Colton City Council
October 1, 2024

1 CITY OF COLTON
City Hall, Council Chambers
650 N. La Cadena Drive
Colton, CA 92324
Website: www.coltonca.gov

Mayor Frank J. Navarro
Council Members:

David J. Toro – District 1
Kelly J. Chastain – District 2
Dr. Luis S. Gonzalez – District 3
John R. Echevarria – District 4

City Treasurer Aurelio De La Torre

City Manager William R. Smith
City Attorney Carlos Campos
Chief Deputy City Clerk Stephanie M. Vargas

AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL,

COLTON UTILITY AUTHORITY, COLTON PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY,

COLTON HOUSING AUTHORITY

REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2024 – 5:00 P.M.

CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 p.m.

CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER

ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENT - Closed Session
This is the portion of the meeting specifically set aside to invite your comments regarding Closed Session items and other general comments about matters not on the agenda; however, any matter that requires action will be referred to staff for investigation and report at a subsequent Council meeting. The Council is prohibited by law from discussing or taking immediate action on items during this public comment period.

Persons desiring to submit paperwork to the City Council Members shall provide a copy of any paperwork to the City Clerk for the Official Record.

Speakers will be limited to 3 minutes; provided, however, that the presiding officer shall have certain discretion to extend or limit time as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure.

Please state your name and your City of Residence before providing your comment.

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Yasmin Mendoza v. City of Colton, et al.

San Bernardino County Superior Court, Case No. CIVSB 2218811

2 B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title - City Manager

CITY ATTORNEY ORAL REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS

RULES OF DECORUM

To help conduct the business of the City Council in an orderly fashion, the City Council has adopted rules pertaining to decorum and order, as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure. The City Council will strictly enforce these rules in order to allow full expression of ideas and opinions by councilmembers, staff and the public. Generally, the City's rules of decorum prohibit comments or actions which willfully disrupt the meeting. All remarks and questions shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any particular member. No individual Councilmember or member of the City staff shall be questioned without first obtaining permission from the Presiding Officer. The City Council asks that all persons - including councilmembers, staff and the public - act and speak respectfully.

OPEN SESSION
6:00 P.M.

OPEN SESSION CALLED TO ORDER
INVOCATION Pastor Don Duenez - Echoes of Love Ministry FLAG SALUTE Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Vietnam Veteran Tom Leon

ROLL CALL

CEREMONIAL MATTERS
Presentations, Awards, Proclamations
 Recognition - Life Saving Actions
 Proclamation - Public Power Week 2024
 Proclamation - Water Professionals Appreciation Week

MAYOR AND COUNCIL ITEMS

GIFT DISCLOSURES
Prior to rendering a decision in any proceeding involving a license, permit, contract or other entitlement pending before the City Council, any Council Member who has received been pro mised a gift or gifts aggregating $50.00 or more in value within the preceding twelve months from a party or participant in the proceeding shall disclose that fact either orally or in writing during open session. This disclosure shall be made part of the official public record of the proceeding, either as part of the minutes of the meeting or as a separate writing filed with the city. (CMC Section 2.04.030)

3 AB 1234 ORAL REPORTS
Members of the City Council shall provide brief reports on meetings attended at the expense of the city. (GC Section 53232.3(d))

APPOINTMENTS

MAYOR AND COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEMS

PUBLIC HEARINGS

To speak on public hearing items, it is requested that you obtain a card from the City Clerk and complete it by noting the agenda item number, as well as whether you are in favor, opposition or neither, and give it to the City Clerk. The applicant will be allowed 5 minutes to address the Council and all other persons will be allowed 3 minutes; provided, however, that the presiding officer shall have certain discretion to extend or limit time as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure.

(1) Continued Public Hearing: Reche Canyon Commercial DAP-001-453 - TIME AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER THE CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FROM SEPTEMBER 17, 2024, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE # 2019039115) FOR THE RECHE CANYON PROJECT; ADOPTING

FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; FOR A REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE RECHE CANYON

SPECIFIC PLAN TO CHANGE THE ONSITE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM ESTATE DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL) TO COMMERCIAL, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A 24-HOUR, GASOLINE SERVICE STATION, DRIVE-

THROUGH CAR WASH, AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AND AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE PLAN REVIEW TO

APPROVE THE SITE PLAN, SITE IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING PLANS, AND ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS

FOR THE PROPOSED RETAIL SALES (INDOORS), CONVENIENCE STORE, AND GASOLINE SERVICE STATION WITH DRIVE-THROUGH CAR WASH ON PROPERTY MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 2.90 ACRES LOCATED AT 2501 RECHE CANYON ROAD; AND FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE EXISTING LAND USE FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED-USE DOWNTOWN AND CHANGE OF ZONE FROM C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO M-U-D (MIXED-USE DOWNTOWN) AT 645 S. 7TH STREET (FILE INDEX NUMBER DAP -001- 453).
[Staff Person: Heidi Duron]
(Public Hearing Continued from September 17, 2024)

Mayor announces the Public Hearing Open.

City Clerk submits the Affidavit of Publication and reports on protests or objections thereto.

Staff Presentation.

Public Comment.

After hearing public comment, on motion by Councilmember __________, seconded by Councilmember _________, the Public Hearing is terminated.

MOTION __________ SECOND __________

4 BUSINESS ITEMS
There are no Business Items.

PUBLIC COMMENT Limit 3 Minutes
This is the portion of the meeting specifically set aside to invite your comments regarding Consent Calendar items and other general comments about matters not on the agenda; however, any matter that requires action will be referred to staff for investigation and report at a subsequent Council meeting. The Council is prohibited by law from discussing or taking immediate action on items during this public comment period.

Persons desiring to submit paperwork to the City Council Members shall provide a copy of any paperwork to the City Clerk for the Official Record.

Speakers will be limited to 3 minutes; provided, however, that the presiding officer shall have certain discretion to extend or limit time as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure.

Please state your name and your City of Residence before providing your comment.

CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will all be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time the City Council votes on the motion, unless councilmembers, staff or the public request that specific items be discussed and/or removed for separate discussions or action.

(2) Minutes - Approval of Minutes for the City Council Regular Meeting held on September 17, 2024. [Staff Person: Stephanie M. Vargas]
(3) Warrants - Approve US Bank voucher dated 08/20/24 and totaling $67,523.96; voucher numbers 214264 to 214417 dated 08/15/2024 and totaling $810,591.57; vouchers numbers 214418 to 214486 dated 08/19/2024 and totaling $962,619.19; vouchers numbers 214487 to 214539 dated 08/21/2024 and totaling $936,797.85; vouchers numbers 214540 to 214620 dated 08/28/2024 and totaling $91,954.34; vouchers numbers 214621 to 214694 dated 08/29/2024 and totaling $1,206,564.56; vouchers numbers 214695 to 214787 dated 09/03/2024 and totaling $301,168.40; and payroll disbursement listing dated 08/03/2024 to 08/16/2024 and totaling $1,243,659.22.
[Staff Person: Stacey Dabbs]
(4) Contract Award - West Coast Arborist - Approve Contract Award to West Coast Arborist for Tree Trimming Maintenance Services.
[Staff Person: Brian Dickinson]
(5) Notice of Completion - Police Department Restroom Project - Approve Recordation of Notice of Completion for Police Department Restroom Renovations.
[Staff Person: Anthony Vega]
(6) Ongoing Emergency - AMPP - Affirm Ongoing Emergency at Agua Mansa Power Plant. [Staff Person: Charles Berry]

5 (7) Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-13-24 - Approve Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Colton Authorizing the Levy of Special Taxes in a Community Facilities District, Including Certain Annexation Territory Identified as Annexation No. 2, Into City of Colton Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Public Safety), ORDINANCE NO. O-13-24. [Staff Person: Stephanie M. Vargas]
(8) Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-14-24 - Approve Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Colton Authorizing the Levy of Special Taxes in a Community Facilities District, Including Certain Annexation Territory Identified as Annexation No. 2, into City of Colton Community Facilities District No. 2021-2 (Maintenance Services), ORDINANCE NO. O-14-24. [Staff Person: Stephanie M. Vargas]
(9) Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-10-24 - Approve Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Colton to Amend Section In Chapters 18.04 and 18.06 Of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Colton Municipal Code Related to Definitions and Permitted Uses as Related to Automobile Impound Yards and Automobile Storage (File Index No. Dap24-0005), ORDINANCE NO. O-10-24. [Staff Person: Stephanie M. Vargas]

MAYOR AND COUNCIL ORAL REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Comments from Mayor and Council on various issues and activities throughout the community. Comments shall be limited to 5 Minutes per speaker.

CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS

ADJOURNMENT

6 I, Stephanie Vargas, the Deputy City Clerk, hereby certify that a true and correct, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted , at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954(a), at the following locations:

City of Colton City Hall 650 N. La Cadena Drive
City of Colton Website, www.coltonca.gov <http://www.coltonca.gov>

PROCEDURES FOR ADDRESSING CITY COUNCIL

For the Official Record, it is requested that you obtain a card from the Deputy City Clerk and complete it by noting a specific item number on the Agenda, if applicable, or you can identify the subject that you wish to address under the Public Comment portion of the Agenda. The City Council encourages public input on all City issues within the Rules of Decorum. Speakers will be limited to the tim e periods provided on the Agenda; provided, however, that the presiding officer shall have certain discretion to extend or limit time as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure.

RULES OF DECORUM

To help conduct the business of the City Counc il in an orderly fashion, the City Council has adopted rules pertaining to decorum and order, as provided for in the City Council Manual of Procedure. The City Council will strictly enforce these rules in order to allow full expression of ideas and opinio ns by councilmembers, staff and the public. Generally, the City's rules of decorum prohibit comments or actions which willfully disrupt the meeting. All remarks and questions shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any particular member. No individual Councilmember or member of the City staff shall be questioned without first obtaining permission from the Presiding Officer. The City Council asks that all persons - including councilmembers, staff and the public - act and speak respectfully.

NOTICE TO PUBLIC

Staff reports or other written documentation relating to each item referred to, on the Agenda, are available for public inspection at the following locations: Office of the City Clerk, 650 N. La Cadena Drive, Colton, CA; City of Colt on Public Library, 656 9 th St., Colton, CA; or the City of Colton Internet Website, www.coltonca.gov. Any person having questions concerning any item on the Agenda may call the City Clerk at 370 -5191 to make inquiry concerning the nature of the item described on the Agenda. The City Clerk shall direct inquiries to the appropriate office.

All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will all be enacted by one moti on. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time the City Council votes on the motion, unless councilmembers, staff or the public request that specific items be discussed and/or removed for separate discussions or action.

7 In compl iance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City Meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 909 -370-5001. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arra ngements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

LEGAL CHALLENGES

If you challenge in court any discussion or action taken concerning an item on this Agenda, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised during the meeting or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the City's consideration of the item at the meeting.

MANUAL OF PROCEDURE

The City Council adopted its Manual of Procedure pursuant to Resolution No. R-41-18. Copies are available in the Office of the City Clerk.

ITEM NO. 1

STAFF REPORT

DATE: OCTOBER 1, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: HEIDI DURON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TIME AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER THE CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FROM SEPTEMBER 17, 2024, CERTIFYING

THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE
CLEARINGHOUSE # 2019039115) FOR THE RECHE CANYON
PROJECT; ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND ADOPTING
A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; FOR

A REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE RECHE CANYON

SPECIFIC PLAN TO CHANGE THE ONSITE LAND USE

DESIGNATION FROM ESTATE DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL) TO
COMMERCIAL, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A 24-

HOUR, GASOLINE SERVICE STATION, DRIVE-THROUGH CAR

WASH, AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AND AN ARCHITECTURAL

AND SITE PLAN REVIEW TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN, SITE

IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING PLANS, AND

ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED RETAIL

SALES (INDOORS), CONVENIENCE STORE, AND GASOLINE

SERVICE STATION WITH DRIVE-THROUGH CAR WASH ON
PROPERTY MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 2.90 ACRES
LOCATED AT 2501 RECHE CANYON ROAD; AND FOR A

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE EXISTING LAND

USE FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED-USE
DOWNTOWN AND CHANGE OF ZONE FROM C-2 (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) TO M-U-D (MIXED-USE DOWNTOWN) AT 645 S.
7TH STREET (FILE INDEX NUMBER DAP-001-453).

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

1.1 Packet Pg. 8
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453
October 1, 2024

Adopt Resolution No. R-92-24 a Resolution of the of City Council of the City of Colton Denying an Ordinance for Reche Canyon Specific Plan Amendment to Change the Land Use Designation From Estate Density (Residential) To Commercial. (FILE INDEX NUMBER DAP-01-453).

BACKGROUND

The project site is located in the southeast corner of the City, on the west side of Reche Canyon Road just south of Crystal Ridge Lane. The approximate 2.90 -acre site includes four parcels, (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APNs] 0284 -211-70, 71, 72, and 1178 -371-27.). The triangular shaped site was created because of the realignment of Reche Canyon Road.

In 1990-1991 when the Reche Canyon Specific Plan (RCSP) was approved, the subject property was considered as part of the adoption of the RCSP. On February 5, 1991, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. O -18-90 approving the Specific Plan, excluding the additional 2.9 -acre commercial proposal of the RCSP. The primary reason for the change was traffic and Attachments 1 and 2 provide background on former request to designate the subject property to “Commercial” during consideration of the original RCSP. The subject site was denied in 1991 for a change from residential to commercial land use because of traffic and land use compatibility.

On September 7, 2017, the application was submitted to the City Development S ervices Department for a commercial project within the RCSP. The RCSP allows for the City to consider such expansion pursuant to Section 4.3 (Permitted Land Use Categories of the RCSP):
“This land use classification will permit continued operation of the small commercial cluster along Reche Canyon Road near the mobile home park , and possible expansion of commercial uses across Reche Canyon Road along the proposed new alignment . The land between the present Reche Canyon Road and the proposed new alignment east of the hill at the mouth of the canyon could be redesigned from Estate Density to Commercial to help finance the realignment of Reche Canyon Road. Commercial uses will be limited to neighborhood serving businesses such as small restaurants, gas, food and sundries, and other services typically serving a neighborhood rather than a whole community.” (RCSP, page 37) The project site location is below – 2501 Reche Canyon Drive:

1.1 Packet Pg. 9
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453
October 1, 2024

The application to develop the commercial project includes five major zoning entitlements to allow the commercial project:
 Specific Plan Amendment to the Reche Canyon Specific Plan (originally adopted in 1991) to change an existing Residential Estate Density Zone to Commercial Zone.  General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone was also included to address recent state law (Senate Bill 330) requiring “Zero Net Loss” of residential density. When residential density is removed it must be replaced in another part of the City. Therefore, a General Plan Amendment and Rezone to property at 645 S. 7 th Street is also proposed to change the existing C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning to M-U/D (Mixed-Use Downtown).  Conditional Use Permit to allow a 24 -hour, gasoline service station, drive -through car wash, and convenience store as required by the RCSP.
 Architectural and Site Plan Review to approve the site plan, site improvements, landscaping plans, and architectural elevations for the proposed retail sales (indoors), convenience store, and gasoline service station with drive -through car wash on p roperty measuring approximately 2.90 acres located at 2501 Reche Canyon Road.

Because the applicant’s application includes removal of a residential zone that may accommodate up to 5 dwelling units , a replacement property is required to comply with Senate Bill 330. This is also known as a zero net loss of residential units. Therefore, if the City Council is going to overturn the Planning Commission’s decision, the City Council will also need to act on the General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone for property located at 645 S. 7th Street.

The location of the General Plan Amendment for 645 S. 7 th Street is below – Zoning Map is on the left and the general aerial is below – This property may accommodate up to 10 dwelling units:

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

1.1 Packet Pg. 10
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453
October 1, 2024

The Proje ct. The Applicant is proposing to develop a gasoline station with six fueling dispensers, 3,275 square foot convenience store and a single car drive -through car wash. The project also includes the development of a 9,484 square foot single story commercia l center which will accommodate approximately six commercial rental spaces. The project complies with Commercial Development Standards and includes half street improvements along the entire perimeter of the project site including curb, gutter, sidewalk an d a horse trail area as required by the Reche Canyon Specific Plan. The project is also required to install two electric vehicle charging stations.

Exhibit 1.0 below is a bird’s eye view of the project – North direction is to the left and perspective traveling into the center from Reche Canyon Dr., one of two primary driveways.

The commercial retail center is a single -story building 17 feet 8 -inches to 20 feet in height and there are some decorative parts of the project that are 26 feet in height. The maximum height of residential building is 35 -feet in height. Most of the rear area facing the residential will be 17 feet and 8-inches in height with a trail system and landscaping.

1.1 Packet Pg. 11
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453
October 1, 2024

Noise generated by the car wash will
need to be mitigated with the
installation of a 9 -foot-high acoustic
wall between the residential and car
wash entry, which can also be
accommodated with a three-foot berm
and wall totaling 9 feet in height.

The proposed project architecture is a
rustic farmhouse design that will
compliment a rural character for the
area with no specific architecture or specific building type, but certainly unique to the Reche Canyon area that includes both rural development patterns and more modern conventional residential subdivisions with modern sidewalks, curb and gutter. (See Attachments 11-14)

Traffic/Circulation. There would be two primary access points to the project site, both off of Reche Canyon Road. The first would be in the central portion of the project site off Reche Canyon Road al ong the eastern frontage of the project site. This access would provide right in/right out access only. The second access point would be at the southern end of the property, where the project would construct a driveway onto the Old Reche Canyon Road. The p roject would also provide an access driveway at the north end of the property. This north access driveway at the T-Intersection of Shadid Drive and Reche Canyon Road would be for emergency access only.

The project will be adding a second southbound through lane along Reche Canyon Road between Crystal Ridge Lane and Old Reche Canyon Road. The second southbound lane will be tapered back to one lane south of the intersection of Reche Canyon Road/Michelle Drive south of the project site. The project will als o add a Two -Way Left Turn Lane (TWLTL) median at the intersection of Reche Canyon Road/Shadid Drive. The TWLTL will extend from the north end of the southbound left turn lane at this intersection and will continue up to 150 feet south of this intersection, with provision of merging lane for the westbound left -turn traffic from Shadid Drive. Additionally, the project would include the installation of a signal at the Reche Canyon Road/Old Reche Canyon Road intersection. The project would also contribute its f air share responsibility for installing a signal and restriping the existing Two -Way Left Turn Lane (TWLTL) to a southbound left turn lane to provide approximately 100 ft. of vehicle storage length at Reche Canyon Road/Crystal Ridge Lane intersection. The street improvements also include a deceleration and acceleration lane from Shaded Drive, plus additional left turn acceleration lane from Shadid Drive which was incorporated after the Reche Canyon Traffic Ad - Hoc Committee Meeting.

The installation of two (2) Traffic Signals at the developer’s full upfront financial cost located at Reche Canyon Road/Crystal Ridge Lane and Reche Canyon Road/Old Reche Canyon Road is

1.1 Packet Pg. 12
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453
October 1, 2024

required. For the latter signal, the developer can enter into a reimbursement agreement in accordance with CMC 12.32.110 – Reimbursement for oversized or prior to constructed improvements to be reimbursed for applicable and city approved non -fair share costs; however, the developer shall be responsible for fronting all upfront costs prior to City B uilding Occupancy Permit.

While the applicant is only required to pay its fair share of the traffic signal at Crystal Ridge and Reche Canyon Drive, it will be required to have the signal constructed and operational prior to issuance of a Building Occupan cy Permit for the Commercial Project Development and additional funding to construct the traffic signal be reimbursed with new City projects. The developer will be responsible for upfront costs of the two traffic signals and other street improvements as pa rt of the project approval. On January 25, 2024, the project was scheduled and discussed at the Reche Canyon Traffic Ad -Hoc Committee meeting. There were a couple of changes made to the site plan and street improvement plan along Reche Canyon Drive because of the meeting which included:
• Addition of an acceleration lane turning left from Shadid Drive. This would require a portion of the center medium to be removed.
• Incorporation of an equestrian trail along Old Reche Canyon Drive. • Condition for the applicant to complete an landscaped and appropriate street closer at the end of Old Reche Canyon Drive and New Reche Canyon Drive, subject to review and approval by the City Engineer, and Development Services Director.

Several community meetings were held in Reche Canyon community facilities and more recent community meeting and Planning Commission study session were held to discuss the project from 2019, 2023 and 2024. The latest meeting held early this year included a Planning Commission Study Session held on December 12, 2023, Reche Canyon Traffic Ad -Hoc Committee meeting held on January 25, 2024, and final Public Hearing with the Planning Commission meeting held on June 11, 2024 (Attachment 3, 4, & 5). Correspondence in favor and opposing is attached (Attachments 8 and 9).

Environmental Determination. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR), State Clearinghouse No. 2019039115, with appropriate findings and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is proposed for adoption by the City Council pursuant to Section 15070 and 15074 of the Guidelines of the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) if the City Council decides to approve the project (See Attachment 10 ). The EIR concluded that all impacts could be mitigated to a less than significant level, therefore a Statement of Overriding Considerations was not prepared for this Project.

The Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Reche Canyon Plaza Project was published on May 29, 2024 and made available to the public via the City Environmental Documents Website, hard copies were provided with the City’s Main Library, City Hall Information Booth, and Development Services Public Counter. Staff also announced the Final EIR publication on the City’s Facebook page. The primary objectives of the EIR pr ocess under

1.1 Packet Pg. 13
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453
October 1, 2024

the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code (PRC), Division 13, are to inform decision makers and the public about a project’s potential significant environmental effects, identify possible ways to minimize significan t effects, and consider reasonable alternatives to the project. The Final EIR is composed of the Draft EIR, Technical Appendices, comments received during the public review period, responses to those comments, and an Errata section that clarifies, amplifie s, or makes minor modifications to the Draft EIR text. The Draft EIR and Technical Appendices are provided in Appendix A of the Final EIR.

As prescribed by the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 14, Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of th e California Environmental Quality Act, Sections 15088 and 15132, the Lead Agency, the City, is required to evaluate comments on environmental issues received from persons and agencies that reviewed the Draft EIR and provide written responses to those comments as part of the Final EIR. This Response to Comments document, together with the Draft EIR, will comprise the Final EIR for this project. The Final EIR hard copy is available for review at the City’s main library and at the Development Services Department front counter. An electronic copy is available at the following website link:
https://www.ci.colton.ca.us/779/Environmental-Documents

Responses to Comments: Nineteen comment lett ers were received during the public review period. Three comment letters were received from two County of San Bernardino (County) agencies and tribal government. The remaining 16 comment letters were received from members of the general public. The Final EIR organizes each of the comments and responses. Some public comments received on the Draft EIR may be outside the scope of the EIR evaluation of environmental impacts or are opinions without evidentiary basis. For non -environmental comments, such as quest ions or concerns on other planning or socioeconomic issues, or comments that offer the commentator’s opinions in support of or opposition to the project itself, no change to the Final EIR is required.

The comments were diverse and included a mix of conce rns about the project. There were comments related to biological resources, traffic/circulation, wildlife species, concerns of removal of food and water resources, and other similar concerns. It is always encouraged for commenters to submit the basis for their comments and should submit data or references offering facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts, or expert opinion supported by facts in support of the comments. Many of the comments did not provide basis or supporting information to about their c oncern. However, this does not mean that the area was avoided or ignored, but no supporting information about the concern and no other supporting facts about a concern makes it difficult for staff and environmental consultant to recognize the comment as an adverse impact from development of the Project. The project does include a list of mitigation measures which has also been organized and provided as a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program if the Planning Commission considers recommending City Council approval of the Project.

The issues with traffic/circulation were amongst the most received comments. The response from the City’s Environmental Consultant, LSA, noted that “The safety analysis concluded that the

1.1 Packet Pg. 14
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453
October 1, 2024

existing accident rate in the study ar ea is lower than the State average. The safety analysis also concluded that project traffic would not significantly change the traffic flow pattern within the neighborhood, nor would it increase the traffic collision rate. Furthermore, the safety analysis concluded that project’s proposed improvements and design features would enhance safety along the project frontage.”

Planning Commission Decision. On June 11, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 4 -1-0 Recommending to the City Co uncil Denial of the Project and all associated applications, including the request to Amend the Reche Canyon Specific Plan from Estate Density Zone to Commercial Zone. The primary reasons for the Commission’s recommendation to deny the requested land use change include land use incompatibility with existing surrounding uses, placement of commercial property would eventually be a problem with noise, lighting, and further exacerbating existing traffic congestion of the area. All of the zoning entitlements d escribed above move forward with the Planning Commission’s recommendation for denial and alternative recommendations provided as a standard practice.

Planning Commission executed Resolution Number R-11-24 is in Attachment 6.

If the project was going to be considered for approval the Planning Commission provided the following comments that the City Council should consider:
 Not approve 24-hour gasoline station hours by restricting hours of operation from 6:00 a.m to 10:00 p.m.
 Increase the number of charg ing stations on the site to equal he same amount of gasoline pump stations. (six fueling dispensers are proposed)
 Consideration of allocating a future commercial tenant space for Police Substation/Community Room.
 Consider looking into capturing property ta x from the project to go back directly to Reche Canyon Area.

Subsequent to the Planning Commission hearing, t he applicant also generated a Fiscal Revenue Analysis prepared by D evelopment Planning & Finance Group (DPFG) . DPFG , founded in 1991, is a transaction oriented real estate consulting firm with a focus on a public finance and the fiscal, economic, and financial impacts of development. (Attachment 7) More information about this firm may be found at the following website: https://www.dpfg.com/

FISCAL IMPACTS

If the project moves forward for approval, building permit fees and annual sales tax will be generated by project. Temporary new jobs will be created during construction of the project and additional minor employment opportunities will be created by new gasoline services station and new small commercial retail/services added to the area by this construction project. An increase in property value is also anticipated with the construction of this project.

ALTERNATIVES

1.1 Packet Pg. 15
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453
October 1, 2024

 Provide staff with alternative direction or

See attachments 15 through 19 below:
 Adopt Resolution Nos. R -93-24, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Colton certifying the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse # 20190391 15) for the Reche Canyon Plaza Project; adopting findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. (FILE INDEX NUMBER DAP-001-453); and

 Adopt Ordinance No. O -12-24 an Ordinance of t he City Council Approving an Ordinance for Reche Canyon Specific Plan Amendment to Change the Land Use Designation from Estate Density Zone to Commercial Zone. (FILE INDEX NUMBER DAP-001-453); and

 Adopt Resolution No. R -94-24 a Resolution of the City Cou ncil of the City of Colton Amending the Colton General Plan Land Use Element changing the Land Use of Parcel 0163-172-48 or 645 south 7 th street from General Commercial to Mixed -Use Downtown. (FILE INDEX NUMBER DAP-001-453); and

 Adopt Ordinance No. O -15-24 an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Colton amending section 18.06.020 (Official Zoning Map) changing Parcel 0163 -172-48 from C-2 (general commercial) to M -U/D (Mixed Use Downtown) for Assessor Parcel Number 0163-172-48 or 645 South 7 th Street. (FILE INDEX NUMBER DAP -001-453); and

 Adopt Resolution No. R -95-24 a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Colton approving Conditional Use Permit (DAP -001-453) to allow a 24 -hour, gasoline service station, drive -through car wash, and conveni ence store, and an Architectural and Site Plan Review to approve the site plan, site improvements, landscaping plans, and architectural elevations for the proposed retail sales (indoors), convenience store, and gasoline service station with drive -through c ar wash on property measuring approximately 2.90 acres located at 2501 Reche Canyon Road. (FILE INDEX NO. DAP- 001-453)

ATTACHMENT

1. Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial

2. Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial

3. Attachment 3_Draft Meeting Minutes of the Reche Canyon Traffic Ad-Hoc Committee_01- 25-24

4. Attachment 4_Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes_June 11, 2024

5. Attachment 5_Planning Commission Reso No. R-11-24

1.1 Packet Pg. 16
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453
October 1, 2024

6. Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24

7. Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project

8. Attachment 8_Applicant's_Fiscal Revenue Analysis_9.3.2024

9. Attachment 9_City Council Reso No. R-92-24_Denial

10. Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

11. Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453

12. Alternative Action Attachment 15_CC Reso_R-93-24_DAP-001-453_Final EIRv1

13. Alternative Action Attachment 16_CC Ordinance_O-12-24_DAP-001-453_SP Amend

14. Alternative Action Attachment 17_CC Reso_R-94-24_DAP-001-453_GPA

15. Alternative Action Attachment 18_CC Ordinance_O-15-24_DAP-001-453_Change of Zone

16. Alternative Action Attachment 19_CC Reso_R-95-24_DAP-001-453_Arch and Site_CUP

1.1 Packet Pg. 17

ATTACHMENT 1

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 09W" 0Ma Do0004Z ±
DECEMBER 4, 1990
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Colton was held on the above given date at 7: 30 p. m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, Mayor Gonzales presiding.

Mayor Gonzales led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

ROLL CALL:

Council Members present were Roman, Cisneros, Lofy, and Mayor Gonzales.

Also present were City Manager Sotelo, City Attorney Edwards, and City Clerk Ramos. Absent was Councilman Rehrer.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

City Manager Sotelo stated Item No. 9, Special Districts, under the Con- sent Calendar, will be removed and brought back at a later date. 1) Minutes
November 20, 1990 ( Regular)
November 26, 1990 ( Special)
November 27, 1990 ( Adjourned)
2) Warrants
98349 - 98754
164291 - 164498, 164499 - 164688
November 29, 1990
3) Appeals
Set for Public Hearing, Tuesday, December 18, 1990, Appeal filed by Kencor Corporation ( Gregg Kent), on Planning Com- mission decision of File Index No. DC - 65- 90, Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Tract.
4) Appeals
Set for Public Hearing, Tuesday, December 18, 1990, Appeal of Planning Commission decision concerning a Tentative Tract and Environmental Review for a Subdivision in an R- 1 Zone, File Index No. DT - 64- 90.
5) Appeals
Set for Public Hearing, Tuesday, December 18, 1990, Appeal of Planning Commisison decision on major Variance request for wall sign, File Index No. DSV - 70- 90.
6) Zone Change/ General Plan Amendment
Set for Public Hearing, Tuesday, December 18, 1990, Zone Change, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment and Environmental Review on 78 acres in the Agua Mansa Specific Plan area, File Index No. DAG - 67- 90.

Wo
1 b,

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 7) Personnel
Adopt new Job Description for the position of Fire Chief. 8) Contracts
Request approval for Tri County to repair Street Pump in the amount of $ 5, 800, urgency matter.
9) Special Districts
Authorization to sell Parcel 2, Parcel Map # 12446, to Colton Joint Unified School District per Community Facilities District No. 89- 1 Agreement, Cooley Ranch Elementary School Site. ( Re- moved from the Consent Calendar)
10) Claims
Patricia Price, Mildred Tantardini, versus the City of Colton.

Recommend denial.

Moved by Councilman Lofy, seconded by Councilwoman Cisneros, to approve the Consent Calendar, with deletion of Item No. 9. Unanimous vote.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL ITEMS:

Resolutions
Resolutions of Commendation were read in full by Councilwoman Cisneros honoring Police officer Joe Gutierrez and Police Service Dog " Cello", by Councilman Roman honoring Police officer William Burrows and Police Service Dog " Tasso", by Mayor Gonzales honoring Police Officer Victor Paul and Police Service Dog " Dack", and by Councilman Lofy honoring Police Service Dog " Dack" Canine German Shepherd.

Captain Stratton also presented to Police officer Victor Paul a Service Award Medal honoring the Canine German Shepherd Police Service Dog Dack" upon his retirement, due to declining health, after approximate- ly eight years of service with the City of Colton.

Mr. Charles Gabriel, President of Redlands Federal Bank, donated a check in the amount of $ 1, 500, towards the purchase of a new Police Service Dog.

Captain Stratton advised that Stater Bros. has also donated an amount of $ 1, 000, towards the purchase of a new Police Service Dog, which costs approximately $ 6, 000.

PUBLIC HEARINGS:

Extension on Zone Change
Mayor Gonzales declared the Continuance of the Public Hearing.

City Clerk Ramos submitted the Affidavit of Posting Continuance and re- ported that no protests or objections had been received.

Community Development Director Aguilera reported on a request from 0C
2 1.1.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Vanir Development Company, Merle and Betty Workman, for another ex- tension of File Index No. A- 4- 88, Zone Change, adopted by Ordinance No. 0- 30- 88, and File Index No. D- 73- 88.

Mr. Aguilera stated Ordinance No. 0- 30- 88 contained ten conditions of approval, of which Nos. 3, 51 6, and 8 are of the upmost importance to the City, with the Plaza Las Flores and Five Points Shopping Center developments expecting to break ground soon.

Mr. Aguilera concluded Staff recommends a six- month extension be granted, from September 13, 1990, and that the City Council advise the applicants no further extensions will be granted.

Mayor Gonzales asked if anyone present desired to speak on this matter.

Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Lofy, to close the Public Hearing. Unanimous vote.

Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Lofy, to approve Staff' s recommendation to grant an extension of six months to the appli- cants for File Index Nos. A- 4- 88 and D- 73- 88, and no further extensions on this matter. Unanimous vote.

Hazard Waste Management Plan
Mayor Gonzales declared the Public Hearing open.

City Clerk Ramos submitted the Affidavit of Publication and reported that no protests or objections had been received.

Community Development Director Aguilera reported on a Hazardous Waste Management Plan for the City, stating once the Department of Health Services approves the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan, under 1987 legislation, every city within that county will have 180 days following receipt of a written notice of approval to take action in one of three ways - adopt a City Hazardous Waste Management Plan con- sistent with the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan; incorporate portions of the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan into Cities General Plans; or enact an ordinance that requires all City land use approvals to be consistent with citing criteria of the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Mr. Aguilera advised the deadline to act on one of the three options is December 18, 1990.

Mr. Aguilera concluded Staff has reviewed the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan and recommends adopting the Plan, together with First Reading of Ordinance No. 0- 19- 90.

Mayor Gonzales asked if anyone present desired to speak on this matter.

Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Lofy, to close the Public Hearing. Unanimous vote.

Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Roman, to approve and adopt the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan and First Reading, 3 L r

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) and waive full reading, of Ordinance No. 0- 19- 90. Unanimous vote.

ORDINANCE NO. 0- 19- 90 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLTON CITY COUNCIL First Reading) ADOPTING THE COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN BY REFERENCE.

Reche Canyon Specific Plan
Mayor Gonzales declared the Public Hearing open.

City Clerk Ramos submitted the Affidavit of Publication and reported that many Speakers' Cards have been received this evening, along with a letter from Barbara Cram Riordan, County Board of Supervisors, which Community Development Director Aguilera will report on.

Community Development Director Aguilera reported on the proposed Reche Canyon Specific Plan initiated in January, 1988, and developed by the consulting firm of POD/ Sasaki, along with the corresponding Environ- mental Impact Report.

Mr. Aguilera continued the Plan is a regulatory document intended to provide detailed development standards for land use, circulation, public service, design and landscaping within the Reche Canyon area, between Barton Road on the north and the San Bernardino County line on the south, and consisting of approximately 2, 920 acres. The Plan is more detailed and site- specific than the traditional zoning tools, while allowing for a high degree of development flexibility.

Mr. Aguilera advised Government Code Section 65451 states that a Speci- fic Plan shall include graphics and text that discuss in detail - the distribution, location and extent of the uses of land, including open space, within the area covered by the Plan; the proposed distribution, location, and extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities proposed to be located with the area; any and all development and design standards, including criteria for conserving, developing, and utilizing natural resources; a program for implementation measures including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures to implement all of these items. The Reche Canyon Specific Plan is consistent with all of the State require- ments noted.

Mr. Aguilera spoke about the seven member Reche Canyon Advisory Committee, appointed by the City Council, and representatives from the City of Loma Linda and the Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside, who held many meetings and discussed in great detail the proposed Plan.

Mr. Aguilera stated the Environmental Impact Report has been submitted to all interested and responsible agencies and is currently being re- viewed by the State Office of Planning and Research. The E. I. R. also meets the State guidelines for Specific Plan content and requirements. 4 I1 S

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) m
Mr. Aguilera then reviewed amendments to the Plan, which were discussed at the Planning Commission meetings of November 13 and 27, 1990, and have been approved by the Planning Commission, as follows:

1. All residential or commercial structures shall be built with fire sprinkler systems as approved by the Colton Fire Department.

2. All setbacks for residential structures shall be setback 35 feet from the front property line. The Planning Commission may reduce that to a distance of not less than 25 feet only if the reduction will significantly reduce grading.

3. All lots must be not less than 20, 000 square feet in size.

4. All residential and commercial structures must be constructed with seismically activated gas shutoff valves.

5. The Specific Plan shall establish that there exist non- critical slopes which may be graded under the following conditions:

A non- critical slope is defined as a slope which does not form part of a view shed. Normally, these slopes are contained in valleys or bowls not visable from most vantage points.

A non- critical slope may have a slope coefficient of up to 35%.

Mr. Aguilera also referred to a letter dated December 4, 1990, from Barbara Cram Riordan, Board of Supervisors, wherein Supervisor Riordan requested that the land within Planning Area 3 be changed to a Low Density Land Use category in the unincorporated area. Mr. Aguilera advised that the Planning Commission also heard this request and recommended against it.

Mr. Aguilera concluded based on the information submitted, Staff recom- mends the City Council adopt the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, by First Reading of Ordinance No. 0- 18- 90, and the Environmental Impact Report.

A resolution amending the General Plan will be presented to the Council at the time of Second Reading of Ordinance No. 0- 18- 90.

Mayor Gonzales stated there are many residents that have filled out Speaker Cards that desire to be heard on this matter. Mayor Gonzales asked that each one keep their presentation to a minimum of 3 minutes.

Eugene McMeans, 2025 South Glenwood, spoke in favor of the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, and of all the time and effort spent on development of the proposed Plan.

Tricia Ruminski, 3012 Shadid Drive, spoke in favor of the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, requesting that the City not lower the density more than a 1/ 2 acre.

Mel Albiso, 2575 Carbon Court, spoke in favor of the Reche Canyon Spe- cific Plan as it was written, recommending the City Council go with what the Plan states. Mr. Albiso said he did not agree with the Planning 5 1.1.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Commission recommendations.

Geri Farris, 7841 Reche Canyon Road, spoke in favor of the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, requesting the City preserve the larger lot size, look at vacant areas for more park space, provide good location for the school, consider more equestrian trails, and work towards controlling the in- crease in traffic congestion.

Alice C. Moore, 11825 Reche Canyon Road, stated she would like to re- quest a zone change on their property, they no longer have their pri- vacy. Ms. Moore said she hoped that traffic and safety factors will be considered and better roads, and she would like to see the density changed from 2 units per acre to 4 units per acre.

Faye Pribble, 1803 Myrtlewood, said she would urge the City Council to adopt the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, that she could live with the 1/ 2 acre minimum, and she liked riding the equestrian trails.

David Anderson, 2571 Carbon Court, spoke in favor of the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, stating there is no need for additional commercial de- velopment, the City should endeavor to reduce the traffic congestion in the Canyon, there is a need for more parks, and inclusion for the wildlife.

Maria Alvarez, 2200 John Matich Drive, spoke in favor of the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, stating there is a need for more recreational areas and parks, especially for the children and senior citizens.

Carol Bartels, 2787 Reche Canyon Road, spoke in favor of the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, stating that proper ingress and egress should be provided and additional horse trails. Ms. Bartels stated the Council should con- sider those residents that live in the Specific Plan area.

Bill Warkentin, Warkentin Wraight, 3197 C Airport Loop, Costa Mesa, speaking on behalf of Relco Industries, stated they are prepared to sup- port the Council in providing continued review and comment in pursuit of a reasonable Reche Canyon Specific Plan, however, they would request that the City Council remove the minimum lot standard of 1/ 2 acre and allow lots down to 7, 200 sq. ft. to be plotted, adopt a revised set of grading standards based on the Warkentin Wraight " full featured" analy- sis program, establish as a matter of policy that a variety of housing types is appropriate for future development within the Canyon, and re- move their property, located at the northwest corner of the Canyon, in Planning Area 1 from the jurisdiction of the Specific Plan as it is not a part of Reche Canyon proper.

Clare Jean Smith, 11794 Reche Canyon Road, stated she was a sister to Ms. Moore who spoke earlier. Ms. Smith said they live in a County pocket, east of the channel, and the majority of the area is flat land.

Ms. Smith stated there is a need for a 4 - lane road through the Canyon, and she was hopeful that the Council would seriously consider the re- quest made by Supervisor Barbara Riordan.
4 1590
6 JD

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Andy Gunn, 3017 Shadid Drive, stated he supported the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, however, he was concerned about developers in the Canyon.

Mr. Gunn said he bought his land to have space, he felt the City should look at decreasing the density, control growth, and retain the 1/ 2 acre minimum. Mr. Gunn said there is no need for more traffic on Reche Canyon Road.

Dennis Hansberger, 1323 West Colton Avenue, Redlands, spoke in favor of the basic concept of the Specific Plan, however, he did not agree with the amendments recommended by the Planning Commission. Mr. Hansberger also discussed developments, rules and regulations, etc. Mr. Hansberger suggested the City adopt the Plan that the Committee agreed upon.

Claire Deann Harrington, 11574 Reche Canyon Road, stated she would like to see the zoning stay as it is, and would like to see the Reche Canyon Specific Plan pass as it stands now. Ms. Harrington said she enjoys riding horses in the Canyon.

Jim Sullivan, 101 East Redlands Boulevard, # 219, Redlands, spoke against the Reche Canyon Specific Plan as it has been amended. Mr. Sullivan said there is a need for 7, 200 sq. ft. lots.

William Grimes, 2592 Gunnison Way, stated the majority of Canyon resi- dents do not want development as in other areas and enjoy the openness of the Canyon. Mr. Grimes said the City should follow the intent of the Plan.

Richard Prieto, 634 East " H" Street, stated he is a member of the Planning Commission, and if the City wants to take care of the children in the Canyon, keep the 1/ 2 acre minimum lots.

Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Roman, the Public Hearing was terminated. Unanimous vote.

Councilman Lofy asked that Community Development Director Aguilera re- spond to comments made by Mr. Bill Warkentin and the Relco Industries property.

Mr. Aguilera stated Relco Industries would like their area, in Planning Area 1, deleted from the Plan and considered at a later date. Mr.

Aguilera said this involves a 90 - acre parcel and it needs to be a part of the Plan.

Councilman Roman said he was concerned about commercial development in the Canyon at the location of a small corner store, which had been there for some time and was very rural - looking. Mr. Roman stated this store was a source of shopping for the Canyon residents, and he did not feel a more modern facility would fit in. Mr. Roman said he was concerned about creating " commercial pockets" in the Canyon. Mr. Roman concluded he would like to have the proposed commercial development at that particular location deleted, and leave the little country store as is.

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Discussion followed among Councilmembers and Staff, afterwhich it was suggested this matter be returned to the Planning Commission for their review of the requested changes concerning commercial development.

Moved by Councilman Roman, seconded by Councilman Lofy, to approve the Reche Canyon Specific Plan and the Planning Commission amendments, with the exception of the matter relating to commercial zoning, and that the commercial zoning issue be referred back to the Planning Commission.

Unanimous vote.

CITY MANAGER' S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

UPrcnnnP1
City Manager Sotelo reported on the new Job Description for Economic/ Redevelopment Coordinator, which would replace that of Senior Planner, in order to recruit for the vacant position. There would be no change in salary for the position.

Mr. Sotelo recommended approval of the new Job Description for Economic/ Redevelopment Coordinator and Resolution No. R- 135- 90, amending the City' s Pay and Classification Plan.

Moved by Mayor Gonzales, seconded by Councilman Lofy, to approve Staff' s recommendation and Resolution No. R- 135- 90. Unanimous vote.

RESOLUTION NO. R- 135- 90 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. R- 49- 90.

Closed Session
City Manager Sotelo requested a Closed Session at the end of the Meeting.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:

Mr. Richard Prieto, 634 East " H" Street, spoke about a " Candeleria" held at Green Acres Cemetery last week, which was very impressive and beautiful, with the theme of Christmas. Mr. Prieto said he would like to see something similar done at Hermosa Cemetery, if possible.

Mayor Gonzales suggested Mr. Prieto get in touch with City Clerk Ramos, the Hermosa Cemetery Manager.

Councilman Roman reported on the training of soldiers in the river bottom, the destroying of property and vegetation, and requested this matter be checked into.

Par, acC
The City Council recessed at 10: 02 p. m., to take up the business of the Redevelopment Agency for the City of Colton, and reconvened at 10: 12 p. m., all Members present.
8 LV

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) CLOSED SESSION:

The City Council adjourned to Closed Session at 10: 12 p. m., to discuss Personnel Matters, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, and Liti- gation, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956. 9( a), and reconvened at 11: 31 p. m., all Members present.

ADJOURNMENT:

Moved by Councilman Lofy, seconded by Councilman Roman and unanimously passed, Mayor Gonzales adjourned the Meeting at 11: 35 p. m.

HELEN A. RAMOS, CMC
City Clerk
City of Colton
9 DEC

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: HONORABLE MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL Q
FOR: Council Meeting of 4 December 1990
FROM: Jaime R. Aguilera, Director of Community Development/'`/ SUBJECT: Environmental Review of Proposed Reche Canyon Specific Plan File Index Number D- 60- 90
E

EXISTING CONDITIONS

1. Location:

N
The Reche Canyon area between Barton Road on the North, and the San Bernardino County Line on the South.
2- Area: Q
2, 920 acres ( approximate)

3. Existing Use: A
Mixed rural and suburban residential, with a minimal amount of commercial, serving area residents.

4. General Plan Designation: R
Residential Estates

5. Existing Zoning:

RE ( Residential Estates)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
In January of 1988, the City of Colton initiated the development of the Reche Canyon Specific Plan in response to citizen concerns over growth pressures as well as the evi- 0dent visual and land use impacts of new tract developments and increased traffic along Reche Canyon Road. The Colton City Council, along with the City of Loma Linda and the County of San Bernardino, authorized the preparation of this Plan. The consulting firm of POD/Sasakiwas contracted with to develop the plan and corresponding Environ- mental Impact Report
The Pian is a regulatory document, intended to provide detailed development standards for land use, circulation, public services, design and landscaping, within the Reche DRIGINAt
Agenda Report cc- reche 1
CENTR L QGrnanc
FILE NO. _ ` . 4 :............

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Canyon area, while allowing for a high degree of development flexibility. The Plan is more detailed and site -speck than the traditional zoning tools.

In compliance with California state law, the specific plan provides a link between the r± area General Plans, with their broad policies, and the detailed procedures and restric- tions inherent in implementation tools such as the Zoning Ordinance, Government Code Section 65451 states that a specific plan shall include graphics and text that discuss In detail all of the following subjects:

1. The distribution, location and extent of the uses of land, including open space, within the area covered by the plan. N

2. The proposed distribution, location, and extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area D

3. Any and all development and design standards, including criteria for conserving, developing, and utilizing natural resources.

4. A program for implementation measures including regulations, programs, public Q works projects, and financing measures to implement all of the above.

The Reche Canyon Specific Plan is consistent with all of the State requirements noted above.

R
The process involved input from Reche Canyon residents, surrounding communities, developers, and City Departments regarding the issues of land use and development in Reche Canyon. Seven Reche Canyon Advisory Committee members were appointed Eby the City Council. The entire eleven member committee represented the City of Colton, City of Loma Linda, the County of San Bernardino, and the County of Riverside.

Numerous meetings were conducted, covering the issues of concern, including but not limitedto; land use patterns, geology, topography, flooding, vegetation, cultural re- sources, traffic, and seismicity.

The final Draft Reche Canyon Specific Plan reflects the compromise and the balance achieved through these meetings. Although some interested persons may not see all that they would like to see in the plan, the standards set out in this document recognize the diversity of development potential as well as the need to preserve the character of the Canyon, while addressing that potential.

The Environmental Impact Report has been submitted to all interested and responsible R agencies. It is also currently being reviewed by the State Office of Planning and Re- search. The date of clearance from OPR is November 29; 1990, which is prior to the an- ticipated City Council Public Hearing dates for the Plan and E.I.R. T Agenda Report cc- reche 2

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) The E. I.R. also meets the State guidelines for Specific Plan content and requirements.

G
Based on the above, staff recommends that the City Council pass first reading and waive full reading of the attached ordinance adopting the Plan and Environmental Im- pact Report The resolution amending the General Plan will be presented to the City Council during the second reading of the Ordinance.

N

CITY MANAGER' S CONCURRENC

CITY OF COLTON

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

PLANNING DIVISION
0 0
E
0 Ln
Agenda Report cc- reche 3

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 1 2
3 4
5 6' I
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 III
23 24
25 26
27 28
ORDINANCE N0. 0- 18- 90

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLTON CITY COUNCIL
AMENDING ORDINANCE 1602, ADDING SECTION 18. 12. 158

TO CREATE THE RECHE CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN KNOWN AS
FILE NUMBER D- 60- 90. AN ORDINANCE ALSO APPROVING

OF, AND ACCEPTING AS COMPLETE, THE RECHE CANYON
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.

WHEREAS, the City of Colton City Council has held a public hearing as required by law to consider the Reche Canyon Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City has commissioned the creation of the
Specific Plan in order to provide for the orderly, aesthetic development of Reche Canyon; and
WHEREAS, The City Council has found the Specific Plan to further the goals of the City and to benefit the Canyon Residents; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found the Plan' s Draft
Environmental Impact Report ( EIR) to be comprehensive and complete;
NOW THEREFORE, BE. IT ORDAINED that the City Council of the City of Colton does hereby approve the Reche Canyon Specific Plan and further the City Council does find the Environmental Impact Report to be of sufficient scope and completeness.

BE IT. FURTHER ORDAINED that the two documents are hereby adopted by reference.

APPROVED and ADOPTED this
ATTEST:

HELEN A. RAMOS
City Clerk
day of , 19_.

FRANK A. GONZALES, Mayor

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
91 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) as.

CITY OF COLTON )
I, HELEN A. RAMOS, City Clerk of the City of Colton,
California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of said City and was approved by the Mayor of said City at a _ regular meeting
of said City Counci1 held on the day of
19__, and that it was so adopted as follows:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

SEAL)
City Clerk of the City
of Colton, California

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

CITY OF COLTON )
I, HELEN A. RAMOS, City Clerk of the City of Colton,
California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Ordinance No. _ , and
that the same has not been amended or repealed.

SEAL)
DATED: ,, 19
City Clerk of the City
of Colton, California

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

CITY OF COLTON

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission DATE: 30 ! November 41990
FROM: Jaime R. Aguilera, Directow"
Y"
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Proposed amendments to the Reche Canyon Specific Plan The following are proposed amendments to the Reche Canyon Specific Plan as discussed during the Planning Commission meetings of November 13 and 27, 1990:

All residential or commercial structures shall be built with fire sprinkler systems as approved by the Colton Fire Department.
2) All setbacks for residential structures shall be setback 35 feet from Lhe front property line. The Planning Commission may reduce that to a uistance of not less than 25 feet only if the reduction will signifi- antly reduce grading.
3) All lots must be not less than 20; 000 square feet in size. 4) All residential and commercial structures must be constructed with seismically activated gas shutoff valves.
5) The Specific Plan stall establish that there exist non- critical slopes which may be graded under the following conditions:

A) A non- critical slope is defined as a slope which does not form part of a view shed. Normally, these slopes are cotnained in valleys or bowls not visible frrom most vantage points.

R1 A non- critical slope may have a slope coefficient of up to 35%. 2k; idi i 15

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) L
raottrb of fuperuiuors
Tountil of # an Nernarbino
December 4, 1990
Frank Gonzales, Mayor
City Council Members
City of Colton
650 North La Cadena Drive
Colton, CA 92324
Dear Mayor Gonzales and Councilmembers,

BARBARA CRAM RIORDAN

CHAIRMAN

SUPERVISOR THIRD DISTRICT
This letter serves as a formal request to modify a minor county portion of the proposed Reche Canyon Specific Plan which is scheduled to be heard today, December 4, 1990.

I would respectfully request that within Planning Area Three specifically the area: west of Reche Canyon Road, east of the San Bernardino Flood Control Channel, north of Pepper Tree Lane and south of the southerly boundary of Planning Area Two) ( See Exhibit I), be changed to a Low Density Land Use category in the unincorporated area. This land is relatively flat and is adjoined by similar densities within your city boundaries.

Let me also at this time extend my appreciation to the Task Force volunteers and the city staff for their time and effort on this plan. The Plan provides for orderly development as well as an excellent trail system.

Thank you for your consideration of my request.

Sin rely,

RBARA CRAM RIORDAN
hai rman .

BCR: bc
SanBernardinoCountyGovernmentCenter • 385 North ArrowheadAvenue 9 SanBernt4no, CA 92415-0110 • ( 714) 387- 4855 0 ( 714) 825. 4050

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) r p
P
i
C
t r,
S
k,
Q
CLo z
Ca
W
m
t0000 .
z m z
W >.

E }
E °°
ro
m wCL. Zm way . a wA Wro
Z _ F - a U
Q W
Wro
Qw t ro Q
p z ° ' c-
cn
O a C
ui W C
W
Wro
V a _ Z
Z W z
max c%i WC C
FQ-
O UJ c) W Q
V.
051

LAJ C N
GJ.

