Agenda packet — Colton City Council, January 4, 2022 (part 2 of 3)

 DIRECT COVID-19 EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND TO ADDRESS THE NEGATIVE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF COVID-19
The interim final rule specifies that funds deployed for ARPA’s first purpose — responding to public health needs and economic damage from the pandemic —must respond “to the disease itself or the harmful consequences of the economic disruptions resulting from or exacerbated by the COVID-19 public health emergency.”

On the public health front , a number of pandemic -related expenses qualify: COVID -19 prevention and mitigation, medical care (including mental health and substance abuse treatment), public health and safety staff, and relevant implementation expenses.

On the economic front, the Tre asury Department points to a number of eligible uses:
assistance to unemployed workers (including job training); deposits to replenish state unemployment insurance trust funds; administrative expenses to improve the efficacy of economic relief programs (e. g., through data system upgrades); direct aid to households; assistance to small businesses and nonprofits; rehiring government staff; and aid to impacted industries (specifically tourism, travel, and hospitality). Across these economic relief categories, governments must be able to demonstrate that the ultimate recipients of funds experienced economic harm from the pandemic (such as loss of earnings or revenue) and that the funds they distribute “respond to” that harm in ways that are “related and reasonably proportional.”

The rule provides even greater flexibilities for state and local spending in lower -income neighborhoods ( Qualified Census Tracts ), tribal government spending, and spending targeted to “other populations, households, or geographic areas d isproportionately impacted by the pandemic.” The City of Colton is situated in four identified Qualified Census Tracts and is situated in a geographic area disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. In the qualified census tracts , the public health and economic impacts of the pandemic often multiplied pre -existing “systemic public health and economic challenges that may have contributed to more severe impacts of the pandemic.”

The guidance points to a wider set of presumed eligible uses in these impacte d places, such as investing in affordable housing, homelessness prevention, and lead abatement; addressing disparities in educational resources for high -poverty schools and vulnerable students; and promoting healthy childhood environments through child car e, home visiting programs, and services for system -involved families and youth. These eligible uses are strongly focused on investments in human needs in impacted communities, rather than more traditional economic development (e.g., support for industry or physical upgrades).

 REVENUE REPLACEMENT
3 Packet Pg. 203
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds
January 4, 2022

Page 3 ends

Revenue replacement for the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue due to the COVID -19 public health emergency, relative to revenues collected in the most recent fiscal year prior to the emergency.

Many state, local, territorial, and Tribal governments have experienced significant budget shortfalls, which can yield a devastating impact on their respective communities. Faced with budget shortfalls and pandemic -related uncertainty, state and local governments cut staff in all 50 states. These budget shortfalls and staff cuts are particularly problematic at present, as these entities are on the front lines of battling the COVID -19 pandemic and helping citizens weather the economic downturn.

Recipients may use these funds to replace lost revenue. Treasury’s Interim Final Rule establishes a methodology that each recipient can use to calculate its reduction in revenue. Specifically, recipients will compute the extent of their reductio n in revenue by comparing their actual revenue to an alternative representing what could have been expected to occur in the absence of the pandemic. Analysis of this expected trend begins with the last full fiscal year prior to the public health emergency and projects forward at either (a) the recipient’s average annual revenue growth over the three full fiscal years prior to the public health emergency or (b) 4.1%, the national average state and local revenue growth rate from 2015-18 (the latest available data).

For administrative convenience, Treasury’s Interim Final Rule allows recipients to presume that any diminution in actual revenue relative to the expected trend is due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. Upon receiving Coronavirus State and Lo cal Fiscal Recovery Funds, recipients may immediately calculate the reduction in revenue that occurred in 2020 and deploy funds to address any shortfall. Recipients will have the opportunity to re-calculate revenue loss at several points through the progra m, supporting those entities that experience a lagged impact of the crisis on revenues.

Revenue loss is an expenditure category that gives the City broad latitude to use funds to provide government services with few restrictions. Depositing ARPA funds i n the City’s General Fund provides maximum flexibility on how the City ultimately uses funds to meet the needs of its residents and local businesses and without additional reporting requirements to the Department of the Treasury.

To calculate the loss of revenue, the City computed the extent of the reduction in revenues using the Department of Treasury calculation to compare actual revenue to a “counterfactual trend” (i.e., Counterfactual Revenue). This counterfactual trend represents the amount of revenu es the City could have been expected to generate in the absence of the pandemic. The counterfactual trend starts with the last full fiscal year prior to the COVID -19 public health emergency (FY 2018 -19) and then assumes growth at a constant rate in the su bsequent years. For purposes of measuring revenue growth in the counterfactual trend, ARPA recipients may use a growth adjustment of either 4.1 3 Packet Pg. 204
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds
January 4, 2022

Page 4 ends

percent per year or the recipient’s average annual revenue growth over the three full fiscal years (FY 2016 -17, FY 2017-18 and FY 2018 -19) prior to the COVID -19 public health emergency, whichever is higher. Following the four -step process to determine the reduction of general fund revenues outlined in the Interim Final Rule, it was initially determined the City’s a verage annual growth rate in the three years prior to the COVID - 19 pandemic was 14.49%, which is greater than the minimum base growth rate of 4.1% allowed in the Interim Final Rule.

The four-step process to determine the extent of a city’s reduction in revenue includes:

 Step 1: Identify general revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year prior to the pandemic, called the Base Year Revenue (i.e., FY 2018-19)  Step 2: Estimate “Counterfactual Revenue”
 Step 3: Identify Actual Revenue
 Step 4: T he extent of the Reduction in Revenue is equal to Counterfactual Revenue less Actual Revenue.

The formula provided by the Department of the Treasury for calculating a reduction in a recipient’s general revenue equals:

Where:
 Base Year Revenue is the recipient’s general revenue for the most recent full fiscal year prior to the COVID–19 public health emergency  Growth Adjustment is equal to the greater of 4.1 percent (or 0.041) and the recipient’s average annual revenue growth over the three full fisca l years prior to the COVID–19 public health emergency ( 14.49%, or 14.49% represents the City of Colton’s average annual revenue growth)
 n equals the number of months elapsed from the end of the base year to the calculation date
 Actual General Revenue is a recipient’s actual general revenue collected during 12-month period ending on each calculation date

Table 1 – City of Colton Revenue Loss
Growth Rate 0.1449
As of: 6/30/2019 12/31/2020 12/31/2021 12/31/2022 12/31/2023 n (Months elapsed) 18 30 42 54
Base year revenue 63,620,817
Counterfactual
revenue
77,940,841 89,236,348 102,169,096 116,976,004
3 Packet Pg. 205
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds
January 4, 2022

Page 5 ends

Actual Revenue
(last 12 months)
60,773,107
Extent Revenue
Loss
17,167,734

With the City of Colton’s average annual growth rate at 14.49 %, the Counterfactual Revenue (the amount of general revenues the City could have been expected to generate in the absence of the pandemic) ranges from $77,940,841 for the period ending December 31, 2020 to $116,976,004 for the period ending December 31, 2 023. Actual revenues for the period ending December 31, 2020 were $60,773,107. This means that the City of Colton experienced a $17,167,734 revenue shortfall for the period ending December 31, 2020 which may be attributed to the COVID–19 public health emergency.

This total amount, or any portion thereof, is an eligible expense under ARPA funding rules.

Because the first year calculation of general revenue loss exceeds the City’s SLFRF funding amount, estimating future actual revenues to net from counterfactual revenue was not a necessary exercise for reimbursement purposes.

 PREMIUM PAY FOR ESSENTIAL WORKERS EARNING MODEST WAGES The Treasury Department guidance provides flexibility to state and local governments to provide premium pay to essential worker s. The rule names a number of qualifying sectors, including health care, public health and safety, education, transportation, and food production and services, but also provides governments with the ability to add other sectors deemed critical during the p andemic. On March 19, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-33-20 directing all residents immediately to heed current State public health directives to stay at home, except as needed to maintain continuity of operations of essential critical infr astructure sectors. In accordance with the order, the State Public Health Officer designated the following sectors of “Essential Critical Infrastructure Workers” to help state, local, and industry partners as they work to protect communities: Health and P ublic Health, Emergency Services, Food and Agriculture, Energy, Water and Wastewater, Transportation and Logistics, Communications and Information Technology, Government Operations and Other Community -Based Essential Functions, Critical Manufacturing. Fina ncial Services, Chemical, Defense Industrial Base, and Industrial, Commercial, Residential and Sheltering Facilities and Services.

ARPA allows for premium pay to be awarded at up to $13 per hour, to a maximum of $25,000 per worker. The rule clarifies that governments should prioritize compensation for lower-income eligible workers, and imposes additional reporting requirements if they award premium pay to workers such that they would earn at least 50% more than their state’s average wage.

3 Packet Pg. 206
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds
January 4, 2022

Page 6 ends

Importantly, sta te and local officials can apply premium pay retrospectively for work performed at any time since the start of the pandemic —recognizing that many essential workers have yet to be adequately compensated for work they previously performed. At the same time, the rule also provides flexibility to recipient governments to apply premium pay prospectively.

 INVESTMENTS IN QUALIFYING INFRASTRUCTURE
ARPA specifies that State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds can support necessary investments in drinking water, waste a nd storm water , and high -quality broadband service. The interim final rule takes this a step further, defining “necessary” investments as those “designed to provide an adequate minimum level of service and are unlikely to be made using private sources of funds.”

For water and sewer investments, the rule aligns eligible uses to projects that would be eligible for support from the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund or Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. In this way, governmen ts can expedite project identification and investment, and create a near -term positive impact on community public health and well -being. The rule also “encourages” recipients to select projects that will improve resiliency to the effects of climate change, consistent with efforts to protect lower-income communities that tend to be most affected by climate disasters; and to replace lead service lines associated with negative lifelong impacts for exposed children.

ARP’s investments in broadband infrastructur e represent a direct response to the pandemic-revealed need for reliable, high -speed internet access for remote school, work, and health care delivery. The rule specifies that eligible investments must be designed to provide services that meet “adequate” s peeds—at least 100 megabits per second wherever practicable —for unserved and underserved households and businesses.

Importantly, the rule also emphasizes that financial assistance to impacted households for broadband subscriptions and digital literacy are also eligible uses.

The rule also clarifies that general infrastructure projects —say, road construction or bridge repair unrelated to COVID -19—are not permitted uses of the flexible ARP A resources. State, local, and tribal governments may be able to draw on other ARP A provisions to support infrastructure investments in transit, school buildings, and housing, but the Treasury Department’s guidance largely precludes governments from using these flexible resources to tackle their capital projects list.

INELIGIBLE USES

While the Treasury Department’s rule provides a good deal of discretion to state, local, and tribal governments on their use of recovery funds (consistent with the ARP statute), it also spells out several things for which they cannot use the dollars. These include:
3 Packet Pg. 207
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds
January 4, 2022

Page 7 ends

 Offset tax reductions or delay a tax or tax increase;  Funds cannot be deposited into any pension fund;
 Utilizing funds as a match toward other federal grants;  Paying interest or principal on outstanding debt;
 Legal settlements or judgements;
 Infrastructure spending outside of water, wastewater, and broadband investments or above the amount allocated under the revenue loss provision;  Contributing to rainy day funds or financial reserves.

These provisions of the rule implement certa in statutory prohibitions, and aim to ensure that expenditures address the impacts of the pandemic rather than longer -running fiscal issues facing state, local, and tribal governments.

REPORTING AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS

In General, a recipient may only use funds to cover costs incurred during the period beginning March 3, 2021, and ending December 31, 2024, for one or more of the purposes enumerated in sections 602(c)(1) and 603(c)(1) of the Social Security Act, as applicable, including those enumerated in section § 35.6 of this subpart, subject to the restrictions set forth in sections 602(c)(2) and 603(c)(2) of the Social Security Act, as applicable . A recipient must return any funds not obligated by December 31, 2024, and any funds not expended to cover such obligations by December 31, 2026.

Recipients of Fiscal Recovery Funds are required to submit one interim report and thereafter quarterly Project and Expenditure reports until the end of the award period. Treasury extended the deadline for submission of the first Project and Expenditure Reports originally due October 31, 2021 to January 31, 2022, and will cover the period between the award date to December 31, 2021. The quarterly Project and Expenditure reports will include financial data, informatio n on contracts and sub -awards over $50,000, types of projects funded, and other information regarding a recipient’s utilization of the award funds.

ARPA makes it clear that a nexus to one of the broad use categories described above is required and that th e Federal government will conduct audits to ensure spending is in line with ARPA requirements. Jurisdictions who cannot clearly demonstrate a nexus will have to pay funds back to the US Treasury. To help ensure this, ARPA provides $77 million for the Gover nment Accountability Office and $40 million for the Pandemic Response and Accountability Committee for oversight and to promote transparency and accountability. As part of the accountability and transparency, local jurisdiction s will be required to provide “periodic reporting” on their expenses. Future guidance is expected to provide clarity on regularity and details of required reporting.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
3 Packet Pg. 208
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds
January 4, 2022

Page 8 ends

One-time funds. As ARPA funds are non-recurring, their use should be applied primarily to non- recurring expenditures.
 Care should be taken to avoid creating new programs or add -ons to existing programs that require an ongoing financial commitment and/or additional staffing to manage the programming.
 The use of ARPA funds to cover operating deficits cause d by COVID -19 should be considered temporary, and additional budget restraint may be necessary to achieve/maintain structural balance in future budgets.
 Investment in critical infrastructure is particularly well -suited use of ARPA funds because it is a non -recurring expenditure that can be targeted to strategically important long-term assets that provide benefits over many years. However, care should be taken to assess any ongoing operating costs that may be associated with the project.

ARPA Scanning and Partnering Efforts. State and local jurisdictions should be aware of plans for ARPA funding throughout their communities.
 Local jurisdictions should be cognizant of state -level ARPA efforts, especially regarding infrastructure, potential enhancements of sta te funding resources, and existing or new state law requirements.
 Consider regional initiatives, including partnering with other ARPA recipients. It is possible there are many beneficiaries of ARPA funding within your community, such as schools, transportation agencies, and local economic development authorities. Be sure to understand what they are planning and augment their efforts; alternatively, creating cooperative spending plans to enhance the structural financial condition of your community.

Take Ti me and Careful Consideration . ARPA funds will be issued in two tranches to local governments. Throughout the years of outlays and until the end of the calendar year 2024, consider how the funds may be used to address rescue efforts and lead to recovery.  Use other dedicated grants and programs first whenever possible and save ARPA funds for priorities not eligible for other federal and state assistance programs.  Whenever possible, expenditures related to the ARPA funding should be spread over the qualifying period (through December 31, 2024) to enhance budgetary and financial stability.
 Adequate time should be taken to carefully consider all alternatives for the prudent use of ARPA funding prior to committing the resources to ensure the best use of the tempor ary funding.

The influx of funds will undoubtedly benefit state and local finances and aid in the recovery from the budgetary, economic, and financial impacts of the pandemic. Rating agencies will evaluate a government’s use of the ARPA funds to formulate its credit opinion and, importantly, consider the City’s level of reserves and structural budget balance, or efforts to return to structural balance, as part of their credit analysis. City Leadership and Finance Officers will play a critical 3 Packet Pg. 209
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds
January 4, 2022

Page 9 ends

role in highl ighting the need to use ARPA funds prudently with an eye towards long -term financial stability and sustainable operating performance. The funding provided under ARPA provides a unique opportunity for state and local governments to make strategic investment s in long-lived assets, rebuild reserves to enhance financial stability, and cover temporary operating shortfalls until economic conditions and operations normalize.

Recommendation
As the extent of the City’s actual and estimated revenue loss exceeds the amount the City has and will receive, it is recommended that the entirety of the City’s SLFRF disbursement be reported as revenue loss. This will give the City the maximum flexibility in utilizing the funds for general governmental services, allowing the City to prioritize and address a variety of projects and objectives citywide without being subject to the more restrictive requirements of categorical spending.

On Monday, November 15, 2021, the Finance Committee met to discuss the Local Fiscal Recovery Funds and the City’s options. The Finance Committee concurred with staff’s recommendations to report the funding for the eligible use category of replacing lost revenue for the provision of government services (Revenue Loss category) and to prioritize an d allocate the funds not previously allocated to hazard pay for essential workers through the FY2022-23 budget development process.

FISCAL IMPACTS

The City of Colton’s funding allocation of local fiscal recovery funds is $14,88 1,400, based on the report issued by the U.S. Department of Treasury. The first payment equal to one-half of the City’s allocation totaling $7,440,700 was received by the City in mid -July 2021. SLFRF recipients must return any funds not obligated by December 31, 2024 and any funds not fully expended to cover these obligations by December 31, 2026.

Adoption of Resolution R -03-22 increases revenue in Local Fiscal Recovery Fund revenue account number 219-5719-000 to accept the first tranche of the funding allocation.

ALTERNATIVES

 Provide staff alternative direction

ATTACHMENT

1. R-03-22 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 3 Packet Pg. 210
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

RESOLUTION NO. R-03-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLTON TO: 1. ACCEPT $14,880,000 FOR THE AMERICAN

RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) CORONAVIRUS LOCAL FISCAL
RECOVERY FUNDS; 2. TO AMEND THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL
YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 20 21 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 20 22 IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 7,440,000 FOR THE FIRST TRANCHE OF
STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS ; 3. TO

APPROVE THE USE OF THE REVENUE LOSS CATEGORY IN
THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY’S INTERIM FINAL RULE
FOR THE PROVISION OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES; AND, 4.

RELATED MATTERS.

WHEREAS, on March 11, 2021, the United States Congress passed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (APRA), which provides fiscal relief funds to State and Local Governments, and other program areas aimed at mitigating the continu ing effects of the COVID -19 Pandemic; and,

WHEREAS, ARPA is intended to provide support to local governments in responding to the impact of COVID -19 and in their efforts to contain COVID -19 in their communities, residences, and businesses; and,

WHEREAS, ARPA includes State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) to support urgent COVID-19 response efforts to decrease the spread of the virus; to replace lost public sector revenue to strengthen support for vital public services; to support immediate econo mic stabilization for households and businesses; and to address systemic public health and economic challenges that have contributed to unequal impacts of the pandemic on certain populations; and,

WHEREAS, the United Stated Treasury has adopted the Inter im Final Rule as guidance regarding the use of ARPA funds; and,

WHEREAS, in July 2021, the United States Treasury disbursed the City of Colton’s first tranche of funds, totaling Seven Million, Four Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars ($7,440,000), and is scheduled to receive the second, equal tranche in July 2022; and,

WHEREAS, that as recipient, the City of Colton accepts award of Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Funds allocation up to the maximum allocation pursuant to the terms and conditions of ARPA; and,

WHEREAS, in accordance with the prescribed formula provided by the United States Department of Treasury, the City of Colton’s calculation determined the City’s entire allocation to be eligible for replacement of lost revenue; and,

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept such funding and authorize the use of such funding for the eligible use category of replacing lost revenue for the provision of government services (Revenue Loss category) as set forth in the Interim Final Rule issue s by the Department of Treasury to implement the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund established under ARPA, which the City will prioritize and allocate through the FY2022 -23 budget development process;

3.a
Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: R-03-22 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (3298 : American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

- 2 -

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Coun cil of the City of Colton does hereby find, determine and declare as follows:

SECTION 1. It is necessary to make an amendment to the FY2021-22 Budget to increase revenues in Local Fiscal Recovery Fund account number 219 -5719-000 by $7,440,000 to accept the first tranche of the City’s allocation.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the use of the Revenue Loss category for the City’s entire allocation of Local Fiscal Recovery Funds for the provision of government services.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby (i) authorizes the City Manager or his designee to prepare, submit, and publish the required reports regarding the use of the funds and other documents in connection with acceptance of these funds and to take such other actions as may be necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution and for the acceptance and administration of the grant, and (ii) ratifies the submittal of any reports previously submitted to the Department of Treasury.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of January, 2022.

ATTEST: FRANK J. NAVARRO
Mayor

CAROLINA R. PADILLA,
City Clerk

3.a
Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: R-03-22 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (3298 : American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds)

ITEM NO. 4

STAFF REPORT

DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: STACEY DABBS, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: APPROVE US BANK VOUCHER DATED 11/23/2021 FOR $37,280.50; VOUCHER NUMBERS 196187 TO 196254 DATED 12/09/2021 AND
TOTALING $500,150.99; REPLACEMENT CHECK NUMBER 196255
DATED 12/14/2021 FOR $129.68; VOUCHER NUMBERS 196256 TO 196370 DATED 12/16/2021 AND TOTALING $1,575,036.97 AND
PAYROLL DISBURSEMENT LISTING DATED 10/30/2021 TO
11/12/2021 AND TOTALING $965,532.50.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

Approve US Bank voucher dated 11/23/2021 for $37,280.50; voucher numbers 196187 to 196254 dated 12/09/2021 and totaling $500,150.99; replacement check number 196255 dated 12/14/2021 for $129.68; voucher numbers 196256 to 196370 dated 12/16/2021 and totaling $1,575,036.97 and payroll disbursement listing dated 10/30/2021 to 11/12/2021 and totaling $965,532.50.

BACKGROUND

The California G overnment Code requires that the legislative body ratify all vouchers issued in the course of conducting City business.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

All vouchers and related backup documentation have been reviewed by the City Treasurer.

FISCAL IMPACTS

4 Packet Pg. 213
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Warrants - Accounts Payable
January 4, 2022

Page 2 ends

None.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Fund number & Title legend

2. Voucher lists and payroll disbursements

ATTACHMENT

1. Fund Number and Title Legend

2. Voucher lists

3. Payroll Registers
4 Packet Pg. 214
City of Colton
Fund Number and Title Legend
Fund Title Fund Title
100 GENERAL FUND 701 LLMD #2
150 TREASURERS ACCOUNT GROUP 702 LLMD #1
206 COMMUN ITY CHILD CARE 703 CFO 87-1 DEBT SERV ICE
209 DSF FLY CONSERVATION 704 CFO 87-1 CONSTRUCT ION
210 SPECIAL GAS TAX 707 CFO 88-1 DEBT SERV ICE
211 LIBRARY GRANT FUND 708 CFO 88-1 CONSTRUCTION
212 STATE TRAFFIC RELIEF FUND 709 DSF FLY CONSERVATION
213 S.Y.E.T .P. GRANT 722 STORM WATER
214 POLLUT ION REDUCT ION FUND 733 CFO 89-1 CONSTRUCT ION 215 COMMUNITY DEV ACT FUND 734 CFO 89-2 CONSTRUCT ION
216 CDBG HOUS ING REHAB FUND 744 CFO 89-1 DEBT SERV ICE 217 DRUG/GANG INTERVENTION 745 CFO 89-2 DEBT SERV ICE
218 MEASURE I FUND 750 AQUA MANSA CFO
219 STATE AID- CAPITAL PROJECTS 754 SB COUNTY HOSPITAL
220 Vi Tep 762 TRUST AND AGENCY
225 MISC GRANTS 766 DEFERRED COMPENSAT ION
240 HOST CITY FEES - CIP 781 CFO 90-1 DEBT SERVICE
247 Quimby In Lieu Fees 782 CFO 90-1 CONSTRUCT ION
248 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 850 Redeve lopment Obligation Retirement Fund 249 TRAFF IC IMPACT FUND 851 Successor Agency Administration 250 NEW FAC ILITIES DEVELOPMENT FEE 855 Hous ing Auth - RM PARK DEVELOPMENT 251 CIVIC CENTER DEVELOPMENT FEE 856 Housing Auth - RANCHO MED BOND PROCEEDS 252 FIRE FAC ILITY DEVELOPMENT FEE 857 LMI Asset Fund
253 POLICE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FEE 864 Housing Auth - LOW/MOD BOND PROCEEDS 261 ASSET FORFEITURE 865 Housing Auth - RANCHO MED CHFA 326 AD 94-1 DEBT SERVICE 866 ECONOM IC DEVELOPMENT
332 1971 SEWER BONDS, A & C 867 Consolidation Proj_08 -09 350 PFA Debt Fund 870 Housing Auth - RM PARK OPERAT IONS 357 POB-Non Enterprise 871 Successor Agcy-RANCHO/M ILL PROJECT AREA 358 PENS ION OBLIGATION DEBT SERV ICE 872 Succe ssor Agcy-RANCHO/MILL DEBT SERV ICE 359 CORP YARD DEBT SERV ICE 873 Successor Agcy-RDA II PROJECT FUND 363 1978-2 ASSESSMENT DIST . 874 Housing Auth - LOW/MOD DEBT SERV ICE 364 WATER IMPRVMNT DIST A 875 Housing Auth - LOW/MOD BOND PROCEEDS 379 AD 1979-1 DEBT SERV ICE 876 Successor Agcy-SANTA ANA RIV BND PROCEED 427 AD 94-1 CONSTRUCT ION 877 Successor Agcy-SANTA ANA RIVER CIP 450 Capita l Improvement Project s 878 RDA FIXED ASSETS GROUP 451 Colton Crossing Fund 879 Successor Agcy-WEST VALLEY CIP 453 STREET IMPROVEMENTS PRGM 881 Successor Agcy-MT VERNON BOND PROCEEDS 457 CAP ITAL IMPROVEMENT 882 Successo r Agcy-MT VERNON CIP 469 EQU IPMENT REPLACEMENT 885 Successor Agcy -MT VERNON DEBT SERV ICE 520 ELECTR IC UTILITY 886 RDA ADM INISTRAT ION
521 WATER UTILITY 887 COOLEY RANCH - now 894
522 WAS TEWATER UTILITY 888 MT VERNON - now 882
523 SOLID WASTE 889 WEST VALLEY - now 879
524 CEMETERY 890 Successor Agcy-RDA - LONG TERM DEBT GRP 525 RECYCLING 891 Successo r Agcy-RDA I DEBT SERV ICE FUND 526 PUBLIC BENEFIT FUND 892 Successor Agcy-RDA I - CAP ITAL PROJECTS 527 WASTEWATER UTILITY - GRAND TERRACE 893 Successor Agcy -RDA II DEBT SERV ICE FUND 551 WATER DEVELOPMENT 894 Successor Agcy -COOLEY RANCH PRO JECT 552 SEWER DEVELOPMENT 895 Successor Agcy-COOLEY RANCH DEBT SERV 560 CEMETARY ENDOWMENT CARE 896 SANTA ANA RIVER - now 877 605 Facility & Equipment Maintenance Fund 897 Successor Agcy-SANTA ANA RIVER DEBT SVC 606 INFORMATION SERV ICES FUND 898 Housing Auth - LOW/MOD CAPITAL PROJECTS 607 INSURANCE FUND 899 Successor Agcy-WEST VALLEY PRJ - DBT SV 608 AUTOMOT IVE SHOP 941 GENERAL LONG -TERM DEBT
610 AUTOMOT IVE SHOPS 958 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS
990 GASB 34

4.a
Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Fund Number and Title Legend (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 230
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 258
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 259
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 265
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 267
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.b
Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Voucher lists (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.c
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Payroll Registers (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.c
Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Payroll Registers (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.c
Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Payroll Registers (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.c
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Payroll Registers (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.c
Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Payroll Registers (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.c
Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: Payroll Registers (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.c
Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Payroll Registers (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.c
Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Payroll Registers (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.c
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Payroll Registers (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

4.c
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Payroll Registers (3452 : Warrants - Accounts Payable)

ITEM NO. 5

STAFF REPORT

DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: BRIAN DICKINSON, PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITY SERVICES

DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: APPROVE PLANS FOR THE LA CADENA DR. SIDEWALK

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND THE DOWNTOWN PASEO
PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

It is recommended that the City Council take the following action:

1. Approve plans for the La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project and the Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project.

2. Reject all bids for the Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project.

3. Authorize staff to solicit bid for the La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project and re-bid the Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND

La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project
The completed development at the southwest corner of La Cadena Drive and Tropica Rancho Road has installed sidewalk along the project frontage as part of project’s conditions of approval.

The completion of this development has left a sidewalk gap between Litton Avenue and the south end corner of the project. The La Cadena Drive Sidewalk Improvement Project will complete the sidewalk gap. The scope of work for the Project includes installation of sidewalk and retaining wall to protect slopes and utility power poles. The length of the sidewalk is approximately 725 linear feet. The project location is attached as Exhibit A. 5 Packet Pg. 282
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project
January 4, 2022

Page 2 ends

Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project
The City of Colton received a SB 848 Grant from the California Natural Resources Agency ($600,000) to redevelop and enhance a pedestrian walkway in the City’s downtown area (“Downtown Pedestrian Paseo”). The City’s Downtown Desig n Manual, adopted in August 2016, identified two pedestrian paseos, of which this is the first segment to receive grant funding.

The project is an approximately 484 feet long and 20 feet wide alley, and extends from La Cadena Drive on the east to 7 th Street on the west. The walkway has become extremely blighted over the past several years, with trash accumulation, homeless camping, graffiti and crime being ongoing concerns. The intent of this improvement project is to create a safe and inviting pedestrian path in the heart of downtown, develop a new community event/gathering space, and foster exterior upgrades to the surrounding businesses. The project scope of work include s concrete, fencing, landscaping and other amenities shown on the plans attached as Exhibit B.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

On October 1, 2020, the City received the following bids for the Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project:

1. Horizons Construction $ 637,358.50

2. Three Peaks Corporation $ 670,715.25

3. Jergensen’s Construction $ 810,314.59

4. Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. $ 854,300.00

5. Spec Construction, Inc. $1,029,062.00

The apparent lowest bid in the amount of $637,358.50 is 33% higher that the engineer’s estimate.

The engineer’s estimate for the Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvemen t Project is $477,047.

Since the bids received are much higher than the Engineer’s Estimate and project budget, staff recommends rejecting these bids and requests authorization to re -solicit bids by constructing the Phase I as indicated on the project plan.

The La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project and the Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project plans are 100% complete and ready to advertise for the bidding process.

As required on Section 3.08.05 (F) of the Colton Municipal Code, the City Council needs to approve the plans and working drawings (see Exhibit A and B) of any public projects that are more than fifty thousand dollars. Both of these projects exceed the threshold required by the Code. The plans and specifications for the La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project was prepared by CASC Engineering, Inc. The Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project was prepared by Architerra Design Group, Inc..

FISCAL IMPACTS
5 Packet Pg. 283
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project
January 4, 2022

Page 3 ends

Below outlines the available appropriations in the FY2021-22 adopted budget for the projects:

A. La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project
a. 450-2140-6954-3890 = $ 60,662.70
b. 218-2222-6150-3890 = $130,000.00
Total = $190,662.00

B. Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project:
c. 225-6300-6306-2350 = $430,529.06

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Staff recommends that the La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project and the Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project be determined categorically exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301(c) - Existing highways and streets.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT

1. Exhibit A – Plans for La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project

2. Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project 5 Packet Pg. 284

ENGINEER'S NOTICE TO CONTRACTORCONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFETY CITY OF COLTONCOUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIASTREET IMPROVEMENT PLANSLA CADENA DRIVESTA. 73+93.26 TO STA. 80+62.40INDEX MAP

SHEET INDEXLEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS

STREET IMPROVEMENT GENERAL NOTES

UTILITY NOTIFICATION
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCASCEngineering and Consulting
“”
”“”“”
SHEET 2SHEET 3

REFERENCE DRAWINGS
BASIS OF BEARING“”
“”“”“”

SITE LOCATIONEARTHWORK QUANTITIES

5.a
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Exhibit A – Plans for La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCASCEngineering and Consulting“””“”“”

LINE DATACURVE DATA

5.a
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Exhibit A – Plans for La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCASCEngineering and Consulting“””“”“”

LINE DATA

5.a
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Exhibit A – Plans for La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCASCEngineering and Consulting“””“”“”

5.a
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Exhibit A – Plans for La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

PROJECT LOCATION

SHEET KEY MAP:

VICINITY MAP:

ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT THE DESIGN, DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS ASREPRESENTED HEREIN MEET PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS. ARCHITERRA DESIGNGROUP CANNOT GUARANTEE THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION OR MAINTENANCE OFIMPROVEMENTS AS DESIGNED AND/OR SPECIFIED HEREIN AND DISCLAIMS ANY FUTURE LIABILITY RESULTINGFROM DEVIATIONS. ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE AMOUNT OR FREQUENCY OFIRRIGATION WATER APPLIED TO THE PROJECT DURING CONSTRUCTION OR THEREAFTER.

