1 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020 CITY OF COSTA MESA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PBK ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA PBK-WLC ARCHITECTS THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 15th day of February, 2022 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation (“City”), and PBK ARCHITECTS, INC. a Texas corporation DBA PBK-WLC ARCHITECTS (“Consultant”). W I T N E S S E T H : A. WHEREAS, City proposes to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent contractor to provide architectural and engineering services in connection with the reconstruction of Fire Station No. 2, as more fully described herein; and B. WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it has that degree of specialized expertise contemplated within California Government Code section 37103, and holds all necessary licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated; and C. WHEREAS, City and Consultant desire to contract for the specific services described in Exhibits “A” and “B” and desire to set forth their rights, duties and liabilities in connection with the services to be performed; and D. WHEREAS, no official or employee of City has a financial interest, within the provisions of sections 1090-1092 of the California Government Code, in the subject matter of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1.0. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT 1.1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall provide the professional services described in City’s Request for Proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and Consultant’s Proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit “B,” both incorporated herein. 1.2. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel experienced in their respective fields and in a manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound professional practices. Consultant also warrants that it is familiar with all laws that may affect its performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. 1.3. Performance to Satisfaction of City. Consultant agrees to perform all the work to the complete satisfaction of the City. Evaluations of the work will be done by the City Manager or his or her designee. If the quality of work is not satisfactory, City in its discretion has the right to: (a) Meet with Consultant to review the quality of the work and resolve the 2 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020 matters of concern; (b) Require Consultant to repeat the work at no additional fee until it is satisfactory; and/or (c) Terminate the Agreement as hereinafter set forth. 1.4. Warranty. Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services required by this Agreement in compliance with all applicable Federal and California employment laws, including, but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational health and safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers’ compensation insurance and safety in employment; and all other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every nature and description including attorneys’ fees and costs, presented, brought, or recovered against City for, or on account of any liability under any of the above-mentioned laws, which may be incurred by reason of Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. 1.5. Non-Discrimination. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall not engage in, nor permit its agents to engage in, discrimination in employment of persons because of their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military or veteran status, except as permitted pursuant to section 12940 of the Government Code. 1.6. Non-Exclusive Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that City may enter into agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services contemplated by this Agreement. 1.7. Delegation and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written consent of City. Consultant may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may employ other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at Consultant’s sole cost and expense. 1.8. Confidentiality. Employees of Consultant in the course of their duties may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of private individuals and employees of City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 2.0. COMPENSATION AND BILLING 2.1. Compensation. Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit “C,” attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “Fee Schedule”). Consultant’s total compensation shall not exceed Seven Hundred Thirty Thousand Dollars ($730,000.00). 3 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020
2.2. Additional Services. Consultant shall not receive compensation for any services provided outside the scope of services specified in the Consultant’s Proposal unless the City Manager or designee, prior to Consultant performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is specifically understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or additional compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable. 2.3. Method of Billing. Consultant may submit invoices to the City for approval on a progress basis, but no more often than two times a month. Said invoice shall be based on the total of all Consultant’s services which have been completed to City’s sole satisfaction. Each invoice shall describe in detail, the services performed, the date of performance, and the associated time for completion. When invoicing City for reimbursable expenses as outlined in Exhibit C, Consultant shall provide copies of all relevant invoices, receipts or other documentation as may be reasonably requested by City. Any additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as “Additional Services” and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable, on all invoices. City shall pay Consultant’s invoice within forty-five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. 2.4. Records and Audits. Records of Consultant’s services relating to this Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be made available to City or its Project Manager for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times from the Effective Date until three (3) years after termination of this Agreement. 3.0. TIME OF PERFORMANCE 3.1. Commencement and Completion of Work. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties, the professional services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall commence within five (5) days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. Said services shall be performed in strict compliance with the project schedule agreed upon by City and Consultant. Failure to commence work in a timely manner and/or diligently pursue work to completion may be grounds for termination of this Agreement. 3.2. Excusable Delays. Neither party shall be responsible for delays or lack of performance resulting from acts beyond the reasonable control of the party or parties. Such acts shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God, fire, strikes, pandemics, material shortages, compliance with laws or regulations, riots, acts of war, or any other conditions beyond the reasonable control of a party (each, a “Force Majeure Event”). If a party experiences a Force Majeure Event, the party shall, within five (5) days of the occurrence of the Force Majeure Event, give written notice to the other party stating the nature of the Force Majeure Event, its anticipated duration and any action being taken to avoid or minimize its effect. Any suspension of performance shall be of no greater scope and of no longer duration than is reasonably required and the party experiencing the Force Majeure Event shall use best efforts without being obligated to incur any material expenditure to remedy its inability to perform; provided, however, if the suspension of performance continues for sixty (60) days after the date of the occurrence and such failure to perform would constitute a material breach of this Agreement in the absence of such Force Majeure Event, the parties shall meet and discuss in good faith any amendments to this Agreement to permit the other party to exercise its rights under this Agreement. If the parties are not able to agree on such amendments within thirty (30) days and if suspension of performance continues, such other party may terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the party experiencing the Force Majeure Event, in which case neither party shall have any liability to the other except for those rights and liabilities that accrued prior to the date of termination. 4 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020
4.0. TERM AND TERMINATION 4.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for a period of five (5) years, ending on February 14, 2027, unless previously terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. 4.2. Notice of Termination. The City reserves and has the right and privilege of canceling, suspending or abandoning the execution of all or any part of the work contemplated by this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time, by providing written notice to Consultant. The termination of this Agreement shall be deemed effective upon receipt of the notice of termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall immediately stop rendering services under this Agreement unless directed otherwise by the City. 4.3. Compensation. In the event of termination, City shall pay Consultant for reasonable costs incurred and professional services satisfactorily performed up to and including the date of City’s written notice of termination. Compensation for work in progress shall be prorated based on the percentage of work completed as of the effective date of termination in accordance with the fees set forth herein. In ascertaining the professional services actually rendered hereunder up to the effective date of termination of this Agreement, consideration shall be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings, and to other documents pertaining to the services contemplated herein whether delivered to the City or in the possession of the Consultant. 4.4. Documents. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents prepared by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to, finished or unfinished design, development and construction documents, data studies, drawings, maps and reports, shall be delivered to the City within ten (10) days of delivery of termination notice to Consultant, at no cost to City. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization from Consultant shall be at City’s sole risk and without liability or legal expense to Consultant. 5.0. INSURANCE 5.1. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain, maintain, and keep in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement all of the following minimum scope of insurance coverages with an insurance company admitted to do business in California, rated “A,” Class X, or better in the most recent Best’s Key Insurance Rating Guide, and approved by City: (a) Commercial general liability, including premises-operations, products/completed operations, broad form property damage, blanket contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily injury with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this Agreement or shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (b) Business automobile liability for owned vehicles, hired, and non-owned vehicles, with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. 5 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020 (c) Workers’ compensation insurance as required by the State of California. Consultant agrees to waive, and to obtain endorsements from its workers’ compensation insurer waiving subrogation rights under its workers’ compensation insurance policy against the City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers arising from work performed by Consultant for the City and to require each of its subcontractors, if any, to do likewise under their workers’ compensation insurance policies. (d) Professional errors and omissions (“E&O”) liability insurance with policy limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence and aggregate. Architects’ and engineers’ coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. If the policy is written as a “claims made” policy, the retro date shall be prior to the start of the contract work. Consultant shall obtain and maintain, said E&O liability insurance during the life of this Agreement and for three years after completion of the work hereunder. 5.2. Endorsements. The commercial general liability insurance policy and business automobile liability policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions: (a) Additional insureds: “The City of Costa Mesa and its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers are additional insureds with respect to: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant pursuant to its contract with the City; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the Consultant.” (b) Notice: “Said policy shall not terminate, be suspended, or voided, nor shall it be cancelled, nor the coverage or limits reduced, until thirty (30) days after written notice is given to City.” (c) Other insurance: “The Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Costa Mesa, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers. Any other insurance maintained by the City of Costa Mesa shall be excess and not contributing with the insurance provided by this policy.” (d) Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Costa Mesa, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers. (e) The Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. 5.3. Deductible or Self Insured Retention. If any of such policies provide for a deductible or self-insured retention to provide such coverage, the amount of such deductible or self-insured retention shall be approved in advance by City. No policy of insurance issued as to which the City 6 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020 is an additional insured shall contain a provision which requires that no insured except the named insured can satisfy any such deductible or self-insured retention. 5.4. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide to City certificates of insurance showing the insurance coverages and required endorsements described above, in a form and content approved by City, prior to performing any services under this Agreement. 5.5. Non-Limiting. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting in any way, the indemnification provision contained in this Agreement, or the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property. 6.0. GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing, and signed by the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including exhibits to this Agreement. 6.2. Representatives. The City Manager or his or her designee shall be the representative of City for purposes of this Agreement and may issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of the City, called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. Consultant shall designate a representative for purposes of this Agreement who shall be authorized to issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of Consultant called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. 6.3. Project Managers. City shall designate a Project Manager to work directly with Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall designate a Project Manager who shall represent it and be its agent in all consultations with City during the term of this Agreement. Consultant or its Project Manager shall attend and assist in all coordination meetings called by City. 6.4. Notices. Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery or mail and shall be addressed as set forth below. Such communication shall be deemed served or delivered: (a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal delivery, and (b) 48 hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such communication is sent through regular United States mail. IF TO CONSULTANT: IF TO CITY: PBK-WLC Architects 8163 Rochester Ave., Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tel: (909) 238-7030 Tel: (714) 754-5096 Attn: Kelley Needham Attn: Arash Rahimian 7 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020 Courtesy copy to: City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Attn: Finance Dept. | Purchasing 6.5. Drug-Free Workplace Policy. Consultant shall provide a drug-free workplace by complying with all provisions set forth in City’s Council Policy 100-5, attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant’s failure to conform to the requirements set forth in Council Policy 100-5 shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and shall be cause for immediate termination of this Agreement by City. 6.6. Attorneys’ Fees. In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms, conditions, or provisions hereof. 6.7. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in Orange County, California. 6.8. Assignment. Consultant shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign, transfer, sublet or encumber all or any part of Consultant’s interest in this Agreement without City’s prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or encumbrance shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for termination of this Agreement. Regardless of City’s consent, no subletting or assignment shall release Consultant of Consultant’s obligation to perform all other obligations to be performed by Consultant hereunder for the term of this Agreement. 6.9. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, hold free and harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, at Consultant’s sole expense, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits or other legal proceedings brought against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees arising out of the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, in the performance of the work undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. The defense obligation provided for hereunder shall apply without any advance showing of negligence or wrongdoing by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, but shall be required whenever any claim, action, complaint, or suit asserts as its basis the negligence, errors, omissions or misconduct of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, and/or whenever any claim, action, complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees based upon negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct in the work performed by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant shall not be liable for the defense or indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints or suits arising out of the sole active negligence or willful 8 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020 misconduct of the City. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to Consultant exceed Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault. However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, Consultant shall meet and confer with other parties regarding unpaid defense costs. This provision shall supersede and replace all other indemnity provisions contained either in the City’s specifications or Consultant’s Proposal, which shall be of no force and effect. 6.10. Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall be acting at all times as an independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of City. Consultant shall secure, at its sole expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of Income Tax, Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, and other payroll deductions for Consultant and its officers, agents, and employees, and all business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with the applicable worker’s compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this paragraph. 6.11. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 6.12. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation which City might require. 6.13. Ownership of Documents. All findings, reports, documents, information and data including, but not limited to, computer tapes or discs, files and tapes furnished or prepared by Consultant or any of its subcontractors in the course of performance of this Agreement, shall be 9 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020 and remain the sole property of City. Consultant agrees that any such documents or information shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior consent of City. Any use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement, and any use of incomplete documents, shall be at the sole risk of City and without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. City shall indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from City’s use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement or use of incomplete documents furnished by Consultant. Consultant shall deliver to City any findings, reports, documents, information, data, in any form, including but not limited to, computer tapes, discs, files audio tapes or any other Project related items as requested by City or its authorized representative, at no additional cost to the City. 6.14. Public Records Act Disclosure. Consultant has been advised and is aware that this Agreement and all reports, documents, information and data, including, but not limited to, computer tapes, discs or files furnished or prepared by Consultant, or any of its subcontractors, pursuant to this Agreement and provided to City may be subject to public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act (California Government Code section 6250 et seq.). Exceptions to public disclosure may be those documents or information that qualify as trade secrets, as that term is defined in the California Government Code section 6254.7, and of which Consultant informs City of such trade secret. The City will endeavor to maintain as confidential all information obtained by it that is designated as a trade secret. The City shall not, in any way, be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any trade secret including, without limitation, those records so marked if disclosure is deemed to be required by law or by order of the Court. 6.15. Conflict of Interest. Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subconsultants, if any, will comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California applicable to Consultant's services under this agreement, including, but not limited to, the Political Reform Act (Government Code sections 81000, et seq.) and Government Code section 1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subconsultants shall not, without the prior written approval of the City Representative, perform work for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing work that would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or subconsultants to abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute. 6.16. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Consultant, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City’s representative, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Consultant occurs, then Consultant shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design drawings, estimates and other Consultant professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. 6.17. Prohibited Employment. Consultant will not employ any regular employee of City while this Agreement is in effect. 6.18. Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement and any of the attached Exhibits, the terms set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. If, and to the extent this Agreement incorporates by reference any provision of any document, such provision shall be deemed a part of this Agreement. Nevertheless, if there is any conflict among the terms and conditions of this Agreement and those of any such provision or provisions so incorporated by 10 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020 reference, this Agreement shall govern over the document referenced. 6.19. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as expressly provided herein. 6.20. Binding Effect. This Agreement binds and benefits the parties and their respective permitted successors and assigns. 6.21. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole benefit of City and Consultant and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right in, under or to this Agreement. 6.22. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 6.23. Construction. The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement and have had an adequate opportunity to review each and every provision of the Agreement and submit the same to counsel or other consultants for review and comment. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement. 6.24. Amendments. Only a writing executed by the parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement. 6.25. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. 6.26. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any party, is materially impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or arbitrator of competent jurisdiction shall be binding, then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s) through good faith negotiations. 6.27. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one agreement. 6.28. Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the 11 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020 parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by doing so the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above written. CONSULTANT __________________________________ Date: __________________________ Signature __________________________________ [Name and Title] CITY OF COSTA MESA __________________________________ Date: __________________________ Lori Ann Farrell Harrison City Manager ATTEST: __________________________________ Brenda Green City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Date: __________________________ Kimberly Hall Barlow City Attorney APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE: __________________________________ Date: __________________________ Ruth Wang Risk Management 12 PBK Architects, Inc. dba PBK-WLC Architects Rev. 11-2020 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: __________________________________ Date: __________________________ Arash Rahimian Project Manager DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL: __________________________________ Date: __________________________ Raja Sethuraman Public Services Director APPROVED AS TO PURCHASING: __________________________________ Date: __________________________ Carol Molina Finance Director
EXHIBIT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
EXHIBIT B CONSULTANT’S PROPOSAL
Fire Station 2
City of Costa Mesa
PROPOSAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES
FIRE STATION 2
FREMONT, CA
October 13, 2021 Mr . Arash Rahimian
Senior Engineer
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92628
Re:
Pr
oposal for Architectural and Engineering Services
Fir
e Station 2
City of Cos
ta Mesa
Dear Mr. Rahimian,
On behalf of PBK-WLC Architects and our entire consulting team, thank you for the opportunity to submit our proposal for the City of Costa Mesa's new fire station project. As you may already be aware, our firm specializes in the planning and design of public safety and essential service facilities. We have designed over 200 such facilities, each of which is specifically tailored to the unique requirements of the fire department and the communities they serve. Having recently completed Costa Mesa Fire Station 1 and having extensive knowledge of the design requirements of the Orange County Fire Authority, we believe our experience makes us uniquely qualified for your new station.
