Agenda packet — Corona City Council, June 18, 2025 (part 16 of 17)

Engineer's Report Page 2367 of 2543
68-2300 - LMD 84-2 Zone 20
Fiscal Year 2026
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
Assessment Roll
114410051 $415.22 114410052 $415.22 114410053 $415.22
114410054 $415.22 114410055 $415.22 114410056 $415.22
114410057 $415.22 114421001 $415.22 114421002 $415.22
114421003 $415.22 114421004 $415.22 114421005 $415.22
114421006 $415.22 114421007 $415.22 114421008 $415.22
114421009 $415.22 114421010 $415.22 114421011 $415.22
114421012 $415.22 114421013 $415.22 114421014 $415.22
114421015 $415.22 114421016 $415.22 114421017 $415.22
114421018 $415.22 114421019 $415.22 114421020 $415.22
114421021 $415.22 114421022 $415.22 114422001 $415.22
114422002 $415.22 114422003 $415.22 114422004 $415.22
114422005 $415.22 114422006 $415.22 114422007 $415.22
114422008 $415.22 114422009 $415.22 114422010 $415.22
114422011 $415.22 114422012 $415.22 114422013 $415.22
114422014 $415.22 114423001 $415.22 114423002 $415.22
114423003 $415.22 114423004 $415.22 114423005 $415.22
114423006 $415.22 114423007 $415.22 114423008 $415.22
114423009 $415.22 114423010 $415.22 114423011 $415.22
114423012 $415.22 114423013 $415.22 114423014 $415.22
114423015 $415.22 114423018 $415.22 114423019 $415.22
114423020 $415.22 114423021 $415.22 114423022 $415.22
114423023 $415.22 114423024 $415.22 114431001 $415.22
114431002 $415.22 114431003 $415.22 114431004 $415.22
114431005 $415.22 114431006 $415.22 114431007 $415.22
114431008 $415.22 114431009 $415.22 114431010 $415.22
114431011 $415.22 114431012 $415.22 114431013 $415.22
114431014 $415.22 114431015 $415.22 114431016 $415.22
114431017 $415.22 114432002 $415.22 114432003 $415.22
114432004 $415.22 114432005 $415.22 114432006 $415.22
114432007 $415.22 114432008 $415.22 114432009 $415.22
114432010 $415.22 114432011 $415.22 114432012 $415.22
114432013 $415.22 114432014 $415.22 114432015 $415.22
114432016 $415.22 114432017 $415.22 114432018 $415.22
114432019 $415.22 114432020 $415.22 114432021 $415.22
114432022 $415.22 114432023 $415.22 114432024 $415.22
114432026 $415.22 114432027 $415.22 114432028 $415.22
114432029 $415.22 114432030 $415.22 114432032 $415.22
114441001 $415.22 114441002 $415.22 114441003 $415.22
114441004 $415.22 114441005 $415.22 114441006 $415.22
114441007 $415.22 114441008 $415.22 114441009 $415.22
114441010 $415.22 114441011 $415.22 114442001 $415.22
114442002 $415.22 114442003 $415.22 114442004 $415.22
114442005 $415.22 114442006 $415.22 114442007 $415.22

Page 133 of 142 ends

Engineer's Report Page 2368 of 2543
68-2300 - LMD 84-2 Zone 20
Fiscal Year 2026
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
Assessment Roll
114442008 $415.22 114442009 $415.22 114442010 $415.22
114442011 $415.22 114442012 $415.22 114442013 $415.22
114442014 $415.22 114442015 $415.22 114442016 $415.22
114442017 $415.22 114442018 $415.22 114443001 $415.22
114443002 $415.22 114443003 $415.22 114443004 $415.22
114443005 $415.22 114443006 $415.22 114443007 $415.22
114443008 $415.22 114443009 $415.22 114443010 $415.22
114443011 $415.22 114443015 $415.22 114443016 $415.22
114443017 $415.22 114443018 $415.22 114451001 $415.22
114451002 $415.22 114451003 $415.22 114451004 $415.22
114451005 $415.22 114451006 $415.22 114451007 $415.22
114451008 $415.22 114452001 $415.22 114452002 $415.22
114452003 $415.22 114452004 $415.22 114452005 $415.22
114452006 $415.22 114452007 $415.22 114452008 $415.22
114452009 $415.22 114452010 $415.22 114452011 $415.22
114452012 $415.22 114452013 $415.22 114452014 $415.22
114452015 $415.22 114452016 $415.22 114452017 $415.22
114452018 $415.22 114452019 $415.22 114452020 $415.22
114452021 $415.22 114452022 $415.22 114452023 $415.22
114452024 $415.22 114452025 $415.22 114452026 $415.22
114453001 $415.22 114453002 $415.22 114453003 $415.22
114453004 $415.22 114453005 $415.22 114453006 $415.22
114453007 $415.22 114453008 $415.22 114453009 $415.22
114453010 $415.22 114453011 $415.22 114453012 $415.22
114453013 $415.22 114453014 $415.22 114453015 $415.22
114453016 $415.22 114453017 $415.22 114453018 $415.22
114453019 $415.22 114453020 $415.22 114453023 $415.22
114453024 $415.22 114453025 $415.22 114453026 $415.22
114453027 $415.22 114453028 $415.22 114453029 $415.22
114461001 $415.22 114461002 $415.22 114461003 $415.22
114461004 $415.22 114461005 $415.22 114461006 $415.22
114462001 $415.22 114462002 $415.22 114462003 $415.22
114462004 $415.22 114462005 $415.22 114462006 $415.22
114462007 $415.22 114462008 $415.22 114462009 $415.22
114462010 $415.22 114462011 $415.22 114462012 $415.22
114463001 $415.22 114463002 $415.22 114463004 $415.22
114463005 $415.22 114463006 $415.22 114463007 $415.22
114463008 $415.22 114463009 $415.22 114463010 $415.22
114463011 $415.22 114463012 $415.22 114463013 $415.22
114463014 $415.22 114463015 $415.22 114463016 $415.22
114463017 $415.22 114463018 $415.22 114463019 $415.22
114463020 $415.22 114463021 $415.22 114463022 $415.22
114463023 $415.22 114464001 $415.22 114464002 $415.22

Page 134 of 142 ends

Engineer's Report Page 2369 of 2543
68-2300 - LMD 84-2 Zone 20
Fiscal Year 2026
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
Assessment Roll
114464003 $415.22 114464004 $415.22 114464005 $415.22
114464006 $415.22 114465001 $415.22 114465002 $415.22
114465003 $415.22 114465004 $415.22 114466001 $415.22
114466002 $415.22 114466003 $415.22 114466004 $415.22
114466005 $415.22 114466006 $415.22 114466007 $415.22
114466008 $415.22 114466009 $415.22 114466010 $415.22
114466011 $415.22 114471001 $415.22 114471002 $415.22
114471003 $415.22 114471004 $415.22 114471005 $415.22
114471006 $415.22 114471007 $415.22 114471008 $415.22
114471009 $415.22 114471010 $415.22 114471011 $415.22
114471012 $415.22 114471013 $415.22 114471014 $415.22
114471015 $415.22 114471016 $415.22 114471017 $415.22
114471018 $415.22 114471019 $415.22 114471020 $415.22
114471021 $415.22 114471022 $415.22 114471023 $415.22
114471024 $415.22 114471025 $415.22 114471026 $415.22
114471027 $415.22 114471028 $415.22 114472001 $415.22
114472002 $415.22 114472003 $415.22 114472004 $415.22
114472005 $415.22 114472006 $415.22 114472007 $415.22
114472008 $415.22 114472009 $415.22 114472010 $415.22
114472011 $415.22 114472012 $415.22 114472013 $415.22
114472014 $415.22 114472015 $415.22 114472016 $415.22
114472017 $415.22 114472018 $415.22 114472019 $415.22
114472020 $415.22 114472021 $415.22 114472022 $415.22
114472023 $415.22 114472024 $415.22 114473001 $415.22
114473002 $415.22 114473003 $415.22 114473004 $415.22
114473005 $415.22 114473006 $415.22 114473007 $415.22
114473008 $415.22 114473009 $415.22 114481001 $415.22
114481002 $415.22 114481003 $415.22 114481004 $415.22
114481005 $415.22 114481006 $415.22 114481008 $415.22
114481009 $415.22 114481010 $415.22 114481011 $415.22
114481012 $415.22 114481013 $415.22 114481014 $415.22
114481015 $415.22 114481016 $415.22 114481018 $415.22
114481019 $415.22 114481020 $415.22 114481021 $415.22
114481022 $415.22 114481023 $415.22 114481024 $415.22
114481025 $415.22 114481026 $415.22 114481027 $415.22
114481028 $415.22 114481030 $415.22 114481031 $415.22
114481033 $415.22 114481034 $415.22 114481035 $415.22
114481036 $415.22 114481037 $415.22 114481039 $415.22
114481040 $415.22 114481041 $415.22 114481042 $415.22
114481044 $415.22 114481045 $415.22 114481046 $415.22
114481047 $415.22 114481048 $415.22 114481049 $415.22
114481051 $415.22 114481052 $415.22 114481053 $415.22
114481054 $415.22 114481055 $415.22 114481057 $415.22

Page 135 of 142 ends

Engineer's Report Page 2370 of 2543
68-2300 - LMD 84-2 Zone 20
Fiscal Year 2026
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
Assessment Roll
114481058 $415.22 114481059 $415.22 114481060 $415.22
114481061 $415.22 114481063 $415.22 114481064 $415.22
114481065 $415.22 114481066 $415.22 114481067 $415.22
114481068 $415.22 114481069 $415.22 114481071 $415.22
114481072 $415.22 114481073 $415.22 114481074 $415.22
114481075 $415.22 114481076 $415.22 114481077 $415.22
114481078 $415.22 114481079 $415.22 114481080 $415.22
114481082 $415.22 114481083 $415.22 114481084 $415.22
114481085 $415.22 114481086 $415.22 114481087 $415.22
114481088 $415.22 114481090 $415.22 114481091 $415.22
114481092 $415.22 114481093 $415.22 114481094 $415.22
114481095 $415.22 114481096 $415.22 114481097 $415.22
114481098 $415.22 114491001 $415.22 114491002 $415.22
114491003 $415.22 114491004 $415.22 114491005 $415.22
114491007 $415.22 114491008 $415.22 114491009 $415.22
114491010 $415.22 114491011 $415.22 114491013 $415.22
114491014 $415.22 114491015 $415.22 114491017 $415.22
114491018 $415.22 114491019 $415.22 114491021 $415.22
114491022 $415.22 114491023 $415.22 114491024 $415.22
114491025 $415.22 114491026 $415.22 114491027 $415.22
114491028 $415.22 114491029 $415.22 114491031 $415.22
114491032 $415.22 114491033 $415.22 114491035 $415.22
114491036 $415.22 114491037 $415.22 114491039 $415.22
114491040 $415.22 114491041 $415.22 114491042 $415.22
114491044 $415.22 114491045 $415.22 114491046 $415.22
114491047 $415.22 114491048 $415.22 114491050 $415.22
114491051 $415.22 114491052 $415.22 114491053 $415.22
114491054 $415.22 114491055 $415.22 114491056 $415.22
114491057 $415.22 114491058 $415.22 114491059 $415.22
114491060 $415.22 114511001 $415.22 114511002 $415.22
114511003 $415.22 114511004 $415.22 114511005 $415.22
114511006 $415.22 114511007 $415.22 114511008 $415.22
114511009 $415.22 114511010 $415.22 114511012 $415.22
114511013 $415.22 114511014 $415.22 114511015 $415.22
114511016 $415.22 114511017 $415.22 114511018 $415.22
114511019 $415.22 114511021 $415.22 114511022 $415.22
114511023 $415.22 114511024 $415.22 114511026 $415.22
114511027 $415.22 114511028 $415.22 114511029 $415.22
114511030 $415.22 114511031 $415.22 114511032 $415.22
114511033 $415.22 114511035 $415.22 114511036 $415.22
114511037 $415.22 114511038 $415.22 114511039 $415.22
114511040 $415.22 114511042 $415.22 114511043 $415.22
114511044 $415.22 114511045 $415.22 114511046 $415.22

Page 136 of 142 ends

Engineer's Report Page 2371 of 2543
68-2300 - LMD 84-2 Zone 20
Fiscal Year 2026
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
Assessment Roll
114521001 $415.22 114521002 $415.22 114521003 $415.22
114521004 $415.22 114521005 $415.22 114521006 $415.22
114521007 $415.22 114521008 $415.22 114521009 $415.22
114521010 $415.22 114521012 $415.22 114521013 $415.22
114521014 $415.22 114521015 $415.22 114521016 $415.22
114521018 $415.22 114521019 $415.22 114521021 $415.22
114521022 $415.22 114521024 $415.22 114521025 $415.22
114521026 $415.22 114521027 $415.22 114521028 $415.22
114521029 $415.22 114521030 $415.22 114521031 $415.22
114521033 $415.22 114521034 $415.22 114521035 $415.22
114521036 $415.22 114521037 $415.22 114521038 $415.22
114521039 $415.22 114521040 $415.22 114521041 $415.22
114521043 $415.22 114521044 $415.22 114521045 $415.22
114521046 $415.22 114521047 $415.22 114521048 $415.22
114521049 $415.22 114521050 $415.22 114521051 $415.22
114521052 $415.22 114521054 $415.22 114521055 $415.22
114521056 $415.22 114521057 $415.22 114521058 $415.22
114521059 $415.22 114521060 $415.22 114521061 $415.22
114521063 $415.22 114521064 $415.22 114521065 $415.22
114521066 $415.22 114521067 $415.22 114521068 $415.22
114521069 $415.22 114521070 $415.22 114521072 $415.22
114521073 $415.22 114521074 $415.22 114521075 $415.22
114521076 $415.22 114521077 $415.22 114521078 $415.22
114521080 $415.22 114521081 $415.22 114521082 $415.22
114521083 $415.22 114531001 $415.22 114531002 $415.22
114531003 $415.22 114531004 $415.22 114531005 $415.22
114531006 $415.22 114531008 $415.22 114531009 $415.22
114531010 $415.22 114531011 $415.22 114531012 $415.22
114531013 $415.22 114531015 $415.22 114531016 $415.22
114531017 $415.22 114531018 $415.22 114531020 $415.22
114531021 $415.22 114531022 $415.22 114531024 $415.22
114531025 $415.22 114531026 $415.22 114531027 $415.22
114531028 $415.22 114531030 $415.22 114531031 $415.22
114531032 $415.22 114531033 $415.22 114531034 $415.22
114531036 $415.22 114531037 $415.22 114531039 $415.22
114531040 $415.22 114531041 $415.22 114531042 $415.22
114531043 $415.22 114531044 $415.22 114531046 $415.22
114531047 $415.22 114531049 $415.22 114531050 $415.22
114531051 $415.22 114531053 $415.22 114531055 $415.22
114531056 $415.22 114531057 $415.22 114531058 $415.22
114531059 $415.22 114531060 $415.22 114531061 $415.22
114531063 $415.22 114531064 $415.22 114531065 $415.22
114531066 $415.22 114531067 $415.22 114531068 $415.22

Page 137 of 142 ends

Engineer's Report Page 2372 of 2543
68-2300 - LMD 84-2 Zone 20
Fiscal Year 2026
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
Assessment Roll
114531069 $415.22 114531071 $415.22 114531072 $415.22
114531073 $415.22 114531074 $415.22 114531075 $415.22
114531076 $415.22 114531078 $415.22 114531079 $415.22
114531080 $415.22 114531081 $415.22 114531083 $415.22
114531085 $415.22 114531086 $415.22 114531087 $415.22
114531089 $415.22 114531090 $415.22 114531091 $415.22
114531092 $415.22 114532001 $415.22 114532002 $415.22
114532003 $415.22 114532004 $415.22 114532005 $415.22
114532006 $415.22 114532007 $415.22 114532008 $415.22
114532009 $415.22 114532010 $415.22 114532011 $415.22
114532012 $415.22 114532013 $415.22 114532014 $415.22
114532015 $415.22 114532016 $415.22 114532017 $415.22
114532018 $415.22 114532020 $415.22 114532021 $415.22
114532022 $415.22 114532023 $415.22 114532024 $415.22
114532025 $415.22 114532026 $415.22 114532027 $415.22
114532028 $415.22 114532029 $415.22 114532030 $415.22
114532031 $415.22 114532032 $415.22 114532033 $415.22
114532034 $415.22 114532035 $415.22 114532036 $415.22
114532037 $415.22 114532038 $415.22 114532039 $415.22
114532041 $415.22 114532042 $415.22 114541001 $415.22
114541002 $415.22 114541003 $415.22 114541004 $415.22
114541005 $415.22 114541007 $415.22 114541008 $415.22
114541009 $415.22 114541010 $415.22 114541011 $415.22
114541013 $415.22 114541014 $415.22 114541015 $415.22
114541016 $415.22 114541017 $415.22 114541019 $415.22
114541020 $415.22 114541021 $415.22 114541022 $415.22
114541023 $415.22 114541024 $415.22 114541026 $415.22
114541027 $415.22 114541029 $415.22 114541030 $415.22
114541031 $415.22 114541032 $415.22 114541034 $415.22
114541035 $415.22 114541036 $415.22 114541037 $415.22
114541038 $415.22 114541039 $415.22 114541040 $415.22
114541042 $415.22 114541043 $415.22 114541044 $415.22
114541045 $415.22 114541046 $415.22 114551001 $415.22
114551002 $415.22 114551003 $415.22 114551005 $415.22
114551006 $415.22 114551007 $415.22 114551008 $415.22
114551010 $415.22 114551011 $415.22 114551012 $415.22
114551013 $415.22 114551014 $415.22 114551015 $415.22
114551017 $415.22 114551018 $415.22 114551019 $415.22
114551020 $415.22 114551021 $415.22 114551022 $415.22
114551023 $415.22 114551025 $415.22 114551026 $415.22
114551027 $415.22 114551028 $415.22 114551029 $415.22
114551030 $415.22 114551031 $415.22 114551032 $415.22
114551033 $415.22 114551035 $415.22 114551036 $415.22

Page 138 of 142 ends

Engineer's Report Page 2373 of 2543
68-2300 - LMD 84-2 Zone 20
Fiscal Year 2026
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
Assessment Roll
114551037 $415.22 114551038 $415.22 114551039 $415.22
114551040 $415.22 114551041 $415.22 114560007 $415.22
114560008 $415.22 114560009 $415.22 114560010 $415.22
114560020 $415.22 114560021 $415.22 114571001 $415.22
114571002 $415.22 114571003 $415.22 114571005 $415.22
114571006 $415.22 114571007 $415.22 114571008 $415.22
114571010 $415.22 114571011 $415.22 114571012 $415.22
114571014 $415.22 114571016 $415.22 114571017 $415.22
114571018 $415.22 114571020 $415.22 114571021 $415.22
114571023 $415.22 114571024 $415.22 114571025 $415.22
114571026 $415.22 114571027 $415.22 114571028 $415.22
114571029 $415.22 114571030 $415.22 114571031 $415.22
114571032 $415.22 114571034 $415.22 114571035 $415.22
114571037 $415.22 114571039 $415.22 114571040 $415.22
114571041 $415.22 114571042 $415.22 114571043 $415.22
114571045 $415.22 114571046 $415.22 114571047 $415.22
114571048 $415.22 114571049 $415.22 114571050 $415.22
114571051 $415.22 114571052 $415.22 114571054 $415.22
114571055 $415.22 114571056 $415.22 114571057 $415.22
114571059 $415.22 114571060 $415.22 114571062 $415.22
114571063 $415.22 114571064 $415.22 114571065 $415.22
114571066 $415.22 114571067 $415.22 114571068 $415.22
114571069 $415.22 114571070 $415.22 114571072 $415.22
114571073 $415.22 114571074 $415.22 114571075 $415.22
114571076 $415.22 114571077 $415.22 114571079 $415.22
114571081 $415.22 114571082 $415.22 114571083 $415.22
114571084 $415.22 114571085 $415.22 114571086 $415.22
114572001 $415.22 114572002 $415.22 114572003 $415.22
114572004 $415.22 114572005 $415.22 114572006 $415.22
114572007 $415.22 114572009 $415.22 114572010 $415.22
114572011 $415.22 114572012 $415.22 114572014 $415.22
114572015 $415.22 114572016 $415.22 114572017 $415.22
114572018 $415.22 114572020 $415.22 114572021 $415.22
114572022 $415.22 114572023 $415.22 114572025 $415.22
114572026 $415.22 114572027 $415.22 114572028 $415.22
114572029 $415.22 114572030 $415.22 114572031 $415.22
114572033 $415.22 114572034 $415.22 114572036 $415.22
114572037 $415.22 114572038 $415.22 114581001 $415.22
114581002 $415.22 114581003 $415.22 114581004 $415.22
114581005 $415.22 114581006 $415.22 114581007 $415.22
114581008 $415.22 114581010 $415.22 114581011 $415.22
114581012 $415.22 114581013 $415.22 114581014 $415.22
114581015 $415.22 114581016 $415.22 114581017 $415.22

Page 139 of 142 ends

Engineer's Report Page 2374 of 2543
68-2300 - LMD 84-2 Zone 20
Fiscal Year 2026
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
Assessment Roll
114581019 $415.22 114581020 $415.22 114581021 $415.22
114581023 $415.22 114581024 $415.22 114581025 $415.22
114581026 $415.22 114581027 $415.22 114581028 $415.22
114581029 $415.22 114581031 $415.22 114581032 $415.22
114581033 $415.22 114581034 $415.22 114581035 $415.22
114581036 $415.22 114581037 $415.22 114581039 $415.22
114581040 $415.22 114581041 $415.22 114581042 $415.22
114581044 $415.22 114581045 $415.22 114581046 $415.22
114581047 $415.22 114581048 $415.22 114581049 $415.22
114581050 $415.22 114581052 $415.22 114581053 $415.22
114581054 $415.22 114581055 $415.22 114581057 $415.22
114581058 $415.22 114581059 $415.22 114581060 $415.22
114581062 $415.22 114581063 $415.22 114581064 $415.22
114581065 $415.22 114581066 $415.22 114581067 $415.22
114581068 $415.22 114581070 $415.22 114581071 $415.22
114581072 $415.22 114581073 $415.22 114581074 $415.22
114581075 $415.22 114581076 $415.22 114581077 $415.22
114581078 $415.22 114581079 $415.22 114591001 $415.22
114591002 $415.22 114591003 $415.22 114591004 $415.22
114591005 $415.22 114591006 $415.22 114591007 $415.22
114591008 $415.22 114591010 $415.22 114591011 $415.22
114591012 $415.22 114591013 $415.22 114591014 $415.22
114591015 $415.22 114591016 $415.22 114591017 $415.22
114591018 $415.22 114591019 $415.22 114591020 $415.22
114591021 $415.22 114591022 $415.22 114591023 $415.22
114591024 $415.22 114591025 $415.22 114591026 $415.22
114591027 $415.22 114591028 $415.22 114591029 $415.22
114591030 $415.22 114591031 $415.22 114591032 $415.22
114591033 $415.22 114591035 $415.22 114591036 $415.22
114591037 $415.22 114592001 $415.22 114592002 $415.22
114592003 $415.22 114592004 $415.22 114592005 $415.22
114592006 $415.22 114592007 $415.22 114592008 $415.22
114592009 $415.22 114592010 $415.22 114592011 $415.22
114592012 $415.22 114592013 $415.22 114592014 $415.22
114592015 $415.22 114592016 $415.22 114592017 $415.22
114592018 $415.22 114592019 $415.22 114592020 $415.22
114592021 $415.22 114592022 $415.22 114592023 $415.22
114592024 $415.22 114601001 $415.22 114601002 $415.22
114601003 $415.22 114601004 $415.22 114601005 $415.22
114601006 $415.22 114601007 $415.22 114601008 $415.22
114601009 $415.22 114601010 $415.22 114601011 $415.22
114601012 $415.22 114601013 $415.22 114601014 $415.22
114601015 $415.22 114601016 $415.22 114601017 $415.22

Page 140 of 142 ends

Engineer's Report Page 2375 of 2543
68-2300 - LMD 84-2 Zone 20
Fiscal Year 2026
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
Assessment Roll
114603001 $415.22 114603002 $415.22 114603003 $415.22
114603004 $415.22 114603005 $415.22 114603006 $415.22
114603007 $415.22 114603008 $415.22 114603009 $415.22
114603010 $415.22 114603011 $415.22 114603012 $415.22
114603013 $415.22 114603014 $415.22 114603015 $415.22
114603016 $415.22 114603017 $415.22 114603018 $415.22
114603019 $415.22 114611001 $415.22 114611002 $415.22
114611003 $415.22 114611004 $415.22 114611005 $415.22
114611006 $415.22 114612001 $415.22 114612002 $415.22
114612003 $415.22 114612004 $415.22 114612005 $415.22
114612006 $415.22 114612007 $415.22 114612008 $415.22
114612009 $415.22 114612010 $415.22 114612011 $415.22
116171001 $415.22 116171002 $415.22 116171003 $415.22
116171004 $415.22 116171005 $415.22 116171006 $415.22
116171007 $415.22 116171008 $415.22 116171011 $415.22
116171012 $415.22 116171013 $415.22 116171014 $415.22
116171015 $415.22 116171016 $415.22 116171017 $415.22
116171018 $415.22 116171019 $415.22 116171020 $415.22
116172001 $415.22 116172002 $415.22 116172003 $415.22
116172004 $415.22 116172005 $415.22 116172006 $415.22
116172007 $415.22 116172008 $415.22 116172009 $415.22
116172010 $415.22 116172011 $415.22 116172012 $415.22
116172013 $415.22 116172014 $415.22 116172015 $415.22
116172016 $415.22 116172017 $415.22 116172018 $415.22
116172019 $415.22 116172020 $415.22 116172021 $415.22
116172022 $415.22 116172023 $415.22 116181001 $415.22
116181002 $415.22 116181003 $415.22 116181004 $415.22
116181005 $415.22 116181006 $415.22 116181007 $415.22
116181008 $415.22 116181009 $415.22 116181010 $415.22
116181011 $415.22 116181012 $415.22 116181013 $415.22
116181014 $415.22 116182001 $415.22 116182002 $415.22
116182003 $415.22 116182004 $415.22 116182005 $415.22
116182006 $415.22 116182007 $415.22 116182008 $415.22
116182009 $415.22 116182010 $415.22 116182011 $415.22
116182012 $415.22 116191001 $415.22 116191002 $415.22
116191003 $415.22 116191004 $415.22 116191005 $415.22
116191006 $415.22 116191007 $415.22 116191008 $415.22
116192001 $415.22 116192002 $415.22 116192003 $415.22
116192004 $415.22 116192006 $415.22 116192007 $415.22
116192008 $415.22 116192009 $415.22 116192010 $415.22
116192011 $415.22 116192012 $415.22 116192013 $415.22
116192014 $415.22 116192015 $415.22 116192016 $415.22
116192017 $415.22 116192018 $415.22 116192019 $415.22