FIRST SUBMITTAL: 02/20/2020 (60% CITY REVIEW)SECOND SUBMITTAL: 03/010/2020 (90% CITY REVIEW)THIRD SUBMITTAL: 04/08/2020 (100% CITY REVIEW)FOURTH SUBMITTAL: 05/19/2020 (FINAL CITY REVIEW)DEVELOPMENT SERVICESDEPARMENT, CITY OF COLTON659 N. LA CADENA DRIVECOLTON, CA 92324TEL: (909) 370-5079CONTACT: MARK TOMICH JRMA - ARCHITECTURE2700 SATURN STREETBREA,CA, 92821TEL: (714) 524-1870CONTACT:MIGUEL IBARRA SUBMITTALS:

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSFOR
REVISIONS:

DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:

NO. SHEET TITLEA.B.Anchor BoltA.C.Asphaltic ConcreteAdj. AdjacentAlt. AlternateArch.ArchitectAuto.AutomaticBldg.BuildingBlk. BlackB.M.Bench MarkB.S.Bottom of StepsC.B.Catch BasinC.F.Cubic FootC.I. Cast IronC.I.P.Cast In PlaceC.J.Cold JointC.L.Center LineClr. ClearanceC.O.Clean OutC.M.U.Concrete Masonry UnitComp.CompactedConc.ConcreteCond.ConditionCont.ContinuousCt. CenterCtr. SinkCounter SinkD.D.Deck DrainD.F.Douglas FirD.G.Decomposed GraniteDia.DiameterDim.DimensionDtl. DetailEa. EachE.J. Expansion JointElec.ElectricEng.EngineerEsp.EspalierEq. EqualE.W.Each WayE.W.W.M.Electric Welded Wire MeshEx. ExistingExp.ExposedF.F.E.Finished Floor ElevationF.G.Finish GradeF.H.Fire HydrantFin. FinishF.L. Flow LineFlt. FlatF.S.Finish SurfaceFtg. FootingFtn. FountainGa. GaugeGalv.GalvanizedG.C.GroundcoverG.I. Galvanized IronG.P.H.Gallons Per Hour G.P.M.Gallons Per MinuteH.B.Hose BibHdr. Brd.Header BoardHoriz. HorizontalH.P.High PointHgt.HeightI.D. Inside DiameterINV.InvertInt. IntegralJ. BoxJunction BoxJts. JointsL.A.Landscape ArchitectLic. LicensedL.P.Low PointMax.MaximumM.B.Machine BoltMech.MechanicalMed.MediumMin.MinimumM.H.ManholeM.P.R.Match Precipitation RateMulti.MultipleNat.NaturalN.T.S.Not To ScaleO.C.On CenterO.D.Outside DiameterP.A.Planter AreaP.C.Point of CurvatureP.C.C.Point of Compound CurvatureP.R.C.Point of Reverse CurvaturePerf.PerforatedP.O.C.Point of ConnectionP.L.Property LineP.S.I.Pounds Per Square InchP.T.Pressure TreatedP.V.C.Poly Vinyl ChlorideR. RadiusR.C.P.Reinforced Concrete PipeRebar.Reinforcing BarRef.ReferenceReq’d.RequiredRet.RetardantRgh.RoughR.S.Rough SawnR.S.R.Rough Sawn RedwoodRwd.RedwoodR.W.Recycled WaterSch.ScheduleS.F.Square FootSht.SheetSht. Mtl.Sheet MetalSim.SimilarS.L.Score LineSmth.SmoothSpecs. Specifications Spp.SpeciesSq. Square2STA.StationStl. SteelSTD.StandardT.A.D.Top Area of DrainT. & B.Top and BottomT.B.Top of BermT.C.Top of CurbTex.Texture(d)T.G.Top of GrateT.G.D. Top of Grate DrainThk.ThickT.P.Top of PavingT.P.C.Top of Pool CopingT.S.Top of StepsT.W.Top of WallTwl.TrowelTyp.TypicalUV.R.Ultraviolet RadiationVert.VerticalW/ WithW/OWithoutW.P.C.Water Pressure CompensatingW.Q.Water Surface(#) Number / QuantityABBREVIATION NOTES:A.ABBREVIATIONS MAY BE SHOWN ASEITHER UPPERCASE AND/OR LOWERCASEON PLANS, AND WITH OR WITHOUTPERIODS.B.TO SHOW QUANTITIES IN THESE DOCUMENTS THE CONVENTION OF SHOWING THE NUMBER IN PARENTHESISIS USED. EXAMPLE: 'TWO TONS' MAY BESHOWN AS '(2) TONS.' T-1C1.0C1.1L-1.1L-1.2L-2.1L-2.2L-3.1L-3.2L-3.3L-3.4L-3.5L-3.6L-4.1L-4.2L-4.3L-4.4L-4.5L-5.1L-5.2L-5.3L-5.4A-1.0E-1.0E-2.0E-2.1 TITLE SHEETSURVEY PLAN 1SURVEY PLAN 2DEMOLITION PLAN 1DEMOLITION PLAN 2GRADING PLAN 1GRADING PLAN 2CONSTRUCTION PLAN 1CONSTRUCTION PLAN 2CONSTRUCTION DETAILSCONSTRUCTION DETAILSCONSTRUCTION DETAILSCONSTRUCTION DETAILSIRRIGATION PLAN 1IRRIGATION PLAN 2IRRIGATION DETAILSIRRIGATION DETAILSIRRIGATION CALCULATIONSPLANTING PLAN 1PLANTING PLAN 2PLANTING DETAILSPLANTING DETAILSARCHITECTURAL PLANELECTRICAL SITE PLANELECTRICAL SYMBOLS, LINE DIAGRAMSLIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE, GENERAL 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526
CITY OF COLTONDOWNTOWN PEDESTRIANPASEO IMPROVEMENTSPHASE 1 & 2

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
NORTH 7TH STREET
SEE SHEETS L-1.1,L-2.1, L-3.1, L-4.1
SEE SHEETS L-1.2,L-2.2, L-3.2, L-4.2
N.T.S.

NORTH
ERRORS AND OMISSIONS:
215
215
10 SANTA ANA RIVER

COLTON AVENUE
W. VALLEY BLVD

C STREET

OLIVE STREET

H STREET
E STREETMT. VERNON AVENUE

CADENA DRIVE
N.T.S.NORTHLA
ALL CONSTRUCTION ON OFF-SITE OR ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL ADHERE TO NATIONALPOLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP’S)TO PREVENT DELETERIOUS MATERIAL OR POLLUTANTS FROM ENTERING THE CITY OR COUNTYSTORM DRAIN SYSTEMS.THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE ADHERED TO:1. HANDLE, STORE AND DISPOSE OF MATERIALS PROPERLY.2. AVOID EXCAVATION AND GRADING ACTIVITIES DURING WET WEATHER.3. CONSTRUCT DIVERSION DIKES AND DRAINAGE SWALES AROUND WORKING SITES.4. COVER STOCKPILES AND EXCAVATED SOIL WITH SECURED TARPS OR PLASTIC SHEETING.5. DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT EROSION CONTROL PLANS AND PROVIDE A COPY TO THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER.6. CHECK AND REPAIR LEAKING EQUIPMENT AWAY FROM CONSTRUCTION SITE.7. DESIGNATE A LOCATION AWAY FROM STORM DRAINS FOR REFUELING VEHICLES.8. WHEN WORKING NEAR CATCH BASINS, COVER AND SEAL EACH BASIN PRIOR TO THE START OFCONSTRUCTION.9. USE VACUUM WITH ALL CONCRETE SAWING OPERATIONS.10. NEVER WASH EXCESS MATERIAL FROM AGGREGATE, CONCRETE OR EQUIPMENT ONTO ASTREET.11. CATCH DRIPS FROM PAVER WITH DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENT MATERIAL.12. CLEAN UP ALL SPILLS USING DRY METHODS.13. GUTTERS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AFTER LEAVING CONSTRUCTION SITE. SWEEP ALL GUTTERSAT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.14. DURING CONSTRUCTION, DUMPSTER(S) SHALL BE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.15. CALL 911 IN CASE OF A HAZARDOUS SPILL.16. KEEP A RUNNING LOG OF ALL ACTIVITIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE “STORM WATERPOLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP).17. NAME A PERSON ON-SITE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH SWPPP.18. THE FOLLOWING BMP’S AS OUTLINED IN, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE “BEST MANAGEMENTPRACTICES HANDBOOK, CALIFORNIA STORMWATER QUALITY TASK FORCE, SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA, 1993”, OR THE LATEST REVISED EDITION, MAY APPLY DURING THE CONSTRUCTIONOF THIS PROJECT. (ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE BYCOUNTY INSPECTORS.

CA001 DEWATERING OPERATIONSCA002 PAVING OPERATIONSCA003 STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION & PAINTINGCA010 MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGECA011 MATERIAL USECA012 SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROLCA020 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENTCA021 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENTCA022 CONTAMINATED SOIL MANAGEMENTCA023 CONCRETE WASTE MANAGEMENTCA030 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT CLEANINGCA031 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT FUELINGCA032 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCECA040 EMPLOYEE/SUBCONTRACTOR TRAININGESC01 SCHEDULINGESC02 PRESERVATION OF EXIST VEGETATIONESC10 SEEDING AND PLANTINGESC11 MULCHINGESC20 GEOTEXTILES AND MATSESC21 DUST CONTROLSESC23 CONSTRUCTION ROAD STABILIZATIONESC24 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEESC30 EARTH DIKEESC31 TEMPORARY DRAINS AND SWALESESC32 SLOPE DRAINESC40 OUTLET PROTECTIONESC41 CHECK DAMSESC42 SLOPE ROUGHENING/TERRACINGESC50 SILT FENCEESC51 STRAW BALE BARRIERSESC52 SAND BAG BARRIERESC53 BRUSH OR ROCK FILTERESC54 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTIONESC55 SEDIMENT TRAPESC56 SEDIMENT BASIN THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECORDS. THESE LOCATIONS AREAPPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE CONFIRMED IN THE FIELD BY THE CONTRACTOR, SO THAT ANY NECESSARY ADJUSTMENT CAN BE MADE IN ALIGNMENT AND/OR GRADE OF THE PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE TO PROTECT ANY UTILITY LINES SHOWN & ANY OTHER LINES NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THESEPLANS.THE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SUBSTRUCTURES IDENTIFIED ON THESE PLANS WERE TAKEN FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOWN ACCORDINGLY. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PART 1 SECTION 5, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (OR CALTRANSON STATE HIGHWAYS) TO IDENTIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, AND SHALL DETERMINE THEIR LOCATIONS & DEPTHS, INCLUDING SERVICE CONNECTIONSWHICH MAY AFFECT OR BE AFFECTED BY ITS OPERATIONS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON THE PROJECT. IF CONFLICTING UTILITIES ARE NOT BROUGHT TO THE ENGINEER'SATTENTION PRIOR TO THE START OF THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK, THE ENGINEER WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CHANGES, REVISIONS OR MODIFICATIONS.

ENGINEER'S NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR
ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS PERFORMING WORK SHOWN ON OR RELATED TO THESE PLANS SHALL CONDUCT THEIR OPERATIONS SO THAT ALL EMPLOYEES ARE PROVIDED A SAFEPLACE TO WORK AND THE PUBLIC IS PROTECTED. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE "OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATION" OF THEDEPARTMENT OF U.S. LABOR, AND WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS' "CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS".THE CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE IN ANY WAY FOR THE CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS COMPLIANCE WITH THE "OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS"OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OR WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS "CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS".IN SUBMITTING A BID FOR THIS WORK, THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME THE SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OFCONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT; INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY, THAT REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS;THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THEPERFORMANCE OF THE WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPT FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.

CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFETY
N.P.D.E.S.REQUIREMENTSN.P.D.E.S.BMP DETAILS
JCA ENGINEERING, INC. - ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING8048 PALM AVE.HIGHLAND, CA, 92346TEL: (909) 864-0223CONTACT: JAMES CORNS N. 7TH STREETN. 9TH STREET
FIFTH SUBMITTAL: 12/03/2021 (VALUE ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL) PHASE LINE -PHASE 1
PHASE LINE -PHASE 2
PHASE 2PHASE 1

5.b
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

5.b
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

5.b
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
NORTH 7TH STREET
PUMP
C
DEMOLITION LEGEND:DEMOLITION CALLOUTS: 1 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVING. SAW-CUT AT JOINT LINES. 2 REMOVE COLORED CONCRETE PAVING. SAW-CUT AT JOINT LINES. 3 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB. 4 REMOVE COLUMN AND FOOTING. 5 REMOVE SOLID ROOF OVERHEAD AND CONNECTION TO BUILDING. 6 REMOVE ASPHALT PAVING AND BASE. 7 REMOVE TREE. STUMP GRIND AND REMOVE ALL ROOTS LARGERTHAN 1" TO 24" BELOW GRADE. ITY OF COLTON TO REMOVE LIGHTING PRIOR TO TREE REMOVAL. 8 REMOVE PLANTS AND SOIL TO 6" BELOW EXISTING GRADE. 9 REMOVE GRAVEL.10REMOVE BENT COMMUNICATION BOX STEEL LID AND CONCRETE FRAME.11REMOVE SALVAGE LIGHT FIXTURE. DELIVER TO CITY OF COLTON FOR REUSE.12REMOVE CONCRETE STEP.13REMOVE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE.14REMOVE PIPE BOLLARDS.15REMOVE METAL ENCLOSURE.EXISTING TO REMAIN:

EXISTING TO REMAIN:E1EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE. SAWCUT AT EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMOVE.E2EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E3EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E4EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX TO REMAIN, RAISE BOX TO NEW FINISH SURFACE.E5EXISTING WATER METER ENCLOSURE TO REMAIN, RAISE BOX TO NEW FINISH SURFACE.E6EXISTING COLUMN AND SOLID ROOF OVERHEAD TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E7EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER AND CABINET TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E8EXISTING MANHOLE TO REMAIN. RAISE MANHOLE TO NEW FINISH SURFACE.E9EXISTING IRRIGATION VALVE BOX TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.E10EXISTING FIRE POST INDICATOR VALVE TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.E11EXISTING CONCRETE CURB TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.E12EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING LOT TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.E13EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.

IRRIGATION REMOVAL NOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL IRRIGATION LATERAL PIPES,IRRIGATION HEADS, AND IRRIGATION VALVES LOCATED WITHIN THE DEMOLITIONAREA. CAP EXISTING MAINLINE CONNECTION.

SALVAGE NOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH OWNER OR OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVEREGARDING REMOVAL, STORAGE, AND RELOCATION OF ALL ITEMS INDICATEDFOR SALVAGE.

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
NORTH 7TH STREET

SHEET KEY
SEE SHEETS L-1.1,L-2.1, L-3.1, L-4.1SEE SHEETS L-1.2,L-2.2, L-3.2, L-4.2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-1.2
DEMOLITION NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY DAMAGE, WHETHER INSIDE OR OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT LIMITS, TO UTILITY SYSTEMS,SURFACE PAVEMENTS, FIXTURES, STRUCTURES, OR VEGETATION THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AS PART OF THISDEMOLITION PLAN. ALL DAMAGED ITEMS SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION, AS ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER.2. EXCEPT FOR MATERIALS INDICATED TO BE SALVAGED AND RELOCATED ON SITE, ALL CLEARED MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE CONTRACTOR'SPROPERTY AND SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY OFF-SITE. SEPARATE RECYCLABLE MATERIALS PRODUCED DURING SITECLEARING FROM OTHER NONRECYCLABLE MATERIALS. STORE OR STOCKPILE WITHOUT INTERMIXING WITH OTHER MATERIALS AND TRANSPORTTHEM TO RECYCLING FACILITIES.3. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO SUBMIT PHOTOGRAPHS OR VIDEOTAPE, SUFFICIENTLY DETAILED, OF EXISTING CONDITIONS OF TREES AND PLANTINGS,ADJOINING CONSTRUCTION, AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT MIGHT BE MISCONSTRUED AS DAMAGE CAUSED BY SITE CLEARING.4. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO SUBMIT RECORD DRAWINGS IDENTIFYING AND ACCURATELY LOCATING CAPPED UTILITIES AND OTHER SUBSURFACESTRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, AND MECHANICAL CONDITIONS.5. LOCATE AND CLEARLY FLAG ALL TREES AND VEGETATION TO REMAIN OR BE RELOCATED.6. PROVIDE TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION AND DISCHARGE OF SOIL-BEARINGWATER RUNOFF OR AIRBORNE DUST TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND WALKWAYS.7. THE EXISTENCE AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AREOBTAINED BY THE AVAILABLE RECORDS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT UTILITY LINESSHOWN AND ANY OTHER LINES NOT OF RECORD AND NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL TOLL FREE UNDERGROUNDSERVICE ALERT TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO STARTING ANY EXCAVATION WORK.8. REMOVE SLABS, PAVING, CURBS, GUTTERS, AND AGGREGATE BASE AS INDICATED. NEATLY SAW CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN BEFOREREMOVING EXISTING PAVEMENT. PAINT ENDS OF STEEL REINFORCEMENT IN CONCRETE TO REMAIN TO PREVENT CORROSION.

PROTECTION NOTES:1.REGARDING THE "SAFE ZONE" FOR EXISTING TREES: BEFORE BEGINNING ANY DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, INSTALL A TEMPORARYPLASTIC ORANGE WEB FENCE AROUND ALL EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE.THE FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM OF 15' AWAYFROM THE TRUNK (OR AS FAR AWAY FROM THE TRUNK AS POSSIBLE). PROTECTION BARRIER SHALL CONSIST OF 3' MINIMUM HIGH PLASTIC WEB FENCINGATTACHED TO #4 REBAR STAKES. ALL CONTRACTORS AND THEIR CREWS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED INSIDE THIS “SAFE ZONE”, NOR SHALL THEY BE ALLOWEDTO STORE OR DUMP FOREIGN MATERIALS WITHIN THIS AREA. NO WORK OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING TRENCHING, SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE SAFE ZONEEXCEPT AS DESCRIBED BELOW. THE FENCING SHALL REMAIN AROUND EACH TREE TO BE SAVED UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.2.ALL ELEMENTS TO REMAIN AND SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE IN PLACE. ANY ITEMS OR MATERIALS DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF THE CONTRACTOR'SOPERATIONS SHALL BE REPLACED IN KIND, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER.

CLEARING NOTES:1.BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE INITIATED THE INDIVIDUAL TREES TO BE PROTECTED SHALL BE CLEARLY TAGGED. THE ZONES BENEATHTHE TREE CANOPY SHALL BE PROTECTED AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR VEHICLE ACCESS OR PARKING.2.SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTS THAT ARE SCHEDULED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE REMOVED COMPLETELY AND THOROUGHLY. ALL ROOTS THAT AREOVER 1/2" INCH IN DIAMETER SHALL BE GRUBBED AND REMOVED TO 18" BELOW GRADE MINIMUM. ALL ROOTS WITHIN THE TOP 6" OF SOIL SURFACE SHALLBE REMOVED. DO NOT DISTURB ROOTS OF TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN.3.EXPOSED ROOTS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN THAT ARE OVER 1" IN DIAMETER SHALL BE INSPECTED BY A CITY-APPROVED ARBORIST TO DETERMINEIF CUTTING IS RECOMMENDED. ANY SUCH INDICATED ROOTS SHALL BE CUT CLEANLY WITH CLEAN SHARP PRUNING TOOLS AND NOT RIPPED, TORN, ORCRUSHED. 1 11 3
333
67 1E2 E2
E2 E2 E2 E2
88888
8 9
6 3 9
10 10 10
E3
E3E4
E4
E4 6
L-1.1
E4
E1
SAWCUT
SAWCUT
SAWCUT
SAWCUT
SAWCUT
12 121212 12 12 1213
6E2
E11
E12E12
E11E4
E4
SAWCUT
3E4
15 EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX NOTE:1. IF THE EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX IS BROKEN OR UNSALVAGEABLEPRIOR TO DEMOLITION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE THEBOX ONLY WITH APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF COLTON.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY OF EXISTING UTILITY BOXES ARECONNECTED AND REQUIRED, CALL OUT DIGALERT TO LOCATION UTILITY RUNS.IF UTILITY HAS BEEN ABANDONED THE CONCRETE BOX SHALL BE REMOVEDDURING DEMOLITION.

PHASE 1PHASE 2
8 PHASE 1PHASE 2
E11E11
PHASE 2
PHASE 2PHASE 1
PHASE 1PHASE 2
PHASE 2
E11
9 9 9 9
E13
E13

5.b
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
PUMP
C
DEMOLITION LEGEND:DEMOLITION CALLOUTS: 1 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVING. SAW-CUT AT JOINT LINES. 2 REMOVE COLORED CONCRETE PAVING. SAW-CUT AT JOINT LINES. 3 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB. 4 REMOVE COLUMN AND FOOTING. 5 REMOVE SOLID ROOF OVERHEAD AND CONNECTION TO BUILDING. 6 REMOVE ASPHALT PAVING AND BASE. 7 REMOVE TREE. STUMP GRIND AND REMOVE ALL ROOTS LARGERTHAN 1" TO 24" BELOW GRADE. ITY OF COLTON TO REMOVE LIGHTING PRIOR TO TREE REMOVAL. 8 REMOVE PLANTS AND SOIL TO 6" BELOW EXISTING GRADE. 9 REMOVE GRAVEL.10REMOVE BENT COMMUNICATION BOX STEEL LID AND CONCRETE FRAME.11REMOVE SALVAGE LIGHT FIXTURE. DELIVER TO CITY OF COLTON FOR REUSE.12REMOVE CONCRETE STEP.13REMOVE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE.14REMOVE PIPE BOLLARDS.15REMOVE METAL ENCLOSURE.EXISTING TO REMAIN:E1EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE. SAWCUT AT EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMOVE.E2EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E3EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E4EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX TO REMAIN, RAISE BOX TO NEW FINISH SURFACE.E5EXISTING WATER METER ENCLOSURE TO REMAIN, RAISE BOX TO NEW FINISH SURFACE.E6EXISTING COLUMN AND SOLID ROOF OVERHEAD TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E7EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER AND CABINET TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E8EXISTING MANHOLE TO REMAIN. RAISE MANHOLE TO NEW FINISH SURFACE.E9EXISTING IRRIGATION VALVE BOX TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.E10EXISTING FIRE POST INDICATOR VALVE TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.E11EXISTING CONCRETE CURB TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.E12EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING LOT TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.E13EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
NORTH 7TH STREET

SHEET KEY
SEE SHEETS L-1.1,L-2.1, L-3.1, L-4.1SEE SHEETS L-1.2,L-2.2, L-3.2, L-4.2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-1.1
1 1
1 11
2 22
1 2
E6 E6 E6
4 4444
E6
E6
33 33
3 6
5 5
5 5 3E2
7 5
4 4
E3
E3
1111 E4
E4 E4
E4 E4
E5
E4
E8
L-1.2
SAWCUT
E12 14
E4
E5
E3
E5E10
E9 13
EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX NOTE:1. IF THE EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX IS BROKEN OR UNSALVAGEABLEPRIOR TO DEMOLITION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE THEBOX ONLY WITH APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF COLTON.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY OF EXISTING UTILITY BOXES ARECONNECTED AND REQUIRED, CALL OUT DIGALERT TO LOCATION UTILITY RUNS.IF UTILITY HAS BEEN ABANDONED THE CONCRETE BOX SHALL BE REMOVEDDURING DEMOLITION.

SALVAGE NOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH OWNER OR OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVEREGARDING REMOVAL, STORAGE, AND RELOCATION OF ALL ITEMS INDICATEDFOR SALVAGE. 6 SAWCUT
SAWCUT
E1
SAWCUT
E6 E6 E6 E6 E6E6
2 2 2 2 2 5
E4
PHASE 1
PHASE 1
PHASE 1
PHASE 1
PHASE 1
E1SAWCUTSAWCUT

5.b
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
NORTH 7TH STREET
PUMP
C
GRADING LEGEND:GRADING CALLOUTS: PROPOSED GRADE BREAK. FLOW DIRECTION / SLOPE DIRECTION w/ PERCENTAGE.EXISTING GRADE.PROPOSED FINISH GRADE PLUS 900.00.EXISTING GRADE PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS.

EQUIPMENT LEGEND:SYMBOLMANUF.MODELDESCRIPTIONNDS #75 NDS 4" ATRIUM GRATE DRAIN CONNECT TO 4" DRAIN PIPE. INSTALL PER DETAIL G,SHEET L-3.3.BROOKS#2424INSTALL NEW 24" SQ. GALVANIZED STEEL GRATETRAFFIC AT EXISTING CONCRETE BOX. ADJUST EXISTING CONCRETE BOX TO NEW F.G..SEE DETAIL A, SHEET L-3.4.NDS #864 GMTLNDS PRO SERIES DRAIN KIT WITH TWO 20" LONGGALV. STEEL CHANNEL GRATES PER SECTION.SEE DETAIL B, SHEET L-3.4.BROOKS#1212CB12" x 12" CONCRETE CATCH BASIN WITH WITH #1212 STEEL TRAFFIC GRATE. INSTALLPER DETAIL.BROOKS2424INSTALL NEW 24" SQ. GALV. STEEL TRAFFIC COVERCOVER AT EXISTING CONCRETE BOX. ADJUST BOX TO F.S. ELEVATIONEXISTING DRAIN PIPE TO REMAIN.PROPOSED PVC DRAIN PIPE, SDR 13.5. SIZE PER PLAN. 1 2
3 4
5 PASEO IMPROVEMENT PLANSCITY OF COLTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Richard Krumwiede: CA Lic. # 2834,AZ LIC. # 29115, NV LIC. # 446 10221-A TRADEMARK ST., RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 91730 PH: (909) 484-2800 PROJECT MANAGER: ROBERT COLLINGSEMAIL: [email protected]: (909) 484-2800 EXT. 1007 12-03-21
0SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4'8' 16' 32'PLAN CROSS REFERENCES:FOR NOTES AND LEGENDS, SEE THIS SHEETFOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, SEE SHEETS L-3.3 TO L-3.7FOR CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS, SEE BOOK SPECIFICATIONSFOR CORRESPONDING DEMOLITION PLAN SEE SHEET L-1.1FOR CORRESPONDING CONSTRUCTION PLAN SEE SHEET L-3.1FOR CORRESPONDING IRRIGATION PLAN SEE SHEET L-4.1FOR CORRESPONDING PLANTING PLAN SEE SHEET L-5.1 NORTH

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
NORTH 7TH STREET

SHEET KEY
SEE SHEETS L-1.1,L-2.1, L-3.1, L-4.1SEE SHEETS L-1.2,L-2.2, L-3.2, L-4.2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-2.2
GRADING NOTES:1.ALL GRADING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF WHICH CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING IS BEING PREFORMED GRADINGCODE AND ANY SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRADING PERMIT.2.SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 2' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL (2:1) AND SHALL HAVE NOT LESS THAN 90% COMPACTIONOUT TO THEIR FINISH SURFACES.3.ALL DRAIN LINES SHALL BE A MINIMUM 3" DIAMETER, AND HAVE A 1% MINIMUM FALL. DRAIN LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHCLEAN-OUTS EVERY 100 FT. PER CODE. CORE CURBS 1/2" DIAMETER LARGER THAN PIPE O.D.4.ALL CATCH BASINS AND DRAINS SHALL BE AS NOTED AND SET FLUSH WITH PROPOSED FINISH SURFACE OR PROPOSED FINISHGRADES, AND SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AT COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION.5.DRAIN LINE LAYOUT IS DIAGRAMMATIC.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE DRAIN LINE LOCATIONS SO AS NOT TO CONFLICT WITH TREE INSTALLATIONS.7.ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES WITH A 1% MINIMUM FALL. PLANTED AREAS SHALL HAVEA MINIMUM 2% FALL.8.FINISH GRADE SHALL BE ONE INCH BELOW FINISH SURFACE OF SIDEWALKS, CURBS, OR PAVED AREAS (UNLESS SHOWNOTHERWISE)9.FINISH GRADE SHALL HAVE A UNIFORM SURFACE, FREE FROM ALL DEPRESSIONS AND ALL OBJECTS THAT MAY BE A HINDRANCE TOCONSTRUCTION, PLANTING OR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS.10.ALL AREAS ARE TO BE FREE OF ROCK, DEBRIS, ETC. ALL EXISTING VEGETATIVE GROWTH OF WEEDS SHALL BE REMOVED.11.INSTALL ALL STEPS WITH A MINIMUM 1% WASH. CONTRACTOR MAY SLOPE PAVING AWAY FROM TOP AND BOTTOM RISERS ASNECESSARY AT MAXIMUM 3%, MINIMUM 1% FALL.12.DIRT AND DEBRIS TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM STREETS ON DAILY BASIS AND AT COMPLETION OFCONSTRUCTION.

GRADING ABBREVIATIONS:A.D. AREA DRAINO.C. ON CENTERB.S. BOTTOM OF STEPP.A. PLANTING AREAB.W.BACK OF WALKR. RADIUSC.L. CENTER LINESQ. SQUAREE.J. EXPANSION JOINTT.C. TOP OF CURBEQ. EQUALT.G. TOP OF GRATE/ CATCH BASINF.F. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONT.G.R.TOP OF GUARDRAIL/ HANDRAILF.H. FINISHED GRADET.F. TOP OF FENCEF.L. FLOW LINET.O.C.TOP OF COPINGF.S. FINISHED SURFACET.O.F.TOP OF FOOTINGG.B. GRADE BREAKT.P. TOP OF PILASTERH.P HIGH POINTT.S. TOP OF STEPH.P.S.HIGH POINT IN SWALET.W.TOP OF WALLINV. INVERTTYP.TYPICALN.I.C.NOT IN CONTRACT

81.19 TC80.69 AC

81.13 TC80.63 AC JOIN

79.38 FSJOIN

79.62 FSJOIN

79.54 FS

79.75 FS

79.83 FS

79.74 FS

80.50 TS80.00 BS

79.95 FSJOIN80.06 FSJOIN

80.91 TS80.08 BS

80.92 TS80.42 BS 80.54 FS

80.40 FS

80.46 FS

80.94 FF80.96 FF80.95 FF
(2) STEPS@5"

79.98 FS79.88 FS79.94 FS
JOIN

79.82 TG

79.82TG78.36 INV

80.57 FF80.60 FF

80.03 BS80.53 TS80.54 TS80.04 BS

80.57 FF80.59 FF

79.72 FS79.83 FS79.83 FS79.93 FS 79.96 FS79.88 FS79.80 FS 80.20 FS80.30 FS

80.64 FS

79.89 FSJOIN

79.84 FSJOIN
JOIN

1.5% 2.0%

1.6%

1.0%PAPAPA PA PA PA PA
XX%XX%XX.XX TSXX.XX BSXX.XX TSXX.XX BS

80.40 TG79.52 INV1
4"PVCS=0.01

80.00 TG79.13 INV
177.85 INV77.67 INV

77.27 INV
5 75.67 INVEX. OUT
4"PVCS=0.02

80.18 FS
4"PVCS=0.104"PVCS=0.0278.27 INV

79.70 TG78.77 INV1
3 4"PVCS=0.02
179.70 TG78.90 INV77.80 INV4"PVCS=0.02

79.60 TG78.67 INV179.40 TG78.52 INV1

79.00 INV

74.56 INVEX. OUT

77.52 INV77.58 INV

77.12 INV
5 4"PVCS=0.104"PVC

JOINJOIN JOINJOIN
S=0.06
1XX.XX_TS1XX.XX_BS

80.23 TC
JOIN
PA
PLANTER NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE 3" OF SOIL TO ALLOW FOR PASSIVE PERCOLATION.CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN AROUND EXISTING PALM NOT TO DISTURB ROOTS..

PLANTER NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE 3" OF SOIL TOALLOW FOR PASSIVE PERCOLATION.

PA PA PA PA PA
PA
PA
EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX NOTE:THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITYBOXES TO MEET THE NEW HARDSCAPE FINISH GRADES. IF THEEXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX IS BROKEN OR UNSALVAGEABLEPRIOR TO DEMOLITION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE THEBOX ONLY WITH APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF COLTON.

PHASE 1PHASE 2
PHASE 1
PHASE 2

80.60 FSJOIN80.69 FSJOIN
PHASE 1PHASE 2
PHASE 2
PHASE 2
PHASE 2
NOTE:SHADE STRUCTURE PER CONSTRUCTIONDRAWING SHEET L-3.1.

80.90 TS80.40 BS80.92 TS80.02 BS

80.50 TS80.00 BS 1% 1%1%
1%

5.b
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
PUMP
C
GRADING LEGEND:GRADING CALLOUTS: PROPOSED GRADE BREAK. FLOW DIRECTION / SLOPE DIRECTION w/ PERCENTAGE.EXISTING GRADE.PROPOSED FINISH GRADE PLUS 900.00.EXISTING GRADE PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS.

EQUIPMENT LEGEND:SYMBOLMANUF.MODELDESCRIPTIONNDS#75 NDS 4" ATRIUM GRATE DRAIN CONNECT TO 4" DRAIN PIPE. INSTALL PER DETAIL G,SHEET L-3.3.BROOKS#2424INSTALL NEW 24" SQ. GALVANIZED STEEL GRATETRAFFIC AT EXISTING CONCRETE BOX. ADJUST EXISTING CONCRETE BOX TO NEW F.G..SEE DETAIL A, SHEET L-3.4.NDS#864 GMTLNDS PRO SERIES DRAIN KIT WITH TWO 20" LONGGALV. STEEL CHANNEL GRATES PER SECTION.SEE DETAIL B, SHEET L-3.4.BROOKS#1212CB12" x 12" CONCRETE CATCH BASIN WITH WITH #1212 STEEL TRAFFIC GRATE. INSTALLPER DETAIL.BROOKS2424INSTALL NEW 24" SQ. GALV. STEEL TRAFFIC COVERCOVER AT EXISTING CONCRETE BOX. ADJUST BOX TO F.S. ELEVATIONEXISTING DRAIN PIPE TO REMAIN.PROPOSED PVC DRAIN PIPE, SDR 13.5. SIZE PER PLAN. 1 2
3 4
5 PASEO IMPROVEMENT PLANSCITY OF COLTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Richard Krumwiede: CA Lic. # 2834,AZ LIC. # 29115, NV LIC. # 446 10221-A TRADEMARK ST., RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 91730 PH: (909) 484-2800 PROJECT MANAGER: ROBERT COLLINGSEMAIL: [email protected]: (909) 484-2800 EXT. 1007 12-03-21
0SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4'8' 16' 32'
PLAN CROSS REFERENCES:FOR NOTES AND LEGENDS, SEE THIS SHEETFOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, SEE SHEET L-3.3 TO L-3.7FOR CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS, SEE BOOK SPECIFICATIONSFOR CORRESPONDING DEMOLITION PLAN SEE SHEET L-1.2FOR CORRESPONDING CONSTRUCTION PLAN SEE SHEET L-3.2FOR CORRESPONDING IRRIGATION PLAN SEE SHEET L-4.2FOR CORRESPONDING PLANTING PLAN SEE SHEET L-5.2NORTH

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
NORTH 7TH STREET

SHEET KEY
SEE SHEETS L-1.1,L-2.1, L-3.1, L-4.1SEE SHEETS L-1.2,L-2.2, L-3.2, L-4.2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-2.1
GRADING NOTES:1.ALL GRADING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF WHICH CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING IS BEING PREFORMED GRADINGCODE AND ANY SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRADING PERMIT.2.SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 2' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL (2:1) AND SHALL HAVE NOT LESS THAN 90% COMPACTIONOUT TO THEIR FINISH SURFACES.3.ALL DRAIN LINES SHALL BE A MINIMUM 3" DIAMETER, AND HAVE A 1% MINIMUM FALL. DRAIN LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHCLEAN-OUTS EVERY 100 FT. PER CODE. CORE CURBS 1/2" DIAMETER LARGER THAN PIPE O.D.4.ALL CATCH BASINS AND DRAINS SHALL BE AS NOTED AND SET FLUSH WITH PROPOSED FINISH SURFACE OR PROPOSED FINISHGRADES, AND SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AT COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION.5.DRAIN LINE LAYOUT IS DIAGRAMMATIC.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE DRAIN LINE LOCATIONS SO AS NOT TO CONFLICT WITH TREE INSTALLATIONS.7.ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES WITH A 1% MINIMUM FALL. PLANTED AREAS SHALL HAVEA MINIMUM 2% FALL.8.FINISH GRADE SHALL BE ONE INCH BELOW FINISH SURFACE OF SIDEWALKS, CURBS, OR PAVED AREAS (UNLESS SHOWNOTHERWISE)9.FINISH GRADE SHALL HAVE A UNIFORM SURFACE, FREE FROM ALL DEPRESSIONS AND ALL OBJECTS THAT MAY BE A HINDRANCE TOCONSTRUCTION, PLANTING OR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS.10.ALL AREAS ARE TO BE FREE OF ROCK, DEBRIS, ETC. ALL EXISTING VEGETATIVE GROWTH OF WEEDS SHALL BE REMOVED.11.INSTALL ALL STEPS WITH A MINIMUM 1% WASH. CONTRACTOR MAY SLOPE PAVING AWAY FROM TOP AND BOTTOM RISERS ASNECESSARY AT MAXIMUM 3%, MINIMUM 1% FALL.12.DIRT AND DEBRIS TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM STREETS ON DAILY BASIS AND AT COMPLETION OFCONSTRUCTION.