I will be the Principal-in-Charge of the project and will be the main point of contact from design through construction. All work will be completed in a combined effort between our offices in Rancho Cucamonga and Costa Mesa.
Thank you again for this opportunity. If you should have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at any time. We look forward to continuing our relationship with the City of Costa Mesa.
Very truly yours,
KELLEY NEEDHAM, AIA
Managing Partner, CFO
[email protected]
Cell: (909) 238-7030
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OUR FIRM
Introduction
Better Together
EXPERIENCE
Public Safety
Sustainable Design
Recent Projects
KEY PERSONNEL
PBK-WLC Team
Consulting Team
Organization Chart
PROJECT APPROACH
Understanding
Design Team Methodology
Scope of Work
Site Specific Services
SCHEDULE
Preliminary Schedule
APPENDIX
Resumes
References
1 3
9 13
19 21
ARFF STATION 80
LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
1 Our Firm
ESTABLISHED IN 1974 | BASED IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
A. INTRODUCTION
WLC Architects, Inc. is a 91
person architectural firm located
in Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The firm was started in 1974 and
was originally known as Wolff/
Lang/Christopher Architects.
Over time, the firm came to be
known simply as WLC. Our work
is divided for the most part into
educational and public works
projects. Since we completed
our first public facility over 40
years ago, we have strived to
become experts in the areas
of fire, police, municipal, and
community facilities throughout
California. We have designed
hundreds of public facilities, each
of which is specifically tailored
to the unique requirements of
the communities they serve.
As department needs have
changed, so has WLC. We have
expanded our expertise to
include drill towers and training
facilities, vehicle maintenance,
dispatch centers, and emergency
operations centers. WLC is
proud to be considered one of
the leaders in the design of
municipal and civic facilities.
B. BETTER TOGETHER
In October 2020, WLC Architects
merged with PBK Architects to
form PBK-WLC. The merger
has been in the planning stages
for several years in order to
maintain a seamless transition
in regard to customer service,
quality, and attention to detail.
With 20 offices nationwide and
over 550 design professionals,
PBK-WLC is one of the largest
architectural firms in the country
and continues to embrace
a culture which prioritizes
customer service.
2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA
8163 Rochester Avenue, Suite 100
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
909.987.0909
COSTA MESA
600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1375
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
949.548.5000
SAN DIEGO
11455 El Camino Real, Suite 480
San Diego, CA 92130
619.695.0400
SAN LUIS OBISPO
1327 Archer Street, Suite 110
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
805.329.3076
VENTURA COUNTY
2751 Park View Court, Suite 251
Oxnard, CA 93036
805.947.3200
BERKELEY
2600 Tenth Street, Suite 700
Berkeley, CA 94710
510.450.1999
FOLSOM
1110 Iron Point Road, Suite 200
Folsom, CA 95630
916.355.9922
FRESNO
7790 North Palm Avenue, Suite 300
Fresno, CA 93711
559.448.8400
SACRAMENTO
2520 Venture Oaks, Suite 440
Sacramento, CA 95833
916.682.9494
PRIMARY DISCIPLINE, RESOURCE AND SERVICES
PBK-WLC provides complete architectural services, urban and regional planning, and interior design. Structural, civil, electrical, mechanical, acoustical engineering, and landscape architecture are all provided by retention of appropriate consultants highly experienced within the desired disciplines.
CURRENT WORKLOAD
The current workload of the staff listed in this Proposal is such that we are in an excellent position to begin your project immediately. The entire project team will remain with your project through completion. Work will be performed in a combined effort between our offices in Rancho Cucamonga and Costa Mesa.
FINANCIAL REFERENCES
Mr. Vince Gottuso, Citizens Business Bank. 909.483.4301 Mr. Scott Maxwell, Swenson Corporation. 909.989.5867
Ms. Norah L. Small, Dealey, Renton & Associates. 626.696.1895
INSURANCE
A general liability insurance policy with a minimum coverage limit of $2.0 million is carried by the firm as standard coverage. A professional liability insurance and errors and omissions with minimum coverage limits of $2.0 million is carried by the firm as standard coverage. Insurance will be in place at the time of contract execution.
PRESENT FIRM SIZE | 550 PERSONNEL
POSITION FIRM WIDE CALIFORNIA
Architects 98 30
Engineers 85 35
Designers 35 25
Construction Administration 12 3
Other & Facilities 165 72
Specifications 10 5
Roofing/Facilities 35 5
Admin/Corporate 75 50
Field Representatives 35 25
TOTAL 550 250
3 Experience
With over 40 years of experience, PBK-WLC is a leader in the field of essential service facilities. Our work has been recognized at state and national levels by the American Institute of Architects, International Association of Fire Chiefs, International Association of Police Chiefs, California Energy Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the California Parks and Recreation Society. Stations in RED were completed for the OCFA.
A. PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE STATIONS
•
Anaheim Fir
e Station 5
•
Ne
wport Beach Fire Station 2
•
Mont
erey Park Fire Station 62
•
Cos
ta Mesa Fire Station 1
•
Ne
wport Beach Fire Station 5
•
Eas
tvale Fire Station 31
•
Sender
o Ranch Fire Station 56
•
F
ontana Fire Station 73
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station 15
•
Malibu Fir
e Station 71
•
San Diego Fir
e Station 45
•
Ont
ario Fire Station 9
•
V
ernon Fire Station 4
•
T
ustin Fire Station 37
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station 39
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station 7
•
Carlsbad Fir
e Station 3
•
Bonsall Fir
e Station 5
•
Hesperia Fir
e Station 301
•
Mec
ca Fire Station 40
•
Simi V
alley Fire Station 47
•
F
ontana Fire Station 71
•
Rialt
o Fire Station 202
•
Cypr
ess Fire Station 17
•
Chino Fir
e Station 1
•
Chino Fir
e Station 7
•
Sc
ottsdale Fire Station 8
•
San Mat
eo Fire Station 23
•
St
anton Fire Station 46
•
Sc
ottsdale Fire Station 1
•
LAX - ARFF St
ation 80
•
San Jose Fir
e Station 2
•
F
remont Fire Station 11
•
Esc
ondido Fire & Police HQ
•
Hesperia Fir
e Station 305
•
F
remont Fire Station 2
•
Cul
ver City Fire Station 3
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station 81
•
Thousand P
alms Fire Station 35
•
Indio Fir
e Station 5
•
F
remont Fire Station 6
•
Esc
ondido Fire Station 7
•
Esc
ondido Fire Station 6
•
Y
ucaipa Fire Station 3
•
Cabazon Fir
e Station 24
•
Esc
ondido Fire Station 3
•
Carlsbad Fir
e Station 6
•
Hous
ton Fire Station 8
•
San Mar
cos Fire Station 4
•
Anaheim Fir
e Station 11
•
Lak
e Forest Fire Station 19
•
Americ
an Canyon Fire & Police
•
Atw
ater Fire Station 2/Police
•
F
remont Fire Station 8
•
Chino Fir
e Station 63
•
Dana P
oint Fire Station 29
•
F
airbanks Headquarters Fire Station
•
San Mar
cos Fire Station 2
•
Mer
ced Fire Station 55
•
R
ancho Cucamonga Fire Station 173
•
San Bernar
dino Fire Station 232
•
Nor
co Fire Station 47
•
Gilr
oy Fire Station 3
•
La Quint
a Fire Station 93
•
A
valon Fire Station 1
•
R
ancho Cucamonga Fire Station 6
•
Cor
ona Fire Station 7
•
Cl
ovis Police and Fire Facility
•
Sant
a Monica Fire Station 2
•
Anchor
age Headquarters Fire Station 1
•
F
ontana Fire Station 78
•
San Mar
cos Fire Station 1
•
Chino Hills Fir
e Station 62
•
Burbank Fir
e and Police Facility
•
T
emecula Fire Station 84
•
Riv
erside Fire Station 12
•
Ar
cadia Fire Station 2
•
F
ontana Fire Station 77
•
Cul
ver City Headquarters Fire Station 1
•
F
ontana Fire Station 74
•
R
ancho Cucamonga Fire Station 5
4 ARFF STATIONS
•
Los Angel
es International Airport, ARFF Station 80
•
John W
ayne Airport, ARFF Station 33
•
P
ortland International Airport, ARFF Station 89
TRAINING FACILITIES
•
Ont
ario Training Center
•
Cul
ver City Training Center
•
Dinuba Public Saf
ety Training Facility
•
F
remont Tactical Training Center
•
Chino T
raining Facility
•
R
oy Wilson Training Center
•
Los Angel
es Valley Recruit Training Center
•
P
oway Fire Training Facility
•
San Mar
cos Emergency Services Training Facility
REMODELS
•
Ne
wport Beach Fire Station 3
•
Chino Headquart
ers Facility
•
Chino FIr
e Station 6
•
Oc
eanside Police Evidence Facility
•
Or
ange Fire Station 2
•
Ne
wport Beach Police Facility
•
Mont
erey Park Fire Station 61
•
P
asadena Fire Station 39
•
P
asadena Fire Station 32
•
North Net Fir
e Training Center
•
Anaheim Fir
e Station 8
•
El Cajon Fir
e Station 7
•
Nor
co Fire Station 21
•
Ont
ario Fire Stations 2
•
Ont
ario Fire Stations 3
•
Ont
ario Fire Stations 4
•
Ont
ario Fire Stations 5
•
Hesperia Fir
e Station 304
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station 89
•
R
ancho Cucamonga Fire Stations 1
•
R
ancho Cucamonga Fire Station 2
•
R
ancho Cucamonga Fire Station 4
•
R
ancho Cucamonga Fire Station 5
•
R
ancho Cucamonga Maintenance Facility
C. RECENT PROJECTS
The following pages provide some additional
information on specific projects in progress or recently completed by our firm:
B. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
PBK-WLC is a member of the United States Green
Building Council (USGBC), and has participated with
the USGBC's Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED) program on a variety of projects. Twenty- two members of the firm are LEED Certified Green
Building Professionals.
