Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Corona City Council
September 4, 2024

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
September 4, 2024
Body
Corona City Council
Pages
484
Original file
22.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-corona.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

5 CERTIFICATION
I, Sylvia Edwards, City Clerk of the City of Corona, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Corona, California, duly held the 4
th day of September, 2024, and thereafter at a
regular meeting held on the 18th day of September, 2024, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Corona, California, this 18th day of September, 2024. _____________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Corona, California
[SEAL]

Page 411 of 484 ends

6 SUMMARY
On September 18, 2024, the Corona City Council will consider adopting an ordinance to amend the Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan (SP98-01) to amend the General Residential Guidelines to establish architectural style standards that are intended to preserve the historic character of the downtown Corona residential neighborhoods as new residential structures are constructed on infill lots.

A certified copy of the full text of this proposed ordinance is posted in the City Clerk’s office.

The City Council meets at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Corona City Hall, located at 400 South Vicentia Avenue. The City Clerk’s office is located in City Hall near the Council Chambers.

Page 412 of 484 ends

7 EXHIBIT “A”

AMENDMENT TO SECTION E OF CHAPTER IV
OF THE

DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION SPECIFIC PLAN
(SEE ATTACHED FIFTEEN (15) PAGES)

Page 413 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-53
E – General Residential Guidelines

1. General Residential Rehabilitation Principles .................................................IV-53

2. Exterior Materials ..............................................................................................IV-54

3. Windows..............................................................................................................IV-54

4. Doors ...................................................................................................................IV-55

5. Porches and Stairs..............................................................................................IV-55

6. Ornamentation/Trim.........................................................................................IV-56

7. Roofs ....................................................................................................................IV-56

8. Additions to Existing Structures ......................................................................IV-57

9. New Infill Residential Structures ......................................................................IV-58

10. Accessory Buildings & Accessory Dwelling Units...........................................IV-59

11. Adaptive Reuse...................................................................................................IV-59

12. Multi-Family Residential ....................................................................................IV-59

13. Architectural Styles For New Residential………………………………………IV-61 The purpose of these guidelines is to help preserve and rehabilitate residential buildings and houses found within Downtown Corona neighborhoods in the RO, SF, R2, and MF districts. The guidelines are also intended to require new compatible residential development with existing development and to promote the conservation and reuse of existing residences.

In general, preservation and rehabilitation efforts shall aim toward protecting the essential architectural features of a residential building that help to identify its individual style and thereby further its contribution to the historic character of the area.

1. General Residential Rehabilitation Principles
a. The rehabilitation or repair of architectural details of historic residential buildings listed on the Corona Heritage Inventory and Corona Register shall comply with Corona’s Design Guidelines for Historic Buildings to retain and restore original elements. If damage or deterioration is too severe, the element should be recreated using original materials to match the design, color, texture and any other important design features. b. Rehabilitation of residential buildings not listed on the Corona Heritage Inventory shall incorporate architectural style that contributes to the traditional residential character of the area.

Page 414 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-54

2. Exterior Materials
a. Original exterior residential building materials shall be retained whenever possible. It is not desirable to use
mismatched materials of different sizes, shapes, textures, or finishes.
b. Residential buildings with original wood clapboard siding shall not be stuccoed in an attempt to "modernize" their appearance.
c. Brick surfaces shall not be sandblasted in an attempt to remove old paint. Sandblasting will damage the natural fired surface of the brick and cause it to lose its water-repellent qualities. Paint should be removed by chemical stripping.

3. Windows
a.. When window replacement is necessary,
the new window shall match the original
size, shape and style. Special milling may be
required.
b. An alternative to special milling may be the
use of an “off-the-shelf” standard window
that closely matches the original. While this
may compromise the true architectural
integrity of the building it may be an
economical alternative for areas of the building that are not visible from the public right-ofway. c.. Aluminum frame windows shall not be used as replacements on any part of a residential structure.
d. Exterior window frames of the structure, such as the lintel, sill, and casing shall consist of the same exterior building materials used on the building.

Page 415 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-55

4. Doors
a. The front door of the residence was the most ornate with secondary doors usually more utilitarian in appearance. The size, shape and style of doors is an important feature of all historical architectural styles and the original type/design should be used again.
b. If the original door is missing, select an appropriate design by studying the doors of similar residential structures in the neighborhood or consulting books on architectural
styles. Many older style panel doors are still available from material suppliers and may match original doors very
closely.

5. Porches And Stairs
a. During rehabilitation efforts, the design integrity of the front porch shall not be compromised. Architectural decoration, roof form, and materials on the front entrances and porches shall be typical of the style and period of the residential structure.

Page 416 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-56

5. Porches and Stairs (continued):
b. Stairs that require rehabilitation shall be
rebuilt according to the style of the building.

Off-the-shelf, ready-made wrought iron or
aluminum railings are prohibited.

6. Ornamentation/Trim
a. Most often it is the authentic decoration and
trim on a residential structure that lends
character and identifies the building with its
particular architectural style. Great care
should be taken in handling these materials
during renovation because many times they
are the very components that make a building
so special.

7. Roofs
a. Roofs are important both functionally and
aesthetically. Great care should be taken to
ensure that roofs are water-tight and that
roofing materials are compatible with the
original style of the residential structure.

Often times roofs only need minor repairs
but when replacement is necessary roofing
materials shall be appropriate to the
building's architectural style.
b. The determination of what material to use
for the replacement of wood shingles or
shakes on historic buildings is a hard decision.

The desire for the most aesthetic material is
often superseded by the desire to provide
maximum fire protection. In cases where
wood shingles or shakes are being replaced,
newer "architectural" styles of asphalt roofing
(e.g. thick butt composition) that closely
resemble wood shingles and provide fire
resistance shall be considered.
c. Metal roofs are prohibited.

Page 417 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-57

8. Additions to Existing Structures
a. Additions should be carefully placed to
minimize changes in the appearance of the
residence from the street (public right-ofway). Additions should be placed to the side or rear of the residence and should not
obstruct the original appearance of the
building from the street (public right-of-way).

If an addition is placed at the front of the
residential structure, the architectural
character of the addition shall be consistent
with the traditional character of the area and
have an integrated design with the existing
residential structure.
b. The roof of a residential structure, especially
its style, materials and pitch, is an important
architectural element that must be taken into
consideration when planning an addition.

The roof style, pitch and materials on the
addition shall match the original.
c. Adding an additional story to an existing
residential structure will always change the
building's proportions and shall be carefully
designed to follow similar two story
examples of that particular architectural
style found in the neighborhood.

Integrating the new second story addition
into the original design of the residence
may be easier if the addition is setback or
"stepped" back from the front facade so
that it is less noticeable from the street
(public right-of-way).

Page 418 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-58

9. New Infill Residential Structures
The single most important issue of new infill residential development is one of compatibility, especially when considering larger residences. When new residential structures are developed adjacent to older single family residences, there are concerns that the height and scale of the infill structures may have a negative impact on the adjacent smaller scale buildings. The following considerations are intended to address this concern:
a. New infill residential structures shall adhere to the architectural style provided in Section IV.E.13.
b. New residential development shall continue the functional, on-site relationships of the surrounding neighborhood. For example, common patterns that should be continued in Corona are front porches and entries facing the street and garages/parking located at the rear of the parcel.
c. Garages in front are prohibited.
d. Front yard setbacks for new residential infill development shall match existing setback patterns of surrounding dwellings.
e. New infill residential structures shall incorporate the traditional architectural characteristics of existing residences found in the Downtown Corona residential neighborhood, for example: window and door spacing, exterior materials, roof style and pitch, finished-floor height, porches and decoration/detail. f. The proper use of building materials can enhance desired neighborhood qualities such as compatibility, continuity, harmony, etc. The design of infill residential structures shall incorporate an appropriate mixture of the predominant materials found in the neighborhood. Common materials are brick, stone, wood, horizontal clapboard siding and shingles.
g. New infill residential structures taller than
one story can impose on smaller adjacent
residences. The height of new residential
structures shall consider the context of
surrounding residential structures. New
residential structures with a taller height
should consider setbacks or "stepping back"
the second story by at least five feet to reduce
impacts on adjacent existing single story
residences.

Page 419 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-59
h. The incorporation of traditional balconies, verandas and porches within the building form is strongly encouraged.
i. Color schemes for infill residential structures shall consider the color schemes of existing residences in the surrounding neighborhood in order to maintain compatibility and harmony. Avoid sharp color contrasts with existing building colors.

10. Accessory Buildings and Accessory Dwelling Units
New accessory buildings (garages, sheds) and accessory dwelling units (living quarters) that are visible from the public right-of-way shall incorporate the distinctive architectural features (e.g. materials, color, roof pitch, etc.) of the main residence. Accessory dwelling units are also subject to the regulations in Corona Municipal Code Chapter 17.85.

11. Adaptive Reuse
The term “adaptive reuse” applies to both nonhistoric and historic houses and residential structures which were originally designed as
residences and which are being converted (or
adapted) to a new use. Adaptive reuse is an issue in
the RO-Residential Office, R-Residential, and MFMulti-family Districts in Downtown Corona.

Adaptive reuse presents a number of special problems because the needs of the new use (such as increased parking, air conditioning, new entrances and exits, handicapped access, added floor area, etc.) are often substantially different from the old use and yet must be accommodated within the same house.
a. The overriding principle of design for adaptive reuse is to be consistent with the significant design of the existing house or residential structure.
b. On-site parking and driveways should be located to be unobtrusive to the historical appearance of a building from the street. Parking should be located in the back, with access from the street or an alley, if one exists. Driveways should not be “flared” at the street to provide parking in front of the home or in the front yard.

12. Multi-Family Residential
The purpose of the Multi-Family Residential Design Guidelines is to maintain neighborhood compatibility with other low-density neighborhoods. Multiple family housing tend to generate large parking areas, taller structures and an overall decrease in private open space. If not properly

Page 420 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-60
designed, these residential developments can decrease the quality of life of the established residential neighborhoods. The guidelines that follow are intended to help mitigate the negative effects of these developments and to provide a pleasant residential environment within the context of higher density. Multi-family residential in residential neighborhoods shall adhere to the architectural style provided in Section IV.E.13.
a. Multi-Family Site Design
1) Site setbacks of new units from public streets should continue the prevailing setback pattern unless a different setback standard is required.
2) New multi-family development should respect the site settings of existing properties in the immediate area thorough the use of similar setbacks, building arrangements, buffer yards and avoidance of overwhelming building scale and visual obstructions such as privacy walls, carports and garages.
3) New multi-family development shall incorporate representative characteristics of the architecture used in the Downtown Corona residential neighborhood, and a positive, distinctive site layout and/or established functional pattern. 4) New landscaping shall compliment existing landscape materials, location and massing on adjacent established developments where appropriate.
b. Building Placement
1) Clustering of multi-family units should be a consistent site planning element. Buildings composed of a series of simple yet varied plans assure compatibility and variety in overall building form.
2) Buildings should be oriented to maximize southern exposure to large window areas to encourage passive solar heating in the winter months.
3) Buildings should be oriented in such a way as to create courtyards and open space areas, thus increasing the aesthetic appeal of the area.
4) Building orientation should provide a series of public spaces for recreation and general open space.
c. Parking and Circulation
1) There should be no more than six (6) spaces of uninterrupted parking on open surface parking areas. Each of the six (6) spaces shall be separated from additional spaces by a landscaped bulb of a minimum width of four (4) feet or diamond planter. 2) Divide large parking lots. Large parking areas should be divided into a series of connected smaller lots which are laid out in an efficient, straightforward manner.

