Agenda packet — Costa Mesa City Council, November 15, 2022 (part 7 of 8)

City 13929
1705
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-93 ( e ) 600
20-12 (ii), 13-323, 13-26, 13-93 ( e ) 600
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-93 ( e ) 600
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-93 ( e ) 600
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 400
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 600
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 600
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 ( e ), 20-12 (ii) 1650
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 ( e ) 1650
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-311, 20-12(ii), 13-26 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 13-200.88,13-311,20-12 600
13-26,13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 600
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 1500

Page 6 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13930
1706

CITATION ISSUE DATE VIOLATION
ADDRESS STREET NO. CITE NO. (LAST) FIRST NAME
109 06/22/18 Hudson Avenue 783 40548 Shinder Darryl
110 06/15/18 Hudson Avenue 783 40543 Shinder Darryl
111 06/15/18 Hudson Avenue 783 40542 Norwood Kenneth
112 06/07/18 Hudson Avenue 783 40540 Shinder Darryl
113 06/07/18 Hudson Avenue 783 40541 Norwood Kenneth
114 11/29/18 Jeffrey Drive 3018 40507 Investments LLC SSMS 115 11/29/18 Jeffrey Drive 3016 40504 Services Inc National Theraputic 116 11/29/18 Jeffrey Drive 3016 40505 Services Inc National Theraputic 117 11/29/18 Jeffrey Drive 3018 40506 Services Inc National Theraputic 118 11/21/18 Jeffrey Drive 3016 40497 n/a National Therapeutic Services 119 11/21/18 Jeffrey Drive 3016 40498 n/a National Therapeutic Services 120 11/21/18 Jeffrey Drive 3018 40500 n/a National Therapeutic Services 121 11/21/18 Jeffrey Drive 3018 40501 n/a S5MS Investments LLC 122 11/13/18 Jeffrey Drive 3016 40488 n/a National Therapeutic Services 123 11/13/18 Jeffrey Drive 3016 40489 n/a National Therapeutic Services 124 11/13/18 Jeffrey Drive 3018 40490 n/a National Therapeutic Services 125 11/13/18 Jeffrey Drive 3018 40491 n/a S5MS Investments LLC 126 01/18/18 Joann 647 42405 Perlin Richard
127 01/18/18 Joann 653 42408 Perlin Richard
128 01/18/18 Joann 647 42404 Stump Brandon
129 01/18/18 Joann 653 42407 Stump Brandon
130 09/23/16 Joann 594 42081 Benton Earl
131 02/08/18 Joann Street 647 40938 Stump Brandon
132 02/08/18 Joann Street 647 40939 Perlin Richard
133 02/08/18 Joann Street 653 40940 Stump Brandon
134 02/08/18 Joann Street 653 40941 Perlin Richard
135 01/29/18 Joann Street 647 40929 Stump Brandon
136 01/29/18 Joann Street 647 40930 Perlin Richard
137 01/29/18 Joann Street 653 40931 Stump Brandon
138 01/29/18 Joann Street 653 40933 Perlin Richard
139 09/06/16 Johnson 3063 41555 Peacock Nancy
140 11/29/18 Knox Street 268 40502 Recovery LLC Raw
141 11/29/18 Knox Street 268 40503 Douglas L Trust Allenthrop 142 11/21/18 Knox Street 268 40495 n/a Raw Recivery LLC 143 11/21/18 Knox Street 268 40496 n/a Allenthrop Douglas L Trust 144 11/13/18 Knox Street 268 40492 n/a Raw Recovery LLC 145 11/13/18 Knox Street 268 40493 n/a Allenthrop Douglas L Trust

Page 7 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13931
1707
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 1500
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-311 900
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-311 900
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-311 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 1,500.00
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 1,500.00
20-12(ii) 13-323-13-26 1,500.00
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 1,500.00
20-12(ii), 13-323, 13-26 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 450
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 450
13-311, 13-36, 20-12(ii) 450
13-311, 13-36, 20-12(ii) 450
13-311, 13-36, 20-12(ii) 450
13-311, 13-36, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 150
13-311, 13-36, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 9-372 150
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 1,500.00
13-323, 13-26-20-12 (ii) 1,500.00
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 450
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450

Page 8 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13932
1708

CITATION ISSUE DATE VIOLATION
ADDRESS STREET NO. CITE NO. (LAST) FIRST NAME
146 01/25/18 La Salle 2829 40928 Oded Ben-Ezer
147 05/19/16 La Salle 2829 41336 Riley Sheldon
148 05/19/16 La Salle 2829 41337 Family Trust Ben Ezer
149 07/21/16 La Salle 2876 42035 Arellana Margarita
150 02/16/18 Marseilles Way 2450 40040 n/a Lotus Place Recovery LLC 151 02/16/18 Marseilles Way 2450 40041 Ulanovsky Mark D. 152 05/10/18 Mckinley Way 3124 40527 n/a Playa House, Inc. 153 05/10/18 Mckinley Way 2124 40526 n/a Martin Stefani/Martin Tom 154 04/16/18 Mendoza Drive 2869 40961 n/a Clean Path Recovery LLC 155 04/15/18 Mendoza Drive 2869 40962 n/a Lucy Lee Holdings LLC 156 03/12/18 Mendoza Drive 2869 40107 n/a Lucy Lee Holdings, LLC 157 03/12/18 Mendoza Drive 2869 40106 n/a Clean Path Recovery, LLC 158 02/05/18 Mendoza Drive 2869 40935 Heiligman Lee
159 02/05/18 Mendoza Drive 2869 40936 Lucy Lee Holdings LLC 160 07/27/16 Monte Vista 298 41667 Scholten Hendrik
161 02/01/19 Olympic Ave. 13741 40701 Nicolau Kevin & Tiffany 162 02/01/19 Olympic Avenue 13741 40700 N/A REMY OC LLC 163 09/05/18 Oranage Avenue 1509 40692 n/a Nexgen Management LLC 164 08/14/18 Oranage Avenue 1509 41706 n/a Hotel California by the Sea LLC 165 06/29/16 Orange 2412 41961 Maurer Wendy
166 07/11/16 Orange 2558 41967 Saywitz Barry
167 07/12/16 Orange 2558 41971 Lodges Inc. The
168 07/13/16 Orange 1513 42080 by the Sea LLC Hotel California 169 07/15/16 Orange 1775 42032 Recovery LLC Morningside 170 07/18/16 Orange 1897 42033 Zumwalt Richard & Nanette 171 07/18/16 Orange 1897 42034 Center Lead Recovery
172 08/09/16 Orange 2412 40575 Giddings Mark & Christy
173 08/09/16 Orange 2412 40576 Maurer Wendy
174 08/19/16 Orange 2558 40583 Saywitz Barry
175 08/19/16 Orange 2558 40584 LLC Morningside Recovery 176 09/07/16 Orange 2558 40591 Saywitz Barry
177 10/13/16 Orange 2558 40596 LLC Morningside Recovery 178 10/14/16 Orange 2558 40597 LLC Morningside Recovery 179 11/01/16 Orange 2558 40602 LLC Morningside Recovery 180 10/11/17 Orange Ave. 1509 40054 Mangement LLC NexGen 181 10/11/17 Orange Ave. 1509 40056 By the Sea Hotel California 182 11/01/18 Orange Avenue 2417 41693 n/a Northbound Treatment Services

Page 9 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13933
1709
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26,13-200.88, 13-323, 9-372, 20-12 600
12-26, 13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 600
13-26, 20-12(ii), 9-372, 20-12(hh) 150
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, CBC 105.1 2000
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, CBC 105.1 2000
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 750
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 750
13-26, 9-372 150
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-311 450.00
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-311 450.00
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 1500
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-323 900
13-26, 13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 1200
13-26, 13-311, 20-(ii) 150
13-26,9-372,20-12(ii), 20-12(hh) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 450
13-26,9-372,20-12(II), 20-12 (hh) 600
13-26, 9-372, 2042(ii), 20-12(hh) 600
13-26, 20-12(ii), 9-372, 20-12(hh) 600
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ll) 1500
13-26,20-12(ii), 13-311 1500
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ll) 900
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 450
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 1500
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 900
9-372, 13-26, 2012(ll) 900
9-372, 13-26, 20-12 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500

Page 10 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13934
1710

CITATION ISSUE DATE VIOLATION
ADDRESS STREET NO. CITE NO. (LAST) FIRST NAME
183 11/01/18 Orange Avenue 2417 41694 n/a Orange Acres LLC 184 10/26/18 Orange Avenue 2417 40480 n/a Northbound Treatment Services 185 10/26/18 Orange Avenue 2417 40481 n/a Orange Acres LLC 186 10/16/18 Orange Avenue 2417 41685 n/a Orange Acres LLC 187 10/16/18 Orange Avenue 2417 41686 n/a Northbound Treatment Services 188 09/05/18 Orange Avenue 1509 40694 n/a Hotel California by the Sea LLC 189 08/14/18 Ornage Avenue 1509 41705 n/a Nexgen Management LLC 190 05/30/19 Pamela Lane 2258 40747 Family Trust Boctor 191 01/08/19 Paularino Ave. 959 40513 House Inc. Playa
192 01/08/19 Paularino Ave. 959 40514 Dalal Abedrabo
193 12/10/18 Paularino Avenue 949 40509 House Inc Playa 194 12/10/18 Paularino Avenue 959 40510 Dalal Abedrabo
195 10/08/18 Paularino Avenue 959 41681 Dalal Abe drabo 196 10/08/18 Paularino Avenue 959 41683 n/a Playa House, Inc. 197 06/13/16 Pierpoint 598 41956 Moheinani Gina
198 12/07/17 Plumer 697 40018 Recovery Pillars
199 12/07/17 Plumer 697 40019 LLC Heathers-Plumer
200 10/24/17 Plumer 697 40003 Recovery Pillars
201 10/24/17 Plumer 697 40004 Plumer LLC Heathers
202 10/09/18 Plumeria Place 3465 40477 n/a Nguyen Loc Van/ Nguyen Hong 203 10/09/18 Plumeria Place 3465 40478 n/a Mainstay Recovery LLC 204 10/13/16 Pomona 2162 41558 Martin Jose Roma & Maria G 205 10/17/16 Pomona 1798 40598 Properties One LLC Barry Saywitz 206 10/17/16 Pomona 1798 40599 LLC Morningside Recovery 207 03/20/18 Pomona Ave 2265 B 2267 B 42417 n/a Clean Path Recovery LLC 208 03/20/18 Pomona Avenue 2275 2277 42420 n/a Lucy Lee Holdings LLC 209 03/20/18 Pomona Avenue 2275 2277 42419 n/a Clean Path Recovery LLC 210 03/20/18 Pomona Avenue 2265 B 2267 B 42418 n/a Pomona Assoc CM LLC 211 03/05/18 Pomona Avenue 2275 2277 40668 n/a Lucy Lee Holdings LLC 212 03/05/18 Pomona Avenue 2275 2277 40667 n/a Clean Path Recovery LLC 213 03/05/18 Pomona Avenue 2265 B 2267 B 40666 n/a Pomona Assoc CM LLC 214 01/30/18 Pomona Avenue 2265 (Unit B) 2267 40032 n/a Clean Path Recovery LLC 215 01/30/18 Pomona Avenue 2265 (Unit B) 2267 40033 CM LLC Pomona Association 216 01/29/18 Pomona Avenue 2275 2277 40026 n/a Lucy Lee Holdings LLC 217 01/29/18 Pomona Avenue 2275 2277 40028 n/a Clean Path Recovery LLC 218 03/24/17 Royce 3044 40885 Brown Gillian
219 11/07/18 San Bernardino Place 1589 40482 n/a The Ohio House, LLC

Page 11 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13935
1711
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12, 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12, 13-323 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450.00
20-12(ii), 13-26-13-311 1,500.00
20-12(ii), 13-20, 13-311 1,500.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-311 900.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-311 900.00
13-311, 20-12 (ii), 13-26 450
13-311, 20-12(ii), 13-26 450
13-226,13-200.88,13-323,9-372,20-12II 1650
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
9-372, 13-26 600
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 450
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ii), 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 2500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 2500
20-12, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 2500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 2500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 Iii), 20-12 (n), CBC 1500
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 750
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 750
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-311 150
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 1500

Page 12 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13936
1712

CITATION ISSUE DATE VIOLATION
ADDRESS STREET NO. CITE NO. (LAST) FIRST NAME
220 11/07/18 San Bernardino Place 1589 40483 n/a Barry Saywitz Properties One 221 11/07/18 San Bernardino Place 1578 40485 Fabrizio Pauri 222 10/25/18 San Bernardino Place 1578 42311 n/a The Ohio House, LLC 223 10/25/18 San Bernardino Place 158 42312 Fabrizio Panri 224 10/25/18 San Bernardino Place 1589 42313 n/a The Ohio House, LLC 225 10/25/18 San Bernardino Place 1589 42314 n/a Barry Saywitz Properties One 226 09/10/18 San Bernardino Place 1578 41718 Fabrizio Pauri 227 09/10/18 San Bernardino Place 1589 41715 n/a The Ohio House, LLC 228 09/10/18 San Bernardino Place 1578 41717 n/a The Ohio House, LLC 229 09/10/18 San Bernardino Place 1589 41716 n/a Barry Saywitz Properties One 230 08/18/16 Santa Ana 2641 40581 LLC Bjormad LA
231 08/18/16 Santa Ana 2641 40582 & Addiction Night Psychology 232 10/13/16 Santa Ana 2641 40595 & Addiction Inc. Inshght Psychology 233 05/31/18 Tours Lane 334 40454 n/a 334 Tourt Trust
234 05/17/18 Tours Lane 336 40683 Anderson Joanne
235 05/17/18 Tours Lane 336 40682 n/a Chadwick House LLC 236 05/17/18 Tours Lane 334 40681 n/a 334 Tours Trust
237 05/17/18 Tours Lane 334 40680 n/a Chadwick House LLC 238 03/21/18 Tours Lane 336 40953 n/a Chadwick House LLC 239 03/21/18 Tours Lane 336 40954 Anderson Joanne
240 03/20/18 Tours Lane 334 42422 n/a Chadwick House LLC 241 03/20/18 Tours Lane 334 42421 n/a 334 Tours Trust
242 02/16/18 Tours Lane 334 40042 n/a Chadwick House LLC 243 02/16/18 Tours Lane 334 40043 Kimmes Nancy
244 02/16/18 Tours Lane 336 40044 n/a Chadwick House LLC 245 02/16/18 Tours Lane 336 40045 Anderson Joanne
246 07/11/16 Tulip 175 41965 Roya Rohanaki
247 07/11/16 Tulip 175 41966 Recovery Inc. Compass Rose 248 08/12/16 Tulip 175 40579 Roya Sohanaki
249 08/12/16 Tulip 175 40580 Recovery Inc. Compass Rose 250 08/31/16 Tulip 175 40587 Roya Sohanaki
251 08/31/16 Tulip 175 40588 Recovery Inc. Congress Rose 252 08/08/16 Tustin 2421 41973 Capital, LLC Evergreen Investment 253 08/08/16 Tustin 2421 41974 Sabahi Sonni
254 08/29/16 Tustin 2421 40585 Capital LLC Evergreen Investment 255 08/29/16 Tustin 2421 40586 Sabahi Sonni
256 09/13/16 Tustin 2421 40593 Capital LLC Evergreeen Invest.

Page 13 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13937
1713
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450
9-372, 13-26, 13-23, 20-12 (ll) 600
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12(n), 20-12(ll) 750
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 1200
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 1500
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-322 1500
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 900
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-322 900
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ll) 900
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ll) 900
13-26, 13-311, 21-12(ll) 1500
13-26, 13-311, 2012(ll) 1500
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ii) 750
13-30, 13-26,13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 750
13-26, 13-30(9.1), 13-311, 20-12(ll) 1200
13-26, 13-30(9.1), 13-311, 20-12 1200
13-26, 13-30, 13-311-20-12(ll) 2000

Page 14 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13938
1714

CITATION ISSUE DATE VIOLATION
ADDRESS STREET NO. CITE NO. (LAST) FIRST NAME
257 09/13/16 Tustin 2421 40594 Sabahi Sonni
258 05/11/18 Tustin Avenue 2175 40531 n/a The Ohio House, LLC 259 05/11/18 Tustin Avenue 2175 40530 n/a AQABA LLC
260 04/05/18 Tustin Avenue 2175 40956 n/a 96 Discovery
261 04/05/18 Tustin Avenue 2175 40957 n/a The Ohio House LLC 262 02/27/18 Tustin Avenue 2175 42412 n/a AQABA LLC
263 02/17/18 Tustin Avenue 2175 42413 n/a The Ohio House LLC 264 06/02/16 Valencia 1009 41955 Recovery LLC Morningside 265 07/07/16 Valencia 1009 41963 Saywitz Barry
266 07/07/16 Valencia 1009 41964 Recovery LLC Morningstar 267 08/10/16 Valencia 1009 40577 Saywitz Barry
268 08/10/16 Valencia 1009 40578 LLC Morningside Recovery 269 09/06/16 Valencia 1009 40589 Saywitz Barry
270 09/06/16 Valencia 1009 40590 Recovery Inc. Monringside 271 12/06/17 Victoria 310 40016 Cefalia James John
272 10/31/17 Victoria 310 40009 Project Corp Sober Partners 273 10/31/17 Victoria 310 40010 Cefalia James John
274 06/20/18 Victoria Street 357 40547 Bartolone Damon
275 06/20/18 Victoria Street 357 40546 n/a Windward Way Recovery LLC 276 06/20/18 Victoria Street 351 40545 Bartolone Damon
277 06/20/18 Victoria Street 351 40544 n/a Windward Way Recovery LLC 278 06/12/18 Victoria Street 357 40197 n/a Windward Way Recovery, LLC 279 06/12/18 Victoria Street 357 40196 Bartolone Damon
280 06/12/18 Victoria Street 351 40194 n/a Windward Way Recovery, LLC 281 06/12/18 Victoria Street 351 40193 Bartolone Damon
282 06/04/18 Victoria Street 357 40538 n/a Windward Way Recovery LLC 283 06/04/18 Victoria Street 357 40537 Bartolone Damon
284 06/04/18 Victoria Street 351 40536 n/a Windward Way Recovery 285 06/04/18 Victoria Street 351 40535 Bartolone Damon
286 03/01/16 Virginia 120 41975 Burns Cindy
287 04/08/19 Virginia Pl 175 40733 Treatment Svces. Northbound 288 04/08/19 Virginia Pl 175 40734 Equities LLC Norah
289 03/13/19 Virginia Pl 175 40725 Treatment Svces. Northbound 290 03/13/19 Virginia Pl 175 40726 Equities LLC Norah
291 02/05/19 Virginia Pl 175 40702 Treatment Svces. Northbound 292 02/05/19 Virginia Pl 175 40704 Equities LLC Norah
293 12/06/17 W. Bay Street, Unit S 431 40013 Recovery Services California Prime

Page 15 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13939
1715
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-26, 13-30(a.1), 13-311, 20-12(ll) 2000
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-226,13-200.88,13-323,9-372,20- 750
13-326, 13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 600
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ii), 20-12 (hh) 450
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ll) 900
13-26, 9-372, 20-12 (ll) 900
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ll) 1500
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 1500
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-323 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-323 450
13-30(9.1), 13-26, 13-200-.88, 13-311, 150
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-322 1,500.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-322 1,500.00
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-322 900.00
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-322 900.00
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-322 450.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-322 450.00
12-26, 20-12, 13-322 450

Page 16 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13940
1716

CITATION ISSUE DATE VIOLATION
ADDRESS STREET NO. CITE NO. (LAST) FIRST NAME
294 12/06/17 W. Bay Street, Unit S 431 40014 C/O Robert Crossley 431 Bay Street, LLC 295 12/06/17 W. Coast Hwy., Suite 300 3101 40015 Project Corp Sober Partners 296 05/02/19 Wallace Avenue 2068 40714 OC LLC Focus
297 05/02/19 Wallace Avenue 2068 40715 Shores Recovery Sunset 298 10/25/16 Wilson W 580 41564 Hilario Angel
299 11/28/16 Wilson W 580 41573 Hilario Angel

Page 17 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13941
1717
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-26, 20-12, 13-322 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 900
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450.00
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 1200
9-732, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ll) 2000

Page 18 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13942
1718

ARIOS, JUSTIN
From: Jason Brewer <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 1:33 PM
To: Housing Element; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Comment re Chapter 3 of City of Costa Mesa’s Draft Housing Element, 2021-2029 Attachments: Table 1.pdf; Table 2.pdf; Table 3.pdf
Greetings,

I submit the following comment in response to Chapter 3 of the City of Costa Mesa’s Public Review Draft (August 2021):

Starting at page 3-45, the Public Review Draft (August 2021) addresses Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH). This section of the City’s Housing Element fails to address the requirements set forth in Government Code § 65583 and disregards the City’s own discriminatory housing practice reflected in its Zoning Code and its treatment of Supportive Housing for disabled persons (defined as Group Homes by the City).

The City’s Draft Housing Element is grossly inadequate because it fails to address the greatest source of housing discrimination in Costa Mesa: The City of Costa Mesa itself.

Nowhere does the Draft Housing Element address the effect of the City’s discriminatory zoning regulations against Group Homes (i.e., Supportive Housing for persons with disabilities.)

If Supportive Housing provides housing to persons with disabilities, then the City defines and classifies that residential use as a “Group Home”:

Group home. A facility that is being used as a supportive living environment for persons who are considered handicapped under state or federal law. A group home operated by a single operator or service provider (whether licensed or unlicensed) constitutes a single facility, whether the facility occupies one (1) or more dwelling units. Group homes shall not include the following: (1) residential care facilities; (2) any group home that operates as a single housekeeping unit.

The definition of Group Home includes Sober Living Homes, which are defined as: 1719

Sober living home means a group home for persons who are recovering from a drug and/or alcohol addiction and who are considered handicapped under state or federal law. Sober living homes shall not include the following: (1) residential care facilities; (2) any sober living home that operates as a single housekeeping unit.

Since the City’s last Housing Element in 2013, the City has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination against Supportive Housing, specifically, Group Homes and Sober Living Homes.

Attached to this email is a chart that illustrate the effect of the City’s discrimination against Group Homes. It shows that even though Group Homes make up an infinitesimal percentage of the total number of dwellings in Costa Mesa, the City’s discriminatory zoning practices have further reduced the number of housing opportunities for persons with disabilities.

No new Group Homes have opened in the City since 2015 following the City adoption of Ordinance 14-13 (enacting Zoning Code Chapter XV) and Ordinance 15-11 (enacting Zoning Code Chapter XVI).

The City acknowledges in public records that as of in 2017, there were only existing 99 Group Homes in Costa Mesa, comprising 0.002% of the total number of dwellings in Costa Mesa (42,867). (See Table 1 attached to this email.)

Each of those 99 Group Homes was subject to the City’s discriminatory zoning regulations under Zoning Code Chapters XV and XVI, which prohibited each of the 99 Group Homes to continue providing housing to disabled persons unless they obtained a permit.

Of the 99 Group Homes, 76 homes applied for permits pursuant to either Zoning Code Chapter XV or Chapter XVI. The others quit the process as futile in light of the City’s unwavering policy of discrimination.

Of the 76 Group Homes that applied for permits pursuant to either Zoning Code Chapter XV or Chapter XVI, the City granted by 2919 only 14 permits, the remainder were denied by the City or abandoned the application process as futile. The last permit granted was in 2019; no new applications for permits have been submit because the City’s policy of discrimination deters person seeking to provide Supportive Housing to persons with disabilities. 1720

Group Homes without permits are subject to citation, criminal prosecution and civil abatement by the City. The City has aggressively cited Group Homes that provide housing to disabled persons but lack a City-issued permit. (See Tables 2 and 3 attached to his email.)

To date, the City has also sued 11 Supportive Housing providers as a “public nuisance” solely on the basis that each provides Supportive Housing to persons with disabilities but lacks a City-issued permit pursuant to Zoning Code Chapter XV or Chapter XVI.

Under the City’s Zoning Code the only zoning district in which Group Homes are permit of right is the Institutional and Recreational district, which is expressly reserved for non-residential uses. (CMMC 13-30 Table: Land Use Matrix.)

The complete failure of the City’s Housing Element, 2021-2029 (Public Review Draft) to discuss – let alone address -- the City’s pattern or practice of zoning discrimination not only offends Government Code § 65008, but utterly fails to meeting the statutory requirements pursuant to Government Code § 65583(c)(10) regarding the City’s compliance with Government Code § 8899.50(a)(1) (“affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity . . . fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws.”)

Thank you for your consideration.

Jason Brewer
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.
1721
Application of City’s Regulation of Group Homes, Zoning Code Chapters XV and XVI 2010:
42,867
Dwellings in
Costa Mesa
2017:
99 Sober Living Homes in
Costa Mesa
2018:
76 Applications
submitted by unlicensed
and licensed Sober
Living homes subject
Zoning Code Chapters
XV (14-13) or XVI (15-
11)
2018:
13 Permits Granted
under Zoning Code
Chapters XV (14-13) or XVI
(15-11)
2019:
14 Permits Granted under
C
ode Chapters XV (14-13) or XVI
(15-11)
Total for 2010:
42,867 dwellings
“Based on the most recent
data compiled by City staff,
there are approximately 99
sober living homes within
Costa Mesa. Of these, 38 are
located in single-family
neighborhoods and 61 are
within multi-family
residential zones.”
“The City has received
applications for 65 sober
living homes and 11
licensed treatment
facilities that are subject
to compliance with
Ordinance Nos. 14-13
and 15-11.”
“Twelve (12) sober living
homes serving six or fewer
residents have been
approved by the City, and
one sober living home
serving 13 men has been
approved.”
“Twelve sober living homes
serving six or fewer residents have
been approved by the City, and
two sober living homes serving
seven or more residents have
been approved by the City.”
(City Housing
Element, 2013-
2021, CityGP
248)
(City PCAR, 08/28/2017, City
12946; City PCAR,
08/28/2017, City 12748)
(City PCARs,
01/08/2018, City 8132,
7494, 6928, 9975,
10670; City PCARs,
07/08/2018, City 11972,
11448)
(City PCARs, 01/08/2018,
City 8132, 7494, 6928,
9975, 10670; City PCARs,
07/08/2018, City 11972,
11448)
(City PCAR, 02/11/2019, City
13504)
42,867 99/42,867 = 0.002% 76/99 = 77% • 13/76 = 17%
• 13/ 99 = 13%
• 13/42,867 = 0.0003%
• 14/76 = 18%
• 14/ 99 = 14%
• 14/42,867 = 0.0003%
1722
Group Homes Cited WEB

CITATION ISSUE DATE VIOLATION
ADDRESS STREET NO. CITE NO. (LAST) FIRST NAME
1 10/04/16 16th Pl. 413 40883 Course LLC Stay the
2 10/04/16 16th Pl. 4134 40884 Flower Cypress
3 06/01/16 18th E. 116 41475 Grant Sherry
4 04/08/19 18th St. E 235 40735 Alexander LLC Walton
5 04/08/19 18th St. E 235 40736 Recovery LLC Raw
6 04/08/19 18th St. E 241 40737 Alexander LLC Walton
7 04/08/19 18th St. E 241 40738 Recovery LLC Raw
8 03/15/19 18th St. E 235 40727 Treatment Svces. Northbound 9 03/15/19 18th St. E 235 40728 Recovery LLC Raw
10 03/15/19 18th St. E 235 40729 Alexander LLC Walton
11 03/15/19 18th St. E 241 40730 Treatment Svces. Northbound 12 03/15/19 18th St. E 241 40731 Recovery LLC Raw
13 03/15/19 18th St. E 241 40732 Alexander LLC Walton
14 02/05/19 18th St. E 235 40707 Alexander LLC Walton
15 02/05/19 18th St. E 235 40708 Treatment Svces. Northbound 16 02/05/19 18th St. E 235 40709 Recovery LLC Raw
17 02/05/19 18th St. E 241 40710 Alexander LLC Walton
18 02/05/19 18th St. E 241 40711 Treatment Svces. Northbound 19 02/05/19 18th St. E 241 40712 Recovery LLC Raw
20 10/04/16 18th St. W 679 40881 Saywitz Prop. One Barry 21 10/04/16 18th St. W 679 40882 The Discovery Houses Morningside Recovery 22 11/07/16 18th W. 679 41570 Morningside Recovery LLC Discovery Houses 23 11/07/16 18th W. 685 41571 Discovery Houses Morningside Recovery 24 11/29/16 18th W. 679 40351 Saywitz Properties One Barry 25 11/29/16 18th W. 679 40353 LLC/Discovery Houses Morningstar Recovery 26 12/01/16 18th W. 685 40356 LLC/Discovery Houses Morningstar Recovery 27 12/01/16 18th W. 685 40358 Properties Two Barry Saywitz 28 02/12/19 19th St. W 864 20399 Photoglou Living Trust Mark 29 11/07/16 19th W 679 41572 Properties One Barry Saywitz 30 10/13/16 21st E 175 41560 Norwood Kenneth
31 07/20/16 23rd 160 41652 Recovery LLC Windward Way
32 07/20/16 23rd 160 41654 LLC DZ
33 07/21/16 23rd 165 41655 Garden LLC Aunties
34 07/21/16 23rd 165 41656 Recovery LLC Windward Way

1723
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 450
13-26, 13-311 450
13-26, 9-372 300
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 1,500.00
13-26,20-12(ii), 13-323 1,500.00
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 1,500.00
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 1,500.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 900.00
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 900.00
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 900.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 900.00
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 900.00
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 900.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450.00
9-372, 13-26 600
9-372, 13-26 600
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 1200
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ll) 1200
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ll) 2000
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ll) 2000
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 2000
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 2000
105.1, 20-12(ii), 13-105(a), 20-6(o), 13- $2,100.00
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ll) 1200
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 1200
13-26, 9-372 450
13-26, 9-372, 20-12 450
13-26, 9-372, 20-12 600
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ii), 20-12 (hh) 600

1724

CITATION ISSUE DATE VIOLATION
ADDRESS STREET NO. CITE NO. (LAST) FIRST NAME
35 03/05/18 Adams Avenue 1650 40664 n/a Clean Path Recovery LLC 36 02/05/19 Albert Pl 114 40705 Recovery LLC Windward Way 37 02/05/19 Albert Pl 114 40706 Place Properties LLC Albert Pl 38 04/05/18 Albert Place 114 40117 n/a Albert Place Poroperties, LLC 39 04/05/18 Albert Place 114 40116 n/a Windward Way Recovery LLC 40 02/20/18 Albert Place 114 40945 n/a Winward Way Recovery, LLC 41 02/20/18 Albert Place 114 40947 n/a Albert Place Properties, LLC 42 07/21/16 Alder 2527 41660 Horluchi Ellen
43 07/26/16 Anaheim 1769 41661 Yates Raymond
44 07/26/16 Anaheim 1769 41663 Recovery LLC Morningside 45 07/27/16 Anaheim 1865 41665 Harold Jusine
46 09/09/16 Anaheim 1769 40875 Yates Raymond
47 04/16/18 Anaheim Avenue 2216 40960 n/a Playa House Inc 48 03/08/18 Anaheim Avenue 2216 40104 Pourmalek Reza
49 06/22/16 Babb 2959 41949 Moheimani Assad
50 04/12/19 Bernard Street 544 40739 Assets LLC Enclave 51 04/12/19 Bernard Street 544 40740 Recovery LLC Dream 52 09/05/18 Cabrillo Street 200, 202, 204, 206 40691 Connor Alice 53 09/05/18 Cabrillo Street 200, 202, 204, 206 40690 n/a Pacific Sho9res Recovery LLC 54 08/28/18 Cabrillo Street 200, 202, 204 206 40423 Connor Alice 55 08/28/18 Cabrillo Street 200, 202, 204 206 40423 Connor Alice 56 08/17/18 Cabrillo Street 200 202 204 206 41709 n/a Pacific Shores Recovery LLC 57 08/17/18 Cabrillo Street 200 202 204 206 41710 Connor Alice 58 01/25/18 Canadian Drive 3159 40927 I, LLC CDM Housing 59 06/12/18 Cecil Place 208 40462 n/a SoCal Recovery
60 06/12/18 Cecil Place 208 40460 n/a VDP Properties LP 61 03/19/18 Center Street 725 40110 n/a Asana Recovery
62 03/19/18 Center Street 725 40109 Malili Daniel
63 05/25/16 Cheyenne 1055 41948 Care Service Guardian Health 64 05/09/18 E. 16th Place 271 40678 n/a Carr Timothy WTW Revoc Tr 65 05/09/18 E. 16th Place 271 40677 n/a Casa Capri LLC
66 05/09/18 E. 16th Place 269 40676 Irani Zackary
67 05/09/18 E. 16th Place 269 40675 n/a Casa Capri LLC
68 04/27/18 E. 16th Place 271 40024 n/a Carr Timothy WTW Revoc Tr 69 04/27/18 E. 16th Place 271 40023 n/a Casa Capri LLC
70 04/27/18 E. 16th Place 269 40022 Irani Zackary
71 04/27/18 E. 16th Place 269 40021 n/a Casa Capri LLC

1725
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1,500.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 500.00
13-35, 13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, CBC 1200
13-35, 13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, CBC 1200
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 9-372 450
13-26, 13-311 300
20-12, 13-26, 13-311 450
20-12, 13-311 450
20-12, 13-30(7.1), 13-311, 13-26 1050
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 13.200.88,13-311, 2012 750
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-30, 105.1 750.00
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 450.00
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 1500
20-12 (ii), 13-323, 13-26 900
20-12 (ii), 13-323, 13-26 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 450
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-200.88, 13-311, 13-26, 20-12 600
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900

1726

CITATION ISSUE DATE VIOLATION
ADDRESS STREET NO. CITE NO. (LAST) FIRST NAME
72 04/19/18 E. 16th Place 271 40016 n/a Carr Timothy W T W Revoc 73 04/19/18 E. 16th Place 269 40015 Irani Zackary
74 04/19/18 E. 16th Place 271 40013 n/a Casa Capri LLC
75 04/19/18 E. 16th Place 269 40012 n/a Casa Capri LLC
76 06/22/18 E. 21st Street 175 40972 Norwood Kenneth
77 06/22/18 E. 21st Street 175 40971 n/a SoCal Recovery 78 06/12/18 E. 21st Street 175 40464 Norwood Kenneth
79 06/12/18 E. 21st Street 175 40463 n/a SoCal Recovery 80 06/04/18 E. 21st Street 175 40459 Norwood Kenneth
81 11/26/18 E. Wilson Street 131 42317 Walton Keith L.
82 10/26/18 E. Wilson Street 125 42315 n/a Northbound Treatment Services 83 10/26/18 E. Wilson Street 125 42316 Walton Keith L.
84 10/26/18 E. Wilson Street 131 42318 Walton Keith L.
85 10/08/18 E. Wilson Street 125 42300 Walton Keith L.
86 10/08/18 E. Wilson Street 125 42301 n/a Northbound Treatment Services 87 10/08/18 E. Wilson Street 131 42302 Walton Keith L.
88 10/08/18 E. Wilson Street 131 42303 n/a Northbound Treatment Services 89 08/06/18 E. Wilson Street 131 40469 n/a Northbound Treatment Services 90 08/06/18 E. Wilson Street 125 40470 n/a Northbound Treatment Services 91 08/06/18 E. Wilson Street 125 40466 Walton Keith L.
92 08/06/18 E. Wilson Street 131 40471 Walton Keith L.
93 11/30/16 Elden 2214 41345 Ohio House LLC Branden Stump 94 11/30/16 Elden 2214 41346 Cefalia James
95 10/12/17 Flower St. 268 40950 Johnson Gary Richard
96 10/12/17 Flower St. 268 40951 & Wellness RAW Recovery 97 02/08/18 Flower Street 268 40037 n/a Raw Recovery LLC 98 02/08/18 Flower Street 268 40038 Johnson Gary Richard 99 01/30/18 Flower Street 268 40029 Johnson Gary Richard 100 01/30/18 Flower Street 268 40031 n/a Raw Recovery LLC 101 10/15/18 Fordham Drive 2372 42307 Pedriana Mical D. 102 02/05/18 Fordham Drive 2372 40937 Pedriana Mical
103 05/19/16 Grant 3044 41338 Rosenbaum Melvin
104 05/19/16 Grant 3044 41340 Care Services Guardian Health 105 03/19/18 Grant Avenue 3044 40111 n/a D'Amore Healthcare 106 03/19/18 Grant Avenue 3044 40113 Rosenbaun Carolyn
107 03/16/18 Harbor Boulevard 2374 #104 42416 n/a ZMV Partnership 108 06/22/18 Hudson Avenue 783 40549 Norwood Kenneth

Page 5 ends

City 13929
1727
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-93 ( e ) 600
20-12 (ii), 13-323, 13-26, 13-93 ( e ) 600
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-93 ( e ) 600
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-93 ( e ) 600
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 400
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 600
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 600
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 ( e ), 20-12 (ii) 1650
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 ( e ) 1650
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-311, 20-12(ii), 13-26 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 13-200.88,13-311,20-12 600
13-26,13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 600
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 1500

Page 6 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13930
1728

Page 7 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13931
1729
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 1500
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-311 900
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-311 900
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-311 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 1,500.00
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 1,500.00
20-12(ii) 13-323-13-26 1,500.00
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 1,500.00
20-12(ii), 13-323, 13-26 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 450
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 450
13-311, 13-36, 20-12(ii) 450
13-311, 13-36, 20-12(ii) 450
13-311, 13-36, 20-12(ii) 450
13-311, 13-36, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 150
13-311, 13-36, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 9-372 150
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 1,500.00
13-323, 13-26-20-12 (ii) 1,500.00
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 450
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450

Page 8 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13932
1730

Page 9 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13933
1731
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-311, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26,13-200.88, 13-323, 9-372, 20-12 600
12-26, 13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 600
13-26, 20-12(ii), 9-372, 20-12(hh) 150
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, CBC 105.1 2000
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, CBC 105.1 2000
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 750
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 750
13-26, 9-372 150
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-311 450.00
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-311 450.00
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 1500
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-323 900
13-26, 13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 1200
13-26, 13-311, 20-(ii) 150
13-26,9-372,20-12(ii), 20-12(hh) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12 450
13-26,9-372,20-12(II), 20-12 (hh) 600
13-26, 9-372, 2042(ii), 20-12(hh) 600
13-26, 20-12(ii), 9-372, 20-12(hh) 600
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ll) 1500
13-26,20-12(ii), 13-311 1500
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ll) 900
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 450
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 1500
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 900
9-372, 13-26, 2012(ll) 900
9-372, 13-26, 20-12 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 1500

Page 10 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13934
1732

Page 11 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13935
1733
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 1500
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12, 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12, 13-323 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450.00
20-12(ii), 13-26-13-311 1,500.00
20-12(ii), 13-20, 13-311 1,500.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-311 900.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-311 900.00
13-311, 20-12 (ii), 13-26 450
13-311, 20-12(ii), 13-26 450
13-226,13-200.88,13-323,9-372,20-12II 1650
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-311 450
9-372, 13-26 600
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 450
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ii), 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 2500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 2500
20-12, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 2500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 2500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 Iii), 20-12 (n), CBC 1500
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (n), CBC 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 750
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii), 20-12 (n), CBC 750
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-311 150
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 1500

Page 12 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13936
1734

Page 13 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13937
1735
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-323 900
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-323 450
9-372, 13-26, 13-23, 20-12 (ll) 600
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12(n), 20-12(ll) 750
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 1200
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 1500
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-322 1500
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 900
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-322 900
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-322, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ll) 900
13-26, 13-311, 20-12(ll) 900
13-26, 13-311, 21-12(ll) 1500
13-26, 13-311, 2012(ll) 1500
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ii) 750
13-30, 13-26,13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 750
13-26, 13-30(9.1), 13-311, 20-12(ll) 1200
13-26, 13-30(9.1), 13-311, 20-12 1200
13-26, 13-30, 13-311-20-12(ll) 2000

Page 14 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13938
1736

Page 15 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13939
1737
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-26, 13-30(a.1), 13-311, 20-12(ll) 2000
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-226,13-200.88,13-323,9-372,20- 750
13-326, 13-200.88, 13-311, 20-12 600
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ii), 20-12 (hh) 450
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ll) 900
13-26, 9-372, 20-12 (ll) 900
13-26, 9-372, 20-12(ll) 1500
9-372, 13-26, 20-12(ll) 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 1500
13-323, 13-26, 20-12(ii) 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 1500
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-323 1500
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 900
13-323, 13-26, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12 (ii) 450
20-12 (ii), 13-26, 13-323 450
13-30(9.1), 13-26, 13-200-.88, 13-311, 150
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-322 1,500.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-322 1,500.00
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-322 900.00
13-26, 20-12(ii), 13-322 900.00
13-26, 20-12 (ii), 13-322 450.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-322 450.00
12-26, 20-12, 13-322 450

Page 16 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13940
1738

Page 17 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13941
1739
CCMC SECT. CITED AMOUNT
13-26, 20-12, 13-322 450
13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ii) 900
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450.00
20-12(ii), 13-26, 13-323 450.00
9-372, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12 1200
9-732, 13-26, 13-323, 20-12(ll) 2000

Page 18 ends

Exported on February 4, 2021 5:27:11 PM PST
City 13942
1740
Closed Operations WEB
Street Name Street No. Program Name Beds
1 16th Place 413 Clean Path Recovery 6
2 16th Place Reflections Recovery
Center 6
3 16th Place 491 South Coast Behavioral
Health 6
4 18th Street W 777 777 House 12
5 18th Street W 679 Discovery House 6
6 18th Street W 685 Discovery House 78
7 19th Street E 177 Agape House 6
8 Alder Lane 2527 New Family Solutions 6
9 Anaheim 2216 Playa House Unknown
10 Anaheim Avenue 1769 Morning Side Recovery 6
11 Anaheim Avenue 2216 Playa House Unknown
12 Arbor Street 973 Solid Landings 6
13 Augusta 1180 Hampton Unknown
14 Babb Street 2959 Unknown 10
15 Bay St 431 Unknown
16 Boston Way 3145 Solid Landings 15
17 Bowling Green 273 Solid landings 6
18 Briar Rose 1631 Monarch Recovery 6
19 Cabrillo Street 218 Sober Sanctuaries, Inc. 12
20 Canadian Drive 3159 Clean Path Recovery 6
21 Cassia Avenue 3107 Rock Solid 22
22 Charleston St 1143 Solid Landings 8
23 Charleston St 1174 Solid Landings 6
24 Cheyenne Street 1055 Solid Landings 6
25 Conway 1252 Solid Landings 6
26 Coolidge Avenue 3004 Clean Path Recovery 6
27 Coolidge Avenue 3004 Solid Landings 18
28 Dahlia Avenue 924 Solid Landings 6
29 Darrel 871 Solid Landings 6
30 Doctors Circle 2111 Unknown

1741
Street Name Street No. Program Name Beds
31 E. 18th St 166 Casa Capri Unknown
32 Flower 268 Unknown
33 Gisler Avenue 1811 Solid Landings 6
34 Grant Avenue 3044 Solid Landings 6
35 Hamilton Street 394 Solid Landings 6
36 Hamilton Street 396 Unknown
37 Hamilton Street 382 Solid Landings Unknown
38 Harbor Boulevard, Unit 2374 Strong Woman Unknown
39 Iowa Street 1804 Lotus Place Recovery 6
40 Joann Street 574 Unknown
41 Joann Street 578 Unknown
42 La Salle 2829 Unknown
43 La Salle Avenue 2869 OC Recovery Unknown
44 La Salle Avenue 2829 Solid Landings 6
45 Marseilles Way 2450 Lotus Recovery Unknown
46 Marseilles Way 2450 Unknown
47 Mendoza Avenue 2869 Clean Path Recovery Unknown
48 Meyer Pl 2012 Unknown Unknown
49 Monte Vista Avenue 291 Unknown 6
50 Monterey Avenue 2822 Solid Landings 6
51 Nebraska Place 3238 Healing Path 4
52 Olympic Ave 13741 Unknown Unknown
53 Olympic Avenue 13741 Solid Landings 6
54 Orange Avenue 1513 Hotel California by the Sea 6
55 Orange Avenue 1775 Morning Side Recovery 12
56 Orange Avenue 1965 Solid Landings 6
57 Orange Avenue Unit A 2379 Balboa Horizons Unknown
58 Orange Avenue Unit B & 2379 Balboa Horizons Unknown
59 Pamela Ln 2264 The Book House 16
60 Paularino Ave 959 Playa House 6
61 Paularino Avenue 778 Agape House 6
62 Placentia Ave., Unit B 2190 Unknown
63 Placentia Avenue 2212 A-D
2218 A-D Heritage House Unknown

1742
Street Name Street No. Program Name Beds
64 Plumer Street 697 Pillars Recovery 15
65 Plumer Street 697 Solid landings 15
66 Plumeria Place 3465 Mainstay Recovery 6
67 Pomona Avenue 1827 Clean Path Recovery 13
68 Pomona Avenue 2220 Safe Harbor Treatment
Center For Women
6 69 Raleigh Avenue 2186 Agape House 6
70 Republic Avenue 2131 Sam's House 6
71 San Bernardino 1589 Ohio House 7
72 San Bernardino 1578 Ohio House 8
73 Sturgeon Dr 506 Time 2 Care llc 6
74 Trinity Drive 3066 Camilla's Recovery 6
75 Valencia Street 1009 Morning Side 24
76 Velasco Lane 2866 Easy Way Out LLC Unknown
77 Victoria St. 357 Windward Way Unknown
78 Victoria St. 351 Windward Way Unknown
79 Victoria Street 310 Sober Partners 24
80 Victoria Street 310 Sober Partners Project Unknown
81 Virginia Place 132 Sober Living House 6
82 W. Bay Street 431 California Prime Recovery Unknown
83 Walnut 271 Solid Landings 6

1743

ARIOS, JUSTIN
From: Keith Randle <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 1:53 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Garrett M. Prybylo; Isaac R. Zfaty; Housing Element; [email protected]; [email protected]; Keith Randle Subject: Formal Complaint of Discrimination by the City of Costa Mesa California Code 65000 et,al.