81.45 FS81.40 FS81.45 FS81.40 FS

81.60 FS
JOIN FLUSH @ DOOR81.45 FS81.40 FS

81.17 FS

81.01 TS

81.35 FS

80.75 FS

80.85 FS

81.30 TS80.75 BS81.30 TS80.80 BS

80.80 FS

81.30 TS

81.35 FS81.35 FS

81.30 TS

80.55 FS

80.80 BS

80.80 BS80.75 FS80.85 FS

80.85 FS

80.85 FS80.90 FS

80.90 FS

80.85 FS

80.85 TCJOIN80.75 FS

80.75 FS

80.70 FS

80.81 FS80.81 FS

80.72 FS

80.81 FS

81.19 TC80.79 AC

81.53 AC

80.30 TG79.50INV 80.30 TS79.30 BS

81.13 TC

81.19 TC80.69 AC
1%

1.5 %
1%
1%1%
2% MAX 1%2%
4"PVC4"PVC4"PVC4"PVC
4"PVC
4"PVC
4"PVC
4"PVC XX%XX%XX.XX TSXX.XX BSXX.XX TSXX.XX BS79.32 INV
1 78.78 INV
2 78.10 INV

77.80 INV76.97 EX OUT
5 1

79.18 INV
S=0.024"PVCS=0.02

80.77 FSJOIN FLUSH @ DOOR80.85 FS

80.85 FS

76.32 EX. OUT

80.59 TG
EX. CBTO REMAIN
S=0.02

80.50 TG79.50 INV

81.30 FS
PLANTER NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE 3" OF SOIL TOALLOW FOR PASSIVE PERCOLATION.(TYPICAL OF THE 4 ARCHED PLANTERS)

PAPAPAPA
PA
PA
EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX NOTE:THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITYBOXES TO MEET THE NEW HARDSCAPE FINISH GRADES. IF THEEXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX IS BROKEN OR UNSALVAGEABLEPRIOR TO DEMOLITION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE THEBOX ONLY WITH APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF COLTON. 4"PVCS=0.01
PHASE 1
PHASE 1
PHASE 1PHASE 1
PHASE 1
PHASE 1
PA (81.33 FS)JOIN
(81.17 FS)JOIN
(81.01 FS)JOIN
(80.90 FS)JOIN
(80.88 FS)JOIN
(80.84 FS)
(80.98 FS)
(80.94 FS) (80.87 FS)

80.75 FS
JOIN
(80.83 FS) (80.81 FS)
(80.68 FS)
(80.81 FS)

(80.75 TC)(80.75 AC)
JOIN
JOIN

80.50 TS79.50 BS
1 81.30 TS80.85 BS
1% 4"PVC80.85 FS

80.84 FS
4"PVC4"PVC 2%
EX. CONC.

80.75 FS

81.42 FS

80.70 FS

80.75 FS81.00 FS
2%2%

81.15 FS
EX. CONC.

78.36 INV
4"PVC

80.66 TG79.65 INV
4"PVCS=0.02
1%

80.65 TG79.65 INV
4"PVC

80.75 FS80.70 FS

78.68 INV

80.75 FS
1%

80.83 FS

76.45 EX. FS80.70 FS

80.75 FS

80.85 H.P.

80.72 FS

80.70 FS

80.68 FS

80.66 TG

80.85 FS80.81 FS80.74 FS
1%

80.71 FS
1%
1%
1%

80.85 FS
1%

80.77 FS
1 4"PVC
44 2
3"PVC
3"PVC

5.b
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
NORTH 7TH STREET
PUMP
C
FINISH, MATERIAL, AND AMENITIES SCHEDULE:KEY:MATERIAL / AMENITY:SYMBOL /HATCH:COLOR:FINISH: COMMENTS / REFERENCE:

A 4" MIN. THICK CONCRETEWITH SAW CUT JOINTSNATURAL GRAYMEDIUM BROOM FINISH WITHSAWCUT CONTROL JOINTS AT5'-0" SQ CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 2'X2' SQUARESAMPLES FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALL.

B12" WIDE CONCRETE BANDNATURAL GRAYMEDIUM BROOM FINISH w/ SAWCUT CONTROL JOINTS @ 5'-0"CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 2'X2' SQUARESAMPLES FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALL.

CMODULINE SERIES PRECASTCONCRETE PAVERS 3"X12"w/ POLYMERIC SAND INFILL3-COLORS: LINEN,CADO, RUSTSTANDARD FINISH; 80MM. CITYTO PROVIDE FINAL COLORAPPROVAL. APPLY NATURALMATTE SEALER - TECHNISEAL.

AVAILABLE FROM BELGARD PAVERS. CONTACTAURELIO BARRETO AT (714) 623-8464 DBID ALTERNATE NO. 1SHADE SAIL WITHDUALSHADE 350POSTS: TELE-GRAYSAIL: GOLD RUSH(2) SINGLE POST CUSTOMARBOR WEST ENDAVAILABLE FROM USA SHADE. CONTACT DEVINCHRISTENSEN AT PH. (949)-929-8173 ELIGHT POST--- --- SEE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER'S PLANS, SHEETE-1.0F 4" MIN. THICK CONCRETEWITH SAW CUT JOINTSNATURAL GRAYMEDIUM BROOM FINISHSAWCUT CONTROL JOINTS @30" SQ, TURNED 45°CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 2'X2' SQUARESAMPLES FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALL.

GAMERISTAR WIREWORKSPLUS ARCHITECTURALWELDED WIRE FENCINGPERMACOAT BLACK--- AVAILABLE FROM AMERISTAR, TEL., 888-333-3422 H6" MIN. THICK CONCRETEWITH SAW CUT JOINTSNATURAL GRAYLIGHT BROOM FINISH ATTRASH ENCLOSURE ONLYCONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 2'x2' SQUARESAMPLES FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALL I ALTERNATIVE NO. 2TRASH RECEPTACLE -CALIFORNIA ROUNDMODEL # QRCAL2832WD24 SHAW AND SONSCOLOR, BG1SMOOTHAVAILABLE FROM QCP PRECAST CONCRETE.CONTACT BRIAN GOTZ. PH: (866) 703-3434.QUOTE #0146744.

J ALTERNATIVE NO. 4TOURNESOL "WILSHIRE"GFRC PLANTER w/SITEWORKS "VERTIGREEN"3D TRELLIS,#WCX6-961836-90 "SIERRA"TIER ONE - SANDBLAST96" x 18" x 30" PLANTER AND TRELLIS AVAILABLEFROM TOURNESOL, TEL., 800-542-2282 K ALTERNATIVE NO. 3 - 28"DIA. GRANITE SPHEREFOUNTAIN WITH BASIN -BELOW GRADE EQUIPMENTVAULT.

SPHERE : MULTI REDGRANITE. BASE:BLACK GRANITEPOLISHED GRANITE SPHEREAND CELESTIAL BASEINCLUDING VARIABLE SPEEDPUMP, FILTER, ANDCHLORINATOR.

AVAILABLE FROM TOP STONE - EXCLUSIVEROLLING SPHERES. CONTACT BOB GENDLER AT800-476-3356 TOP STONE TO PROVIDE SHOPDRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL AND INSTALLATION.

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND:CONSTRUCTION CALLOUTS: 1 INSTALL CONCRETE PAVING. 4" THICK CONCRETE AT WALK, REFER TO CIVILENGINEER'S PLANS FOR THICKNESS AT VEHICULAR AREAS. SEE DETAIL A,SHEET L-3.3. 2 INSTALL CONCRETE BAND. SEE DETAIL A, SHEET L-3.3. 3 INSTALL FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINTS. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET L-3.3. 4 INSTALL CONCRETE CONTROL JOINTS AS SHOWN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET L-3.3. 5 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE STEP AND WARNING GROOVES. SEE DETAILS D AND E,SHEET L-3.3. 6 INSTALL PRECAST CONCRETE PAVERS. SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-3.3. 7 BID ALTERNATE NO. 1INSTALL SHADE SAIL WITH FREESTANDING SUPPORT POSTS. SEE DETAIL A, SHEETL-3.6. 8 INSTALL POST LIGHT. SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS. 9 PROVIDE AND REPLACE GALVANIZED STEEL COVER FOR EXISTING CONCRETEVAULT TO REMAIN.10INSTALL 6" WIDE CONCRETE CURB. SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-3.4.11INSTALL ASPHALT CONCRETE SLOT PATCH. SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-3.4.12CONSTRUCT TUBULAR STEEL HANDRAIL AT STEPS. SEE DETAIL A, SHEET L-3.5.13CONSTRUCT 12'-0" WIDE x 6'-0" HIGH ARCHITECTURAL WIRE DOUBLE GATE. SEEDETAIL G, SHEET L-3.4.14PROVIDE AND INSTALL 6' TALL ARCHITECTURAL WIRE FENCING. SEE DETAIL D,SHEET L-3.4.15 CONSTRUCT 6'-6" WIDE x 6'-0" HIGH ARCHITECTURAL WIRE DOUBLE GATE. SEEDETAIL F, SHEET L-3.4.16CONSTRUCT 3'-6" WIDE x 6'-0" HIGH ARCHITECTURAL WIRE SINGLE GATE. SEEDETAIL E, SHEET L-3.4. 17ALTERNATIVE NO. 2INSTALL PRECAST CONCRETE TRASH RECEPTACLE.18ALTERNATIVE NO. 3INSTALL GRANITE SPHERE FOUNTAIN WITH BASIN PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. LOCATE FOUNTAIN PUMP VAULT IN ADJACENT PLANTING AREA ASSHOWN, AND PROVIDE WATER SUPPLY LINE PER IRRIGATION PLAN.19ALTERNATIVE NO. 4INSTALL VERTICAL TRELLIS SYSTEM IN PLANTER BOX. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET L-3.5.

EXISTING REFERENCES:E1UTILITY / UTILITY VAULT TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E2TUBULAR STEEL FENCE AND GATE TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E3CONCRETE CURB TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E4EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E5EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E6EXISTING WALKWAY TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE.E7EXISTING AC PAVING AREA TO REMAIN PROTECT IN PLACE.E8EXISTING CONCRETE WHEEL STOP TO REMAIN IN PLACE.E9EXISTING UTILITY BOX TO REMAIN, FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND USE IN THEFIELD. IF BOX IS IN USE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST OR ROTATE UTILITY BOX90 DEGREES TO RELOCATE BOX OUT OF CONCRETE BAND OR STEP AS NEEDED, OROTHERWISE RELOCATE CLEAR OF NEW CONSTRUCTION FEATURE.E10EXISTING BUILDING OVERHEAD AND COLUMNS TO REMAIN. PROTECT FROMDAMAGE.E11EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING TO REMAIN. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE.

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
NORTH 7TH STREET

SHEET KEY
SEE SHEETS L-1.1,L-2.1, L-3.1, L-4.1SEE SHEETS L-1.2,L-2.2, L-3.2, L-4.2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-2.2
ALIGN12"
12"
ALIGN
12"3'-6"5'-1"5'-3"4'-8"2'-9"3'-6"5'-4"5'-6"6'-2"5'-0" 14'-7"

LCDOOR(TYP)
12"
12"PAPAPAPAPAPA

PA PA PA PA PA PA
PAPA
PA
2'-7"
12"
PA
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:1.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION AS DESIGNED WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONSAND/OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN KNOWN DURING DESIGN. SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELYBROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALLNECESSARY REVISIONS DUE TO A FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATION.2.WALL AND FENCE LAYOUT SHALL CONFORM TO PROPERTY LINE AND TOP OF SLOPE CONDITIONS. STAKING FOR LOCATION OF WALLS ANDFENCES SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CIVIL ENGINEER PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OF FOOTINGS.3.ALL FORMS AND ALIGNMENTS OF PAVING, WALL / FENCE LAYOUT, AND SPECIAL PAVING AREAS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THEOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO POURING (GIVE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE).4.FOR SITE GRADING, SEE CIVIL ENGINEER'S GRADING PLAN.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIMSELF FAMILIAR WITH ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PIPES AND STRUCTURES.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR COST INCURRED DUE TO DAMAGE AND REPLACEMENT OF SAID UTILITIES.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE IRRIGATION SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER PAVED AREAS AS REQUIRED. REFER TO IRRIGATION PLANS.7.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY COORDINATION WITH OTHER SUBCONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISHCONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AS SHOWN.8.PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUFFICIENTLY COMPACT THE SUB-GRADE AND PROVIDE SUBSURFACEPREPARATION PER SPECIFICATIONS.9.CONCRETE SURFACES SHALL BE FORMED WITH LONG, SMOOTH GRADIENT TO REDUCE DIPS, ABRUPT CHANGES AND SHARP TRANSITIONS.10.ALL CURVILINEAR WALKS, CURBS, HEADER BOARDS, AND WALLS SHALL HAVE A CONTINUOUS SMOOTH CURVE WHERE APPLICABLE. ALLFORMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO BEGINNING THAT PHASE OF WORK.

NOTE:FOR MORE INFORMATION ON ITEMS TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED, SEEDEMOLITION PLANS, SHEETS L1.1 AND L1.2 8E
9 6C
1A 5E1
1110 8E10
E5E4
1110
103495
E1
E22B1A
512
12 5E18E
10E1E5E8E7
E3E4
5 E110
10 1A11
9 2B1A
43 22E1
1A
E9
EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX NOTE:1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITYBOXES TO MEET THE NEW HARDSCAPE FINISH GRADES.2. IF THE EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX IS BROKEN OR UNSALVAGEABLEPRIOR TO DEMOLITION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE THEBOX ONLY WITH APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF COLTON.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY OF EXISTING UTILITY BOXES ARECONNECTED AND REQUIRED, CALL OUT DIGALERT TO LOCATION UTILITY RUNS.IF UTILITY HAS BEEN ABANDONED THE CONCRETE BOX SHALL BE REMOVEDDURING DEMOLITION.

E1
PHASE 1
E12B 13G14G
14G
14G
E5E3 E5 E5 E5 E5 E5
14G
14G
14G
14G
PHASE 2PHASE 1 PHASE 2
E3
E3
PHASE 1PHASE 2
PHASE 2
PHASE 2 PHASE 2
PHASE 2
7D
12" 12" 12"
16G
13G
8E
2B
6'-2"
7'-9"
8'-0"
7'-2"
6'-6"
6'-5"
6'-10"
7'-11"
8'-9"
8'-10"
7'-11"
6'-4"
5'-10"
6'-11"
7'-8"
6'-8"
10'-0" TYP
3 PAPA

5.b
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
PUMP
C
CONSTRUCTION LEGEND:CONSTRUCTION CALLOUTS: 1 INSTALL CONCRETE PAVING. 4" THICK CONCRETE AT WALK, REFER TO CIVILENGINEER'S PLANS FOR THICKNESS AT VEHICULAR AREAS. SEE DETAIL A,SHEET L-3.3. 2 INSTALL CONCRETE BAND. SEE DETAIL A, SHEET L-3.3. 3 INSTALL FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINTS. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET L-3.3. 4 INSTALL CONCRETE CONTROL JOINTS AS SHOWN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET L-3.3. 5 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE STEP AND WARNING GROOVES. SEE DETAILS D AND E,SHEET L-3.3. 6 INSTALL PRECAST CONCRETE PAVERS. SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-3.3. 7 BID ALTERNATE NO. 1INSTALL SHADE SAIL WITH FREESTANDING SUPPORT POSTS. SEE DETAIL A, SHEETL-3.6. 8 INSTALL POST LIGHT. SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS. 9 PROVIDE AND REPLACE GALVANIZED STEEL COVER FOR EXISTING CONCRETEVAULT TO REMAIN.10INSTALL 6" WIDE CONCRETE CURB. SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-3.4.11INSTALL ASPHALT CONCRETE SLOT PATCH. SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-3.4.12CONSTRUCT TUBULAR STEEL HANDRAIL AT STEPS. SEE DETAIL A, SHEET L-3.5.13CONSTRUCT 12'-0" WIDE x 6'-0" HIGH ARCHITECTURAL WIRE DOUBLE GATE. SEEDETAIL G, SHEET L-3.4.14PROVIDE AND INSTALL 6' TALL ARCHITECTURAL WIRE FENCING. SEE DETAIL D,SHEET L-3.4.15 CONSTRUCT 6'-6" WIDE x 6'-0" HIGH ARCHITECTURAL WIRE DOUBLE GATE. SEEDETAIL F, SHEET L-3.4.16CONSTRUCT 3'-6" WIDE x 6'-0" HIGH ARCHITECTURAL WIRE SINGLE GATE. SEEDETAIL E, SHEET L-3.4.17ALTERNATIVE NO. 2INSTALL PRECAST CONCRETE TRASH RECEPTACLE.18ALTERNATIVE NO. 3INSTALL GRANITE SPHERE FOUNTAIN WITH BASIN PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. LOCATE FOUNTAIN PUMP VAULT IN ADJACENT PLANTING AREA ASSHOWN, AND PROVIDE WATER SUPPLY LINE PER IRRIGATION PLAN.19ALTERNATIVE NO. 4INSTALL VERTICAL TRELLIS SYSTEM IN PLANTER BOX. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET L-3.5.

FINISH, MATERIAL, AND AMENITIES SCHEDULE:KEY:MATERIAL / AMENITY:SYMBOL /HATCH:COLOR:FINISH: COMMENTS / REFERENCE:

A 4" MIN. THICK CONCRETEWITH SAW CUT JOINTSNATURAL GRAYMEDIUM BROOM FINISH WITHSAWCUT CONTROL JOINTS AT5'-0" SQ CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 2'X2' SQUARESAMPLES FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALL.

B12" WIDE CONCRETE BANDNATURAL GRAYMEDIUM BROOM FINISH w/ SAWCUT CONTROL JOINTS @ 5'-0"CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 2'X2' SQUARESAMPLES FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALL.

CMODULINE SERIES PRECASTCONCRETE PAVERS 3"X12"w/ POLYMERIC SAND INFILL3-COLORS: LINEN,CADO, RUSTSTANDARD FINISH; 80MM. CITYTO PROVIDE FINAL COLORAPPROVAL. APPLY NATURALMATTE SEALER - TECHNISEAL.

SPHERE : MULTI REDGRANITE. BASE:BLACK GRANITEPOLISHED GRANITE SPHEREAND CELESTIAL BASEINCLUDING VARIABLE SPEEDPUMP, FILTER, ANDCHLORINATOR.

AVAILABLE FROM TOP STONE - EXCLUSIVEROLLING SPHERES. CONTACT BOB GENDLER AT800-476-3356 TOP STONE TO PROVIDE SHOPDRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL AND INSTALLATION. 0SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4'8' 16' 32'
PLAN CROSS REFERENCES:FOR NOTES AND LEGENDS, SEE THIS SHEET AND SHEET L 2.1FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, SEE SHEETS L-3.3 TO L-3.6FOR CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS, SEE BOOK SPECIFICATIONSFOR CORRESPONDING DEMOLITION PLAN SEE SHEET L-1.2FOR CORRESPONDING IRRIGATION PLAN SEE SHEET L-4.2FOR CORRESPONDING PLANTING PLAN SEE SHEET L-5.2NORTH

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
NORTH 7TH STREET

SHEET KEY
SEE SHEETS L-1.1,L-2.1, L-3.1, L-4.1SEE SHEETS L-1.2,L-2.2, L-3.2, L-4.2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-2.1
12"
12"
12"
ALIGN
ALIGN
12"
10'-1"
9'-0"
12"9'-0"
12"
8'-0"12"
ALIGNw/ F.O.B.
12"
12"
12"

PASEO IMPROVEMENT PLANSCITY OF COLTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Richard Krumwiede: CA Lic. # 2834,AZ LIC. # 29115, NV LIC. # 446 10221-A TRADEMARK ST., RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 91730 PH: (909) 484-2800 PROJECT MANAGER: ROBERT COLLINGSEMAIL: [email protected]: (909) 484-2800 EXT. 1007 12-03-21
NOTE:FOR MORE INFORMATION ON ITEMS TO REMAIN AND BEPROTECTED, SEE DEMOLITION PLANS, SHEETS L1.1 AND L1.2 PA PA
PA
PAPA
PA
PA
5'-11"
5'-2"
5'-11"
BL-3.4
E1
2B6C2B
5 2B52BE1
E1
101141A8E
9 11
E1
E1E1
1F
E9
E1
2B
11 6'-4"
14'-4"
12'-6"
9'-7"
9'-7"
12'-7"
15'-0"
14'-6"
11'-5"
9'-4"
10'-3"
18'-5"10'-0" TYP
12"
12"12"12"
4'-10"
10 12"
BL-3.4
BL-3.4
BL-3.4
E9
E9
E9
EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX NOTE:1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITYBOXES TO MEET THE NEW HARDSCAPE FINISH GRADES.2. IF THE EXISTING CONCRETE UTILITY BOX IS BROKEN OR UNSALVAGEABLEPRIOR TO DEMOLITION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE THEBOX ONLY WITH APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF COLTON.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY OF EXISTING UTILITY BOXES ARECONNECTED AND REQUIRED, CALL OUT DIGALERT TO LOCATION UTILITY RUNS.IF UTILITY HAS BEEN ABANDONED THE CONCRETE BOX SHALL BE REMOVEDDURING DEMOLITION. 6C
E114G15G14G2B
16G
13G 14G 2B
5 15G
15G

PA PAPAPA
1A3
4 1A 342B
BID ALTERNATE AREA:IF FOUNTAIN IS INSTALLED AS BID ALTERNATE,CONSTRUCT CONCRETE BAND AROUND PERIMETER.IF FOUNTAIN IS NOT INSTALLED AREA SHALL BECONTINUOUSLY PAVED TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVINGWITH SAWCUT JOINTS. 14G
12"
14G
14G
PA
8E
PHASE 1
PHASE 1 PHASE 1
PHASE 1
8E
E102B
17I
E10
12" E1 E10
2BE10
E1
PAR2'-3"
R2'-3"
1A
12"
13'-2"
13'-4"
10'-3"
8'-3"
8'-0"
9'-7"
9'-3"
10'-4"
E11E11 34
17I2B8E(TYP OF 4)17I
E918K18K17I
8E(TYP OF 4)

5.b
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

NOTES:A.CONTRACTOR SHALL POUR AND FINISHA 2'x2' SAMPLE OF EACH TYPE OFFINISH FOR APPROVAL BY OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE OR LANDSCAPEARCHITECT. 12 5
3 4
3 76 2
LEGEND:1.CONCRETE PAVING, COLOR AND FINISH PER CONSTRUCTIONPLAN. 1/2" RADIUS ALONG ALL EXPOSED EDGES. FOR BROOMFINISH, RUN BROOM PERPENDICULAR TO EDGE OF CONCRETE /PATH OF TRAVEL.2.CONCRETE BAND - FINISH AND WIDTH PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.3.1" DEEP CONTROL JOINT BETWEEN BAND AND FIELD.4.EDGE OF PAVING.5.SCORE JOINT PER PLAN.6.FINISH GRADE.7.COMPACTED SUBGRADE.

CONCRETE w/ JOINTSA1 CONCRETE w/ BANDA2
SECTIONA3 112" BAND
12" BAND
LEGEND:1.CONCRETE STEP PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.2.1/2" RADIUS AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES.3.6" MAX., 4" MIN STEP.4.1/2" THICK, FULL-DEPTH, DOWELED EXPANSION JOINT WITH WATERPROOFSEALANT.5.ADJACENT PAVING WITH 12" WIDE BAND PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.6.#3 REBAR 3" CLEAR OF ALL SURFACES.7.3" WIDE WARNING GROOVES. PLACE ON ALL TREAD AND APPLY 'AMSTEPPRODUCTS NON-SLIP EPOXY COATING' #AS-250, BLACK COLOR.8.90% MIN. COMPACTED SUB-GRADE.

CONCRETE STEP (SINGLE)DSCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 4"
3"
1"
4"
6"
1 3
2% MIN.
3"
6 7 24
5 85
12"12"
4 LEGEND:1.12" WIDE CONCRETE STEP w/ 1/2" RADIUSBULL-NOSE AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES. COLOR ANDFINISH PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.2.6" MAX., 4"MIN. RISER. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER'SGRADING PLAN.3.1/2" FULL-DEPTH WATERPROOF EXPANSION JOINT.4.ADJACENT CONCRETE PAVING PERCONSTRUCTION PLAN.5.#4 CONTINUOUS NOSING REBAR (3" CLR).6.COMPACTED SUB-GRADE.7.CONSTRUCT 3" WIDE x 1/4" DEEP WARNINGGROOVES. PLACE ON ALL TREADS AND APPLYCONCRETE STAIN TO GROOVE AREA ONLY.8.#4 REBAR AT 16" O.C. BOTH WAYS.9.EXTEND REBAR 12" INTO CONCRETE SLAB TOFORM CONNECTING DOWEL. SLEEVE ONE SIDE. 4 CONCRETE STEPS (2)ESCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
12" 12"
12"
3"
6" TYP6" TYP8"
3"3"3"1% MIN. SLOPE(TYP)
9 6
3 1
8 57
3 4
2 2
LEGEND:1.ADJACENT CONCRETE. MINIMUM 4" ALL SIDES.2.4.12" x 24" LONG CAST IRON WAVE CHANNEL GRATE,MODEL #253-C1. ATTACH WITH STAINLESS STEELSCREWS.3.4-3/4" x 3-3/4" x 10' SPEE-D CHANNEL DRAIN, MODEL#400-10.4.4" NDS CHANNEL COUPLING, MODEL #248.5.4" END CHANNEL CAP, MODEL #247.6.24" LONG CHANNEL DRAIN WITH 4" SCH 40 PVC OUTLET,MODEL #234.7.4" SCH 40 PVC ELL.8.CONNECTION TO 4" STORM DRAIN.9.4" SCH 40 PVC PIPE.10.(2) #4 REBAR, CONTINUOUS.11.#3 REBAR @ 18" O.C.12.DOWELED EXPANSION JOINT WITH WATERPROOFSEALANT. 4 3/4"
3 3/4"
5 3/4"
4"4"
SECTION: FRONTSECTION: SIDE
5 241
7 3
8 12
9 66
CHANNEL DRAINFSCALE: 3" = 1'-0"
12" BAND
121 123 1112 10
LEGEND:1.CONCRETE PAVING PER PLAN.2.HAND TOOLED JOINT, 1" DEEP w/ 1/4" TOOLED RADIUS.3.POLYURETHANE WATERPROOF SEALANT, COLOR TOMATCH PAVING. SUBMIT COLOR SAMPLES PRIOR TOINSTALLATION.4.1/2" EXPANSION JOINT w/ TEAR-AWAY TOP, SEESPECIFICATIONS.5.COMPACTED SUB-GRADE PER SOIL REPORT.6.MACHINE SAW CUT JOINT, 1" DEEP MINIMUM. 1 CONCRETE JOINTSBSCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
1" MIN.1/4"
1" MIN.1/4"
NOTES:A. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AMAXIMUM OF 20' APART UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN.B. PLACE EXPANSION JOINTS AT ALLABUTMENTS ADJACENT TO FOUNDATIONSAND SEGMENTED AREAS OF CONCRETEAND AS SHOWN ON PLAN. 324 61 5 21 5
EXPANSION JOINTB1WATERPROOFSAWCUT JOINTB2 CONTROL JOINTB3 5 1
ATRIUM GRATE AND DRAINGSCALE: 3" = 1'-0"
LEGEND:1.NDS GREEN PLASTIC ATRIUMGRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL, SIZEPER PLAN.2.FINISH GRADE, MINIMUM 2% SLOPETO DRAIN.3.NDS PLASTIC PIPE REDUCER SIZEAS NEEDED.4.4" PLASTIC DRAIN LINE.5.NDS PLASTIC 'LONG BEND' ELBOW,OR APPROVED EQUAL.6.PLASTIC DRAIN LINE LATERAL, SIZEPER PLAN, CONNECT TO MAINDRAIN LINE WITH WYE ADAPTER.7.INVERT VARIES PER GRADING PLAN.8.PLANTER BED SUB-GRADE. 2 3
4 5
6 78

5.b
Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

PASEO IMPROVEMENT PLANSCITY OF COLTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Richard Krumwiede: CA Lic. # 2834,AZ LIC. # 29115, NV LIC. # 446 10221-A TRADEMARK ST., RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 91730 PH: (909) 484-2800 PROJECT MANAGER: ROBERT COLLINGSEMAIL: [email protected]: (909) 484-2800 EXT. 1007 12-03-21
CONCRETE PLANTER RAISED CURBBSCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
LEGEND:1.POURED-IN-PLACE PLANTER CURBWITH SKATEBOARD DETERRENT.2.#4 REBAR, CONTINUOUS AT TOPAND BOTTOM.3.ADJACENT PAVING PERCONSTRUCTION PLAN.4.FINISH GRADE AT PLANTER.5.PLANTING BACKFILL PER PLANTINGPLAN.6.COMPACTED SUBGRADE.7.CONCRETE BAND WITH CHANNELDRAIN. 12"
3"3"CLR
18"
14 22
56 73
12"
3"3"CLR
18"
14 22
56 3
SECTIONB1@ BAND & DRAIN
SECTIONB2@ PAVERS
CONCRETE CURB & ASPHALT PATCHCSCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
8"
6"
6"18"
8"
6"
2"6"18"
CURB SECTIONC1@ ADJACENT PAVING
CURB SECTIONC2@ ADJACENT PLANTING2"6" 2"6"
LEGEND:1.CONCRETE CURB WITH 1/2"RADIUS ALONG EXPOSED EDGES.2.ADJACENT CONCRETE PAVINGPER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.3.1/2" THICK, FULL-DEPTHEXPANSION JOINT WITHWATERPROOF SEALANT.4.ASPHALT PATCH, 12" WIDE.CONFIRM DEPTH OF EXISTINGASPHALT IN FIELD AND MATCH.5.ROAD BASE. CONFIRM EXISTING INFIELD AND MATCH.6.EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING.7.EXISTING ROAD BASE MATERIAL.8.FINISH GRADE.9.SUBGRADE. 146
759
32 759
146
8 ARCHITECTURAL WIRE FENCEDSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 6'-0"
10" DIA.
36" MIN.2"
8'-0" MAX.

