DATE: 07/06/2026
TO: Honorable Chair and Commissioners
FROM: Planning and Development Department
2026-256
APPLICATION REQUEST:
CUP2025-0002: Conditional Use Permit to establish a wireless telecommunications facility designed as an 81-foot-high ballfield light pole with ground-mounted equipment within Citrus Community Park, located at 1250 Santana Way (Applicant: Rinn Ngeth for Nuwave International Industries, 1875 Coronado Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755) RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the Planning and Housing Commission adopt Resolution No. 2690, finding the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines, and granting CUP2025-0002 based on the findings contained in the staff report and conditions of approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Nuwave International Industries (“Applicant”), on behalf of Verizon Wireless, is requesting that the Planning and Housing Commission review and consider approval of a wireless telecommunications facility proposed at Citrus Community Park, located at 1250 Santana Way. The proposed facility is designed as a ballfield light pole with a height of 81 feet. The proposed ballfield light pole (“tower”) will replace an existing ballfield light pole (same 81- foot height) in approximately the same location within an open field of the Park. Antennas and associated equipment would be mounted onto the tower. The project also includes the installation of supporting ground-mounted mechanical equipment fully enclosed by a block wall.
BACKGROUND
Citrus Community Park measures approximately 19.83 acres in area and is bounded by Santana Way to the west, Taber Street to the north, Rimpau Avenue to the east, residential properties to the south, and an elementary school to the southwest. Residential uses surround the park on all sides. The City of Corona is the owner of Citrus Community Park, with the Community Services Department responsible for its operations and oversight.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Conditional Use Permit 2025-0002 (CUP2025-0002) is a request by the Applicant to replace an existing 81-foot-tall ballfield light pole with a new ballfield light pole (“tower”) of the same height. The tower would be located six feet from the original structure’s location. Nine antennas and nine radio remote units (RRUs) are proposed to be mounted onto the tower at approximately 57 feet to 73 feet above ground level. The tower plans are attached as Exhibit
3. The tower is proposed to be constructed at the approximate center of Citrus Community Park. The proposed location meets the minimum setback requirements prescribed by the Corona Vista Specific Plan, which are summarized in Table 1 below.
Table 1 – Open Space & Recreation Zone Development Standards Standard Required Proposed Compliance
Minimum setback
from a street
20 feet 512 feet from Taber Street Yes
Minimum setback
from residential
parcels
50 feet More than 300 feet from Santana
Way and Rimpau Avenue
Yes
Maximum Height 30 feet 80 feet and 7 inches Permissible with approval of a CUP
Associated with the tower are supporting ground-mounted mechanical equipment which will be placed within an enclosed eight-foot-high concrete block wall located within the park, approximately 146 feet north of the tower. The equipment includes an emergency generator, battery, and cabinets. Creeping vines are proposed to be placed around the perimeter of the enclosure to soften its appearance.
The tower will also serve as a functional ballfield light pole and includes seven luminaires intended to provide illumination for the adjacent soccer field. To further minimize the tower’s visual impact, a condition of approval has been imposed requiring that the antennas and all associated equipment be painted to match the color and finish of the pole, thereby enhancing the stealth design and reducing the visibility of the telecommunications components.
Access to the site is obtained via Santana Way. A service technician for Verizon is anticipated to visit the site periodically throughout the year for routine maintenance and will utilize one to two parking spaces within the parking lot of the park. Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to impact the surrounding roadways in terms of traffic.
Parks and Recreation Commission
The applicant’s proposal was reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission at its meeting on May 12, 2026. The Commission made a recommendation for a metal cage to be installed atop the equipment enclosure to secure the equipment. The Applicant has agreed to make the improvement and a condition of approval has been included within Exhibit 4.
Alternative Site Analysis
Coverage for current Verizon customers located south of California Avenue between Ontario Avenue and Foothill Parkway is mostly poor, with pockets of “no coverage” near Foothill Parkway (Exhibit 6). Prior to selecting Citrus Community Park, the Applicant evaluated other potential sites in the vicinity of the target service area for collocation opportunity.
The Applicant submitted a Collocation Feasibility Letter (Exhibit 5) which shows the location of Verizon’s search ring area and identifies the most optimal location for a wireless facility to provide adequate signal strength, coverage, and capacity to improve service in the area. The search ring encompasses all of Citrus Community Park and the surrounding residential properties. Exhibit 5 also shows the location of nearby wireless facilities, with the closest facility located in a shopping center north of the project property. Because the existing wireless facilities are located outside of Verizon’s target service area, the Applicant determined that collocation on any of the existing facilities are not suitable. Placing a wireless telecommunications facility on a residential property developed with a residential dwelling is also not an option, as this is prohibited by the City. As the surrounding area is predominantly residential, the Applicant determined that Citrus Community Park is the viable location to place the proposed facility in order to provide significant improvement in cellular coverage and to address the existing coverage gap.