Attachments: HCD Discrimination Complaint City of Costa Mesa _000163.pdf; HCD letter to City of Anaheim_ 000165.pdf; HCD City of Costa Mesa Resolution NO 18-16_000157.pdf; HCD City of Costa Mesa Conditionals of approval_000158.pdf; HCD City of Costa Mesa Letter dasted July 20 2018 from Sheri Vander Dussen_000159.pdf; HCD City of Costa Mesa Letter dasted August 7th From Fidel Gamboa with operatort permit application_000160.pdf; HCD City of Costa Mesa Letter datted September 9, 2021 from Sheri Vander Dussen re operators permitt_000162.pdf 0Shannan
I am sending this formal compliant (attached) against the City of Costa Mesa. The City is violating California Code 65000 et.al, including 65008, 65580 and 65585
Time is of the essence. I ask you to review the attachments and that you send a cease and desist letter, similar to the one you sent to the cities of Anaheim (attached) and Encinitas earlier this year. I also request that you put a halt to the issuing of Costa Mesa's Housing Element.

I will also send you a hard copy to you at:
2020 W El Camino Ave, Suite 500 Sacramento Ca. 95833. If you have a different mailing address let me know.

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to [email protected] I appreciate you looking into this matter.

Keith Randle
http://www.summitcoastalliving.com
949 689-8880
2100 Highland Drive
Newport Beach Ca 92660

There are 7 attachments

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777

ARIOS, JUSTIN
From: Keith Randle <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 3:44 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Housing Element Subject: Fw: City of Costa Mesa Discrimination against Sober Hosuing and violation of Housing Element Attachments: HVD follow up letter to John Bruenner STATE of Ca._000168.pdf

Keith Randle Broker Associate Villa Real Estate 949.689.8880 Cell 949.698.1288 Office [email protected] BRE # 00993898

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Keith Randle <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021, 03:37:52 PM PDT
Subject: City of Costa Mesa Discrimination against Sober Hosuing and violation of Housing Element

John,
As requested by you I am following you with the synopsis we discussed in detail yesterday.

I have also copied the City of Costa Mesa.

Thanking you in advance for your help on this urgent matter

Keith Randle
Summit Coastal Living
949 689-8880
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788

ARIOS, JUSTIN
From: Anne Paulson <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 11:42 AM
To: Housing Element; [email protected]
Subject: Comments on Costa Mesa's Draft Housing Element Dear Costa Mesa,

Thanks for the opportunity to comment on Costa Mesa's Draft Housing Element. It has virtues, but also flaws.

ADUs

Costa Mesa permitted 10 ADUs a year the last three years. It is predicting 107 a year for the next cycle. Costa Mesa permitted 4 ADUs in 2018, 6 in 2019, and 19 in 2020, an average of 10 a year. They’re predicting 858 a year for the 6th Cycle. Page B-11 of the Housing Element says, “The City of Costa Mesa has determined based on past performance and the SCAG/HCD approved methodology that it is appropriate to anticipate the development of 858 accessory dwelling units from 2021 to 2029.” HCD has not approved a methodology that allows cities to project ten times as many ADUs as they have been permitting.

Residential Development Constraints

Costa Mesa analyzes its residential development standards and concludes that none are constraints on development.

Costa Mesa requires two parking spaces, ~640 square feet, for a studio apartment; a typical studio apartment is around 500-600 square feet. And Costa Mesa claims, without any evidence, that this requirement doesn’t make modest studio apartments financially infeasible.

In other words, Costa Mesa requires more space for parking for a studio apartment than for people living in the apartment, and says that’s not a constraint on building studio apartments. Costa Mesa’s justification is that they’re no worse than other nearby jurisdictions. But those other jurisdictions also are failing to build enough housing.

The neighboring jurisdictions’ residential development standards are burdensome and excessive, and so are Costa Mesa’s.

Site Inventory

Costa Mesa plans most of its new housing on five big nonvacant sites: Fairview Development Center, Sakioka Lot 2, Home Ranch, South Coast Plaza, and Pacific Arts Plaza. The city says the owners have indicated there is the potential for future housing development on each of these sites. However, “potential for future housing development” does not forestall the possibility that these sites might not be redeveloped, or might be redeveloped as something other than housing. The city is required to discount the number of units expected from a non-vacant site, if the site might not be redeveloped for housing. The number of units expected from the big housing sites is inflated, because the city did not discount as it is required to do.

The Draft Housing Element must be revised to deal with these issues.

--
-- Anne Paulson

It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride.
1789
Fighting for a future of abundant housing in Orange County peopleforhousing.org
Ms. Minoo Ashabi, Principal Planner
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
RE: Initial Comments to Draft Housing Element dated August 2021City of Yorba Linda October 13th, 2021
RE: Initial Comments to Draft Housing Element dated August 2021 Dear Ms. Ashabi:

Congratulations on the completion of the 6th Cycle housing element draft. We commend the city for completing its draft early and providing ample time for public comment. In conjunction with the Campaign for Fair Housing Elements, we have reviewed your draft housing element and would like to share the following feedback:
1)
We are concerned about ADU projections that appear overly optimistic: Your housing element anticipates 858 ADUs, which is an estimated 107 per year during the 6th cycle planning period. This seems unrealistic. HCD has described two “safe harbors” for estimating ADU production (p. 31, Housing Element Site Inventory Guidebook). In the ﬁrst safe harbor, the city may use the trend in ADU construction since January 2018; as Costa Mesa permitted 4 ADUs in 2018, 6 in 2019 and 19 in 2020, that trend is about 10 ADUs per year or 80 for the next eight year planning period. For the second safe harbor, the city would use ﬁve times the construction trend prior to 2018. From 2013-2017, Costa Mesa permitted 8 eight ADUs, or about 2 a year. Five times two is 10, so the second safe harbor yields the same result, about 10 ADUs a year. We do not feel that the city adequately justiﬁed a projection of well over ten times the safe harbors.
1 1790
2)
The majority of small sites identiﬁed for aﬀordable housing (that are not part of a larger parcel or development proposal) are in Latino, low income neighborhoods or existing commercial areas. Have you considered opening up other areas for development, particularly near high performing schools? Legislation like SB 9 and SB 10 provides opportunities for inﬁll development in high opportunity communities. Implementing some of these guidelines would go a long way to desegregating housing in Costa Mesa.
3)
The Fairview Developmental Center (FDC) is owned by the state and was included on the last Housing Element, but no housing has been developed. We are not aware of a commitment from the state to developing it as aﬀordable housing.

Assuming that 920 homes of the 2300 proposed (40%) will be low-income aﬀordable is overly optimistic without an agreement in place. According to the Kennedy Commission, 20% low income is a more realistic ﬁgure based on SB 82.

We suggest revising it to reﬂect that input.
4)
We commend the city for seeking out discussions with property owners interested in developing their properties for very-low and low-income housing through the planning period. However, for the remaining sites (for which no interview was conducted), the city says it does not have access to private party lease agreements or other contractual agreements among private parties. Under these circumstances, the safe assumption would be to assume zero likelihood of redevelopment for those sites; however the city does not do that. The assumption is that the sites will turn over even without any evidence to support it. 5)
This lack of analysis, coupled with the uncertainty of the FDC and the development agreements encumbering low-income housing on the other major sites (Sakoika Fighting for a future of abundant housing in Orange County peopleforhousing.org
2 1791
Lot 2, Home Ranch, and Paciﬁc Arts Plaza) leads us to the conclusion that there are insuﬃcient sites for aﬀordable housing. We would advise the city to increase the number sites for low and very low income housing to enable a buﬀer for low income housing. There is currently a suﬃcient buﬀer for moderate and above moderate (market rate). We advise the city to create a buﬀer for low income housing; 15-30% is the HCD-recommended buﬀer.
6)
We take issue with the assumption that the city’s development standards, particularly parking requirements, are not a constraint. Costa Mesa’s parking requirements are onerous. The city requires 2 parking spaces for a studio apartment and 3 parking spaces for a two-bedroom apartment. These are burdensome parking requirements, and are a barrier to reducing the cost of housing, both market-rate and aﬀordable.
7)
Lastly, Measure Y, the requirement that development proposals over 40 units must be approved by voters is the single largest barrier to new housing development in the city. The city is indeed caught in a bind, having to defend a bad policy that inhibits the ability to comply with state law. Therefore we recommend that you take action to explicitly exempt any development project that includes low, very low or extremely low income housing.

Thank you for all of your eﬀorts to create a fair and legally compliant housing element. As frequent attendees in community meetings, we understand the city council has many diﬃcult choices to make with regard to its 6th Cycle Housing Element. We encourage the city council to do what is right, even if it is unpopular, Fighting for a future of abundant housing in Orange County peopleforhousing.org
3 1792
and to develop an exemplary housing element that will comply with both the spirit and letter of state housing element law.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Hansburg
Co-Founder & Director
People for Housing Orange County is a network of housing advocates ﬁghting for more inclusive housing policies in Orange County’s high opportunity communities. By legalizing the construction of multifamily housing, streamlining the permitting of all housing, increasing funding for subsidized aﬀordable housing, we believe a future of abundant housing is possible. We envision an integrated society where every person has access to a safe, aﬀordable home near jobs, services, and opportunity.

Fighting for a future of abundant housing in Orange County peopleforhousing.org
4 1793

ARIOS, JUSTIN
From: Jennifer Hope DesRochers Webster <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 9:41 PM
To: Housing Element
Subject: Feedback: Housing Element Update - Westside overcrowding Feedback: Housing Element Update

Response-Westside Costa Mesa is overwhelmed with too much population. Too many cars. Not enough parking.

People walk a block or more away from home to find parking.

Please implement this information.. dense housing with apartments & Multi family housing are over crowding the Westside. Please reconsider increased housing “outside” district #4 Ie the west side.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Webster
Westside Resident 30 yrs since September 1988

--
Jennifer Hope Webster "To know God and Make Him known. Be filled with love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness and self-control in the power and might of the Fruit of the Holy Spirit" Bible -My purpose statement
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.
1794

ARIOS, JUSTIN
From: Gonzalez Romero, Arysa (TRBL) <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 8:31 AM
To: Housing Element
Subject: City of Costa Mesa 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Greetings,

A records check of the Tribal Historic preservation office’s cultural registry revealed that this project is not located within the Tribe’s Traditional Use Area. Therefore, we defer to the other tribes in the area. This letter shall conclude our consultation efforts.

Thank you,

Arysa Gonzalez Romero, M.S., RPA.

Historic Preservation Technician
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
Tribal Historic Preservation Office
Main (760)-883-1327 | Cell (760)-831-2484

Page 1 of 4 ends

Costa Mesa Affordable Housing Coalition
November 30, 2021
Mr. Paul McDougall
Department of Housing and Community Development
Division of Housing Policy Development
2020 W. El Camino Ave., Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
RE: Summary of Concerns Regarding Costa Mesa’s Housing Element Update Dear Mr. McDougall:

We so appreciate the opportunity to speak with you and Marissa Prasse yesterday regarding Costa Mesa’s draft Housing Element Update (2021-2029). As you may know, the Costa Mesa Affordable Housing Coalition is a local advocacy group which for years has urged Costa Mesa to facilitate the construction of affordable homes for the city’s lower income residents. This letter summarizes the key concerns we articulated in yesterday’s meeting.

First, we applaud the city’s remarkably robust, open, and serious efforts at public engagement in its Housing Element process. We also congratulate the city for its mostly excellent draft Housing Element. We are particularly pleased the draft clearly states Costa Mesa’s commitment to adopting (finally!) an inclusionary zoning ordinance.

Now, the concerns. We have two:
(1) The draft fails to adequately analyze the constraints on affordable housing development specific to each of the four largest sites in the sites inventory, and (2) The draft fails to adequately analyze the paralyzing effect the city’s “Measure Y” will have on affordable housing development.

I.) Inadequate Analysis of the Four Largest Sites
A. The city should provide additional analysis on the Fairview Developmental Center (FDC) site and the implications of SB 82.

The Housing Element identifies FDC as a 109-acre state-owned opportunity site and assumes it can accommodate 2,300 housing units, and that 40% of those future units will be affordable to lower income households (575 very low and 345 low).1 Problematically, however, SB 82 states:
1 Costa Mesa Housing Element, Appendix B Candidate Sites Analysis Overview, October 6, 2021, p. B-15. 1796

Page 2 of 4 ends

“Notwithstanding any other law, the Director of General Services, with the consent of the Director of Developmental Services, may, in the best interests of the state, let to any person or entity real property not exceeding 20 acres located within the grounds of the Fairview Developmental Center for a period not to exceed 55 years, at a price that will permit the development of affordable housing for people with developmental disabilities… A minimum of 20 percent of the housing units developed shall be available and affordable to individuals with developmental disabilities served by a regional center…2”
Given the dictates of SB 82, the city needs to justify its assumption about the number of units possible on the site, as well as its affordability assumption that 40% of the units at FDC will be for lower income. A more realistic affordability assumption for FDC is 20% for lower income. While SB 82 indicates that a minimum of 20% of units will be affordable to individuals with developmental disabilities, there has been no written or public statement from the state expressing interest in making more than 20% of homes affordable to lower income households.

The FDC site holds tremendous potential for meeting the city’s considerable lower income RHNA (4713 units). The fact the site is state-owned, however, could be a significant constraint in developing any housing there within the next eight years, much less the 920 units of lower income housing specified in the sites inventory. The city should create a stand-alone program and commit to actively working with the state to accomplish the specified housing development at FDC anticipated in the sites inventory.

B. The city should provide further analysis on the constraints for the three large sites (Sakioka Lot 2, Home Ranch, and Pacific Arts Plaza) which are currently under development agreements with no affordable housing requirements.

Though these three large sites are in the 2021-2029 sites inventory, they will not be subject to any future inclusionary housing ordinance the city adopts because each site is already under a development agreement with no inclusionary requirement. The only way the owner of one of these sites will be bound by a future inclusionary ordinance is if that owner opts into future General Plan and zoning regulations.3 Absent such a choice to opt into a different governing land use regime, there is no reason to expect any of these property owners will voluntarily include in their respective projects any lower income affordable housing, much less the 15% lower income housing reflected in the sites inventory. Significantly, one of these large property owners has explicitly signaled his unwillingness to be bound by an affordable housing requirement. 2 California Legislative Information, Bill Text SB-82 Developmental Services, June 24, 2015. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB82 3 This fact was confirmed during the city’s consideration of the proposal to extend Sakioka Lot 2’s Development Agreement; the city confirmed that “if the Agreement were extended, and if an inclusionary housing ordinance was adopted along with future General Plan and zoning regulations, the developer would need to comply with the inclusionary housing ordinance IF they opted to develop per the future General Plan and zoning regulations.” (Costa Mesa City Council Agenda Report, An Ordinance for an Extension To And Amendment of the Sakioka Farms Development Agreement, March 18, 2021, p. 11.) 1797

Page 3 of 4 ends

On April 6, 2021, the Costa Mesa City Council extended the expiring Development Agreement for Sakioka Lot 2 for an additional 10 years. Prior to that extension, the city’s Planning Commission recommended the City Council require the extended Development Agreement include affordable housing requirements to help achieve the city’s lower income RHNA goals.4 The property owner, however, was only interested in having Sakioka Lot 2 identified as a housing opportunity site; he was not “amenable” to any affordable housing requirements.5 Given the property owner’s very recent strong opposition to including any affordable housing provisions in the extended Development Agreement, it is unrealistic to assume that same property owner will prioritize the development of housing affordable to lower income households in developing the property.

The city offers no rationale for its expectation the owners of Sakioka Lot 2 and the other two large sites will voluntarily include affordable housing in their future developments.

Importantly, these three large sites are in prime locations near South Coast Plaza, where land values are among the highest in the city. Moreover, each of these three property owners is a longtime owner who has practiced the art of holding onto the land for decades while land values continually climbed upward. Given these facts, the city should analyze the affordability assumptions of “15% lower income” for these three sites in light of each site’s respective development agreement which insulates the site from any affordable housing requirements.

Additionally, it is highly significant Sakioka Lot 2 and Home Ranch have been vacant for decades. How realistic is it that these two sites will be developed in the 2021-2029 cycle? The city must provide that analysis.

Finally, the city should clarify if the affordability assumptions on these three large sites include units that result from a density bonus. For example, the draft indicates that for Sakioka Lot 2, the city “determined that it is realistic to assume that 15% of future units on this site may be available to residents at the lower income levels.”6 Is this 15% actually a density bonus where a developer would be granted a higher density on the proposed development and in exchange, the developer would have to set aside 15% of the units to be affordable? The significance of such a calculation is that the developer may elect to not develop Sakioka Lot 2 to full capacity under the density bonus, and thereby opt out of including any affordable housing.

II.) Inadequate Analysis of Measure Y’s Constraints on Affordable Housing Development Measure Y is Costa Mesa's largest unique constraint to development because it incentivizes less dense, and thus unaffordable, development, and perpetuates exclusionary zoning. The city 4 Costa Mesa City Council Agenda Report, An Ordinance for an Extension To And Amendment of the Sakioka Farms Development Agreement, April 6, 2021, p. 9-10.
5 Costa Mesa City Council Agenda Report, An Ordinance for an Extension To And Amendment of the Sakioka Farms Development Agreement, April 6, 2021, p. 2.
6 Costa Mesa Housing Element, Appendix B Candidate Sites Analysis Overview, October 6, 2021, p. B-12. 1798

Page 4 of 4 ends

council should adopt a policy to exempt from Measure Y any projects approved under the inclusionary zoning ordinance which contribute units toward meeting the city’s extremely low-, very low-, and low-income RHNA requirements.

Thank you for considering our concerns about the draft 2021-2029 Housing Element Update.

For your reference, we are attaching our September letter to the city with more extensive comments on the draft. This letter focuses only on our top concerns.

Sincerely,
Kathy Esfahani
Kathy Esfahani
For The Costa Mesa Affordable Housing Coalition
cc: Minoo Ashabi, Principal Planner of the City of Costa Mesa Richard Walker, Public Law Center
Cesar Covarrubias, The Kennedy Commission
1799

ARIOS, JUSTIN
From: ARIOS, JUSTIN
Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 8:16 AM
To: ARIOS, JUSTIN
Subject: FW: Constraints on Development: Parking
From: Anne Paulson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 7:29 PM
To: PC Public Comments <[email protected]> Subject: Constraints on Development: Parking

Dear Costa Mesa Councilmembers,

I understand you're having a hearing next week concerning constraints that you may be imposing that impede development of housing. I commend you for considering this important issue.

I sent this comment to your Housing Element email in October, but I'm repeating it now, somewhat edited, for consideration in your hearing. Thanks.

Costa Mesa's Parking Requirements are Excessive

In your Draft Housing Element, Costa Mesa analyzes your residential development standards and concludes that none are constraints on development. However, Costa Mesa's parking standards look like they would definitely constrain development. Costa Mesa requires two parking spaces, ~640 square feet, for a studio apartment; a typical studio apartment is around 500-600 square feet.

In other words, Costa Mesa requires more space for parking for a studio apartment than for people living in the apartment, and you say that’s not a constraint on building studio apartments. Costa Mesa’s justification is that you’re no worse than other nearby jurisdictions. But those other jurisdictions also are failing to build enough housing. The neighboring jurisdictions’ residential development standards are burdensome and excessive, and so are Costa Mesa’s.

Parking spaces are very, very expensive to build. An above-ground space will cost around $50-60,000 to build. An underground space will cost around $70-90,000. So the parking alone for that studio apartment will cost upwards of $100,000 to build, well over $150,000 if it's underground. This can be the difference between financial feasibility and financial infeasibility. Moreover, this is an issue of fairness. Costa Mesa has sunny, mild weather, great for biking or e- biking. Yet a person on a limited income, who wants to save money by forgoing a car, or a family that wants to save by just having one car, is still forced to pay for parking they don't want.

Your parking requirements are excessive across the board: 2 parking spaces for a studio apartment, 2.5 for a 1 BR, 3 for a 2 BR, 4 for a 3 BR apartment. In every case, you're requiring as much or more space for the cars as for the people. It's like instead of expecting developers to build apartments for people with attached parking, you're expecting developers to build giant parking lots for cars, with a little attached storage to store humans when they're not in the cars.

Please change these parking requirements. They make no sense, they're unfair, and they constrain development.

Thank you.
--
-- Anne Paulson
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department. 1800

LEGAL ADVOCACY UNIT
350 S. Bixel St., Ste. 290
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Tel: (213) 213-8000
Fax: (213) 213-8001
TTY: (800) 719-5798
Intake Line: (800) 776-5746
www.disabilityrightsca.org

Sent Via Email Only

January 18, 2022

City Council
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
[email protected]

Re: PUBLIC HEARING ITEM #1 - CITY OF COSTA MESA 2021-2029 (SIXTH CYCLE) HOUSING ELEMENT (GP-21-01)
To Mayor John Stephens and the Honorable Members of the City Council:

We are writing to urge the City Council not to approve the draft Housing Element until it is revised to reflect changes that are needed in Costa Mesa’s laws and procedures to reduce barriers to housing for people with disabilities. Disability Rights California is a non-profit agency established under federal law to protect, advocate for and advance the human, legal and service rights of Californians with disabilities.1 Disability Rights California works in partnership with people with disabilities, striving towards a society that values all people and supports their rights to dignity, freedom, choice, and quality of life. Since 1978, Disability Rights California

1 Disability Rights California provides services pursuant to the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 15001, PL 106-402; the Protection and Advocacy for Mentally Ill Individuals Act, 42 U.S.C. § 10801, PL 106-310; the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794e, PL 106-402; the Assistive Technology Act, 29 U.S.C. § 3011,3012, PL 105-394; the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1320b-20, PL 106-170; the Children’s Health Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 300d-53, PL 106-310; and the Help America Vote Act of 2002, 42 U.S.C. § 15461-62, PL 107-252; as well as under California Welfare and Institutions Code §§ 4900 et seq. 1801
DRC Comments on Public Hearing Item #1: Housing Element January 18, 2022

Page 2 of 6 ends

has provided essential legal services to people with disabilities regarding access to housing and other critical needs.

The California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) sent the City a December 3, 2021 letter regarding revisions that the City must make to the draft Housing Element to bring it into compliance with the law. The December 3 letter explained that the City would need to address a number of issues concerning “Housing for People with Disabilities.” However, the revisions to the draft Housing Element before the Council’s consideration today fail to adequately respond to the issues raised by HCD. We write to call particular attention to the following:

1. Reasonable Accommodation

HCD’s December 3, 2021 letter noted that the “additional factors” that the City may consider in its review of a reasonable accommodation application “may act as constraints,” and explained that the draft Housing Element must “include specific analysis of any potential constraint, including considering public comments and add or modify programs as appropriate.” The revisions to the draft Housing Element do not adequately respond to this comment. If an accommodation is necessary to provide people with disabilities full and equal access to housing due to their disabilities, an accommodation must be provided unless the City can demonstrate that doing so would be an undue financial and administrative burden or would be a fundamental alteration of the relevant programs, services, or activities. The same is true if a reasonable accommodation is necessary to provide meaningful access to housing for people with disabilities. The City’s current reasonable accommodation procedures create additional and unnecessary barriers to access because they allow for consideration of additional factors, such as impact on neighbors.

Impact on neighbors, for instance, may only come into the reasonable accommodation analysis if it gives rise to an undue financial and administrative burden on the City, in light of the full resources available to the City, or if it would result in an unavoidable and fundamental alteration to a relevant City program, service, or activity. Otherwise it may not be considered at all, and the City should not be inviting neighbors, who may oppose a reasonable accommodation request due to fear and stereotypes regarding people with disabilities, to weigh in on the request. Moreover, 1802
DRC Comments on Public Hearing Item #1: Housing Element January 18, 2022

Page 3 of 6 ends

the City’s draft Housing Element notes that the City’s current procedure is to consider “the extent to which the City would have to dedicate resources, such as staff time and funds, to grant the request and other requests like it.” Draft HE at 3-33. This is an illegal factor: the City must consider each reasonable accommodation request on its own and may not deny an accommodation request on the grounds that others may make a similar request.

Additionally, Disability Rights California has gained some familiarity with the actual operation of Costa Mesa’s reasonable accommodation process through our representation of an individual plaintiff in the Insight v.

Costa Mesa case, and we have been appalled at what we have learned.

Costa Mesa Zoning Code and practice put the burden on the applicant to demonstrate that a requested accommodation would not be an undue burden or fundamental alteration, which is contrary to law. Moreover, Costa Mesa requires applicants to submit their reasonable accommodation requests to City staff for a purported consideration of their request, but City staff admitted to us in deposition testimony that this is a sham proceeding in the case of group homes seeking a waiver of the City’s 650-foot separation requirement, because the City Council has directed staff never to grant such a request.

The City’s revised Housing Element neither adequately
acknowledges nor responds to these problems, which result in unnecessary and illegal barriers to access for people with disabilities.

2. Definition of Family

HCD’s December 3 letter observed that the City defines “family” as “a single housekeeping unit with multiple restrictions that may act as constraints on housing for persons with disabilities” and explained that the Housing Element “should include specific analysis of any potential constraint, including considering public comment and add or modify programs as appropriate.” However, the revised Housing Element does not do this. The definition ignores the fact that many individuals with disabilities do have a disability-related reason for needing separate leases, or for taking their meals separately, or for keeping expenses separate from other members of the household, or for relying on a third party to 1803
DRC Comments on Public Hearing Item #1: Housing Element January 18, 2022

Page 4 of 6 ends

determine who else lives in the household, for instance. Public benefits programs that people qualify for on the basis of disability, such as housing or income subsidies, for instance, can require things such as separate leases, meals, or finances. People can have a disability-related reason for having separate food. Due to a disability-related impairment, a person may need a third party to organize their housing and determine who else will be living with them. The revised Housing Element does not engage with any of these matters and entirely disregards the constraints that they place on housing options for people with disabilities.

Nor does the Housing Element acknowledge that, as a practical matter, these are only constraints for people with disabilities. The City has no practice of investigating whether blood relatives, or roommates without disabilities, are actually eating meals or doing chores together. The restrictions only become an issue with people with disabilities are living together, because they will be treated as a “group home” if they cannot demonstrate that they are a family/single housekeeping unit.

3. Group Homes

HCD’s December 3 letter accurately observes that the “City’s zoning code appears to isolate and regulate various types of housing for persons with disabilities based on the number of people and other factors.” As noted above, the City does not have “a barrier-free definition of family,” as the December 3 letter explains is required. As a result, the City subjects housing for people with disabilities to onerous regulations and excludes them from some residential zones. And, as the December 3 letter notes, “these housing types in many cases are subject to a special use or conditional use permit, potentially subjecting housing for persons with disabilities to higher discretionary standards where an applicant must demonstrate compatibility with the neighborhood, unlike other residential uses.”

The revised Housing Element does not “include specific analysis of these and any other constraints, including their enforcement and considering public comments, for impacts on housing for persons with disabilities and add or modify programs as appropriate,” as the December 3 letter explains that it should. Instead, the revised Housing Element 1804
DRC Comments on Public Hearing Item #1: Housing Element January 18, 2022

Page 5 of 6 ends

simply argues without evidence that Costa Mesa is justified in imposing these restrictions on housing options for people with disabilities. The revised Housing Element argues that, by limiting housing options for people with disabilities, the City is actually protecting them. But this is nonsensical. Many people have a disability-related reason for needing to live in the kind of housing that Costa Mesa terms a “group home.” Our client in the Insight case, for instance, is a woman with mental health disabilities who needed to live in a supportive environment for a month or two while she transitioned from a psychiatric facility to community living.

Costa Mesa’s group home ordinances restrict the ability of housing providers to create this kind of housing in the community. There are far too few housing options for people with disabilities as it is. And in the case of our client, enforcement of Costa Mesa’s group home ordinances will result in Insight’s housing being shut down, with nowhere else in the City to go.

Because it is the only housing of its kind in the region, people like our client will have nowhere to go for that kind of housing, and will be either stuck in an institution or living in a housing situation that does not provide what they need.

We urge the City Council not to approve the draft Housing Element until it fully responds to these and other barriers to access for people with disabilities.

Sincerely,

Autumn M. Elliott
Litigation Counsel

Zeenat Hassan
Staff Attorney

CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
1805
DRC Comments on Public Hearing Item #1: Housing Element January 18, 2022

Page 6 of 6 ends

[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
February 28, 2022
Policy Recommendations for 6th Cycle Housing Element
Dear Planning staﬀ:

YIMBY Law submits this letter to share our policy goals and recommendations for the Policies and Programs section of your Housing Element. We appreciate the opportunity to participate in the Housing Element process.

The Policies and Programs section of the city’s Housing Element must respond to data, analysis and ﬁndings presented in the Housing Needs section.

We
repeatedly see ﬁndings that housing prices are high, segregation exists, and there is a lack of housing for special populations, but the Policies and Programs don’t respond to these ﬁndings or try to change outcomes. The overview of the city’s housing environment should set the scene, and the policies and programs should explain what the city is going to do to ﬁx it.

Our policy goals are as follows:

Aﬃrmatively Furthering Fair Housing

1. Prioritize rezoning in high resource, historically exclusionary neighborhoods.

Many of the highest resource neighborhoods with the best access to jobs, good schools, and other amenities have histories of exclusion which are still reﬂected in their zoning. Cities should rezone to allow more housing opportunities in those neighborhoods, particularly those with low Vehicle Miles Traveled, as part of their 1 1822
Housing Elements.

2. Establish a strong tenant protection ordinance so that new housing beneﬁts everyone.

Development should not permanently displace
current residents.

Housing replacement programs, temporary housing vouchers, right of return, and demolition controls will create stability for renters while allowing new homes to be built for new households and to accommodate the growth associated with RHNA.

In your sites inventory and rezoning programs, you should prioritize development on sites with owner-occupied housing & commercial uses over those with existing rent-controlled apartments or other rental housing with lower income residents.

3. Support homeownership opportunities for historically excluded groups.

Homeownership continues to be a path to building ﬁnancial security and inter-generational wealth, which has been systematically denied to many Americans. As a society, we need to make this right by intentionally oﬀering opportunities to communities who have been excluded. The housing element should identify opportunities to create a variety of for-sale housing types and create programs to facilitate property ownership among excluded groups.

Site Capacity

4. Adequately plan for density.

Ensure that a site’s
density will accommodate the
number of homes that are projected to be built. In addition, make sure height limits, setback requirements, FAR, and other controls allow for adequate density and the ability to achieve a site’s realistic capacity. Housing will not be feasible if you have a high density paired with low height limits. This density should be emphasized around jobs and transit and should go beyond the Mullin density in those areas.

5. Provide suﬃcient zoned capacity to accommodate all income levels, including a minimum No Net Loss buﬀer of 30%.

Not
every site will be
developed at maximum density during the eight-year planning period. Identify an ample amount of opportunity sites and zone the sites to accommodate lower-income housing types (usually a statutory minimum of 30 dwelling units per acre) to give the city the best chance at meeting its RHNA. 1823

6. Use data from the 5th Cycle to calculate the likelihood of development for your 6th Cycle site inventory.

Likelihood of development
is a measure of the
probability of an inventory site being developed during the planning period. The median likelihood of development across the state is 25%, meaning only one of every four sites will likely be developed during the planning period for the median city. Incorporating the likelihood of development into the zoned capacity will set the city up to successfully achieve their RHNA, making the housing element less of a paper exercise and more of an actionable, functional document.

Accessory Dwelling Units

7. Commit to an automatic mid-cycle adjustment if ADU permitting activity is lower than estimated in the housing element.

We highly
recommend
complying with HCD’s standards of using one of its “safe harbor” methodologies to anticipate future ADU production. However, if the city is optimistic about ADU growth, then creating an automatic mid-cycle adjustment will automatically facilitate alternative housing options (i.e., a rezoning program, removing development constraints, ADU incentives, etc.) if the city falls behind the estimated ADU production.

8. Incentivize new ADUs, including those that are rent-restricted for moderate- or lower-income households or that are prioritized for households with housing choice vouchers.

Consider oﬀering low- or
no-interest loans, forgivable
loans, impact fee waivers for ADUs that are 750 square feet or larger, allowances to facilitate two-story and second-story ADU construction, etc.

Zoning

9. Allow residential to be built in areas that are zoned for commercial use.

There are a myriad of ways to do this, but a housing overlay is one common policy.

Additionally, consider eliminating new commercial space in mixed-use developments where there is not a strong demand or there is otherwise a glut of commercial space that is unused or frequently vacant.

10. Allow ﬂexibility in inclusionary zoning.

Cities should
require diﬀerent
percentages for diﬀerent AMI levels. Additionally, we urge cities to incentivize land 1824
dedication to aﬀordable developers in order for market-rate developers to meet their inclusionary requirements. Avoid getting trapped into thinking that the aﬀordable units must be “sprinkled throughout” the market-rate units, or require the market-rate units to look exactly the same as the aﬀordable ones. This should be balanced against not locating all of the aﬀordable units in one place and ghettoizing neighborhoods by creating or perpetuating racially concentrated areas of poverty.

Better Entitlement Process & Reducing Barriers to Development

11. Ensure that the city has a ministerial process for housing permitting, especially multi-family housing, and remove impact fees for deed-restricted housing.

A discretionary process for housing development
creates uncertainty
and adds to the cost of construction. For example, multi-family housing should not require a conditional use permit or city council approval unless the builder is asking for unique and extraordinary concessions. Right-sizing governmental constraints, entitlement processes, and impact fees will help the city successfully meet its RHNA.

12. Reduce parking standards and eliminate parking minimums.

Minimum
parking requirements are a major constraint on housing, especially for lower cost housing types. They can cost in excess of $30,000 per spot and can raise rents by as much as 17%, and eliminating them is particularly important for smaller & other spatially constrained sites. Consider adopting a parking maximum.

13. Cap fees on all new housing.

Most construction costs
are outside the City’s
control, but reducing impact fees can demonstrate that a city is serious about building new housing. At a minimum, cities should delay the collection of impact fees until the issuance of the certiﬁcate of occupancy to reduce ﬁnancial impacts on new housing and make the units cheaper by not asking the developer to carry impact fee charges or debt throughout the construction phase.

14. Provide local funding.

One of the largest barriers
to building new aﬀordable
homes is the lack of city/county funds available to assemble sites, provide gap funding, and to pay for dedicated staﬀ. Without new funding, especially at the local level, we will not be able to build more aﬀordable homes. There are three 1825
new revenue streams that should be considered: 1)
Transfer tax
, a one-time
payment levied by a jurisdiction on the sale of a home, may be utilized to raise much needed revenue to fund aﬀordable homes; 2)
Vacancy
tax
may be collected
on vacant land to convince landowners to sell their underutilized properties and be used to fund the construction of aﬀordable homes; 3) Commercial linkage
fees should be adopted or revisited for increases on new commercial developments.

We urge you to include these policies in your 6th cycle Housing Element.

Best regards,
Sonja Trauss
Executive Director
YIMBY Law
[email protected]
1826
Costa Mesa Affordable Housing Coalition
February 1, 2022
Mayor John Stephens and Members of the City Council
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA
RE: Measure Y and Complying with Costa Mesa’s RHNA Requirement Dear Mayor Stephens and Council Members:

There are two critical things Costa Mesa must do to comply with its legal obligation to accommodate its 2021-2029 RHNA for lower income households. The first thing is to adopt a strong inclusionary housing ordinance requiring a minimum of 15% of all new homes to be affordable to lower income households. The second is to amend Measure Y so it no longer impedes housing development in Costa Mesa.

Members of the Costa Mesa Affordable Housing Coalition (the Coalition) participated in the City’s well-attended January 11th community meeting on Measure Y. We were very pleased to hear widespread support for amending Measure Y. Many residents who called in during the meeting specifically lamented Costa Mesa’s lack of affordable housing. These same residents expressed the common sense view that Measure Y’s burdensome “city-wide vote” requirement is impeding the construction of new residential development in our city. While a few commenters warned the City not to touch Measure Y, the vast majority of callers supported amending this voter-enacted law so Costa Mesa can gain the affordable housing so many of our residents desperately need.

In my public comments, I suggested the City should amend Measure Y to state that it does not apply to any housing development which includes a minimum percentage of lower-income affordable units. At the time, I urged a 20% requirement for exemption from Measure Y. While 20% would be terrific, our Coalition would also support a 15% lower-income affordable requirement for exemption from Measure Y. Absent such an amendment, Costa Mesa will never meet its lower income RHNA obligation, and its residents will continue to suffer the life- constricting consequences of paying unaffordable rents. We urge you to act.

Thank you for considering our concerns about the draft 2021-2029 Housing Element Update.

Sincerely,
Kathy Esfahani
Kathy Esfahani
For The Costa Mesa Affordable Housing Coalition
1827
cc: Justin Arias, Associate Planner for the City of Costa Mesa Paul McDougal and Marisa Prasse, California Department of Housing and Community Development
Richard Walker, Public Law Center
Cesar Covarrubias, The Kennedy Commission
1828
February 1, 2022
Mayor John Stephens and Members of the City CouncilCity of Costa Mesa77 Fair DriveCosta Mesa, CA 92626 RE:AgendaItem1. CITYOFCOSTA MESA2021-2029(SIXTHCYCLE)HOUSINGELEMENT Dear Honorable Mayor Stephens:

TheKennedyCommission(theCommission)isabroadbasedcoalitionofresidentsandcommunityorganizationsthatadvocatesfortheproductionofhomesaffordableforfamiliesearninglessthan$27,000annuallyin OrangeCounty. Formedin 2001,theCommissionhasbeensuccessfulinpartneringandworkingwithOrangeCountyjurisdictionstocreateeffectivehousingandland-usepolicies that has led to the new construction of homes affordable to lower income working families.

In order to meet its 2021-2029 RHNA goals, the City must adopt an Inclusionary HousingOrdinance with a 15% requirement of affordable housing production at extremely low, very low andlow-income categories. In addition, the City must exempt affordable housing development projects,especially those that include extremely low, very low, and low-income units. Measure Y is theCity’s largest constraint to affordable housing development. By requiring a “city-wide vote”,Measure Y is preventing the devlopment of much needed affordable housing.

Density bonus alone will not develop affordable housing that is needed in the City. The City’s 5thCycle RHNA progress demonstrates that above moderate income housing production has outpacedlower income housing development by a 38 to 1 ratio. The density bonus alone has not beeneffective in producing affordable housing for lower income households. From 2014-2020, only 30permitted units were issued at low and very low income. Of those,only 9 unitsare deed restrictedat very low and 21 units are non-deed restricted ADUs at very low and low income.

We stronglyencouragetheCitytoprioritizethedevelopmentofaffordablehomestobettermeetthehousingneedsoflowincomeresidentsinCostaMesa.TheCommissionhasprovidedthe following recommendations for the City to consider:1. AdoptionofaneffectiveInclusionaryHousingOrdinancewitha15%requirementofaffordablehousingproductionatextremelylow,verylowandlow-incomecategorieswithin the first 2 years of the next planning period.a. TheHousingElementshouldberevisedtocontaina clearcommitmenttoadoptanInclusionaryHousingOrdinancebyOctober2022inordertohaveabeneficial impact in the upcoming planning period.b. TheCitymustadopttheInclusionaryHousingOrdinancepriortoanyzoningchangesor otherlandusechangesthatcouldnegativelyaffectallowableresidential densities needed to meet 2021-2029 RHNA goals. 1829
Kennedy Commission CommentsFebruary 1, 2022

2. TheCitymustmakemid-cycleadjustmentstoprogramstobetterfacilitateaffordablehousingdevelopmentifRHNAgoalsarenotmovingforwardduringthefirsthalfofthe2021-2029planningperiod,especiallyamonglow, verylow, andextremelylowincome.

3. TheCity’s largestconstraintto affordablehousingdevelopmentis MeasureYbecauseitincentivizeslessdenseandthusunaffordabledevelopment.TheCitymustexemptaffordablehousingdevelopmentprojectsespeciallythosethatincludeextremely low, very low, and low-income units.

The Commissionlooksforwardto partneringwiththe Cityto increaseaffordablehomeopportunitiesforlowerincomehouseholdsin theCostaMesa.Pleasekeepusinformedofanyupdatesand meetingsregardingstrategiesto increaseaffordablehomesfor lowerincomehouseholdsintheCity. Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasefeelfreetocontactmeat(949)250-0909or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Cesar CovarrubiasExecutive Director
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
Glossary of Housing Terms
Appendix D
1884

Appendix D: Glossary of Housing Terms D-1
Glossary of Housing Terms
Above-Moderate-Income Household. A household with an annual income usually greater than 120% of the area median family income adjusted by household size, as determined by a survey of incomes conducted by a city or a county, or in the absence of such a survey, based on the latest available legibility limits established by the U.S. Department of housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Section 8 housing program.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH): Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) is a legal requirement that federal agencies and federal grantees further the purposes of the Fair Housing Act. AFFH means "taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws.

Apartment. An apartment is one (1) or more rooms in an apartment house or dwelling occupied or intended or designated for occupancy by one (1) family for sleeping or living purposes and containing one (1) kitchen.

Assisted Housing. Generally multi-family rental housing, but sometimes single-family ownership units, whose construction, financing, sales prices, or rents have been subsidized by federal, state, or local housing programs including, but not limited to Federal state, or local housing programs including, but not limited to Federal Section 8 (new construction, substantial rehabilitation, and loan management set-asides), Federal Sections 213, 236, and 202, Federal Sections 221 (d) (3) (below-market interest rate program), Federal Sections 101 (rent supplement assistance), CDBG, FmHA Sections 515, multi-family mortgage revenue bond programs, local redevelopment and in lieu fee programs, and units developed pursuant to local inclusionary housing and density bonus programs.

Below-Market-Rate (BMR). Any housing unit specifically priced to be sold or rented to low- or moderate- income households for an amount less than the fair-market value of the unit. Both the State of California and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development set standards for determining which households qualify as “low income” or “moderate income.” (2) The financing of housing at less than prevailing interest rates.

Build-Out. That level of urban development characterized by full occupancy of all developable sites in accordance with the General Plan; the maximum level of development envisioned by the General Plan.

Build-out does not assume that each parcel is developed to include all floor area or housing units possible under zoning regulations.
1885

Appendix D: Glossary of Housing Terms D-2
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). A grant program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on a formula basis for entitled communities and administered by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for non-entitled jurisdictions. This grant allots money to cities and counties for housing rehabilitation and community development, including public facilities and economic development.

Condominium. A structure of two or more units, the interior spaces of which are individually owned; the balance of the property (both land and building) is owned in common by the owners of the individual units. (See “Townhouse.”)
Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). A term used to describe restrictive limitations that may be placed on property and its use, and which usually are made a condition of holding title or lease.

Deed. A legal document which affects the transfer of ownership of real estate from the seller to the buyer.

Density Bonus. The allocation of development rights that allow a parcel to accommodate additional square footage or additional residential units beyond the maximum for which the parcel is zoned, usually in exchange for the provision or preservation of an amenity at the same site or at another location.

Density, Residential. The number of permanent residential dwelling units per acre of land. Densities specified in the General Plan may be expressed in units per gross acre or per net developable acre.

Developable Land. Land that is suitable as a location for structures and that can be developed free of hazards to, and without disruption of, or significant impact on, natural resource areas.

Down Payment. Money paid by a buyer from his own funds, as opposed to that portion of the purchase price which is financed.

Duplex. A detached building under single ownership that is designed for occupation as the residence of two families living independently of each other.

Dwelling Unit (DU). A building or portion of a building containing one or more rooms, designed for, or used by one family for living or sleeping purposes, and having a separate bathroom and only one kitchen or kitchenette. See Housing Unit.

Elderly Housing. Typically, one- and two-bedroom apartments or condominiums designed to meet the needs of persons 62 years of age and older or, if more than 150 units, persons 55 years of age and older, and restricted to occupancy by them.

