Colton City Council
February 7, 2023

1 CITY OF COLTON
City Hall, Council Chambers
650 N. La Cadena Drive
Colton, CA 92324
Website: www.coltonca.gov

Mayor Frank J. Navarro
Council Members:

David J. Toro - District 1
Kelly J. Chastain - District 2
Dr. Luis S. Gonzalez - District 3
John R. Echevarria - District 4

City Treasurer Aurelio De La Torre

City Manager William R. Smith
City Attorney Carlos Campos
City Clerk Carolina R. Padilla

AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL,

COLTON UTILITY AUTHORITY, COLTON PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY,

COLTON HOUSING AUTHORITY

REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2023 – 5:00 P.M.

CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 p.m.

CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER

ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENT - Closed Session
This is the portion of the meeting specifically set aside to invite your comments regarding Closed Session items and other general comments about matters not on the agenda; however, any matter that requires action will be referred to staff for investigation and report at a subsequent Council meeting. The Council is prohibited by law from discussing or taking immediate action on items during this public comment period.

Persons desiring to submit paperwork to the City Council Members shall provide copy of any paperwork to the City Clerk for the Official Record.

Speakers will be limited to 3 minutes; provided, however, that the presiding officer shall have certain discretion to extend or limit time as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure.

2 A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
City of Colton v. Inland Memorial Cremational and Burial Society, Inc., et al.

San Bernardino Superior Court, Case No. CIVSB2300169

CITY ATTORNEY ORAL REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS

RULES OF DECORUM

To help conduct the business of the City Council in an orderly fashion, the City Council has adopted rules pertaining to decorum and order, as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure. The City Council will strictly enforce these rules in order to allow full expression of ideas and opinions by councilmembers, staff and the public. Generally, the City's rules of decorum prohibit comments or actions which willfully disrupt the meeting. All remarks and questions shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any particular member. No individual Councilmember or member of the City staff shall be questioned without first obtaining permission from the Presiding Officer. The City Council asks that all persons - including councilmembers, staff and the public - act and speak respectfully.

OPEN SESSION
6:00 P.M.

OPEN SESSION CALLED TO ORDER
INVOCATION Pastor Scott Thibodo- Centerpoint Church FLAG SALUTE American Legion Post 155 Members Louie Barrera and Steve Ferrance

ROLL CALL

CEREMONIAL MATTERS
Presentations, Awards, Proclamations

MAYOR AND COUNCIL ITEMS

GIFT DISCLOSURES
Prior to rendering a decision in any proceeding involving a license, permit, contract or other entitlement pending before the City Council, any Council Member who has received been prom ised a gift or gifts aggregating $50.00 or more in value within the preceding twelve months from a party or participant in the proceeding shall disclose that fact either orally or in writing during open session. This disclosure shall be made part of the official public record of the proceeding, either as part of the minutes of the meeting or as a separate writing filed with the city. (CMC Section 2.04.030) AB 1234 ORAL REPORTS
Members of the City Council shall provide brief reports on meetings attended at the expense of the city. (GC Section 53232.3(d))

3 APPOINTMENTS
 Code Compliance and Housing Appeals Board (CCHAB) - District 2 - Hugh Forbes

MAYOR AND COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEMS
 Discussion and Possible Direction to Staff Regarding the Municipal Code Pertai ning to Appointment of Commissioners, CMC 2.30 (Councilmember Gonzalez).
 Discussion and Possible Direction to Staff Regarding the Formation of a New City Committee (Councilmember Echevarria)
 Discussion Regarding Measure S Funding (Councilmember Echevarria).

PUBLIC HEARINGS
To speak on public hearing items, it is requested that you obtain a card from the City Clerk and complete it by noting the agenda item number, as well as whether you are in favor, opposition or neither, and give it to the City Clerk. The applicant will be allowed 5 minutes to address the Council and all other persons will be allowed 3 minutes; provided, however, that the presiding officer shall have certain discretion to extend or limit time as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure. (1) Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text Amendment - TIME AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER A PUBLIC HEARING TO INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. O -01-23, AN ORDINANCE OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND, CERTAIN SECTIONS IN CHAPTERS

18.04; 18.06; 18.24, 18.26, 18.28, AND 18.48 OF TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE COLTON MUNICIPAL CODE

RELATED TO DEFINITIONS, PERMITTED USES, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE I -P (INDUSTRIAL PARK), M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M-2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) ZONES, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS (FILE INDEX NO.

DAP-001-697), ORDINANCE NO. O-01-23.
[Staff Person: Mark Tomich]
Mayor announces the Public Hearing Open.

City Clerk submits the Affidavit of Publication and reports on protests or objections thereto.

Staff Presentation.

Public Comment.

After hearing public comment, on motion by Councilmember __________, seconded by Councilmember _________, the Public Hearing is terminated.

MOTION __________ SECOND __________

4 (2) Public Hearing - CDBG Projects - TIME AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER A PUBLIC HEARING TO APPROVE

AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE LIST OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)

PROJECTS FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, RESOLUTION NO. R-10-23.
[Staff Person: Bill Smith]
Mayor announces the Public Hearing Open.

City Clerk submits the Affidavit of Publication and reports on protests or objections thereto.

Staff Presentation.

Public Comment.

After hearing public comment, on motion by Councilmember __________, seconded by Councilmember _________, the Public Hearing is terminated.

MOTION __________ SECOND __________

(3) Approve 2022 Citywide Engineering and Traffic (Speed) Survey - TIME AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER A PUBLIC HEARING TO INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. O -2-23, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE 2022 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC (SPEED) SURVEY, ORDINANCE NO. O-02-23.
[Staff Person: Brian Dickinson]
Mayor announces the Public Hearing Open.

City Clerk submits the Affidavit of Publication and reports on protests or objections thereto.

Staff Presentation.

Public Comment.

After hearing public comment, on motion by Councilmember ____ ______, seconded by Councilmember _________, the Public Hearing is terminated.

MOTION __________ SECOND __________

BUSINESS ITEMS
There are no Business Items scheduled for this meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT Limit 3 Minutes
This is the portion of the meeting specifically set aside to invite your comments regarding Consent Calendar items and other general comments about matters not on the agenda; however, any matter that requires action will be referred to staff for investigation and report at a subsequent Council meeting. The Council is prohibited by law from discussing or taking immediate action on items during this public comment period.

Persons desiring to submit paperwork to the City Council Members shall provide copy of any paperwork to the City Clerk for the Official Record.

Speakers will be limited to 3 minutes; provided, however, that the presiding officer shall have certain discretion to extend or limit time as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure.

5 CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will all be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time the City Council votes on the motion, unless councilmembers, staff or the public request that specific items be discussed and/or removed for separate discussions or action.

(4) Minutes - Approval of Minutes for the City Council Special Meeting held on December 12, 2022, and Approval of Minutes for the City Council Regular Meeting held on January 17, 2023. [Staff Person: Carolina Padilla]
(5) Warrants - Approve US Bank voucher dated 12/30/2022 totaling $53,924.39; voucher numbers 203158 to 203233 dated 12/22/2022 and totaling $310,823.43; voucher numbers 203234 to 2033 14 dated 12/28/2022 and totaling $77,332.31; voucher numbers 203315 to 203422 dated 12/29/2022 and totaling $1,252,120.77; voucher numbers 203423 to 203488 dated 01/05/2023 and totaling $3,619,077.22 and a payroll disbursement listing dated 11/12/2022 to 11/25/2022 and totaling $1,045,172.97. [Staff Person: Stacey Dabbs]
(6) City Treasurer's Report - Receive and File Treasurer's Report for October 2022. [Staff Person: Aurelio De La Torre]
(7) Contract Amendment - RDO Equipment Company - Approve Additional Funds for RDO Equipment Co. for the Amount of $29,600 for Current and Future Repair and Service Needs. [Staff Person: Brian Dickinson]
(8) Contract Award - Performance Construction & Painting - Award Construction Contract to Performance Construction & Painting for Restroom/Shower Room Remodel at Fire Station 212. [Staff Person: Brian Dickinson]
(9) Contract Award - Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. - Award of Engineering Design Contract to Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. for the Colton Avenue Bike Path Improvement Project. [Staff Person: Brian Dickinson]
(10) Contract Amendment - Lilburn Corporation and Reimbursement Agreement Amendment - Iglesia de Cristo- Elim - Approve and Adopt a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Lilburn Corporation for Environmental Services on Behalf of Hossana Village Apartments and Amendment to Reimbursement Agreement with Applicant.
[Staff Person: Mark Tomich]
(11) Contract Amendment - First Carbon Solutions - Approve and Adopt a Second Amendment to the Agreement for Environmental Services with First Carbon Solutions, Inc. for the Agua Mansa Logistics Center Project, including Amendment to Reimbursement Agreement. [Staff Person: Mark Tomich]
(12) Contract Amendment & Reimbursement Agreement Amendment - LSA Associates - Approve Fourth Amendment of a Professional Services Agreement with LSA Associates for Environmental Services on Behalf of the Reche Canyon Plaza Project and Amendment to Reimbursement Agreement with Appl icant. [Staff Person: Mark Tomich]
(13) Contract Amendment - PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. - Approve a Contract Amendment (Change Order No. 1) to PTM General Engineering Services, Inc., for the I-10 and 9th St. Underpass Lighting Project. [Staff Person: Brian Dickinson]

6 (14) Contract Amendment - Three Peaks Corp. - Approve a Contract Amendment (Change Order No. 1) for Three Peaks Corp. for the Downtown Paseo Project.
[Staff Person: Brian Dickinson]
(15) Purchase - National Auto Fleet Group - Approve the Purchase of a New 2023 Ford F-750 Dump Truck through National Auto Fleet Group for the Water Utilities Division of the Public Works & Utilities Department.
[Staff Person: Brian Dickinson]
(16) Grant - Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) - Approve City Manager Authority to Accept 2022 Justice Assistance Grant Award (JAG) and the Accompanying Interlocal Agreement, Approve Resolution and Purchase of Off - Highway Vehicle and Related Emergency Equipment, RESOLUTION NO. R-08-23. [Staff Person: Hank Dominguez]
(17) Grant - California Department of Water Resources - Approve and Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Application for a Grant through the California Department of Water Resources, RESOLUTION NO. R-09-23. [Staff Person: Brian Dickinson]

MAYOR AND COUNCIL ORAL REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Comments from Mayor and Council on various issues and activities throughout the community. Comments shall be limited to 5 Minutes per speaker.

CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS

ADJOURNMENT

7 I, Stephanie Vargas, the Deputy City Clerk, hereby certify that a true and correct, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted , at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2, at the following locations:

City of Colton City Hall 650 N. La Cadena Drive
City of Colton Website, www.coltonca.gov <http://www.coltonca.gov>

PROCEDURES FOR ADDRESSING CITY COUNCIL

For the Official Record, it is requested that you obtain a card from the City Clerk and complete it by noting a specific item number on the Agenda, if applicable, or you can identify the subject that you wish to address under the Public Comment portion of the Agenda. The City Council encourages public input on all City issues within the Rules of Decorum. Speakers will be limited to the time periods pro vided on the Agenda; provided, however, that the presiding officer shall have certain discretion to extend or limit time as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure.

RULES OF DECORUM

To help conduct the business of the City Council in an orde rly fashion, the City Council has adopted rules pertaining to decorum and order, as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure. The City Council will strictly enforce these rules in order to allow full expression of ideas and opinions by council members, staff and the public. Generally, the City's rules of decorum prohibit comments or actions which willfully disrupt the meeting. All remarks and questions shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any particular member. No individual Councilmember or member of the City staff shall be questioned without first obtaining permission from the Presiding Officer. The City Council asks that all persons - including councilmembers, staff and the public - act and speak respectfully.

NOTICE TO PUBLIC

Staff reports or other written documentation relating to each item referred to, on the Agenda, are available for public inspection at the following locations: Office of the City Clerk, 650 N. La Cadena Drive, Colton, CA; City of Colton Public Lib rary, 656 9 th St., Colton, CA; or the City of Colton Internet Website, www.coltonca.gov. Any person having questions concerning any item on the Agenda may call the City Clerk at 370 -5191 to make inquiry concerning t he nature of the item described on the Agenda. The City Clerk shall direct inquiries to the appropriate office.

All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will all be enacted by one motion. There wil l be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time the City Council votes on the motion, unless councilmembers, staff or the public request that specific items be discussed and/or removed for separate discussions or action.

In compliance with th e American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City Meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 909 -370-5001. Notification

8 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to e nsure accessibility to this meeting.

LEGAL CHALLENGES

If you challenge in court any discussion or action taken concerning an item on this Agenda, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised during the meeting or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the City's consideration of the item at the meeting.

MANUAL OF PROCEDURE

The City Council adopted its Manual of Procedure pursuant to Resolution No. R -150-07; Amended by Minute Action on December 2, 20 14 and adopted by Resolution No. R -03-15 on January 20, 2015. Copies are available in the Office of the City Clerk.

ITEM NO. 1

STAFF REPORT

DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: MARK TOMICH, DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TIME AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER A PUBLIC HEARING TO INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. O-01-23, AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON,

CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND, CERTAIN SECTIONS IN CHAPTERS

18.04; 18.06; 18.24, 18.26, 18.28, AND 18.48 OF TITLE 18 (ZONING)

OF THE COLTON MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO DEFINITIONS,

PERMITTED USES, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE I-P
(INDUSTRIAL PARK), M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M-2
(HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) ZONES, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS (FILE
INDEX NO. DAP-001-697), ORDINANCE NO. O-01-23.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

1. Waive Full Reading. Read by Title Only and Introduce First Reading Ordinance No. O-01-23 entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON TO AMEND, CERTAIN SECTIONS IN CHAPTERS 18.04; 18.0 6; 18.24, 18.26, 18. 28, AND 18.48 OF TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE COLTON MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO DE FINITIONS,

PERMITTED USES, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE I-P (INDUSTRIAL PARK), M- 1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M -2 (HEAVY INDU STRIAL) ZONES, AND S PECIAL PROVISIONS (FILE INDEX NO. DAP-001-697).

2. PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM FOR AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF ONE YEAR.

1.1 Packet Pg. 9
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text Amendment February 7, 2023

BACKGROUND

On May 4, 2021, the City Council adopted a 45-day Moratorium, Ordinance No. O-03-21, on the establishment, expansion, or modification of war ehouses, distribution centers, truck storage facilities and related uses within industrial zones.

On June 15, 2021, the City Council approved Ordinance No. O-05-21, extending the Moratorium for an additional ten months and fifteen days – ending on May 23, 2022. The City Council also established the Ad -Hoc Committee for the Moratorium , appointing CM Suchil, MPT Cisneros, and directed the Director of Development Services to have the Planning Commission select two members to sit on the Ad-Hoc Committee. On July 13, 2021, the Planning Commission voted by consensus to appoint two members to the Committee with one alternate: Garry Grossich, Angel Delgado, and Adam Raymond (Alternate)

The Ad-Hoc Committee met four times and directed staff to hold a community me eting and a meeting with the industrial warehouse sector (real estate agents/brokers and developers). Staff held three meeting s: one meeting with the industrial warehouse sector and two meetings with members of the community in 2021. Many of the comments received from each of the public outreach meeting were carried forward i nto the proposed Zoning Ordinance text amendment (“ZTA”). These additional amendment items requested by the Ad -Hoc Committee and community input included a Conditional Use Permit requirement for warehouse and truck - related uses, prohibiting Truck/Trailer Storage uses in the I -P (Industrial Park) and M -1 (Light Industrial) Zones, and adding substantial new development standards for such uses.

On January 18, 2022, staff presented the Ad-Hoc Committee’s recommendations to the City Council for discussion and direction. The City Council accepted the recommendations and directed staff to move forward with their implementation, including related Code amendments to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation to the City Council.

On March 22, 2022, the Planning Commission approved by a 4 -0-2 vote, Resolution No. R -01- 22, recommending City Council approval of various zoning text amendments as amended related to warehouses, business parks, truck and trailer storage/parking uses amending various sections of the Zoning Code.

On April 5, 2022, The City Council reviewed a proposed Zoning Text Amendment prepared by staff as recommended by the Ad-Hoc Committee. After a brief presentation of the ordinance and discussion by the City Council, the City Council voted to return the Draft Ordinance to the Ad - Hoc Committee to clarify setbacks , size of industrial warehouses, and bui lding placement of truck docks. Attachment 1 is a copy of the Apri l 5, 2022, City Council staff report including background information on the warehouse moratorium.

On May 3, 2 022, the City Council completed public noticing to extend the warehouse moratorium for an additional year, expiring on May 3, 2023.

1.1 Packet Pg. 10
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text Amendment February 7, 2023

On May 16, 2 022, staff presented clarifying language to the Ad -Hoc Committee for discussion and direction. The Ad -Hoc Committee approved staff recommendations on definition, building placement of truck docks , and setbacks and directed staff to incorporate the finished language within a memorandum with final language updates to present to the City Council.

On June 2, 2022, staff forwarded a copy of the latest Ordinance changes to the Ad -Hoc Committee. The Ad -Hoc Committee had no further comments. The updated Ordin ance, O-01- 23, is contained in Attachment 2 of this staff report.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
The Following is a summary of comments by City Council members from the April 5, 2022 City Council hearing on the proposed warehouse standards Zoning Text Amendment, includi ng staff comments and recommendations (The red fonts are the most recent changes to the ordinance):

 City Council directed staff to review the definition of “General Warehousing” with the Ad- Hoc Committee in order to clarify the size of a warehouse requirement.

Staff comment: This comment pertains to Zoning Code Section 18.04.454. The original proposal was to limit the size of “general warehouse” buildings to 45% lot coverage.

However, after further review staff is recommending a maximum of .50 Floor A rea Ratio (FAR) per acre. This would result in a maximum size 21,780 square feet per acre (and per building) for a “general warehouse.” The intent of this maximum FAR is to restrict future larger logistics / distribution centers to the M-2 (Heavy Industrial) Zone instead of permitting them in the IP (Industrial Park) and M -1 (Light Industrial) zones , as well. Future large distribution centers such as the recently approved 450,000 square foot and greater industrial buildings recently approved on Barton R oad are located in the M -1 Zone. Larger warehouse buildings would also require a Conditional Use Permit within the M-2 Zone.

18.04.454. Warehouse, General. “ Warehouse, General” means the use of a building primarily for the storage of goods of any type by one or two businesses and used for the sale or distribution of those goods to their direct customers (excluding bulk storage of materials which are flammable or explosive or which create hazardous or commonly recognized offensive conditions). The maximum lot coverage of 45 percent floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.5 and may not exceed 98,010 21,780 square feet coverage per acre with a maximum building size of 108,900 square feet with dock high and/or ground level loading doors restricted to one one side of the building.

1.1 Packet Pg. 11
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text Amendment February 7, 2023

 City Council directed staff to review Building Placement draft code requirement related to size and distance of warehouses greater than “x” square feet in size from sensitive receptors, including the location of the truck dock doors. The proposed code requirement specifies that loading dock doors shall be placed a minimum of 300 feet from the property line of a sensitive receptor to the nearest dock door which does not exclusively serve electric trucks (using a straight line method for setback measurement).

Staff comment: This comment pertains to Zoning Code Section 18.348.134 B. Staff is recommending that the minimum setback from sensitive receptor properties be 300 feet.

Based on comments from the City Council, staff recommends tha t the Ad -Hoc Committee determine whether the minimum distance between loading dock doors and sensitive uses should be 300, 400, 500, or 1000 feet. Below is the specific section that City Council requested be reviewed further with final recommended changes:

B. Building Placement.

1. For any warehouse greater than 107,811 108,900 square feet in size, the building loading dock shall be located a minimum of three -hundred (300) feet from the property line of the sensitive receptor to the nearest dock door which does not exclusively serve electric trucks (setback measurements shall use a straight line method).

 In addition, the City Council had questions as to whether front setbacks should be 20, 30, 40, or 50 feet.

Staff comment: This comment pertains to Zonin g Code Sections 18.24.100 (I-P), 18.26.100 (M-1) and 18.28.100 (M-2) B. Each of the industrial zones currently requires a minimum 20 feet front yard setback. Staff solicited comments on the front setback standards from Ad-hoc Committee and recommended retention of the existing minimum setback or an alternative.

Moratorium – Status and Next Steps

The Moratorium will expire on May 3, 2023 unless the City Council determines that the Moratorium should be terminated earlier. With approval of this Zoning Tex t Amendment, the following direction from the City Council and Ad-Hoc Committee have been addressed:

 Process Zoning Text Amendments to address warehouse and truck-related impacts.  Hire an additional Code Compliance Officer to focus on enforcement of non -conforming businesses
 For all Development Agreement and/or Public Benefit Agreement negotiations, contract with a consultant to assist with negotiations on behalf of the City. Comment: The City is currently

1.1 Packet Pg. 12
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text Amendment February 7, 2023

utilizing a BB&K attorney with specialized Develo pment Agreement expertise for assistance in these negotiations.

The following action items from the Ad -Hoc Committee and City Council are in process and remain to be completed:

 Review the City’s current Truck Route Plan (adopted in 2016) and modify as ne cessary to ensure the safety of Colton residents. Comment: The Truck Route Plan is currently being reviewed by Public Works/Engineering and modifications, if warranted, will be submitted at a later date.
 Adopt “Reach Codes” for non -residential industrial buildings. Comment: Reach Codes are amendments to the Energy and Green Building Standards Codes to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A Reach Code amendment would expand requirements for electrification and energy efficiency for new construction projects . Due to the corresponding increase in building plan review time and increase in Building fees associated with such Code adoption, staff are reviewing options to adopt Reach Codes, or some variation thereof, in order to reduce costs to the City and our applicants.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION

The subject Zoning Text Amendment is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and Sections 15060(b)(3) because it will not result in a direct or reasonably fore seeable indirect physical change in the environment, and the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The proposed amendments propose regulatory and administrative amendments to the zoning code. Additional environmental review will be conducted for individual projects that are affected by this code amendment.

FISCAL IMPACTS

No fiscal impacts are associated with this Municipal Code Amendment to Title 18 (Zoning Code) of the City of Colton.

ALTERNATIVES

Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT

1. Attachment 1_April 5, 2022, City Council Staff Report Cover

2. Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft

1.1 Packet Pg. 13

ITEM NO. 1

STAFF REPORT

DATE: APRIL 5, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: MARK TOMICH, DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TIME AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER A PUBLIC HEARING TO INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. O-06-22, AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON,

CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND, CERTAIN SECTIONS IN CHAPTERS

18.04; 18.06; 18.24, 18.26, 18.28, AND 18.48 OF TITLE 18 (ZONING)

OF THE COLTON MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO DEFINITIONS,

PERMITTED USES, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE I-P
(INDUSTRIAL PARK), M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M-2
(HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) ZONES, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS (FILE
INDEX NO. DAP-001-697), ORDINANCE NO. O-06-22.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

1. Waive Full Reading. Read by Title Only and Introduce First Reading Ordinance No. O-06-22 entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON TO AMEND, CERTAIN SECTIONS IN CHAPTERS 18.04; 18.0 6; 18.24, 18.26, 18. 28, AND 18. 48 OF TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE COLTON MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO DE FINITIONS,

PERMITTED USES, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE I-P (INDUSTRIAL PARK), M- 1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M -2 (HEAVY INDU STRIAL) ZONES, AND S PECIAL PROVISIONS (FILE INDEX NO. DAP-001-697).

2. PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM FOR AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF ONE YEAR.

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Attachment 1_April 5, 2022, City Council Staff Report Cover (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking ZTA and Direction Regarding Moratorium Extension
April 5, 2022

BACKGROUND

Since 2013, the City has initiated a number of amendments of several Zoning Code (Title 18 of the Municipal Code). The various amendments have generally been grouped to address various topics into single, unified code text amendments. The amendments were prepared for the following purposes:
 Provide clarity to implement existing regulations.
 Provide internal consistency with other code regulations.  Allow greater flexibility for certain standards.
 Address potential negative impacts from specified uses.

The adopted zoning text amendments are summarized in the table below:

Year Zoning Text Amendments
2013 DAP-001-095 – Cleanup Phase 1 - Amending various sections for general plan consistency 2014 DAP-001-133 – Disbanding Design Review Committee (DRC) 2014 DAP-001-147 – Emergency shelters, transitional housing, 2014 DAP-001-184 – Cleanup Phase 2-A - Amending various sections including adding hillside preservation, compact lot divisions
2015 DAP-001-248 – Adult Use Regulations
2016 DAP-001-277 – Cleanup Phase 2-B – Amend & Expand SDA-O, Sensitive Development Overlay, zone
2016 DAP-001-283 – Marijuana cultivation
2016 DAP-001-287 – Expand Public Noticing
2016 DAP-001-301 – Off-premise signage (billboards)
2016 DAP-001-307 – Create C-2, D-O, Downtown Overlay Zone 2016 DAP-001-314 – Allow R-1 Carports in Front Setback
2016 DAP-001-325 – Add Minor CUP
2016 DAP-001-360 – Personal, Medical, & Commercial Marijuana Uses 2017 DAP-001-386 – Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)
2017 DAP-001-388 – Residential Indoor Marijuana Cultivation (Personal Use) 2017 DAP-001-426 – Commercial Marijuana Cultivation & Overlay Zone 2017 DAP-001-431 – Electric Fences
2017 DAP-001-441 – Sign Code - Public Benefit Amendment 2018 DAP-001-502 – Appeals
2018 DAP-001-504 – Cleanup Phase 3 – Various code amendments 2018 DAP-001-514 – Deemed Approved Nonconforming Alcohol Licenses 2019 DAP-001-573 – Marijuana Cultivation
2019 DAP-001-586 – Cleanup Phase 4 – Various code amendments 2020 DAP-001-638 – Electric Fences
2020 DAP-001-650 – ADUs and JADUs
2020 DAP-001- 671 – Marijuana Candidate Sites (MCS) Overlay on La Crosse Avenue 2020 DAP-001-673 – Phase 4A – Animal Daycare, congregate care, R-1 Landscaping & other clean-ups

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Attachment 1_April 5, 2022, City Council Staff Report Cover (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking ZTA and Direction Regarding Moratorium Extension
April 5, 2022

Year Zoning Text Amendments
2022 DAP-001-697 – Phase 5 – Warehouses, Business Park & Truck & Trailer Storage/Parking

Due to the recent and rapid expansion of industrial developments within the City and neighboring communities, particularly the development and expansion of warehouses, Colton residents and businesses have experienced various adverse impacts related to these industrial developments, including incompatibility with adjacent uses, increased truck traffic, damage to local streets, and deteriorating air quality and environmental health. In particular, the City Council has determined that the placement of these warehouses, distribution centers, and logistics facilities, including related uses such as truck storage facili ties within the City are a current and immediate threat to public health, safety, and welfare. In response to these concerns, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance O -03-21 on May 4, 2021, establishing a 45 -day moratorium on warehouses and truck storag e facilities. A “10-day report” with a draft work plan was approved on June 1, 2021, and on June 15, 2021, the Urgency Ordinance was extended to May 3, 2022 (Ordinance O -05-21). The Urgency Ordinance prohibits the approval of any uses, facilities, or impro vements that may conflict with a contemplated zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission, or the Development Services Department (“Planning Department”) is considering or studying or intends to study within this timeframe. Staff has been using this timeframe to work with the City’s “Warehouse Moratorium Ad -Hoc Committee” to formulate recommendations to address the adverse impacts that led to adoption of the Urgency Ordinance (Attachment 1). The Ad -Hoc Committee members, as appointed by the C ity Council and Planning Commission, consist of the following members:

Council Member, Ernest Cisneros (District 2)
Council Member, Isaac Suchil (District 6)
Planning Commission Vice Chair, Gary Grossich (District 4) Planning Commissioner, Angel Delgado (District 3)
The Ad -Hoc Committee held three meetings at which staff presented research data and recommendations to the Committee which then provided comments and direction to staff:

August 23, 2021, September 29, 2021 and November 22, 2021. In a ddition, staff conducted the following outreach meetings with community members and industry stakeholders:

Industry Stakeholders Meeting: August 19, 2021
Community Stakeholders Meeting #1: October 21, 2021
Community Stakeholders Meeting #2: November 3, 2021
Summaries of the three meetings are attached to this report (Attachments 2-4).

On January 18, 2022, staff presented recommendations by the Ad -Hoc Committee to the City Council. After a presentation and some discussion, the City Council unanimo usly approved the

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Attachment 1_April 5, 2022, City Council Staff Report Cover (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking ZTA and Direction Regarding Moratorium Extension
April 5, 2022

Warehouse Moratorium Ad-Hoc Committee’s recommendations, which includes the zoning text amendments brought forward in this staff report.

Other areas such as the Building Code amendments (“Reach Codes”), Community Facilities District am endments and Truck Route Map will be moving forward at a later date contingent upon approval of the FY 2022-23 budget.

On March 22, 2022, the Planning Commission approved by a 4-0-2 vote, Resolution No.

R-01-22, recommending City Council approval of var ious zoning text amendments as amended related to warehouses, business parks, truck and trailer storage/parking uses amending, Title 18 (Zoning Code) to address various items including, but not limited to, amending certain sections in Chapters 18.04; 18.0 6; 18.24, 18.26, 18.28, and 18.48 of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code related to definitions, permitted uses, development standards in the I -P (Industrial Park), M-1 (Light Industrial) and M-2 (Heavy Industrial) Zones, and Special Provisions. The Planning Commission’s approval included two changes to the proposed ordinance:

1. Replace existing language for 1000 separation distance between warehouses and sensitive receptors to a maximum 300 feet separation between larger warehouses and sensitive receptors.

2. Specify that the effective date of this Ordinance shall automatically repeal the Warehouse Moratorium Ordinance No. O -05-21 (effective on May 5, 2022 if first reading of the Ordinance is conducted at today’s meeting).

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

A. Measures to Add ress Warehouse Distribution Centers, Truck Storage Facilities and Related Uses

The Ad-Hoc Committee has recommended a series of specific Zoning Code and Building Code amendments, policy initiatives and focused studies for consideration by the City Council , at large. A summary of t he Committee’s recommendations are provided below, along with staff comments.

1. Zoning Text Amendments
The recommended amendments are summarized in the table below, which are described in more detail in Attachment 1 to this re port (Planning Commission Resolution) , and in the draft Ordinance (Attachment 2).

