Clovis City Council
August 10, 2026

2 unfortunately that is not how the world works. If you keep doing this to your tax paying residents, eventually you will have no revenue with which to pay for this city, the employee salaries, or the school district. I can't tell you the number of neighbors and friends who I have had conversations with that feel this very way. They all say the same, if this is what is going to happen, it is time to leave the area and probably the state. The novel Atlas Shrugged was a powerful warning from historical experience against this type of behavior.

I appreciate you taking the time to consider my concerns and suggestions. I would be happy to discuss and expand if you would like to set up a time to talk. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Have a great evening!
Sincerely,

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2026 8:58 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = David Zoldoske
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = 878 N Whittier Avenue
textarea-1755209560293 = Mr. McKencie, my property shares a common fenceline with the proposed high density development (#63) near Alluvial and Fowler Avenue - I have two questions, first has there been any direct discussion with owner about developing the property into apartments? and second, does the review process allow for public comments before the project would be approved? If so, what does that process look like?
Thank you for time and consideration
regards
David Zoldoske
Client IP = 76.137.216.252

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 10:29 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Susan Colby
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = N Hughes Ave., Clovis, CA 93612
textarea-1755209560293 = We are very much OPPOSED to rezoning area 108 for multi housing structures. It is a small area with a bank and office building close. Furthermore, with the auto sales businesses going in across the street, the traffic on Clovis Ave will already be multiplied. Behind the proposed area are homes that have been there for 45 years. It is a well established neighborhood, very calm and quiet. Those that have homes that line up to the proposed property will suddenly have to start worrying about potential people coming over fences, debri, noise, etc. We already have a very disruptive person living on Clovis Ave (code enforcement is fining) for their space and disruptive behavior. Please do not approve this area for multi level low income housing. It will very likely drop the property values of the neighborhood also.

Client IP = 146.75.154.0

1 McKencie Perez
From: Christopher Valadez < >
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 6:39 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Public Comment on the Infill Rezone Program – Continued Opposition to Rezoning Sites Adjacent to Harlan Ranch (Specifically Site 115 and the Parcel at the Northwest Corner of Owens Mountain Parkway and DeWolf Avenue)
Re: Formal Public Comment on the Infill Rezone Program – Continued Opposition to Rezoning Sites Adjacent to Harlan Ranch (Specifically Site 115 and the Parcel at the Northwest Corner of Owens Mountain Parkway and DeWolf Avenue)
Dear Ms. Perez:

Thank you for the notification regarding the proposed Infill Rezone Program. As a homeowner and resident of Harlan Ranch (a master-planned community of over 1,500 single-family homes), I previously submitted written comments on February 3, 2026. I write now as continued formal public comment on the program in direct response to your notice, ahead of the May 28, 2026 Planning Commission hearing. I remain supportive of the City’s efforts to comply with the Martinez v. City of Clovis judgment and the sixth-cycle Housing Element (certified December 2024), which require capacity for approximately 1,284– 1,300 additional affordable units to address unmet lower-income RHNA obligations. However, I strongly oppose the proposed rezoning of peripheral sites adjacent to Harlan Ranch—specifically Site 115 (approximately 7 acres at the southwest corner, proposed for R-3 zoning allowing up to 30 units per acre and three-story apartments) and the parcel at the northwest corner of Owens Mountain Parkway and DeWolf Avenue—to high-density R-3 zoning. These sites are fundamentally incompatible with the area’s character, infrastructure, and state planning priorities.2041 The City’s own Infill Rezone Program documentation and the Housing Element describe these as “infill” sites, yet they fall far short of state definitions and preferences for true infill development. Harlan Ranch is a suburban, master-planned, low-density single-family community on the outskirts of Clovis, governed by a 2010 Master Plan and HOA CC&Rs that explicitly emphasize controlled density, family-oriented design, shared parks, playgrounds, and landscaping. Rezoning to R-3 (high-density, up to 30 du/ac with three-story buildings) would introduce an abrupt, incompatible scale—potentially 210+ units on Site 115 alone—that clashes with the neighborhood’s low-density character and burdens HOA-funded amenities without proportional contribution from new residents.

These sites are vehicle-dependent with limited transit, resulting in high Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).

Clovis Transit service in the eastern Harlan Ranch area remains limited (even with recent micro-transit additions), and residents rely heavily on personal vehicles for jobs, services, schools, and amenities.

This directly contradicts HCD’s Sites Inventory Guidebook best practices for lower-income RHNA sites, which prioritize proximity to transit, jobs, high-performing schools, healthcare, grocery stores, and amenities to promote walkability, reduce VMT, advance equitable housing, and support climate goals (consistent with SB 743). Peripheral edge locations like these score poorly on HCD suitability factors and fail to exemplify “true infill” as expanded under recent laws such as AB 130 (CEQA exemption for qualifying urban infill projects up to 20 acres) and SB 772 (expanding infill definitions to urbanized areas).

In contrast, central/downtown parcels or those along major avenues better align with these mandates

2 and successful Clovis examples like Butterfly Gardens (supportive housing) and Solivita Commons (affordable family units).

Traffic and infrastructure impacts are already documented concerns. Owens Mountain Parkway, Shepherd Avenue, and nearby Highway 168/Owens Mountain interchanges experience peak-hour congestion and delays (exacerbated by events and growth), as noted in public comments, General Plan analyses, and media coverage of the program. Adding high-density units would worsen Level of Service, safety risks, and VMT without adequate mitigation. Local Clovis Unified School District schools serving the area face record enrollment pressures (approximately 43,000 students citywide) and capacity constraints, with new schools planned but not yet alleviating near-term strain from family-oriented units.

These gaps undermine the legislative intent of the Housing Element Law (Gov. Code §§ 65580–65589.8) and Martinez requirements for adequate, suitable sites with realistic development potential (Gov. Code § 65583.2).

State law and the City’s adopted plans require sites to be “adequate” and suitable, considering infrastructure, realistic capacity, neighborhood character, and Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) principles. The 2010 Harlan Ranch Master Plan and General Plan prioritize low-density residential stability and family-oriented living in planned communities. Dense development here would undermine these policies, reduce quality of life for existing residents, and risk long-term incompatibility. Residents prefer—and the record supports—development that protects established neighborhoods while meeting housing goals.

Alternatives
I urge the City to:

1. Prioritize more centrally located opportunity sites from the Housing Element inventory (e.g., downtown or along major avenues). These better meet HCD criteria, reduce VMT, leverage existing transit/infrastructure, and align with AB 130/SB 772 infill preferences, minimizing legal and practical risks.

2. If any peripheral/edge sites must be used, restrict rezoning and development to senior or agerestricted housing only. This would address Clovis’s senior housing shortage, reduce traffic impacts by an estimated 20–30% (fewer school/commute trips), eliminate school capacity strain, and lower demands on community amenities—fully consistent with HCD guidelines on specialneeds housing and equitable distribution.

These alternatives are feasible, as the Housing Element identifies suitable central parcels and the program allows for tailored zoning/conditions. The City must fully evaluate them under state law to demonstrate compliance.

Risks of Under-Evaluating Alternatives
Selecting unsuitable peripheral sites without robust alternatives analysis exposes the City to significant risks:
• Further litigation or HCD findings of non-compliance (echoing Martinez, where inadequate zoning/density and site suitability led to the judgment). • Delayed or unrealized affordable housing production.
• CEQA challenges, community opposition delays (already evident in public meetings), and infrastructure costs borne by taxpayers/residents.

3 • Undermining AFFH goals and efficient RHNA progress, potentially inviting enforcement actions under AB 1398 or related statutes.

A thorough record of alternatives analysis, traffic/school studies, and master-plan consistency review is essential to avoid these outcomes and ensure defensible, sustainable compliance.

I respectfully request that the City reconsider and exclude (or heavily condition) the Harlan Ranchadjacent sites, prioritize truly suitable central infill alternatives, and provide a detailed written response addressing these points. This balanced approach will advance state mandates while preserving the character and livability of established communities like Harlan Ranch.

Thank you for your attention and for your service in balancing housing needs with community protection.

I look forward to your response and continued public engagement.

Sincerely,
Christopher Valadez
Clovis, CA 93619
Harlan Ranch Homeowner

1 McKencie Perez
From: Andrew Haussler
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2026 7:54 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Cc: Renee Mathis; George González
Subject: FW: Public Comment Submission
For the file.

Thanks
Andrew Haussler
City Manager
Office: 559-324-2060
[email protected]
From: No Reply <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2026 10:00 AM
To: Andrew Haussler <[email protected]>
Subject: Public Comment Submission
Submitted by: Susan Thompson
Email Address:

Commented on event: https://clovisca.portal.civicclerk.com/event/51/overview If you are having trouble viewing the URL above, cut and paste the string into your browser window.

User comment: I am writing as a concerned resident of Clovis to urge you to recommend denial of the proposed rezoning for Lots 157 and 197 as part of the City's Infill Rezone Program. While I recognize the legal obligations stemming from the Desiree Martinez v. City of Clovis settlement to accommodate additional housing capacity, I believe these specific parcels are poorly suited for high-density (R-3 or R-4) rezoning and would impose disproportionate harms on the surrounding established neighborhoods. The Infill Rezone Program targets underutilized parcels to help meet state housing requirements by redesignating them for high- and very high-density residential uses. However, approving rezoning for Lots 157 and 197 would fundamentally change the character of the nearby single-family residential areas.

These neighborhoods have long been defined by low-density homes, providing a sense of openness, privacy, and community cohesion that residents value highly. Introducing multi-family developments here would erode this suburban character, increase noise and activity levels, and create an incompatible transition that disrupts the established fabric of the area. Traffic concerns are particularly acute for these lots. Their proximity to major thoroughfares and freeway access points means rezoning to high density could funnel significantly more vehicles into already congested residential streets. This influx would worsen peak-hour backups, heighten risks to pedestrians and children, and strain local roadways not designed for such volumes. Without assured major infrastructure improvements, these changes would degrade quality of life and safety for current residents. Moreover, rezoning these specific parcels would contribute to an unfair concentration of high-density housing in certain parts of Clovis. The program includes 20 sites citywide, but approving Lots 157 and 197 would place an outsized burden on the neighborhoods immediately adjacent to them, while other areas remain less affected. This uneven

2 distribution exacerbates inequities, overburdening local schools, parks, utilities, and emergency services in already impacted zones. Additional issues include potential strains on infrastructure—such as water, sewer, and schools—that may not readily scale to support hundreds of new residents per site.

