units of the development” or make the following findings:
(i) An explanation as to why square footage is not appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on housing development project.
(ii) An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development. (iii) That other policies in the fee structure support smalle r developments, or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.

The District has made the findings as required by AB602, which were approved by their Counsel, their Board of Directors. A copy of the request by District staff to their Board of Directors is included as Attachment 3. A copy of the District’s Amended Resolution as approved by their Board of Directors is included as Attachment 4.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

57 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
In accordance with the District’s drainage fee ordinance, the District’s fee schedule is to be adjusted annually, or as warranted. This year the update was based upon examination of all drainage systems and their related costs and fee schedules.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Adopt and implement the 2025-2026 FMFCD Drainage Fees for local drainage fees.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

Prepared by: Tara West, Engineering Technician

Reviewed by: City Manager AH

58 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS

AMENDING THE STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL MASTER PLAN AND

ADOPTING THE DRAINAGE FEES AND COSTS FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN

THE JOINT AREA OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS, CALIFORNIA AND THE FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (2025-2026)

WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Clovis has enacted Chapter 7, Title 8 of the Clovis Municipal Code, which ordinance is hereby incorporated herein by this reference, creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging fees for the construction of planned local storm drainage facilities; and

WHEREAS, an amended Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map ( see Attachment A labeled as Exhibit “A” hereto) specifying public faci lities and improvements, existing and proposed, which are necessary to provide drainage service and flood control within the respective local drainage areas specified therein has been presented to the Council of the City of Clovis; and

WHEREAS, a study ha s been conducted of the impacts of contemplated future development on the existing storm drainage services and facilities in the local drainage areas of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (“District”) and the City of Clovis (“City”) listed in Attachment B labeled as Exhibit “B” attached hereto, along with an analysis of new, improved or expanded public facilities, the estimated costs of those improvements, and the schedule of per gross acre fees calculated to raise the sum of money necessary to pay the estimated total cost of said local drainage facilities in said local drainage areas; and

WHEREAS, this study was available at the District's office for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public meeting and notice was given in compliance with the requirements therefore, and

WHEREAS, a public meeting was held pursuant to the public notice cited herein at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Council of the City of Clovis; and

WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Clovis finds as follows:

A. The purpose of said fees is to finance facilities within the City and District required for the removal of surface and storm waters attributable to development; to obviate the menace to the public health, safety and welfare arising from inadequate provision for removal of surface and storm waters occurring as the result of development of property; to prevent deterioration of property values and impairment of conditions making for desirable residential, commercial or industrial development, as the case may be, which would result from the failure to construct 59 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
planned local drainage facilities relative to development of property; and to prevent deterioration of public streets and other public facilities which would result from failure to construct planned local drainage facilities concurrently with development.

B. The fees adopted hereby and collected pursuant to Chapter 7, Title 8 of the Clovis Municipal Code and this Resolution are to be used to finance only the public facilities shown on Exhibit “A” hereto within each of the respective local drainage areas identified in Exhibit “B” hereto;
C. After considering said Map and said study and analysis prepared by the District, entitled “Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan”, and that prepared by the C ity Planning Department entitled “Clovis General Plan,” and the various community and specific plans of the City; and the information and testimony received at this public hearing, the Council of the City of Clovis approves said Map and said study, and inc orporates such herein. The Council further finds that all development in the subject area will generate the need, as described in this recital, for storm drainage facilities therein, and generates an unmet need for storm drainage facilities and services within the impacted area; D. There is a need in this described impact area for storm drainage facilities which have not been constructed or have been constructed; said facilities have been called for in, or are consistent with, the City’s General Plan. Development will contribute its fair share towards these facility costs in those local drainage areas listed in Exhibit “B” through payment of the respective drainage fees set forth therein;
E. The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reason able relationship between the need for the described public facilities and the impacts of the types of development as described in Exhibit “A” and “B” for which the corresponding fee set forth in Exhibit “B” is charged. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of said fee and the development of the lands in the service area for which the fee is charged, as these reasonable relationships or nexuses are described in more detail in the study and Map referred to above; F. The Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and the storm drainage fees set forth in Exhibit “B”, as adopted by Paragraphs 2 and 3 herein below, revise the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan, are in conformity with the City’s General Pla n and are in compliance with Section 66483 of the California Government Code.

G. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit “B” are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities and the fee schedule set forth therein is based on said estimates and is to generate fees from development which will not exceed the total of these costs.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Clovis do as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct, and this Council so finds and determines.

2. The Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan is hereby amended to include that Storm Drain and Flood Control Master Plan Map attached hereto as Exhibit “A” as supported by Exhibit “B”.

3. The schedule of drainage fees for those respective local drainage areas listed in Exhibit “B” hereto is hereby adopted as set forth in said Exhibit “B”. The District shall prepare, and provide to the City, a 2025-2026 schedule of drainage fees for each of its local drainage areas, which shall include the fees adopted hereby. Fees shall be paid in 60 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinances according to said 2025-2026 drainage fee schedule.

4. The fee shall be solely used to pay: (a) costs related to the design, administration and construction of the described public storm water facilities; (b) for reimbursing the District for the development's fair share of those costs incurred by the District in the design and construction of the described public storm water facilities; or (c) to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities in each service area where those facilities were beyond that needed to mitigate the impacts of the other developers' project or projects and where reimbursement is provided for in the applicable Drainage Fee Ordinance or the Development Impact Fee Ordinance.

5. The District, pursuant to Chapter 7 of Title 8 of the Municipal Code, shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements for which this fee is charged, the continued or expanded need therefore, and the reasonable relationship between such facility needs and the varying types and development. The Manager shall report the findings to the City Council and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed.

6. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66022, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Resolution shall be brought within 120 days of the effective date hereof, which shall be 60 days after the date of adoption hereof. Administrative appeal is a mandatory prerequisite to any such judicial action or proceeding. Such appeal shall be made in writing to the Director of Public Works of the City of Clovis. Such appeal must be made within 60 days after the effective date hereof.

The Director shall set the matter for hearing, conduct the hearing and render a decision within 40 days after such appeal is filed.

7. The Ordinance of the City of Clovis has an administrative mechanism whereby a property owner who seeks to develop property within the boundaries of the City of Clovis and the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District can challenge the fees imposed thereunder only by first paying said fees under protest. Developers of property within the City of Clovis and the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District shall adhere to the applicable ordinance of the City of Clovis under which it is required that drainage fees must be paid before development is allowed, and that such fee may be paid under protest.

* * * * *

61 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on February 4, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:

______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk

62 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Attachment A
63 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
2025 DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE
City of Clovis
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
Note: The information provided herein is in accordance with California Government Code Section 66016.5(a)(5)(B) and is subject to the findings adopted per Resolution No. 2024-1047. This disclaimer pertains specifically to the support expressed for the continuation of District Policies related to the calculation and imposition of residential development impact fees on a per-gross-acre basis. 1 of 8
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Attachment B
64 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
2 of 8
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
City of Clovis
65 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
AQ

BASIN
$2,300
$2,620
$3,290
$3,930
$4,600
$4,920
$5,170
$5,420
$5,420
$6,070
$7,380
$10,730
$11,490
$12,310
$4,453,130
PIPE
$6,480
$7,320
$9,720
$10,560
$11,470
$11,920
$12,310
$12,630
$12,630
$13,540
$14,440
$16,780
$17,750
$18,720
$8,740,280
TOTAL
$8,780
$9,940
$13,010
$14,490
$16,070
$16,840
$17,480
$18,050
$18,050
$19,610
$21,820
$27,510
$29,240
$31,030
$13,193,410
BC

BASIN
$1,950
$2,230
$2,800
$3,340
$3,910
$4,180
$4,400
$4,610
$4,610
$5,160
$6,270
$9,130
$9,770
$10,480
$5,395,560
PIPE
$3,560
$4,030
$5,340
$5,810
$6,310
$6,560
$6,770
$6,950
$6,950
$7,450
$7,950
$9,230
$9,760
$10,300
$7,213,140
TOTAL
$5,510
$6,260
$8,140
$9,150
$10,220
$10,740
$11,170
$11,560
$11,560
$12,610
$14,220
$18,360
$19,530
$20,780
$12,608,700
BT

BASIN
$2,520
$2,880
$3,610
$4,310
$5,050
$5,400
$5,680
$5,950
$5,950
$6,660
$8,100
$11,780
$12,620
$13,520
$5,241,440
PIPE
$5,640
$6,370
$8,450
$9,190
$9,980
$10,370
$10,710
$10,990
$10,990
$11,780
$12,570
$14,600
$15,440
$16,290
$10,332,910
TOTAL
$8,160
$9,250
$12,060
$13,500
$15,030
$15,770
$16,390
$16,940
$16,940
$18,440
$20,670
$26,380
$28,060
$29,810
$15,574,350
BU

BASIN
$670
$760
$960
$1,150
$1,340
$1,440
$1,510
$1,580
$1,580
$1,770
$2,150
$3,130
$3,350
$3,600
$3,014,950
PIPE
$2,490
$2,810
$3,730
$4,060
$4,400
$4,580
$4,730
$4,850
$4,850
$5,200
$5,550
$6,440
$6,820
$7,190
$6,553,900
TOTAL
$3,160
$3,570
$4,690
$5,210
$5,740
$6,020
$6,240
$6,430
$6,430
$6,970
$7,700
$9,570
$10,170
$10,790
$9,568,850
BW

BASIN
$970
$1,110
$1,390
$1,660
$1,940
$2,080
$2,190
$2,300
$2,300
$2,570
$3,120
$4,540
$4,860
$5,210
$1,211,930
PIPE
$1,090
$1,240
$1,640
$1,780
$1,940
$2,010
$2,080
$2,130
$2,130
$2,290
$2,440
$2,830
$3,000
$3,160
$1,082,900
TOTAL
$2,060
$2,350
$3,030
$3,440
$3,880
$4,090
$4,270
$4,430
$4,430
$4,860
$5,560
$7,370
$7,860
$8,370
$2,294,830
BX

BASIN
$1,640
$1,870
$2,340
$2,800
$3,280
$3,500
$3,680
$3,860
$3,860
$4,320
$5,260
$7,650
$8,190
$8,780
$6,651,750
PIPE
$3,210
$3,630
$4,810
$5,230
$5,680
$5,900
$6,100
$6,260
$6,260
$6,710
$7,160
$8,310
$8,790
$9,270
$10,655,080
TOTAL
$4,850
$5,500
$7,150
$8,030
$8,960
$9,400
$9,780
$10,120
$10,120
$11,030
$12,420
$15,960
$16,980
$18,050
$17,306,830
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n No. 2017-864 A
mended 2018-908,
2020-958, 2021-
979, 2022-1009.

BY2

BASIN
$1,940
$2,220
$2,780
$3,330
$3,890
$4,160
$4,380
$4,590
$4,590
$5,130
$6,240
$9,080
$9,720
$10,420
$4,600,910
PIPE
$9,230
$10,430
$13,850
$15,040
$16,340
$16,980
$17,540
$18,000
$18,000
$19,290
$20,580
$23,910
$25,290
$26,670
$18,256,030
TOTAL
$11,170
$12,650
$16,630
$18,370
$20,230
$21,140
$21,920
$22,590
$22,590
$24,420
$26,820
$32,990
$35,010
$37,090
$22,856,940
CL

BASIN
$880
$1,010
$1,260
$1,510
$1,770
$1,890
$1,990
$2,090
$2,090
$2,330
$2,840
$4,130
$4,420
$4,740
$2,320,120
PIPE
$1,190
$1,350
$1,790
$1,940
$2,110
$2,200
$2,270
$2,330
$2,330
$2,490
$2,660
$3,090
$3,270
$3,450
$2,269,940
TOTAL
$2,070
$2,360
$3,050
$3,450
$3,880
$4,090
$4,260
$4,420
$4,420
$4,820
$5,500
$7,220
$7,690
$8,190
$4,590,060
CZ

BASIN
$560
$640
$800
$960
$1,120
$1,200
$1,260
$1,320
$1,320
$1,480
$1,790
$2,610
$2,790
$3,000
$1,551,490
PIPE
$1,250
$1,420
$1,880
$2,040
$2,220
$2,310
$2,380
$2,450
$2,450
$2,620
$2,800
$3,250
$3,440
$3,620
$2,788,260
TOTAL
$1,810
$2,060
$2,680
$3,000
$3,340
$3,510
$3,640
$3,770
$3,770
$4,100
$4,590
$5,860
$6,230
$6,620
$4,339,750
DL

BASIN
$3,340
$3,810
$4,780
$5,710
$6,680
$7,150
$7,510
$7,880
$7,880
$8,820
$10,720
$15,600
$16,700
$17,900
$3,888,100
PIPE
$6,210
$7,020
$9,320
$10,120
$10,990
$11,430
$11,800
$12,110
$12,110
$12,980
$13,850
$16,090
$17,020
$17,950
$5,079,920
TOTAL
$9,550
$10,830
$14,100
$15,830
$17,670
$18,580
$19,310
$19,990
$19,990
$21,800
$24,570
$31,690
$33,720
$35,850
$8,968,020
DM

BASIN
$2,400
$2,740
$3,430
$4,110
$4,800
$5,140
$5,400
$5,670
$5,670
$6,340
$7,710
$11,210
$12,010
$12,870
$5,877,980
PIPE
$8,680
$9,800
$13,010
$14,140
$15,360
$15,960
$16,480
$16,920
$16,920
$18,130
$19,350
$22,470
$23,770
$25,070
$17,511,310
TOTAL
$11,080
$12,540
$16,440
$18,250
$20,160
$21,100
$21,880
$22,590
$22,590
$24,470
$27,060
$33,680
$35,780
$37,940
$23,389,290
DO

BASIN
$2,110
$2,410
$3,020
$3,610
$4,220
$4,520
$4,750
$4,980
$4,980
$5,570
$6,770
$9,850
$10,550
$11,310
$6,474,660
PIPE
$3,050
$3,450
$4,580
$4,980
$5,410
$5,620
$5,800
$5,960
$5,960
$6,380
$6,810
$7,910
$8,370
$8,830
$7,251,850
TOTAL
$5,160
$5,860
$7,600
$8,590
$9,630
$10,140
$10,550
$10,940
$10,940
$11,950
$13,580
$17,760
$18,920
$20,140
$13,726,510
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n No. 2007-522 A
mended 2014-806,
2018-887, 2018-
908 and Board Re
solution No. 202
0-959 Amended 20
21-979 , 2022-10

09. DP

BASIN
$2,150
$2,450
$3,080
$3,680
$4,300
$4,600
$4,840
$5,080
$5,080
$5,680
$6,900
$10,040
$10,750
$11,530
$8,091,790
PIPE
$6,630
$7,490
$9,940
$10,800
$11,730
$12,200
$12,590
$12,930
$12,930
$13,850
$14,780
$17,170
$18,160
$19,160
$18,509,360
TOTAL
$8,780
$9,940
$13,020
$14,480
$16,030
$16,800
$17,430
$18,010
$18,010
$19,530
$21,680
$27,210
$28,910
$30,690
$26,601,150
3 of 8
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
City of Clovis
66 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
DQ

BASIN
$7,350
$8,380
$10,510
$12,570
$14,700
$15,730
$16,530
$17,340
$17,340
$19,400
$23,590
$34,320
$36,740
$39,390
$6,040,260
PIPE
$6,790
$7,670
$10,190
$11,070
$12,020
$12,500
$12,900
$13,240
$13,240
$14,190
$15,150
$17,590
$18,610
$19,630
$4,805,190
TOTAL
$14,140
$16,050
$20,700
$23,640
$26,720
$28,230
$29,430
$30,580
$30,580
$33,590
$38,740
$51,910
$55,350
$59,020
$10,845,450
1G