Page 421 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-61
3) Provide access from side streets, whenever possible., 4) Use special accents at entries. Monumentation, special textured paving, flowering accents, walls, shrubs, and the use of specimen trees shall be used to generate visual interest at entry points.
5) Screen parking lots. Utilize a 36 inch high hedge with rolling berm or 42 inch high wall to screen parking at the street periphery. (Minimum shrub container size should be five (5) gallon.)
6) Carports, detached garages, and accessory structures shall be designed as an integral part of the architecture of the project. These structures shall be similar in materials, color, and detail to the principal buildings of the development. Prefabricated metal carports are prohibited.
7) Parking courts should be treated as “landscape plazas” with attention to landscape surfaces, softened edges, shade and articulated pedestrian/vehicular circulation. 8) The parking area shall be designed in a manner which links it to the building and street sidewalk system as an extension of the pedestrian environment. This can be accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and/or landscaping treatment.
d. Miscellaneous
1) Architectural screening shall be constructed of the same materials and finishes that are compatible with the building, and shall be designed and placed to compliment the building design.
2) Storage areas shall be completely screened from ground level using appropriate materials such as solid shrub massing or walls.
3) Trash bins shall be located within a trash enclosure. The enclosure shall be finished using materials compatible with the surrounding architecture, and shall be softened with landscaping. Gates shall be solid metal painted to match adjacent buildings. Recommended enclosure locations include inside parking courts, or at the end of parking bays. Location of the enclosure should be conveniently accessible for trash truck access. 4) Where common mailbox services are provided, they should be located close to the project entry near recreational facilities. The architectural character should be similar in form, materials, and color to the surrounding buildings. Mailbox locations must be approved by the U.S. Postal Service.

13. Architectural Styles For New Residential
Throughout the Downtown Corona residential neighborhoods, pre-1950 residential structures are common. Common architectural styles for historic residential structures include Victorian,

Page 422 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-62
Mission and Spanish Revival, Colonial, Tudor, Bungalow and Craftsman Bungalow, and Ranch. To preserve the historic character of the Downtown Corona residential neighborhoods, the following are acceptable architectural styles that are to be used for new residential construction.

These architectural styles are to be used with the General Residential Design Guidelines. a. Architectural Styles for Downtown Corona Residential Neighborhoods The following architectural styles and materials shall be used for new residential construction in residential neighborhoods and for residential rehabilitation projects that will extensively change the appearance of the existing residential structure. Architectural styles that are not listed in this section but contribute to Corona’s heritage and the Downtown residential neighborhood may be permitted by the Planning and Development Director.

Bungalow & Craftsman Common Materials Common Architectural Features
Wood
Wood Shingles (side wall)
Wood Clapboard
Fieldstone
River Rock
Brick
Concrete
• Low pitch gable or
hipped roof
• Gable dormer
• Multiple roof planes
• Wide eave overhang
• Roof wall braces
• Extended rafter tails
• Square or
rectangular form
• Horizontal clapboard
siding
• Band casement or
double-hung
windows
• Expansive open
porch
• Square or round
columns and
balustrades
• Windows: mullion,
muntin, sash
• Flat roof shingles
(Class A roofing
required)

Page 423 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-63
Mission and Spanish Revival Common Materials Common Architectural Features
Mission Style
Spanish Revival
Stucco
Plaster
Terra Cota Tile
Red Clay tile
Wrought Iron
Brick
Mission
• Mission dormer or
roof parapet (can be
combined with low
pitch roof)
• Red clay barrel tile
roof covering (Class
A roofing required)
• Overhanging eaves
• Smooth stucco or
plaster finish
• Quatrefoil windows
on mission dormer
or roof parapet
• Casement windows
• Recessed entry over
front door
Spanish Revival
• Low pitch roof
• Cylindrical turrets
• Terra cotta tile or
red clay barrel tile
roof covering (Class
A roofing required)
• Smooth stucco walls
• Casement windows
• Decorative iron
work
• Arched openings
• Recessed entry over
front door
• Patio

Page 424 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-64
Tudor Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Stucco
Brick
Stone
Wood
• Steeply pitched roof;
side gable
• Cross gables
• Decorative halftimbering on wall
surface
• Tall, narrow windows;
multiple styles
• Rounded arched
doorway
• Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)

Page 425 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-65
Colonial Revival Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Wood
Wood Clapboard
Brick
Plaster
• Gable roof or side
gable roof
• Symmetrical window
placement
• Symmetrical façade
with door in center
• Pediment over
entrance
• Portico supported by
columns
• Covered front porch
• Horizontal wood siding
• Double hung window,
can include muntin
• Window lintel and sill
• Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)

Page 426 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-66
Victorian Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Wood
Wood Shingle
Wood Clapboard
Wood Shiplap
Brick
Stone
• Steeply pitched gable
roof
• Decorative shingles
within pitch area of
roof
• Turrets can be included
in roof plane
• Use of varying wall
textures between
floors
• Dentil molding
underneath cornice
• Horizontal wood siding
• Irregular, asymmetrical
massing
• Covered front porch
with decorative
brackets underneath
roof
• Patio railing
• Rectangular shaped
windows; double hung
sashes
• Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)

Page 427 of 484 ends

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan IV-67
Ranch Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Wood
Wood Shingle
Wood Clapboard
Stone
Brick
• Low pitch gable roof
(can include dormers)
• Cornice return
underneath roof pitch
• Wainscot or different
wall textures along
façade
• Horizontal wood siding
• Wide front porch with
columns
• Rectangular windows
• Window side shutters
• Window lintel and sill
• Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)

Page 428 of 484 ends

E – General Residential Guidelines

1. General Residential Rehabilitation Principles .................................................IV-52

2. Exterior Materials ..........................................................................................IV-54##

3. Windows..........................................................................................................IV-54##

4. Doors ...............................................................................................................IV-55##

5. Porches and Stairs..........................................................................................IV-55##

6. Ornamentation/Trim.....................................................................................IV-56##

7. Roofs ................................................................................................................IV-56##

8. Additions to Existing Structures ..................................................................IV-57##

9. New Infill Residential Structures ..................................................................IV-58##

10. Accessory Buildings & Accessory Dwelling Units.......................................IV-59##

11. Secondary Residential Units .........................................................................IV-59## 112. Adaptive Reuse...............................................................................................IV-59## 123. Multi-Family Residential ................................................................................IV-60##

13. Architectural Styles For New Residential…………………………………..IV-## The purpose of these guidelines is to help preserve and rehabilitate residential buildings and houses found within Downtown Corona neighborhoods in the RO, SF, R2, and MF districts. The guidelines are also intended to encourage require new compatible residential development with existing development and to promote the conservation and reuse of existing residences.

In general, preservation and rehabilitation efforts shallould aim toward protecting the essential architectural features of a residential building that help to identify its individual style and thereby further its contribution to the historic character of the area.

1. General Residential Rehabilitation Principles
a. The Rrehabilitation or repair of architectural details of historic residential buildings listed on the Corona Heritage Inventory and Corona Register should try shall comply with Corona’s Design Guidelines for Historic Buildings to retain and restore original elements.

If damage or deterioration is too severe, the element should be recreated using original materials to match the design, color, texture and any other important design features. b. Rehabilitation of residential buildings not listed on the Corona Heritage Inventory shall incorporate architectural style that contributes to the traditional residential character of the area. When replacement is necessary and original materials cannot be obtained, substitution materials should incorporate the design, color and texture that conveys the traditional visual appearance of the original material.

Page 429 of 484 ends

2. Exterior Materials
a. Original exterior residential building materials shallould be retained whenever possible. It is not desirable to use
mismatched materials of different sizes, shapes, textures, or finishes.
b. Residential buildings with original wood clapboard siding shallould not be stuccoed in an attempt to "modernize" their appearance.
c. Brick surfaces shallould not be sandblasted in an attempt to remove old paint. Sandblasting will damage the natural fired surface of the brick and cause it to lose its water-repellent qualities. Paint should be removed by chemical stripping.

3. Windows
a. Historically, most older residential
structures had wood framed windows that
were either fixed, double hung, or
casement. The size, shape and style of
windows are important architectural
features and the original type window
should be used again.
a.b. When window replacement is necessary, it
is preferred that the new window shall be
an exact match of the original size, shape
and style., which may require sSpecial milling may be required. bc. An alternative to special milling may be the use of an “off-the-shelf” standard window that closely matches the original. While this may compromise the true architectural integrity of the building it may be an economical alternative for areas of the building that are not visible from the public right-of-way.
c.d. It is strongly recommended that aAluminum frame windows shall not be used as replacements on any part of a residential structure.
d. Exterior window frames of the structure, such as the lintel, sill, and casing shall consist of the same exterior building materials used on the building.

Page 430 of 484 ends

4. Doors
a. Historically, residential structures had solid wood doors that fit the particular style of the building. The front door of the residence was the most ornate with secondary doors usually more utilitarian in appearance. The size, shape and style of doors is an important feature of all historical
architectural styles and the original type/design should be used again.
b. If the original door is missing, select an appropriate design by studying the doors of similar residential structures in the neighborhood or consulting books on architectural
styles. Many older style panel doors are still available from material suppliers and may match original doors very
closely.

5. Porches And Stairs
a. During rehabilitation efforts, the design integrity of the front porch shallould not be compromised. Architectural decoration, roof form, and materials on the front entrances and porches shall be typical of the style and period of the residential structure. There is often a desire to "modernize" or change the appearance of the building by changing the details of the original porch design, usually through the installation of wrought iron or aluminum railings. Temptations to change these items should be strongly avoided, as any change in the structural or decorative elements of the front porch will usually compromise the original architectural integrity of the entire building.