The summary table below provides a list of topics and a brief summary of the proposed changes:

Topic Summary

1. New Definitions New definitions for general warehouse, warehouse logistics and distribution and sensitive receptors of Chapter 18.04 (Definitions)

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Attachment 1_April 5, 2022, City Council Staff Report Cover (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking ZTA and Direction Regarding Moratorium Extension
April 5, 2022

Topic Summary

2. Permitted Uses Table
Industrial Uses – Table G of 18.06 is updated to include specified industrial uses with conditional use permit; compliance with special provisions and prohibiting warehouses logistics distribution and truck/trailer storage and parking within I-P and M-1 Zones.

3. Industrial Zones
I-P, M-1, & M-2 Zones amended to include additional compliance with special provisions for specified uses and clarification of landscape requirements specifically for truck and trailer storage and parking areas.

4. Special Provisions Added various standards for business park, truck and trailer storage and parking; general warehouses, warehouse logistics and distribution projects

Comment: The land use table update and special provisions provide additional protections and prohibitions for larger logistics and distribution projects, along with new conditional use permit requirements for all industrial warehouse pr ojects and truck and trailer storage/parking areas.

Smaller general warehouse projects, 45% lot coverage with maximum size of 98,010 square feet .

Larger warehouses, buildings over 107,811 square feet, will have to meet the 300 to 800 foot separation standards. The methodology in arriving at the 107,811 square feet was made to differentiate a large warehouse from general warehouses. A general warehouse is defined as a building that is a maximum of 98,010 square feet. The 10% difference is provided to give some flexibility or “wiggle room” for a request to increase a general warehouse building size by a 10% through a minor deviation.

The 98,010 square feet building size was calculated by using a 45 percent lot coverage of a one - acre lot multiplied by 5 (5 acres), which then provided a 107,811 square foot building size which is used to differentiate the larger logistics and distribution warehouse from the general warehouse.

2. Building Code Amendments

 Adopt “Reach Codes” for nonresidential industrial buildings.

Comment: Reach Codes are amendments to the Energy and Green Building Standards Codes to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A Reach Codes ordinance would expand requirements for electrification and energy efficiency for new construction projects . This amendment can be conducted concurrent with the 2022 Building Code update, scheduled for late 2022.

3. Review the City’s current Truck Route Plan (adopted in 2016), and modify as necessary to ensure the safety of Colton residents.

Comment: This study of truck routes and revisions, as needed, would be conducted by Public Works/Engineering Division.

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Attachment 1_April 5, 2022, City Council Staff Report Cover (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking ZTA and Direction Regarding Moratorium Extension
April 5, 2022

4. Hire (or reassign) a Code Compliance Officer to Development Services to assist with enforcement of non-conforming businesses.

Comment: Code Compl iance Officers currently provide enforcement services for residential, commercial and industrial properties. Focusing the duties of one Officer on non -conforming businesses is feasible, including zoning enforcement, business occupancy permits, business licenses, conditions of approval and CEQA mitigation monitoring. However, based on input from the Police Department, assigning one Officer solely to business enforcement activities would necessitate hiring of an additional Code Officer. Rather than divide rep orting relationships and department functions, staff recommended that the all Code Compliance Officers remain with the Police Department, but continue to closely coordinate with Business License, Building & Safety, and Planning.

5. For all Development Ag reement and/or Public Benefit Agreement negotiations, the City should contract with a consultant to conduct negotiations on behalf of the City and ensure maximum public benefits.

B. Consideration of Moratorium Extension

The current Moratorium on warehouse d istribution centers, truck storage facilities and related uses will expire on May 3, 2022. Based on direction from the Planning Commission, staff has inserted language into the draft ZTA Ordinance to automatically repeal Moratorium upon the effective date of the ZTA (May 5, 2022 if first reading is conducted at this meeting).

Although adoption of the Ordinance presented herein will address many of the environmental and quality of life issues identified by the City Council in adopting the Moratorium, sta ff has not yet finished its work in this regard. Remaining Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations to be implemented include adoption of the “Reach Codes” to reduce greenhouse gas emissions ; reviewing the City’s Truck Route Plan and modifying, as needed; hiring (or reassigning) a Code Compliance Officer to focus on enforcement of non -conforming businesses; securing a consultant to assist with Development Agreement negotiations ; and amending the methodology for calculating Community Facilities District assessments on truck storage facilities. Should the City Council desire to extend the Moratorium to allow staff to address the remaining recommendations of the Ad -Hoc Committee, it may extend the Moratorium for an additional period of one year, pursuant to Government Code section 65858(a) to May 3, 2023.

If the City Council directs staff to extend the Moratorium, staff will return with an amendment to extend the Moratorium Ordinance for consideration at a public hearing to be held on April 19, 2022.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Attachment 1_April 5, 2022, City Council Staff Report Cover (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking ZTA and Direction Regarding Moratorium Extension
April 5, 2022

The subject Zoning Text Amendment is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and Sections 15060(b)(3) because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The proposed amendments propose regulatory and administrative amendments to the zoning code. Additional environmental review will be conducted for individual projects that are affected by this code amendment.

FISCAL IMPACTS

No fiscal impacts are associated with this Municipal Code Amendment to Title 18 (Zoning Code) of the City of Colton.

ALTERNATIVES

Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT

1. Attachment 1_PC Reso No. R-01-22_DAP-001-697

2. Attachment 2_Ord No. O-06-22

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Attachment 1_April 5, 2022, City Council Staff Report Cover (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1

ORDINANCE NO. O-01-23

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA, AMEND CERTAIN SECTIONS IN CHAPTERS 18.04; 18.06; 18.24, 18.26,

18.28, AND 18.48 OF TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE COLTON MUNICIPA L CODE

RELATED TO DEFINITIO NS, PERMITTED U SES, DEVELOPMENT STA NDARDS IN THE I -P (INDUSTRIAL PARK), M -1 (LIGHT IN DUSTRIAL) AND M -2 (H EAVY INDUSTRIAL) ZONES, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS (FILE INDEX NO. DAP-001-697).

WHEREAS, on March 22, 202 2, the Planning Commission of the City of Colton (“Planning Co mmission”) conducted a duly noticed public hearing and recommended the City Council of the City of Colton (“City Council”) amend Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code (the “Municipal Code”). Following the conclusion of said hearing, the Planning Commissio n adopted their Resolution No. R -01-22, recommending approval to the City Council to amend (“Zoning Text Amendment”) Chapters 18.04; 18.06; 18.24, 18.26, 18.28, and 18.48 of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has deter mined that the Zoning Text Amendment is consistent with the City of Colton General Plan (“General Plan”) as indicated below; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed Zoning Text Amendment is in the best interests of the City, and th at it would be in the public interest to approve the Zone Text Amendment; and

WHEREAS, the City Council appointed Warehouse Moratorium Ad-Hoc Committee met four times to discuss, review and provide direction to staff in the crafting of the zoning text amendment taking into account comments received from the public outreach efforts made by the City;
WHEREAS, the City Staff met held three public outreach meetings with industrial sector representatives and community meetings with Colton residents and interest ed parties. The Ad - Hoc Committee and staff considered and included many of the comments received in the proposed ordinance;

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 2 -

WHEREAS, the Zoning Text Amendment was reviewed, studied and found exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) as more fully described below; and

WHEREAS, on February 7, 2023 the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at which persons wishing to testify in connection with the Zoning Text Amendment were heard and the Zoning Text Amendment was comprehensively reviewed.

WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts the recitals and findings set forth above and in the agenda report prepared in connection with this Ordinance.

SECTION 2. General Plan Consistency. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, including the staff report and the findings made in this Ordinance, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the proposed Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Colton General Plan and is reasonably related to the public welfare of the citizens of the C ity and surrounding regions. The Zoning Text Amendment is necessary to provide clarity to implement existing regulations, provide consistency with other code regulations, allow flexibility to certain standards, and address potential negative impacts. Speci fically, provisions in the ordinance address the following General Plan policies:

Land Use Element:
o Policy LU -1.1: “Ensure that all new development conforms to all applic able provisions of the General Plan and Zoning Code.” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development proposal to ensure consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Code as proposed herein with chapters 18.04 (Definitions) ; 18.06 (Permitted Uses) ; 18.24 (Industrial Park ); 18.26 (M-1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M-2 Heavy Industrial) ; and 18.48 (Special Provisions)

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 3 -

including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions.

o Policy LU -1.6: “Ensure that new development project s are compatible with permitted, well-maintained uses and buildings in the surrounding neighborhood or district.” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definition s), 1806 (Permitted Uses),

18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions.

o Policy LU‐1.8 : “Interpret the Land Use Plan in a manner that provides for compatibility between adjacent land uses, and that allows the City to achieve land use, design, and economic development objectives.” The proposed zoning text amendments provide for parking, special findings and findings within a Conditional Use Permit review process to ensure projects are reviewed to be compatible within a neighborhood to achieve land use, design and economic development objectives. This includes compliance with new Special Provisions for “ warehouse logistics and distribution and truck and trailer storage and parking uses.” This include s differentiating the sizes between a General Warehouse and a Logistics and Distribution Warehouse. The maximum size of a General Warehouse at 98,010 square feet was derived by using the existing 45 percent typical lot coverage of an acre and multiplying it by 5 (5 -acre equivalent), which is the min imum size of sites developed for warehouse purposes . An additional 10 percent was added to the maximum square footage (as permitted through the Minor Modification process in the Zoning Code) to , arriv e at a minimum size for a Logistics and Distribution to be 107,811 square feet in area.

o Goal LU -19: “ Minimize conflicts between industrial activity and residential neighborhoods in South Colton .” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 4 -

existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M-2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including a dding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions.

o Policy LU‐19.1: “Require that new and expanded industrial and commercial uses adjacent to residential neighborhoods use physical design feat ures such as buffering, landscaping, setbacks, screening, operational standards, and other methods to minimize light, glare, noise, dust, odor, vibration, traffic, and other impacts. Apply the buffering approach identified in Policy LU‐8.2. ” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18 .26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and

18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions, such as new buffer separation distance requ irements between residential neighborhoods, new building placement requirements, architectural design, screening, stormwater, parking, noise, security standards, operational, air quality standards.

o Policy LU‐19.2: “Provide logical transitions between ind ustrial development and adjacent single‐ family neighborhoods through careful treatment of scale, massing, and the location of services that respond sensitively to adjacent residential uses .” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that a llows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Indus trial); and

18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions, such as new buffer separation distance requirements between residential neighborhoods, new bu ilding placement requirements, architectural design, and screening standards.

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 5 -

o Policy LU‐19.3: “ Prohibit through truck traffic on residential streets in south Colton, and develop programs, such as traffic calming, to discourage use of neighborhood streets for commercial vehicle traffic.” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 18 06 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M-1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisi ons, such as new buffer separation distance requirements between residential neighborhoods, building placement requirements, noise, operational, air quality standards.

Model Air Quality Element
o Policy 1.5: “ Support Innovative Approaches – Advocate and sup port innovative strategies to improve air quality. ” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M-2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with ne w Special Provisions, such as with new operational and air quality standards.

o Goal 4 – Land Use: “ A pattern of land uses which can be efficiently served by diversified transportation system and land development projects, which directly and indirectly generate the minimum feasible air pollutants.” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definiti ons), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M-1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions, such as allowing warehouse uses,

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 6 -

truck/trailer storage/parking in the M -2 (Heavy Industrial) zone and taking out of the M-1 (Light Industrial) and B -P (Business Park) zones. The M -1 and B -P zones are located adjacent to residential zones and not compatible with heavier industrial uses such as warehouse logistics and distribution and truck and trailer storage and parking uses. Smaller general warehouse uses will continue to be permitted in all industrial zones, but must now also comply with ne w Special Provisions including obtaining a Conditional Use Permit.

o Policy 4.3 Protect Sensitive Receptors: “Support a regional approach to regulating the location and design of land uses which are especially sensitive to air pollution.” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and sensitive receptors as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park ), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit requirement and comply with new Special Provisions. The City of Colton’s effo rts in updating its Zoning Code to more accurately be in conformance with its adopted General Plan Land Use, Mobility and Air Quality Elements and also joining many other cities/counties in the region (e.g., Jurupa Valley, Riverside, Fontana, Rialto and Riverside County) that have updated similar codes related to warehouse logistics distribution and truck and trailer storage and parking uses.

Mobility Element
o Policy M‐5.6: “Ensure that the designated truck routes conform to the following performance criteria:
 Truck routes must avoid intrusions into residential neighborhoods to limit noise, vibration, and air quality impacts.
 To the extent feasible, truck routes will not be provided on local streets and on streets with mostly residential frontage.

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 7 -

 Truck routes must be located on roadways that provide direct and convenient access between Major Arterials and freeways (I‐10 and I‐215) and industrial and commercial businesses.
 Truck routes must be located on roadways with the design and construction capacity to accommodate truck traffic.”
The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses pe rmitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses),

18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit requirement and comply with new Special Provisions , such as with standards in the Operational subsection requirement fo r a “truck route plan prepared by a licensed traffic engineer” traveling to the warehouse, business park or truck/trailer storage and parking uses and implementing and monitoring of approved truck route plan during normal business hours.

SECTION 3. Pursuant to section 18.58.050 F. of Title 18 (Zoning Code), in considering any request for a change of zone, the Commission shall review if the following conditions prevail before recommending to the City Council that the changes be granted:

Pursuant to section 18.58.050 F. of Title 18 (Zoning Code), in considering any request for a change of zone, the Commission shall review if the following conditions prevail before recommending to the City Council that the changes be granted:

1. That the proposed change of zone is in conformity with the General Plan of the City , in that the proposed changes are consistent with the existing provisions of the Colton Zoning Code and are in the public interest since they more closely conform zoning regulations with development goals and the City’s General Plan.

2. That there is a need in the community for more of the types of Uses Permitted by the zone, in that the proposed changes are being clarified with modifications to definitions within zoning district tables and within zoning stand ards/requirements further are in the public interest since they closely more closely conform zoning regulations with

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 8 -

development goals and the City’s General Plan. The proposed code amendments also includes special provisions for specified industrial uses address concerns received by the public as related to environmental impacts and adjacency compatibility issues (e.g., noise, traffic, and air quality) for larger industrial projects and truck and trailer storage and parking uses.

3. That the proposed change of zone would not adversely affect the surrounding area or the community in general, in that the proposed changes recommend clarification and addition of definitions, zoning district tables and amend portions of the Title 18 (Zoning Code) are i n the publi c interest since they more closely conform zoning regulations with City development goals and the City’s General Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives in achieving a balance of land use types that create diverse opportunities for housing, employment, and commerce.

SECTION 4. The City of Colton finds that the proposed Zone Text Amendment to permit address various items including, but not limited to: adding and/or modifying definitions, and modifying and adding certain land uses in use tables; modifying allowances for certain permitted, conditional, and prohibited land uses in various zones; and amending and adding certain regulations for definitions, permitted uses, development standards in 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 He avy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) , under specified conditions and entitlement processes, is reasonably related to the public welfare of the citizens of the City and surrounding region; more specifically, the Ordinance includes appropriate res trictions to ensure that the proposed standards meet all safety standards including Building and Safety Codes, Fire Codes and review/approval by the City Engineer.

SECTION 5. Certain sections of Chapter 18.04 (Definitions) of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code, pertaining to Definitions, are hereby amended or added to read as follows with new text shown in boldface underline ( text), deleted text shown in strikethrough ( text), updated text in bold red with existing text to remain unchanged shown withou t boldface underline nor strikethrough:

18.04. – Definitions

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 9 -

18.04.101. Business park, “business park” means a group of one or more substantially compatible and cross-supporting uses, typically in separate buildings with multiple tenant spaces, on a single parcel or multiple contiguous parcels of land that are planned, developed, and operated as an integrated site with shared common areas for such uses and supporting ancillary uses with no truck dock areas other than a rear entry door or ground level loadin g style roll up door (s). Special design attention is given to building occupancy type, circulation, parking (restaurant, warehouse, office, manufacturing, and auto repair), utility needs, aesthetics, and compatibility. Basic elements of a business park in clude, but are not limited to, the following: developments that are themed to a particular profession or discipline and contain strong branding; shared open space, parking, and amenities; architectural, design, and signage consistency; on -site management, property owners associations (POAs), governing documents such as covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R ’s), and may be held in condominium or in fee ownership.

18.04.403 Sensitive Receptors. “Sensitive Receptors” means Sensitive receptors include, but are not limited to, hospitals, schools, daycare facilities, elderly housing , residential uses, and convalescent facilities. These are areas where the occupants are more susceptible to the adverse effects of exposure to toxic chemicals, pesticides, and o ther pollutants such as noise, light/glare, truck traffic, vibration, and smells. Extra care must be taken when dealing with warehouse logistic and distribution uses, truck and trailer storage and parking use, contaminants and pollutants in close proximit y to areas recognized as sensitive receptors.

18.04.4534 - Warehousing. "Warehousing" means the Use of a Building or Buildings primarily for the storage of Goods of any type, but excluding bulk storage of Materials which are flammable or explosive or which create Hazardous or commonly recognized offensive

18.04.454. Warehouse, General. “ Warehouse, General” means Warehousing facility means the use of a building primarily for the storage of goods of any type by one or two businesses and used for the sale or distribution of those goods to their direct customers (excluding bulk storage of materials which are flammable or explosive or which create hazardous or commonly recognized offensive conditions). The maximum lot coverage

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 10 -

of 45 percent floor area ratio ( FAR) is 0.5 and may not exceed 98,010 21,780 square feet per acre with a maximum building size of 108,900 square feet with dock high and/or ground level loading doors restricted to one side of the building.

18.04.455 Warehousing, Logistics and Distribut ion. “Warehousing, logistics and distribution facility” means warehouse/distribution facilities including fulfillment centers/high cube distribution used for the storage and/or consolidation of manufactured goods (and to a lesser extent, raw materials a nd excludes bulk storage of materials, which are flammable or explosive or create hazardous or commonly recognized offensive conditions) before their distribution to retail locations or other warehouses. Warehouse/distribution centers are generally greater than 107,811 square feet in size, with a lot coverage ratio of 45 percent, and a dock -high loading door ratio of approximately 1:5,000 - 8,000 square feet. They are characterized by dock high loading doors, could be on opposing sides of the building (cross dock facility); significant movement and storage of products, materials, or equipment; truck activities frequently outside of the peak hour of the adjacent street system; and freeway access, including:
• Freight yards/forwarding terminals
• Moving agencies
• Parcel delivery terminals/Shipping/receiving yards
• Truck terminals

SECTION 5. Section 18.06.060 of Chapter 18.06 (Uses Permitted) of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code, pertaining to the Uses Permitted in Each Zone, is hereby amended to add the followin g text modifications and addition to read as follows with new text is shown in boldface underline ( text) and deleted text is shown in strikethrough ( text) with existing text to remain unchanged shown without boldface underline nor strikethrough:

G. Industrial Districts Table I-P M-1 M-2 Business Park, subject to Special Provisions 18.48 C C C

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 11 -

Truck and Trailer Storage or Parking, subject to Special Provisions Chapter 18.48 N C N C
Warehouse, General, subject to Special Provisions Chapter 18.48 P C P C P C
Warehousing Logistics and Distribution, subject to Special Provisions Chapter 18.48 N N C

SECTION 6. Sections 18.24.130 and 170 of Chapter 18.24 I-P (Industrial Park) of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code, pertai ning to Special Provision requirements is hereby amended to read as follows with added and modified text is shown in boldface underline ( text) and deleted text is shown in strikethrough ( text) with existing text to remain unchanged shown without boldface underline nor strikethrough:

18.24.130 - Landscaping.

In all commercial and industrial Developments:

A. Landscaping Shall be provided for the Development of any Lot with a minimum Landscaping coverage of fifteen percent of the Lot Area. The Landscaping Shall p rovide a mixture of shrubs, trees, groundcover, flowers and lawns throughout the entire Front Yard area, Side Yard areas, Parkways and throughout Open Spaces not occupied by access ways, parking areas and Sidewalks. One tree per three customer/employee and truck/trailer Parking Spaces Shall be provided and planted throughout the landscaped areas. Twenty-five percent of the trees Shall be of twenty -four inch box size, another twenty-five percent of thirty -six inch box size, and the remainder May be a minimum of fifteen-gallon size. Landscape and irrigation plans Shall be prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer, and submitted to the Community Development Director along with the general Building plans for review and Approval.

B. The required Landsca ping Shall be maintained in a neat, clean, safe, orderly and healthful condition.

C. The landscaped areas Shall be provided with a suitable permanent method for watering or sprinkling of plants. Wherever possible, the watering system Shall utilize the least amount of water. Sprinklers Used to satisfy the requirements of this provision Shall be so spaced as to assure complete coverage of the landscaped areas.

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 12 -

D. Areas proposed for Development in another phase Shall be temporarily turfed, seeded and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control, if the phase will not begin construction within six Months of completion of the previous phase.

18.24.170 Special Provisions. Specified Uses within Chapter 18.48 (Special Provisions), section 18.48.134 of this code.

SECTION 7. Sections 18.26.130 and 170 of Chapter 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial) of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code, pertaining to Special Provision requirements is hereby amended to read as follows with added and modified text is shown in boldface underline (text) and deleted text is shown in strikethrough ( text) with existing text to remain unchanged shown without boldface underline nor strikethrough:

18.26.130 - Landscaping.

Landscaping Shall be provided for the Development of any Lot with a minimum Landsc aping coverage of fifteen percent of the Lot Area. The Landscaping Shall provide a mixture of shrubs, trees, groundcover, flowers and lawns throughout the entire Front Yard area, Side Yard areas, Parkways and throughout Open Spaces not occupied by access ways, parking areas and Sidewalks. One tree per three customer/employee and truck/trailer Parking Spaces Shall be provided and planted throughout the landscaped areas. Twenty -five percent of the trees Shall be of twenty -four inch box size, another twenty -five percent of thirty -six inch box size, and the remainder May be a minimum of fifteen -gallon size. Landscape and irrigation plans Shall be prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer, and submitted to the Community Development Director along wit h the general Building plans for review and Approval.

18.26.170 Special Provisions. Specified Uses within Chapter 18.48 (Special Provisions) of this code.

SECTION 8. Sections 18.28.130 and 170 of Chapter 18.28 (M -2 Heavy Industrial) of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code, pertaining to Special Provision requirements is hereby amended to read as follows with modified text is shown in boldface underline ( text) and deleted

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 13 -

text is shown in strikethrough ( text) with existing text to remain unchanged show n without boldface underline nor strikethrough:

18.28.130 - Landscaping.

Landscaping Shall be provided for the Development of any Lot with a minimum Landscaping coverage of fifteen percent of the Lot Area. The Landscaping Shall provide a mixture of shrubs , trees, groundcover, flowers and lawns throughout the entire Front Yard area, Side Yard areas, Parkways and throughout Open Spaces not occupied by access ways, parking areas and Sidewalks. One tree per three customer/employee and truck/trailer Parking Spa ces Shall be provided and planted throughout the landscaped areas. Twenty -five percent of the trees Shall be of twenty -four-inch box size, another twenty -five percent of thirty -six-inch box size, and the remainder May be a minimum of fifteen -gallon size. L andscape and irrigation plans Shall be prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer, and submitted to the Community Development Director along with the general Building plans for review and Approval.

18.28.170 Special Provisions. Specified Uses within Chapter 18.48 (Special Provisions) of this code.

SECTION 9. Section 18.48.134 Truck and Trailer Storage or Parking of Chapter 18.48 (Special Provisions) of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code, pertaining to , is hereby added to Warehouse Logistics and Distribution and Truck and Trailer Storage; Parking; Business Park; and General Warehouses read as follows with new text is shown in boldface underline ( text) and deleted text is shown in strikethrough (text), and updated text in bold underline with existing text to remain unchanged shown without boldface underline nor strikethrough:

18.48.134_Warehouse, Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking and Business Park

Purpose: In response to community concerns on the environmental, operational, aesthetic, proximity to residential zones and noise concerns, this special provision includes new standards for the following specified industrial uses listed herein.  Business Park
 Truck and Trailer Storage and Parking

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 14 -

 Warehouses, General
 Warehouse Logistics and Distribution
Section 18.06.060 —Uses Permitted of this Code requires a Conditional Use Permit or prohibits the uses in specified zones . T he following special standards shall apply when conditionally permitted in addition to development standards listed in each zone and/or other local, state or federal codes applicable to such uses :

A. Proximity to Residential Zone.

1. Within 800 feet of a Reside ntial zone, limit operations, including loading, unloading, staging and storage of trucks and trailers to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Saturdays, and shall be prohibited o n Sundays and state and federal holidays unless a noise study prepared by a qualified professional can demonstrate that noise related to operations during these house will not exceed the City’s adopted noise standards within adjacent Residential zone.

B. Building Placement.

1. Any warehouse greater than 107,811 108,900 square feet in size, the building loading dock shall be located a minimum of three-hundred ( 300) feet away measured from the property line of the sensitive receptor to the nearest dock door which does not exclusively serve electric trucks . using a (setback measurements shall use a straight line method).

2. Each project located within 1,000 feet of a Sensitive Receptor or Residential Zone shall provide design analysis to minimize impacts on Sensitive Receptors and residential uses of entrance and exit points to the site.

C. Architectural Design:

1. All buildings and structures shall incorporate enhanced architectural treatments on all sides visible from public view. Enhanced architectural treatments incl ude combinations of accent building materials, windows/spandrel glass, reveals, metal eyebrow accents, cornices, etc.

2. “Cool pavement” materials shall be utilized to reduce heat island effects.

3. Site plan drawings shall identify the type of climate control and air filtration systems in warehouse facilities to promote worker well-being.

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 15 -

4. Signage for directional guidance for vehicles entering and existing the facility shall be provided on -site, including directional guidance to the nearest truck route.

5. Each project shall provide on -site signage for directional guidance to trucks entering and exiting the facility to minimize potential impacts on Sensitive Receptors.

D. Screening Standards:

1. Industrial uses shall be screened from Sensitive Receptors , public right -of- way, and residential zones using appropriate wall design, incorporating landscaping and/or increased wall heights.

2. Loading areas, docks, truck wells and internal circulation routes shall be oriented away (or fully screened) from residential neighborho ods, schools, parks, day care centers, nursing homes, hospitals or other public places and from public rights -of-way to the extent feasible to the satisfaction of the Approving Authority.

3. All items stored outside, including trucks and trailers within parki ng areas and courts, shall be completely screened from public view, by a combination of buildings and/or solid screen walls of either decorative concrete masonry block or decorative concrete tilt -up walls. Screen walls shall not be located within any requ ired front yard or street side building or landscape setback area.

4. All items stored outside, including trucks and trailers within parking areas, shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height unless a taller wall (with approval of Variance) is provided to effectively screen along street frontages.

5. A combination of eight (8) foot tall metal or masonry fencing and a five (5) foot wide landscape planter may be provided in lieu of solid fencing along the side of the side and rear property lines in areas where the s ite is not visible to the public. A combination of trees and shrubs shall be provided to ensure adequate screening.

6. Anti-graffiti coating or equivalent measure to prevent graffiti shall be provided for all solid screen walls facing a public right-of-way.

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 16 -

E. Stormwater: Underground stormwater chambers shall be provided to avoid the need for aboveground basins. Alternatively, aboveground basins may be permitted if the depth of the basin does not require fencing and can be planted with shrubs and groundcover so a s to appear as part of the landscaped area of the site.

F. Parking Requirements:

1. All passenger vehicle parking lots, drive aisles or truck courts, and outdoor storage areas shall be paved with “cool pavement” materials ; no areas shall remain unfinished and a ll areas of a developed site shall be finished with a permanent surface or permanent landscaping materials and irrigation.

2. Sufficient space, including additional overflow areas, shall be provided to accommodate all maneuvering, queuing, stacking, loading, unloading, and parking of vehicles on -site to avoid queuing, stacking, loading, unloading, and parking of vehicles off-site on adjacent streets.

3. The facility site plan shall base truck vehicle space specifications, loading, parking and stacking specificat ions, and maneuvering standards on the Surface Transportation Act (STAA) and California Standard design vehicle.

G. Landscape Standards:

1. All outdoor storage uses (including truck storage) shall incorporate a minimum of fifteen (15) foot deep landscaped setbac ks along all public street frontages with a combination of trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Parking of motor vehicles is not permitted within the required setback area.

2. All outdoor storage uses shall provide a minimum ten (10) foot wide landscape planter at the base of any buildings and screening walls that are visible from and face street frontages. Planting within these planters any setback, planter or landscape buffer areas shall consist of a combination of small to medium scale trees 15-inch, 24-inch and 36-inch box trees , shrubs, and groundcover vegetation to soften the edge of the building or screen wall, and shall be consistent with subsections 18.24.130, 18.26.130, and 12.28.130 – Landscaping.

3. Trees shall be planted every thirty twenty (320) linear fe et within all landscaped planters on-site. Two (2) rows of trees shall be provided within all

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 17 -

landscape setbacks adjacent to public streets. A minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the trees on -site shall consist of evergreen broadleaf tree species to ensure year-round coverage.

4. A preliminary landscape plan shall be required when submitting a Planning application, showing general location of the trees, shrubs, and ground cover.

The landscaping areas should be lushly landscaped with adequate number and placement of landscaping including but not limited to trees, shrubs, bushes, groundcover, and rocks/boulders. The proposed landscape plan should ensure a unified and cohesive design theme while considering appropriateness to climatic conditions, soil conditions, and concern for maintenance and water conservation.

H. Noise.

1. A Transportation Demand Management measures for industrial uses with over one hundred employees to reduce work -related vehicle trips shall be provided, prior to occupancy.

2. Compliance with Title 18 – The City Noise Standards shall be met. The project shall not cause noise levels to exceed City Noise Standards within residential zones or other sensitive land uses for projects within 800 or 1,000 feet of a residential zone.

I. Security Standards.

1. All outdoor storage shall be secured and incorporate security cameras that are connected to the City’s enforcement system to the satisfaction of the Police Chief.

J. Operational Standards

1. Warehousing and distribution facilities generating more than 50 truck t rips per day, as determined by the most recent Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Rate for the specific land use, shall prepare an Operations and Truck Route Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer as part of the Conditional Use Permit application.