LEGEND:1.GALVANIZED STEEL TUBE FENCE POST, CAPPED. SIZE PERMANUFACTURER'S STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS.2.GALVANIZED STEEL MESH WITH ARCHITECTURAL "V" FOLDS.ZINC PHOSPHATE, POWDER, AND COLOR COATS PERMANUFACTURER.3.CONCRETE FOOTING. SIZE PER MANUFACTURERCALCULATIONS.4.ADJACENT CONCRETE PAVING PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.5.COMPACTED SUBGRADE. 12 224
53 ARCHITECTURAL WIRE GATE (SGL)ESCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
10 1/2"
36" 2" 6'-0"
3'-6" CLR2"
LEGEND:1.GALVANIZED STEEL TUBE GATE POST, CAPPED.SIZE PER MANUFACTURER'S STRUCTURALCALCULATIONS.2.2" SQ. TUBULAR STEEL GATE END, CAPPED.3.GALVANIZED STEEL MESH WITH ARCHITECTURAL"V" FOLDS. ZINC PHOSPHATE, POWDER, ANDCOLOR COATS PER MANUFACTURER.4.CONCRETE FOOTING. SIZE PER MANUFACTURERCALCULATIONS.5.ADJACENT CONCRETE PAVING PER CONSTRUCTIONPLAN.6.COMPACTED SUBGRADE.7.LOCKABLE GATE LATCH PER MANUFACTURER.8.HINGES (2) MIN. PER MANUFACTURER. 12 8 3
145
6 7
821
ARCHITECTURAL WIRE GATE (SGL)FSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
10 1/2"
36" 2" 6'-0"
6'-8"3'-3"2" 3'-3"0"2"
LEGEND:1.GALVANIZED STEEL TUBE GATE POST, CAPPED. SIZE PERMANUFACTURER'S STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS.2.2" SQ. TUBULAR STEEL GATE END, CAPPED.3.GALVANIZED STEEL MESH WITH ARCHITECTURAL "V" FOLDS.ZINC PHOSPHATE, POWDER, AND COLOR COATS PERMANUFACTURER.4.CONCRETE FOOTING. SIZE PER MANUFACTURERCALCULATIONS.5.ADJACENT CONCRETE PAVING PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.6.COMPACTED SUBGRADE.7.LOCKABLE GATE LATCH PER MANUFACTURER.8.HINGES (2) MIN. PER MANUFACTURER. 81 32
83 145
6 27
10 1/2"
36" 2"
5'-11" 2" 5'-11"2"
LEGEND:1.GALVANIZED STEEL TUBE GATE POST, CAPPED. SIZE PERMANUFACTURER'S STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS.2.2" SQ. TUBULAR STEEL GATE FRAME WITH CAPPED ENDVERTICALS.3.GALVANIZED STEEL MESH WITH ARCHITECTURAL "V" FOLDS.ZINC PHOSPHATE, POWDER, AND COLOR COATS PERMANUFACTURER.4.CONCRETE FOOTING. SIZE PER MANUFACTURERCALCULATIONS.5.ADJACENT CONCRETE PAVING PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.6.COMPACTED SUBGRADE.7.LOCKABLE GATE LATCH PER MANUFACTURER.8.HINGES (2) MIN. PER MANUFACTURER. 145
6 ARCHITECTURAL WIRE GATE - 12' DOUBLE-SWINGGSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2"
6'-0"
25 81
32 8
2 12'-0"
STEEL CATCH BASIN COVERASCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
LEGEND:1.EXISTING CONCRETE CATCH BASIN CLEAN-OUT.2.EXISTING DRAIN PIPE TO REMAIN.3.INSTALL NEW BROOKS 26" x 26" GALVANIZEDSTEEL COVER #2424. INSTALL PERMANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS.4.ADJACENT PAVERS AND BASE MATERIAL PERCONSTRUCTION PLAN.5.COMPACTED SUBGRADE. 24"26 1/4" 314
52 FLUSH (TYP)

5.b
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

PASEO IMPROVEMENT PLANSCITY OF COLTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Richard Krumwiede: CA Lic. # 2834,AZ LIC. # 29115, NV LIC. # 446 10221-A TRADEMARK ST., RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 91730 PH: (909) 484-2800 PROJECT MANAGER: ROBERT COLLINGSEMAIL: [email protected]: (909) 484-2800 EXT. 1007 12-03-21
TUBULAR STEEL HANDRAILASCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
LEGEND:1.CONCRETE STEPS PER CONSTRUCTIONPLAN.2.ADJACENT PAVING PER CONSTRUCTIONPLAN.3.1-1/2" DIA. TUBULAR GALV. STEELHANDRAIL AND POSTS.4.USE 90° ELBOWS WHERE BENDSOCCUR.5.CORE DRILL CONCRETE AND SETPOSTS WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT, TYP.NOTE:POWDER COAT STEEL POSTS AND RAILS,COLOR TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY OFCOLTON. 1 12" LEVEL
12" LEVELTREADWIDTH
R3"
R3"
36"
36"
6"
6"
3 3
2 135
2 4
4 ELEVATIONA2
PLANA1
---A2
3" 3"
PLANTER WITH VINE TRELLISBSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
LEGEND:1.96" x 18" x 36" PREFABRICATED PLANTER, MATERIALAND FINISH PER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALSSCHEDULE.2.SCREEN TRELLIS WITH BRACKET SUPPORTS. INSTALLOFFSET FROM PLANTER CENTER PERMANUFACTURER.3.ADJACENT PAVING PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.4.COMPACTED SUBGRADE.5.PROVIDE PVC DRAIN LINE WITH ADAPTOR TOPLANTER. CONNECT TO SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM PERGRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN.6.FILTER DRAIN MAT.7.POTTING SOIL MIX PER PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS. 4"PLANTERTRELLIS
LCLC
96"
18"4"
21 34
12 PLANB1
SECTIONB2
7 56
5 5.b
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

5.b
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
NORTH 7TH STREET
PUMP
CC
1 1/2"1" 1 1/2"3/4"
1"
3/4" 1 1/4"
IRRIGATION LEGEND:DRIP AND EMITTERS:SYMBOLMANUF.MODEL #DESCRIPTION GPMRADIUSPSI DETAIL REFERENCENETAFIMTLCV6-12INSTALL DRIPLINE 3" BELOW F.G., SPACE LINES 12" APART, 3" MAX.0.010DRIP30 SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-44FROM EDGES. SECURE TUBING w/ TIE DOWN STAKES @ 5'-0" O.C.RAINBIRD RWS-M-B-C-1401INSTALL (2) RWS BUBBLERS PER TREE. 0.50 BUB30 SEE DETAIL E, SHEET L-4.4RAINBIRD XB-10PCINSTALL (2) EMITTERS PER VINE0.017 (2)DRIP30 SEE DETAIL E, SHEET L-4.4.EQUIPMENT:SYMBOLMANUF.MODEL #DESCRIPTION DETAIL REFERENCEX --- --- EXISTING 1" WATER METER.FIELD VERIFY.NIBCOT-585 LINE SIZED BRONZE FULL PORT BALL VALVE IN VALVE BOX.SEE DETAIL B, SHEET L-4.3FEBCO825-YA1" REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE w/ ENCLOSURE.SEE DETAIL A, SHEET L-4.3RAINBIRDXCZ-100-PRB-COMPLASTIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH 1" PESB VALVE AND 1" SEE DETAIL F, SHEET L-4.3PRESSURE REGULATING (40 PSI), QUICK CHECK BASKET FILTER.RAINBIRD100-PESBPLASTIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE (FOR NON-DRIP CONDITIONS) SEE DETAIL G, SHEET L-4.3IN RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX.NETAFIMTLSOVMANUAL FLUSH VALVE WITH 24" BLANK TUBING EXTENSION AT LOWEST PART OF EACHSEE DETAIL D, SHEET L-4.4DRIPLINE PLANTER.X RAINBIRDMODEL: ESP-12-LXMEF120V 12 STATION CONTROLLER w/ FLOW SMART MODULE, IN METER ENCLOSURESEE DETAIL A, SHEET L-4.4.STAINLESS STEEL PEDESTAL ENCLOSURE.X SITEONE ---WIRELESS WEATHER SENSOR, INCLUDED WITH CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY.SEE DETAIL B, SHEET L-4.4.SUPERIOR 3200-1001" NORMALLY CLOSED MASTER VALVE, INCLUDED WITH CONTROLLER.SEE DETAIL E, SHEET L-4.3RAINBIRD33-DLRCINSTALL 3/4" QUICK COUPLER VALVE, IN 10" ROUND GREEN BOX; w/ 2 KEYS TOTAL.SEE DETAIL D, SHEET L-4.3CST 100-P 1" FLOW SENSOR INSTALL IN VALVE BOX.SEE DETAIL E, SHEET L-4.3APPROVEDSCH. 40 PVCPROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE MAINLINE AS SHOWN. MIN. 18" COVER, 24" SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-4.3COVER ACROSS VEHICULAR AREAS.APPROVEDSCH. 40 PVCLATERAL LINE SIZED AS SHOWN (MINIMUM OF 3/4"), MINIMUM COVER OF 12". SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-4.3APPROVED SCH. 40 PVCWIRE SLEEVE, SIZED AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-4.3APPROVED SCH. 40 PVCLATERAL SLEEVE, SIZED AS REQUIRED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L-4.3 M
CRMV
HYDROZONE LEGEND:HYDROZONE 1 (HZ1)LOW WATER USE SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER,USING SUBSURFACE DRIP LINE IRRIGATION w/ 12"SPACING.HYDROZONE 2 (HZ2)MODERATE WATER USE TREES USING RWSBUBBLER IRRIGATION.HYDROZONE 3 (HZ3)HIGH WATER USE WATER FEATURE USING AN AUTO-FILL SYSTEM.REFER TO WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS AND CONTROLLERCHARTS ON SHEETS L-4.3 - L-4.4 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.PLEASE ALSO REFER TO VALVE CALLOUT CHARTS ON THEIRRIGATION PLANS.

W
PIPE SIZING CHART:SCHEDULE 40 PVCA 3/4" 0-8 GPMB 1" 9-12 GPMC 1 1/4" 13-22 GPMD 1 1/2" 23-30 GPME 2" 31-50 GPMTHIS SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO USE WATER FROM A POTABLE WATER SOURCE 5 NETAFIM INSTALLATION NOTES:A. NETAFIM "TECHLINE CV" EMITTERS AND SPACING BETWEEN LINES AS PER IRRIGATION LEGEND.B. LOCATE NETAFIM FLUSH VALVE AT LOWEST POINTS OF EACH SEPARATE PLANTER AREA WITHINSYSTEM. INSTALL IN PLANTER AREA. SEE FLUSH VALVE DETAIL IN THIS PACKAGE FOR INSTALLATIONINSTRUCTIONS. (FOR NON-CV LINES AIR RELIEF VALVE WILL BE REQUIRED. IF NEEDED LOCATE AT ORNEAR HIGH POINT OF PLANTER AREA WITHIN SYSTEM). UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES TECHLINECV DOES NOT REQUIRE AIR RELIEF VALVES.C. CONNECT TECHLINE CV TO PVC WITH PVC TEES AND COMPRESSION FITTINGS. USE COMPRESSIONFITTINGS FOR ALL PVC TO TECHLINE CONNECTIONS. PRIME AND GLUE ALL PVC TO PVCCONNECTIONS.

IRRIGATION NOTE:IRRIGATION LATERALS, MAINLINES, AND EQUIPMENT ARE SHOWNSCHEMATICALLY FOR VISUAL CLARITY ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFYLOCATIONS IN PLANTER AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE.FLUSH VALVE NOTE:FLUSH VALVES TO BE INSTALLED AT FURTHEST AND LOWEST END OF EACHRUN OF DRIPLINE. FLUSH VALVES TO BE LOCATED WITHIN EACH PLANTERAREA OF DRIPLINE SYSTEM.

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
NORTH 7TH STREET

SHEET KEY
SEE SHEETS L-1.1,L-2.1, L-3.1, L-4.1SEE SHEETS L-1.2,L-2.2, L-3.2, L-4.2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-3.2
IRRIGATION NOTES:1.THIS SYSTEM IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL PIPE, VALVES, ETC. SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS AREFOR DESIGN CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTING AREAS WHEREVERPOSSIBLE.2.DO NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGSWHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS OR GRADE DIFFERENCESEXIST AND SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER’S AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE. IN THE EVENT THAT THIS NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THECONTRACTOR MUST ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR REVISIONS NECESSARY.3.SYSTEM DESIGN IS BASED ON MINIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE SHOWN AT EACH POINT OFCONNECTION WITH MAXIMUM GPM DEMAND SPECIFIED. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALLVERIFY ALL PRESSURES ON SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNICATE TO OWNER’SCONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVE.4.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITHALL GRADE DIFFERENCES, LOCATION OF WALLS, RETAINING WALLS, CURBS, ETC. HE SHALLCOORDINATE ALL HIS WORK WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OTHERSUB-CONTRACTORS FOR LOCATION OF PIPE SLEEVES THROUGH WALLS, UNDER ROADS,PAVING AND STRUCTURES.5.MAINLINE FEEDER BETWEEN POINT OF CONNECTION, METER, AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERTO BE OF MATERIAL REQUIRED BY CURRENT WATER DISTRICT.6.FINAL LOCATION OF THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE AND THE BACKFLOWPREVENTION DEVICE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY’S AND OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE,AND/OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, WHERE APPLICABLE.7.IN ADDITION TO THE SLEEVES SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALLBE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL SLEEVES OF SUFFICIENT SIZEUNDER ALL PAVED AREAS PRIOR TO PAVING UPON APPROVAL OF THE OWNER’SREPRESENTATIVE, IF REQUIRED TO OPERATE SYSTEMS.8.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUSH ALL LINES AND ADJUST ALL HEADS FOR MAXIMUMPERFORMANCE AND TO PREVENT OVERSPRAY ONTO WALKS, STREETS, AND BUILDINGS ASMUCH AS POSSIBLE. THIS SHALL INCLUDE SELECTING THE BEST NOZZLE RADIUS TO FITUNUSUAL SITE CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL PURPOSES AT NO EXTRA CHARGE. CALLLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR ANY COVERAGE TESTS.9.QUALITY CONTROL OBSERVATION SEQUENCES ARE FOUND IN THE SPECIFICATIONS.10.CLEAN-UP ON A DAILY BASIS PER OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE’S APPROVAL. 678
#
PHASE 2 IRRIGATION NOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE GATEVALVES AND STUB-OUT AT MAIN ANDLATERAL LINES FOR FUTURE IRRIGATIONOF PHASE 2 PLANTER AREAS.

PHASE 1PHASE 2
VALVE CALLOUT CHART:CONTROLLERTYPEPLANTSIZEGPMHZSF1 DRIPLINESHRUB1"4 1 4162 BUBBLERTREE1"2 2 1003 DRIPLINESHRUB1"1 1 284 WATER FEATURE--- 1"3 3 45 DRIPLINESHRUB1"7 1 6796 BUBBLERTREE1"4 2 2257 DRIPLINESHRUB1"7 1 6558 DRIPLINESHRUB1"4 1 318REFER TO IRRIGATION LEGEND FOR CONTROL VALVE MANUFACTURER, MODELNUMBER, AND DESCRIPTION.

PHASE 1PHASE 2PHASE 2PHASE 1
PHASE 1PHASE 2
PHASE 2
PHASE 2 PHASE 2
PHASE 2

5.b
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
PUMP
C MCR
MV1 1/2"1 1/2" 1 1/2" 3/4"3/4"
1"
3/4"
HYDROZONE LEGEND:HYDROZONE 1 (HZ1)LOW WATER USE SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER,USING SUBSURFACE DRIP LINE IRRIGATION w/ 12"SPACING.HYDROZONE 2 (HZ2)MODERATE WATER USE TREES USING RWSBUBBLER IRRIGATION.HYDROZONE 3 (HZ3)HIGH WATER USE WATER FEATURE USING AN AUTO-FILL SYSTEM.REFER TO WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS AND CONTROLLERCHARTS ON SHEETS L-4.3 - L-4.4 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.PLEASE ALSO REFER TO VALVE CALLOUT CHARTS ON THEIRRIGATION PLANS.

W
PIPE SIZING CHART:SCHEDULE 40 PVCA 3/4" 0-8 GPMB 1" 9-12 GPMC 1 1/4" 13-22 GPMD 1 1/2" 23-30 GPME 2" 31-50 GPMTHIS SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO USE WATER FROM A POTABLE WATER SOURCEPASEO IMPROVEMENT PLANSCITY OF COLTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Richard Krumwiede: CA Lic. # 2834,AZ LIC. # 29115, NV LIC. # 446 10221-A TRADEMARK ST., RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 91730 PH: (909) 484-2800 PROJECT MANAGER: ROBERT COLLINGSEMAIL: [email protected]: (909) 484-2800 EXT. 1007 12-03-21
0SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4'8' 16' 32'
PLAN CROSS REFERENCES:FOR NOTES AND LEGENDS, SEE THIS SHEET & L-4.1.FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET L-4.3 & L-4.4FOR SPECIFICATIONS, SEE BOOK SPECIFICATIONSFOR CORRESPONDING DEMOLITION PLAN SEE SHEET L-1.2FOR CORRESPONDING GRADING PLAN SEE SHEET L-2.2FOR CORRESPONDING CONSTRUCTION PLAN SEE SHEET L-3.2FOR CORRESPONDING PLANTING PLAN SEE SHEET L-5.2 NORTH

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
NORTH 7TH STREET

SHEET KEY
SEE SHEETS L-1.1,L-2.1, L-3.1, L-4.1SEE SHEETS L-1.2,L-2.2, L-3.2, L-4.2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-3.1
IRRIGATION NOTE:IRRIGATION LATERALS, MAINLINES, ANDEQUIPMENT ARE SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY FORVISUAL CLARITY ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO FIELDVERIFY LOCATIONS AND PLACE PER LOCAL CODE.

FLUSH VALVE NOTE:FLUSH VALVES TO BE INSTALLED AT FURTHEST AND LOWEST END OF EACHRUN OF DRIPLINE. FLUSH VALVES TO BE LOCATED WITHIN EACH PLANTERAREA OF DRIPLINE SYSTEM.

TYPICAL POTABLE WATER COMMERCIAL P.O.C.

EXISTING METER

RAIN SENSOR

METEREDCONTROLLERPEDESTALFLOW SENSORMASTER VALVENORMALLY CLOSED

MAINLINEGATE VALVE

BACK FLOWPREVENTION
NOTE:EQUIPMENT AND SIZE PERIRRIGATION PLAN AND LEGEND.

MMV
CR
POINT OF CONNECTION NOTE:MAKE POINT OF CONNECTION IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM OF EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER METERPROVIDED BY OTHERS. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. EXTEND NEW TYPE 'K'COPPER PIPE (OR AS REQUIRED PER LOCAL CODE) TO LINE SIZED GATE VALVES AS SHOWN.STATIC WATER PRESSURE: 50 PSISYSTEM DESIGNED PRESSURE:44.70 PSIMAXIMUM IRRIGATION DEMAND: 7 GPM

POINT OF CONNECTIONENLARGEMENT
SEE P.O.C. ENLARGEMENT THIS SHEET.
12 3
#
CONTROLLER AND WEATHER SENSOR NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE CONTROLLER AND WEATHERSENSOR ARE CONNECTED AND OPERATIONAL PRIOR TOFINAL INSPECTION. INSTALL METERED ENCLOSURE INCONCRETE PLAN PER DETAIL.

CONTROLLER NOTE:AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION CONTROLLER TO BE PEDESTAL - METERED PEDESTAL MOUNTED ON CONCRETE PAD, MAKE AND MODEL AS SPECIFIED ONIRRIGATION LEGEND. INSTALLATION LOCATION TO BE VERIFIED, LOCATION SHOWN IS APPROXIMATE. CONNECT TO 110V CIRCUIT FROM ELECTRICMETER. LOCATION TO BE COORDINATED WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. PROVIDE AND INSTALL BATTERIES IN CONTROLLER FOR BACKUPPOWER.RAINBIRD CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY w/ IQ CELLULAR CARTRIDGE, GROUNDING ROD, RAIN SENSOR, AND MASTER VALVE / FLOW SENSOR IN AMETERED STAINLESS STEEL CABINET, AVAILABLE FROM SITE ONE GREEN TECH. TEL: 714-585-9352CONTACT JOHN ROSS.MODEL NUMBER: CA5-RB05-12/NCCGP-1/GR-K/RSE/GTFSVC-100P/FAN/LPP PHASE 1
PHASE 1
PHASE 1 PHASE 1
PHASE 1 VALVE CALLOUT CHART:CONTROLLERTYPEPLANTSIZEGPMHZSF1 DRIPLINESHRUB1"4 1 4432 BUBBLERTREE1"2 2 1003 DRIPLINESHRUB1"1 1 284 OMIT5 DRIPLINESHRUB1"7 1 6796 BUBBLERTREE1"4 2 2257 DRIPLINESHRUB1"7 1 6558 DRIPLINESHRUB1"4 1 318REFER TO IRRIGATION LEGEND FOR CONTROL VALVE MANUFACTURER, MODELNUMBER, AND DESCRIPTION.

5.b
Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

PASEO IMPROVEMENT PLANSCITY OF COLTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Richard Krumwiede: CA Lic. # 2834,AZ LIC. # 29115, NV LIC. # 446 10221-A TRADEMARK ST., RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 91730 PH: (909) 484-2800 PROJECT MANAGER: ROBERT COLLINGSEMAIL: [email protected]: (909) 484-2800 EXT. 1007 12-03-21
LEGEND:1.STRONGBOX ENCLOSURE.2.CLOSE NIPPLE.3.BRASS WYE STRAINER WITH 100MESH MONEL SCREEN.4.FINISH GRADE.5.BACKFLOW PREVENTER (825YA)ASSEMBLY.6.BALL VALVE (2) PLACES.7.BRASS UNION.8.6" THICK x 18" WIDE CONCRETE PAD(LENGTH VARIES PERSIZE/MANUFACTURER). SLOPE TODRAIN AT MINIMUM 2%.9.PVC SLEEVE REQUIRED FOR PIPETHROUGH CONCRETE PAD.10.90% COMPACTION REQUIRED.11.COPPER RISER - TYPICAL (2) PLACES.12.SCH 80 PVC MALE ADAPTOR.13.LINE TO SYSTEM.14.COPPER ELBOW TYPICAL (2) PLACES. 1 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY (825YA)ASCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
NOTES:A.INSTALL PER LOCAL CODES.B.EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM OF 24" FROM ANY STRUCTURES OR HARDSCAPING.C.WHEN UNIT IS NEXT TO A STRUCTURE (I.E. WALL, BUILDING, ETC.) MOUNT TEST COCKS ON OPEN ORNON-STRUCTURE SIDE.D.ORIENT UNIT PARALLEL TO STREET.E.SCREEN UNIT WITH SHRUBS WHENEVER POSSIBLE.F.DIALECTIC FITTINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR CONNECTIONS OF DISSIMILAR METALS.

FROM WATERSOURCE TO METERFLOW
18" ORPER LOCAL CODE
23 4
5678
9 1011
1213
14 4"
FLOW
TOP VIEWLEGEND:1.12" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX &COVER MARKED "B.V."2.FINISH GRADE.3.BALL VALVE. SEE IRRIGATION LEGENDFOR MODEL NO.4.3/4" GRAVEL BASE.5.SCH. 80 PVC UNION.6.SCH. 80 PVC MALE ADAPTORS (2).7.SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED NIPPLE(3 LOCATIONS).

SECTION VIEW
6"MIN. 18"MIN.
1" IN LAWN AREAS3" IN PLANT BEDS
1 BALL VALVEBSCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
NOTES:A.PLACE AGGREGATE PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OF VALVE BOX. 7 5
4 2
3 6
LEGEND:1.ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE.2.RECTANGULAR PLASTIC VALVE BOX W/ BOLT-DOWNCOVER. HEAT BRAND VALVE STATION NO. ON LID IN 2"HIGH CHARACTERS.3.APPROVED YELLOW PLASTIC CHRISTY VALVE I.D. TAG.4.FINISH GRADE.5.PVC UNION FOR SERVICING ASSEMBLY (TYP).6.PVC LATERAL LINE, SIZE PER PLAN.7.COMMON BRICK (4) REQUIRED.8.COMMON WIRE TO OTHER VALVES ON SAMECONTROLLER.9.3/4" CRUSHED ROCK, 8" DEEP.

10.CONTROL / COMMON WIRES FROM CONTROLLER.11.PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE.12.PVC SCH. 80 ELBOW.13.WIRE CONNECTOR.14.PVC SCH. 80 TEE.15.COIL WIRES PER SPECIFICATIONS.

REMOTE CONTROL VALVEGSCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
NOTES:A.USE TEFLON TAPE OR TEFLON PIPEDOPE ON ALL PVC TO PVC OR METALTO PVC MALE PIPE THREADS. 2"
2" CLR
12 1010
6"
9 8 3 5 7 6
11 1515 1313 1 2 4
14 7
LEGEND:1.MULCH BED.2.FINISH GRADE.3.PVC LATERAL LINE, SIZE PER PLAN.4.AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVE PER IRRIGATION PLAN.5.PRESSURE REGULATING, QUICK CHECK BASKETFILTER.6.WATERPROOF WIRE CONNECTORS PER IRRIGATIONSPECIFICATIONS.7.PILOT WIRE.8.APPROVED YELLOW PLASTIC CHRISTY VALVE I.D. TAG.9.3/4" CRUSHED GRAVEL, 3 CU. FT. MINIMUM.10.BRICK SUPPORT, (4) REQUIRED.11.RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX w/ BOLT DOWN COVER PERSPECIFICATIONS.12.PVC UNION FOR SERVICING ASSEMBLY.13.BALL VALVE.14.CONTROL WIRE EXPANSION LOOP.

15.PRESSURE MAINLINE.16.PVC SCH. 80 TEE.17.PVC SCH. 80 ELBOW.18.PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE.

REMOTE CONTROL DRIP VALVEFSCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
NOTES:A.INSTALL VALVES MIN. OF 2' APART, AND A MIN. OF 2' FROMSTRUCTURES AND HARDSCAPE IN SHRUB AREAS.B.PLACE 3/4" CRUSHED GRAVEL PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONOF VALVE BOX.C.PLACE VALVE BOX AT RIGHT ANGLE TO ADJACENTHARDSCAPE OR STRUCTURE.D.PROVIDE PLASTIC VALVE CHRISTY I.D. TAGS PERSPECIFICATIONS.E.HEAT BRAND BOX 'DRIP RCV'.F.USE NON-HARDENING TEFLON PIPE SEALANT ON ALLTHREADED CONNECTIONS. 1 3
5 12
112
181718
6 4
1516 7
14 13 8 9 10 2" CLR
LEGEND:1.PLASTIC VALVE BOX W/ GREENLOCKING COVER, ETCHED "QC"(CARSON OR EQUAL).2.FINISH GRADE.3.QUICK COUPLING VALVE W/LOCKING RUBBER CAP PERIRRIGATION LEGEND.4.STAINLESS STEEL SCREWCLAMP, MIN. (3) PLACES.5.3/4" WASHED CRUSHEDAGGREGATE BASE.6.SPEARS SCH. 80PRE-MANUFACTURED SWINGJOINT RISER ASSEMBLY.7.PRESSURE SUPPLY LINEFITTING.8.PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE.9.#4 REBAR STAKE (24" LONG).10.STRUCTURE, OR ADJACENTPAVING.

QUICK COUPLERDSCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
NOTES:A.PLACE AGGREGATE PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OF VALVE BOX. 6" MIN.
18" MIN.AT GRADE IN TURFLEVEL WITH MULCH IN SHRUB BED
6" MIN.18" MAX.
1"
2 3 1 10
49 5
6 8 6 67
ELEVATIONLEGEND:1.PLASTIC VALVE BOX (CARSON OR EQUAL) W/ PLASTICINTEGRATED LOCKING LID. PLACE AT GRADE IN TURF AREAS AND3" ABOVE IN SHRUB BEDS.2.MASTER CONTROL VALVE PER IRRIGATION LEGEND.3.SNAP-TITE WATERPROOF CONNECTOR OR EQUAL.4.PIG-TAIL EXPANSION LOOM (MIN. 24" LONG).5.1" PVC CONDUIT TO CONTROLLER PEDESTAL.6.FLOW METER PER IRRIGATION LEGEND.

7.MAINLINE SIZE SHALL BE EQUAL DIAMETER AS FLOW METER SIZE.8.MIN. DISTANCE DOWNSTREAM OF UNINTERRUPTED PIPE (5X DIA.OF FLOW METER SIZE).9.MIN. DISTANCE UPSTREAM OF UNINTERRUPTED PIPE (10X DIA. OFFLOW METER SIZE). 4 FLOW
FLOW METER & MASTER VALVEESCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
UF 14 WIRESBLUE
NOTE:A.WATERPROOF ALL WIRE CONNECTIONS.

IRRIGATION CONTROLLER

WHITEBLUE

REDBLACK
65 8
9 1 243(COMMON)WHITEUF 14 WIRESBLACK
UF 14 WIRESRED

TRENCHING SECTION
LEGEND:1.NON-PRESSURE LATERAL LINE.2.PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE.3.CONTROL WIRES.4.CLEAN BACKFILL - 90% COMPACTION REQUIRED.5.6" MIN. SAND BEDDING AND SHADDING.6.2" MIN. OF CLEAN EARTH.7.NON-PRESSURE LATERAL LINE SLEEVE - SIZE TWICEDIAMETER OF NON-PRESSURE LATERAL LINE.

8.PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE SLEEVE - SIZE TWICEDIAMETER OF PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE.9.CONTROL WIRE SLEEVE - SIZE PER PLAN, INSTALLADJACENT TO PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE.10.FINISH GRADE.11.HARDSCAPE PER CONSTRUCTION PLANS. 9 TRENCHING & SLEEVINGCSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
TRENCHING NOTES:A.BELOW PAVED AREAS A MINIMUM OF 6"LAYER OF CLEAN EARTH SHALL BEINSTALLED ABOVE AND BELOW PIPING.B.PROVIDE MINIMUM COVER OF 24" ONPRESSURE SUPPLY LINES 3" AND LARGER.C.WHEN USING RECLAIMED WATER,MAINTAIN MINIMUM OF 10' HORIZONTALSEPARATION BETWEEN POTABLE ANDRECLAIMED PRESSURE LINES WHERELINES CROSS, PROVIDE PVC SLEEVE FORPOTABLE LINE MINIMUM 5' EACH SIDE OFRECLAIMED WATER LINE.D.BUNDLE WIRES WITH TAPE EVERY 10'.

SLEEVING SECTION
6"TYP
2"3"2'-0"MIN. SLEEVING NOTES:A.ALL SLEEVES TO BE SCH. 40 PVC.B.EXTEND ALL SLEEVES 12" BEYOND EDGEOF HARDSCAPING AT BOTH ENDS.C.ROUTE SLEEVING ALONG HANDICAP RAMP.D.PIPING UNDER PAVEMENT SUSCEPTIBLETO TRAFFIC LOADS REFER TO CITY STD.24" MIN. TO 36" MAX. DEPTH TO TOP OFPIPE BELOW STRUCTURAL SECTION. 4 11
5 7
8 ASREQUIRED106"TYP
1'-0"MIN.
18"MIN.26
1 34
LEGEND:1.4-INCH LOCKING GRATE.2.BUBBLER: RAINBIRD 0.25 GPM.3.ROOT ZONE WATERING ASSEMBLY.*RAINBIRD RWS-M-B-C-1401 OR PER IRRIGATIONLEGEND. (INCLUDES 0.25 BUBBLER PER LEGENDWITH RISER, SWING ASSEMBLY, LOCKING GRATE, 1/2"MALE NPT INLET, AND BASKET CANISTER).4.FINISH GRADE.5.CHECK VALVE.6.PEA GRAVEL FILL.7.1/2-INCH PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE.8.1/2-INCH 90-DEGREE ELBOW.9.12-INCH SWING ASSEMBLY.10.1/2-INCH MALE NPT INLET.11.PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL.12.LATERAL PIPE.13.4-INCH BASKET WEAVE CANISTER.

BUBBLER TO TREEHSCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
123 4
56789
10111213

LATERAL

BUBBLERROOT BALLBUBBLERTREE

5.b
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project) METERED CONTROLLER PEDESTALASCALE: N.T.S.

PASEO IMPROVEMENT PLANSCITY OF COLTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Richard Krumwiede: CA Lic. # 2834,AZ LIC. # 29115, NV LIC. # 446 10221-A TRADEMARK ST., RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 91730 PH: (909) 484-2800 PROJECT MANAGER: ROBERT COLLINGSEMAIL: [email protected]: (909) 484-2800 EXT. 1007 12-03-21
LEGEND:1.PVC INPUT LATERAL FROM VALVE, SIZE AS NOTEDON IRRIGATION PLAN.2.NETAFIM DRIPPERLINE TLCV, EMITTERS ANDSPACING BETWEEN LINES AS PER IRRIGATIONLEGEND.3.MANUAL 1/2" FLUSH VALVE, MODEL AS NOTED ONIRRIGATION PLAN. INSTALL IN PLANTER AREA ATLOW END FARTHEST FROM VALVE. SEE FLUSHVALVE DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION.4.PVC EXHAUST HEADER, SIZE AS REQUIRED (3/4"MINIMUM). CONNECT TECHLINE TO PVC WITH PVCTEES AND COMPRESSION FITTINGS. GLUE ALLPVC-TO-PVC CONNECTIONS.5.PVC COMPRESSION FITTINGS FOR ALLTECHLINE-TO-TECHLINE CONNECTIONS.6.PLANTER AREA - SEE PLANS.7.EDGE OF PLANTER AREA.8.PVC FITTINGS, TYPE AND SIZE AS REQUIRED.GLUE ALL PVC-TO-PVC CONNECTIONS. USECOMPRESSION FITTINGS FOR ALLPVC-TO-TECHLINE CONNECTIONS.9.TIE DOWN STAKE, SPACING AT 2' O.C. MAX.10.FINISH GRADE.11.INSTALL TWO EMITTERS PER VINE INTO DRIPLINE,EXTEND w/ 1/4" TUBING W/ DIFFUSER BUG CAP.NOTES:A.INSTALL LINES AT 3" BELOW SURFACE FOR TURF AREAS, 3" IN SHRUB AREAS.B.PVC FITTINGS, TYPE AND SIZE AS REQUIRED.C.GLUE ALL PVC-TO-PVC CONNECTIONS.D.USE COMPRESSION FITTINGS FOR ALL PVC-TO-TECHLINE CONNECTIONS.E.USE UVR PVC MATERIAL FOR ALL ON GRADE MATERIAL.F.INSTALL NETFIM IN-LINE CHECK VALVE FOR ALL CONDITIONS WHERE SYSTEMELEV. EXCEED 4 1/2'. NO LOW HEAD DRAINAGE ALLOWED.

SECTION
PLAN
DRIPLINE BELOW GRADEBSCALE: N.T.S.
2 9 10
1 576
483
12"3" TO 6"(TYP.)
2 TURF3"
8 6"
VINE 11
MANUAL FLUSH VALVE w/ DRAINCSCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
6"
FLOW
FLUSH WITH TURF AREAS3" ABOVE GRADE AT PLANTER AREAS
LEGEND:1.1/2" DIAMETER DRIPLINE.2.1/2" NETAFIM TLSOV VALVE w/ COMPRESSION CONNECTION.3.10" DIAMETER PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH GREEN LID.4.6" CRUSHED GRAVEL.5.FINISH GRADE.6.18" LONG FLEX POLY-PIPE TO DIRECT FLUSH. 2 3
4 5
1 6
12" MIN.

LEGEND:1.BUBBLER PER IRRIGATION LEGEND.2.6" POP-UP SPRAY BODY PER IRRIGATION LEGEND.3.SCH 40 PVC LATERAL.4.MARLEX 90° STREET ELL.5.SCH 40 PVC LATERAL LINE.6.PVC TXT 90° ELL.7.TREE TRUNK.8.ROOT BALL.9.FINISH GRADE.10.TYPICAL BACKFILL LIMIT.

POP-UP BUBBLER FOR EX. PALMSDSCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
PLAN

SECTION
5 1 7 1
10 7
8 10
9 4
6 5 3
36" +/-
12 CA5 - STRONGBOX: MPE-A16-10K (18"W x 52"H x 32"D)METER PEDESTAL ENCLOSURE - CONCRETE PADCONTROLLER ASSEMBLY (CA) 2 FLOW
4 +
1 12
3 4

FRONT VIEW
89-8'-12' AWAY
3 SIDE VIEW

CIRCUITBREAKERS
ELECT.METER
1312 910
67 1112345678
STRONGBOX STAINLESS STEEL NEMA 3R RAINPROOFENCLOSURE (UL LISTED).CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY. ASSEMBLED ONBACKBOARD BY SITEONE GREEN TECH.TERMINAL STRIP FOR VALVE WIRES.POWER SWITCH / GFCI RECEPTACLE.1" CONDUIT AND SWEEP ELL FOR 110 VAC POWER LINERUN TO CONTROLLER SIDE FROM ELECTRICAL METER. 1" CONDUIT AND SWEEP ELL WITH FLOW SENSOR CABLE.910111213141516 ELECTRICAL FLEX CONDUIT FOR POWER.
5/8" X 8' GROUND ROD WITH #6 GROUND WIRE ANDCLAMP. LOCATE 8'-12' FROM ENCLOSURE. 10" ROUND VALVE BOX AROUND GROUND ROD. FILLWITH 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK. 3" CONDUIT AND SWEEP ELL FOR LEAD WIRES.1" CONDUIT AND SWEEP ELL FOR MASTER VALVE WIRES.

FLOW SENSOR TERMINAL BOARD.
6" MIN THICK, CONCRETE PAD WITH ANCHOR BOLTSPER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. 5 FINISHED GRADE.#6 GROUND WIRE SECURED TO BACKBOARDGROUNDING TERMINAL. 1" CONDUIT AND SWEEP ELL FOR GROUND WIRE.
14157
1616
5 NOTE: SEE IRRIGATION LEGEND CALL OUT FOR INCLUDED OPTIONS. SUGGESTED CONDUIT SIZES MAY NEED TO BE LARGER. 12 TM
SECTIONLEGEND:1.PLANTER DRIPLINE PER IRRIGATION LEGEND.2.1/2" PVC NIPPLE. LENGTH AS REQUIRED.3.PVC TEE. MODEL SXSXT.4.EMITTER PER IRRIGATION LEGEND. (2) PER VINE.5.1/4" EMITTER DISTRIBUTION TUBING, LENGTH AS REQUIRED.6.EMITTER STABILIZER.7.BUG CAP.8.ADJACENT PAVING PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.9.VINE AND ROOTBALL PER PLANTING PLAN.10.COMPACTED SUBGRADE.11.3" THICK MULCH PER PLANTING PLAN.