PROJECT NAME LEED LEVEL
Cos
ta Mesa Fire Station 1
Gol
d
American Honda Distribution Center
Gol
d
Glendale Pacific Park Aquatic Center
Gol
d
Glendale Water & Power Stores Building
Sil
ver
Glendale Water & Power Training Building
Sil
ver
Haskett Public Library
Certified
Lane
y College Student Center
Gol
d
Pocket Greenhaven Library
Sil
ver
Merritt College Allied Health Center
Gol
d
WLC Rancho Office
Gol
d
WLC Berkeley Office
Sil
ver
Los Angel
es Fire Station No. 7
Sil
ver
Los Angeles Fire Station No. 39
Sil
ver
Cathedral City Fire Station 411
Sil
ver
Chino Fire Station 1
Sil
ver
Chino Training Center
Sil
ver
Chino Fire Station 7
Sil
ver
CSU San Marcos Public Safety Building
Gol
d
Fremont Fire Station 2
Sil
ver
Fremont Fire Station 6
Certified
F
remont Fire Station 11
Gol
d
LAX ARFF Station 80
Gol
d
Napa County Sheriff
Gol
d
San Diego Fire Station 45
Sil
ver
San Marcos Fire Station 4
Gol
d
San Mateo Fire Station 23
Sil
ver
Scottsdale Fire Station 1
Platinum
Sc
ottsdale Fire Station 8
Platinum
T
ustin Fire Station 37
Certified
V
alley Recruit Training and Fire Station 81
Sil
ver
5 Fire Station 5
Escondido, CA
Project Cost: $6,649,446
Square Footage: 8,313
Completion Date:
Oct
ober 2020
Contact:
Mr. Nathan Complin
Project Executive
Erickson-Hall Construction Company
(760) 801-4284
[email protected]
Project Description:
Fire Station 5 is a new 8,313 sf facility built for the Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District. Located in the Harmony Grove Village, the station is intended to be an integral part of the new master planned community. The single story station is designed to accommodate 5 fire fighters in an individual dorm setting. Other station features include a 3-bay apparatus room, administrative offices, kitchen, dining room, exercise room, and the various support spaces required for a facility of this type. The station also features a large meeting room for use in training or community events. Site features include secured fire fighter parking, on-site fueling, emergency generator, hose drying rack, and artificial turf. The station was designed to reflect the rural aesthetic adopted by the Harmony Grove Residential Development. Plaster and cementitious wood siding are used in varying amounts to help distribute the overall building massing.
Fire Station 5/Library
Newport Beach, CA
Project Cost: $6,389,186
Square Footage: 10,314
Completion Date:
Sept
ember 2019
Contact:
Mr. Jim Boland
Captain
Newport Beach Fire Department
(714) 915-4896
[email protected]
Project Description:
Faced with the need to replace two aging facilities on adjacent sites, the City of Newport Beach opted to combine two distinct building types into a single facility. Known affectionately as “The Fibrary,” the project combines Fire Station 5 and the branch library for Corona Del Mar. Located at the edge of a small scale residential area, both the fire station and library were considered essential by members of the community. Through a series of community workshops and informational presentations, we were able to work through the distinct issues that come with a combined facility of this type. The fire station features a 2-bay, single- deep apparatus room with drive-through capability and individual dormitories for a crew of six. Other areas include administrative offices, kitchen and dining room, exercise room, and the various support spaces required for a facility of this type. The library portion of the facility includes areas for children, teens, and adults. Both traditional and casual furniture are combined to create an open flow between the different areas. Other areas include a staff work room, storage, and public restrooms. The work of a local artist, Rex Brandt, was incorporated into selected areas of the interior to further combine the different areas.
6 Fire Station 3
Carlsbad, CA
Project Cost: $5,437,000
Square Footage: 11,311
Completion Date:
January 2016
Cont
act:
Mr. Mike Lopez
Deputy Fire Chief
Murrieta Fire & Rescue
(760) 212-2569
[email protected]
Project Description:
Fire Station 3 is a new 11,311 sf facility built by the City of Carlsbad. The site is located adjacent to a future park in a predominantly residential area. The Station is designed to accommodate eight fire fighters in an individual dormitory setting. Other Station features include a 3-bay, double-deep apparatus room, administrative offices, kitchen, dining room, day room, physical training room, and the various support spaces required for a facility of this type. A prominent interior feature is a two-story lobby space which includes enlarged historical fire department images as well as a demonstration fire pole. The pole is accessible through a hidden mezzanine area and can be easily accessed by fire fighters for school tours and special demonstrations. Site features include visitor parking, secured fire fighter parking, sand pit, covered patio, and an exercise station. The station is designed using a combination of plaster, brick, and pre-cast concrete. The design intent was to create a Station that was not only civic in nature but included the more traditional elements requested by the Fire Department.
Fire Station 56
Rancho Mission Viejo, CA
Project Cost: $4,500,000
Square Footage: 9,543
Completion Date:
Jul
y 2015
Contact:
Mr. Chris DeCoursey
Construction Manager
Orange County Fire Authority
(714) 573-6473
[email protected]
Project Description:
The new Fire Station 56 sits on a one-acre site located in the Sendero Ranch Residential Village. To match the style of the development, the station was designed in an architectural style that has come to be associated with the modernist architect Irving Gill. The station features a three-bay, double-deep apparatus room, administrative office areas, kitchen, dining room, day room, physical training room, eight person dormitory, shop, medical supply storage, and the various support spaces required for a facility of this type. Site features include secured fire fighter parking, fuel station, emergency generator and an open patio area.
The project was completed utilizing the design-build project delivery method in conjunction with Erickson-Hall Construction Co.
7 Fire Station 1
Costa Mesa, CA
Project Cost: $6,867,000
Square Footage: 11,675
Completion Date:
Jul
y 2018
Contact:
Mr. Jason Pyle
Division Chief
Costa Mesa Fire Department
(714) 754-5069
[email protected]
8 9
Key Personnel
The staff which we propose for the Project Team is highly experienced and well qualified in the planning and design of public safety facilities. Our team members are skilled professionals having extensive experience in the assessment of space needs, site and building analysis, programming, interior design, and organizational management.
A. PBK-WLC TEAM
KELLEY NEEDHAM, Principal-In-Charge
Mr. Needham is a Principal of the firm and will serve
as the Project Architect for all phases of the project.
Mr. Needham will be the main project contact and shall
provide the special expertise related to Fire Station design.
Mr. Needham will be working closely with the City and
Fire Department staff, as well as coordinating the efforts required of our consulting team.
BERNHARD WASSINK, Project Manager
Mr. Wassink will serve as Project Manager and will be
primarily responsible for the layout and design of the
project. Mr. Wassink will also be responsible to ensure all programmatic and code requirements are met.
During the design phase, Mr. Wassink will be responsible for producing design presentations and other visual
communication materials. Mr. Wassink will coordinate
the preparation of the final construction documents and provide administrative support throughout the entire
construction process.
FRANK CUOMO, Quality/Cost Assurance
Mr. Cuomo has been with the firm since 1985 and
serves as our Quality Assurance/Cost Coordinator. Mr.
Cuomo oversees the entire office's work in the areas of specifications, cost and quality control. He stays abreast of all recent governmental changes and product updates.
Most importantly he updates WLC's Contract Document
Checklist. This comprehensive document is used by the
design team and our consultants to ensure a thorough
review of your project prior to the start of construction. 10 CIVIL ENGINEERING
civTEC
999 Corporate Drive, Suite 100
Ladera Ranch, CA 92694
(949) 463-8822
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
R.M. Byrd and Associates, Inc.
1047 West Sixth Street, Suite A
Ontario, CA 91762
(909) 983-5599
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Pocock Design Solutions
14451 Chambers Road #210
Tustin, CA 92780
(949) 417-3903
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
A&F Engineering Group, Inc.
9320 Baseline Road, Suite C
Alta Loma, CA 91701
(909) 941-3008
ENVIRONMENTAL
Chambers Group, Inc.
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 750
Santa Ana, CA 92707
(949) 261-5414
B. CONSULTING TEAM
We have selected our proposed consulting team based upon their combined technical expertise and capabilities for performing necessary consulting services on facilities of similar size and scope. Our consultants are not specialty consultants brought in to make up for our own lack of specific project experience. In most cases, we have a long history and close working relationship with each firm. All of our consultants utilize computer-aided design and management systems to interface with our own CAD systems. Specifically, our consulting team will be able to provide services in the following areas:
GEOTECHNICAL/SOILS
Leighton Consulting, Inc.
10532 Acacia Street, Suite B6
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 484-2205
FURNITURE
G/M Business Interiors
1099 West La Cadena Drive
Riverside, CA 92501
(800) 686-6583
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
KOA Corporation
2141 West Orangewood Avenue
Orange, CA 92868
(714) 573-0317
HAZARDOUS ASSESSMENT
Masek Consulting
23478 Sandstone Street
Mission Viejo, CA 92692
(949) 581-8503
ACOUSTICS
McKay Conant Hoover, Inc.
5655 Lindero Canyon Road, Suite 325
Westlake Village, CA 91362
(818) 991-9300
SUSTAINABILITY
Ecotype Consulting, Inc.
1000 New York Street, #107
Redlands, CA 92374
(909) 307-8987
HARDWARE
Architectural Hardware Services
150 East Meda Avenue, Suite 240
Glendora, CA 91741
(626) 852-8802
CONSTRUCTABILITY
STK Architecture, Inc.
42095 Zevo Drive, Suite A15
Temecula, CA 92590
(951) 296-9110
UTILITY SURVEYS
C Below
14280 Euclid Avenue
Chino, CA 91710
(888) 902-3569
11 C. ORGANIZATION CHART
City of Costa Mesa
Costa Mesa Fire Department
PBK-WLC
Kelley Needham
Principal-in-Charge
Project Architect
DESIGN TEAM
CONSULTANT TEAM
Bernhard Wassink
Project Manager
Frank Cuomo
Quality Assurance/Cost Coordinator
civTEC
Civil Engineering
R.M. Byrd and Associates
Structural Engineering
Pocock Design Solutions
Mechanical Engineering
A&F Engineering Group
Electrical Engineering
Chambers Group
Environmental
Leighton Consulting
Geotechnical
G/M Business Interiors
Furniture
KOA Corporation
Traffic Engineering
Masek Consulting
Hazardous Assessment
McKay Conant Hoover
Acoustics
Ecotype Consulting
Sustainability
Architectural Hardware Services
Hardware
STK Architecture
Constructability
C Below
Utility Surveys
FIRE STATION 3
CARLSBAD, CA
13 Project Approach
1. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE
The first and perhaps most important task during
the Schematic Design Phase will be to establish and
determine the best approach to the design of the
primary systems in the project. The architectural
program shall be developed. Alternative configurations
shall be quickly explored in order to evaluate the best opportunities. A design concept shall be formulated in
order to provide a sound basis for subsequent planning
and design decisions to occur. The design concept shall be utilized to evaluate advantages and disadvantages
of each potential alternative. Site and programmatic
factors, aesthetic quality, cost, and other key factors related to the project shall be utilized in order to form the basis of an evaluation. Through a variety of informal meetings with the project committee, a schematic
design concept shall be established.
During the Schematic Design Phase for your project,
the following tasks and deliverables have been
identified:
a. Master Site Plan
A master site plan shall be prepared in order to
describe all major site components and to illustrate
the overall site planning concept for the project. All
structures, parking areas, and circulation components
shall be identified. Areas of future expansion and/or
future phasing shall also be defined.
b. Preliminary Landscape Plan
A preliminary landscape plan shall be prepared in
order to illustrate proposed planting, landscaping
techniques, and design concepts. Drought resistant,
A. UNDERSTANDING
It is our understanding that the City of Costa Mesa would like to demolish and reconstruct Fire Station 2 on the
same site. Originally constructed in 1966, the building no longer meets the functional requirements of a fire station.
