Colton City Council
February 21, 2023

grant program provides funding to local jurisdictions to assist with the implementation of regulation requirements associated with SB 1383, including but not limited to:
 Capacity Planning
 Collection
 Edible Food Recovery
 Education and outreach (includes organic waste & edible food recovery)  Enforcement and Inspection
 Program Evaluation/Gap Analysis
 Procurement Requirements
 Record Keeping

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

The City of Colton applied for funding to assist with education and outreach campaign, and collection on edible food recovery to the community to meet the SB1383 requirements . All materials to educate our comm unity on food waste recovery will be translated in English and Spanish, and provided to residents by mail, bill inserts, social media, website, and channel 3.

FISCAL IMPACTS

It is necessary to amend the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget to increase appropriations by $77,411 in Miscellaneous Grant Fund Refuse Activity Expenditure Account 225-6020-1325-2306-0000-000 and increase revenue in account number 225-5889-000 by $77,411.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT

1. R-14-23
9 Packet Pg. 451

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10

11 12

13 14

15 16

17 18

19 20

21 22

23 24

25 26

27 28

RESOLUTION NO. R-14-23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA

AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT AWARD FROM CALRECYCLE AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 202 2-23 BUDGET INCREASING REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS BY $77,411 AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL GRANT DOCUMENTS

WHEREAS, In September 2016, Governor Edmund Brown Jr. set methane emissions reduction targets for California (SB 1383 Lara, Chapter 395, Statutes of 2016) in a statewide effort to reduce emissions of short -lived climate pollutants (SLCP). The targets must reduce organic waste disposal by 50 percent by 2020 and 75 percent by 2025 and people to eat at least 20 percent of currently disposed surplus food by 2025; and,

WHEREAS, The Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) is administering a one -time grant program meant to provide aid in the implementation of regulations adopted by CalRecycle pursuant to Chapter 395, Statutes of 2016 and SB170 Budget Act of 2021. This non-competitive grant program provides funding to local jurisdictions to assist with the implementation of regulation requirements associated with SB 1383; and,

WHEREAS, The City of Colton applied for funding to assist with education and outreach campaign and collection on edible food recovery to the community to meet the SB1383 requirements. All materials to educate our community on food waste recovery will be translated in English and Spanish and provided to residents by mail, bill inserts, social media, website, and channel 3; and,

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 Amend the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget to:

 Increase appropriations by $77,411 in Grants Refuse Activity Expenditure Account 225-6020-1325-2306-0000-000.
 Increase revenues in account number 225-5889-000 by $77,411.

Section 2 The City of Colton City Manager or designee is hereby authorized and directed to submit any required documents, invoices, and reports required to obtain grant funding.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st DAY OF February 2023.

__________________________
FRANK J. NAVARRO
Mayor

9.a
Packet Pg. 452
Attachment: R-14-23 (3967 : Grant - CalRecycle)

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10

11 12

13 14

15 16

17 18

19 20

21 22

23 24

25 26

27 28

ATTEST:

__________________________________
CAROLINA R. PADILLA
City Clerk

9.a
Packet Pg. 453
Attachment: R-14-23 (3967 : Grant - CalRecycle)

ITEM NO. 10

STAFF REPORT

DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: CAROLINA PADILLA, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: WAIVE FULL READING, READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND APPROVE

SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND, CERTAIN
SECTIONS IN CHAPTERS 18.04; 18.06; 18.24, 18.26, 18.28, AND

18.48 OF TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE COLTON MUNICIPAL CODE

RELATED TO DEFINITIONS, PERMITTED USES, DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS IN THE I-P (INDUSTRIAL PARK), M-1 (LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL) AND M-2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) ZONES, AND
SPECIAL PROVISIONS (FILE INDEX NO. DAP-001-697),
ORDINANCE NO. O-01-23.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

It is recommended that the City Council Waive full reading, and Approve Second Reading of AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON TO AMEND, CERTAIN SECTIONS IN CHAPTERS 18.04; 18.06; 18.24, 18.26, 18.28, AND 18.48 OF TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE COLTON MUNICIPAL CODE

RELATED TO DEFINITIO NS, PERMITTED USES, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE I-P (INDUSTRIAL PARK), M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) AND M-2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) ZONES, A ND SPECIAL PROVISION S (FILE INDEX NO. DA P-001- 697).

ATTACHMENT

1. O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy
10 Packet Pg. 454
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1

ORDINANCE NO. O-01-23

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA, AMEND CERTAIN SECTIONS IN CHAPTERS 18.04; 18.06; 18.24, 18.26,

18.28, AND 18.48 OF TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE COLTON MUNICIPA L CODE

RELATED TO DEFINITIO NS, PERMITTED U SES, DEVELOPMENT STA NDARDS IN THE I -P (INDUSTRIAL PARK), M -1 (LIGHT IN DUSTRIAL) AND M -2 (H EAVY INDUSTRIAL) ZONES, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS (FILE INDEX NO. DAP-001-697).

WHEREAS, on March 22, 202 2, the Planning Commission of the City of Colton (“Planning Co mmission”) conducted a duly noticed public hearing and recommended the City Council of the City of Colton (“City Council”) amend Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code (the “Municipal Code”). Following the conclusion of said hearing, the Planning Commissio n adopted their Resolution No. R -01-22, recommending approval to the City Council to amend (“Zoning Text Amendment”) Chapters 18.04; 18.06; 18.24, 18.26, 18.28, and 18.48 of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has deter mined that the Zoning Text Amendment is consistent with the City of Colton General Plan (“General Plan”) as indicated below; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed Zoning Text Amendment is in the best interests of the City, and th at it would be in the public interest to approve the Zone Text Amendment; and

WHEREAS, the City Council appointed Warehouse Moratorium Ad-Hoc Committee met four times to discuss, review and provide direction to staff in the crafting of the zoning text amendment taking into account comments received from the public outreach efforts made by the City;
WHEREAS, the City Staff met held three public outreach meetings with industrial sector representatives and community meetings with Colton residents and interest ed parties. The Ad - Hoc Committee and staff considered and included many of the comments received in the proposed ordinance;

10.a
Packet Pg. 455
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 2 -

WHEREAS, the Zoning Text Amendment was reviewed, studied and found exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) as more fully described below; and

WHEREAS, on February 7, 2023 the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at which persons wishing to testify in connection with the Zoning Text Amendment were heard and the Zoning Text Amendment was comprehensively reviewed.

WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts the recitals and findings set forth above and in the agenda report prepared in connection with this Ordinance.

SECTION 2. General Plan Consistency. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, including the staff report and the findings made in this Ordinance, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the proposed Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Colton General Plan and is reasonably related to the public welfare of the citizens of the C ity and surrounding regions. The Zoning Text Amendment is necessary to provide clarity to implement existing regulations, provide consistency with other code regulations, allow flexibility to certain standards, and address potential negative impacts. Speci fically, provisions in the ordinance address the following General Plan policies:

Land Use Element:
o Policy LU -1.1: “Ensure that all new development conforms to all applic able provisions of the General Plan and Zoning Code.” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development proposal to ensure consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Code as proposed herein with chapters 18.04 (Definitions) ; 18.06 (Permitted Uses) ; 18.24 (Industrial Park ); 18.26 (M-1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M-2 Heavy Industrial) ; and 18.48 (Special Provisions)

10.a
Packet Pg. 456
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 3 -

including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions.

o Policy LU -1.6: “Ensure that new development project s are compatible with permitted, well-maintained uses and buildings in the surrounding neighborhood or district.” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definition s), 1806 (Permitted Uses),

18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions.

o Policy LU‐1.8 : “Interpret the Land Use Plan in a manner that provides for compatibility between adjacent land uses, and that allows the City to achieve land use, design, and economic development objectives.” The proposed zoning text amendments provide for parking, special findings and findings within a Conditional Use Permit review process to ensure projects are reviewed to be compatible within a neighborhood to achieve land use, design and economic development objectives. This includes compliance with new Special Provisions for “ warehouse logistics and distribution and truck and trailer storage and parking uses.” This include s differentiating the sizes between a General Warehouse and a Logistics and Distribution Warehouse. The maximum size of a General Warehouse at 98,010 square feet was derived by using the existing 45 percent typical lot coverage of an acre and multiplying it by 5 (5 -acre equivalent), which is the min imum size of sites developed for warehouse purposes . An additional 10 percent was added to the maximum square footage (as permitted through the Minor Modification process in the Zoning Code) to , arriv e at a minimum size for a Logistics and Distribution to be 107,811 square feet in area.

o Goal LU -19: “ Minimize conflicts between industrial activity and residential neighborhoods in South Colton .” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with

10.a
Packet Pg. 457
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 4 -

existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M-2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including a dding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions.

o Policy LU‐19.1: “Require that new and expanded industrial and commercial uses adjacent to residential neighborhoods use physical design feat ures such as buffering, landscaping, setbacks, screening, operational standards, and other methods to minimize light, glare, noise, dust, odor, vibration, traffic, and other impacts. Apply the buffering approach identified in Policy LU‐8.2. ” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18 .26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and

18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions, such as new buffer separation distance requ irements between residential neighborhoods, new building placement requirements, architectural design, screening, stormwater, parking, noise, security standards, operational, air quality standards.

o Policy LU‐19.2: “Provide logical transitions between ind ustrial development and adjacent single‐ family neighborhoods through careful treatment of scale, massing, and the location of services that respond sensitively to adjacent residential uses .” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that a llows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Indus trial); and

18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions, such as new buffer separation distance requirements between residential neighborhoods, new bu ilding placement requirements, architectural design, and screening standards.

10.a
Packet Pg. 458
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 5 -

o Policy LU‐19.3: “ Prohibit through truck traffic on residential streets in south Colton, and develop programs, such as traffic calming, to discourage use of neighborhood streets for commercial vehicle traffic.” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 18 06 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M-1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisi ons, such as new buffer separation distance requirements between residential neighborhoods, building placement requirements, noise, operational, air quality standards.

Model Air Quality Element
o Policy 1.5: “ Support Innovative Approaches – Advocate and sup port innovative strategies to improve air quality. ” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M-2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with ne w Special Provisions, such as with new operational and air quality standards.

o Goal 4 – Land Use: “ A pattern of land uses which can be efficiently served by diversified transportation system and land development projects, which directly and indirectly generate the minimum feasible air pollutants.” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definiti ons), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M-1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and comply with new Special Provisions, such as allowing warehouse uses,

10.a
Packet Pg. 459
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 6 -

truck/trailer storage/parking in the M -2 (Heavy Industrial) zone and taking out of the M-1 (Light Industrial) and B -P (Business Park) zones. The M -1 and B -P zones are located adjacent to residential zones and not compatible with heavier industrial uses such as warehouse logistics and distribution and truck and trailer storage and parking uses. Smaller general warehouse uses will continue to be permitted in all industrial zones, but must now also comply with ne w Special Provisions including obtaining a Conditional Use Permit.

o Policy 4.3 Protect Sensitive Receptors: “Support a regional approach to regulating the location and design of land uses which are especially sensitive to air pollution.” The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses permitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and sensitive receptors as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses), 18.24 (Industrial Park ), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit requirement and comply with new Special Provisions. The City of Colton’s effo rts in updating its Zoning Code to more accurately be in conformance with its adopted General Plan Land Use, Mobility and Air Quality Elements and also joining many other cities/counties in the region (e.g., Jurupa Valley, Riverside, Fontana, Rialto and Riverside County) that have updated similar codes related to warehouse logistics distribution and truck and trailer storage and parking uses.

Mobility Element
o Policy M‐5.6: “Ensure that the designated truck routes conform to the following performance criteria:
 Truck routes must avoid intrusions into residential neighborhoods to limit noise, vibration, and air quality impacts.
 To the extent feasible, truck routes will not be provided on local streets and on streets with mostly residential frontage.

10.a
Packet Pg. 460
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 7 -

 Truck routes must be located on roadways that provide direct and convenient access between Major Arterials and freeways (I‐10 and I‐215) and industrial and commercial businesses.
 Truck routes must be located on roadways with the design and construction capacity to accommodate truck traffic.”
The Ordinance will modify regulations and uses pe rmitted that allows for review of use and development to ensure compatibility with existing neighborhoods and districts as proposed within chapters, 18.04 (Definitions), 1806 (Permitted Uses),

18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 Heavy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) including adding a new requirement for such uses to obtain a Conditional Use Permit requirement and comply with new Special Provisions , such as with standards in the Operational subsection requirement fo r a “truck route plan prepared by a licensed traffic engineer” traveling to the warehouse, business park or truck/trailer storage and parking uses and implementing and monitoring of approved truck route plan during normal business hours.

SECTION 3. Pursuant to section 18.58.050 F. of Title 18 (Zoning Code), in considering any request for a change of zone, the Commission shall review if the following conditions prevail before recommending to the City Council that the changes be granted:

Pursuant to section 18.58.050 F. of Title 18 (Zoning Code), in considering any request for a change of zone, the Commission shall review if the following conditions prevail before recommending to the City Council that the changes be granted:

1. That the proposed change of zone is in conformity with the General Plan of the City , in that the proposed changes are consistent with the existing provisions of the Colton Zoning Code and are in the public interest since they more closely conform zoning regulations with development goals and the City’s General Plan.

2. That there is a need in the community for more of the types of Uses Permitted by the zone, in that the proposed changes are being clarified with modifications to definitions within zoning district tables and within zoning stand ards/requirements further are in the public interest since they closely more closely conform zoning regulations with

10.a
Packet Pg. 461
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 8 -

development goals and the City’s General Plan. The proposed code amendments also includes special provisions for specified industrial uses address concerns received by the public as related to environmental impacts and adjacency compatibility issues (e.g., noise, traffic, and air quality) for larger industrial projects and truck and trailer storage and parking uses.

3. That the proposed change of zone would not adversely affect the surrounding area or the community in general, in that the proposed changes recommend clarification and addition of definitions, zoning district tables and amend portions of the Title 18 (Zoning Code) are i n the publi c interest since they more closely conform zoning regulations with City development goals and the City’s General Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives in achieving a balance of land use types that create diverse opportunities for housing, employment, and commerce.

SECTION 4. The City of Colton finds that the proposed Zone Text Amendment to permit address various items including, but not limited to: adding and/or modifying definitions, and modifying and adding certain land uses in use tables; modifying allowances for certain permitted, conditional, and prohibited land uses in various zones; and amending and adding certain regulations for definitions, permitted uses, development standards in 18.24 (Industrial Park), 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial); 18.48 (M -2 He avy Industrial); and 18.48 (Special Provisions) , under specified conditions and entitlement processes, is reasonably related to the public welfare of the citizens of the City and surrounding region; more specifically, the Ordinance includes appropriate res trictions to ensure that the proposed standards meet all safety standards including Building and Safety Codes, Fire Codes and review/approval by the City Engineer.

SECTION 5. Certain sections of Chapter 18.04 (Definitions) of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code, pertaining to Definitions, are hereby amended or added to read as follows with new text shown in boldface underline ( text), deleted text shown in strikethrough ( text), updated text in bold red with existing text to remain unchanged shown withou t boldface underline nor strikethrough:

18.04. – Definitions

10.a
Packet Pg. 462
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 9 -

18.04.101. Business park, “business park” means a group of one or more substantially compatible and cross-supporting uses, typically in separate buildings with multiple tenant spaces, on a single parcel or multiple contiguous parcels of land that are planned, developed, and operated as an integrated site with shared common areas for such uses and supporting ancillary uses with no truck dock areas other than a rear entry door or ground level loadin g style roll up door (s). Special design attention is given to building occupancy type, circulation, parking (restaurant, warehouse, office, manufacturing, and auto repair), utility needs, aesthetics, and compatibility. Basic elements of a business park in clude, but are not limited to, the following: developments that are themed to a particular profession or discipline and contain strong branding; shared open space, parking, and amenities; architectural, design, and signage consistency; on -site management, property owners associations (POAs), governing documents such as covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R ’s), and may be held in condominium or in fee ownership.

18.04.403 Sensitive Receptors. “Sensitive Receptors” means Sensitive receptors include, but are not limited to, hospitals, schools, daycare facilities, elderly housing , residential uses, and convalescent facilities. These are areas where the occupants are more susceptible to the adverse effects of exposure to toxic chemicals, pesticides, and o ther pollutants such as noise, light/glare, truck traffic, vibration, and smells. Extra care must be taken when dealing with warehouse logistic and distribution uses, truck and trailer storage and parking use, contaminants and pollutants in close proximit y to areas recognized as sensitive receptors.

18.04.4534 - Warehousing. "Warehousing" means the Use of a Building or Buildings primarily for the storage of Goods of any type, but excluding bulk storage of Materials which are flammable or explosive or which create Hazardous or commonly recognized offensive

18.04.454. Warehouse, General. “ Warehouse, General” means Warehousing facility means the use of a building primarily for the storage of goods of any type by one or two businesses and used for the sale or distribution of those goods to their direct customers (excluding bulk storage of materials which are flammable or explosive or which create hazardous or commonly recognized offensive conditions). The maximum lot coverage

10.a
Packet Pg. 463
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 10 -

of 45 percent floor area ratio ( FAR) is 0.5 and may not exceed 98,010 21,780 square feet per acre with a maximum building size of 108,900 square feet with dock high and/or ground level loading doors restricted to one side of the building.

18.04.455 Warehousing, Logistics and Distribut ion. “Warehousing, logistics and distribution facility” means warehouse/distribution facilities including fulfillment centers/high cube distribution used for the storage and/or consolidation of manufactured goods (and to a lesser extent, raw materials a nd excludes bulk storage of materials, which are flammable or explosive or create hazardous or commonly recognized offensive conditions) before their distribution to retail locations or other warehouses. Warehouse/distribution centers are generally greater than 107,811 square feet in size, with a lot coverage ratio of 45 percent, and a dock -high loading door ratio of approximately 1:5,000 - 8,000 square feet. They are characterized by dock high loading doors, could be on opposing sides of the building (cross dock facility); significant movement and storage of products, materials, or equipment; truck activities frequently outside of the peak hour of the adjacent street system; and freeway access, including:
• Freight yards/forwarding terminals
• Moving agencies
• Parcel delivery terminals/Shipping/receiving yards
• Truck terminals

SECTION 5. Section 18.06.060 of Chapter 18.06 (Uses Permitted) of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code, pertaining to the Uses Permitted in Each Zone, is hereby amended to add the followin g text modifications and addition to read as follows with new text is shown in boldface underline ( text) and deleted text is shown in strikethrough ( text) with existing text to remain unchanged shown without boldface underline nor strikethrough:

G. Industrial Districts Table I-P M-1 M-2 Business Park, subject to Special Provisions 18.48 C C C

10.a
Packet Pg. 464
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 11 -

Truck and Trailer Storage or Parking, subject to Special Provisions Chapter 18.48 N C N C
Warehouse, General, subject to Special Provisions Chapter 18.48 P C P C P C
Warehousing Logistics and Distribution, subject to Special Provisions Chapter 18.48 N N C

SECTION 6. Sections 18.24.130 and 170 of Chapter 18.24 I-P (Industrial Park) of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code, pertai ning to Special Provision requirements is hereby amended to read as follows with added and modified text is shown in boldface underline ( text) and deleted text is shown in strikethrough ( text) with existing text to remain unchanged shown without boldface underline nor strikethrough:

18.24.130 - Landscaping.

In all commercial and industrial Developments:

A. Landscaping Shall be provided for the Development of any Lot with a minimum Landscaping coverage of fifteen percent of the Lot Area. The Landscaping Shall p rovide a mixture of shrubs, trees, groundcover, flowers and lawns throughout the entire Front Yard area, Side Yard areas, Parkways and throughout Open Spaces not occupied by access ways, parking areas and Sidewalks. One tree per three customer/employee and truck/trailer Parking Spaces Shall be provided and planted throughout the landscaped areas. Twenty-five percent of the trees Shall be of twenty -four inch box size, another twenty-five percent of thirty -six inch box size, and the remainder May be a minimum of fifteen-gallon size. Landscape and irrigation plans Shall be prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer, and submitted to the Community Development Director along with the general Building plans for review and Approval.

B. The required Landsca ping Shall be maintained in a neat, clean, safe, orderly and healthful condition.

C. The landscaped areas Shall be provided with a suitable permanent method for watering or sprinkling of plants. Wherever possible, the watering system Shall utilize the least amount of water. Sprinklers Used to satisfy the requirements of this provision Shall be so spaced as to assure complete coverage of the landscaped areas.

10.a
Packet Pg. 465
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 12 -

D. Areas proposed for Development in another phase Shall be temporarily turfed, seeded and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control, if the phase will not begin construction within six Months of completion of the previous phase.

18.24.170 Special Provisions. Specified Uses within Chapter 18.48 (Special Provisions), section 18.48.134 of this code.

SECTION 7. Sections 18.26.130 and 170 of Chapter 18.26 (M -1 Light Industrial) of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code, pertaining to Special Provision requirements is hereby amended to read as follows with added and modified text is shown in boldface underline (text) and deleted text is shown in strikethrough ( text) with existing text to remain unchanged shown without boldface underline nor strikethrough:

18.26.130 - Landscaping.

Landscaping Shall be provided for the Development of any Lot with a minimum Landsc aping coverage of fifteen percent of the Lot Area. The Landscaping Shall provide a mixture of shrubs, trees, groundcover, flowers and lawns throughout the entire Front Yard area, Side Yard areas, Parkways and throughout Open Spaces not occupied by access ways, parking areas and Sidewalks. One tree per three customer/employee and truck/trailer Parking Spaces Shall be provided and planted throughout the landscaped areas. Twenty -five percent of the trees Shall be of twenty -four inch box size, another twenty -five percent of thirty -six inch box size, and the remainder May be a minimum of fifteen -gallon size. Landscape and irrigation plans Shall be prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer, and submitted to the Community Development Director along wit h the general Building plans for review and Approval.

18.26.170 Special Provisions. Specified Uses within Chapter 18.48 (Special Provisions) of this code.

SECTION 8. Sections 18.28.130 and 170 of Chapter 18.28 (M -2 Heavy Industrial) of Title 18 of the C olton Municipal Code, pertaining to Special Provision requirements is hereby amended to read as follows with modified text is shown in boldface underline ( text) and deleted text is shown in strikethrough ( text) with existing text to remain unchanged shown without boldface underline nor strikethrough:

10.a
Packet Pg. 466
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 13 -

18.28.130 - Landscaping.

Landscaping Shall be provided for the Development of any Lot with a minimum Landscaping coverage of fifteen percent of the Lot Area. The Landscaping Shall provide a mixture of shrubs, trees, groundcover, flowers and lawns throughout the entire Front Yard area, Side Yard areas, Parkways and throughout Open Spaces not occupied by access ways, parking areas and Sidewalks. One tree per three customer/employee and truck/trailer Parking Spaces Shall be provided and planted throughout the landscaped areas. Twenty -five percent of the trees Shall be of twenty -four-inch box size, another twenty -five percent of thirty -six-inch box size, and the remainder May be a minimum of fifteen -gallon size. Land scape and irrigation plans Shall be prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer, and submitted to the Community Development Director along with the general Building plans for review and Approval.

18.28.170 Special Provisions. Specified Uses within Chapter 18.48 (Special Provisions) of this code.

SECTION 9. Section 18.48.134 Truck and Trailer Storage or Parking of Chapter 18.48 (Special Provisions) of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code, pertaining to , is hereby added to Warehouse Logistics and Distribution and Truck and Trailer Storage; Parking; Business Park; and General Warehouses read as follows with new text is shown in boldface underline ( text) and deleted text is shown in strikethrough (text), and updated text in bold underline with existing text to remain unchanged shown without boldface underline nor strikethrough:

18.48.134_Warehouse, Truck and Trailer Storage/Parking and Business Park

Purpose: In response to community concerns on the environmental, operational, aesthetic, proximity to residential zones and noise concerns, this special provision includes new standards for the following specified industrial uses listed herein.  Business Park
 Truck and Trailer Storage and Parking
 Warehouses, General
 Warehouse Logistics and Distribution
Section 18.06.060 —Uses Permitted of this Code requires a Conditional Use Permit or

10.a
Packet Pg. 467
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 14 -

prohibits the uses in specified zones . The following special standards shall apply when conditionally permitted in addition to development standards listed in each zone and/or other local, state or federal codes applicable to such uses :

A. Proximity to Residential Zone.

1. Within 800 feet of a Residenti al zone, limit operations, including loading, unloading, staging and storage of trucks and trailers to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Saturdays, and shall be prohibited on S undays and state and federal holidays unless a noise study prepared by a qualified professional can demonstrate that noise related to operations during these house will not exceed the City’s adopted noise standards within adjacent Residential zone.

B. Building Placement.

1. Any warehouse greater than 107,811 108,900 square feet in size, the building loading dock shall be located a minimum of three-hundred ( 300) feet away measured from the property line of the sensitive receptor to the nearest dock door which do es not exclusively serve electric trucks . using a (setback measurements shall use a straight line method).

2. Each project located within 1,000 feet of a Sensitive Receptor or Residential Zone shall provide design analysis to minimize impacts on Sensitive Receptors and residential uses of entrance and exit points to the site.

C. Architectural Design:

1. All buildings and structures shall incorporate enhanced architectural treatments on all sides visible from public view. Enhanced architectural treatments include combinations of accent building materials, windows/spandrel glass, reveals, metal eyebrow accents, cornices, etc.

2. “Cool pavement” materials shall be utilized to reduce heat island effects.

3. Site plan drawings shall identify the type of climate control and air filtration systems in warehouse facilities to promote worker well-being.

4. Signage for directional guidance for vehicles entering and existing the facility shall be provided on -site, including directional guidance to the nearest truck route.

10.a
Packet Pg. 468
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 15 -

5. Each project shall provide on -site signage for directional guidance to trucks entering and exiting the facility to minimize potential impacts on Sensitive Receptors.

D. Screening Standards:

1. Industrial uses shall be screened from Sensitive Receptors , public right -of- way, and residential zones using appropriate wall design, incorporating landscaping and/or increased wall heights.

2. Loading areas, docks, truck wells and internal circulation routes shall be oriented away (or fully screened) from residential neighborhoods , schools, parks, day care centers, nursing homes, hospitals or other public places and from public rights -of-way to the extent feasible to the satisfaction of the Approving Authority.

3. All items stored outside, including trucks and trailers within parking areas and courts, shall be completely screened from public view, by a combination of buildings and/or solid screen walls of either decorative concrete masonry block or decorative concrete tilt -up walls. Screen walls shall not be located within any require d front yard or street side building or landscape setback area.

4. All items stored outside, including trucks and trailers within parking areas, shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height unless a taller wall (with approval of Variance) is provided to effectively screen along street frontages.

5. A combination of eight (8) foot tall metal or masonry fencing and a five (5) foot wide landscape planter may be provided in lieu of solid fencing along the side of the side and rear property lines in areas where the site is not visible to the public. A combination of trees and shrubs shall be provided to ensure adequate screening.

6. Anti-graffiti coating or equivalent measure to prevent graffiti shall be provided for all solid screen walls facing a public right-of-way.

E. Stormwater: Underground stormwater chambers shall be provided to avoid the need for aboveground basins. Alternatively, aboveground basins may be permitted if the depth of the basin does not require fencing and can be planted

10.a
Packet Pg. 469
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 16 -

with shrubs and groundcover so as t o appear as part of the landscaped area of the site.

F. Parking Requirements:

1. All passenger vehicle parking lots, drive aisles or truck courts, and outdoor storage areas shall be paved with “cool pavement” materials ; no areas shall remain unfinished and all areas of a developed site shall be finished with a permanent surface or permanent landscaping materials and irrigation.

2. Sufficient space, including additional overflow areas, shall be provided to accommodate all maneuvering, queuing, stacking, loading, unl oading, and parking of vehicles on -site to avoid queuing, stacking, loading, unloading, and parking of vehicles off-site on adjacent streets.

3. The facility site plan shall base truck vehicle space specifications, loading, parking and stacking specification s, and maneuvering standards on the Surface Transportation Act (STAA) and California Standard design vehicle.

G. Landscape Standards:

1. All outdoor storage uses (including truck storage) shall incorporate a minimum of fifteen (15) foot deep landscaped setbacks along all public street frontages with a combination of trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Parking of motor vehicles is not permitted within the required setback area.

2. All outdoor storage uses shall provide a minimum ten (10) foot wide landscape planter at th e base of any buildings and screening walls that are visible from and face street frontages. Planting within these planters any setback, planter or landscape buffer areas shall consist of a combination of small to medium scale trees 15-inch, 24-inch and 36 -inch box trees , shrubs, and groundcover vegetation to soften the edge of the building or screen wall, and shall be consistent with subsections 18.24.130, 18.26.130, and 12.28.130 – Landscaping.