Environmental effects, including loss of open space and increased stormwater runoff or pollution from denser development, further weigh against approval. Property values in surrounding homes could also suffer, impacting longtime homeowners' equity and the overall stability of the community. I respectfully ask that you, as a representative on the Planning Commission, carefully consider these site-specific impacts and recommend against rezoning Lots 157 and 197. Alternatives, such as prioritizing other parcels with better compatibility or lower-density options where feasible, would better balance housing needs with neighborhood preservation. Thank you for your time and dedication to thoughtful planning in Clovis. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this further and can be reached at [ ].

Please keep me updated on the status of the Infill Rezone Program and any upcoming hearings.

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2026 8:27 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Peggy Davis
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = PO Box 3615
textarea-1755209560293 = Dear McKencie Perez,
I am a resident of Bonaventure Mobile Home Park at 1724 Minnewawa, Space 213. I am well aware of the need for better low-cost housing. Having lived here since 2007, I have come to know mobile homes well and realize that there was a huge code change in 1980. Most of the mobile homes here were built before then.

One basic problem with MHs is that they are on inadequate foundations. Because the ground underneath settles over time, the house goes "out of level". The walls and flooring starts to rise and fall in different places. The walls can crack, the countertops can buckle or crack. My point is, "mobile" homes are fairly ridiculous things to put in!
Years ago, we had a manager, Randall Guerra, who took it upon himself to have a new home put in whenever the park 'inherited' a MH from someone who passed away with no provisions made and often, in arrears on monthly rent, so the space could be filled by the park and then the new house sold to a new resident. Unfortunately, the park owners no longer make that effort, so the place gets more rundown every year just because these old MHs get older. Covid took Randall and we miss him.

I urge you to think about manufactured housing in the city’s Infill program, but NOT mobile homes. I do think this is one of the few areas in the country where MHs are not going to blow away due to tornadoes (yet). I would not live in a MH anywhere else. But a good manufactured home, on a solid foundation, solar-equipped and wheelchair accessible would definitely beat a MH any day. I think the city could do these in a park-like setting, with a manager, and a wellness program, and do very well.

I am a semi-retired CPA and very interested in the Infill Rezone Program. I wish you success in making these improvements to the city attractive and useful. There are so many people who cannot afford decent housing, but if they could -- if more were available -- would be productive families, contributing to the city.

Blessings to you.

Client IP = 73.220.186.183

1 McKencie Perez
From: Manbir Gill < >
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 12:05 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Clovis infill rezoning
Good afternoon Ms. Perez
Rezoning two adjacent parcels, 157 & 197 will unduly affect the surrounding area as many residents having been waiting and bought with the hope that the commercial lot will eventually have a small grocery/convenience store and services. Please consider our humble request as it is a food desert out there and no barber shops etc either.

Please consider rezoning the already residential (low density) to high density while leaving the commercial as such. It will allow services that will well serve that area in the long run.

Warm regards
Manbir S Gill
Sent from my iPhone

P.O. Box 1432 Clovis, CA 93613 | 559.289.1090 | [email protected] | www.krollandassociates.com May 22, 2026
Clovis Planning Commission
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, California, 93612
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Consideration of the Infill Rezone Program Sites 595, 596, 597.

Chairman and Members of the Clovis Planning Commission:

I represent Kenneth Crawford, owner of proposed Infill Rezone sites 595, 596 and 597. We support the redesignation and rezoning of the subject sites as proposed by Clovis’ Planning and Development Services staff.

The Crawford family are longtime residents of the Clovis area and have owned portions of this site since 1985. They have maintained several rental houses there over the years and it has always been their desire to develop a quality independent senior residential village at this location. The proposed infill rezoning program recommended by staff will greatly assist in moving forward with this project.

We respectfully request that the Planning Commission support staff’s recommendation in assigning R-4 (Very High Density Residential) Zoning to the subject sites.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have.

Sincerely,

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2026 6:16 PM
To: Aaron La Mattina
Cc: McKencie Perez
Subject: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC COMMENT
date-1745483708617 = 2026-05-28
text-1745483711071 = Government Code Section 65759 GPA 2024-003 text-1745483712599 = Rob Rahal
text-1745483713055 =
textarea-1745483714111 = Concern here obviates a traffic pattern study. This may be included in the Environment Assessment, but is very important to the quality of life and potential increase in crime and potential need for Clovis Police and Sheriff patrol. Recommend that considerations for appropriate road widths and lanes be part of the assessment.

Client IP = 73.90.12.228

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2026 6:23 PM
To: Aaron La Mattina
Cc: McKencie Perez
Subject: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC COMMENT
date-1745483708617 = 2026-05-28
text-1745483711071 = R2024-002
text-1745483712599 = Rob Rahal
text-1745483713055 =
textarea-1745483714111 = Consideration for the Environmental Assessment. With the Master Plan to redesignate and develop High Density and Multifamily High Density dwelling units, the potential for crowding and increase in potential crime rates. The need for increased Clovis Police and Sheriff patrols may be necessary. Also the potential the the esthetics in the community would be compromised.

Client IP = 73.90.12.228

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2026 6:29 PM
To: Aaron La Mattina
Cc: McKencie Perez
Subject: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC COMMENT
date-1745483708617 = 2026-05-28
text-1745483711071 = Government Code Section 65759 GPA 2024-003 text-1745483712599 = Rob Rahal
text-1745483713055 =
textarea-1745483714111 = With the development of High Density Multifamily dwellings, what are the property tax implications. How will they be determined and by who. Also consider water usage for that many dwellings and whether or not the water levels could sustain that increase. There is also the upkeep of the common areas. That will be much more challenging. Thank you for your time.

Client IP = 73.90.12.228

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 8:23 PM
To: Aaron La Mattina
Cc: McKencie Perez
Subject: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC COMMENT
date-1745483708617 = 2026-05-28
text-1745483711071 = 3
text-1745483712599 = Ciarán Jones
text-1745483713055 =
textarea-1745483714111 = Subject: Opposition: Clovis Infill Rezone Program - Sites 197 and 157 Dear Mayor Mouanoutoua, Honorable Members of the Clovis City Council, Members of the Clovis Planning Commission, and Deputy City Planner Perez,I am writing on behalf of my parents, Gerard and Sarah Jones, owners and residents at Whiteash Ave ( ), to express their strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of Site 157 and Site 197. These sites, located in northeast Clovis at the corners of De Wolf and Owens Mountain Parkway, are being considered under the Infill Rezone Program for High-Density Residential use (R-3). This email was also submitted as public comment for the May 28th session of the Planning Commission, which we were unfortunately unable to attend.We strongly urge the Planning Commission to remove Sites 157 and 197 from the Infill Rezone Program site list. Barring this removal, we urge the City Council to reject any rezoning plan that includes these proposed changes in zoning.The proposed rezone represents a jarring departure from the established vision set forth in the City of Clovis General Plan. These sites were never designed, intended, or structurally situated to absorb R-3 multi-family residential densities. Shifting from the existing mixeduse village and very low-density residential usage is a drastic change well beyond anything accounted for in the surrounding neighborhood design.The existing street infrastructure surrounding Sites 157 and 197 is not designed for and is incapable of safely handling the massive influx of traffic generated by highdensity complexes. Intended primarily for low-density residential access, the local roads, intersections, and neighborhood streets are already constrained. In particular, the critical intersection at De Wolf and Owens Mountain Parkway is already heavily impacted. Upzoning these sites will trigger severe traffic congestion, peak-hour gridlock, and elevated safety risks for pedestrians and local cyclists. Dropping high-occupancy developments into an area lacking major arterial capacity is fundamentally irresponsible.Beyond these immediate traffic deficiencies, high-density zoning demands a robust network of supporting public infrastructure and nearby transit options. Placing R-3 zoning in this specific location will result in a massive increase to vehicle miles traveled (VMT), running in direct defiance to the intent of regional environmental goals and sustainable urban growth.Sincerely,Ciarán Jones On behalf of Gerard and Sarah Jones
Whiteash Ave, Clovis
Email:

Client IP = 68.254.250.171

1 McKencie Perez
From: Ciaran Jones < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 8:24 PM
To: McKencie Perez; Vong Mouanoutoua; Diane Pearce; Lynne Ashbeck; Matt Basgall; Drew Bessinger
Subject: Opposition: Clovis Infill Rezone Program - Sites 197 and 157 Dear Mayor Mouanoutoua, Honorable Members of the Clovis City Council, Members of the Clovis Planning Commission, and Deputy City Planner Perez,
I am writing on behalf of my parents, Gerard and Sarah Jones, owners and residents at Whiteash Ave ( ), to express their strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of Site 157 and Site 197. These sites, located in northeast Clovis at the corners of De Wolf and Owens Mountain Parkway, are being considered under the Infill Rezone Program for HighDensity Residential use (R-3). This email was also submitted as public comment for the May 28th session of the Planning Commission, which we were unfortunately unable to attend.

We strongly urge the Planning Commission to remove Sites 157 and 197 from the Infill Rezone Program site list. Barring this removal, we urge the City Council to reject any rezoning plan that includes these proposed changes in zoning.

The proposed rezone represents a jarring departure from the established vision set forth in the City of Clovis General Plan. These sites were never designed, intended, or structurally situated to absorb R3 multi-family residential densities. Shifting from the existing mixed-use village and very low-density residential usage is a drastic change well beyond anything accounted for in the surrounding neighborhood design.

The existing street infrastructure surrounding Sites 157 and 197 is not designed for and is incapable of safely handling the massive influx of traffic generated by high-density complexes. Intended primarily for low-density residential access, the local roads, intersections, and neighborhood streets are already constrained. In particular, the critical intersection at De Wolf and Owens Mountain Parkway is already heavily impacted. Upzoning these sites will trigger severe traffic congestion, peakhour gridlock, and elevated safety risks for pedestrians and local cyclists. Dropping high-occupancy developments into an area lacking major arterial capacity is fundamentally irresponsible.

Beyond these immediate traffic deficiencies, high-density zoning demands a robust network of supporting public infrastructure and nearby transit options. Placing R-3 zoning in this specific location will result in a massive increase to vehicle miles traveled (VMT), running in direct defiance to the intent of regional environmental goals and sustainable urban growth.

Sincerely,
Ciarán Jones
On behalf of Gerard and Sarah Jones
N. Whiteash Ave, Clovis
Email:

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2026 9:27 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Angela Collins Kismet
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = N Broadbent Ln
textarea-1755209560293 = I have serious concerns regarding a high density housing development being built at Owen's Mt. and DeWolf. This area cannot handle this type of development. Bud Rank Elementary cannot handle the additional students. Many of us purchased homes in this area for the low traffic and quiet neighborhood. Changes to this area will have many of us relocating.