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 18 -

i. The plan shall describe the operational characteristics of the proposed use, including but not limited to, hours of operation, projected number of employees, types of items permitted to be stored (outdoors) at the site, and the proposed truck routing to and from the facility to the designated truck routes that avoids passing residential, educational, park and recreational use areas to the greatest extent feasible. ii. The plan shall also include physical and operational measures for preventing truck queuing, stopping, and parking on public streets.

2. The operator of the warehouse, storage and/or trucking use shall be responsible for implementing and monitoring the Operations and Truck Route Plan during all operations, incl uding but not limited to posting the plan and educating truck drivers on the approved routes.

3. Drivers shall not sleep or reside within any vehicle on -site overnight or for any extended duration of time.

4. Idling of trucks queued or operated onsite shall not exceed 5 minutes.

5. All on-site equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, shall be electric with necessary electric charging stations provided.

6. All facility or tenant -owned and operated fleet equipment with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 14 ,000 pounds accessing the site shall meet or exceed 2010 model -year emissions equivalent engine standards are currently defined in the California Code of Regulations Title 13, Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 4.5, Section 2025.

7. Operators shall address any parking, traffic, noise or safety issues within forty-eight hours of being notified by the city that an issue exists.

8. Prior to the issuance of a Business Occupancy Permit or Business License for any new tenant or operator of a warehouse or truck, trailer storage facility, a new or revised Operations and Truck Route Plan prepared by a licensed traffic engineer associated with the new tenant shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer , demonstrating that the proposed operations and projec t traffic associated with the new tenant or operator is the same or less than the project traffic and operations assume

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 19 -

in the approved entitlements for the facility.

9. Where transport by temperature-controlled trucks or trailers is proposed, on-site electrical hookups shall be provided at loading docks. Idling or use of auxiliary truck engine power to power climate -control equipment shall be prohibited.

K. Air Quality

1. Warehouses and distribution facilities generating 150 or more truck trips per day, as determi ned by the most recent Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Rate for the specific land use or within 1000 feet of a sensitive receptor, shall prepare a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management Distr ict (SCAQMD) Guideline for the new development or substantial enlargement of industrial uses.

2. Each project shall provide specific design criteria to m inimize exposure to diesel emissions for residential neighborhoods, schools, parks, playgrounds, day care centers, nursing homes, hospitals, and other public places (Sensitive Receptors) situated in close proximity to the industrial uses.

3. Each project shall provide and be i n compliance with CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act), and prepare an SCAQMD URBEMIS (South Coast Air Quality Management District) and EMFAC (Emission Factor) computer models to identify the significance of air quality impacts on Sensitive Receptors.

SECTION 10. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject t o the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and Sections 15060(b)(3). The activity is not subject to CEQA because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The proposed amendments propose regulatory and administrative amendments

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 20 -

to the zoning code. Additional environmental review will be conducted on projects that are affected by these changes.

SECTION 1 1. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Ordinance is based are located at the City Clerk’s office located at 650 N. La Cadena Drive, Colton, California 92324. The custodian of these records is the City Clerk.

SECTION 12. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any entity, person or circumstance is held for any reason to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the prov isions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council of the City of Colton hereby declare that they would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 1 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following its adoption. The effective date of this Ordinance shall automatically repeal Ordina nce No. O-05-21.

SECTION 14. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.

Not later than fifteen (15) days following the passage of this Ordinance, the Ordinance, or a summary thereof, along with the names of the City Cou ncil members voting for and against the Ordinance, shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Colton.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this_____ day of _______, 2022.

City of Colton

______________________________
Frank J. Navarro, Mayor

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 21 -

ATTEST:

______________________________________
Carolina R. Padilla, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Attachment 2_Ordinance No. O-01-23_final draft (3663 : Warehouse and Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking Zoning Text

ITEM NO. 2

STAFF REPORT

DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: TIME AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER A PUBLIC HEARING TO

APPROVE AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE LIST

OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)

PROJECTS FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE COUNTY OF SAN

BERNARDINO, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT, RESOLUTION NO. R-10-23.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

1) Accept all public testimony at the duly -noticed Public Hearing concerning the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding proposals.

2) Adopt the attached Resolution R -10-23 approving the final prioritized list of recommended CDBG projects for Fiscal Year 2023-2024.

3) Authorize the City Manager to execute all applicable documents related to this action.

BACKGROUND

Since the Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) program’s inception in 1974, it has provided financial assistance to grantees for a variety of community development purposes. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) uses a formula to calculate the grant amount for each metropolitan city, urban county and state. CDBG funds can be used to benefit low and moderate income residents by: building roads, parks, repairing or rehabilitating housing in target areas, by providing new or increased public services to income -qualifying residents, or by funding initiatives that generate new jobs. The Co unty of San Bernardino’s

1.2 Packet Pg. 42
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Public Hearing - CDBG Projects
February 7, 2023

Community Development and Housing Department (“CDH”) currently provides project oversight for CDBG projects through the Urban County program, in which Colton is a partner and joint recipient.

Staff met with the CDBG Ad-hoc Committee on November 29, 2022 to review projects proposed by staff for submittal to CDH by the December 7, 2022 deadline. The CDBG Ad -hoc Committee consisted of Mayor Navarro, Councilmembers Cisneros and Gonzalez, and Planning Commissioners Baden and Payne. Th e Committee approved the list of projects, and an application was submitted for each project to CDH prior to the deadline.

CDH completed its review of Colton applications, and on January 6, 2023, provided a list of eligible project applications. All projects submitted by Colton were deemed eligible for funding.

CDH has requested that Colton submit its list of funding recommendations by February 24, 2023. This list is to be submitted on the Cooperating City Recommended Projects Form, and must be formal ly approved by the City Council. The completed Cooperating City Recommended Projects Form is included as an attachment to Resolution R-10-23.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

The list of eligible project applications provided by CDH includes all projects submitted by th e City. This is the same list that was approved by the CDBG Ad-hoc Committee on November 29, 2022. As such, staff is recommending that City Council formally approve this list of projects for formal submission back to CDH prior to the February 24, 2023 de adline. An approved Cooperating City Recommended Projects Form, along with City Council meeting minutes from the applicable City Council meeting, showing this approval, is the required documentation to be submitted to CDH.

There was one additional fundin g application submitted to the County for consideration. The application is from an organization called “Inspire Together,” with an address listed in San Pedro, California. The application requests all of Colton’s allocation for Public Service projects, to establish a youth center in Colton. A copy of this application is attached for reference. Staff does not recommend that Colton funding be allocated to this program, as to do so would take funding away from existing Public Service programs, which are e stablished, have performed well using CDBG funding in the past, and rely on this funding to operate. By removing any funding from these programs, it is unlikely that they could continue without the identification of another funding source.

FISCAL IMPACTS

The City’s anticipated allocation of CDBG funds for Fiscal Year 202 3-2024 is $404,202, with $60,630 eligible for Public Service projects. CDBG funded projects completed by the City are 100% reimbursable, up to the approved project limit. Funded capital improvement projects will

1.2 Packet Pg. 43
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Public Hearing - CDBG Projects
February 7, 2023

be included in the 2023 -2024 Capital Improvement Program, and will be included in the City’s budget. Funded Public Service projects will be included in the City’s budget by the Community Services Department.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT

1. Public Hearing Notice

2. Resolution - CDBG Prioritization

3. Exhibit A - Cooperating City Recommended Projects Form

4. Application- Inspire Together- Attachment

1.2 Packet Pg. 44

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Colton will hold a Public Hearing , in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 650 North La Cadena Drive, at 6:00 P.M., on TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2023.

The Public Hearing concerns the following actions:

TIME AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER A PUBLIC HEARING TO

ACCEPT ALL PUBLIC TESTIMONY AT THE DULY NOTICED

PUBLIC HEARING , CONCERNING THE COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING (CDBG) PROPOSALS,

DETERMINE THE FINAL PRIORITIZE D LIST OF CD BG PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 202 3-24, AND APPROVE AND ADOPT A

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PRIORITIZED L IST OF
CDBG PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24.

Any interested person may appear in person or by agent and be heard.

If a citizen wishes to challenge the nature of the above action(s) in court, they may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the Pu blic Hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered with the City Clerk’s Office, located at 650 North La Cadena Drive, prior to the hearing, Monday through Thursday.

________________________________
CAROLINA R. PADILLA
City Clerk
City of Colton

1.2.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Public Hearing Notice (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

[1]

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10

11 12

13 14

15 16

17 18

19 20

21 22

23 24

25 26

27 28

RESOLUTION NO. R-10-23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA ,

PRIORITIZING PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Colton elected to enter into a Cooperation Agreement with the County of San Bernardino in order to receive Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) funds; and

WHEREAS, as a “Cooperating City, ” the City of Colton anticipates receiving $404,202 in CDBG funds for Fiscal Year 2023-2024; and

WHEREAS, the City Council, as the governing body of the City of Colton, is required by statute to take a formal action approving a prioritized list of projects to be recommended to the County for funding with CDBG funds for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 as part of their Urban County Consolidated Plan to comply with CDBG program regulations and subject to available funding; and

WHEREAS, the City Council seated a committee, known as the CD BG Ad Hoc Committee, comprised of three (3) City Cou ncil members and three (3 ) Planning Commissioners, to review the eligible projects and make funding reco mmendations to the Council; and

WHEREAS, the CDBG Ad Hoc Committee met on November 29, 202 2 and determined their recommendations for prioritization of the available CDBG allocation; and,

WHEREAS, the City of Colton is required to inform the County of San Bernardino , through completion of the Cooperating City Recommended Projects Form, regarding the priority of eligible projects to be funded with CDBG funds for Fiscal Year 2023-2024.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND FIND AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Colton hereby prioritizes the projects for funding with CDBG funds in Fiscal Year 202 3-2024, as listed on the Cooperating City Recommended Projects Form, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by reference.

1.2.b
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Resolution - CDBG Prioritization (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

[2]

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10

11 12

13 14

15 16

17 18

19 20

21 22

23 24

25 26

27 28

SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Colton has determined that the prioritization recommendation in this Resolution is not a “project” requiring environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code, sections 21000, et seq.); rather, this prioritization relates to a government funding mechanism that does not involve any commitment to any specific project and, as a result, is excluded from the definition of “project” in section 15378(b)(4) of the State CEQA Guide lines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations sections 15000, et seq.). The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file all appropriate notices pursuant to CEQA with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, California.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2023.

________________________________
Frank N. Navarro, Mayor

ATTEST:

CAROLINA R. PADILLA, City Clerk

ATTACHMENT – EXHIBIT A
Cooperating City Recommended Projects Form
(next page)

1.2.b
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Resolution - CDBG Prioritization (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects) City (1): City Council Hearing Date (2): 7-Feb-23
$ 404,202 Public Service Limit (15%) (4): $ 60,630 $0.00 Public Service
YIN
(8)
Applicant's
Requested Amount (9)
City's 2023-2024
Recommended
Allocation Amount
(10)
Available
Unprogrammed
Funds to Commit
to Activity
(11)
Public Service
Amount
(12)
Activity
Total
(13)
Y 25000 25000 0 25000 25000
Y 15000 15630 0 15630 15630
Y 20000 20000 0 20000 20000
N 343326 343572 0 0 343572
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Totals (14)
403,326$ 404,202.00$ $ - $ 60,630.00 404,202.00$ Public Service Calculation (15):
60,630$
Less Total Public
Service Activity Amount: $ 60,630.00 $ 0 -$
Signature Date (18)
The City agrees to enter into a "General Fund Guarantee" in order for the County to recommend activity funding.

Remaining Balance of Unprogrammed Funds (16):

Public Service Limit:

Authorized City Representative (17):

General Fund Guarantee Certification (19)
For Third-Party capital improvement activities, the City understands that reimbursements received from the County for which no measurable outcome is achieved may subsequently be required to be repaid by the City (using non-federal funds) to County. Measurable outcomes are defined as providing benefits to low- to moderate-income individuals, families, organizations, and communities and are derived from the project or program.

Amount Available to Program to Public
Service Activities:

Project Title
{* indicates project required a "General Fund Guarantee") (7)
Homeless Services
Afterschool Programs at Thompson Teen Center
Literacy Services
Colton - Target Area Alley Rehabilitiation
COLT 23PS-034
COLT 23PS-033
COLT 23CN-007

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Community Development and Housing Department
2023-2024 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Cooperating City Recommended Projects Form
CDH Application Log #
(6)
COLT 23PS-026
City's 2023-2024 Allocation (3):

Available Unprogrammed Funds From
Prior Years (5):

City of Colton
YES

1.2.c
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Exhibit A - Cooperating City Recommended Projects Form (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

1.2.d
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Application- Inspire Together- Attachment (3874 : Public Hearing - CDBG Projects)

ITEM NO. 3

STAFF REPORT

DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: BRIAN DICKINSON, PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITY SERVICES

DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TIME AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER A PUBLIC HEARING TO INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. O-2-23, AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON,
CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE 2022 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND
TRAFFIC (SPEED) SURVEY, ORDINANCE NO. O-2-23.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

The City Council approve the first rea ding of the attached Ordinance O -2-23, adopting speed limits upon the streets of Colton.

BACKGROUND

The California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that all speed limits in exce ss of 25 miles per hour be established based on an engineering and traffic survey, conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA - MUTCD) if they are to be enforceable by the use of radar. These special speed zone surveys are required to be updated every seven (7) years to continue the use of radar enforcement.

In general, the speed limit of the roadway is set at the nearest five (5) mile per hour interval where eighty -five percent of the v ehicles travel at or below the speed, known as the 85th percentile or critical speed. Based on the engineering survey the speed limit can be adjusted downward depending on the physical characteristics of the road, such as abrupt changes in horizontal and/ or vertical alignment and pavement width, so as to enhance its safety. In order for speeding violations to be enforceable in court the City must have current speed zone

1.3 Packet Pg. 64
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Approve Speed Study
February 7, 2023

certifications on file at the courthouse.

The recommended speed limits contained in the attached resolution reflect the change in traffic patterns that have occurred during the past seven years and the adjustments needed to provide effective radar enforcement.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. In accordance with latest relevant sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the latest version of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA -MUTCD), the E&TS at a minimum must consider the following contributing factors toward the establishment of appropriate posted speed limits:

(1) Analysis of prevailing speeds, as determined by traffi c engineering measurements; (2) Analysis of collision records for the most recent available two -year period; and (3) Other highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

The study recommends the establishment and renewal o f valid posted speed limits for forty four (44) street segments on twenty -six (26) citywide streets within the City of Colton, California, and discusses the findings of a comprehensive Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) conducted by General Technologies and Solutions (GTS), LLC which was used to determine these results. This E&TS study was requested by and prepared for the City of Colton as a record of existing conditions on the selected roadways, and to provide the City with a basis for updating and validating its currently posted speed limits on citywide streets.

The findings of this E&TS reveal that all 44 surveyed street segments are recommended to remain at their currently established speed limits as documented, and would not require any changes to the existing posted regulatory signage or speed limit pavement markings.

Per current regulations, the established speed limits in this study will be valid for seven years and can be further extended to fourteen years if no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land used, roadway width, or traffic volume.

The City’s Traffic Safety Committee reviewed the prepared E&TS at its December 14, 2022 meeting and recommended approval.

A copy of the surveys, along with a copy of the approving Ordinance, will be maintained in the Public Works Department files, with a copy in the Police Department and a copy delivered to the San Bernardino County Traffic Court.

1.3 Packet Pg. 65
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Approve Speed Study
February 7, 2023

FISCAL IMPACTS

Adoption of the Ordinance will maintain the existing signed speed limit on all of the listed streets. Deteriorated, faded, or otherwise damaged e xisting speed limit signs will be replaced on an ongoing basis to continue to increase motorist's awarene ss of the speed limit and to continue to give the Police Department the rights of speed radar enforcement. The cost of any replacement speed signs will be funded from the streets maintenance budget.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT

1. EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized

2. EXHIBIT B - Ordinance - Speed Study 2022

1.3 Packet Pg. 66
Engineering and Traffic Surve y
Final Report
Prepared for: City of Colton
December 2022
GTS.210203
GTS
11900 W
Olympic Blvd, Suite
450
Los Angeles, CA 90064
T. 213 267 2332
www.gentecsol.com
Prepared by:
cff>GTS

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

i
Table of Contents

Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 2 Background ............................................................................................................. 4 Regulatory Requirements ....................................................................................... 6 California Vehicle Code (CVC) ................................................................................................ 6 City Municipal Code ............................................................................................................... 8 Methodology ............................................................................................................ 9 Data Collection ...................................................................................................................... 9 Speed Survey .................................................................................................................... 9 Roadway Characteristics ................................................................................................ 10 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) ............................................................................................ 10 Collision Rates ...................................................................................................................... 10 Analysis ................................................................................................................. 14 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 14 Results and Recommendations ........................................................................................... 18

Appendices
Appendix A: Speed Survey Summary Sheets
Appendix B: Speed Survey Data
Appendix C: Radar Certifications
Appendix D: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes

List of Figures

Figure 1. Street Segments and Recommended Speed Limits ................................................... 3

List of Tables

Table 1: Study Street Segments ................................................................................................ 5 Table 2. City of Colton Section 15.a Prima Facie Speed Limits ................................................. 8 Table 3. 2019 Expected Collision Rates .................................................................................. 11 Table 4: Collision Data per Segments ..................................................................................... 12 Table 5: Speed Zoning Analysis ............................................................................................... 15

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

2 Executive Summary
Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices.

This Engineering and Traffic Survey report was requested by and prepared for the City of Colton to provide the city with a basis for updating and validating the currently posted speed limits on citywide streets.

This study recommends the establishment and renewal of valid posted speed limits for forty- four (44) street segments on twenty-six (26) citywide streets within the City of Colton.

The report was prepared in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) including the most recent revisions effective January 1, 2022 and the latest revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) at the time of this study.

In establishing the appropriate posted speed limits, the analysis presented in the following pages takes into consideration the analysis of prevailing speeds, the collision history, and other traffic and road factors not readily apparent to the driver. Such factors include sight distance, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, pedestrian and bicyclist activity and safety, the 10-MPH pace range of prevailing traffic, roadside development and environment, parking practices, the density of adjacent residential and/or business uses, among others.

The draft findings of this Engineering and Traffic Survey reveal that all 44 surveyed street segments are recommended to remain at their currently established speed limits as documented and would not require any changes to the existing posted regulatory signage or speed limit pavement markings. This is driven, among other reasons, by the high number of speed related collisions on City streets, which implies that maintaining the existing speed zones is the most prudent decision despite an increase in the 85 th percentile speed on some segments. One segment in particular Hunts Lane from W Redlands Blvd to Washington Street in shared jurisdiction with City of San Bernardino requires coordination between the two cities to ensure consistency between both directions.

Figure 1 illustrates the street segments with recommended speed limits.

The following pages provide the supporting documentation of the survey’s methodology and findings. Following a brief background, the report is organized under three main headings that summarize the regulatory requirements, present the data collection and collision rates, and describe the analysis, results and recommendations. Appendix A summarizes the existing conditions, collision rates, recommended speed zones for each of the study segments.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) FIGURE 1: CITY OF COLTON RECOMMENDED SPEED ZONES
NO. SEGMENT LIMIT 1
1 AGUA MANSARD S. RIVERSIDE AVE
2 BARTON RD WASHINGTON ST
3 BARTON RD S. LA CADENA DR
4 "C" STREET N. RANCHO AVE
5 COLTON AVE N. CITY LIMITS
6 CENTER ST S. RIVERSIDE AVE/MAIN ST
7 COOLEY DR E. COOLEY LN
8 COOLEY DR S. MT VERNON AVE
9 EUCALYPTUS AVE W. RANDALL AVE
10 FAIRWAY DR N. MT VERNON AVE
11 HUNTS LN W. REDLANDS BLVD
12 LA CADENA DR N. MT VERNON AVE
13 LA CADENA DR N. 8TH ST
14 LA CADENA DR VALLEY BLVD
15 LA CADENA DR RAILROAD OVERPASS
16 LAUREL ST GRAND AVE
17 LAUREL ST PENNSYLVANIA AVE
18 "M" ST S. LA CADENA DR
19 MERIDIAN AVE W. RANDALL AVE
20 MILL ST N. RANCHO AVE
21 MT VERNON AVE JOHNSTON ST
22 MT VERNON AVE CITRUS ST/GRANT AVE
23 MT VERNON AVE E. VALLEY BLVD
24 MT VERNON AVE COOLEY DR
25 CITRUS ST TERESA AVE
26 OLIVE ST MERIDIAN AVE
27 OLIVE ST N. RANCHO AVE
28 PENNSYLVANIA AVE MILL ST
29 PEPPER AVE W. RANDALL AVE
30 RANCHO AVE N. CITY LIMITS
31 RANCHO AVE MILL ST
32 RANCHO AVE AGUA MANSA RD
33 RANCHO AVE W.VALLEY BLVD
34 RECHE CANYON RD WASHINGTON ST
35 RIVERSIDE AVE AGUA MANSARD
36 RV CENTER DR 600 E WASHINGTON ST
37 SAN BERNARDINO AVE N. PEPPER AVE
38 SAN BERNARDINO AVE N. SYCAMORE AVE
39 VALLEY BLVD W. CITY LIMITS
40 VALLEY BLVD N. PEPPER AVE
41 VALLEY BLVD N. RANCHO AVE
42 WASHINGTON ST WEST END
43 WASHINGTON ST S. MT VERNON AVE
44 WASHINGTON ST RECHE CANYON RD
LIMIT 2 SPEED
LIMIT
S. RANCHO AVE 45 MPH
S. CITY LIMITS 50 MPH
E. CITY LIMITS 45 MPH
COLTON AVE 30 MPH
E. "E" ST 40 MPH
S. CITY LIMITS 40 MPH
WASHINGTON ST 35 MPH
E. COOLEY LN 40 MPH
SAN BERNARDINO AVE 30 MPH
AUTO CENTER RD 35 MPH
WASHINGTON ST 40 MPH
N. 8TH ST 35 MPH
VALLEY BLVD 35 MPH
R~LROAD OVERPASS 45 MPH
S. CITY LIMITS 50 MPH
PENNSYLVANIA AVE 35 MPH
N.MT VERNON AVE 35 MPH
MT VERNON AVE 40 MPH
VALLEY BLVD 40 MPH
R~LROAD OVERPASS 40 MPH
CITRUS ST /GRANT AVE 25 MPH
E. VALLEY BL VD 40 MPH
COOLEY DR 35 MPH
WASHINGTON ST 35 MPH
RANCHO AVE 25 MPH -
RAILROAD 30 MPH
N. LA CADENA DR 25 MPH
W. VALLEY BL VD 35 MPH
W. VALLEY BL VD 45 MPH
MILL ST 40 MPH
VALLEY BLVD 35 MPH
S. LA CADENA DR 45 MPH
AGUA MANSARD 45 MPH
S. CITY LIMITS 45 MPH
PLACENTIA LN 50 MPH
1000 E WASHINGTON ST 25 MPH
MERIDIAN AVE 35 MPH
N. PEPPER AVE 40 MPH
N. PEPPER AVE 45 MPH
N. RANCHO AVE 45 MPH
N. MT VERNON AVE 35 MPH
S. MT VERNON AVE 35 MPH
RECHE CANYON RD 40 MPH
WATERMAN AVE 40 MPH
I
I
L---•
I
L---,
Center St
I ~
)' ~
r
VJ~ )
,
~
((1
Grand
Terrace
San Be;nardino Count
Riverside County
Highgrove
Legend
Recommended Speed Zones
- 25MPH
/i - 45MPH
San (
1 - soMPH
Bernardino :_::J Colton City Boundary
/ I ..._ J County Boundaries
/ Unincorporated Areas
Surrounding Cities
- Bloomington
Grand Terrace
Highgrove
Loma Linda
Rialto
San Bernardino
-W Redlands Blvd
-,
I I
-- Ir
r! L J' ,r -,
j
·---·\.-: \ I
I
I
I
:

I
I
I
I
0 w
a,
J
~ iii .;
:a:
en
Loma Linda

0.5 1 mi

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

4 Background
The purpose of the 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey is to evaluate the speed limit of selected streets within the City of Colton (City), San Bernardino County. This study is required by the State of California to establish speed limits and maintain eligibility of enforcement on City roads in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) and California Vehicle Code (CVC).

The CVC authorizes local government bodies to establish effective and enforceable speed limits on city highways. The CVC Code sets the regulatory framework for Engineering and Traffic Surveys and describes the contributing factors in establishing speed limits being speed data, collision history, and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the road users. Several section of the CVC relevant to this study have been updated effective January 1, 2022. These sections were reviewed, summarized in the following chapter, and their requirements were incorporated as part of this study.

The CA-MUTCD defines standards and guidelines for establishing speed limits based on collecting speed data using radar or other electronic devices that measure the speed of moving objects to determine the change in the existing posted speed limit. This study is developed in compliance with the CA-MUTCD and California Vehicle Code mandates.

The street segments included in this study were determined based on pre-existing zone designations from earlier speed surveys, existing conditions observed in the field, and in consultation with City staff. A total 44 segments on 26 city wide streets were identified within the City’s jurisdiction. The segments are summarized in Table 1.

Per current regulations, the established speed limits in this study will be valid for seven years and can be further extended to fourteen years if no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume.

The following sections of this report are organized under three main headings:
- Regulatory Requirements: summarizing the more relevant elements of the CVC - Methodology: presenting the data collection and collision rates - Analysis: presenting the analysis, results and recommendations

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

5 Table 1: Study Street Segments
STREET SEGMENT LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2

1. AGUA MANSA ROAD S. Riverside Avenue S. Rancho Avenue

2. BARTON ROAD Washington Street South City Boundary Limits

3. BARTON ROAD S. La Cadena Drive E. City limits (UPRR)

4. "C" STREET N. Rancho Avenue Colton Avenue

5. COLTON AVENUE North City limit (Lytle Cajon Channel) E."E" Street

6. CENTER STREET S. Riverside Avenue/Main Street S. City Limits

7. COOLEY DRIVE E. Cooley Lane Washington Street

8. COOLEY DRIVE S. Mount Vernon Avenue E. Cooley Lane

9. EUCALYPTUS AVENUE W. Randall Avenue San Bernardino Avenue

10. FAIRWAY DRIVE N. Mount Vernon Avenue Auto Center Road

11. HUNTS LANE W. Redlands Boulevard Washington Street

12. LA CADENA DRIVE N. Mount Vernon Avenue N. 8th Street

13. LA CADENA DRIVE N. 8th Street Valley Boulevard

14. LA CADENA DRIVE Valley Boulevard BNSF Railroad Overpass

15. LA CADENA DRIVE BNSF Railroad Overpass S. City Limits

16. LAUREL STREET Grand Avenue Pennsylvania Avenue

17. LAUREL STREET Pennsylvania Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue

18. "M" STREET S. La Cadena Drive Mount Vernon Avenue

19. MERIDIAN AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard

20. MILL STREET N. Rancho Avenue BNSF Railroad Overpass

21. MOUNT VERNON AVENUE Johnston Street E. Citrus Street/Grant Avenue

22. MOUNT VERNON AVENUE E. Citrus Street/ Grant Avenue E. Valley Boulevard

23. MOUNT VERNON AVENUE E. Valley Boulevard Cooley Drive

24. MOUNT VERNON AVENUE Cooley Drive Washington Street

25. CITRUS STREET Teresa Avenue Rancho Avenue

26. OLIVE STREET Meridian Avenue Railroad

27. OLIVE STREET N. Rancho Avenue N. La Cadena Drive

28. PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard

29. PEPPER AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard

30. RANCHO AVENUE N. City Limit Mill Street

31. RANCHO AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard

32. RANCHO AVENUE Agua Mansa Road S. La Cadena Drive

33. RANCHO AVENUE W. Valley Boulevard Agua Mansa Road

34. RECHE CANYON ROAD Washington Street S. City Limit

35. RIVERSIDE AVENUE Agua Mansa Road Placentia Lane

36. RV CENTER DRIVE 600 E Washington Street 1000 E Washington Street

37. SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE N. Pepper Avenue Meridian Avenue

38. SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE N. Sycamore Avenue N. Pepper Avenue

39. VALLEY BOULEVARD W. City Limits N. Pepper Avenue

40. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Pepper Avenue N. Rancho Avenue

41. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Rancho Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue

42. WASHINGTON STREET West End S. Mount Vernon Avenue

43. WASHINGTON STREET S. Mount Vernon Avenue Reche Canyon Road

44. WASHINGTON STREET Reche Canyon Road Waterman Avenue

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

6 Regulatory Requirements
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
The California Vehicle Code presents regulations for establishing and enforcing speed zones.

These regulations generally reflect the perspective that speed zoning should be based on traffic conditions and normal driver behavior. This section highlights relevant sections of the CVC considered in establishing speed limits. For a detailed review of applicable codes, the reader is referred to the California Vehicle Code that can be accessed online via https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/.

CVC Section 235, 240, and 515: define respectively the “business district”, the determination of business and residence districts, and residence district.

CVC Section 627 : defines the “Engineering and traffic survey,” and stipulated that it shall include considerations for prevailing speeds, accident records, and highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Local authorities may also consider residential density as well as safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

CVC Section 22348: stipulates that a person shall not drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than the established speed limit.

CVC Section 22349: sets a maximum speed limit for highways at 65 mph and for two-lane undivided highways at 55 mph (unless posted otherwise)
CVC Section 22350: establishes the Basic speed Law which states that a person shall not drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent with due regard for weather, visibility, and traffic. The speed shall not endanger the safety of persons or property.

CVC Section 22352: defines Prima facia (at first impression) speed limits that are considered safe and prudent under normal conditions. This section establishes the 15 mph prima facia speed limits when traversing a railroad grade crossing, traversing intersections with restricted sight distance, and in alleyways. This section also establishes 25 mph prima facie speed limits in a business or residence district (as defined per CVC Sections 235 and 515), when approaching or passing a school building when children are present, or when passing a senior center.

CVC Section 22357 & 22358: authorize local agencies to respectively increase and decrease speed limits in a reasonable and safe manner on local streets to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic. Based on an engineering and traffic survey, a local agency may declare

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

7 a prima facie speed limits of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, or a maximum speed of 65 miles per hour.

CVC Section 22358.6: states that (effective January 1, 2022) in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment.

