1 COUNCILMEMBERS
Laura M. Nakamura, Mayor
Dominic D. Aliano, Vice Mayor
Pablo Benavente
Laura M. Hoffmeister
Carlyn S. Obringer
Civic Center
1950 Parkside Drive
Concord, CA 94519
www.cityofconcord.org
Regular Meeting of the
Concord City Council
Tuesday
January 13, 2026
6:30 p.m. - Open Session Council Chamber
1950 Parkside Drive
and/or various
telephonic/electronic
locations
*IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT PUBLIC COMMENTS AND MEETING PARTICIPATION* Members of the public are invited to attend and participate at: Council Chamber, 1950 Parkside Drive, Concord, CA.
Please note the following change to the City’s public comment procedures: Unless a Councilmember is participating in the meeting remotely, remote public comment will not be accepted. Public comment may be provided in-person or via email, as set forth below. Members of the public desiring to provide comments as a part of the meeting are encouraged to either submit written comments by 3:00 p.m. prior to the meeting or to attend the meeting in person.
HOW TO PARTICIPATE
The public is invited to participate in the City Council meeting using any of the following methods:
1. IN PERSON:
a.Members of the public can provide in-person comments in the Council Chamber.
Members of the public are encouraged, but not required, to fill out a speaker card. The Council Chamber will have seating available for members of the public to attend in person up to full seating capacity.
2 2. REMOTE: Remote public comment will not be accepted, except when a Councilmember participates remotely. At the time of the posting of this agenda, none of the Councilmembers have notified the City Clerk’s Office that they intend to participate remotely, and therefore no remote public comment will be accepted at the meeting. If, after publication of this agenda and before the meeting begins, any councilmember determines that they will need to participate remotely, their remote participation will be announced at the outset of the meeting in connection with the Roll Call item. If a Councilmember participates in the meeting remotely, the public may participate and provide public comment remotely, as follows:
a. Zoom: https://cityofconcord.zoom.us/s/83142542975 or Zoom Webinar ID: 831 4254 2975 and Passcode: 336546
b.Zoom Phone Numbers. Dial Toll Free: (669) 900-6833 or (346) 348-7799 or (253) 215- 8782.
c.During the meeting, each period for public comment will be announced, and participants may use the “Raise Hand” feature on Zoom to request to speak. If calling in via Zoom use *9 to raise and lower your hand. The meeting host will call on you, by name, and promote you to panelist in the webinar so you can be seen via your camera. Please enable your microphone when it is your turn to speak. In order to ensure the orderly administration of the meeting using this method, providing your name is encouraged, but is not required. (If you need instructions on how to use this feature, please contact the City Clerk by 3:00 p.m. of the meeting date at [email protected]).
3. EMAIL:
a.Public comments can also be submitted via email to [email protected]. Please note that emailed comments will not be read aloud by staff. Any public comments received up until 3:00 p.m. of the meeting date will be:
1. distributed to the Council before the meeting,
2. posted online for public inspection at
https://stream.ci.concord.ca.us/OnBaseAgendaOnline/Meetings/Search, and
3. inserted into the meeting record.
b.As emails containing public meeting comments are part of the official record, note that personal contact information may be published if it is included with your email.
4. TO WATCH OR LISTEN ONLY:
a.Watch on TV on Comcast Channel 28, Astound/Wave Channels 29 and 1026, and AT&T U-verse Channel 99
b.Watch the TV broadcast through the City’s website by following THIS LINK c.Watch Live Streaming of the meeting by following THIS LINK d.Join the Zoom webinar by following THIS LINK
3 5. INTERPRETATION OR WRITTEN TRANSLATION:
OPEN SESSION
1. OPENING
Roll Call – Councilmember Announcements of “Just Cause” Remote Participation
Pledge of Allegiance – Councilmember Hoffmeister
2. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
This is a 15-minute Public Comment Period for items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction that are not on this agenda. Each speaker will be limited to approximately three minutes.
State law prohibits the City Council from acting at this meeting on any matter raised during the Public Comment Period. Please see “How to Submit Public Comments” above
3. PRESENTATION
a. Presentation – honoring January 19, 2026, as "Martin Luther King Day" in the City of Concord. Presentation by Mayor Nakamura.
4. CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR
The public is entitled to address the City Council on items appearing on the Consent Calendar before or during the City Council’s consideration of the Consent Calendar. Adoption of the Consent Calendar may be made by one motion of the City Council, provided that any Councilmember, individual or organization may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration.
If a request for removal of an item from the Consent Calendar has been received, the Mayor may defer action on the particular item and place the same on the regular agenda for consideration in any order s/he deems appropriate. Please see “How to Submit Public Comments” above.
1. To access interpretation or written translation during the meeting, please scan the QR Code or click this link:
Para accesar a la traducción durante la reunion, por favor escanee el Código QR o haga clic en el enlace:
https://attend.wordly.ai/join/SYMQ-8840
2. Choose Language and Click Attend
Seleccione su lenguaje y haga clic en asistir
3. Use a headset on your phone for audio or read the transcript on your device.
Use sus auriculares para escuchar el audio o leer la transcipción en el dispositivo.
4 a. Considering – approval of minutes of the December 2 and 9, 2025, Regular Meetings and December 9 and 16, 2025, Special Meetings. Recommended by the City Clerk.
b. Considering – adoption of Ordinance No. 25-8, entitled "An Ordinance Amending Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations) to Include the 2025 California Building Standards Code and the 2024 Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code and Ratifying Amendments to the 2025 California Fire Code and 2025 California Wildland- Urban Interface Code Contained in the Conra Costa County Ordinances No. 2025-14 and No. 2025-15. Ordinance No. 25-8 was introduced on November 4, 2025, by reading of the title only and waiving further reading.
Recommended by the City Clerk.
CEQA: Not a project/exempt under and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065, CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2), 15061(b)(3), and/or 15378. c. Considering – the following actions for the Rocketship/ Glenbrook Sidewalk Gap Closure Project:
1. Adoption of a Resolution approving a request to Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for an allocation of $208,000 of Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Project Funding for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 to support the Rocketship/Glenbrook Sidewalk Gap Closure, located on Olivera Road between Hillsborough Drive and Thunderbird Drive; and
2. Authorizing the City Manager to accept and appropriate grant funding from MTC up to $208,000 and execute all necessary documents in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Recommended by the Director of Community Development.
CEQA: Not a project/exempt per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061 (b)(2), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15282(j), 15378, 15301, 15302, 15303, 15304, Public Resources Code Section 21065, and/or 21080.19. d. Considering – the recommendation of the Council Committee on Housing and Economic Development to defer the implementation of Objective 4.7 of the 2023-2031 Housing Element to facilitate affordable housing development on property owned by public educational agencies. Recommended by the Director of Community Development.
CEQA: Exempt/not a project pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2), 15061(b)(3), and/or 15378.
5 e. Considering – authorizing the Mayor to sign and submit a Letter of Support to Congressman DeSaulnier designating the United States Postal Service office building located at 2121 Meridian Park Boulevard in Concord, California, as the "Carl Jefferson Post Office Building" (H.R. 6849).
Recommended by the Community Relations Manager.
f. Considering – authorizing an increase to the contingency from 15% to 21% (an increase of $453,780) on the existing construction contract with Bay Cities Paving & Grading Inc. for the Residential Pavement Maintenance Phase E Project located on Port Chicago Highway and the St. Francis Park and Holbrook Heights neighborhoods (City Project Nos. 2613 & 2621) to cover additional paving and fiber optic work. (Funded by Measure V, Fund 407) Recommended by the Director of Community Development.
CEQA: Previously determined not to be a project/exempt per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(2), 15061(b)(3), 15378, 15301, 15302, 15303, 15304 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065. g. Considering – the following actions for the Citywide Accessibility Improvements No. 12 (Project No. 2728), which will upgrade curb ramps at five locations throughout the City:
1. Award of a Construction Contract in the amount of $400,988 to Rosas Brothers Construction and authorizing staff to utilize the available project contingency for contract change orders up to 10% of the contract amount; authorizing the Mayor to execute the contract in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; and making the NEPA and CEQA determination as provided in this staff report (Funded by Community Development Block Grant Funds and Measure J Local Funds);
2. Approving related budget transfers in the total amount of $210,000 from Street Maintenance Project No. 1 (Project No. 2736); and
3. Authorizing the City Engineer to accept the improvements upon completion of Project No. 2728 and directing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
Recommended by the Director of Community Development.
NEPA: Categorical exclusion per Section 24 CFR 58.25 (a)(2). CEQA: Not a project/exempt per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060 (c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15302, 15304, and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065. h. Considering – a recommendation by the City Council Committee on Housing and Economic Development to defer the implementation of Housing Element Objective 16.1 facilitating tiny homes and cottage developments on religious institution sites. Recommended by the Director of Community Development. 6 CEQA: Exempt/not a project pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2), 15061(b)(3), and/or 15378.
i. Considering – adoption of a Resolution accepting the Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and making findings in compliance with AB 1600. (Government Code Section 66000 et. seq) Recommended by the Director of Community Development.
CEQA: Not a project/exempt pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065, CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2), 15061(b)(3), 15262, 15273, and/or 15378.
j. Considering – adoption of a Resolution accepting and appropriating a $300,000 grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to enhance the City’s Collision Dashboard and approval for use for the development of the Enhanced Collision Dashboard for Concord (Project TRA-26-001); approval of a task order with TJKM Transportation Consultants under the existing Master Services Agreement (MSA), Agreement No. CCA-6083, in an amount not to exceed $300,000 to develop and configure OTS grant-funded dashboard features; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the task order in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Recommended by the Director of Public Works.
CEQA: Not a project/exempt per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15306, 15378, and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.
k. Considering – approval of Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates in a not-to-exceed amount of $250,750 for project design and related services for the lower Mount Diablo Creek Restoration Study Project (Project No. 2805, FAIN No. HQ00052510032), and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. (Storm Water Management Fund, Federal Grant) Recommended by the Director of Community Development.
CEQA: Not a project/exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15262, 15273, 15378, and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.
l. Considering – approval of Task Order #3 with Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. in the amount of $100,700 for a new total not-to-exceed amount of $291,356 to provide design engineering and related services for the Storm Drain Master Plan Project (Project No. 2732) and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Task Order in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. (Measure V Projects 7 Funds, Storm Water Management Fund) Recommended by the Director of Community Development.
CEQA: Not a project/exempt per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15262, 15273, 15306, 15378, and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.
5. CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM
The public is entitled to address the City Council on items appearing on the agenda before or during the City Council’s consideration of that item. Each speaker will be limited to approximately three minutes. Please see “How to Submit Public Comments” above. a. Considering – approval of the City Manager candidate profile. Report by Sara Castro, Senior Human Resources Analyst.
CEQA: Not a project/exempt pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065, California Code of Regulations Title 14 Sections 15061(b), 15273 and/or 15378.
6. CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
Persons who wish to speak on Public Hearings listed on the agenda will be heard when the public hearing is opened, except on public hearing items previously heard and closed to public comment.
After the public has commented, the item is closed to further public comment and brought to the Council level for discussion and action. Further comment from the audience will not be received unless requested by the Council. No public hearing shall commence after 10 p.m. unless approved by majority vote of the City Council. Please see “How to Submit Public Comments” above. a. Considering – introduction of an Ordinance amending Concord Municipal Code Title 18 (Development Code), Chapters 18.30 (Residential Districts) and 18.40 (Office and Commercial Districts) to increase maximum residential and mixed-use building heights in the Community Office (CO), Commercial Mixed Use (CMX), and Residential High Density (RH) zoning districts to implement state law and Objective 2.6 of the 2023-2031 Housing Element by reading of the title only and waiving further reading. (PL25200 – MC) Report by Benjamin Ulrey, Associate Planner.
CEQA: Statutorily exempt pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21080.085, enacted by Senate Bill 131 (2025); and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) or 15378.
7. CORRESPONDENCE
Correspondence received at the City Council meeting will be listed here on the Annotated Agenda. a. Letter of Support for Mt. Diablo USD's CEC GFO-25-301 (EPIC) DRIVES Grant Application, including School Bus Charging Infrstructrure Storage +Solar Microgrid Integration - 11/10/2025
8 b. Letter to Chabad of Concord - 12/17/2025
8. REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Closed Session Announcements
City Manager or Staff Reports
Council Reports
a Considering – appointing Councilmembers to represent the City Council on Council committees and regional bodies and boards of various external organizations of which the City is a member. Report by Mayor Nakamura.
9. ADJOURNMENT
Next Meeting: Regular Meeting
Date: 1/27/2026 6:30 PM
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
There is a 90-day limit for the filing of a challenge in the Superior Court to certain City administrative decisions and orders which require a hearing by law, the receipt of evidence, and the exercise of discretion. The 90-day limit begins on the date the decision is final (Code of Civil Procedure §1094.6). Further, if you challenge an action taken by the City Council in court, you may be limited by California law to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in the hearing or in a written correspondence delivered to the City Council prior to or at the hearing.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and California Law, it is the policy of the City of Concord to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including those with disabilities. If you are disabled and require a copy of a public hearing notice, or an agenda and/or agenda packet in an appropriate alternative format; or if you require other accommodation, please contact the ADA Coordinator Tianjun Cao at (925) 671-3243 or [email protected], at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CONCORD CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
1950 PARKSIDE DRIVE
CONCORD, CALIFORNIA AND VARIOUS
TELEPHONIC/ELECTRONIC LOCATIONS
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2025
The Concord City Council met in a regular meeting in the Council Chamber, located at 1950 Parkside Drive and via various telephonic/electronic locations at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, December 2, 2025, with Mayor Obringer presiding. The pledge of allegiance was led by Councilmember Benavente.
Minutes follow in abbreviated form per Resolution 3361 and Council Minutes of September 26, 1966.
ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Dominic Aliano, Pablo Benavente, Laura Hoffmeister (arrived at 6:37 p.m.), Laura Nakamura, Carlyn Obringer CITY TREASURER PRESENT: Patti Barsotti
STAFF PRESENT: Susanne Brown, City Attorney; Justin Ezell, Assistant City Manager; Joelle Fockler, City Clerk; Monique Robinson, Deputy City Clerk; Greg Taylor, Director of Information Technology; Margaret O’Brien, Director of Finance; Guy Bjerke, Director of Economic Development and Base Reuse; Steve Voorhies,
Director of Recreation Services; Mindy Gentry, Director of Community Development; James Nakayama, Police Captain;
Carlton Thompson, City Engineer; Abhishek Parikh, Deputy Director of Public Works-Transportation; Colleen Awad,
Community Relations Manager; Marie Suvansin, Economic
Development Manager; Jeff Rayos, Administrative Services Manager; Bruce Davis, Senior Civil Engineer; Himmat Bains, Senior Financial Analyst; Deyuanne Lei, Associate Civil Engineer; Aldrich Bautista, Associate Civil Engineer; William Wahbeh, Associate Civil Engineer; Melissa Rea, Economic Development Specialist
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
WHO ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL: Dick Offerman, Pleasant Hill; John Tague; Kevin Cabral, President/CEO, Greater Concord Chamber of Commerce;
Janette Green, Concord
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
Dick Offerman, Pleasant Hill, spoke on the use of leaded aviation fuel at Buchanan Field.
The City Council Consent Calendar was considered out of agenda order prior to Presentations.
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR
No public comment was received.
4.a4.a4.a4.a
City Council Minutes December 2, 2025
2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES – November 4, 2025, Special and Regular Meetings, and November 4, 2025, Special Concord/Pleasant Hill Health Care District Board of Directors Meeting A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Nakamura to approve the minutes of the November 4, 2025, Special and Regular Meetings, and the November 4, 2025, Special Concord/Pleasant Hill Health Care District Board of Directors Meeting. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
RECEIVE TREASURER’S REPORT – July 1 – September 30, 2025 A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Nakamura to receive the Treasurer’s Report for the period July 1 – September 30, 2025. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 25-8 – Amending Concord Municipal Code, Title 15 (Building and Building Regulations)
The City Attorney announced a clerical correction to Ordinance No. 25-8, Section 15.67.030, due to change of date of adoption of Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 25-15. The text removed was “adopted on November 4, 2025.”
A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Nakamura to adopt Ordinance No. 25-8 entitled, “An Ordinance Amending the Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Building and Building Regulations) to Include the 2025 California Building Standards Code and the 2024 Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code, and Ratifying Amendments to the 2025 California Fire Code and 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code Contained in the Contra Costa County Ordinances No. 2025-14 and No. 2025-15." Ordinance No. 25-8 was introduced on November 4, 2025, by reading of the title only and waiving further reading. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
REJECT ALL BIDS - Transportation Offices at the Corporation Yard, Project No. 2648 A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Nakamura to reject all bids submitted for the Transportation Offices at the Corporation Yard (Project No. 2648) and direct staff to re-advertise the project for bids. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 25-46 – Accepting and Appropriating Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program (EECBG)
A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Nakamura to adopt Resolution No. 25-46 entitled, “A Resolution Accepting and Appropriating Grant Funding from the California Office of State and Community Energy Programs (SCEP) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in the Amount of $170,110 for Appropriation of Funds and Approval for Use for the City’s Citywide LED Traffic Signal Indication Upgrade (Project TRA-26-001).” The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, APPROVE BUDGET TRANSFER, AND ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS – Golf Course Maintenance Building Fire Repair Project (Project No. 2551) A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Nakamura to;
1. Award a construction contract in the amount of $255,360 to PIK Construction Inc. for the repair of fire damage to the City’s golf course’s maintenance building at the Diablo Creek Golf Course, authorize staff to utilize the available project contingency for contract change orders up to 20% of the contract amount, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; and
2. Approve a budget transfer from the Diablo Creek Golf Course Bridges (Project No. 2532) in the amount of $380,000 to the Golf Course Maintenance Building Fire Repair Project (Project No. 2551) and associated appropriation of such funds; and
City Council Minutes December 2, 2025
3 3. Authorize the City Engineer to accept the improvements upon completion of Project No. 2551 and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, APPROVE BUDGET TRANSFER, AND ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS – Residential Pavement Maintenance No. 1 Project (Project No. 2741) This item was pulled from consideration on the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Benavente.
Public comment provided by John Tague.
A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Nakamura to;
1. Award a construction contract in the not-to-exceed amount of $740,618.90 to McKim Corporation, authorize staff to utilize the available project contingency for contract change orders up to 20% of the contract amount, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; and
2. Approve a budget transfer in the amount of $330,700 from the Citywide Arterial & Collector Maintenance Project #2 (Project No. 2527) to Project No. 2741 and appropriation of such funds; and
3. Authorize the City Engineer to accept the improvements upon completion of Project No. 2741 and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
APPROVE PURCHASE OF AGING EQUIPMENT – Tesco Controls
A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Nakamura to approve the purchase of 60 batteries and 50 inverters from Tesco Controls to replace aging equipment at citywide traffic signal locations in an amount not to exceed $221,859.63, authorize the City Manager to execute the associated documents in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, and make the CEQA determinations as set forth in the staff report. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
APPROVE FIVE-YEAR GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT – East Bay Golf Course Maintenance, LLC
A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Nakamura to approve a five-year golf course maintenance services agreement, with an additional 3.25-year option to extend through March 30, 2034, with East Bay Golf Course Maintenance, LLC. for Diablo Creek Golf Course in an amount not to exceed $1,308,540 annually during the first two calendar years and including annual adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the remaining years including any extension, with the ability of the Director of Recreation to approve additional work up to $95,000 per calendar year, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement together with any optional extension in a form approved by the City Attorney. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
PRESENTATIONS
The presentation of certificates to Mayor’s Art Competition winners was presented out of agenda order.
MAYOR’S ART COMPETITION WINNERS
No public comment was received.
City Council Minutes December 2, 2025
4 PROCLAMATION – 2025 Beacon Spotlight Award to the City of Concord No public comment was received.
PROCLAMATION – National Alzheimer’s Disease Awareness and National Family Caregivers Month – November 2025
Public comment provided by John Tague.
COMMENDATION CERTIFICATE – Laasya Munjeti, Harmonizing Minds No public comment was received.
BUSINESS RECOGNITION AWARDS – Airgas, Luna Restaurant, Pet Food Express, and Rockin’ Robbies
Public comment provided by John Tague.
CONTRA COSTA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT QUARTERLY UPDATE
Public comment provided by John Tague.
ANNOUCEMENTS
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT AUTHORITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECRUITMENT City Clerk Joelle Fockler announced a recruitment for the City of Concord’s representative on the Central Contra Costa Transit Authority Advisory Committee (County Connection) for a three-year term ending June 30, 2028, and setting a deadline of Friday, January 9, 2026, at 5 p.m. as the deadline for receipt of applications by the City Clerk.
No public comment was received.
CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS
ADOPT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
Marie Suvansin, Economic Development Manager, introduced the item then turned the presentation over to Derek Braun, Principal, Strategic Economics, and David Greensfelder, Managing Principal, Greensfelder Commercial Real Estate LLC.
Public comment provided by:
Kevin Cabral, President/CEO, Greater Concord Chamber of Commerce Janette Green, Concord
A motion was made by Hoffmeister and seconded by Benavente to adopt the Economic Development Strategic Plan. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
Mayor Obringer recessed the meeting at 10:36 p.m. The meeting resumed at 10:45 p.m.
City Council Minutes December 2, 2025
5 ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 25-47 – Amending Policy and Procedure No. 2 and Establishing the Day of the Week and the Number of Meetings per Month that Council Meetings will Convene Joelle Fockler, City Clerk, presented the staff report.
No public comment was received.
A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Nakamura to adopt Resolution No. 25-47 entitled, “A Resolution Amending Policy and Procedure No. 2 and Establishing the Day of the Week and the Number of Meetings per Month that Council Meetings will Convene as Set Forth in the Attached 2026 City Council Meeting Calendar.” The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
Because it was after 11 p.m., a motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Aliano to consider the remaining items on the agenda. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
CORRESPONDENCE
a. Agenda Item No. 3.f – Contra Costa County Fire Protection District – PowerPoint Presentation b. Agenda Item No. 5.b – Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) Policy – PowerPoint Presentation c. Agenda Item No. 5.d – Benched Correspondence
d. Agenda Item No. 6.a – Concord Economic Development Strategic Plan – PowerPoint Presentation
COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Aliano, as a member of the City Manager Recruitment Process Ad Hoc Committee, provided an update on the City Manager Recruitment Process.
Councilmembers shared information on events and activities in which they had participated since the last meeting and commented on items of interest.
ADJOURNMENT
By order of the Mayor, the meeting was adjourned on December 2, 2025, at 11:07 p.m.
CARLYN S. OBRINGER
MAYOR
JOELLE FOCKLER, MMC
CITY CLERK
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
CONCORD CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM
1950 PARKSIDE DRIVE, WING A
CONCORD, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2025
The Concord City Council met in a special meeting in the City Council Conference Room, located at 1950 Parkside Drive, Wing A, Concord, California at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, December 9, 2025, with Mayor Obringer presiding and all Councilmembers present. (Councilmember Hoffmeister arrived at 5:35 p.m.) Minutes follow in abbreviated form per Resolution 3361 and Council Minutes of September 26, 1966.
No public comment was received.
The meeting was recessed and immediately reconvened in a closed session on CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 2 Agency designated representatives: Valerie Barone, City Manager; Jasmin Loi, Director of Human Resources; Lisa Charbonneau, Esq., Liebert Cassidy Whitmore; Employee organizations: Peace Officer Representation Unit of Concord Police Officers Association; and Police Managerial Representation Unit of Police Managers’ Association and CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: Valerie Barone, City Manager; Jasmin Loi, Director of Human Resources; Lisa Charbonneau, Esq., Liebert Cassidy Whitmore; Employee organizations: Administrative, Technical & Clerical Representation Unit and Field & Operations Representation Unit of International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 856, and Professional Representation Unit of OPEIU Local 29.