Page 141 of 142 ends

Engineer's Report Page 2376 of 2543
68-2300 - LMD 84-2 Zone 20
Fiscal Year 2026
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
Assessment Roll
116192020 $415.22 116192021 $415.22 116192022 $415.22
116192023 $415.22 116192024 $415.22 116201001 $415.22
116201002 $415.22 116201003 $415.22 116201004 $415.22
116201005 $415.22 116201006 $415.22 116201007 $415.22
116201008 $415.22 116201009 $415.22 116201010 $415.22
116202003 $415.22 116202004 $415.22 116202005 $415.22
116202006 $415.22 116202007 $415.22 116202008 $415.22
116202009 $415.22 116202010 $415.22 116202011 $415.22
116202012 $415.22 116202013 $415.22 116202014 $415.22
116202015 $415.22 116202016 $415.22
116202023 $415.22 275100003 $415.22
Totals Parcels 2,482 Levy $1,068,673.38

Page 142 of 142 ends

Engineer's Report Page 2377 of 2543
Appendix B:

Assessment Diagrams

Page 2378 of 2543 ends

Aub
PalosVerdeDr
QueensdaleAve
MarinaRd
daleDr
BrookwoodDr
LakeviewDr
Shamro
BayfieldDr
CandyDr MillstreamLn
MarinaRd
RiverRoadPark
FallbrookDr
HarringtonSt
PalosVerdeDr
LakeviewDr
CreeksideLn
BrookwoodDr
BlossomHillDr
Bramble
Ln
SilverfernLn
NLincoln
Ave
N
LincolnAve
Acorn
Ln
Primrose
Ln
QueensparkRd
Dr
Tranq
NNormandy
NLincoln
Ave
NLin
RiverRd
Pathf
i
n
der
Way
Riv
AcornLn
PrimroseLn
Clover
Ln
PineconeDr
Willowc
re
ekD
r
ShadeTreeWay
NFoxtail
Dr
BlossomcreekLn
NettleCt
RiverRd
µ
Landscape Maintenance District No. 84 - 2
ZONE 1

Page 2379 of 2543 ends

BluffSt
aAnaRiver
SantaAnaRiver
RoundupRd
BluffSt
TrailSt
WagonTrainSt
HomesteadRd
Hemingway
Dr
StagecoachDr
Stagecoach
ParkFuture
RockRidgeCt
BigSpringCt
CorydonSt
WRinconSt
TrailSt
FairviewDr
CorydonSt
TrentonAve
MyrtleSt
LexingtonDr
CornerstoneWay
ChesapeakeWay
EllingtonDr
CarriageLn
ChamplainDr
ProvidenceWay
TrailSt
CarefreeWay
River
Rd
MyrtleSt
HedgesDr
MajesticDr
GreenbriarAve
NoahDr
DriftwoodSt
MeadowviewCt
RockcrestDr
PanoramicDr
WestbrookSt
Mo
DelMarRd
SantaAnitaRd
Del
MarRd
FairviewDr
Welsh
RiverRd
CountryC
Shopping
Center
FairviewPark
Kip
RollingHillsDr
Brookdale
Springbrook
MelroseDr
GranadaAve
CountryClubLn
ElmhurstDr
µ
Landscape Maintenance District No. 84 - 2
ZONE 2

Page 2380 of 2543 ends

KiwiCir
Wren
A
v
e
OrioleLn
EOntarioAve
Kaiser
Permenente
Medical
PoppyseedLn
AutumnLn
Rimp
auA
v
e
Baywood
D
r
RidgewoodDr
TurnberryLn
YardleyWay CoachmanLnYorkshireWay TrevorLn
TanfordLn HarvardCir
Devonshire
Dr
MonarchDr
L
ockwoodLn
B
ruinD
r
TalshireL
n
Hid
e
awayPl
BrightonCir StratfordDr
SanMarinoCt
EMonarchDr
PortofinoSt
FullertonAve
EOntarioAve
Stallings
Elementary
School
Turnberry
Ln
BirminghamDr
ErickDr
RiverviewCir
McMackinDr
ElliotDr
AutumnLn
Presc
ottCir
LochnessCir
EvanstonCir
RimpauAve
Fu
llerton
Ave
EOntarioAve
EOntarioAve
RimpauPark
Crossroads
Christian
Schools
A
b
erde
enD
r
µ
Landscape Maintenance District No. 84 - 2
ZONE 4

Page 2381 of 2543 ends

All
e
gre
D
r
El
Pas
NTe
mescalSt
MariposaDr
aC
sandra
Ln
NorcoHillsRd
JohnCir
LucyLn
HiddenValleyPkwy
lls
NDelilahSt
Ventura
Av
posaDr e
Maria
h
Ct
S
PromenadeAve
RiversideFwy
SaddlebackDr
GriffinWay
R
L
a
VistaAve
Rock
VistaDr
MondaleSt Stoneybrook
rD
S
henandoah
Rd
JohnC
ir
LaSalle
Ci
r
Baghdady
St
OldenbergLn
Ruth
C
ir
Hamil
to
n
Dr
StevenLn
MoritaDr
WycliffeSt
NMcKinleySt
SPromenadeAve
RiversideFwy
CoronaHills
Marketplace
ParkviewPark
Promenade
Park
RockVistaPark
CoronaCity
FireStation#4
NDelilah
St
WellesC
leyDr
ollettAve
NMcKinleySt
SampsonAve
SampsonAve
AnselmoDr
MagnoliaAve
RiversideFwy
RiversideFwy
LosArcosPlaza
CoronaHills
Plaza
McKinley
Crossroads
CountrySide
Center
91 BrittanyDr
EatonSt
JasonCt
CollettA
ElkBlvd
Madera
Way
Sampson
Ave
SPromenadeAve
BuchananSt
GriffinPark
HarlowAve
LincolnSt
MapleleafDr
DixieLn
SampsonAve
MeadowviewDr
Elmvie
HillviewDr
MagnoliaAve
YsmaelVillegas
MiddleSchool
µ
Landscape Maintenance District No. 84 - 2
ZONE 6

Page 2382 of 2543 ends

Aquamarin
BernDr
JadestoneLn
KirkwoodDr
Ave
nita
LarkLn
RainbowRidgeSt
Centenn
ial
Way
Dove
Ct
EmersonDr
MesquiteLn
MangularAve
Pat
ri
otWay
SageAve
Ma
n
za
nit
aR
d
W
On
t
a
rio
Ave
Applega
teD
r
istyMou
ntainDr
LongviewDr
KirkwoodDr
AdrienneDr
ViadelRio
DawnridgeDr
AvenidadelVista
CamelotDr
BorderAve
WOntarioAve
BorderPark
BrentwoodPark
JohnAdams
Elementary
School
DeerHollowDr
CapeDr
M
a
ng
ularAv
e
LindseyLn
WigeonDr
Border
Av
e
TealD
r
WFoothillPkwy
Norw
BorderA
CoronaHigh
School
Tu
rquo
iseDrF
airmon
tDr
O
a
kAve
ShadyMillRd
KroonenDr
ViaSantiago
MangularAve
MillbrookRd
Via
Pacifica
V
iaPacifica
Hibi
scu
s
St
ZirconSt
BridgeportRd
Eure
kaSt
Wate
rfall
L
Her n
itage
Dr
TopazSt
OldHickoryRd
Macbet
h
Ave
ViadelRio
CitronSt
CamelotDr
WOntarioAve
S
L
incolnAve
BorderAve
Benjamin
Franklin
Elementary
School
ShadyMillRd
LancasterLn OakAv
e
ViaMazatlan
VeraCruz
CoralSt
DouglasWay
WStillwaterRd
SLincoln
Ave
µ
Landscape Maintenance District No. 84 - 2
ZONE 7

Page 2383 of 2543 ends

FeatherRiverRd
Dominguez
Ranch
Rd
San
AlmadaRd
San
Ponte
Rd
PradoRd
GreenRiverRd
RiversideFwy
Und5
Un U
d4
nd6
ViaSantiago
OakridgeDr
RidgelineDr
aC
ny
o
n
CrestDr
PaseoGrande
Wardl PalisadesDr
owRd
ResearchDr
PomonaRd
PineCrestDr
AvenidadelVista
GreenRiverRd
SerfasClubDr
W6thSt
RiversideFwy
RiversideFwy
CesarChavez
Elementary
School
Centenni
a
lWay
ord B er
Ave
PaseoGrande
Green
RiverRd
Ma
n
gu
larAve
SageAve
W
OntarioAve
Ado
beAve
BrentwoodDr
MabeyCanyonRd
Av
e
nidade
l
Vista
WFoothill
P
wy
k
BorderAve
Ma
ngul
a
A
H
erita
g
µ
Landscape Maintenance District No. 84 - 2
ZONE 10

Page 2384 of 2543 ends

w
Av
e
2ndSt
1stSt
ValleyViewAve
HiddenValleyPkwy
CoronaFwy
way
tplace
HiddenValley
Plaza
arkridge
olForThe
Arts
aFire
ion
EParkridgeAve
Mesa
D
r
H
il
si l d
eAv
2ndSt
WillowDr
1stSt
ElPasoD
C
o
r
ronaAv
e
ViaBlairo
NTe
mescalSt
MariposaDr
Cas
andra
Ln
JohnCi
r
HillsideA
ve
Harness
Ln
MandevillaWay
Tucs
on
Ave
NParkridgeAve
HiddenValleyPkwy
CrestaVerde
GolfCourse
CoronaRanch
Elementary
School
CoronaHills
ECrestaRd
Roosevelt
S
t
MariposaDr
TerminoAve
CoronaFwy
CrestaVerde
GolfCourse
CrossRail
Ln
NorcoHillsRd
FriesianSt
GriffinWay
Rosemary
Cir
Rock
Vist
a
D
r
MondaleSt
NorcoHillsRd
AndalusianDr
JohnC
ir
LaSa
lleCir
Ruth
C
ir
Hamilt
o
n
rD
Mor
NMcKinleySt
SPromenadeAve
Riversi
CoronaHills
Marketplace
ParkviewPark
Promenade
Park
RockVistaPark
CoronaCity
FireStation#4
Weles
l
leyDr
ShenandoahRd
SampsonAve
LosArcosPlaza
CoronaHills
Plaza
CountrySide
Center
µ
Landscape Maintenance District No. 84 - 2
ZONE 14

Page 2385 of 2543 ends

BNSFRR
RailroadSt
Monic
aCir
METROLINK-West
Corona
KlugCir
RailroadSt
BNSFRR
RailroadSt
KlugCir
Bonn
ieCir
WestCorona
Station
Railro
Clearwater
SportsFields
BNSF
µ
Landscape Maintenance District No. 84 - 2
ZONE 15

Page 2386 of 2543 ends

RoundupR
RockRidgeCt
WagonTrainSt
CheyenneRd HomesteadRd
StagecoachDr
RockRidgeCt
BigSpringCt
HollisterSt
DickinsonLn
Trai
WagonTrainSt
HemingwayDr
StagecoachDr
Stagecoach
ParkFuture
BigSpringCt
CorydonSt
WRinconSt
StagecoachDr
µ
Landscape Maintenance District No. 84 - 2
ZONE 17

Page 2387 of 2543 ends

BrookwoodDr
Lakeview
Millst
Dr
reamLn
FallbrookDr
HarringtonSt
LakeviewDr
CreeksideLn
BrookwoodDr
Blossom
HillDr
BrambleLn
SilverfernLn
N
LincolnAve
WRinconSt
Acorn
Ln
QueensparkRd
NNormandyTe
FulhamSt
N
Lincoln
AveRiverRd
PathfinderWay
HarringtonSt
RiverRd
RiverRd
RiverRd
AcornLn PrimroseLn
ForesterDr
Clover
Ln
PineconeDr
Willowcreek
D
r
ShadeTreeWay
NFoxtailDr
EbbcreekSt
BlossomcreekLn
Hotspri
ngSt
RiverRd
RapidspringsDr
HarringtonSt
WParkridgeAve
RebeccaWay
PenroseDr
RedHeadLn
RiverRd
µ
Landscape Maintenance District No. 84 - 2
ZONE 18

Page 2388 of 2543 ends

Centenn
ialWay
Borde
r
Ave
MangularAve
Ave Aven
ida
FoothillPkwy
Garrets
on
Ave
Gar
SMain
S
t
SVicen
OakAve
CitrusWay
WHighgroveSt
M
a
SBelle
n
gula
Via
P
acif
ViaMazatlan
DonatelloDr
HeritageDr
ViewpointeLn
WMountainGateDr
OldMillRd
ValenciaRd
MontoyaDr
WFoothillPkwy
HudsonSt
Skylin
e
Dr
SMainSt
FullertonAve
WOntarioAve WOntarioAve
S
Lin
coln
Ave
EFoothillPkwy
WUpperDr
Santana
RegionalPark
GilbertAveS
MainSt
ClevelandWay
StrandbergCir
EUpperDr
RimpauAve
S
tateSt
OldTemescalRd
Turn
b
erryL
n
B
el
Ai
rSt
Gilbert
Ave
EChaseDr
ComptonAve
FullertonAve
EOntarioAve
CaliforniaAve
EFoothillPkwy
Fwy
Cor
o
naFwy
SantiagoHigh
School
CentennialHigh
School
LibertyAve
BoydA
ValenciaRd
PinewoodDr
Mo
ralesWay
ViaMiguelSt
nverness
I
Dr
LesterAv
e
CaliforniaAve
MastersDr
EFoothillPkwy
µ
Landscape Maintenance District No. 84 - 2
ZONE 19

Page 2389 of 2543 ends

Page 2390 of 2543 ends

Appendix C:

Capital Improvement Projects

Page 2391 of 2543 ends

Appendix C Capital Improvement Projects
City of Corona
Engineer’s Report LMD No. 84-2
Fiscal Year 2026
The Community Services Department is developing a master plan for each zone that would include capital projects, operational activities, and revenue requirements to meet the objectives and service levels desired. Revenue requirements are set to cover annual operating costs and build reserves over time to perform focused capital replacements year over year, or large capital replacements in one anticipated year. Projects will be brought before City Council for approval as they are developed through the master plan. Zone specific projects are listed below:

Zone 1 Capital Project
The City will be adding additional plants and trees to soften the DG strips adjacent to Lincoln Avenue.

Zone 4 Capital Project
The City will install new plant material where the previous material did not take and apply new mulch to the area.

Zone 10 Capital Projects
The City completed slope improvements along Dominguez Ranch and Fresno Canyon. The city will look into future slope improvements along Montana Ranch and Palisades Drive. In addition, the City will be performing a comprehensive fuel modification plan for the entire SDO area.

Zone 14 Capital Projects
The City will perform additional tree plantings to replace missing or dead trees along Hidden Valley and Mckinley.

Zone 20 Capital Projects
The City will be developing an overall Zone 20 Capital Improvement project to provide several landscape enhancements and address deferred maintenance items throughout the district. This will include landscaping, irrigation as well as the greenbelts.

Page 2392 of 2543 ends

PROJECT FUNDING OVERVIEW
PRIOR EXPENDITURES* ESTIMATED CARRY OVER TEN-YEAR PLAN TOTAL PROJECT COST - - 750,000 750,000
FY 2026 - 2035 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

FUNDING SOURCE
Est.

Carryover FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 TOTAL 470 - LMD 84-2 ZONE 20 - 750,000 - - - - - - - - - 750,000 TOTAL - 750,000 - - - - - - - - - 750,000
*Prior Expenditures up to 10 years.

LMD 84-2, ZONE 20 LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
PROJECT NUMBER FC-2026-04
PRIOITY LEVEL Tier III
LOCATION Citywide

ADMINISTERING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES
PROJECT EXPERT Moses Cortez
FUNDING STATUS New
CATEGORY Facilities, Parks & Open Space

DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
To enhance the landscape with infill planting, irrigation upgrades, and Green Belt improvements for both the aesthetic and environmental quality of the area.

CURRENT STATUS
New project for FY 2026.

OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
No operating budget impact identified at this time.

Page 2393 of 2543 ends

Appendix C Capital Improvement Projects
City of Corona
Engineer’s Report LMD No. 84-2
Fiscal Year 2026
Zone 10 Slope Maintenance Prioritization
FID Meter Address Area (SF) Total Cond.

CIP
Year Status Est. Cost Total Cost
133 1690 OAKRIDGE DR 3,195.26 3 1 Complete
53 1691 OAKRIDGE DR 64,682.45 3 1 Complete
65 1691 OAKRIDGE DR 11,287.38 3 1 Complete
267 1305 OAKRIDGE DR 7,888.40 5 1 Complete
286 1690 OAKRIDGE DR 13,091.00 7 1 Complete
164 1691 OAKRIDGE DR 969.03 9 1 Complete
76 1305 OAKRIDGE DR 97,523.62 11 1 Complete
97 1305 OAKRIDGE DR 27,409.66 11 1 Complete
268 1305 OAKRIDGE DR 16,830.93 11 1 Complete
129 1690 OAKRIDGE DR 138,377.16 11 1 Complete
166 1690 OAKRIDGE DR 51,101.87 11 1 Complete
115 1691 OAKRIDGE DR 129,243.74 11 1 Complete
167 1691 OAKRIDGE DR 10,920.96 11 1 Complete
118 1305 OAKRIDGE DR 168.00 12 1 Complete
102 1690 OAKRIDGE DR 3,338.00 12 1 Complete
141 1690 OAKRIDGE DR 5,401.00 12 1 Complete
114 1691 OAKRIDGE DR 6,908.00 12 1 Complete
52 1691 OAKRIDGE DR 241.00 12 1 Complete
121 1691 OAKRIDGE DR 132.00 12 1 Complete
150 1691 OAKRIDGE DR 167.00 12 1 Complete
165 1691 OAKRIDGE DR 212.00 12 1 Complete
280 67,400.76 4 1.5 Not Irrigated
269 1588 SAN PONTE 19,960.47 2 2 Complete
271 1208 DOMINGUEZ RANCH RD 16,679.64 3 2 Complete
270 1588 SAN PONTE 23,616.44 3 2 Complete
21 3786 GREEN RIVER RD A 23,616.44 3 2 Complete
1 825 HIGHLAND VIEW DR 93,375.95 3 2 Complete
44 1208 DOMINGUEZ RANCH RD 48,077.57 5 2 Complete
281 825 HIGHLAND VIEW DR 248,977.00 6 2 Complete
272 1208 DOMINGUEZ RANCH RD 17,987.41 9 2 Complete
86 1588 SAN PONTE 67,886.30 10 2 Complete
7 3786 GREEN RIVER RD A 203,956.15 11 2 Complete
20 1208 DOMINGUEZ RANCH RD 44,105.23 12 2 Complete
49 1208 DOMINGUEZ RANCH RD 590.00 12 2 Complete
60 1208 DOMINGUEZ RANCH RD 605.00 12 2 Complete
63 1250 CANYON CREST DR 917.00 12 2 Complete
71 1250 CANYON CREST DR 5,931.00 12 2 Complete
74 1250 CANYON CREST DR 148.00 12 2 Complete
81 1250 CANYON CREST DR 1,132.00 12 2 Complete
83 1250 CANYON CREST DR 1,303.00 12 2 Complete
93 1250 CANYON CREST DR 1,343.00 12 2 Complete
130 1588 SAN PONTE 1,522.00 12 2 Complete
3 825 HIGHLAND VIEW DR 572.00 12 2 Complete
4 825 HIGHLAND VIEW DR 1,097.00 12 2 Complete
289 1554 BALDY VIEW CI 4,486.00 3 3 Design $2.00 $8,972.00 259 1554 BALDY VIEW CI 19,752.22 3 3 Design $2.00 $39,504.44

Page 2394 of 2543 ends

Appendix C Capital Improvement Projects
City of Corona
Engineer’s Report LMD No. 84-2
Fiscal Year 2026
FID Meter Address Area (SF) Total Cond.

CIP
Year Status Est. Cost Total Cost
265 3692 ALVARADO CI 5,507.45 3 3 Design $2.00 $11,014.90 148 1151 SERFAS CLUB DR 103,390.70 5 3 Design $2.00 $206,781.40 254 1554 BALDY VIEW CI 2,271.90 5 3 Design $2.00 $4,543.80 82 3260 GREEN RIVER RD 96,772.78 5 3 Design $2.00 $193,545.56 266 3692 ALVARADO CI 25,898.84 5 3 Design $2.00 $51,797.69 283 4194 GREEN RIVER RD 17,311.00 5 3 Design $2.00 $34,622.00 273 4194 GREEN RIVER RD 11,079.13 5 3 Design $2.00 $22,158.25 196 1554 BALDY VIEW CI 41,577.72 6 3 Design $2.00 $83,155.43 253 1554 BALDY VIEW CI 12,320.77 6 3 Design $2.00 $24,641.53 25 2828 RIDGELINE DR 69,244.77 6 3 Design $2.00 $138,489.54 41 4194 GREEN RIVER RD 35,466.54 6 3 Design $2.00 $70,933.08 220 1554 BALDY VIEW CI 9,463.84 7 3 Design $2.00 $18,927.69 108 1151 SERFAS CLUB DR 51,632.54 8 3 Design $2.00 $103,265.08 244 1151 SERFAS CLUB DR 25,279.48 9 3 Design $2.00 $50,558.97 13 4194 GREEN RIVER RD 6,315.64 9 3 Design $2.00 $12,631.28 200 1554 BALDY VIEW CI 3,675.86 10 3 Design $2.00 $7,351.71 119 3692 ALVARADO CI 158,666.54 10 3 Design $2.00 $317,333.07 192 1554 BALDY VIEW CI 43,823.08 11 3 Design $2.00 $87,646.16 199 1554 BALDY VIEW CI 43,341.46 11 3 Design $2.00 $86,682.92 106 1151 SERFAS CLUB DR 9,776.00 12 3 Design $2.00 $19,552.00 151 3692 ALVARADO CI 441.00 12 3 Design $2.00 $882.00
10 4194 GREEN RIVER RD 1,113.00 12 3 Design $2.00 $2,226.00 11 4194 GREEN RIVER RD 626.00 12 3 Design $2.00 $1,252.00 227 1611 MONTANA RANCH RD 11,103.57 3 4
242 3787 GREEN RIVER RD A 19,404.22 3 4
282 2997 JUNIPER DR 17,518.00 4 4
109 1172 SAN LORENZO LN 1,425.00 5 4
120 1172 SAN LORENZO LN 334.00 6 4
225 1611 MONTANA RANCH RD 11,558.63 6 4
2 2997 JUNIPER DR 357,052.16 6 4
116 1172 SAN LORENZO LN 588.00 7 4
213 1611 MONTANA RANCH RD 33,894.98 7 4
226 1611 MONTANA RANCH RD 25,324.24 8 4
0 3787 GREEN RIVER RD A 309,614.97 9 4
241 3787 GREEN RIVER RD A 65,031.78 9 4
222 1611 MONTANA RANCH RD 7,270.63 11 4
252 1611 MONTANA RANCH RD 5,080.69 11 4
204 1611 MONTANA RANCH RD 4,886.00 12 4
212 1611 MONTANA RANCH RD 760.00 12 4
214 1611 MONTANA RANCH RD 1,147.32 12 4
248 1665 CALLE DEL ORO 11,003.78 3 5
245 1660 PASEO GRANDE 31,526.14 5 5
288 2950 WILDERNESS CI 6,266.00 5 5
75 2830 RIDGELINE DR 112,960.29 7 5
246 1660 PASEO GRANDE 20,423.09 8 5
218 1665 CALLE DEL ORO 57,816.52 8 5

Page 2395 of 2543 ends

Appendix C Capital Improvement Projects
City of Corona
Engineer’s Report LMD No. 84-2
Fiscal Year 2026
FID Meter Address Area (SF) Total Cond.

CIP
Year Status Est. Cost Total Cost
247 1660 PASEO GRANDE 45,442.36 9 5
249 1665 CALLE DEL ORO 6,542.60 9 5
250 1665 CALLE DEL ORO 8,781.19 9 5
209 2950 WILDERNESS CI 27,806.01 9 5
195 2950 WILDERNESS CI 8,268.92 10 5
191 1660 PASEO GRANDE 59,342.44 11 5
210 1660 PASEO GRANDE 8,434.00 11 5
240 1660 PASEO GRANDE 1,185.00 11 5
232 1665 CALLE DEL ORO 1,103.00 11 5
236 1665 CALLE DEL ORO 881.00 11 5
284 2830 RIDGELINE DR 95,493.00 11 5
243 2830 RIDGELINE DR 87,938.07 11 5
180 2950 WILDERNESS CI 1,237.00 11 5
181 2950 WILDERNESS CI 15,168.62 11 5
190 2950 WILDERNESS CI 971.00 11 5
193 2950 WILDERNESS CI 2,297.00 11 5
194 2950 WILDERNESS CI 805.00 11 5
197 2950 WILDERNESS CI 1,856.00 11 5
198 2950 WILDERNESS CI 5,293.29 11 5
205 2950 WILDERNESS CI 1,126.17 11 5
206 2950 WILDERNESS CI 551.00 11 5
207 2950 WILDERNESS CI 2,225.71 11 5
261 2950 WILDERNESS CI 3,905.08 11 5
262 2950 WILDERNESS CI 4,333.23 11 5
107 1120 SERFAS CLUB DR 8,777.66 5 6
46 1036 REDBERRY LN 20,949.71 6 6
55 1036 REDBERRY LN 22,407.43 6 6
258 2890 GREEN RIVER RD 104,312.22 7 6
35 1036 REDBERRY LN 1,974.18 9 6
38 1036 REDBERRY LN 55,676.26 9 6
275 1036 REDBERRY LN 1,511.61 9 6
276 1036 REDBERRY LN 13,609.38 9 6
285 2890 GREEN RIVER RD 22,386.00 9 6
125 2890 GREEN RIVER RD 172,423.94 9 6
175 2890 GREEN RIVER RD 27,728.94 9 6
39 1036 REDBERRY LN 2,522.00 11 6
73 1036 REDBERRY LN 841.00 11 6
103 1120 SERFAS CLUB DR 16,692.00 11 6
113 1120 SERFAS CLUB DR 23,054.69 11 6
144 1120 SERFAS CLUB DR 1,629.00 11 6
169 1120 SERFAS CLUB DR 1,214.00 11 6
168 2890 GREEN RIVER RD 227.00 11 6
257 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #A 78,232.68 7 7
264 3258 GREEN RIVER RD 8,010.89 8 7
80 3261 GREEN RIVER RD 44,342.45 8 7
28 3695 GREEN RIVER RD 50,706.07 8 7

Page 2396 of 2543 ends

Appendix C Capital Improvement Projects
City of Corona
Engineer’s Report LMD No. 84-2
Fiscal Year 2026
FID Meter Address Area (SF) Total Cond.

