Cities Index.
Public Comments

Costa Mesa City Council
January 18, 2022

Document
Public Comments
Meeting
January 18, 2022
Body
Costa Mesa City Council
Original file
764 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on costamesa.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

From: David Martinez <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 10:05 PM
To: "REYNOLDS, ARLIS" <[email protected]>
Subject: NB-2 Suggest Off-Site Improvements

Hello,

Here are some suggested off-site improvements that could be made at Superior and Industrial (using some numbering from the Pedestrian Master Plan that is in development):

A1/A5 (Sidewalk Network/Missing Sidewalks) - There are sidewalks in the area that...don't exist. Close by is NB Pomona and a bit further away is SB Old Newport.

A3 (Separate Bike Facility) - Needed so that pedestrians and bikes aren't using the same area.

A13 (Curb Ramps) - Directional curb ramps are needed at the intersection A14 (Curb Extensions/Bulb Outs) - Would encourage tighter and slower turns B9 (Adding Missing Crosswalks) - Going SB on Superior there is a missing crosswalk.

B13 (Pedestrian Countdown Signals) - No countdowns on most ped signals B18 (Leading Ped Interval) - Should be standard in CM
B19 (Regulating right on red) - Going from SB Superior and turning right is already prohibited, but because this intersection is so complicated I think this is a good candidate to ban it for every right turn.

B21 (Redesign slip lanes) - I don't think that island in the intersection is technically a slip lane but it should be redesigned anyway. The largest issue I can see with a redesign to remove it is cars heading southbound on Pomona having to do a funky turn to continue south on Superior.

B22 (Walk sign always active) - This intersection is just weird and someone who wants to cross on a green may be walking into a car. If the walk signals are on every time a car won't be turning into the crosswalk then it's easy to know when it's safe.

C1 (Roadway Reconfigurations) - Superior is a proposed Class II on the ATP

Thanks,
David M

← All documents from this meeting