Agenda packet — Compton City Council, July 12, 2022 (part 13 of 13)

A-weighted decibel (dBA)
A sound measurement scale that adjusts the pressure of
individual frequencies according to human sensitivities. The scale accounts for the fact that the region of highest sensitivity for the human ear is between 2,000 and 4,000 cycles per second (hertz).

Hertz (Hz) The frequency of the pressure vibration, which is measured in cycles per second.

Kilo hertz (kHz) One thousand cycles per second.

Equivalent sound level (Leq)
The sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given time period. The Leq is the value that expresses the time averaged total energy of a fluctuating sound level. Leq can be measured over any time period, but is typically measured for 1-minute, 15-minute, 1-hour, or 24-hour periods.

Community noise equivalent level (CNEL)
A rating of community noise exposure to all sources of sound that differentiates between daytime, evening, and nighttime noise exposure. These adjustments add 5 dBA for the evening, 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM, and add 10 dBA for the night, 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM.

The 5- and 10-dB penalties are applied to account for increased noise sensitivity during the evening and nighttime hours. The logarithmic effect of adding these penalties to the 1 -hour Leq measurements typically results in a CNEL measurement that is within approximately 3 dBA of the peak-hour Lean
a
Nighttime (Lights) Lights is the average noise exposure during the hourly periods from 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM.

Sound pressure level
The sound pressure is the force of sound on a surface area perpendicular to the direction of the sound. The sound pressure level is expressed in dB.

Ambient noise
The level of noise that is all encompassing within a given environment, being usually a composite of sounds from many and varied sources near to and fa r from the observer. No specific source is identified in the ambient environment.
a California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement; A Technical Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, (Sacramento, California: November 2009), pp. N51–N54.

A doubling of sound energy results in a 3 dBA increase in sound, which means that a doubling of sound wave energy (e.g., doubling the volume of traffic on a roadway) would result in a barely perceptible change in sound level. In general, changes in a noise level of less than 3 dBA are not noticed by the human ear.1 Changes from 3 to 5 dBA may be noticed by some individuals who are extremely sensitive to changes in noise. An increase of greater than 5 dBA is readily noticeable, while the human ear perceives a 10 dBA increase in sound level to be a doubling of sound volume.

1 US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (USDOT FHWA), Fundamentals and Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise (Springfield, VA: Author, September 1980), 81.

Alameda Street Compton Project 4 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022
Noise sources can generally be categorized in two types: (1) point sources, such as stationary equipment; and (2) line sources, such as a roadway. Sound generated by a point source typically diminishes (attenuates) at a rate of 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from the source to the receptor at acoustically hard sites, and at a rate of 7.5 dBA at acoustically soft sites. 2 A hard or reflective site consists of asphalt, concrete, or very hard-packed soil, which does not provide any excess ground-effect attenuation. An aco ustically soft or absorptive site is characteristic of normal earth and most ground with vegetation. As an example, a 60 -dBA noise level measured at 50 feet from a point source at an acoustically hard site would be 54 dBA at 100 feet from the source and 48 dBA at 200 feet from the source. Noise from the same point source at an acoustically soft site would be 52.5 dBA at 100 feet and 45 dBA at 200 feet from the source. Sound generated by a line source typically attenuates at a rate of 3 dBA and 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance from the source to the receptor for hard and soft sites, respectively.3 In addition, man-made or natural barriers can also attenuate sound levels.

Fundamentals of Vibration
Vibration is commonly defined as an oscillatory motion through a solid medium in which the motion’s amplitude can be described in terms of displacement, velocity, or acceleration. The peak particle velocity (PPV) or root-mean-square (RMS) velocity is typically used to describe vibration amplitudes. PPV is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal, while RMS is defined as the square root of the average of the squared amplitude of the signal. PPV is typically used for evaluating potential building damage, whereas RMS is typically more suitable for evaluating human response to ground-borne vibration. The RMS vibration velocity level can be presented in inches per second (ips) or in VdB (a decibel unit referenced to 1 microinch per second). Commonly, ground-borne vibration generated by man-made activities (i.e., road traffic, construction) attenuates rapidly with distance from the source of the vibration.

The vibration velocity level threshold of perception for humans is approximately 65 VdB. A vibration velocity of 75 VdB is the approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels for many people. Most perceptible indoor v ibration is caused by sources within buildings such as the operation of mechanical equipment, the movement of people, or the slamming of doors. Typical outdoor sources of perceptible ground-borne vibration are construction equipment, steel-wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. If a roadway is smooth, the ground -borne vibration from traffic is barely perceptible. The range of interest is from approximately 50 VdB, which is the typical background vibration velocity, to 100 VdB, which is the general threshold where minor damage can occur in fragile buildings.

2 USDOT FHWA, Fundamentals and Abatement, 97.
3 USDOT FHWA, Fundamentals and Abatement, 97.

Alameda Street Compton Project 5 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022

REGULATORY SETTING
City of Compton General Plan Noise Element
The City’s 1991 General Plan Noise Element includes a series of goals and polices to achieve and maintain noise levels compatible with various types of land uses. Goals and policies relevant to the proposed Project include:4
Goal 2: Incorporate noise considerations into land use planning decisions.

Policy 2.1: Establish acceptable limits of noise for various land uses throughout the community, in accordance with Table 2 (see below).

Policy 2.4: Require noise reduction techniques in site and architectural design and construction where noise reduction is necessary.

Goal 3: Minimize noise spillover from commercial and industrial uses into nearby residential neighborhoods.

Policy 3.1: Enforce the State standard of 65 dbA for exterior noise levels for all commercial uses.

Goal 5: Develop measures to control non-transportation noise impacts.

Policy 5.1: Adopt an updated comprehensive City Noise Ordinance to control excessive noise from lawn blowers, trimmers, machinery, or other disturbances.

Policy 5.2: Reduce noise generated by construction activities by requiring sound attenuation devices on construction equipment.

Policy 5.3: Establish and maintain coordination among the agencies involved in noise abatement.

Guidelines for Noise -Compatible Land Uses
The City’s General Plan Noise Element establishes noise criteria for the various land uses throughout the City.5 Table 2: Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix, identifies the acceptable limit of noise exposure for various land-use categories within the City.

4 City of Compton, Compton General Plan 1991, Noise Element, December 1991. 5 City of Compton, Compton General Plan 1991, Noise Element, December 1991.

Alameda Street Compton Project 6 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022
TABLE 2

NOISE/LAND USE COMPATIBILITY MATRIX
Land Use Categories
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)
55 60 65 70 75 80
Residential – Single-Family, Duplex, Multiple-
Family

Residential – Mobile Homes

Commercial – Hotel, Motel, Other Lodging

Commercial – Commercial Retail, Bank,
Restaurant, Movie Theater

Commercial - Office Building, Research and
Development, Professional Offices, City Office
Building

Amphitheater, Concert Hall
Auditorium, Meeting hall

Children's Amusement Park, Miniature Golf
Course, Go-cart Track, Equestrian Center ,
Sports Club

Automobile, Service Station, Auto Dealership,
Manufacturing, Warehousing, Wholesale, Utilities

Hospital, Church, Library, Schools’ Classroom

Parks

Golf Course, Cemeteries, nature Centers,
Wildlife Habitat

Agriculture
Clearly Compatible: Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction without any special noise insulation requirements.

Normally Compatible: New construction or development should be undertaken only after detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements are made and needed noise insulation features in the design are determined. Conventional construction, with closed windows and fresh supply systems or air conditioning, will normally suffice.

Normally Incompatible: New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design.

Clearly incompatible: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken.

Source: City of Compton, General Plan, Noise Element (1991).

Noise exposure for industrial warehouse uses is “clearly compatible” when the CNEL at exterior commercial locations is equal to or below 70 dBA, and “normally compatible” when the CNEL exceeds

Alameda Street Compton Project 7 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022
70 dBA. Noise exposure for single and mul ti-family residential uses is “clearly compatible” when the CNEL at exterior residential locations is equal to or below 60 dBA, “normally compatible” when the CNEL is between 60 to 70 dBA, “normally incompatible” when the CNEL is between 70 to 75 dBA, and “clearly incompatible” when the CNEL exceeds 75 dBA. These guidelines apply to noise sources such as vehicular traffic, aircraft, and rail movements.

City of Compton Noise Ordinance
Section 7 -12 (Noise), of the Compton Municipal Code (CMC) establishes regulations and standards regarding the generation of noise. Section 7 -12.11 of the CMC prohibits the use or operation of any machinery, equipment, pump, fan, air condition apparatus or other similar mechanical devices from exceeding the ambient noise level at the property line of any property by more than 5 dBA. Under Section 7-12.22 of the CMC, construction activities (including operation of any tools, equipment, impact devices, derricks or h oists used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, demolition or earthwork) may only occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM on weekdays and Saturday. No construction activities are permitted outside of these hours except with express written permission from a City Building Official.

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Ambient Noise Levels
Short-term sound monitoring was conducted at five (5) locations to measure the ambient sound environment in the Project vicinity. Measurements were taken over 15-minute intervals at each location between the hours of 1:48 PM and 3:19 PM on August 10, 2021. Table 3: Ambient Noise Measurements.

TABLE 3

AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS
Location Number/Description
Nearest
Use Time Period Noise Source
dBA
Leq
1 West boundary of the
Project site along N.

Alameda Street
Project site 1:48 PM–1:03 PM Vehicle traffic along N. Alameda Street

66.9 2 North boundary of the
Project site along E. Weber
Avenue
Project site 2:05 PM–2:20 PM Vehicle traffic along E. Weber Avenue and N. Alameda Street

69.0 3 West of the Project site
along E. 125th Street
Residential 2:25 PM–2:40 PM Vehicle traffic along N. Alameda Street

63.2 4 South of the Project site
along El Segundo Boulevard
School 2:45 PM–3:00 PM Vehicle traffic along El Segundo Boulevard

70.1 5 East of the Project site
along N. Santa Fe Avenue
Residential 3:04 PM–3:19 PM Vehicle traffic along N. Santa Fe Avenue

68.6 Source: Refer to Attachment A for noise monitoring data sheets.

Notes: dBA = A-weighted decibels; Leq = average equivalent sound level.

As shown in Table 3 , ambient noise levels ranged from a low of 63.2 dBA Leq west of the Project site along E. 125th Street (Site 3) to a high of 70.1 dBA Leq south of the Project site along El Segundo Boulevard (Site 4).

Alameda Street Compton Project 8 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022
Sensitive Uses
The Project site is predominantly surrounded by light industrial uses. As mentioned prev iously, East Weber Avenue is adjacent to the property on the north side, North Alameda Street and the Alameda Train Corridor is to the west, a metal recycling yard is to the south, and an unknown industrial use is to the east. Surrounding uses to the Project site include a metal recycling yard to the south, an industrial use to the east, the Alameda Train Corridor to the west, and a recycling center to the north. Residential uses are located to the west of the Project site along E. 124th Street and E. 125th Street, and to the east along N. Santa Fe Avenue. Additionally, Willard Elementary School is located to the south along El Segundo Boulevard. An overview of the surrounding land uses relative to the noise monitoring locations provided in Table 3 above is provided:
• Site 1: Located at the western boundary of the Project site along N. Alameda Street. There are no sensitive receptors within the vicinity of this noise monitoring location. • Site 2: Located at the northern boundary of the Project site along E. We ber Avenue. There are no sensitive receptors within the vicinity of this noise monitoring location. • Site 3: Located west of the Project site along E. 125th Street. Sensitive receptors include residential uses along E. 125th Street.
• Site 4: Located south of the Project site along El Segundo Boulevard. Sensitive receptors include Willard Elementary School at the corner of El Segundo Boulevard and N. Alameda Street. • Site 5 : Located east of the Project site along N. Santa Fe Avenue. Sensitive receptors inclu de residential uses along N. Santa Fe Avenue.

Vibration Conditions
Based on field observations, the primary source of existing ground-borne vibration in the vicinity of the Project site is vehicle traffic on local roadways. According to the Federal Transit Administration,6 typical road traffic–induced vibration levels are unlikely to be perceptible by people. Trucks and buses typically generate ground-borne vibration velocity levels of approximately 63 VdB (at a 50 -foot distance), and these levels could reach 72 VdB when trucks and buses pass over bumps in the road. A vibration level of 72 VdB is above the 60 VdB level of perceptibility.

METHODOLOGY
Ambient Noise Measurements
Noise-level monitoring was conducted by Meridian Consultants in August, 2021, at five locations within the Project area vicinity. Noise-level monitoring was conducted for 15-minute intervals at each location

6 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, FTA report no. 0123 (September 2018), https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact- assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf, accessed August 2021.