CIP
Year Status Est. Cost Total Cost
68 3258 GREEN RIVER RD 9,128.15 9 7
90 3258 GREEN RIVER RD 4,340.99 9 7
96 3258 GREEN RIVER RD 21,692.30 9 7
112 3258 GREEN RIVER RD 25,095.72 9 7
104 3261 GREEN RIVER RD 1,982.77 9 7
29 3695 GREEN RIVER RD 15,631.53 9 7
171 3950 SAN RAMON 2,229.99 9 7
178 3950 SAN RAMON 49,481.00 9 7
155 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #A 99,537.06 10 7
274 3695 GREEN RIVER RD 27,013.74 11 7
87 3258 GREEN RIVER RD 760.00 12 7
89 3258 GREEN RIVER RD 728.00 12 7
138 3258 GREEN RIVER RD 242.00 12 7
69 3261 GREEN RIVER RD 15,894.16 12 7
77 3261 GREEN RIVER RD 606.00 12 7
78 3261 GREEN RIVER RD 760.00 12 7
278 3261 GREEN RIVER RD 2,546.38 12 7
279 3261 GREEN RIVER RD 878.18 12 7
30 3695 GREEN RIVER RD 2,400.00 12 7
43 3695 GREEN RIVER RD 5,103.00 12 7
61 3695 GREEN RIVER RD 2,082.37 12 7
62 3695 GREEN RIVER RD 1,291.00 12 7
70 3695 GREEN RIVER RD 2,075.00 12 7
173 3950 SAN RAMON 1,729.00 12 7
174 3950 SAN RAMON 264.00 12 7
176 3950 SAN RAMON 327.00 12 7
177 3950 SAN RAMON 1,904.00 12 7
187 1598 MONTANA RANCH RD 156,015.03 7 8
217 1625 CALLE DEL ORO 40,851.44 7 8
251 1625 CALLE DEL ORO 23,496.80 8 8
48 1242 DOMINGUEZ RANCH RD 17,468.69 9 8
208 1598 MONTANA RANCH RD 29,304.08 9 8
219 1598 MONTANA RANCH RD 19,873.11 9 8
277 1598 MONTANA RANCH RD 112,046.11 9 8
64 2831 RIDGELINE DR 22,128.68 9 8
287 3059 DIAMOND VIEW CI 79,444.00 9 8
147 3059 DIAMOND VIEW CI 124,151.28 9 8
260 3059 DIAMOND VIEW CI 13,469.38 9 8
255 2598 GREEN RIVER RD 54,796.70 10 8
160 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 2,383.15 10 8
183 2598 GREEN RIVER RD 158,465.93 11 8
163 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 15,641.23 11 8
47 1242 DOMINGUEZ RANCH RD 537.00 12 8
211 1598 MONTANA RANCH RD 4,320.00 12 8
215 1625 CALLE DEL ORO 1,661.58 12 8
216 1625 CALLE DEL ORO 502.00 12 8

Page 2397 of 2543 ends

Appendix C Capital Improvement Projects
City of Corona
Engineer’s Report LMD No. 84-2
Fiscal Year 2026
FID Meter Address Area (SF) Total Cond.

CIP
Year Status Est. Cost Total Cost
221 1625 CALLE DEL ORO 1,847.00 12 8
231 1625 CALLE DEL ORO 523.00 12 8
95 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 5,516.00 12 8
111 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 3,214.00 12 8
131 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 171.00 12 8
134 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 764.00 12 8
137 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 377.00 12 8
142 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 1,074.00 12 8
153 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 1,051.00 12 8
159 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 632.00 12 8
162 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 4,262.00 12 8
172 2820 GREEN RIVER RD #B 2,768.00 12 8
56 2831 RIDGELINE DR 2,353.00 12 8
184 3059 DIAMOND VIEW CI 304.00 12 8
22 975 HIGHLAND VIEW DR 2,058.27 6 9
101 1250 CANYON CREST DR 1,600.00 9 9
51 1250 CANYON CREST DR 278,585.04 9 9
98 1251 CANYON CREST DR 59,353.27 9 9
203 2210 GREEN RIVER RD 26,668.80 9 9
234 2210 GREEN RIVER RD 10,908.72 9 9
256 2210 GREEN RIVER RD 7,268.20 9 9
19 975 HIGHLAND VIEW DR 10,521.92 9 9
92 1251 CANYON CREST DR 21,612.06 11 9
235 2210 GREEN RIVER RD 38,820.39 11 9
239 2210 GREEN RIVER RD 46,560.87 11 9
67 1251 CANYON CREST DR 1,163.00 12 9
79 1251 CANYON CREST DR 223.00 12 9
84 1251 CANYON CREST DR 547.00 12 9
85 1251 CANYON CREST DR 11,034.17 12 9
263 1251 CANYON CREST DR 12,872.17 12 9
201 2210 GREEN RIVER RD 1,260.00 12 9
202 2210 GREEN RIVER RD 4,306.00 12 9
223 2210 GREEN RIVER RD 730.00 12 9
224 2210 GREEN RIVER RD 1,032.00 12 9
230 2210 GREEN RIVER RD 1,836.82 12 9
18 975 HIGHLAND VIEW DR 807.00 12 9
24 975 HIGHLAND VIEW DR 1,673.00 12 9
26 975 HIGHLAND VIEW DR 4,718.00 12 9
186 2451 GREEN RIVER RD 1,480.78 9 10
33 3787 GREEN RIVER RD B 2,169.06 9 10
94 1143 RIDGELINE DR 1,402.85 10 10
237 2081 GREEN RIVER RD 7,021.70 11 10
40 3005 RIDGELINE DR 1,271.33 11 10
9 3786 GREEN RIVER RD B 19,465.56 11 10
17 3786 GREEN RIVER RD B 24,543.92 11 10
50 318.00 12 10

Page 2398 of 2543 ends

Appendix C Capital Improvement Projects
City of Corona
Engineer’s Report LMD No. 84-2
Fiscal Year 2026
FID Meter Address Area (SF) Total Cond.

CIP
Year Status Est. Cost Total Cost
139 771.00 12 10
99 1143 RIDGELINE DR 3,261.00 12 10
127 1143 RIDGELINE DR 611.00 12 10
233 2081 GREEN RIVER RD 5,221.00 12 10
182 2451 GREEN RIVER RD 2,118.00 12 10
185 2451 GREEN RIVER RD 1,603.00 12 10
188 2451 GREEN RIVER RD 14,546.00 12 10
189 2451 GREEN RIVER RD 8,496.00 12 10
228 2451 GREEN RIVER RD 648.00 12 10
229 2451 GREEN RIVER RD 1,928.00 12 10
238 2451 GREEN RIVER RD 1,635.00 12 10
91 2817 GREEN RIVER RD 4,367.00 12 10
105 2817 GREEN RIVER RD 723.00 12 10
110 2817 GREEN RIVER RD 1,243.00 12 10
117 2817 GREEN RIVER RD 424.00 12 10
123 2817 GREEN RIVER RD 169.00 12 10
124 2817 GREEN RIVER RD 3,799.00 12 10
161 2817 GREEN RIVER RD 1,725.00 12 10
170 2817 GREEN RIVER RD 1,587.00 12 10
179 2817 GREEN RIVER RD 447.00 12 10
27 2825 RIDGELINE DR 5,242.00 12 10
31 2825 RIDGELINE DR 2,442.00 12 10
32 2825 RIDGELINE DR 3,374.00 12 10
34 2825 RIDGELINE DR 611.00 12 10
37 2825 RIDGELINE DR 6,887.00 12 10
42 2825 RIDGELINE DR 9,051.00 12 10
45 2825 RIDGELINE DR 3,773.00 12 10
54 2825 RIDGELINE DR 5,146.00 12 10
57 2825 RIDGELINE DR 6,883.00 12 10
72 2825 RIDGELINE DR 773.00 12 10
100 2825 RIDGELINE DR 2,399.00 12 10
122 2825 RIDGELINE DR 42.00 12 10
126 2825 RIDGELINE DR 518.00 12 10
128 2825 RIDGELINE DR 719.00 12 10
132 2825 RIDGELINE DR 9.00 12 10
135 2825 RIDGELINE DR 9.00 12 10
136 2825 RIDGELINE DR 329.00 12 10
140 2825 RIDGELINE DR 9.00 12 10
143 2825 RIDGELINE DR 9.00 12 10
145 2825 RIDGELINE DR 936.00 12 10
146 2825 RIDGELINE DR 9.00 12 10
149 2825 RIDGELINE DR 9.00 12 10
152 2825 RIDGELINE DR 9.00 12 10
154 2825 RIDGELINE DR 9.00 12 10
156 2825 RIDGELINE DR 411.00 12 10
157 2825 RIDGELINE DR 9.00 12 10

Page 2399 of 2543 ends

Appendix C Capital Improvement Projects
City of Corona
Engineer’s Report LMD No. 84-2
Fiscal Year 2026
FID Meter Address Area (SF) Total Cond.

CIP
Year Status Est. Cost Total Cost
158 2825 RIDGELINE DR 9.00 12 10
36 3005 RIDGELINE DR 7,243.00 12 10
6 3786 GREEN RIVER RD B 16,648.00 12 10
58 3786 GREEN RIVER RD B 282.00 12 10
59 3786 GREEN RIVER RD B 725.00 12 10
66 3786 GREEN RIVER RD B 2,974.00 12 10
88 3786 GREEN RIVER RD B 1,702.00 12 10
5 3787 GREEN RIVER RD B 14,569.00 12 10
8 3787 GREEN RIVER RD B 12,014.00 12 10
15 3787 GREEN RIVER RD B 3,190.00 12 10
23 3787 GREEN RIVER RD B 5,271.00 12 10
12 4192 GREEN RIVER RD 684.00 12 10
14 4192 GREEN RIVER RD 4,667.00 12 10
16 4192 GREEN RIVER RD 1,792.00 12 10

Page 2400 of 2543 ends

Page 2401 of 2543 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-045

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE
DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT WITHIN ZONE 20 OF
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 84-2 FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2026

WHEREAS, on May 7, 2025, the City Council of the City of Corona (the “City Council”) adopted Resolution No. 2025-034, a resolution of intention pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code, which among other things, scheduled a public hearing on the levy and collection of assessments on the lots and parcels of the assessable property within Zone 20 of Landscape Maintenance District No. 84-2 (the “District”) for Fiscal Year 2026 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) for 6:30 p.m. on June 18, 2025, in the City Council Chambers of the City of Corona, at 400 South Vicentia Avenue, Corona, California; and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was duly published as required by Sections 22552 and 22553 of said Act; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place of said hearing, as set forth in said resolution of intention, the City Council held the hearing and afforded all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and considered all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested persons, and at the conclusion of said hearing determined that a majority protest, to wit: written protests filed and not withdrawn by property owners owning more than 50 percent of the area of assessable land within the District, had not been received.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Findings and Approval of Final Report. The City Council find that:
(a) The foregoing recitals are true and correct;
(b) Compliance has been maintained with all of the applicable requirements of the Act;
(c) A majority protest to the levy and collection of the proposed assessment has not been filed;
(d) The City Council may therefore proceed to confirm the boundary and assessment for the District for Fiscal Year 2026, and order levy and collection of the assessment; (e) The assessment proposed to be levied on the lots and parcels of assessable property within the District for the maintenance and servicing of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities during Fiscal Year 2026, as contained in the Final Annual Engineer’s Report

Page 2402 of 2543 ends

2 as it pertains to Zone 20, prepared by Spicer Consulting Group, LLC on file with the City Clerk (the “Report”), are based on the proportionate special benefit derived by such lots and parcels from the availability of such public landscaping and appurtenant facilities; (f) The proportionate special benefit derived by each such lot or parcel has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance and servicing of such public landscaping and appurtenant facilities;
(g) Such assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such lot and parcel;
(h) Such assessments will not be increased over the amounts previously approved by the electors of the District or as otherwise permitted by the Act and Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and
(i) Based on the foregoing and the full record before the City Council, the Report as whole and each part thereof are finally approved and confirmed.

SECTION 2. Levy of Assessment. Pursuant to Section 22631 of the Streets and Highways Code, the adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the maintenance and servicing of public landscaping and appurtenant facilities within the District during Fiscal Year 2026, as contained in the Report, and such assessment is hereby levied. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution together with the diagram and assessment contained in the Report with the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, who, pursuant to Section 22645 of the Streets and Highways Code, shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the said assessment.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 2025.

Mayor of the City of Corona, California
ATTEST:

City Clerk of the City of Corona, California

Page 2403 of 2543 ends

3 CERTIFICATION
I, Sylvia Edwards, City Clerk of the City of Corona, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Corona, California, at its regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Corona, California, this 18th day of June, 2025.

City Clerk of the City of Corona, California
[SEAL]

Page 2404 of 2543 ends

DATE: 06/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Planning and Development Department
2025-234

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-080 ESTABLISHING AN APPLICATION FEE FOR AN OUTDOOR

SIDEWALK DINING PERMIT AND OUTDOOR RETAIL KIOSK PERMIT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the City Council to approve an application fee for an outdoor sidewalk dining permit, and outdoor retail kiosk permit. Both permits were established by the Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan. According to the specific plan, an application fee for the permits shall be established by resolution of the City Council. The fee covers the city’s processing time for the issuance of the permits.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council adopt Resolution 2025-080 establishing an application fee for an outdoor sidewalk dining permit and outdoor retail kiosk permit, and to update the Citywide Master Fee Recovery Schedule to include the new applications fees.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

The Downtown Revitalization Specific Plan was comprehensively amended and adopted by the City Council on December 18, 2024. The plan allows for outdoor sidewalk dining within the city’s right-of-way and outdoor retail kiosks on private property. Both uses are allowed within the Downtown commercial districts with the approval of a permit. The permit fee covers the city’s processing time for the issuance of the permit and is required to be established by the adoption of a resolution of the City Council, which is the reason for Resolution 2025-080.

Page 2405 of 2543 ends

ANALYSIS:

The outdoor sidewalk dining permit and outdoor retail kiosk permit are expected to be reviewed and issued within three days of a permit application submitted to the city. The permit fee was evaluated based on the review and processing time by staff. The following is the proposed fee for both permits.

Permit Fee
Outdoor Sidewalk Dining Permit $307
Outdoor Retail Kiosk Permit $167
FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Fees shall become effective 60 days after City Council’s approval (August 17, 2025). The establishment of the permit fees will not have a negative fiscal impact on the General Fund. The estimated revenue increase of establishing outdoor sidewalk dining permits and outdoor retail kiosk permits is unknown at this time and will depend on the number of permit applications submitted to the city.

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:

A public hearing notice on the proposed fees was advertised in the Sentinel Weekly and published on June 6, 2025, meeting the minimum notice of 10 days prior to the public hearing.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This Resolution is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the commonsense rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This Resolution simply adopts a fee for permit applications and there is no possibility that adopting this Resolution will have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no environmental analysis is required.

PREPARED BY: JOANNE COLETTA, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Resolution 2025-080

Page 2406 of 2543 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-080

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CORONA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN

APPLICATION FEE FOR AN OUTDOOR SIDEWALK

DINING PERMIT AND OUTDOOR RETAIL KIOSK
PERMIT.

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Downtown Corona Revitalization Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”) Section 3.8.1.C(1), a ministerial permit is required for a business engaging in outdoor sidewalk dining; and
WHEREAS, Specific Plan Section 3.8.1.C(2) provides that the application fee for outdoor sidewalk dining permits shall be established by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Specific Plan Section 3.8.6.D(1), a ministerial permit is required for any person engaging in outdoor retail kiosk activities; and WHEREAS, Specific Plan Section 3.8.6.D(1) provides that the application fee for outdoor retail kiosk permits shall be established by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish the fees for applications for outdoor sidewalk dining permits and outdoor retail kiosk permits.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Findings. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted as findings in support of this Resolution.

SECTION 2. Outdoor Sidewalk Dining Permit Fee. There is hereby established and adopted a fee of Three Hundred Seven Dollars ($307) for application of an outdoor sidewalk dining permit required by Section 3.8.1.C(1) of the Downtown Corona Revitalization Specific Plan. The City Council finds and determines that this fee does not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of processing and issuing an outdoor sidewalk dining permit. This fee shall be included in the City’s annual fee study and may be amended by resolution of the City Council.

SECTION 3. Outdoor Retail Kiosk Permit Fee. There is hereby established and adopted a fee of One Hundred Sixty-Seven Dollars ($167) for application of an outdoor retail kiosk permit required by Section 3.8.6.D(1) of the Downtown Corona Revitalization Specific Plan. The City Council finds and determines that this fee does not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of processing and issuing an outdoor retail kiosk permit. This fee shall be included in the City’s annual fee study and may be amended by resolution of the City Council.

Page 2407 of 2543 ends

SECTION 4 CEQA Findings. This Resolution is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the common sense rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This Resolution simply adopts a fee for permit applications and there is no possibility that adopting this Resolution will have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no environmental analysis is required.

SECTION 5. Effective Date. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest thereto, and this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force on the date of its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June 2025. _________________________________
Mayor of the City of Corona, California
ATTEST:
___________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Corona, California

Page 2408 of 2543 ends

CERTIFICATION
I, Sylvia Edwards, City Clerk of the City of Corona, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Corona, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Corona, California this 18th day of June, 2025. ____________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Corona, California
[SEAL]

Page 2409 of 2543 ends

DATE: 06/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Community Services Department
2025-262

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

ADOPTION OF THE SKYLINE AREA MASTER PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the City Council to adopt the Skyline Area Masterplan. The plan was developed with the vision to preserve 292 acres of the Skyline area in its natural state, while adding minimal amenities to enhance public access, enjoyment, and visitor experience. The plan was developed with extensive community input and outlines a strategy for maintaining the meadow, nearby trails, and connections to regional trail systems, including access to the Cleveland National Forest RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council review and adopt the Skyline Area Masterplan.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

Skyline is the most frequented hiking destination in the City of Corona and is a public gateway into the Cleveland National Forest. The Skyline Area Master Plan (the “Plan”) focuses on the 292 acres of land owned by the City of Corona, including the meadow south of Skyline Drive and the hillside area located between Skyline Drive and Foothill Parkway.

Historically, the Skyline area was an agricultural preserve in the County of Riverside. It was annexed into the City of Corona during the development of the Orchard Glen housing community to the north. In 2020, a housing development was proposed on 39.16 acres

Page 2410 of 2543 ends

of the meadow area, prompting community concern as it would have blocked public access to the trails that led to the Cleveland National Forest and generated a significant amount of vehicular traffic. In response, the City purchased all 292 acres of the Skyline area in December 2020.

On July 3, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-076 to reaffirm the City’s intent to preserve the land in its natural state, with allowances for minor amenities such as pedestrian bridges, seating, shade structures, and signage.

ANALYSIS:

Skyline Drive and the surrounding areas are widely used by hikers and mountain bikers but lack standard amenities. Current features are limited to trailheads along Foothill Parkway and Burrero Way.

Developing the Plan included conducting an inventory of existing trails in the Skyline area, administering a balanced citywide survey to identify desired amenities, and participating in community outreach events to assess residents’ priorities for the Skyline area. This approach helped ensure that the Plan represents the interests of the entire City and is shaped by community input and shared values.

The City conducted an online citywide survey from June 4 to August 30, 2024, to gauge residents’ perceptions of the Skyline area, understand their priorities, and identify opportunities for improvement. Survey respondents were invited to participate in one of three ways: 1) an open survey accessible via QR code shared on flyers; 2) a randomly sampled survey sent to 1,000 residents; and 3) a targeted survey sent to all 108 households in the Orchard Glen neighborhood. A total of 1,195 participants completed the survey, and a summary of their responses is provided in the Plan.

Recommendations provided in the Plan are community-driven and are derived from comments received from the survey, recommendations from the Trails Masterplan, and meetings with trail user groups and outreach events. Recommendations are divided into three sections: 1) Improvements, 2) Maintenance & Fire Prevention, and 3) Policies & Procedures.

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:

On June 10, 2025, the Parks and Recreation Commission received an update on the Skyline Area Master Plan. The Commission unanimously recommended that the Plan be adopted by the City Council.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no financial impact associated with the adoption of the Skyline Area Masterplan.

The individual projects identified within The Plan have estimated cost impacts listed in the implementation plan section. These projects will be brought before the City Council for consideration during the annual budget process and when the projects are being considered for approval.

Page 2411 of 2543 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This action is for the adoption of the Skyline Masterplan. Therefore, no environmental analysis is required PREPARED BY: BRETT DAWSON, TRAILS PLANNER & MOSES CORTEZ, PARKS

AND TRAILS MANAGER
REVIEWED BY: DONNA FINCH, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Skyline Master Plan

2. Exhibit 2 – Skyline Master Plan Appendix

3. Exhibit 3 - Presentation

Page 2412 of 2543 ends

Moses Cortez
Parks and Trails Manager

Page 2413 of 2543 ends

That the City Council adopt the Skyline Area
Master Plan.

Page 2414 of 2543 ends

• The Vision of the Skyline Area Master Plan (“The Plan”) is to preserve the 292 acres of the Skyline area in a natural state for the benefit of current and future generations. • The Plan is organized into five main sections:

1. Vision and Framework

2. Background and History

3. Planning Process

4. Recommendations

5. Implementation Plan

Page 2415 of 2543 ends

• Comprised of 292 acres of land on the south-west
border of Corona
• Most popular hiking destination in Corona and a
gateway into the Cleveland National Forest
• Area originally planned for housing:
• 63 single-family homes proposed
• Blocked public access to trails
• The City purchased the land in 2020 to protect
access and open space
• City Council adopted a Resolution on July 3, 2024,
to reaffirm the City’s intent to preserve Skyline in its natural state with minor amenities

Page 2416 of 2543 ends

• The Plan development process included:
• Inventory of existing trails
• Citywide survey on desired amenities
• Outreach events and meetings to discuss
residents’ priorities for Skyline
• Ensures The Plan represents the interests of the
entire city and is shaped by community input
and shared values

Page 2417 of 2543 ends

• Conducted July 4 – August 30, 2024
• Survey available in one of three ways:

1. Open Participation

2. Random Sample

3. Orchard Glen Residents
• 1,195 total participants completed the survey.
• Restrooms were the most desired feature,
followed by trail maps, water fountain, and
trail signage.

Page 2418 of 2543 ends

• Convenient and easily accessible
walking circuits
• Remain in natural state
• Serve as fire breaks

Page 2419 of 2543 ends

• Water awareness/hydration
• Rattlesnake safety
• Pack in/Pack out
• No Radios
• Dog waste
• Emergency Info
• Trail name
• Trail difficulty
• What is/not permitted
• Be aware of hikers/bikers
Add a picture of trail signage here

Page 2420 of 2543 ends

• Will be available on all Trailhead Kiosks for a consistent trail user experience • QR Code displays this Page 2421 of 2543 map on mobile devices • Outlines ongoing maintenance functions
throughout the year.
• Provides objective guidelines for trail and
open space uses.
• Ensures maintenance is performed in
accordance with best practices and
safety.
• Outlines opportunities for residents to give
back to the Skyline Open space and to
connect with staff and other trail users.
 Note: The Skyline Plan aligns with City’s General Plan Page 2422 of 2543 • Establish Trail Volunteers
• Area Map
• Safety Patrols
• Meadow Seating
• Trash Cans and Dog Bag Station
• Trails Day
• Skyline Bridge
• Trailhead Signage
• Maintenance Plan
• Shade Trees
• Trail Circuits
• Trail Signage
• Improved Security on Foothill
• Restroom and Water Fountain
• Seating
• Refurbish Bridges
• Easier Trails

Page 2423 of 2543 ends

1. Explore Volunteer Opportunities

2. Plan Projects for Future Fiscal Years

3. Pursue Grant Opportunities

Page 2424 of 2543 ends

That the Council adopt the Skyline Area
Master Plan.

Page 2425 of 2543 ends

Page 2426 of 2543 ends

2 Acknowledgements
City Council
Jim Steiner, Mayor
Jacque Casillas, Vice Mayor
Tom Richins, Council Member
Tony Daddario, Council Member
Wes Speake, Council Member
Parks and Recreation Commission
Stacie Bass, Chair
Robert Boggs Ed.D., Vice Chair
Thomas Munoz, Commissioner
Matt Olsen, Commissioner
Justin McBride, Commissioner
City Staff
Jacob Ellis, City Manager
Justin Tucker, Assistant City Manager
Donna Finch, Community Services Director
Moses Cortez, Parks and Trails Manager
Brett Dawson, Trails Planner
Cindy Solis, Public Information Officer
Jonathan Vellanoweth, GIS Analyst

Page 2427 of 2543 ends

3 Table of Contents

1.0 Vision and Framework.......................................................................................................... 4

2.0 Background and History....................................................................................................... 4

2.1 Property Annexation ......................................................................................................... 7

2.2 Corona Strategic Plan....................................................................................................... 8

2.3. 2020-2040 Corona General Plan .................................................................................... 8

2.4 Parks and Recreation Master Plan ................................................................................... 9

2.5 Trails Master Plan........................................................................................................... 10

2.6 Skyline Resolution .......................................................................................................... 10

3.0 Planning Process ................................................................................................................11

3.1 Skyline Trail Inventory......................................................................................................11

3.2 Survey ............................................................................................................................ 12

3.3 Outreach to User Groups................................................................................................ 17

4.0 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 18

4.1 Improvements................................................................................................................. 19

4.2 Maintenance and Fire Prevention ................................................................................... 22

4.3 Policies and Practices..................................................................................................... 22

5.0 Implementation Plan .......................................................................................................... 23

Page 2428 of 2543 ends

4 1.0 Vision and Framework
The Skyline Area Master Plan (“the Plan”) is a living document shaped by community input and shared values. The Plan's vision is to preserve the 292 acres of the Skyline area in its natural state for the benefit of current and future generations while providing a few simple amenities to enhance public enjoyment, accessibility, and visitor experience.

The Plan also establishes a strategic approach for the upkeep and enhancement of the meadow, nearby trails, and connections to regional trail systems, including access to the Cleveland National Forest. The Plan is organized into five main sections:

1. The Vision and Framework section outlines the goals and structure of the plan.

2. The Background and History section details the acquisition and development of the Skyline area over time.

3. The Planning Process section discusses the procedures for developing the Plan and methods of obtaining information to form recommendations.

4. The Recommendations section outlines proposed improvements for the area, maintenance and fire prevention standards, and policies and procedures to ensure for the long-term care of the area.

5. The Implementation Plan section details the proposed projects for the Skyline area over the next three-year period.

2.0 Background and History
The Skyline Area is comprised of approximately 292 acres of land, situated on the southernwesterly border of Corona, California, between Foothill Pkwy. and the Cleveland National Forest (Figure 1.).

Skyline is the city’s most popular hiking destination and is readily accessible to the public. The area is surrounded by nature and is a gateway for hikers and mountain bikers to access the Cleveland National Forest.

Page 2429 of 2543 ends

5 Figure 1. Area map
The Plan focuses on the land owned by the City of Corona, (Figures 2 and 3) which is comprised of the meadow south of Skyline Drive and the hillside area located between Skyline Drive and Foothill Parkway. Surrounded by hillsides and etched with canyons, this area provides stunning views from multiple vantage points and is celebrated for its natural beauty.

Page 2430 of 2543 ends

6 Figure 2. Subject Property
Figure 3. Skyline Meadow

Page 2431 of 2543 ends

7 2.1 Property Annexation
The Skyline area was historically designated as an agricultural preserve in the County of Riverside and contained two dwellings with an on-site earthen reservoir for agricultural irrigation purposes.