C. 3 Z
W

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

W A R K E N T I N W R A I G H T
December 4 1990
I,ri: d!Df Je'
Mayor, City of Colton
Civic Center sr, c ;-
650 N. La Cadena Drive f sta > ^,:: cr
Colton, Ca 92324
Subject: Reche Canyon Specific Plan
Project: TTM 14830, Relco Industries, Planning Area 1
Mr. Mayor:

Relco Industries has for the last two years attempted to proceed with the processing of Tentative Tract Map 14830and duringthat time willinglyparticipatedin the RecheCanyonSpecificPlan (RCSP) as a member of the Community Advisory Committee. Their participation was offered in good faith with the reasonable expectation that recommendations of the Advisory Committee would be followed, at least in terms of overall planning policies. Unhappily, this is not the case. The requirement that all new projects within the RCSP area be developed with minimum lots of one- half acre ( 21,000SF) quite literally prohibits many potential sites from being developed at all, particularly those adjacent to existing standard lot subdivisions.

The reason: Those who have purchased a single family home on a 7200 SF lot will in our experience, quite vehemently fight the approval of equestrian estates next to their non -equestrian lots. People, it seems, either love horses or want them far away and downwind.

The following points are offered for your consideration while you discuss our request to remove the Relco Industries property from the RCSP area or remove the half acre lot minimum size requirement.

1. In Dec. 1988, Relco Industries agreed to participate in the Reche Canyon Specific Plan ( RCSP).

Relco volunteered to participate, at the City's request, in order to contribute their experience and expertise in resolving the planning issues confronting the specific plan area.

2. When first asked to participate in the RCSP, Relco recognized that the Canyon was in the process of change from a rural to a suburban environment. It was, in fact, the appropriate control of the suburbanization' of Reche Canyon that prompted Relco' s participation.

3. It is important to recognize that Relco' s project is small and located at the north- west corner of the Canyon in Planning Area 1. From the RCSP, " It ( Planning Area 1) is not a part of Reche Canyon proper either from a circulation stand point or from a topographic stand point "( Page 32. RCSP)
A. The Relco property drains away from the RecheCanyonwatershedarea.

B. The Relco property is not visable from Reche Canyon proper.

C. Primary access is from Barton Road, thus eliminating traffic impacts on Reche Canyon Road while providing the necessary improvements to Barton Road.

With the above circumstances as givens, it would appear that the logic for the inclusion of the Relco property in the specific plan area is in question.

4. Relco was prepared to file TTM 14830 ( the lower 50 acres under Relco ownership) 18 months ago and at that time, there was no question about the acceptability of 7200 SF lots. The TTM was, however, put on hold at the City' s request to await a projected 6 to 9 months of specific plan process. ( The TTM was actually filed in May,1990 due to the delayed development of the RCSP ).

W%IiA
v

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

5. A detailed examination of the plan yields some interesting results in terms of what the half acre minimum lot size really means. Only Low Density land use areas are affected by this change. All lower density zones will comply with the half acre lot standard. Virtually all Intermediate and High Density zones are already built out so they will also be unaffected.

What remains is the 460 acres of Low Density area in the Colton portion of the plan area. Since much of what has been developed recently is in the Low DensityCategory of 2-4 du/ac, perhaps as much as 2/ 3' s of the 460 acres is already developed. Which results in something like 160 acres of potential development area in the Low Density classification. Based on our experience in planning property within the " badlands" it is seldom that more than 60% of the total land area is ultimately developed and often it is considerably less. Even at a maximumnet density of 4 du/ac (7200 SF lots), the total unit count would be unlikely to rise above 400 units, which is only 2.5 du/ac on the gross area, lower even than the " target" density for the zone.

Further, the elimination of " smaller" lots, like 7200, 8000, 10, 000, and 12- 15, 000 SF estates effectively prohibits clustering of development and may result in exactly the opposite effect of promoting development of ridgelines simply to maximize the development return to the owner.

6. The 1.5 du/ac density proposed by Relco is well below the target density proposed for Medium density: 3 Du/Ac. The maximum density calculationsby Relco, however, are based on gross acreage includingthe easementwhichwill be utilizedas "landscapedopenarea" and hikingtrails. Because the Edison easement so severely affects some propertiesand others not at all, the City should allow easement areas to be included in the gross density calculation.

7. The RCSP is intended to set standards for land use and "to determine the most appropriate uses for areas in greater detail than would otherwise be possible through traditional zoning tools" ( page 1, RCSP ). By requiring 1/2 acre lots in all new residential development, the RCSP provides no flexibilityin producttypes. This is counterto the HousingElementof the GeneralPlanand is contrary to current market performance. It should be noted that not all equestrian owners want to live with their horses on- site. Many families with horses wish to board them off-site in a nearby stable that offers convenient access and none of the maintenance and environmental nuisances of back yard stables.

8. The support for minimum 1/2 acre lots rests primarily in the equestrian ownership that makes up an estimated 3% of the total Canyon families. They are a vocal and enthusiastic minority but should not be seen as the representative voice of the entire Canyon community. At the most recent Planning Commission hearing on the RCSP it should be noted that as many residents and owners spoke opposing half acre lots as spoke for them. This vocal minority wishing to preserve its life style ( with no apparent regard for the life style choices of others) should not dictate the direction for all current residents as well as those voiceless but nonetheless real future residents.

9. The adoption of the 1/2 acre minimum lot size requirement quite effectively down -zones every undeveloped piece of land in the specific plan to a maximum realistic density of approximately 1 du/ac. This is completely contrary to the spirit and direction of months and months of planning research and design by POD/Sasaki and the substantial time and money contribution on the part of the canyon residents and developers.

10. Now, at the 11th hour, the Planning Commission without advisory committee review has established a minimum lot size of 1/2 acre. It should also be mentioned that the specific plan EIR has not been prepared on the basis of half acre lots nor has any consideration been given to the impact this decision will have on the ability to create an assessmentdistrict to finance and

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) construct the sorely needed infrastructure improvements. Many of these improvements, it has often been pointed out, are needed even if not one new home is built in the Canyon. Distributing the costoveras manynewhomesas possiblewillfacilitatethebondsaleandreducethe harddollarcost to each of the new homeowners.

Accompanying this letter is a report dated March 10, 1990 in which our firm recommended a number of revisions to the grading standards and overall development criteria. We felt in March and feel now that the proposed grading regulations will result in less creative and more standardized developments than would occur under our proposed revisions.

The underlying rationale behind our proposed grading program is that the individual characteristics of each hillside site are so unique that a case by case evaluationis required to adequatelydetermine the best development concept for the property. The current standards restrict development to those low slopes, under 25% grade. This limitation is a virtual guarantee that any slope below 25% will be developed to the maximum allowable. It also virtually guarantees uniformity of development with the resulting lack of visual variety and housing choices.

RelcoIndustriesis preparedto supportthe CityCouncilin providingcontinuedreviewandcommentin pursuit of a reasonable Reche Canyon Specific Plan. On their behalf, we formally request the following actions:
1 . Remove the minimum lot standard of one-half acre and allow lots down to 7200 SF to be plotted. 2 Adopt a revised set of grading standards based on the Warkentin Wraight "Full featured" analysis program.

3. Establish as a matter of policy that a variety of housing types is appropriate for future development within the canyon.

Should these recommendations be viewed with favor, the granting of a one month continuance during which the City staff, POD/Sasaki and canyon residentsand land ownersmay assessthe impactof the suggestionson the specific plan should be granted.

Relco Industries also petitions the City Council to remove their property in Planning Area 1 from the jurisdiction of the specific plan. There is, we believe, ample justification for such an action based on the circumstances cited earlier in this letter.

Thank you for your consideration of our petition and requests.

Respectfully submitted:

WARKENTIN WRAIGHT
illiam John Warkentin, AIA
artner

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) MARCH 10, 1990

CHAIRPERSON

RECHE CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN COMMITTEE
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIONSAND CHANGESTO THE DRAFTSPECIFICPLAN PROJECT: RECHE CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN, DRAFT DATED DEC. 6, 1989

WARKENTINWRAIGHTISA PLANNINGANDARCHITECTURALFIRMENGAGEDBYA NUMBEROF PROPERTY

OWNERSWITHINTHERECHECANYONSPECIFICPLANAREATOREPRESENTTHEMBEFORETHECOMMITTEE

IN AN EFFORT TO PROVIDE ALTERNATIVEPROCEDURESBASED ON REVISED INFORMATIONAND REFLECTINGA MORE FLEXIBLEAND SITESPECIFIC SET OF DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS.

ATTACHEDTO THIS LETTERREPORTAREBOTHRECOMMENDEDCHANGESTOTHELANGUAGEOFTHE SPECIFIC PLAN AND GRAPHICS THAT ILLUSTRATETHE RESULTS OF OUR ANALYSIS. WE REVIEWED THE

DRAFTTEXT AND HAVE BASED OUR RECOMMENDATIONSON THE POLICIESAND GOALS OF THE GENERAL

PLAN, ACCEPTED PLANNING THEORY AND OUR EXPERIENCE IN PLANNING AND DESIGN OF HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES.

WE ARE CURRENTLYINVOLVEDIN PLANNING/DESIGNPROJECTSIN YOURCITYOF COLTONANDTHE COMMUNITIES OF LOMA LINDA, SAN BERNARDINO AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ADDITIONALLY, OUR

PARTNER FOR PLANNING, WILLIAM JOHN WARKENTIN, AIA WAS THE CO-AUTHOR OF THE CITY OF

IRVINE'S HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONSAND WAS THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE CHINO HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN. OUR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN WORK

INHILLSIDEAREASHASEARNEDSEVERALMAJORDESIGNAWARDSWHICHHASRESULTEDINA GROWING LIST OF HILLSIDE PLANNING AND DESIGN PROJECTS.

OUR EXPERIENCE HAS LEAD US TO SEVERAL CONCLUSIONSABOUT THE PROPER METHOD OF PLANNING

HILLSIDE COMMUNITIES AND BY EXTENSION, OF REGULATING THEIR DEVELOPMENT THROUGH PROPER POLICYAND REGULATORYCONTROLS. TO A MUCHGREATEREXTENTTHAN FLAT LAND PROJECTS, HILLSIDE

DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES VERY THOROUGH AND SITE SPECIFICANALYSIS TO DETERMINETHE CARRYING CAPACITY OF THE LAND AND HENCE, ITS DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL. INDIVIDUAL SITES IN THE

IMMEDIATE PROXIMITY OF ONE ANOTHER MAY HAVE VERY DIFFERENT POTENTIALS DUE TO GREAT

DIFFERENCESINTOPOGRAPHY, SOILS/GEOLOGYCONDITIONS, GROUND OR SUBSURFACEWATER, NATURAL FEATURES, AVAILABILITY OF ACCESS, ETC. THEREFORE, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS SHOULD BE

CAREFULLY DRAFTED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THIS DIVERSITY OF SITE POTENTIALS AND ENCOURAGE BOTH

DETAILED ANALYSIS AND SITE SPECIFIC PLANNING PROPOSALS WHICH CAN BE TAILORED TO THE UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICSOF THE SITE AND STILLMEETTHE OVERALLDEVELOPMENTGOALS OF THE COMMUNITY.

TO SUMMARIZETHE ATTACHEDRECOMMENDATIONSPLEASECONSIDERTHE FOLLOWINGPOINTS:
1 SPECIFIC STANDARDS RELATING DENSITY TO SLOPE SHOULD BE ELIMINATED. 2 FLATLAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR LOT SIZES AND MIN. LOT DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE DROPPED IN FAVOR OF MORE FLEXIBLE REGULATIONS.
3 A " FULL FEATURED ANALYSIS" SHOULD BE REQUIRED UPON WHICH THE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SHOULD BE BASED.

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 4 THIS ANALYSIS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED WITH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND REVIEWED AND APPROVED ALONG WITH THE DESIGN AND PLANNING PROPOSALS. 5 THE VIEWSHEDSFROM RECHECANYONROADANDTHOSE PROMINENTNATURALFEATURESDEEMED

WORTHY OF PRESERVATIONSHOULD BE DETERMINED DURING THE SPECIFIC PLAN PROCESSAND SO PROTECTEDWITH STRINGENTLANDUSECONTROLS.
6 THOSE AREAS NOT TO BE PRESERVEDSHOULDBEALLOWEDTO DEVELOPINA RATIONALAND

APPROPRIATE MANNER, NOT SUBJECTTO SPECIAL CONTROLS BUT BASEDON THE CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROMTHE SITEANALYSIS AND THE SPECIFIC PLAN POLICIESAND STANDARDS.

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION PROVIDES A MORE DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF THOSE PARTICULAR CHARACTERISTICS OF HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENTS THAT REQUIRE DETAILED ANALYSIS. PROPERLY

PREPAREDAND REVIEWED, A FULLFEATUREDANALYSISWILLGENERATETHE TYPEANDAMOUNTOF INFORMATION UPON WHICH THE PLANNING DECISIONS SHOULD BE BASED.

FULL FEATURED ANALYSIS

RESPONSIBLE PLANNINGOF HILLSIDEDEVELOPMENT REQUIRESTHAT EACH SPECIFIC SITE BE EXAMINED THOROUGHLY WITH A " FULL FEATURED ANALYSIS" TO DETERMINE THE CARRYING CAPACITYAND DEVELOPMENTPOTENTIAL OF THE LAND. ADJACENT SITES WILL

OFTEN HAVEVERY DIFFERENTDEVELOPMENTPOTENTIALSDEPENDINGON SOILSIGEOLOGY,

HYDROLOGY, NATURAL FEATURES, BIOTA, VIEWSHED CHARACTERISTICS, MANMADE IMPACTS AND THE CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE ATTACHED TO THE LANDFORMS.

WE RECOMMEND THAT THE RECHE CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN ADOPT THE "FULL FEATURED ANALYSIS" METHOD TO DETERMINE A GIVEN SITE'S DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL. SUCH

ANALYSIS SHOULD BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTICS AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH EACH PRESENTS EITHER CONSTRAINTS OR OPPORTUNITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT.

FURTHER, SITUATIONS THAT ARE NATURALLY UNSAFE SUCH AS UNSTABLE SOILS CAN IN

MANY INSTANCES BE CORRECTED BY THE APPLICATION OF APPROPRIATE MITIGATION MEASURES WHICH SHOULD BE ANALYZED WITH EQUAL CONSIDERATION.

GEOMORPHIC ANALYSIS

THE OVERALL RISE AND FALL OF THE LAND, THE SEVERITY OF THE SLOPES THAT DEFINE

THE HILLSIDES AND THE GENERAL SHAPE AND FORM OF THE LAND ALL COMPRISE THE GEOMORPHIC STATUS OF THE SITE. CLEARLY THE SLOPE CONDITIONS HAVE MOST TO DO

WITH THE VISUAL PERCEPTION OF THE LAND FORM BUT THIS VISUAL IDENTITY HAS LITTLE TO DO WITH THE REAL CARRYING CAPACITY OF THE LAND ITSELF. SLOPE CONDITIONS AND

LAND FORMS ARE STRONG DETERMINANTS OF DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ONLY WHEN

SUPPORTED BY COMPLEMENTARY PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CLEARLY DEFINED CULTURAL VALUES.

IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE IN THIS REGARD THAT STEEPNESS OF SLOPE AND VIABLE DENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT HAVE ONLY A LIMITED DIRECT RELATIONSHIP. SLOPEIDENSITY

FORMULAS ARE VALID ONLY WHEN APPLIED AFTER A FULL FEATURED ANALYSIS HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND AND THE RESULTS SUPPORT A REDUCED DENSITY AS SLOPES INCREASE.

IT IS OFTEN ASSUMED THAT AS SLOPE INCREASES ACCESS IS AUTOMATICALLY MORE

RESTRICTED, SOILS ARE MORE UNSTABLE, DRAINAGE IS A GREATER PROBLEM, VIEWSHEDS

ARE NATURALLY MORE VALUABLE, NATURAL FEATURES ARE MORE EXTENSIVE AND

DESERVE GREATER PRESERVATIONAND THE MANMADE IMPACTS AREAUTOMATICALLYLESS DESIRABLE AND CREATE GREATER CONSTRAINTS FOR DEVELOPMENT. THE ABOVE SHOULD

NOT BE ASSUMPTIONS BUT RATHER CONCLUSIONS ARRIVED AT AFTER A RATIONAL AND FULL FEATURED ANALYSIS.)

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

CIRCULATION, ACCESS AND EGRESS

IN HILLSIDEPLANNINGTHEDEGREETOWHICHACCESSANDEGRESSAREAVAILABLEARE

PRIME DETERMINANTSOF DEVELOPMENTPOTENTIAL FIRE AND SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS

ARE PARAMOUNT IN THE DESIGN OF LOCAL STREET SYSTEMS WITH THE LOCAL FIRE

MARSHALL DICTATING ROAD WIDTHS, TURNING RADII, CUL-DE-SAC LENGTHS, PLACEMENT OF HYDRANTS, ETC. SEVERLYLIMITEDACCESSWOULDDICTATEREDUCEDCARRYING

CAPACITY JUST AS AMPLE ACCESS WOULD INDICATE MAXIMUM POTENTIAL

IT SHOULD BE NOTEDTHAT REDUCEDGRADING IS POSSIBLE ONLY WHEN STREET GRADES

ARE SUFFICIENTLY STEEP, TURNING RADII ARE MINIMUMS NOT MAXIMUMS AND STREET WIDTHS ARE REDUCED. MANDATING FLAT LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN HILLSIDE

AREAS IS DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED TO THE POLICIES OF REDUCED GRADING AND RETENTION OF OPEN SPACE.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS

SOILS CONDITIONS AND THE NATURE OF THE UNDERLYING GEOLOGY ARE CRITICAL IN THE DESIGN AND PLANNING OF HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENTS. SLOPE STABILITY AND SEISMIC

ACTIVITY DETERMINETHE LOCATIONOF DEVELOPMENT, THE NATURE OF THE STRUCTURAL

SYSTEMS UTILIZED IN ARCHITECTURAL AND CIVIL STRUCTURES, GRADING DESIGN,

LANDSCAPE OPPORTUNITIES AND THE DEGREE TO WHICH IRRIGATION MUST BE CONTROLLED AND MONITORED.

DRAINAGE AND HYDROLOGY

SURFACE WATER IS CLEARLY A MAJOR CONSTRAINT TO DEVELOPMENT AND IS USUALLY HELD TO BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN ITS DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL. STREAMS, LAKES,

RIVERS AND PONDS ARE NORMALLY RESPECTED AND ANY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS SETBACK FROM THE WATER' S EDGE. FLOOD PLAINS MUST CLEARLY BE AVOIDED OR

STRUCTURESDESIGNEDSO AS TO PROTECTLIFEAND PROPERTYDURINGTHE DESIGNYEAR FLOOD CONDITIONS. SUBSURFACE WATER MUST BE LOCATED AND AVOIDED OR CONTROLLED IN TERMS OF BUILDING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLACEMENT. SUBSURFACE

WATER MUST BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED IN TERMS OF THE LOCAL SOILS CONDITIONS TO

AVOID DEVELOPINGINAREASSUBJECTTO SOIL SLIPPAGEOVER ADVERSE BEDDINGPLANES OR STRATA. IN AREAS WHERE DE -WATERING OF THE SLOPE CAN BE SAFELY

ACCOMPLISHED, DEVELOPMENT CAN TAKE PLACE AFTER THE RECOMMENDED MEASURES HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED.

VIEWS AND VIEWSHED ANALYSIS

DEVELOPMENT OF HILLSIDE AREAS IS OFTEN BASED ON THE DESIRE FOR THE

EXTRAORDINARY VIEWS PROVIDED BY THE ELEVATED VANTAGE POINT OFFERED BY HILLSIDE CONSTRUCTION. APPROPRIATE HILLSIDE DESIGN ATTEMPTS TO MAXIMIZE THE

OFF- SITE VIEW OPPORTUNITIES AND PROVIDES THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF HOMES WITH WHATEVER VIEWS ARE POSSIBLE. EQUALLY IMPORTANT IS THE CAREFUL CONSIDERATION

OF THE VIEWSHED CREATED BY THE SLOPE FACE OF THE HILLSIDES AS SEEN FROM VANTAGE POINTS OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA.

NATURAL FEATURES

THE OCCURANCE OF NATURAL FEATURES CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT BY THE LOCAL

COMMUNITY SHOULD ESTABLISH A CULTURAL BASELINE FOR PLANNING DECISIONS ABOUT

THE DEVELOPMENT OF RIDGELINES, KNOLLS, ROCK OUTCROPPINGS, TREE STANDS, RIVERS, STREAMS, LAKES, ETC. TWO CONSIDERATIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED WITH

REGARD TO DEVELOPMENT OF AREAS DETERMINED TO CONTAIN SIGNIFICANT NATURAL FEATURES. ONE, THE EXTENT TO WHICH A NATURAL FEATURE IS GIVEN PROTECTION FROM

DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE BASED ON ITS SPECIFIC SIGNIFICANCE TO THE COMMUNITY AND

TWO, NATURAL FEATURES MAY BE PRESERVED EITHER AS INDIVIDUAL AND UNIQUE

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) ENTITIESIN THELANDSCAPEORAS A PROTECTEDCLASSOF FEATURES. IN THE FIRST

INSTANCE, DETERMINATIONOFTHEFEATURE'S SIGNIFICANCEWILL LEADTO DECISIONS

ABOUTTHE LEVELOF DEVELOPMENTTO BE ALLOWED, FROMMODERATETO SEVERLY LIMITEDTOCOMPLETELYPROHIBITED. INTHESECONDINSTANCE, ANASSESSMENTMUST BE MADEOFTHE IMPORTANCEOFTHEFEATUREASAN INDIVIDUAL "LANDMARK" VS. ITS IMPORTANCEAS A MEMBEROF A CLASSOF FEATURESDEEMEDWORTHY OF PRESERVATION.

MANMADE IMPACTS

MANMADE IMPACTSCAN HAVE SUBSTANTIALCONSEQUENCES INTERMS OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING. THE RECHE CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN AREA IS SUBJECT TO THREE SIGNIFICANT MANMADEIMPACTS. FIRSTISTHE LOCATIONAND CAPACITYOF THE STREETSYSTEM.

SECONDISTHEEXISTANCEOFSEVERALMAJORUTILITYINFRASTRUCTURESINCLUDINGTHE DRAINAGECANALANDTHE EDISONPOWERTRANSMISSIONLINEEASEMENT. THIRDISTHE EXISTINGDEVELOPMENTANDTHATWHICHISAPPROVEDBUTUNBUILT. EACHOFTHESE IMPACTSINFLUENCESTHE CURRENTLYUNDEVELOPEDAREA TO SOME DEGREE. IN PARTICULAR, THE 500' WIDE EDISON EASEMENT INSTANTLY CREATES AN OPEN SPACE ELEMENT THAT STRETCHES FROM COLTON TO REDLANDS AND BEYOND.

FROMTHE ABOVE DISCUSSION, WE HOPE IT IS CLEARTHAT THE DIVERSITYOF CONDITIONSTHAT

PREVAILSUPONTHEOVERALLSPECIFICPLANAREAWARRENTSA MOREGENERALSETOFPOLICIESINTHE SPECIFICPLANANDA MOREPRECISESETOFCONTROLSATTHESITEPLANREVIEWSTAGE. WEHOPEITIS

EQUALLYCLEARTHATTHECOMMUNITYWILLDERIVEBETTERMASTERPLANNEDPROJECTS, EACHSUITED

TO ITSENVIRONMENTANDBASEDONA THOROUGHUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEUNDERLYINGLAND'S REAL

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL

WE LOOKFORWARDTO ENGAGINGINA DIALOGWITHTHECOMMITTEEANDSTAFFABOUTTHEISSUESWE

HAVE RAISED AND SINCERELY HOPE AND EXPECTOUR EFFORTSWILL RESULT IN AN IMPROVED SPECIFIC PLAN THAT WILL IN TURN RESULT IN IMPROVEDAND VERY HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENTS.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

WILLIAM JOHN WARKENTIN, AIA

PARTNER

WARKENTIN WRAIGHT

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) W A R K E N T I N W R A l G H T

COMMENTSANDRECOMMENDEDCHANGESTOTHEDRAFTTEXTOFTHERECHECANYONSPECIFICPLAN DATEDDEC. 6, 1989. PREPAREDBYWARKENTINWRAIGHT, ARCHITECTSANDPLANNERS.

Ra 7 2. 2. 2 ,,% j THE COMMENT REGARDING SLOPE FAILURE AFTER GRADING IS POTENTIALLY MISLEADING. BASED ON THE SOILS REPORT PREPARED FOR

CRESTA LINDA, THE MOST LIKELYCANDIDATE FOR SLOPE PROBLEMS AFTER

GRADING ARE VERY LARGE LOTS DEVELOPMENTS WHEREIN REMEDIAL

GRADING TO CURE EXISTINGAND POTENTIAL LANDSLIDES WAS HELD TO AN UNSAFE MINIMUM. IN MUCH OF THE PLATEAU AND UPLAND AREA TO THE

EAST OF RECHE CANYON ROAD UNSTABLE SOILS (LANDSLIDES) ARE MOST

EASILY CURED WITH EXTENSIVE REMEDIAL GRADING SPECIFICALLY

DESIGNED BY ENGINEERING GEOLOGISTS WITH DUE REGARD FOR SOILS TYPE, DEPTH AND UNDERLYING GEOLOGY. ADDITIONAL SLOPE

STABILIZATION METHODS ARE AVAILABLE AND ARE RECOMMENDED BY

GEOLOGISTS WHEN APPROPRIATE TO THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.

CHANGE AS FOLLOWS:

REMOVE THE ENTIRE THIRD PARAGRAPH FROM THE BOTTOM OF
THE PAGE BEGINNING WITH " WITH THE EXCEPTION......."
PG 13 2. 3. 2 WILDLIFE
ADD THE FOLLOWING:

IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAND WILL

CORRECT NOT ONLY THE EROSION THAT CURRENTLY OCCURS

UNCHECKED BUT WILL ALSO IMPROVE THE EXTENT AND QUALITY
OF LANDSCAPING WHILE STABLIZING THE MANY LANDSLIDES.

PG 21 2. 9 VIEWS AND VISUAL QUALITY
ADD THE FOLLOWING:

THE VISUAL IDENTITY OF RECHE CANYON IS PRIMARILY

DEPENDENT ON THE HORIZON RIDGELINES SEEN FROM THE
CANYON BOTTOM, I. E., RECHE CANYON ROAD, AND BY THE SLOPE FACE VIEWSHEDS THAT LEAD UP TO THESE RIDGELINES. THESE

ARE THE PRIMARY VISUAL RESOURCES THAT SHOULD RECEIVE

EXTRAORDINARY CARE IN BOTH THE EXTENT AND TYPE OF
DEVELOPMENT PERMITTED WITHIN THEIR BOUNDARIES.

FG 27 2. 1 1 . 6 SLOPE STABILITY AND SOILS THE COMMENTS ABOVE APPLY TO THIS SECTION AS WELL. LACKING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE ASSURTION THAT " MOST DEVELOPMENT SHOULD OCCUR IN THE VALLEYS WITH NO DEVELOPMENT OR VERY LARGE LOT DEVELOPMENT ON HILLSIDES"

IT WOULD APPEAR THE ASSURTION IS UNFOUNDED, PARTICULARLY WHEN APPLIED TO THE ENTIRE 3000 ACRES OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. IT

SHOULD ALSO BE POINTED OUT THAT IT IS IN THE VALLEYS THAT MOST OF

THE DAMAGE FROM LANDSLIDES WOULD OCCUR, PARTICULARLY IN WET YEARS. WHILE THERE APPEARS TO BE LITTLE OR NO " BEDROCK" EAST OF

RECHE CANYON AND QUITE POSSIBLY NONE BEYOND THE IMMEDIATE SLOPES

OF BLUE MOUNTAIN TO THE WEST, THERE IS A SANDSTONE BASE UNDER THE

TOPSOIL THAT IS CLOSE TO THE RIDGETOPS AND CAN BE EASILY RIPPED TO PROVIDE SECURE BUILDING PADS.

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) PG 28 ADD THE FOLLOWING:

2. 11 . 8 SITE SPECIFIC PLANNING PROCESS

THE SPECIFIC PLAN IS AN APPROPRIATE PLANNING TOOL WHEN

APPLIED IN THE CONTEXT OF CREATING OVERALL POLICIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RECHE CANYON AREA. THE DIVERSITY

OF THE LAND FORMS, THE VARIED OWNERSHIP INTERESTS, THE

RANGE OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TYPES AND THE SITE

SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS OF EACH PARCEL ALL COMBINE TO

ARGUE FOR A TWO TIERED APPROVAL PROCESS INVOLVING

GENERAL POLICIES AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS IN THE

SPECIFIC PLAN FOLLOWED BY A DETAILED AND FULL FEATURED
ANALYSIS DURING THE SITE PLAN REVIEW PHASE.

THE SPECIFIC PLAN WILL SET FORTH THE MAXIMUM DENSITY

AND INTENSITY OF USES FOR EACH LAND USE CATAGORY AND

SPECIFY THE APPROPRIATE MINIMUM OR MAXIMUM STANDARDS
TO WHICH THE DEVELOPMENT MUST ADHERE. IN ORDER TO

MEET THE PLAN' S POLICY OF MAXIMUM OPEN SPACE AND

MINIMUM GRADING, FLEXIBILITY WILL BE ALLOWED AND

CREATIVITY ENCOURAGED IN THE CLUSTERING OF HOMES AND IN

THE STANDARDS REGARDING LOT SIZE, MINIMUM LOT

DIMENSIONS AND IN THE TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL PRODUCTS
CONSIDERED APPROPRIATE WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN.

PG 29 OBJECTIVES 3
SUBSTITUTE AS FOLLOWS:

ESTABLISH A PROMINANT FEATURES MAP WHICH IDENTIFIES

THOSE RIDGELINES, KNOLLS AND OTHER MAJOR NATURAL
FEATURES DEEMED WORTHY OF PRESERVATION. ESTABLISH

VARIOUS LEVELS OF DEVELOPMENT AND ASSIGN AN APPRO-
PRIATE LEVEL TO EACH TYPE OF FEATURE TO BE PRESERVED.

FG 37- 41 4. 3 PERMITTED LAND USE CATAGORIES
Fr 53- 70 5. 1- 5. 7 LAND USE STANDARDS

THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PERMITTED LAND USE CATAGORIES AND THE

MORE SPECIFIC LAND USE STANDARDS CONTAIN REPEATED REFERENCES TO DENSITY OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT KEYED TO PERCENT OF SLOPE. A

FULL FEATURED ANALYSIS ON A SITE SPECIFIC BASIS WHICH INCLUDES

THOSE NATURAL FEATURES TO BE PRESERVED AND ACKNOWLEDGES THOSE

MANMADE IMPACTS WHICH EFFECT THE SITE WILL YIELD BOTH A PHYSICAL

PLANNING SOLUTION TO THE CONSTRAINTS OF THE SITE AND A DENSITY THAT IS BASED ON THE CARRYING CAPACITY OF THE LAND.

WE RECOMMEND THAT ALL REFERENCES TO SLOPE/ DENSITY BE REMOVED

FROM THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND THAT PERFORMANCE BASED STANDARDS BE UTILIZED IN THEIR PLACE.

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) E&
SUBSTITUTEAND/ORINSERTINTHEAPPROPRIATEPLACES:

A THE RANGE OF DENSITIESALLOWED IN EACH LAND USE

CATEGORY SHOULD ESTABLISH A MAXIMUM LEVEL OF
DEVELOPMENT THAT CANNOT BE EXCEEDED. THE SPECIFIC

DENSITY PROPOSED FOR AN INDIVIDUAL SITE MUST BE

VALIDATED BY THE SITE ANALYSIS AND MUST FURTHER COMPLY

WITH THE OTHER STANDARDSAND GUIDELINES CONTAINEDIN
THIS SPECIFIC PLAN.
f3 THE FOLLOWING DENSTTY

ADOPTED FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL

OPEN SPACE

RURAL DENSITY

ESTATE DENSITY

LOW DENSITY

INTERMEDIATE DENSITY

HIGH DENSITY

DESIGNATIONS SHOULD BE
LAND USE CATEGORY:

MAX. 1 DU/ 10 AC
MAX. 1 DU/ AC
MAX. 2DU/ AC
MAX. 4DU/ AC
MAX. 10DU/ AC
MAX. 15DU/ AC

C MINIMUM LOT SIZE AND DIMENSIONS ARE DIRECTLY

APPLICABLE TO FLAT LAND DEVELOPMENT BUT OFTEN BECOME

INHIBITIONS TO CLUSTERING OR DEVELOPMENT OF APPROPRIATE ATTACHED UNITS IN HILLSIDE AREAS. THE ABILITY TO

PRESERVE OPEN SPACE IS GENERALLY A FUNCTION OF

GENERATING MAXIMUM DENSITIES AND CLUSTERING THAT

DENSITY IN AREAS SUITABLE FOR MORE INTENSIVE
DEVELOPMENT. SUCH CLUSTERING MANDATES FLEXIBILITY IN
LOT SIZE AND MINIMUM DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS.
73 5. 12. 1 ADD IN THE APPROPRIATE PLACE:

SITE PLANS

THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR SITE

SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ANALYSES

PLAN REVIEW

AND A BRIEF

NARRATIVE DISCUSSION OF THE BASIS FOR THE PLANNING
APPROACH AND ITS VALIDATION BY THE SITE ANALYSIS.

A GEOMORPHIC CONDITIONS

B CIRCULATION

C SOILS AND GEOLOGY

D DRAINAGE AND HYDROLOGY

E VIEWS AND VIEWSHEDS

F NATURAL FEATURES EVALUATION

G MANMADE IMPACTS

THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVIEWED AND

EVALUATED IN TERMS OF THE SITE ANALYSIS AND WHEN

DETERMINED TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONCLUSIONS

OF THE ANALYSIS AND WITH THE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
OF THIS SPECIFIC PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED.

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Ra 76- 85 6. 1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE STANDARDS

THE DISCUSSIONMAKES TWO RATHER FUNDAMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS THAT BEAR CRITICAL REVIEW. ONE, THAT HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS ARE THE

RESULT OF GRADING OPERATIONS AND TWO, THAT THE NATURAL
CHARACTER OF THE AREA IS UNIFORMLY WORTHY OF PRESERVATION.

AS TO THE FIRSTASSUMPTION, PLEASE REFER TO THE PREVIOUS GENERAL DISCUSSIONS ABOUT SLOPE STABILITY AND SOILS. ADDITIONALLY, IT

SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE NATURE OF THE SOILS CONDITIONS TO THE EAST OF RECHE CANYON ROAD ARE GENERALLY UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED.

ENGINEERINGGEOLOGISTSHAVE MAPPED200 EXISTINGLANDSLIDESON THE

CRESTA LINDAPROPERTYTHAT RANGE FROM SMALL SURFACE FAILURESTO FAIRLY LARGE "BEDROCK" FAILURES. THE EXTENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF

THESE LANDSLIDES IS SUCH THAT ANY DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE WILL

REQUIRE BOTH DEVELOPMENT GRADING AND REMEDIAL GRADING TO ELIMINATE THE DANGEROUS CONDITIONS CREATED BY THE FAILURES.

ON ANYTHING MORE THAN AN INDIVIDUAL LOT BY LOT BASIS, THE

PREFERREDMETHODOF CORRECTINGSUCH FAILURESISOVER -EXCAVATION

AND REPLACEMENTOF THE FAILED SOIL WITH ENGINEERED FILL CERTIFIED BY THE GEOLOGIST OF RECORD.

AS TO THE SECONDASSUMPTION, THE GENERAL CHARACTER OF THE LAND

EAST OF RECHE CANYON IS AN UPLAND PLATEAU HIGHLY ERODED INTO

STEEP SIDED GULLIES AND WASHES WITH AN OCCASSIONAL WIDER VALLEY ONTO WHICH NUMEROUS NARROW SIDE CANYONS OPEN. THE ENTIRE AREA

IS CRISSCROSSED WITH DIRT BIKE TRAILS WHICH HAVE SERVED TO

INCREASETHE EROSION OF THETOPSOIL THE RIDGELINESARE OFTENVERY NARROWAND HAVEA SHALLOW COVER OF TOPSOILOF AS LITTLEAS 3. THE

VALLEY FLOORS ARE TYPICALLY WIDER RESULTING FROM EROSION AND THE SOIL COVER MAY BE UP TO 50' DEEP.

WEST OF RECHE CANYON THE LAND IN THE CANYON BOTTOM IS LARGELY

DEVELOPED (MUCH MORE SO THAN TO THE EAST) AND HAS CLIMBED UP THE

SLOPESOF BLUEMOUNTAIN ALONG RECHECANYONAND BARTON ROADSTO THE GRAND TERRACE CITY LIMITS. LACKING DIFINITIVE SOILS DATA FOR

THE AREAS WEST OF RECHE CANYON, WE CAN ONLY ASSUME THAT THE CONDITIONS PREVAILING TO THE EAST ALSO OCCUR TO THE WEST. SITE

SPECIFICREPORTSWILL DETERMINETHE EXACT NATURE OF THE SOILSAND

OFFERAPPROPRIATERECOMMENDATIONSFORGRADINGAND CORRECTIONOF SOIL INSTABILITIES.

THE CONCLUSIONTO BE DRAWN FROMTHIS INFORMATIONISTHAT MUCH OF

THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA WILL REQUIRE REMEDIAL GRADING TO ALLOW ANY

DEVELOPMENT AND THAT DEVELOPMENT ITSELF WILL IN MANY INSTANCES SOLVE THE SOILS PROBLEMS. THE SECOND CONCLUSION IS THAT EAST OF

RECHE CANYON THERE IS REALLY VERY LITTLE IN THE WAY OF SCENIC OR

NATURAL FEATURES TO BE PRESERVED BEYOND THE SLOPE FACES AND RIDGEUNES THAT DEFINE THE BOUNDARIES OF RECHE CANYON ITSELF.

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) PG 77 NATURAL FEATURES
SUBSTITUTE THE FOLLOWING:

PROMINANT FEATURES TO BE PRESERVED AS WELL AS THOSE

THAT ARE PRIME DETERMINANTS OF DESIGN SHALL BE THOSE
FOUND ON THE " PROMINENT FEATURES MAP". PROMINENT

FEATURES INCLUDE BOTH NATURAL AND MANMADE COMPONENTS

OF THE LANDSCAPE AND SHALL BE TREATED ACCORDING TO THE
FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

NATURAL FEATURES
A PROMINENT RIDGELINES: THOSE RIDGELINES THAT

DEFINE THE EDGES OF RECHE CANYON ITSELF AND CREATE THE
HORIZON WHEN VIEWED FROM THE CANYON FLOOR.

LAND USE CRITERIA: RURAL DENSITY STANDARDS
BBLUE MOUNTAIN: THOSE PORTIONS OF BLUE MOUNTAIN

ABOVE ELEVATION I IAS DESIGNATEDON THE MAP WHICH

DEFINE THE STEEPER SLOPES AND THOSE AREAS UPHILL FROM

THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WHICH CURRENTLY SURROUNDS
MUCH OF THE MOUNTAIN.

LAND USE CRITERIA: NO DEVELOPMENT ALLOWED
C VIEWSHEDS: VIEWSHEDS ARE THOSE SLOPE FACES

VISABLE FROM THE FLOOR OF RECHE CANYON WHICH EXTEND UP

TO THE HORIZON RIDGELINE AND WHICH VISUALLY DEFINE THE
WALLS" OF THE CANYON.

LAND USE CRITERIA: ESTATE DENSITY STANDARDS

MANMADE FEATURES
D THE EDISON EASEMENT: THE 500' WIDE SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA EDISON POWER TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT IS

THE SINGLE STRONGEST INFLUENCE ON DESIGN AND PLANNING

DECISIONS FOR THE SITES BEYOND THE IMMEDIATE RECHE
CANYON AREA. SINCE NO DEVELOPMENT OTHER THAN GRADED

OPEN SPACE IS BASICALLY PERMITTED, THE EASEMENT
BECOMES A 500' WIDE OPEN SPACE CORRIDOR LINKING COLTON

WITH REDLANDS AND PROVIDES TRAILS, HABITAT AND A SUPERB NATURAL RESOURCE AVAILABLE TO LOCAL RESIDENTS. WHERE

THE EASEMENT SITS ATOP A RIDGELINE THAT RIDGELINE

AUTOMATICALLY BECOMES A FEATURE TO BE PRESERVED EVEN
IF THE RIDGELINE IS NOT PARTICULARLY PROMINENT.

LAND USE CRITERIA: MAY BE DEVELOPED AS OPEN SPACE ONLY.

E UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURES: THESE ARE DEFINED AS

STREETS, CANALS AND UTILITY INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE

EITHER PHYSICAL PRESENCES IN THE LANDSCAPE OR BECAUSE

OF THEIR ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DICTATE

SPECIFIC PLANNING RESPONCES THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED OR
MITIGATED.

LAND USE CRITERIA: NOT APPLICABLE

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) F EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS: THE EXISTING AND

APPROVED BUT UNBUILT DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE SPECIFIC
PLAN AREA CREATE A STRONG CONTEXT OF " SUBURBAN"

GROWTH, PARTICULARLY ALONG THE CANYON BOTTOM AND UP
THE WESTERN SLOPES OF BLUE MOUNTAIN. THE CURRENTLY
DEVELOPING AREAS OF PRADO LANE ARE TYPICAL 4 TO 5 DU/AC

NEIGHBORHOODS AND THE PATTERN WILL CONTINUE UP TO THE
LOMA LINDA CITY LIMITS. ( CRESTA LINDA IS A 480 ACRE SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNED AT A GROSS DENSITY OF 2 DU/AC BUT WITH ALMOST 50 OF THE AREA RESERVED FOR OPEN SPACE. THE RESULT IS A MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY OF MINIMUM 7200 S. F. LOTS WITH DEVELOPMENT CLUSTERED INTONEIGHBORHOOD ENCLAVES AT NET DENSITIES OF 4 TO5 DU/ AC.)
LAND USE CRITERIA: NOT APPLICABLE
PG 77 MINIMIZE GRADING
SUBSTITUTE THE FOLLOWING:

GRADING IN UNDEVELOPED PORTIONS OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN

AREA SHALL BE LIMITED TO THAT REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TO CORRECT ANY UNSTABLE

SOILS CONDITIONS THAT CURRENTLY IMPACT THE SITE OR COULD IMPACT THE SITE IF NOT CORRECTED.

FG 78 REMEDIAL GRADING
SUBSTITUTE THE FOLLOWING:

REMEDIAL GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE EXTENT

REQUIRED BY THE GEOLOGIST OF RECORD AND SHALL INCLUDE

ALL AREAS SUBJECT TO FAILURE OR MOVEMENT BOTH

IDENTIFIED AS ACTIVELY UNSTABLE AS WELL AS THOSE AREAS

IDENTIFIED AS POTENTIALLY UNSTABLE AND SO LOCATED AS TO

POSE A FUTURE THREAT TO THE LIFE AND SAFETY OF THE
RESIDENTS.

FG 84 GRADING ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 25% GRADE
SUBSTITUTE THE FOLLOWING:

GRADING ON NATURALLY OCCURING SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25%

WITHIN AREAS DESIGNATED AS PROMINENT RIDGELINES OR

VIEWSHEDS SHALL BE LIMITED TO REMEDIAL GRADING OR

GRADING REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF STREETS AND
UTILITY INSTALLATIONS. THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE

PREPARED AND APPROVED BY THE GEOLOGIST OF RECORD AND
SHALL INCLUDE A DETAILED SLOPE STABILIZATION PLAN. SUCH

PLAN MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A
GRADING PERMIT.

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) DEC 04 ' 90 04: 23PM REZPIIK & REZNIK
BENJAMIN M. RG: NIK

JAN' CE KAMENIR- REZNIK

PENNY GROSZ- SALOMON
ALAN J_ KHEEL
JOHN M. BOWMAN
PACO N. GAINES

VIVIANA M, SZTRIGLER

BARBARA ULLMAN SCMWERIN
MA77HEW H, TAMBQR
TIMOTH R. HANIGAN
ARTMUA CARVALHO. JR.

REzxix & R. EzNYK
A LAW CQR13QRATIQK
IS4S45 VENTUAA OOULCVARC, FIFTH FLOOR
SHER24AN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403- 3002
BIB) 907- 9004
ala) s> a-: goo
December 4, 1990

ORIGINAL SENT BY MAIL
VIA FAX NO. ( 71.4) 3705154
Stephen W. Edwards, Esa,.

City Attorney
City of Colton
650 North LaCadena Drive
Colton, California 92324
RE: Relco Industries
Tentative Tract Map 14830,
Reference No. D33- 90
Reche Canyon Specific Pian
Dear Mr. Edwards:

P. 2/ 3

FACSIMILE
4910) 907- 646S
REFER TO FILE NUMBER:
1024. 03
ThislawfirmrepresentsRelcoIndustrieswithregardto theabove -referencedTentative 'TractMap application. It hascometo our attentionthat after two yearsof cooperationwith the City by Relco Industries with regard to the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, the latest version of the Specific Plan fails to accommodatethe lot sizeprovidedfor in Relco's Tract Map application. Since December, 1988, andat theCity'srequest, RelcoIndustrieshasparticipatedandcontributedto the developmentof the RecheCanyonSpecificPlannowset for hearingbeforethe ColtonCity Council tonight, December 4, 1990. Also at the City's request, Relcoheldoff in the filing of the above -referencedTract Map in aneffort againto cooperatewith the City's SpecificPlanprocess.

It isonlywithinthe lastfewdaysthattheSpecificPlanhasbeensubstantivelyalteredrendering Relco's Tract Map inconsistent and with the potential to causemillions of dollars of damage to Relcobasedon lossof buildingentitlements.

In the City's recenthasteto adopttheSpecificPlan, a numberof importantstatutoryanddue process requirements have not been met. We do not believe the Environmental Impact Report preparedfor the SpecificPlanhasbeenproperlynoticedandcirculatedasrequiredby Public Resources Code §§ 21000et. Igg. The EIR failsto includeanysubstantialinformationto support the recent changes in lot size requirements. In addition, the manner in which those changes were adoptedbytheCityPlanningCommissiondid notprovidefor adequatenoticeor opportunityfor hearing. As a result, serious constitutional and state law due process violations have occurred.

J1wp54WataVng\re1oo11024Wa,3c

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) DEC 04 ' 90 04: 24Ph1 REZHIK & REZNIK
StephenW. Edwards, Esq.

December 4, 1990

P. 3! 3
Specificallywithregardto theabove -referencedTractMap, pursuant to Government Code § f 65920et. M. andtheundisputedhistoryofRelco'scooperationwiththeCity'srequesttodelaytheTractMapapplication, suchTractMapmustbenowdeemedapproved.

FortheCitytomoveforwardasit haswithoutprovidingadequatetimeforRelcoto reactto the massivechangesin theSpecificPlanrecommendedbythePlanningCommissioniscompletely unreasonable.

Relco's requestat thistime is simplythatthe matterbe continuedin orderto provideadditionaltimeforRelcotocommenttotheCityCouncilandfortheCityto insurethat all properplanningandenvironmentalclearanceprocedureshavebeenfollowed. In the alternative, Relco'stractshouldberemovedfromtheSpecificflanandreviewedspearatelyonitsownmerits.

I wouldbehappyto meetwithyouatyourearliestconvenienceto discussthismatterfurther.

Pleasedonothesitatetocontactmewithanyquestionsorcommentsyoumayhave.

FNG: Itsl
A- p5Watalfnglrelco\ 102Q3c2=
Very truly yours,

REZNIK & REZNIK
A Law Corporation
13y
FREDLO

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Proof Of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

SS
County of San Bernardino
I declareunder penalty of perjury that:

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the ageof eighteen years, and not a party to nor interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the Colton Courier, a news- paper published in the City of Colton, State of California, County of San Bernardino and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all the times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the City of Colton, State of California, County of San Bernardino, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and which newspaper is not devoted to nor published for the interests, entertainment or instruction of a particular class, profession, trade, calling, race, or denomination, or any number of the same; that the notice, or which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit:

NOVEMBER 22, 1990
I certify (or delcare) under penaltyof perjury that the fore- going is true and correct.

Signature
Dated this 22nd day of November, 1990.

Colton Courier
333E. Valley Blvd. • P. O. Box 906
Colton, CA 92324
714/ 825- 1145

NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIVEN that the City
Council of the City of
Colton will hold a Public
Hearing, in the Council
Chambersof City Hall,
650 North La Cadena
Drive, ; at 7:30 p. m
Tuesday, DECEMBER4,
1990, on the following.

File Index Number:

D- 60- 90
cant

CITY OF COLTON
ftuest

RECHE CANYON

SPECIFIC PLAN
Location:

AREA ALONG AND

SURROUNDING RECHE

CANYON ROAD,

NORTH AT

WASHINGTON' STREET

TQSOUTH AT

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LINE.

Any personmayappearin
personor by agentandbe
heard. .

Petitions signed by inter-
estedipersoilamay be filed
with the City Clerk, City
Hall, prior' to, the
hearing.
s) HELEN A., RAMOS,
CMC
City Clerk
City of Colton
Published Colton Courier
November 22, 1990.

C- 5733

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Proof of Publication

CITY OF COLTON
FINANCE DEPT.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, } ss.

County of San Bernardino,
The undersignedhereby certifies asfollows:

I am a citizen of the United States, over the ageof twenty-one years, and not party to nor interested in the above - entitled matter; I am the principal clerk of th printer of a newspaper, to wit, The Sun; the same was at all times herein mentioned newspaperof generalcirculation printed and publisheddaily, including Sunday, in th City of San Bernardino, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; sai newspaper is so published every day of the year as and under the name of The Sun, sai newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superie Court of theStateof California, in andfor theCountyof SanBernardino, by ajudl ment of said Superior Court duly made, filed and entered on June 20, 1952, in th recordsandfilesof saidSuperiorCourtin thatcertainproceedingentitledIn theMal ter of the Ascertainment and Establishment of The Sun as a Newspaper of General Cil culation, numbered 73084 in the records of civil proceedings in said Superior Coul andbyjudgmentmodifyingthesame, alsomade, filed andenteredin saidproceedinE the notice or other process or document hereinafter mentioned was set, printed an published in type not smaller than nonpareil and was preceded with words printed in blackfacetypenotsmallerthannonpareildescribingandexpressingin generalterms the purport or character of the notice intended to be given; and the Speoe below lar Hlkq Ramp oft

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
D- 60- 90
of which the annexed is a true printed copy, was published in each edition and issue of said newspaper of general circulation, and not in any supplement thereof, on each of the following dates, to wit:

NOVEMBER 24, 1990
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on the ....?$.... day of . ,
NOVEMBER 19 90 , at
SanBernardino, in said County and State.
0502/ 4/ 81
00 NA
NO. 3

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Colton will hold a Public Hearing in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 650 North La Cadena Drive, at 7: 30 p. m., Tuesday, December 4, 1990, on the following:
heard.

FILE INDEX NO. D- 60- 90
APPLICANT: City of Colton
REQUEST: Reche Canyon Specific Plan
LOCATION: Area along and surrounding
Reche Canyon Road, north at
Washington Street to south
at Riverside County Line.

Any interested person may appear in person or by agent and be Petitions signed by interested persons may be filed with the City Clerk, City Hall, prior to the hearing.

HELEN A. RAMOS, CMC
City Clerk
City of Colton
PUBLISH: Colton Courier
Thursday, November 22, 1990

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: HONORABLE MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL Q
FOR: Council Meeting of 20 November 1890
FROM: JaimeR. Aguilera, Directorof CommunityDevelopment By RobertD. Dalquest, AssistantPlanner2 . 1
SUBJECT: Adoption of the Roche Canyon Specific Plan
RECOMMENIZOTION:

Staffrecommendsfor PublicHearingtheRecheCarryonSpecificPlanforthemeeting of December 4, 1890.

CITY MANAGER' S CONCURREN

CITY OF COLTON

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

PLANNING DIVISION
I
E
I
0 T

1.1.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Attachment 1_12-4-1990_Reche Canyon SP Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

ATTACHMENT 2

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) NG RA. t 41fOR anc 1TY CO JNCIL
c utl; Ri r e tif c 1 i 1 r i 1
aim R. ii r, direct r of mr z: nit Devef pr e`'
R fie Gar r p Gii c l - mr fcia! oning Pfopo a!
B t K; C i. hit}:

CL UCatcu : aun,;, tn 9 n g mmissic r, t t t ie r meetin of Janu ry S, n,
w.,,.;. r. , ,
r s! f f c; Q G nm rCia! strip ff R n, on l oad i h
I +. J ! y ! '.,
r 1 . i f t `
ra a a A l nc! i Jt t exs tin nd r po Pc re lig e Rech; ` a r, Ro d nd rj a; Pnt tn ; rj! i iivp,
i C :

T;;: ' r;;^; r ,;;;,; is i n r c mm^ s aprcv ti cf the pra ose com r? rGiai zr nirg Ub- t tr, th fir,+ n!' ii - n, iCyt S h i1 ? iC aC # t7 th2 eChr? t c'!' 11,r n Spe fic P an:
j c le,, hc as nust be usec s the anGhQr buiiding of the cammerciai center ar c r tur ished ta its c ric ina o nd tion.
wi o#t r uildinc s rnus# uti ize th ame architectur as the Cooley House. f A traffi ej n! e la ed in front of the ommerci center. v
3 Na dr f way v ill k e permitied nto the n w' Reche Canyon Road other than sic nalize i c riWeway,
No on tenience stores such as 7- 1, Circle K, etc, shali be ermitted. 1Vo t ryu r st e sha! e aermitted.
cvc sand, c h h ii tmitt d.
i ; t4r a k e e f lio 7n:
i n t be a! I vc oden and sar dbi sted.