Alameda Street Compton Project 9 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022
using a Larson Davis Model 831 sound-level meter. This meter satisfies the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard for general environmental noise measurement instrumentation. The ANSI specifies several types of sound-level meters according to their precision. Types 1, 2, and 3 are referred to as “precision,” “general-purpose,” and “survey” meters, respectively. Most measurements carefully taken with a Type 1 sound-level meter will have a margin of error not exceeding 1 dB.

The Larson Davis Model 831 is a Type 1 precision sound -level meter. This meter meets all requirements of ANSI S1.4 -1983 and ANSI1.43- 1997 Type 1 standards, as well as International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) IEC61672 -1 Ed. 1.0, IEC60651 Ed 1.2, and IEC60804 Type 1, Group X standards. The sound-level meter was located approximately 5 feet above ground and was covered with a Larson Davis windscreen. The sound-level meter was field calibrated with an external calibrator prior to operation.

Construction Scenario
Future dates represent approximations based on the general Project timeline and are subject to change pending unpredictable circumstances that may arise. As such, for purposes of this analysis, p roject construction is assumed to begin in January 202 3 and is expected to last until December 202 3.

Construction would occur over f ive phases: (1) demolition; (2) gra ding; (3) building construction; ( 4) paving; and (5) architectural coating.

Each phase of construction would result in varying levels of intensity and a number of construction personnel. The construction workforce would consist of approximately 13 worker t rips per day and 153 total hauling trips during demolition; 10 worker trips per day during grading; 55 worker trips per day and 21 vendor trip per day during building construction; 15 worker trip per day during paving; and 11 worker trips per day during architectural coating.

Ground -Borne Vibration
Ground-borne vibration impacts were evaluated by identifying potential vibration sources, estimating the distance between vibration sources and surrounding structure locations and surrounding structure locations and vibration sensitive receptors, and making a significance determination based on the significance thresholds.

The majority of the Project’s operational -related vibration sources, such as mechanical and electrical equipment, would incorporate vibration attenuation mounts, as required by the particular equipment specifications. Therefore, operation of the Project would not increase the existing vibration levels in the immediate vicinity of the Project and, as such, vibration impacts associated with the P roject would be minimal. Therefore, the ground borne vibration analysis is limited to Project -related construction activities.

Alameda Street Compton Project 10 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, a project would have a potentially significant impact related to noise and groundborne vibration if it would result in:
• Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
• Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines also includes:
• For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise? The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not located within two miles of public airport or public use airport or within the vicinity of a private airstrips. As such, the Project would result in no impacts to this screening criteria and no further analyses of this topic is necessary.

Construction Noise
As discussed previously, Section 7 -12.11 of the CMC prohibits the use or operation of any machinery, equipment, pump, fan, air condition apparatus or other similar mechanical devices from exceeding the ambient noise level at the property line of any property by more than 5 dBA. As such, the proposed Project would result in a significant impact if construction noise levels exceed the ambient noise levels at nearby sensitive receptors by more than 5 dBA. Ambient noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors are identified in Table 3 above.

Operation al Noise
Operational noise impacts are evaluated for Project -related off-site roadway traffic noise impacts and on-site stationary source noise from on-site activities and equipment. • The Project would cause any ambient noise levels to increase by 5 dBA CNEL or more and the resulting noise falls on a noise-sensitive land use within an area categorized as either “clearly incompatible” or “normally incompatible” (see Table 2 for description of these categories); or cause ambient noise levels to increase by 3 dBA CNEL or more and the resulting noise falls on a noise -sensitive land use within an area categorized as either “clearly incompatible” or “normally incompatible.” • Project-related operational (i.e., nonroadway) noise sources such as outdoor activities, building mechanical/electrical equipment, etc., increase ambient noise level by 5 dBA, causing a violation of the City Noise Ordinance.

Alameda Street Compton Project 11 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022
Ground -Borne Vibration
The City has not adopted a significance threshold to assess vibration impacts during construction. Thus, the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual7 is used as a screening tool to assess the potential for adverse vibration effects related to structural damage. Impacts related to vibration would be considered significant if it exceeds the following standards:
• Project construction activities cause ground-borne vibration levels to exceed 0.5 PPV at the nearest off-site reinforced-concrete, steel, or timber building. • Project construction activities cause ground-borne vibration levels to exceed 0.3 PPV at the nearest off-site engineered concrete and masonry building.
• Project construction activities cause ground-borne vibration levels to exceed 0.2 PPV at the nearest off-site nonengineered timber and masonry building.
• Project construction activities cause ground -borne vibration levels to exceed 0.12 PPV at buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage, such as historic buildings. • Short-term Project generated construction vibration levels exceed the FTA maximum acceptable vibration standard of 72 VdB at sensitive receiver locations.

NOISE ANALYSIS
Construction
Noise from Project construction activities would be affected by the amount of construction equipment, the location of this equipment, the timing and duration of construction activities, and the relative distance to noise -sensitive receptors. Construction activities that woul d occur during the construction phases would generate both steady -state and episodic noise that would be heard both on and off the Project Site. Each phase involves the use of different types of construction equipment and, t herefore, has its own distinct noise characteristics. The Project would be constructed using typical construction techniques; no blasting or impact pile driving would be required.

On- Site Construction Noise
Individual pieces of construction equipment that would be used during construction produce maximum noise levels of 73 dBA to 90 dBA at a reference distance of 50 feet from the noise source, as shown in Table 4: Typical Maximum Noise Levels for Project Construction Equipment.

7 Caltrans, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (September 2013), https://cityofdavis.org/home/showdocument?id=4521, accessed August 2021.

Alameda Street Compton Project 12 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022
TABLE 4

TYPICAL MAXIMUM NOISE LEVELS FOR PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Equipment Description
Typical Duty Cycle
(%)
Spec Lmax
(dBA)
Actual Lmax
(dBA)
Air Compressor 40 80.0 77.7
Backhoe 40 80.0 77.6
Concrete/Industrial
saw
20 90.0 89.6
Crane 16 85.0 80.6
Dozer 40 85.0 81.7
Forklift 40 85.0 N/A
Front End Loader 40 80.0 79.1
Generator 50 82.0 80.6
Grader 40 85.0 N/A
Paver 50 85.0 77.2
Roller 20 85.0 80.0
Tractor 40 84.0 N/A
Welder 40 73.0 74.0
Source: FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) version 1.1 Note: N/A = not available.

These construction equipment reference noise levels are based on measured noise data compiled by the FHWA and would occur when equipment is operating under full power conditions. However , equipment used on construction sites typically operate at less than full power. The acoustical usage factor is the percentage of time that each type of construction equipment is anticipated to be in full power operation during a typical construction day. These values are estimates and will vary based on the actual construction process and schedule.

Construction equipment operates at its noisiest levels for certain percentages of time during operation.

It is important to note, equipment would operate at different percentages over the course of an hour. 8 During a constructi on day, the highest noise levels would be generated when multiple pieces of construction equipment are operated concurrently.

To characterize construction-period noise levels, the average (hourly Leq) noise level associated with each construction stage was calculated based on the quantity, type, and usage factors for each type of equipment that would be used during each construction stage. These noise levels are typically associated with multiple pieces of equipment operating simultaneously.

8 Federal Highway Administration, Traffic Noise Model (2006).

Alameda Street Compton Project 13 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022
The estimated construction noise levels were calculated for a scenario in which a reasonable number of construction equipment was assumed to be operating simultaneously, given the physical size of the Project Site and logistical limitations, and with the noise equipment located at the construction area nearest to the affected receptors to present a conservative impact analysis. This is considered a worst - case evaluation because construction of the Project would typically use fewer pieces of equipment simultaneously at any given time and, as such, would likely generate lower noise levels than reported herein.

Separate forecasts of construction noise levels from on-site construction at each of the noise monitoring sites within the immediate vicinity were completed. The forec ast noise levels at the nearest sensitive uses to the Project Site from construction activity are shown in Table 5: Construction Maximum Noise Estimates. As discussed previously , there are no sensitive receptors within the vicinity of noise monitoring locations Site 1 and Site 2. Therefore, these sites were not included in the analysis below.

As shown, average noise levels during construction would result in a maximum increase of 1.7 dBA above the significance threshold without implementation of noise reduction measures.

TABLE 5

CONSTRUCTION MAXIMUM NOISE ESTIMATES
Noise
Monitoring
Site
Nearest
Off-Site
Building
Structures
Distance
from
Project
Site
(feet)
Max
Leq
Ambient
Noise Leq
(dBA)
Significance
Threshold
(dBA)
Maximum Noise Increase
over Significance
Threshold without Noise
Reduction Measures
(dBA)
Site 3
Residential uses
along E. 125th
Street
320 69.9 63.2 68.2 +1.7
Site 4
School use along
El Segundo
Boulevard
1,030 59.7 70.1 75.1 0.0
Site 5
Residential uses
along N. Santa
Fe Avenue
1,360 57.3 68.6 73.6 0.0
Source: FHWA, RCNM, version. 1.1.

Refer to Attachment B for Construction Noise Worksheets The proposed Project would implement common construction best management practices (BMP’s) such as the use of optimal muffler systems for all equipment which would reduce construction noise levels by approximately 10 dB or more. Additionally, limiting the number of noise -generating heavy -duty construction equipment to two (2) pieces operating simultaneously would reduce construction noise levels by approximately 5 dB. With implementation of these common practices, construction noise levels would be reduced by a minimum of 15 dB.

Alameda Street Compton Project 14 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022
Moreover, the Project would comply with Section 7-12.22 of the CMC by ensuring that the operation of sound-amplifying equipment would only occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM on weekdays and Saturday. Compliance with the above practices would ensure construction noise levels would be below the significance threshold; thus, construction noise levels would not be considered significant.

Off-Site Construction Noise
Construction of the Project would require worker, haul, and vendor truck trips to and from the site to work on the site, export demolition debris, and deliver supplies to the site. Trucks traveling to and from the Project site would be required to travel along a haul route approved by the City. At the maximum approximately 153 total hauling trips would take place during the demolition phase, totaling to approximately 15 haul truck trips per work day. Haul truck traffic would take the most direct route to the freeway ramp, which includes the freeway ramp.

Noise associated with construction trips were estimated using the Caltrans FHWA Traffic Noise Mod el based on the maximum number of worker and hauling trips in a day. Project haul truck trips which includes medium- and heavy-duty trucks would generate noise levels of approximately 43.6 dBA and 50.6 dBA, respectively, measured at the nearest sensitive receptors along the haul route. As shown in Table 3, existing noise levels at the Project site ranged from 63.2 dBA to 70.1 dBA. The noise level increases from truck trips would be below the significance threshold of 5 dBA. As such, off-site construction noise impacts would not be considered significant.

Construction Vibration
Table 6: On-Site Construction Vibration Impacts–Building Damage and Table 7: On-Site Construction Vibration Impacts–Human Annoyance presents the construction vibration impacts associated with on - site construction in terms of building damage and human annoyance, respectively. It is important to note pile driving would not be required during construction. As shown in Table 6, the forecasted vibration levels due to on-site construction activities would not exceed the building damage significance threshold at the nearby sensitive receptors for vibratory rollers, large bulldozers, caisson drilling , loaded trucks, jackhammers, and small bulldozers . Due to the distance of the Project- identified sensitive receptors, changes in elevations, and intervening structures, such as buildings and walls, on -site construction vibration would not result in a significant vibration impact with regard to building dam age. Impacts related to building damage from on-site construction vibration would not be considered significant.

As shown in Table 7, the forecasted vibration levels due to on -site construction activities would not exceed the human annoyance threshold for infrequent events of 72 VdB for the nearby sensitive receptors surrounding the Project area during construction. Due to the distance of the Project-identified sensitive receptors and intervening structures, such as buildings and walls, on- site construction vibration would not result in a significant vibration impact with regard to human annoyance. Impacts related to human annoyance from on-site construction vibration would not be considered significant.

Alameda Street Compton Project 15 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022
TABLE 6
ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION IMPACTS—BUILDING DAMAGE
Site
Nearest Off-Site
Building Structures
Estimated Vibration Velocity Levels at the Nearest Off-Site Structures from the Project Construction Equipment Significance Threshold
(PPV ips)
Vibratory
Roller
Large
Bulldozer
Caisson
Drilling
Loaded
Trucks Jackhammer
Small
bulldozer
FTA Reference Vibration Levels at 25 feet

0.210 0.089 0.089 0.076 0.035 0.003
3 Residential uses
along E. 125th
Street
(320 Feet)

0.005 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.2
4 School use along El
Segundo Boulevard
(1,030 Feet)

0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2
5 Residential uses
along N. Santa Fe
Avenue
(1,360 Feet)

0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2
Source: US Department of Transportation, Federal Transportation Authority, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Note: Refer to Attachment C for construction vibration worksheets.