Client IP = 50.147.117.18

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2026 11:53 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Emily Hunt
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = Sample Ave
textarea-1755209560293 = Just a quick question as I have not been part of this type of occurrence before. What happens with the homes that are in the infill rezone squares? Is the city at risk of not meeting the needs from the court ruling if those tenants decide not to sell? Client IP = 76.20.90.97

1 McKencie Perez
From: Grace Nelson < >
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2026 7:42 AM
To: Vong Mouanoutoua; Diane Pearce; Matt Basgall; Lynne Ashbeck; Drew Bessinger; McKencie Perez
Subject: Re: Infill Court Decision (Dez Martinez v. City of Clovis) Court-Mandated Housing Program
Hello, All:

It was a great meeting on May 28, 2026. Thank you for all your efforts.

It seems clear that the rezoning will happen, but there's one topic I don't believe anyone brought up regarding the two lots located at De Wolf Ave. and Owens Mountain Parkway and that is to please consider building senior living above anything else, please.

Thank you for your attention, Grace Nelson.

On Sun, Feb 8, 2026 at 9:04 AM Grace Nelson < > wrote:

Dear Ladies & Gentlemen:

I have been made aware of the Infill Court Decision (Dez Martinez vs. City of Clovis) that may directly affect me and my community in Clovis, CA, and more specifically Harlan Ranch, which is directly across the street from the potential rezoning project(s). As part of this effort, the City of Clovis has identified 20 properties for potential rezoning to R-3 (medium-high density residential), with a few sites proposed as R-4:
•• Site 115: Approximately 7 acres located at the southwest corner of Harlan Ranch, proposed to be rezoned to R-3, allowing up to 30 units per acre and three-story apartment development. •• Additional nearby property: The northwest corner of Owens Mountain Parkway and DeWolf Avenue, immediately west of an existing home, is also proposed for R-3 zoning.

If this rezoning occurs, and the housing developments are built, it will greatly affect me and my community.

One option that has been discussed by me and other residents of Harlan Ranch is that any development at these sites be restricted to senior housing, which could help mitigate several potential impacts, including:
• Reduced traffic congestion
• No impact on local schools
• Lower demand on community amenities by non-residents
• Addressing the current shortage of senior housing in Clovis Please consider building senior housing, above anything else, in the above-described locations.

Thank you for your attention,
Concerned Clovis, CA, Resident, Grace Nelon ( )

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2026 7:18 PM
To: Aaron La Mattina
Cc: McKencie Perez
Subject: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC COMMENT
date-1745483708617 = 2026-06-25
text-1745483711071 = June 25th agenda not yet posted
text-1745483712599 = Ankara Lee
text-1745483713055 =
textarea-1745483714111 = Regarding the low income housing plans for Owens Mountain Parkway in Clovis near Harlan Ranch
I understand the city is reacting to a lawsuit against Clovis for the lack of mixed housing throughout the city
However the longterm impacts of mixing low income housing in areas of Clovis where we want to keep decades of future home buyers coming and being able to sell properties at their highest value is important. The short term gain of placing low incoming housing in this area will only have longterm negative impacts that will never rebound from this decision. What areas of Clovis are left where homes will continue to bring in higher property taxes to fund all the other projects as minimum wage to fix city still increase.

The planned low income housing may have plans to look nice and modern but ptoential homebuys will be deterred by it. I know there is new developments going up and those properties will lend money to the city but Clovis residents are proud to live here. The people will lose hope in the city and those people who make improtant decisions because the people aren’t valued or heard.

Besides the quick resolution with negative outcomes - is there anything else that can be considered to keep high values to more homes (such as those in Harlan Ranch) and the spirit of the residents alive — where we want to care about how we treat our city and their neighbors? Pretty soon this city will look like Fresno and no one ever says they want to move or live in Fresno Can we possibly reserve this piece of land for senior citizen housing / community? Or small mom and pop stores (similar to Old Town Clovis) with housing located above the shops? I’m not too familiar with all the laws/etc - however are there any other avenues up for consideration? Thank you for your time in reading this and I hope that there is something else we can do with this area Client IP = 108.227.94.245

1 McKencie Perez
From: Rebecca Simonian
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2026 11:43 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Cc: Briana Parra
Subject: FW: Where do I start?
Good morning,
Please see the email below which should be included in your citizen comments for the July 6th meeting, for the Infill Rezone Program item.

Thank you,
Rebecca Simonian
Executive Assistant
Office: 559-324-2060
[email protected]
From: Alice Silverman < >
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2026 9:19 AM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Subject: Where do I start?
RE: Lot 72
We’ve lived on W Kenosha Ave for over 28 years. We remember when Willow and Nees were only 2 lanes and the corner of Willow and Nees was undeveloped. So we’ve seen a lot of change - mostly good. We’re writing to share some history about Lot 72 as rezoning it to R3 or R4 would be disastrous to our neighborhood.

Lot 72 originally had just one home on it. When the owner passed away, the spouse sold it to the current owner, orthodontist. He told us from the beginning that he wanted to build a family compound on the land and shared his plans with us as he wanted to build and orthodontist building that contains office space as well. He went on about how being across from the Buchanan Complex would bring him a lot of business - all those teeth to straighten. Well, here we are many years later and it doesn’t appear that the business is thriving at this location. He has several around the valley, we understand. Nor did the family compound ever get built.

In the meantime, we’ve had to contend with the parking lot noise, pop-up business on Saturdays, hour long clearing of the parking lot by the gardener using a handheld blower, smokers of all sorts (not just tobacco). A broken sprinkler on their side of the wall flooded our yard. We called the orthodontist office asking for help and were referred to the sprinkler installer whose business is up north and go no help.

Long story short, they expected us to deal with it and offered no help. We never heard from the owner and eventually we contacted the county for help. A drone was sent out to verify the problem. They reported back that yes there was indeed a rupture but they couldn’t help because the owner needed to deal with it. We had to turn off the sprinklers that were leaking and then their gardener turned them back on.

Eventually it was fixed. It only took about 2 months. (Mind you this is when water was being rationed). The

2 orthodontist building has not been well cared for either. The lettering on the signs are coming down, the building itself is in need of paint - rust is visible, there was a cracked window that faced the street for several months. Landscape is mediocre at best.

The most problematic issues are the weeds/trash and mosquito problem. I’ve enclosed some photos of the field/yard that butts up to our yard and our neighbors yard. Mind you, their fence is wood and would more than likely, burn fast if it were to catch fire. We’ve had to contact weed abatement and the owner waits until the very last day before he’s fined to take care of the issue. But the truth is he doesn’t take care of the issue - he does piece meal fixes. He mows down the weeds on Peach across from the school.

You know the stuff you can see. The renter of the home on the property mows his front “lawn” but not the rest of the yard that extends toward us. You’ll see what we’re mentioning in the photos. There is also a water valve (which is also in the photos) that leaks and so weeds continue to grow. Water pools which, you guessed it, grows mosquitoes. (Not sure this is owner’s problem or city problem to fix).

The renters of the home on the property are relatives of the orthodontist and are nice neighbors. They’ve had problems with school children and some adults, trying to take a shortcut through their front yard to Kenosha. This might be the reason why they’ve not cleared the area (to discourage them - since it’s a dangerous mess to traverse). There’s also a broken down chainlink fence that they erected (it was not properly installed - just propped up) and fell within a few weeks. So, what remains is a true mess. The weeds grow out on to Kenosha in front of our home. We’ve tried to clean it up but it’s a huge job. It would take tools we don’t have.

It is now June 3rd, the deadline passed to clean up the weeds. Yesterday the large field was disced but not the mess near us. The owner hasn’t been a good neighbor or corporate citizen and is now offering his 2 acres across from Garfield Elementary as property to develop into R3 or R4. His previous attempts to develop the land was met with stiff opposition by us, the homeowners. We are an established neighborhood. We deserve to be able to continue with the same and we need your help.

3

4

5

6

7

8

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2026 3:24 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Claudia Aghoian
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = El Paso Ave., Clovis, CA 93611
textarea-1755209560293 = I am very concerned about the impact of this dense and low income housing on our schools that are already at capacity within the tight city limits. I value the high caliber public education Clovis offers and do not want to see that diluted due to overcrowding. In addition, I am concerned about the impact on traffic and pollution to our community. Since I am a home owner directly affected by this proposal, I am concerned about the type of housing, number of residences in the proposed housing and how this will affect my property value. I would appreciate further information about the use of these proposed parcels. I plan to attend the meeting June 23, 2026.

Client IP = 146.75.136.138

1 McKencie Perez
From: Suzan Blair < >
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2026 5:45 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: City Infill Rezone Program DeWolf and Owen’s Mt Rd I strongly oppose this project. The traffic is already heavy at peak times on Owen’s Mt. We purchased this property due to its peacefulness and quiet neighborhood. We have been here just over seven years, and were told no high density housing/apartments would be built. The lack of crosswalks already puts children at risk. Is a new school going to be built? I can’t imagine Bud Rank being able to accommodate the children in the high density housing. I am unable to attend June 23, but strongly voice my opposition.

Suzan. Blair
Trenton Avenue
Clovis CA 93619
Suzan

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2026 6:49 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Scott Beckman
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = N Graybark Ave
textarea-1755209560293 = High density housing where there are no services for them. Not a bright idea.

Small business and coffee shops a must. Would serve people enabling goals for master plan living. What ever happened to those goals???
Client IP = 108.71.99.67

1 McKencie Perez
From: Susan Colby < >
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2026 8:27 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Parcel 108
Hello,
We are very opposed to the Infill Rezone Program in parcel 108. It is a small “L” shaped parcel of land, surrounded by banks, dental office and other professional buildings. Behind this property are homes in a very quiet establishment neighborhood with most residents being senior citizens. This parcel would need access on Clovis Ave, which is already over congested. Furthermore, across Clovis Ave you have approved 3 car dealerships, restaurants, etc which has already started building.

One cannot even image the traffic issues that will be caused with that. Already people cut through the quiet neighborhood to avoid the lights and traffic on Clovis Ave.

Please DO NOT APPROVE this parcel of land for this project.

Thank you,
Susan Colby
N Hughes
Clovis, CA

1 McKencie Perez
From: Rob < >
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2026 2:36 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Property Owner informational Meeting Regarding The City's Infill Rezone Program Good afternoon McKencie Perez, MPA, Deputy City Planner, I'm not sure if I'll be able to make the meeting due to some health care concerns, but have a few questions and comments to pass on, if that is acceptable.

1. If I understand the Martinez v. City of Clovis court judgement correctly, the plaintiff is directing the City of Clovis to offer more "low-cost" housing to residents of the Central Valley, or those that may want to move here. The judgement directs the City of Clovis to conduct a search to contract with builders such as Wilson Homes to develop such housing to the tune of 1284 units. Rezoning to higher density means that there will be more units per zone at a lower cost to potential buyers. Is that about the long and the short of it? If so, what power do the current area owners have to interrupt that progress? Is this a meeting to satisfy a requirement? I'm interested in making sure I'm understanding the situation. Appreciate any feedback on that.