P c signs sh li ! iluminated.

C. Si r s nat tc exceed 1" h gh and 0°f4 of storefront wi tth. t. c i rs to be Gold and Br rvn. a vGtt l f.
il 1i dE. i one sign per t nant v r e a o re ...
r Q
r. f ole sigr s sha! be permitted.
d
f-! q/
do m numen# signs sha!! be permit# ed. -
R _ .- -...-"''"`
H. Logos are not allowed other th n within the aropvsed sign. rsi rivewavs nd access roads are o k e cobble stone ( pressed cc7tncretej. r.^ v .....,, n, At: ,_:. : cr...: _. :.. ,.....:
r aae
0 J9
f.
7 1.1.b
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) i nusca iin shail r et tr E Gcn anc n S ifi c 1 n : rit rsa. c'tt'r:itit.' S inii : setbac c ten fe f; or the s, t. i C l!? C'.S S lc'lII p S t c'iCI pCl C}' fPPt f Oii1 "! P Sti pt. a r arsr trc ugh c hitc ing area wiii i e piacEu at tne rear afi i
rnt er; ai c r i r rzear t e str ar traii.
f i i i{ l. i G* i fa. t l p f.•' j C•{` ' P i St t' f: t Of f 4! r, t;'=,, r: , a- ir Ii 1~ - rr t i} r # r, ft n# tha I'eC i ar rK1nC,l.
i U1 r ui L . r t rc: i i i, r i, a u , Uic y u-i use 5 ali n a c:
cy }-- us:.
j .: 1 '`!!! t S S f) ? E' O A tor in ei! t eYce t the oole hOUS ch tw r r es. sirr iiar i r o t ry str c re may be buiit t COt'' jl iil7l ti le ., Ot i6y" nUu @.

Fl r rea ati ha b ma mum t .
i ` ' 1 A1'-' p! t f1Gc' 1 SI" 1 ' 11'PP fi? At I'11( 1 j f V @$ V qf. P, i71 P CI vc d nd andb sted. The sign shali h re the name t nitt n in i s fac.
1 }
I 1
L i! J
21 l
oley use must b p n to ublic f r vi J a mini num of ro
t mes y ear
The SeGon $ t rv of the : c lev H e Sh il k e IPaSed t 1. Qt a r year to museum vrc at za ions.

T" el. per h! errpt e r t a minima! cl ar e tt e ser-
cQ of a post office nd bil! p, rn t enter.
i street frantac an th pra c sed re iic n d R cne C. nyon Ro d sna i have cu bs, utters, an side r alks.

Th n..,, ,
arnf n R ad v r ll P err i e t rem ain ttiout
ri c iu
t ;,,: e en s.
23 ii e c mrr erc i center shaii not o en b fore : 0 am. or c ase any ater an : C3 . m., n+ith a possi i tw c: u ext nsi n t ihe is: r tion ui t i n in ommis n.
a r .,,.. ,,.. ., r, r h C.... _... v v _. : u v•...

C1E! G

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) f,, c, _ "-, _ -, fl' lci 10
r._' 1 i e . utl' lrlfi ff:: lc 3i tvp!` iy ,, i5t 1i fi' .. C trc lVta' 1 t( dU V i%. i N i l c i h' i: cii' i+:: ltil:'.
rz
r p r; ! I - f. + tin { . rQ: rfi ;;
G If ! t ; "' Jt ?'.. 00'^vhc' S' G r. r , a h d t h . u tt e xi i t ice} t i r e v r nir t ti; tY
ma} r il it ta Ath? r bici iPrfi:
v r c cu vct,, i v
c oF a Torv
C NI IUI IiTY i Et/ I Lt. PNiENT D PARTI AE NT
PL 4NNiNG Di TiSiC N
r;
a
t
J ,
py3S
r' .
t
i S
F
j .:
d' ' -
i: `+'
p-' a ,
t .

A
n . . .' ..
fi a '
Y ,
k
k. .
s
0 c,. .. r J!
J. ....
c.,, .. ,...;
i
Paae 3

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 1/ 15/ 91 Telephone call to City Clerk' s Office:

Matthew M. Peunic, Jr.

Victoria A. Peunic
2120 Hill Court, Colton CA 92324
714) 825- 1640 ( H)
When we bought our home we were told no commercial development or tract homes were to be built around the area. This was told to us by Sunland Development, people who sold the home to us. Now someone came out to our home and stated commercial property is to be built. A group of people were at our home today with flyers.

The traffic problems are tremendous already and this would take away from the rural atmosphere which is one of the reasons we moved out to this area.

Do not like the idea of what is happening and if it is going to be voted on I want you to know how we feel. Also this is the first time we heard about this and we should have been given a chance to vote on this.

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 '
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 ORDiNANCE r1o. 0- 18- 90

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLTON CITY COUNCIL
AMENDING ORDINANCE 1602. ADDING SECTION 18. 12. 158

TO CREATE THE RECHE CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN KNOWN AS
FILE NUMBER D- bv- 9U. AN ORDINANCE ALSO APPROVING

OF, AND ACCEPTING AS COMPLETE, THE RECHE CANYON
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.

WHEREAS, the City of Colton City Council has held a public hearina as reouired bv law to consider the Reche Canvon Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS. the Citv has commissioned the creation of the
Specific Plan in order to provide for the orderly, aesthetic develooment of Reche Canvon: and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found the Specific Plan to further the aoals of the Citv and to benefit the Canvon Residents; and
WHEREAS. the Citv Counci 1 does make the fol lowi na - Fi ndi nas:
1) The Plan is consistent with the City of Colton
General Plan adopted in 1987.
2) The Plan is compatible to surroundinq Cities'
General Plan.
3) The Plan does not substantiallv amend the
Colton General Plan.
4) All comments have been oiven due consideration.
5) The Plan furthers the City' s commitment to
maintain a hioh Qualitv life stvle. protect
property values, provide for the health and
safetv of i ts res i dents and promote oua 1 i tv
development.

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 b) The Plan has been scrutinized and found to be
in conformance to all applicable state and
local reouirements.

WHEREAS, the City Council has found the Plan' s Draft
Environmental Imoact Reoort tEIR) to be comorehensive and complete:

NOW THEREFORE. 8E IT ORDAINED tr- at tr Citv , ouncll or tn, City of Colton does hereby approve the Reche Canyon Specific Plan and further the Citv Council does find the Environmental Imoact Repor t to be of suff i c i e nt scope a nd comp 1 ete ness . 8E IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the two documents are herebv adopted by reference.

APPROVED and ADOPTED this dav of . 19 .

ATTEST:

HELEN A. RAMOS
Citv Clerk
FRANK A. GONZALES. Mavor
2-

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COU TY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss.

CITY OF COLTON
I. HELEN A. RAMOS. Citv Clerk of the Citv of Colton.

California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoinq ordinance was dulv adooted bv the Citv Council of said CitY and was aooroved bv the Mayor of said City at a
regular meeting
of said Citv Council held on the dav of •
19 , and that it was so adopted as follows:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

SEAL)
City Clerk of the Citv
of Colton. Cal ifornia

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss.

CITY OF COLTON
I. HELEN A. RAMOS. Citv Clerk of the Citv of Colton.

California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full. true and correct coov of Ordinance No. . and
that the same has not been amended or repealed.

SEAL)
DATED: . 19 .
3-
City Clerk of the Citv
of Colton. Cal ifornia

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Dat: January 3, 1991
Tp: Mayor/ City Council
City of Colton
FROM: Clare Smith and Alice Moore
ProPerty owners and residents of the Specific Plan Area Clare Smith: 11794 Reche Canyon Road, Colton
Alice Moore: 11825 Reche Canyon Road, Colton
Subject: Reche Canyon Specific Plan
We respectfully requ st your consideration of the following points regarding the Reche Canyon Specific Plan:

1. We own the property at the southwest corner of Reche Canyon Road and We twood Street. Road frontage on Reche Canyon Road on our land is approximately 600 feet south from Westwood Street along Reche Canyon Road. This is a very narrow stretch of the road with a blind hill. There have been some dreadful accidents because of this blind hill. Our neighbors to the south fronting Reche Canyon Road have a very dangerous exit from their driveways because of this blind hill. When this property is developed, Reche Canyon Road is required to be widened to 5 lanes ( meaning 9 driving and 1 passing lane) AND ALSO at the same time the blind hill will be eliminated. Even though the road is double- lined here, I see sometimes impatient drivers passing over the double line. Most Canyonites have to take this route to g t out of the Canyon. School buses go past. I don' t have to tell you how much safer we will all be when this situa- tion gets corrected.

Also, when this corner property is developed, there will be a 4- way traffic light at Westwood and Reche Canyon Road. Not onlv will this slow down traffic, the people trying to turn left ( north) off of We twood onto Reche Canyon Road will have a safer and easier time of it-- especially at rush hours in the morning and evening.

2. Our property is in two parcels-- as shown on the attached map.

Both parcels are in the County island. The westerly parcel is contiguous to the City of Colton ( Myrtlewood). The parcel that fronts Reche Canyon Road goes west about 500 feet to the channel. The west parcel goes from the channel west about 500 feet to Ny t ewood. ( Note that the channel runs north/ south between the two parcels and is about 100 feet in width.) Both parcels have frontage on Westwood. When developed, both parcels are required to front on Westwood, not on Reche Canyon Road.

All access will be on Westwood. As stated, our property to the west is contiguous to the City at Myrtlewood. The proper- ties directly to the north, east and south of our property are all in the County of San Bernardino.

The parcel frontiny Reche Canyon Road is approximately 6. 1 acres; the parcel contiguous t. o the City is 4. 6 ares.

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Mayor/ City Council PAGE TWO
January 3, 19 1
Both parcels are flat land and are not in the hills.

City property to the north of us has apartments; City property to the south of us has the Belco development ( 19 houses for 3. 02 acres) and the Matich development.

We have to give u a lot of frontage on Reche Canyon Road and on Westwood Street to dev lop our property, not to mention the house I live in, n the southwest corner of Reche Canyon Road and Westwood-- the house we have called " home" since 194.

In addition, Mr. Ernie Glover, the consultant with POD who worked on the specific plan, says that we have to build a bridge on Westwood in tt e location of the channel in or er to develop the property, v n though we only own property on one side of Westwood Street. So you see, there is a greater burden for development on our property than on other properties in the Canyon.

3. You have before you a copy of a letter from San Bernardino County Supervisor Barbara Riordan dated December 4, 1990 ( I believe each of you has already received that letter at the December 4 council meeting). Mrs. Riordan' s letter requests a low density land use category for the area west of Reche Canyon Road, east of the flood control channel, north of Pepper Tree Lane, and south of Harbor Southwest Apartments. Such a land use category will help to encourage development for our front parcel by making development more feasible, and development of this parcel will benefit the entire community with a much safer road. This front parcel is a prime, flat, extremely buildable piece of land that can be beautifully developed if the appropriate zoning is per- mitted. We believe that Mrs. Riordan has come up with a workable compromise, and we hope that the Council will grant her request.

Yours truly,
Clare Smit
i %%.. dt e - -
Alice Moore
ATTACHED: Map of subject area
Copy of Mrs. Riordan' s letter
h;
A.. t_ _._:_.... _ __-__._

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) n. ;
q: .;, E :,
u"..
w:. ,. ,
a , .
k.
r-.- _ ----
r
I . . . . ra . - —
t
i
i ..
q . . - - _
ti . . . . . , .
l . . .. ,
c', :-
w
t -
i
1 rok • =
p
S
z._.
d .._. . " ' •. + r+..•.... }.__ :.,, .. .

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: iiONpRABLE MAYaR and CITY GOUNCIL
aR: Council Meeting ot 2 January 1991
G
Jaime R. A ullera DireCtor of Com m un y Developm ent ` Ff 011 1. g 1BJ CT: eche Canyon Specitic Pian
E
Staff recommends continuance to Counci eting of January 15, 1991.

CITY MANAGER' S CaNCURRENC N
C iTY OF COLTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPI IENT DEPARTMENT r' 1
PLANNING DIVfS10N
0 0
E
0 U
L
oi
M.' lE tl tl r5.' t70t 1 . vOth' 7Li

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) r'
TO: THE MAYO', i I TY : OUN I L, F' LAIVI! I I li i i=: UMM I I t N, OF THE i=: I TY OF OLTC] N
E : F' E HE ': ANYOh! SF' E I F' I= F' LA I,
OMME'= IAL ZONIN
WE, THF UIVDEF' S I NED F' ES I DENTS i n t he iW: i t y f =: 1 t, n and ar ea within the . jur isdi_ t i n c f the F' e_ tie i: anyc n Spe_ i f i= F' 1 n [ JE JE: T tc the Z- ninq , f any further r mmer ial pr perty in the = ariyt n.

Our W n_ er ns 1 fl 1 I.ICJP ]. lir Y' Pc" tSPC t r f f i, r ' P= F1P . rlfly.. l'l ; caC c15 we11 as addinq addit i= na1 b. trdens f the 1 imited servi 5 urrently ava i l. ab 1 e t c t he any n .

NAME ADUF' F_SS
C1 C,.-, z..J >
a,
f c

7... .. ..................... ....................................... _....__...._..__....................................._...

T
c,:-
ti..-....f, -- ... , ,.- ......
3 c _...___.._......._. ,:•. ... :.._ v ._. . ._.... ....,.. C. r..........._..._ r-33
r
n
J

1.... .:...........'.. . I1r ri.!'.....,....... .... ..............._.....»._...................................._..._..._... { 2 ' 2v. u ._ .... . . . .. _-..___ ' c._..................._........ u y .
t
A
5 ' il '
y ..: -. .../ N-... , G I
f
l. ..`-... _. ` 1-. .. ` __ . . ......... . _ , __..._..._....... _.....`..._ .............. l 1z z C _ ....... 1.. a . .... ..-__ ..........._. ... Z.'` ._...._.. w.?..............._.... 3 n........ ... ._.... .Y_..... _ ............ ....._ ......._ ._..._......_......_.....__.. ..... ... /.. . s '`-. : 2.
3 y -: °"
C....

2. 3
f...2_.:.....¢
J '

1.....__......._.._._.L E! ..... .. .......... _....... . . .. ..............::.. . . 1 _..
r - ., r1 /' ,/
y,/
l ci i , , / f ' ,/
7r
i '/ C I L! — / 1C / - r
4d/
t ({'
L.._.:. ........ . ......_....._........._............._.............._............_........................._............................. ._ .. w. ...............».............__...........

1.__.._.,. 1......_..._..._._.._ ...................__C'..'.' (. r`.-'......_..._._...
w...._
w..___..._...._. ......... ..............

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO : THE MAYO', iw: I TY ir: CJUNiw: I L, F' LANN I Ni i=:UMM I S I OIV, OF THE _: I TY OF =: OLT ON
E :' E HE C:ANYOh1 SF' Ei= I F' I: F' LAN,
CIMME': I AL Z QN I IVia
WF_, THE UNDE' S I atVED F' ES I DEN TS i n t he : i t y f iW: 1 t_ n and ar e w i t h i n t h e . j tr i s d i t i r n a f t h e F' e= h e n y= ri S Fa _ i f i F' 1 n 0 E J E i T t the Z r ninq f any fur ther _ c mmer_ i l r perty in the nyc n.

Our n er ns i n 1 ucie i n r eased t r a f f i_ n F': he i.: any r n : ad as we11 s adrJinq additi nal burdens f the 1 imitPd servi_ es c rrently av ilable tc ttie any n.
hIAME F DUF' ESS
C . rvt G' l E , C i o C/ t.. . , Z c. 7 S" r 1....._........ ... ...... .... .. . .. .. ...... . ............... .........___................._... .... .... ...................... .......

1.....--'.._: . G'.. 1__...._..___ ..............
y_ . ,
D a . ' c.-'
r
j: ,
f ,..-,

1.._......__.._..._.._....._....._............_........._.....; , .._..... . `: z ... . t'% '.. 3.. . s ... .:..............._......_.. .... v"' 1.:...... . .._._. _ ...' 1 :.. _. '_._..___.._.. ....... ._. g--. 3- - r
r -
l...........'..- c..G. Q. ..... . ._/....... ....... C?_... " .... 11.............`.........,.- h. Z. f7J? e. -
r'24 - t' v. z3 f
7 .- j
h,:-

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) r
TO: THE MAYO', I TY : OUN: I L, F' LANN I I li i= UMI' 1 I S5 I CJN, OF THE =: I TY OF = OLTON
E; F' E: HE IYON SF' E: I F I F' LAN,
i=:C1MMFF' I AL Z ON I N
WE, THE UtVDE' S I NED F' ES I DENTS i n t h e i t y _ f i: 1 t n and ar e with: in the .. iur isdi Mt iori r_ f the F' e_ he = any_ n SF-e_ i f i F']. an fJE JEi= i ta the Z ninq _ f any further mmer_ ial pr_ perty in the nyr n.

UY n_ er ns 1 1 1 LICJP i nr r eased t r a f f i = 1"1 ' f.a: ' 1P ny=' 1 + M c'-_lC iS we11 s addinq additi nal b. rdens _ f the 1 imited ervi es currently ava i 1 ab 1 e t t t e , ny n .
hlAME
J j ,
L.?.'
a'' . i .

AI:) I)' F_SS
r
L
l _-/ LG 1 > . .................._._......_...__._............ _........................... L.- l L- . C -

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) r
TO: THE MAYO', i= I TY : QUMw: I L, F' LAfVN I Ni : UMM 7 I vIV, L7F THE =: I TY OF =: OLTON
F': : Ei: HE : ANYON, SF' Ei: I F I i_: F' LF N,
OMME:: I AL Z ON I Ni
WE, THE UNDE: S I i. f lED ' F DE: NT i n t hP : i t y _ F : 1 t n and ar ea within th . jur isdi t i._ r- r f the ' e whe =: ny_ n F i f i f='l. an OEtJE': i tc the Z riinq _ f any further r mmer= ial r= perty in the w nyt n. 0 U Y I"1 e r n s 1 Cl w 1 l.l C P 1 rl = Y' P c 5 E' C t r a f f i= _ f1 ' f.? - Fl P. c1tl y= ' 1 : r1 Cj r1 S well as addinq addit i nal burdens f the 1 imited ervi_ es rurreritly available t ttie _ any_ n.
hlAME ADll' ESS
e. r--. ' / . N G / o?. _...! ..._...__ ...............

A . ou... ...._... _ ........
r- n. 1 . _ 4.........._ . ..... ._... f._..._
w..._._..... „_.....__ . ............_ .!.. _. _.. ....._.._... . . .. .... . ... . _ _ — .... ....... .. ... l .......... _ .. ... .. _. . .... ...__ ........... ....... ..._.. .. z'-..l......... . ...... . . .. ............. .......... .. _ ..,... .....................:..................._---__.._......_................:........

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Tt : T H E. I A Y C ' , i :. l: f' ' : (::) l..i I i i:: T. L._ y 1' l._. A I IIrl : f. i l i i : Q 1"If"I I a a:[ 0 h! , L7F" T H E::: i=: T T Y r7 F' i:: f::)1... ..I_ ( 1t.(
E: F: E: HE : AhlYf l F' Ei:: I F: l: i: f L_Ai J p
OMME;: I AL Z C]I I li:

WE , T HE U I! D E' S! 71r1F I) Ir' F. i :CI:) I:: I I I :.: i. r L- h i=: i t y w f iw: : 1. h: r} n d a r e a w i t h i n t h e . j u r i d i- i: i r i f t h h:' . h e i::: ri y n G_ i f i F' 1 n Cl J F i.`: T t t h e Zv n i n g _ f a r y f u r- t t•i
r : -:
m r F i -: : i : t 1. p r p r: y i n t h M n y= n.

NAh1E r I:; Y: l::::::::;
v u S ias- e, 7 yo k T G-t c.-"

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: THE MAYa', i: I TY iM:CJUN I L, F' LANI I I i. i=:OM I I SS I Ohl, OF THE : I TY OF : a- ron
E: F ECHE CAIVYClhI SF' E; T F T i=: F' LAhI,
Ol" IMEF": I AL Z OIW I I a
WE, THE UhiDE: s I: aI ED ' E I DEI T i n t he : i t y f i: Wl t+ n nd ar ea within the . jur isdi t i r f the ' e Mt e i:
ny: n Spe i fi F' 1 n OE JEi: T t
the Z ning f r y fur ther m_ mmer W i l pr w p ty in the Yany w n.

IVAME ADD ESS
z- /? yti . z3 Zy
2- 2---- // 3 ;' y - z 32S
1---- -- __ _ _ .

J / 7 o c.,, c3 +, l . l. f a c- v, l i4 ? 3
y,
r......,........ ..... LT M_... 1.......9. .:._..._.
l , '% ' , ,,. l'
o ` C. S ! j, . 3 f ,
rr./........--..... u..._.l......... C, .. 2....._.._....... .. . ...._ ................ . ... ...._._................_.._...._._...

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: THE MAYOF', i=: I TY i: OUN.: I L, F' LANN I N i. UMM 1 S I OiV, OF THE =: I TY C F i=: OLT N
F' E: E: HE C: ANYOhI SF' E w: I F I i: F='LAN,
r: aMME : I AL Z ON I N
WE, TNE UNDEF' S I fVED F' E I DFNTS i n t hP W: i t y f i.-:_- . t n and r ea within th . j tr isdi_ t i_ n f tF e ' e_ he i=: ny n F:1F i f i w F' l. n OE J: T tc the Z ninq f any further , mmer= i l pr perty i. r7 the anyt n.

Ll Y :_ n e r n s 1 Cl 1 l_t CjP i n r s ci t r a f f i; = f' 1 ' f.? = Fl ? .: a n y n ; c'1 C r 5 well ' as addinq addit i_ nal burdens f the 1 imited ervi es currently available t the _ any n.
lAME AI:) I) F' FSS 9
1,,,.-.-. . . .... _ ... ._. ..30_0 ._ ...__.... A..L .a._. . c... . . o ,... ............._.._.... .. . .- . o._._.... .:.:''.._ ...:.................... ..._......... . 3.Q.o.__..:......_.N` . : ..........^ _ _ __ c t-: N .__......_......._.....z3.zy........ l.:'_._ r'.-....._._....._ ....................._...._,._...._......_..............._.._......................2-. s` r' .......... 9-...[, v. sQ.,, .. _' c...__.__..............'........ Z... 2.. s l . . .........____................._.........._ Z 3
C ... .._ ...... ._4 0 sa..r_ __ . __ . l. a ._...._._._...... ..3. . .

Y --
I _ '-

2. ... .. .... . . ... .. .. . . _ _ __. . __ _ .. . ...... ...:.._%'.- 3% G
S_ ` i' l/ ` iZ 2' o% 3
c ..__...._................._._.............
i Z7 il D '' c z
z.. C; e 1-, yz 3z

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: TNE MAYQ', ;: I TY = OUN: I L, F' LANN I N. U IM I SS I OIV, OF THE =: I TY OF C:OLTON
E :' E= HE : AI YON SF' Ei=: I F I= F' LAN,
C:OMME' i= I AL Z ON I Ni
r'
WE, TH UNDE' S I: NED ' E I DENTS i n t he _: i t y = - F i: 1. t n and r e within the .. iur isdi_ t ian r f the F' e_ F e any ri Spe; i f i F' 1 an OE JE' i t the Z r ninq f ny further r mmer ial r perty in the = anyc n» DUY n_ er ns i n_ 1 ude i n r eased t r a f f i _ ri ' P Flf' i":any n F; c t c'lS well a adr inq dditi_ n l b trdens = f the 1 imited servi es t trrently ava i 1 ab 1 e t t t e w any n .

IAh E F 1) llF' F5S
a, _.\ \• R. -
4'— \ ''
i',
x % ` -
I / \ v _ _
r. ...._.................................................. v - ) I `.
f
i - !
i / .' : l
r ' ' , ' ' . -
1' / / _ , ;`. c '-. - , f `,,/,
f
r .-`-,
i % . --.
y
r ,,,,. / ./
r %
r /
C.. GC i / / '`- L s'^'`
c ' . -`. ..,, __
1Jr .
1 `_.. .
j' , y% „ , `
r -' • ' , / }} /
r ;. + - .. ,% / /..
y. ............. 4+f......... M......... «. ............. . .......................__._.........._................-..._.......__.._............... ..._./.`.. l... X.. L...: k ............. .(.. . sG F:...Y...... ..!..._..... .' [....

4.. ' ' . -
t - .

1. ; . z ,
y........._......_ . .............._.._.._............._............_..............._._...___.___......_..._.._....._._............................... ........_....._......._.... ... ...... ._ . _ __ _ . ....._......._.__.__.__......_._._._....._.........................._.....

L.............' v, ., ... -`_. ' ... . _ . -... v :. : i..v_.... _.._ ...... . ......._.......................... f. .....___.. ._._ .._ .............__..... .._....... ...... . .... ...._.. .... .... .. .. 7 ,/ --.
n .
r ........... .. .... .... .........._...__._ .. r l-. _...._ ......_...._......- ............. ... _: .... . : . . ! ,. r '
Z - - e
V -- --'---.._ ..._...-'... .. .. ................. ..:..... ...... . ............ .. ......... . .........:.._ .___..............._.........__....... p`
1 1'.
1 J/' +'/ J/ _ /
G6
i`, ' — \. :
r............... .. ye_ _....

D. T .

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: TNE MAYOF', i I TY :(] UN: I L, F' LAIJIV I N i i=:UMM I I OIV, OF THE i: I TY OF C:OLT N
F' E :' E= HE : ANYOIV SF' E+=: I F I: F' L hl,
OMMEF'= I AL Z Ohl I N
WF, THE UI IDE: S I i I IED ' E I DEtV75 i n t he i;: i t y _ f i _ 1 t n and r e within the . jur isdi_ t i n f the F' e he =: ny_ n Spe_ i f i, F' 1 n OEJE T tc the Z ninq _ f ny further mmer_ ial r perty in th ny n.

UY n er ns i ri 1 ude i n r eased t r a f f i M n ' P= F1P .: any n µ c' tC c'_-" a well as adrJinq additir nal burdens f the1 imitPd ervi Ps c trreritly availablet_ the wany_
n. NAME ADI'
ESS
f ' , - ''` ' L i -,-` r ' ` t I%, ; ` ` ' ,,rLr- ' ' ' .._ .... '.'' .:.. . . .::._... . . . . .'_.. .. _ ... .. ' ......... ...... .........__......_.___.......... ...................................

L . 9 '` (' r 2. [ o lz=-.-.. h-..:. .1 _. G¢ ,-. e_ _ ..C. o.....` '.!._._..._...._.._.....:.....:.....:.......................... h..., r' t.._,._...._.-------._ ................./... D................. .(.-. ......h..9. 0 .... _...:._ ........ _/..........................._......_..._....... c 6 ., ,, u- GC crc- r, o'r G .............._...... ..._. ..1..'.._..

1..... .. ... _.....____............................._..._....__.._......._..._.................._...._.._....._............_.... . ......... . ._ ... .... . . ... ........ _..._........_.___..........._......... x ..._._...._.._.........._......_........_...:. ..._._.....___.._......_..._.......__._..._......_....'...._...._... ..Q.,. . r... . _ : _. ___........_ . ....._ ................... r. a. 3. . . _ ... .. . . ...__ . h ......... 6.

L._:...-.....
o .. 7s ! 'c' a' C'/ V pQ? ...

To. Y " . c.. . . rd - S _ _...... 2..._ ....... .. . ..... ............ .. ... . . ..... .... . .... .. . . .. . . . .................. ... 1 _._....... ................_............... 2:.. ...`......._.. .. .:
c .:. .. ,' ...... ........._........_........... 1 I? t k- ,/ E-, . ('a! . N ' 1 .
w..._.._........ ...__...__._.._.._...._._....__..._..__..__...__._.___.... _............._._........ ._..........._...._.... .. ..._..._... .._..... .. ..... ... ._. . ... .. . ..... ......._.......... ...._. ......___.____... ..._..._.._.:._._......._..._. C. ' -', w ,., -a

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Ta: THE MAYC, : a: -rv _: c:.. a:: . r. ... Y r- i._.ar v r i; w:ar r s z on, o T H: : v r i- :: c. ... r c:a i
E: F: EC: HE i: AtVYt7h 4 F ir: T F: f. .::: I" l... r:-=,1, i=:OMME' i I AL Z Qhi ]: I I.:;
WE, T H E U I I D E: :' a: C : aI` 1.=: I:i f' E: .:: : C :( : I:::: t, .... ,: : i. r {- E3 : i t y .: f i::: :{. w r i, a n r r w i t h i n t h e . j r i c i_ • L- i. _ r : i t; I-7r:: F' i:, :- I.. c:} :_: n_ y r7 , + a. f i.- F' : l. n U E J E T t t ' l 2 Z , n i n q c f 1 / ' l. t ' t'' : il t? t'' : t:: ( Ti tt' f:' i'" :: : C <:. .. : 1 '" ..- 1 ? 1'' ': ' 1 1 ' rl E = c. fl jI = ( IAME r XaI? I' [: :.
r.%- s.. ...........:t... ......... % 1.............
l l 1 n, c. . 2. 3 C u . S - ' ` O c
Z..........................................................._..........._......

C..1. .._. .`.. .................................................. ._... ._ .._. ,. . . . _ .- I/ v. N!.., . S..A............ . ................................°..>..r'r_........ l c t
i
t,
l ct z S 7i G n n., S vL,. a.

Y ...
d
a......... ..............

J
Z 7 c. Gt'" r"...... w .......... ......._.... ............. C.... l..... `......._ .

Z f--? 1-' ,' -` '
a
m..._...__.._...._:__......._.........- c . __ _ _ r ........... ..... ...................... . . ......... . 2- ; - _ . n.,.
r. _ ..,-,

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO : TNE MAYOF', ;: I TY C U I : I L, F' LANI! I N ; Oh1M I 5a I ON, OF THE _ I TY OF C:OLT Ot!
E :' E= HE ': F IYOhJ SF' Ei I F I: F' LAN,
Oh1ME'=: I AL Z O I I N
WE, THE UIVDE' S I NED F' E I DENTS i n t he r: i t y _ f . 1 t n and ar e within the .. i- r isdi t i n c f the F' e tie any_ n Spp` i f i= F' 1 n OPJ T' t the Z ninq f any further c mmer i l pr perty in the any t n.

LI Y - n e r n s i n 1 u ci e 1 fl r 1' P e15 E' Cj t r f f a. _ r : E' r1 P c'afl y ( i F: W r'1Cj r=l 5 we11 a ddinq addit i nal burdens f the 1 imited servi es urrently v a.l able t the any n.

I IF ME
1r !
S (
i` /,
lY_. .,.(
A..

V t.• i-/ tl.
i_

F DI)' ESS
h ! /,,
sri ) UrU.v`. C:-;. G+l .
j".;.. 1.. " 1
r..- ,
n .
i
f / i i/ f' " _/, ,'- , C -= y_..:`'..!.. _.. _.! ..:-%.._ C`: ":' .............__........... i4... -::.... _.......
r:,......,,, ... ..................... __ _. ... ._._...... k_............... __. s'
J
s...//
J

J' (//'
i
ya
Ld.`..... ... • .......... ..... T......». iw.......» ................ 1 ...... ...... ` r ... ......... ... . _...._.....

Lr...:S...... " f.....` .............._. .__ .. ... ........ . . . ............ :,- ......._ ...__ _. .......................... < t
r . . ..... - Q.,. r_--................ _.............._..._.....'._...75........_ .c.. ,.................-..... . .... . ............... .___.._......._.............. 3 2- y
7r
r! • :..- .........................__...........

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: THE MAYO', i I iY i=:OUN: I L, F' LANN I N i:: UMM 1 S I ON, OF" THE : I TY OF : OLTON
E : F' E: HE C:ANYON SF' E=: I F I i=: F' LF N,
OMME i=: I AL Z ON 1 IVi
WE, THE UIVDE: S I i f lED F' E :[ DE: NTS i n t hP : i t; y F: 1. t, n and r ea within th . j tr isdi_ t i. n r f the ' e- he =: any- n SF: F i f i_ F' l. an OE JE=: T tc the Z ninq f any further _ mmer ial pr_ perty in the anyt n.

Ll Y n e r n s 1 Cl = 1 l_t C P i n= r d t r a f f i = C 1 r' f.? ' F1F? r:•l rl y fl F: _ a d r_t S we11 as addinq addit i_ nal hurdens f the 1 imitPd ervi es trrPritly available tc the any_ n.

NAME AIJI:)' ESS
Z._ ...__........._ .. _ _ l` 1.. .°.. c........ .. ... .... . .... . ra.. .s t.. .........' t..... 05......_. ..._-...=..... I... . ... . .. 2-J ........ . D .. N... ..N .. ........ ... /7?. .. J. r. . : ..... _.. ....L["..... N.... . .............. a!....

1.. .Y...cx...r..-....-.,...!........_.. 1'..C.: r- e''......._..._..........._ ............. ... .?.1_'-rD..... 1o..G... ..... ..}.').o.- c:. _ _ I-..o'.._.... .. ( .................-...._.......

L , t ,
l..t. . GC._.._._._...._....1_....V... i.1..Q:s....-----....................._................._._.._...._._.......2.2. r_..._..
a yt..........._.i1 G{.(. C. t................_.........----_ L.......... Qh......... Ca.........

U N J b .. 2. . S ...... .. Q..1. ry_ .._ y» 4 1._ ..................._._..__.._L.....'.....:...c:.. w........ s....._......._..._._....._........ . . ._ ._. ..... _ .. . .... ... . .. .. . .... . . . c o . y s Jo w ', l d, , .
z . . . _ _ . ....__._...___.._....... . ...._................._ . a ,
s __, o. _ __ _ __ _ _ ..._.._....._._....__........ ....... .. . ... n
2 0......... .._._...''f' ..... .... .... . .. .. 1_...... .:........ ....._ __ .. .. . ............

5.. I..IrI............._...-7-..... _ ............. ..............._. a. .. 1.............A....

L;. l -_-- ....................._............

30../.... 3............ . _ iJ._.........°, t-,.,_.- z............._

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TCl : THE MAYQ', I iY C=OUhIi=: I L, F' LANhI I l a UMM I S I C1N, OF THE =: I TY OF C:OLTON
F' E :' E W:HE : AhIYOhJ SF' E I F I=: F' LA I,
r_:OMME' i= I AL ZON I N
WE, THE UhIDE' S I hlED ' ES I DEN7
within th .. iurisdi_ ti n f the F' e he
the Z ninq _ f any further r mmer ial
i n t h e i=: i t y _ f : l. t_ n a n d a r e
i=: ny ri 5pp- i f i F' l. an OBJE T t
r perty in the w nyan.

O Ll Y' n_ e r n s i n, 1 u d e 1 rl r' 1' P_ c'i 5 E' CI t r a f f i =!" 1 ' P= Fl P: n y n'+ w c:l C r 1-r-S well as acidinq addit i nal burdens f the 1 imited ervi wes urrently avail ble t the _ any n.
h AME ADU' ESS
3/- .. ....._-.._.._.. .._...... . _. o.-. .... .._-...... ....... ..... r_.. ....;s... __ ._..___.........,....................

G ti........... .. 7.,..._....._..........._.......

Ca.....,....._.._. _.......C. c.. fr..ma. ......................._..,.,._ 2.-..- .......... ...... .o .........^ c` , ._. ...,....._.. ....__.._.`.. L. z- .........

C 2 2' 1 Crc. s Cc.- t,. %- ' Z- Z-
V.._..._._... _._.__...._..._._...._.__..._.........._._..._..._ ................_............._......---............................................._....__...................................... ...._._._........................._..............

J S G: ra+. v G^ ..... ( G c(- L. C./ rn c- f

2.` 3
G' ,', ` - s' S .. —. w...._.._.._....::`.
w...._......_... ._._.__._.. __.._..... _........._ .... ....... ........ .. ......._... ..-..... .. . ...... ...... .......... .. _. _ i- 1 , .
2-

5..._ , . ...... ! (, ' __ 2. 3..`z-
c `" . _
C C
r --
C r_ r- ............... _......... ..... ..............:... _ _._ ....._... . _ 2-- .............__..._... -

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 11 TQ: THE MAYOF', I 7Y nUNi: I L, F' LANI! I I i i: UMM X i vN, OF THE : I TY OF i=:OLTON
F' E :; E: HE AfVY0h1 SF' E=: I F I i=: ' LAN,
r_:OMMEF; r_: I AL Z ON i N
WE, THE UhIDE: S I hlED ' E I DENTS i ri t he _: i t y F i=: 1 t n and ar ea within th . j r isdi t i_ n r_ f ttie F' e tie i=:any n : F= i f i F l. n OE JE=: T t the Z: ninq _ f any further == mmPr= ial r per y ir h anyan.

OLII'' = Cl= 2Y fl5 1 fl= 1 IC E? 1 rl Y' P Sf? C t r a f f i= = f' 1 r f'= f l? : any n :+ ad c a wel l' as acidinq addit i nal bu dens _ f the 1 imited ervi es ' urrently available tc the _ any_ n.
hIAME I:) I)' FSS
3 a.................. .... ..... ...... __.... ...._..._.......___.. .............. ...__. _ _ _................._......._............._.._............._................... a !/ 1 9 . Y'.. _ . .. _ ...._ ._..._._..._.._..._............ ...................._...... S' l
i _., l L / L % { i, , `,/ t-/...._..._.__.._...__._.. .- J...`. _ ...
l'
w...._..._::._ _ ` ......... .................. . .. . a ,
x.. 7 t GG'C ..... .%. lC'' ..._...... . 1:. ._ f _. . tG'..<-' j _ . '... 7.. U.......------...__.__ . 3.... .._ .... to 3 c
rq L al . b _. .. . .... .. . _... . r.. .... . ._ .. . . . ... . . . . _ __. _ _. . . .. ... . ......._...___........_._.... . ............ .. .../.... ........ ..

W._..___.. ..:... __. .... ._ ....._..._. .__.... ... .. ....... .... a 5 C << o l- o- a. a U
3 . ...... _- o N. t T _ c,n-. , c..... . _ _ . __._ - ro>- ....... ......_._...._.._.. . -:. 3:-.°- 1..... ....... .. 3 2 0 „ i r i' -- : " Z . ( o ( - -' n 3 -(
9 .

7. ........ ... . ..... . ' . .............. ,...... .......... . . . .. ...... ... 3 . sb 1 ..........-__.____.__... 2.._........._. -
C

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) T a: T H F r Y r.:, , :: :: _ r. , : r.7 .. r :: a: i.... r= i.... a v :c i :; Ma r r . r. a r , c: — i r.:: _:: 7: ..i... r.::, -::: c:: _ i_,:: n.i
F:E: F; E: HE : ANYO I SF` E:::: IF 1: w 1='L_F t.

Uh hIE' i I AL Z OhJ I I:

WE, THE UI DE' S I i l' i L) ' k: I Dk.:. lu.. l.. i. n L h i: a. t y w f w: m J. t. ri n d ar e w i t h i n t h e . j tr i cJ i ; i. r ::: F : I- f !' c:a .- t- r: i : tari y n 5 p F _ i. f i F' 1. . n t J:. 1:: T t t h e Z W n i n q r f r y fi t r- t t't 'r tr -: :: r7 rr ; r -: :
i <:: : i. i r { : r: ; i n t h E n y n.

IWAME c r c::::7
y _.. .. _ . _ .. . .. _.... .
ys Q , C
f
s, --- -
a 9 . _ _ C _ . _ _ . . . .. .. . _ ... __ .

S" 3 r/ t-c. y fi G - o. c S,N._............. . ... .. .... . .. .......... ......... ....... ......... . . ...... . _.. . c / c, c , _ _ .. . .. 0. `-.. . .. ... .. ... ... .. . . ... .. ............. .... ...... .... .__. c2
C, . . . .. . .
i. ._ . . _ ................._ ... ........_................................... .... l l _ 3. ..- ....... . ..... . r...................'.—_-.

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) T o: r H F r , c:ai:: 9 :: : r. r , ':: : 1l. l h! i :: :i i.... „ F= i.... i r : r. ni : : c r r 7 .r. r. n y CJi=_ _.. H I. _:. _ I_. Y t::l I :; (:: i I... ..' . : ::iI'.

E: : E w M E t: A! IY C h.l . 7 F' w :::: T F:( :-: }::: l._ r=i I' , CIMh' IE: r: A L. " 1.' C11 11: h : i
WE f T M E U I ID E' T. I I I) f' F:" c=f T Z: E::: Itil '.(_ .: i. i- t; Ii i: i. t_ y : f i 1. r < n c r w i t h i n t h e . j t tr' i r i : i. r ::: F t F F' c: : ::: h t:1 i:-: 4ar y+ r 7 :, c: i. ' f i: : F' : l. h r ( I: { J l: T t t h e Z w rt i n q f r y F t r t t 7 w : :. m rr i- : : i : 1. : , :- _ 3 r: i n k h : :: t n y r . hIAME I:) C ? f:' E::: .:7
s . ... , -. .. .... . . ._ . . ... ....... .......... ......._............ .... .. . . v
G
3 a . — m- .
cr-. __. . _ . . ... __ .. . . _. . _ _ . . ... ... ...... .. ... ..... ..... .. ... . i .... ...... ....... ................_ _/ ___ _.._.._ .. .. . ........ ... . ... .................................._. 2 ! C o, c o
w_.__.._..................._._......_ .................._. ................ .. . .... .. _ _ __ .. _ _ _ ._ ... . .. .. ... ................_ ............... ........ ............................................ ................. . e.( q__ _.
a 1 __ 1 ` O r _. i . . 7"0... r.J ... . .... ..... .. . _ .

Q, 1 - e— Z '., c., f% . --, 7—:
573 . i

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: THE MAYOF', ;: I TY o: ClUl l=: i L, F' l_ ANIV I hai i -: UMM I I( 71V, OF THE =: I TY UF i=: OLTUN
F E : F: E_: HE : ANYOIW SF' E=: I F" I i=: F AIv,
r_:Oh1MEF; IAL ZONI V
WE, THE UI lDE: S I i IEI:) ' E I DENi S i n t hP i: i t y F : 1. t_ n and ar ea w i t h a n t h . j u r i s d i_ t i. n r f t h e ' e h P i=: a n y n F: _ i f i w F' l. n O E J E: i" t c the Z+ ninq f any further _ mmer= i 1 r= perty in thP w ny n. lY_!,--.,.'" '' n c e r n s i n_ 1 ci e i n_ r P s e d t r a f f i _ l r: f? = fl P e1(l y f' 1 a d c 5 well ' as addinq addit i_ n l burdens w f the 1 imited ervi PS uYYently available t the any_ n.

I Ah1E F I:) I)' FSS
y .. I... G..... x a 8 7 c o, . 2 , . C............_.._....4.....' C C 02 ''? ,
z. . ,, "
M_.._...__.._ ...... ..... . .. ...... . . ..
z
u
5' - :- Co ` . ' 0 3-
zr z %-',', c`- .
rx -
Z Z
W._.___ :__ ... ...... ......._..._._.....__..... _........._....... _.__................ ............_... ........._......... . ........... .. .... . .... . .._ . .. . . _ .. . . .. ..... ........ .__...__._..._.... ._........._ ............ ........

5. ? . T .. ." _ . __ __ _ ..... .._ ..._._..... a
o1-,: a.w ...... ..... ..._ ...... ........-.. Q-... . _.. _. . . ... _. . .. . _ rn-.. c. _ . ..!..._......`'. a. 3a t........ ......._._-__'.. ' 1.0.. _,... ._. ....... . . S. C. I ... o_... .. . ay... ._ ...._ ......o.: iS-z........_._...`..:,... 3 -...(

2.. _., __ _..,. . . _ . . .. . ....._. ._._....... . L... zti..._f..._. ............_........... ............ ........_............_ .. .... _. f . 6 C c " -`

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) T a: r- iF. i ; c:a ti _:: : r. .... , i::: t . . •- :::: r i.... ,, r i... i : r. r, i :; ::: c7 r r . r. c r 9 7F_ _ 0.. H i::: C::: l: ..i.. ,Y' i::l F.. :::: i:: I_. {_ C:1f'.I E : F: E; HE i=:ACVYC hJ F' Ei; T F:[ i.: ! w'I....F ha , QMh' IE' im I AL 7.. Cl l 7: i` 1=
WE y T H F_ U I I D E' S: I: i: i I i h. I:) I: = f::> T I:i 1:::: I I ..f. c: : i. r - L, ti Ft ::: i. t y r: f .: :: 1. ; .- r n d r e t w a. t h i n t h e .,) l..l Y 1 (. 1=' i: 7. ; ('} i::: ' C r l E:' i''•'. (-='':_ ..i i::? ._ < a ri y= I'l 1 E:•.' : I. ' F 1:" ' .. c:11' 1 ._.. _.: .! i.:-1 Cl i" i . t h e Z Wn i n g + f ' t y f . t r' t " t r ir _: -: r7 r . ::: : i. :. . l. .; ._ r : ., a. n l. h t - y r:
hIA ` I: C:7' f::,:

JCLI/V1
n...... n....... ...0. w e. n s a _ _ C . _ r. . . ..... Q .L..-.-...n... % s _ G . . ..... .. . .. .. ..... .......(.._. z - l CT 2- d s
G- z.=
z __ _ _ _ _ __. .. _ . ............................ .. .. ......... ................... ...... .................. ... . . a
4 a c . , -- 1 - G .
l-
9,
1 .. ... c...L.....f b .... ._ C
5 _, .. _ . ..... ... ........ ..., 2 _ _
r. n^- l: . ..... . . ::... _.. ...... _ .. i'''--/' ' 57s ,
t _ _ _ _ . .... .. . . . . . . . . _.
a ` J % /?. ..

U ,
L
w.__...__ ............._.....,..................... ........... . . __. _ _ ___ '' __ . .. ... . ............................ ....... ... ........... ..................................._........_..............._ . .. j
G '
Z
J
m_ ...: ........... . . .... _.._______ / /
c.. C... ... . . _... r./ ....... t' I'.. . , - 2
l , . . . .. .

D, . G
l

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) T o: T- iF. r c: i -:: _ .. i.. ,, , : . r c: .r i.... ,, r i._ i r : c i i :, y: car r z r : n , H f : f. ._I.. .Y' (: i F:. :: :: f:: i l_ .. . ( t I. I F: E: F' E H E =: A! V Y t h . i ' E i::: : F: Ci:: I:::' 1... r i I n aMMEF': I AL Z. Cihl . 1: I"
WE r T H E U I! D E' : Ci I`•It::. I:) i' = i T rJ I: Irl ( f i. n- h P :: i t y f: m 1. t.- r- . n d a r e w i t h i. n t h e . j t tr i J i; i. : ri :: F t; Fi f: :' : -: I i c i :<:. i r y n Sp i f i F' :L a n D L J E i : T t 1 E Zwn i n q I"1y l..l i'" ' l t:? )`' +: ? tTl (1('1C; i'' :: : I, i: t 7. ::} ''' : 4..'} ? Y' ` 1 f l i: (` t P_ c:. I ` y m I't . lVAME i l :. 1t.) '. (:::. ;::a :;
v
v- 2— V fi r-........

C.. ............. ...... ... c l.-.?. Jt r.o.... .... _ ._ .. . _ ......... ....... .. . .................................. .. ....__._............_........._................. c. • r.. ......_.__._._ ........................................ 3 L f' . a . ...... .... ......... ....................... ....... ....... ........................<............... . .._... 3 S-3 . _ c zc.... . . f'... . . .. it t ....... . .......................... . 3 3 , Ga-,- , ... - c-
7 _ _ _ _ _ -.. _ , , f.._. _ ... ..... .

C%!
1„ ,
o- o . . a " a

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) fa
TQ: THE MAYO', : I TY i C UN Y I L, F' LAI IIV I N iwUMM I 5S I OIV, DF THE =: I TY OF : OLTON
E : F' E= HE : ANYOIJ SF' Ei I F I i=: F' LAN,

OMME' I AL Z ON I N
WE, THE UNDE: S I at lED ' ES I DEhITS i n t he : i t y _ fi:: 1 t n and ar ea within the .. iur isdi_ t i n c f the ' e tie any n 5 e= i f i F' lan t] E JE i t the Z ninq f any fur ther cr mmer ial pr perty in the nyc n. t Y + f l E' Y r15 i n_ 1 u d e i n r e a s e d t r a f f i - f 1 P r fl ..' c1r'1y= (' 1 '=' a Cj e - r-5 well as dc inq additi n l bt trdens _ f the 1 i. miter ervi_ es rurrently av ilable t the _ any n.
hIAME ADU' ESS
1 - r / t' .
v,,.. C.::_....: ........ .......:................_. --.....__...... .... ...... _. . .. .... ... ...................... _..._. ____........ .... ..................... J__..- ' .... ` _ .. c- d. : % ' l>
r
l fi ti . l ' ,
i ' . ,--
r',-
r ' ,
M L v.!
ti,%........_..:...._.............._....._.._.......____.__...._._._................__._._....... _........ ........................._....__.._...._.__..___......... _............... r i %/ / / / /
c.. ! ' --,-- - . ..._..._._.._.___.._ ................................._.__....... y,
4 i ' i I - . Cd- .. , 1 r C .<r'' '"' _.... ...:_" ...... ._ . . ............... ...... 1. ./..._...... t. _......._...... .. .._.........

G........ ,., r-;,. G.:......1.... ._. • .... ...
iJ/'
f Y' . x.. .._
r
L C l' <
y
r
J,//
9 C. ! ",, _ %— L. ...... _..... :
r_4r:..._.`.^ . ....._ ...............................

J
i
r
p.'- — 7 j - i''"'= ` -
z..
rcel- r.._... Z._._.. "
n-
r_ ................................ _.. ` . .......__!%..=.......-.••.----»......A..._......_........_............_ L........_.......
y
C/' ., tii' l ' __.......
1 '.,
y - -
r
j . . C ._...... .. ::::. ....._. :: ... '.....
i
c z" " L.

C G L r_•'U-
1 7

6...:-' . lr... S/........ .' sr,.Y... . ..............._ t Cc (
w/// ` - µ . t '
Y-......»....
r..........._..........
w' . ,

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TD : THE MAYOF', I i" Y i CJUNi i L, F' LANI I I N! i i: Oh1M I S I QN, OF THE I TY OF C:OLTO I
E :' E wHE : ANYON SF' Ei=: I F I F' LAN,
C:OMME' i= I AL Z D I I N
WE, THE UNDE' S I NED ' E I DE I TS i n t h i t y _ f r = ]. t n nd ar ea within the .. iur isdi_ t i n r f the F' e- hie i= any_ n SpP= i f i F']. an OHJE T tc the Z ninq +_ f any further M mmer ial pr perty a.n the any n.

LtY fl 2Y r15 iri 1 ude i n r eased t r f f i _ n ' E?= ' 1P c' r'ly r' 1 ; Wc'!(j c" 5 wel l as ddinq addit i n l burdens = f the 1 imited ervi es urrently available t the , any n.

I AME ADDF' ESS
Y
r
t i . i- G
Ci'(/ ' L ol
ti-_. ` .. ................._... __...._...._ w.._...._........................................

1..,/....... __ ...... . . ... . . . ..
i ' / '>
j 1 . . „( l :' . ..... .._. .. I;,.^ l .. . ,
G :? rL''` . .. -
c. . . c ........... . . . . . . t. ; j }
r . ,
w
1 i % - % / 7
f., , ' i. r',% /' f,/ `:' ' ,
j
11 '. f ' • '
7 l.r. l........... ' . ........ %. ..... ._ ........ ...................__..._._......__....._.. ......... ......._ .... d r. v ., .,-. ' ` , r - v
1 , '
7r. .

C......._.... `-`..x'..t . '.,``` . ''--.... w.._......_...._ ..................._....._.. .... y 1 it
C-' i., --- ? S `',- A-`' k''`'' _....
1' ..... ........ _...._.................._.....:........ +..

Q.
l5 . ti,,,, ......... ....._._..__................_..._.. .....

J _..__
f ///
f,
j
s" -. _ .' -' 7 / - :.... ._. _. .......:: ` 5,- a_ r .
1 L ....`/
V ............... ....................•...... l",!' - ,'_' _ f. r. :................_..._ ._. r L.... _.......... . _ _...........:
rr'......................_..'_. .. : .... ...... . . ._.. 3 n
r
L.- . f . i : r-
j' , =
c
r
w
r
f- ..
a` - ,,-- / - __ .................. ...................., .............. . . ... ..................._..._........._.._..._.._..._........................................