EMITTER TO VINEESCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
NOTES:A.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATEINSTALLATION OF PIPING UNDERHARDSCAPE w/ GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 12" MINIMUM3"
6 7 8119
412
310 5

5.b
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

CONTROLLER CHARTSCSCALE: N.T.S.

PRESSURE LOSS CHARTASCALE: N.T.S.

5.b
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
NORTH 7TH STREET
PUMP
C

JBJB JB JB JBJB JB JBJBHB HBHBHBHBHB HB HBHBHBHB HB
HBHBHB
HBHBHB

HBHBHBHBHBD D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDD DD

DDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD HBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBDHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBSLSL

SLSLSL SLSL SLSLSLSL SLSLSLSLSLHBHBHB JBHBHBSLSLSLSLSLSL SL

HBHBHBHB
D

HBHBHBDDDDD DDD
SLSL

HBHBHBHBHBHB

HBHBHBHBHBHBHBHB
3 3 3 3
SL
JBJB

HB DDD DD

HBHBHBDD
81AM
49AM
91AM
DDD
211AM
37AM
19AM
HB
71AM31AM
8AM
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

JBJBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBJBHBHB HBJBHB
21AM 22AM 42AM 7AM
SHRUBSCODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZESPACINGWATER USEQTYDETAILD Dianella revoluta `Little Rev`Little Rev Flax Lily1 Gal.18" O.C.L 102 HBHesperaloe parviflora `Perpa` TMBrakelights Red Yucca2 Gal.24" O.C.L 81 JBJuniperus Scopulorum `Blue Arrow`Blue Arrow Juniper15 Gal.Per PlanM 16 SLSalvia leucanthaMexican Bush Sage1 Gal.36" O.C.L 26
VINES/ESPALIERSCODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZESPACINGWATER USEQTYDETAIL3 Trachelospermum jasminoides `Star`Star Jasmine5 Gal.Per PlanM 15

GROUNDCOVERCODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZESPACINGWATER USEQTYDETAIL AMAchillea x `Moonshine`Moonshine Yarrow1 Gal.12" O.C.L 634 D
HB
JB
SL
PLANTING LEGEND: PHASE 2
TREESCALL-OUTSYMBOLSIZE(gal./box)
SHRUBSCALL-OUTSYMBOLQUANTITYYZ#T-## #
SYMBOL LEGEND:

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
NORTH 7TH STREET

SHEET KEY
SEE SHEETS L-1.1,L-2.1, L-3.1, L-4.1SEE SHEETS L-1.2,L-2.2, L-3.2, L-4.2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-4.2
PLANTING NOTES:1.SHRUB LAYOUT AS SHOWN ON PLAN INDICATES "SHRUB MASSES." QUANTITIES ARE AS SHOWN ON PLAN, ON-CENTER SPACING AS SHOWN ON LEGEND. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES BASED ON SPACINGAND ADD ADDITIONAL PLANT MATERIAL (AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER) REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN DESIGN INTENT DUE TO EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS NOT ANTICIPATED DURING DESIGN. LAYOUT/SPACINGWILL EITHER BE TRIANGULAR OR LINEAR AS SHOWN ON PLAN OR LEGEND. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO APPROVE FINAL LAYOUT IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2.CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SITE CONDITIONS WHICH PREVENT INSTALLATION PER PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LIABLE FOR REMOVING AND RE-INSTALLING IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT, AND REPLANTING AREAS WHICH ARE NOT INSTALLED PER PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS.4.REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSPECTION/CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE.5.IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AND OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIALS.6.TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AFTER CONCRETE PLACEMENT, BUT NOT BEFORE IRRIGATION COVERAGE TEST NO. 1 HAS BEEN APPROVED. (SEE SPECIFICATIONS).7.PLACE TREES BETWEEN IRRIGATION HEADS WHEREVER POSSIBLE.8.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE FOUR (4) SOIL SAMPLES FROM THE SITE AT LOCATIONS APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE SAMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN AT A DEPTH OF 12' AFTER ROUGHGRADING AND SUBMITTED TO AN APPROVED SOIL AND PLANT LABORATORY FOR AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY TESTING. THE COST OF TESTING SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACTOR'S BID.9.THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOIL REPORT SHALL SUPERSEDE THE SOIL PREPARATION AND BACKFILL MIX SPECIFICATIONS (SEE SPECIFICATIONS). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COPY OF ALL SOILSREPORTS TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO MODIFICATION OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS.10.SHREDDED MULCH INSTALLATION: INSTALL SHREDDED MULCH IN ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS PER SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON PLANS.11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REPAIRS AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY DAMAGED LANDSCAPE AREAS BEYOND THE LIMIT OF WORK, INCLUDING REPAIRING ANY IRRIGATION LINES/SPRINKLER HEADS,THAT IS A DIRECT RESULT OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION AND/OR HIS SUB-CONTRACTOR. REPLACEMENT ITEMS SHALL BE EXACT DUPLICATION OF ORIGINAL WORK OR PLANTS, UNLESS OTHERWISEAPPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.12.WHEREVER GROUNDCOVER AREAS ARE ADJACENT TO TURF INSTALL CONCRETE MOW STRIP OR HEADER BOARD AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS.13.CLEAN-UP SHALL TAKE PLACE ON A DAILY BASIS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.14.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN ALL GRADES AND FLOW LINES AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN. WHERE SOD IS TO BE INSTALLED ON A SWALE,THE FINISH GRADE MUST BE ADJUSTED SOTHE SOD DOES NOT RESTRICT THE FLOW.

PHASE 1PHASE 2 PHASE 1PHASE 2PHASE 2PHASE 1
PHASE 1PHASE 2
PHASE 2
PHASE 2 PHASE 2
PHASE 2

5.b
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
PUMP
CDD

HBHBHBHBHBHBHBHB
AAAA
AAAA

AAAAA AAAA
AAAA
AAAA
AAAD D

D DD DDD
DDDD

DDDAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDD DDDDDDD DDDDD DDDDDD

AAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDAAAA AAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDD

HBHBHBHBHB
DSLSL
HBHB
3 3 3

HBHBHBHBDD
81AM
56AM
3 HB
HB
D
14AM
14AM
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

TREESCODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZESPACINGWATER USEQTYDETAIL LCLophostemon confertusBrisbane Box15 Gal.M/L 4
SHRUBSCODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZESPACINGWATER USEQTYDETAILA Aloe x `Blue Elf`Aloe 1 Gal.18" O.C.L 80 D Dianella revoluta `Little Rev`Little Rev Flax Lily1 Gal.18" O.C.L 114 HBHesperaloe parviflora `Perpa` TMBrakelights Red Yucca2 Gal.24" O.C.L 24 SLSalvia leucanthaMexican Bush Sage1 Gal.36" O.C.L 2
VINES/ESPALIERSCODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZESPACINGWATER USEQTYDETAIL1 Clytostoma callistegioidesViolet Trumpet Vine5 Gal.Per PlanM 8 2 Gelsemium sempervirens `Carolina`Yellow Jessamine5 Gal.Per PlanM 8 3 Trachelospermum jasminoides `Star`Star Jasmine5 Gal.Per PlanM 7

GROUNDCOVERCODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZESPACINGWATER USEQTYDETAIL AMAchillea x `Moonshine`Moonshine Yarrow1 Gal.12" O.C.L 205 GRGeranium x `Rozanne`Rozanne Cranesbill1 Gal.24" O.C.M 36 sf AD
HB
SL
PLANTING LEGEND: PHASE 1
TREESCALL-OUTSYMBOLSIZE(gal./box)
SHRUBSCALL-OUTSYMBOLQUANTITYYZ#T-## #
SYMBOL LEGEND:

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
NORTH 7TH STREET

SHEET KEY
SEE SHEETS L-1.1,L-2.1, L-3.1, L-4.1SEE SHEETS L-1.2,L-2.2, L-3.2, L-4.2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-4.1
PLAN CROSS REFERENCES:FOR NOTES AND LEGENDS, SEE SHEET L-5.1FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET L-5.3FOR SPECIFICATIONS, SEE BOOK SPECIFICATIONSFOR CORRESPONDING DEMOLITION PLAN SEE SHEET L-1.2FOR CORRESPONDING GRADING PLAN SEE SHEET L-2.2FOR CORRESPONDING CONSTRUCTION PLAN SEE SHEET L-3.2FOR CORRESPONDING IRRIGATION PLAN SEE SHEET L-4.2 T-124"4
PLANTING NOTES:1.SHRUB LAYOUT AS SHOWN ON PLAN INDICATES "SHRUB MASSES." QUANTITIES ARE AS SHOWN ON PLAN,ON-CENTER SPACING AS SHOWN ON LEGEND. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES BASED ON SPACING ANDADD ADDITIONAL PLANT MATERIAL (AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER) REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN DESIGNINTENT DUE TO EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS NOT ANTICIPATED DURING DESIGN. LAYOUT/SPACING WILL EITHERBE TRIANGULAR OR LINEAR AS SHOWN ON PLAN OR LEGEND. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO APPROVE FINALLAYOUT IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2.CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SITE CONDITIONS WHICH PREVENTINSTALLATION PER PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LIABLE FOR REMOVING AND RE-INSTALLING IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT, AND REPLANTINGAREAS WHICH ARE NOT INSTALLED PER PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS.4.REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSPECTION/CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE.5.IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AND OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIALS.6.TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AFTER CONCRETE PLACEMENT, BUT NOT BEFORE IRRIGATIONCOVERAGE TEST NO. 1 HAS BEEN APPROVED. (SEE SPECIFICATIONS).7.PLACE TREES BETWEEN IRRIGATION HEADS WHEREVER POSSIBLE.8.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE FOUR (4) SOIL SAMPLES FROM THE SITE AT LOCATIONS APPROVED BYTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE SAMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN AT A DEPTH OF 12' AFTER ROUGH GRADING ANDSUBMITTED TO AN APPROVED SOIL AND PLANT LABORATORY FOR AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY TESTING. THECOST OF TESTING SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACTOR'S BID.9.THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOIL REPORT SHALL SUPERSEDE THE SOIL PREPARATION AND BACKFILL MIXSPECIFICATIONS (SEE SPECIFICATIONS). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COPY OF ALL SOILS REPORTS TOTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO MODIFICATION OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS.10.SHREDDED MULCH INSTALLATION: INSTALL SHREDDED MULCH IN ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS PERSPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON PLANS.11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REPAIRS AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY DAMAGED LANDSCAPEAREAS BEYOND THE LIMIT OF WORK, INCLUDING REPAIRING ANY IRRIGATION LINES/SPRINKLER HEADS, THAT ISA DIRECT RESULT OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION AND/OR HIS SUB-CONTRACTOR. REPLACEMENT ITEMSSHALL BE EXACT DUPLICATION OF ORIGINAL WORK OR PLANTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.12.WHEREVER GROUNDCOVER AREAS ARE ADJACENT TO TURF INSTALL CONCRETE MOW STRIP OR HEADERBOARD AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS.13.CLEAN-UP SHALL TAKE PLACE ON A DAILY BASIS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE.14.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN ALL GRADES AND FLOW LINES AS SHOWN ON THEGRADING PLAN. WHERE SOD IS TO BE INSTALLED ON A SWALE,THE FINISH GRADE MUST BE ADJUSTED SO THESOD DOES NOT RESTRICT THE FLOW.

FOUNTAIN VAULT LOCATION(ALTERNATE NO. 2) NOTE:POTENIAL UNDERGROUND FOUNTAIN VAULT LOCATION.IF THE FOUNTAIN VAULT IS INSTALLED AS PART OF THEPROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CREDIT THE CLIENTFOR THE PLANTING MATERIAL NOT INSTALLED IN THISLOCATION.

PHASE 1
PHASE 1
PHASE 1PHASE 1

5.b
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

SHRUB / GROUNDCOVER SPACINGASCALE: 1'-0" = 1'-0"
LEGEND:A.ALL SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLANTED ATEQUAL SPACING(TRIANGULAR) UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED N PLANS. SEE PLANTING LEGEND FORSPACING REQUIREMENTS.

EQUALEQUAL EQUAL
1 EQUAL2
LEGEND:1.UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.2.BACKFILL MIX PER PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS.3.FERTILIZER TABLETS PER PLANTING SPECS.4.PLANT PIT TO BE TWICE ROOT BALL WIDTH ANDFLUSH WITH THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOT BALL.5.3" BERM TO FORM WATERING BASIN.6.ROOT BALL.7.FINISH GRADE.8.SHRUB PER PLANTING PLAN.9.3" THICK MULCH LAYER PER PLANTING PLAN.

SHRUB PLANTINGBSCALE: NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:A.UNTANGLE MATTED ROOTS BY LOOSENING ALLROOTS AT EDGE OF ROOT BALL w/ WATER FROMHOSE. DO NOT CRACK BALL OF ROOTS.B.PLACE FERTILIZER TABS IN PLANT CONTAINERPRIOR TO PLANTING FOR OBSERVATION PURPOSES. 1 243
96 7
8 5
CLEAR TRUNK (C.T.)MEASUREMENT

SECTION
LEGEND:1.TIE FRONDS TOGETHER AT (2) PLACES w/ JUTETWINE TO STABILIZE FRONDS AND PROTECTHEART PRIOR TO MOVEMENT AND DELIVERY.2.TRIM NO MORE THAN 1/3 OF THE PALM FRONDS.3.TRIM CROWN FOR UNIFORMITY ONLY.4.PALM TRUNK. ALL PALMS TO E SKINNED UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.5.TEMPORARY 4" BERM TO FORM WATERINGBASIN.6.PLANTING MEDIUM SAND BACKFILL (PERPLANTING SPECIFICATIONS).7.PALM ROOT BALL..8.UNDISTURBED NATIVE SUB-GRADE.9.3" THICK MULCH LAYER PER PLANTING PLAN. 1 PALM PLANTINGCSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
NOTES:A.CONTRACTOR TO WATER PALM WITH VITAMIN B-1PLANT TONIC TO HELP REDUCE TRANSPLANT SHOCK.B.SIZING PER AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERYSTOCK ANSI Z60.1.C.REMOVING ALL LIVE FRONDS BELOW A 45° ANGLESHALL BE CONSIDERED UNACCEPTABLE PRACTICEPER ANSI A300. 234
59 68

PER PALM TYPEAND GROWER'S RECOMMENDATION
4"
2 TIMESROOT BALL SIZE
3"
7 BASE OFPINEAPPLE
LINEAR ROOT BARRIERDSCALE: N.T.S.
7'-6"

PLAN ISOMETRIC SECTION
LEGEND:1.18" DEEP LINEAR-STYLE ROOT BARRIER. PLACE BARRIER, IN TRENCH w/ THE VERTICAL RIBS FACING TOWARD TREEAND ALIGN IN A STRAIGHT FASHION. USE HARDSCAPE EDGE AS A GUIDE AND BACKFILL AGAINST THE BARRIER TOPROVIDE A CLEAN FIT. TOP OF BARRIER TO EXTEND TO 1" BELOW OF CURB OR WALK, OR 1" BELOW TOP OF MULCHLAYER OR FINISH GRADE (WHICHEVER IS HIGHEST).2.TREE TRUNK LOCATION (CANOPY SHOWN AS DASHED CIRCLE).3.CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER PLAN.4.CONCRETE CURB PER PLAN.5.VERTICAL RIBS6.COMPACTED SUB-GRADE. 7'-6"
5'-0"OR LESS
3 2
4 11
3 6
1 5'-0"OR LESS 1"MIN5
LEGEND:1.HARDSCAPE / HEADER BOARD.2.SHREDDED MULCH (MEDIUM GRIND). DO NOT USE BARK CHIPS.3.FINISH GRADE.4.SHOVEL CUT DEEPENED EDGE ADJACENT TO PAVING.5.MULCH DEPTH PER PLANTING PLAN.

MULCHESCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
NOTES:A.MULCH UNDER TREES AND SHRUBS,AND BLEND INTO EDGES ATGROUNDCOVER AREAS. 1 2
4 3
5 4"
12" 2
GRAVEL MULCHFSCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
LEGEND:1. PAVING PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.2. 3" DEEP NON-COMPACTED 3/4" DIA. CRUSHED STONE LAYER,COLOR AND TYPE PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN. WATER IN PLACE.3. FINISH GRADE.4. SHOVEL CUT DEEPENED EDGE ADJACENT TO PAVING.5. SUB-GRADE.

NOTES:A. SPREAD CRUSHED STONE UNDER TREES TOPROVIDE AN EVEN LAYER AT CROWN OF TREE. 12"

PERPLAN
3"
31 5 4
PLANTER w/ VINEGSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
LEGEND:1.96" x 18" x 36" PREFABRICATED PLANTER, MATERIALAND FINISH PER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALSSCHEDULE.2.SCREEN TRELLIS WITH BRACKET SUPPORTS.3.ADJACENT PAVING PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN.4.COMPACTED SUBGRADE.5.PROVIDE PVC DRAIN LINE WITH ADAPTOR TOPLANTER. CONNECT TO SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM PERGRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN.6.FILTER DRAIN MAT.7.VINE PER PLAN8.LIGHT WEIGHT PLANTER SOIL. AVAILABLE FROM GAILMATERIALS. 2 1
34 12
PLANG1
SECTIONG2
7 568
77 5.b
Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project) SOILS REPORTASCALE: N.T.S.

5.b
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK

NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE

LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
NORTH 7TH STREET
PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 2
E-1.0

ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN

PASEO IMPROVEMENT PLANSCITY OF COLTON

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Richard Krumwiede: CA Lic. # 2834,
AZ LIC. # 29115, NV LIC. # 446
10221-A TRADEMARK ST., RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA 91730 PH: (909) 484-2800
PROJECT MANAGER: ROBERT COLLINGS
EMAIL: [email protected]
PHONE: (909) 484-2800 EXT. 1007

I FOE OF CAL
C
PD
E
TA
R
S
T
ELE
EXP.

ERETSIG
E

FOR AN L
E
9/30/22
L
TRI CA
R
RNIA
ENIGNE
E OISS

I FOE OF CAL
C
No. E 11795
PD
E
TA
R
S
T
ELE
EXP.

ERETSIG
PE
JOS
H

FOR AN L
E
L
TRI CA
R
RNIA
IC

GJ O WO
ENIGNE
Z
E OISS
RJ
Electrical Engineering & Consulting
AC
92346
[email protected]
909 864-0223
Fax 909 864-0280
Engineering Inc.
8048 Palm Ave
Highland. Ca.

Job #
James CornsP.M.
2523
PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 1

5.b
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project) E-2.0

PASEO IMPROVEMENT PLANSCITY OF COLTON

I FOE OF CAL
C
PD
E
TA
R
S
T
ELE
EXP.

ERETSIG
E

FOR AN L
E
9/30/22
L
TRI CA
R
RNIA
ENIGNE
E OISS

I FOE OF CAL
C
No. E 11795
PD
E
TA
R
S
T
ELE
EXP.

ERETSIG
PE
JOS
H

FOR AN L
E
L
TRI CA
R
RNIA
IC

GJ O WO
ENIGNE
Z
E OISS
RJ
Electrical Engineering & Consulting
AC
92346
[email protected]
909 864-0223
Fax 909 864-0280
Engineering Inc.
8048 Palm Ave
Highland. Ca.

Job #
James CornsP.M.
2523

ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS LIST
CONDUIT TRENCH DETAIL 2
SYSTEM GROUND 4
METER PEDESTAL ELEVATION 3
SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM 1
PULLBOX DETAIL 5

SYMBOL LIST, SINGLE LINE & DETAILS

CONCRETE FRAME FOR

INGROUND APPLICATIONS

5.b
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project) E-2.1

PASEO IMPROVEMENT PLANSCITY OF COLTON

I FOE OF CAL
C
PD
E
TA
R
S
T
ELE
EXP.

ERETSIG
E

FOR AN L
E
9/30/22
L
TRI CA
R
RNIA
ENIGNE
E OISS

I FOE OF CAL
C
No. E 11795
PD
E
TA
R
S
T
ELE
EXP.

ERETSIG
PE
JOS
H

FOR AN L
E
L
TRI CA
R
RNIA
IC

GJ O WO
ENIGNE
Z
E OISS
RJ
Electrical Engineering & Consulting
AC
92346
[email protected]
909 864-0223
Fax 909 864-0280
Engineering Inc.
8048 Palm Ave
Highland. Ca.

Job #
James CornsP.M.
2523
WALKWAY LIGHT FIXTURE DETAIL 1

LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE

GENERAL NOTES

LTG FIXTURE SCHED, GEN NOTES & DETAILS

5.b
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Exhibit B – Plans for Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project (3455 : Bid Authorization - La Cadena Dr. Sidewalk & Downtown Paseo Pedestrian Improvement Project)

ITEM NO. 6

STAFF REPORT

DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: BRIAN DICKINSON, PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITY SERVICES

DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY OF COLTON

SHARE AS A MEMBER OF THE RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER

COUNCIL FOR AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE

PREPARATION OF A GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN TO
STETSON ENGINEERS, RESOLUTION NO. R-01-22.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

Approve Resolution R -01-22 of the City Council of the City of Colton to approve the City of Colton’s share in the Rialto Basin Groundwater Council Award of Contract for the Preparation of a Groundwater Management Plan for $53,750.00.

BACKGROUND

On December 1, 2020 the City Council of the City of Colton, approved the Framework Agreement for the Rialto Basin Groundwater Council. The purpose of the Framework Agreement is for coordinating, developing and implementing groundwater management activities that individually or cumulatively address groundwater management in, and groundwater sustainability throughout, the Rialto Basin. The parties are, City of Colton, City of Rialto, West Valley Water District and Fontana Union Water Company.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

The Settlement Agreement requires the Parties to develop, adopt and implement a sustainable groundwater management plan, to include a new index well regime, the possibility of establishing an operating safe yield, and/or other groundwater management tools. 6 Packet Pg. 314
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council
January 4, 2022

Page 2 ends

West Valley Water District will be acting as the Administrative Proje ct Manager, and as such will manage the bidding and contract management process. West Valley Water District will invoice the other parties for their respective proportion al share. Colton’s proportional share is 25% of the total contract cost.

FISCAL IMPACTS

The cost for Colton’s share of contract for preparation of a Groundwate r Management Plan is $53,750.00. This represents Colton’s 25% proportional share. Sufficient a ppropriations for Colton’s share of the contract are available in Water Fund Operations Professional Services Account Number 521-8100-8101-2350-0000-000.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution R-01-22 Colton Share of Rialto Basin Groundwater Council Groundwater Management Plan 01.04.2022

2. Draft Minutes Board Meeting 12.09.2021

3. Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021
6 Packet Pg. 315
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1

RESOLUTION NO. R-01-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLTON TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY OF COLTON’S SHARE AS

A MEMBER OF THE RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER

COUNCIL FOR AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE

PREPARATION OF A GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
TO STETSON ENGINEERS.

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2020 the City Council of the City of Colton, approved the Framework Agreement for the Rialto Basin Groundwater Council.; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Framework Agreement is for coordinating, developing and implementing groundwater management activities that individually or cumulatively address groundwater management in, and groundwater sustainability throughout, the Rialto Basin.; and WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement requires the Parties to develop, adopt and implement a sustainable groundwater management plan, to include a new index well regime, the possibility of establishing an operating safe yield, and/or other groundwater management tools; and
WHEREAS the Settlement Agreement requires the Parties to develop, adopt and implement a sustainable groundwater management plan, to include a new index well regime, the possibility of establishing an operating safe yield, and/or other groundwater management tools NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Colton City Council hereby authorizes the City of Colton’s share for awarding a contract for the preparation of a Groundwater Management plan to Stetson Engineers.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Colton at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 4 th day of January, 2022 , by the following vote:

City of Colton

6.a
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Resolution R-01-22 Colton Share of Rialto Basin Groundwater Council Groundwater Management Plan 01.04.2022 (3453 :
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 2 -

FRANK J. NAVARRO, Mayor

ATTEST:

CAROLINA R. PADILLA, City Clerk

6.a
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Resolution R-01-22 Colton Share of Rialto Basin Groundwater Council Groundwater Management Plan 01.04.2022 (3453 :

RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCI

BOARD MEETING MINUTES
THURSDAY December 9, 2021

Meeting Called to Order at 6:00 pm by Vice President Greg Young.

Members present:

Dr.G, Council Member City of Colton, Primary Representative Brian Dickinson, PW Director City of Colton, Alternate Representative, Staff Deborah Robertson, President City of Rialto, Primary Representative (Arrived at 6:28)
Thomas Crowley, Utilities Manager City of Rialto, Staff Robert DiPrimio, Director Fontana Union Water Company, Primary Representative
Josh Swift, Director of Operations Fontana Union Water Company, Alternate Rep, Staff
Martin Zvirbulis, Vice-President Fontana Union Water Company, Staff Chris Fealy, Water Resources Manager Fontana Union Water Company, Staff Greg Young, Vice President West Valley Water District, Primary Representative Dr. Michael Taylor “Chief”, Director West Valley Water District, Alternate Representative
Van Jew, Assist General Mgr West Valley Water District, Staff Jeff Helsley, Engineering Manager Stetson Engineers
Members Absent:

Ed Scott, Mayor Pro Tem City of Rialto, Alternate Representative

Public Comment:

None

Minutes:

Minutes were reviewed, Motioned for approval by Colton Representative Dr. G. and Seconded by Fontana Representative DiPrimio. Motion carried unanimously.

6.b
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Draft Minutes Board Meeting 12.09.2021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Item 1. – Monthly Report of Production and Water Levels for the Rialto Basin Tom Crowley gave an introduction of the item.

Chris Fealy, Water Resources Manager with Fontana Water Company, summarized the Monthly Report of Production and Groundwater Levels. Dr. G., asked what the acronym RBGC stood for and inquired about Colton’s November Production. Also asked if the Total Well Depth could be included in the report, to which Directed Young also concurred that request.

On Motion by DiPrimio, and Seconded by Dr. G., the Item was Received and Filed Unanimously.

Item 2. – Award of Contract for Rialto Basin Groundwater Plan Van Jew provided a presentation/summary of the need for a Groundwater Management Plan.

Van explained the process of soliciting the Proposals, and evaluation of the Proposals by the staff from each Agency, and the Recommendation to Award to Stetson Engineers.

On Motion by Robertson, and Seconded by Dr. G., the Item was Approved Unanimously.

Item 3. Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan
Josh Swift provided a summary overview, discussing how this came about and the need for this. Also discussed how we may go about moving forward to develop the Plan fully.

Dr. G, had the following questions:
 Timeline for completion. I stated probably 9-12 months. Upon connecting, Jeff Helsley with Stetson Engineers stated we should receive a Draft Report within 12-13 months.  Ask about budgeting/allocation of Funds for Colton’s share. Bob DiPrimio stated that the By-laws state that each Agency approve individually as well. I stated when we bring this item to City Council for formal approval, is when the funds will be authorized.  How would project be paid, all at once or over time. Van Jew stated periodically as specific tasks are completed and invoiced for.

Greg Young asked if each Agency would prepay West Valley Water District upfront. Van stated WVWD would invoice each Agency as they are invoiced by Stetson.

Deborah Robertson asked if WVWD be the Project Manager. Van stated that WVWD will be the Administrative Manager for Contract/Invoicing, but that each Agency would be participating in the Project Management and review of the work product. She also asked if the Agencies had utilized Stetson Engineers previously. None of the Agencies have used Stetson that they were aware of. Brian A. Dickinson stated he had worked with Stetson in the Main San Gabriel Basin on Groundwater Management Planning issues.

6.b
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Draft Minutes Board Meeting 12.09.2021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

On Motion by Robertson, and Seconded by Dr. G., with the following Amended Motion:

• Approve a budget item titled, “Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan,” fund it in the amount of $215,000, and assign a 25% cost share responsibility to each RBGC member agency
• Approve the selection of Stetson Engineers to develop the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan per its proposal in the amount of $197,600, which includes the optional work items
• Appoint, solely for the “Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan,” West Valley Water District to be responsible for the accounting and revenue collection, securing the funding from the RBGC members, and administer, on behalf of the RBGC, the contract with Stetson Engineers to develop the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan.

The Item was Approved Unanimously.

Meeting was adjourned at 6:39 pm
Next meeting: January 27, 2021

6.b
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Draft Minutes Board Meeting 12.09.2021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

September 29, 2021

Mr. Brian Dickenson
City of Colton
650 N La Cadena Dr.

Colton, CA 92324
Mr. Tom Crowley
City of Rialto
150 S. Palm Avenue
Rialto, CA 92376

Mr. Cris Fealy
Fontana Water Company
15966 Arrow Route
Fontana, CA 92335
Mr. Van Jew
West Valley Water District
855 W Baseline Rd.

Rialto, CA 92376

Subject: Proposal for Preparation Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan

Gentlemen:

Stetson Engineers Inc. (Stetson) is pleased to submit this proposal to the Rialto Basin Groundwater Council to develop the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan.

Stetson specializes in the management and development of water resources and has been providing groundwater management services for decades. Using widely accepted water industry standards and relying on extensive, successful past experience in groundwater management, Stetson will develop a Groundwater Management Plan to ensure long -term groundwater sustainability in the Rialto Groundwater Basin.

Stetson has been involved in the Rialto Basin and No Man’s Land for several decades and thoroughly understands the stakeholders, the positions taken, the 1961 Decree, the resource value, and the alternative solutions for evaluation and consideration. For this assignment, Stetson commits to repre senting the best interest of all the parties and stakeholders in the RBGC.

This proposal is valid for 90 days. Please do not hesitate to contact me, or Jeff Helsley, at 626-967-6202 if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you for this opportunity to assist with the development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan.

Sincerely,

Steve Johnson
President/CEO/CFO
Stetson Engineers Inc.

6.c
Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

PROPOSAL

RIALTO BASIN

GROUNDWATER COUNCIL

FOR

RIALTO BASIN

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

SUBMITTED TO:

BRIAN DICKENSON: CITY OF COLTON
TOM CROWLEY: CITY OF RIALTO
CRIS FEALY: FONTANA WATER COMPANY
VAN JEW: WEST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT

SEPTEMBER 29, 2021

6.c
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 2 Submitted: September 29, 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE NO.

1. BACKGROUND OF FIRM ............................................................................... 3

2. STATEMENT OF PROJECT UNDERSTANDING .................................................. 4

3. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ............................................................................ 5

4. QUALIFICATIONS ........................................................................................ 5

5. SCOPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED .......................................................... 7

6. REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 12

7. PROJECT SCHEDULE ............................................................................... 14

8. PROJECT COST ...................................................................................... 16

9. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY ......................................................................... 19

10. ACCEPTANCE OF AGREEMENT/INSURANCE PROVISIONS ............................ 19

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT A K EY STAFF RESUMES

ATTACHMENT B F EE SCHEDULE

ATTACHMENT C P ROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

A GREEMENT

6.c
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 3 Submitted: September 29, 2021

1. BACKGROUND OF FIRM

Integrating Engineering with
Water Resources for Over 60 Years

Stetson Engineers Inc. (Stetson) specializes in
management and development of water resources.

The firm consults to federal, state, and local
agencies; Native American Tribes; community
groups; and private clients throughout the western
United States.

Stetson specializes in all phases of water resources
engineering including groundwater basin
management; hydrogeological studies of
groundwater basins; groundwater flow modeling;
water well design and development; water system
evaluations; water facility design and construction
management for complete distribution systems,
pipelines, reservoir storage facilities, pumping
stations, and water treatment facilities; water quality evaluations; water distribution system hydraulic
modeling; water district engineering services;
financial planning and analysis; grant support
services; and project administration.

BUILDING ON EXCELLENCE

The firm was established by Thomas M. Stetson in
1957 as Thomas M. Stetson Civil and Consulting
Engineers. In 1977, the Company was incorporated
as Stetson Engineers Inc. Mr. Stetson’s handpicked
successors have maintained the founder’s focus on
quality services and long-term relationships with a
solid client base. We now staff offices in Covina,
Carlsbad, and San Rafael, California; Centennial,
Colorado; and Mesa, Arizona. For over six decades,
Stetson has provided creative solutions to water
resources issues, considering and applying state-of-
the-art or unique methods in addition to traditional
approaches. Stetson has moved to the forefront of
mid-sized consultants specializing in planning, water
resources, and problem solving. Stetson’s services
include the preparation of groundwater management
plans; watershed sanitary surveys; specifications,
construction drawings, and contract documents;
water system master plans; feasibility studies; water
supply evaluations; urban water management plans;
computer modeling of water systems and
groundwater basins; and grant and loan applications.

Municipal Engineering
 Watershed Sanitary Surveys
 Water Distribution System Design
 & Construction Mgmt.
 Water Distribution System Modeling
 Water System Master Plans
 Recycled Water Systems
 Storm Water System Analysis
 Water Treatment Facilities
 Wastewater Systems
Groundwater Resources
 Groundwater Modeling
 Watermaster Services
 Basin Investigations
 Groundwater Development
 Groundwater Management Plans
 Water Wells/Planning, Design, Construction
 Wellhead Protection Plans
 Artificial Recharge Studies
 Water Quality Assessments
 Safe Yield Studies
 Groundwater Cleanup and
 Aquifer Restoration
 Geophysical Surveys
Water Systems Management
 Economic Feasibility
 Operational Surveys
 Rate Design/Analysis
 System Appraisals and Valuations
Environmental Engineering
 Wetland/Riparian Hydrology
 Impact Analysis/Restoration
 Environmental Assessments and Impact
 Studies
 Geomorphic Analysis
 Fluvial Geomorphology
Water Rights
 Federal Reserved Water Rights Studies
 Basin and River Adjudications
 Water Right Valuations and Transfers
 Legal and Institutional Support
 Expert Witness Testimony
Surface Water Resources
 River Basin and Watershed Studies
 Natural Flow Determinations
 Reservoir Operations and System Modeling
 Hydropower Investigations

6.c
Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 4 Submitted: September 29, 2021

LOCATION AND CONTACT INFORMATION

Office Location and Address:
861 S Village Oaks Drive
Covina, CA 91724

Contact Person:

Jeff Helsley, P.E.

Phone: 626-967-6202
Email: [email protected]

2. STATEMENT OF PROJECT UNDERSTANDING

Water rights and groundwater extractions in the Rialto Basin have been historically contested, including a dispute that resulted in the 1961 Decree and more recently a settlement agreement reached in 2018. The Rialto Basin Groundwater Council (RBGC) was formed to coordinate and implement groundwater management activities throughout the Rialto Basin to preserve groundwater as an important water supply source.