BASIN
$1,270
$1,440
$1,810
$2,170
$2,530
$2,710
$2,850
$2,990
$2,990
$3,340
$4,060
$5,910
$6,330
$6,790
$1,872,020
PIPE
$1,200
$1,350
$1,800
$1,950
$2,120
$2,200
$2,270
$2,330
$2,330
$2,500
$2,670
$3,100
$3,280
$3,460
$1,543,320
TOTAL
$2,470
$2,790
$3,610
$4,120
$4,650
$4,910
$5,120
$5,320
$5,320
$5,840
$6,730
$9,010
$9,610
$10,250
$3,415,340
3G

BASIN
$2,040
$2,330
$2,920
$3,490
$4,080
$4,370
$4,590
$4,820
$4,820
$5,390
$6,550
$9,530
$10,200
$10,940
$4,368,720
PIPE
$2,570
$2,910
$3,860
$4,190
$4,550
$4,730
$4,890
$5,010
$5,010
$5,370
$5,730
$6,660
$7,050
$7,430
$4,640,440
TOTAL
$4,610
$5,240
$6,780
$7,680
$8,630
$9,100
$9,480
$9,830
$9,830
$10,760
$12,280
$16,190
$17,250
$18,370
$9,009,160
7C

BASIN
$2,030
$2,310
$2,900
$3,460
$4,050
$4,340
$4,560
$4,780
$4,780
$5,350
$6,500
$9,460
$10,130
$10,860
$3,969,560
PIPE
$1,230
$1,390
$1,850
$2,010
$2,180
$2,270
$2,340
$2,400
$2,400
$2,570
$2,750
$3,190
$3,370
$3,560
$1,734,900
TOTAL
$3,260
$3,700
$4,750
$5,470
$6,230
$6,610
$6,900
$7,180
$7,180
$7,920
$9,250
$12,650
$13,500
$14,420
$5,704,460
7D

BASIN
$2,540
$2,900
$3,630
$4,350
$5,080
$5,440
$5,720
$6,000
$6,000
$6,710
$8,160
$11,870
$12,710
$13,620
$4,456,650
PIPE
$1,850
$2,090
$2,770
$3,010
$3,270
$3,400
$3,510
$3,610
$3,610
$3,870
$4,120
$4,790
$5,070
$5,350
$2,243,900
TOTAL
$4,390
$4,990
$6,400
$7,360
$8,350
$8,840
$9,230
$9,610
$9,610
$10,580
$12,280
$16,660
$17,780
$18,970
$6,700,550
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n No. 2005-480 A
mended 2018-908
& 2021-979.
7H

BASIN
$3,360
$3,830
$4,800
$5,740
$6,720
$7,190
$7,560
$7,920
$7,920
$8,860
$10,780
$15,680
$16,790
$18,000
$7,792,210
PIPE
$5,810
$6,570
$8,720
$9,480
$10,290
$10,700
$11,050
$11,340
$11,340
$12,150
$12,970
$15,060
$15,930
$16,800
$9,433,700
TOTAL
$9,170
$10,400
$13,520
$15,220
$17,010
$17,890
$18,610
$19,260
$19,260
$21,010
$23,750
$30,740
$32,720
$34,800
$17,225,910
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n No. 2005-480 A
mended 2018-908
& 2021-979.
4 of 8
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
City of Clovis
67 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total
OO $3,149,221 $899,643 $4,048,864
PP $2,279,786 $1,232,767 $3,512,553
RR $5,672,640 $18,578,852 $24,251,492
SS $3,200,285 $4,191,719 $7,392,004
TT $2,673,474 $1,843,428 $4,516,902
UU1 $747,282 $1,383,868 $2,131,150
UU2 $1,815,483 $1,664,639 $3,480,122
UU3 $4,297,237 $11,436,261 $15,733,498
VV $307,124 $116,961 $424,085
WW $291,653 $360,044 $651,697
XX $1,025,092 $2,177,108 $3,202,200
ZZ $2,995,111 $3,415,154 $6,410,265
Planned Local Drainage Areas: Zone 2
Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total
X $2,257,718 $449,072 $2,706,790
Y $1,714,229 $2,274,773 $3,989,002
Z $1,126,945 $2,543,686 $3,670,631 **
AA $1,007,845 $1,444,258 $2,452,103
BB $817,452 $822,774 $1,640,226
CC $1,131,025 $2,087,079 $3,218,104
CO2 $947,253 $1,742,103 $2,689,356
DD $2,683,022 $7,744,571 $10,427,593
EE $754,118 $3,373,882 $4,128,000
FF $1,442,268 $9,623,346 $11,065,614
GG $3,032,358 $1,657,509 $4,689,867
HH $5,862,906 $7,672,820 $13,535,726
II1 $5,984,056 $17,011,910 $22,995,966
II2 $9,806,468 $1,389,416 $11,195,884
II3 $2,269,686 $1,880,276 $4,149,962
II4 $2,643,383 $1,159,909 $3,803,292
JJ $2,526,157 $3,874,763 $6,400,920
KK $2,541,765 $1,537,976 $4,079,741
LL $3,032,488 $3,884,297 $6,916,785
MM $611,890 $950,198 $1,562,088
Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total
A $2,653,480 $2,140,187 $4,793,667
B $1,296,438 $142,170 $1,438,608
C $479,953 $317,414 $797,367
D $801,395 $689,353 $1,490,748
E $987,771 $228,063 $1,215,834
F $327,718 $302,016 $629,734
G $1,688,391 $157,007 $1,845,398
H $99,858 $214,682 $314,540
I $227,828 $248,025 $475,853
J $1,880,431 $510,964 $2,391,395
K $1,312,067 $685,069 $1,997,136
L $761,681 $494,850 $1,256,531
M $967,464 $265,529 $1,232,993
N $535,530 $436,070 $971,600
O $1,227,150 $190,138 $1,417,288
P $1,027,751 $235,116 $1,262,867
T $2,128,728 $2,752,032 $4,880,760
U $1,890,650 $697,216 $2,587,866
V $976,218 $1,726,395 $2,702,613
W $2,211,300 $3,693,138 $5,904,438 *
W * Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution No. 885-BPBR.

Z ** Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution Nos. 1227, 1265, 1268, 1386.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 2: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O A1, A2, RR R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40% R-1 45% R-1 50% R-2, M-H R-3 R-4, T-P M-1, M-2, M-3, C-R, M-1-P, S-L
C-P, C-M, R-P C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
Zone 2 BASIN $920 $1,050 $1,320 $1,580 $1,850 $1,980 $2,080 $2,180 $2,180 $2,440 $2,970 $4,320 $4,620 $4,950 $104,129,222 PIPE $1,730 $1,950 $2,590 $2,820 $3,060 $3,180 $3,280 $3,370 $3,370 $3,610 $3,850 $4,470 $4,730 $4,990 $136,550,496 TOTAL $2,650 $3,000 $3,910 $4,400 $4,910 $5,160 $5,360 $5,550 $5,550 $6,050 $6,820 $8,790 $9,350 $9,940 $240,679,718 5 of 82025 FMFCD3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025City of Clovis
68 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Planned Local Drainage Areas: Zone 3
Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total
Q $436,210 $420,268 $856,478
S $1,287,650 $2,428,339 $3,715,989
1E $2,200,042 $952,712 $3,152,754
2D $840,485 $1,591,200 $2,431,685
3A $1,511,791 $1,014,241 $2,526,032
3D $1,437,873 $1,032,196 $2,470,069
3F $1,139,750 $1,224,524 $2,364,274
4B $2,179,796 $1,124,616 $3,304,412
4C $1,678,770 $2,386,729 $4,065,499
4D $3,710,620 $1,165,436 $4,876,056
4E $4,232,706 $2,241,337 $6,474,043
5B/5C $5,019,048 $2,282,376 $7,301,424
5F $1,658,490 $1,530,399 $3,188,889
6D $1,510,672 $1,565,845 $3,076,517
Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 3: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O A1, A2, RR R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40% R-1 45% R-1 50% R-2, M-H R-3 R-4, T-P M-1, M-2, M-3, C-R, M-1-P, S-L
C-P, C-M, R-P C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
Zone 3 BASIN $1,560 $1,780 $2,230 $2,670 $3,120 $3,340 $3,520 $3,690 $3,690 $4,120 $5,020 $7,300 $7,810 $8,370 $28,843,903 PIPE $1,590 $1,790 $2,380 $2,590 $2,810 $2,920 $3,010 $3,090 $3,090 $3,320 $3,540 $4,110 $4,350 $4,590 $20,960,218 TOTAL $3,150 $3,570 $4,610 $5,260 $5,930 $6,260 $6,530 $6,780 $6,780 $7,440 $8,560 $11,410 $12,160 $12,960 $49,804,121 6 of 82025 FMFCD3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025City of Clovis
69 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR SURCHARGE AREAS: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
W

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$11,075
-
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 885-BPBR

Z

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$1,970
$2,110
$2,250
$2,615
$5,380
$2,915
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1386

BX

TOTAL
-
$270
$360
$390
$430
$445
$445
$445
$470
$510
$540
$630
$660
$700
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2008-590

BX

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$18,100
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2017-884

CM

TOTAL
$90
$105
$135
$145
$160
$165
$165
$165
$175
$185
$200
$235
$485
$260
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1228

CN

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$2,200
$2,395
$2,695
$3,465
$3,690
$3,925
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1422

DE

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
$790
$790
$790
$840
$900
-
$1,120
$1,250
$1,250
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2006-486

DN

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
$12,460
$12,860
$13,200
$13,200
-
-
-
-
$19,570
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2017-884

DO

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$4,820
$4,820
$5,170
$5,170
-
$6,770
$7,140
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2018-887

DO

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$5,280
$5,280
-
-
$7,300
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2020-959

7D

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$7,307
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2005-480

7H

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$7,307
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2005-480

7 of 8
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
City of Clovis
70 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
8 of 8
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
City of Clovis
71 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
Capturing Stormwater since 1956
k:\letters\drainage fee letters\clovis\2025 fee adoption ltr-city clovis new.docx 5469 E. Olive Avenue • Fresno, CA 93727 • (559) 456-3292 • FAX (559) 456-3194 www.fresnofloodcontrol.org
File 140.3143
210.81

December 30, 2024

Mr. Thad Avery, City Engineer
City of Clovis
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612

Dear Mr. Avery,

Adoption of Resolution Confirming
2025 Schedule of Drainage Costs and Fees

The drainage ordinances of the District, Cities, and County are, as required by Section 66483 of the Government Code, predicated upon adoption of a Resolution, which identifies the actual (or estimated) cost of the planned drainage facilities. Because the development fees imposed pursuant to the Code Section are the same as these costs, the same Resolution serves as the Schedule of Fees.

On December 11, 2024, the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District conducted the prescribed noticed public hearing, in accordance with Government Code Section 6062a, and subsequently approved and adopted the subject schedule of costs. The District provides the required noticing of public hearing to effect the drainage fee update in accordance with law and has in the past suggested that the City may possibly rely on the District notice and hearing, in that they effect the same drainage fee cost schedule, or the City may wish to provide an additional ten (10) day noticing prior to action if it disagrees with this interpretation. No objection to the drainage fee update was presented at the District’s hearing.

The District used the GIS automated drainage fee program for this years cost study, as it calculates drainage fees immediately upon input of accounting data and GIS information. The program provides a thorough analysis of the cost estimates, unit prices f or drainage facilities and recent construction activity. This year’s study used new unit prices for drainage facilities based on recent construction activity and other system modifications due to studies performed throughout the year. With this information, the automated program performed a complete re- computation to evaluate this year’s fee schedule.

The District strives to adopt the fees at the end of the year so they become effective beginning in March of each year in accordance with the Ordinance. Section 66017 of the Government Code requires a 60-day period before the rates take effect. Therefore, the drainage fees, with no further changes in the rates become effective on March 1, 2025 based on the District’s adoption of the Resolution on December 11, 2024. The District has determined that the 2025 Drainage Fees align with the requirements outlined in AB 602 Section 66016.5(a)(5)(B) of the Government Code, as indicated by the findings adopted in said Resolution.

Attachment 2
72 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Mr. Thad Avery
Adoption of Resolution Confirming
Schedule of Drainage Costs and Fees
December 30, 2024

k:\letters\drainage fee letters\clovis\2025 fee adoption ltr-city clovis new.docx It is requested that the attached Resolution identifying drainage costs and fees, as provided by the Drainage Fee Ordinance of the City of Clovis, be presented to the City of Clovis Council for adoption at the earliest possible date. To assist in expediting this matter, District staff has attached a Draft Resolution, the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map (Exhibit “A”) and the 2025 Drainage Fee Schedule which should be included in Clovis’ Resolution to Council. Also attached is the December 11, 2024 District Board Memorandum, which provides a discussion regarding the adoption of the 2025 Drainage Fee Schedule.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated. If additional information is needed, please contact us.

Sincerely,

Denise Wade
Master Plan Special Projects Manager

DW/lrl

Enclosure(s)

c: John Holt, City of Clovis
Darren Rose, Building Industry Association
73 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
2025 DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING MEMORANDUM
Attachment 3
74 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

MEMORANDUM

F R E S N O M E T R O P O L I T A N F L O O D C O N T R O L D I S T R I C T Capturing Stormwater since 1956.

File 140.3123, 140.3133, 140.3143

BOARD MEETING: December 11, 2024
AGENDA ITEM NO.: 7.A.

FROM:

SUBJECT: Storm Drainage Master Plan and Drainage Fee Schedule Update: Adoption of Resolution Amending the Storm
Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan and Amending the Schedule of Drainage Fees, Surcharges, and Costs for Local Drainage Areas (2025 Rate Schedule)

Summary
Urban storm drainage systems are funded by the payment of drainage fees at the time of development. Fees in the original area of the District or core area of the City of Fresno (Zone 2) are calculated at a uniform rate by spreading the aggregate of each system's total cost to the entire original area. The core area of the City of Clovis (Zone 3) utilizes the same approach.

Zone 2 is unique in that the aggregate approach was intended to distribute the benefits of the long-term tax payments and early formation and subsidies via assessment districts. All other areas referred to as the "Full Cost" zone (Zone 1) are funded by spreading the individual system cost to its respective local drainage area. The zones are shown on the attached Exhibit No. 1.

Exhibit No. 2 depicts the proposed amendments to certain drainage and surcharge fee schedules for March 1, 2025 through February 28, 2026. Adoption of the attached resolution amending the Master Plan and amending the fee schedule in certain drainage areas is necessary to formally make changes to those drainage areas and increase the fee rate. The updated Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map (Exhibit A) is also attached for review and reference. A Public Hearing is required to increase drainage fee rates and the appropriate public notice regarding this Hearing was published in the Fresno Bee pursuant to the Government Code. Fee schedules are updated annually to become effective not less than sixty (60) days after adoption.

Zone 1
With respect to Zone 1, seventy-seven (77) drainage areas warrant a fee amendment.

Modification of system costs significant enough to justify a revision to the drainage fee schedules include increased unit prices for the following: (i) Master Plan pipe facilities - pipelines (including jacked pipe), manholes, inlets, outfalls; and (ii) Master Plan basin facilities - basin excavation, final grading, street paving arterial & local, reclaimed pump, sprinkler & turf, CEQA, and water capacity fee (Fresno). The drainage areas affected by the modifications are set forth in Exhibit No. 2, and list land use of the greatest acreage in each of the respective local drainage areas as representative of the adjustments or rate change. The comment column indicates the type of adjustment associated with the 2025 Drainage Fee Amendments.