R.=.. r.' L.:•....-.., ............. --... t r_•. ............. t........_ ` 1-''
G.
p,.

L/ 1_........_.. _ .... . . `
j . z 1 .. J' ' .- G ............... "
r ....
o...-..........--
y ,
r

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) T J : THE MAYO', w I TY : CJUN I L, F' LANN I N a UI`' IM I S I ON, OF 7HE i;: Z TY OF : OLTON
E :' E: NE NYOhJ SF' E: I F I= F`LAN,
r_:OMMEF.: I AL Z ON I N
WE , THE UI DE' S I NED F' ES I DENTS i n t h e i t y f i=_ 1 t_ n and ar ea within the . jur isdi t i n r f the F' e he ; nyr n 5 e= i f i, F' 1 n t] E JE: T t the Z ninq _ f any fu ther r mmer ial pr perty in the ny n.

Ur w n er ns i n 1 uciP i n r eased t r a f f i_ n ' E?= f P c'ifly Wrl ; w C S well as adrJinq addit i nal b. trdens r_- f the 1 imitec - erv. es currently vailable t the any n.

AME ADL) F' E S ,
y- ( 7 <<< ..
9 G s -......._.__.......... . .. .. . . . ... . ..., . . ......... ... .....

G `
ac G
G'L. Q - .._....__.__..._.._ •
w___._ :.-.._..._.... ,,`'` .. . ... .......`
y
5 i' , ..',,'. - .:-, 1. r t- : G .,. ....___.__..._._.:- L ..:.......... .._...- .. ' i 1 ? `' / /
i. '
7 7' / (.. i"
i' ... Y J ' ............ ..... ' ' .........._./" """ l _ ................ ..... ._•• p. z:_ ........... .... ..._..._....___._..............:`...._.._......._.:.._...... ...._ ........_..._...._..........._--... . . . _. .. J... y /
p -
y w/ ,, A , " ,
l ._.._.._ ....................

E
r ? c. jl -- C " , - ...... ......_. 1....._.....:............_........_..._.__..._.............. .............. .... ... _ ... .. .. . ... ..... , a=
a . ...................._...... r................. t i ............................... .. .

1... . ........._...._...»...._..._ .._ .
7S

1. .. _ . .. . . ...
t q . 1....... .. ........_ _ ....._.........._...-............ . . S 1' ? o z.;....... _ 3 fY
c- . f
r I !

1...=- td .. .... ... f .. ... C... l....... __ . ''
1 / _ /
i
Z'":..___ s. ., . _. r...._. 5.... 2.. :............. ....... ... .. .... . .. .... . ...._._ f
z..__._ _. . S'.1....... .._. ..............-. ''' f ..-../`..........__ _ Q,/ i ! -, ? .. c .. , 7 J..... . ............ ......

W...,,..•:

G'...... ...... . E - • = r•-
1f ' - - - ( ' r - ( v '. -- , --
I , r C -
W_........._..........
7% J f
r __......_ _ .. ..._ ............................._..............__.__._....... _.................._..._._...._......_ r.

F .
y - / j , ..,.

C... r / . J'` /..- Z-di 1r !

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) d
TO: THE MAYOF', i: I TY OUN I L, F' LAIVN I I! = UMM I SS I ON, OF THE =: I TY OF' C: OLTOhI
E : E w HE t YON SF E I F I,: PLAN,
r_:OMME' I AL Z QN I N
WE, THE UNDE' S I aNED ' ES I DEN1` S i n t h e : i t y _ f_ l. t n and ar e within the . j_ r isdi t i n r f the F' e Fie i= any n Spe i f i F' 1 an OE JEr- T tc the Z r ninq f any further _ mmer ial r perty in the anyt n.

U Y' = n e n s 1 tl = 1 U C E'' 1 I"1r Y P c15 2 fj t r f f i _ r : P fi P c' r' 1 l rl w' C S we11 as adrJinq additi nal burdens _ f the 1 imited ervi es r trrently available t tF e any_ n.

IVAME F DU' ESS
r? ` C —( "
J _ 1 1......_
1 II :----............. z
r -----, ,
3 r.., . .. _
e t y; J -
r z r v y - -- az s e. . __ ._ . .... . ... .. ....._ . ............................... _...... 1 ...... ..... . .... . .. ...... ... .. .. .... _.._ ......_. e r ,/,) f L l r Y cj1................'_'_ ....._... 1 f
l ~ _
L
5 : . - } 1 ...................: Yz ' ' , q
f _
J .:............................. ....................._.......... ............... w.».........»....«.........
r...............................
w.+.».. r.....»...................... .
l . %
j .
y Co. % 3
J " % ' ' Z"'. ...................._._._._.......»...................._.............__._.... c r S .. . ' ii re. . .. ... .... .__. f. Z. .. ....(i . - .. ........._.. i....... ....... ...... ..... „....... ..................._..._..._................ _.

L ..... .,,,....'.........::......._...._.........../........' i ........-......._........._ ............ .. Sl . 1... ..`_ __. .-,, . ....../......:...............?,. ....._.._........... citc .. .. .. ..... - '' S-' L''... .-:-' ,.. 3Lti -
z,,. y.,. ti,..,....._..... ..,..:_, _/_.........__...:.._.:: . .;,<... . =....._.._ r:._

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: THE MAYOF', : I iY i=: OUhli: I L, F' LANN I N _ Ut iM 1 I OIV, OF THE =: I TY OF i=: OLT ON
F' E : F: E^: HE : ANYOh1 SF' E=: I F I i: F' LF N,
r_:OMME C: I AL Z ON I N
WE, TNE UIJDE' S I i hIED F' ES I DF_.NTS i n t hP i: : i t y _ F i-: 1 t n and ar ea within th . j tr isdi t i n r f tF e F' e tie = ny n F:= i f i F']. an OE JE: T tc the Z_ ninq f any further _ mmer i l r perty in the r riy n.

U1'' Il; E' Y' Il5 1 fl= 1 ICjP i n- r< s ci t r a f f i; = fl r' f.-? f l'' all)/= f1 F'_ ad 5 wel l as addinq addit i_ nal hurden - f the l. imiter erva._ es _ urrPritly av ilable t the any_ n.
h1AME F I:) I)' ESS
t . Z ` TV' a ' ... .-. . _ c - C.c- . _ c. c_. .. .,.. .... . Z y i
I

1..G.,.Q ... .. _ C. ..._ .........°.- .. Z ;
i c a C 1 `
0 9..... : . . - .. . . . .... _ __..... . ...'.._. a3 f../. . _ -,. '... _..... _......._.. ra
c-o __. _ _ _ , _ ......._..__ L"........_23
c/_ _ _ _ _ _ . . e.. .._ ... .. . ... a
7 S .._...-. C ........_% iZ__._._......... 3
a _.. ... . .. _ _ _ _ . . . . ...... .__.-- - . .. .. ...1 i a ,,. P , . , c , c z3
w - C. ...... __............ .. . . .. ._ .. ..... ...... .....__.. C,,..........

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) T d: T H F. I 1Y( 7 {T' , i:: : C f Y i: (: l..l Ii:": T L... Y 1=' I.._ A hl Irl : f. 1i: i i: C M Irl T I D I , C] T H k. : GT Y U F :: C: L.. ..I.. 1h.l
E : ' E: HE C:ANYt I I iF' E w: T F : :: l= L_F h1,
i: OMhIEF' i:: I AL ' Qhl 1: ii;
WE, T H E U f JL : F' S]: i: h N=: I:i F' E::: f:: : f. Z: E::: Itii .. .;:: : i. r- t; I t i. t y r f i ::: 1. t :- r i :. n d a r a i-: . W 1' ' 1 ]. 1"1 t'. fl . J L_l Y 1 I: 1. ::: ': 7. i r'} : ; l r::' f' i::' ': 1 k::? . i::t I' i, r' .: I'l :: a 7 E.. "' 7. I' . l ' .. c1 f' 1 . '_ , e 1 w n . n q f C'i / f u ' r .. #" t i: a r ... .. i t i i' tt t: r :: : L <:: t .. : !- : i :' E:'. i'' ' ` 7. f l ' 1 E:? i: I +_! {- i a NAME a: x r: r::.:;
y..... .__.._...._... ............................. ... .. . .. .. . .. . .. . . . - ._ _ . . . ... .. . .. .. ......... ............ .. . . ...... . .... .. . .. . .. .. ... .. .. 9 3 sy w.._.: .. .... ......................_....._........ . _ ___ _ _. - 4a _ ................... .......... ............. . .. .......... .2...3.Z_...... . l Z , 2.. l _ . ......... .. ...... ... .. ., ... ....... .................................... s z ___ e. Q . .. .. ..'.... 2.'--. 2-

1..._........ - 2. G.._...... ... ..... ..__.. ............_....... .__. f 2 . o r. . . . z lc. _ __ _ __ . .. .. .. . . .... . , Gi• .... .,--• ... .:
57 . . ..... 3. . .. .. ........ .. . .... .....
3 % t .. _. .`.. .. . C . Y

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) T 0: T HE I"IA Y 0:' , =: : I: T' Y=: t71..11 1 :: : l_ y F' I._ F hl IV :CI I .; : U M M I- r OIV , OF THE i : CTY ClF- : C.lL 1 7f 1
E: ' EiW:HE : ANYQha 5F' E: T F l: i ' L ha,
Dh ME I AL Z Ohl I li
WE , T H E U IVD E' I P•i k T) I E= c= I i:) t::: I I f . . r l: h r :i. t y :: f=: w 1. t n n d a r e w i t h i n t h e .. j u r i t i M ; i r r} ,: F ; I- t:: :' : :: 17 c n y-: n 5+ i. f i w F' : L n 0 E J F_ i : T t c t h e Z+ n i n q f r y f. r- t r
r ,: :::
m rr c 7 :: : i. <: 1. r r p e.- r : .; i n t h n y n.

IVAME r' t:? t I: r:::: ::> =;
r
1 ' - G i1G L- /
y-
T
P ............... _....... . . _ . . ... . . . . . -2 ? l ... . ...... .... .... ................... .............................._... ... ..... ..-.. ...... ..... ....................... ..._......f? r
3 2,a UGc,.w. -. . C,o.. l-e,-.-
G
C'.o-.

L3 c.¢.:, .
e .............»...../..»'.. ti............««»......................... ...... ........^.. ................................ ............-........... ............... ................. _.......... .. .......................,............., ,................................................................................................... 1 f 1 ....................
o, v
j
t.. _ _ l S __ c.. l. . _ C _ .- R.._._ .... . ... .. .. ... --- Y i,.. .. _ ... . . . .

G a- G...........'...... Z- ...:............:.................... ..

I / s,
i
I ' •/ •
o`` ,' C oa r C
Z...__. .. ... ... . . _ .! 1 o .. ...... .. ...... . . ....... ....... .. ................. ...:.a.=.. ...... .. ._ - l 3`
J........... .:...... 3 _ ..o. . .. .... . .. ._._........... ..: .............. ... ...._....... ...... ....... ... . ..... ._. ... .

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) f0 : THE h AYD' : I TY M:CIUhI: I L, F' LAi hf I hl i:: D IM I I Qhl, DF THE i I TY CJF : [ JLTCIh
E :' E: HE Ah1YDh SF' E w: I F I: F' LAhI,
QMh' IE: W= I AI.... 2 01 I I lV a
WE, TH UhIDE: S I IED ' E I DEhIT i n t he i t y f T: il t n nd r ea with in the . jur i d i t i w+n f tMe ' e whe =: ny n Spe i f i F' 1 n QE JE M:T t+ the Z. ninq w f any fur ther - mmer Wi l pr perty in the ny n. p yE ADD' ES
r Sh ` , t t .-......_ ............................... 1........ u ................_.................._.._............. :y. -.....__............. ...................._......................_.. -.'..............................__..................... ......................._......... g' y .
1 c 1 1,:'
4 f
Ya'' , w
e.
3 Q..:........._............ .... ....
a G ....... _ ....._...._............_._..._
7s . a r ____ __ _ ... 1.___.._..........._ ................ l)
i i uc+ c cz._- - Co/ a Ca 3 j`
r %,( G.,
j x/ r r
G L-
uc -

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: THE MAYO', i I 7Y i= CIUNiT: I L, F' LANhJ I Nia i UMM r SS I ON, OF THE i=: I TY OF i: OLTON
F E: E: HE : AIVYOh! SF' Ei I F I i: F LAN,
r_:Oh1ME._: I AL Z ON I N
WE, THE UfVDE' S I ial ED ' E I DFN T i n t hP i=: i t y F i-:_ 1 t= n and ar e within th . jur isdi t i_ n r f the ' e- t e =: ny- n F: F i f i- F' l. an OEsJE: T" tr_ the Z_ ninq _ f any further mmer ial pr perty in the w nyan.

UY ( l w 2Y' fl5 1 fl= . l..ICjEP 1 fl Y P< SE? C t r a f f i = f' 1 r' f.'_ fl'' rlyi ' 1 : Cj c=15 wel l as addinq addit i_ nal hurdPns f the 1 a. mitPd ervi PS rurrently available t tt e any= ri.

NAME AI:) I)' FSS
a o_. z..... ......... . _. . .2". .._ .. .......` " y ° . _ ...._ ._. '.

L=2- ._.. .--z / . .. .. . d . .- . G.. .L. z ._....... . ..r. . cJ n a a. _.. l.... . ._ .. . _ . r. C- Q__ .. ...___...t....... .2. z IllN(, (/ ( JZ- -...._...... ...... 3?i
a. c__......1.,......._....._......._..._._.....__ ................._.._..._..__.....1....5..............St. vs. r'.......G..r....__.C_r L,.',............. C..2.._....__%-.j ............................

Q O J .
c d j`J r_ p - t J C ....__._.._...___._.......... ......_........._........ dv ... iit%/ G,......_.... 1' . . . OrU_..... ... . ... 7 .._................. Z>.... .../../. c.,n..: . s. i___.____._. ...a.._._..... n, u.. o.c.. -- -......._._... a3. a` I.'? _. .........__..._.. .......... cm"`' e:........._ ..............._.........:-_.1... 3.....`.1..... /. o o v 69. J e ... o _.. 3zL . ... . a-..... _......... 3c.., ... ...... ,. _.. . . .. ... .... . ..... ... ..._ z......_..z.... .. 2l z. 3zK
i `
M.______ _...____..._ __._..._.._.._..._........__........_........._.... .__....__ ...... . ..... ...... .... . .... . . . ......... ... . . .. . ........ ........... ..._.______._._______...... _.....__......_._.........._ r . 3
1 __ c Wa.. ... Il S G, o. c d

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: THE MAYOF', =: I iY =: nUNi": 1 l_, F' LANN I i i::: OMh1 I j T OfV, ClF THE =: I TY OF C: CJLTON
F' E: ; E: HE : AIJYOIV SF' E: I F I=: ' LAN,
OMME:: IAL ZONIIVi
WE, THE UhIDE: S I i NED F' FS 1 DENTS
within th . jur i5di t i n c f the F e hP
the Z ninq f any further _= mmer= ial
i n t h e : i t y _ fi i: 1 t n a n d a r e
i: any n SF: p= i f i F' l. an OE JE: i tr
r_ perty in thP manyan.
ll Y n_ e r n s 1 fl = 1 U C 2 i n_ r e e d t r a f f i, _ r r' f.? - Fl P: n y n c' Cj r t 5 well ' as addinq addit i nal burdens f the 1 i. mited ervi P_ 5 currently av ilable t the _ any n.

NAME AI:) IJ' ESc
r'
1i
1 /
f
r - ---
y! /~/ y
ry / ,
f
C. '_- -" '
j ( / , 1 /
f ._
r
I / (' , `
l.- . .- .. .
f .. ...........

Y. .. ... ...

O1 ` t -+ f % '.. f,/ ./ 4, .. . `. ' ./ L ":. ........ ..._.._..; . . . .(.. r i 4i
G ,.

A..
r , ,- 4 ...__..... __._..._......... . .. .................... ... .. iL (. v U L t _. . _ . _ . .._. j
I ' /
y /'
y /
C - ' .
f ,;
j 1 (- r1 ,.. P` ! (' " ( 1 ...... . . .....
f t"......... ... t 1 i•).,...... 1 `...._.

C' <
G
l
r....: _ r....__.._..........._._..........._._._..____.__..._........._.._..._......_............... ... . ........... rl
r-
r , .,-- . _.... .. . ., .'::
r '" . .'= . r_.,,::........ . '- . r ... :.. . ...... . :.. r.. ... ._._ ,.__ ..................................... ' . _.. ._. .. ... .

I '
LL.
c c ... .: i1.: . . . .. .... - ..._,,.: r . .... ...`:' ti :..... . !. ,.. . c....._. . c ;.i w}-:

J I ` Zz Z C S - 7r», c.J ' Z 3 c 7
Z3
e 5'.. C- .e.: n^. . _ ....'................___.. :_......................'.'!.......... Q( Z 3 z. e Ge . :_ _.. ._ ..... .. ... ........ ...... ...... .

Z -
z
s,.. .... .._..... ......._...__. . ... ... . ........ . . ... ' _ __ __...g.:., Cu
c

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: THE MAYCJF', =: I TY i CIUIVi.: I L, F' LANIV I hai i :: UMM 1 S I ON, OF THE _: I TY OF i=: OLT UN
F' E: : E: HE : ANYOfV SF' E=: I F I: F' LAN,
OMMEFtii : I AL Z ON I IV
WE, TNE U IDEF: S I; hIED F' E S I DFra T i n t hP : i t y = f:: ]. t n and r ea w i t h i n t h .. i - r i s d i_ t i n f t h e f:' e- h =: a n y n a FaF = i f i= F' ]. a n O E J E: T t c the Z ninq _ f any further __ mmer i l pr perty in the wanyt n.

U Y = fl e r n s 1 Cl 1 l..l Cj P i n_ r P a S d t r a f f i = I" 1 ' f' : I'1 t:? : n y n + c Cj c S well ' as addinq ddit i nal hurden f the 1 a.mitPd ervi_ es urrently availabl. e t the any_ n.

NAhtE

2.CQ: L` ..... ....._.....
nI)' FSS
r
t ' 3 . s. G- L C%N c.<, v oD F . . .. . ..............._... w..._............._.._.... .... . .. ''..` f._...... . fF C GZ' v. c 2 3 i ' o` ..., . .._ _ . ._ L-" . ....._. ...__.. _._..:....3 .................. .... Z 2 ! D Jo irV I' la . o % c

C--- - '
r / - ,
l."`%. l..i. G,"'. !• C
G
l/ c......... ___....._. :................................... j`- . z3..... .. .. ... ... .. .. .
r__.. . ... . . . 0 _ T'. ...__,-,,,. ......
r. o .................... .......... . . C--'................._.. l 3..L............__....... z z
N:'_". -.._ .... . ........__.._ .__._..._...__.............._......5_.v....................... . ...._................_...... _.. ............................................_ ....... r C
v -
GC . z-
c-. z

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: TNE MAYO', =: I TY : OUt l w: I l_, F' LANN I h.l= i ::' UMM T,.-. I ON, 7F THE =: I TY CJF' i=:OLT ON
F' E : F: E: HE ': AfVYOiV SF' E: I F I: F' LAN,
r_:OMME; C: I AL Z ON I N
l '
WE, THE UIJDE' S I NED ' FS I DENTS i n t hP : i t y _ F i: 1. t= n and ar e within th . jur isdi t i n c f the F' e he : any_ n SF: F= i f i, f=']. an OE JE=: T tc the 2_ ninq f any furthPr =_ mmer ial pr perty in thP - anyt n.

DUY _ n er ns 1 fl 1 l. IC P_ i n_ r P s d t Y 1 f 1 r' 1 r' f- fl? : any n ; c( j c 5 well ' as addinq addit i nal burdens _ f the 1 imited servi_ es currently avai 1 abl e tc the = any n.

AME F L) I)' FSS
o / I 0% Tii t C. C T '- 9' e o '"
C- ....____...... ...... 3a
t ,... G - __ _ _' ._. ...' ...-- -_."........ .._..Z:.l'.zy 1 ..,..... __.. .._ ........................... -
z - ' ._ ............_...._ C- _ Z3
t,
v `
C}
a ...,, d I- . ga Vv1, ry c.. Y c
1 - 1 i u' '
a... l.:_'.....!............................: .......'.........._..............................._.......................'.. .?'.... _.............. .. ..._. ..... . . .. .. .. ._... . . ........... .............._.__..__.____._............................................. 1 - .. -- _.._ .... _.. ......_......_ . .. ....... .. . . ... . . . . .. . :. . G_......w.._ - :...... c..... __..._.__,/.,'_.............. 1....,
v, ................._........
vN..._.................'.....___. ---.___.__......_......._........._.........._ eP - i1. f i- 2

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO: THE MAYO', = I TY CJUIV- I L, F' LAN I I I Uh M I S I Ohl, OF THE : I TY OF' C:OLTOhI
E :' E: HE ' ANYOIV 5F' E: I F I: F' LAIV,
r_:pMMEF_: I AL Z ON I N a
WE, THE UhIDE: S I: f IED ' E5 i DEN7S i n t he i t; y f 1 t_ n nd ar e w3. thin the . jur isdi_ t i n f the F' e= he ny n 5pe i f i_ F' l. an QL JEC T tc the Z ninq f any further c mmer_ ial r perty in the nyan. 0 Ll 1'' : _ n= e r n s i n_ 1 u ci e i n_ r e s e d t r f f i _ n' P Fl P. c' fl y= rl w a d c S well as addinq additi nal burdens r f the 1 i. mited se vi_ es urrently available tc tFie = any n.
r' l

IVAME ,
j` ADD' ESS
C /
a , ! , ,
r , ,, ' / ,/ ` I
i " i _ ;_ - . ' ' ` i - ;_ '
u{. ° ' % : ' _ . ... _ .................— 1............_.._.__.._..........._........._........ .. . ._ . _ .... ...... ....._ .........__. r.._..............._..........................................

1.. '. r ...
4 l.' / `'
L
n . ,
r
1 , a
j' fJ- 7 / .:, r . l t ,
L `
U .

1... -.. u4..+. -....._....../..._...._._._ ._.. _._......._..._ ....................

V ........., ..,. ..,,......................_............ / , .. ..s..'. r? e l i. 5,,..... t.. /....._.._._....._ ___.__. _. y.. t......._ ._. .. r..__...»..__.._ ............. • ,
f . ....... .. . . . . ......:.
i j
r
a // . .
s ,. ,
7 // / J`
I , /,!` /
r'' ' „
f ' ,% .
j
L.- 6•.. ` i' ................. .. /,,, _'`. .../. ... , j. f.......... ..._. `... .. . . 1: r ...// j y/`- " .. /:.: tu,: . i..... r`
L.... ... .. a........ .. . ... _....... .

I// F''._... _f••• . ...._ 6i ........................»...... .. .. ....'. r... ........ ............__..._ r ,!— .. --- ;. , .. ; .
r-
R ,.....-+—.......`..

S .. .....
cr.. . ......: z.... . _....._ . . ._ ...... . ............ . _ _,,.<..._.....

1.,:..... . _ -.._»- , . x!..... .
r . .......... ....... .._. . _,...
eG•»-•....._ ......... ..
f f' /,%// / ,. , ' ,
fI
u // !' / !
1 i -
V 4i j F 1 / __ G,... ... .. _ ................:. i ..'.. .. e. ... ........... ... . ... . . .. . ..}.. .. f ' i l '
dc i ! ...._._. __....... ... ......._ .............. r ......... .,
r .. ... :............_.. fy ..:_... jc3r....._.........__.......-. f
l` ^ -' `' ' ` +
j - `, --- ,_ , V .. r . --
k . C l C c.r(. -
6j
i. ../.... ' ' ............ .._................. . . .. .._ ._ . ... . ..._..... .._._._..__.__.._.._............._._..........................

C .... .
r

21..........._ ... .. . ....._...........: ._ .... . .... .. . . ..... .. ..... ....._ .._.._-...z.......... ..... _ s G h .
1" ' <<.,',
r..-..- - = a ', `, l i % t I 1. _"; Yi- ' l _"' y' i`., ; < i'..,- ' _ j. f 4 .
r ,_.._.-, `%
C Z. - j •. / , / : ,' .. r \
f- .. . .•._...,... f.- _ i . _ __
t._ i " 7 ...- ` . " .
1' -' . ___"
r
f _
r _ j
y ) ,,. .
i- /' .`` `( 1,: ' - ' I •........... .._..__. ._..._........... ......_... ...._... ........._. ......... .___......_........._ l
i • ^ _• •
i C r >,^. 1' _ - -' .
j / 1 -- ?' _ s - !. . ;
w_- ,
j --;+ .... „ S / ,. l -
i
r / ` % •, ', . , ; ,/ _ . -_ . . , ,..

C.. .
y , , '
f . - ` .

VV ` / ._. . .... ....... .......
l.. Y.+... ', .. ....................._.....»...
w . , , ., .. ..,, n.,. yr. ,...._ . ,. /
d .

J / , g ! . -
i _. - t- Y . ._
t..
t ' , / F u; i . L ' r... _
U , .

V
r ,
r r
f( , , ., / .. , . ; , ' u . _ .

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TD : THE h1AY0, : I TY r_:CJUN W: I L, F LANI I 1 UMM I SS I ON, OF THE i=: I TY OF OLTON
E : ' E T:HE i=:AI YON SF' E= I F I i=: F' LA 1,
r_:pMME' i= I AL Z ON I N
WE, THE UNDE: S I I lED F' ES I DENTS i n t he i t; y f i,_ 1 t= n and ar ea with in the . j r isdi_ t i n f the F' e tie any_ n 5 e= i f i= F' 1 n JE: T tc the Z wninq , f any further + r mmer ial r perty in the anyc n.

D IY' _ _ n_ er ns ]. fl 1 UCjE' 1 r'1 1" Pc SECj t r a f f i _ n ' f': iiP ... clfly ( 1 + c:iC c" S wel l s addinq ddit i- n l burdens c f the 1 imited ervi Tes currently available tr the , any n-
hIAME F nDF' ESS
t..__.. .._ _...... ,.... _ ....._ .__..._......__...... ............ .. .. . .....'.. _. ..............._................. 1 --
t.:........ r:.. ....... . ..

G ..........._ ................................... . .. .__......._..._....._..._..__..........__................................. _.. .................................._..._._.._...___...._.......... ... . l............ I.. _........
f..
r
I 1
a . . .............. __..._._.._.................._..............._..._....... r ..t.. ..._....._ ....... ................__..._._. _ . ._ d ,, _ ; ._.. - ,
C C l . .. h _ .. .. _. .. .. ._ ..... ..............__.._.__ .._........__..............._.........

J ; _., ° "

4...- Tt.....,.... G:,:,_,......
u . ........ .. ..:

L" ,
Zs.. ,........ ....... _ .....
r
G
I . . ........ 1 : . . 0
n
r- 1
f
L
f . . : .: ..'.. . .....:..... _.."...._.__`... ..... -.. . _._.`.._...........j':: L .. _ . -- , ... ... _ .. .............. ........._. ...... _ f.. ; ......

G
3 r s - .

C,.. . +, c c:... ._ v c. c> ,
y,...._......._..._.........._.._.._...----._._..__.___..........._..._ W__...__.....__.__._._.__._.._..---__.___....._ ............._ :... _.....__................................_............................ ... . ......................_. 1 C. , i( o ; 1t'7' __ __ _ ..: ........._...._ ..................... r-.

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TO : THE MAYO', _ I TY = CJUN W: I L, F' LANI I I N = OMM I SS I ON, OF THE =: I TY OF C:OLTON
E :' E: HE AhIYOh! SF' E=: I F I i; . F' LAN,
r_:OMME_ I AL Z ON I N a
WE, THE UNDEF' S I IED ' ES I DEN7S i n t he : i t y f i=: 1 t_ n and ar e within the . jur isdi t i_ n f ttie F' e_ he = ny n p- i f a. F' 1 an DE JE T t the Z ninq _ f any further _ mmer= ial r_ perty in the r ny n. l. 11' _ n er ns i n 1 ude i n r eased t r f f i_ _ r ' E?= flE' . ar' ly= r1 r"1C c"IS we11 as addinq addit ic r al burdens f the 1 imitPd servi_ Ps c. trrently avail b. le t r the _ any r n.
t IAME AT) UF' ESS
w. w...... ..............................
c. ._._.._........._.._._r........_ .... . _. ' L. : ............ __..._..___ ...... .. .... .................... _....... j } r1., , j . .... . Y.......... _._._........_._.._..__.............................._..._....... 6 ,, e. . - .-.
r...,r'' ` .. _ ... a,- - -
t._._..............._........ _......_.._ .................... 1' t ?_ t ` C, D L I

7...... ......._ .......... .. ... .. .___..__.._._ ..........................._.......... a
1 . 1 I \ ` i tri lr , `'
i....................
z - . a C
1 /s .
c, y C f t

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) TD : THE MAYOF', i: I TY i=:OUNi: I L, F' LANh! I N: i: UMh1 I SS I ON, OF THE =: Z TY OF' i= OLTC] N
E :' E HE = AI IYOhI SF' Ei I F I i: F' LAN,
r_:CIMMEF: IAL ZONIN
WE, THE U IDE' S I NED F' ES I DENT S i n t he i at y F = _ l. t n and ar ea within the . jur i. sdi_ t ic n f the F' e= Fie = any wn S P= i f a. F' 1 n OE JEi T t the Z+ ninq _ f any further _ c mmer_ ial pr perty in the Tanyc n.

UY n_ er ns i n_ 1 ude i n r eased t r a f f i_ n ' P= F1P : any n r 1Cj ci5 well a adr inq ddit i n l burdens f the 1 imited ervi es rurrently available t tt e ny n.

I AME AUI)' ESS
y 3Z
C 4' ' i ! , ' . 6.. r p l c n , -
c c aY c_..._.. ... _ -. . . - C ...:.............
l..c. ' .... . --,........ - 7,f ---.--', .-,--:'--..` ` 7' ' S
i G2c ' 3 -,. L". tS ' n. ' 1.. (/ ( - t '. `' G/ r .. _ 3/ r......: . ................... ........................._ ........_......._........_.............................._.........._......._.._......... .. .,.. _... .... ...... ....... ..... ... ........... ......... ... ......... . . _........... ........ ...__....__..... ............ .._. y r' 9 `, r
CZI. . . .. ' - ........__:___..._.. .......'.-. .....
n........... o... l st. __.. r. ....... 1--....,.....-....:. 3a i 7e>,
w__............._....... 9'- z
N
C z 4
r.....s.' ......................... ........................... ._ ^_......_.......... t................ f` 2 Z1 - l . u.. . .. . . .. . ........... . . ....... ......_.._.__._._................ C........__........... r s
G .
c......... ..„.._..... .. r. .. .... . . ... ............. ....... ... ..._.a_.. _.:................_..,.._ J........ . ... , i .._._.._.._ .............._._ .. . , / J
7 y
1' \
1RJ.•. i• ............._...-`
1i. lv 4.. • ._.... x._.__ ........................................._...................._........... _

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 15, 1991
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Colton was held on the above given date at 8: 15 p. m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, Mayor Gonzales presiding.

Council Members present were Roman, Cisneros, Rehrer, Lofy, and Mayor Gonzales. Also present were City Manager Sotelo, City Attorney Edwards, and City Clerk Ramos.

CONSENT CALENDAR:
1) Minutes
December 27, 1990 - Adjourned Meeting
January 3, 1991 - Regular Meeting
2) Warrants
99661 100060
165354 165471, 165472 - 165763
January 10, 1991
3) Bids
Award of Bid, Truck Hydraulic Equipment Company, $ 14, 069. 41, refurbish Vehicle # 254, Electric Department.
4) Bids
Award of Bid, Consolidated Electrical Distributors, $ 22, 905. 06, Electronic Ballasts for various City facilities.
5) Bids
Award of Bid, Cooper Power Systems, $ 7, 610. 49, various Trans- formers for Electric Department.
6) Bids
Award of Bid, Dictaphone Corporation, $ 20, 183. 07, Multi - Channel Voice Logging Recorder for Police Department.
7) Notice of Completion
Accept Underground Service System at La Cadena Drive and " E" Street as complete, and authorize filing the Notice of Com- pletion.
8) Notice of Completion
Accept Westside Park Erosion Control Project as complete, and authorize filing the Notice of Completion.
9) Tracts
Approval of Tract No. 14159, John Laing Homes, 15 lots, West Colton Community Facilities District No. 89- 2.

J AN 1 5 1991

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 10) Police
Approval for purchase of Police Canine with Donated Funds. 11) Agreements
License Agreement for upgrade of Overhead Electric Line across Santa Fe Railroad Right - of - Way at Terrace Avenue and La Cadena Drive.
12) Building Structures
Set for Public Hearing, Tuesday, February 5, 1991, adoption of Ordinance on Seismic Retrofitting of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings.
13) Performance Bonds
Consider Resolution setting amount of Contractor Performance Bond per Ordinance No. 0- 23- 90, RESOLUTION NO. R- 4- 91. 14) Annexations
Consider Resolution authorizing Staff to initiate Annexation Proceedings on South 44, RESOLUTION NO. R- 5- 91.
15) Lease/ Purchase
Request for Lease/ Purchase of two Computer Disc Drives. 16) Agreements
Mead/ McCullough- Victorville/ Adelanto Transmission Project Amendment No. 2.

Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Lofy, to approve the Consent Calendar. Unanimous vote.

Flag Salute
Mr. Eugene P. McMeans, 2025 South Glenwood Avenue, stated that with the pending situation in Saudi Arabia, he would like to have the Salute to our Flag.

Mayor Gonzales led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

Mayor Gonzales requested a moment of silence be observed with a prayer for peace.

MAVOR AND COUNCTL TTEMS:

Resolutions
Mayor Gonzales read in full a Resolution of Congratulations on behalf of CONGREGATION EMANU EL and their 100 Anniversary Celebration.

PUBLIC HEARINGS: ,
C. D. B. G.

Res. No. R- 6- 91
2 J AN

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Mayor Gonzales declared the Public Hearing open.

City Clerk Ramos submitted the Affidavit of Publication and reported that no protests or objections had been received.

Community Development Director Aguilera reported on the Priority List for the 1991- 92 Community Development Block Grant Projects per the Cooperating Cities Agreement with San Bernardino County. Mr. Aguilera advised Colton has been allocated approximately $ 180, 000 in CDBG Funds, which will be allocated as follows:

1. Street Improvements ( curb, gutter and sidewalk) in Census Tract 69, South Colton - $ 87, 000

2. Graffiti Eradication Program - $ 30, 000

3. Senior Outreach Program - $ 20, 000

4. Youth Intervention Program - $ 25, 000

5. Contingency Fund ( 10% of total allocation must be withheld for con- tingencies) - $ 18, 000
Mr. Aguilera concluded if Council concurs with allocations for the Priority List of 1991- 92 Community Development Block Grant Funds Projects, adoption of Resolution No. R- 6- 91 would be in order.

Mayor Gonzales asked if anyone present desired to speak on this matter.

Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Roman, to close the Public Hearing. Unanimous vote.

Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Roman, to adopt Resolution No. R- 6- 91. Unanimous vote.

RESOLUTION NO. R- 6- 91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF COLTON, PRIORITIZING THE TYPES OF PROJECTS

TO BE FUNDED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991- 92.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR" S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

Reche Canyon Specific Plan
Community Development Director Aguilera advised the Planning Commission again reviewed the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, as requested by the City Council, in particular with the recommendations concerning the commer- cial development in the Canyon, and the Commission has recommended that the commercial zoning remain as originally designated. Mr. Aguilera said there were also 25 conditions of approval, which he read. Mr.

Aguilera stated part of the Commissions' recommendations included mov- ing the Cooley House into Reche Canyon and utilizing the structure as both commercial and residential, with the proposed commercial center.

Mr. Aguilera advised the developer of the commercial center has agreed 3 JAN 1 5 1991

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) to dedicate 2 acres to be used as a park site, fronting on Prado Lane, and the Trail Riders Association of Reche Canyon has also offered to dedicate 2 acres for a park site, for a total of 4 acres of park land, which could be developed, maintained and paid by a community facilities district.

Mr. Aguilera continued the Kencor Corporation property would be excluded from the Specific Plan, however, the Relco property would be included in the Specific Plan, per the opinion of Legal Counsel.

Mr. Aguilera concluded the recommendation would then be to approve the Specific Plan as originally submitted, with the 25 conditions as out- lined #' exclude the Kencor Corporation property and include the Relco property, and pass First Reading of Ordinance No. 0- 18- 90 and the EIR.

Pastor Peter A. Michas, 3015 Shadid Drive, Colton, asked that those residents desiring to speak on the Reche Canyon Specific Plan issue do so in a respectful and courteous manner.

Speaking in opposition to the commercial zoning and commercial develop- ment in the Canyon, because it was not warranted and it would add to an already congested traffic situation, were:

Mr. Robert Sparks, 3029 Prado Lane, Colton
Mr. Mark Williams, 3011 Shadid Drive, Colton
Mr. Louis Behrends, 12640 Reche Canyon Road, Colton
Mr. Andy Gunn, 3017 Shadid Drive, Colton
Mrs. Alicia Jackson, 3030 Canyon Vista Drive, Colton - who read a state- ment in full on behalf of residents of Emerald Point Townhomes. speaking in favor of the commercial center and commercial development in the Canyon were:

Mr. Gary Jackson, 1355 Running Creek Drive, Upland - the developer of the proposed commercial center.

Mrs. Geri Farris, 7841 Reche Canyon Road, Colton
Mrs. Tricia Ruminski, 3012 Shadid Drive, Colton
Mayor Gonzales referred to a letter from Matthew M. and Victoria A.

Peunic, Jr., opposing commercial development in the Canyon.

City Clerk Ramos stated a petition has been submitted! containing 35 pages with approximately 11 names per page, opposing the commercial zoning and development in Reche Canyon.

Mr. Eugene P. McMeans, 2025 South Glenwood Drive, asked if the minimum half - acre lots will be retained, and if an EIR on the Kencor property will be done.

Mr. Aguilera replied the half - acre minimum lots have been retained, and an EIR has been done.
4 1,99t

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Mr. McMeans stated he has no actual opinion on the commercial for the Canyon, however, he could see that there may be needs for this in the future. Mr. McMeans stated he would like to see the City come up with a density wherein the residents of the Canyon could retain their life styles.

The majority of Councilmembers were in agreement to approve Staff' s recommendations, with the exclusion of the commercial zoning and de- velopment.

After brief discussion, moved by Mayor Gonzales, seconded by Council- woman Cisneros, to approve Staff' s recommendations with regard to the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, excluding the commercial zoning, and pass First Reading of Ordinance No. 0- 18- 90, and waive full reading. Vote was unanimous.

ORDINANCE NO. 0- 18- 90 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLTON CITY COUNCIL First Reading) AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1602, ADDING SECTION

18. 12. 158 TO CREATE THE RECHE CANYON SPECIFIC
PLAN KNOWN AS FILE NO. D- 60- 90, ALSO APPROVING

OF, AND ACCEPTING AS COMPLETE, THE RECHE CANYON
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.

Recess
The City Council recessed at 9: 20 p. m., and reconvened at 9: 35 p. m., all Members present.

CITY MANAGER' S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

PA- rRnnnR1
City Manager Edmund Sotelo reported from his memorandum regarding adop- tion of a new Job Description for Finance Director and amending the City' s Pay and Classification Plan by Resolution No. R- 7- 91.

Moved by Councilman Lofy, seconded by Councilman Roman, approving new Job Description for Finance Director and adopting Resolution No. R- 7-

91. Unanimous vote.

RESOLUTION NO. R- 7- 91 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. R- 49- 90.

Pprsnnnel
City Manager Sotelo reported on a reclassification from Building Main- tenance Leadworker to Building Maintenance supervisor, and a new Job Description which includes the additional duties, responsibilities and skills that the employee is performing.

Mr. Sotelo advised the employee and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association requested the reclassification study, which was reviewed by the Supervisor and Director of the Department.
5 1.1.b
Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Mr. Sotelo stated the new classification will remain in the General Unit of the Employees Association, and the salary range will be 5 percent above the previous classification.

Mr. Sotelo concluded Staff recommends approval of the new Job Descrip- tion for Building Maintenance Supervisor, and Resolution No. R- 8- 91, amending the City' s Pay and Classification Plan.

Moved by Councilman Roman, seconded by Councilman Lofy, to approve new Job Description for Building Maintenance Supervisor, and adopt Resolu- tion No. R- 8- 91. Unanimous vote.

RESOLUTION NO. R- 8- 91 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. R- 49- 90.

County of San Bernardino
City Manager Sotelo read a memorandum requesting the City Council' s consideration of signing a Memorandum of Understanding with the San Bernardino County Regional Parks Department, and adoption of a Reso- lution, to enter into a County - wide Park and Open Space District.

City Manager Sotelo continued the intent of the District is to aid in the funding of open space acquisition, habitat conservation and crea- tion, and operation and maintenance of new parks and facilities through a Beneficial Assessment, which would be an assessment to property owners within the District.

Mr. Sotelo stated should the City decide to be included in this District, Colton would be included in the County - wide election with other agencies that had decided to participate in the District. Adoption of the Reso- lution and signing of the M. O. U. does not constitute Colton property owners receiving the Beneficial Assessment, and a majority of the voters would be required for District formation.

Mr. Sotelo advised the proposed Beneficial Assessment for each parcel is $ 36. 00, and the revenue generated in the District is proposed to be divided 50/ 50 with the County, after the Auditor/ Controller Fee and District Disbursement Fee.

Mr. Sotelo stated in light of the State Grants Program not being avail- able due to the failure of last November' s Park Bond Measure on the State- wide ballot, and due to Park Development Fees being a limited future resource for funding future park and facility creation, and operation and maintenance of same, the City needs to have available new programs that can fill the void that will be left when the exist- ing funding mechanisms have been exhausted.

Mr. Sotelo concluded Staff recommends the City Council adopt the Resolu- tion to enter the San Bernardino County Regional Parks and Open Space District, and sign the Memorandum of Understanding.

Mrs. Beverly Bentley, 1150 South Meadow Lane, spoke against the open space assessment district and requested that the City not sign the 6 JAN 1 5 1991

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) M. O. U. with the County. Mrs. Bentley stated this is a form of double taxation, and the citizens of Colton do not need this.

Mr. Eugene P. McMeans, 2025 South Glenwood Avenue, also spoke in oppo- sition to this assessment district, stating he felt the money would not benefit the City of Colton as it is proposed, and possibly the City can come up with their own proposal.

Mrs. Clare Jean Smith, 11794 Reche Canyon Road, spoke in favor of the open space assessment district, stating she felt it would definitely benefit Colton, and the people should be allowed to decide for them- selves on this issue. Mrs. Smith said she would like to see this issue go on the ballot.

Mr. Arthur T. Milian, Field Representative for the Office of Supervisor Barbara Cram Riordan, County Board of supervisors, referred to a letter from Supervisor Riordan supporting the open space assessment district, and was hopeful that the City of Colton would favorably consider this issue.

Mr. Steve Messerli, representing the San Bernardino County Regional Parks Department, spoke to the Councilmembers on the open space assessment district, urging the City Council to enter into the park and open space district as it will benefit the City and Colton would receive 50 percent of funds for park development.

After additional discussion, moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Lofy, to table this matter to a future date. Vote was unanimous.

Auto Center
City Manager Sotelo referred to a memorandum, and letter from Mr. Jim Lamparter, of Oremor Management and Investment Company, regarding the feasibility of locating an Auto Center in the City of Colton.

Mr. Sotelo continued as Council is aware, cities can benefit from auto- mobile dealerships due to the substantial sales tax generated. Mr.

Sotelo said Mr. Lamparter has submitted a proposal to do such a study for the City of Colton at a cost of $ 12, 000, payable at $ 6, 000 to begin the study and $ 6, 000 at the completion of the study.

Mr. Sotelo concluded Staff recommends Council approve the proposal from Mr. Lamparter, allowing him to begin his Study and Action Plan in de- veloping an Auto Center in our City.

Councilwoman Cisneros felt the City has Staff capable of doing such a study.

Moved by Councilman Lofy, seconded by Mayor Gonzales, approving and authorizing Oremor Management and Investment Company to do a Study and Action Plan in developing an Auto Center in Colton, not to exceed 12, 000. Motion carried, with Councilwoman Cisneros voting NO. 7 ;---

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Mr. Jim Lamparter, Executive Vice - President, Oremor Management & In- vestment Company, spoke to the Councilmembers regarding the proposed study, which would be completed within thirty days. Mr. Lamparter said he knew of other cities that tried doing their own studies and they ran into serious problems and difficulties. Mr. Lamparter said his company has the expertise and experience in these matters, and they could do a good job for the City of Colton.

Closed Session
City Manager Sotelo requested a Closed Session, for Personnel Matters and Litigation, at the end of the Meeting.

Recess
The City Council recessed at 10: 25 p. m., to take up the business of the Redevelopment Agency for the City of Colton, and reconvened at 10: 26 p. m., all Members present.

CLOSED SESSION:

The City Council adjourned to Closed Session at 10: 26 p. m., to discuss Personnel Matters, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, and Liti- gation, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956. 9( a), and reconvened at 10: 53 p. m., all Members present.

Personnel
The City Council ratified the Contract with Mr. Karl Gaytan for Director of Parks, Recreation and Human Services.

The City Council authorized an amendment to the Contract with Margaret Ramos, Executive Assistant, for a 6. 8% Equity Adjustment, and the C. P. I. salary increase.

V.1011 Orl kllw 009F
Moved by Councilman Roman, seconded by Councilman Lofy and unanimously passed, Mayor Gonzales adjourned the meeting at 10: 55 p. m.

HELEN A. RAMOS, CMC
City Clerk
City of Colton
8 JAN 1 5 1991

1.1.b
Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: Attachment 2_1-15-1991_Reche Canyon SP_Commercial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

City of Colton
Reche Canyon Traffic AD-HOC
Committee
January 25, 2024
5:00 PM
City Hall Council Chambers-650 N. La Cadena

1 Meeting Minutes

A. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 5:02 p.m.

Members Attending: Mayor Frank Navarro (Chair), Council Member John Echevarria, Dr. Eric Peters, Jacqueline Maypray-Fitch, and Richard Banasiak. Dr. Manzoor Massey (Vice Chair) and Planning Commissioner Richard Prieto were absent.

B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes from February 11, 2021 meeting were approved unanimously; motioned by Richard Banasiak and 2nd by Jacqueline Maypray-Fitch.

C. PUBLIC COMMENT
None

D. BUSINESS ITEMS / ACTION ITEMS
Introduction of newly appointed members to the Ad-Hoc Committee a. Jacqueline Maypray-Fitch (Sworn by Deputy City Clerk, Stephanie M. Vargas, prior to the meeting)
b. Dr. Eric Peters
c. Planning Commissioner Richard Prieto

STAFF PRESENT:

Brian Dickerson, Director of Public Works and Utility Services Victor Ortiz, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Moises Peralta, Associate Engineer
Mario Suarez, AICP, Interim Director/Planning Manager

E. OLD BUSINESS
None

F. COMMITTEE DISCUSSION

1. Tentative Tract map No. 16798 – Iron Horse Hills Subdivision – 184 Single family detached residential units with parks and open space on 119.6 acre lot.

Main entrance of the tract is located along Barton Road. • Victor introduced the item approved in 2006.
• Mario presented the item.
• Alejandro Tapia with Michael Baker International (MBI) discussed the Traffic Impact Analysis
• Alicia Gonzalez with MBI discussed the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) on the project.
• Richard asked why removal of the Water Tank and traded for the water well.

1.1.c
Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: Attachment 3_Draft Meeting Minutes of the Reche Canyon Traffic Ad-Hoc Committee_01-25-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial

City of Colton
Reche Canyon Traffic AD-HOC
Committee
January 25, 2024
5:00 PM
City Hall Council Chambers-650 N. La Cadena

2 • Brandon Barnett with MBI responded to Richard’s question and Brian further clarified the City is 100% groundwater reliant.
• Richard requested clarification and clarification was provided that Barton Road at “Street A” is the project’s primary access and “Street A” at Westwood St. is strictly a Secondary Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) point. • Dr. Peters asked if “Street A” is a planned arterial as determined by the City not developers, Victor clarified the connection of “Street A” at Reche Canyon Rd. is within the County of San Bernardino jurisdiction. • Dr. Peters asked if the Traffic Study dated 2005 is out of date. MBI indicated that based on project’s traffic trip generation, 15% of project traffic would be added from the development onto the Reche Canyon Road, on which Dr.

Peters indicated 15% is a lot.
• Alejandro indicated the original study assumed 30 vehicles would be traveling north and south on Reche Canyon Rd.
• Mayor Navarro expressed his disagreement with the Traffic Study since it is 19 years old.
• Mario requested MBI to explain technically why it is a challenge to update the existing Traffic Study of which Alicia confirmed the Traffic Study would not be significant.
• Dr. Peters asked if no analysis was done on the connection at “Street A.” • Dr. Peters asked if the Traffic Signal upgrade at Reche Canyon Rd and Washington St. as well as the signing and striping requirements indicated in the Traffic Study are still needed.
• Victor clarified the Traffic Signal at Center Dr./Washington St. does not exist. • Dr. Peters asked if the Traffic Signal at Reche Canyon Rd./Washington St. is a level of service classified as A, B, C, D, E, or F to which Victor responded that it was probable D or worse.
• Richard suggested to relocate the existing Bus Stop at Reche Canyon Rd. & Washington St. easterly to use the “Bus lane” as a drivable lane. • Victor indicated the problem is within the County of San Bernardino right-of- way forcing two lanes to be pinched into one lane in each direction causing a bottleneck.
• Richard reiterated the problem is at the County side. • Dr. Peters discovered the problem is the “bottleneck” at the County side. • Victor indicated Staff can reach out to the County and that Hunts Lane to Cooley Drive traffic signal are synchronized or communicating with each other.
• Mario reiterated Staff would write down and list the concerns from the Traffic Committee to the Planning Commission.
• Council Member (CM) Echevarria questioned the permanent blockage at Street A and Westwood St.
• Mario responded it would have to be a gate with a Knox box for the Fire Department to access.

1.1.c
Packet Pg. 111
Attachment: Attachment 3_Draft Meeting Minutes of the Reche Canyon Traffic Ad-Hoc Committee_01-25-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial

City of Colton
Reche Canyon Traffic AD-HOC
Committee
January 25, 2024
5:00 PM
City Hall Council Chambers-650 N. La Cadena

3 • Alejandro indicated the Traffic Signal Plans have not been designed; however, will work with the City on coordination and potential synchronization. • Jacqueline indicated 2006 study is so outdated.
• Alejandro indicated because of CEQA, the City is not required to do an updated addendum.
• Mayor Navarro asked about internal streets
• Brandon confirmed two lanes in each direction per the Reche Canyon Specific Plan.
• Manuel Mancha spoke in favor of the project.
• Mario summarized the Ad-Hoc Committee’s concerns as the following:
▪ Concern about 2006 EIR data being too old and the recent Addendum did not take into account recent traffic counts.
▪
• Look at timing of signals with the County of San Bernardino along Reche Canyon Drive.
• Review possible addition right turn lane at the intersection of Reche Canyon Drive and East Washington traveling east.
▪ Bottleneck at the County portion of Reche Canyon Dr.

2. Reche Canyon Plaza – Commercial development with gasoline station, car wash, convenience store, and retail spaces. Access entrances are along Reche Canyon Rd. and Old Reche Canyon Rd.
• Mario provided a brief background on project, clarified County vs. City sides of the public right-of-way. (Presentation)
• LSA Traffic Engineer – Study analyzed project frontage, explained left turn at Shadid Dr., Traffic Findings in Level of Service (LOS) and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
• Richard – Traffic is already a problem, how is Old Reche Canyon Rd. Traffic Signal to connect or conflict with Shane Dr. or any other signals or intersection?
• Richard – has three (4) key points/questions as follows:
▪ Synchronization
▪ Signalization
▪ Line-of-sight
▪ Retention Basin and drainage in Old Reche Canyon Drive • Mario provided an explanation
• Richard asked when would the Traffic Signal at Crystal Ridge Ln. be completed, to which Mario indicated it is a requirement at project opening. • David Mlynarski (Transtech) – provide brief background on the project and how it would aid the neighboring community, especially at the north end termination of Old Reche Canyon Rd. where vehicles would no longer be able to cut across onto Reche Canyn Rd.

1.1.c
Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: Attachment 3_Draft Meeting Minutes of the Reche Canyon Traffic Ad-Hoc Committee_01-25-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial

City of Colton
Reche Canyon Traffic AD-HOC
Committee
January 25, 2024
5:00 PM
City Hall Council Chambers-650 N. La Cadena

4 • Mayor Navarro – suggested a weaving lane similar to those existing along Reche Canyon Rd. north of Westwood St.
• Mario confirmed Planning Staff has not made a recommendation on the project. Planning is listening to the public and to the applicant. • Dr. Peters expressed his concerns for people not following the rules of the road and safety.
• Richard stated he is not against the project, but the project seemed so out of place and drastic.
• David indicated the project is within the height of standard and less than residential home standard height of 35 feet.
• CM Echevarria stated the small business interest in the development. • Mario – brought up pedestrian traffic perspective.
• Richard – brought up equestrian traffic.
• Dr. Peters – referenced the Reche Canyon Specific Plan, equestrian path, asked where’s the equestrian path.