In addition to the new station, a new site plan will be developed and we anticipate revisions to the signalization along Baker Street. It is understood that a temporary
facility will need to be constructed on site for use by the Fire Department during construction.
B. DESIGN TEAM METHODOLOGY
Our firm consistently utilizes a Design Team approach
for establishing project delivery and control during all phases of planning and design. The primary contact will be our Principal-in-Charge, Kelley Needham, AIA. The
Principal-in-Charge will be responsible for coordinating our in-house architectural team and our consultant
team. The Team remains with the project from concept
through completion. Therefore, continuity of the project participants and of the process is achieved. The Design Team shall produce all necessary reports, studies,
drawings, models, renderings, and cost estimates, and
shall perform all necessary administrative, management, and coordination services throughout the entire course of the project.
C. SCOPE OF WORK
In addition to the items listed in the RFP, the following is a list of the basic tasks and deliverables anticipated for your new project. The scope has been divided into the five phases typically associated with architectural services:
14 low maintenance, and xeriscape techniques shall be defined.
A preliminary plant palette, identifying major tree and shrub species, shall be included.
c. Preliminary Floor Plans
A preliminary floor plan of each level for every structure proposed shall be prepared.
d. Exterior Elevations
Exterior elevations shall be prepared to illustrate all major views of the project. Elevations shall be drawn to depict scale, character, architectural vocabulary, and shall be delineated to communicate the aesthetic qualities of the project.
e. Schematic Design Opinion of Cost
A preliminary opinion of construction costs shall be prepared and included with the summary report.
f. Project Schedule
A comprehensive project schedule shall be prepared. The project schedule shall include anticipated time frames for each phase of the project as well as any other milestones required by the City.
2. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE
After completion of the Schematic Design Phase, the
design of the project shall be advanced into more detailed refinement by initiating the Design Development Phase. Our Design Team shall prepare design development documents
consisting of drawings, outline specifications, design
calculations, material/equipment submittals, fixture cuts, and a design development opinion of estimated construction cost.
Architectural, structural, electrical, and mechanical systems shall be further detailed and analyzed. Preliminary drawings shall be prepared for each of these systems and options which may exist shall be evaluated.
During the Design Development Phase, requirements for
cabinets, casework, hardware, and related specialties shall be determined. A preliminary furniture plan shall be prepared indicating usage and furniture layout of every work station, office, and support space. Final selection of materials, textures, and colors shall occur. The Design Development Phase is essentially the time when preliminary design proposals are refined to a level of detail and developed to a state such that final construction documents can be initiated. The Design Development Phase is the time when all final decisions pertaining to the proposed project are evaluated and finalized.
During the Design Development Phase, the following
tasks and deliverables have been identified:
a. Design Development Plans
Design development drawings shall be prepared in
order to fix and describe the size and character of
the entire project including architectural, structural, mechanical, and electrical design features.
b. Outline Specifications
Outline specifications shall be prepared in order
to identify and define the materials and system
components selected for the project. Outline
specifications shall be prepared in summary outline
form based on CSI format.
c. Basis of Design
A technical manual shall be assembled to organize
product literature and data for all materials, equipment, and fixtures selected for the project.
d. Building Code Analysis
Drawings, diagrams, and calculations shall be prepared
based upon all applicable building codes having
jurisdiction over the project. A preliminary occupancy
and exiting plan shall be prepared to identify the type of construction, type of occupancy, required fire rating/ separation, and location/number of exits required.
e. Design Development Opinion of Cost
An opinion of construction cost shall be prepared to
reflect the scope and anticipated construction costs as reflected by the design development documents.
f. Project Schedule
An updated project schedule shall be prepared and
submitted.
3. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE
The final Construction Document Phase of the project
generally consists of the preparation of the construction documents to include final drawings, specifications,
calculations, and final cost estimates. Our proposal
includes complete and comprehensive architectural
15 and engineering services required to execute the entire project. Specifically, we have included the following
disciplines:
1) Architectural
2) Civil Engineering
3) Structur
al Engineering
4) Mechanic
al Engineering
5) Electrical Engineering
6) Landsc
ape Architecture
During this phase, the Contract Documents are
prepared setting forth in detail the requirements for
the construction of the project. General conditions,
instructions to bidders, and all special requirements
are defined, and when combined with the various trade
specifications, a complete project manual is produced.
During the Construction Document Phase final cost
studies shall be prepared. A detailed opinion of
construction cost shall be prepared at the point where
final plans and specifications are approximately 50%
complete. Once construction documents have almost been
completed, a revised opinion of cost shall be prepared
at the level of approximately 90% completion. Allowable construction costs will be consistently monitored during the entire process in order to minimize the possibility of requiring major refinement or modification due to
budgetary limits.
The following tasks are specifically proposed for the
project:
a. Construction Drawings
Final construction drawings shall be prepared in order to describe and identify the spaces, sizes, volume, and location in detail for the construction of the project.
b. Project Manual
A project manual shall be prepared to include all
instructions to bidders, bidding forms, general conditions, supplementary special conditions, and the construction
trade sections for the project. The project manual
provides detailed technical information pertaining to the administration of the contract for construction, materials and equipment to be furnished, acceptable manufacturers, and the requirements for executing the work.
c. Final Design Calculations
Final design calculations shall be prepared and submitted with the final plans and specifications for review and
approval by governing agencies having jurisdiction over the project. Structural calculations, hydrology/drainage calculations, and mechanical/electrical (Title 24 Energy Compliance) shall be completed during this phase.
d. Opinion of Cost
A detailed opinion of construction costs shall be prepared at the point where plans and specifications are approximately 50% complete. A second cost opinion shall be prepared at the 90% completion point in order to address any refinement or modification occurring during the preparation of the construction documents. The cost opinion shall be prepared utilizing specific area and quantity take-offs applied to labor and material cost, and shall include allowance for general conditions, Contractor’s profit and overhead, and contingencies.
e. Final Plan Check
All final plans, specifications, and supporting calculations shall be submitted to appropriate agencies having
jurisdiction over the project. The final construction
documents shall be revised and amended in order to reflect any plan check requirements, and at this time, construction documents will be ready for competitive bidding.
4. BIDDING PHASE
During the Bidding Phase, the Architect shall provide
administrative support services to assist the City in obtaining FIRE STATION 45
SAN DIEGO, CA
16 competitive bids for the proposed project. The Architect shall respond to any questions, clarifications, or conflicts which may arise in the form of written addenda to the
contract documents. At this time, request for substitutions may be considered if allowed by the contract documents.
The Architect shall assist the City with an evaluation of the bids received and make a recommendation for award of
the contract for construction.
The following services for the Bidding Phase of the project are proposed:
a. Bidding Procedures and Administration
The Architect shall assist the City with the Bidding Phase of the project. Questions, clarifications, or conflicts arising out of the bidding process will be resolved by addenda
prepared by the Architect. Addenda to the contract for
construction shall be prepared in writing to document
any clarification or modification made to the contract
documents.
b. Evaluation of Bid Proposals
Upon receipt of all bid proposals, a review and evaluation shall be conducted by the Architect. The completeness
of each bid proposal shall be evaluated whenever
consideration exists to award to the proposing contracting entity. The completeness of the bid proposal, proposed
subcontractors, affidavit of signature and other special bid proposal requirements shall be reviewed by both the City and the Architect.
c. Notice to Award Construction Contract
Upon the completed review of appropriate bid proposals, the Architect shall provide a recommendation for
consideration regarding the potential award of the contract for construction.
5. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE
The Architect shall attend job site meetings at weekly
intervals in order to generally review and evaluate the construction schedule, monitor weekly performance,
review quality control standards, and provide assistance for any clarification or revision to the contract for
construction. Shop drawings and related submittals shall be reviewed and returned to the Architect for appropriate action. The Contractor’s requests for information, proposal requests, and related communications shall be attended
to on a regular basis. Contractor’s pay requests shall be reviewed by the Architect on a monthly basis in accordance with the amount of work completed and in accordance
with the contract documents. Upon completion of the
Construction Phase the Architect shall organize and
conduct a final walk-through and review. A final punch list for all required corrections and remaining work shall be prepared.
During the Construction Phase of the project, the following services shall be furnished:
a. Preconstruction Conference
A preconstruction conference shall be attended by the
Architect to brief all parties concerned with general and special requirements of the contract for construction.
Procedural matters, routing of information, and project representatives shall be defined. Attendees shall include representatives from the Fire Department, the Architect, the Contractor, and all major subcontractors.
b. Job Site Meetings
Job site meetings at weekly intervals shall be scheduled and attended by the Architect for the same day and
time through the duration of the project. Scheduling,
coordination, requests for information, and changes to the contract for construction are routinely monitored.
c. Submittal and Shop Drawing Review
The Architect shall review all required shop drawings and related submittals as required by the contract documents. d. Project Closeout
At the completion of the Construction Phase a final
job site meeting and review of the entire facility shall be conducted. A final punch list will be published and
distributed by the Architect to all parties concerned,
specifically noting required corrections, non-conforming work, and work remaining to be completed. A second
walk-through shall be conducted when all punch list
items have been corrected, at which time a Final Notice of Completion shall be filed by the City.
e. Record Documents
A set of final record documents will be created from the Contractor’s as-built drawings.
17 D. SITE SPECIFIC SERVICES
The following items are not typically found in the basic scope of architectural services. Based on the specifics of your site and our experience with projects of this type, we believe the following additional services will also be required:
a. Topographical Survey
A complete topographical and boundary survey shall be
furnished by the design team. The size, area, and overall configuration of the site area shall be accurately defined noting all existing conditions, improvements, utilities, and adjacent relationshiops.
b. Geotechnical Investigation
A geotechnical investigation shall be furnished by the
design team. The soils report shall be reviewed in order to determine existing soils conditions, soils characteristics, water table relationship to known seismic faults, and
overall soils suitability for the proposed project. Specific recommendations shall be made for soils preparation
related to the construction of footings, foundations, slabs, and various pavement sections.
c. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
Prepare a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) and electronically file a notice of intent (NOI) with the SWRCB SMARTS website in order to obtain a WDID number.
d. Environmental Planning
The design team will prepare all reports and documents
pursuant to the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and any adopted CEQA
precedures.
e. LEED Certification
The project will be designed in accordance with LEED
building design and construction version 4.
f. Traffic Engineering
Prepare traffic signal plans for modifications required on Baker Street.
g. Commissioning
Provide commissioning services to verify that systems and components installed are performing as intended.
h. Utility Survey
A survey and video investigation will be made of the
existing utility infrastructure. A condition report will be prepared along with any mitigation recommendations.
i. Soil Remediation
A work plan for UST investigation and removal will be
prepared for inclusion in the construction documents.
Sampling during removal will be conducted and a final
report prepared.
j. Acoustical Analysis
An acoustical study will be conducted on site to determine existing conditions. Potential construction noise will
be assessed and mitigation recommendations will be
prepared.
FIRE STATION 29
DANA POINT, CA
19 Schedule
A. PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE
The following schedule represents an estimated timeline of events for your new project. We have tried to list as many of the main events known to us that are typical for a project of this type. We have assumed a preliminary start date of January 2022.
If selected as your Architect, one of our first tasks will be to develop a comprehensive, overall project schedule.
Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | Phase 4 | Phase 5 Item/Description 2022 2023
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
1. Geotechnical Report
2. Develop Program
3. Develop Building/Site Design
4. Preliminary Cost Estimate
5. Development Review
6. Environmental Planning
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
1. Prepare Design Development Plans
2. Fixture and Equipment Book
3. Update Cost Estimate
4. Fire/City Review
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
1. Prepare Construction Documents
2. Building/Engineering Review
3. Update Cost Estimate
BIDDING AND NEGOTIATIONS
1. Bidding Period
2. Review Bids/Award of Contract
CONSTRUCTION
1. Job Site Meetings
2. Submittal and Shop Drawings
3. Punch List
4. Final Completion and Move-in
20 FIRE STATION 5/LIBRARY
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
Appendix
A. RESUMES
B. REFERENCES
CONCEPTUAL STUDY
FIRE STATION 2
CARLSBAD, CA
Kelley Needham Architect, Principal
Mr. Needham joined WLC Architects,
Inc. in April 1986. He has brought to
the firm a wide variety of experience
and expertise in project design and
construction document preparation.