Also, this year's study indicated that drainage fee rates for twenty-two (22) Zone 1 drainage areas remain the same or showed a slight decrease. Based upon previous staff reviews, it is normally recommended that downward adjustments not be made due to the anticipated drainage 75 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

BOARD MEETING: December 11, 2024
AGENDA ITEM NO.: 7.A.
fee revenue falling short of the total system costs within many of the full cost drainage areas. A decrease in the fee rate for Zone 1 areas must be supported by a fee audit for the specific area. The audit is necessary to evaluate the outcome of the total system costs to determine, ultimately, if the funding collected will be less or more than the cost to complete the full cost Zone 1 drainage systems. This year's audit does not support a decrease in the remaining Zone 1 areas. Staff will continually monitor these areas and report its findings to the Board should a decrease in fees be warranted in the future.

Zone 2 and Zone 3
Zone 2 and 3 areas warrant a fee adjustment due to unit cost updates and the percentage increase is shown in Exhibit No. 2.

Surcharge Areas
Review of the fee rates identified five (5) existing surcharge areas, Drainage Areas "7D" (RT Park), "BX" (RT Park), "DO" (Southeast Urban), "DO" (Loma Vista Community South), and "DN" (Copper River Ranch), that warranted fee adjustments (Exhibit No. 3). The fee increases in these areas resulted from unit cost updates and contract adjustments. Exhibit No. 3 also shows the per acre costs resulting from these surcharge fee adjustments.

The City of Clovis recently adopted their Master Development Fee Schedule amending certain provisions regarding District basins. The revision to the ordinance exempts District basins from fee obligations related to the water line, water grid main charge, and well charge. Staff has removed these items from the 2025 fee update for Clovis Zone 1 and Zone 3 drainage fee amendments.

Staff posted the 2025 Drainage Fee Amendments to the fee schedule on the District's website, circulated the proposed changes to the Building Industry Association (BIA) for comment, and informed the BIA of the public hearing date. Pipe and basin facilities unit cost changes to the fee schedule were also presented to the BIA at a regularly scheduled BIA/District liaison meeting on Thursday, November 21, 2024. It was requested that the BIA make formal comments on the proposal for this year's adjustments prior to the public hearing. No comments have been received at the writing of this memorandum. In the past, BIA has been non-committal and taken no position regarding drainage fee adjustments. Following the District's adoption of the 2025 amendments to the Drainage Fee Schedule, staff will request each of the local jurisdictional agencies adopt the amendments.

The adoption of fees is considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has evaluated the potential environmental impact of the adoption of these fees and has determined that the action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)(D). This section exempts the modification of fees collected by public agencies for the purpose of obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain service within existing service areas. Pursuant to Section 21080(b)(8)(D), staff recommends the Board incorporate findings in the record that the proposed amendments to the drainage fees are exempt from CEQA.

As part of the resolution adopting the fee schedule, staff has included specific findings in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act, California State Assembly Bill 602 - Section 66016.5(a)(5)(B) of the Government Code. These findings affirm that the fees are equitably distributed, considering the requirement to capture, manage, and store stormwater runoff based 76 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

BOARD MEETING: December 11, 2024
AGENDA ITEM NO.: 7.A.
on land use and anticipated impervious area. Recognizing that the benefit received is directly proportional to the quantity of runoff generated rather than the square footage or number of dwelling units, it is prudent for the District to maintain the existing method of fee calculation.

Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the following:

1. Adopt the attached Resolution updating the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map and amend the proposed cost and fee schedules as set forth therein.

2. Direct staff to transmit the map and fee schedule amendments to the City of Fresno, City of Clovis, and the County of Fresno for adoption.

3. Find that adoption of said Resolution that adopts fees are exempt from further CEQA assessment per provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)(D).

4. Find that adoption of said Resolution that adopts fees are in compliance with California State Assembly Bill 602 - Section 66016.5(a)(5)(B) of the Government Code.

Discussion
The proposed drainage fee amendments, shown in Exhibit No. 2, comply with the Government Code that requires the local agency to determine that the fees are fairly apportioned within the local drainage areas either on the basis of benefits conferred on the property proposed for subdivision or on the need for such facilities created by the proposed subdivision and development of other property within such areas. In Zones 1 through 3, fees are fairly apportioned based on the need to capture, manage, and store stormwater runoff as determined by land use and anticipated impervious area.

California State Assembly Bill 602 implies that agencies conduct an impact fee nexus study to base residential impact fees on the square footage of the proposed residential units or make specific findings to explain why other metrics are appropriate. Staff makes the following findings to use another measure instead of square footage as a basis to charge a fee: (1) the use of developed interior square footage to calculate the fee does not capture the impacts from impervious surfaces outside of the footprint of development, (2) the fee rate applied is based on the land use as determined by the City of Fresno, City of Clovis, and County of Fresno General Plans and such land used is associated with percent impervious, and (3) the District doesn't collect a fee for improvements under 1,000 square feet on developed or partially developed property, 'tiny homes' under 750 square feet, and development with additional improvements that are less than 25% of property developed prior to March 15, 1969.

Staff continually monitors system costs as improvements are constructed yearly. By monitoring system costs, staff can make the necessary adjustments to the drainage fee automation program, which immediately re-calculates the drainage fee schedules when new information is input into the accounting data and/or modifications are made to the GIS system. This process requires comparing actual contract unit costs with the current fee study unit costs and insight from building contractors within the metropolitan area. With the use of actual costs, the District can ensure the unit costs are current with the market and better re-coup funding for updated system costs without relying on the use of the General fund. While adjustments to drainage fees are generally considered only once each year pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance, the automated program allows for staff to view the effect on the future drainage fee rate schedule after any system modification.
77 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

BOARD MEETING: December 11, 2024
AGENDA ITEM NO.: 7.A.

To keep current with facility unit costs, the adjustments warranted for 2025 include an increase in the following: pipe with and without trench resurfacing (7%), jacked pipe (averaged 1%), manholes (34.1%), inlets (5.1%), outfalls (80.2%), basin excavation (10%), final grading (11.1%), street paving arterial (2.5%), street paving local (3.6%), proposed reclaimed pump (5%), existing reclaimed pump (5%), sprinkler and turf (31.2%), and City of Fresno water capacity fee (-1.1%).

Review of the fee rates identified five (5) existing surcharge areas in Drainage Areas "7D", "BX", "DO", and "DN" that warranted fee adjustments. The fee rate increases in these areas resulted from unit cost updates and contract adjustments.

The City of Clovis has adopted revisions to its development code that now considers storm drain basins owned by the District as public infrastructure. Therefore, basins are exempted from payment of Clovis Development Impact Fees for water lines, water grid main charges, and well charges. Staff has excluded these items from the drainage fee related to basin costs for all drainage areas located within Clovis Zone 1 and 3. The drainage areas impacted by the removal of the fees benefiting a cost savings are noted in Exhibit No. 2 as Clovis DIF Adjustment.

The 2025 drainage fee rate study reviews all drainage areas utilizing the adjusted unit costs and accounting data for existing facilities. The existing drainage ordinances require annual updating of the drainage system cost schedules. This process assures fees are based on actual costs, ensures equity among all fee payers, assures reimbursement of those incurring construction costs in excess of their proportionate cost share, and protects the general taxpayer from the need to pay development subsidies.

Pursuant to the Government Code, the fee increases become effective not less than sixty (60) days following adoption. Therefore, if adopted, the effective date of the drainage fee rate schedule would be March 1, 2025 in accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinance.

Respectfully submitted by:

Denise Wade, Master Plan Special Projects Manager

Attachments

1. Public Hearing Procedural Outline

2. Exhibit No. 1

3. Exhibit No. 2

4. Exhibit A

5. Exhibit No. 3

6. Resolution Amending Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan and Amending Schedule of Drainage Fees, Surcharges and Costs for Local Drainage Areas

78 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
ems\board\public hearing outline

PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURAL OUTLINE

1. Chair Opens Public Hearing

2. Staff Presents Staff Report

3. Discussion by Board Members

4. Chair Opens Hearing for Public Comment

5. There being no further Public Comment, Chair Closes
Hearing for Public Comment

6. Chair Refers Matter to Board
79 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
80 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Drainage Areas Within Zone 1
(Full Cost Areas)
Percent
Change
Majority Zone
Use Comments
1 “AB” (Marks and Palo Alto) +6.08 R-1-B Unit Cost Update 2 “AD” (Valentine and Bullard) +8.98 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 3 “AE” (Valentine and Barstow) +9.22 R-2 Unit Cost Update 4 “AF” (Valentine and Gettysburg) +6.59 C-2 Unit Cost Update 5 “AH” (Cornelia and Gettysburg) +4.93 M-1 Unit Cost Update 6 “AI” (Blythe and Belmont) +5.75 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 7 “AJ” (Polk and Ashlan) +5.24 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 8 “AK” (Polk and Shields) +6.75 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 9 “AL” (Brawley and Weldon) +5.91 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 10 “AN” (Cornelia and Hedges) +6.03 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 11 “AO” (Blythe and Belmont) +8.04 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 12 “AQ” (Willow and Perrin) +7.31 R-2 Unit Cost Update, Clovis DIF Adjustment 13 “AR” (Cornelia and Whites Bridge) +8.06 M-1 Unit Cost Update, Basin Update 14 “AS” (Valentine and California) +8.75 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update, Basin Update 15 “AU” (West and Annadale) +7.78 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 16 “AV” (Fig and Central) +6.73 M-3 Unit Cost Update
17 “AW1” (Orange and North) +4.75 M-3 Unit Cost Update
18 “AW2” (Cherry and North) +2.71 M-3 Unit Cost Update
19 “AY” (Cedar and Central) +5.50 M-3 Unit Cost Update
20 “AZ” (Chestnut and Muscat) +5.91 M-3 Unit Cost Update 21 “BC” (Willow and Teague) +4.37 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update, Clovis DIF Adjustment 22 “BD” (Willow and Vine) +6.48 M-1 Unit Cost Update
23 “BE” (Willow and Belgravia) +1.50 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 24 “BF” (Chestnut and Church) +7.22 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 25 “BG” (Peach and Annadale) +5.75 M-3 Unit Cost Update 26 “BH” (Clovis and Church) +7.13 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 27 “BJ” (Maple and Golden State) +8.67 M-3 Unit Cost Update 28 “BL” (Armstrong and Church) +6.43 C-1 Unit Cost Update 29 “BM” (Fowler and Butler) +4.80 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 30 “BP” (Sunnyside and Harvey) +7.88 M-1 Unit Cost Update 2025 DRAINAGE FEE AMENDMENTS
Exhibit No. 2

81 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Drainage Areas Within Zone 1
(Full Cost Areas)
Percent
Change
Majority Zone
Use Comments
2025 DRAINAGE FEE AMENDMENTS
31 “BQ” (Fowler and Belmont) +7.32 M-1 Unit Cost Update 32 “BR” (Clovis and Olive) +7.08 M-1 Unit Cost Update
33 “BS” (Fowler and Floradora) +3.48 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update, Basin Update 34 “BT” (Sunnyside and Nees) +3.34 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update, Clovis DIF Adjustment 35 “BU” (Clovis and Clinton) +6.93 M-1 Unit Cost Update 36 “BV” (Fowler and Shields) +4.45 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 37 “BY1” (Sunnyside and Behymer) +3.47 RR Unit Cost Update, Clovis DIF Adjustment 38 “BY2” (Sunnyside and Behymer) +3.27 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update, Clovis DIF Adjustment 39 “BZ” (Cedar and Copper) +3.26 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 40 “CD” (Garfield and Dakota) +6.26 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 41 “CE” (Maple and American) +8.23 M-3 Unit Cost Update, Basin Update 42 “CF” (Peach and Central) +7.06 M-3 Unit Cost Update
43 “CG” (Garfield and McKinley) +8.84 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update, Basin Update 44 “CH” (Bryan and McKinley) +8.42 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update, Basin Update 45 “CI” (Polk and Mckinley) +5.65 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 46 “CJ” (Grantland and Belmont) +8.48 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update, Basin Update 47 “CK” (Polk and Belmont) +5.97 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 48 “CM” (Cedar and Herndon) +2.21 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 49 “CN” (Fresno and Herndon) +1.44 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 50 “CO1” (Alluvial and Teilman) +4.37 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 51 “CP” (Marks and Jensen) +7.56 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 52 “CQ” (Walnut and North) +8.08 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 53 “CS” (Minnewawa and North) +7.94 M-1 Unit Cost Update 54 “CU” (Willow and North) +6.32 M-1 Unit Cost Update
55 “CV” (Willow and Central) +5.53 M-3 Unit Cost Update 56 “CW” (Fresno and Nees) +7.26 R-1-C Unit Cost Update
57 “CX” (Nees and Ninth) +2.33 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 58 “CY” (Cedar and Alluvial) +6.23 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 59 “DE” (Cedar and Copper) +5.09 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update 60 “DK” (Friant and Champlain) +4.44 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 61 “DL” (International and Minnewawa) +7.09 R-1-40%
Unit Cost Update, Basin Update,
Clovis DIF Adjustment
Exhibit No. 2

82 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Drainage Areas Within Zone 1
(Full Cost Areas)
Percent
Change
Majority Zone
Use Comments
2025 DRAINAGE FEE AMENDMENTS
62 “DM” (Peach and Copper) +6.19 R-1-40%
Unit Cost Update, Basin Update,
Clovis DIF Adjustment
63 “DN” (Friant and Willow) +6.72 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update, Basin Update 64 “DO” (Locan and Ashlan) +1.50 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update, Clovis DIF Adjustment 65 “DQ” (Leonard and Sierra) +3.52 R-1-40%
Unit Cost Update, Basin Update,
Clovis DIF Adjustment
66 “DS” (Leonard and Clinton) +6.28 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update, Basin Update 67 “EF” (Cornelia and Dante) +7.74 R-1 40% Unit Cost Update, Basin Update 68 “EI” (Weber and Spruce) +6.66 M-1 Unit Cost Update
69 “EJ” (Garfield and Sample) +8.40 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 70 “EK” (Bluff and Santa Fe) +0.93 R-1-C Unit Cost Update 71 “EL” (Barcus and Barstow) +2.08 M-1 Unit Cost Update 72 “EM” (Grantland and Barstow) +4.02 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 73 “EN” (Garfield and Gettysburg) +7.58 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 74 “EO” (Bryan and Dakota) +2.53 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 75 “NN” (Valentine and Church) +9.80 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update 76 “7D” (Fowler and FWY-168) +1.21 R-1-C Unit Cost Update, Clovis DIF Adjustment 77 “7H” (Temperance and Bullard) +8.36 R-1 40%
Unit Cost Update, Clovis DIF Adjustment,
Basin Update
Drainage Areas Within Zone 2 & 3
(Uniform Cost Areas)
Percent
Change
Majority Zone
Use Comments
1 ZONE 2 AREAS +3.61 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update, Basin Update 2 ZONE 3 AREAS +0.48 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update, Clovis DIF Adjustment Surcharge Areas
Percent
Change
Majority Zone
Use Comments
1 “7D/7H” (RT Park) +19.05 CP,C-M, R-P Unit Cost Update, Contract Adjustment 2 “BX” (RT Park) +8.32 C-P,C-M,R-P Unit Cost Update
3 “DN” (Copper River Ranch) +6.12 R-1-40% Unit Cost Update, Contract Adjustment 4 “DO” (Southeast Urban Area) +2.32 R-1-50% Unit Cost Update 5 “DO” (Loma Vista Comm. Center South) +5.36 C-1 Unit Cost Update, Contract Adjustment 2025 SURCHARGE FEE ADJUSTMENTS
Exhibit No. 2