3. Trees shall be planted every thirty twenty (320) linear feet within all landscaped planters on-site. Two (2) rows of trees shall be provided within all landscape setbacks adjacent to public streets. A minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the trees on -site shall consist of evergreen broadleaf tree species to ensure year-round coverage.

10.a
Packet Pg. 470
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 17 -

4. A preliminary landscape plan shall be required when submitting a Planning application, showing general location of the trees, shrubs, and ground cover.

The landscaping areas should be lushly landscaped with adequate number and placement o f landscaping including but not limited to trees, shrubs, bushes, groundcover, and rocks/boulders. The proposed landscape plan should ensure a unified and cohesive design theme while considering appropriateness to climatic conditions, soil conditions, and concern for maintenance and water conservation.

H. Noise.

1. A Transportation Demand Management measures for industrial uses with over one hundred employees to reduce work -related vehicle trips shall be provided, prior to occupancy.

2. Compliance with Title 18 – The City Noise Standards shall be met. The project shall not cause noise levels to exceed City Noise Standards within residential zones or other sensitive land uses for projects within 800 or 1,000 feet of a residential zone.

I. Security Standards.

1. All o utdoor storage shall be secured and incorporate security cameras that are connected to the City’s enforcement system to the satisfaction of the Police Chief.

J. Operational Standards

1. Warehousing and distribution facilities generating more than 50 truck trips per day, as determined by the most recent Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Rate for the specific land use, shall prepare an Operations and Truck Route Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer as part of the Conditional Use Permit application. i. The plan shall describe the operational characteristics of the proposed use, including but not limited to, hours of operation, projected number of employees, types of items permitted to be stored (outdoors) at the site, and the proposed truck routing to and from the facility to the designated truck routes that avoids passing residential, educational,

10.a
Packet Pg. 471
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 18 -

park and recreational use areas to the greatest extent feasible. ii. The plan shall also include physical and operational meas ures for preventing truck queuing, stopping, and parking on public streets.

2. The operator of the warehouse, storage and/or trucking use shall be responsible for implementing and monitoring the Operations and Truck Route Plan during all operations, including but not limited to posting the plan and educating truck drivers on the approved routes.

3. Drivers shall not sleep or reside within any vehicle on -site overnight or for any extended duration of time.

4. Idling of trucks queued or operated onsite shall not exceed 5 minutes.

5. All on-site equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, shall be electric with necessary electric charging stations provided.

6. All facility or tenant -owned and operated fleet equipment with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 14,000 pounds accessing the site shall meet or exceed 2010 model -year emissions equivalent engine standards are currently defined in the California Code of Regulations Title 13, Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 4.5, Section 2025.

7. Operators shall address any park ing, traffic, noise or safety issues within forty-eight hours of being notified by the city that an issue exists.

8. Prior to the issuance of a Business Occupancy Permit or Business License for any new tenant or operator of a warehouse or truck, trailer stora ge facility, a new or revised Operations and Truck Route Plan prepared by a licensed traffic engineer associated with the new tenant shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer , demonstrating that the proposed operations and project tra ffic associated with the new tenant or operator is the same or less than the project traffic and operations assume in the approved entitlements for the facility.

9. Where transport by temperature-controlled trucks or trailers is proposed, on-site electrical hookups shall be provided at loading docks. Idling or use of auxiliary truck engine power to power climate -control equipment shall be prohibited.

10.a
Packet Pg. 472
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 19 -

K. Air Quality

1. Warehouses and distribution facilities generating 150 or more truck trips per day, as determined b y the most recent Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Rate for the specific land use or within 1000 feet of a sensitive receptor, shall prepare a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Guideline for the new development or substantial enlargement of industrial uses.

2. Each project shall provide specific design criteria to m inimize exposure to diesel emissions for residential neighborhoods, schools, parks, playgrounds, day care cente rs, nursing homes, hospitals, and other public places (Sensitive Receptors) situated in close proximity to the industrial uses.

3. Each project shall provide and be i n compliance with CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act), and prepare an SCAQMD URBEMIS (South Coast Air Quality Management District) and EMFAC (Emission Factor) computer models to identify the significance of air quality impacts on Sensitive Receptors.

SECTION 10. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and Sections 15060(b)(3). The activity is not subject to CEQA because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a signi ficant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The proposed amendments propose regulatory and administrative amendments to the zoning code. Additional environmental review will be conducted on projects that are affected by these changes.

SECTION 1 1. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Ordinance is based are located at the City Clerk’s office

10.a
Packet Pg. 473
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 20 -

located at 650 N. La Cadena Drive, Colton, California 92324. The custodian of these records is the City Clerk.

SECTION 12. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any entity, person or circumstance is held for any reason to be invalid or unconstitutional , such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City C ouncil of the City of Colton hereby declare that they would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 13. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following its adoption.

SECTION 14. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.

Not later than fifteen (15) days following the passage of this Ordinance, the Ordinance, or a summary thereof, along with the names of the City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance, shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Colton.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this_____ day of _______, 2022.

City of Colton

______________________________
Frank J. Navarro, Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________________
Carolina R. Padilla, City Clerk

10.a
Packet Pg. 474
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

23152.06020\32617662.1 - 21 -

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney

10.a
Packet Pg. 475
Attachment: O-01-23_Final_Redline Copy (3972 : Second Reading of Ordinance O-01-23)

ITEM NO. 11

STAFF REPORT

DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: CAROLINA PADILLA, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: WAIVE FULL READING, READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND APPROVE

SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE 2022

CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC (SPEED) SURVEY,
ORDINANCE NO. O-2-23.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

It is recommend ed that the City Council Waive full reading, and Approve the Second Reading of AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON AMENDING SECTION 10.04.130 OF THE COLTON
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SPEED LIMITS ON CITY STREETS.

ATTACHMENT

1. EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized

2. EXHIBIT B - Ordinance - Speed Study 2022
11 Packet Pg. 476
Engineering and Traffic Surve y
Final Report
Prepared for: City of Colton
December 2022
GTS.210203
GTS
11900 W
Olympic Blvd, Suite
450
Los Angeles, CA 90064
T. 213 267 2332
www.gentecsol.com
Prepared by:
cff>GTS

11.a
Packet Pg. 477
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23)

2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

i
Table of Contents

Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 2 Background ............................................................................................................. 4 Regulatory Requirements ....................................................................................... 6 California Vehicle Code (CVC) ................................................................................................ 6 City Municipal Code ............................................................................................................... 8 Methodology ............................................................................................................ 9 Data Collection ...................................................................................................................... 9 Speed Survey .................................................................................................................... 9 Roadway Characteristics ................................................................................................ 10 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) ............................................................................................ 10 Collision Rates ...................................................................................................................... 10 Analysis ................................................................................................................. 14 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 14 Results and Recommendations ........................................................................................... 18

Appendices
Appendix A: Speed Survey Summary Sheets
Appendix B: Speed Survey Data
Appendix C: Radar Certifications
Appendix D: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes

List of Figures

Figure 1. Street Segments and Recommended Speed Limits ................................................... 3

List of Tables

Table 1: Study Street Segments ................................................................................................ 5 Table 2. City of Colton Section 15.a Prima Facie Speed Limits ................................................. 8 Table 3. 2019 Expected Collision Rates .................................................................................. 11 Table 4: Collision Data per Segments ..................................................................................... 12 Table 5: Speed Zoning Analysis ............................................................................................... 15

11.a
Packet Pg. 478
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

2 Executive Summary
Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices.

This Engineering and Traffic Survey report was requested by and prepared for the City of Colton to provide the city with a basis for updating and validating the currently posted speed limits on citywide streets.

This study recommends the establishment and renewal of valid posted speed limits for forty- four (44) street segments on twenty-six (26) citywide streets within the City of Colton.

The report was prepared in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) including the most recent revisions effective January 1, 2022 and the latest revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) at the time of this study.

In establishing the appropriate posted speed limits, the analysis presented in the following pages takes into consideration the analysis of prevailing speeds, the collision history, and other traffic and road factors not readily apparent to the driver. Such factors include sight distance, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, pedestrian and bicyclist activity and safety, the 10-MPH pace range of prevailing traffic, roadside development and environment, parking practices, the density of adjacent residential and/or business uses, among others.

The draft findings of this Engineering and Traffic Survey reveal that all 44 surveyed street segments are recommended to remain at their currently established speed limits as documented and would not require any changes to the existing posted regulatory signage or speed limit pavement markings. This is driven, among other reasons, by the high number of speed related collisions on City streets, which implies that maintaining the existing speed zones is the most prudent decision despite an increase in the 85 th percentile speed on some segments. One segment in particular Hunts Lane from W Redlands Blvd to Washington Street in shared jurisdiction with City of San Bernardino requires coordination between the two cities to ensure consistency between both directions.

Figure 1 illustrates the street segments with recommended speed limits.

The following pages provide the supporting documentation of the survey’s methodology and findings. Following a brief background, the report is organized under three main headings that summarize the regulatory requirements, present the data collection and collision rates, and describe the analysis, results and recommendations. Appendix A summarizes the existing conditions, collision rates, recommended speed zones for each of the study segments.

11.a
Packet Pg. 479
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) FIGURE 1: CITY OF COLTON RECOMMENDED SPEED ZONES
NO. SEGMENT LIMIT 1
1 AGUA MANSARD S. RIVERSIDE AVE
2 BARTON RD WASHINGTON ST
3 BARTON RD S. LA CADENA DR
4 "C" STREET N. RANCHO AVE
5 COLTON AVE N. CITY LIMITS
6 CENTER ST S. RIVERSIDE AVE/MAIN ST
7 COOLEY DR E. COOLEY LN
8 COOLEY DR S. MT VERNON AVE
9 EUCALYPTUS AVE W. RANDALL AVE
10 FAIRWAY DR N. MT VERNON AVE
11 HUNTS LN W. REDLANDS BLVD
12 LA CADENA DR N. MT VERNON AVE
13 LA CADENA DR N. 8TH ST
14 LA CADENA DR VALLEY BLVD
15 LA CADENA DR RAILROAD OVERPASS
16 LAUREL ST GRAND AVE
17 LAUREL ST PENNSYLVANIA AVE
18 "M" ST S. LA CADENA DR
19 MERIDIAN AVE W. RANDALL AVE
20 MILL ST N. RANCHO AVE
21 MT VERNON AVE JOHNSTON ST
22 MT VERNON AVE CITRUS ST/GRANT AVE
23 MT VERNON AVE E. VALLEY BLVD
24 MT VERNON AVE COOLEY DR
25 CITRUS ST TERESA AVE
26 OLIVE ST MERIDIAN AVE
27 OLIVE ST N. RANCHO AVE
28 PENNSYLVANIA AVE MILL ST
29 PEPPER AVE W. RANDALL AVE
30 RANCHO AVE N. CITY LIMITS
31 RANCHO AVE MILL ST
32 RANCHO AVE AGUA MANSA RD
33 RANCHO AVE W.VALLEY BLVD
34 RECHE CANYON RD WASHINGTON ST
35 RIVERSIDE AVE AGUA MANSARD
36 RV CENTER DR 600 E WASHINGTON ST
37 SAN BERNARDINO AVE N. PEPPER AVE
38 SAN BERNARDINO AVE N. SYCAMORE AVE
39 VALLEY BLVD W. CITY LIMITS
40 VALLEY BLVD N. PEPPER AVE
41 VALLEY BLVD N. RANCHO AVE
42 WASHINGTON ST WEST END
43 WASHINGTON ST S. MT VERNON AVE
44 WASHINGTON ST RECHE CANYON RD
LIMIT 2 SPEED
LIMIT
S. RANCHO AVE 45 MPH
S. CITY LIMITS 50 MPH
E. CITY LIMITS 45 MPH
COLTON AVE 30 MPH
E. "E" ST 40 MPH
S. CITY LIMITS 40 MPH
WASHINGTON ST 35 MPH
E. COOLEY LN 40 MPH
SAN BERNARDINO AVE 30 MPH
AUTO CENTER RD 35 MPH
WASHINGTON ST 40 MPH
N. 8TH ST 35 MPH
VALLEY BLVD 35 MPH
R~LROAD OVERPASS 45 MPH
S. CITY LIMITS 50 MPH
PENNSYLVANIA AVE 35 MPH
N.MT VERNON AVE 35 MPH
MT VERNON AVE 40 MPH
VALLEY BLVD 40 MPH
R~LROAD OVERPASS 40 MPH
CITRUS ST /GRANT AVE 25 MPH
E. VALLEY BL VD 40 MPH
COOLEY DR 35 MPH
WASHINGTON ST 35 MPH
RANCHO AVE 25 MPH -
RAILROAD 30 MPH
N. LA CADENA DR 25 MPH
W. VALLEY BL VD 35 MPH
W. VALLEY BL VD 45 MPH
MILL ST 40 MPH
VALLEY BLVD 35 MPH
S. LA CADENA DR 45 MPH
AGUA MANSARD 45 MPH
S. CITY LIMITS 45 MPH
PLACENTIA LN 50 MPH
1000 E WASHINGTON ST 25 MPH
MERIDIAN AVE 35 MPH
N. PEPPER AVE 40 MPH
N. PEPPER AVE 45 MPH
N. RANCHO AVE 45 MPH
N. MT VERNON AVE 35 MPH
S. MT VERNON AVE 35 MPH
RECHE CANYON RD 40 MPH
WATERMAN AVE 40 MPH
I
I
L---•
I
L---,
Center St
I ~
)' ~
r
VJ~ )
,
~
((1
Grand
Terrace
San Be;nardino Count
Riverside County
Highgrove
Legend
Recommended Speed Zones
- 25MPH
/i - 45MPH
San (
1 - soMPH
Bernardino :_::J Colton City Boundary
/ I ..._ J County Boundaries
/ Unincorporated Areas
Surrounding Cities
- Bloomington
Grand Terrace
Highgrove
Loma Linda
Rialto
San Bernardino
-W Redlands Blvd
-,
I I
-- Ir
r! L J' ,r -,
j
·---·\.-: \ I
I
I
I
:

I
I
I
I
0 w
a,
J
~ iii .;
:a:
en
Loma Linda

0.5 1 mi

11.a
Packet Pg. 480
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

4 Background
The purpose of the 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey is to evaluate the speed limit of selected streets within the City of Colton (City), San Bernardino County. This study is required by the State of California to establish speed limits and maintain eligibility of enforcement on City roads in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) and California Vehicle Code (CVC).

The CVC authorizes local government bodies to establish effective and enforceable speed limits on city highways. The CVC Code sets the regulatory framework for Engineering and Traffic Surveys and describes the contributing factors in establishing speed limits being speed data, collision history, and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the road users. Several section of the CVC relevant to this study have been updated effective January 1, 2022. These sections were reviewed, summarized in the following chapter, and their requirements were incorporated as part of this study.

The CA-MUTCD defines standards and guidelines for establishing speed limits based on collecting speed data using radar or other electronic devices that measure the speed of moving objects to determine the change in the existing posted speed limit. This study is developed in compliance with the CA-MUTCD and California Vehicle Code mandates.

The street segments included in this study were determined based on pre-existing zone designations from earlier speed surveys, existing conditions observed in the field, and in consultation with City staff. A total 44 segments on 26 city wide streets were identified within the City’s jurisdiction. The segments are summarized in Table 1.

Per current regulations, the established speed limits in this study will be valid for seven years and can be further extended to fourteen years if no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume.

The following sections of this report are organized under three main headings:
- Regulatory Requirements: summarizing the more relevant elements of the CVC - Methodology: presenting the data collection and collision rates - Analysis: presenting the analysis, results and recommendations

11.a
Packet Pg. 481
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

5 Table 1: Study Street Segments
STREET SEGMENT LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2

1. AGUA MANSA ROAD S. Riverside Avenue S. Rancho Avenue

2. BARTON ROAD Washington Street South City Boundary Limits

3. BARTON ROAD S. La Cadena Drive E. City limits (UPRR)

4. "C" STREET N. Rancho Avenue Colton Avenue

5. COLTON AVENUE North City limit (Lytle Cajon Channel) E."E" Street

6. CENTER STREET S. Riverside Avenue/Main Street S. City Limits

7. COOLEY DRIVE E. Cooley Lane Washington Street

8. COOLEY DRIVE S. Mount Vernon Avenue E. Cooley Lane

9. EUCALYPTUS AVENUE W. Randall Avenue San Bernardino Avenue

10. FAIRWAY DRIVE N. Mount Vernon Avenue Auto Center Road

11. HUNTS LANE W. Redlands Boulevard Washington Street

12. LA CADENA DRIVE N. Mount Vernon Avenue N. 8th Street

13. LA CADENA DRIVE N. 8th Street Valley Boulevard

14. LA CADENA DRIVE Valley Boulevard BNSF Railroad Overpass

15. LA CADENA DRIVE BNSF Railroad Overpass S. City Limits

16. LAUREL STREET Grand Avenue Pennsylvania Avenue

17. LAUREL STREET Pennsylvania Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue

18. "M" STREET S. La Cadena Drive Mount Vernon Avenue

19. MERIDIAN AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard

20. MILL STREET N. Rancho Avenue BNSF Railroad Overpass

21. MOUNT VERNON AVENUE Johnston Street E. Citrus Street/Grant Avenue

22. MOUNT VERNON AVENUE E. Citrus Street/ Grant Avenue E. Valley Boulevard

23. MOUNT VERNON AVENUE E. Valley Boulevard Cooley Drive

24. MOUNT VERNON AVENUE Cooley Drive Washington Street

25. CITRUS STREET Teresa Avenue Rancho Avenue

26. OLIVE STREET Meridian Avenue Railroad

27. OLIVE STREET N. Rancho Avenue N. La Cadena Drive

28. PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard

29. PEPPER AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard

30. RANCHO AVENUE N. City Limit Mill Street

31. RANCHO AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard

32. RANCHO AVENUE Agua Mansa Road S. La Cadena Drive

33. RANCHO AVENUE W. Valley Boulevard Agua Mansa Road

34. RECHE CANYON ROAD Washington Street S. City Limit

35. RIVERSIDE AVENUE Agua Mansa Road Placentia Lane

36. RV CENTER DRIVE 600 E Washington Street 1000 E Washington Street

37. SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE N. Pepper Avenue Meridian Avenue

38. SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE N. Sycamore Avenue N. Pepper Avenue

39. VALLEY BOULEVARD W. City Limits N. Pepper Avenue

40. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Pepper Avenue N. Rancho Avenue

41. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Rancho Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue

42. WASHINGTON STREET West End S. Mount Vernon Avenue

43. WASHINGTON STREET S. Mount Vernon Avenue Reche Canyon Road

44. WASHINGTON STREET Reche Canyon Road Waterman Avenue

11.a
Packet Pg. 482
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

6 Regulatory Requirements
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
The California Vehicle Code presents regulations for establishing and enforcing speed zones.

These regulations generally reflect the perspective that speed zoning should be based on traffic conditions and normal driver behavior. This section highlights relevant sections of the CVC considered in establishing speed limits. For a detailed review of applicable codes, the reader is referred to the California Vehicle Code that can be accessed online via https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/.

CVC Section 235, 240, and 515: define respectively the “business district”, the determination of business and residence districts, and residence district.

CVC Section 627 : defines the “Engineering and traffic survey,” and stipulated that it shall include considerations for prevailing speeds, accident records, and highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Local authorities may also consider residential density as well as safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

CVC Section 22348: stipulates that a person shall not drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than the established speed limit.

CVC Section 22349: sets a maximum speed limit for highways at 65 mph and for two-lane undivided highways at 55 mph (unless posted otherwise)
CVC Section 22350: establishes the Basic speed Law which states that a person shall not drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent with due regard for weather, visibility, and traffic. The speed shall not endanger the safety of persons or property.

CVC Section 22352: defines Prima facia (at first impression) speed limits that are considered safe and prudent under normal conditions. This section establishes the 15 mph prima facia speed limits when traversing a railroad grade crossing, traversing intersections with restricted sight distance, and in alleyways. This section also establishes 25 mph prima facie speed limits in a business or residence district (as defined per CVC Sections 235 and 515), when approaching or passing a school building when children are present, or when passing a senior center.

CVC Section 22357 & 22358: authorize local agencies to respectively increase and decrease speed limits in a reasonable and safe manner on local streets to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic. Based on an engineering and traffic survey, a local agency may declare

11.a
Packet Pg. 483
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

7 a prima facie speed limits of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, or a maximum speed of 65 miles per hour.

CVC Section 22358.6: states that (effective January 1, 2022) in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment.

CVC Section 22358.7: authorizes a local authority to determine and declare (by ordinance) a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour if (1) a portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor; (2) a portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians; however, this section will only be applicable after June 30, 2024 or possibly an earlier date when the Judicial Council have developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations.

CVC Section 22358.8: authorizes (effective January 1, 2022) a local authority to retain (by ordinance) the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit.

CVC Section 22358.9: authorizes (effective January 1, 2022) a local authority to determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when the highways are a maximum of four traffic lanes. This section cannot be used when the speed limit has been lowered per Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8 noted earlier, and the maximum posted prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district shall be respectively 30 mph or 25 mph, if establishing a 25 mph or 20 mph speed limit.

The same section states that for a “business activity district” designation, at least three of the following four conditions shall be met: (1) no less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses; (2) parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway; (3) traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet; (4) marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device.

CVC Section 40802 (Division 17, Chapter 3) : defines a speed trap, which if found to exist, a citation will likely be dismissed. Effective January 1, 2002, a speed trap exists if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation. The period can be increased to 14 years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred.

11.a
Packet Pg. 484
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

8 This section also defines the “school zone”, the “senior zone” and the “local street or road”.

A 25-mph speed limit can be established without conducting a speed survey on a local road if it has a width of less than 40 feet, no more than one lane per direction, and less than half a mile of uninterrupted length.

City Municipal Code
In the City’s municipal code (Section 15.a), the City of Colton determined and declared the prima facie speed limit for four streets segments that are presented in the Table 2.

Table 2. City of Colton Section 15.a Prima Facie Speed Limits Street Name Limit 1 Limit 2 Prima Facia
Speed Limit
I Street 10th Street Mount Vernon Avenue 35 MPH
Mount Vernon Avenue Colton Avenue I Street 35 MPH
N La Cadena Drive Mount Vernon Avenue 8 th Street 35 MPH Colton Avenue 10th Street Fairview Avenue 35 MPH

11.a
Packet Pg. 485
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

9 Methodology
The current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California-MUTCD) specifies the methodology to be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys. This methodology includes the evaluation of existing speed, collision history and roadway conditions not readily apparent to road users. This methodology is based around a spot speed survey that typically consists of measuring speeds, with a radar or other electronics device, of a free-flowing traffic. The statistical speed parameter, 85 th percentile speed limit is used to establish speed limit.

Per Section 2B-13 of California MUTCD, when a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. However, roadway conditions that are not readily apparent to motorist may result in further reduction of 5 mph in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.

Data Collection
As speed zones are established based on existing speed data, recent collision history, and roadside conditions that might not be readily apparent to road users, GTS carried out a radar speed survey, reviewed field conditions and analyzed the recent collision history for the identified 44 roadway segments on 26 citywide streets within the City of Colton. Data of field conditions obtained includes roadway characteristics, current speed data, average daily traffic (ADT), and collisions.

Speed Survey
Spot radar speed surveys were conducted to determine the prevailing speed of drivers on each of the 44 segment locations during March 2022. The surveys were performed during typical weekdays between 9 A.M. to 2 P.M. with a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles.

Speed survey data for each of the segments is provided in Appendix B and the radar (and radar operator) certifications are provided in Appendix C.

The speed-related statistical parameters were extracted from speed survey data, prime among which are the 85th percentile speed and 10-mph pace. - 85th percentile speed also known as critical speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving, and critically represent one standard deviation above the average speed. According to current regulations, the 85th percentile speed should be the starting point for establishing of the prima facie speed. - 10 mph pace is defined as the range in which the largest number of observations fall.

Normally, sixty to seventy percent of free-flowing vehicles drive within the 10 mile per hour pace speed. It is a general practice that the recommended speed limit should be within 10 mph pace.

11.a
Packet Pg. 486
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

10 Roadway Characteristics
Existing roadway conditions for the 44 study segments were collected based on field observations and desktop analysis. Roadway conditions were collected for each study segments and include but not limited to abutting land uses (residential, business, or commercial), lane configurations, proximity to schools, on-street parking, visibility restrictions (sight distance), pedestrian activity and presence of crosswalks, as well as geometric constraints (narrow streets, horizontal and vertical curves, skewed intersections, steep slopes, etc.)
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
The 24-hour average daily traffic volumes for the 44 segments were collected from machine traffic counters in the field during a typical weekday. These counts are used to calculate the collision rates discussed below. The ADT data for each segment is provided as Appendix D.

Collision Rates
The number of collisions on each segment were obtained using the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), Safe Transportation Research and Education Center, University of California, Berkeley.

Collision data was obtained for a 4-year period between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2020. From the collected collision data, collisions by speeding were separated to determine the percentage of collisions due to unsafe speed.

A collision rate, expressed in terms of collisions per million vehicle miles traveled, is calculated on each segment based on several parameters including average daily traffic, segment length and analysis period in days as shown in the equation below.

Collision Rate =
Total No. of Collisions x 1,000,000
Distance x ADT x No. of Days

Where:
- Total No. of Collisions: Total Number of collisions on the segment during the analysis period (4 years), both directions
- ADT: Average Daily Traffic (vehicles/day), both directions - Distance: Roadway segment distance travelled by each vehicle (miles) - No. of Days: Number of days during the selected analysis period (4 years = 1,460 days) The calculated collision rates were calculated for each segment.

To evaluate collision rates that can be reasonably expected, the study segment collision rates were compared to collision rates on segments of similar characteristics with Caltrans District 8 (San Bernardino and Riverside counties) using the 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways, Caltrans. Table 3 illustrates the 2019 average collision rates per roadway type.

11.a
Packet Pg. 487
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

11 Table 3. 2019 Expected Collision Rates
Roadway Type
(Urban)
Expected Collision Rate
(Collisions per million vehicle miles)
2 Lane And 3 Lane 1.08
4+ Undivided 0.86
4+ Divided 1.33
Source: 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). Issued by: The California Department of Transportation
These statewide average collision rates (expected rates) which vary based on the roadway types are compared with the collision rates on the study segments to evaluate the safety issues. The results of the collision analysis showing calculated collision rate per segment are presented in Table 4.

Table 4 shows that 34 out of 44 segments have collision rates that exceed those of the expected collision rates.