Two natural drainage courses are situated through and adjacent to the site (Annexation 105). The zoning included Open Space on the easternmost 20.85 acres of the site, and Single Family Residential with minimum 9,600 square foot lots on the remaining 39.16 acres. The pre-zoning of the site was a prerequisite for LAFCO to consider the annexation to the City. At the same time, the property to the north of Skyline Drive, known as Orchard Glen, was being developed with single family homes on minimum 7,200 square foot lots.

In 2020, Knowlton Communities proposed a housing development on 39.16 acres of the Skyline meadow area that consisted of 63 single-family homes, with 20.85 acres of the meadow remaining as open space. This project caused concern in the community. It would have blocked public access to the trails that led to the Cleveland National Forest and generated a significant amount of vehicular traffic through the adjacent Orchard Glen neighborhood.

On December 2, 2020, the City Council announced the City’s purchase of 292 acres in the Skyline area, which included the area proposed for development by Knowlton Communities. Per the City’s Press Release, “With this once in a lifetime legacy project, Corona will nearly double its open space, adding to the current 391 acres of open land.” The land acquisition was paid for with $2.5 million in park development funds, and $4.14 million from the General Fund and consisted of three parcels:

APN Size (acres)
275-090-013 62.36
275-070-010 228
275-090-011 1.64 Skyline Dr. dedication
This acquisition helped raise the City’s level of service from 2.5 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents to over 4 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, surpassing the standard set in the 2020 Corona General Plan of 3 acres of parkland per 1000 residents. Furthermore, the acquisition improved resident access to parkland and amenities in this quadrant of the City, which has lower access to these services than other areas of the City.

While the City owns the meadow and adjacent land, access to and maintenance of the Skyline area involves coordination with other government agencies with their respective policies and procedures. The United States Forest Service (USFS) maintains the gate on Skyline Drive, Hagador Canyon Trail, Tin Mine Canyon Trail, and most of the land to the west and South of the City’s property. The Riverside County Transportation Department (RCTD) is responsible for maintaining Skyline Drive (as a road) from the Corona boundary to the Orange County line.

Most visitors to the Skyline area use Skyline drive for hiking and biking, but RCTD maintains it a limited-access road to be used by USFS maintenance vehicles and easement owners.

Page 2432 of 2543 ends

8 2.2 Corona Strategic Plan
The 2021-2026 City of Corona Strategic Plan sets forth a vision for Corona to be a safe, vibrant, and family-friendly community. The Strategic Plan contains two recommended actions for the Skyline area under the goal of Sound Infrastructure: 1) Develop a plan for the use of the newly acquired [Skyline] wilderness space that fosters outdoor recreation activities, in addition to creating formal trailheads; and 2) Create better parking facilities that provide security for vehicles left while residents hike or play. This Plan addresses both issues with recommendations based on community outreach and stakeholder input to improve the Skyline .

2.3. 2020-2040 Corona General Plan

Page 2433 of 2543 ends

9 Figure 4. General Plan Zoning
The 2020-2040 Corona General Plan (General Plan) is a comprehensive planning and land use document for the City of Corona. The General Plan originally designated the Skyline area as part of Annexation 105, which annexed 60.01 acres from Riverside County to the City of Corona. In April 2006, a General Plan Amendment converted 39.16 acres of the land from a Rural Residential to Low Density Residential (LDR) land use designation, and the remaining 20.85 acres was converted to Open Space/General (OS/G). Along with the General Plan Amendment was a Change of Zone, which allowed for parkland use in this area.

The General Plan’s Vision and Land Use Policies that apply to this Plan are listed in Appendix A.

2.4 Parks and Recreation Master Plan
The Parks and Master Plan (PRMP), adopted in 2024, provides a guide for the provision, improvement, maintenance, and funding of parks, recreation facilities, and programs in the City of Corona. The PRMP divides Corona into four quadrants, with Ontario Ave. and Main Street primarily serving as the dividing lines between each quadrant. The Skyline area is located within Quadrant 4.

The Quimby Act encourages a minimum of 3 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents.

Correspondingly, the 2020-2040 Corona General Plan establishes the same level of service (LOS) standard. Without the Skyline area, Corona’s LOS is 2.42. However, with the acquisition of the 292 acres of the Skyline area, along with other undeveloped parkland, Corona’s LOS exceeds the General Plan standard with 4.0 acres per 1,000 residents.

Page 2434 of 2543 ends

10 The PRMP discusses the Skyline Area and the need to “Create a plan that identifies the types of improvements and amenities to include at Skyline, while stewarding and protecting the site’s natural resources. The plan will be developed by city staff and include public engagement and surveying with Corona residents and the neighboring community. Specific features of the site and project costs will be dependent on the outcome of the planning process.”

2.5 Trails Master Plan
The Trails Master Plan (TMP), approved in February 2024, is a comprehensive planning document that creates a framework to guide the development and access to trails in the City of Corona. The TMP reviewed existing trails and identified new opportunities to build and incorporate off street active transportation connections throughout Corona. It provides policy recommendations, prioritized projects, and a 10-year implementation plan.

The development of the TMP included an origin and destination analysis for the Skyline area, which showed that, in 2023, 74% of total trips to/from the Skyline Drive trailhead occurred between Corona or neighboring cities such as Norco, Eastvale and Riverside. 61% of the total trips occurred within Corona, 2% to/from Norco, 4% to/from Eastvale, and 7% to/from Riverside. The Skyline Drive Trailhead had the highest percentage of activity (56%) during the winter season (January-March), and the majority of trail users (53%) accessed the trailhead during the weekends and in the morning between 6 am and 12 pm. Despite the regional draw of the Skyline Drive trailhead, the data showed that majority of the trail users are local residents who live in and around Corona and use the trail multiple times per week.

The TMP identified 5 high priority trail projects in Corona, with Skyline Drive listed as the #3 project in the implementation plan. The Skyline Drive project highlights the need for new standard trailhead amenities, including shade, benches, trashcans, water fountain, bike repair station and kiosk/signage.

During outreach for the TMP, many community members commented that the Skyline Trail tends to be the most crowded trail in Corona, and that parking is difficult in this area. Community members expressed a desire for designated parking for the trail and indicated they would like to see Skyline better maintained, with more trash facilities, regular clean-ups, and amenities such as restrooms at the trailhead.

The TMP also highlighted the opportunity for the Skyline area to formalize access to the Hagador Canyon and Tin Mine Canyon Trails, both of which branch off from the Skyline Trail. To support this, the TMP recommends improving the pedestrian bridge to Hagador from the trail entrance on Skyline Drive.

2.6 Skyline Resolution
On July 3, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-076 to reaffirm the City’s original intent for the Skyline area. The Resolution declares the Council’s desire to preserve the 292 acres of the Skyline Trail Area in its natural state, with allowances for minor amenities to enhance public enjoyment and accessibility. It states that these minor amenities may include, but are not limited to, pedestrian bridges, seating, shade structures, trail markers, and signage.

Page 2435 of 2543 ends

11 3.0 Planning Process
The process to develop the Skyline Area Master Plan included conducting an inventory of existing trails in the Skyline area, administering a balanced citywide survey to identify desired amenities, and participating in several outreach events to discuss residents’ priorities for the Skyline area.

This approach helped ensure the Plan represents the interests of the entire city and is shaped by community input and shared values.

3.1 Skyline Trail Inventory
Figure 5. Major Trails in Skyline Area.

A comprehensive assessment and documentation process was conducted for all existing trails within the Skyline area. This included a review of the TMP and Trails Inventory, on-site visits, public outreach, collaboration with volunteers and trail enthusiasts, and a review of publicly available data from popular trail user platforms such as Strava, ESRI Survey 123, Ride with GPA, Avenza Maps, and AllTrails. This information was compiled into a detailed GIS map, which is shown in Figure 5. The map provides essential trail information, including trail locations and difficulty levels.

The Skyline area contains several trails of varying styles and uses. The primary and most popular route is Skyline Drive, which is a dirt road, maintained by Riverside County, that connects to the Cleveland National Forest (CNF) network. There are two official CNF hiking trails: Hagador

Page 2436 of 2543 ends

12 Canyon, and Tin Mine Canyon. The meadow area has a patchwork of trails through the center and a main trail that circumnavigates the perimeter. The majority of the trails throughout the hills were created from fire breaks (e.g. Skinsuit Trail) or by the mountain bike community (e.g. Block, Troy Lee).

Skyline Drive and the surrounding area is widely used but lacks standard amenities. The amenities that do exist are located primarily at access points, either along Foothill Parkway (water fountain, trashcans, wayfinding signage) or at Burrero way (bike repair station, informational kiosk, accessible parking, trashcan).

This area is very popular among the hiking and mountain biking communities because it is easily accessible and has a large number of trails. The best marked trails are Tin Mine and Hagador , which are primarily used for hiking. There are approximately 20 single-track trails that were developed over time and are well documented online (e.g., Strava) but do not have physical wayfinding markers. Many of them are very steep and have blind turns, which creates safety concerns and conflicts with hikers and mountain bikers. As displayed in Figure 5, most of the trails have the IMBA rating of double black diamond or “Extremely Difficult”. While the Skyline area is frequented by users for these difficult trails, easier trails are less well-known or developed.

There are various features in the area that are widely utilized but could be improved to increase accessibility while retaining the natural character of the area. For example, in order to get to the Hagador Canyon trailhead or the meadow, visitors must either cross a steep wash or cross a makeshift log bridge. Certain trails, such as the unnamed trail accessing the land directly to the east of the meadow, become exceedingly steep and require hikers to climb on all fours to reach the top. While easy walking circuits exist in the meadow area, none are marked with wayfinding signage for route distance or direction.

3.2 Survey
The City conducted an online survey from July 4 to August 30, 2024, to gauge residents’ perceptions of the Skyline area, understand their priorities, and identify opportunities for improvement. In order to balance the needs and feedback of all Corona residents, survey respondents were invited to participate in the survey in one of three ways:

1. Open Participation: This survey method allowed any interested individual to participate by utilizing a http link and QR code that directed potential respondents to the survey site.

To maximize engagement, the survey was advertised a variety of ways, including on the City’s website, through social media, in the Community Services Insider and Corona Connection, through flyers distributed at local stores, and at city events such as the Summer Concert Series and popup events at the Skyline Drive trailhead.

2. Random Sample: This method distributed the survey to a random sample of 1,000 Corona residents drawn from a list of citywide addresses of single-family and multi-family households with known email addresses. The survey was provided in an email invitation to each resident and was verified to be reasonably geographically distributed throughout the city prior to distribution.

3. Orchard Glen Residents: Due to their proximity to the Skyline area, the perceptions of the Orchard Glen residents were of particular interest as their neighborhood is directly

Page 2437 of 2543 ends

13 adjacent to the Skyline meadow. All 108 households from the Orchard Glen neighborhood were emailed an invitation to participate in the survey.

Figure 6. Skyline Area survey.

Respondents were provided a brief introduction to the survey (Figure 6.) and asked four questions about the Skyline Area:

1. What do you love about Skyline?

2. How would you improve Skyline?

3.What amenities would make Skyline better?

4.Is there anything else you would like to add?
A total of 1,195 participants completed the survey, of those 1,195 responses, 67 were from the random sample, and 20 from Orchard Glen completed the survey. A summary of the responses is provided below, and a more extensive breakdown of the survey results is provided in Appendix B.

What do you love about Skyline?
The first question on the survey was “What do you love about Skyline?” and included an open text box that allowed respondents to write in whatever response they wanted. Figure 7 (below) is a word cloud for the responses, with the larger font representing the most frequently used words.

Page 2438 of 2543 ends

14 Figure 7. Word cloud with most frequent words for “What do you love about Skyline?” 261 responses stated that Nature and Open Space were what they loved the most. The variety of trails, hiking and bicycling were the next most frequently mentioned responses, with 247 comments. The fact that it is close by, and you can easily get access to nature from your home, was third with 221 comments. The great views, scenery and natural beauty were mentioned fourth with 180 comments. Other items that were commonly mentioned were: exercise and variety in skill levels (70), cleanliness (34), peace and quiet (34), easily accessible and easy for strollers (28), open to the public (17), please leave it natural (19), and easy access to the forest (13).

When analyzed separately, the random sample of citizens throughout the city most frequently noted nature and open spaces (25), with being close by as second (10) most common response.

The respondents from Orchard Glen indicated nature and open spaces as what they love (9) with the variety of trails, hiking, and biking as second (3).

How would you improve Skyline?
The second question on the survey was “How would you improve Skyline?” Respondents were provided an open text box and allowed to write whatever response they wanted. Figure 8 (below) is the word cloud for all of the responses, with the larger font representing the most frequently used words.

Figure 8. Word cloud, most frequent words for “How would you improve Skyline?” Safe parking and enhanced security measures, including patrols, signage, and cameras, were highlighted as concerns (137). Additional parking (118), shade (117), seating (93), and water

Page 2439 of 2543 ends

15 fountains (85) were widely requested. Community feedback also highlighted strong support for adding restrooms (185), though some opposed their inclusion (7), with opinions varying by location of the survey respondent. Issues with litter (74), dog waste (61), and trail maintenance (63) were also recurring themes, with calls for improved cleaning (23) and trimming of overgrowth (63). Many requested more trail signage (64), including difficulty markers (6), interpretive signs (26), and mile markers (30).

While the majority advocated for some improvement, a number of respondents expressed a desire to leave the area as it is (64). Other suggestions included connecting trails with a bridge (27) and creating easier trails (18) for less experienced users. Overall, the feedback between the three sample sizes were very similar, with the Orchard Glen residents skewing slightly more for minimal changes.

What amenities would help Skyline be even better?
The third question on the survey was “What amenities would help Skyline be even better?” Respondents were provided a list of 12 specific amenities and an “other” option with a text box for a write-in response. Participants were allowed to select as many options as they wanted.

The results are presented in Table 1 (below), arranged by the highest percentage of support from the largest respondent group, the open participation group. The survey revealed varying preferences for amenities across the three survey groups.

Restrooms were the most desired feature overall, with strong interest from the Open (62%) and Random (67%) samples, but lower support from Orchard Glen residents (25%). Water fountain, trail maps, and trail signage were all highly requested amenities (over 50%), following a similar trend of greater support by the Open and Random groups than the Orchard Glen group. Other amenities had varying levels of support and are represented in Table 1 (below).

Page 2440 of 2543 ends

16 Table 1. Desired amenities by respondent groups.

What Amenities would help Skyline be even
better?
Open
1,108
Random
67 Orchard
Glen
20 Restrooms 62% 67% 25%
Trail Maps 57% 67% 55%
Water Fountain 58% 47% 30%
Trail Signage 55% 56% 35%
Trees 49% 58% 40%
Shade Structures 47% 45% 20%
Seating 44% 44% 20%
More Hiking Trails 41% 41% 5%
Nearby Parking/More Parking 37% 39% 5%
Improved Security on Foothill 36% 41% 30%
Accessible Paths 28% 26% 10%
More Bike Trails 23% 26% 15%
Other 13% 12% 20%
Overall, restrooms, trail maps, trees, trail signage, and a water fountain ranked as the highestpriority improvements by the overall community.

Is there anything else you would like to add?
The last question on the survey was “Is there anything else you would like to add?” Respondents were provided an open text box and allowed to write whatever response they wanted. Figure 9 (below) is the word cloud for all responses, with the larger font representing the most frequently used words.

Page 2441 of 2543 ends

17 Figure 9. Word cloud, most frequent words for “Is there anything else you would like to add?”
The most frequent responses were variations or repeats of answers previously provided on the survey and highlighted a preference to leave it alone/do nothing (60), improve parking safety and security (58), keep it natural (39), and more parking (33). The remaining suggestions highlighted a wide range of ideas, with items like restrooms (14), trash (17), dog bags/dog waste (19), and shade/trees (12) among the most cited. Several suggestions addressed trail improvements, including maps (10), signage (10), separate trails for hikers and bikers (12), and adding new trails (10). Less frequent mentions included amenities like adding a bridge at access Hagador Trail (9), water fountains (9), seating (8), mile markers (6), and safety features such as fire prevention clearing (4), safety signs (6).

Unique ideas, mentioned only once or twice, ranged from trail etiquette and level of difficulty signage to self-guided nature routes, vending machines, emergency boxes, bike parks, and a zip line.

Overall, the feedback was consistent in prioritizing preservation along with a few select amenities:
restrooms, water fountains, trail maps, and trail signage, trees, shade and seating, nearby parking, and improved security.

3.3 Outreach to User Groups
Staff participated in seven outreach activities at Skyline Drive and City events from July 18 through August 8. During these engagements, staff discussed the Skyline Area Plan and asked all respondents to include their comments in the online Skyline survey to capture all feedback in a single location.

During the outreach events, several residents expressed their desire for a bridge that would connect Skyline Drive to Hagador Trail. Currently, trail users step over a guard rail and cross this area on an improvised log bridge over the Tin Mine creek. There are two historical bridges that cross the drainage area on the eastern portion of the meadow. Many requested to keep these bridges and refurbish them to provide access to the eastern section of the property and keep a historic aesthetic feature for the area. There were also requests for the trail directly east of the meadow to be more accessible, and for circuit trails that residents could use to walk or run on.

Many respondents complained about the lack of parking and the break-ins on Foothill Pkwy.

Mountain bikers stated a tree had fallen on the southernmost trail along the south side of the

Page 2442 of 2543 ends

18 meadow, which makes access to this area more difficult. Several inquiries were also made about why the well-used access through Skyline Drive was blocked underneath the Foothill Pkwy overpass.

On September 16, 2024, staff met with several trails enthusiasts and former Trails Working Group members at the Skyline area to review the site and gather their input. Because the majority of the trails are double black diamond or extremely difficult, the group proposed adding a kid friendly “Blue Level” bike trail on the western side of the meadow. They also suggested installing seating at two scenic, accessible spots; one near the old pond area overlooking the meadow and the city, and another along the ridge trail offering mountain views.

Additional requests from the Trails Working Group include incorporating a circuit trail on the meadow which would fulfill the need for a close walking circuit, and maintaining existing trails by trimming vegetation, preserving the old bridges with refurbishments, and adding stairs to steep sections. Restrooms, an extra water fountain, and bike bells were recommended for convenience and safety. For signage, they suggested trail identification markers, reminders for quiet hiking, pack-in pack-out trash rules, single-track guidelines, caution signs for water availability, and mileage markers along Skyline Drive. Hosting mountain bike races and running events was also proposed to boost community engagement. Designating certain trails for “Hiking only” and “Biking only” were discouraged by the users as it would limit the number of trails each group could use and would be difficult to enforce.

4.0 Recommendations
The following recommendations for the Skyline area are derived from recommendations included in the Trails Master Plan, comments received from the Skyline area survey, outreach events, and comments made by the trail user groups. Recommendations are divided into three sections:

Improvements, Maintenance & Fire Prevention, and Policies & Procedures.

Page 2443 of 2543 ends

19 4.1 Improvements
Figure 10. Map of Skyline Area Trails and Location of Proposed Improvements Trailhead Amenities

1. Install a restroom at the trailhead on Skyline Drive and Burrero Way.

2. Add a water fountain with dog bowl and bottle filler at the trailhead of Burrero Way and Skyline Drive.

3. Install a large area map and informational signage at the trailheads at Foothill Parkway and Burrero Way.

Seating and Shade

4. Provide seating and shade including, but not limited to the following locations:
a. At the trailhead on Skyline Drive and Burrero Way.
b. Lookout areas at higher elevations along Skyline Drive. c. At sites along the perimeter of the meadow.
d. Near the major trailheads and trail crossings.
e. Plant trees along the walking paths to create a canopy of shade at various locations throughout the meadow.

Page 2444 of 2543 ends

20 Figure 11. Map of Skyline Meadow Area Trails and location of proposed improvements Trash Cans

5. Install trash cans with dog bag dispensers at trailheads.

Trails & Bridges

6. Label and publicize circuit routes in the meadow with known distances and trail markers. (Figures A3-A7 in the appendix identify proposed loops with approximate distances.)

7. Maintain and improve existing nature trails utilizing US Forest Service best practices for trail maintenance.
a. Widen trails in the meadow to a width of 6 feet (where possible) to create a fire break
b. Utilize durable natural materials (e.g. decomposed granite) for tread maintenance. c. Utilize trail design features that minimize erosion and impact on the natural environment

8. Coordinate with volunteer groups and trail sponsors to maintain trails and surrounding areas.

9. Install a pedestrian/bike bridge connecting Hagador Trail and the lower meadow to Skyline Drive. (Figure 11)

10. Refurbish or replace the two bridges on the east side of the lower meadow that cross the drainage channel. (Figure 11)

Page 2445 of 2543 ends

21 11. Explore an alternative trail alignment from the eastern side of the meadow to the ‘upper meadow’ that could provide a safer and easier route than the existing steep, direct route. (Figure A8)

12. Explore improving the existing trail to the ‘upper meadow’ from Foothill Pkwy that is east of the wash and runs south, upslope, along the ridge of the wash. (Figure A8)

13. Improve or develop trails that have a ‘blue’ or easier mountain bike difficulty rating to increase the variety of mountain biking opportunities for various skill levels and user groups. (Figure 10)

14. Where possible, separate hikers and mountain bikers on joint use trails to minimize potential conflict.

Wayfinding & Signage

15. Install safety signage at the main trail entrances and the trailhead kiosk alerting individuals that trails can be dangerous, conditions can change, and to recreate at their own risk.

16. Install signage along major trails that provide the name of the trails, trail difficulty, and simplified illustrations alerting users of trail conditions. (Figures A10)

17. Create a color-coded trail map, per the IMBA Trail Difficulty System (Figures 10 & A9), to notify users of trail difficulty throughout the Skyline area.
a. Post this map at the trailheads.
b. Make the map available online and post a QR code so trail users can queue it up on their phone.

18. Update the trailhead kiosk to include information on:
a. Proper hydration and awareness of water supply
b. Rattlesnake safety information
c. Pack in and pack out
d. ‘Good Neighbor’ policies
e. Emergency information
Safety & Security

19. Install security cameras at trailheads with signage stating the area is under surveillance.

20. Improve lighting conditions near trailheads and parking areas.

21. Increase the presence of Park Rangers on trails and in the area.

22. Explore installing a ‘bell station’ for mountain bikers at major trailheads to lend bells that would help alert others when bikers are on the trail.

Parking & Accessibility

23. Pursue opportunities to expand parking.

24. Install a crosswalk on Foothill Pkwy at Trudy Way to improve safety for pedestrian crossings.

25. Re-open Skyline Dr. under Foothill Pkwy. to provide access to the area from the North.

26. Explore opportunities to improve access to the meadow area for individuals with mobility impairments.

Additional Open Space

27. Pursue land acquisition opportunities that would protect or enhance the natural environment of the Skyline area.

Page 2446 of 2543 ends

22 4.2 Maintenance and Fire Prevention
Routine Practices

1. Create and implement a routine maintenance schedule that includes tasks to be performed on a daily, weekly, quarterly, and annual basis. (Sample in Appendix D)

2. Establish routine coordination meetings with government agencies that have a shared interest in maintaining the area.

3. Establish a system for volunteers and trail users to report maintenance concerns to staff.

Fire Mitigation and Prevention

4. Ensure that routine maintenance and usage policies include fire prevention strategies such as weed abatement, fuel load reductions, and ignition source elimination.

5. Maintain existing trails to function as fire breaks, where feasible.

6. Coordinate with USFS on controlled burns in the area.

4.3 Policies and Practices
The Plan recommends several policies and practices to support the long-term sustainability of the Skyline area. Implementation of these policies and practices may require further action by the City through the adoption of administrative policies or amendments to the Corona Municipal Code.

1. Maintain the Skyline area in its natural state for the benefit of current and future generations, with allowances for minor amenities to enhance public enjoyment and accessibility.

2. Explore establishing a volunteer group to support routine maintenance and trail improvements.

3. Amenities and improvements should be designed to complement the natural environment.

4. Only native plants and trees will be used to supplement or revegetate the area.

5. The area will remain open for public use except for emergencies (e.g. floods, fires, etc.).

6. Users must follow ‘good neighbor’ guidelines including:

6.1. No yelling or loud noise is allowed near the residential area.

6.2. Open fires are prohibited.

6.3. Overnight camping is prohibited onsite.

6.4. Dogs must be on a leash at all times.

6.5. Pet waste must be picked up and deposited in trash receptacles.

6.6. Fireworks and other hazardous materials are prohibited.

6.7. Smoking and vaping is not permitted on site (to reduce fire risk)

6.8. Littering is strictly prohibited. Users must pack out all trash or deposit it in receptacles

6.9. Alcohol, drugs, and intoxicating substances are prohibited onsite.

6.10. Do not block entrances, exits or emergency access routes.

6.11. Do not feed or disturb wildlife.

6.12. Collecting rocks, plants or other natural materials is prohibited.

6.13. Weapons are prohibited onsite.

7. Users must practice good trail etiquette including:

7.1. Staying on designated trails to protect vegetation and prevent erosion.

7.2. Hikers yield to equestrians

7.3. Bikers yield to hikers and equestrians

Page 2447 of 2543 ends

23 5.0 Implementation Plan
For the purpose of this Plan, 29 projects, summarized in Table 2 below, are proposed to be completed within a three-year time period. The projects are prioritized based on feasibility of construction, cost, and increasing safety for the area. Projects that require additional design and review will be vetted further during the budget processes prior to implementation.

Table 2. Implementation Plan
# Project Name Project Description Project
Timelin
e
Est. Cost
1 Establish Trail
Volunteers
Establish a group of volunteers to support
area maintenance and notify staff of trail
conditions.

FY26 Staff Time,
Volunteers
2 Area Map Create an area trail map to be posted at
trailheads with a QR code that links to an
online version map.

FY26 Staff Time,
$500 for
map prints
3 Safety Patrols Coordinate with Park Rangers to increase patrols on trails and along Foothill Pkwy.

FY26 Staff Time
4 Meadow Seating Add seating throughout meadow FY26 $12,500 5 Trash Cans and
Dog Bag Stations
Install 6 branded metal trashcans with sleeves
and dog waste bag dispensers.

FY26 $12,200
5 Trails Day Host annual Trails Day event. Ongoing Staff Time, Volunteers
7 Skyline Bridge Construct bridge between Skyline Drive and the meadow to improve pedestrian access to
Hagador Canyon and the meadow trail
circuits.

FY26 $650,000
8 Trailhead
signage
Install signage at the Foothill Pkwy. and
Burrero Way trailheads
FY26 Staff Time,
$1000
9 Maintenance
Plan
Create and implement maintenance plan FY26 Staff Time,
Volunteers
10 Shade Trees Host events to plant shade trees along the meadow trails
FY26-27 Staff Time,
Volunteers,

Page 2448 of 2543 ends

24 $36,000 for
100 trees
11 Trail circuits Install trail signage for the circuit trails in the meadow. Remove brush and cut trails to 6’
width.