Emergency Shelter. A facility that provides immediate and short-term housing and supplemental services for the homeless. Shelters come in many sizes, but an optimum size is considered to be 20 to 40 beds.

Supplemental services may include food, counseling, and access to other social programs. (See “Homeless” and “Transitional Housing.”)
1886

Appendix D: Glossary of Housing Terms D-3
Extremely Low-Income Household. A household with an annual income equal to or less than 30% of the area median family income adjusted by household size, as determined by a survey of incomes conducted by a city or a county, or in the absence of such a survey, based on the latest available eligibility limits established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Section 8 housing program.

Fair Market Rent. The rent, including utility allowances, determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for purposed of administering the Section 8 Program.

Family. (1) Two or more persons related by birth, marriage, or adoption [U.S. Bureau of the Census]. (2) An Individual or a group of persons living together who constitute a bona fide single-family housekeeping unit in a dwelling unit, not including a fraternity, sorority, club, or other group of persons occupying a hotel, lodging house or institution of any kind [Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines].

General Plan. A comprehensive, long-term plan mandated by State Planning Law for the physical development of a city or county and any land outside its boundaries which, in its judgment, bears relation to its planning. The plan shall consist of seven required elements: land use, circulation, open space, conservation, housing, safety, and noise. The plan must include a statement of development policies and a diagram or diagrams illustrating the policies.

Goal. A general, overall, and ultimate purpose, aim, or end toward which the City will direct effort.

Green Building. Green or sustainable building is the practice of creating healthier and more resource- efficient models of construction, renovation, operation, maintenance, and demolition. (US Environmental Protection Agency)
Historic Preservation. The preservation of historically significant structures and neighborhoods until such time as, and in order to facilitate, restoration and rehabilitation of the building(s) to a former condition.

Historic Property. A historic property is a structure or site that has significant historic, architectural, or cultural value.

Household. All those persons—related or unrelated—who occupy a single housing unit. (See “Family.”) Housing and Community Development Department (HCD). The State agency that has principal responsibility for assessing, planning for, and assisting communities to meet the needs of low-and moderate-income households.

Housing Element. One of the seven State-mandated elements of a local general plan, it assesses the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community, identifies potential sites adequate to provide the amount and kind of housing needed, and contains adopted goals, policies, and 1887

Appendix D: Glossary of Housing Terms D-4
implementation programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. Under State law, Housing Elements must be updated every five years.

Housing Payment. For ownership housing, this is defined as the mortgage payment, property taxes, insurance, and utilities. For rental housing this is defined as rent and utilities.

Housing Ratio. The ratio of the monthly housing payment to total gross monthly income; also called Payment-to-Income Ratio or Front-End Ratio.

Housing Unit. The place of permanent or customary abode of a person or family. A housing unit may be a single-family dwelling, a multi-family dwelling, a condominium, a modular home, a mobile home, a cooperative, or any other residential unit considered real property under State law.

Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of (HUD). A cabinet-level department of the federal government that administers housing and community development programs.

Implementing Policies. The City’s statements of its commitments to consistent actions.

Implementation. Actions, procedures, programs, or techniques that carry out policies.

Infill Development. The development of new housing or other buildings on scattered vacant lots in a built- up area or on new building parcels created by permitted lot splits.

Jobs-Housing Balance. A ratio used to describe the adequacy of the housing supply within a defined area to meet the needs of persons working within the same area. The General Plan uses SCAG’s definition which is a job total equal to 1.2 times the number of housing units within the area under consideration.

Land Use Classification. A system for classifying and designating the appropriate use of properties.

Live-Work Units. Buildings or spaces within buildings that are used jointly for commercial and residential purposes where the residential use of the space is secondary or accessory to the primary use as a place of work.

Low-Income Household. A household with an annual income usually no greater than51%-80% of the area median family income adjusted by household size, as determined by a survey of incomes conducted by a city or a county, or in the absence of such a survey, based on the latest available eligibility limits established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Section 8 housing program.

Low-income Housing Tax Credits. Tax reductions provided by the federal and State governments for investors in housing for low-income households.

Manufactured Housing. Residential structures that are constructed entirely in the factory, and which since June 15, 1976, have been regulated by the federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards 1888

Appendix D: Glossary of Housing Terms D-5
Act of 1974 under the administration of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (See “Mobile home” and “Modular Unit.”)
Mixed-Use. Properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with significant functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design. A “single site” may include contiguous properties.

Moderate-Income Household. A household with an annual income usually no greater than 81%-120% of the area median family income adjusted by household size, as determined by a survey of incomes conducted by a city or a county, or in the absence of such a survey, based on the latest available eligibility limits established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Section 8 housing program.

Monthly Housing Expense. Total principal, interest, taxes, and insurance paid by the borrower on a monthly basis. Used with gross income to determine affordability.

Multiple Family Building. A detached building designed and used exclusively as a dwelling by three or more families occupying separate suites.

Ordinance. A law or regulation set forth and adopted by a governmental authority, usually a city or county.

Overcrowded Housing Unit. A housing unit in which the members of the household, or group are prevented from the enjoyment of privacy because of small room size and housing size. The U.S. Bureau of Census defines an overcrowded housing unit as one which is occupied by more than one person per room.

Parcel. A lot or tract of land.

Planning Area. The area directly addressed by the general plan. A city’s planning area typically encompasses the city limits and potentially annexable land within its sphere of influence.

Policy. A specific statement of principle or of guiding actions that implies clear commitment but is not mandatory. A general direction that a governmental agency sets to follow, in order to meet its objectives before undertaking an action program. (See “Program.”)
Poverty Level. As used by the U.S. Census, families and unrelated individuals are classified as being above or below the poverty level based on a poverty index that provides a range of income cutoffs or “poverty thresholds” varying by size of family, number of children, and age of householder. The income cutoffs are updated each year to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index.

Program. An action, activity, or strategy carried out in response to adopted policy to achieve a specific goal or objective. Policies and programs establish the “who,” “how” and “when” for carrying out the “what” and “where” of goals and objectives.
1889

Appendix D: Glossary of Housing Terms D-6
Redevelop. To demolish existing buildings; or to increase the overall floor area existing on a property; or both; irrespective of whether a change occurs in land use.

Regional. Pertaining to activities or economies at a scale greater than that of a single jurisdiction and affecting a broad geographic area.

Regional Housing Needs Assessment. A quantification by the local council of governments of existing and projected housing need, by household income group, for all localities within a region.

Rehabilitation. The repair, preservation, and/or improvement of substandard housing.

Residential. Land designated in the General Plan and zoning ordinance for building consisting of dwelling units. May be improved, vacant, or unimproved. (See “Dwelling Unit.”) Residential Care Facility. A facility that provides 24-hour care and supervision to its residents.

Residential, Multiple Family. Usually three or more dwelling units on a single site, which may be in the same or separate buildings.

Residential, Single-Family. A single dwelling unit on a building site.

Retrofit. To add materials and/or devices to an existing building or system to improve its operation, safety, or efficiency. Buildings have been retrofitted to use solar energy and to strengthen their ability to withstand earthquakes, for example.

Rezoning. An amendment to the map to effect a change in the nature, density, or intensity of uses allowed in a zoning district and/or on a designated parcel or land area.

Second Unit. A self-contained living unit, either attached to or detached from, and in addition to, the primary residential unit on a single lot. “Granny Flat” is one type of second unit.

Section 8 Rental Assistance Program. A federal (HUD) rent-subsidy program that is one of the main sources of federal housing assistance for low-income households. The program operates by providing “housing assistance payments” to owners, developers, and public housing agencies to make up the difference between the “Fair Market Rent” of a unit (set by HUD) and the household’s contribution toward the rent, which is calculated at 30% of the household’s adjusted gross monthly income (GMI). “Section 8” includes programs for new construction, existing housing, and substantial or moderate housing rehabilitation.

Shared Living Facility. The occupancy of a dwelling unit by persons of more than one family in order to reduce housing expenses and provide social contact, mutual support, and assistance. Shared living facilities serving six or fewer persons are permitted in all residential districts by Section 1566.3 of the California Health and Safety Code.
1890

Appendix D: Glossary of Housing Terms D-7
Single-Family Dwelling, Attached. A dwelling unit occupied or intended for occupancy by only one household that is structurally connected with at least one other such dwelling unit. (See “Townhouse.”) Single-Family Dwelling, Detached. A dwelling unit occupied or intended for occupancy by only one household that is structurally independent from any other such dwelling unit or structure intended for residential or other use. (See “Family.”)
Single Room Occupancy (SRO). A single room, typically 80-250 square feet, with a sink and closet, but which requires the occupant to share a communal bathroom, shower, and kitchen.

Subsidize. To assist by payment of a sum of money or by the granting to terms or favors that reduces the need for monetary expenditures. Housing subsidies may take the forms or mortgage interest deductions or tax credits from federal and/or state income taxes, sale, or lease at less than market value of land to be used for the construction of housing, payments to supplement a minimum affordable rent, and the like.

Substandard Housing. Residential dwellings that, because of their physical condition, do not provide safe and sanitary housing.

Supportive Housing. Housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 53260(d), and that is linked to onsite or offsite services that assist the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. “Target population" means adults with low incomes having one or more disabilities, including mental illness, HIV or AIDS, substance abuse, or other chronic health conditions, or individuals eligible for services provided under the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act and may, among other populations, include families with children, elderly persons, young adults aging out of the foster care system, individuals exiting from institutional settings, veterans, or homeless people. [California Health and Safety Code Sections 50675.14(b) and 53260(d)]
Target Areas. Specifically, designated sections of the community where loans and grants are made to bring about a specific outcome, such as the rehabilitation of housing affordable by Very-Low and Low-income households.

Tax Increment. Additional tax revenues that result from increases in property values within a redevelopment area. State law permits the tax increment to be earmarked for redevelopment purposes but requires at least 20 percent to be used to increase and improve the community’s supply of very low- and low-income housing.

Tenure. A housing unit is owner-occupied if the owner or co-owner lives in the unit, even if it is mortgaged or not fully paid for. A cooperative or condominium unit is owner-occupied only if the owner or co-owner lives in it. All other occupied units are classified as renter-occupied including units rented for cash rent and those occupied without payment of cash rent.
1891

Appendix D: Glossary of Housing Terms D-8
Townhouse. A townhouse is a dwelling unit located in a group of three (3) or more attached dwelling units with no dwelling unit located above or below another and with each dwelling unit having its own exterior entrance.

Transitional Housing. Shelter provided to the homeless for an extended period, often as long as 18 months, and generally integrated with other social services and counseling programs to assist in the transition to self-sufficiency through the acquisition of a stable income and permanent housing. (See “Homeless” and “Emergency Shelter.”)
Undevelopable. Specific areas where topographic, geologic, and/or superficial soil conditions indicate a significant danger to future occupants and a liability to the City.

1892

Appendix D: Glossary of Housing Terms D-9
Acronyms Used
ACS: American Community Survey
BMPs: Best Management Practices
CALTRANS: California Department of Transportation
CEQA: California Environmental Quality Act
CHAS: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
CIP: Capital Improvement Program
DDS: Department of Developmental Services
DIF: Development Impact Fee
DU/AC: Dwelling Units Per Acre
EDD: California Employment Development Department
FAR: Floor Area Ratio
FEMA: Federal Emergency Management Agency
HCD: Department of Housing and Community Development
HOA: Homeowners Association
HUD: Department of Housing and Urban Development
LAFCO: Local Agency Formation Commission
MFI: Median Family Income
NPDES: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
RTFH: Regional Task Force on the Homeless
RTP: Regional Transportation Plan
SCAG: Southern California Association of Governments
SPA: Sectional Planning Area
STF: Summary Tape File (U.S. Census)
TOD: Transit-Oriented Development
TDM: Transportation Demand Management
TSM: Transportation Systems Management
WCP: Water Conservation Plan

1893
ATTACHMENT 2
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 1 of 7

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-xx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

COSTA MESA FOR THE APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 21-01, CITY OF COSTA MESA 2 021-2029
(SIXTH CYCLE) HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE, AS

REVISED PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSIN G AND COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY FINDS AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa adopted the General Plan’s Fifth Cycle Housing Element on January 21, 2014;
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65358(a) authorizes the City Council to amend the General Plan if it is deemed to be in the public interest; WHEREAS, the General Plan is a long -range, comprehensive document that serves as a guide for the orderly development of the City of Costa Mesa; WHEREAS, by its very nature, the General Plan is subject to update and revision to account for current and future community needs;
WHEREAS, the Housing Element is one of the seven State -mandated General Plan chapters or “elements” and is a component of the City of Co sta Mesa 2015 -2035 General Plan;
WHEREAS, California State Housing Element Law establishes the requirements for Housing Elements, and California Government Code Section 65588 requires that local governments review and revise the Housing Element of their comprehensive General Plans not less than once every eight years. Additionally, t he California Legislature identifies overall housing goals for the State with the goal of ensuring every resident has access to housing and a suitable living environment;
WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa has been assigned an allocation of 11,760 new housing units as its share of the regional housing need assessment (RHNA) in Southern California;

1894
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 2 of 7
WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa has completed extensive public outreach that included c onducting two City -wide Townhall meetings on November 18, 2020 and September 2, 2021, hosting outreach meetings for each of the City’s six voting districts on February 17, 2021 and February 18, 2021, a special study session with the Planning Commission was held on March 1, 2021 and with the City Council on March 23, 2021, and on April 27, 2021 and September 13, 2021, the City Council and Planning Commission held joint public study sessions;
WHEREAS, the Housing Element update must be adopted by City Council and certified by California State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), and t he Planning Commission is required to make a recommendation regarding the Housing Element update prior to City Council adoption and HCD certification; WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared for the Housing Element Update in compliance with CEQA and the local environmental review guidelines and reviewed by the Planning Commission;
WHEREAS, the IS/MND were circulated for the required 30-day public review period from October 29, 2021, to November 29, 2021;
WHEREAS, the final adoption of the IS/MND along with the associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is subject to City Council discretion as the final approval authority, after consideration of the Planning Commission recommendation and public comments received during the public review period; WHEREAS, the IS/MND and MMRP reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Costa Mesa;
WHEREAS, the public review draft Housing Element was circulated for public comment between August 17, 2021 and September 15, 2021; WHEREAS, On October 6, 2021, the Draft Housing Element Update was sent to the HCD for review and comment, and on December 3, 2021, the Department of HCD forwarded the State’s review comments regarding the 2021-2029 Draft Housing Element update;

1895
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 3 of 7
WHEREAS, duly-noticed public hearings were held by the Planning Commission for the review of the Draft Housing Element update on November 8, 2021, November 22, 2021 and December 13, 2021;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its December 13, 2021 meeting reviewed the Draft Housing Element update that included revisions based on the State’s review comments and after considering public input recommended by a 6-1 vote that the City Council approve the Housing Element update and associated IS/MND; WHEREAS, a duly-noticed public hearing was held by the City Council for the review of the Draft Housing Element update on January 18, 2022, public comments were considered by the City Council , and the City Council continued the item to the February 1, 2022 City Council meeting;
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing, considered the Planning Commission recommendation and public comments, and at the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council , by a vote of 6 -1, adopted Resolution No. 2022 -06 that approves and adopts the IS/MND, MMRP and approved General Plan Amendment 21 -01 for the City of Costa Mesa 2021 -2029 (Sixth Cycle) Housing Element Update;
WHEREAS, on February 4, 2022, the City of Costa Mesa re-submitted the adopted 2021-2029 Housing Element to the HCD for review and certification; WHEREAS, on April 5, 2022, HCD provided to the City of Costa Mesa a report of its review that includes advisement of further revision to the adopted 2021-2029 Housing Element;
WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa revised the previously adopted 2021 -2029 Housing Element to address the HCD response letter, which is attached to this Resolution as Attachment 1;
WHEREAS, seven days prior to the City Council meeting, the City of Costa Mesa posted on the City’s website the revised 2021-2029 Housing Element for public review; WHEREAS, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162(a)(1-3), the City of Costa Mesa as the lead agency has determined that none of the proposed revisions based on the HCD comments to the Housing Element require subsequent environmental analysis;
1896
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 4 of 7
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, the C ity Council held a duly noticed public hearing, considered public comments and considered approval of the revised 2021-2029 Housing Element and Resolution 2022-XX to overrule the March 17, 2022 Orange County Airport Land Use Commission’s determination that the City’s 2021 -2029 Sixth Cycle Housing Element is inconsistent with the 2008 John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:

Section 1. The City has considered the findings, comments and recommendations set forth in HCD’s letter dated April 5, 2022 which determined that the City’s 2021-2029 Housing Element, adopted February 1, 2022, required revisions to comply with State Housing Element Law;
Section 2 . The City has revised the adopted 2021 -2029 Housing Element as recommended by HCD and General Plan Amendment 21 -01, 2021-2029 (Sixth Cycle) Housing Element, as revised, is attached to this Resolution as Attachment 1; Section 3. The 2021-2029 (Sixth Cycle) Housing Element , as revised, sets forth the housing policies for the City, facilitates the preservation and development of housing, and establishes programs to accommodate the City’s share of the regional housing need.

Section 4. In accordance with Government Code Section 65583, the City finds that the City’s Sixth Cycle (2021-2029) Housing Element, as revised, complies with the duty to affirmatively further fair housing.

Section 5. The City finds that the Sixth Cycle (2021-2029) Housing Element, as revised, complies with the requirements of State law.

Section 6. The City finds that based on a variety of factors including the increasing demand for housing in the Southern California region , development trends, property owner interest, structure age, property valuation, and development capacity, as well the likelihood of the City’s commercial area zoning standards, specific plans and urban plans along commercial corridors and otherwise being m odified to include greater housing opportunities based on the Housing Programs included in the City’s Sixth Cycle 2021 - 2029 Housing Element Update which will facilitate commercial uses on non-vacant sites converting to mixed -use and/or residential developments; together with recent regional 1897
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 5 of 7
development trends (where conversion of non -residential uses on non -vacant sites to housing developments to accommodate a range of household types including lower income households has been prevalent); the documented int erest from housing developers to construct housing projects in the City of Costa Mesa; and the existing uses on the sites identified in the Housing Element sites inventory to accommodate the RHNA including the lower income RHNA are likely to be integrated with new residential uses, or discontinued during the planning period; and therefore are not considered significant impediments to additional residential development during the period covered by the City’s Sixth Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element Update;
Section 7. The City adopted Resolution 2022 -xx on November 15, 2022 that overruled the ALUC determination that the Costa Mesa 2021-2029 Sixth Cycle Housing Element is inconsistent with the AELUP and made appropriate findings that the Housing Element is consistent with the purpose of the article stated in Public Utilities Code Section 21670. The findings are included as Exhibit “A” as attached to the November 15, 2022 Resolution for overrule. P ursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 2 1676, the ALUC and the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics provided comments to the City regarding the City’s proposed decision and findings to overrule the ALUC determination , and the City made these comments part of the public record to overrule the ALUC determination as required pursuant to the Public Utilities Code.

Section 8. The City Council considered public comments received during the public review period and determined that no new environmental documentation pur suant to CEQA is required because (a) all potentially significant effects of the proposed project have been adequately analyzed in an earlier IS/MND adopted on February 1, 2022 pursuant to applicable legal standards, (b) all potentially significant effect s of the proposed project have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier IS/MND, (c) the proposed project will not result in any new significant environmental effects not identified in the earlier IS/MND, (d) the proposed project will not substantially increase the severity of the environmental effects identified in the earlier IS/MND, (e) no considerably different mitigation measures have been identified, and (f) no mitigation measures found infeasible have become feasible;
1898
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 6 of 7
Section 9. The City Council hereby approves and adopts General Plan Amendment 21-01, 2021-2029 (Sixth Cycle) Housing Element, as revised, which updates the previously-approved City-adopted Fifth Cycle Housing Element , attached hereto as Attachment 1.

Section 10. Pursuant to State housing element law, the City Council hereby authorizes the Director of Economic and Development Services to submit the adopted 2021-2029 (Sixth Cycle) Housing Element, as revised, to the HCD for State certification.

Section 11. The Director of Economic and Development Services of the City of Costa Mesa is authorized to make minor non-substantive modifications to the Housing Element as necessary to make it internally consistent or address additional comments from HCD as part of the Housing Element certification process. 1899
ATTACHMENT 2
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 7 of 7

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2022.

__________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________ _____________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 2022-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa held on the 15th day of November, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this ___day of _____, 2022.

________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

1900
ATTACHMENT 3
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 1 of 7

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-xx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

COSTA MESA TO OVERRULE THE ORANGE COUNTY
AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION’S DETERMINATION
THAT THE CITY OF COSTA MESA’S 2021 -2029 SIXTH

CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT IS INCONSISTENT WITH

THE JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT ENVIRONS LAND USE
PLAN

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY FINDS AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 653 58(a) authorizes the City Council to amend the General Plan if it is deemed to be in the public interest; WHEREAS, the General Plan is a long -range, comprehensive document that serves as a guide for the orderly development of the City of Costa Mesa; WHEREAS, by its very nature, the General Plan is subject to update and revision to account for current and future community needs;
WHEREAS, the Housing Element is one of the seven State -mandated General Plan chapters or “elements” and is a component of the City of Costa Mesa 2015 -2035 General Plan;
WHEREAS, California State Housing Element Law establishes the requirements for Housing Elements, and California Government Code Section 65588 requires that local governments review and revise the Housing Element of their comprehensive General Plans not less than once every eight years. Additionally, the California Legislature identifies overall housing goals for the State with the goal of ensuring every resident has access to housing and a suitable living environment;
WHEREAS, after the City of Costa Mesa completed extensive public outreach that included c onducting two City -wide Townhall meetings on November 18, 2020 and September 2, 2021, hosting outreach meetings for each of the City’s six voting districts on February 17, 2021 and February 18, 2021, a special study session with the Planning Commission was held on March 1, 2021 and with the City Council on March 23, 2021, and on April 27, 2021 and September 13, 2021, the City Council and Planning Commission held joint public study sessions;
1901
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 2 of 7

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the 2021-2029 Sixth Cycle Housing Element at its regular meetings on November 8, 2021, November 22, 2021 and December 13, 2021 and, following consideration of public comments, recommended City Council approval by a 7-0 vote;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa reviewed and considered the 2021-2029 Sixth Cycle Housing Element on January 18, 2022 and February 1, 2022, and following consideration of public comments, adopted the Housing Element by a 6-1 vote on February 1, 2022;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa re-reviewed and considered edits to the 2021-2029 Sixth Cycle Housing Element based on HCD comments, and following consideration of public comments, adopted the Housing Element by a x-x vote on November 15, 2022;
WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code Section 21676(b) requires the City of Costa Mesa to refer an amendment of the C ity’s general plan or specific plan, or the adoption or approval of a zoning ordinance or building regulation within the planni ng boundary established by the Airport Land Use C ommission (ALUC) pursuant to Section 21675 to the ALUC for their consideration.

WHEREAS, at a duly -noticed public hearing on March 17, 2022, the ALUC reviewed City of Costa Mesa’s 2021 -2029 Sixth Cycle Housing Element and found the proposed General Plan Housing Element Amendment to be inconsistent with the AELUP by a 4-0 vote;
WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa does not waive any objection to and/or right to challenge any failure by the ALUC or the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics to proceed in the manner required by law, including but not limited to, Public Utilities Code Sections 21670 through 21679.5, related to the above referenced March 17, 2022, finding of inconsistency.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Utilities Code Sections 21670 and 21676, the City of Costa Mesa may, after a public hearing, propose to overrule the ALUC by a two-thirds vote of the City Council, if the City of Costa Mesa makes specific findings that the proposed project is consistent with the purpose of Section 21670; 1902
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 3 of 7

WHEREAS, at a duly-noticed public hearing on April 5, 2022, the Costa Mesa City Council took action to adopt Resolution No. 2022 -19 that included specific findings that the 2021-2029 Sixth Cycle Housing Element is consistent with the purpose of the article stated in Section 21670 of the Public Utilities Code by a 6-0 vote; WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 21676, on April 11, 2022, the City of Costa Mesa provided the ALUC and the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics the City’s proposed decision to overrule the ALUC determination and specific findings that the 2021- 2029 Sixth Cycle Housing Element is consistent with the purpose of the article stated in Section 21670;
WHEREAS, pursuant t o Public Utilities Code Section 21676, the ALUC and the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics can and did provide comments regarding the City’s proposed decision and findings to overrule the ALUC determination; WHEREAS, pursuant t o Public Utilities Code Section 21676, the ALUC and the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics comments regarding the City’s proposed decision and findings to overrule the ALUC determination are advisory to the City , and the City must include these comments on the public record prior to a final decision to overrule the ALUC determination;
WHEREAS, the City has considered the ALUC and the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics comments regarding the City’s proposed decision and findings to overrule the ALUC determination and these comments have been made as part of the public record of the City Council final decision to overrule the ALUC determination; NOW, THEREFORE, the Costa Mesa City Council DOES HEREBY RESOLVE to overrule the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission Determination that the 2021 - 2029 Sixth Cycle Housing Element is inconsistent with the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council DOES HEREBY MAKE the findings that the 2021-2029 Sixth Cycle Housing Element is consistent with the purpose of the article stated in Section 21670 of the Public Utilities Code, as shown in Exhibit “A”, FINDINGS.

1903
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 4 of 7

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2022.

__________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________ _____________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this ___day of _____, 2022.

________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

1904
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 5 of 7

EXHIBIT “A”

FINDINGS

The Costa Mesa City Council makes the following findings pursuant to Section 21670 of the Public Utilities Code as follows:

A. Finding No. 1: It is in the public interest to provide for the orderly development of each public use airport in this state and the area surrounding these airports so as to promote the overall goals and objectives of the California airport noise standards adopted pursuant to Section 21669 and to prevent the creation of new noise and safety problems.

Justification for finding: The March 17, 2022 ALUC inconsistency determination did not identify conce rns with noise in regard to the City’s Housing Element update. To the contrary, the ALUC determination indicated that the City’s candidate housing sites are appropriately located outside of airport noise contours of concern and further the City's General Plan Noise Element address es potential applicable residential noise impacts in General Plan Noise Element Policies N-1.1, N-1.5, N-1.6, N-2.4 and N-2.6. Specifically, the ALUC recognized that the City’s Noise Element Policy N -2.6 requires an “interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL be enforced for any new residential project,” which is consistent with the ALUC residential noise standards. Therefore, the City is justified to make the finding to overrule the ALUC inconsistency determination in regard to PUC Finding No. 1.

B. Finding No. 2: (2) It is the purpose of this article to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses.

Justification for finding: As indicated in the above section entitled “Justification for finding,” the City ’s Noise Element Policies adequately address the public exposure to excessive noise.
1905
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 6 of 7

In addition, at the March 17, 2022 ALUC hearing, the ALUC determined that that the City’s existing maximum building height provisions were inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for ni ne candidate housing sites located in two geographic areas of the City .

According to the ALUC staff report, the City’s existing North Costa Mesa Specific Plan provisions permit a maximum building height that could potentially result in building construction that exceeds the 206 -foot John Wayne Airport Imaginary Horizontal Su rface. However, the City’s Housing Element update does not grant any entitlements, change any land use standards or authorize any development beyond what is allowed under the City’s current General Plan and Zoning Code (including the maximum building height identified inconsistent by the ALUC). Therefore, the ALUC’s determination of inconsistency is not based on proposed polices of the Housing Element update but rather existing height standards in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan.

In addition, both ALUC staff and at least one of the Commissioners during the public hearing recognized that the data used for calculating maximum building height elevation was likely not accurate (Google is the data source used to establish existing ground topography). Using imprecise and unreliable data is problematic in this situation as the ALUC determination for three candidate housing sites is based on discrepancies of only three to five feet. As such, this identified inconsistency is likely not inconsistent and can be ad dressed pending actual topographical data either at the time of the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan update or when an actual project is proposed, which will require additional ALUC review.

Lastly, the remaining six candidate housing sites that the ALUC determined were inconsistent were previously reviewed in 2006 and 2007 by the ALUC.

In 2007, the City submitted a project for ALUC consideration that included a mixed-use development with both hotel and residential uses (referred to as the Wyndham Hotel and High Rise Residential Project) in the South Coast Plaza Town Center area . This area already contains Plaza Tower and Center Tower which exceed 20 stories. The project included a General Plan Amendment, a Specific Plan Amendment, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), a Final Master Plan and a proposed subdivision. The ALUC determined that the project and the General Plan/Specific Plan amendments were inconsistent in regard to the inclusion of height standards that penetrate the AELUP horizontal imaginary sur face, and the City subsequently overruled the ALUC determination. The City’s overrule finding was based on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) findings that the then proposed building height of 304 feet Area Mean Sea Level (AMSL) “would not adversely affect air safety” and the FAA subsequently issued a “no hazard determination.” Additionally, the FAA conditioned that any future buildings proposed in this area with height proposed above 173 1906
Resolution No. 2022-xx Page 7 of 7

feet above grade level would require a specific determination of “no hazard” by the FAA in order to move forward. This requirement is included in the height standards of the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan applicable to the candidate housing sites in question. Therefore, potential safety risks associated with future construction on these six candidate housing sites are addressed by the FAA requirement and the Specific Plan requirements and the City’s Housing Element Update. Therefore, the City is justified to make the finding to overrule the ALUC inconsistency determin ation in regard to PUC Finding No. 2.

1907
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
(916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453
www.hcd.ca.gov
April 5,
2022
Lori Ann F
arrell Harrison, City Manager
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Dear Lori A
nn Farrell Harrison:

RE: City
of Costa Mesa’s 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Adopted Housing Element Thank you for
submitting the City of Costa Mesa’s (City) housing element adopted on February 2, 2022 and received for review on February 4, 2022. Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (h), the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is reporting the results of its review. In addition, HCD considered comments from Disability Rights California, Costa Mesa Affordable Housing Coalition, Kennedy Commission, Nsight and Californians for Homeownership pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (c).

The adopt
ed element addresses many statutory requirements described in HCD’s prior December 3, 2022 review; however, revisions will be necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Gov. Code). The enclosed Appendix describes the revisions needed to comply with State Housing Element Law.

As a rem
inder, the City’s 6th cycle housing element was due October 15, 2021. As of today, the City has not completed the housing element process for the 6th cycle. The City’s 5th cycle housing element no longer satisfies statutory requirements. HCD encourages the City to revise the element as described above, adopt, and submit to HCD to regain housing element compliance.

For your i
nformation, pursuant to Assembly Bill 1398 (Chapter 358, Statutes of 2021), if a local government fails to adopt a compliant housing element within 120 days of this statutory deadline, then any rezoning to accommodate the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA), including for lower-income households, shall be completed no later than one year from the statutory deadline. Otherwise, the local government’s housing element will no longer comply with State Housing Element Law, and HCD may revoke its finding of substantial compliance pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (i).

ATTACHMENT 4
-1-
1908
Lori Ann Farrell Harrison, City Manager

Page 2 ends

P
ublic participation in the development, adoption and implementation of the housing element is essential to effective housing planning. Throughout the housing element process, the City should continue to engage the community, including organizations that represent lower-income and special needs households, by making information regularly available and considering and incorporating comments where appropriate.

S
everal federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criteria. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill (SB) 1 Sustainable Communities grant; the Strategic Growth Council and HCD’s Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities programs; and HCD’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation consider housing element compliance and/or annual reporting requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65400. With a compliant housing element, the City will meet housing element requirements for these and other funding sources.

H
CD appreciates the hard work and dedication Jennifer Le, Scott Drapkin and the rest of the City’s housing element team provided during the review. We are committed to assisting the City in addressing all statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law. If you have any questions or need assistance, please contact me at [email protected].

S
incerely,
P
aul McDougall
Senior Program Manager
E
nclosure
-2-
1909
C
ity of Costa Mesa’s 6th Cycle Adopted Housing Element Page 1 April 5, 2022

APPENDIX

CITY OF COSTA MESA
T
he following changes are necessary to bring the City’s housing element into compliance with Article 10.6 of the Government Code. Accompanying each recommended change, we cite the supporting section of the Government Code.

H
ousing element technical assistance information is available on HCD’s website at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/housing-element-memos.shtml.

Among other resources, the housing element section contains HCD’s latest technical assistance tool, Building Blocks for Effective Housing Elements (Building Blocks), available at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-devel
opment/building-blocks/index.shtml and includes the
Government Code addressing State Housing Element Law and other resources.

A. Housing Needs, Resources, and Constraints

1. A
ffirmatively further[ing] fair housing in accordance with Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8899.50) of Division 1 of Title 2…shall include an assessment of fair housing in the jurisdiction. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(10)(A).) W
hile the element includes a general summary of outreach and includes some additional data related to disparities in access to opportunity, it largely was not revised to address HCD’s findings related to the following:
• E
nforcement
• Integration and Segregation (please see finding related to income and persons with disabilities)
• Racial/Ethnic Areas of Concentration of Poverty (R/ECAP) and Areas of Affluence (RCAA)
• Disproportionate Housing Need including Displacement Risk (please see finding related to overpayment, overcrowding, housing conditions and homelessness) • Local Data and Knowledge, and Other Relevant Factors
• Goals, Actions, Metrics, and Milestones
P
lease see HCD’s prior review which details the necessary revisions.

2. Include an analysis of population and employment trends and documentation of pr
ojections and a quantification of the locality's existing and projected needs for all income levels, including extremely low-income households. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(1).) I
nclude an analysis and documentation of household characteristics, including level of paym
ent compared to ability to pay, housing characteristics, including overcrowding, and housing stock condition. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(2).) -3-
1910

City of Costa Mesa’s 6th Cycle Adopted Housing Element Page 2 April 5, 2022
Extremely Low-i ncome (ELI) Households: While the element includes some analysis of the existing housing needs of ELI households, it must still identify the projected housing need for ELI households as describe in HCD’s prior review.

Housing Conditions: The element describes the age of the housing stock and incl udes
some information on code enforcement. However, the element must still include an estimate of the number of units in need of rehabilitation and replacement. This analysis could address housing conditions at a neighborhood or area level to address requirements related to the assessment of fair housing (See above). Please see HCD’s prior review for additional information.

3. An inventory of land suitable and available for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having realistic and demonstrated potential for redevelopment during the planning period to meet the locality’s housing need for a designated income level, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these sites. (Gov.

Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(3).)

Suitability of Nonvacant Sites: W
hile the element includes some additional information on development potential based on existing versus allowable intensities and a brief housing market analysis, it must still provide supporting information to demonstrate the similarity between redevelopment trends and identified sites. Please see HCD’s prior review for additional information.

I
n addition, as noted in the prior review, because the housing element relies upon nonvacant sites to accommodate more than 50 percent of the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) for lower-income households, it must demonstrate existing uses are not an impediment to additional residential development and will likely discontinue in the planning period. (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (g)(2).) Absent findings (e.g., adoption resolution) based on substantial evidence, the existing uses will be presumed to impede additional residential development and will not be utilized toward demonstrating adequate sites to accommodate the RHNA. Based on a cursory review of the adoption resolution (Resolution Number 2022-06), findings were not made regarding existing uses. Future re- adoption of the housing element must contain the appropriate findings. HCD will provide samples under separate cover.

Small Sites:

The element includes some analysis of small sites and the potential for consolidation and notes Policy 2.10 in the land use element of the general plan. However, Policy 2.10 appears oriented toward single family lots and does not provide clear mechanisms for promoting lot consolidation. As a result, the element should include a program with specific commitment and timing to establish incentives and promote lot consolidation, including outreach with property owners.

Large Sites: S
ites larger than ten acres in size are deemed inadequate to accommodate housing for lower-income households unless it is demonstrated, with sufficient evidence, that sites are suitable to accommodate housing for lower-income households. For example, typical developments with units affordable to lower income households consist of 50 to 150 units. Several sites identified far exceed this typical range. HCD’s prior review found the element should demonstrate the potential for larger sites to be developed as -4-
1911

City of Costa Mesa’s 6th Cycle Adopted Housing Element Page 3 April 5, 2022
assumed in the planning period, including affordability. In response, the element now describes expressed interest in developing housing in the planning period and absence of explicit caps on affordability. However, the element should still describe how these larger sites facilitate affordability in the planning period, particularly given typical ranges for affordable developments. Further, the element must include a program to facilitate the assumed affordability on larger sites and, similar to Program 3B (Fairview Development Center), should consider alternative actions if the sites are not developed in the planning period as assumed, especially related to affordability.

Environmental Constraints: While the element now g
enerally describes potential
environmental constraints related to fire and flooding, it must still describe any other known environmental or other conditions that could impact housing development on identified sites in the planning period.

Accessory Dwelling Un
its (ADUs): HCD’s prior review found the element should reconcile 2020 numbers with HCD’s records (19 ADUs) and rescale assumptions based on permitted units and other relevant factors and add or modify programs as appropriate. In response, the element now assumes 70 ADUs per year (adjusted from over 100 ADUs per year). However, these adjusted assumptions are not supported by analysis and programs.

First, the element must still reconcile 2020 numbers (27 ADUs) with HCD records.

Second, recent trends (20 ADUs per year since 2018) do not support a four-fold increase.

While the element notes the uptick (41 ADUs in 2021), it should rescale assumptions to a more appropriate number around 40 to 50 ADUs per year.

Electronic Site Inventory: As noted in the prior review, pursuant to Government Code section 65583.3, subdivision (b), the City must utilize standards, forms, and definitions adopted by HCD when preparing the sites inventory and submit an electronic version of the sites inventory. While the City has submitted an electronic version of the sites inventory, if changes occur, any future re-adopted versions of the element must also submit the electronic version of the sites inventory.

Zoning for a Variety of Housing Types:

• Emergency Shelters: The element now includes some discussion related to available acreage and proximity to transportation and services; but it should still clarify emergency shelters are permitted without discretionary action; discuss the presence of reuse opportunities; and analyze any conditions inappropriate for human habitation.
• Permanent Supportive Housing: The element was not revised to address this finding. Please see HCD’s prior review for additional information.

4. An analysis of potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels, including the types of housing identified in paragraph (1) of subdivision (c), and for persons with disabilities as identified in the analysis pursuant to paragraph (7), including land use controls, building codes and their enforcement, site improvements, fees and other exactions required of developers, and local processing and permit procedures... (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(5).)
-5-
1912

City of Costa Mesa’s 6th Cycle Adopted Housing Element Page 4 April 5, 2022

Processing and P
ermit Procedures: The element now describes approval bodies for various entitlements and indicates typical multifamily developments are subject to Planning Commission approval. In addition, as noted in the prior review, the analysis should address the typical number of public hearings, approval findings and any other relevant information. The analysis should address impacts on housing cost, supply, timing and approval certainty.

Housing for Persons with Disabilities:

• Reasonable Accommodation: HCD’s prior review found the City’s reasonable accommodation procedure contains potential constraints. For example, while HCD agrees that local actions must be consistent with the general plan, the purpose of the procedure is to provide exception in land use, including the general plan, so persons with disabilities can enjoy access to housing. Further, the housing element, including provisions for reasonable accommodation and obligations to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH), are also part of the general plan. In response, the element does not appear to agree the procedure contains constraints but commits (Program 2N) to review and revise the ordinance to comply with state and federal fair housing laws, which casts uncertainty on what will be revised. As a result, Program 2N should be revised to provide certainty and specific commitment to revise the ordinance and ensure a process that promotes housing access for persons with disabilities. For example, the Program could commit to revise the procedure with parameters on what will be achieved through revisions such as promoting access to housing for persons with disabilities, addressing constraints such as approval findings and establishing objective standards (e.g., health and safety) and guidance to promote certainty on how approval findings will be implemented.
• Definition of Family: HCD’s prior review found the zoning code defines single housekeeping unit with multiple restrictions that may act as constraints on housing for persons with disabilities. In response, the element concludes the definition of family and single housekeeping unit do not touch on whether members are with a disability and is not intended to discriminate against persons with disabilities. However, the element provides no analysis to support this conclusion and should include a program to address the constraint. Please see HCD’s prior review for additional information. • Group Homes: The element includes various conclusions and statements about the City’s zoning code and group homes, but it still must analyze the exclusion of these housing types from some residential zones and use permit and other requirements, including enforcement as constraints on housing for persons with disabilities and add or modify programs as appropriate. Based on a complete analysis, the element should add or modify program. Please see HCD’s prior review for additional information.

B H
ousing Programs

1. Include a program which sets forth a schedule of actions during the planning period, each with a timeline for implementation, which may recognize that certain programs are ongoing, such that there will be beneficial impacts of the programs within the planning period, that the local government is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the Housing Element through the -6-
1913

City of Costa Mesa’s 6th Cycle Adopted Housing Element Page 5 April 5, 2022
administration of land use and development controls, the provision of regulatory c
oncessions and incentives, and the utilization of appropriate federal and state financing and subsidy programs when available. The program shall include an identification of the agencies and officials responsible for the implementation of the various actions. (Gov.

Code, § 65583, subd. (c).)

A
s noted in the prior review, to have a beneficial impact in the planning period and address the goals of the housing element, programs must be revised with discrete timelines and specific commitment. In response to add discrete timelines, the element, for several actions, now commits to review or evaluate programs annually. However, an annual review does not result in a beneficial impact or a housing outcome. Programs should have specific commitment with discrete timing to achieve a housing outcome in the planning period. For example, Program 1A (Owner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation) should at least annually market information on the program, describe when the City will evaluate effectiveness and make adjustments and could commit to process a target number of applications per year. Please see HCD’s prior review for additional programs to be revised.

2. Identify actions that will be taken to make sites available during the planning period with appropriate zoning and development standards and with services and facilities to accommodate that portion of the city’s or county’s share of the regional housing need for each income level that could not be accommodated on sites identified in the inventory completed pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) without rezoning, and to comply with the requirements of Government Code section 65584.09. Sites shall be identified as needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including multifamily rental housing, factory-built housing, mobilehomes, housing for agricultural employees, supportive housing, single-room occupancy units, emergency shelters, and transitional housing. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(1).)

A
s noted in Finding A3, the element does not include a complete site analysis; therefore, the adequacy of sites and zoning were not established. Based on the results of a complete sites inventory and analysis, the City may need to add or revise programs to address a shortfall of sites or zoning available to encourage a variety of housing types. In addition, the element should be revised as follows:

• S
hortfall of Adequate Sites: As noted in the prior review, programs to rezone sites and accommodate a shortfall of adequate sites (3C and 3D) must be revised to address all requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65583.2, subdivisions (h) and (i) and commit to allowable densities, minimum acreage to be rezoned, number of shortfall units and amending any caps on residential development. In response, the element now states rezoning is not necessary to accommodate a shortfall of adequate sites. However, the element does not demonstrate how this conclusion is derived. The element should either demonstrate how adequate sites are demonstrated based on existing zoning, including development standards or revise programs as described in HCD’s prior review. • Program 3B (Fairview Development Center): While the Program now commits to negotiate an agreement and alternative actions, it should also commit to facilitate development as appropriate, including zoning, incentives, expedited processing and -7-
1914

City of Costa Mesa’s 6th Cycle Adopted Housing Element Page 6 April 5, 2022
similar actions and include timing for when alternative actions will be completed if necessary.
• Lar ge and Small Sites: As noted in Finding A3, programs should be added or modified to ensure availability and affordability of development in the planning period as anticipated in the sites inventory.

3. T he housing element shall contain programs which assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate-income households. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(2).)

ELI Households: Program 2L is now revised to subsidize processing fees when funding is available and promote the benefits of the program. However, the Program should also commit to additional actions to assist in the development of housing for ELI households. The Program should commit to proactively reach out to developers at least annually and ongoing to identify development opportunities, adopt priority processing and streamlined review, grant concessions and incentives and assist, support or pursue funding applications at least annually and ongoing throughout the planning period.

4. Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, including housing for all income levels and housing for persons with disabilities.

The program shall remove constraints to, and provide reasonable accommodations for housing designed for, intended for occupancy by, or with supportive services for, persons with disabilities. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(3).)

A
s noted in Findings A4, the element requires a complete analysis of potential governmental constraints. Depending upon the results of that analysis, the City may need to revise or add programs and address and remove or mitigate any identified constraints.

In addition, Program 3G now includes a specific schedule of actions to, among other things, engage the community, propose a ballot measure, adopt an inclusionary ordinance (exempting affordable housing proposals) and prepare planning amendments to meet the RHNA. However, the Program should also commit to adopt the various planning amendments, alternative actions if the appropriate zoning is not complete and provide parameters that the ballot measure or other actions will be undertaken to address this fundamental constraint to housing development (in addition to RHNA requirements).

5. Promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities and promote housing throughout the community or communities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability, and other characteristics... (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(5).)