Page 431 of 484 ends

5. Porches and Stairs (continued):
b. The stairs leading to the front porch are an
integral part of the overall style of the
building. When Sstairs that require
rehabilitation, they should shall be rebuilt
according to the style of the building. Avoid
the use of oOff-the-shelf, ready-made
wrought iron or aluminum railings are
prohibited.

6. Ornamentation/Trim
a. Most often it is the authentic decoration and trim on a residential structure that lends character and identifies the building with its particular architectural style. Great care should be taken in handling these materials during renovation because many times they are the very components that make a building so special.

7. Roofs
a. Roofs are important both functionally and
aesthetically. Great care should be taken to
ensure that roofs are water-tight and that
roofing materials are compatible with the
original style of the residential structure.

Often times roofs only need minor repairs but
when replacement is necessary roofing
materials shallould be selected that are
appropriate to the building's architectural
style.
b. The determination of what material to use for
the replacement of wood shingles or shakes on
historic buildings is a hard decision. The desire for
the most aesthetic material is often superseded by
the desire to provide maximum fire protection.

Many of the In cases where wood shingles or
shakes are being replaced, newer "architectural"
styles of asphalt roofing (e.g. thick butt
composition) that closely resemble wood shingles
and provide good fire resistance shall be
considered.

Page 432 of 484 ends

c. Metal roofs are prohibited.

Page 433 of 484 ends

8. Additions to Existing Structures
a. Additions to historically significant residential
structures may be necessary to ensure their
continued use. Modifications (e.g. additions,
seismic strengthening, new entrances and
exits) should be made with care so as not to
compromise a residential building's
historically valuable features, materials, or
finishes.
ab. Additions should be carefully placed to
minimize changes in the appearance of the
residence from the street (public right-ofway). It is strongly recommended that aAdditions should be placed to the side or
rear of the residence and should not obstruct the original the appearance of the building from the street (public right-of-way). If an
addition is placed at the front of the
residential structure, the architectural
character of the addition shall be consistent
with the traditional character of the area and
have an integrated design with the existing
residential structure.
b. The roof of a residential structure, especially
its style, materials and pitch, is an important
architectural element that must be taken into
consideration when planning an addition. The
roof style, pitch and materials on the addition shallould match the original. cd. Adding an additional story to an existing
residential structure will always change the
building's proportions and shallould be
carefully designed to follow similar two
story examples of that particular
architectural style found in the
neighborhood. Integrating the new second
story addition into the original design of
the residence may be easier if the addition
is setback or "stepped" back from the front
facade so that it is less noticeable from the
street (public right-of-way).

Page 434 of 484 ends

9. New Infill Residential Structures
The single most important issue of new infill residential development is one of compatibility, especially when considering larger residences. When new residential structures are developed adjacent to older single family residences, there are concerns that the height and bulk scale of the infill residences structures may have a negative impact on the adjacent smaller scale buildings.

The following considerations are intended to address this concern:
a. New infill residential structures shall adhere to the architectural style provided in Section IV.E.13.
ba. New residential development shallould continue the functional, on-site relationships of the surrounding neighborhood. For example, common patterns that should be continued in Corona are front porches and entries facing the street and garages/parking located at the rear of the parcel (see below).
cb. Garages in front are prohibited.
dc. Front yard setbacks for new residential infill development shallould match existing setback patterns of surrounding dwellings.
ed. New infill residential structures shallould incorporate the traditional architectural characteristics of existing residences found in the Downtown Corona residential surrounding neighborhood, for example: window and door spacing, exterior materials, roof style and pitch, finished-floor height, porches and decoration/detail. fe. The proper use of building materials can enhance desired neighborhood qualities such as compatibility, continuity, harmony, etc. The design of infill residential structures shallould incorporate an appropriate mixture of the predominant materials found in the neighborhood. Common materials are brick, stone, wood, horizontal clapboard siding and shingles.
gf. Because nNew infill residential structures are
potentially likely to be taller than one story,
their height and bulk can impose on smaller
adjacent residences. The height of new
residential structures shallould be considered
within the context of surrounding residential
structures. New residential structures with a
greater taller height should consider setbacks
or "stepping back" at the second story by at least five feet to reduce impacts on adjacent existing single story residences.
hg. The incorporation of traditional balconies, verandas and porches within the building form is strongly encouraged.

Page 435 of 484 ends

9. New Infill Residential Structures (continued):
ih. Color schemes for infill residential structures shallould consider the color schemes of existing residences in the surrounding neighborhood in order to maintain compatibility and harmony. Avoid sharp color contrasts with existing building colors.

10. Accessory Buildings and Accessory Dwelling Units
New accessory buildings (garages, sheds) and accessory dwelling units, second units) (living quarters) that are visible from the public right-of-way shallould incorporate the distinctive architectural features (e.g. materials, color, roof pitch, etc.) of the main residence. Accessory dwelling units are also subject to the regulations in
Corona Municipal Code Chapter 17.85. Design
features should be applied with less detail on the
accessory residence so that it does not compete
with the main building and is clearly subordinate to
it.

11. Secondary Residential Units
a. The entrance to an accessory dwelling should
be clearly defined and recognizable as a person
enters the rear yard. A ground-level patio or porch should be placed at the bottom of the stairs ascending to the dwelling. The patio or porch should be at least 50 square feet with at least six (6) feet clear in any directions. A trellis or roof should form a canopy over at least a portion of this space.
b. At the top of the stairs and at the entry to the unit, the landing my be extended to form a deck or balcony. The doorway to the dwelling should be accompanied by an overhang that is at least three (3) feet deep to provide protection from the rain. c. The location and direction of windows should minimize the loss of privacy to adjacent residences. Windows within 10 feet of an interior property line or primary dwelling (regardless of orientation) should use clerestory windows with a sill height of at least five (5) feet.
112.Adaptive Reuse
The term “adaptive reuse” applies to both non-historic and historic houses and residential structures which were originally designed as residences and which are being converted (or

Page 436 of 484 ends

adapted) to a new use. Adaptive reuse is an issue in the RO-Residential Office, R-Residential, and MF- Multi-family Districts in Downtown Corona.

Adaptive reuse presents a number of special problems because the needs of the new use (such as increased parking, air conditioning, new entrances and exits, handicapped access, added floor area, etc.) are often substantially different from the old use and yet must be accommodated within the same house.
a. The overriding principle of design for adaptive reuse is to be consistent with the significant design of the existing house or residential structure.
b. On-site parking and driveways should be located to be unobtrusive to the historical appearance of a building from the street. Parking should be located in the back, with access from the street or an alley, if one exists. Driveways should not be “flared” at the street to provide parking in front of the home or in the front yard. 123.Multi-Family Residential
The purpose of the Multi-Family Residential Design Guidelines is to maintain neighborhood compatibility with other low-density neighborhoods. Multiple family housing, because their higher densities, tend to generate large parking areas, bulkier taller structures and an overall decrease in private open space. If not properly designed, these residential developments can decrease the quality of life of the established residential neighborhoods. The guidelines that follow are intended to help mitigate the negative effects of these developments and to provide a pleasant residential environment within the context of higher density. Multi-family residential in residential neighborhoods shall adhere to the architectural style provided in Section IV.E.13. a. Multi-Family Site Design
1) Site setbacks of new units from public streets should continue the prevailing setback pattern unless a different setback standard is required.
2) New multi-family development should respect the site settings of existing properties in the immediate area thorough the use of similar setbacks, building arrangements, buffer yards and avoidance of overwhelming building scale and visual obstructions such as privacy walls, carports and garages.
3) New multi-family development shallould incorporate representative characteristics of the surrounding architecture used in the Downtown Corona residential neighborhood, and a positive, distinctive site layout and/or established functional pattern. 4) New landscaping shallould compliment existing landscape materials, location and massing on adjacent established developments where appropriate. b. Building Placement

Page 437 of 484 ends

1) Clustering of multi-family units should be a consistent site planning element. Buildings composed of a series of simple yet varied plans assure compatibility and variety in overall building form.
2) Buildings should be oriented in random positions to avoid instances where living spaces of one structure face the living spaces of another and significantly reduce indoor privacy. 32) Buildings should be oriented to maximize southern exposure to large window areas to encourage passive solar heating in the winter months.
43) Buildings should be oriented in such a way as to create courtyards and open space areas, thus increasing the aesthetic appeal of the area.
54) Building orientation should provide a series of public spaces for recreation and general open space.
c. Parking and Circulation
1) There should be no more that than six (6) spaces of uninterrupted parking, whether in garages, carports, or on open surface parking areas. Each of the six (6) spaces shall be separated from additional spaces by a landscaped bulb of a minimum width of four (4) feet or diamond planter.
2) Divide large parking lots. Large parking areas should be divided into a series of connected smaller lots which are laid out in an efficient, straightforward manner. 3) Provide access from side streets, . Wwhenever possible., locate access drives on side streets. When this is not possible, design the main site entry with patterned concrete or pavers to differentiate it from the public sidewalk.
4) Locate driveways away from street intersections. Access drives, whether located on front or side streets, should be located as far as possible from street intersections so that adequate automobile stacking space is provided.
54) Use special accents at entries. Monumentation, special textured paving, flowering accents, walls, shrubs, and the use of specimen trees shall be used to generate visual interest at entry points.
65) Screen parking lots. Utilize a 36 inch high hedge with rolling berm or 42 inch high wall to screen parking at the street periphery. (Minimum shrub container size should be five (5) gallon.)
76) Carports, detached garages, and accessory structures shallould be designed as an integral part of the architecture of the projects. These structures shallould be similar in materials, color, and detail to the principal buildings of the development. Prefabricated metal carports are prohibited.

Page 438 of 484 ends

87) Parking courts should be treated as “landscape plazas” with attention to landscape surfaces, softened edges, shade and articulated pedestrian/vehicular circulation. 98) The parking area shall be designed in a manner which links it to the building and street sidewalk system as an extension of the pedestrian environment. This can be accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and/or landscaping treatment.
d. Miscellaneous
1) Architectural screening shall be constructed of the same materials and finishes that are compatible with the adjacent building, and shall be designed and placed to compliment the building design.
2) Storage areas shall be completely screened from ground level view using appropriate materials such as solid shrub massing or wood walls.
3) Trash bins shall be located within a trash enclosure. The enclosure shall be finished using materials compatible with the surrounding architecture, and shall be softened with landscaping.

Gates shall be solid metal painted to match adjacent buildings. Recommended enclosure locations include inside parking courts, or at the end of parking bays. Location of the enclosure should be conveniently accessible for trash truck access.
4) Where common mailbox services are provided, they should be located close to the project entry near recreational facilities. The architectural character should be similar in form, materials, and color to the surrounding buildings. Mailbox locations must be approved by the U.S. Postal Service.