His architectural education was
taught with a strong emphasis on
human needs and how to integrate
them into the built environment.
This emphasis was combined with a
methodical and logical design process
geared toward the achievement of
appropriate design solutions. He has
experience in a wide variety of project
types but has specialized in the
design of both public and essential
service facilities.
EDUCATION
California Polytechnic University, Pomona
Bachelor of Architecture, 1985
REGISTRATION
Architect, California - 19064
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Los Angeles Chapter
American Institute of Architects
FIRE STATIONS
•
F
ontana Fire Station 81
•
Or
ange Fire Station 1
•
Manhatt
an Beach Fire Station 2
•
Harmony Gr
ove Fire Station 5
•
Anaheim Fir
e Station 5
•
Ne
wport Beach Fire Station 2
•
Mont
erey Park Fire Station 62
•
Cos
ta Mesa Fire Station 1
•
Ne
wport Beach Fire Station 5
•
Eas
tvale Fire Station 31
•
Sender
o Ranch Fire Station 56
•
F
ontana Fire Station 73
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station 15
•
Malibu Fir
e Station 71
•
Carlsbad Fir
e Station 3
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station 7
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station 39
•
San Diego Fir
e Station 45
•
Bonsall Fir
e Station 5
•
Ont
ario Fire Station 9
•
V
ernon Fire Station 4
•
F
ontana Fire Station 71
•
Rialt
o Fire Station 2
•
Sc
ottsdale Fire Station 1
•
Sc
ottsdale Fire Station 8
•
St
anton Fire Station 46
•
Mec
ca Fire Station 40
•
F
remont Fire Station 11
•
Simi V
alley Fire Station 47
•
Cypr
ess Fire Station 17
•
Chino Fir
e Station 7
•
Hesperia Fir
e Station 301
•
Hesperia Fir
e Station 305
•
F
remont Fire Station 2
•
Esc
ondido Fire and Police
•
Indio Fir
e Station 5
•
Cul
ver City Fire Station 3
•
F
remont Fire Station 6
•
Esc
ondido Fire Station 7
•
Esc
ondido Fire Station 6
•
Y
ucaipa Fire Station 3
•
Cabazon Fir
e Station 24
•
Esc
ondido Fire Station 3
•
Carlsbad Fir
e Station 6
•
Hous
ton Fire Station 8
•
San Mar
cos Fire Station 4
•
Lak
e Forest Fire Station 19
•
F
remont Fire Station 8
•
Chino Fir
e Station 63
•
Dana P
oint Fire Station 29
•
F
airbanks Headquarters Fire Station
•
San Mar
cos Fire Station 2
•
R
ancho Cucamonga FS 173
•
San Bernar
dino Fire Station 232
•
Nor
co Fire Station 22
•
Cor
ona Fire Station 7
•
Sant
a Monica Fire Station 2
•
La Quint
a Fire Station 93
•
R
ancho Cucamonga Fire Station 176
•
Anchor
age Headquarters Fire Station 1
•
F
ontana Fire Station 78
•
San Mar
cos Fire Station 1
•
Chino Hills Fir
e Station 62
•
Burbank Fir
e and Police Facility
•
T
emecula Fire Station 84
•
Riv
erside Fire Station 12
•
F
ontana Fire Station 77
•
F
ontana Fire Station 74
Bernhard Wassink LEED AP, Sustainability Coordinator
Mr. Wassink joined WLC Architects
in 2000 as our Sustainable Design
Coordinator. He has been involved in a
variety of projects focusing on project
design, design development and
construction documents. Mr. Wassink
has managed a number of LEED projects
and is responsible for LEED training
within the firm. His knowledge of LEED
is grounded in practical experience that
has given him the ability to accurately
evaluate a project’s potential, establish
sustainability goals, fulfill and document
program requirements, manage other
members of the design team, and guide
a LEED application through the process
until final certification.
EDUCATION
Taylor University Upland, IN
Bachelor of Science, Business Systems,
Concentrations in Finance & Art
California Polytechnic University,
Pomona, CA
Master of Architecture
Concentration Historic Preservation
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
LEED AP
FIRE STATIONS
•
Cos
ta Mesa Fire Station 1
•
Or
ange Fire Station 1
•
Harmony Gr
ove Fire Station 5
•
Anaheim Fir
e Station 5
•
Ne
wport Beach Fire Station 2
•
Mont
erey Park Fire Station 62
•
Eas
tvale Fire Station 31
•
F
ontana Fire Station 73
•
T
ustin Fire Station 37
•
Sender
o Ranch Fire Station 56
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station 81
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station 89
•
Ont
ario Fire Station 9
•
Cabazon Fir
e Station 24
•
Y
ucaipa Fire Station 9
•
Esc
ondido Fire Station 3
•
Esc
ondido Fire Station 6
•
Esc
ondido Fire Station 7
•
Hous
ton Fire Station 1
•
Anaheim Fir
e Station 11
•
San Diego Fir
e Station 45
•
San Mar
cos Fire Station 4
•
Cul
ver City Fire Station 3
•
F
remont Fire Station 6
•
Carlsbad Fir
e Station 6
•
Lak
e Forest Fire Station 19
•
Dana P
oint Fire Station 29
•
F
airbanks Headquarters FS
•
San Mar
cos Fire Station 2
•
Nor
co Fire Station 22
•
La Quint
a Fire Station 93
•
LAX ARFF St
ation No. 80
REFERENCES
Mr. Greg Woolf, Division Chief (R)
San Marcos Fire Department
(760) 594-4705
[email protected]
Mr. Peter Tauscher, Project Manager
City of Newport Beach
(949) 644-3330
[email protected]
Mr. Terry Welsh, Division Chief (R)
San Bernardino County Fire Department
(760) 954-7779
[email protected]
Mr. Nathan Complin, Project Executive
Erickson-Hall Construction Company
(760) 801-4284
[email protected]
Frank Cuomo Senior Associate, Quality Assurance/Cost Coordinator
EDUCATION
University of Illinois, Champaign
School of Architecture, 1983
REGISTRATION
Architect, California - 27449
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Inland Chapter
American Institute of Architects
Mr. Cuomo has been with the firm since
1985 and as Quality Assurance/Cost
Coordinator is not assigned to just one
studio team. Instead, Mr. Cuomo acts as
a resource to the entire office, answering
technical questions, developing WLC's
specification system, and overseeing all
product literature.
Mr. Cuomo is responsible for WLC's
Contract Document Checklist. Each
project team and their consulting
engineers must complete this thorough
checklist before a WLC project is deemed
"ready for bid."
PUBLIC SAFETY
•
Sant
a Clarita Sheriff's Facility
•
San Diego CHP F
acility
•
City of Commer
ce EOC
•
Mont
clair Police Facility
•
Esc
ondido Police and Fire Facility
•
T
urlock Public Safety Facility
•
Y
ucaipa Sheriff Facility
•
Cathedr
al City Fire Station 411
•
Gilr
oy Police Facility
•
Cl
ovis Police and Fire Facility
•
San Mar
cos Training Facility
•
San Mar
cos Sheriff's Facility
MUNICIPAL FACILITIES
•
Mont
clair Youth and Teen Center
•
Y
ucaipa Community Center
•
Gilr
oy Civic Center
•
W
oodbridge Community Park
•
Cor
ona Community Center
•
Y
ucaipa Civic Center
•
City of Cl
ovis Civic Center
REFERENCES
Mr. Michael W. Siemering, Project
Director
Department of General Services
(916) 376-1628
[email protected]
Mr. Scot Smithee, Police Chief (R)
Gilroy Police Department
(408) 846-0310
[email protected]
Mr. Mike Hudson, City Engineer
City of Montclair
(909) 625-9439
[email protected]
Mr. Nathan Complin, Project Executive
Erickson-Hall Construction Company
(760) 801-4284
[email protected]
Thomas Edward Carcelli Principal, civTEC
Tom Carcelli has over 25 years of experience in the civil engineering field with a particular emphasis on parks and recreation, commercial/industrial, education and public works projects. His extensive design and management experience in all phases of civil engineering for land development projects throughout Southern California includes grading, water quality, hydrology, hydraulics, storm drain, water/sewer, survey/mapping and street design.
EDUCATION
California State Polytechnic University,
Pomona
Master of Architecture
University of California, Irvine
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
REGISTRATIONS
Licensed Professional Engineer - CA
RCE #81640
Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) -
C-81640
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
ASCE - Member
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
•
Bac
chus Business Park
•
Mis
sion Viejo Lexus Car Dealership
•
P
oway Mossy Nissan Car Dealership
•
Fir
st American Financial Corporate Headquarters
•
GIA Corpor
ate Headquarters Parking Lot Expansion
•
Bo
wers Museum - Kennedy Wing
•
Sant
a Clarita Central Park
•
Encinit
as Community Park
•
Esencia Sport
s Park
•
Bommer Cany
on Cattle Camp
•
Y
orba Linda Adventure Play Area
•
P
ortola Park
•
J
ARPD Recreation Center
•
Norman P
. Murray Center Expansion
•
Oasis Senior Cent
er
•
Muirlands Boul
evard Median Renovation
•
Ne
xus Twin Towers
•
Hect
or G. Godinez Fundamental High School
•
R
ancho Santiago Community College District Office, ADA Compliance Principal, civTEC
Richard M. Byrd President, R.M. Byrd and Associates
R.M. Byrd and Associates, Inc. was founded in 1992 on fundamental principles designed to provide quality consulting engineering services. The Principals, Associates, and employees of R.M. Byrd and Associates, Inc. recognize that in a service oriented industry, commitment to specific principles provides clear distinction between mediocrity and excellence. The primary dedication of their firm begins with the understanding that they are to protect the interests, property, and safety of the general public. R.M Byrd and Associates maintains the highest level of professional integrity. It is the goal of their firm to obtain creative solutions to difficult problems and strive to implement creativity without sacrificing project economy.
EDUCATION
California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo
Bachelor of Science, Architectural
Engineering, 1984
REGISTRATIONS
CA Civil Engineer No. CE41857
CA Structural Engineer No. SE3350
AK Professional Engineer No. 11952
AZ Professional Engineer No. 29251
CO Professional Engineer No. 34824
FL Professional Engineer No. 53077
GA Professional Engineer No. 26484
IL Professional Engineer No. 062-052532
IN Professional Engineer No. 10000055
MN Professional Engineer No. 40451
NC Professional Engineer No. 024194
TX Professional Engineer No. 84360
VA Professional Engineer No. 0402 035429
WA Professional Engineer No. 33441
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Structural Engineers Association of CA
Consulting Engineers Association of CA
International Conference of Building Officials
American Institute of Steel Construction
Office of Emergency Services - Disaster
Preparedness Program
FIRE STATIONS
•
Cos
ta Mesa Fire Station 1
•
Carlsbad Fir
e Station 6
•
Esc
ondido Police and Fire Facility
•
San Mar
cos Fire Station 4
•
Coll
ege Park Fire Station
•
R
ancho Santa Fe Fire Station
•
R
ancho Cielo Fire Station
•
Indio Fir
e Station 5
•
Upland Fir
e Station
•
Hesperia Fir
e Station 301
•
Hesperia Fir
e Station 305
•
San Mar
cos Fire Station 2
•
Chino Fir
e Station 63
•
Sant
a Monica Fire Station 2
•
San Mar
cos Fire Station 1
•
T
owngate Fire Station
•
Menif
ee Fire Station
•
Winches
ter Fire Station
•
Bermuda Dunes Fir
e Station
•
Lak
eland Village Fire Station
•
Elsinor
e Fire Station
•
Mor
eno Valley Fire Station
•
Mesa Fir
e Station
•
R
edlands Fire Station
•
Cathedr
al City Fire Station 411
•
F
ontana Fire Station 71
•
Rialt
o Fire Station 202
•
Rubidoux Fir
e Station
•
T
emecula Roripaugh Fire Station
ARFF STATIONS
•
LAX - ARFF St
ation 80
TRAINING FACILITIES
•
Dinuba Public Saf
ety Training Facility
•
F
remont Tactical Training Center
•
Chino T
raining Facility
•
R
oy Wilson Training Center
•
Los Angel
es Valley Recruit Training
Center
•
P
oway Fire Training Facility
•
San Mar
cos Emergency Training Facility
REFERENCES
Mr. Dave Atchley
Environmental Systems Research Institute
(951) 538-9921
[email protected]
Mr. Dale Etter
Victor Elementary School District
(760) 245-1691
[email protected]
Mr. Jim Christl
Azusa Pacific University
(626) 815-4591
[email protected]
Tim Pocock Principal, Pocock Design Solutions
Mr. Pocock has over 30 years of experience in the design of a wide variety of project types including educational, institutional, industrial, municipal, parking structures, and healthcare facilities. With a construction oriented background, Mr. Pocock is well versed in all aspects of project delivery.