Regulations Governing Telecommunications Facilities
Wireless telecommunications facilities are regulated by federal, state, and local laws. In California, local agencies such as Corona have the authority to regulate the location, height, design, and aesthetic impacts of wireless facilities, subject to limitations established under federal law, including the Telecommunications Act of 1996. These limitations include Section 704 of the Act, which is codified in Title 47 Section 332(c)(7)(B)(iv) of the United States Code, which limits the City’s ability to regulate wireless facilities based on concerns about the health effects of Radio Frequency (RF) emissions to humans. If the proposed facility complies with the Federal Communications Commission’s standards for RF emissions under Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the City cannot deny or condition the project based on concerns related to environmental or health effects from RF emissions.
According to the project’s RF Emission Compliance Report (Exhibit 8), the proposed wireless telecommunications facility will be in compliance with RF Exposure Limits stated in Title 47 of the CFR and will not expose members of the general public to hazardous levels of RF energy at ground level or adjacent buildings. Per the report, RF signage will be placed on the pole to alert authorized personnel who may be conducting work or maintenance on the antenna.
PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS
A 10-day public notice was mailed to all property owners within a 500-foot radius of the project site, as well as advertised in the Sentinel Weekly News and posted at the project site.
As of the preparation of this report, staff has received one item of correspondence from a resident, expressing concern regarding the operation and location of the proposed tower.
The correspondence is attached as Exhibit 9.
STAFF ANALYSIS
The proposed tower will serve as both a wireless telecommunications facility and ballfield light pole to illuminate the park. The facility’s design is consistent with the park’s environment, which mimics other ballfield light poles in the Park. All tower-mounted equipment is required to be painted to match the color of the light pole to enhance the stealth design and reduce the visibility of the antenna components. As such, the project complies with the City’s adopted Location, Development, and Design Guidelines and Standards for Telecommunications Facilities, which require wireless telecommunications facilities to be designed as indistinguishable from their surrounding environment.
The wireless facility meets the applicable development standards including the minimum setback requirements prescribed by the Corona Vista Specific Plan. The facility is also subject to all applicable standards imposed by federal law, including RF emissions limits.
The project is not anticipated to impact the surrounding roadways in terms of traffic.
Therefore, staff recommends approval of CUP2025-0002, subject to the findings of approval outlined below and the recommended conditions of approval attached as Exhibit 4.
FINDINGS OF APPROVAL FOR CUP2025-0002
1. A preliminary exemption assessment has been conducted by the City of Corona in accordance with Section 15303 of the State Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 3.38 of the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, and determined that the project meets criteria for a Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) categorical exemption as it involves the installation of new wireless telecommunications equipment and associated ground equipment within a limited area. The project represents a small utility installation and does not result in a significant expansion of the existing use of the site. Moreover, none of the six Exceptions to Exemptions cited in Section 15300.2 are applicable to the proposed project.
2. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110(a) of the CMC, the proposed use will not be detrimental to public health, safety, convenience and general welfare and will be in harmony with the various elements and objectives in the City’s General Plan for the following reason:
a. The proposal will not be detrimental to public health, safety, convenience, and general welfare because any radio frequency emissions from such installation are governed by limits placed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for human exposure. The proposed telecommunications facility is also required to adhere to FCC regulations, and the applicant shall obtain all required permits from local and federal agencies prior to construction.
3. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110(b) of the CMC, the proposed use is not detrimental to other existing and permitted uses in the general area of the project site, and it relates properly to the surrounding roadways for the following reasons:
a. The proposed wireless telecommunications facility is in compliance with the development standards of the Open Space and Recreation zone of the Corona Vista Specific Plan and the City’s Location, Development, and Design Guidelines and Standards for Telecommunications Facilities. The facility complies with the setback requirements of the underlying zone and has been designed to minimize visual impacts while blending (to the greatest extent feasible) with the surrounding environment.
b. CUP2025-0002 will not impact the existing circulation system because a service technician will visit the site periodically throughout the year for routine maintenance and will utilize a parking space within the parking lot and sufficient parking is provided at the project site to accommodate this activity.
Therefore, the proposed use will not impact the level of service on the surrounding streets.
4. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110(c) of the CMC, reasonable conditions of approval have been imposed on the proposed use to protect public health, safety, and welfare in accordance with the intent and purpose of the City’s zoning regulations for the following reason:
a. Conditions of approval have been levied to protect public health, safety, and welfare and in accordance with the intent and purpose of the Open Space and Recreation zone of the Corona Vista Specific Plan and Chapter 17.65 (Telecommunications Facilities) of the Corona Municipal Code.
5. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110(d) of the CMC, the exercise of the proposed use adheres to all property development standards of the zone in which said use is conditionally permitted for the following reasons:
a. The location of the telecommunications facility on the project site meets all building setbacks as required by the Open Space and Recreation zone of the Corona Vista Specific Plan.
b. The 81-foot-tall telecommunications facility is consistent with the applicable development standards of the Open Space and Recreation zone of the Corona Vista Specific Plan and the requirements of Title 17 because CMC Sections
17.65.060(a) and 17.92.030 allow the height of the telecommunications facility to exceed the maximum height prescribed by the property’s underlying zone with approval of a conditional use permit.
c. The appearance of the telecommunications facility as a ballfield light pole meets the requirements of the design guidelines and standards adopted pursuant to CMC Section 17.65.090 as it would serve to make the facility as indistinguishable from the surrounding environment and the equipment affiliated with the telecommunications facility will be screened by an approximate eight-foot-tall block wall enclosure.
PREPARED BY: EDUARDO GALDAMEZ, AICP, ASSISTANT PLANNER
REVIEWED BY: EVAN LANGAN, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
REVIEWED BY: SANDRA VANIAN, PLANNING MANAGER
SUBMITTED BY: DANNY CASTRO, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Exhibits:
1. Resolution No. 2690
2. Locational and Zoning Map
3. Project Plans
4. Conditions of Approval
5. Collocation Feasibility Letter, dated February 9, 2026
6. Coverage (Propagation) Maps
7. Photosimulations of Proposed Facility
8. Radio Frequency Report
9. Public Correspondence
10. Environmental Documentation
RESOLUTION NO. 2690
APPLICATION NUMBER: CUP2025-0002
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND HOUSING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CORONA,
CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A WIRELESS
TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY DESIGNED AS AN
81-FOOT-HIGH BALLFIELD LIGHT POLE WITH
GROUND-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT WITHIN CITRUS
COMMUNITY PARK, LOCATED AT 1250 SANTANA WAY
(APPLICANT: RINN NGETH FOR NUWAVE
INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES).
WHEREAS, the application to the City of Corona, California, for a Conditional Use Permit under the provisions of Chapter 17.92 in the Corona Municipal Code, has been duly submitted to said City's Planning and Housing Commission to establish a wireless telecommunications facility designed as an 81-foot-high ballfield light pole with groundmounted equipment within Citrus Community Park; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Housing Commission held a noticed public hearing for CUP2025-0002 (“Project”) on July 6, 2026, as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Housing Commission finds that this Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines and Section 3.38 of the City of Corona Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA because there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, after close of said hearing, the Commission by formal action, found that all the conditions necessary to granting Conditional Use Permit as set forth in Corona Municipal Code Section 17.92.110 do exist in reference to CUP2025-0002 based on the evidence presented to the Commission during said hearing; and
RESOLUTION NO. 2690
APPLICATION NO. CUP2025-0002
PAGE | 2
WHEREAS, the Planning and Housing Commission based its recommendation to approve CUP2025-0002 subject to certain conditions of approval and the findings set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. CEQA Findings. As the decision-making body for this CUP2025- 0002, the Planning and Housing Commission has determined that this Project does not require further environmental assessment because the Project qualifies as an exemption under CEQA per Section 15303 of the State Guidelines and Section 3.38 of the City of Corona adopted Local Guidelines for implementing CEQA. There is no evidence presented to the city that the Project will have any significant effects on the environment.
SECTION 2. Conditional Use Permit Findings. Pursuant to Corona Municipal Code (“CMC”) Section 17.92.110 and based on the entire record before the Planning and Housing Commission, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, the Commission hereby makes and adopts the following findings:
1. A preliminary exemption assessment has been conducted by the City of Corona in accordance with Section 15303 of the State Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 3.38 of the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, and determined that the project meets criteria for a Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) categorical exemption as it involves the installation of new wireless telecommunications equipment and associated ground equipment within a limited area. The project represents a small utility installation and does not result in a significant expansion of the existing use of the site. Moreover, none of the six Exceptions to Exemptions cited in Section 15300.2 are applicable to the proposed project.
2. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110(a) of the CMC, the proposed use will not be detrimental to public health, safety, convenience and general welfare and will be in harmony with the various elements and objectives in the City’s General Plan for the following reason:
a. The proposal will not be detrimental to public health, safety, convenience, and general welfare because any radio frequency emissions from such installation are governed by limits placed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for human exposure. The proposed telecommunications facility is also required to adhere to FCC regulations, and the applicant shall obtain all required permits from local and federal agencies prior to construction.
3. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110(b) of the CMC, the proposed use is not detrimental to other existing and permitted uses in the general area of the project site, and it relates properly to the surrounding roadways for the following reasons:
RESOLUTION NO. 2690
APPLICATION NO. CUP2025-0002
PAGE | 3
a. The proposed wireless telecommunications facility is in compliance with the development standards of the Open Space and Recreation zone of the Corona Vista Specific Plan and the City’s Location, Development, and Design Guidelines and Standards for Telecommunications Facilities. The facility complies with the setback requirements of the underlying zone and has been designed to minimize visual impacts while blending (to the greatest extent feasible) with the surrounding environment.
b. CUP2025-0002 will not impact the existing circulation system because a service technician will visit the site periodically throughout the year for routine maintenance and will utilize a parking space within the parking lot and sufficient parking is provided at the project site to accommodate this activity. Therefore, the proposed use will not impact the level of service on the surrounding streets.
4. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110(c) of the CMC, reasonable conditions of approval have been imposed on the proposed use to protect public health, safety, and welfare in accordance with the intent and purpose of the City’s zoning regulations for the following reason:
a. Conditions of approval have been levied to protect public health, safety, and welfare and in accordance with the intent and purpose of the Open Space and Recreation zone of the Corona Vista Specific Plan and Chapter 17.65 (Telecommunications Facilities) of the Corona Municipal Code.
5. Pursuant to Section 17.92.110(d) of the CMC, the exercise of the proposed use adheres to all property development standards of the zone in which said use is conditionally permitted for the following reasons:
a. The location of the telecommunications facility on the project site meets all building setbacks as required by the Open Space and Recreation zone of the Corona Vista Specific Plan.
b. The 81-foot-tall telecommunications facility is consistent with the applicable development standards of the Open Space and Recreation zone of the Corona Vista Specific Plan and the requirements of Title 17 because CMC Sections
17.65.060(a) and 17.92.030 allow the height of the telecommunications facility to exceed the maximum height prescribed by the property’s underlying zone with approval of a conditional use permit.
c. The appearance of the telecommunications facility as a ballfield light pole meets the requirements of the design guidelines and standards adopted pursuant to CMC Section 17.65.090 as it would serve to make the facility as indistinguishable from the surrounding environment and the equipment affiliated with the RESOLUTION NO. 2690
APPLICATION NO. CUP2025-0002
PAGE | 4
telecommunications facility will be screened by an approximate eight-foot-tall block wall enclosure.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. CUP2025-0002 will not become effective until the City Council either takes no action on the report or otherwise makes a decision after a City Council initiated review.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered to the City Clerk of said City and a copy thereof be sent to the applicant therefore at the address of said applicant as set forth in the application for said Conditional Use Permit.
LOCATIONAL & ZONING MAP
CUP2025-0002
SWC Taber and Santana
APN: 120-370-017
ZONING LEGEND:
P (Open Space and Recreation in Corona
Vista Specific Plan)
LM (Low Medium in Density Corona Vista
Specific Plan)
M (Medium Density in Corona Vista Specific
Plan)
S (Elementary School in Corona Vista
Specific Plan)
LM
P
M
S
LM
LM
M
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
T1
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
TITLE SHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY INFORMATION:
SHEET DESCRIPTION REV
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
APPLICANT/LESSEE
PROPERTY OWNER:
PROJECT SUMMARY
CODE COMPLIANCE
VICINITY MAP GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
Call before you dig.
Know what'sbelow.
R
VERIZON WIRELESS SIGNATURE BLOCK
PROJECT TEAM
ZONING DRAWINGS
1250 SANTANA WAY
OVERALL HEIGHT 80'-7" CORONA, CA 92881
DRIVING DIRECTIONS
CIVIL ENGINEER:
ENGINEERING:
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
PLANNING:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
T2
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
GENERAL NOTES AND SYMBOLS
X
ABBREVIATIONS
LEGEND DSRD NOTES
PROJECT GENERAL NOTES
PROJECT GENERAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
T3
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
1-A CERTIFICATE
0 LJ ISSUE STATUS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY VICINITY MAP PROPRIETARY INFORMATION LS-1 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: (NAVD 1988) FLOOD ZONE APN
CHASE DRIVE
(RELO)
24 RECODO, IRVINE, CA 92620 714.624.9027
SI
5&
R I M P A U A V E 11/24/25
℄
ɓ
ɓ
ɓ
ɓ
ɓ RECORD OWNER TITLE REPORT
T A B E R R O A D
(
P
U
B
L I C
R
O
A
D
)
S
A
N
T
A
N
A
W
A
Y
℄
℄
1 12/05/25 LJ LEGAL DESCRIPTION
”
’
’ ”
’ ”
“ ”
“ ”
’ ”
’ ”
’ ”
’ ”
’ ”
’ ”
’ ”
’ ”
’ ”
2 12/17/25 LJ SCHEDULE B (EXCEPTIONS)
0 LJ ISSUE STATUS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROPRIETARY INFORMATION LS-2 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED
CHASE DRIVE
(RELO)
24 RECODO, IRVINE, CA 92620 714.624.9027 11/24/25
S A N T A N A W A Y ℄ LEGEND MONUMENTS COORDINATES 1 12/05/25 LJ 2 12/17/25 LJ
STOP STOP T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E
T&E E E E E HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID HYBRID W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
A0
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN 0 1
SCALE:
40' 80' RIMPAU AVE
ZONING: P - (OPEN SPACE
AND RECREATION
APN: 120-370-017 TAFT LN
JEFFERSON CIR
JOHNSON LN SANTANA WAY
ANDREW LN
TABER ST
GLICKAMN CT
T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E
T&E T&E T&E T&E
T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
HYBRID
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
A1
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1
SCALE:
0 4' 8' 12'
ZONING: P - (OPEN SPACE
AND RECREATION
APN: 120-370-017
T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E
T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E HYBRID HYBRID
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
A2
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