13. Architectural Styles For New Residential
Throughout the Downtown Corona residential neighborhoods, pre-1950 residential structures are common. Common architectural styles for historic residential structures include Victorian, Mission and Spanish Revival, Colonial, Tudor, Bungalow and Craftsman Bungalow, and Ranch. To preserve the historic character of the Downtown Corona residential neighborhoods, the following are acceptable architectural styles that are to be used for new residential construction.

These architectural styles are to be used with the General Residential Design Guidelines. a. Architectural Styles for Downtown Corona Residential Neighborhoods The following architectural styles and materials shall be used for new residential construction in residential neighborhoods and for residential rehabilitation projects that will extensively change the appearance of the existing residential structure. Architectural styles that are not listed in this

Page 439 of 484 ends

section but contribute to Corona’s heritage and the Downtown residential neighborhood may be permitted by the Planning and Development Director.

Bungalow & Craftsman Common Materials Common Architectural Features
Wood
Wood Shingles (side wall)
Wood Clapboard
Fieldstone
River Rock
Brick
Concrete
• Low pitch gable or
hipped roof
• Gable dormer
• Multiple roof planes
• Wide eave overhang
• Roof wall braces
• Extended rafter tails
• Square or
rectangular form
• Horizontal clapboard
siding
• Band casement or
double-hung
windows
• Expansive open
porch
• Square or round
columns and
balustrades
• Windows: mullion,
muntin, sash
• Flat roof shingles
(Class A roofing
required)

Page 440 of 484 ends

Mission and Spanish Revival Common Materials Common Architectural Features
Mission Style
Spanish Revival
Stucco
Plaster
Terra Cota Tile
Red Clay tile
Wrought Iron
Brick
Mission
• Mission dormer or
roof parapet (can be
combined with low
pitch roof)
• Red clay barrel tile
roof covering (Class
A roofing required)
• Overhanging eaves
• Smooth stucco or
plaster finish
• Quatrefoil windows
on mission dormer
or roof parapet
• Casement windows
• Recessed entry over
front door
Spanish Revival
• Low pitch roof
• Cylindrical turrets
• Terra cotta tile or
red clay barrel tile
roof covering (Class
A roofing required)
• Smooth stucco walls
• Casement windows
• Decorative iron
work
• Arched openings
• Recessed entry over
front door
• Patio
Tudor Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Stucco
Brick
Stone
Wood
• Steeply pitched roof;
side gable
• Cross gables
• Decorative halftimbering on wall
surface

Page 441 of 484 ends

Tudor Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
• Tall, narrow windows;
multiple styles
• Rounded arched
doorway
• Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)
Colonial Revival Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Wood
Wood Clapboard
Brick
Plaster
• Gable roof or side
gable roof
• Symmetrical window
placement
• Symmetrical façade
with door in center
• Pediment over
entrance
• Portico supported by
columns
• Covered front porch
• Horizontal wood siding
• Double hung window,
can include muntin
• Window lintel and sill

Page 442 of 484 ends

• Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)
Victorian Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Wood
Wood Shingle
Wood Clapboard
Wood Shiplap
Brick
Stone
• Steeply pitched gable
roof
• Decorative shingles
within pitch area of
roof
• Turrets can be included
in roof plane
• Use of varying wall
textures between
floors
• Dentil molding
underneath cornice
• Horizontal wood siding
• Irregular, asymmetrical
massing
• Covered front porch
with decorative
brackets underneath
roof
• Patio railing

Page 443 of 484 ends

• Rectangular shaped
windows; double hung
sashes
• Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)
Ranch Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Wood
Wood Shingle
Wood Clapboard
Stone
Brick
• Low pitch gable roof
(can include dormers)
• Cornice return
underneath roof pitch
• Wainscot or different
wall textures along
façade
• Horizontal wood siding
• Wide front porch with
columns
• Rectangular windows
• Window side shutters
• Window lintel and sill
• Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)

Page 444 of 484 ends

City of Corona
Staff Report
400 S. Vicentia Ave.

Corona, CA 92882
File #: 24-0606

PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT
DATE: 08/12/2024
TO: Honorable Chair and Commissioners
FROM: Planning & Development Department
APPLICATION REQUEST:

SPA2024-0001: Specific Plan Amendment to the Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan amending the general residential guidelines. (Applicant: City of Corona) RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the Planning and Housing Commission recommend APPROVAL of SPA2024-0001 to the City Council, based on the findings contained in the staff report.

BACKGROUND
The Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan (SP98-01) covers approximately 621 acres located in the city’s historic downtown, which includes properties located within and on the outside periphery of Grand Boulevard, and along Sixth Street between Lincoln Avenue and the Flood Control Channel.

The specific plan governs the land use, development standards, and design guidelines for the affected properties.

The specific plan includes an inventory of residential properties. Most of the residential properties were developed before the 1950s with several residential structures placed on the city’s Corona Register as local historic landmarks. The residential neighborhoods within the specific plan are well established and represent the age of when the structures were built. Vacant infill lots exist within the downtown Corona residential neighborhoods and the residential design guidelines established in the specific plan are intended to guide the development of new residential structures to be compatible with the existing residential neighborhoods.

The residential design guidelines are expressed as mandatory requirements or non-mandatory requirements in the specific plan. Over the years, new residential structures on vacant infill properties or the rehabilitation of existing residential structures have shown modern-day designs that are not compatible with the architectural elements already established in the existing neighborhoods.

Since the downtown Corona residential neighborhoods include a high volume of historical structures, City of Corona Page 1 of 5 Printed on 8/6/2024

Page 445 of 484 ends

File #: 24-0606
Since the downtown Corona residential neighborhoods include a high volume of historical structures, which contributes to the character and era of the neighborhoods, the downtown residential guidelines are being amended to provide more mandatory requirements and new architectural style standards to preserve the architectural history and appearance of the neighborhoods. The amended residential design guidelines are intended for new residential structures to be compatible with existing residential structures and the existing atmosphere of the neighborhood.

The new architectural style standards being added to the specific plan were presented to the City Council at its study session on March 20, 2024. The architectural style standards were presented in a combined presentation on the proposed revisions to the city’s Historic Resources Ordinance in Chapter 17.63 of the Corona Municipal Code (CMC). The City Council supported the addition of the architectural style standards into the Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan and the proposed amendments to Chapter 17.63 of the CMC regarding updates to the Historic Resources ordinance and the creation of a Historic Preservation Board. The amendments to CMC Chapter 17.63 are being processed separately as a zone text amendment to Title 17, Zoning Code, of the CMC and later than SPA2024-0001. CMC Chapter 17.63 focuses on the preservation of existing historical resources and the process of listing historical structures on the city’s heritage inventory and local register as a local historic landmark. It does not focus on the design guidelines for new residential structures, which is the reason SPA2024-0001 is separate from the future amendment associated with CMC Chapter

17.63. PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
SPA2024-0001 will amend Section E, General Residential Guidelines, of Chapter IV of the Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan. The redline changes to Section E are provided in its entirety in Exhibit 1.

The existing residential guidelines include rehabilitation requirements for existing residential structures in addition to acceptable exterior materials, window designs, porches and stairs, and roof design and material. The guidelines also describe building additions to existing structures and how the appearance of the addition should have the same architectural elements and design as the existing structure.

The guidelines also include requirements for new infill residential structures to incorporate traditional architectural characteristics of existing residential structures found in the neighborhood. Examples include window and door spacing, exterior materials, roof style and pitches, porches, garage placement, and decoration detail. No specific architectural style is required in the downtown Corona neighborhood, and this has resulted in the architectural style of new residential structures being subjectively scrutinized.

Most of the amendment proposed by SPA2024-0001 includes the addition of residential architectural style standards that are allowed for new residential construction and for residential rehabilitation projects that will extensively change the appearance of the existing residential structure. The architectural style standards are described in Section E.13 of Exhibit 1, which include Mission and Spanish Revival, Colonial, Tudor, Bungalow and Craftsman Bungalow, and Ranch. The specific plan also allows the Planning and Development Director to consider an architectural style not listed in the specific plan if it demonstrates a contribution to Corona’s heritage and the downtown residential neighborhood. The architectural style standards are intended to preserve the historic character of the City of Corona Page 2 of 5 Printed on 8/6/2024

Page 446 of 484 ends

File #: 24-0606
neighborhood. The architectural style standards are intended to preserve the historic character of the downtown Corona residential neighborhoods as new residential structures are constructed on infill lots.

DEPARTMENTAL, AGENCY AND PUBLIC COMMENTS
According to Government Code Section 65352.3(a)(2), the city notified the California Native American Tribes inviting consultation on the proposed amendment to the specific plan. The consultation period started on March 20, 2024, and closed on June 20, 2024 at the end of the 90 day period. No tribes requested consultation with the city on the proposed amendment.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The proposed amendment involves text revisions to the Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan amending the general residential guidelines and will have no significant effect on the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project is a city application and no application fees are associated with the request.

PUBLIC NOTICE
A 10-day public notice was advertised in the Sentinel Weekly News and posted at the project site.

STAFF ANALYSIS:

SPA2024-0001 is consistent with the purpose of the Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan because the amended residential design guidelines will preserve and enhance the residential neighborhoods by requiring new residential construction to have architectural elements that reflect the historical character and environment of the existing neighborhood. This allows the city’s heritage to be preserved while also accommodating new development.

FINDINGS OF APPROVAL FOR SPA2024-0001

1. Per Section 15061(b)(3) of the State Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Notice of Exemption has been prepared for the project because Section 15061(b)(3) states that a project is exempted from CEQA if the activity is covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The proposed amendment involves text revisions to the Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan amending the general residential guidelines and will have no significant effect on the environment.

2. Pursuant to CMC Section 17.53.090(B)(1)(a) the plan systematically implements and is City of Corona Page 3 of 5 Printed on 8/6/2024

Page 447 of 484 ends

File #: 24-0606

2. Pursuant to CMC Section 17.53.090(B)(1)(a) the plan systematically implements and is consistent with the General Plan for the following reasons:
a. SPA2024-0001 is consistent with Goal LU-8 because it establishes residential guidelines to assure the integrity, quality, and livability of Corona’s existing residential neighborhoods, preserving those elements that give them character, cohesion, and quality of life.
b. SPA2024-0001 is consistent with Policy LU-8.7 because the residential guidelines require new single family homes constructed in existing neighborhoods to be designed to complement existing structures within property setbacks, scale, building materials, and color palette, and exhibit a high quality of architectural design. c. SPA2024-0001 is consistent with Policy LU-17.14 because the residential guidelines promote the development of more cohesive and uniform patterns of housing types and densities in the Downtown, avoiding the hodge-podge appearance that currently exists on some streets.