83 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
84 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Exhibit A
85 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
2025 Surcharge Fee Summary Sheet
Drainage Areas "7D", "BX", "DN", and "DO"

ACREAGE
134.9

ACREAGE
102.7

ACREAGE
118.2

59.1 59.1

46.6 9.3

ACREAGE

32.9 176.9

25.0 97.8

11.9 115.1

ACREAGE

20.2 47.1
"7D"/"7H" (RT Park) 2025 Surcharge Rates

ZONING TOTAL
C-P, C-M, R-P 7,307$
R-3, R-4 5,280$
C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5, C-6, C-L, P 7,300$
C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5, C-6, C-L, P 7,140$
"DO" (Loma Vista Community Center South) 2025 Surcharge Rates

ZONING TOTAL
R-3, R-4 5,170$
C-P, C-M, R-P 6,770$
R1-50 % 4,820$
R-2, M-H 4,820$
"DO" (Southeast Urban Area) 2025 Surcharge Rates

ZONING TOTAL
OS -
R-2 13,200$
C-1 19,570$
R1-45 % 12,860$
R1-50 % 13,200$
"DN" (Copper River Ranch) 2025 Surcharge Rates

ZONING TOTAL
R1-40 % 12,460$
"BX" (RT Park) 2025 Surcharge Rates

ZONING TOTAL
C-P, C-M, R-P 18,100$
Exhibit No. 3

AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
87 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
board\reso\perm\2024-1047
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-1047

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE

FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

RESOLUTION AMENDING THE STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL

MASTER PLAN AND AMENDING THE SCHEDULE

OF DRAINAGE FEES, SURCHARGES AND COSTS ESTABLISHING SUCH

COSTS AND FEES FOR LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS
(2025-2026)

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors enacted Resolution No. 1412 on February 9, 1988, establishing a schedule of drainage system costs and fees pursuant to the adopted Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan, said schedule being an element of the drainage fee ordinances of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, Cities of Clovis and Fresno, and the County of Fresno, which ordinances are incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors enacted resolutions from time to time, amending said schedule, the last District-wide amendment being Resolution No. 20 23-1026 adopted on December 13, 2023; and
WHEREAS, an amended Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map, attached as Exhibit “A” hereto, specifying public facilities and improvements, existing and proposed, which are necessary to provide drainage service and flood control within the respective local drainage areas specified therein, has been presented to the Board of Directors; and
Attachment 4
88 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
board\reso\perm\2024-1047
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-1047

WHEREAS, the District’s Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan includes a study of the impacts of contemplated future development on the District's existing storm drainage services and facilities in the local drainage areas of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District listed in Exhibit “B” attached hereto, along with an analysis of new, improved or expanded public facilities and improvements required or appropriate to serve development in said local drainage areas; and

WHEREAS, as to each of said local drainage areas, said Map, said Plan and said study set forth the relationship between development and said services or facilities; the estimated cost thereof; and the schedule of per gross acre fees calculated to raise the sum of money necessary to pay the estimated total cost of local drainage facilities therein; and

WHEREAS, AB 602 - Section 66016.5(a)(5) of the California Government Code requirement to compute fees for residential housing by square footage of the building structure is inconsistent with the District’s method of calculating fees and does not affect the drainage fee rates as long as the necessary findings required by Section 66016.5(a)(5)(B) for using an alternative basis for calculating fees are made and adopted as follows: (1) the District’s method of computing drainage fees using percent imperviousness of a project is a more equitable method of computing drainage fees and calculating a fee based upon square footage does not capture impervious surfaces outside of the footprint of the structure; (2) the fees rates used are based on land use as determined by the Cities of Fresno and Clovis and the County of Fresno’s General Plan; and
89 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
board\reso\perm\2024-1047
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-1047

(3) District does not collect fees for smaller residential improvements under 1,000 square feet on developed or partially developed property, ‘tiny homes’ under 750 square feet, and development with additional improvements that are not equal or more than 25% of property developed prior to March 15, 1969; and
WHEREAS, said Map and said study were available at the District’s office for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing, and notice was given in compliance with the requirements therefor; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing was held pursuant to the public notice cited herein at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors finds as follows:

A. That the purpose of said fees is to finance facilities within the District required for the removal of surface and storm waters attributable to development; to obviate the menace to the public health, safety and welfare arising from inadequate provision for removal of surface and storm waters occurring as the result of development of property; to prevent deterioration of property values and impairment of conditions making for desirable residential, commercial or industrial development, as the case may be, which would result from the failure to construct planned local drainage facilities relative to develop ment of property; and to prevent deterioration of public streets and other public facilities which would result from failure to construct planned local drainage facilities concurrently with development.
90 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
board\reso\perm\2024-1047
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-1047

B. The fees adopted and collected pursuant to the drainage fee ordinances and this Resolution are to be used to finance only the public facilities shown on Exhibit “A”, within each of the respective local drainage areas identified in Exhibit “B” hereto.

C. After considering said Map and said study and the analysis prepared by the District; the respective General Plans and community and specific plans prepared by the Development Departments of said County and Cities; and the information and testimony received at this public hearing, the Board of Directors approves said Map and said study, and incorporates such herein. The Board further finds that all new development in the subject area will generate the need for storm drainage facilities therein, and generates an unmet need for storm drainage facilities and services in said area.

D. There is a need in local drainage areas for storm drainage facilities which have not been constructed or have been constructed; said facilities have been called for in, or are consistent with, the General Plans. Development will contribute its fair share toward the facility costs in those local drainage areas listed in Exhibit “B” through payment of the respective drainage fees set forth therein.

E. The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities and the impacts of the types of development as described in Exhibits “A” and “B” for which the corresponding fee set forth in Exhibit “B” is charged. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of said fee and development of the lands in the service area for which the fee is charged, as these reasonable

91 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
board\reso\perm\2024-1047
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-1047

relationships or nexuses are described in more detail in the study and Map referred to above.

F. The Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan Map attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and the storm drainage fee rate schedule set forth in Exhibit “B”, as adopted by Paragraphs 2 and 3 herein, revise the District’s Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan, to conform to its General Plan and comply with Se ction 66483 of the California Government Code.

G. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit “B” are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the fee schedule set forth therein is based on said estimates and is to generate fees from development which will not exceed the total of these costs.

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Board of Directors of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District that:

1. The above recitals are true and correct, and this Board so finds and determines.

2. This Resolution is exempt from further California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) assessment per the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)(D).

3. This Resolution is in compliance with California State Assembly Bill (AB) 602 – Section 66016.5(a)(5)(B) of the Government Code.

92 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
board\reso\perm\2024-1047
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-1047

4. The Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan is hereby amended to include that Storm Drain and Flood Control Master Plan Map attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and as supported by Exhibit “B”.

5. The schedule of drainage fees for those respective local drainage areas listed in Exhibit “B” hereto is hereby adopted as set forth in said Exhibit “B”. The District shall prepare a 202 5-2026 schedule of drainage fees for each of its local drainage areas, which shall include the amendments adopted herein. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66017, said schedule of drainage fees shall become effective no sooner than sixty (60) days from the date of adoption of this Resolution. In compliance with Calif ornia Government Code Section 66017, the District's 2025-2026 schedule of drainage fees shall be effective as of March 1, 2025, in accordance with the drainage fee ordinances. Fees shall be paid in accordance with the drainage fee ordinances and as specified in said 2025 -2026 drainage fee schedule.

6. The fee shall be used solely to pay: (a) costs related to the design, administration and construction of the described public storm water facilities; (b) for reimbursing the District for the development's fair share of those costs incurred by the District in the design and construction of the described public storm water facilities; or (c) to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities in each service area where those facilities were beyond that needed to mitigate the impacts of the ot her developers' project or projects and where reimbursement is provided for in the applicable Drainage Fee Ordinance.

93 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
board\reso\perm\2024-1047
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-1047

7. The District, pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance, shall analyze and review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements for which this fee is charged, the continued or expanded need therefor, and the reasonable relationship between such facility needs and the varying types of development. The General Manager-Secretary shall report the findings to the Board of Directors and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed.

8. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66022, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Resolution shall be brought within one hundred twenty (120) days of the adoption of this Resolution. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66022, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the fee increase shall commence within one hundred twenty (120) days of the effective date of the increase, which is identified in Paragraph No. 5 hereinabove.

Administrative appeal is a mandatory prerequisite to any such judicial action or proceeding.

Such appeal shall be made in writing to the Director of Development of Public Works of the political subdivision in which the property subjected hereto is located (i.e., the City of Fresno, the City of Clovis or the County of Fresno). Such appeal must be made within sixty (60) days after the effective date hereof. The Director shall set the matter for hearing, conduct the hearing and render a decision within forty (40) days after such appeal is filed.

94 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
board\reso\perm\2024-1047
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-1047

9. The Ordinances of the City of Fresno, City of Clovis, and the County of Fresno have an administrative mechanism whereby a property owner who seeks to develop property within the boundaries of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District can challenge the fees imposed thereunder only by first paying said fees under protest. Developers of property within the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District shall adhere to the applicable ordinance of the City of Fresno, City of Clovis or the County of Fresno under which it is required that drainage fees must be paid before development is allowed, and that such fee may be paid under protest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of December, 2024, by the following vote to wit:

AYES: Directors Fowler, Green, Auston, Busani, Mendes, and Allen Rojas NOES: None
ABSENT: Director Garcia
ABSTAIN: None
95 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Exhibit A
96 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
board\reso\perm\2024-
2025 Drainage Fee Schedule with Amendments (County Schedule) County S chedule includes both City of Fresno and Clov is Schedules Exhibit B
97 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
2025 DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE
Fresno County
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
Note: The information provided herein is in accordance with California Government Code Section 66016.5(a)(5)(B) and is subject to the findings adopted per Resolution No. 2024-1047. This disclaimer pertains specifically to the support expressed for the continuation of District Policies related to the calculation and imposition of residential development impact fees on a per-gross-acre basis. 1 of 142025 FMFCD3/2025 98
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.
2 of 14
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
Fresno County
99 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
R

BASIN
$1,430
$1,630
$2,050
$2,450
$2,870
$3,070
$3,220
$3,380
$3,380
$3,780
$4,600
$6,690
$7,170
$7,680
$3,037,290
PIPE
$1,840
$2,080
$2,770
$3,010
$3,260
$3,390
$3,500
$3,600
$3,600
$3,850
$4,110
$4,780
$5,050
$5,330
$2,830,980
TOTAL
$3,270
$3,710
$4,820
$5,460
$6,130
$6,460
$6,720
$6,980
$6,980
$7,630
$8,710
$11,470
$12,220
$13,010
$5,868,270
AB

BASIN
$1,210
$1,380
$1,730
$2,070
$2,420
$2,590
$2,720
$2,850
$2,850
$3,190
$3,880
$5,650
$6,050
$6,480
$2,077,520
PIPE
$1,000
$1,130
$1,500
$1,630
$1,770
$1,840
$1,900
$1,950
$1,950
$2,090
$2,230
$2,590
$2,740
$2,890
$1,420,070
TOTAL
$2,210
$2,510
$3,230
$3,700
$4,190
$4,430
$4,620
$4,800
$4,800
$5,280
$6,110
$8,240
$8,790
$9,370
$3,497,590
AC

BASIN
$640
$730
$920
$1,100
$1,280
$1,370
$1,440
$1,520
$1,520
$1,700
$2,060
$3,000
$3,210
$3,440
$1,095,117
PIPE
$890
$1,010
$1,340
$1,460
$1,580
$1,650
$1,700
$1,740
$1,740
$1,870
$1,990
$2,320
$2,450
$2,580
$1,164,819
TOTAL
$1,530
$1,740
$2,260
$2,560
$2,860
$3,020
$3,140
$3,260
$3,260
$3,570
$4,050
$5,320
$5,660
$6,020
$2,259,936
AD

BASIN
$1,740
$1,990
$2,490
$2,980
$3,490
$3,730
$3,920
$4,110
$4,110
$4,600
$5,590
$8,140
$8,710
$9,340
$1,418,670
PIPE
$480
$540
$720
$780
$840
$880
$910
$930
$930
$1,000
$1,060
$1,230
$1,310
$1,380
$330,500
TOTAL
$2,220
$2,530
$3,210
$3,760
$4,330
$4,610
$4,830
$5,040
$5,040
$5,600
$6,650
$9,370
$10,020
$10,720
$1,749,170
AE

BASIN
$2,420
$2,760
$3,460
$4,130
$4,840
$5,170
$5,440
$5,710
$5,710
$6,380
$7,760
$11,290
$12,090
$12,960
$3,424,140
PIPE
$660
$740
$980
$1,070
$1,160
$1,210
$1,250
$1,280
$1,280
$1,370
$1,460
$1,700
$1,800
$1,900
$745,210
TOTAL
$3,080
$3,500
$4,440
$5,200
$6,000
$6,380
$6,690
$6,990
$6,990
$7,750
$9,220
$12,990
$13,890
$14,860
$4,169,350
AF

BASIN
$1,120
$1,270
$1,600
$1,910
$2,240
$2,390
$2,510
$2,640
$2,640
$2,950
$3,590
$5,220
$5,590
$5,990
$1,879,470
PIPE
$500
$570
$750
$820
$890
$920
$950
$980
$980
$1,050
$1,120
$1,300
$1,380
$1,450
$508,340
TOTAL
$1,620
$1,840
$2,350
$2,730
$3,130
$3,310
$3,460
$3,620
$3,620
$4,000
$4,710
$6,520
$6,970
$7,440
$2,387,810
AG

BASIN
$520
$590
$740
$880
$1,030
$1,110
$1,160
$1,220
$1,220
$1,360
$1,660
$2,410
$2,580
$2,770
$1,431,120
PIPE
$1,710
$1,930
$2,570
$2,790
$3,030
$3,150
$3,250
$3,340
$3,340
$3,580
$3,820
$4,430
$4,690
$4,950
$2,888,080
TOTAL
$2,230
$2,520
$3,310
$3,670
$4,060
$4,260
$4,410
$4,560
$4,560
$4,940
$5,480
$6,840
$7,270
$7,720
$4,319,200
AH

BASIN
$1,900
$2,170
$2,720
$3,250
$3,800
$4,070
$4,280
$4,490
$4,490
$5,020
$6,100
$8,880
$9,500
$10,190
$6,018,440
PIPE
$2,570
$2,900
$3,850
$4,190
$4,550
$4,730
$4,880
$5,010
$5,010
$5,370
$5,730
$6,650
$7,040
$7,430
$4,681,450
TOTAL
$4,470
$5,070
$6,570
$7,440
$8,350
$8,800
$9,160
$9,500
$9,500
$10,390
$11,830
$15,530
$16,540
$17,620
$10,699,890
AI

BASIN
$1,820
$2,070
$2,600
$3,110
$3,630
$3,890
$4,090
$4,290
$4,290
$4,800
$5,830
$8,490
$9,090
$9,740
$2,994,260
PIPE
$4,090
$4,620
$6,130
$6,660
$7,230
$7,520
$7,760
$7,970
$7,970
$8,540
$9,110
$10,580
$11,190
$11,810
$4,415,880
TOTAL
$5,910
$6,690
$8,730
$9,770
$10,860
$11,410
$11,850
$12,260
$12,260
$13,340
$14,940
$19,070
$20,280
$21,550
$7,410,140
AJ

BASIN
$2,280
$2,600
$3,270
$3,910
$4,570
$4,890
$5,140
$5,390
$5,390
$6,030
$7,330
$10,660
$11,420
$12,240
$2,096,600
PIPE
$620
$700
$930
$1,010
$1,100
$1,140
$1,180
$1,210
$1,210
$1,300
$1,390
$1,610
$1,700
$1,800
$460,970
TOTAL
$2,900
$3,300
$4,200
$4,920
$5,670
$6,030
$6,320
$6,600
$6,600
$7,330
$8,720
$12,270
$13,120
$14,040
$2,557,570
AK