ADJOURNMENT
By order of the Mayor, the meeting was adjourned on December 9, 2025, at 6:20 p.m.
CARLYN S. OBRINGER
MAYOR
MONIQUE ROBINSON
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CONCORD CITY COUNCIL/CITY COUNCIL
SITTING AS THE LOCAL REUSE AUTHORITY
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
1950 PARKSIDE DRIVE
CONCORD, CALIFORNIA AND VARIOUS
TELEPHONIC/ELECTRONIC LOCATIONS
TUESDAY, DECECMBER 9, 2025
The Concord City Council met in a regular meeting in the Council Chamber, located at 1950 Parkside Drive and via various telephonic/electronic locations at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, December 9, 2025, with Mayor Obringer presiding. The pledge of allegiance was led by St. Bonaventure Catholic Church’s Club Scout Pack 444. Minutes follow in abbreviated form per Resolution 3361 and Council Minutes of September 26, 1966.
ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Dominic Aliano, Pablo Benavente, Laura Hoffmeister, Laura Nakamura, Carlyn Obringer
CITY TREASURER PRESENT: Patti Barsotti
STAFF PRESENT: Valerie Barone, City Manager; Susanne Brown, City Attorney; Justin Ezell, Assistant City Manager; Monique Robinson, Deputy City Clerk; Mark Bustillos, Chief of Police; Greg Taylor, Director of Information Technology; Guy Bjerke, Director of Economic Development and Base Reuse; Mindy Gentry, Director of
Community Development; Will Tarbox, Director of Public Works; Steve Voorhies, Director of Recreation Services; James
Nakayama, Police Captain; Kit Jory, Parks Manager; Colleen Awad, Community Relations Manager; Carlson Thompson, City Engineer; Tianjun Cao, Associate Civil Engineer
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
WHO ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL: Judy Barrientos, ATU Local 160 Transit; Wess; Aaron Hawkins, Live Nation; Kay Saeyang; Ken Carlson, Contra Costa County District IV Supervisor; Marisol Fuentes, Rising Juntos
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
Judy Barrientos, ATU Local 160 Transit, expressed concerns regarding road changes, lane narrowing, and how bus routes are affected.
Wess shared information on the book 500 Hats of Bartholomew Cubbins.
Aaron Hawkins, Live Nation, presented the City with a commemorative poster celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Concord Pavilion.
PRESENTATIONS
MAYOR’S COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD – Walter Eichinger
No public comment was received.
City Council Minutes December 9, 2025
2 CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR
Public comment was provided by Kay Saeyang.
APPROVE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT – PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc. dba GameTime This item was pulled from consideration on the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Benavente.
A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Hoffmeister to approve a Construction Contract in the not-to-exceed amount of $190,637.08, $173,306.08 base amount and an additional 10% of $17,331 as project contingency for contract change orders to PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc. dba GameTime, to replace playground at Concord Community Park and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
AWARD ON-CALL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT – On-Call Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Phase 4 (Project No. 2341)
A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Hoffmeister to award an on-call construction contract for On-Call Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Phase 4 (Project No. 2341) to Frontline General Engineering Construction Inc. for one year (with two one-year extensions possible) in the amount not to exceed $500,000 annually and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
APPROVE PURCHASE – Police Mobile Data Computers (MDC’s) A motion was made by Benavente and seconded by Hoffmeister to approve the purchase of 68 police Mobile Data Computers (MDC’s) and installation services from CDCE Inc. in an amount not-to- exceed $566,905, including a 5% contingency, in accordance with the City’s technology replacement schedule; and authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION PROCEEDINGS
COMMENTS BY OUTGOING MAYOR – Carlyn S. Obringer
Public comment provided by Contra Costa County District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson.
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 25-48 – Confirming and Designating the Mayor Public comment provided by Marisol Fuentes, Rising Juntos.
A motion was made by Obringer and seconded by Aliano to nominate Vice Mayor Laura M.
Nakamura as Mayor of the City of Concord and adopt Resolution No. 25-48 entitled, “A Resolution Designating Laura M. Nakamura as Mayor of the City of Concord.” The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 25-49 – Confirming and Designating the Vice Mayor A motion was made by Nakamura and seconded by Obringer to nominate Councilmember Dominic Aliano as Vice Mayor of the City of Concord and adopt Resolution No. 25-49 entitled, “A Resolution Designating Dominic Aliano as Vice Mayor of the City of Concord.” The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
City Council Minutes December 9, 2025
3 LOCAL REUSE AUTHORITY REORGANIZATION CONFIRMATION
No public comment was received.
A motion was made by Obringer and seconded by Hoffmeister confirming the designation of Mayor Nakamura and Vice Mayor Aliano to serve as the Chair and Vice Chair of the Local Reuse Authority for the Concord Naval Weapons Station Reuse Plan respectively, as authorized by Resolution No. 06-01, adopted January 10, 2006. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council.
CORRESPONDENCE
a. Agenda Item No. 7.a - Winter Food Drive Flyer
ADJOURNMENT
By order of the Mayor, the meeting was adjourned on December 9, 2025, at 7:35 p.m.
LAURA M. NAKAMURA
MAYOR
MONIQUE ROBINSON
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
PECIAL MEETING OF THE
CONCORD CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM
1950 PARKSIDE DRIVE, WING A
CONCORD, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2025
The Concord City Council met in a special meeting in the City Council Conference Room, located at 1950 Parkside Drive, Wing A, Concord, California at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, December 16, 2025, with Mayor Obringer presiding and all Councilmembers present. Minutes follow in abbreviated form per Resolution 3361 and Council Minutes of September 26, 1966.
No public comment was received.
The meeting was recessed and immediately reconvened in a closed session on CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: Area within Concord Community Reuse Plan Agency negotiators: Valerie Barone, City Manager; Guy Bjerke, Director of Economic Development & Base Reuse Negotiating parties: Erica Spinelli, Department of the Navy Under negotiation: Price, Terms of Payment.
ADJOURNMENT
By order of the Mayor, the meeting was adjourned on December 16, 2025, at 5:53 p.m.
LAURA M. NAKAMURA
MAYOR
JOELLE FOCKLER, MMC
CITY CLERK
Ord. No. 25-8 1
ORDINANCE NO. 25-8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE
TITLE 15 (BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS) TO
INCLUDE THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
AND THE 2024 UNIFORM SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB
CODE AND RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE 2025
CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AND 2025 CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-
URBAN INTERFACE CODE CONTAINED IN THE CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY ORDINANCES NO. 2025-14 AND NO. 2025-15
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the 2025 California Building Standards Code becomes effective January 1, 2026, and its adoption is necessary to incorporate it into Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations) and make administrative amendments; and WHEREAS, the City of Concord (“City”) is wholly contained within the geographical boundaries of a legal special district known as the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (“Fire District”), formed pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 13800 et seq; and WHEREAS, the Fire District has responsibility for emergency and medical first-responder services, fire suppression, and fire protection duties within its special district boundary, including within the City of Concord; and
WHEREAS, on October 7, 2025 the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors in its capacity as the Board of Directors of the Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District and the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (“Board”) introduced Ordinance No. 2025-14 and Ordinance No. 2025-15, and made express findings in support of technical amendments to the 2025 California Fire Code and 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code based upon climatic, topographical, and geological conditions (“Findings”), as a first step in adopting the 2025 California Fire Code and 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code with technical amendments, and is anticipated to adopt the 2025 California Fire Code and 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code with technical amendments by adopting Ordinance No. 2025-14 and Ordinance No. 2025-15 and Findings on and November 18, 2025, in advance of the City of Concord’s scheduled second reading of this Ordinance 25-8, currently set for December 2, 2025; and
4.b
Ord. No. 25-8 2
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7(c), the technical amendments are substantially equivalent to changes or modifications that were previously filed by the City of Concord and were in effect as of September 30, 2025. Furthermore, the building standards relate to home hardening and are proposed for adoption by a local fire prevention district pursuant to Section 13869.7; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 13869.7, the legislative body of a city may ratify, modify, or deny a fire protection district-adopted ordinance, and no ordinance adopted by a fire protection district shall be effective within the municipal limits of a city until ratified by the city; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 13869.7, any fire protection district that adopts an ordinance pertaining to building standards related to fire and panic safety that are more stringent than those building standards adopted by the State Fire Marshal shall transmit the adopted ordinance to the jurisdiction where the ordinance will apply; and WHEREAS, the Fire District transmitted Ordinance No. 2025-14 and Ordinance No. 2025-15 and a copy of the Findings to the City in accordance with California Health and Safety Code requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Chief Building Official for the City of Concord has recommended the City Council ratify Ordinance No. 2025-14 and Ordinance No. 2025-15 in their entirety; and WHEREAS, as discussed in the Findings, local climatic, geological, and topographical conditions impact fire prevention efforts, and the frequency, spread, acceleration, intensity, and size of fire involving buildings in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the amendments to the 2025 California Fire Code and California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, as expressed in Ordinance No. 2025-14 and Ordinance No. 2025-15 and as discussed by the Findings, to be reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological and topographical conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the ratification of Ordinance No. 2025-14 and Ordinance No. 2025-15 within the jurisdictional boundary of the City is a
Ord. No. 25-8 3
responsible measure to provide additional reasonable and uniform degrees of fire and life safety to its citizens, businesses and community; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby ratify Ordinance No. 2025-14 and Ordinance No. 2025-15 and adopt the Findings; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 13869.7(h)(1), the City Council does hereby delegate enforcement of Ordinance No. 2025-14 and Ordinance No. 2025-15 within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Concord to the Fire Chief of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District or authorized representative.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively “CEQA”), adoption of the Ordinance does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065, 14 Cal Code Regs. Sections 15060(c), 15273, 15378, as it has no potential for resulting in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and/or the activities consist of creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not constitute a “project”. Even if Council action on this item did constitute a project under CEQA, it falls within the “common sense” exemption set forth in 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” Accordingly, no further environmental review is warranted. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgement and analysis.
Section 2. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter
15.05 (Uniform Administrative Code), Section 15.05.010 (Purpose) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
Ord. No. 25-8 4
15.05.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this Code is to provide for the administration and enforcement of the City of Concord Construction Code. The “City of Concord Construction Code” means, collectively, the following:
(1) Building Code, as adopted in Section 15.10.010.
(2) Electrical Code, as adopted in Section 15.15.010.
(3) Plumbing Code, as adopted in Section 15.20.010.
(4) Mechanical Code, as adopted in Section 15.25.010.
(5) Abatement of Dangerous Buildings Code, as adopted by Section 15.30.010. (6) Housing Code, as adopted in Section 15.35.010.
(7) Residential Building Code, as adopted in Section 15.40.010. (8) Historical Building Code, as adopted in Section 15.42.010. (9) Existing Building Code, as adopted in Section 15.43.010. (10) Green Building Code, as adopted in Section 15.45.010. (11) Energy Code, as adopted in Section 15.47.010.
(12) Existing unreinforced masonry buildings, commencing with Section 15.55.010. (13) Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code, as adopted in Section 15.60.010. (14) Fire Code, as adopted in Section 15.65.010.
(15) Wildland-Urban Interface Code, as adopted in Section 15.67.010. (16) Building security, commencing with Section 15.85.010. (17) Gas shut-off devices, commencing with Section 15.95.010. (18) Vacant buildings, commencing with Section 8.30.010. (19) Such other similar or related codes and regulations required to be administered and/or enforced by the Building Official.
Section 3. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter
15.10 (Building Code) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
Ord. No. 25-8 5
CHAPTER 15.10 BUILDING CODE
15.10.010 Building Code adopted.
The 2025 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volumes 1 and 2, published by the California Building Standards Commission, 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833-2936, with state supplements published from time to time (collectively, “California Building Code”), a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter, subject to the amendments set forth in this chapter.
The California Building Code, as amended in this chapter, shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Building Code” for the City of Concord.
15.10.020 Appendix Adoption.
Appendix I (Patio Covers) of the California Building Code is hereby adopted. All remaining appendices are not adopted.
15.10.030 Administrative Amendments.
The following are administrative amendments to Chapter 1 Division II (Scope and Administration):
(1) Section 101.1 (Title) is hereby revised to read as follows:
101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Building Code of the City of Concord, hereinafter referred to as “this code.”
(2) Section 103.1 (Creation of enforcement agency) is hereby revised to read as follows:
103.1 Creation of enforcement agency. The City of Concord Building Division is hereby created, and the official in charge thereof shall be known as the building official. The function of the agency shall be the implementation, administration and enforcement of the provisions of this code.
(3) Section 104.2.4.1 (Flood hazard areas) is hereby deleted.
Ord. No. 25-8 6
(4) Section 104.3.1 (Determination of substantially improved or substantially damaged existing buildings and structures in flood hazard areas) is hereby deleted. (5) Section 105.3.2 (Time limitation of application) is hereby deleted. (6) Section 105.5 (Expiration) is hereby deleted in its entirety. (7) Section 113 (Means of Appeals) is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Section 4. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter15.15 (Electrical Code) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
CHAPTER 15.15 ELECTRICAL CODE
15.15.010 Electrical Code adopted.
The 2025 California Electrical Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 3, published by the California Building Standards Commission, 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833-2936, with state supplements published from time to time (collectively, “California Electrical Code”), a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter.
The California Electrical Code shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Electrical Code” for the City of Concord.
Section 5. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter
15.20 (Plumbing Code) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
CHAPTER 15.20 PLUMBING CODE
15.20.010 Plumbing Code adopted.
The 2025 California Plumbing Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 5, published by the California Building Standards Commission, 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833-2936, with state supplements published from time to time (collectively, “California Plumbing Code”), a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter, subject to the amendments set forth in this chapter.
Ord. No. 25-8 7
The California Plumbing Code, as amended in this chapter, shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Plumbing Code” for the City of Concord.
15.20.020 Appendix adoption.
Appendices A, B, D, H, and I of the California Plumbing Code are hereby adopted. All remaining appendices are not adopted.
15.20.030 Administrative amendments.
The following are administrative amendments to Chapter 1 Division II (Administration):
(1) The fourth paragraph of Section 104.3.2 (Plan Review Fees) is hereby amended to read:
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional review, a fee shall be charged as set forth in the schedule as established by the applicable governing authority.
(2) Section 104.3.3 (Time Limitation of Application) is hereby deleted. (3) Section 104.4.3 (Expiration) is hereby deleted.
(4) Section 104.4.4 (Extensions) is hereby deleted.
(5) Section 104.5 (Fees) is hereby amended to read:
104.5 Fees. Fees shall be assessed in accordance with the provisions of this section and as set forth in the schedule as established by the applicable governing authority.
(6) The fourth paragraph of Section 105.2.6 (Reinspections) is hereby amended to read:
To obtain reinspection, the applicant shall first pay a reinspection fee as set forth in the schedule as established by the applicable governing authority. (7) Section 107.0 (Board of Appeals) is hereby deleted in its entirety. (8) Table 104.5 (Plumbing Permit Fees) is hereby deleted.
Section 6. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter
15.25 (Mechanical Code) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
Ord. No. 25-8 8
CHAPTER 15.25 MECHANICAL CODE
15.25.010 Mechanical Code adopted.
The 2025 California Mechanical Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 4, published by the California Building Standards Commission, 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833-2936, with state supplements published from time to time (collectively, “California Mechanical Code”), a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter, subject to the amendments set forth in this chapter.
The California Mechanical Code, as amended in this chapter, shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Mechanical Code” for the City of Concord.
15.25.020 Administrative amendments.
The following are administrative amendments to Chapter 1 Division II (Administration):
(1) The fourth paragraph of Section 104.3.2 (Plan Review Fees) is hereby amended to read:
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional review, a fee shall be charged as set forth in the schedule as established by the applicable governing authority.
(2) Section 104.3.3 (Time Limitation of Application) is hereby deleted. (3) Section 104.4.3 (Expiration) is hereby deleted.
(4) Section 104.4.4 (Extensions) is hereby deleted.
(5) Section 104.5 (Fees) is hereby amended to read:
104.5 Fees. Fees shall be assessed in accordance with the provisions of this section and as set forth in the schedule as established by the applicable governing authority.
(6) The fourth paragraph of Section 105.2.6 (Reinspections) is hereby amended to read:
To obtain reinspection, the applicant shall first pay a reinspection fee as set forth in the schedule as established by the applicable governing authority.
Ord. No. 25-8 9
(7) Section 107.0 (Board of Appeals) is hereby deleted in its entirety. (8) Table 104.5 (Mechanical Permit Fees) is hereby deleted.
Section 7. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter
15.40 (Residential Building Code) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
CHAPTER 15.40 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE
15.40.010 Residential Building Code adopted.
The 2025 California Residential Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part
2.5, published by the California Building Standards Commission, 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833-2936, with state supplements published from time to time (collectively, “California Residential Code”), a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter, subject to the amendments set forth in this chapter.
The California Residential Code, as amended in this chapter, shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Residential Building Code” for the City of Concord.
15.40.020 Appendix adoption.
Appendix BF (Patio Covers) of the California Residential Code is hereby adopted. All remaining appendices are not adopted.
15.40.030 Administrative amendments.
The following are administrative amendments to Chapter 1 Division II (Administration):
(1) Section R101.1 (Title) is hereby revised to read as follows:
R101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Residential Code for One- and Two-family Dwellings of the City of Concord and shall be cited as such and will be referred to herein as “this code.”
(2) Section R102.6 (Existing structures) is hereby revised to read as follows:
R102.6 Existing structures. The legal occupancy of any structure existing on the date of adoption of this code shall be permitted to be to continue without change, except as is specifically covered in this code, the California Existing Building Code or
Ord. No. 25-8 10
the California Fire Code, or as is deemed necessary by the building official for the general safety and welfare of the occupants and the public. (3) Section R103.1 (Creation of agency) is hereby revised to read as follows:
R103.1 Creation of agency. The City of Concord Building Division is hereby created, and the official in charge thereof shall be known as the building official. The function of the agency shall be the implementation, administration and enforcement of the provisions of this code.
(4) Section R104.2.3.1 (Flood hazard areas) is hereby deleted. (5) Section R104.3.1 (Determination of substantially improved or substantially damaged existing buildings in flood hazard areas) is hereby deleted. (6) Section R105.3.2 (Time limitation of application) is hereby deleted. (7) Section R105.5 (Expiration) is hereby deleted in its entirety. (8) Section R112 (Means of Appeals) is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Section 8. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter
15.42 (Historical Building Code) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
CHAPTER 15.42 HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE
15.42.010 Historical Building Code adopted.
The 2025 California Historical Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 8, published by the California Building Standards Commission, 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833-2936, with state supplements published from time to time (collectively, “California Historical Code”), a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter.
The California Historical Building Code shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Historical Building Code” for the City of Concord.
Section 9. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter
15.43 (Existing Building Code) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
Ord. No. 25-8 11
CHAPTER 15.43 EXISTING BUILDING CODE
15.43.010 Existing Building Code adopted.
The 2025 California Existing Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 10, published by the California Building Standards Commission, 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833-2936, with state supplements published from time to time (collectively, “California Existing Building Code”), a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter, subject to the amendments set forth in this chapter.
The California Existing Building Code, as amended in this chapter, shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Existing Building Code” for the City of Concord.
15.43.020 Appendix Adoption.
Appendix A (Guidelines for the Seismic Retrofit of Existing Buildings) of the California Existing Building Code is hereby adopted. All remaining appendices are not adopted.
15.43.030 Administrative Amendments.
The following are administrative amendments to Chapter 1 Division II (Scope and Administration):
(1) Section 101.1 (Title) is hereby revised to read as follows:
101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Existing Building Code of the City of Concord, hereinafter referred to as “this code.” (2) Section 101.4.2 (Buildings previously occupied) is hereby revised to read as follows:
101.4.2 Buildings previously occupied. The legal occupancy of any building existing on the date of adoption of this code shall be permitted to continue without change, except as is specifically covered in this code, the California Fire Code, or as is deemed necessary by the code official for the general safety and welfare of the occupants and the public.
Ord. No. 25-8 12
(3) Section 103.1 (Creation of agency) is hereby revised to read as follows:
103.1 Creation of agency. The City of Concord Building Division is hereby created, and the official in charge thereof shall be known as the code official. The function of the agency shall be the implementation, administration and enforcement of the provisions of this code.
(4) Section 104.2.4.1 (Flood hazard areas) is hereby deleted. (5) Section R104.3.1 (Determination of substantially improved or substantially damaged existing buildings and structures in flood hazard areas) is hereby deleted. (6) Section 105.3.2 (Time limitation of application) is hereby deleted. (7) Section 105.5 (Expiration) is hereby deleted in its entirety. (8) Section 112 (Means of Appeals) is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Section 10. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter
15.45 (Green Building Standards Code) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
CHAPTER 15.45 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
15.45.010 Green Building Standards Code adopted.
The 2025 California Green Building Standards Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11, published by the California Building Standards Commission, 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833-2936, with state supplements published from time to time (collectively, “California Green Building Standards Code”), a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter.
The California Green Building Standards Code shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Green Building Standards Code” for the City of Concord.
Section 11. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter
15.47 (Energy Code) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
Ord. No. 25-8 13
CHAPTER 15.47 ENERGY CODE
15.47.010 Energy Code adopted.
The 2025 California Energy Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6, published by the California Building Standards Commission, 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833-2936, with state supplements published from time to time (collectively, “California Energy Code”), a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter.
The California Energy Code shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Energy Code” for the City of Concord.
Section 12. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter 15.60 (Swimming Pool, Spa, and Hot Tub Code) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
CHAPTER 15.60 SWIMMING POOL, SPA, AND HOT TUB CODE
15.60.010 Swimming Pool, Spa, and Hot Tub Code adopted.
The 2024 Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa, and Hot Tub Code published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, 4755 E. Philadelphia Street, Ontario, CA 91761-2816, a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter, subject to the amendments set forth in this chapter.
The Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa, and Hot Tub Code, as amended in this chapter, shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Swimming Pool, Spa, and Hot Tub Code” for the City of Concord.
15.60.020 Administrative Amendments.
The following are administrative amendments to Chapter 1 (Administration):
(1) The fourth paragraph of Section 104.3.2 (Plan Review Fees) is hereby amended to read:
Ord. No. 25-8 14
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional review, a fee shall be charged as set forth in the schedule as established by the applicable governing authority.
(2) Section 104.3.3 (Time Limitation of Application) is hereby deleted. (3) Section 104.4.3 (Expiration) is hereby deleted.
(4) Section 104.4.4 (Extension) is hereby deleted.
(5) Section 104.5 (Fees) is hereby amended to read:
104.5 Fees. Fees shall be assessed in accordance with the provisions of this section and as set forth in the schedule as established by the applicable governing authority.
(6) The fourth paragraph of Section 105.2.6 (Reinspections) is hereby amended to read:
To obtain reinspection, the applicant shall first pay a reinspection fee as set forth in the schedule as established by the applicable governing authority. (7) Section 107.0 (Board of Appeals) is hereby deleted in its entirety. (8) Table 104.5 (Swimming Pool, Spa, and Hot Tub Permit Fees) is hereby deleted.
Section 13. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Chapter
15.65 (Fire Code) is hereby amended in its entirety and restated to read as follows:
CHAPTER 15.65 FIRE CODE
15.65.010 Fire Code adopted.
The 2025 California Fire Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 9, published by the California Building Standards Commission, 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833-2936, with state supplements published from time to time (collectively, “California Fire Code”), a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter, subject to the amendments set forth in this chapter.
The California Fire Code, as amended in this chapter, shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Fire Code” for the City of Concord.
Ord. No. 25-8 15
15.65.020 Administrative Amendments.
The following are administrative amendments to Chapter 1 Division II (Scope and Administration):
(1) Section 101.1 (Title) is hereby revised to read as follows:
101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Fire Code of the City of Concord, hereinafter referred to as “this code.”