TABLE 7
ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION IMPACTS – HUMAN ANNOYANCE Site
Nearest Off-Site
Building Structures
Estimated Vibration Velocity Levels at the Nearest Off-Site Structures from the Project Construction Equipment Significance Threshold
(VdB)
Vibratory
Roller
Large
Bulldozer
Caisson
Drilling
Loaded
Trucks Jackhammer
Small
bulldozer
3 Residential uses
along E. 125th
Street
(320 Feet)
61 54 54 52 46 24 72
4 School use along El
Segundo Boulevard
(1,030 Feet)
46 38 38 37 30 9 72
5 Residential uses
along N. Santa Fe
Avenue
(1,360 Feet)
42 35 35 34 27 5 72
Source: US Department of Transportation, Federal Transportation Authority, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Note: Refer to Attachment C for construction vibration worksheets.

Operation
Fixed Mechanical Equipment Noise
The Project would introduce various stationary noise sources, including heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, which would be located either on the roof, the side of a structure , or on the

Alameda Street Compton Project 16 Noise Study
Public Storage January 2022
ground. All Project mechanical equipment would be required to be designed with appropriate noise- control devices—such as sound attenuators, acoustics louvers, or sound screens/parapet walls—to comply with noise-limitation requirements provided in Section 7 -12.11 of the CMC , which prohibits equipment from causing more than a 5 db increase in the ambient noise level. Therefore, operation of mechanical equipment on the Project building would not exceed the City’s threshold of significance.

CUMULATIVE NOISE
For purposes of this analysis, development of the related projects will be considered to contribute to cumulative noise impacts. Noise , by definition, is a localized phenomenon and drastically reduces as distance from the source increases. As a result, only related projects and growth in the general area of the Project site (within 500 feet) would contribute to cumulative noise impacts. Cumulative construction- noise impacts have the potential to occur when multiple construction projects in the local area generate noise within the same time frame and contribute to the local ambient noise environment. It is expected that, as with the Project, the related projects would implement noise reduction techniques such as mufflers, shields, sound barriers, which would minimize any noise-related nuisances during construction.

In addition, distance attenuation and intervening structures would further reduce construction noise levels and not result in noticeable increases. Therefore, the combined construction -noise impacts of related projects within 500 feet and the Project’s contribution would not cause a significant cumulative impact.

With regard to stationary sources, cumulative significant noise impacts may result from cumulative development. Stationary sources of noise that could be introduced in the area by cumulativ e projects could include mechanical equipment, loading docks, and parking lots. Given that these projects would be required to adhere to the City ’s noise standards, all stationary sources would be required to have shielding or other noise-abatement measures so as not to cause a substantial increase in ambient noise levels. Moreover, due to distance, it is unlikely that noise from multiple cumulative projects would interact to create a significant combined noise impact. As such, it is not anticipated that a significant cumulative increase in permanent ambient noise levels would occur.

Attachment A
Noise Monitoring Data Sheets
Monitoring Location: Site 1
Monitoring Date: 08/10/2021
Monitoring Period
Time LAeq LASmax LASmin
13:48:12 61.3 69.6 54.5
13:49:12 66.4 75.8 56.9
13:50:12 59.0 62.6 55.5
13:51:12 59.5 63.8 53.8
13:52:12 68.0 78.3 58.7
13:53:12 74.5 86.8 54.9
13:54:12 61.7 69.7 55.8
13:55:12 70.5 79.2 56.7
13:56:12 62.8 75.8 54.7
13:57:12 65.8 76.8 55.8
13:58:12 61.2 71.2 55.3
13:59:12 65.1 76.1 53.9
14:00:12 58.0 61.3 53.9
14:01:12 68.1 80.0 55.2
14:02:12 66.2 77.6 58.4
14:03:12 62.1 61.8 61.4
15-minute LAeq 66.9
Monitoring Location: Site 2
Monitoring Date: 08/10/2021
Monitoring Period
Time LAeq LASmax LASmin
14:05:58 67.3 78.0 53.7
14:06:58 67.4 78.7 55.6
14:07:58 75.3 85.1 54.6
14:08:58 65.0 84.2 53.8
14:09:58 67.4 78.2 54.7
14:10:58 68.4 76.9 57.7
14:11:58 67.8 77.0 58.2
14:12:58 65.6 78.9 52.6
14:13:58 65.7 76.8 52.5
14:14:58 67.1 79.0 49.6
14:15:58 74.3 84.0 57.5
14:16:58 72.3 83.0 55.2
14:17:58 61.2 71.2 51.7
14:18:58 61.9 72.7 53.0
14:19:58 60.8 73.0 51.7
14:20:58 54.7 57.2 55.3
15-minute LAeq 69.0
Monitoring Location: Site 3
Monitoring Date: 08/10/2021
Monitoring Period
Time LAeq LASmax LASmin
14:25:52 62.1 66.4 56.0
14:26:52 61.5 66.8 56.6
14:27:52 60.4 65.5 56.4
14:28:52 61.2 66.0 56.9
14:29:52 66.7 78.0 58.4
14:30:52 65.5 78.8 57.2
14:31:52 65.5 76.3 57.1
14:32:52 64.0 73.5 56.5
14:33:52 61.4 67.7 56.5
14:34:52 67.6 80.8 56.2
14:35:52 60.6 63.8 56.8
14:36:52 58.8 63.8 55.4
14:37:52 61.2 66.2 55.9
14:38:52 61.2 68.3 55.7
14:39:52 61.8 66.0 57.0
14:40:52 56.4 57.4 57.1
15-minute LAeq 63.2
Monitoring Location: Site 4
Monitoring Date: 08/10/2021
Monitoring Period
Time LAeq LASmax LASmin
14:45:21 65.7 76.1 56.1
14:46:21 68.0 75.0 58.0
14:47:21 71.7 79.2 58.1
14:48:21 72.4 79.7 60.2
14:49:21 70.3 76.1 58.0
14:50:21 72.2 78.0 58.6
14:51:21 67.8 72.8 58.5
14:52:21 71.4 76.5 63.1
14:53:21 69.9 77.8 52.8
14:54:21 64.6 76.0 54.4
14:55:21 65.7 72.7 55.0
14:56:21 69.6 78.6 54.3
14:57:21 72.4 81.3 57.9
14:58:21 71.5 79.5 56.7
14:59:21 71.8 79.5 57.4
15:00:21 64.8 65.4 65.1
15-minute LAeq 70.1
Monitoring Location: Site 5
Monitoring Date: 08/10/2021
Monitoring Period
Time LAeq LASmax LASmin
15:04:57 68.2 77.3 53.1
15:05:57 69.4 78.6 52.8
15:06:57 69.1 74.3 57.9
15:07:57 69.6 77.6 53.2
15:08:57 67.9 75.3 51.4
15:09:57 68.1 73.0 52.4
15:10:57 66.8 72.5 58.5
15:11:57 67.1 76.4 50.2
15:12:57 65.5 74.3 48.0
15:13:57 64.4 72.4 49.5
15:14:57 68.9 74.6 49.5
15:15:57 69.4 76.5 58.5
15:16:57 68.6 75.4 55.4
15:17:57 69.3 76.5 53.7
15:18:57 68.3 74.6 58.5
15:19:57 72.2 71.0 69.1
15-minute LAeq 68.6
Attachment B
Construction Noise Worksheet
Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date:8/11/2021
Case Description:Demolition
---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 3 Residential 63.2 63.2 63.2
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 320 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 320 0
Tractor No 40 84 320 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 320 0
Front End Loader No 40 79.1 320 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Concrete Saw 73.5 66.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 65.5 61.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 67.9 63.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.4 57.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63 59 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 73.5 69.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 4 Commercial 70.1 70.1 70.1
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 1030 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 1030 0
Tractor No 40 84 1030 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 1030 0
Front End Loader No 40 79.1 1030 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Concrete Saw 63.3 56.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 55.4 51.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 57.7 53.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 51.3 47.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 52.8 48.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 63.3 59.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 5 Residential 68.6 68.6 68.6
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 1360 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 1360 0
Tractor No 40 84 1360 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 1360 0
Front End Loader No 40 79.1 1360 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Concrete Saw 60.9 53.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 53 49 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 55.3 51.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 48.9 44.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 50.4 46.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 60.9 57.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date:8/11/2021
Case Description:Grading
---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 3 Residential 63.2 63.2 63.2
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Grader No 40 85 320 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 320 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 320 0
Tractor No 40 84 320 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Grader 68.9 64.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 65.5 61.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.4 57.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 67.9 63.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 68.9 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 4 Commercial 70.1 70.1 70.1
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Grader No 40 85 1030 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 1030 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 1030 0
Tractor No 40 84 1030 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Grader 58.7 54.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 55.4 51.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 51.3 47.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 57.7 53.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 58.7 58.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 5 Residential 68.6 68.6 68.6
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Grader No 40 85 1360 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 1360 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 1360 0
Tractor No 40 84 1360 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Grader 56.3 52.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 53 49 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 48.9 44.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 55.3 51.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 56.3 56.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date:8/11/2021
Case Description:Building Construction
---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 3 Residential 63.2 63.2 63.2
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 320 0
Forklift No 40 85 320 0
Forklift No 40 85 320 0
Generator No 50 80.6 320 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 320 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 320 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 320 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 320 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Crane 64.4 56.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Forklift 68.9 64.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Forklift 68.9 64.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 64.5 61.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.4 57.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 57.9 53.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 57.9 53.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 57.9 53.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 68.9 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 4 Commercial 70.1 70.1 70.1
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 1030 0
Forklift No 40 85 1030 0
Forklift No 40 85 1030 0
Generator No 50 80.6 1030 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 1030 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 1030 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 1030 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 1030 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Crane 54.3 46.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Forklift 58.7 54.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Forklift 58.7 54.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 54.4 51.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 51.3 47.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 47.7 43.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 47.7 43.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 47.7 43.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 58.7 59.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 5 Residential 68.6 68.6 68.6
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 1360 0
Forklift No 40 85 1360 0
Forklift No 40 85 1360 0
Generator No 50 80.6 1360 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 1360 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 1360 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 1360 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 1360 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Crane 51.9 43.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Forklift 56.3 52.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Forklift 56.3 52.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 51.9 48.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 48.9 44.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 45.3 41.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 45.3 41.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 45.3 41.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 56.3 57.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date:8/11/2021
Case Description:Paving
---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 3 Residential 63.2 63.2 63.2
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Paver No 50 77.2 320 0
Paver No 50 77.2 320 0
Roller No 20 80 320 0
Roller No 20 80 320 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 320 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Paver 61.1 58.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 61.1 58.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 63.9 56.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 63.9 56.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.4 57.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 63.9 64.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 4 Commercial 70.1 70.1 70.1
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Paver No 50 77.2 1030 0
Paver No 50 77.2 1030 0
Roller No 20 80 1030 0
Roller No 20 80 1030 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 1030 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Paver 50.9 47.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 50.9 47.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 53.7 46.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 53.7 46.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 51.3 47.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 53.7 54.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 5 Residential 68.6 68.6 68.6
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Paver No 50 77.2 1360 0
Paver No 50 77.2 1360 0
Roller No 20 80 1360 0
Roller No 20 80 1360 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 1360 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Paver 48.5 45.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 48.5 45.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 51.3 44.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 51.3 44.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 48.9 44.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 51.3 51.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date:8/11/2021
Case Description:Architectural Coating
---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 3 Residential 63.2 63.2 63.2
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 320 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Compressor (air) 61.5 57.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 61.5 57.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 4 Commercial 70.1 70.1 70.1
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 1030 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Compressor (air) 51.4 47.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 51.4 47.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Site 5 Residential 68.6 68.6 68.6
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 1360 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Compressor (air) 49 45 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 49 45 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Attachment C
Construction Vibration Worksheet
Meridian Consultants LLC Alameda Street Compton Project Construction Vibration Model
(320 feet)
Rev: 11-12-2012
Equipment Pieces of
Equipment
PPV at 25 feet
(in/sec)
Distance from
Equipment
PPV at
adjusted
distance
RMS velocity
amplitude in
in/sec at
adjusted
distancea
RMS
Vibration
level in
VdB at
adjusted
distance
Caisson drilling 1 0.089 320 0.002 0.000 54
Jackhammer 1 0.035 320 0.001 0.000 46
Large bulldozer 1 0.089 320 0.002 0.000 54
Loaded trucks 1 0.076 320 0.002 0.000 52
Pile Drive (impact) 1 0.644 320 0.014 0.004 71
Vibratory Roller 1 0.210 320 0.005 0.001 61
Small bulldozer 1 0.003 320 0.000 0.000 24
* Suggested Vibration Thresholds per the Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA-VA-90-1003-06), May 2006, pg. 12-12.
-Fragile Buildings- 0.20 in/sec
Meridian Consultants LLC Alameda Street Compton Project Construction Vibration Model
(1,030 feet)
Rev: 11/12/2012
Equipment Pieces of
Equipment
PPV at 25 feet
(in/sec)
Distance from
Equipment
PPV at
adjusted
distance
RMS velocity
amplitude in
in/sec at
adjusted
distancea
RMS
Vibration
level in
VdB at
adjusted
distance
Caisson drilling 1 0.089 1030 0.000 0.000 38
Jackhammer 1 0.035 1030 0.000 0.000 30
Large bulldozer 1 0.089 1030 0.000 0.000 38
Loaded trucks 1 0.076 1030 0.000 0.000 37
Pile Drive (impact) 1 0.644 1030 0.002 0.001 56
Vibratory Roller 1 0.210 1030 0.001 0.000 46
Small bulldozer 1 0.003 1030 0.000 0.000 9
* Suggested Vibration Thresholds per the Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA-VA-90-1003-06), May 2006, pg. 12-12.
-Fragile Buildings- 0.20 in/sec
Meridian Consultants LLC Alameda Street Compton Project Construction Vibration Model
(1,360 feet)
Rev: 11-12-2012
Equipment Pieces of
Equipment
PPV at 25 feet
(in/sec)
Distance from
Equipment
PPV at
adjusted
distance
RMS velocity
amplitude in
in/sec at
adjusted
distancea
RMS
Vibration
level in
VdB at
adjusted
distance
Caisson drilling 1 0.089 1360 0.000 0.000 35
Jackhammer 1 0.035 1360 0.000 0.000 27
Large bulldozer 1 0.089 1360 0.000 0.000 35
Loaded trucks 1 0.076 1360 0.000 0.000 34
Pile Drive (impact) 1 0.644 1360 0.002 0.000 52
Vibratory Roller 1 0.210 1360 0.001 0.000 42
Small bulldozer 1 0.003 1360 0.000 0.000 5
* Suggested Vibration Thresholds per the Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA-VA-90-1003-06), May 2006, pg. 12-12.
-Fragile Buildings- 0.20 in/sec
JULY 12, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND NOT ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 950 AND MITIGATION

MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) AND DENY
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE (CUP) NO. 21-011, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE (CUP) NO. 21-012 RELATING TO A REQUEST TO DEVELOP AND OPERATE A 131,028 SQUARE-FOOT, THREE-STORY, PERSONAL SELF-STORAGE FACILITY PROPOSED AT 3010 NORTH

ALAMEDA STREET, COMPTON, IN THE HEAVY MANUFACTURING (M-H) ZONE

SUMMARY
City Council will consider an appeal of Planning Commission’s decision to not adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 950 & Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and denial of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Case No. 21-011 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Case No. 21-012, a request of Public Storage to develop and operate a 131,028 square-foot, three-story, personal self-storage facility proposed at 3010 N. Alameda St., Compton, in the Heavy Manufacturing (M-H) zone. The Zoning Code requires that new buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet and self-storage facilities obtain a conditional use permit (CUP) in accordance with Section 30-26 of the Compton Municipal Code (CMC).

BACKGROUND
On April 13, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the above-listed requests.

After due consideration, the Planning Commission did not adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 950 & Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and denied Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Case No. 21-011 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Case No. 21-012 by the following vote: two ‘yes’ votes and two abstained. As a result, Public Storage (the applicant) has appealed that decision to City Council. Planning Commission appeals must be considered at a public hearing in accordance with Section 30-26 of the Compton Municipal Code.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project would redevelop a 2.11 acre (92,143 sq. ft.) site comprised of two parcels (6169-021- 032 AND 6169-021-038) which is located southeast corner of E. Weber Ave. and N. Alameda Street. The project site has approximately 300 linear feet of street frontage along N. Alameda Street and 307 linear feet of street frontage along E. Weber Avenue. The subject site is currently developed with a variety of industrial and auto related uses with a total existing building area of 33,602 SF among seven older industrial buildings, which would be demolished to accommodate the proposed project.

6.6. Staff Report – City Council Appeal of CUP Case No. 21-011 and CUP Case No. 21-012 and MND No. 950
July 12, 2022

Page 2 of 3 ends

The proposed personal self-storage facility is comprised of a 3-story, 131,028 square-foot building which includes a 940 square-foot rental office with 27 on-site parking spaces. Access to the subject site will be from one driveway on E. Weber Avenue and one driveway on N.

Alameda St. The remaining existing driveways on both streets will be removed. Parking will be provided on both the east and south sides of the proposed building for customers accessing the rental office and two loading lobbies. A security gate at each driveway will remain open during all customer access hours and closed and locked during closed hours.

The rental office will be open from 9am to 6pm seven days a week. Customers will visit the rental office to inquire about rental space, pay rent, or purchase packing supplies such as boxes or tape. One to two employees per shift will staff the facility. Based on market conditions, the office and facility hours may be revised after opening. Customers will access the new building and their storage spaces through secured lobbies, using an access code. The site, lobbies, and storage spaces will be accessible to customers from 6am to 9pm seven days a week. The proposed building will be climate-controlled, and all storage units will be accessible only from the inside of the building. Security cameras will be located inside and outside the building. The Security cameras will allow on site review from the property manager and staff, along with remote viewing capabilities for the security company that provides after hours detection and monitoring capability.

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The following entitlements are required to facilitate this project:
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 21-011 – a request to develop a building in excess of 50,000 square feet in size;
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 21-012 – a request to develop and operate a personal self-storage facility; and
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 950 – Adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process gives the City an opportunity to thoroughly evaluate the each CUP request and determine if the proposed land use is compatible with the surrounding vicinity and manage/control potential negative impacts by the imposing conditions of approval on the project.

This project was routed to the various City Departments, responsible utility providers/public agencies for review and comment and no objections were received. The proposed project as designed, substantially complies with zoning development standards. The proposed personal self- storage facility, is an allowed use in the M-H zone, subject to approval of a conditional use permit and would be compatible with the existing surrounding commercial, light and heavy industrial land uses. The proposed project would visually/aesthetically enhance the subject site and the surrounding area and has the potential serve as a catalyst to revitalize this older industrial area of Compton.

Staff Report – City Council Appeal of CUP Case No. 21-011 and CUP Case No. 21-012 and MND No. 950
July 12, 2022

Page 3 of 3 ends

FINANCIAL IMPACT
None.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this appeal. Pursuant to Section 30-26.5(k) of the Compton Municipal Code, the City Council shall render its decision on the appeal within thirty (30) days after conclusion of the appeal hearing and has the power to:
Affirm the decision of the Planning Commission; or
Amend the decision of the Planning Commission; or
Overturn the decision of the Planning Commission; or
If in the opinion of the Council, the matter requires further consideration, refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for further consideration (without a decision by the Council) with any recommendations the Council may desire.

ROBERT DELGADILLO, SENIOR PLANNER

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR FORWARDING:

THOMAS THOMAS

CITY MANAGER
RESOLUTION NO. _____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND NOT ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 950 AND MITIGATION

ALAMEDA STREET, COMPTON, IN THE HEAVY MANUFACTURING (M-H) ZONE
WHEREAS, Public Storage filed two conditional use permit applications in accordance with the Section 30-26 of the Compton Municipal Code for the use of certain real property situated in the City of Compton, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, and legally described as follows:

LOTS, 1, 2, 3 & 4, BLOCK 3 OF BELLE VERNON ACRES, IN THE CITY OF

COMPTON, IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 9, PAGE 196 OF

MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY TOGETHER WITH THE BELLE VERNON ACRES ½ STREET VACATION
ADJOINING SAID LOTS. (APNs: 6169-021-032 AND 6169-021-038) proposed at 3010 N. Alameda St., Compton, California; and WHEREAS, new building in excess of 50,000 square feet requires a conditional use permit (CUP) pursuant to Sections 30-15 and 30-26 of the Compton Municipal Code (CMC); and
WHEREAS, self-storage facilities requires a conditional use permit (CUP) pursuant to Sections 30-15 and 30-26 of the Compton Municipal Code (CMC); and WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared, processed and noticed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Division 13 §21000 et seq.); and WHEREAS, a public hearing upon said mitigated negative declaration, and conditional use permits was held before the Planning Commission on April 13, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due notice and public hearing as required by law, did not adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 950 and denied Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Case No. 21-011, and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Case No. 21-012, and adopted Resolution No. 4035; and
WHEREAS, an appeal was filed by the Public Storage, the project applicant; and

WHEREAS, the City Council appeal public hearing notice was published in the Compton Bulletin on May 25, 2022 and June 1, 2022, June 29, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after due notice in accordance with Section 30-26 of the Compton Municipal Code (CMC), held and concluded a public hearing for said appeal on June 7, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed oral and documentary evidence, is fully advised of the matter at hand and has been submitted for decision.

Resolution No. ______________

Page 2 ends

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1.That the findings of the Planning Commission in its Resolution No. 4035 and the action of the Planning Commission in said Resolution No. 4035 is hereby affirmed, and that the appeal relative to the application, a request to a request to develop and operate a 131,028 square-foot, three-story, personal self-storage facility proposed at 3010 N. Alameda St., Compton, in the Heavy Manufacturing (M-H) zone, is denied, subject to findings found in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4035.

Section 2.That a copy of this Resolution shall be mailed to the applicant/appellant, and provided to Community Development Department (Planning Division).

Section 3.That the Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.

ADOPTED this _______ day of _______________________, 2022. _______________________________

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF COMPTON
ATTEST:
___________________________________

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF COMPTON
I, Alita Godwin, City Clerk of the City of Compton, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Compton, signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular meeting thereof held on the _______ day of ________________, 2022.

The Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
___________________________________

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF COMPTON
July 12, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON AMENDING THE RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2022-
2023 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE A
GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $43,500, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH

HAROLD JOHNSON AS THE DREAMTEAM COORDINATOR

SUMMARY
This Resolution will amend the Recreation Department 2022-23 Fiscal Year annual budget and authorize the City Manager to enter into a letter of agreement with the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation (LADF) to accept and appropriate grant funding in the amount of Forty-Three Thousand, Five Hundred and Zero Cents ($43,500.00) to be used for park field maintenance and youth umpire fees, in addition to other in-kind contributions, for the 2022 Dodgers Dreamteam program.

BACKGROUND
On January 31, 2022, the Recreation Department (‘Department”) applied for and was awarded grant funding in the amount of $43,500, as well as other in-kind contributions, from the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation (LADF) through Dodgers Dreamteam Program. The grant funding will assist the Recreation Department in purchasing field preparation items, providing an allowance for the Dodger Dreamteam Coordinator's wages, and umpire fees to support this year's Dodgers Dreamteam Baseball League.

The Dodgers Dreamteam Program is a baseball and softball youth development program funded by the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation (LADF). The program aims to increase participation in youth baseball while bringing awareness to education, literacy, health, wellness and recreational resources in the Community. The City’s Recreation Department is preparing to serve up to six hundred (600) Compton youth ages 5 through 18 during the 2022 Spring and Summer Baseball Seasons.

As an affiliate partner and grantee, the City of Compton Recreation Department will continue to facilitate the day to day operations of the Dodger Dreamteam Baseball League and receive the following:

7.7.7. Staff Report – Accepting Grant from
The Dodgers Foundation
For City’s Youth Baseball League
July 12, 2022, Page 2
Uniforms for every player to include home and away jersey, pants, socks, hats/visors, and practice t-shirts
Equipment kits for every team to include gloves, bats, tees, catcher’s gear, baseballs, and softball
Branded polo shirts for every coach
Live workshops and skills training for all coaches
Dodgers Dreamteam Coordinator Position
Grants to offset umpire and field maintenance costs
Marketing and recruitment support to include fliers and banners LADF staff support
Access to education and health resources for youth and families, college tours, eye screenings/exams/glasses, financial literacy seminars, and fitness clinics ●Work with LADF to complete SEL surveys for program participants using Hello Insight pre- and post-surveys.
●Create a Parent Advisory Team (PAT) within your agency. This is a volunteer parent involvement group to support parent engagement.
●Promote and recruit participants for ongoing programs that LADF offers. ●Be accountable to providing data and information to LADF to support the implementation and growth of the program at City of Compton.

The Grant requires the City to hire a Dodger Dreamteam Coordinator who will assist in overseeing program logistics. Subsequently, the Grants Division conducted an RFP to select an individual to serve as the Dodgers Dreamteam Coordinator. As a result of this procurement process, the City received three really high quality proposals.
1) Mr. Harold Johnson submitted a bid that responded to all requirements and was the lowest bid at $15 per hour.
2) Mr. Don Buford was the second lowest bid proposing $50 per hour. 3) Mr. Gerald Pickens was the highest at $75 per hour.

Although, all proposals entailed great responses from very highly qualified and skilled applicants, the City selected the lowest bid received from Mr. Harold Johnson.

Mr. Harold Johnson served the City well through the Compton Little League Baseball team over the past thirty years. He was president of the league during the 90’s and Vice President from 2000 until present. He volunteered for Parks and Recreation Department as a Coach for several years through the City’s Parks and Recreation Department and coached championship teams in 2017 and 2018. He briefly worked with the Dodgers Urban Youth Academy at Compton college and has received accolades from Dodger Foundation staff members. Overall, Mr. Johnson has demonstrated his capacity through the RFP process as well as his volunteer efforts in the City.

Staff Report – Accepting Grant from
The Dodgers Foundation
For City’s Youth Baseball League
July 12, 2022, Page 3
As a contracted partner to the City of Compton, the Dreamteam Coordinator will assist in delivering a high quality program for youth to enjoy. The Dodgers Dreamteam Coordinator role is designed to work in partnership with the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation, the local community, and the City of Compton staff to effectively deliver the Dodgers Dreamteam program. The Coordinator can be paid up to $30,000 to administer the following scope of work.

Scope of Work
●Recruit players/participants for the Dodgers Dreamteam program, resulting in full rosters for the City of Compton
●Recruit and assign coaches for all of the Dodgers Dreamteam programs at our site(s).
●Set goals and establish plans to continue to grow participation in the Dodgers Dreamteam program with a specific focus on girls, teens and all minority youth. ●Manage and coordinate Field Champions to maximize participation and engagement in the community. Field Champions are assigned to you by LADF through a partnership with Up2Us Sports.
●Serve as a liaison in your community to engage kids and families in the Dodgers Dreamteam program and educate them about what the program has to offer. ●Communicate directly with parents and families to help them understand the logistics of the program operations. This includes ongoing and frequent communications with parents.
●Serve as the primary point of contact for LADF staff with City of Compton. LADF staff will work with the Dodgers Dreamteam Coordinator to provide resources to support the implementation of the program, including equipment and uniforms. ●Manage all scheduling associated with the Dodgers Dreamteam program. ●Attend games and practices and be the visible point of contact for staff, coaches, volunteers and participants in the program.
●Schedule and secure umpires for all Dodgers Dreamteam program games. ●Maintain the use of LeagueApps for City of Compton ensuring that player and coach registrations are up-to-date, and all rosters are created and regularly maintained throughout the season.

The Recreation Department will oversee the Coordinator, record hours worked, ensure the aforementioned scope of work is conducted, and determine authorized hours of work. This partnership will ensure that the City provides excellent recreation programming to the residents of Compton.

Staff Report – Accepting Grant from
The Dodgers Foundation
For City’s Youth Baseball League
July 12, 2022, Page 4

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
City Management is recommending that Council accept and appropriate these grant funds from the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation for the City of Compton’s Dreamteam Youth Baseball League. The Grants Division is also requesting that Council authorize City Management to enter into an agreement with Mr. Harold Johnson. The Coordinator can be paid up to Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000) based on hours worked according to the scope of work listed above. Additionally, Thirteen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($13,500) is set aside for items necessary to operate the program such as equipment, maintenance of fields, events, etc.

FISCAL IMPACT
The adoption of this Resolution will amend the Recreation Department’s 2022-2023 Fiscal Year annual budget to increase revenue and appropriate expenditures as follows:

RECOMMENDATION
It is Staff’s recommendation that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution.

THOMAS THOMAS

CITY MANAGER
RESOLUTION NO.____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON AMENDING THE RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2022-2023 ANNUAL BUDGET TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE A GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $43,500,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN

AGREEMENT WITH HAROLD JOHNSON AS THE DREAMTEAM

COORDINATOR
WHEREAS, on January 31, 2022, the City applied for and was awarded grant funding in the amount of $43,500, as well as other in-kind contributions, from the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation (LADF) through their Dodgers Dreamteam (Formerly Dodgers RBI) Program; and
WHEREAS, the grant funding will assist the Recreation Department in purchasing field preparation items, provide an allowance for the Dodgers Dreamteam Coordinator wages, and umpire fees in support of this year’s Dodgers Dreamteam Baseball League; and
WHEREAS, the award of this grant will allow the Department serve up to six hundred (600) Compton youth ages 5 through 18 years during the 2022 Spring and Summer Baseball Season; and
WHEREAS, the Dodgers Dreamteam Program is a baseball and softball youth development program of the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation (LADF). It aims to increase participation in youth baseball while brining awareness to education, literacy, health, wellness and recreational resources in the Community; and WHEREAS, the Department desires to accept and appropriate a Grant from the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation in the amount of $43,500 for the purpose of administering the City of Compton’s Dodgers Dreamteam Youth Baseball League.

WHEREAS, the Grant requires that the City select a Dreamteam Coordinator to assist with oversight of the program; and
WHEREAS, The Grants Division conducted a Request for Proposal process to select an individual to serve as the Dreamteam Coordinator. The City received three bids from Gerald Pickens, Don Buford, and Harold Johnson. Mr. Harold Johnson submitted a bid that responded to all requirements and was the lowest bid; and WHEREAS, the Department desires to enter into an Agreement with Mr. Harold Jonson to who was selected as the Dreamteam Coordinator to assist with program administration, coordination, and logistics associated to the Compton’s Dodgers Dreamteam Youth Baseball League; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1.That the City Council hereby accepts the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation grant in the amount of Forty-Three Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($43,500), as well as other in-kind contributions, from the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation as part of their Dreamteam program.

Section 2.That the City Manager, with the advice and approval of the City Attorney, is hereby authorized to enter into an Agreement with Mr. Harold Johnson to assist with the administration of the Dodgers Dreamteam program.

Resolution No. ______________

Page 2 ends

Section 3.That the Recreation Department’s 2022-2023 Fiscal Year annual budget is amended to increase revenue and appropriate expenditures as follows:

Increase Revenue
Account Number Description Amount
2685-840-002-3581 Private Agency Grant $43,500
Increase Expenditures
Account Number Description Amount
2685-840-002-4266 Other Contract Services $30,000
2685-840-002-4238 Special Department Expense $13,500
Section 4.That a certified copy of this Resolution shall be filed in the offices of the City Manager, City Attorney, City Controller, City Clerk and the City of Compton Recreation Department.

Section 5. That the Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.

ADOPTED this ________ day of ______________, 2022.
_______________________________

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF COMPTON
ATTEST:
___________________________________

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF COMPTON: ss
I, Alita Godwin, City Clerk of the City of Compton, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council, signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk at a regular meeting thereof held on the ______ day of ______________, 2022.

That said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
ABSTAINS: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
_____________________________________

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

CITY OF COMPTON
AND

HAROLD JOHNSON
This AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the CITY OF COMPTON, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as “CITY”) located at 205 South Willowbrook Avenue, Compton, California 90220 and HAROLD JOHNSON, (hereinafter referred to as “COORDINATOR”) (each a “Party” and collectively, the “Parties”).

RECITALS:

WHEREAS, each year the City receives funding from the Los Angeles Dodger Foundation for the Dodger Dreamteam program; and
WHEREAS, the City plans to utilize these funds to enter into an agreement with a qualified individual who is knowledgeable about baseball, has demonstrated professional program development of youth programing; and
WHEREAS, as a result of receiving funding from the Dodgers, the City desires to engage the services of an experienced and qualified coordinator to assist the City with training, oversight, preparation and approval of Baseball practice along with games held at City of Compton Parks; and
WHEREAS, Coordinator warrants that he is specifically trained, experienced, competent and has the resources to provide such necessary services which will be required by this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, City desires to engage Consultant to provide these services by reason of its qualifications and experience in performing such services; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. ________ adopted on the ___________, the City Council gave approval to award a contract to the Consultant to provide the services required; and
WHEREAS, Consultant is willing to render such professional services subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, Consultant and City, for the consideration, terms and conditions herein described, mutually agree as follows:

Scope of Services to be Rendered by Consultant.It is the mutual understanding of the Parties that the Consultant shall assist the City’s Grants Division and Recreation Department in the administration of the City’s Dodger Dreamteam program by assisting the Recreation Department with program coordination and Grants Division with ensuring program is conducted as described by the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation. As a contracted partner of the City of Compton, the Coordinator will assist with managing Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 2 of 13 ends

several functions required to professionally deliver a high quality program to youth in our community. The Dodgers Dreamteam Coordinator role is designed to work in partnership with the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation, the local community, and the City of Compton staff to effectively deliver the Dodgers Dreamteam program. The Scope of Services for this Agreement shall in general include, but not necessarily be limited to the Consultant performing the following services:
 Recruit players/participants for the Dodgers Dreamteam program, resulting in full rosters for the City of Compton
 Recruit and assign coaches for all of the Dodgers Dreamteam programs at our site(s).
 Set goals and establish plans to continue to grow participation in the Dodgers Dreamteam program with a specific focus on girls, teens and all minority youth.  Manage and coordinate Field Champions to maximize participation and engagement in the community. Field Champions are assigned to you by LADF through a partnership with Up2Us Sports.
 Serve as a liaison in your community to engage kids and families in the Dodgers Dreamteam program and educate them about what the program has to offer.
 Communicate directly with parents and families to help them understand the logistics of the program operations. This includes ongoing and frequent communications with parents.
 Serve as the primary point of contact for LADF staff with City of Compton.

LADF staff will work with the Dodgers Dreamteam Coordinator to provide resources to support the implementation of the program, including equipment and uniforms.
 Manage all scheduling associated with the Dodgers Dreamteam program.  Attend games and practices and be the visible point of contact for staff, coaches, volunteers and participants in the program.
 Schedule and secure umpires for all Dodgers Dreamteam program games.  Maintain the use of LeagueApps for City of Compton ensuring that player and coach registrations are up-to-date, and all rosters are created and regularly maintained throughout the season.
 Work with LADF to complete SEL surveys for program participants using Hello Insight pre- and post-surveys.
 Create a Parent Advisory Team (PAT) within your agency. This is a volunteer parent involvement group to support parent engagement.
 Promote and recruit participants for ongoing programs that LADF offers.  Be accountable to providing data and information to LADF to support the implementation and growth of the program at City of Compton.

As such services are more fully discussed in the City’s Request for Proposals – “Baseball Coordinator Description RFP”, dated August 7, 2019, and the Consultant’s “Proposal – “Baseball Coordinator Description RFP”, dated September 3, 2019, 2020, both of which are incorporated herein.

Coordinator acknowledges that in entering into this Agreement the City is relying on Consultant's special skills and experience to do and perform the services in Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 3 of 13 ends

accordance with generally accepted standards of professional practice. While performing the services, Consultant agrees to perform all the said services and furnish all the necessary materials at its own cost and expense necessary to complete said services in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances and to the reasonable satisfaction of the City.

Coordinator services hereunder shall be performed in good, workmanlike and professional manner. Consultant shall be responsible for correcting and completing all errors and omissions related to the services provided by the Consultant for this Agreement at no additional cost to the City. “Errors” and “Omissions” for purposes of this paragraph are defined to mean a failure by the Consultant to meet the standards of its profession as set forth in the preceding paragraph. The acceptance of the services by City does not release Consultant from these obligations.

Coordinator will be responsible for employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the services. All of Consultant's staff will be qualified by training and experience to perform their assigned tasks. Consultant will give its personal attention to the fulfillment of the provisions of this Agreement by all of its employees and sub-contractors, if any, and will keep the services under its control. On request of City, if any employee or sub-contractor of Consultant fails or refuses to carry out the provisions of this Agreement or appears to be incompetent or to act in a disorderly or improper manner, Consultant will discharge said employee or sub-contractor from performing services pursuant to provisions of this Agreement.

Name, title of Coordinator shall be primarily responsible for representing Coordinator in performance of this Agreement.

Aubrey Relf, Grants Manager, is hereby designated as the City’s Representative for this Project/Agreement.

2. Duration of Contract.The term of this Agreement shall commence on Notification to Proceed from the City to the Coordinator and shall terminate upon completion of the services to be performed (i.e. completion of Dodger DreamTeam Programs).

Coordinator will generally adhere to any schedule set forth by the City provided, that City will grant reasonable extensions of time for the performance of the services occasioned by unusually lengthy governmental reviews of Consultant’s Work Product or other unavoidable delays occasioned by unforeseen circumstances; provided, further, that such unavoidable delay will not include strikes, lockouts, work stoppages, or other labor disturbances conducted by, or on behalf of, Consultant’s officers or employees.

Coordinator acknowledges the importance to City of City’s schedule and agrees to put forth its best professional efforts to perform the services in a manner consistent with that schedule. City understands, however, that Consultant’s performance must be governed by sound practices. Consultant will work such overtime or engage such Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 4 of 13 ends

personnel and equipment as necessary to maintain the schedule, without additional compensation.

3. Compensation.The method of payment for performance of all of the agreed services pursuant to this Agreement will be on an agreed time and material lump sum basis of a not-to-exceed amount of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000.00). Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties in writing, the total price paid the Consultant will include compensation for all work, including travel, materials, supplies, vendor services, expenses and subcontracted work. No additional compensation will be paid to the Consultant, unless there is a change in the scope of the work or the scope of the project.

In the instance of a change in the scope of work or scope of the project, adjustment to the total compensation will be negotiated between the Consultant and the City. Adjustment in the total compensation will not be effective until authorized and approved in writing by the Parties.

If Consultant fails to submit required deliverables according to schedule or as required by the Agreement, except for those amounts that are due and not reasonably in dispute, the City shall have the right to delay payment and/or terminate this Agreement in accordance with the provisions noted herein.

Consultant shall be reimbursed within thirty (30) days, or as promptly as fiscal procedures may permit, upon receipt by the City of itemized invoices for services completed. Invoices shall be submitted no later than 45 calendar days after the performance of services for which the Consultant is billing. Invoices shall detail the services performed. Invoices shall be delivered or mailed to the Grants Manager at the following address: City of Compton, 205 South Willowbrook Avenue, Compton, California 90220.

In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for the undisputed reasonable value of services performed to the effective date of termination, including any non-cancellable obligations incurred prior to termination; provided, however, that the City may condition payment of such compensation upon the Consultant’s delivery to the City of any and all City property, documents, reports, records, materials and work product associated with the performance of this Agreement.

4. Ownership of Materials.All product produced by Consultant or its agents, employees, and subcontractors pursuant to this Agreement (the “Work Product”) is the property of City, excluding proprietary and intellectual information, and program processes to be agreed upon on a case by case basis. In the event this Agreement is terminated, all Work Product produced by Consultant or its agents, employees and subcontractors pursuant to this Agreement will be delivered to City pursuant to the termination clause of this Agreement.

The Work Product may be used by City and its agents, employees, representatives, and assigns, in whole or in part, or in modified form, for all purposes City may deem advisable, without further employment of or payment of any compensation to Consultant; provided, however, that if this Agreement is terminated for any reason prior to completion of the Project and if under such circumstances City uses, or engages the Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 5 of 13 ends

services of and directs another consultant to use the Work Product, City agrees to hold Consultant harmless from any and all liability, costs, and expenses relative to claims arising out of matters and/or events which occur subsequent to the termination of this Agreement as a result of causes other than the
fault or negligence of Consultant, or anyone for whose acts it is responsible, in preparation of the Work Product. Consultant will not be responsible for deficiencies attributable to modifications of the Work Product performed by others, or that arise from use of the Documents in connection with a project or site other than that shown in the Work Product.

5. Independent Contractor Status.Consultant, its officers, employees, subcontractors, agents and volunteers (collectively hereinafter the “Consultant”), is a wholly independent Consultant and not an officer, employee, subcontractor or agent of the City of Compton, and is not authorized to act on behalf of the City. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have any control over the conduct of the Consultant, except as expressly set forth in this Contract. Consultant expressly warrants that while engaged in carrying out and complying with any terms and conditions of this Contract that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner, represent that Consultant is in any manner officers, employees, agents or volunteers, joint venture or partner of the City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement, health care or any other benefit that accrue to City officials, officers, or employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim to such rights. Consultant will not be eligible for any employee benefits, nor will City make deductions from any amounts payable to Consultant of taxes or insurance. All payroll and employment taxes, insurance, and benefits shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. Consultant retains the right to provide services for others during the term of this Contract.

The payment(s) made to Consultant pursuant to the Agreement will be the full and complete compensation to which Consultant is entitled. City will not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of Consultant or its agents, employees or subcontractors.

City will not pay any workers' compensation insurance, retirement contributions or unemployment contributions on behalf of Consultant or its employees or subcontractors.

Consultant agrees to indemnify and pay City within thirty (30) days for any tax, retirement contribution, social security, overtime payment, unemployment payment or workers' compensation payment which City may be required to make on behalf of Consultant or any agent, employee, or Consultant of Consultant for work done under this Agreement.

At the City’s election, City may deduct the amounts paid pursuant to this Section, from any balance owing to Consultant.

6. Successors, Assignment and Delegation.City and the Consultant each binds themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other hereto and to partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party in respect to all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in this Agreement.

The expertise and experience of Consultant are material considerations for this Agreement. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or the performance of any of Consultant’s obligations under this Agreement without the prior Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 6 of 13 ends

written consent of the City. Any attempted assignment or transfer of any of Consultant’s rights, duties or obligations arising under this Agreement shall be null and void.

7. Nondiscriminatory Employment Practices.During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, sex, creed, color, religion, age, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political affiliation, handicap or belief in accordance with requirements of City, State or Federal laws and regulations. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, sex, creed, color, religion, age, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political affiliation, handicap or belief in accordance with requirements of City, State or Federal laws and regulations. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoffs or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees, applicants and subcontractors for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause.

In the event of the Consultant’s non-compliance with the non-discrimination clause of this Agreement, this Agreement may be immediately canceled, terminated or suspended in whole or in part.

8. Subcontracting.Consultant's services are unique and personal. Except as may be specified in Consultant’s Proposal and agreed to by the City, Consultant will not subcontract any portion of the services without prior written approval of City Manager or his/her designee. If Consultant subcontracts any of the services, Consultant will be fully responsible to City for the negligent acts, errors and omissions of Consultant's subcontractor and of the persons either directly or indirectly employed by the subcontractor, as Consultant is for the negligent acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant. Nothing contained in this Agreement will create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor of Consultant and City. Consultant will be responsible for payment of subcontractors. Consultant will bind every subcontractor and every subcontractor of a subcontractor by the terms of this Agreement applicable to Consultant's work unless specifically noted to the contrary in the subcontract and approved in writing by City.

9. Other Consultants.The City reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with the services.

10. Indemnification.Consultant shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers (collectively hereinafter the “City”), against any and all damages to property or injuries to or death of any person or persons, including property and employees or agents of the City and shall indemnify and save the City from any and all liability and expense including reimbursement of reasonable defense costs and legal fees, and claims, demands, suits, actions or proceedings of any kind or nature, including Workers’ Compensation claims, of or by anyone whomsoever to the extent resulting from or arising out of the negligent, reckless or willful misconduct for the Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 7 of 13 ends

Consultant, its officers, employees, sub-consultants, subcontractors or agents in the performance of the duties undertaken by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement.

This indemnification and hold harmless obligation does not extend to claims arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

11. Insurance.Without limiting the Consultant’s indemnification of the City, Consultant shall obtain and maintain, at its cost and expense, for the duration of the Agreement and any and all amendments, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise out of or in connection with performance of the services by Consultant or Consultant’s agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. The insurance will be obtained from an insurance carrier admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California. Such evidence shall specifically identify this Agreement and shall contain express conditions that the City is to be given written notice at least thirty (30) days in advance of any termination or implementation of a reduction of limits or material change of insurance coverage as specified herein.

Failure on the part of the Consultant to procure or maintain insurance shall constitute a material breach upon which the City may immediately terminate this Agreement. All insurance required hereunder shall be primary with respect to any insurance maintained by the City.

Coverage’s and Limits. Consultant will maintain the types of coverage’s and minimum limits indicated below, unless the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney approves a lower amount. These minimum amounts of coverage will not constitute any limitations or cap on Consultant's indemnification obligations under this Agreement. City, its officers, agents, volunteers and employees make no representation that the limits of the insurance specified to be carried by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are adequate to protect Consultant. The coverage will contain no special limitations on the scope of its protection to the below-designated insureds except for Workers Compensation and errors and omissions insurance. Consultant will obtain occurrence coverage, excluding Professional Liability, which will be written as claims- made coverage. If Consultant believes that any required insurance coverage is inadequate, Consultant will obtain such additional insurance coverage, as Consultant deems adequate, at Consultant's sole expense.

11.1 Commercial General Liability Insurance. $1,000,000 combined single-limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If the submitted policies contain aggregate limits, general aggregate limits will apply separately to the work under this Agreement or the general aggregate will be twice the required per occurrence limit.

11.2 Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability. Workers' Compensation limits as required by the California Labor Code and Employer's Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability insurance will not be required if Consultant has no employees and provides, to City's satisfaction, a declaration stating this.

Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 8 of 13 ends

11.3 Professional Liability. Errors and omissions liability appropriate to Consultant’s profession with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per claim. The coverage shall also provide an extended two (2) year reporting period commencing upon termination or cancellation of this Agreement.

Endorsements. For Commercial General Liability Insurance, Consultant will ensure that the policies are endorsed to name the City of Compton and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers as “additional insured’s” with respect to liability arising out of the contractual activities of the Consultant.

Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City. Prior to City's execution of this Agreement, Consultant will furnish certificates of insurance and endorsements to City.

Waiver of Subrogation. The policies shall contain a waiver of subrogation for the benefit of City.

12. Permits and Licenses.Consultant, at its own expense, during the term of this Agreement, shall obtain and maintain all appropriate business and professional permits, licenses and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services by the Consultant. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Consultant shall show evidence of a business license permit in conformance with Section 9-1.2 of the Compton Municipal Code.

13. Maintenance of Records. Consultant will maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs incurred under this Agreement. All records will be clearly identifiable. Consultant will allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant will allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years, or longer if required by law, from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

14. Warranties.Consultant represents (i) that Consultant has no obligations, legal or otherwise, inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement or with Consultant’s undertaking this relationship with City, (ii) will exercise the professional standard of care in the performance of the services called for by this Agreement not violate any applicable law, rule or regulation or any proprietary or other right of any third party, (iii) that Consultant will not use in the performance of his responsibilities under this Agreement any confidential information or trade secrets of any other person or entity and (iv) that Consultant has not knowingly entered into or will enter into any agreement (whether oral or written) in conflict with this Agreement.

15. General Compliance with Laws. Consultant will keep fully informed of federal, state and local laws and ordinances and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by Consultant, or in any way affect the performance of the services by Consultant. Consultant will at all times observe and comply with these laws, ordinances, and regulations and will be responsible for the compliance of the services with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. In the event the Consultant encounters any Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 9 of 13 ends

conflict between such laws and ordinances, Consultant shall notify the City in writing and the parties agree to work cooperatively to resolve the conflict.

16. Termination.In the event of the Consultant's failure to prosecute, deliver, or perform the services, after giving written notice of default and five (5) days to correct the same, then, in addition to any other remedies, City may terminate this Agreement for nonperformance by notifying Consultant in writing. Consultant has five (5) business days to deliver any documents owned by City and all work in progress to City address contained in this Agreement. City will make a determination of fact based upon the work product delivered to City and of the percentage of work that Consultant has performed which is usable and of worth to City in having the Agreement completed. Based upon that finding City will determine the final payment of the Agreement. In the event City elects to terminate, City will have the right to immediate possession of all Work Product and work in progress prepared by Consultant, whether located at the project site, at Consultant's place of business, or at the offices of a sub- consultant.

The City’s obligation is payable only from funds appropriated for the purpose of this Agreement. All funds for payments after the end of the current fiscal year are subject to the City’s legislative appropriation for this purpose. In the event this Agreement extends into succeeding fiscal year periods and the City Council does not allocate sufficient funds for the next succeeding fiscal year payments, this Agreement shall terminate immediately upon written notice from the City.

Either Party, upon tendering ten (10) calendar days written notice to the other Party, may terminate this Agreement for convenience. In this event and upon request of City, Consultant will assemble the work product without charge and put it in order for proper filing and closing and deliver it to City. Consultant will be paid for work performed to the termination date; however, the total will not exceed the lump sum fee payable under this Agreement. City will make the final determination as to the portions of tasks completed and the compensation to be made.

17. Force Majeure.In the event that performance by either party is rendered impossible (permanently or temporarily) due to acts of war, acts of terrorism, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, or other natural occurrences, strikes, work slowdowns, lockouts (other than lockout by Consultant), or other similar acts to those described above or other causes beyond the reasonable control of such party, and without fault or negligence, said event shall excuse performance by such party, or in the case of temporary impossibility, shall excuse performance only for a period commensurate with the period of impossibility. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon any event that renders performance impossible. In such case, City shall be responsible for payment of compensation for the reasonable value of services rendered to the point at which this Agreement is terminated, but in no event to exceed the total lump sum fee payable under this Agreement.

Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 10 of 13 ends

18. Covenants Against Contingent Fees. Consultant warrants that Consultant has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration contingent upon, or resulting from, the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City will have the right to terminate this Agreement for nonperformance, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of the fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fees, gift, or contingent fee.

19. Certifications.The Contractor, under penalty of perjury, certifies that, except as noted below,
he/she/it or any other person associated therewith in the capacity of owner, partner, director, officer,
manager:
.a Is not currently under suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion, or determination of ineligibility by any Federal, State or local agency; and .b Has not been suspended, debarred, voluntarily excluded or determined ineligible by any
Federal, State or local agency within the past 3 years; and .c Does not have a proposed debarment pending; and
.d Has not been indicted, convicted, or had a civil judgment rendered against him/her/it by a
court of competent jurisdiction in any matter involving fraud or official misconduct in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property within the past 3 years; and
.e Are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in the preceding paragraph; and
.f Have not had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default within the past 3 years.

If there are any exceptions to this certification, insert the exceptions in the following space.
[Supply exceptions on separate page]
For any exception noted above, indicate below to whom it applies, initiating agency, and dates of action.
[Attach separate page]
Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 11 of 13 ends

These certifications are a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. The above certifications are part of this Contract. Signing this Contract on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of the above Certifications.
_________________________________ ___________________ Harold Johnson Date

20. Jurisdiction, Venue and Governing Law. Any action at law or in equity brought by either of the Parties for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for by this Agreement will be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, and the Parties waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in these proceedings to any other county. This agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of California.

21. Testimony.Consultant will testify at City's request if litigation is brought against City in connection with Consultant's services under this agreement. Unless the action is brought by Consultant, or is based upon Consultant's actual or alleged negligence or other wrongdoing, City, upon prior written agreement with Consultant will compensate Consultant for time spent in preparation for testimony, testimony, and travel at Consultant's standard hourly rates at the time of actual testimony.

22. Waivers.The waiver by either Party of any breach or violation of any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement or of any applicable law will not be deemed to be a waiver of such term, covenant, condition or law or of any subsequent breach or violation of same or of any other term, covenant, condition or law. The acceptance by either Party of any fee or other payment which may become due under this Agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding breach or violation by the other Party of any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement or any applicable law.

23. Authority.The individuals executing this Agreement each represent and warrant that they have the legal power, right and actual authority to bind their respective Party to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

24. Severability.If any term, provision, condition or covenant of this Agreement or its application to any party or circumstances shall be held, to any extent, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term, provision, condition or covenant to persons or circumstances other than those as to whom or which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

25. Confidentiality. All documents, reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant in connection with the performance of the Services pursuant to the Agreement are confidential until released by the City to the public, and the Consultant will not make any of these documents or information available to any individual or organization not employed by the Consultant or the City without the written consent of the City before any such release.

Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 12 of 13 ends

26. Amendments.This Agreement may be modified or amended only be written document executed by both Consultant and City’s City Manager and approved as to form by the City Attorney. Such document shall expressly state that it is intended by the parties to amend the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

27. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated by it embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter of it. The City Manager is authorized, in consultation with the City Attorney, to agree to non-material amendments to this Agreement. Neither this Agreement nor any of its provisions may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except in a writing signed by both parties.

28. Notices.Any notices required or permitted under this Agreement shall be effective when delivered in person; and effective one (1) business day after delivery by facsimile transmission; and effective five (5) days after mailing by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as follows:

To Coordinator: Harold Johnson
4935 ½ Hayter Avenue
Lakewood, California 90712
(323) 667-6395
To City: City of Compton
205 South Willowbrook Avenue
Compton, California 90220
Attn: Aubrey Relf, Grants Manager
(310) 605-5500

In the event of any change of address, the moving party is obligated to notify the other party of the change of address in writing. Each party may amend, supplement and update the notice list to add, delete or replace any listed individuals; however, the amendment must be in writing.

29. Miscellaneous.No provision of this Agreement is to be interpreted for or against either party because that party or that party’s legal representative drafted such provision.

Should either party hereto, or any representative, successor or assign of either party hereto, resort to litigation to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the party or parties prevailing in such litigation shall be entitled, in addition to such other relief as may be granted, to recover its or their reasonable attorney’s fees and costs in such litigation from the party or parties against whom enforcement is sought.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CONSULTANT has executed this Agreement, and the CITY, by its City Manager, who is authorized to do so, has executed this Agreement.

Professional Services Agreement – LOS ANGELES DODGERS DREAMTEAM PROGRAM COORDINATOR – Administration/Implementation - Grants Division/Resolution No.

Page 13 of 13 ends

HAROLD JOHNSON

COORDINATOR
Dated: _________ By ________________________________________ Harold Johnson

CITY OF COMPTON
Recommended for Approval:

Dated: _________ By ________________________________________ Aubrey Relf, Grants Manager
Approved by:

Dated: _________ By ________________________________________ Thomas Thomas, City Manager
Approved as to form:

By ___________________________________ Dated: ___________ Eric J. Perrodin, City Attorney
ATTEST:

Dated: __________ By ___________________________________ Alita Godwin, City Clerk
July 12, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A PURCHASE ORDER

TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD

TO REPAY UNSPENT MONEY FROM THE CALIFORNIA WATER AND

WASTEWATER ARREARAGE PAYMENT PROGRAM GRANT IN THE

AMOUNT OF ONE HUNDRED FIFTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED

NINETY-THREE DOLLARS AND FIFTY-EIGHT CENTS
($115,893.58)

SUMMARY
This resolution requests that City Council authorize the City Manager to issue a purchase order to the California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) to repay unspent money from the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program (Water Arrearages Program) grant in the amount of $115,893.58.

BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic made it difficult for many Californians to pay their bills due to job loss and other hardships. As a result, many water systems throughout California that provide water services to customers were financially impacted. The hardships suffered led to the State Water Board creating the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program to provide financial relief to community water and wastewater systems for their customer’s unpaid bills related to the pandemic, through $985,000,000 in federal funding, which was allocated by the State Legislature.

On September 21, 2021, the State Water Board adopted the final guidelines for the Water Arrearages Program, which came with strict stipulations on how the money was to be allocated to customer accounts. The stipulations also detailed that any amount that did not meet the final guidelines must be returned to the State Water Board. The funds were to be used to cover drinking water charges from residential and commercial customers accrued between March 4, 2020 and June 15, 2021, including both active and deleted accounts; the grant could also be used to cover the administrative costs that are associated with administering the program.

On October 11, 2021, the Municipal Water Department (Department) submitted the application for the Water Arrearages Program grant, and we were notified of an award in the amount of $704,973.91, on November 17, 2021. Ultimately, the City received the grant funds on November 29, 2021. The funds were accepted on December 21, 2021, when

8.8. Staff Report – Repay Unspent Funds to
State Water Board for Water Arrearages Program Grant
July 12, 2022, page 2
City Council adopted Resolution No. 25,595; which amended the Department’s 2021- 2022 Fiscal Year Budget to accept and appropriate funds from the State Water Board in the amount of $704,973.91, and facilitated implementation of the Department’s proposed activities for the funds.

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The final program guidelines required that the Department allocate the funds towards eligible customer accounts within 60 days from the date the check was received (November 29, 2021). In order for a customer to be deemed eligible, per program guidelines, the customer had to have unpaid water debt that was accrued between March 4, 2020 and June 15, 2021 that remained unpaid as of December 22, 2021. If a customer made any payment(s) towards their outstanding balance, the amount of bill credit they received would be lowered or eliminated, depending on the customer’s payment amount.

When the Department applied for grant funds in October 2021, we requested $684,440.69 for bill credits to residential and commercial customer accounts, and $20,533.22 in administrative costs for administering the program, because at that time that was the maximum amount we could request that was aligned with program guidelines.

The following table conveys the proposed use of funds:

No. Of Accounts Amount
Residential 1,245 $563,258.43
Commercial 98 $121,182.26
Subtotal 1343 $684,440.69
Administrative Costs (3%) $20,533.22
Total $704,973.91
The Department attempted to expend the funds as quickly as possible to ensure the funds were allocated to every account that continued to meet state guidelines. City Council accepted the funds on December 21, 2021, and the Department applied the funds in the form of bill credit to all eligible accounts on December 22, 2021 and December 23, 2021.

The following table conveys how grant funds were ultimately allocated:

No. Of Accounts Amount
Residential 993 $500,816.22
Commercial 82 $81,585.41
Subtotal 1075 $582,401.63
Administrative Costs $6,678.70
Total $589,080.33
The difference between the amount requested and the amount allocated to customer accounts is directly contributed to the fact that there were customers who paid their Staff Report – Repay Unspent Funds to
State Water Board for Water Arrearages Program Grant
July 12, 2022, page 3
delinquent water debt that was accumulated between March 4, 2020 and June 15, 2021, after we applied for grant funds, but before the funds could be allocated towards their accounts, which made them ineligible to receive the bill credit, per state guidelines.

ALTERNATIVES
There are no alternatives, unspent funds are required to be returned to the State Water Board.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with repayment of the Water Arrearages Program grant funds, as the funds are recorded in unearned revenue:

ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
2686-000-000-2093 Unearned Grant Revenue $115,893.58

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached resolution, which authorizes the City Manager to issue a purchase order to the State Water Board to repay unspent money from the Water Arrearages Program grant in the amount of $115,893.58

DON NGUYEN

WATER DEPARTMENT GENERAL MANAGER
APPROVED FOR FORWARDING:

THOMAS THOMAS

CITY MANAGER
RESOLUTION NO. ___________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A PURCHASE ORDER

TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD

TO REPAY UNSPENT MONEY FROM THE CALIFORNIA WATER AND

WASTEWATER ARREARAGE PAYMENT PROGRANM GRANT IN THE

AMOUNT OF ONE HUNDRED FIFTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED
NINETY-THREE DOLLARS AND FIFTY-EIGHT CENTS ($115,893.58) WHEREAS, the California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) created the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program (Water Arrearages Program) to provide financial relief to community water and wastewater systems for their customer’s unpaid bills related to the pandemic, through $985,000,000 in federal funding, which was allocated by the State Legislature; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 2021, the State Water Board adopted the final guidelines for the Water Arrearages Program, which came with strict stipulations on how the money was to be allocated to customer accounts; and WHEREAS, the funds were to be used to cover drinking water charges from residential and commercial customers accrued between March 4, 2020 and June 15, 2021, including both active and deleted accounts; the grant could also be used to cover the administrative costs that are associated with administering the program; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2021, the Municipal Water Department (Department) submitted the application for the Water Arrearages Program grant, and we were notified of an award in the amount of $704,973.91 on November 17, 2021, and we received the check on November 29, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the funds were accepted on December 21, 2021, when City Council adopted Resolution No. 25,595; which amended the Department’s 2021-2022 Fiscal Year Budget to accept and appropriate funds from the State Water Board in the amount of $704,973.91, and facilitated implementation of the Department’s proposed activities for the funds; and
WHEREAS, the Department applied for grant funds in October 2021, and we requested $684,440.69 for bill credits to residential and commercial customer accounts, and $20,533.22 in administrative costs for administering the program, which totaled $704,973.91; and
WHEREAS, the Department attempted to expend the funds as quickly as possible to ensure the funds were allocated to every account that continued to meet state guidelines. City Council accepted the funds on December 21, 2021, and the Department applied the funds in the form of bill credit to all eligible accounts on December 22, 2021 and December 23, 2021; and
WHEREAS, ultimately, the Department only allocated $582,401.63 for bill credits to residential and commercial customer accounts, and $6,678.70 in administrative costs for administering the program, which totaled $589,080.33; and WHEREAS, the Department is requesting that the unspent amount, which totals $115,893.58 be returned to the State Water Board, per stated guidelines; and WHEREAS, the funds are available in Unearned Grant Revenue in Account No. 2686-000-000-2093.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Resolution No. ____________

Page 2 ends

SECTION 1. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to issue a purchase order to the State Water Board in the amount of one hundred fifteen thousand eight hundred ninety-three dollars and fifty-eight cents ($115,893.58).

SECTION 2. That the $115,893.58 be allocated from the Unearned Grant Revenue Fund, and increase expenditures in Account No. 2686-000-000-2093 (Unearned Grant Revenue) by $115,893.58 for this expenditure.

SECTION 3.That a copy of this Resolution shall be filed in the offices of the City Manager, City Controller, City Clerk and the Compton Municipal Water Department.

SECTION 4.That the Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.

ADOPTED this _______ day of ________________, 2022.
________________________________

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF COMPTON
ATTEST:
____________________________________

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF COMPTON: ss
I, Alita Godwin, City Clerk of the City of Compton, hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council, signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk at a regular meeting thereof held on the _______ day of _______________,2022.

That said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
___________________________________

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF COMPTON
July 12, 2022
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A PURCHASE ORDER
TO WATERLINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR THE FURNISHING AND

DELIVERY OF CHLORINE CHEMICALS IN THE AMOUNT OF ONE
HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($150,000.00)

SUMMARY
Adoption of this resolution will authorize the City Manager to issue a purchase order to Waterline Technologies, Inc. in the amount of $150,000.00 annually, for the Furnishing and Delivery of Chlorine Chemicals for the following three (3) Fiscal Years, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and 2024-2025.

BACKGROUND
The Municipal Water Department (“Department”) is responsible for overseeing the City’s utility services. The Water Operations and Production Divisions are responsible for constructing, inspecting, maintaining and repairing the City’s water mains, gate valves, fire hydrants, and water services to provide adequate potable water to citizens and businesses of Compton.