EQUIPMENT PLAN
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PLAN 1' 1
SCALE:
0 2'
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
A3
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
ANTENNA LAYOUT, ANTENNA &
RRU SCHEDULE
PROPOSED ANTENNA LAYOUT 1' 2
SCALE:
0 PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU SCHEDULE NOT TO SCALE 1 RAD CENTER @ 71'-0" RAD CENTER @ 66'-0" RAD CENTER @ 59'-0"
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
A4
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
ELEVATIONS
EXISTING SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 2 1
SCALE:
0 2' 4' 6'
SCALE: PROPOSED SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 0 2' 4' 6'
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
A5
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
ELEVATIONS
2 PROPOSED NORTHEAST ELEVATION 1
SCALE:
0 2' 4' 6'
SCALE: EXISTING NORTHEAST ELEVATION 0 2' 4' 6'
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
A6
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
ELEVATIONS
EXISTING NORTHWEST ELEVATION 2 PROPOSED NORTHWEST ELEVATION 1 SCALE:
0 2' 4' 6'
SCALE:
0 2' 4' 6'
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
A7
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
ELEVATIONS
2 PROPOSED SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 1
SCALE:
0 2' 4' 6'
SCALE: EXISTING SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 0 2' 4' 6'
ISSUE STATUS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
A8
Signal Hill, CA 90755
1875 Coronado Ave
A NUWAVE COMPANY
A Nuwave International Industries Company
EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS
1' 2
SCALE: PROPOSED SOUTHEAST EQUIPMENT ELEVATION 0
1' 1
SCALE: PROPOSED NORTHEAST EQUIPMENT ELEVATION 0
on behalf of
February 9, 2026
City of Corona – Planning & Development Department
Project Name: Verizon NSB: Chase Drive
Project Number: CUP2025-002
Site Address: 1250 Santana Way (APN: 120-370-017)
Verizon Collocation Feasibility Narrative
Dear Planning Staff,
As indicated on the enclosed exhibit, there are no existing wireless facilities, within (or immediately outside/adjacent) the Verizon RF Engineer’s search ring area, that could be collocated upon. The existing wireless facilities are depicted by the red and blue dots. All of the existing wireless facilities are located too far from the coverage gap area (red circle).
Collocating upon those facilities would not provide adequate signal strength, coverage or capacity to the service gap area if collocation were attempted. Collocation on the farremoved existing facilities improve or address the current coverage objectives of this search ring/service area.
In light of the absence of existing wireless facilities to collocate upon, Verizon has proposed to locate a new facility in the City of Corona’s Citrus Community Park. As shown on the antenna location map, the project area lacks nearby, existing wireless infrastructure, and the proposed park light pole location is centrally positioned within the coverage gap area.
Verizon is utilizing existing infrastructure in the park, by removing an existing park light standard, and replacing it with a new Musco light that can accommodate wireless equipment. It is less visually intrusive to remove an existing park light standard and replacing it with a new Musco light for wireless equipment, than installing a new wireless monopole/light standard at a new location in the City park. The deployment of the new Verizon wireless facility will improve coverage to the search ring area, and address the signal and service needs of the surrounding residential uses.
Rinn Ngeth
Site Acquisition, Authorized Agent for Verizon Wireless Phone: 562-673-9924
Email: [email protected]
Chase Drive
Propagation Map
Confidential and proprietary materials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only. Use, disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement.
DECEMBER 11, 2025
Overview Map
2 Confidential and proprietary materials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only. Use, disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement.
Verizon Coverage without CHASE DRIVE
3 Confidential and proprietary materials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only. Use, disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement.
Verizon Coverage with CHASE DRIVE
4 Confidential and proprietary materials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only. Use, disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement.
CHASE DRIVE Coverage Only
5 Confidential and proprietary materials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only. Use, disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement.
7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www.waterfordconsultants.com Compliance Statement
Based on information provided by Verizon Wireless and predictive modeling, the CHASE DRIVE installation proposed by Verizon Wireless will be compliant with Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure Limits of 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b)(3) and 1.1310. RF alerting signage and restricting access to the antenna to authorized personnel that have completed RF safety training is required for Occupational environment compliance. The proposed operation will not expose members of the General Public to hazardous levels of RF energy at ground level or in adjacent buildings.