(2) Section 103.1 (Creation of agency) is hereby revised to read as follows:
103.1 Creation of agency. The Contra Costa County Fire Protection District is hereby created, and the official in charge thereof shall be known as the fire code official. The function of the agency shall be the implementation, administration and enforcement of the provisions of this code.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City of Concord hereby reserves to its Chief Building Official the ability (but not the obligation) to enforce the provisions of this code.
(3) Section 105.2.3 (Time limitation of application) is hereby deleted. (4) Section 105.3.1 (Expiration) is hereby deleted in its entirety. (5) Section 112 (Means of Appeals) is hereby deleted in its entirety.
15.65.030 Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Ordinance adopted.
Ordinance 2025-14 of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District is hereby ratified by the City Council under the authority of California Health and Safety Code § 13869.7. Ordinance 2025-14 adopts the 2025 California Fire Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 9, including Chapters 1-12 and 20-80, Appendix B, Appendix C, Appendix D, Appendix F, Appendix H, Appendix I, Appendix J, Appendix K, and Appendix P), as amended by the changes, additions, and deletions set forth in the ordinance. The provisions of the 2025 California Fire Code as amended by District Ordinance 2025-14 shall be controlling and enforceable within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Concord.
Ord. No. 25-8 16
15.65.040 Delegation of enforcement to Fire Chief.
Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code § 13869.7, the City Council delegates enforcement of Ordinance 2025-14 to the Fire Chief of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District or his or her authorized representatives.
Section 14. Concord Municipal Code Title 15 (Building and Building Regulations) is hereby amended by adding Chapter 15.67 (Wildland-Urban Interface Code) as follows:
CHAPTER 15.67 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE
15.67.010 Wildland-Urban Interface Code adopted.
The 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 7, published by the California Building Standards Commission, 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833-2936, with state supplements published from time to time (collectively, “California Wildland-Urban Interface Code”), a copy of which is filed in the office of the Building Official, is hereby adopted and referred to, and by this reference, expressly incorporated and made a part of this chapter as though fully set forth in this chapter, subject to the amendments set forth in this chapter.
The California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, as amended in this chapter, shall be known, designated and referred to as the “Wildland-Urban Interface Code” for the City of Concord.
15.67.020 Administrative Amendments.
The following are administrative amendments to Chapter 1 Division II (Scope and Administration):
(1) Section 101.1 (Title) is hereby revised to read as follows:
101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Wildland-Urban Interface Code of the City of Concord, hereinafter referred to as “this code.” (2) Section 103.1 (Creation of agency) is hereby revised to read as follows:
103.1 Creation of agency. The Contra Costa County Fire Protection District is hereby created, and the official in charge thereof shall be known as the fire code
Ord. No. 25-8 17
official. The function of the agency shall be the implementation, administration and enforcement of the provisions of this code.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City of Concord hereby reserves to its Chief Building Official the ability (but not the obligation) to enforce the provisions of this code.
(3) Section 105.4.2 (Time limitation of application) is hereby deleted. (4) Section 105.8 (Expiration) is hereby deleted in its entirety. (5) Section 112 (Means of Appeals) is hereby deleted in its entirety.
15.67.030 Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Ordinance adopted.
Ordinance 2025-15 of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District is hereby ratified by the City Council under the authority of California Health and Safety Code § 13869.7. Ordinance 2025-15 adopts the 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 7, including Chapters 1-7, Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C, Appendix F, Appendix G, and Appendix H), as amended by the changes, additions, and deletions set forth in the ordinance. The provisions of the 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code as amended by District Ordinance 2025-15 shall be controlling and enforceable within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Concord.
15.67.040 Delegation of enforcement to Fire Chief.
Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code § 13869.7, the City Council delegates enforcement of Ordinance 2025-15 to the Fire Chief of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District or his or her authorized representatives.
Section 15. Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7(c), the technical amendments are substantially equivalent to changes or modifications that were previously filed by the City of Concord and were in effect as of September 30, 2025. Furthermore, the building standards relate to home hardening and are proposed for adoption by a local fire prevention district pursuant to Section 13869.7.
Section 16. If any section, subsection, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or
Ord. No. 25-8 18
unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase be declared invalid.
Section 17. This Ordinance No. 25-8 shall become effective (30) days following its passage and adoption; provided, however, that the portion of this Ordinance 25-8 ratifying and adopting Ordinance No. 2025-14 and Ordinance No. 2025-15 and the Findings shall become effective on the later of the effective date of (a) the Board’s adoption of Ordinance No. 2025-14 and Ordinance No. 2025-15 and the Findings, or (b) this Ordinance 25-8. In the event a summary of said Ordinance is published in lieu of the entire Ordinance, a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to its adoption and within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, including the vote of the Councilmembers. Additionally, a summary prepared by the City Attorney’s Office shall be published once at least five (5) days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance and once within fifteen (15) days after its passage and adoption, including the vote of the Councilmembers, in the East Bay Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Concord.
Laura Nakamura
Mayor
ATTEST:
Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
(Seal)
Ord. No. 25-8 19
Ordinance No. 25-8 was duly and regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord held on November 4, 2025, and was thereafter duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord on January 13, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers -
NOES: Councilmembers -
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers -
ABSENT: Councilmembers -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an ordinance duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Concord, California.
Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
Staff Report
Date: January 13, 2026
To: City Council
From: Valerie J. Barone, City Manager
Reviewed by: Mindy Gentry, Director of Community Development Carlton Thompson, PE, City Engineer
Bruce Davis, PE, CIP Manager
Prepared by: Tianjun Cao, PE, Associate Civil Engineer
[email protected]
(925) 671-3243
Subject: Considering the following actions for the Rocketship/ Glenbrook Sidewalk Gap Closure Project:
1. Adoption of a Resolution approving a request to
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for an
allocation of $208,000 of Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Project Funding for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 to support the Rocketship/Glenbrook Sidewalk Gap Closure, located on Olivera Road between Hillsborough Drive and Thunderbird Drive; and
2. Authorizing the City Manager to accept and appropriate grant funding from MTC up to $208,000 and execute all
necessary documents in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney.
CEQA: Not a project/exempt per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061 (b)(2), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15282(j), 15378, 15301, 15302, 15303, 15304, Public Resources Code Section 21065, and/or 21080.19.
4.c4.c4.c4.c
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.c
January 13, 2026
Report in Brief
On October 9, 2025, Contra Costa County Public Works Department issued a call for projects to local agencies in the county for the FY 2026-2027 Transportation Development Act Article 3 (TDA) grant cycle. TDA funds are available for bicycle and pedestrian projects that eliminate or improve an identified problem area on routes that would otherwise provide relatively safe and direct travel by bicycles or pedestrians.
Each agency in Contra Costa County may submit one project for consideration.
At its meeting on December 10, 2025, the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) recommended submitting a TDA grant application in the amount of $208,000 to design and construct the Rocketship/Glenbrook Sidewalk Gap Closure (Project), located on Olivera Road between Hillsborough Drive and Thunderbird Drive.
Recommended Action
1. Adopt a Resolution approving a request to Metropolitan Transportation Commission for an allocation of $208,000 of Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Project Funding for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 to support the Rocketship/Glenbrook Sidewalk Gap Closure, located on Olivera Road between Hillsborough Drive and Thunderbird Drive (Attachment 2);
2. Authorize the City Manager to accept and appropriate grant funding from MTC up to $208,000 and execute all necessary documents in a form acceptable to City Attorney; and
3. Make the CEQA determinations as provided in this staff report.
Background
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the agency that administers the TDA grant program and each year releases a call for bicycle and pedestrian projects to be funded with TDA grant funds. Eligible projects are described as projects that eliminate or improve an identified problem area (specific safety hazards such as high- traffic narrow roadways or barriers to travel) on routes that would otherwise provide relatively safe and direct bicycle or pedestrian travel use, and projects ready for design and construction. Each agency in Contra Costa County may submit one project for consideration.
On October 9, 2025, a call for projects was issued by Contra Costa County Public Works Department to local agencies for the 2026-2027 TDA cycle in advance of solicitation by MTC. MTC has not yet released the estimated allocation for Contra Costa County for the FY 2026-2027 grant cycle; however, last year’s total allocation for Contra Costa County was approximately $1,100,000.
MTC Resolution No. 4108 specifies that each county and city is required to have a Bicycle Advisory Committee to review and prioritize bicycle and pedestrian projects that
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.c
January 13, 2026
are applying for TDA Article 3 grant funds, and to participate in the development and review of comprehensive bicycle plans. The City’s BPAC fulfills this grant requirement.
Analysis
The City of Concord Bicycle, Pedestrian & Safe Routes to Transit Plan (Plan), adopted by City Council on September 27, 2016, recommends sidewalk gap closure work on Olivera Road between Hillsborough Drive and Thunderbird Drive. City staff has reviewed the recommendations of the Plan and proposes to submit an application to design and construct the Project.
On December 10, 2025, BPAC recommended in favor of submitting a TDA grant application in the amount of $208,000 to design and construct the Project.
Proposed improvements for the Project include two sidewalk gap closures, one American with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramp, two driveway aprons with the appropriate driveway transitions, and a high-visibility crosswalk on Sanford Street at Olivera Road. The Project will complement the previously installed Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) and curb ramps at the intersection of Sanford Street and Olivera Road.
The total estimated costs for design and construction is $260,000. The City’s application is requesting $208,000 (80% of project costs) be funded by the TDA grant, and the remaining $52,000 (20% of project costs) provided as the City’s local match requirement. If the grant is awarded, staff expects design to begin in December 2026 and construction to begin in late 2027.
Financial Impact
The Project is dependent upon the receipt of grant funds. The TDA funds will cover $208,000, with the City matching 20% ($52,000) from local funds, for a total cost of $260,000. The local match funding source and project number will be identified at the time of the new Capital Budget adoption in June 2026.
Environmental Determination
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. Seq. as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Environmental Quality Act (collectively “CEQA”), submission of the application for grant funds and allocating those funds do not constitute a “project” within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065, 14 Cal Code Regs. Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, as it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and/or the activities consist of creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not constitute a “project”. Even if the submission of the grant application and allocation of those funds did constitute a project under CEQA, it falls within the “common sense” exemption set forth in 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.c
January 13, 2026
15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” In the alternative, the grant application and allocation of funds is statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.19 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(j) (Restriping of Streets), and has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(2) due the following exemptions: 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction), 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), and/or 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land) because, among other things, it involves minor alterations to existing streets, and construction of a limited number of new small facilities or structures, all as further detailed in this staff report, the resolution, and attachments hereto. No unusual circumstances exist and none of the exceptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies. Therefore, no further environmental review is warranted. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgement. Staff will file a Notice of Exemption (NOE) following approval of this agenda item, as the NOE is required as part of the grant application process.
Public Contact
The City Council Agenda was posted.
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Resolution Authorizing the Application for TDA Grant Funds including Exhibit A: Findings
Exhibit B: TDA Article 3 Project Application Form (with attachments)
Attachment 1
Rocketship/Glenbrook Sidewalk Gap Closure
Location Map
Res No. 26-XX 1
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A Resolution Approving a Request to the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission by the City
of Concord for an Allocation of $208,000 of
Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian
and Bicycle Project Funding for Fiscal Year 2026-27
for the Rocketship/Glenbrook Sidewalk Gap Closure
Project, Located on Olivera Road between
Hillsborough Drive and Thunderbird Drive Resolution No. 26-XX /
WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay Region, has adopted MTC Resolution No. 4108, entitled “Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian and Bicycle Projects,” which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of “TDA Article 3” funding; and
WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 4108 requires that requests for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each county in the San Francisco Bay Area.
WHEREAS, the City of Concord desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funds to support the project described in Attachment B to this resolution at the requested or approved amount, which is for the exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2025, the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee recommended submitting the TDA grant application.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Res No. 26-XX 2
Section 1. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. Seq. as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Environmental Quality Act (collectively “CEQA”), submission of the application for grant funds and allocating those funds do not constitute a “project” within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065, 14 Cal Code Regs. Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, as it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and/or the activities consist of creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not constitute a “project”. Even if the submission of the grant application and allocation of those funds did constitute a project under CEQA, it falls within the “common sense” exemption set forth in 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.”
In the alternative, the grant application and allocation of funds is statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.19 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(j) (Restriping of Streets), and has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(2) due the following exemptions: 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction), 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), and/or 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land) because, among other things, it involves minor alterations to existing streets, and construction of a limited number of new small facilities or structures, all as further detailed in the staff report, this resolution, and attachments hereto. No unusual circumstances exist and none of the exceptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies. Therefore, no further environmental review is warranted. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgement.
Section 2. The City of Concord declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code.
Section 3. There is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project described in Attachment B to this Resolution, or that might impair the ability of the City of Concord to carry out the project.
Res No. 26-XX 3
Section 4. The project has been reviewed by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) of City of Concord.
Section 5. The City of Concord attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment A to this Resolution.
Section 6. A certified copy of this Resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments, as the case may be, of Contra Costa County for submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim.
Section 7. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager and/or her designee to negotiate and execute such other documents related to the request and/or acceptance of the TDA funds subject to City Attorney approval.
Section 8. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. //
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
Res No. 26-XX 4
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Concord on January 13, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers -
NOES: Councilmembers -
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers -
ABSENT: Councilmembers -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-XX was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord on January 13, 2026.
Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Susanne Meyer Brown
City Attorney
Attachments: Exhibit A - Findings
Exhibit B - TDA Article 3 Project Application Form (with attachments)
November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 4
Resolution No. 26-XX
Exhibit A
Re: Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding Findings
1. That the City of Concord is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is the City of Concord legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in “Attachment B” of this resolution.
2. That the City of Concord has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s) described in Attachment B.
3. A review of the project(s) descri bed in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s).
4. Issues attendant to securing en vironmental and right-of-way permits and clearances for the projects described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested.
5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comp ly with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).
6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s).
7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or final design and engineering or quick build project; and/or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to motorized traffic and/or Class IV separated bikeway; and/or for the purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and/or for the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the City of Concord within the prior five fiscal years.
8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B whic h are bicycle projects have been included in a detailed bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or included in an adopted comprehensive bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of the California Bikeways Act, Streets and Highways Code section 2370 et seq.) or responds to an immediate community need, such as a quick-build project.
9. That any project described in Attachment B bicycl e project meets the mandatory minimum safety design criteria published in the California Highway Design Manual or is in a National Association of City and Transportation Officials (NACTO) guidance or similar best practices document.
10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B will be co mpleted in the allocated time (fiscal year of allocation plus two additional fiscal years).
11. That the City of Concord agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public.
November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 5
Resolution No. 26-XX p a g e 2 of 4
Exhibit B
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
1. Agency City of Concord
2. Primary Contact Tianjun Cao, Associate Civil Engineer
3. Mailing Address 1950 Parkside Dr, MS/40, Concord, CA 94519
4. Email Address [email protected] 5. Phone Number
925-671-3243
6. Secondary Contact
(in the event
primary is not
available)
Carlton Thompson, City Engineer
7. Mailing address (if
different) N/A☐
8. Email Address [email protected] 9. Phone Number
925-671-3182
10. Send allocation
instructions to (if
different from
above):
11. Project Title Rocketship/Glenbrook Sidewalk Gap Closure
12. Amount requested $260,000 13. Fiscal Year of
Claim
26/27
14. Description of Overall Project:
15. Project Scope Proposed for Funding: (Project level environmental, preliminary planning, and ROW are ineligible uses of TDA funds.)
The project proposes to construct two sidewalk gap closures, one ADA compliant curb ramp, two residential driveways, and miscellaneous striping on Olivera Road between Hillsborough Drive and Thunderbird Drive.
PS&E and CON
November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 6
16. Project Location: A map of the project location is attached or a link to a online map of the project location is provided below:
Project Relation to Regional Policies (for information only)
17. Is the project in an Equity Priority Community? Y e s ☐ No ☒
18. Is this project in a Priority Development Area or a Transit-Oriented Community? Yes ☐ No ☒
19. Project Budget and Schedule
Project Eligibility
A. Has the project been reviewed by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee? Yes ☒ No ☐ If “YES,” identify the date and provide a copy or link to the agenda. 12/10/2025 If "NO," provide an explanation).
Project Phase TDA 3 Other Funds Total Cost Estimated Completion (month/year)
Bike/Ped Plan
ENV
PA&ED
PS&E $42,625 $10,656 $53,281 8/1/2027
ROW
CON $165,375 $41,344 $206,719 12/1/2027
Total Cost $208,000 $52,000 $260,000
November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 7
B. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? Yes ☒ No ☐ If "NO," provide expected date:__________________
C. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? Yes ☐ No ☒ (If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page)
D. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria Yes ☒ No ☐ pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual?
E. 1. Is the project categorically exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CCR Section 15301(c), Yes ☒ No ☐ Existing Facility?
2. If “NO” above, is the project is exempt from CEQA for another reason? Yes ☐ No ☐ Cite the basis for the exemption. __________________________ N/A☐ If the project is not exempt, please check “NO,” and provide environmental documentation, as appropriate.
F. Estimated Completion Date of project (month and year): ____December 2027___
G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has Yes ☒ No ☐ the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility, please identify below and provide the agreement.
H. Is a Complete Streets Checklist required for this project? Yes ☐ No ☒ If the amount requested is over $250,000 or if the total project phase or construction phase is over $250,000, a Complete Streets checklist is likely required. Please attach the Complete Streets checklist or record of review, as applicable. More information and the form may be found here: https://mtc.ca.gov/planning/transportation/complete-streets
Staff Report
Date: January 13, 2026
To: City Council
From: Valerie J. Barone, City Manager
Reviewed by: Mindy Gentry, Director of Community Development Aaron Sage, Planning Manager
Frank Abejo, Principal Planner
Prepared by: Scott Watkins, Associate Planner
[email protected]
(925) 671-3128
Subject: Considering the recommendation of the Council Committee on Housing and Economic Development to defer the
implementation of Objective 4.7 of the 2023-2031 Housing Element to facilitate affordable housing development on property owned by public educational agencies.
CEQA: Exempt/not a project pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Sections
15060(c)(2), 15061(b)(3), and/or 15378.
Report in Brief
Under the 2023-2031 Housing Element (“Housing Element”) Objective 4.7, the City planned to adopt an ordinance by December 2025 to “facilitate affordable housing development on property owned by public educational agencies.” For the reasons discussed in this report, the Council Committee on Housing and Economic Development (“HED Committee” or “Committee”; Hoffmeister/Obringer) recommends deferring implementation of this objective until such time local educational agencies have more advanced proposals or interest in developing housing on their properties.
Recommended Action
Defer implementation of Housing Element Objective 4.7 regarding the facilitation of housing development on property owned by public educational agencies, due to the
4.d
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.d
January 13, 2026
lack of specific interest or more developed proposals from educational agencies, and make the CEQA determinations as provided in this report.
Background
Housing Element Objective 4.7
Under Housing Element Objective 4.7 (“Objective” or “Objective 4.7”), the City planned to “Adopt an ordinance to facilitate housing development on property owned by educational agencies [publicly owned sites] by December 2025.” The narrative for this Objective further states that such facilitation will include “expedited processing of such projects,” and that the ordinance “will allow density of at least 30 dwelling units per acre and will require at least 30% of units to be offered for lower income-earning households.”
Objective 4.7 was included to encourage affordable housing development on underutilized publicly owned educational land. Unlike many other programs in the Housing Element, implementation of this Objective is highly dependent on the voluntary participation and development interest of public educational agencies that control the property.
Senate Bill 4
Senate Bill (SB) 4, the Affordable Housing on Faith and Higher Education Lands Act of 2023, requires local jurisdictions to allow qualifying affordable housing developments by right on any land owned by an “independent institution of higher education or religious institution.” The term “independent institutions of higher education” is defined as “nonpublic higher education institutions that grant undergraduate or graduate degrees and are formed as nonprofit corporations in California” (i.e., nonprofit private colleges or universities). By contrast, Objective 4.7 is limited to publicly owned sites; therefore, SB 4 does not implement this program. Moreover, according to County Assessor data, there is no private college or university property in Concord1.
HED Committee Recommendation
On November 3, 2025, the HED Committee recommended taking no further action at this time to implement Objective 4.7 based on the following information.
Lack of Interest from Educational Agencies
Three educational agencies currently own and operate properties in Concord:
• Mount Diablo Unified School District (MDUSD) operates 28 schools in Concord; • California State University East Bay (CSUEB) owns and operates the CSUEB Concord Center at 4700 Ygnacio Valley Road; and
1 Unitek College, located at 1401 Willow Pass Road, leases its space and does not own the property. In addition, Unitek is a for-profit college which makes it ineligible to apply for a housing development project under SB 4.
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.d
January 13, 2026
• Contra Costa County Board of Education operates the Floyd I. Marchus Counseling and Education Program for students with emotional and behavioral needs at 2900 Avon Avenue.
Staff contacted these entities to determine their level of interest and timing in pursuing housing development on their properties in Concord. The entities have responded as follows:
• MDUSD indicated they have no current interest in housing development on their properties.
• CSUEB indicated they are in the very early, preliminary stages of gathering information on potential housing development at their Concord campus, including senior housing. Currently they are performing outreach to potential development partners and have released a Request for Information regarding development feasibility and potential. They’ve also stated that they are open to discussing with the City “any policy actions or funding opportunities that might help incentivize development at our site.” Given that CSUEB is at the very beginning of gathering information regarding development concepts, it will likely be years before they are prepared to discuss and submit an application for a specific housing development, and any housing built on the CSUEB site would be completed after the current Housing Element cycle that ends in January 2031. • The County Board of Education has not responded to multiple inquiries regarding their interest in pursuing housing development at the 2900 Avon Avenue site.
State Reporting
Any City action related to Objective 4.7 will be documented in the Annual Progress Report that is submitted by April 1 of each year to the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
Staff does not anticipate that HCD will consider a delay in implementation of Objective
4.7 to warrant enforcement action, as the adoption of an ordinance would not create additional housing within the current Housing Element cycle, as discussed above.
Accordingly, staff believes that HCD will concur that the City’s limited staff resources should be allocated toward programs with greater potential to generate tangible housing outcomes.
When there is more specific interest from a public educational agency in developing housing, staff will bring the matter to the Council for consideration. This could be done either as a study session on a proposed General Plan / Zoning Amendment for the CSUEB site (the typical process for a development that requires land use policy changes), or, if multiple agencies have expressed interest in housing development, as part of a Development Code amendment that applies to multiple educational sites. In
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.d
January 13, 2026
either case, staff will continue to support CSUEB, and any other educational agencies interested in developing housing on their properties consistent with Objective 4.7.
Financial Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
Environmental Determination
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. Seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively “CEQA”), the proposed action to defer implementation of Housing Element Objective 4.7 does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and/or 15378, because the action does not have the potential to result in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Even if Council action on this item did constitute a project under CEQA, it falls within the “common sense” exemption set forth in 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.”
Accordingly, no further environmental review is required. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.
Public Contact
The agenda has been posted and notice of this meeting was sent by e-mail to all individuals on the housing interested parties list, MDUSD, CSUEB and Contra Costa County Board of Education.
Staff Report
Date: January 13, 2026
To: City Council
From: Valerie J. Barone, City Manager
Prepared by: Colleen Awad, Community Relations Manager
[email protected]
(925) 671-3272
Subject: Considering authorizing the Mayor to sign and submit a Letter of Support to Congressman DeSaulnier designating the United States Postal Service office building located at 2121 Meridian Park Boulevard in Concord, California, as the "Carl Jefferson Post Office Building" (H.R. 6849).
Report in Brief
Congressman DeSaulnier requested that the Council take a support position on his bill, H.R. 6849, to designate the United States Post Office building located at 2121 Meridian Park Boulevard in Concord, California, as the "Carl Jefferson Post Office Building.” Given Mr. Jefferson’s significant positive impact on Concord, staff has drafted a letter of support for Council action (Attachment 1).