CVC Section 22358.7: authorizes a local authority to determine and declare (by ordinance) a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour if (1) a portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor; (2) a portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians; however, this section will only be applicable after June 30, 2024 or possibly an earlier date when the Judicial Council have developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations.

CVC Section 22358.8: authorizes (effective January 1, 2022) a local authority to retain (by ordinance) the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit.

CVC Section 22358.9: authorizes (effective January 1, 2022) a local authority to determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when the highways are a maximum of four traffic lanes. This section cannot be used when the speed limit has been lowered per Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8 noted earlier, and the maximum posted prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district shall be respectively 30 mph or 25 mph, if establishing a 25 mph or 20 mph speed limit.

The same section states that for a “business activity district” designation, at least three of the following four conditions shall be met: (1) no less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses; (2) parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway; (3) traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet; (4) marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device.

CVC Section 40802 (Division 17, Chapter 3) : defines a speed trap, which if found to exist, a citation will likely be dismissed. Effective January 1, 2002, a speed trap exists if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation. The period can be increased to 14 years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

8 This section also defines the “school zone”, the “senior zone” and the “local street or road”.

A 25-mph speed limit can be established without conducting a speed survey on a local road if it has a width of less than 40 feet, no more than one lane per direction, and less than half a mile of uninterrupted length.

City Municipal Code
In the City’s municipal code (Section 15.a), the City of Colton determined and declared the prima facie speed limit for four streets segments that are presented in the Table 2.

Table 2. City of Colton Section 15.a Prima Facie Speed Limits Street Name Limit 1 Limit 2 Prima Facia
Speed Limit
I Street 10th Street Mount Vernon Avenue 35 MPH
Mount Vernon Avenue Colton Avenue I Street 35 MPH
N La Cadena Drive Mount Vernon Avenue 8 th Street 35 MPH Colton Avenue 10th Street Fairview Avenue 35 MPH

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

9 Methodology
The current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California-MUTCD) specifies the methodology to be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys. This methodology includes the evaluation of existing speed, collision history and roadway conditions not readily apparent to road users. This methodology is based around a spot speed survey that typically consists of measuring speeds, with a radar or other electronics device, of a free-flowing traffic. The statistical speed parameter, 85 th percentile speed limit is used to establish speed limit.

Per Section 2B-13 of California MUTCD, when a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. However, roadway conditions that are not readily apparent to motorist may result in further reduction of 5 mph in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.

Data Collection
As speed zones are established based on existing speed data, recent collision history, and roadside conditions that might not be readily apparent to road users, GTS carried out a radar speed survey, reviewed field conditions and analyzed the recent collision history for the identified 44 roadway segments on 26 citywide streets within the City of Colton. Data of field conditions obtained includes roadway characteristics, current speed data, average daily traffic (ADT), and collisions.

Speed Survey
Spot radar speed surveys were conducted to determine the prevailing speed of drivers on each of the 44 segment locations during March 2022. The surveys were performed during typical weekdays between 9 A.M. to 2 P.M. with a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles.

Speed survey data for each of the segments is provided in Appendix B and the radar (and radar operator) certifications are provided in Appendix C.

The speed-related statistical parameters were extracted from speed survey data, prime among which are the 85th percentile speed and 10-mph pace. - 85th percentile speed also known as critical speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving, and critically represent one standard deviation above the average speed. According to current regulations, the 85th percentile speed should be the starting point for establishing of the prima facie speed. - 10 mph pace is defined as the range in which the largest number of observations fall.

Normally, sixty to seventy percent of free-flowing vehicles drive within the 10 mile per hour pace speed. It is a general practice that the recommended speed limit should be within 10 mph pace.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

10 Roadway Characteristics
Existing roadway conditions for the 44 study segments were collected based on field observations and desktop analysis. Roadway conditions were collected for each study segments and include but not limited to abutting land uses (residential, business, or commercial), lane configurations, proximity to schools, on-street parking, visibility restrictions (sight distance), pedestrian activity and presence of crosswalks, as well as geometric constraints (narrow streets, horizontal and vertical curves, skewed intersections, steep slopes, etc.)
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
The 24-hour average daily traffic volumes for the 44 segments were collected from machine traffic counters in the field during a typical weekday. These counts are used to calculate the collision rates discussed below. The ADT data for each segment is provided as Appendix D.

Collision Rates
The number of collisions on each segment were obtained using the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), Safe Transportation Research and Education Center, University of California, Berkeley.

Collision data was obtained for a 4-year period between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2020. From the collected collision data, collisions by speeding were separated to determine the percentage of collisions due to unsafe speed.

A collision rate, expressed in terms of collisions per million vehicle miles traveled, is calculated on each segment based on several parameters including average daily traffic, segment length and analysis period in days as shown in the equation below.

Collision Rate =
Total No. of Collisions x 1,000,000
Distance x ADT x No. of Days

Where:
- Total No. of Collisions: Total Number of collisions on the segment during the analysis period (4 years), both directions
- ADT: Average Daily Traffic (vehicles/day), both directions - Distance: Roadway segment distance travelled by each vehicle (miles) - No. of Days: Number of days during the selected analysis period (4 years = 1,460 days) The calculated collision rates were calculated for each segment.

To evaluate collision rates that can be reasonably expected, the study segment collision rates were compared to collision rates on segments of similar characteristics with Caltrans District 8 (San Bernardino and Riverside counties) using the 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways, Caltrans. Table 3 illustrates the 2019 average collision rates per roadway type.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

11 Table 3. 2019 Expected Collision Rates
Roadway Type
(Urban)
Expected Collision Rate
(Collisions per million vehicle miles)
2 Lane And 3 Lane 1.08
4+ Undivided 0.86
4+ Divided 1.33
Source: 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). Issued by: The California Department of Transportation
These statewide average collision rates (expected rates) which vary based on the roadway types are compared with the collision rates on the study segments to evaluate the safety issues. The results of the collision analysis showing calculated collision rate per segment are presented in Table 4.

Table 4 shows that 34 out of 44 segments have collision rates that exceed those of the expected collision rates.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

12 Table 4: Collision Data per Segments
STREET LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
ADT1
(VEH/DAY)
NO. OF
COLLISIONS2

SPEEDING
COLLISIONS3

EXPECTED
(C/MVM)4

CALCULATED
(C/MVM)5

1. AGUA MANSA ROAD S. Riverside Avenue S. Rancho Avenue 2.3 9,002 15 4 1.08 0.50

2. BARTON ROAD Washington Street South City Boundary 0.44 16,352 15 7 1.08 1.43

3. BARTON ROAD S. La Cadena Drive E. City Limits (UPRR) 0.22 9,519 2 0 1.08 0.65

4. "C" STREET N. Rancho Avenue Colton Avenue 1.1 4,923 13 2 1.08 1.64

5. COLTON AVENUE North City limit (Lytle
Cajon Channel) E."E" Street 0.93 7,688 11 0 1.08 1.05

6. CENTER STREET S. Riverside Avenue /
Main Street S. City Limits 0.75 5,124 0 0 1.08 0.00

7. COOLEY DRIVE E. Cooley Lane Washington Street 0.5 9,076 13 3 1.33 1.96

8. COOLEY DRIVE S. Mount Vernon Avenue E. Cooley Lane 1.5 7,163 25 7 1.33 1.59

9. EUCALYPTUS AVENUE W. Randall Avenue San Bernardino Avenue 0.5 3,146 11 1 1.08 4.79

10. FAIRWAY DRIVE N. Mount Vernon Avenue Auto Center Road 0.8 8,307 30 4 1.08 3.09

11. HUNTS LANE W. Redlands Boulevard Washington Street 0.9 9,745 20 3 0.86 1.56

12. LA CADENA DRIVE N. Mount Vernon Avenue N. 8th Street 0.6 3,966 9 1 1.33 2.59

13. LA CADENA DRIVE N. 8th Street Valley Boulevard 0.9 3,274 37 3 1.08 8.60

14. LA CADENA DRIVE Valley Boulevard BNSF Railroad Overpass 0.8 16,483 26 3 0.86 1.35

15. LA CADENA DRIVE BNSF Railroad Overpass S. City Limits 2.2 21,930 28 4 1.33 0.40

16. LAUREL STREET Grand Avenue Pennsylvania Avenue 0.6 3,196 6 0 1.08 2.14

17. LAUREL STREET Pennsylvania Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue 0.76 3,651 11 0 1.08 2.72

18. "M" STREET S. La Cadena Drive Mount Vernon Avenue 0.8 4,039 15 5 1.08 3.18

19. MERIDIAN AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard 1.1 7,921 13 3 1.08 1.02

20. MILL STREET N. Rancho Avenue BNSF Railroad Overpass 0.58 13,127 30 2 1.08 2.70

21. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE Johnston Street E. Citrus Street / Grant
Avenue 0.26 13,178 11 2 0.86 2.20

22. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
E. Citrus Street/ Grant
Avenue E. Valley Boulevard 1.35 11,298 59 9 0.86 2.65

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

13 STREET LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
ADT1
(VEH/DAY)
NO. OF
COLLISIONS2

SPEEDING
COLLISIONS3

EXPECTED
(C/MVM)4

CALCULATED
(C/MVM)5

23. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE E. Valley Boulevard Cooley Drive 1 20,447 19 8 1.08 0.64

24. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE Cooley Drive Washington Street 0.44 9,704 19 6 1.33 3.05

25. CITRUS STREET Teresa Avenue Rancho Avenue 0.46 2,798 8 2 1.08 4.26

26. OLIVE STREET Meridian Avenue Railroad 1.36 3,980 13 1 1.08 1.65

27. OLIVE STREET N. Rancho Avenue N. La Cadena Drive 0.7 3,266 15 0 1.08 4.49

28. PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard 1.7 4,315 15 1 1.08 1.40

29. PEPPER AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard 1 22,928 59 18 1.08 1.76

30. RANCHO AVENUE N. City Limit Mill Street 0.9 8,000 15 0 0.86 1.43

31. RANCHO AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard 1.6 17,529 74 14 0.86 1.81

32. RANCHO AVENUE Agua Mansa Road S. La Cadena Drive 0.4 10,470 14 4 0.86 2.29

33. RANCHO AVENUE W. Valley Boulevard Agua Mansa Road 1.07 17,061 26 9 0.86 0.98

34. RECHE CANYON ROAD Washington Street S. City Limit 2 28,007 41 15 1.08 0.50

35. RIVERSIDE AVENUE Agua Mansa Road Placentia Lane 1.35 23,482 16 5 0.86 0.35

36. RV CENTER DRIVE 600 E Washington Street 1000 E Washington Street 0.6 1,805 8 1 1.08 5.06

37. SAN BERNARDINO
AVENUE N. Pepper Avenue Meridian Avenue 0.25 5,969 37 7 1.08 16.98

38. SAN BERNARDINO
AVENUE N. Sycamore Avenue N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 10,748 43 7 1.08 3.70

39. VALLEY BOULEVARD W. City Limits N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 9,515 25 3 0.86 2.43

40. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Pepper Avenue N. Rancho Avenue 1.02 11,709 30 6 0.86 1.72

41. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Rancho Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue 1.27 10,182 64 13 1.33 3.39

42. WASHINGTON STREET West End S. Mount Vernon Avenue 0.93 4,591 13 2 1.33 2.09

43. WASHINGTON STREET S. Mount Vernon Avenue Reche Canyon Road 1.19 24,251 63 18 0.86 1.50

44. WASHINGTON STREET Reche Canyon Road Waterman Avenue 0.65 25,821 28 9 1.33 1.14 Notes:
(1) ADT: Average Daily Traffic (2) Number of Collisions (3) Number of speed-related collisions (4) Expected Collisions (C) per Million Vehicles Miles (MVM) (5) Calculated Collision Rate

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

14 Analysis
Data Analysis
This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to establish prima facie speed limits for 44 surveyed roadway segments in the City of Colton, based on a thorough evaluation of the collected data and standard speed zoning practice. Prima Facie speed limits serve to advise drivers and law enforcement of what is the reasonable and prudent speed under normal conditions.

The starting criteria used to recommend the speed limit is the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed. Consideration is then given to the conditions that might cause a change in the speed limit such as above-average collision rates, land use characteristics, pedestrian activity, the 10-mph pace, and roadway conditions that might not be readily apparent to road users, among others.

Table 5 summarizes the speed zone analysis for the roadway segments under consideration.

The following section summarizes the results and recommendations.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

15 Table 5: Speed Zoning Analysis

STREET NAME

SEGMENT LIMITS ROAD CHARACTERISTICS SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
NO.

OF
LANES
CLASS
[A]
10-MPH
PACE
(MPH)
% IN 10-
MPH
PACE
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
POSTED
SPEED
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

SPEED (MPH)

1. AGUA MANSA ROAD S. Riverside Avenue S. Rancho Avenue 2.3 2 MA 41-50 87% 49.2 45 45

2. BARTON ROAD Washington Street South City Boundary
Limits

0.44 2 MA 43-52 78% 51.4 50 50

3. BARTON ROAD S. La Cadena Drive E. City limits (UPRR) 0.22 2 MA 39-48 67% 47.9 45 45

4. "C" STREET N. Rancho Avenue Colton Avenue 1.1 2 CO 25-34 75% 33.7 30 30

5. COLTON AVENUE North City limit
(LYTLE Cajon
Channel)
E."E" Street 0.93 2 MA 30-39 92% 38.8 40 40

6. CENTER STREET S. Riverside
Avenue/Main Street
S. City Limits 0.75 2 MA 36-45 74% 42.8 40 40

7. COOLEY DRIVE E. Cooley Lane Washington Street 0.5 4 MA 28-37 77% 38.6 35 35

8. COOLEY DRIVE S. Mount Vernon
Avenue
E. Cooley Lane 1.5 4 MA 34-43 71% 44 40 40

9. EUCALYPTUS
AVENUE
W. Randall Avenue San Bernardino
Avenue

0.5 2 CO 24-33 84% 32.9 30 30

10. FAIRWAY DRIVE N. Mount Vernon
Avenue
Auto Center Road 0.8 2 SA 30-39 68% 40.9 35 35 [B]

11. HUNTS LANE W. Redlands
Boulevard
Washington Street 0.9 4 SA 32-41 51% 44.4 40 40

12. LA CADENA DRIVE N. Mount Vernon
Avenue
N. 8th Street 0.6 4 MA 29-38 89% 37.2 35 35

13. LA CADENA DRIVE N. 8th Street Valley Boulevard 0.9 2 MA 28-37 82% 35.5 35 35

14. LA CADENA DRIVE Valley Boulevard BNSF Railroad
Overpass

0.8 4 MA 37-46 58% 49.8 45 45

15. LA CADENA DRIVE BNSF Railroad
Overpass
S. City Limits 2.2 4 MA 46-55 74% 55.9 50 50 [C]

16. LAUREL STREET Grand Avenue Pennsylvania Avenue 0.6 2 CO 31-40 80% 39.7 35 35

17. LAUREL STREET Pennsylvania Avenue N. Mount Vernon
Avenue

0.76 2 CO 27-36 79% 38.1 35 35

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

16 STREET NAME

SEGMENT LIMITS ROAD CHARACTERISTICS SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
NO.

OF
LANES
CLASS
[A]
10-MPH
PACE
(MPH)
% IN 10-
MPH
PACE
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
POSTED
SPEED
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

SPEED (MPH)

18. "M" STREET S. La Cadena Drive Mount Vernon
Avenue

0.8 2 CO 32-41 72% 43.5 40 40

19. MERIDIAN AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard 1.1 2 CO 34-43 80% 42.9 40 40

20. MILL STREET N. Rancho Avenue BNSF Railroad
Overpass

0.58 2 MA 34-43 65% 42.7 40 40

21. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
Johnston Street E. Citrus Street /
Grant Avenue

0.26 4 MA 20-29 86% 28.3 25 25

22. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
E. Citrus Street/
Grant Avenue
E. Valley Boulevard 1.35 4 MA 32-41 68% 46.1 40 40 [D]

23. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
E. Valley Boulevard Cooley Drive 1 2 MA 29-38 77% 39.3 35 35

24. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
Cooley Drive Washington Street 0.44 4 MA 30-39 69% 39.4 35 35

25. CITRUS STREET Teresa Avenue Rancho Avenue 0.46 2 CO 27-36 77% 35.1 25 25

26. OLIVE STREET Meridian Avenue Railroad 1.36 2 MA 24-33 77% 31.9 30 30

27. OLIVE STREET N. Rancho Avenue N. La Cadena Drive 0.7 2 SA 21-30 74% 31.6 25 25 [E]

28. PENNSYLVANIA
AVENUE
Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard 1.7 2 CO 27-36 77% 37.7 35 35

29. PEPPER AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard 1 3 MA 39-48 50% 49.9 45 45 [F]

30. RANCHO AVENUE N. City Limit Mill Street 0.9 4 MA 34-43 64% 43.5 40 40

31. RANCHO AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard 1.6 4 MA 31-40 66% 43.8 35 35 [G]

32. RANCHO AVENUE Agua Mansa Road S. La Cadena Drive 0.4 4 MA 42-51 83% 51.1 45 45 [H]

33. RANCHO AVENUE W. Valley Boulevard Agua Mansa Road 1.07 4 MA 44-53 70% 50.7 45 45 [I]

34. RECHE CANYON
ROAD
Washington Street S. City Limit 2 2 MA 42-51 80% 50.5 45 45 [J]

35. RIVERSIDE AVENUE Agua Mansa Road Placentia Lane 1.35 4 MA 43-52 69% 54.4 50 50

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

17 STREET NAME

SEGMENT LIMITS ROAD CHARACTERISTICS SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
NO.

OF
LANES
CLASS
[A]
10-MPH
PACE
(MPH)
% IN 10-
MPH
PACE
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
POSTED
SPEED
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

SPEED (MPH)

36. RV CENTER DRIVE 600 E Washington
Street
1000 E Washington
Street

0.6 2 CO 21-30 82% 30.5 25 25 [K]

37. SAN BERNARDINO
AVE
N. Pepper Avenue Meridian Avenue 0.25 2 MA 33-42 87% 39.8 35 35 [L]

38. SAN BERNARDINO
AVENUE
N. Sycamore Avenue N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 2 MA 35-44 86% 43.2 40 40

39. VALLEY BOULEVARD W. City Limits N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 4 MA 39-48 74% 48.5 45 45

40. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Pepper Avenue N. Rancho Avenue 1.02 4 MA 41-50 82% 49.8 45 45

41. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Rancho Avenue N. Mount Vernon
Avenue

1.27 4 MA 26-35 65% 37.5 35 35

42. WASHINGTON
STREET
West End S. Mount Vernon
Avenue

0.93 4 MA 28-37 82% 37.3 35 35

43. WASHINGTON
STREET
S. Mount Vernon
Avenue
Reche Canyon Road 1.19 4 MA 36-45 85% 44.7 40 40

44. WASHINGTON
STREET
Reche Canyon Road Waterman Avenue 0.65 4 MA 33-42 78% 43.5 40 40 Notes:

A. Classification Per City of Colton General Plan Mobility Element: MA= Major Arterial; SA= Secondary Arterial; CO= Collector B. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to higher-than-expected collision rate.

C. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to the presence of an uncontrolled crosswalk, several driveways, and several collisions attributed to speeding.

D. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to the presence of various pedestrian crossings along the corridor and higher-than-expected collision rate.

E. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to higher-than-expected collision rate.

F. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to the presence of various institutions (middle school, hospital, medical center, etc.) and higher-than-expected collision rate.

G. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to the presence of Colton High School, higher-than-expected collision rate, and multiple uncontrolled pedestrian crossings.

H. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to higher-than-expected collision rate, consistency with adjacent segments, and truck traffic/driveways.

I. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to due to the closely spaced signalized intersections, the roadway classification, the horizontal curvature, the truck traffic turning across center two- way left turn median, and the higher-than-expected collision rate with a third of collisions attributed to speeding.

J. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed to ensure consistency with the posted speed of the segment within the County of Riverside and due to that several collisions are attributed to speeding.

K. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due the presence of horizontal curves and an RV park with various RVs accessing the park.

L. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to the presence a of two-way left-turn central lane, a vertical curve and hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

18 Results and Recommendations
The preliminary results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey reveal that the currently posted speed limits will not change and will remain as documented to allow for continued radar enforcement until the renewal of the posted speeds during the next validation of the Engineering and Traffic Survey.

Below are brief summaries presenting the justification for retaining the existing speed limits for various segments as part of this Engineering and Traffic Survey update for the City of Colton, including radar speed survey results, collision rates, review of existing conditions, and comments regarding evidence of any significant roadway and traffic factors not readily apparent to drivers.

Segment 1- Agua Mansa Road from S Riverside Avenue to S Rancho Avenue This section of Agua Mesa Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial, and vacant land. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted in an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.2 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 41-50.

To ensure consistency with adjacent segment speed limits in the City of Rialto and given the presence of warehouses with truck traffic and curves that can potentially impact sight distances, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.

Segment 3- Barton Road from S La Cadena Drive to E City Limit This section of Barton Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial, and vacant land. An uncontrolled crosswalk is located at S Terrace Avenue. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 47.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 39-48.

Due to the presence of uncontrolled crosswalk, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.

Segment 4- C Street from N Rancho Avenue to Colton Avenue This section of C Street is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are mainly residential.

Curbside parking is permitted on both sides of C Street. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 33.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 25-34. It is noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows higher value of 1.64 MVM compared to the expected 1.08 MVM, which when coupled with the residential land uses and the underpass makes the present speed limit more prudent than a higher speed. It is recommended that existing 30 mph speed limit be maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

19 Segment 5- Colton Avenue from N City Limit to E Street This section of road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 30-39. North side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of City of San Bernardino and is currently posted at 40 mph. To maintain consistency throughout Colton Road, it is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit is maintained.

Segment 6- Center Street from S Riverside Avenue to S City Limit This section of road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are mostly industrial or vacant. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 42.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 36-

45. South side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of City of Riverside, are currently posted at 40 mph. In order to maintain consistency, it is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.

Segment 7- Cooley Drive from E Cooley Lane to Washington Street This section of road is a four-lane divided roadway with bike lanes on both sides. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. An Elementary school is located within this segment. An uncontrolled crosswalk is located at E Old Ranch Road. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.6 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 28-37. With the presence of bike lane, an uncontrolled crosswalk and a school, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.

Segment 8- Cooley Drive from S Mt. Vernon Avenue to E Cooley Lane This section of road is a two-lane divided roadway with bike lanes between E Cooley Lane and north of E Via Venita and a four-lane divided roadway with bike lanes and curbside parking for the remining section till S Mt Vernon Avenue. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 34-43. The high collision rate as well as the presence of sharp horizontal curves, curbside parking, truck traffic and bicycle traffic makes the existing 35 mph the prudent speed limit.

Segment 9- Eucalyptus Avenue from W Randall Avenue to San Bernardino Ave This section of road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 32.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 24-33. An Elementary school and a middle school are located within this segment. Due to the presence of schools, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 30 mph speed limit is maintained.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

20 Segment 10- Fairway Drive from N. Mount Vernon Avenue to Auto Center Road This section of Fairway Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential, and vacant land. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 40.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 30-39. The 10-mph pace range of 30 to 39 mph with 68% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85 th percentile speed of 40.9 mph. It is also noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows much higher value of 3.09 MVM compared to the expected 1.08 MVM. It is recommended that existing speed 35 mph speed limit be maintained (CVC 22358.8) due to above reasons.

Segment 11- Hunts Lane from W Redlands Blvd to Washington Street This section of Fairway Drive is a four-lane roadway in shared jurisdiction with the City of San Bernardino. The adjacent land uses are residential, commercial. The existing speed limit on this segment per the City’s 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey is 40 mph. However, the posted speed limit is 45 mph going northbound which to our understanding is in the City of San Bernardino. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of

44.4 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 32-41. It is recommended to maintain consistency between the two agencies. Given the higher-than-expected collision rates (over 10% of which are attributed to speeding), it is recommended speed limit of 40 mph be posted.

Segment 14- La Cadena Drive from Valley Blvd to BNSF Railroad Overpass This section of La Cadena Drive is mostly a four-lane undivided roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. An Elementary school is located within this segment and an uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk at O Street. In addition, several commercial and residential driveways front La Cadena Drive. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 37- 46 mph with 58% of drivers within that pace. Due to the presence of driveways and several cross streets there is a potential for unexpected crossing, stopping, and turning vehicular traffic. With the school, crosswalk, and numerous driveways, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 15- La Cadena Drive from BNSF Railroad Overpass to S. City Limits This section of La Cadena Drive is mostly a four-lane roadway with a two-way left-turn lane. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial, and vacant land. This segment has an uncontrolled crosswalk at Fogg Street. The existing posted speed limit is 50 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 55.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 46 - 55mph. With 14% of the collisions attributed to speeding, and the presence of an uncontrolled crosswalk and several driveways, it is recommended that existing 50 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 16- Laurel Street from Grand Avenue to Pennsylvania Avenue

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

21 This section of road is a two-lane roadway. Curb-side parking is permitted along both sides of this segment. The adjacent land use is residential. A middle school is located within the segment. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 31-40. With a residential street typology, a higher-than-expected collision rate, and presence of a school, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 17- Laurel Street from Pennsylvania Avenue to N Mt Vernon Avenue This section of road is a two-lane roadway. Curb-side parking is permitted along both sides of this segment. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph with a 25 mph speed posted on both sides of the railroad underpass. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 27 - 36 with 79% of vehicles within this pace driving below the 85 th percentile speed. With a higher-than-expected collision rate, the current pace, and the presence of numerous driveways, it is prudent to retain the existing 35 mph speed limit.

Segment 18- M Street from S La Cadena Drive to Mt Vernon Avenue This section of road is a two-lane roadway with curb-side parking permitted along both sides of this segment between La Cadena Drive and Fogg Street. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 32-41 with 72% indicating that a large majority of drivers driving the below 85th percentile speed. Given the above, and the presence of on-street parking, a higher-than-expected collision rate, and residential driveways a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit is maintained.

Segment 19- Meridian Avenue from W Randall Avenue to W Valley Blvd This section of Meridian Avenue is a two-lane roadway with a two-way left-turn lane with an uncontrolled crosswalk located at W Poema Drive intersection. Bike lanes are provided between San Bernardino Avenue and Valley Boulevard. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. An elementary school, a university medical center (California University of Science and Medicine center) and a hospital (Arrowhead Medical Center) is located within this segment.

The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 42.9 mph. It is recommended that speed limit remain 40 mph due to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle uses associated with the noted institutions along the roadway segment.

Segment 20- Mill Street from N Rancho Ave to BNSF Railroad Overpass This section of Mill Street is a two-lane undivided roadway with curbside parking permitted on both sides. The adjacent land uses are primarily residential and commercial with numerous

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

22 driveways. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 42.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 34-43 mph. With the significantly higher-than-expected collision rate and the reduced sight distance on residential and commercial driveways associated with on-street parking, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 21- Mt Vernon Avenue from Johnston St to E Citrus St/Grand Ave This section of road is a four-lane roadway with abutting residential and commercial uses. San Bernardino Valley College is located along this segment. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 28.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 20-29 mph. It is noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows higher value of 2.20 MVM compared to the expected 0.86 MVM. Due to higher collision rate and presence of a college, lower speed limit is prudent. it is recommended that the existing 25 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 22- Mount Vernon Avenue from E. Citrus Street/ Grant Avenue to E. Valley Boulevard This section of road is a four-lane roadway with two-way left-turn lane. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential with various pedestrian crossings along the corridor. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 46.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 32- 41. It is noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows higher value of 2.65 MVM as compared to the expected 0.86 MVM. The 10-mph pace range of 32 to 41 mph with 68% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85th percentile speed of 46.1 mph. Given the above vehicular and pedestrian considerations, it is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 23- Mt Vernon Avenue from E. Valley Boulevard to Cooley Drive This section of road is a two-lane roadway and gradual horizontal and vertical curves. The adjacent land uses are mostly commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 29-38 mph. The 10-mph pace range of 29 to 38 mph with 77% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85 th percentile speed of 39.3 mph. In addition, other considerations include horizontal curves (and associated sight distances), closely spaced signalized intersections, and an undivided narrow roadway over the railroad grade crossing and storm channels. As such a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 24- Mt Vernon Avenue from Cooley Drive to E Washington Street This section of road is a six-lane divided roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and vacant land. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

23 resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.4 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 30-39 mph. With a higher-than-expected collision rate and 32% of collisions attributed to speeding, it is prudent to maintain the existing speed limit.

Segment 25- Citrus Street from Teresa Avenue to Rancho Avenue This section of road is a four-lane roadway with curb-side parking permitted along both sides.

The adjacent land use is mostly residential, and the existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 35.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 27-36. The calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows much higher value of 4.26 MVM compared to the expected one 1.08 MVM with 25% of the collisions being speeding related. Besides, this segment has reduced sight distance concerns at residential driveways attributed on-street parking. As such, it is recommended that the existing 25 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 27- Olive Street from N. Rancho Avenue to N. La Cadena Drive This section of road is a two-lane roadway with abutting residential uses. Ulysses Elementary School is located between N 2 nd street and N Terrace Avenue on Olive Street. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 31.6 mph with a 10-mph pace range of 21-30 with 74% of drivers within that pace (below the 85 th percentile speed). It is also noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows much higher value of 4.49 MVM compared to the expected one 1.08 MVM. The recommended speed limit is 25 mph due to the presence of a school and high collision rates.

Segment 28- Pennsylvania Avenue from Mill Street to Valley Boulevard This section of road is a two-lane undivided roadway with curb-side parking along both sides.

The adjacent land uses are primarily residential and commercial, and the existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 37.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 27-36. With the higher-than-expected collision rate, 77% of vehicles within the 10-mph pace driving below the 85 th percentile speed, and reduced sight distance on residential and commercial driveways caused by on-street parking, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 29- Pepper Avenue from Randall Avenue to W Valley Boulevard This section of Pepper Avenue is a three-lane roadway between Randall Avenue and San Bernardino Avenue and four-lane divided roadway between San Bernardino Avenue and W Valley Boulevard. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. A middle school (Jehue Middle School), a university medical center (California University of Science and Medicine center) and a hospital (Arrowhead Medical Center) are located within this segment. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 39-48. It is recommended that speed limit

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

24 remain 45 mph due to the presence of the above noted institutions and a higher-than-expected collision rate.