3. Pursuant to CMC Section 17.53.090(B)(1)(b) the Plan provides for the development of a comprehensively planned project that is superior to development otherwise allowed under the conventional zoning classifications for the following reason:
a. SPA2024-0001 amends the general residential guidelines which are intended to preserve the historic character of the downtown Corona residential neighborhoods.

4. Pursuant to CMC Section 17.53.090(B)(1)(c) the Plan provides for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities and public services required by the long-term needs of the project and/or other area residents, and complements the orderly development of the City beyond the project's boundaries for the following reasons:
a. SPA2024-0001 amends the general residential guidelines for single family and multifamily properties in the downtown Corona residential neighborhoods by requiring new residential construction or the rehabilitation of an existing residential structure that will extensively change the appearance of the structure to use building forms and materials that are consistent with the scale, building setbacks, and building materials of existing residential structures in the neighborhood.
b. The downtown Corona residential neighborhoods pre-date the 1950s and contain existing residential structures and infill vacant properties that are supported by existing infrastructure, such as utilities, and improved city streets.

5. Pursuant to CMC Section 17.53.090(B)(1)(d), the Plan provides for the appropriate orientation and relationship between land uses within and adjacent to the project for the following reason:
a. SPA2024-0001 affects the general residential guidelines and applies to properties zoned single family and multifamily residential according to the land use plan adopted in the Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan.

City of Corona Page 4 of 5 Printed on 8/6/2024

Page 448 of 484 ends

File #: 24-0606

6. In addition to the findings made in reference to CMC Section 17.53.090, the following additional findings are made in reference to the amendments to SP98-01 (Downtown Revitalization) per Section VIII(9):
a. SPA2024-0001 is consistent with the City’s General Plan because:
i. SPA2024-0001 is consistent with Goal LU-8 because it establishes residential guidelines to assure the integrity, quality, and livability of Corona’s existing residential neighborhoods, preserving those elements that give them character, cohesion, and quality of life.
ii. SPA2024-0001 is consistent with Policy LU-8.7 because the residential guidelines require new single family homes constructed in existing neighborhoods to be designed to complement existing structures within property setbacks, scale, building materials, and color palette, and exhibit a high quality of architectural design.
iii. SPA2024-0001 is consistent with Policy LU-17.14 because the residential guidelines promote the development of more cohesive and uniform patterns of housing types and densities in the Downtown, avoiding the hodge-podge appearance that currently exists on some streets.
b. SPA2024-0001 is consistent with the goals, policies and planning concepts of the Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan because it preserves the city’s heritage while accommodating new development.

PREPARED BY: JOANNE COLETTA, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

EXHIBITS

1. Proposed Amendment

2. Environmental Documentation
City of Corona Page 5 of 5 Printed on 8/6/2024

Page 449 of 484 ends

E – General Residential Guidelines

1. General Residential Rehabilitation Principles ................................................. IV-52

2. Exterior Materials .......................................................................................... IV-54##

3. Windows .......................................................................................................... IV-54##

4. Doors ............................................................................................................... IV-55##

5. Porches and Stairs .......................................................................................... IV-55##

6. Ornamentation/Trim ..................................................................................... IV-56##

7. Roofs ................................................................................................................ IV-56##

8. Additions to Existing Structures................................................................... IV-57##

9. New Infill Residential Structures .................................................................. IV-58##

10. Accessory Buildings & Accessory Dwelling Units ....................................... IV-59##

11. Secondary Residential Units ......................................................................... IV-59## 112. Adaptive Reuse ............................................................................................... IV-59## 123. Multi-Family Residential ................................................................................ IV-60##

13. Architectural Style For New Residential…………………………………..IV-## The purpose of these guidelines is to help preserve and rehabilitate residential buildings and houses found within Downtown Corona neighborhoods in the RO, SF, R2, and MF districts. The guidelines are also intended to encourage require new compatible residential development with existing development and to promote the conservation and reuse of existing residences.

In general, preservation and rehabilitation efforts shallould aim toward protecting the essential architectural features of a residential building that help to identify its individual style and thereby further its contribution to the historic character of the area.

1. General Residential Rehabilitation Principles
a. The Rrehabilitation or repair of architectural details of historic residential buildings listed on the Corona Heritage Inventory and Corona Register should try shall comply with Corona’s Design Guidelines for Historic Buildings to retain and restore original elements.

If damage or deterioration is too severe, the element should be recreated using original materials to match the design, color, texture and any other important design features. b. Rehabilitation of residential buildings not listed on the Corona Heritage Inventory shall incorporate architectural style that contributes to the traditional residential character of the area. When replacement is necessary and original materials cannot be obtained, substitution materials should incorporate the design, color and texture that conveys the traditional visual appearance of the original material.

Page 450 of 484 ends

2. Exterior Materials
a. Original exterior residential building materials shallould be retained whenever possible. It is not desirable to use
mismatched materials of different sizes, shapes, textures, or finishes.
b. Residential buildings with original wood clapboard siding shallould not be stuccoed in an attempt to "modernize" their appearance.
c. Brick surfaces shallould not be sandblasted in an attempt to remove old paint. Sandblasting will damage the natural fired surface of the brick and cause it to lose its water-repellent qualities. Paint should be removed by chemical stripping.

3. Windows
a. Historically, most older residential
structures had wood framed windows that
were either fixed, double hung, or
casement. The size, shape and style of
windows are important architectural
features and the original type window
should be used again.
a.b. When window replacement is necessary, it
is preferred that the new window shall be
an exact match of the original size, shape
and style., which may require sSpecial milling may be required. bc. An alternative to special milling may be the use of an “off-the-shelf” standard window that closely matches the original. While this may compromise the true architectural integrity of the building it may be an economical alternative for areas of the building that are not visible from the public right-of-way.
c.d. It is strongly recommended that aAluminum frame windows shall not be used as replacements on any part of a residential structure.
d. Exterior window frames of the structure, such as the lintel, sill, and casing shall consist of the same exterior building materials used on the building.

Page 451 of 484 ends

4. Doors
a. Historically, residential structures had solid wood doors that fit the particular style of the building. The front door of the residence was the most ornate with secondary doors usually more utilitarian in appearance. The size, shape and style of doors is an important feature of all historical
architectural styles and the original type/design should be used again.
b. If the original door is missing, select an appropriate design by studying the doors of similar residential structures in the neighborhood or consulting books on architectural
styles. Many older style panel doors are still available from material suppliers and may match original doors very
closely.

5. Porches And Stairs
a. During rehabilitation efforts, the design integrity of the front porch shallould not be compromised. Architectural decoration, roof form, and materials on the front entrances and porches shall be typical of the style and period of the residential structure. There is often a desire to "modernize" or change the appearance of the building by changing the details of the original porch design, usually through the installation of wrought iron or aluminum railings. Temptations to change these items should be strongly avoided, as any change in the structural or decorative elements of the front porch will usually compromise the original architectural integrity of the entire building.

Page 452 of 484 ends

5. Porches and Stairs (continued):
b. The stairs leading to the front porch are an
integral part of the overall style of the
building. When Sstairs that require
rehabilitation, they should shall be rebuilt
according to the style of the building. Avoid
the use of oOff-the-shelf, ready-made
wrought iron or aluminum railings are
prohibited.

6. Ornamentation/Trim
a. Most often it is the authentic decoration and trim on a residential structure that lends character and identifies the building with its particular architectural style. Great care should be taken in handling these materials during renovation because many times they are the very components that make a building so special.

7. Roofs
a. Roofs are important both functionally and
aesthetically. Great care should be taken to
ensure that roofs are water-tight and that
roofing materials are compatible with the
original style of the residential structure.

Often times roofs only need minor repairs but
when replacement is necessary roofing
materials shallould be selected that are
appropriate to the building's architectural
style.
b. The determination of what material to use for
the replacement of wood shingles or shakes on
historic buildings is a hard decision. The desire for
the most aesthetic material is often superseded by
the desire to provide maximum fire protection.

Many of the In cases where wood shingles or
shakes are being replaced, newer "architectural"
styles of asphalt roofing (e.g. thick butt
composition) that closely resemble wood shingles
and provide good fire resistance shall be
considered.

Page 453 of 484 ends

c. Metal roofs are prohibited.

Page 454 of 484 ends

8. Additions to Existing Structures
a. Additions to historically significant residential
structures may be necessary to ensure their
continued use. Modifications (e.g. additions,
seismic strengthening, new entrances and
exits) should be made with care so as not to
compromise a residential building's
historically valuable features, materials, or
finishes.
ab. Additions should be carefully placed to
minimize changes in the appearance of the
residence from the street (public right-ofway). It is strongly recommended that aAdditions should be placed to the side or
rear of the residence and should not obstruct the original the appearance of the building from the street (public right-of-way). If an
addition is placed at the front of the
residential structure, the architectural
character of the addition shall be consistent
with the traditional character of the area and
have an integrated design with the existing
residential structure.
b. The roof of a residential structure, especially
its style, materials and pitch, is an important
architectural element that must be taken into
consideration when planning an addition. The
roof style, pitch and materials on the addition shallould match the original. cd. Adding an additional story to an existing
residential structure will always change the
building's proportions and shallould be
carefully designed to follow similar two
story examples of that particular
architectural style found in the
neighborhood. Integrating the new second
story addition into the original design of
the residence may be easier if the addition
is setback or "stepped" back from the front
facade so that it is less noticeable from the
street (public right-of-way).

Page 455 of 484 ends

9. New Infill Residential Structures
The single most important issue of new infill residential development is one of compatibility, especially when considering larger residences. When new residential structures are developed adjacent to older single family residences, there are concerns that the height and bulk scale of the infill residences structures may have a negative impact on the adjacent smaller scale buildings.

The following considerations are intended to address this concern:
a. New infill residential structures shall adhere to the architectural style provided in Section IV.E.13.
ba. New residential development shallould continue the functional, on-site relationships of the surrounding neighborhood. For example, common patterns that should be continued in Corona are front porches and entries facing the street and garages/parking located at the rear of the parcel (see below).
cb. Garages in front are prohibited.
dc. Front yard setbacks for new residential infill development shallould match existing setback patterns of surrounding dwellings.
ed. New infill residential structures shallould incorporate the traditional architectural characteristics of existing residences found in the Downtown Corona residential surrounding neighborhood, for example: window and door spacing, exterior materials, roof style and pitch, finished-floor height, porches and decoration/detail. fe. The proper use of building materials can enhance desired neighborhood qualities such as compatibility, continuity, harmony, etc. The design of infill residential structures shallould incorporate an appropriate mixture of the predominant materials found in the neighborhood. Common materials are brick, stone, wood, horizontal clapboard siding and shingles.
gf. Because nNew infill residential structures are
potentially likely to be taller than one story,
their height and bulk can impose on smaller
adjacent residences. The height of new
residential structures shallould be considered
within the context of surrounding residential
structures. New residential structures with a
greater taller height should consider setbacks
or "stepping back" at the second story by at least five feet to reduce impacts on adjacent existing single story residences.
hg. The incorporation of traditional balconies, verandas and porches within the building form is strongly encouraged.