2. Being a retired military member and Veteran, I do have a few concerns, if this is the situation. • Most of the residents of this area have worked hard and had to save to purchase a more expensive house. Bringing in lower-income housing would negatively impact that proposition. • It appears that Wilson Homes and other builders are already breaking ground to build units.

Are these the Very High Density dwellings you speak about in your notice? If this is the case, what are the options to curtail this development.
• I sent a previous note as a precursor to the previous meeting on May 28, 2026, but I'd like to reiterate that there should be some traffic evaluation and preparation prior to any development of new housing, be it low-income or regular developments prior to the work starting. I was stationed in San Antonio when new developments both residential and commercial were built around Lackland Air Force Base. This caused a lot of gridlock and caused the city to conduct reactive road widening and building after the fact. As you can imagine, this caused grief and traffic backups.
• Another concern is that when you increase the population in areas and, with all due respect, include low-income or as you refer to as Very High Density housing, the crime rate will increase. This will put a stress on the Clovis Police and Sheriff's Departments. Are they or will they be ready to withstand additional work patrols and potentially more crime in the area. Many of residents have settled here to get away from the high crime rate in other areas in the Central Valley.

I'm sure other residents have concerns as well. For the above and other reasons, I respectfully request that this court order be reevaluated to take the current residents in the area into consideration. Thank you for your time. Take care.

Respectfully submitted,
Robert Rahal, MPA, LFACHE
Concerned Veteran

2 N. Whiteash Ave.

Clovis, CA
"For Leaders Who Care"

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2026 12:38 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Ingrid O’Neal
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = N De Wolf Avenue, Clovis, CA 93619 textarea-1755209560293 = Water availability is of the utmost concern with this proposed high-density rezone program. Any influx of users and consumers, whether they are on city water or on wells, will adversely impact the already depleted water table in this and surrounding areas.

Can the council please make an appeal to the administrators of the state housing requirements and of the court order, emphasizing the detrimental results of adding such a high-density population to the area? We are running out of water. Please, put an end to this.

Thank you.

Client IP = 146.75.136.66

1 McKencie Perez
From: Alma O'Neal < >
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2026 12:40 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Clovis Infill Rezone Program
Dear Ms. Perez,
Water availability is of the utmost concern with this proposed high-density rezone program. Any influx of users and consumers, whether they are on city water or on wells, will adversely impact the already depleted water table in this and surrounding areas.

Can the council please make an appeal to the administrators of the state housing requirements and of the court order, emphasizing the detrimental results of adding such a high-density population to the area? We are running out of water. Please, put an end to this.

Thank you.

Ingrid O’Neal

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2026 4:37 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Richard Clymore
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = W Muncie Ave
textarea-1755209560293 = Did the City of Clovis put forth any effort in fighting this Martinez vs City of Clovis court judgement, or did you just roll over. Your proposal to put a 72 unit across from the Buchanan Complex is ignorant at best. In addition, has a study been done to determine by how much that is going to decrease the price of our homes in the development behind the proposed development? We didn’t purchase our homes to be forced to have a low income development built next door. Also, traffic, which is already a problem in the morning and afternoon, is going to be much worse. I’m quite sure the neither the City Planner nor members of the City Council would appreciate the development placed in your neighborhood. Finally, since we are being forced into having this low-income apartment complex in our neighborhood, is the City of Clovis going to compensate us for the loss in value of our homes? Client IP = 67.174.54.214

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2026 7:04 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Erin Crowe
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = N Hughes Ave., Clovis, CA 93612
textarea-1755209560293 = Hello,
We are very opposed to the Infill Rezone Program in parcel 108. It is a small “L” shaped parcel of land, surrounded by banks, dental office and other professional buildings. Behind this property are homes in a very quiet establishment neighborhood with most residents being senior citizens. This parcel would need access on Clovis Ave, which is already over congested. Furthermore, across Clovis Ave you have approved 3 car dealerships, restaurants, etc which has already started building. One cannot even image the traffic issues that will be caused with that. Already people cut through the quiet neighborhood to avoid the lights and traffic on Clovis Ave.

Please DO NOT APPROVE this parcel of land for this project.

Thank you,
Client IP = 146.75.136.0

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2026 9:25 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Chris Kalashian
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = W Vermont Ave
textarea-1755209560293 = This is concerning the parcel across the street from Garfield on Peach Avenue. I am asking for the city to reconsider this parcel as part of the rezone project. As the city has grown north, Peach Avenue has become much busier. More and more people are using it from Shepherd as opposed to using Minnewawa or Willow. When school is in session, this only amplifies the traffic.

Must the city now add hundreds of people to this corner who will cause even more traffic and crowd an every growing area? Aren't there better places for this? Why add more people next to a school where cars are already an issue during the commuting hours and children are walking, biking, etc? In looking at the other parcels on this map, I don't see the surrounding area being impacted as much by the addition of hundreds of people and who knows how many additional vehicles. In addition to this, Fresno has changed the entire everyday life in this area by adding enormous apartment complexes all along Willow.

This little area has disproportionately been impacted by the addition of many, many, multi unit developments in recent years and the impact on driving, parking, crowding, etc cannot be overstated.

Will the city please reconsider adding another massive amount if people to an area that has already been impacted so greatly in recent years?
Client IP = 50.168.40.111

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2026 3:01 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Tammy Vestal
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = Oak Creek Road
textarea-1755209560293 = My property is 235 W Rialto and is adjacent to lot 110. I was wondering if I could get my lot rezoned? If at all possible? Any information would be appreciated. Thank You Client IP = 140.248.20.66

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2026 7:54 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Kayleigh Moranda
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = N. Graybark Ave.
textarea-1755209560293 = Hello,
As a homeowner in the area I have deep concerns regarding this project. I have written into the city of Columbus many times regarding how fast people are driving down Quincy Avenue. It is a huge hazard two children inside a neighborhood when people are driving 35+ miles an hour in a neighborhood street because they are using it as a cut off because the city does not have any streets that are more accessible to get from Dewolf to Locan closer to the 168. The traffic down, Quincy remains dangerous and has not changed since many of my writings. Putting even more people in a complex right there would make traffic even worse unless the city does something about the roads. Also, there is nothing accessible out here, so it would be difficult for people who are living in these apartments or in a low income area to access shopping, food, jobs, especially if they are lacking transportation, being all the way out here. This location does a disservice to them if they lack transportation. My largest concern however is the danger on Quincy and this project will just make this far worse.

Client IP = 108.71.98.181

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2026 7:56 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Kayleigh Moranda
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = N. Graybark Ave.
textarea-1755209560293 = I forgot to mention in my prior submission that Dewolf is not set up for this type of traffic considering it is one lane each way as is Owens Mountain Parkway. This project would require significant road work and if not done, would cause major traffic issues on these roads as they are already plugged in the morning without more homes/apartments.

Client IP = 108.71.98.181

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 12:50 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = David Rete
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = E Alluvial Ave
textarea-1755209560293 = Not in favor of proposed sites. Water issues, crime issues and traffic issues are my concerns.

Client IP = 74.253.6.64

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 1:00 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Shirley Peracchi
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = Tollhouse Rd. Clovis. Ca. 93719
textarea-1755209560293 = I oppose the building of low income housing and apartments. This will cause more congestion, noise and crime. What will happen to our wells. There is not enough water for all that building. This is country!
Client IP = 12.75.225.47

From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2026 6:13 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Ross Miller
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = Sunnyside Ave
textarea-1755209560293 = I'm concerned with a few elements of this plan:

1. What efforts were taken to ensure that the infill projects do not create an inequitable burden on low/lower income neighborhoods?

2. Will traffic studies be conducted for sites prior to development?

3. What will be done to ensure that noise and construction do not cause significant impacts to neighbors? The City recently repaved Sunnyside in the vicinity of three of the parcels that are being rezoned, which included vibrating drum rollers operating attachment to many houses between midnight and 5 AM
Client IP = 174.227.178.170

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2026 5:44 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Tyler Stjerne
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = N MAINE AVENUE
textarea-1755209560293 = City Council & Planning Members Constituents, I respectfully do not support the 2026 infill project that would get us "The City of Clovis" in compliance with the court judgement of Martinez v. City of Clovis. *A yes vote does more than kick the can down the road appeasing a court mandate.

My wife, son & I moved to our Harlan Creek neighborhood for the "Clovis way of Life" and enjoy the opportunity to live in a quiet low density neighborhood almost four years ago.

My now 6 year old loves to ride his bike and we happily go to our neighborhood park "always using the crosswalk" as much as possible. He is the highest priority for my wife and I.

I'm concerned for his safety as well as all of all our neighborhood kids, runners & walkers as the infill project brings potentially hundreds of additional cars daily through our 25mph neighborhood streets when they weren't designed for that capacity. We already experience excessive speeding as surrounding master planned communities use the streets of Quincy, Richmond & Salem as cut throughs to get from DeWolf to Locan or the inverse. It was eleven years ago my wife and I lost our first born son who is buried at the Academy Cemetery nearby and his loss amplifies the fear of loosing another child or neighbor.

Again specifically speaking to site #197 within my "Very Low Density Residential" neighborhood rezoning would bring additional traffic through our residential 25mph street that includes a crosswalk midway for a pedestrian parkway path said street narrows to 24' from curb-to-curb. Prior to my family moving in some neighborhood advocates have been trying to ask the city to either reduce the speed limit, put in speed bumps or patrol the area to avoid a car vs pedestrian fatality. I don't believe a 24' width residential two way street is to code in a neighborhood. Referencing city code 9.66.090 Circulation standards I see 26' as the minimum. If aware of this specific concern and or issue & you pass this rezoning allowing more residential development resulting to higher traffic through this choke-point and some is seriously hurt or killed it would be lifechanging for everyone involved.

Other parcel sites that are proposed for this infill rezoning have similar traffic concerns as our current planning and development was designed many years ago for the existing zoning. Site #157 could additionally bring near two times the traffic through our streets on top of the hundreds from #197. This safety concern is my primary objection. Please vote no or at least help us slow the speeding cars down that blaze through our neighborhood.

Tyler Stjerne
Client IP = 12.7.53.218

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2026 6:26 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Crystal
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = Soledad Ave
textarea-1755209560293 = Zone 115 poses future traffic issues and disturbance in an otherwise quiet neighborhood. The placement of multi-family units in that space, even if planned to regulation standards it’s not the ideal place for multi family units. Zone 590 is the better option of the 2. Please reconsider the fact that Leonard is narrow, and is not able to accommodate the influx of traffic. As well as, the fact of inconvenience as a renter. I myself would prefer to live somewhere less compact and easier to get in and out of having to drive to work or the store everyday.