As managing principal of Pocock Design Solutions, Mr. Pocock is responsible for the overall operations of the company. Mr. Pocock will be involved with all aspects of the project, from the schematic design phase through construction phase and closeout.
EDUCATION
University of California Los Angeles,
Extension
California Sequential Program in
Plumbing System Design
REGISTRATIONS
University of California Los Angeles,
Extension California Sequential Program
in Plumbing System Design Certification
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Plumbing Engineers
National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA)
FIRE STATIONS
•
Cos
ta Mesa Fire Station 1
•
Airport Fir
e Station No. 5
•
Anaheim Fir
e Station No. 11
•
Atw
ater Fire Station No. 2
•
Bonsall Fir
e Station No. 5
•
Butt
erfield Fire Station
•
Carlsbad Fir
e Station No. 6
•
Chino Fir
e Station No. 1
•
Chino Fir
e Station No. 7
•
Chino V
alley Fire Station No. 63
•
Chula Vis
ta Fire Station No. 2
•
Chula Vis
ta Fire Station No. 4
•
City of San Jose Fir
e Station No. 2
•
Cul
ver City Fire Station No. 3
•
Erringer Fir
e Station No. 47
•
Nor
co Fire Station No. 22
•
F
ontana Fire Station No. 78
•
F
remont Fire Station No. 11
•
F
remont Fire Station No. 2
•
F
ullerton Fire Station No. 41
•
Gilr
oy Fire Station No. 3
•
Hollis
ter Fire Station No. 1
•
Mer
ced Fire Station No. 55
•
Nervino Fir
e Station
•
Nor
co Fire Station No. 21
•
Nor
co Fire Station No. 3
•
Ont
ario Fire Station No. 9
•
Ont
ario Fire Station No. 5
•
Or
ange County Fire Station No. 17
REFERENCES
Kasey Shay, Senior Project Manager
Bomel Construction Company, Inc.
(714) 279-3252
[email protected]
Ken Jones Jr., M.O.T. Supervisor
Cucamonga School District
(909) 987-8942
[email protected]
Ronald A. Kuehl, COO
Neff Construction, Inc.
(909) 947-3768
[email protected]
Rolando E. Sotelo Principal, A&F Engineering Group
As a principal of the firm, Mr. Sotelo serves as the Chief Engineer for A&F Engineering Group, Inc. ventures. Mr. Sotelo has over twenty years of experience and has completed projects throughout Southern California. His expertise has been an integral part of large and small projects that include civic centers, educational facilities, medical centers, office buildings, commercial centers and industrial plants.
Institutional projects form a major part of Mr. Sotelo’s experience. These projects include new construction and remodel of fire and police stations; new construction and modernization of high schools, middle schools and elementary schools; building additions and remodel of university and college campuses; and medical facility remodels.
EDUCATION
B.S., Electrical Engineering,
California State University, Long Beach
REGISTRATIONS
California License E17229
Arizona License E48795
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
National Society of Professional Engineers
(NSPE)
California Society of Professional Engineers
(CSPE)
Institute of Electrical and Electronic
Engineers (IEEE)
FIRE STATIONS
•
Cos
ta Mesa Fire Station 1
•
Anaheim Fir
e Station 5
•
Eas
tvale Fire Station 31
•
Ne
wport Beach Fire Station 5
•
Mont
erey Park Fire Station 62
•
Mont
erey Park Fire Station 61
•
F
ontana Fire Station 73
•
F
ontana Fire Station 71
•
Bonsall Fir
e Station 5
•
Carlsbad Fir
e Station 3
•
Ont
ario Fire Station 4
•
Y
ucaipa Fire Station 3
•
Cul
ver City Fire Station 3
•
San Jose Fir
e Station 2
•
A
valon City Hall and Fire Station
•
T
erra Lago Fire Station 5
•
Simi V
alley Fire Station 47
•
F
remont Fire Station 2
•
P
omona Fire Station 183
•
El Cajon Fir
e Station 7
•
Hesperia Fir
e Station 304
•
Anaheim Fir
e Station 8
•
Hesperia Fir
e Station 305
•
Hesperia Fir
e Station 301
•
Chino Fir
e Station 7
•
Chino T
raining Facility
REFERENCES
Steve Stanton, Project Manager
City of Montclair
(909) 625-9444
[email protected]
Eric DeMott, AIA
Haynes + Oakley Architects
(626) 836-5820
[email protected]
Aaron Mayoral, Owner
Fulmin Electrical Corporation
(909) 218-4528
[email protected]
FIRE STATIONS
•
Or
ange Fire Station No. 2
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station No. 4
•
Anaheim Fir
e Station No. 5
•
Esc
ondido Fire Station No. 5
•
Irvine Fir
e Station No. 6
•
Ont
ario Fire Station No. 6
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station No. 7
•
Ont
ario Fire Station No. 7
•
Ont
ario Fire Station No. 8
•
San Diego Fir
e Station No. 14
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station No. 15
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station No. 21
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station No. 33
•
V
an Nuys Fire Station No. 39
•
San Diego Fir
e Station No. 43
•
W
est Los Angeles Fire Station No. 43
•
San Diego Fir
e Station No. 45
•
Studio City Fir
e Station No. 78
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station No. 81
•
San P
edro Fire Station No. 85
•
Northridge Fir
e Station No. 87
•
Los Angel
es Fire Station No. 94
•
Lak
eside FS and Administration
Building
REFERENCES
Ms. Patricia Neely, A.I.A.
Anaheim Union High School District
(714) 999-3505
[email protected]
Ms. Tara Liampetchakul, P.E., Civil
Engineer
Los Angeles Unified School District
(213) 241-0372
[email protected]
Mr. Jimson Gutierrez, Associate Engineer
City of Anaheim-Dept. of Public Works
(714) 765-5251
[email protected]
Don Wilson Principal, Cornerstone Studios
Mr. Wilson is skilled in coordination of multi-disciplinary teams of technical consultants toward completion of project designs. He has over 40 years' experience in the field of landscape architecture and planning and on a variety of projects with extensive experience in design and alteration of new and existing facilities. His responsibilities encompass the initial fieldwork, data gathering, site analysis and documentation, design, and construction observation. He has prepared master plans, visual studies, water conservation studies, and guidelines for parks, schools, and housing communities. He has been responsible for the preparation of landscape architectural designs that emphasize lower maintenance, compatible plant associations, accessibility for all, and re-use of sites and materials.
EDUCATION
University of California, Berkeley, CA
Bachelor of Landscape
CERTIFICATIONS
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
Minority Business Enterprise
Women Business Enterprise
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Licensed Landscape Architect #1746
CLARB Registration
American Society of Landscape Architects
(ASLA), Member
Meghan Gibson Project Manager, Chambers Group
Meghan Gibson has more than ten years of experience providing environmental planning and policy services to public and private clients. She has experience managing both large- and small-scale projects that involved California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents. She is responsible for preparing CEQA documentation, including Initial Studies (ISs), Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs), and Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs). In addition to her CEQA experience, Meghan has prepared multiple joint CEQA/ NEPA documents, again, to both public and private clients.
She also has extensive experience preparing mitigation monitoring summary reports and compiling information from both survey and monitoring data.
EDUCATION
University of Southern California
MPP, Public Policy, Environmental Policy
University of Redlands
BS, Environmental Management
PROFESSIONAL TRAINING
AEP Advanced CEQA Workshop
AEP NEPA Essentials Workshop
RELEVANT PROJECTS
•
Fir
e Station 80, Initial Study/MND,
City of Fontana, CA
•
V
CWD Headquarters Facility, Initial
Study/MND, Valley County Water
District, Baldwin Park, CA
•
Or
ange Fire Station 1, Initial Study/
MND, City of Orange, CA
•
Heml
ock Booster Pump Station,
Initial Study/MND, Eastern
Municipal Water District (EMWD),
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, CA
•
Rinc
on (formerly Golden Triangle)
Development Project Initial Study/
MND, Chino Hills, CA
•
Hampshir
e Road Pipeline, California
Water Service, Thousand Oaks, CA
•
RD/HR T
ransmission Line Initial
Study, California Water Service,
Redondo Beach, CA
•
St
ation 27 Beresford Tanks-CEQA
Services, Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works, Los
Angeles County, CA
•
ELA St
ation 12 Reservoir 4A Tank
Project, Initial Study, Commerce,
Los Angeles County, CA
REFERENCES
Mr. Micael Hofflinger, Senior Planner
City of Chino Hills
(909) 364-2777
[email protected]
Mr. Dale Gonzales, Director of
Environmental Affairs
California Water Service Company
(408) 367-8324
[email protected]
Mr. Timotheus Hampton, Senior Water
Resources Engineer
City of Pomona
(909) 802-7420
[email protected]
Jason D. Hertzberg Principal Engineer, Leighton Consulting Mr. Hertzberg has 18 years of experience in various areas of roadway, transportation, public works, water, wastewater, and residential developments throughout the High Desert and other areas of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. He has performed geotechnical investigations from the most preliminary stages through site investigation, laboratory testing, data analysis, and report preparation for various types of civil facilities, including large-scale public works, roadways, transportation, commercial, and industrial developments. Mr. Hertzberg’s areas of expertise include seismic and liquefaction hazards analysis, foundation design, soil reinforcement, slope stability analysis, and the use of computer applications for geotechnical engineering.
His experience provides a comprehensive understanding of the design and construction process, and the civil and geotechnical aspects of projects related to infrastructure, and public facilities. Mr. Hertzberg has worked in collaboration with design teams, and understands the necessity of the working relationship to meet the project’s goals. Jason manages engineering staff and is responsible for review of geotechnical engineering analyses, laboratory testing, and quality control.
He is practiced in geotechnical site investigations, shallow and deep foundation design, buttress and structural landslide mitigation, seismic hazard evaluations and mitigation design, grading control, ground improvement, pavement design, and forensic evaluations.
EDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering, with
specialization in Geotechnical
Engineering, California State University,
Long Beach, 2004
B.S., Civil Engineering, California State
Polytechnic University, Pomona, 1997
REGISTRATIONS
California Registered Geotechnical
Engineer – 2711
California Registered Civil Engineer –
61778
FIRE STATIONS
•
Cos
ta Mesa Fire Station 1
•
City of Indus
try East End Fire Station
•
R
ancho Cucamonga Fire Station 172
•
F
ullerton Fire Station 7
•
Chino Fir
e Station 63
•
F
ontana Fire Station 71
•
T
emescal Public Safety Facility
•
V
erdemont Fire Station
•
Needl
es Fire Station No. 31
•
Ont
ario Fire Station 9
•
Gr
and Crossing Fire Station
•
Or
ange Fire Station 2
•
Or
ange Fire Station 1
•
Manhatt
an Beach Fire Station 2
•
Ne
wport Beach Fire Station 2
•
Mont
erey Park Fire Station 62
•
Ne
wport Beach Fire Station 5
Eric R. Shamp Principal, Ecotype Consulting
Eric is the principal and founder of Ecotype Consulting. He is a licensed architect, and has dedicated his career to the practice of sustainable design and development for the past fifteen years. He founded Ecotype Consulting to respond to the ever-increasing demand for green building consulting, green and energy code compliance, and commissioning in California.
Eric provides organizations with the unique expertise necessary to plan, design, build, certify, and occupy environmentally responsible and energy efficient green buildings. His prime directive is to optimize the communication effort between project stakeholders, ensure adherence to project sustainability goals, and take responsibility for the necessary calculations, documentation, and technical analyses that can often distract the project team from their critical tasks.
EDUCATION
Rice University
Bachelor of Architecture/Art History
LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS
California Architect C29013, since 2003
Accredited Lighting Acceptance Test
Technician TC-A814192
National Council of Architectural
Registration Boards (NCARB)
ASHRAE-certified Commissioning Process
Management Professional (CPMP)
LEED Accredited Professional BD+C, since
2003
Member, American Institute of Architects
(AIA)
Member, US Green Building Council
Member, ASHRAE
Member, Construction Specifications
Institute (CSI)
Member, California Association of Building
Energy Consultants (CABEC)
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
San Bernardino County Joshua Tree Office Building (Bob Burke Government Center)
This facility houses county services and a sheriff’s office for the community of Joshua Tree, just outside the entrance to Joshua Tree National Park. The project features a 157 kW photovoltaic array that offsets approximately 70% of the building’s energy consumption. Ecotype provided LEED consulting, energy modeling, and limited commissioning services.