11.a
Packet Pg. 488
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

12 Table 4: Collision Data per Segments
STREET LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
ADT1
(VEH/DAY)
NO. OF
COLLISIONS2

SPEEDING
COLLISIONS3

EXPECTED
(C/MVM)4

CALCULATED
(C/MVM)5

1. AGUA MANSA ROAD S. Riverside Avenue S. Rancho Avenue 2.3 9,002 15 4 1.08 0.50

2. BARTON ROAD Washington Street South City Boundary 0.44 16,352 15 7 1.08 1.43

3. BARTON ROAD S. La Cadena Drive E. City Limits (UPRR) 0.22 9,519 2 0 1.08 0.65

4. "C" STREET N. Rancho Avenue Colton Avenue 1.1 4,923 13 2 1.08 1.64

5. COLTON AVENUE North City limit (Lytle
Cajon Channel) E."E" Street 0.93 7,688 11 0 1.08 1.05

6. CENTER STREET S. Riverside Avenue /
Main Street S. City Limits 0.75 5,124 0 0 1.08 0.00

7. COOLEY DRIVE E. Cooley Lane Washington Street 0.5 9,076 13 3 1.33 1.96

8. COOLEY DRIVE S. Mount Vernon Avenue E. Cooley Lane 1.5 7,163 25 7 1.33 1.59

9. EUCALYPTUS AVENUE W. Randall Avenue San Bernardino Avenue 0.5 3,146 11 1 1.08 4.79

10. FAIRWAY DRIVE N. Mount Vernon Avenue Auto Center Road 0.8 8,307 30 4 1.08 3.09

11. HUNTS LANE W. Redlands Boulevard Washington Street 0.9 9,745 20 3 0.86 1.56

12. LA CADENA DRIVE N. Mount Vernon Avenue N. 8th Street 0.6 3,966 9 1 1.33 2.59

13. LA CADENA DRIVE N. 8th Street Valley Boulevard 0.9 3,274 37 3 1.08 8.60

14. LA CADENA DRIVE Valley Boulevard BNSF Railroad Overpass 0.8 16,483 26 3 0.86 1.35

15. LA CADENA DRIVE BNSF Railroad Overpass S. City Limits 2.2 21,930 28 4 1.33 0.40

16. LAUREL STREET Grand Avenue Pennsylvania Avenue 0.6 3,196 6 0 1.08 2.14

17. LAUREL STREET Pennsylvania Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue 0.76 3,651 11 0 1.08 2.72

18. "M" STREET S. La Cadena Drive Mount Vernon Avenue 0.8 4,039 15 5 1.08 3.18

19. MERIDIAN AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard 1.1 7,921 13 3 1.08 1.02

20. MILL STREET N. Rancho Avenue BNSF Railroad Overpass 0.58 13,127 30 2 1.08 2.70

21. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE Johnston Street E. Citrus Street / Grant
Avenue 0.26 13,178 11 2 0.86 2.20

22. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
E. Citrus Street/ Grant
Avenue E. Valley Boulevard 1.35 11,298 59 9 0.86 2.65

11.a
Packet Pg. 489
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02- 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

13 STREET LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
ADT1
(VEH/DAY)
NO. OF
COLLISIONS2

SPEEDING
COLLISIONS3

EXPECTED
(C/MVM)4

CALCULATED
(C/MVM)5

23. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE E. Valley Boulevard Cooley Drive 1 20,447 19 8 1.08 0.64

24. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE Cooley Drive Washington Street 0.44 9,704 19 6 1.33 3.05

25. CITRUS STREET Teresa Avenue Rancho Avenue 0.46 2,798 8 2 1.08 4.26

26. OLIVE STREET Meridian Avenue Railroad 1.36 3,980 13 1 1.08 1.65

27. OLIVE STREET N. Rancho Avenue N. La Cadena Drive 0.7 3,266 15 0 1.08 4.49

28. PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard 1.7 4,315 15 1 1.08 1.40

29. PEPPER AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard 1 22,928 59 18 1.08 1.76

30. RANCHO AVENUE N. City Limit Mill Street 0.9 8,000 15 0 0.86 1.43

31. RANCHO AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard 1.6 17,529 74 14 0.86 1.81

32. RANCHO AVENUE Agua Mansa Road S. La Cadena Drive 0.4 10,470 14 4 0.86 2.29

33. RANCHO AVENUE W. Valley Boulevard Agua Mansa Road 1.07 17,061 26 9 0.86 0.98

34. RECHE CANYON ROAD Washington Street S. City Limit 2 28,007 41 15 1.08 0.50

35. RIVERSIDE AVENUE Agua Mansa Road Placentia Lane 1.35 23,482 16 5 0.86 0.35

36. RV CENTER DRIVE 600 E Washington Street 1000 E Washington Street 0.6 1,805 8 1 1.08 5.06

37. SAN BERNARDINO
AVENUE N. Pepper Avenue Meridian Avenue 0.25 5,969 37 7 1.08 16.98

38. SAN BERNARDINO
AVENUE N. Sycamore Avenue N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 10,748 43 7 1.08 3.70

39. VALLEY BOULEVARD W. City Limits N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 9,515 25 3 0.86 2.43

40. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Pepper Avenue N. Rancho Avenue 1.02 11,709 30 6 0.86 1.72

41. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Rancho Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue 1.27 10,182 64 13 1.33 3.39

42. WASHINGTON STREET West End S. Mount Vernon Avenue 0.93 4,591 13 2 1.33 2.09

43. WASHINGTON STREET S. Mount Vernon Avenue Reche Canyon Road 1.19 24,251 63 18 0.86 1.50

44. WASHINGTON STREET Reche Canyon Road Waterman Avenue 0.65 25,821 28 9 1.33 1.14 Notes:
(1) ADT: Average Daily Traffic (2) Number of Collisions (3) Number of speed-related collisions (4) Expected Collisions (C) per Million Vehicles Miles (MVM) (5) Calculated Collision Rate

11.a
Packet Pg. 490
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02- 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

14 Analysis
Data Analysis
This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to establish prima facie speed limits for 44 surveyed roadway segments in the City of Colton, based on a thorough evaluation of the collected data and standard speed zoning practice. Prima Facie speed limits serve to advise drivers and law enforcement of what is the reasonable and prudent speed under normal conditions.

The starting criteria used to recommend the speed limit is the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed. Consideration is then given to the conditions that might cause a change in the speed limit such as above-average collision rates, land use characteristics, pedestrian activity, the 10-mph pace, and roadway conditions that might not be readily apparent to road users, among others.

Table 5 summarizes the speed zone analysis for the roadway segments under consideration.

The following section summarizes the results and recommendations.

11.a
Packet Pg. 491
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

15 Table 5: Speed Zoning Analysis

STREET NAME

SEGMENT LIMITS ROAD CHARACTERISTICS SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
NO.

OF
LANES
CLASS
[A]
10-MPH
PACE
(MPH)
% IN 10-
MPH
PACE
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
POSTED
SPEED
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

SPEED (MPH)

1. AGUA MANSA ROAD S. Riverside Avenue S. Rancho Avenue 2.3 2 MA 41-50 87% 49.2 45 45

2. BARTON ROAD Washington Street South City Boundary
Limits

0.44 2 MA 43-52 78% 51.4 50 50

3. BARTON ROAD S. La Cadena Drive E. City limits (UPRR) 0.22 2 MA 39-48 67% 47.9 45 45

4. "C" STREET N. Rancho Avenue Colton Avenue 1.1 2 CO 25-34 75% 33.7 30 30

5. COLTON AVENUE North City limit
(LYTLE Cajon
Channel)
E."E" Street 0.93 2 MA 30-39 92% 38.8 40 40

6. CENTER STREET S. Riverside
Avenue/Main Street
S. City Limits 0.75 2 MA 36-45 74% 42.8 40 40

7. COOLEY DRIVE E. Cooley Lane Washington Street 0.5 4 MA 28-37 77% 38.6 35 35

8. COOLEY DRIVE S. Mount Vernon
Avenue
E. Cooley Lane 1.5 4 MA 34-43 71% 44 40 40

9. EUCALYPTUS
AVENUE
W. Randall Avenue San Bernardino
Avenue

0.5 2 CO 24-33 84% 32.9 30 30

10. FAIRWAY DRIVE N. Mount Vernon
Avenue
Auto Center Road 0.8 2 SA 30-39 68% 40.9 35 35 [B]

11. HUNTS LANE W. Redlands
Boulevard
Washington Street 0.9 4 SA 32-41 51% 44.4 40 40

12. LA CADENA DRIVE N. Mount Vernon
Avenue
N. 8th Street 0.6 4 MA 29-38 89% 37.2 35 35

13. LA CADENA DRIVE N. 8th Street Valley Boulevard 0.9 2 MA 28-37 82% 35.5 35 35

14. LA CADENA DRIVE Valley Boulevard BNSF Railroad
Overpass

0.8 4 MA 37-46 58% 49.8 45 45

15. LA CADENA DRIVE BNSF Railroad
Overpass
S. City Limits 2.2 4 MA 46-55 74% 55.9 50 50 [C]

16. LAUREL STREET Grand Avenue Pennsylvania Avenue 0.6 2 CO 31-40 80% 39.7 35 35

17. LAUREL STREET Pennsylvania Avenue N. Mount Vernon
Avenue

0.76 2 CO 27-36 79% 38.1 35 35

11.a
Packet Pg. 492
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02- 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

16 STREET NAME

SEGMENT LIMITS ROAD CHARACTERISTICS SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
NO.

OF
LANES
CLASS
[A]
10-MPH
PACE
(MPH)
% IN 10-
MPH
PACE
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
POSTED
SPEED
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

SPEED (MPH)

18. "M" STREET S. La Cadena Drive Mount Vernon
Avenue

0.8 2 CO 32-41 72% 43.5 40 40

19. MERIDIAN AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard 1.1 2 CO 34-43 80% 42.9 40 40

20. MILL STREET N. Rancho Avenue BNSF Railroad
Overpass

0.58 2 MA 34-43 65% 42.7 40 40

21. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
Johnston Street E. Citrus Street /
Grant Avenue

0.26 4 MA 20-29 86% 28.3 25 25

22. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
E. Citrus Street/
Grant Avenue
E. Valley Boulevard 1.35 4 MA 32-41 68% 46.1 40 40 [D]

23. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
E. Valley Boulevard Cooley Drive 1 2 MA 29-38 77% 39.3 35 35

24. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
Cooley Drive Washington Street 0.44 4 MA 30-39 69% 39.4 35 35

25. CITRUS STREET Teresa Avenue Rancho Avenue 0.46 2 CO 27-36 77% 35.1 25 25

26. OLIVE STREET Meridian Avenue Railroad 1.36 2 MA 24-33 77% 31.9 30 30

27. OLIVE STREET N. Rancho Avenue N. La Cadena Drive 0.7 2 SA 21-30 74% 31.6 25 25 [E]

28. PENNSYLVANIA
AVENUE
Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard 1.7 2 CO 27-36 77% 37.7 35 35

29. PEPPER AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard 1 3 MA 39-48 50% 49.9 45 45 [F]

30. RANCHO AVENUE N. City Limit Mill Street 0.9 4 MA 34-43 64% 43.5 40 40

31. RANCHO AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard 1.6 4 MA 31-40 66% 43.8 35 35 [G]

32. RANCHO AVENUE Agua Mansa Road S. La Cadena Drive 0.4 4 MA 42-51 83% 51.1 45 45 [H]

33. RANCHO AVENUE W. Valley Boulevard Agua Mansa Road 1.07 4 MA 44-53 70% 50.7 45 45 [I]

34. RECHE CANYON
ROAD
Washington Street S. City Limit 2 2 MA 42-51 80% 50.5 45 45 [J]

35. RIVERSIDE AVENUE Agua Mansa Road Placentia Lane 1.35 4 MA 43-52 69% 54.4 50 50

11.a
Packet Pg. 493
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02- 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

17 STREET NAME

SEGMENT LIMITS ROAD CHARACTERISTICS SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
NO.

OF
LANES
CLASS
[A]
10-MPH
PACE
(MPH)
% IN 10-
MPH
PACE
85TH

PERCENTILE

SPEED (MPH)
POSTED
SPEED
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

SPEED (MPH)

36. RV CENTER DRIVE 600 E Washington
Street
1000 E Washington
Street

0.6 2 CO 21-30 82% 30.5 25 25 [K]

37. SAN BERNARDINO
AVE
N. Pepper Avenue Meridian Avenue 0.25 2 MA 33-42 87% 39.8 35 35 [L]

38. SAN BERNARDINO
AVENUE
N. Sycamore Avenue N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 2 MA 35-44 86% 43.2 40 40

39. VALLEY BOULEVARD W. City Limits N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 4 MA 39-48 74% 48.5 45 45

40. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Pepper Avenue N. Rancho Avenue 1.02 4 MA 41-50 82% 49.8 45 45

41. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Rancho Avenue N. Mount Vernon
Avenue

1.27 4 MA 26-35 65% 37.5 35 35

42. WASHINGTON
STREET
West End S. Mount Vernon
Avenue

0.93 4 MA 28-37 82% 37.3 35 35

43. WASHINGTON
STREET
S. Mount Vernon
Avenue
Reche Canyon Road 1.19 4 MA 36-45 85% 44.7 40 40

44. WASHINGTON
STREET
Reche Canyon Road Waterman Avenue 0.65 4 MA 33-42 78% 43.5 40 40 Notes:

A. Classification Per City of Colton General Plan Mobility Element: MA= Major Arterial; SA= Secondary Arterial; CO= Collector B. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to higher-than-expected collision rate.

C. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to the presence of an uncontrolled crosswalk, several driveways, and several collisions attributed to speeding.

D. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to the presence of various pedestrian crossings along the corridor and higher-than-expected collision rate.

E. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to higher-than-expected collision rate.

F. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to the presence of various institutions (middle school, hospital, medical center, etc.) and higher-than-expected collision rate.

G. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to the presence of Colton High School, higher-than-expected collision rate, and multiple uncontrolled pedestrian crossings.

H. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to higher-than-expected collision rate, consistency with adjacent segments, and truck traffic/driveways.

I. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to due to the closely spaced signalized intersections, the roadway classification, the horizontal curvature, the truck traffic turning across center two- way left turn median, and the higher-than-expected collision rate with a third of collisions attributed to speeding.

J. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed to ensure consistency with the posted speed of the segment within the County of Riverside and due to that several collisions are attributed to speeding.

K. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due the presence of horizontal curves and an RV park with various RVs accessing the park.

L. Recommended to maintain existing posted speed due to the presence a of two-way left-turn central lane, a vertical curve and hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers.

11.a
Packet Pg. 494
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02- 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

18 Results and Recommendations
The preliminary results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey reveal that the currently posted speed limits will not change and will remain as documented to allow for continued radar enforcement until the renewal of the posted speeds during the next validation of the Engineering and Traffic Survey.

Below are brief summaries presenting the justification for retaining the existing speed limits for various segments as part of this Engineering and Traffic Survey update for the City of Colton, including radar speed survey results, collision rates, review of existing conditions, and comments regarding evidence of any significant roadway and traffic factors not readily apparent to drivers.

Segment 1- Agua Mansa Road from S Riverside Avenue to S Rancho Avenue This section of Agua Mesa Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial, and vacant land. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted in an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.2 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 41-50.

To ensure consistency with adjacent segment speed limits in the City of Rialto and given the presence of warehouses with truck traffic and curves that can potentially impact sight distances, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.

Segment 3- Barton Road from S La Cadena Drive to E City Limit This section of Barton Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial, and vacant land. An uncontrolled crosswalk is located at S Terrace Avenue. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 47.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 39-48.

Due to the presence of uncontrolled crosswalk, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.

Segment 4- C Street from N Rancho Avenue to Colton Avenue This section of C Street is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are mainly residential.

Curbside parking is permitted on both sides of C Street. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 33.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 25-34. It is noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows higher value of 1.64 MVM compared to the expected 1.08 MVM, which when coupled with the residential land uses and the underpass makes the present speed limit more prudent than a higher speed. It is recommended that existing 30 mph speed limit be maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.

11.a
Packet Pg. 495
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

19 Segment 5- Colton Avenue from N City Limit to E Street This section of road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 30-39. North side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of City of San Bernardino and is currently posted at 40 mph. To maintain consistency throughout Colton Road, it is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit is maintained.

Segment 6- Center Street from S Riverside Avenue to S City Limit This section of road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are mostly industrial or vacant. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 42.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 36-

45. South side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of City of Riverside, are currently posted at 40 mph. In order to maintain consistency, it is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.

Segment 7- Cooley Drive from E Cooley Lane to Washington Street This section of road is a four-lane divided roadway with bike lanes on both sides. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. An Elementary school is located within this segment. An uncontrolled crosswalk is located at E Old Ranch Road. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.6 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 28-37. With the presence of bike lane, an uncontrolled crosswalk and a school, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.

Segment 8- Cooley Drive from S Mt. Vernon Avenue to E Cooley Lane This section of road is a two-lane divided roadway with bike lanes between E Cooley Lane and north of E Via Venita and a four-lane divided roadway with bike lanes and curbside parking for the remining section till S Mt Vernon Avenue. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 34-43. The high collision rate as well as the presence of sharp horizontal curves, curbside parking, truck traffic and bicycle traffic makes the existing 35 mph the prudent speed limit.

Segment 9- Eucalyptus Avenue from W Randall Avenue to San Bernardino Ave This section of road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 32.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 24-33. An Elementary school and a middle school are located within this segment. Due to the presence of schools, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 30 mph speed limit is maintained.

11.a
Packet Pg. 496
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

20 Segment 10- Fairway Drive from N. Mount Vernon Avenue to Auto Center Road This section of Fairway Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential, and vacant land. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 40.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 30-39. The 10-mph pace range of 30 to 39 mph with 68% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85 th percentile speed of 40.9 mph. It is also noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows much higher value of 3.09 MVM compared to the expected 1.08 MVM. It is recommended that existing speed 35 mph speed limit be maintained (CVC 22358.8) due to above reasons.

Segment 11- Hunts Lane from W Redlands Blvd to Washington Street This section of Fairway Drive is a four-lane roadway in shared jurisdiction with the City of San Bernardino. The adjacent land uses are residential, commercial. The existing speed limit on this segment per the City’s 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey is 40 mph. However, the posted speed limit is 45 mph going northbound which to our understanding is in the City of San Bernardino. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of

44.4 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 32-41. It is recommended to maintain consistency between the two agencies. Given the higher-than-expected collision rates (over 10% of which are attributed to speeding), it is recommended speed limit of 40 mph be posted.

Segment 14- La Cadena Drive from Valley Blvd to BNSF Railroad Overpass This section of La Cadena Drive is mostly a four-lane undivided roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. An Elementary school is located within this segment and an uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk at O Street. In addition, several commercial and residential driveways front La Cadena Drive. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 37- 46 mph with 58% of drivers within that pace. Due to the presence of driveways and several cross streets there is a potential for unexpected crossing, stopping, and turning vehicular traffic. With the school, crosswalk, and numerous driveways, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 15- La Cadena Drive from BNSF Railroad Overpass to S. City Limits This section of La Cadena Drive is mostly a four-lane roadway with a two-way left-turn lane. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial, and vacant land. This segment has an uncontrolled crosswalk at Fogg Street. The existing posted speed limit is 50 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 55.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 46 - 55mph. With 14% of the collisions attributed to speeding, and the presence of an uncontrolled crosswalk and several driveways, it is recommended that existing 50 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 16- Laurel Street from Grand Avenue to Pennsylvania Avenue

11.a
Packet Pg. 497
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

21 This section of road is a two-lane roadway. Curb-side parking is permitted along both sides of this segment. The adjacent land use is residential. A middle school is located within the segment. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 31-40. With a residential street typology, a higher-than-expected collision rate, and presence of a school, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 17- Laurel Street from Pennsylvania Avenue to N Mt Vernon Avenue This section of road is a two-lane roadway. Curb-side parking is permitted along both sides of this segment. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph with a 25 mph speed posted on both sides of the railroad underpass. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 27 - 36 with 79% of vehicles within this pace driving below the 85 th percentile speed. With a higher-than-expected collision rate, the current pace, and the presence of numerous driveways, it is prudent to retain the existing 35 mph speed limit.

Segment 18- M Street from S La Cadena Drive to Mt Vernon Avenue This section of road is a two-lane roadway with curb-side parking permitted along both sides of this segment between La Cadena Drive and Fogg Street. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 32-41 with 72% indicating that a large majority of drivers driving the below 85th percentile speed. Given the above, and the presence of on-street parking, a higher-than-expected collision rate, and residential driveways a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit is maintained.

Segment 19- Meridian Avenue from W Randall Avenue to W Valley Blvd This section of Meridian Avenue is a two-lane roadway with a two-way left-turn lane with an uncontrolled crosswalk located at W Poema Drive intersection. Bike lanes are provided between San Bernardino Avenue and Valley Boulevard. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. An elementary school, a university medical center (California University of Science and Medicine center) and a hospital (Arrowhead Medical Center) is located within this segment.

The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 42.9 mph. It is recommended that speed limit remain 40 mph due to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle uses associated with the noted institutions along the roadway segment.

Segment 20- Mill Street from N Rancho Ave to BNSF Railroad Overpass This section of Mill Street is a two-lane undivided roadway with curbside parking permitted on both sides. The adjacent land uses are primarily residential and commercial with numerous

11.a
Packet Pg. 498
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

22 driveways. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 42.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 34-43 mph. With the significantly higher-than-expected collision rate and the reduced sight distance on residential and commercial driveways associated with on-street parking, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 21- Mt Vernon Avenue from Johnston St to E Citrus St/Grand Ave This section of road is a four-lane roadway with abutting residential and commercial uses. San Bernardino Valley College is located along this segment. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 28.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 20-29 mph. It is noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows higher value of 2.20 MVM compared to the expected 0.86 MVM. Due to higher collision rate and presence of a college, lower speed limit is prudent. it is recommended that the existing 25 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 22- Mount Vernon Avenue from E. Citrus Street/ Grant Avenue to E. Valley Boulevard This section of road is a four-lane roadway with two-way left-turn lane. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential with various pedestrian crossings along the corridor. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 46.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 32- 41. It is noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows higher value of 2.65 MVM as compared to the expected 0.86 MVM. The 10-mph pace range of 32 to 41 mph with 68% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85th percentile speed of 46.1 mph. Given the above vehicular and pedestrian considerations, it is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 23- Mt Vernon Avenue from E. Valley Boulevard to Cooley Drive This section of road is a two-lane roadway and gradual horizontal and vertical curves. The adjacent land uses are mostly commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 29-38 mph. The 10-mph pace range of 29 to 38 mph with 77% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85 th percentile speed of 39.3 mph. In addition, other considerations include horizontal curves (and associated sight distances), closely spaced signalized intersections, and an undivided narrow roadway over the railroad grade crossing and storm channels. As such a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 24- Mt Vernon Avenue from Cooley Drive to E Washington Street This section of road is a six-lane divided roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and vacant land. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey

11.a
Packet Pg. 499
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

23 resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.4 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 30-39 mph. With a higher-than-expected collision rate and 32% of collisions attributed to speeding, it is prudent to maintain the existing speed limit.

Segment 25- Citrus Street from Teresa Avenue to Rancho Avenue This section of road is a four-lane roadway with curb-side parking permitted along both sides.

The adjacent land use is mostly residential, and the existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 35.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 27-36. The calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows much higher value of 4.26 MVM compared to the expected one 1.08 MVM with 25% of the collisions being speeding related. Besides, this segment has reduced sight distance concerns at residential driveways attributed on-street parking. As such, it is recommended that the existing 25 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 27- Olive Street from N. Rancho Avenue to N. La Cadena Drive This section of road is a two-lane roadway with abutting residential uses. Ulysses Elementary School is located between N 2 nd street and N Terrace Avenue on Olive Street. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 31.6 mph with a 10-mph pace range of 21-30 with 74% of drivers within that pace (below the 85 th percentile speed). It is also noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows much higher value of 4.49 MVM compared to the expected one 1.08 MVM. The recommended speed limit is 25 mph due to the presence of a school and high collision rates.

Segment 28- Pennsylvania Avenue from Mill Street to Valley Boulevard This section of road is a two-lane undivided roadway with curb-side parking along both sides.

The adjacent land uses are primarily residential and commercial, and the existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 37.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 27-36. With the higher-than-expected collision rate, 77% of vehicles within the 10-mph pace driving below the 85 th percentile speed, and reduced sight distance on residential and commercial driveways caused by on-street parking, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 29- Pepper Avenue from Randall Avenue to W Valley Boulevard This section of Pepper Avenue is a three-lane roadway between Randall Avenue and San Bernardino Avenue and four-lane divided roadway between San Bernardino Avenue and W Valley Boulevard. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. A middle school (Jehue Middle School), a university medical center (California University of Science and Medicine center) and a hospital (Arrowhead Medical Center) are located within this segment. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 39-48. It is recommended that speed limit

11.a
Packet Pg. 500
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

24 remain 45 mph due to the presence of the above noted institutions and a higher-than-expected collision rate.

Segment 30- Rancho Avenue from N City Limit to Mill Street This section of road is a four-lane roadway with curb-side parking permitted along both sides.

The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential, and the existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 34-43. With higher-than-expected collision rates coupled with reduced sight distance caused by on-street parking around the residential and commercial driveways, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit is maintained.

Segment 31- Rancho Avenue from Mill Street to W. Valley Boulevard This section of road is a four-lane roadway with a posted bike route with abutting commercial and residential land uses. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 31-40. Colton High School is located on the east side and school stadium is located on the west side of Rancho Avenue between W Valley Boulevard and W E Street. Multiple uncontrolled pedestrian crossings exist along the corridor. With the high amount of pedestrian crossings/traffic, the higher-than-expected crash rates, and the presence of a school, it is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 32- Rancho Avenue from Agua Mansa Road to S La Cadena Drive This section of road is a four-lane roadway with adjacent commercial land uses. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 51.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 42-51. This segment has a higher-than-expected collision rate with 29% of the collisions attributed to speeding. It is recommended to maintain the existing 45 mph speed limit due to truck driveways along curve and to ensure consistency with the proposed speed zone on adjacent segment north of Agua Mansa Road.

Segment 33- Rancho Avenue from W Valley Boulevard to Agua Mansa Road This section of road is a four-lane roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. The adjacent land uses are commercial, residential, and vacant land. The traffic and engineering survey resulted in an 85th percentile speed limit of 50.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 44-53.

However, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained due to the closely spaced signalized intersections, the classification as a Pedestrian Street north of N Street, the horizontal curvature, the truck traffic turning across center two way left turn median, and the higher-than-expected collision rate with 35% of collisions attributed to speeding.

Segment 34- Reche Canyon Road from Washington Street to S. City Limit

11.a
Packet Pg. 501
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

25 This section of road is a two-lane roadway with adjacent residential and vacant land uses. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 50.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 42-51.

South side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of County of Riverside, and is currently posted at 45 mph. With 37% of the collisions attributed to speeding and in order to maintain consistency throughout Reche Canyon Road, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 35- Riverside Avenue from Agua Mansa Road to Placentia Lane This section of road is a four-lane roadway with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The adjacent land uses are commercial and vacant land. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 54.4 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 43-52. South side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of County of Riverside, and currently posted at 50 mph.

Moreover, the collision rates are higher than expected with 31% of crashes attributed to speeding. As such, it is recommended that existing 50 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 36- RV Center Dr from 600 E Washington St to 1000 E Washington St This section of road is a two-lane roadway with curbside parking permitted on both sides. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial, and the existing posted speed limit is 25 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 30.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 21-30. With various RVs accessing the RV park and the horizontal curves, it is recommended that existing 25 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 37- San Bernardino Ave from N Pepper Avenue to Meridian Avenue This section of road has two through lanes and a two-way left-turn central lane. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 33-42. However due to the presence a of two-way left-turn central lane, a vertical curve and hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is recommended. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit is maintained.

Segment 38- San Bernardino Ave from N Sycamore Ave to N. Pepper Avenue This section of road has four through lanes between Sycamore Avenue and Indigo Avenue and two through lanes between Indigo Avenue and Pepper Avenue. A bike lane is provided for westbound direction. The adjacent land uses are residential and vacant land, and the existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.2 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 35-44. With higher-than-expected collision rates as well as the presence of bike travelers and multi-modal route typology, it is recommended that 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 39- Valley Boulevard from W City Limit to Pepper Avenue

11.a
Packet Pg. 502
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton

26 This section of road has four through lanes and a two-way left-turn central lane. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The adjacent land uses are commercial. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 48.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 39-48.

With heavy truck traffic turning across multiple lanes and higher-than-expected collision rates, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 40- Valley Boulevard from Pepper Avenue to Rancho Avenue This section of road consists of four through lanes and a two-way left-turn central lane. It has a posted speed limit of 45 mph and abuts commercial land uses. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 41-

50. With heavy truck traffic (due to the presence of a truck rental facility) and a two-way left- turn central lane there is a potential for unexpected crossing, stopping, and turning vehicular traffic. As a lower speed limit is prudent, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit is maintained.

Segment 43- Washington Street from S Mt Vernon Ave to Reche Canyon Rd This section of road has four through lanes and one two-way left-turn central lane. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 44.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 36-45. With closely spaced signalized intersections, bicycle street designation, and a higher-than-expected collision rate, it is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit be maintained.

Segment 44 - Washington Street from Reche Canyon Rd to S Waterman Ave This section of road is four-lane divided roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 33-42. The 10-mph pace range of 33 to 42 mph with 78% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85th percentile speed of 43.5 mph. Due to above as well as closely spaced signalized intersections and the consistency with adjacent posted speed limit zones, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit is maintained.

.