G. NEXT MEETING DATE
The next meeting of the Reche Canyon Traffic Ad-Hoc Committee is not set.

H. ADJOURNMENT - Meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m.

1.1.c
Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: Attachment 3_Draft Meeting Minutes of the Reche Canyon Traffic Ad-Hoc Committee_01-25-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial

CITY OF COLTON

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

MEETING MINUTES

COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 650 NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE, COLTON, CA 92324 REGULAR MEETING –TUESDAY, JUNE 11, 2024 – 5:30 P.M.

A. CALL TO ORDER at 5:30 p.m.

B. ROLL CALL

Present
Richard Prieto
Adrianna Escarcega
Leticia (“Tish”) Baden
Dr. Eric Peters
Gary Grossich

Commissioners Absent:
none

Staff Present:

Heidi Duron, Development Services Director
Jim Priest, City Attorney from BB&K
Daniel Lunt, Sergeant
Mario Suarez, Planning Manager
David Alvarez, Senior Planner
Jesus Guerra, Planning/Building Technician
Moises Peralta, Associate Engineer

C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Led by Commissioner Baden.

D. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES FOR

May 28, 2024, Draft Planning Commission Minutes

Motion and second by Commissioner Dr. Peters / Commissioner Escarcega Roll Call vote: Ayes: 3 Noes: 0 Absent: 0 Abstain: 2 (Grossich and Baden)

E. PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Dr. Luis Gonzalez, District 3 – Flag Day Ceremony Announcement at Fleming Park

F. BUSINESS ITEMS

Commissioners:

Richard Prieto, District 1

Adrianna Escarcega, District 2

Letitia Baden, District 3

Dr. Eric Peters, District 4

Gary Grossich, At Large

1.1.d
Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: Attachment 4_Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes_June 11, 2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2024

1. FILE INDEX NO.: DAP24-0032 SUBDIVISION TIME EXTENSION

APPLICANT: Sunmeadows, LLC, William Lo

PROPERTY OWNER: RR105* LLC

PROPERTY LOCATION: West of South La Cadena Drive and East of Old Pellisseir Road

ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: 1167-011-01; 1167-011-02; 1167-021-21; 1167-021-01; 1167- 021-05; 1167-021-22; 1167-021-23; 1167-031-18

REQUEST: One-Year Time Extension request (First Extension) for approved Tentative Tract Map No. 20041 (DAP-001-748) (“A” Map) for the division of land solely for the purpose of financing or conveying title to all or a portion of the land within the Roquet Ranch Specific Plan (RRSP). 19 total lots consisting of 12 lots for future subdivision and development, 2 lots for r ecreation, 4 open space lots and areas for dedication of right-of-way for the street network located on land area of 339.8 acres made up of 111.9 acr es of residential areas, 23 acres of recreation areas, 190.07 acres of open space areas, and 14.2 acres of street circulation areas.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project has determined that there is no possibility that the time extension request may have a significant adverse effect on the environment.

Therefore, the proposed use is exempt under Article 19, Section 15061 b. (3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

Presented by: Jesus Guerra, Planning/Building Technician

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve First Extension of Time for DAP-001-748, which will set a new expiration date of June 28, 2025. Approved Planning Commission Resolutions shall remain in effect with this one-year time extension.

PUBLIC COMMENTS:

William Lo, Applicant provided update of project.

COMMISSION ACTION
Motion and second by Commissioner Grossich / Commissioner Baden.

Roll Call vote: Ayes: 5 Noes: 0 Absent: 0 Abstain: 0

2. FILE INDEX NUMBER: HPO24-0001 NEW HOME IN HISTORIC DISTRICT

APPLICANT: Gabriel Noriega

PROPERTY OWNER: Jose B. Villasenor Rangel

PROPERTY LOCATION: 273 South 7TH Street

1.1.d
Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: Attachment 4_Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes_June 11, 2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2024

ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 0163-072-01

REQUEST: Major Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the construction of a new 1,316 square-foot single-family dwelling with an attached 434 square-foot garage on a vacant lot measuring approximately 3,750 square feet in area located in the MU-N (Mixed Use Neighborhood) Zone within the San Salvador Historic District.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Recommendation: Categorical Exemption- Class

03. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – Article 19, Categorical Exemption Section 15303(a) allows one single-family residence in a residential zone.

Presented by: Jesus Guerra, Planning/Building Technician

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested Major Certificate of Appropriateness with adoption of resolution entitled:

RESOLUTION NO. R- 09-24. A RESOLUTION OF THE OF THE CITY OF COLTON

PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING MAJOR CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 1,316 SQUARE- FOOT SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 434 SQUARE -FOOT GARAGE LOCATED AT 2 73 S 7 th STREET WITHIN THE MU -N (MIXED-USE NEIGHBORHOOD) ZONE AND SAN SALVADOR HISTORIC DISTRICT. (FILE INDEX NO. HPO24-0001).

PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Gabriel Noriega, Applicant

COMMISSION ACTION
Motion and second by Commissioner Escarcega / Commissioner Baden.

Roll Call vote: Ayes: 5 Noes: 0 Absent: 0 Abstain: 0

G. PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. FILE INDEX NUMBER : DAP-001-453 RECHE CANYON DEVELOPMENT

APPLICANT: Fahim S. Tanios

PROPERTY OWNER: Fahim S. Tanios

PROPERTY LOCATION: 2501 Reche Canyon Drive and 645 South 7th Street

ASSESSORS PARCEL MAP NUMBERS: 0284-211-70, 71, 72; 1178-371-27; 0163-172-48

REQUEST: Request for a General Plan Amendment to change existing Land Use from General Commercial to Mixed-Use Downtown and Change of Zone from C -2 (General Commercial) to

1.1.d
Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: Attachment 4_Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes_June 11, 2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2024

M-U-D (Mixed-Use Downtown) at 645 S. 7th Street, approval of an Amendment to the Reche Canyon Specific Plan to change the onsite land use designation from Estate Density (Residential) to Commercial, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 24- hour, gasoline service station, drive - through car wash, and convenience store, and an Architectural and Site Plan Review to approve the site plan, site improvements, landscaping plans, and architectural elevations for the proposed retail sales (indoors), convenience store, and gasoline service station with drive-through car wash on property measuring approximately 2.90 acres located at 2501 Reche Canyon Road.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR), State Clearinghouse No. 2019039115, with appropriate findings and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pursuant to Section 15070 and 15074 of the Guidelines of the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Presented by: Mario Suarez, Planning Manager and William Priest, City Attorney went over alternative recommendation to deny the project, but provide possible conditions of approval should the City Council approve the project.

Planning Manager Suarez presented two additional emails received by staff from Pierre Gomez and Kimberly Watkins and noted also sending the Commission emails from residents opposing the project and email from applicant with persons supporting the project.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends consideration of the following Planning Commission Resolutions or providing staff with alternative direction:

RESOLUTION NO. R- 10-24. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING

COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

COLTON CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE # 2019039115) FOR THE RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT;

ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM. (FILE INDEX NUMBER DAP-001-453)

RESOLUTION NO. R- 11-24. A RESOLUTION OF THE OF THE CITY OF COLTON

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE

APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE RECHE CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN TO

CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM ESTATE DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL) TO COMMERCIAL (FILE INDEX NO: DAP-001-453).

RESOLUTION NO. R-12-24. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF

THE CITY OF COLTON RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON AMEND SECTION 18.06.020 (OFFICIAL ZONING MAP) CHANGING PARCEL 0163-172-48 FROM C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO M-U/D (MIXED-USE DOWNTOWN) AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT CHANGING THE LAND USE OF PARCEL 0163 -172-48 FROM

1.1.d
Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: Attachment 4_Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes_June 11, 2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2024

GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED- USE DOWNTOWN. (FILE INDEX DAP -001- 453).

RESOLUTION NO. R-13-24. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF COLTON PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (DAP -001-453) TO ALLOW A 24 -HOUR, GASOLINE SERVICE STATION, DRIVE -THROUGH CAR

WASH, AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AND AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE PLAN

REVIEW TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN, SITE IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING

PLANS, AND ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED RETAIL

SALES (INDOORS), CONVENIENCE STORE, AND GASOLINE SERVICE STATION

WITH DRIVE -THROUGH CAR WASH ON PROPERTY MEASURING
APPROXIMATELY 2.90 ACRES LOCATED AT 2501 RECHE CANYON ROAD. (FILE INDEX NO. DAP-001-453)

PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Oposing Project:

Artuo C., Resident Marie Russell, Resident Richard Barrasiah, Resident Claudia Torres, Resident Amanda Werner, Resident Cathy Ludwig, Resident Emily Shin, Resident Elizabeth King, Resident Jill Sewell, Resident Epimnio Roman, Resident Charles Licop, Resident David Frezellym Resident Diana Roman, Resident Debra Karr, Resident William Gause, Resident Sam, Resident Sylvie Wellhoosen, Resident Brenda Castaneda, Resident Karen Cruznueva, Resident Juan Hueha, Resident Robert Lewis, Resident Melody Chia, Resident
Supporting Project - None

Commission Member Dr. Peters: Does not support 24- hour store, change hours from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., increase number of electric vehicle charging stations to equal the same amount of gas pump stations, and does not believe that the commercial land use is in the right place for the area.

Vice Chair Grossich indicated that he concurred on several issues with what Dr. Peters said including time constraints, a police substation, capture tax revenues to be used in Reche Canyon, the Specific Plan needs to be updated, and thinks that this partic ular location would be a difficult location for an estate density because of the automobile traffic

Commissioner Escarcega noted as being in the middle of making a decision. She found it challenging to get funding to improve areas in locations such as this one and understands this project is a packaged deal. At this time, she doesn’t believe this project is the best project for the area.

COMMISSION ACTION
Motion by Commissioner Dr. Peters recommend Denial of the project for the reasons stated on recordy / Commissioner Prieto seconded.

Roll Call vote: Ayes: 4 Noes: 1 (Grossich) Absent: 0 Abstain: 0

H. DIRECTOR’S REMARKS/REVIEW OF CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS

1.1.d
Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: Attachment 4_Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes_June 11, 2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2024

• Update regarding the June 4, 2024 City Council meeting: City Council granted the appeal of the Ecology Facility request for 35- feet storage height and approved amendement to Club 215 billboard agreement as recommended by this Planning Commission. • Update regarding the upcoming June 18, 2024 City Council meeting will hear the Cultural Resources Element as recommended by this Planning Commission.

I. COMMISSION COMMENTS

COMMISSIONER RICHARD PRIETO
• Thanked staff.
• Proud of residents for their comments and attending the meeting.

COMMISSIONER ADRIANNA ESCARCEGA
• Thanked everyone who came out and spoke.
• Looks forward to seeing what happens with the Reche Canyon Project.

COMMISSIONER LETITIA BADEN
• Thanked staff for hard work.
• Announced 5th Grand Child birth with apologies, which is the reason why she had to miss the last Commission meeting.

COMMISSIONER DR. ERIC PETERS
• Thanked residents for coming out to the meeting and expressing their opinions.

COMMISSIONER GARY GROSSICH
• Thanked the community for coming out to the meeting.
• Announced Rancho Del Prado Withdrew their Project.
• Would like to adjourn the meeting in honor of Richard Amador.

J. ADJOURNMENT
Chair requested a moment of silence in honor of Ricard Amador.

Motion to adjourn by Commissioner Escarcega.

Meeting adjourned at 9:29 p.m.

Next Scheduled Meeting: Tuesday, June 25, 2024.

Documents Related to Open Session Agendas (SB 343). Any public record, relating to an open session agenda item, that is distributed within 72 hours prior to the meeting is available for public inspection Monday through Thursday 7:30 am to 5:00 p.m. at the City of Colton Development Services Department located at the Civic Center Annex (across the street from City Hall) at 659 N. La Cadena Drive, Colton, CA 92324. The meeting will be an in- person meeting and comments via telephone or zoom will not be available.

Appeal of Planning Commission Action. If you challenge in court any action of the Planning Commission related to a public hearing item, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or

1.1.d
Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: Attachment 4_Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes_June 11, 2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2024

someone else has raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. A decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. An appeal must be filed within ten (10) days following the appellant’s receipt of notice of the action.

ADA Compliance. In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a Planning Commission Meeting, please contact the Planning Division at 909-370-5079. Notification forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

1.1.d
Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: Attachment 4_Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes_June 11, 2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

RESOLUTION NO. R-11-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE OF THE CITY OF COLTO N PLANNING

COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE

DENY OF A N A MENDMENT TO THE RECHI CANYON SPECIFIC

PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM ESTATE
DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL) TO COMMER CIAL (FILE INDEX NO:

DAP-001-453).

WHEREAS, local governments are authorized by Government Code section 65350 et seq. to prepare, adopt and amend general plans; and

WHEREAS, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment will change the land use designation from Estate Density (Residential) to Commercial for property located at 2501 Reche Canyon Road Assessor Parcel Numbers 0284-211-70, 71, 72; 1178-371-27; and

WHEREAS, the staff report accompanying this resolution is found to be true, adopted as Findings and incorporated in this resolution; and

WHEREAS, the Specific Plan Amendment was reviewed, studied, and found to comply with the California Environ mental Quality Act (“CEQA”) ; however, the project is being recommended for denial as an inappropriate land use c hange to the Reche Canyon Specific Plan based on land use compatibility based on area location, noise, light and glare added to the area, and further traffic slowdown of Reche Canyon Road with the installation of two additional traffic signals as recommend ed by the Draft/Final EIR for the Project , and proposed 24 -hour store operations; and

WHEREAS, on June 11, 2024 , the Planning Commission of the City of Colton (“Planning Commission”) held a duly noticed public hearing at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the application were heard and the application was fully examined.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COLTON:

SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission of the City of Colton, all written and oral evidence presented has been considered and reviewed , and the Commission finds that the Specific Plan Amendment request is not appropriate land use change for the area originally approved for residential development inclu ding further traffic delays to the area with the installation of two additional traffic signals to the area and that the project will not promote the public health, safety and welfare by construction of a commercial project on the subject property. Other areas of conce rns included added noise and lighting to a neighborhood surrounded by low density residential development.

SECTION 2. The Specific Plan Amendment is not consistent with the General Plan in its entirety, and specifically Land Use Element Go al LU-1, LU-3, LU-9 and Policies LU-5.6, LU-

9.3, and LU-9.8 that pertain to commercial .

SECTION 3. The Planning Commission of the City of Colton, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Article 3, Section 15042 has the author ity to disapprove a project; Therefore, no further action related to CEQA is required as the project was found not to be appropriate change to the Reche Canyon Specific Plan Land Use Designation

1.1.e
Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: Attachment 5_Planning Commission Reso No. R-11-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Colton Planning Commission Resolution No. R-11-24
DAP-001-453 – Specific Plan Amendment (Reche Canyon Specific Plan) June 11, 2024 – Page 2 of 2

from Estate Density to Commercial.

SECTION 4. Based upon the findings set forth in Sections 1 and 2 of this Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends denial to the City Council of the Specific Plan Amendment as presented to the Commission (Exhibit A).

SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of June 2024.

Richard Prieto,
Planning Commission Chairperson

ATTEST:

Planning Commission Secretary
Heidi Duron, Development Services Director

I hereby certify that th e foregoing is a true copy of a Resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Colton at a meeting held on June 11, 2024, by the following vote of the Planning Commission:

AYES: Peters, Prieto, Escarcega, Baden
NOES: Grossich
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

Planning Commission Secretary
Heidi Duron, Development Services Director

1.1.e
Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: Attachment 5_Planning Commission Reso No. R-11-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 124
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

1.1.f
Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: Attachment 6_Correspondence from Applicant_In Favor of Project_6-10-24 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 1 Mario Suarez
From: Dean Kent <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 9:52 PM
To: Mario Suarez
Subject: Proposed development in Reche Canyon
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organizaƟon. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern,

I am a long Ɵme resident of Reche Canyon, living on Prado Ln for the past 30+ years. Traffic has always been an issue, but over Ɵme it has become increasingly worse, parƟcularly during 'rush hour' - which actually lasts about 3-4 hours on Reche Canyon Rd. I believe that part of the reason is that residents need to leave and return in order to shop or get food. The worst part is the entrance to the canyon from Washington Blvd, where traffic merges from two lanes into one and causes traffic to back up for miles along Washington. I usually will not leave my home between 2pm and 7pm because of the difficulty of geƫng back home. I have been working from home since about 2006, so I am usually busy in the mornings and early aŌernoon. That means I oŌen have to wait unƟl aŌer 7pm to shop, get gas/food/etc. which is extremely inconvenient.

There is a proposed development for Reche Canyon near where the old post office, restaurant and market were. This development project would provide shopping and gas in the canyon, such that leaving and returning to my house would be much easier. I personally would like to see this development approved and completed for this reason.

Thank you for your Ɵme and consideraƟon,

Dean Kent

3077 Prado Ln, Colton

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 1 Mario Suarez
From: Kim Sutton <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 10:53 AM
To: Mario Suarez
Subject: Reche Canyon Specific Plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organizaƟon. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Mr. Suarez,
We oppose the change of zone from residenƟal to commercial on the Reche Canyon Specific Plan.

The traffic is horrendous now and will grow immensely with added ameniƟes like a car wash and gas staƟon. This is not needed in the canyon. Noise polluƟon and possible loitering and theŌ could be an issue too.

Sincerely,
John and Kim SuƩon
Sent from my iPhone

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 1 Mario Suarez
From: Nicolle Pitt <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2024 5:55 PM
To: Mario Suarez
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Tanios project
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organizaƟon. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 9, 2024, at 5:48 PM, Nicolle PiƩ <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello Mr Suarez. I have only been living in the canyon since 2005, not as long as some others. But in hindsight it is not an ideal place to live for many reasons. It took me 45 minutes to go 1 block the other day just because the light was out at Prado. SomeƟmes RCR backs up almost to the freeway. What is the cumulaƟve cost to the driver and the environment of all those cars idling every weekday? I thought Cali was supposed to be pro-planet. ?? The daily log jam lasts unƟl Prado b/c that is the last traffic light. If a light is added at 2501, the logjam will potenƟally last unƟl there. The original zoning was assigned for many reasons, one so that residents who have no choice other than RCR to get home don’t have to spend cumulaƟve years roƫng in traffic. You have already heard all of the safety concerns: emergency access, no lane divider, burros meandering across, etc.
>
> Is this June 11 meeƟng just for show or do residents actually have any say in what happens? If Mr Tanios has more pull because of money I will not spend any more fuƟle energy “fighƟng city hall.” But in this case, the needs of the hundreds and thousands of tax-paying commuters that are gainfully employed, not to menƟon the residents, should be considered.
>
> Thank you
> N PiƩ
>

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.g
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Attachment 7_Emails Received for June 11, 2024 PC_Opposing Project (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Memorandum
To: Fahim Tanios
From: Manju Pokharel
Date: September 3, 2024
Subject: Reche Canyon Plaza - Fiscal Revenue Analysis
Fahim Tanios (“Developer”) owns a 2.67-acre site that is proposed to be developed with commercial land use (“Proposed Land Use”) called Reche Canyon Plaza (“Project”) located in the City of Colton (“City”). The Proposed Land Use consists of retail space , automated car wash, convenience store and a gas station.

This Fiscal Revenue Analysis (“FRA”) has been prepared to estimate the annual General Fund revenue generated by the Proposed Land Use at build-out compared to the General Fund generated by the Existing Vacant Land . The FRA uses a combination of (i) Case Study Method and (ii) Average Costing Method to estimate the revenue.

Case Study Method: When projecting fiscal impacts using a case study method, the FIA determines the impacts of the Project’s population on the City. Case studies rely on communication with public officials, review of the City Annual Budget to assess plans to expand or maintain local services, and then determine categories of either excess or deficient service capacity.

Average Costing Method: When projecting fiscal impacts using an average costing method, the FIA determines per capita/employee impacts by applying the appropriate per capita, per employee and per capita and employee factors (“Factors”) to the Project land use assumptions. The Factors were calculated using the City of Colton Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 202 4-25 (“Budget”). Factors are projected in 2024 dollars.

1.1.h
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Attachment 8_Applicant's_Fiscal Revenue Analysis_9.3.2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) General Fund Revenue:

The annual General Fund revenues calculated using the Case Study Method as well as the Average Costing Method for Proposed Land Use at Build-out and Existing Vacant Land are as follows:

Revenue Category Proposed Land Use Vacant Land
Case Study Method:

Property Tax $ 14,406 $ 422
Property Tax in Lieu of VLF 12,041 352
Sales and Use Tax 68,188 -
Sales Tax – Measure S 61,709 -
Average Costing Method:

Franchises 650 -
Other Taxes 317 -
Licenses and Permits 330 -
Fines and Forfeitures 76 -
Use of Money and Property 246 -
Revenue from Other Agencies 201 -
Charges for Current Services 449 -
General Fund Transfer - -
Other Financing Sources 265 -
Total General Fund Revenue $ 158,877 $ 774
The reader should be aware that the FRA contains estimates or projections of the Proposed Project’s future revenue and actual revenue may vary from estimates because events and circumstances may occur in a manner that is different than projected in the FRA.

Fiscal Revenue Analysis – Exhibits
The FRA Exhibits as organized as follows:

Exhibit Table Page No. Description
A 1 3 Fiscal Revenue Analysis Summary
A 2 4 Post ERAF Share of 1%
A 3 5 Land Use Assumptions
A 4 6 Property Tax Calculation
A 5 7 Property Tax In Lieu of VLF
A 6 8 Sales Tax Calculation
A 7 9 General Fund Revenue Summary

1.1.h
Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Attachment 8_Applicant's_Fiscal Revenue Analysis_9.3.2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Exhibit A
Fahim Tanios
Reche Canyon Plaza
City of Colton
Table 1 - Fiscal Revenue Analysis Summary
September 03, 2024
General Fund Revenue:

Table
Ref.

Proposed
Land Use Vacant Land
Property Taxes 4 14,406$ 422$
VLF - Property Taxes 5 12,041 352
Franchises 7 650 -
Sales & Use Tax 6 68,188 -
Sales Tax - Measure S 6 61,709 -
Other Taxes 7 317 -
License and Permits 7 330 -
Fines and Forfeitures 7 76 -
Use of Money and Property 7 246 -
Revenue from Other Agencies 7 201 -
Charges for Current Services 7 449 -
General Fund Transfer 7 - -
Other Financing Sources 7 265 -
Total General Fund Revenue 158,877$ 774$

1.1.h
Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: Attachment 8_Applicant's_Fiscal Revenue Analysis_9.3.2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Exhibit A
Fahim Tanios
Reche Canyon Plaza
City of Colton
Table 2 - Post ERAF Share of 1%
September 03, 2024
Weighted
Agency Code Agency (b) 2008 2021 Average (c)
AB01 GA01 County General Fund 15.472917% 15.466324% 15.468275% AB02 GA01 Education Revenue Augmentation Fund 23.433562% 23.423573% 23.426529% BF02 GA01 Flood Control Zone 2 2.747652% 2.746368% 2.746748% BF07 GA01 Flood Control Admin 1 & 2 0.193005% 0.192917% 0.192943% BS01 GA01 Superintendent of Schools 0.531014% 0.530786% 0.530853% BS01 GA05 Superintendent of Schools 0.054853% 0.054831% 0.054838% BS01 GA03 Superintendent of Schools 0.209262% 0.209173% 0.209199% CC10 GA01 City of Colton 16.795017% 16.787347% 16.789616% SC54 GA01 San Bernardino Community College 5.443025% 5.440538% 5.441274% SU20 GA01 Colton Joint Unified School District 32.282111% 32.267318% 32.271695% WR01 GL01 Riverside Corona RCD 0.037711% 0.082233% 0.069060% WU23 GA01 San Bernandino Valley Muni Water 2.799871% 2.798592% 2.798970% Total 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000%
Acres (d) 0.79 1.88 2.67
% of Total 29.59% 70.41% 100.00%
Footnotes:

Source: San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller's Office. (d) Acreage per Landvision.
(b) Shares of the basic tax that are received by the City for its General Fund for each tax rate area are highlighted in bold print.
(c) For purposes of the analysis, the weighted average tax rates were calculated based on the acreage of the TRAs within the Project.

Tax Rate Area (a)
(a) In addition to other ad valorem charges imposed by various local agencies, land owners in California are required to pay annual property taxes of 1% on the assessed value of their property pursuant to Proposition 13. Each County in California is divided into tax rate areas ("TRA"). After the basic 1% property tax is collected by the county, the tax is allocated to various local agencies based on each agency’s share of the basic tax within the property’s applicable TRA. This exhibit shows the share of the basic tax applicable to the Project's TRA.

1.1.h
Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: Attachment 8_Applicant's_Fiscal Revenue Analysis_9.3.2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Exhibit A
Fahim Tanios
Reche Canyon Plaza
City of Colton
Table 3 - Land Use Assumptions
September 03, 2024
Assessed Value Total Assessed
Total SF (a) Per SF (a) Value
A. Proposed Land Use
Retail Space 9,484 300$ 2,845,200$
Automated Car Wash 2,278 550 1,252,900
Convenience Store 3,275 300 982,500
Gas Station (Pump Station) 3,500,000
Total Assessed Value 8,580,600$
# Units (a) SF/Employee (b) Total Employees
II. Employee Summary
Retail Space 9,484 350 27
Automated Car Wash 2,278 - -
Convenience Store 3,275 350 9
Gas Station (Pump Station) - - -
Total Estimated Employees 36
III. Equivalent Resident Summary Citywide (c) Project
Total Residents [1] 52,778 -
Total Employees [2] 24,200 36
Equivalent Residents [2]x50%=[3] 12,100 18
Total Equivalent Resident [1]+[3]=[4] 64,878 18
Total Assessed
B. Vacant Land Value (d)
Land 251,175$
Improvements -
Total Non-Residential Assessed Value 251,175$
Footnotes:
(a) Per the client as of 8/5/2024.
(b)
(c)
(d) Per Fiscal Year 2023-24 property tax bill.

City Population per the California Department of Finance, E-5 City/County Population and Housing Estimates as of 1/1/2024 for City of Colton. City Employment per State of California, Employment Development Department Monthly Labor Force Data for Cities and Census Designated Places as of August 2024.

SF per employee based on general industry standards and best practices observed across different industry. It is assumed that the automated car was and gas station pumps are handled by the employees at the convenience store.

1.1.h
Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: Attachment 8_Applicant's_Fiscal Revenue Analysis_9.3.2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Exhibit A
Fahim Tanios
Reche Canyon Plaza
City of Colton
Table 4 - Property Tax Calculation
September 03, 2024
Table
Ref.

A. Proposed Land Use
Assessed Value
Retail Space 3 2,845,200$
Automated Car Wash 1,252,900
Convenience Store 982,500
Gas Station (Pump Station) 3,500,000
Total Assessed Value [1] 8,580,600$
Basic Rate 1.00%
Basic Tax Paid [2]=[1]*1% 85,806$
City General Fund Share of Basic Tax (a) [3] 2 16.789616% Total Annual Property Taxes to City [4]=[2]x[3] 14,406$ B. Vacant Land
Assessed Value
Land 3 251,175$
Improvements 3 -
Total Assessed Value [5] 251,175$
Basic Rate 1.00%
Basic Tax Paid [6]=[5]*1% 2,512$
City General Fund Share of Basic Tax (a) [7] 2 16.789616% Total Annual Property Taxes to City [8]=[6]x[7] 422$
Footnotes:
(a) See Table 2 - Post ERAF share of 1%.

Property Tax

1.1.h
Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: Attachment 8_Applicant's_Fiscal Revenue Analysis_9.3.2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Exhibit A
Fahim Tanios
Reche Canyon Plaza
City of Colton
Table 5 - Property Tax in Lieu of VLF
September 03, 2024
Property Tax in lieu of VLF ("VLF")
A. Proposed Land Use
Nominal Dollars:

City Assessed Valuation (a) [1] 5,758,752,326$
Property Tax Vehicle License Fees (VLF) (b) [2] 8,081,081 VLF Increase per $1,000 increase in AV [3]=[2]/[1]*1000 1.4033$ Property Tax in Lieu of VLF:

Total Assessed Value (c) [4] 8,580,600$
Project Assessed Valuation / 1,000 [5]=[4]/1000 8,580.60$ VLF Increase per $1,000 increase in AV =[3] 1.4033
Property Tax in Lieu of VLF =[3]*[5] 12,041$
B. Vacant Land
Nominal Dollars:

City Assessed Valuation (a) [1] 5,758,752,326$
Property Tax Vehicle License Fees (VLF) (b) [2] 8,081,081 VLF Increase per $1,000 increase in AV [3]=[2]/[1]*1000 1.4033$ Property Tax in Lieu of VLF:

Total Assessed Value (c) [4] 251,175$
Project Assessed Valuation / 1,000 [5]=[4]/1000 251.18$ VLF Increase per $1,000 increase in AV =[3] 1.4033
Property Tax in Lieu of VLF =[3]*[5] 352$
Footnotes:
(a) Per San Bernardino County Assessor's Office 2024 Assessment Roll for City of Colton. (b)
(c) See Table 3 - Land Use Assumptions.

Per City of Colton Adopted Budget for fiscal year 2024-25, Page 37.

1.1.h
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Attachment 8_Applicant's_Fiscal Revenue Analysis_9.3.2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Exhibit A
Fahim Tanios
Reche Canyon Plaza
City of Colton
Table 6 - Sales Tax Calculation
September 03, 2024
Sales Tax
Table
Ref.

Total SF
(a)
Sales/SF
(b) Total Sales
On-Site Sales and Use Tax Revenue
A. Retail
Taxable Retail Space (75% of total SF) 3 7,113 200$ 1,422,600$ Automated Car Wash 2,278 - -
Convenience Store 3,275 350 1,146,250 Total Retail Taxable Sales 2,568,850$
B. Gas Station (Pump Station)
Average Gallons sold per day (a) 2,500
Average Gallons sold per year 912,500
Average Gas Price with taxes (c) 4.223$
Average Gas Price without taxes (d) 3.883$
Total Gas Station Taxable Sales 3,543,238$
Total On-site Taxable Sales 6,112,088$
Sales Tax @1% of taxable sales 1.00% 61,121$
Use Tax @10.50% of sales tax 10.50% 6,418
Total On-site Sales and Use Tax 67,539$
Total Measure S @1% of taxable sales (e) 1.00% 61,121$
Off-Site Sales and Use Tax Revenue
Total Employees 3 36
Annual Employees spending (f) 4,300
Total Taxable Sales 156,753
Taxable Sales Less 25% captured on-site 25% 117,565
Taxable Sales captured within the City 50% 58,783
Sales Tax @1% of taxable sales 1.00% 588
Use Tax @10.50% of sales tax 10.50% 62
Total On-site Sales and Use Tax 650$
Total Measure S @1% of taxable sales (e) 1.00% 588$
Total Onsite and Off-site Sales and Use Tax Revenue 68,188$ Total Onsite and Off-site Measure S Revenue 61,709$
Total Sales Tax and Measure S Revenue 129,897$
Footnotes:
(a) Per the client as of 8/5/2024. It is assumed that only 75% pf the total retail space will generate taxable sales. (b)
(c)
(d) The avergae gas price of $3.883 per gallon off all taxes but does not include the sales tax of 8.75%. (e)
(f) Per DPFG independent research and various market study prepared for compareble projects.

In addtion to the sales and use tax, City of Colton approved a 1% sales tax called Measure S on November 2022 to maintain various City services.

The avergae gas price of $4.223 per gallon consists of (i) Base price - $3.0 (ii) Federal Excise Tax - $0.184 (iii) Sate Excise Tax - $0.579 (iv) UST Fee - $0.02 (iv) Cap and Trade Cost - $0.10 and (v) sales tax of 8.75%.

Per DPFG Proprietary database of prior projects. The automated car wash will not generate any sales tax.

1.1.h
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Attachment 8_Applicant's_Fiscal Revenue Analysis_9.3.2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Exhibit A
Fahim Tanios
Reche Canyon Plaza
City of Colton
Table 7 - General Fund Revenue Summary
September 03, 2024
[1] [2] [3]=[1]*[2] [4] [3]/[4]=[5] [6] [5]X[6]
FY 2024-25 Annual Net City Project
Budget Budget Marginal General Equivalent Equivalent
Recurring Items: Revenues Page Ref. FY 2024-25 (a) Increase (b) Fund Measure (c) Units (c) Factor Units Amount General Funds
Property Taxes 37 8,272,000$ --------------------------------------- See Table 4 ------------------------------------------- 14,406$ VLF - Property Taxes 37 8,081,081 --------------------------------------- See Table 5 ------------------------------------------- 12,041 Franchises 37 2,312,600 100.00% 2,312,600 PER 64,878 35.65 18 650 Sales & Use Tax 37 11,865,600 --------------------------------------- See Table 6 ------------------------------------------- 68,188 Sales Tax - Measure S 37 10,006,000 --------------------------------------- See Table 6 ------------------------------------------- 61,709 Other Taxes 37 2,257,527 50.00% 1,128,764 PER 64,878 17.40 18 317 License and Permits 37 2,348,131 50.00% 1,174,066 PER 64,878 18.10 18 330 Fines and Forfeitures 37 538,825 50.00% 269,413 PER 64,878 4.15 18 76 Use of Money and Property 37 1,748,000 50.00% 874,000 PER 64,878 13.47 18 246 Revenue from Other Agencies 37 1,430,281 50.00% 715,141 PER 64,878 11.02 18 201 Charges for Current Services 37 3,194,657 50.00% 1,597,329 PER 64,878 24.62 18 449 General Fund Transfer 37 12,000,000 0.00% - PER 64,878 - 18 - Other Financing Sources 37 1,888,000 50.00% 944,000 PER 64,878 14.55 18 265 TOTAL REVENUES 65,942,702$ 158,877$
Footnotes:
(a) Per City of Colton Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25. "PER" = Per Equivalent Resident.
(c) Based on (1) 52,778, City of Colton residents, California Department of Finance, January 1, 2024, (2) 24,200, total City of Colton employees and (3) City employment reduced by 50% to account for the estimated less frequent use of City public services by employees than residents. (b) The marginal increase represents the impact to the City's revenue due to the nature of the revenue relative to the Project.

1.1.h
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Attachment 8_Applicant's_Fiscal Revenue Analysis_9.3.2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon 26840 Aliso Viejo Parkway, Suite 110 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 949.388.9269 DPFG.com

DPFG is a national real estate consulting firm that represents land developers and builders on many land use related matters. The firm specializes in providing land development and financing solutions in the local market for its clients which include, but are not limited to, to the following areas:

Consulting Milestones:
• Completed over 2,565 Land Secured Public Financings with over $16 billion in bonds. • Completed over 500 Fiscal Impact Analysis Reviews and Reports. • Negotiated over 350 School Mitigation Agreements.
• Completed over 150 Public Facilities Financing Reports. • Completed over 600 Project Cash Flows, Valuation and Feasibility Analysis. • Completed over 4,000 Disclosure Analysis Reviews and Reports. • Completed over 100 Redevelopment projects.
• Restructured over 100 Land Secured Public Financing Districts. • Completed over 4,000 Property Tax Appeals nationwide. • Look Back Diagnostic findings reached over $125 million.

The Management Team at DPFG has over 300 years of combined real estate experience in performing the firm’s core services and other general real estate consulting services as follows:

DPFG Executive Management Team:
• Chris Austin – Managing Principal 22 Years Experience • Chris Cole – Managing Principal 21 Years Experience • Chris Lightburne – Managing Principal 33 Years Experience • Peter Piller – Managing Principal 36 Years Experience

DPFG Senior Management Team:
• Lucy Gallo – Managing Principal 21 Years Experience • Rick Rosenberg – Managing Principal 41 Years Experience • Chris Hall – Principal 17 Years Experience
• Kelly Restelli – Director 9 Years Experience
• Mary Lu – Director 16 Years Experience
• Vanessa Stowe – Director 9 Years Experience
• Zach Crawford – Director 7 Years Experience
• Eric Quinlan – Sr. Manager 17 Years Experience
• Marc Santos – Sr. Manager (Disclosure Services) 15 Years Experience • Manju Pokharel – Sr. Manager 10 Years Experience • Nathan Morris – Sr. Manager 11 Years Experience
• Joey Lujan – Manager 11 Years Experience
• Matt Johnson – Manager 17 Years Experience
• Ryan Hall – Manager 11 Years Experience
• Steve Johnston – Manager 8 Years Experience

DPFG has over 40 other professionals that are at work with the Management Team to help process and solve their client's jobs and problems.

1.1.h
Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: Attachment 8_Applicant's_Fiscal Revenue Analysis_9.3.2024 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

RESOLUTION NO. R-92-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF

COLTON DENYING REQUEST FOR AN A MENDMENT TO THE

RECHE CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE

DESIGNATION FROM ESTATE DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL) TO
COMMERCIAL (FILE INDEX NO: DAP-001-453).

WHEREAS, local governments are authorized by Government Code section 65350 et seq. to prepare, adopt and amend general plans; and

WHEREAS, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment will change the land use designation from Estate Density (Residential) to Commercial for property located at 2501 Reche Canyon Road Assessor Parcel Numbers 0284-211-70, 71, 72; 1178-371-27; and

WHEREAS, the staff report accompanying this resolution is found to be true, adopted as Findings and incorporated in this resolution; and

WHEREAS, on June 11, 2024 , the Planning Commission of the City of Colton (“Planning Commission”) held a duly noticed public hearing at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the application were heard and the application was fully examined and voted 4-1-0 recommending to the City Council Denial of the request to Amend the Reche Canyon Specific Plan from Estate Density Zone to Commercial Zone.

WHEREAS, on September 17, 2024, the City Council of the City of Colton held a duly noticed public hearing at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the application were heard and the application was fully examined; and

WHEREAS, the Specific Plan Amendment was reviewed, studied, and found to comply with the Califo rnia Environ mental Quality Act (“CEQA”); however, the project is being recommended for denial as an inappropriate land use change to the Reche Canyon Specific Plan based on land use compatibility based on area location, noise, light and glare added to the area, and further traffic slowdown of Reche Canyon Road with the installation of two additional traffic signals as recommended by the Draft/Final EIR for the Project, and proposed 24 -hour store operations.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCI L OF THE CITY OF COLTON:

SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the City Council of the City of Colton, all written and oral evidence presented has been considered and reviewed, and the Commission finds that the Specific Plan Amendment request is not appropriate land use change for the area originally approved for residential development including further traffic delays to the area with the installation of two additional traffic signals to the area and that the project will not promote the public he alth, safety and welfare by construction of a commercial project on the subject property. Other areas of concerns included added noise and lighting to a neighborhood surrounded by low density residential development.

SECTION 2. The Specific Plan Amendment is not consistent with the General Plan in its entirety, and specifically Land Use Element Goal LU -1, LU-3, LU-9 and Policies LU-5.6, LU-

1.1.i
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Attachment 9_City Council Reso No. R-92-24_Denial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Colton City Council Resolution No. R-92-24
DAP-001-453 – Specific Plan Amendment (Reche Canyon Specific Plan) September 17, 2024 – Page 2 of 2

9.3, and LU-9.8 that pertain to commercial land uses within the City of Colton.

SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Colton, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Article 3, Section 15042 has the authority to disapprove a project; Therefore, no further action related to CEQA is required as the project was found not to be appropriat e change to the Reche Canyon Specific Plan Land Use Designation from Estate Density to Commercial.

SECTION 4. Based upon the findings set forth in Sections 1 and 2 of this Resolution, the City Council hereby denies the Specific Plan Amendment as presented.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 6. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ___day of September, 2024.

FRANK NAVARRO, Mayor

ATTEST:

STEPHANIE M. VARGAS
Deputy City Clerk

1.1.i
Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: Attachment 9_City Council Reso No. R-92-24_Denial (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 4-1

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA
P:\CL
T1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24)

4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN
Final EIR Available Electronically at the following link:
http://www.ci.colton.ca.us/779/Environmental-Documents

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-2 This page intentionally left blank

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-3

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
Aesthetics Mitigation Measures

4.1.1 Construction Perimeter Fencing. P r i o r t o t h e s t a r t o f c o n s t r u c t i o n , t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n contractor shall submit project plans to the
C i t y f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l t h a t i n c l u d e specifications to: 1) install a 6-foot high,
opaque fence around the perimeter of the
project site; 2) lock the fence during non-
construction hours; and 3) locate equipment
staging areas outside of public viewsheds.

Prior to the start
of construction
Submit project
plans to the City
that include the
required fencing.

Approve Final
Project Plans.

Development
Services
Department

Biological Resources Regulatory Compliance Measures

4.4.1 Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey . Prior to
g r o u n d d i s t u r b a n c e o r v e g e t a t i o n r e m o v a l o n the project site, the Project Applicant shall
provide evidence to the City that a pre-
c o n s t r u c t i o n n e s t i n g b i r d s u r v e y h a s b e e n c o m p l e t e d . T h e n e s t i n g b i r d s u r v e y s h a l l b e completed no longer than 3 days prior to
vegetation removal. Should no nesting birds be
identified, no further action is required. In the
event nesting birds are identified, a qualified
biologist shall determine an appropriate buffer
around the nest within which disturbance shall
be avoided until after its occupants have
fledged.

Prior to ground
disturbance or
vegetation
removal
Submit proof of
completed pre-
construction
nesting bird survey
to the City and
evidence of no
nesting birds.

Development
Services
Department

Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures

4.5.1 Cultural Resources Treatment Plan. P r i o r t o the issuance of grading permits, the applicant
s h a l l r e t a i n a q u a l i f i e d p r o f e s s i o n a l a r c h a e o l o g i s t t o p r e p a r e a C u l t u r a l R e s o u r c e s Treatment Plan to be submitted to the City for
review and approval for its implementation
during ground-disturbing activities (e.g.,
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit and
during grading
activities
Submittal of a
Cultural Resources
Treatment Plan to
the City.

Include
requirements of
measure on
Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-4 RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
vegetation removal, grading, excavation,
and/or trenching) occurring onsite for the
purposes of cultural resources monitoring (i.e.,
archaeological or historical resources).

The Cultural Resources Treatment Plan shall
specify (but not be limited to) the following:
z The professional qualification(s) and/or
approval of cultural resources monitor(s);
z The professional standards and procedures
to be following during archaeological
excavation and/or monitoring.
z The construction schedule, term/schedule
of onsite archaeological monitor(s) and the
extent of areas and activities to be
monitored.
z The authority of archaeological monitor(s)
to redirect construction activity in the
vicinity of any inadvertent discovery.
z The treatment, including recordation,
testing and evaluation, and/or retrieval, of
any inadvertent discovery.
z Curation of any cultural resources
r e c o v e r e d , e x c l u d i n g i t e m s c o v e r e d b y t h e provisions of applicable Treatment Plans or
Agreements pursuant to Mitigation
Measure 4.18.1.
z The responsibilities of the archaeological
monitor(s) including any requirement for
the completion of daily monitoring logs and
construction
contract
documentation.

Perform cultural
resources
monitoring.

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-5

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
end-of-monitoring reporting.
z Any insurance, specialized training or safety
requirement necessary for archaeological
monitor(s) working within the proposed
construction area.

S h o u l d t h e C i t y ( i . e . , L e a d A g e n c y ) d e t e r m i n e through consultation with the project
archaeologist and Native American tribes that
any inadvertent discovery is a potential Tribal
C u l t u r a l R e s o u r c e a s d e f i n e d i n A B 5 2 , treatment of such resources shall occur in
accordance with Mitigation Measures 4.18.1
t h r o u g h 4 . 1 8 . 3 ( s e e E I R S e c t i o n 4 . 1 8 , Tribal Resources). This mitigation measure, including
the contact information of the project
archaeologist, shall be incorporated in all
construction contract documentation and be
implemented to the satisfaction of the City.

4.5.2 Cultural Resources Treatment Plan Final
Monitoring Report. A final monitoring
compliance report detailing the implementation
of the Cultural Resources Treatment Plan,
including, but not limited to, the significance and
treatment of discovered cultural resources and
associated DPR 523 forms, shall be prepared by
the project archaeologist and submitted to the
City and the South Central Coastal Information
Center at California State University Fullerton
and interested Native American tribes.

This mitigation measure shall be incorporated in
all construction contract documentation and
implemented to the satisfaction of the City.

Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit and
upon completion
of cultural
resources
monitoring
Submit Cultural
Resources
Treatment plan to
the City, the South
Central Coastal
Information Center,
and interested
Native American
tribes containing
the required
language.

Include
requirements of
measure on
Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-6 RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
construction
contract
documentation.

4.5.3 Inadvertent Discovery of Cultural Resources. If
any suspected cultural resources are
discovered during ground-disturbing activities
and the cultural resources monitor is not
p r e s e n t , t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n s u p e r v i s o r i s obligated to halt work within a 50-foot radius
around the find and call the project
a r c h a e o l o g i s t t o t h e s i t e t o a s s e s s t h e significance of the find.

This mitigation measure, including the contact
information of the project archaeologist, shall
be incorporated in all construction contract
documentation and be implemented to the
satisfaction of the City.

Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit and
during grading
activities
Include
requirements of
measure on
construction
contract
documentation.

As necessary, halt
work, establish
required buffer(s),
and notify project
archaeologist.

Development
Services
Department

4.5.4 Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains . In
the event that human remains (or remains that
may be human) are discovered within the
construction areas, all activity within 50 feet of
the find shall be imme diately halted. Any
d i s c o v e r y o f h u m a n r e m a i n s s h a l l b e immediately reported by the Native American
monitor(s) to the County Coroner. If the
human remains are determined to be Native
American, the County Coroner shall notify the
Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC),
who shall appoint a Most Likely Descendant in
accordance with California Public Resources
Code 5097.98. Further required actions, as
determined necessary by the Most Likely
Descendant, shall include but shall not be
Prior to issuance
of a grading permit
and during grading
activities
Include
requirements of
measure on
construction
contract
documentation.

As necessary,
submit evidence to
the City of
completion of the
actions outlined in
this mitigation
measure.

Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-7

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
limited to:
z Funerary objects and burned ceremonial
remains (cremations) shall be treated in the
same manner as bone fragments.
z The discovery of any Native American
human remains and/or funerary objects
shall be kept confidential and secure to
prevent any further disturbance. In the case
where discovered human remains cannot be
fully documented and recovered on the
same day, the remains and associated
funerary objects, sacred objects and/or
objects of cultural patrimony shall be
c o ver ed w i t h an o paque mat er i al o r pl ac ed i n o p a q u e c l o t h b a g s . A p h y s i c a l b a r r i e r (e.g., metal plate, concrete slab that can be
moved by heavy equipment) shall be placed
over the excavation opening to protect the
remains until examination by the Most
Likely Descendant can occur. If this type of
protective barrier is not available, a 24-hour
guard shall be posted outside of working
hours.
z The Most Likely Descendant shall complete
his or her inspection and make
recommendations or preferences for
treatment within 48 hours of being granted
a c c e s s t o t h e s i t e . T h e M o s t L i k e l y Descendant shall identify and direct the
m o s t a p p r o p r i a t e m e a n s o f t r e a t i n g t h e human remains and any associated funerary
object(s). As determined through

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-8 RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
consultation with the City, the Most Likely
Descendant shall make recommendations
t h a t a l l o w t h e b u r i a l t o r e m a i n i n s i t u a n d protected.
z In the event the burial must be removed,
the Most Likely Descendant shall work
closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to
e n s u r e t h e r e m o v a l o f h u m a n r e m a i n s a n d associated funerary object(s) is conducted
carefully, ethically and respectfully.

Cr emat i o ns shal l ei t her be r em o ved i n b ul k or by a means to ensure completely
recovery of all material. As approved by the
Most Likely Descendant, data recovery
documentation shall be taken which
includes at a minimum detailed descriptive
notes and sketches. As approved by the
Most Likely Descendant, additional types of
documentation shall be permitted for data
recovery purposes.
z Human remains and associated funerary
objects shall be retained and reburied
w i t h i n s i x m o n t h s o f r e c o v e r y . T h e s i t e o f reburial/repatriation shall be on the project
site at a location at a site to be protected in
perpetuity identified by the Most Likely
Descendant and the City.
z I n t h e e v e n t t h e d i s c o v e r y i n c l u d e s s i x o r more burials, the location shall be
considered a cemetery pursuant to
California Health and Safety Code (§ 7003)
and a treatment plan shall be prepared. The

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-9

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
construction contractor shall consult with
the Most Likely Descendant regarding
avoidance of all such cemetery sites.
z Once complete, a final report of all activities
associated with or resulting from the
discovery of human remains shall be
submitted to the Native American Heritage
Commission.

This mitigation measure, including the contact
information of the qualified Native American
monitor(s), shall be incorporated in all
construction contract documentation and be
implemented to the satisfaction of the City.

Energy Regulatory Compliance Measures

4.6.1 Compliance with Title 13-Section 2449 of the
California Code of Regulations and the
California Green Building Standards. P r i o r t o
issuance of grading and building permits, the
City of Colton shall verify that the Project
Applicant and his/her contractor(s) submit
plans to the City indica ting incorporation of
B e s t A v a i l a b l e C o n t r o l M e a s u r e s d u r i n g construction of the Project. Best Available
Control Measures include, but are not limited
to, requirements that the Project Applicant
ensure off-road vehicles (i.e., self-propelled
diesel-fueled vehicles 25 horsepower and up
t h a t w e r e n o t d e s i g n e d t o b e d r i v e n o n r o a d ) limit vehicle idling to five minutes or less; and
register and label vehicles in accordance with
t h e C a l i f o r n i a A i r R e s o u r c e s B o a r d ( C A R B ) Diesel Off-Road Online Reporting System;
Prior to the
issuance of grading
and building
permits
Submit plans to the
City showing
evidence the
required measures
have been
incorporated into
the project.

Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-10 RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
restrict the inclusion of older vehicles into
fleets; and retire, replace, or repower older
engines or install Verified Diesel Emission
Control Strategies (i.e., exhaust retrofits).

Additionally, the construction contractor must
recycle/reuse at least 65 percent of the
construction material (including, but not
limited to, proposed aggregate base, soil,
mulch, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal,
and cardboard) and use “Green Building
Materials,” such as those materials that are
rapidly renewable or resource efficient, and
r e c y c l e d a n d m a n u f a c t u r e d i n a n environmentally friendly way, for at least 10
p e r c e n t o f t h e p r o j e c t , i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h C A L G r e e n r e g u l a t i o n s . T h i s c o n d i t i o n s h a l l b e i m p l e m e n t e d t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e C i t y o f Colton Development Services Director or
designee, and/or Building Official, or designee.

Geology and Soils Mitigation Measures

4.7.1 California Building Code. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall
provide evidence the following note is included
on grading and building plans. Project
contractor(s) shall comply with provisions of the
note:

Construction activities shall occur in
accordance with all applicable requirements
of the California Code o f Regulations (CCR),
T i t l e 2 4 ( a l s o k n o w n a s t h e C a l i f o r n i a Building Standards Code or the California
B u i l d i n g C o d e ) i n e f f e c t a t t h e t i m e o f construction.

Prior to the
issuance of grading
and building
permits
Submit plans to the
City with evidence
of compliance with
the most current
and applicable
provisions of the
California Building
Code.

Submit evidence to
the City that the
stated note is
included on all bid
and construction
C i t y E n g i n e e r

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-11

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
This note also shall be included in bid
documents issued to prospective construction
contractors. Failure to comply with the
California Building Code shall result in the
immediate stoppage of earthwork and/or
building construction and withholding of
occupancy permit until compliance with the
California Building Code is demonstrated to the
City Engineering Division and/or City Building
and Safety Division.
contract
documents.

4.7.2 Implementation of Final Site-Specific
Geotechnical Measures. Prior to the issuance of
grading and building permits, the applicant shall
provide to the City Engineer for review and
approval detailed grading and construction
plans that demonstrate the recommendations
specified in project- and site-specific
geotechnical investigation(s) previously
approved by the City have been incorporated
into the onsite earthworks and structures.

The developer and all contractors shall follow
the recommendations of the geotechnical
investigation, which include but are not limited
to 1) a 40-scale geotechnical grading plan review
by the project geotechnical engineer prior to
construction of the proposed project, 2)
preparation of the project site via removal of
surface obstructions, vegetation, and debris, 3)
removal of unsuitable or unconsolidated fill
materials, 4) overexcavation of surficial units,
including artificial fill, colluvium, and topsoil up
t o f i v e f e e t b e l o w e x i s t i n g g r a d e o r f o u r f e e t below proposed footing bottom, whichever is
Prior to the
issuance of grading
and building
permits
As required,
observation and
testing, during
specific grading/
construction
activities
Submit plans to the
City with evidence
that the project is
designed in
compliance with
recommendations
detailed in the site-
specific
geotechnical
investigation.