BASIN
$1,480
$1,690
$2,120
$2,530
$2,960
$3,170
$3,330
$3,490
$3,490
$3,910
$4,750
$6,910
$7,400
$7,940
$4,507,940
PIPE
$2,490
$2,810
$3,740
$4,060
$4,410
$4,580
$4,730
$4,860
$4,860
$5,210
$5,560
$6,450
$6,830
$7,200
$5,654,190
TOTAL
$3,970
$4,500
$5,860
$6,590
$7,370
$7,750
$8,060
$8,350
$8,350
$9,120
$10,310
$13,360
$14,230
$15,140
$10,162,130
AL

BASIN
$1,430
$1,640
$2,050
$2,450
$2,870
$3,070
$3,230
$3,390
$3,390
$3,790
$4,600
$6,700
$7,170
$7,690
$3,468,170
PIPE
$3,010
$3,400
$4,510
$4,900
$5,320
$5,530
$5,710
$5,860
$5,860
$6,280
$6,710
$7,790
$8,240
$8,690
$5,608,620
TOTAL
$4,440
$5,040
$6,560
$7,350
$8,190
$8,600
$8,940
$9,250
$9,250
$10,070
$11,310
$14,490
$15,410
$16,380
$9,076,790
AM

BASIN
$2,370
$2,370
$2,970
$3,550
$4,150
$4,450
$4,670
$4,900
$4,900
$5,480
$6,670
$9,700
$10,390
$11,130
$1,260,966
PIPE
$5,950
$5,950
$7,900
$8,590
$9,330
$9,700
$10,010
$10,280
$10,280
$11,010
$11,750
$13,650
$14,440
$15,230
$2,886,860
TOTAL
$8,320
$8,320
$10,870
$12,140
$13,480
$14,150
$14,680
$15,180
$15,180
$16,490
$18,420
$23,350
$24,830
$26,360
$4,147,826
3 of 14
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
Fresno County
100
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
AN

BASIN
$2,400
$2,730
$3,430
$4,100
$4,800
$5,130
$5,400
$5,660
$5,660
$6,330
$7,700
$11,200
$11,990
$12,860
$3,395,970
PIPE
$2,190
$2,470
$3,280
$3,560
$3,870
$4,020
$4,150
$4,260
$4,260
$4,570
$4,870
$5,660
$5,990
$6,320
$2,607,460
TOTAL
$4,590
$5,200
$6,710
$7,660
$8,670
$9,150
$9,550
$9,920
$9,920
$10,900
$12,570
$16,860
$17,980
$19,180
$6,003,430
AO

BASIN
$2,240
$2,560
$3,210
$3,840
$4,490
$4,800
$5,050
$5,300
$5,300
$5,920
$7,200
$10,480
$11,220
$12,030
$4,039,420
PIPE
$7,030
$7,940
$10,540
$11,460
$12,440
$12,930
$13,360
$13,710
$13,710
$14,690
$15,680
$18,210
$19,260
$20,310
$9,474,630
TOTAL
$9,270
$10,500
$13,750
$15,300
$16,930
$17,730
$18,410
$19,010
$19,010
$20,610
$22,880
$28,690
$30,480
$32,340
$13,514,050
AQ

BASIN
$2,300
$2,620
$3,290
$3,930
$4,600
$4,920
$5,170
$5,420
$5,420
$6,070
$7,380
$10,730
$11,490
$12,310
$4,453,130
PIPE
$6,480
$7,320
$9,720
$10,560
$11,470
$11,920
$12,310
$12,630
$12,630
$13,540
$14,440
$16,780
$17,750
$18,720
$8,740,280
TOTAL
$8,780
$9,940
$13,010
$14,490
$16,070
$16,840
$17,480
$18,050
$18,050
$19,610
$21,820
$27,510
$29,240
$31,030
$13,193,410
AR

BASIN
$2,590
$2,950
$3,700
$4,430
$5,180
$5,540
$5,830
$6,110
$6,110
$6,840
$8,310
$12,090
$12,950
$13,880
$5,324,900
PIPE
$8,640
$9,760
$12,960
$14,080
$15,290
$15,890
$16,410
$16,840
$16,840
$18,050
$19,260
$22,370
$23,660
$24,960
$10,991,830
TOTAL
$11,230
$12,710
$16,660
$18,510
$20,470
$21,430
$22,240
$22,950
$22,950
$24,890
$27,570
$34,460
$36,610
$38,840
$16,316,730
AS

BASIN
$1,980
$2,250
$2,830
$3,380
$3,950
$4,230
$4,450
$4,670
$4,670
$5,220
$6,350
$9,230
$9,890
$10,600
$6,258,030
PIPE
$7,080
$8,010
$10,630
$11,550
$12,540
$13,040
$13,460
$13,820
$13,820
$14,810
$15,800
$18,350
$19,410
$20,470
$15,784,750
TOTAL
$9,060
$10,260
$13,460
$14,930
$16,490
$17,270
$17,910
$18,490
$18,490
$20,030
$22,150
$27,580
$29,300
$31,070
$22,042,780
AU

BASIN
$5,290
$6,030
$7,560
$9,040
$10,570
$11,310
$11,900
$12,480
$12,480
$13,960
$16,970
$24,690
$26,440
$28,340
$4,593,870
PIPE
$6,280
$7,090
$9,420
$10,230
$11,110
$11,550
$11,930
$12,240
$12,240
$13,120
$14,000
$16,260
$17,200
$18,140
$4,454,790
TOTAL
$11,570
$13,120
$16,980
$19,270
$21,680
$22,860
$23,830
$24,720
$24,720
$27,080
$30,970
$40,950
$43,640
$46,480
$9,048,660
AV

BASIN
$2,020
$2,300
$2,890
$3,460
$4,040
$4,330
$4,550
$4,770
$4,770
$5,340
$6,490
$9,440
$10,110
$10,840
$6,833,560
PIPE
$10,140
$11,460
$15,210
$16,530
$17,950
$18,660
$19,260
$19,770
$19,770
$21,190
$22,610
$26,260
$27,780
$29,300
$19,408,650
TOTAL
$12,160
$13,760
$18,100
$19,990
$21,990
$22,990
$23,810
$24,540
$24,540
$26,530
$29,100
$35,700
$37,890
$40,140
$26,242,210
AW1

BASIN
$1,640
$1,870
$2,340
$2,800
$3,280
$3,510
$3,690
$3,870
$3,870
$4,330
$5,260
$7,660
$8,200
$8,790
$2,412,760
PIPE
$10,230
$11,560
$15,350
$16,680
$18,110
$18,830
$19,440
$19,950
$19,950
$21,390
$22,820
$26,500
$28,040
$29,570
$8,352,480
TOTAL
$11,870
$13,430
$17,690
$19,480
$21,390
$22,340
$23,130
$23,820
$23,820
$25,720
$28,080
$34,160
$36,240
$38,360
$10,765,240
AW2

BASIN
$1,230
$1,410
$1,760
$2,110
$2,470
$2,640
$2,780
$2,910
$2,910
$3,260
$3,960
$5,760
$6,170
$6,620
$1,917,400
PIPE
$1,000
$1,130
$1,490
$1,620
$1,760
$1,830
$1,890
$1,940
$1,940
$2,080
$2,220
$2,580
$2,730
$2,880
$858,100
TOTAL
$2,230
$2,540
$3,250
$3,730
$4,230
$4,470
$4,670
$4,850
$4,850
$5,340
$6,180
$8,340
$8,900
$9,500
$2,775,500
AX

BASIN
$1,290
$1,470
$1,850
$2,210
$2,590
$2,770
$2,910
$3,050
$3,050
$3,420
$4,150
$6,040
$6,470
$6,930
$2,047,230
PIPE
$2,220
$2,510
$3,330
$3,620
$3,930
$4,080
$4,220
$4,330
$4,330
$4,640
$4,950
$5,750
$6,080
$6,410
$1,947,650
TOTAL
$3,510
$3,980
$5,180
$5,830
$6,520
$6,850
$7,130
$7,380
$7,380
$8,060
$9,100
$11,790
$12,550
$13,340
$3,994,880
AY

BASIN
$2,330
$2,660
$3,330
$3,990
$4,660
$4,990
$5,240
$5,500
$5,500
$6,150
$7,480
$10,880
$11,650
$12,490
$4,248,570
PIPE
$4,320
$4,880
$6,470
$7,040
$7,640
$7,940
$8,200
$8,420
$8,420
$9,020
$9,630
$11,180
$11,830
$12,480
$4,364,380
TOTAL
$6,650
$7,540
$9,800
$11,030
$12,300
$12,930
$13,440
$13,920
$13,920
$15,170
$17,110
$22,060
$23,480
$24,970
$8,612,950
AZ

BASIN
$670
$760
$950
$1,140
$1,330
$1,430
$1,500
$1,570
$1,570
$1,760
$2,140
$3,110
$3,330
$3,570
$1,802,320
PIPE
$2,740
$3,100
$4,110
$4,470
$4,850
$5,040
$5,210
$5,340
$5,340
$5,730
$6,110
$7,100
$7,510
$7,920
$4,302,380
TOTAL
$3,410
$3,860
$5,060
$5,610
$6,180
$6,470
$6,710
$6,910
$6,910
$7,490
$8,250
$10,210
$10,840
$11,490
$6,104,700
BC

BASIN
$1,950
$2,230
$2,800
$3,340
$3,910
$4,180
$4,400
$4,610
$4,610
$5,160
$6,270
$9,130
$9,770
$10,480
$5,395,560
PIPE
$3,560
$4,030
$5,340
$5,810
$6,310
$6,560
$6,770
$6,950
$6,950
$7,450
$7,950
$9,230
$9,760
$10,300
$7,213,140
TOTAL
$5,510
$6,260
$8,140
$9,150
$10,220
$10,740
$11,170
$11,560
$11,560
$12,610
$14,220
$18,360
$19,530
$20,780
$12,608,700
4 of 14
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
Fresno County
101
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
BD

BASIN
$1,930
$2,200
$2,760
$3,300
$3,860
$4,130
$4,340
$4,550
$4,550
$5,100
$6,200
$9,010
$9,650
$10,340
$3,195,040
PIPE
$3,820
$4,320
$5,730
$6,230
$6,760
$7,030
$7,260
$7,450
$7,450
$7,990
$8,520
$9,900
$10,470
$11,050
$4,229,700
TOTAL
$5,750
$6,520
$8,490
$9,530
$10,620
$11,160
$11,600
$12,000
$12,000
$13,090
$14,720
$18,910
$20,120
$21,390
$7,424,740
BE

BASIN
$1,820
$2,080
$2,610
$3,120
$3,650
$3,900
$4,100
$4,300
$4,300
$4,810
$5,850
$8,510
$9,110
$9,770
$1,749,940
PIPE
$2,660
$3,010
$4,000
$4,340
$4,720
$4,900
$5,060
$5,200
$5,200
$5,570
$5,940
$6,900
$7,300
$7,700
$2,147,830
TOTAL
$4,480
$5,090
$6,610
$7,460
$8,370
$8,800
$9,160
$9,500
$9,500
$10,380
$11,790
$15,410
$16,410
$17,470
$3,897,770
BF

BASIN
$2,510
$2,860
$3,580
$4,290
$5,010
$5,360
$5,640
$5,920
$5,920
$6,620
$8,050
$11,710
$12,530
$13,440
$2,187,610
PIPE
$1,610
$1,820
$2,410
$2,620
$2,840
$2,960
$3,050
$3,130
$3,130
$3,360
$3,580
$4,160
$4,400
$4,640
$1,135,210
TOTAL
$4,120
$4,680
$5,990
$6,910
$7,850
$8,320
$8,690
$9,050
$9,050
$9,980
$11,630
$15,870
$16,930
$18,080
$3,322,820
BG

BASIN
$2,090
$2,380
$2,990
$3,570
$4,170
$4,470
$4,700
$4,930
$4,930
$5,510
$6,700
$9,750
$10,440
$11,190
$4,867,460
PIPE
$4,470
$5,050
$6,710
$7,290
$7,920
$8,230
$8,500
$8,720
$8,720
$9,350
$9,970
$11,580
$12,250
$12,920
$6,974,230
TOTAL
$6,560
$7,430
$9,700
$10,860
$12,090
$12,700
$13,200
$13,650
$13,650
$14,860
$16,670
$21,330
$22,690
$24,110
$11,841,690
BH

BASIN
$1,150
$1,310
$1,640
$1,960
$2,290
$2,450
$2,580
$2,710
$2,710
$3,030
$3,680
$5,350
$5,730
$6,150
$2,287,720
PIPE
$5,280
$5,970
$7,920
$8,610
$9,350
$9,720
$10,040
$10,300
$10,300
$11,040
$11,780
$13,680
$14,470
$15,270
$9,276,640
TOTAL
$6,430
$7,280
$9,560
$10,570
$11,640
$12,170
$12,620
$13,010
$13,010
$14,070
$15,460
$19,030
$20,200
$21,420
$11,564,360
BJ

BASIN
$1,270
$1,450
$1,810
$2,170
$2,540
$2,720
$2,860
$3,000
$3,000
$3,350
$4,070
$5,930
$6,350
$6,800
$1,578,630
PIPE
$4,390
$4,960
$6,590
$7,160
$7,770
$8,080
$8,340
$8,560
$8,560
$9,180
$9,790
$11,370
$12,030
$12,690
$3,021,160
TOTAL
$5,660
$6,410
$8,400
$9,330
$10,310
$10,800
$11,200
$11,560
$11,560
$12,530
$13,860
$17,300
$18,380
$19,490
$4,599,790
BK

BASIN
$2,560
$2,920
$3,670
$4,390
$5,130
$5,490
$5,770
$6,050
$6,050
$6,770
$8,230
$11,980
$12,820
$13,750
$2,601,430
PIPE
$3,190
$3,600
$4,780
$5,190
$5,640
$5,860
$6,050
$6,210
$6,210
$6,660
$7,100
$8,250
$8,730
$9,210
$2,059,360
TOTAL
$5,750
$6,520
$8,450
$9,580
$10,770
$11,350
$11,820
$12,260
$12,260
$13,430
$15,330
$20,230
$21,550
$22,960
$4,660,790
BL

BASIN
$1,800
$2,060
$2,580
$3,080
$3,610
$3,860
$4,060
$4,260
$4,260
$4,760
$5,790
$8,420
$9,020
$9,670
$5,290,310
PIPE
$6,670
$7,540
$10,000
$10,870
$11,810
$12,270
$12,670
$13,010
$13,010
$13,940
$14,870
$17,270
$18,270
$19,280
$12,278,990
TOTAL
$8,470
$9,600
$12,580
$13,950
$15,420
$16,130
$16,730
$17,270
$17,270
$18,700
$20,660
$25,690
$27,290
$28,950
$17,569,300
BM

BASIN
$1,120
$1,280
$1,600
$1,910
$2,240
$2,400
$2,520
$2,640
$2,640
$2,960
$3,590
$5,230
$5,600
$6,000
$4,581,960
PIPE
$4,380
$4,950
$6,580
$7,150
$7,760
$8,070
$8,330
$8,550
$8,550
$9,160
$9,780
$11,350
$12,010
$12,670
$13,241,540
TOTAL
$5,500
$6,230
$8,180
$9,060
$10,000
$10,470
$10,850
$11,190
$11,190
$12,120
$13,370
$16,580
$17,610
$18,670
$17,823,500
BO