FY26-27 Staff Time,
Volunteers,
$1500 for
trail signs
12 Trail Signage Add signage at major biking trails detailing the name of the trails and the difficulty, as well as
the language instructing users to be aware of
hikers/bikers
FY26-27 Staff time,
Volunteers,
$1500 for
trail signs
13 Improved
Security on
Foothill
Install camera system and implement signage
along Foothill Pkwy.

FY27 TBD
14 Restroom and
Water Fountain
Install an ADA all-gender single concrete
block restroom with a security camera and
autolocking doors, a water fountain with dog
bowl, and bottle filler at trailhead at Burrero
and Skyline drive.

FY27 $300,000-
Restroom
$25,000-
Water
Fountain
15 Shade Trees at
trailhead
Add shade trees for the existing benches at
the Burrero trailhead.

FY27 $1,200
16 Skyline seating Install seating at select resting and elevated viewpoints adjacent to Skyline Drive
FY27 $2,500
17 Refurbish bridges Refurbish the existing bridges to provide a safe pedestrian access across the Hagador
wash.

FY27 $25,000
18 Blue trails Explore creating or improving “Blue” difficulty level trails to provide a beginner level
alternative to the existing “Black” level trails.

FY27 Staff time,
Volunteers,
Cost TBD
19 Crosswalk at
Trudy
Install a crosswalk with flashing lights and an
ADA ramp on Foothill Pkwy at Trudy way.

FY28 $100,000
20 Upper Meadow
trail
Explore an alternate trail alignment to provide
easier access to the ‘upper meadow’
FY28 Staff time,
Volunteers,
Cost TBD

Page 2449 of 2543 ends

Appendices
Appendix A: Area Maps
Figure A1. Map of Skyline Area Trails. This map is included in the masterplan as Figure 10.

Page 2450 of 2543 ends

Figure A2. Map of Skyline Meadow Area Trails. This map is included in the masterplan as Figure

11.

Page 2451 of 2543 ends

Figure A3. Proposed ‘Big’ Meadow Loop (approx. 2.25 miles length)

Page 2452 of 2543 ends

Figure A4. Proposed Meadow Loop (approx. 2.0 miles length)

Page 2453 of 2543 ends

Figure A5. Proposed West Meadow Loop (approx. 1.5 miles length) Figure A6. Proposed Center Meadow Loop (approx. 1.0 miles length)

Page 2454 of 2543 ends

Figure A7. Proposed East Loop (approx. 1.25 miles length)

Page 2455 of 2543 ends

Figure A8. Map of Trails Accessing the ‘Upper Meadow’

Page 2456 of 2543 ends

Figure A9. IMBA Trail Difficulty Rating System
Figure A10. Trail grades

Page 2457 of 2543 ends

Appendix B: General Plan:

General Plan’s Vision and Land Use Policies:

General Plan Vision 7 : Surrounded by hillsides and etched with canyons, Corona is defined by its beautiful natural setting. Corona offers stunning views from multiple vantage points.

Connections will be created between the built and natural environment to increase awareness of and opportunities for enjoyment by Corona’s residents. Conservation practices to lessen the burden on the environment will be integrated into daily life.

Land Use Policies:

LU-5.5 Enhance Coronas system of parks, greenways, and open spaces by linking these and surrounding natural areas, including along the Temescal Creek, with pedestrian trails and greenways where feasible.

LU-10.6 Establish a multi-use trail system that connects the rural and estate neighborhoods adjoining open spaces and parklands. These may be developed for pedestrians, bicycles, and/or horseback riding where allowed by zoning.

LU-16.3 Protect Viewsheds by pro
prohibiting the placement of electrical transmission lines, substations, and other types of overhead or at grade heavy infrastructure into public open space or other sensitive areas.

LU16.7 Work with Corona Fire, CAL Fire and Forest Service with property owners in affected areas to reduce and minimize the hazards associated with wildfire in the hillsides and open spaces, consistent with the goals and policies of the safety element.

LU-22.14 Require that all proposed development in the very high fire severity zones provide appropriate protection against wildfires in accordance with state law, the California Building and Fire Codes, and regulations promulgated by the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection and CALFIRE CD-4.1 Develop a plan and implement improvements that visually and physically interconnect the City’s parklands and link these and residential neighborhoods with the Cleveland National Forest, and other open spaces. This may be accomplished by the installation of a continuous corridor of trees, plantings, informational signage, trails, and/or other defining elements along streets that connect the parks and open spaces or new corridors, where feasible.

CD-4.2 New development adjoining open spaces, washes or have the ability to provide pedestrian connections to off-site trails or pathways should be designed to ensure landscape transitions and compatibility with these resources. Such improvements should be designed to provide adequate flood protection for adjoining properties.

PR-6.1 Strive to identify and connect multipurpose trails to schools, local and regional parks, residential neighborhoods, open space areas, downtown, bikeways, and other community destinations in Corona.

PR-6.2 Require new developments to provide access opportunities to trails that exist in their area or to proposed trails linking parks, recreational areas, neighborhoods, and other areas of high public concentration with a trail design suitable to the area or contribute improvements, dedications, or fees to extend trails.

PR-6.3 Encourage creation of a multipurpose trail system for hiking, biking, and equestrian use in areas commonly used for these purposes, such as along washes, creeks, drainages, hillsides,

Page 2458 of 2543 ends

parks, and other public use areas. Trails created within the MSHCP conservation areas that are not identified as a covered activity in the Western Riverside County MSHCP are to avoid and minimize impacts on biological resources by following the Guidelines for the Siting and Design of Trails and Facilities [MSHCP Section 7.4.2].

PR-6.4 Cooperate with Riverside County in establishing and completing portions of the county’s backbone trail system that crosses Corona.

PR-6.5 Ensure trails that navigate through residential neighborhoods are not obtrusive, invade the privacy of residents, or jeopardize the safety of neighborhoods.

PR-6.6 Locate, design, and regulate the use of multipurpose trails so that they reflect the character and environment where they are located and do not negatively impact natural habitat, wildlife, landforms, or cultural resources or MSHCP Conservation areas.

PR-6.7 Initiate and maintain dialogue with federal, state, and local governments to coordinate access and maintenance of trails that cross jurisdictional boundaries.

PR-6.8 Promote the safe use of trails and require infrastructure and other public rights-of-way to be designed and developed to accommodate trails in a manner that is safe and compatible with the intended primary use of the rights-of-way or easement, where feasible.

PR-6.9 Seek available funding for the maintenance and/or establishment of multi-use trails that accommodate bicycle and pedestrian users.

PR-6.10 Consider numerous outlets to make the city’s Trails Master Inventory or Trails Master Plan and bicycle plan easily accessible to the public to increase public awareness.

PR-6.11 Promote the use of trails and bicycle routes through use of wayfinding signs or placards.

PR-6.12 Raise public awareness of the health benefits of walking and bicycling, the safe use of the streets and sidewalks, and the availability of trails, bicycle routes, and greenways.

PR-6.13 Encourage the establishment of various trail classifications in the City that are suited to the environmental context on which they are located and the intended purpose and use of the trail.

PR-6.14 Consider establishment of trail heads and/or staging areas with parking for newly created trails, to the extent feasible; and if the opportunity arises, incorporate trail heads and/or staging areas into existing trail areas

Page 2459 of 2543 ends

Appendix C. Survey Information
Questionnaire Results:

2. How would you improve Skyline?
The most common responses were: Restrooms with 185 comments, while there were 7 requests for not adding restrooms. However for question #4 “Is there anything you would like to add, Restrooms had 14 comments while there were 13 comments against including restrooms. The random sample had 8 requests for a bathroom with 2 against. The Orchard Glen sample had three comments stating not to add any restrooms, with none in favor of adding them.

Safe Parking and Security regarding break-ins on Foothill were a large concern with 137 comments. Signage, patrolling and security cameras were recommended, as several commenters stated that they stopped visiting skyline because of the break ins. There were 21 comments requesting additional Rangers and patrolling.

More parking was requested with 118 comments.

Shade and trees were requested with 117 comments, often they were requested further up skyline.

There were 93 comments for seating, these were also often requested further up the trail, or rest stops along the trail.
85 requests were for a water fountain. Some were also requests for one at the top of Skyline drive.

Trash can, littering and people leaving their dog’s poop were top comments with 74 comments regarding trash and littering and 61 addressing dog poop.

Page 2460 of 2543 ends

There were 64 requests for trail signs, identifying the different signs. There were 20 requests for nature interpretive signs, 8 request for signage stating to be aware of Mountain Bikers, 7 requests for directional signs on trails, and signs denoting the difficulty of the trails, 6 comments for interpretive signs detailing the area’s history. There were 30 comments requesting installation of mile markers along Skyline drive.

There were 63 comments regarding better maintenance of the trails, particularly cutting back the overgrowth. There were 23 comments regarding maintenance regarding cleaning the area, such as picking up trash.

There were 57 comments that no improvements are needed, and 7 stating that the Skyline area is perfect the way it is.

There were 27 requests for a bridge to connect Hagador trail to Skyline.

There were 18 requests for easier trails. The sentiment was that all of the single track Mountain Bike and Hiking trails are very steep and can only be utilized by experienced hikers and mountain bikers.

The random sample had the most comments at 12 for more parking, 8 for a restroom, 7 for safer parking, trash cans and seating.

The Orchard Glen residents had the most comments at 3 for “Do Nothing, Leave it alone” and do not add a restroom. There were 2 comments for clean up the area, trail signage, a trail map, dog poop, and adding a water fountain.

3. What Amenities would help Skyline be even better?

Page 2461 of 2543 ends

Restrooms received a high level of interest overall with 62% of the open sample and 67% of the random sample. However only 25% of the Orchard Glen residents felt it was important.

Water fountains also saw strong interest from the open sample (58%) but slightly less from the random sample (47%) and even lower from Orchard Gen (30%).

Trail maps were highly valued across all groups but had a notable increase in interest from the random sample (67%).

Trail signage showed similar levels of interest across the open (55%) and random samples (56%) but only 35% of Orchard Glen residents indicated it would be beneficial.

Trees were also valued more by the open (49%) and random (45%) groups, with less interest from Orchard Glen residents (40%).

Shade Structures had nearly equal interest from the open (47%) and random (45%) groups but a much lower interest from Orchard Glen residents (20%).

Seating was valued equally by the open and random groups (both 44%) but again much lower by Orchard Glen residents (20%).

More hiking trails and nearby parking were of minimal interest among Orchard Glen residents (5% each) compared to the open and random groups, who both saw them as moderate priorities (41% and 39%).

Improved Security had moderate interest from all groups, with the Orchard Glen sample valuing it slightly more than the open group (30% compared to 36%).

Accessible paths and bike trails had relatively low interest across the board, with slight variations.

Other answers show a unique set of responses from Orchard Glen, suggesting they might have specific needs or considerations not captured by the other items.

Page 2462 of 2543 ends

Overall the data suggests that priorities for improvements differ among the three groups. The open and random samples have similar preferences, especially for restrooms, trail maps and trees. The Orchard Glen residents, however place less emphasis on many of these improvements, indicating that their needs or current satisfaction levels with these amenities may differ. Restrooms, water fountains and trail signage were highly valued by the open and random groups, suggesting these as priority areas if catering to a broad user base.

As detailed in the above bar graphs, the most popular amenities are restrooms, water fountain, trail maps, trail signage, trees, shade structures, seating, more trails, nearby parking and improved security.

4. Is there anything else you would like to add?
For All Responses to this section:
“leave it alone/do nothing” was mentioned 60 times.
“Safer parking/more security” was mentioned 58 times.
“keep it natural” was mentioned 39 times.

Parking was mentioned 33 times.
“Thank you” was mentioned 38 times.

The rest of the items that were mentioned between 10-20 times were; restroom (14), antirestroom (13), trash (17), dog bags/dog poop (19), shade/trees (12), trail map (10), separate trails for hikers and bikers (12) trail signage (10), more trails (10), and more trails similar to Skyline (11).

The remaining comments with less than 10 mentions were: seating,(8) anti-seating (1), water fountain (9), clean maintenance (4), trail maintenance (9), fire prevention clearing (4), mile markers (6), historical signs (1), interpretive signage, (4) directional signs (1), beware of bikers/hikers signage (3), big “welcome to Skyline” sign (1), boundary markers (1), safety signs (5), trash/dog poop signage (7), trail etiquette signs (1), signs keep quiet (2), visual markers at lookouts (1), anti motorcycles, ticket them (4), anti-mountain bike (3), anti-ebike (9), pro e bike (1), foothill traffic is too fast, put in a light (4), provide a bridge for Hagador (9), close the trail on fire concern days (2), coffee and snack vending (2), unblock the trail under the bridge (1), antivehicles driving on the trails (3), allow more vehicles on the trail (9), easier mountain bike trails (1), ranger led events (2), make parking in the flood basin (3), add a water fall (2), keep people out of orchard glen (3), add a zip line (2), boot washing station (1), group rides (1), rent E bikes (1), cell reception (2), bike park/pump track (4), skate park (1), remove parking altogether (1), wave pool (1), shopping, brewery, coffee shops (1), cars block the fire hydrants (1), pond (1), limit parking (1), bikes are too fast (2), add parking meters (4), don’t charge money (3), add an emergency box (2), more trail volunteer days (2), picnic area (1), its too crowded/keep people out (1), people are loud (1), separate trails for hikers and bikers (4), lighting (5), walking loop (1), 5K/Mountain Bike races (2), call box (3), pickleball (1), and easy trails (1).

For the random sample, the most comments were for safety/parking safety at 5, and fire prevention with 3. No bathrooms were mentioned twice, and “keep it natural” was mentioned

Page 2463 of 2543 ends

twice. The remainder of comments mentioned once each were; bikes are too fast, pump track, more easy mountain bike trails, trail signage, trail map, anti-lighting, anti-motorcycle, leave it alone, make more trails like skyline, keep people out of Oak Glen neighborhood, it is too crowded, parking, pick up dog poop, nature guides, parking in the flood basin, and trash cans.

The Orchard Glen Sample had two mentions of anti-restroom, and fire protection, and one comment each for keeping people out of Orchard Glen neighborhood, easier mountain bike trails, no lighting, keep it natural, anti-motorcycle, dog poop, fix the water fountain, add parking in the flood basin.

For both question 1 and 4 there were several comments that stood out, but were only mentioned once:
 Add trail running or bicycle events.
 Add trail etiquette signs, such as obey rules similar to traffic, don’t fan out and block the road, make your presence known
 Signs that indicate where you are going and distance to get there “Weatherball 3.2 miles”
 Have an organized trail repair day
 Signs detailing trail difficulty so that bikers don’t get in over their heads. There are IMBA standards black, blue, or green diamond.
 Signs saying Foothill is being monitored/signage for “of you see suspicious activities…”  Self-guided nature routes for kids
 Parking on both sides of Foothill with a crosswalk
 Hay bales along the climb to rest
 It is difficult to get strollers through the gate
 A trail map that shows difficulty level
 Signage for what to do in case of rattlesnakes
 First aid kit in a bathroom
 Update the mine information plaque
 Be mindful of tree seedlings when mowing
On September 16, 2024 Staff met onsite with several trails enthusiasts and former Trails Working Group Members to review the site and gather their input. The main suggestions included adding a “Blue Level” bike trail designed for kids. The trail would cross the western side of the meadow, winding through the trees. Another popular suggestion was to locate a seat at a flat section of land on the southern side of the meadow, just west of the old pond area, at a flat section that could serve as a resting and viewing spot. There is currently a flat section of land adjacent to an existing trail that could be utilized for this. A seat in this area would provide an easy and accessible resting spot that provides a view of the meadow and the city of Corona.

There was also a suggestion for a seat along the western side of the circular trail that follows the ridge of the old pond, providing views of the meadow and mountains. This would provide another easily accessible viewpoint and resting spot. They requested that we carve a trail along the flat

Page 2464 of 2543 ends

western side of the meadow, that meanders through the trees and bushes, to create a circuit for the portion of Hagador trail that is within the City’s property.

Other frequent requests included installing a restroom and an additional water fountain. There were requests for maintenance of the trails, such as trimming back the vegetation encroaching on the trails, and clearing a tree that is blocking a path. It was requested that when mowing the property, that the City make note to preserve the trails. There were requests to keep the old bridges that cross the ravine on the eastern side of the meadow, and refurbish them so that they can be safely crossed. Adding stairs to the steeper hill sections was suggested, and that the City should host Mountain Bike races or running events. Bike Bells were suggested to mitigate potential accidents between hikers and bikers on the steep single track trails.

In terms of signage, participants asked for trail identification signs, reminders for quiet hiking, pack-in pack-out trash policies, single-track trail rules (such as downhill only and awareness of other users), and caution signs for water. They also requested mileage markers along skyline.

Page 2465 of 2543 ends

Appendix D. Sample Maintenance Schedule
The following maintenance standards are recommended for the City-owned areas to ensure a clean, safe, and enjoyable experience:

Daily

1. Clean and maintain restrooms. Ensure that autolocking door features are functioning properly to prevent undesirable uses.

2. Empty trash cans and replace liners at trailheads.

Weekly

1. Pick up litter at trailheads.

2. Remove graffiti.

3. Refill dog bag dispensers.

Quarterly

1. Conduct weed abatement along Tin Mine Canyon creek between Burrero Way and Chase Drive, and along Hagador Canyon creek from the trailhead to Chase Drive.

2. Remove or treat poison oak and other nuisance plants along main trails.

3. Mow the meadow every spring, summer, and fall to reduce fire hazard.

4. Maintain proper right of way clearance and remove vegetation on the paved portion of Skyline drive from the Oak Street basin to the Skyline Drive gate at Burrero way.

5. Inspect seating, signage, and bridges for integrity and vandalism.

6. Inspect newly planted trees and stake positioning to ensure proper growth.

Annually

1. Inspect, maintain, and repair erosion on hiking trails that cross washes (e.g. near Burrero Drive, and near the western most edge of the meadow).

2. Repair trail surfacing on meadow trails.

3. Cut back overgrown vegetation along trails.

4. Replace Best Management Practices Stormwater Protection to mitigate run off (Winter).

5. Follow approved SOPs for tree establishment, maintenance, and inspection.

Page 2466 of 2543 ends

DATE: 06/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Community Services Department
2025-258

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

AUTOMATED TIMED LOCKS FOR PARK RESTROOM SITES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the City Council to provide direction on the installation of automated timed locks at Sierra Bella Park, Park View Park, and Rock Vista Park, which are currently locked by contractual security services, and Ontario Park, Brentwood Park, Tehachapi Park, Kellogg Park, and Butterfield Park, which are currently locked by the Park Rangers.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council provide direction on the installation of automated door locking systems at eight park restrooms.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

On May 7, 2025, the Community Services Department presented information to City Council on the installation of timed automated gates at Sierra Bella Park, adding similar gates at other parks, and securing park restrooms either with Park Rangers or automated locking systems. The City Council provided directions to proceed with installing a timed automated gate at Sierra Bella Park; however, a consensus on restroom security was not reached. Staff were directed to further research the warranty coverage and expected service life of the proposed automated locks and return with an update.

ANALYSIS:

Page 2467 of 2543 ends

Community Services staff explored the cost of converting the restroom doors at eight city parks to automatic timed locking systems. The City currently contracts a security company to lock and secure restrooms at four park sites nightly, at an annual cost of $96,000. Automating the locking systems at these sites would eliminate this need. The cost estimate to convert the restrooms to automated timed locks at these park sites, along with five additional park sites that are currently locked and reopened by the Park Rangers, is $33,300. This one-time cost would be recovered in less than four months with the elimination of the security contract.

Alternatively, the City could assign Park Rangers to lock and unlock the restrooms at the four sites currently serviced by the security contractor in addition to their existing duties.

This would require approximately three additional staff hours per day, at an annual cost of $27,000. Either approach would result in cost savings for the City.

The Community Services Department conducted a thorough review of available locking mechanisms and identified Trilogy Lock as the provider of the selected system. These locks are known for their reliability and come with a manufacturer-backed two-year warranty, providing durability and support. Additionally, the locks are designed with longlasting power efficiency, offering an estimated battery life of approximately five years, which minimizes the need for frequent maintenance or battery replacement. As a point of reference, the City of Irvine recently implemented these same locks at several public restroom facilities, further demonstrating their suitability for municipal use.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The financial impact of converting the restroom doors at the above-mentioned park sites to automated timed locks is a one-time cost of $33,300. However, this cost would be offset by the elimination of contract security services currently used to lock restrooms, which totals $96,000 annually. So, the total net savings would be $62,700 in year one and $96,000 per year thereafter.

Alternatively, if the City Council chooses to utilize the Park Rangers to lock and re-open the park restrooms instead of utilizing the security services contract, it will result in a cost of $27,000 per year for additional Park Ranger hours. But, there will be a total net savings of $69,000 per year.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This action seeks direction from the Council regarding the installation of a timed automated parking lot gates at various park sites and the conversion of 8 restroom doors to automated locking systems. Therefore, no environmental analysis is required.

Page 2468 of 2543 ends

PREPARED BY: MOSES CORTEZ, PARKS AND TRAILS MANAGER
REVIEWED BY: DONNA FINCH, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR

Page 2469 of 2543 ends

Park Restroom Autolocking
Systems
Moses Cortez
Parks & Trails Manager

Page 2470 of 2543 ends

Today’s Ask
That City Council provide direction on the installation of auto door locking systems at nine park restrooms.
2

Page 2471 of 2543 ends

• The City has a total of 38 parks
• 30 parks have parking lots, which are not secured or closed after hours
• All parks have restrooms
• Security services manually lock the restrooms at 4 park sites
• Park Rangers manually lock the restrooms at 5 park sites • The remaining restrooms stay open
Background

Page 2472 of 2543 ends

Park Restrooms
Autolocking Retro-Fit
• Existing door hardware can be retrofitted with CXT Autolocking System • Automatic programing would lock and unlock restrooms at park’s closing and opening hours
• City has 30 parks with restroom buildings; 9 restrooms are manually locked each night, for a total of 18 restroom doors
• Estimated retrofit cost: $1,850 per door
Total estimated project cost: $33,300*
*Based on cost of retrofitting manually locked restroom doors; cost offset by eliminating security guard services ($96,000/yr. savings)
4 4

Page 2473 of 2543 ends

5 May 7, 2025 Council Meeting
Council directed staff to further research the warranty coverage and expected service life of the proposed automated locks.

Research Results:
• Automated locks come with a manufacturer-backed two-year warranty • Expected battery service life is five years

Page 2474 of 2543 ends

Park Restroom Options
6 Option 1
Status Quo
Option 2
Install Auto Door Locking Systems at 9 Park
Restrooms
Option 3
Utilize Park Rangers to Manually Lock
Restrooms
Pros • Process works
• Cost savings - Eliminate
contract security
service
• Frees up Park Rangers
for needed duties
• Cost savings - Eliminate
contract security
service
Cons
• No security
enhancements
• Highest cost
• Risk of people hiding in
restrooms after hours
• Locks can break and will
need replacing
• Additional
responsibilities added
to Park Rangers
Cost $96,000
$33,300 One-Time Cost
($63,0000 Year 1 net
savings)
$96,000 Annual Savings
Thereafter
$69,000 Annual Savings*
*Based on $96,000/yr. savings due to elimination of contract security service, plus $27,000/yr. increase for additional Park Ranger hours.

Page 2475 of 2543 ends

Today’s Ask
That City Council provide direction on the installation of auto door locking systems at nine park restrooms.
7

Page 2476 of 2543 ends

8 951-739-4057
[email protected]
www.CoronaCA.gov
Questions?

Page 2477 of 2543 ends

DATE: 06/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Planning and Development Department
2025-244

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION 2024-0002 ESTABLISHING A NEW 67-

FOOT-TALL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS, MONO-EUCALYPTUS TREE, LOCATED AT 1660 LEESON LANE IN THE M-3 (HEAVY MANUFACTURING) ZONE (APPLICANT: KERRIGAN DIEHL, PLANCOM INC.)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the City Council to affirm the decision by the Planning and Housing Commission in granting Conditional Use Permit Modification 2024-0002 (CUPM2024- 0002) to establish a new 67-foot tall wireless telecommunications, mono-eucalyptus tree.

The project is located at 1660 Lesson Lane in the M-3, Heavy Manufacturing zone. The new mono-eucalyptus tree will replace an existing 62-foot tall wireless telecommunications, monopole located on the project site.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council:
a. Take no action, thereby affirming the Planning and Housing Commission’s action granting CUPM2024-0002, based on the findings contained in the staff report and conditions of approval.

OR
b. Set the item for review at a subsequent meeting.

Page 2478 of 2543 ends

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

Project Background
The proposal submitted by Plancom Inc. on behalf of Verizon Wireless proposes to demolish an existing 62-foot tall wireless telecommunications monopole and associated ground equipment and construct a new 67-foot tall mono-eucalyptus tree in conjunction with new ground equipment. The project site is currently developed with an industrial building owned and operated by the Mission Rubber Company.

The property’s existing monopole was approved in 1992 by CUP92-02, with the tower portion of the structure owned by American Tower Company (ATC). The mounted antennas and associated ground equipment are owned and operated by Verizon Wireless. The new mono-eucalyptus tree will be located just slightly to the east of the existing tower, generally in the same location.

ANALYSIS:

Site Plan
The proposed mono-eucalyptus tree is located on the southeastern corner of the project site, which is also the rear of the property. A 271-square-foot enclosure containing accessory equipment and surrounded by an eight-foot-tall block wall is also proposed and would be located adjacent to the new tower. More broadly, all proposed development would be located approximately 680 feet south of Leeson Lane, 330 feet west of South Temescal Street, and 1,000 feet from (street) All American Way.

The property’s M-3 zoning prescribes no minimum side or rear yard setback requirements, and a maximum height of 40 feet. However, the height may be increased by one foot for every one foot of setback from the property line not exceeding 55 feet. An even greater height may be permitted by the Planning Commission subject to approval of a CUP (CMC Section 17.65.060 [a]). The centerline of the mono-eucalyptus pole would be located 15 feet from the side and 34 feet from the rear property lines and exceed the maximum height of the zone by 12 feet.

Before and during construction of the new 67-foot tall mono-eucalyptus tree, a 62-foottall temporary monopole intended to maintain Verizon’s provision of service is proposed adjacent to the location of the permanent facility. The temporary tower and associated equipment would be surrounded by a temporary eight-foot-tall chain-link enclosure.

Antennas and Screening
The mono-eucalyptus tree is comprised of a support pole, serving as the “trunk” of the faux tree, supporting three separate, mounted antenna sectors. There will be a total of 12 antenna panels, six Remote Radio Units (RRU), and three Raycap surge suppressor units mounted onto the antenna sectors, all at a height of 62 feet above grade level.

Additionally, a microwave antenna measuring a four-feet in diameter will be mounted onto the support pole at a height of approximately 48 feet. Numerous faux branches will be mounted to the tower’s support pole, projecting outward to a minimum of one foot, six

Page 2479 of 2543 ends

inches beyond the extent of all antennas. The antenna panels, RRUs, Raycap units and microwave antenna are required to be painted green to match the color of the branches.