Inland Empire Transportation Management Center
The IETMC houses CalTrans and California Highway Patrol operations, and provides intermodal, interregional, interagency traffic management in the Inland Empire. The facility is base-isolated, and is designed to comply with the Essential Services Act.
Ecotype Consulting worked with RC Construction Services to coordinate, track, and document LEED compliance during construction.
Norco Operations Center
The Norco Operations Center was part of the RCCD Measure C bond measure, and was designed and built to consolidate maintenance and operations facilities, network operations, and warehousing into one building. The design process included early-phase full-team design workshops, in which sustainability goals were determined, design solutions and alternates were proposed, and systems were integrated.
East Campus Central Utilities Plant
The UC San Diego Medical Center is constructing a new nine-story Bed Tower connected to its existing Thornton Hospital in La Jolla, CA. The central utilities plant, formerly located in the basement of Thornton, had to be relocated to make way for the new configuration, and to be expanded to serve the entire East Campus.
Ming Guan Senior Engineer, KOA
Ms. Guan has 11 years of experience with work in civil, traffic and highway design.
Ms. Guan is an integral part of many KOA projects which have involved traffic engineering design for roadway improvements, traffic signal designs, ramp metering, signing and striping, and traffic control plans. She has completed a number of roadway and traffic signal design projects for a number of agencies. She has hands-on experience in completing PS&E packages. She is also an adjunct professor at Cal Poly Pomona teaching Computer Programing, Traffic Engineer, Highway Engineering and Advanced Highway Engineering for the Civil Engineering Department since 2008.
EDUCATION
Cal State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Master of Science in Civil Engineering
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer, Civil, CA#75793
Professional Engineer, Traffic, CA#2795
FIRE STATIONS
•
Cos
ta Mesa Fire Station 1
•
San Diego Fir
e Station 45
•
North V
alley Fire Station 7
•
Bonsall Fir
e Station 5
•
V
an Nuys Fire Station 39
•
Eas
tvale Fire Station 2
•
La Quint
a Fire Station
•
Thousand P
alms Fire Station
•
R
ancho Cucamonga FS 5
MUNICIPAL
•
I-10 On-R
amp Improvements,
Colton
•
I-215 T
raffic Signal, San Bernardino
•
T
raffic Signal System, Redlands
•
T
raffic Signal and Interconnect
Design, Rancho Cucamonga
•
T
raffic Signals and Street
Improvement, Fontana
REFERENCES
Victor Ortiz, City Engineer
City of Colton
(909) 370-5065
[email protected]
Noel Castillo, Engineering Manager
City of Fontana
(909) 350-7632
[email protected]
Azzam Jabsheh, Associate Engineer
City of Rialto
(909) 820-2525
[email protected]
Mahmoud Khodr, Traffic Engineer
City of San Bernardino
(909) 384-7251
[email protected]
K. Anthony Hoover Principal, MCH
Mr. Hoover brings over thirty-six years of experience and has served as principal acoustical consultant on over 1,900 projects involving all building types in all areas of architectural acoustics, noise and vibration control, sound system design, HVAC and environmental noise control. He is experienced with a broad range of federal and civic administrative facilties. He serves as a working committee member on the ANSI’s Classroom Acoustics Standard, and among his peers, he is recognized as one of the key leaders in the industry.
EDUCATION
M.S. Acoustics, Pennsylvania State
University, 1981
B.A. American Studies,
University of Notre Dame, 1976
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Nat’l Council of Acoustical
Consultants: President, Board of
Directors
Acoustical Society of America:
Fellow (elected 2003), Chairman-
Technical Committee on
Architectural Acoustics (2001-2004),
Chairman-College of Fellows
Institute of Noise Control
Engineering: Member
(1982-present), Board Certified
Audio Engineering Society: Member
Greater Boston/ASA: Chairman
Los Angeles/ASA: Board of Directors
Boston Architectural Center: Adjunct
Faculty and Thesis Advisor
American Federation of Teachers:
Member Berklee College of Music:
Assistant Professor
HIGHLIGHTED EXPERIENCE
•
Coachella W
ater Dist. Admin. Facility, Palm Desert, CA
•
El Mont
e Transit Station, El Monte, CA
•
Go
v. Deukmejian Superior Courthouse, Long Beach, CA
•
Sacr
amento Convention Center Renovation, Peer Review, CA
•
C
A Military Consolidated Headquarters/EOC Center, Sacramento, CA •
Kaiser P
ermanente, Medical Building, Ventura, CA
•
Maric
opa County Court Tower, Phoenix, AZ
•
John Adams Courthouse, Bos
ton, MA
•
Pima County Joint Court
s Complex, Tucson, AZ
•
Donohue F
ederal Building & US Courthouse, Worcester, MA
•
Ol
d San Juan Courthouse & Post Office, San Juan, Puerto Rico •
US Dis
trict Courthouse Renovation, Providence, RI
•
F
enton Judicial Center, Lowell, MA
•
Geor
ge C. Young US Courthouse & Annex, Orlando, FL
•
Salt Riv
er Pima- Maricopa Indian Tribal Court Facility, Scottsdale, AZ •
Bose Corpor
ate World Headquarters, Framingham, MA
•
EMC Briefing Cent
er, Hopkinton, MA
•
As
tra Pharmaceuticals Teleconference Rooms, Worcester, MA •
Ophthalmol
ogic Microscope Relocation, Portland, ME
•
Mas
sachusetts General Hospital, Wellman Research Center, Boston, MA •
Ne
wton-Wellesley Hospital, MRI Center, Newton, MA
•
MIT
, Health Services Building, Cambridge, MA
•
Rhode Island Bl
ood Center, Providence, RI
•
Ballis
tic Test Laboratories, Watertown, MA
References
The following are some specific references for our firm. PBK-WLC takes great pride in not only the facilities we help create but the relationships that develop with many County, City, Fire, and Law Enforcement representatives.
ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY
Mr. Steve Chambers, Property Manager (R)
Orange County Fire Authority
Phone: (714) 720-4499
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Chris DeCoursey, Construction Mgr.
Orange County Fire Authority
Phone: (714) 573-6473
Email: [email protected]
SAN MARCOS FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Brett Van Wey, Fire Chief (R)
San Marcos Fire Department
Phone: (760) 594-4700
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Todd Newman, Fire Chief (R)
San Marcos Fire Department
Phone: (760) 594-4704
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Greg Woolf, Division Chief (R)
San Marcos Fire Department
Phone: (760) 594-4705
Email: [email protected]
CHINO VALLEY FIRE DISTRICT
Mr. Luke Nurre, Fire Fighter (R)
Chino Valley Independent Fire District
Phone: (909) 907-0166
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Scott Atkinson, Deputy Chief (R)
Chino Valley Fire District
Phone: (909) 816-7682
[email protected]
FREMONT FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Mike Avila, Fire Captain (R)
Fremont Fire Department
Phone: (925) 683-1802
Email: [email protected]
POWAY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Jon Canavan, Fire Chief (R)
Poway Fire Department
Phone: (858) 735-4925
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
Ms. Joyce Masterson, Asst. City Manager (R)
City of Escondido
Phone: (760) 715-8407
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Mr. Terry L. Smith, Senior Civil Engineer (R)
City of Carlsbad
Phone: (760) 613-8205
Email: [email protected]
CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Chris Lawrence, Captain (R)
Carlsbad Fire Department
Phone: (760) 415-4679
Email: [email protected]
ONTARIO FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Michael Pelletier, Deputy Chief (R)
Ontario Fire Department
Phone: (909) 229-3333
Email: [email protected]
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE
Mr. Terry Welsh, Division Chief (R)
San Bernardino County Fire Department
Phone: (760) 954-7779
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Bryant O'Hara, Battalion Chief
San Bernardino County Fire Department
Phone: (909) 387-5974
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF CHINO
Mr. Michael A. Kolling, Project Manager (R)
City of Chino
Phone: (909) 664-6220
Email: [email protected]
Ms. Carolyn Baltzer, Project Manager
City of Chino
Phone: (909) 627-7577
Email: [email protected]
MURRIETA FIRE & RESCUE
Mr. Mike Lopez, Deputy Fire Chief
Murrieta Fire & Rescue
Phone: (760) 212-2569
Email: [email protected]
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Ms. Anna E. Rodriguez, Project Manager
County of Riverside, EDA
Phone: (760) 863-2537
Email: [email protected]
Ms. Leah Rodriguez, Project Manager
County of Riverside, EDA
Phone: (760) 863-2534
Email: [email protected]
NORTH COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DIST.
Mr. Steve Marovich, Battalion Commander (R)
North County Fire Protection District
Phone: (760) 497-2215
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF FONTANA
Ms. Kimberly Young, Senior Civil Engineer
City of Fontana
Phone: (909) 350-7600
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Weldon Babino, Project Manager (R)
City of Fontana
Phone: (909) 855-6201
Email: [email protected]
LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS
Mr. Robert Falcon, Chief Airports Engineer
Facilities Management Program
Phone: (424) 646-5973
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF MONTCLAIR
Mr. Noel Castillo, Public Works Director
City of Montclair
Phone: (909) 626-8571
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF LA VERNE
Mr. Chad Peterson, Recreation Coordinator
City of La Verne
Phone: (909) 596-8700
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF COSTA MESA
Mr. Arash Rahimian, Associate Engineer
City of Costa Mesa
Phone: (714) 754-5069
Email: [email protected]
ANAHEIM FIRE & RESCUE
Mr. Mike Molloy, Deputy Chief
Anaheim Fire & Rescue
Phone: (714) 900-0769
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Mr. Curt Klafta, Battalion Chief (R)
Los Angeles Fire Department
Phone: (805) 300-3256
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF PASADENA
Mr. Dale Torstenbo, Project Manager (R)
City of Pasadena
Phone: (626) 484-5640
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF HESPERIA
Mr. David R. Burkett, Project Manager
City of Hesperia
Phone: (760) 947-1202
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
Ms. Rowaida Jadan, Project Manager
City of San Diego
Phone: (619) 533-6655
Email: [email protected]
SAN DIEGO FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Kevin Ester, Assistant Fire Chief
San Diego Fire-Rescue Department
Phone: (858) 573-1359
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
Mr. Paul Malone, City Manager (R)
City of San Marcos
Phone: (760) 802-2487
Email: [email protected]
MONTEREY PARK FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Matthew Hallock, Fire Chief
Monterey Park Fire Department
Phone: (626) 476-2226
Email: [email protected]
SANTA MONICA FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Jim Hone, Fire Chief (R)
Santa Monica Fire Department
Phone: (310) 749-3523
Email: [email protected]
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
Mr. Michael Siemering, Project Director
Department of General Services
Phone: (916) 376-5000
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH
Mr. Mamerto Estepa, Associate Engineer (R)
City of Manhattan Beach
Phone: (805) 407-6352
Email: [email protected]
MANHATTAN BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Mike Boyd, Battalion Chief (R)
Manhattan Beach Fire Department
Phone: (714) 318-9811
Email: [email protected]
ORANGE CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Robert Stefano, Deputy Chief
Orange City Fire Department
Phone: (949) 533-2049
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Matt Nelson, Administrative Captain
Orange City Fire Department
Phone: (714) 388-2500
Email: [email protected]
NEWPORT BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Jim Boland, Captain
Newport Beach Fire Department
Phone: (714) 915-4896
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Mr. Mark Vukojevic, Public Works Director
City of Newport Beach
Phone: (949) 644-3319
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Peter Tauscher, Project Engineer
City of Newport Beach
Phone: (949) 644-3316
Email: [email protected]
COSTA MESA FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Tim Vasin, Battalion Chief
Costa Mesa Fire Department
Phone: (714) 754-5204
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Jason Pyle, Division Chief
Costa Mesa Fire Department
Phone: (714) 754-5069
Email: [email protected]
FOUNTAIN VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Ron Cookston, Battalion Chief
Fountain Valley Fire Department
Phone: (714) 593-4549
Email: [email protected]
HUNTINGTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Scott Haberle, Fire Chief
Huntington Beach Fire Department
Phone: (626) 705-4095
Email: [email protected]
VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
Mr. Jose Martinez, General Manager
Valley County Water District
Phone: (909) 973-9553
Email: [email protected]
USGVM WATER DISTRICT
Mr. Tom Love, General Manager
USGVM Water District
Phone: (626) 443-2297
Email: [email protected]
CITY OF ONTARIO
Mr. Dan Beers, Project Manager
City of Ontario
Phone: (909) 395-2806
Email: [email protected]
BIG BEAR LAKE WATER DISTRICT
Mr. Reggie Lamson, General Manager
City of Big Bear Lake
Phone: (909) 866-5050
Email: [email protected]
CONTRACTORS
Mr. Nathan Complin, Project Executive
Erickson-Hall Construction Co.