The key to success will be to implement a coordinated strategy of extraction and recharge activities so groundwater levels in the Rialto Basin can be sustainably managed without overdraft conditions occurring. Using widely accepted water industry standards and relying on extensive, successful past experience in groundwater management, Stetson will develop a Groundwater Management Plan to ensure long-term groundwater sustainability in the Rialto Groundwater Basin with the goal of improving and mitigating low groundwater levels and other negative impacts. The Groundwater Management Plan will require an understanding of the basin hydrogeology and water budget, resulting in the establishment of management actions including extraction and replenishment protocols. It is anticipated San Bernardino Municipal Water District/Geoscience’s existing groundwater model of the basin will be a key tool for developing the plan.

Water supply reliability is increasingly important. Accordingly, a key issue related to implementing the Groundwater Management Plan will be ensuring the Groundwater Management Plan is sufficiently adaptive to ensure long-term applicability while efficiently maximizing all water supplies available and not causing stranded assets, including during periods of drought.

Additionally, the Groundwater Management Plan must utilize a cost effective and cooperative approach in order to respect the interests of all stakeholders which rely on the Rialto Basin for their water supply.

Stetson (Mr. Johnson) was retained by one of the parties to help resolve the legal and pumping disputes before settlement was reached in 2018. As part of this assignment, Stetson developed the framework for a regional groundwater management plan for all the parties. Stetson developed this management plan framework with a cooperative approach while considering the interests and concerns of all of all parties. Stetson would like to believe this work was instrumental in resolving the disputes and bringing together the current Rialto Basin Groundwater Council.

Stetson has been involved in the Rialto Basin and No Man’s Land for several decades and thoroughly understands the stakeholders, the positions taken, the 1961 Decree’s lack of clarity and ineffective provisions, the resource value, and the alternative solutions for evaluation and

6.c
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 5 Submitted: September 29, 2021
consideration. For this assignment, Stetson commits to representing the best interest of all the parties and stakeholders in the RBGC.

3. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

Stetson has in-depth local experience in the broad range of issues needed to successfully develop a groundwater management plan for the Rialto Basin Groundwater Council. Mr. Stephen B.

Johnson, P.E. will serve as Principal-in-Charge and Mr. Jeff D. Helsley, P.E. will serve as the main contact and Project Manager for the Groundwater Management Plan. Mr. Stephen Reich, P.G., C.H.G., P.E. will serve as the hydrogeologist. No subconsultants will be utilized for the development of the Plan. Stetson will coordinate with GeoScience regarding the transfer and use of the operating groundwater model of the Rialto Basin. An organizational chart of key personnel with names and titles is provided below.

4. QUALIFICATIONS

Stetson has decades of experience in groundwater management and has prepared and implemented numerous groundwater management plans for other basins. In addition, Stetson has direct previous experience with water rights and water supply issues in the region.

Consequently, Stetson’s Project Team possesses comprehensive capability for development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan. Stetson’s Project Team includes strong managers and experienced engineers with groundwater management experience.

Stetson is uniquely qualified to prepare this Groundwater Management Plan due to past experience providing ongoing litigation and mediation technical support regarding Rialto Basin management and operations prior to a settlement being reached. Stetson has had previous discussions with key parties regarding options and alternatives for sustainable groundwater management in the Rialto Basin, including developing the initial framework of the Groundwater Stephen Johnson, PE
Principal in ChargeJeff Helsley, PE
Project ManagerStephen Reich, PG, CHG, PE
HydrogeologistTom Ma, PhD, PE
Groundwater ModelerJenny Savron
Project EngineerHeather Steele, PE
Project EngineerNoah Wasserman
GIS SpecialistKaren Brunelle
Admin Support

6.c
Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 6 Submitted: September 29, 2021
Management Plan included in the Request for Proposals. Stetson also participated in the third- party review of the Geoscience groundwater model.

In addition to Stetson’s direct experience with the Rialto Basin, Stetson performs watermaster services for the Main San Gabriel Basin and the Raymond Basin. These services include establishing an annual operating safe yield, managing cyclic storage accounts of imported water for groundwater replenishment, and managing groundwater extractions. This relevant experience will directly contribute to the success of the Groundwater Management Plan for the Rialto Basin.

Resumes of the Project Team including pertinent experience, academic credentials, and professional certifications and memberships, are provided in Attachment A. Qualifications of key Stetson personnel for this Project are discussed below. Additional qualified Stetson support staff may also contribute to the development of the Groundwater Management Plan.

STEPHEN B. JOHNSON, P.E. PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Mr. Johnson, President and a Principal of Stetson Engineers Inc., is the Principal-in-Charge of the Covina office and has over 44 years of experience. Mr. Johnson supervises, directs or performs in a wide variety of projects. Mr. Johnson has been involved in a multitude of studies and projects and maintains close contact with all active clients, attending meetings regularly for the public clients. He has been involved in numerous supplemental water requirement studies, alternative water supply studies, groundwater management studies, and project feasibility studies. Mr. Johnson works directly as Engineer for the Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster, where he develops the operating safe yield recommendation every year, and as the Water Resources Manager for the Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Authority, where he was instrumental in developing the sustainable yield of the basin and the management actions that are being implemented.

JEFFREY D. HELSLEY, P.E. PROJECT MANAGER Mr. Helsley has over 39 years of experience in water resource management in Southern California. Mr. Helsley was formerly the District Engineer and Assistant General Manager of the Water Replenishment District of Southern California, where he was responsible for the development and implementation of programs to enhance groundwater recharge, improve groundwater basin management, and protect groundwater quality. Mr. Helsley has supervised the development of numerous groundwater management plans and has extensive experience in water supply projects with unique knowledge of water supply, water quality, and groundwater management issues. Mr. Helsley led Stetson’s technical team in the development of the Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Authority and the Alternative Groundwater Management Plan for the City of La Habra, and he advises the Morongo Band of Mission Indians on sustainable groundwater issues in the San Gorgonio Subbasin and the San Luis Rey Indian Water Authority on sustainable groundwater issues in the Upper San Luis Rey Groundwater Basin in San Diego County.

STEPHEN REICH, P.G., C.H.G., P.E. HYDROGEOLOGIST Mr. Reich is a geologist, hydrogeologist, and engineer with over 32 years of experience in water resource management. Mr. Reich has led technical teams for both litigation and settlement purposes for issues related to water supply, water quality, wastewater, and water rights disputes.

Mr. Reich has extensive knowledge of developing and managing large water projects in California and the southwestern U.S. His responsibilities have included developing basin management plans for groundwater and surface water resources in legally and environmentally constrained basins.

6.c
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 7 Submitted: September 29, 2021
TAINSHING (TOM) MA, PH.D., P.E. GROUNDWATER MODELER Mr. Ma has over 21 years of experience in groundwater management and numerical modeling.

He is experienced in MODFLOW groundwater flow models and has developed and calibrated flow models for multiple groundwater basins including the San Gabriel Basin and Anza-Terwilliger Basin.

JENNY SAVRON PROJECT ENGINEER Ms. Savron has over 18 years of experience in water resource engineering and has prepared numerous water supply studies and assessments. Ms. Savron has extensive knowledge of groundwater management and performs Watermaster support services for the Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster and Raymond Basin Management Board including preparing the annual Operating Safe Yield report.

HEATHER STEELE, P.E. PROJECT ENGINEER Ms. Steele has over 7 years of experience in water resources engineering and groundwater management. She has prepared multiple groundwater management plans including the Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Authority and the Alternative Groundwater Management Plan for the City of La Habra, in compliance with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.

NOAH WASSERMAN GIS SPECIALIST Mr. Wasserman has been involved in GIS mapping and spatial analysis, including map/figure production and layout, analysis of vector and raster data (including aerial images), data management, online mapping and data applications, etc. He has worked extensively on present/historic irrigation aerial photography interpretation and image georeferencing. Mr.

Wasserman is proficient in ArcGIS 10.2.2 and has received GIS Professional (GISP) certification.

KAREN BRUNELLE ADMIN SUPPORT Ms. Brunelle has over 14 years of experience and is responsible for the coordination and oversight of all administrative duties in Stetson’s Covina office.

5. SCOPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED

Stetson’s Project Team recognizes the critical need for comprehensive groundwater management in the Rialto Basin to sustain groundwater supplies for current and future beneficial uses. Mr. Jeff Helsley will be assigned as the Project Manager and will act as the primary contact. The section below is organized by Scope of Services, Deliverables, and Optional Work.

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Stetson will fulfill the following tasks as part of our Scope of Work to develop the Groundwater Management Plan:

Task 1 – Review RBGC Documents

Stetson is currently familiar with several important RBGC documents including the 2018 Settlement Agreement and 2019 Framework Agreement. In addition, Stetson is familiar with the 1961 Decree, Watermaster reports, and numerous other geological studies including DWR

6.c
Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 8 Submitted: September 29, 2021
bulletins, USGS reports, and other studies. Stetson will also do a literature review of other scientific and engineering studies conducted in the Basin.

Stetson staff will coordinate with RBGC TAC members and the Western-San Bernardino Watermaster to collect recent available hydrogeologic data from the Rialto Basin. Much of the historical data may have already been collected and used as part of the development of the groundwater model and Stetson’s prior work. This task is critical for comprehensive understanding of the historical understanding of the basin prior to developing the Groundwater Management Plan.

Task 2 – Develop Groundwater Management Plan

In accordance with the outline prepared by the RBGC Technical Advisory Committee (RBGC TAC) and included as Attachment 3 of the RFP (herein referred to as the “Outline”), Stetson will develop a comprehensive Groundwater Management Plan to be used as the management framework for the Rialto Basin. Stetson will utilize the Geoscience model and work with the RBGC TAC to analyze and develop the elements of the Groundwater Management Plan. The Groundwater Management Plan will follow the adopted outline unless otherwise approved or amended by the RBGC TAC. Individual sections will be provided to the RBGC TAC for review and input during the development of the Groundwater Management Plan. The subtasks required to develop the Groundwater Management Plan are discussed below.

Subtask 2a – Prepare Introduction Section

This section will introduce the Groundwater Management Plan and will provide relevant background and history. The purpose and goal of the Groundwater Management Plan will be stated. State laws, including the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), and their applicability to the Rialto Basin will be discussed.

Stetson will provide background on groundwater management activities in the Rialto Basin including summarizing the 1961 decree and the 2018 Settlement Agreement, and the history of the RBGC. The extent of the region covered under the Groundwater Management Plan and jurisdictions will be defined, as well as discussion regarding the inclusion of No Man’s Land in the Groundwater Management Plan. A list of definitions used in the report will also be provided.

The existing GeoScience calibrated numerical model of the Rialto Basin will be used to develop the Groundwater Management Plan. Relevant observations, findings, recommendations regarding the model will be documented and provided to the TAC. Up to a maximum of four model runs will be performed to simulate baseline conditions into the future and managed conditions.

Based upon a review of historical data, numerical model simulations, and potential implementation of basin management alternatives, the natural safe yield will be determined and a safe yield analysis will be conducted to determine whether an “Operating Safe Yield” or “Fixed Safe Yield” will best suit the Rialto Basin. The safe yield analysis will also include an evaluation of cyclic storage potential in the Rialto Basin for storage of pre-purchased imported water.

Currently, the Rialto Decree is based on a “Fixed Safe Yield” in that there is a limit to the quantity which can be produced each year. However, the Rialto Decree did not consider the potential impacts of replenishment with untreated imported water. An Operating Safe Yield would allow some flexibility to the amount that may be produced each year based on hydrology.

In addition, the model will be used to evaluate the current monitoring network to determine if a new index well regime is necessary, with groundwater levels at specific groundwater wells acting

6.c
Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 9 Submitted: September 29, 2021
as a proxy for determining the safe yield of the entire groundwater basin. The results of the evaluation from the model will be checked against historical water levels and extractions for verification. Existing and potential replenishment facilities will be evaluated to support groundwater replenishment with imported water.

It is recommended the analysis and studies conducted to fulfil the requirements of A.2.e. of the Outline (discussed in the preceding two paragraphs) be removed from the Introduction and instead discussed in the Decree section of the Groundwater Management Plan.

Subtask 2b – Prepare Decree Section

The Decree Section will include the declaration of current hydrologic and hydrogeologic conditions in the Rialto Basin. A hydrogeologic conceptual model will provide a written description and visual representation of the Rialto Basin. The numerical model will be used to determine water budget of all inflows, outflows, and groundwater in storage. The water budget will be used to evaluate if overdraft conditions exist or are likely to exist with projected pumping. The results of the Safe Yield analysis (discussed previously) will be presented. Groundwater rights will be summarized and documented.

As discussed previously, it is recommended the analyses of the safe yield, groundwater replenishment facilities, and the index well regime be included in this Section.

Subtask 2c – Prepare Violations and Remedies Section

Unsustainable conditions exist if excess production and/or inadequate natural replenishment of the Rialto Basin occurs, which will lead to undesirable results such as lowering of groundwater levels, loss of groundwater in storage, and degraded water quality (among other undesirable conditions). If left unmanaged, unsustainable conditions will ultimately lead to the loss of beneficial uses of the Rialto Basin.

This section will discuss undesirable results that are occurring or are likely to occur without sustainable management of the Rialto Basin. Violations to the Groundwater Management Plan will be discussed which may include excessive production, or disputes regarding the new index wells or credit for replenishment. Stetson will focus on remedies to violations resulting in excess production or inadequate replenishment that encourage or facilitate addressing the resulting impact of the violation and supporting the goals of the Groundwater Management Plan, such as fees for overproduction that may be used for replenishment water or other needed actions, which might include supporting demand management measures.

Stetson will evaluate demand management measures, including conservation practices, that would be feasible in the region to reduce reliance on groundwater from the Rialto Basin and potentially reduce the volume required to replenish the Rialto Basin. The task would include a review of all existing demand management measures implemented by entities with overlying land use jurisdiction over the Rialto Basin. Recommendations for basin-wide conservation practices will be provided.

Supplemental water options will be analyzed to document sources of supplemental water, availability of imported water and stormwater for groundwater replenishment, and physical, environmental, and legal constraints.

6.c
Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 10 Submitted: September 29, 2021
Subtask 2d – Prepare Management Committee Section

In this Section, the organization and duties of the Management Committee will be discussed including the following:
 Quantification and nomination of committee members
 Term of committee members
 Quorum requirements
 Committee organization including meeting schedule, document management of minutes, public participation requirements
 Powers and Duties including collecting data collection, managing groundwater production reports, administering assessments, and purchasing imported water

Stetson will provide recommendations and advisement to the RBGC and RBGC TAC members regarding experience with successful groundwater basin Management Committees. It is intended this Section will be prepared after coordination with the RBGC and RBGC TAC.

Subtask 2e – Prepare Groundwater Management Plan Tools Section

The management actions and functions of the RBGC will be discussed in this Section. These management actions will be the tools the RBGC will utilize to ensure the Rialto Basin is sustainably managed for long-term continued beneficial use.

In order to accurately monitor potential overdraft conditions, groundwater extractions will be reported to the RGBC. Similarly, the RBGC will maintain records of pumping rights to document any leases, purchases, and carryover of unused groundwater production rights.

The Groundwater Management Plan will document the process for preparing Annual Reports.

Annual Reports will include the following data:
 Groundwater Extractions
 Groundwater Levels
 Groundwater Replenishment/Recharge
 Status of the fulfillment of Settlement Agreement terms including the assessments and balance of required recharge

Current and proposed assessments will be discussed including proposed amount, term, and purpose. (It should be noted, assessments will likely be required to be adopted separately from the Groundwater Management Plan.)

It is anticipated, the water budget and safe yield analysis will determine that supplemental water will be required in the Rialto Basin for sustainable management of groundwater levels.

Consequently, this Section will also include the protocols for procuring supplemental water for groundwater replenishment as wells and the management and maintenance of recharge facilities for long-term viability. The protocols for banking water will also be discussed in the Section.

Additional management actions may be included in the Groundwater Management Plan, as approved by the RBGC TAC, depending on the results of the analyses conducted as part of the development of the Decree Section and the results of the numerical modeling simulations. For example, the adoption of conservation policies and the implementation of cyclic storage accounts may be recommended as management tools.

6.c
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 11 Submitted: September 29, 2021
Subtask 2f – Prepare Other Considerations Section

Stetson will coordinate with the RBGC TAC to document other requirements as noted in the Outline including contractual and legal statements regarding the term of the Groundwater Management Plan and the relationship with the Settlement Agreement.

Task 3 – Project Management

Stetson will perform project management duties for the development of the Groundwater Management Plan including, but not limited to, coordination with staff and RBGC TAC representatives via the following:
 Emails
 Telephone Calls
 Zoom Meetings
 In-Person Meetings (if directed and authorized)

Task 4 – Attend Meetings

Stetson will attend as-needed Zoom meetings with the RBGC TAC for the following purposes:
 Coordinate with TAC members on management tools and modeling results  Provide updates to TAC members regarding status and progress of Groundwater Management Plan
 Discuss technical challenges that may arise during the preparation of the Groundwater Management Plan and possible solutions
 Discuss comments on the review draft of the Groundwater Management Plan before finalizing the report

In addition, Stetson will attend one RBGC meeting to present the Groundwater Management Plan to the council and members of the public.

If selected, it is recommended that Stetson attend a kick-off meeting to formally introduce the project. Understanding there is a court adjudication in place that is not acceptable to all Stakeholders, as part of Stetson’s first work assignment, it is proposed to conduct an initial assessment of each parties’ issues, needs, and positions to implement a successful Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan. The initial task should help set up the framework for the initial draft Groundwater Management Plan.

LIST OF DELIVERABLES

The following is a list of deliverables for the development of the Groundwater Management Plan:

 Summary of Review and Recommendations for Groundwater Numerical Model (if required)
 Groundwater Management Plan Final Detailed Outline
 Review Draft Groundwater Management Plan
 Final Groundwater Management Plan (including applicable figures, tables, and appendices)

6.c
Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 12 Submitted: September 29, 2021
 PowerPoint Presentation for the RBGC Council

Depending on authorization of any optional work discussed below, additional deliverables may be required.

OPTIONAL WORK

Optional Task 1: Stakeholder and Legal Coordination and Engagement

Stetson will coordinate with RBGC TAC members regarding stakeholder engagement and outreach during the preparation of the Groundwater Management Plan in order to inform the public and receive public input. Stetson will prepare outreach materials with technical content, as necessary, that could include the following:
 Presentations
 Fact Sheets
 Responses to Comments/Questions
 Frequently Asked Questions
 Other Outreach Materials

Additionally, Stetson will coordinate with legal counsel on the legal implications of the Groundwater Management Plan and legal requirements for implementation.

Optional Task 2: Data Gap Evaluation

Hydrogeological data sets available for the Rialto Basin will be reviewed for completeness and compliance and analyzed for data gaps, including monitoring locations and frequency of measurements. The water level and water quality monitoring programs will be reviewed.

Additionally, the potential need for and proposed location for additional aquifer performance tests will be analyzed. Stetson will make recommendations for improving and modifying the existing monitoring network, if necessary. A Technical Memorandum summarizing the data gaps and steps required to fill the gaps and achieve a better understanding of the basin will be prepared.

6. REFERENCES

Stetson has prepared numerous groundwater studies and groundwater management plans including the development and utilization of groundwater flow models. Provided below are five references in relation Stetson’s groundwater management expertise:

1. Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Authority
Mr. Keith Lemieux, General Counsel
500 West Ridgecrest Boulevard
Ridgecrest, CA 93555
Phone: 805-764-5452
Email: [email protected]

6.c
Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 13 Submitted: September 29, 2021
Project(s) Description: Preparation and implementation of a comprehensive Groundwater Sustainability Plan in compliance with SGMA. Preparation of Annual Groundwater Reports.

Contract Duration: 2017 - Current
Contract Value: Current annual budget is approximately $1,600,000.

2. Main San Gabriel Valley Watermaster
Mr. Tony Zampiello
725 N Azusa Avenue
Azusa, CA 91702
Phone: 626-815-1300
Email: [email protected]

Project(s) Description: Development and implementation of the groundwater management structure for the adjudicated San Gabriel Groundwater Basin. Development of a Salt and Nutrient Management Plan. Development of Operating Safe Yield Annual Reports.

Contract Duration: 1973 - Current
Contract Value: Current annual budget is approximately $1,100,000.

3. City of La Habra
Mr. Elias Saykali
621 W Lambert Road
La Habra, CA 90631
Phone: 562-383-4170
Email: [email protected]

Project(s) Description: Preparation of a Groundwater Management Plan for the La Habra Groundwater Basin. Preparation of an Alternative Groundwater Sustainability Plan and Annual Groundwater Reports in compliance with SGMA.

Contract Duration: 2013 to Current
Contract Value: Current budget of approximately $43,000 for updating the Alternative Groundwater Sustainability Plan.

4. San Luis Rey Indian Water Authority
Mr. Bob Pelcyger, Special Counsel
PO Box 428
Pauma Valley, CA 92061
Phone: 760-742-1903
Email: [email protected]

Project(s) Description: Advisement on sustainable groundwater management issues.

Support of water rights litigation settlement negotiations and, subsequently, support of implementation of the settlement.

Contract Duration: 2001-Current
Contract Value: Current annual budget is approximately $182,000.

5. Morongo Band of Mission Indians
Mr. John Covington
47350 Foothill Road

6.c
Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 14 Submitted: September 29, 2021
Banning, CA 92220
Phone: 951-755-5270
Email: [email protected]

Project(s) Description: Advisement on sustainable groundwater management issues.

Developed various water resource, groundwater, and water rights reports.

Contract Duration: 2016-2019
Contract Value: Approximately $185,000.

7. PROJECT SCHEDULE

Stetson’s proposed Project Schedule for the Groundwater Management Plan can be found on the following page.

As part of the preliminary project schedule, Stetson has assumed a starting date of November 15, 2021 and that a draft Groundwater Management Plan will be provided to the RBGC TAC in December 2022. (These dates are provided for planning purposes and are intended to be finalized at the kick-off meeting.) The proposed project schedule is based on Stetson’s past experience with preparing Groundwater Management Plans for other agencies. Schedule milestones may be modified if agreed upon with the RBGC TAC.

6.c
Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) ID Task Name Start Finish
0 Develop Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan Mon 11/15/21Fri 3/10/23 1 Kick Off Coordination Meeting Mon 11/15/21 Mon 11/15/21 2 Task 1: Review Existing Documents Mon 11/15/21 Mon 2/14/22 3 Task 2: Develop Groundwater Management Plan Tue 2/15/22 Fri 3/10/23 4 Develop Introduction Section (Including Modeling and Safe Yield Analyses) Tue 2/15/22 Fri 7/29/22 5 Develop Decree Section Tue 2/15/22 Fri 7/29/22
6 Develop Violations/Remedies Section Mon 8/1/22 Wed 9/28/22 7 Develop Management Committee Section Thu 9/29/22 Mon 10/31/22 8 Develop Management Tools Section Thu 9/29/22 Wed 11/30/22 9 Develop Other Considerations Section Thu 9/29/22 Mon 10/31/22 10 Prepare Complete Draft Groundwater Management Plan Thu 12/1/22 Fri 12/23/22 11 Provide Draft Groundwater Management Plan to RBGC TAC for Review Fri 12/23/22 Fri 12/23/22 12 RBGC TAC Review Mon 12/26/22 Mon 1/23/23
13 Incorporate TAC comments and finalize Draft Tue 1/24/23 Fri 3/10/23 14 Submit Final Groundwater Management Plan Fri 3/10/23 Fri 3/10/23 15 Task 3: Project Management Mon 11/15/21 Fri 3/10/23
16 Task 4: Attend Meetings Mon 11/15/21 Fri 3/10/23
17 Optional Task 1: Stakeholder and Legal Coordination and Engagement Tue 2/15/22 Fri 3/10/23 18 Optional Task 2: Data Gap Evaluation Mon 3/14/22 Fri 7/29/22 11/15
12/23
3/10
2021 2022 2023
Task
Critical Task
Milestone
Summary
Rolled Up Task
Rolled Up Critical Task
Rolled Up Milestone
Rolled Up Progress
Split
External Tasks
Project Summary
Group By Summary
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Critical
Critical Split
Baseline
Baseline Milestone
Baseline Summary
Progress
Deadline

RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL
Preliminary Groundwater Management Plan Schedule
September 29, 2021

Page 1 ends

Notes:

Schedule subject to change pending
consultation with RBGC TAC.

6.c
Packet Pg. 336
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 16 Submitted: September 29, 2021

8. PROJECT COST

Stetson’s standard current fee schedule is provided in Attachment B. The fee schedule includes hourly rate for each personnel category, and any other additional charges to complete the services of this project. A detailed cost estimate by personnel classification and hours for each of the four main tasks plus additional optional work is provided below. Additionally, a cost estimate breakdown of Task 2 (Develop Groundwater Management Plan) is provided.

6.c
Packet Pg. 337
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) $176,600
$21,100

Staff Name Role Hourly Rate Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Subtotal: Hrs Subtotal: Cost Stephen B. JohnsonProject Principal 237 3 $711 68 $16,116 16 $3,792 18 $4,266 10 $2,370 3 $711 118 $27,966 Jeff Helsley Project Manager 206 6 $1,236 108 $22,248 22 $4,532 20 $4,120 12 $2,472 10 $2,060 178 $36,668 Steve Reich Hydrogeologist 237 2 $474 30 $7,110 0 $0 5 $1,185 0 $0 5 $1,185 42 $9,954 Tom Ma Groundwater Modeler 191 0 $0 192 $36,672 12 $2,292 0 $0 5 $955 5 $955 214 $40,874 Jenny Savron Project Engineer 149 6 $894 121 $18,029 12 $1,788 12 $1,788 10 $1,490 15 $2,235 176 $26,224 Heather Steele Project Engineer 128 12 $1,536 234 $29,952 30 $3,840 30 $3,840 20 $2,560 20 $2,560 346 $44,288 Noah Wasserman GIS Manager 122 0 $0 30 $3,660 0 $0 0 $0 3 $366 0 $0 33 $4,026 Administrative Staff 111 0 $0 35 $3,885 10 $1,110 8 $888 5 $555 3 $333 61 $6,771 Subtotal $4,851 $137,672 $17,354 $16,087 $10,768 $10,039 $196,771 Labor Total $196,771
Expenses* $0 $400 $200 $0 $200 $0 $800Expense Total
$800
Total 29 $4,851 818 $138,072 102 $17,554 93 $16,087 65 $10,968 61 $10,039 $197,571 Grand Total
$197,600
Notes:
* Reimbursable expenses include reproduction costs, mileage, computer charges, telephone and other expenses billed at cost on Fee Schedule.

Task 2
STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

PROJECT BUDGET AND STAFF ALLOCATION

RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

STETSON PROPOSAL
Required Tasks
Optional Tasks Groundwater Management Plan Overall Budget Required Tasks Optional Tasks
Totals
Task 1
Develop
Groundwater
Management Plan
Task 4 Optional Task 1
Review of
Documents Meetings
Stakeholder and
Legal Coordination
and Engagement
Task 3
Project
Management
Optional Task 2
Data Gap Evaluation

6.c
Packet Pg. 338
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) $138,100

Staff Name Role Hourly Rate Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Subtotal: Hrs Subtotal: Cost Stephen B. JohnsonProject Principal 237 30 $7,110 10 $2,370 8 $1,896 10 $2,370 10 $2,370 0 $0 68 $16,116 Jeff Helsley Project Manager 206 40 $8,240 13 $2,678 12 $2,472 20 $4,120 15 $3,090 8 $1,648 108 $22,248 Steve Reich Hydrogeologist 237 18 $4,266 8 $1,896 4 $948 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 30 $7,110 Tom Ma Groundwater Modeler 191 165 $31,515 15 $2,865 12 $2,292 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 192 $36,672 Jenny Savron Project Engineer 149 45 $6,705 15 $2,235 14 $2,086 12 $1,788 25 $3,725 10 $1,490 121 $18,029 Heather Steele Project Engineer 128 90 $11,520 22 $2,816 32 $4,096 35 $4,480 40 $5,120 15 $1,920 234 $29,952 Noah WassermanGIS Manager 122 0 $0 30 $3,660 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 30 $3,660 Administrative Staff 111 0 $0 10 $1,110 10 $1,110 10 $1,110 5 $555 0 $0 35 $3,885 Subtotal $69,356 $19,630 $14,900 $13,868 $14,860 $5,058 $137,672 Labor Total $137,672
Expenses* $0 $200 $200 $0 $0 $0 $400Expense Total
$400
Total 388 $69,356 123 $19,830 92 $15,100 87 $13,868 95 $14,860 33 $5,058 $138,072 Grand Total
$138,100
Notes:
* Reimbursable expenses include reproduction costs, mileage, computer charges, telephone and other expenses billed at cost on Fee Schedule. ** Per the Outline, modeling and analyses are included in the Introduction. It is recommended that these elements be removed from the Introduction and instead be included in the Decree Section. It is assumed the model will be used to simulate baseline conditions and three additional modeling scenarios.

Other Considerations Totals
Introduction**
(Including Modeling,
Safe Yield Analysis,
Recharge Areas,
Cyclic Storage)
Decree (Hydrologic
Conditions, Water
Rights)
Violations /
Remedies
(Supplemental
Water,
Conservation)
Management
Committee
Management Plan
Tools
Task 2:

Task 2: Groundwater Management Plan Budget Breakdown
Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6

STETSON PROPOSAL
STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

PROJECT BUDGET AND STAFF ALLOCATION

RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

6.c
Packet Pg. 339
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan 19 Submitted: September 29, 2021

9. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY

If selected, Steve Johnson, President of Stetson Engineers Inc, will be the authorized signatory to execute the professional services agreement. This proposal is valid for 90 days.

10. ACCEPTANCE OF AGREEMENT/INSURANCE PROVISIONS

Stetson’s proposed modifications to the professional services agreement and insurance provisions are provided in Attachment C.

6.c
Packet Pg. 340
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan

Submitted: September 29, 2021

ATTACHMENT A

RESUMES

6.c
Packet Pg. 341
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 1 of 6
1_Steve Johnson-Box21

RESUMES
Name & Title:

Steve Johnson, P.E., Corporate President/CEO and
Managing Principal
Project Assignment:

Principal Engineer
Years of Experience with Firm
44 Years of Experience With Other Firms
0 Education: Degree(s) / Year / Specialization:

B.S. Civil Engineering / 1977 / California Polytechnic
University, Pomona
Registrations / Certifications:

Civil Engineer No. 32396, California 1981
Experience Record
Mr. Johnson is Corporate President/CEO and Managing Principal of the Covina office of Stetson Engineers . Mr.

Johnson is responsible for all engineering operations performed by the firm’s southern California office, in Covina, California. Mr. Johnson’s extremely broad experience covers the southern California work for well over a quarter century. As a Man aging Principal, Mr. Johnson is responsible for all corporate management functions and professional engineering support services. Mr. Johnson has represented Stetson for over 40 years, continuous.

Mr. Johnson is a designated expert for purposes of water s ystem and water rights evaluation and appraisal. This includes qualification in U.S. Federal Court as an expert under the Daubert rules of qualification. He has provided expert witness testimony on water system/water rights condemnation actions, groundwa ter contamination cases, and flood damage evaluations and assessments. Mr. Johnson’s expertise has supported numerous water systems and water rights transactions and settlements. He has also provided expert witness testimony of the impacts and decision -making associated with water supply contamination, before the California Public Utilities Commission, Administration Law Judge.

Mr. Johnson is the designated “Project Engineer” for implementing cleanup of the largest groundwater contamination site in the na tion, under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund Program. Under this assignment, Mr. Johnson coordinates with the U.S. EPA, six different water purveyors, the Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster, the San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authorit y, and numerous Responsible Parties and their engineering/legal representatives. This assignment has a current value of $250 to $300 million and will produce over 35,000 acre-feet of treated, potable groundwater annually. Mr. Johnson’s responsibilities i nclude all phases of project planning, financing, coordination, regulatory compliance, design, contract solicitation, construction management, operations, and performance monitoring for contamination plume control and cleanup.

As a predecessor to this assi gnment, Mr. Johnson supervised the planning, design, construction, operations, and regulatory approval of the first groundwater treatment facility in the United States to successfully treat for Perchlorate and NDMA for potable consumption. This facility w as also the first groundwater treatment facility to be permitted for drinking water supply under the California Department of Health Services Policy 97 -005 for impaired water supplies.

Mr. Johnson represents several prominent water agencies as “Engineer” or “Water Resources Ma nager”. These agencies include the Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster, the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, the San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, the Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Authority, and the San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority. Typical assignments include safe y ield studies, groundwater contamination characterization and remediation, design, construction management, rate assessment, water supply studies, and reports to the board.

Since th e early 1980s, Mr. Johnson has been heavily involved with engineering soluti ons to contamination of drinking water supplies. This work involves a wide range of experience and expertise, including site and regional characterization of soil and groundwater contamination, hydrogeologic studies, groundwater basin modeling, development of cleanup and water supply plans, remediation studies, development and full implementation of treatment projects, and coordination with all regulatory agencies. The contaminant s of concern include volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Perchlorate, NDMA, 1 -4-dioxane, Chromium and others. This work has been performed in full cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the State Department of Toxic Substance Control, t he Department of Health Services, the State Water Resources Control Board, a nd the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

6.c
Packet Pg. 342
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 2 of 6
1_Steve Johnson-Box21

RESUMES

Steve Johnson, Principal Engineer
(Continued)
The following projects are representative of Mr. Johnson's experience:

City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power. Supplemental Water Study.

City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power. Hoover Dam Power Contracts.

Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District
• Supervision of District Engineering Duties
• Area Wide Water Quality Monitoring Plan
• AB 1803 Water Quality Monitoring Plan
• AB 797 Water Conservation Plan
• Feasibility Studies - Use of Reclaimed Water
• Supervision of EPA Superfund Sub-Contract
• Drought Studies
• Puente Hills Landfill Investigation
• District Mapping
• Reclaimed Water Study
• Direct Use Project
• Indirect Reuse Replenishment Project
San Gabriel River Watermaster. Named one of the three Watermasters in 2011 Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Authority.
• Supervision of Water Resources Manager Duties
• Development and Implementation of Groundwater Sustainability Plan City of Bakersfield
• Design of Turnout Structure - Kern River
• Design of Turnout Structure - Canal
• Water System Master Plan
• Review of New Development Plans
• Design of Box Culvert
• Acquisition of New Facilities
• Water System Operations Study
Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District
• Design of Reservoir Renovation
• Design of Lake Cachuma Intake Facility
• Design of Well Fields (6.0 cfs, 4.0 cfs and 1.73 cfs) • Design of Booster Station

6.c
Packet Pg. 343
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 3 of 6
1_Steve Johnson-Box21

RESUMES
Steve Johnson, Principal Engineer
(Continued)
• Administration of State Loan and Grant
• Supervision of Cathodic Protection
• Design of Well No. 15 Pumping Equipment
• Lake Cachuma Intake Maintenance
• Zone III Reservoir Design
• Cachuma Pipeline Rehabilitation
• SWP Facilities Design
East Pasadena Water Company Design of Water Main Extensions for Fire Service.