Submit the results
of any geotechnical
monitoring and/or
testing regimen to
the City.

C i t y E n g i n e e r

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-12 RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
deeper, to ensure all unsuitable fill is removed
prior to replacing it with properly compacted fill,
5) maintenance of properly compacted fill to
near optimum moisture content, 6) immediate
landscaping, irrigation, and maintenance of any
engineered slopes, 7) consultation with a
qualified corrosion engineer regarding
protection of buried steel or ductile iron piping
and conduit or, at a minimum, applicable
manufacturer’s recommendations for corrosion
protection of buried metal pipe be closely
followed, 8) caisson foundation to have a
minimum depth of ten feet below the lowest
adjacent grade, 9) maintaining appropriate
drainage and infiltration throughout the project
site in accordance with regulatory requirements,
10) review by the project geotechnical engineer
o f a n y u p d a t e d r o u g h o r p r e c i s e g r a d i n g o r conventional retaining wall or foundation plans
to ensure implementation of the
recommendations in the geotechnical
investigation, and 11) geotechnical observation
and/or testing at the following stages of
construction:
z During rough grading (removal/over-
excavation bottoms, fill placement, etc.);
z Geologic mapping of temporary backcuts;
z During retaining wall backfill and compaction;
z During utility trench backfill and compaction;
z During precise grading;

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-13

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
z After presoaking building pads and other
concrete-flatwork subg rades, and prior to
placement of aggregate base or concrete;
z Preparation of pavement subgrade and
placement of aggregate base;
z After building and wall footing excavation
and prior to placement of steel
reinforcement and/or concrete; and
z W h e n a n y u n u s u a l s o i l c o n d i t i o n s a r e encountered during any construction
operation.

4.7.3 Inadvertent Discovery of Paleontological
Resources. Prior to issuance of grading permits,
the City of Colton shall verify that the following
note is included on the construction plans:
“If paleontological resources are
encountered during the course of ground
disturbance, work within 60 feet of the
find shall be halted and an exclusionary
buffer shall be established. A qualified
paleontologist shall be contacted to
assess the find for scientific significance.

No ground-disturbing activity within the
60-foot exclusionary buffer may occur
without the consent of the paleontologist
and the City of Colton. If determined to
be significant, the fossil(s) shall be
collected from the field. The
p a l e o n t o l o g i s t m a y a l s o m a k e
recommendations regarding additional
mitigation measures, such as
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit
Submit evidence to
the City that the
stated language
regarding
paleontological
resources is
included on
construction plans.

Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-14 RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
paleontological monitoring. Scientifically
significant resources shall be prepared to
the point of identification, identified to
t h e l o w e s t t a x o n o m i c l e v e l p o s s i b l e , cataloged, and curated into the
permanent collections of a museum
repository. If scientifically significant
paleontological resources are collected, a
report of findings shall be prepared to
document the collection.”
Hazardous and Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measures

4.9.1 Inadvertent Discovery of Buried Hazardous
Materials. In the event any subsurface feature,
material, former improvement, etc. is found
during grading or construction that cannot be
clearly identified as non-hazardous, work shall
be halted in that area until a qualified
environmental professional is retained to
identify the material and determine if it is
hazardous as defined by the California Code of
Regulations Title 22 Section 66262.11. In the
event the material is determined to be non-
hazardous, no further action is required. If the
material is found to be hazardous, the qualified
environmental professional shall determine
t h e n a t u r e a n d e x t e n t o f t h e m a t e r i a l , t h e potential risk of removal, and other
appropriate steps to effectively remediate and
dispose of any hazard materials found during
grading and construction. An Excavation,
D i s p o s a l a n d R e s t o r a t i o n P l a n s h a l l b e prepared by a certified professional for the site
o n b e h a l f o f t h e o w n e r o f t h e s i t e t o a d d r e s s Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit and
during grading
activities
Submit evidence to
the City that this
requirement is
included on all
construction
contract
documents.

As required, submit
a hazardous
material
excavation,
disposal, and
restoration plan.

Evidence the
removal and
disposal of any
hazardous material
encountered
and/or the site of
recovery is treated
in compliance with
Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-15

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
remediation of contaminated soils at the site.

The workplan shall describe the logistical
procedures and field work that will be carried
out to excavate and dispose of the soil
contaminated with hazardous materials and
restoration of the site. Excavation and removal
shall be performed by a California-licensed
hazardous substances removal contractor. The
environmental professional shall direct and
coordinate any disposal of hazardous materials
according to applicable state and federal laws
and regulations (Title 22 of the California Code
o f R e g u l a t i o n s a n d T i t l e 4 0 o f t h e C o d e o f Federal Regulations), including disposal at a
landfill approved for such material. Written
results of any testing, remediation, or removal
shall be provided to the City Development
Services Department within 30 days of such
action.
the hazardous
material
excavation,
disposal, and
restoration plan
and the applicable
local, State, and/or
federal guidelines.

Hydrology and Water Quality Regulatory Compliance Measures

4.10.1 Construction General Permit. Prior to the
i s s u a n c e o f g r a d i n g p e r m i t s , t h e p r o j e c t applicant shall submit evidence to the City that
c o v e r a g e u n d e r t h e c u r r e n t S t a t e W a t e r Resources Control Board (SWRCB) General
P e r m i t f o r D i s c h a r g e s o f S t o r m W a t e r Associated with Construction Activity (Order
No. 2022-0057-DWQ, National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System No. CAS000002)
(Construction General Permit) has been
obtained. As required by the Construction
G e n e r a l P e r m i t , t h e p r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t s h a l l submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit
Submit proof of the
required SWRCB
General
Construction
Permit coverage to
the City.

Submit a SWPPP
for review and
approval to the
City, the San
Bernardino County
Flood Control
District, and Santa
Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-16 RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
Plan (SWPPP) to the City of Colton, San
Bernardino County Flood Control District, and
Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB) for review and approval.

The SWPPP shall identify pre- and post-
construction Best Management Practices
(BMPs) to prevent the release of sediment and
pollutants into downstream waterways and the
compliance with all applicable General Permit
requirements. BMPs to be implemented may
include (but shall not be limited to) the
following:

Sediment discharges from the project site may
be controlled by the following: sandbags, silt
fences, straw wattles and temporary debris
basins (if deemed necessary), and other
discharge control devices. The construction
and condition of the BMPs are to be
periodically inspected by the RWQCB during
construction, and repairs would be made as
required.

Materials that have the potential to contribute
non-visible pollutants to storm water must not
be placed in drainage ways and must be placed
in temporary storage containment areas.

All loose soil, silt, clay, sand, debris, and other
earthen material shall be controlled to
eliminate discharge from the site. Temporary
soil stabilization measures to be considered
include covering disturbed areas with mulch,
temporary seeding, soil stabilizing binders,
Ana RWQCB.

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-17

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
fiber rolls or blankets, temporary vegetation,
and permanent seeding. Stockpiles shall be
surrounded by silt fences and covered with
plastic tarps.

The SWPPP shall include inspection forms for
routine monitoring of the site during the
construction phase.

A d d i t i o n a l r e q u i r e d B M P s a n d e r o s i o n c o n t r o l measures shall be documented in the SWPPP.

T h e S W P P P m u s t b e k e p t o n s i t e f o r t h e duration of project construction and shall be
available to the local RWQCB for inspection at
any time.

4.10.2 Dewatering Permit. At least 45 days prior to
groundwater dewaterin g activities, the
Construction Contractor shall submit an NOI to
the Santa Ana RWQCB to obtain coverage
under the General Waste Discharge
Requirements for Discharges to Surface Waters
That Pose an Insignificant (De Minimis) Threat
t o W a t e r Q u a l i t y ( G r o u n d w a t e r D i s c h a r g e Permit), Order No. R8-2020-0006, NPDES No.

CAG998001. Groundwater dewatering
activities shall comply with all applicable
provisions in the Groundwater Discharge
Permit, including water sampling, analysis,
treatment (if required), and reporting of
dewatering-related discharges. Upon
completion of ground water dewatering
activities, a NOT shall be submitted to the
Santa Ana RWQCB.

At least 45 days
prior to any
dewatering activity
Submit evidence to
the City that the
required Notice of
Intent (NOI) has
been submitted to
the Santa Ana
RWQCB.

Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-18 RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks

4.10.3 Final Water Quality Management Plan. P r i o r
to the issuance of grading permits, the Project
Applicant shall submit to the City for review
and approval, a final Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP), as required by
RWQCB Order No. R8-2010-0036, NPDES NO.

CAS618036 (MS4 permit). The final Water
Quality Management Plan shall identify
necessary site design BMPs, source control
BMPs, LID BMPs, and treatment control BMPs
(if applicable).

P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f g r a d i n g p e r m i t s , t h e applicant shall submit to the City for review
and approval evidence that project plans
incorporate the facilities, features and/or
B M P s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e W a t e r Q u a l i t y Management Plan (WQMP). This measure shall
be implemented to the satisfaction of the City
Public Works Department and Planning
Division as appropriate.

Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit
Submit evidence to
the City that
project plans
incorporate the
required facilities
and features from
the Final WQMP.

Development
Services
Department

Noise Mitigation Measures

4.13.1 Hours of Construction. T h e c o n s t r u c t i o n contractor shall limit construction activities to
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.

Monday through Saturday. Construction shall
be prohibited outside these hours and on
Sundays and federal holidays.

Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit
Submit evidence to
the City that the
construction plans
include the stated
limitations.

Development
Services
Department

4.13.2 Construction Equipment Noise BMPs. Prior to
issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall
submit evidence to the City for review and
approval, that the following measures are
included on the grading plan cover sheet:

Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit
Submit evidence to
the City that the
construction plans
include the stated
measures.

Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-19

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
The construction contr actor shall equip all
construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with
properly operating and maintained mufflers
( e . g . , a r e n o t o l d , b r o k e n o r l o o s e ) c o n s i s t e n t with manufacturers’ standards.

The construction contractor shall locate
equipment staging in areas that will create the
greatest distance between construction-
related noise sources and the noise-sensitive
receptors nearest the project site during all
project construction.

The construction contractor shall place all
stationary construction equipment so that the
emitted noise is directed away from the
sensitive receptors nearest the project site.

4.13.3 Noise Wall. Prior to City approval of the final s i t e p l a n , t h e s i t e p l a n s h a l l b e r e v i s e d t o include a minimum 9 ft high solid barrier (e.g.,
a 9-ft-high wall or a combination berm/wall
totaling 9 feet in height) located along the
project’s western property line between the
commercial/retail building and the car wash/
convenience store building as part of the
project design. The noise wall or noise wall/
barrier combination shall be designed and
constructed to be continuous with no gaps or
holes and have a minimum density of 4 pounds
per square foot.

Prior to the
approval of a Final
Site Plan
Submit evidence to
the City that the
Final Site Plan
incorporates a
wall/barrier as
required by the
stated measure.

Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-20 RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
Transportation/Traffic Mitigation Measures

4.17.1 Traffic Management Plan. Prior to the
commencement of grading activities, the
Construction Contractor shall prepare a Traffic
Management Plan (TMP) to the satisfaction of
t h e C i t y o f C o l t o n a n d s h a l l e n s u r e t h a t t h e plan is implemented during construction with
the goal of maintaining safety and adequate
traffic operations to roadways affected by
construction traffic. The TMP shall be
consistent with the California Temporary
Traffic Control Handbook (CATTCH) (previously
known as the California Joint Utility Traffic
Control Manual). At a minimum, the TMP shall
include, but not be limited to, the following:
z P r o v i s i o n s f o r t e m p o r a r y t r a f f i c c o n t r o l t o improve traffic flow on public roadways and
e n s u r e t h e s a f e a c c e s s i n t o a n d o u t o f t h e site (e.g., warning signs, lights and devices,
and flag personnel);
z Prohibiting construction-related vehicles
from parking on public streets;
z Providing safety precautions for
pedestrians, equestrians, and bicyclists
through such measures as alternate routing
and protection barriers;
z Obtaining the required permits for truck
h a u l r o u t e s f r o m t h e C i t y o f C o l t o n a n d / o r the California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans); and
z Maintaining unobstructed emergency
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit
Submit a Traffic
Management Plan
to the City.

Development
Services
Department
and/or City
Engineer

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-21

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
access to the project site and adjacent areas
during all phases of construction. Flag
p e r s o n n e l s h a l l b e t r a i n e d t o a s s i s t i n emergency response by restricting or
controlling the movement of traffic that
could interfere with emergency vehicle
access.

Tribal Cultural Resources

4.18.1 Native American Monitoring Agreement. A t
l e a s t 3 0 d a y s p r i o r t o t h e c o m m e n c e m e n t o f ground-disturbing activity, the construction
c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l p r o v i d e a N a t i v e A m e r i c a n Monitoring Agreement with interested tribes
to the City for review and approval. The Native
American monitoring agreement shall be
developed in consultation with the appropriate
N a t i v e A m e r i c a n t r i b a l c o n t a c t ( s ) o f t h e interested tribes and shall identify (but not be
limited to) the following:
z The professional qualification(s) and/or
approval of Native American monitor(s);
z The professional standards and procedures
to be following during archaeological
excavation and/or monitoring;
z The construction schedule, term/schedule
of onsite Native American monitor(s) and
the extent of areas and activities to be
monitored;
z The responsibilities of Native American
monitor(s) including any requirement for
the completion of daily monitoring logs and
end-of-monitoring reporting;
At least 30 days
prior to ground
disturbance
Submit a Native
American
Monitoring
Agreement to the
City.

Submit evidence to
the City that this
requirement is
included on all
construction
contract
documents.

Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-22 RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
z The authority of Native American monitor(s)
to redirect construction activity in the
vicinity of any inadvertent discovery;
z The method and/or terms of compensation
(if any) for Native American monitor(s); and
z Any insurance, specialized training or safety
requirement necessary for Native American
monitor(s) working within the proposed
construction area.

This mitigation measure shall be incorporated
in all construction contract documentation and
implemented to the satisfaction of the City.

4.18.2 Inadvertent Discovery of Native American
Cultural Resources. Any archaeological
r e s o u r c e u n e a r t h e d b y c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s shall be evaluated by the Qualified
Archaeologist outlined in Mitigation Measure

4.5.1 and the Native Monitor(s). If the
resources are Native Ame rican in origin, the
interested tribe or trib es shall coordinate with
the landowner regarding treatment and
curation of these resources.
z If a resource is determined by the Qualified
Archaeologist to constitute a “historical
resource” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.5(a) or has a “unique
archaeological resource” pursuant to Public
R e s o u r c e s C o d e S e c t i o n 2 1 0 8 3 . 2 ( g ) , t h e Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate
with the applicant and the City to develop a
f o r m a l t r e a t m e n t p l a n t h a t w o u l d s e r v e t o r e d u c e i m p a c t s t o t h e r e s o u r c e s . T h e During grading
and/or upon the
discovery of any
archeological
material on site
Submit evidence to
the City that
archeological
resources (if any)
unearthed during
grading/
construction on
site have been
evaluated,
preserved, and/or
curated pursuant
to the Native
American
Monitoring
Agreement and/or
Cultural Resources
Treatment Plan.

Submit evidence to
the City that this
requirement is
Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-23

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
treatment plan established for the
resources shall be in accordance with CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical
resources and Public Resources Code
Sections 21083.2(b) for unique
archaeological resources.
z Preservation in place by accommodating
onsite reburial of the discovered items with
the interested tribes. This shall include
measures and provisions to protect the
future reburial area from any future
impacts. Reburial shall not occur until all
cataloguing and recordation efforts have
been completed.
z A curation agreement with an appropriate
qualified repository within San Bernardino
County that meets federal standards per 36
CFR Part 79. The collections and associated
records shall be transferred, including title,
to an appropriate curation facility within
San Bernardino, to be accompanied by
payment of the fees necessary for
permanent curation.

This mitigation measure shall be incorporated
in all construction contract documentation and
implemented to the satisfaction of the City.
included on all
construction
contract
documents.

4.18.3 Native American Monitor. I f a n y s u s p e c t e d Native American cultural resource is
discovered during ground-disturbing activities
and the Native American monitor is not
present, construction activities within 50 feet
o f t h e s u s p e c t e d r e s o u r c e s u p e r v i s o r s h a l l b e Upon the
discovery of any
suspected Native
American material
during ground
disturbance
Halt all ground
disturbance within
50 feet of the
discovery and
notify the Native
Development
Services
Department

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-24 RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
halted. The Native American monitor shall be
notified of the suspected discovery
immediately.

This mitigation measure, including the contact
information of the qualified Native American
monitor(s), shall be incorporated in all
construction contract documentation and be
implemented to the satisfaction of the City.
activities American monitor.

Submit evidence to
the City that this
requirement is
included on all
construction
contract
documents.

Wildfire Mitigation Measures

4.20.1 Fire Protection Plan. Prior to commencement
o f g r a d i n g a c t i v i t i e s , t h e p r o j e c t o w n e r s h a l l prepare a Fire Protection Plan (FPP) for City
review and approval. At a minimum, the FPP
shall include the following:
z A list of all major fire hazards, proper
h a n d l i n g a n d s t o r a g e p r o c e d u r e s f o r hazardous materials, potential ignition
sources and their control, and the type of
fire protection equipment necessary to
control each major hazard;
z Procedures to control accumulations of
flammable and combustible waste
materials;
z P r o c e d u r e s f o r r e g u l a r m a i n t e n a n c e o f safeguards installed on heat-producing
equipment to prevent the accidental
ignition of combustible materials;
z The name or job title of employees
responsible for maintaining equipment to
p r e v e n t o r c o n t r o l s o u r c e s o f i g n i t i o n o r Prior the start of
grading activities
Submit a Fire
Protection Plan to
the City that
satisfies the stated
requirements.

Development
Services
Department
and/or Fire
Department
designee

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- 4-25

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT DAP-001-453
Environmental Impact Report: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
fires;
z The name or job title of employees
responsible for the control of fuel source
hazards;
z Fire protection infrastructure and
equipment to be provided on site, including
fire hydrant placement;
z Information regarding water supply and
available flows during a wildfire;
z Information regarding evacuation routes,
alternative evacuation routes; and
Information regarding allowable building
materials and defensible space, building
ignition and fire resistance, and building fire
protection systems.

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) 4-26 This page intentionally left blank

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24)

APPENDIX A

DRAFT EIR AND TECHNICAL APPENDICES

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON P LAZA P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

F INAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
M AY 2024

P:\CLT1802.06 Reche Canyon Retail EIR Reinitiation\3.4_3.5 Response to Comments_Final EIR\Reche Canyon Draft FEIR_052824.docx (05/29/24) This page intentionally left blank

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- September 2023

DRAFT

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT

CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- September 2023

DRAFT

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

RECHE CANYON PLAZA PROJECT

CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA

Submitted to:

City of Colton
Planning Division
659 N. La Cadena Drive
Colton, California 92324

Prepared by:

LSA
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200
Riverside, California 92507
951.781.9310

Project No. CLT1802.06

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... i FIGURES AND TABLES ............................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................ vi

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................. ........................................ 1-1

1.1 Introduction .............................................. ........................................................................ 1-1

1.2 Proposed Project .......................................... ..................................................................... 1-1

1.3 Issues Addressed a nd Areas of Controversy to be Resolved ............................................ 1-2

1.4 Alternatives to th e Proposed Project ................................................................................ 1-4

1.5 Summary of Impacts, Mitigation, and Level of Impacts....... ........................................... 1-10

2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 2-1

2.1 Lead Agency ............................................... ....................................................................... 2-1

2.2 Overview of th e Eir Process .............................................................................................. 2 - 2

2.3 EIR Content and Format .................................... ................................................................ 2-3

2.4 Baseline Condition ........................................ .................................................................... 2-5

2.5 Area-Wide, Regionally, or Statewide Significant Project ... ............................................... 2-6

2.6 Documents Incorporated by Reference ....................... ..................................................... 2-7

2.7 Public Review Process ..................................... ................................................................ 2-10

2.8 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ............... ............................................... 2-12

2.9 Cumulative Impacts ........................................ ................................................................. 2-12

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 Site Location and Characteristics ......................... ............................................................. 3-1

3.2 Land Use .................................................. .......................................................................... 3-1

3.3 Project Characteristics ................................... ................................................................... 3-6

3.4 Project Objectives ........................................ ................................................................... 3-15

3.5 Required Actions .......................................... ................................................................... 3-16

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION .......................................................... 4-1

4.1 Aesthetics ................................................ ....................................................................... 4.1-1

4.2 Agricultural and Forest Resources ......................... ........................................................ 4.2-1

4.3 Air Quality ............................................... ....................................................................... 4.3-1

4.4 Biological Resources ...................................... ................................................................. 4.4-1

4.5 Cultural Resources ........................................ ................................................................. 4.5-1

4.6 Energy .................................................... ......................................................................... 4.6-1

4.7 Geology and Soils ......................................... .................................................................. 4.7-1

4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................. .......................................................... 4.8-1

4.9 Hazards and Haza rdous Materials.................................................................................. 4.9-1

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality .............................. ........................................................ 4.10-1

4.11 Land Use and Planning ................................................................................................. 4.11-1

4.12 Mineral R esources ........................................................................................................ 4.12-1

4.13 Noise and Vibration ...................................................................................................... 4.13-1

4.14 Population and Housing ............................................................................................... 4.14-1

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents ii

4.15 Public Service s and Facilities ........................................................................................ 4.15-1

4.16 Recreation .................................................................................................................... 4.16-1

4.17 Transportation ........................................... .................................................................. 4.17-1

4.18 Tribal Cultur al Resources ............................................................................................. 4.18-1

4.19 Utilities and Service Systems ........................................................................................ 4.19-1

4.20 Wildfire ......................................................................................................................... 4.20-1

5.0 OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................ 5-1

5.1 Summary of Significant Unavoidable Impacts ................ .................................................. 5-1

5.2 Energy Impacts ............................................ ...................................................................... 5-1

5.3 Growth-Inducing Impacts ................................... ............................................................... 5 - 1

5.4 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes ............................................................... 5-3

6.0 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................. 6-1

6.1 Introduction .............................................. ........................................................................ 6-1

6.2 Alternatives Initially Considered but Rejected from Further Consideration .................... 6-4

6.3 Alternatives under Consideration .......................... ........................................................... 6-5

6.4 Alternatives Analysis ..................................... .................................................................... 6-6

6.5 Summary Comparison of Project Alternatives ................ ................................................ 6-18

6.6 Environmentally Superior Alternative ...................... ....................................................... 6-18

7.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 7-1

7.1 General Re ferences ........................................................................................................... 7-1

7.2 Project-Specific Studies .................................. ................................................................... 7-3

7.3 Websites .................................................. .......................................................................... 7-3

8.0 LIST OF PREPARERS .......................................................................................... 8-1

8.1 City of Colton ............................................ ......................................................................... 8-1

8.2 LSA Associates, Inc. ...................................... ..................................................................... 8-1

APPENDICES
Appendices Are Available On The City’s Website At:
https://www.ci.colton.ca.us/779/environmental-documents A-1: NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND COMMENT LETTERS
A-2: PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING MATERIALS AND COMMENTS
B-1: AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
B-2: ENERGY CALCULATIONS
C: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
D: CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
E: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
F: PHASE I HAZARDOUS MATERIALS REPORT
G: PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
H: NOISE AND VIBRATION ANALYSIS
I: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents iii

FIGURES AND TABLES

FIGURES
Figure 2.1: Cumulative Projects ......................................................................................................... 2-14 Figure 3.1: Regional Location .............................................................................................................. 3-2 Figure 3.2: Site Location and Surrounding Land Uses ......................................................................... 3-3 Figure 3.3: Reche Canyon Specific Plan Land Use Map ....................................................................... 3-5 Figure 3.4 Proposed Site Plan .............................................................................................................. 3-7 Figure 3.5.A: Building Elevations ......................................................................................................... 3-8 Figure 3.5.B Building Elevations .......................................................................................................... 3-9 Figure 3.5.C Building Elevations ........................................................................................................ 3-10 Figure 3.5.D Building Elevations ........................................................................................................ 3-11 Figure 3.5.E Building Elevations......................................................................................................... 3-12 Figure 3.5.F: Building Elevations ........................................................................................................ 3-13 Figure 3.6: Conceptual Landscape Plan ............................................................................................. 3-14 Figure 4.1.1 Site Photographs ......................................................................................................... 4.1-3 Figure 4.10.1 FEMA Flood Zones .................................................................................................. 4.10-36 Figure 4.12.1: Mineral Resource Zone in Project Area ................................................................... 4.12-2 Figure 4.20.1: CAL FIRE Hazard Severity Zone ................................................................................ 4.20-2 Figure 4.20.2: San Bernardino Hazard Classification Map ............................................................. 4.20-3 Figure 4.20.3: Project Vicinity Fire History Map ............................................................................. 4 . 2 0 - 6

TABLES
Table 1.A: Notice of Preparation Comments....................................................................................... 1-3 Table 1.B: Public Scoping Meeting Comments .................................................................................... 1-5 Table 1.C: Native American Consultation ............................................................................................ 1-8 Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......................................... 11 Table 2.A: Cumulative Projects List ................................................................................................... 2-15 Table 3.A: Existing RCSP Land Use Characteristics .............................................................................. 3-4 Table 4.1.A: Existing Views in the Project Area ................................................................................ 4.1-2 Table 4.1.B: Reche Canyon Specific Plan Consistency Analysis ...................................................... 4.1-12 Table 4.3.A: Ambient Air Quality Standards ..................................................................................... 4.3-3 Table 4.3.B: Summary of Health Effects of the Major Criteria Air Pollutants .................................. 4.3-4 Table 4.3.C: Ambient Air Quality Monitored in the Project Vicinity ................................................ 4.3-6 Table 4.3.D: Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin (Update) ......... 4.3-7 Table 4.3.E: Applicability of SCAQMD-Recommended Mitigation Measures .................................. 4.3-8 Table 4.3.F: SCAQMD Significance Thresholds ............................................................................... 4.3-15 Table 4.3.G: General Plan Consistency Analysis ............................................................................. 4.3-18 Table 4.3.H: Short-Term Regional Construction Emissions ............................................................ 4.3-23 Table 4.3.I: Project Operational Emissions ..................................................................................... 4.3-23 Table 4.3.J: Project Localized Construction Emissions ................................................................... 4.3-25 Table 4.3.K: Project Localized Operational Emissions .................................................................... 4.3-26

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents iv
Table 4.4.A: Plant and Animal Species Observed on the Project Site .............................................. 4.4-2 Table 4.4.B: General Plan Consistency Analysis, Biological Resources .......................................... 4.4-13 Table 4.5.A: Cultural Resources Within One Mile of the Project Site .............................................. 4.5-9 Table 4.5.B: General Plan Consistency Analysis ............................................................................. 4.5-10 Table 4.6.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis, Energy .................................................................. 4.6-9 Table 4.6.B: Proposed Project Energy Consumption Estimates During Construction.................... 4.6-11 Table 4.6.C: Estimated Annual Energy Use of the Proposed Project ............................................. 4.6-14 Table 4.7.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis ............................................................................... 4 . 7 - 8 Table 4.7.B: RCSP Consistency Analysis ............................................................................................ 4.7-8 Table 4.8.A: Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases ......................................................... 4.8-2 Table 4.8.B: Potential Impacts of Global Warming and Expected Consequences for California ..... 4.8-5 Table 4.8.C: Construction GHG Emissions ...................................................................................... 4.8-21 Table 4.8.D: Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................................................... 4.8-21 Table 4.8.E: General Plan Consistency Analysis, Greenhouse Gases ............................................. 4.8-23 Table 4.9.A: Regulatory Databases Search ....................................................................................... 4.9-3 Table 4.9.B: General Plan Consistency Analysis, Emergency Response Planning .......................... 4.9-16 Table 4.9.C: General Plan Consistency Analysis, Wildland Fire Risks ............................................. 4.9-18 Table 4.10.A: Descriptions of Beneficial Uses .............................................................................. 4.10-13 Table 4.10.B: Beneficial Uses of Surface Receiving Waters ......................................................... 4.10-13 Table 4.10.C: Surface Water Quality Objectives for Inland Surface Waters: Santa Ana RWQCB 4.10-15 Table 4.10.D: Groundwater Quality Objectives for Groundwater Basins .................................... 4.10-18 Table 4.10.E: General Plan Consistency Analysis ......................................................................... 4.10-21 Table 4.10.F: General Construction Site Best Management Practices ......................................... 4.10-24 Table 4.10.G: City of Colton Groundwater Extractions (2016–2020) (AFY) ................................. 4.10-32 Table 4.11.A: Existing On-Site and Adjacent Off-Site Land Uses and Land Use Designations ....... 4.11-2 Table 4.11.B: General Plan Consistency Analysis ......................................................................... 4.11-12 Table 4.13.A: Definitions of Acoustical Terms ................................................................................ 4 . 1 3 - 4 Table 4.13.B: Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources ..................................................... 4.13-4 Table 4.13.C: Short-Term Ambient Noise Level Measurements .................................................... 4.13-5 Table 4.13.D: Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results ........................................................ 4.13-6 Table 4.13.E: Existing Traffic Noise Levels ...................................................................................... 4.13-7 Table 4.13.F: Interpretation of Vibration Criteria for Detailed Analysis ........................................ 4.13-8 Table 4.13.G: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria .................................................................. 4.13-8 Table 4.13.H: Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environment ................................. 4.13-10 Table 4.13.I: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels ......................................................... 4.13-13 Table 4.13.J: Existing (2021) Traffic Noise Levels Without and With Project ............................... 4.13-15 Table 4.13.K: Cumulative (2023) Traffic Noise Levels Without and With Project ........................ 4.13-15 Table 4.13.L: Future Build-Out (2040) Traffic Noise Levels Without and With Project ............... 4.13-16 Table 4.13.M: Car Wash Noise Levels .......................................................................................... 4 . 1 3 - 1 7 Table 4.13.N: Rooftop HVAC Noise Levels.................................................................................... 4.13-18 Table 4.13.O: Stationary-Source Noise Levels .............................................................................. 4.13-20 Table 4.13.P: Stationary-Source Noise Levels (with Mitigation Measure) ................................... 4.13-21 Table 4.13.Q: Vibration Source Amplitudes for Construction Equipment ................................... 4.13-23 Table 4.13.R: Summary of Construction Vibration Levels ............................................................ 4.13-24 Table 4.14.A: SCAG Demographic Forecasts .................................................................................. 4.14-1

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents v
Table 4.14.B: Existing and Future Jobs/Housing Ratios ................................................................. 4.14-2 Table 4.14.C: General Plan Consistency Analysis ........................................................................... 4.14-7 Table 4.15.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis, Police Protection .............................................. 4.15-4 Table 4.15.B: General Plan and RCSP Consistency Analysis, Fire Protection ............................... 4.15-10 Table 4.15.C: Project Area School Enrollment ............................................................................. 4.15-16 Table 4.16.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis ........................................................................... 4.16-2 Table 4.17.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis ........................................................................... 4.17-7 Table 4.18.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis ........................................................................... 4.18-7 Table 4.19.A: Projected RUWMP Water Supply and Demand for Normal Year, Single Dry Year, and Multiple Dry Years ................................................................................................. 4.19-4 Table 4.19.B: Projected Demands for Water (acre-feet) ............................................................. 4.19-11 Table 4.19.C: Projected WVWD Water Supply and Demand Plus Project for Normal Year, Single Dry Year, and Multiple Dry Years .............................................................................. 4.19-12 Table 4.19.D: Landfill Capacities Used by the City of Colton........................................................ 4.19-15 Table 4.20.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis, Wildfire .......................................................... 4.20-12 Table 6.A: Comparison of Alternative 1 to the Project Objectives ................................................... 6-10 Table 6.B: Comparison of Alternative 2 to the Project Objectives .................................................... 6-14 Table 6.C: Comparison of Alternative 3 to the Project Objectives .................................................... 6-17 Table 6.D: Summary Comparison of Alternatives ............................................................................. 6-19

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents vi

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
°C degrees Celsius
°F degrees Fahrenheit
μg/m
3 micrograms per cubic meter
AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards
AB 52 Assembly Bill 52
AB 337 Assembly Bill 337
AB 341 Assembly Bill 341
AB 939 Assembly Bill 939
AB 1327 Assembly Bill 1327
AB 1600 Assembly Bill 1600
AB 1739 Assembly Bill 1739
AB 2751 Assembly Bill 2751
AB 2926 Assembly Bill 2926
AB 3030 Assembly Bill 3030
ACMs asbestos-containing materials
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
ADT average daily traffic
AFY acre-feet per year
amsl above mean sea level
A-P Act Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act
APN Assessor's Parcel Number
APS Alternative Planning Strategy
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
ARB California Air Resources Board
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
BACMs Best Available Control Measures
Basin South Coast Air Basin
Basin Plan Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plan bgs below ground surface

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents vii
BMP Best Management Practice
BNSF Burlington Northern Santa Fe
BTUs British thermal units
C-2 General Commercial
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CAFE Corporate Average Fuel Economy
CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Cal/EPA California Environmental Protection Agency
Cal/OSHA California Occupational Safety and Health Administrati on CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CALGreen Code California Green Building Standards Code
California Register California Register of Historical Resources Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CAP Climate Action Plan
CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board
CAS Climate Adaptation Strategy
CAT Climate Action Team
CATTCH California Temporary Traffic Control Handbook
CBC California Building Code
CBSC California Building Standards Commission
CCAA California Clean Air Act
CCR California Code of Regulations
CCWD City of Colton Water Department
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CEC California Energy Commission
CED Colton Electric Department
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CEQA Guidelines Guidelines for Ca lifornia Environmental Quality Act CERCLA Comprehensive Environment al Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents viii
CESA California Endangered Species Act
CEU Colton Electric Utility
CFC California Fire Code
CFD Colton Fire Department
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CGP Construction General Permit
CGS California Geological Survey
CH
4 m e t h a n e
CHHSL California Human Health Screening Levels
City City of Colton
CIWMB California Integrated Waste Management Board
CJUSD Colton Joint Unified School District
CLCA California Land Conservation Act of 1965
CMC Colton Municipal Code
CMP Congestion Management Program
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level
CNPS California Native Plant Society
CO carbon monoxide
CO
2 carbon dioxide
CO2e carbon monoxide equivalent
Corps United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cortese List Hazardous Waste and Substances Site list
CPD Colton Police Department
CPUC California Public Utilities Commission
CTC California Transportation Commission
CTR California Toxics Rule
CUI Culturally Unidentifiable Human Remains Inventories CUPA Certified Unified Program Agency
CWA Federal Clean Water Act
CWRF Colton Water Reclamation Facility
dB decibels

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents ix
dBA A-weighted decibels
DCV Design Capture Volume
DHS California Department of Health Services
DIF Development Impact Fee
DMA Drainage Management Area
DOC Department of Conservation
DOF California Department of Finance
DPR Department of Parks and Recreation
DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control
DU dwelling units
du/ac dwelling units per acre
EDR Environmental Data Resources
EIC Eastern Information Center
EIR Environmental Impact Report
EJ Environmental Justice
EMFAC2021 California Emissions Factor Model, Version 2021 EO Executive Order
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ESA Environmental Site Assessment
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FESA Federal Endangered Species Act
FHSZ Fire Hazard Severity Zone
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map
FMMP Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
Forest Practice Act Z’Berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act
FPP Fire Protection Plan
FRA Federal Responsibility Area
FRAP Fire and Resources Assessment Program
FSZ Farmland Security Zone
ft foot/feet

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents x
FTA Federal Transit Administration
FUSD Colton Unified School District
GC General Commercial
GHG greenhouse gas
GHGRP San Bernardino County Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan GPA General Plan Amendment
GPCD gallons per capita per day
GPD gallons per day
GPD/unit gallons per day per unit
GPY gallons per year
GSA groundwater sustainability agency
GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plan
GVWR gross vehicle weight rating
GWh gigawatt-hours
GWP global warming potential
H
2S hydrogen sulfide
HCP Habitat Conservation Plan
HFCs hydrofluorocarbons
HI Hazard Index
HRA health risk assessment
HSC Health and Safety Code
HUD U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
HVAC heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
I-10 Interstate 10
I-215 Interstate 215
ICC International Code Council
IEUA Inland Empire Utilities Agency
in/sec inches per second
IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation
IPCC United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IRUWMP Integrated Regional Urban Water Management Plan

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents xi
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
kWh kilowatt-hours
LBP lead-based paint
lbs/day pounds per day
LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard
L
dn day-night average noise level
Leq equivalent continuous sound level
LHMP Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
LID Low Impact Development
LIP Local Implementation Plan
L
max maximum instantaneous noise level
LOS level of service
LRA Local Responsibility Area
LST Local Significance Threshold
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MEI maximum exposed individual
mg/L milligrams per liter
mg/m
3 milligrams per cubic meter
MGD million gallons per day
MICR maximum individual cancer risk
MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MMT CO
2e million metric tons of car bon dioxide equivalent
MPD Multiple Product Dispenser
mpg miles per gallon
mph miles per hour
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
MRF material recovery facility
MRZs Mineral Resource Zones
MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System
MT CO
2e metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
MW megawatts

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents xii
Mw moment magnitude
N2O nitrous oxide
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAGPRA Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
National Register National Register of Historic Places
NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan
NFIP National Flood Insurance Program
NHPA National Historic Preservation Act
NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NIMS National Incident Management System
NO
2 nitrogen dioxide
NOA Notice of Availability
NOC Notice of Completion
NOI Notice of Intent
NOP Notice of Preparation
NOT Notice of Termination
NO
X nirogen oxides
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NPPA Native Plant Protection Act
NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service
O
3 o z o n e
OAL Office of Administrative Law
OAL State Office of Administrative Law
OEHHA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
OES Office of Emergency Services
OHWM ordinary high water mark
OPR California Office of Planning and Research
PCC Portland cement concrete
PFCs perfluorocarbons
PM
10 particulate matter less than 10 microns in size

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 230
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents xiii
PM2.5 particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size
Porter-Cologne Act Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act ppb parts per billion
ppm parts per million
PPV peak particle velocity
PRC Public Resources Code
project Reche Canyon Plaza Project
RCALUC Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission
RCM Regulatory Compliance Measure
RCP Regional Comprehensive Plan
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RCSP Reche Canyon Specific Plan
REC Recognized Environmental Condition
RHNA Regional Housing Needs Assessment
RIX facility Rapid Infiltrati on and Extraction Facility RMS root-mean-square
RPS Renewable Portfolio Standard
RTA Riverside Transit Agency
RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities St rategy RTS Residential Transfer Site
RUWMP Regional Urban Water Management Plan
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SAFE Rule Safer Affordable Fuel- Efficient Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021–2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks
San Bernardino P-C
Region
San Bernardino Production-Consumption Region
SAR Santa Ana River
SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
SB 18 Senate Bill 18
SB 50 Senate Bill 50
SB 330 Senate Bill 330
SB 375 Senate Bill 375

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents xiv
SB 610 Senate Bill 610
SB 901 Senate Bill 901
SB 1000 Senate Bill 1000
SB 1016 Senate Bill 1016
SB 1168 Senate Bill 1168
SB 1319 Senate Bill 1319
SBCFPD San Bernardino County Fire Protection District
SBCIWMP San Bernardino Countywide Integrated Waste Management P lan SBCOG San Bernardino Council of Governments
SBCTA San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
SBCTA Guidelines SBCTA Recommended Traffic Impact Analysis Guid elines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service
SBIA San Bernardino International Airport
SBIAA San Bernardino International Airport Authority
SBVMWD San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water Department SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center
SCE Southern California Edison
SCLCP South Colton Livable Corridor Plan
SDS Safety Data Sheet
Second Update 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update
SF
6 sulfur hexafluoride
SGMA Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014
SHMA Seismic Hazards Mapping Act
SHMP State Hazard Mitigation Plan
SHPO State Historic Preservation Office
SIP State Implementation Plan
SLF Sacred Lands File
SMARA Surface Mining and Reclamation Act
SO
2 s u l f u r d i o x i d e

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents xv
SoCalGas Southern California Gas Company
SOI Sphere of Influence
SP Service Population
SPRW Southern Pacific Railway
sq mi square miles
SRA Source Receptor Area
SRA State Responsibility Area
SSC Species of Special Concern
SSMP Sewer System Management Plan
SSO site-specific wat er quality objective
SSO Sanitary Sewer Overflow
SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
TACs toxic air contaminants
TCP traditional cultural place
TCR tribal cultural resources
TDS Total Dissolved Solids
TIN Total Inorganic Nitrogen
TIS Traffic Impact Study
TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load
TMP Transportation Management Plan
TNWs traditional navigable waters
TPZ Timberland Production Zone
TRI Toxics Release Inventory
TWLTL Two Way Left Turn Lane
UBC Uniform Building Code
UPRR Union Pacific Railroad
USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers
USC United States Code
USDA United States Department of Agriculture
USDOT U.S. Department of Transportation

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Table of Contents xvi
USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service
UST underground storage tank
UWMP Urban Water M anagement Plan
VdB vibration veloc ity in decibels
VHFHSZ Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone
VMT vehicle miles traveled
VMT Guidelines City of Colton VMT (Vehicle Miles Traveled) Guid elines VOC volatile organic compounds
Water Department City of Colton Water Department
WDID waste discharge identification number
WDR Waste Discharge Requirement
Williamson Act California Land Conservation Act of 1965 WOTUS waters of the United States
WPMP Wildfire Prevention and Mitigation Plan
WQMP Water Quality Management Plan
WSA Water Supply Assessment
WUI Wildland-Urban Interface
WVWD West Valley Water District
ZEVs zero emission vehicles
ZNE zero net energy

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-1

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 INTRODUCTION
This Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2019039115) for the Reche Canyon Plaza Project (“project” or “proposed project”) has been prepared by LSA on behalf of the City of Colton (City) to identify and evaluate the potential environmental effects associated with the construction and operation of the proposed development.

This Draft EIR has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)1 and Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act2 (CEQA Guidelines), both of which regulate the preparation of EIRs. This section of the EIR summarizes the project; the environmental impacts and mitigation required to reduce or eliminate those impacts determined to be significant; areas of controversy known by the City, including those raised by other agencies and the public; the issues to be resolved; and alternatives to the project that could reduce the extent and/or severity of the project’s environmental impacts3. While this Executive Summary provides an overview of these issues, more detail is provided in subsequent sections of this EIR as follows:
x Introduction (Chapter 2.0)
x Project Description (Chapter 3.0)
x Environmental Impacts (Chapter 4.0)
x Other CEQA Topics (Chapter 5.0)
x Project Alternatives (Chapter 6.0)

1.2 PROPOSED PROJECT
The proposed Reche Canyon Plaza Project and associated discretionary actions are, collectively, the “project” or “proposed project” assessed in this EIR. Unless otherwise noted, the terms “Reche Canyon Plaza Project”, “project” and “proposed project” are used interchangeably. The project proposes the construction of approximately 18,124 square feet4 of commercial uses on approximately 2.90 acres along the west side Reche Canyon Road south of Crystal Ridge Lane within Planning Area 9 of the Reche Canyon Specific Plan (RCSP).

The project consists of the development of approximately 18,124 commercial uses including a 1,750 square foot car wash, 3,000 square foot convenience store, 3,570 square foot fueling station consisting of six fueling dispensers (12 pumps), and approximately 9,800 square feet of divisible retail/retail space to accommodate neighborhood sales/services. 1 California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resou rces Code, Division 13. Environmental Quality, §§ 21000 – 21189.3, January 1, 2019.
2 California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3: Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, §§ 15000 – 15387, January 1, 2019. 3 CEQA Guidelines, §15123
4 Generally, square footages have been rounded. Actual finished square footages would not vary significantly.

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-2
Access to the project site will be provided from driveways along the eastern boundary of the project site at Old Reche Canon Road. The project would also provide access to the project site via a fourth leg at the Reche Canyon Road/Shadid Drive intersection. This access driveway would be for emergency access only. The project proposes to amend the onsite RCSP designation from Estate Density residential to Commercial to allow the proposed neighborhood retail commercial center.

Also, the project proposes to amend the City of Colton General Plan to designate APN 163-172-48, an off-site parcel at 635 S. 7th Street, from General Commercial to Mixed Use Downtown to transfer the residential capacity from the project site to this new location in order to prevent a net loss of residential capacity within the City in compliance with SB330 requirements.

A detailed description of the project and its objectives is included in Chapter 3.0 (Project Description) of this EIR.

1.3 ISSUES ADDRESSED AND AREAS OF CONTROVERSY TO BE RESOLVED As permitted under CEQA1, in cases where the City determines an EIR will clearly be prepared, an Initial Study is not required. Based on its review of the project, the City has determined the potential impacts resulting from the construction and/or operation of the project, including cumulative impacts, require an EIR; therefore, an Initial Study was not prepared for the project. In the absence of an Initial Study, this EIR analyzes the project’s impact on the twenty environmental issues identified in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines.
x Aesthetics
x Agricultural and Forestry Resources
x Air Quality
x Biological Resources
x Cultural Resources
x Energy
x Geology/Soils
x Greenhouse Gas Emissions
x Hazards and Hazardous Materials
x Hydrology /Water Quality
x Land Use /Planning
x Mineral Resources
x Noise
x Population/Housing
x Public Services
x Recreation
x Transportation
x Tribal Cultural Resources
x Utilities/Service Systems
x Wildfire
The project’s impact, the severity of any impact, and the mitigation required to reduce or eliminate the impacts relative to these environmental issues are addressed in Sections 4.1 through 4.20 and summarized in Table 1.D at the end of this section.

Issues of concern and/or controversy related to the project were further identified by the City through responses to the Notice of Preparation (NOP), Public Scoping Meetings, and Native American Consultation (Tables 1.A through 1.C below).
1 CEQA Guidelines §15063(a).

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-3

1.3.1 Notice of Preparation
The objective of distributing an NOP is to solicit public comment, ensuring the full and appropriate examination of issues of concern in the EIR. The NOP was distributed to the State Clearinghouse, as well as to the agencies, organizations, persons considered likely to be interested in the project and its potential impacts and the owner/occupants of properties within 1,000 feet of the project site.

Comments received regarding the NOP have been used to identify impacts that could result from implementation of the project.

The NOP was distributed for a 30-day public comment period from March 21 to April 19, 2019. The NOP, NOP distribution lists, and the NOP response letters are included in Appendix A-1 of this EIR.

Table 1.A provides a general summary of the three comments received by the City during the NOP review period and identifies in which section of the EIR comment has been addressed.

Table 1.A: Notice of Preparation Comments
Agency/Organization/Individual Date Summary of Comments Addressed in Section(s) of the EIR
San Bernardino County Fire
Protection District, Andrew Bezdek,
Hazardous Materials Specialist
April 1, 2019 Noted require ments for installation of
underground fuel storage tanks.

Sections 4.9 and 4.20
San Bernardino County Department
of Public Works, Michael R. Perry,
Supervising Planner
April 15, 2019 Noted NPDES and WQMP requirements;
identified an encroachment permit for any
work affecting the Reche Channel; and
requested future project notifications.

Section 4.10
South Coast Air Quality Management
District, Lijin Sun, Program
Supervisor CEQA/IGR
April 16, 2019 The SCAQMD p rovided recommendations
regarding the analysis and mitigation of
potential air quality and health risk impacts,
including the identification of source
material and guidance documents; noted
project alternatives are required that reduce
any identified significant impacts; and noted
the gas station would require a SCAQMD
permit.

Section 4.3

1.3.2 Public Scoping Meeting
The City conducted a public scoping meeting to explain the EIR process and to solicit public comment on the issues and level of analysis required in the EIR. The public scoping meeting was held to further determine the scope and content of the environmental analysis contained in the EIR.

The public scoping meeting was held on April 3, 2019, at 6:00 p.m. at Reche Canyon Elementary School (3101 Canyon Vista Drive Colton, CA 92324.) Copies of the NOP (including a project description) and the project’s conceptual site plan were available to the public for review.

Table 1.B provides a summary of comments received during and subsequent to the public scoping meeting. The public scoping meeting materials and comments received during and subsequent to the scoping meeting are provided in in Appendix A-2.

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-4

1.3.3 Native American Consultation (Senate Bill 18 and Assembly Bill 52) Senate Bill 18 (SB 18) requires local governments to consult with Native American tribes prior to making certain planning decisions and to provide notice to tribes at certain key points in the planning process. These consultation and notice requirements apply to adoption and amendment of both General Plans and Specific Plans. Prior to the amendment or adoption of General or Specific Plans, local governments must notify the appropriate Native American representatives of the opportunity to conduct a consultation concerning the preservation and mitigation of impacts to sacred places located on land within the local governments’ jurisdictions and affected by the adoption of amendment of General or Specific Plans. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) stated on February 24, 2017, “A search of the SFL was completed for the USGS quadrangle information provided with negative results.” The NAHC further provided contact information for 13 Native American Tribes.

Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) mandates City consultation with California Native American tribes during the CEQA process. Recognizing that tribes may have expertise regarding their tribal history and practices, AB 52 requires lead agencies to provide notice to tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a project if they have requested notice of projects proposed within that area. Consultation may include discussing the type of environmental review necessary, the significance of tribal cultural resources, the significance of the project’s impacts on the tribal cultural resources, and alternatives and mitigation measures recommended by the tribe.

Consultation must be conducted in good faith between the tribal government and the lead agency and is deemed concluded when either the parties agree to measures to mitigate or avoid a significant effect on a tribal cultural resource (should a significant effect exists) or when a party concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached. Four local tribes have requested notification from the City pursuant to AB 52.

The proposed development is a project under CEQA and includes a Specific Plan Amendment; therefore, consultation provision pursuant to both SB 18 and AB 52 is required. Table 1.C details the Native American governments contacted pursuant to these statutes.

1.4 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT
An EIR must describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the project objectives, and would avoid or substantially lessen its significant effects (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126.3). The EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative; rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that “… foster informed decision making and public participation.” The City, as Lead Agency, is responsible for selection the range of project alternatives and must disclose its reasoning for disclosing those alternatives.

The City has identified the following alternatives to the project. Chapter 6.0 (Alternatives) of this EIR provides a detailed description of each project alternative, assesses the potential environmental impacts associated with its construction and operation of each alternative, and provides justification for the selection of the “environmentally superior” alternative.

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-5
Table 1.B: Public Scoping Meeting Comments
Agency/Organization/
Individual Date Summary of Comments Addressed in Section(s) of the EIR
John Riesenman 04/03/2019 This individual commented on traffic congestion between the hours of 3 pm to 6:30 pm. Problem is Moreno Valley traffic using the canyon as a bypass to the freeway. Project would increase traffic in the area.

4.17 Ken and Linda Black 04/03/2019 This individual commented on tr ansportation and traffic, specifically infrastructure upgrades.

4.17 Terri Riesenman 04/03/2019 Thi s individual commented on transportation and traffic, specifically fire exit availability for emergency and
endangered species.

4.4, 4.15, 4.17 and 4.20
Cindy Turner 04/03/2019 This individual commented on biologica l resources, public services, transportation and traffic and wildfire. Specifically showed concerns related to potential collisions and wildlife loss as a result.

4.4, 4.15, 4.17 and 4.20
Charles DeVere 04/03/2019 This individual commented on aesthetics, hydrology and water quality and transportation and traffic. Specifically, the impact on existing businesses.

4.1, 4.10 and 4.17
Geraldine F. Farris 04/03/2019 This individual commented on la nd use and planning, public services and transportation and traffic. Specifically, public safety from roadway traffic accident occurrences.

4.11, 4.15 and 4.17
Robert Goodrich 04/03/2019 This individual commented on biological resources.

Specifically, impact on riparian species in the area.

4.4 Elizabeth Skates 04/03/2019 Thi s individual commented on hydrology and water quality, noise and transportation and traffic. Specifically, canyon echoes during nighttime.

4.10, 4.13 and 4.17
Patricia Palacios 04/03/2019 Thi s individual would like to see future noticing and chances to comment.

Bill Gause 04/03/2019 This individual would like to see future noticing and chances to comment.

Peter Tasaka 04/03/2019 This i ndividual commented on aesthetics, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, public services, transportation and traffic and utilities. Specifically, accidents and congestion on road, impact to existing business, rural character and water usage.

4.1, 4.5, 4.10, 4.15, 4.17 and

4.19 Amira K. Dandouch 04/03/2019 This individual commented on air quality, noise and transportation and traffic. Specifically, air quality concerns.

4.3, 4.13 and 4.17
Amira Kassab 04/03/2019 This individual commented on biologica l resources and transportation and traffic. Specifically, protection of burros at the site.

4.4 and 4.17
Ziad Dandouch 04/03/2019 This individual commented on air qual ity and transportation and traffic.

4.3 and 4.17
Faye Pribble 04/03/2019 This indi vidual commented on aesthetics, hazards, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, public services, transportation and traffic, utilities and wildfire. Specifically, impact to the rural character of the canyon, gasoline tanker hazard, waste, water quality, increased utility/service supplies, wildfire evacuation and public safety.

4.1, 4.9, 4.10, 4.11, 4.15,

4.17, 4.19 and 4.20
Susan Peterson 04/03/2019 This individual would like to be not ified when the Draft EIR is available.