11.a
Packet Pg. 503
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23)

Appendix A: Speed Survey Summary Sheets

11.a
Packet Pg. 504
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Agua Mansa Road
1 S. Riverside Avenue - S. Rancho Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

2.3 2 Lane (Urban)
25 - 75 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at Riverside Avenue and Rancho Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
9002
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 87%

1.08 15

3.75 0.50
4 27%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 12:43 P.M.
104
41 - 50

45.7 49.2
45 consistency with adjacent City of Rialto; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 505
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Barton Road
2 Washington Street- S. City Limits
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.44 2 Lane (Urban)
32 - 75 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Washington Street
2- Traffic Volumes
16352
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 78%

1.08 15

3.75 1.43
7 47%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 10:06 A.M.
102
43-52

47.2 51.4
50 closest to the 85th percentile speed
50 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 506
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Barton Road
3 S. La Cadena Drive - E City Limits
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.22 2 Lane (Urban)
25 - 58 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at S. La Cadena Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
9519
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 67%

1.08 2

0.50 0.65
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 9:02 A.M.
106
39-48

42.4 47.9
45 consistency with adjacent City of Rialto; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 507
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
"C" Street
4 N. Rancho Avenue - Colton Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.1 2 Lane (Urban)
40 - 65 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at N. Rancho Avenue and Stop at Colton
Avenue, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th and Pennsylvania
Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
4923
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 75%

1.08 13

3.25 1.64
2 15%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 9:58 A.M.
106
25-34

29.2 33.7
30 consistency with adjacent City of Rialto; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain
previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
30 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 508
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

35.5 38.8
40 Consistency with adjacent jurisdiction; retain previous speed limit.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
92%

1.08 11

2.75 1.05
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 10:12 A.M.
103
30-39
2 Lane (Urban)
42 - 50 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at Mount Vernon Avenue and N. Fairview Avenue; 3 Stops at E. "E" Street, E. "C" Street and Coburn Street 2- Traffic Volumes
7688
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Colton Avenue
5 N. City Limit - E. "E" Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.93 11.a
Packet Pg. 509
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Center Street
6 S. Riverside Avenue- S. City Limits
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.75 2 Lane (Urban)
24 - 44 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Stop at S. Riverside Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
5124
2/24/2022
3-Collision History
4 74%

1.08 0

0.00 0.00
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 1:55 P.M.
101
36-45

38.2 42.8
40 Consistency with adjacent jurisdiction; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 510
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Cooley Drive
7 E. Cooley Lane - Washington Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.5 4L/Divided (Urban)
80 - 93 Feet
4 Divided
1 Signal at E. Washington Street and 2 Stops at Ashwood lane and E. Cooley Lane
2- Traffic Volumes
9076
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 77%

1.33 13

3.25 1.96
3 23%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 11:04 A.M.
104
28-37

33.4 38.6
35 presence of bike lane, an uncontrolled crosswalk and a school; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 511
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Cooley Drive
8 S. Mount Vernon Avenue - E. Cooley Lane
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.5 4L/Divided (Urban)
94 - 118 Feet
4 Divided
1 Signal at Mount Vernon Avenue and 1 Stop at E.

Cooley Lane
2- Traffic Volumes
7163
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 71%

1.33 25

6.25 1.59
7 28%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 1:15 P.M.
103
34-43

38.3 44
40 high collision rate; bike lanes and truck traffic; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain
previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 512
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

29.2 32.9
30 middle and elementary school; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit
per CVC 22358.8.
30 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
84%

1.08 11

2.75 4.79
1 9%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 12:46 P.M.
101
24-33
2 Lane (Urban)
47 Feet
2 Undivided
4 Stops at Randall Avenue, Admiralty Street, De
Carmen Drive and San Bernardino Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
3146
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Eucalyptus Avenue
9 W. Randall Avenue- San Bernardino Avenue
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.5 11.a
Packet Pg. 513
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

35.8 40.9
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
68%

1.08 30

7.50 3.09
4 13%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 9:10 A.M.
100
30-39
2 Lane (Urban)
30 - 60 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Mount Vernon Avenue; 2 Stops at Sperry Drive and Auto Plaza Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
8307
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Secondary Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Fairway Drive
10 N. Mount Vernon Avenue- Auto Center Road
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.8 11.a
Packet Pg. 514
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

37.3 44.4
40 high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
51%

0.86 20

5.00 1.56
3 15%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 12:05 P.M.
101
32-41
4L/Undivided (Urban)
62 - 68 Feet
4 Undivided
4 Signals at Redlands Boulevard, Oliver Holmes Road, E.

Cooley Lane and Washington Street.
2- Traffic Volumes
9745
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 Secondary Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Hunts Lane
11 W. Redlands Boulevard - Washington Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.9 11.a
Packet Pg. 515
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

33.7 37.2
35 Closest to the 85th percentile speed
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
89%

1.33 9

2.25 2.59
1 11%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 11:05 A.M.
101
29-38
4L/Divided (Urban)
75-86 Feet
4 Divided
2 Signals at Mount Vernon Avenue and Bordwell Avenue; 1 Stop at 8th Street
2- Traffic Volumes
3966
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
12 N. Mount Vernon Avenue - N. 8th Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.6 11.a
Packet Pg. 516
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

31.4 35.5
35 closest to the 85th percentile speed
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
82%

1.08 37

9.25 8.60
3 8%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 11:10 A.M.
103
28-37
2 Lane (Urban)
50 - 62 Feet
2 Undivided
5 Signals at Olive Street, C Street, G Street, H Street and Valley Boulevard; 2 Stops at E Street and F Street
2- Traffic Volumes
3274
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
13 N. 8th Street - Valley Boulevard
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.9 11.a
Packet Pg. 517
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

44.1 49.8
45 School and uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain
previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
58%

0.86 26

6.50 1.35
3 12%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 10:15 A.M.
108
37-46
4L/Undivided (Urban)
38 - 78 Feet
4 Undivided
3 Signals at Valley Boulevard, N Street and Maple
Street
2- Traffic Volumes
16483
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
14 Valley Boulevard - BNSF Railroad Overpass
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.8 11.a
Packet Pg. 518
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

49.6 55.9
50 uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
50 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
74%

1.33 28

7.00 0.40
4 14%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 9:43 A.M.
105
46-55
4L/Divided (Urban)
60 - 100 Feet
4 Divided
1 Signal at Barton Road; 1 Stop at Lowa Street
2- Traffic Volumes
21930
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
15 BNSF Railroad Overpass - S. City Limits
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

2.2 11.a
Packet Pg. 519
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

35.2 39.7
35 middle school; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
80%

1.08 6

1.50 2.14
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 2:16 P.M.
100
31-40
2 Lane (Urban)
40 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Rancho Avenue; 2 Stops at Grand Avenue and
Norman Road
2- Traffic Volumes
3196
3/2/2022
3-Collision History
4 Grand Avenue - Pennsylvania Avenue
Collector
1- Roadway Conditions

0.6 EB/WB
16 City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Laurel Street

11.a
Packet Pg. 520
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

33.2 38.1
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
79%

1.08 11

2.75 2.72
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 1:15 P.M.
101
27-36
2 Lane (Urban)
40 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at N. La Cadena Drive; 1 Stop at Pennsylvania
Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
3651
3/2/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Laurel Street
17 Pennsylvania Avenue - N. Mount Vernon Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.76 11.a
Packet Pg. 521
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

38.5 43.5
40 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
72%

1.08 15

3.75 3.18
5 33%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 9:05 A.M.
100
32-41
2 Lane (Urban)
45 - 65 feet
2 Undivided
Signal at Mount Vernon Avenue and S. La Cadena Drive; 2 Stops at S. La Cadena Drive and 9th Street
2- Traffic Volumes
4039
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
"M" Street
18 S. La Cadena Drive - Mount Vernon Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.8 11.a
Packet Pg. 522
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

38.8 42.9
40 high collision rate; various isntituions and uncontrolled crosswalk; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections
22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
80%

1.08 13

3.25 1.02
3 23%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 10:05 A.M.
105
34-43
2 Lane (Urban)
48 Feet
2 Undivided
3 Stops at Randall Avenue, Olive Street and Valley
Boulevard
2- Traffic Volumes
7921
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Meridian Avenue
19 Randall Avenue - W. Valley Boulevard
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.1 11.a
Packet Pg. 523
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

37.2 42.7
40 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
65%

1.08 30

7.50 2.70
2 7%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 1:27 P.M.
107
34-43
2 Lane (Urban)
35 - 56 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at Rancho Avenue and Pennsylvania Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
13127
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Mill Street
20 N. Rancho - BNSF Railroad Overpass
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.58 11.a
Packet Pg. 524
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

24.9 28.3
25 high collision rate; college; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
25 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
86%

0.86 11

2.75 2.20
2 18%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 2/23/2022 12:12 P.M.
100
20-29
4L/Undivided (Urban)
62 Feet
4 Undivided
2 Signals at Johnston Street and E. Citrus Street
2- Traffic Volumes
13178
3/2/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Mount Vernon Avenue
21 Johnston Street - E. Citrus Street/ Grant Avenue
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.26 11.a
Packet Pg. 525
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

39.7 46.1
40 high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
68%

0.86 59

14.75 2.65
9 15%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 9:06 A.M.
105
32-41
4L/Undivided (Urban)
63 Feet
4 Undivided
7 Signals at E. Grant Avenue, Olive Street, Ped
Crossing, Colton Avenue, D Street, F Street and Valley
Boulevard
2- Traffic Volumes
11298
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Mount Vernon Avenue
22 E. Citrus Street/ Grant Avenue - E. Valley Blvd
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.35 11.a
Packet Pg. 526
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

34.5 39.3
35 10-mph pace; horizontal curves; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
77%

1.08 19

4.75 0.64
8 42%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 1:45 P.M.
101
29-38
2 Lane (Urban)
27 - 92 Feet
2 Undivided
4 Signals at Valley Boulevard, ramp, M Sreet and E.

Cooley Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
20447
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Mount Vernon Avenue
23 E. Valley Boulevard - Cooley Drive
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
1 11.a
Packet Pg. 527
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

34.4 39.4
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
69%

1.33 19

4.75 3.05
6 32%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 9:02 A.M.
104
30-39
4 L/Divided (Urban)
92 - 105 Feet
4 Divided
4 Signals at Cooley Drive, Santo Antonio Drive, Centerpoint Drive and E. Washington Street
2- Traffic Volumes
9704
4/7/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Mount Vernon Avenue
24 E. Cooley Drive - E. Washington Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.44 11.a
Packet Pg. 528
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

30.6 35.1
25 high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
25 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
77%

1.08 8

2.00 4.26
2 25%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 1:58 P.M.
107
27-36
2 Lane (Urban)
62 - 65 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Stops at N. Macy Avenue and N. Watwood Avenue; 1
Signal at N. Rancho Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
2798
4/7/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Citrus Street
25 N. Teresa Avenue - N. Rancho Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.46 11.a
Packet Pg. 529
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

27.4 31.9
30 closest to the 85th percentile speed
30 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
77%

1.08 13

3.25 1.65
1 8%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 12:28 P.M.
100
24-33
2 Lane (Urban)
28 - 42 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at N. Rancho Avenue; 1 Stop at Meridian Avenue 2- Traffic Volumes
3980
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Secondary Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Olive Street
26 N. Meridian Avenue- Railroad
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.36 11.a
Packet Pg. 530
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
27 31.6
25 high collision rate; elementary school; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
25 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
74%

1.08 15

3.75 4.49
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 9:42 A.M.
100
21-30
2 Lane (Urban)
38 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at N. Rancho Avenue and N. La Cadena Drive; 2 Stops at 2nd Street and Pennsylvania Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
3266
3/2/2022
3-Collision History
4 Secondary Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Olive Street
27 N. Rancho Avenue - N. La Cadena Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.7 11.a
Packet Pg. 531
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

33.2 37.7
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
77%

1.08 15

3.75 1.40
1 7%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 10:37 A.M.
100
27-36
2 Lane (Urban)
43 - 48 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Mill Street; 6 Stops at Johnston Street, Citrus Street, Laurel Street, Olive Street, C Street and W. Valley Boulevard
2- Traffic Volumes
4315
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Pennsylvania Avenue
28 Mill Street - W. Valley Boulevard
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.7 11.a
Packet Pg. 532
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

41.9 49.9
45 high collision rate; school and hospital; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain
previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
50%

1.08 59

14.75 1.76
18 31%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 1:35 P.M.
115
39-48
3 Lane (Urban)
70 - 100 Feet
3 Undivided
5 Signals at W. Randall Avenue, W. San Bernardino
Avenue, Violet Street, Blue Drive and W. Valley
Boulevard
2- Traffic Volumes
22928
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Pepper Avenue
29 W. Randall Avenue - W. Valley Boulevard
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
1 11.a
Packet Pg. 533
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date

38.4 43.5
40 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
64%

0.86 15

3.75 1.43
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 12:48 P.M.
107
34-43
4L/Undivided (Urban)
55 - 65 Feet
4 Undivided
2 Signals at Mill Street and Rialto Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
8000
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Rancho Avenue
30 N. City Limit - Mill Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.9 11.a
Packet Pg. 534
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Rancho Avenue
31 W. Mill Street - W. Valley Boulevard
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.6 4L/Undivided (Urban)
62 Feet
4 Undivided
7 Signals at Mill Street, Johnston Street, Citrus Street, Laurel Street, Olive Street, C Street and Valley
Boulevard
2- Traffic Volumes
17529
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 66%

0.86 74

18.50 1.81
14 19%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 12:20 P.M.
102
31-40
38 43.8
35 multiple uncontrolled pedestrian crossings; school; high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 535
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Rancho Avenue
32 Agua Mansa Road - S. La Cadena Drive
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.4 4L/Undivided (Urban)
62 - 64 Feet
4 Undivided
2 Signals at Agua Mansa Road and La Cadena Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
10470
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 83%

0.86 14

3.50 2.29
4 29%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 12:12 P.M.
101
42-51

47.3 51.1
45 high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 536
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Rancho Avenue
33 W. Valley Boulevard - Agua Mansa Road
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.07 4L/Undivided (Urban)
50 - 62 Feet
4 Undivided
4 Signals at Valley Boulevard, I-10 WB ramps, I-10 EB
ramps, Agua Mansa Rd.
2- Traffic Volumes
17061
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 70%

0.86 26

6.50 0.98
9 35%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 10:45 A.M.
100
44-53
46 50.7
45 high collision rate; closely-spaced signalized
intersections; pedestrian street north of N Street; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 537
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Reche Canyon Road
34 E. Washington Street - S. City Limit
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
2 2 Lane (Urban)
30 - 62 Feet
2 Undivided
4 Signals at Washington Street, Prado Lane, Topanga Ct
and Shane Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
28007
2/24/2022
3-Collision History
4 80%

1.08 41

10.25 0.50
15 37%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 12:15 P.M.
106
42-51
46 50.5
45 consistency with adjacent jurisdiction; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 538
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Riverside Avenue
35 Agua Mansa Road - Placentia Lane
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.35 4L/Undivided (Urban)
60-80 Feet
4 Undivided
3 Signals at Agua Mansa Road, C. R. England and Miguel
Bustamanta Pkwy
2- Traffic Volumes
23482
2/24/2022
3-Collision History
4 69%

0.86 16

4.00 0.35
5 31%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 1:25 P.M.
109
43-52

49.6 54.4
50 consistency with adjacent jurisdiction; high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
50 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 539
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
RV Center Drive
36 601 E. Washington Street - 1000 E. Washington Street EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.6 2 Lane (Urban)
62 - 65 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Stops at Washington Street (west end) and Santo
Antonio Drive/Washington Street (east end)
2- Traffic Volumes
1805
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 82%

1.08 8

2.00 5.06
1 13%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 10:48 A.M.
78 21-30

26.4 30.5
25 RV traffic; high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
25 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 540
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
San Bernardino Avenue
37 N. Pepper Avenue - N. Meridian Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.25 2 Lane (Urban)
40 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Pepper Avenue; 1 Stop at Meridian Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
5969
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 87%

1.08 37

9.25 16.98
7 19%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 10:52 A.M.
102
33-42

36.5 39.8
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 541
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
San Bernardino Avenue
38 N. Syncamore Avenue - N. Pepper Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.74 2 Lane (Urban)
60 - 62 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Pepper Avenue; 1 Stop at Indigo Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
10748
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 86%

1.08 43

10.75 3.70
7 16%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 12:03 P.M.
102
35-44

39.6 43.2
40 high collision rate; bike lane; multi-modal street
classification; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC
Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 542
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Valley Boulevard
39 W. City Limits - N. Pepper Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.74 4L/Undivided (Urban)
83 - 98 Feet
4 Undivided
2 Signals at Wildrose Avenue and Pepper Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
9515
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 74%

0.86 25

6.25 2.43
3 12%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 9:08 A.M.
105
39-48

43.8 48.5
45 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 543
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Valley Boulevard
40 N. Pepper Avenue - N. Rancho Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.02 4L/Undivided (Urban)
64 - 100 Feet
4 Undivided
2 Signals at Pepper Avenue and Rancho Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
11709
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 82%

0.86 30

7.50 1.72
6 20%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 9:35 A.M.
103
41-50

45.6 49.8
45 high collision rate; truck traffic; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit
per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 544
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Valley Boulevard
41 N. Rancho Avenue - N. Mount Vernon Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.27 4L/Divided (Urban)
70 - 75 Feet
4 Divided
5 Signals at N. Rancho Avenue, 3rd Street, La Cadena
Drive, 9th Street and Mount Vernon Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
10182
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 65%

1.33 64

16.00 3.39
13 20%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 9:14 A.M.
104
26-35

32.3 37.5
35 rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 545
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Washington Street
42 West End - S. Mount Vernon Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.93 4L/Divided (Urban)
52-94 Feet
4 Divided
1 Signal at Mount Vernon Avenue; 1 Stop at RV Center
2- Traffic Volumes
4591
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 82%

1.33 13

3.25 2.09
2 15%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 10:23 A.M.
102
28-37

33.3 37.3
35 Closest to the 85th percentile speed
I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 546
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Washington Street
43 S. Mount Vernon Avenue - Reche Canyon Road
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

1.19 4L/Undivided (Urban)
72 - 113 Feet
4 Undivided
7 Signals at S. Mount Vernon Avenue, Bluff Road, S.

Meadow Lane, S. Cooley Drive, Barton Road, Mohave
Drive and Reche Canyon Road.
2- Traffic Volumes
24251
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 85%

0.86 63

15.75 1.50
18 29%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 10:34 A.M.
106
36-45

40.7 44.7
40 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 547
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:

Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Washington Street
44 Reche Canyon Road - S. Waterman Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions

0.65 4L/divided (Urban)
106 - 125 Feet
4 Divided
4 Signals at Reche Canyon Road, Hunts Lane, Wier Road,
S. Waterman Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
25821
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 78%

1.33 28

7.00 1.14
9 32%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/9/2022 9:55 A.M.
105
33-42

39.2 43.5
40 rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.

11.a
Packet Pg. 548
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23)

Appendix B: Speed Survey Data

11.a
Packet Pg. 549
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23)

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:43 PM TO 1:15 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED1 AGUA MANSA RD BETWEEN S. RIVERSIDE AVE AND S. RANCHO AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED1 AGUA MANSA RD BETWEEN S. RIVERSIDE AVE AND S. RANCHO AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 1 56 X 0 1 1 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 1 54 X 0 1 1 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 3 0 52 XXX 3 0 3 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 1 51 X 0 1 1 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 2 50 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 6 4 49 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 * PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 6 48 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 6 5 47 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 P ADT: 0
46 4 6 46 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 A
45 8 9 45 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 C
44 7 4 44 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 E
43 5 2 43 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 4 3 42 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
41 0 2 41 XX 0 2 2 *
40 4 0 40 XXXX 4 0 4 85TH %: 49.0 49.5 49.2 M.P.H.
39 0 3 39 XXX 0 3 3
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 45.8 45.7 45.7 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 42.5 41.9 42.2 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 42 - 51 41 - 50 41 - 50 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 87% 86% 87%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 6% 6% 6%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 7% 8% 8%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 45.76 45.70 45.73 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 10.00 13.28 11.46
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.16 3.64 3.39 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.27 0.11
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.43 0.52 0.33 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
54 50 104
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I I

11.a
Packet Pg. 550
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:06 AM TO 10:22 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED2 BARTON RD BETWEEN WASHINGTON ST AND SOUTH CITY BOUNDARY LIMITS.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED2 BARTON RD BETWEEN WASHINGTON ST AND SOUTH CITY BOUNDARY LIMITS. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 1 0 58 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 1 1 56 XX 1 1 2 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 2 0 55 XX 2 0 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 3 1 53 XXXX 3 1 4 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 3 3 52 XXXXXX 3 3 6 * STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 4 3 51 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 1 5 50 XXXXXX 1 5 6 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 5 4 49 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 P PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 6 7 48 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 A DEVELOPMENT:
47 5 6 47 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 C ADT: 0
46 3 4 46 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 E
45 3 5 45 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 *
44 2 4 44 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
43 4 3 43 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 3 1 42 XXXX 3 1 4
41 3 2 41 XXXXX 3 2 5
40 0 2 40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 52.2 50.7 51.4 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 1 1 38 XX 1 1 2 50TH %: 47.6 46.9 47.2 M.P.H.
37 0 0 37 0 0 0
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 43.0 43.1 43.0 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 43 - 52 43 - 52 43 - 52 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 72% 85% 78%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 14% 4% 9%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 14% 12% 13%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 47.62 46.88 47.25 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19.46 13.56 16.42
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.41 3.68 4.05 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.26 0.16
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.62 0.51 0.40 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 52 102
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 551
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:02 AM TO 9:37 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED3 BARTON RD BETWEEN S.LA CADENA DR AND E.CITY LIMITS .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED3 BARTON RD BETWEEN S.LA CADENA DR AND E.CITY LIMITS . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 1 0 53 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 1 0 52 X 1 0 1 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 1 1 50 XX 1 1 2 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 3 4 49 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 4 2 48 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 5 3 47 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * ADT: 0
46 5 7 46 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 *
45 6 5 45 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 P
44 3 4 44 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 A
43 2 0 43 XX 2 0 2 C EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 5 0 42 XXXXX 5 0 5 E
41 1 2 41 XXX 1 2 3 *
40 3 4 40 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * 85TH %: 48.3 47.4 47.9 M.P.H. 39 4 6 39 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 *
38 3 2 38 XXXXX 3 2 5 50TH %: 42.9 41.8 42.4 M.P.H.
37 0 3 37 XXX 0 3 3
36 2 0 36 XX 2 0 2 15TH %: 37.4 36.3 36.9 M.P.H.
35 1 3 35 XXXX 1 3 4
34 3 2 34 XXXXX 3 2 5 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 39 - 48 39 - 48 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 1 0 32 X 1 0 1 % IN PACE: 69% 65% 67%
31 0 2 31 XX 0 2 2
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 11% 10% 10%
29 1 1 29 XX 1 1 2
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 20% 25% 23%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 42.87 41.82 42.37 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27.52 28.87 28.18
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.25 5.37 5.31 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.57 0.27
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.71 0.75 0.52 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
55 51 106
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON
I

11.a
Packet Pg. 552
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:58 AM TO 10:43 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED4 C STREET BETWEEN N.RANCHO AVE AND COLTON AVE .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED4 C STREET BETWEEN N.RANCHO AVE AND COLTON AVE . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 34.0 33.4 33.7 M.P.H.
39 1 1 39 XX 1 1 2
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 29.3 29.1 29.2 M.P.H.
37 0 0 37 0 0 0
36 2 0 36 XX 2 0 2 15TH %: 24.6 24.9 24.8 M.P.H.
35 4 3 35 XXXXXXX 4 3 7
34 5 6 34 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 25 - 34 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 5 5 33 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
32 1 3 32 XXXX 1 3 4 * % IN PACE: 73% 78% 75%
31 3 4 31 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 P
30 4 0 30 XXXX 4 0 4 A % OVER PACE: 13% 7% 10%
29 6 7 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 C
28 0 6 28 XXXXXX 0 6 6 E % UNDER PACE: 13% 15% 14%
27 4 3 27 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
26 5 4 26 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29.29 29.15 29.22 M.P.H. 25 5 4 25 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
24 2 4 24 XXXXXX 2 4 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20.72 16.62 18.46 23 2 1 23 XXX 2 1 3
22 0 3 22 XXX 0 3 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.55 4.08 4.30 M.P.H. 21 1 0 21 X 1 0 1
20 2 0 20 XX 2 0 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.31 0.17 19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.55 0.42 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 54 106
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Thursday, March 10, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 553
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:12 AM TO 10:48 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED5 COLTON AVE BETWEEN NORTH CITY LIMIT AND E. E ST.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED5 COLTON AVE BETWEEN NORTH CITY LIMIT AND E. E ST. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 1 45 X 0 1 1
44 0 1 44 X 0 1 1
43 1 0 43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 1 1 42 XX 1 1 2
41 0 1 41 X 0 1 1
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 38.1 39.5 38.8 M.P.H.
39 3 4 39 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
38 5 6 38 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * 50TH %: 35.2 35.8 35.5 M.P.H. 37 8 8 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 *
36 6 7 36 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 P 15TH %: 32.3 32.1 32.2 M.P.H. 35 5 6 35 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 A
34 7 5 34 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 C 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 30 - 39 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 4 4 33 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 E
32 9 2 32 XXXXXXXXXXX 9 2 11 * % IN PACE: 96% 88% 92%
31 3 1 31 XXXX 3 1 4 *
30 0 2 30 XX 0 2 2 * % OVER PACE: 4% 8% 6%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 1 28 X 0 1 1 % UNDER PACE: 0% 4% 2%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 1 26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35.19 35.78 35.49 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 7.73 12.53 10.10
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 2.78 3.54 3.18 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.15 0.25 0.10
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.50 0.31 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 51 103
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 1, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 554
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:55 PM TO 2:25 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED6 CENTER ST BETWEEN S.RIVERSIDE AVE AND S.CITY LIMITS.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED6 CENTER ST BETWEEN S.RIVERSIDE AVE AND S.CITY LIMITS. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 1 48 X 0 1 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 0 47 X 1 0 1 ADT: 0
46 0 2 46 XX 0 2 2
45 3 0 45 XXX 3 0 3 *
44 0 2 44 XX 0 2 2 *
43 0 2 43 XX 0 2 2 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 6 5 42 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 P
41 3 7 41 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 A
40 6 5 40 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 C 85TH %: 42.5 43.0 42.8 M.P.H. 39 8 4 39 XXXXXXXXXXXX 8 4 12 E
38 5 4 38 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * 50TH %: 38.0 38.5 38.2 M.P.H. 37 4 3 37 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
36 3 5 36 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 * 15TH %: 33.4 33.9 33.6 M.P.H. 35 1 1 35 XX 1 1 2
34 1 2 34 XXX 1 2 3 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 35 - 44 36 - 45 M.P.H. 33 1 0 33 X 1 0 1
32 0 4 32 XXXX 0 4 4 % IN PACE: 76% 75% 74%
31 4 2 31 XXXXXX 4 2 6
30 3 0 30 XXX 3 0 3 % OVER PACE: 2% 6% 4%
29 0 2 29 XX 0 2 2
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 22% 20% 22%
27 1 0 27 X 1 0 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37.96 38.45 38.21 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19.55 19.49 19.39
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.42 4.42 4.40 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.38 0.19
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.62 0.44 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 51 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 555
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 11:04 AM TO 11:48 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED7 COOLEY DR BETWEEN E. COOLEY LN AND WASHINGTON ST .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED7 COOLEY DR BETWEEN E. COOLEY LN AND WASHINGTON ST . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 1 0 50 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 1 46 X 0 1 1
45 1 0 45 X 1 0 1
44 1 0 44 X 1 0 1
43 3 0 43 XXX 3 0 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 0 42 XX 2 0 2
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 39.7 37.4 38.6 M.P.H.
39 0 3 39 XXX 0 3 3
38 1 1 38 XX 1 1 2 50TH %: 33.8 32.9 33.4 M.P.H.
37 2 4 37 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
36 4 5 36 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * 15TH %: 27.9 28.5 28.2 M.P.H. 35 6 4 35 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
34 5 6 34 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 P 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 3 4 33 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 A
32 5 3 32 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 C % IN PACE: 73% 81% 77%
31 2 5 31 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 E
30 4 5 30 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * % OVER PACE: 18% 11% 14%
29 3 4 29 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
28 3 3 28 XXXXXX 3 3 6 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 8% 9%
27 1 0 27 X 1 0 1
26 0 2 26 XX 0 2 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33.80 32.94 33.37 M.P.H. 25 2 1 25 XXX 2 1 3
24 1 0 24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32.44 18.29 25.17
23 1 1 23 XX 1 1 2
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.70 4.28 5.02 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.64 0.35 0.24
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.80 0.59 0.49 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 53 104
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 556
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:15 PM TO 1:32 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED8 COOLEY DR BETWEEN S. MT VERNON AVE AND E. COOLEY LN.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED8 COOLEY DR BETWEEN S. MT VERNON AVE AND E. COOLEY LN. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 1 0 53 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 1 51 X 0 1 1 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 1 49 X 0 1 1 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 1 48 X 0 1 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 3 47 XXX 0 3 3 ADT: 0
46 2 0 46 XX 2 0 2
45 0 1 45 X 0 1 1
44 2 3 44 XXXXX 2 3 5
43 4 2 43 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 6 4 42 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
41 3 1 41 XXXX 3 1 4 *
40 5 4 40 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 P 85TH %: 43.6 44.4 44.0 M.P.H. 39 4 3 39 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 A
38 3 5 38 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 C 50TH %: 37.8 38.9 38.3 M.P.H. 37 2 4 37 XXXXXX 2 4 6 E
36 3 6 36 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 * 15TH %: 32.1 33.3 32.7 M.P.H. 35 5 3 35 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
34 4 2 34 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 35 - 44 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 1 0 33 X 1 0 1
32 2 2 32 XXXX 2 2 4 % IN PACE: 74% 70% 71%
31 3 0 31 XXX 3 0 3
30 0 1 30 X 0 1 1 % OVER PACE: 9% 14% 15%
29 0 2 29 XX 0 2 2
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 17% 16% 15%
27 0 1 27 X 0 1 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37.85 38.88 38.35 M.P.H. 25 2 0 25 XX 2 0 2
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 30.78 28.56 29.68
23 1 0 23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.55 5.34 5.45 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.57 0.29
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.76 0.76 0.54 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
53 50 103
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 557
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:46 PM TO 1:48 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED9 EUCALYPTUS AVE BETWEEN W.RANDALL AVE AND SAN BERNARDINO AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED9 EUCALYPTUS AVE BETWEEN W.RANDALL AVE AND SAN BERNARDINO AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 32.9 33.0 32.9 M.P.H.
39 1 0 39 X 1 0 1
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 29.2 29.1 29.2 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 1 0 36 X 1 0 1 15TH %: 25.5 25.3 25.4 M.P.H.
35 3 4 35 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
34 2 1 34 XXX 2 1 3 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 2 3 33 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
32 5 6 32 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * % IN PACE: 84% 84% 84%
31 4 5 31 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
30 3 7 30 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 P % OVER PACE: 10% 12% 13%
29 4 1 29 XXXXX 4 1 5 A
28 6 4 28 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 C % UNDER PACE: 6% 4% 3%
27 5 4 27 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 E
26 7 5 26 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29.20 29.14 29.17 M.P.H. 25 4 3 25 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
24 2 5 24 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13.06 13.68 13.24 23 1 1 23 XX 1 1 2
22 0 1 22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.61 3.70 3.64 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.27 0.13
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.51 0.52 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 51 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I I