Page 456 of 484 ends

9. New Infill Residential Structures (continued):
ih. Color schemes for infill residential structures shallould consider the color schemes of existing residences in the surrounding neighborhood in order to maintain compatibility and harmony. Avoid sharp color contrasts with existing building colors.

10. Accessory Buildings and Accessory Dwelling Units
New accessory buildings (garages, sheds) and accessory dwelling units, second units) (living quarters) that are visible from the public right-of-way shallould incorporate the distinctive architectural features (e.g. materials, color, roof pitch, etc.) of the main residence. Accessory dwelling units are also subject to the regulations in
Corona Municipal Code Chapter 17.85. Design
features should be applied with less detail on the
accessory residence so that it does not compete
with the main building and is clearly subordinate to
it.

11. Secondary Residential Units
a. The entrance to an accessory dwelling should
be clearly defined and recognizable as a person
enters the rear yard. A ground-level patio or porch should be placed at the bottom of the stairs ascending to the dwelling. The patio or porch should be at least 50 square feet with at least six (6) feet clear in any directions. A trellis or roof should form a canopy over at least a portion of this space.
b. At the top of the stairs and at the entry to the unit, the landing my be extended to form a deck or balcony. The doorway to the dwelling should be accompanied by an overhang that is at least three (3) feet deep to provide protection from the rain. c. The location and direction of windows should minimize the loss of privacy to adjacent residences. Windows within 10 feet of an interior property line or primary dwelling (regardless of orientation) should use clerestory windows with a sill height of at least five (5) feet.
112. Adaptive Reuse
The term “adaptive reuse” applies to both non-historic and historic houses and residential structures which were originally designed as residences and which are being converted (or

Page 457 of 484 ends

adapted) to a new use. Adaptive reuse is an issue in the RO-Residential Office, R-Residential, and MF- Multi-family Districts in Downtown Corona.

Adaptive reuse presents a number of special problems because the needs of the new use (such as increased parking, air conditioning, new entrances and exits, handicapped access, added floor area, etc.) are often substantially different from the old use and yet must be accommodated within the same house.
a. The overriding principle of design for adaptive reuse is to be consistent with the significant design of the existing house or residential structure.
b. On-site parking and driveways should be located to be unobtrusive to the historical appearance of a building from the street. Parking should be located in the back, with access from the street or an alley, if one exists. Driveways should not be “flared” at the street to provide parking in front of the home or in the front yard. 123. Multi-Family Residential
The purpose of the Multi-Family Residential Design Guidelines is to maintain neighborhood compatibility with other low-density neighborhoods. Multiple family housing, because their higher densities, tend to generate large parking areas, bulkier taller structures and an overall decrease in private open space. If not properly designed, these residential developments can decrease the quality of life of the established residential neighborhoods. The guidelines that follow are intended to help mitigate the negative effects of these developments and to provide a pleasant residential environment within the context of higher density. Multi-family residential in residential neighborhoods shall adhere to the architectural style provided in Section IV.E.13. a. Multi-Family Site Design
1) Site setbacks of new units from public streets should continue the prevailing setback pattern unless a different setback standard is required.
2) New multi-family development should respect the site settings of existing properties in the immediate area thorough the use of similar setbacks, building arrangements, buffer yards and avoidance of overwhelming building scale and visual obstructions such as privacy walls, carports and garages.
3) New multi-family development shallould incorporate representative characteristics of the surrounding architecture used in the Downtown Corona residential neighborhood, and a positive, distinctive site layout and/or established functional pattern. 4) New landscaping shallould compliment existing landscape materials, location and massing on adjacent established developments where appropriate. b. Building Placement

Page 458 of 484 ends

1) Clustering of multi-family units should be a consistent site planning element. Buildings composed of a series of simple yet varied plans assure compatibility and variety in overall building form.
2) Buildings should be oriented in random positions to avoid instances where living spaces of one structure face the living spaces of another and significantly reduce indoor privacy. 32) Buildings should be oriented to maximize southern exposure to large window areas to encourage passive solar heating in the winter months.
43) Buildings should be oriented in such a way as to create courtyards and open space areas, thus increasing the aesthetic appeal of the area.
54) Building orientation should provide a series of public spaces for recreation and general open space.
c. Parking and Circulation
1) There should be no more that than six (6) spaces of uninterrupted parking, whether in garages, carports, or on open surface parking areas. Each of the six (6) spaces shall be separated from additional spaces by a landscaped bulb of a minimum width of four (4) feet or diamond planter.
2) Divide large parking lots. Large parking areas should be divided into a series of connected smaller lots which are laid out in an efficient, straightforward manner. 3) Provide access from side streets, . Wwhenever possible., locate access drives on side streets. When this is not possible, design the main site entry with patterned concrete or pavers to differentiate it from the public sidewalk.
4) Locate driveways away from street intersections. Access drives, whether located on front or side streets, should be located as far as possible from street intersections so that adequate automobile stacking space is provided.
54) Use special accents at entries. Monumentation, special textured paving, flowering accents, walls, shrubs, and the use of specimen trees shall be used to generate visual interest at entry points.
65) Screen parking lots. Utilize a 36 inch high hedge with rolling berm or 42 inch high wall to screen parking at the street periphery. (Minimum shrub container size should be five (5) gallon.)
76) Carports, detached garages, and accessory structures shallould be designed as an integral part of the architecture of the projects. These structures shallould be similar in materials, color, and detail to the principal buildings of the development. Prefabricated metal carports are prohibited.

Page 459 of 484 ends

87) Parking courts should be treated as “landscape plazas” with attention to landscape surfaces, softened edges, shade and articulated pedestrian/vehicular circulation. 98) The parking area shall be designed in a manner which links it to the building and street sidewalk system as an extension of the pedestrian environment. This can be accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and/or landscaping treatment.
d. Miscellaneous
1) Architectural screening shall be constructed of the same materials and finishes that are compatible with the adjacent building, and shall be designed and placed to compliment the building design.
2) Storage areas shall be completely screened from ground level view using appropriate materials such as solid shrub massing or wood walls.
3) Trash bins shall be located within a trash enclosure. The enclosure shall be finished using materials compatible with the surrounding architecture, and shall be softened with landscaping.

Gates shall be solid metal painted to match adjacent buildings. Recommended enclosure locations include inside parking courts, or at the end of parking bays. Location of the enclosure should be conveniently accessible for trash truck access.
4) Where common mailbox services are provided, they should be located close to the project entry near recreational facilities. The architectural character should be similar in form, materials, and color to the surrounding buildings. Mailbox locations must be approved by the U.S. Postal Service.

13. Architectural Style For New Residential
Throughout the Downtown Corona residential neighborhoods, pre-1950 residential structures are common. Common architectural styles for historic residential structures include Victorian, Mission and Spanish Revival, Colonial, Tudor, Bungalow and Craftsman Bungalow, and Ranch. To preserve the historic character of the Downtown Corona residential neighborhoods, the following are acceptable architectural styles that are to be used for new residential construction.

These architectural styles are to be used with the General Residential Design Guidelines. a. Architectural Styles for Downtown Corona Residential Neighborhoods The following architectural styles and materials shall be used for new residential construction in residential neighborhoods and for residential rehabilitation projects that will extensively change the appearance of the existing residential structure. Architectural styles that are not listed in this

Page 460 of 484 ends

section but contribute to Corona’s heritage and the Downtown residential neighborhood may be permitted by the Planning and Development Director.

Bungalow & Craftsman Common Materials Common Architectural Features
Wood
Wood Shingles (side wall)
Wood Clapboard
Fieldstone
River Rock
Brick
Concrete
 Low pitch gable or
hipped roof
 Gable dormer
 Multiple roof planes
 Wide eave overhang
 Roof wall braces
 Extended rafter tails
 Square or
rectangular form
 Horizontal clapboard
siding
 Band casement or
double-hung
windows
 Expansive open
porch
 Square or round
columns and
balustrades
 Windows: mullion,
muntin, sash
 Flat roof shingles
(Class A roofing
required)

Page 461 of 484 ends

Mission and Spanish Revival Common Materials Common Architectural Features
Mission Style
Spanish Revival
Stucco
Plaster
Terra Cota Tile
Red Clay tile
Wrought Iron
Brick
Mission
 Mission dormer or
roof parapet (can be
combined with low
pitch roof)
 Red clay barrel tile
roof covering (Class
A roofing required)
 Overhanging eaves
 Smooth stucco or
plaster finish
 Quatrefoil windows
on mission dormer
or roof parapet
 Casement windows
 Recessed entry over
front door
Spanish Revival
 Low pitch roof
 Cylindrical turrets
 Terra cotta tile or
red clay barrel tile
roof covering (Class
A roofing required)
 Smooth stucco walls
 Casement windows
 Decorative iron
work
 Arched openings
 Recessed entry over
front door
 Patio
Tudor Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Stucco
Brick
Stone
Wood
 Steeply pitched roof;
side gable
 Cross gables
 Decorative halftimbering on wall
surface

Page 462 of 484 ends

Tudor Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
 Tall, narrow windows;
multiple styles
 Rounded arched
doorway
 Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)
Colonial Revival Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Wood
Wood Clapboard
Brick
Plaster
 Gable roof or side
gable roof
 Symmetrical window
placement
 Symmetrical façade
with door in center
 Pediment over
entrance
 Portico supported by
columns
 Covered front porch
 Horizontal wood siding
 Double hung window,
can include muntin
 Window lintel and sill

Page 463 of 484 ends

 Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)
Victorian Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Wood
Wood Shingle
Wood Clapboard
Wood Shiplap
Brick
Stone
 Steeply pitched gable
roof
 Decorative shingles
within pitch area of
roof
 Turrets can be included
in roof plane
 Use of varying wall
textures between
floors
 Dentil molding
underneath cornice
 Horizontal wood siding
 Irregular, asymmetrical
massing
 Covered front porch
with decorative
brackets underneath
roof
 Patio railing

Page 464 of 484 ends

 Rectangular shaped
windows; double hung
sashes
 Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)
Ranch Common Materials Common Architectural
Features
Wood
Wood Shingle
Wood Clapboard
Stone
Brick
 Low pitch gable roof
(can include dormers)
 Cornice return
underneath roof pitch
 Wainscot or different
wall textures along
façade
 Horizontal wood siding
 Wide front porch with
columns
 Rectangular windows
 Window side shutters
 Window lintel and sill
 Flat roof shingle (Class
A roofing required)

Page 465 of 484 ends

Notice of Exemption FORM “A”

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
TO:
☒ Office of Planning and Research
P. O. Box 3044, Room 113
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
(Sent via [email protected])
FROM:
(Public
Agency)
Name: City of Corona, Planning &
Development Department
Address: 400 S. Vicentia Ave., Suite
120, Corona, CA 92882
Telephone: 951-736-2434
☒ Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
or
County Clerk (Include County name)
Address: 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA
92501

1. Project Title: SPA2024-0001

2. Project Applicant: City of Corona

3. Project Location – Identify street address and cross streets or attach a map showing project site
(preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 1/2’ topographical map
identified by quadrangle name):

Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan is generally
located within and on the outside periphery of Grand
Boulevard located in the City of Corona.