Recommended Action
Authorize the Mayor to sign and submit a letter of support for HR Bill 6849.
Background/Analysis
Congressman DeSaulnier requested that the Concord City Council take a support position on his bill, H.R. 6849, to designate the United States Postal Service building located at 2121 Meridian Park Boulevard in Concord, California, as the "Carl Jefferson Post Office Building.”
Supporting the designation of a postal facility is not covered in the City of Concord’s Legislative Advocacy Program and Platform (Police & Procedure 178). Therefore, in order to submit a Letter of Support, approval of the City Council is required.
4.e4.e4.e
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.e
January 13, 2026
Carl Jefferson is recognized for his extraordinary contributions to the jazz industry and for his role in establishing Concord as a music destination. Wikipedia1 notes that Mr.
Jefferson established a successful auto dealership, Jefferson Motors, on Willow Pass Road in Concord in the late 1950’s, and in 1969 he organized a jazz festival, the Concord Summer Festival, held at Concord Community Park. The festival was later renamed the Concord Jazz Festival. Mr. Jefferson is credited as a key civic leader backing the City’s development of the Concord Pavilion; eventually, the Concord Jazz Festival relocated to the Pavilion. In the early 1970’s, Mr. Jefferson founded Concord Records in Concord, serving hundreds of artists. Mr. Jefferson also served in the U.S.
Army during World War II, including D-Day, and in the Korean War2.
Given Mr. Jefferson’s significant positive impact on Concord, staff has drafted a letter of support for Council action.
Financial Impact
Fiscal impact – none
Public Contact
The City Council Agenda was posted. The Concord Historical Society notified.
Attachment
1. Letter of Support to Congressman DeSaulnier
1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Jefferson
2 https://cowellian.wordpress.com/references/obituaries/jefferson-carl/
January 13, 2026
The Honorable Mark DeSaulnier
U.S. House of Representatives
2134 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Re: Letter of Support to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2121 Meridian Park Boulevard in Concord, California, as the "Carl Jefferson Post Office Building"
Dear Congressman DeSaulnier,
On behalf of the City of Concord, I am writing to extend our support for H.R. 6849 to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2121 Meridian Park Boulevard in Concord, California, as the "Carl Jefferson Post Office Building.” Carl Jefferson was the founder of the Concord Jazz Festival, Concord Jazz Records, and a lifelong devotee of jazz music. He played a central role in shaping Concord’s jazz heritage and cultural identity. He was a successful businessman who owned and operated a thriving Lincoln– Mercury dealership in Concord. Although a loyal jazz fan and avid record collector, Mr. Jefferson aspired to do more than just enjoy the music. In 1969, he organized the first Concord Jazz Festival at what is now Dave Brubeck Park.
The inaugural festival drew more than 17,000 jazz enthusiasts, immediately establishing Concord as a destination for jazz. Six years later, Mr. Jefferson expanded his impact on the jazz community by founding Concord Jazz Records. The label quickly gained international recognition for its commitment to jazz.
Following the success of the record label, he advocated for a permanent venue for the annual jazz festival. He successfully persuaded City officials to support the development of an outdoor amphitheater. That venue, now known as the Toyota Pavilion at Concord, celebrated 50 years of music in 2025 and is an extraordinary cultural asset to the community.
For these reasons, the City of Concord voted unanimously at the January 13, 2026, public Council meeting to submit this letter to you proudly honoring Mr. Jefferson for his extraordinary contributions to the jazz industry and for his role in establishing Concord as a recognized music destination. Naming a post office in his honor would be a fitting and lasting recognition of these achievements.
Once again, the City is happy to support H.R. 6849 to honor Carl Jefferson. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Laura M. Nakamura
Mayor
cc: Concord City Council
Valerie Barone, City Manager
Justin Ezell, Assistant City Manager
Joelle Fockler, City Clerk
Attachment 1
From: Barone, Valerie <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:47 AM
To: Hope Johnson <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>; Ezell, Justin <[email protected]>; Brown, Susanne <[email protected]>; Awad, Colleen <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: opposition to Item 4e re Council meeting 1/13/26 Hope,
I wanted to acknowledge your two e-mails on item 4e on tonight’s Council agenda, a letter in support of Congressmember DeSaulnier’s efforts to rename the Concord post office after Carl Jefferson.
Both your e-mails, including this response to you, will be published later today as part of the packet for tonight’s Council meeting.
The mayor intends to remove this item from the agenda at tonight’s Council meeting to allow the City an opportunity to review the issues you raise prior to Council being asked to endorse the letter.
Additionally, I encourage you to reach out to Congressman DeSaulneir’s office with your concerns.
Please let me know if you have questions.
Valerie
Valerie Barone, City Manager (she/her/hers)
City of Concord | Website: www.cityofconcord.org
( (925) 671-3150 | * [email protected]
1950 Parkside Drive, MS/01, Concord, CA 94519
Subscribe to our City News e-newsletter to stay informed about what's happening in your community!
Benched Correspondence
Agenda Item No. 4.e
January 13, 2026
From: Hope Johnson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:55 PM
To: Benavente, Pablo <[email protected]> Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>; Barone, Valerie <[email protected]>; Ezell, Justin <[email protected]> Subject: Re: opposition to Item 4e re Council meeting 1/13/26 Hi Councilmember Benavente:
Thank you for following up. Unfortunately, I have no documentation and I am no longer in contact with any witnesses. But, I was around for a few years and witnessed the behavior. I am aware this is not hard evidence yet I could not remain silent in good conscience.
It was a long time ago. I worked at Concord Records in 1989 and Carl "Jeff" Jefferson passed away in 1995. The culture was different back then. Few people filed formal verbal or written complaints. Even today, few employees or artists in the music industry complain publicly so that they can keep their jobs and recording contracts.
The employee referenced in my previous email was my close friend who was the warehouse manager at Concord Records for years. He passed away in 2014 (many City Hall regulars know that I still drive his old truck around). I met him at Concord Records and can still recall Jeff asking me if I had "met his Injun yet. " "Injun" was a nickname Jeff used for my friend for years in reference to his Native American ancestry. I recall these types of harmful stereotypes were a common part of his vocabulary.
I worked for Concord Record's Vice President who was well liked. She was the person most people wanted to deal with to avoid Jeff and I fielded many calls from people who really wanted to be able to reach her instead of him. In my opinion, this was partially because Jeff was so abrasive and narcissistic and partially because he was often very disrespectful. Again, I cannot provide you with documentation or witnesses other than my own experience. I did remain in contact with the Vice President off and on but she passed away in 2019.
I stand by my allegations, at least for the time I knew people at Concord Records until Jeff passed away. However, I cannot prove them to you with documentation or witnesses at this time.
This is not intended to take away from Carl Jefferson's contributions to Concord. I am saddened that he would be honored on one of Concord's busy locations, a business that he had no connection to, knowing how I saw him treat people. It's not uncommon for cities and states to honor wealthy landowners who contributed to the community, even when their personal behavior doesn't warrant it, but there must be others more deserving to have their name on our large Post Office. At some point, we will need to honor those we know did not lean toward harmful stereotypes and narcissism if we intend to heal the growing divisions in our communities.
It's unfortunate that this honor seems to elevate Carl Jefferson in general as a role model in a way that is unconnected to any specific contributions he made to Concord. It is my opinion based on my own experience that he doesn't deserve it, and I felt I needed to let the Council know and submit a public comment. Perhaps others will share similar experiences in the future.
Hope
-----Original Message-----
From: Benavente, Pablo <[email protected]> Sent: Jan 12, 2026 2:40 PM
To: Hope Johnson <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>, Barone, Valerie <[email protected]>, Ezell, Justin <[email protected]> Subject: Re: opposition to Item 4e re Council meeting 1/13/26 Hello Hope - Thank you for taking the time to write. Allegations involving racist language or harmful conduct are serious. They should not be ignored, and they should not be accepted without scrutiny.
To fully weigh what you shared, I would need more than a general recollection. If there is any documentation, others who witnessed it, or anything more concrete you are willing to share privately, that would help ensure we are not relying on misunderstandings. I need to be fair to the community and also fair to the individual being named.
I appreciate you raising the concern. Your message will be part of what I take into consideration as the council reviews this proposal, and I encourage you to reach back out if you have more specific information you feel comfortable providing.
With gratitude,
Pablo Benavente
Councilmember, City of Concord, District 4
From: Hope Johnson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 2:30 PM
To: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Cc: Nakamura, Laura <[email protected]>; Benavente, Pablo <[email protected]>; Hoffmeister, Laura <[email protected]>; Obringer, Carlyn <[email protected]>; Aliano, Dominic
<[email protected]>; Awad, Colleen <[email protected]> Subject: opposition to Item 4e re Council meeting 1/13/26
Dear City Clerk:
Please accept the following in opposition to Item 4e on agenda for the Concord City Council meeting on Jan. 13, 2026. Thank you.
Dear Concord City Council:
Concord's busy main US Post Office should not be named for Carl Jefferson, and approving Congressman DeSaulnier's HR 6849 bill to do so is a mistake.
Elevating Mr. Jefferson on a federal level is a disservice to the US Postal Service and City of Concord. While an employee at Concord Records, I was disappointed with his penchant for harmful stereotypes and narcissistic boasting, including hearing him use a derogatory term as a nickname for one employee whose Native American heritage was evident in his facial features. This attitude must finally be left in the past, not celebrated.
Politicians wishing to honor Carl Jefferson should limit that to direct associations with specific accomplishments they admire. However, glorifying him as an honorable figure in general, and saddling the US Post Office with that, is promoting emulation of behavior like that we currently see tearing our country apart at the federal level.
Thank you,
Hope Johnson
Concord resident
Staff Report
Date: January 13, 2026
To: City Council
From: Valerie J. Barone, City Manager
Reviewed by: Mindy Gentry, Director of Community Development Carlton Thompson, PE, City Engineer
Bruce Davis, PE, CIP Manager
Prepared by: Kevin Wheat, PE, Associate Civil Engineer
[email protected]
(925) 671-3422
Subject: Considering authorizing an increase to the contingency from 15% to 21% (an increase of $453,780) on the existing
construction contract with Bay Cities Paving & Grading Inc. for the Residential Pavement Maintenance Phase E Project
located on Port Chicago Highway and the St. Francis Park and Holbrook Heights neighborhoods (City Project Nos. 2613 & 2621) to cover additional paving and fiber optic work. (Funded by Measure V, Fund 407)
CEQA: Previously determined not to be a project/exempt per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(2), 15061(b)(3), 15378, 15301, 15302, 15303, 15304 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.
Report in Brief
The Residential Pavement Maintenance Phase E Project (Project Nos. 2613 & 2621) (Project) performed pavement maintenance in multiple residential areas and a portion of Port Chicago Highway, as well as the installation of curb ramps at intersections to meet accessibility standards, minor curb and gutter repairs, striping improvements, and installation of fiber optic conduit and signal equipment (on Port Chicago Highway only).
See the attached maps (Attachment 1) for paving locations.
4.f4.f
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.f
January 13, 2026
The increase in contingency is required to cover the cost of additional work that was performed as part of this Project. During construction, the pavement limits on Port Chicago Highway were extended further south to the intersection of Park Street/Clayton Road, instead of stopping at the north end of Concord Blvd intersection per the original plan in order to address the deteriorated pavement condition. Additionally, extra utility cover adjustments were added throughout the Project to improve ride quality in the residential areas. Fiber optic cable installation was included on Port Chicago Highway, connecting fiber optic lines through both new and existing conduit from East Olivera Road to the IT Server Room at Civic Center to complete the fiber master plan core infrastructure build. The fiber optic installation provides the backbone infrastructure for adaptive signal systems, real-time traffic monitoring via the Transportation Management Center, and improved corridor-level traffic management, supporting more efficient and responsive operations.
Work on the project was substantially completed in October 2025, and the Project will move forward with acceptance and filing of the Notice of Completion later this month after completing final payment for these additional items.
Recommended Action
Authorize an increase to the contingency from 15% to 21% (an increase of $453,780) on the existing construction contract with Bay Cities Paving & Grading Inc. for the Residential Pavement Maintenance Phase E Project (City Project Nos. 2613 & 2621) located on Port Chicago Highway and the St. Francis Park and Holbrook Heights neighborhoods to cover additional paving and fiber optic work.
Background
On March 25, 2025, Council approved award of a construction contract in the amount of $7,563,000 to Bay Cities Paving & Grading Inc. for the Residential Pavement Maintenance Phase E Project (City Project Nos. 2613 & 2621) and authorized staff to utilize the available project contingency for contract change orders that become necessary up to 15% of the contract amount.
Analysis
The following items of work were added to the Project to provide a better quality product, while also supporting the Measure V funding priorities and spending deadlines and the work is complete:
1) Additional paving: Paving limits were extended on Port Chicago Highway further south to Park Street/Clayton Road intersection, which significantly improved two blocks of Port Chicago Highway showing visible signs of moderate cracking and poor ride quality across all four lanes. In addition to the extended limits on Port Chicago Highway, extra “digouts” or pavement repairs were added to various streets prior to receiving a rubber cape seal (a two-layer treatment involving chip seal followed by slurry seal) surface treatment. Multiple intersections had the
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.f
January 13, 2026
pavement removed and replaced to improve ride quality and ensure longevity, including the Esperanza/Moretti Drive intersection to mitigate vehicles bottoming out when driving into the intersection.
2) To improve ride quality, a significant number of additional utility cover adjustments were performed throughout the project limits in areas where a rubber cape seal surface treatment was installed on existing pavement. More specifically, utility covers that measured more than ¼ inch below the final surface were adjusted to finished grade. Many of these extra adjustments were Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) water valves, and their costs for adjustment will be reimbursed by CCWD to the City at a later date. 3) Installation of empty fiber optic conduit was included in the Project’s base-bid and the actual installation of fiber optic cable was added to the Project. This work included the installation of strands of fiber optic cable in the newly installed conduit on Port Chicago Highway from East Olivera Road’s traffic signal cabinet to the Concord Boulevard intersection, as well as fiber optic cable being installed in the existing empty conduit on Salvio Street, providing a direct connection to the IT Server Room in Wing C at Civic Center. This new fiber will allow for improved traffic operations.
Financial Impact
The current total budget for the Residential Pavement Maintenance Phase E Project (Project Nos. 2613 & 2621) is $11,000,000, funded primarily by Measure V funds (Fund 407). There are sufficient funds in the project to cover the increase to 21% contingency for contract change orders, and no budget transfers are required.
Environmental Determination
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively “CEQA”), the City Council previously determined on March 25, 2025, as part of its review and approval that award of the contract, a budget transfer, and associated appropriation does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065, 14 Cal Code Regs. Sections 15060(c), 15273, 15378, as it has no potential for resulting in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and/or the activities consist of creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not constitute a “project”. Even if Council action on this item did constitute a project under CEQA, it falls within the “common sense” exemption set forth in 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” In the alternative, Council action on this item is exempt under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 – Existing Facilities, 15302 – Replacement and Reconstruction,
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.f
January 13, 2026
15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, and/or 15304 – Minor Alterations to Land, as it involves pavement maintenance of an existing roadway, installation of curb ramps to meet accessibility standards, minor curb and gutter repairs, striping improvements, and installation of fiber optic conduit and signal equipment. No unusual circumstances exist and none of the exceptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgement and analysis.
The increase in the construction contingency is subject to the same exemptions.
Accordingly, no further environmental review is required.
The Notice of Exemption was originally filed with the County Clerk’s office on April 4, 2025.
Public Contact
The City Council Agenda was posted.
Attachment
1. Project Location Maps
Attachment 1
RESIDENTIAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE PHASE E PROJECT (PJ 2613 & PJ 2621)
LOCATION MAPS
Project Location Map
Pavement Maintenance – Zone 4L - Project No. 2613
Project Location Map
Pavement Maintenance - Zones 5M & 5H, and Port Chicago Highway - Project No. 2621
Staff Report
Date: January 13, 2026
To: City Council
From: Valerie J. Barone, City Manager
Reviewed by: Mindy Gentry, Director of Community Development Carlton Thompson, PE, City Engineer
Bruce Davis, PE, CIP Manager
Prepared by: Tianjun Cao, PE, Associate Civil Engineer
[email protected]
(925) 671-3243
Subject: Considering the following actions for the Citywide Accessibility Improvements No. 12 (Project No. 2728), which will upgrade curb ramps at five locations throughout the City:
1. Award of a Construction Contract in the amount of $400,988 to Rosas Brothers Construction and authorizing staff to utilize the available project contingency for contract change orders up to 10% of the contract amount; authorizing the Mayor to execute the contract in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; and making the NEPA and CEQA determination as provided in this staff report (Funded by Community Development Block Grant Funds and Measure J Local Funds);
2. Approving related budget transfers in the total amount of $210,000 from Street Maintenance Project No. 1 (Project No. 2736); and
3. Authorizing the City Engineer to accept the improvements upon completion of Project No. 2728 and directing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
NEPA: Categorical exclusion per Section 24 CFR 58.25 (a)(2).
CEQA: Not a project/exempt per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060 (c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15302, 15304, and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.
4.g4.g4.g4.g
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.g
January 13, 2026
Report in Brief
The Citywide Accessibility Improvements No. 12 project (Project No. 2728) will provide accessibility improvements at five locations around the City. The locations included in the project are Bonifacio Street at N 6th Street, Mendocino Drive at Orangewood Drive, Washington Boulevard at Kelrose Court, select streets in the Ayers neighborhood such as Laurel Drive and Saddlewood Drive, and several streets in the Dana Estates Neighborhood (See Attachment 1). Project improvements include American with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps, striping, and minimal paving work. There are twenty-seven (27) curb ramps within the Base Bid and eighteen (18) curb ramps within the Additive Bids. Due to budget constraints, staff is recommending award of the Base Bid work, with the locations for the Additive Bids to be completed at a later time.
All curb ramps within the Additive Bid are within the Dana Estates neighborhood.
The project has been designed and competitively bid; and is at the point of construction contract award. If award is approved by the City Council, project construction is expected to begin in February 2026 and be completed in April 2026, weather permitting.
Recommended Action
1. Award the construction contract in the amount of $400,988 to Rosas Brothers Construction for the Citywide Accessibility Improvements No. 12 (Project No. 2728); authorize staff to utilize the available project contingency for contract change orders up to 10% of the contract amount, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; and make the NEPA and CEQA determinations as provided in this staff report (Funded by Community Development Block Grants, Measure J Local Funds);
2. Approve related budget transfers to Citywide Accessibility Improvements No. 12 (Project No. 2728) in the total amount of $210,000 from Street Maintenance Project No. 1 (Project No. 2736); and
3. Authorize the City Engineer to accept the improvements, upon completion of Project No. 2728, and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
Background
Each year, the City Council approves an allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to fund both the design and the construction of ADA accessibility improvement projects. The ADA accessibility improvement projects include construction of sidewalk and curb ramps to improve accessibility in various locations throughout the City. Additionally, the Council approves an allocation of local funds to supplement the appropriated CDBG funds. The local funds are used to fund the administrative project-related costs of this project, since CDBG funds may not be used for that purpose.
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.g
January 13, 2026
The Citywide Accessibility Improvements No. 12 (Project No. 2728) was approved by the City Council in June 2024 as part of the Capital Budget. The specific scope of work for Project No. 2728 includes the construction of forty-five (45) ADA compliant curb ramps. This project is part of the effort to upgrade all non-ADA compliant curb ramps citywide, especially those in high use pedestrian areas and school zone areas. The project as bid includes a Base Bid of twenty-seven (27) ramp locations, Additive Bid #1 of eighteen (18) ramp locations, and Additive Bid #2 for additional concrete work. Staff recommends the award of the Base Bid and not awarding the two Additive Bids. The Base Bid includes the following locations: Bonifacio Street at N 6th Street, Mendocino Drive at Orangewood Drive, Washington Boulevard at Kelrose Court, select streets in the Ayers neighborhood such as Laurel Drive and Saddlewood Drive, and Mulberry Drive in the Dana Estates neighborhood. Additive Bid #1 included additional streets in the Dana Estates neighborhood such as Sharon Drive and Lynwood Drive, those intersections will now be in consideration for future accessibility improvements projects.
Additive Bid #2 is for additional valley gutter work at one intersection that was not associated with accessibility.
Procurement Process
The project was advertised for construction bids as required by state law and City policy. The Engineer’s Estimate for the Total Bid is $729,000. Bids were opened on November 20, 2025. Twelve (12) bids were received in the amount ranging from $594,549.50 to $968,600. The basis of award for this project is the Total Bid. The lowest bid was received from Rosas Brothers Construction of Oakland, CA (Rosas). A summary of the three lowest responsive bids is as follows:
BID
SCHEDULE
Engineer's
Estimate
Rosas
Brothers
Construction
FBD Vanguard
Villalobos &
Associates
Base Bid $495,443 $400,988 $445,146 $425,968.50
Additive
Bid #1
$226,145 $181,381.50 $198,745 $222,876
Additive
Bid #2
$7,412 $12,180 $8,729 $7,511
Total Bid $729,000 $594,549.50 $652,620 $656,355.50
Rosas was the low bidder and submitted a responsive and responsible bid. Rosas has an appropriate and valid contractor’s license and satisfactory work references.
Staff completed analysis of Rosas’s bid, determining that this firm along with its subcontractors possess appropriate and valid licenses, and are not on any debarred lists. Rosas is registered with the Department of Industrial Relations as required by SB
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.g
January 13, 2026
854. Due to budget constraints, staff is recommending award of the Base Bid. Should Council award this contract, twenty-seven (27) curb ramps will be constructed.
Locations that were included in Additive Bid #1 will be in consideration for future accessibility improvements projects, unit prices received were not adequately favorable to consider award of this work. Additive Bid #2 is not recommended for award due to unfavorable pricing received for concrete work that does not have a direct association with improving accessibility.
Financial Impact
The current total budget for this project is $360,000 and is funded by $60,000 in Measure J Local Funds (Fund 475) and $300,000 in CDBG funds (Fund 254). There are insufficient funds to award the construction contract, including a 10% construction contingency, as well as the costs for construction management, inspection and testing services, and staff oversight.
A budget transfer in the amount of $210,000 is needed to fully fund the project for construction of the Base Bid work, a 10% construction contingency, construction management, inspection, and City staff time. The budget transfer would come from Street Maintenance Project No. 1 (Project No.2736) from Measure V funds, $186,000 from Fund 490 and $24,000 from Fund 407. Project No. 2736 is currently in project closeout and the remaining fund balances are no longer needed for the project. The revised project budget after this budget transfer will be $570,000.
Environmental Determination
The project is Categorically Excluded from preparation of an environmental review in accordance with Section 24 CFR 58.25 (a)(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060 (c), 15061 (b)(3), 15378, and Public Resources Code Section 21065, award of this contract is not subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, as it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and because it involves government funding/fiscal activities.
In the alternative, award of this contract is statutorily exempt under CEQA Guideline Section 15273 and is categorically exempt pursuant to Sections 15301 – Existing Facilities, 15302 – Replacement and Reconstruction, and 15304 – Minor Alterations to Land, as it involves constructing curb ramps where there is existing sidewalk, striping, and minimal paving work. No unusual circumstances exist and none of the exceptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgement and analysis. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Change and the County Clerk’s office following the Council award of the construction contract.
Public Contact
The City Council Agenda was posted.
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.g
January 13, 2026
Attachments
1. Location Maps
2. Bid Summary
3. Construction Contract
Attachment 1
Location Maps
Citywide Accessibility Improvements No. 12 (Project 2728) - Ramp upgrade locations (Base Bid)
- Ramp upgrade locations (Additive Bid)
Attachment 1
Attachment 1
Attachment 1
PROJECT #2728
City of Concord
Bid Sheet
Citywide Accessibility Improvements No. 12
Garden Room
Engineer's Estimate:
COMPANY
Rosas Brothers Construction
P.O. Box 7862
Oakland, CA 9460 l
Ii> IR: l 00000400 I
Rapid Grading Services
23842 Cabot Blvd
Ifayward, CA 94545
DIR: 101011090
PBD Vanguard Construction. Inc
550 Greenville Rd
Livermore, CA 94550
DIR: l 000008493
Villalobos + Associates, Inc.