A
s noted in Finding A1, the element requires a complete analysis of AFFH. Depending upon the results of that analysis, the City must revise or add programs. -8-
1915
ATTACHMENT 5
-1-
1916
-2-
1917
-3-
1918
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”

DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS
P.O. BOX 94274, MS–40 | SACRAMENTO, CA 9427 4–0001
(916) 879-6596 | FAX (916) 653-9531 TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
J
une 7, 2022
M
r. Scott Drapkin
Assistant Director, Development Services
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
D
ear Mr. Drapkin:

T
hank you for including the California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans), Division of Aeronautics (Division) in the overrule process for the above- referenced project. California Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 21676 (http:www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html), requires Caltrans to review the specific findings a local government intends to use when proposing to overrule an Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). Specifically, the findings are examined to determine whether they are consistent with the purposes of the statutes as set forth in the State Aeronautics Act (SAA) per PUC Se ction 21670 et seq.

S
ection 21670(a) outlines five separate purposes for the legislation as follows:
• “
…to provide for the orderly development of each public use airport in this state…”
• “
…to provide for the orderly development of…the area surrounding these airports so as to promote the overall goals and objectives of the California airport noise standards…”
• “
…to provide for the orderly development of…the area surrounding these airports so as…to prevent the creation of new noise and safety problems. ” • “
…to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports…”
• “
…to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by…the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety -4-
1919
Mr. Scott Drapkin
June 7, 2022

Page 2 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses.”
Ad
ditionally, the SAA identifies the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook (Handbook) to provide guidance for conducti ng airport land use compatibility planning as required by PUC Sections 21670 -21579.5
S
imply stated, the findings must show evidence that the city is minimizing the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports .

T
he proposed project, the City of Costa Mesa 2021 -2029 6th Cycle Housing Element was reviewed by the Orange County ALUC (OCALUC) to determine whether the action is consistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP). The ALUC staff report specifically described four AELUP consistency review areas for the Housing Element update: 1) Aircraft Noise Impacts, 2) Aircraft Height Restrictions, 3) Flight Tracks and Safety Zones, and 4) Heliports. The Orange County ALUC staff recommended a rule for incon sistency pursuant to AELUP Sections 2.1.3, 2.1.4 and PUC Section 21674.

O
ur review of the materials provided indicates the prime issue of inconsistency lies in the City’s blueprint for future potential actions that are needed to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Analysis allocation and comply with State Housing Element law. In accordance with Housing Element law, the City will process General Plan, Zoning Code and Specific Plan amendments, which would be subject to ALUC review. The City contends the Housing Element update does not in and of itself include any changes to local land use standards, including height restrictions, location, or number of housing units.

T
he City asserts specific findings to justify this overrule.

Finding No.
1: “…the City’s candidate housing sites are appropriately located outside of airport noise contours of concern and further the City's General Plan Noise Element addresses potential applicable residential noise impacts in General Plan Noise Element Policies N- 1.1, N-1.5, N-1.6, N-2.4 and N-2.6.” H
owever, this finding is not consistent with planning regulations in the Government Code, to wit:
-5-
1920
Mr. Scott Drapkin
June 7, 2022

Page 3 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” Government Code 65583
(a) An assessment of housing needs and an inventory of resources and constraints relevant to the meeting of these needs. The assessment and inventory shall include all of the following:
(
2) A local government may disapprove a housing development described in paragraph (1) if it makes written findings supported by substantial evidence on the record that both of the following conditions exist:
(
A) The housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety unless t he project is disapproved or approved upon the condition that the project be developed at a lower density. As used in this paragraph, a “specific, adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, ident ified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.
(
B) There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact identified pursuant to paragraph (1), other than the disapproval of the housing development project or the approval of the project upon the condition that it be developed at a lower density.
(
3) The applicant or any interested person may bring an action to enforce this subdivision. If a court finds that the local agency disapproved a project or conditioned its approval in violation of this subdivision, the court shall issue an order or judgment compelling compliance within 60 days. The court shall retain jurisdiction to ensure that its order or judgment is carried out. If the court determines that its order or judgment has not been carried out within 60 days, the court may issue further orders to ensure that the purposes and policies of this subdivision are fulfilled.

In any such action, the city, county, or city and county shall bear the burden of proof.

G
overnment Code 65302
(3) The noise contours shall be used as a guide for establishing a pattern of land uses in the land use element that minimizes the exposure of community residents to excessive noise.
(
h) (1) An environmental justice element, or related goals, policies, and objectives integrated in other elements, that identifies disadvantaged communities within the area covered by the general plan of the city, county, or city and county, if the city, county, or city and county has a disadvantaged community. The environmental -6-
1921
Mr. Scott Drapkin
June 7, 2022

Page 4 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” justice element, or related environmental justice goals, policies, and objectives integrated in other elements, shall do all of the following:
(
A) Identify objectives and policies to reduce the unique or compounded health risks in disadvantaged communities by means that include, but are not limited to, the reduction of pollution exposure, including the improvement of air quality, and the promotion of publ ic facilities, food access, safe and sanitary homes, and physical activity.

I
n addition, SB 1000, chaptered in 2016, requires local governments to identify environmental justice communities (called “disadvantaged communities”) in their jurisdictions and a ddress environmental justice in their general plans. This new law has several purposes, including to facilitate transparency and public engagement in local governments’ planning and decision- making processes, reduce harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in environmental justice communities, and promote equitable access to health- inducing benefits, such as healthy food options, housing, public facilities, and recreation.

Finding No.
2: “…the City’s Housing Element update does not grant any entitlements, change any land use standards or authorize any development beyond what is allowed under the City’s current General Plan and Zoning Code…” T
he City believes that the proposed recommendation to submit future permits is premature based on Public Utilities Code Section 21676.5(a), which states:
“I
f the commission finds that a local agency has not revised its general plan or specific plan or overruled the commission by a two -thirds vote of its governing body after making specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes of this article as stated in Section 21670, the commission may require that the local agency submit all subsequent actions, regulations, and permits to the commission for review until its general plan or specific plan is revised or the specific findings are made .”
As the Housing Element is a mandatory part of the General Plan and requires an amendment to the General Plan, it falls under the same review requirements for determining consistency.

C
alifornia courts have supported the ALUC review of General Plans in Watsonville Pilots Assoc. v. City of Watsonville (April 12, 2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1059. The City must conform to the State Aeronautics Act (SAA, Public Utilities Code Section 21670 et seq.) in its approach to planning areas adjoining the airport. -7-
1922
Mr. Scott Drapkin
June 7, 2022

Page 5 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” The SAA is intended to protect public safety by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards in areas around public airports. According to the Court, the Handbook is a guide for counties with an ALUC; must be relied upon relative to height, use, safety, and density criteria by alternative procedure counties; and in the case of Watsonville, the city must adopt in its General Plan noise and safety criteria that are consistent with the criteria in the Handbook. The Court opined that “we can see nothing in the statutory language that indicates that the Legislature intended to grant discretion to an affected city ... to decide which of the Handbook’s criteria should be incorporated into such a city’s general plan. ” As a result, Watsonville’s 2030 General Plan, which conflicted with the Handbook’s restrictions on land uses near airports, was therefore invalid.

The Division has reviewed the proposed findings provided by the City and has determined the findings are insufficient to warrant this proposed overrule.

Specifically, the findings are not consistent with the purposes of the statutes set forth in the California Public Utilities Code (PUC) section 21670. These findings do not provide substantial evidence that the proposed Project will meet the requirements of PUC statutes set forth in PUC section 21670. These findings do not provide substantial evidence that the proposed Project will meet the requirements of PUC, section 21670(a) (1) and (2).

Based on the information provided by both the City and the OCALUC, the Division does not agree with the City’s findings.

The Division strongly recommends not approving this overrule due to significant safety risks and potential noise incompatibility. Please note the PUC reference below, which mandates that local agencies shall be guided by the height, use, noise, safety, and density criteria as established in the Handbook:

California Public Utilities Code, section 21674.7 (b):

It is the intent of the Legislature to discourage inc ompatible land uses near existing airports. Therefore, prior to granting permits for the renovation or remodeling of an existing building, structure, or facility, and before the construction of a new building, it is the intent of the Legislature that local agencies shall be guided by the height, use, noise, safety, and density criteria that are compatible with airport operations, as established by this article, and referred to as the Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, published by the Division.

It must be understood that protecting people and property on the ground from the potential consequences of near -airport aircraft accidents is a fundamental land use -8-
1923
Mr. Scott Drapkin
June 7, 2022

Page 6 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” compatibility-planning objective. While the chance of an aircraft injuring someone on the ground is historically quite low, an aircraft accident is a high consequence event. To protect people and property on the ground from the risks of near -airport aircraft accidents, some form of restrictions on land use is essential.

The John Wayne Airport is a vital part of the air transportation system and is an economic asset with its 350,000 operations and 10.7 million commercial passengers in 2019. The airport will continue to increase commercial and air cargo service at John Wayne Airport, and we commend the efforts of the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission in making careful and reasoned decisions in attempting to ensure compatible land uses in the vicinity of the Airport.

Although the need for compatible and safe land uses near airports in California is both a local and State issue, airport staff, airport land use commission and airport land use compatibility plans are key to protecting an airport and the people residing, working and recreating in the vicinity of an airport. Consideration given to the issue of compatible land uses within an airport’s environs should help to relieve future conflicts between airports and their neighbors.

As a reminder, pursuant to PUC 21676, et seq., the local agency governing body shall include comments from the OCALUC and the Division in the final record of any final decision to overrule the commission.

Please note: The Division comments are to be inclu ded in the public record of any decision to overrule the OCALUC.

These comments reflect the areas of concern to the Caltrans’s Division of Aeronautics. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this project.

If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (916) 654 -5203.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey L. Spencer
Associate Transportation Planner
Division of Aeronautics
Office of Planning

c: Lea Choum, Executive Officer, Orange County Airport Land Use Commission Matt Friedman, Chief, Office of Aviation Planning, Division of Aeronautics -9-
1924
City Responses to Comments

Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) May 10, 2022 Comments ALUC Comment for purpose Finding No. 1 (direct quote from ALUC letter provided below):

City response to ALUC comment to purpose Finding No. 1:

The ALUC comments responded to the City that the ALUC “inconsistency finding was not based on noise standards.” However, the ALUC comments further indicated that they appreciate that the City’s Noise Element addresses potential airport noise impacts and requires an interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL to be enforced for any new residential project. Therefore, the Housing Element is consistent with the “purpose” outlined in PUC Section 21670.

ALUC comment for purpose Finding No. 2 (direct quote from letter provided below):

(continued)
-10-
1925

City response to ALUC comment to purpose Finding No. 2:

The ALUC comment letter indicates that in regard to PUC Finding No. 2, their “
inconsistency finding was based on the safety hazards created by changing the land use from commercial/mixed use to residential high rise building in close proximity to John Wayne Airport. The ALUC finding of inconsistency specifically pertains to proposed housing sites located within the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan area. As indicated by the ALUC comment, t he PUC Purpose Finding No. 2 clearly references “the protection of public health, safety and welfare”; however, this finding in complete context also specifies “to minimize the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses” [emphasis added]. As indicated in the “City Council adopted Justification for purpose Finding No 2”, the area of the housing sites that the ALUC determined wer e “incompatible” are located in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan area which is approved (“devoted”) for a hotel/residential development project of 304 feet. At the time this project was approved, the City processed an ALUC overrule with findings based on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) determination that the proposed building height of 304 feet “would not adversely affect air safety” and the FAA subsequently issued a “no hazard determination.” Additionally, this area is currently developed with the “Plaza Tower” and “Center Tower” buildings which both exceed 20 stories. Since this area, as determined by the ALUC, is already “devoted” with similar “incompatible uses”, purpose Finding No. 2 is not applicable to the subject housing sites pursuant to the PUC provisions . Therefore, the proposed justification to overrule the ALUC determination for purpose Findings No. 2 is appropriate, and the Housing Element is consistent with the “purpose” outlined in PUC Section 21670.

-11-
1926
Caltrans Division of Aeronautics June 7, 2022 Comments
Caltrans comment for purpose Finding No. 1 (direct quote from letter provided below):

(continued)

-12-
1927

City response to Caltrans comment to purpose Finding No. 1:

In regard to Finding No. 1, the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics ( Caltrans) responded that the City’s findings are “not consistent with the planning regulations in the Government Code.” Specifically, the Caltran s’ comments reference the California Land Use provisions relating to “Housing Elements” (Section 65583) and the “Authority for the Scope of General Plans” (Section 65302). However, neither of these provisions are specified for compliance in the PUC provisions relating to the “overrule” process, and therefore are not applicable. Finding No. 1 is specifically related to “noise” and , as confirmed by the ALUC , the City’s Noise Element addresses potential airport noise impacts and requires an interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL to be enforced for any new residential project.

Therefore, the Housing Element is consistent with the “purpose” outlined in PUC Section 21670.

Caltrans comment for purpose Finding No. 2 (direct quote from letter provided below):

(continued)

-13-
1928

City Response to Caltrans comment to Finding No. 2:

In regard to Finding No. 2, the Division responded that the purpose of the Division’s review of the City’s ALUC Determination overrule findings is to “determine whether they are consistent with the purpose of the statutes as set forth in the State Aeronautics Act (SAA) per PUC Section 21670.” The Division comments, similar to the above ALUCs comments, cites the PUC provision related to safety and noise hazards around public airports. As previously indicated, the area of the housing sites that the ALUC determined were “incompatible” in regard to safety are located in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan area which is entitled for a hotel/residential development project of 304 feet. At the time of approval of this project , the City processed an ALUC overrule with findings based on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) determination that the proposed building height of 304 feet “would not adversely affect air safety” and the FAA subsequently issued a “no hazard determination.” Additionally, this area is currently developed with the Plaza Tower and Center Tower which exceed 20 stories. Since this area, as determined by the ALUC, is already “devoted” with similar “incompatible uses”, Finding No. 2 is not applicable to the subject housing sites. Therefore, the proposed justification to overrule the ALUC determination for purpose Findings No. 2 is appropriate, and the Housing Element is consistent with the “purpose” outlined in PUC Section 21670.
-14-
1929
City of Costa Mesa
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 22-930 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
TITLE:

APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO CITYWIDE RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WITH MERCY

HOUSE FUNDED BY THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA)
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
PRESENTED BY: NATE ROBBINS, NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT MANAGER CONTACT INFORMATION: LORI KARAGUEZIAN, SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST, (714) 593-5347
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve proposed Amendment No. 3 (Attachment 1) to the Subrecipient Agreement (SRA) with Mercy House Living Centers increasing the compensation by $500,000 and authorize the appropriation of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for program administration for the City’s ARPA Rental Assistance Program for lower-income households.

2. Authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute all agreements and any amendments to the agreements.

BACKGROUND:

Since March 2020, the COVID-19 Pandemic has had significant economic impacts on communities.

Programs designed to provide a safety net for residents have been necessary to mitigate the related impacts pertaining to food, housing, and income insecurity.

The City’s response to the COVID-19 Pandemic included Citywide Rental Assistance programs funded initially with both CDBG-CV and HOME funding sources. As of this time, all CDBG-CV Rental Assistance funds have been exhausted, and HOME Rental Assistance funds are the only remaining funds available for households with minor children in need of rental assistance and are fully contracted with the non-profit service provider Families Forward.

The program ensures that governments have the resources needed to:
• Fight the pandemic and support families and businesses struggling with its public health and

Page 1 of 4 ends

1930
File #: 22-930 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
• Fight the pandemic and support families and businesses struggling with its public health and economic impacts,
• Maintain vital public services, amid declines in revenue, and • Build a strong, resilient, and equitable recovery by making investments that support long-term growth and opportunity.

The City of Costa Mesa was allocated ARPA-SLFRF funds of $26,481,093, of which 50% was received and expended in FY2020-21 primarily for small business grants and to offset revenue losses and finance increased costs resulting from the pandemic. The other 50% was received in FY2021-22. ARPA-SLFRF eligible use for housing assistance includes development of affordable housing and rental assistance to needy families.

At the June 21, 2022 City Council meeting, the Council approved an appropriation of $500,000 in American Rescue Plan Act funds to augment the City’sHUD-funded Rental Assistance Programs to continue offering much-needed assistance to Costa Mesa renters.

Community Development Block Grant Coronavirus (CDBG-CV) The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act of 2020 (the “CaresAct”)provided $5 billion in Community Development Block Grant Coronavirus funding (“CDBG-CV”)to assist low-income and vulnerable Americans impacted by the Coronavirus pandemic. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”)allocated $2 billion of these funds to eligible jurisdictions by using the existing CDBG grant formula. The CDBG-CV program is a COVID 19 resource that was approved as a substantial amendment to the FY 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan and is not a recurring source of funding.

City Council accepted round one of CDBG-CV funds on May 26, 2020 in the amount of $668,658 and round two of CDBG-CV funds on October 9, 2020 in the amount of $1,168,216 for a total of $1,836,874 in CDBG-CV funds awarded to the City. Of this amount, a total of $905,000 was allocated for rental assistance. As of this date, the rental assistance funds have been completely expended.

HOME Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA)
The HOME TBRA Pilot Program was initiated as part of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan process with an initial allocation of $150,000 for the program in FY 2020-2021. Families Forward was selected as the subrecipient administrator for the program in November 2020 and was subsequently allocated an additional $150,000 in November 2021 for a total allocation of $300,000 for the TBRA program. The agreement with Families Forward will soon expire but can be extended as needed to close out the final expenditure of all funds.

ANALYSIS:

Mercy House is a local 501(c)(3) organization and has over thirty (30) years of experience providing services to homeless and at-risk households. Over the past two years, Mercy House was awarded and has successfully administered $392,633 in CDBG-CV Rental Assistance funds to keep forty- three (43) at-risk households in their homes, in addition to their operation of the City’sPermanent

Page 2 of 4 ends

1931
File #: 22-930 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
Bridge Shelter.

The CDBG-CV Rental Assistance funds awarded to Mercy House were allocated specifically for assisting individuals and/or households without minor children. However, those funds have been totally expended. The proposed award of $500,000 in ARPA Rental Assistance funds will be used by Mercy House to assist both individuals and families, as outlined in the Scope of Work (Attachment 2).

Below are some highlights of the new ARPA Rental Assistance Program:

PURPOSE
· To provide Costa Mesa households with financial assistance to maintain housing at-risk of being lost or secure permanent housing for those experiencing homelessness.

ELIGIBILITY
· All Costa Mesa residents earning at or below 50% of the Area Median Income (AMI), or $67,750 for a family of four, are eligible to apply.

APPLICATION PROCESS
· Mercy House will have two English/Spanish-speaking staff dedicated to supporting interested households in completing and submitting a Program application. · At launch, Mercy House will host a Rental Assistance Application Workshop where members of the community can receive real-time assistance to complete and submit a Program application.

ASSISTANCE
· The Program will provide a maximum of six (6) months of rental assistance with no cap on the amount of assistance.
· The Program can provide up to six (6) months of rental arrears, which do not count toward the maximum of six (6) months of prospective rental assistance. · While enrolled in the Program, no household will pay more than 30% of their adjusted gross income toward rent.

TERM
· Mercy House projects to expend all funds by December 31, 2023.

PROJECTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
· Over the Program term, Mercy house projects to assist approximately 54 households with rental assistance and associated services.

Page 3 of 4 ends

1932
File #: 22-930 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
ALTERNATIVES:

This item is administrative in nature.

FISCAL REVIEW:

Upon approval by City Council, ARPA funds in the amount of $500,000 will be appropriated for this program.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney’s office has reviewed this report and approved it as to form.

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following City Council Goal:
· Diversify, Stabilize and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve proposed Amendment No. 3 (Attachment 1) to the Subrecipient Agreement (SRA) with Mercy House Living Centers increasing the compensation by $500,000, and authorize the appropriation of ARPA funds for program administration for the City’sARPA Rental Assistance Program for lower-income households.

2. Authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute all agreements and any amendments to the agreements.

Page 4 of 4 ends

1933
1 Mercy House
Amendment Three
Rev. 08-2022

AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE
TO 2020-2021 SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT

AMONG THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, AS GRANTEE UNDER THE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT-CORONAVIRUS PROGRAM,

THE COSTA MESA HOUSING AUTHORITY AND MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS This Amendment Number Three (“Amendment”) is made and entered into this 15th day of November, 20 22 (“Effective Date”) , by and among the CITY OF COSTA MESA ("CITY"), a municipal corporation and MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS, a nonprofit corporation ("SUBRECIPIENT"). CITY and AUTHORITY are collectively referred to herein as "CITY." WHEREAS, CITY and SUBRECIPIENT entered into an agreement dated October 6, 2020 for SUBRECIPIENT to provide shelter, supportive services and housing navigation services for homeless men and women (the "Agreement"); and

WHEREAS,
CITY and SUBRECIPIENT entered into an Amendment One dated June 15, 2021 to amend the use of Community Development Block Grant-Coronavirus ("CDBG-CV ") funds and extend the term (“Amendment One”); and
WHEREAS, Amendment One provides for the expiration of the Agreement on June 30, 2022; and
WHEREAS, CITY and SUBRECIPIENT entered into an Amendment Two dated June 21, 2022 to amend the Agreement term to expire on June 30, 2023 and to increase the amount of CDBG-CV funds to $392,633.00 ("Amendment Two"); and WHEREAS, CITY was awarded American Rescue Plan Act (“AR PA”) funds through the United States Department of the Treasury; and
WHEREAS, CITY desires to provide an additional Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) of ARPA funds to SUBRECIPIENT; and WHER
EAS, CITY and SUBRECIPIENT desire to extend the term for an additional six (6) months, through December 30, 2023; and
WHEREAS, CITY and SUBRECIPIENT desire to amend the Scope of Services to include the additional services set forth in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, CITY and SUBRECIPIENT desire to include ARPA related provisions to the Agreement to ensure compliance with all ARPA-related laws and regulations.

NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1. The term of the Agreement shall be extended through December 31, 2023.

2. The Scope of S
ervices shall be amended to include the additional services set forth in Exhibit A
.

3. Section 4 of the Agreement shall be amended to include that SUBRECIPIENT'S total compensation shall not exceed Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) of ARPA funds.

ATTACHMENT 1
1934
2 Mercy House
Amendment Three

4. The Agreement shall be amended to include Section 13(c), providing that “SUBRECIPIENT understands, acknowledges, and agrees that the funding source for its work is from the American Rescue Plan, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (collectively “ARPA”) and as such, SUBRECIPIENT is required to comply with the regulations associated with ARPA funds pursuant to 31 CFR Part 35. Those regulations and reporting requirements are set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. By executing this Contract, SUBRECIPIENT agrees to comply with all such regulations and reporting requirements and shall familiarize itself with those requirements.”

5. All terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning and use as set forth in the Agreement.

6. All other terms, conditions , and provis ions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

7. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one agreement.

I
N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first written above.

D
ate: __________________________
D
ate: __________________________

SUBRECIPIENT
________________________________
Signature
________________________________
Name and Title

CITY OF COSTA MESA
__________________________________
John Stevens
Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Brenda Green
City Clerk
Rev. 08-2022
1935
3 Mercy House
Amendment Three
Rev. 08-2022

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

__________________________________ Date: __________________________ Kimberly Hall Barlow
City Attorney

APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:

__________________________________ Date: __________________________ Ruth Wang
Risk Management

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

________________________________ Date: __________________________ Lori Karaguezian
Project Manager

DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL:

________________________________ Date: __________________________ Lori Ann Farrell Harrison
City Manager

APPROVED AS TO PURCHASING:

________________________________ Date: __________________________ Carol Molina
Finance Director
1936
4 Mercy House
Amendment Three
Rev. 08-2022

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

1937
City of Costa Mesa ARPA Rental Assistance Program

SCOPE OF WORK

Program Overview

The City of Costa Mesa (City) is seeking the services of an experienced local non-profit and/or consultant (Program Administrator) to implement and administer the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Rental Assistance Program (Program). The purpose of the Program is to provide very-low income Costa Mesa residents with financial assistance to maintain housing at-risk of being lost or secure permanent housing for those experiencing homelessness.

Program Administrator Requirements

Program Administrator shall manage the application, verification, payment and reporting for the Program as follows:
• Provide technical assistance to individuals applying for rental assistance. • Determine applicant eligibility and complete intake documentation. • Determine maximum allowable rent payment per the Orange County Housing Authority (OCHA) Payment Standards (City to provide).
• Distribute rental assistance payments to landlords. Payments will be made in the form of grants payable to the landlord/property owner for a maximum term of six (6) months. • Distribute rental arrears payments (as applicable) to landlords. Rental arrears payment will be made in the form of a grant to the landlord/property owner for a maximum of six (6) months of past-due rent. Rental arrears payments do not count toward the maximum term of rental assistance payments.
• Assess applicant eligibility and amount of assistance required based on evaluation of family or individual’s financial need. Participating households shall earn no more than 50% of the Area Median Income (AMI) and pay no more than 30% of their Adjusted Gross Income toward rent. • Develop, prepare, distribute and process Program application forms, surveys and reporting materials.
• Provide outreach and circulate information of the availability of the Program in coordination with the City.
• Ensure each case file is appropriately closed-out and case files shall be maintained for a period of no less than four (4) years.

Verify the following requirements of Program applications:

• Household is a current resident of Costa Mesa or is currently homeless with strong ties to Costa Mesa (i.e. Live, Work, School).
• Household income at or below 50% AMI as determined by a Part 5 HUD Income Calculator. • Current rental payments as evidenced by an executed lease. • Documented need for the Program assistance.
• Tenant and landlord/property owner self-certification (under penalty of perjury) that they are not receiving any other form of rental subsidy or assistance for the participating household.

Verify the following Program grant payment requirements with landlord/property owner:

1938
• Validate lease/rental agreement between tenant and landlord. • Obtain a landlord/property owner affidavit affirming Program terms. • Create and send letters to applicants confirming or denying their Program grant payment. • Issue rental assistance payments directly to landlord/property owner and send an invoice to the City.

PROGRAM SPECIFICATIONS

Distribution of Funds

Funds will be disbursed from the Program Administrator directly to the landlord/property owner for rental assistance on behalf of an approved program participant. No funds will be disbursed directly to Program beneficiaries.

Amount of rental assistance shall be objectively determined based on the following formula:

• (Household’s Adjusted Gross Income x 0.3) – Base Rent = Maximum Rental Assistance Payment o In special cases, and only when expressly approved by the City, Program Administrator may provide financial assistance equal to 100% of a households rent when failure to do so would result in a shortfall.

Prior to the award of funds, Program Administrator shall submit the following documents to the City:

From the Landlord/Property Owner:

o W-9 for the Landlord/Property Owner receiving rental payment; and o Signed affidavit affirming that the Landlord/Property Owner has not and will not receive payment for the same month(s) rent due for the same tenant from any other rental assistance program.

From the Tenant/Household:

• Executed Rental Assistance Agreement that includes a signed affidavit affirming that the tenant is not receiving rent from any other sources (rental assistance programs, sub-lessees, roommates, etc.).

Reporting Requirements

Monthly - Program Administrator shall submit quarterly reports addressing progress of objectives identified in the Scope of Work by the 15th of the month following the close of each prior month.

Quarterly - Program Administrator shall submit quarterly invoices for services provided to the City by the 15th of the month following the close of the quarter. Quarterly invoices must include back-up documentation for all costs submitted for reimbursement. Only those items in the approved budget, or an approved amendment, will be eligible for reimbursement.

1939
Annually – Program Administrator shall provide an annual report within 45 days of the completion of each contract year. The annual report shall provide a summary of applicants who were approved and received rental assistance to include the following data:
• Name and address
• Participant eligibility
• Income level, ethnicity and race category
• Documented need for rental assistance
• Total rental assistance payment approved including the amount paid and for what month(s)/year

Program Administrator shall provide a summary of applicants who were denied rental assistance to including the following:
• Name and address
• Reason for rental assistance program denial

Program Administrator shall prepare, submit and report the results of a Client Satisfaction Survey of all program applicants to determine their satisfaction with participating in the program and working with the Program Administrator.

If the contract between the City and Program Administrator is extended, the Program Administrator shall provide annual reports following each subsequent contract year.

1940
5 Mercy House
Amendment Three
Rev. 08-2022

EXHIBIT B

ARPA REQUIREMENTS
1941
ARPA Regulations, 31 CFR Part 35 (“Regulations”) are incorporated herein and m ade a part of this Contract
CONTRACTOR agrees to be bound by the reporting requirements set out in the Regulations. This includes submitting quarterly reports by the 15th of the month following the end of each quarter to the City. The reports must include, but is not limited to, the use of the funds, documentation/receipts of the funds spent, description of the project and status of completion of the project. The Director of Finance may require additional information of CONTRACTOR for compliance with ARPA Regulations.

CONTRACTOR, in the performance of this Contrac t and as a sub-re ceipient of ARPA funds, as well as all of its subcontractors, must comply with the following:

1. CONT
RACTOR, and any and all of its subcontractors, must ensure that they do not deny benefits, services or otherwise discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), disability, age, or sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity) in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88 -352, 42 U.S.C. 2000d- 1 et seq., and the Department's implementing regulations, 31 C FR part 22; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), Public Law 93-112, as amended by Public Law 93-516, 29 U.S.C. 794; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., and the Department's implementing r egulations, 31 CFR part 28; Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Public Law 94-135, 42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq., and the Department implementing regulations at 31 CFR part 23.

CONTRACTOR will be required to submit data showing compliance with the above.

2. The Un
iform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards found at 2 CFR Part 200 Appendix II.

3. The C
lean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251et seq.) and all ap plicable standards, orders or regulations.

4. The B
yrd Anti -Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352) regulations regarding restrictions on lobbying and required certificates.

5. Sec
tion 2 CFR 200.323 regarding Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (EPA guidelines at 40 CFR Part 247.

6. Sec
tion 200.322 of 2 CFR 200.322, Domestic preferences for procurements. 1942
City of Costa Mesa
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 22-940 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
TITLE:

COMMITMENT OF $975,000 IN AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS TO FAMILIES

FORWARD FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUNGALOWS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT LOCATED AT 2039 POMONA AVENUE
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
PRESENTED BY: NATE ROBBINS, NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT MANAGER CONTACT INFORMATION: LORI KARAGUEZIAN, SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST, 714-754-5347
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve the appropriation and allocation of $975,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds, or any other viable source of funds, to Families Forward for the development of The Bungalows Project, an affordable housing project to serve an estimated 36 individuals, contingent upon the successful completion of a financial feasibility analysis by the City’s third-party underwriting consultant, Keyser Marston Associates.

2. Authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute the Funding Agreement and all associated documents, as needed, to bring the project to fruition.

BACKGROUND:

Project Description
Families Forward is a local 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, established in 1984 to serve homeless and at-risk families with minor children. Families Forward is an industry leader in high-quality service delivery, enabling each household they serve to achieve independence and stability. The mission of Families Forward is to help vulnerable households achieve and maintain economic stability and self- sufficiency through food, housing, counseling, education, and other support services.

The Bungalows Project (“TheBungalows”or “Project”)is located at 2039 Pomona Ave, Costa Mesa, and aims to provide up to 36 individuals with permanent affordable housing and supportive services in eight housing units for Costa Mesa families earning at or below 50% of the Area Median Income for a period of not less than 20 years. Families Forward acquired the property in March 2021 for

Page 1 of 4 ends

1943
File #: 22-940 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
$2.4M in private donor funds.

The units were unoccupied at the time of purchase, therefore, there was no displacement of residents or required relocation expenses. Construction and rehabilitation costs for The Bungalows will be funded through a combination of Families Forward’sexisting capital, a construction loan, in- kind donations, and public/private grants.

Families Forward is collaborating on the Bungalows with HomeAid Orange Country for project management assistance to reduce construction costs by securing in-kind donations of materials and supplies. With the increase of inflation, oil prices, and labor shortages in mind, Families Forward is relying on grants to cover any additional project costs.

Request for Qualifications (RFQual)
On July 18, 2022, the City issued RFQual #23-01 soliciting proposals for HOME funds for the development of affordable housing projects. The RFQual was published on the City website, on Planet Bids, and an electronic letter was emailed to interested developers and nonprofit organizations who had previously requested to be informed of affordable housing development opportunities and funding.

Following the release of RFQual #23-01, Families Forward submitted a proposal requesting gap financing for The Bungalows.

American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds
The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021, passed by the United States Congress and signed into law on March 11, 2021, includes $350 billion of Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) to state, local, and Tribal governments across the country to support their response to and recovery from the COVID-19 public health emergency. The program ensures that governments have the resources needed to:
• Fight the pandemic and support families and businesses struggling with its public health and economic impacts,
• Maintain vital public services, amid declines in revenue, and • Build a strong, resilient, and equitable recovery by making investments that support long-term growth and opportunity.

ARPA-SLFRF is eligible to use for housing assistance including development of affordable housing.

In July 2022, the US Department of the Treasury and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) collaborated to release the “AffordableHousing How-To Guide”,which provides guidance to local governments on best-practices when utilizing ARPA funds to develop housing.

As stated in the Guide, “[ARPA]funds used for affordable rental housing… are presumptively eligible uses if the units funded serve households at or below 65% of AMI for a period of 20 years or greater.” The Bungalows, as proposed, is affordable rental housing serving households at or below 50% AMI

Page 2 of 4 ends

1944
File #: 22-940 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
The Bungalows, as proposed, is affordable rental housing serving households at or below 50% AMI for a period of 20 years; therefore, is presumed eligible to receive an award of ARPA funds.

ANALYSIS:

Families Forward has updated and resubmitted their proposal (Attachment 1) for The Bungalows, wherein, they are requesting a $975,000 grant as gap financing to develop the Project.

The Bungalows is an 8-unit, in-fill, affordable housing development situated in a predominantly multi- family residential neighborhood that will serve up to 36 individuals. The Project includes substantial rehabilitation of all internal and external spaces, including the renovation of 6 existing units, as well as ground-up construction of 2 new accessory dwelling units (ADUs). The Project will consist of four 1-bedroom/1-bath units, three 2-bedroom/2-bath units, and one 3-bedroom /2-bath unit, with a total livable area of 5,282 square feet. At lease-up, the Bungalows will provide permanent housing and supportive services for up to eight (8) households (up to 34 people) earning at or below 50% of the Area Median Income (i.e. $67,750/yr for a household of four). As will be stipulated in the Affordable Housing Agreement, a local preference for all eight units will be given to homeless and at-risk households with strong “Live,Work, School”ties to Costa Mesa throughout the 20-year affordability period.

The Project also contemplates the rehabilitation of existing on-site amenities including the driveway, landscaping, laundry facilities, two courtyards, storage building and updated utility connections. The Bungalows will be closely managed by Families Forward’sProperty Management Team as well as a Property Maintenance Technician. In addition, tenants will have access to a 24/7 emergency maintenance line and an online portal to complete tasks such as requesting repairs or paying rent.

City Staff has reviewed Families Forward’s proposal and determined the Project aligns with the Council Goal to “Diversify,Stabilize and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs.”Additionally, the Project’snew construction of two (2) very-low income ADU’swill count toward the City’s6th Cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation of 11,760 housing units. Lastly, through a strong partnership with the Newport Mesa Unified School District (NMUSD), the City has identified the need for affordable housing able to accommodate households consisting of 3+ members. Per NMUSD’sdata regarding the Free-Reduced Price Meal Program, 35% (5,929) of the nearly 18,000 students enrolled are eligible to receive free meals. Eligibility for the Free Meal Program is contingent upon a student’sannual household income being at or below 130% of the Federal Poverty Level, or $36,075 annually for a household of four.

The Project is in the best interest of the City and will provide much-needed affordable housing for Costa Mesa families with children.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may choose not to approve an award of $975,000 to the Project. If the City does not approve the funding, Families Forward will likely not be able to move forward with this project. This is not recommended as long-term affordable housing for very-low income Costa Mesa families experiencing and at-risk of homelessness is a Council priority.

Page 3 of 4 ends

1945
File #: 22-940 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
FISCAL REVIEW:

Upon City Council approval, ARPA funds or other eligible funds in the amount of $975,000 will be appropriated for this project.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney’s Office has reviewed this report and approved as to form.

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following City Council Goal:
· Diversify, Stabilize and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve the appropriation and allocation of $975,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds, or any other viable source of funds, to Families Forward for the development of The Bungalows Project, contingent upon the successful completion of a financial feasibility analysis by the City’s third-party underwriting consultant, Keyser Marston Associates.

2. Authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute the Funding Agreement and all associated documents, as needed, to bring the project to fruition.

Page 4 of 4 ends

1946
City of Costa Mesa
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 22-939 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
TITLE:

APPROVE A COMMITMENT OF $850,000 OF LOW/MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUNDS TO CM MERCY HOUSE CHDO, LLC, FOR THE CONVERSION OF THE MOTEL 6 INTO A HOMEKEY PROJECT LOCATED AT 2274 NEWPORT BOULEVARD IN COSTA MESA DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
PRESENTED BY: NATE ROBBINS, NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT MANAGER CONTACT INFORMATION: LORI KARAGUEZIAN, SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST, 714-754-5347, [email protected]
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve an appropriation and allocation of $850,000 in Low/Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds to CM Mercy House CHDO LLC for development of the Motel 6 Project Homekey Housing Project.

2. Authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute the Funding Agreement and all associated documents, as needed, to bring the project to fruition and create an estimated 88 units of permanent affordable housing.

BACKGROUND:

Project Description
The Motel 6 Housing Project (“Motel 6” or “Project”)is located at 2274 Newport Boulevard, Costa Mesa. The Project site is approximately 1.16 acres, which includes the building currently occupied by Motel 6 Costa Mesa, consisting of 94 guest rooms for commercial/hospitality use. The proposed Project contemplates the conversion of the motel property into 88 units of permanent affordable housing. The project will include 30 units for Veterans at-risk of or experiencing homelessness, 10 units for households at-risk of or experiencing homelessness that are eligible to receive Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) assistance, and the remaining 47 units will be set-aside for Costa Mesa senior citizens (age 62+) earning 50% or less of the Area Median Income (AMI). The Project has secured funding commitments from and is an outstanding collaboration between the State Homekey Program, County of Orange and City of Costa Mesa.

Page 1 of 5 ends

1947
File #: 22-939 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
Homekey Program
The California Department of Housing and Community Development’s Homekey Program (“Homekey”or “Homekey Program”) provides direct housing opportunities for homeless and at-risk households by subsidizing the acquisition and conversion of hotels and motels into permanent housing.

Motel conversions to permanent housing and participation in the Homekey Program were identified as City Council objectives during the goal-setting retreat held in September 2021.

On April 25, 2022, the Motel 6 Project was awarded $10,675,000 in Homekey funds from the State.

Per Homekey Program requirements, construction and/or rehabilitation of Homekey units must be completed within 12 months of the date of grant award (i.e. April 25, 2023) and the Project must be fully occupied within 90 days of completing construction.

When completed, the Motel 6 Project will generate up to 88 units of permanent affordable housing and will be the first deed-restricted affordable housing units credited towards the City’s6th Cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation of 11,760 new housing units.

HOME Investment Partnerships Program
The City of Costa Mesa is a recipient of two U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) grant program funds, the Community Block Grant (CDBG) Program and the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME).

The Housing and Community Development Division (HCD) of the Development Services Department is responsible for administering the City’s CDBG and HOME grants. CDBG and HOME-funded activities must address the needs outlined in the City’sConsolidated Plan. The Consolidated Plan is a five-year planning document required by HUD for all communities receiving federal community development grant funds. The Annual Action Plan is the one-year expenditure plan for the use of HUD’s annual allocation of funds.

On May 3, 2022, the City Council approved the FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan, which included the authorization to issue a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to solicit applications for funding to support permanent affordable housing in the City using HOME Program funds. The total funds allocated to this effort for 2022-2023 include HOME program income and prior year uncommitted HOME entitlement funds in the amount of $2.3 million.

Request for Qualifications (RFQ)
On July 11, 2022, the City issued RFQl #23-01 soliciting proposals for HOME funds for affordable housing development projects. The RFQ was published on the City website, on Planet Bids, and an electronic letter was emailed to interested developers and nonprofit organizations who had previously requested to be informed of affordable housing development opportunities and funding.

Following the release of RFQ #23-01, Community Development Partners (CDP) and Mercy House (as co-owners, co-developers, and managing partners) submitted a proposal identifying a funding gap of $1.5 Million for the Motel 6 project. The proposal met the minimum threshold requirement of

Page 2 of 5 ends

1948
File #: 22-939 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
gap of $1.5 Million for the Motel 6 project. The proposal met the minimum threshold requirement of 75 points, thus qualifying the proposal to be brought before City Council for review and potential funding award.

On July 19, 2022, the City Council approved an award of $1.5 Million in HOME funds to CDP to develop the Motel 6 into permanent affordable housing. All City HOME funds will be disbursed to the Project as repayable loans subject to a Regulatory Agreement, which will stipulate the required terms and conditions of the loan.

Local Match for Homekey Funds
On November 16, 2021, the City Council approved a total allocation of $3.5 million in ARPA funds as local match for “one or two” potential Homekey projects. Since the second project is no longer moving forward as a Homekey project, the total allocation of $3.5 million in ARPA funds was approved by the City Council for this project. This funding, when added to the HOME funds of $1.5 million, results in a total of $5 million for this project and the creation of much needed additional affordable housing in Costa Mesa.

Summary of Awarded City Funding
Funding Source Approved Type Amount
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) 11/16/21 Grant $3,500,000 HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) 7/19/22 Loan $1,500,000 Total Financial Award $5,000,000
Request For Additional Funding
On October 27, 2022, City and County staff were notified by the Developer of an unanticipated rise in construction costs due to inflation and supply chain challenges being experienced throughout the nation. County staff will be taking a recommendation to their Board of Supervisors on December 6, 2022 to award an additional $850,000 to CM Mercy House CHDO LLC for the Project, which will cover 50% of the increased costs.

The other 50% of the funding gap of $850,000 is recommended by Staff to be funded by the City’s Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, to ensure completion of the project.

Low/Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund
The Low/Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF) can be used to develop affordable housing for those at or below 80% AMI. Per the FY 20-21 Housing Authority Annual Report as Housing Successor, as of December 31, 2021, the City’sLMIHAF had an ending balance of $3.7 million making it an ideal source to help fund the gap.

Page 3 of 5 ends

1949
File #: 22-939 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
ANALYSIS:

The Motel 6 Project will provide permanent affordable housing for eighty-seven (87) individuals certified as extremely-low (30% AMI) and very-low (50% AMI) income. The successful operation of the Project relies upon the provision of on-site case management to these vulnerable veterans, seniors and at-risk households.

An additional contribution of $850,000 to the Motel 6 project will allow the Developer to complete the Project as originally intended by subsidizing the increased material costs and construction. The Developer has already reduced other costs to reduce the funding gap to the greatest extent possible.

This final funding allocation, in concert with the County’scontribution of an equal amount, will help the project come to final fruition.

Summary of Proposed City Funding
Funding Source Approved Type Amount
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) 11/16/21 Grant $3,500,000 HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) 7/19/22 Loan $1,500,000 LMIHAF TBD Loan $ 850,000
Total Financial Award $5,850,000
ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may choose not to approve the additional contribution of $850,000 to the Project. If the City does not approve the additional funding, the Project will lack the financing it requires to move forward and it will not take place.

FISCAL REVIEW:

Upon City Council approval, LMIHAF funds in the amount of $850,000 will be appropriated for this project. There are sufficient fund balances to support this request.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney’s Office has reviewed this report and approved as to form.

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following City Council Goal:
· Diversify, Stabilize and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs

Page 4 of 5 ends

1950
File #: 22-939 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve an appropriation and allocation of $850,000 in Low/Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds for development of the Motel 6 Project Homekey Project.

2. Authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute the Funding Agreement and all associated documents, as needed, to bring the project to fruition.

Page 5 of 5 ends

1951
City of Costa Mesa
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 22-953 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
TITLE:

ADOPTION OF THE 2022 - 2025 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE

CITY OF COSTA MESA (CITY) AND THE COSTA MESA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CMCEA) AND THE ADOPTION OF ACCOMPANYING SALARY RESOLUTIONS FOR CMCEA

AND THE CONFIDENTIAL UNIT
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE- HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION PRESENTED BY: KASAMA LEE, HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER
CONTACT INFORMATION: KASAMA LEE, HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER (714) 754-5169
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve and Adopt the 2022 - 2025 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Costa Mesa and the Costa Mesa City Employees Association (CMCEA);

2. Approve and Adopt Resolution Numbers 2022-XX, 2022-XX, 2022-XX, 2022-XX, 2022-XX, and 2022-XX revising the pay ranges for CMCEA and the Confidential Unit (Attachments I - VII);

3. Approve the Fiscal Impact Analyses (Attachment VIII); and

4. Authorize the City Manager and members of the City’sNegotiation Team to execute the MOU documents and appropriate into the respective departmental budgets.