Client IP = 104.56.39.181

1 McKencie Perez
From: Jason Horg < >
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2026 7:27 PM
To: Vong Mouanoutoua; Diane Pearce; Lynne Ashbeck; Matt Basgall; Drew Bessinger Cc: McKencie Perez
Subject: Infill Rezone Program and July 6th Public Hearing Dear Mayor, Clovis City Council, and Deputy City Planner, I hope this email finds you all doing well. I have been meaning to reach out the past several weeks, but like many in the area we live in, I am a busy professional and parent. I wished to take more time with this, but hopefully it will cover the pertinent issues. This email is in regards to the Infill Rezone Program and specifically the lots chosen by Harlan Ranch and Dry Creek area. We own a home within 800 feet of the property being proposed for the project so we were notified, and have attended a few of the Clovis Planning Department meetings, where I spoke at one.

The first issue I would like to point out is the recent Clovis Unified Boundary fight we went through just a year or two ago. Our neighborhood, Wilson Windsor, which is by the Diamond Crest community encompassing the area between 168 and Teague, and De Wolf and Locan. We were in the middle of that battle and in the end we were able to show good reason why our area is already highly impacted, look at Dry Creek Elementary enrollment alone, and the high traffic and congestion issues already present. I will admit, I was skeptical that Clovis Unified was truly looking for parent feedback and suggestions in the process and meetings, and would actually use our feedback. I suggested a plan using the data, and the fact that Clovis Unified is going through the same aging in place issues NW Fresno went through years ago, meaning the children move on after school, but the parents stay, so no new children to feed into the school. This is now happening at Clovis High, Clovis West and Buchanan. My suggestion was to fill those elementary schools with declining enrollments, such as Garfield, by bumping the lines down a few streets for everyone to balance out the numbers. Much better than having to build new schools. Norm Anderson actually reached out and let me know mine, along with a few other similar plans, were actually used in the final draft. I was shocked and impressed that they held to their word and truly were listening to us.

Our area is isolated, with the only nearby basic few restaurants and the only gas station, which is small and very high priced, is on Temperance. There is also no road that runs East to West from our area except for Shepherd, which is only one lane heading in the western direction. Otherwise you have to use Nees, but to get to Nees you have to go through one of our neighborhoods. We already have a ridiculous amount of traffic through our neighborhoods on small residential and country single lane roads now, can't imagine an increase. Clovis Unified had this studied and agreed with the traffic flowing through the neighborhood being an issue. Again, if this was all true then, only a year or two ago, it is absolutely still true now. I don't see how this was ignored or not communicated in light of the lots chosen for the infill.

If our neighbor, Susan Thompson, who spoke also at one of the meetings, was at all accurate with her figures, then that would mean 250-350ish of the 1300 new residents would be filled into our tiny area. This seems to be an onerous and unfairly heavy burden to be placed on any one location, especially one as isolated and unconducive as ours. That would mean 20-25% would be in our two proposed lots!!! De Wolf in that area is a tiny one lane each direction road with a median, and a three way stop on the corner. I wanted to include pictures to show you how tight and dangerous that stretch

2 already is. Also, if you look at the entire stretch of Harlan Ranch in its southern area, they are mostly high density housing already. These are the small lot homes stacked next to the proposed lots. I would say we already have quite a bit of high density housing in our area as it is. Also, going back to the boundary fight, if they saw how impacted the schools were then, how in the world could they place another 300 families in this area. Let's say that is an average of one child per household, which is low by national standards, that would be 300 new students!! Let's say it is half that, 150 new students!! Our children were almost forced to move to new schools and we own homes here, but they want to cause a major injection of new students?
I think the most troubling thing is how the planning division has conducted itself so far. What we witnessed at that meeting was the opposite of what we experienced with Clovis Unified. They told us at that meeting that when given the mandate to identify and study these lots, that they did not look for any contingency or alternatives in case one of them did not work. That is either lazy or very intentional, making sure they could force it upon us, which is exactly what happened during the vote that night. I could only imagine if I was tasked with something and provided no contingency or alternative spaces. In business, you get fired or sued for such behavior. They work for us taxpayers, and I would imagine would have to abide by some kind of prudent man or fiduciary capacity. After letting us speak, only one planning division member dissented on the vote to change the zoning. He was very disturbed by what he had heard from all of us as Clovis residents, but the rest of them just rammed through the vote, changing the only lots in our area zoned for commercial or retail, leaving us no chance of having any much needed services in our area. I was disgusted by what I saw that night.

A much more suitable location would be in new construction like over by Clovis Ave and Shepherd, by Willow, or in all of the vast growth area in SE Clovis. Our area is so isolated that ather would be now services or transportation available out here either. I think the planning division, and the council, need to remember that we are the taxpayers that make all of this possible, and we have rights as well, and I am hoping that the city will fight for us just as hard.. Hearing that attorney that won the case against Clovis in her news clips is so blatantly racist, "these are areas that are upper middle class, and mostly white". I have never been so offended, what are other races that aren't white not capable of being upper middle class. I think it is time for people to stand and be counted. If this city starts to fold now to pressure or groups, I can tell you first hand from what I have heard from so many friends and neighbors, they will not just move, but leave the state. Once all of those heavy taxpayers leave, then Clovis will start to feel it.

One alternative idea for the space, if it has to be high density, would be a retirement home. This area is quiet, and I don't know of any in the area. It would keep the traffic down, and not add to the issue with school capacity by adding more students. Also, there is a freeway right there with access to Clovis Community right down the road, and the others easily accessible with 168. Plus plenty of doctors and medical groups nearby. You wouldn't have to worry about a grocery store or similar services or stores being nearby, since most of those provide food in house. I think that would be a much smarter fit. Just a thought.

I will be on vacation like most people for the July 6th meeting. I cannot say I agree with that being the date chosen given it is the Monday after the 4th of July weekend, meaning many people will most likely be unable to attend. I hate to be cynical, but it seems intentional to me.

I know this is a very long email, but a very important and informational one as well, so I hope you can find the time to read it in its entirety. Thank you so much for what you do, and your time and attention to this matter.

3 Sincerely,
Jason Horg

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2026 8:38 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Terry Maldonado
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = N. Bush Ave
textarea-1755209560293 = I could not find specific information on the details regarding R-3 zoning.

Assuming it’s apartments but how many and how many stories is proposed? I’m also assuming the decisions have been made and they are final?
Client IP = 73.151.54.177

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2026 3:35 PM
To: Aaron La Mattina
Cc: McKencie Perez
Subject: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC COMMENT
Attachments: New Development at 270 W Herndon.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
date-1745483708617 = 2026-07-06
text-1745483711071 = (GPA)2024-003
text-1745483712599 = keith avera
text-1745483713055 =
textarea-1745483714111 = Attached is my letter and pictures of concerns regarding the development at 270 W Herndon
Client IP = 73.151.52.253

Keith Avera
June 30,2026
To: Planning Commission
Council Members
Planning Department
RE: APN: 491-020-42
Address: 270 W Herndon
I am writing concerning the development of the above property. Unfortunately, the hearing is on the day after July 4, 2026, holiday and I will not be able to attend. I have two concerns as a resident in the neighborhood adjacent to this property. We currently are experiencing the eTects of the city planning decisions and as of now my neighbors and I have been essentially told that we must live with the use of our residential streets as parking for adjacent business. My concern is that the development of multiple housing units on this parcel will increase the parking in our neighborhood, especially on weekends when friends/family come to visit the tenants/owners in the housing units. This will only exacerbate the current issues to our residential community and aTect our home values in the long run unless some remediation can be done. Currently our issues with the adjacent businesses are as follows:

1. The grade diTerential and the impact that the lighting will have on our neighborhood.

This property is currently being graded at 3 to 3.5 feet above our adjacent properties.

This is evidenced by the additional 150 vehicle sale spaces that were added to the business at Nissan of clovis.

2. Parking: Nissan of Clovis added parking spaces for their car sales and not for employee parking and ever since their employees have been parking up and down our streets and using our residential neighborhood to ferry their inventory through them. The employee parking that Nissan of Clovis is using in our residential neighborhoods is primarily on Peach, Magill and N Bush St. The day care center at 290 N Villa, Clovis CA 93612 uses W Fremont for business parking. The employees park all the way to the end of the corners at the access points of Fremont/Villa and Magill/Peach. This type of parking blocks the view to safely exit onto Villa and Peach for our residents.

My hope is that you will consider my points and believe that with extra thought the issues of grade diTerentials, light impacts to our neighborhood and the additional impacts of parking can be addressed to make our community safe and avoid issues later. If you have any further questions, please contact me.

Sincerely,
Keith Avera

Nissan of Clovis employee parking on Bush Nissan of Clovis employee parking on Magill Nissan of Clovis added sales parking
Grade differential of 270 West Herndon
and back fences of residential Magill.

Nissan of Clovis employee parking on Peach

1 McKencie Perez
From:

Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2026 1:07 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Comments Regrading Infill Rezoning Program
Attachments: Clovis Infill Rezoning Program Comments - S. Gettman.docx Good Afternoon,
Please find attached written comments to be included for the July 6, 2026 Clovis City Council Meeting regarding the proposed Infill Rezone Program.

Thank you.

Steve Gettman

To: Clovis City Council Members
Clovis Planning and Development Services Department
From: Steve Gettman
Date: July 2, 2026
RE: Clovis Infill Rezone Program Parcels 157 and 197 in Harlan Ranch I’m reaching out due to my concern regarding the Infill Rezoning Program (Parcels 157 and 197) that the Planning Commission approved resolutions recommending the City Council approve the project on May 28, 2026.

While I understand the need for high density housing and affordable housing within the City of Clovis, I have also seen what makes them successful:
• Transparency from all parties involved in the decision-making/planning process including community members
• Doing the process together, not having the process done “to you” • Smaller developments that do not overload the infrastructure and drastically change existing communities
• Being proactive to concerns and not reacting after the fact Unfortunately, the city has failed in these areas:
• There has been a lack of transparency regarding the selection of parcels for the Infill Rezone Program. The 20 selected parcels were presented to the public on December 16, 2025. We were told at that time as well as on May 28, 2026 (when Planning Commission approved the parcels) that any changes to the selected parcels could not be made as it could result in litigation. In addition, all parcels had to be approved together and not individually. If one parcel was changed, the process of selection and approval would need to be completely redone.
• It feels like the Harlen Ranch Community is having it “done to them”. They were not involved in the selection process, there was little transparency, and it feels like the decision that the Planning Department/Commission made to move forward with the rezoning was already decided prior to any notifications or meetings (information given, showed parcels that were selected, told cannot make any changes).
• The proposal for Harlen Ranch feels disproportional/punitive. It has the area receiving approximately 25% of the High-Density Rezoning (up to 353 units). No other area is being impacted in this way. The magnitude of these 2 developments will adversely affect the Harlen Ranch Community and their quality of life.