BASIN
$1,620
$1,840
$2,310
$2,770
$3,230
$3,460
$3,640
$3,820
$3,820
$4,270
$5,190
$7,550
$8,090
$8,670
$1,849,550
PIPE
$1,970
$2,230
$2,960
$3,220
$3,500
$3,630
$3,750
$3,850
$3,850
$4,130
$4,400
$5,110
$5,410
$5,710
$1,721,030
TOTAL
$3,590
$4,070
$5,270
$5,990
$6,730
$7,090
$7,390
$7,670
$7,670
$8,400
$9,590
$12,660
$13,500
$14,380
$3,570,580
BP

BASIN
$4,330
$4,940
$6,200
$7,410
$8,670
$9,270
$9,750
$10,220
$10,220
$11,440
$13,910
$20,230
$21,660
$23,220
$2,862,830
PIPE
$6,080
$6,880
$9,130
$9,920
$10,770
$11,190
$11,560
$11,860
$11,860
$12,720
$13,570
$15,760
$16,670
$17,580
$2,229,620
TOTAL
$10,410
$11,820
$15,330
$17,330
$19,440
$20,460
$21,310
$22,080
$22,080
$24,160
$27,480
$35,990
$38,330
$40,800
$5,092,450
BQ

BASIN
$1,800
$2,050
$2,580
$3,080
$3,600
$3,850
$4,050
$4,250
$4,250
$4,760
$5,780
$8,410
$9,010
$9,660
$3,292,780
PIPE
$4,280
$4,840
$6,430
$6,980
$7,580
$7,880
$8,140
$8,350
$8,350
$8,950
$9,550
$11,100
$11,740
$12,380
$5,012,050
TOTAL
$6,080
$6,890
$9,010
$10,060
$11,180
$11,730
$12,190
$12,600
$12,600
$13,710
$15,330
$19,510
$20,750
$22,040
$8,304,830
BR

BASIN
$2,920
$3,330
$4,180
$5,000
$5,850
$6,260
$6,580
$6,900
$6,900
$7,720
$9,390
$13,660
$14,620
$15,680
$3,729,320
PIPE
$5,590
$6,320
$8,390
$9,110
$9,900
$10,290
$10,620
$10,900
$10,900
$11,690
$12,470
$14,480
$15,320
$16,160
$3,953,910
TOTAL
$8,510
$9,650
$12,570
$14,110
$15,750
$16,550
$17,200
$17,800
$17,800
$19,410
$21,860
$28,140
$29,940
$31,840
$7,683,230
5 of 14
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
Fresno County
102
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
BS

BASIN
$2,130
$2,430
$3,040
$3,640
$4,260
$4,560
$4,790
$5,020
$5,020
$5,620
$6,830
$9,940
$10,650
$11,410
$6,234,910
PIPE
$5,590
$6,320
$8,390
$9,110
$9,900
$10,290
$10,620
$10,900
$10,900
$11,680
$12,470
$14,480
$15,320
$16,160
$12,592,560
TOTAL
$7,720
$8,750
$11,430
$12,750
$14,160
$14,850
$15,410
$15,920
$15,920
$17,300
$19,300
$24,420
$25,970
$27,570
$18,827,470
BT

BASIN
$2,520
$2,880
$3,610
$4,310
$5,050
$5,400
$5,680
$5,950
$5,950
$6,660
$8,100
$11,780
$12,620
$13,520
$5,241,440
PIPE
$5,640
$6,370
$8,450
$9,190
$9,980
$10,370
$10,710
$10,990
$10,990
$11,780
$12,570
$14,600
$15,440
$16,290
$10,332,910
TOTAL
$8,160
$9,250
$12,060
$13,500
$15,030
$15,770
$16,390
$16,940
$16,940
$18,440
$20,670
$26,380
$28,060
$29,810
$15,574,350
BU

BASIN
$670
$760
$960
$1,150
$1,340
$1,440
$1,510
$1,580
$1,580
$1,770
$2,150
$3,130
$3,350
$3,600
$3,014,950
PIPE
$2,490
$2,810
$3,730
$4,060
$4,400
$4,580
$4,730
$4,850
$4,850
$5,200
$5,550
$6,440
$6,820
$7,190
$6,553,900
TOTAL
$3,160
$3,570
$4,690
$5,210
$5,740
$6,020
$6,240
$6,430
$6,430
$6,970
$7,700
$9,570
$10,170
$10,790
$9,568,850
BV

BASIN
$1,210
$1,380
$1,740
$2,080
$2,430
$2,600
$2,730
$2,860
$2,860
$3,200
$3,900
$5,670
$6,070
$6,500
$1,746,410
PIPE
$2,290
$2,590
$3,430
$3,730
$4,050
$4,210
$4,350
$4,460
$4,460
$4,780
$5,100
$5,930
$6,270
$6,620
$2,704,750
TOTAL
$3,500
$3,970
$5,170
$5,810
$6,480
$6,810
$7,080
$7,320
$7,320
$7,980
$9,000
$11,600
$12,340
$13,120
$4,451,160
BW

BASIN
$970
$1,110
$1,390
$1,660
$1,940
$2,080
$2,190
$2,300
$2,300
$2,570
$3,120
$4,540
$4,860
$5,210
$1,211,930
PIPE
$1,090
$1,240
$1,640
$1,780
$1,940
$2,010
$2,080
$2,130
$2,130
$2,290
$2,440
$2,830
$3,000
$3,160
$1,082,900
TOTAL
$2,060
$2,350
$3,030
$3,440
$3,880
$4,090
$4,270
$4,430
$4,430
$4,860
$5,560
$7,370
$7,860
$8,370
$2,294,830
BX

BASIN
$1,640
$1,870
$2,340
$2,800
$3,280
$3,500
$3,680
$3,860
$3,860
$4,320
$5,260
$7,650
$8,190
$8,780
$6,651,750
PIPE
$3,210
$3,630
$4,810
$5,230
$5,680
$5,900
$6,100
$6,260
$6,260
$6,710
$7,160
$8,310
$8,790
$9,270
$10,655,080
TOTAL
$4,850
$5,500
$7,150
$8,030
$8,960
$9,400
$9,780
$10,120
$10,120
$11,030
$12,420
$15,960
$16,980
$18,050
$17,306,830
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n No. 2017-864 A
mended 2018-908,
2020-958, 2021-
979, 2022-1009.

BY1

BASIN
$1,700
$1,940
$2,430
$2,910
$3,400
$3,640
$3,830
$4,010
$4,010
$4,490
$5,460
$7,940
$8,500
$9,110
$4,679,230
PIPE
$1,180
$1,340
$1,780
$1,930
$2,100
$2,180
$2,250
$2,310
$2,310
$2,470
$2,640
$3,070
$3,240
$3,420
$3,205,710
TOTAL
$2,880
$3,280
$4,210
$4,840
$5,500
$5,820
$6,080
$6,320
$6,320
$6,960
$8,100
$11,010
$11,740
$12,530
$7,884,940
BY2

BASIN
$1,940
$2,220
$2,780
$3,330
$3,890
$4,160
$4,380
$4,590
$4,590
$5,130
$6,240
$9,080
$9,720
$10,420
$4,600,910
PIPE
$9,230
$10,430
$13,850
$15,040
$16,340
$16,980
$17,540
$18,000
$18,000
$19,290
$20,580
$23,910
$25,290
$26,670
$18,256,030
TOTAL
$11,170
$12,650
$16,630
$18,370
$20,230
$21,140
$21,920
$22,590
$22,590
$24,420
$26,820
$32,990
$35,010
$37,090
$22,856,940
BZ

BASIN
$3,040
$3,470
$4,350
$5,200
$6,090
$6,510
$6,850
$7,180
$7,180
$8,030
$9,770
$14,210
$15,210
$16,310
$3,865,120
PIPE
$2,140
$2,410
$3,200
$3,480
$3,780
$3,930
$4,060
$4,160
$4,160
$4,460
$4,760
$5,530
$5,850
$6,170
$2,304,640
TOTAL
$5,180
$5,880
$7,550
$8,680
$9,870
$10,440
$10,910
$11,340
$11,340
$12,490
$14,530
$19,740
$21,060
$22,480
$6,169,760
CD

BASIN
$3,680
$4,190
$5,260
$6,290
$7,360
$7,870
$8,280
$8,680
$8,680
$9,710
$11,810
$17,180
$18,400
$19,720
$5,587,300
PIPE
$5,870
$6,640
$8,810
$9,570
$10,400
$10,810
$11,160
$11,450
$11,450
$12,270
$13,100
$15,210
$16,090
$16,970
$7,024,710
TOTAL
$9,550
$10,830
$14,070
$15,860
$17,760
$18,680
$19,440
$20,130
$20,130
$21,980
$24,910
$32,390
$34,490
$36,690
$12,612,010
CE

BASIN
$1,340
$1,520
$1,910
$2,280
$2,670
$2,860
$3,010
$3,150
$3,150
$3,530
$4,290
$6,240
$6,680
$7,160
$3,951,400
PIPE
$9,220
$10,420
$13,830
$15,030
$16,320
$16,970
$17,520
$17,980
$17,980
$19,280
$20,570
$23,890
$25,270
$26,650
$15,127,760
TOTAL
$10,560
$11,940
$15,740
$17,310
$18,990
$19,830
$20,530
$21,130
$21,130
$22,810
$24,860
$30,130
$31,950
$33,810
$19,079,160
CF

BASIN
$1,210
$1,370
$1,720
$2,060
$2,410
$2,580
$2,710
$2,840
$2,840
$3,180
$3,870
$5,630
$6,030
$6,460
$3,712,570
PIPE
$7,540
$8,520
$11,310
$12,290
$13,340
$13,870
$14,320
$14,700
$14,700
$15,760
$16,810
$19,530
$20,660
$21,790
$12,878,790
TOTAL
$8,750
$9,890
$13,030
$14,350
$15,750
$16,450
$17,030
$17,540
$17,540
$18,940
$20,680
$25,160
$26,690
$28,250
$16,591,360
CG

BASIN
$3,910
$4,460
$5,590
$6,680
$7,820
$8,360
$8,790
$9,220
$9,220
$10,320
$12,550
$18,250
$19,540
$20,950
$7,342,520
PIPE
$7,770
$8,780
$11,660
$12,670
$13,760
$14,300
$14,770
$15,160
$15,160
$16,250
$17,340
$20,130
$21,300
$22,470
$12,221,050
TOTAL
$11,680
$13,240
$17,250
$19,350
$21,580
$22,660
$23,560
$24,380
$24,380
$26,570
$29,890
$38,380
$40,840
$43,420
$19,563,570
6 of 14
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
Fresno County
103
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
CH

BASIN
$2,590
$2,960
$3,710
$4,440
$5,190
$5,550
$5,840
$6,120
$6,120
$6,850
$8,330
$12,120
$12,970
$13,910
$5,031,090
PIPE
$9,580
$10,820
$14,370
$15,610
$16,950
$17,630
$18,200
$18,680
$18,680
$20,020
$21,360
$24,810
$26,250
$27,680
$15,609,210
TOTAL
$12,170
$13,780
$18,080
$20,050
$22,140
$23,180
$24,040
$24,800
$24,800
$26,870
$29,690
$36,930
$39,220
$41,590
$20,640,300
CI

BASIN
$2,520
$2,870
$3,600
$4,310
$5,040
$5,390
$5,670
$5,940
$5,940
$6,650
$8,080
$11,760
$12,590
$13,500
$2,464,990
PIPE
$3,880
$4,390
$5,820
$6,330
$6,870
$7,140
$7,380
$7,570
$7,570
$8,110
$8,660
$10,060
$10,640
$11,220
$3,172,550
TOTAL
$6,400
$7,260
$9,420
$10,640
$11,910
$12,530
$13,050
$13,510
$13,510
$14,760
$16,740
$21,820
$23,230
$24,720
$5,637,540
CJ

BASIN
$3,400
$3,880
$4,860
$5,820
$6,800
$7,280
$7,650
$8,030
$8,030
$8,980
$10,920
$15,880
$17,000
$18,230
$6,476,990
PIPE
$7,860
$8,880
$11,790
$12,810
$13,910
$14,460
$14,930
$15,330
$15,330
$16,430
$17,530
$20,360
$21,540
$22,720
$12,700,370
TOTAL
$11,260
$12,760
$16,650
$18,630
$20,710
$21,740
$22,580
$23,360
$23,360
$25,410
$28,450
$36,240
$38,540
$40,950
$19,177,360
CK

BASIN
$2,810
$3,200
$4,010
$4,800
$5,610
$6,000
$6,310
$6,620
$6,620
$7,410
$9,010
$13,100
$14,030
$15,040
$4,377,110
PIPE
$7,250
$8,200
$10,880
$11,820
$12,840
$13,350
$13,780
$14,140
$14,140
$15,160
$16,170
$18,790
$19,870
$20,960
$9,566,040
TOTAL
$10,060
$11,400
$14,890
$16,620
$18,450
$19,350
$20,090
$20,760
$20,760
$22,570
$25,180
$31,890
$33,900
$36,000
$13,943,150
CL

BASIN
$880
$1,010
$1,260
$1,510
$1,770
$1,890
$1,990
$2,090
$2,090
$2,330
$2,840
$4,130
$4,420
$4,740
$2,320,120
PIPE
$1,190
$1,350
$1,790
$1,940
$2,110
$2,200
$2,270
$2,330
$2,330
$2,490
$2,660
$3,090
$3,270
$3,450
$2,269,940
TOTAL
$2,070
$2,360
$3,050
$3,450
$3,880
$4,090
$4,260
$4,420
$4,420
$4,820
$5,500
$7,220
$7,690
$8,190
$4,590,060
CM

BASIN
$440
$500
$630
$750
$880
$940
$990
$1,040
$1,040
$1,160
$1,410
$2,050
$2,200
$2,360
$1,152,080
PIPE
$750
$840
$1,120
$1,210
$1,320
$1,370
$1,420
$1,450
$1,450
$1,560
$1,660
$1,930
$2,040
$2,150
$1,277,680
TOTAL
$1,190
$1,340
$1,750
$1,960
$2,200
$2,310
$2,410
$2,490
$2,490
$2,720
$3,070
$3,980
$4,240
$4,510
$2,429,760
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n No.1228.

CN

BASIN
$210
$240
$300
$360
$420
$450
$470
$490
$490
$550
$670
$980
$1,050
$1,120
$691,340
PIPE
$900
$1,020
$1,360
$1,470
$1,600
$1,660
$1,720
$1,760
$1,760
$1,890
$2,010
$2,340
$2,480
$2,610
$1,860,470
TOTAL
$1,110
$1,260
$1,660
$1,830
$2,020
$2,110
$2,190
$2,250
$2,250
$2,440
$2,680
$3,320
$3,530
$3,730
$2,551,810
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n Nos. 1159, 134
2, 1414, & 1422.

