Cities Index.
Exhibit 1 - RFP 24-050SB Ranking Summary

Corona City Council
May 15, 2024

Document
Exhibit 1 - RFP 24-050SB Ranking Summary
Meeting
May 15, 2024
Body
Corona City Council
Original file
121 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on corona.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

84 88 87 90 78 90
Baker Electric Inc Bhelectric, Inc Big Sky Electric, Inc Center Electric Services, Inc McDonald Electric, Inc Western Construction
Specialists Inc
1 Completeness of Response (Pass/Fail) Max Points Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score 2 Work Plan/ Work Organization Max Points Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score 3 Qualifications of Company and Personnel (Experience) Max Points Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score 4 Approach to Safety Measures Max Points Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score 5 Reasonableness of Cost and Price Max Points Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score Raters Score 84 88 87 90 78 90
Summary
Responses to this RFP must be complete. Reponses that do not include the proposal content requirements identified within this RFP and subsequent addenda and do not address each of the items listed below will be considered incomplete, be rated a Fail in the Evaluation Criteria and will receive no further consideration.

Pass/Fail Pass Pass
Summary Evaluation Score Sheet RFP 24-050SB Utilities Department Electrical Installation and Maintenance Repair Services 20 21 21
23 23
22 25
25 This category is rated based on the submitter’s ability to illustrate a clear approach to safety measures:
a) Comply with OSHA and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 70E requirements and applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and orders
b) Provided Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP) c) No serious or willful OSHA violations within the past 5 years Category is rated based on the submitter’s:
a) Value provided
b) Reasonableness of hourly rates, labor hours, and fees to perform duties in scope of work c) Reasonableness based on costs for recently completed work of similar scope and size; consider travel time if applicable
d) Responsiveness to RFP and exceptions to or deviations from RFP requirements; quality of materials to be used; value of Total Price
The City reserves the right to negotiate with each contractor a Best and Final Offer. 25 Pass Pass
23 21
Pass Pass
Category is rated based on the submitter’s ability to clearly identify the following:
a) Strength and stability of the firm and any sub-contractors b) Data on the level of experience in specific contracts of this type, including performance and abilities (minimum 3 examples, in addition to listing a minimum of three (3) references c) Key personnel’s level of involvement in performing related work and/or close oversight d) Adequate labor commitment
e) Demonstrated knowledge of the scope of work, capability of performing specific tasks outlined in the RFP based on similar work experience
f) Samples of craftsmanship and quality of work for other similar projects 21 23 20 23
22 23 19 22
The proposal must clearly indicate that the submitter has performed adequate planning to accomplish the operation and maintenance tasks as defined in the work statement. a) Logical and laid out in a clear and thoughtful manner b) Includes a complete plan to accomplish the requirements, including sub-contracting c) Demonstrates that appropriate personnel and equipment will be positioned efficiently to fulfill requirements d) Innovative approach and ideas, specific methods and techniques utilized by contractor e) Considerate of time constraints within individual call-outs f) Meets all applicable guidelines as set forth in this RFP 25 21 22
19 21
22 23 20 24

← All documents from this meeting