4. (a) Project Location – City: Corona (b) Project Location – County: Riverside

5. Description of nature, purpose, and beneficiaries of Project:

Amendment to the Downtown Revitalization Specific
Plan amending the general residential design guidelines.

6. Name of Public Agency approving project: City of Corona

7. Name of Person or Agency undertaking the project,
including any person undertaking an activity that
receives financial assistance from the Public Agency
as part of the activity or the person receiving a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement of use from the Public Agency as part of the activity:

City of Corona

8. Exempt status: (check one)
(a) ☐ Ministerial project. (Pub. Resources Code § 21080(b)(1); State CEQA Guidelines § 15268)
(b) ☐ Not a project.
(c) ☐ Emergency Project. (Pub. Resources Code § 21080(b)(4); State CEQA Guidelines § 15269(b),(c))
(d) ☐ Categorical Exemption.

State type and section number:

Page 466 of 484 ends

Notice of Exemption FORM “A”
(e) ☐ Declared Emergency. (Pub. Resources Code § 21080(b)(3); State CEQA Guidelines § 15269(a))
(f) ☐ Statutory Exemption.

State Code section number:
(g) ☒ Other. Explanation: (Public Resources Code § 21080 (a); State CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3))

9. Reason why project was exempt: This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from
CEQA if the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The proposed amendment involves text revisions to the
Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan amending the
general residential guidelines and will have no significant effect on the environment.

10. Lead Agency Contact Person:

Telephone:

Joanne Coletta, Director
951-736-2434

11. If filed by applicant: Attach Preliminary Exemption Assessment (Form “A”) before filing.

12. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes ☒ No ☐

13. Was a public hearing held by the Lead Agency to consider the exemption? Yes ☒ No ☐ If yes, the date of the public hearing was: Click to enter date ________________________________
Signature Date: Click to enter date
Joanne Coletta
Name Title: Planning and Development Director
☒ Signed by Lead Agency ☐ Signed by Applicant
Date Received for Filing: Click to enter date
(Clerk Stamp Here)
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code.

Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code.

Page 467 of 484 ends

Monday, August 12, 2024
City of Corona
400 S. Vicentia Ave.

Corona, CA 92882
Council Chambers - 6:00 p.m.

Chair Matt Woody
Vice Chair Marie Vernon
Commissioner Karen Alexander
Commissioner Sarah Longwell
Commissioner Craig Siqueland
Planning and Housing Commission Minutes - Draft

Page 468 of 484 ends

Planning and Housing Commission Minutes - Draft August 12, 2024

ROLLCALL
Chair Matt Woody, Vice Chair Marie Vernon, Commissioner Karen Alexander, and Commissioner Craig Siqueland
Present 4 -
Absent 1 - Commissioner Sarah Longwell

CALL TO ORDER
Chair Woody called the meeting to order.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chair Woody led the Pledge of Allegiance.

COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None.

MEETING MINUTES
Approval of minutes for the Planning and Housing Commission meeting of July 8, 2024.

1. A motion was made by Commissioner Alexander, seconded by Commissioner Siqueland, that these Minutes be approved, with a noted correction by Commissioner Alexander. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: 4 - Chair Woody, Vice Chair Vernon, Commissioner Alexander, and Commissioner Siqueland

Absent: 1 - Commissioner Longwell

CONSENT ITEMS
GPCD2024-0009: Request for a General Plan Consistency Determination regarding the acquisition of 0.06 acres of property located at 425 Corona Mall. (Applicant: Ashley Zaragoza, City of Corona Economic Development Department)

2. The Consent Item was not pulled for discussion by Commission.

The Commission inquired on details of the Downtown property acquisition project led by the Economic Development Department; and staff provided clarification.

A motion was made by Commissioner Siqueland, seconded by Vice Chair Vernon, that the Planning and Housing Commission adopt Resolution No. 2645 determining that the acquisition of 0.06 acres of property located at 425 Corona Mall is in conformance with the City's General Plan. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: 4 - Chair Woody, Vice Chair Vernon, Commissioner Alexander, and Commissioner Siqueland

Absent: 1 - Commissioner Longwell
City of Corona Page 1 Printed on 8/20/2024

Page 469 of 484 ends

Planning and Housing Commission Minutes - Draft August 12, 2024

PUBLIC HEARINGS
PP2023-0007 (CONTINUED): Precise Plan application for the review of the site plan, architecture, landscaping and other features associated with the development of a 1,900-square-foot restaurant with drive-through services, gas station with seven double-sided fuel pumps, and 3,750-square-foot convenience store on 1.40 acres located on the north side of 2nd Street, approximately 450 feet west of Buena Vista Avenue. (Applicant: Greens Development)

3. Sandra Vanian, Planning Manager, informed the Commission that the applicant for PP2023-0007 is in the process of revising their application. She mentioned that the item will tentatively be re-noticed for the month of September 2024.

Joe Morgan, resident, provided comments on this continued item.

A motion was made by Commissioner Alexander, seconded by Commissioner Siqueland, that the Planning and Housing Commission CONTINUE PP2023-0007 off calendar. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: 4 - Chair Woody, Vice Chair Vernon, Commissioner Alexander, and Commissioner Siqueland

Absent: 1 - Commissioner Longwell
SPA2024-0001: Specific Plan Amendment to the Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan amending the general residential guidelines. (Applicant: City of Corona)

4. Joanne Coletta, Director of Planning and Development Department, reviewed the staff report and exhibits for SPA2024-0001.

The Commission inquired on various details of this item and on a related future zone text amendment; and Ms. Coletta provided clarification.

Chair Woody opened the public hearing.

Joe Morgan, resident, expressed support and had a question regarding a prohibited roof material.

Chair Woody closed the public hearing.

Ms. Coletta addressed Mr. Morgan's question and other questions from the Commission. Commissioner Alexander expressed appreciation for the consistency that this amendment will provide to the area.

A motion was made by Vice Chair Vernon, seconded by Commissioner Alexander, that the Planning and Housing Commission recommend APPROVAL of SPA2024-0001 to the City Council, based on the findings contained in the staff report. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: 4 - Chair Woody, Vice Chair Vernon, Commissioner Alexander, and Commissioner Siqueland City of Corona Page 2 Printed on 8/20/2024

Page 470 of 484 ends

Planning and Housing Commission Minutes - Draft August 12, 2024

Absent: 1 - Commissioner Longwell

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
Ms. Coletta shared an update regarding the applications that the Planning Commission recommended for approval to the City Council on July 8. She noted the Commissioner's hard work in reviewing these items that all passed at the City Council meeting of August 7.

PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS AND

COMMENTS
Chair Woody requested additional information on the five agenda items scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting of August 26, 2024.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Future agenda items are scheduled for the Planning and Housing Commission meeting of August 26, 2024.

ADJOURNMENT
Chair Woody adjourned the meeting at 6:37 p.m. to the Planning and Housing Commission meeting of Monday, August 26, 2024, commencing at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers.

City of Corona Page 3 Printed on 8/20/2024

Page 471 of 484 ends

DATE: 09/04/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: City Manager’s Department
2024-21

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

REQUEST BY COUNCIL MEMBER DADDARIO TO USE THE CITY LOGO FOR

SPONSORSHIP OF A SCHOOL FUNDRAISER
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report seeks Council permission for Council Member Daddario to use the City logo alongside his name on a banner as part of a school sponsorship fundraiser.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council approve Council Member Daddario’s request to use the City logo for a school sponsorship fundraiser.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

The Corona Municipal Code (CMC) 1.04.170 City Seal-Unlawful Uses states the following:
“It shall be unlawful for any person to make or use the seal of the city, either in its current or prior forms as described in Section 1.04.160 above, or any cut, facsimile or reproduction of the seal, or to make or use any seal or any design which is an imitation of the seal, or of the design thereof, of which may be mistaken for the seal of the city, or the design thereof, for any purpose other than for city purposes without the express consent of the City Council,”

Page 472 of 484 ends

Therefore, use of the City seal, and by extension the City logo, requires Council permission.

ANALYSIS:

The City’s logo is a symbol of official municipal representation. Its use is usually restricted to official City documents, communications, and events. However, the Council may grant permission for its use in other contexts where the logo's utilization would be deemed appropriate and beneficial to the City's public image.

As part of the ‘Dads All-In” program fundraiser at a local school, Council Member Daddario desires to participate in a banner sponsorship campaign to support the group’s initiative. The “Dads All-In” program serves as a platform for dads and/or father figures to get involved in the lives and education of their children. The program positively impacts the lives of children and helps build strong bonds.

Council Member Daddario’s sponsorship includes a banner recognition effort. The banner will feature the sponsors' names alongside the logo of the professional organization they represent. So, Councilmember Daddario wishes to have the City’s logo displayed.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this recommended action ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This action seeks the permission of Council to use the City’s logo on a banner, and there is no possibility that approving the recommended action will have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no environmental analysis is required.

PREPARED BY: AMINAH MEARS, DPA, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER REVIEWED BY: BRETT CHANNING, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Future Agenda Item Request

Page 473 of 484 ends

Future Agenda Item Request Form
Future agenda items should be limited to new issues that emerge during the year that are urgent and cannot wait until the next priority-setting session of the Council before requiring action.

Name: Tony Daddario
Date: August 26, 2024
Title Name/Topic: Use of City Logo
Background

1. What is the purpose for the request i.e. what you are trying to achieve or do? I’d like to get permission from the City Council (as required by the Municipal Code) to use the City Logo for my sponsorship of a school fundraiser I’m doing at my son’s school.