I have worked extensively in communities with Affordable High-Density housing and have found the following to be true:
• When individuals live close together, there is more conflict. In the High-Density communities I have worked in, the police were somewhat active in those developments that had approximately 100 units. In developments that had 200+ units, the police were very active (a police substation was put in one of the developments due to continued conflict and crime).
• Parking becomes a major problem with many tenants having 2 or more cars combined with guests. Parking spills over into the surrounding areas which creates conflict in the community.
• Due to increased traffic in and out of the area, crime and vandalism increases in these communities.
• High Density Housing puts stress on an area’s infrastructure, especially areas where the infrastructure is already insufficient or doesn’t exist.

The following problems currently exist in the Dewolf Avenue/Owens Mountain Parkway area and have yet to be addressed for over 10 years due to inadequate infrastructure being provided in the area and I have little faith that these issues will be addressed in a timely manner if the rezoning is approved and development on these parcels begins.
• Currently the 168/Owens Mountain Intersection cannot handle the volume of traffic that is being moved from 168 to Owens Mountain Parkway. Owens Mountain Parkway “squeezes” to one lane which becomes a safety concern (I have been “pushed” into oncoming eastbound traffic by drivers trying to make last minute passes on the right side heading west. In addition, the traffic backs up at the intersection of Owens Mountain Parkway and Dewolf (3 way stop sign).
• Since Owens Mountain Parkway fails to connect to Temperance Avenue, Richmond, Salem, and Quincey Avenues have become main thoroughfares in connecting Temperance Avenue to Dewolf Avenue. This increased traffic volume and speeding through these residential areas has created safety concerns in the residential area. • The intersection of Nees Avenue and Locan Avenue (access roads used by many drivers) constantly floods during inclement weather (rain) for at least the last 10 years but has yet to be addressed by either the City of Clovis or Fresno County. This again continues to create unsafe conditions in the area. I have also heard no plans for Nees Avenue east of Locan Avenue.
• The infrastructure in the area does not support the area at this time and will worsen with the addition of 300+ housing units. Planning and construction for the Owen’s Mountain Parkway and appropriate freeway entrance and exit should have started over 10 years ago when developments to the west of Dewolf Avenue were proposed. The freeway development as well as Owen’s Mountain Parkway is dependent on land acquisition that has yet to be acquired as well as CalTrans approval (freeway and land owned south of Owen’s Mountain Parkway).
• If the proposed 2 parcels are Rezoned to High Density, it will multiply the already existing traffic and safety concerns in the Dewolf Avenue/Owens Mountain Parkway area. Not only

will traffic significantly increase due to increased population (up to 353 units multiplied by 2 to 3 vehicles) and their guests but since there will be no zoned commercial property (restaurants, gas, food, stores) in the area, the community is forced to either drive to acquire these services, or vehicles come into the community to provide these services (food deliveries, UPS, Fed Ex, Amazon, etc.).
• In addition, I have little faith that these issues will be addressed in a timely manner once the rezoning is approved and development on these parcels begins.

In closing, I am very disappointed in the lack of transparency regarding the rezoning of properties as infill in the City of Clovis. With approximately 25% of the High-Density Zoning being in the Harlan Ranch Community (both parcels across the street from each other) it feels disproportional to the rezoning being done in the rest of the City of Clovis.

Since the first meeting I attended in December, it felt that the meetings were compliance driven to inform residents of the Infill Rezoning and that it was already decided that they would be moving forward to recommend approval of all 20 parcels without regard to the affected community concerns.

I am not opposed to one of the parcels being rezoned (preferably the corner east of Dewolf Avenue since we would still be able to retain commercial property to the west of Dewolf Avenue).

It was quite evident from the Planning Department that the decision to move forward with the 20 parcels had already been decided prior to any meetings being held. The individuals that bought property and live in the area were under the impression from developers and the Harlan Ranch Master Plan that there would be planned commercial on the northeast corner of Owens Mountain Parkway and Dewolf Avenues that would provide services to the area. If 157 and 197 are approved, all commercial zoning in the Harlan Ranch Master Plan will be gone and be replaced with more people, more congestion, and no commercial services for the community.

Thank you.

1 McKencie Perez
From: Jeff Arkelian < >
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2026 10:22 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Re: Fwd: Infill Rezone Program

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Thursday, July 2, 2026, 8:51 PM, Jeff Arkelian < > wrote:

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Thursday, July 2, 2026, 8:47 PM, Lynn Arkelian < > wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Jeff Arkelian < >
Date: Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 8:44 PM
Subject: Infill Rezone Program
To: < >
Sent from my iPhone
Dear McKencie Perez,
My name is Jeff Arkelian and I reside in the neighborhood that is adjacent to Parcel # 72. I've lived @ 526 W. Enterprise Ave with my family for the past 30 years. We were the first home owners to move into our development and it's been a great experience for all these years! But we are very concerned about the City of Clovis's Infill Rezone Program. Obviously, we would prefer houses or condos to be built on this parcel of land!!
Anyway, about 2 years ago, the owner of Parcel #72, John Bayrakdarian, DDS, the owner of a chain of Unique Orthodontic offices, held a meeting at his office at Peach & Nees. He had his Architect Ron Marlette inform myself and the folks from our neighborhood that Bayrakdarian intended to develop his property and have 3/4 story Apartments placed throughout his development. Needless to say, nobody at the meeting was pleased to hear

2 this.

He stated that there would be 2 driveways placed right across the street from Garfield Elementary School for access on the East side of the Apartments. I assumed at the time that Kenosha Ave. would be opened up for access on the West side of the development. Kenosha Ave runs into Sylmar Ave., which T's into Nees Ave., our southern access into our neighborhood.

This access from Nees on Sylmar has already been impacted by the Valley Cresent School's rush hour traffic in the AM. Cars come into our neighborhood on Sylmar and make a U-turn on Sylmar in our neighborhood around a center island. The cars then sit in the bike lane on Nees to access the 1 driveway into the school. I'm not sure if the school is still pushing to increase their enrollment from 171 students a to 415? What a bigger mess that will become!!! And how about all the traffic steaming out onto Peach right across from Garfield from the 2 proposed apartment driveways in the AM traffic crush. And then add the Alta Sierra & Buchanan traffic into the mix and we have a big mess for everyone in the area. This is very poor planning by the City of Clovis. You all need to do better for our neighborhood and the students at the Buchanan Educational Complex.

So, I'm not surprised that the City of Clovis has pretty much given the green light to the owners of these properties involved in this poorly conceived program. I was born and raised in Fresno and I was in the area and do remember that in the mid 90's there was a big corruption scandal called Operation Rezone. It sure seems like the the DEVELOPERS are again calling the shots, this time with the City of Clovis with their undo influence. It's obvious that the City of Clovis could've required the developers in the Loma Vista and Heritage Grove developments to place low income apartments in the vicinity of their projects!!
It's understood that DEVELOPERS make most of their money on single family homes. The financial structure of Clovis has long been based on developer fees( until
Measure Y) and the City of Clovis desired to keep them happy by not requiring them to help solve our low income housing issues and gave them a free pass ? So, this is where the Infill Rezone Program comes in by having big, ugly 3/4 story apartments jammed down our collective throats. Ms. Perez, I'm sure you wouldn't want this type of development in your backyard! I can see placing 2 story apartments, but this whole program STINKS the way it's laid out. Put yourself in our shoes. The City of Clovis needs to show the Clovis residents in these Infill Rezone areas some love and compassion, there has to be a better solution.

I sure wish the City of Clovis would have continued developing low income housing like the way they did on the Northeast corner of Willow and Alluvial.

The address is 725 W. Alluvial. It's a 4 acre parcel that only has 1/2 story units throughout the apartment complex. The complex is called Solivita Commons. It's tucked in between the ARCO on the West, a Derrel's Mini Storage on the North, and a Senior Living complex on the East. My youngest daughter lived there for about 1 year after it opened in 2021. There are 60

3 units in this clean, safe, nice looking gym complex. So, this turned out to be an ideal spot for low income housing. This complex was conceived with thoughtful planning , unlike what's transpiring throughout the Infill Rezone Program.

In conclusion, the City of Clovis got the State of California off their backs and managed to keep the DEVELOPERS super happy and unaffected. You know, you stated that you initially had earmarked 24 units for this program and then lowered it to 20. Why not go for 28 or 30 parcels to keep the apartments to 2 stories? Why jam 3/4 story, ugly apartments in these parcels and compromise nicely planned single family neighborhoods. I understand that there needs to be a workable plan, so, why not seek the middle ground and compromise with ONLY 1/2 story apartments? It sure seems like you're following the path of least resistance with this Infill Rezone Program, you all need to up your game!!! You're creating a lot of animosity amongst amongst a good number of long term residents of Clovis who deserve better. You know the saying, Clovis, it's a way of life. I'm thinking sadly, that mindset is long gone!!!!
Sincerely, Jeff Arkelian

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 11:14 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Rhianna Beaumont-Lamb
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = V
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
As a homeowner in the Harlan Ranch/Owens Mountain area, I am writing to express serious concerns regarding the proposed rezoning at Owens Mountain and De Wolf Avenues from "live-work/commercial" to high-density affordable housing.

Many residents purchased homes here based on promises of walkable, nearby shopping—a plan changed without prior notification to homeowners. While we understand the need for affordable housing, this specific location cannot support the infrastructure strain:

Bud Rank Elementary is already at capacity. High-density family housing will severely overcrowd our local schools.

Additionally, roads in this area are already heavily congested; a large influx of multi-family units will worsen gridlock and safety.

We respectfully request that this parcel be zoned exclusively for Affordable Senior Housing. This compromise allows Clovis to meet its housing mandates while completely protecting Bud Rank Elementary from overcrowding and significantly reducing potential traffic congestion.

Please protect our neighborhood's infrastructure and support senior housing for this site.

Client IP = 50.201.240.100

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 3:32 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Michael
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 = Harlan Ranch
textarea-1755209560293 = I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed rezoning for additional affordable housing near the Owens Mountain area.

I understand the need for affordable housing, but I do not believe this location is the right place for additional high-density development. This area is already experiencing significant growth, and I am concerned that adding more housing will overwhelm the existing infrastructure.

Our local schools are already facing increasing enrollment, and additional housing could further overcrowd them. There are also very few shopping centers, grocery stores, restaurants, and other everyday services in this part of Clovis.

Traffic is another major concern. This is one of the last residential developments before the foothills, and there are very few roads available to handle the increased traffic that hundreds of additional homes would generate. Roads such as Owens Mountain Parkway, De Wolf Avenue, Shepherd Avenue, and Highway 168 are already heavily traveled during peak hours. Without significant roadway improvements, I believe this development will create congestion and safety concerns for residents.