Segment 30- Rancho Avenue from N City Limit to Mill Street This section of road is a four-lane roadway with curb-side parking permitted along both sides.

The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential, and the existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 34-43. With higher-than-expected collision rates coupled with reduced sight distance caused by on-street parking around the residential and commercial driveways, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit is maintained.

Segment 31- Rancho Avenue from Mill Street to W. Valley Boulevard This section of road is a four-lane roadway with a posted bike route with abutting commercial and residential land uses. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 31-40. Colton High School is located on the east side and school stadium is located on the west side of Rancho Avenue between W Valley Boulevard and W E Street. Multiple uncontrolled pedestrian crossings exist along the corridor. With the high amount of pedestrian crossings/traffic, the higher-than-expected crash rates, and the presence of a school, it is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 32- Rancho Avenue from Agua Mansa Road to S La Cadena Drive This section of road is a four-lane roadway with adjacent commercial land uses. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 51.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 42-51. This segment has a higher-than-expected collision rate with 29% of the collisions attributed to speeding. It is recommended to maintain the existing 45 mph speed limit due to truck driveways along curve and to ensure consistency with the proposed speed zone on adjacent segment north of Agua Mansa Road.

Segment 33- Rancho Avenue from W Valley Boulevard to Agua Mansa Road This section of road is a four-lane roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. The adjacent land uses are commercial, residential, and vacant land. The traffic and engineering survey resulted in an 85th percentile speed limit of 50.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 44-53.

However, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained due to the closely spaced signalized intersections, the classification as a Pedestrian Street north of N Street, the horizontal curvature, the truck traffic turning across center two way left turn median, and the higher-than-expected collision rate with 35% of collisions attributed to speeding.

Segment 34- Reche Canyon Road from Washington Street to S. City Limit

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

25 This section of road is a two-lane roadway with adjacent residential and vacant land uses. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 50.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 42-51.

South side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of County of Riverside, and is currently posted at 45 mph. With 37% of the collisions attributed to speeding and in order to maintain consistency throughout Reche Canyon Road, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 35- Riverside Avenue from Agua Mansa Road to Placentia Lane This section of road is a four-lane roadway with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The adjacent land uses are commercial and vacant land. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 54.4 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 43-52. South side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of County of Riverside, and currently posted at 50 mph.

Moreover, the collision rates are higher than expected with 31% of crashes attributed to speeding. As such, it is recommended that existing 50 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 36- RV Center Dr from 600 E Washington St to 1000 E Washington St This section of road is a two-lane roadway with curbside parking permitted on both sides. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial, and the existing posted speed limit is 25 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 30.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 21-30. With various RVs accessing the RV park and the horizontal curves, it is recommended that existing 25 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 37- San Bernardino Ave from N Pepper Avenue to Meridian Avenue This section of road has two through lanes and a two-way left-turn central lane. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 33-42. However due to the presence a of two-way left-turn central lane, a vertical curve and hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is recommended. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit is maintained.

Segment 38- San Bernardino Ave from N Sycamore Ave to N. Pepper Avenue This section of road has four through lanes between Sycamore Avenue and Indigo Avenue and two through lanes between Indigo Avenue and Pepper Avenue. A bike lane is provided for westbound direction. The adjacent land uses are residential and vacant land, and the existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.2 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 35-44. With higher-than-expected collision rates as well as the presence of bike travelers and multi-modal route typology, it is recommended that 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 39- Valley Boulevard from W City Limit to Pepper Avenue

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

26 This section of road has four through lanes and a two-way left-turn central lane. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The adjacent land uses are commercial. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 48.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 39-48.

With heavy truck traffic turning across multiple lanes and higher-than-expected collision rates, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 40- Valley Boulevard from Pepper Avenue to Rancho Avenue This section of road consists of four through lanes and a two-way left-turn central lane. It has a posted speed limit of 45 mph and abuts commercial land uses. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 41-

50. With heavy truck traffic (due to the presence of a truck rental facility) and a two-way left- turn central lane there is a potential for unexpected crossing, stopping, and turning vehicular traffic. As a lower speed limit is prudent, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit is maintained.

Segment 43- Washington Street from S Mt Vernon Ave to Reche Canyon Rd This section of road has four through lanes and one two-way left-turn central lane. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 44.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 36-45. With closely spaced signalized intersections, bicycle street designation, and a higher-than-expected collision rate, it is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 44 - Washington Street from Reche Canyon Rd to S Waterman Ave This section of road is four-lane divided roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 33-42. The 10-mph pace range of 33 to 42 mph with 78% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85th percentile speed of 43.5 mph. Due to above as well as closely spaced signalized intersections and the consistency with adjacent posted speed limit zones, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit is maintained.

.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

Appendix A: Speed Survey Summary Sheets

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Agua Mansa Road
1 S. Riverside Avenue - S. Rancho Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

2.3 2 Lane (Urban)
25 - 75 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at Riverside Avenue and Rancho Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
9002
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 87%

1.08 15

3.75 0.50
4 27%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 12:43 P.M.
104
41 - 50

45.7 49.2
45 consistency with adjacent City of Rialto; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Barton Road
2 Washington Street- S. City Limits
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.44 2 Lane (Urban)
32 - 75 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Washington Street
2- Traffic Volumes
16352
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 78%

1.08 15

3.75 1.43
7 47%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 10:06 A.M.
102
43-52

47.2 51.4
50 closest to the 85th percentile speed
50 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Barton Road
3 S. La Cadena Drive - E City Limits
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.22 2 Lane (Urban)
25 - 58 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at S. La Cadena Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
9519
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 67%

1.08 2

0.50 0.65
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 9:02 A.M.
106
39-48

42.4 47.9
45 consistency with adjacent City of Rialto; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
"C" Street
4 N. Rancho Avenue - Colton Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.1 2 Lane (Urban)
40 - 65 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at N. Rancho Avenue and Stop at Colton
Avenue, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th and Pennsylvania
Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
4923
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 75%

1.08 13

3.25 1.64
2 15%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 9:58 A.M.
106
25-34

29.2 33.7
30 consistency with adjacent City of Rialto; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain
previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
30 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

35.5 38.8
40 Consistency with adjacent jurisdiction; retain previous speed limit.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
92%

1.08 11

2.75 1.05
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 10:12 A.M.
103
30-39
2 Lane (Urban)
42 - 50 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at Mount Vernon Avenue and N. Fairview Avenue; 3 Stops at E. "E" Street, E. "C" Street and Coburn Street 2- Traffic Volumes
7688
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Colton Avenue
5 N. City Limit - E. "E" Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.93 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Center Street
6 S. Riverside Avenue- S. City Limits
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.75 2 Lane (Urban)
24 - 44 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Stop at S. Riverside Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
5124
2/24/2022
3-Collision History
4 74%

1.08 0

0.00 0.00
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 1:55 P.M.
101
36-45

38.2 42.8
40 Consistency with adjacent jurisdiction; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Cooley Drive
7 E. Cooley Lane - Washington Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.5 4L/Divided (Urban)
80 - 93 Feet
4 Divided
1 Signal at E. Washington Street and 2 Stops at Ashwood lane and E. Cooley Lane
2- Traffic Volumes
9076
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 77%

1.33 13

3.25 1.96
3 23%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 11:04 A.M.
104
28-37

33.4 38.6
35 presence of bike lane, an uncontrolled crosswalk and a school; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Cooley Drive
8 S. Mount Vernon Avenue - E. Cooley Lane
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.5 4L/Divided (Urban)
94 - 118 Feet
4 Divided
1 Signal at Mount Vernon Avenue and 1 Stop at E.

Cooley Lane
2- Traffic Volumes
7163
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 71%

1.33 25

6.25 1.59
7 28%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 1:15 P.M.
103
34-43

38.3 44
40 high collision rate; bike lanes and truck traffic; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain
previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

29.2 32.9
30 middle and elementary school; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit
per CVC 22358.8.
30 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
84%

1.08 11

2.75 4.79
1 9%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 12:46 P.M.
101
24-33
2 Lane (Urban)
47 Feet
2 Undivided
4 Stops at Randall Avenue, Admiralty Street, De
Carmen Drive and San Bernardino Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
3146
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Eucalyptus Avenue
9 W. Randall Avenue- San Bernardino Avenue
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.5 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

35.8 40.9
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
68%

1.08 30

7.50 3.09
4 13%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 9:10 A.M.
100
30-39
2 Lane (Urban)
30 - 60 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Mount Vernon Avenue; 2 Stops at Sperry Drive and Auto Plaza Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
8307
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Secondary Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Fairway Drive
10 N. Mount Vernon Avenue- Auto Center Road
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.8 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

37.3 44.4
40 high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
51%

0.86 20

5.00 1.56
3 15%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 12:05 P.M.
101
32-41
4L/Undivided (Urban)
62 - 68 Feet
4 Undivided
4 Signals at Redlands Boulevard, Oliver Holmes Road, E.

Cooley Lane and Washington Street.
2- Traffic Volumes
9745
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 Secondary Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Hunts Lane
11 W. Redlands Boulevard - Washington Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.9 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

33.7 37.2
35 Closest to the 85th percentile speed
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
89%

1.33 9

2.25 2.59
1 11%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 11:05 A.M.
101
29-38
4L/Divided (Urban)
75-86 Feet
4 Divided
2 Signals at Mount Vernon Avenue and Bordwell Avenue; 1 Stop at 8th Street
2- Traffic Volumes
3966
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
12 N. Mount Vernon Avenue - N. 8th Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.6 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

31.4 35.5
35 closest to the 85th percentile speed
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
82%

1.08 37

9.25 8.60
3 8%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 11:10 A.M.
103
28-37
2 Lane (Urban)
50 - 62 Feet
2 Undivided
5 Signals at Olive Street, C Street, G Street, H Street and Valley Boulevard; 2 Stops at E Street and F Street
2- Traffic Volumes
3274
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
13 N. 8th Street - Valley Boulevard
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.9 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

44.1 49.8
45 School and uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain
previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
58%

0.86 26

6.50 1.35
3 12%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 10:15 A.M.
108
37-46
4L/Undivided (Urban)
38 - 78 Feet
4 Undivided
3 Signals at Valley Boulevard, N Street and Maple
Street
2- Traffic Volumes
16483
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
14 Valley Boulevard - BNSF Railroad Overpass
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.8 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

49.6 55.9
50 uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
50 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
74%

1.33 28

7.00 0.40
4 14%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 9:43 A.M.
105
46-55
4L/Divided (Urban)
60 - 100 Feet
4 Divided
1 Signal at Barton Road; 1 Stop at Lowa Street
2- Traffic Volumes
21930
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
15 BNSF Railroad Overpass - S. City Limits
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

2.2 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

35.2 39.7
35 middle school; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
80%

1.08 6

1.50 2.14
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 2:16 P.M.
100
31-40
2 Lane (Urban)
40 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Rancho Avenue; 2 Stops at Grand Avenue and
Norman Road
2- Traffic Volumes
3196
3/2/2022
3-Collision History
4 Grand Avenue - Pennsylvania Avenue
Collector
1- Roadway Conditions

0.6 EB/WB
16 City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Laurel Street

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

33.2 38.1
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
79%

1.08 11

2.75 2.72
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 1:15 P.M.
101
27-36
2 Lane (Urban)
40 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at N. La Cadena Drive; 1 Stop at Pennsylvania
Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
3651
3/2/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Laurel Street
17 Pennsylvania Avenue - N. Mount Vernon Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.76 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 111
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

38.5 43.5
40 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
72%

1.08 15

3.75 3.18
5 33%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 9:05 A.M.
100
32-41
2 Lane (Urban)
45 - 65 feet
2 Undivided
Signal at Mount Vernon Avenue and S. La Cadena Drive; 2 Stops at S. La Cadena Drive and 9th Street
2- Traffic Volumes
4039
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
"M" Street
18 S. La Cadena Drive - Mount Vernon Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.8 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

38.8 42.9
40 high collision rate; various isntituions and uncontrolled crosswalk; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections
22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
80%

1.08 13

3.25 1.02
3 23%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 10:05 A.M.
105
34-43
2 Lane (Urban)
48 Feet
2 Undivided
3 Stops at Randall Avenue, Olive Street and Valley
Boulevard
2- Traffic Volumes
7921
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Meridian Avenue
19 Randall Avenue - W. Valley Boulevard
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.1 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

37.2 42.7
40 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
65%

1.08 30

7.50 2.70
2 7%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 1:27 P.M.
107
34-43
2 Lane (Urban)
35 - 56 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at Rancho Avenue and Pennsylvania Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
13127
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Mill Street
20 N. Rancho - BNSF Railroad Overpass
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.58 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

24.9 28.3
25 high collision rate; college; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
25 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
86%

0.86 11

2.75 2.20
2 18%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 2/23/2022 12:12 P.M.
100
20-29
4L/Undivided (Urban)
62 Feet
4 Undivided
2 Signals at Johnston Street and E. Citrus Street
2- Traffic Volumes
13178
3/2/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Mount Vernon Avenue
21 Johnston Street - E. Citrus Street/ Grant Avenue
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.26 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

39.7 46.1
40 high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
68%

0.86 59

14.75 2.65
9 15%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 9:06 A.M.
105
32-41
4L/Undivided (Urban)
63 Feet
4 Undivided
7 Signals at E. Grant Avenue, Olive Street, Ped
Crossing, Colton Avenue, D Street, F Street and Valley
Boulevard
2- Traffic Volumes
11298
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Mount Vernon Avenue
22 E. Citrus Street/ Grant Avenue - E. Valley Blvd
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.35 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

34.5 39.3
35 10-mph pace; horizontal curves; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
77%

1.08 19

4.75 0.64
8 42%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 1:45 P.M.
101
29-38
2 Lane (Urban)
27 - 92 Feet
2 Undivided
4 Signals at Valley Boulevard, ramp, M Sreet and E.

Cooley Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
20447
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Mount Vernon Avenue
23 E. Valley Boulevard - Cooley Drive
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
1 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

34.4 39.4
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
69%

1.33 19

4.75 3.05
6 32%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 9:02 A.M.
104
30-39
4 L/Divided (Urban)
92 - 105 Feet
4 Divided
4 Signals at Cooley Drive, Santo Antonio Drive, Centerpoint Drive and E. Washington Street
2- Traffic Volumes
9704
4/7/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Mount Vernon Avenue
24 E. Cooley Drive - E. Washington Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.44 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

30.6 35.1
25 high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
25 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
77%

1.08 8

2.00 4.26
2 25%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 1:58 P.M.
107
27-36
2 Lane (Urban)
62 - 65 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Stops at N. Macy Avenue and N. Watwood Avenue; 1
Signal at N. Rancho Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
2798
4/7/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Citrus Street
25 N. Teresa Avenue - N. Rancho Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.46 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

27.4 31.9
30 closest to the 85th percentile speed
30 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
77%

1.08 13

3.25 1.65
1 8%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 12:28 P.M.
100
24-33
2 Lane (Urban)
28 - 42 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at N. Rancho Avenue; 1 Stop at Meridian Avenue 2- Traffic Volumes
3980
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Secondary Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Olive Street
26 N. Meridian Avenue- Railroad
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.36 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
27 31.6
25 high collision rate; elementary school; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
25 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
74%

1.08 15

3.75 4.49
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 9:42 A.M.
100
21-30
2 Lane (Urban)
38 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at N. Rancho Avenue and N. La Cadena Drive; 2 Stops at 2nd Street and Pennsylvania Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
3266
3/2/2022
3-Collision History
4 Secondary Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Olive Street
27 N. Rancho Avenue - N. La Cadena Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.7 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

33.2 37.7
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
77%

1.08 15

3.75 1.40
1 7%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 10:37 A.M.
100
27-36
2 Lane (Urban)
43 - 48 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Mill Street; 6 Stops at Johnston Street, Citrus Street, Laurel Street, Olive Street, C Street and W. Valley Boulevard
2- Traffic Volumes
4315
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Pennsylvania Avenue
28 Mill Street - W. Valley Boulevard
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.7 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

41.9 49.9
45 high collision rate; school and hospital; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain
previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
50%

1.08 59

14.75 1.76
18 31%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 1:35 P.M.
115
39-48
3 Lane (Urban)
70 - 100 Feet
3 Undivided
5 Signals at W. Randall Avenue, W. San Bernardino
Avenue, Violet Street, Blue Drive and W. Valley
Boulevard
2- Traffic Volumes
22928
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Pepper Avenue
29 W. Randall Avenue - W. Valley Boulevard
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
1 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

38.4 43.5
40 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
64%

0.86 15

3.75 1.43
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 12:48 P.M.
107
34-43
4L/Undivided (Urban)
55 - 65 Feet
4 Undivided
2 Signals at Mill Street and Rialto Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
8000
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Rancho Avenue
30 N. City Limit - Mill Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.9 1.3.a
Packet Pg. 124
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Rancho Avenue
31 W. Mill Street - W. Valley Boulevard
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.6 4L/Undivided (Urban)
62 Feet
4 Undivided
7 Signals at Mill Street, Johnston Street, Citrus Street, Laurel Street, Olive Street, C Street and Valley
Boulevard
2- Traffic Volumes
17529
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 66%

0.86 74

18.50 1.81
14 19%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 12:20 P.M.
102
31-40
38 43.8
35 multiple uncontrolled pedestrian crossings; school; high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Rancho Avenue
32 Agua Mansa Road - S. La Cadena Drive
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.4 4L/Undivided (Urban)
62 - 64 Feet
4 Undivided
2 Signals at Agua Mansa Road and La Cadena Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
10470
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 83%

0.86 14

3.50 2.29
4 29%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 12:12 P.M.
101
42-51

47.3 51.1
45 high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Rancho Avenue
33 W. Valley Boulevard - Agua Mansa Road
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.07 4L/Undivided (Urban)
50 - 62 Feet
4 Undivided
4 Signals at Valley Boulevard, I-10 WB ramps, I-10 EB
ramps, Agua Mansa Rd.
2- Traffic Volumes
17061
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 70%

0.86 26

6.50 0.98
9 35%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 10:45 A.M.
100
44-53
46 50.7
45 high collision rate; closely-spaced signalized
intersections; pedestrian street north of N Street; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Reche Canyon Road
34 E. Washington Street - S. City Limit
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
2 2 Lane (Urban)
30 - 62 Feet
2 Undivided
4 Signals at Washington Street, Prado Lane, Topanga Ct
and Shane Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
28007
2/24/2022
3-Collision History
4 80%

1.08 41

10.25 0.50
15 37%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 12:15 P.M.
106
42-51
46 50.5
45 consistency with adjacent jurisdiction; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Riverside Avenue
35 Agua Mansa Road - Placentia Lane
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.35 4L/Undivided (Urban)
60-80 Feet
4 Undivided
3 Signals at Agua Mansa Road, C. R. England and Miguel
Bustamanta Pkwy
2- Traffic Volumes
23482
2/24/2022
3-Collision History
4 69%

0.86 16

4.00 0.35
5 31%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 1:25 P.M.
109
43-52

49.6 54.4
50 consistency with adjacent jurisdiction; high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
50 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
RV Center Drive
36 601 E. Washington Street - 1000 E. Washington Street EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.6 2 Lane (Urban)
62 - 65 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Stops at Washington Street (west end) and Santo
Antonio Drive/Washington Street (east end)
2- Traffic Volumes
1805
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 82%

1.08 8

2.00 5.06
1 13%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 10:48 A.M.
78 21-30

26.4 30.5
25 RV traffic; high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
25 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
San Bernardino Avenue
37 N. Pepper Avenue - N. Meridian Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.25 2 Lane (Urban)
40 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Pepper Avenue; 1 Stop at Meridian Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
5969
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 87%

1.08 37

9.25 16.98
7 19%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 10:52 A.M.
102
33-42

36.5 39.8
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
San Bernardino Avenue
38 N. Syncamore Avenue - N. Pepper Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.74 2 Lane (Urban)
60 - 62 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Pepper Avenue; 1 Stop at Indigo Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
10748
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 86%

1.08 43

10.75 3.70
7 16%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 12:03 P.M.
102
35-44

39.6 43.2
40 high collision rate; bike lane; multi-modal street
classification; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC
Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Valley Boulevard
39 W. City Limits - N. Pepper Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.74 4L/Undivided (Urban)
83 - 98 Feet
4 Undivided
2 Signals at Wildrose Avenue and Pepper Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
9515
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 74%

0.86 25

6.25 2.43
3 12%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 9:08 A.M.
105
39-48

43.8 48.5
45 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Valley Boulevard
40 N. Pepper Avenue - N. Rancho Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.02 4L/Undivided (Urban)
64 - 100 Feet
4 Undivided
2 Signals at Pepper Avenue and Rancho Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
11709
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 82%

0.86 30

7.50 1.72
6 20%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 9:35 A.M.
103
41-50

45.6 49.8
45 high collision rate; truck traffic; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit
per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Valley Boulevard
41 N. Rancho Avenue - N. Mount Vernon Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.27 4L/Divided (Urban)
70 - 75 Feet
4 Divided
5 Signals at N. Rancho Avenue, 3rd Street, La Cadena
Drive, 9th Street and Mount Vernon Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
10182
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 65%

1.33 64

16.00 3.39
13 20%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 9:14 A.M.
104
26-35

32.3 37.5
35 rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Washington Street
42 West End - S. Mount Vernon Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.93 4L/Divided (Urban)
52-94 Feet
4 Divided
1 Signal at Mount Vernon Avenue; 1 Stop at RV Center
2- Traffic Volumes
4591
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 82%

1.33 13

3.25 2.09
2 15%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 10:23 A.M.
102
28-37

33.3 37.3
35 Closest to the 85th percentile speed
I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Washington Street
43 S. Mount Vernon Avenue - Reche Canyon Road
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.19 4L/Undivided (Urban)
72 - 113 Feet
4 Undivided
7 Signals at S. Mount Vernon Avenue, Bluff Road, S.

Meadow Lane, S. Cooley Drive, Barton Road, Mohave
Drive and Reche Canyon Road.
2- Traffic Volumes
24251
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 85%

0.86 63

15.75 1.50
18 29%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 10:34 A.M.
106
36-45

40.7 44.7
40 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Washington Street
44 Reche Canyon Road - S. Waterman Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.65 4L/divided (Urban)
106 - 125 Feet
4 Divided
4 Signals at Reche Canyon Road, Hunts Lane, Wier Road,
S. Waterman Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
25821
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 78%

1.33 28

7.00 1.14
9 32%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 9:55 A.M.
105
33-42