Kaiser Steel Valuation of Water Related Holdings at Fontana Plant.

City of Solvang
• Design of Wells No. 7 and 8 Water Supply
San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District
• Feasibility Study Hydroelectric Generation Stations
• Continuing Developer Interaction Responsibilities
• Supervision of Periodic Pipeline As-Built Updates
• Feasibility Study and Acquisition for Turnout Structure • Transmission Pipeline Rehabilitation Project
• State Water Project Entitlement Report
• Urban Water Management Plans
• Pipeline Extension Project
City of Industry Master Plan of Development
Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster
• Supervision of Engineering Duties
• Basin Water Quality Studies
• Basin Modeling
• Enforcement of Pumping Control
• Operable Unit Cleanup Plans
• BPOU Cleanup Project
• Full Compliance Permitting
Puente Basin Watermaster Supervision of Engineering Duties Buellton Community Services District
• Water System Design
• Sewer System Design
City of Torrance Feasibility Study on Hydroelectric Generation

6.c
Packet Pg. 344
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 4 of 6
1_Steve Johnson-Box21

RESUMES
Steve Johnson, Principal Engineer
(Continued)
Mr. Riley Metz Site Drainage Study and Improvement
Mr. Redmond Flood Damage Study
Boy Scouts of America Flood Damage Study
Rapid Transit District Waste Discharge Study
Mr. Lapin Flood Damage Study
U.S. Department of Navy, Camp Pendleton
• Water System Study
• Water System Design
City of Claremont Representative on Proposed Quarry Development Cabazon Water Company Valuation Study
HLM Water System Valuation Study
Citizens Utilities Company Valuation of Jackson Water Works County of San Bernardino Safe Yield Study
Walsh v. State of California Flood Damage Study
Three Valleys Municipal Water District Subagency Report Morongo Band of Mission Indians Ongoing Engineering Studies La Quinta Water System Valuation Study
City of Ontario Flood Damage Study
Serrano Park Homeowners Association Flood Plain Improvements California Department of Fish and Game Valuation of Water Rights at Indian Joe Spring Sunnymead Ranch Lake Reconstruction
City of Livermore and California Water Service Trade of Service Areas – Arbitration Sparkletts Water Water Supply Study
Cancun Racquet Club Subsidence Evaluation
East Highlands Ranch Water Rights and Consultation Work Covina Irrigating Company Valuation
Hartman Farms (Ohio) Coordination of basin recharge with rock and sand operations Turner Ranches Valuation of Sanitary System
City of Barstow
• Water Rights
• Mohave River Water Quality Evaluations
• Contaminant Investigations
City of Glendora Conjunctive Use Study

6.c
Packet Pg. 345
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 5 of 6
1_Steve Johnson-Box21

RESUMES
Steve Johnson, Principal Engineer
(Continued)
Lewis Homes Management Corp Water Resources and Supply Studies City of Oceanside Water Resources Study
City of Upland Water Rights Evaluation
San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority
• Consulting Services
• Arrow Well Project
• Big Dalton Project
• Monrovia Project
City of Bullhead City, Wastewater Treatment Plant Evaluation Azusa Valley Water Company Valuation
American Water Works. Well Design
City of Covina. Valuation of Covina Irrigating Company Suburban Water Systems. Valuation of Facilities
City of Whittier Urban Water Plans
Lewis Homes, Monrovia Nursery Water Resources
Beverly Acres Mutual Water User's Association Valuation Southern California Water Company, Staff Projects
City of Oceanside - Water Resources Study
Prado Dam Flood Damage - Perrizo
Chino Basin Watermaster - Engineering
Santa Margarita Water District - Appraisal
San Gabriel Valley Water Co. v. Sanitation Districts
Tri-Cities/Camp Pendleton - Economic Evaluation of Conjunctive Use Water Supply Project Three Valleys Water District - General Engineering
San Gabriel River Water Committee - General Engineering City of Beverly Hills - Water Distribution System Analysis Valley County Water District - Urban Water Management Plan Valley County Water District - General Engineering
Montebello Land and Water Company
City of Oceanside - Water Rights and System Modeling
City of Oxnard - Water Quality
Raymond Basin - Perchlorate Study
Star Kist Foods - Water Rights Evaluation
Orange County Water District - Prado Basin Constructed Wetlands East Highlands Ranch - Water Supply

6.c
Packet Pg. 346
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 6 of 6
1_Steve Johnson-Box21

RESUMES
Steve Johnson, Principal Engineer
(Continued)
Elsinore Water District Well Interference
City of Perris
LPVCWD Perchlorate/NDMA Facility
Tejon Ranch Water/Sanitation
City of San Diego Studies
DHS Permitting - Policy 97-005
SEMOU Cleanup Plans
SCWC SEMOU Water
San Jacinto-Hemet Groundwater Management Plan
Baldwin Park Operable Unit – Groundwater Cleanup Project San Gabriel Valley Water Company (SGVWC) – General Rate Case Fi ling Before the Public U tilities Commission for SGVWC’s Fontana Water Company Division
People vs. Rosemead
CalTrans vs. San Antonio Lakes Partners, et al.

State of New Mexico, et al. vs. General Electric company American States Water Company et al. vs. State of California et al., & Aerojet-General Corporation, et al.

Suburban Water Systems Rate Case before the Public Utilities Commission Paulus Engineering, Inc. vs. Ridge Development, LLC
Summit Water Holdings, LLC/Harper Lake Basin
Villages of Avalon Community Association vs. Perris Public Utility Authority People of the State of California and the City of San Diego vs. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners Tahoe City Public Utility Districts vs. Tahoe Park Water Company; Lake Forest Water Company

6.c
Packet Pg. 347
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 1 of 3
2_Jeff Helsley Box 21
RESUME
Name & Title:

Jeff Helsley, P.E., Supervising Engineer
Project Assignment:

Project Manager
Years of Experience with Firm
22 Years of Experience With Other Firms
17 Education: Degree(s) / Year / Specialization:

M.S. Environmental Engineering / 1982 / University of
Southern California, Los Angeles (USC)
B.S. Civil Engineering / 1981 / California State University, Los Angeles (CSULA)
Registrations / Certifications:

Civil Engineer No. 039599, California, 1985
Experience Record
Mr. Helsley joined Stetson Engineers, Inc. in 1999 as project manager for water rights quantification and valuation studies, alternative water supply studies, water resource management studies, water facilities design including site improvements for drainage and access , and groundwater recharge feasibility studies including sand and gravel pits in the San Gabriel Valley.

His experience includes employment with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works in the Hydraulic/Water Conservation Division. As a Supervising Civil Engineer I in the Planning Unit, he was responsible for studies to develop improvements to the County’s injection barriers to prevent seawater intrusion, and studies of groundwater recharge optimization.

Mr. Helsley was also formerly the District Engineer and Assi stant General Manager of the Water Replenishment District of Southern California, where he was responsible for the development and implementation of programs to enhance groundwater recharge, improve groundwater basin management, and protect groundwater qua lity.

Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Authority Groundwater Sustainability Plan Chino Pipeline and Facilities Improvements Project

• Well-site review, permitting and design including a drainage study and retention basin design • Well construction oversight
• Pump testing and station design
• Nitrate Removal Treatment Plant Design
• Design for three separate pipelines
• Assistance in pipeline permitting
• Preparation of specifications and bid documents
San Luis Rey Indian Water Rights Dispute, San Diego County Antelope Valley Groundwater Recharge and Recovery Study San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District 30” Pipeline Realignment City of Pomona Water Pipeline Replacement Design
Water Supply Assessments

• The Shops at Santa Anita, Arcadia, California
• Copa de Oro Development, Rosemond, California
• Newhall County Water District, Santa Clarita Valley, California • Uptown Specific Plan, Whittier, California
• Monrovia Nursery, Azusa/Glendora, California
• West Main Street Master Plan, Alhambra, California
• Valley Vision Specific Plan, San Gabriel, California

6.c
Packet Pg. 348
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 2 of 3
2_Jeff Helsley Box 21
RESUME

Jeff Helsley, Project Engineer
(Continued)
City of Monterey Park Perchlorate Treatment System Procurement City of Glendale Wellhead Treatment Feasibility Study and Design Wellhead Treatment Systems – San Marino Service Area, Feasibility and Options Analysis Report Water System Master Plans
• City of Covina
• Pahrump, Nevada, included the Water System, the Sewage Collection System and Lift Stations • Fontana Water Company
• San Gabriel Valley Water Company, Los Angeles County Division City of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Development Project Review of Recycled Water Use, Forest Hills Memorial Park, Covina Hills Water Supply Feasibility Studies
• Sierra Bella Development, Lucerne Valley, California
• Sierra Lakes Development, Santa Clarita Valley, California • Rolling Meadows Development, Tejon Ranch, California
• East Highlands Ranch, Upland, California
• Larsen Ranch, Antelope Valley, California
East Raymond Basin Water Resources Plan
Rancho Cordova Perchlorate Contamination Litigation Support Groundwater Supply Development Cost Study, Laredo, Texas Groundwater Yield Review, Burleson County, Texas
Wrightwood Groundwater Study
Rincon Groundwater Study
Torrez Martinez Water Feasibility Study
Spring Creek Booster Station Design
Water Rights Appraisal – Hearst Ranch
Antelope Valley Water Rights Adjudication
LAFCO Municipal Water Service Review, Santa Clarita Valley Review of Proposal Antelope Valley Water Bank
Arrow Well Wellhead Treatment Design
Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) Alamitos Barrier Project - Seawater Barrier • Deficiency/Feasibility Study
• Injection Well Design
• Injection Well Construction
LACDPW Dominguez Gap Barrier - Seawater Barrier, Deficiency/Feasibility Study

6.c
Packet Pg. 349
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 3 of 3
2_Jeff Helsley Box 21
RESUME
Jeff Helsley, Project Engineer
(Continued)
LACDPW West Coast Barrier Project - Seawater Barrier
• Geophysical Exploration
• Deficiency/Feasibility Study
Landfill Gas Mitigation Measures
County Solid Waste Management Plan
Montebello Forebay Groundwater Recharge Study
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Modifications Injection Well Maintenance Study

6.c
Packet Pg. 350
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 1 of 4
3_STEPHEN REICH CV4(2021)

RESUMES
Name & Title:

Stephen Reich, Principal
Project Assignment:

Hydrogeologist
Years of Experience with Firm:
30 Years of Experience with Other Firms:
2 Education: Degree(s) / Year / Specialization:

M.S. / 1989 / Geophysical Engineering,
Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado
B.S. / 1985 / Geophysical Engineering,
Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado
Registrations / Certifications:

Civil Engineer No.C58713, California
Professional Geologist No. 9712, California
Certified Hydrogeologist No. 1085, California
Experience Record
Mr. Reich provides technical and administrative expertise required to manage multi-faceted water resource projects that require in-depth knowledge of water rights, environmental requirements, regulatory issue s, and civil engineering solutions. Mr. Reich has led technical teams for both litigation and settlement purposes for issues related to water supply, water quality, wastewater, and water rights disputes. His responsibilities have included developing basin management plans for groundwater and surface water resources in legally and environmenta lly constrained basins. In 2017, Mr. Reich developed a comprehensive adaptive management plan that met the requirements of the project proponents, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and other state and local regulators. The plan was developed through extensive consultation with various organizations through the NEPA and ESA Section 7 consultation process over a period of 3 years.

Quantitative threshold values were established for various triggers so pre-established mitigation measures would be implemented, if necessary. The result of his effort is a geographical web-based system that provides database management and decision-making processes tied to meeting physical, environmental, and legal constraints.

Monthly reports are currently being assimilated into annual reports to assure constraints identified in two Biological Opinions for the project are met, as well as meeting state water rights reporting requirements. Similarly, in 2015 and 2016, Mr. Reich led the City of San Juan Capistrano in developing a Groundwater Management Plan to balance the use of their surface and groundwater resources while meeting environmental and physical constraints. Results from his efforts are used to meet state regulatory requirements for monitoring and reporting.

As sole arbitrator between LADWP and Inyo County, regarding groundwater pumping in Owens Valley, Mr. Reich balanced legal, physical, and environmental requirements to settle a pumping dispute between Inyo County and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Mr. Reich currently leading a team of engineers and biologists to determine in-stream flow requirements for southern Steelhead in southern California; the result which will be used as a basis of designing and operating a federal project. His expertise in hydrology, water quality, geomorphology, civil engineering, economics, state and federal water supply issues, and enviro nmental concerns provides a wide range of experience for the successful completion of both small and large scale water development projects.

Mr. Reich has extensive knowledge of developing and managing large water projects in California and the southwestern U.S. Working with federal and local water agencies, he has participated in developing large water supply projects. Mr. Reich also brings experience in working with regulators and federal agencies in developing water supply projects that satisfy U.S. Fish and Wildlife, National Marines Fisheries Service, Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and RWQCB basin management requirements.

Stetson Engineers Inc.

Conjunctive Use Groundwater Project
As lead engineer, designer, and project manager for a $52 million project, Mr. Reich developed a conjunctive use project, based on MODFLOW groundwater model, which utilizes surface flow during winter-time rainfall events to recharge a groundwater aquifer for subsequent extraction during peak summer demand months. Mr.

Reich was responsible for the design of the diversion facility, conveyance systems, and recharge facilities to divert water from the Santa Margarita River. Mr. Reich oversaw the development of field investigations, including the construction of monitoring and production wells, to support the creation of a numerical groundwater model. Working with the Bureau of Reclamation and the United States Navy, Mr. Reich played a key role in the development of legislative approval of the project passed by the United States congress in public law PL 111-11 to support settlement of U.S. v Fallbrook PUD et al.

6.c
Packet Pg. 351
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 2 of 4
3_STEPHEN REICH CV4(2021)

RESUMES
Stephen Reich, Principal
(Continued)
As author and project manager, directed all engineering, hydrologic, hydrogeologic, env ironmental tasks involved in the completion of the Santa Margarita River Recharge and Recovery Enhancement Program. This project combined the complex engineering and environmental studies required to maximize the ground -water production from a ground-water basin without harming the 16 endangered species that live within the riparian corridor and associated estuary of the Santa Margarita River. He recently participated in the completion of the environmental documentation and issuance of the Record of Decision associated with this project.

Basin Management
Mr. Reich has developed and implemented basin management and adaptive management programs for multiple basins located throughout California and the southwest U.S. His responsibilities included working with various federal and non-federal stakeholders to establish goals and project constraints. Between 2010 and 2015, Mr.

Reich developed a sustainable yield model for the Temecula Groundwater Basin that met streamflow and groundwater constraints. Mr. Reich has performed sustainable yield studies in the Santa Margarita Basin to meet operational, legal, and environmental requirements for various clients so operating criteria can be established. His duties included establishing pumping schedules, identifying monitoring requirements, developing web-based databases, and producing monthly and annual reports to meet environmental and legal requirements.

Water Rights Negotiations
Technical lead for the United States and the Marine Corps Camp Pendleton in the sett lement of one of the longest running (90+ years) water rights disputes in California. Using technical studies prepared by experts in numerous fields, developed the technical portion of a settlement agreement that allowed for the restoration of streamflow to satisfy both ecological demands and municipal demands. A MODFLOW ground-water model, a hydrologic model, and the classification of the riparian and biological habitat were just a few of the numerous studies that were used to establish the basis for settlement of a complex river system. The negotiated agreement acknowledges the beneficial use of water for human consumption and ecological demands.

Water Treatment
Mr. Reich was responsible for the design, construction, and operation of a 1,000 gallon per minute Liquid Granular Activated Carbon (LGAC) treatment facility to remove volatile organic carbon compounds from groundwater. The purpose of the facility was to test for the removal of VOCs in the presence of high total organic carbons that could reduce the efficacy of the treatment process. The results of the LGAC facility have been used to establish long-term management goals for the continued use of groundwater from wells in a VOC contaminated aquifer.

Groundwater Development Along Coastal Zones
Mr. Reich has led investigations regarding the development of groundwater from aquifers adjacent to the Pacific Ocean. Using numerical groundwater models and hydrogeologic principles, Mr. Reich has designed barriers to saltwater intrusion through the use of injecting reclaimed wastewater. These projects have allowed for an increase in the sustainable yield of groundwater aquifers located along coastal zones.

Reclaimed Wastewater
Mr. Reich has performed numerous investigations to develop projects that use highly treated wastewater effluent. A 36-acre constructed treatment wetland in southern California was designed to “polish” wastewater for disposal through groundwater recharge. Mr. Reich also investigated the use of existing injection wells near Las Pulgas, California and the designed new injection wells near Oceanside to dispose of reclaim ed wastewater in the transition zone that exists in aquifers between the fresh water and saltwater barrier.

Environmental and Fisheries
Mr. Reich recently completed a study in 2016 that identified minimum streamflow requirements for migration passage of southern steelhead trout in a southern California river. Working jointly with fisheries biologists, Mr.

Reich and his team conducted in-stream surveys, performed hydraulic analysis, calculated hydrologic requirements, and developed management scenarios to support fish passage. Riparian and estuarine habitat requirements that supported fish passage were also investigated as part of the study.

6.c
Packet Pg. 352
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 3 of 4
3_STEPHEN REICH CV4(2021)

RESUMES
Stephen Reich, Principal
(Continued)

Arbitrator
Currently serving as the sole arbitrator of a ground-water pumping dispute between the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Inyo County. The dispute is based on the interpretation of legal and technical agreements between the two parties regarding the amount of ground water that may be pumped from the Owens Valley, California. Review of complicated reports that discuss the impact of pumping on ground -water hydrology and ecological and biological maintenance.

Mr. Reich arbitrated a dispute between Irvine Ranch Water District and Sorrano Water District regar ding the operation of a water supply lake in southern California. Mr. Reich interpreted legal and technical agreements that allocated the division of natural and imported water supplies to each party. The result of this work led to an operations model that semi-annually records and accounts for the disposition of water from the lake.

Dam Site Investigations
As a member of the Stetson technical team consulting the Ute Indian Tribe in Utah, responsible for the gathering and interpreting geological data relevant to determining the location of a future dam site. Responsibilities included identifying and describing geologic hazards at thirteen potential dam sites both on and off the Reservation.

Water Quality Oversight
Working together with The Nature Conservancy and San Diego State University riparian ecologists, biologists, and hydrologists, led efforts in monitoring the “ecological health” of a river. The purpose of these efforts has been to monitor the health of river while at the same time meeting the municipal water demands of downstream water rights holders. Other studies involved with this task include the oversight of geomorphology and hydraulic studies associated with the characterization of a river.

Watershed Studies
• As project manager, oversee all hydrologic and hydrogeologic tasks relating to the adjudication of the Santa Margarita River Watershed. As the lead engineering firm for the U.S. Department o f Justice, work directly with the U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, various Indian Reservations, the federal Watermaster, the U.S. Geological Survey, and Rancho California Water District personnel to develop solutions relating to all water resources in the Santa Margarita River Watershed. (U.S. Department of Justice, Santa Margarita River Watershed, 1993 - ongoing). • Analyzed numerous well logs in Riverside and San Diego Counties. Analysis of these data sets was used to delineate between underflow and percolating ground water under unconfined or confined conditions as well as determining hydrogeologic characteristics of the aquifers (U.S. Department of Justice, Southern California Ground-water Studies, 1993). • Designed an integrated geophysical survey in the San Pedro River Basin in Arizona to delineate between underflow and percolating ground water. Using various DC electrical techniques as well as bore hole data, defined the lateral boundaries of the San Pedro River stream system (U.S. Department of Justice, San Pedro River Basin, 1994).

Water Rights Studies
As a member of the Stetson technical team consulting the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe, prepared documents on irrigation and land use status using aerial photographs and historic documents. Addition ally involved with a cooperative effort between the Tribe, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation in identifying the transfer of water rights. Coordinated GIS data and other databases with relevance to legal and illegal irrigated lands.
(Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe, Pyramid Lake Land Use Study, 1992 - present).

6.c
Packet Pg. 353
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 4 of 4
3_STEPHEN REICH CV4(2021)

RESUMES
Stephen Reich, Principal
(Continued)

Municipal Water Systems Analysis
Participating as a member of a Technical Committee, Mr. Reich worked directly with private deve lopers and the Contra Costa Water District in analyzing AB1600 buy-in charges for new customers. As an expert witness, Mr.

Reich has testified on the use and division of raw and treated water infrastructure by new and existing customers, including pipe network systems, reservoir, pumping plant, and canal structures. He has coordinated data acquisition of available documents and maps in order to perform hydraulic, civil, and economic analyses to support cost allocation of facilities.

Mr. Reich has authored Urban Water Management, Capital Improvement, Water Supply Plans and other supporting documents to support various water districts throughout California. Responsibilities have included supervising pipe network models, economic rate models, water rights, and water supply tasks that support the development of these plans. Additional responsibilities have included participation in presentations to water/wastewater boards and technical involvement in negotiation discussions.

Expert Witness Experience
Mr. Reich has provided expert witness testimony in numerous state and federal cases involving water rights and watershed analysis. Mr. Reich has also provided testimony in state hearings in support of water rights applications and changes. His clients have included the Unites States Department of Justice, Indian Tribes, Municipal water agencies, mutual water companies, and private developers.

Water Wells/Drilling Expertise
• Supervised mud rotary, reverse rotary, air drilling, and sonic drilling of numerous m onitoring and production wells throughout California, Utah, and Arizona. Designed and developed nested wells for monitoring vertical groundwater gradients from multiple aquifers.
• Responsible for the drilling and completion of a 1,300-foot water well on the Pechanga Indian Reservation, CA including the geological and geophysical logging of the well, determination of the screened interval, and pump testing of the well.
(U.S. Department of Justice, Pechanga Reservation Ground-water Study, 1996). • Responsible for the design, acquisition and interpretation of a seismic refraction survey to determine the suitability of a shallow ground-water supply on the Shivwitz Indian Reservation in Southwestern Utah.

Additionally, five shallow bore-holes were drilled and incorporated in the interpretation of the final results. (U.S. Department of Justice, Shivwitz Reservation Ground-water Study, 1995). • Designed and implemented both geophysical and hydrogeologic studies for the Southern California Water Company (SCWC). Working directly with their chief hydrogeologist, coordinated both field and office studies concerned with the design and location of new water wells within numerous ground-water basins throughout California. Additionally, analyzed some of SCWC’s existing water wells in Edna Valley and Barstow for the determination of surface water influences and their pertinence to drinking water standards. (SCWC Water Well Studies, 1993-94)

Prior Experience
As an independent consultant, specialized in electrical methods applied to oil fields. Responsibilities included the design, implementation, processing, interpretation and presentation of transient electromagnetic data, as well as recommendations to the personnel responsible for choosing well site locations. While with the Western Geophysical Company of Houston, Texas, supervised 120-person field crews in Turkey for the acquisition of reflection and refraction seismic data. During this time in Turkey, drilled and logged over 200 shallow exploration holes. In London, England, processed and interpreted a three-dimensional survey used for the development of an existing oil field. Applied electromagnetic techniques to define alluvial and bedrock structures outside both Ely and Carlin, Nevada. Performed studies for theoretical modeling of electromagnetic data and its applications and supervised data acquisition for deep structural gas studies. Also worked as an on-site geologist for Exlog Inc. during the exploration of a 13,000-foot well in the Bering Sea.

6.c
Packet Pg. 354
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Tainshing Ma Box20 Page 1 of 2
RESUME
Name & Title:

Tainshing Ma, Ph.D., P.E., Supervisor II
Project Assignment:

Groundwater Modeler
Years of Experience with Firm:
6 Years of Experience With Other Firms:
15 Education: Degree(s) / Year / Specialization:

Ph.D. / 1996 / Civil Engineering / University of Kansas M.S. / 1991 / Civil Engineering / University of Kansas
B.S. / 1984 / Harbor and River Engineering / National Taiwan Ocean University
Registrations / Certifications:

Washington Professional Civil Engineer No. 36220
40 Hour Hazardous Waste Operations (HAZWOPER)
Red Cross CPR Training
Select Experience
2014 – Present, Stetson Engineers, Inc.

Project Manager – San Gabriel Basin Replenishment Work, CA • Dr. Ma is responsible for conducting q uantitative and qualitative investigations on the im pacts of recycled and imported replenishment water to the Main San Gabriel Basin , providing technical supports and reviews of multiple remedial investigations at EP A superfund sites within the Main San Gabriel Basin, including the Puente Valley Operable Un it, the Baldwin Park Operable Unit, and the South El Monte Operable Unit.

Project Manager – Water Quality Protection Plan in the Montebello Forebay of the Central Basin, CA • Stetson Engineers was retained by the Pico Rivera Water Authority to prepare an en gineering report of a water quality protection plan. Dr. Ma is responsible for evaluating the performance of the upgradient EPA Whittier Narrows Operable Unit, review ing water quality data and numerical modeling investigations , performing water quality ana lysis of the Montebello Forebay region, and providing engineering recommendations for long term sustainable groundwater supply.

Technical Support – MODFLOW Simulations of the Anza -Terwilliger Basins in the central Santa Margarita River Watershed, CA
• Dr. Ma provided technical supports using MODFLOW flow model to determine groundwater supply for use by the Cahuilla Indian Reservation for irrigation. Main tasks include 1) Converting MODFLOW 96 to MODFLOW 2005, 2) Model updating, 3) Model calibration, and 4) Model future management simulations.

Other Experiences and Qualifications:

E2 Consulting Engineers, Riverside, CA, Project Hydrogeologist Multiple EPA Region 9 projects. Duties include RI/FS, subcontractor supervision, plan and coord inates, technical analysis for assigned projects and field support in sample sampling, well installation, borehole logging and site health & safety.
• Data analysis and capture zone of Muscoy-Newmark Superfund Site. • Remedial investigation of Omega Chemical Superfund Site Operable Unit. • Site inspection of Stringfellow Superfund Site.
• Remedial investigation/Feasibility Study of San Gabriel Valley Superfund Site – Puente Valley Operable. • Remedial investigation/Feasibility Study of Area 3 Superfund Site. • Montrose/Del Amo Dual-Site Groundwater Simulation for Remedial Design.

LA Department of Water and Power
• Overseeing drilling contractors to perform well installations, soil core sampling, simuprobe grounewater sampling and well development for the San Fernando Basin groundwater system improvement study. • Perform baseline groundwater sampling for the groundwater system improvement study. • Groundwater replenishment treatment pilot study.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s (PG&E’s) Groundwater Remediation of Hinkley a nd Topock Compressor Stations.
• Coordination and oversight of groundwater sampling and well installation. • Perform of deployment of transducers & data retrieval and lysimeter soil water sampling.

6.c
Packet Pg. 355
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Tainshing Ma Box20 Page 2 of 2
RESUME
Tainshing Ma, Ph.D., P.E., Sr. Engineer
Continued

Savci Environmental Technologies, L.L.C., Littleton, Colorado, Sr. Water Resources Engineer • Mining groundwater investigation, aquifer testing, data analysis, and technical reports. • Groundwater Sulfate Dilution Study – Aquifer testing, sampling data analysis and site characterization to evaluate the potential impact of groundwater quality due to installation of interception wells near Bisbee Arizona.

S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, Sr. Groundwater Hydrologist • Surface/ground water intera ction investigations, water supply study, groundwater flow and transport numerical modeling and data analysis.
• Water Supply Study in the Middle Rio Grande, New Mexico – Quantitative and probabilistic approaches to address the conjunctive-use of groundwater and surface water supply available to the Middle Rio Grande Basin under the constraints of the Rio Grande Compact. A probabilistic water budget is developed for the stream system. Groundwater conditions are linked to the stream flow system using the numer ical groundwater model. Project was conducted under U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), Albuquerque Division, and was jointly funded by the COE and the New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission (ISC). • Riparian Study of the San Joaquin River in California – To identify and prioritize information regarding surface flow needed to sustain riparian vegetation along specific reaches along a 150 -mile stretch of the San Joaquin River from Friant Dam to the Merced River. Project was conducted for the San Joaquin River Riparian habitat Restoration Program under contract with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. • Riparian Restoration in the Middle Rio Grande Basin – Shallow riparian groundwater elevations and their fluctuations in response to environmental and operational factors are being characterized along the Rio Grande in reaches. Focuses of this study are 1) quantification of water supply needs for habitat restoration projects; 2) assessments of the reliability of flows at specific locations; and 3) identification of locations for habitat restoration projects where shallow groundwater conditions are favorable for project sustainability and maintenance.

Northwest Florida Water Management District, Havana, Florida, Associate Hydrologist • Main duties include development and application of a GIS-based Ground Water Risk Analysis System for Florida northwest groundwater management, streamflow reduction investigation of the Apalachicola - Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin, aquifer testing and oversight of groundwater sampling a nd monitoring installation in the Florida Panhandle.
• Development of a GIS-based Ground Water Risk Analysis System – An ArcView extension to implement a risk analysis system was developed to evaluate the likelihood of groundwater contamination and applied to Escambia County, Florida. Project was supported by EPA and administered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

Pollution Prevention Engineering, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina, Project Engineer • Soil and groundwater environmental site assessment and storm water permitting & management.

Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kanas, Postdoctoral Researcher

6.c
Packet Pg. 356
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 1 of 2

RESUMES
Name & Title:

Jenny Savron, E.I.T., Senior II Engineer
Project Assignment:

Project Engineer
Years of Experience with Firm
18 Years of Experience with Other Firms

Education: Degree(s) / Year / Specialization:

B.S. Environmental Engineering / 2002 / University of
California, Irvine

Registrations / Certifications:

E.I.T. No. 116828, State of California, June 2003
Experience Record
Ms. Savron has experience in water resource engineering including urban water management plans, water system master plans, water supply plans, hydrologic studies, water rights and supply evaluation, and water quality studies. Ms. Savron has experience preparing Watermaster Section 28 permit applications and also preparing staff reports on behalf of Watermaster on permit application review.

Develop Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster Section 28 Permit Applications:
• City of Covina
Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster
• Participate in the development and implementation of the annual Five-Year Water Quality and Supply Plan. • Prepare the Annual Report, which reviews each year's activities, water rights history and water use. • Develop staff reports for Section 28 reviewing potential impacts on groundwater contamination as a result of drilling new wells, destroying wells and constructing new treatment facilities. • Prepare the annual Operating Safe Yield report.
• Prepare the annual Three-Year Purchased Water Plan.
• Supervise the meter testing program.

Develop Urban Water Management Plans:
• Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District
• City of Bakersfield
• City of Whittier
• City of San Jacinto
• City of South Pasadena
• City of Downey
Develop Integrated Resources Plan:
• Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District
San Gabriel River Watermaster
• Prepare an Annual Report identifying usable surface fl ow, unusable outflow and subsurface flow across Whittier Narrows
Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District
• Develop projections of future supplemental water requirements.

Develop Water System Master Plan and Sewer Master Plan
• City of San Jacinto

6.c
Packet Pg. 357
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 2 of 2

RESUMES
Develop Water Supply Assessments
• San Gabriel County Water District
• City of South Pasadena
• City of Monrovia

6.c
Packet Pg. 358
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 1 of 1
6_Heather Steele-Box21

RESUMES
Name & Title:

Heather Steele, P.E., Senior Associate
Project Assignment:

Project Engineer
Years of Experience with Firm
7 Years of Experience with Other Firms
0 Education: Degree(s) / Year / Specialization:

B.S. Civil Engineering / 2010 / California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
M.S. Water Resources Engineering / 2013 / University of Stuttgart, Germany
Registrations / Certifications:

E.I.T. No. 139551, State of California, July 16, 2010
P.E. No. 87237, State of California, June 1, 2017
Experience Record
Ms. Steele has experience in water resource engineering including water supply plans, groundwater basin management, environmental compliance, water rights evaluations, water system master plans, hydrologic studies, water quality studies, and grant writing.

Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Authority
• Prepared grant funding applications under Proposition 1 • Developed a comprehensive Groundwater Sustainability Plan for Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Basin in compliance with the requirements of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. • Prepared Annual Reports.

City of La Habra
• Prepared alternative Groundwater Sustainability Plan for Sustainable Groundwater Ma nagement Act compliance.
• Prepared Annual Reports.

Morongo Band of Mission Indians
• Evaluated water rights under the Practicably Irrigable Acreage standard.

Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District
• Prepared Feasibility Study to evaluate recycled water treatment alternatives. • Developed Title 22 Engineering Report for an indirect potable reuse recycled water project. • Developed CEQA Initi al Study and NEPA Environmental Assessment for an indirect potable reuse recycled water project.
• Prepared Urban Water Management Plans.

Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster
• Developed Salt and Nutrient Management Plan including determining basin assimilative capacity and conducting antidegradation analyses.
• Developed program-level CEQA environmental compliance document.

Raymond Basin Watermaster
• Developed Salt and Nutrient Management Plan including determining ba sin assimilative capacity and conducting antidegradation analyses.
• Developed program-level CEQA environmental compliance document.

City of Glendora
• Prepared comprehensive water system Master Plan.

Three Valleys Municipal Water District
• Analyzed opportunities and constraints for the use of treated groundwater to reduce imported water demands.

6.c
Packet Pg. 359
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 1 of 1

RESUMES
Name & Title:

Noah Wasserman, GISP, GIS Manager
Project Assignment:

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Manager
Years of Experience with Firm:
14 Years of Experience With Other Firms:
3 Education: Degree(s) / Year / Specialization:

M.A./ 2009 / Geography / San Francisco State University B.A. / 2001 / Urban Studies and Planning / University of California, San Diego
Registrations / Certifications:

Geographic Information Systems Professional
(GISP) / May 2015
Experience Record

Mr. Wasserman has been working with GIS since 2000. At Stetson Engineers, Mr. Wasserman has focused on GIS mapping and spatial analysis. Typical tasks include (but are not limited to) map/figure production and layout, analysis of vector and raster data (including aerial images), data management, online mapping and data applications, field data collection, etc. He has worked extensively on present/historic irrigation aerial photography interpretation and image georeferencing as they relate to Stetson projects.

2007 – Present, Stetson Engineers, Inc.

GIS and spatial analyst technician and manager, support water resources management projects across the American West.

Provide technical support and project design to project engineers on irrigation, water rights and resource management projects in addition to map/figure layout production, and online mapping and data applications.