CO1

BASIN
$880
$1,000
$1,250
$1,500
$1,760
$1,880
$1,970
$2,070
$2,070
$2,320
$2,820
$4,100
$4,390
$4,700
$868,070
PIPE
$1,580
$1,780
$2,360
$2,570
$2,790
$2,900
$3,000
$3,070
$3,070
$3,290
$3,520
$4,080
$4,320
$4,560
$1,226,900
TOTAL
$2,460
$2,780
$3,610
$4,070
$4,550
$4,780
$4,970
$5,140
$5,140
$5,610
$6,340
$8,180
$8,710
$9,260
$2,094,970
CP

BASIN
$4,860
$5,540
$6,950
$8,310
$9,720
$10,400
$10,940
$11,470
$11,470
$12,830
$15,610
$22,700
$24,310
$26,060
$3,773,610
PIPE
$9,040
$10,220
$13,560
$14,740
$16,000
$16,640
$17,180
$17,630
$17,630
$18,900
$20,160
$23,420
$24,770
$26,130
$5,576,710
TOTAL
$13,900
$15,760
$20,510
$23,050
$25,720
$27,040
$28,120
$29,100
$29,100
$31,730
$35,770
$46,120
$49,080
$52,190
$9,350,320
CQ

BASIN
$3,680
$4,200
$5,270
$6,300
$7,360
$7,880
$8,280
$8,690
$8,690
$9,720
$11,820
$17,200
$18,410
$19,740
$3,911,440
PIPE
$6,260
$7,070
$9,390
$10,200
$11,080
$11,520
$11,890
$12,210
$12,210
$13,080
$13,960
$16,210
$17,150
$18,090
$4,987,060
TOTAL
$9,940
$11,270
$14,660
$16,500
$18,440
$19,400
$20,170
$20,900
$20,900
$22,800
$25,780
$33,410
$35,560
$37,830
$8,898,500
CS

BASIN
$860
$990
$1,240
$1,480
$1,730
$1,850
$1,940
$2,040
$2,040
$2,280
$2,770
$4,040
$4,320
$4,630
$3,395,860
PIPE
$6,210
$7,010
$9,310
$10,120
$10,990
$11,420
$11,790
$12,100
$12,100
$12,970
$13,840
$16,080
$17,010
$17,940
$13,525,780
TOTAL
$7,070
$8,000
$10,550
$11,600
$12,720
$13,270
$13,730
$14,140
$14,140
$15,250
$16,610
$20,120
$21,330
$22,570
$16,921,640
CU

BASIN
$2,200
$2,500
$3,140
$3,760
$4,390
$4,700
$4,940
$5,180
$5,180
$5,800
$7,050
$10,260
$10,980
$11,770
$3,246,070
PIPE
$5,460
$6,170
$8,190
$8,900
$9,660
$10,040
$10,370
$10,640
$10,640
$11,410
$12,170
$14,130
$14,950
$15,770
$4,472,950
TOTAL
$7,660
$8,670
$11,330
$12,660
$14,050
$14,740
$15,310
$15,820
$15,820
$17,210
$19,220
$24,390
$25,930
$27,540
$7,719,020
CV

BASIN
$1,740
$1,990
$2,490
$2,980
$3,490
$3,730
$3,920
$4,110
$4,110
$4,600
$5,600
$8,140
$8,720
$9,350
$2,697,320
PIPE
$1,500
$1,690
$2,250
$2,440
$2,650
$2,760
$2,850
$2,920
$2,920
$3,130
$3,340
$3,880
$4,110
$4,330
$1,285,500
TOTAL
$3,240
$3,680
$4,740
$5,420
$6,140
$6,490
$6,770
$7,030
$7,030
$7,730
$8,940
$12,020
$12,830
$13,680
$3,982,820
7 of 14
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
Fresno County
104
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
CW

BASIN
$800
$910
$1,150
$1,370
$1,600
$1,710
$1,800
$1,890
$1,890
$2,110
$2,570
$3,740
$4,000
$4,290
$1,980,650
PIPE
$600
$680
$900
$970
$1,060
$1,100
$1,140
$1,170
$1,170
$1,250
$1,330
$1,550
$1,640
$1,730
$1,009,200
TOTAL
$1,400
$1,590
$2,050
$2,340
$2,660
$2,810
$2,940
$3,060
$3,060
$3,360
$3,900
$5,290
$5,640
$6,020
$2,989,850
CX

BASIN
$850
$970
$1,210
$1,450
$1,700
$1,820
$1,910
$2,000
$2,000
$2,240
$2,730
$3,970
$4,250
$4,550
$1,543,230
PIPE
$1,160
$1,310
$1,740
$1,890
$2,050
$2,130
$2,200
$2,260
$2,260
$2,420
$2,590
$3,000
$3,180
$3,350
$1,701,690
TOTAL
$2,010
$2,280
$2,950
$3,340
$3,750
$3,950
$4,110
$4,260
$4,260
$4,660
$5,320
$6,970
$7,430
$7,900
$3,244,920
CY

BASIN
$900
$1,020
$1,280
$1,530
$1,790
$1,920
$2,020
$2,110
$2,110
$2,360
$2,880
$4,180
$4,480
$4,800
$1,389,390
PIPE
$990
$1,120
$1,490
$1,620
$1,760
$1,830
$1,890
$1,940
$1,940
$2,080
$2,220
$2,580
$2,730
$2,870
$1,210,890
TOTAL
$1,890
$2,140
$2,770
$3,150
$3,550
$3,750
$3,910
$4,050
$4,050
$4,440
$5,100
$6,760
$7,210
$7,670
$2,600,280
CZ

BASIN
$560
$640
$800
$960
$1,120
$1,200
$1,260
$1,320
$1,320
$1,480
$1,790
$2,610
$2,790
$3,000
$1,551,490
PIPE
$1,250
$1,420
$1,880
$2,040
$2,220
$2,310
$2,380
$2,450
$2,450
$2,620
$2,800
$3,250
$3,440
$3,620
$2,788,260
TOTAL
$1,810
$2,060
$2,680
$3,000
$3,340
$3,510
$3,640
$3,770
$3,770
$4,100
$4,590
$5,860
$6,230
$6,620
$4,339,750
DE

BASIN
$1,760
$2,010
$2,520
$3,010
$3,520
$3,770
$3,960
$4,150
$4,150
$4,650
$5,650
$8,220
$8,800
$9,430
$3,454,940
PIPE
$2,100
$2,370
$3,150
$3,420
$3,720
$3,870
$3,990
$4,100
$4,100
$4,390
$4,690
$5,440
$5,760
$6,070
$3,294,770
TOTAL
$3,860
$4,380
$5,670
$6,430
$7,240
$7,640
$7,950
$8,250
$8,250
$9,040
$10,340
$13,660
$14,560
$15,500
$6,749,710
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n No. 2006-486.

DF

BASIN
$570
$650
$820
$970
$1,140
$1,220
$1,280
$1,350
$1,350
$1,510
$1,830
$2,660
$2,850
$3,060
$165,172
PIPE
$1,070
$1,210
$1,610
$1,750
$1,900
$1,970
$2,040
$2,090
$2,090
$2,240
$2,390
$2,780
$2,940
$3,100
$283,883
TOTAL
$1,640
$1,860
$2,430
$2,720
$3,040
$3,190
$3,320
$3,440
$3,440
$3,750
$4,220
$5,440
$5,790
$6,160
$449,055
DG

BASIN
$720
$830
$1,040
$1,240
$1,450
$1,550
$1,630
$1,710
$1,710
$1,910
$2,320
$3,380
$3,620
$3,880
$447,419
PIPE
$1,260
$1,430
$1,900
$2,060
$2,240
$2,320
$2,400
$2,460
$2,460
$2,640
$2,820
$3,270
$3,460
$3,650
$720,114
TOTAL
$1,980
$2,260
$2,940
$3,300
$3,690
$3,870
$4,030
$4,170
$4,170
$4,550
$5,140
$6,650
$7,080
$7,530
$1,167,533
DH

BASIN
$860
$980
$1,230
$1,470
$1,720
$1,840
$1,930
$2,030
$2,030
$2,270
$2,760
$4,010
$4,290
$4,600
$1,590,510
PIPE
$960
$1,080
$1,440
$1,560
$1,690
$1,760
$1,820
$1,870
$1,870
$2,000
$2,130
$2,480
$2,620
$2,770
$1,109,580
TOTAL
$1,820
$2,060
$2,670
$3,030
$3,410
$3,600
$3,750
$3,900
$3,900
$4,270
$4,890
$6,490
$6,910
$7,370
$2,700,090
DI

BASIN
$460
$520
$650
$780
$920
$980
$1,030
$1,080
$1,080
$1,210
$1,470
$2,140
$2,290
$2,450
$219,705
PIPE
$750
$850
$1,120
$1,220
$1,330
$1,380
$1,420
$1,460
$1,460
$1,570
$1,670
$1,940
$2,050
$2,170
$326,191
TOTAL
$1,210
$1,370
$1,770
$2,000
$2,250
$2,360
$2,450
$2,540
$2,540
$2,780
$3,140
$4,080
$4,340
$4,620
$545,896
DK

BASIN
$210
$230
$290
$350
$410
$440
$460
$490
$490
$540
$660
$960
$1,030
$1,100
$955,890
PIPE
$2,060
$2,330
$3,090
$3,360
$3,650
$3,790
$3,920
$4,020
$4,020
$4,310
$4,600
$5,340
$5,650
$5,960
$8,020,220
TOTAL
$2,270
$2,560
$3,380
$3,710
$4,060
$4,230
$4,380
$4,510
$4,510
$4,850
$5,260
$6,300
$6,680
$7,060
$8,976,110
DL

BASIN
$3,340
$3,810
$4,780
$5,710
$6,680
$7,150
$7,510
$7,880
$7,880
$8,820
$10,720
$15,600
$16,700
$17,900
$3,888,100
PIPE
$6,210
$7,020
$9,320
$10,120
$10,990
$11,430
$11,800
$12,110
$12,110
$12,980
$13,850
$16,090
$17,020
$17,950
$5,079,920
TOTAL
$9,550
$10,830
$14,100
$15,830
$17,670
$18,580
$19,310
$19,990
$19,990
$21,800
$24,570
$31,690
$33,720
$35,850
$8,968,020
DM

BASIN
$2,400
$2,740
$3,430
$4,110
$4,800
$5,140
$5,400
$5,670
$5,670
$6,340
$7,710
$11,210
$12,010
$12,870
$5,877,980
PIPE
$8,680
$9,800
$13,010
$14,140
$15,360
$15,960
$16,480
$16,920
$16,920
$18,130
$19,350
$22,470
$23,770
$25,070
$17,511,310
TOTAL
$11,080
$12,540
$16,440
$18,250
$20,160
$21,100
$21,880
$22,590
$22,590
$24,470
$27,060
$33,680
$35,780
$37,940
$23,389,290
DN

BASIN
$3,640
$4,150
$5,200
$6,220
$7,280
$7,790
$8,190
$8,590
$8,590
$9,610
$11,680
$16,990
$18,200
$19,510
$7,962,130
PIPE
$4,390
$4,970
$6,590
$7,160
$7,780
$8,090
$8,350
$8,570
$8,570
$9,180
$9,800
$11,380
$12,040
$12,700
$8,173,880
TOTAL
$8,030
$9,120
$11,790
$13,380
$15,060
$15,880
$16,540
$17,160
$17,160
$18,790
$21,480
$28,370
$30,240
$32,210
$16,136,010
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n No. 2016-840 A
mended 2017-000,
2017-884, 2018
-908, 2019-936,
2020-958, 2021-9
79, 2022-1009.
8 of 14
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
Fresno County
105
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
DO

BASIN
$2,110
$2,410
$3,020
$3,610
$4,220
$4,520
$4,750
$4,980
$4,980
$5,570
$6,770
$9,850
$10,550
$11,310
$6,474,660
PIPE
$3,050
$3,450
$4,580
$4,980
$5,410
$5,620
$5,800
$5,960
$5,960
$6,380
$6,810
$7,910
$8,370
$8,830
$7,251,850
TOTAL
$5,160
$5,860
$7,600
$8,590
$9,630
$10,140
$10,550
$10,940
$10,940
$11,950
$13,580
$17,760
$18,920
$20,140
$13,726,510
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n No. 2007-522 A
mended 2014-806,
2018-887, 2018-
908 and Board Re
solution No. 202
0-959 Amended 20
21-979 , 2022-10

09. DP

BASIN
$2,150
$2,450
$3,080
$3,680
$4,300
$4,600
$4,840
$5,080
$5,080
$5,680
$6,900
$10,040
$10,750
$11,530
$8,091,790
PIPE
$6,630
$7,490
$9,940
$10,800
$11,730
$12,200
$12,590
$12,930
$12,930
$13,850
$14,780
$17,170
$18,160
$19,160
$18,509,360
TOTAL
$8,780
$9,940
$13,020
$14,480
$16,030
$16,800
$17,430
$18,010
$18,010
$19,530
$21,680
$27,210
$28,910
$30,690
$26,601,150
DQ

BASIN
$7,350
$8,380
$10,510
$12,570
$14,700
$15,730
$16,530
$17,340
$17,340
$19,400
$23,590
$34,320
$36,740
$39,390
$6,040,260
PIPE
$6,790
$7,670
$10,190
$11,070
$12,020
$12,500
$12,900
$13,240
$13,240
$14,190
$15,150
$17,590
$18,610
$19,630
$4,805,190
TOTAL
$14,140
$16,050
$20,700
$23,640
$26,720
$28,230
$29,430
$30,580
$30,580
$33,590
$38,740
$51,910
$55,350
$59,020
$10,845,450
DS

BASIN
$3,310
$3,770
$4,730
$5,660
$6,620
$7,080
$7,440
$7,810
$7,810
$8,730
$10,620
$15,450
$16,540
$17,730
$14,649,250
PIPE
$8,740
$9,880
$13,110
$14,250
$15,470
$16,090
$16,610
$17,050
$17,050
$18,270
$19,500
$22,640
$23,950
$25,270
$30,814,280
TOTAL
$12,050
$13,650
$17,840
$19,910
$22,090
$23,170
$24,050
$24,860
$24,860
$27,000
$30,120
$38,090
$40,490
$43,000
$45,463,530
DV

BASIN
$1,370
$1,560
$1,960
$2,340
$2,740
$2,930
$3,080
$3,230
$3,230
$3,610
$4,390
$6,390
$6,840
$7,330
$2,920,790
PIPE
$7,410
$8,370
$11,110
$12,070
$13,110
$13,630
$14,070
$14,440
$14,440
$15,480
$16,510
$19,180
$20,290
$21,400
$9,278,960
TOTAL
$8,780
$9,930
$13,070
$14,410
$15,850
$16,560
$17,150
$17,670
$17,670
$19,090
$20,900
$25,570
$27,130
$28,730
$12,199,750
EF

BASIN
$1,680
$1,920
$2,400
$2,880
$3,360
$3,600
$3,780
$3,970
$3,970
$4,440
$5,400
$7,850
$8,410
$9,010
$3,389,730
PIPE
$1,070
$1,210
$1,610
$1,750
$1,900
$1,970
$2,040
$2,090
$2,090
$2,240
$2,390
$2,780
$2,940
$3,100
$1,701,920
TOTAL
$2,750
$3,130
$4,010
$4,630
$5,260
$5,570
$5,820
$6,060
$6,060
$6,680
$7,790
$10,630
$11,350
$12,110
$5,091,650
EG

BASIN
$900
$1,020
$1,280
$1,530
$1,790
$1,920
$2,010
$2,110
$2,110
$2,360
$2,870
$4,180
$4,480
$4,800
$2,119,330
PIPE
$1,800
$2,040
$2,700
$2,940
$3,190
$3,320
$3,420
$3,510
$3,510
$3,770
$4,020
$4,670
$4,940
$5,210
$3,187,930
TOTAL
$2,700
$3,060
$3,980
$4,470
$4,980
$5,240
$5,430
$5,620
$5,620
$6,130
$6,890
$8,850
$9,420
$10,010
$5,307,260
EH

BASIN
$1,600
$1,820
$2,290
$2,730
$3,200
$3,420
$3,600
$3,770
$3,770
$4,220
$5,130
$7,460
$7,990
$8,570
$5,041,610
PIPE
$2,630
$2,980
$3,950
$4,290
$4,660
$4,850
$5,000
$5,140
$5,140
$5,510
$5,870
$6,820
$7,220
$7,610
$5,214,720
TOTAL
$4,230
$4,800
$6,240
$7,020
$7,860
$8,270
$8,600
$8,910
$8,910
$9,730
$11,000
$14,280
$15,210
$16,180
$10,256,330
EI