Additionally, the antennas are required to be covered with “socks” that are textured to match the tree’s foliage. The screening elements are standard requirements for faux tree designs.

While Verizon is currently the only cellular carrier proposed to operate from the tower, the structure can accommodate a second set of antennas should another wireless carrier wish to collocate in the future.

Access and Maintenance
Access to the project site will remain unchanged from Leeson Lane. Internal access through the site will be on existing asphalt and will accommodate a service technical vehicle onsite when periodic maintenance is conducted. Typical maintenance occurs remotely, and an on-site inspection anticipated to occur every three months.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The applicant paid the application processing fee of $13,828.14 to cover the cost of the Conditional Use Permit.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Per Section 15302(c) (Replacement or Reconstruction) of the State Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 3.31 of the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, a Notice of Exemption has been prepared for the project as the project qualifies as a Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction) categorical exemption. The project proposes the replacement of an existing wireless facility with a new facility of substantially the same size, purpose and capacity.

PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSION ACTION:

At its meeting of May 28, 2025, the Planning and Housing Commission considered the subject matter and took the following action:

Motion was made, seconded (Siqueland/Vernon) and carried with Vice Chair Alexander absent, that the Planning and Housing Commission find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302(c), adopt Resolution No. 2667 granting CUPM2024-0002, based on the findings contained in the staff report and conditions of approval. The minutes of the Planning and Housing Commission meeting are included as Exhibit 4.

PREPARED BY: JOANNE COLETTA, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ATTACHMENTS:

Page 2480 of 2543 ends

1. Exhibit 1 – Locational and zoning map

2. Exhibit 2 – Site plan for Conditional Use Permit Modification 2024-0002

3. Exhibit 3 – Planning and Housing Commission staff report

4. Exhibit 4 – Draft minutes of the Planning and Housing Commission meeting of May 28, 2025

Page 2481 of 2543 ends

AERIAL & LOCATIONAL MAP
CZ2022-0004 & GPA2022-0004

PROMENADE AVE NEAR SIXTH
STREET
Project
Site C3 MP County of Riverside M3
CUPM2024-0002
1660 Leeson Lane
Dudley Way
Magnolia Avenue
M3
South Temescal Street
Land Use Legend:

M3 - Heavy Manufacturing
C3 - General Community
Commercial
MP - Mobile Home Park
M3 Leeson Lane

Page 2482 of 2543 ends

O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP

O/HP O/HP O/HP O/HP
O/HP
O/HP O/HP O/HP E E F F TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT 16776 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE, UNIT 203 SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE

BUILDING C
IRVINE, CA 92618 SHEET TITLE: ISSUE STATUS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY

E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E F F

F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F
F F F
E E E E E E E E F F F F F F F F F TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT 16776 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE, UNIT 203 SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE

BUILDING C
IRVINE, CA 92618 SHEET TITLE: ISSUE STATUS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY

MAGNETIC
NORTH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0" 2' 4' 8'
6'-0" SCE UTILITIES

EASEMENT
23'-4"
5'-0"
10'-5"
12"
14'-0"
15'-0"
1 AREA: 271 SQ. FT. KEYED NOTES:
2784631 (N) 4'-0" WIDE x 8'-0" HIGH STEEL PICKET GATE WITH VERIZON SIGNAGE ON ADJACENT WALL. SEE DETAILS911 (N) E/911 GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (N) EQUIPMENT CABINET EXTEND MINIMUM 12" ABOVE TOP OF WALL 121314 REMOVE (E) CONCRETE LANDING & STEPS 15 (N) MAIN GROUND BUS BAR MOUNTED TO INSIDE FACE OF CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE WALL 16 (N) (4) 4"Ø CABLE CONDUIT & (1) 1-1/2"Ø CONDUIT FOR GROUND 17182021 4D1
3D1 19 PROVIDE 4" x 8" OPENING AT BASE OF WALL FOR DRAINAGE (TYPICAL OF 3) (N) 6 GAUGE INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL CHAIN LINK LID WITH 2" MESH OPENING 10 (N) VERIZON CABLE TRENCH TO TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS (SHOWN DASHED) (N) VERIZON WALL MOUNTED FIBER CABINET (N) PERMANENT VERIZON 8'-0" TALL CONCRETE BLOCK EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE 2'-8" WIDE x 4'-0" HIGH VENTILATION OPENING WITH STEEL FRAME & PICKETS @ 4" O.C. (N) PERMANENT VERIZON 67'-0" HIGH TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS & FOOTING. SEE SHEET A-3 FOR ANTENNA PLAN & TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS ELEVATION (N) CONCRETE SLAB (N) 17" x 30" FIBER HAND HOLE WITH BOLT-DOWN CONCRETE COVER 5 9
4 2
3 6 20 30
7 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 24282926272522233032333431 (E) CONTOUR LINES @1-0" INTERVALS (E) OVERHEAD UTLITY LINES 353637 PROPERTY LINE, TYPICAL REMOVE (E) VERIZON 62'-0" HIGH WOOD POLE WITH ANTENNAS, RRUS, MOUNTING BRACKETS & CABLES (SHOWN DASHED) REMOVE (E) VERIZON CHAIN LINK FENCE ENCLOSURE AROUND WOOD POLE AND PARTIAL CHAIN LINK FENCE ON SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY (SHOWN DASHED) (E) LIGHT STANDARD TO REMAIN (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH BARBED WIRE TO REMAIN (E) CONCRETE BLOCK WALL TO REMAIN (E) CONCRETE LOADING PAD TO REMAIN 19 RELOCATED SCE ELECTRICAL METER 22 23 21 32 34 658.00'
657.00' 35 36 35 38 37 39 43 43 (N) VERIZON WALL MOUNTED INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER (ILC) (N) TRENCH FOR POWER & FIBER REMOVE (E) VERIZON EQUIPMENT BUILDING INCLUDING ALL INTERIOR EQUIPMENT, CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS, PADS & LANDINGS (SHOWN DASHED) (N) SERVICE LIGHT FIXTURE 10D1 17 21 24'-0" 25 26 31 24 25 26 REROUTE (E) OVERHEAD VERIZON ELECTRICAL SERVICE FROM (E) UTILITY POLE UNDERGROUND TO (TEMP) & TO (N) EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE REROUTE (E) OVERHEAD VERIZON FIBER SERVICE FROM (E) UTILITY POLE UNDERGROUND TO (TEMP) & (N) EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE (N) 17" x 30" HANDHOLES WITH CONCRETE COVER (3) FOR FIBER, (3) FOR POWER, (6) TOTAL 33 33 404142 (N) CONDUIT & CONDUCTORS IN TRENCH TO (E) LIGHT STANDARD 32 28 (N) VERIZON BATTERY CABINET. CABINET SHALL BE "HARDENED" WITH STAINLESS STEEL PROTECTION ASSEMBLY WITH MASTER KEYED HIDDEN SHACKLE PADLOCK WITH HIGH SECURITY HASP PER NETWORK ASSURANCE (N) VERIZON POWER PLANT / EQUIPMENT CABINET WITH BATTERIES IN THE BOTTOM. CABINET SHALL BE "HARDENED" WITH STAINLESS STEEL PROTECTION ASSEMBLY WITH MASTER KEYED HIDDEN SHACKLE PADLOCK WITH HIGH SECURITY HASP PER NETWORK ASSURANCE FUTURE VERIZON CABINET (SHOWN DASHED) 3'-0"
2'-8"
3'-4"
3'-0"
12"
3'-0"
12"
3'-0"
2'-0"
5 2'-2"
8'-6"
2'-0" (N) VERIZON 30KW AC STAND-BY GENERATOR WITH 221 GALLON SEISMIC DOUBLE WALL DIESEL FUEL TANK 7'-10"
3'-4"
72'-0"
5'-3" (N) VERIZON WALL MOUNTED FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH 29 UTILITY CONDUIT IN TRENCH FOR TEMP SITE (E) CONCRETE DRAINAGE SWALE (E) DRAINAGE PATTERN 41 (E) CONCRETE FILLED BOLLARDS TO REMAIN (TYPICAL) (E) PROPANE TANKS INSIDE METAL STORAGE CAGES TO REMAIN 38 39 41 41 41 658.10' F.G. 657.7' F.G.
658.7' F.G.
659.91' (E)
658.80' F.G. FINISHED SLAB: 658.4'
658.00' F.G. 658.15' F.G. 657.80' F.G. (E) ABANDONED FUEL TANK TO BE REMOVED BY OWNER (SHOWN DASHED) 43 42 10 41 8 41 27 44 (E) GRAVEL & COMPACTED EARTH AROUND (E) VERIZON SHELTER & POLE 44 40 TEMPORARY SITE PROPOSED TEMPORARY VERIZON EQUIPMENT ON A CONCRETE BALLASTED BASE WITH A 62'-0" MONOPOLE. SEE SHEETS A6 - A12. Page 2485 of 2543 ERICSSON TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT 16776 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE, UNIT 203 SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE

BUILDING C
IRVINE, CA 92618 SHEET TITLE: ISSUE STATUS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY

TEMESCANYON
1660 LEESON LANE
CORONA, CA 92879 0 02/28/2023 90% ZD REVIEW RL 1 06/02/2023 90% ZD DRM COMMENTS RL 234567 06/26/2023 11/06/2032 12/18/2023 01/10/2024 08/16/2024 10/21/2024 100% ZD ENCL. SIZE INCREASE REVISED 90% ZD 100% ZD CITY STAFF COMMENTS COMBINED PERM & TEMP RL RL RL RL RL RL A-3 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON PROJECT I.D. : 17276944 PERMANENT TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS ELEVATION & ANTENNA PLAN 0" 2' 4' 8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" MAGNETIC NORTH 8'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" GAMMA SECTOR AZIMUTH 0° APPROXIMATE OUTLINE OF (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS BRANCHES AT ANTENNA LEVEL 11D1 TYPICAL (N) SURGE SUPPRESSOR MOUNTED TO CROSS ARM. (TYPICAL OF 3) SEE DETAILS 9D1 6D1 (N) RRUS UNITS. TWO (2) PER SECTOR (TOTAL OF 6) MOUNTED TO CROSS ARM BEHIND ANTENNAS. SEE DETAIL 8D1 12D1 (N) GALVANIZED STEEL ANTENNA SUPPORT ARM (TYPICAL) (N) GALVANIZED STEEL ANTENNA CROSS ARM (TYPICAL) ALPHA SECTOR AZIMUTH 120° BETA SECTOR AZIMUTH 240° 22'-0" 1'-6" MIN. EXTENSION OF BRANCHES BEYOND ANTENNAS IN DOWNTILT POSITION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" (N) (4) 4"Ø CABLE CONDUIT & (1) 1-1/2"Ø CONDUIT FOR GROUND PROVIDE (2) 9" x 24" HANDHOLES AT BASE WITH COVERS (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS "TRUNK" WITH BARK TEXTURE 1AA3 1'-6" MIN. EXTENSION OF BRANCHES BEYOND ANTENNAS IN DOWNTILT POSITION 657.81' A.M.S.L. 0'-0" A.G.L. TOP OF (N) CAISSON CENTERLINE OF HANDHOLES 1BA3 PROVIDE (3) (N) 6" x 12" HANDHOLES (E) GRADE (N) CONCRETE FOOTING. TYPE (MAT OR CAISSON) AND REINFORCING PER TREE MANUFACTURER'S DESIGN 67'-0" 62'-0" 61'-6" 60'-8" 58'-0" 2'-0"
3'-0" BOTTOM OF (N) BRANCHES TOP OF BARK TEXTURE TRUNK ABOVE TO BE PAINTED DARK BROWN 6" 5'-0" 22'-6" 724.81' A.M.S.L. 67'-0" A.G.L. 719.81' A.M.S.L. 62'-0" A.G.L. 715.81' A.M.S.L. 58'-0" A.G.L. TOP OF TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS BRANCHES (HIGHEST POINT / FIXED FIXTURE) TOP OF (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS TRUNK & TOP OF (N) VERIZON ANTENNAS RAD CENTER OF (N) VERIZON ANTENNAS CENTERLINE OF HANDHOLES 22'-0" PERMANENT TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS ELEVATION ANTENNA & EQUIPMENT CAMOUFLAGE NOTES: 1. COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B AND ERICSSON KRE 105281/1 ANTENNAS MAY BE COVERED BY RF TRANSPARENT NEEDLE SOCKS. 2. RRU 4449 & 8843 UNITS MAY BE COVERED BY RF TRANSPARENT NEEDLE SOCKS. BUT, MAY NOT BE PAINTED. 3. RAYCAP SURGE SUPPRESSORS MAY BE PAINTED TO MATCH DOMINANT COLOR OF TREE FOLIAGE. 4. ERICSSON AIR6449 ANTENNAS MAY ONLY BE COVERED WITH 3M FILM IN A COLOR THAT MATCHES THE DOMINANT TREE COLOR. ONLY THE FACE AND SIDES MAY RECEIVE FILM. THE BACK OF THESE ANTENNAS MAY NOT BE COVERED, FILMED OR PAINTED. 5. ALL EXPOSED CABLES, BRACKETS & SUPPORTS SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH FAUX TREE FOLIAGE. 11D1 11D1 48'-0" CENTERLINE OF MICROWAVE MICROWAVE AZIMUTH TBD° PER SECTOR OF CABLES NUMBER COAX. CABLE JUMPER (+ / - 5') (+ / - 3') LENGTH LENGTH RADIO TYPE 6'-0" SECTOR DIRECTION AZIMUTH BETA2 BETA1 240° 0° GAMMA1 GAMMA2 MODEL CENTER RAD NOTES: INSTALL (1) 6 x 12 HYBRID FIBER POWER CABLE FOR EACH SECTOR (TOTAL OF 3) INSTALL (1) DEMARCATION JUNCTION BOX (RAYCAP SURGE SUPPRESSOR) FOR EACH SECTOR (TOTAL OF 3) SEE DETAIL INSTALL (16) ANTENNAS: (3) ERICSSON KRE105281/1: 8.4" LENGTH X 7.9" WIDE X 4.9" DEEP, WEIGHT: 11.0 LBS (6) COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B: 96.0" LENGTH x 11.9" WIDE x .7.1" DEEP, WEIGHT: 51.6 LBS (3) ERICSSON AIR6419: 31.3" LENGTH X 16.1" WIDE X 9.8" DEEP, WEIGHT: 71.0 LBS INSTALL (2) RRU UNITS FOR EACH SECTOR, (TOTAL OF 6). SEE DETAILS 1234 SIZE 2 SURGE SUPPRESSOR 3(1) 1 4 BETA3 BETA4 GAMMA3 GAMMA4 RFDS T.B.D. INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA (1) RRU 4890 (1) RRU 4490 (1) 6'-0" INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA (1) RRU 4890 (1) RRU 4490 6'-0" ALPHA1 120° (1) (1) 6 X 12 HYBRID CABLE ERICSSON: AIR6419 31.3" L x 16.1" W x 9.8" D 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA (1) RRU 4890 (1) RRU 4490 COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 85'-0" ALPHA2 ALPHA3 ALPHA4 SOUTHEAST SOUTHWEST NORTH ERICSSON: KRE105281/1 8.4" L x 7.9" W x 4.9" D (1) 6 X 12 HYBRID CABLE (1) 6 X 12 HYBRID CABLE MICROWAVE TBD TBD 4'-0"Ø 48'-0" 32'-0" COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D ERICSSON: AIR6419 31.3" L x 16.1" W x 9.8" D COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D 85'-0" ERICSSON: KRE105281/1 8.4" L x 7.9" W x 4.9" D COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D ERICSSON: AIR6419 31.3" L x 16.1" W x 9.8" D COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D 85'-0" ERICSSON: KRE105281/1 8.4" L x 7.9" W x 4.9" D COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D 61'-6" 58'-0" 60'-8" 61'-6" 58'-0" 60'-8" 61'-6" 58'-0" 60'-8" 6D1 9D1 1D1 2D1 5D1 8D1 12D1 5 4408-B48 RRU UNITS ARE INTEGRAL WITH KRE105281/1 ANTENNAS 5 UPPER TRUNK REFERENCE 1A3 A (N) TRUNK PLAN AT BASE N.T.S. 1 SCALE: HANDHOLE DETAIL N MAGNETIC NORTH 284° (2) 6" x 12" (N) HANDHOLE EACH UPPER TRUNK (N) 10.75"Ø UPPER TRUNK TRUNK 0°, 120° TRUNK 120°, 240° TRUNK 240°, 0° NOTE: ANTENNA AZIMUTHS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. TWO UPPER PORTS ARE TYPICAL EACH UPPER TRUNK (SEE ANTENNA PLAN) (SEE ANTENNA PLAN) (SEE ANTENNA PLAN) AZIMUTH PER PLAN (2) 9" x 24" (N) HANDHOLES AZIMUTH PER PLAN 104° B (N) TRUNK PLAN AT HANDHOLES @ 56'-0" (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS UPPER LEVEL TRUNKS (TYPICAL) 6 RRU UNITS AT ERICSSON AIR6419 ARE INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNAS 6 (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS TRUNK @ 3'-0" PERMANENT SITE (N) VERIZON ANTENNAS & RRU RADIO UNITS MOUNTED ON A (N) 67'-0" HIGH TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS. SEE TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS ELEVATION ON THIS SHEET PERMANENT ANTENNA PLAN PERMANENT SITE (N) VERIZON 4'-0" Ø MICROWAVE ANTENNA ON (N) 67'-0" HIGH TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS PERMANENT SITE (N) VERIZON 4'-0" Ø MICROWAVE ANTENNA ON (N) 67'-0" HIGH TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS PERMANENT SITE (N) VERIZON ANTENNAS & RRU RADIO UNITS MOUNTED ON UPPER TRUNKS OF TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS Page 2486 of 2543 ERICSSON TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT 16776 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE, UNIT 203 SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE

BUILDING C
IRVINE, CA 92618 SHEET TITLE: ISSUE STATUS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY

19.18"

19.18" 15.73" 10.25"

10.25" 15.73" NOTE: SEE CAMOUFLAGE NOTES ON DETAIL "11/D-1" ANTENNA & RRU MOUNTING N.T.S. SCALE: (N) ANTENNA. SEE DETAIL (N) COAXIAL CABLE JUMPER (N) ANTENNA BRACKET (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS CROSS & SUPPORT ARM ASSEMBLY (N) 3/8" THICK STEEL PLATE & 1/2"Ø U-BOLTS (N) 2"Ø SCHEDULE 40 GALVANIZED STANDARD (ASTM 53 GRADE B) STEEL ANTENNA PIPE MOUNT (N) COMMSCOPE ANTENNA BRACKET (N) RRUS UNITS MOUNTED TO SEPERATE PIPE MOUNTS. SEE DETAIL 8'-0" (N) FAUX FOLIAGE SOCK COVER AROUND ALL ANTENNAS & RRU UNITS 15"± 5° DOWNTILT (2) RRUS PER SECTOR D1 8 D1
1 D1
2 D112 ANTENNA & EQUIPMENT CAMOUFLAGE NOTES: 1. COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B AND ERICSSON KRE 105281/1 ANTENNAS MAY BE COVERED BY RF TRANSPARENT NEEDLE SOCKS. 2. RRU 4449 & 8843 UNITS MAY BE COVERED BY RF TRANSPARENT NEEDLE SOCKS. BUT, MAY NOT BE PAINTED. 3. RAYCAP SURGE SUPPRESSORS MAY BE PAINTED TO MATCH DOMINANT COLOR OF TREE FOLIAGE. 4. ERICSSON AIR6449 ANTENNAS MAY ONLY BE COVERED WITH 3M FILM IN A COLOR THAT MATCHES THE DOMINANT TREE COLOR. ONLY THE FACE AND SIDES MAY RECEIVE FILM. THE BACK OF THESE ANTENNAS MAY NOT BE COVERED, FILMED OR PAINTED. 5. ALL EXPOSED CABLES, BRACKETS & SUPPORTS SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH FAUX TREE FOLIAGE. D1 5 (N) SURGE SUPPRESSOR DISTRIBUTION BOX SEE DETAIL (N) STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING FRAME PROVIDED WITH UNIT INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS (N) (4) 3/8"Ø GALVANIZED FASTENERS FOR MOUNTING FRAME TO DISTRIBUTION BOX SIDE VIEW (N) 3/8" GALVANIZED STEEL MOUNTING PLATE WITH (2) 1/2"Ø A36 GALVANIZED U-BOLTS (N) 2"Ø x 3'-0" LONG SCHEDULE 40 GALVANIZED STANDARD. (ASTM 53 GRADE B) STEEL PIPE MOUNT (N) (2) UNISTRUT P1000T x 16" LONG (TYPICAL) W/(2) 3/8"Ø A-36 GALVANIZED U-BOLTS TO 2"Ø PIPE MOUNT (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS SUPPORT ARM (N) (2) 3/8"Ø GALVANIZED UNISTRUT BOLTS & SPRING NUTS 9D1 SURGE SUPPRESSOR MOUNTING N.T.S. SCALE:
159 10
311
412
6 8 FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW BOTTOM VIEW TOP VIEW CAPACITY AND SPECIFICATIONS - 4TX / 4RX - 6 LTE CARRIERS - UP TO 4x5W - 2x 10.1Gbps CPRI - 120Mhz IBW KRE105281/1 ANTENNA WITH INTEGRAL 4408 B48 DC RRU RADIO UNIT N.T.S. SCALE: 7.87"

4.92" 4.92" 7.87" 8.38" 7.87" 4.92" HEIGHT 8.38 in. (213 mm) WIDTH 7.87 in. (200 mm) DEPTH 4.92 in. (125 mm) WEIGHT 11.02 lbs. (5 Kg) OTHER SPECIFICATIONS - AC or -48 VDC - 2 external alarm - Integrated or external - IP 65, -40 to +55°C antenna

8.38" ERICSSON ANTENNA WITH 4408 RRU RADIO UNITNOTE: SEE CAMOUFLAGE NOTES ON DETAIL "11/D-1" NFPA 704 PLACARDS N.T.S. SCALE:
6'-0"
14" SQUARE BLUE (HEALTH HAZARD)
2 1 0 WHITE (SPECIAL) NUMBERS & LETTERS SHALL BE REFLECTIVE RED (FLAMMABILITY) YELLOW (REACTIVITY) 4'-0"
14" SQUARE BLUE (HEALTH HAZARD)
0 3
2 WHITE (SPECIAL) NUMBERS & LETTERS SHALL BE REFLECTIVE RED (FLAMMABILITY) YELLOW (REACTIVITY) W FOR BATTERIES FOR GENERATOR NOTE: GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM SPECIFIC SIGNAGE AND LOCATION WITH THE RFE / EME STUDY AND THE VERIZON WIRELESS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER BATTERY CAUTION SIGN CAUTION THIS AREA CONTAINS: BATTERY ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS ARE CORROSIVE LIQUIDS ENERGIZED BATTERY SYSTEMS AND ENERGIZED ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS BATTERIES IN CABINETS 1'-6" 1'-4" MICARTA SIGN RED BACKGROUND WITH WHITE LETTERS
3/4" 1" HELVETICA LETTERING 1/2" HELVETICA LETTERING MOUNTING SCREWS N.T.S. SCALE: NOTE: GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM SPECIFIC SIGNAGE AND LOCATION WITH THE RFE / EME STUDY AND THE VERIZON WIRELESS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER RAB LIGHTING: X34-16L/120 LED FLOOD LAMP 1632 LUMENS NOTE: LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE ADJUSTED SO THAT ALL LIGHTING IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SITE 2 5/8" 4 1/4"2 3/4" 1 3/16"
4 11/16" KNUCKLE MOUNT TO 4" x 4" x 2" JUNCTION BOX ANCHORED TO WALL LIGHT FIXTURE FULLY SHIELDED CONDUIT SERVICE LIGHT N.T.S. SCALE: ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS N.T.S. 2 SCALE: FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW BOTTOM VIEW COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B DIMENSIONS, HxWxD: 96" x 11.9" x 7.1" WEIGHT: 51.6 lbs RF CONNECTORS: (6) 7-16 DIN FEMALE / BOTTOM 11.9" 7.1"

96.0" 11.9" 7.1" NOTE: SEE CAMOUFLAGE NOTES ON DETAIL "11/D-1" ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS NONE SCALE:

31.3" 16.1" PLAN VIEW FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW ERICSSON AIR 6419 DIMENSIONS, HxWxD: 31.3" x 16.1" x 9.8" WEIGHT: 63.05 lbs 9.8" 16.1" 9.8" NOTE: SEE CAMOUFLAGE NOTES ON DETAIL "11/D-1" RRU 4490 SPECIFICATIONS N.T.S. SCALE: TOP VIEW FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW

20.6" 15.7" B5: 4X60W, B13; 4X60W 480 W TOTAL RF OUTPUT POWER L, NR, NB-IoT 2x 2.5/4.9/9.8/10.1/24.3 Gbps CPRI/eCPRI HEIGHT 20.6 in. (522 mm) WIDTH 15.7 in. (397 mm) DEPTH 7.0 in. (178 mm) WEIGHT 68.4 lbs. (31.0 Kg) -48 VDC 2-WIRE (ONE DC CONNECTOR INPUT) AISG V3.0 TMA & RET SUPPORT VIA RS-485 OR RF CONNECTORS TYPE 4.3-10 RF + CONNECTORS 2 EXTERNAL ALARMS CONVECTIONAL COOLING OPTIONAL FAN FOR INCREASED SITE FLEXIBILITY IP 65, -40 TO +55 °C RADIO 4490 4 COMMON RF PORTS (C)

20.6" 7.0"

7.0" 15.7" NOTE: SEE CAMOUFLAGE NOTES ON DETAIL "11/D-1" RADIO 4890 SPECIFICATIONS N.T.S. SCALE: RADIO 4890 B2: 4X60W B66: 4X60W UP TO 480W IN TOTAL RF POWER L, NR, NB-IoT 2x 2.5/4.9/9.8/10.1/24.3 Gbps CPRI/eCPRI HEIGHT 20.6 in. (522 mm) WIDTH 15.7 in. (397 mm) -48 VDC 2-WIRE (SINGLE DC-CONNECTOR), AISG V3.0 TMA & RET SUPPORT VIA RS-485 OR RF CONNECTORS TYPE 4.3-10 RF + CONNECTORS 2 EXTERNAL ALARMS CONVECTIONAL COOLING OPTIONAL FAN FOR INCREASED SITE FLEXIBILITY IP 65, -40 TO +55 °C 8 RF PORTS, 4T8R PER BAND (S FOR TX) TOP VIEW FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW

20.6" 15.7"

20.6" 7.2"

7.2" 15.7" DEPTH 7.2 in. (182 mm) WEIGHT 69.5 lbs. (31.5 Kg) NOTE: SEE CAMOUFLAGE NOTES ON DETAIL "11/D-1" Page 2489 of 2543 DATE: 05/28/2025
TO: Honorable Chair and Commissioners
FROM: Planning and Development Department
2025-203
APPLICATION REQUEST:

CUPM2024-0002: Application to modify Conditional Use Permit CUP92-02 to replace an existing 62-foot-tall wireless telecommunication tower with a new 67-foot-tall wireless telecommunications tower disguised as a eucalyptus tree, located at 1660 Leeson Lane (APN 107-320-015) in the M-3 (Heavy Manufacturing) Zone. (Applicant: Kerrigan Diehl, Plancom Inc. on behalf of Verizon Wireless, 16776 Bernardo Center Drive #203, San Diego, CA 92128)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the Planning and Housing Commission find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302(c), and adopt Resolution No. 2667, GRANTING CUPM2024-0002 based on the findings contained in the staff report and conditions of approval.