I respectfully ask the City to carefully evaluate whether the infrastructure—including roads, schools, emergency services, and commercial development—is sufficient before approving additional housing in this area. I hope the City will consider the long-term impact on the existing community and ensure that growth is balanced with the services and infrastructure needed to support it.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my comments.

Client IP = 99.20.222.154

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 3:33 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Kris and Aida Kachadoorian
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = As a homeowner in the Harlan Ranch/ Owens Mountain area, I am writing to express serious concerns regarding the proposed rezoning at Owens Mountain and De Wolf Avenues from "live-work/ commercial" to high-density affordable housing.

Many residents purchased homes here based on promises of walkable, nearby shopping—a plan changed without prior notification to homeowners. While we understand the need for affordable housing, this specific location cannot support the infrastructure strain:

Bud Rank Elementary is already at capacity. High-density family housing will severely overcrowd our local schools.

Additionally, roads in this area are already heavily congested; a large influx of multi-family units will worsen gridlock and safety.

We respectfully request that this parcel be zoned exclusively for Affordable Senior Housing. This compromise allows Clovis to meet its housing mandates while completely protecting Bud Rank Elementary from overcrowding and significantly reducing potential traffic congestion.

Please protect our neighborhood's infrastructure and support senior housing for this site.

Client IP = 170.232.227.254

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 3:42 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Adan Bautista
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = I just want express my disapproval and opposition to this project in the Harlan Ranch area.

Client IP = 104.36.176.198

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 3:48 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Kevin Sciutto
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = To rezone the Harlan Ranch area would unjustly impact our communities and home values. We moved further away from the city have less density, not higher.

Client IP = 74.253.6.110

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 3:51 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Hyung Tae Kim
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = I am writing as a homeowner in the Harlan Ranch/Owens Mountain neighborhood to raise serious concerns about the proposed rezoning of the parcel at Owens Mountain and De Wolf Avenues from live-work/commercial to high-density affordable housing.

Many of us purchased homes here based on the original plan for walkable, nearby commercial space — a change that was made without any prior notification to residents. We understand and support the City's need to meet its affordable housing mandates, but we believe this particular site is not well-suited to high-density family housing, for two key reasons:

School capacity. Bud Rank Elementary is already operating at capacity. Adding high-density family housing to this parcel would significantly overcrowd the school and strain educational resources for the entire neighborhood.

Traffic and safety. The roads surrounding this parcel are already heavily congested. A large influx of multi-family units would worsen gridlock and create additional safety risks for pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers alike.

As a constructive alternative, we respectfully request that this parcel be zoned exclusively for affordable senior housing. This approach would allow the City to make meaningful progress toward its housing goals while avoiding the strain on Bud Rank Elementary and minimizing the added traffic burden on our streets.

Client IP = 172.59.51.227

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 4:13 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Samantha Keen
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = I have been a resident in clovis for 10 yrs. I moved herw from orange county to harlan ranch because it made me feel safe being a single mother. I also was very impressed by the school district. However now I am concerned about crime increasing in the area and our schools being overwhelmed by more children. Therefore I am asking the city to please only use this zoned area for low income senior housing
Client IP = 143.105.117.90

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 4:21 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Carolyn Mendonca
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = As a homeowner in the Harlan Ranch/Owens Mountain area, I am writing to express serious concerns regarding the proposed rezoning at Owens Mountain and De Wolf Avenues from "live-work/commercial" to high-density affordable housing.

Many residents purchased homes here based on promises of walkable, nearby shopping—a plan changed without prior notification to homeowners. While we understand the need for affordable housing, this specific location cannot support the infrastructure strain:

Bud Rank Elementary is already at capacity. High-density family housing will severely overcrowd our local schools.

Additionally, roads in this area are already heavily congested; a large influx of multi-family units will worsen gridlock and safety.

We respectfully request that this parcel be zoned exclusively for Affordable Senior Housing. This compromise allows Clovis to meet its housing mandates while completely protecting Bud Rank Elementary from overcrowding and significantly reducing potential traffic congestion.

Please protect our neighborhood's infrastructure and support senior housing for this site.

Client IP = 104.56.37.53

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 6:04 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Amanda Tejeda
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = As a resident in the Harlan Ranch/Owens Mountain area, I am writing to express serious concerns regarding the proposed rezoning at Owens Mountain and De Wolf Avenues from "live-work/commercial" to high-density affordable housing.

Many residents purchased homes here based on promises of safe, walkable nearby shopping and an area that would maintain the value of our homes. A nefarious plan by those in Sacramento who have no idea of the infrastructure or congestion of our already schools and roads should not dictate what voters have already decided on.

Bud Rank Elementary is already at full capacity to include surrounding Elementary schools. Family housing will severely overcrowd our local schools and decrease our home value.

Additionally, roads in this area are already heavily congested; a large influx of multi-family units will worsen gridlock and safety. Harlan Ranch in particular.

I respectfully request that this parcel be zoned exclusively for Affordable Senior Housing. This compromise allows Clovis to meet its housing mandates while completely protecting Bud Rank Elementary from overcrowding and significantly reducing potential traffic congestion.

Please protect our neighborhood's infrastructure and support senior housing for this site.

Client IP = 98.255.24.50

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 8:06 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Amy bennett
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = As a homeowner in the Harlan Ranch/Owens Mountain area, I am writing to express serious concerns regarding the proposed rezoning at Owens Mountain and De Wolf Avenues from "live-work/commercial" to high-density affordable housing.

Many residents purchased homes here based on promises of walkable, nearby shopping—a plan changed without prior notification to homeowners. While we understand the need for affordable housing, this specific location cannot support the infrastructure strain:

Bud Rank Elementary is already at capacity. High-density family housing will severely overcrowd our local schools.

Additionally, roads in this area are already heavily congested; a large influx of multi-family units will worsen gridlock and safety.

We respectfully request that this parcel be zoned exclusively for Affordable Senior Housing. This compromise allows Clovis to meet its housing mandates while completely protecting Bud Rank Elementary from overcrowding and significantly reducing potential traffic congestion.

Please protect our neighborhood's infrastructure and support senior housing for this site.

Client IP = 73.66.49.85

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 9:01 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Pamela Paras, CMT, LMT, MLD-C
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 =
When my family and I moved cross country, we chose Harlan Ranch based on promises of walkable, nearby shopping (a plan changed without prior notification to homeowners) and to pursue a more quiet, safe environment for our family.

As a resident I am writing to express serious concerns regarding the proposed rezoning at Owens Mountain and De Wolf Avenues from "live-work/commercial" to high-density affordable housing.

While I understand the need for affordable housing, this specific location cannot support the infrastructure strain.

While my child is no longer in elementary school, I know that Bud Rank Elementary is already at capacity.

High-density family housing will severely overcrowd our local schools and bring more child foot traffic and school busses into an already bustling neighborhood. The roads in and around this area are already heavily congested; a large influx of multi-family units will worsen gridlock and safety both in and outside of Harlan Ranch.

My family and I respectfully request that this parcel be zoned exclusively for Affordable Senior Housing.

This compromise allows Clovis to meet its housing mandates while completely protecting Bud Rank Elementary from overcrowding and significantly reducing potential traffic congestion.

Please protect our neighborhood's infrastructure and support senior housing for this site.

Sincerely,
Pamela Paras, CMT, LMT, MLD-C
Client IP = 73.2.98.245

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2026 3:39 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Cheryl Rusconi
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = As a homeowner in the Harlan Ranch/Owens Mountain community, I would like to share my concerns about the proposal to rezone the property at Owens Mountain and De Wolf from live-work/commercial to high-density affordable housing.

When many of us chose to purchase our homes here, we did so with the expectation that the area would eventually include neighborhood shops and services within walking distance. Learning that this plan may change without input from nearby residents is concerning.

I fully support the need for affordable housing, but I don’t believe this location is the best fit for a highdensity family development. Bud Rank Elementary is already very busy, and adding a large number of family housing units could place even more pressure on the school. Traffic in this area has also increased significantly, and additional high-density housing would likely make congestion and safety concerns worse.

I encourage the City to consider affordable senior housing for this site instead. It would still help address the community’s housing needs while having a much smaller impact on our schools and local traffic.

Thank you for taking the time to consider the perspectives of the residents who live in and care deeply about this neighborhood.

Client IP = 198.0.227.89

City of Clovis
Re: Clovis Infill Rezone Program
Dear McKencie Perez,
My name is Marty Bohigian and I reside in a home that sits on a property adjacent to parcel #72 in the city of Clovis. I have lived at with my family for over 28 years. We were one of the first homeowners to move into our newly built home at the time and it has been a great experience for these past years. However, we are very concerned about the city of Clovis Infill Rezone Program. Obviously, we would prefer to see zoning for parcel #72 remain as is, so that single family homes be built like the rest of our neighborhood.

One of the biggest concerns I have with the addition of high density or very high density housing on parcel #72 is safety. There is currently a large amount of congestion of vehicles and students coming and going to school at the Buchanan Education Center; including Garfield elementary each weekday morning and afternoon. Access to a new high density apartment complex would require at least one or two driveways that would force additional traVic onto Peach Avenue directly across the street from Garfield.

I have many concerns keeping everyone safe in our community today with the congestion of vehicles, students (riding bicycles, e-bikes and scooters) and parents moving in and around Garfield.

In conclusion, I realize the city of Clovis is trying to comply with the state of California regarding the addition of aVordable housing. It just seems like you’re taking the path of least resistance with this Infill Rezone Program by using willing land owners to comply with the state mandate. I moved here from Fresno for the “Clovis Way of Life”, but sadly that will end for my family and our neighborhood if this parcel #72 rezone takes place and apartments are built.

Sincerely,
Marty Bohigian

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 2:32 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Charles Baley
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = Ask almost any Clovis resident if they want affordable high density housing in their neighborhood. The overwhelming answer will be no. We don't want to be like Fresno. That's why we choose to live in Clovis. Infill Rezone Program is a horrible idea being forced on the people who actually call Clovis their home by outsiders. It must be stopped before it too late.

Client IP = 67.181.14.214

1 McKencie Perez
From: Briana Parra
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2026 11:26 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Cc: Andrew Haussler; Renee Mathis
Subject: FW: City of Clovis Apartment rezone
Please see below Public Comment.

Thank you,
Briana Parra
City Clerk
Office: 559-324-2060
[email protected]
From: Kim Eidson < >
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2026 10:10 AM
To: Matt Basgall <[email protected]>; Lynne Ashbeck <[email protected]>; Diane Pearce <[email protected]>; Vong Mouanoutoua <[email protected]>; Drew Bessinger <[email protected]> Subject: City of Clovis Apartment rezone
Good morning!
I have been reading the article on the proposed rezones. What stood out to me and seems to be overlooked is the City offering to lower standards for these proposed properties with less parking and no greenspace required when the standards should be elevated to make these proposed complexes a part of the neighborhoods rather than a problem.