Phone: (760) 801-4284
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Robert Kelley
Keeton Construction
Phone: (951) 970-0776
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Michael Villegas, Vice President
SafeworkCM
Phone: (909) 361-8533
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Jon Wollam, Construction Manager
RC Construction Services
Phone: (909) 772-2654
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Bryan Aylor, Director of Construction
TELACU Construction Management
Phone: (714) 541-2390
Email: [email protected]
Section Tab 2: Project
T eam and Experience
WHY WLC?
“WLC was a fantastic firm to work with. They listened to every word I had to say and delivered the perfect design on the first try - which was exactly what I was looking for.”
Curt Klafta, Battalion Chief
Fire Station 39 - Van Nuys
Los Angeles Fire Department
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
8163 Rochester Avenue, Suite 100
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
909.987.0909
ORANGE COUNTY
600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1375
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
949.548.5000
SAN DIEGO
11455 El Camino Real, Suite 480
San Diego, CA 92130
619.695.0400
SAN LUIS OBISPO
1327 Archer Street, Suite 110
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
805.329.3076
VENTURA COUNTY
2751 Park View Court, Suite 251
Oxnard, CA 93036
805.947.3200
BERKELEY
2600 Tenth Street, Suite 700
Berkeley, CA 94710
510.450.1999
FOLSOM
1110 Iron Point Road, Suite 200
Folsom, CA 95630
916.355.9922
FRESNO
7790 North Palm Avenue, Suite 300
Fresno, CA 93711
559.448.8400
SACRAMENTO
2520 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 440
Sacramento, CA 95833
916.682.9494
EXHIBIT C FEE SCHEDULE
January 31, 2022
Mr. Arash Rahimian, PE
Senior Engineer
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200
Re: Revised Fee Proposal
Costa Mesa Fire Station 2
Project W2109300AR.06
Dear Mr. Rahimian:
Thank you for selecting PBK-WLC for the design of Fire Station 2. We are very excited about working with both the City and Fire Department again. Attached please find our Revised Fee Proposal. I believe it covers all of the items discussed at our meeting last week.
Mr. Rahimian, thank you again for this opportunity. If you should have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at any time.
Very truly yours,
KELLEY NEEDHAM, AIA
Managing Partner
KN:br/P0W2109300ARx1-ltr
Attachment: Revised Fee Proposal
Revised Fee Proposal
Your contract with PBK-WLC will mark a purposeful investment in your facilities. We are here to make sure that you consider that investment to be a good one, with significant returns. PBK-WLC is extremely flexible when it comes to the fee structure that best suits each new commission. We want the City and Fire Department to feel that you are getting both a quality architectural product and excellent professional services at a fair market price.
In an effort to better define our fee proposal, we have broken it down into the following components:
A. Basic Architectural Fee
B. Project Specific Fees
C. Total Fee
D. Reimbursables
E. Items Excluded
F. Hourly Rate Schedule
A description of each component is as follows:
A. BASIC ARCHITECTURAL FEE
Our fee for basic architectural services will be a fixed lump sum and includes the following disciplines:
• Civil Engineering
•A r c h i t e c t u r a l D e s i g n
• Structural Engineering
• Mechanical Engineering
• Electrical Engineering
• Landscape Architecture
Our fee includes all building and site improvements, circulation areas, parking areas, and landscaping. For the purposes of establishing a fee, we have assumed a project with a preliminary construction budget of $6,500,000.00.
PHASE OF SERVICE FEE
Schematic Design $ 73,125.00
Design Development 48,750.00
Construction Documents 243,750.00
Bidding 24,375.00
Construction Administration 97,500.00
TOTAL BASIC ARCHITECTURAL FEE $ 487,500.00
Costa Mesa Fire Station 2 Page 1
B. PROJECT SPECIFIC FEES
The following items are unique to each project and not typically found in the basic scope of architectural services. Based on our experience and interpretation of the information available, we believe the following services will also be required:
TASK
Topographical Survey $ 10,000.00
Geotechnical Investigation 14,000.00
Traffic Engineering 24,000.00
LEED Certification 59,000.00
Fundamental Commissioning 16,000.00
Hazardous Material Survey 2,500.00
SWPPP 3,000.00
Constructability Review 5,000.00
Utility Survey 5,000.00
Soil Remediation 24,000.00
Acoustical Analysis 10,000.00
Site Wall Design 5,000.00
Sound Barrier Design 5,000.00
Reimbursable Allowance for Agency Permit Fees 50,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT SPECIFIC FEE $ 232,500.00
C. TOTAL FEE
The following is the total of all fees along with an allowance for reimbursables:
SERVICE
Basic Architectural Fee $ 487,500.00
Project Specific Fees 232,500.00
Reimbursable Allowance 10,000.00
TOTAL FEE $ 730,000.00
Costa Mesa Fire Station 2 Page 2
D. REIMBURSABLES
Items required or requested by the City, Fire Department, or approving agency will be invoiced as reimbursable without markup on monthly intervals. Reimbursables generally include the following:
1. Bulk paper copy.
2. Printing/Mylars.
3. Express or overnight mail/courier service.
4. Agency permit fees.
The City will not incur any cost for travel, travel time, phone calls, faxes, or incidental printing or copying.
E. ITEMS EXCLUDED
The following is a list of items which are excluded from our scope of services or are not anticipated to be required. However, these services can be included, if requested, or once additional information is known:
1. Plan Check/Permit Fees.
2. Professionally Constructed Building Models.
3. Energy Modeling.
4. Shoring Design.
5. Arborist/Biologist Reports.
6. Construction Surveying/Staking.
7. Cone Penetration Testing.
8. QSP services during construction.
9. QSD services during construction.
10. Radius maps, mailing lists and public hearing signage.
11. Traffic control plans.
12. County, State, Title Company and Utility Purveyor Fees.
13. Soil Management or Agronomy Reports.
14. Services related to an Underground Parking Structure.
15. Preparation of a Record of Survey map or corner record as required by the City or County.
16. Services related to the undergrounding of overhead utility lines, or the relocation/replacement of poles, along the street or alley frontages.
17. Foundation System: Our fee assumes typical spre ad footings in average soil conditions. Any other type of foundation system required as a result of poor soil conditions would not be considered within our scope of work.
18. Separate street improvement drawings.
19. Environmental documentation or studies.
Costa Mesa Fire Station 2 Page 3
F. HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
For additional services, the following hourly rate s are proposed for the basis of negotiating scope modifications which may be necessary for the project. Hourly rates include mark-up that will be applied to all fees. Reimbursable costs for reprographic services, computer plotting, and printing will be negotiated at the time additional services are requested.
ARCHITECT
Principals of Firm $255.00
Associate/Director/Coordinator $225.00
Senior Project Architect/Manager $205.00
Project Architect/Manager $175.00
Design Studio $125.00
Clerical $105.00
CIVIL ENGINEER
Principal $185.00
Project Manager $150.00
Project Surveyor $120.00
Design Engineer $100.00
Draftsperson $ 75.00
Project Assistant $ 60.00
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
Principal Engineer $175.00
Project Engineer $150.00
Chief Draftsman $110.00
Draftsman $ 90.00
Technical Support $ 75.00
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
Principal $175.00
Project Manager $135.00
Project Engineer $125.00
Designer $ 95.00
Designer/CADD Technician $ 90.00
Jr. Designer/CADD Technician $ 80.00
CADD Technician/Drafter $ 70.00
Technical Support $ 50.00
MECHANICAL ENGINEER
Principal $225.00
Associate Principal $205.00
Senior Project Manager $195.00
Project Manager $185.00
Senior Project Engineer $170.00
Project Engineer $150.00
Senior Design Engineer $135.00
Design Engineer $125.00
Senior Designer $115.00
Designer $105.00
CADD Designer $100.00
CADD Technician $ 80.00
Administrative $ 75.00
Technical Support $ 65.00
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Principal Architect $165.00
Associate Architect $140.00
Architect/Project Manager $125.00
Job Captain/Designer $110.00
CADD Technician $ 95.00
Draftsperson $ 80.00
Technical Support $ 65.00
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
Senior Director $225.00
Program Manager $200.00
Senior Project Manager $165.00
Project Manager $140.00
Project Assistant $ 82.00
Technical Support $ 62.00
TRAFFIC ENGINEER
Principal $248.00
Senior Engineer $198.00
Senior Associate Engineer $137.00
Associate Engineer $110.00
Technical Support $ 94.00
Costa Mesa Fire Station 2 Page 4
EXHIBIT D CITY COUNCIL POLICY 100-5
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY
BACKGROUND Under the Federal Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, passed as part of omnibus drug legislation enacted November 18, 1988, contractors and grantees of Federal funds must certify that they will provide drug-free workplaces. At the present time, the City of Costa Mesa, as a sub-grantee of Federal funds under a variety of programs, is required to abide by this Act. The City Council has expressed its support of the national effort to eradicate drug abuse through the creation of a Substance Abuse Committee, institution of a City-wide D.A.R.E. program in all local schools and other activities in support of a drug-free community. This policy is intended to extend that effort to contractors and grantees of the City of Costa Mesa in the elimination of dangerous drugs in the workplace. PURPOSE It is the purpose of this Policy to: 1. Clearly state the City of Costa Mesa’s commitment to a drug-free society. 2. Set forth guidelines to ensure that public, private, and nonprofit organizations receiving funds from the City of Costa Mesa share the commitment to a drug-free workplace. POLICY The City Manager, under direction by the City Council, shall take the necessary steps to see that the following provisions are included in all contracts and agreements entered into by the City of Costa Mesa involving the disbursement of funds. 1. Contractor or Sub-grantee hereby certifies that it will provide a drug-free workplace by: A. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in Contractor’s and/or sub-grantee’s workplace, specifically the job site or location included in this contract, and specifying the actions that will be taken against the employees for violation of such prohibition; B. Establishing a Drug-Free Awareness Program to inform employees about:
SUBJECT DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY NUMBER 100-5 EFFECTIVE DATE 8-8-89 PAGE 1 of 3
SUBJECT DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY NUMBER 100-5 EFFECTIVE DATE 8-8-89 PAGE 2 of 3 1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; 2. Contractor’s and/or sub-grantee’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; 3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs; and 4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; C. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the contract be given a copy of the statement required by subparagraph A; D. Notifying the employee in the statement required by subparagraph 1 A that, as a condition of employment under the contract, the employee will: 1. Abide by the terms of the statement; and 2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction; E. Notifying the City of Costa Mesa within ten (10) days after receiving notice under subparagraph 1 D 2 from an employee or otherwise receiving the actual notice of such conviction; F. Taking one of the following actions within thirty (30) days of receiving notice under subparagraph 1 D 2 with respect to an employee who is so convicted: 1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination; or 2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health agency, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
SUBJECT DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY NUMBER 100-5 EFFECTIVE DATE 8-8-89 PAGE 3 of 3 G. Making a good faith effort to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of subparagraphs 1 A through 1 F, inclusive. 2. Contractor and/or sub-grantee shall be deemed to be in violation of this Policy if the City of Costa Mesa determines that: a. Contractor and/or sub-grantee has made a false certification under paragraph 1 above; b. Contractor and/or sub-grantee has violated the certification by failing to carry out the requirements of subparagraphs 1 A through 1 G above; c. Such number of employees of Contractor and/or sub-grantee have been convicted of violations of criminal drug statutes for violations occurring in the workplace as to indicate that the contractor and/or sub-grantee has failed to make a good faith effort to provide a drug-free workplace. 3. Should any contractor and/or sub-grantee be deemed to be in violation of this Policy pursuant to the provisions of 2 A, B, and C, a suspension, termination or debarment proceeding subject to applicable Federal, State, and local laws shall be conducted. Upon issuance of any final decision under this section requiring debarment of a contractor and/or sub-grantee, the contractor and/or sub-grantee shall be ineligible for award of any contract, agreement or grant from the City of Costa Mesa for a period specified in the decision, not to exceed five (5) years. Upon issuance of any final decision recommending against debarment of the contractor and/or sub-grantee, the contractor and/or sub-grantee shall be eligible for compensation as provided by law.