39.2 43.5
40 rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

Appendix B: Speed Survey Data

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:43 PM TO 1:15 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED1 AGUA MANSA RD BETWEEN S. RIVERSIDE AVE AND S. RANCHO AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED1 AGUA MANSA RD BETWEEN S. RIVERSIDE AVE AND S. RANCHO AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 1 56 X 0 1 1 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 1 54 X 0 1 1 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 3 0 52 XXX 3 0 3 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 1 51 X 0 1 1 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 2 50 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 6 4 49 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 * PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 6 48 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 6 5 47 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 P ADT: 0
46 4 6 46 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 A
45 8 9 45 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 C
44 7 4 44 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 E
43 5 2 43 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 4 3 42 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
41 0 2 41 XX 0 2 2 *
40 4 0 40 XXXX 4 0 4 85TH %: 49.0 49.5 49.2 M.P.H.
39 0 3 39 XXX 0 3 3
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 45.8 45.7 45.7 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 42.5 41.9 42.2 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 42 - 51 41 - 50 41 - 50 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 87% 86% 87%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 6% 6% 6%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 7% 8% 8%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 45.76 45.70 45.73 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 10.00 13.28 11.46
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.16 3.64 3.39 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.27 0.11
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.43 0.52 0.33 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
54 50 104
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:06 AM TO 10:22 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED2 BARTON RD BETWEEN WASHINGTON ST AND SOUTH CITY BOUNDARY LIMITS.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED2 BARTON RD BETWEEN WASHINGTON ST AND SOUTH CITY BOUNDARY LIMITS. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 1 0 58 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 1 1 56 XX 1 1 2 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 2 0 55 XX 2 0 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 3 1 53 XXXX 3 1 4 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 3 3 52 XXXXXX 3 3 6 * STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 4 3 51 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 1 5 50 XXXXXX 1 5 6 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 5 4 49 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 P PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 6 7 48 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 A DEVELOPMENT:
47 5 6 47 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 C ADT: 0
46 3 4 46 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 E
45 3 5 45 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 *
44 2 4 44 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
43 4 3 43 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 3 1 42 XXXX 3 1 4
41 3 2 41 XXXXX 3 2 5
40 0 2 40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 52.2 50.7 51.4 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 1 1 38 XX 1 1 2 50TH %: 47.6 46.9 47.2 M.P.H.
37 0 0 37 0 0 0
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 43.0 43.1 43.0 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 43 - 52 43 - 52 43 - 52 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 72% 85% 78%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 14% 4% 9%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 14% 12% 13%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 47.62 46.88 47.25 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19.46 13.56 16.42
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.41 3.68 4.05 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.26 0.16
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.62 0.51 0.40 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 52 102
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:02 AM TO 9:37 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED3 BARTON RD BETWEEN S.LA CADENA DR AND E.CITY LIMITS .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED3 BARTON RD BETWEEN S.LA CADENA DR AND E.CITY LIMITS . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 1 0 53 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 1 0 52 X 1 0 1 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 1 1 50 XX 1 1 2 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 3 4 49 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 4 2 48 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 5 3 47 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * ADT: 0
46 5 7 46 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 *
45 6 5 45 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 P
44 3 4 44 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 A
43 2 0 43 XX 2 0 2 C EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 5 0 42 XXXXX 5 0 5 E
41 1 2 41 XXX 1 2 3 *
40 3 4 40 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * 85TH %: 48.3 47.4 47.9 M.P.H. 39 4 6 39 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 *
38 3 2 38 XXXXX 3 2 5 50TH %: 42.9 41.8 42.4 M.P.H.
37 0 3 37 XXX 0 3 3
36 2 0 36 XX 2 0 2 15TH %: 37.4 36.3 36.9 M.P.H.
35 1 3 35 XXXX 1 3 4
34 3 2 34 XXXXX 3 2 5 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 39 - 48 39 - 48 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 1 0 32 X 1 0 1 % IN PACE: 69% 65% 67%
31 0 2 31 XX 0 2 2
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 11% 10% 10%
29 1 1 29 XX 1 1 2
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 20% 25% 23%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 42.87 41.82 42.37 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27.52 28.87 28.18
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.25 5.37 5.31 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.57 0.27
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.71 0.75 0.52 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
55 51 106
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON
I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:58 AM TO 10:43 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED4 C STREET BETWEEN N.RANCHO AVE AND COLTON AVE .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED4 C STREET BETWEEN N.RANCHO AVE AND COLTON AVE . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 34.0 33.4 33.7 M.P.H.
39 1 1 39 XX 1 1 2
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 29.3 29.1 29.2 M.P.H.
37 0 0 37 0 0 0
36 2 0 36 XX 2 0 2 15TH %: 24.6 24.9 24.8 M.P.H.
35 4 3 35 XXXXXXX 4 3 7
34 5 6 34 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 25 - 34 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 5 5 33 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
32 1 3 32 XXXX 1 3 4 * % IN PACE: 73% 78% 75%
31 3 4 31 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 P
30 4 0 30 XXXX 4 0 4 A % OVER PACE: 13% 7% 10%
29 6 7 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 C
28 0 6 28 XXXXXX 0 6 6 E % UNDER PACE: 13% 15% 14%
27 4 3 27 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
26 5 4 26 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29.29 29.15 29.22 M.P.H. 25 5 4 25 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
24 2 4 24 XXXXXX 2 4 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20.72 16.62 18.46 23 2 1 23 XXX 2 1 3
22 0 3 22 XXX 0 3 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.55 4.08 4.30 M.P.H. 21 1 0 21 X 1 0 1
20 2 0 20 XX 2 0 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.31 0.17 19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.55 0.42 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 54 106
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Thursday, March 10, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:12 AM TO 10:48 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED5 COLTON AVE BETWEEN NORTH CITY LIMIT AND E. E ST.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED5 COLTON AVE BETWEEN NORTH CITY LIMIT AND E. E ST. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 1 45 X 0 1 1
44 0 1 44 X 0 1 1
43 1 0 43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 1 1 42 XX 1 1 2
41 0 1 41 X 0 1 1
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 38.1 39.5 38.8 M.P.H.
39 3 4 39 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
38 5 6 38 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * 50TH %: 35.2 35.8 35.5 M.P.H. 37 8 8 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 *
36 6 7 36 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 P 15TH %: 32.3 32.1 32.2 M.P.H. 35 5 6 35 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 A
34 7 5 34 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 C 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 30 - 39 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 4 4 33 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 E
32 9 2 32 XXXXXXXXXXX 9 2 11 * % IN PACE: 96% 88% 92%
31 3 1 31 XXXX 3 1 4 *
30 0 2 30 XX 0 2 2 * % OVER PACE: 4% 8% 6%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 1 28 X 0 1 1 % UNDER PACE: 0% 4% 2%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 1 26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35.19 35.78 35.49 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 7.73 12.53 10.10
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 2.78 3.54 3.18 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.15 0.25 0.10
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.50 0.31 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 51 103
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 1, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:55 PM TO 2:25 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED6 CENTER ST BETWEEN S.RIVERSIDE AVE AND S.CITY LIMITS.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED6 CENTER ST BETWEEN S.RIVERSIDE AVE AND S.CITY LIMITS. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 1 48 X 0 1 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 0 47 X 1 0 1 ADT: 0
46 0 2 46 XX 0 2 2
45 3 0 45 XXX 3 0 3 *
44 0 2 44 XX 0 2 2 *
43 0 2 43 XX 0 2 2 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 6 5 42 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 P
41 3 7 41 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 A
40 6 5 40 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 C 85TH %: 42.5 43.0 42.8 M.P.H. 39 8 4 39 XXXXXXXXXXXX 8 4 12 E
38 5 4 38 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * 50TH %: 38.0 38.5 38.2 M.P.H. 37 4 3 37 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
36 3 5 36 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 * 15TH %: 33.4 33.9 33.6 M.P.H. 35 1 1 35 XX 1 1 2
34 1 2 34 XXX 1 2 3 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 35 - 44 36 - 45 M.P.H. 33 1 0 33 X 1 0 1
32 0 4 32 XXXX 0 4 4 % IN PACE: 76% 75% 74%
31 4 2 31 XXXXXX 4 2 6
30 3 0 30 XXX 3 0 3 % OVER PACE: 2% 6% 4%
29 0 2 29 XX 0 2 2
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 22% 20% 22%
27 1 0 27 X 1 0 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37.96 38.45 38.21 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19.55 19.49 19.39
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.42 4.42 4.40 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.38 0.19
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.62 0.44 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 51 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 11:04 AM TO 11:48 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED7 COOLEY DR BETWEEN E. COOLEY LN AND WASHINGTON ST .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED7 COOLEY DR BETWEEN E. COOLEY LN AND WASHINGTON ST . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 1 0 50 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 1 46 X 0 1 1
45 1 0 45 X 1 0 1
44 1 0 44 X 1 0 1
43 3 0 43 XXX 3 0 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 0 42 XX 2 0 2
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 39.7 37.4 38.6 M.P.H.
39 0 3 39 XXX 0 3 3
38 1 1 38 XX 1 1 2 50TH %: 33.8 32.9 33.4 M.P.H.
37 2 4 37 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
36 4 5 36 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * 15TH %: 27.9 28.5 28.2 M.P.H. 35 6 4 35 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
34 5 6 34 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 P 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 3 4 33 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 A
32 5 3 32 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 C % IN PACE: 73% 81% 77%
31 2 5 31 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 E
30 4 5 30 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * % OVER PACE: 18% 11% 14%
29 3 4 29 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
28 3 3 28 XXXXXX 3 3 6 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 8% 9%
27 1 0 27 X 1 0 1
26 0 2 26 XX 0 2 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33.80 32.94 33.37 M.P.H. 25 2 1 25 XXX 2 1 3
24 1 0 24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32.44 18.29 25.17
23 1 1 23 XX 1 1 2
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.70 4.28 5.02 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.64 0.35 0.24
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.80 0.59 0.49 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 53 104
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:15 PM TO 1:32 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED8 COOLEY DR BETWEEN S. MT VERNON AVE AND E. COOLEY LN.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED8 COOLEY DR BETWEEN S. MT VERNON AVE AND E. COOLEY LN. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 1 0 53 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 1 51 X 0 1 1 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 1 49 X 0 1 1 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 1 48 X 0 1 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 3 47 XXX 0 3 3 ADT: 0
46 2 0 46 XX 2 0 2
45 0 1 45 X 0 1 1
44 2 3 44 XXXXX 2 3 5
43 4 2 43 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 6 4 42 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
41 3 1 41 XXXX 3 1 4 *
40 5 4 40 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 P 85TH %: 43.6 44.4 44.0 M.P.H. 39 4 3 39 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 A
38 3 5 38 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 C 50TH %: 37.8 38.9 38.3 M.P.H. 37 2 4 37 XXXXXX 2 4 6 E
36 3 6 36 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 * 15TH %: 32.1 33.3 32.7 M.P.H. 35 5 3 35 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
34 4 2 34 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 35 - 44 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 1 0 33 X 1 0 1
32 2 2 32 XXXX 2 2 4 % IN PACE: 74% 70% 71%
31 3 0 31 XXX 3 0 3
30 0 1 30 X 0 1 1 % OVER PACE: 9% 14% 15%
29 0 2 29 XX 0 2 2
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 17% 16% 15%
27 0 1 27 X 0 1 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37.85 38.88 38.35 M.P.H. 25 2 0 25 XX 2 0 2
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 30.78 28.56 29.68
23 1 0 23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.55 5.34 5.45 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.57 0.29
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.76 0.76 0.54 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
53 50 103
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:46 PM TO 1:48 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED9 EUCALYPTUS AVE BETWEEN W.RANDALL AVE AND SAN BERNARDINO AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED9 EUCALYPTUS AVE BETWEEN W.RANDALL AVE AND SAN BERNARDINO AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 32.9 33.0 32.9 M.P.H.
39 1 0 39 X 1 0 1
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 29.2 29.1 29.2 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 1 0 36 X 1 0 1 15TH %: 25.5 25.3 25.4 M.P.H.
35 3 4 35 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
34 2 1 34 XXX 2 1 3 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 2 3 33 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
32 5 6 32 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * % IN PACE: 84% 84% 84%
31 4 5 31 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
30 3 7 30 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 P % OVER PACE: 10% 12% 13%
29 4 1 29 XXXXX 4 1 5 A
28 6 4 28 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 C % UNDER PACE: 6% 4% 3%
27 5 4 27 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 E
26 7 5 26 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29.20 29.14 29.17 M.P.H. 25 4 3 25 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
24 2 5 24 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13.06 13.68 13.24 23 1 1 23 XX 1 1 2
22 0 1 22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.61 3.70 3.64 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.27 0.13
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.51 0.52 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 51 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:10 AM TO 9:53 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED10 FAIRWAY DR BETWEEN N. MT VERNON AVE AND AUTO PLAZA DR.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED10 FAIRWAY DR BETWEEN N. MT VERNON AVE AND AUTO PLAZA DR. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 2 0 47 XX 2 0 2 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 1 0 45 X 1 0 1
44 3 2 44 XXXXX 3 2 5
43 3 1 43 XXXX 3 1 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 2 3 42 XXXXX 2 3 5
41 1 2 41 XXX 1 2 3
40 2 1 40 XXX 2 1 3 85TH %: 41.7 40.0 40.9 M.P.H.
39 3 2 39 XXXXX 3 2 5 *
38 1 4 38 XXXXX 1 4 5 * 50TH %: 36.2 35.4 35.8 M.P.H. 37 4 5 37 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
36 3 5 36 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 P 15TH %: 30.7 30.8 30.8 M.P.H. 35 2 4 35 XXXXXX 2 4 6 A
34 6 3 34 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 C 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 29 - 38 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 2 5 33 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 E
32 4 3 32 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * % IN PACE: 64% 74% 68%
31 4 3 31 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
30 3 2 30 XXXXX 3 2 5 * % OVER PACE: 28% 22% 23%
29 1 3 29 XXXX 1 3 4
28 3 0 28 XXX 3 0 3 % UNDER PACE: 8% 4% 9%
27 0 1 27 X 0 1 1
26 0 1 26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36.22 35.40 35.81 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 28.18 19.51 23.77
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.31 4.42 4.88 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.56 0.39 0.24
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.75 0.62 0.49 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 1, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:05 PM TO 12:39 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED11 HUNTS LN BETWEEN W.REDLANDS BLVD AND WASHINGTON ST .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED11 HUNTS LN BETWEEN W.REDLANDS BLVD AND WASHINGTON ST . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 2 52 XX 0 2 2 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 1 50 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 2 0 49 XX 2 0 2 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 2 48 XX 0 2 2 DEVELOPMENT:
47 2 4 47 XXXXXX 2 4 6 ADT: 0
46 1 0 46 X 1 0 1
45 1 3 45 XXXX 1 3 4
44 3 0 44 XXX 3 0 3
43 2 2 43 XXXX 2 2 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 1 3 42 XXXX 1 3 4
41 5 0 41 XXXXX 5 0 5 *
40 0 3 40 XXX 0 3 3 * 85TH %: 43.0 45.3 44.4 M.P.H.
39 1 3 39 XXXX 1 3 4 *
38 0 4 38 XXXX 0 4 4 P 50TH %: 35.6 39.1 37.3 M.P.H.
37 2 5 37 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 A
36 5 5 36 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 C 15TH %: 28.1 32.9 30.3 M.P.H. 35 1 2 35 XXX 1 2 3 E
34 3 4 34 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 31 - 40 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 2 2 33 XXXX 2 2 4 *
32 3 2 32 XXXXX 3 2 5 * % IN PACE: 50% 63% 51%
31 2 2 31 XXXX 2 2 4
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 40% 33% 29%
29 3 1 29 XXXX 3 1 4
28 2 0 28 XX 2 0 2 % UNDER PACE: 10% 4% 20%
27 4 1 27 XXXXX 4 1 5
26 2 0 26 XX 2 0 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35.56 39.08 37.34 M.P.H. 25 2 0 25 XX 2 0 2
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 52.09 35.79 46.55
23 1 0 23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7.22 5.98 6.82 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 1.04 0.70 0.46
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.02 0.84 0.68 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 51 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 11:05 AM TO 11:52 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED12 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN N. MT VERNON AVE AND N. 8TH ST.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED12 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN N. MT VERNON AVE AND N. 8TH ST. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 1 0 43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 2 0 41 XX 2 0 2
40 0 2 40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 37.8 36.6 37.2 M.P.H.
39 2 0 39 XX 2 0 2
38 4 3 38 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * 50TH %: 34.1 33.3 33.7 M.P.H. 37 2 3 37 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
36 5 5 36 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 * 15TH %: 30.5 29.9 30.2 M.P.H. 35 6 7 35 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 P
34 7 5 34 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 A 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 5 6 33 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 C
32 4 3 32 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E % IN PACE: 86% 92% 89%
31 5 5 31 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
30 3 4 30 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * % OVER PACE: 6% 4% 7%
29 2 6 29 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 *
28 1 0 28 X 1 0 1 % UNDER PACE: 8% 4% 4%
27 0 2 27 XX 0 2 2
26 1 0 26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34.14 33.27 33.70 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 12.25 10.44 11.41
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.50 3.23 3.38 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.20 0.11
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.45 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 51 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 1, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 11:10 AM TO 12:06 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED13 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN N. 8TH ST AND VALLEY BLVD .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED13 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN N. 8TH ST AND VALLEY BLVD . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 1 42 X 0 1 1
41 2 0 41 XX 2 0 2
40 0 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 35.3 35.8 35.5 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 0 1 38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 31.1 31.8 31.4 M.P.H.
37 1 2 37 XXX 1 2 3 *
36 4 2 36 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * 15TH %: 26.8 27.8 27.3 M.P.H. 35 5 5 35 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
34 3 4 34 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 P 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 5 5 33 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 A
32 4 5 32 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 C % IN PACE: 81% 84% 82%
31 4 7 31 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 E
30 2 4 30 XXXXXX 2 4 6 * % OVER PACE: 6% 6% 5%
29 7 6 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 *
28 6 3 28 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 10% 14%
27 2 0 27 XX 2 0 2
26 3 1 26 XXXX 3 1 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31.06 31.78 31.42 M.P.H. 25 1 3 25 XXXX 1 3 4
24 1 0 24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17.08 14.69 15.87
23 2 1 23 XXX 2 1 3
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.13 3.83 3.98 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.29 0.15
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.57 0.54 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 51 103
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Thursday, March 10, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:15 AM TO 10:35 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED14 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN VALLEY BLVD AND BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED14 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN VALLEY BLVD AND BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 1 56 X 0 1 1 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 1 0 55 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 2 54 XX 0 2 2 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 3 0 53 XXX 3 0 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 1 2 52 XXX 1 2 3 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 3 3 51 XXXXXX 3 3 6 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 3 50 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 4 5 49 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 2 48 XXXXX 3 2 5 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 2 47 XXX 1 2 3 ADT: 0
46 2 3 46 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
45 4 1 45 XXXXX 4 1 5 *
44 2 1 44 XXX 2 1 3 *
43 4 0 43 XXXX 4 0 4 P NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 1 1 42 XX 1 1 2 A
41 5 5 41 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 C
40 5 6 40 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 E 85TH %: 49.8 49.8 49.8 M.P.H. 39 5 5 39 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
38 4 3 38 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * 50TH %: 44.4 43.7 44.1 M.P.H. 37 1 5 37 XXXXXX 1 5 6 *
36 2 1 36 XXX 2 1 3 15TH %: 39.0 37.6 38.3 M.P.H.
35 0 1 35 X 0 1 1
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 37 - 46 37 - 46 M.P.H. 33 0 1 33 X 0 1 1
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 60% 57% 58%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 35% 38% 37%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 5% 6% 5%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 44.38 43.74 44.06 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27.02 34.62 30.57
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.20 5.88 5.53 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.65 0.28
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.70 0.81 0.53 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
55 53 108
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:43 AM TO 9:58 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED15 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS AND S.CITY LIMITS .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED15 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS AND S.CITY LIMITS . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 1 62 X 0 1 1 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 MPH
60 1 2 60 XXX 1 2 3 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 1 59 X 0 1 1 COMMENTS:
58 1 0 58 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 3 57 XXX 0 3 3
56 2 0 56 XX 2 0 2 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 1 4 55 XXXXX 1 4 5 * ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 4 5 54 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * NUMBER OF LANES:
53 2 3 53 XXXXX 2 3 5 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 4 7 52 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 P STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 7 6 51 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 A EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 2 50 XXXXXX 4 2 6 C DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 9 4 49 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 4 13 E PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0 48 6 2 48 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 4 1 47 XXXXX 4 1 5 * ADT: 0
46 0 3 46 XXX 0 3 3 *
45 1 0 45 X 1 0 1
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 2 0 43 XX 2 0 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 1 0 42 X 1 0 1
41 0 3 41 XXX 0 3 3
40 1 0 40 X 1 0 1 85TH %: 54.7 57.1 55.9 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 1 0 38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 48.9 50.4 49.6 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 43.1 43.6 43.3 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 2 1 34 XXX 2 1 3 10 MPH PACE: 47 - 56 46 - 55 46 - 55 M.P.H. 33 0 2 33 XX 0 2 2
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 80% 73% 74%
31 1 0 31 X 1 0 1
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 4% 14% 10%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 17% 14% 15%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 48.87 50.35 49.59 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 31.51 42.43 37.01
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.61 6.51 6.08 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.83 0.35
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.76 0.91 0.59 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
54 51 105
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON
I I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 2:16 PM TO 3:05 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED16 LAUREL ST BETWEEN GRAND AVE AND PENNSYLVANIA AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED16 LAUREL ST BETWEEN GRAND AVE AND PENNSYLVANIA AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 2 0 47 XX 2 0 2 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 2 45 XX 0 2 2
44 0 1 44 X 0 1 1
43 0 2 43 XX 0 2 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 1 1 42 XX 1 1 2
41 0 1 41 X 0 1 1
40 3 1 40 XXXX 3 1 4 * 85TH %: 39.5 39.9 39.7 M.P.H.
39 2 2 39 XXXX 2 2 4 *
38 5 3 38 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * 50TH %: 35.4 35.0 35.2 M.P.H. 37 6 4 37 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 P
36 4 3 36 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 A 15TH %: 31.4 30.2 30.8 M.P.H. 35 4 5 35 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 C
34 6 6 34 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 E 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 30 - 39 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 5 4 33 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
32 6 4 32 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 * % IN PACE: 90% 76% 80%
31 4 3 31 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
30 0 4 30 XXXX 0 4 4 % OVER PACE: 6% 16% 10%
29 1 2 29 XXX 1 2 3
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 4% 8% 10%
27 1 1 27 XX 1 1 2
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35.42 35.04 35.23 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 1 24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 15.35 21.63 18.34
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.92 4.65 4.28 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.31 0.43 0.18
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.55 0.66 0.43 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 1, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:15 PM TO 2:12 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED17 LAUREL ST BETWEEN PENNSYLVANIA AVE AND N. MT VERNON AVE .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED17 LAUREL ST BETWEEN PENNSYLVANIA AVE AND N. MT VERNON AVE . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 1 46 X 0 1 1
45 1 1 45 XX 1 1 2
44 0 1 44 X 0 1 1
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 2 0 42 XX 2 0 2
41 2 1 41 XXX 2 1 3
40 0 2 40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 37.6 38.6 38.1 M.P.H.
39 2 3 39 XXXXX 2 3 5
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 33.2 33.3 33.2 M.P.H.
37 0 2 37 XX 0 2 2
36 3 2 36 XXXXX 3 2 5 * 15TH %: 28.8 28.0 28.4 M.P.H. 35 6 4 35 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
34 4 6 34 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 28 - 37 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 7 4 33 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 P
32 5 6 32 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 A % IN PACE: 84% 75% 79%
31 5 4 31 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 C
30 4 3 30 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E % OVER PACE: 14% 18% 18%
29 3 3 29 XXXXXX 3 3 6 *
28 2 4 28 XXXXXX 2 4 6 * % UNDER PACE: 2% 8% 3%
27 3 2 27 XXXXX 3 2 5 *
26 1 0 26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33.18 33.29 33.24 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 1 24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17.86 25.81 21.66
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.23 5.08 4.65 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 1 20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.36 0.51 0.21
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.60 0.71 0.46 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 51 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 1, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:05 AM TO 10:05 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED18 M ST BETWEEN S. LA CADENA DR AND MT VERNON AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED18 M ST BETWEEN S. LA CADENA DR AND MT VERNON AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 2 49 XX 0 2 2 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 0 48 XXX 3 0 3 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 2 47 XX 0 2 2 ADT: 0
46 0 3 46 XXX 0 3 3
45 2 1 45 XXX 2 1 3
44 1 1 44 XX 1 1 2
43 4 0 43 XXXX 4 0 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 1 1 42 XX 1 1 2
41 5 5 41 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
40 5 6 40 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * 85TH %: 43.3 43.7 43.5 M.P.H. 39 5 5 39 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
38 4 3 38 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 P 50TH %: 38.3 38.6 38.5 M.P.H. 37 1 5 37 XXXXXX 1 5 6 A
36 4 2 36 XXXXXX 4 2 6 C 15TH %: 33.3 33.5 33.4 M.P.H. 35 4 3 35 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E
34 1 4 34 XXXXX 1 4 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 33 - 42 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 4 2 33 XXXXXX 4 2 6 *
32 3 1 32 XXXX 3 1 4 * % IN PACE: 72% 72% 72%
31 0 2 31 XX 0 2 2
30 2 1 30 XXX 2 1 3 % OVER PACE: 22% 18% 21%
29 0 1 29 X 0 1 1
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 6% 10% 7%
27 1 0 27 X 1 0 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38.28 38.64 38.46 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23.31 24.15 23.52
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.83 4.91 4.85 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.48 0.24
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.68 0.70 0.49 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:05 AM TO 10:42 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED19 MERIDIAN AVE BETWEEN RANDALL AVE AND W. VALLEY BLVD.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED19 MERIDIAN AVE BETWEEN RANDALL AVE AND W. VALLEY BLVD. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 2 0 47 XX 2 0 2 ADT: 0
46 1 3 46 XXXX 1 3 4
45 3 2 45 XXXXX 3 2 5
44 1 1 44 XX 1 1 2
43 4 0 43 XXXX 4 0 4 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 4 3 42 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
41 4 5 41 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
40 5 6 40 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 P 85TH %: 43.6 42.2 42.9 M.P.H. 39 7 6 39 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 A
38 3 5 38 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 C 50TH %: 39.3 38.3 38.8 M.P.H. 37 5 6 37 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 E
36 4 6 36 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 15TH %: 34.9 34.5 34.7 M.P.H. 35 2 5 35 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 *
34 1 3 34 XXXX 1 3 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 33 - 42 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 0 2 33 XX 0 2 2
32 2 1 32 XXX 2 1 3 % IN PACE: 80% 85% 80%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 6% 11% 12%
29 1 1 29 XX 1 1 2
28 1 0 28 X 1 0 1 % UNDER PACE: 14% 4% 8%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39.28 38.35 38.79 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17.59 13.56 15.55
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.19 3.68 3.94 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.25 0.15
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.59 0.50 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 55 105
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:27 PM TO 1:52 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED20 MILL ST BETWEEN N. RANCHO AVE AND BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED20 MILL ST BETWEEN N. RANCHO AVE AND BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 1 0 50 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 1 49 X 0 1 1 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 1 0 48 X 1 0 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 1 2 46 XXX 1 2 3
45 2 3 45 XXXXX 2 3 5
44 1 0 44 X 1 0 1
43 0 2 43 XX 0 2 2 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 4 6 42 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 *
41 3 1 41 XXXX 3 1 4 *
40 5 4 40 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 P 85TH %: 42.4 43.0 42.7 M.P.H. 39 3 6 39 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 A
38 3 4 38 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 C 50TH %: 36.6 37.9 37.2 M.P.H. 37 4 3 37 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E
36 4 5 36 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * 15TH %: 30.8 32.8 31.8 M.P.H. 35 3 5 35 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 *
34 3 2 34 XXXXX 3 2 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 34 - 43 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 0 1 33 X 0 1 1
32 3 2 32 XXXXX 3 2 5 % IN PACE: 59% 72% 65%
31 2 1 31 XXX 2 1 3
30 4 3 30 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 % OVER PACE: 11% 11% 11%
29 5 0 29 XXXXX 5 0 5
28 1 0 28 X 1 0 1 % UNDER PACE: 30% 17% 23%
27 0 2 27 XX 0 2 2
26 1 0 26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36.59 37.87 37.22 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 31.23 24.08 27.84
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.59 4.91 5.28 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.45 0.26
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.76 0.67 0.51 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
54 53 107
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:12 PM TO 13:08 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED21 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN JOHNSTON ST AND GRANT AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED21 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN JOHNSTON ST AND GRANT AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 LANES PER DIRECTION:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 28.0 28.5 28.3 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 24.7 25.1 24.9 M.P.H.
37 0 0 37 0 0 0
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 21.3 21.7 21.5 M.P.H.
35 1 0 35 x 1 0 1
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 20 - 29 20 - 29 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 3 32 xxx 0 3 3 % IN PACE: 88% 84% 86%
31 2 2 31 xxxx 2 2 4
30 0 2 30 xx 0 2 2 % OVER PACE: 6% 14% 10%
29 3 1 29 xxxx 3 1 4 *
28 1 2 28 XXX 1 2 3 * % UNDER PACE: 6% 2% 4%
27 6 3 27 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 *
26 4 6 26 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 P ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24.68 25.14 24.91 M.P.H. 25 7 8 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 A
24 8 9 24 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 C SAMPLE VARIANCE: 10.55 10.74 10.59 23 7 5 23 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 E
22 5 2 22 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.25 3.28 3.25 M.P.H. 21 3 3 21 XXXXXX 3 3 6 *
20 0 3 20 XXX 0 3 3 * VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.21 0.11 19 2 1 19 XXX 2 1 3
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.46 0.33 M.P.H. 17 1 0 17 X 1 0 1
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, February 23, 2022
City of Colton
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:06 AM TO 9:28 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED22 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN E. CITRUS ST-GRANT AVE. AND VALLEY BLVD.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED22 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN E. CITRUS ST-GRANT AVE. AND VALLEY BLVD. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 1 0 55 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 2 1 54 XXX 2 1 3 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 2 0 52 XX 2 0 2 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 1 1 51 XX 1 1 2 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 3 0 50 XXX 3 0 3 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 2 0 49 XX 2 0 2 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 0 48 XXX 3 0 3 DEVELOPMENT:
47 4 0 47 XXXX 4 0 4 ADT: 0
46 2 0 46 XX 2 0 2
45 1 2 45 XXX 1 2 3
44 0 1 44 X 0 1 1
43 3 0 43 XXX 3 0 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 0 42 XX 2 0 2
41 3 0 41 XXX 3 0 3 *
40 2 1 40 XXX 2 1 3 * 85TH %: 49.1 41.6 46.1 M.P.H.
39 5 6 39 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 *
38 4 8 38 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 P 50TH %: 42.4 36.9 39.7 M.P.H. 37 3 6 37 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 A
36 1 6 36 XXXXXXX 1 6 7 C 15TH %: 35.8 32.2 33.3 M.P.H. 35 3 5 35 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 E
34 4 6 34 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 0 4 33 XXXX 0 4 4 *
32 1 3 32 XXXX 1 3 4 * % IN PACE: 57% 87% 68%
31 1 0 31 X 1 0 1
30 0 1 30 X 0 1 1 % OVER PACE: 40% 10% 30%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 1 28 X 0 1 1 % UNDER PACE: 4% 4% 3%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 42.43 36.92 39.70 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 40.87 20.62 38.21
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6.39 4.54 6.18 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.77 0.40 0.36
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.88 0.63 0.60 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
53 52 105
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:45 PM TO 2:08 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED23 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN E. VALLEY BLVD AND COOLEY DR.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED23 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN E. VALLEY BLVD AND COOLEY DR. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 0 47 X 1 0 1 ADT: 0
46 1 0 46 X 1 0 1
45 1 1 45 XX 1 1 2
44 2 1 44 XXX 2 1 3
43 0 1 43 X 0 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 1 42 X 0 1 1
41 0 3 41 XXX 0 3 3
40 0 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 39.3 39.3 39.3 M.P.H.
39 1 3 39 XXXX 1 3 4
38 5 4 38 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * 50TH %: 34.4 34.6 34.5 M.P.H. 37 4 0 37 XXXX 4 0 4 *
36 5 3 36 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * 15TH %: 29.4 29.8 29.6 M.P.H. 35 2 4 35 XXXXXX 2 4 6 P
34 3 6 34 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 A 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 30 - 39 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 5 2 33 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 C
32 4 6 32 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 E % IN PACE: 82% 72% 77%
31 5 5 31 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
30 6 3 30 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 * % OVER PACE: 12% 16% 17%
29 3 3 29 XXXXXX 3 3 6 *
28 2 2 28 XXXX 2 2 4 % UNDER PACE: 6% 12% 6%
27 1 0 27 X 1 0 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34.37 34.58 34.48 M.P.H. 25 0 1 25 X 0 1 1
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22.96 21.11 21.83
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.79 4.59 4.67 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.42 0.22
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.67 0.65 0.46 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 50 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:02 AM TO 9:43 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED24 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN COOLEY DR AND WASHINGTON ST .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED24 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN COOLEY DR AND WASHINGTON ST . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 1 0 45 X 1 0 1
44 0 1 44 X 0 1 1
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 2 42 XXXX 2 2 4
41 1 2 41 XXX 1 2 3
40 3 2 40 XXXXX 3 2 5 85TH %: 39.2 39.6 39.4 M.P.H.
39 4 5 39 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
38 3 7 38 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 * 50TH %: 33.9 34.9 34.4 M.P.H. 37 5 3 37 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
36 2 5 36 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 P 15TH %: 28.5 30.2 29.4 M.P.H. 35 6 2 35 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 A
34 0 5 34 XXXXX 0 5 5 C 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 30 - 39 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 2 4 33 XXXXXX 2 4 6 E
32 3 1 32 XXXX 3 1 4 * % IN PACE: 61% 77% 69%
31 3 4 31 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
30 3 5 30 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 * % OVER PACE: 8% 13% 13%
29 4 0 29 XXXX 4 0 4
28 3 2 28 XXXXX 3 2 5 % UNDER PACE: 31% 9% 17%
27 3 1 27 XXXX 3 1 4
26 0 1 26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33.86 34.94 34.41 M.P.H. 25 2 0 25 XX 2 0 2
24 1 0 24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26.36 20.52 23.45
23 0 1 23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.13 4.53 4.84 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.52 0.39 0.23
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.72 0.62 0.47 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 53 104
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:58 PM TO 2:52 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED25 CITRUS ST BETWEEN TERESA AVE AND RANCHO AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED25 CITRUS ST BETWEEN TERESA AVE AND RANCHO AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 1 0 42 X 1 0 1
41 1 0 41 X 1 0 1
40 0 2 40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 35.7 34.6 35.1 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 1 0 38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 30.6 30.5 30.6 M.P.H.
37 1 1 37 XX 1 1 2
36 3 2 36 XXXXX 3 2 5 * 15TH %: 25.6 26.4 26.0 M.P.H. 35 0 2 35 XX 0 2 2 *
34 6 4 34 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 25 - 34 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 7 8 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 P
32 5 6 32 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 A % IN PACE: 75% 80% 77%
31 4 5 31 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 C
30 2 4 30 XXXXXX 2 4 6 E % OVER PACE: 8% 13% 7%
29 5 3 29 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
28 3 4 28 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * % UNDER PACE: 18% 7% 17%
27 3 6 27 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 *
26 2 0 26 XX 2 0 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30.61 30.50 30.55 M.P.H. 25 0 5 25 XXXXX 0 5 5
24 1 4 24 XXXXX 1 4 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23.72 15.71 19.34 23 2 0 23 XX 2 0 2
22 1 0 22 X 1 0 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.87 3.96 4.40 M.P.H. 21 2 0 21 XX 2 0 2
20 1 0 20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.28 0.18
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.68 0.53 0.43 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 56 107
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:28 PM TO 1:19 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED26 OLIVE ST BETWEEN MERIDIAN AVE AND N. RANCHO AVE RAIL RD.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED26 OLIVE ST BETWEEN MERIDIAN AVE AND N. RANCHO AVE RAIL RD. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 31.9 31.8 31.9 M.P.H.
39 0 1 39 X 0 1 1
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 27.8 27.1 27.4 M.P.H.
37 1 1 37 XX 1 1 2
36 0 1 36 X 0 1 1 15TH %: 23.7 22.3 23.0 M.P.H.
35 1 0 35 X 1 0 1
34 3 1 34 XXXX 3 1 4 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 2 4 33 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
32 3 0 32 XXX 3 0 3 * % IN PACE: 80% 74% 77%
31 2 2 31 XXXX 2 2 4 *
30 5 4 30 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 P % OVER PACE: 10% 8% 9%
29 4 2 29 XXXXXX 4 2 6 A
28 3 4 28 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 C % UNDER PACE: 10% 18% 14%
27 5 6 27 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 E
26 4 6 26 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27.78 27.06 27.42 M.P.H. 25 7 3 25 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 *
24 5 6 24 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 15.69 21.32 18.45 23 2 1 23 XXX 2 1 3
22 0 1 22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.96 4.62 4.30 M.P.H. 21 2 3 21 XXXXX 2 3 5
20 0 2 20 XX 0 2 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.31 0.43 0.18 19 1 2 19 XXX 1 2 3
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.56 0.65 0.43 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Thursday, March 10, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:42 AM TO 10:31 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED27 OLIVE ST BETWEEN N. RANCHO AVE AND N. LA CADENA AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED27 OLIVE ST BETWEEN N. RANCHO AVE AND N. LA CADENA AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 31.6 31.7 31.6 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 27.0 27.0 27.0 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 2 1 36 XXX 2 1 3 15TH %: 22.4 22.3 22.4 M.P.H.
35 2 2 35 XXXX 2 2 4
34 2 0 34 XX 2 0 2 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 23 - 32 21 - 30 M.P.H. 33 0 1 33 X 0 1 1
32 2 4 32 XXXXXX 2 4 6 % IN PACE: 78% 72% 74%
31 1 3 31 XXXX 1 3 4
30 4 3 30 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * % OVER PACE: 18% 10% 21%
29 4 5 29 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
28 5 1 28 XXXXXX 5 1 6 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 18% 5%
27 6 4 27 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 P
26 3 3 26 XXXXXX 3 3 6 A ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27.04 26.98 27.01 M.P.H. 25 5 6 25 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 C
24 3 5 24 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 E SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19.63 20.51 19.87 23 3 2 23 XXXXX 3 2 5 *
22 4 3 22 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.43 4.53 4.46 M.P.H. 21 2 3 21 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
20 0 1 20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.41 0.20
19 0 2 19 XX 0 2 2
18 1 0 18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.64 0.45 M.P.H. 17 1 0 17 X 1 0 1
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:37 AM TO 11:32 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED28 PENNSYLVANIA AVE BETWEEN MILL ST AND W. VALLEY BLVD .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED28 PENNSYLVANIA AVE BETWEEN MILL ST AND W. VALLEY BLVD . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 1 45 X 0 1 1
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 2 1 43 XXX 2 1 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 1 0 42 X 1 0 1
41 2 1 41 XXX 2 1 3
40 1 2 40 XXX 1 2 3 85TH %: 37.8 37.7 37.7 M.P.H.
39 2 0 39 XX 2 0 2
38 1 3 38 XXXX 1 3 4 50TH %: 33.2 33.2 33.2 M.P.H.
37 0 2 37 XX 0 2 2
36 4 3 36 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * 15TH %: 28.5 28.6 28.6 M.P.H. 35 3 4 35 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
34 5 5 34 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 29 - 38 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 4 3 33 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 P
32 4 6 32 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 A % IN PACE: 78% 76% 77%
31 5 6 31 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 C
30 7 5 30 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 E % OVER PACE: 18% 10% 19% 29 2 1 29 XXX 2 1 3 *
28 4 3 28 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 14% 4%
27 1 2 27 XXX 1 2 3 *
26 1 1 26 XX 1 1 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33.16 33.16 33.16 M.P.H. 25 1 0 25 X 1 0 1
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19.89 19.32 19.41
23 0 1 23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.46 4.40 4.41 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.39 0.19
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.62 0.44 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:35 PM TO 1:52 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED29 PEPPER AVE BETWEEN RANDALL AVE AND W. VALLEY BLVD .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED29 PEPPER AVE BETWEEN RANDALL AVE AND W. VALLEY BLVD . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 1 0 61 X 1 0 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 1 58 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 1 56 X 0 1 1 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 1 0 55 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 3 1 54 XXXX 3 1 4 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 4 0 53 XXXX 4 0 4 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 2 1 52 XXX 2 1 3 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 4 51 XXXX 0 4 4 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 2 1 50 XXX 2 1 3 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 2 48 XXXXX 3 2 5 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 5 47 XXXXXX 1 5 6 * ADT: 0
46 4 3 46 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
45 4 1 45 XXXXX 4 1 5 P
44 0 2 44 XX 0 2 2 A
43 0 4 43 XXXX 0 4 4 C NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 6 42 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 E
41 0 5 41 XXXXX 0 5 5 *
40 2 6 40 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 * 85TH %: 49.6 49.7 49.9 M.P.H. 39 4 3 39 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
38 3 0 38 XXX 3 0 3 50TH %: 40.7 43.4 41.9 M.P.H.
37 2 1 37 XXX 2 1 3
36 5 0 36 XXXXX 5 0 5 15TH %: 31.8 37.1 34.0 M.P.H.
35 2 2 35 XXXX 2 2 4
34 2 0 34 XX 2 0 2 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 39 - 48 39 - 48 M.P.H. 33 5 0 33 XXXXX 5 0 5
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 48% 71% 50%
31 4 1 31 XXXXX 4 1 5
30 3 0 30 XXX 3 0 3 % OVER PACE: 46% 17% 19%
29 2 2 29 XXXX 2 2 4
28 1 0 28 X 1 0 1 % UNDER PACE: 6% 12% 31%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 1 0 26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40.73 43.42 41.95 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 73.62 36.92 58.37
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 8.58 6.08 7.64 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 1.17 0.71 0.51
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.08 0.84 0.71 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
63 52 115
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Thursday, March 10, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:48 PM TO 1:12 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED30 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN N. CITY LIMIT AND MILL ST.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED30 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN N. CITY LIMIT AND MILL ST. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 1 0 50 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 1 48 X 0 1 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 0 47 X 1 0 1 ADT: 0
46 2 2 46 XXXX 2 2 4
45 0 3 45 XXX 0 3 3
44 3 2 44 XXXXX 3 2 5
43 4 6 43 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 4 42 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
41 6 5 41 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 *
40 6 4 40 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 P 85TH %: 43.3 43.8 43.5 M.P.H. 39 4 3 39 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 A
38 2 1 38 XXX 2 1 3 C 50TH %: 38.6 38.2 38.4 M.P.H.
37 2 5 37 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 E
36 5 0 36 XXXXX 5 0 5 * 15TH %: 33.9 32.6 33.3 M.P.H. 35 3 0 35 XXX 3 0 3 *
34 5 2 34 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 37 - 46 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 3 4 33 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
32 2 5 32 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 % IN PACE: 74% 65% 64%
31 1 3 31 XXXX 1 3 4
30 0 2 30 XX 0 2 2 % OVER PACE: 13% 2% 14%
29 1 0 29 X 1 0 1
28 0 1 28 X 0 1 1 % UNDER PACE: 13% 33% 21%
27 0 1 27 X 0 1 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38.62 38.19 38.40 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20.39 28.98 24.54
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.52 5.38 4.95 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.54 0.23
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.62 0.73 0.48 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
53 54 107
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:20 PM TO 12:40 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED31 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN MILL ST AND W. VALLEY BLVD.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED31 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN MILL ST AND W. VALLEY BLVD. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 1 52 X 0 1 1 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 1 51 X 0 1 1 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 1 49 X 0 1 1 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 0 48 XXX 3 0 3 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 2 47 XX 0 2 2 ADT: 0
46 1 3 46 XXXX 1 3 4
45 4 1 45 XXXXX 4 1 5
44 1 1 44 XX 1 1 2
43 3 1 43 XXXX 3 1 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 0 42 XX 2 0 2
41 3 2 41 XXXXX 3 2 5
40 3 3 40 XXXXXX 3 3 6 * 85TH %: 43.6 43.9 43.8 M.P.H. 39 4 4 39 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 *
38 5 4 38 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * 50TH %: 38.4 37.7 38.0 M.P.H. 37 4 3 37 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 P
36 5 2 36 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 A 15TH %: 33.2 31.4 32.3 M.P.H. 35 3 1 35 XXXX 3 1 4 C
34 1 5 34 XXXXXX 1 5 6 E 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 3 4 33 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
32 2 3 32 XXXXX 2 3 5 * % IN PACE: 65% 66% 66%
31 4 4 31 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 *
30 0 2 30 XX 0 2 2 % OVER PACE: 8% 26% 29%
29 0 1 29 X 0 1 1
28 0 1 28 X 0 1 1 % UNDER PACE: 27% 8% 5%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 1 0 26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38.38 37.66 38.03 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25.34 36.56 30.66
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.03 6.05 5.54 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.73 0.30
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.70 0.86 0.55 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 50 102
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:12 PM TO 12:35 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED32 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN AGUA MANSA RD AND S.LA CADENA DRIVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED32 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN AGUA MANSA RD AND S.LA CADENA DRIVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 1 0 57 X 1 0 1
56 0 2 56 XX 0 2 2 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 1 0 55 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 1 0 54 X 1 0 1 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 2 2 53 XXXX 2 2 4 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 1 2 52 XXX 1 2 3 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 3 4 51 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 5 50 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR 49 2 2 49 XXXX 2 2 4 * PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 4 6 48 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 P DEVELOPMENT:
47 7 7 47 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 A ADT: 0
46 8 7 46 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 7 15 C
45 6 5 45 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 E
44 3 1 44 XXXX 3 1 4 *
43 2 4 43 XXXXXX 2 4 6 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 3 1 42 XXXX 3 1 4 *
41 2 1 41 XXX 2 1 3
40 0 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 51.0 51.2 51.1 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 1 0 38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 47.0 47.5 47.3 M.P.H.
37 0 0 37 0 0 0
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 43.1 43.9 43.5 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 42 - 51 43 - 52 42 - 51 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 82% 86% 83%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 12% 8% 12%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 6% 6% 5%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 47.02 47.54 47.28 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14.50 12.29 13.34
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.81 3.51 3.65 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.25 0.13
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.50 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 50 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:45 AM TO 11:48 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED33 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN W.VALLEY BOULEVARD AND AGUA MANSA ROAD .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED33 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN W.VALLEY BOULEVARD AND AGUA MANSA ROAD . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 1 54 X 0 1 1 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 1 2 53 XXX 1 2 3 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 4 3 52 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 7 3 51 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 * EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 6 2 50 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 P DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR 49 3 4 49 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 A PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 5 3 48 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 C DEVELOPMENT:
47 3 1 47 XXXX 3 1 4 E ADT: 0
46 5 3 46 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
45 3 4 45 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
44 6 2 44 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 *
43 3 0 43 XXX 3 0 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 4 42 XXXXXX 2 4 6
41 0 5 41 XXXXX 0 5 5
40 1 4 40 XXXXX 1 4 5 85TH %: 51.0 50.0 50.7 M.P.H.
39 0 3 39 XXX 0 3 3
38 1 4 38 XXXXX 1 4 5 50TH %: 47.3 44.8 46.0 M.P.H.
37 0 2 37 XX 0 2 2
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 43.7 39.5 41.3 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 43 - 52 37 - 46 44 - 53 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 90% 62% 70%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 2% 38% 1%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 8% 0% 29%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 47.32 44.76 46.04 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 12.51 25.70 20.56
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.54 5.07 4.53 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.25 0.51 0.21
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.72 0.45 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:15 PM TO 12:35 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED34 RECHE CANYON ROAD BETWEEN WASHINGTON ST AND S. CITY LIMIT.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED34 RECHE CANYON ROAD BETWEEN WASHINGTON ST AND S. CITY LIMIT. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 1 0 58 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 1 56 X 0 1 1 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 1 2 54 XXX 1 2 3 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 2 0 53 XX 2 0 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 3 1 51 XXXX 3 1 4 * EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 1 50 XXXXX 4 1 5 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 6 6 49 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 * PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0 48 5 8 48 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 P DEVELOPMENT:
47 6 8 47 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 A ADT: 0
46 3 6 46 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 C
45 4 5 45 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 E
44 5 3 44 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
43 4 0 43 XXXX 4 0 4 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 5 42 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 *
41 4 0 41 XXXX 4 0 4
40 0 2 40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 50.8 50.3 50.5 M.P.H.
39 1 0 39 X 1 0 1
38 0 2 38 XX 0 2 2 50TH %: 46.1 45.9 46.0 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 3 0 36 XXX 3 0 3 15TH %: 41.5 41.6 41.6 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 1 34 X 0 1 1 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 42 - 51 42 - 51 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 80% 83% 80%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 13% 6% 7%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 7% 12% 13%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 46.15 45.94 46.05 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20.09 17.35 18.58
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.48 4.17 4.31 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.33 0.18
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.61 0.58 0.42 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
54 52 106
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:25 PM TO 1:45 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED35 RIVERSIDE AVE BETWEEN AGUA MANSA RD AND PLACENTIA LN .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED35 RIVERSIDE AVE BETWEEN AGUA MANSA RD AND PLACENTIA LN . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 1 0 61 X 1 0 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 MPH
60 1 1 60 XX 1 1 2 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 1 59 X 0 1 1 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 2 3 57 XXXXX 2 3 5
56 1 2 56 XXX 1 2 3 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 4 3 55 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 3 5 54 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 2 1 53 XXX 2 1 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 2 2 52 XXXX 2 2 4 * STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 7 4 51 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 * EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 6 5 50 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR 49 2 3 49 XXXXX 2 3 5 P PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 4 5 48 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 A DEVELOPMENT:
47 2 4 47 XXXXXX 2 4 6 C ADT: 0
46 4 3 46 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E
45 5 3 45 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
44 5 4 44 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
43 2 3 43 XXXXX 2 3 5 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 1 0 42 X 1 0 1
41 2 1 41 XXX 2 1 3
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 54.3 54.7 54.4 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 49.3 49.8 49.6 M.P.H.
37 0 0 37 0 0 0
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 44.4 45.0 44.7 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 44 - 53 43 - 52 43 - 52 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 70% 68% 69%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 21% 30% 28%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 9% 2% 4%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 49.34 49.85 49.59 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22.56 21.71 22.00
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.75 4.66 4.69 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.41 0.20
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.64 0.45 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
56 53 109
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:48 AM TO 11:48 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED36 RV CENTER DR BETWEEN 600 E WASHINGTON ST AND 1000 E WASHINGTON ST.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED36 RV CENTER DR BETWEEN 600 E WASHINGTON ST AND 1000 E WASHINGTON ST. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 30.3 30.6 30.5 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 26.4 26.4 26.4 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 22.5 22.1 22.3 M.P.H.
35 0 1 35 X 0 1 1
34 0 1 34 X 0 1 1 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 22 - 31 21 - 30 M.P.H. 33 2 0 33 XX 2 0 2
32 1 3 32 XXXX 1 3 4 % IN PACE: 85% 80% 82%
31 2 1 31 XXX 2 1 3
30 5 2 30 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 * % OVER PACE: 15% 14% 15%
29 1 4 29 XXXXX 1 4 5 *
28 3 3 28 XXXXXX 3 3 6 * % UNDER PACE: 0% 7% 3%
27 1 4 27 XXXXX 1 4 5 P
26 4 3 26 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 A ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26.41 26.39 26.40 M.P.H. 25 4 4 25 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 C
24 2 5 24 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 E SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13.89 16.89 15.39 23 2 4 23 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
22 3 5 22 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.73 4.11 3.92 M.P.H. 21 4 1 21 XXXXX 4 1 5 *
20 0 1 20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.38 0.20
19 0 1 19 X 0 1 1
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.64 0.62 0.44 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
34 44 78
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:52 AM TO 11:45AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED37 SAN BERNARDINO AVE BETWEEN N. PEPPER AVE AND MERIDIAN AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED37 SAN BERNARDINO AVE BETWEEN N. PEPPER AVE AND MERIDIAN AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 1 0 45 X 1 0 1
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 1 0 43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 2 4 42 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
41 1 3 41 XXXX 1 3 4 *
40 3 1 40 XXXX 3 1 4 * 85TH %: 39.8 39.8 39.8 M.P.H.
39 4 6 39 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 P
38 7 4 38 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 A 50TH %: 36.8 36.2 36.5 M.P.H. 37 8 7 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 7 15 C
36 9 5 36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 E 15TH %: 33.7 32.7 33.2 M.P.H. 35 5 3 35 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
34 4 6 34 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 3 4 33 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
32 2 2 32 XXXX 2 2 4 % IN PACE: 90% 86% 87%
31 2 3 31 XXXXX 2 3 5
30 0 1 30 X 0 1 1 % OVER PACE: 10% 0% 2%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 1 28 X 0 1 1 % UNDER PACE: 0% 14% 11%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36.75 36.24 36.50 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 8.78 11.82 10.23
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 2.96 3.44 3.20 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.17 0.24 0.10
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.49 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 50 102
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:03 PM TO 12:26 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED38 SAN BERNARDINO AVE BETWEEN N. SYCAMORE AVE AND N. PEPPER AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED38 SAN BERNARDINO AVE BETWEEN N. SYCAMORE AVE AND N. PEPPER AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 1 0 48 X 1 0 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 0 47 X 1 0 1 ADT: 0
46 0 2 46 XX 0 2 2
45 2 2 45 XXXX 2 2 4
44 4 3 44 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
43 3 4 43 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 4 5 42 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
41 3 6 41 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 P
40 5 7 40 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 A 85TH %: 43.3 43.1 43.2 M.P.H. 39 7 3 39 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 C
38 6 5 38 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 E 50TH %: 39.5 39.6 39.6 M.P.H. 37 4 4 37 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 *
36 5 3 36 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * 15TH %: 35.7 36.1 35.9 M.P.H. 35 2 5 35 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 *
34 0 2 34 XX 0 2 2 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 35 - 44 35 - 44 M.P.H. 33 2 0 33 XX 2 0 2
32 0 1 32 X 0 1 1 % IN PACE: 86% 87% 86%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 1 0 30 X 1 0 1 % OVER PACE: 4% 8% 8%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 10% 6% 6%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39.52 39.62 39.57 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13.40 11.61 12.37
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.66 3.41 3.52 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.27 0.22 0.12
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.52 0.47 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 52 102
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:08 AM TO 9:30 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED39 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN W.CITY LIMITS AND N. PEPPER AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED39 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN W.CITY LIMITS AND N. PEPPER AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 1 55 X 0 1 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 1 54 X 0 1 1 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 2 0 53 XX 2 0 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 1 0 52 X 1 0 1 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 3 1 51 XXXX 3 1 4 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 2 1 50 XXX 2 1 3 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 3 2 49 XXXXX 3 2 5 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 3 48 XXX 0 3 3 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 4 3 47 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * ADT: 0
46 4 5 46 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
45 5 3 45 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 P
44 4 5 44 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 A
43 7 4 43 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 C EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 3 6 42 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 E
41 2 5 41 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 *
40 5 4 40 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * 85TH %: 48.9 48.0 48.5 M.P.H. 39 4 2 39 XXXXXX 4 2 6 *
38 0 3 38 XXX 0 3 3 50TH %: 44.3 43.4 43.8 M.P.H.
37 0 2 37 XX 0 2 2
36 2 0 36 XX 2 0 2 15TH %: 39.6 38.9 39.2 M.P.H.
35 0 1 35 X 0 1 1
34 0 1 34 X 0 1 1 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 40 - 49 39 - 48 M.P.H. 33 1 0 33 X 1 0 1
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 73% 75% 74%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 21% 8% 16%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 6% 17% 10%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 44.25 43.43 43.84 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20.39 19.44 19.89
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.52 4.41 4.46 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.37 0.19
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.61 0.44 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 53 105
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:35 AM TO 9:54 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED40 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN N. PEPPER AVE AND N. RANCHO AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED40 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN N. PEPPER AVE AND N. RANCHO AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 1 0 57 X 1 0 1
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 2 54 XX 0 2 2 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 1 52 X 0 1 1 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 2 0 51 XX 2 0 2 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 5 50 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR 49 8 4 49 XXXXXXXXXXXX 8 4 12 * PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0 48 3 5 48 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 5 6 47 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 P ADT: 0
46 7 6 46 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 A
45 4 2 45 XXXXXX 4 2 6 C
44 5 6 44 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 E
43 3 2 43 XXXXX 3 2 5 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 1 42 X 0 1 1 *
41 4 4 41 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 *
40 3 2 40 XXXXX 3 2 5 85TH %: 49.9 49.7 49.8 M.P.H.
39 0 5 39 XXXXX 0 5 5
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 45.9 45.4 45.6 M.P.H.
37 2 0 37 XX 2 0 2
36 0 1 36 X 0 1 1 15TH %: 41.9 41.1 41.5 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 41 - 50 41 - 50 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 84% 79% 82%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 6% 6% 6%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 10% 15% 13%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 45.86 45.40 45.63 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14.88 16.95 15.82
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.86 4.12 3.98 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.33 0.15
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.57 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 52 103
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:14 AM TO 9:35 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED41 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN N.RANCHO AVE AND N. MOUNT VERNON AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED41 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN N.RANCHO AVE AND N. MOUNT VERNON AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 1 0 43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 1 0 42 X 1 0 1
41 2 1 41 XXX 2 1 3
40 3 5 40 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 85TH %: 37.7 37.2 37.5 M.P.H. 39 2 4 39 XXXXXX 2 4 6
38 2 0 38 XX 2 0 2 50TH %: 32.9 31.7 32.3 M.P.H.
37 0 4 37 XXXX 0 4 4
36 4 0 36 XXXX 4 0 4 15TH %: 28.1 26.2 27.1 M.P.H.
35 4 3 35 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
34 3 2 34 XXXXX 3 2 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 25 - 34 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 3 2 33 XXXXX 3 2 5 *
32 4 2 32 XXXXXX 4 2 6 P % IN PACE: 75% 65% 65%
31 5 3 31 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 A
30 3 3 30 XXXXXX 3 3 6 C % OVER PACE: 21% 33% 28%
29 6 4 29 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 E
28 5 2 28 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 2% 7%
27 3 6 27 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 *
26 1 4 26 XXXXX 1 4 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32.92 31.73 32.34 M.P.H. 25 1 5 25 XXXXXX 1 5 6
24 0 1 24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21.65 28.32 25.04
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.65 5.32 5.00 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.56 0.24
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.64 0.75 0.49 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
53 51 104
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Thursday, March 10, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:23 AM TO 10:38 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED42 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN WEST END AND S. MT VERNON AVE .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED42 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN WEST END AND S. MT VERNON AVE . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 1 42 X 0 1 1
41 3 0 41 XXX 3 0 3
40 0 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 37.9 36.8 37.3 M.P.H.
39 3 0 39 XXX 3 0 3
38 0 2 38 XX 0 2 2 50TH %: 34.0 32.7 33.3 M.P.H.
37 7 4 37 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 *
36 6 5 36 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 * 15TH %: 30.1 28.6 29.3 M.P.H. 35 5 5 35 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
34 7 6 34 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 P 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 3 7 33 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 A
32 2 3 32 XXXXX 2 3 5 C % IN PACE: 84% 81% 82%
31 4 3 31 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E
30 1 0 30 X 1 0 1 * % OVER PACE: 12% 8% 10%
29 3 4 29 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
28 4 5 28 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 12% 8%
27 2 3 27 XXXXX 2 3 5
26 0 1 26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33.96 32.65 33.29 M.P.H. 25 0 2 25 XX 0 2 2
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14.16 15.64 15.20
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.76 3.96 3.90 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.30 0.15
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.55 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 52 102
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:34 AM TO 10:54 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED43 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN S. MT VERNON AVE AND RECHE CANYON RD .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED43 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN S. MT VERNON AVE AND RECHE CANYON RD . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 1 0 53 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 1 52 X 0 1 1 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 1 0 48 X 1 0 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 0 47 X 1 0 1 ADT: 0
46 0 4 46 XXXX 0 4 4
45 2 3 45 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
44 6 5 44 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 *
43 5 4 43 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 7 6 42 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 P
41 5 5 41 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 A
40 6 7 40 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 C 85TH %: 44.7 44.8 44.7 M.P.H. 39 5 4 39 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 E
38 4 2 38 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * 50TH %: 40.6 40.8 40.7 M.P.H. 37 5 4 37 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
36 3 2 36 XXXXX 3 2 5 * 15TH %: 36.5 36.8 36.7 M.P.H. 35 1 3 35 XXXX 1 3 4
34 1 0 34 X 1 0 1 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 37 - 46 36 - 45 M.P.H. 33 0 1 33 X 0 1 1
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 89% 85% 85%
31 0 1 31 X 0 1 1
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 6% 2% 8%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 6% 13% 8%
27 1 0 27 X 1 0 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40.59 40.79 40.69 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 15.68 14.92 15.17
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.96 3.86 3.89 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.29 0.14
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.54 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
54 52 106
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:55 AM TO 10:15 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED44 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN RECHE CANYON RD AND WATERMAN AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED44 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN RECHE CANYON RD AND WATERMAN AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 1 51 X 0 1 1 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 2 49 XX 0 2 2 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 0 48 XXX 3 0 3 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 1 0 46 X 1 0 1
45 2 1 45 XXX 2 1 3
44 3 2 44 XXXXX 3 2 5
43 0 3 43 XXX 0 3 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 4 4 42 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 *
41 5 6 41 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 *
40 6 6 40 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 * 85TH %: 43.5 43.6 43.5 M.P.H. 39 4 7 39 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 P
38 5 6 38 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 A 50TH %: 39.0 39.4 39.2 M.P.H. 37 6 4 37 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 C
36 1 3 36 XXXX 1 3 4 E 15TH %: 34.4 35.1 34.8 M.P.H.
35 3 0 35 XXX 3 0 3 *
34 2 3 34 XXXXX 2 3 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 36 - 45 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 4 3 33 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
32 1 2 32 XXX 1 2 3 % IN PACE: 77% 79% 78%
31 1 0 31 X 1 0 1
30 1 0 30 X 1 0 1 % OVER PACE: 17% 6% 17%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 6% 15% 5%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38.98 39.38 39.18 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19.12 16.66 17.75
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.37 4.08 4.21 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.31 0.17
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.61 0.56 0.41 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 53 105
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