11.a
Packet Pg. 558
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:10 AM TO 9:53 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED10 FAIRWAY DR BETWEEN N. MT VERNON AVE AND AUTO PLAZA DR.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED10 FAIRWAY DR BETWEEN N. MT VERNON AVE AND AUTO PLAZA DR. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 2 0 47 XX 2 0 2 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 1 0 45 X 1 0 1
44 3 2 44 XXXXX 3 2 5
43 3 1 43 XXXX 3 1 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 2 3 42 XXXXX 2 3 5
41 1 2 41 XXX 1 2 3
40 2 1 40 XXX 2 1 3 85TH %: 41.7 40.0 40.9 M.P.H.
39 3 2 39 XXXXX 3 2 5 *
38 1 4 38 XXXXX 1 4 5 * 50TH %: 36.2 35.4 35.8 M.P.H. 37 4 5 37 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
36 3 5 36 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 P 15TH %: 30.7 30.8 30.8 M.P.H. 35 2 4 35 XXXXXX 2 4 6 A
34 6 3 34 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 C 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 29 - 38 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 2 5 33 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 E
32 4 3 32 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * % IN PACE: 64% 74% 68%
31 4 3 31 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
30 3 2 30 XXXXX 3 2 5 * % OVER PACE: 28% 22% 23%
29 1 3 29 XXXX 1 3 4
28 3 0 28 XXX 3 0 3 % UNDER PACE: 8% 4% 9%
27 0 1 27 X 0 1 1
26 0 1 26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36.22 35.40 35.81 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 28.18 19.51 23.77
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.31 4.42 4.88 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.56 0.39 0.24
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.75 0.62 0.49 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 1, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 559
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:05 PM TO 12:39 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED11 HUNTS LN BETWEEN W.REDLANDS BLVD AND WASHINGTON ST .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED11 HUNTS LN BETWEEN W.REDLANDS BLVD AND WASHINGTON ST . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 2 52 XX 0 2 2 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 1 50 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 2 0 49 XX 2 0 2 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 2 48 XX 0 2 2 DEVELOPMENT:
47 2 4 47 XXXXXX 2 4 6 ADT: 0
46 1 0 46 X 1 0 1
45 1 3 45 XXXX 1 3 4
44 3 0 44 XXX 3 0 3
43 2 2 43 XXXX 2 2 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 1 3 42 XXXX 1 3 4
41 5 0 41 XXXXX 5 0 5 *
40 0 3 40 XXX 0 3 3 * 85TH %: 43.0 45.3 44.4 M.P.H.
39 1 3 39 XXXX 1 3 4 *
38 0 4 38 XXXX 0 4 4 P 50TH %: 35.6 39.1 37.3 M.P.H.
37 2 5 37 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 A
36 5 5 36 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 C 15TH %: 28.1 32.9 30.3 M.P.H. 35 1 2 35 XXX 1 2 3 E
34 3 4 34 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 31 - 40 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 2 2 33 XXXX 2 2 4 *
32 3 2 32 XXXXX 3 2 5 * % IN PACE: 50% 63% 51%
31 2 2 31 XXXX 2 2 4
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 40% 33% 29%
29 3 1 29 XXXX 3 1 4
28 2 0 28 XX 2 0 2 % UNDER PACE: 10% 4% 20%
27 4 1 27 XXXXX 4 1 5
26 2 0 26 XX 2 0 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35.56 39.08 37.34 M.P.H. 25 2 0 25 XX 2 0 2
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 52.09 35.79 46.55
23 1 0 23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7.22 5.98 6.82 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 1.04 0.70 0.46
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.02 0.84 0.68 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 51 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 560
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 11:05 AM TO 11:52 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED12 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN N. MT VERNON AVE AND N. 8TH ST.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED12 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN N. MT VERNON AVE AND N. 8TH ST. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 1 0 43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 2 0 41 XX 2 0 2
40 0 2 40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 37.8 36.6 37.2 M.P.H.
39 2 0 39 XX 2 0 2
38 4 3 38 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * 50TH %: 34.1 33.3 33.7 M.P.H. 37 2 3 37 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
36 5 5 36 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 * 15TH %: 30.5 29.9 30.2 M.P.H. 35 6 7 35 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 P
34 7 5 34 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 A 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 5 6 33 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 C
32 4 3 32 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E % IN PACE: 86% 92% 89%
31 5 5 31 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
30 3 4 30 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * % OVER PACE: 6% 4% 7%
29 2 6 29 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 *
28 1 0 28 X 1 0 1 % UNDER PACE: 8% 4% 4%
27 0 2 27 XX 0 2 2
26 1 0 26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34.14 33.27 33.70 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 12.25 10.44 11.41
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.50 3.23 3.38 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.20 0.11
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.45 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 51 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 1, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 561
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 11:10 AM TO 12:06 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED13 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN N. 8TH ST AND VALLEY BLVD .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED13 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN N. 8TH ST AND VALLEY BLVD . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 1 42 X 0 1 1
41 2 0 41 XX 2 0 2
40 0 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 35.3 35.8 35.5 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 0 1 38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 31.1 31.8 31.4 M.P.H.
37 1 2 37 XXX 1 2 3 *
36 4 2 36 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * 15TH %: 26.8 27.8 27.3 M.P.H. 35 5 5 35 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
34 3 4 34 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 P 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 5 5 33 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 A
32 4 5 32 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 C % IN PACE: 81% 84% 82%
31 4 7 31 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 E
30 2 4 30 XXXXXX 2 4 6 * % OVER PACE: 6% 6% 5%
29 7 6 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 *
28 6 3 28 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 10% 14%
27 2 0 27 XX 2 0 2
26 3 1 26 XXXX 3 1 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31.06 31.78 31.42 M.P.H. 25 1 3 25 XXXX 1 3 4
24 1 0 24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17.08 14.69 15.87
23 2 1 23 XXX 2 1 3
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.13 3.83 3.98 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.29 0.15
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.57 0.54 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 51 103
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Thursday, March 10, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 562
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:15 AM TO 10:35 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED14 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN VALLEY BLVD AND BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED14 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN VALLEY BLVD AND BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 1 56 X 0 1 1 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 1 0 55 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 2 54 XX 0 2 2 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 3 0 53 XXX 3 0 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 1 2 52 XXX 1 2 3 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 3 3 51 XXXXXX 3 3 6 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 3 50 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 4 5 49 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 2 48 XXXXX 3 2 5 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 2 47 XXX 1 2 3 ADT: 0
46 2 3 46 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
45 4 1 45 XXXXX 4 1 5 *
44 2 1 44 XXX 2 1 3 *
43 4 0 43 XXXX 4 0 4 P NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 1 1 42 XX 1 1 2 A
41 5 5 41 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 C
40 5 6 40 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 E 85TH %: 49.8 49.8 49.8 M.P.H. 39 5 5 39 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
38 4 3 38 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * 50TH %: 44.4 43.7 44.1 M.P.H. 37 1 5 37 XXXXXX 1 5 6 *
36 2 1 36 XXX 2 1 3 15TH %: 39.0 37.6 38.3 M.P.H.
35 0 1 35 X 0 1 1
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 37 - 46 37 - 46 M.P.H. 33 0 1 33 X 0 1 1
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 60% 57% 58%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 35% 38% 37%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 5% 6% 5%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 44.38 43.74 44.06 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27.02 34.62 30.57
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.20 5.88 5.53 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.65 0.28
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.70 0.81 0.53 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
55 53 108
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 563
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:43 AM TO 9:58 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED15 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS AND S.CITY LIMITS .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED15 LA CADENA DR BETWEEN BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS AND S.CITY LIMITS . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 1 62 X 0 1 1 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 MPH
60 1 2 60 XXX 1 2 3 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 1 59 X 0 1 1 COMMENTS:
58 1 0 58 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 3 57 XXX 0 3 3
56 2 0 56 XX 2 0 2 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 1 4 55 XXXXX 1 4 5 * ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 4 5 54 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * NUMBER OF LANES:
53 2 3 53 XXXXX 2 3 5 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 4 7 52 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 P STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 7 6 51 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 A EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 2 50 XXXXXX 4 2 6 C DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 9 4 49 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 4 13 E PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0 48 6 2 48 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 4 1 47 XXXXX 4 1 5 * ADT: 0
46 0 3 46 XXX 0 3 3 *
45 1 0 45 X 1 0 1
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 2 0 43 XX 2 0 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 1 0 42 X 1 0 1
41 0 3 41 XXX 0 3 3
40 1 0 40 X 1 0 1 85TH %: 54.7 57.1 55.9 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 1 0 38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 48.9 50.4 49.6 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 43.1 43.6 43.3 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 2 1 34 XXX 2 1 3 10 MPH PACE: 47 - 56 46 - 55 46 - 55 M.P.H. 33 0 2 33 XX 0 2 2
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 80% 73% 74%
31 1 0 31 X 1 0 1
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 4% 14% 10%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 17% 14% 15%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 48.87 50.35 49.59 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 31.51 42.43 37.01
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.61 6.51 6.08 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.83 0.35
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.76 0.91 0.59 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
54 51 105
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON
I I

11.a
Packet Pg. 564
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 2:16 PM TO 3:05 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED16 LAUREL ST BETWEEN GRAND AVE AND PENNSYLVANIA AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED16 LAUREL ST BETWEEN GRAND AVE AND PENNSYLVANIA AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 2 0 47 XX 2 0 2 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 2 45 XX 0 2 2
44 0 1 44 X 0 1 1
43 0 2 43 XX 0 2 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 1 1 42 XX 1 1 2
41 0 1 41 X 0 1 1
40 3 1 40 XXXX 3 1 4 * 85TH %: 39.5 39.9 39.7 M.P.H.
39 2 2 39 XXXX 2 2 4 *
38 5 3 38 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * 50TH %: 35.4 35.0 35.2 M.P.H. 37 6 4 37 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 P
36 4 3 36 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 A 15TH %: 31.4 30.2 30.8 M.P.H. 35 4 5 35 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 C
34 6 6 34 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 E 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 30 - 39 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 5 4 33 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
32 6 4 32 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 * % IN PACE: 90% 76% 80%
31 4 3 31 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
30 0 4 30 XXXX 0 4 4 % OVER PACE: 6% 16% 10%
29 1 2 29 XXX 1 2 3
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 4% 8% 10%
27 1 1 27 XX 1 1 2
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35.42 35.04 35.23 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 1 24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 15.35 21.63 18.34
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.92 4.65 4.28 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.31 0.43 0.18
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.55 0.66 0.43 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 1, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 565
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:15 PM TO 2:12 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED17 LAUREL ST BETWEEN PENNSYLVANIA AVE AND N. MT VERNON AVE .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED17 LAUREL ST BETWEEN PENNSYLVANIA AVE AND N. MT VERNON AVE . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 1 46 X 0 1 1
45 1 1 45 XX 1 1 2
44 0 1 44 X 0 1 1
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 2 0 42 XX 2 0 2
41 2 1 41 XXX 2 1 3
40 0 2 40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 37.6 38.6 38.1 M.P.H.
39 2 3 39 XXXXX 2 3 5
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 33.2 33.3 33.2 M.P.H.
37 0 2 37 XX 0 2 2
36 3 2 36 XXXXX 3 2 5 * 15TH %: 28.8 28.0 28.4 M.P.H. 35 6 4 35 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
34 4 6 34 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 28 - 37 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 7 4 33 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 P
32 5 6 32 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 A % IN PACE: 84% 75% 79%
31 5 4 31 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 C
30 4 3 30 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E % OVER PACE: 14% 18% 18%
29 3 3 29 XXXXXX 3 3 6 *
28 2 4 28 XXXXXX 2 4 6 * % UNDER PACE: 2% 8% 3%
27 3 2 27 XXXXX 3 2 5 *
26 1 0 26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33.18 33.29 33.24 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 1 24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17.86 25.81 21.66
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.23 5.08 4.65 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 1 20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.36 0.51 0.21
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.60 0.71 0.46 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 51 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 1, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 566
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:05 AM TO 10:05 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED18 M ST BETWEEN S. LA CADENA DR AND MT VERNON AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED18 M ST BETWEEN S. LA CADENA DR AND MT VERNON AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 2 49 XX 0 2 2 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 0 48 XXX 3 0 3 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 2 47 XX 0 2 2 ADT: 0
46 0 3 46 XXX 0 3 3
45 2 1 45 XXX 2 1 3
44 1 1 44 XX 1 1 2
43 4 0 43 XXXX 4 0 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 1 1 42 XX 1 1 2
41 5 5 41 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
40 5 6 40 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * 85TH %: 43.3 43.7 43.5 M.P.H. 39 5 5 39 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
38 4 3 38 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 P 50TH %: 38.3 38.6 38.5 M.P.H. 37 1 5 37 XXXXXX 1 5 6 A
36 4 2 36 XXXXXX 4 2 6 C 15TH %: 33.3 33.5 33.4 M.P.H. 35 4 3 35 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E
34 1 4 34 XXXXX 1 4 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 33 - 42 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 4 2 33 XXXXXX 4 2 6 *
32 3 1 32 XXXX 3 1 4 * % IN PACE: 72% 72% 72%
31 0 2 31 XX 0 2 2
30 2 1 30 XXX 2 1 3 % OVER PACE: 22% 18% 21%
29 0 1 29 X 0 1 1
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 6% 10% 7%
27 1 0 27 X 1 0 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38.28 38.64 38.46 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23.31 24.15 23.52
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.83 4.91 4.85 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.48 0.24
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.68 0.70 0.49 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 567
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:05 AM TO 10:42 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED19 MERIDIAN AVE BETWEEN RANDALL AVE AND W. VALLEY BLVD.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED19 MERIDIAN AVE BETWEEN RANDALL AVE AND W. VALLEY BLVD. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 2 0 47 XX 2 0 2 ADT: 0
46 1 3 46 XXXX 1 3 4
45 3 2 45 XXXXX 3 2 5
44 1 1 44 XX 1 1 2
43 4 0 43 XXXX 4 0 4 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 4 3 42 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
41 4 5 41 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
40 5 6 40 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 P 85TH %: 43.6 42.2 42.9 M.P.H. 39 7 6 39 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 A
38 3 5 38 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 C 50TH %: 39.3 38.3 38.8 M.P.H. 37 5 6 37 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 E
36 4 6 36 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 15TH %: 34.9 34.5 34.7 M.P.H. 35 2 5 35 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 *
34 1 3 34 XXXX 1 3 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 33 - 42 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 0 2 33 XX 0 2 2
32 2 1 32 XXX 2 1 3 % IN PACE: 80% 85% 80%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 6% 11% 12%
29 1 1 29 XX 1 1 2
28 1 0 28 X 1 0 1 % UNDER PACE: 14% 4% 8%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39.28 38.35 38.79 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17.59 13.56 15.55
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.19 3.68 3.94 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.25 0.15
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.59 0.50 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 55 105
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I