BACKGROUND:

In March 2020, mid-way through the budget development process, the City was faced with the impacts of the worldwide coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). The multiple emergency proclamations of the United States President, State of California Governor, and the City Manager for the City of Costa Mesa propelled the City into full emergency management mode. On March 12, 2020, pursuant to Government Code Section 8558 (c) and Chapter 1 of Title 6 of the City of Costa Mesa Municipal Code, the City Manager and Director of Emergency Services issued an Emergency Declaration due to the unanticipated and deadly COVID-19 worldwide outbreak. The City was faced with significant and unprecedented workload and financial challenges due to the continuing global COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to the devastating impacts on public health and mortality, the impact of COVID -19 on the American economy was also severe. As a result, numerous General Fund revenue sources were declining significantly including tax revenues (e.g., sales tax, hotel tax, and business license tax, etc.).

At the June 25, 2020 Council Meeting, a Side Letter of Agreement with CMCEA was approved to

Page 1 of 5 ends

1952
File #: 22-953 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
At the June 25, 2020 Council Meeting, a Side Letter of Agreement with CMCEA was approved to achieve the equivalency of a five percent (5%) furlough. The Side Letter of Agreement also contained the following key provisions:
· Two (2) year contract extension to June 30, 2022
· Elimination of Tier 2 vacation accrual plan
· 2% salary increase effective June 2022
· Elimination of Tier 2 salary ranges
· Increase flex benefit contribution by $100/mo. effective June 2022 The side letter language stated that a one-time payment would be made by the City to the employees equivalent to the reductions taken should the City receive Federal stimulus funds in excess of $40.5 million. The City of Costa Mesa had received CARES Act funding from the State of $1.4 million and the County of Orange of $1.0 million totaling $2.4 million, and finally, the federal government recently approved the American Rescue Plan allocating $28.3 million to the City of Costa Mesa. Between CARES Act and the American Rescue Plan, the City was expected to receive an estimated amount of $30.7 million. Pro-rated to the nine months into the current fiscal year, the stimulus funding equated to an estimated $30.4 million. As a result, staff requested to cease the five percent (5%) furloughs/reductions and provide staff with the one-time reimbursement for the pay reductions implemented since July 1, 2020.

At the April 6, 2021 City Council meeting, the City Manager was authorized by City Council to enter into side letter negotiations for the sole purpose of eliminating the five (5%) percent furlough across all labor groups. Staff met with all of the City’semployee associations to negotiate the elimination of the furlough and reimbursement of salary and benefit cuts already incurred. An agreement was reached with CMCEA to amend the 2020 side letters. The elimination of the furlough and reimbursement of salary cuts were also applied to non-represented Confidential employees.

The Fiscal Year 2022-2023 budget includes a total of 550 full-time employees which includes 261 CMCEA employees and 22 Confidential employees. During the Great Recession, the City lost 146 full-time positions. While the number of full-time staff at the City has grown, the workload attributed to the pandemic, implementation of Measure Q and major development projects across the City, in addition to an increased workload overall, has magnified the need to both stabilize and enhance the workforce commensurately.

The previous collective bargaining agreement between the City and CMCEA covered years 2016- 2022 and expired on June 30, 2022. A series of collaborative and productive meetings between the City’sdesignated negotiation team and CMCEA’snegotiation team were held, which resulted in the attached tentative agreement 2022 - 2025 CMCEA MOU (Attachment I). The proposed MOU would expire on June 30, 2025.

ANALYSIS:

For the duration of the 2016-2022 MOU agreement, CMCEA and Confidential employees realized incremental increases in salaries and benefits. The last across-the-board increases for CMCEA and Confidential employees included:

Page 2 of 5 ends

1953
File #: 22-953 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
· 2% salary increase in June 2022
· 2.75% increase in July 2019 and July 2018
· 2.5% increase in July 2017 and March 2017
· Reduction of 3.044% in retirement contributions in March 2017 · Reduction of 1% in retirement contributions in July 2017 and July 2018 · $181/mo. health benefits increase in March 2017
· $100/mo. health benefits increase in July 2017, July 2018, July 2019, and June 2022 The expiration of the CMCEA MOU for 2016-2022 prompted labor negotiations discussions.

However, prior to the expiration of the MOU, the City took several significant actions to help address recruitment and retention issues. While these actions helped address a number of hard-to-fill positions through market adjustments, salary and benefits remain a challenge in this competitive employment market with the current inflation rate at 8% and the Consumer Price Index at 8%.

The City’sNegotiation Team and CMCEA Negotiation Team held several meetings to discuss the MOU and issues raised by both parties, including but not limited to wages, benefits, and personnel policies. During the course of negotiations, the City Negotiation Team has met with the City Council to discuss the status and progress of negotiations and to receive direction specific to provisions under consideration. The negotiations were collaborative and were based on the shared interests of the CMCEA employees and the City. The results of the negotiations have been compiled in a proposed MOU. The proposed MOU takes into consideration specific objectives that align with the City Council’sStrategic Plan Goal - Recruit, Retain High Quality Staff and the City’scurrent financial health as the proposed provisions have financial implications. A summary of the most significant MOU revisions is included below.

The following are the key provisions of the negotiated CMCEA MOU:
· Term of MOU
o Upon City Council adoption the term of this MOU will commence on July 1, 2022, to be effective through June 30, 2025.
· Salaries and Wages
o Effective January 2023, two percent (2%) increase
o Effective July 2023, three percent (3.0%) increase
o Effective July 2024, three percent (3.0%) increase
· Cost Sharing and Retirement Contributions
o Effective July 2023, reduction of 3% of employee cost sharing which will require future City Council approval to amend the City’s current cost sharing agreement with CalPERS via Government Code 20516(a).

Page 3 of 5 ends

1954
File #: 22-953 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
· Health Insurance/Flex Benefit Contribution
o Effective January 2023, the flexible benefit monthly contribution will increase to $1,550 per month. The maximum cash out will be $1,500 per month. o Effective January 2024, the flexible benefit monthly contribution will increase to $1,600 per month. The maximum cash out will be $1,500 per month. o Effective January 2025, the flexible benefit monthly contribution will increase to $1,650 per month. The maximum cash out will be $1,500 per month. · Deferred Compensation
o Effective January 2023, annual employer match contribution up to 0.5% of base salary. · Standby Pay
o Increase of ½ hour per weekday and 1.25 hours per weekend day and holidays. · Vacation Accrual
o Maximum accrual for vacation leave increased to 380 hours. · Sick Leave
o Sick leave accrual convert to bi-weekly accrual
o Maximum accrual is 480 hours
o New employees shall be provided with 96 hours in sick leave bank upon hire. · Shift Assignment Pay
o Allows employees regularly assigned to day shift, to receive shift assignment pay when working over-time in an A.M. or P.M. shift.
· Performance Evaluations
o Employees to receive their merit increase no later than 60 days from their anniversary date.

The CMCEA negotiating team have agreed to a tentative agreement. The CMCEA ratification process was completed on November 4, 2022. The above mentioned provisions will also apply to non-represented Confidential employees.

Some of the provisions agreed to above may have an impact on other employee groups per the “me too”provisions in other side letters and resolutions. These provisions are currently under review, and updated side letters and resolutions for the Costa Mesa Fire Association, Costa Mesa Fire Management Association, Costa Mesa Police Management Association, Costa Mesa Division Managers Association, and unrepresented Executives and Confidential Managers will be brought back at a future council meeting for City Council approval.

Approval of the attached resolutions confers authority upon the City Manager to take all steps necessary to implement this MOU.

ALTERNATIVES:

The parties to this agreement considered a variety of issues in the context of good faith negotiations in accordance with Government Code Section 3500, et seq. (Meyer-Milias-Brown Act). The CMCEA

Page 4 of 5 ends

1955
File #: 22-953 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
in accordance with Government Code Section 3500, et seq. (Meyer-Milias-Brown Act). The CMCEA members have ratified the tentative agreement. This MOU represents the successful conclusion of labor negotiations, and alternatives need not be considered as a result of collaborative efforts expended.

FISCAL REVIEW:

The Fiscal Impact Analysis prepared pursuant to the City Council Policy 300-8 Transparency in Labor Negotiations recognizes the Fiscal Year 2022-23 increase is estimated at $570,000, and will take effect during the payroll cycle inclusive of January 1, 2023. The estimated annual fiscal impact to the City’s future budget is $1.5 million, cumulating to approximately $3.6 million over the life of the contract.

Staff is requesting budget appropriations in the respective departments. General Fund revenues are tracking higher than pre-pandemic levels, and can cover the financial impact this fiscal year. Funding for future fiscal years will be included as part of that respective year’s budget process.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City’s special counsel, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore (LCW) and City Attorney’s Office have reviewed the agreements and resolutions and this report and approved them as to form.

CONCLUSION:

The proposed MOU and salary range adjustments support the City’sStrategic Plan Goals to recruit and retain high quality staff. Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve and adopt the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Costa Mesa and the Costa Mesa City Employees Association. (Attachment I).

2. Adopt Resolution Number 2022-XX (Attachment II), which revises the pay ranges for CMCEA effective January 2023.

3. Adopt Resolution Number 2022-XX (Attachment III), which revises the pay ranges for CMCEA effective July 2023.

4. Adopt Resolution Number 2022-XX (Attachment IV), which revises the pay ranges for CMCEA effective July 2024.

5. Adopt Resolution Number 2022-XX (Attachment V), which revises the pay ranges for the Confidential Unit effective January 2023.

6. Adopt Resolution Number 2022-XX (Attachment VI), which revises the pay ranges for the Confidential Unit effective July 2023.

7. Adopt Resolution Number 2022-XX (Attachment VII), which revises the pay ranges for the Confidential Unit effective July 2024.

8. Approve the Fiscal Impact Analyses (Attachment VIII).

9. Authorize the City Manager and the City’sNegotiation Team to execute the MOU documents, and appropriate into the respective departmental budgets.

Page 5 of 5 ends

1956
1 MEMORANDUM

OF UNDERSTANDING
Between The Representative of the
Costa Mesa City Employees Association
And the City of Costa Mesa
Attachment 1
1957
2 CMCEA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 5 ARTICLE 1 - RECOGNITION/PREAMBLE ......................................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 2 - TERM OF AGREEMENT ................................................................................................ 6 CHAPTER 2 - COMPENSATION ............................................................................................................... 6 ARTICLE 3 - SALARIES AND WAGES ............................................................................................... 6

3.1 - BASE SALARY .......................................................................................................................... 6

3.2 - MERIT SALARY ADVANCEMENT ........................................................................................ 6

3.3 - LABOR MARKETPLACE ......................................................................................................... 7 ARTICLE 4 – ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION ................................................................................. 7

4.1 - BILINGUAL PAY ....................................................................................................................... 7

4.2 - MATRON PAY ........................................................................................................................... 8

4.3 - “EMD” CERTIFICATION PAY ................................................................................................. 8

4.4 - STANDBY PAY .......................................................................................................................... 8

4.5 - COURT STANDBY PAY ........................................................................................................... 9

4.6 - SHIFT ASSIGNMENT PAY EXCEPT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU ............. 9

4.7 – SHIFT ASSIGNMENT PAY TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU ..................................... 9

4.8 – SHORTHAND ASSIGNMENT PAY ......................................................................................... 9

4.9 – CLASS A and B LICENSE INCENTIVE PAY ......................................................................... 9

4.10 – MOVE UP PAY ...................................................................................................................... 10

4.11 – SAFETY SHOE ALLOWANCE ............................................................................................ 10

4.12 – DEFERRED COMPENSATION MATCH ............................................................................. 11 ARTICLE 5 - CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION ............................................................... 11

5.1 - REQUEST FOR STUDIES ....................................................................................................... 11

5.2 - NEW CLASSIFICATIONS ....................................................................................................... 11 ARTICLE 6 - HOURS WORKED ......................................................................................................... 11

6.1 - OVERTIME ............................................................................................................................... 11

6.2 - COMPENSATORY TIME OFF ................................................................................................ 12

6.3 - CALL BACK DUTY ................................................................................................................. 12

6.4 - CALL RESPONSE DURING LUNCH PERIODS ................................................................... 13

6.5 - DAY-FOR-DAY EXCHANGE OF WORK SHIFTS ............................................................... 13

6.6 - SHIFT TRADING ..................................................................................................................... 13

6.7 - ATTENDANCE ......................................................................................................................... 13 ARTICLE 7 – WORKWEEK AND WORK SCHEDULES .................................................................. 13

7.1 – WORKWEEK ........................................................................................................................... 13

7.2 – WORK SCHEDULE ................................................................................................................. 13

7.3 – SHIFT COVERAGE FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ...................................... 14 1958
3 CHAPTER 3 - BENEFITS ......................................................................................................................... 14 ARTICLE 8 – HEALTH INSURANCE AND RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFIT PROGRAM ............ 14

8.1 – IRS SECTION 125 BENEFIT PLAN ....................................................................................... 14

8.2 – MANDATORY BENEFITS ..................................................................................................... 14

8.3 – PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT ....................................... 14

8.4 – CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT .................................................................................................. 15

8.4 – QUALIFICATION FOR FLEX CONTRIBUTION ................................................................. 15

8.5 – RETIRED EMPLOYEES MEDICAL PROGRAM .................................................................. 15 ARTICLE 9 – RETIREMENT ............................................................................................................... 16

9.1 – CALPERS ................................................................................................................................. 16

9.2 – CALPERS CONTRACT ........................................................................................................... 18 ARTICLE 10 – TUITION REIMBURSEMENT AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ............. 18

10.1 – TUITION REIMBURSEMENT.............................................................................................. 18

10.2 – PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 4 – LEAVES OF ABSENCE ................................................................................................... 19 ARTICLE 11 – LEAVES ....................................................................................................................... 19

11.1 – VACATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 19

11.2 – SICK LEAVE .......................................................................................................................... 21

11.3 – ENTITLEMENT TO VACATION AND SICK LEAVE ....................................................... 24

11.4 – LEAVES OF ABSENCE WITH OR WITHOUT PAY .......................................................... 24

11.5 – LEAVE FOR NON OCCUPATION INJURY OR ILLNESS ................................................ 24

11.6 – CATASTROPHIC ILLNESS LEAVE .................................................................................... 25

11.7 – MILITARY LEAVES ............................................................................................................. 26

11.8 – SCHOOL ACTIVITY LEAVE ............................................................................................... 26

11.9 – REPORTING ABSENCES ..................................................................................................... 26

11.10 – BEREAVEMENT LEAVE ................................................................................................... 26

11.11 – HOLIDAY LEAVE ............................................................................................................... 26

11.12 – JURY DUTY ......................................................................................................................... 28

11.13 – INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT LEAVE .................................................................................... 29

11.14 – FAMILY AND MEDICAL CARE LEAVE ......................................................................... 31 CHAPTER 5 – EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS ........................................................................ 31 ARTICLE 12 - GRIEVANCES .............................................................................................................. 31

12.1 – DEFINITION OF A GRIEVANCE ........................................................................................ 31

12.2 – GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ................................................................................................. 32 ARTICLE 13 - DISCIPLINE ................................................................................................................. 34

13.1 – BASIS FOR DISCIPLINE ...................................................................................................... 34

13.2 – TYPES OF DISCIPLINE ........................................................................................................ 35

13.3 – NOTICES ................................................................................................................................ 37

13.4 – EMPLOYEE’S RESPONSE ................................................................................................... 37

13.5 – APPEAL PROCEDURE ......................................................................................................... 37 1959
4 ARTICLE 14 – LAYOFF PROCEDURES ............................................................................................ 40

14.1 – PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................... 40

14.2 – PROCEDURE ......................................................................................................................... 40 ARTICLE 15 – UNIFORM APPLICATION OF RULES ..................................................................... 42 ARTICLE 16 – COST OF SERVICES .................................................................................................. 43

16.1 – POLICY .................................................................................................................................. 43

16.2 – CONTRACTING OUT ........................................................................................................... 43 ARTICLE 17 – TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT IN CMCEA-REPRESENTED POSITIONS .......... 43 ARTICLE 18 – LABOR MANAGEMENT DISCUSSIONS ................................................................ 43 ARTICLE 19 - SUPERVISORY JOB CLASSIFICATIONS ................................................................ 43 ARTICLE 20 - PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS ............................................................ 43 ARTICLE 21 – BENEFIT REVIEW COMMITTEE ............................................................................. 43 APPENDIX A .......................................................................................................................................... 45 1960
5 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
ARTICLE 1 - RECOGNITION/PREAMBLE

1.1 By resolution of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa and pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, Section 3500 et. Seq. of the California Government Code, the City of Costa Mesa (hereinafter called the "City") has recognized the Costa Mesa City Employees Association (hereinafter referred to as “Association” or "CMCEA") as the exclusive representative and agent for collective bargaining for the employees in job classifications set forth herein. The Association and the City are the Parties to this agreement and are jointly recognized herein below as "The Parties."

1.2 This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has been prepared by representatives of the City and representatives of CMCEA who have met and conferred in good faith, examining a number of proposals and counter proposals concerning wages, hours of employment, fringe benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for the employees of the City as defined in Section 1.1 herein.

1.3 It is the mutual understanding of the City and Association that this MOU shall be submitted to the Costa Mesa City Council with the joint recommendation of the parties that this MOU be adopted and that said City Council will take such other action as may be needed to implement its provisions.

1.4 The wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment specifically referenced in this MOU shall remain in effect unless and until modified, amended or deleted by means of future meet and confer processes, including impasse resolution procedures. If a tribunal of competent jurisdiction holds that any part of this MOU is found to be insufficient, in conflict or inconsistent with other laws, regulations or the obligations of the Parties as defined herein, or is otherwise held to be invalid, unlawful or unenforceable, such part or provision, and only such part or provision shall be severed from this MOU or shall be suspended or superseded by such applicable laws and regulations. To the extent that the implementation thereof falls within the scope of representation, it shall be controlled by the provisions of Government Code Section 3500 et. seq.

1.5 For the term of this MOU, neither party shall be compelled to meet and confer with the other concerning any issue expressly provided for in this MOU. Each Party to this MOU hereby expressly waives its right to demand that the other Party meet and confer concerning any issue expressly covered herein.

However, nothing in this MOU shall prohibit these Parties from meeting and conferring over any issue provided for in this MOU.

1.6 Continuous uninterrupted and efficient service to the City of Costa Mesa by the City and its employees, and orderly employer-employee relations are essential considerations of this MOU.

Accordingly, CMCEA agrees on behalf of itself and its members, individually and collectively, that there shall not be any strikes, non-informational picketing, boycotting, work stoppages, slow-down strikes or any other concerted job actions or by refusal to render services, including overtime or any other curtailment or restriction of work and services at any time.

1.7 CMCEA recognizes its duty and obligation to comply with the provisions of Section 1.6 of this MOU and to make every reasonable effort to assure that all employees covered by this MOU similarly do so. In the event of any concerted activity by employees in violation of the provisions or intent of Section

1.6, CMCEA hereby agrees to direct its members to cease said action or conduct forthwith. No employee covered by this MOU shall be entitled to any benefits or wages whatsoever while engaged in activities prohibited by Section 1.6.

1.8 All rights to manage, organize, direct and control the City's business, including all of the terms and conditions of the employment of any employee of the City, which are not expressly limited, modified, amended or eliminated by this or any other MOU, are retained exclusively by the City and its management 1961
6 personnel. City Management also retains exclusive jurisdiction over any residual portions of any managerial rights which have in part been limited, modified or amended by this MOU.

1.9 During the term of this MOU, the parties agree either side can propose MOU language to clean up provisions which are either outdated or in need of modification. Any language changes must be mutually agreeable.

ARTICLE 2 - TERM OF AGREEMENT
The term of this MOU will commence on July 1, 2022, and will expire in the pay period which includes June 30, 2025.

CHAPTER 2 - COMPENSATION
ARTICLE 3 - SALARIES AND WAGES

3.1 - BASE SALARY
Employees covered by this MOU shall be compensated at the monthly base salary rates established for their classification under the Basic Pay Schedule per City Council resolution. An employee occupying a position in the classified service shall be compensated within the range established for his or her position as provided in Rule 6 of the Personnel Rules and Regulations. The minimum rate for the class generally shall apply to an employee upon his or her original appointment. Employees who are re-employed shall receive a rate within the range established for the class and agreed upon by the appointing authority and the employee prior to appointment.

Effective the pay period that begins on December 18, 2022 (with a pay date of January 6, 2023), two percent (2.0%) increase for all classifications subject to this MOU.

Effective the pay period that includes July 1, 2023, three percent (3%) increase for all classifications subject to this MOU.

Effective the pay period that includes July 1, 2024, three percent (3%) increase for all classifications subject to this MOU.

3.2 - MERIT SALARY ADVANCEMENT
No salary advancement within a classification shall be made so as to exceed the maximum rate established in the pay plan. Advancement shall not be automatic but shall depend upon increased service value to the City as recommended by their supervisor based upon performance record, special training undertaken, length of service and other pertinent factors.

An employee who does not receive an evaluation within sixty (60) days of their anniversary date (i.e., the date the evaluation is due) will receive their merit increase effective the pay period including the employee’s anniversary date regardless of the evaluation rating (which may be less than satisfactory) on an evaluation received after that date. Once the employee receives their evaluation, if an additional increase is recommended, it will be received retroactive to the employee’s anniversary date. An employee who is at top step is not eligible for a merit increase. 1962
7 3.3 - LABOR MARKETPLACE
The “labor marketplace” however defined, shall not mandate any specific compensation adjustment yet may be one of many factors assessed by the parties in determining levels of compensation. In assessing the labor marketplace, both public and private sector classifications may be given consideration as a factor in assessing the “labor marketplace” indication of total compensation levels.

The “total compensation” of employees within the unit and in the “labor marketplace” may be a factor in assessing compensation levels. “Total compensation” shall include but not be limited to the value of City funded base salary, retirement, deferred compensation, health insurance, and other forms of City-funded remuneration as agreed to between the City and the Association.

ARTICLE 4 – ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION

4.1 - BILINGUAL PAY
Bilingual pay of two and one half percent (2.5%) or five percent (5%) of the employee’s base hourly rate for regularly scheduled hours is available to those employees who qualify (based on their skills) per this Article. Employees are eligible to receive bilingual pay if their classification and particular position has been approved by the City Manager or designee to receive the pay. If so approved, employees shall receive the pay.

If an employee wants to test to qualify for bilingual pay, the City will pay for one test per year per employee. An employee may take the test more than once during the year at their own expense.

Employees must be certified annually by their department director and may be re-tested by the Human Resources Division annually to verify their foreign language proficiency in order to maintain eligibility for bilingual pay. If an employee is re-tested by the City, the City will pay for the test.

The City agrees to receive CMCEA input as to what languages should be considered for the bilingual program.

The following standard of spoken Spanish, Vietnamese, or American Sign Language is followed for the 2 ½ % Certification:

A. The applicant has the ability to create with language, recombining and adapting learned material to express personal meaning and can handle simple situations and transactions in the course of their work such as explanation of procedures, obtaining personal information, instructions to victims and onlookers, among others.

B. The applicant is able to maintain simple face-to-face conversations, asking and answering questions regarding everyday survival on topics most related to self and immediate work environment; courtesy requirements, and personal needs during the course of routine calls not likely to be of a life or death nature.

C. The applicant can be understood with some repetition by a sympathetic native speaker.

D. The applicant demonstrates mastery of work-related vocabulary including: time, days of the week, months, family members, parts of the body, motions and states, greetings, home and community, food and beverages, alphabet and numbers, vehicles, simple commands, interrogatory words, etc.

E. Accuracy is required in the present tense and gender distinctions.

F. Core vocabulary of 300-600 words.
1963
8 The 5% Certification requires:

A. Accuracy in present and past tenses.

B. Core vocabulary of 600-1200 words.

C. Exhibits good pronunciation, stress, and intonation skills as judged by the ability to be understood with little repetition or confusion by native speaker.

D. Ability to interview the victim of a crime or accident or other situation involving a native speaker of Spanish or Vietnamese and the conduct simple interrogations and investigations which could be of a life or death nature.

E. Ability to understand description, narration, main ideas and details on a variety of topics beyond the immediate situation.

4.2 - MATRON PAY
The City will endeavor to ensure that non-sworn staff will not be assigned to perform this duty, pursuant to Police Department policy. However, when required as an incidental assignment for trained non-sworn personnel other than a Custody Officer, employees will be paid five percent (5%) of their base hourly rate for each hour they perform the matron duty.

4.3 - “EMD” CERTIFICATION PAY
Telecommunication Division employees who possess an Emergency Medical Dispatch Certification (EMD), shall receive 5% of base salary for regularly scheduled hours paid each pay period.

4.4 - STANDBY PAY
Employees who are released from active duty but who are required by their department to leave notice where they can be reached and be available to return to active duty when required by the department at any time other than their regularly scheduled working hours, shall be said to be on standby duty.

An employee assigned to standby duty shall be paid at the rate of one (1) hour per weekday and four (4) hours per weekend day (for up to a total of thirteen (13) straight time hours) at their base hourly rate for each week so assigned, plus compensation for each hour actually worked pursuant to the callback provisions. If a holiday falls within the assigned standby week, an additional four (4) hours at the employee’s base hourly rate will be given to the person assigned to standby.

Effective the pay period that begins on December 18, 2022 (with a pay date of January 6, 2023), an employee assigned to standby duty shall be paid at the rate of one and one-half (1.5) hours per weekday and five and one-quarter (5.25) hours per weekend day (for up to a total of eighteen (18) straight time hours) at their base hourly rate for each week so assigned, plus compensation for each hour actually worked pursuant to the callback provisions. If a holiday falls within the assigned standby week, an additional five and one quarter (5.25) hours at the employee’s base hourly rate will be given to the person assigned to standby.

Employees on standby duty must remain within a reasonable commuting distance in which the employee must be able to respond to the worksite within one hour of being called. During standby duty, the employee must refrain from activities that might impair their ability to respond or perform assigned duties in a satisfactory manner.
1964
9 4.5 - COURT STANDBY PAY
If an employee receives a job-related subpoena to be standby for court while in a non-paid status (time off), they shall receive two hours at the base hourly rate for each court session.

4.6 - SHIFT ASSIGNMENT PAY EXCEPT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU The City will pay a shift differential for employees in CMCEA-represented classifications who actually work a minimum of five (5) hours during the shift as defined below:

A. A P.M. Shift Differential of 5% over the assigned rate per shift for all CMCEA represented classifications assigned to work a night (swing) shift schedule.

B. An A.M. Shift Differential of 10% over the assigned rate per shift for all CMCEA represented classifications assigned to work a morning (graveyard) shift schedule.

C. Employees eligible for shift differential who work a Cross-Over Shift schedule beginning in one shift, but including at least five (5) hours worked into a P.M. or A.M. Shift, will be compensated at the appropriate Shift Differential rate. For example, an employee working a ten-hour Cross-Over Shift where two-and-a-half hours fall into the PM Shift and seven-and-a- half hours fall into the AM Shift would earn two-and-a half hours of PM Shift Differential and seven-and-a-half hours of AM differential.

D. Employees eligible for shift differential who work an overtime shift during the P.M. or A.M. shift hours will be compensated at the appropriate Shift Differential rate for those hours.

Employees who are continuously and regularly assigned to the Day shift are not eligible for Shift Assignment Pay.

4.7 – SHIFT ASSIGNMENT PAY TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU
Employees in the telecommunications bureau in the classifications of Communications Officer, Senior Communications Officer and Communications Supervisor shall receive a shift differential of

7.5% for those actual hours worked between the hours of 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. only.

4.8 – SHORTHAND ASSIGNMENT PAY
Shorthand is a desirable requirement for all secretarial classifications. The City will pay a 2.5% monthly assignment differential (i.e., 2.5% of the employee’s base hourly rate for regularly scheduled hours) for each full month that an incumbent in a secretarial classification is assigned by the Department Director to utilize the ability to take dictation at a minimum rate of 70 words per minute.

In order to receive and maintain the monthly assignment differential, the incumbent must have successfully passed the City’s shorthand test and the Department Director must annually certify that the incumbent routinely utilizes the skill in the workplace. Effective with this 2022- 2025 MOU, no future employee will be eligible for this pay.

4.9 – CLASS A and B LICENSE INCENTIVE PAY
Eligible employees assigned to positions requiring daily operation of equipment requiring a valid Class A/B California Driver’s License shall receive an annual $700 incentive bonus, subject to the following eligibility criteria:

A. Eligibility – The employee must meet all of the following in order to be eligible for the annual bonus incentive:
1965
10  Employee must be assigned to a position requiring regular operation or maintenance of equipment requiring a valid Class A/B California Driver’s License.  As a condition of employment, employee must obtain and maintain the required California Driver’s license and endorsements (airbrakes, tanker and passenger endorsement if applicable). A manual transmission endorsement shall no longer be required effective August 30, 2020.
 Employee must have a rating of “meets standards” or higher on the employee’s most recent annual performance evaluation. If an employee does not receive their evaluation within 60 days of its due date, they have satisfied this provision.  Employee must have successfully completed probation.
 Employee must have successfully passed the DMV Medical examination.

B. Payment of Annual Incentive – Eligible employees shall receive this annual incentive bonus on their respective anniversary date. Employees must receive a rating of “meets standards” or higher on their most recent annual performance evaluation and submit a copy of their current Class A/B California Driver’s License and current DMV medical certification prior to receipt of the bonus.

C. Lapse of License – Any eligible employee assigned to positions requiring daily operation of equipment requiring a valid Class A/B California Driver’s License who allow their Class A/B California Driver’s License to lapse may be subject to discipline up to and including termination. Any annual incentive bonus to be paid on their next anniversary date will be reduced on a prorated basis.

D. DOT Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulations - Eligible employees assigned to positions requiring daily operation of equipment requiring a valid Class A/B California Driver’s License will be subject to the DOT Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulations and the City’s Drug & Alcohol Policy adopted pursuant to the DOT Regulations.

E. License and DMV Physical Fees - Any employees who successfully renew their Class A/B California Driver’s Licenses or acquire a new license upon starting a new assignment requiring a Class A/B California Driver’s License shall, upon submission of a receipt by the employee, be reimbursed by the City for the difference in fee charged by the DMV between such license and a Class C Driver’s license. The cost of the DMV physical/medical exam will be scheduled and paid by the City.

4.10 – MOVE UP PAY
Eligible employees temporarily assigned to perform the work of a higher classification for a period of at least two weeks will be compensated at 5% above their current rate of pay for up to 90 days.

After 90 days, either the position will be reclassified, the employee will be given an acting appointment, or the move-up duties will be removed from the employee's assignment. Time limits on move-up pay may be extended on an individual basis by prior written, mutual agreement by the City and CMCEA. An acting appointment will be made when the employee is performing all of the duties of the higher-level classification.

Move-up pay will be included in the calculation of the overtime rate when an employee earns overtime.

4.11 – SAFETY SHOE ALLOWANCE
For those employees covered under the City’s Safety Shoe Policy and who meet the criteria for the replacement, repair or purchase of safety shoes, the City agrees to pay up to $225 for the shoe that 1966
11 meets the minimal standard established by the program. All safety shoes/boots purchased must comply with the City’s Safety Shoe Policy.

4.12 – DEFERRED COMPENSATION MATCH
Effective the pay period that begins on December 18, 2022 (with a pay date of January 6, 2023), for any employees who make a voluntary contribution to the employee’s 457(b) account with the City’s 457(b) provider, the City will make an annual contribution to the City’s 457 (b) provider that will equal up to 0.5% of annual base salary for the payroll calendar year.

The City’s contribution will be made on the second to the last pay period of the payroll calendar year. The first contribution will be made in December 2023. If at the time of contribution, the employee has already contributed the maximum allowable per the IRS, the contribution will be issued as earnings. If an employee leaves the bargaining unit (through promotion or separation), the contribution to the City’s 457 plan will occur in their last pay period.

ARTICLE 5 - CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION

5.1 - REQUEST FOR STUDIES
Employees seeking a classification study of their position may request a study through CMCEA. Each January, CMCEA may request that the Human Resources Division conduct up to five classification studies. The CMCEA will be responsible for submitting completed Position Analysis Questionnaires for the requested position studies with a cover memorandum explaining the changes in duties, organization or marketplace for each position. The Human Resources Division will study the positions and meet with CMCEA with its recommendations.

In January of each year, CMCEA may request that the Human Resources Division conduct up to five compensation studies. The Human ResourcesDivision will study the positions and meet with CMCEA with its recommendations.

Commencing with the meet and confer process regarding negotiation of a successor to the 2022-2025 MOU, the results of the above studies shall be one of many factors that may be considered by the parties in formulating and considering proposals for a successor to the 2022-25 MOU, however the product of the above studies shall not result in any mandated changes in wages, hours or other terms and conditions of employment.

5.2 - NEW CLASSIFICATIONS
The City acknowledges its legal obligation to meet and consult with CMCEA prior to the creation of a new classification and to bargain in good faith regarding the appropriate salary for the new classification within its bargaining unit.

ARTICLE 6 - HOURS WORKED

6.1 - OVERTIME
If an employee is required to work longer than the normal work week or shift, the employee shall be compensated for the overtime either (1) by being allowed one and one-half (1-1/2) times the amount of actual overtime hours worked, to be earned as compensatory time off ("comp time"), or (2) by payment for such overtime actually worked paid at time and one half. . Overtime will be paid as follows: if actual hours worked exceed 40 hours in the defined workweek the employee shall be paid for those hours per the requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and paid at their regular rate of pay per the FLSA. If an employee works hours outside their regular shift, but the employee 1967
12 has not worked in excess of 40 hours in their workweek (because they took some form of leave) those hours are referred to as “contract overtime” and paid at 1.5 times the employee’s base hourly rate of pay if the overtime is mandatory and 1.0 times the employee’s base hourly rate of pay if the overtime was voluntary.

Paid leave shall not be considered hours worked for purposes of computing overtime eligibility.

6.2 - COMPENSATORY TIME OFF
A. Accrual of Compensatory Time Off: An employee who earns overtime may, with the department director's approval, accumulate compensatory time off to a maximum accumulation of sixty (60) hours. Employees in the Police Department who must work without regard to the listed holidays in Article 11.11 may accrue compensatory time to a maximum of 80 hours.

B. Use of Compensatory Time Off: A written request to use accrued C.T.O. shall be made and approved no later than 24 hours prior to the requested time off. Twenty-four (24) hours is considered reasonable notice.

All employees (on a first come, first served basis) who submit a request for time off may utilize accrued compensatory time off (“CTO”), provided their vacancy does not result in less than minimum staffing levels on the shift they are scheduled to work. This policy is subject to suspension in emergency situations at the discretion of the Department Director or their designee.

Employees assigned to rotating shifts (i.e., employees who may work different shifts based on shift selection) may not submit a CTO request more than 30 calendar days in advance of the shift rotation in which the CTO day off would fall.

Employees will submit their request to the shift supervisor who shall as soon as possible determine if the CTO request may be granted if it does not take the shift below minimum staffing.

If the CTO vacancy would result in less than minimum staffing levels, the employee will be required to identify an alternate date to take CTO or make approved arrangements for a day- for-day shift trade. A shift trade will not result in overtime compensation or CTO accrual since the employee whose shift is worked gets credit for the shift as regular hours worked.

C. Cash-Out of Compensatory Time Off: Employees will be allowed to cash-out up to 40 hours of compensatory time (time off accrued in lieu of paid overtime) in any payroll period. On the first pay day in January of each year, employees’ compensatory time banks shall cashed out down to 40 hours unless an employee informs payroll that they elect to cash out all of their accrued compensatory time on the first pay day in January.

6.3 - CALL BACK DUTY
Employees who are recalled to active duty from off-duty not as an extension of the scheduled or normal work shift will be considered to be “on call” and shall receive overtime compensation at time and one half (1½) for time actually worked or two (2) hours of overtime pay, whichever is greater.

Employees who are required to report to work immediately shall be compensated at the time of recall.

Employees who are required to report to work at a later time shall be compensated after returning to work. Employees who are able to handle the incident by phone or other electronic means without reporting to duty shall be compensated according to the same callback provisions. 1968
13 6.4 - CALL RESPONSE DURING LUNCH PERIODS
Except for employees who receive a paid lunch period, if an employee is required to work during their lunch period, the time they work during their lunch period shall be at time and one-half (1.5).

Employees are not permitted to forego any portion of their lunch period without prior approval.

6.5 - DAY-FOR-DAY EXCHANGE OF WORK SHIFTS
Day-for-Day exchange of work shifts may be granted by the department director for emergency or other justifiable reasons.

6.6 - SHIFT TRADING
The practice of shift trading shall be voluntary on behalf of each employee involved in the trade. The trade must be due to the employee’s desire or need to attend to a personal matter and not due to the department’s operations. All shift trades must be approved in advance.

The employee providing the trade shall not have their compensable hours increased as a result of the trade; nor shall the employee receiving the trade have their compensable hours decreased as a result of the trade. Any hours worked beyond the normal workday will be credited to the individual actually doing the work.
“Paybacks” of shift trades are the obligation of the two employees involved in the trade. Paybacks are to be completed within the shift deployment of the initial shift trade. Any dispute as to paybacks is to be resolved by the involved employees, and under no circumstances will the department be obligated for any further compensation whatsoever to any of the involved employees. The department is not responsible in any manner for hours owed to employees by other employees that leave the employment of the City or are assigned other duties. Shift trades are not subject to the grievance procedure.

If one individual fails to appear for the other (regardless of the reason), the person who agreed to work the shift per a shift trade will be listed as absent and will be required to use appropriate accrued leave.

A record of all initial shift trades and “paybacks” shall be maintained by the involved employees on forms provided by the department (“Shift Trade Log”).

6.7 - ATTENDANCE
Employees shall be in attendance at their work in accordance with Personnel Rules and Regulations and department policies regarding hours of work, holidays and leaves. All departments shall keep daily attendance records. Any unauthorized tardiness or absence is cause for disciplinary action.

ARTICLE 7 – WORKWEEK AND WORK SCHEDULES

7.1 – WORKWEEK
The average workweek for all full-time positions shall be forty (40) hours. The FLSA workweek is 168 regularly recurring hours. For employees scheduled to work a 9/80 or 3/12 work schedule, their FLSA workweek begins four hours after the start time of their shift on their alternating regular day off. For employees working the 5/40 or 4/10 work schedules, their FLSA workweek shall begin Sunday at 12:00 a.m. and ends on Saturday at 11:59 p.m.

7.2 – WORK SCHEDULE
The following are work schedules that may be worked by employees:
1969
14 5/40 - five eight (8) hour days on and two days off. 9/80 – four nine hour work days followed by one eight hour work day followed by two consecutive days off followed by four nine hour workdays followed by three consecutive days off, or 4/10 - four ten (10) hour days on and three days off.
3/12 – three twelve- hour work days followed by one eight-hour work day followed by three consecutive days off followed by three twelve-hour workdays followed by four consecutive days off.

This work schedule is only for the Telecommunications Bureau.

Work schedules for work shifts established on a pay period basis shall usually be ten (10) eight hour days on and four days off. All employees shall be scheduled at least two consecutive calendar days off. The work schedule for each position shall be established by the department director and approved by the City Manager or designee.

7.3 – SHIFT COVERAGE FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
Employees in the Telecommunications Division working the 3/12 work schedule shall not fall below the minimum staffing of four (4) employees, except that during the hours of 0200 to 0600 from Sunday to Thursday where minimum staffing is three (3) employees.

CHAPTER 3 - BENEFITS
ARTICLE 8 – HEALTH INSURANCE AND RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFIT PROGRAM

8.1 – IRS SECTION 125 BENEFIT PLAN
The City shall continue to provide the amounts listed below toward the payment of premium for employees covered by this Agreement under an IRS Section 125 Benefit Plan. The current core benefits include life and long term disability insurance. Medical insurance is a core benefit which a City employee is required to carry unless they is covered by another medical insurance plan (as addressed in Article 8.4 below) with comparable coverage at the end of the open enrollment period.

8.2 – MANDATORY BENEFITS
Employees must use a portion of the City contribution to pay for life insurance and long-term disability. Employees also must enroll in medical insurance unless the employee meets the eligible opt out requirements to receive cash in lieu.

8.3 – PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT
The City contracts with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) for medical insurance pursuant to the Public Employees’ Medical and Hospital Care Act (“PEMHCA”).

The City will contribute the annual CalPERS statutory minimum on behalf of each participant in the program, which is included in the amount of the City’s contribution to the flexible benefit account (i.e., the Section 125 Benefit Plan) described below. Eligible employees may select any of the medical insurance plans offered by CalPERS.
1970
15 8.4 – CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT
For those employees who enroll in City offered coverage, the City’s contribution towards each employee’s flexible benefit account is one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500.00) per month. This amount is inclusive of the CalPERS statutory minimum amount for each month.

Effective the pay period that begins on December 18, 2022 (with a pay date of January 6, 2023), the City amount is increased to $1,550.00 per month.

Effective the pay period that begins on December 17, 2023 (with a pay date of January 5, 2024), the City amount is increased to $1,600.00 per month.

Effective the pay period that begins on December 15, 2024 (with a pay date of January 3, 2025), the City amount is increased to $1,650.00 per month.

Opt Out: All employees must enroll in an available City health program unless they opt out. In order to opt out, an employee must provide the following: (1) proof that the employee and all individuals for whom the employee intends to claim a personal exemption deduction for the taxable year or years that begin or end in or with the City’s plan year to which the opt out applies (“tax family”), have or will have minimum essential coverage through another source (other than coverage in the individual market, whether or not obtained through Covered California) for the plan year to which the opt out arrangement applies (“opt out period”); and (2) the employee must sign an attestation that the employee and their tax family have or will have such minimum essential coverage for the opt out period. An employee must provide the attestation every plan year at open enrollment or within 30 days after the start of the plan year. The opt-out payment cannot be made and the City will not in fact make payment if the employer knows that the employee or tax family member doesn’t have such alternative coverage, or if the conditions in this paragraph are not otherwise satisfied.

Effective the pay period that begins on December 18, 2022 (with a pay date of January 6, 2023), the maximum opt-out payment is $1,500.00. Employees who use benefits that are less than maximum amount set forth above (after purchase of medical, life and LTD) shall receive the difference between the maximum amount set forth above and the amount they use toward benefit payments. Employees who use benefits shall receive the annual health benefit increases set forth above.

8.4 – QUALIFICATION FOR FLEX CONTRIBUTION
Employees must receive compensation for the entire pay period to receive the flexible benefit contribution amount. Use of accrued leave qualifies as compensation for this purpose. Employees will be ineligible for the flexible benefit contribution if the employee records absence without pay hours within the pay period except if an employee exhausts their accrued leaves prior to the end of the pay period, they shall receive the flex contribution for that pay period. This exception will be permitted once per every six (6) months per rolling year. Disciplinary actions will not disqualify an employee from receiving the flex contribution. Catastrophic illness leave donations to employees will not meet the qualifications for the flex contribution. In addition, to the preceding, for employees within the first six (6) months of employment, or employees who take unpaid time off during the City’s “holiday closure they will not lose their flex contribution if they record absence without pay

8.5 – RETIRED EMPLOYEES MEDICAL PROGRAM
Unit employees hired by the City prior to January 1, 2004 who participated in the City’s group health insurance plan for at least five (5) consecutive years and are enrolled in City medical insurance immediately prior to retirement who retire immediately commence receiving a retirement allowance upon separation from City service will participate in the retiree life and medical insurance programs 1971
16 as defined in City Council Policy 300-1.The City shall continue to provide life and medical insurance for retired employees of the City as defined in Council Policy 300-1.

ARTICLE 9 – RETIREMENT

9.1 – CALPERS
The City contracts with CalPERS for retirement benefits.

A. Employees Who Are Not “New Members” as Defined by Government Code Section 7522.04(f) – i.e., “Classic Members”

1. Retirement Formula: The City contracts with CalPERS to provide the 2.5% at 55 retirement formula (“tier 1”) as set forth in California Government Code Section 21354.4 for all employees covered by this MOU hired before March 11, 2012 and the 2% at 60 retirement formula (“tier 2”) as set forth in California Government Code Section 21353, for all employees covered by this MOU who were hired between March 12, 2012 and December 31, 2012 or hired after December 31, 2012 as lateral employees who qualify as “classic members” under the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (“PEPRA”).

2. Retirement Benefit Calculation Period: The City's contract with CalPERS provides for the "Single Highest Year" retirement benefit for these employees per Government Code section 20042. The retirement benefit is based on the highest annual compensation for the twelve (12) consecutive months selected by the employee or not selected, the employee’s last twelve (12) months of employment.

3. Payment of Employee/Member Contribution:
a. Employees Subject to the 2.5% @ 55 formula:

These employees will pay the full CalPERS member contribution equal to eight percent (8%) of compensation earnable towards their CalPERS member contribution. As a result, the City pays and reports zero percent (0%) of compensation earnable as an Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC) under Government Code section 20636(c)(4) pursuant to section 20691.
b. Employees Subject to the 2%@60 formula:

These employees will pay the full CalPERS member contribution equal to seven percent (7%) of compensation earnable towards their CalPERS member contribution.

As a result, the City pays and reports zero percent (0%) of compensation earnable as an Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC) under Government Code section 20636(c)(4) pursuant to section 20691.