7810 Monterey St.
qilroy, CA 95020
DIR: I 000429889
Fhontline General Engineering Construction Inc
4 48 W. Pine Haven Dr.
Tracy, CA 95305
Dir: l 000634065
Sposeto Engineering Inc.
4558 Contractors Pl.
Livermore, CA 94551
D�R: l 000005234
Mondemscapes Innovations
163 Meadowbrook Ct
Oakley, CA 94561
DlR:2000005990
Terocons Inc.
l 60 Battery St. Ste I 00
San Franciso, CA 94111
DIR: 1000978603
I
Contact: Tianjun ext. 3243
Bid Opening:
Thursday,
November 20, 2025
2:00 p.m.
To be awarded:
TOTAL BID
$594,549.50
$626,187.00
$652,620.00
$656,355.50
$701,061.15
$745,011.00
$747,881.00
$782,500.00
Non-Responsive
$691,728.97
Attachment 2
ConapaNv Torel Blo
Kerex Engineering
P.O. Box 23831
Pleasant Hill, CA
DIR:1000033698
$787,499.00
ZaraConstruction
2343 Donner Pass Ave
Sacramento, CA 95835
DIR:1000854264
$8 I 1,788.00
JPB Designs Inc
5650 Main Ave Ste 2
Orangevale, CA95662
DIR:1000013802
$921,699.00
S&H Construction, Inc
5560 Boscell Common
Fremont, CA 94538
DIR: 1000000362
s968.600.00
Contact: Tianjun Cao x3243
Contact: Tianjun ext. 3243
CONTRACT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
This public works contract (“Contract”) is entered into by and between the City of Concord (“City”) and Arias Concrete Contractor Inc. (“Contractor”), for work on the Citywide Accessibility Improvements No. 12 (City Project No. 2728) (“Project”).
The parties agree as follows:
1. Award of Contract. In response to the Notice Inviting Bids, Contractor has submitted a bid to perform the Work to construct the Project. On January 13, 2026, City authorized award of this Contract to Contractor for the amount set forth in Section 4, below.
2. Contract Documents. The Contract Documents incorporated into this Contract include and are comprised of all of the documents listed below. The definitions provided in Article 1 of the General Conditions apply to all of the Contract Documents, including this Contract.
2.1 Notice Inviting Bids;
2.2 Instructions to Bidders;
2.3 Addenda, if any;
2.4 Bid Form and attachments thereto;
2.5 Contract;
2.6 Payment and Performance Bonds;
2.7 General Conditions;
2.8 Special Conditions;
2.9 Project Plans and Specifications;
2.10 Change Orders, if any;
2.11 Notice of Potential Award;
2.12 Notice to Proceed
3. Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor will perform all of the Work required for the Project, as specified in the Contract Documents. Contractor must provide, furnish, and supply all things necessary and incidental for the timely performance and completion of the Work, including all necessary labor, materials, supplies, tools, equipment, transportation, onsite facilities, and utilities, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. Contractor must use its best efforts to diligently prosecute and complete the Work in a professional and expeditious manner and to meet or exceed the performance Attachment 3
2 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 standards required by the Contract Documents.
4. Payment. As full and complete compensation for Contractor’s timely performance and completion of the Work in strict accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents, City will pay Contractor $400,988 (“Contract Price”) for all of Contractor’s direct and indirect costs to perform the Work, including all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, taxes, insurance, bonds and all overhead costs, in accordance with the payment provisions in the General Conditions.
5. Time for Completion. The Project must be fully completed within 25 working days (weekends and holidays are excluded) from the start date set forth in the Notice to Proceed. City anticipates that the Work will begin in February 2026 but the anticipated start date is provided solely for convenience and is neither certain nor binding.
The Contractor will fully complete the Work for the Project, meeting all requirements for completion of all bid items within 25 working days from the commencement date given in the Notice to Proceed (“Contract Time”). By signing below, Contractor expressly waives any claim for delayed early completion.
6. Liquidated Damages. As further specified in Section 5.4 of the General Conditions and below, if Contractor fails to complete the Work within the Contract Time, City will assess liquidated damages in the amounts described below, and such liquidated damages may be deducted from City’s payments due or to become due to Contractor under this Contract. 1) Contractor shall pay to the City of Concord $2,272 per day for each and every calendar day(s) delay in completing the work in excess of the number of working days specified.
2) The Contractor shall pay to the City of Concord $431 per hour for each hour that the Contractor performs work outside the hours of work without prior approval in writing from the City.
7. Labor Code Compliance.
7.1 General. This Contract is subject to all applicable requirements of Chapter 1 of Part 7 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, including requirements pertaining to wages, working hours and workers’ compensation insurance, as further specified in Article 9 of the General Conditions.
3 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 7.2 Prevailing Wages. This Project is subject to the prevailing wage requirements applicable to the locality in which the Work is to be performed for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to perform the Work, including employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, apprenticeship and similar purposes. Copies of these prevailing rates are available online at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR.
7.3 DIR Registration. City may not enter into the Contract with a bidder without proof that the bidder and its Subcontractors are registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code § 1725.5, subject to limited legal exceptions.
8. Workers’ Compensation Certification. Pursuant to Labor Code § 1861, by signing this Contract, Contractor certifies as follows: “I am aware of the provisions of Labor Code § 3700 which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work on this Contract.”
9. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor, its employees, Subcontractors and agents, may not have, maintain or acquire a conflict of interest in relation to this Contract in violation of any City ordinance or requirement, or in violation of any California law, including Government Code § 1090 et seq., or the Political Reform Act, as set forth in Government Code § 81000 et seq. and its accompanying regulations.
Any violation of this Section constitutes a material breach of the Contract.
10. Independent Contractor. Contractor is an independent contractor under this Contract and will have control of the Work and the means and methods by which it is performed. Contractor and its Subcontractors are not employees of City and are not entitled to participate in any health, retirement, or any other employee benefits from City.
11. Notice. Any notice, billing, or payment required by or pursuant to the Contract Documents must be made in writing, signed, dated and sent to the other party by personal delivery, U.S. Mail, a reliable overnight delivery service, or by email as a PDF file. Notice is deemed effective upon delivery, except that service by U.S. Mail is deemed effective on the second working day after deposit for delivery.
Notice for each party must be given as follows:
4 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 City:
Citywide Accessibility Improvements No. 12
1950 Parkside Drive M/S 40
Concord, CA 94519
Attn: Tianjun Cao, Associate Civil Engineer
[email protected]
Contractor:
Name: Rosas Brothers Construction
Address: 4731 Coliseum Way
City/State/Zip: Oakland, CA 94601
Phone: (510) 377-7369
Attn: Victor Rosas
Email: [email protected]
12. General Provisions.
12.1 Assignment and Successors. Contractor may not assign its rights or obligations under this Contract, in part or in whole, without City’s written consent. This Contract is binding on Contractor’s and City’s lawful heirs, successors and permitted assigns.
12.2 Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries to this Contract.
12.3 Governing Law and Venue. This Contract will be governed by California law and venue will be in the Contra Costa County Superior Court, and no other place. Contractor waives any right it may have pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 394, to file a motion to transfer any action arising from or relating to this Contract to a venue outside of Contra Costa County, California.
12.4 Amendment. No amendment or modification of this Contract will be binding unless it is in a writing duly authorized and signed by the parties to this Contract.
12.5 Integration. This Contract and the Contract Documents incorporated herein, including authorized amendments or Change Orders thereto, constitute the final, complete, and exclusive terms
5 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 of the agreement between City and Contractor.
12.6 Severability. If any provision of the Contract Documents is determined to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining provisions of the Contract Documents will remain in full force and effect.
12.7 Iran Contracting Act. If the Contract Price exceeds $1,000,000, Contractor certifies, by signing below, that it is not identified on a list created under the Iran Contracting Act, Public Contract Code § 2200 et seq. (the “Act”), as a person engaging in investment activities in Iran, as defined in the Act, or is otherwise expressly exempt under the Act.
12.8 Authorization. Each individual signing below warrants that he or she is authorized to do so by the party that he or she represents, and that this Contract is legally binding on that party. If Contractor is a corporation, signatures from two officers of the corporation are required pursuant to California Corporation Code § 313.
The parties agree to this Contract as witnessed by the signatures below:
CITY: Approved as to form:
_______________________________ __________________________________ Mayor Susanne Brown, City Attorney
Date: ___________________________ Date: ______________________________ Attest:
_______________________________
Joelle Fockler, City Clerk
Date: ___________________________
6 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 CONTRACTOR: Rosas Brothers Construction
_______________________________
Victor Rosas, President
Date: ____________________________
Second Signature (See Section 12.8):
_______________________________
_________________________________
Name, Title
Date: ____________________________
848835, 10/31/2026 .
Contractor’s California License Number(s) and Expiration Date(s) FINANCE DIRECTOR'S CERTIFICATION:
Concord, California
Date:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ADEQUATE FUNDS EXIST OR WILL BE RECEIVED DURING THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 25/26 TO PAY THE ANTICIPATED EXPENSES TO BE INCURRED PURSUANT TO THIS CONTRACT.
THE SUM OF $400,988. Account Code 2549500C999-74200 / 2542728215-74200 ($256,748), 4909500C999-74200 / 4902728115-74200 ($144,240)
Finance Director's Signature
Staff Report
Date: January 13, 2026
To: City Council
From: Valerie J. Barone, City Manager
Reviewed by: Mindy Gentry, Director of Community Development Aaron Sage, Planning Manager
Prepared by: Frank Abejo, Principal Planner
[email protected]
(925) 671-3128
Subject: Considering a recommendation by the City Council Committee on Housing and Economic Development to defer the
implementation of Housing Element Objective 16.1 facilitating tiny homes and cottage developments on religious institution sites.
CEQA: Exempt/not a project pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Sections
15060(c)(2), 15061(b)(3), and/or 15378.
Report in Brief
The City Council (“Council”) is requested to consider a recommendation by the Council Committee on Housing and Economic Development (“HED Committee” or “Committee”) (Hoffmeister/Obringer) on the implementation of Housing Element Objective 16.1, to facilitate tiny homes and cottage developments on religious institution sites. For the reasons discussed in this report, which include a change in state law that occurred after adoption of the objective, the HED Committee recommends deferring implementation of this objective until such time the City receives more interest in developing housing on religious institution-owned properties.
Recommended Action
Defer implementation of Housing Element Objective 16.1 facilitating tiny homes and cottage developments until such time the City receives more interest in developing housing on religious institution-owned properties.
4.h4.h
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.h
January 13, 2026
Background
Housing Element Objective 16.1 and Senate Bill 4
The City’s 2023-2031 Housing Element (“Housing Element”) contains Program 16, which includes the following objective to facilitate housing on religious institution sites:
Objective 16.1: Amend the Development Code by December 2024 as required by State law (AB 1851) to identify a process by which parking requirements can be reduced for religious institutions in exchange for housing development and develop regulations to facilitate tiny homes/cottage production or other housing opportunities on religious institution sites.
After the City adopted the Housing Element, Governor Newsom signed into law the Affordable Housing on Faith Lands Act (a.k.a. “Senate Bill 4” or “SB 4”), which became effective on January 1, 2024. This bill requires local jurisdictions to allow housing development projects, including those with tiny homes and/or cottages, by right on land owned by religious institutions or independent institutions of higher education.
HED Committee Meetings
On May 5, 2025, staff presented the HED Committee with the following options to implement Objective 16.1:
1. Follow SB 4 only, and do not develop additional standards or regulations for tiny home/cottage development on religious institution sites.
2. Develop more robust objective design standards for tiny home/cottage development on religious institution sites processed under SB 4.
3. Create standards and regulations for tiny home/cottage developments that do not fall under the specific requirements of SB 4 that would apply to all religious institution-owned properties.
4. Create standards and regulations for tiny home/cottage developments that do not fall under the specific requirements of SB 4 that would apply to select religious institution sites.
5. Consider projects on a case-by-case basis under the City’s current regulations and process with feedback sought from City Council in a study session.
The Committee indicated support for creating objective design standards (ODS) to address tiny homes/cottage developments in addition to all residential developments permitted under SB 4. The Committee requested staff return with additional information for further consideration, including a map of the 64 properties owned by religious institutions that would be eligible under Objective 16.1 and SB 4 (Attachment 1).
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.h
January 13, 2026
On November 3, 2025, staff returned to the Committee with the requested information.
Staff also discussed the impact on other Housing Element implementation efforts and policy work (e.g., ODS for small lot developments, Economic Development Strategic Plan, etc.) by directing staff to create ODS for tiny home/cottage developments and SB 4 projects.
Staff further noted that the City has not received any interest in developing tiny homes/cottage development on religious institution sites or SB 4 projects. Due to the lack of interest and the new development rights created by SB 4 there is no urgency to develop standards for these projects compared to standards for small-lot developments.
Additionally, as a result of SB 450 rendering the City’s ODS on SB 9 projects as unenforceable, the Council recently directed the Ad Hoc Committee on Small Lot Developments to study the possibility of developing ODS for single-family homes that could be applied to SB 9 projects. The Committee also considered the potential impact of creating ODS for single-family homes in addition to tiny homes/cottage developments/SB 4 projects on the overall ODS update effort.
After considering the above information, the Committee directed staff to defer implementing Objective 16.1 due to impacts on other Housing Element implementation efforts and policy work. SB 4 housing developments on religious institution-owned properties will be subject to the City’s current objective standards to the extent permitted under the state law. If a non-SB 4 project is proposed on religious institution-owned property, staff will bring the project to a Council study session for direction on developing regulations as part of the proposed project.
State Reporting
The City’s actions related to Objective 16.1 will be documented in the Annual Progress Report submitted by April 1 of each year to the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
Staff does not believe HCD will consider deferral of Objective 16.1 to warrant enforcement action because this Housing Element objective was included prior to SB 4 being signed into law and this objective would not create additional housing beyond what is already allowed under SB 4.
Financial Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
Environmental Determination
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., as amended and implementing the State CEQA Guidelines Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed action to defer implementation of Housing Element Objective 16.1 does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065 and 14 Cal Code Regs Section
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.h
January 13, 2026
15060(c)(2) or 15378, because the action does not have the potential to result in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Even if the deferment of implementation of Housing Element Objective 16.1 did constitute a project under CEQA, the amendment falls within the “common sense” exemption set forth in 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment….” Accordingly, no further environmental review is required. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.
Public Contact
The City Council Agenda was posted.
Attachment
1. Religious Sites Table and Map
1 ID No. Location Zoning (GP) Acreage Property Owner APN 1 2832 CLAYTON RD CMX 0.25 ISLAMIC CENTER OF CONTRA COSTA 105013021 2 1467 BABEL LN RM 0.8 BETHEL BAPTIST CHURCH CONCORD 105091020 3 1475 BABEL LN RM 0.46 BETHEL BAPTIST CHURCH CONCORD 105091021 4 3578 CLAYTON RD RM 1.8 BETHEL BAPTIST CHURCH CONCORD 105091026 5 2425 OLIVERA RD RM 1.2 ST MICHAELS ORTHODOX CHURCH 110035009 6 REITZ DR PD (MDR) 0.24 THE FATHERS HOUSE 110100025
7 2140 OLIVERA CT PD (MDR) 2.23 THE FATHERS HOUSE 110100027 8 3142 GRANT ST PD (MDR) 0.73 NEW HOPE CHURCH OF CONCORD 110100028 9 2120 OLIVERA CT PD (MDR) 1.9 NEW HOPE CHURCH OF CONCORD 110100030 10 OLIVERA CT PD (MDR) 0.36 THE FATHERS HOUSE 110100033 11 3601 PORT CHICAGO HWY RS-7.5 0.51 NO CONGR OF JEHOVAHS WITNESSES 110410113 12 OLIVERA CT PD (MDR) 0.87 NEW HOPE CHURCH OF CONCORD 110540007 13 3033 BONIFACIO ST RS-6 7.23 PRIMERA IGLESIA BAUTISTA 111180023 14 2925 BONIFACIO ST RS-6 1.93 ST MICHAEL & ALL ANGELS PARISH 111181010 15 3039 WILLOW PASS RD PQP 2.32 FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH 111240012 16 2301 MOUNT DIABLO ST NTS 0.29 ROMAN CATHOLIC WELFARE CORP 112124003 17 2390 GRANT ST NTS N/A ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OAKLAND 112142028 18 2390 GRANT ST NTS 0.77 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OAKLAND 112142031 19 1803 2ND ST CMX 0.9 SAIVA SIDDHANTHA ASHRAM 113011035 20 3425 CONCORD BLVD RS-7.5 1.8 CALVARY APOSTOLIC CHURCH 113091035 21 3525 CHESTNUT AVE RS-10 2 TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH 113202009 22 2875 THE ALAMEDA DMX 0.44 FREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH 113263006 23 4000 CONCORD BLVD RS-8 5.4 FIRST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CH 114120010 24 1645 WEST ST RS-7 4.9 CONCORD UNITED METHODIST CHRCH 114250044 25 NO ADDRESS RS-10 0.4 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OAKLAND 114260039 26 3866 CHESTNUT AVE RS-10 9 ROMAN CATHOLIC WELFARE CORP 114260043 27 3979 CHESTNUT AVE RS-8 1.3 INTL CH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL 114300057 28 3700 CONCORD BLVD RS-8 3.5 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LDS 114370009 29 1865 CLAYTON WAY RS-6 0.85 UNIVERSAL CHURCH INC 114432071 30 1655 WEST ST RS-7 3.5 SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS NCCA 114542038 31 4255 CLAYTON RD PQP 9.4 CONCORD CHRISTIAN CENTER 115080042 32 4380 CONCORD BLVD PQP 4.1 TABERNACLE BAPTIST CHURCH 115482012 33 1590 DENKINGER RD PD (LDR) 4.7 CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS 115535001 34 1955 KIRKER PASS RD RR20 4.1 ST DEMETRIOUS GRK ORTHODOX CH 117070018 35 CONCORD BLVD RS-10 5 CROSSROADS COVENANT CHURCH 117120086 36 5294 CONCORD BLVD RS-10 1.3 ST MARTIN OF TOURS PARISH 117140103 37 5430 MICHIGAN BLVD PD (LDR) 1.9 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 120094025 38 5562 CLAYTON RD PD (LDR) 3.9 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OAKLAND 120150014 39 5562 CLAYTON RD PD (LDR) 5 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OAKLAND 120150015 40 YGNACIO VALLEY RD PD (LDR) 1 HOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH 120210007 41 1092 ALBERTA WAY PD (LDR) 2.9 HOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH 120210032 Attachment 3 - Religious Use Sites Table.xls
Attachment 1
2 42 1360 ALBERTA WAY PD (LDR) 2.9 CHURCH OF CHRIST OF LDS 120351012 43 1970 GRANT ST DP 0.2 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 126073011 44 1965 COLFAX ST DP 0.8 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 126073014 45 SALVIO ST DP 0.1 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 126074001 46 SALVIO ST DP 0.1 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 126074002 47 1630 GRANT ST DMX 0.3 GRACE CHINESE ALLIANCE CHURCH 126103019 48 1187 MEADOW LN RM 1.8 PARKHAVEN BAPTIST CHURCH 128120078 49 860 OAK GROVE RD RS-7.5 0.9 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OAKLAND 129121003 50 850 OAK GROVE RD RM 0.6 ROMAN CATHOLIC WELFARE CORP 129121004 51 866 OAK GROVE RD RS-7.5 5.8 ROMAN CATHOLIC WELFARE CORP 129121005 52 988 OAK GROVE RD RS-7 2.5 ST MARY & ST MINA COPTIC 129210015 53 3165 TREAT BLVD RS-8 1.8 JAP-AMER RELIG & CULTURAL CEN 129271023 54 4260 THOMPSON DR RS-10 0.3 FAITH MISSIONARY BAPTIST CH 130200031 55 4266 THOMPSON DR RS-10 2.2 FAITH MISSIONARY BAPTIST CH 130200032 56 1411 LA VISTA AVE RS-8 1.3 VALLEY CHRISTIAN CHURCH 132030002 57 LA VISTA AVE RM 0.25 SALVATION ARMY THE 132100008
58 3950 CLAYTON RD RM 3 SALVATION ARMY THE 132100009
59 LA VISTA AVE RM 0.25 SALVATION ARMY THE 132100019
60 1480 LA VISTA AVE RM 0.3 SALVATION ARMY THE 132100023 61 4000 CLAYTON RD RS-8 4.4 GOOD SHEPHERD EVAN LUTH CHURCH 132100032 62 2140 MINERT RD RS-8 2.7 PRESBYTERY OF SAN FRANCISCO 145064015 63 2930 TREAT BLVD NC 3.5 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LDS 145230001 64 1925 RISDON RD RS-8 7.1 FAIR OAKS BAPTIST CHURCH 147341053 Attachment 3 - Religious Use Sites Table.xls
?×
?×
%&p(
%&p(
A¿
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
1314
15 16
17 18
19 20
2122
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
Diamond
Blvd
Galindo St
Olivera Rd
Meadow Ln
Concord Av
Market St
Ygnacio Valley Rd
Solano W
y
Clayton Rd
Monument Blvd
CrystylRanch Rd
Kirker Pass Rd
Arnold Industrial Wy
Treat Blv
d
Port Chica
go H
wy
Concord Blvd
Oak
Grove R
d
Bailey Rd
Cowell Rd
Will
ow Pa
ss Rd
Religious Use Parcels I
0 2,500 5,0001,250
Feet
S:\MapRequest\CED\Planning\ReligiousUseProperties\ReligiousUseProperties.aprx Map Created: 9/25/2025 By GIS Division of Information Technology
Legend
# APN # APN
1 105013021
2 105091020
3 105091021
4 105091026
5 110035009
6 110100025
7 110100027
8 110100028
9 110100030
10 110100033
11 110410113
12 110540007
13 111180023
14 111181010
15 111240012
16 112124003
17 112142028
18 112142031
19 113011035
20 113091035
21 113202009
22 113263006
23 114120010
24 114250044
25 114260039
26 114260043
27 114300057
28 114370009
29 114432071
30 114542038
31 115080042
32 115482012
33 115535001
34 117070018
35 117120086
36 117140103
37 120094025
38 120150014
39 120150015
40 120210007
41 120210032
42 120351012
43 126073011
44 126073014
45 126074001
46 126074002
47 126103019
48 128120078
49 129121003
50 129121004
51 129121005
52 129210015
53 129271023
54 130200031
55 130200032
56 132030002
57 132100008
58 132100009
59 132100019
60 132100023
61 132100032
62 145064015
63 145230001
64 147341053
Use Code 71
Staff Report
Date: January 13, 2026
To: City Council
From: Valerie J. Barone, City Manager
Reviewed by: Mindy Gentry, Director of Community Development Carlton Thompson, PE, City Engineer
Prepared by: Bernard, Enrile, PE, Senior Civil Engineer [email protected]
(925) 671-3031
Subject: Considering adoption of a Resolution accepting the Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and making findings in compliance with AB 1600. (Government Code Section 66000 et. seq)
CEQA: Not a project/exempt pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065, CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2), 15061(b)(3), 15262, 15273, and/or 15378.
Report in Brief
The Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000 et. seq.) requires each local agency to make public a report on developer fees within 180 days after the end of each fiscal year. Beginning on January 1, 2026, Assembly Bill 2663 (2024, Grayson) (Government Code Section 65906.6 ) requires jurisdictions that collect inclusionary housing in-lieu fees to post on its website the amount of fees and how they fees were spent. The City of Concord (City) completed its year-end audit and posted the required AB1600 report to the City’s website (www.cityofconcord.org/ab1600) on Friday, December 26, 2025, and incorporated the new AB 2663 inclusionary housing in-lieu fee reporting requirements. Section 66006(b)(2) requires each local agency to review the report at a regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after the information is made available to the public. The City collects several fees that fall under the purview of the Mitigation Fee Act.