11.a
Packet Pg. 568
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:27 PM TO 1:52 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED20 MILL ST BETWEEN N. RANCHO AVE AND BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED20 MILL ST BETWEEN N. RANCHO AVE AND BNSF RAILROAD OVERPASS . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 1 0 50 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 1 49 X 0 1 1 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 1 0 48 X 1 0 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 1 2 46 XXX 1 2 3
45 2 3 45 XXXXX 2 3 5
44 1 0 44 X 1 0 1
43 0 2 43 XX 0 2 2 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 4 6 42 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 *
41 3 1 41 XXXX 3 1 4 *
40 5 4 40 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 P 85TH %: 42.4 43.0 42.7 M.P.H. 39 3 6 39 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 A
38 3 4 38 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 C 50TH %: 36.6 37.9 37.2 M.P.H. 37 4 3 37 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E
36 4 5 36 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * 15TH %: 30.8 32.8 31.8 M.P.H. 35 3 5 35 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 *
34 3 2 34 XXXXX 3 2 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 34 - 43 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 0 1 33 X 0 1 1
32 3 2 32 XXXXX 3 2 5 % IN PACE: 59% 72% 65%
31 2 1 31 XXX 2 1 3
30 4 3 30 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 % OVER PACE: 11% 11% 11%
29 5 0 29 XXXXX 5 0 5
28 1 0 28 X 1 0 1 % UNDER PACE: 30% 17% 23%
27 0 2 27 XX 0 2 2
26 1 0 26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36.59 37.87 37.22 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 31.23 24.08 27.84
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.59 4.91 5.28 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.45 0.26
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.76 0.67 0.51 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
54 53 107
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 569
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:12 PM TO 13:08 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED21 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN JOHNSTON ST AND GRANT AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED21 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN JOHNSTON ST AND GRANT AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 LANES PER DIRECTION:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 28.0 28.5 28.3 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 24.7 25.1 24.9 M.P.H.
37 0 0 37 0 0 0
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 21.3 21.7 21.5 M.P.H.
35 1 0 35 x 1 0 1
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 20 - 29 20 - 29 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 3 32 xxx 0 3 3 % IN PACE: 88% 84% 86%
31 2 2 31 xxxx 2 2 4
30 0 2 30 xx 0 2 2 % OVER PACE: 6% 14% 10%
29 3 1 29 xxxx 3 1 4 *
28 1 2 28 XXX 1 2 3 * % UNDER PACE: 6% 2% 4%
27 6 3 27 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 *
26 4 6 26 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 P ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24.68 25.14 24.91 M.P.H. 25 7 8 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 A
24 8 9 24 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 C SAMPLE VARIANCE: 10.55 10.74 10.59 23 7 5 23 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 E
22 5 2 22 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.25 3.28 3.25 M.P.H. 21 3 3 21 XXXXXX 3 3 6 *
20 0 3 20 XXX 0 3 3 * VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.21 0.11 19 2 1 19 XXX 2 1 3
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.46 0.33 M.P.H. 17 1 0 17 X 1 0 1
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, February 23, 2022
City of Colton
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 570
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:06 AM TO 9:28 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED22 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN E. CITRUS ST-GRANT AVE. AND VALLEY BLVD.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED22 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN E. CITRUS ST-GRANT AVE. AND VALLEY BLVD. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 1 0 55 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 2 1 54 XXX 2 1 3 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 2 0 52 XX 2 0 2 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 1 1 51 XX 1 1 2 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 3 0 50 XXX 3 0 3 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 2 0 49 XX 2 0 2 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 0 48 XXX 3 0 3 DEVELOPMENT:
47 4 0 47 XXXX 4 0 4 ADT: 0
46 2 0 46 XX 2 0 2
45 1 2 45 XXX 1 2 3
44 0 1 44 X 0 1 1
43 3 0 43 XXX 3 0 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 0 42 XX 2 0 2
41 3 0 41 XXX 3 0 3 *
40 2 1 40 XXX 2 1 3 * 85TH %: 49.1 41.6 46.1 M.P.H.
39 5 6 39 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 *
38 4 8 38 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 P 50TH %: 42.4 36.9 39.7 M.P.H. 37 3 6 37 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 A
36 1 6 36 XXXXXXX 1 6 7 C 15TH %: 35.8 32.2 33.3 M.P.H. 35 3 5 35 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 E
34 4 6 34 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 0 4 33 XXXX 0 4 4 *
32 1 3 32 XXXX 1 3 4 * % IN PACE: 57% 87% 68%
31 1 0 31 X 1 0 1
30 0 1 30 X 0 1 1 % OVER PACE: 40% 10% 30%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 1 28 X 0 1 1 % UNDER PACE: 4% 4% 3%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 42.43 36.92 39.70 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 40.87 20.62 38.21
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6.39 4.54 6.18 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.77 0.40 0.36
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.88 0.63 0.60 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
53 52 105
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 571
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:45 PM TO 2:08 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED23 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN E. VALLEY BLVD AND COOLEY DR.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED23 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN E. VALLEY BLVD AND COOLEY DR. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 0 47 X 1 0 1 ADT: 0
46 1 0 46 X 1 0 1
45 1 1 45 XX 1 1 2
44 2 1 44 XXX 2 1 3
43 0 1 43 X 0 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 1 42 X 0 1 1
41 0 3 41 XXX 0 3 3
40 0 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 39.3 39.3 39.3 M.P.H.
39 1 3 39 XXXX 1 3 4
38 5 4 38 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * 50TH %: 34.4 34.6 34.5 M.P.H. 37 4 0 37 XXXX 4 0 4 *
36 5 3 36 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * 15TH %: 29.4 29.8 29.6 M.P.H. 35 2 4 35 XXXXXX 2 4 6 P
34 3 6 34 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 A 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 30 - 39 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 5 2 33 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 C
32 4 6 32 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 E % IN PACE: 82% 72% 77%
31 5 5 31 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
30 6 3 30 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 * % OVER PACE: 12% 16% 17%
29 3 3 29 XXXXXX 3 3 6 *
28 2 2 28 XXXX 2 2 4 % UNDER PACE: 6% 12% 6%
27 1 0 27 X 1 0 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34.37 34.58 34.48 M.P.H. 25 0 1 25 X 0 1 1
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22.96 21.11 21.83
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.79 4.59 4.67 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.42 0.22
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.67 0.65 0.46 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 50 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 572
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:02 AM TO 9:43 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED24 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN COOLEY DR AND WASHINGTON ST .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED24 MT VERNON AVE BETWEEN COOLEY DR AND WASHINGTON ST . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 1 0 45 X 1 0 1
44 0 1 44 X 0 1 1
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 2 42 XXXX 2 2 4
41 1 2 41 XXX 1 2 3
40 3 2 40 XXXXX 3 2 5 85TH %: 39.2 39.6 39.4 M.P.H.
39 4 5 39 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
38 3 7 38 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 * 50TH %: 33.9 34.9 34.4 M.P.H. 37 5 3 37 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
36 2 5 36 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 P 15TH %: 28.5 30.2 29.4 M.P.H. 35 6 2 35 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 A
34 0 5 34 XXXXX 0 5 5 C 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 30 - 39 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 2 4 33 XXXXXX 2 4 6 E
32 3 1 32 XXXX 3 1 4 * % IN PACE: 61% 77% 69%
31 3 4 31 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
30 3 5 30 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 * % OVER PACE: 8% 13% 13%
29 4 0 29 XXXX 4 0 4
28 3 2 28 XXXXX 3 2 5 % UNDER PACE: 31% 9% 17%
27 3 1 27 XXXX 3 1 4
26 0 1 26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33.86 34.94 34.41 M.P.H. 25 2 0 25 XX 2 0 2
24 1 0 24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26.36 20.52 23.45
23 0 1 23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.13 4.53 4.84 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.52 0.39 0.23
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.72 0.62 0.47 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 53 104
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 573
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:58 PM TO 2:52 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED25 CITRUS ST BETWEEN TERESA AVE AND RANCHO AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED25 CITRUS ST BETWEEN TERESA AVE AND RANCHO AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 1 0 42 X 1 0 1
41 1 0 41 X 1 0 1
40 0 2 40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 35.7 34.6 35.1 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 1 0 38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 30.6 30.5 30.6 M.P.H.
37 1 1 37 XX 1 1 2
36 3 2 36 XXXXX 3 2 5 * 15TH %: 25.6 26.4 26.0 M.P.H. 35 0 2 35 XX 0 2 2 *
34 6 4 34 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 25 - 34 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 7 8 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 P
32 5 6 32 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 A % IN PACE: 75% 80% 77%
31 4 5 31 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 C
30 2 4 30 XXXXXX 2 4 6 E % OVER PACE: 8% 13% 7%
29 5 3 29 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
28 3 4 28 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * % UNDER PACE: 18% 7% 17%
27 3 6 27 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 *
26 2 0 26 XX 2 0 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30.61 30.50 30.55 M.P.H. 25 0 5 25 XXXXX 0 5 5
24 1 4 24 XXXXX 1 4 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23.72 15.71 19.34 23 2 0 23 XX 2 0 2
22 1 0 22 X 1 0 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.87 3.96 4.40 M.P.H. 21 2 0 21 XX 2 0 2
20 1 0 20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.28 0.18
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.68 0.53 0.43 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 56 107
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 574
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:28 PM TO 1:19 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED26 OLIVE ST BETWEEN MERIDIAN AVE AND N. RANCHO AVE RAIL RD.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED26 OLIVE ST BETWEEN MERIDIAN AVE AND N. RANCHO AVE RAIL RD. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 31.9 31.8 31.9 M.P.H.
39 0 1 39 X 0 1 1
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 27.8 27.1 27.4 M.P.H.
37 1 1 37 XX 1 1 2
36 0 1 36 X 0 1 1 15TH %: 23.7 22.3 23.0 M.P.H.
35 1 0 35 X 1 0 1
34 3 1 34 XXXX 3 1 4 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 2 4 33 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
32 3 0 32 XXX 3 0 3 * % IN PACE: 80% 74% 77%
31 2 2 31 XXXX 2 2 4 *
30 5 4 30 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 P % OVER PACE: 10% 8% 9%
29 4 2 29 XXXXXX 4 2 6 A
28 3 4 28 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 C % UNDER PACE: 10% 18% 14%
27 5 6 27 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 E
26 4 6 26 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27.78 27.06 27.42 M.P.H. 25 7 3 25 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 *
24 5 6 24 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 15.69 21.32 18.45 23 2 1 23 XXX 2 1 3
22 0 1 22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.96 4.62 4.30 M.P.H. 21 2 3 21 XXXXX 2 3 5
20 0 2 20 XX 0 2 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.31 0.43 0.18 19 1 2 19 XXX 1 2 3
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.56 0.65 0.43 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Thursday, March 10, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 575
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:42 AM TO 10:31 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED27 OLIVE ST BETWEEN N. RANCHO AVE AND N. LA CADENA AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED27 OLIVE ST BETWEEN N. RANCHO AVE AND N. LA CADENA AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 31.6 31.7 31.6 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 27.0 27.0 27.0 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 2 1 36 XXX 2 1 3 15TH %: 22.4 22.3 22.4 M.P.H.
35 2 2 35 XXXX 2 2 4
34 2 0 34 XX 2 0 2 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 23 - 32 21 - 30 M.P.H. 33 0 1 33 X 0 1 1
32 2 4 32 XXXXXX 2 4 6 % IN PACE: 78% 72% 74%
31 1 3 31 XXXX 1 3 4
30 4 3 30 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * % OVER PACE: 18% 10% 21%
29 4 5 29 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
28 5 1 28 XXXXXX 5 1 6 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 18% 5%
27 6 4 27 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 P
26 3 3 26 XXXXXX 3 3 6 A ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27.04 26.98 27.01 M.P.H. 25 5 6 25 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 C
24 3 5 24 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 E SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19.63 20.51 19.87 23 3 2 23 XXXXX 3 2 5 *
22 4 3 22 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.43 4.53 4.46 M.P.H. 21 2 3 21 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
20 0 1 20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.41 0.20
19 0 2 19 XX 0 2 2
18 1 0 18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.64 0.45 M.P.H. 17 1 0 17 X 1 0 1
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 576
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:37 AM TO 11:32 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED28 PENNSYLVANIA AVE BETWEEN MILL ST AND W. VALLEY BLVD .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED28 PENNSYLVANIA AVE BETWEEN MILL ST AND W. VALLEY BLVD . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 1 45 X 0 1 1
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 2 1 43 XXX 2 1 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 1 0 42 X 1 0 1
41 2 1 41 XXX 2 1 3
40 1 2 40 XXX 1 2 3 85TH %: 37.8 37.7 37.7 M.P.H.
39 2 0 39 XX 2 0 2
38 1 3 38 XXXX 1 3 4 50TH %: 33.2 33.2 33.2 M.P.H.
37 0 2 37 XX 0 2 2
36 4 3 36 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * 15TH %: 28.5 28.6 28.6 M.P.H. 35 3 4 35 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
34 5 5 34 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 29 - 38 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 4 3 33 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 P
32 4 6 32 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 A % IN PACE: 78% 76% 77%
31 5 6 31 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 C
30 7 5 30 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 E % OVER PACE: 18% 10% 19% 29 2 1 29 XXX 2 1 3 *
28 4 3 28 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 14% 4%
27 1 2 27 XXX 1 2 3 *
26 1 1 26 XX 1 1 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33.16 33.16 33.16 M.P.H. 25 1 0 25 X 1 0 1
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19.89 19.32 19.41
23 0 1 23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.46 4.40 4.41 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.39 0.19
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.62 0.44 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 577
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:35 PM TO 1:52 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED29 PEPPER AVE BETWEEN RANDALL AVE AND W. VALLEY BLVD .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED29 PEPPER AVE BETWEEN RANDALL AVE AND W. VALLEY BLVD . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 1 0 61 X 1 0 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 1 58 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 1 56 X 0 1 1 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 1 0 55 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 3 1 54 XXXX 3 1 4 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 4 0 53 XXXX 4 0 4 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 2 1 52 XXX 2 1 3 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 4 51 XXXX 0 4 4 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 2 1 50 XXX 2 1 3 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 2 48 XXXXX 3 2 5 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 5 47 XXXXXX 1 5 6 * ADT: 0
46 4 3 46 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
45 4 1 45 XXXXX 4 1 5 P
44 0 2 44 XX 0 2 2 A
43 0 4 43 XXXX 0 4 4 C NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 6 42 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 E
41 0 5 41 XXXXX 0 5 5 *
40 2 6 40 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 * 85TH %: 49.6 49.7 49.9 M.P.H. 39 4 3 39 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
38 3 0 38 XXX 3 0 3 50TH %: 40.7 43.4 41.9 M.P.H.
37 2 1 37 XXX 2 1 3
36 5 0 36 XXXXX 5 0 5 15TH %: 31.8 37.1 34.0 M.P.H.
35 2 2 35 XXXX 2 2 4
34 2 0 34 XX 2 0 2 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 39 - 48 39 - 48 M.P.H. 33 5 0 33 XXXXX 5 0 5
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 48% 71% 50%
31 4 1 31 XXXXX 4 1 5
30 3 0 30 XXX 3 0 3 % OVER PACE: 46% 17% 19%
29 2 2 29 XXXX 2 2 4
28 1 0 28 X 1 0 1 % UNDER PACE: 6% 12% 31%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 1 0 26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40.73 43.42 41.95 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 73.62 36.92 58.37
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 8.58 6.08 7.64 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 1.17 0.71 0.51
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 1.08 0.84 0.71 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
63 52 115
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Thursday, March 10, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 578
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:48 PM TO 1:12 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED30 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN N. CITY LIMIT AND MILL ST.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED30 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN N. CITY LIMIT AND MILL ST. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 1 0 50 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 1 48 X 0 1 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 0 47 X 1 0 1 ADT: 0
46 2 2 46 XXXX 2 2 4
45 0 3 45 XXX 0 3 3
44 3 2 44 XXXXX 3 2 5
43 4 6 43 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 4 42 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
41 6 5 41 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 *
40 6 4 40 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 P 85TH %: 43.3 43.8 43.5 M.P.H. 39 4 3 39 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 A
38 2 1 38 XXX 2 1 3 C 50TH %: 38.6 38.2 38.4 M.P.H.
37 2 5 37 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 E
36 5 0 36 XXXXX 5 0 5 * 15TH %: 33.9 32.6 33.3 M.P.H. 35 3 0 35 XXX 3 0 3 *
34 5 2 34 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 37 - 46 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 3 4 33 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
32 2 5 32 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 % IN PACE: 74% 65% 64%
31 1 3 31 XXXX 1 3 4
30 0 2 30 XX 0 2 2 % OVER PACE: 13% 2% 14%
29 1 0 29 X 1 0 1
28 0 1 28 X 0 1 1 % UNDER PACE: 13% 33% 21%
27 0 1 27 X 0 1 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38.62 38.19 38.40 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20.39 28.98 24.54
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.52 5.38 4.95 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.54 0.23
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.62 0.73 0.48 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
53 54 107
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 579
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:20 PM TO 12:40 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED31 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN MILL ST AND W. VALLEY BLVD.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED31 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN MILL ST AND W. VALLEY BLVD. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 1 52 X 0 1 1 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 1 51 X 0 1 1 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 1 49 X 0 1 1 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 0 48 XXX 3 0 3 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 2 47 XX 0 2 2 ADT: 0
46 1 3 46 XXXX 1 3 4
45 4 1 45 XXXXX 4 1 5
44 1 1 44 XX 1 1 2
43 3 1 43 XXXX 3 1 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 0 42 XX 2 0 2
41 3 2 41 XXXXX 3 2 5
40 3 3 40 XXXXXX 3 3 6 * 85TH %: 43.6 43.9 43.8 M.P.H. 39 4 4 39 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 *
38 5 4 38 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * 50TH %: 38.4 37.7 38.0 M.P.H. 37 4 3 37 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 P
36 5 2 36 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 A 15TH %: 33.2 31.4 32.3 M.P.H. 35 3 1 35 XXXX 3 1 4 C
34 1 5 34 XXXXXX 1 5 6 E 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 3 4 33 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
32 2 3 32 XXXXX 2 3 5 * % IN PACE: 65% 66% 66%
31 4 4 31 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 *
30 0 2 30 XX 0 2 2 % OVER PACE: 8% 26% 29%
29 0 1 29 X 0 1 1
28 0 1 28 X 0 1 1 % UNDER PACE: 27% 8% 5%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 1 0 26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38.38 37.66 38.03 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25.34 36.56 30.66
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5.03 6.05 5.54 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.49 0.73 0.30
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.70 0.86 0.55 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 50 102
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 580
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:12 PM TO 12:35 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED32 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN AGUA MANSA RD AND S.LA CADENA DRIVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED32 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN AGUA MANSA RD AND S.LA CADENA DRIVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 1 0 57 X 1 0 1
56 0 2 56 XX 0 2 2 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 1 0 55 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 1 0 54 X 1 0 1 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 2 2 53 XXXX 2 2 4 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 1 2 52 XXX 1 2 3 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 3 4 51 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 5 50 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR 49 2 2 49 XXXX 2 2 4 * PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 4 6 48 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 P DEVELOPMENT:
47 7 7 47 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 A ADT: 0
46 8 7 46 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 7 15 C
45 6 5 45 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 E
44 3 1 44 XXXX 3 1 4 *
43 2 4 43 XXXXXX 2 4 6 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 3 1 42 XXXX 3 1 4 *
41 2 1 41 XXX 2 1 3
40 0 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 51.0 51.2 51.1 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 1 0 38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 47.0 47.5 47.3 M.P.H.
37 0 0 37 0 0 0
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 43.1 43.9 43.5 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 42 - 51 43 - 52 42 - 51 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 82% 86% 83%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 12% 8% 12%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 6% 6% 5%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 47.02 47.54 47.28 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14.50 12.29 13.34
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.81 3.51 3.65 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.25 0.13
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.50 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 50 101
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 581
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:45 AM TO 11:48 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED33 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN W.VALLEY BOULEVARD AND AGUA MANSA ROAD .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED33 RANCHO AVE BETWEEN W.VALLEY BOULEVARD AND AGUA MANSA ROAD . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 1 54 X 0 1 1 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 1 2 53 XXX 1 2 3 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 4 3 52 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 7 3 51 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 * EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 6 2 50 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 P DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR 49 3 4 49 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 A PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 5 3 48 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 C DEVELOPMENT:
47 3 1 47 XXXX 3 1 4 E ADT: 0
46 5 3 46 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
45 3 4 45 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
44 6 2 44 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 *
43 3 0 43 XXX 3 0 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 4 42 XXXXXX 2 4 6
41 0 5 41 XXXXX 0 5 5
40 1 4 40 XXXXX 1 4 5 85TH %: 51.0 50.0 50.7 M.P.H.
39 0 3 39 XXX 0 3 3
38 1 4 38 XXXXX 1 4 5 50TH %: 47.3 44.8 46.0 M.P.H.
37 0 2 37 XX 0 2 2
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 43.7 39.5 41.3 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 43 - 52 37 - 46 44 - 53 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 90% 62% 70%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 2% 38% 1%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 8% 0% 29%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 47.32 44.76 46.04 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 12.51 25.70 20.56
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.54 5.07 4.53 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.25 0.51 0.21
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.72 0.45 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 50 100
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 582
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:15 PM TO 12:35 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED34 RECHE CANYON ROAD BETWEEN WASHINGTON ST AND S. CITY LIMIT.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED34 RECHE CANYON ROAD BETWEEN WASHINGTON ST AND S. CITY LIMIT. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 1 0 58 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 1 56 X 0 1 1 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 1 2 54 XXX 1 2 3 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 2 0 53 XX 2 0 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 3 1 51 XXXX 3 1 4 * EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 1 50 XXXXX 4 1 5 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 6 6 49 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 * PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0 48 5 8 48 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 P DEVELOPMENT:
47 6 8 47 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 A ADT: 0
46 3 6 46 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 C
45 4 5 45 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 E
44 5 3 44 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
43 4 0 43 XXXX 4 0 4 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 2 5 42 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 *
41 4 0 41 XXXX 4 0 4
40 0 2 40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 50.8 50.3 50.5 M.P.H.
39 1 0 39 X 1 0 1
38 0 2 38 XX 0 2 2 50TH %: 46.1 45.9 46.0 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 3 0 36 XXX 3 0 3 15TH %: 41.5 41.6 41.6 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 1 34 X 0 1 1 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 42 - 51 42 - 51 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 80% 83% 80%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 13% 6% 7%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 7% 12% 13%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 46.15 45.94 46.05 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20.09 17.35 18.58
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.48 4.17 4.31 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.33 0.18
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.61 0.58 0.42 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
54 52 106
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 583
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 1:25 PM TO 1:45 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED35 RIVERSIDE AVE BETWEEN AGUA MANSA RD AND PLACENTIA LN .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED NB SB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED35 RIVERSIDE AVE BETWEEN AGUA MANSA RD AND PLACENTIA LN . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 1 0 61 X 1 0 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 50 MPH
60 1 1 60 XX 1 1 2 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 1 59 X 0 1 1 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 2 3 57 XXXXX 2 3 5
56 1 2 56 XXX 1 2 3 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 4 3 55 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 3 5 54 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 2 1 53 XXX 2 1 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 2 2 52 XXXX 2 2 4 * STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 7 4 51 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 * EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 6 5 50 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR 49 2 3 49 XXXXX 2 3 5 P PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 4 5 48 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 A DEVELOPMENT:
47 2 4 47 XXXXXX 2 4 6 C ADT: 0
46 4 3 46 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E
45 5 3 45 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
44 5 4 44 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
43 2 3 43 XXXXX 2 3 5 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 1 0 42 X 1 0 1
41 2 1 41 XXX 2 1 3
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 54.3 54.7 54.4 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 49.3 49.8 49.6 M.P.H.
37 0 0 37 0 0 0
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 44.4 45.0 44.7 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 44 - 53 43 - 52 43 - 52 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 70% 68% 69%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 21% 30% 28%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 9% 2% 4%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 49.34 49.85 49.59 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22.56 21.71 22.00
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.75 4.66 4.69 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.41 0.20
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.64 0.45 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
56 53 109
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 584
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:48 AM TO 11:48 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED36 RV CENTER DR BETWEEN 600 E WASHINGTON ST AND 1000 E WASHINGTON ST.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED36 RV CENTER DR BETWEEN 600 E WASHINGTON ST AND 1000 E WASHINGTON ST. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 0 42 0 0 0
41 0 0 41 0 0 0
40 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %: 30.3 30.6 30.5 M.P.H.
39 0 0 39 0 0 0
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 26.4 26.4 26.4 M.P.H.
37 0 1 37 X 0 1 1
36 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %: 22.5 22.1 22.3 M.P.H.
35 0 1 35 X 0 1 1
34 0 1 34 X 0 1 1 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 22 - 31 21 - 30 M.P.H. 33 2 0 33 XX 2 0 2
32 1 3 32 XXXX 1 3 4 % IN PACE: 85% 80% 82%
31 2 1 31 XXX 2 1 3
30 5 2 30 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 * % OVER PACE: 15% 14% 15%
29 1 4 29 XXXXX 1 4 5 *
28 3 3 28 XXXXXX 3 3 6 * % UNDER PACE: 0% 7% 3%
27 1 4 27 XXXXX 1 4 5 P
26 4 3 26 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 A ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26.41 26.39 26.40 M.P.H. 25 4 4 25 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 C
24 2 5 24 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 E SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13.89 16.89 15.39 23 2 4 23 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
22 3 5 22 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.73 4.11 3.92 M.P.H. 21 4 1 21 XXXXX 4 1 5 *
20 0 1 20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.38 0.20
19 0 1 19 X 0 1 1
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.64 0.62 0.44 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
34 44 78
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 585
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:52 AM TO 11:45AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED37 SAN BERNARDINO AVE BETWEEN N. PEPPER AVE AND MERIDIAN AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED37 SAN BERNARDINO AVE BETWEEN N. PEPPER AVE AND MERIDIAN AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 1 0 45 X 1 0 1
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 1 0 43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 2 4 42 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
41 1 3 41 XXXX 1 3 4 *
40 3 1 40 XXXX 3 1 4 * 85TH %: 39.8 39.8 39.8 M.P.H.
39 4 6 39 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 P
38 7 4 38 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 A 50TH %: 36.8 36.2 36.5 M.P.H. 37 8 7 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 7 15 C
36 9 5 36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 E 15TH %: 33.7 32.7 33.2 M.P.H. 35 5 3 35 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
34 4 6 34 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 3 4 33 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
32 2 2 32 XXXX 2 2 4 % IN PACE: 90% 86% 87%
31 2 3 31 XXXXX 2 3 5
30 0 1 30 X 0 1 1 % OVER PACE: 10% 0% 2%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 1 28 X 0 1 1 % UNDER PACE: 0% 14% 11%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36.75 36.24 36.50 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 8.78 11.82 10.23
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 2.96 3.44 3.20 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.17 0.24 0.10
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.49 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 50 102
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I I

11.a
Packet Pg. 586
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 12:03 PM TO 12:26 PM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED38 SAN BERNARDINO AVE BETWEEN N. SYCAMORE AVE AND N. PEPPER AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED38 SAN BERNARDINO AVE BETWEEN N. SYCAMORE AVE AND N. PEPPER AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 1 0 48 X 1 0 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 0 47 X 1 0 1 ADT: 0
46 0 2 46 XX 0 2 2
45 2 2 45 XXXX 2 2 4
44 4 3 44 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
43 3 4 43 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 4 5 42 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
41 3 6 41 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 P
40 5 7 40 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 A 85TH %: 43.3 43.1 43.2 M.P.H. 39 7 3 39 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 C
38 6 5 38 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 E 50TH %: 39.5 39.6 39.6 M.P.H. 37 4 4 37 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 *
36 5 3 36 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * 15TH %: 35.7 36.1 35.9 M.P.H. 35 2 5 35 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 *
34 0 2 34 XX 0 2 2 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 35 - 44 35 - 44 M.P.H. 33 2 0 33 XX 2 0 2
32 0 1 32 X 0 1 1 % IN PACE: 86% 87% 86%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 1 0 30 X 1 0 1 % OVER PACE: 4% 8% 8%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 10% 6% 6%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39.52 39.62 39.57 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13.40 11.61 12.37
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.66 3.41 3.52 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.27 0.22 0.12
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.52 0.47 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 52 102
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I I

11.a
Packet Pg. 587
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:08 AM TO 9:30 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED39 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN W.CITY LIMITS AND N. PEPPER AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED39 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN W.CITY LIMITS AND N. PEPPER AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 1 55 X 0 1 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 1 54 X 0 1 1 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 2 0 53 XX 2 0 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 1 0 52 X 1 0 1 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 3 1 51 XXXX 3 1 4 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 2 1 50 XXX 2 1 3 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 3 2 49 XXXXX 3 2 5 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 3 48 XXX 0 3 3 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 4 3 47 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 * ADT: 0
46 4 5 46 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
45 5 3 45 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 P
44 4 5 44 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 A
43 7 4 43 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 C EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 3 6 42 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 E
41 2 5 41 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 *
40 5 4 40 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * 85TH %: 48.9 48.0 48.5 M.P.H. 39 4 2 39 XXXXXX 4 2 6 *
38 0 3 38 XXX 0 3 3 50TH %: 44.3 43.4 43.8 M.P.H.
37 0 2 37 XX 0 2 2
36 2 0 36 XX 2 0 2 15TH %: 39.6 38.9 39.2 M.P.H.
35 0 1 35 X 0 1 1
34 0 1 34 X 0 1 1 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 40 - 49 39 - 48 M.P.H. 33 1 0 33 X 1 0 1
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 73% 75% 74%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 21% 8% 16%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 6% 17% 10%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 44.25 43.43 43.84 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20.39 19.44 19.89
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.52 4.41 4.46 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.37 0.19
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.61 0.44 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 53 105
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
II I

11.a
Packet Pg. 588
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:35 AM TO 9:54 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED40 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN N. PEPPER AVE AND N. RANCHO AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED40 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN N. PEPPER AVE AND N. RANCHO AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Mark
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 1 0 57 X 1 0 1
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 2 54 XX 0 2 2 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 1 52 X 0 1 1 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 2 0 51 XX 2 0 2 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 4 5 50 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR 49 8 4 49 XXXXXXXXXXXX 8 4 12 * PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0 48 3 5 48 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 * DEVELOPMENT:
47 5 6 47 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 P ADT: 0
46 7 6 46 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 A
45 4 2 45 XXXXXX 4 2 6 C
44 5 6 44 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 E
43 3 2 43 XXXXX 3 2 5 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 1 42 X 0 1 1 *
41 4 4 41 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 *
40 3 2 40 XXXXX 3 2 5 85TH %: 49.9 49.7 49.8 M.P.H.
39 0 5 39 XXXXX 0 5 5
38 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %: 45.9 45.4 45.6 M.P.H.
37 2 0 37 XX 2 0 2
36 0 1 36 X 0 1 1 15TH %: 41.9 41.1 41.5 M.P.H.
35 0 0 35 0 0 0
34 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 41 - 50 41 - 50 M.P.H. 33 0 0 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 84% 79% 82%
31 0 0 31 0 0 0
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 6% 6% 6%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 10% 15% 13%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 45.86 45.40 45.63 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14.88 16.95 15.82
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.86 4.12 3.98 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.33 0.15
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.57 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
51 52 103
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 2, 2022
COLTON
I

11.a
Packet Pg. 589
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:14 AM TO 9:35 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED41 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN N.RANCHO AVE AND N. MOUNT VERNON AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED41 VALLEY BLVD BETWEEN N.RANCHO AVE AND N. MOUNT VERNON AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Olga
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 1 0 43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 1 0 42 X 1 0 1
41 2 1 41 XXX 2 1 3
40 3 5 40 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 85TH %: 37.7 37.2 37.5 M.P.H. 39 2 4 39 XXXXXX 2 4 6
38 2 0 38 XX 2 0 2 50TH %: 32.9 31.7 32.3 M.P.H.
37 0 4 37 XXXX 0 4 4
36 4 0 36 XXXX 4 0 4 15TH %: 28.1 26.2 27.1 M.P.H.
35 4 3 35 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
34 3 2 34 XXXXX 3 2 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 25 - 34 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 3 2 33 XXXXX 3 2 5 *
32 4 2 32 XXXXXX 4 2 6 P % IN PACE: 75% 65% 65%
31 5 3 31 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 A
30 3 3 30 XXXXXX 3 3 6 C % OVER PACE: 21% 33% 28%
29 6 4 29 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 E
28 5 2 28 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 2% 7%
27 3 6 27 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 *
26 1 4 26 XXXXX 1 4 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32.92 31.73 32.34 M.P.H. 25 1 5 25 XXXXXX 1 5 6
24 0 1 24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21.65 28.32 25.04
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.65 5.32 5.00 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.56 0.24
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.64 0.75 0.49 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
53 51 104
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Thursday, March 10, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 590
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:23 AM TO 10:38 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED42 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN WEST END AND S. MT VERNON AVE .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED42 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN WEST END AND S. MT VERNON AVE . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 0 0 48 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 0 0 46 0 0 0
45 0 0 45 0 0 0
44 0 0 44 0 0 0
43 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 1 42 X 0 1 1
41 3 0 41 XXX 3 0 3
40 0 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 37.9 36.8 37.3 M.P.H.
39 3 0 39 XXX 3 0 3
38 0 2 38 XX 0 2 2 50TH %: 34.0 32.7 33.3 M.P.H.
37 7 4 37 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 *
36 6 5 36 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 * 15TH %: 30.1 28.6 29.3 M.P.H. 35 5 5 35 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
34 7 6 34 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 P 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 3 7 33 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 A
32 2 3 32 XXXXX 2 3 5 C % IN PACE: 84% 81% 82%
31 4 3 31 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 E
30 1 0 30 X 1 0 1 * % OVER PACE: 12% 8% 10%
29 3 4 29 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
28 4 5 28 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 12% 8%
27 2 3 27 XXXXX 2 3 5
26 0 1 26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33.96 32.65 33.29 M.P.H. 25 0 2 25 XX 0 2 2
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14.16 15.64 15.20
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.76 3.96 3.90 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.30 0.15
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.55 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
50 52 102
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 591
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 10:34 AM TO 10:54 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED43 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN S. MT VERNON AVE AND RECHE CANYON RD .

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED43 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN S. MT VERNON AVE AND RECHE CANYON RD . 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 1 0 53 X 1 0 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 1 52 X 0 1 1 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 0 51 0 0 0 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 0 49 0 0 0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 1 0 48 X 1 0 1 DEVELOPMENT:
47 1 0 47 X 1 0 1 ADT: 0
46 0 4 46 XXXX 0 4 4
45 2 3 45 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
44 6 5 44 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 *
43 5 4 43 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 7 6 42 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 P
41 5 5 41 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 A
40 6 7 40 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 C 85TH %: 44.7 44.8 44.7 M.P.H. 39 5 4 39 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 E
38 4 2 38 XXXXXX 4 2 6 * 50TH %: 40.6 40.8 40.7 M.P.H. 37 5 4 37 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
36 3 2 36 XXXXX 3 2 5 * 15TH %: 36.5 36.8 36.7 M.P.H. 35 1 3 35 XXXX 1 3 4
34 1 0 34 X 1 0 1 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 37 - 46 36 - 45 M.P.H. 33 0 1 33 X 0 1 1
32 0 0 32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 89% 85% 85%
31 0 1 31 X 0 1 1
30 0 0 30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 6% 2% 8%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 6% 13% 8%
27 1 0 27 X 1 0 1
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40.59 40.79 40.69 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 15.68 14.92 15.17
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3.96 3.86 3.89 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.29 0.14
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.54 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
54 52 106
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Tuesday, March 8, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 592
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y

DATA ENTRY COLUMNS CITY OF
DIST.(MI.)= 0.00 DATE: TIME PERIOD : 9:55 AM TO 10:15 AM # OF ACC.= 0 SPEED44 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN RECHE CANYON RD AND WATERMAN AVE.

SPEED TOTAL
SPEED EB WB (MPH) TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SPEED44 WASHINGTON ST BETWEEN RECHE CANYON RD AND WATERMAN AVE. 65 0 0 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVER: Ed
63 0 0 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 62 0 0 0 WEATHER: SUNNY
61 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH
60 0 0 60 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: DRY
59 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:
58 0 0 58 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: GOOD
57 0 0 57 0 0 0
56 0 0 56 0 0 0 ROAD SEGMENT LENGTH:
55 0 0 55 0 0 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0.00
54 0 0 54 0 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES:
53 0 0 53 0 0 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0
52 0 0 52 0 0 0 STREET WIDTH (Ft.):
51 0 1 51 X 0 1 1 EXPECTED RATE: 0
50 0 0 50 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: RADAR
49 0 2 49 XX 0 2 2 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: 0
48 3 0 48 XXX 3 0 3 DEVELOPMENT:
47 0 0 47 0 0 0 ADT: 0
46 1 0 46 X 1 0 1
45 2 1 45 XXX 2 1 3
44 3 2 44 XXXXX 3 2 5
43 0 3 43 XXX 0 3 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 4 4 42 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 *
41 5 6 41 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 *
40 6 6 40 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 * 85TH %: 43.5 43.6 43.5 M.P.H. 39 4 7 39 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 P
38 5 6 38 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 A 50TH %: 39.0 39.4 39.2 M.P.H. 37 6 4 37 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 C
36 1 3 36 XXXX 1 3 4 E 15TH %: 34.4 35.1 34.8 M.P.H.
35 3 0 35 XXX 3 0 3 *
34 2 3 34 XXXXX 2 3 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 36 - 45 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 4 3 33 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 *
32 1 2 32 XXX 1 2 3 % IN PACE: 77% 79% 78%
31 1 0 31 X 1 0 1
30 1 0 30 X 1 0 1 % OVER PACE: 17% 6% 17%
29 0 0 29 0 0 0
28 0 0 28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 6% 15% 5%
27 0 0 27 0 0 0
26 0 0 26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38.98 39.38 39.18 M.P.H. 25 0 0 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19.12 16.66 17.75
23 0 0 23 0 0 0
22 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4.37 4.08 4.21 M.P.H. 21 0 0 21 0 0 0
20 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.31 0.17
19 0 0 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.61 0.56 0.41 M.P.H. 17 0 0 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 16 0 0 0
15 0 0 15 0 0 0
52 53 105
[email protected] Prepared by AimTD tel. 714 253.7888
LOCATION:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022
COLTON

11.a
Packet Pg. 593
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-

Appendix C: Radar Certifications

11.a
Packet Pg. 594
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) -
R F

TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION -
Inc.

TES1'ED 1'0 NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS/ IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration. Radar Repair (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police. ~ .
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.

Westminster, Calif. 92683
1 TEST ID Date ~:iz~ -I 1
Certification N~.t/ / y -z...

Make • Type (1-IV) Directional radar Same direction Model Decatur Genesis VP or VPD III
~
□ No o Yes ;a"'No 2 DEVICE ID
.AJ 1 es
CountiZ. unit SIN Antenna-I SIN NIA Antenna-2 SIN NIA rJ S'S-7 - § 2.4 / § 5.4 L21;~47or; pr Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) Sp1..f1 ph) M~~~z) r ...,_ 3 TUNING FORK PASS, FAIL
H1 hlz.d $~~ Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) Spe~Cr, h) N1e? ed1Hz) ..... ~ CALIBRATION \ "<J 6
. . .. . - ' . . ., . . "· . Lo fork Hi!!h fork . . - . ' . . . ' / . .

J
Fork speed (mph) . 33 77 . ~ Stationary mode ,
• § 2.5 I§ 5.5 ' Disp. Speed (mph) 3'3 77 RADA.R DEVICE @ 4 Expected. Displayed. FAIL TUNING FORK Moving mode TARGET SPEED (mph) (mph) NIA TESTS Opposite Direction (Hi fork - Lo fork) Moving mode TAR GET SPEED Expected. Displayed.