Appendix C: Radar Certifications

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) -
R F

TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION -
Inc.

TES1'ED 1'0 NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS/ IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration. Radar Repair (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police. ~ .
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.

Westminster, Calif. 92683
1 TEST ID Date ~:iz~ -I 1
Certification N~.t/ / y -z...

Make • Type (1-IV) Directional radar Same direction Model Decatur Genesis VP or VPD III
~
□ No o Yes ;a"'No 2 DEVICE ID
.AJ 1 es
CountiZ. unit SIN Antenna-I SIN NIA Antenna-2 SIN NIA rJ S'S-7 - § 2.4 / § 5.4 L21;~47or; pr Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) Sp1..f1 ph) M~~~z) r ...,_ 3 TUNING FORK PASS, FAIL
H1 hlz.d $~~ Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) Spe~Cr, h) N1e? ed1Hz) ..... ~ CALIBRATION \ "<J 6
. . .. . - ' . . ., . . "· . Lo fork Hi!!h fork . . - . ' . . . ' / . .

J
Fork speed (mph) . 33 77 . ~ Stationary mode ,
• § 2.5 I§ 5.5 ' Disp. Speed (mph) 3'3 77 RADA.R DEVICE @ 4 Expected. Displayed. FAIL TUNING FORK Moving mode TARGET SPEED (mph) (mph) NIA TESTS Opposite Direction (Hi fork - Lo fork) Moving mode TAR GET SPEED Expected. Displayed.

Hi fork + Lo fork (mph) (mph) NIA Same Direction Hi fork - Lo fork Standard supply Antenna 1
Z'/'-!2G
Antenna2
§ 2.6.1. / § 5.6.1 Voltae:e (V) 7.2 V Frea. GHz Frea. GHz NIA . 5 TRANSMISSION Standard supply Antenna l Antenna2 r I FAIL FREQUENCY Voltage - 20% (V) 6.2 V Frec1. GHz N/4 Freo. GHz NIA iy AS~ STABILITY Standard supply Antenna 1 Antenna2
voltae:e + 20% (V) 8.6 V Frea. GHz IV/A Frea. GHz NIA
§ 2.6.5 I§ 5.6.5 Mfg. Spec. Antenna 1
~
Antenna2
~/J
r
6 I PAS FAIL POWER DENSITY (max mW/cm) < 2 Power (mW/cm) Power (mW/cm) N/A Mfg. spec. L VA activates L VA deactivates '
7 § 2.8 / § 5.8
N/A N/'1 PASS FAIL LOW VOLTAGE (V) < 6.2 V (V) (V) co
§ 2.9.l / § 5.9.1 A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal ~ Yes □ No ~:PAS~ ;'" .
8 F4IL DOPPLER AUDIO B. Functioning audio volume-adjustment control .a"Yes □ No . § 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4 Mfg. Spec. Test results
@_p
.
• 9 INTERNAL PASS /JA.s.J FAIL

CIRCUIT '
§2.12.6.5/§ A. Selects only targets moving towards radar .r{ es □ No □ N.A. ~ - '
10 5.12.6.5 B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ..wYes □ No D N.A.· PASS I FAIL "'" ~

DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode: Low speed spec. 5 Lo speed disp. s-
target channel (mph) Hi speed spec. 200 Hi speed disp. 2 01:1 § 2.12.7 I§ 2.12.8 /
NIA NIA 5.12.7 / 5.12.8 Moving Mode Low speed spec. Lo speed disp.

GA~ 11 LOW AND HIGH target channel (mph) FAIL
SPEED DISPLAY Hi speed spec. NIA Hi speed <lisp. NIA
TEST .

NIA
-
NIA-
.

Low speed spec. Lo speed <lisp. - -Moving Mode:
patrol channel (mph) Hi speed spec. NIA Hi speed disp. NIA a. ' '
. - .. - -- . .. - '
§2.13/§5.13
' (Jr •
12 ...._PAS-~) FAIL RFI TEST .
- -- "· · .
13 LABORATORY

COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 ,...Jd"t?ASS □ FAIL 14 NHTSA/IACP

CERTIFICATIO'N
--Certified by: z /~
Date: J'-ZC/_- /1 • ----1 I - ,. '
o Fork Cert I o Manual D 2nd Ant. • D Remote o Bat.
. . '
15 INVENTORY .
o Cru 1 vine: Case o Other: (olease list)
.
> • .
'
.
. ..

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) (((R!!F

TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
Inc. TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIF ICATlONS / IACP CRITICAL PERFORMAN CE STANDARDS (NHTSA) 1tioul Highwa y and Traffic Safety Admini stration. (lACP) luternation•I Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independ ent testing and repair facility.

Westminster, Calif. 92683
I TEST ID Date: Received ~-/ R- / 1 Certification Number/~? t? / Make Model I Type(l-lV) Directional radar I Same direction 2 DEVICE ID De<:atur Genesis VP or VPD lJl v'Yes □ No □ Yes lil"'No Counting unit? S" Antenna-I SIN NIA Anteona-2 SIN NIA r,-7 - q § 2.4 I§ 5.4 Low speed fork SIN Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) Speed (mph) Measured (Hz) 3 TUNING FORK
~o'7dJoU/N Last da1e calib. Freq. (Hz) s~~m ph) Meas_r~~ @ FAIL

CALIBRATION
Lo fork Hi,:!.h fork
Fork speed (mph) JJ 77
Stationary mode
§ 2.5 I§ 5.5 Disp. Speed (mph) 3] 77 @ 4 RADAR DEVICE Expected. Displayed. FAIL TUNING FORK Moving mode TAR GET SPEED TESTS Opposite Direction (Hi fork- Lo fork) (mph) (mph) NIA Moving mode TARGET SPEED Expected. Displayed.