William R. Gause 04/03/2019 This individual commented on biolo gical resources, hazards, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning and
transportation and traffic. Specifically, impact to ecology, public and traffic safety, unknown nature of future
businesses and proper consultation with Corps and CDFW.

4.4, 4.9, 4.10, 4.11 and 4.17
Maria Loen 04/03/2019 This indi vidual commented on public services however they support the project.

4.15 Marlene Mancha 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-6
Table 1.B: Public Scoping Meeting Comments
Agency/Organization/
Individual Date Summary of Comments Addressed in Section(s) of the EIR
Ismael Cisneros 04/03/2019 Th is individual supports the project.

Glen Martin 04/03/2019 This ind ividual supports the project. They recommend better site maintenance and security.

Nancy Olan 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Kristelle Alvarez 04/03/2019 This individual supports the proj ect.

Samira Saad 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Davon Webb 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Jared Quiroz 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Harry Johnson 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Joshua Peterson 04/03/2019 Thi s individual commented on, transportation and traffic.

Specifically, walkability of the community and traffic light requirement.

4.17 Angel Madrid 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Suzanne Peterson 04/03/2019 Th is individual commented on aesthetics and transportation and traffic. They support the project but recommend design that is in conformance with the rural character and mixed use of the community.

4.1 and 4.17
Edie Friesen 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Antonio Hernandez 04/03/2019 This individual supports the proj ect.

Andrew Lima 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Harland Nalbaho 04/03/2019 This individual supports the projec t.

Mr. and Mrs. Tyler 04/03/2019 T his individual supports the project.

Emelia Gonzales 04/03/2019 This individual supports the projec t.

Candyce Johnson 04/03/2019 This individual commented on transp ortation and traffic and supports the project.

4.17 David M. Saad 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Gina Bosch Saad 04/03/2019 Thi s individual supports the project.

Austin Kent 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Dean Kent 04/03/2019 This individual commented on traffic in t he canyon and the fact the road narrows to 2 lanes from 4 lanes which
exacerbates the traffic problem, but he supports the project.

4.17 Norbert Kanag 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Beshoy Shehata 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Michael Flores 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Pierre Gomez 04/03/2019 This i ndividual commented on transportation and traffic and supports the project.

4.17 Hannah Shehata 04/03/2019 This individual commented on transpo rtation and traffic and supports the project.

4.17 Gary Avila 04/03/2019 This indi vidual commented on transportation and traffic and support the project. They recommend signal light and less activity at the back of the project site, right turn signs, and closing of Reche Canyon Road.

4.17 Deborah Bonner 04/03/2019 This individual commented on transportation and traffic and support the project. They recommend traffic improvements.

4.17 Lilia Loredo 04/03/2019 This i ndividual commented on aesthetics and transportation and traffic. Specifically, improving the look of the area and reducing traffic.

4.1 and 4.17
John Sutton 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

David Swinson 04/03/2019 This individual supports the project.

Jason Maynard Jr 04/03/2019 Thi s individual commented on biological resources, noise, hydrology and water quality, transportation and traffic and utilities. Specifically, home value and peace reduction, effect to donkeys, traffic access to the site, flooding, and increased garbage and pollution.

4.4, 4.10, 4.13, and 4.17

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-7
Table 1.B: Public Scoping Meeting Comments
Agency/Organization/
Individual Date Summary of Comments Addressed in Section(s) of the EIR
Jacob Maynard 04/03/2019 This i ndividual commented on aesthetics, public services and transportation and traffic. Project will “kill my [his] vibe.”

4.1, 4.15 and 4.17
John Stahler 04/03/2019 This individual commented on public se rvices and transportation and traffic. Specifically, safety issues, accidents, traffic flows and increased police and fire services.

4.15 and 4.17
Majella van Aken 04/03/2019 Th is individual commented on aesthetics, air quality and noise. Specifically, presence of garbage, trash odors,
increased noise, and allergies from emissions.

4.1, 4.3, and 4.13
Mr. & Mrs. Banasiak 04/03/2019 This individual commented on aesthetics, biological resources, hydrology and water quality, land use and
planning, noise, and cumulative. Specifically, full time operation, increased criminal activity, effect to canyon aesthetic, underground spring, wildlife use of property and cumulative effects.

4.1, 4.4, 4.10, 4.11, 4.13,

4.15, 4.20, and cumulative
Lori Langford 04/03/2019 This i ndividual commented on aesthetics, land use and planning, noise, public services, transportation and traffic, and utilities. Specifically, increase in crime, trash, illegal parking, zoning changes, and difficult commute.

4.1, 4.11, 4.13, 4.15, 4.17
and 4.19.

Arline King 04/03/2019 This individual commented on transporta tion and traffic, specifically the creation of more traffic and need for
adequate roadway improvements.

4.17 Cathy Ludwig 04/03/2019 This i ndividual commented on biological resources, hazards, hydrology and water quality, public services, and
transportation and traffic. Specifically, traffic accidents, criminal activity, impact on existing businesses, effect on donkeys, and equestrian access.

4.4, 4.9, 4.10, 4.15, and 4.17

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-8
Table 1.C: Native American Consultation
Native American Government/Contact Date of Contact Consultation Summary Senate Bill 18 Notification
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians May 9, 2019 Responded t hat the project site is outside the Tribe’s traditional use area, deferred to other tribes in the area, and declined further consultation.

Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission
Indians
Unaware of specific tribal resou rces that might be affected by the project and encouraged contact with other local Tribes for information.

Recommended monitoring by a qualified cultural resources monitor occur during pre-construction and construction ground disturbance.

Cabazon Band of Mission Indians No response
Cahuilla Band of Indians No response
Los Coyotes Band of Mission Indians No response
Morongo Band of Mission Indians Requested continued consultation on the project regarding SB 18. The City responded to the request by providing a copy of the confidential Archaeological Site Survey Record (33-001067) to the Tribe on May 24, 2019. No additional requests from the Tribe have been made to date.

Ramona Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians No response
San Fernando Band of Mission Indians No response
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Declined further consultati on at this time based on their assessment of the project location. They requested several Mitigation Measures to be added to the cultural and tribal cultural discussions of the environmental document, including the handling of unanticipated cultural finds and human remains.

Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians No response
Serrano Nation of Mission Indians No response
Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians No response
Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians No response
Assembly Bill 52 Consultation
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians May 8, 2019 Responded t hat the project site is outside the Tribe’s traditional use area, deferred to other tribes in the area, and declined further consultation.

Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission
Indians
Unaware of specific tribal resou rces that might be affected by the project and encouraged contact with other local Tribes for information.

Recommended monitoring by a qualified cultural resources monitor occur during pre-construction and construction ground disturbance.

Cabazon Band of Mission Indians No response
Cahuilla Band of Indians No response
Los Coyotes Band of Mission Indians No response
Morongo Band of Mission Indians Requested continued consultation on the project regarding AB 52. The City responded to the request by providing a copy of the confidential Archaeological Site Survey Record (33-001067) to the Tribe on May 24, 2019. No additional requests from the Tribe have been made to date.

Ramona Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians No response
San Fernando Band of Mission Indians No response
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Declined further consultation at this time based on their assessment of the project location. They requested several Mitigation Measures to be added to the cultural and tribal cultural discussions of the environmental document, including the handling of unanticipated cultural finds and human remains.

Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians No response
Serrano Nation of Mission Indians No response
Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians No response
Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians Tribe declined further consultation.

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-9

1.4.1 Alternative 1: No Project Alternative Existing Reche Canyon Specific Plan Designation Alternative
Alternative 1 would build the site under the current General Plan and Zoning designation of Reche Canyon Specific Plan (RCSP). The RCSP designates the site (referred to as RCSP Planning Area 9) for Estate Density (residential) uses with a two single family units per acre as the maximum density. At two units per acre the project site would accommodate approximately 5 to 6 single family units (2.9 acres x 2 units per acre = 5.8 units). It is not certain that 5 or 6 residential units could be constructed on the site because of its triangular shape. Driveways for the units would access Old Reche Canyon Road to be consistent with the General Plan Circulation Element policy which discourages driveways accessing arterial roadways (Reche Canyon Road). Alternative 1 would incrementally reduce impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, and noise, and would have similar impacts associated with wildfire when compared to the proposed project.

Alternative 1 would meet the objectives of the RCSP; however, would not meet most of the project objectives.

1.4.2 Alternative 2: Reduced Project
Alternative 2 would construct the site as proposed but without the car wash and fueling station.

Specific land uses would include a 3,000-square foot convenience store and 9,800 square feet of neighborhood commercial retail space. Alternative 2 would require an amendment to the RCSP from Estate Residential to General Commercial and would require a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to an off-site parcel to accommodate a transfer or residential capacity from the project site to a new location to prevent a net loss of residential capacity within the City in compliance with SB 330 requirements. The configuration of the remaining land uses would be the same as what is proposed. Alternative 2 would incrementally reduce impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, and would have similar impacts associated with wildfire when compared to the proposed project. Alternative 2 would meet all of the project objectives but would not meet the objectives of the RCSP, which is to build estate single family housing o the project site.

1.4.3 Alternative 3: Project Without Car Wash and Fueling Station and Additional Retail Square Footage
Alternative 3 would eliminate the car wash and fueling station but replace those uses with additional retail services so that the proposed development would include 18,124 square feet of commercial retail uses, which is the same total development square footage as the project. The drive aisles, fueling dispensers and underground fuel storage tanks would be eliminated because of these changes. Under Alternative 3, the project site would be accessed off Old Reche Canyon Road with no driveways off Reche Canyon Road. Alternative 2 would require an amendment to the RCSP from Estate Residential to General Commercial and would require a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to an off-site parcel to accommodate a transfer or residential capacity from the project site to a new location to prevent a net loss of residential capacity within the City in compliance with SB 330 requirements. Alternative 3 would incrementally reduce impacts on hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, and wildfire, and potentially reduce impacts on noise when compared to the proposed project. Similar to Alternative 2, Alternative 3 meets all the objectives of

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-10
the proposed project but would not implement the objectives of the RCSP, which is to construct estate single family housing on the project site.

1.4.4 Environmentally Superior Alternative
The Environmentally Superior Alternative is the one that would result in the fewest or least significant impacts. Alternative 3 is the Environmentally Superior Alternative because it would result in incrementally less impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, wildfire, and noise as compared to the other alternatives while still meeting the project objectives. Although project impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, wildfire, and noise are already less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

A full description of Alternative 3 and associated discussion of impacts as compared to the project, is provided in Chapter 6.0, Alternatives.

1.5 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS, MITIGATION, AND LEVEL OF IMPACTS Table 1.D provides a summary of the project impacts, proposed mitigation measures, and the level of significance of each impact following the application of identified mitigation measures.

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-11
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?

4.1 Aesthetics
Threshold 4.1-1: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Scenic Vista: Less Than Significant Impact. The project would not have significant adverse impacts on regional scenic vistas. Travelers on local roadways would experience changes in onsite scenery, but existing views are not considered to be of such high quality that the project would destroy a scenic vista. There is development on all side of the project site, which already obstructs views of the surrounding landscape and intervening topography, therefore, the proposed project would not appreciably alter views for motorists traveling along Reche Canyon Road or on the adjacent local roadways.

Furthermore, the project itself would not obstruct views of nearby hillsides or the surrounding mountains.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.1-2: Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?
Scenic Resources within State Scenic Highways: No Impact. The project will not have a significant impact on scenic resources within State scenic highways because the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) does not identify any State-designated scenic highways in the project area.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.1-3: In a non-urbanized areas, would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point) If the project is in an urbanized area, would it conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Existing Visual Character: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The visual quality of the project site could be degraded during construction. Construction related impacts to visual character would be addressed by the implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.1.1, which requires the installation of a 6-foot high, opaque fence around the perimeter of the site to shield view of the project site from passing motorists. The proposed project provides commercial uses, landscaping, and community amenities consistent with the applicable design criteria and project conditions established by the City. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation 4.1.1, the project would not degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the project site or its surroundings during construction or operation.

Yes 4.1.1 Construction Perimeter Fencing. Prior to the start of construction, the construction contractor shall submit project plans to the City for review and approval that include specifications to: 1) install a 6-foot high, opaque fence around the perimeter of the project site; 2) lock the fence during non- construction hours; and 3) locate equipment staging areas outside of public viewsheds.

No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-12
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Threshold 4.1-4: Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? Light and Glare: Less than Significant Impact. Development of the project site would introduce new sources of light in the project area. However, all lighting would be consistent with the City’s Municipal Code, including ensuring the lighting design prevents off-site light or glare. The proposed structures would not contain large or expansive areas of glass, polished metal or other reflective surfaces. Therefore, light and glare associated with the proposed project would not negatively impact surrounding land uses or the daytime or nighttime views in the area.

No No mitigation is required. No
Cumulative Aesthetic Impacts: Less than Significant Impact. Development of the cumulative list of proposed projects would be subject to applicable standards, regulations, and design guidelines to create a visually consistent and cohesive pattern of development and prevent adverse impacts to aesthetics, scenic vistas and resources, and visual character. It is anticipated that other development in the City would be equally subject to these regulations.

Therefore, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on aesthetic resources.

No No mitigation is required. No

4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Threshold 4.2-1: Would the project result in the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural land use? Farmland Conversion: No impact. The project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to nonagricultural uses. According to the State Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), no land on or adjacent to the project site is designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.2-2: Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
Existing Zoning and Williamson Act: No Impact. The project would not conflict with land zoned for an agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. There is no land zoned for agricultural uses or under a Williamson Act contract either on the project site or on any adjacent properties.

No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-13
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Threshold 4.2-3: Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?
Threshold 4.2-4: Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Forest Land Zoning: No Impact. The project would not conflict with existing zoning for forest land or result in the loss or conversion of forest land to non- forest uses. The site is zoned Planning Area Nine of the RCSP, with the predominant land use classified as Estate Density. According to the City’s General Plan and Zoning map, no area of the project site is identified as forest land or designated for forest uses. The project would not result in the loss or conversion of forest land.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.2-5 Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use, or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Involve Changes in the Environment That Would Result in the Conversion of Agricultural Land or Forest Land: No Impact. The project would not involve changes to the environment that would result in the conversion of agricultural land or forest land to nonagricultural or non-forest uses. No current agricultural use occurs on site, and neither the site nor nearby properties in the surrounding Reche Canyon has been used for agricultural purposes in the past. These areas do not constitute as forest or timberland, nor is the project zoned for forest or timberland production.

No No mitigation is required. No
Cumulative Agricultural and Forestry Resources: No Impact. The conversion of the project site from vacant land to commercial use represents a loss of 0.5 percent acre of grazing land, which is equivalent to less than 0.01 percent of the total grazing land countrywide. Grazing uses are generally not afforded protection pursuant to CEQA. Due to the onsite absence of any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance, minor loss to the total grazing land countrywide, and the absence of any current on-site agricultural use or forest use, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on agricultural or forest resources.

No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-14
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?

4.3 Air Quality
Threshold 4.3-1: Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
Air Quality Management Plan Consistency: Less than Significant Impact. The project would not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standard violation or cause a new violation and is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the AQMP.

No No mitigation is required No
Threshold 4.3-2: Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non- attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard? Increase in Criteria Air Pollutants (Regional Construction and Operation): Less than Significant Impact. Construction and operation of the project would not exceed air quality emissions thresholds. Therefore, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant air quality impacts.

No No mitigation is required No
Threshold 4.3-3: Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Sensitive Receptors: Less than Significant Impact. Modeling outputs indicate the project would not exceed Local Significance Thresholds (LSTs) during project construction and operation. Therefore, the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

No No mitigation Is required. No
Threshold 4.3-4: Would the project result in emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Odors: Less than Significant Impact. The project would generate construction- related odors that would be temporary and would not occur after completion of construction. Additionally, the project would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113 standards for paint applications and Rule 1108 standards regarding application of asphalt as a matter of regulatory policy. Potential sources of project-generated operational odors include disposal of commercial refuse. Project-generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in accordance with City solid waste regulations.

Additionally, the project would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which regulates nuisance odors. With mandatory compliance of applicable regulations, the project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people.

No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-15
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Cumulative Air Quality Impacts: Less than Significant Impact. The cumulative area for the discussion of air quality impacts is the Basin. Due to the nonattainment status of the Basin, the primary air pollutants of concern would be NOx and VOCs, which are ozone precursors, and PM10 and PM2.5. If a project does not exceed the SCAQMD recommended daily regional emission thresholds, then project-specific impacts would also not result in a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment. The project’s short-term construction and long-term operational emissions would not exceed SCAQMD’s criteria pollutant and LST.

Therefore, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on air emissions.

No No mitigation is required. No

4.4 Biological Resources
Threshold 4.4-1: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Candidate, Non-listed Sensitive, or Special-Status Species: No Impact. There would be no impacts to listed species or any other special-status species. The biological survey found no evidence of listed, candidate, non-listed sensitive, or special-status plant or wildlife species on the project site. The project site is graded and regularly disked to reduce fire hazards, is surrounded by existing development, has low habitat quality for native plants and animals, and is relatively small (2.9 acres) compared to other areas. In addition, the project site contained no evidence of occupancy or suitable habitat for any listed, special status, or otherwise sensitive species or biological habitat.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.4-2: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Riparian Habitat or Other Sensitive Natural Communities: No Impact. There are no impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. The biological survey indicated a small onsite man-made retention basin which is maintained to capture local storm water runoff. This basin will be filled and the street runoff will be redirected to the storm water drainage system. Any vegetation currently present in the basin does not constitute riparian vegetation under the definitions of the California Fish and Game Code. The project site does not contain any water-related resources subject to federal No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-16
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
jurisdiction and any federally protected wetlands. Due to the previous grading and regular disking on the project site, there are no sensitive natural communities that are present on the project site.

Threshold 4.4-3: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
Jurisdictional Waters/Wetlands: No Impact. The project will have no effects on jurisdictional waters, wetlands and streambeds. The project site does not include any federally protected wetlands or other non-wetland waters subject to federal or state regulatory authority.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.4-4: Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Wildlife Movement and Nesting/Migratory Birds: Less Than Significant Impact/No Impact. The project site is located within a mountain canyon area consisting of large areas of open space and areas of clustered residential development. The open space areas may provide for wildlife movement and/or serve as nursery sites. However, Reche Canyon Road, which separates the project site from open space areas, presents a significant hazard to local wildlife, The project site is within an area of clustered development and is relatively small in size (2.9 acres), and heavily disturbed from regular disking activities. Therefore, it is unlikely that the project site itself is used as a wildlife movement corridor and/or nursery site. Furthermore, because the project site is located within a cluster of existing residential development, the proposed project has a low potential to indirectly affect wildlife movement through edge effects (e.g., indirect effects associated with artificial lighting, increased noise, unnatural predators, competitors, unauthorized recreational use). Additionally, the project site does not contain suitable habitat for nesting/migratory birds.

Therefore, development of the proposed project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.4-5: Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-17
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Adopted Policies and/or Ordinances: No Impact. The City’s Open Space and Conservation Element and Chapter 18 of Municipal Code establish regulations for the preservation and protection of biological resources in the City. The project is consistent with these goals and policies.

Threshold 4.4-6: Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Adopted Habitat Conservation Plans: No Impact. The project will not conflict with Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs), Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCP), or other approved, local, regional, or state biological resource protection plans in place to protect biological resources as there are no such plans in place to protect biological resources within Reche Canyon at this time.

The City of Colton does have a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) established for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly but that HCP is in the western portion of the City and does not affect Reche Canyon.

No No mitigation is required. No
Cumulative Biological Resources Impacts: No Impact. Development of the cumulative list of proposed projects would be subject to Federal, State, Regional and local applicable policies, standards, and regulations pertaining to the protection of biological resources. Furthermore, potential project-related impacts would be addressed by implementing appropriate mitigation measures to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on biological resources.

No No mitigation is required. No

4.5 Cultural Resources
Threshold 4.5-1: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Threshold 4.5-2: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? Historical and Archaeological Resources: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site does not contain any known historical or archaeological resources; however, construction of the project has the potential to inadvertently discover subsurface historical or archaeological resources. Implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.5.1 through 4.5.3 would reduce potential impacts to subsurface historical or archaeological resources to less-than-significant levels.

Yes 4.5.1 Cultural Resources Treatment Plan. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall retain a qualified professional archaeologist to prepare a Cultural Resources Treatment Plan to be submitted to the City for review and approval for its implementation during ground-disturbing activities (e.g., vegetation removal, grading, excavation, and/or trenching) occurring onsite for the purposes of cultural resources monitoring (i.e., archaeological or historical resources).

The Cultural Resources Treatment Plan shall specify (but not be limited to) the following:
z The professional qualification(s) and/or approval of cultural resources monitor(s);
No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-18
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
z The professional standards and procedures to be following during archaeological excavation and/or monitoring;
z The construction schedule, term/schedule of onsite archaeological monitor(s) and the extent of areas and activities to be monitored; z The authority of archaeological monitor(s) to redirect construction activity in the vicinity of any inadvertent discovery;
z The treatment, including recordation, testing and evaluation, and/or retrieval, of any inadvertent discovery;
z Curation of any cultural resources recovered, excluding items covered by the provisions of applicable Treatment Plans or Agreements pursuant to Mitigation Measure 4.18.1;
z The responsibilities of the archaeological monitor(s) including any requirement for the completion of daily monitoring logs and end-of- monitoring reporting;
z Any insurance, specialized training or safety requirement necessary for archaeological monitor(s) working within the proposed construction area.

Should the City (i.e., Lead Agency) determine through consultation with the project archaeologist and Native American tribes that any inadvertent discovery is a potential Tribal Cultural Resource as defined in AB 52, treatment of such resources shall occur in accordance with Mitigation Measures 4.18.1 through

4.18.3 (see EIR Section 4.18, Tribal Resources). This mitigation measure, including the contact information of the project archaeologist, shall be incorporated in all construction contract documentation and be implemented to the satisfaction of the City.

4.5.2 Cultural Resources Treatment Plan Final Monitoring Report. A final monitoring compliance report detailing the implementation of the Cultural Resources Treatment Plan, including, but not limited to, the significance and treatment of discovered cultural resources and associated DPR 523 forms, shall be prepared by the project archaeologist and submitted to the City and the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University Fullerton.

This mitigation measure shall be incorporated in all construction contract documentation and implemented to the satisfaction of the City.

4.5.3 Inadvertent Discovery of Cultural Resources. If any suspected cultural resources are discovered during ground-disturbing activities and the cultural

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-19
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
resources monitor is not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work within a 50-foot radius around the find and call the project archaeologist to the site to assess the significance of the find.

This mitigation measure, including the contact information of the project archaeologist, shall be incorporated in all construction contract documentation and be implemented to the satisfaction of the City.

Thresholds 4.5-3: Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?
Human Remains: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated.

The project site contains no evidence it has been utilized in the past for human burials. If human remains are discovered during grading, the project will comply with State law (Health and Safety Code § 7050.5) (HSC § 7050.5) and Public Resources Code § 5097.98 (PRC § 5097.98). Additionally, implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.5.4 would reduce potential impacts to Native American burials to less-than-significant levels.

Yes 4.5.4 Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains. In the event that human remains (or remains that may be human) are discovered within the construction areas, all activity within 50 feet of the find shall be immediately halted. Any discovery of human remains shall be immediately reported by the Native American monitor(s) to the County Coroner. If the human remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), who shall appoint a Most Likely Descendant in accordance with California Public Resources Code 5097.98.

Further required actions, as determined necessary by the Most Likely Descendant, shall include but shall not be limited to:
z Funerary objects and burned ceremonial remains (cremations) shall be treated in the same manner as bone fragments.
z The discovery of any Native American human remains and/or funerary objects shall be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains and associated funerary objects, sacred objects and/or objects of cultural patrimony shall be covered with an opaque material or placed in opaque cloth bags. A physical barrier (e.g., metal plate, concrete slab that can be moved by heavy equipment) shall be placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains until examination by the Most Likely Descendant can occur. If this type of protective barrier is not available, a 24-hour guard shall be posted outside of working hours.
z The Most Likely Descendant shall complete his or her inspection and make recommendations or preferences for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The Most Likely Descendant shall identify and direct the most appropriate means of treating the human remains and any associated funerary object(s). As determined through consultation with the City, the Most Likely Descendant shall make recommendations that allow the burial to remain in situ and protected.

No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-20
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
z In the event the burial must be removed, the Most Likely Descendant shall work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure the removal of human remains and associated funerary object(s) is conducted carefully, ethically and respectfully. Cremations shall either be removed in bulk or by a means to ensure completely recovery of all material. As approved by the Most Likely Descendant, data recovery documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. As approved by the Most Likely Descendant, additional types of documentation shall be permitted for data recovery purposes.
z Human remains and associated funerary objects shall be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site at a location at a site to be protected in perpetuity identified by the Most Likely Descendant and the City.
z In the event the discovery includes six or more burials, the location shall be considered a cemetery pursuant to California Health and Safety Code (§ 7003) and a treatment plan shall be prepared. The construction contractor shall consult with the Most Likely Descendant regarding avoidance of all such cemetery sites.
z Once complete, a final report of all activities associated with or resulting from the discovery of human remains shall be submitted to the Native American Heritage Commission.

This mitigation measure, including the contact information of the qualified Native American monitor(s), shall be incorporated in all construction contract documentation and be implemented to the satisfaction of the City.

Cumulative Cultural Resources Impacts: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The cumulative area for cultural resources is the Reche Canyon portion of the City of Colton. Past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the City would similarly include ground-disturbing activities with the potential to destroy, damage, or displace surface or previously undiscovered subsurface archaeological and historical resources.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.5.1 through 4.5.4 and Mitigation Measures 4.18.1 through 4.18.3 would reduce potential project-related impacts to such impact to less-than-significant levels. Other cumulative development projects would have similar measures applied during their respective CEQA processes if potential impacts to such resources were identified for those projects. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on archeological and historic resources.

Yes Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.5.1 through 4.5.4.

Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.18.1 through 4.18.3.

No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-21
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?

4.6 Energy
Threshold 4.6-1: Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy during project construction or operation? Energy Consumption: Less than Significant Impact. The project would comply with applicable provisions of the California Building Code (CBC) and CALGreen Code as part of Chapter 15.04 of the City Municipal Code (RCM 4.6.1).

Therefore, project construction and operation would not result in wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary energy consumption.

No 4.6.1 Compliance with Title 13-Section 2449 of the California Code of Regulations and the California Green Building Standards. Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, the City of Colton shall verify that the Project Applicant and his/her contractor(s) submit plans to the City indicating incorporation of Best Available Control Measures during construction of the Project. Best Available Control Measures include, but are not limited to, requirements that the Project Applicant ensure off-road vehicles (i.e., self- propelled diesel-fueled vehicles 25 horsepower and up that were not designed to be driven on road) limit vehicle idling to five minutes or less; and register and label vehicles in accordance with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Diesel Off-Road Online Reporting System; restrict the inclusion of older vehicles into fleets; and retire, replace, or repower older engines or install Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategies (i.e., exhaust retrofits). Additionally, the construction contractor must recycle/reuse at least 65 percent of the construction material (including, but not limited to, proposed aggregate base, soil, mulch, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard) and use “Green Building Materials,” such as those materials that are rapidly renewable or resource efficient, and recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way, for at least 10 percent of the project, in accordance with CALGreen regulations. This condition shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City of Colton Development Services Director or designee, and/or Building Official, or designee.

No
Threshold 4.6-2: Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Conflict with a State or Local Plan: No Impact. The project would comply with the CBC and CALGreen Code pertaining to energy conservation standards in effect at the time of construction and the project would be consistent with applicable plans related to renewable energy and energy efficiency.

No No mitigation is required. No
Cumulative Energy Impacts: Less than Significant Impact.The geographic area for electricity service is the SCE boundaries and for natural gas service is the SoCalGas boundaries. Compliance with existing regulatory requirements would ensure that the project would not result in an inefficient, wasteful and unnecessary consumption of energy. Therefore, the project’s contribution to impacts related to the inefficient, wasteful and unnecessary consumption of energy would not be cumulatively considerable.

No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-22
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?

4.7 Geology and Soils
Threshold 4.7-1: Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving the following:
z Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault.

Fault Rupture: Less than Significant Impact. The project site is not within or adjacent to any State of California [Alquist-Priolo] Earthquake Fault Zone.

Therefore, impacts related to fault rupture would be less than significant.

No No mitigation is required No
Threshold 4.7-1: Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving the following:
z Strong seismic ground shaking.
z Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. z Landslides.

Ground Shaking, Liquefication, and Landslides: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The geotechnical investigation concluded the main seismic hazard potentially affecting the project site is from ground shaking and hydrocompaction. State law requires the design and construction of new structures comply with current California Building Code (CBC) requirements which addresses general geologic, seismic, and soil constraints for new buildings. Compliance with the CBC and site-specific recommendations presented in the geotechnical investigation pursuant to Mitigation Measures

4.7.1 through 4.7.2 would reduce impacts related to ground shaking, ground failure/liquefication, and/or landslides to less-than-significant levels.

Yes 4.7.1 California Building Code. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall provide evidence the following note is included on grading and building plans. Project contractor(s) shall comply with provisions of the note:

Construction activities shall occur in accordance with all applicable requirements of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24 (also known as the California Building Standards Code or the California Building Code) in effect at the time of construction.

This note also shall be included in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors. Failure to comply with the California Building Code shall result in the immediate stoppage of earthwork and/or building construction and withholding of occupancy permit until compliance with the California Building Code is demonstrated to the City Engineering Division and/or City Building and Safety Division.

4.7.2 Implementation of Final Site-Specific Geotechnical Measures. Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits, the applicant shall provide to the City Engineer for review and approval detailed grading and construction plans that demonstrate the recommendations specified in project- and site-specific geotechnical investigation(s) previously approved by the City have been incorporated into the onsite earthworks and structures.

The developer and all contractors shall follow the recommendations of the geotechnical investigation, which include but are not limited to 1) a 40-scale geotechnical grading plan review by the project geotechnical engineer prior to construction of the proposed project, 2) preparation of the project site via removal of surface obstructions, vegetation, and debris, 3) removal of No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-23
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
unsuitable or unconsolidated fill materials, 4) overexcavation of surficial units, including artificial fill, colluvium, and topsoil up to five feet below existing grade or four feet below proposed footing bottom, whichever is deeper, to ensure all unsuitable fill is removed prior to replacing it with properly compacted fill, 5) maintenance of properly compacted fill to near optimum moisture content, 6) immediate landscaping, irrigation, and maintenance of any engineered slopes, 7) consultation with a qualified corrosion engineer regarding protection of buried steel or ductile iron piping and conduit or, at a minimum, applicable manufacturer’s recommendations for corrosion protection of buried metal pipe be closely followed, 8) caisson foundation to have a minimum depth of ten feet below the lowest adjacent grade, 9) maintaining appropriate drainage and infiltration throughout the project site in accordance with regulatory requirements, 10) review by the project geotechnical engineer of any updated rough or precise grading or conventional retaining wall or foundation plans to ensure implementation of the recommendations in the geotechnical investigation, and 11) geotechnical observation and/or testing at the following stages of construction:
z During rough grading (removal/over-excavation bottoms, fill placement, etc.);
z Geologic mapping of temporary backcuts;
z During retaining wall backfill and compaction;
z During utility trench backfill and compaction;
z During precise grading;
z After presoaking building pads and other concrete-flatwork subgrades, and prior to placement of aggregate base or concrete;
z Preparation of pavement subgrade and placement of aggregate base; z After building and wall footing excavation and prior to placement of steel reinforcement and/or concrete; and
z When any unusual soil conditions are encountered during any construction operation.

Threshold 4.7-2: Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Soil Erosion or Loss of Topsoil: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Disturbance of surface soils by site preparation and construction could result in loss of soil through wind and water erosion. In accordance with Yes Refer to Mitigation Measure 4.7.2 and Regulatory Compliance Measures 4.10.1 and 4.10.3
No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-24
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure 4.7.2, the project applicant will be required to prepare and submit detailed grading plans prepared in conformance with applicable standards of the City prior to issuance of grading permits. Additionally, development of the project site would involve the disturbance of more than one acre. Therefore, the project is required to obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit (CGP) pursuant to Regulatory Compliance Measure

4.10.1 (as detailed in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality), including the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to identify and implement the Best Management Practices (BMPs) required to address impacts associated with erosion from on-site grading. Finally, as required by Regulatory Compliance Measure 4.10.3 (as detailed in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality), the project will prepare and implement a project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), which will prescribe post-construction measures to address impacts associated with soil erosion or loss of topsoil during project operation.

Threshold 4.7-3: Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
Seismic-Related Ground Failure: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site consists of granitic alluvium. The geotechnical investigation indicated soils on the project site have a low potential for liquefication and lateral spreading under seismic conditions. Additionally, the geotechnical investigation indicated near-surface soils on the project site are moderately compressible (collapsible soil) under saturated conditions.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.7.1 and 4.7.2 would ensure the project is constructed in accordance with current CBC requirements and would comply with recommendations contained in the project-specific geotechnical investigation. Therefore, impacts resulting from landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefication, or soil collapse would be reduced to less-than- significant levels.

Yes Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.7.1 and 4.7.2. No
Threshold 4.7-4: Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
Expansive Soils: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. All soils observed on the project site are relatively granular with an expansion index between 0 and 20 per American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Yes Refer to Mitigation Measure 4.7.2. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 258
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-25
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Test Method D4829 and therefore considered to be non-critically expansive.

Out of an abundance of caution, the project-specific geotechnical investigation identified recommendations to minimize the project site soils’ shrink/swell potential. These recommendations are prescribed in Mitigation Measure 4.7.2 and would ensure the project’s impacts related to expansive soils would be reduced to less-than-significant levels.

Threshold 4.7-5: Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Septic Tanks: No Impact. The project would connect to the existing wastewater collection system, and no septic systems are proposed.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.7-6: Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Paleontological Resources: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is underlain by alluvial sand, gravel, and clay of valley areas (Qa) covered in soil. Based on the geology of the site, construction of the project would not affect, either directly or indirectly, any known unique paleontological resource or site of unique geologic features. Given the site’s history of disturbance, the potential for undiscovered paleontological or geological resources is considered low. However, ground-disturbing activities at the project site still have the potential to disturb previously unknown resources.

Therefore, Mitigation Measure 4.7.3 is required in the event that unanticipated paleontological resources are unearthed during project construction. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.7.3, impacts related to paleontological resources would be reduced to less-than-significant levels.

Yes 4.7.3 Inadvertent Discovery of Paleontological Resources. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City of Colton shall verify that the following note is included on the construction plans:
“If paleontological resources are encountered during the course of ground disturbance, work within 60 feet of the find shall be halted and an exclusionary buffer shall be established. A qualified paleontologist shall be contacted to assess the find for scientific significance. No ground-disturbing activity within the 60-foot exclusionary buffer may occur without the consent of the paleontologist and the City of Colton. If determined to be significant, the fossil(s) shall be collected from the field. The paleontologist may also make recommendations regarding additional mitigation measures, such as paleontological monitoring. Scientifically significant resources shall be prepared to the point of identification, identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible, cataloged, and curated into the permanent collections of a museum repository. If scientifically significant paleontological resources are collected, a report of findings shall be prepared to document the collection.”
No
Cumulative Geology and Soil Impacts: Less than Significant Impact. The cumulative area for geologic and soils issues is the City of Colton and the San Bernardino Valley, and due to the larger context of seismicity, this portion of Southern California. The presence of regional faults and potential for seismic shaking create the potential for damage to structures or injury to persons during seismic events. However, City and State regulations provide guidelines for development in areas with geologic constraints and ensure that the design of buildings is in accordance with applicable CBC standards and other applicable standards, which reduces potential property damage and human safety risks to No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 259
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-26
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
less-than-significant levels. All development projects, including the project, would be required to adhere to applicable State regulations, CBC standards, and the design and siting standards required by local agencies. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on geology and soils.

4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Threshold 4.8-1: Would the project generate GHG emissions either directly or indirectly that may have a significant impact on the environment? Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Less than Significant Impact. Greenhouse gas emissions generated from project construction and operation would not exceed the SCAQMD Tier 3 Threshold of 3,000 CO2e. Therefore, the project would not result in a significant impact on the environment from greenhouse gas emissions.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.8-2: Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Greenhouse Gas Plan, Policy, and Regulation Consistency: Less than Significant Impact. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan air quality policies and SCAG RTP/SCS performance measures. Therefore, the project would not be inconsistent with a plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.

No No mitigation is required No
Cumulative Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impacts: Less than Significant Impact.

The assessment of project generated GHG emissions can only analyzed from a cumulative context. Therefore, the analysis focuses on the project’s incremental contribution of GHG emission to cumulative climate change impacts. The project would not conflict with any local or State plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions and because GHG impacts are cumulative by nature the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on greenhouse gas emissions.

No No mitigation is required No

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Threshold 4.9-1: Would the project create a significant hazard to the public through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Routine Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Materials: Less than Significant Impact. During the construction and operation of the project, hazardous and potentially hazardous materials commonly used at construction sites would likely be routinely transported, used, and disposed of at the project No No mitigation is required No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-27
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
site. The project includes a gas station which would require the installation of underground storage tanks (USTs) containing gasoline. Accordingly, the project would develop a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan administered by the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District, as applicable, in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 25507 and other local, state, and federal standards, ordinances, and regulations. The project also would comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws that inherently safeguard life and property from potential hazards related to the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials. Therefore, project impacts would be less than significant.

Threshold 4.9-2: Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Reasonably Foreseeable Upset and Accidental Release of Hazardous Materials: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is currently vacant and does not appear to have supported improved structures. The Phase I ESA did not identify any documented storage or usage of hazardous materials on site. The proposed gas station use would be required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations regarding hazardous materials and would also require permitting and monitoring by San Bernardino County Fire Protection District as the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for San Bernardino County. Due to the variety of human activities that occurred in the canyon in the past, it is possible that waste materials or remnants of former improvements may be found during grading. Impacts in this regard are potentially significant and Mitigation Measure 4.9.1 is prescribed to reduce impacts to less than significant levels.

Yes 4.9.1 Inadvertent Discovery of Buried Hazardous Materials. In the event any subsurface feature, material, former improvement, etc. is found during grading or construction that cannot be clearly identified as non-hazardous, work shall be halted in that area until a qualified environmental professional is retained to identify the material and determine if it is hazardous as defined by the California Code of Regulations Title 22 Section 66262.11. In the event the material is determined to be non-hazardous, no further action is required. If the material is found to be hazardous, the qualified environmental professional shall determine the nature and extent of the material, the potential risk of removal, and other appropriate steps to effectively remediate and dispose of any hazard materials found during grading and construction. An Excavation, Disposal and Restoration Plan shall be prepared by a certified professional for the site on behalf of the owner of the site to address remediation of contaminated soils at the site. The workplan shall describe the logistical procedures and field work that will be carried out to excavate and dispose of the soil contaminated with hazardous materials and restoration of the site. Excavation and removal shall be performed by a California-licensed hazardous substances removal contractor.

The environmental professional shall direct and coordinate any disposal of hazardous materials according to applicable state and federal laws and regulations (Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations and Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations), including disposal at a landfill approved for such material. Written results of any testing, remediation, or removal shall be provided to the City Development Services Department within 30 days of such action.

No
Threshold 4.9-3: Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
Existing or Proposed Schools: No Impact. The nearest school is approximately

0.8 mile northeast of the project site. Therefore, the project would have no No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-28
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
impact related to hazardous materials on existing or proposed schools located within one-quarter mile of the project site.

Threshold 4.9-4: Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code § 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
Located on a List of Hazardous Materials Sites: No Impact. The project site is not listed in any of the searched regulatory databases provided by Environmental Data Resources (EDR) or the State Cortese List (California Government Code Section 65962.5). Therefore, no impact would occur.

No No mitigation is required No
Threshold 4.9-5: Would the project be located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, resulting in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
Airport Land Use Plan or Within Two Miles of a Public Airport: No Impact. The nearest airport to the project is the San Bernardino International Airport (SBIA), located approximately 4.5 miles northeast of the project site. The project is located outside of any safety zones associated with the SBIA. Therefore, the project is not located within two miles of a public airport or within an airport land use plan and no impact would occur.

No No mitigation is required No
Threshold 4.9-6: Would the project impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Conflict with Emergency Response Plans: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Construction activities may temporarily restrict vehicular traffic due to partial lane closures along Reche Canyon Road, which is identified as an evacuation route in the City. Mitigation Measure 4.17.1 requires the Construction Contractor to prepare and implement a Transportation Management Plan (TMP), which would include provisions to maintain traffic flow along Reche Canyon Road, safe access into and out of the project site, and emergency access to the project site and adjacent areas during construction.

The proposed project includes improvements to Reche Canyon Road and at project area intersections that would improve traffic flow through Reche Canyon. Therefore, the proposed project would not negatively impact the capacity of City roadways or the ability to evacuate the project site and/or community in a safe and timely manner during a wildfire emergency.

Yes Refer to Mitigation Measure 4.17.1. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-29
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Additionally, the proposed site design would facilitate site access, including constructing a fourth leg at the Reche Canyon Road/Shadid Drive intersection to provide an emergency access only driveway to the project site, and internal movement of emergency apparatus and personnel to the sides of every building. The proposed project would also comply will all applicable policies related to emergency access. Therefore, the proposed project’s site design would provide adequate emergency vehicle and personnel access to, from, and within the site. Finally, because the proposed project would not impact emergency evacuation and access in, out and around the project site, the project would not negatively impact evacuation timing.

With implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.17.1, construction and operation of the proposed project would not physically interfere or impair an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan.

Threshold 4.9-7: Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
Wildland Fire Risks: Less than Significant Impact. All development within the City is required to comply with Chapter 15.16 (Fire Code) of the City Municipal Code. Additionally, the project is located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) and would be required to comply with Section 2.28.100 of the City Municipal Code, which requires the project to abate any condition identified by the City fire code official as a fire hazard. The project also would be constructed in accordance with Chapter 7A of the CBC and would incorporate construction techniques and materials such as roofs, eaves, exterior walls, vents, appendages, windows, and doors hardened to protect people and structures from wildland fires. Compliance with these mandatory regulations ensure the project would have a less than significant impact on wildland fire risks.

No No mitigation is required. No
Cumulative Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Implementation of Mitigation Measure

4.9.1 and adherence to policies mandated by the City, including the enforcement of existing local, State, and federal practices applicable to businesses that transport, sell, or use hazardous materials, would ensure that no cumulative impact would result from the construction and operation of the project. Additionally, development of other planned projects within the City of Colton also would be required to adhere to the existing laws and regulations regarding the use, storage, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials and Yes Refer to Mitigation Measure 4.9.1. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-30
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
waste. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact associated with hazards or hazardous materials.

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
Threshold 4.10-1: Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
Violate Water Quality Standards: Less than Significant Impact. Construction of the project would disturb surface soils, potentially resulting in erosion and sedimentation, which could affect water quality. To ensure project construction would not degrade water quality, the project would be required to obtain coverage under the current Construction General Permit (CGP) and Groundwater Discharge Permit, if applicable, as required by RCMs 4.10.1 and

4.10.2, respectively. In accordance with the MS4 permit, the project would prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and incorporate onsite drainage control structures and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to comply with applicable federal, State, and local water quality requirements during project operation, as required in RCM 4.10.3. Therefore, the project would not violate any water quality standard during construction or operation.

No 4.10.1 Construction General Permit. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall submit evidence to the City that coverage under the current State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Order No. 2022-0057-DWQ, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System No.

CAS000002) (Construction General Permit) has been obtained. As required by the Construction General Permit, the project applicant shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City of Colton, San Bernardino County Flood Control District, and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for review and approval.

The SWPPP shall identify pre- and post-construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent the release of sediment and pollutants into downstream waterways and the compliance with all applicable General Permit requirements.

BMPs to be implemented may include (but shall not be limited to) the following:
z Sediment discharges from the project site may be controlled by the following: sandbags, silt fences, straw wattles and temporary debris basins (if deemed necessary), and other discharge control devices. The construction and condition of the BMPs are to be periodically inspected by the RWQCB during construction, and repairs would be made as required. z Materials that have the potential to contribute non-visible pollutants to storm water must not be placed in drainage ways and must be placed in temporary storage containment areas.
z All loose soil, silt, clay, sand, debris, and other earthen material shall be controlled to eliminate discharge from the site. Temporary soil stabilization measures to be considered include covering disturbed areas with mulch, temporary seeding, soil stabilizing binders, fiber rolls or blankets, temporary vegetation, and permanent seeding. Stockpiles shall be surrounded by silt fences and covered with plastic tarps.
z The SWPPP shall include inspection forms for routine monitoring of the site during the construction phase.
z Additional required BMPs and erosion control measures shall be documented in the SWPPP.

No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-31
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
z The SWPPP must be kept on site for the duration of project construction and shall be available to the local RWQCB for inspection at any time.

4.10.2 Dewatering Permit. At least 45 days prior to groundwater dewatering activities, the Construction Contractor shall submit an NOI to the Santa Ana RWQCB to obtain coverage under the General Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges to Surface Waters That Pose an Insignificant (De Minimis) Threat to Water Quality (Groundwater Discharge Permit), Order No. R8-2020-0006, NPDES No. CAG998001. Groundwater dewatering activities shall comply with all applicable provisions in the Groundwater Discharge Permit, including water sampling, analysis, treatment (if required), and reporting of dewatering-related discharges. Upon completion of groundwater dewatering activities, a NOT shall be submitted to the Santa Ana RWQCB.

4.10.3 Final Water Quality Management Plan. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, a final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), as required by RWQCB Order No. R8-2010-0036, NPDES NO. CAS618036 (MS4 permit). The final Water Quality Management Plan shall identify necessary site design BMPs, source control BMPs, LID BMPs, and treatment control BMPs (if applicable).

Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval evidence that project plans incorporate the facilities, features and/or BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department and Planning Division as appropriate.

Threshold 4.10-2: Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Groundwater: Less than Significant Impact. The project would include an infiltration basin designed to retain and infiltrate 100 percent of the design capture volume in accordance with the MS4 Permit (RCM 4.10.3). The City’s water supply, including the project site, is comprised of groundwater extracted from three adjudicated basins: the Bunker Hill Basin (part of the San Bernadino Basin Area), the Rialto-Colton Basin, and the Riverside-Arlington Basin (Riverside North Basin Portion). The City of Colton Water Department’s Urban Water Management Plan indicates there is ample groundwater to support the operation of the project. Additionally, these basins are designated by the Department of Water Resources as very low priority basins. Therefore, the No Refer to Regulatory Compliance Measures 4.10.3. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 265
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-32
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
project would not decrease groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge.

Threshold 4.10-3: Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
z Result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; z Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite;
z Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or
z Impede or Redirect Flood Flows?
Drainage Patterns: Less than Significant Impact. The project would increase the impervious area on the project site, which could result in erosion and flooding. However, as prescribed in RCMs 4.10.1 and 4.10.3, the project would be required to comply with the CGP and MS4 Permit requirements and would incorporate an infiltration basin that would be used for stormwater control, treatment, and infiltration. Therefore, impacts related to adding impervious surfaces would be less than significant during project construction and operation.

No Refer to Regulatory Complianc e Measures 4.10.1 and 4.10.3. N o Threshold 4.10-4: Would the project in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
Flood, Tsunami, and Seiche Zones: Less than Significant Impact. The project site is in a canyon area along the west side of Reche Canyon Road and south of Crystal Ridge Lane in the City of Colton. According to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Map No. 06071C8694H, the portions of the project site are located in Zones AE and X of the Reche Canyon Creek 100-year floodplain.

During construction, BMPs would be implemented to ensure storm water runoff pollutants would be retained on site and be prevented from reaching downstream receiving waters (RCM 4.10.1). During operations, an infiltration basin would provide storm water treatment and would be designed to retain and infiltrate 100 percent of the required design capture volume in accordance with the MS4 Permit (RCM 4.10.3). Additionally, the project site is not located near any large bodies of water, water tanks, or dams. Therefore, the project No Refer to Regulatory Compliance Measures 4.10.1 and 4.10.3. N o

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-33
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
would not result in a risk of the release of pollutants from a flood, tsunami, seiche, or dam inundation.

Threshold 4.10-5: Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Conflict with a Water Quality Control Plan or Groundwater Management Plan:

Less than Significant Impact. The project site is within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The Santa Ana RWQCB adopted a Basin Plan that designates beneficial uses for all surface and groundwater within its jurisdiction and establishes the water quality objectives and standards necessary to protect those beneficial uses. The project would comply with the CGP (RCM 4.10.1), Groundwater Discharge Permit requirements (RCM 4.10.2), and the MS4 Permit (RCM 4.10.3) by implementing construction and operational BMPs to reduce pollutants of concern in storm water runoff during project construction and operation. Therefore, the project would not conflict with a water quality control plan. The City’s water supply is comprised from groundwater extracted from 3 basins (e.g., Bunker Hill Basin [part of the San Bernadino Basin Area], the Rialto-Colton Basin, and the Riverside-Arlington Basin [Riverside North Basin Portion]), all of which are designated as very low priority basins. Therefore, the development of Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSPs) for these basins is not required pursuant to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with a sustainable groundwater management plan.

No Refer to Regulatory Complianc e Measures 4.10.1, 4.10.2, and 4.10.3. No Cumulative Hydrology and Water Quality Impacts: Less than Significant Impact. Cumulative development in the Upper Santa Ana Watershed is a continuation of the existing urban pattern of development that has already resulted in extensive modifications to watercourses in the area. The area’s watercourses have been either channelized or left in natural conditions and drainage systems have been put into place to respond to the past urbanization that has occurred in this area. The project and related projects could potentially increase the volume of storm water runoff and contribute to pollutant loading in storm water runoff reaching the City’s storm drain system, the Santa Ana River, and Santa Ana Watershed, thereby resulting in cumulative impacts to hydrology and surface water quality. However, because the project and other cumulative projects would be required to comply with applicable NPDES requirements and would include BMPs to reduce the volume of storm water runoff and pollutants of concern in storm water runoff as specified by Regulatory Compliance Measures 4.10.1, 4.10.2, and 4.10.3, the proposed No Refer to Regulatory Compliance Measures 4.10.1, 4.10.2, and 4.10.3. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 267
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-34
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
project would not have cumulatively considerable impacts on hydrology and water quality.

4.11 Land Use and Planning
Threshold 4.11-1: Would the project physically divide an established community?
Physically Divide an Established Community: No Impact. The project site is part of the existing RCSP, the very idea of which is to create and develop a cohesive community. While the project site is currently designated for residential uses, developing the site as neighborhood serving commercial would provide neighborhood commercial services to the existing residences. Therefore, the proposed project would retain the intended connectivity of the uses within the RCSP and would not physically divide the established community.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.11-2: Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Conflict with Applicable Land Use Plans, Policies, or Regulations Adopted for The Purpose of Avoiding or Mitigating an Environmental Effect: Less than Significant Impact. The project is consistent with the overall goals of the RCSP, the City of Colton General Plan, and other relevant plans such as the Southern California Area of Governments Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Plan. By providing neighborhood commercial services, the project would provide additional employment opportunities in the local area, reduce regional traffic, help finance the Reche Canyon Road realignment project, and make improvements to the pedestrian facilities along Reche Canyon Road at the location of the project site. Although the project does not require a General Plan Amendment in order to develop the proposed uses on the project site, the project does require a General Plan Amendment to change the land use on a parcel outside of the Reche Canyon Specific Plan (APN 163-172-48, which is located at 635 S. 7th Street) to allow for the development of up to 9 dwelling units on the subject site to compensate for the loss in residential capacity (6 dwelling units) on the project site in compliance with SB 330.

No No mitigation is required No
Cumulative Land Use and Planning Impacts. Less than Significant Impact. The project would be consistent with applicable plans, goals, policies, and regulations of the City of Colton’s General Plan and Reche Canyon Specific Plan, and consistent with the Southern California Area of Governments Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Cumulative development projects must also comply with relevant land use plans, goals and No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-35
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
policies as part of the project-specific CEQA reviews. Therefore, the proposed project would not have cumulatively considerable impacts associated with land use and planning.

4.12 Mineral Resources
Threshold 4.12-1: Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
Loss of Availability of a Known Mineral Resource: No Impact. Development of the project site would not result in the loss of identified regional or local mineral resources that would be of value to the region. There are no local or regional mineral resources in the project area.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.12-2: Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
Loss of Locally Designated Mineral Resource Site: No Impact. The project would have no impact related to the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. No locally important mineral resources are identified in Colton according to the City and County General Plan documents.

Additionally, there are no identified or proposed mineral resource extraction uses within Reche Canyon.

No No mitigation is required No
Cumulative Mineral Resources Impacts: No Impact. Due to the absence of mineral resources both locally and in the region, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively significant impact on mineral resources.

No No mitigation is required. No

4.13 Noise
Threshold 4.13-1: Would the project generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Noise Levels in Excess of Established Standards: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project would not result in short-term construction-related impacts associated with worker commutes and transport of construction equipment and material to the project site.

The closest residential property line is located approximately 50 ft from the project construction boundary, and residences may be subject to short-term construction noise reaching up to 88 dBA Lmax (84 dBA Leq) in this location. Since Yes 4.13.1 Hours of Construction. The construction contractor shall limit construction activities to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Construction shall be prohibited outside these hours and on Sundays and federal holidays.