4.i4.i4.i
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.i
January 13, 2026
At least every five years, the City Council must also (1) identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put, (2) demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged, (3) identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements identified when the fee was established or increased, and (4) designate the approximate dates when the anticipated funding will be secured to complete the identified improvements. This staff report and attached Resolution satisfy the reporting and findings required for developer fees.
Recommended Action
Adopt a Resolution (Attachment 1) accepting Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2024 – 2025 and make the findings in compliance with AB 1600.
Background
AB 1600 (Statutes of 1998, Mitigation Fee Act), codified as Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. governs how public agencies collect, maintain, and spend impact fees imposed on developers for the purpose of defraying costs of public facilities. AB 1600 sets forth requirements that local agencies must follow if they exact fees from developers to defray the cost of constructing public facilities related to development projects, and mandates reporting requirements for these fees. The annual required report consists of a brief description of the fee type in the account or fund, the amount of the fee, the beginning and ending balance of the account or fund, the amount of fees collected, and the interest earned. At least every five years, the City must (1) identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put, (2) demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged, (3) identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements identified when the fee was established or increased, and (4) designate the approximate dates when the anticipated funding will be secured to complete the identified improvements.
Additionally, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65906.6, which became effective on January 1, 2026, the City is required to annually post on its website both of the following:
(1) the amount of inclusionary housing in-lieu fees collected in the previous year, and
(2) whether the inclusionary housing in-lieu fees are intended to be used for a project, if any.
Every five years, the City is also required to post on its website both of the following:
(1) The amount of inclusionary housing in-lieu fees collected in the past five years, and
(2) The projects that the inclusionary housing in-lieu fees were spent on.
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.i
January 13, 2026
Through the General Plan and various fee studies, the City has established the nexus between development, the capital improvements necessary to mitigate the effects of development, and approved fees to fund the mitigation measures.
Analysis
State law requires that any local agency imposing development impact fees must prepare an annual report providing specific information about those fees as defined in California government Code Sections 65906.6, 66006(b) and 66001(d). The Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Impact Fee Report, included as Exhibit A to Attachment 1, meets all the requirements of these Government Code Sections. Specifics about the information required to be included in the report can be found on page 2 of that report.
Financial Impact
Adoption of the Resolution (Attachment 1) will allow the City to continue programming Traffic Mitigation Fees, Drainage Acreage, and Art in Public Places funds that are more than five years old.
Environmental Determination
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively “CEQA”), accepting the Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065, 14 Cal Code Regs. Section 15060(c)(2), and 15378 because it has no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Even if accepting the Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 did constitute a project under CEQA, this action is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies), 15273 (Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges) and this activity falls within the "common sense" CEQA exemption as set forth in 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” Therefore, the proposed acceptance of the Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 does not warrant further environmental review. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis. Individual projects will undergo CEQA analysis as necessary.
Public Contact
The Council Agenda was posted and the AB 1600 Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 was posted to the City’s website (www.cityofconcord.org/ab1600) on December 26, 2025 more than 15 days prior to being considered by the City Council. In addition, the Building Industry Association and the Concord Chamber of Commerce were notified about the January 13, 2026, meeting and informed them on the location of the report on the City’s website.
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.i
January 13, 2026
Attachment
1. Resolution
Exhibit A: AB1600 Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025
Res. No. 26-XX 1
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A Resolution Finding that there Remains a
Reasonable Relationship between Current Needs for
the Housing Inclusionary In-Lieu Fee, Parking In-lieu
Fee, Offsite Street Improvement Program (OSIP),
Art in Public Places, and Master Storm Drain Fees,
and the Purposes for which they were Originally
Charged (Government Code Section 66000 et seq.)
Resolution No. 26-XX
/
WHEREAS, the City’s Transportation Element of the adopted General Plan identifies improvements necessitated by continued development in the City and an Offsite Street Improvement Program to pay for development impacts has been authorized by Sections 19.25 et seq. of the Concord Municipal Code and is implemented through Policy & Procedure No. 144; and WHEREAS, the City has developed a Drainage Area Master Plan as part of the City’s adopted General Plan Drainage Element and subdivided that area into sub-areas and thereby established specific areas of common benefit to landowners within these subdivided areas as authorized by Section 13.15 et seq. of the Concord Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, in 1996, the City Council rescinded the Arts in Public Places fees and subsequently directed staff to conduct a study to identify options for using the funds; and WHEREAS, the City has established discrete accounts and fees to finance the construction of street, drainage improvements, and park improvements as mitigation measures for continued development within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City biennially adopts a comprehensive Capital Improvement Program to prioritize identified street, drainage improvements and park improvements and allocates funds to construct the improvements as mitigation for the continued development in the City; and WHEREAS, these improvements are scheduled to be constructed over time as sufficient funds become available; and
WHEREAS, to facilitate the development and availability of housing a broad range of households and implement the Housing Element of the Concord General Plan the City has identified Attachment 1
Res. No. 26-XX 2
the First-Time Home Buyer program as an appropriate use of the Inclusionary Housing Fees, WHEREAS, these identified improvements are of such size that sufficient funds have not been collected or obtained in order to construct these improvements by expending fees collected within the five-year expenditure period by Government Code Section 66001(d); and WHEREAS, there continues to be a distinct nexus between continued development and the necessity to mitigate development impacts on traffic circulation and drainage; and WHEREAS, fees collected previously and in the future as Offsite Street Improvement Fee and Drainage Acreage Fees are necessary to fund identified street and drainage improvements; and WHEREAS, fees collected previously for the Arts in Public Places fees are necessary to fund Arts and Cultural Projects; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared a report that contains information required by Government Code Sections 66001 and 66006, a copy which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Development Impact Fees Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025”); and
WHEREAS, the Development Impacts Fees Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 was made available for public viewing on December 26, 2025, which was at least 15 days prior to City Council action.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
Section 2. Council action on this item is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively “CEQA”), accepting the Development Impact Fees Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065, 14 Cal Code Regs. Section 15060(c)(2), and 15378 because it has no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Even if accepting the Development Impact Fees Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 did constitute a project under CEQA,
Res. No. 26-XX 3
this action is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies), 15273 (Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges) and this activity falls within the "common sense" CEQA exemption as set forth in 14 Cal.
Code Regs. Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” Therefore, the proposed acceptance of the Development Impact Fees Report for Fiscal Year 2023- 2024 does not warrant further environmental review. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis. Individual projects will undergo CEQA analysis as necessary.
Section 3. The City Council of the City of Concord hereby finds the following as required by Government Code Section 66001(d) and based upon review of the Development Impact Fees Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025:
a. The purpose of the development impact fees has been identified. b. There is a continued need for improvements and that there is reasonable relationship between the fees and the impacts for development for which the fees are collected. c. There remains a reasonable relationship between the current need for the Inclusionary Housing In-lieu, Parking In-lieu, Offsite Street Improvement Program, Master Storm Drain, and Art in Public Places fees and the purpose for which they were originally identified.
d. The sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete the financing of improvements has been identified.
e. The approximate dates for funding capital improvements are included in the City’s 2025- 2029 Capital Improvement Program, unless the improvements are longer term projects or are planned by another agency.
Section 4. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. //
//
//
//
Res. No. 26-XX 4
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Concord on January 13, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers -
NOES: Councilmembers -
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers -
ABSENT: Councilmembers -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-XX was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord on January 13, 2026.
Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Susanne Meyer Brown
City Attorney
Exhibit A: Development Impact Fees Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025
City of Concord
Development Impact Fees Report
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025
Exhibit A
Introduction
City of Concord 1
Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Legal requirements for Development Impact Fees Reporting ..................................................... 2 Annual Report Requirements .................................................................................................... 3 Five-Year Report Requirements ................................................................................................. 4 Capital Improvement Program .................................................................................................. 5 Annual Report .............................................................................................................................. 6 Description of Development Impact Fees .................................................................................. 6 Current Fee Schedule ............................................................................................................... 7 Annual Financial Summary ........................................................................................................... 9 Development Impact Fees Fund Balance ................................................................................ 10 Arts in Public Places Fund ....................................................................................................... 11 Housing Inclusionary Fund ..................................................................................................... 13 Parking In-Lieu Fund ............................................................................................................... 15 Off-Site Improvement Program (OSIP) Fund ............................................................................. 17 Traffic Mitigation Bailey Rd Improvements Fund ...................................................................... 22 Storm Drain Funds ................................................................................................................. 24 Interfund Transfers or Loans ................................................................................................... 45 Summary of Refunds .............................................................................................................. 45 Five-Year Report and Findings .................................................................................................... 46 Inclusionary Housing Fee ........................................................................................................ 46 Parking In-lieu Fee .................................................................................................................. 47 Traffic Mitigation Fees ............................................................................................................. 47 Drainage Acreage Fees ........................................................................................................... 49
Introduction
City of Concord 2
Introduction
Legal requirements for Development Impact Fees Reporting The City collects several fees that fall under the purview of the Mitigation Fee Act.
The Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000 et. seq.) requires each local agency to make public a report on developer fees within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year. The City of Concord (City) completed its year-end audit and posted the required Assembly Bill (AB)1600 report to the City’s website on Friday, December 26, 2025, which also incorporates the new inclusionary housing in-lieu fee reporting requirements of AB 2663 (2024, Grayson) (Government Code Section 65906.6). Section 66006(b)(2) requires each local agency to review the report at a regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after the information is made available to the public. The City collects several fees that fall under the purview of the Mitigation Fee Act.
AB 1600 (Statutes of 1998, Mitigation Fee Act), codified as Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. governs how public agencies collect, maintain, and spend impact fees imposed on developers for the purpose of defraying costs of public facilities. AB 1600 sets forth a number of requirements that local agencies must follow if they exact fees from developers to defray the cost of constructing public facilities related to development projects, and mandates reporting requirements for these fees. In 2024, Governor Newsom signed into law AB 2663 (Government Code Section 65906.6) which becomes effective January 1, 2026, requiring that jurisdictions that have inclusionary housing fees to report and publish the amount of fees collected over the previous year and the past five years and identify any projects that the fees have been spent on.
Through the General Plan and various fee studies, the City has established the nexus between development, the capital improvements necessary to mitigate the effects of development, and approved fees to fund the mitigation measures.
Introduction
City of Concord 3
Annual Report Requirements
California Government Code Section 66006 (b) requires each local agency that imposes development impact fees subject to the Mitigation Fee Act to prepare an annual report providing specific information about those fees for the previous fiscal year. Specifically, Section 66006 (b) requires that for each separate account, the local agency shall make available to the public the information shown below for the most recent fiscal year. • Section 66006 (b) (1)
• (A): A brief description of the type of fee in the account or Fund. • (B): The amount of the fees.
• (C) The beginning (July 1) and ending (June 30) balance of a particular impact fee fund or account.
• (D): The amount of the fees collected and interest earned by fund or account. • (E): An identification of each public improvement upon which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees. • (F)
• (i): An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement. • (ii): An identification of each public improvement identified in a previous report pursuant to clause (i) and whether construction began on the approximate date noted in the previous report
• (iii): For a project identified pursuant to clause (ii) for which construction did not commence by the approximate date provided in the previous report, the reason for the delay and a revised approximate date that the local agency will commence construction
• (G): A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended; and, in the case of an interfund loan, the terms of the loan, including the repayment schedule for the loan, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
• (H): A summary of any refunds made, and their respective amount, due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing of scheduled public improvements and
Introduction
City of Concord 4
the amount of reallocation of funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded. •
Section 66006 (b) (2)
• Review the report at a public meeting not less than 15 days after the report is released to the public.
Additionally, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65906.6, the City is required to annually post on its website the following:
(1) The amount of inclusionary housing in-lieu fees collected in the previous year. (2) Whether the inclusionary housing in-lieu fees are intended to be used for a project, if any.
Commencing on January 1, 2026 and every five years thereafter, the City is also required to post on its website both of the following:
(1) The amount of inclusionary housing in-lieu fees collected in the past five years. (2) The projects that the inclusionary housing in-lieu fees were spent on.
The City is in compliance with these reporting requirements mentioned above and has included in-lieu fees into this year’s report.
Five-Year Report Requirements
California Government Code Section 66001 (d) (1) requires the local agency make all the following findings every fifth year with respect to that portion of the account remaining unexpended, whether encumbered to a specific project or remaining unencumbered in an impact fee fund.
• Section 66001 (d) (1)
• (A): Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put. • (B): Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged.
• (C): Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements identified when the fee was established or increased. • (D): Designate the approximate dates when the anticipated funding will be secured to complete the identified improvements. This report and resolution passed by council at the next council meeting satisfy the reporting and findings required for developer fees.
Introduction
City of Concord 5
With respect to fees collected from developers that are not expended within five years, state law recognizes that some project costs can be of a magnitude that it takes more than five years to accrue adequate funds, or that matching funds may not be available within the five-year period.
Capital Improvement Program
The State of California Government Code Section 66002 states that local agencies that have developed a fee program may adopt a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) indicating the approximate location, size and timing of projects, plus an estimate for the cost of all facilities or improvements to be financed by fees. A formal CIP is recommended, at a minimum, as well as a five-year plan. The City bi-annually produces a five-year CIP which helps to maintain and support the City’s General Plan as well as identify situations where infrastructure is needed to accommodate the planned development.
The City’s current, adopted 2-year Capital Budget for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024-2025 and 2025- 2026, and the 5-year Capital Improvement Plan FY 2025-2029 can be found on the City’s website at https://cityofconcord.org/272/Capital-Improvement-Plan and are incorporated by reference herein.
Annual Report
City of Concord 6
Annual Report
Description of Development Impact Fees
Art in Public Places Fees (Fund 285): The City rescinded this fee in 1996 and has since expended all the original fee revenues collected prior to that time. Revenues are occasionally added to the fund from other sources and interest from account balance have kept the account alive, so the reporting of these funds are included in the annual AB1600 reports. The fund has been used to support public art on traffic signal cabinets. Three years after the funds have been fully expended the account can be closed.
Inclusionary Housing Fee (Fund 251): This fee was established by Ordinance 04-3 in 2004 and updated most recently on March 14, 2024. The fee is intended to be used for housing projects and programs that serve very low-, low- and/or moderate-income households. All residential developments with five or more units must include the number of Inclusionary Units as required in the ordinance or, if eligible, pay the in-lieu fee as provided in the City’s Fees and Charges Schedule.
Parking In-Lieu Fees (Fund 455): This is a voluntary fee that a developer may pay the City as an alternative means of complying with the parking requirements within the Downtown Parking District. This fee was established by Ordinance 954 in 1973 with amendments made in 1977 (Ordinance 77-1084) and 2017 (Ordinance 17-6). The fee is intended to fund parking improvements in the core area of the downtown. All development projects in the Downtown Pedestrian (DP) and Downtown Mixed Use (DMX) districts must meet requirements for on-site parking and loading as specified in Concord Municipal Code Sections 18.160.050 and
18.160.060. More specifically, for projects located within the Downtown Parking District, pursuant to Section18.160.060 B., a developer can request the Planning Commission to allow payment of an in-lieu fee instead of providing some or all of the required on-site parking spaces.
Traffic Mitigation Fees (Funds 410, 420 & 461): Traffic Mitigation Fees were established by Ordinance 05-5 in July 2005. The fees are collected from developers to improve transportation elements of our infrastructure. Primarily these funds have been used to provide improvements to traffic signals, signal operations, and lane configurations supporting all modes of travel. Fund 410 is included in the report as it contains historical transactions; however, all funds have been
Annual Report
City of Concord 7
moved to Fund 420 and Fund 410 and will be closed. Fund 461 Fee was collected under a mitigation fee agreement with the City of Pittsburg for the Bailey Road Estates development on Bailey Road near the Concord city limit. The fee will be used to improve traffic at the intersections of Bailey Road/Myrtle Drive and Bailey Road/Concord Boulevard.
Master Storm Drain/Drainage Acreage Fees (Funds 430-440): The collection of developer fees to improve the storm drain system in certain parts of Concord was originally adopted by Ordinance 856 in August of 1971. These fees are used to fund capital projects consistent with the Storm Drain Master Plan.
Current Fee Schedule
Art in Public Places Fees (Fund 285): The City rescinded this fee in 1996 and has since expended all the original fee revenues collected prior to that time.
Inclusionary Housing Fee (Fund 251):
In-lieu Fee (Project sizes 10
units or greater)
Ownership $20 per gross square foot of market-rate development Rental $15 per gross square foot of market-rate development Fractional In-Lieu Fee
Ownership $254,838 x fractional unit
Rental $173,034 x fractional unit
Parking In
-Lieu Fees (Fund 455):
Single non-residential $1,572/space
Multifamily residential projects $25,000/space
Traffic Mitigation Fees (Funds 410, 420 & 461):
Off-Site Street Improvement Program Fees
Single family unit (per dwelling unit) $3,251/unit
Annual Report
City of Concord 8
Accessory Dwelling Unit (750sqft to
1200sqft and larger than 40% of primary
dwelling)
$1,626/unit
Accessory Dwelling Unit (750sqft to
1200sqft and 40% or smaller than primary
dwelling)
$1,073/unit
Multi family unit, including condominium and
townhouse
$2,624/unit
Commercial $8.81/gross sq.ft.
Office $7.07/gross sq.ft.
Industrial $2.98/gross sq.ft.
Mini-storage $1.51/gross sq.ft.
Master Storm Drain/Drainage Acreage Fees (Funds 430-440):
Drainage Area Fee – City
Area 5 $2,178/acre
Area 7 $3,831/acre
Area 23/24 $2,709/acre
Area 50 $4,211/acre
Area 90 $3,414/acre
Area 92 $2,417/acre
Drainage Area Fee – County
Area 128 $0.17/sq.ft.
Area 22 $0.05/sq.ft.
Area 33B $0.70/sq.ft.
Area 33C $0.44/sq.ft.
Area 48B $0.68/sq.ft.
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 9
Annual Financial Summary
In the preceding fiscal year, the City administered a range of developer fees subject to mandatory reporting requirements. These fees encompass:
1. Inclusionary Housing Fee
2. Parking In-lieu Fee
3. Traffic Mitigation Fees, including:
a) Off-Site Street Improvement Program (OSIP)
b) Bailey Road Traffic Improvements
4. Drainage Acreage Fees
The City no longer collects the Arts in Public Places fees following their rescission by the Council in 1996.
A detailed transaction report is included below, providing a comprehensive breakdown of each fee collected by the City. This report includes itemized expenditure and revenue data for each fee category. It is important to note that not all development projects are subject to each of these fees; requirements vary based on the nature and scope of individual projects.
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 10
Development Impact Fees Fund Balance
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT
ASSIGNED FUND BALANCE
AS OF 06-30-25
TOTAL
FUND FUND COMMITED ASSIGNED UNASSIGNED
BALANCE TO PROJECTS FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE
251 HOUSING
INCLUSIONARY 2,059,926$ -$ -$ -$ 2,059,926$ 285 ART IN PUBLIC
PLACES 67,223$ -$ 24,240$ 24,240$ 42,983$ 455 PARKING IN LIEU 60,283$ -$ -$ -$ 60,283$ 410 OSIP CITY WIDE -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 420 OSIP 4,034,263$ 155,918 $ 1,603,663$ 1,759,580$ 2,274,683$ 461TRAFFIC MITIGATION B 356,215$ -$ 242,000$ 242,000$ 114,215$ 430 STORM DRAIN 1 14,251$ -$ -$ -$ 14,251$ 431 STORM DRAIN 92 140,337$ -$ -$ -$ 140,337$ 432 STORM DRAIN 5 57,573$ -$ -$ -$ 57,573$ 433 STORM DRAIN 7 6,673$ -$ -$ -$ 6,673$ 434 STORM DRAIN 22 49,117$ -$ -$ -$ 49,117$ 435 STORM DRAIN 23 265,639$ -$ -$ -$ 265,639$ 436 STORM DRAIN 50 57,366$ -$ -$ -$ 57,366$ 437 STORM DRAIN 90 36,968$ -$ -$ -$ 36,968$ 438 STORM DRAIN 33A 154,127$ -$ -$ -$ 154,127$ 439 STORM DRAIN 128 5,695$ -$ -$ -$ 5,695$ 441 STORM DRAIN 23/24 -$ -$ -$ -$
ENCUM-
BERED
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 11
Arts in Public Places Fund
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 285
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 1,423$ 757$ 1,736$ 2,455$ 2,785$ Other -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total 1,423$ 757$ 1,736$ 2,455$ 2,785$
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Supplies -$ -$ 10,000$ 1,520$ 760$ Creative Concord Murals -$ 28,344$ -$ -$ -$ Todos Santsos Utility Box Art -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total -$ 28,344$ 10,000$ 1,520$ 760$ Rev/over(under) Exp 1,423$ (27,587)$ (8,264)$ 935$ 2,025$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 1,423$ (27,587)$ (8,264)$ 935$ 2,025$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 98,691$ 100,114$ 72,527$ 64,263$ 65,198$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 100,114$ 72,527$ 64,263$ 65,198$ 67,223$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 12
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 285: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
Supplies 760$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure 760$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 760$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
IMPROVEMENT NAME
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 13
Housing Inclusionary Fund
*No projects associated with this account were completed in Fiscal Years 2021 – 2025.