Hi fork + Lo fork (mph) (mph) NIA Same Direction Hi fork - Lo fork Standard supply Antenna I
z <./. /.5'7-
Antenna2
§ 2,6.l. I§ 5.6.1 Voltage (V) 7.2 V Freq. GHz Freq. GHz NIA 5 TRANSMISSION Standard supply Antenna I
NJ/J
Antenna2
(§; FAJL FREQUENCY Voltage- 20% (V) 6.2 V Freq. GHz Freq. GHz NIA STABlLITY Standard supply Antenna I
N IA
Antenna 2
vollal!e + 20% (V) 8.6 V Freq. GHz Frea. GHz NIA
§ 2.6.5 I § 5.6.5 Mfg. Spec. Antenna I Antenna2
@ FAIL 6 POWER DENSITY (maxmW lcm) :S 2 Power (mW/cm) , .J e./ Power (mW/cm) N/A 7 § 2.81 § 5.8 Mfg. spec. L VA activates
N/4
L VA deactivates
N/4 PASS FAfL LOW VOLTAGE (V) < 6.2 V (V) (V)
8 § 2.9.1 I§ 5.9.1 A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal f!l'Yes □ No ~ FAIL DOPPLER AUDIO B. Functioning audio volume-adiustment control flf'Yes □ No § 2.12.41 § 5.12.4 Mfg. Spec. I Test results
/J,4Sf @ 9 INTERNAL PASS FAJL

CIRCUIT
§ 2.12.6.5 I§ A Selects only targets moving towards radar -WYes □ No □ N.A. (§) 10 5.12.6.5 B. Selects only targets moving away from radar .vYes □ No □ N.A FAIL DfRECTlONAL
Stationary mode: Low speed spec. s Lo speed disp. s-
target channel (mph) Hi speed spec. 200 Hi speed disp. ZOt/ § 2.12.7 / § 2.12.8 I
NIA NIA 5.12.7 /5. 12.8 Moving Mode Low speed spec. Lo speed disp. e
11 LOW AND HIGH target channel (mph) FAJL
SPEED DISPLAY Hi speed spec. NIA Hi speed disp. NIA
TEST
NIA NIA Moving Mode: Low speed spec. Lo speed disp.
patrol channel (mph) Hi speed spec. NIA Hi speed disp. NIA 12 §2.13 /§5.13 (PAss) FAIL RFI TEST
13 LABORATORY

COMMENTS
TJ,is radar device meets or exceeds tl,e mittimal operational sta11dards of the Natio11a/ Traffic Highway Safety Admillistra tion. California Ve/ride Code Section 40801 ,,d PASS D FAIL 14 NHTSA/IACP

CERTIFICATION
Certified by: -1,. 7-?~
Date: 6-lcf -/9 I
o Fork Cert . o Manual □ 2""Ant. □ Remote a BaL
I 15 fNVENTORY o Carrvine. Case □ Other: (olease list)

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) R F

IRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
Inc.

TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS/ IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Admini5~&tion. ' . .

Radar Repair (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police . • .
16202 Keats Circle . R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility .

Westminster, Calif. 92683
1 TEST ID Date R~ eived ·J c: . -7"1-- t
Certification Number
/ YS-L/8'
Make Model Type (I-IV) Directional radar Same direction . 2 DEVICE ID Decatur Genesis VP or VPD Ill ,#!!"Yes □ No □ Yes r7·No Cou~z:nit SIN Antenna-I SIN NIA Antenna-2 S/N NIA
<=' "'--
§ 2.4 / § 5.4 ~'t speed f<;>~ SIN Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) Sp~ dt ph) Measured (Hzt, .;., 7 7. . 7 7<~ @ 3 TUNING FORK FAIL High speed fork SIN Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) Speed (mph) - .

CALIBRATION Measured (Hz)
--, ~
- - ~- .. ·<
. ~: . ' ·:-·-. ~· .. :. ~ . Lo fork Hig-h fork
Fork speed (mph) 33 77
•
Stationary mode
§ 2.5 I§ 5.5 Disp. Speed (mph) "33' 71
9 4 RADAR DEVICE Expected. Displayed. FAIL TUNING FORK Moving mode TARGET SPEED (mph) (mph) NIA TESTS Opposite Direction (Hi fork - Lo fork) Moving mode TARGET SPEED Expected. Displayed.

I-Ii fork + Lo fork (mph) (mph) NIA Same Direction Hi fork - Lo fork Standard supply Antenna 1
Zc/. 13 I
Antenna2
§ 2.6.1. / § 5.6.1 Volta11e (V) 7.2 V Frea. GHz Frea. GHz NIA 5 TRANSMISSION Standard supply Antenna 1
NILJ
Antenna2
9 FAIL FREQUENCY Volta!!e - 20% (V) 6.2 V Freo. GHz Frea. GHz NIA STABILITY Standard supply Antenna I
AJ/,4
Antenna2
voltag-e + 20% (V) 8.6 V Frea. GHz Frea. GHz NIA
§ 2.6.5 I§ 5.6.5 Mfg. Spec. Antenna 1 Antenna2 @ 6 · It FAIL POWER DENSITY (max mW/cm) < 2 Power (mW/cm) Power (mW/cm) N/A 7 § 2.8 / § 5.8 Mfg. spec. L VA activates
N)A
L VA deactivates
N/A PASS FAIL LOW VOLTAGE (V) < 6.2 V (V) (V) d
8 § 2.9.1 I§ 5.9.I A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal ,l,!f"Y°es □ No <§) FAIL DOPPLER AUDIO B. Functioning audio volume-adiustment control J;lf'Yes □ No •
§ 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4 Mfg. Spec. Test results ., :..
9 INTERNAL PASS p,4.r.r
! PASS I FAIL ~ ~

CIRCUIT
§ 2.12.6.5 I§ A. Selects only targets moving towards radar .R!"'{es □ No □ N.A / .. 10 5.12.6.5 B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ;;;,,Yes □ No □ N.A. !'"-PAS~ FAIL

DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode: Low speed spec. 5 Lo speed <lisp. s-
target channel (mph) Hi speed spec. 200 Hi speed <lisp. Zt:Jt) ✓ - § 2.12. 7 I § 2.12.8 I
NIA NIA 5.12.7 I 5.12.8 Lo"v speed spec. Lo speed disp. Moving Mode / .. 11 LOW AND HIGH 1-.,._PASS ... t FAIL target channel (mph) NIA NIA SPEED DISPLAY Hi speed spec. Hi speed <lisp.

TEST .

NIA
j
NIA -
Moving Mode: Low speed spec. Lo speed disp.
patrol channel (mph) Hi speed spec. NIA Hi speed disp. NIA . , . . . ;-: ~L ---.:,----,- . ' ' - ._;:
§ 2.13 / § 5.13 Q>AS~) 12 FAIL RFI TEST •
" '
. . :e . . ..
13 LABORATORY

COMMENTS
This radar device meets or ex,ceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 J21>ASS □ FAIL 14 NHTSNIACP

CERTIFICATION
-
Certified by: - y Date:
<f'-29-/9 & -'/. - -~ A ... ·• ~-•
o Fork Cert .. o Manual 0 2nd Ant.
'
o Remote o Bat. . . '
15 fNVENTORY ...
o C;i1Tving Case o Other: (nlease list)
.
> •
'
•
. •

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) 1/10/2017 AIM TD 1.jpg
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/155284369b9a8d13?projector=1 1/1 -
,§::::~~~ -- ~::::-~ ..-r-~
§~VQ'~ , , . '~),wJ.a~~:~

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT-

1. Manuel E. Sanchez of AimTD LLC has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration , California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

2. Manuel E. Sanchez completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

3. Manuel E. Sanchez, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of a radar device, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

4. Manuel E. Sanchez demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

5. Manuel E. Sanchez of AimTD LLC is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 3rd day of January, 2017.
~
Stev~
P.O.S.T. Certified Radar Instructor
-~~ . . ,. . ,. ..
-

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT -

1. Mark Polunin of AimTD LLC has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

2. Mark Polunin completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

3. Mark Polunin, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of a radar device, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

4. Mark Polunin demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

5. Mark Polunin AimTD LLC is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 1st day of July, 2019.

Steve Chauncey
P.O.S.T. Certified Radar Instructor

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT -

1. Olga Polunin of AimTD LLC has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This ~~K:~~,11 course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Mt'1,l(NJD.6a~a\\ Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the Califomia Vehicle Code.

2. Olga Polunin completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

3. Olga Polunin, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of a radar device, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

4. Olga Polunin demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings .

5. Olga Poh,min of AimTD LLC is recognized for her competence as a Radar Operator this 20th day of June, 2016.

Steve C auncey
P.O.S.T. Certified Radar Instructor

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study)

Appendix D: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 11 18 12:00 59 55
0:15 14 25 12:15 51 55
0:30 6 19 12:30 52 75
0:45 5 36 8 70 106 12:45 69 231 57 242 473
1:00 4 20 13:00 51 50
1:15 7 22 13:15 45 82
1:30 6 13 13:30 60 128
1:45 15 32 12 67 99 13:45 56 212 88 348 560
2:00 14 9 14:00 60 89
2:15 17 10 14:15 52 81
2:30 12 6 14:30 63 123
2:45 16 59 14 39 98 14:45 87 262 130 423 685
3:00 14 12 15:00 63 128
3:15 15 4 15:15 81 139
3:30 24 4 15:30 96 230
3:45 41 94 2 22 116 15:45 91 331 144 641 972
4:00 29 23 16:00 60 148
4:15 21 13 16:15 49 117
4:30 19 12 16:30 51 136
4:45 23 92 13 61 153 16:45 48 208 120 521 729
5:00 43 20 17:00 44 113
5:15 46 20 17:15 56 102
5:30 62 24 17:30 58 104
5:45 89 240 35 99 339 17:45 54 212 121 440 652
6:00 70 27 18:00 37 70
6:15 52 50 18:15 33 64
6:30 92 66 18:30 20 52
6:45 94 308 112 255 563 18:45 22 112 45 231 343
7:00 53 163 19:00 23 45
7:15 68 149 19:15 25 34
7:30 90 99 19:30 16 39
7:45 90 301 79 490 791 19:45 23 87 34 152 239
8:00 76 116 20:00 14 21
8:15 60 68 20:15 13 24
8:30 67 52 20:30 11 25
8:45 47 250 63 299 549 20:45 12 50 20 90 140
9:00 52 30 21:00 5 13
9:15 45 49 21:15 11 9
9:30 45 54 21:30 13 14
9:45 55 197 45 178 375 21:45 13 42 18 54 96
10:00 36 46 22:00 13 28
10:15 53 47 22:15 8 10
10:30 38 46 22:30 9 13
10:45 38 165 52 191 356 22:45 7 37 13 64 101
11:00 37 48 23:00 6 18
11:15 31 51 23:15 7 25
11:30 53 31 23:30 8 24
11:45 50 171 58 188 359 23:45 7 28 13 80 108
Total Vol. 1945 1959 3904 1812 3286 5098
EB WB Combined
3757 5245 9002
Split % 49.8% 50.2% 43.4% 35.5% 64.5% 56.6%
Peak Hour 7:15 6:45 6:45 15:00 15:15 15:15
Volume 324 523 828 331 661 989
P.H.F. 0.90 0.80 0.95 0.86 0.72 0.76
Daily Totals
AM PM
Wednesday, February 23, 2022
ADT1 Agua Mansa Rd between S Riverside Ave and S Rancho Ave AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 11 5 12:00 119 91
0:15 4 3 12:15 156 101
0:30 2 5 12:30 145 130
0:45 3 20 4 17 37 12:45 138 558 76 398 956
1:00 2 6 13:00 126 114
1:15 6 10 13:15 122 101
1:30 2 3 13:30 103 135
1:45 2 12 0 19 31 13:45 126 477 120 470 947
2:00 5 1 14:00 138 100
2:15 1 3 14:15 149 118
2:30 2 3 14:30 140 177
2:45 4 12 7 14 26 14:45 138 565 191 586 1151
3:00 3 0 15:00 137 154
3:15 5 5 15:15 141 163
3:30 10 5 15:30 160 157
3:45 2 20 5 15 35 15:45 208 646 181 655 1301
4:00 6 3 16:00 192 180
4:15 4 21 16:15 174 189
4:30 6 49 16:30 189 171
4:45 17 33 73 146 179 16:45 172 727 165 705 1432
5:00 12 77 17:00 176 130
5:15 18 93 17:15 209 144
5:30 15 165 17:30 181 162
5:45 23 68 194 529 597 17:45 170 736 127 563 1299
6:00 24 218 18:00 139 118
6:15 38 246 18:15 120 133
6:30 68 252 18:30 93 120
6:45 122 252 297 1013 1265 18:45 73 425 86 457 882
7:00 152 330 19:00 77 69
7:15 144 289 19:15 59 53
7:30 135 328 19:30 62 45
7:45 166 597 311 1258 1855 19:45 70 268 48 215 483
8:00 132 304 20:00 44 33
8:15 81 217 20:15 38 31
8:30 88 137 20:30 45 31
8:45 91 392 137 795 1187 20:45 33 160 24 119 279
9:00 71 74 21:00 17 40
9:15 76 99 21:15 26 30
9:30 68 98 21:30 24 19
9:45 72 287 67 338 625 21:45 24 91 22 111 202
10:00 63 66 22:00 13 23
10:15 80 77 22:15 19 21
10:30 68 85 22:30 25 13
10:45 68 279 76 304 583 22:45 19 76 21 78 154
11:00 108 90 23:00 11 13
11:15 82 94 23:15 8 13
11:30 102 84 23:30 12 7
11:45 101 393 107 375 768 23:45 7 38 7 40 78
Total Vol. 2365 4823 7188 4767 4397 9164
EB WB Combined
7132 9220 16352
Split % 32.9% 67.1% 44.0% 52.0% 48.0% 56.0%
Peak Hour 7:00 7:00 7:00 15:45 15:45 15:45
Volume 597 1258 1855 763 721 1484
P.H.F. 0.90 0.95 0.96 0.92 0.95 0.95
Wednesday, February 23, 2022
ADT2 Barton Rd betw een Hilltop Dr and W ashington St AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected] Daily Totals
AM PM

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 15 9 12:00 65 81
0:15 3 4 12:15 96 69
0:30 9 6 12:30 96 64
0:45 2 29 2 21 50 12:45 80 337 74 288 625
1:00 4 4 13:00 69 68
1:15 11 4 13:15 73 64
1:30 6 3 13:30 80 57
1:45 3 24 2 13 37 13:45 66 288 55 244 532
2:00 3 7 14:00 91 65
2:15 3 0 14:15 76 65
2:30 8 2 14:30 82 72
2:45 3 17 3 12 29 14:45 75 324 82 284 608
3:00 6 3 15:00 114 77
3:15 4 1 15:15 60 81
3:30 6 4 15:30 91 84
3:45 5 21 5 13 34 15:45 73 338 100 342 680
4:00 11 5 16:00 111 81
4:15 17 7 16:15 77 107
4:30 41 7 16:30 88 97
4:45 67 136 9 28 164 16:45 66 342 95 380 722
5:00 87 14 17:00 89 92
5:15 104 12 17:15 94 107
5:30 140 14 17:30 79 83
5:45 135 466 29 69 535 17:45 96 358 79 361 719
6:00 103 39 18:00 85 78
6:15 119 53 18:15 69 73
6:30 121 70 18:30 53 57
6:45 145 488 74 236 724 18:45 38 245 53 261 506
7:00 118 139 19:00 45 45
7:15 158 176 19:15 32 29
7:30 124 93 19:30 35 26
7:45 156 556 113 521 1077 19:45 26 138 19 119 257
8:00 99 102 20:00 18 16
8:15 71 73 20:15 34 25
8:30 66 64 20:30 28 33
8:45 48 284 45 284 568 20:45 35 115 12 86 201
9:00 42 31 21:00 21 25
9:15 34 33 21:15 21 14
9:30 38 28 21:30 18 16
9:45 48 162 41 133 295 21:45 9 69 11 66 135
10:00 43 45 22:00 11 11
10:15 47 47 22:15 12 9
10:30 43 49 22:30 16 15
10:45 48 181 53 194 375 22:45 13 52 10 45 97
11:00 53 67 23:00 9 5
11:15 64 49 23:15 10 7
11:30 57 62 23:30 5 11
11:45 69 243 69 247 490 23:45 8 32 4 27 59
Total Vol. 2607 1771 4378 2638 2503 5141
EB WB Combined
5245 4274 9519
Split % 59.5% 40.5% 46.0% 51.3% 48.7% 54.0%
Peak Hour 7:00 7:00 7:00 17:00 16:15 15:45
Volume 556 521 1077 358 391 734
P.H.F. 0.88 0.74 0.81 0.93 0.91 0.96
Wednesday, February 23, 2022
ADT3 Barton Rd between S La Cadena Dr and E City Limits UPRR AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected] Daily Totals
AM PM

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 2 1 12:00 26 32
0:15 0 0 12:15 33 39
0:30 4 2 12:30 35 35
0:45 2 8 0 3 11 12:45 32 126 31 137 263
1:00 3 1 13:00 28 40
1:15 2 0 13:15 39 55
1:30 0 1 13:30 38 44
1:45 2 7 1 3 10 13:45 28 133 53 192 325
2:00 1 2 14:00 44 62
2:15 0 4 14:15 48 92
2:30 2 3 14:30 87 72
2:45 3 6 4 13 19 14:45 51 230 57 283 513
3:00 1 1 15:00 48 62
3:15 2 0 15:15 39 57
3:30 0 6 15:30 38 56
3:45 2 5 3 10 15 15:45 60 185 58 233 418
4:00 3 2 16:00 69 71
4:15 2 4 16:15 46 53
4:30 7 1 16:30 58 62
4:45 9 21 9 16 37 16:45 51 224 56 242 466
5:00 7 10 17:00 50 63
5:15 7 9 17:15 43 71
5:30 7 14 17:30 61 54
5:45 8 29 10 43 72 17:45 45 199 61 249 448
6:00 5 9 18:00 39 45
6:15 12 11 18:15 29 29
6:30 20 13 18:30 18 29
6:45 38 75 20 53 128 18:45 23 109 26 129 238
7:00 66 55 19:00 22 30
7:15 82 58 19:15 24 22
7:30 49 61 19:30 18 18
7:45 56 253 56 230 483 19:45 16 80 26 96 176
8:00 38 30 20:00 15 23
8:15 33 28 20:15 14 19
8:30 25 39 20:30 10 13
8:45 22 118 35 132 250 20:45 5 44 12 67 111
9:00 34 27 21:00 13 9
9:15 28 22 21:15 9 11
9:30 28 18 21:30 8 12
9:45 35 125 24 91 216 21:45 12 42 7 39 81
10:00 36 31 22:00 10 9
10:15 45 35 22:15 5 5
10:30 25 32 22:30 6 7
10:45 32 138 34 132 270 22:45 7 28 11 32 60
11:00 27 35 23:00 5 3
11:15 33 33 23:15 2 1
11:30 43 35 23:30 3 1
11:45 34 137 50 153 290 23:45 4 14 4 9 23
Total Vol. 922 879 1801 1414 1708 3122
EB WB Combined
2336 2587 4923
Split % 51.2% 48.8% 36.6% 45.3% 54.7% 63.4%
Peak Hour 7:00 7:00 7:00 14:15 14:00 14:15
Volume 253 230 483 234 283 517
P.H.F. 0.77 0.94 0.86 0.67 0.77 0.81
Tuesday, February 22, 2022
ADT4 C St betw een N Rancho Ave and Colton Ave AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected] Daily Totals
AM PM

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 5 4 12:00 52 73
0:15 2 5 12:15 49 50
0:30 7 5 12:30 65 58
0:45 4 18 6 20 38 12:45 59 225 73 254 479
1:00 5 6 13:00 62 63
1:15 8 7 13:15 75 58
1:30 6 5 13:30 71 72
1:45 2 21 4 22 43 13:45 56 264 63 256 520
2:00 7 6 14:00 64 95
2:15 4 5 14:15 61 74
2:30 2 3 14:30 101 82
2:45 4 17 8 22 39 14:45 93 319 83 334 653
3:00 4 1 15:00 97 70
3:15 4 9 15:15 107 90
3:30 7 7 15:30 75 81
3:45 9 24 9 26 50 15:45 90 369 86 327 696
4:00 2 19 16:00 95 94
4:15 6 10 16:15 104 65
4:30 10 23 16:30 99 83
4:45 6 24 14 66 90 16:45 85 383 77 319 702
5:00 8 13 17:00 107 87
5:15 15 16 17:15 88 80
5:30 19 19 17:30 92 72
5:45 12 54 20 68 122 17:45 77 364 85 324 688
6:00 13 30 18:00 84 64
6:15 16 29 18:15 69 45
6:30 17 19 18:30 55 50
6:45 16 62 43 121 183 18:45 38 246 41 200 446
7:00 37 73 19:00 50 46
7:15 82 60 19:15 42 51
7:30 61 93 19:30 33 40
7:45 64 244 81 307 551 19:45 33 158 33 170 328
8:00 36 61 20:00 36 37
8:15 39 52 20:15 31 31
8:30 39 47 20:30 23 25
8:45 32 146 51 211 357 20:45 19 109 22 115 224
9:00 35 45 21:00 22 24
9:15 39 53 21:15 21 19
9:30 41 46 21:30 15 20
9:45 54 169 42 186 355 21:45 12 70 10 73 143
10:00 37 56 22:00 12 20
10:15 50 44 22:15 17 12
10:30 50 57 22:30 9 13
10:45 49 186 52 209 395 22:45 12 50 6 51 101
11:00 56 54 23:00 7 6
11:15 52 56 23:15 4 5
11:30 65 48 23:30 11 3
11:45 52 225 57 215 440 23:45 4 26 5 19 45
Total Vol. 1190 1473 2663 2583 2442 5025
EB WB Combined
3773 3915 7688
Split % 44.7% 55.3% 34.6% 51.4% 48.6% 65.4%
Peak Hour 7:00 7:00 7:00 14:30 15:15 14:30
Volume 244 307 551 398 351 723
P.H.F. 0.74 0.83 0.89 0.93 0.93 0.92
Daily Totals
AM PM
Tuesday, February 22, 2022
ADT5 Colton Ave between North City Limit and E St AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 13 1 12:00 32 34
0:15 5 3 12:15 29 28
0:30 7 5 12:30 25 36
0:45 7 32 3 12 44 12:45 37 123 37 135 258
1:00 5 3 13:00 40 38
1:15 4 5 13:15 57 27
1:30 5 7 13:30 43 43
1:45 8 22 3 18 40 13:45 56 196 45 153 349
2:00 4 2 14:00 51 44
2:15 5 8 14:15 64 38
2:30 6 5 14:30 68 64
2:45 5 20 8 23 43 14:45 67 250 44 190 440
3:00 2 6 15:00 79 38
3:15 6 9 15:15 45 42
3:30 8 12 15:30 73 36
3:45 8 24 13 40 64 15:45 61 258 35 151 409
4:00 12 4 16:00 73 26
4:15 13 11 16:15 50 40
4:30 15 23 16:30 66 31
4:45 9 49 35 73 122 16:45 76 265 32 129 394
5:00 10 27 17:00 74 29
5:15 21 40 17:15 81 32
5:30 27 30 17:30 61 41
5:45 39 97 47 144 241 17:45 60 276 29 131 407
6:00 29 33 18:00 52 19
6:15 16 32 18:15 38 19
6:30 19 43 18:30 39 29
6:45 33 97 46 154 251 18:45 18 147 19 86 233
7:00 31 45 19:00 22 22
7:15 23 27 19:15 37 18
7:30 26 31 19:30 24 16
7:45 37 117 43 146 263 19:45 27 110 12 68 178
8:00 36 34 20:00 20 11
8:15 35 31 20:15 18 15
8:30 35 37 20:30 19 15
8:45 38 144 29 131 275 20:45 16 73 10 51 124
9:00 38 27 21:00 11 14
9:15 30 33 21:15 8 12
9:30 31 29 21:30 11 15
9:45 24 123 43 132 255 21:45 13 43 8 49 92
10:00 25 21 22:00 7 3
10:15 27 40 22:15 6 7
10:30 36 36 22:30 9 5
10:45 32 120 42 139 259 22:45 10 32 10 25 57
11:00 28 39 23:00 5 3
11:15 34 30 23:15 11 7
11:30 39 31 23:30 7 5
11:45 43 144 26 126 270 23:45 11 34 7 22 56
Total Vol. 989 1138 2127 1807 1190 2997
EB WB Combined
2796 2328 5124
Split % 46.5% 53.5% 41.5% 60.3% 39.7% 58.5%
Peak Hour 11:15 6:15 7:45 16:30 13:45 14:15
Volume 148 166 288 297 191 462
P.H.F. 0.86 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.75 0.88
Daily Totals
AM PM
Thursday, February 24, 2022
ADT6 Center St between Riverside Ave - Main St and City Limits AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 4 2 12:00 47 75
0:15 3 3 12:15 64 51
0:30 3 2 12:30 56 70
0:45 1 11 2 9 20 12:45 48 215 66 262 477
1:00 2 4 13:00 46 89
1:15 2 7 13:15 54 80
1:30 2 2 13:30 37 85
1:45 1 7 2 15 22 13:45 58 195 73 327 522
2:00 1 2 14:00 45 80
2:15 1 3 14:15 74 98
2:30 0 3 14:30 64 89
2:45 0 2 3 11 13 14:45 59 242 99 366 608
3:00 2 3 15:00 87 123
3:15 2 1 15:15 131 123
3:30 2 3 15:30 141 139
3:45 4 10 4 11 21 15:45 151 510 138 523 1033
4:00 2 4 16:00 129 158
4:15 3 10 16:15 122 175
4:30 8 1 16:30 110 200
4:45 7 20 4 19 39 16:45 134 495 190 723 1218
5:00 4 9 17:00 94 175
5:15 6 12 17:15 98 174
5:30 13 9 17:30 103 207
5:45 16 39 13 43 82 17:45 109 404 157 713 1117
6:00 14 22 18:00 108 103
6:15 16 14 18:15 63 85
6:30 16 27 18:30 79 75
6:45 42 88 33 96 184 18:45 67 317 54 317 634
7:00 33 41 19:00 62 52
7:15 43 57 19:15 48 44
7:30 68 61 19:30 37 37
7:45 92 236 64 223 459 19:45 49 196 31 164 360
8:00 88 54 20:00 43 43
8:15 78 48 20:15 28 20
8:30 62 55 20:30 29 36
8:45 50 278 51 208 486 20:45 38 138 26 125 263
9:00 43 50 21:00 28 25
9:15 52 40 21:15 28 29
9:30 40 58 21:30 22 18
9:45 40 175 59 207 382 21:45 22 100 23 95 195
10:00 23 45 22:00 30 19
10:15 42 46 22:15 17 9
10:30 39 38 22:30 23 13
10:45 25 129 53 182 311 22:45 14 84 11 52 136
11:00 49 50 23:00 10 10
11:15 50 49 23:15 9 7
11:30 36 54 23:30 10 11
11:45 59 194 60 213 407 23:45 20 49 10 38 87
Total Vol. 1189 1237 2426 2945 3705 6650
NB SB Combined
4134 4942 9076
Split % 49.0% 51.0% 26.7% 44.3% 55.7% 73.3%
Peak Hour 7:30 11:45 7:30 15:15 16:45 16:00
Volume 326 256 553 552 746 1218
P.H.F. 0.89 0.85 0.89 0.91 0.90 0.94
Daily Totals
AM PM
Tuesday, February 15, 2022
ADT7 Cooley Dr betw een Cooley Ln and W ashington St AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

1.3.a
Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3922 : Approve Speed Study) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 6 1 12:00 63 52
0:15 3 4 12:15 54 50
0:30 6 2 12:30 63 49
0:45 1 16 2 9 25 12:45 59 239 47 198 437
1:00 4 3 13:00 70 48
1:15 3 0 13:15 56 41
1:30 4 3 13:30 49 49
1:45 4 15 1 7 22 13:45 72 247 46 184 431
2:00 1 0 14:00 64 57
2:15 1 1 14:15 91 47
2:30 3 2 14:30 89 50
2:45 3 8 2 5 13 14:45 67 311 61 215 526
3:00 2 4 15:00 90 70
3:15 2 7 15:15 93 104
3:30 1 3 15:30 101 117
3:45 2 7 7 21 28 15:45 103 387 123 414 801
4:00 0 4 16:00 97 101
4:15 3 4 16:15 111 79
4:30 3 10 16:30 133 121
4:45 3 9 4 22 31 16:45 125 466 70 371 837
5:00 10 4 17:00 150 69
5:15 9 8 17:15 127 72
5:30 11 8 17:30 136 85
5:45 10 40 23 43 83 17:45 116 529 72 298 827
6:00 16 14 18:00 110 72
6:15 15 14 18:15 60 44
6:30 26 23 18:30 54 38
6:45 36 93 38 89 182 18:45 39 263 46 200 463
7:00 21 41 19:00 43 46
7:15 46 35 19:15 32 33
7:30 50 56 19:30 38 24
7:45 52 169 70 202 371 19:45 23 136 30 133 269
8:00 39 68 20:00 40 31
8:15 28 57 20:15 21 17
8:30 33 33 20:30 24 9
8:45 35 135 33 191 326 20:45 22 107 21 78 185
9:00 27 46 21:00 18 22
9:15 29 42 21:15 12 10
9:30 37 35 21:30 14 16
9:45 45 138 37 160 298 21:45 18 62 15 63 125
10:00 41 33 22:00 16 15
10:15 41 44 22:15 6 10
10:30 44 40 22:30 11 13
10:45 35 161 39 156 317 22:45 12 45 15 53 98
11:00 43 41 23:00 11 7
11:15 43 53 23:15 7 7
11:30 47 44 23:30 8 14
11:45 54 187 57 195 382 23:45 7 33 25 53 86
Total Vol. 978 1100 2078 2825 2260 5085
EB WB Combined
3803 3360 7163
Split % 47.1% 52.9% 29.0% 55.6% 44.4% 71.0%
Peak Hour 11:45 7:30 11:45 16:45 15:15 15:45
Volume 234 251 442 538 445 868
P.H.F. 0.93 0.90 0.96 0.90 0.90 0.85
Daily Totals
AM PM
Tuesday, February 15, 2022
ADT8 Cooley Dr betw een Mt Vernon and Cooley Ln AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]