4.13.2 Construction Equipment Noise BMPs. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit evidence to the City for review and approval, that the following measures are included on the grading plan cover sheet:

The construction contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers (e.g., are not old, broken or loose) consistent with manufacturers’ standards.

No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-36
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
noise generated by project construction activities would temporarily be higher than ambient noise levels, noise impacts from the project construction activities would be potentially significant. Therefore, the implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.13.1 and 4.13.2, that limit project construction activities to the allowable daytime hours and limiting noise from construction equipment as much as possible, is required.

The project-related traffic noise would increase noise along Reche Canyon Road by up to 0.1 dBA. Noise level increases less than 3 dBA are not perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, traffic noise impacts from project-related traffic on off-site sensitive receptors would be less than significant.

Stationary noise generating activities associated with the project would include the car wash, fueling activities, parking activities, truck delivery and truck- unloading activities, and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment. The noise levels generated from the car wash would be 67.7 dBA Leq, which exceeds the City’s noise standard of 65 dBA Leq, and the cumulative increase in noise levels from all stationary sources would increase by approximately 11.3 dBA. This increase in noise would be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, the project is required to implement Mitigation Measure 4.13.3, which requires development of a minimum 9-foot-high wall along the project’s western property line between the commercial/retail building and the car wash/convenience store building, to reduce project-related noise levels to 63.9 dBA Leq (refer to Table 4.13.P in Section 4.13, Noise and Vibration).

The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.

The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that the emitted noise is directed away from the sensitive receptors nearest the project site.

4.13.3 Noise Wall. Prior to City approval of the final site plan, the site plan shall be revised to include a minimum 9 ft high wall located along the project’s western property line between the commercial/retail building and the car wash/convenience store building as part of the project design. The noise wall shall be designed and constructed to be continuous with no gaps or holes and have a minimum density of 4 pounds per square foot.

Threshold 4.13-2: Would the project generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Groundborne Vibration/Groundborne Noise Impacts: Less Than Significant Impact. Construction-related vibration impacts discusses the level of human annoyance and the potential for building damage. Construction of the proposed project would not cause vibration levels that could be experienced by neighboring residential or commercial buildings. Vibration levels would also not result in building damage because vibration levels would not exceed the FTA vibration damage threshold.

Project operations would not generate vibration. In addition, vibration levels generated from project-related traffic on the adjacent roadway (Reche Canyon Road) would be unusual for on-road vehicles because the rubber tires and suspension systems of on-road vehicles provide vibration isolation. Therefore, No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-37
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
vibration generated from the project or project-related traffic would be less than significant.

Threshold 4.13-3: If the project is located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Public/Private Airport Noise: No Impact. The project would not expose people working in the project area to excessive noise levels because the project site is not located near a private airstrip and is located outside the airport noise contour for San Bernardino International Airport, Flabob Airport, Redlands Municipal Airport, and March Air Reserve Base.

No No mitigation is required. No
Cumulative Noise Impacts: Less than Significant Impact. Adherence to the City’s Municipal Code provisions and other development standards that regulate nuisance noise from land uses along with project-specific mitigation would reduce contributions of the project to potential cumulative noise impacts. Furthermore, it is reasonable to conclude that each project on the cumulative project list will be required to identify and mitigate noise such that exterior and interior noise levels do not exceed established City standards at any noise-sensitive use. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable noise impact.

No No mitigation is required. No

4.14 Population and Housing
Threshold 4.14-1: Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Population Growth: Less Than Significant Impact. The project includes an amendment to the RCSP land use designation from Estate Density residential to Commercial to allow the proposed neighborhood retail commercial center. To comply with SB 330, the project requires a General Plan Amendment for a parcel outside of the Reche Canyon Specific Plan (APN 163-172-48, which is located at 635 S. 7th Street) to compensate for the loss in residential capacity imposed by the project’s action. However, the General Plan Amendment required as part of the project would not increase the City’s population beyond what is anticipated in the City’s General Plan. The development of commercial uses on the project site would not induce a substantial population because the project is anticipated to generate a small number of jobs (27 to 29 employment No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-38
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
positions) which would be filled by existing Colton residents. The project would not indirectly induce population growth because it does not propose new or expansion of existing infrastructure. Therefore, the proposed project would not induce a substantial increase in population over that which was envisioned in the RCSP build out or build out of the City’s General Plan.

Threshold 4.14-2: Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Displace Substantial Numbers of Existing People or Housing: No Impact. No displacement of housing or residents would occur with implementation of the project. The project site is currently undeveloped. No residential uses currently exist onsite.

No No mitigation is required. No
Cumulative Population and Housing Impacts: No Impact. The project would include an amendment to the RCSP land use designation from Estate Density residential to Commercial to allow the proposed neighborhood retail commercial center. The project site is vacant and would not remove existing housing nor would the project add new housing; rather by developing neighborhood serving commercial uses, the project would add up to 29 new jobs in lieu of up to 20 new residents in a city currently considered “jobs poor.” Therefore, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on population and housing.

No No mitigation is required. No

4.15 Public Services and Facilities
Threshold 4.15-1: Would the proposed project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered law enforcement facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for police services? Police Services: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated.

Construction activities on the project site have the potential to affect police services, such as increasing emergency vehicle response times along Reche Canyon Road due to potential lane closures/detours and increasing service calls to the site due to potential criminal activity (e.g., theft of construction materials) during non-construction hours. Implementation of a Traffic Management Plan (Mitigation Measure 4.17.1) would ensure that project construction would not substantially affect emergency vehicle response times.

Additionally, implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.1.1, would ensure that construction materials on the project site would be protected from theft Yes Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.1.1 and 4.17.1. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-39
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
through the installation of a 6-foot-high fence enclosing the project site, which would be locked during non-construction hours.

The project site is undeveloped. Development of the proposed commercial uses would generate between approximately 22 and 29 new employment positions, which are anticipated to be filled by City residents. Therefore, the project would not increase the City’s population, which could place a higher demand for police protection services. Placing development of any kind at a currently undeveloped site could result in an incremental increase in police services calls.

However, the project site is designated for development as part of the RCSPs and therefore, the proposed project would not result in a higher demand for police protection services beyond what was anticipated and planned for at this location.

Threshold 4.15-2: Would the proposed project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered fire-fighting facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for fire services? Fire Protection: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated.

Construction activities on the project site have the potential to affect fire protection services, such as increasing emergency vehicle response times along Reche Canyon Road due to potential lane closures/detours. Implementation of a Traffic Management Plan (Mitigation Measure 4.17.1) would ensure that project construction would not substantially affect emergency vehicle response times.

The project site is undeveloped. Development of the proposed commercial uses would generate between approximately 22 and 29 new employment positions, which are anticipated to be filled by City residents. Therefore, the project would not increase the City’s population, which could result in a higher demand for fire protection services. Placing development of any kind at a currently undeveloped site could result in an incremental increase in the demand for fire protection services. However, the project site is designated for development as part of the RCSPs and therefore, the proposed project would not result in a higher demand for fire protection services beyond what was anticipated and planned for at this location. Additionally, the project would incorporate project design features in accordance with applicable City and Fire Code requirements designed to reduce fire risk on the project site.

Yes Refer to Mitigation Measure 4.17.1. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-40
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Threshold 4.15-3: Would the proposed project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered school facilities, need for new or physically altered school facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives? Schools: Less than Significant Impact.The project is a commercial use facility that is anticipated to employ existing residents within the City and Reche Canyon. Therefore, the project would not generate any school-aged children.

Additionally, the project would be required to pay development fees in accordance with Government Code 65995 and Education Code 17620. Impacts on existing or future schools would be less than significant.

No No mitigation is required No
Threshold 4.15-4: Would the proposed project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives?
Other Public Facilities: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project is not expected to increase the City’s population; therefore, the project would not result a demand for more services at City-owned facilities, including City Hall and libraries, beyond what was anticipated and planned for at the project site.

Therefore, the construction of new or expansion of existing library or other governmental facilities would not be required.

No No mitigation is required. No
Cumulative Public Services and Facilities Impacts. Less than Significant Impact.

All cumulative development within the service areas of the City of Colton’s Police and Fire Departments would be required to adhere to conditions established by these agencies and would be subject to applicable fees that will contribute to the maintenance of their facilities. The project would result in the development of uses that are typical of those currently present in the service area for the City of Colton’s Police and Fire Departments and does not include any use or structure anticipated to disproportionally increase service demand beyond that which currently exists. The Colton Unified School District (FUSD) requires the payment of development fees to provide for maintenance of existing and the expansion or construction of new facilities. Additionally, all new development is required to provide school impact fees at the level identified by the FUSD. Since the projected increase in population generated by the proposed project would not result in the need for a physical expansion, No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-41
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
modification, or off-site construction of public facilities when considered in conjunction with other cumulative development, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on public services and facilities.

4.16 Recreation
Threshold 4.16-1: Would the project result in increased use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities where substantial physical deterioration would occur or be accelerated? Threshold 4.15-2: Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
Increased Use of Existing Recreational Facilities or Require Construction or Expansion of Recreational Facilities: Less than Significant Impact. The project proposes the development of commercial uses that would generate up to 29 employees on a site which is currently vacant. The nearest public park in proximity to the project site is Prado Park located at 3000 East Prado Lane approximately 1.25 miles north of the project site. Given the distance to the nearest public park from the project site, it is unlikely employees of the proposed project would increase the use of Prado Park when compared to existing conditions. The project is located adjacent to a bicycle trail along Reche Canyon Road. Due to the project site’s proximity to the bicycle trail, project generated employees may increase the use of this trail. However, given the relatively low number of employees on the project site, the increased use of the trail would not result in substantial physical deterioration of the trail.

The proposed project does not include the construction of recreation facilities.

Project employment positions are anticipated to be filled by existing City residents and therefore would not increase the City’s population or affect the City’s parkland standard. Therefore, the proposed project would not require the construction of new or expanded recreational facilities in the City.

No No mitigation is required. No
Cumulative Recreation Impacts: Less than Significant Impact.Implementation of the proposed project in combination with other projects in the City would increase use of existing parks and recreation facilities. However, as future residential development is proposed, the City would require developers to provide the appropriate amount of parkland or pay the in-lieu fees, which will contribute to future recreational facilities. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on park and recreational facilities.

No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-42
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?

4.17 Transportation
Threshold 4.17-1: Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
Conflict with a Transportation Program, Plan or Ordinance: Less than Significant Impact.

Trip Generation. The proposed project is estimated to generate 1,246 daily trips, with 66 trips occurring during the a.m. peak hour and 98 trips occurring during the p.m. peak hour after accounting for pass-by trips. According to the City’s General Plan Mobility Element Policy M-3.5, the City uses LOS D as its minimum level of service criteria for intersections. The proposed project would implement improvements at five study area intersections, which would result in an acceptable LOS at all but one intersection (Reche Canyon Road/Shahid Drive). However, the proposed improvements at this intersection would improve the level of service at this intersection when compared to baseline conditions. Therefore, the proposed project would be partially consistent with Policy M-3.5. Additionally, automobile delay on City roadways does not constitute a significant environmental impact pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(a).

Pedestrians. Generally, pedestrian facilities in proximity to the project site are fragmented and to not facilitate adequate pedestrian access from the site to neighboring commercial and residential uses. The project includes frontage improvements along Reche Canyon Road to include curb and gutter, sidewalks, street trees, and lighting.

Bicycle Facilities. There are no designated bikeways along roadways adjacent to the project site or within the project vicinity. However, the City’s General Plan Mobility Element designates Reche Canyon Road as a Bicycle Street and planned Class II bikeway from Washington Street to the southern City limit.

Ultimate buildout of Reche Canyon Road will occur at the discretion of the City and will include the addition of Class II bikeways in accordance with the City General Plan. Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the City’s bicycle facilities system.

Transit Services. There are no bus service routes along Reche Canyon Road. The proposed project would be site specific and would not require new transit stops or the significant relocation of existing transit stops. Implementation of the No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-43
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
proposed project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the transit services system.

Threshold 4.17-2: Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): No Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b) establishes “vehicle miles traveled” (VMT) criteria in lieu of LOS for analyzing transportation impacts and was signed into law as Senate Bill (SB) 743 in 2013. The City’s VMT Guidelines provides multiple screening criteria for land use projects within Section 2.1, Screening Analysis of the VMT Guidelines.

As recommended under the subsection ‘Land Use Type’ of the project screening criteria, local-serving retail projects with an area of less than 50,000 square feet are assumed to have a negligible impact upon the City’s VMT profile. Since the project is a local-serving retail project and has an area of less than 50,000 square feet (18,124 square feet), the project would have a negligible impact on the City’s VMT and can be screened out from further VMT analysis.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.17-3: Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Hazardous Roadway Design Features or Incompatible Uses: Less than Significant Impact. The design of the proposed project does not include any geometric design features or incompatible uses that could substantially increase circulation/traffic hazards. The project site is infill adjacent to existing single family residential uses and commercial uses to the south. Development of the site as proposed would improve pedestrian facilities along the project site frontage and facilitate walkable access to the site from commercial uses to the south and surrounding residential uses. The proposed project would not increase roadway hazards due to a geometric design feature or be incompatible or obstruct the use of farm equipment.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.17-4: Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Inadequate Emergency Access: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project includes construction of improvements along Reche Canyon Road, which may require temporary lane closures and interfere with emergency access. Mitigation Measure 4.17.1 requires the Construction Contractor to prepare and implement a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) during project construction. The TMP includes provisions to maintain traffic flow along Reche Canyon, safe access into and out of the project site, and emergency access to the site and adjacent areas during construction activities.

Yes 4.17.1 Traffic Management Plan. Prior to the commencement of grading activities, the Construction Contractor shall prepare a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) to the satisfaction of the City of Colton and shall ensure that the plan is implemented during construction with the goal of maintaining safety and adequate traffic operations to roadways affected by construction traffic. The TMP shall be consistent with the California Temporary Traffic Control Handbook (CATTCH) (previously known as the California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual). At a minimum, the TMP shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-44
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.17.1 would ensure that adequate emergency access to, from, and within the site is maintained during project construction.

The proposed project’s site design includes two project driveways and one emergency access only driveway, project frontage improvements along Reche Canyon Road, emergency access around the entire perimeter of the site, and emergency access within the site, including access to the sides of every building on the project site. The project’s site design plans would be subject to review and approval by the SBCFPD, City Police Department, City Traffic Engineer, and Public Works Department during the City’s plan review process. Therefore, the proposed project would be designed and developed to provide adequate emergency access during project operation.
z Provisions for temporary traffic control to improve traffic flow on public roadways and ensure the safe access into and out of the site (e.g., warning signs, lights and devices, and flag personnel);
z Prohibiting construction-related vehicles from parking on public streets; z Providing safety precautions for pedestrians, equestrians, and bicyclists through such measures as alternate routing and protection barriers; z Obtaining the required permits for truck haul routes from the City of Colton and/or the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans); and z Maintaining unobstructed emergency access to the project site and adjacent areas during all phases of construction. Flag personnel shall be trained to assist in emergency response by restricting or controlling the movement of traffic that could interfere with emergency vehicle access.

Cumulative Traffic Impacts: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in less than significant impacts relating to conflicts with the circulation system, vehicle miles traveled, roadway design hazards, and emergency access. Other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects in the region would be required to meet standard requirements to provide transportation facilities that accommodate both pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle travel. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on transportation.

No No mitigation is required. No

4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Threshold 4.18-1: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is:
z Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code § 5020.1(k), OR
z A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Yes 4.18.1 Native American Monitoring Agreement. At least 30 days prior to the commencement of ground-disturbing activity, the construction contractor shall provide a Native American Monitoring Agreement with interested tribes to the City for review and approval. The Native American monitoring agreement shall be developed in consultation with the appropriate Native American tribal contact(s) of the interested tribes and shall identify (but not be limited to) the following:
z The professional qualification(s) and/or approval of Native American monitor(s);
z The professional standards and procedures to be following during archaeological excavation and/or monitoring;
z The construction schedule, term/schedule of onsite Native American monitor(s) and the extent of areas and activities to be monitored; No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-45
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Tribal Cultural Resources: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. According to project-specific Cultural Resources Assessment, there are no historic-era resources located within the project site.

The City conducted Tribal consultation consistent with AB 32 and SB 18. During the consultation process the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians suggested monitoring by a qualified cultural resources monitor occur during pre-construction and construction ground disturbance. The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians also declined further consultation at this time based on their assessment of the project location. However, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians did request several Mitigation Measures to be added to the cultural and tribal cultural discussions of the environmental document, including the handling of unanticipated cultural finds and human remains.

The City did receive a response from the Morongo Band of Mission Indians requesting continued consultation on the project regarding SB 18. The City responded to the request by providing a copy of the confidential Archaeological Site Survey Record (33-001067) to the Tribe on May 24, 2019. No additional requests from the Tribe have been made to date. No further comments were received.

Ground disturbance activities” may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, weed abatement, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching within the project area. Development of the project requires extensive ground-disturbing activity. Due to the depth and extent of onsite grading, this activity may unearth previously unrecorded tribal cultural resources, the discovery of which would be a potentially significant impact. As part of the consultation process, the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians tribes have each provided the City with measures to mitigate for any potential impact to tribal cultural resources. z The responsibilities of Native American monitor(s) including any requirement for the completion of daily monitoring logs and end-of-monitoring reporting; z The authority of Native American monitor(s) to redirect construction activity in the vicinity of any inadvertent discovery;
z The method and/or terms of compensation (if any) for Native American monitor(s); and
z Any insurance, specialized training or safety requirement necessary for Native American monitor(s) working within the proposed construction area.

This mitigation measure shall be incorporated in all construction contract documentation and implemented to the satisfaction of the City.

4.18.2 Inadvertent Discovery of Native American Cultural Resources. Any archaeological resource unearthed by construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist outlined in Mitigation Measure 4.5.1 and the Native Monitor(s). If the resources are Native American in origin, the interested tribe or tribes shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources.
z If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a “unique archaeological resource” pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources.
z Preservation in place by accommodating onsite reburial of the discovered items with the interested tribes. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts. Reburial shall not occur until all cataloguing and recordation efforts have been completed. z A curation agreement with an appropriate qualified repository within San Bernardino County that meets federal standards per 36 CFR Part 79. The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to an appropriate curation facility within San Bernardino, to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation.

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-46
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
This mitigation measure shall be incorporated in all construction contract documentation and implemented to the satisfaction of the City.

4.18.3 Native American Monitor. If any suspected Native American cultural resource is discovered during ground-disturbing activities and the Native American monitor is not present, construction activities within 50 feet of the suspected resource supervisor shall be halted. The Native American monitor shall be notified of the suspected discovery immediately.

This mitigation measure, including the contact information of the qualified Native American monitor(s), shall be incorporated in all construction contract documentation and be implemented to the satisfaction of the City.

Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.5.1 through 4.5.4.

Cumulative Tribal Cultural Resources Impacts: Less than Significant Impact.

With implementation of all applicable provisions of SB 18 and AB 52, Native Americans would be able to identify appropriate mitigation to reduce and/or avoid impacts prior to the development of the proposed project and other projects in the City. Therefore, the proposed project would not have cumulatively considerable impacts on Tribal Cultural Resources.

No No mitigation is required. No

4.19 Utilities and Service Systems
Threshold 4.19-1: Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater treatment, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Threshold 4.19-3: Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Wastewater: Less than Significant Impact. Based on a generation rate of 1,080 gallons of wastewater per day, the project would contribute up to approximately 0.02 percent of the current surplus treatment capacity of the Colton Water Reclamation Facility (CWRF). Therefore, the CWRF has the capacity treat wastewater generated by the project.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.19-1: Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-47
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Threshold 4.19-2: Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
Water Supply: Less than Significant Impact. The project site is located within the service area of The City of Colton Water Department. The City of Colton Water Department service area encompasses approximately 14.8 square miles, providing over 10,200 municipal water service connections in 2020, providing water to approximately 46,500 people. The City of Colton obtains its water supply solely from groundwater. The proposed project’s water demand is estimated to be 1,408 gallons per day (GPD) or 513,920 gallons or 1.58 acre-feet per year.

In the 2015 San Bernardino Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan, total water demand for the City of Colton is 9,008 acre-feet for the year 2020, and of that total, according to the Upper Santa Ana River Watershed Integrated Regional Urban Water Management Plan, 3,555 acre-feet are reserved for commercial uses.

Water use estimates for the City of Colton indicate that the City would not experience any shortage in available water supply under single dry or consecutive dry year conditions. Therefore, there is water available for the project during normal, single dry, and multiple dry years over the next 25 years and impacts associated with water supply would be less than significant.

Threshold 4.19-1: Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded storm water drainage facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Storm Water Drainage Facilities: Less than Significant Impact. The City requires all storm water facilities of the proposed project to interconnect with existing municipal storm water conveyance facilities. The precise interconnection locations are determined at the precise plan stage, but they are expected to occur either on site or within the Reche Canyon Road right-of-way in areas already disturbed and developed with infrastructure. The City requires all line size modifications or interconnections to be designed in accordance with applicable provisions of the City Municipal Code and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

No Refer to Regulatory Complianc e Measures 4.10.1 and 4.10.3. N o

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-48
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
The necessary on-site and off-site storm water facilities are included as design features of the project and are analyzed within the footprint of the site and buildout of Reche Canyon Road width along the site frontage. Furthermore, compliance with construction- and operation-phase storm water requirements, as set forth in RCM 4.10.1 and 4.10.3, would ensure post-development storm water runoff volume would not exceed the existing, pre-developed condition.

Therefore, the project would not result in the need to upgrade storm water drainage facilities in addition to those already analyzed in this environmental document.

Threshold 4.19-1: Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Electricity, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would tie into existing electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure that exists along Reche Canyon Road adjacent to the site. Such connections may require trenching within the Reche Canyon Road right-of-way; however, construction to connect to existing electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure would occur in previously disturbed areas and within the analytical footprint of the proposed project. Implementation of the proposed project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications infrastructure that would cause significant environmental effects.

No No mitigation is required. No
Threshold 4.19-4: Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Threshold 4.19-5: Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Solid Waste: Less than Significant Impact. Solid waste collection is a “demand- responsive” service and current service levels can be expanded and funded through user fees without difficulty. Solid waste from the proposed project would be hauled by CR&R Environmental Services, Inc. to their Inland Regional Material Recovery Facility where waste would be sorted into recyclable and non-recyclable materials and disposed of. Solid waste that is collected and not recycled would be disposed of at several landfills – El Sobrante Landfill, San Timoteo Landfill, and Mid Valley Landfill.

No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-49
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Construction activities occurring on the project site would generate solid waste, of which at least 65 percent of non-hazardous material would be diverted to a material recycling facility. Operational waste for commercial uses is calculated using the generation rate of 5 pounds per 1,000 square feet of commercial land use per day, generating 93.85 pounds (0.05 ton) of operational waste per day.

The 0.05 ton of solid waste per day is below the maximum permitted daily tonnage accepted by the El Sobrante, San Timoteo, and Mid Valley Landfills; as such, existing landfills would adequately serve the project site.

Per the California Green Building Code (CALGreen), a minimum of 65 percent of debris would be diverted to a material recycling facility, thus reducing the input of solid waste to the receiving landfills. The project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals.

Cumulative Impacts to Utility Services and Systems. Less than Significant Impact.

Wastewater. Cumulative development would not exceed the capacity of the wastewater treatment system because the CWRF currently has the carrying capacity for the wastewater that would be generated from this development project.

Water Supply. Increases in population, square footage, and intensity of uses would contribute to increases in the overall regional water demand. Based on the water consumption rates provided for recent residential and non-residential projects in the City of Colton and the current and projected water supply for the City, the City has sufficient water supplies available for the proposed project and the cumulative projects.

Storm Drain Facilities. Increased impervious surfaces are likely to alter existing hydrology and increase potential pollutant loads. However, all future development in the City of Colton and throughout the Santa Ana RWQCB will be required to comply with the requirements of the NPDES permit program.

Continued growth is anticipated to occur in the City and surrounding areas and all new development and significant redevelopment will be required to minimize its individual impacts to storm water drainage and pollutant transport through implementation of BMPs.

No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-50
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
Electricity, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications. Cumulative projects identified in Table 2.A and the proposed project would also be required tie into existing electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure. None of the cumulative projects listed in Table 2.A are large enough to have significant impacts on electricity, natural gas and/or telecommunications facilities. The proposed project when combined with the cumulative projects would not make a significant contribution to any cumulatively considerable impacts on electric, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure.

Solid Waste. AB 341 mandates the reduction of solid waste disposal in landfills.

Solid waste from the proposed project and cumulative projects would be hauled by CR&R Environmental Services, Inc. to their Inland Regional Material Recovery Facility where waste would be sorted into recyclable and non- recyclable materials and disposed of. In addition, the proposed project and cumulative projects would be required to coordinate with the waste hauler to develop collection of recyclable materials for the project on a common schedule as set forth in applicable local, regional, and State programs.

The proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact on utilities and service systems.

4.20 Wildfire
Threshold 4.20-1: Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

Impair an Emergency Plan: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is in a Local Responsibility Area (LRA) Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone designated area. The proposed project’s impacts on an adopted emergency response or emergency evacuation plans during project construction and operation have been evaluated in accordance with the State’s 2022 Wildfire Guidance.

The City designates Reche Canyon Road as an evacuation route. Therefore, construction of improvements along Reche Canyon Road could require partial lane closures, which could impact traffic flows and/or emergency access during a community evacuation. However, the Construction Contractor would be required to prepare and implement a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) (Mitigation Measure 4.17.1), to be reviewed and approved by City staff, that would include provisions to maintain traffic flow along Reche Canyon Road, safe access into and out of the project site, and emergency access to the project site and adjacent areas during construction. Additionally, Mitigation Measure

4.20.1, which requires the preparation of a project-specific Fire Protection Plan Yes Refer to Mitigation Measure 4.17.1.

4.20.1 Fire Protection Plan. Prior to commencement of grading activities, the project owner shall prepare a Fire Protection Plan (FPP) for City review and approval. At a minimum, the FPP shall include the following:
z A list of all major fire hazards, proper handling and storage procedures for hazardous materials, potential ignition sources and their control, and the type of fire protection equipment necessary to control each major hazard; z Procedures to control accumulations of flammable and combustible waste materials;
z Procedures for regular maintenance of safeguards installed on heat- producing equipment to prevent the accidental ignition of combustible materials;
z The name or job title of employees responsible for maintaining equipment to prevent or control sources of ignition or fires;
z The name or job title of employees responsible for the control of fuel source hazards;
No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-51
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
(FPP), would ensure that people on the project site during construction would know when and how to evacuate the project site during a wildfire emergency, thereby reducing the project’s impacts on evacuation timing, need for alternative evacuation plans and impacts on existing evacuation plans. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.17.1 and Mitigation Measure 4.20.1, construction-related impacts associated with impairments to an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan would be less than significant.

Due to the small size and types of uses proposed on the site, the project is not anticipated to generate a substantial number of customers or employees at any one time during project operations. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to generate a substantial number of vehicles needing to evacuate the site during a wildfire emergency and/or contribute a substantial amount of traffic along Reche Canyon Road during an emergency. Additionally, the proposed project includes roadway improvements along Reche Canyon Road and intersection improvements at five study area intersections within the vicinity of the project site to improve traffic flows under normal and emergency traffic conditions when compared to existing conditions. The project also includes three project driveways, one of which would be used for emergency access only and could also be used as an additional exit driveway for passenger vehicles during an evacuation. Finally, the proposed project would be required to prepare a FPP (Mitigation Measure 4.20.1), which would include a project-specific evacuation plan, thereby reducing the project’s impacts on evacuation timing, the need for alternative evacuation plans, and impacts to existing evacuation plans. The FPP would also require the project to implement fire reducing measures, including the use of fire-resistant materials and a fuel modification plan. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.20.1, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact to an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan.
z Fire protection infrastructure and equipment to be provided on site, including fire hydrant placement;
z Information regarding water supply and available flows during a wildfire; z Information regarding evacuation routes, alternative evacuation routes; and z Information regarding allowable building materials and defensible space, building ignition and fire resistance, and building fire protection systems.

Threshold 4.20-2: Would the project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire.

Exacerbate Wildfire Risks Due to Slope, Prevailing Winds, and Other Factors:

Less than Significant Impact. Under existing conditions, wildfires may potentially occur within the project area due to fire-prone vegetation, wind conditions, and steep hillsides. However, the project site is relatively flat and is No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-52
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
not immediately adjacent to the neighboring hills, canyons, or densely vegetated areas.

The proposed project would convert fuel-prone surface area (e.g., weedy vegetation) to paved surfaces, thereby limiting ignition potential. Additionally, the proposed project would be developed in accordance with applicable CBC, California Fire Code, and City Municipal Code regulations, including ignition- resistant materials and incorporation of fire sprinklers, to reduce the risk of wildfires in the project vicinity.

The project would introduce new potential ignition sources in the form of building materials (e.g., wood), vegetation for landscaping, vehicles, small machinery (e.g., for typical commercial and landscape maintenance), and gasoline, but would also result in a large area separating ignition sources from native fuels. Therefore, the project would function as a fuel reduction area by helping create context-sensitive development and a new first-fuel break line of defensible space.

Therefore, project impacts related to exacerbating wildfire risks due to slope, prevailing winds, or other factors would be less than significant.

Threshold 4.20-3: Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Exacerbate Wildfire Risks Due to the Installation or Maintenance of Infrastructure: Less than Significant Impact. Potable, recycled water, and wastewater infrastructure would be installed on the project site and improvements to existing infrastructure would be modified and/or extended throughout the site. Project design and implementation of utility improvements would be reviewed and approved by the City’s Public Works Department as part of the project’s approval process to ensure the proposed project is compliant with all applicable fire codes, design standards, and regulations.

The project site plan includes very little vegetation that could be a source of fire. The internal roads and parking areas would reduce fire risk. Furthermore, the project site would be developed in accordance with applicable CBC, California Fire Code, and City Municipal Code regulations that require “fire- hardened” structures, which would also reduce the fire risk at the project site.

No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-

R ECHE C ANYON PLAZA PROJECT

C ITY OF C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA

D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT
S EPTEMBER 2023
Chapter 1.0 Executive Summary 1-53
Table 1.D: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Issues/Impacts
Significant
Before
Mitigation?
Mitigation Measure(s)
Significant
After
Mitigation?
In addition, the project applicant would prepare a Fire Protection Plan (FPP) to address water supply/availability, fire water flow, and hydrant placement, defensible space, building ignition and fire resistance, and fire protection systems, among other pertinent fire protection criteria. The FPP would be reviewed and verified by the City to ensure compliance with local and State codes.

Therefore, the proposed project would not require the installation or maintenance of infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risks or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment.

Threshold 4.10-4: Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, postfire slope instability, or drainage changes? Expose People or Structures Significant Risks: Less than Significant Impact. If a wildfire should spread to the project site, the proposed project would contribute any additional runoff or sedimentation to the on-site natural drainages or other downstream drainages. This is due to the lack of steep slopes prone to landslides or erosion on the project site and the fact that the proposed project’s drainage improvements would remain intact after a major wildfire, allowing them to continue to reduce the potential for flooding conditions in downstream storm drain facilities. Therefore, downslope or downstream flooding as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes would not expose occupants or structures to significant risks.

No No mitigation is required. No
Cumulative Impacts to Wildfire. Less than Significant Impact. Potential impacts of the proposed project regarding wildfire, when combined with the impacts of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects in the City of Colton, could contribute to a cumulatively significant impact due to the increased risk of wildfire and impacts to resources and human life because of wildfire. However, the proposed project and all related projects are required to adhere to City, County, State, and federal regulations designed to reduce and/or avoid impacts related to wildfire including flooding hazards and landslides after a wildfire event. With compliance with these regulations, the proposed project would not have cumulatively considerable impacts related to wildfire.

No No mitigation is required. No

1.1.j
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Attachment 10_Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001- Project Plan Set with Site Plan, Floor Plan, Building Elevations and Conceptual Landscape Plan.

ATTACHMENT 11

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.2 0.8

0.3 0.3

1.1 2.5

1.7 0.7

0.4 0.2

1.5 0.1

0.1 2.8

2.1 5.8

5.2 0.6

2.1 4.0
15 .4

2.0 1.16.7

3.4 2.6

0.5 19.7

0.7 1.6

0.4 0.4

0.6 1.6

3.4 0.4

0.9 1.6

0.6 1.1

0.7 0.4

0.9 2.2

1.3 0.5

1.0 2.7

0.6 1.7

2.5 0.4

0.9 0.8

2.1 0.7

0.8 2.2

0.4 1.3

2.9 2.4

0.8 0.6

1.4 1.4

0.6 0.6

1.1 1.6

0.9 0.7

1.2 1.3

0.8 0.5

0.9 2.2

3.1 2.7

1.4 1.0

1.2 1.5

2.3 2.0

3.9 2.9

3.4 2.4

1.1 0.7

0.8 1.2

1.2 1.0

0.8 0.6

0.8 1.3

2.7 0.6

1.0 1.4

1.3 1.1

0.7 0.5

0.5 0.6

0.7 0.9

1.0 1.0

0.4 0.4

0.5 0.6

0.8 0.9

0.9 0.7

0.8 1.4

2.3 2.7

5.7 3.1

2.7 3.6

2.8 1.4

1.0 0.7

0.4 0.6

1.2 2.0

2.4 1.7

0.9 0.7

3.5 3.6

2.2 1.8

2.0 1.8

1.5 1.3

1.5 1.5

0.9 1.2

2.7 1.8

1.7 1.5

1.3 1.1

0.8 0.7

1.1 2.7

4.2 1.9

0.7 0.5

0.8 1.3

1.5 1.5

1.2 1.1

1.3 1.7

0.6 0.9

2.5 3.9

1.2 1.1

2.8 3.5

2.5 1.2

1.5 6.1

0.9 0.7

1.4 3.4

1.3 0.4

1.3 1.4

0.8 1.6

0.8 0.8

1.3 1.4

0.8 0.9

0.7 3.0

1.3 1.8

1.0 5.3

5.7 5.3

3.8 2.9

1.1 0.8

1.9 2.5

2.2 2.3

2.7 1.2

0.9 1.7

2.7 1.9

1.5 1.3

1.5 3.0

0.8 1.0

0.3 0.3

26.4 6.7

7.9 8.0

17.2 12.6

24.1 16.1

7.7 29.0

14.5 22.7

13.9 12.1

9.0 11.3

8.7 8.6

8.8 8.7

11.9 8.8

12.4 13.4

24.0 14.6

9.4 15.2

25.0 12.5

17.7 9.0

9.3 5.2

7.2 5.1 29.9
S1-3
S1-5
S1-6
S1-8
S1-9
S1-10
S1-11
S1-14
S1-15
S1-16
S1-17
S1-18
S2-1
W1
-1
W1-2
W1-3
W1-4
W1-5
W1-6
W1-7
W1-8
W1-9
W1-10
W1-11
W1-12
W1-13
W1-14
S1-19
S1-20
S1-21
S1-22
F1-1
F1-4
F1-5
F1-6
F1-7
F1-8
Plan
View
Sc
ale - 1" = 40ft

RECHE CANYON

EXTERIOR LIGHTINNG PLAN
012020
De
signer
STEVE

DOMINGUEZ
805-701-8156Date
6/15/2015
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.

Summary
1 of
2 Sche
dule
Sym
bol Label QTY Manufacturer Catalog Number Description Lamp Number Lamps
Lumens
per Lamp LLF Wattage
S1
16 AN
P LIGHTING VW524-P046LD 4 N T3
30K PM30

20.25"DIA. X 18"H. TOP MOUNT

SUSPENDED LED LUMINAIRE
LED 1 5661 0.95 47.68
S2
1 AN
P LIGHTING VW524 P046LD 4 N T3
30K PM40 BD4S16

20.25"DIA. X 18"H. TOP MOUNT

SUSPENDED LED LUMINAIRE
LED 1 5661 0.95 95.36
W1
14 TMS LIGHT
ING INC. 2W-O-19LED-30K-WM-
DIML
CALVIN WALL MOUNT LUMINAIRE 16" DIA.

ALUMINUM REFLECTOR WHITE POLYESTER

POWDER COAT ON INNER SURFACE
LED 9 207 0.95 21.5
F1
6 Li
thonia Lighting CNY LED P3 40K MVOLT CNY LED Canopy P3=11,100lm 216 10755 0.95 86.58 Stat
istics
De
scription Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min

CARWASH
DRIVE

THROUGH

1.0 fc 2.8 fc 0.1 fc 28.0:1 10.0:1
GAS PUMPS 13.3 fc 29.9 fc 5.1 fc 5.9:1 2.6:1

PARKING
LOT 1.7 fc 26.4 fc 0.3 fc 88.0:1 5.7:1
STORE
FRONT 5.1 fc 19.7 fc 0.5 fc 39.4:1 10.2:1
Lum
inaire Locations
N
o. Label X Y Z
Location
MH Tilt Orientation
1 F1 5018.93 5788.64 10.96 11.30 0.00 79.10
4 F1 5046.88 5794.95 10.96 11.30 0.00 79.10
5 F1 5023.71 5767.21 10.96 11.30 0.00 79.10
6 F1 5051.63 5773.39 10.96 11.30 0.00 79.10
7 F1 5028.55 5745.66 10.96 11.30 0.00 79.10
8 F1 5056.47 5751.84 10.96 11.30 0.00 79.10
3 S1 5083.01 5671.41 16.00 16.00 0.00 0.00
5 S1 4953.13 5800.73 16.00 16.00 0.00 78.11
6 S1 4967.21 5731.88 16.00 16.00 0.00 78.69
8 S1 4954.55 6020.24 16.00 16.00 0.00 258.88
9 S1 4971.26 5932.20 16.00 16.00 0.00 258.88
1 S2 5002.95 5863.69 16.00 16.00 0.00 144.35
10 S1 4842.87 6112.43 16.00 16.00 0.00 166.60
11 S1 4861.23 6041.80 16.00 16.00 0.00 347.35
14 S1 4889.29 5997.15 16.00 16.00 0.00 80.43
15 S1 4906.40 5902.43 16.00 16.00 0.00 80.43
16 S1 4853.57 6186.29 16.00 16.00 0.00 222.31
17 S1 4913.96 6101.24 16.00 16.00 0.00 249.12
18 S1 4806.22 6255.66 16.00 16.00 0.00 149.19
19 S1 4896.69 5705.21 16.00 16.00 0.00 69.21
20 S1 5023.66 5678.92 16.00 16.00 0.00 271.69
21 S1 5108.11 5737.93 16.00 16.00 0.00 236.10
22 S1 5071.36 5810.33 16.00 16.00 0.00 240.90
1 W1 4910.70 5850.88 11.00 11.00 0.00 17.74
2 W1 4906.83 5872.72 11.00 11.00 0.00 96.23
3 W1 4899.48 5913.13 11.00 11.00 0.00 96.23
4 W1 4895.90 5932.38 11.00 11.00 0.00 96.23
5 W1 4877.13 6035.72 12.00 12.00 0.00 166.95
6 W1 4879.40 6022.82 12.00 12.00 0.00 170.47
7 W1 4882.04 6010.18 12.00 12.00 0.00 0.00
8 W1 4957.96 5741.71 14.00 14.00 0.00 100.18
9 W1 4959.21 5727.28 11.00 11.00 0.00 0.00
10 W1 4954.06 5760.42 14.00 14.00 0.00 100.18
11 W1 4948.92 5773.76 11.00 11.00 0.00 0.00
12 W1 4937.83 5838.14 12.00 12.00 0.00 197.88
13 W1 4893.47 5800.42 12.00 12.00 0.00 208.76
14 W1 4895.10 5766.22 9.00 9.00 0.00 160.76

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

RECHE CANYON

EXTERIOR LIGHTINNG PLAN
012020
De
signer
Michael Blackmon
805-937-8676
Date
XX/XX/2018
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.

Summary
2 of
2 1.1.k
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Focused Street Improvement Plans for Reche Canyon Drive ATTACHMENT 12

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) RETAIL9,800

RECHE CANYON PLAZA---------------------------------------------RECHE CANYON ROADSTREET IMPROVEMENT EXHIBITSAN BERNARDINO CO

SAN BERNARDINO COCITY OF COLTON

SAN BERNARDINO COCITY OF COLTON
CITY OF COLTONC-STORECARWASH3,0002,095
CITY OF COLTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTPLAN NO. 1628011 RECHE CANYON PLAZASTREET AND STRIPING EXHIBITADDRESS: AT RECHE CANYON ROAD S/O SHADID DR.SCALEHORIZ: AS SHOWNVERT: N/ADATE:DATEAPPR.REVISIONSCITY ENGINEER413 MACKAY DRIVESAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92408PH. (909) 384-7464FAX (909) 384-7475

VICINITY MAPPROJECT
01/09/2024

PAVEMENT LEGEND
LEGEND

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

EXHIBIT ALEGEND

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

EXHIBIT BLEGEND

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

EXHIBIT CLEGEND

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Conceptual Fire Access Plan
ATTACHMENT 13

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453)

C-STORE

CARWASH
3,000
1,750
RETAIL9,800

RECHE CANYON PLAZA---------------------------------------------FIRE ACCESS PLAN

SAN BERNARDINO CO

SAN BERNARDINO COCITY OF COLTON

SAN BERNARDINO COCITY OF COLTON

CITY OF COLTON
F.H.

F.H.

EXIST. F.H.

EXIST. F.H.

EXIST. F.H.

CITY OF COLTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTPLAN NO. 1628011RECHE CANYON PLAZAFIRE ACCESS PLANADDRESS: AT RECHE CANYON ROAD S/O SHADID DR.SCALEHORIZ: AS SHOWNVERT: N/ADATE:DATEAPPR.REVISIONSCITY ENGINEER413 MACKAY DRIVESAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92408PH. (909) 384-7464FAX (909) 384-7475MICHAEL ACKERMAN RCE NO. 64663 DATE: 7-30-2018

VICINITY MAPPROJECT
06/06/2022

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) Conceptual Storm Drainage Plan
ATTACHMENT 14

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) RETAIL9,800

RECHE CANYON PLAZA---------------------------------------------SITE PLAN

SAN BERNARDINO CO

SAN BERNARDINO COCITY OF COLTON

SAN BERNARDINO COCITY OF COLTON
CITY OF COLTONC-STORECARWASH3,0002,095
CITY OF COLTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTPLAN NO. 1628011 RECHE CANYON PLAZASITE IMPROVEMENT PLANADDRESS: AT RECHE CANYON ROAD S/O SHADID DR.SCALEHORIZ: AS SHOWNVERT: N/ADATE:DATEAPPR.REVISIONSCITY ENGINEER413 MACKAY DRIVESAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92408PH. (909) 384-7464FAX (909) 384-7475

VICINITY MAPPROJECT
12/14/2023

1.1.k
Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Attachments 11-14_Project Plans_Renderings_DAP-001-453 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP-001-453) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Draft

RESOLUTION NO. R-93-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF COLTON CERTIFYING THE

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE
CLEARINGHOUSE # 2019039115 ) FOR THE RECHE
CANYON PLAZA PROJECT; ADOPTING FINDINGS

PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM. (FILE
INDEX NUMBER DAP-001-453)

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON:

WHEREAS, the proposed Reche Canyon Commercial Plaza Project (“Project”) entails a request for a General Plan Amendment to change existing Land Use from General Commercial to Mixed-Use Downtown and Change of Zone from C-2 (General Commercial) to M-U-D (Mixed- Use Downtown) at 645 S. 7th Street (Assessor Parcel Numbers [APNs] 0163-172-48), approval of an Amendment to the Rec he Canyon Specific Plan to change the onsite land use designation from Estate Density (Residential) to Commercial (APNs 0284-211-70, 71, 72 & 1178 -371-27), a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 24-hour, gasoline service station, drive-through car wash, and convenience store, and an Architectural and Site Plan Review to approve the site plan, site improvements, landscaping plans, and architectural elevations for the proposed retail sales (indoors), convenience store, and gasoline service station with drive-through car wash on property measuring approximately 2.90 acres located at 2501 Reche Canyon Road.

WHEREAS, the project would result in removing Estate Density (Residential) Land Use Designation with 2 units per acre as a maximum density with Commercial Land Use located at 2501 Reche Canyon Road; replacing the proposed residentially zoned property with changing General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone from General Commercial Zone to Mixed Use Downtown Zone with 30 dwelling unit an acre maximum density on 0.31 acre lot located at 645 South 7th Street.

City Council Alternative Action
Attachment 15, 2024

1.1.l
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Alternative Action Attachment 15_CC Reso_R-93-24_DAP-001-453_Final EIRv1 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP- 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Colton City Council Resolution No. R-93-24
DAP-001-453 – Specific Plan Amendment (Colton’s Reche Canyon Specific Plan) September 17, 2024 – Page 2 of 10

WHEREAS, the proposed Project further includes grading of the Project site, construction on Reche Canyon Drive and Old Reche Canyon Drive and installation of utility lines, street paving, curb, gutter and sidewalk/landscaping; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Project requires discretionary approvals from the City, including a Conditional Use Permit and Architectural and Site Plan Review which must be obtained before development of the proposed Project may proceed;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21067 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000, et seq.) (“CEQA”) and section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City determined that an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared in order to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the City issued a Notice of Preparation ( “NOP”) for the Draft EIR that provided for a comment period of over 45 days, from September 9, 2023 to October 24, 2023, and the NOP was sent to each responsible agency, trustee agency, the Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”), and interested parties, including members of the public who had requested such notice ; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15086, the City consulted with and requested comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory agencies, and others during the 45-day public review and comment period; and WHEREAS, the City received a total of 16 letters during the 45 -day public review and comment period, including two letters from San Bernardino County and one from tribal government; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared a Final EIR, consisting of the comments received during the 45-day public review and comment period on the Draft EIR, written responses to those comments, and revisions to the Draft EIR. For the purposes of this Resolution, the “EIR” shall refer to the Draft EIR, as revised by the Final EIR, together with the other sections of the Final EIR; and

1.1.l
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Alternative Action Attachment 15_CC Reso_R-93-24_DAP-001-453_Final EIRv1 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP- 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Colton City Council Resolution No. R-93-24
DAP-001-453 – Specific Plan Amendment (Colton’s Reche Canyon Specific Plan) September 17, 2024 – Page 3 of 10

WHEREAS, on September , 2024, the City Council held a public hearing on the Project, at which all persons wishing to testify were heard, and the City Council voted X-X to recommend that the City Council approve the Project; and
WHEREAS, the environmental impacts identified in the EIR as having no impact or a less- than-significant impact are described in Section 2 hereof; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts identified in the EIR as potentially significant, but which the City finds can be mitigated to a level of less than significant through the incorporation of feasible mitigation measures identified in the EIR and set forth herein, are described in Section 3 hereof; and
WHEREAS, the cumulative impacts of the Project , identified in the EIR and set forth herein, are described in Section 5 hereof; and
WHEREAS, alternatives to the proposed Project that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental impacts are described in Section 8 hereof; and WHEREAS, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program , setting forth the mitigation measures to be implemented in connection with the proposed Project, is adopted in Section 10 below, and is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, the EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council and is deemed adequate for purposes of making decisions on the merits of the Project; and WHEREAS, the City has not received any comments or additional information that constituted substantial new information requiring recirculation of the EIR under Public Resources Code section 21092.1 or State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the proposed Project have been adequately evaluated; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred,

1.1.l
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Alternative Action Attachment 15_CC Reso_R-93-24_DAP-001-453_Final EIRv1 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP- 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Colton City Council Resolution No. R-93-24
DAP-001-453 – Specific Plan Amendment (Colton’s Reche Canyon Specific Plan) September 17, 2024 – Page 4 of 10

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. RECITALS
The recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by reference as findings of fact.

SECTION 2. FINDINGS REGARDING LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS NOT

REQUIRING MITIGATION
Consistent with Public Resources Code section 21002.1 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15128, the EIR focused its analysis on potentially significant impacts, and limited discussion of other impacts for which it can be seen with certainty that there is no potential for significant adverse environmental impacts. State CEQA Guidelines section 15091 does not require specific findings to address environmental effects that an EIR identifies as “no impact” or a “less than significant” impact. Nevertheless, the City Council hereby finds that the Project would have either no impact or a less-than-significant impact to the following resource areas:

A. AESTHETICS

1. Scenic Vistas
Threshold: Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Findings: Less-than-significant impact. (Draft EIR, Section 4.1 through 4.1.8) Explanation: Although the project would modify the currently vacant project site by adding buildings and landscaping, the change in visual character would be consistent with the surrounding development and not significantly alter views of or to the project site, or obstruct any designated scenic vista/viewshed; therefore, the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on views of scenic vistas; impacts associated with scenic views and vistas would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. (Draft EIR, Sections 4.1 through 4.1.8 )

2. Scenic Resources within a State Scenic Highway
Threshold: Would the Project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Findings: No impact. (Draft EIR, Sections 4.1 through 4.1.8) Explanation: The project would not significantly alter scenic resources such as trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings on the site. In addition, there is no State designated (or eligible) scenic highway or local scenic road would be affected by the proposed development, no impact related to this issue would occur. No mitigation is warranted. (Draft EIR, Section 4.1.6.2)

1.1.l
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Alternative Action Attachment 15_CC Reso_R-93-24_DAP-001-453_Final EIRv1 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP- 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Colton City Council Resolution No. R-93-24
DAP-001-453 – Specific Plan Amendment (Colton’s Reche Canyon Specific Plan) September 17, 2024 – Page 5 of 10

B. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES

1. Farmland Conversion
Threshold: Would the Project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Finding: Less-than-significant impact. (Draft EIR, Sections 4.2 through 4.2.8) Explanation: No current agricultural use occurs on site, and neither the site nor nearby properties in the surrounding Reche Canyon has been used for agricultural purposes in the past.

Due to the lack of trees, there also are no forestland or forest resources on site. Therefore, the development of the project would not convert agricultural land to non-agricultural uses of the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. (Draft EIR, Section 4.2.6.4)

The project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to nonagricultural uses. According to the State Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), no land on or adjacent to the project site is designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide importance. (Draft EIR, Section 4.2.6.1) Agricultural Zoning
Threshold: Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or with a Williamson Act contract?
Finding: Less-than-significant impact. (Draft EIR, Section 4.2.6) Explanation: The project would have no impact on agriculturally zoned land or a Williamson Act contract; therefore, no mitigation is required. (Draft EIR, Section 4.2.6.2)

2. Forestland Zoning
Threshold: Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?
Finding: No impact. (Draft EIR, 4.1.6.3)
Explanation: The project would have no impact to forest or timberland resources; therefore, no mitigation is required. (Draft EIR, 4.1.6.3)

3. Loss of Forest Land
Threshold: Would the Project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Finding: No impact. (Draft EIR, Section 4.2.6.4)

1.1.l
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Alternative Action Attachment 15_CC Reso_R-93-24_DAP-001-453_Final EIRv1 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP- 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Colton City Council Resolution No. R-93-24
DAP-001-453 – Specific Plan Amendment (Colton’s Reche Canyon Specific Plan) September 17, 2024 – Page 6 of 10

Explanation: The Project site does not contain forest land and is not designated as forest land. (Draft EIR, Section 4.2.6.4.)

4. Indirect Conversion
Threshold: Would the Project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non -agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Finding: Less-than-significant impact. (Draft EIR, Section 4.2.6.4) Explanation: The project would have no impact to the environment from conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use, or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. No mitigation is required.. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.2-12 through 4.2.6.4)

C. AIR QUALITY

1. Air Quality Management Plan Consistency
Threshold: Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
Findings: Less-than-significant impact. (Draft EIR, Section 4.3.6.1) Explanation: The proposed project would not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standard violation or cause a new violation (see Impact 4.3.6.2 below) and is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the AQMP. Impacts would be less than significant, and mitigation is not required. (Draft EIR, Section 4.3.6.1.)

2. Criteria Pollutant Emissions
Threshold: Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Findings: Less-than-significant impact. (Draft EIR, Section 4.3.6.2.) Explanation: Without any exceedance in air quality emissions thresholds, the construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant air quality impacts. Cumulative air quality impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation is not required.. (Draft EIR, Section 4.3.6.2.)

3. Sensitive Receptors
Threshold: Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Findings: Less-than-significant impact. (Draft EIR,Section 4.3.6.3)

1.1.l
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Alternative Action Attachment 15_CC Reso_R-93-24_DAP-001-453_Final EIRv1 (4699 : Reche Canyon Commercial Project - DAP- 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Colton City Council Resolution No. R-93-24
DAP-001-453 – Specific Plan Amendment (Colton’s Reche Canyon Specific Plan) September 17, 2024 – Page 7 of 10

Explanation: Tables 4.3.J and 4.3.K identify the on -site construction and operational emissions of NOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5, respectively, at the project site and demonstrate that all concentrations of pollutants would be below the SCAQMD thresholds of significance for construction and operation of the project. Therefore, both short -term (i.e., construction) and longterm (i.e., operational) LST air quality impacts would be less than significant, and the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial polluta nt concentrations. Mitigation is not required. (Draft EIR, Section 4.3.6.3)