2. What is the scope of the work you wish to see done?
Just permission.

3. Does this request align with the City’s Strategic Plan? How? n/a

4. What is the desired timeline to have the issue considered by Council? Meeting of September 4, 2024

5. Is the issue urgent requiring action before the next priority setting session of Council (Spring Workshop)?
Yes.

Staff Section (To be completed by staff)
Approximate Staff Time Required: N/A
Approximate Cost: $ No Cost

Page 474 of 484 ends

DATE: 09/04/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: City Manager’s Office
2024-17

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

TRAVEL REQUEST FOR COUNCIL MEMBER WES SPEAKE TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND EXPO.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the City Council to consider approving the advance travel request for Council Member Wes Speake to attend the 2024 League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council approve the advance request for Council Member Wes Speake to attend the 2024 League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The estimated total cost for the trip is $964.27, which includes registration, meals, and transportation.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

The League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo will feature speakers, timely presentations on key topics for local leaders, and numerous opportunities for peer-to-peer sharing with other California city officials. The Expo will have opportunities to engage with organizations providing city services. Importantly, Cal Cities convenes a memberdriven General Assembly and Resolutions process yearly at the conference. This is a unique opportunity to engage all members on significant policy issues to protect local control.

Page 475 of 484 ends

Administrative Policy No. 1200.001 (Travel and Other Expense Reimbursement Policy) requires all City Officials to obtain approval from the City Council for event registration and other related fees.

ANALYSIS:

The 2024 League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo will be held from October 16th to 18th, 2024, in Long Beach, California. Council Member Speake, who serves on the Housing, Community, and Economic Development Policy Committee, has requested to attend the three-day event and represent the City.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

City Council Members’ travel and other expense reimbursements are funded by the City Council’s operating budget in the General Fund. Funding for this request is included in the approved Fiscal Year 2025 Budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to section 15061 (b)(3) for the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This action seeks Council approval for Council Member Speake’s travel request.
there is no possibility that approving the recommended action will have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no environmental analysis is required.

PREPARED BY: ANGELA NIETO, EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
REVIEWED BY: JACOB ELLIS, CITY MANAGER
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – City Official Advance Travel Request

Page 476 of 484 ends

CA\DD\04000.12003\10190947.4

CITY OF CORONA
CITY OFFICIAL ADVANCE TRAVEL REQUEST (AP 01200.001)
Council Member Wes Speake is requesting to travel to Long Beach, CA. to attend the League of California Cities 2024 Annual Conference & Expo on October 16th – 18th, 2024. Council Member Speake is on the Housing, Community, and Economic Development Policy Committee and the League of California Cities Annual Conference is a valued tradition attended by the Council and staff members from many California cities. The conference provides networking, advocacy, and educational programs that bring together elected and appointed officials, as well as city staff from all departmental areas to serve the grassroots interests of local municipalities. All actual and necessary expenses incurred by Council Member Wes Speake for this trip, including any registration, meals, and transportation, will be paid for or reimbursed by the City, so long as and to the extent such expenses comply with Administrative Policy 01200.001, Travel and Other Expense Reimbursement Policy. Estimated total costs for the requested trip are listed below:

Registration Meals Lodging Transportation Airfare
Other
(Please
list) Total*
$700.00 $86.00 $ n/a $ $178.27 $ n/a $ $964.27
* Total cost is an estimate only, based on event information provided by requestor.

ATTACHMENTS: Registration, Meals, and Transportation.

PREPARED BY: _________________________ Date: ______________ Angela Nieto
REQUESTED BY: _________________________ Date: ______________ Wes Speake
COST ESTIMATED BY: _________________________ Date: ______________ Administrative Services Dept.

APPROVED BY: _________________________ Date: ______________ Mayor
Docusign Envelope ID: 26111D51-9D42-4B1B-BA7D-258F54B1BBCA 8/26/2024
8/26/2024
8/26/2024

Page 477 of 484 ends

CA\DD\04000.12003\10190947.4
Guidelines and Procedures for City Official Advance Travel Request Form The following are to be used in conjunction with Administrative Policy 01200.001 (Travel & Other Expense Reimbursement Policy). These guidelines and procedures in no way supersede or override Administrative Policy 01200.001. • The City Official Advance Travel Request Form is to be used whenever a City Official is requesting to travel either overnight or via airplane. • Pursuant to Administrative Policy 01200.001, City Officials include elected officials and appointed members of City legislative bodies.
• Pursuant to Administrative Policy 01200.001, City Officials will be reimbursed for their actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of the official duties for their position, provided that reimbursement shall always be at the lesser of the actual cost or the current Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rates, unless otherwise approved by the City Council in advance as discussed further below. • Pursuant to Administrative Policy 01200.001, advance approval shall be obtained from the City Council, unless the Mayor finds that last minute travel up to $1,000 is necessary and advance Council agenda deadlines cannot be met. With Mayor approval, reporting must be made to the City Council at the next available meeting. • Approval shall be obtained before incurring any expenses. Expenses incurred outside the approved parameter of travel, as noted on the City Official Advance Travel Request Form, or in excess of that allowed under Administrative Policy 01200.001, will not be borne by the City. If these expenses are paid by the City Official, no reimbursement will be made by the City; if these expenses were charged to a City credit card, the City Official is responsible for the expense and shall promptly reimburse the City.
• As noted in Administrative Policy 01200.001, the City will not pay or reimburse certain categories of expenses, including, but not limited to, the following:
o Personal portion of the trip, including expenses incurred for family member(s), friends and/or pets who accompany the City Official;
o Travel relating to political events;
o Entertainment expenses not directly required as part of official business; o Personal automobile expenses, including traffic citation; o Personal losses incurred while on City business.
• City Officials shall provide necessary documentation such as receipts and hotel folio to substantiate all expenses incurred. Expenses incurred without receipts will not be reimbursed; if such an expense is charged on a City credit card, the City may request the City Official to reimburse the City if the expense cannot be substantiated in another manner.

Docusign Envelope ID: 26111D51-9D42-4B1B-BA7D-258F54B1BBCA

Page 478 of 484 ends

Thank you for your purchase!
Order SC-C-972789-H4NNI
Date of purchase: 8/26/2024
Payment: Credit Card **** 8668
Bill To: Nieto, Angela
Gift Card: -
PO #:

Bill To Address
Angela Nieto
400 S Vicentia Ave # 315
Corona, CA 92882-2187
INV-20814-M9Z0B8
a) Full Conference - Member City Officials & City Staff - Speake, Wes Price per unit
$700.00
Quantity
1 Discount
$0.00
Taxes
$0.00
Charges
$700.00
Total Charges $700.00
Sales Tax $0.00
Order Total $700.00
Gift Card $0.00
Previous Payments $0.00
Payment $700.00
Balance Due $0.00
Docusign Envelope ID: 26111D51-9D42-4B1B-BA7D-258F54B1BBCA

Page 479 of 484 ends

Wednesday, October 16, 2024 Thursday, October 17, 2024 Friday, October 18, 2024 Total Breakfast $17 Breakfast $17 X $34
Lunch X Lunch X Lunch $18 $18
Dinner X Dinner $34 X $34
TOTAL $86.00
Docusign Envelope ID: 26111D51-9D42-4B1B-BA7D-258F54B1BBCA

Page 480 of 484 ends

Corona City Hall
400 S Vicentia Ave, Corona, CA 92882
Get on CA-91 W from W 2nd St and S Lincoln Ave

1. Head north toward S Buena Vista Ave

2. Turn right toward S Buena Vista Ave

3. Turn left toward S Buena Vista Ave

4. Turn right onto S Buena Vista Ave

5. Turn left onto W 2nd St

6. Turn right onto S Lincoln Ave

7. Turn left to merge onto CA-91 W
Continue on CA-91 W. Take CA-55 S to CA-22 W in Seal
Beach. Take exit 23 from I-405 N

8. Merge onto CA-91 W

9. Continue straight to stay on CA-91 W

10. Use the left 2 lanes to take exit 34 for CA-55 S
toward Newport Beach

11. Continue onto CA-55 S

12. Use the right 2 lanes to take exit 13 for CA-22
W/Garden Grove Fwy toward Long Beach

13. Continue onto CA-22 W/Garden Grove Fwy

14. Keep right to continue on CA-22 W
4 min (1.0 mi)
13 ft
62 ft
371 ft

0.1 mi

0.3 mi

0.2 mi

0.3 mi
33 min (35.2 mi)

5.6 mi

9.0 mi

0.5 mi

4.4 mi

0.4 mi

11.8 mi

0.8 mi
Corona City Hall, 400 S Vicentia Ave, Corona, CA Drive 42.5 miles, 1 hr 7 min 92882 to Long Beach Convention & Entertainment Center, 300 E Ocean Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90802
Breakdown of fees:

42.5 x $.67 = $28.47
$28.47 x 3 days = $84.41
Docusign Envelope ID: 26111D51-9D42-4B1B-BA7D-258F54B1BBCA

Page 481 of 484 ends

15. Merge onto CA-22 W/I-405 N

16. Use the right 2 lanes to take exit 23 for CA-22 W
toward Long Beach
Continue on CA-22 W. Take E 7th St and E Ocean Blvd to E Seaside Way in Long Beach

17. Continue onto CA-22 W

18. Continue straight onto E 7th St

19. Turn left onto Junipero Ave

20. Turn right onto E Ocean Blvd

21. Turn left onto S Linden Ave

22. Turn right onto E Seaside Way
Long Beach Convention & Entertainment Center
300 E Ocean Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90802

2.0 mi

0.8 mi
18 min (6.3 mi)

1.6 mi

2.3 mi

0.8 mi

1.1 mi
331 ft

0.3 mi
Docusign Envelope ID: 26111D51-9D42-4B1B-BA7D-258F54B1BBCA

Page 482 of 484 ends

Map data ©2024 Google 2 mi
Explore nearby Corona City Hall
1 hr 30 min

48.1 miles
via I-405 S
Fastest route now, avoids
slowdowns
This route has tolls.

1 hr 41 min

49.0 miles
via CA-22 E and CA-91 E
Heavy traffic, as usual

1 hr 45 min

46.2 miles
via CA-91 E
Slowdown and crashes causing 44-
min delay

Long Beach Convention Center, 300 E Ocean Drive 48.1 miles, 1 hr 30 min Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90802 to Corona City Hall, 400 S Vicentia Ave, Corona, CA 92882
End of conference back to Corona
Docusign Envelope ID: 26111D51-9D42-4B1B-BA7D-258F54B1BBCA

Page 483 of 484 ends

DATE: 08/28/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Council Member Daddario
2024-34

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

APPOINTMENT TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMISSION
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council approve the appointment of Robert Bogg to the Parks and Recreation Commission.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

Vacancy to the Parks and Recreation Commission was posted pursuant to Section 54972 of the Government Code.

Page 484 of 484 ends
← All documents from this meeting