4. Cost Sharing:
a. Classic member employees subject to the 2.5%@55 formula pay 2.469% of compensation earnable pursuant to Government Code section 20516(a) and 1.531% of compensation earnable pursuant to Government Code section 20516(f). Effective July 1, 2023, classic member employees subject to the 2.5%@55 formula shall have their cost sharing per Government Code section 20516(a) reduced by 1.469% for a net contribution of one percent (1%) and cost sharing pursuant to 20516(f) will be reduced from 1.531% to 0%.
1972
17 b. Classic member employees subject to the 2%@60 formula pay five percent (5%) of compensation earnable pursuant to Government Code section 20516(f). Effective the pay period that includes July 1, 2023, cost sharing for employees subject to the 2%@60 formula will be reduced from five percent (5%) to two percent (2%) and will be pursuant to Government Code section 20516(a).

B. For “New Member” Employees
“New Members” are defined in Government Code section 7522.04(f) as follows:
"New member" means any of the following:
(1) An individual who becomes a member of any public retirement system for the first time on or after January 1, 2013, and who was not a member of any other public retirement system prior to that date.
(2) An individual who becomes a member of a public retirement system for the first time on or after January 1, 2013, and who was a member of another public retirement system prior to that date, but who was not subject to reciprocity under subdivision (c) of Section 7522.02.
(3) An individual who was an active member in a retirement system and who, after a break in service of more than six months, returned to active membership in that system with a new employer.

New Members are subject to the provisions of this subsection B:

1. Retirement Formula: Unit members who are defined as “new members” are covered by the 2%@62 formula provided for by the Public Employees’ Retirement Law at Government Code section 7522.20.

2. Retirement Benefit Calculation Period: These employees’ final compensation is based on the highest annual average compensation earnable during the three consecutive years of employment immediately preceding the effective date of their retirement or any other three consecutive year period chosen by the employee as set forth in Government Code section 7522.32(a).

3. Payment of Employee/Member Contribution: New member employees are responsible for paying the employee contribution of one-half of the total normal cost of the plan (rounded to the nearest quarter of one-percent), as defined by CalPERS in their annual valuation, through a payroll deduction. This amount is determined by CalPERS each year.

4. Cost Sharing: New member employees will cost share (pursuant to Government Code section 20516(f)), a percentage of pensionable compensation that when combined with the payment of their employee/member contribution will equal twelve percent (12%) of pensionable compensation. For example, if the CalPERS annual valuation report for 2022, provides that the City’s normal cost rate is 6.50%, the new member employees will cost share 5.5% of pensionable compensation for 2022. If, for example, the CalPERS annual valuation report for 2023, provides that the City’s normal cost rate is 6.75%, the new member employees will cost share 5.25% of pensionable compensation for 2023.

Effective the pay period that includes July 1, 2023, new member employees will cost share (pursuant to Government Code section 20516(f), a percentage of pensionable compensation that when combined with the payment of their employee/member 1973
18 contribution will equal nine percent (9%) of pensionable compensation. For example, if the CalPERS annual valuation report for 2023, provides that the City’s normal cost rate is

6.50%, the new member employees will cost share 2.5% of pensionable compensation for effective the pay period including July 1, 2023. If, for example, the CalPERS annual valuation report for 2024, provides that the City’s normal cost rate is 6.75%, the new member employees will cost share 2.25% of pensionable compensation for 2024.

C. Adoption of the IRS Code section 414(h)(2) Resolution The City has adopted the CalPERS resolution in accordance with IRS Code section 414(h)(2) to ensure that the employee contribution is made on a pre-tax basis.

9.2 – CALPERS CONTRACT
The City will continue to provide pension benefits to represented employees in accordance with the CalPERS contract in effect on the effective date of this MOU. The City's contract with CalPERS for employees covered by this MOU includes the following options:
 Section 20042 (Final Compensation 1 Year only applies to classic member employees)  Section 20037 (Final Compensation 3 Years only applies to New Member employees)  Section 20516 (Employee Sharing Additional Cost, only applies to classic member Tier 1 employees)
 Section 20965 (Unused Sick Leave Credit – Local Member)  Section 21031 Public Service Credit for Limited Prior Service  Sections
21624/21626
(Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance, only applies classic member employees)
 Section 21620 ($500 Retired Death Benefit)
 Section 21329 (2% Annual Cost-of-Living Allowance Increase)  Section 21354.4 (2.5% @ 55 Formula for Local Miscellaneous Members, only applies to classic member Tier 1 employees)
 Section 21353 (2% @ 60 Formula for Industrial and Miscellaneous Members, only applies to classic member Tier 2 employees)
 Section 7522.20 2 @ 62 Formula for Miscellaneous/Industrial Members  Section 20903 (Additional Service Credit 2 Years – Local Member)  Section 21635 (Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance to Continues After Remarriage)  Section 21573 (Survivor Benefit Level 3)
 Section 21551 (Pre-Retirement Death Benefits to Continue After Remarriage of Survivor)
 Section 20055 (Prior Service)
 Section 21024 Military Service Credit as Public Service  Section 21023.5 (Public Service Credit for Peace Corps, AmeriCorps VISTA, or AmericCorps Service)
 Section 21027 Military Service Credit for Retired Persons  IRC 414(h)(2) (Pre-tax payroll deduction plan for member contributions and service credit purchase)
ARTICLE 10 – TUITION REIMBURSEMENT AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

10.1 – TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
Tuition and/or textbook costs required to complete educational courses which are taken by an employee and which pertain to their City employment, may be reimbursed to the employee by the City if reimbursement is recommended by the employee's department director and approved by the 1974
19 City Manager or designee. The employee on whose behalf the recommendation is made must also maintain a passing grade of a “C” or better, Credit/No Credit or a Certificate of Completion, which is verified by the Assistant City Manager’s receipt of an official copy of the employee's grades prior to any reimbursement.

A. The City will reimburse up to a maximum of $1,250 per fiscal year for qualifying tuition and/or textbook (including e-textbooks) costs.

B. To become eligible for tuition reimbursement, employees shall have completed one year of service prior to enrollment in such classes.

C. The parties agree that the City’s budgetary guidelines do not impact the tuition reimbursement program, nor do the guidelines prevent a represented employee from continuing to participate in tuition reimbursement for approved courses.

10.2 – PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
The City endorses outside City-paid education and training, attendance at professional meetings and conferences, and dues and memberships in job specific organizations in which the City receives specific benefits for all CMCEA represented employees. Department directors may request in the budget up to $1,000 per full-time department employee per year with appropriate justification from the employee. The up to $1,000 Professional Development budget per full-time department employee limit pertains to education/training, meetings/seminars and conferences (including travel and meals), dues and memberships. Department directors have the right to determine the benefit to the City for the professional development request, staffing requirements and funding availability.

Employees have the right to appeal to the Human Resources Division if they feel their request did not receive fair consideration by their Department Director.

CHAPTER 4 – LEAVES OF ABSENCE
ARTICLE 11 – LEAVES

11.1 – VACATIONS
A. Vacation Leave is to enable employees to spend a reasonable amount of time away from their job and to return to work refreshed. Employees accrue vacation when in paid status. If an employee is absent without pay for an entire pay period, they will not accrue vacation for that pay period. If an employee is absent without pay for a partial pay period, their accrual will be pro-rated.

B. Employees shall accrue vacation leave as follows:

Years of Service Hours Accrued Per Year Maximum Accrual

0.00 – 2.99 92 380

3.00 – 4.99 116 380

5.00 – 9.99 140 380

10.00 – 14.99 164 380

15.00 – 19.99 188 380

20.00 + 212 380
The City Manager or designee shall have discretion to start a new employee at higher accrual rate or with hours in their bank upon hire.
1975
20 C. Maximum Accumulation of Vacation Leave - All employees shall be permitted to accrue up to three hundred eighty (380) hours of vacation leave. If an employee’s vacation accrual reaches 380 hours, the employee will stop accruing additional vacation leave unless there is an exception as provided in Subsection G of this Article based on department needs. Vacation accruals will re-commence in the next pay period following the use of vacation leave that reduces the balance below the maximum accrual. It is the responsibility of the employee to manage accrued vacation time off by requesting, scheduling and using vacation to avoid not accruing vacation because they have accrued the maximum accrual. .

D. Vacation Leave Cash Outs

1. Through December 31, 2022
a. During the first payroll periods commencing on and after January 1, April 1, July 1, October 1 and the last pay period of 2022, unit members shall have the option of converting up to eighty (80) hours of earned and accrued vacation leave to cash for every forty (40) hours of vacation leave used during said quarterly period of time.
b. During the payroll period commencing each July 1, unit members shall have the option of reducing the three hundred eighty (380) hour maximum vacation leave accrual to two hundred forty (240) hours.

2. Vacation Leave Cash Out for 2023 and Thereafter
On or before the pay period which includes December 15 of each calendar year (which includes December 15, 2022), an employee may make an irrevocable election to cash out up to the maximum amount of vacation leave which they will be earned in the following calendar year at the employee’s base hourly rate of pay as follows:

An employee can cash out vacation during any quarter of the following year as long as on the date(s) chosen for cash out the employee has earned at least the amount of vacation they chose to cash out. Employees who made an irrevocable election to cash out vacation shall choose to be paid out during one or more of the following payroll periods:
 Payroll period that includes April 1st
 Payroll period that includes July 1st
 Payroll period that includes October 1st
 Final Payroll period of the calendar year
Employees will notify the Human Resources Division of which quarter(s) they wish their cash outs to be paid by the payroll deadlines as set by the Finance Department and Human Resources Division. Any remaining elected vacation hours that have not been previously paid out during the year will be paid out on the final payroll period of the calendar year.

E. Scheduling of Vacation Leave - Employees must submit vacation requests in a timely manner to ensure that requests are granted. Vacation requests will be evaluated based on each department’s operational needs taking into consideration the employee’s specific requested time off. Scheduled vacations shall only be cancelled in the event of an emergency.

F. Departmental Needs & Exception - When an employee submits a timely vacation leave request and the Supervisor and/or the Department Director must deny it due to the operational needs 1976
21 of the City and/or Department, an exception may be granted by the Department Head with a written explanation from the employee’s supervisor and advance approval from the City Manager or designee. If such an exception is granted, the employee will be paid cash for any vacation time which would accrue in excess of the maximum amount allowed to be accrued.

The payment will be processed for the pay period in question. There will be no approvals for vacation leave accrual beyond the maximum accrual level.

Should a scheduled Vacation Leave have to be cancelled by the Department Head due to the operational needs of the City/Department, and the cancellation would cause the employee to accrue above the maximum vacation accrual, an exception for a “Cash-Out” may be granted by the Department Head with a written explanation from the employee’s supervisor and advance approval from the City Manager or designee. If such an exception is granted, the employee will be paid cash for any vacation time that would accrue in excess of the maximum amount allowed to be accrued.

G. Vacation Leave Procedure

1. An employee may only take vacation leave with hours they have accrued.

2. The time during the calendar year at which an employee shall take their vacation shall be determined by the department director with particular regard for the need for the employee's services and due regard for the wishes of the employee.

3. In the event one or more municipal holidays fall within a vacation leave, the day will be considered a holiday, not vacation.

4. An employee shall not accrue vacation if on an unpaid leave of absence.

H. Terminal Vacation Pay - Upon termination, employees will paid for their vacation accrued through their date of termination at their base hourly rate of pay.

11.2 – SICK LEAVE
A. The Sick Leave Bank
All employees in the unit have a Sick Leave Bank. The Sick Leave Bank is a bank of hours that an employee can use for a bona fide illness. Effective the payroll that includes July 1 of each year, the Sick Leave Bank shall be augmented with a maximum of ninety-six (96) hours of credited sick leave, but in no case shall the annual augmentation result in more than one hundred ninety-two (192) hours in the Sick Leave Bank on July 1 of any year. (For example, if on July 1 of any year the Sick Leave Bank reflects a balance of one hundred thirty-two (132) hours, that employee’s bank would receive a sixty (60) hour augmentation. On the other hand, if the Sick Leave Bank reflected a balance of fifty (50) hours, the employee would receive a ninety-six (96) hour augmentation, resulting in a then total accumulation of one hundred forty- six (146) hours.) The sick leave hours in the Sick Leave Bank shall have no cash value, shall not be convertible to cash or to any other form of compensation.

Effective the pay period that begins on December 18, 2022 (with a pay date of January 6, 2023) employees can only accrue sick leave in the Sick Leave Bank. The Sick Leave Bank will have the following provisions:

1. Employees accrue 96 hours per year at the rate of 3.69 hours per pay period.

2. Employees can accrue up to 480 hours in the Sick Leave Bank. 1977
22 3. Any new employees hired or rehired into the unit after January 1, 2023 shall be provided with 96 hours of sick leave upon being hired. The City Manager or designee shall have discretion to start a new employee with additional hours in their sick leave bank upon hire.

B. The Secondary Sick Leave Bank.

Employees hired prior to September 21, 2014, were able to accrue sick leave into the Secondary Sick Leave Bank. Hours in this bank can still be used as sick leave when employees are sick but no sick leave is accrued in these banks and the sick leave contained in the Secondary bank have no cash value.

C. The Tertiary Sick Leave Bank
Beginning in the pay period that includes July 1, 2021, any hours remaining from the annual augmentation that were not placed in the Sick Leave Bank, will be placed in the employees Tertiary Sick Leave Bank. (For example, if on July 1 of any year, the Sick Leave Bank reflects a balance of one hundred thirty-two (132) hours, that employee’s Sick Leave Bank would receive a sixty (60) hour augmentation and the employee’s Tertiary Sick Leave Bank would receive a thirty-six (36) hour augmentation. The maximum accrual for the Tertiary Sick Leave Bank is 288 hours. The sick leave contained in the Tertiary bank have no cash value.

Effective the pay period that begins on December 18, 2022 (with a pay date of January 6, 2023), no additional hours will accrue in the tertiary bank. An employee with hours in this tertiary bank can use those hours during their employment.

D. Sick leave hours in the Sick Leave Bank and Secondary Sick Leave Bank shall be used in case of a bona fide illness of the employee. Sick leave may also be used up to one half of one year’s annual accrued sick leave (i.e., 48 hours) for serious illness or emergency of their child, parent, spouse, domestic partner, grandchild, grandparent or sibling who is incapacitated and/or requires the service of a physician, and when the presence of the employee is required. Sick leave hours in the Tertiary Sick Leave Bank shall be used in case of serious health condition of the employee, as defined by the City’s Family Care and Medical Leave Act Administration Regulation or up to one half of one year’s annual accrued sick leave (i.e., 48 hours) may be used to care for the employee’s child, parent, spouse, domestic partner, grandchild, grandparent or sibling who is experiencing a serious health condition and the employee’s presence is recommended by a physician or health care provider.

Employees can use up to 48 hours per calendar year for sick leave (from any bank in which they have an accrual for family members described in the above paragraph.

E. At the conclusion of the emergency, said employee shall return to work as soon as possible.

The employee taking such sick leave shall notify their immediate supervisor prior to or within one-half (1/2) hour after the time set for the beginning of their scheduled shift or the commencement of their work assignment, or as otherwise specified by the department. When absence is for more than three (3) scheduled shifts, the employee may be required to present a physician's release to the department director indicating that the physician is knowledgeable of the essential functions of the employee's job and that in the doctor's medical opinion that the employee is medically fit to return to the employee's regular job. If the employee is not able to perform the essential functions of their job, the physician's release must indicate what essential functions of the employee's job cannot be performed by the employee, and for how long of time the employee will be unable to perform these functions in the doctor's opinion. Said physician's release may be required by the department director. The department director shall forward the certificate to the Assistant City Manager for filing. 1978
23 F. The City Manager, upon written request, may grant that accrued sick leave may be taken by the employee when the employee's services are required by their relative which may be outside the employee's immediate household.

G. Separation from City - The sick leave hours in the any of the sick leave banks shall have no cash value, shall not be convertible to cash or to any other form of compensation. At the time of retirement from the City (defined as having applied for retirement benefits from CalPERS) an employee with sick leave in the Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sick Leave Bank can convert that sick leave to service credit at the rate of 1 day = 0.004 years of service credit.

H. Accrued vacation leave normally will be used for sickness when all of an employee's accumulated sick leave has been exhausted. An employee may volunteer to use compensatory time off when all of their accumulated sick leave has been exhausted. This accrued time may also be utilized to supplement Long Term Disability insurance, provided the supplemental does not exceed 100 percent of the employee's regular rate of pay.

I. Sick Leave During Vacation - An employee who becomes hospitalized or seriously ill or injured while on vacation may have such period charged to their accumulated sick leave instead of to the vacation provided:

1. Immediately upon return to duty, the employee submits to their department director a written request for sick leave and a written statement signed by their physician stating that the employee had a serious illness or injury and dates of their serious illness or injury.

2. The department director recommends and the City Manager approves the granting of such sick leave.
3 Other Limitations - No employee shall be entitled to accrue or to take sick leave with pay while absent from duty for any of the following reasons:
a. Disability or illness arising from employment other than with the City of Costa Mesa. b. Leave of absence without pay.
c. Absence due to any reason other than certifiable illness.

J. Penalty For Sick Leave Abuse - Employees who abuse sick leave may be denied sick leave pay, and may incur other discipline up to and including termination. When, in the judgment of the department director, the employee's reasons for being absent are inadequate, they shall change the payroll time report to indicate that the absence was leave without pay. Employees shall then have the right of appeal through the appropriate administrative processes prior to any loss of pay for suspected abuse of sick leave.

K. Extended Sick Leave - On written request of the employee and recommendation by the department director, the City Manager may authorize a leave of absence without pay for the purpose of recovering from an illness, provided:

1. The employee has used up all of their accumulated sick leave, but may retain compensatory time and vacation time.

2. The employee presents to their department director an estimate of the time needed to recover signed by a physician approved by the City.
1979
24 3. An employee returning to work from an extended sick leave will be required to obtain and provide to their supervisor and the Human Resources Division a medical certification stating that they is fit to return to work.

11.3 – ENTITLEMENT TO VACATION AND SICK LEAVE
For the purpose of computing an employee's entitlement to vacation and sick leave, an employee's continuous service shall be based on the employee's date of initial probationary employment with the City. This date shall be the employee's anniversary date for vacation and sick leave purposes subject to the provisions contained herein. An employee who leaves City employment and returns within one year, shall have the break in service reduced from the amount of continuous service. If an employee leaves City employment for more than one year and then returns to City employment, .the City Manager or designee shall have discretion to start the employee at a higher accrual rate or with hours in their bank upon hire.

11.4 – LEAVES OF ABSENCE WITH OR WITHOUT PAY
The following leaves of absence are for leaves other than statutory leaves:

A. Special Leaves of Absence Without Pay - The department director may authorize special leaves of absence without pay for a period of up to two (2) weeks (14 consecutive days).

B. Ninety (90) Calendar Days or Less - Upon the written recommendation of the department director, the City Manager or designee may authorize special leaves of absence without pay for a period or periods not to exceed ninety (90) calendar days for purposes deemed by the City Manager or designee to be beneficial to the City.

C. In Excess Of Ninety (90) Calendar Days - The City Manager may, grant leaves of absence with or without pay in excess of ninety (90) calendar days for purposes deemed by the City Manager to be beneficial to the City.

D. Continuation of Benefits - The employee shall be responsible for paying for the continuation of employee benefits when a leave of absence exceeds one (1) full pay period.

11.5 – LEAVE FOR NON OCCUPATION INJURY OR ILLNESS
The City grants employees a leave of absence due to an injury or illness that prevents them from performing or safely performing the essential functions of their positions in accord with state and federal laws.

A. An employee who requires a leave of absence for medical reasons must notify their supervisor in writing of the need for such a leave as soon as the employee learns that they is, or will become, temporarily disabled and unable to work due to the medical condition. A medical statement signed by a licensed physician must be submitted with the leave request. The medical certificate must state that the employee has a medical condition prohibiting them from performing the essential functions of their job, and must provide the anticipated length of absence and any functional limitations that the employee may have upon returning to work.

B. Unless concurrently on a Family Care and Medical Leave, an employee granted a non- occupational disability leave of absence shall utilize available accrued sick leave, and vacation time during the period of their disability. The employee may elect to use compensatory time off prior to being granted leave without pay. Paid leave must be exhausted prior to being granted leave without pay unless the employee is concurrently on a Family Care and Medical Leave. (Refer to Administrative Regulation 2.28 - Family Care and Medical Leave). 1980
25 C. An employee may continue life, health, dental and long-term disability coverages while on leave of absence without pay by paying the full cost of such coverages. The City will pay its share of the employee’s health insurance premiums for an employee on FMLA/CFRA unpaid leave of absence for up to 12 weeks. If the employee’s portion of the premiums are not paid or the employee fails to pay the premiums after 12 weeks, the employee will be terminated from coverage. (Also refer to Administrative Regulation 2.28 - Family Care and Medical Leave).

D. An employee returning from a non-occupational disability leave must provide a physician's statement that indicates that they is fit to return to work.

E. If additional leave is desired, the employee may request the additional leave in accordance with the extended leave provision in the Personnel Rules and Regulations.

An employee who returns to work at the end of their leave of absence will be returned to their former position or to a similar position for which they is qualified, unless the position has been eliminated due to layoffs.

11.6 – CATASTROPHIC ILLNESS LEAVE
The following sets forth how employees can use catastrophic illness:

A. Definition of Catastrophic Illness or Injury - An acute or prolonged illness usually considered to be life-threatening or with the threat of serious residual disability.

B. Eligibility for Catastrophic Leave - Employees may qualify for catastrophic leave if the employee or an employee’s spouse, child, parent or domestic partner is experiencing a medically verified catastrophic illness or injury that creates a financial hardship for the employee. An employee must exhaust all vacation, compensatory time, and eligible sick leave prior to using catastrophic leave donations. Employees will not be eligible to receive additional leave accruals while using catastrophic leave donations.

C. Donations - Employees will be permitted to voluntarily transfer 8 hours per pay period of accrued vacation or compensatory time, to a catastrophic leave bank of an employee who has exhausted their accrued leave banks as a result of a catastrophic illness or injury. In no event shall sick leave be donated. Donations may be made across all divisions and departments within the City.

D. Coordination with Other Paid Benefits – Employees who are receiving long-term disability or workers’ compensation benefits may supplement the benefits with catastrophic leave not to exceed their base salary. Employees will continue to be eligible for routine special and premium pays, certification pays, etc. while on catastrophic leave. “Routine” pay is defined as additional pay in which the employee receives on a continuous basis (e.g. bilingual pay, EMD pay, etc…), but does not include pays in which an employee only receives while performing a specific function and/or non-routine assignment (e.g. Matron pay, etc.). At no time, will the combination of donated leave and long-term disability or workers’ compensation benefits result in the employee receiving more than 100% of their regular wages. Catastrophic leave donations will not meet the qualifications for the flex contribution and cannot be used towards voluntary deductions (including deferred compensation, United Way deductions, etc.).

An employee requesting catastrophic leave donations must submit a completed Catastrophic Leave Request form to their department director. In the event that the employee is incapacitated and cannot complete the Catastrophic Leave Request form, the department director may submit it on the employee’s behalf.
1981
26 11.7 – MILITARY LEAVES
An employee having a probationary or regular appointment shall be entitled to such benefits as are provided in the California Military and Veterans Code and the U.S. Code. An employee requesting such military leave shall present a copy of their military orders to their department director prior to the beginning of the leave.

Employees are entitled to a temporary military leave of absence not to exceed 180 calendar days per year. Employees having more than one year continuous service and granted a military leave of absence are entitled to receive the equivalent salary up to the first 30 calendar days of any one military leave, or during any one (1) calendar year. Weekend drills are excluded from the meaning of ordered military leave. An employee who is ordered to a weekend drill can request to flex their time off during the same FLSA workweek.

11.8 – SCHOOL ACTIVITY LEAVE
CMCEA has requested that Labor Code Section 230.8, which deals with unpaid leaves of absence to participate in various school activities of an employee's dependents, specifically be referenced with this MOU. Employees may use accrued leave time or vacation time, or if no time is available, time without pay, for activities described in Labor Code 230.8. Employees are entitled to up forty (40) hours per calendar year or eight (8) hours per month of unpaid leave. The Employee will provide written verification of any such activity for which they request time off, at the request of their department director.

11.9 – REPORTING ABSENCES
An employee who is absent from duty because of illness or injury (i.e., the need to use sick leave) shall report such absence to their department director or immediate supervisor prior to the time of expected absence whenever possible, and in no case later than one-half (1/2) hour before unless an emergency prevents the employee from reporting their absence the beginning of their normal work shift. Absences not reported in such manner may be subject to disciplinary action.

11.10 – BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
Whenever an employee is compelled to be absent from duty by reason of a death or critical illness where death appears imminent of grandparent, father, mother, brother, sister, (this includes step brothers and sisters) wife, husband, or child of employee, spouse, or domestic partner such employee shall, upon approval of their department director, be entitled to charge such absence as “bereavement leave”to a maximum of five (5) working days in a calendar year. This leave may also be used in the case of a miscarriage by a female employee and/or employee whose spouse or registered domestic partner suffers a miscarriage. This would also apply in the case of a miscarriage by a surrogate.

Any additional time that may be required must be approved by the employee’s Department Head (and will be approved if required by law) and will be charged first to sick leave, then the employee can choose between vacation, compensatory time off or floating holiday leave. If all such leaves are exhausted it will be charged to unpaid leave if the employee does not have accrued sick leave, vacation compensatory time off or floating holiday leave . The City Manager or designee, upon written request, may grant bereavement leave to an employee for persons in other relationships to the employee than are listed above.

11.11 – HOLIDAY LEAVE
The following are the ten (10) designated holidays:
 New Year’s Day - January 1st
1982
27  Martin Luther King, Jr. - third Monday in January
 President’s Day - third Monday in February
 Memorial Day - Last Monday in May
 Independence Day - 4th of July
 Labor Day - 1st Monday in September
 Veteran’s Day - November 11th
 Thanksgiving Day - 4th Thursday in November
 Day after Thanksgiving - 4th Friday in November
 Christmas Day - December 25th
In the event any of the above holidays fall on Saturday, the preceding Friday will be observed. In the event any of the above holidays fall on Sunday, the following Monday will be observed.

A. In addition to the ten holidays above, employees receive sixteen (16) floating holiday hours.

Employees may schedule with their supervisor any time during the year to use the floating holiday hours. At the end of the calendar year, any remaining holiday hours will be cashed out. Employees hired after January 1 st of each year are eligible for the 16 hours of floating holiday pay on a pro-rata basis during the calendar year based on the established City holiday schedule. If an employee separates from the service of the City and has used or been paid for floating holiday pay in advance of Lincoln’s Birthday and/or California Admission Day, the City will deduct the cash value for the floating holiday benefits paid, but unearned, from the final paycheck.

B. In order to be eligible for holiday pay for the ten holidays above, an employee must either work or be on paid status the day immediately before, or after the holiday if scheduled.

C. All employees who receive time off for the above listed holidays shall receive full pay.

D. Paid Full Shifts for Holidays - When a holiday is observed by the City, employees who take the holiday off shall record on their timesheets the hours that correspond with their regular workday shift within their established workweek schedule (i.e., employees on the four ten-hour day workweek (4/10) will record 10 hours for the holiday; employees who work on a 9/80 work schedule shall record 9 hours, or 8 hours as applicable, for the holiday; and employees regularly scheduled to eight-hour workday schedules shall record 8 hours for the holiday.) E. Employees Who Work Without Regard to Holidays - Prior to the beginning of each calendar year, Police Department employees who must work without regard to the above listed holidays must irrevocably elect for the next year to either receive holiday leave (in which case they will receive one hundred and twenty (120) hours if assigned to a 4/10 or 3/12 work schedule, one hundred and eight (108) hours if assigned to a 9/80 work schedule or ninety-six (96) hours if assigned to a 5/40 work schedule) that they can use either on the actual holiday or work on the holiday and use at another time) or cash out for the holidays (in which case they will receive ninety-six (96) hours of holiday pay).

Employees who choose the cash out option will receive a holiday pay bank of 96 hours beginning the first pay period for the new payroll year. This holiday pay bank may be cashed out at any time during the year. At the end of the payroll year, any remaining holiday pay will be cashed out unless the employee previously elects to have it applied as accrued vacation.

Throughout the payroll year, if an employee, who has selected holiday pay, decides to take a holiday off, they must use either vacation or comp time, to cover the leave since they received holiday pay.

Notwithstanding the above, if due to the way the pay periods occur, an employee receives 11 or 13 holidays in the calendar year, employees who choose the cash option will receive 104 1983
28 hours (if there are 13 holidays) or 88 hours (if there are 11 holidays) beginning the first pay period of the new payroll year.

Employees who irrevocably elect (prior to the end of the calendar year for the following calendar year) to earn holiday leave rather than holiday pay will receive a bank of 96, 108, or 120 hours, depending upon their assigned work schedules. The hours will be available the first pay period of the new payroll year. Employees will have holiday leave available to use during the year, including (assuming if the employee requests and is approved for taking a holiday off, an actual holiday). However, employees must make a request to use holiday leave at least four (4) working days prior to the requested time off. Approval of the time off request will be based upon available staffing needs and the needs of the employee. At the end of the payroll year, any remaining hours in the holiday leave bank will be carried over to the next payroll year (however, the subsequent year’s bank shall be reduced by the number of hours carried over).

Notwithstanding the above, if due to the way the pay periods occur, an employee receives 11 or 13 holidays in the calendar year, employees who choose the leave option will depending on their schedule receive 104, 116 or 128 hours (if there are 13 holidays) or 88, 96 or 108 hours (if there are 11 holidays) beginning the first pay period of the new payroll year.

For employees who work without regard to holidays, to the extent permitted by law or by CalPERS, for those who take the cash out option, it will be reported as special compensation per Title 2 California Code of Regulations section 571 and 571.1 F. Employees hired after January 1 of each year are eligible for holiday pay on a pro-rata basis during the calendar year based on the established City holiday schedule. If an employee separates from the service of the City and has used or been paid for holiday pay in advance of the date(s) or day(s) the holidays actually occurred, the City will deduct the cash value for the holiday benefits paid, but unearned, at the time of separation from the final paycheck. If an employee transfers or promotes to a position not covered by this provision and the employee has been paid in advance of the date(s) or day(s) the holidays actually occurred, the employee will be required to record absence with no pay for the remainder of the holidays that year.

11.12 – JURY DUTY

1. An employee who is called for jury duty shall be compensated (as though they was working) for those hours of absence due to the jury duty that occurs during the employee’s regularly scheduled working hours. Employees are required to provide documentation to Human Resources that they are on jury duty and once completed, documentation from the court that they have completed their jury duty service. This documentation is necessary for employees to receive pay for jury duty.

2. If a unit member is required to be absent from work to report for jury duty, the employee will notify their supervisor of the absence as soon as possible, including, a phone message the night before if the employee finds out via a phone recording that they must report the next day.

3. An employee on jury duty must either return to work after the jury service is done for the day if there are still four hours or more left on their shift or call in to their supervisor and ask to use leave to cover the rest of their shift.

4. An employee who is called to jury duty on a non-working day will not receive compensation or be authorized to change their schedule as a result of being called to jury duty.

5. An employee who is scheduled for a swing or graveyard shift on a day they is called to jury service will be authorized to change their work hours in order to report to jury service under the same provisions of 1-3 above.
1984
29 6. An employee who is called to jury duty will not be subject to working their full graveyard or swing shift if there is not a minimum of 10 hours before or after assigned jury duty. If there is less than 10 hours between the end of a shift and the start of jury duty, an employee will be permitted to leave their shift early to allow for a minimum break of 10 hours. If there is less than 10 hours between the end of jury duty and the start of their shift, an employee will be able to delay their usual start time to ensure a 10-hour break in between. In this event, the employee’s usual end time will remain the same. For any additional time taken off before or after jury duty, an employee will be required to utilize paid accrued time subject to supervisor approval.

The employee is entitled to retain any mileage allowance if paid by the court.

11.13 – INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT LEAVE
A. In the event that any employee is absent from work as a result of any injury, illness or disease arising out of and during the course of employment with the City of Costa Mesa, such absence shall be considered to be industrial accident leave as specified below and nothing contained in this MOU shall be deemed to affect or limit in any manner the employee's entitlement to medical, surgical and hospital treatment as provided under California's Workers' Compensation laws.

1. Eligibility
a. If the employee is unable to perform their assigned duties due to job-related injury or illness and is entitled to Worker's Compensation Temporary Disability under the provisions of California's Workers' Compensation Act.
b. If the employee reports all on-the-job or off-the-job injury or illness which may impair their ability to perform regularly assigned duties to their supervisor within 24 hours (or the next regularly scheduled workday, whichever is sooner) of the incident, except under extenuating circumstances. Extenuating circumstances under which an employee may report an injury beyond the above limits shall include but not be limited to a report at the time the employee realizes the injury is disabling and the medical evidence is consistent with the claim. Failure to report said injury or accident may be grounds for disciplinary action. After review by the Department, said report shall then be forwarded to the Risk Management Division.
c. Medical treatment is provided and maintained by a licensed physician, chiropractor or a licensed medical practitioner as prescribed by a licensed physician, acceptable to the City's Workers' Compensation Administration. If the employee has notified the Personnel Office in writing prior to a job injury/illness, the employee's own physician may be used if said physician treats for workers’ compensation and can attest that they previously directed treatment for them and has their medical records including their medical history. After thirty days, an employee has the right to select their own physician provided the employee notifies the Workers' Compensation Administrator in writing of the doctor's name and address prior to the first appointment. The employee must also be disabled from and unable to perform any work regularly performed by a City employee that the City makes available with priority being in the employee's department and light duty availability.

2. Caveat - If the illness or injury resulted from the failure to wear prescribed safety or personal protective clothing or equipment; use provided safeguards or safety equipment; follow safety rules and regulations, or other departmental work rules; or the employee's 1985
30 gross negligence or willful misconduct was the proximate cause of the absence; the incident may be grounds for disciplinary action.

3. Administration
a. Any employee who is going to be absent from work over one week with an industrial injury shall contact his designated departmental safety representative each Thursday or any other time designated by the departmental safety representative and report their medical progress and approximate date of return to work and any other information the designated departmental safety representative deems appropriate. b. Employees on industrial leave must report any change in their normal place of residence or the address reported where they will be during normal business hours while recovering from job-related injuries or illness. Before leaving that location for a period in excess of one (1) day, they shall notify the departmental safety representative, and must be available for appointments or consultation as may be required by the City or Workers' Compensation Administrator. The departmental safety representative shall issue weekly reports to the department director with copies to the Risk Management Division advising of the employee's status. c. The employee must make available after each medical appointment a medical prognosis for the likelihood of the employee's return to their regular and/or light duty with all applicable work restrictions. Industrial leave may not be granted if a light duty job assignment is available within the employee's work restrictions. d. If further remedial action is indicated, the employee must follow a course of treatment which will enable return to full employment at the earliest possible time.

4. Denial of Industrial Leave - Industrial leave will not be approved when any of the conditions of section 1 above are not met, or when competent medical authority as outlined in 1.d of this section determines the disability to be a result of a pre-employment or non- industrial medical condition/ Industrial leave will also be denied if the leave requested is due to a medical condition for which the employee has already received a Settlement or a Compromise and Release pursuant to a prior legal action, or is requested relative to an injury or illness for which the City has previously denied industrial leave.

5. Industrial Leave will terminate when one of the following occurs:
a. The employee fails to follow the advice of the treating physician by failing to pursue a course of treatment which will lead to recovery in a timely manner. b. The employee's condition becomes medically permanent and stationary within the guidelines of the state's Workers' Compensation scheme. c. It is medically determined that the employee will never be capable of performing the duties of their classification.
d. The employee no longer qualifies for a compensable industrial leave as defined in paragraph C below.
e. The employee is engaged in outside employment or activity which would impede recovery and prolong their return to work as determined by competent medical authority.
1986
31 B. In all cases as specified in Item 8.13(A) above where sickness or injury is incurred as a result of employment and is initially compensable under California’s Worker’s Compensation laws, the employee's full regular salary for the waiting period required under such laws shall be paid by the City.

If there is a question about whether the injury or illness qualifies as an industrial injury under the state’s Workers’ Compensation laws, the City will conduct an investigation and make a determination as provided under such laws. Compensation for time off due to disability during this determination period will be maintained through the use of the employee’s personal accrued leave. If the injury is determined to be industrial, then the time off due to the disability will be converted to Industrial Accident Leave and the personal leave hours used during the determination period will be restored to the employee.

C. All regular or probationary full-time employees, shall be entitled to Industrial Accident Leave and compensation on the following basis:

When any full-time employee of the City (including probationary full time employees) qualifies for temporary disability payment under the State of California Labor Code or the Workers' Compensation benefits, the employee shall receive paid leave, after a three-day waiting period for a period not to exceed (up to) sixty-six work days (528 hours) of leave for each separate injury. An injury shall be deemed to continue through a recurrence or aggravation to the original injury. Claimed recurrences or aggravations of any injury approved for industrial leave shall be charged to the balance, if any, of the maximum allowance of such leave for the original injury.

The leave in this section is intended for compensation while the employee is disabled from work and shall not be used to attend doctor’s appointments, physical therapy, or other medical appointments when the employee is cleared to work light, modified or regular duty.

D. Employees with accepted industrial injury leave shall continue to receive a flex contribution for benefits in accordance with Section 7.3. Employees under this section will be responsible for the employee portion of health and any other cafeteria plan premiums for the duration of coverage under the plan.

11.14 – FAMILY AND MEDICAL CARE LEAVE
RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS - As required by State and Federal law ("FMLA") the City will provide family and medical care leave for eligible employees. Administrative Regulation 2.28 sets forth employees' rights and obligations with respect to such leave. Rights and obligations which are not specifically set forth therein are set forth in the Department of Labor regulations implementing the Federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA), and the regulations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) (Government Code 12945.2).

ENTITLEMENTS - Rights of qualified employees under FMLA include: (1) entitlement of up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave in a year; (2) continuation of the City's portion of any medical insurance contributions made on behalf of the employee for the duration of the leave; and (3) no loss of seniority.

CHAPTER 5 – EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
ARTICLE 12 - GRIEVANCES

12.1 – DEFINITION OF A GRIEVANCE
A "grievance" is a formal, written allegation by an employee or CMCEA (referred to as “grievant”), 1987
32 that that there has been a violation, misinterpretation or misapplication of this Memorandum of Understanding and/or provisions of the Personnel Rules and Regulations or other City policies.

Other matters for which a special method of review is provided by law, ordinance, resolution, or by administrative regulations and procedures of the City, are not within the scope of this procedure, although other methods of review may be joined with the grievance procedure where the factual basis for the review and the grievance are similar. The grievance procedure is the sole and exclusive method to resolve any grievance as defined herein.

If the employee’s grievance alleges that the City’s violation, misinterpretation or misapplication of this Memorandum of Understanding and/or provisions of the Personnel Rules and Regulations or other City policies was caused by discrimination, the grievance shall be placed in abeyance. The City will promptly conduct an investigation of the allegation of discrimination per its harassment, discrimination and retaliation policy. If there is a finding of discrimination, the City will work with the employee and/or their representative to address a remedy. If the investigation concludes that there was no discrimination, the grievant may still continue with the grievance procedure.

12.2 – GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

1. Informal Resolution: Every effort shall be made to resolve a grievance through discussion between the employee and their immediate supervisor. It is the spirit and intent of this procedure that all grievances are settled quickly and fairly without any discrimination against employees who may seek to resolve a grievance by invoking this procedure. Every effort should be made to find an acceptable solution at the lowest level of supervision. Within fifteen (15) calendar days after a grievant (either an employee or the Association) knew, or by reasonable diligence should have known, of the condition upon which a grievance may be based, the grievant shall attempt to resolve it by an informal meeting with the grievant's immediate supervisor.

2. The immediate supervisor shall render their decision in writing within fifteen (15) calendar days of the informal conference. If the problem cannot be resolved between the employee and the supervisor, the employee may, within ten (10) calendar days from the date of receiving the answer from their supervisor, request and be granted a meeting with the division manager, if one exists, in order to discuss the grievance.

3. The division head shall render their decision in writing within fifteen (15) calendar days of receiving the appeal. If the division head and employee cannot reach a solution to the grievance, the employee may, within ten (10) calendar days from the date of receiving the answer from the division manager, request, in writing, and be granted a meeting with the department director within seven (7) calendar days of the grievant’s request to discuss the grievance to try and reach a resolution which is satisfactory to the grievant. The department director shall meet with the employee within seven (7) calendar days unless the date is mutually extended between the director and the grievant. If the grievant and director cannot satisfactory resolve the grievance, the director will issue a written decision regarding the grievance within fifteen (15) calendar days after meeting with the grievant.

4. The grievant may, within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of the decision by the department director, submit a written appeal to the City Manager or designee or request grievance mediation.

5. As an alternative to proceeding directly to the final step of the grievance procedure, the parties may mutually agree to submit a grievance to mediation. A request for mediation may be presented in writing to the Assistant City Manager or designee within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date a decision was rendered by the Department director. A request for mediation will automatically suspend the normal processing of grievance until the mediation process is 1988
33 completed, or the request is denied. The Assistant City Manager shall endeavor to schedule the mediation meeting within thirty (30) calendar days. The mediation process shall be optional. Within ten (10) calendar after completion of the mediation process, assuming the mediation does not resolve the grievance, the employee may request to proceed to the final step of the grievance process.

6. Should grievance mediation not produce satisfactory resolution, the grievant may request the matter be heard by City Manager or designee, or an impartial hearing officer (arbitrator). The recommendation of an arbitrator shall be advisory to the City Manager or designee. Should the matter be submitted directly to the City Manager or designee they shall schedule a meeting or respond in writing. Each party shall pay the cost of the arbitration. A court reporter shall be retained only by mutual consent of the parties. If the grievant chooses to have the matter heard by a hearing officer (arbitrator), the grievant and City representative can agree on an arbitrator.

If the parties cannot reach agreement on an arbitrator, the Human Resources Manager or designee will send a letter to the State Mediation and Conciliation Service at PERB requesting a list of seven (7) arbitrators. Once the list is received, the representatives of the parties shall strike names until an arbitrator is chosen. The parties shall toss a coin to determine who shall strike the first name. Once the arbitrator is selected, the parties will contact the arbitrator to schedule a hearing.

7. If any of the time limits associated with any of the steps wherein an employee may appeal the determination of a prior step should elapse, the grievance shall be considered withdrawn. Time limits may be extended by mutual consent. If the supervisor or manager responding on behalf of the City fails to respond within the prescribed time limits, the grievance will be deemed to have been denied and the employee may go to the next step.

8. An employee who is a grievant may request the assistance of another person of their own choosing in preparing and presenting their grievance at any level of review. In the event the employee desires the presence of a representative who is an employee of the City, they shall make such request through the supervisor and the supervisor shall make the necessary arrangements for the employee representative to be present. Any representative of the employee must be acceptable to the Association, or said representative shall not assist the employee with the grievance.

9. The employee and/or their representative may use a reasonable amount of work time as determined by the appropriate supervisor or department director in presenting the appeal.

However, no employee shall absent himself or herself from scheduled work without first being excused by their supervisor.

10. No employee shall be required to be represented by CMCEA in processing a grievance.

11. Employees shall be assured freedom from reprisal for using the grievance procedures, or for being a witness in a grievance, by both the City and the employee organization.

12. The settlement terms of a grievance whether filed by CMCEA or an employee shall not conflict with the express provisions of this MOU.

13. A group grievance may be filed when one (1) set of circumstances or occurrences affects more than one (1) employee in the same manner or to the same extent. The group may file one (1) document which all members of the group have read and signed. Members of the group shall be limited to those who have signed the grievance. The resolution of a group grievance may not be consistent among all employees in the group grievance due to differences in the circumstances or occurrences that brought about the grievance. 1989
34 ARTICLE 13 - DISCIPLINE

13.1 – BASIS FOR DISCIPLINE
The tenure of every City employee shall be based on reasonable standards of personal conduct and job performance. Failure to meet such standards shall be grounds for appropriate disciplinary action, which shall be commensurate with the seriousness of the offense and with consideration of the employee's prior performance record. Disciplinary action shall be based upon any of the following grounds, but is not limited to only these grounds:

A. Fraud in securing employment or making a materially false statement on an application for employment or on any supporting documents furnished with or made a part of any application.

B. Incompetence such as failure to comply with the minimum standards for an employee's position for a reasonable period of time.

C. Neglect of duty, such as failure to perform the duties required of an employee's position.

D. Willful disobedience and insubordination such as a willful failure to submit to duly appointed and acting supervision or to conform to duly established orders or directions of persons in a supervisory position.

E. Dishonesty involving employment.

F. Using or being under the influence of alcohol or intoxicating drugs while on duty without a prescription. Bringing alcohol or controlled substances onto any City work premises, or onto any location where City business or services are performed by City employees.

G. Addiction to or habitual use of alcoholic beverages, narcotics or any habit forming drug.

H. Inexcusable absence without leave.

I. Conviction of a felony or conviction of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude. A plea or verdict of guilty, or a conviction following a plea of nolo contendere, to a charge of a felony or any offense involving moral turpitude is deemed to be a conviction within the meaning of this section.