BASIN
$4,230
$4,820
$6,040
$7,220
$8,450
$9,040
$9,510
$9,970
$9,970
$11,150
$13,560
$19,730
$21,130
$22,650
$3,512,630
PIPE
$4,760
$5,370
$7,130
$7,750
$8,420
$8,750
$9,030
$9,270
$9,270
$9,940
$10,600
$12,320
$13,030
$13,740
$2,350,020
TOTAL
$8,990
$10,190
$13,170
$14,970
$16,870
$17,790
$18,540
$19,240
$19,240
$21,090
$24,160
$32,050
$34,160
$36,390
$5,862,650
EJ

BASIN
$5,350
$6,090
$7,650
$9,140
$10,690
$11,440
$12,030
$12,620
$12,620
$14,110
$17,160
$24,970
$26,730
$28,660
$5,445,490
PIPE
$6,400
$7,240
$9,610
$10,440
$11,330
$11,780
$12,170
$12,490
$12,490
$13,380
$14,280
$16,590
$17,550
$18,510
$5,632,850
TOTAL
$11,750
$13,330
$17,260
$19,580
$22,020
$23,220
$24,200
$25,110
$25,110
$27,490
$31,440
$41,560
$44,280
$47,170
$11,078,340
EK

BASIN
$410
$460
$580
$690
$810
$870
$910
$960
$960
$1,070
$1,300
$1,890
$2,030
$2,170
$678,550
PIPE
$1,990
$2,250
$2,990
$3,250
$3,530
$3,670
$3,790
$3,880
$3,880
$4,160
$4,440
$5,160
$5,460
$5,760
$2,716,790
TOTAL
$2,400
$2,710
$3,570
$3,940
$4,340
$4,540
$4,700
$4,840
$4,840
$5,230
$5,740
$7,050
$7,490
$7,930
$3,395,340
EL

BASIN
$2,590
$2,950
$3,700
$4,420
$5,170
$5,540
$5,820
$6,110
$6,110
$6,830
$8,310
$12,080
$12,940
$13,870
$1,293,940
PIPE
$1,600
$1,800
$2,390
$2,600
$2,820
$2,940
$3,030
$3,110
$3,110
$3,340
$3,560
$4,130
$4,370
$4,610
$441,940
TOTAL
$4,190
$4,750
$6,090
$7,020
$7,990
$8,480
$8,850
$9,220
$9,220
$10,170
$11,870
$16,210
$17,310
$18,480
$1,735,880
EM

BASIN
$2,450
$2,790
$3,510
$4,190
$4,900
$5,250
$5,520
$5,790
$5,790
$6,470
$7,870
$11,450
$12,260
$13,140
$3,183,630
PIPE
$3,060
$3,450
$4,580
$4,980
$5,410
$5,620
$5,810
$5,960
$5,960
$6,390
$6,810
$7,910
$8,370
$8,830
$3,062,570
TOTAL
$5,510
$6,240
$8,090
$9,170
$10,310
$10,870
$11,330
$11,750
$11,750
$12,860
$14,680
$19,360
$20,630
$21,970
$6,246,200
9 of 14
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
Fresno County
106
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 1: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
EN

BASIN
$1,980
$2,250
$2,830
$3,380
$3,960
$4,230
$4,450
$4,670
$4,670
$5,220
$6,350
$9,240
$9,890
$10,600
$4,091,020
PIPE
$7,490
$8,470
$11,240
$12,210
$13,260
$13,790
$14,240
$14,610
$14,610
$15,660
$16,710
$19,410
$20,530
$21,660
$10,316,170
TOTAL
$9,470
$10,720
$14,070
$15,590
$17,220
$18,020
$18,690
$19,280
$19,280
$20,880
$23,060
$28,650
$30,420
$32,260
$14,407,190
EO

BASIN
$3,310
$3,780
$4,740
$5,670
$6,630
$7,090
$7,460
$7,820
$7,820
$8,750
$10,640
$15,470
$16,570
$17,760
$5,585,350
PIPE
$3,190
$3,600
$4,790
$5,200
$5,650
$5,870
$6,060
$6,220
$6,220
$6,670
$7,110
$8,260
$8,740
$9,220
$4,460,570
TOTAL
$6,500
$7,380
$9,530
$10,870
$12,280
$12,960
$13,520
$14,040
$14,040
$15,420
$17,750
$23,730
$25,310
$26,980
$10,045,920
NN

BASIN
$1,950
$2,220
$2,790
$3,330
$3,900
$4,170
$4,380
$4,600
$4,600
$5,140
$6,250
$9,100
$9,740
$10,440
$4,891,340
PIPE
$5,890
$6,660
$8,840
$9,610
$10,430
$10,850
$11,200
$11,490
$11,490
$12,320
$13,140
$15,270
$16,150
$17,030
$11,482,330
TOTAL
$7,840
$8,880
$11,630
$12,940
$14,330
$15,020
$15,580
$16,090
$16,090
$17,460
$19,390
$24,370
$25,890
$27,470
$16,373,670
1G

BASIN
$1,270
$1,440
$1,810
$2,170
$2,530
$2,710
$2,850
$2,990
$2,990
$3,340
$4,060
$5,910
$6,330
$6,790
$1,872,020
PIPE
$1,200
$1,350
$1,800
$1,950
$2,120
$2,200
$2,270
$2,330
$2,330
$2,500
$2,670
$3,100
$3,280
$3,460
$1,543,320
TOTAL
$2,470
$2,790
$3,610
$4,120
$4,650
$4,910
$5,120
$5,320
$5,320
$5,840
$6,730
$9,010
$9,610
$10,250
$3,415,340
3G

BASIN
$2,040
$2,330
$2,920
$3,490
$4,080
$4,370
$4,590
$4,820
$4,820
$5,390
$6,550
$9,530
$10,200
$10,940
$4,368,720
PIPE
$2,570
$2,910
$3,860
$4,190
$4,550
$4,730
$4,890
$5,010
$5,010
$5,370
$5,730
$6,660
$7,050
$7,430
$4,640,440
TOTAL
$4,610
$5,240
$6,780
$7,680
$8,630
$9,100
$9,480
$9,830
$9,830
$10,760
$12,280
$16,190
$17,250
$18,370
$9,009,160
7C

BASIN
$2,030
$2,310
$2,900
$3,460
$4,050
$4,340
$4,560
$4,780
$4,780
$5,350
$6,500
$9,460
$10,130
$10,860
$3,969,560
PIPE
$1,230
$1,390
$1,850
$2,010
$2,180
$2,270
$2,340
$2,400
$2,400
$2,570
$2,750
$3,190
$3,370
$3,560
$1,734,900
TOTAL
$3,260
$3,700
$4,750
$5,470
$6,230
$6,610
$6,900
$7,180
$7,180
$7,920
$9,250
$12,650
$13,500
$14,420
$5,704,460
7D

BASIN
$2,540
$2,900
$3,630
$4,350
$5,080
$5,440
$5,720
$6,000
$6,000
$6,710
$8,160
$11,870
$12,710
$13,620
$4,456,650
PIPE
$1,850
$2,090
$2,770
$3,010
$3,270
$3,400
$3,510
$3,610
$3,610
$3,870
$4,120
$4,790
$5,070
$5,350
$2,243,900
TOTAL
$4,390
$4,990
$6,400
$7,360
$8,350
$8,840
$9,230
$9,610
$9,610
$10,580
$12,280
$16,660
$17,780
$18,970
$6,700,550
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n No. 2005-480 A
mended 2018-908
& 2021-979.
7H

BASIN
$3,360
$3,830
$4,800
$5,740
$6,720
$7,190
$7,560
$7,920
$7,920
$8,860
$10,780
$15,680
$16,790
$18,000
$7,792,210
PIPE
$5,810
$6,570
$8,720
$9,480
$10,290
$10,700
$11,050
$11,340
$11,340
$12,150
$12,970
$15,060
$15,930
$16,800
$9,433,700
TOTAL
$9,170
$10,400
$13,520
$15,220
$17,010
$17,890
$18,610
$19,260
$19,260
$21,010
$23,750
$30,740
$32,720
$34,800
$17,225,910
*Note:

A surcharge fee
is in effect per
Board Resolutio
n No. 2005-480 A
mended 2018-908
& 2021-979.
10 of 14
2025 FMFCD
3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025
Fresno County
107
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total
OO $3,149,221 $899,643 $4,048,864
PP $2,279,786 $1,232,767 $3,512,553
RR $5,672,640 $18,578,852 $24,251,492
SS $3,200,285 $4,191,719 $7,392,004
TT $2,673,474 $1,843,428 $4,516,902
UU1 $747,282 $1,383,868 $2,131,150
UU2 $1,815,483 $1,664,639 $3,480,122
UU3 $4,297,237 $11,436,261 $15,733,498
VV $307,124 $116,961 $424,085
WW $291,653 $360,044 $651,697
XX $1,025,092 $2,177,108 $3,202,200
ZZ $2,995,111 $3,415,154 $6,410,265
Planned Local Drainage Areas: Zone 2
Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total
X $2,257,718 $449,072 $2,706,790
Y $1,714,229 $2,274,773 $3,989,002
Z $1,126,945 $2,543,686 $3,670,631 **
AA $1,007,845 $1,444,258 $2,452,103
BB $817,452 $822,774 $1,640,226
CC $1,131,025 $2,087,079 $3,218,104
CO2 $947,253 $1,742,103 $2,689,356
DD $2,683,022 $7,744,571 $10,427,593
EE $754,118 $3,373,882 $4,128,000
FF $1,442,268 $9,623,346 $11,065,614
GG $3,032,358 $1,657,509 $4,689,867
HH $5,862,906 $7,672,820 $13,535,726
II1 $5,984,056 $17,011,910 $22,995,966
II2 $9,806,468 $1,389,416 $11,195,884
II3 $2,269,686 $1,880,276 $4,149,962
II4 $2,643,383 $1,159,909 $3,803,292
JJ $2,526,157 $3,874,763 $6,400,920
KK $2,541,765 $1,537,976 $4,079,741
LL $3,032,488 $3,884,297 $6,916,785
MM $611,890 $950,198 $1,562,088
Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total
A $2,653,480 $2,140,187 $4,793,667
B $1,296,438 $142,170 $1,438,608
C $479,953 $317,414 $797,367
D $801,395 $689,353 $1,490,748
E $987,771 $228,063 $1,215,834
F $327,718 $302,016 $629,734
G $1,688,391 $157,007 $1,845,398
H $99,858 $214,682 $314,540
I $227,828 $248,025 $475,853
J $1,880,431 $510,964 $2,391,395
K $1,312,067 $685,069 $1,997,136
L $761,681 $494,850 $1,256,531
M $967,464 $265,529 $1,232,993
N $535,530 $436,070 $971,600
O $1,227,150 $190,138 $1,417,288
P $1,027,751 $235,116 $1,262,867
T $2,128,728 $2,752,032 $4,880,760
U $1,890,650 $697,216 $2,587,866
V $976,218 $1,726,395 $2,702,613
W $2,211,300 $3,693,138 $5,904,438 *
W * Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution No. 885-BPBR.

Z ** Note: A surcharge fee is in effect per Board Resolution Nos. 1227, 1265, 1268, 1386.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 2: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O A1, A2, RR R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40% R-1 45% R-1 50% R-2, M-H R-3 R-4, T-P M-1, M-2, M-3, C-R, M-1-P, S-L
C-P, C-M, R-P C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
Zone 2 BASIN $920 $1,050 $1,320 $1,580 $1,850 $1,980 $2,080 $2,180 $2,180 $2,440 $2,970 $4,320 $4,620 $4,950 $104,129,222 PIPE $1,730 $1,950 $2,590 $2,820 $3,060 $3,180 $3,280 $3,370 $3,370 $3,610 $3,850 $4,470 $4,730 $4,990 $136,550,496 TOTAL $2,650 $3,000 $3,910 $4,400 $4,910 $5,160 $5,360 $5,550 $5,550 $6,050 $6,820 $8,790 $9,350 $9,940 $240,679,718 11 of 142025 FMFCD3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025Fresno County
108
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Planned Local Drainage Areas: Zone 3
Area Basin Cost Pipe Cost Total
Q $436,210 $420,268 $856,478
S $1,287,650 $2,428,339 $3,715,989
1E $2,200,042 $952,712 $3,152,754
2D $840,485 $1,591,200 $2,431,685
3A $1,511,791 $1,014,241 $2,526,032
3D $1,437,873 $1,032,196 $2,470,069
3F $1,139,750 $1,224,524 $2,364,274
4B $2,179,796 $1,124,616 $3,304,412
4C $1,678,770 $2,386,729 $4,065,499
4D $3,710,620 $1,165,436 $4,876,056
4E $4,232,706 $2,241,337 $6,474,043
5B/5C $5,019,048 $2,282,376 $7,301,424
5F $1,658,490 $1,530,399 $3,188,889
6D $1,510,672 $1,565,845 $3,076,517
Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR ZONE 3: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O A1, A2, RR R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40% R-1 45% R-1 50% R-2, M-H R-3 R-4, T-P M-1, M-2, M-3, C-R, M-1-P, S-L
C-P, C-M, R-P C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
Total Cost
Zone 3 BASIN $1,560 $1,780 $2,230 $2,670 $3,120 $3,340 $3,520 $3,690 $3,690 $4,120 $5,020 $7,300 $7,810 $8,370 $28,843,903 PIPE $1,590 $1,790 $2,380 $2,590 $2,810 $2,920 $3,010 $3,090 $3,090 $3,320 $3,540 $4,110 $4,350 $4,590 $20,960,218 TOTAL $3,150 $3,570 $4,610 $5,260 $5,930 $6,260 $6,530 $6,780 $6,780 $7,440 $8,560 $11,410 $12,160 $12,960 $49,804,121 12 of 142025 FMFCD3/2025
Effective Date: 3/1/2025Fresno County
109
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Area
DRAINAGE FEE SCHEDULE FOR SURCHARGE AREAS: PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE AREAS AE-5, A-L, O
A1, A2, RR
R-1-E, R-1-EH,
R-A
R-1-A, R-1-AH
R-1-B, R-1-C,
RE
R-1 40%
R-1 45%
R-1 50%
R-2, M-H
R-3
R-4, T-P
M-1, M-2, M-3,
C-R, M-1-P, S-L

C-P, C-M, R-P
C-1, C-2, C-3,
C-4, C-5, C-6,
C-L, P
W

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$11,075
-
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 885-BPBR

Z

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$1,970
$2,110
$2,250
$2,615
$5,380
$2,915
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1386

BX

TOTAL
-
$270
$360
$390
$430
$445
$445
$445
$470
$510
$540
$630
$660
$700
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2008-590

BX

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$18,100
-
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2017-884

CM

TOTAL
$90
$105
$135
$145
$160
$165
$165
$165
$175
$185
$200
$235
$485
$260
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1228

CN

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$2,200
$2,395
$2,695
$3,465
$3,690
$3,925
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 1422

DE

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
$790
$790
$790
$840
$900
-
$1,120
$1,250
$1,250
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2006-486

DN

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
$12,460
$12,860
$13,200
$13,200
-
-
-
-
$19,570
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2017-884

DO

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$4,820
$4,820
$5,170
$5,170
-
$6,770
$7,140
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2018-887

DO

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$5,280
$5,280
-
-
$7,300
*Note:

Surcharge Resolu
tion: 2020-959

7D

TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$7,307
-
*Note: