City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.a
September 27, 2022
space, which is in conformance with the regulations and standards for the zoning district. No known sensitive uses as defined in CMC Chapter 5.80 are located within 250 feet of the subject property.
3. The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the persons residing in the immediate area nor be detrimental or injurious to property or persons in the general neighborhood or to the general welfare of the residents of the city as a whole.
Approval of the Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of residents of the City. The Development Agreement, Conditional City Cannabis License, Minor Exception, and Administrative Permit contain conditions of approval, including a Safety and Security plan that will ensure the use will not impact surrounding businesses and properties. The Development Agreement contains commitments from Authentic Concord, LLC codified through adoption of the Agreement by the City Council to provide community benefits with the purpose of youth drug use prevention and education efforts, drug treatment and mental health programs, including programs providing supervised diversion from the criminal justice system to avoid recidivism, workforce development, small business assistance, providing amenities for public use and enjoyment, including streetscape and sidewalk improvements and public art installations, event programming and other activation of public space, and improving quality of life and providing economic opportunities.
4. The Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values.
The proposed business will be occupying an existing building. The Applicant will be making minor changes to the exterior of the building, including new storefront windows, paint touch-up, and wall mounted lights but no changes that would adversely affect the orderly development of property. The Applicant will also be making exterior improvements to the site, including new landscaping, reconfiguring parking spaces, and a new trash enclosure. These improvements will help preserve property values for the area.
5. The Development Agreement is consistent with California Government Code sections 65864 through 65869.5
Approval of the Development Agreement between the City and Authentic Concord, LLC is in conformance with the provisions and intent of Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5 for the following reasons:
Assurances have been provided to the Developer due to vesting certain regulations.
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.a
September 27, 2022
The Developer has a legal or equitable interest in real property and the City will recover from the direct costs associated with the consideration of the Development Agreement.
The Development Agreement contains a provision requiring an annual review for compliance with the terms of the Agreement, including provisions allowing for the modification or termination of the Agreement if it is found the Developer has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
The Development Agreement specifies the duration, the permitted uses of the property, and the required land use approvals.
The Agreement is enforceable by any party thereto.
L. Design and Site Review
Staff has reviewed the proposed project architecture, layout, and landscaping for conformance with the WMX development standards.
Building Architecture and Site Design. The applicant is not proposing any major changes to the elevations of the existing building. The proposed changes include replacing exterior doors with storefront windows, removal of the overhang on the east side of the building and repainting the building where necessary. Other improvements include reconfiguring parking spaces and addition of a trash enclosure and bicycle rack, as well as upgrading parking lot lighting to LED lights and ADA path of travel.
Landscape. Existing landscaping at the site will remain. The applicant proposes to replant the empty landscape area along the Galaxy Way frontage and, based on the parking spaces that will be eliminated, add approximately 245 square feet of new landscaping (due to parking reconfiguration of the parking spaces) located on the west side of the building. The overall plan represents an increase in landscaped areas compared to existing conditions. The improvements are consistent with the CDC requirements.
Signs. Per the Development Code, storefront cannabis retailers are permitted one sign, which can only include the business name. The project complies with this requirement; one sign is proposed on the main (south) frontage of the building, and will consist of 46-inch-tall letters spelling “STIIIZY.” No logos or other identifying marks are proposed with the signage. The total sign area is 31.5 square feet. The proposed signage is consistent with the allowed sign area of the WMX zoning district.
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.a
September 27, 2022
Pursuant to CDC Section 18.415.100, findings are required for approval of the Design and Site Review application. Staff analysis on how the project meets those findings is provided below and, in the resolution, attached as Attachment 1, to this report.
1. The project is consistent with the General Plan.
The project is consistent with the General Plan as explained in Section E above.
2. The project meets the following criteria in Section 18.415.080 (Design Criteria):
(a) The building design and landscaping supports public safety and security by allowing for surveillance of the street by people inside building and elsewhere on the site.
The applicant is not proposing any structural changes to the building. The new storefront windows, which decreases the number of entrances from five to two, to minimize the points of access to the building, enhances the safety and security of the site. The new windows will continue to support public safety and security by allowing for surveillance of the street and parking lot by people within the building. The landscaping improvements are minimal and located along the street frontage on Galaxy Way and to the west of the building and will not obstruct views. Furthermore, as part of the review for obtaining a City Cannabis License, Authentic is required to submit a security plan that is reviewed and approved by the Concord Police Department. Therefore, the project and building design supports public safety and security.
(b) The design is compatible with the historical or visual character of any area recognized by the City as having such character.
The area is not recognized as a historical, architectural, or scenic area by the City.
(c) The project design preserves major views and vistas along major streets and open spaces and trails and enhances them by providing project amenities.
The site and surrounding area are flat and have no topographically significant features, such as valleys, hillsides, or ridgelines that provide scenic views or vistas. The site is not near any open space or trail. (d) The proposed lighting and fixtures are designed to complement on-site buildings, are of an appropriate scale for the development, and provide adequate light for safety and security while minimizing glare.
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.a
September 27, 2022
Exterior wall mounted lighting will complement the Spanish-style of the building (Attachment 5). The only change to the parking lot lighting is to upgrade the lighting source (bulbs) to LED. Authentic is required to submit a security plan to be reviewed and approved by the Concord Police Department, which will ensure there is adequate lighting for safety. (e) All mechanical, electrical, and utility equipment is located, screened, or incorporated into the design of the buildings so as not to be visible from off-site, and screening devices are consistent with the exterior colors and materials of the buildings.
All existing and proposed mechanical equipment will be adequately screened with landscaping to reducing its visual impact. (f) The overall design of the project, including its scale, massing, site plan, exterior design, and landscaping, enhances the appearance and features of the project site and surrounding natural and built environment.
As mentioned previously, Authentic will not be making any substantial changes to the existing building’s façade or site design. The building’s storefronts will be replaced to remove three points of building access but will be replaced with windows in similar design to the storefronts.
Landscaping will be replaced to fill in currently barren areas and additional landscaping will be added with the reconfiguration of the parking lot, which will in turn enhance the appearance of the project site. (g) The project design is appropriate to the function of the project and will provide an attractive and comfortable environment for occupants, visitors, and the general community.
Authentic is proposing to establish a cannabis storefront retail business within an existing building. A majority of the work required to establish this use involves interior enhancements to accommodate the business operation as well as replacing existing entrances with new storefront windows, repainting the building, where appropriate and reconfiguring the parking lot to enhance the circulation of the site for the proposed use.
There are no proposed additions or changes to the building footprint or envelope. Minor exterior and site improvements are proposed such as replanting barren landscape areas and the construction of new site amenities such as a trash enclosure and bicycle parking that will enhance the overall look and functionality of the site. Therefore, the project design is appropriate to the function of the project and will provide an attractive and comfortable environment.
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.a
September 27, 2022
(h) The architectural details, colors, materials, and landscaping are internally consistent, fully integrated with one another, and used in a manner that is visually consistent with the proposed architectural design.
The minor changes proposed to the building’s exterior will not modify the architectural style or details of the building. New landscaping areas and upgrades to existing landscaping are proposed that will also enhance the site and complement the surrounding area.
(i) The project is compatible with neighboring development in a similar Zoning District by avoiding large differences in building scale and character and provides a harmonious transition between the proposed project and surrounding development.
The project proposes to occupy an existing building with a distinct architectural style. Changes proposed to the building are minor and would not affect its scale and character.
(j) The project creates an attractive and visually interesting built environment with a variety of building styles and designs, and well-articulated structures that present varied building facades, rooflines, and building heights within a unifying context.
The project proposes to occupy an existing building with minimal exterior modifications proposed that will enhance its attractiveness and not impact the well-articulated building. On-site improvement such as the trash enclosure, will be designed with the same color and materials as the building which will contribute to a visually interesting built environment. (k) The landscaping is compatible with and enhances the architectural character of the buildings and site features, and blends with the surrounding landscape. Landscape elements complement the buildings and rooflines through color, texture, density, and form. Landscaping is in scale with on-site and off-site buildings, and plantings have been selected and located to avoid conflicts with views, lighting, infrastructure, utilities, and signage.
Authentic proposes to replant empty landscape areas along the frontage and increase parking lot landscaping. This landscaping will fill in a gap within the existing landscaping to provide a more complete look along the street frontage. Further enhancements include the addition of shade trees among the new parking spaces.
(l) Stormwater treatment areas have been integrated into the landscape design.
The project is not proposing any changes to any impervious areas, and thus is not affecting any existing stormwater control elements at the site.
The project has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and will be
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.a
September 27, 2022
constructed in conformance with the City’s guidelines based on the project scope.
(m) New construction does not need to match existing surrounding development or buildings; however, the design shall complement or enhance existing development.
New development at the site will consist of a new trash enclosure that will have similar materials and colors of the existing building. Other modification to the building such as new storefront window will not alter the appearance of the building.
3. The project overall reflects design principles and/or incorporates design features that are consistent with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City Council that are in effect at the time of approval.
The project meets this finding for the following reasons:
(a) The project proposes minor modification’s that will enhance the overall character of the building and site;
(b) The proposed changes will freshen the look of the existing building; (c) Existing mechanical equipment will be screened from view; (d) The applicant will provide new short term and long-term bicycle parking; and
(e) The landscaping along the street frontage will be enhanced, and increased within the parking lot.
M. Hazardous Waste
The California Environmental Protection Agency provides a list of data resources that provides information regarding the facilities or sites identified as meeting the “Cortese List” requirements. A component of the Cortese List includes the list of leaking underground storage tank (LUST) sites from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker database.
The project site is on a parcel identified on the SWRCB’s GeoTracker website as a closed leaking underground storage tank (LUST) cleanup site in association with the use of the property as a car dealership. The LUST cleanup is related to former underground storage tanks (USTs) that were used to store gasoline located near the northwest corner of the parcel. The project site is on the southern boundary of the parcel and does not appear to have overlapped with the LUST cleanup site. A gasoline leak that occurred in 1986 initiated an investigation by the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB). A site investigation and remedial actions were completed and a No Further Action Required was granted in 1995.
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.a
September 27, 2022
Additionally, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was conducted for the entire site and the car dealership to the north. Although several recognized environmental conditions (RECs) were identified, none occurred on the project site. In June of 2020, a Phase II Environmental Assessment was performed to determine the extent to which the existing RECs may influence the property conditions. The Phase II Environmental Site Assessment included several soil borings and groundwater samples. Results showed that although very low levels of volatile organic compounds and harmful metals were detected in the soil samples, the reported concentrations were below San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Levels. Therefore, additional investigation was not warranted, as constituents detected during the investigation would not pose a threat to human health or the environment.
Financial Impact
If approved, the Applicant will be required to make financial contributions to the City in the form of a Community Benefit, as required by the Development Agreement. The Applicant will be required to contribute one percent of Developer’s Cannabis Gross Annual Revenues, or $20,000 (whichever is greater) to advance community benefit programs, as well as five percent of Developer’s Cannabis Business Gross Receipts in financial incentives to the City. Consistent with the City’s conservative budgeting protocols, the future public benefit revenues and the future financial incentives revenues are not programmed into the budget at this time. Rather, they will be programmed by Council once revenue is received.
Environmental Determination
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively “CEQA”), the proposed project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the Common Sense Exemption. The activity is covered by the common sense exemption in that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.
An Exemption Memorandum (Attachment 6) prepared by Raney Planning & Management Inc., provides substantial evidence showing that the proposed project can be considered exempt from CEQA under guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).
Public Contact
The City Council Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website. Notification was mailed to all owners and occupants of property within five-hundred (500) feet of the subject parcel at least 10 days prior to the public hearing, and has been published in the
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.a
September 27, 2022
East Bay Times, as required by state law and the Concord Municipal Code. This item has also been posted at the subject site at least 10 days prior to the public hearing.
Additionally, notice has been provided to all interested parties on the City Cannabis enotification list.
Attachments
1. Resolution for an Administrative Permit, Minor Exception, Design and Site Review
Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval
2. Development Agreement Ordinance
Exhibit A: Authentic Concord, LLC Development Agreement
3. Project Plans
4. Transportation Memorandum dated April 25, 2022
5. Wall mounted lighting details
6. Exemption Memorandum dated August 12, 2022
1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD,
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A Resolution Approving an Administrative
Permit, Minor Exception, and, Design and Site
Review, for a Cannabis Storefront and Delivery
Retail Business at 1045 Galaxy Way, APN: 126-
325-004 (PL21153 – AA, ME, DR, DA).
Authentic Concord, LLC (dba “Stiiizy”)
Resolution No. 22-XX
/
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2018, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 18-3, which amended the Municipal Code and Development Code to establish a Commercial Cannabis Overlay District, associated development standards, and a licensing framework for medicinal-only cannabis manufacturing and distribution, and adult-use and medicinal testing laboratories; and WHEREAS, on April 2, 2019, the City Council and Planning Commission conducted a Joint Study Session and directed staff to pursue revisions to the existing cannabis regulations to potentially allow additional commercial cannabis uses including adult-use and medicinal non-storefront retail; and consideration of allowing adult-use and medicinal storefront retail and microbusinesses; and WHEREAS, on November 5, 2019, the City Council considered introduction of an Ordinance amending Concord Municipal Code Chapter 5.80 (Cannabis) to add adult-use City Cannabis Licenses for manufacturing and distribution; to increase the maximum number of City Cannabis Licenses for manufacturing, distribution, and testing laboratories; to allow City Cannabis Licenses for medicinal and adult-use retail (storefront and non-storefront); and allow City Cannabis Licenses for microbusinesses. At the meeting, the City Council provided direction to staff regarding the allowable number of each cannabis license type, and directed staff to bring the Development Code amendments required for implementing corresponding changes to the Concord Development Code to the Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on May 26, 2020, the City Council Adopted Ordinance No. 20-4, Amending Concord Municipal Code Chapter 5.80 (Cannabis) and Development Code (Title 18) to Allow AdultUse City Cannabis Licenses for Manufacturers and Type 13 Distributors; Increase the Maximum Attachment 1
2 Number of City Cannabis Licenses for Manufacturers, Type 13 Distributors, and Testing Laboratories, and Allow City Cannabis Licenses for Retail (Storefront and Non-Storefront), Microbusinesses, and Type 11 Distributors; and
WHEREAS, on July 28, 2020, the City Council approved the procedure, criteria, and scoring for a merit-based competitive process to review and select eligible applicants to apply for available City Cannabis Licenses for cannabis storefront retailers, non-storefront retailers, and microbusinesses with a storefront retail component; and
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2020 the City of Concord issued a Request for Proposals for storefront retailers, non-storefront retailers, and microbusinesses with a storefront retail component; and
WHEREAS, on May 26, 2021, following interviews, public comment, and City Council deliberation, Authentic Concord, LLC was invited to apply for one of three available storefront retail cannabis licenses; and
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2021, Authentic Concord, LLC (dba “Stiiizy”) (“Applicant” or “Authentic”), submitted an Administrative Permit, Minor Exception, Design and Site Review and Development Agreement applications to establish a cannabis storefront retail use at 1045 Galaxy Way, APN 126-325-004 (“Property”), (herein collectively referred to as “Project”); and WHEREAS, on April 21, 2022, the Project was deemed complete by staff; and WHEREAS, on May 18, 2022, the Planning Commission continued the application to a date uncertain to give the applicant and staff time to address issues raised after the agenda was published; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after giving all public notices required by state law and the Concord Municipal Code, held a duly noticed public hearing on September 7, 2022 on the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, at such public hearing, the Planning Commission considered all oral and written information, testimony, and comments received during the public review process, including
3 information received at the public hearing, the oral report from City staff, the written report from City staff dated September 7, 2022, the application materials, and other exhibits presented (hereinafter referred to as “Planning Commission Information”); and
WHEREAS, after consideration of all pertinent plans, documents and testimony, the Planning Commission voted 4-0 (AYES: Mizutani, Laub, Barbour, Mercurio) to adopt a Resolution No. 22- 07PC Recommending the City Council Approve an Administrative Permit, Minor Exception, Design and Site Review, and Ordinance for a Development Agreement for a Cannabis Storefront Retail Use Located at 1045 Galaxy Way (PL21153 – AA, ME, DR, DA) for Authentic Concord, LLC (dba “STIIIZY”); (APN: 126-325-004), subject to the draft Conditions of Approval contained herein as Exhibit A (“Conditions of Approval”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after giving all public notices required by State law and the Concord Municipal Code, held a duly noticed public hearing on September XX, 2022 on the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, at such public hearing, the City Council considered all oral and written information, testimony, and comments received during the public review process, including information received at the public hearing, the oral report from City staff, the written report from City staff dated September 27, 2022, the application materials, and other exhibits presented, and the Planning Commission Information, which are maintained at the offices of the City of Concord City Clerk declared its intent to adopt a Resolution approving an Administrative Permit and Design and Site Review for a cannabis storefront retail business at 1045 Galaxy Way, subject to the Conditions of Approval contained herein as Exhibit A (“Conditions of Approval”) (collectively hereinafter referred to as “City Council Information”); and
WHEREAS, at such public hearing, the City Council also considered an Ordinance Approving and Adopting a Development Agreement By and Between the City of Concord and Authentic Concord, LLC, Regarding the Development of Property Located at 1045 Galaxy Way, Assessor’s Parcel Number: 126-325-004 (“Ordinance 22-XX”).
4 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. All of the facts set forth in the Recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.
Section 2. The City Council has reviewed, considered, and evaluated the City Council Information, all other pertinent plans, documents, and testimony prior to acting upon Resolution.
Section 3. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council has based its recommendation are located in and may be obtained from the City of Concord Clerk’s Office, 1950 Parkside Drive, Concord 94519.
Section 4. CEQA.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively “CEQA”), the proposed Project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the “Common Sense Exemption”. The activity is covered by the common sense exemption in that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The August 12, 2022 Exemption Memorandum prepared by Raney Planning & Management Inc., which is attached to the September 27, 2022 City Council staff report and incorporated by reference herein, demonstrates with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed project would have a significant impact upon the environment. Therefore, the project can be considered exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3)and no further environmental review is warranted. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.
Section 5. General Plan.
West Concord Mixed Use (WCMU). The General Plan designation of the property is West
5 Concord Mixed Use (WCMU). The Project will result in a general retail use occupying an existing building. The WCMU designation is intended for a mix of office and commercial development, including such uses as new auto dealer, hotels, restaurant, and showroom/warehouses. As a retail use, the Project is consistent with this land use designation.
1. The Project is consistent with General Plan policy E-2.1.7 which states, “Support the creation of job and contracting opportunities for Concord residents and businesses through the establishment of local hire preference, apprenticeships, internships, and other programs which support local hiring, training, and skill enhancement.” Authentic anticipates hiring between 35 and 45 employees for the business and aims to hire 75% of employees within a five-mile radius of the project site and up to 85% of the employees directly from the Concord and the broader Contra Costa region.
2. The Project is consistent with General Plan policy LU-9.1.3 which states, “Require new commercial development to provide comprehensive landscaping, including hardscape and parking lot area as well as previous areas.” The applicant will be making minor but noticeable improvements to the building and site, including new storefront windows, repainting the building as necessary, installing new landscaping, trash enclosure, bike racks, and upgrading the ADA path of travel from Galaxy Way. These improvements will enhance the look of the site and contribute to the overall attractiveness of the area.
3. The Project is consistent with General Plan policy LU-10.1.5 which states, “Require trees and other landscaping within parking lots.” The project will upgrade the existing parking lot with new landscaping including shade trees.
4. The Project is consistent with General Plan policy LU-6.1.2 which states, “Provide sites for employment-generating businesses, technology-based businesses, and light industrial uses wishing to locate in Concord.” Based on Authentic’s proposal, the proposed cannabis storefront retailer would be hiring employees directly from the Concord community and anticipate providing 35 to 45 jobs that pay a living wage.
6 5. The Project is consistent with General Plan policy S-7.1.1 which state, “Evaluate the effects of new development on law enforcement service and take public safety issues into account when reviewing land use proposal.” The potential effects of the proposed cannabis storefront retail business have been evaluated to ensure appropriate measures will be in place to enhance public safety. The measures include: 1) a Security Plan reviewed and approved by the Chief of Police that requires, among other things, a commercial burglar alarm monitoring system and video surveillance system, procedures for verifying identification of customers entering and leaving the retail establishment, and on-site security guards; 2) Neighborhood Compatibility Plan and the designation of a Community Relations Officer to respond to any complaints from the public, customers, and businesses with respect to the cannabis operations or property; and 3) an Annual Review Report with the City that requires documentation on how complaints from the community were addressed.
Section 6. Development Code.
As documented in the Project application materials, the Project will not be making any changes to the footprint or envelope of the existing building, and therefore meets all applicable development standards of West Concord Mixed Use (WMX) zoning district. Additionally, the Project will be subject to Conditions of Approval to further ensure consistency with applicable Development Code standards including the design and landscape requirement, parking and circulation.
Section 7. Minor Exception.
The project complies with the following findings in Section 18.425.060 (Minor Exception) of the City’s Development Code:
1. No practical alternative exists that will result in a superior project with regard to its appearance, relationship with existing buildings and improvements, visibility, and impacts to neighboring properties. The proposed design and layout of the parking spaces is the preferred alternative because it provides efficient use of the existing parking lot and is decreasing the overall number of existing parking spaces by six. The area where the six parking spaces are located will be replaced with landscaping which will enhance the site’s appearance.
7 2. Other provisions of the development code will not be compromised. The project will comply with all other applicable CDC standards for the WMX zoning district, with the exception of providing two excess parking spaces.
3. No negative impact will result. There is sufficient space for the additional parking spaces and they do not negatively impact access, safety, or circulation.
4. The project will otherwise comply will all applicable development code standards and requirements. The project is required to obtain a building permit and will comply all other CDC standards.
Section 8. Design and Site Review.
The Project includes minor building and site modifications that meet the following for Design and Site Review approval.
1. The Project is consistent with the General Plan as addressed in the findings above.
2. The Project meets the following criteria in Section 18.415.080 (Design Criteria) of the City’s Development Code:
(a) The building design and landscaping supports public safety and security by allowing for surveillance of the street by people inside buildings and elsewhere on the site. The building design and landscaping supports public safety and security by allowing for surveillance of the street by people inside the building and elsewhere on the site. The applicant is not proposing any structural changes to the building. The new storefront windows, which decreases the number of entrances from five to two, to minimize the points of access to the building, enhances the safety and security of the site. The new windows will continue to support public safety and security by allowing for surveillance of the street and parking lot by people within the building. The landscaping improvements are minimal and located along the street frontage on Galaxy Way and to the west of the building, and will not obstruct views. Furthermore, as part of the review for obtaining a City Cannabis License, Authentic is required to submit a security plan that is reviewed and approved by the Concord Police Department. Therefore, the Project and building design supports public safety and security.
8 (b) The design is compatible with the historical or visual character of any area recognized by the City as having such character. The area is not recognized as a historical, architectural, or scenic area by the City.
(c) The project design preserves major views and vistas along major streets and open spaces and trails and enhances them by providing project amenities. The site and surrounding area are flat and have no topographically significant features, such as valleys, hillsides, or ridgelines that provide scenic views or vistas. The site is not near any open space or trail. (d) The proposed lighting and fixtures are designed to complement on-site buildings, are of an appropriate scale for the development, and provide adequate light for safety and security while minimizing glare. Exterior wall mounted lighting will complement the Spanish style of the building. The only change to the parking lot lighting is to upgrade the lighting source (bulbs) to LED. Authentic is required to submit a security plan that is reviewed and approved by the Concord Police Department, which will ensure there is adequate lighting for safety. (e) All mechanical, electrical, and utility equipment is located, screened, or incorporated into the design of the buildings so as not to be visible from off-site, and screening devices are consistent with the exterior colors and materials of the buildings. All existing and proposed mechanical equipment will be adequately screened with landscaping to reduce its visual impact.
(f) The overall design of the project, including its scale, massing, site plan, exterior design, and landscaping, enhances the appearance and features of the project site and surrounding natural and built environment. As mentioned previously, Authentic will not be making any substantial changes to the existing building’s façade or site design. The building’s storefronts will be replaced to remove three points of building access, but will be replaced with windows in a similar design to the storefront. Landscaping will be replaced to fill in current barren areas and additional landscaping will be added with the reconfiguration of the parking lot, which will in turn enhance the appearance of the project site.
9 (g) The project design is appropriate to the function of the project and will provide an attractive and comfortable environment for occupants, visitors, and the general community.
Authentic is proposing to establish a cannabis storefront retail business within an existing building. A majority of the work required to establish this use involves interior enhancements to accommodate the business operation as well as replacing existing entrances with new storefront windows, repainting the building, where appropriate and reconfiguring the parking lot to enhance the circulation of the site for the proposed use. There are no proposed additions or changes to the building footprint or envelope.
Minor exterior and site improvements are proposed such as replanting barren landscape areas and the construction of new site amenities such as a trash enclosure and bicycle parking that will enhance the overall look and functionality of the site. Therefore, the project design is appropriate to the function of the project and will provide an attractive and comfortable environment. (h) The architectural details, colors, materials, and landscaping are internally consistent, fully integrated with one another, and used in a manner that is visually consistent with the proposed architectural design. The minor changes proposed to the building’s exterior will not modify the architectural style or detail of the building. New landscaping areas and upgrades to existing landscaping are proposed that will also enhance the site and complement the surrounding area. (i) The project is compatible with neighboring development in a similar Zoning District by avoiding large differences in building scale and character and provides a harmonious transition between the proposed project and surrounding development. The project proposes to occupy an existing building with a distinct architectural style. Changes proposed to the building are minor and would not affect its scale and character.
(j) The project creates an attractive and visually interesting built environment with a variety of building styles and designs, well-articulated structures that present varied building facades, rooflines, and building heights within a unifying context. The project proposes to occupy an existing building with minimal exterior modifications proposed that will enhance its attractiveness and not impact the well-articulated building. On-site improvements such as the trash enclosure will be
10 designed with the same color and materials as the building, which will contribute to a visually interesting built environment.
(k) The landscaping is compatible with and enhances the architectural character of the buildings and site features, and blends with the surrounding landscape. Landscape elements complement the buildings and rooflines through color, texture, density, and form. Landscaping is in scale with on-site and off-site buildings, and plantings have been selected and located to avoid conflicts with views, lighting, infrastructure, utilities, and signage. Authentic proposes to replant empty landscape areas along the frontage and increase parking lot landscaping. This landscaping will fill in a gap within the existing landscaping to provide a more complete look along the street frontage.
Further enhancements includes the addition of shade trees among the new parking spaces. (l) Stormwater treatment areas have been integrated into the landscape design.
The Project is not proposing any changes to any impervious areas, and thus is not affecting any existing stormwater control elements at the site. The Project has been reviewed by the Engineering Division, and will be constructed in conformance with the City’s guidelines based on the Project scope.
(m) New construction does not need to match existing surrounding development or buildings; however, the design shall complement or enhance existing development. New development at the site will consist of a new trash enclosure that will have similar materials and colors of the building. Other modifications to the building such as new storefront windows will not alter the appearance of the building.
3. The project overall reflects design principals and/or incorporates design features that are consistent with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City Council that are in effect at the time of approval. The project meets this finding for the following reasons:
(a) The project proposed minor modification’s that will enhance the overall character of the building and site;
(b) The proposed changes will freshen the look of the existing building; (c) Existing mechanical equipment will be screened from view;
11 (d) The applicant will provide new short term and long-term bicycle parking; and (e) The landscaping along the street frontage will be enhanced, and increased within the parking lot.
Section 9. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon the effective date of Ordinance 22-XX.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Concord on September, 27, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 22-XX was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord on September 27, 2022.
Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Susanne Meyer Brown
City Attorney
Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
AUTHENTIC CONCORD LLC
PL21153, AA, ME, DR, DA
1045 GALAXY WAY
APN: 126-325-004
PERMIT DESCRIPTION
1. These Conditions apply to and constitute approval of an Administrative Permit (PL21153 – AA), for a 5,323 square foot cannabis storefront retail use with delivery.
2. These Conditions apply to and constitute the approval of a Minor Exception (PL21153 – ME), to the development standards to exceed the required number of parking spaces by two parking spaces.
3. These Conditions apply to and constitute approval of Design and Site Review (PL21153 – DR), for modifications to an existing 5,323 square foot building and associated site improvements including new storefront windows, reconfigured parking, landscaping, and a new trash enclosure.
4. The improvements, business, and operations shall be in conformance with the applicant’s Zoning Compliance Fact Sheet received September 2, 2021, and in compliance with the City Cannabis License for the business (PL21153), revised project plans received January 28, 2022, modified in writing and approved by the Planning Division. No activities associated with the businesses operations shall occur outside of the area shown on the approved floor plan. The following exhibits are approved and shall be incorporated as Conditions of Approval:
Plan Date Prepared Prepared By Sheet
Cover Sheet 11-29-2021 TWA Architect DR0.1
Overall Site Plan 1-27-22 TWA Architect DR1.0
Enlarged Demo Site Plan 11-29-21 TWA Architect DR1.1
Enlarged Site Plan 1-27-22 TWA Architect DR1.2
Site Details 11-29-21 TWA Architect DR1.3
Site Details 1-27-22 TWA Architect DR1.4
Existing Floor Plan 9-1-21 TWA Architect DR2.0
Proposed Floor Plan 1-27-22 TWA Architect DR2.1
Roof Plan 1-27-22 TWA Architect DR4.1
Exterior Elevations 1-27-22 TWA Architect DR5.2
Exterior Elevations 1-27-22 TWA Architect DR5.1
Preliminary Landscape Plan 1-27-22 BK & Associates Inc. L-1A Photometric Plan 1-27-22 TWA Architect PH-1
Signage 11-29-21 TWA Architect SN-1
5. Prior to Building Permit final inspection, the Planning Division and Police Department shall conduct a final inspection to verify compliance with this Administrative Permit and Exhibit A to Attachment 1
the City Cannabis License (PL21153). The applicant shall contact the Police Department and Planning Division, [email protected] and [email protected], respectively, at least 10 days prior to the desired inspection date.
6. The business is not permitted to operate without a valid state cannabis license. Pursuant to the City Cannabis License (PL21127), the applicant shall obtain maintain a valid state cannabis license (provisional or permanent) for the equivalent state license type(s) to the City Cannabis License. Whenever a new or renewed state license is received, the applicant shall email license to [email protected] and [email protected].
ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT CONDITONS (PLNG, PD)
7. The business hours of operation shall be in conformance with the applicant’s Zoning Compliance Fact Sheet, which indicates: 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily. Days and hours of operation shall not be modified without Planning Division and Police Department approval. The business shall be open to the general public. The Chief of Police may limit the hours for transporter deliveries and pick-ups.
8. The approved use under this Administrative Permit shall not be altered or expanded without written approval from the Police Department and Planning Division. Any proposed change shall require a written request, signed by the City Cannabis Licensee, submitted to the Chief of Police at least 30 days prior to the proposed change. This written request shall not constitute an approval of the proposed change and the proposed change may be denied. An amendment to this Administrative Permit, the City Cannabis License, or other permit may be required for any proposed change.
9. In order to maintain this Administrative Permit, the City Cannabis License shall be renewed pursuant to Concord Municipal Code (CMC) Chapter 5.80 (Cannabis). A license renewal application and any applicable fees shall be submitted at least 60 days before the expiration of the City Cannabis License. Failure to submit a renewal application prior to the expiration date of the license will result in the automatic expiration of the license on the expiration date. License renewal is subject to the laws and regulations effective at the time of renewal, which may be substantially different than the regulations currently in place and may require the submittal of additional information to ensure that the new standards are met. No person shall have any entitlement or vested right to receive a license under CMC Chapter 5.80 (Cannabis).
10. Maintain at all times all licenses and permits as required by the State of California, and provide immediate notification to the Chief of Police if any state license or permit is suspended or revoked.
11. Any person who delivers cannabis to a customer must have in possession a copy of the city cannabis delivery license, which shall be made available upon request to law enforcement.
12. Delivery of cannabis shall be directly to the physical residence of the customer or secure exchange location at the Concord Police Department; deliveries to any other location are prohibited.
13. No licensee shall transport or cause to be transported cannabis in excess of the limits established by state law during the course of delivering cannabis.
14. A security plan must include procedures for verifying identification of customers both before entering the retail establishment and again before receiving cannabis or cannabis products.
15. A theft prevention plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Chief of Police or designee.
16. On-site security guard(s) shall monitor activity within 150 feet of building entrance to ensure no cannabis consumption is occurring in the vicinity of the business, including parking areas.
17. A neighborhood responsibility plan that demonstrates how the business will reduce adverse impacts to the surrounding neighborhood, including neighborhood outreach, methods for future communication, and dispute resolution, shall be submitted and approved by the city.
18. Cannabis and cannabis products that are not used for display purposes or immediate sale shall be stored in a secured and locked room, safe, or vault, and in a manner reasonably designed to prevent diversion, theft, and loss.
19. The business owner shall take reasonable steps to discourage and correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance in parking areas, sidewalks, alleys and areas surrounding the premises during business hours if directly related to the patrons of the subject retailer. For purposes of this subsection, “reasonable steps” shall include calling the police in a timely manner and requesting those engaging in nuisance activities to cease those activities, unless personal safety would be threatened in making the request.
20. The public entrance shall be ADA accessible.
21. A storefront retail licensee shall not conduct sales exclusively by delivery.
22. The business owner shall remove litter on and in front of the premises and, if necessary, on public sidewalks within 100 feet of the facility two times, with a minimum of four-hour intervals, each operating day.
23. No cannabis business shall be located within 250 feet of a sensitive land use, as defined in CMC Section 5.80.020, except as provided in CMC Section 5.80.060(f) (Sensitive Land Use Hardship). No sensitive land use shall be located in the buffer area that is within 600 feet of the Commercial Cannabis Overlay District (CMC Chapter 18.110). The applicant shall contact the Planning Division and Police Department if any sensitive use (as defined in CMC Section
5.80.020) is identified within 250 feet of the property (measured property line to property line).
24. No cannabis business may sell, store, distribute or allow the consumption of any alcoholic beverages or tobacco products on or at any premises where cannabis is sold.
25. No cannabis business may allow, permit, or provide for the consumption of cannabis products on site where the cannabis business is located, with or without compensation.
26. All uses shall be conducted completely within the building; no outdoor display or storage is allowed. No production, distribution, storage, display or wholesale of cannabis and cannabis products shall be visible from the exterior of the building where the commercial cannabis activity is being conducted, except as authorized by the Chief of Police.
27. Odors shall be contained within the licensed tenant space on which the commercial cannabis activity is located. Cannabis licensees shall prevent all odors generated from the cannabis use from escaping buildings to the extent that odor cannot be detected by a reasonable person of normal sensitivity outside the building, on adjacent properties or public rights-of-way, or within any other unit located within the same building as the cannabis licensee, if the use only occupies a portion of a building. If the City receives any odor complaints that rise to the level of a public nuisance, the cannabis business shall work with the city staff to correct odor concerns.
Unresolved or repeated odor complaints may be the basis for suspension or revocation of the City Cannabis License or denial of City Cannabis License renewal.
28. No cannabis business shall employ anyone who is younger than 21 years of age. No cannabis business shall sell or advertise to sell any cannabis, cannabis product or cannabis accessory to minors, except in circumstances where the minor is over 18 years of age and is permitted or allowed by state law to purchase or possess medicinal cannabis, as set forth in California Business and Professions Code Section 26140, or any successor statute thereto.
29. All cannabis businesses shall maintain a commercial burglar alarm monitoring system, install a video surveillance system, and comply with the security plan approved by the Chief of Police. A cannabis business shall notify the Police Department immediately, and within 24 hours after discovering any of the following:
a. Diversion, theft, loss, or any criminal activity involving the cannabis or cannabis products or any agent or employee of the licensee.
b. The loss or unauthorized alteration of records related to cannabis or cannabis products, registered qualifying patients, primary caregivers or employees or agents. c. Significant discrepancies identified during inventory. d. Any other material breach of security.
30. Labels and packages of cannabis and cannabis products shall meet all state and federal labeling and packaging requirements.
31. City representatives may enter and inspect the property of every cannabis business to ensure compliance and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter, except that the inspection and copying of private medical records shall be made available to the Police Department only pursuant to a properly executed search warrant, subpoena, or court order. Such inspections shall occur during normal regular business hours unless the city has provided prior written notice to the cannabis business for an after-hours inspection. Upon request, the cannabis business shall timely provide the city official with records related to the business, including, but not limited to, utility bills from the commercial energy provider for the premises, inventory, financial records, and inventory tracking records. This section shall not limit any inspection authorized under any other provision of law or regulation.
32. Maintain at all times commercial general liability providing coverage at least as broad as ISO CGL Form 00 01 on an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury with limits of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and comprehensive automobile liability (owned, nonowned, hired) providing coverage at least as broad as ISO Form CA 00 01 on an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury, with limits of not less than $2,000,000. The commercial general liability policy shall provide contractual liability, shall include a severability of interest or equivalent wording, shall include an endorsement that specifies the insurance coverage afforded to the city shall be primary and noncontributory, and shall name the city, its officials and employees as additional insured. Failure to maintain insurance as required herein at all times shall be grounds for suspension of the city cannabis license immediately and, ultimately, revocation.
33. Maintain, for a minimum of seven years, a written accounting or ledger of all cash, receipts, credit card transactions, and reimbursements (including any in-kind contributions), as well as records of all operational expenditures and costs incurred by the licensee in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices and standards typically applicable to business records, which shall be made available to the city during business hours for inspection upon reasonable notice by the Chief of Police.
34. Notify the Chief of Police within three calendar days of any notices of violations or other corrective action ordered by a state or other local licensing authority, and provide copies of the relevant documents.
35. The cannabis business shall obtain all building permits required pursuant to Title 15 for any electrical, plumbing, or other construction activities.
36. Temporary cannabis events shall be prohibited.
37. Any sign(s) requires a permit from the Building Division, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division. Said sign(s) shall comply with the City of Concord Sign Ordinance Chapter
18.180 and any applicable master sign program for the subject site/building.
38. All interior building improvements or alterations, including plumbing or electrical work shall be subject to a City Building Permit.
39. All garbage and recycling (waste) materials shall be stored within the building or an enclosure approved by the City. All indoor and outdoor waste receptacles shall be locked and secured in manner to prevent tampering, theft, and/or removal of any cannabis refuse or the waste receptacle. At no time shall any waste receptacles be located outside of the building, except during pick-up, without prior approval of a building permit for an exterior trash enclosure pursuant to CMC 18.150.150 (Solid waste and recycling storage). Disposal of cannabis, cannabis products, and cannabis waste shall occur in accordance with state law.
40. The cannabis business shall ensure that no cannabis, cannabis byproducts, or associated hazardous materials may be discharged into the sanitary sewer system (including, but not limited to, sinks, toilets, or storm drains).
41. The applicant shall comply with all of the requirements of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, state law, as well as all other applicable City of Concord Planning, Building, and Engineering codes and ordinances.
42. The applicant shall comply with all of the requirements of the Contra Costa Water District. A copy of this approval will be forwarded to the Contra Costa Water District to determine if a water connection upgrade is required. For additional information please contact Shawn Kelly of the Contra Costa Water District at (925) 688-8017.
43. Any change of use, any new building construction, any interior improvements or exterior improvements and modifications, including mechanical, electrical, and plumbing work require a permit from the Building Division. Please contact the Building Division at (925) 671-3107 for those specific requirements, permits and related fees (the Building Division can issue permits to either the real property owner or to licensed contractors).
44. The business shall maintain a valid business license.
45. Incorporate decorative bollards along the south and west sides of the storefront to protect pedestrian and the building from accidental or intentional collisions with vehicles. The quantity and location shall be based on spacing for ADA compliance (and other local laws). Bollards shall be included in the tenant improvement plans and reviewed and approved by the Chief of Police or designee and Planning Division prior to issuance of building permit. The design and placement of the bollards shall return to the Design Review Board as a staff report item.
GENERAL CONDITIONS – DESIGN AND SITE APPROVAL
46. The Conditions are the responsibility of the applicant and all contractors. Compliance shall occur as specified in the Conditions or at one of the following project milestones:
a) With the submittal of Grading, Improvement, Landscape, or Building Plans. b) Prior to issuance of Encroachment, Grading, or Building Permits, whichever comes first.
c) Prior to construction.
d) On-going during renovations and construction.
e) Prior to occupancy approval.
If timing for compliance is not specified, it shall be determined by the Divisions listed after the Condition. (PLNG, BLDG, ENGR)
47. Where a plan or further information is required, it is subject to review and approval by the applicable City Department/Division, as noted at the end of each Condition. The Division listed first shall be the primary contact for implementation of that Condition. (PLNG, BLDG, ENGR)
48. The Conditions of Approval shall be listed on a plan sheet that is included in the construction plan set (Grading, Utility, Landscape and Building Plans). (PLNG, ENGR, BLDG)
49. The project shall comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and Concord Municipal Code (CMC) requirements. (PLNG, BLDG, ENGR)
50. Minor modifications that are found to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans such as colors, plant materials, or minor lot line adjustments, may be approved administratively.
Major modifications shall be approved by the applicable decision making body. (PLNG, ENGR)
51. The project site and area surrounding the site shall be maintained in a weed and litter free condition for the period prior to construction. (BLDG, PLNG)
52. All landscaping within the sight visibility triangles along the driveways must be kept below a maximum of three feet in height per 18.150.170 of the Development Code. (PLNG, TRANS)
53. The trash enclosure shall be sized appropriately to ensure compliance with Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383), subject to review and approval by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit for the trash enclosure.
ARCHITECTURAL
54. Rooftop equipment (HVAC, meters, refrigeration equipment, plumbing lines, ductwork and transformers), shall not extend above the building parapet and shall be screened from view on all sides with materials architecturally compatible with the main structure. Screening details shall be shown on the Building Plans and submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division, prior to the issuance of Building Permits and installed prior to occupancy approval. (PLNG)
55. The west storefront shall be maintained so that the glass, as seen from the outside, will not be unsightly.
56. The bicycle rack style shall be a u-rack, post and loop rack, or wheel well secure rack. (PLNG)
57. Replace the missing and/or damaged barrel tiles located on top of the existing CMU wall. (PLNG)
58. Vents, gutters, downspouts, flashing, electrical conduits, etc., shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Division. Dented or otherwise damaged construction elements should be replaced or repaired to a like-new condition. (PLNG)
59. All fences and walls on the subject property shall conform to the requirements in CMC 18.150.040. (PLNG)
60. Any additional exterior improvements to the building or property not included in the scope of work shall require Design and Site review and approval, as determined by the Planning Division. (PLNG)
TREE PRESERVATION & LANDSCAPING
61. The landscaping and irrigation shall be installed per the approved landscape plan except as modified by these conditions. (PLNG)
62. Two additional 24-inch box trees shall be added to shade the parking spaces located along the west side of the building. (PLNG)
63. All landscaping shall be installed prior to occupancy approval. Contact the Planning Division at least two weeks prior to occupancy, to request a site inspection of all exterior improvements including buildings, driveways, parking lots, landscaping, irrigation, signs, lighting, walls, fences, and trash enclosures. (PLNG)
64. Any vegetation damaged or destroyed by construction activities shall be replaced with like or comparable plant materials, and if damage occurs off-site, the replacement plants shall be approved by the property owner and the Planning Division, prior to occupancy approval. (PLNG)
65. All existing trees within the project boundaries shall be preserved. (PLNG)
LIGHTING
66. All exterior building and parking lot lighting shall provide illumination for safety and shall be installed in a manner that is glare shielded and directed away from adjacent properties and rightof-ways. (PLNG)
67. Submit a Photometric plan for review and approval, showing the location of all light sources, streetlight spacing, intensity of luminance, and uniformity ratio, in accordance with the City’s specifications, with the Improvement, Utility, or Building Plans, whichever comes first. The photometric analysis shall be reviewed by Engineering Services for the determination of streetlight spacing. (ENGR, TRANS, BLDG, PD)
SIGNAGE
68. All signage shall comply with CMC Chapter 18.180 “Signs”. (PLNG) CMC
PARKING
69. All parking spaces shall be striped; full-size spaces shall be 9 ft. by 19 ft; compact spaces shall be 8 ft. by 16 ft. Wheel stops shall be provided, except when parking spaces abut a concrete curb for a landscaped planter, then a two foot overhang is allowed. (PLNG, ENGR) CMC
70. Parking shall comply with CMC Chapter 18.160 “Parking, Loading, and Access”, including motorcycle and bicycle parking spaces, drive aisle and parking space dimensions, turning radii, back-out dimensions, driveway clearances, landscape median dimensions, and other relevant information. (ENGR, PLNG) CMC
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
71. Construct improvements along the frontage on Galaxy Way including but not limited to:
driveway removal; pavement replacement 2.5 feet wide measured perpendicular from face of curb; conforms to existing improvements; and repair/replacement of deficient frontage improvements as determined by the City Engineer, prior to occupancy approval or Acceptance of Improvements. (ENGR)
72. Any trenching for underground utilities shall comply with the modified City Standard Detail S17 for pavement repair and possible slurry placement. (ENGR)
73. Comply with the recommendations from the Traffic Study prepared by Fehr & Peers dated April 25, 2022, including but not limited to:
a) The Project applicant shall contribute to the retiming of the Diamond Boulevard and Concord Avenue traffic signal to provide additional green time for the westbound left turn movement.
Prior to issuance of a development or building permit, whichever comes first, Project applicant shall deposit a sum of $10,000 into a trust account to be used for the purposes of retiming the signal and recalibrating adjacent signals to maintain smooth traffic flow. (TRANS)
74. Construct all public facilities in accordance with the current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), including driveways and curb ramps. (ENGR)
NOISE
75. Noise producing site preparation and construction activities shall be limited to the days and hours as set forth below:
Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Construction on Saturdays may be allowed only upon prior approval by the Building, Engineering, and Planning Divisions. No changes to these construction hours shall be allowed without the prior written consent of the City. A contact person shall be available during all construction activities in the evening and on weekends to respond to complaints and take actions necessary to reduce noise. (BLDG, ENGR, PLNG)
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
76. Contact Engineering Services to arrange for a Pre-Construction Meeting prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits, whichever comes first. (ENGR)
77. Implement a dust and construction noise control plan. Submit the plan to Engineering Services for review and approval prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. (ENGR)
78. Construction equipment shall not be serviced at the site at any time. During construction no deliveries shall be made to the site and no delivery vehicles (including gasoline tanker trucks) shall enter the site between 6:00 p.m. and 7:30 a.m. on weekdays, and between 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. on weekends and federal holidays. Delivery vehicles shall have their engines turned off during unloading. (BLDG, ENGR, PLNG)
79. Employ the quietest construction equipment available, to muffle noise from construction equipment and keep all mufflers in good working order in accordance with State law. (BLDG,
ENGR, PLNG)
80. Implement the following measures during construction:
a) Gather all construction debris on a regular basis and place them in a dumpster or other container that is emptied or removed on a weekly basis. When appropriate, use tarps on the ground to collect fallen debris or splatters that could contribute to storm water pollution.
b) Remove all dirt, gravel, rubbish, refuse, and green waste from the street pavement, and storm drains adjoining the project site. During wet weather, avoid driving vehicles off paved areas.
c) Broom sweep the public street pavement adjoining the project site on a daily basis. Caked-on mud or dirt shall be scraped from these areas before sweeping. d) Install filter materials (e.g., sandbags and filter fabric) at the storm drain inlet nearest the downstream side of the site in order to preclude any debris or dirt from flowing into the City storm drain system. Filter materials shall be maintained and/or replaced as necessary to ensure effectiveness and to prevent street flooding. Dispose of filter particles in an approved trash receptacle. e) Create a contained and covered area on the site for the storage of bags, cement, paints, flammable, oils, fertilizers, pesticides, or any other materials used on the site that have the potential for being discharged to the storm drain system by being windblown or in the event of a material spill.
f) Never clean items such as machinery, tools, and brushes or rinse containers in a street, gutter, or storm drain.
g) Ensure that concrete, gunite, plaster, or similar supply trucks do not discharge wash water into street gutters or drains. (ENGR, BLDG)
81. No equipment shall be started or staging area be established on the streets or the site before or after the specified hours of construction. (ENGR, BLDG)
82. Ensure that no debris or construction scrap material is placed on any adjoining lot, open space area, or street, and that any such material stored on an adjoining site shall be completely removed and the site cleaned, prior to occupancy approval. (ENGR, BLDG)
83. At no time shall campers, trailers, motor homes, or any other vehicle be used as living or sleeping quarters on the construction site unless authorized for site security. (ENGR, BLDG)
84. There shall be no parking of construction equipment or construction worker’s vehicles on adjacent streets at any time; all vehicles shall be maintained on-site. (ENGR, BLDG)
85. Portable toilets used during construction shall be kept as far as possible from adjacent properties, public view and shall be emptied on a regular basis as necessary to prevent odor. (ENGR, BLDG)
CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW/PRE-PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
86. Submit electronic copy of Preliminary Title Report, prepared within three months prior to plan submittal. (ENGR)
87. The proposed buildings are within the Floodplain Zone X. At a minimum, comply with the City of Concord Municipal Code requirements in establishing building finished floor elevations. The Grading Plan shall be referenced to the same elevation datum as the FEMA map, and shall show the finished floor elevations of the proposed buildings, Base Flood Elevations (BFE), and building setback line per CMC. (ENGR) CMC
88. The Improvement Plans shall show frontage improvements including but not limited to: drainage improvements, curb, gutter and sidewalk per City Standard Detail S-10, and driveway construction per City Standard Detail S-14 and repair/replacement of deficient frontage improvements as determined by the City Engineer. Any unusable existing driveway shall be replaced with standard curb, gutter, and sidewalk per S-10 above. Any trenching for utility installation shall comply with the modified City Standard Detail S-17 for pavement repair and possible slurry placement. (ENGR)
89. Design improvements in accordance with the City Standard Plans S-34 and S-36 for sight distance, sidewalk, back up, fencing, geometrics at intersection and corner setback requirements, prior to the Acceptance of Improvements. Plans shall be subject to review and approval by Engineering Services. (ENGR)
90. Obtain a Site Development Permit from the City prior to performing any work within the site and public right-of-way or public easements. (ENGR) CMC
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
91. All grading shall require a Grading and Drainage Plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, a Soils Report prepared by a registered Geotechnical Engineer and receipt of a Grading Permit approved by the City Engineer. The Grading Plans and Soils Report shall require review by the City’s Geotechnical consultant with all costs to be borne by the applicant. (ENGR)
92. Contour grading techniques shall be employed throughout the project to achieve a more natural appearance, even where this will increase the amount of grading. Tops of cuts or toes of fills adjacent to existing public rights-of-way or easements shall be set back two feet minimum from said rights-of-way and easements. All cut-and-fill slopes in excess of five feet in height shall be rounded both horizontally and vertically. (ENGR)
93. Grading on adjacent properties shall require written approval from the affected property owners. (ENGR)
94. On-site finish grading work shall require drainage to be directed away from all building foundations at a minimum slope of 2 percent and a maximum slope of 20 percent toward approved drainage facilities or swales. Non-paved drainage swales shall have a minimum slope of 1 percent. (ENGR)
95. At all times seasonally appropriate erosion control measures shall be implemented per plans approved by the City Engineer for all grading work at all times. Wet season measures shall be in place October through April at a minimum and when rain is otherwise predicted. At the time of approval of the Improvement and/or Grading Plans, an approved Erosion Control Plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer. (ENGR)
96. Submit Grading, Erosion Control, Improvement, to Engineering Services for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading, Encroachment, and Building Permits. Where applicable, evidence of compliance with the State General Construction Permit shall be provided. (ENGR) CMC
97. Comply with the applicable provisions of the Grading Ordinance and the Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. (ENGR) CMC
UTILITIES
98. New electrical transformers shall be placed underground or screened from view. (PLNG, ENGR)
99. No above ground utility facilities/structures shall be located between the face of curb and back of sidewalk in the public right-of-way. (ENGR)
100. All new utilities shall be constructed underground prior to occupancy approval. (ENGR) 101. Submit to Engineering Services a sewer fixture count prior to demolition or renovation. (ENGR) 102. Coordinate all facility adjustments, relocations, or additions to utility services with the appropriate utility companies. (ENGR)
103. Provide cable companies a set of approved site diagrams in electronic format showing the joint trench layout for dry utilities for cable service to be provided to the site. (ENGR) 104. If the project create or replace more than 2,500 square feet of impervious surface, then comply with the small land development project, Appendix C of the stormwater C.3 guidebook 7th edition.
105. Construct stormwater treatment measures per the approved SWCP prior to occupancy approval. (ENGR)
106. Prevent site drainage from draining across sidewalks and driveways in a concentrated manner. (ENGR)
107. Collect and convey all stormwater entering, and/or originating from, the site to an adequate downstream drainage facility. Submit a detailed hydrologic and hydraulic study including calculations for a 100-year storm as well as a capacity study accounting for off-site sources with the Improvement Plans to Engineering Services for review and approval. (ENGR) 108. Install City of Concord “No Dumping, Drains to Creek” curb marker (English and Spanish version) on all catch basins. (ENGR)
109. Include erosion control/storm water quality measures on the final Grading Plan that specifically address measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system. Such measures may include, but are not limited to, hydroseeding, hay bales, sandbags, and siltation fences and are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Director of Building Inspection. If no Grading Plan is required, necessary erosion control/storm water quality measures shall be shown on the Site Plan submitted for an on-site permit, subject to review and
approval of the Director of Building Inspection. The applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that the contractor is aware of and implements such measures. (ENGR, BLDG) 110. Sweep or vacuum the parking lot(s) a minimum of once a month and prevent the accumulation of litter and debris on the site. Corners and hard to reach areas shall be swept manually. If sidewalks and/or the parking lot are pressure washed, debris must be trapped and collected to prevent entry into the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged into the storm drain. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer, subject to the approval of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. (ENGR) 111. Ensure that the area surrounding the project such as the streets stay free and clear of construction debris such as silt, dirt, dust, and tracked mud coming in from or in any way related to project construction. Areas that are exposed for extended periods shall be watered regularly to reduce wind erosion. Paved areas and access roads shall be swept on a regular basis. All trucks shall be covered. (ENGR)
112. Clean all on-site stormdrain facilities a minimum of twice a year, once immediately prior to October 15 and once in January. Additional cleaning may be required if found necessary by the City Engineer/Director of Building Inspection. (ENGR, BLDG)
AGREEMENTS, FEES, BONDS
113. All fees noted below are the fees currently in effect as of July 1, 2021 per the Resolution of Fees and Charges. The fees and charges are reviewed annually as part of the budget public hearing process. Fee adjustments are based on a number of factors and vary depending on the type of fee:
Service-based fees are adjusted annually based on the San Francisco-San Jose-Oakland Area Consumer Price Index;
Improvement based fees (also called impact fees) are adjusted annually based on Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (San Francisco Bay Area); and the Parkland Fee is adjusted per Section 78-95 of the Concord Municipal Code.
The fees become effective as of the date set forth in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 78-6042, Fees and Charges for Various Municipal Services, as most recently amended and approved by the City Council. Persons interested in how a particular fee is calculated should contact the City Department administering the fee or the Finance Department. (ENGR) 114. Pay a Document Imaging fee to reimburse the City for implementation of the Document Imaging and File Retention programs, prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits. (PLNG) 115. All required faithful performance bonds and labor materials bonds in a penal amount equal to 100 percent of the approved estimates of construction costs of improvements shall be submitted to and approved by the City and other agencies having jurisdiction prior to issuance of the site development Permit. (ENGR)
116. Site Development Permit Application:
a) Pay the Filing Fee at the time of submittal of permit application, improvement plans and supporting documents to City Engineering Services for review. b) Provide a restoration security before issuance of the Encroachment Permit. The security shall be in an amount sufficient to restore existing public improvements to a serviceable condition should development improvement activity cause
damage. The amount of the security shall be determined by, and be in a form acceptable to the City Engineer.
c) Provide a $5,000 cash deposit for Erosion Control prior to issuance of Grading Permit. The deposit will be placed in a refundable account. Any unused funds will be returned at project completion. If the initial deposit is insufficient to cover actual costs, an additional deposit in an amount determined by the City Engineer will be required.
d) Pay the Improvement Plan review fee at the time of submittal of Improvement Plans and supporting documents to Engineering Services for review. The current fee is estimated based on the project cost evaluation.
e) Pay the Construction Inspection fee prior to issuance of the Site Development Permit. The current fee is based on the estimated cost of constructing the proposed improvements. (ENGR)
117. Sewer Connection Permit:
Pay Sanitary Sewer connection fee. The current sewer connection fee is $1,009.00 per fixture unit. (ENGR)
118. Traffic Mitigation Fee:
Pay Offsite Street Improvement Program (OSIP) fee prior to issuance of Building Permit. The current OSIP Fee is $8.81 per gross square feet for commercial uses. (TRANS)
OTHER/MISCELLANEOUS
119. Comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. Submit complete sets of plans and specifications to the Fire District for review and approval at:
Contra Costa County Fire Protection District
4055 Port Chicago Highway, Suite 250
Pleasant Hill CA 94520
Plan review fees are assessed at that time. The City is not responsible for the collection of fees or enforcement of requirements imposed by the Fire District. (CCCFPD) 120. The applicant shall defend, (with counsel approved by City), indemnify and hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, and its/their respective agents, officers, officials, volunteers, and employees from and against any and all administrative and/or legal claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void, or annul approval of the project, including without limitation, any related application, permit, certification, condition, environmental determination, other approval, compliance or failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, and/or processing methods (“Challenge”), with the exception of a Challenge arising out of the City’s sole negligence or willful misconduct. The City shall have the right to preapprove any material decision involved in defending any such Challenge, including settlement, and may (but is not obligated to) participate in the defense of any Challenge. If applicant does not promptly defend any Challenge, City may (but is not obligated to) defend such Challenge as City, in its sole discretion, determines appropriate, all at applicant’s sole cost and expense. The applicant shall bear any and all losses, damages, injuries, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, staff time and in-house attorney's fees on a fully-loaded basis, attorney’s fees for outside legal counsel, expert witness fees, court costs, and other litigation
expenses) arising out of or related to any Challenge (“Costs”), whether incurred by Developer, City, or awarded to any third party, and shall pay to the City upon demand any Costs incurred by the City. No modification of the project, any application, permit, certification, condition, environmental determination, other approval, change in applicable laws and regulations, or change in processing methods shall alter the applicant’s indemnity obligation. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474.9, the applicant’s indemnification obligation with respect to any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of City concerning a subdivision (tentative, parcel, or final map application or approval) shall be limited to actions brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37, unless such time period is extended for any reason. The City shall promptly notify applicant of any Challenge, and shall cooperate fully in the defense. (CA) 121. The permit and approval shall expire in one year from the date Ordinance No. 22-XX became effective unless construction permits are obtained and work has begun. (PLNG) 122. A request for a time extension from the expiration date of September 27, 2023 can be considered if an application with required fee is filed at least 10 days before the original expiration date, otherwise a new application is required. A public hearing will be required for all extension applications, except those involving only Design Review. Extensions are not automatically approved. Changes in conditions, City policies, surrounding neighborhood, and other factors permitted to be considered under the law, may require, or permit denial. (PLNG) 123. The City may impose additional conditions of approval, including additional site improvements, when the City Cannabis License extension(s) are granted. (PLNG) 124. The applicant shall duly execute and comply with the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance 22-XX (An Ordinance Approving and Adopting a Development Agreement by and Between the City of Concord and Authentic Concord LLC, Regarding the Development of a Cannabis Storefront Retail at 1045 Galaxy Way, Assessor’s Parcel Number 126-325-004 (PL21153 – AA, ME, DR, DA).
Ord. No. 22-XX 1
ORDINANCE NO. 22-XX
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CONCORD AND
AUTHENTIC CONCORD, LLC (DBA “STIIIZY”), REGARDING THE
DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1045 GALAXY WAY,
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER: 126-325-004
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2018, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 18-3, which amended the Municipal Code and Development Code to establish a Commercial Cannabis Overlay District, associated development standards, and a licensing framework for medicinal-only cannabis manufacturing and distribution, and adult-use and medicinal testing laboratories; and WHEREAS, on April 2, 2019, the City Council and Planning Commission conducted a Joint Study Session and directed staff to pursue revisions to the existing cannabis regulations to potentially allow additional commercial cannabis uses including adult-use and medicinal non-storefront retail; and consideration of allowing adult-use and medicinal storefront retail and microbusinesses; and WHEREAS, on November 5, 2019, the City Council considered introduction of an Ordinance amending Concord Municipal Code Chapter 5.80 (Cannabis) to add adult-use City Cannabis Licenses for manufacturing and distribution; to increase the maximum number of City Cannabis Licenses for manufacturing, distribution, and testing laboratories; to allow City Cannabis Licenses for medicinal and adult-use retail (storefront and non-storefront); and allow City Cannabis Licenses for microbusinesses. At the meeting, the City Council provided direction to staff regarding the allowable number of each cannabis license type, and directed staff to bring the Development Code amendments required for implementing corresponding changes to the Concord Development Code to the Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on May 26, 2020, the City Council Adopted Ordinance No. 20-4, Amending Concord Municipal Code Chapter 5.80 (Cannabis) and Development Code (Title 18) to Allow AdultUse City Cannabis Licenses for Manufacturers and Type 13 Distributors; Increase the Maximum Number of City Cannabis Licenses for Manufacturers, Type 13 Distributors, and Testing Attachment 2
Laboratories, and Allow City Cannabis Licenses for Retail (Storefront and Non-Storefront), Microbusinesses, and Type 11 Distributors; and
WHEREAS, on July 28, 2020, the City Council approved the procedure, criteria, and scoring for a merit-based competitive process to review and select eligible applicants to apply for available City Cannabis Licenses for cannabis storefront retailers, non-storefront retailers, and microbusinesses with a storefront retail component; and
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2020 the City of Concord issued a Request for Proposals for storefront retailers, non-storefront retailers, and microbusinesses with a storefront retail component; and
WHEREAS, on May 26, 2021, following interviews, public comment, and City Council deliberation, Authentic Concord, LLC was invited to apply for one of three available storefront retail cannabis licenses; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code section 65864 et seq. authorizes a city and a developer having a legal or equitable interest in real property to enter into a binding, long-term development agreement establishing certain development rights in the property; and WHEREAS, Municipal Code Chapter 18.460 Development Agreements authorizes the execution of development agreements and sets forth the required contents and form of those agreements; and
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2021, Authentic Concord Retail, LLC (“Applicant” or “Authentic”), submitted an Administrative Permit, Minor Exception, Design and Site Review, and Development Agreement applications to establish a cannabis storefront retail use at 1045 Galaxy Way Pass Road, APN 126-325-004 (“Property”), (herein collectively referred to as “Project”); and WHEREAS, on April 21, 2022, the Project was deemed complete by staff; and WHEREAS, the City and Applicant have reached mutual agreement on the terms of the Development Agreement to facilitate development of the Project subject to the conditions and requirements set forth therein, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Development Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2022, the Planning Commission continued the application to a date uncertain to give the applicant and staff time to address issues raised after the agenda was published; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after giving all public notices required by State Law and the Concord Municipal Code, held a duly noticed public hearing September 7, 2022 on the proposed Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, at such public hearing, the Planning Commission considered all oral and written information, testimony, and comments received during the public review process, including information received at the public hearing, the oral report from City staff, the written report from City staff dated September 7, 2022 materials, exhibits presented, and all other information that constitutes the record of proceedings on which the Planning Commission has based its decision that are maintained at the offices of the City of Concord Planning Division (collectively, “Planning Commission Information”); and
WHEREAS, on September 7, 2022, the Planning Commission, after consideration of all pertinent plans, documents, and testimony, voted 4-0 (AYES: Mizutani, Laub, Barbour, Mercurio) to adopt a Resolution No. 22-07PC Recommending the City Council Approve an Administrative Permit, Minor Exception, Design and Site Review, and Ordinance for a Development Agreement for a Cannabis Storefront Retail Use Located at 1045 Galaxy Way (PL21153 – AA, ME, DR, DA) for Authentic Concord, LLC (dba “STIIIZY”); (APN: 126-325-004), subject to the draft Conditions of Approval contained herein as Exhibit A (“Conditions of Approval”); and WHEREAS, the City Council, after giving all public notices required by State Law and the Concord Municipal Code, held a duly noticed public hearing on September 27, 2022 on the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, at such public hearing, the City Council also considered and adopted a Resolution Approving an Administrative Permit, Minor Exception, and, Design and Site Review, for a Cannabis Storefront and Delivery Retail Business at 1045 Galaxy Way, APN: 126-325-004 (PL21153 – AA, ME, DR, DA). Authentic Concord, LLC (DBA “STIIIZY”) (“Resolution 22-XX”); and
WHEREAS, at such public hearing, the City Council considered all oral and written information, testimony, and comments received during the public review process and at the public hearing, the oral report from City staff, the written report from City staff dated September 27, 2022 materials, exhibits presented, the Planning Commission Information, and all other information that constitutes the record of proceedings relating to the proposed Project, which are maintained at the offices of the City of Concord City Clerk (collectively, “City Council Information”), and declared their intent to approve and adopt the Ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. All of the facts set forth in the Recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.
Section 2. The City Council has reviewed, considered, and evaluated the City Council Information, all other pertinent plans, documents, and testimony prior to acting upon Ordinance.
Section 3. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council has based its recommendation are located in and may be obtained from the City of Concord Clerk’s Office, 1950 Parkside Drive, Concord 94519.
Section 4. CEQA. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively “CEQA”), the proposed Project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the “Common Sense Exemption”. The activity is covered by the common sense exemption in that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The August 12, 2022 Exemption Memorandum prepared by Raney Planning & Management Inc., which is attached to the September 27, 2022 City Council staff report and incorporated by reference herein, prepared demonstrates with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed project would have a significant impact upon the
environment. Therefore, the project can be considered exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3).Therefore, the proposed Project does not warrant further environmental review. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.
Section 5. Development Agreement.
a. The Development Agreement is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan. The cannabis retail storefront business is consistent with General Plan policies E-2.1.1, E-2.1.7, LU-9.1.3, LU-10.1.5, and LU6.1.2. The Project will foster entrepreneurship and innovation by providing a cannabis retail storefront in Concord; increasing the variety for retail goods; and providing employment generating businesses that place an emphasis on hiring Concord residents.
b. The Development Agreement is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practices. Storefront retail cannabis uses are allowed in the WMX zoning district with the approval of an Administrative Permit and competitive selection process. The proposed use will be occupying an existing building, which is in conformance with the regulations and standards for the zoning district. No known sensitive uses as defined in CMC Chapter 5.80 are located within 250 feet of the subject property. c. The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing in the immediate area nor be detrimental or injurious to property or persons in the general neighborhood or to the general welfare of the residents of the city as a whole. The Development Agreement, Conditional City Cannabis License, Administrative Permit, and Minor Exception contain conditions of approval, including a safety and security plan that will ensure the use will not impact surrounding businesses and properties. The Development Agreement contains commitments from Authentic Concord LLC codified through adoption of the agreement by the City Council to provide community benefits with the purpose of youth drug use prevention and education efforts, drug treatment and mental health programs, including programs providing supervised diversion from the criminal justice system to avoid recidivism, workforce development,
small business assistance, providing amenities for public use and enjoyment, including streetscape and sidewalk improvements and public art installations, event programming and other activation of public space, and improving quality of life and providing economic opportunities.
d. The Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values. The proposed business will be occupying an existing building. The Applicant will be making minor changes to the exterior of the building, including new glass storefront, new paint as necessary and signage, but no changes that would adversely affect the orderly development of property. The Applicant will also be making exterior improvements to the site, including new landscaping, bicycle racks, and trash enclosure. These improvements will help preserve property values for the area. e. The Development Agreement is consistent with California Government Code sections 65864 through 65869.5. The City has given the required notice of its intention to adopt the Development Agreement and has conducted public hearings thereon pursuant to Government Code Section 65867 and the Development Agreement Ordinance (CMC Chapter 18.460). The City has reviewed and evaluated this Agreement in accordance with the Development Agreement Laws and found that the provisions of this Agreement and its purposes are consistent with the Development Agreement Laws and the goals, policies, standards and land use designations specified in the General Plan.
Section 6. The City Council does hereby pass and adopt this Ordinance No. 22-xx and approves and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Development Agreement in form attached hereto as Exhibit A, with minor technical, non-substantive revisions that may be approved by the City Manager in consultation with the City Attorney, and (as more specifically set forth in the Development Agreement) further authorizes the City Manager or designee the authority to determine, review, and approve any “Minor Amendment” as set forth in the Development Agreement and subject to approval of the City Attorney. Upon execution of the Development Agreement by all parties, the
City Clerk is hereby directed to record the Development Agreement with the Contra Costa County Recorder’s Office.
Section 7. This Ordinance No. 22-XX shall become effective thirty (30) days following its passage and adoption. In the event a summary of said Ordinance is published in lieu of the entire Ordinance, a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to its adoption and within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, including the vote of the Councilmembers. Additionally, a summary prepared by the City Attorney’s Office shall be published once at least five (5) days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance and once within fifteen (15) days after its passage and adoption, including the vote of the Councilmembers, in the East Bay Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Concord.
Dominic Aliano
Mayor
ATTEST:
Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
(Seal)
Ordinance No. 22-xx was duly and regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord held on September 27, 2022, and was thereafter duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord on [October xx], 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers -
NOES: Councilmembers -
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers -
ABSENT: Councilmembers -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an ordinance duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Concord, California.
Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
Exhibit A: Development Agreement
Exhibit A to Attachment 2
JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m 920 First Street, Suite 202 Benicia, CA 94510 Tel: (707) 747-1231 TOM WILSON ARCHITECT, INC. 09-01-2021 NSE22
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
CONCORD, CA 94520 AUTHENTIC 1045 GALAXY WAY CONCORD, CA 94520 APN: 126-325-004-3 VICINITY MAP OWNER ARCHITECT PROJECT LOCATION DR0.1 COVER SHEET DR1.0 OVERALL SITE PLAN DR1.1 EXISTING SITE PLAN DR1.2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN DR1.3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAILS DR1.4 TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILS DR2.0 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN DR2.1 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN DR4.1 ROOF PLAN DR5.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DR5.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PH - 1 PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN L - 1A REVISED CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN L - 1 ORIGINAL LANDSCAPE SUBMITTAL SN - 1 SIGNAGE PLAN CITY OF CONCORD PLANNING DIVISION 1950 PARKSIDE DR., M/S 53 CONCORD, CA 94519 CONTACT: COLEMAN FRICK TEL: (925) 671-3281 www.cityofconcord.org TOM WILSON TWA ARCHITECTS 5055 BUSINESS CENTER DR. SUITE 108 / PMB 344 FAIRFIELD, CA 94534 TEL: (707) 747-1231 [email protected] SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED FOR DRAWING INDEX DR0.1 COVER SHEET SGI CONCORD, LLC 78 COMMERCIAL LANE LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 CONTACT: TAK SATIO PHONE: (415) 336-0374 DESIGN REVIEW, ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SEPTEMBER 2021 PL21153; DR, AP, DA ARTIST RENDERING - TWA ATTACHMENT 3 Received by Planning Jan. 28. 2022
260.48
N 32° 43' 55" W
82.77 N 32° 43' 55" W 565.14 N 57° 16' 05" 5 513.13 N 57° 16' 05" E 102.03 N 57° 16' 05" E 293.39
N 32° 43' 55" W
78.55 R = 50
211,266 S.F. (4.85 AC) EXISTING SRM STORAGE / WAREHOUSE (NOT A PART) PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING EXISTING SERVICE BUILDING (NOT A PART) (N) PARKING 30 TOTAL SPACES EXISTING SRM SERVICE MASTER RESTORATION SERVICE (NOT A PART) EXISTING PARKING: (91 STANDARD SPACES, 4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES - 95 TOTAL SPACES) EXISTING GALAXY OFFICE BUILDING EXISTING SERVICE PARKING (NOT A PART) EXISTING CONCORD HOLIDAY INN. GALAXY WAY DIAMOND BLVD.
(N) LANDSCAPE
(N) LANDSCAPE
(N) LANDSCAPE
EV CHARGING ONLY COMPACT EV CHARGING ONLY COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING VAN EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING (N) PARKING (NOT A PART) DR1.0 OVERALL SITE PLAN OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m 920 First Street, Suite 202 Benicia, CA 94510 Tel: (707) 747-1231 TOM WILSON ARCHITECT, INC. 09-01-2021 NSE22
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
CONCORD, CA 94520
NO PARKING EXISTING PARKING G A L A X Y W A Y EXISTING SERVICE PARKING (E) SERVICE BUILDING (NOT A PART) PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING (E) BUILDING (NOT A PART) (E) PARKING 38 TOTAL SPACES DR1.1 ENLARGED DEMOLITION SITE PLAN DEMOLITION SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m 920 First Street, Suite 202 Benicia, CA 94510 Tel: (707) 747-1231 TOM WILSON ARCHITECT, INC. 09-01-2021 NSE22
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
CONCORD, CA 94520 LEGEND (E) ACCESSIBLE PATH FROM PUBLIC SIDEWALK, FROM BUS STOP, AND FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS TO TENANT ENTRANCE REMOVED AND REPLACE (E) DAMAGED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. (N) SIDEWALK AREA TO COMPLY WITH 2019 CBC AND ADA REQUIREMENTS. REMOVED AND REPLACE (E) DRIVEWAYS PER CITY OF CONCORD STD. DETAIL S-14 (E) CATCH BASIN, SEE CIVIL PLANS GENERAL NOTES THE EXISTING DEVELOPED SITE FOR THIS BUILDING INCLUDES ALL SITE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AND HAS BEEN APPROVED UNDER A SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE EXISTING AND ARE NOT A PART OF THIS TENANT IMPROVEMENT PERMIT: · EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PATH FROM PUBLIC SIDEWALK AND FROM BUS STOP TO BUILDING ENTRANCE. · EXISTING SIGNAGE AT EACH DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO THE SITE INDICATING ACCESSIBILITY. · EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS CLOSE TO THE TENANT ENTRANCE. · EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PATH FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. SITE DATA APN: 126-325-004 PROPOSED SITE AREA: 211,266 S.F. (4.85 AC) GENERAL PLAN: WCMU (WEST CONCORD MIXED-USE) ZONING: WMX (WEST CONCORD MIXED-USE) BUILDING AREA 54,935 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE 26% LANDSCAPE AREA 10,122 S.F. EXISTING PARKING PROVIDED: 70 DEGREE (9'x21') = 24 SPACES TANDAM (9'x18') = 12 SPACES STANDARD ACCESSIBLE = 1 SPACES VAN ACCESSIBLE = 1 SPACES TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED = 38 SPACES REMOVED AND REPLACE (E) DAMAGED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. (N) SIDEWALK AREA TO COMPLY WITH 2019 CBC AND ADA REQUIREMENTS. REMOVED AND REPLACE (E) DRIVEWAYS PER CITY OF CONCORD STD. DETAIL S-14 SHEET NOTES Page 116 of 607
EV CHARGING ONLY COMPACT EV CHARGING ONLY COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING VAN EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING 4 6 20 EXISTING PARKING G A L A X Y W A Y(N) SERVICE PARKING (NOT A PART) (E) SERVICE BUILDING (NOT A PART) PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING (E) BUILDING (NOT A PART) (N) PARKING 30 TOTAL SPACES DR1.2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m 920 First Street, Suite 202 Benicia, CA 94510 Tel: (707) 747-1231 TOM WILSON ARCHITECT, INC. 09-01-2021 NSE22
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
CONCORD, CA 94520 LEGEND 15'-0" VISION TRIANGLE PUBLIC SIDEWALK (N) LANDSCAPE, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS REMOVED AND REPLACE (E) DAMAGED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. (N) SIDEWALK AREA TO COMPLY WITH 2019 CBC AND ADA REQUIREMENTS. REMOVED AND REPLACE (E) DRIVEWAYS PER CITY OF CONCORD STD. DETAIL S-14 GENERAL NOTES THE EXISTING DEVELOPED SITE FOR THIS BUILDING INCLUDES ALL SITE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AND HAS BEEN APPROVED UNDER A SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE EXISTING AND ARE NOT A PART OF THIS TENANT IMPROVEMENT PERMIT: · EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PATH FROM PUBLIC SIDEWALK AND FROM BUS STOP TO BUILDING ENTRANCE. · EXISTING SIGNAGE AT EACH DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO THE SITE INDICATING ACCESSIBILITY. · EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS CLOSE TO THE TENANT ENTRANCE. · EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PATH FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. SITE DATA APN: 126-325-004 PROPOSED SITE AREA: 211,266 S.F. (4.85 AC) GENERAL PLAN: WCMU (WEST CONCORD MIXED-USE) ZONING: WMX (WEST CONCORD MIXED-USE) BUILDING AREA 54,935 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE 26% LANDSCAPE AREA 9,998 S.F. PARKING REQUIRED (PER CMC TABLE 18.160.040): PROPOSED RETAIL BLDG. (1 SPACE/250 SF G.F.A., 5,323 S.F./250 S.F. = 21) TOTAL SPACES REQ'D = 21 SPACES EXCESSIVE PARKING ALLOWED = 9 SPACES PER CMC 18.160.040.D.1 21 REQ.X10% = 2.1 = 2 SPACES PER CMC 18.160.040.D.3 EV CHARGING SPACES = 7 SPACES TOTAL SPACES ALLOWED = 30 SPACES REMOVED AND REPLACE (E) DAMAGED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. (N) SIDEWALK AREA TO COMPLY WITH 2019 CBC AND ADA REQUIREMENTS. REMOVED AND REPLACE (E) DRIVEWAYS PER CITY OF CONCORD STD. DETAIL S-14 SHEET NOTES PARKING PROVIDED: 60 DEGREE (9'x21') = 15 SPACES STANDARD (9'x18') = 4 SPACES COMPACT (8'x16') = 2 SPACES PARALLEL (9'x23')= 0 SPACES EV CHARGING = 7 SPACES STANDARD ACCESSIBLE = 1 SPACES VAN ACCESSIBLE = 1 SPACES TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED = 30 SPACES BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED PER CMC 18.160.120 SHORT TERM 5% OF REQ'D SPACES X 22 SPACES = 1.1 = 2 SPACES LONG TERM 10% OF REQ'D SPACES X 22 SPACES = 2.2 = 2 SPACES SHORT TERM PROVIDED: 2 SPACES LONG TERM PROVIDED: 2 SPACES ACCESSIBLE PATH FROM PUBLIC SIDEWALK, FROM BUS STOP, AND FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS TO TENANT ENTRANCE AND TRASH ENCLOSURE (E) CATCH BASIN, SEE CIVIL PLANS (E) FIRE WATER (E) 2" DOMESTIC WATER (E) STORM DRAIN LINES (E) SANITARY SEWER LINES
DR1.3 SITE DETAILS DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" (TRUNCATED DOMES) NO PARKING MARKINGS SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 7 4 1 8 5 2 12 9 6 1110 3 JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m 920 First Street, Suite 202 Benicia, CA 94510 Tel: (707) 747-1231 TOM WILSON ARCHITECT, INC. 09-01-2021 NSE22
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
CONCORD, CA 94520 ACCESSIBLE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE ··· ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL SIGNS SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" PARKING ONLY MINIMUM FINE $250 PARKING ONLY MINIMUM FINE $250 VAN ACCESSIBLE VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL STANDARD ACCESSIBLE STALL SIGN POLE SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" RESTRICTED PARKING SIGN SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" UNAUTHORIZED VEHICLES PARKED IN DESIGNATED ACCESSIBLE SPACES NOT DISPLAYING DISTINGUISHING PLACARDS OR SPECIAL LICENSE PLATES ISSUED FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES WILL BE TOWED AWAY AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE. TOWED VEHICLES MAY BE RECLAIMED AT ___________________ OR BY TELEPHONING ___________________ CBC 11B-502.8 SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY AT STALL SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" CURB RAMP SCALE: AS NOTED WHEEL STOP SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" SIDE ELEVATION PLAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" NO PARKING VAN NOT USED Page 118 of 607 DR1.4 SITE DETAILS 8 5 12 9 6 1110 GATE JAMB DETAILS SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" SECTION ELEVATION GATE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" TUBE STEEL TO CMU CONNECTION SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" PLAN ELEVATION 3 JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m 920 First Street, Suite 202 Benicia, CA 94510 Tel: (707) 747-1231 TOM WILSON ARCHITECT, INC. 09-01-2021 NSE22
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
CONCORD, CA 94520 FIXED BOLLARD SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" TRASH & RECYCLING ENCLOSURE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION ROOF PLAN REAR ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" BICYCLE RACK SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" CONCRETE APRON EDGE SCALE: 1-1/2" = 1'-0" Page 119 of 607 (E) OFFICE
(E) HALL
(E) LOBBY
(E) MEN (E) WOMEN
(E) CLO. (E) SHOWROOM (E) OFFICE (E) OFFICE
(E) OFFICE
(E) UTILITY
(E) BREAK AREA DR2.0 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m 920 First Street, Suite 202 Benicia, CA 94510 Tel: (707) 747-1231 TOM WILSON ARCHITECT, INC. 09-01-2021 NSE22
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
CONCORD, CA 94520 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Page 120 of 607 47'-0 1/2" 83'-4 1/2" ± 11'-0" 12'-8" 12'-8"
2'-10"
10'-0" 2'-0" 9'-0" 1'-2" 39'-6" 3'-0" 5'-6"
± 5'-3"
1'-4" 23'-0" 2'-10"
65'-10"
± 8" ± 12'-4" ± 6'-10" ± 28'-6" ± 7'-6" 86'-8" 10'-0" 3'-0" 12'-0" 5'-0" 12'-0" 5'-0" 12'-0" 12'-6" 12'-4" 65'-10"
12'-4" 7'-6" 6'-6" 11'-8" 6'-6" 18'-6"
25'-11" ± 12'-9" 16'-7" 6'-0" 13'-0" 10'-6"
± 4'-6"
1'-6"
CLR. 1'-0" NEW WALL CLR. NEW WALL NEW WALL NEW WALL NEW WALL SALES COUNTER NEW ACCESSIBLE ENTRY / EXIT (E) EXIT TO REMAIN (E) EXIT TO REMAIN (E) EXIT TO REMAIN NEW WALL NEW WALL NEW WALL NEW WALL NEW WALL (E) WALL TO REMAIN (E) WALL TO REMAIN (E) WALL TO REMAIN (E) STOREFRONT TO REMAIN NEW ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM NEW ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM (E) STOREFRONT TO REMAIN (E) WALL TO REMAIN (E) WALL TO REMAIN (E) INTERIOR GLASS WALL TO REMAIN (N) DOUBLE WALL MOUNTED BIKE RACKS (E) STOREFRONT TO REMAIN NEW WALL NEW RETAIL 2,674 S.F. (E) BREAK ROOM 223 S.F. (E) MEN 167 S.F. NEW SECURITY OFFICE 174 S.F.ENTRANCE EMERGENCY EXIT EXIT NEW SECURE INVENTORY 600 S.F. NEW CONFERENCE ROOM 232 S.F. (E) WOMEN 199 S.F. (E) HALL 269 S.F. (E) OFFICE 144 S.F. (E) UTILITY 119 S.F. (E) LOBBY 522 S.F. (E) ROOF OVER PATIO NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE DR2.1 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m 920 First Street, Suite 202 Benicia, CA 94510 Tel: (707) 747-1231 TOM WILSON ARCHITECT, INC. 09-01-2021 NSE22
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
CONCORD, CA 94520 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 5,323 S.F.
EXISTING CLAY TILE ROOF TO REMAIN EXISTING CRICKET TO REMAIN EXISTING BUILT-UP ROOFING SYSTEM TO REMAIN EXISTING GUTTER TO REMAIN EXISTING WALK PADS TO REMAIN EXISTING LOUVERED ATTIC VENT TO REMAIN EXISTING ROOF ACCESS HATCH TO REMAIN REPLACE EXISTING MECHANICAL UNIT WITH NEW MECHANICAL UNIT EXISTING PARAPET TO REMAIN EXISTING ROOF DRAIN AND OVERFLOW TO REMAIN EXISTING ROOF DRAIN AND OVERFLOW TO REMAIN EXISTING CRICKET TO REMAIN EXISTING GUTTER TO REMAIN EXISTING CLAY TILE ROOF TO REMAIN EXISTING CLAY TILE ROOF TO REMAIN EXISTING PARAPET TO REMAIN EXISTING PARAPET TO REMAIN DR4.1 ROOF PLAN JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m 920 First Street, Suite 202 Benicia, CA 94510 Tel: (707) 747-1231 TOM WILSON ARCHITECT, INC. 09-01-2021 NSE22
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
CONCORD, CA 94520 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Page 122 of 607
G A L A X Y W A Y G A L A X Y W A Y (E) BUILDING (NOT A PART) PROJECT PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE (E) 6' WALK TO REMAIN (E) DRIVEWAY TO REMAIN NEW SCREEN AT EQUIPMENT (E) SIGN TO REMAIN (E) BUILDING (NOT A PART) REMOVE (E) OVERHANG (E) DRIVEWAY REMOVE PORTION OF CURB (E) BUILDING (NOT A PART) PROJECT PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE (E) 6' WALK TO REMAIN (E) DRIVEWAY TO REMAIN NEW SCREEN AT EQUIPMENT (E) 12" WATER MAIN (E) BUILDING (NOT A PART)(E) DRIVEWAY (E) WATER METER (E) SIGN TO REMAIN PROPERTY LINE NO PARKING NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE, SEE DR 1.3 NO PARKING NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE, SEE DR 1.3 L-1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN AUTHENTIC 1045 GALAXY WAY
CONCORD, CA 94520 JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" Page 125 of 607
G A L A X Y W A Y
(E) DRIVEWAY EV CHARGING ONLY COMPACT EV CHARGING ONLY COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING VAN EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING G A L A X Y W A Y (E) BUILDING (NOT A PART) PROJECT PROPERTY LINE (E) 6' WALK TO REMAIN (E) DRIVEWAY TO REMAIN (E) SIGN TO REMAIN (E) BUILDING (NOT A PART) REMOVE (E) OVERHANG (E) DRIVEWAYNO PARKING L-1A PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY
CONCORD, CA 94520 JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" Page 126 of 607 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 AMH: 18 AMH: 18 AMH: 18 AMH: 18 AMH: 18 AMH: 18 AMH: 18 AMH: 18 AMH: 18 AMH: 18 AMH: 18 AMH: 18 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 FMH: 15 BMH: 18 BMH: 18 4.4 4.6 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.9 4.1 4.3 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.7 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.6 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.2 4.0 3.7 3.1 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.5 4.1 4.1 3.3 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.6 5.0 5.5 5.8 6.2 5.6 5.2 4.9 4.4 4.0 3.6 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.6 4.5 4.7 3.4 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.4 5.4 6.3 5.5 5.1 4.8 4.3 3.8 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.2 5.0 5.4 3.6 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.9 4.3 4.8 5.1 5.6 5.1 5.6 5.0 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.7 6.0 6.2 3.8 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.9 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.1 5.1 5.0 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.5 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.7 3.8 6.1 6.4 3.9 3.1 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.4 3.8 4.1 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.0 3.6 3.3 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 3.6 5.8 6.4 3.9 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.4 5.7 6.2 3.8 2.9 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 3.5 5.8 6.3 3.7 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 3.6 5.9 6.0 3.5 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.0 3.2 5.3 5.5 3.1 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.5 4.0 4.3 2.6 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7 3.0 3.3 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.2 2.1 2.4 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 2.1 2.6 3.2 3.8 4.3 4.5 5.3 5.8 6.1 6.0 5.6 5.5 5.5 5.1 4.8 4.6 2.3 2.9 3.6 4.3 5.2 5.9 7.2 7.3 7.2 7.9 7.0 6.6 6.3 5.9 5.5 5.3 2.4 3.1 3.8 4.7 5.7 6.7 8.2 11.8 11.2 10.2 9.4 9.2 9.1 9.2 9.5 10.3 11.3 12.2 12.5 11.7 10.5 9.3 8.8 8.5 8.4 8.7 9.0 9.8 10.8 11.9 12.3 11.6 10.5 9.4 8.7 8.5 8.3 8.6 9.0 9.5 10.5 11.7 12.6 12.5 11.5 10.4 9.6 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.8 10.7 11.7 12.4 11.9 10.8 9.4 8.3 7.9 7.6 7.5 7.6 8.0 8.2 9.0 9.1 7.9 7.4 6.9 6.3 5.9 5.8 2.3 2.9 3.6 4.6 5.7 6.9 8.4 11.1 10.2 9.3 9.1 9.1 9.2 9.7 10.5 11.3 12.1 12.2 11.7 10.7 9.4 8.9 8.5 8.4 8.8 9.3 10.1 11.1 11.9 12.1 11.7 10.8 9.6 9.0 8.6 8.3 8.8 9.2 9.8 10.9 11.7 12.4 12.4 11.6 10.5 9.7 9.4 9.5 9.6 10.0 10.9 11.7 12.0 11.8 10.9 9.8 8.6 7.9 7.5 7.3 7.6 8.0 8.6 9.4 10.3 9.4 8.1 7.6 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.1 2.1 2.7 3.5 4.5 5.6 6.7 7.7 9.9 9.4 8.9 8.7 8.7 8.8 9.2 9.7 10.3 10.7 10.9 10.5 10.0 9.1 8.5 8.1 8.0 8.4 8.9 9.5 10.3 10.7 10.9 10.7 10.3 9.4 8.7 8.3 8.1 8.4 8.9 9.5 10.2 10.7 11.1 11.0 10.7 9.9 9.4 9.1 9.0 9.1 9.5 10.0 10.5 10.7 10.4 10.0 9.2 8.5 7.6 7.1 6.9 7.2 7.6 8.3 8.9 9.3 8.9 8.1 7.4 6.9 6.2 5.9 5.9 2.0 2.5 3.3 4.2 5.1 6.0 6.6 7.3 7.9 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.5 8.9 9.1 9.1 9.0 8.7 8.3 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.8 8.1 8.5 9.0 9.2 9.3 9.3 9.1 8.8 8.3 8.0 7.9 8.0 8.3 8.7 9.0 9.3 9.4 9.4 9.3 8.9 8.7 8.6 8.5 8.4 8.5 8.7 8.9 9.0 8.9 8.7 8.2 7.8 7.2 6.7 6.5 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.8 8.0 8.0 7.7 7.2 6.6 6.0 5.6 5.6 1.9 2.3 3.0 3.8 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.9 6.3 6.6 6.8 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.1 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.2 7.5 7.6 7.8 7.9 7.9 8.0 8.0 7.8 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.6 7.8 7.9 7.9 8.0 7.9 8.0 8.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.2 6.9 6.7 6.2 6.1 6.2 6.5 6.7 6.9 6.9 6.9 7.2 7.1 6.8 6.4 5.7 5.3 5.4 1.7 2.1 2.6 3.4 3.9 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.1 5.3 5.6 6.0 6.2 6.3 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 7.0 7.2 7.3 7.1 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.8 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 6.7 6.6 6.3 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.0 5.7 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.1 5.3 5.1 5.2 1.5 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.5 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.4 5.1 5.0 5.0 5.1 5.3 5.6 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.7 5.5 5.6 5.8 5.9 6.2 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.3 6.0 5.9 5.8 5.8 6.0 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.5 6.4 5.9 5.4 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.3 5.6 5.8 6.0 5.9 5.8 5.9 6.0 5.9 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.1 6.2 6.1 5.7 5.2 5.1 5.1 5.5 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.6 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.8 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.0 4.7 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.6 4.9 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.0 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.7 6.1 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.3 6.2 5.9 5.6 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.7 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.1 5.3 4.9 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.9 5.2 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.0 6.0 5.9 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.8 5.5 5.2 4.9 5.0 5.5 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.7 4.0 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.9 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 6.0 5.9 5.9 5.7 5.5 5.3 5.1 5.0 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 5.6 5.9 5.9 5.1 4.7 3.9 4.0 4.3 4.6 5.0 5.4 5.7 5.8 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.7 6.9 7.3 7.7 7.7 7.2 6.6 6.1 5.4 5.0 4.8 4.9 5.3 6.0 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.5 4.7 4.9 5.1 5.4 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.9 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.9 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 4.9 4.7 3.6 3.9 4.3 5.2 6.0 7.0 7.7 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.1 8.6 8.8 8.5 7.4 6.6 5.9 5.1 4.7 4.4 4.6 4.9 5.5 6.4 7.1 7.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.9 5.2 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.5 5.2 5.0 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.2 3.9 4.3 4.8 5.6 6.2 6.4 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.5 4.8 5.1 5.3 5.5 5.4 5.3 5.1 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.4 3.7 4.2 4.8 5.3 5.4 3.5 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.7 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.4 4.1 3.8 2.9 3.1 3.5 4.3 4.6 4.4 5.9 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.6 6.4 6.3 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.6 4.8 4.4 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.0 5.4 5.7 5.7 5.3 5.0 4.7 4.4 4.1 2.5 2.6 3.5 3.8 4.0 3.7 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.6 7.1 7.6 7.3 6.9 6.5 6.8 6.9 6.3 5.1 3.1 3.4 3.8 4.2 4.7 5.2 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.1 4.7 4.3 4.0 2.4 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.3 4.8 3.7 3.4 3.2 3.2 2.9 6.2 4.0 3.4 3.2 2.8 2.4 7.2 4.3 3.6 7.8 5.2 3.5 10.0 5.4 3.5 10.0 5.6 3.2 9.4 4.9 3.0 6.9 4.2 2.5 5.8 3.0 2.2 4.2 2.2 1.5 2.9 1.6 1.2 1.8 1.2 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.6 6.0 6.5 5.1 4.6 3.1 3.4 3.9 4.7 5.6 7.0 8.2 8.9 8.9 8.9 9.0 8.6 7.8 7.1 6.8 6.5 6.2 5.6 4.9 4.5 4.3 4.1 3.9 4.5 6.1 6.9 5.3 4.7 2.1 1.8 2.7 3.2 3.8 4.8 5.6 6.0 5.8 5.9 6.2 6.0 5.5 5.2 5.5 4.8 5.0 4.8 4.2 3.9 3.6 3.3 3.3 4.2 6.2 7.4 5.6 4.9 1.9 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 4.9 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.5 3.7 2.9 2.4 2.5 2.6 4.1 6.2 7.4 5.6 4.3 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.6 7.0 5.4 3.7 1.4 2.1 3.7 5.1 6.7 5.4 3.5 2.0 3.5 4.5 6.6 5.7 3.5 6.0 3.3 4.1 6.4 6.1 3.7 4.9 7.5 3.7 6.0 6.0 3.6 3.6 5.5 7.9 3.3 5.2 5.1 3.0 3.3 7.8 2.9 4.2 3.8 2.2 3.5 9.6 2.6 3.5 3.4 1.9 2.9 7.5 2.4 3.0 2.9 1.6 3.0 4.8 7.3 2.2 3.3 3.1 1.7 3.9 6.4 1.8 2.2 3.5 3.5 1.9 0.8 4.7 1.8 2.2 4.1 4.0 2.4 0.4 0.6 1.8 2.4 4.7 5.0 2.9 0.2 0.3 1.6 2.2 4.6 5.0 2.9 0.1 0.2 EV CHARGING ONLY COMPACT EV CHARGING ONLY COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING VAN EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING EV CHARGING ONLY NO PARKING JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m 920 First Street, Suite 202 Benicia, CA 94510 Tel: (707) 747-1231 TOM WILSON ARCHITECT, INC. 09-01-2021 NSE22
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
CONCORD, CA 94520 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Fixture Type Manufacturer and Part Number LLF Lumens Watts 14 A NLS Lighting VSS-1-T4-32L-1-40K-UNV 0.903 11766 106 2 B NLS Lighting VSS-1-T5-32L-1-40K-UNV 0.903 12190 106 14 F NLS Lighting FLW-1-T4-16L-7-40K 0.903 3132 36 MOUNTING HEIGHT 18'-0" A.F.G. 18'-0" A.F.G. 15'-0" A.F.G. NOTES: 1. The luminaire fixture types and part numbers included on the schedule above are for photometric purposes only and may need to be revised for real world conditions. Please refer to the manufacturer specification sheets and make sure to confirm voltages, finishes, mounting options, dimming and control options, accessories, etc. before specifying and/or ordering the fixtures. 2. LLF = Light Loss Factor = Lamp Lumen Depreciation (LLD) x Lamp Dirt Depreciation (LDD) = 0.95 x 0.95 = 0.90
3. The "MH" tag beneath the fixture type designations shown in plan view indicates fixture mounting height AFF (above finished floor).
Illuminance Calculation Summary
Calculation Grid Description Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min LANDSCAPE AREA Fc 2.97 6.4 1.0 2.97 6.40 PARKING LOT Fc 6.10 12.6 0.3 20.33 42.00 PROPOSED RETAIL BLDG EXTERIOR Fc 4.34 9.6 0.1 43.40 96.00 DRIVE AISLE Fc 5.00 10.0 0.3 16.67 33.33 LOADING SPACE Fc 4.48 7.4 2.4 1.87 3.08 PATH TO STREET Fc 6.50 9.0 3.9 1.67 2.31 PH-1 PHOTOMETRIC NOTES: PLAN 1. The calculation grid is at 0'-0" AFG unless otherwise noted.
SN-1 SIGNAGE JOB NO.: REV. NO. REV. DATE DATE: w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m 920 First Street, Suite 202 Benicia, CA 94510 Tel: (707) 747-1231 TOM WILSON ARCHITECT, INC. 09-01-2021 NSE22
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
CONCORD, CA 94520
100 Pringle Avenue | Suite 600 | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | (925) 930-7100 | Fax (925) 933-7090 www.fehrandpeers.com
Memorandum
Date: April 25, 2022
To: Winnie Chung, City of Concord
From: Marta Polovin and Ryan McClain, Fehr & Peers
Subject: Authentic Concord, VMT and Local Transportation Assessment WC21-3866
This technical memorandum documents the results of the local transportation analysis prepared for the proposed Authentic Cannabis Dispensary Project in Concord, California.
The proposed Project site is located at 1045 Galaxy Way, in Concord, California, as shown on Figure 1. The Project seeks to build out an existing 5,323 square foot building for use as a marijuana dispensary. Vehicular site access will be provided via two driveways along Galaxy Way.
The project site plan is shown on Figure 2. This study’s purpose is to provide an initial screening for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and evaluate the potential effects of the development of the Project on the nearby area roadway levels of service (LOS) and review collision trends adjacent to the Project site.
VMTScreeningAssessment
With the passage of Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), the use of criteria such as auto delay, level of service, and similar measures of vehicle capacity of traffic congestion as the basis for determining significant impacts as part of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance was eliminated. SB 743 mandates the use of VMT in the evaluation and assessment of significant transportation impacts. In July 2020, Concord adopted VMT-based analysis methods which includes VMT metrics, thresholds, and screening criteria for evaluating a project’s VMT impact.
Based on the City thresholds and screening criteria, a project can be screened out from a formal VMT analysis if certain criteria are met that would signify that a project would be presumed to result in a less-than-significant CEQA Transportation section impact with respect to VMT. A project’s impact on VMT is considered less-than-significant and should not require further VMT ATTACHMENT 4
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
analysis if the project meets at least one of the following criteria (based on the City of Concord’s thresholds adopted July 2020):
Retail
• Locally Serving1 and fewer than 30,000 square feet
• Located in a Transit Priority Area (TPA)2 and fewer than 50,000 square feet The total square footage of the proposed project is 5,323 square feet, which is less than the 30,000 square foot threshold for a retail use not located in a TPA. Additionally, the project may be considered locally serving based on the proximity of nearby dispensaries and the context of the Project. Velvet Cannabis Dispensary, located on 4808 Sunrise Drive, Martinez, California is roughly
3.1 miles away, and the retail portion is expected to serve nearby residents. Therefore, the proposed retail portion of the project satisfies the City-established screening criteria for a locallyserving retail use and may be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact without further analysis.
LocalTransportationAnalysis
The following discusses our analysis methods and assumptions for the assessment.
Analysis Locations and Scenarios
Potential project violations of the City’s established LOS policies were determined by measuring the effect project traffic would have on intersections in the vicinity of the project site during the weekday evening (4:00 to 6:00 PM) and Saturday (10:00 AM to 2:00 PM) peak periods. Based on the expected level of Project trip generation, the trip distribution, and City of Concord’s thresholds, the following intersections were selected for study, as shown on Figure 1:
1. Concord Avenue/Diamond Boulevard
2. Concord Avenue/Meridian Park Boulevard
3. Concord Avenue/Galaxy Way
4. Concord Avenue/Commerce Avenue/SR-242 Ramp
5. Concord Avenue/Market Street/SR-242 Ramp
1 Locally serving uses are generally fewer than 30,000 square feet and tend to serve the immediate community surrounding the project site, such as a coffee shop, drycleaners, convenience markets, and tutoring centers. If there are similar uses within a three-mile radius, the use may also be locally serving.
The final determination of whether a particular project is a local serving use shall rest with the City.
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
6. Diamond Boulevard/Burnett Avenue
7. Diamond Boulevard/Galaxy Way
8. Diamond Boulevard/The Veranda/Seafood City Driveway
9. Diamond Boulevard/Willow Way
10. Diamond Boulevard/The Willows/Hilton Concord Driveway
11. Willow Pass Road/I-680 Northbound Ramps
12. Willow Pass Road/Diamond Boulevard
13. Willow Pass Road/Franquette Avenue
14. Willow Pass Road/Market Street
Operations of signalized intersections were evaluated using the method from Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual 6th and 2000 Edition methods. The following scenarios were evaluated:
• Existing – Based on existing traffic counts collected at the above intersections when area schools were in normal session.
• Existing with Project – Existing traffic counts plus traffic expected to be generated by the proposed Project.
Martinez
Park Reserve
CONCORD
MARTINEZ
PLEASANT HILL
Contra Costa Blvd
Cowell Rd
ChilpancingoPkwy
Golf Club Rd
Muir Rd
Pacheco Blvd
Clayton Rd
Concord Blvd
Willow Pass Rd
E Olivera Rd
Galindo St
Concord Ave
East St
Port Chicago Hwy
Meadow Ln
Detroit Ave
Willow Pass Rd
Alhambra Ave
Paso Nogal Rd
Morello Ave
Ellinwood Dr
Grant St
Taylor Blvd
Solano Way
Marsh Dr
Arnold Dr
Salvio St
Paso Nogal
Market St
Center Ave
Monument Blvd
Diamond Blvd
Meridian Park Blvd
John Glenn Dr
Burnett Ave
·242
·4
%&680
·242
%&680
Buchanan
Field Airport
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
Project Site Vicinity and Study Locations
Figure 1
WC21-3866_1_StudyArea
Project Site # Study Intersection
260.48
• •• • ••• • ••• • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
82.77 • •• • ••• • ••• • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 565.14
• •• • ••• • ••• • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
513.13
• •• • ••• • ••• • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
102.03
• •• • ••• • ••• • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
293.39
• •• • ••• • ••• • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
78.55 R = 50
211,266 S.F. (4.85 AC)
EXISTING SRM STORAGE / WAREHOUSE
(NOT A PART)
PROPOSED
RETAIL
BUILDING
EXISTING
SERVICE
BUILDING
(NOT A PART)
(N) PARKING
30 TOTAL SPACES
EXISTING
SRM SERVICE MASTER
RESTORATION SERVICE
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING PARKING:
(91 STANDARD SPACES,
4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES - 95 TOTAL SPACES)
EXISTING GALAXY
OFFICE BUILDING
EXISTING SERVICE PARKING
(NOT A PART)
EXISTING CONCORD HOLIDAY INN.
GALAXY WAY
DIAMOND BLVD.
(N) LANDSCAPE
(N) LANDSCAPE
(N) LANDSCAPE
EV
CHARGING
ONLY
COMPACT EV
CHARGING
ONLY
COMPACT
COMPACT
COMPACT
EV
CHARGING
ONLY
EV
CHARGING
ONLY
NO
PARKING VAN
EV
CHARGING
ONLY
EV
CHARGING
ONLY
NO
PARKING
EV
CHARGING
ONLY
NO
PARKING
(N) PARKING
(NOT A PART)
DR1.
OVERALL
SITE PLAN
OVERALL SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
JOB NO.:
REV. NO. REV. D
DATE:
w w w . t w - a r c h i t e c t s
920 First Street, Suite 202
Benicia, CA 94510
Tel: (707) 747-1231
TOM WILSON ARCHITECT
09-01-
NSE
AUTHENTIC
1045 GALAXY WAY,
Project Site Plan
Figure 2
WC21-3866_2_SitePlan
Site Plan Source: Tom Wilson Architect, Inc., 01/27/2022
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Analysis Methods
The operations of roadway facilities are described with the term “level of service” (LOS). LOS is a qualitative description of traffic flow from a vehicle driver’s perspective based on factors such as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels of service are defined ranging from LOS A (free-flow conditions) to LOS F (over-capacity conditions). LOS E corresponds to operations “at capacity.” When volumes exceed capacity, stop-and-go conditions result, and operations are designated LOS F.
Signalized Intersections
Traffic conditions at signalized intersections were evaluated using methods developed by the Transportation Research Board (TRB), as documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM 6th) for vehicles. The HCM method calculates control delay at an intersection based on inputs such as traffic volumes, lane geometry, signal phasing and timing, pedestrian crossing times, and peak hour factors. Control delay is defined as the delay directly associated with the traffic control device (i.e., a stop sign or a traffic signal) and specifically includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Due to some limitations with the HCM 6th Edition methodology, some intersections were evaluated using the HCM 2000 methodology. Specifically, the study intersection of Market Street at Willow Pass Road (Intersection 14) was evaluated using HCM 2000 methodology, as the 6th Edition does not include a method for the evaluation of 5-legged intersections. The relationship between LOS and control delay is summarized in Table 1.
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Table 1: Signalized Intersection LOS Criteria
Level of
Service Description Delay in Seconds
A
Progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay.
< 10.0
B Progression is good, cycle lengths are short, or both. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay.
> 10.0 to
20.0 C
Higher congestion may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both.
Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping.
> 20.0 to
35.0 D
The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines.
Individual cycle failures are noticeable.
> 35.0 to
55.0 E
This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. > 55.0 to
80.0 F
This level is considered unacceptable with oversaturation, which is when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. This level may also occur at high V/C ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be contributing factors to such delay levels. > 80.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (Transportation Research Board).
Regulatory Setting and LOS Policies
Intersection LOS has been evaluated in this study for General Plan compliance and to identify potential transportation improvements that could be implemented as part of the Project to improve the overall operations of the transportation system for all modes. The City of Concord 2030 General Plan sets the LOS benchmark at LOS E for streets within the Downtown, or within one-half mile of a BART station and along major transit routes. All other locations have a LOS benchmark of D.
The Project could have a noticeable detrimental effect on local and regional travel if it would cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, or delay and congestion at intersections), or change the condition of an existing street (e.g., street closures, changing direction of travel) in a manner that would substantially change access or traffic load and capacity of the street system. Criteria were developed based on LOS policies contained within the City of Concord General Plan, Transportation Impact Guidelines and previously used by the City of Concord as intersection thresholds of significance.
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
If necessary, recommendations will be designed to enhance mobility for all travel modes, including transit vehicles, without degrading or precluding the provision of planned bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities. Intersection or roadway improvements may be recommended under the following circumstances for intersections:
Signalized Intersections
1. For intersections not downtown or within a one-half mile radius of BART, project-related traffic causes the LOS rating to deteriorate from LOS D (55-seconds) or better to LOS E or F.
2. For intersections downtown, within a one-half mile radius of BART, or along a major transit route, project-related traffic causes the LOS rating to deteriorate from LOS E (80- seconds) or better to LOS F.
3. For intersections already operating at an unacceptable LOS without the project it is considered a deficiency if the project increases the average intersection delay by five or more seconds.
Vehicle Queues
1. Addition of project traffic causes 95th percentile vehicle queues to exceed the existing or planned length of a turn pocket, or where a queue exceeds the available storage without the project, project traffic increases the queue by 50-feet or more.
ExistingConditions
This section describes the transportation facilities in the study area, including the surrounding roadway network, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities in the Project’s vicinity. Existing intersection operations are also described.
Existing Transportation System
Regional Roadways
Interstate 680 (I-680) is a major north-south freeway that extends from San Jose to Fairfield, passing through the Counties of Santa Clara, Alameda, Contra Costa, and Solano. I-680 is a designated route of regional significance by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA).
Routes of regional significance are roadways that connect two or more subareas of Contra Costa, cross County boundaries, carry significant through traffic, and/or provide access to a regional highway or transit facility. The facility is west of the study area, with three general purpose lanes and one carpool lane in each direction.
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
State Route 242 (SR-242) is a north-south freeway that orients northeast-southwest through Concord, connecting to SR-4 in the north and I-680 in the south. It is also defined as a Route of Regional Significance by the CCTA. Within the study area, the facility is a six-lane freeway with a partial interchange at Concord Avenue.
Willow Pass Road is an east-west roadway with a northeast/southwest orientation. The Concord General Plan classifies Willow Pass Road as a regional roadway. It has three travel lanes in each direction and sidewalks on both sides of the road within the study area. The posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour (mph). The level of service standard on Willow Pass Road is LOS E as it is a transit route.
Local Roadways
Diamond Boulevard is a north-south roadway east of the project site with a northwest/southeast orientation. The Concord General Plan classifies this roadway as a community street. It has two travel lanes in each direction with a dividing center median. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. The LOS standard on Diamond Boulevard is LOS E as it is a transit route.
Concord Avenue is an east-west roadway north of the project. The Concord General Plan classifies this roadway as a community street and as a downtown street (past Fremont Street). It has 3 travel lanes in each direction with a dividing center median. Sidewalks are generally provided on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 40 mph. The LOS standard on Concord Avenue is LOS E as it is a transit route.
Transit Service
Transit service in the area is provided by County Connection with transit stops located within 0.5 miles of the Project site. There is a stop located less than 200 feet southwest of the Project, UFCW/Employers Plaza, on Galaxy Way (west of the westernmost Project driveway), which provides eastbound travel for route 91X. Additional stops exist along Diamond Boulevard, which provide generally eastbound and westbound travel for routes 19, 320 and 91X. There are stops located east of the Project near the Galaxy Way and Meridian Park Boulevard intersection, also providing eastbound and westbound travel for routes 19 and 91X. Route 19 connects the study area to the Concord BART Station and Martinez Amtrak Station on weekdays with 90-minute headways from 7:00 AM to 7:30 PM Route 91X (Commuter Express) connects the study area to the Concord BART Station and UFCW/Employers Plaza on weekdays with 30-minute headways from 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM and from 3:30 PM to 6:00 PM. Route 320 connects the study area to the Concord BART Station and Diablo Valley College on weekends with 30 minute headways from 10:00 AM to 7:00 PM.
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Bicycle Facilities
There are no bike facilities located on Galaxy Way, west of Diamond Boulevard. There is an eastbound and westbound Class 2 bike lane on Galaxy Way, between Diamond Boulevard and Meridian Park Boulevard (the eastbound bike lane continues shortly after Meridian Park Boulevard). Additionally, there are no bicycle facilities on Diamond Boulevard within the immediate Project vicinity. The 2016 City of Concord Bicycle, Pedestrian & Safe Routes to Transit Plan identifies that a complete street study and Class 3 Bike Route are recommended along Diamond Boulevard near the project site.
Pedestrian Facilities
There are existing sidewalks along both sides of Galaxy Way, with crosswalks located at the Diamond Boulevard and Galaxy Way intersections. There are existing sidewalks along both sides of Diamond Boulevard.
Data Collection
Intersection turning movement counts, including separate counts of pedestrians, bicyclists, and heavy trucks were collected in February 2022 during the weekday evening (4:00 to 6:00 PM) and Saturday (11:00 AM to 2:00 PM) peak periods to coincide with the time-periods when adjacent street traffic demands are the greatest, and with the nearby school arrival patterns. Peak hour intersection volumes are summarized on Figure 3 along with existing lane configurations and traffic controls. In some cases, existing volumes were manually adjusted to account for imbalances in the count data between closely spaced intersections. The traffic counts are provided in Attachment B.
Existing Intersection LOS
Existing intersection lane configurations, signal timings, and peak hour turning movement volumes were input into the Synchro 11.0 software program to calculate the LOS for the study intersections during each peak hour. Detailed LOS calculation worksheets can be found in Attachment B. As shown in Table 2, all signalized intersections currently operate within the level of service standards set by the City of Concord.
Table 2: Existing Delay and LOS
Intersection Control1 Peak
Hour2
Existing
Delay3 LOS
1 Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave Signal PM
SAT
25.4 C
27.2 C
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Intersection Control1 Peak
Hour2
Existing
Delay3 LOS
2 Meridian Park Blvd & Concord
Ave Signal PM SAT
10.2 B
15.3 B
3 John Glenn Dr & Concord Ave Signal PM
SAT
9.4 A
14.2 B
4 Commerce Ave/SR 242 &
Concord Ave Signal PM SAT
20.9 C
34.1 C
5 Market St/SR 242 & Concord
Ave Signal PM SAT
15.3 B
13.1 B
6 Diamond Blvd & Burnett Ave Signal PM
SAT
58.1 E
45.8 D
7 Diamond Blvd & Galaxy Way Signal PM
SAT
17.7 B
15.3 B
8 Diamond Blvd & The
Veranda/Seafood City Driveway Signal PM SAT
47.8 D
22.2 C
9 Diamond Blvd & Willow Way Signal PM
SAT
17.5 B
24.6 C
10 Diamond Blvd & The
Willows/The Hilton Driveway Signal PM SAT
12.4 B
12.2 B
11 Willow Pass Rd & I-680
Northbound Ramps Signal PM SAT
21.5 C
27.3 C
12 Willow Pass Rd & Diamond Blvd Signal PM
SAT
38.4 D
45.6 D
13 Willow Pass Rd & Franquette
Ave Signal PM SAT
40.7 D
41.8 D
14 Willow Pass Rd & Market St4 Signal PM
SAT
35.1 D
35.9 D
Notes:
1. Existing intersection traffic control type, (Signal = Signalized).
2. PM= Weekday evening peak hour, SAT = Saturday peak hour.
3. Whole intersection average delay reported for signalized intersections. Delay calculated per HCM 6th methodologies.
4. Delay reported using HCM 2000 methodologies.
Source: Fehr & Peers, February 2022.
679 (774)
193 (273)
877 (911)
583 (809)
1,376 (1,252)
182 (222)
1. Diamond Blvd/Concord Ave
133 (183)
1 (9)
108 (125)
13 (29)
984 (941)
70 (131) 18 (40) 7 (6)
5 (18)
6 (12)
1,407 (1,309)
120 (182)
2. Meridian Park Blvd/Concord Ave
117 (88)
20 (28)
261 (249)
68 (136)
922 (896)
60 (55) 96 (117) 12 (21)
35 (22)
27 (29)
1,320 (1,283)
149 (198)
3. John Glenn Dr/Concord Ave
31 (20)53 (20)
186 (92)
1,456 (1,082)
36 (18) 456 (787) 37 (57)
616 (876)
191 (200)
864 (944)
79 (64)
4. SR 242/Commerce Ave/Concord Ave
218 (253)462 (487)
103 (81)
1,269 (1,178)
555 (529)
207 (519)
899 (921)
54 (71)
5. Market St/Concord Ave
166 (271)396 (512)
26 (56)
393 (490)
117 (146)
105 (201) 238 (353) 525 (619)
23 (32)
31 (26)
39 (37)
25 (26)
6. Diamond Blvd/Burnett Ave
48 (40)
426 (531)
37 (50)
135 (185)
25 (25)
32 (54) 151 (194) 525 (659)
54 (46)
66 (82)
18 (14)
82 (88)
7. Diamond Blvd/Galaxy Way
337 (420)229 (333)
9 (12)
138 (174)
13 (23)
154 (229) 131 (160) 399 (457)
66 (106)
51 (88)
4 (16)
51 (53)
8. Diamond Blvd/The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Concord Ave Concord Ave
John Glenn Dr
Concord Ave
SR 242 Commerce Ave
Concord Ave
Market St
Burnett Ave
Diamond Blvd
Galaxy Way
Diamond Blvd
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Diamond Blvd
42 (73)
535 (676)139 (240)
67 (118)
9 (15)
56 (106)597 (682) 20 (26)
15 (25)
7 (14)
174 (254)
9. Diamond Blvd/Willow Way
Willow Way
Diamond Blvd
249 (324)635 (899)
10 (3)
60 (86)
0 (0)
50 (107) 69 (77) 788 (966)
1 (1)
4 (0)
1 (0)
7 (0)
10. Diamond Blvd/Willows Hilton Dwy
Willows Hilton Dwy
Diamond Blvd
290 (474)
2 (4)
240 (483)
508 (540)
1,673 (1,322)
420 (387)
1,038 (1,324)
11. I-680 NB Ramps/Willow Pass Rd
179 (159)
50 (78)87 (84)
442 (704)
1,309 (881)
69 (120) 479 (738) 41 (47)
403 (399)
371 (441)
838 (730)
73 (110)
12. Diamond Blvd/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
I-680 NB On-Ramp I-680 NB Off-Ramp
Willow Pass Rd
Diamond Blvd
Concord Ave
Meridian Park Blvd
CCCF
AAF ACCC
ACCE
ABF
D
ACCE
ACCE
ACF
ACF
ACCCF
CCE
ACF
AAEF
ACCE
CCE
AACE ACCEF
AACF
ACCE
ACCF
ACE
AAE
ACCE
ACCE
AAE
ABF
AACE
ACCE D
AE
ACCE
ACCC
AAE
BF
AACCE
ACCE
BE
AACC
ABFF CCCFAACCF
AACCCF
AACFF
AACCCF
85 (30)
4 (1)
116 (38)
53 (60)
1,702 (1,233)
18 (14) 114 (45) 2 (0)
99 (19)
19 (22)
1,077 (1,214)
50 (40)
13. Waterworld Pkwy/Franquette Ave/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Waterworld Pkwy Franquette Ave
AACF
AACCCF
AACF
ACCE
169 (150)
1,293 (811) 179 (190) 352 (292)
61 (47)
29 (49)
478 (690)
14. Market St/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Pine St
Market St
AACCE
ACCF
CCE
Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Traffic
Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls
Figure 3
171 (130)
327 (267)
378 (407)465 (475)171 (141)
4 (9)
AACE
91 (83)
1. Diamond Blvd/Concord Ave 2. Meridian Park Blvd/Concord Ave 3. John Glenn Dr/Concord Ave
4. SR 242/Commerce Ave/Concord Ave 5. Market St/Concord Ave 6. Diamond Blvd/Burnett Ave
7. Diamond Blvd/Galaxy Way 8. Diamond Blvd/The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy Concord Ave Concord Ave
John Glenn Dr
Concord Ave
SR 242 Commerce Ave
Concord Ave
Market St
Burnett Ave
Diamond Blvd
Galaxy Way
Diamond Blvd
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Diamond Blvd
9. Diamond Blvd/Willow Way
Willow Way
Diamond Blvd
10. Diamond Blvd/Willows Hilton Dwy
Willows Hilton Dwy
Diamond Blvd
11. I-680 NB Ramps/Willow Pass Rd 12. Diamond Blvd/Willow Pass Rd Willow Pass Rd
I-680 NB On-Ramp I-680 NB Off-Ramp
Willow Pass Rd
Diamond Blvd
Concord Ave
Meridian Park Blvd
13. Waterworld Pkwy/Franquette Ave/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Waterworld Pkwy Franquette Ave
14. Market St/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Market St
Project Trip Assignment
Figure 5
20 (19)
8 25
(8)
(28)
17 (19)
16 (16)
8 (8)
17 (19)
4 (5)
24 (24)
21 (24)
24 (24)10 (12)
11 (12)
12 (12)
12 (12)
11 (12)
10 (9)
28 (27)
12 (13)42 (47)
22 (23)
38 (36)
16 (16)
32 (32)54 (60)
4 (5)
22 (23)
32 (32)
22 (23)
32 (32)
22 (23)
32 (32)
5 (5)
5 (5)
15 (15)
5 (5)15 (15) 17 (17)
17 (18)
AF F
A
F C AC
C
C
C F C
AC
C
AC F C
ACF
A
F C
C
C
C
C
C
C
AC
C
A AF F
17 (17)
17 (18)
C
C
5 (5)
2 (2)
10 (10)2 (2)
10 (11)
A A
5 (5)
FC
F C
Existing Plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls
Figure 6
1. Diamond Blvd/Concord Ave 2. Meridian Park Blvd/Concord Ave 3. John Glenn Dr/Concord Ave
4. SR 242/Commerce Ave/Concord Ave 5. Market St/Concord Ave 6. Diamond Blvd/Burnett Ave
7. Diamond Blvd/Galaxy Way 8. Diamond Blvd/The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy Concord Ave Concord Ave
John Glenn Dr
Concord Ave
SR 242 Commerce Ave
Concord Ave
Market St
Burnett Ave
Diamond Blvd
Galaxy Way
Diamond Blvd
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Diamond Blvd
9. Diamond Blvd/Willow Way
Willow Way
Diamond Blvd
10. Diamond Blvd/Willows Hilton Dwy
Willows Hilton Dwy
Diamond Blvd
11. I-680 NB Ramps/Willow Pass Rd 12. Diamond Blvd/Willow Pass Rd Willow Pass Rd
I-680 NB On-Ramp I-680 NB Off-Ramp
Willow Pass Rd
Diamond Blvd
Concord Ave
Meridian Park Blvd
13. Waterworld Pkwy/Franquette Ave/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Waterworld Pkwy Franquette Ave
14. Market St/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Market St
699 (793)201 (281
877 (911) )
608 (837)
1,376 (1,252)
199 (241)
133 (183)
1 (9)
124 (141)
13 (29)
992 (949)
70 (131) 18 (40) 7 (6)
5 (18)
6 (12)
1,424 (1,328)
124 (187)
117 (88)
20 (28)
261 (249)
68 (136)
946 (920)
60 (55) 96 (117) 12 (21)
35 (22)
27 (29)
1,341 (1,307)
149 (198)
31 (20)53 (20)
186 (92
1,480 (1,106) )
36 (18) 466 (799) 37 (57)
616 (876)
191 (200)
875 (956)
79 (64)
218 (253)462 (487)
103 (81
1,281 (1,190) )
555 (529)
207 (519)
910 (933)
54 (71)
176 (280)424 (539)
26 (56)
393 (490)
117 (146)
117 (214) 238 (353) 567 (666)
23 (32)
31 (26)
39 (37)
25 (26)
70 (63)
426 (531)
37 (50)
173 (221)
41 (41)
64 (86) 205 (254) 525 (659)
54 (46)
66 (82)
22 (19)
82 (88)
337 (420)251 (356)
9 (12)
138 (174)
13 (23)
154 (229) 131 (160) 431 (489)
66 (106)
51 (88)
4 (16)
51 (53)
42 (73)
557 (699)139 (240)
67 (118)
9 (15)
56 (106)629 (714) 20 (26)
15 (25)
7 (14)
174 (254)
249 (324)657 (922)
10 (3)
60 (86)
0 (0)
50 (107) 69 (77) 820 (998)
1 (1)
4 (0)
1 (0)
7 (0)
290 (474)
2 (4)
240 (483
513 (545) )
1,678 (1,327)
420 (387)
1,053 (1,339)
179 (159)
50 (78)87 (84)
447 (709)
1,309 (881)
69 (120) 494 (753) 41 (47)
420 (416)
388 (459)
838 (730)
73 (110)
CCCF
AAF ACCC
ACCE
ABF
D
ACCE
ACCE
ACF
ACF
ACCCF
CCE
ACF
AAEF
ACCE
CCE
AACE ACCEF
AACF
ACCE
ACCF
ACE
AAE
ACCE
ACCE
AAE
ABF
AACE
ACCE
D
AE
ACCE
ACCC
AAE
BF
AACCE
ACCE
BE
AACC
ABF F CCCFAACCF
AACCCF
AACFF
AACCCF
85 (30)
4 (1)
116 (38)
53 (60)
1,719 (1,250)
18 (14) 114 (45) 2 (0)
99 (19)
19 (22)
1,094 (1,232)
50 (40)
AACF
AACCCF
AACF
ACCE
383 (412)465 (475)171 (141)
171 (152)
1,303 (821) 181 (192) 352 (292)
61 (47)
29 (49)
488 (701)
AACE
AACC
ACCF
CCE
E
Pine St
171 (130)
332 (272)
91 (83)
4 (9)
CONCORD
T HILL
Contra Costa Blvd
Cowell Rd
Golf Club Rd
Pacheco Blvd
Clayton Rd
Concord Blvd
Willow Pass Rd
E Olivera Rd
Galindo St
Concord Ave
East St
Port Chicago Hwy
Meadow Ln
Detroit Ave
Willow Pass Rd
Ellinwood Dr
Grant St
Blvd
Solano Way
Marsh Dr
Salvio St
Market St
Monument Blvd
Diamond Blvd
Meridian Park Blvd
John Glenn Dr
Burnett Ave
·242
%&680
·242
%&680
Buchanan
Field Airport
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
WC21-3866_1_StudyArea
Project Site Study Intersection #
XX (YY) PM (Saturday) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Existing Vehicle Queues
Although all intersections currently operate within the standards set by the City of Concord, there can be periodic vehicle queue spillback and delays for some individual movements. Table 3 presents PM and SAT peak hour 95th percentile queues for movements where vehicle queues may occasionally exceed the vehicle storage length. These queues are indicative of maximum design queues occurring during periods of peak traffic. Queue worksheets are provided in Attachment C.
Table 3: Existing Conditions - 95th Percentile Turn Pocket Queue Summary at Signalized Intersections
Intersection Movement Storage Length
(ft)1 PM Peak Period SAT Peak Period
1 Diamond Blvd &
Concord Ave WBL 125 200 325
6 Diamond Blvd &
Burnett Ave NBL 175 225 300
8 Diamond Blvd & The
Veranda/Seafood City
Dwy
SBL 125 100 150
9 Diamond Blvd & Willow
Way NBL 75 75 100
10 Diamond Blvd &
Willows Hilton Dwy NBL 125 125 150
12 Diamond Blvd & Willow
Pass Rd
EBL 300 275 400
SBL 125 250 300
14 Market St & Pine Street
& Willow Pass Rd SBL 200 250 175
Notes:
An additional 60 to 90 feet of storage is typically provided in the taper area outside of the through lane, which is not reflected in the storage length above.
Bold indicates queue potentially extends beyond available storage.
Source: Fehr & Peers, February 2022.
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
ProjectCharacteristics
This section provides an overview of the proposed Project and addresses the proposed Project trip generation, distribution, and assignment characteristics used to evaluate potential Project effects on the surrounding roadway network. The amount of traffic associated with the Project was estimated using a three-step process:
1. Trip Generation – The amount of vehicle traffic entering/exiting the Project site was estimated.
2. Trip Distribution – The direction trips would use to approach and depart the site was projected.
3. Trip Assignment – Trips were then assigned to specific roadway segments and intersection turning movements.
Trip Generation
Trip generation refers to the process of estimating the amount of vehicular traffic a project would add to the surrounding roadway system. Estimates are created for the peak one-hour periods during the weekday morning, evening and Saturday peak commute hours when traffic volumes on adjacent streets are typically at their highest and the Project is expected to generate the most traffic.
Previously, Fehr & Peers retained a traffic count firm to collect multimodal (i.e. vehicles, trucks, pedestrians, and bicycles) weekday morning (7:00-9:00 AM), evening (4:00-6:00 PM), and Saturday peak period (10:00 AM – 2:00 PM) driveway counts at an existing dispensary, CoCo Farms, located at 3400 Wilbur Avenue in Antioch, CA, a site that provides similar operations as the proposed Project, to determine locally based trip generation rates.
Trip generation rates for various land uses based on a sampling of sites throughout the United States are published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition). However, given the limited number of sample sites collected for marijuana dispensary in the Trip Generation Manual, developing a trip generation rate based on local data is appropriate. Therefore, trip generation estimates for the Project were calculated using the driveway counts at the Antioch CoCo Farms site. This analysis is documented in more detail in the Kolaboration Concord, Trip Generation and VMT Screening Assessment memorandum dated October 20, 2021 (provided as Attachment A).
Operating hours for the Project are proposed to begin at 9:00 AM, outside of the typical AM peak hour. Therefore, the transportation analysis will focus on the PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. Based on the rates developed from the Antioch CoCo Farms location, the project is
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
expected to generate 166 evening peak hour trips, and 172 Saturday peak hour trips based on the number of employees expected at the site.
Table 5: Authentic Trip Generation Estimates
Use Size
Weekday PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Based on Observed and ITE 11th Edition Trip Generation Rates Marijuana
Dispensary1
40 Employees 80 86 166 88 84 172
Total 80 86 166 88 84 172
Notes:
1. Estimate using custom rates developed from CoCo farms driveway count data and 40 Authentic retail employees.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022
Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
Project trip distribution refers to the directions of approach and departure that vehicles would take to access and leave the site. Estimates of regional Project trip distribution were developed using Streetlight Data, and the location of complementary land uses. Streetlight Data uses anonymized and aggregated location data from Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and mobile devices such as cellphones. This data was used to establish travel patterns for the nearby retail uses at the shopping center containing Buffalo Wild Wings and the Seafood City grocery store, Heritage Square, located on 1150 Concord Avenue 2090 Diamond Boulevard in Concord, California, approximately 0.26 miles from the Project site. Trip distribution estimates are presented on Figure 4. Overall trip distribution is expected to be similar in various analysis scenarios. The Project trip generation estimates, in combination with the expected trip distribution patterns, were used to assign vehicle trips to the local roadway network, as shown on Figure 5.
Martinez
Park Reserve
CONCORD
MARTINEZ
PLEASANT HILL
Contra Costa Blvd
Cowell Rd
ChilpancingoPkwy
Golf Club Rd
Muir Rd
Pacheco Blvd
Clayton Rd
Concord Blvd
Willow Pass Rd
E Olivera Rd
Galindo St
Concord Ave
East St
Port Chicago Hwy
Meadow Ln
Detroit Ave
Willow Pass Rd
Alhambra Ave
Paso Nogal Rd
Morello Ave
Ellinwood Dr
Grant St
Taylor Blvd
Solano Way
Marsh Dr
Arnold Dr
Salvio St
Paso Nogal
Market St
Center Ave
Monument Blvd
Diamond Blvd
Meridian Park Blvd
John Glenn Dr
Burnett Ave
·242
·4
%&680
·242
%&680
Buchanan
Field Airport
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
4%
4%
8%
16%
14%
14%
2%
6%
12%
11%
9%
Project Trip Distribution
Figure 4
WC21-3866_4_TripDistro
Project Site XX% Project Trip Distribution
679 (774)
193 (273)
877 (911)
583 (809)
1,376 (1,252)
182 (222)
1. Diamond Blvd/Concord Ave
133 (183)
1 (9)
108 (125)
13 (29)
984 (941)
70 (131) 18 (40) 7 (6)
5 (18)
6 (12)
1,407 (1,309)
120 (182)
2. Meridian Park Blvd/Concord Ave
117 (88)
20 (28)
261 (249)
68 (136)
922 (896)
60 (55) 96 (117) 12 (21)
35 (22)
27 (29)
1,320 (1,283)
149 (198)
3. John Glenn Dr/Concord Ave
31 (20)53 (20)
186 (92)
1,456 (1,082)
36 (18) 456 (787) 37 (57)
616 (876)
191 (200)
864 (944)
79 (64)
4. SR 242/Commerce Ave/Concord Ave
218 (253)462 (487)
103 (81)
1,269 (1,178)
555 (529)
207 (519)
899 (921)
54 (71)
5. Market St/Concord Ave
166 (271)396 (512)
26 (56)
393 (490)
117 (146)
105 (201) 238 (353) 525 (619)
23 (32)
31 (26)
39 (37)
25 (26)
6. Diamond Blvd/Burnett Ave
48 (40)
426 (531)
37 (50)
135 (185)
25 (25)
32 (54) 151 (194) 525 (659)
54 (46)
66 (82)
18 (14)
82 (88)
7. Diamond Blvd/Galaxy Way
337 (420)229 (333)
9 (12)
138 (174)
13 (23)
154 (229) 131 (160) 399 (457)
66 (106)
51 (88)
4 (16)
51 (53)
8. Diamond Blvd/The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Concord Ave Concord Ave
John Glenn Dr
Concord Ave
SR 242 Commerce Ave
Concord Ave
Market St
Burnett Ave
Diamond Blvd
Galaxy Way
Diamond Blvd
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Diamond Blvd
42 (73)
535 (676)139 (240)
67 (118)
9 (15)
56 (106)597 (682) 20 (26)
15 (25)
7 (14)
174 (254)
9. Diamond Blvd/Willow Way
Willow Way
Diamond Blvd
249 (324)635 (899)
10 (3)
60 (86)
0 (0)
50 (107) 69 (77) 788 (966)
1 (1)
4 (0)
1 (0)
7 (0)
10. Diamond Blvd/Willows Hilton Dwy
Willows Hilton Dwy
Diamond Blvd
290 (474)
2 (4)
240 (483)
508 (540)
1,673 (1,322)
420 (387)
1,038 (1,324)
11. I-680 NB Ramps/Willow Pass Rd
179 (159)
50 (78)87 (84)
442 (704)
1,309 (881)
69 (120) 479 (738) 41 (47)
403 (399)
371 (441)
838 (730)
73 (110)
12. Diamond Blvd/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
I-680 NB On-Ramp I-680 NB Off-Ramp
Willow Pass Rd
Diamond Blvd
Concord Ave
Meridian Park Blvd
CCCF
AAF ACCC
ACCE
ABF
D
ACCE
ACCE
ACF
ACF
ACCCF
CCE
ACF
AAEF
ACCE
CCE
AACE ACCEF
AACF
ACCE
ACCF
ACE
AAE
ACCE
ACCE
AAE
ABF
AACE
ACCE D
AE
ACCE
ACCC
AAE
BF
AACCE
ACCE
BE
AACC
ABFF CCCFAACCF
AACCCF
AACFF
AACCCF
85 (30)
4 (1)
116 (38)
53 (60)
1,702 (1,233)
18 (14) 114 (45) 2 (0)
99 (19)
19 (22)
1,077 (1,214)
50 (40)
13. Waterworld Pkwy/Franquette Ave/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Waterworld Pkwy Franquette Ave
AACF
AACCCF
AACF
ACCE
169 (150)
1,293 (811) 179 (190) 352 (292)
61 (47)
29 (49)
478 (690)
14. Market St/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Market St
378 (407)465 (475)171 (141)
AACE
AACCC
ACCF
CCE
Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Traffic
Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls
Figure 3
327 (267) F
4 (9)
F
91 (83)
A
1. Diamond Blvd/Concord Ave 2. Meridian Park Blvd/Concord Ave 3. John Glenn Dr/Concord Ave
4. SR 242/Commerce Ave/Concord Ave 5. Market St/Concord Ave 6. Diamond Blvd/Burnett Ave
7. Diamond Blvd/Galaxy Way 8. Diamond Blvd/The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy Concord Ave Concord Ave
John Glenn Dr
Concord Ave
SR 242 Commerce Ave
Concord Ave
Market St
Burnett Ave
Diamond Blvd
Galaxy Way
Diamond Blvd
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Diamond Blvd
9. Diamond Blvd/Willow Way
Willow Way
Diamond Blvd
10. Diamond Blvd/Willows Hilton Dwy
Willows Hilton Dwy
Diamond Blvd
11. I-680 NB Ramps/Willow Pass Rd 12. Diamond Blvd/Willow Pass Rd Willow Pass Rd
I-680 NB On-Ramp I-680 NB Off-Ramp
Willow Pass Rd
Diamond Blvd
Concord Ave
Meridian Park Blvd
13. Waterworld Pkwy/Franquette Ave/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Waterworld Pkwy Franquette Ave
14. Market St/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Market St
Project Trip Assignment
Figure 5
20 (19)
8 25
(8)
(28)
17 (19)
16 (16)
8 (8)
17 (19)
4 (5)
24 (24)
21 (24)
24 (24)10 (12)
11 (12)
12 (12)
12 (12)
11 (12)
10 (9)
28 (27)
12 (13)42 (47)
22 (23)
38 (36)
16 (16)
32 (32)54 (60)
4 (5)
22 (23)
32 (32)
22 (23)
32 (32)
22 (23)
32 (32)
5 (5)
5 (5)
15 (15)
5 (5)15 (15) 17 (17)
17 (18)
AF F
A
F C AC
C
C
C F C
AC
C
AC F C
ACF
A
F C
C
C
C
C
C
C
AC
C
A AF F
17 (17)
17 (18)
C
C
5 (5)
2 (2)
10 (10)2 (2)
10 (11)
A A
5 (5)
FC
F C
Existing Plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls
Figure 6
1. Diamond Blvd/Concord Ave 2. Meridian Park Blvd/Concord Ave 3. John Glenn Dr/Concord Ave
4. SR 242/Commerce Ave/Concord Ave 5. Market St/Concord Ave 6. Diamond Blvd/Burnett Ave
7. Diamond Blvd/Galaxy Way 8. Diamond Blvd/The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy Concord Ave Concord Ave
John Glenn Dr
Concord Ave
SR 242 Commerce Ave
Concord Ave
Market St
Burnett Ave
Diamond Blvd
Galaxy Way
Diamond Blvd
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Diamond Blvd
9. Diamond Blvd/Willow Way
Willow Way
Diamond Blvd
10. Diamond Blvd/Willows Hilton Dwy
Willows Hilton Dwy
Diamond Blvd
11. I-680 NB Ramps/Willow Pass Rd 12. Diamond Blvd/Willow Pass Rd Willow Pass Rd
I-680 NB On-Ramp I-680 NB Off-Ramp
Willow Pass Rd
Diamond Blvd
Concord Ave
Meridian Park Blvd
13. Waterworld Pkwy/Franquette Ave/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Waterworld Pkwy Franquette Ave
14. Market St/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Market St
699 (793)201 (281
877 (911) )
608 (837)
1,376 (1,252)
199 (241)
133 (183)
1 (9)
124 (141)
13 (29)
992 (949)
70 (131) 18 (40) 7 (6)
5 (18)
6 (12)
1,424 (1,328)
124 (187)
117 (88)
20 (28)
261 (249)
68 (136)
946 (920)
60 (55) 96 (117) 12 (21)
35 (22)
27 (29)
1,341 (1,307)
149 (198)
31 (20)53 (20)
186 (92
1,480 (1,106) )
36 (18) 466 (799) 37 (57)
616 (876)
191 (200)
875 (956)
79 (64)
218 (253)462 (487)
103 (81
1,281 (1,190) )
555 (529)
207 (519)
910 (933)
54 (71)
176 (280)424 (539)
26 (56)
393 (490)
117 (146)
117 (214) 238 (353) 567 (666)
23 (32)
31 (26)
39 (37)
25 (26)
70 (63)
426 (531)
37 (50)
173 (221)
41 (41)
64 (86) 205 (254) 525 (659)
54 (46)
66 (82)
22 (19)
82 (88)
337 (420)251 (356)
9 (12)
138 (174)
13 (23)
154 (229) 131 (160) 431 (489)
66 (106)
51 (88)
4 (16)
51 (53)
42 (73)
557 (699)139 (240)
67 (118)
9 (15)
56 (106)629 (714) 20 (26)
15 (25)
7 (14)
174 (254)
249 (324)657 (922)
10 (3)
60 (86)
0 (0)
50 (107) 69 (77) 820 (998)
1 (1)
4 (0)
1 (0)
7 (0)
290 (474)
2 (4)
240 (483
513 (545) )
1,678 (1,327)
420 (387)
1,053 (1,339)
179 (159)
50 (78)87 (84)
447 (709)
1,309 (881)
69 (120) 494 (753) 41 (47)
420 (416)
388 (459)
838 (730)
73 (110)
CCCF
AAF ACCC
ACCE
ABF
D
ACCE
ACCE
ACF
ACF
ACCCF
CCE
ACF
AAEF
ACCE
CCE
AACE ACCEF
AACF
ACCE
ACCF
ACE
AAE
ACCE
ACCE
AAE
ABF
AACE
ACCE
D
AE
ACCE
ACCC
AAE
BF
AACCE
ACCE
BE
AACC
ABF F CCCFAACCF
AACCCF
AACFF
AACCCF
85 (30)
4 (1)
116 (38)
53 (60)
1,719 (1,250)
18 (14) 114 (45) 2 (0)
99 (19)
19 (22)
1,094 (1,232)
50 (40)
AACF
AACCCF
AACF
ACCE
383 (412)465 (475)171 (141)
171 (152)
1,303 (821) 181 (192) 352 (292)
61 (47)
29 (49)
488 (701)
AACE
AACCC
ACCF
CCE
CONCORD
T HILL
Contra Costa Blvd
Cowell Rd
Golf Club Rd
Pacheco Blvd
Clayton Rd
Concord Blvd
Willow Pass Rd
E Olivera Rd
Galindo St
Concord Ave
East St
Port Chicago Hwy
Meadow Ln
Detroit Ave
Willow Pass Rd
Ellinwood Dr
Grant St
Blvd
Solano Way
Marsh Dr
Salvio St
Market St
Monument Blvd
Diamond Blvd
Meridian Park Blvd
John Glenn Dr
Burnett Ave
·242
%&680
·242
%&680
Buchanan
Field Airport
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
WC21-3866_1_StudyArea
Project Site Study Intersection #
XX (YY) PM (Saturday) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
ExistingwithProject
TrafficConditions
This section presents the evaluation of intersection LOS under Existing with Project conditions.
Existing with Project Traffic Volumes
The Project traffic volumes on Figure 5 were added to the existing traffic volumes from Figure 3 to estimate the Existing with Project traffic volumes, as shown on Figure 6.
Analysis of Existing with Project Conditions
Intersection Operations
Existing with Project intersection operations were evaluated using the methods previously described. The Existing with Project analysis results are presented in Table 6, based on the traffic volumes and intersection configurations presented on Figure 6. Table 6 also includes the operations results for Existing conditions. The addition of Project traffic would slightly increase delay at most study intersections, but not result in conditions that fall below the City of Concord’s thresholds. At six of the study intersections, the addition of project trips results in a reduction to the average peak hour intersection delay as shown in Table 6. The average overall delay at an intersection may decrease with the addition of project trips if those trips are added to an approach that experiences lower than the average overall intersection delay.
Table 6: Existing and Existing Plus Project Level of Service Summary Intersection Control1 Peak
Hour2
Existing Existing Plus Project
Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS
1 Diamond Blvd &
Concord Ave Signal PM SAT
25.4 C 26.5 C
27.2 C 28.3 C
2 Meridian Park Blvd &
Concord Ave Signal PM
SAT
10.2 B 10.3 B
15.3 B 15.6 B
3 John Glenn Dr &
Concord Ave Signal PM SAT
9.4 A 9.4 A
14.2 B 14.1 B
4 Commerce Ave/SR
242 & Concord Ave Signal PM
SAT
20.9 C 21.1 C
34.1 C 34.3 C
5 Market St/SR 242 &
Concord Ave Signal PM SAT
15.3 B 15.4 B
13.1 B 13.3 B
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Intersection Control1 Peak
Hour2
Existing Existing Plus Project
Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS
6 Diamond Blvd &
Burnett Ave Signal PM SAT
58.1 E 57.2 E
45.8 D 47.7 D
7 Diamond Blvd &
Galaxy Way Signal PM SAT
17.7 B 20.9 C
15.3 B 16.5 B
8 Diamond Blvd & The
Veranda/Seafood
City Driveway
Signal PM
SAT
47.8 D 46.2 D
22.2 C 22.5 C
9 Diamond Blvd &
Willow Way Signal PM SAT
17.5 B 17.2 B
24.6 C 24.6 C
10 Diamond Blvd & The
Willows/The Hilton
Driveway
Signal PM
SAT
12.4 B 12.5 B
12.2 B 12.1 B
11 Willow Pass Rd & I680 Northbound
Ramps
Signal PM
SAT
21.5 C 21.7 C
27.3 C 28.0 C
12 Willow Pass Rd &
Diamond Blvd Signal PM
SAT
38.4 D 38.6 D
45.6 D 48.2 D
13 Willow Pass Rd &
Franquette Ave Signal PM SAT
40.7 D 40.8 D
41.8 D 48.7 D
14 Willow Pass Rd &
Market St4 Signal PM
SAT
35.1 D 35.1 D
35.9 D 35.9 D
Notes:
1. Existing intersection traffic control type, (SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled)_ (Signal = Signalized).
2. PM = Weekday evening peak hour, SAT = Weekend peak hour.
3. Whole intersection average delay reported for signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections. Side-Street stop-controlled delay presented as Whole Intersection Average Delay (Worst Movement Delay). Delay calculated per HCM 6th methodologies.
4. Delay reported using HCM 2000 methodologies.
Source: Fehr & Peers, February 2022.
679 (774)
193 (273)
877 (911)
583 (809)
1,376 (1,252)
182 (222)
1. Diamond Blvd/Concord Ave
133 (183)
1 (9)
108 (125)
13 (29)
984 (941)
70 (131) 18 (40) 7 (6)
5 (18)
6 (12)
1,407 (1,309)
120 (182)
2. Meridian Park Blvd/Concord Ave
117 (88)
20 (28)
261 (249)
68 (136)
922 (896)
60 (55) 96 (117) 12 (21)
35 (22)
27 (29)
1,320 (1,283)
149 (198)
3. John Glenn Dr/Concord Ave
31 (20)53 (20)
186 (92)
1,456 (1,082)
36 (18) 456 (787) 37 (57)
616 (876)
191 (200)
864 (944)
79 (64)
4. SR 242/Commerce Ave/Concord Ave
218 (253)462 (487)
103 (81)
1,269 (1,178)
555 (529)
207 (519)
899 (921)
54 (71)
5. Market St/Concord Ave
166 (271)396 (512)
26 (56)
393 (490)
117 (146)
105 (201) 238 (353) 525 (619)
23 (32)
31 (26)
39 (37)
25 (26)
6. Diamond Blvd/Burnett Ave
48 (40)
426 (531)
37 (50)
135 (185)
25 (25)
32 (54) 151 (194) 525 (659)
54 (46)
66 (82)
18 (14)
82 (88)
7. Diamond Blvd/Galaxy Way
337 (420)229 (333)
9 (12)
138 (174)
13 (23)
154 (229) 131 (160) 399 (457)
66 (106)
51 (88)
4 (16)
51 (53)
8. Diamond Blvd/The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Concord Ave Concord Ave
John Glenn Dr
Concord Ave
SR 242 Commerce Ave
Concord Ave
Market St
Burnett Ave
Diamond Blvd
Galaxy Way
Diamond Blvd
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Diamond Blvd
42 (73)
535 (676)139 (240)
67 (118)
9 (15)
56 (106)597 (682) 20 (26)
15 (25)
7 (14)
174 (254)
9. Diamond Blvd/Willow Way
Willow Way
Diamond Blvd
249 (324)635 (899)
10 (3)
60 (86)
0 (0)
50 (107) 69 (77) 788 (966)
1 (1)
4 (0)
1 (0)
7 (0)
10. Diamond Blvd/Willows Hilton Dwy
Willows Hilton Dwy
Diamond Blvd
290 (474)
2 (4)
240 (483)
508 (540)
1,673 (1,322)
420 (387)
1,038 (1,324)
11. I-680 NB Ramps/Willow Pass Rd
179 (159)
50 (78)87 (84)
442 (704)
1,309 (881)
69 (120) 479 (738) 41 (47)
403 (399)
371 (441)
838 (730)
73 (110)
12. Diamond Blvd/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
I-680 NB On-Ramp I-680 NB Off-Ramp
Willow Pass Rd
Diamond Blvd
Concord Ave
Meridian Park Blvd
CCCF
AAF ACCC
ACCE
ABF
D
ACCE
ACCE
ACF
ACF
ACCCF
CCE
ACF
AAEF
ACCE
CCE
AACE ACCEF
AACF
ACCE
ACCF
ACE
AAE
ACCE
ACCE
AAE
ABF
AACE
ACCE D
AE
ACCE
ACCC
AAE
BF
AACCE
ACCE
BE
AACC
ABFF CCCFAACCF
AACCCF
AACFF
AACCCF
85 (30)
4 (1)
116 (38)
53 (60)
1,702 (1,233)
18 (14) 114 (45) 2 (0)
99 (19)
19 (22)
1,077 (1,214)
50 (40)
13. Waterworld Pkwy/Franquette Ave/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Waterworld Pkwy Franquette Ave
AACF
AACCCF
AACF
ACCE
169 (150)
1,293 (811) 179 (190) 352 (292)
61 (47)
29 (49)
478 (690)
14. Market St/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Pine St
Market St
AACCE
ACCF
CCE
Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Traffic
Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls
Figure 3
171 (130)
327 (267)
378 (407)465 (475)171 (141)
4 (9)
AACE
91 (83)
1. Diamond Blvd/Concord Ave 2. Meridian Park Blvd/Concord Ave 3. John Glenn Dr/Concord Ave
4. SR 242/Commerce Ave/Concord Ave 5. Market St/Concord Ave 6. Diamond Blvd/Burnett Ave
7. Diamond Blvd/Galaxy Way 8. Diamond Blvd/The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy Concord Ave Concord Ave
John Glenn Dr
Concord Ave
SR 242 Commerce Ave
Concord Ave
Market St
Burnett Ave
Diamond Blvd
Galaxy Way
Diamond Blvd
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Diamond Blvd
9. Diamond Blvd/Willow Way
Willow Way
Diamond Blvd
10. Diamond Blvd/Willows Hilton Dwy
Willows Hilton Dwy
Diamond Blvd
11. I-680 NB Ramps/Willow Pass Rd 12. Diamond Blvd/Willow Pass Rd Willow Pass Rd
I-680 NB On-Ramp I-680 NB Off-Ramp
Willow Pass Rd
Diamond Blvd
Concord Ave
Meridian Park Blvd
13. Waterworld Pkwy/Franquette Ave/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Waterworld Pkwy Franquette Ave
14. Market St/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Market St
Project Trip Assignment
Figure 5
20 (19)
8 25
(8)
(28)
17 (19)
16 (16)
8 (8)
17 (19)
4 (5)
24 (24)
21 (24)
24 (24)10 (12)
11 (12)
12 (12)
12 (12)
11 (12)
10 (9)
28 (27)
12 (13)42 (47)
22 (23)
38 (36)
16 (16)
32 (32)54 (60)
4 (5)
22 (23)
32 (32)
22 (23)
32 (32)
22 (23)
32 (32)
5 (5)
5 (5)
15 (15)
5 (5)15 (15) 17 (17)
17 (18)
AF F
A
F C AC
C
C
C F C
AC
C
AC F C
ACF
A
F C
C
C
C
C
C
C
AC
C
A AF F
17 (17)
17 (18)
C
C
5 (5)
2 (2)
10 (10)2 (2)
10 (11)
A A
5 (5)
FC
F C
Existing Plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes, Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls
Figure 6
1. Diamond Blvd/Concord Ave 2. Meridian Park Blvd/Concord Ave 3. John Glenn Dr/Concord Ave
4. SR 242/Commerce Ave/Concord Ave 5. Market St/Concord Ave 6. Diamond Blvd/Burnett Ave
7. Diamond Blvd/Galaxy Way 8. Diamond Blvd/The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy Concord Ave Concord Ave
John Glenn Dr
Concord Ave
SR 242 Commerce Ave
Concord Ave
Market St
Burnett Ave
Diamond Blvd
Galaxy Way
Diamond Blvd
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Diamond Blvd
9. Diamond Blvd/Willow Way
Willow Way
Diamond Blvd
10. Diamond Blvd/Willows Hilton Dwy
Willows Hilton Dwy
Diamond Blvd
11. I-680 NB Ramps/Willow Pass Rd 12. Diamond Blvd/Willow Pass Rd Willow Pass Rd
I-680 NB On-Ramp I-680 NB Off-Ramp
Willow Pass Rd
Diamond Blvd
Concord Ave
Meridian Park Blvd
13. Waterworld Pkwy/Franquette Ave/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Waterworld Pkwy Franquette Ave
14. Market St/Willow Pass Rd
Willow Pass Rd
Market St
699 (793)201 (281
877 (911) )
608 (837)
1,376 (1,252)
199 (241)
133 (183)
1 (9)
124 (141)
13 (29)
992 (949)
70 (131) 18 (40) 7 (6)
5 (18)
6 (12)
1,424 (1,328)
124 (187)
117 (88)
20 (28)
261 (249)
68 (136)
946 (920)
60 (55) 96 (117) 12 (21)
35 (22)
27 (29)
1,341 (1,307)
149 (198)
31 (20)53 (20)
186 (92
1,480 (1,106) )
36 (18) 466 (799) 37 (57)
616 (876)
191 (200)
875 (956)
79 (64)
218 (253)462 (487)
103 (81
1,281 (1,190) )
555 (529)
207 (519)
910 (933)
54 (71)
176 (280)424 (539)
26 (56)
393 (490)
117 (146)
117 (214) 238 (353) 567 (666)
23 (32)
31 (26)
39 (37)
25 (26)
70 (63)
426 (531)
37 (50)
173 (221)
41 (41)
64 (86) 205 (254) 525 (659)
54 (46)
66 (82)
22 (19)
82 (88)
337 (420)251 (356)
9 (12)
138 (174)
13 (23)
154 (229) 131 (160) 431 (489)
66 (106)
51 (88)
4 (16)
51 (53)
42 (73)
557 (699)139 (240)
67 (118)
9 (15)
56 (106)629 (714) 20 (26)
15 (25)
7 (14)
174 (254)
249 (324)657 (922)
10 (3)
60 (86)
0 (0)
50 (107) 69 (77) 820 (998)
1 (1)
4 (0)
1 (0)
7 (0)
290 (474)
2 (4)
240 (483
513 (545) )
1,678 (1,327)
420 (387)
1,053 (1,339)
179 (159)
50 (78)87 (84)
447 (709)
1,309 (881)
69 (120) 494 (753) 41 (47)
420 (416)
388 (459)
838 (730)
73 (110)
CCCF
AAF ACCC
ACCE
ABF
D
ACCE
ACCE
ACF
ACF
ACCCF
CCE
ACF
AAEF
ACCE
CCE
AACE ACCEF
AACF
ACCE
ACCF
ACE
AAE
ACCE
ACCE
AAE
ABF
AACE
ACCE
D
AE
ACCE
ACCC
AAE
BF
AACCE
ACCE
BE
AACC
ABF F CCCFAACCF
AACCCF
AACFF
AACCCF
85 (30)
4 (1)
116 (38)
53 (60)
1,719 (1,250)
18 (14) 114 (45) 2 (0)
99 (19)
19 (22)
1,094 (1,232)
50 (40)
AACF
AACCCF
AACF
ACCE
383 (412)465 (475)171 (141)
171 (152)
1,303 (821) 181 (192) 352 (292)
61 (47)
29 (49)
488 (701)
AACE
AACC
ACCF
CCE
E
Pine St
171 (130)
332 (272)
91 (83)
4 (9)
CONCORD
T HILL
Contra Costa Blvd
Cowell Rd
Golf Club Rd
Pacheco Blvd
Clayton Rd
Concord Blvd
Willow Pass Rd
E Olivera Rd
Galindo St
Concord Ave
East St
Port Chicago Hwy
Meadow Ln
Detroit Ave
Willow Pass Rd
Ellinwood Dr
Grant St
Blvd
Solano Way
Marsh Dr
Salvio St
Market St
Monument Blvd
Diamond Blvd
Meridian Park Blvd
John Glenn Dr
Burnett Ave
·242
%&680
·242
%&680
Buchanan
Field Airport
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
WC21-3866_1_StudyArea
Project Site Study Intersection #
XX (YY) PM (Saturday) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Vehicle Queues
The addition of Project traffic is not expected to cause queues to exceed the existing length of a turn pocket or increase turn-pocket queues by 50-feet or more where the queue already exceeds the available storage, with the exception of the westbound left-turn movement at Concord Avenue and Diamond Boulevard (Intersection 1) as shown in Table 7.
Table 7: Existing with Project Conditions 95th Percentile Turn Pocket Queue Summary at Signalized Intersections
Intersection Movement Storage Length
(ft)1
Existing Existing Plus Project
PM Peak
Period
SAT Peak
Period
PM Peak
Period
SAT Peak
Period
1 Diamond Blvd &
Concord Ave WBL 125 200 325 225 375
6 Diamond Blvd &
Burnett Ave NBL 175 225 300 250 300
8 Diamond Blvd &
The
Veranda/Seafood
City Dwy
SBL 125 100 150 125 150
9 Diamond Blvd &
Willow Way NBL 75 75 100 75 100
10 Diamond Blvd &
Willows Hilton
Dwy
NBL 125 125 150 125 150
12 Diamond Blvd &
Willow Pass Rd
EBL 300 275 400 275 425
SBL 125 250 300 250 300
14 Market St & Pine
Street & Willow
Pass Rd
SBL 200 250 175 250 175
Notes:
1. An additional 60 to 90 feet of storage is typically provided in the taper area outside of the through lane, which is not reflected in the storage length above.
2. Bold indicates queue potentially extends beyond available storage.
Source: Fehr & Peers, February 2022.
Operational Findings and Recommendations
The following detrimental effect and Recommended Condition of Approval were developed based on the findings above and criteria presented under the regulatory setting and LOS policies.
Detrimental Effect 1: The addition of Project traffic would increase the already exceeding - westbound left-turn pocket vehicle queue on Concord Avenue to Diamond Boulevard from 325-
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
feet to 375-feet in the Saturday peak hour under existing plus Project conditions. As noted under the regulatory setting and LOS policies, increasing vehicle queues by 50-feet or more where a queue exceeds the available storage without the project is a detrimental project effect.
Condition of Approval 1: The Project applicant shall contribute to the retiming of the traffic signal to provide additional green time for the westbound left turn movement. This retiming would reduce the increase in vehicle queues below the City’s threshold for a detrimental project effect. The effectiveness of the recommended improvement is shown in Table 8 and Table 9.
Table 8: Existing Delay and LOS with Retiming
Intersection Control1 Peak
Hour2
Existing Existing Plus
Project
Existing Plus
Project with Rec
Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS
1 Diamond Blvd &
Concord Ave Signal SAT 27.2 C 28.3 C 28.0 C
Notes:
1. Existing intersection traffic control type, (SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled)_ (Signal = Signalized).
2. PM = Weekday evening peak hour, SAT = Weekend peak hour.
3. Whole intersection average delay reported for signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections. Side-Street stop-controlled delay presented as Whole Intersection Average Delay (Worst Movement Delay). Delay calculated per HCM 6th methodologies.
Source: Fehr & Peers, February 2022.
Table 9: Existing with Project Conditions Turn Pocket 95th Percentile Queue with Retiming Summary
Intersection Move
ment
Storage
Length (ft)1
Existing Existing Plus
Project
Existing Plus
Project with Rec
SAT Peak Period SAT Peak Period SAT Peak Period
1 Diamond Blvd &
Concord Ave WBL 125 325 375 350
Notes:
1. An additional 60 to 90 feet of storage is typically provided in the taper area outside of the through lane, which is not reflected in the storage length above.
2. Bold indicates queue potentially extends beyond available storage.
Source: Fehr & Peers, February 2022.
Collision Data Review and Countermeasures
Fehr & Peers analyzed collision data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). The collision data reflects the most recent and complete three-year period (January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019). The study locations for this assessment were: Diamond
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Boulevard between Burnett Avenue and Galaxy Way; Diamond Boulevard between Galaxy Way to the Veranda/Seafood City driveway; and the Diamond Boulevard/ Galaxy Way intersection.
Over the three-year period, there were 10 total reported collisions. There were 4 injury collisions and 6 property damage collisions. There were no reported fatal collisions. Table 10 summarizes the collisions by the study segments and intersection on Diamond Boulevard.
Table 10: Collision by Study Area
Location Total Collisions Fatal/Injury
Collisions
Property Damage Only
Collisions
Diamond Boulevard (Burnett
Ave to Galaxy Way) 4 3 1
Diamond Boulevard (Galaxy
Way to The Veranda/Seafood
City Driveway)
4 0 4
Diamond Boulevard & Galaxy
Way 2 1 1
Total 10 4 6
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022, SWITRS.
Of reported collisions within the study area, six collisions were property damage only, three collisions were non-severe complaint of pain injury, and one collision was non-severe visible injury. There were no fatal or severe injury collisions within the study area in the three-year evaluation period. Table 11 summarizes the collision severity along the study segments and at the study intersection on Diamond Boulevard.
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Table 11: Collision by Severity
Location Total Fatal Injury
(Severe)
Injury
(Other
Visible)
Injury
(Complaint
of Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Diamond Boulevard
(Burnett Ave to Galaxy
Way)
4 0 0 1 2 1
Diamond Boulevard
(Galaxy Way to The
Veranda/Seafood City
Driveway)
4 0 0 0 0 4
Diamond Boulevard &
Galaxy Way 2 0 0 0 1 1
Total 10 0 0 1 3 6
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022, SWITRS.
Table 12 summarizes the collision types for the analysis segment and intersection.
Table 12: Collision by Type
Location Collision Type
Total HeadOn Sideswipe Rear End Broadside
Diamond Boulevard
(Burnett Ave to Galaxy
Way)
4 0 1 3 0
Diamond Boulevard
(Galaxy Way to The
Veranda/Seafood City
Driveway)
4 0 1 1 2
Diamond Boulevard &
Galaxy Way 2 1 0 0 1
Total 10 1 2 4 3
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022, SWITRS.
None of the reported collisions involved a bicyclist or pedestrian within the three-year evaluation period. Rear end collisions were the most common collision type with four rear-end collisions of the ten total collisions. Four of eight collisions that occurred along the study segments were rear end collisions. The study segments also had two sideswipe collisions and 2 broadside collisions.
The study intersection of Diamond Boulevard and Galaxy Way had one head-on collision and one broadside collision. All of the reported collisions in the study area involved multiple vehicles.
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Table 13 summarizes the primary collision factors for the study segments and at the study intersection.
Table 13: Collision by Primary Collision Factor
Location Total
Primary Collision Factor
Unsafe
Speed
Improper
Turning
Automobile
Right of
Way
Traffic
Signals and
Signs
Other
Hazardous
Violation
Unsafe
Starting/
Backing
Diamond Boulevard
(Burnett Ave to Galaxy
Way)
4 2 1 0 0 0 1
Diamond Boulevard
(Galaxy Way to The
Veranda/Seafood City
Driveway)
4 1 1 2 0 0 0
Diamond Boulevard &
Galaxy Way 2 0 0 0 1 1 0
Total 10 3 2 2 1 1 1
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022, SWITRS.
Unsafe speed was the most common collision factor sited as the primary factor for three of the ten total collisions. Three of eight collisions that occurred along the study segments were due to unsafe speed. The study segment of Diamond Boulevard between Burnett Avenue and Galaxy Way had two collisions due to unsafe speed, one collision due to improper turning, and one collision due to unsafe starting/backing. The study segment of Diamond Boulevard between Galaxy Way and The Veranda/Seafood City Driveway had one collision due to unsafe speed, one collision due to improper turning, and two collisions due to automobile right of way. The study intersection of Diamond Boulevard and Galaxy Way had one collision due to traffic signals and signs and one collision due to other hazardous violations. A collision map is provided in Figure 7.
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
CONCORD
PLEASANT
HILL
Diamond Blvd
Meridian Park Blvd
Burnett Ave
Galaxy Way
%&680
Collision Locations
Figure 7
WC21-3866_7_Collisions
Project Site Collision Type: Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Head-On
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Reported Collisions Compared to Predicted Collisions
The AASHTO Highway Safety Manual (HSM) includes a methodology to predict the number of collisions for a given location based on traffic volume, geometric characteristics, and operational characteristics. Fehr & Peers compared the reported collision (i.e., observed collisions) with the predicted number of collisions. Fehr & Peers calculated the predicted number of collisions using Safety Prediction Models for Six-Lane and One-Way Urban and Suburban Arterials. As defined above, the same segments and intersections identified in the quantitative collision analysis were analyzed using the predictive method:
• Diamond Boulevard between Burnett Avenue and Galaxy Way (Segment) • Diamond Boulevard between Galaxy Way and The Veranda/Seafood City Driveway (Segment)
• Diamond Boulevard and Galaxy Way (Intersection)
The number of collisions is presented as collisions per year. Using the model, the predicted number of collisions per year is 0.8 along both study segments of Diamond Boulevard between Burnett Avenue and Galaxy Way and Diamond Boulevard between Galaxy Way and The Veranda/Seafood City Driveway. The predicted number of collisions per year is 3.1 at the intersection of Diamond Boulevard and Galaxy Way. Based on the SWITRS collision data, there were four collisions over three years (1.3 collisions per year) along both study segments. There were two collisions over three years (0.7 collisions per year) at the study intersection.
Table 14 shows the reported and predicted collision frequencies at the study segments and intersections.
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Table 14: Actual versus Predicted Collision Frequencies Location Type1 AADT
(Major)
AADT
(Minor)
Actual
Collisions2 Predicted
Collision
Frequency
Difference3
Total Per
Year
Diamond Boulevard
(Burnett Ave to Galaxy
Way)
6D 11,549 - 4 1.3 0.8 0.5
Diamond Boulevard
(Galaxy Way to The
Veranda/Seafood City
Driveway)
6D 11,549 - 4 1.3 0.8 0.5
Diamond Boulevard &
Galaxy Way 4SG 11,549 3,580 2 0.7 3.1 -2.4
Notes:
1. 6D = 6 lane divided arterials; 4SG = 4 leg signalized intersection
2. Collision data obtained from SWIRTS for the segment and intersections between 2017 and 2019.
3. Negative values indicate that the actual collision frequency is less than the predicted collision frequency for a typical segment and intersection with similar attributes. Positive values indicate that the actual collision frequency is greater than the predicted collision frequency for a typical segment and intersection with similar attributes.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.
The data indicates that more collisions tend to occur within the study segments than would be expected at segments with similar characteristics. Data for the intersection shows that less collisions tend to occur within the study intersection than would be expected at intersections with similar characteristics.
Winnie Chung
April 25, 2022
Conclusions
The results of this transportation assessment indicate that operations of the intersections that would provide primary access to the Project site would not appreciably change with the addition of Project traffic. Vehicle queues would generally remain unchanged with the addition of Project traffic besides the westbound left-turn movement at Concord Avenue and Diamond Boulevard.
With the recommended improvement to retime the signal to add additional green time to the westbound left-turn movement, the increase in vehicle queues with the Project would be reduced below the City’s threshold for a detrimental project effect.
The assessment of historic collisions in the vicinity of the Project site found annual reported collisions above predicted values on roadways of similar design and volume. However, no fatal or severe injury collisions were reported. Based on the current findings, no countermeasures are recommended.
This completes our draft assessment of the Authentic Project. Please call Ryan at (925) 930-7100 with questions.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Kolaboration Concord, Trip Generation and VMT Screening Assessment Attachment B: Traffic Counts
Attachment C: LOS Calculation Worksheets
Attachment D: Queue Calculation Worksheets
Attachment A: Kolaboration Concord,
Trip Generation and VMT Screening
Assessment
100 Pringle Avenue | Suite 600 | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | (925) 930-7100 | Fax (925) 933-7090 www.fehrandpeers.com
Memorandum
Date: October 20, 2021
To: Winnie Chung, City of Concord
From: Mark Howard and Ryan McClain, Fehr & Peers
Subject: Kolaboration Concord, Trip Generation and VMT Screening Assessment WC21-3833
This memorandum presents the results of a trip generation and vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) screening assessment for the Kolaboration Concord, DBA CoCo Farms Project (Project) located at 2366 Stanwell Circle, Suite B, in the City of Concord. The project seeks to build out an existing 14,051 square foot building for use as a marijuana dispensary including retail, office, manufacturing and distribution. (See Figure 1 -all figures are provided at the end of this memorandum). Vehicular site access will be provided via three driveways along Stanwell Circle.
The following presents our approach, assumptions, and results.
Trip Generation Assessment
Trip generation refers to the process of estimating the amount of vehicular traffic a project might add to the local roadway network. Estimates are created for the peak one-hour periods during the weekday morning and evening commute hours, as well as the Saturday peak hour when traffic volumes on adjacent streets are typically at their highest and the project is expected to generate the most traffic.
Trip generation rates for various land uses based on a sampling of sites throughout the United States are published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition). However, given the limited number of sample sites collected for marijuana dispensary in the Trip Generation Manual, developing a trip generation rate based on local data is appropriate.
Therefore, trip generation estimates for the Project were calculated using driveway counts at another CoCo Farms site located at 3400 Wilbur Avenue, Antioch, California.
Peak hour driveway counts from the Antioch site are shown in Table 1. As shown below, the morning, evening and Saturday peak hours had 144, 262, and 272 trips, respectively.
Winnie Chung
October 20, 2021
Table 1: Observed Antioch CoCo Farms Peak Hour Trips
Weekday
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Peak Period In Out Total Peak Period In Out Total
7:00-8:00 AM 15 4 19 4:00-5:00 PM 125 137 262
7:15-8:15 AM 33 17 50 4:15-5:15 PM 120 129 249
7:30-8:30 AM 50 35 85 4:30-5:30 PM 121 130 251
7:45-8:45 AM 63 53 116 4:45-5:45 PM 123 121 244
8:00-9:00 AM 80 64 144 5:00-6:00 PM 122 117 239
Saturday
Peak Period In Out Total
10:00-11:00 AM 101 101 202
10:15-11:15 AM 90 95 185
10:30-11:30 AM 91 94 185
10:45-11:45 AM 97 93 190
11:00-12:00 PM 121 97 218
11:15-12:15 PM 143 113 256
11:30-12:30 PM 146 119 265
11:45-12:45 PM 147 125 272
12:00-1:00 PM 140 132 272
12:15-1:15 PM 132 129 261
12:30-1:30 PM 129 127 256
12:45-1:45 PM 129 122 251
1:00-2:00 PM 135 127 262
Bold indicates peak hour for each peak period
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021
The Antioch location consists of both a retail facility and a processing building. To calculate the trip rate for just the retail portion of the Antioch site, the trips associated with the processing building were subtracted out (using the ITE Manufacturing land use code 140), as shown in Table
2. The morning, evening and Saturday peak hour trips for the retail portion are 142, 260, and 271 trips, respectively.
Winnie Chung
October 20, 2021
Table 2: Antioch CoCo Farms Net Retail Trips
Use Size
(KSF)1
Weekday Saturday
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
Antioch CoCo Farms Total Peak Hour Trips4
Total Marijuana
Dispensary & Processing 80 64 144 125 137 262 140 132 272 Manufacturing Trip Generation2
Processing 2.7 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 0 1
Net Retail Peak Hour Trips3
Marijuana Dispensary 78 64 142 124 136 260 139 132 271
Notes:
1. KSF = 1,000 square feet
2. Manufacturing (Land use code 140), average rates, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, 2021.
3. Net Retail Peak Hour Trips = (Total Peak Hour Trips) – (Manufacturing Trip Generation)
4. Trips obtained from the Antioch location driveway counts.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021
Trip generation rates per retail employee were then calculated for the Antioch CoCo Farms site as shown in Table 3. Trip rates were produced on a per retail employee basis since the number of employees known and is directly related to the number of customers that can be served. Customers are the highest generator of trips for a retail land use.
Table 3: Observed Trip Generation Rates 1
Use Unit
Weekday Saturday
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Peak Hour
Rate In Out Rate In Out Rate In Out
Marijuana
Dispensary
Per
Employee 2.25 56% 44% 4.13 48% 52% 4.30 51% 49%
Notes:
1. Custom rates developed from CoCo Farms driveway count data, and 63 retail employees.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021
Trip generation estimates for the proposed Project are shown in Table 4. Based on the rates developed from the Antioch CoCo Farms location, the project is expected to generate 186 morning, 337 evening and 346 Saturday peak hour trips. The trip generation associated with the Antioch location is expected to be similar to the proposed Concord location. These trip generation rates are recommended for future analysis of marijuana dispensary uses to provide locally appropriate estimates.
Winnie Chung
October 20, 2021
Table 4: Concord Kolaboration Trip Generation Estimates Use Size
Weekday Saturday
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
Based on Observed and ITE 11th Edition Trip Generation Rates Marijuana
Dispensary1
80 Employees 101 79 180 159 172 331 175 169 344
Manufacturing3 7.5 KSF2 5 1 6 2 4 6 1 1 2
Total 106 80 186 161 176 337 176 170 346
Notes:
1. Estimate using custom rates developed from CoCo farms driveway count data and 80 Kolaboration retail employees (75 Budtenders, 4 Retail supervisors, 1 Retail Manager)
2. KSF = 1,000 square feet. Total KSF includes the office, manufacturing and distribution portions of the proposed Project.
3. Manufacturing (Land use code 140), average rates, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, 2021
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021
VMT Screening Assessment
With the passage of Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), the use of criteria such as auto delay, level of service, and similar measures of vehicle capacity of traffic congestion as the basis for determining significant impacts as part of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance was eliminated. SB 743 mandates the use of VMT in the evaluation and assessment of significant transportation impacts. In July 2020, Concord adopted VMT-based analysis methods which includes VMT metrics, thresholds, and screening criteria for evaluating a project’s VMT impact.
Based on the City thresholds and screening criteria, a project can be screened out from a formal VMT analysis if certain criteria are met that would signify that a project would be presumed to result in a less-than-significant CEQA Transportation section impact with respect to VMT. A project’s impact on VMT is considered less-than-significant and should not require further VMT analysis if the project meets at least one of the following criteria1:
Office/Industrial Uses
Fewer than 10,000 square feet
Located in a Transit Priority Area (TPA) and fewer than 200,000 square feet Located in a low employment VMT zone and fewer than 200,000 square feet 1 The screening criteria is based on the City of Concord’s thresholds adopted July, 2020.
Winnie Chung
October 20, 2021
Retail
Locally Serving2 and fewer than 30,000 square feet
Located in a TPA and fewer than 50,000 square feet
Project Screening
The proposed project consists of multiple uses within the project site, the breakdown of each use is shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Kolaboration Proposed Project Building Areas
Use Size (SF)
Retail 6,532
Office 2,452
Manufacturing 1,669
Distribution 3,399
Total 14,052
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021
The following breaks down the VMT screening by the proposed project uses.
Retail
As shown in Table 5, the total square footage of the retail portion of the proposed project is 6,532 square feet, which is less than the 30,000 square foot threshold for a retail use not located in a TPA. Additionally, the project may be considered locally serving based on the proximity of nearby dispensaries and the context of the Project. Velvet Cannabis Dispensary, located on 4808 Sunrise Drive, Martinez, California is roughly 2.2 miles away, and the retail portion is expected to serve nearby residents. Therefore, the proposed retail portion of the project satisfies the Cityestablished screening criteria for a locally-serving retail use and may be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact without further analysis.
Office/Industrial Uses
As shown in Figure 2 the proposed project is located in a low employment VMT zone. As shown in Table 5, the total square footage of the office, manufacturing and distribution areas is 7,520 square feet, which is less than the 200,000 square foot threshold for an office/industrial use located in a low employment VMT zone. Therefore, the proposed office/industrial portion of the 2 Locally serving uses are generally fewer than 30,000 square feet and tend to serve the immediate community surrounding the project site, such as a coffee shop, drycleaners, convenience markets, and tutoring centers. If there are similar uses within a three-mile radius, the use may also be locally serving. The final determination of whether a particular project is a local serving use shall rest with the City.
Winnie Chung
October 20, 2021
project satisfies the City-established screening criteria for an office/industrial use located in a low employment VMT zone and may be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact without further analysis.
Conclusion
Based on the trip generation assessment using the Antioch site trip generation rates, the project is expected to generate 186 morning, 337 evening and 346 Saturday peak hour trips. Based on City of Concord’s Transportation Analysis Guidelines, adopted July 2020, and the trip generation assessment, a local transportation analysis is required. A separate proposal describing the additional scope of work has been prepared.
From the VMT screening assessment, the proposed project meets the City’s screening criteria for both the retail and office/industrial uses, and therefore is presumed to have a less-thansignificant impact on VMT.
This concludes our trip generation and VMT screening assessment findings. Please contact Mark Howard or Ryan McClain with questions or comments.
Attachments
Figure 1: Proposed Project Site Plan
Figure 2: Low Employment VMT Areas
Project Site Plan
Figure 1
WC21-3833_1_SitePlan
Site Plan Source: Studio Benavente Architects, 9/23/21
Concord Commute Based VMT per Worker, 2018
Figure
WC14\OK14-0024.08_Concord_VMT
Areas Not Applicable for Screening:
TAZs with less than 30 jobs in 2020
Transit Priority Areas (TPAs):
less than 1/2 mi away from rail stations
^
N
VMT per Worker:
at least 15% below Bay Area regional average
20 Project Site
Low Employment VMT Areas
Figure 2
WC21-3833_2_LowEmpVMT Page 166 of 607
Attachment B: Turning Movement
Counts
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080010-003 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1383 0 852
0 0 0 0 1 178 0 161
0 0 0 0 TEV 2446 0 3897 0 4 0 3
698 0 877 2 PHF 0.92 0.97
370 0 583 1 0 2 0 1
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 679 0 193 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 218 0 144 AM
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 0
Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 1/6/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
COUNT PERIODS
NONE
1074 0 845
Cars (AM) 761 HT (AM)
Concord Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Concord Ave
1070 0 2062
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 531
NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOON
AM
AMNOON
PM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
40 000
3 0
0 1
0 0
0 00
0 00 0
0 13
8 0
6 0
000
9 0
2 0
0 0 0
0 0
000
000
0 33
11 1
19 0
0 0
0 7
0 3
0 1370
575 178
871
0 000
670
0 191
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 819
359 160
679
0 000
2110141
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-001 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 0 000
3 0 1252 0
000 01 0 219 0
000 0 TEV 0 4241 0 0 030
0 911 0 3 PHF 0.95
0 809 0 1 0201
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 0 774 0 273 NOON
AM 0000 AM
0 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
01:00 PM - 02:00 PM
0 1187 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Concord Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Concord Ave
0 2026 0
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
1028
0 NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00 0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 00 0 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 8
6 1
9 0
000
502
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 1244
803 218
902
0 000
7690271
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080010-005 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 2 1 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 18 7 5 0 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 6 0 5
3 1407 0 937
1 0 8 0 1 108 0 102
7 0 5 1 TEV 2021 0 2872 0 12 0 1
734 0 984 2.5 PHF 0.90 0.96
98 0 70 0.5 0 1.5 0.5 1
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 133 1 108 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 69 4 60 AM
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 12
Meridian Park Blvd & Concord Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Meridian Park Blvd Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 1/6/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 16 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
COUNT PERIODS
NONE
1109 0 795
Cars (AM) 185 HT (AM)
Concord Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Concord Ave
1009 0 1566
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 201
NORTHBOUND
Meridian Park Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOON
AM
AMNOON
PM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
50 010
3 1
0 0
2 0
0 00
0 00 0
0 11
0 0
8 0
000
2 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
000
000
0 31
5 5
17 0
0 0
0 2
0 5
6 1396
70 108
976
5 1875
131
1 108
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
5 906
93 97
717
7 210
67455
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-002 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 40 6 18 0 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0100 0 0 12 0
3 0 1309 0
080 01 0 171 0
0 21 0 1 TEV 0 2985 0 0 0 11 0
0 941 0 2.5 PHF 0.93
0 131 0 0.5 0 1.5 0.5 1
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 0 183 9 125 NOON
AM 0000 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
308
0 NORTHBOUND
Meridian Park Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
12:00 PM - 01:00 PM
0 1095 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Concord Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Concord Ave
0 1540 0
CONTROL
Signalized
42 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
Meridian Park Blvd & Concord Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Meridian Park Blvd Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 50 0 4
0 0
3 0
0 1
0 0 00 0 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 8
0 0
4 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
12 1301
131 171
937
21 40618
1839125
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080010-006 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 25 6 8 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 96 12 35 0 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1 1 1 0 1 27 0 31
3 1332 0 998
0 0 1 0 1 148 0 201
48 0 67 1 TEV 2191 0 3099 0 1 0 0
663 0 922 3 PHF 0.87 0.96
60 0 60 0 0 1 1 1
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 117 20 261 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 29 16 106 AM
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 114
John Glenn Dr & Concord Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
John Glenn Dr Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 1/6/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 95 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
COUNT PERIODS
NONE
1219 0 777
Cars (AM) 220 HT (AM)
Concord Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Concord Ave
1052 0 1546
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 267
NORTHBOUND
John Glenn Dr
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOON
AM
AMNOON
PM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
5 0
0 1
0 2
10 020
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 10
0 00 2
3 10
0 4
7 1
001
1 0
2 0
0 0 0
0 0
000
000
1 33
0 5
19 2
4 0
2 1
1 3
24 1322
60 144
915
66 961234
116
20 259
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
30 965
60 196
644
46 2166
2815103
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-003 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 117 21 22 0 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1110 1 0 29 0
3 0 1283 0
0 12 0 01 0 195 0
0 124 0 1 TEV 0 3122 0 0 030
0 896 0 3 PHF 0.98
0 55 0 0 0111
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 0 88 28 249 NOON
AM 0000 AM
181 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
John Glenn Dr & Concord Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
John Glenn Dr Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
12:45 PM - 01:45 PM
0 1170 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Concord Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Concord Ave
0 1500 0
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
271
0 NORTHBOUND
John Glenn Dr
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 40 0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 10 0 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 7
1 0
7 0
000
001
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
29 1276
54 195
889
124
1172122
8828248
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080010-011 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 631 96 670 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 456 37 616 0 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1.5 0.5 2 0 1 191 0 140
3 864 0 857
0 0 0 0 1 78 0 76
0 0 0 0 TEV 3165 0 4005 0 1 0 0
539 0 1456 3 PHF 0.89 0.96
35 0 36 0 0 1 1 1
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 31 53 186 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 19 30 72 AM
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 244
Commerce Ave/SR 242 Ramps & Concord Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Commerce Ave/SR 242 Ramps Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 1/6/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 170 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
COUNT PERIODS
NONE
2259 0 1281
Cars (AM) 151 HT (AM)
Concord Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Concord Ave
1507 0 1351
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 207
NORTHBOUND
Commerce Ave/SR 242 Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOON
AM
AMNOON
PM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 1
0 1
10 220
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 20
0 00 2
0 25
2 2
11 0
20412
0 1
1 0
0 0 0
0 0
000
000
2 33
7 1
39 0
17 2
12 1
3 5
191
839
34 76
1445
0 43633604
31 52
185
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
138
824
28 75
500
0 61494658
182767
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-004 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 787 57 876 0 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1.5 0.5 2 0 1 0 200 0
3 0 944 0
000 01 0 64 0
000 0 TEV 0 4160 0 0 000
0 1082 0 3 PHF 0.97
0 18 0 0 0111
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 0 20 20 92 NOON
AM 0000 AM
220 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
Commerce Ave/SR-242 Ramp & Concord Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Commerce Ave/SR-242 Ramp Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
11:00 AM - 12:00 PM
0 2050 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Concord Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Concord Ave
0 1751 0
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
139
0 NORTHBOUND
Commerce Ave/SR-242 Ramp
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 3
0 0
2 0
0 60 0 21
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 00 0 20
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
3 6
0 0
10 0
519
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
197
938
18 64
1072
0 78256867
202092
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080010-012 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0 0 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 0 0 0 0 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 0 0 0 1.5 207 0 349
2.5 899 0 940
0 0 0 0 1 41 0 64
0 0 0 0 TEV 2984 0 3767 0 13 0 4
640 0 1269 3 PHF 0.88 0.97
476 0 555 2 0 2 1.5 0.5
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 218 462 103 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 137 311 63 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 540
NORTHBOUND
Market St/SR 242 Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
1385 0 707
Cars (AM) 596 HT (AM)
Concord Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Concord Ave
1077 0 1117
CONTROL
Signalized
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 669
Market St/SR 242 Ramps & Concord Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Market St/SR 242 Ramps Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 1/6/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 660 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
COUNT PERIODS
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOON
AM
AMNOON
PM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 000
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 00
0 00 0
2 13
6 0
11 0
000
7 6
2 0
0 0 0
0 0
000
000
17 27
14 2
31 0
0 0
0 9
10 10
205
886
549 41
1258
0 000
211
456
101
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
332
913
462 62
609
0 000
12830153
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-005 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 1.5 0 519 0
2.5 0 921 0
000 01 0 46 0
000 0 TEV 0 4039 0 0 0 25 0
0 1178 0 3 PHF 0.98
0 529 0 0 0 2 1.5 0.5
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 0 253 487 81 NOON
AM 0000 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
575
0 NORTHBOUND
Market St/SR-242
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
01:00 PM - 02:00 PM
0 1284 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Concord Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Concord Ave
0 1174 0
CONTROL
Signalized
1006 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
Market St/SR-242 & Concord Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Market St/SR-242 Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 40 0 5
0 0
1 0
0 2
0 0 00 0 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
7 5
4 0
8 0
000
330
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
512
916
525 46
1170
0 000
25048481
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080010-004 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 192 258 24 3 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 238 525 17 6 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 3 1 0 0 31 0 18
2 39 0 17
9 0 8 0 1 25 0 9
271 0 385 2 TEV 1241 0 2084 0 0 0 2
173 0 117 1 PHF 0.95 0.97
67 0 105 1 0 1 3 0
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 166 396 26 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 52 121 25 AM
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 818
Diamond Blvd & Burnett Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 1/6/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM 413 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
COUNT PERIODS
NONE
160 0 224
Cars (AM) 655 HT (AM)
Burnett Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Burnett Ave
270 0 451
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 334
NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOON
AM
AMNOON
PM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
8 0
2 1
0 5
10 000
1 1
0 1
0 0
1 00
1 20 0
0 0
0 0
3 10
630
1 3
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
000
000
0 2
3 0
3 8
3 5
2 2
5 0
31 39
105 25
114
375
23252217
165
393
26 0
0 0 0
0 0
000
000
18 15
64 9
170
263
18925322
5011625
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-006 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 353 619 26 6 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1210 0 0 26 0
2 0 37 0
0 10 0 01 0 25 0
0 480 0 2 TEV 0 2769 0 0 010
0 146 0 1 PHF 0.95
0 201 0 1 0130
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 0 271 512 56 NOON
AM 0000 AM
1024 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
Diamond Blvd & Burnett Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
01:00 PM - 02:00 PM
0 229 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Burnett Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Burnett Ave
0 671 0
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
845
0 NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 3
0 0
4 0
0 00 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 00 0 10
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
1 3
240
040
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
26 37
201 25
145
477
35161526
27150856
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-007 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 151 525 47 7 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0310 0.5 66 0 0
0.5 18 0 0
000 02 77 0 0
0 0 135 2 TEV 0 0 1599 0 500
0 0 25 0.5 PHF 0.94
0 0 32 0.5 0130
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 32 16 426 37 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0000 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0
NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
114 0 0
Cars (AM) 666 HT (AM)
Galaxy Way
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Galaxy Way
0 0 185
CONTROL
Signalized
0 NONE
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 634
Diamond Blvd & Galaxy Way
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/10/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
3 0
0 0
0 0
20 0 0 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 00 0 0 0 1
3 2
2 2
0 1
110
110
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
63 16
30 75
25 134
15052447
1542537
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-007 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 194 659 40 6 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0310 0.5 0 82 0
0.5 0 14 0
010 02 0 86 0
0 184 0 2 TEV 0 1968 0 0 020
0 25 0 0.5 PHF 0.96
0 54 0 0.5 0130
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 26 14 531 50 NOON
AM 0000 AM
803 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
Diamond Blvd & Galaxy Way
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
12:45 PM - 01:45 PM
0 117 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Galaxy Way
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Galaxy Way
0 223 0
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
825
0 NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 5
0 0
5 0
0 20 0 3
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0 00 0 10
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
030
040
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
82 14
54 86
25 184
19465640
1452750
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-008 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 131 399 44 22 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0310 0 51 0 0
1 400
001 00 51 0 0
0 0 137 1.5 TEV 0 0 1582 0 000
0 0 13 0.5 PHF 0.96
0 0 154 1 0220
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 7 330 229 9 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0000 AM
0 NONE
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM 439
Diamond Blvd & The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/10/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
NONE
66 0 0
Cars (AM) 611 HT (AM)
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
0 0 466
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0
NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
2 0
0 4
0 0
00 0 0 0
0 4
0 0
6 0
0 10 0 0 0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
031
030
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
51 4
154 51
13 137
13139643
3302269
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-008 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 160 457 71 35 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0310 0 0 88 0
1 0 16 0
010 00 0 53 0
0 173 0 1.5 TEV 0 2071 0 0 000
0 23 0 0.5 PHF 0.93
0 229 0 1 0220
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 2 418 333 12 NOON
AM 0000 AM
629 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
Diamond Blvd & The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
01:00 PM - 02:00 PM
0 106 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy
0 595 0
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
741
0 NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 1
0 0
5 0
0 20 0 9
0 0
2 0
0 3
0 0 30 0 10
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 1
031
041
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
88 16
229 53
23 172
16045470
41832911
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080052-001 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 21 210 10 6 AM
NOON 76 508 12 8 NOON
PM 56 597 11 9 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0310 0.5 15 9 6
0.5 7 12 3
000 02 174 226 175
17 76 67 1 TEV 874 1725 1717 0 000
1 15 9 0.5 PHF 0.91 0.96 1.00
16 62 56 0.5 0130
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 2 40 535 139 PM
NOON 3 31 500 187 NOON
AM 0 18 219 172 AM
593 12:00 PM - 02:00 PM
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM 626
Diamond Blvd & Willow Way
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/10/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
08:00 AM - 09:00 AM 248 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
COUNT PERIODS
12:00 PM - 01:00 PM
159 214 183
Cars (AM) 829 HT (AM)
Willow Way
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Willow Way
42 119 103
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
799
401
NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
1 2
3 5
0 2
00000
1 3
4 0
3 6
0 320226
0 0
0 2
0 0
031
020
0 0
1 3
0 0
181
033
0 0
1 5
0 2
290
065
15 7
56 172
9 67
5659410
40533139
9 12
61 223
15 76
7550011
31497184
6 3
15 170
1 15
1920110
18213167
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080052-001 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 124 682 16 10 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0310 0.5 0 25 0
0.5 0 14 0
000 02 0 254 0
0 118 0 1 TEV 0 2353 0 0 000
0 15 0 0.5 PHF 0.96
0 106 0 0.5 0130
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 7 66 676 240 NOON
AM 0000 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
1049
0 NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
01:00 PM - 02:00 PM
0 271 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Willow Way
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Willow Way
0 204 0
CONTROL
Signalized
829 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
Diamond Blvd & Willow Way
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 10 0 1
0 0
4 0
0 1
0 0 00 0 30
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 2
0 0
040
152
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
25 14
106 252
15 118
12467816
65671238
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080052-002 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 33 364 3 0 AM
NOON 79 721 1 0 NOON
PM 69 788 1 0 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0310 0 427
1 112
000 00 764
9 68 60 0.5 TEV 944 1851 1874 0 000
030 0.5 PHF 0.90 0.96 0.97
35 78 50 1 0230
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 36 213 635 10 PM
NOON 18 218 654 2 NOON
AM 13 77 393 4 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
823
416
NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
12:00 PM - 01:00 PM
11 6 7
Cars (AM) 881 HT (AM)
The Willows/Hilton Concord Dwy
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
The Willows/Hilton Concord Dwy
112 298 283
CONTROL
Signalized
724 12:00 PM - 02:00 PM
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 699
Diamond Blvd & The Willows/Hilton Concord Dwy
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/10/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
08:00 AM - 09:00 AM 409 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
COUNT PERIODS
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
1 2
1 0
0 1
00001
0 2
4 3
4 7
0 410105
0 0
0 0
0 1
040
230
0 0
0 0
1 1
1110
350
0 0
1 0
0 0
1140
1110
4 1
50 7
0 59
697841
21163210
2 1
78 6
2 67
787101
2156492
7 2
34 4
0 9
323503
763824
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080052-002 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 77 966 1 0 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0310 0 000
1 000
000 00 000
0 86 0 0.5 TEV 0 2473 0 0 000
000 0.5 PHF 0.97
0 107 0 1 0230
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 22 312 899 3 NOON
AM 0000 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
1095
0 NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
01:00 PM - 02:00 PM
040
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
The Willows/Hilton Concord Dwy
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
The Willows/Hilton Concord Dwy
0 389 0
CONTROL
Signalized
985 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
Diamond Blvd & The Willows/Hilton Concord Dwy
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 00 0 0
0 0
9 0
0 2
0 0 00 0 20
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 1
050
170
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
107 0
0 85
779611
3118923
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-009 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 1 420 0 0
3 1038 0 0
000 00 000
0 0 508 2 TEV 0 0 4171 0 000
0 0 1673 2 PHF 0.96
000 0 0 1.5 0.5 2
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 290 2 240 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0000 AM
0 NONE
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 930
I-680 NB Ramps & Willow Pass Rd
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
I-680 NB Ramps Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/10/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
NONE
1913 0 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Willow Pass Rd
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Willow Pass Rd
0 0 1328
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0
NORTHBOUND
I-680 NB Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
10 0 0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 40 0 0 0 5
2 5
0 0
16 14
000
501
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
418
1033
0 0
1657
494
000
2852239
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-009 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0000 1 0 387 0
3 0 1324 0
000 00 000
0 540 0 2 TEV 0 4534 0 0 000
0 1322 0 2 PHF 0.94
000 0 0 1.5 0.5 2
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 0 474 4 483 NOON
AM 0000 AM
931 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
I-680 NB Ramps & Willow Pass Rd
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
I-680 NB Ramps Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
01:00 PM - 02:00 PM
0 1805 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Willow Pass Rd
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Willow Pass Rd
0 1798 0
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0
NORTHBOUND
I-680 NB Ramps
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 10 0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0 60 0 50
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
1 8
0 0
10 7
000
300
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
386
1316
0 0
1312
533
000
4714483
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-010 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 479 41 403 0 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
2120 1 371 0 0
3 838 0 0
000 02 52 0 0
0 0 442 2 TEV 0 0 4341 0 21 0 0
0 0 1309 3 PHF 0.98
0 0 69 1 0221
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 1 178 50 87 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0000 AM
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0
NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
NONE
1820 0 0
Cars (AM) 163 HT (AM)
Willow Pass Rd
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Willow Pass Rd
0 0 1495
CONTROL
Signalized
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 863
Diamond Blvd & Willow Pass Rd
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/10/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
10 0 0 0
2 3
0 0
1 0
0 20 0 0 0 5
2 6
0 2
12 0
003
210
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
369
832
69 50
1297
442
47941400
1764987
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-010 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 738 47 399 0 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
2120 1 0 441 0
3 0 730 0
000 02 0 87 0
0 704 0 2 TEV 0 4491 0 0 0 23 0
0 881 0 3 PHF 0.98
0 120 0 1 0221
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 2 157 78 84 NOON
AM 0000 AM
1223 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
Diamond Blvd & Willow Pass Rd
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Diamond Blvd Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
12:15 PM - 01:15 PM
0 1387 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Willow Pass Rd
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Willow Pass Rd
0 1625 0
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
256
0 NORTHBOUND
Diamond Blvd
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00 0 1
0 0
2 0
0 1
0 0 50 0 70
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
4 3
1 0
5 2
302
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
437
727
119 87
876
702
73547397
1577884
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-011 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 114 2 99 0 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1120 0 19 0 0
3 1077 0 0
007 01 28 0 0
0 0 46 2 TEV 0 0 3339 0 22 0 0
0 0 1702 3 PHF 0.95
0 0 18 1 0211
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 85 4 116 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0000 AM
0 NONE
04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 69
Franquette Ave & Willow Pass Rd
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Franquette Ave Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 2/10/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
NONE
1939 0 0
Cars (AM) 48 HT (AM)
Willow Pass Rd
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Willow Pass Rd
0 0 1283
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 0
NORTHBOUND
Franquette Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
0 5
0 0
10 0 0 0
7 1
0 0
0 0
0 80 0 0 0 7
2 10
0 0
15 1
001
100
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
17 1067
18 28
1687
45 114298
844116
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080051-011 Day:
City: Concord Date:
AM 0000 AM
NOON 45 0 19 0 NOON
PM 0000 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1120 0 0 22 0
3 0 1214 0
0 17 0 01 0 26 0
0 43 0 2 TEV 0 2716 0 0 0 14 0
0 1233 0 3 PHF 0.97
0 14 0 1 0211
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0000 PM
NOON 0 30 1 38 NOON
AM 0000 AM
66 11:00 AM - 02:00 PM
NONE 0
Franquette Ave & Willow Pass Rd
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Franquette Ave Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 2/12/2022
PEAK HOURS
NONE
NONE 0 NONE
COUNT PERIODS
11:45 AM - 12:45 PM
0 1304 0
Cars (AM) 0 HT (AM)
Willow Pass Rd
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Willow Pass Rd
0 1306 0
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
40 0
NORTHBOUND
Franquette Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 00 0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 80 0 60
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 10
0 0
12 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
22 1204
14 26
1221
43 45019
30138
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Market Street/Pine St & Willow Pass Rd
City: Concord Project ID:
Control: Signalized Date:
NS/EW Streets: Explanation for extra leg movements
2 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 2 2.5 1.5 0 0 0 2.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 Movements entering the extra leg NL NT NR NU NU2 SL ST SR SU ST2 EL ET ER EU ER2 WL WT WR WU WL2 N2L2 N2T2 TOTAL 4:00 PM 108 110 45 0 2 17 86 46 0 21 26 274 56 1 39 0 109 4 0 0 0 0 944 WL2 Movements coming from WB on Willow Pass Rd entering into the Extra Leg (Pine St)4:15 PM 78 95 41 0 4 7 68 34 0 20 41 345 79 3 65 0 170 4 0 0 0 0 1054 ST2 Movements coming from SB on Market St entering into the Extra Leg (Pine St)4:30 PM 113 122 52 0 0 23 95 49 0 25 37 281 89 2 42 0 114 7 0 0 0 0 1051 ER2 Movements coming from EB on Willow Pass Rd entering into the Extra Leg (Pine St)4:45 PM 87 97 34 0 1 13 76 46 0 19 33 338 78 2 47 0 137 9 0 0 0 0 1017 NU2 Movements coming from NB on Market St entering into the Extra Leg (Pine St)5:00 PM 90 135 34 0 2 11 92 44 0 21 53 298 84 1 34 0 126 9 0 0 0 0 1034 5:15 PM 88 111 51 0 1 14 89 40 0 26 41 376 76 0 48 0 101 4 0 0 0 0 1066 Movements exiting the extra leg 5:30 PM 112 142 52 0 2 13 74 24 0 21 34 289 89 0 43 0 123 3 0 0 0 0 10215:45 PM 98 104 31 0 3 8 57 29 0 22 30 283 67 1 45 0 143 0 0 0 0 0 921 N2T2 Movements exiting from Extra Leg (Pine St) entering into Market St heading NB N2L2 Movements exiting from Extra Leg (Pine St) entering into Willow Pass Rd heading WB NL NT NR NU NU2 SL ST SR SU ST2 EL ET ER EU ER2 WL WT WR WU WL2 N2L2 N2T2 TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 774 916 340 0 15 106 637 312 0 175 295 2484 618 10 363 0 1023 40 0000 8108 APPROACH %'s : 37.85% 44.79% 16.63% 0.00% 0.73% 8.62% 51.79% 25.37% 0.00% 14.23% 7.82% 65.89% 16.39% 0.27% 9.63% 0.00% 96.24% 3.76% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 4:30 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 378 465 171 0 4 61 352 179 0 91 164 1293 327 5 171 0 478 29 0000 4168 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.836 0.861 0.822 0.000 0.500 0.663 0.926 0.913 0.000 0.875 0.774 0.860 0.919 0.625 0.891 0.000 0.872 0.806 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
0.977 0.887 0.889 0.906 0.868
PM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
22-080051-0122/10/2022
Data - Total
Market Street/Pine St Market Street/Pine St Willow Pass Rd Willow Pass Rd
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Market St/Pine St & Willow Pass Rd
City: Concord Project ID:
Control: Signalized Date:
NS/EW Streets:
Explanation for extra leg movements
2 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 2 2.5 1.5 0 0 0 2.5 0.5 0 0 0 0
NL NT NR NU NU2 SL ST SR SU ST2 EL ET ER EU ER2 WL WT WR WU WL2 N2L2 N2R2 TOTAL Movements entering the extra leg 11:00 AM 96 94 26 0 1 6 102 53 0 8 35 185 68 0 23 0 172 12 0 0 0 0 88111:15 AM 99 129 34 0 3 8 113 51 0 9 25 177 62 0 33 0 162 9 0 0 0 0 914 ST2 Movements coming from SB on Market St/Pine St entering into the Extra Leg (Pine St)11:30 AM 107 122 23 0 1 9 52 43 0 16 26 166 58 0 30 0 172 10 0 0 0 0 835 ER2 Movements coming from EB on Willow Pass Rd entering into the Extra Leg (Pine St)11:45 AM 115 143 29 0 4 6 91 43 0 17 36 184 47 0 30 0 164 10 0 0 0 0 919 WL2 Movements coming from WB on Willow Pass Rd entering into the Extra Leg (Pine St) 12:00 PM 100 136 29 0 2 11 78 47 0 7 36 210 61 0 33 0 170 11 0 0 0 0 931 NU2 Movements coming from NB on Market St/Pine St entering into the Extra Leg (Pine St)12:15 PM 108 119 49 0 3 12 84 59 0 24 34 175 58 0 29 0 170 10 0 0 0 0 93412:30 PM 104 112 31 0 4 10 61 36 0 19 40 224 74 3 39 0 159 15 0 0 0 0 931 Movements exiting the extra leg12:45 PM 102 115 34 0 1 13 73 47 0 26 25 216 62 0 28 0 177 10 0 0 0 0 929 1:00 PM 93 129 27 0 1 12 74 48 0 14 46 196 73 2 34 0 184 14 0 0 0 0 947 N2L2 Movements exiting from Extra Leg (Pine St) entering into Willow Pass Rd heading WB 1:15 PM 112 121 39 0 5 8 93 41 0 20 36 177 61 2 29 0 158 10 0 0 0 0 912 N2R2 Movements exiting from Extra Leg (Pine St) entering into Willow Pass Rd heading EB1:30 PM 87 111 29 0 3 6 81 32 0 14 47 214 64 1 40 0 171 9 0 0 0 1 910 1:45 PM 125 145 44 0 6 9 73 43 0 17 33 199 74 1 29 0 154 13 0 0 0 0 965 NL NT NR NU NU2 SL ST SR SU ST2 EL ET ER EU ER2 WL WT WR WU WL2 N2L2 N2R2 TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 1248 1476 394 0 34 110 975 543 0 191 419 2323 762 9 377 0 2013 133 0001 11008 APPROACH %'s : 39.59% 46.83% 12.50% 0.00% 1.08% 6.05% 53.60% 29.85% 0.00% 10.50% 10.77% 59.72% 19.59% 0.23% 9.69% 0.00% 93.80% 6.20% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% PEAK HR : 12:15 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 407 475 141 0 9 47 292 190 0 83 145 811 267 5 130 0 690 49 0 0 0 0 3741 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.942 0.921 0.719 0.000 0.563 0.904 0.869 0.805 0.000 0.798 0.788 0.905 0.902 0.417 0.833 0.000 0.938 0.817 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 22-080051-0122/12/2022
Data - Total
Market St/Pine St Market St/Pine St Willow Pass Rd Willow Pass Rd NOON
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
12:15 PM - 01:15 PM
0.988 0.925 0.855 0.893 0.933
Attachment C: LOS Calculation
Worksheets
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave Existing PM
Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 877 583 182 1376 679 193
Future Volume (veh/h) 877 583 182 1376 679 193
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 904 0 188 1419 700 36
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333
Cap, veh/h 2709 212 3468 828 380
Arrive On Green 0.53 0.00 0.12 0.68 0.24 0.24
Sat Flow, veh/h 5233 1572 1767 5233 3428 1572
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 904 0 188 1419 700 36
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1689 1572 1767 1689 1714 1572
Q Serve(g_s), s 13.6 0.0 14.1 16.6 26.3 2.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.6 0.0 14.1 16.6 26.3 2.4
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 2709 212 3468 828 380
V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.89 0.41 0.85 0.09
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2709 262 3468 1244 571
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.70 0.70
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.8 0.0 58.5 9.3 48.8 39.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 20.7 0.1 3.2 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.3 0.0 7.5 5.6 11.5 0.9
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.1 0.0 79.2 9.4 52.0 39.9
LnGrp LOS B E A D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 904 A 1607 736
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.1 17.6 51.4
Approach LOS B B D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.2 77.2 37.6 97.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 52.0 49.0 76.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.1 15.6 28.3 18.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 10.1 4.3 21.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.4
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Meridian Park Blvd & Concord Ave Existing PM
Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 984 70 120 1407 6 133 1 108 5 7 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 984 70 120 1407 6 133 1 108 5 7 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 1025 0 125 1466 6 140 00570
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 43 3454 147 3858 16 234 0 18 26 0
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.68 0.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 5233 0 1767 5207 21 3534 0 1572 757 1060 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 14 1025 0 125 951 521 140 0 0 12 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1689 0 1767 1689 1852 1767 0 1572 1818 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 10.9 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 10.9 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 0.42 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 43 3454 147 2502 1372 234 0 44 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.30 0.85 0.38 0.38 0.60 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 288 3454 209 2502 1372 288 0 431 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 64.8 8.6 0.0 55.5 0.0 0.0 61.3 0.0 0.0 64.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 0.2 0.0 13.8 0.1 0.2 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 3.7 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.1 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 66.3 8.8 0.0 69.2 0.1 0.2 62.2 0.0 0.0 65.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A EAAEA EAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 1039 A 1597 140 A 12
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.5 5.6 62.2 65.9
Approach LOS AAEE
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.2 97.6 14.0 7.3 105.5 8.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 56.5 11.0 22.0 50.5 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.3 12.9 7.2 3.1 2.0 2.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.4 0.1 0.0 20.5 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.2
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: John Glenn Dr & Concord Ave Existing PM
Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 68 922 60 149 1320 27 117 20 261 35 12 96 Future Volume (veh/h) 68 922 60 149 1320 27 117 20 261 35 12 96 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 71 960 59 155 1375 0 122 21 24 36 12 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 110 3325 204 178 3648 196 205 171 187 205 171 Arrive On Green 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 4879 299 1767 5066 1572 1360 1856 1547 1331 1856 1547 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 71 664 355 155 1375 0 122 21 24 36 12 8 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1689 1801 1767 1689 1572 1360 1856 1547 1331 1856 1547 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.2 0.0 0.0 11.5 0.0 0.0 11.9 1.4 1.9 3.4 0.8 0.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 0.0 0.0 11.5 0.0 0.0 12.7 1.4 1.9 4.8 0.8 0.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 110 2301 1227 178 3648 196 205 171 187 205 171 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.29 0.29 0.87 0.38 0.62 0.10 0.14 0.19 0.06 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 236 2301 1227 367 3648 398 481 401 385 481 401 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 57.7 0.0 0.0 53.1 0.0 0.0 59.4 54.0 54.2 56.2 53.8 53.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.1 0.2 4.7 0.3 0.0 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 0.0 0.1 4.8 0.1 0.0 4.2 0.7 0.8 1.2 0.4 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.0 0.1 0.2 57.8 0.3 0.0 60.6 54.1 54.4 56.3 53.8 53.7 LnGrp LOS EAAEA EDDEDD
Approach Vol, veh/h 1090 1530 A 167 56
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.0 6.1 58.9 55.4
Approach LOS AAEE
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.4 102.7 19.9 17.6 97.5 19.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 67.5 35.0 28.0 57.5 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.2 2.0 14.7 13.5 2.0 6.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 21.3 0.3 0.2 12.2 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.4
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Commerce Ave/SR 242 & Concord Ave Existing PM
Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1456 36 79 864 191 31 53 186 616 37 456 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1456 36 79 864 191 31 53 186 616 37 456 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1517 36 82 900 0 32 55 0 642 108 85 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 033333333333
Cap, veh/h 0 2336 55 125 3132 113 119 101 717 376 319
Arrive On Green 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.62 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 4973 107 1767 5233 0 1767 1856 1572 3534 1856 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 936 617 82 900 0 32 55 0 642 108 85 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1392 1833 1767 1689 0 1767 1856 1572 1767 1856 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 11.1 0.0 2.3 3.9 0.0 23.9 6.7 6.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 11.1 0.0 2.3 3.9 0.0 23.9 6.7 6.1 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.06 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1442 949 125 3132 113 119 101 717 376 319 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.66 0.29 0.28 0.46 0.00 0.90 0.29 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1442 949 196 3132 170 179 151 969 509 431 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 61.1 12.0 0.0 60.2 60.9 0.0 52.4 45.5 45.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 2.1 3.1 2.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 7.1 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.4 0.8 2.8 4.0 0.0 1.1 1.9 0.0 11.1 3.1 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 2.1 3.1 63.3 12.0 0.0 60.7 62.0 0.0 59.5 45.7 45.5 LnGrp LOS AAAEB EEAEDD
Approach Vol, veh/h 1553 982 A 87 835
Approach Delay, s/veh 2.5 16.3 61.5 56.3
Approach LOS ABEE
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.5 75.4 13.7 89.0 32.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 50.5 13.0 69.5 37.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.1 2.0 5.9 13.1 25.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 22.3 0.1 10.9 1.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.9
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.
User approved changes to right turn type.
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Market St & Concord Ave Existing PM
Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1269 555 54 899 207 218 462 103 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1269 555 54 899 207 218 462 103 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1308 520 56 927 126 225 476 106
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 033333333
Cap, veh/h 0 2238 882 115 4030 1115 667 558 123
Arrive On Green 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.72 0.72 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3723 1401 1767 5567 1540 3428 2868 635 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1242 586 56 927 126 225 291 291
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1689 1580 1767 1856 1540 1714 1763 1740 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 7.4 3.3 7.6 21.5 21.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 7.4 3.3 7.6 21.5 21.8 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 2125 995 115 4030 1115 667 343 339 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.58 0.59 0.49 0.23 0.11 0.34 0.85 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 2125 995 209 4030 1115 927 477 470 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.9 6.2 5.6 46.9 52.5 52.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.6 1.3 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 7.6 8.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.2 0.3 1.9 2.7 1.0 3.3 10.2 10.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.6 1.3 62.1 6.2 5.7 47.0 60.1 61.0 LnGrp LOS AAAEAADEE
Approach Vol, veh/h 1828 1109 807
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.8 9.0 56.8
Approach LOS A A E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.8 90.5 31.8 103.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 67.5 36.5 87.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.1 2.0 23.8 9.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 35.4 2.3 13.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.3
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: Diamond Blvd & Burnett Ave Existing PM
Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 393 117 105 25 39 31 166 396 26 23 525 238 Future Volume (veh/h) 393 117 105 25 39 31 166 396 26 23 525 238 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 405 121 13 26 40 2 171 408 24 24 541 142 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 330 193 162 49 120 6 196 3470 202 47 2200 954 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.71 0.71 0.03 0.62 0.62 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 1856 1563 1767 3418 170 1767 4896 285 1767 3526 1528 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 405 121 13 26 20 22 171 280 152 24 541 142 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1714 1856 1563 1767 1763 1825 1767 1689 1804 1767 1763 1528 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.0 8.4 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.6 12.9 3.6 3.6 1.8 9.2 5.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.0 8.4 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.6 12.9 3.6 3.6 1.8 9.2 5.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 330 193 162 49 62 64 196 2394 1279 47 2200 954 V/C Ratio(X) 1.23 0.63 0.08 0.53 0.33 0.33 0.87 0.12 0.12 0.51 0.25 0.15 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 330 357 301 484 653 676 327 2394 1279 144 2200 954 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.75 0.75 0.75 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.0 58.0 54.7 64.8 63.6 63.6 59.1 6.2 6.3 64.9 11.3 10.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 125.9 1.3 0.1 3.3 1.1 1.1 6.7 0.1 0.2 2.4 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 11.4 4.0 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.7 6.1 1.2 1.4 0.8 3.6 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 186.9 59.2 54.7 68.1 64.7 64.7 65.7 6.3 6.4 67.3 11.5 10.8 LnGrp LOS F E D EEEEAAEBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 539 68 603 707
Approach Delay, s/veh 155.1 66.0 23.2 13.2
Approach LOS F E C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.6 100.7 17.0 9.8 19.0 89.3 7.7 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 43.0 13.0 50.0 25.0 29.0 37.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.8 5.6 15.0 3.6 14.9 11.2 4.0 10.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.1 0.2 5.2 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 58.1
HCM 6th LOS E
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Diamond Blvd & Galaxy Way Existing PM
Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 135 25 32 82 18 66 48 426 37 54 525 151 Future Volume (veh/h) 135 25 32 82 18 66 48 426 37 54 525 151 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 144 27 1 87 19 0 51 453 34 57 559 132 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 203 127 5 168 114 0 74 3246 241 77 2774 640
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.00 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.04 0.68 0.68 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 1777 66 3428 1856 0 1767 4811 357 1767 4101 946 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 144 0 28 87 19 0 51 317 170 57 458 233 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1714 0 1843 1714 1856 0 1767 1689 1791 1767 1689 1670 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.7 0.0 1.6 2.8 1.1 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 3.7 5.8 6.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.7 0.0 1.6 2.8 1.1 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 3.7 5.8 6.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.57
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 203 0 132 168 114 0 74 2279 1208 77 2285 1130 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.00 0.21 0.52 0.17 0.00 0.69 0.14 0.14 0.74 0.20 0.21 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 313 0 537 313 541 0 161 2279 1208 161 2285 1130 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.1 0.0 50.3 53.4 51.2 0.0 51.9 0.0 0.0 54.3 7.0 7.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.5 0.0 0.8 2.5 0.7 0.0 10.6 0.1 0.2 12.4 0.2 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 0.0 0.8 1.3 0.5 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.1 1.9 2.0 2.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.6 0.0 51.1 55.8 51.9 0.0 62.6 0.1 0.2 66.8 7.2 7.4 LnGrp LOS E A D E D AEAAEAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 172 106 538 748
Approach Delay, s/veh 56.6 55.1 6.1 11.8
Approach LOS EEAB
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.3 82.8 10.1 12.7 9.5 82.6 11.3 11.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.5 42.0 10.5 33.5 10.5 42.0 10.5 33.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 8.0 4.8 3.6 5.7 2.0 6.7 3.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 3.3 0.1 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.7
HCM 6th LOS B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
8: Diamond Blvd & The Veranda/Seafood City Dwy Existing PM Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 138 13 154 51 4 51 337 229 9 66 399 131 Future Volume (veh/h) 138 13 154 51 4 51 337 229 9 66 399 131 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 154 0 9 53 4 17 351 239 8 69 416 99 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 263 0 115 83 6 27 313 2252 75 88 2485 571
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.81 0.81 Sat Flow, veh/h 3534 0 1547 1228 93 394 3428 3480 116 1767 4103 943 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 154 0 9 74 0 0 351 121 126 69 340 175 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1547 1715 0 0 1714 1763 1834 1767 1689 1669 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.8 0.0 0.6 4.8 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 4.4 2.6 2.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.8 0.0 0.6 4.8 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 4.4 2.6 2.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.23 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.56
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 263 0 115 116 0 0 313 1141 1186 88 2046 1011 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.00 0.08 0.64 0.00 0.00 1.12 0.11 0.11 0.78 0.17 0.17 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 876 0 383 425 0 0 313 1141 1186 161 2046 1011 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.33 1.33 1.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 51.5 0.0 49.5 52.2 0.0 0.0 48.7 0.0 0.0 53.1 4.7 4.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 0.0 0.3 5.7 0.0 0.0 87.2 0.2 0.2 13.5 0.2 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 0.0 0.3 2.3 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.1 0.1 2.3 0.9 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 53.6 0.0 49.8 57.9 0.0 0.0 135.9 0.2 0.2 66.6 4.8 5.0 LnGrp LOS D A D E A A F AAEAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 163 74 598 584
Approach Delay, s/veh 53.4 57.9 79.9 12.2
Approach LOS D E E B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.2 79.4 13.1 15.0 74.7 12.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.5 29.0 28.5 10.5 29.0 28.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 2.0 6.8 12.5 4.7 6.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.3 0.5 0.0 3.3 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 47.8
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
9: Diamond Blvd & Willow Way Existing PM
Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 67 9 56 174 7 15 42 535 139 20 597 56 Future Volume (veh/h) 67 9 56 174 7 15 42 535 139 20 597 56 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 67 9 9 174 7 2 42 535 112 20 597 49 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 86 158 158 234 283 81 68 2359 483 44 2602 211 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.56 0.56 0.05 1.00 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 850 850 3428 1378 394 1767 4211 863 1767 4764 387 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 67 0 18 174 0 9 42 427 220 20 422 224 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1701 1714 0 1772 1767 1689 1697 1767 1689 1774 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.3 0.0 1.0 5.7 0.0 0.5 2.7 7.3 7.5 1.3 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.3 0.0 1.0 5.7 0.0 0.5 2.7 7.3 7.5 1.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.51 1.00 0.22
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 86 0 317 234 0 364 68 1892 951 44 1845 969 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.06 0.74 0.00 0.02 0.62 0.23 0.23 0.46 0.23 0.23 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 161 0 584 313 0 609 161 1892 951 161 1845 969 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.96 0.96 0.96 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.1 0.0 38.5 52.6 0.0 36.5 54.4 12.7 12.8 53.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.9 0.0 0.1 6.5 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.3 0.6 7.1 0.3 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 0.0 0.4 2.7 0.0 0.2 1.4 2.7 2.9 0.6 0.1 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 68.0 0.0 38.6 59.1 0.0 36.5 63.1 13.0 13.3 61.0 0.3 0.5 LnGrp LOS E A D E A D EBBEAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 85 183 689 666
Approach Delay, s/veh 61.8 57.9 16.2 2.2
Approach LOS EEBA
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.3 69.4 10.1 28.1 8.9 67.8 12.3 25.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.5 36.0 10.5 39.5 10.5 36.0 10.5 39.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 9.5 6.3 2.5 4.7 2.0 7.7 3.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.1 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.5
HCM 6th LOS B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
10: Diamond Blvd & Willows Hilton Dwy Existing PM
Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 10
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 60 0 50 7 1 4 249 635 10 1 788 69 Future Volume (veh/h) 60 0 50 7 1 4 249 635 10 1 788 69 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 62 0 4 7 1 0 257 655 9 1 812 65
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 246 0 187 189 195 0 348 3742 51 3 2993 238
Arrive On Green 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.73 0.00 0.63 0.63 Sat Flow, veh/h 1368 0 1538 899 1689 0 3428 5148 71 1767 4774 380 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 62 0 4 7 1 0 257 429 235 1 573 304 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1368 0 1538 899 1604 0 1714 1689 1842 1767 1689 1777 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 6.6 3.6 3.6 0.1 6.9 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 0.0 0.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 6.6 3.6 3.6 0.1 6.9 6.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.21
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 246 0 187 189 195 0 348 2455 1339 3 2118 1114 V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.74 0.17 0.18 0.34 0.27 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 606 0 589 549 615 0 686 2455 1339 216 2118 1114 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.4 0.0 34.8 38.3 34.7 0.0 39.3 3.8 3.8 44.9 7.5 7.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.1 0.3 57.0 0.3 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.8 1.0 1.1 0.1 2.2 2.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 36.9 0.0 34.9 38.4 34.8 0.0 42.0 4.0 4.1 101.8 7.8 8.1 LnGrp LOS D A C D C A D A A F A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 66 8 921 878
Approach Delay, s/veh 36.8 38.0 14.6 8.1
Approach LOS D D B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.1 70.4 15.4 13.1 61.4 15.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 5.0 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 31.0 34.5 18.0 24.0 34.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 5.6 6.2 8.6 8.9 5.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.6 5.0 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.4
HCM 6th LOS B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
11: I-680 NB Off-Ramp/I-680 NB On-Ramp & Willow Pass Rd Existing PM Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 11
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 508 1673 0 0 1038 420 290 2 240 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 508 1673 0 0 1038 420 290 2 240 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 0 0 1148 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 529 1743 0 0 1081 0 303 0 250
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 330033333
Cap, veh/h 1265 2808 0 0 1213 402 0 357
Arrive On Green 0.37 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 3618 0 0 3236 1572 3534 0 3145
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 529 1743 0 0 1081 0 303 0 250
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1714 1763 0 0 1044 1572 1767 0 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.5 19.9 0.0 0.0 32.3 0.0 8.3 0.0 7.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.5 19.9 0.0 0.0 32.3 0.0 8.3 0.0 7.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1265 2808 0 0 1213 402 0 357
V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.75 0.00 0.70
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1265 2808 0 0 1284 954 0 849
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.5 4.1 0.0 0.0 28.7 0.0 43.0 0.0 42.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.5 4.8 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 3.6 0.0 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.6 5.1 0.0 0.0 35.5 0.0 44.1 0.0 43.6 LnGrp LOS C A A A D D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2272 1081 A 553
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.4 35.5 43.9
Approach LOS A D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 84.6 41.9 42.7 15.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 * 4 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 64.0 21.0 * 41 27.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.9 13.5 34.3 10.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 33.1 0.7 4.5 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.5
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
12: Diamond Blvd & Willow Pass Rd Existing PM
Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 12
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 442 1309 69 73 838 371 179 50 87 403 41 479 Future Volume (veh/h) 442 1309 69 73 838 371 179 50 87 403 41 479 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 451 1336 0 74 855 0 183 51 0 411 42 74 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 1480 2925 231 1025 233 236 486 281 420
Arrive On Green 0.43 0.58 0.00 0.07 0.20 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.14 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 5066 1572 3428 5066 1572 3428 3526 1572 3428 1856 2768 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 451 1336 0 74 855 0 183 51 0 411 42 74 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1714 1689 1572 1714 1689 1572 1714 1763 1572 1714 1856 1384 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.1 21.2 0.0 2.9 22.7 0.0 7.4 1.9 0.0 16.4 2.8 1.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.1 21.2 0.0 2.9 22.7 0.0 7.4 1.9 0.0 16.4 2.8 1.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1480 2925 231 1025 233 236 486 281 420 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.46 0.32 0.83 0.79 0.22 0.85 0.15 0.18 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1480 2925 269 1284 367 768 661 364 544 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.87 0.87 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.0 17.0 0.0 62.2 53.6 0.0 64.3 61.8 0.0 58.6 51.6 8.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.3 2.8 0.0 2.2 0.2 0.0 8.4 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.9 8.2 0.0 1.3 9.8 0.0 3.3 0.9 0.0 7.6 1.3 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.1 17.3 0.0 62.5 56.4 0.0 66.5 62.0 0.0 67.0 51.6 8.3 LnGrp LOS C B E E E E E D A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1787 A 929 A 234 A 527
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.5 56.9 65.5 57.5
Approach LOS BEEE
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.4 86.3 13.5 26.7 65.9 33.8 25.3 14.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 5.5 * 5.5 5.5 * 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 52.5 15.0 27.5 28.0 * 36 27.0 * 31 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 23.2 9.4 4.8 14.1 24.7 18.4 3.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.5 0.2 0.2 0.8 3.1 1.5 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.4
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
13: Franquette Ave/Waterworld Pkwy & Willow Pass Rd Existing PM Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 13
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 53 1702 18 50 1077 19 85 4 116 99 2 114 Future Volume (veh/h) 53 1702 18 50 1077 19 85 4 116 99 2 114 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1465 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 1792 12 53 1134 19 89 4 3 104 2 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 1584 3809 1149 68 1330 22 142 26 22 180 47 38 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.04 0.33 0.33 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.03 0.03 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 5066 1528 1767 4049 68 3428 1856 1535 3428 1856 1517 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 1792 12 53 747 406 89 4 3 104 2 3 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1714 1689 1528 1767 1333 1450 1714 1856 1535 1714 1856 1517 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 42.2 0.8 4.2 36.6 36.6 3.6 0.3 0.2 4.1 0.1 0.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 42.2 0.8 4.2 36.6 36.6 3.6 0.3 0.2 4.1 0.1 0.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1584 3809 1149 68 876 476 142 26 22 180 47 38 V/C Ratio(X) 0.04 0.47 0.01 0.78 0.85 0.85 0.63 0.15 0.14 0.58 0.04 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1584 3809 1149 139 971 528 514 490 406 514 490 401 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.7 28.9 13.4 66.7 43.8 43.8 66.0 68.2 53.8 64.8 66.6 13.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.3 0.0 15.8 6.7 11.7 6.3 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.1 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 19.2 0.3 2.2 12.8 14.5 1.7 0.2 0.1 1.9 0.1 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.7 29.2 13.4 82.5 50.6 55.5 72.3 69.2 54.9 65.9 66.7 14.0 LnGrp LOS C C B F D E E E D E E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 1860 1206 96 109
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.3 53.6 71.6 64.5
Approach LOS C D E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.4 110.3 10.8 8.5 69.7 51.0 12.3 7.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 51.0 21.0 37.0 11.0 51.0 21.0 37.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 44.2 5.6 2.1 3.9 38.6 6.1 2.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.7 0.3 0.0 0.1 7.4 0.1 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 40.7
HCM 6th LOS D
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
14: Market St & Pine Street & Willow Pass Rd Existing PM Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR EBR2 WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR NBR2 SBL2 SBL Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 169 1293 171 327 478 29 378 465 171 4 91 61 Future Volume (vph) 169 1293 171 327 478 29 378 465 171 4 91 61 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1500 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.98 0.85 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95
Satd. Flow (prot) 3400 3894 1568 4985 3400 3361 1752
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95
Satd. Flow (perm) 3400 3894 1568 4985 3400 3361 1752
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 172 1319 174 334 488 30 386 474 174 4 93 62 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 130 50000000
Lane Group Flow (vph) 172 1493 0 204 513 0 386 652 0 0 0 155 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 10 9
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 2
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot Prot
Protected Phases 1 6 2 3 8 7 7
Permitted Phases 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 11.4 60.7 60.7 44.8 24.1 31.8 13.0 Effective Green, g (s) 11.4 60.7 60.7 44.8 24.1 31.8 13.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.51 0.51 0.37 0.20 0.27 0.11
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 323 1969 793 1861 682 890 189
v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.38 0.10 0.11 c0.19 c0.09
v/s Ratio Perm 0.13
v/c Ratio 0.53 0.76 0.26 0.28 0.57 0.73 0.82
Uniform Delay, d1 51.8 23.8 16.8 26.3 43.2 40.2 52.4
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 1.8 0.2 0.4 1.1 3.4 23.9
Delay (s) 53.4 25.6 17.1 26.6 44.3 43.6 76.2
Level of Service D C B C D D E
Approach Delay (s) 26.6 26.6 43.9
Approach LOS C C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 35.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave Existing Sat
Authentic Synchro 11 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 911 809 222 1252 774 273
Future Volume (veh/h) 911 809 222 1252 774 273
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 959 0 234 1318 815 79
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333
Cap, veh/h 2312 261 3228 958 439
Arrive On Green 0.46 0.00 0.15 0.64 0.28 0.28
Sat Flow, veh/h 5233 1572 1767 5233 3428 1572
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 959 0 234 1318 815 79
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1689 1572 1767 1689 1714 1572
Q Serve(g_s), s 15.2 0.0 15.6 15.3 27.0 4.6
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.2 0.0 15.6 15.3 27.0 4.6
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 2312 261 3228 958 439
V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.90 0.41 0.85 0.18
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2312 295 3228 1228 563
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.9 0.0 50.3 10.7 40.9 32.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 22.8 0.1 4.8 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.0 0.0 8.4 5.2 11.8 1.8
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.4 0.0 73.0 10.8 45.6 33.0
LnGrp LOS C E B D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 959 A 1552 894
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.4 20.2 44.5
Approach LOS C C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.7 59.8 38.5 81.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 43.0 43.0 67.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.6 17.2 29.0 17.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 9.6 4.6 18.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.2
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.