J. Discourteous treatment of the public.

K. Improper or unauthorized use of City property.

L. Violation of the rules and regulations of any department.

M. Any act of conduct undertaken which, either during or outside of duty hours, is of such a nature that it causes discredit to fall upon the City, the employee's department or division.

N. Failure to maintain proper conduct during working hours causing discredit to the employee's department or division. Such as:

1. Fighting or causing an assault on a fellow worker, citizen or any other person while employed by the City.

2. Abusing City records or information obtained while in the employ of the City. 1990
35 3. Falsification of City records.

4. Threats of bodily harm perpetrated at work, or toward fellow workers.

5. Failure to observe work schedules, including lunch periods and breaks.

6. Consistent failure to perform work assignments in an acceptable manner or at an acceptable level of output.

7. Destruction of City property.

8. Engaging in any sort of harassment (sexual, racial, ethnic, religious, etc.)

9. Intentionally treating other employees differently because of their race, sex, age, religion, national origin, marital status, physical or mental disability, sexual preference or other protected category.

O. Abuse of sick leave.

P. Inattention to duty, tardiness, indolence, carelessness or negligence in the care and handling of City property.

Q. The employee's failure to resolve a physical or mental infirmity(s) or defect(s), when it is within the capacity of the employee to do so and when directed by their supervisor.

R. Outside employment which conflicts with the employee's position and is not specifically authorized by the department director.

S. Acceptance from any source of any emolument, reward, gift or other form of remuneration in addition to the employee's regular compensation, as a personal benefit to the employee for actions performed in the normal course of the employee's assigned duties.

T. Falsification of any City report or record, or of any report or record required to be, or, filed by the employee.

U. Violation of any of the provisions of the City Code, ordinances, resolutions, or any rules, regulations or policies which may be prescribed by the City Council, City Manager, department manager or supervisor.

V. Political activities precluded by Local, State or Federal law.

W. Other acts which are incompatible with service to the public.

13.2 – TYPES OF DISCIPLINE
Types of discipline include the following: warning/reprimand, suspension, demotion or reduction in pay and dismissal. Voluntary demotions as well as performance evaluations are not considered disciplinary actions. The appeal or the review of a performance evaluation is limited to the supervisor's supervisor, whomever that may be. The following procedures shall be followed when, in the judgment of the department director, an employee has committed an act or omission that justified the disciplinary action indicated. Except for written warnings/reprimands, the department director or their designee shall advise employees of contemplated disciplinary actions in writing and allow the employee an opportunity to respond to such charges prior to taking action.

When life, or employee safety, is endangered, or the self-control of an employee is questionable, a 1991
36 supervisor shall take immediate action to reduce or eliminate the danger or to establish control. In case of an emergency, an employee shall have all of the rights set forth herein, except, in the discretion of the Department Directors, Assistant City Manager, City Manager or designee, an employee may be placed on administrative leave with pay pending pre-disciplinary procedures.

A. Warning/Reprimand: If the warning/reprimand is in writing it should be signed by the employee acknowledging receipt. The department shall give the employee a copy and forward a copy to the Assistant City Manager for review and retention in the employee's personal history file. A written warning/reprimand shall contain a description of the events which necessitated the action, specific expectations of change by the employee, and notice of further action in the event a change by the employee does not occur. An employee shall have the right to attach a written rebuttal and/or file an appeal.

B. Suspension: A department director or their designee may suspend an employee with or without pay from their position. Any placement of an employee on administrative leave pending pre-disciplinary response shall be with pay. The Department Director shall advise the Assistant City Manager in writing of such intended action and shall give a copy of such statement to the employee. The written statement shall contain a description of the events which necessitated the suspension, a statement of the charges, notification that the employee may review and be provided with the materials leading to the suspension, the right of the employee to meet with the Department Director and/or to respond in writing within a reasonable time frame to the charges, and notice of further action in the event a change by the employee does not occur. Unless extended by approval of the City Manager or designee on written recommendation of the department director, the maximum period of suspension shall be thirty (30) calendar days. These procedures are available prior to the implementation of discipline.

Disciplinary actions involving suspensions of four (4) work days or less, as well as oral and written reprimands are not exempt from the notification requirements. However, in such disciplinary actions the employee does not have the right to respond to the Department Director prior to the effective date of the proposed action.

C. Demotion or Reduction in Pay: A department director shall advise the Assistant City Manager in writing of their intention to demote or reduce the salary of an employee prior to taking such action. In demoting an employee or reducing their salary, the department director shall make a written notice and shall give a copy of said notice for demotion or reduction in pay to the employee and forward a copy to the Assistant City Manager for review and retention in the employee's personal history file. The written statement shall contain a description of the events which necessitated the demotion, a statement of the charges, notification that the employee may review and be provided with the materials leading to the demotion, the right of the employee to meet with the Department Director and/or respond in writing within a reasonable time frame to the charges, and notice of further action in the event a change by the employee does not occur.

D. Dismissal: A department director shall advise the Assistant City Manager in writing of their intention to dismiss an employee prior to taking such action. In dismissing an employee, the department director shall make a written notice and shall give a copy of said notice of dismissal to the employee and forward a copy to the Assistant City Manager for review and retention in the employee's personal history file. The written statement shall contain a description of the events which necessitated the dismissal, a statement of the charges, notification that the employee may review and be provided with the materials leading to the dismissal, and the right of the employee to meet with the Department Director and/or respond in writing within a reasonable time frame to the charges. These procedures are pre- disciplinary in nature.
1992
37 13.3 – NOTICES
Written notices will be given to the employee in person whenever possible and the employee's signature obtained to indicate receipt. In the absence of personal service, the notice may be sent by certified mail.

13.4 – EMPLOYEE’S RESPONSE
An employee's opportunity to respond to the Department Director is not intended to be adversarial in nature. An employee has the right to have a representative of their own choosing at the meeting.

The employee need not be accorded the opportunity to cross-examine a department's witnesses, nor to present a formal case in opposition to the proposed discipline. However, the limited nature of this response does not obviate the Department Director’s responsibility to initiate further investigation if the employee's version of the facts raises doubts as to the accuracy of the department director's information leading to the discipline proposal. An employee may elect not to respond, thereby waiving any further pre-disciplinary response.

The Department Director will evaluate the proposed discipline in light of the employee's response, if any. Within five (5) working days of the employee's response, or deadline for response, a decision will be transmitted in writing to the employee. Service of the decision will be in person or by certified mail.

13.5 – APPEAL PROCEDURE
Major Discipline
Any permanent employee in the classified service shall have the right to appeal any termination, suspension of forty (40) hours or more, denial of a merit increase, reduction in salary, or non- probationary demotion. The appeal process shall not be applicable to probationary employees. The appeal process shall not be applicable to verbal reprimands and performance evaluations.

An employee desiring to appeal the Department Director's decision shall have ten (10) calendar days after receipt of the response to file an appeal. The employee's request for appeal must be addressed to the Assistant City Manager and received in the Human Resources Division so that same is date stamped by the Human Resources Division within the 10-day period.

If, within the 10-day appeal period, the employee involved does not file said appeal, unless good cause for the failure is shown, the action of the Department Director shall be considered conclusive and shall take effect as prescribed. If, within the 10-day appeal period, the employee involved files such notice of appeal by giving written notice of appeal to the Human Resources Division, an arbitration appeal hearing shall be established as follows (the discipline shall nonetheless be implemented concurrent with the Department Director’s determination, subject to later modification as may result from the appeal process):

A. The employee shall file a written request with the Human Resources Division for advisory arbitration to the City Manager or designee. The City and employee will be responsible for all arbitration-related expenses, excluding attorney fees and staff time.

B. If the employee chooses to have the matter heard by a hearing officer (arbitrator), the employee’s representative and City representative can agree on an arbitrator. If the parties cannot reach agreement on an arbitrator, the Human Resources Manager or designee will send a letter to the State Mediation and Conciliation Service at PERB requesting a list of seven (7) arbitrators. Once the list is received, the representatives of the parties shall strike names until an arbitrator is chosen.

The parties shall toss a coin to determine who shall strike the first name. Once the arbitrator is 1993
38 selected, the parties will contact the arbitrator to schedule a hearing C. The selected arbitrator shall serve as the hearing officer.

D. Where practicable, the date for a hearing shall not be less than 20 calendar days, nor more than 60 calendar days, from the date of the filing of the appeal with the Assistant City Manager. The parties may stipulate to a longer or shorter period of time in which to hear the appeal. All interested parties shall be notified in writing of the date, time, and place of hearing.

E. All hearings shall be private provided, however, that the hearing officer shall, at the request of the employee, open the hearing to the public.

F. Subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum pertaining to a hearing shall be issued at the request of either party, not less than seven (7) calendar days, prior to the commencement of such hearing.

After the commencement of such hearing, subpoenas shall be issued only at the discretion of the hearing officer.

G. The hearing need not be conducted in accordance with technical rules relating to evidence and witnesses. Any relevant evidence shall be admitted if it is the sort of evidence on which reasonable persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs, regardless of the existence of any common law or statutory rules which might make improper admission of such evidence over objection in civil actions. Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining any direct evidence but shall not be sufficient in itself to support a finding unless it would be admissible over objection in civil actions. The rules of privilege shall be effective to the same extent that they are now or hereafter may be recognized in civil actions, and irrelevant and unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded. The hearing officer shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. The hearing officer shall rule on the admission or exclusion of evidence.

H. Each party shall have these rights: To be represented by legal counsel or other person of their choice; to call and examine witnesses; to introduce evidence; to cross-examine opposing witnesses on any matter relevant to the issues even though that matter was not covered in the direct examination; to impeach any witness regardless of which party first called their to testify; and to rebut the evidence against their. The employee, may be called by the party bearing the burden of proof and examined as if under cross-examination. Oral evidence shall be taken only on oath or affirmation. A court reporter will be engaged to record the hearing, unless the parties (City, hearing officer, employee/employee representative) mutually agree that same is not necessary.

I. The hearing shall proceed in the following order, unless the hearing officer, for special reason, otherwise directs:

1. The party imposing discipline shall be permitted to make an opening statement;

2. The appealing party shall then be permitted to make an opening statement;

3. The party imposing disciplinary action shall produce the evidence on their part; the City bears the burden of proof and burden of producing evidence;

4. The party appealing from such disciplinary action may then open their defense and offer their evidence in support thereof; the employee bears the burden of proof and the burden of producing evidence for any affirmative defenses asserted;

5. The parties may then, in order, respectively offer rebutting evidence only, unless the hearing officer for good reason, permits them to offer evidence upon their original case; 1994
39 6. Closing arguments shall be permitted and written briefs may be permitted at the discretion of the hearing officer.

J. The hearing officer shall determine relevancy, weight, and credibility of testimony and evidence.

They shall base their findings on the preponderance of evidence. During the examination of a witness, all other witnesses, except the parties and Personnel Division representatives, shall be excluded from the hearing unless the hearing officer, in their discretion, for good cause, otherwise directs. No still photographs, moving pictures, or television pictures shall be taken in the hearing chamber during a hearing. The hearing officer, prior to or during a hearing, may grant a continuance for any reason they believes to be important to reaching a fair and proper decision. The hearing officer shall render their judgment as soon after the conclusion of the hearing as possible and in no event later than 30 days after conducting the hearing. Their decision shall set forth which charges, if any, are sustained and the reasons therefore. The opinion shall set forth findings of fact and conclusions.

K. The hearing officer may recommend sustaining or rejecting any or all of the charges filed against the employee. They may recommend sustaining, rejecting, or modifying the disciplinary action invoked against the employee.

L. The hearing officer's opinion and recommendation shall be filed with the City Manager or designee, and the Assistant City Manager and shall set forth their findings and recommendations. If it is a dismissal hearing and a dismissal is not the hearing officer's recommendation, the opinion shall set forth the date the employee is recommended to be reinstated and/or other recommended action. The reinstatement date, if appropriate, may be any time on or after the date of disciplinary action.

M. The decision of the City Manager or Assistant City Manager shall be final and conclusive. Copies of the City Manager's or designee’s decision, including the hearing officer's recommendation(s) shall be filed where appropriate, including the employee's personnel file, unless no discipline is upheld by the City Manager or designee.

N. Each party will be responsible for all arbitration-related expenses, excluding attorney fees and staff time. Each party shall bear its own witness and attorney fees. If either party unilaterally cancels or postpones a scheduled hearing, thereby resulting in a fee charged by the hearing officer or court reporter, then the party responsible for the cancellation or postponement shall be solely responsible for payment of that fee. This process shall not apply to mutual settlements by the parties which result in an arbitration fee.

O. In the case of suspension, demotion, reduction in salary, or dismissal prescribed by the City Manager or designee, the time of such suspension, demotion or dismissal shall be effective from the first day after such delivery of said decision by the City Manager or designee, whichever is applicable.

P. The employee may be placed on administrative leave until resolution/conclusion of the appeals process.

Q. The provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall be applicable to proceedings under this section, including the appeal the City Manager’s or designee’s final decision into the California Court System, which must be made in accordance to the time standards and procedures established by Section 1094.6 and 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Minor Discipline
Any permanent employee in the classified service shall have the right to appeal any written reprimand and/or suspension of four (4) days or less. The appeal process shall not be applicable to 1995
40 those positions which may be deemed exempt from the classified service or to probationary employees.

If the problem cannot be resolved between the employee and the supervisor, the employee may, within ten (10) calendar days from the date of receiving the answer from their supervisor, request and be granted an interview with the department director or their designee, in order to discuss the appeal.

The department director or designee shall render their decision in writing within fifteen (15) calendar days of receiving the appeal. If the department director and employee are unable to arrive at a satisfactory solution, the employee may, within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of the decision by the department director, submit a written appeal to the City Manager or designee. The City Manager or designee will respond or their designee will respond or schedule a meeting within fifteen (15) calendar days. The City Manager or designee shall render their judgment as soon after the conclusion of the hearing as possible and in no event later than 30 days after conducting the hearing. Their decision shall set forth which charges, if any, are sustained and the reasons therefore.

The opinion shall set forth findings of fact and conclusions.

ARTICLE 14 – LAYOFF PROCEDURES

14.1 – PURPOSE
Employees covered by this MOU may be laid off due to material changes in the essential duties of their job or due to material changes in the organization. Likewise, the shortage of work or funds available to the City may also cause layoffs. In addition, in the event that the grant funding is no longer available, the position may be eliminated. Grant funded/limited term employees may be laid off out of seniority. If a layoff is deemed necessary, the Department Directors or Assistant City Manager shall notify the City Manager or designee of the layoff with reasons therefore thirty (30) calendar days before the effective date of layoff. Said employee shall be considered for re- employment as provided by the Personnel Rules.

14.2 – PROCEDURE
When a position within a class is abolished thereby necessitating a layoff, the following procedure shall be followed:

A. Reductions in the workforce shall be made by class within a department except that, where appropriate, the City Manager or designee may authorize a layoff by division or smaller unit within a department. In the event of a comprehensive reduction in the workforce, the City Manager or designee may decide to lay off by class City-wide regardless of department.

B. In accordance with Rule 14, Section 9 of the Personnel Rules and Regulations, thirty (30) calendar days before the effective date of layoff, the Department Directors or Assistant City Manager shall notify the City Manager or designee of the intended action with reasons therefore In the event a decision is made by the City to contract out for a specific service performed by City employees, the City will give the affected employees a minimum of six (6) months advance notification in which to evaluate their own situation and assist in planning for the future. The City shall meet and consult with CMCEA on such matters as the timing of the layoff and the number and identity of the employees affected by the layoff.

C. A reassignment or voluntary demotion within the employee's division or department to an equivalent or lower job class may be made to prevent a layoff, provided the employee is qualified by education and/or experience, is capable of performing the duties of the classification and has satisfactory performance evaluations for the preceding two (2) years. An 1996
41 employee so reassigned or demoted shall be placed on the salary step within the new classification range closest to the rate of pay which the employee previously received.

Whenever an employee is reassigned or demoted to a vacant position in the same class, an equivalent class, or lower class as herein provided, they shall retain the same anniversary date for purposes of merit pay increases. An employee so reassigned or demoted shall be reinstated to their former job class and salary step status when positions in the former job class within the affected division or department become vacant, provided that the employee has performed satisfactorily in the current position and requests reinstatement to the former position. Such reinstatement shall be on the basis of City-wide seniority.

D. In the event of a layoff, those employees in the classification affected with the least City-wide seniority shall be laid off first. Seniority shall be defined as continuous City service based upon hire date. Strict application of seniority shall prevail unless exceptional circumstances occur of which the concerned employee organization shall be fully apprised in advance. The order of layoff shall be:

1. Part-time and temporary employees in the affected classification shall be separated first.

2. Probationary employees in the affected classification shall be separated next.

3. Permanent employees with the least City seniority will be laid off first. Other affected employees will be laid off in sequential order thereafter.

4. Exceptional circumstances, as used above, includes the City's maintenance of a qualified workforce of competent employees based upon the persons employed having satisfactory performance evaluations for the preceding two (2) years.

5. Exceptional circumstances also include the recognition of the need to retain employees possessing special technical skill, training or knowledge within an affected classification as dictated by the work or services being performed. This exception can only be applied to those classifications within the occupational series utilizing said skills, knowledge or training. The determination to grant such an exception can be made only with the approval of the City Manager or designee. The City will share the findings of any proposed exception with CMCEA prior to making any recommendation to the City Manager or designee.

6. Employees who have not successfully completed promotional probation by the layoff notification date shall revert back to the last class in which the employee held permanent status for purposes of determining order of layoff.

7. When two (2) or more employees have equal seniority, the department shall determine the layoff order for these employees based upon merit and ability as determined by their performance evaluations for the preceding two (2) years and possession of specific technical skills utilized in the job.

E. An employee scheduled to be laid off is entitled to displace, or "bump," into a position in a classification within the same occupational series which is currently being held by an incumbent with less overall City seniority, provided it is in a position in which the employee formerly held permanent status or one in which the employee is qualified by education and/or experience, and is capable of performing.. The employee must exercise their displacement rights in writing within five (5) working days from receipt of layoff notification.

F. When the employee with the least City seniority is displaced by the person scheduled for layoff, the displaced employee shall be considered as laid off for the same reason as the person who 1997
42 displaced him or her and shall in the same manner be eligible to displace to a position in the same manner as described above.

G. An employee laid off from City employment shall be eligible for the same sick leave payoff as defined in the Sick Leave Incentive Program for retirees.

H. The name of an employee who has been laid off due to the reduction in the workforce shall be placed on the reemployment list for their job class. The reemployment list shall be used by all appointing authorities within the affected division or department whenever a vacancy for that class is to be filled. Names will remain on the appropriate reemployment list for a period of three (3) years from the date of separation. Persons on the reemployment list shall be reemployed within the division or department from which they were laid off at their former salary step status when positions in their former job class become vacant. Reemployment shall be on the basis of previous City seniority. After separation from City employment for more than one (1) year, a person rehired may be required to successfully pass a physical and competency examination.

I. Whenever an employee is reemployed to a vacant position in their former job class, they shall be given a new anniversary date for purposes of merit pay increases and performance reviews in accordance with the provisions of the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations.

J. An employee rehired from the reemployment list shall be considered to have continuous service for seniority purposes and may be credited with the amount of accumulated vacation and sick leave they had accrued at the time of layoff if they remits to the City of Costa Mesa the payments received by the employee under the City's separation provisions and the Sick Leave Incentive Program.

K. Failure to return to work from layoff within twenty-one (21) calendar days after notice to return has been served upon the former employee by certified or registered mail at their last known address on file with the City’s Human ResourcesDivision shall constitute the employee's waiver of any right to return to work and eliminates any future reemployment requirements placed on the City.

L. All other benefits or programs in effect at the time of layoff shall be forfeited upon reemployment unless they are still applied to the old classification at the time of rehire or provided to new hires as of that date.

Employees subject to layoff may file a grievance under Rule 25 of the Personnel Rules and Regulations only if there has been an improper interpretation or misapplication of this procedure.

ARTICLE 15 – UNIFORM APPLICATION OF RULES
To attempt to maximize the uniform application of policies and rules, the City has an interest in providing training and information to assist employees in understanding their rights. Through the committed efforts of both the City's Human Resources Division and CMCEA, attempts will be made to resolve any related problems utilizing processes such as supervisory training, explanation of the harassment policy and informal grievance procedures.
1998
43 ARTICLE 16 – COST OF SERVICES

16.1 – POLICY
It is in the interest of the City of Costa Mesa and CMCEA to establish a consistent policy regarding the City's approach to evaluating the cost of providing municipal services on a regular basis in which CMCEA has an interest. It is recognized that as prudent professionals, the ongoing evaluation of costs should be a collective process of sharing information on a participative basis to develop sound decisions and appropriate practices. The City is interested in involving the employee associations to the greatest degree in this regard; and, as such, agrees to make them part of discussions regarding the contracting out of bargaining unit work.

16.2 – CONTRACTING OUT
It is further agreed that should a decision be made to contract out for a specific service which is at the time being performed by employees covered by this MOU, the employees affected will be given sufficient notice (a minimum of six months) in which to evaluate their own situation and plan for their future. To this end, the City will make every effort to transfer and utilize regular attrition in making the necessary adjustments. The City will assist employees in this endeavor through training and through preferential treatment (under meritorious consideration) when filing vacancies.

ARTICLE 17 – TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT IN CMCEA-REPRESENTED POSITIONS The City agrees to adhere to the hours limitation as outlined in Administrative Regulation 2.7 to ensure that temporary employees are not hired into vacated CMCEA-represented positions for long durations.

ARTICLE 18 – LABOR MANAGEMENT DISCUSSIONS
In the absence of contract re-openers, the City and CMCEA agree to meet not more than twice in a calendar year to discuss issues of mutual interest which may be subject to the meet-and-confer process. This MOU can be only amended by the written agreement of both sides.

ARTICLE 19 - SUPERVISORY JOB CLASSIFICATIONS
The employees in the classifications identified on Appendix A have been determined by the City Manager or designee to be supervisory employees. A “supervisory” employee is one who has recommendation authority to hire, transfer, suspend, layoff, recall, promote, discharge, assign, evaluate or discipline other employees, and/or responsibility to direct employees.

ARTICLE 20 - PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS
All applicable City Personnel Rules and Regulations (which have not been included herein) should be reviewed by employees as they may apply to them. If there is any conflict between this MOU and the Personnel Rules, the MOU provision shall apply.

ARTICLE 21 – BENEFIT REVIEW COMMITTEE
The Association shall maintain two representatives on the City’s Benefit Review Committee. The Committee continually evaluates the City’s benefit programs and makes recommendations on plan changes, benefit levels, payroll deductions and the addition or deletion of plans. Participation on the Benefit Review Committee meets the City’s obligation to negotiate with the associations on changes to the City’s group benefit plans unless an association determines that such changes are detrimental to the interest of its members.
1999
44 REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COSTA

MESA CITY EMPLOYEES

ASSOCIATION (CMCEA)

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF

COSTA MESA
ROBERT P. GONZALEZ
CMCEA President and
Negotiations Team Member

LORI ANN FARRELL HARRISON
City Manager

ARASH RAHIMIAN
CMCEA Negotiations Team Member

KASAMA LEE
Human Resources Manager
PAUL M. MACKINEN
CMCEA Negotiations Team Member
ALMA L. REYES
Assistant to the City Manager

RYAN BOHR
CMCEA Negotiations Team Member
CAROL L. MOLINA
Finance Director

KELLY DALTON
CMCEA Negotiations Team Member
PETER J. BROWN
Labor Negotiator

TIA GRASSO
OCEA Associate General Counsel
2000
45 APPENDIX A
CMCEA Classifications
Accountant Custody Supervisor Plan Checker
Accounting Specialist I Economic Development Administrator Police Records Administrator Accounting Specialist II Electrical Inspector* Police Records Bureau Supervisor Accounting Supervisor Electronics Technician Police Records Shift Supervisor Active Transportation Coordinator Emergency Medical Services Coordinator Police Records Technician Administrative Assistant Emergency Services Administrator Police Training Administrator Animal Control Officer Emergency Services Training Specialist Police Training Assistant Arts Specialist Engineering Technician I* Principal Civil Engineer* Assistant Engineer* Engineering Technician II* Principal Planner Assistant Fire Marshal Engineering Technician III* Programmer Analyst I Assistant Planner Equipment Mechanic I* Programmer Analyst II Assistant Recreation Supervisor Equipment Mechanic II* Property/Evidence Specialist Assistant Storekeeper Equipment Mechanic III* Property/Evidence Supervisor Associate Engineer* Executive Assistant Public Right of Way Coordinator* Associate Planner Facilities Maintenance Technician* Purchasing Supervisor Building Inspector I* Fairview Park Administrator* Range Master Building Inspector II* Financial Analyst Recreation Coordinator Building Technician I Fire Protection Analyst Recreation Specialist Building Technician II Fire Protection Specialist Recreation Supervisor Business License Inspector Grant Administrator Revenue Supervisor Buyer Graphics Designer Senior Accountant
Central Services Supervisor Lead Equipment Mechanic* Senior Code Enforcement Officer Chief Construction Inspector* Lead Facilities Maintenance Technician* Senior Combination Inspector* Chief Plans Examiner Lead Maintenance Worker* Senior Communications Officer Chief of Code Enforcement Maintenance Assistant* Senior Communications Supervisor Chief of Inspection* Maintenance Superintendent* Senior Electrical Inspector* Civilian Investigator Maintenance Supervisor* Senior Engineer* Code Enforcement Officer Maintenance Worker* Senior Lead Maintenance Worker* Communications Installer Management Aide Senior Maintenance Technician* Communications Officer Management Analyst Senior Maintenance Worker* Communications Supervisor Messenger Senior Management Analyst Community Outreach Worker Network Systems Administrator Senior Planner Community Outreach Supervisor Office Coordinator Senior Police Records Technician Community Services Specialist Office Specialist Senior Programmer Analyst Construction Inspector* Office Specialist I Storekeeper* Contract Administrator* Office Specialist II Tax Auditing Specialist Court Liaison Officer Offset Press Operator I Treasury Specialist Crime Analyst Offset Press Operator II Video Production Coordinator Crime Prevention Specialist Park Ranger Video Production Specialist Crime Scene Investigation Supervisor Permit Processing Specialist Website Coordinator Crime Scene Investigator Personal Computer/Network Assistant Zoning Administrator Custody Officer Plan Check Engineer
Classifications in bold denote supervisory classifications *Classifications eligible for safety shoe allowance
2001
Attachment 2

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,

CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE PAY RANGES FOR JOB CLASSIFICATIONS

REPRESENTED BY THE COST A MESA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION PURSUANT TO THE 2022 - 2025 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on June 7, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- 35, revising the pay ranges for job classifications represented by the Costa Mesa City Employees Association, effective June 19, 2022; and
WHEREAS, on September 6, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- 59, establishing the new job classification of Custody Supervisor and pay ranges for the new classification; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to repeal and replace Resolution No. 2022- 35 and 2022-59 to revise the pay ranges for the classifications specified herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

SECTION 1. The following pay ranges and monthly rates of pay for the identified job classifications are hereby established and placed under the Basic Salary Administration Plan effective the pay period that includes pay date of January 6, 2023 .

The monthly rate of p ay may also be in increments between the monthly minimum and maximum pay step.

Class Class Title Salary Grade Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Code Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0062 Accountant CMC 644 $6,641 $6,973 $7,322 $7,688 $8,072 $8,476 $8,900 Monthly $79,692 $83,676 $87,864 $92,256 $96,864 $101,712 $106,800 Annual $38.31 $40.23 $42.24 $44.35 $46.57 $48.90 $51.35 Hourly

0061 Accounting Specialist I CMC 577 $4,197 $4,407 $4,627 $4,858 $5,101 $5,356 $5,624 Monthly $50,364 $52,884 $55,524 $58,296 $61,212 $64,272 $67,488 Annual $24.21 $25.43 $26.69 $28.03 $29.43 $30.90 $32.45 Hourly

2002
Attachment 2

0060 Accounting Specialist II CMC 606 $4,850 $5,092 $5,347 $5,614 $5,895 $6,190 $6,499 Monthly $58,200 $61,104 $64,164 $67,368 $70,740 $74,280 $77,988 Annual $27.98 $29.38 $30.85 $32.39 $34.01 $35.71 $37.49 Hourly

0066 Accounting Supervisor CMC 697 $7,753 $8,141 $8,548 $8,975 $9,424 $9,895 $10,390 Monthly $93,036 $97,692 $102,576 $107,700 $113,088 $118,740 $124,680 Annual $44.73 $46.97 $49.32 $51.78 $54.37 $57.09 $59.94 Hourly

0107 Active Transportation CMC 732 $8,928 $9,374 $9,843 $10,335 $10,852 $11,395 $11,965 Monthly Coordinator $107,136 $112,488 $118,116 $124,020 $130,224 $136,740 $143,580 Annual $51.51 $54.08 $56.79 $59.63 $62.61 $65.74 $69.03 Hourly

0013 Administrative Assistant CMC 590 $4,929 $5,175 $5,434 $5,706 $5,991 $6,291 $6,606 Monthly $59,148 $62,100 $65,208 $68,472 $71,892 $75,492 $79,272 Annual $28.44 $29.86 $31.35 $32.92 $34.56 $36.29 $38.11 Hourly

0469 Animal Control Officer CMC 617 $5,495 $5,770 $6,059 $6,362 $6,680 $7,014 $7,365 Monthly $65,940 $69,240 $72,708 $76,344 $80,160 $84,168 $88,380 Annual $31.70 $33.29 $34.96 $36.70 $38.54 $40.47 $42.49 Hourly

0307 Arts Specialist CMC 733 $5,415 $5,686 $5,970 $6,269 $6,582 $6,911 $7,257 Monthly $64,980 $68,232 $71,640 $75,228 $78,984 $82,932 $87,084 Annual $31.24 $32.80 $34.44 $36.17 $37.97 $39.87 $41.87 Hourly

0103 Assistant Engineer CMC 672 $6,866 $7,209 $7,569 $7,947 $8,344 $8,761 $9,199 Monthly $82,392 $86,508 $90,828 $95,364 $100,128 $105,132 $110,388 Annual $39.61 $41.59 $43.67 $45.85 $48.14 $50.54 $53.07 Hourly

0217 Assistant Fire Marshal CMC 897 $6,825 $7,166 $7,524 $7,900 $8,295 $8,710 $9,146 Monthly $81,900 $85,992 $90,288 $94,800 $99,540 $104,520 $109,752 Annual $39.38 $41.34 $43.41 $45.58 $47.86 $50.25 $52.77 Hourly

0151 Assistant Planner CMC 889 $6,340 $6,657 $6,990 $7,339 $7,706 $8,091 $8,496 Monthly $76,080 $79,884 $83,880 $88,068 $92,472 $97,092 $101,952 Annual $36.58 $38.41 $40.33 $42.34 $44.46 $46.68 $49.02 Hourly

0301 Assistant Recreation CMC 625 $5,415 $5,686 $5,970 $6,269 $6,582 $6,911 $7,257 Monthly Supervisor $64,980 $68,232 $71,640 $75,228 $78,984 $82,932 $87,084 Annual $31.24 $32.80 $34.44 $36.17 $37.97 $39.87 $41.87 Hourly

2003
Attachment 2

0808 Assistant Storekeeper CMC 571 $4,190 $4,399 $4,619 $4,850 $5,093 $5,348 $5,615 Monthly $50,280 $52,788 $55,428 $58,200 $61,116 $64,176 $67,380 Annual $24.17 $25.38 $26.65 $27.98 $29.38 $30.85 $32.39 Hourly

0104 Associate Engineer CMC 699 $8,604 $9,034 $9,486 $9,960 $10,458 $10,981 $11,530 Monthly $103,248 $108,408 $113,832 $119,520 $125,496 $131,772 $138,360 Annual $49.64 $52.12 $54.73 $57.46 $60.33 $63.35 $66.52 Hourly

0152 Associate Planner CMC 649 $7,291 $7,656 $8,039 $8,441 $8,863 $9,306 $9,771 Monthly $87,492 $91,872 $96,468 $101,292 $106,356 $111,672 $117,252 Annual $42.06 $44.17 $46.38 $48.70 $51.13 $53.69 $56.37 Hourly

0132 Building Inspector I CMC 643 $6,448 $6,770 $7,109 $7,464 $7,837 $8,229 $8,640 Monthly $77,376 $81,240 $85,308 $89,568 $94,044 $98,748 $103,680 Annual $37.20 $39.06 $41.01 $43.06 $45.21 $47.48 $49.85 Hourly

0138 Building Inspector II CMC 866 $6,770 $7,109 $7,464 $7,837 $8,229 $8,640 $9,072 Monthly $81,240 $85,308 $89,568 $94,044 $98,748 $103,680 $108,864 Annual $39.06 $41.01 $43.06 $45.21 $47.48 $49.85 $52.34 Hourly

0130 Building Technician I CMC 581 $4,590 $4,820 $5,061 $5,314 $5,580 $5,859 $6,152 Monthly $55,080 $57,840 $60,732 $63,768 $66,960 $70,308 $73,824 Annual $26.48 $27.81 $29.20 $30.66 $32.19 $33.80 $35.49 Hourly

0131 Building Technician II CMC 613 $5,386 $5,655 $5,938 $6,235 $6,547 $6,874 $7,218 Monthly $64,632 $67,860 $71,256 $74,820 $78,564 $82,488 $86,616 Annual $31.07 $32.63 $34.26 $35.97 $37.77 $39.66 $41.64 Hourly

0088 Business License Inspector CMC 850 $4,850 $5,093 $5,348 $5,615 $5,896 $6,191 $6,501 Monthly $58,200 $61,116 $64,176 $67,380 $70,752 $74,292 $78,012 Annual $27.98 $29.38 $30.85 $32.39 $34.02 $35.72 $37.51 Hourly

0051 Buyer CMC 857 $5,539 $5,816 $6,107 $6,412 $6,733 $7,070 $7,424 Monthly $66,468 $69,792 $73,284 $76,944 $80,796 $84,840 $89,088 Annual $31.96 $33.55 $35.23 $36.99 $38.84 $40.79 $42.83 Hourly

0035 Central Services Supervisor CMC 655 $6,086 $6,390 $6,710 $7,046 $7,398 $7,768 $8,156 Monthly $73,032 $76,680 $80,520 $84,552 $88,776 $93,216 $97,872 Annual $35.11 $36.87 $38.71 $40.65 $42.68 $44.82 $47.05 Hourly

2004
Attachment 2

0123 Chief Construction Inspector CMC 662 $6,415 $6,736 $7,073 $7,427 $7,798 $8,188 $8,597 Monthly $76,980 $80,832 $84,876 $89,124 $93,576 $98,256 $103,164 Annual $37.01 $38.86 $40.81 $42.85 $44.99 $47.24 $49.60 Hourly

0110 Chief Plans Examiner CMC 718 $9,732 $10,219 $10,730 $11,267 $11,830 $12,421 $13,042 Monthly $116,784 $122,628 $128,760 $135,204 $141,960 $149,052 $156,504 Annual $56.15 $58.96 $61.90 $65.00 $68.25 $71.66 $75.24 Hourly

0126 Chief of Code Enforcement CMC 664 $6,477 $6,801 $7,141 $7,498 $7,873 $8,267 $8,680 Monthly $77,724 $81,612 $85,692 $89,976 $94,476 $99,204 $104,160 Annual $37.37 $39.24 $41.20 $43.26 $45.42 $47.69 $50.08 Hourly

0128 Chief of Inspection CMC 681 $8,190 $8,600 $9,030 $9,482 $9,956 $10,454 $10,977 Monthly $98,280 $103,200 $108,360 $113,784 $119,472 $125,448 $131,724 Annual $47.25 $49.62 $52.10 $54.70 $57.44 $60.31 $63.33 Hourly

0466 Civilian Investigator CMC 628 $5,697 $5,982 $6,281 $6,595 $6,925 $7,271 $7,635 Monthly $68,364 $71,784 $75,372 $79,140 $83,100 $87,252 $91,620 Annual $32.87 $34.51 $36.24 $38.05 $39.95 $41.95 $44.05 Hourly

0120 Code Enforcement Officer CMC 626 $5,361 $5,629 $5,910 $6,206 $6,516 $6,842 $7,184 Monthly $64,332 $67,548 $70,920 $74,472 $78,192 $82,104 $86,208 Annual $30.93 $32.48 $34.10 $35.80 $37.59 $39.47 $41.45 Hourly

0430 Communications Installer CMC 858 $5,241 $5,503 $5,778 $6,067 $6,370 $6,688 $7,022 Monthly $62,892 $66,036 $69,336 $72,804 $76,440 $80,256 $84,264 Annual $30.24 $31.75 $33.33 $35.00 $36.75 $38.58 $40.51 Hourly

0231 Communications Officer CMC 616 $5,692 $5,977 $6,276 $6,590 $6,920 $7,266 $7,629 Monthly $68,304 $71,724 $75,312 $79,080 $83,040 $87,192 $91,548 Annual $32.84 $34.48 $36.21 $38.02 $39.92 $41.92 $44.01 Hourly

0232 Communications Supervisor CMC 645 $6,577 $6,906 $7,251 $7,614 $7,995 $8,395 $8,815 Monthly $78,924 $82,872 $87,012 $91,368 $95,940 $100,740 $105,780 Annual $37.94 $39.84 $41.83 $43.93 $46.13 $48.43 $50.86 Hourly

0611 Community Outreach CMC 900 $6,644 $6,976 $7,325 $7,691 $8,076 $8,480 $8,904 Monthly Supervisor $79,728 $83,712 $87,900 $92,292 $96,912 $101,760 $106,848 Annual $38.33 $40.25 $42.26 $44.37 $46.59 $48.92 $51.37 Hourly

2005
Attachment 2

0610 Community Outreach CMC 893 $5,076 $5,330 $5,596 $5,876 $6,170 $6,479 $6,803 Monthly Worker $60,912 $63,960 $67,152 $70,512 $74,040 $77,748 $81,636 Annual $29.28 $30.75 $32.28 $33.90 $35.60 $37.38 $39.25 Hourly

0703 Community Services CMC 582 $4,616 $4,847 $5,089 $5,343 $5,610 $5,890 $6,185 Monthly Specialist $55,392 $58,164 $61,068 $64,116 $67,320 $70,680 $74,220 Annual $26.63 $27.96 $29.36 $30.83 $32.37 $33.98 $35.68 Hourly

0121 Construction Inspector CMC 867 $5,835 $6,127 $6,433 $6,755 $7,093 $7,448 $7,820 Monthly $70,020 $73,524 $77,196 $81,060 $85,116 $89,376 $93,840 Annual $33.66 $35.35 $37.11 $38.97 $40.92 $42.97 $45.12 Hourly

0100 Contract Administrator CMC 691 $7,546 $7,923 $8,319 $8,735 $9,172 $9,631 $10,113 Monthly $90,552 $95,076 $99,828 $104,820 $110,064 $115,572 $121,356 Annual $43.53 $45.71 $47.99 $50.39 $52.92 $55.56 $58.34 Hourly

0706 Court Liaison Officer CMC 854 $5,495 $5,770 $6,059 $6,362 $6,680 $7,014 $7,365 Monthly $65,940 $69,240 $72,708 $76,344 $80,160 $84,168 $88,380 Annual $31.70 $33.29 $34.96 $36.70 $38.54 $40.47 $42.49 Hourly

0099 Crime Analyst CMC 859 $5,697 $5,982 $6,281 $6,595 $6,925 $7,271 $7,635 Monthly $68,364 $71,784 $75,372 $79,140 $83,100 $87,252 $91,620 Annual $32.87 $34.51 $36.24 $38.05 $39.95 $41.95 $44.05 Hourly

0467 Crime Prevention Specialist CMC 852 $5,389 $5,658 $5,941 $6,238 $6,550 $6,877 $7,221 Monthly $64,668 $67,896 $71,292 $74,856 $78,600 $82,524 $86,652 Annual $31.09 $32.64 $34.28 $35.99 $37.79 $39.68 $41.66 Hourly

0189 Crime Scene Investigation CMC 50 $8,247 $8,659 $9,092 $9,547 $10,024 $10,525 $11,051 Monthly Supervisor $98,964 $103,908 $109,104 $114,564 $120,288 $126,300 $132,612 Annual $47.58 $49.96 $52.45 $55.08 $57.83 $60.72 $63.76 Hourly

0465 Crime Scene Specialist CMC 638 $5,586 $5,865 $6,158 $6,466 $6,789 $7,128 $7,484 Monthly $67,032 $70,380 $73,896 $77,592 $81,468 $85,536 $89,808 Annual $32.23 $33.84 $35.53 $37.30 $39.17 $41.12 $43.18 Hourly

0705 Custody Officer CMC 854 $5,495 $5,770 $6,059 $6,362 $6,680 $7,014 $7,365 Monthly $65,940 $69,240 $72,708 $76,344 $80,160 $84,168 $88,380 Annual $31.70 $33.29 $34.96 $36.70 $38.54 $40.47 $42.49 Hourly

2006
Attachment 2

0190 Custody Supervisor CMC 612 $8,247 $8,659 $9,092 $9,547 $10,024 $10,525 $11,051 Monthly $98,964 $103,908 $109,104 $114,564 $120,288 $126,300 $132,612 Annual $47.58 $49.96 $52.45 $55.08 $57.83 $60.72 $63.76 Hourly

0149 Economic Development CMC 898 $9,642 $10,124 $10,630 $11,162 $11,720 $12,306 $12,921 Monthly Administrator $115,704 $121,488 $127,560 $133,944 $140,640 $147,672 $155,052 Annual $55.63 $58.41 $61.33 $64.40 $67.62 $71.00 $74.54 Hourly

0134 Electrical Inspector CMC 868 $5,835 $6,127 $6,433 $6,755 $7,093 $7,448 $7,820 Monthly $70,020 $73,524 $77,196 $81,060 $85,116 $89,376 $93,840 Annual $33.66 $35.35 $37.11 $38.97 $40.92 $42.97 $45.12 Hourly

0431 Electronics Technician CMC 875 $6,524 $6,850 $7,192 $7,552 $7,930 $8,326 $8,742 Monthly $78,288 $82,200 $86,304 $90,624 $95,160 $99,912 $104,904 Annual $37.64 $39.52 $41.49 $43.57 $45.75 $48.03 $50.43 Hourly

0221 Emergency Medical CMC 706 $8,086 $8,490 $8,915 $9,361 $9,829 $10,320 $10,836 Monthly Services Coordinator $97,032 $101,880 $106,980 $112,332 $117,948 $123,840 $130,032 Annual $46.65 $48.98 $51.43 $54.01 $56.71 $59.54 $62.52 Hourly

0096 Emergency Services CMC 53 $8,866 $9,309 $9,774 $10,263 $10,776 $11,315 $11,881 Monthly Administrator $106,392 $111,708 $117,288 $123,156 $129,312 $135,780 $142,572 Annual $51.15 $53.71 $56.39 $59.21 $62.17 $65.28 $68.54 Hourly

0234 Emergency Services CMC 860 $5,481 $5,755 $6,043 $6,345 $6,662 $6,995 $7,345 Monthly Training Specialist $65,772 $69,060 $72,516 $76,140 $79,944 $83,940 $88,140 Annual $31.62 $33.20 $34.86 $36.61 $38.43 $40.36 $42.38 Hourly

0101 Engineering Technician I CMC 591 $4,827 $5,068 $5,321 $5,587 $5,866 $6,159 $6,467 Monthly $57,924 $60,816 $63,852 $67,044 $70,392 $73,908 $77,604 Annual $27.85 $29.24 $30.70 $32.23 $33.84 $35.53 $37.31 Hourly

0102 Engineering Technician II CMC 853 $5,386 $5,655 $5,938 $6,235 $6,547 $6,874 $7,218 Monthly $64,632 $67,860 $71,256 $74,820 $78,564 $82,488 $86,616 Annual $31.07 $32.63 $34.26 $35.97 $37.77 $39.66 $41.64 Hourly

0116 Engineering Technician III CMC 632 $5,921 $6,217 $6,528 $6,854 $7,197 $7,557 $7,935 Monthly $71,052 $74,604 $78,336 $82,248 $86,364 $90,684 $95,220 Annual $34.16 $35.87 $37.66 $39.54 $41.52 $43.60 $45.78 Hourly

2007
Attachment 2

0440 Equipment Mechanic I CMC 570 $4,066 $4,269 $4,482 $4,706 $4,941 $5,188 $5,447 Monthly $48,792 $51,228 $53,784 $56,472 $59,292 $62,256 $65,364 Annual $23.46 $24.63 $25.86 $27.15 $28.51 $29.93 $31.43 Hourly

0441 Equipment Mechanic II CMC 851 $4,864 $5,107 $5,362 $5,630 $5,912 $6,208 $6,518 Monthly $58,368 $61,284 $64,344 $67,560 $70,944 $74,496 $78,216 Annual $28.06 $29.46 $30.93 $32.48 $34.11 $35.82 $37.60 Hourly