HOUSING INCLUSIONARY FUND 251
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees 61,876$ -$ -$
Interest 27,423 16,121$ 50,088$ 63,340$ 84,293$ Other Revenue
Total 89,299$ 16,121$ 50,088$ 63,340$ 84,293$
EXPENDITURES
First Time Home Buyer Loans 20,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ -$ Administration - 20,177$ 27,900$ 37,935$ 16,700$ Total 20,000$ 50,177$ 57,900$ 67,935$ 16,700$ Rev/over(under) Exp 69,299$ (34,056)$ (7,812)$ (4,595)$ 67,593$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfer In -$ -$ -$ -$ 334,957$ Transfers Out - - - (334,957) Total -$ -$ -$ (334,957)$ 334,957$
Excess(Deficiency) of Rev &
Other Source
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 69,299$ (34,056)$ (7,812)$ (339,552)$ 402,550$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 1,873,258$ 1,942,557$ 1,908,501$ 1,900,690$ 1,561,138$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 1,942,557$ 1,908,501$ 1,900,690$ 1,561,138$ 1,963,688$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 14
HOUSING INCLUSIONARY FUND 251: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ -$ N/A N/A Subtotal, Capital Expenditures -$
Other Expenditures
Administration 16,700$ -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditures 16,700$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16,700$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
IMPROVEMENT NAME
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 15
Parking In-Lieu Fund
PARKING IN LIEU FUND 455
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees 209,432$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 1,349 1,961 6,098 9,455 4,719 Other Revenue - - - - Total 210,781$ 1,961$ 6,098$ 9,455$ 4,719$
EXPENDITURES
Refund Prior Period Building Per -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ Rev/over(under) Exp 210,781$ 1,961$ 6,098$ 9,455$ (195,281)$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfer In -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out - - - - -
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Excess(Deficiency) of Rev & Other Source
Over(Under) Exp & Other Financ 210,781$ 1,961$ 6,098$ 9,455$ (195,281)$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 27,268$ 238,049$ 240,011$ 246,109$ 255,564$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 238,049$ 240,011$ 246,109$ 255,564$ 60,283$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 16
PARKING IN LIEU FUND 455: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
Refund Prior Period Building
Permit 200,000$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure 200,000$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 200,000$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
IMPROVEMENT NAME
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 17
Off-Site Improvement Program (OSIP) Fund
OSIP CITYWIDE FUND 410
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - Other Revenue - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
EXPENDITURES
Traffic Signal Geom. ImpDesign
2284 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfer In
Transfers Out (200,000) (14,808) - - - Total (200,000)$ (14,808)$ -$ -$ -$
Excess(Deficiency) of Rev & Other Source
Over(Under) Exp & Other Financ (200,000)$ (14,808)$ -$ -$ -$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 14,808$ 14,808$ -$ -$ -$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 (185,192)$ (0)$ -$ -$ -$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 18
OSIP CITYWIDE FUND 410: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 19
OSIP FUND 420
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees 399,116$ 860,532$ 1,530,988$ 272,038$ (41,359)$ Interest 30,245 21,462 95,554 162,927 168,928 Other - - - - - Total 429,361$ 881,994$ 1,626,542$ 434,965$ 127,569$
EXPENDITURES
Replace Controller /Cabinet at
Signalized Intersection 2462 - - - 89,890 - Citywide Traffic System
Upgrade PJ2493 - - - 93,067 - Traffic Safety - Commerce Ave
PJ2085 282,832 60,311 6,100 - - Citywide Signal Retiming
PJ2508 - - 22,907 - - OSIP update PJ2541 - - 71,283 188,538 24,575 Citywide Traffic System 2
PJ2698 - - - 4,829 3,170 Countywide Smart Signal
PJ2699 - - - 499,173 Traffic Calming - Willow Pass &
Clayton Rd 14,433 - $0 $2,458
Smart Signal Project PJ2701 155,473$
Total 297,265$ 60,311$ 100,290$ 877,955$ 183,218$ Rev/over(under) Exp 132,096$ 821,683$ 1,526,252$ (442,990)$ (55,649)$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 20
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In - 14,808 - - - Transfers Out 246,971 (314) - - - Total 246,971$ 14,494$ -$ -$ -$
Excess(Deficiency) of Rev &
Other Source 379,067$ 836,177$ 1,526,252$ (442,990)$ (55,649)$ Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses
FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 1,791,407$ 2,170,474$ 3,006,651$ 4,532,903$ 4,089,913$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 2,170,474 3,006,651 4,532,903 4,089,913 4,034,263
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 21
OSIP FUND 420: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
Replace Controller /Cabinet
at Sig Int 2462 -$ N/A On-going N/A
Citywide Traffic System
Upgrade PJ2493 -$ 3,407,134$ Complete 0%
Traffic Safety - Commerce
Ave PJ2085 -$ N/A Complete N/A
Citywide Signal Retiming
PJ2508 -$ N/A On-going N/A
OSIP update PJ2541 24,575$ 600,000$ On-going 4% Citywide Traffic System 2
PJ2698 3,170$ 819,297$ 7/1/2023 0.4%
Countywide Smart Signal
PJ2699 -$ 3,853,656$ 7/1/2023 0%
Traffic Safety Traffic Calming
Program 2464 -$ N/A On-going N/A
Smart Signal Project PJ2701 155,473$ 240,000$ 7/1/2023 65% Subtotal, Capital Expenditure 183,218$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 183,218$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 22
Traffic Mitigation Bailey Rd Improvements Fund
TRAFFIC MITIGATION BAILEY RD IMPROVEMENTS FUND 461
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 4,522 2,621 8,149 12,635 14,701
Other - - - - - Total 4,522$ 2,621$ 8,149$ 12,635$ 14,701$
EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Purchase MacDonald-Rain 373
Installation MacDonald-Rain
Historical Mural/Fontes 384
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 4,522$ 2,621$ 8,149$ 12,635$ 14,701$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Operating transfers in -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Operating transfers out - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 4,522$ 2,621$ 8,149$ 12,635$ 14,701$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 313,587$ 318,109$ 320,730$ 328,879$ 341,514$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 318,109$ 320,730$ 328,879$ 341,514$ 356,215$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 23
TRAFFIC MITIGATION BAILEY RD IMPROVEMENTS FUND 461: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 24
Storm Drain Funds
STORM DRAIN #1 FUND 430
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 181 105 326 505 588
Total 181$ 105$ 326$ 505$ 588$
EXPENDITURES
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 181$ 105$ 326$ 505$ 588$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 181$ 105$ 326$ 505$ 588$
FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 12,546$ 12,727$ 12,832$ 13,158$ 13,663$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 12,727$ 12,832$ 13,158$ 13,663$ 14,251$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 25
STORM DRAIN #1 FUND 430: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 26
STORM DRAIN #92 FUND 431
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees 0 0
Interest 1,781 1,033 3,210 4,978 5,792
Total 1,781$
1,033$ 3,210$ 4,978$ 5,792$
EXPENDITURES
Vista del Monte Storm Drain 789
Monument Ct Storm Drain 1821
- - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 0 0
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 1,781$ 1,033$ 3,210$ 4,978$ 5,792$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In - - - - - Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 1,781$ 1,033$ 3,210$ 4,978$ 5,792$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 123,544$ 125,325$ 126,357$ 129,567$ 134,545$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 125,325 126,357 129,567 134,545 140,337
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 27
STORM DRAIN #92 FUND 431: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 28
STORM DRAIN #5 FUND 432
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
``
REVENUE
Fees -$ 10,607$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 581 369 1,317 2,042 2,376
Total 581$ 10,975$ 1,317$ 2,042$ 2,376$
EXPENDITURES
Mt Diablo Creek Study Area 203 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 581$ 10,975$ 1,317$ 2,042$ 2,376$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 581$ 10,975$ 1,317$ 2,042$ 2,376$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 40,282$ 40,863$ 51,838$ 53,155$ 55,197$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 40,863$ 51,838$ 53,155$ 55,197$ 57,573$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 29
STORM DRAIN #5 FUND 432: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 30
STORM DRAIN #7 FUND 433
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 85 49 153 236 275
Other
Total 85$ 49$ 153$ 236$ 275$
EXPENDITURES
La Bonita Storm Drain 744
Gross Lane 1831 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ La Bonita Storm Drain 1251 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Lillian Drive Drainage Im 2005 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Farm Bureau Floodplain Amendm -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 85$ 49$ 153$ 236$ 275$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 85 49 153 236 275
FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 5,875$ 5,960$ 6,009$ 6,162$ 6,398$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 5,960$ 6,009$ 6,162$ 6,398$ 6,673$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 31
STORM DRAIN #7 FUND 433: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 32
STORM DRAIN #22 FUND 434
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 626 363 1,124 1,743 2,027
Total 626$ 363$ 1,124$ 1,743$ 2,027$
EXPENDITURES
Operational Storm Drain Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 626$ 363$ 1,124$ 1,743$ 2,027$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 626$ 363$ 1,124$ 1,743$ 2,027$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 43,235$ 43,861$ 44,223$ 45,347$ 47,090$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 43,861$ 44,223$ 45,347$ 47,090$ 49,117$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 33
STORM DRAIN #22 FUND 434: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 34
STORM DRAIN #23 FUND 435
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees 1,781$ 28,270$ 41,518$ 8,157$ -$ Interest 2,259 1,466 5,737 9,241 10,963
Total 4,040$ 29,735$ 47,255$ 17,398$ 10,963$
EXPENDITURES
Sunset Ave Storm Drain 1916
Replacement of Curbs & Gutters -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 4,040$ 29,735$ 47,255$ 17,398$ 10,963$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In from fund 441 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 4,040$ 29,735$ 47,255$ 17,398$ 10,963$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 156,248$ 160,288$ 190,023$ 237,278$ 254,676$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 160,288$ 190,023$ 237,278$ 254,676$ 265,639$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 35
STORM DRAIN #23 FUND 435: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 36
STORM DRAIN #50 FUND 436
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 728 422 1,312 2,035 2,368 Total $728 $422 $1,312 $2,035 $2,368
EXPENDITURES
Galindo Creek Study 1833 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
- - - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 728$ 422$ 1,312$ 2,035$ 2,368$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 728$ 422$ 1,312$ 2,035$ 2,368$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 50,501$ 51,229$ 51,651$ 52,963$ 54,998$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 51,229$ 51,651$ 52,963$ 54,998$ 57,366$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 37
STORM DRAIN #50 FUND 436: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 38
STORM DRAIN #90 FUND 437
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ 683$ Interest 460 267 830 1,287 1,518
Total 460$ 267$ 830$ 1,287$ 2,200$
EXPENDITURES
Sunset Ave Storn Drain 1916
Kona Kai Storm Drain 2006 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Farm Bureau Floodplain Amendm -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 460$ 267$ 830$ 1,287$ 2,200$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 460$ 267$ 830$ 1,287$ 2,200$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 31,924$ 32,384$ 32,650$ 33,480$ 34,767$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 32,384$ 32,650$ 33,480$ 34,767$ 36,968$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 39
STORM DRAIN #90 FUND 437: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 40
STORM DRAIN #33A FUND 438
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 1,956 1,134 3,526 5,467 6,361 Total 1,956$ 1,134$ 3,526$ 5,467$ 6,361$
EXPENDITURES
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 1,956$ 1,134$ 3,526$ 5,467$ 6,361$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 1,956$ 1,134$ 3,526$ 5,467$ 6,361$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 135,683$ 137,639$ 138,773$ 142,299$ 147,766$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 137,639$ 138,773$ 142,299$ 147,766$ 154,127$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 41
STORM DRAIN #33A FUND 438: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 42
STORM DRAIN #128 FUND 439
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees 510$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 277$ 163$ 128$ 275$ 235$
Total 787$ 163$ 128$ 275$ 235$
EXPENDITURES
Operational Storm Drain Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 787$ 163$ 128$ 275$ 235$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 787$ 163$ 128$ 275$ 235$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 4,107$ 4,894$ 5,057$ 5,185$ 5,460$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 4,894$ 5,057$ 5,185$ 5,460$ 5,695$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 43
STORM DRAIN #128 FUND 439: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 44
STORM DRAIN #33B FUND 440
REVENUES & EX PENDITURES
FY21 to FY25
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
REVENUE
Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 982$ 569$ 1,422$ 2,275$ 2,569$
Total 982$ 569$ 1,422$ 2,275$ 2,569$
EXPENDITURES
Operational Storm Drain Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Rev/over(under) Exp 982$ 569$ 1,422$ 2,275$ 2,569$
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers In -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfers Out - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Excess(Deficiency) of
Rev and Other Sources
Over(Under) Exp & Other
Financing Uses 982$ 569$ 1,422$ 2,275$ 2,569$ FUND BALANCES, JULY 1 54,436$ 55,418$ 55,986$ 57,408$ 59,683$ FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30 55,418$ 55,986$ 57,408$ 59,683$ 62,252$
Annual Financial Summary
City of Concord 45
Interfund Transfers or Loans
In the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, there were no interfund transfers or loans made from any of the impact fee, capacity fee, or in-lieu fee accounts.
Summary of Refunds
At this time, all fees collected have been earmarked for current or future capital projects necessary to maintain the current levels of service within existing service areas to serve new development.
STORM DRAIN #33B FUND 440: FY 2024/25 EXPENDITURES
Capital Expenditures
No Capital Expenditures -$ N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
Other Expenditures
No Other Expenditures -$
Subtotal, Capital Expenditure -$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$
No projects associated with this account were completed in the Fiscal year 2024/25.
FY 25
ACCOUNT
EXPEND
TOTAL
PROJECT
COST
APPROX
DATE OF
PROJECT
COMMENC
FY25
EXPEND AS
% OF
TOTAL
COST
IMPROVEMENT NAME
Five-Year Report and Findings
City of Concord 46
Five-Year Report and Findings
Inclusionary Housing Fee
• The Inclusionary Housing Fee was established by Ordinance 04-3 in 2004 and updated most recently on March 14, 2024. The fee is intended to be used for housing projects and programs that serve very low-, low and/or moderate-income households. This fee allows for new residential developments to contribute to the creation of affordable housing options within the community, either through direct construction of affordable units or by providing financial resources for affordable housing initiatives. All residential developments with five or more units must include the number of inclusionary units as required in the ordinance or if eligible, pay the in-lieu fee as provided in the City’s Fees and Charges Schedule.
• The fees are charged to support affordable housing development, which directly addresses the housing needs created by new market-rate residential projects. The funds support the City’s First-Time Homebuyer Program, a second mortgage loan program that assists qualified low- and moderate-income households to purchase a home. The program was initially funded by Redevelopment and subsequently Successor Agency funds and is now will be funded by Inclusionary Housing Fees. The fees have been used to cover certain administrative costs while the funds were built up to support loan assistance. Typically, this program has been able to fund three loans each year. Staff evaluates the revenue over the previous five years and makes adjustments to the loan program to ensure expenditure of the funds are compliant with AB1600 and the new AB 2663 requirements.
Project Name Est. Start
Date & %
Funded
by Fee
Future Funding
FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030
First-Time
Home Buyer
Program
Ongoing
100% $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000
Program
Administration
Ongoing
100% $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000
Five-Year Report and Findings
City of Concord 47
Parking In-lieu Fee
• This Parking In-lieu Fee was established by Ordinance 954 in 1973 with amendments in 1977 (Ordinance 77-1084) and 2017 (Ordinance 17-6) . The fee is intended to fund parking improvements in the core area of the downtown. The purpose of this fee is to provide developers with a voluntary alternative to providing required on-site parking spaces. All development projects in the Downtown Pedestrian (DP) and Downtown Mixed Use (DMX) districts must meet requirements for on-site parking and loading as specified in Concord Municipal Code Sections 18.160.050 and 18.160.060. More specifically, for projects located in the Downtown Parking District, pursuant to Section18.160.060 B., a developer can request the Planning Commission to allow payment of an in-lieu fee instead of providing some or all of the required on-site parking spaces. • The fee is charged to support parking within the Downtown Business District with the purpose of funding off-street parking facilities, mass transit equipment, or transportation system management projects.
Project Name Estimated
Start Date
Total Project
Cost
% Funded
with Fee
Revenue
Grant Funded Parking Implementation
Project No. 2799(1)
7/1/2027 $1,100,000 5%
Notes
(1)Potential other funding sources include grants.
Traffic Mitigation Fees
• Traffic Mitigation Fees were established by Ordinance 05-5 in July 2005. The fee is intended to fund street system improvements and transportation-related infrastructure to accommodate increased traffic generated by new development. These improvements are needed to mitigate the impacts of expected development in the City, and thereby prevent deterioration in public infrastructure.
• The fees are collected from developers to improve transportation elements of the City’s infrastructure. Primarily these funds have been used to provide improvements to traffic
Five-Year Report and Findings
City of Concord 48
signals, signal operations and improvements to lane configurations supporting all modes of travel. Traffic Mitigation Fund monies are programmed as part of the Ten-Year Traffic Improvement Program (TIP), which is the long-range planning and funding tool for transportation projects within the combined Fiscal Year 2025 and Fiscal Year 2026 Capital Improvement Budget (CIP). The City intends to use a portion of the unallocated funds for current and future active projects. Additionally, the City must have adequate funds on hand to leverage and provide local matching funds as required when other funding sources become available for OSIP identified transportation projects. A portion of the unallocated fund balance will be used for that purpose. If any fees are not expended within the five-year requirement, projects are programmed where the development fees will be utilized, thereby complying with AB 1600 requirements.
Project Name
Est.
Start
Date &
%
Funded
by Fee
Prior
Funding
Future Funding
FY2026(1) FY2027(1) FY2028(2) FY2029(2) FY2030(2)
Replace Controllers at
Intersections (2462)(3)
Ongoing
22% $200,000
Traffic Safety & Calming
(2464)(3)
Ongoing
33% $100,000
Citywide Signal Retiming
(2508)(4)
Ongoing
57% $277,100 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 OSIP Update (2541) 7/1/2024
100% $600,000
Citywide Traffic System
Upgrade (2493+2698)(5)
Ongoing
10% $260,000
Citywide Traffic
Monitoring (2537)(4)
Ongoing
41%
$200,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
Innovative
Transportation Program
(2573)(6)
Ongoing
62%
$1,000,000
Five-Year Report and Findings
City of Concord 49
Adaptive Traffic Control
on WPR (2783)
Ongoing
100% $200,000
Smart Signal Project
(2701)
Ongoing
100% $240,000
Notes
(1)FY2024-25 and FY2025-26 project budgets have been approved by Council as part of the Two- Year Capital Budget.
(2)Within the Capital Improvement Plan FY2025-2029, OSIP Funds have been earmarked for these projects.
(3)This ongoing program is also funded with Measure V, and Measure J. (4)This ongoing program is also funded with Measure J.
(5)This ongoing program is also funded with Federal/State Grants, Measure J, Gas Tax, and Measure V.
(6)This ongoing program is also funded with Measure V.
Drainage Acreage Fees
• The collection of developer fees to improve the storm drain system in certain parts of Concord was originally adopted by Ordinance 856 in August of 1971. Development within the City has placed a serious demand upon its existing storm drain facilities. In order to offset these impacts, Drainage Acreage Fees are collected. The fees are intended to provide an equitable manner of apportionment of the cost of future storm drainage facilities due to the development of real property within the City. The fees collected are in proportion to the per acre basis of development and the drainage boundary area which the development is located in.
• These fees are used to fund capital projects consistent with the Storm Drain Master Plan.
Fees that are collected can be used to construct planned drainage facilities within the charged drainage area, maintenance or repair, addressing impervious surface runoff, and flood prevention.
Five-Year Report and Findings
City of Concord 50
Project Name(1) Estimated Start
Date
Total Project
Cost
% Funded with
Fee Revenue Prior Funding
Stormwater Pipe
Replacement-
Area 1
7/1/2029 $150,000 0% $0
Stormwater Pipe
Replacement-
Area 92
7/1/2029 $150,000 0% $0
Stormwater Pipe
Replacement-
Area 5
7/1/2029 $150,000 0% $0
Stormwater Pipe
Replacement-
Area 7
7/1/2029 $150,000 0% $0
Stormwater Pipe
Replacement-
Area 22
7/1/2029 $150,000 0% $0
Stormwater Pipe
Replacement-
Area 23
7/1/2029 $150,000 0% $0
Stormwater Pipe
Replacement-
Area 50
7/1/2029 $150,000 0% $0
Stormwater Pipe
Replacement-
Area 90
7/1/2029 $150,000 0% $0
Stormwater Pipe
Replacement-
Area 33A
7/1/2029 $150,000 0% $0
Stormwater Pipe
Replacement-
Area 128
7/1/2029 $150,000 0% $0
Stormwater Pipe
Replacement-
Area 33B
7/1/2029 $150,000 0% $0
Five-Year Report and Findings
City of Concord 51
Notes
(1)The Stormwater Pipe Replacement Projects listed have been identified in the Capital Improvement Plan as future projects. Funding will be transferred once sufficient fees have been collected to implement the construction.
Staff Report
Date: January 13, 2026
To: City Council
From: Valerie J. Barone, City Manager
Reviewed by: William Tarbox, Director of Public Works
Prepared by: Abhishek Parikh, Deputy Director PW - Transportation [email protected]
(925) 671-3139
Subject: Considering adoption of a Resolution accepting and appropriating a $300,000 grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to enhance the City’s Collision Dashboard and approval for use for the development of the Enhanced Collision Dashboard for Concord (Project TRA-26-001);
approval of a task order with TJKM Transportation
Consultants under the existing Master Services Agreement (MSA), Agreement No. CCA-6083, in an amount not to exceed $300,000 to develop and configure OTS grant-funded
dashboard features; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the task order in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
CEQA: Not a project/exempt per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15306, 15378, and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.
Report in Brief
The City of Concord was awarded $300,000 by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to enhance the City’s “Collision Dashboard” (referred to as a crash dashboard in the grant). This project will deliver a Concord-specific Dashboard using a combination of ongoing work funded through the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program and the newly awarded OTS grant. With the support of the SS4A grant, the city is approximately halfway through development of the dashboard, which integrates collision data, the High Injury Network (top corridors with high rate of fatal and severe
4.j4.j4.j
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.j
January 13, 2026
injury collisions), and roadway asset inventories to support data-driven identification of high-risk locations and evaluation of safety countermeasures.
The OTS grant will allow the City to integrate real-time and predictive analytics, law- enforcement decision-support tools, before-and-after evaluations, and project prioritization features into the dashboard. The dashboard is designed as a scalable platform and it will improve City staff’s ability to plan, implement, and measure roadway safety investments.
TJKM Transportation Consultants was selected by staff to develop the dashboard framework under the SS4A-funded Concord Safety Action Plan. The OTS grant will fund additional functionality and enhancements to the dashboard currently under development. Staff recommends issuing a task order to TJKM Transportation Consultants in the amount of $300,000 to complete this work and ensure continuity, efficiency, and alignment with the existing SS4A-funded dashboard development.
Recommended Action
Adopt a Resolution accepting and appropriating a $300,000 grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to enhance the City’s Collision Dashboard; approve a task order with TJKM Transportation Consultants under the existing Master Services Agreement (MSA), Agreement No. CCA-6083 in an amount not to exceed $300,000 to develop and configure OTS grant-funded dashboard features; and authorize the City Manager to execute the task order in a form acceptable to the City Attorney Background
The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant provides funding to support data- driven strategies that reduce traffic-related injuries and fatalities, with a strong emphasis on enforcement, monitoring, and measurable safety outcomes. The grant is intended to enhance a jurisdiction’s ability to identify collision trends, deploy targeted interventions, and evaluate the effectiveness of safety investments using timely and actionable data.
Staff applied and were successful in procuring funding to develop a Concord-specific Collision Dashboard to improve roadway safety through data-driven decision-making and more effective use of limited resources. The collision dashboard will consolidate collision data, high-injury network information, and roadway asset inventories into a single platform that allows staff to better identify high-risk locations, evaluate safety countermeasures, and prioritize investments based on measurable outcomes.
By adding real-time, predictive, and analytical capabilities over time, the dashboard will also support more proactive traffic safety and enforcement strategies, improve coordination between City departments, and provide a consistent framework to measure the effectiveness of safety projects. Overall, the Collision Dashboard will strengthen the City’s ability to plan, implement, and monitor safety improvements while ensuring that grant funding is used efficiently and transparently to deliver lasting reductions in traffic- related injuries and fatalities
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.j
January 13, 2026
Analysis
The Public Works Department’s Transportation Division is currently working on developing a Safety Action Plan for review and adoption by council around summer/fall of 2026 The goal of the Safety Action Plan is to plan transportation network improvements that reduce and eliminate fatal and serious injury crashes for all roadway users. The plan will be built upon robust planning, data collection, monitoring, and policy revisions, and it will include a clear roadmap of implementation actions based on proven, data-driven methods and strong community engagement. One of the key elements of the work plan is to build an enhanced collision dashboard.
The Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program is funding the foundational development of the Collision Dashboard, focusing on systemic safety planning and data integration. SS4A-funded work establishes the core framework by consolidating collision data, the High Injury Network, roadway asset inventories, and historical speed and red- light running data. These elements provide the analytical baseline needed to identify high-risk locations, evaluate safety counter measures, and support long-term, data- driven traffic safety planning.
The Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant builds directly upon this foundation by adding operational, enforcement, and evaluation capabilities that are outside the primary scope of SS4A. OTS-funded enhancements to the dashboard introduce real-time and predictive analytics, law-enforcement decision-support tools, before-and-after evaluation mechanisms, and project prioritization frameworks. These additions allow the City to move from planning and analysis to proactive intervention, near-real-time monitoring, and measurable performance tracking. By layering OTS-funded capabilities onto the SS4A-built dashboard framework, the City maximizes grant leverage, avoids duplicative investment, and creates a comprehensive safety management platform that supports both strategic planning and day-to-day traffic safety operations consistent with the mission of the California Office of Traffic Safety and the City’s goals of public safety.
Financial Impact
The total budget for this project is $300,000 and is fully funded by the OTS grant.
Environmental Determination
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15306, 15378, and Public Resources Code Section 21065, awarding a Professional Services Agreement is not subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, as it does not constitute a “project”, does not commit the City to a definite course of action, does not constitute discretionary approval of a specific project, and will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, consists of information gathering, and in the alternative is exempt from CEQA. No unusual circumstances exist and none of the exceptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgement and analysis.