Certification
I, Tim Alexander, am the reviewer and approver of this
report and am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications
Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) with regard to Human
Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation, specifically in
accordance with FCC’s OET Bulletin 65. I have
reviewed this Radio Frequency Exposure Assessment
report and believe it to be both true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
General Summary
The compliance framework is derived from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Rules and Regulations for preventing human exposure in excess of the applicable Maximum Permissible Exposure (“MPE”) limits. At any location at this site, the power density resulting from each transmitter may be expressed as a percentage of the frequency-specific limits and added to determine if 100% of the exposure limit has been exceeded. The FCC Rules define two tiers of permissible exposure differentiated by the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to exposure. General Population / Uncontrolled exposure limits apply to those situations in which persons may not be aware of the presence of electromagnetic energy, where exposure is not employment-related, or where persons cannot exercise control over their exposure. Occupational / Controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment, have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure, and can exercise control over their exposure. Based on the criteria for these classifications, the FCC General Population limit is considered to be a level that is safe for continuous exposure time. The FCC General Population limit is 5 times more restrictive than the Occupational limits.
Report Preparer: Mohamed Ahmed
Radio Frequency Emissions Compliance Report for Verizon Wireless Site Name: CHASE DRIVE Site Structure Type: Light Pole
Address: 1250 Santana Way Latitude: 33.843936
Corona, CA 92881 Longitude: -117.545094
Report Date:April 24, 2026 Project: NSB
REGIST ERED
PROFESSIO NA L ENGINEE R
E L E
C T R I C A L
No. E18344
S T A T E O F C A L IFOR NIA
T IM
AL
EXANDER
E L E
C T R I C A L
S T A
NIA
Exp, 31 MAR 2028 SIGNED, 27 APR 2026
CHASE DRIVE - MODIFICATION 04.24.2026
7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www.waterfordconsultants.com Table 1: FCC Limits
Frequency
(MHz)
Limits for General Population/ Uncontrolled Exposure Limits for Occupational/ Controlled Exposure Power Density
(mW/cm2)
Averaging Time
(minutes)
Power Density
(mW/cm2)
Averaging Time
(minutes)
30-300 0.2 30 1 6
300-1500 f/1500 30 f/300 6
1500-100,000 1.0 30 5.0 6
f=Frequency (MHz)
In situations where the predicted MPE exceeds the General Population threshold in an accessible area as a result of emissions from multiple transmitters, FCC licensees that contribute greater than 5% of the aggregate MPE share responsibility for mitigation.
Based on the computational guidelines set forth in FCC OET Bulletin 65, Waterford Consultants, LLC has developed software to predict the overall Maximum Permissible Exposure possible at any location given the spatial orientation and operating parameters of multiple RF sources. The power density in the Far Field of an RF source is specified by OET-65 Equation 5 as follows:
𝑆 =
𝐸𝐼𝑅𝑃
4⋅𝜋⋅𝑅2
(mW/cm2)
Where EIRP is the Effective Radiated Power relative to an isotropic antenna and R is the distance between the antenna and point of study. Additionally, consideration is given to the manufacturers’ horizontal and vertical antenna patterns as well as radiation reflection. At any location, the predicted power density in the Far Field is the spatial average of points within a 0 to 6-foot vertical profile that a person would occupy. Near field power density is based on OET-65 Equation 20 stated as 𝑆 = (
180
𝜃𝐵𝑊
) ⋅
100 ⋅ 𝑃𝑖𝑛
𝜋 ⋅ 𝑅 ⋅ ℎ
(mW/cm2)
Where Pin is the power input to the antenna, BW is the horizontal pattern beamwidth and h is the aperture length.
Some antennas employ beamforming technology where RF energy allocated to each customer device is dynamically directed toward their location. In the analysis presented herein, predicted exposure levels are based on all beams at full utilization (i.e. full power) simultaneously focused in any direction. As this condition is unlikely to occur, the actual power density levels at ground and at adjacent structures are expected to be less that the levels reported below. These theoretical results represent maximum-case predictions as all RF emitters are assumed to be operating at maximum duty cycle.
For any area in excess of 100% General Population MPE, access controls with appropriate RF alerting signage must be put in place and maintained to restrict access to authorized personnel. Signage must be posted to be visible upon approach from any direction to provide notification of potential conditions within these areas.
Subject to other site security requirements, occupational personnel should be trained in RF safety and equipped with personal protective equipment (e.g. RF personal monitor) designed for safe work in the vicinity of RF emitters. Controls such as physical barriers to entry imposed by locked doors, hatches and ladders or other access control mechanisms may be supplemented by alarms that alert the individual and notify site management of a breach in access control. Waterford Consultants, LLC recommends that any work activity in these designated areas or in front of any transmitting antennas be coordinated with all wireless tenants.
CHASE DRIVE - MODIFICATION 04.24.2026
7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www.waterfordconsultants.com Analysis
Verizon Wireless proposes the following installation at this location shown in Figure 1:
SCOPE:
• INSTALL (3) NN-65B-HG-R1B ANTENNA
• INSTALL (3) AIR3283 RADIO/ANTENNA
• INSTALL (3) AIR6419 RADIO/ANTENNA
• INSTALL (3) 4490 RADIO
The antennas will be mounted on a Light Pole with centerlines at (71.0’/60.0’/66.0’) above ground level.