PROJECT SITE SUMMARY:

Area of Property: 5.87 acres
Existing Zoning: M-3 (Heavy Manufacturing)
Existing General Plan: GI (General Industrial)
Existing Land Use: GI (General Industrial)
Proposed Land Use: GI (General Industrial)
Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses:

N: M-3 (Heavy Manufacturing) / Vacant
E: M-3 (Heavy Manufacturing) / Industrial

Page 2490 of 2543 ends

S: M-3 (Heavy Manufacturing) / Industrial
W: M-3 (Heavy Manufacturing) / Vacant

BACKGROUND
Project Background
Conditional Use Permit Modification CUPM2024-0002 was submitted to the City on April 30, 2024 and reviewed by the Project and Environmental Review Committee on July 3, 2024. The proposal was submitted by Plancom Inc. on behalf of Verizon Wireless to demolish an existing wireless telecommunications facility comprised of a 62-foot-tall monopole and associated ground equipment and construct a replacement tower designed as a eucalyptus tree (“mono-eucalyptus”) in conjunction with a new walled enclosure containing accessory equipment. The project site is located at 1660 Leeson Lane and zoned M-3 which is a heavy manufacturing zone (Exhibit 2). The site is currently developed with an industrial building owned and operated by the Mission Rubber Company.

The property’s existing monopole was approved in 1992 pursuant to CUP92-02, with the tower portion of the structure owned by American Tower Company (ATC). The mounted antennas and associated ground equipment are owned and operated by Verizon Wireless.

Mission Rubber Company has requested that the monopole be moved, and so with forthcoming demolition, Verizon has proposed construction of a new towerto be located just slightly to the east of the existing tower but ultimately within the same property.

To ensure that no service interruptions occur during construction of the new monoeucalyptus, Verizon proposes construction and temporary operation of a 62-foot-tall monopole, with associated ground-mounted equipment located adjacent to the proposed (permanent) tower. The temporary facility would be operational for no more than two years from the approval date of this CUP and removed from the property either upon expiration of the CUP at the end of the permit’s two-year term or prior to Verizon receiving final release for the new mono-eucalyptus, whichever comes first.

The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) which is a regulatory document created by the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) focusing on the preservation of land to support threatened plants and wildlife. Certain properties within the MSHCP have been determined to have a greater likelihood to contain such species and are designated as “Criteria Cells,” requiring that proposed development complete a Joint Project Review (JPR) with the RCA to determine whether any set-aside and permanent conservation of land is required. As the subject property is located within Criteria Cell No. 1826, a Biological Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis was prepared by Merkel & Associated, Inc. (March 2025) and submitted to the RCA for review as JPR25-02-12-03. On March 31, 2025, the RCA determined the proposed scope of work to be consistent with all criteria enumerated in the MSHCP and that no conservation of land is required.

Page 2491 of 2543 ends

Local and Federal Regulations
Telecommunications facilities are currently allowed within any zone. Per the City’s adopted Location, Development, and Design Guidelines and Standards for Telecommunications Facilities, the preferred order of location shall be: 1) industrial zones, and then 2) commercial zones. The Guidelines also state that such facilities should be indistinguishable from their surrounding environment and placed in locations where existing topography, vegetation, buildings or other structures provide the greatest amount of screening. The Guidelines dictate that support structures for telecommunications facilities must be screened from view by placing them next to tall buildings or structures, or near existing tall trees and other dense landscaping. Although there are no trees on the project site, several mature eucalyptus and pine trees are located approximately 300 feet to the east along South Temescal Street.

Telecommunications facilities are also regulated nationally by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Telecommunications Act of 1996. When considering and determining an application for the establishment of a new facility, it should be noted that local government is prohibited by law from considering health effects from radio frequency emissions.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CUPM2024-0002 is an application to remove and replace an existing telecommunications facility with a new facility designed as a mono-eucalyptus to stand 67 feet tall on a 5.87-acre project site. The following sections discuss the proposal in greater detail.

Site Plan
As shown in the project Site Plan (Exhibit 3, Sheets A-0 and A-1), the proposed monoeucalyptus is located on the southeastern corner of the project site, which is also the rear of the property. A 271-square-foot enclosure containing accessory equipment and surrounded by an eight-foot-tall block wall is also proposed and would be located adjacent to the new tower. More broadly, all proposed development would be located approximately 680 feet south of Leeson Lane, 330 feet west of South Temescal Street, and 1,000 feet from (street) All American Way.

17.65.060 [a]). The centerline of the mono-eucalyptus pole would be located 15 feet from the side and 34 feet from the rear property lines and exceed the maximum height of the zone by 12 feet.

Updated service coverage with the installation of the new tower is illustrated in propagation maps attached as Exhibit 6. Before and during construction of the new 67-foot tall monoeucalyptus, a 62-foot-tall temporary monopole intended to maintain Verizon’s provision of

Page 2492 of 2543 ends

service is proposed adjacent to the location of the permanent facility. The temporary tower and associated equipment would be surrounded by a temporary eight-foot-tall chain-link enclosure. Plans for the temporary facility are attached as Exhibit 4.

Antennas and Screening
The mono-eucalyptus is comprised of a support pole - serving as the “trunk” of the faux tree - and three separate, mounted antenna sectors. There will be a total of 12 antenna panels, six Remote Radio Units (RRU), and three Raycap surge suppressor units mounted onto the antenna sectors, all at a height of 62 feet above grade level. Additionally, a microwave antenna measuring a four-feet in diameter will be mounted onto the support pole at a height of approximately 48 feet. Numerous faux branches will be mounted to the tower’s support pole, projecting outward to a minimum of one foot, six inches beyond the extent of all antennas. The antenna panels, RRUs, Raycap units and microwave antenna are required to be painted green to match the color of the branches. Additionally, the antennas are required to be covered with “socks” that are textured to match the tree’s foliage. The screening elements are standard requirements for faux tree designs. The antenna layout plan and elevations for the mono-eucalyptus are attached as Exhibit 3, Sheets A-3 and A-4; photosimulations of the tower are attached as Exhibit 5.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

FISCAL IMPACT
The applicant has paid the applicable application processing fees for the project.

PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS

Page 2493 of 2543 ends

A 10-day public notice was mailed to all property owners within a 500-foot radius of the project site, as well as advertised in the Sentinel Weekly News and posted at the project site.

As of the preparation of this report, the Planning and Development Department has not received any correspondence regarding the subject project.

STAFF ANALYSIS
The project has been found to comply with all development standards enumerated within the Corona Municipal Code and the Location, Development, and Design Guidelines and Standards for Telecommunications Facilities, which prioritize industrial zones as the preferred location for telecommunications facilities and require towers to be disguised so that they blend with their surroundings. Existing live eucalyptus trees are located along nearby Temescal Street, helping the mono-eucalyptus blend with its environment. Also, the tower’s eucalyptus design would improve the aesthetics of the tower compared to the existing wood monopole design which incorporates no stealth elements.

The project site is capable of accommodating the new tower, associated accessory equipment, as well as the temporary tower. Planning Condition No. 14 ensures that the temporary tower will be removed within a certain timeframe whether the permanent tower is constructed or not. The project site is immediately surrounded by industrial land uses.

The nearest residential land use is a mobile-home park which is located approximately 380 feet to the east and separated from the project site by industrial buildings and Temescal Street. Therefore, visual impacts related to the new telecommunications facility are expected to be minimal.

The Planning and Development Department recommends approval of CUPM2024-0002 based on the findings of approval below and the recommended conditions of approval attached as Exhibit 7.

FINDINGS OF APPROVAL FOR CUPM2024-0002

1. A preliminary exemption assessment has been conducted by the City of Corona and determined that the project does not require further environmental assessment as it qualifies for a Class 2 Categorical Exemption per Section 15302(c) of the State Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 3.31 of the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines. According to the State Guidelines, Class 2 categorical exemptions consist of the replacement or reconstruction of existing facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the replaced structure and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. The project proposes the replacement of an existing wireless facility with a new facility of substantially the same size, purpose and capacity.

Page 2494 of 2543 ends

2. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110 (a) of the CMC, the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare and will be in harmony with the various elements and objectives in the city’s General Plan for the following reasons:
a. Radiofrequency emissions from the installation of telecommunications facilities are found to comply with the limits placed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for human exposure.
b. The proposed telecommunications facility is required to adhere to FCC regulations, and the applicant is required to obtain all required permits from local and federal agencies prior to construction.
c. The telecommunications facility is consistent with the General Plan Policy IU8.2 in that it provides for continued development and expansion of telecommunication systems for users within the service radius of the telecommunications facility.

3. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110(b) of the CMC, the proposed use is not detrimental to the other existing and permitted uses in the general area of the project site, and it relates properly to the surrounding roadways for the following reasons:
a. The wireless telecommunications facility is located on property zoned M-3, Heavy Manufacturing, consisting of an existing single-story building, parking lot, onsite loading activities and landscaping, which is similar to the existing land uses and development in the general area as the surrounding properties are also zoned M-3 and developed similar to the project site. b. The wireless telecommunications facility adheres to the City’s Wireless Telecommunications Design Guidelines because it is designed to resemble a eucalyptus tree, making it indistinguishable from the surrounding environment and utilizing state-of-the-art technology, to integrate with the surrounding environment.
c. The wireless telecommunications facility is required to meet FCC regulations, and the building standards of the California Building Code in order not to impact the use of the project site and the uses surrounding the project site. d. The wireless telecommunications facility will not impact the existing circulation system because a service technician will only be visiting the site periodically throughout the year, and the site provides access through Leeson

Page 2495 of 2543 ends

Lane to accommodate such activity. Therefore, such use does not impact the level of service on the surrounding streets.

4. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110 (c) of the CMC, reasonable conditions of approval have been imposed on the proposed use to protect public health, safety, and welfare and to ensure compliance with the applicable rules and regulations for telecommunications facilities, the development standards of the M-3 (Heavy Manufacturing) zone, the requirements of Chapter 17.65, Telecommunications Facilities, and compliance with the City Wireless Telecommunications Design Guidelines.

5. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110 (d) of the CMC, the exercise of the proposed use adheres to all property development standards of the zone in which said use is conditionally permitted for the following reasons:
a. The location of the telecommunications facility on the project site meets all building setbacks as required by the M-3 zone.
b. The 67-foot tall telecommunications facility is consistent with the M-3 zoning requirements of Title 17 because CMC Section 17.65.060 (a) allows the height of the telecommunications facility to exceed the maximum height prescribed by the property’s underlying zone with approval of a conditional use permit. c. The appearance of the telecommunications facility as a mono-eucalyptus tree meets the requirements of the design guidelines and standards adopted pursuant to CMC Section 17.65.090 as it would serve to make the facility indistinguishable from the surrounding environment and; the equipment affiliated with the telecommunications facility will be screened by an eightfoot-tall block wall enclosure.

PREPARED BY: BRENDAN DALDE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
REVIEWED BY: EVAN LANGAN, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
REVIEWED BY: SANDRA VANIAN, PLANNING MANAGER
SUBMITTED BY: JOANNE COLETTA, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Exhibits:

1. Resolution No. 2667

2. Locational and Zoning Map

Page 2496 of 2543 ends

3. Site Plan, Elevations, Antenna & Equipment Layout

4. Temporary Site Plan, Elevations, Antenna & Equipment Layout

5. Photo-simulations

6. Propagation Maps

7. Conditions of Approval

8. Applicant’s Project Narrative Documentation, dated October 23, 2024

9. Environmental Documentation
Case Planner: Brendan Dalde (951) 739-4918

Page 2497 of 2543 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2667
APPLICATION NUMBER: CUPM2024-0002

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND HOUSING

COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CORONA,

CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
MODIFICATION 2024-0002 (CUPM2024-0002), AN
APPLICATION TO MODIFY CUP92-02 TO REPLACE AN
EXISTING 62-FOOT-TALL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER WITH A NEW 67-FOOTTALL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER

DISGUISED AS A EUCALYPTUS TREE, LOCATED AT
1660 LEESON LANE (APN 107-320-015) IN THE M-3
(HEAVY MANUFACTURING) ZONE. (APPLICANT:

KERRIGAN DIEHL, PLANCOM INC. ON BEHALF OF

VERIZON WIRELESS)
WHEREAS, the application to the City of Corona, California, for a Conditional Use Permit Modification 2024-0002 (CUPM2024-0002) to modify CUP92-02 under the provisions of Chapter 17.92 in the Corona Municipal Code, has been duly submitted to said City's Planning and Housing Commission to replace an existing 62-foot-tall wireless telecommunication tower originally approved in 1992 with a new 67-foot-tall wireless telecommunications tower disguised as a eucalyptus tree, located at 1660 Leeson Lane (APN 107-320-015) in the M-3 (Heavy Manufacturing) Zone; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Housing Commission held a noticed public hearing for CUPM2024-0002 on May 28, 2025, as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Housing Commission finds that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15302(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines and Section 3.31 of the City of Corona Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA because there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, after close of said hearing, the Commission by formal action, found that all the conditions necessary to granting the Conditional Use Permit Modification as set forth

Page 2498 of 2543 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2667
APPLICATION NO. CUPM2024-0002
PAGE | 2
in Corona Municipal Code Section 17.92.110 do exist in reference to CUPM2024-0002 based on the evidence presented to the Commission during said hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Housing Commission based its recommendation to approve CUPM2024-0002 on certain conditions of approval and the findings set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. CEQA Findings. As the decision-making body for CUPM2024- 0002, the Planning and Housing Commission has determined that this project does not require further environmental assessment because the project qualifies as a categorical exemption under CEQA per Section 15302(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines and Section 3.31 of the City of Corona adopted Local Guidelines for implementing CEQA. There is no evidence presented to the city that the project will have any significant effects on the environment.

SECTION 2. Conditional Use Permit Modification Findings. Pursuant to Corona Municipal Code (“CMC”) Section 17.92.110 and based on the entire record before the Planning and Housing Commission, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, the Commission hereby makes and adopts the following findings:

Page 2499 of 2543 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2667
APPLICATION NO. CUPM2024-0002
PAGE | 3
in that it provides for continued development and expansion of telecommunication systems for users within the service radius of the telecommunications facility.

3. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110(b) of the CMC, the proposed use is not detrimental to the other existing and permitted uses in the general area of the project site, and it relates properly to the surrounding roadways for the following reasons:
a. The wireless telecommunications facility is located on property zoned M-3, Heavy Manufacturing, consisting of an existing single-story building, parking lot, onsite loading activities and landscaping, which is similar to the existing land uses and development in the general area as the surrounding properties are also zoned M3 and developed similar to the project site. b. The wireless telecommunications facility adheres to the City’s Wireless Telecommunications Design Guidelines because it is designed to resemble a eucalyptus tree, making it indistinguishable from the surrounding environment and utilizing state-of-the-art technology, to integrate with the surrounding environment.
c. The wireless telecommunications facility is required to meet FCC regulations, and the building standards of the California Building Code in order not to impact the use of the project site and the uses surrounding the project site. d. The wireless telecommunications facility will not impact the existing circulation system because a service technician will only be visiting the site periodically throughout the year, and the site provides access through Leeson Lane to accommodate such activity. Therefore, such use does not impact the level of service on the surrounding streets.

Page 2500 of 2543 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2667
APPLICATION NO. CUPM2024-0002
PAGE | 4
property’s underlying zone with approval of a conditional use permit. c. The appearance of the telecommunications facility as a mono-eucalyptus tree meets the requirements of the design guidelines and standards adopted pursuant to CMC Section 17.65.090 as it would serve to make the facility indistinguishable from the surrounding environment and; the equipment affiliated with the telecommunications facility will be screened by an eight-foot-tall block wall enclosure.

SECTION 3. Effective Date. CUPM2024-0002 will not become effective until the City Council either takes no action on the report or otherwise makes a decision after a City Council initiated review.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered to the City Clerk of said City and a copy thereof be sent to the applicant therefore at the address of said applicant as set forth in the application for said Conditional Use Permit Modification.

Page 2501 of 2543 ends

Page 2502 of 2543 ends

AERIAL & LOCATIONAL MAP
CZ2022-0004 & GPA2022-0004

PROMENADE AVE NEAR SIXTH
STREET
Project
Site C3 MP County of Riverside M3
CUPM2024-0002
1660 Leeson Lane
Dudley Way
Magnolia Avenue
M3
South Temescal Street
Land Use Legend:

M3 - Heavy Manufacturing
C3 - General Community
Commercial
MP - Mobile Home Park
M3 Leeson Lane

Page 2503 of 2543 ends

O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP

O/HP O/HP O/HP O/HP
O/HP
O/HP O/HP O/HP E E F F TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT 16776 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE, UNIT 203 SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE

BUILDING C
IRVINE, CA 92618 SHEET TITLE: ISSUE STATUS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY

E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E F F

F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F
F F F
E E E E E E E E F F F F F F F F F TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT 16776 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE, UNIT 203 SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE

BUILDING C
IRVINE, CA 92618 SHEET TITLE: ISSUE STATUS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY

MAGNETIC
NORTH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0" 2' 4' 8'
6'-0" SCE UTILITIES

EASEMENT
23'-4"
5'-0"
10'-5"
12"
14'-0"
15'-0"
1 AREA: 271 SQ. FT. KEYED NOTES:
2784631 (N) 4'-0" WIDE x 8'-0" HIGH STEEL PICKET GATE WITH VERIZON SIGNAGE ON ADJACENT WALL. SEE DETAILS911 (N) E/911 GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO (N) EQUIPMENT CABINET EXTEND MINIMUM 12" ABOVE TOP OF WALL 121314 REMOVE (E) CONCRETE LANDING & STEPS 15 (N) MAIN GROUND BUS BAR MOUNTED TO INSIDE FACE OF CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE WALL 16 (N) (4) 4"Ø CABLE CONDUIT & (1) 1-1/2"Ø CONDUIT FOR GROUND 17182021 4D1
3D1 19 PROVIDE 4" x 8" OPENING AT BASE OF WALL FOR DRAINAGE (TYPICAL OF 3) (N) 6 GAUGE INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL CHAIN LINK LID WITH 2" MESH OPENING 10 (N) VERIZON CABLE TRENCH TO TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS (SHOWN DASHED) (N) VERIZON WALL MOUNTED FIBER CABINET (N) PERMANENT VERIZON 8'-0" TALL CONCRETE BLOCK EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE 2'-8" WIDE x 4'-0" HIGH VENTILATION OPENING WITH STEEL FRAME & PICKETS @ 4" O.C. (N) PERMANENT VERIZON 67'-0" HIGH TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS & FOOTING. SEE SHEET A-3 FOR ANTENNA PLAN & TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS ELEVATION (N) CONCRETE SLAB (N) 17" x 30" FIBER HAND HOLE WITH BOLT-DOWN CONCRETE COVER 5 9
4 2
3 6 20 30
7 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 24282926272522233032333431 (E) CONTOUR LINES @1-0" INTERVALS (E) OVERHEAD UTLITY LINES 353637 PROPERTY LINE, TYPICAL REMOVE (E) VERIZON 62'-0" HIGH WOOD POLE WITH ANTENNAS, RRUS, MOUNTING BRACKETS & CABLES (SHOWN DASHED) REMOVE (E) VERIZON CHAIN LINK FENCE ENCLOSURE AROUND WOOD POLE AND PARTIAL CHAIN LINK FENCE ON SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY (SHOWN DASHED) (E) LIGHT STANDARD TO REMAIN (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH BARBED WIRE TO REMAIN (E) CONCRETE BLOCK WALL TO REMAIN (E) CONCRETE LOADING PAD TO REMAIN 19 RELOCATED SCE ELECTRICAL METER 22 23 21 32 34 658.00'
657.00' 35 36 35 38 37 39 43 43 (N) VERIZON WALL MOUNTED INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER (ILC) (N) TRENCH FOR POWER & FIBER REMOVE (E) VERIZON EQUIPMENT BUILDING INCLUDING ALL INTERIOR EQUIPMENT, CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS, PADS & LANDINGS (SHOWN DASHED) (N) SERVICE LIGHT FIXTURE 10D1 17 21 24'-0" 25 26 31 24 25 26 REROUTE (E) OVERHEAD VERIZON ELECTRICAL SERVICE FROM (E) UTILITY POLE UNDERGROUND TO (TEMP) & TO (N) EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE REROUTE (E) OVERHEAD VERIZON FIBER SERVICE FROM (E) UTILITY POLE UNDERGROUND TO (TEMP) & (N) EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE (N) 17" x 30" HANDHOLES WITH CONCRETE COVER (3) FOR FIBER, (3) FOR POWER, (6) TOTAL 33 33 404142 (N) CONDUIT & CONDUCTORS IN TRENCH TO (E) LIGHT STANDARD 32 28 (N) VERIZON BATTERY CABINET. CABINET SHALL BE "HARDENED" WITH STAINLESS STEEL PROTECTION ASSEMBLY WITH MASTER KEYED HIDDEN SHACKLE PADLOCK WITH HIGH SECURITY HASP PER NETWORK ASSURANCE (N) VERIZON POWER PLANT / EQUIPMENT CABINET WITH BATTERIES IN THE BOTTOM. CABINET SHALL BE "HARDENED" WITH STAINLESS STEEL PROTECTION ASSEMBLY WITH MASTER KEYED HIDDEN SHACKLE PADLOCK WITH HIGH SECURITY HASP PER NETWORK ASSURANCE FUTURE VERIZON CABINET (SHOWN DASHED) 3'-0"
2'-8"
3'-4"
3'-0"
12"
3'-0"
12"
3'-0"
2'-0"
5 2'-2"
8'-6"
2'-0" (N) VERIZON 30KW AC STAND-BY GENERATOR WITH 221 GALLON SEISMIC DOUBLE WALL DIESEL FUEL TANK 7'-10"
3'-4"
72'-0"
5'-3" (N) VERIZON WALL MOUNTED FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH 29 UTILITY CONDUIT IN TRENCH FOR TEMP SITE (E) CONCRETE DRAINAGE SWALE (E) DRAINAGE PATTERN 41 (E) CONCRETE FILLED BOLLARDS TO REMAIN (TYPICAL) (E) PROPANE TANKS INSIDE METAL STORAGE CAGES TO REMAIN 38 39 41 41 41 658.10' F.G. 657.7' F.G.
658.7' F.G.
659.91' (E)
658.80' F.G. FINISHED SLAB: 658.4'
658.00' F.G. 658.15' F.G. 657.80' F.G. (E) ABANDONED FUEL TANK TO BE REMOVED BY OWNER (SHOWN DASHED) 43 42 10 41 8 41 27 44 (E) GRAVEL & COMPACTED EARTH AROUND (E) VERIZON SHELTER & POLE 44 40 TEMPORARY SITE PROPOSED TEMPORARY VERIZON EQUIPMENT ON A CONCRETE BALLASTED BASE WITH A 62'-0" MONOPOLE. SEE SHEETS A6 - A12. Page 2506 of 2543 ERICSSON TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT 16776 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE, UNIT 203 SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE

BUILDING C
IRVINE, CA 92618 SHEET TITLE: ISSUE STATUS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY

TEMESCANYON
1660 LEESON LANE
CORONA, CA 92879 0 02/28/2023 90% ZD REVIEW RL 1 06/02/2023 90% ZD DRM COMMENTS RL 234567 06/26/2023 11/06/2032 12/18/2023 01/10/2024 08/16/2024 10/21/2024 100% ZD ENCL. SIZE INCREASE REVISED 90% ZD 100% ZD CITY STAFF COMMENTS COMBINED PERM & TEMP RL RL RL RL RL RL A-3 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON PROJECT I.D. : 17276944 PERMANENT TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS ELEVATION & ANTENNA PLAN 0" 2' 4' 8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" MAGNETIC NORTH 8'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" GAMMA SECTOR AZIMUTH 0° APPROXIMATE OUTLINE OF (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS BRANCHES AT ANTENNA LEVEL 11D1 TYPICAL (N) SURGE SUPPRESSOR MOUNTED TO CROSS ARM. (TYPICAL OF 3) SEE DETAILS 9D1 6D1 (N) RRUS UNITS. TWO (2) PER SECTOR (TOTAL OF 6) MOUNTED TO CROSS ARM BEHIND ANTENNAS. SEE DETAIL 8D1 12D1 (N) GALVANIZED STEEL ANTENNA SUPPORT ARM (TYPICAL) (N) GALVANIZED STEEL ANTENNA CROSS ARM (TYPICAL) ALPHA SECTOR AZIMUTH 120° BETA SECTOR AZIMUTH 240° 22'-0" 1'-6" MIN. EXTENSION OF BRANCHES BEYOND ANTENNAS IN DOWNTILT POSITION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" (N) (4) 4"Ø CABLE CONDUIT & (1) 1-1/2"Ø CONDUIT FOR GROUND PROVIDE (2) 9" x 24" HANDHOLES AT BASE WITH COVERS (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS "TRUNK" WITH BARK TEXTURE 1AA3 1'-6" MIN. EXTENSION OF BRANCHES BEYOND ANTENNAS IN DOWNTILT POSITION 657.81' A.M.S.L. 0'-0" A.G.L. TOP OF (N) CAISSON CENTERLINE OF HANDHOLES 1BA3 PROVIDE (3) (N) 6" x 12" HANDHOLES (E) GRADE (N) CONCRETE FOOTING. TYPE (MAT OR CAISSON) AND REINFORCING PER TREE MANUFACTURER'S DESIGN 67'-0" 62'-0" 61'-6" 60'-8" 58'-0" 2'-0"
3'-0" BOTTOM OF (N) BRANCHES TOP OF BARK TEXTURE TRUNK ABOVE TO BE PAINTED DARK BROWN 6" 5'-0" 22'-6" 724.81' A.M.S.L. 67'-0" A.G.L. 719.81' A.M.S.L. 62'-0" A.G.L. 715.81' A.M.S.L. 58'-0" A.G.L. TOP OF TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS BRANCHES (HIGHEST POINT / FIXED FIXTURE) TOP OF (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS TRUNK & TOP OF (N) VERIZON ANTENNAS RAD CENTER OF (N) VERIZON ANTENNAS CENTERLINE OF HANDHOLES 22'-0" PERMANENT TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS ELEVATION ANTENNA & EQUIPMENT CAMOUFLAGE NOTES: 1. COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B AND ERICSSON KRE 105281/1 ANTENNAS MAY BE COVERED BY RF TRANSPARENT NEEDLE SOCKS. 2. RRU 4449 & 8843 UNITS MAY BE COVERED BY RF TRANSPARENT NEEDLE SOCKS. BUT, MAY NOT BE PAINTED. 3. RAYCAP SURGE SUPPRESSORS MAY BE PAINTED TO MATCH DOMINANT COLOR OF TREE FOLIAGE. 4. ERICSSON AIR6449 ANTENNAS MAY ONLY BE COVERED WITH 3M FILM IN A COLOR THAT MATCHES THE DOMINANT TREE COLOR. ONLY THE FACE AND SIDES MAY RECEIVE FILM. THE BACK OF THESE ANTENNAS MAY NOT BE COVERED, FILMED OR PAINTED. 5. ALL EXPOSED CABLES, BRACKETS & SUPPORTS SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH FAUX TREE FOLIAGE. 11D1 11D1 48'-0" CENTERLINE OF MICROWAVE MICROWAVE AZIMUTH TBD° PER SECTOR OF CABLES NUMBER COAX. CABLE JUMPER (+ / - 5') (+ / - 3') LENGTH LENGTH RADIO TYPE 6'-0" SECTOR DIRECTION AZIMUTH BETA2 BETA1 240° 0° GAMMA1 GAMMA2 MODEL CENTER RAD NOTES: INSTALL (1) 6 x 12 HYBRID FIBER POWER CABLE FOR EACH SECTOR (TOTAL OF 3) INSTALL (1) DEMARCATION JUNCTION BOX (RAYCAP SURGE SUPPRESSOR) FOR EACH SECTOR (TOTAL OF 3) SEE DETAIL INSTALL (16) ANTENNAS: (3) ERICSSON KRE105281/1: 8.4" LENGTH X 7.9" WIDE X 4.9" DEEP, WEIGHT: 11.0 LBS (6) COMMSCOPE NHH-65C-R2B: 96.0" LENGTH x 11.9" WIDE x .7.1" DEEP, WEIGHT: 51.6 LBS (3) ERICSSON AIR6419: 31.3" LENGTH X 16.1" WIDE X 9.8" DEEP, WEIGHT: 71.0 LBS INSTALL (2) RRU UNITS FOR EACH SECTOR, (TOTAL OF 6). SEE DETAILS 1234 SIZE 2 SURGE SUPPRESSOR 3(1) 1 4 BETA3 BETA4 GAMMA3 GAMMA4 RFDS T.B.D. INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA (1) RRU 4890 (1) RRU 4490 (1) 6'-0" INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA (1) RRU 4890 (1) RRU 4490 6'-0" ALPHA1 120° (1) (1) 6 X 12 HYBRID CABLE ERICSSON: AIR6419 31.3" L x 16.1" W x 9.8" D 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNA (1) RRU 4890 (1) RRU 4490 COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 85'-0" ALPHA2 ALPHA3 ALPHA4 SOUTHEAST SOUTHWEST NORTH ERICSSON: KRE105281/1 8.4" L x 7.9" W x 4.9" D (1) 6 X 12 HYBRID CABLE (1) 6 X 12 HYBRID CABLE MICROWAVE TBD TBD 4'-0"Ø 48'-0" 32'-0" COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D ERICSSON: AIR6419 31.3" L x 16.1" W x 9.8" D COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D 85'-0" ERICSSON: KRE105281/1 8.4" L x 7.9" W x 4.9" D COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D ERICSSON: AIR6419 31.3" L x 16.1" W x 9.8" D COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D 85'-0" ERICSSON: KRE105281/1 8.4" L x 7.9" W x 4.9" D COMMSCOPE: NHH-65C-R2B 96.0" L X 11.9" W X 7.1" D 61'-6" 58'-0" 60'-8" 61'-6" 58'-0" 60'-8" 61'-6" 58'-0" 60'-8" 6D1 9D1 1D1 2D1 5D1 8D1 12D1 5 4408-B48 RRU UNITS ARE INTEGRAL WITH KRE105281/1 ANTENNAS 5 UPPER TRUNK REFERENCE 1A3 A (N) TRUNK PLAN AT BASE N.T.S. 1 SCALE: HANDHOLE DETAIL N MAGNETIC NORTH 284° (2) 6" x 12" (N) HANDHOLE EACH UPPER TRUNK (N) 10.75"Ø UPPER TRUNK TRUNK 0°, 120° TRUNK 120°, 240° TRUNK 240°, 0° NOTE: ANTENNA AZIMUTHS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. TWO UPPER PORTS ARE TYPICAL EACH UPPER TRUNK (SEE ANTENNA PLAN) (SEE ANTENNA PLAN) (SEE ANTENNA PLAN) AZIMUTH PER PLAN (2) 9" x 24" (N) HANDHOLES AZIMUTH PER PLAN 104° B (N) TRUNK PLAN AT HANDHOLES @ 56'-0" (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS UPPER LEVEL TRUNKS (TYPICAL) 6 RRU UNITS AT ERICSSON AIR6419 ARE INTEGRAL WITH ANTENNAS 6 (N) TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS TRUNK @ 3'-0" PERMANENT SITE (N) VERIZON ANTENNAS & RRU RADIO UNITS MOUNTED ON A (N) 67'-0" HIGH TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS. SEE TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS ELEVATION ON THIS SHEET PERMANENT ANTENNA PLAN PERMANENT SITE (N) VERIZON 4'-0" Ø MICROWAVE ANTENNA ON (N) 67'-0" HIGH TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS PERMANENT SITE (N) VERIZON 4'-0" Ø MICROWAVE ANTENNA ON (N) 67'-0" HIGH TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS PERMANENT SITE (N) VERIZON ANTENNAS & RRU RADIO UNITS MOUNTED ON UPPER TRUNKS OF TRI-TRUNK-EUCALYPTUS Page 2507 of 2543 ERICSSON TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT 16776 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE, UNIT 203 SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE

BUILDING C
IRVINE, CA 92618 SHEET TITLE: ISSUE STATUS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY

19.18"

19.18" 15.73" 10.25"

96.0" 11.9" 7.1" NOTE: SEE CAMOUFLAGE NOTES ON DETAIL "11/D-1" ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS NONE SCALE:

20.6" 7.0"

20.6" 15.7"

20.6" 7.2"

7.2" 15.7" DEPTH 7.2 in. (182 mm) WEIGHT 69.5 lbs. (31.5 Kg) NOTE: SEE CAMOUFLAGE NOTES ON DETAIL "11/D-1" Page 2510 of 2543 O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP
O/HP

O/HP O/HP O/HP O/HP
O/HP
O/HP O/HP O/HP E E F F TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT 16776 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE, UNIT 203 SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE

BUILDING C
IRVINE, CA 92618 SHEET TITLE: ISSUE STATUS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY

Page 2519 of 2543 ends

Page 2520 of 2543 ends

ATC TEMESCANYON
Propagation Map
Confidential and proprietary materials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only. Use, disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement.

May 8, 2025

Page 2521 of 2543 ends

Overview Map
2 Confidential and proprietary materials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only. Use, disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement.

Page 2522 of 2543 ends

Verizon Coverage without ATC TEMESCANYON
3 Confidential and proprietary materials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only. Use, disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement.

Page 2523 of 2543 ends

Verizon Coverage with ATC TEMESCANYON
4 Confidential and proprietary materials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only. Use, disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement.

Page 2524 of 2543 ends

ATC TEMESCANYON Coverage Only
5 Confidential and proprietary materials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only. Use, disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement.

Page 2525 of 2543 ends

Details: Application to modify Conditional Use Permit CUP92-02 to replace an existing 62-foot-tall wireless telecommunication tower with a new 67-foot-tall wireless telecommunications tower disguised as a eucalyptus tree, located at 1660 Leeson Lane (APN 107-320-015) in the M-3 (Heavy Manufacturing) Zone.

LIST OF CONDITIONS

DEPARTMENT CONTACT
BUILDING Anthony Hurley

1. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 pm to 7:00 am, Monday thru Saturday and 6:00 pm to 10:00 am on Sundays and Federal Holidays.

2. The Project shall be designed to show compliance with the latest adopted edition of the following codes as applicable:

A. California Building Code
B. California Residential Code
C. California Electrical Code
D. California Mechanical Code
E. California Plumbing Code
F. California Energy Code
G. California Fire Code
H. California Green Building Standards Code
I. Including local amendments, and the Corona Municipal Code

3. At the time of Building Plan Check submittal, the applicant shall comply with the citys plan check submittal requirements which includes the following: Plot Plan * Foundation Plan * Floor Plan * Ceiling and roof framing plan * Electrical Plans (electrical service shall be underground per Corona Municipal Code chapter 15.60), including size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, single line diagram, circuit schedule and demand load calculations * Plumbing plans including sewer or septic tank location, minimum number of plumbing fixture calculations, isometric diagram including underground piping, water and drainage fixture unit calculations and pipe sizing including meter and building supply, gas piping and roof venting plan * Mechanical plan, heating and air conditioning diagram, equipment schedule * Landscape and Irrigation plans - Paper submittals shall include four (4) complete sets detached from building plans. Refer to the citys plan check submittal requirements and checklists for a complete list.

4. Paper plan submittals shall include two (2) sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations and soils reports.

Architects/Engineers stamp and wet signature is required prior to submittal of plan check.

5. Separate permits are required for all new site fences and walls.

6. An approved Construction Waste Management Plan and Recycling Worksheets shall be kept on site and maintained by the applicant, and made available for inspection by City representatives at all times in accordance with the California Green Building Standards Code. Documentation which demonstrates compliance with the minimum recycling of waste materials required by CAL Green shall be provided to the building inspector prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Final Approval.

7. All fees, including but not limited to, occupancy fees, property development tax, and school fees must be paid in full prior to issuance of building permits. Any development impact fees that apply to the project must be paid in full prior to NIC or CofO issuance.

Project Number: CUPM2024-0002
Applied: 4/30/2024 Approved: 5/28/2025
Closed: Expired: 5/28/2027
Status: APPROVED
Parent Project:

Cell Site Modification to CUP92-02
Site Address: 1660 LEESON AVE CORONA, CA 92879

VERIZON WIRELESS
15505 SAND CANYON RD BLD C IRVINE,CAIRVINE CA,92618
Description:

Applicant:

CUPM2024-0002 1 of 4 (Continued on next page)
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 2526 of 2543 ends

BUILDING Anthony Hurley

8. Project entitlement approvals shall be obtained prior to plan approval and issuance of Building permits. Final Conditions of Approval shall be made part of set of plans. [Conditions of approval shall be pasted on plans]

9. Grading plans shall be approved and pads certified prior to Building permit issuance.

10. Utilities shall meet the utility authority's service requirements. Applicant shall coordinate the utility locations and design with the respective utility provider.

11. Project shall be designed to conform to the applicable edition of the California Building Standards Code including local amendments, and the Corona Municipal Code.

12. Prior to beginning construction, obtain demolition permit for existing building, foundation, and utilities.

13. The temporary Verizon equipment cabinets, antennas, RRU units & raycap units mounted on the temporary 62' tall monopole shall be removed prior to the final sign off for the new permanent Monopole and equipment.

14. Project site shall be kept clean, secure, safe, and BMPs installed and maintained, and follow all city, state, and county requirements and due standard of care.

FIRE Xente Baker

1. All projects shall comply with the City of Corona Fire Department Site Construction Standard. A copy of which is available at the coronaca.gov. Projects shall have approved all weather access from two (2) directions and fire hydrants providing the required fire flow tested and accepted prior to combustible construction.

2. A Knox Box shall be provided for this business. To apply for a Knox product visit https://www.knoxbox.com/

3. Provide Class A roofing material on all structures per the Corona Municipal Code.

4. A specific address, assigned by the City of Corona, Public Works Department, shall be provided for each building as specified by the fire department address standard which can be obtained at coronaca.gov/fire. Addresses must be illuminated during all hours of darkness.

5. Ensure existing address numerals are 12" in height, placed on the street side of the facility and illuminated during all hours of darkness.

6. Fire extinguishers shall be provided prior to occupancy. Fire extinguishers shall bear a California State Fire Marshal's service tag; it shall be appropriately rated for the hazard; it shall be mounted so that the top of the extinguisher is no higher than five (5) feet above floor level; and shall be located such that the travel distance to an extinguisher does not exceed seventy-five (75) feet.

7. Storage, Use and Dispensing of hazardous materials shall be in accordance with the California Building and Fire Code.

8. Plans make reference to LPG containers being stored in a metal cage. Please identify the aggregate amount of LPG that will either handled, stored or used on site. You shall also be required to update your CERS inventory to reflect the LPG.

9. The existing NFPA 704 Placard shall be updated/revised to reflect the hazard rating associated with LPG.

PLANNING

1. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City of Corona and its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries of any kind, in law or equity, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any attack against or attempt to challenge, set aside, void or annul any approval, decision or other action of the City of Corona, whether such approval, decision or other action was by its City Council, Planning and Housing Commission or other board, director, official, officer, employee, volunteer or agent. To the extent that Government Code Section 66474.9 applies, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding made known to the City to which Government Code Section 66474.9 applies and the City will fully cooperate in the defense. The Applicant's obligations hereunder shall include, without limitation, the payment of any and all damages, consultant and expert fees, and attorney's fees and other related costs and expenses. The City shall have the right to retain such legal counsel as the City deems necessary and appropriate.

CUPM2024-0002 2 of 4 (Continued on next page)
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 2527 of 2543 ends

PLANNING

2. Nothing herein shall be construed to require City to defend any attack against or attempt to challenge, set aside, void or annul any such City approval, decision or other action. If at any time Applicant chooses not to defend (or continue to defend) any attack against or attempt to challenge, set aside, void or annul any such City approval, decision or other action, the City may choose, in its sole discretion, to defend or not defend any such action. In the event that the City decides not to defend or continue the defense, Applicant shall be obligated to reimburse City for any and all costs, fees, penalties or damages associated with dismissing the action or proceeding. If at any time both the Applicant and the City choose not to defend (or continue to defend) any action noted herein, all subject City approvals, decisions or other actions shall be null and void. The Applicant shall be required to enter into any reimbursement agreement deemed necessary by the City to effectuate the terms of this condition.

3. This permit hereby allowed is conditional upon the privileges being utilized by the securing of the first permit thereof, or compliance with all conditions on the granting of this conditional use permit within two (2) years after the effective date thereof, and if they are not utilized, or construction work is not begun within said time and carried on diligently to completion, this authorization shall become void, and any privilege or permit granted shall be deemed to have lapsed.

4. The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Corona Municipal Code (CMC) and ordinances and the Location, Development And Design Guidelines And Standards For Telecommunications Facilities ("Wireless Telecommunications Design Guidelines"), including the payment of all required fees.

5. The applicant shall comply with any additional permit or license issued by a local, state, or federal agency which has jurisdiction over the wireless telecommunication facility.

6. The applicant shall maintain compliance at all times with all federal, state and local statutes, rules, regulations, orders and standards ("Laws") applicable to the applicant, the property located at 1660 Leeson Lane, the wireless telecommunication facility or any use or activities in connection with the use authorized by CUPM2024-0002, including, without limitation, any Laws applicable to human exposure to RF emissions and any Laws of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (RCALUC), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).

7. The wireless telecommunication facility shall be maintained in a manner consistent with the original intent and approval of CUPM2024-0002.

8. Any modifications or expansion to this wireless telecommunications facility shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.

9. If the wireless telecommunications facility becomes non-operational or is discontinued, the applicant shall remove the wireless telecommunication facility, equipment from the project site, and returned to its original condition.

10. Development of the wireless communications facility shall be in substantial conformance with all plans and exhibits included with the Planning and Housing Commission staff report for CUPM2024-0002.

11. The antennas, antenna arrays, RRUs, Raycap units, and all other equipment mounted onto the tower shall be painted green to match the mono-eucalyptus foliage. Additionally, the antennas shall be covered by “socks” that are textured to mimic the eucalyptus foliage, and the tree bark shall have the same texture and color as the existing live eucalyptus trees that are to the east the project site. The applicant shall provide the Planning Division a sample tree leaf and bark palette for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.

12. The applicant shall provide after-hours contact information on the equipment cabinets.

13. The project approved under CUPM2024-0002 shall comply with the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) project conditions found in Section 6.1.4 and Best Management Practices (BMP) found in Appendix C of the JPR Findings and Maps prepared for the project (JPR 25-02-12-01).

14. The temporary tower shall be removed from the property upon the expiration of CUPM2024-0002 or upon receiving a Building final for the permanent tower, whichever comes first. [AMENDED BY THE PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSION ON MAY 28, 2025]

15. The proposed telecommunications facility shall be built to accommodate future colocations from other carriers. During Building Plan Check the applicant is to submit a copy of the appropriate portions of the tentative lease agreement indicating that no exclusive agreements have been made to prevent future carriers to locate on the same site or facility, as well as submit a design plan, which does not preclude potential additional users.

CUPM2024-0002 3 of 4 (Continued on next page)
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 2528 of 2543 ends

PUBLIC WORKS Michael Kallenbaugh

1. The Public Works, Planning and Development, and Utilities Department comments for the subject application and shall be completed at no cost to any government agency. All questions regarding the intent of the comments shall be referred to the Planning and Development Department, Development Services Division. Should a conflict arise between City of Corona standards and design criteria and any other standards and design criteria, City of Corona standards and design criteria shall prevail.

2. The developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and all applicable City ordinances and resolutions.

3. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that the proposed project will not unreasonably interfere with the use of any easement holder of the property.

4. The submitted site plan shall correctly show all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses. Any omission or misrepresentation of these documents may require said site plan to be resubmitted for further consideration.

5. All existing and new utilities adjacent to and on-site shall be placed underground in accordance with City of Corona ordinances.

6. The developer shall monitor, supervise and control all construction and construction related activities to prevent them from causing a public nuisance including, but not limited to, insuring strict adherence to the following: a) Removal of dirt, debris or other construction material deposited on any public street no later than the end of each working day. (b) Construction operations, including building related activities and deliveries, shall be restricted to Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., excluding holidays, and from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays, in accordance with City Municipal Code 15.04.060, unless otherwise extended or shortened by the City Engineer or Building Official. (c) The construction site shall accommodate the parking of all motor vehicles used by persons working at or providing deliveries to the site. Violation of any condition or restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions shall subject the owner, applicant, developer or contractor(s) to remedies as noted in the City Municipal Code. In addition, the City Engineer or Building Official may suspend all construction related activities for violation of any condition, restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions until such time as it has been determined that all operations and activities are in conformance with these conditions.

7. All the grading design criteria shall be per City of Corona standards, Corona Municipal Code Title 15 Chapter 15.36 and City Council Ordinance Number 2568, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

8. All City of Corona NPDES permit requirements for NPDES and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) shall be met per Corona Municipal Code Title 13 Chapter 13.27 and City Council Ordinance Numbers 2291 and 2828 unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

9. All the drainage design criteria shall be per City of Corona standards and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District standards unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 4 of 4
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 2529 of 2543 ends

Page 1 ends

VZW TEMESCARONA

PROJECT NARRATIVE

PROPOSED MODIFICATION
The existing telecommunication facility consists of a 62’ high wood pole with antennas, RRU’s, mounting brackets and cables along with the prefabricated equipment building.

The facility is located at the southeast corner of the property and is surrounded by a storage area for the primary uses of the property owner (Mission Rubber Company).

This Conditional Use Permit (CUP) proposal includes removing the existing facility and replacing it with a new 67’ tri-trunk MonoEucalyptus with antenna, RRU’s, mounting brackets, cables, and a ground mounted equipment enclosure in generally the same rear corner of the property. The concrete block enclosure includes three (3) equipment cabinets, utility connections for power and fiber, along with a new 30kW generator with 221-gallon diesel fuel tank.

Verizon Wireless (VZW) currently provides wireless service at this existing telecommunications facility. The wood pole and equipment shelter are currently owned by American Tower Company (ATC). The property owner wanted the current facility to be shifted on the property and ATC will be removing their equipment, which leaves VZW to build a new permanent facility.

In order to construct the permanent facility in the same general location as the existing site, a temporary site is needed, to keep VZW’s service active and not interrupted during construction of the new MonoEucalyptus and equipment enclosure. The temporary site consists of a steel pole with equipment cabinets on a concrete block foundation. While VZW will be asking for 12 months for the temporary use permit, it will only need to be up and on-air while permitting and then construction is completed.

The proposed project complies with Corona’s Municipal Code guidelines, Section

17.65.050 (3) as the temporary facility is intended to provide telecommunications service for a one-time period, not to exceed 365 days, and can be conditioned with start and removal dates.

SITE DESIGN
A tri-trunk MonoEucalyptus was selected to adequately screen the antennas and radios due to its rounded and natural shape. Additional screening measures include camouflaging of the antennas with 3M film and antenna socks, to further blend the equipment within the branches. While there are no existing trees on this industrial zoned lot, there are live mature eucalyptus trees just to the east of the property along South Temescal Street, which will allow it to blend into the existing built community.

The new ground equipment will be within a new 8’ high block wall enclosure to screen any off-site views.
10/23/2024

Page 2530 of 2543 ends

Page 2 ends

This modification does not constitute a substantial change to the physical dimensions of the previously permitted, existing telecommunication facility. Key components are summarized below:
• The ground equipment will be in the same general area and size, within a concrete block enclosure that is lower in height, eight (8) feet instead of the 12- foot equipment building.
• The antenna structure is changing from a 62-foot wood pole to a 67-foot faux MonoBroadleaf, in order to comply with the City’s current Zoning Ordinance. The additional five (5) feet in height is to accommodate the faux branching at the top of the pole, which conceals the antennas and radios. This allows the antenna centerline to stay consistent between the existing and proposed antenna structure.

SITE SELECTION
The location for the existing telecommunication facility was chosen because of the coverage afforded by its strategic location and lack of nearby obstructions to allow a signal to reach the geographical service area. It is needed for both coverage and capacity. The goal is to continue providing wireless coverage along 6th Avenue, Magnolia, Sampson Avenue, All American Way and the surrounding industrial and residential properties in the vicinity. Without this site, there is little to no wireless coverage in the area. This site would also relieve some capacity off the adjacent sites, allowing them to work more optimally.

LOCATION GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
The project complies with the guidelines and standards for telecommunication facilities as outlined in the City’s Code as noted below:

A. The property is zoned M-3 (heavy industrial) and is in a preferred location for a telecommunication facility.

B. This existing facility is not in a residential zone.

C. Collocation is not available in this area and the buildings are too low to meet Verizon’s coverage objectives. Existing visual buffers include industrials building surrounding the site and mature trees to the east.

D. Verizon is utilizing a faux MonoEucalyptus that has been designed to conceal the antennas and radios from view, which is a state-of-the-art technology.

E. While collocation is not available, the MonoEucalyptus is being designed for collocation, should another carrier find it suitable in the future. A future carrier would need to secure ground space from the underlying property owner.

F. This is an existing site for Verizon and staff determined a coverage map was not needed with this application.

DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
This application meetings the following development and design guidelines set forth by the City:

Page 2531 of 2543 ends

Page 3 ends

A. Existing visual buffers include industrial buildings surrounding the site and mature trees to the east. Utilizing a faux MonoEucalyptus helps to screen the facility from view.

B. The facility meets the applicable zoning setbacks of the underlying zone.

C. Public art is not feasible in this facility as it is setback from public view within the rear of an industrially zoned property.

D. The height of the support structure (MonoEucalyptus) is the minimum necessary to continue providing the required coverage for the community.

E. The facility will comply with all required FAA lighting, if needed.

F. The MonoEucalyptus is coated and painted in natural colors to mimic adjacent trees in the area.

G. Utilities are being placed underground, where feasible.

H. A concrete block wall fence is being used for the equipment enclosure.

I. The facility is being designed to be compliant with all City building, electrical and noise codes, standards, etc.

J. The facility will comply with all FCC licensing requirements, operating at the allotted radio bandwidths.

Page 2532 of 2543 ends

Notice of Exemption FORM “A”

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
Name: City of Corona, Planning &
Development Department
Address: 400 S. Vicentia Ave., Suite
120, Corona, CA 92882
TO:
☐ Office of Planning and Research
P. O. Box 3044, Room 113
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
FROM:
(Public
Agency)
Telephone: 951-736-2434
☒ Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
or
County Clerk (Include County name)
Address: 2724 Gateway Dr. Riverside, CA
92507

1. Project Title: Conditional Use Permit Modification – CUPM2024-0002

2. Project Applicant: Kerrigan Diehl from Plancom Inc., representing Verizon Wireless

3. Project Location – Identify street address and cross streets or attach a map showing project site
(preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 1/2’ topographical map
identified by quadrangle name):
1660 Leeson Lane (APN 107-320-015)

4. (a) Project Location – City: Corona (b) Project Location – County: Riverside

5. Description of nature, purpose, and beneficiaries of Project:

Application to modify Conditional Use Permit 92-02
to replace an existing 62-foot-tall wireless
telecommunication tower with a new 67-foot-tall
wireless telecommunications tower designed as a
mono-eucalyptus tree.

6. Name of Public Agency approving project: City of Corona

7. Name of Person or Agency undertaking the project,
including any person undertaking an activity that
receives financial assistance from the Public Agency
as part of the activity or the person receiving a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement of use from the Public Agency as part of the activity:

Kerrigan Diehl from Plancom Inc., representing
Verizon Wireless

8. Exempt status: (check one)
(a) ☐ Ministerial project. (Pub. Resources Code § 21080(b)(1); State CEQA Guidelines § 15268)
(b) ☐ Not a project.

Page 2533 of 2543 ends

Notice of Exemption FORM “A”
(c) ☐ Emergency Project. (Pub. Resources Code § 21080(b)(4); State CEQA Guidelines § 15269(b),(c))
(d) ☒ Categorical Exemption.

State type and section number:

Per Section 15302 of the State Guidelines for
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and Section 3.31 of the City’s Local CEQA
Guidelines, a Notice of Exemption has been prepared for the project because the project qualifies as a Class 2
(Replacement or Reconstruction) categorical exemption.
(e) ☐ Declared Emergency. (Pub. Resources Code § 21080(b)(3); State CEQA Guidelines § 15269(a))
(f) ☐ Statutory Exemption.

State Code section number:
(g) ☐ Other. Explanation:

9. Reason why project was exempt: Application to modify Conditional Use Permit 92-02 to replace an existing 62-foot-high wireless
telecommunication tower with a new 67-foot-high
wireless telecommunications tower designed as a
mono-eucalyptus tree.

10. Lead Agency Contact Person:

Telephone: Brendan Dalde, Associate Planner
(951) 739-4918

11. If filed by applicant: Attach Preliminary Exemption Assessment (Form “A”) before filing.

12. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes ☒ No ☐

13. Was a public hearing held by the Lead Agency to consider the exemption? Yes ☒ No ☐ If yes, the date of the public hearing was: May 28, 2025 ________________________________
Signature Date: Click to enter date
__________________________________
Name Title: Click to enter title
☐ Signed by Lead Agency ☐ Signed by Applicant
Date Received for Filing: Click to enter date
(Clerk Stamp Here)
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code.

Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code.

Page 2534 of 2543 ends

Corona City CouncilJune 18, 2025

Corona City Council
June 18, 2025