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.j
January 13, 2026
Public Contact
The City Council Agenda was posted.
Attachments
1. Resolution Accepting and Appropriating Grant Funds for Enhancing Collision Dashboard in Concord
2. OTS Grant Agreement
Res. No. 26-XX 1
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Resolution Accepting and Appropriating a $300,000
Grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety
(OTS) to Enhance the City’s Collision Dashboard and
Approval for Use for the Development of the
Enhanced Collision Dashboard for Concord (Project
TRA-26-001)
Resolution No. 26-XX
/
WHEREAS, the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) approved grant funds to the City of Public Works Department in the amount of $300,000 as part of a collision dashboard upgrade; and WHEREAS, the funds will be used for developing enhanced collision dashboard in the City of Concord during the period of October 1, 2025, to September 30, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended acceptance of the California Office of the California Office of Traffic Safety grant funds in the amount of $300,000 for Enhancing the Crash Dashboard (Project TRA-26-001) (“Collision Dashboard”) in Concord to enhance public safety.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. This item is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it does not constitute a "project" within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065, CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2), 15273, and/or 15378 including subsection (b)(4) because there is no potential that it will result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and/or because it involves government funding/fiscal activities. If this were determined to be a “project” for CEQA analysis, this activity falls within the "Common Sense" CEQA exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment
Section 2. Accepts grant funds in the amount of $300,000.
Section 3. Authorizes the appropriation of these funds, authorizes the City Manager to use these funds for expenditure on the Collision Dashboard, and authorizes the City Manager to include Attachment 1
Res. No. 26-XX 2
such project in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and execute such documents as are necessary or desirable to accomplish such purposes, subject to City Attorney approval.
Section 4. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Concord on January 13, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers -
NOES: Councilmembers -
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers -
ABSENT: Councilmembers -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-XX was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord on January 13, 2026.
Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Susanne Meyer Brown
City Attorney
Attachment 2
Staff Report
Date: January 13, 2026
To: City Council
From: Valerie J. Barone, City Manager
Reviewed by: Mindy Gentry, Director of Community Development Carlton Thompson, PE, City Engineer
Prepared by: Bernard Enrile, PE, Senior Civil Engineer
[email protected]
(925) 671-3031
Subject: Considering approval of Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates in a not-to-exceed amount of $250,750 for project design and related services for the lower Mount Diablo Creek Restoration Study Project (Project No. 2805, FAIN No. HQ00052510032), and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. (Storm Water Management Fund, Federal Grant) CEQA: Not a project/exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15262, 15273, 15378, and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.
Report in Brief
The Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation (OLDCC) has provided the City grant funds to conduct a Hydrologic and Hydraulic Study of lower Mount Diablo Creek.
The creek crosses Port Chicago Highway and periodically floods impacting access to local businesses in the Commercial Circle area and the Military Ocean Terminal Concord (MOTCO). The grant is federally funded by the Department of War (DoW) through the OLDCC program.
Proposals from design firms were received through a competitive process and Environmental Science Associates (ESA) was selected as the most qualified firm to provide design and related services for the project. ESA has extensive experience in environmental, hydrologic, and hydraulic studies.
4.k4.k4.k4.k
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.k
January 13, 2026
After the approval of the Professional Services Agreement, the study is scheduled to commence in January 2026 and will be completed in December 2026. However, completing this study will not resolve flooding on Port Chicago Highway or in the Commercial Circle area. The results of the study are expected to support the Army Corp of Engineers in identifying future actions to be taken by MOTCO to ensure MOTCO’s mission readiness and improve the situation in the community. It is anticipated that future federal grant opportunities will exist to implement a solution, based on this study.
Recommended Action
Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates (ESA) in the not-to-exceed amount of $250,750 for project design and related services for lower Mount Diablo Creek Restoration Study Project (Project No. 2805; FAIN No.
HQ00052510032) (Attachment 2); authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; and make the CEQA determinations as provided in this staff report.
Background
After the winter storms in 2023 the commander for MOTCO met with City staff indicating that there could be federal funds available to financially contribute to efforts to prevent flooding at the main access point of MOTCO. The periodic flooding at Port Chicago Highway also affects Commercial Circle limiting access to Conco and other businesses.
MOTCO staff recommended that the City apply for a grant with the OLDCC, which is responsible for executing community planning assistance grants on behalf of the Department of War (DoW), conclude cooperative agreements, and supplement other federal programs to work with states and communities. The grant was approved and accepted by Council on May 27, 2025.
The Installation Readiness Program is a needs-based grant program designed to assist states and communities to work with nearby military installations to plan, enhance infrastructure, and implement measures that contribute to maintaining or improving a military installation’s readiness and lethality. Under this program, there is analysis of external threats and vulnerabilities to the military installation, which is used to develop mitigation strategies, and identify resources necessary to ensure the continuity of DoW and installation mission capabilities.
The lower Mount Diablo Creek Restoration Study (Study) will evaluate lower Mount Diablo Creek between State Route 4, through the MOTCO property and into Suisun Bay. More specifically, the Study will evaluate potential improvements to alleviate flooding problems, which includes a tabletop exercise to develop risk-based action plans for protecting vital community infrastructure during scenarios where manmade or natural events disrupt community members and MOTCO installation operations. The action plans will consider:
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.k
January 13, 2026
1. Environmentally sensitive channel improvements
2. Sediment management
3. Peak flow reduction (retention basins)
4. Bridge reconstruction
5. Floodplain management
Severe flooding occurs at Port Chicago Highway, near the north end of the Diablo Creek Golf Course, which affects access to businesses on Commercial Circle, the unincorporated town of Clyde’s primary access, and MOTCO’s primary (ACP1) and secondary (ACP2) access routes. The loss of access to the installation from either of the access control points disrupts MOTCO’s core mission to supply critical munitions to the troops.
Upper Mount Diablo Creek transects the Concord Naval Weapon Station property upstream of State Route 4, which has become the Concord Community Reuse Project (CRP). The CRP will be responsible for any improvements to upper Mount Diablo Creek from State Route 4 to Bailey Road. Lower Mount Diablo Creek suffers from high sedimentation due to upstream erosion and the effects of storm events.
The Study is expected to include the following elements to address the ongoing flooding issues:
1. Stream capacity and improvements necessary to convey design flows, significantly reducing the occurrence of flooding at ACP1 and ACP2
2. Options for storm water detention basins
3. Stream stability using bioengineering and traditional methods
4. Evaluation of constraints, including:
a. Flow constraints for creek improvements (bridges, culverts, etc.) b. Right-of-way constraints
c. Utility facilities
d. Buildings and other improvements
e. Bridges and culverts
5. Sediment basin options
6. Evaluation of Regulatory Agency permit expectations
7. Cost estimates
8. Compliment and enable ongoing projects for ACP1 and ACP2
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.k
January 13, 2026
Analysis
In order to prevent future and sustained flooding of ACP1 and ACP2 at MOTCO and Port Chicago Highway, a Hydrologic and Hydraulic Study of lower Mt Diablo Creek is necessary to develop engineering solutions that preserve critical access to the military installation and ingress and egress for surrounding community members. The Study will produce existing hydraulic water surface profiles for specific flood conditions and intervals as well as estimated water surface profiles for three potential improvement alternatives.
The grant will cover hiring a consultant to perform the Study, conduct two meetings, one with stakeholders such as MOTCO, Contra Costa County Flood Control, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Contra Costa Water District, TESORO, local businesses, and a representative from the unincorporated community of Clyde. The second meeting would report on the Study results and recommendations to the same stakeholder group.
Completion of this study will not solve the flooding challenges on Port Chicago Highway or within the Commercial Circle area. Instead, the study will inform the future engineering design services that are needed to initiate project design, update the traffic analysis, develop project plans and specifications, and determine final construction cost estimates.
The results of the Study are expected to support the Army Corp of Engineers in identifying future actions to be taken by MOTCO to ensure MOTCO’s mission readiness and improve the situation in the community. It is anticipated that future federal grant opportunities will exist to implement a solution, based on this study.
Procurement Process
Staff solicited proposals for the lower Mount Diablo Creek Restoration Study through a Request for Proposal (RFP). All procurement procedures performed followed Government Code 2 CRF 200. Based on the analysis of their written proposal, evaluation criteria, and interviews, staff recommends selecting Environmental Science Associates (ESA) to perform the requested services. ESA is qualified to perform the services needed and has significant experience performing environmental, hydraulic, and hydrologic studies for local agencies in California.
Staff negotiated an agreement in the amount of $250,750 for ESA to provide services for this project.
Financial Impact
The federal grant will fully fund the PSA. The City’s 10% local match requirement for the federal grant will be the contribution of 836 hours of staff time.
Environmental Determination
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4.k
January 13, 2026
Code Section 21000, et. seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively “CEQA”), approval of the Professional Services Agreement does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065, 14 Cal Code Regs. Section 15060(c)(2), and 15378 because it has no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Even if approval of the Professional Services Agreement did constitute a project under CEQA, this action is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies), 15273 (Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges) and this activity falls within the "common sense" CEQA exemption as set forth in 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” Therefore, the approval of the Professional Services Agreement does not warrant further environmental review. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis. Individual projects will undergo CEQA analysis as necessary.
Public Contact
The City Council Agenda was posted.
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. ESA Professional Services Agreement with Exhibit A, Scope of Services
OLDCC GRANT APPLICATION
Lower Mt. Diablo Creek Restoration
Watershed Map
Mount Diablo Creek
Attachment 1
OLDCC GRANT APPLICATION
Lower Mt. Diablo Creek Restoration
MOTCO Entrance at Clyde off Port Chicago Highway, looking south.
OLDCC GRANT APPLICATION
Lower Mt. Diablo Creek Restoration
Mt. Diablo Creek Bridge at Port Chicago Highway, looking south.
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
10/2022 1
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into on January 13, 2026 between the City of Concord, a California municipal corporation, ("CITY") and Environmental Science Associates (ESA), , 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1050, Oakland, California 94612 (“CONSULTANT”).
THE PARTIES ENTER THIS AGREEMENT based upon the following facts, understandings and intentions:
The CITY desires to contract with CONSULTANT to provide the professional services described in Section 2 of this Agreement, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants and promises of the parties herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on January 13, 2026 and expire on June 30, 2027.
A. Extension of Term. Upon mutual written agreement by the parties, the term of this Agreement may be extended for one additional period(s) of 1 year(s) each commencing upon the expiration of the initial or extended term, subject to the same terms and conditions of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall give written notice of its request for extension of the term of the Agreement to the CITY’s Authorized Representative, as identified in Section 4 below, at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the initial or extended term.
The extension(s) of the term of this Agreement shall be subject to a review of CONSULTANT’S performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and shall be subject to CITY approval. Such extension of time shall be in writing by a duly executed Amendment to this Agreement.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Subject to such policy direction and approvals provided by the CITY's Authorized Representative, CONSULTANT shall perform the services described in detail in Exhibit A, Scope of Services. CITY retains all rights of approval and discretion with respect to the projects and undertakings contemplated by this Agreement.
3. PAYMENT. The compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT including payment for professional services and reimbursable expenses, shall be at the rate and schedules in detail in Exhibit
10/2022 2
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
A. However, in no event shall the amount CITY pays CONSULTANT exceed Two Hundred Fifty Thousand, Seven Hundred Fifty dollars ($250,750.00) for the term of this Agreement. Any Amendment to this Agreement that includes an increase to this compensation amount shall be made in accordance with Section 5 below.
CONSULTANT may submit monthly statements for services rendered; all statements shall include adequate documentation demonstrating work performed during the billing period. It is intended that CITY review such statement and pay CONSULTANT for services rendered within forty-five (45) days of receipt of a statement that meets all requirements of this Agreement. Payment by CITY shall not be deemed a waiver of unsatisfactory work, even if such defects were known to the CITY at the time of payment.
4. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. Authorized representatives shall represent CITY and CONSULTANT in all matters pertaining to the services to be ordered by CITY or rendered by CONSULTANT under this Agreement except where approval for the CITY is specifically required by the City Council. The CITY’s authorized representative is Carlton Thompson, City Engineer of the Community & Economic Development Department. The CONSULTANT’s authorized representative is Christie Beeman, PE, Director.
5. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be amended in writing, subject to approval by both parties. If additional services are requested by CITY other than as described in the above Scope of Services, this Agreement may be amended, modified, or changed by the parties subject to mutual consent and in accordance with the CITY’s Municipal Code by execution of an Amendment by authorized representatives of both parties setting forth the additional scope of services to be performed, the performance time schedule, and the compensation for such services.
A. Amendment for Additional Compensation. CITY’s Authorized Representative is authorized to execute amendments to the Agreement on behalf of CITY, including amendments providing for additional compensation to CONSULTANT not to exceed the Minimum Threshold, including the base contract amount, throughout the term of this Agreement. “Minimum Threshold” means the dollar amount over which Council approval is required during each fiscal year as set forth in Concord City Council Resolution 21-43 pursuant to Concord Municipal Code Section
10/2022 3
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
3.10.040(a). The Minimum Threshold for Fiscal Year 2021-22 is $75,000 and increases by $5,000 each subsequent fiscal year such that by Fiscal Year 2026-27 the Minimum Threshold is $100,000. Any additional compensation to CONSULTANT that is greater than the Minimum Threshold, including the base contract amount, must be approved by City Council.
CONSULTANT’s failure to secure CITY’s written authorization for additional compensation or changes to the Scope of Services shall constitute a waiver of any and all right to adjustment in the price or time due, whether by way of compensation, restitution, quantum meruit, or similar relief.
6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Both parties understand and acknowledge that CONSULTANT, its officers, agents, employees, volunteers and subcontractors are and shall at all times remain as to the CITY wholly independent contractors. Neither the CITY nor any of its officers, officials, agents, employees or volunteers shall have any control over the manner by which the CONSULTANT performs this Agreement and shall only dictate the results of the performance.
CONSULTANT shall not represent that CONSULTANT or its officers, agents, employees, volunteers or subcontractors are agents or employees of the CITY, and CONSULTANT shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of the CITY in any capacity whatsoever as an agent, and shall have no authority, express or implied, to bind the CITY to any obligation whatsoever, unless otherwise provided in this Agreement.
As an independent contractor, CONSULTANT shall not be eligible for any benefits, which the City may provide to its employees and all persons, if any, hired by CONSULTANT shall be employees or subcontractors of CONSULTANT and shall not be construed as employees or agents of the CITY in any respect. CONSULTANT shall receive no premium or enhanced pay for work normally understood as overtime, i.e., hours that exceed forty (40) hours per work week, or work performed during non- standard business hours, such as in the evenings or on weekends. CONSULTANT shall not receive a premium or enhanced pay for work performed on a recognized holiday. CONSULTANT shall not receive paid time off for days not worked, whether it be in the form of sick leave, administrative leave, or for any other form of absence. CONSULTANT shall pay all taxes, assessments and premiums under the federal Social Security Act, any applicable unemployment insurance contributions, Workers Compensation insurance premiums, sales taxes, use taxes, personal property taxes, or other taxes or
10/2022 4
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
assessments now or hereafter in effect and payable by reason of or in connection with the services to be performed by CONSULTANT.
7. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT represents and warrants to CITY that CONSULTANT is skilled and able to provide such services described in the Scope of Services and that such services shall be performed in an expeditious manner, and with the degree of skill and care that is required by current, good, and sound procedures and practices. CONSULTANT further agrees that the services shall be in conformance with generally accepted professional standards prevailing at the time work is performed.
8. PERFORMANCE BY CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT shall not employ other consultants, subconsultants, experts, or contractors without the prior written approval of the CITY.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, CITY shall not be obligated or liable for payment hereunder to any party other than the CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT hereby designates the CONSULTANT’S representative as the person primarily responsible for the day-to-day performance of CONSULTANT'S work under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not change the CONSULTANT’S representative without the prior written consent of the CITY. Unless otherwise expressly agreed by the CITY, CONSULTANT'S representative shall remain responsible for the quality and timeliness of performance of the services, notwithstanding any permitted or approved delegation hereunder.
9. OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE OF DOCUMENTS. All documents furnished by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of CONSULTANT’s services in respect to this project. They are not intended nor are represented to be suitable for reuse by others except CITY on extensions of this project or on any other project. Any reuse without specific written verification and adoption by CONSULTANT for the specific purposes intended will be at user’s sole risk and without liability or legal exposure and expenses to CONSULTANT, including attorney’s fees arising out of such unauthorized reuse.
CONSULTANT’s records, documents, calculations, and all other instruments of service pertaining to actual project shall be given to CITY at the completion of the project. The CITY reserves the right to specify the file format that electronic document deliverables are presented to the CITY. [Alternative: Title to all plans, specifications, maps, estimates, reports, manuscripts, drawings,
10/2022 5
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
descriptions and other final work products compiled by the CONSULTANT under the Agreement shall be vested in the CITY, none of which shall be used in any manner whatsoever, by any person, firm, corporation, or agency without the expressed written consent of the CITY. Basic survey notes and sketches, charts, computations, and other data prepared or obtained under the Agreement shall be made available, upon request, to the CITY without restriction or limitations on their use. CONSULTANT may retain copies of the above-described information but agrees not to disclose or discuss any information gathered, discussed or generated in any way through this Agreement without the written permission of CITY during the term of this Agreement, unless required by law.]
10. INDEMNIFICATION.
A. For Design Professional Services Only. Pursuant to California Civil Code Section 2782.8, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify the CITY (including its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers) against liability for claims against the CITY that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. The CONSULTANT will reimburse the CITY for any expenditures, including reasonable attorney fees, incurred by the CITY in defending against claims ultimately determined to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the CONSULTANT.
B. For All Other Services. CONSULTANT agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the CITY (including its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers) from and against all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability (including all attorney’s fees and other litigation expenses) arising out of the CONSULTANT’s performance under the terms of this Agreement. This indemnification obligation on CONSULTANT’s part shall not apply to the demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the CITY.
11. INSURANCE. CONSULTANT agrees to have and maintain the policies set forth in Exhibit B entitled “INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. All policies, endorsements, certificates, and/or binders shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney as to form and content and shall be provided no later than thirty (30) calendar days following
10/2022 6
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
the execution of this Agreement by both parties. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver only if so approved in writing by the CITY. A lapse in any required insurance coverage during this Agreement shall be a breach of this Agreement. The insurance contemplated under this provision shall remain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement.
12. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The time of performance of the services under this Agreement is of the essence, and all time deadlines identified in this Agreement or Scope of Services shall be strictly construed.
13. SUSPENSION OF WORK. CITY may, at any time, by written notice, suspend further performance by CONSULTANT. All suspensions shall extend the time schedule for performance in a mutually satisfactory manner, and CONSULTANT shall be paid for services performed and reimbursable expenses incurred prior to the suspension date. During the period of suspension, CONSULTANT shall not receive any payment for services, or expenses, except for reasonable administration expenses, incurred by CONSULTANT by reason of such suspension.
14. TERMINATION. CITY may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon ten (10) days written notice to the other party. CITY may terminate the Agreement upon five (5) days written notice if CONSULTANT breaches this Agreement. In the event of any termination, CONSULTANT shall promptly deliver to the CITY any and all finished and unfinished reports or other written, recorded, photographic, or visual materials, documents, data, and other deliverables (“Work Materials”) prepared for the CITY prior to the effective date of such termination, all of which shall become CITY’s sole property. After receipt of the Work Materials, CITY will pay CONSULTANT for the services satisfactorily performed as of the effective date of the termination.
15. COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS. During the performance of this contract, CONSULTANT agrees as follows:
A. Equal Employment Opportunity. In connection with the execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of any protected class pursuant to California law. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, promotion, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or
10/2022 7
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rate of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training including apprenticeship.
B. Nondiscrimination Civil Rights Act of 1964. CONSULTANT will comply with all federal regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs.
C. Solicitations for Subcontractors including Procurement of Materials and Equipment. In all solicitation, either by competitive bidding or negotiations, made by CONSULTANT for work to be performed under a subcontract including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor, supplier or lessor shall be notified by CONSULTANT of CONSULTANT’S obligation under this Agreement and the regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the basis of any protected class pursuant to California law.
16. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
A. CONSULTANT covenants and represents that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has, or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of CITY or which would in any way hinder CONSULTANT’s performance of services under this Agreement. CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of the Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, official, agent, employee or subcontractor without the express written consent of the CITY. CONSULTANT agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest, or the appearance of any conflicts of interest, with the interests of the CITY in the performance of this Agreement.
B. CONSULTANT is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because CONSULTANT:
(1) Will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to its rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the CITY or of any CITY official, other than normal contract monitoring; and (2) Possesses no authority with respect to any CITY decision beyond the rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (2 Cal. Code Regs. § 18700(a)(2).)
17. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable Federal, State of California, and local laws, rules, and regulations and shall obtain all applicable
10/2022 8
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
licenses, including a business license with the City of Concord, and permits for the conduct of its business and the performance of the services.
18. CHOICE OF LAW. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, excluding any choice of law rules which may direct the application of the laws of another jurisdiction. In the event that suit shall be brought by either party hereunder, the parties agree that trial of such action shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Contra Costa, California.
19. NON-WAIVER. The waiver by either party of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained in the Agreement, or any default in their performance of any obligations under the Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach or default of the same or any other term, covenant, condition, or obligation, nor shall any waiver of any incident of breach of default constitute a continuing waiver of same.
20. ENFORCEABILITY; INTERPRETATION. In the event that any of the provisions or portions of application of any of the provisions of the Agreement are held to be illegal or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, CITY and CONSULTANT shall negotiate an equitable adjustment in the provisions of the Agreement with a view toward affecting the purpose of the Agreement. The illegality or invalidity of any of the provisions or portions of application of any of the provisions of the Agreement shall not affect the legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions or portions of application of any of the provisions of the Agreement. This Agreement shall be interpreted as though it was a product of a joint drafting effort and no provisions shall be interpreted against a party on the ground that said party was solely or primarily responsible for drafting the language to be interpreted.
21. INTEGRATION. All exhibits identified in this Agreement are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding between the parties as to the subject matter of this Agreement. It merges and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements, commitments, representation, writings, and discussions between CONSULTANT and CITY, whether oral or written.
//
//
10/2022 9
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
22. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES; NO JOINT VENTURE. CITY and CONSULTANT respectively, bind themselves, their successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the terms and obligations of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not assign or transfer any interest in the Agreement without the CITY's prior written consent, which consent shall be in the CITY’s sole discretion. Any attempted assignment or transfer in breach of this provision shall be void. This Agreement is not intended and shall not be construed to create any third party benefit. This Agreement is not intended and shall not be construed to create a joint venture or partnership between the parties. CONSULTANT, its officers, employees and agents shall not have any power to bind or commit the CITY to any decision.
23. FINANCIAL RECORDS. Records of CONSULTANT’s direct labor costs, payroll costs, and reimbursable expenses pertaining to this project covered by this Agreement will be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis and made available to CITY if and when required.
24. NOTICES. All notices required hereunder shall be in writing and mailed postage prepaid by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or by personal delivery to the CITY's address as shown below, or such other places as CITY or CONSULTANT may, from time to time, respectively, designate in a written notice given to the other. Notice shall be deemed received three (3) days after the date of the mailing thereof or upon personal delivery.
To CITY: Carlton Thompson,
City Engineer
Community & Economic Development Department
City of Concord
1950 Parkside Drive
Concord, CA 94519-2578
Phone: (925) 671-3182
Email: [email protected]
To CONSULTANT: Christie Beeman, PE,
Director
Environmental Science Associates (ESA)
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1050
Oakland, California94612
Phone: (510)839-5066
Email: [email protected]
25. NON-LIABILITY. No member of the CITY and no other officer, official, agent, employee or volunteer of the CITY shall be personally liable to CONSULTANT or otherwise in the