I live behind Coventry Cove Apartments and went through the same process years ago when that property was being rezoned to high density. The initial plans proposed by the builder were very different from what we were able to have changed to make the complex more a part of the neighborhood without detracting too much from our existing homes. The initial plans had parking directly behind our homes against the existing wooden fences, 2 story units right behind our homes looking into our backyards. We were able to get block walls, have parking moved to the front and one story units behind our homes. Green space, trees and greenery added to cut sound and give us a buffer.

My point is that with input from residents, the City can work to create a compromise similar to Coventry Cove. Do we still have issues - yes, we have police activity there quite often. Much of that could be mitigated with the addition of cameras which would weed out the problem tenants.

A city, resident commission would be very helpful with the process. Most homeowners worked hard to get where they are and they just want to enjoy their homes. Support from the city and planning commission to hold these projects to a standard that fits with the existing neighborhood would go a long way. Don't compromise on the projects at the expense of our beautiful city and neighborhoods. Anything proposed should fit within the Clovis Way of Life.

Kim Eidson

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2026 2:30 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = K L
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = I oppose building these low income in our neighborhood of Harlan ranch! They should've been proposed back when these builders built and advised homeowners that they would have low income housing in the development at that time. Then signed acknowledgement. That is not the case and I used to work in new home construction/sales and that was what was happening at that time (in another county). People knew what was going to be in the neighborhood. We do not want low income housing bringing our house values down and is not fair to us. We have been homeowners for a long time here in this neighborhood. Build these low income houses in some of your new build developments and let the new homeowners be advised of this upfront. We are not OK and oppose this every single one of us for the most part are going to agree! Stand up for our city & long term homeowners and citizens! We don't need our homes to lose value and they will over this nonsense!!!! Client IP = 108.227.94.93

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2026 2:42 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Ethan Eliason
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = I would like to know more information about the 2 rezone sites...157 and 197.

What density are those two sites going to be rezoned to? Client IP = 97.213.153.197

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2026 4:00 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Hilda Vandergriff
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = We have lived In Harlan Ranch community for over 17 years. I would not like to see lower income housing near our neighborhood. It will bring people into our community parks, our school traffic will be affected, the traffic for people going to work will also become a nightmare. We pay HOA dues to keep our community clean and safe.

Client IP = 76.20.65.15

1 McKencie Perez
From: Daniel Valluzzi < >
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2026 4:04 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Infill Rezone Program Question
Good afternoon,
In regards to the infill rezone near the Harlan Ranch community, could you please provide me with an example of the type of housing development that may be built? Thanks,
Daniel

1 McKencie Perez
From: Gregory Belemjian < >
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2026 6:28 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: In fill
My name is Greg Belemjian. My wife, Mary and I reside at .

We are very concerned about the in fill rezone taking place at several locations in Clovis including two large properties adjacent to Harlan Ranch. We’ve lived here since 2009 and love the community. Our children and Grandchildren live here as well.

Unfortunately, promises have been made to Harlan Ranch residents for the use of this land for years.

Shopping villages with integrated residential, promises of no high density apartments, etc.

Now we learn R1 zoning is being changed to R3 and R4 allowing multi story, high density apartments on this land.

My understanding is this radical change is the result of a court order as a result of a law suit accusing the city of Clovis of not providing adequate low income housing. This law suit I’m told originated and was directed by parties not residing in Clovis.

It appears all development requirements are being relaxed and EPA regulations are being waived.

Information regarding details of these projects are sparse at best and we’ve been told how this project is going forward. The city has no choice but to change the zoning and hand the project to developers.

We’re told the cities involvement ends and the developers have a free hand once the zoning is changed.

Where is leadership on the part of the city of Clovis.

Who in city government is going to stand up and say NO! This is nuts. Absolutely no consideration of this kind of development when our adjacent communities were developed.

No one’s opposed to high density communities, but building them on top of established single family communities makes no sense.

We have no water, schools, sewage, retail, transportation, or basic life support for this kind of retrofitted development.

These kinds of developments bring nothing positive to Clovis. Have we learned nothing from similar developments in Fresno.

This appears corrupt at its core.

We have more than adequate low income housing available in Clovis.

This zoning change will seriously impact the lives of the family’s who have invested their life’s work into their homes. For many, their homes are their primary financial assets. This development is doomed to failure. The lack of rationally planned infrastructure alone, before a shovel of dirt is turned should be a GIANT RED FLAG!!!!
Retrofit infrastructure always becomes an expensive ongoing nightmare.

Clovis is a way of life, one of the best places to live in this crumbling state. We’ve been able to maintain this quality of life while growing sensibly to allow more people to enjoy the quality of life we have provided for decades.

Please don’t roll over. Please stand tall and strong.

All of us are depending on you to preserve the unique quality of life we cherish.

Our children and Grandchildren are counting on you to do the right thing.

This zoning change and consequent development will irreparably damage the existing communities.

Quality of life is at stake.

Don’t let our “way of life”
slip away.

Please stand against this zoning change. Once passed, there’s no going back.

2 Thank you for your consideration.

Regards,
Greg Belemjian
Sent from my iPhone

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2026 6:35 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Michelle Ascue
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = NO for high density housing! It will destroy the property values and overburden the area roads with too many cars and the overwhelm the schools with too many new kids! Please rethink this!!! If you want to add Senior Housing that could be a viable option. I have heard from many homeowners (as a resident and local Realtor ) that have lived here for awhile, including myself, and NOBODY wants Hi Density housing in this Harlan Ranch region! Client IP = 45.25.87.226

1 McKencie Perez
From: Gregory Belemjian < >
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2026 8:25 AM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Rezone
Good morning,
I’d like to add one further thought.

I’ve always wondered how Kingsburg has managed to control its growth and quality of life.

Kingsburg is a Charter city.

I’m no expert, but the basic structure of a Charter city is local governance over local issues.

Can this be a possible solution to the rezone issue, as well as local governance going forward.

Has this already been considered?
Regards,
Greg Belemjian
Sent from my iPhone

1 McKencie Perez
From: Paul Armendariz
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2026 9:29 AM
To: Briana Parra; McKencie Perez
Subject: FW: density review for vacant property at Shaw and Locan Infill rezone public comment.

Paul
Paul Armendariz
Assistant City Manager
Office: 559-324-2060
[email protected]
From: Vong Mouanoutoua <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2026 10:27 PM
To: Paul Armendariz <[email protected]>; Andrew Haussler <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: density review for vacant property at Shaw and Locan FYI
Vong Mouanoutoua
Mayor
Office: 559-324-2010
[email protected]

From: Cyndy Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2026 1:50 PM
To: Vong Mouanoutoua <[email protected]>
Subject: density review for vacant property at Shaw and Locan

Good afternoon Mayor,
I apologize for sending an email rather than appearing in person at the City Council meeting tonight, but no one would want me sharing my flu germs. I hope this email will suffice.

I would like to address the proposed rezoning of the vacant property at Logan and Shaw. I have no doubt that this will ultimately be rezoned, but I would like the city council to carefully consider the traffic situation before making a final decision.

Locan is a two-lane roadway, with a turn lane in the center. During the summer, traffic is manageable. During the school year the area becomes heavily congested due to the close proximity of both Freedom Elementary School and Red Bank Elementary School.

2 I completely understand the need for affordable housing. However, I question whether this particular property is well suited for high density development. I respectfully ask the City Council to consider rezoning the property for medium or low density residential use.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Cyndy Thomas
"Some people wait a lifetime for a miracle, we raise them one at a time”

1 McKencie Perez
From: Ken Codeglia < >
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2026 1:36 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Just wanted to offer my opinion that the proposed housing project next door to Harlan Ranch is an inappropriate site. I am not against the project and for the need to build additional housing, and certainly to comply with the court order. But that particular site is not appropriate for low-income families due to the lack of proximity to shopping and transit. Also, if there are school-age children involved it may negatively impact Bud Rank Elementary school.

Ken Codeglia

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2026 4:30 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Leland Howard
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = RE: Parcel #72
I are concerned about the proposed development on parcel #72, behind Unique Orthodontics.

There are 2 primary concerns that the City of Clovis needs to consider:

1. Traffic Impact - Peach Ave and Nees Ave are already extremely busy and the addition of apartments with vehicles and 2 additional access points will create an impact to both traffic and the safety of the children (and adults) the attend Garfield Elementary as well as Alta Sierra Intermediate.

2. Neighborhood Safety – The additional of Very High Density Residential will (unfortunately) decrease the safety of existing residents of the City of Clovis as they will most certainly be additional crime.

Local infrastructure should be looking to serve the safety of the families in the homes already in the area.

Has there been a traffic impact study that specifically evaluates student safety during peak hours? Have the residents in our area and the neighborhood to the south participated in any type of questionnaire to delve into the impact of safety in our neighborhoods?
There was a reason this parcel was zoned as it was. I request that the city not rezone this parcel, as it is not in the best interest of the citizens of Clovis.

Client IP = 73.151.51.49

1 McKencie Perez
From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2026 5:41 PM
To: McKencie Perez
Subject: Planning Infill Rezone Program Form - contact us text-1755209425252 = Melissa Howard
text-1755209464120 =
text-1755209498255 =
textarea-1755209560293 = My name is Melissa Howard and my family and I have lived in the Buchanan Estates neighborhood just north of the corner of Peach & Nees for over 26 years.

As a long time residents of Clovis, my husband and I are concerned about the proposed development on parcel #72, behind Unique Orthodontics.

Over the years, we have watched our community grow in positive ways. However, we are becoming increasingly concerned about this proposed development at the expense of our neighborhood safety, and truly, The Clovis Way of Life.

Our primary concern regarding this project, is the massive increase in traffic directly across from Garfield Elementary School. This area is already heavily congested during morning drop off and afternoon pick up times. Having a high density complex in this parcel location will flood the streets with more vehicles, creating severe traffic problems, but most importantly, endangering children and their parents walking or biking to and from school, not to mention the residents who walk, bike, and run alone the sidewalk.

Local infrastructure should be looking to serve the safety of the families in the homes already in the area.

Has there been a traffic impact study that specifically evaluates student safety during peak hours? Have the residents in our area and the neighborhood to the south and south east participated in any type of questionnaire to delve into the impact of safety in our neighborhoods? There was a reason this parcel was zoned as it was. If that must change - we request the City Council make modifications in the best interest of the citizens in this neighborhood of Clovis.

Client IP = 73.151.51.49