Hi fork + Lo fork (mph) (mph) NIA Same Direction Hi fork - Lo fork Standard supply Antenna 1
Z'/'-!2G
Antenna2
§ 2.6.1. / § 5.6.1 Voltae:e (V) 7.2 V Frea. GHz Frea. GHz NIA . 5 TRANSMISSION Standard supply Antenna l Antenna2 r I FAIL FREQUENCY Voltage - 20% (V) 6.2 V Frec1. GHz N/4 Freo. GHz NIA iy AS~ STABILITY Standard supply Antenna 1 Antenna2
voltae:e + 20% (V) 8.6 V Frea. GHz IV/A Frea. GHz NIA
§ 2.6.5 I§ 5.6.5 Mfg. Spec. Antenna 1
~
Antenna2
~/J
r
6 I PAS FAIL POWER DENSITY (max mW/cm) < 2 Power (mW/cm) Power (mW/cm) N/A Mfg. spec. L VA activates L VA deactivates '
7 § 2.8 / § 5.8
N/A N/'1 PASS FAIL LOW VOLTAGE (V) < 6.2 V (V) (V) co
§ 2.9.l / § 5.9.1 A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal ~ Yes □ No ~:PAS~ ;'" .
8 F4IL DOPPLER AUDIO B. Functioning audio volume-adjustment control .a"Yes □ No . § 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4 Mfg. Spec. Test results
@_p
.
• 9 INTERNAL PASS /JA.s.J FAIL

CIRCUIT '
§2.12.6.5/§ A. Selects only targets moving towards radar .r{ es □ No □ N.A. ~ - '
10 5.12.6.5 B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ..wYes □ No D N.A.· PASS I FAIL "'" ~

DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode: Low speed spec. 5 Lo speed disp. s-
target channel (mph) Hi speed spec. 200 Hi speed disp. 2 01:1 § 2.12.7 I§ 2.12.8 /
NIA NIA 5.12.7 / 5.12.8 Moving Mode Low speed spec. Lo speed disp.

GA~ 11 LOW AND HIGH target channel (mph) FAIL
SPEED DISPLAY Hi speed spec. NIA Hi speed <lisp. NIA
TEST .

NIA
-
NIA-
.

Low speed spec. Lo speed <lisp. - -Moving Mode:
patrol channel (mph) Hi speed spec. NIA Hi speed disp. NIA a. ' '
. - .. - -- . .. - '
§2.13/§5.13
' (Jr •
12 ...._PAS-~) FAIL RFI TEST .
- -- "· · .
13 LABORATORY

COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 ,...Jd"t?ASS □ FAIL 14 NHTSA/IACP

CERTIFICATIO'N
--Certified by: z /~
Date: J'-ZC/_- /1 • ----1 I - ,. '
o Fork Cert I o Manual D 2nd Ant. • D Remote o Bat.
. . '
15 INVENTORY .
o Cru 1 vine: Case o Other: (olease list)
.
> • .
'
.
. ..

11.a
Packet Pg. 595
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) (((R!!F

TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
Inc. TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIF ICATlONS / IACP CRITICAL PERFORMAN CE STANDARDS (NHTSA) 1tioul Highwa y and Traffic Safety Admini stration. (lACP) luternation•I Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independ ent testing and repair facility.

Westminster, Calif. 92683
I TEST ID Date: Received ~-/ R- / 1 Certification Number/~? t? / Make Model I Type(l-lV) Directional radar I Same direction 2 DEVICE ID De<:atur Genesis VP or VPD lJl v'Yes □ No □ Yes lil"'No Counting unit? S" Antenna-I SIN NIA Anteona-2 SIN NIA r,-7 - q § 2.4 I§ 5.4 Low speed fork SIN Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) Speed (mph) Measured (Hz) 3 TUNING FORK
~o'7dJoU/N Last da1e calib. Freq. (Hz) s~~m ph) Meas_r~~ @ FAIL

CALIBRATION
Lo fork Hi,:!.h fork
Fork speed (mph) JJ 77
Stationary mode
§ 2.5 I§ 5.5 Disp. Speed (mph) 3] 77 @ 4 RADAR DEVICE Expected. Displayed. FAIL TUNING FORK Moving mode TAR GET SPEED TESTS Opposite Direction (Hi fork- Lo fork) (mph) (mph) NIA Moving mode TARGET SPEED Expected. Displayed.

Hi fork + Lo fork (mph) (mph) NIA Same Direction Hi fork - Lo fork Standard supply Antenna I
z <./. /.5'7-
Antenna2
§ 2,6.l. I§ 5.6.1 Voltage (V) 7.2 V Freq. GHz Freq. GHz NIA 5 TRANSMISSION Standard supply Antenna I
NJ/J
Antenna2
(§; FAJL FREQUENCY Voltage- 20% (V) 6.2 V Freq. GHz Freq. GHz NIA STABlLITY Standard supply Antenna I
N IA
Antenna 2
vollal!e + 20% (V) 8.6 V Freq. GHz Frea. GHz NIA
§ 2.6.5 I § 5.6.5 Mfg. Spec. Antenna I Antenna2
@ FAIL 6 POWER DENSITY (maxmW lcm) :S 2 Power (mW/cm) , .J e./ Power (mW/cm) N/A 7 § 2.81 § 5.8 Mfg. spec. L VA activates
N/4
L VA deactivates
N/4 PASS FAfL LOW VOLTAGE (V) < 6.2 V (V) (V)
8 § 2.9.1 I§ 5.9.1 A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal f!l'Yes □ No ~ FAIL DOPPLER AUDIO B. Functioning audio volume-adiustment control flf'Yes □ No § 2.12.41 § 5.12.4 Mfg. Spec. I Test results
/J,4Sf @ 9 INTERNAL PASS FAJL

CIRCUIT
§ 2.12.6.5 I§ A Selects only targets moving towards radar -WYes □ No □ N.A. (§) 10 5.12.6.5 B. Selects only targets moving away from radar .vYes □ No □ N.A FAIL DfRECTlONAL
Stationary mode: Low speed spec. s Lo speed disp. s-
target channel (mph) Hi speed spec. 200 Hi speed disp. ZOt/ § 2.12.7 / § 2.12.8 I
NIA NIA 5.12.7 /5. 12.8 Moving Mode Low speed spec. Lo speed disp. e
11 LOW AND HIGH target channel (mph) FAJL
SPEED DISPLAY Hi speed spec. NIA Hi speed disp. NIA
TEST
NIA NIA Moving Mode: Low speed spec. Lo speed disp.
patrol channel (mph) Hi speed spec. NIA Hi speed disp. NIA 12 §2.13 /§5.13 (PAss) FAIL RFI TEST
13 LABORATORY

COMMENTS
TJ,is radar device meets or exceeds tl,e mittimal operational sta11dards of the Natio11a/ Traffic Highway Safety Admillistra tion. California Ve/ride Code Section 40801 ,,d PASS D FAIL 14 NHTSA/IACP

CERTIFICATION
Certified by: -1,. 7-?~
Date: 6-lcf -/9 I
o Fork Cert . o Manual □ 2""Ant. □ Remote a BaL
I 15 fNVENTORY o Carrvine. Case □ Other: (olease list)

11.a
Packet Pg. 596
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) R F

IRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
Inc.

TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS/ IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Admini5~&tion. ' . .

Radar Repair (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police . • .
16202 Keats Circle . R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility .

Westminster, Calif. 92683
1 TEST ID Date R~ eived ·J c: . -7"1-- t
Certification Number
/ YS-L/8'
Make Model Type (I-IV) Directional radar Same direction . 2 DEVICE ID Decatur Genesis VP or VPD Ill ,#!!"Yes □ No □ Yes r7·No Cou~z:nit SIN Antenna-I SIN NIA Antenna-2 S/N NIA
<=' "'--
§ 2.4 / § 5.4 ~'t speed f<;>~ SIN Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) Sp~ dt ph) Measured (Hzt, .;., 7 7. . 7 7<~ @ 3 TUNING FORK FAIL High speed fork SIN Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) Speed (mph) - .

CALIBRATION Measured (Hz)
--, ~
- - ~- .. ·<
. ~: . ' ·:-·-. ~· .. :. ~ . Lo fork Hig-h fork
Fork speed (mph) 33 77
•
Stationary mode
§ 2.5 I§ 5.5 Disp. Speed (mph) "33' 71
9 4 RADAR DEVICE Expected. Displayed. FAIL TUNING FORK Moving mode TARGET SPEED (mph) (mph) NIA TESTS Opposite Direction (Hi fork - Lo fork) Moving mode TARGET SPEED Expected. Displayed.

I-Ii fork + Lo fork (mph) (mph) NIA Same Direction Hi fork - Lo fork Standard supply Antenna 1
Zc/. 13 I
Antenna2
§ 2.6.1. / § 5.6.1 Volta11e (V) 7.2 V Frea. GHz Frea. GHz NIA 5 TRANSMISSION Standard supply Antenna 1
NILJ
Antenna2
9 FAIL FREQUENCY Volta!!e - 20% (V) 6.2 V Freo. GHz Frea. GHz NIA STABILITY Standard supply Antenna I
AJ/,4
Antenna2
voltag-e + 20% (V) 8.6 V Frea. GHz Frea. GHz NIA
§ 2.6.5 I§ 5.6.5 Mfg. Spec. Antenna 1 Antenna2 @ 6 · It FAIL POWER DENSITY (max mW/cm) < 2 Power (mW/cm) Power (mW/cm) N/A 7 § 2.8 / § 5.8 Mfg. spec. L VA activates
N)A
L VA deactivates
N/A PASS FAIL LOW VOLTAGE (V) < 6.2 V (V) (V) d
8 § 2.9.1 I§ 5.9.I A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal ,l,!f"Y°es □ No <§) FAIL DOPPLER AUDIO B. Functioning audio volume-adiustment control J;lf'Yes □ No •
§ 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4 Mfg. Spec. Test results ., :..
9 INTERNAL PASS p,4.r.r
! PASS I FAIL ~ ~

CIRCUIT
§ 2.12.6.5 I§ A. Selects only targets moving towards radar .R!"'{es □ No □ N.A / .. 10 5.12.6.5 B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ;;;,,Yes □ No □ N.A. !'"-PAS~ FAIL

DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode: Low speed spec. 5 Lo speed <lisp. s-
target channel (mph) Hi speed spec. 200 Hi speed <lisp. Zt:Jt) ✓ - § 2.12. 7 I § 2.12.8 I
NIA NIA 5.12.7 I 5.12.8 Lo"v speed spec. Lo speed disp. Moving Mode / .. 11 LOW AND HIGH 1-.,._PASS ... t FAIL target channel (mph) NIA NIA SPEED DISPLAY Hi speed spec. Hi speed <lisp.

TEST .

NIA
j
NIA -
Moving Mode: Low speed spec. Lo speed disp.
patrol channel (mph) Hi speed spec. NIA Hi speed disp. NIA . , . . . ;-: ~L ---.:,----,- . ' ' - ._;:
§ 2.13 / § 5.13 Q>AS~) 12 FAIL RFI TEST •
" '
. . :e . . ..
13 LABORATORY

COMMENTS
This radar device meets or ex,ceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 J21>ASS □ FAIL 14 NHTSNIACP

CERTIFICATION
-
Certified by: - y Date:
<f'-29-/9 & -'/. - -~ A ... ·• ~-•
o Fork Cert .. o Manual 0 2nd Ant.
'
o Remote o Bat. . . '
15 fNVENTORY ...
o C;i1Tving Case o Other: (nlease list)
.
> •
'
•
. •

11.a
Packet Pg. 597
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) 1/10/2017 AIM TD 1.jpg
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/155284369b9a8d13?projector=1 1/1 -
,§::::~~~ -- ~::::-~ ..-r-~
§~VQ'~ , , . '~),wJ.a~~:~

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT-

1. Manuel E. Sanchez of AimTD LLC has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration , California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

2. Manuel E. Sanchez completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

3. Manuel E. Sanchez, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of a radar device, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

4. Manuel E. Sanchez demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

5. Manuel E. Sanchez of AimTD LLC is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 3rd day of January, 2017.
~
Stev~
P.O.S.T. Certified Radar Instructor
-~~ . . ,. . ,. ..
-

11.a
Packet Pg. 598
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23)

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT -

1. Mark Polunin of AimTD LLC has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code.

2. Mark Polunin completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

3. Mark Polunin, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of a radar device, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

4. Mark Polunin demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings.

5. Mark Polunin AimTD LLC is recognized for his competence as a Radar Operator this 1st day of July, 2019.

Steve Chauncey
P.O.S.T. Certified Radar Instructor

11.a
Packet Pg. 599
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23)

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT -

1. Olga Polunin of AimTD LLC has successfully completed a course for Traffic Engineers on the operation of Radar devices in application with Traffic and Engineering Speed Surveys as outlined in the California Vehicle Code and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This ~~K:~~,11 course is based upon the standards as outlined by the National Highway Mt'1,l(NJD.6a~a\\ Traffic Safety Administration, California Commission on P.O.S.T standards and Section 40802 of the Califomia Vehicle Code.

2. Olga Polunin completed the classroom instruction on operation and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, the California Vehicle Code as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

3. Olga Polunin, in field settings demonstrated competence in the test and set-up of a radar device, operation and trouble shooting of the device and correct evaluation of readings provided by the device.

4. Olga Polunin demonstrated competence in making visual speed estimations in actual field settings .

5. Olga Poh,min of AimTD LLC is recognized for her competence as a Radar Operator this 20th day of June, 2016.

Steve C auncey
P.O.S.T. Certified Radar Instructor

11.a
Packet Pg. 600
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23)

Appendix D: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes

11.a
Packet Pg. 601
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 11 18 12:00 59 55
0:15 14 25 12:15 51 55
0:30 6 19 12:30 52 75
0:45 5 36 8 70 106 12:45 69 231 57 242 473
1:00 4 20 13:00 51 50
1:15 7 22 13:15 45 82
1:30 6 13 13:30 60 128
1:45 15 32 12 67 99 13:45 56 212 88 348 560
2:00 14 9 14:00 60 89
2:15 17 10 14:15 52 81
2:30 12 6 14:30 63 123
2:45 16 59 14 39 98 14:45 87 262 130 423 685
3:00 14 12 15:00 63 128
3:15 15 4 15:15 81 139
3:30 24 4 15:30 96 230
3:45 41 94 2 22 116 15:45 91 331 144 641 972
4:00 29 23 16:00 60 148
4:15 21 13 16:15 49 117
4:30 19 12 16:30 51 136
4:45 23 92 13 61 153 16:45 48 208 120 521 729
5:00 43 20 17:00 44 113
5:15 46 20 17:15 56 102
5:30 62 24 17:30 58 104
5:45 89 240 35 99 339 17:45 54 212 121 440 652
6:00 70 27 18:00 37 70
6:15 52 50 18:15 33 64
6:30 92 66 18:30 20 52
6:45 94 308 112 255 563 18:45 22 112 45 231 343
7:00 53 163 19:00 23 45
7:15 68 149 19:15 25 34
7:30 90 99 19:30 16 39
7:45 90 301 79 490 791 19:45 23 87 34 152 239
8:00 76 116 20:00 14 21
8:15 60 68 20:15 13 24
8:30 67 52 20:30 11 25
8:45 47 250 63 299 549 20:45 12 50 20 90 140
9:00 52 30 21:00 5 13
9:15 45 49 21:15 11 9
9:30 45 54 21:30 13 14
9:45 55 197 45 178 375 21:45 13 42 18 54 96
10:00 36 46 22:00 13 28
10:15 53 47 22:15 8 10
10:30 38 46 22:30 9 13
10:45 38 165 52 191 356 22:45 7 37 13 64 101
11:00 37 48 23:00 6 18
11:15 31 51 23:15 7 25
11:30 53 31 23:30 8 24
11:45 50 171 58 188 359 23:45 7 28 13 80 108
Total Vol. 1945 1959 3904 1812 3286 5098
EB WB Combined
3757 5245 9002
Split % 49.8% 50.2% 43.4% 35.5% 64.5% 56.6%
Peak Hour 7:15 6:45 6:45 15:00 15:15 15:15
Volume 324 523 828 331 661 989
P.H.F. 0.90 0.80 0.95 0.86 0.72 0.76
Daily Totals
AM PM
Wednesday, February 23, 2022
ADT1 Agua Mansa Rd between S Riverside Ave and S Rancho Ave AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

11.a
Packet Pg. 602
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 11 5 12:00 119 91
0:15 4 3 12:15 156 101
0:30 2 5 12:30 145 130
0:45 3 20 4 17 37 12:45 138 558 76 398 956
1:00 2 6 13:00 126 114
1:15 6 10 13:15 122 101
1:30 2 3 13:30 103 135
1:45 2 12 0 19 31 13:45 126 477 120 470 947
2:00 5 1 14:00 138 100
2:15 1 3 14:15 149 118
2:30 2 3 14:30 140 177
2:45 4 12 7 14 26 14:45 138 565 191 586 1151
3:00 3 0 15:00 137 154
3:15 5 5 15:15 141 163
3:30 10 5 15:30 160 157
3:45 2 20 5 15 35 15:45 208 646 181 655 1301
4:00 6 3 16:00 192 180
4:15 4 21 16:15 174 189
4:30 6 49 16:30 189 171
4:45 17 33 73 146 179 16:45 172 727 165 705 1432
5:00 12 77 17:00 176 130
5:15 18 93 17:15 209 144
5:30 15 165 17:30 181 162
5:45 23 68 194 529 597 17:45 170 736 127 563 1299
6:00 24 218 18:00 139 118
6:15 38 246 18:15 120 133
6:30 68 252 18:30 93 120
6:45 122 252 297 1013 1265 18:45 73 425 86 457 882
7:00 152 330 19:00 77 69
7:15 144 289 19:15 59 53
7:30 135 328 19:30 62 45
7:45 166 597 311 1258 1855 19:45 70 268 48 215 483
8:00 132 304 20:00 44 33
8:15 81 217 20:15 38 31
8:30 88 137 20:30 45 31
8:45 91 392 137 795 1187 20:45 33 160 24 119 279
9:00 71 74 21:00 17 40
9:15 76 99 21:15 26 30
9:30 68 98 21:30 24 19
9:45 72 287 67 338 625 21:45 24 91 22 111 202
10:00 63 66 22:00 13 23
10:15 80 77 22:15 19 21
10:30 68 85 22:30 25 13
10:45 68 279 76 304 583 22:45 19 76 21 78 154
11:00 108 90 23:00 11 13
11:15 82 94 23:15 8 13
11:30 102 84 23:30 12 7
11:45 101 393 107 375 768 23:45 7 38 7 40 78
Total Vol. 2365 4823 7188 4767 4397 9164
EB WB Combined
7132 9220 16352
Split % 32.9% 67.1% 44.0% 52.0% 48.0% 56.0%
Peak Hour 7:00 7:00 7:00 15:45 15:45 15:45
Volume 597 1258 1855 763 721 1484
P.H.F. 0.90 0.95 0.96 0.92 0.95 0.95
Wednesday, February 23, 2022
ADT2 Barton Rd betw een Hilltop Dr and W ashington St AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected] Daily Totals
AM PM

11.a
Packet Pg. 603
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 15 9 12:00 65 81
0:15 3 4 12:15 96 69
0:30 9 6 12:30 96 64
0:45 2 29 2 21 50 12:45 80 337 74 288 625
1:00 4 4 13:00 69 68
1:15 11 4 13:15 73 64
1:30 6 3 13:30 80 57
1:45 3 24 2 13 37 13:45 66 288 55 244 532
2:00 3 7 14:00 91 65
2:15 3 0 14:15 76 65
2:30 8 2 14:30 82 72
2:45 3 17 3 12 29 14:45 75 324 82 284 608
3:00 6 3 15:00 114 77
3:15 4 1 15:15 60 81
3:30 6 4 15:30 91 84
3:45 5 21 5 13 34 15:45 73 338 100 342 680
4:00 11 5 16:00 111 81
4:15 17 7 16:15 77 107
4:30 41 7 16:30 88 97
4:45 67 136 9 28 164 16:45 66 342 95 380 722
5:00 87 14 17:00 89 92
5:15 104 12 17:15 94 107
5:30 140 14 17:30 79 83
5:45 135 466 29 69 535 17:45 96 358 79 361 719
6:00 103 39 18:00 85 78
6:15 119 53 18:15 69 73
6:30 121 70 18:30 53 57
6:45 145 488 74 236 724 18:45 38 245 53 261 506
7:00 118 139 19:00 45 45
7:15 158 176 19:15 32 29
7:30 124 93 19:30 35 26
7:45 156 556 113 521 1077 19:45 26 138 19 119 257
8:00 99 102 20:00 18 16
8:15 71 73 20:15 34 25
8:30 66 64 20:30 28 33
8:45 48 284 45 284 568 20:45 35 115 12 86 201
9:00 42 31 21:00 21 25
9:15 34 33 21:15 21 14
9:30 38 28 21:30 18 16
9:45 48 162 41 133 295 21:45 9 69 11 66 135
10:00 43 45 22:00 11 11
10:15 47 47 22:15 12 9
10:30 43 49 22:30 16 15
10:45 48 181 53 194 375 22:45 13 52 10 45 97
11:00 53 67 23:00 9 5
11:15 64 49 23:15 10 7
11:30 57 62 23:30 5 11
11:45 69 243 69 247 490 23:45 8 32 4 27 59
Total Vol. 2607 1771 4378 2638 2503 5141
EB WB Combined
5245 4274 9519
Split % 59.5% 40.5% 46.0% 51.3% 48.7% 54.0%
Peak Hour 7:00 7:00 7:00 17:00 16:15 15:45
Volume 556 521 1077 358 391 734
P.H.F. 0.88 0.74 0.81 0.93 0.91 0.96
Wednesday, February 23, 2022
ADT3 Barton Rd between S La Cadena Dr and E City Limits UPRR AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected] Daily Totals
AM PM

11.a
Packet Pg. 604
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 2 1 12:00 26 32
0:15 0 0 12:15 33 39
0:30 4 2 12:30 35 35
0:45 2 8 0 3 11 12:45 32 126 31 137 263
1:00 3 1 13:00 28 40
1:15 2 0 13:15 39 55
1:30 0 1 13:30 38 44
1:45 2 7 1 3 10 13:45 28 133 53 192 325
2:00 1 2 14:00 44 62
2:15 0 4 14:15 48 92
2:30 2 3 14:30 87 72
2:45 3 6 4 13 19 14:45 51 230 57 283 513
3:00 1 1 15:00 48 62
3:15 2 0 15:15 39 57
3:30 0 6 15:30 38 56
3:45 2 5 3 10 15 15:45 60 185 58 233 418
4:00 3 2 16:00 69 71
4:15 2 4 16:15 46 53
4:30 7 1 16:30 58 62
4:45 9 21 9 16 37 16:45 51 224 56 242 466
5:00 7 10 17:00 50 63
5:15 7 9 17:15 43 71
5:30 7 14 17:30 61 54
5:45 8 29 10 43 72 17:45 45 199 61 249 448
6:00 5 9 18:00 39 45
6:15 12 11 18:15 29 29
6:30 20 13 18:30 18 29
6:45 38 75 20 53 128 18:45 23 109 26 129 238
7:00 66 55 19:00 22 30
7:15 82 58 19:15 24 22
7:30 49 61 19:30 18 18
7:45 56 253 56 230 483 19:45 16 80 26 96 176
8:00 38 30 20:00 15 23
8:15 33 28 20:15 14 19
8:30 25 39 20:30 10 13
8:45 22 118 35 132 250 20:45 5 44 12 67 111
9:00 34 27 21:00 13 9
9:15 28 22 21:15 9 11
9:30 28 18 21:30 8 12
9:45 35 125 24 91 216 21:45 12 42 7 39 81
10:00 36 31 22:00 10 9
10:15 45 35 22:15 5 5
10:30 25 32 22:30 6 7
10:45 32 138 34 132 270 22:45 7 28 11 32 60
11:00 27 35 23:00 5 3
11:15 33 33 23:15 2 1
11:30 43 35 23:30 3 1
11:45 34 137 50 153 290 23:45 4 14 4 9 23
Total Vol. 922 879 1801 1414 1708 3122
EB WB Combined
2336 2587 4923
Split % 51.2% 48.8% 36.6% 45.3% 54.7% 63.4%
Peak Hour 7:00 7:00 7:00 14:15 14:00 14:15
Volume 253 230 483 234 283 517
P.H.F. 0.77 0.94 0.86 0.67 0.77 0.81
Tuesday, February 22, 2022
ADT4 C St betw een N Rancho Ave and Colton Ave AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected] Daily Totals
AM PM

11.a
Packet Pg. 605
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 5 4 12:00 52 73
0:15 2 5 12:15 49 50
0:30 7 5 12:30 65 58
0:45 4 18 6 20 38 12:45 59 225 73 254 479
1:00 5 6 13:00 62 63
1:15 8 7 13:15 75 58
1:30 6 5 13:30 71 72
1:45 2 21 4 22 43 13:45 56 264 63 256 520
2:00 7 6 14:00 64 95
2:15 4 5 14:15 61 74
2:30 2 3 14:30 101 82
2:45 4 17 8 22 39 14:45 93 319 83 334 653
3:00 4 1 15:00 97 70
3:15 4 9 15:15 107 90
3:30 7 7 15:30 75 81
3:45 9 24 9 26 50 15:45 90 369 86 327 696
4:00 2 19 16:00 95 94
4:15 6 10 16:15 104 65
4:30 10 23 16:30 99 83
4:45 6 24 14 66 90 16:45 85 383 77 319 702
5:00 8 13 17:00 107 87
5:15 15 16 17:15 88 80
5:30 19 19 17:30 92 72
5:45 12 54 20 68 122 17:45 77 364 85 324 688
6:00 13 30 18:00 84 64
6:15 16 29 18:15 69 45
6:30 17 19 18:30 55 50
6:45 16 62 43 121 183 18:45 38 246 41 200 446
7:00 37 73 19:00 50 46
7:15 82 60 19:15 42 51
7:30 61 93 19:30 33 40
7:45 64 244 81 307 551 19:45 33 158 33 170 328
8:00 36 61 20:00 36 37
8:15 39 52 20:15 31 31
8:30 39 47 20:30 23 25
8:45 32 146 51 211 357 20:45 19 109 22 115 224
9:00 35 45 21:00 22 24
9:15 39 53 21:15 21 19
9:30 41 46 21:30 15 20
9:45 54 169 42 186 355 21:45 12 70 10 73 143
10:00 37 56 22:00 12 20
10:15 50 44 22:15 17 12
10:30 50 57 22:30 9 13
10:45 49 186 52 209 395 22:45 12 50 6 51 101
11:00 56 54 23:00 7 6
11:15 52 56 23:15 4 5
11:30 65 48 23:30 11 3
11:45 52 225 57 215 440 23:45 4 26 5 19 45
Total Vol. 1190 1473 2663 2583 2442 5025
EB WB Combined
3773 3915 7688
Split % 44.7% 55.3% 34.6% 51.4% 48.6% 65.4%
Peak Hour 7:00 7:00 7:00 14:30 15:15 14:30
Volume 244 307 551 398 351 723
P.H.F. 0.74 0.83 0.89 0.93 0.93 0.92
Daily Totals
AM PM
Tuesday, February 22, 2022
ADT5 Colton Ave between North City Limit and E St AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

11.a
Packet Pg. 606
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 13 1 12:00 32 34
0:15 5 3 12:15 29 28
0:30 7 5 12:30 25 36
0:45 7 32 3 12 44 12:45 37 123 37 135 258
1:00 5 3 13:00 40 38
1:15 4 5 13:15 57 27
1:30 5 7 13:30 43 43
1:45 8 22 3 18 40 13:45 56 196 45 153 349
2:00 4 2 14:00 51 44
2:15 5 8 14:15 64 38
2:30 6 5 14:30 68 64
2:45 5 20 8 23 43 14:45 67 250 44 190 440
3:00 2 6 15:00 79 38
3:15 6 9 15:15 45 42
3:30 8 12 15:30 73 36
3:45 8 24 13 40 64 15:45 61 258 35 151 409
4:00 12 4 16:00 73 26
4:15 13 11 16:15 50 40
4:30 15 23 16:30 66 31
4:45 9 49 35 73 122 16:45 76 265 32 129 394
5:00 10 27 17:00 74 29
5:15 21 40 17:15 81 32
5:30 27 30 17:30 61 41
5:45 39 97 47 144 241 17:45 60 276 29 131 407
6:00 29 33 18:00 52 19
6:15 16 32 18:15 38 19
6:30 19 43 18:30 39 29
6:45 33 97 46 154 251 18:45 18 147 19 86 233
7:00 31 45 19:00 22 22
7:15 23 27 19:15 37 18
7:30 26 31 19:30 24 16
7:45 37 117 43 146 263 19:45 27 110 12 68 178
8:00 36 34 20:00 20 11
8:15 35 31 20:15 18 15
8:30 35 37 20:30 19 15
8:45 38 144 29 131 275 20:45 16 73 10 51 124
9:00 38 27 21:00 11 14
9:15 30 33 21:15 8 12
9:30 31 29 21:30 11 15
9:45 24 123 43 132 255 21:45 13 43 8 49 92
10:00 25 21 22:00 7 3
10:15 27 40 22:15 6 7
10:30 36 36 22:30 9 5
10:45 32 120 42 139 259 22:45 10 32 10 25 57
11:00 28 39 23:00 5 3
11:15 34 30 23:15 11 7
11:30 39 31 23:30 7 5
11:45 43 144 26 126 270 23:45 11 34 7 22 56
Total Vol. 989 1138 2127 1807 1190 2997
EB WB Combined
2796 2328 5124
Split % 46.5% 53.5% 41.5% 60.3% 39.7% 58.5%
Peak Hour 11:15 6:15 7:45 16:30 13:45 14:15
Volume 148 166 288 297 191 462
P.H.F. 0.86 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.75 0.88
Daily Totals
AM PM
Thursday, February 24, 2022
ADT6 Center St between Riverside Ave - Main St and City Limits AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