Previous Experience
GIS Consultant for Intersect, LLC, San Jose, CA
Mr. Wasserman provided GIS and cartographic support for international materials sampling project. Typical tasks included preparation and analysis of country scale spatial data as well as map/figure production. Created and edited map layouts from collected data for project reporting and planning purposes.

Master’s Degree Program, Environmental Resource Management, at San Francisco State University, CA Mr. Wasserman’s course work included several GIS classes specific to resource management as well as instruction in remote sensing and analysis techniques. GIS projects included (but were not limited to) analysis of historic serpentine grasslands within San Francisco’s Presidio, a report and examples on how GIS tools could be utilized to help assess and guide rebuild/redesign efforts in post-hurricane-Katrina New Orleans, and analysis of vegetation changes in alpine and subalpine communities of the Sierra Nevada Mountains, which was completed as a Master’s Thesis titled Vegetation Change Trends in Yosemite National Park Over the Last Century (1890-2008).

GIS Intern for Telesis Corporation, San Diego, CA
Worked with ArcView software to organize source data and conducted test mapping for various community projects including San Diego crime mapping and PG&E streetlight maintenance projects.

Bachelor’s Degree Program at University of California, San Diego, CA As part of the UCSD’s Urban Studies and Planning department core curriculum, Mr. Wasserman’s first exposure to GIS was on the ESRI ArcView 3.x suite. Since then, he has had experience working with a number of spatial analysis software packages including ArcGIS (ArcMap 10.x), QGIS, and Erdas Imagine 9.x. As an undergraduate, he interned for the Telesis Corporation and completed a senior research project which utilized GIS tools to analyze regional socio-economics and various educational indicators of local San Diego high schools as they related to achievement gaps and access to higher education.

In 2003, Mr. Wasserman helped research, manage data, and produce the joint Conservation International and United Nations Environment Programme publication Tourism and Biodiversity: Mapping Tourism’s Global Footprint. The accompanying ArcExplorer and data CD was designed and developed by Mr. Wasserman.

6.c
Packet Pg. 360
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Stetson Engineers Inc. Page 1 of 1
8_Karen Brunelle-Box21

RESUMES
Name & Title:

Karen Brunelle, Associate III
Project Assignment:

Office Manager – Covina, CA
Years of Experience with Firm
13 Years of Experience with Other Firms
1 Education: Degree(s) / Year / Specialization:

B.A. Behavioral Sciences / 2006 / California State
Polytechnic University, Pomona
Registrations / Certifications:

Experience Record
Mrs. Brunelle has been employed by Stetson Engineers Inc. since 2008. As Covina’s Office Manager, her responsibilities include the coordination and oversight of all administrative duties i n Stetson’s Covina office, including but not limited to:
• Covina office payroll and timesheets.
• Reconciliation of Covina office monthly accounting reports (reproduction, postage, petty cash, etc.) • Processing and coordination of Covina office client invoicing, and accounts payable. • Managing and ordering Covina office supplies.
• Logging and distribution of daily mail.
• Support staff to project engineers /project managers on administrative aspects of technical reports, requests for proposals, meeting scheduling/coordination, data entry, preparation and maintenance of project budgets, annual reports, client follow up, etc. • Oversight of general Covina day to day operations.

6.c
Packet Pg. 361
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan

Submitted: September 29, 2021

ATTACHMENT B

FEE SCHEDULE

6.c
Packet Pg. 362
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Standard Billing Rate Schedule
Professional Fees

Principal $237.00 Per Hour
Special Project Director $237.00 Per Hour
Project Manager, Senior $206.00 Per Hour
Supervisor I $206.00 Per Hour
Supervising Soil Scientist $191.00 Per Hour
Supervisor II $191.00 Per Hour
Supervisor III $185.00 Per Hour
Senior I $165.00 Per Hour
Senior II $149.00 Per Hour
Senior III $134.00 Per Hour
Construction Manager $134.00 Per Hour
Construction Manager / Oversight $118.00 Per Hour
Senior Construction Inspector $118.00 Per Hour
Senior Field Geologist $134.00 Per Hour
Senior Associate $128.00 Per Hour
Associate I $122.00 Per Hour
Associate II $116.00 Per Hour
Associate III $111.00 Per Hour
Associate Soil Scientist $111.00 Per Hour
Senior Assistant $103.00 Per Hour
Assistant I $98.00 Per Hour
Assistant II $93.00 Per Hour
Assistant Soil Scientist $93.00 Per Hour
Assistant III $88.00 Per Hour
GIS Manager $122.00 Per Hour
GIS Specialist I $101.00 Per Hour
GIS Specialist II $91.00 Per Hour
Technical Illustrator $88.00 Per Hour
AutoCAD Technician $88.00 Per Hour
Soil Technician $77.00 Per Hour
Aide I $72.00 Per Hour
Aide II $62.00 Per Hour
Aide III $57.00 Per Hour
Project Coordinator I $134.00 Per Hour
Project Coordinator II $98.00 Per Hour
Project Coordinator III $88.00 Per Hour
Contract Management $103.00 Per Hour
Administrative I $72.00 Per Hour
Administrative II $67.00 Per Hour
Administrative III $62.00 Per Hour

Effective January 1, 2019

6.c
Packet Pg. 363
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

Direct Expense Rates

Expense Description Billing Rate
Fax $0.30 / Page
Mileage $* / Mile
Reproduction: Black & White (In-House) $0.15 / Page
Reproduction: Color - 8.5" x 11" (In-House) $0.89 / Page Reproduction: Color - 11" x 17" (In-House) $1.89 / Page Plotter Reproduction (In-House) $1.50 / Sq. Ft.

Specialty Computer Expense (In-House) $15.00 / Hour 4x4 Truck with Drill Rig $150.00 / Day
Survey Equipment $120.00 / Day

Notes:
1) * Mileage is billed at the current IRS approved mileage rate and may be subject to change . 2) Subcontractor services will be charged at cost plus 10% administration fee. 3) All other project reimbursable expenses (i.e., telephone, commercial transportation, meals, lodging, postage, outside reproduction, etc.) will be billed at cost. 4) Testimony fees are 150% of standard rates and apply to depositions, court time and time spent on stand -by at attorney's request. Travel time and preparation time is charged at standard rates. Stetson Engineers Inc. authorizes only staff at associate classification or higher to testify as expert witnesses.

6.c
Packet Pg. 364
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) RIALTO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL STETSON ENGINEERS INC.

Proposal for Development of the Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Plan

Submitted: September 29, 2021

ATTACHMENT C

PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT

6.c
Packet Pg. 365
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

West Valley Water District

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
With
___ _____________________

6.c
Packet Pg. 366
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Section 1. Term of Agreement ..........................................................................1

Section 2. Scope and Performance of Services ................................................1

Section 3. Additional Services and Changes in Services ..................................3

Section 4. Familiarity with Services and Site .....................................................3

Section 5. Compensation and Payment ............................................................4

Section 6. Required Documentation prior to Performance ................................4

Section 7. Project Documents ...........................................................................5

Section 8. Consultant’s Books and Records .....................................................5

Section 9. Status of Consultant .........................................................................6

Section 10. Compliance with Applicable Laws ....................................................7

Section 11. Conflicts of Interest ...........................................................................7

Section 12. Confidential Information; Release of Information ..............................7

Section 13. Indemnification .................................................................................8

Section 14. Insurance ..........................................................................................9

Section 15. Assignment .......................................................................................9

Section 16. Termination of Agreement ................................................................9

Section 17. Notices ........................................................................................... 10

Section 18. General Provisions ......................................................................... 11

Exhibit “A” Task Order

Exhibit “B” Key Personnel

Exhibit “C” Insurance

6.c
Packet Pg. 367
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 1 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (“Agreement”) effective as of this _____ day of ________, 2021 (“Effective Date”) is by and between West Valley Water District (“District”) and _ __________________(“Consultant”). The District and Consultant may be collectively referred to as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party.”

RECITALS
A. The Parties desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of setting forth the terms and conditions upon which Consultant shall provide certain services to District.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Term of Agreement.
(a) Subject to subsection ( b) below, the term of this Agreement will be for a period of one (1) year commencing on the Effective Date and terminating one (1) year after the Effective Date.
(b) This Agreement shall renew automatically for continuous one (1) year periods for no more than two (2) additional years, unless either Party, prior to the end of the existing one (1) year period, delivers written notice to the other Party, that the Agreement shall not be extended.

Section 2. Scope and Performance of Services.

2.1 (a) District may, from time to time, by written instructions from the general manager or assistant general manager of the District (“Authorized Representative”) issue task orders (“Task Orders”) to the Consultant. The Task Order shall be in such form and content as shall be set forth on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. The Task Order shall set forth: (i) the scope of services to be performed by Consultant; (ii) the compensation to be paid to Consultant; and (iii) the time to complete the Task Order. The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to all such Task Orders.
(b) For each Task Order, Consultant shall confer, as requested, with District representatives to review progress of work elements, adherence to work schedule, coordination of work, scheduling of review and resolution of problems which may develop.

2.2 Consultant will furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing,

6.c
Packet Pg. 368
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 2 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities, and all tests, testing and analyses, calculation, and all other means whatsoever, except as otherwise expressly specified in this Agreement, necessary or proper to perform and complete the services required of Consultant under this Agreement.

2.3 Consultant’s designated representative(s) who are authorized to act on its behalf and to make all decisions in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement are listed in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (“Key Personnel”).

2.4 Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Notwithstanding Section 3 below, in the event Consultant utilizes the services of subcontractors or sub-consultants, Consultant assumes sole and complete responsibility for the performance of the subcontractor or sub-consultant to t he specifications provided hereunder for Consultant’s work, and no adjustment will be made to Consultant’s requirements under this Agreement for timely completion of services, complete performance of services, or delivery of products or deliverables in a t imely fashion, and no adjustment will be made to performance deadlines, or compensation due to Consultant, due to or arising from issues Consultant may have with any subcontractor or sub- consultant. Consultant will at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described in this Agreement. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to those required of Consultant under this Agreement.

Consultant warrants it will perform its engineering and design under the Task Order, as more particularly described in Exhibit A ("Task Order") in accordance with th e current standards of care and diligence normally practiced by recognized engineering and design firms in performing services of a similar nature. Further, Consultant warrants that the engineering and design performed has been performed in accordance with the then current standards of care and diligence normally practiced by recognized engineering and design firms in performing services of a similar nature. If within one (1) year after substantial completion of the engineering and design work it is shown that there is an error in that work as a result of the Consultant’s failure to meet those standards and the District has notified the Consultant in writing of any such error within that period, Consultant shall re-perform such engineering and design work within the original scope of such services, as may be necessary to remedy such error. All costs incurred by Consultant in performing such corrective services shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant and such costs shall not be reimbursable in any way.

6.c
Packet Pg. 369
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 3 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
Section 3. Additional Services and Changes in Services

3.1 Consultant will not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to or outside of those set forth in the Task Orders, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by District.

3.2 If Consultant believes that additional services are needed to complete a Task Order, Consultant will provide the Authorized Representative with written notification describing the proposed additional services, the reasons for such services, and a detailed proposal regarding cost.

3.3 District may order changes to a Task Order, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the compensation to be paid Consultant will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, and executed by Consultant and District. The cost or credit to District resulting from changes in a Task Order will be determined by the written agreement between the Parties.

Section 4. Familiarity with Services and Site.

4.1 By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant shall, prior to undertaking a Task Order:
(a) investigate and consider the services to be performed; (b) carefully consider how and within what time frame the services should be performed;
(c) understand the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under a Task Order; and
(d) possesses all licenses required under local, state or federal law to perform the services contemplated by a Task Order, and maintain all required licenses during the performance of such Task Order.

4.2 If services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, before commencing its services under a Task Order. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions that may materially affect the performance of services, Consultant will imm ediately inform District of such fact and will not proceed except at Consultant’s own risk until written instructions are received from the District.

6.c
Packet Pg. 370
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 4 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
Section 5. Compensation and Payment.

5.1 Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, District agrees to pay Consultant the amounts shown in a Task Order.

5.2 Each month during the existence of a Task Order, Consultant shall furnish District with an original invoice for all services performed and expenses incurred during the prec eding month in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in the Task Order. The invoice must detail charges by the following categories: labor (by subcategory), reimbursable costs, subcontractor contracts and miscellaneous expenses. The invoice must lis t, as applicable, the hours worked and hourly rates for each personnel category, the tasks performed, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period, the cumulative percentage completed for each task, and the total cost of the services.

5.3 District will independently review each invoice submitted by Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice will be approv ed and paid. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by District, the original invoice will be returned by District to Consultant for correction and resubmission.

5.4 Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant that are disputed by District, District will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Consultant’s invoice.

5.5 No payment or partial payment to Consultant shall constitute acceptance of any work completed by Consultant or waive any claims by the District for any reason whatsoever.

Section 6. Required Documentation Prior to Performance.

6.1 Consultant will not perform any services under this Agreement until:
(a) Consultant furnishes proof of insurance (“Insurance”) as required under Exhibit “C” attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and
(b) Consultant provides District with a Taxpayer Identification Number.

6.2 The District will have no obligation to pay for any services rendered by Consultant in advance of receiving written authorization to proceed for each Task Order, and Consultant acknowledges that any such services are at Consultant’s own risk.

6.c
Packet Pg. 371
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 5 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
Section 7. Project Documents.

7.1 All original m aps, m odels, designs, dr awings, pho tographs, studies, surveys, r eports, d ata, n otes, c omputer programs, f iles and ot her documents ( collectively, “ Project D ocuments”) pr epared, dev eloped o r discovered by C onsultant i n the c ourse of providing s ervices under t his Agreement w ill bec ome t he s ole pr operty of D istrict and m ay b e us ed, reused or ot herwise di sposed of by D istrict w ithout the permission o f Consultant. Consultant will take such steps as are necessary to perfect or protect the ownership interest of District in such Project Documents. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this A greement, C onsultant shall turn over to District all such original Project Documents in its possession; provided, how ever, t hat Consultant m ay retain copies of P roject Documents.

7.2 Except as necessary for the performance of services under this Agreement, no Project Documents prepared under this Agreement, will be released by Consultant t o any other per son or entity w ithout D istrict’s pr ior written approval. All press releases, including graphic display information to be published, must b e a pproved an d di stributed s olely by D istrict, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by District.

Section 8. Consultant’s Books and Records.

8.1 Consultant s hall maintain any a nd all doc uments and r ecords demonstrating or relating to Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. C onsultant s hall maintain a ny and al l l edgers, books o f account, i nvoices, v ouchers, c anceled c hecks, or ot her d ocuments or records ev idencing o r r elating t o w ork, services, ex penditures and disbursements charged to District under this Agreement. Any and all such documents or r ecords m ust b e maintained i n ac cordance w ith ge nerally accepted ac counting pr inciples and m ust be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Consultant under this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records must be maintained for three (3) years following the final payment for each Task Order.

8.2 Any and all records or documents required to be maintained by this section must be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by District or its designated representatives. C opies of such documents or records must be provided directly to District for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; ot herwise, unl ess an al ternative i s m utually agr eed u pon, s uch documents and records must be made available at Consultant’s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.

Suggested
Consultant. the
to exposrue legal or liability without and risk sole District's the at be shall Agreement this by intended purposes the within not Documents Project the of use such Any Addition: 6.c Packet Pg. 372
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 6 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy

8.3 Where District has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained by this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Consultant’s business, District may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to a person or entity mutually agreed upon and that such documents and records thereafter be maintained by such person or entity at Consultant’s expense. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to District, as well as to its successors- in-interest and authorized representatives.

Section 9. Status of Consultant.

9.1 Consultant is and will at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer or employ ee of District. Consultant has no authority to bind District in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against District, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by District.

9.2 The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant will at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither District, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of District, will have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, subcontractors or sub- consultants, employees or agents, except as provided in this Agre ement.

Consultant warrants that it will not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of District.

9.3 Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, will obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to District’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim to any such rights or benefits.

Section 10. Compliance with Applicable Laws.

Consultant shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement.

6.c
Packet Pg. 373
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 7 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
Section 11. Conflicts of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither Consultant, nor any officer, principal nor employee of its firm, has or will acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, that would conflict in any manner with the interests of District or that would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that neither Consultant, nor any officer, principal or employee of its firm will make, participate in the making, or in any way attempt to use the position of Consultant to influence any decision of the District in which Consultant knows or has reason to know that Consultant, or any officer, principal or employee of Consultant has a financial interest as defined in Government Code section 87103.

Section 12. Confidential Information; Release of Information.

12.1 All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement will be considered confidential to the full extent permitted by law, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than District without prior written authorization from an Authorized Representative, except as may be required by law.

12.2 Consultant, its officers, employees, or agents, shall not, without prior written authorization from an Authorized Representative or unless requested by the District counsel, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order will not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives District notice of such court order or subpoena.

12.3 If Consultant, or any officer, employee, or agent of Consultant, provides any information or work product (including Project Documents) in violation of this Agreement, then District shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys’ fees related to any unauthorized disclosure by consultant or, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.

12.4 Consultant shall promptly notify District should, Consultant, its officers, employees, or agents be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the services performed under this Agreement. District retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding.

Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with District and to provide District with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by

6.c
Packet Pg. 374
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 8 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by District to control, direct, or rewrite such response.

Section 13. Indemnification.

Consultant covenants and agrees that, during the term of this Agreement, any injury suffered as a result of Consultant’s services shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant and its successors and assigns and District shall not be liable to Consultant, or any other person or persons whatsoever for any such injury, loss or damage to persons or property unless caused by the negligence or intentional acts of District or its Representatives (as solely defined below ). Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold District, its officers, directors and Representatives (“District Indemnitees”) harmless from and against any and all claims, costs, liabilities, debts, demands, suits, actions, causes of action, obligations, proceedings, damages, judgments, liens and expenses of whatever nature, including attorneys’ fees and disbursements (collectively, “Claims”) which may be made against the District Indemnitees arising out of or in connection with (a) the retention by Distri ct of Consultant’s services; (b) the performance of or failure to perform, the work covered by this Agreement which is caused or occasioned by any act, action, neglect on the part of Consultant, or its Representatives, in the performance of this Agreement and the work to be done under this Agreement; (c) the death and/or injury to any person or damage to any property (real or personal) and/or economic loss which may be caused or is claimed to have been caused, by the negligence, act or omission of Consultant or its Representatives or its or their property; (d) any violation or alleged violation by Consultant of any law or regulation now or hereafter enacted; and (e) any breach by Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement. The foregoing indemnity shall not apply to the extent any such Claims are ultimately established by a court of competent jurisdiction to have been caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the District Indemnitees or any of them. District shall make all decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding concerning this section. If Consultant fails to do so, District shall have the right, but not the obligation, to defend the same and charge all of the direct or incidental Claims of such defense, including attorneys’ fees and costs, to Consultant and to recover the same from Consultant.

The term “Representatives” shall mean employees, representatives, agents, contractors, subcontractors or any other persons directly or indirectly employed by any one of the foregoing or reasonably under the control of any of the foregoing or for whose acts any of the foregoing may be liable.

Section 14. Insurance.

Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the Insurance coverages listed in Exhibit “C.” All Insurance policies

6.c
Packet Pg. 375
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 9 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
shall be subject to approval by District as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by an Authorized Representative.

Section 15. Assignment.

15.1 The expertise and experience of Consultant are material considerations for this Agreement. District has an interest in the qualifications of and capability of the persons and entities that will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant may not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Consultant’s duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of District. The District can withhold its approval/consent in its sole and absolute discretion. Any attempted assignment will be null and void, and will constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling District to any and all remedies at law or i n equity, including summary termination of this Agreement.

15.2 Consultant must obtain District’s prior written approval before utilizing any subcontractors to perform any services under this Agreement, which approval may be withheld in District’s sole and absolute discretion. This written approval must include the identity of the subcontractor and the terms of compensation. Approval by District does not imply any agreement to or endorsement by the District as to the competency or capability of any proposed subcontractor or sub-consultant, and District reserves any and all rights against both Consultant and such subcontractor or sub- consultant , for any failure to perform or other breach of any of the provisions of this Agreement, or the standards of performance defined herein, and no waiver is intended or to be implied by District’s approval of any subcontractor or sub-consultant.

Section 16. Termination of Agreement.

16.1 District may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by written notice of termination to Consultant. In the event such notice is given, Consultant shall cease immediately all work in progress.

16.2 Upon termination of this Agreement, all property belonging exclusively to District which is in Consultant’s possession must be returned to District.

Consultant shall promptly deliver to District a final invoice for all outstanding services performed and expenses incurred by Consultant as of the date of termination. Compensation for work in progres s not based on an hourly rate will be prorated based on the percentage of work completed as of the date of termination.

6.c
Packet Pg. 376
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 10 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy

16.3 Consultant ac knowledges District’s right t o t erminate t his Agreement as provided in this section, and hereby waives any and all claims for damages that might otherwise arise from District’s termination of this Agreement.

Section 17. Notices.

17.1 All written notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement will be de emed made when received by the other Party at its respective address as follows:

To District: West Valley Water District
855 West Base Line Road
P. O. Box 920
Rialto, CA 92377
Attention: Shamindra Manbahal
Interim General Manager

(Tel.) 909-875-1804
(Fax) 909-875-1849

To Consultant: Vendor Name________
Address
Phone Number
Email

** Please send all invoices by:

Email: [email protected]

Mail: West Valley Water District
Accounts Payable
P.O. Box 920
Rialto, CA 92377

17.2 Notice w ill be deemed e ffective o n t he date per sonally d elivered o r transmitted by facsimile. If the notice is mailed, notice will be deemed given three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, for first class delivery, or upon delivery if using a major courier service with tracking capabilities.

Suggested Deletion.

6.c
Packet Pg. 377
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 11 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy

17.3 Any Party may change its notice information by giving notice to the other Party in compliance with this section.

Section 18. General Provisions.

18.1 Authority to Execute. Each Party represents and warrants that all necessary action has been taken by such Party to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to bind it to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

18.2 Binding Effect. Subject to Section 15, this Agreement is binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties, including any subcontractors or sub-consultants of Consultant.

18.3 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including th e attached Exhibits “A” through “C,” is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the matters addressed in this Agreement and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, between Consultant and District prior to the execution of this Agreement.

18.4 Modification of Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement will be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and approved in writing by the Board of Directors of the District, or in writing by the General Manager, if such power has been delegated to General Manager. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver will be void.

18.5 Facsimile Signatures. Amendments to this Agreement will be considered executed when the signature of a Party is delivered by facsimile transmission. Such facsimile signature will have the same effect as an original signature.

18.6 Waiver. Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of any other provision, or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by District of any services by Consultant will not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

18.7 Interpretation. This Agr eement will be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. Each Party has had the opportunity to review this Agreement with legal counsel. The Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning, and without resort to rules regarding draftsmanship. It will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party.

6.c
Packet Pg. 378
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 12 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy

18.8 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be ruled invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the Parties s hall: (a) promptly negotiate a substitute for the provisions which shall to the greatest extent legally permissible, effect the intent of the Parties in the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision, and (b) negotiate such changes in, substitutions for or additions to the remaining provisions of this Agreement as may be necessary in addition to and in conjunction with subsection (a) above to give effect to the intent of the Parties without the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision. To the extent the Parties are unable to negotiate such changes, substitutions or additions as set forth in the preceding sentence, and the intent of the Parties with respect to the essential terms of the Agreement may be carried out without the invalid, illegal or unenfor ceable provisions, the balance of this Agreement shall not be affected, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provisions did not exist.

18.9 Venue. The Parties agree any action or proceeding to enf orce or relating to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in the federal court located in Riverside County, California or state court located in San Bernardino County, California and the Parties hereto consent to the exercise of personal jurisdiction over them by such courts for purposes of any such action or proceeding.

18.10 Disputes. If any disputes should arise between the Parties concerning the work to be done under this Agreement, the payments to be made, or the manner of accomplishment of the work, Consultant shall nevertheless proceed to perform the work as directed by District pending settlement of the dispute.

18.11 Cooperation. Consultant shall cooperate in the performance of work with District and all other agents.

18.12 Time of Essence. Time shall be of the essence as to all dates and times of performance contained in this Agreement.

18.13 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed and delivered in any number of counter parts, each of which, when signed and delivered, shall be an original, but all of which shall together constitute one and the same Agreement.

6.c
Packet Pg. 379
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 13 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed effective as of the day and year first above written.

DISTRICT:

WEST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT,
a public agency of the State of California

By ______________________________________
Channing Hawkins, President

By ______________________________________
Shamindra, Manbahal, Interim General Manager

By_______________________________________
Peggy Asche, Board Secretary

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

TAFOYA LAW GROUP, APC

By ______________________________________
Robert Tafoya

CONSULTANT:

________________________________

Name

Its

6.c
Packet Pg. 380
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 14 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy

EXHIBIT A

TASK ORDER

6.c
Packet Pg. 381
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 15 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy

TASK ORDER NO. __1___
This Task Order (“Task Order”) is executed this ____ day of __________ , 2021 by and between West Valley Water District, a public agency of the State of California (“District”) and _____________________ (“Consultant”).

RECITALS

A. On or about _________________, 2021 District and Consultant executed that certain Agreement for Professional Services (“Agreement”).

B. The Agreement provides that the District will issue Task Orders from time to time, for the provision of certain services by Consultant.

C. Pursuant to the Agreement, District and Consultant desire to enter into this Task Order for the purpose of setting forth the terms and conditions upon which Consultant shall render certain services to the District.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Consultant agrees to perform the services set forth on Exhibit “1” attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

2. Subject to any limitations in the Agreement, District shall pay to Consultant the amounts specified in Exhibit “2” attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, may not exceed the amount set forth in Exhibit “2,” unless additional compensation is approved in writing by the District.

3. Consultant shall perform the services described in Exhibit “1” in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit “3” attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Consultant shall commence work immediately upon receipt of a notice to proceed from the District. District will have no obligation to pay for any services rendered by Consultant in advance of receipt of the notice to proceed, and Consultant acknowledges that any such services are at Consultant’s own risk.

4. The provisions of the Agreement shall apply to this Task Order. As such, the terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

6.c
Packet Pg. 382
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 16 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Task Order to be executed effective as of the day and year first above written.

DISTRICT:

WEST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT,
a public agency of the State of California

_____________________________________
Channing Hawkins, President

_____________________________________
Shamindra Manbahal, Interim General
Manager

Peggy Asche, Board Secretary

CONSULTANT:

Vendor Name Here ____________________

Name

Its

Name

Its

6.c
Packet Pg. 383
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 17 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
EXHIBIT “1”

TASK ORDER NO. __1__

SCOPE OF SERVICES

6.c
Packet Pg. 384
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 18 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
EXHIBIT “2”

TASK ORDER NO. __1__

COMPENSATION

6.c
Packet Pg. 385
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 19 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
EXHIBIT “3”

TASK ORDER NO. __1__

SCHEDULE

6.c
Packet Pg. 386
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 20 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy

EXHIBIT B

KEY PERSONNEL
Consultant’s designated representative(s) who are authorized to act on its behalf and to make all decisions in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement are:

_______________________

6.c
Packet Pg. 387
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 21 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE

6.c
Packet Pg. 388
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 22 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy

INSURANCE

A. General Requirements. Before commencing the performance of services under this Agreement, and at all other times this Agreement is effective, Consultant must procure and maintain the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits set forth below:

Type of Insurance Limits (combined single)

Commercial General Liability: $1,000,000
Business Automobile Liability $1,000,000
Professional Liability $1,000,000
Workers Compensation Statutory Requirement

B. Commercial General Liability Insurance. The amount of insurance set forth above must be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. The insurance must be on an “occurrence” not a “claims made” basis.

C. Business Automobile Insurance. Automobile coverage must be written on forms subject to the written approval of District.

D. Professional Liability Insurance . This coverage must be on an “occurrence” basis, including coverage for contractual liability. The Professional Liability Insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to services performed under this Agreement.

E. Workers Compensation. Consultant must have a State of California approved policy form providing the statutory benefits required by law with employer’s liability limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for all covered losses, or Consultant must provide evidence of an approved self-insurance program.

F. Additional Insureds. Each Commercial General Liability Insurance policy and Business Auto Insurance policy must provide that the District, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers are “additional insureds” under the terms of the policy, and must provide that an act or omission of one the insureds will not reduce or avoid coverage to the other insureds.

G. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retention. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions applicable to the insurance policies required under this Agreement must be declared to and approved by District. In no event may any requi red insurance policy have a deductible, self -insured retention or other similar policy provision in excess of $50,000 without prior written approval by District in its sole discretion.

At the option of District, either the insurer will reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions with respect to the District’s additional insureds or Consultant will procure a bond guaranteeing payment of any losses, damages, expenses, costs or settlements up to the amount of such deductibles or self - insured retentions.

6.c
Packet Pg. 389
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 23 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
H. Primary Insurance . Each of the insurance policies maintained by Consultant under this Agreement must state that such insurance will be deemed “primary” so that any insurance that may be carried by District will be deemed excess to that of Consultant. This endorsement must be reflected on forms as determined by District.

I. Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements. Prior to commencing any services under this Agreement, Consultant must file with the District certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing the existence of all insurance required by this Agreement, along with such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as may reasonably be required by District. These certificates of insurance and endorsements must be in a form approved by the Legal Counsel. Consultant must maintain current certificates and endorsements on file with District during the term of this Agreement reflecting the existence of all required insurance. Each of the certificates must expressly provide that no material change in the policy, or termination thereof, will be effective except upon 30 days ’ prior written notice to District by certified mail, return receipt requested. The delivery to District of any certificates of insurance or endorsements that do not comply with the requirements of this Agreement will not waive the District’s right to require compliance.

J. Insurance Rating. All insurance required to be maintained by Consultant under this Agreement must be issued by companies licensed by or admi tted to conduct insurance business in the State of California by the California Department of Insurance and must have a rating of A or better and Class VII or better by the latest edition of A.M. Best’s Key Rating Guide.

K. Aggregate Limits. The aggregate limits for each insurance policy required under this Agreement must apply separately and solely to the services performed under this Agreement. If the required policies do not have an endorsement providing that the aggregate limit applies separately to the services being performed, or if defense costs are included in the aggregate limit, then the required aggregate limits must be increased to an amount satisfactory to District.

L. Waiver of Subrogation Rights. Consultant and each insurer providing any insurance required by this Agreement must waive all rights of subrogation against District, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, and each insurer must issue a certificate to the District evidencing this waiver of subrogation rights.

M. Failure to Maintain Required Insurance . If Consultant, for any reason, fails to obtain and maintain the insurance required by this Agreement, District may obtain such coverage at Consultant’s expense and deduct the cost of such insurance from payments due to Consultant under this Agreement or may terminate the Agreement.

N. Effect of Coverage. The existence of the required insurance coverage under this Agreement shall not be deemed to satisfy or limit Consultant’s indemnity obligations under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this Agreement constitute the minimum coverage and policy limits required. Any insurance proceeds available to District

6.c
Packet Pg. 390
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council) 24 Rev. 12/17/19 Master Copy
in excess of the limits and coverage required by this Agreement, and which is applicable to a given loss, must be made available to District to compensate it for such losses.

6.c
Packet Pg. 391
Attachment: Stetson_Final_Proposal_09292021 (3453 : Resolution - Rialto Basin Groundwater Council)

ITEM NO. 7

STAFF REPORT

DATE: JANUARY 4, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: BRIAN DICKINSON, PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITY SERVICES

DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: WAIVE FULL READING, READ BY TITLE ONLY AND PASS

SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER

6.16 OF THE COLTON MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SOLID
WASTE. ORDINANCE NO. O-12-21

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

Waive full reading, and Approve Second Reading of an Ordinance No. O-12-21, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Colton for Collection and Disposal of Residential Organic Waste for Compliance with SB 1383.

BACKGROUND

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

FISCAL IMPACTS

ALTERNATIVES

ATTACHMENT

1. Colton_ SB 1383 Ordinance O-12-21 12.21.2021

2. Draft Colton_ SB 1383 Ordinance Exhibit A-c1
7 Packet Pg. 392
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

ORDINANCE NO. O-12-21

AN ORDINANCE OF THE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 6.16 OF THE COLTON MUNICIPAL CODE

RELATING TO SOLID WASTE
WHEREAS, SB 1383 (Chapter 395, Statutes of 2016) directed the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (“CalRecycle”) to adopt regulations to reduce organic waste by 50 percent from its 2014 baseline level by 2020 and 75 percent by 2025; and

WHEREAS, SB 1383 also requires the regulations to recover, for human consumptio n, at least 20 percent of edible food that is currently thrown away; and

WHEREAS, CalRecycle promulgated regulations as directed in SB 1383 in Chapter 12 (Short-Lived Climate Pollutants) of Division 7 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (“SB 1383 Regulations”); and

WHEREAS, the SB 1383 Regulations require the City to provide organic waste collection and processing services to all residential , commercial and business customers, and require those customers to subscribe to organic waste collection service; and

WHEREAS, the City must establish an edible food recovery program to require commercial edible food generators to donate edible food that would otherwise be thrown away to food recovery organizations; and

WHEREAS, the SB 1383 Regulations take effect January 1, 2022, and require the City of Colton to adopt an ordinance to enforce the SB 1383 Regulations by said date, and;

WHEREAS, t he City Council desires to amend its Garbage and Refuse Ordinance to comply with the SB 1383 Regulations.

7.a
Packet Pg. 393
Attachment: Colton_ SB 1383 Ordinance O-12-21 12.21.2021 (3457 : Second Reading - O-12-21) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

NOW, THEREFORE , THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 6.16 is hereby amended in its entirety as set forth in Exhibit A, incorporated by this reference.

SECTION 2. Environmental review is not required because adoption of the Ordinance is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15378(b)(5) (organization or administrative activities of governments not a project).

SECTION 3. If any section, subsecti on, clause or phrase in this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is for any reason held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this Ordinance or the application of such provisions to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phr ases or the application thereof to any person or circumstance be held invalid.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall publish this Ordinance in accordance with Government Code section 36933.

SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force 30 da ys after its adoption.

7.a
Packet Pg. 394
Attachment: Colton_ SB 1383 Ordinance O-12-21 12.21.2021 (3457 : Second Reading - O-12-21) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ___________, 2022.

_____
______________________________
Frank J. Navarro
Mayor

ATTEST:

__
_____________________________
Carolina R. Padilla
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Carlos Campos
City Attorney

7.a
Packet Pg. 395
Attachment: Colton_ SB 1383 Ordinance O-12-21 12.21.2021 (3457 : Second Reading - O-12-21) Ordinance No. O-12-21
Exhibit A
Title 6 - HEALTH AND SAFETY
Chapter 6.16 SOLID WASTE

Page 1 of 21 ends

Colton City CouncilJanuary 4, 2022

Colton City Council
January 4, 2022