Proposed antenna operating parameters are listed in Appendix A. Other appurtenances such as GPS antennas, RRUs and hybrid cable below the antennas are not sources of RF emissions. No other antennas are known to be operating in the vicinity of this site.
CHASE DRIVE - MODIFICATION 04.24.2026
7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www.waterfordconsultants.com Figure 1: Antenna Locations
Power density decreases significantly with distance from any antenna. The antennas to be employed at this site are highly directional by design and the orientation in azimuth and mounting elevation, as documented, serves to reduce the potential to exceed MPE limits at any location other than directly in front of the antennas.
For accessible areas at ground level and incident at adjacent structures, the maximum predicted RF power density level resulting from all operations is depicted in Figure 2. The proposed operations will not expose members of the public to hazardous levels of RF energy at ground level or in adjacent buildings CHASE DRIVE - MODIFICATION 04.24.2026
7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www.waterfordconsultants.com Figure 2.1: Predicted MPE as Percentage of FCC General Population Limits (All transmitters) CHASE DRIVE - MODIFICATION 04.24.2026
7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www.waterfordconsultants.com Figure 2.2: Predicted MPE as Percentage of FCC General Population Limits (Verizon Only) CHASE DRIVE - MODIFICATION 04.24.2026
7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www.waterfordconsultants.com Figure 3 shows predicted MPE levels near the antennas. Waterford Consultants, LLC recommends an RF Safety Plan for the Light Pole and posting RF advisory signage (Warning) signs to be posted on the Light Pole 21’ below the C-Band antennas to be visible upon approach to inform personnel accessing this area of potential hazards when working around antennas. This recommendation is depicted in Figure 4. Any work activity in front of transmitting antennas should be coordinated with Verizon.
Figure 3: Predicted MPE at Antenna Elevation as Percentage of FCC General Population Limits CHASE DRIVE - MODIFICATION 04.24.2026
7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www.waterfordconsultants.com Compliance Requirement Diagram
Recommendations
- Warning signs (x2) on
the front and back of the
Light pole 21ft below the
C-Band antenna.
- RF Safety Plan for the
Light Pole.
Materials
(2) Warning Signs
Proposed Signs/Barriers Existing Signs/Barriers
Figure 4: Mitigation Recommendations
CHASE DRIVE - MODIFICATION 04.24.2026
7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www.waterfordconsultants.com Appendix A: Operating Parameters Considered in this Analysis ID
Sub
ID Carrier
NAME Antenna Model MDT (°) Az (°) Freq Band EDT (°) HBW (°) VBW (°) Paths Transmit
Power
(W)
Total
Power
(W)
Gain
(dBd) ERP (W) Ground z Height
A1 VZW SON_AIR3283 0 130 1900 SON 69 17 32 3.75 120 14.48 3366.51 71 A1 VZW SON_AIR3283 0 130 2100 SON 67 15 32 4.375 140 15.01 4437.41 71 A1 VZW SON_AIR3283 0 130 2100_3 SON 67 15 32 1.875 60 15.01 1901.74 71 A2 VZW NN-65B-HG-R1B 0 130 700 SON 11 25 4 60 213.9 12.74 4019.85 60 A2 VZW NN-65B-HG-R1B 0 130 850 SON 69 11 4 60 213.9 13.06 4327.24 60 A3 VZW SON_AIR6419 0 130 3700 SON 70 9 64 5 320 23.45 70818.96 66 B1 VZW SON_AIR3283 0 240 1900 SON 69 17 32 3.75 120 14.48 3366.51 71 B1 VZW SON_AIR3283 0 240 2100 SON 67 15 32 4.375 140 15.01 4437.41 71 B1 VZW SON_AIR3283 0 240 2100_3 SON 67 15 32 1.875 60 15.01 1901.74 71 B2 VZW NN-65B-HG-R1B 0 240 700 SON 11 25 4 60 213.9 12.74 4019.85 60 B2 VZW NN-65B-HG-R1B 0 240 850 SON 69 11 4 60 213.9 13.06 4327.24 60 B3 VZW SON_AIR6419 0 240 3700 SON 70 9 64 5 320 23.45 70818.96 66 C1 VZW SON_AIR3283 0 350 1900 SON 69 17 32 3.75 120 14.48 3366.51 71 C1 VZW SON_AIR3283 0 350 2100 SON 67 15 32 4.375 140 15.01 4437.41 71 C1 VZW SON_AIR3283 0 350 2100_3 SON 67 15 32 1.875 60 15.01 1901.74 71 C2 VZW NN-65B-HG-R1B 0 350 700 SON 11 25 4 60 213.9 12.74 4019.85 60 C2 VZW NN-65B-HG-R1B 0 350 850 SON 69 11 4 60 213.9 13.06 4327.24 60 C3 VZW SON_AIR6419 0 350 3700 SON 70 9 64 5 320 23.45 70818.96 66 1 Eduardo Galdamez
From: marge carrillo <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2026 4:26 PM
To: Eduardo Galdamez
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Public Hearing July 6th, 2026
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
[You don't oŌen get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at hƩps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdenƟficaƟon ]
[CAUTION] DO NOT CLICK links or aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
With regard to our community meeƟng and the planning of a wireless telecommunicaƟons facility at Citrus Park, I have many concerns including how this planned addiƟon would be accepted with our local families, and health issues of same.