11.a
Packet Pg. 607
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 4 2 12:00 47 75
0:15 3 3 12:15 64 51
0:30 3 2 12:30 56 70
0:45 1 11 2 9 20 12:45 48 215 66 262 477
1:00 2 4 13:00 46 89
1:15 2 7 13:15 54 80
1:30 2 2 13:30 37 85
1:45 1 7 2 15 22 13:45 58 195 73 327 522
2:00 1 2 14:00 45 80
2:15 1 3 14:15 74 98
2:30 0 3 14:30 64 89
2:45 0 2 3 11 13 14:45 59 242 99 366 608
3:00 2 3 15:00 87 123
3:15 2 1 15:15 131 123
3:30 2 3 15:30 141 139
3:45 4 10 4 11 21 15:45 151 510 138 523 1033
4:00 2 4 16:00 129 158
4:15 3 10 16:15 122 175
4:30 8 1 16:30 110 200
4:45 7 20 4 19 39 16:45 134 495 190 723 1218
5:00 4 9 17:00 94 175
5:15 6 12 17:15 98 174
5:30 13 9 17:30 103 207
5:45 16 39 13 43 82 17:45 109 404 157 713 1117
6:00 14 22 18:00 108 103
6:15 16 14 18:15 63 85
6:30 16 27 18:30 79 75
6:45 42 88 33 96 184 18:45 67 317 54 317 634
7:00 33 41 19:00 62 52
7:15 43 57 19:15 48 44
7:30 68 61 19:30 37 37
7:45 92 236 64 223 459 19:45 49 196 31 164 360
8:00 88 54 20:00 43 43
8:15 78 48 20:15 28 20
8:30 62 55 20:30 29 36
8:45 50 278 51 208 486 20:45 38 138 26 125 263
9:00 43 50 21:00 28 25
9:15 52 40 21:15 28 29
9:30 40 58 21:30 22 18
9:45 40 175 59 207 382 21:45 22 100 23 95 195
10:00 23 45 22:00 30 19
10:15 42 46 22:15 17 9
10:30 39 38 22:30 23 13
10:45 25 129 53 182 311 22:45 14 84 11 52 136
11:00 49 50 23:00 10 10
11:15 50 49 23:15 9 7
11:30 36 54 23:30 10 11
11:45 59 194 60 213 407 23:45 20 49 10 38 87
Total Vol. 1189 1237 2426 2945 3705 6650
NB SB Combined
4134 4942 9076
Split % 49.0% 51.0% 26.7% 44.3% 55.7% 73.3%
Peak Hour 7:30 11:45 7:30 15:15 16:45 16:00
Volume 326 256 553 552 746 1218
P.H.F. 0.89 0.85 0.89 0.91 0.90 0.94
Daily Totals
AM PM
Tuesday, February 15, 2022
ADT7 Cooley Dr betw een Cooley Ln and W ashington St AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

11.a
Packet Pg. 608
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 6 1 12:00 63 52
0:15 3 4 12:15 54 50
0:30 6 2 12:30 63 49
0:45 1 16 2 9 25 12:45 59 239 47 198 437
1:00 4 3 13:00 70 48
1:15 3 0 13:15 56 41
1:30 4 3 13:30 49 49
1:45 4 15 1 7 22 13:45 72 247 46 184 431
2:00 1 0 14:00 64 57
2:15 1 1 14:15 91 47
2:30 3 2 14:30 89 50
2:45 3 8 2 5 13 14:45 67 311 61 215 526
3:00 2 4 15:00 90 70
3:15 2 7 15:15 93 104
3:30 1 3 15:30 101 117
3:45 2 7 7 21 28 15:45 103 387 123 414 801
4:00 0 4 16:00 97 101
4:15 3 4 16:15 111 79
4:30 3 10 16:30 133 121
4:45 3 9 4 22 31 16:45 125 466 70 371 837
5:00 10 4 17:00 150 69
5:15 9 8 17:15 127 72
5:30 11 8 17:30 136 85
5:45 10 40 23 43 83 17:45 116 529 72 298 827
6:00 16 14 18:00 110 72
6:15 15 14 18:15 60 44
6:30 26 23 18:30 54 38
6:45 36 93 38 89 182 18:45 39 263 46 200 463
7:00 21 41 19:00 43 46
7:15 46 35 19:15 32 33
7:30 50 56 19:30 38 24
7:45 52 169 70 202 371 19:45 23 136 30 133 269
8:00 39 68 20:00 40 31
8:15 28 57 20:15 21 17
8:30 33 33 20:30 24 9
8:45 35 135 33 191 326 20:45 22 107 21 78 185
9:00 27 46 21:00 18 22
9:15 29 42 21:15 12 10
9:30 37 35 21:30 14 16
9:45 45 138 37 160 298 21:45 18 62 15 63 125
10:00 41 33 22:00 16 15
10:15 41 44 22:15 6 10
10:30 44 40 22:30 11 13
10:45 35 161 39 156 317 22:45 12 45 15 53 98
11:00 43 41 23:00 11 7
11:15 43 53 23:15 7 7
11:30 47 44 23:30 8 14
11:45 54 187 57 195 382 23:45 7 33 25 53 86
Total Vol. 978 1100 2078 2825 2260 5085
EB WB Combined
3803 3360 7163
Split % 47.1% 52.9% 29.0% 55.6% 44.4% 71.0%
Peak Hour 11:45 7:30 11:45 16:45 15:15 15:45
Volume 234 251 442 538 445 868
P.H.F. 0.93 0.90 0.96 0.90 0.90 0.85
Daily Totals
AM PM
Tuesday, February 15, 2022
ADT8 Cooley Dr betw een Mt Vernon and Cooley Ln AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

11.a
Packet Pg. 609
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 3 1 12:00 12 15
0:15 1 4 12:15 15 15
0:30 3 0 12:30 17 21
0:45 4 11 0 5 16 12:45 17 61 14 65 126
1:00 3 3 13:00 24 16
1:15 1 2 13:15 23 15
1:30 2 0 13:30 28 17
1:45 3 9 3 8 17 13:45 39 114 38 86 200
2:00 1 2 14:00 27 35
2:15 1 1 14:15 47 32
2:30 1 1 14:30 31 27
2:45 2 5 0 4 9 14:45 32 137 21 115 252
3:00 0 3 15:00 39 21
3:15 1 2 15:15 28 24
3:30 5 1 15:30 42 47
3:45 1 7 0 6 13 15:45 33 142 37 129 271
4:00 4 3 16:00 34 23
4:15 4 4 16:15 44 21
4:30 7 6 16:30 44 23
4:45 3 18 7 20 38 16:45 50 172 28 95 267
5:00 3 5 17:00 40 14
5:15 7 4 17:15 37 30
5:30 11 6 17:30 34 14
5:45 8 29 5 20 49 17:45 32 143 20 78 221
6:00 7 8 18:00 30 20
6:15 9 8 18:15 38 18
6:30 18 8 18:30 25 12
6:45 16 50 6 30 80 18:45 15 108 13 63 171
7:00 13 8 19:00 18 19
7:15 26 10 19:15 19 10
7:30 60 33 19:30 22 4
7:45 78 177 54 105 282 19:45 17 76 8 41 117
8:00 98 40 20:00 17 15
8:15 66 56 20:15 19 13
8:30 36 32 20:30 11 15
8:45 18 218 25 153 371 20:45 12 59 8 51 110
9:00 11 13 21:00 12 7
9:15 19 15 21:15 13 1
9:30 22 9 21:30 16 7
9:45 17 69 14 51 120 21:45 6 47 4 19 66
10:00 15 16 22:00 10 0
10:15 22 11 22:15 5 6
10:30 25 14 22:30 5 4
10:45 11 73 19 60 133 22:45 8 28 3 13 41
11:00 15 17 23:00 3 0
11:15 34 10 23:15 2 4
11:30 16 23 23:30 7 3
11:45 21 86 18 68 154 23:45 3 15 0 7 22
Total Vol. 752 530 1282 1102 762 1864
NB SB Combined
1854 1292 3146
Split % 58.7% 41.3% 40.8% 59.1% 40.9% 59.2%
Peak Hour 7:30 7:30 7:30 16:15 13:45 15:30
Volume 302 183 485 178 132 281
P.H.F. 0.77 0.82 0.88 0.89 0.87 0.79
Daily Totals
AM PM
Tuesday, February 15, 2022
ADT9 Eucaly ptus Ave betw een Randall Ave and San Bernardino Ave AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

11.a
Packet Pg. 610
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 4 11 12:00 53 65
0:15 3 9 12:15 67 71
0:30 4 8 12:30 55 77
0:45 5 16 8 36 52 12:45 82 257 66 279 536
1:00 1 4 13:00 73 68
1:15 3 2 13:15 68 70
1:30 1 5 13:30 62 68
1:45 3 8 6 17 25 13:45 73 276 80 286 562
2:00 4 3 14:00 63 80
2:15 3 2 14:15 67 108
2:30 5 4 14:30 81 97
2:45 6 18 0 9 27 14:45 101 312 101 386 698
3:00 6 2 15:00 78 88
3:15 8 5 15:15 91 72
3:30 3 1 15:30 96 125
3:45 6 23 4 12 35 15:45 99 364 91 376 740
4:00 5 6 16:00 88 101
4:15 6 4 16:15 94 111
4:30 10 6 16:30 105 120
4:45 14 35 3 19 54 16:45 135 422 110 442 864
5:00 12 6 17:00 115 157
5:15 17 9 17:15 96 165
5:30 36 8 17:30 94 127
5:45 36 101 7 30 131 17:45 92 397 97 546 943
6:00 22 10 18:00 88 80
6:15 33 8 18:15 62 66
6:30 50 19 18:30 52 47
6:45 49 154 23 60 214 18:45 39 241 47 240 481
7:00 52 18 19:00 39 58
7:15 56 30 19:15 32 48
7:30 76 45 19:30 26 40
7:45 110 294 49 142 436 19:45 28 125 36 182 307
8:00 57 42 20:00 18 23
8:15 48 44 20:15 19 29
8:30 52 48 20:30 26 26
8:45 51 208 45 179 387 20:45 18 81 17 95 176
9:00 51 69 21:00 8 27
9:15 51 39 21:15 18 16
9:30 68 55 21:30 11 16
9:45 60 230 53 216 446 21:45 8 45 16 75 120
10:00 51 51 22:00 13 20
10:15 55 59 22:15 14 21
10:30 37 67 22:30 5 20
10:45 56 199 51 228 427 22:45 6 38 15 76 114
11:00 53 68 23:00 8 16
11:15 50 59 23:15 9 10
11:30 56 49 23:30 8 21
11:45 56 215 52 228 443 23:45 4 29 13 60 89
Total Vol. 1501 1176 2677 2587 3043 5630
EB WB Combined
4088 4219 8307
Split % 56.1% 43.9% 32.2% 46.0% 54.0% 67.8%
Peak Hour 7:15 11:45 11:45 16:30 16:45 16:30
Volume 299 265 496 451 559 1003
P.H.F. 0.68 0.86 0.90 0.84 0.85 0.92
Daily Totals
AM PM
Tuesday, February 22, 2022
ADT10 Fairway Dr between Mt Vernon Ave and Auto Plaza Dr AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

11.a
Packet Pg. 611
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 5 7 12:00 57 75
0:15 6 5 12:15 49 76
0:30 0 16 12:30 56 74
0:45 4 15 8 36 51 12:45 57 219 94 319 538
1:00 3 5 13:00 61 73
1:15 2 8 13:15 52 86
1:30 2 7 13:30 57 96
1:45 1 8 8 28 36 13:45 64 234 90 345 579
2:00 1 4 14:00 57 107
2:15 1 3 14:15 75 103
2:30 4 10 14:30 65 145
2:45 4 10 2 19 29 14:45 63 260 125 480 740
3:00 6 3 15:00 80 142
3:15 4 4 15:15 81 137
3:30 8 3 15:30 81 140
3:45 9 27 3 13 40 15:45 79 321 194 613 934
4:00 9 8 16:00 71 173
4:15 18 7 16:15 56 157
4:30 9 9 16:30 83 193
4:45 22 58 8 32 90 16:45 90 300 137 660 960
5:00 15 10 17:00 67 158
5:15 24 12 17:15 78 187
5:30 29 8 17:30 69 153
5:45 43 111 13 43 154 17:45 59 273 149 647 920
6:00 33 23 18:00 36 128
6:15 47 27 18:15 44 132
6:30 70 37 18:30 44 92
6:45 90 240 42 129 369 18:45 34 158 76 428 586
7:00 99 53 19:00 34 91
7:15 102 55 19:15 29 58
7:30 124 59 19:30 27 70
7:45 136 461 73 240 701 19:45 27 117 41 260 377
8:00 119 80 20:00 29 43
8:15 91 64 20:15 14 42
8:30 73 66 20:30 18 52
8:45 100 383 61 271 654 20:45 16 77 36 173 250
9:00 57 63 21:00 9 30
9:15 61 46 21:15 15 24
9:30 56 53 21:30 14 38
9:45 69 243 64 226 469 21:45 17 55 25 117 172
10:00 44 63 22:00 14 23
10:15 51 53 22:15 10 19
10:30 45 64 22:30 11 11
10:45 45 185 64 244 429 22:45 8 43 25 78 121
11:00 51 58 23:00 8 16
11:15 53 61 23:15 5 10
11:30 55 61 23:30 8 10
11:45 47 206 78 258 464 23:45 6 27 19 55 82
Total Vol. 1947 1539 3486 2084 4175 6259
NB SB Combined
4031 5714 9745
Split % 55.9% 44.1% 35.8% 33.3% 66.7% 64.2%
Peak Hour 7:15 11:45 7:15 15:00 15:45 15:45
Volume 481 303 748 321 717 1006
P.H.F. 0.88 0.97 0.89 0.99 0.92 0.91
Daily Totals
AM PM
Tuesday, February 15, 2022
ADT11 Hunts Ln betw een Redlands Blvd and W ashington St AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

11.a
Packet Pg. 612
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 2 0 12:00 32 26
0:15 5 5 12:15 36 31
0:30 1 4 12:30 25 27
0:45 2 10 1 10 20 12:45 34 127 30 114 241
1:00 2 0 13:00 37 35
1:15 2 0 13:15 29 27
1:30 0 2 13:30 32 42
1:45 0 4 1 3 7 13:45 34 132 44 148 280
2:00 0 1 14:00 33 25
2:15 0 2 14:15 30 42
2:30 2 1 14:30 64 51
2:45 0 2 2 6 8 14:45 48 175 37 155 330
3:00 2 3 15:00 45 47
3:15 2 1 15:15 42 38
3:30 0 2 15:30 43 41
3:45 1 5 6 12 17 15:45 34 164 45 171 335
4:00 3 2 16:00 33 43
4:15 5 6 16:15 39 48
4:30 1 7 16:30 44 40
4:45 5 14 11 26 40 16:45 51 167 22 153 320
5:00 3 13 17:00 47 44
5:15 4 17 17:15 55 38
5:30 4 14 17:30 43 48
5:45 6 17 19 63 80 17:45 40 185 39 169 354
6:00 3 15 18:00 26 26
6:15 8 20 18:15 25 21
6:30 10 16 18:30 22 23
6:45 11 32 22 73 105 18:45 30 103 22 92 195
7:00 14 44 19:00 14 22
7:15 30 31 19:15 16 15
7:30 28 28 19:30 19 20
7:45 24 96 40 143 239 19:45 22 71 16 73 144
8:00 29 43 20:00 13 14
8:15 23 30 20:15 11 14
8:30 17 26 20:30 16 20
8:45 24 93 34 133 226 20:45 6 46 6 54 100
9:00 23 27 21:00 9 14
9:15 28 30 21:15 7 10
9:30 31 32 21:30 8 11
9:45 29 111 20 109 220 21:45 5 29 9 44 73
10:00 27 42 22:00 6 5
10:15 27 27 22:15 6 5
10:30 37 33 22:30 4 6
10:45 46 137 32 134 271 22:45 6 22 2 18 40
11:00 28 26 23:00 7 3
11:15 40 40 23:15 3 3
11:30 45 37 23:30 3 3
11:45 36 149 40 143 292 23:45 2 15 5 14 29
Total Vol. 670 855 1525 1236 1205 2441
NB SB Combined
1906 2060 3966
Split % 43.9% 56.1% 38.5% 50.6% 49.4% 61.5%
Peak Hour 10:45 7:00 11:15 14:30 14:15 14:30
Volume 159 143 296 199 177 372
P.H.F. 0.86 0.81 0.90 0.78 0.87 0.81
Tuesday, February 22, 2022
ADT12 La Cadena Dr between Mt Vernon Ave and 8th St AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected] Daily Totals
AM PM

11.a
Packet Pg. 613
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 1 1 12:00 21 29
0:15 1 3 12:15 28 23
0:30 1 2 12:30 19 28
0:45 1 4 1 7 11 12:45 24 92 31 111 203
1:00 1 0 13:00 29 34
1:15 2 1 13:15 23 20
1:30 1 2 13:30 22 39
1:45 0 4 1 4 8 13:45 21 95 36 129 224
2:00 0 2 14:00 21 21
2:15 0 0 14:15 25 38
2:30 1 1 14:30 39 50
2:45 0 1 2 5 6 14:45 35 120 31 140 260
3:00 1 3 15:00 34 34
3:15 2 1 15:15 34 32
3:30 0 3 15:30 37 36
3:45 2 5 5 12 17 15:45 27 132 37 139 271
4:00 2 3 16:00 30 44
4:15 1 5 16:15 38 36
4:30 0 8 16:30 30 34
4:45 3 6 10 26 32 16:45 38 136 16 130 266
5:00 1 11 17:00 38 39
5:15 4 15 17:15 50 44
5:30 4 17 17:30 32 41
5:45 5 14 14 57 71 17:45 34 154 36 160 314
6:00 3 17 18:00 18 24
6:15 4 19 18:15 23 16
6:30 7 12 18:30 13 16
6:45 8 22 29 77 99 18:45 23 77 18 74 151
7:00 14 45 19:00 10 22
7:15 28 30 19:15 17 15
7:30 21 23 19:30 9 14
7:45 15 78 34 132 210 19:45 15 51 16 67 118
8:00 19 30 20:00 7 12
8:15 21 29 20:15 5 12
8:30 18 26 20:30 14 17
8:45 16 74 29 114 188 20:45 5 31 9 50 81
9:00 16 20 21:00 8 9
9:15 23 23 21:15 5 10
9:30 19 31 21:30 5 10
9:45 30 88 14 88 176 21:45 6 24 5 34 58
10:00 21 27 22:00 4 2
10:15 27 20 22:15 4 4
10:30 31 27 22:30 3 4
10:45 38 117 24 98 215 22:45 6 17 1 11 28
11:00 23 23 23:00 5 3
11:15 40 32 23:15 2 2
11:30 31 31 23:30 3 2
11:45 26 120 37 123 243 23:45 2 12 5 12 24
Total Vol. 533 743 1276 941 1057 1998
NB SB Combined
1474 1800 3274
Split % 41.8% 58.2% 39.0% 47.1% 52.9% 61.0%
Peak Hour 10:30 7:00 11:15 16:45 17:00 17:00
Volume 132 132 247 158 160 314
P.H.F. 0.83 0.73 0.86 0.79 0.91 0.84
Daily Totals
AM PM
Tuesday, February 22, 2022
ADT13 La Cadena Dr between 8th St and Valley Blvd AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

11.a
Packet Pg. 614
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 12 4 12:00 106 108
0:15 10 7 12:15 112 112
0:30 13 6 12:30 147 112
0:45 4 39 6 23 62 12:45 126 491 113 445 936
1:00 7 5 13:00 115 112
1:15 6 8 13:15 106 99
1:30 15 5 13:30 134 110
1:45 5 33 8 26 59 13:45 123 478 103 424 902
2:00 6 10 14:00 136 107
2:15 12 6 14:15 134 124
2:30 13 5 14:30 142 157
2:45 9 40 6 27 67 14:45 140 552 137 525 1077
3:00 8 8 15:00 160 117
3:15 9 9 15:15 155 128
3:30 13 12 15:30 174 150
3:45 8 38 19 48 86 15:45 165 654 155 550 1204
4:00 23 15 16:00 192 151
4:15 36 16 16:15 156 173
4:30 93 38 16:30 202 164
4:45 98 250 43 112 362 16:45 153 703 193 681 1384
5:00 97 30 17:00 182 200
5:15 123 38 17:15 145 190
5:30 178 68 17:30 128 172
5:45 205 603 93 229 832 17:45 134 589 161 723 1312
6:00 236 42 18:00 146 160
6:15 229 59 18:15 112 100
6:30 236 124 18:30 89 74
6:45 210 911 175 400 1311 18:45 64 411 72 406 817
7:00 207 175 19:00 70 52
7:15 237 162 19:15 55 62
7:30 263 164 19:30 49 60
7:45 273 980 216 717 1697 19:45 53 227 48 222 449
8:00 205 137 20:00 56 39
8:15 146 106 20:15 46 49
8:30 134 91 20:30 38 31
8:45 112 597 75 409 1006 20:45 39 179 37 156 335
9:00 104 57 21:00 36 30
9:15 88 54 21:15 26 25
9:30 104 96 21:30 33 24
9:45 91 387 80 287 674 21:45 23 118 26 105 223
10:00 95 74 22:00 29 26
10:15 87 74 22:15 15 12
10:30 72 74 22:30 19 16
10:45 106 360 81 303 663 22:45 17 80 17 71 151
11:00 99 81 23:00 19 13
11:15 97 77 23:15 14 17
11:30 94 93 23:30 10 11
11:45 119 409 102 353 762 23:45 14 57 14 55 112
Total Vol. 4647 2934 7581 4539 4363 8902
NB SB Combined
9186 7297 16483
Split % 61.3% 38.7% 46.0% 51.0% 49.0% 54.0%
Peak Hour 7:00 7:00 7:00 15:45 16:45 16:30
Volume 980 717 1697 715 755 1429
P.H.F. 0.90 0.83 0.87 0.88 0.94 0.94
Daily Totals
AM PM
Wednesday, February 23, 2022
ADT14 La Cadena Dr between Valley and BNSF Railroad Overpass AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

11.a
Packet Pg. 615
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 9 7 12:00 105 136
0:15 13 12 12:15 109 137
0:30 18 9 12:30 96 166
0:45 10 50 8 36 86 12:45 117 427 158 597 1024
1:00 8 13 13:00 101 140
1:15 12 8 13:15 93 143
1:30 14 6 13:30 127 135
1:45 6 40 10 37 77 13:45 120 441 151 569 1010
2:00 7 8 14:00 136 168
2:15 7 6 14:15 121 218
2:30 5 18 14:30 166 230
2:45 8 27 11 43 70 14:45 195 618 212 828 1446
3:00 11 20 15:00 184 209
3:15 12 17 15:15 136 220
3:30 10 26 15:30 195 256
3:45 11 44 31 94 138 15:45 188 703 253 938 1641
4:00 23 30 16:00 195 273
4:15 46 38 16:15 188 312
4:30 112 68 16:30 183 340
4:45 122 303 75 211 514 16:45 153 719 294 1219 1938
5:00 132 80 17:00 181 304
5:15 151 94 17:15 179 319
5:30 255 101 17:30 165 278
5:45 290 828 117 392 1220 17:45 164 689 283 1184 1873
6:00 299 99 18:00 125 267
6:15 320 139 18:15 109 166
6:30 335 205 18:30 114 126
6:45 355 1309 255 698 2007 18:45 76 424 107 666 1090
7:00 324 292 19:00 86 72
7:15 322 280 19:15 56 87
7:30 333 275 19:30 56 82
7:45 300 1279 299 1146 2425 19:45 58 256 63 304 560
8:00 229 272 20:00 48 39
8:15 173 217 20:15 49 60
8:30 158 128 20:30 50 48
8:45 141 701 120 737 1438 20:45 46 193 43 190 383
9:00 103 89 21:00 34 49
9:15 83 93 21:15 38 37
9:30 83 119 21:30 37 52
9:45 96 365 99 400 765 21:45 27 136 27 165 301
10:00 83 90 22:00 25 28
10:15 92 111 22:15 24 28
10:30 61 97 22:30 23 26
10:45 85 321 105 403 724 22:45 33 105 26 108 213
11:00 94 105 23:00 20 20
11:15 94 83 23:15 24 22
11:30 97 129 23:30 22 19
11:45 100 385 125 442 827 23:45 17 83 16 77 160
Total Vol. 5652 4639 10291 4794 6845 11639
NB SB Combined
10446 11484 21930
Split % 54.9% 45.1% 46.9% 41.2% 58.8% 53.1%
Peak Hour 6:30 7:00 6:45 15:30 16:30 16:15
Volume 1336 1146 2436 766 1257 1955
P.H.F. 0.94 0.96 0.99 0.98 0.92 0.93
Daily Totals
AM PM
Wednesday, February 23, 2022
ADT15 La Cadena Dr between BNSF Railroad Overpass and City Limits AimTD 714 253 7888 [email protected]

11.a
Packet Pg. 616
Attachment: EXHIBIT A - Colton 2022 Final ETS-optimized (3973 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-02-23) CITY: Colton PROJECT:

AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 0 1 12:00 20 34
0:15 4 1 12:15 28 21
0:30 1 2 12:30 30 24
0:45 3 8 2 6 14 12:45 23 101 20 99 200
1:00 4 2 13:00 21 27
1:15 0 4 13:15 20 18
1:30 0 1 13:30 18 21
1:45 0 4 0 7 11 13:45 16 75 20 86 161
2:00 4 1 14:00 19 18
2:15 1 0 14:15 15 20
2:30 2 4 14:30 38 50
2:45 3 10 1 6 16 14:45 27 99 42 130 229
3:00 0 1 15:00 49 25
3:15 1 4 15:15 38 30
3:30 2 2 15:30 30 38
3:45 3 6 2 9 15 15:45 25 142 28 121 263
4:00 1 1 16:00 33 38
4:15 5 6 16:15 37 26
4:30 8 3 16:30 35 32
4:45 11 25 7 17 42 16:45 32 137 23 119 256
5:00 3 6 17:00 22 27
5:15 2 12 17:15 23 24
5:30 6 7 17:30 31 28
5:45 7 18 7 32 50 17:45 20 96 39 118 214
6:00 3 6 18:00 18 25
6:15 7 10 18:15 27 22
6:30 11 9 18:30 22 17
6:45 15 36 11 36 72 18:45 14 81 26 90 171
7:00 22 28 19:00 18 22
7:15 60 43 19:15 14 14
7:30 101 84 19:30 11 12
7:45 145 328 96 251 579 19:45 13 56 13 61 117
8:00 57 46 20:00 11 20
8:15 26 22 20:15 10 15
8:30 16 17 20:30 26 11
8:45 11 110 8 93 203 20:45 12 59 7 53 112
9:00 7 13 21:00 11 11
9:15 13 9 21:15 6 12
9:30 16 10 21:30 6 7
9:45 12 48 18 50 98 21:45 3 26 5 35 61
10:00 13 12 22:00 4 6
10:15 18 12 22:15 3 4
10:30 15 16 22:30 5 7
10:45 8 54 15 55 109 22:45 6 18 3 20 38
11:00 18 16 23:00 2 2
11:15 13 16 23:15 4 1
11:30 14 16 23:30 5 7
11:45 19 64 25 73 137 23:45 6 17 1 11 28
Total Vol. 711 635 1346 907 943 1850
EB WB Combined
1618 1578 3196
Split % 52.8% 47.2% 42.1% 49.0% 51.0% 57.9%
Peak Hour 7:15 7:15 7:15 14:30 14:30 14:30
Volume 363 269 632 152 147 299
P.H.F. 0.63 0.70 0.66 0.83 0.74 0.85
Wednesday, March 02, 2022
ADT16 Laurel St between Grand Ave and Pennsylvania Ave Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 Daily Totals
AM PM