The Department follows State and Federal Health Regulations for the disinfection of public water supplies. The disinfection step provides the required levels to ensure the adequate inactivation of viruses and bacteria in the source water supplies that are delivered to the public. Therefore, it is crucial to operations to acquire the furnishing and delivery of chlorine chemicals for the Department’s water supply.

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
On March 28, 2022, the Department opened the Request for Proposal (RFP) process to solicit bids for the Furnishing and Delivery of Chlorine Chemicals. The Department attempted to solicit quotes from three (3) reputable chlorine chemical companies; however, upon the submission deadline of April 28, 2022, we were only able to garner responses from two (2) companies.

9.9. Staff Report – Resolution to Authorize P.O. Waterline July 12, 2022 Page 2
The companies and responses are listed below:

Vendor Purchase Price
Waterline Technologies, Inc. $138,308.63
Northstar Chemical $250,250.00
After a thorough review of the submitted quotes, staff has determined that Waterline Technologies, Inc. was deemed the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

Furthermore, due to the nature of market conditions on the supply, the pricing for the term of the contract must reflect actual market conditions. Pricing will remain stable for at least 90 days, but may be subject to an increase at any time throughout the life of the agreement, depending solely upon the actual price per gallon of Sodium Hypochlorite.

The current quote of $138,308.63 is based on the current price of Sodium Hypochlorite, which is $1.93 per gallon; this amount is not guaranteed to remain the same throughout this agreement. Therefore, the Department is including a request for an additional $11,691.37 to cover any fluctuations in the cost of Sodium Hypochlorite during the agreement, which bring the total amount to $150,000.00, per year.

ALTERNATIVES
Staff does not recommend any alternatives.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds will be allocated annually during the budget development process in the Department’s Chemical Purchases Account, upon adoption of those budgets.

Account No. Account Description Amount
5000-870-000-4340 Chemical Purchases $150,000.00

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council adopt the attached Resolution, which authorizes the City Manager to issue a purchase order to Waterline Technologies, Inc. in the amount of $150,000.00 annually for the Furnishing and Delivery of Chlorine Chemicals for the following three (3) Fiscal Years, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and 2024-2025.

DON NGUYEN

WATER DEPARTMENT GENERAL MANAGER
APPROVED FOR FORWARDING:

THOMAS THOMAS

CITY MANAGER
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A PURCHASE ORDER
TO WATERLINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR THE FURNISHING AND

DELIVERY OF CHLORINE CHEMICALS IN THE AMOUNT OF ONE
HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($150,000.00)
WHEREAS, the the Municipal Water Department (Department) is responsible for overseeing the City’s utility services. The Water Operations and Production Divisions are responsible for constructing, inspecting, maintaining and repairing the City’s water mains, gate valves, fire hydrants, and water services to provide adequate potable water to citizens and businesses of Compton; and
WHEREAS, the Department follows State and Federal Health Regulations for the disinfection of public water supplies. The disinfection step provides the required levels to ensure the adequate inactivation of viruses and bacteria in the source water supplies that are delivered to the public. Therefore, it is crucial to operations to acquire the furnishing and delivery of chlorine chemicals for the Department’s water supply; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2022, the Department opened the Request for Proposal process to solicit bids for the furnishing and delivery of chlorine chemicals, which closed on April 28, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the Department solicited quotes from the following qualified chlorine chemical companies:

Waterline Technologies, Inc. $138,308.63
Northstar Chemical $250,250.00
WHEREAS, staff has determined that Waterline Technologies, Inc. was deemed the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, the current quote of $138,308.63 is based on the current price of Sodium Hypochlorite, which is $1.93 per gallon; this amount is not guaranteed to remain the same throughout this agreement. Therefore, the Department is including a request for an additional $11,691.37 to cover any fluctuations in the cost of Sodium Hypochlorite during the agreement, which bring the total amount to $150,000.00, per year; and
WHEREAS, the funds will be allocated annually during the budget development process in the Department’s Chemical Purchases Account, and an increase expenditures in Account No. 5000-870-000-4340 (Chemical Purchases) by $150,000.00 for this expenditure, on an annual basis for the duration of this agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: That the quote from Waterline Technologies, Inc. is hereby accepted and all of the other quotes are rejected.

SECTION 2: That the City Manager is hereby authorized to issue a purchase order in the amount of $150,000.00 annually for the Furnishing and Delivery of Chlorine Chemicals for the following three (3) Fiscal Years, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and 2024- 2025.

Resolution No.

Page 2 ends

SECTION 3. That $150,000.00 be allocated during the budget development process in the Chemical Purchases Account, and increase expenditures in Account No. 5000-870-000-4340 (Chemical Purchases) by $150,000.00 for this expenditure, on an annual basis for the duration of this agreement.

SECTION 4. That a certified copy of this Resolution shall be filed in the offices of the City Manager, City Attorney, City Controller, City Clerk and the Water Department.

SECTION 5. That the Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.

ADOPTED this day of , 2022.

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF COMPTON
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF COMPTON: ss
I, Alita Godwin, City Clerk of the City of Compton, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Compton, signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 2022.

That said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS-

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF COMPTON
July 12, 2022
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A PURCHASE ORDER

TO FERGUSON WATERWORKS FOR THE DELIVERY OF STORE

SUPPLIES FOR STOCKING OF THE WATER WAREHOUSE, RPM

POLYMER CONSTRUCTION METER BOXES AND COVERS, LEAD

FREE MULTI JET WATER METERS, FIRE HYDRANTS, AND GATE

VALVES IN THE AMOUNT OF SIX HUNDRED NINETY-FOUR

THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-THREE DOLLARS AND
FOURTEEN CENTS ($694,123.14)

SUMMARY
Adoption of this resolution will authorize the City Manager to issue a purchase order to Ferguson Waterworks in the amount of $694,123.14 annually for the Delivery of Store Supplies for Stocking of the Water Warehouse, RPM Polymer Construction Meter Boxes and Covers, Lead Free Multi Jet Water Meters, Fire Hydrants, and Gate Valves for the following three (3) Fiscal Years, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and 2024-2025.

BACKGROUND
The Municipal Water Department (Department) is responsible for overseeing the City’s utility services. The Water Operations and Production Divisions are responsible for constructing, inspecting, maintaining and repairing the City’s water mains, gate valves, fire hydrants, and water services to provide adequate potable water to the citizens and businesses of Compton.

It is imperative that the Department maintain a reliable company that provides industrial supplies, such as meter boxes and covers, water meters, fire hydrants, and gate valves; which ensures the Water Operations and Production Divisions possess the adequate equipment needed to execute their daily tasks. Furthermore, by maintaining a company who provides the essentials needed to maintain our water system will enable us to continue delivering potable water to the citizens and businesses of Compton.

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
On March 28, 2022, the Department opened the Request for Proposal (RFP) process to solicit bids for the Delivery of Store Supplies for Stocking of the Water Warehouse, RPM

10.10. Staff Report – Resolution to Authorize P.O. Ferguson Waterworks July 12, 2022 Page 2
Polymer Construction Meter Boxes and Covers, Lead Free Multi Jet Water Meters, Fire Hydrants, and Gate Valves, which closed on April 28, 2022. The Department received quotes from four (4) industrial supply companies.

The companies and responses are listed below:

Vendor Purchase Price
Core & Main $705,369.14
Brandon Supply Corporation $1,289,878.68
Ferguson Waterworks $694,123.14
So. Cal. Compton Pipe Supply Co. $515,834.14 (Incomplete Proposal) After a thorough review of the quotes submitted, staff has determined that Ferguson Waterworks was deemed the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Unfortunately, So. Cal. Compton Pipe Supply Co. did not submit a complete quote; therefore, they were unable to be considered for the project.

ALTERNATIVES
Staff does not recommend any alternatives.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds in the amount of six hundred ninety-four thousand one hundred twenty-three dollars and fourteen cents ($694,123.14) will be allocated annually during the budget development process in the following accounts:
Meter Exchange Expense Account
Vault Maintenance Account
Gate Valve Maintenance Account
Maintenance/Repair-Hydrants Account
Store Purchases (Inventory) Account
ACCOUNT NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
5000-860-000-4235 Store Purchases (Inventory) $25,000.00 5000-870-000-4235 Store Purchases (Inventory) $25,000.00 5000-880-000-4235 Store Purchases (Inventory) $344,123.14 5000-880-000-4757 Maintenance/Repair-Hydrants $100,000.00 5000-880-000-4762 Gate Valve Maintenance $100,000.00
5000-880-000-4763 Vault Maintenance $40,000.00
5000-880-000-4764 Meter Exchange Expense $60,000.00
Staff Report – Resolution to Authorize P.O. Ferguson Waterworks July 12, 2022 Page 3

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council adopt the attached Resolution, which authorizes the City Manager to issue a purchase order to Ferguson Waterworks in the amount of $694,123.14 annually for the Delivery of Store Supplies for Stocking of the Water Warehouse, RPM Polymer Construction Meter Boxes and Covers, Lead Free Multi Jet Water Meters, Fire Hydrants, and Gate Valves for the following three (3) Fiscal Years, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and 2024-2025.

DON NGUYEN

GENERAL MANAGER

MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR FORWARDING:

THOMAS THOMAS

CITY MANAGER
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A PURCHASE ORDER TO

FERGUSON WATERWORKS FOR THE DELIVERY OF STORE SUPPLIES

FOR STOCKING OF THE WATER WAREHOUSE, RPM POLYMER

CONSTRUCTION METER BOXES AND COVERS, LEAD FREE MULTI JET

WATER METERS, FIRE HYDRANTS, AND GATE VALVES IN THE AMOUNT

OF SIX HUNDRED NINETY-FOUR THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY- THREE DOLLARS AND FOURTEEN CENTS ($694,123.14)
WHEREAS, the the Municipal Water Department (Department) is responsible for overseeing the City’s utility services. The Water Operations and Production Divisions are responsible for constructing, inspecting, maintaining and repairing the City’s water mains, gate valves, fire hydrants, and water services to provide adequate potable water to citizens and businesses of Compton; and
WHEREAS, it is imperative that the Department maintain a reliable company that provides industrial supplies, such as meter boxes and covers, water meters, fire hydrants, and gate valves; which ensures the Water Operations and Production Divisions possess the adequate equipment needed to execute their daily tasks; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2022, the Department opened the Request for Proposal (RFP) process to solicit bids for the Delivery of Store Supplies for Stocking of the Water Warehouse, RPM Polymer Construction Meter Boxes and Covers, Lead Free Multi Jet Water Meters, Fire Hydrants, and Gate Valves, which closed on April 28, 2022.; and WHEREAS, the Department received quotes from the following industrial supply companies:

Vendor Purchase Price
Core & Main $705,369.14
Brandon Supply Corporation $1,289,878.68
Ferguson Waterworks $694,123.14
So. Cal. Compton Pipe Supply Co. $515,834.14 (Incomplete Proposal) WHEREAS, staff has determined that Ferguson Waterworks was deemed the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, funds in the amount of six hundred ninety-four thousand one hundred twenty-three dollars and fourteen cents ($694,123.14) be allocated annually during the budget development process in the Meter Exchange Expense, Vault Maintenance, Gate Valve Maintenance, Maintenance/Repair-Hydrants, and Store Purchases (Inventory) Fund(s); and
WHEREAS, an increase of expenditures be allocated in the following accounts:

ACCOUNT NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
5000-860-000-4235 Store Purchases (Inventory) $25,000.00 5000-870-000-4235 Store Purchases (Inventory) $25,000.00 5000-880-000-4235 Store Purchases (Inventory) $344,123.14 5000-880-000-4757 Maintenance/Repair-Hydrants $100,000.00 5000-880-000-4762 Gate Valve Maintenance $100,000.00
5000-880-000-4763 Vault Maintenance $40,000.00
5000-880-000-4764 Meter Exchange Expense $60,000.00

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMPTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Resolution No.

Page 2 ends

SECTION 1: That the quote from Ferguson Waterworks is hereby accepted and all of the other quotes are rejected.

SECTION 2: That the City Manager is hereby authorized to issue a purchase order to Ferguson Waterworks in the amount of $694,123.14 annually for the Delivery of Store Supplies for Stocking of the Water Warehouse, RPM Polymer Construction Meter Boxes and Covers, Lead Free Multi Jet Water Meters, Fire Hydrants, and Gate Valves for the following three (3) Fiscal Years, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and 2024-2025.

SECTION 3. That $694,123.14 be allocated annually during the budget development process on an annual basis for the duration of this agreement, funds will be available in the following accounts:

SECTION 5. That the Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.

ADOPTED this day of , 2022.

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF COMPTON
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

That said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS-
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS-

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF COMPTON

Compton City CouncilJuly 12, 2022

Compton City Council
July 12, 2022