Topics include:
RadiaƟon exposure, radiaƟon increasing every year, insurance companies comparing cell towers to asbestos as a hazard material, fire risks, aestheƟc and visual impacts, and property values decreasing.
I would appreciate the above concerns being addressed with an explanaƟon to the residents of Corona.
With appreciaƟon,
Margaret Carrillo
1245 TaŌ Lane
Corona, CA 92881
Notice of Exemption FORM “A”
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
TO:
☐ Office of Planning and Research
P. O. Box 3044, Room 113
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
FROM:
(Public
Agency)
Name: City of Corona, Planning &
Development Department
Address: 400 S. Vicentia Ave., Suite
120, Corona, CA 92882
Telephone: 951-736-2434
☒ Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
or
County Clerk (Riverside)
Address: 2724 Gateway Dr. Riverside, CA
92507
1. Project Title: CUP2025-0002
2. Project Applicant: Rinn Ngeth, Nuwave International Industries, 1875 Coronado Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755
3. Project Location – Identify Street address and cross streets or attach a map showing project site
(preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 1/2’ topographical map
identified by quadrangle name):
1250 Santana Way, Corona, CA 92881, southwest corner
of Taber Street and Santana Way (APN:120-370-017)
4. (a) Project Location – City: Corona (b) Project Location – County: Riverside
5. Description of nature, purpose, and beneficiaries of Project:
Conditional Use Permit CUP2025-0002 – To establish a
wireless communications facility consisting of antennas mounted on a ballfield light pole and ground-mounted
equipment within Citrus Community Park, located at 1250 Santana Way
6. Name of Public Agency approving project: City of Corona
7. Name of Person or Agency undertaking the project,
including any person undertaking an activity that
receives financial assistance from the Public Agency
as part of the activity or the person receiving a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement of use from the Public Agency as part of the activity:
Rinn Ngeth, Nuwave International Industries, 1875
Coronado Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755
8. Exempt status: (check one)
(a) ☐ Ministerial project. (Pub. Resources Code § 21080(b)(1); State CEQA Guidelines § 15268)
(b) ☐ Not a project.
Notice of Exemption FORM “A”
(c) ☐ Emergency Project. (Pub. Resources Code § 21080(b)(4); State CEQA Guidelines § 15269(b),(c))
(d) ☒ Categorical Exemption.
State type and section number:
Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small
Structures) Categorical Exemption per Section 15303 of
the State Guidelines for Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 3.38 of
the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines.
(e) ☐ Declared Emergency. (Pub. Resources Code § 21080(b)(3); State CEQA Guidelines § 15269(a))
(f) ☐ Statutory Exemption.
State Code section number:
(g) ☐ Other. Explanation:
9. Reason why project was exempt: The project involves the installation of new wireless telecommunications equipment on a replacement ballfield light pole and associated ground equipment within a
limited area. The project represents a small utility
installation and does not result in a significant expansion of the existing use of the site.
10. Lead Agency Contact Person:
Telephone: Eduardo Galdamez, AICP, Assistant Planner
(951) 739-4973
11. If filed by applicant: Attach Preliminary Exemption Assessment (Form “A”) before filing.
12. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes ☒ No ☐
13. Was a public hearing held by the Lead Agency to consider the exemption? Yes ☒ No ☐ If yes, the date of the public hearing was: July 6, 2026 ________________________________
Signature Date: July 6, 2026
________________________________
Name Title: Assistant Planner
☒ Signed by Lead Agency ☐ Signed by Applicant
Date Received for Filing: Click to enter date
(Clerk Stamp Here)
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code.
Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 6, 2026
TO: Honorable Chair and Commissioners
FROM: Eduardo Galdamez, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: Revised Project Plans for Public Hearing Item No. 6.1, CUP2025-0002 Following preparation of the staff report for Item No. 6.1 (Conditional Use Permit CUP2025-0002) of this evening’s (July 6) Planning Commission hearing, the applicant informed staff that the pole of the proposed telecommunication facility (light pole) will have a wider base, with a maximum width of 36 inches (compared to the existing pole which has a base measuring 14 inches). According to the applicant, the wider width in the new pole is needed to accommodate coaxial cables that will run through the inside of the pole and support the weight of the transmission equipment. In addition, the mounted antenna configuration had been revised with the largest antennas relocated to the lowest RAD center height (essentially “flipping” the previous configuration). No change is proposed to the number of antennas nor to the overall height of the proposed tower. The applicant has provided revised plans illustrating the proposed facility and which are attached as Exhibit 1. Staff also requested photo-simulations to better visualize the updated design, but the applicant will be unable to provide these materials before the hearing.
Attachments:
1. Revised project plans
CC:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]