0445 Equipment Mechanic III CMC 856 $5,241 $5,503 $5,778 $6,067 $6,370 $6,689 $7,023 Monthly $62,892 $66,036 $69,336 $72,804 $76,440 $80,268 $84,276 Annual $30.24 $31.75 $33.33 $35.00 $36.75 $38.59 $40.52 Hourly

0014 Executive Assistant CMC 609 $5,421 $5,692 $5,977 $6,276 $6,590 $6,920 $7,266 Monthly $65,052 $68,304 $71,724 $75,312 $79,080 $83,040 $87,192 Annual $31.28 $32.84 $34.48 $36.21 $38.02 $39.92 $41.92 Hourly

0407 Facilities Maintenance CMC 589 $4,726 $4,962 $5,210 $5,470 $5,743 $6,030 $6,332 Monthly Technician $56,712 $59,544 $62,520 $65,640 $68,916 $72,360 $75,984 Annual $27.27 $28.63 $30.06 $31.56 $33.13 $34.79 $36.53 Hourly

0304 Fairview Park Administrator CMC 887 $8,120 $8,526 $8,952 $9,400 $9,870 $10,364 $10,882 Monthly $97,440 $102,312 $107,424 $112,800 $118,440 $124,368 $130,584 Annual $46.85 $49.19 $51.65 $54.23 $56.94 $59.79 $62.78 Hourly

0057 Financial Analyst CMC 899 $7,193 $7,553 $7,931 $8,328 $8,744 $9,181 $9,640 Monthly $86,316 $90,636 $95,172 $99,936 $104,928 $110,172 $115,680 Annual $41.50 $43.58 $45.76 $48.05 $50.45 $52.97 $55.62 Hourly

0218 Fire Protection Analyst CMC 876 $6,825 $7,166 $7,524 $7,900 $8,295 $8,710 $9,146 Monthly $81,900 $85,992 $90,288 $94,800 $99,540 $104,520 $109,752 Annual $39.38 $41.34 $43.41 $45.58 $47.86 $50.25 $52.77 Hourly

0215 Fire Protection Specialist CMC 861 $6,448 $6,770 $7,109 $7,464 $7,837 $8,229 $8,640 Monthly $77,376 $81,240 $85,308 $89,568 $94,044 $98,748 $103,680 Annual $37.20 $39.06 $41.01 $43.06 $45.21 $47.48 $49.85 Hourly

0065 Grant Administrator CMC 877 $7,089 $7,443 $7,815 $8,206 $8,616 $9,047 $9,499 Monthly $85,068 $89,316 $93,780 $98,472 $103,392 $108,564 $113,988 Annual $40.90 $42.94 $45.09 $47.34 $49.71 $52.19 $54.80 Hourly

2008
Attachment 2

0029 Graphics Designer CMC 610 $4,862 $5,105 $5,360 $5,628 $5,909 $6,204 $6,514 Monthly $58,344 $61,260 $64,320 $67,536 $70,908 $74,448 $78,168 Annual $28.05 $29.45 $30.92 $32.47 $34.09 $35.79 $37.58 Hourly

0446 Lead Equipment Mechanic CMC 869 $5,909 $6,204 $6,514 $6,840 $7,182 $7,541 $7,918 Monthly $70,908 $74,448 $78,168 $82,080 $86,184 $90,492 $95,016 Annual $34.09 $35.79 $37.58 $39.46 $41.43 $43.51 $45.68 Hourly

0409 Lead Facilities CMC 863 $5,552 $5,830 $6,122 $6,428 $6,749 $7,086 $7,440 Monthly Maintenance Technician $66,624 $69,960 $73,464 $77,136 $80,988 $85,032 $89,280 Annual $32.03 $33.63 $35.32 $37.08 $38.94 $40.88 $42.92 Hourly

0405 Lead Maintenance Worker CMC 864 $5,552 $5,830 $6,122 $6,428 $6,749 $7,086 $7,440 Monthly $66,624 $69,960 $73,464 $77,136 $80,988 $85,032 $89,280 Annual $32.03 $33.63 $35.32 $37.08 $38.94 $40.88 $42.92 Hourly

0402 Maintenance Assistant CMC 550 $3,800 $3,990 $4,190 $4,399 $4,619 $4,850 $5,092 Monthly $45,600 $47,880 $50,280 $52,788 $55,428 $58,200 $61,104 Annual $21.92 $23.02 $24.17 $25.38 $26.65 $27.98 $29.38 Hourly

0412 Maintenance CMC 881 $7,530 $7,906 $8,301 $8,716 $9,152 $9,610 $10,090 Monthly Superintendent $90,360 $94,872 $99,612 $104,592 $109,824 $115,320 $121,080 Annual $43.44 $45.61 $47.89 $50.28 $52.80 $55.44 $58.21 Hourly

0406 Maintenance Supervisor CMC 670 $6,514 $6,840 $7,182 $7,541 $7,918 $8,314 $8,730 Monthly $78,168 $82,080 $86,184 $90,492 $95,016 $99,768 $104,760 Annual $37.58 $39.46 $41.43 $43.51 $45.68 $47.97 $50.37 Hourly

0403 Maintenance Worker CMC 846 $4,200 $4,410 $4,630 $4,861 $5,104 $5,359 $5,627 Monthly $50,400 $52,920 $55,560 $58,332 $61,248 $64,308 $67,524 Annual $24.23 $25.44 $26.71 $28.04 $29.45 $30.92 $32.46 Hourly

0243 Management Aide CMC 892 $5,578 $5,857 $6,150 $6,457 $6,780 $7,119 $7,475 Monthly $66,936 $70,284 $73,800 $77,484 $81,360 $85,428 $89,700 Annual $32.18 $33.79 $35.48 $37.25 $39.12 $41.07 $43.13 Hourly

0074 Management Analyst CMC 872 $6,413 $6,734 $7,071 $7,425 $7,796 $8,186 $8,595 Monthly $76,956 $80,808 $84,852 $89,100 $93,552 $98,232 $103,140 Annual $37.00 $38.85 $40.79 $42.84 $44.98 $47.23 $49.59 Hourly

2009
Attachment 2

0001 Messenger CMC 501 $3,807 $3,997 $4,197 $4,407 $4,627 $4,858 $5,101 Monthly $45,684 $47,964 $50,364 $52,884 $55,524 $58,296 $61,212 Annual $21.96 $23.06 $24.21 $25.43 $26.69 $28.03 $29.43 Hourly

0041 Network Systems CMC 631 $7,910 $8,305 $8,720 $9,156 $9,614 $10,095 $10,600 Monthly Administrator $94,920 $99,660 $104,640 $109,872 $115,368 $121,140 $127,200 Annual $45.63 $47.91 $50.31 $52.82 $55.47 $58.24 $61.15 Hourly

0006 Office Coordinator CMC 848 $4,581 $4,810 $5,050 $5,303 $5,568 $5,846 $6,138 Monthly $54,972 $57,720 $60,600 $63,636 $66,816 $70,152 $73,656 Annual $26.43 $27.75 $29.13 $30.59 $32.12 $33.73 $35.41 Hourly

0003 Office Specialist CMC 525 $3,324 $3,490 $3,664 $3,847 $4,039 $4,241 $4,453 Monthly $39,888 $41,880 $43,968 $46,164 $48,468 $50,892 $53,436 Annual $19.18 $20.13 $21.14 $22.19 $23.30 $24.47 $25.69 Hourly

0004 Office Specialist I CMC 545 $3,673 $3,857 $4,050 $4,252 $4,465 $4,688 $4,922 Monthly $44,076 $46,284 $48,600 $51,024 $53,580 $56,256 $59,064 Annual $21.19 $22.25 $23.37 $24.53 $25.76 $27.05 $28.40 Hourly

0005 Office Specialist II CMC 845 $3,958 $4,156 $4,364 $4,582 $4,811 $5,052 $5,305 Monthly $47,496 $49,872 $52,368 $54,984 $57,732 $60,624 $63,660 Annual $22.83 $23.98 $25.18 $26.43 $27.76 $29.15 $30.61 Hourly

0031 Offset Press Operator I CMC 847 $4,249 $4,461 $4,684 $4,918 $5,164 $5,422 $5,693 Monthly $50,988 $53,532 $56,208 $59,016 $61,968 $65,064 $68,316 Annual $24.51 $25.74 $27.02 $28.37 $29.79 $31.28 $32.84 Hourly

0034 Offset Press Operator II CMC 595 $4,508 $4,733 $4,970 $5,219 $5,480 $5,754 $6,042 Monthly $54,096 $56,796 $59,640 $62,628 $65,760 $69,048 $72,504 Annual $26.01 $27.31 $28.67 $30.11 $31.62 $33.20 $34.86 Hourly

0521 Park Ranger CMC 725 $5,076 $5,330 $5,596 $5,876 $6,170 $6,479 $6,803 Monthly $60,912 $63,960 $67,152 $70,512 $74,040 $77,748 $81,636 Annual $29.28 $30.75 $32.28 $33.90 $35.60 $37.38 $39.25 Hourly

0028 Permit Processing CMC 569 $4,141 $4,348 $4,565 $4,793 $5,033 $5,285 $5,549 Monthly Specialist $49,692 $52,176 $54,780 $57,516 $60,396 $63,420 $66,588 Annual $23.89 $25.08 $26.34 $27.65 $29.04 $30.49 $32.01 Hourly

2010
Attachment 2

0039 Personal Computer/ CMC 849 $4,508 $4,733 $4,970 $5,219 $5,480 $5,754 $6,042 Monthly Network Assistant $54,096 $56,796 $59,640 $62,628 $65,760 $69,048 $72,504 Annual $26.01 $27.31 $28.67 $30.11 $31.62 $33.20 $34.86 Hourly

0109 Plan Check Engineer CMC 883 $8,928 $9,374 $9,843 $10,335 $10,852 $11,395 $11,965 Monthly $107,136 $112,488 $118,116 $124,020 $130,224 $136,740 $143,580 Annual $51.51 $54.08 $56.79 $59.63 $62.61 $65.74 $69.03 Hourly

0114 Plan Checker CMC 886 $7,764 $8,152 $8,560 $8,988 $9,437 $9,909 $10,404 Monthly $93,168 $97,824 $102,720 $107,856 $113,244 $118,908 $124,848 Annual $44.79 $47.03 $49.38 $51.85 $54.44 $57.17 $60.02 Hourly

0095 Police Records CMC 52 $8,866 $9,309 $9,774 $10,263 $10,776 $11,315 $11,881 Monthly Administrator $106,392 $111,708 $117,288 $123,156 $129,312 $135,780 $142,572 Annual $51.15 $53.71 $56.39 $59.21 $62.17 $65.28 $68.54 Hourly

0461 Police Records Bureau CMC 842 $8,247 $8,659 $9,092 $9,547 $10,024 $10,525 $11,051 Monthly Supervisor $98,964 $103,908 $109,104 $114,564 $120,288 $126,300 $132,612 Annual $47.58 $49.96 $52.45 $55.08 $57.83 $60.72 $63.76 Hourly

0012 Police Records Shift CMC 594 $4,896 $5,141 $5,398 $5,668 $5,951 $6,249 $6,561 Monthly Supervisor $58,752 $61,692 $64,776 $68,016 $71,412 $74,988 $78,732 Annual $28.25 $29.66 $31.14 $32.70 $34.33 $36.05 $37.85 Hourly

0010 Police Records Technician CMC 546 $3,855 $4,048 $4,250 $4,462 $4,685 $4,919 $5,165 Monthly $46,260 $48,576 $51,000 $53,544 $56,220 $59,028 $61,980 Annual $22.24 $23.35 $24.52 $25.74 $27.03 $28.38 $29.80 Hourly

0460 Police Training CMC 844 $8,866 $9,309 $9,774 $10,263 $10,776 $11,315 $11,881 Monthly Administrator $106,392 $111,708 $117,288 $123,156 $129,312 $135,780 $142,572 Annual $51.15 $53.71 $56.39 $59.21 $62.17 $65.28 $68.54 Hourly

0459 Police Training Assistant CMC 862 $5,893 $6,188 $6,497 $6,822 $7,163 $7,521 $7,897 Monthly $70,716 $74,256 $77,964 $81,864 $85,956 $90,252 $94,764 Annual $34.00 $35.70 $37.48 $39.36 $41.33 $43.39 $45.56 Hourly

0106 Principal Civil Engineer CMC 726 $10,884 $11,428 $11,999 $12,599 $13,229 $13,890 $14,585 Monthly $130,608 $137,136 $143,988 $151,188 $158,748 $166,680 $175,020 Annual $62.79 $65.93 $69.23 $72.69 $76.32 $80.13 $84.14 Hourly

2011
Attachment 2

0154 Principal Planner CMC 704 $9,642 $10,124 $10,630 $11,162 $11,720 $12,306 $12,921 Monthly $115,704 $121,488 $127,560 $133,944 $140,640 $147,672 $155,052 Annual $55.63 $58.41 $61.33 $64.40 $67.62 $71.00 $74.54 Hourly

0043 Programmer Analyst I CMC 870 $7,003 $7,353 $7,721 $8,107 $8,512 $8,938 $9,385 Monthly $84,036 $88,236 $92,652 $97,284 $102,144 $107,256 $112,620 Annual $40.40 $42.42 $44.54 $46.77 $49.11 $51.57 $54.14 Hourly

0044 Programmer Analyst II CMC 692 $8,406 $8,826 $9,267 $9,730 $10,216 $10,727 $11,263 Monthly $100,872 $105,912 $111,204 $116,760 $122,592 $128,724 $135,156 Annual $48.50 $50.92 $53.46 $56.13 $58.94 $61.89 $64.98 Hourly

0463 Property/Evidence CMC 623 $5,182 $5,441 $5,713 $5,999 $6,299 $6,614 $6,945 Monthly Specialist $62,184 $65,292 $68,556 $71,988 $75,588 $79,368 $83,340 Annual $29.90 $31.39 $32.96 $34.61 $36.34 $38.16 $40.07 Hourly

0462 Property/Evidence CMC 843 $8,247 $8,659 $9,092 $9,547 $10,024 $10,525 $11,051 Monthly Supervisor $98,964 $103,908 $109,104 $114,564 $120,288 $126,300 $132,612 Annual $47.58 $49.96 $52.45 $55.08 $57.83 $60.72 $63.76 Hourly

0124 Public Right of Way CMC 731 $5,361 $5,629 $5,910 $6,206 $6,516 $6,842 $7,184 Monthly Coordinator $64,332 $67,548 $70,920 $74,472 $78,192 $82,104 $86,208 Annual $30.93 $32.48 $34.10 $35.80 $37.59 $39.47 $41.45 Hourly

0053 Purchasing Supervisor CMC 879 $7,753 $8,141 $8,548 $8,975 $9,424 $9,895 $10,390 Monthly $93,036 $97,692 $102,576 $107,700 $113,088 $118,740 $124,680 Annual $44.73 $46.97 $49.32 $51.78 $54.37 $57.09 $59.94 Hourly

0468 Range Master CMC 855 $5,495 $5,770 $6,059 $6,362 $6,680 $7,014 $7,365 Monthly $65,940 $69,240 $72,708 $76,344 $80,160 $84,168 $88,380 Annual $31.70 $33.29 $34.96 $36.70 $38.54 $40.47 $42.49 Hourly

0290 Recreation Coordinator CMC 583 $4,390 $4,610 $4,840 $5,082 $5,336 $5,603 $5,883 Monthly $52,680 $55,320 $58,080 $60,984 $64,032 $67,236 $70,596 Annual $25.33 $26.60 $27.92 $29.32 $30.78 $32.33 $33.94 Hourly

0508 Recreation Specialist CMC 890 $3,370 $3,538 $3,715 $3,901 $4,096 $4,301 $4,516 Monthly $40,440 $42,456 $44,580 $46,812 $49,152 $51,612 $54,192 Annual $19.44 $20.41 $21.43 $22.51 $23.63 $24.81 $26.05 Hourly

2012
Attachment 2

0302 Recreation Supervisor CMC 666 $6,644 $6,976 $7,325 $7,691 $8,076 $8,480 $8,904 Monthly $79,728 $83,712 $87,900 $92,292 $96,912 $101,760 $106,848 Annual $38.33 $40.25 $42.26 $44.37 $46.59 $48.92 $51.37 Hourly

0058 Revenue Supervisor CMC 880 $7,753 $8,141 $8,548 $8,975 $9,424 $9,895 $10,390 Monthly $93,036 $97,692 $102,576 $107,700 $113,088 $118,740 $124,680 Annual $44.73 $46.97 $49.32 $51.78 $54.37 $57.09 $59.94 Hourly

0067 Senior Accountant CMC 663 $7,305 $7,670 $8,053 $8,456 $8,879 $9,323 $9,789 Monthly $87,660 $92,040 $96,636 $101,472 $106,548 $111,876 $117,468 Annual $42.14 $44.25 $46.46 $48.78 $51.23 $53.79 $56.48 Hourly

0119 Senior Code Enforcement CMC 896 $5,761 $6,049 $6,351 $6,669 $7,002 $7,352 $7,720 Monthly Officer $69,132 $72,588 $76,212 $80,028 $84,024 $88,224 $92,640 Annual $33.24 $34.90 $36.64 $38.48 $40.40 $42.42 $44.54 Hourly

0139 Senior Combination CMC 874 $7,447 $7,819 $8,210 $8,621 $9,052 $9,505 $9,980 Monthly Inspector $89,364 $93,828 $98,520 $103,452 $108,624 $114,060 $119,760 Annual $42.96 $45.11 $47.37 $49.74 $52.22 $54.84 $57.58 Hourly

0238 Senior Communications CMC 630 $6,120 $6,426 $6,747 $7,084 $7,438 $7,810 $8,200 Monthly Officer $73,440 $77,112 $80,964 $85,008 $89,256 $93,720 $98,400 Annual $35.31 $37.07 $38.93 $40.87 $42.91 $45.06 $47.31 Hourly

0233 Senior Communications CMC 667 $8,247 $8,659 $9,092 $9,547 $10,024 $10,525 $11,051 Monthly Supervisor $98,964 $103,908 $109,104 $114,564 $120,288 $126,300 $132,612 Annual $47.58 $49.96 $52.45 $55.08 $57.83 $60.72 $63.76 Hourly

0136 Senior Electrical Inspector CMC 873 $6,449 $6,771 $7,110 $7,465 $7,838 $8,230 $8,642 Monthly $77,388 $81,252 $85,320 $89,580 $94,056 $98,760 $103,704 Annual $37.21 $39.06 $41.02 $43.07 $45.22 $47.48 $49.86 Hourly

0105 Senior Engineer CMC 884 $9,464 $9,937 $10,434 $10,956 $11,504 $12,079 $12,683 Monthly $113,568 $119,244 $125,208 $131,472 $138,048 $144,948 $152,196 Annual $54.60 $57.33 $60.20 $63.21 $66.37 $69.69 $73.17 Hourly

0432 Senior Lead Maintenance CMC 871 $6,048 $6,350 $6,667 $7,000 $7,350 $7,717 $8,103 Monthly Worker $72,576 $76,200 $80,004 $84,000 $88,200 $92,604 $97,236 Annual $34.89 $36.63 $38.46 $40.38 $42.40 $44.52 $46.75 Hourly

2013
Attachment 2

0433 Senior Maintenance CMC 597 $4,804 $5,044 $5,296 $5,561 $5,839 $6,131 $6,438 Monthly Technician $57,648 $60,528 $63,552 $66,732 $70,068 $73,572 $77,256 Annual $27.72 $29.10 $30.55 $32.08 $33.69 $35.37 $37.14 Hourly

0404 Senior Maintenance Worker CMC 587 $4,570 $4,798 $5,038 $5,290 $5,554 $5,832 $6,124 Monthly $54,840 $57,576 $60,456 $63,480 $66,648 $69,984 $73,488 Annual $26.37 $27.68 $29.07 $30.52 $32.04 $33.65 $35.33 Hourly

0244 Senior Management Analyst CMC 895 $6,733 $7,070 $7,424 $7,795 $8,185 $8,594 $9,024 Monthly $80,796 $84,840 $89,088 $93,540 $98,220 $103,128 $108,288 Annual $38.84 $40.79 $42.83 $44.97 $47.22 $49.58 $52.06 Hourly

0153 Senior Planner CMC 878 $8,385 $8,804 $9,244 $9,706 $10,191 $10,701 $11,236 Monthly $100,620 $105,648 $110,928 $116,472 $122,292 $128,412 $134,832 Annual $48.38 $50.79 $53.33 $56.00 $58.79 $61.74 $64.82 Hourly

0011 Senior Police Records CMC 561 $4,152 $4,360 $4,578 $4,807 $5,047 $5,299 $5,564 Monthly Technician $49,824 $52,320 $54,936 $57,684 $60,564 $63,588 $66,768 Annual $23.95 $25.15 $26.41 $27.73 $29.12 $30.57 $32.10 Hourly

0048 Senior Programmer Analyst CMC 710 $9,204 $9,664 $10,147 $10,654 $11,187 $11,746 $12,333 Monthly $110,448 $115,968 $121,764 $127,848 $134,244 $140,952 $147,996 Annual $53.10 $55.75 $58.54 $61.47 $64.54 $67.77 $71.15 Hourly

0050 Storekeeper CMC 588 $4,560 $4,788 $5,027 $5,278 $5,542 $5,819 $6,110 Monthly $54,720 $57,456 $60,324 $63,336 $66,504 $69,828 $73,320 Annual $26.31 $27.62 $29.00 $30.45 $31.97 $33.57 $35.25 Hourly

0089 Tax Auditing Specialist CMC 865 $5,890 $6,185 $6,494 $6,819 $7,160 $7,518 $7,894 Monthly $70,680 $74,220 $77,928 $81,828 $85,920 $90,216 $94,728 Annual $33.98 $35.68 $37.47 $39.34 $41.31 $43.37 $45.54 Hourly

0064 Treasury Specialist CMC 639 $5,890 $6,185 $6,494 $6,819 $7,160 $7,518 $7,894 Monthly $70,680 $74,220 $77,928 $81,828 $85,920 $90,216 $94,728 Annual $33.98 $35.68 $37.47 $39.34 $41.31 $43.37 $45.54 Hourly

0240 Video Production CMC 657 $6,886 $7,230 $7,591 $7,971 $8,370 $8,788 $9,227 Monthly Coordinator $82,632 $86,760 $91,092 $95,652 $100,440 $105,456 $110,724 Annual $39.73 $41.71 $43.79 $45.99 $48.29 $50.70 $53.23 Hourly

2014
Attachment 2

0241 Video Production Specialist CMC 885 $4,981 $5,230 $5,491 $5,766 $6,054 $6,357 $6,675 Monthly $59,772 $62,760 $65,892 $69,192 $72,648 $76,284 $80,100 Annual $28.74 $30.17 $31.68 $33.27 $34.93 $36.68 $38.51 Hourly

0038 Website Coordinator CMC 849 $4,508 $4,733 $4,970 $5,219 $5,480 $5,754 $6,042 Monthly $54,096 $56,796 $59,640 $62,628 $65,760 $69,048 $72,504 Annual $26.01 $27.31 $28.67 $30.11 $31.62 $33.20 $34.86 Hourly

0156 Zoning Administrator CMC 727 $8,840 $9,282 $9,746 $10,233 $10,745 $11,282 $11,846 Monthly $106,080 $111,384 $116,952 $122,796 $128,940 $135,384 $142,152 Annual $51.00 $53.55 $56.23 $59.04 $61.99 $65.09 $68.34 Hourly

SECTION 2. The City of Costa Mesa has contracted with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) to provide retirement benefits to eligible City employees. Employees will contribute towards the employee and employer contribution as stipulated in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Costa Mesa City Employees Association. There will be no Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC).

SECTION 3. All parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________ _ _____________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2022- XX and was duly 2015
Attachment 2

passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of November, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affix ed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 16
th day of November, 2022.

__________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

(SEAL)

2016
Attachment 3

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,

CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE PAY RANGES FOR JOB CLASSIFICATIONS

REPRESENTED BY THE COST A MESA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION PURSUANT TO THE 2022 - 2025 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022 , the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-XX, revising the pay ranges for job classifications represented by the Costa Mesa City Employees Association, effective the pay period that includes pay date of January 6, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City Council d esires to repeal and replace Resolution No. 2022- XX to revise the pay ranges for the classifications specified herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

Class Class Title Salary Grade Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Code Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0062 Accountant CMC 644 $6,840 $7,182 $7,541 $7,918 $8,314 $8,730 $9,167 Monthly $82,080 $86,184 $90,492 $95,016 $99,768 $104,760 $110,004 Annual $39.46 $41.43 $43.51 $45.68 $47.97 $50.37 $52.89 Hourly

0061 Accounting Specialist I CMC 577 $4,323 $4,539 $4,766 $5,004 $5,254 $5,517 $5,793 Monthly $51,876 $54,468 $57,192 $60,048 $63,048 $66,204 $69,516 Annual $24.94 $26.19 $27.50 $28.87 $30.31 $31.83 $33.42 Hourly

0060 Accounting Specialist II CMC 606 $4,995 $5,245 $5,507 $5,782 $6,071 $6,375 $6,694 Monthly $59,940 $62,940 $66,084 $69,384 $72,852 $76,500 $80,328 Annual $28.82 $30.26 $31.77 $33.36 $35.03 $36.78 $38.62 Hourly

2017
Attachment 3

0066 Accounting Supervisor CMC 697 $7,987 $8,386 $8,805 $9,245 $9,707 $10,192 $10,702 Monthly $95,844 $100,632 $105,660 $110,940 $116,484 $122,304 $128,424 Annual $46.08 $48.38 $50.80 $53.34 $56.00 $58.80 $61.74 Hourly

0107 Active Transportation CMC 732 $9,196 $9,656 $10,139 $10,646 $11,178 $11,737 $12,324 Monthly Coordinator $110,352 $115,872 $121,668 $127,752 $134,136 $140,844 $147,888 Annual $53.05 $55.71 $58.49 $61.42 $64.49 $67.71 $71.10 Hourly

0013 Administrative Assistant CMC 590 $5,076 $5,330 $5,597 $5,877 $6,171 $6,480 $6,804 Monthly $60,912 $63,960 $67,164 $70,524 $74,052 $77,760 $81,648 Annual $29.28 $30.75 $32.29 $33.91 $35.60 $37.38 $39.25 Hourly

0469 Animal Control Officer CMC 617 $5,661 $5,944 $6,241 $6,553 $6,881 $7,225 $7,586 Monthly $67,932 $71,328 $74,892 $78,636 $82,572 $86,700 $91,032 Annual $32.66 $34.29 $36.01 $37.81 $39.70 $41.68 $43.77 Hourly

0307 Arts Specialist CMC 733 $5,578 $5,857 $6,150 $6,457 $6,780 $7,119 $7,475 Monthly $66,936 $70,284 $73,800 $77,484 $81,360 $85,428 $89,700 Annual $32.18 $33.79 $35.48 $37.25 $39.12 $41.07 $43.13 Hourly

0103 Assistant Engineer CMC 672 $7,070 $7,424 $7,795 $8,185 $8,594 $9,024 $9,475 Monthly $84,840 $89,088 $93,540 $98,220 $103,128 $108,288 $113,700 Annual $40.79 $42.83 $44.97 $47.22 $49.58 $52.06 $54.66 Hourly

0217 Assistant Fire Marshal CMC 897 $7,030 $7,381 $7,750 $8,137 $8,544 $8,971 $9,420 Monthly $84,360 $88,572 $93,000 $97,644 $102,528 $107,652 $113,040 Annual $40.56 $42.58 $44.71 $46.94 $49.29 $51.76 $54.35 Hourly

0151 Assistant Planner CMC 889 $6,530 $6,856 $7,199 $7,559 $7,937 $8,334 $8,751 Monthly $78,360 $82,272 $86,388 $90,708 $95,244 $100,008 $105,012 Annual $37.67 $39.55 $41.53 $43.61 $45.79 $48.08 $50.49 Hourly

0301 Assistant Recreation CMC 625 $5,578 $5,857 $6,150 $6,457 $6,780 $7,119 $7,475 Monthly Supervisor $66,936 $70,284 $73,800 $77,484 $81,360 $85,428 $89,700 Annual $32.18 $33.79 $35.48 $37.25 $39.12 $41.07 $43.13 Hourly

0808 Assistant Storekeeper CMC 571 $4,315 $4,531 $4,758 $4,996 $5,246 $5,508 $5,783 Monthly $51,780 $54,372 $57,096 $59,952 $62,952 $66,096 $69,396 Annual $24.89 $26.14 $27.45 $28.82 $30.27 $31.78 $33.36 Hourly

2018
Attachment 3

0104 Associate Engineer CMC 699 $8,862 $9,305 $9,770 $10,258 $10,771 $11,310 $11,876 Monthly $106,344 $111,660 $117,240 $123,096 $129,252 $135,720 $142,512 Annual $51.13 $53.68 $56.37 $59.18 $62.14 $65.25 $68.52 Hourly

0152 Associate Planner CMC 649 $7,510 $7,886 $8,280 $8,694 $9,129 $9,585 $10,064 Monthly $90,120 $94,632 $99,360 $104,328 $109,548 $115,020 $120,768 Annual $43.33 $45.50 $47.77 $50.16 $52.67 $55.30 $58.06 Hourly

0132 Building Inspector I CMC 643 $6,640 $6,972 $7,321 $7,687 $8,071 $8,475 $8,899 Monthly $79,680 $83,664 $87,852 $92,244 $96,852 $101,700 $106,788 Annual $38.31 $40.22 $42.24 $44.35 $46.56 $48.89 $51.34 Hourly

0138 Building Inspector II CMC 866 $6,972 $7,321 $7,687 $8,071 $8,475 $8,899 $9,344 Monthly $83,664 $87,852 $92,244 $96,852 $101,700 $106,788 $112,128 Annual $40.22 $42.24 $44.35 $46.56 $48.89 $51.34 $53.91 Hourly

0130 Building Technician I CMC 581 $4,729 $4,965 $5,213 $5,474 $5,748 $6,035 $6,337 Monthly $56,748 $59,580 $62,556 $65,688 $68,976 $72,420 $76,044 Annual $27.28 $28.64 $30.08 $31.58 $33.16 $34.82 $36.56 Hourly

0131 Building Technician II CMC 613 $5,549 $5,826 $6,117 $6,423 $6,744 $7,081 $7,435 Monthly $66,588 $69,912 $73,404 $77,076 $80,928 $84,972 $89,220 Annual $32.01 $33.61 $35.29 $37.06 $38.91 $40.85 $42.89 Hourly

0088 Business License Inspector CMC 850 $4,997 $5,247 $5,509 $5,784 $6,073 $6,377 $6,696 Monthly $59,964 $62,964 $66,108 $69,408 $72,876 $76,524 $80,352 Annual $28.83 $30.27 $31.78 $33.37 $35.04 $36.79 $38.63 Hourly

0051 Buyer CMC 857 $5,706 $5,991 $6,291 $6,606 $6,936 $7,283 $7,647 Monthly $68,472 $71,892 $75,492 $79,272 $83,232 $87,396 $91,764 Annual $32.92 $34.56 $36.29 $38.11 $40.02 $42.02 $44.12 Hourly

0035 Central Services Supervisor CMC 655 $6,269 $6,582 $6,911 $7,257 $7,620 $8,001 $8,401 Monthly $75,228 $78,984 $82,932 $87,084 $91,440 $96,012 $100,812 Annual $36.17 $37.97 $39.87 $41.87 $43.96 $46.16 $48.47 Hourly

0123 Chief Construction Inspector CMC 662 $6,608 $6,938 $7,285 $7,649 $8,031 $8,433 $8,855 Monthly $79,296 $83,256 $87,420 $91,788 $96,372 $101,196 $106,260 Annual $38.12 $40.03 $42.03 $44.13 $46.33 $48.65 $51.09 Hourly

2019
Attachment 3

0110 Chief Plans Examiner CMC 718 $10,024 $10,525 $11,051 $11,604 $12,184 $12,793 $13,433 Monthly $120,288 $126,300 $132,612 $139,248 $146,208 $153,516 $161,196 Annual $57.83 $60.72 $63.76 $66.95 $70.29 $73.81 $77.50 Hourly

0126 Chief of Code Enforcement CMC 664 $6,671 $7,005 $7,355 $7,723 $8,109 $8,514 $8,940 Monthly $80,052 $84,060 $88,260 $92,676 $97,308 $102,168 $107,280 Annual $38.49 $40.41 $42.43 $44.56 $46.78 $49.12 $51.58 Hourly

0128 Chief of Inspection CMC 681 $8,437 $8,859 $9,302 $9,767 $10,255 $10,768 $11,306 Monthly $101,244 $106,308 $111,624 $117,204 $123,060 $129,216 $135,672 Annual $48.68 $51.11 $53.67 $56.35 $59.16 $62.12 $65.23 Hourly

0466 Civilian Investigator CMC 628 $5,869 $6,162 $6,470 $6,793 $7,133 $7,490 $7,864 Monthly $70,428 $73,944 $77,640 $81,516 $85,596 $89,880 $94,368 Annual $33.86 $35.55 $37.33 $39.19 $41.15 $43.21 $45.37 Hourly

0120 Code Enforcement Officer CMC 626 $5,522 $5,798 $6,088 $6,392 $6,712 $7,048 $7,400 Monthly $66,264 $69,576 $73,056 $76,704 $80,544 $84,576 $88,800 Annual $31.86 $33.45 $35.12 $36.88 $38.72 $40.66 $42.69 Hourly

0430 Communications Installer CMC 858 $5,398 $5,668 $5,951 $6,249 $6,561 $6,889 $7,233 Monthly $64,776 $68,016 $71,412 $74,988 $78,732 $82,668 $86,796 Annual $31.14 $32.70 $34.33 $36.05 $37.85 $39.74 $41.73 Hourly

0231 Communications Officer CMC 616 $5,865 $6,158 $6,466 $6,789 $7,128 $7,484 $7,858 Monthly $70,380 $73,896 $77,592 $81,468 $85,536 $89,808 $94,296 Annual $33.84 $35.53 $37.30 $39.17 $41.12 $43.18 $45.33 Hourly

0232 Communications Supervisor CMC 645 $6,775 $7,114 $7,470 $7,843 $8,235 $8,647 $9,079 Monthly $81,300 $85,368 $89,640 $94,116 $98,820 $103,764 $108,948 Annual $39.09 $41.04 $43.10 $45.25 $47.51 $49.89 $52.38 Hourly

0611 Community Outreach CMC 900 $6,844 $7,186 $7,545 $7,922 $8,318 $8,734 $9,171 Monthly Supervisor $82,128 $86,232 $90,540 $95,064 $99,816 $104,808 $110,052 Annual $39.48 $41.46 $43.53 $45.70 $47.99 $50.39 $52.91 Hourly

0610 Community Outreach CMC 893 $5,229 $5,490 $5,764 $6,052 $6,355 $6,673 $7,007 Monthly Worker $62,748 $65,880 $69,168 $72,624 $76,260 $80,076 $84,084 Annual $30.17 $31.67 $33.25 $34.92 $36.66 $38.50 $40.43 Hourly

2020
Attachment 3

0703 Community Services CMC 582 $4,754 $4,992 $5,242 $5,504 $5,779 $6,068 $6,371 Monthly Specialist $57,048 $59,904 $62,904 $66,048 $69,348 $72,816 $76,452 Annual $27.43 $28.80 $30.24 $31.75 $33.34 $35.01 $36.76 Hourly

0121 Construction Inspector CMC 867 $6,010 $6,311 $6,627 $6,958 $7,306 $7,671 $8,055 Monthly $72,120 $75,732 $79,524 $83,496 $87,672 $92,052 $96,660 Annual $34.67 $36.41 $38.23 $40.14 $42.15 $44.26 $46.47 Hourly

0100 Contract Administrator CMC 691 $7,773 $8,162 $8,570 $8,998 $9,448 $9,920 $10,416 Monthly $93,276 $97,944 $102,840 $107,976 $113,376 $119,040 $124,992 Annual $44.84 $47.09 $49.44 $51.91 $54.51 $57.23 $60.09 Hourly

0706 Court Liaison Officer CMC 854 $5,661 $5,944 $6,241 $6,553 $6,881 $7,225 $7,586 Monthly $67,932 $71,328 $74,892 $78,636 $82,572 $86,700 $91,032 Annual $32.66 $34.29 $36.01 $37.81 $39.70 $41.68 $43.77 Hourly

0099 Crime Analyst CMC 859 $5,869 $6,162 $6,470 $6,793 $7,133 $7,490 $7,864 Monthly $70,428 $73,944 $77,640 $81,516 $85,596 $89,880 $94,368 Annual $33.86 $35.55 $37.33 $39.19 $41.15 $43.21 $45.37 Hourly

0467 Crime Prevention Specialist CMC 852 $5,551 $5,829 $6,120 $6,426 $6,747 $7,084 $7,438 Monthly $66,612 $69,948 $73,440 $77,112 $80,964 $85,008 $89,256 Annual $32.03 $33.63 $35.31 $37.07 $38.93 $40.87 $42.91 Hourly

0189 Crime Scene Investigation CMC 50 $8,494 $8,919 $9,365 $9,833 $10,325 $10,841 $11,383 Monthly Supervisor $101,928 $107,028 $112,380 $117,996 $123,900 $130,092 $136,596 Annual $49.00 $51.46 $54.03 $56.73 $59.57 $62.54 $65.67 Hourly

0465 Crime Scene Specialist CMC 638 $5,752 $6,040 $6,342 $6,659 $6,992 $7,342 $7,709 Monthly $69,024 $72,480 $76,104 $79,908 $83,904 $88,104 $92,508 Annual $33.18 $34.85 $36.59 $38.42 $40.34 $42.36 $44.48 Hourly

0705 Custody Officer CMC 854 $5,661 $5,944 $6,241 $6,553 $6,881 $7,225 $7,586 Monthly $67,932 $71,328 $74,892 $78,636 $82,572 $86,700 $91,032 Annual $32.66 $34.29 $36.01 $37.81 $39.70 $41.68 $43.77 Hourly

0190 Custody Supervisor CMC 612 $8,494 $8,919 $9,365 $9,833 $10,325 $10,841 $11,383 Monthly $101,928 $107,028 $112,380 $117,996 $123,900 $130,092 $136,596 Annual $49.00 $51.46 $54.03 $56.73 $59.57 $62.54 $65.67 Hourly

2021
Attachment 3

0149 Economic Development CMC 898 $9,931 $10,428 $10,949 $11,496 $12,071 $12,675 $13,309 Monthly Administrator $119,172 $125,136 $131,388 $137,952 $144,852 $152,100 $159,708 Annual $57.29 $60.16 $63.17 $66.32 $69.64 $73.13 $76.78 Hourly

0134 Electrical Inspector CMC 868 $6,010 $6,311 $6,627 $6,958 $7,306 $7,671 $8,055 Monthly $72,120 $75,732 $79,524 $83,496 $87,672 $92,052 $96,660 Annual $34.67 $36.41 $38.23 $40.14 $42.15 $44.26 $46.47 Hourly

0431 Electronics Technician CMC 875 $6,719 $7,055 $7,408 $7,778 $8,167 $8,575 $9,004 Monthly $80,628 $84,660 $88,896 $93,336 $98,004 $102,900 $108,048 Annual $38.76 $40.70 $42.74 $44.87 $47.12 $49.47 $51.95 Hourly

0221 Emergency Medical CMC 706 $8,330 $8,746 $9,183 $9,642 $10,124 $10,630 $11,161 Monthly Services Coordinator $99,960 $104,952 $110,196 $115,704 $121,488 $127,560 $133,932 Annual $48.06 $50.46 $52.98 $55.63 $58.41 $61.33 $64.39 Hourly

0096 Emergency Services CMC 53 $9,131 $9,588 $10,067 $10,570 $11,099 $11,654 $12,237 Monthly Administrator $109,572 $115,056 $120,804 $126,840 $133,188 $139,848 $146,844 Annual $52.68 $55.32 $58.08 $60.98 $64.03 $67.23 $70.60 Hourly

0234 Emergency Services CMC 860 $5,646 $5,928 $6,224 $6,535 $6,862 $7,205 $7,565 Monthly Training Specialist $67,752 $71,136 $74,688 $78,420 $82,344 $86,460 $90,780 Annual $32.57 $34.20 $35.91 $37.70 $39.59 $41.57 $43.64 Hourly

0101 Engineering Technician I CMC 591 $4,970 $5,219 $5,480 $5,754 $6,042 $6,344 $6,661 Monthly $59,640 $62,628 $65,760 $69,048 $72,504 $76,128 $79,932 Annual $28.67 $30.11 $31.62 $33.20 $34.86 $36.60 $38.43 Hourly

0102 Engineering Technician II CMC 853 $5,549 $5,826 $6,117 $6,423 $6,744 $7,081 $7,435 Monthly $66,588 $69,912 $73,404 $77,076 $80,928 $84,972 $89,220 Annual $32.01 $33.61 $35.29 $37.06 $38.91 $40.85 $42.89 Hourly

0116 Engineering Technician III CMC 632 $6,099 $6,404 $6,724 $7,060 $7,413 $7,784 $8,173 Monthly $73,188 $76,848 $80,688 $84,720 $88,956 $93,408 $98,076 Annual $35.19 $36.95 $38.79 $40.73 $42.77 $44.91 $47.15 Hourly

0440 Equipment Mechanic I CMC 570 $4,187 $4,396 $4,616 $4,847 $5,089 $5,343 $5,610 Monthly $50,244 $52,752 $55,392 $58,164 $61,068 $64,116 $67,320 Annual $24.16 $25.36 $26.63 $27.96 $29.36 $30.83 $32.37 Hourly

2022
Attachment 3

0441 Equipment Mechanic II CMC 851 $5,010 $5,261 $5,524 $5,800 $6,090 $6,394 $6,714 Monthly $60,120 $63,132 $66,288 $69,600 $73,080 $76,728 $80,568 Annual $28.90 $30.35 $31.87 $33.46 $35.13 $36.89 $38.73 Hourly

0445 Equipment Mechanic III CMC 856 $5,399 $5,669 $5,952 $6,250 $6,562 $6,890 $7,234 Monthly $64,788 $68,028 $71,424 $75,000 $78,744 $82,680 $86,808 Annual $31.15 $32.71 $34.34 $36.06 $37.86 $39.75 $41.73 Hourly

0014 Executive Assistant CMC 609 $5,586 $5,865 $6,158 $6,466 $6,789 $7,128 $7,484 Monthly $67,032 $70,380 $73,896 $77,592 $81,468 $85,536 $89,808 Annual $32.23 $33.84 $35.53 $37.30 $39.17 $41.12 $43.18 Hourly

0407 Facilities Maintenance CMC 589 $4,867 $5,110 $5,365 $5,633 $5,915 $6,211 $6,522 Monthly Technician $58,404 $61,320 $64,380 $67,596 $70,980 $74,532 $78,264 Annual $28.08 $29.48 $30.95 $32.50 $34.13 $35.83 $37.63 Hourly

0304 Fairview Park Administrator CMC 887 $8,364 $8,782 $9,221 $9,682 $10,166 $10,674 $11,208 Monthly $100,368 $105,384 $110,652 $116,184 $121,992 $128,088 $134,496 Annual $48.25 $50.67 $53.20 $55.86 $58.65 $61.58 $64.66 Hourly

0057 Financial Analyst CMC 899 $7,410 $7,780 $8,169 $8,577 $9,006 $9,456 $9,929 Monthly $88,920 $93,360 $98,028 $102,924 $108,072 $113,472 $119,148 Annual $42.75 $44.88 $47.13 $49.48 $51.96 $54.55 $57.28 Hourly

0218 Fire Protection Analyst CMC 876 $7,030 $7,381 $7,750 $8,137 $8,544 $8,971 $9,420 Monthly $84,360 $88,572 $93,000 $97,644 $102,528 $107,652 $113,040 Annual $40.56 $42.58 $44.71 $46.94 $49.29 $51.76 $54.35 Hourly

0215 Fire Protection Specialist CMC 861 $6,640 $6,972 $7,321 $7,687 $8,071 $8,475 $8,899 Monthly $79,680 $83,664 $87,852 $92,244 $96,852 $101,700 $106,788 Annual $38.31 $40.22 $42.24 $44.35 $46.56 $48.89 $51.34 Hourly

0065 Grant Administrator CMC 877 $7,301 $7,666 $8,049 $8,451 $8,874 $9,318 $9,784 Monthly $87,612 $91,992 $96,588 $101,412 $106,488 $111,816 $117,408 Annual $42.12 $44.23 $46.44 $48.76 $51.20 $53.76 $56.45 Hourly

0029 Graphics Designer CMC 610 $5,007 $5,257 $5,520 $5,796 $6,086 $6,390 $6,709 Monthly $60,084 $63,084 $66,240 $69,552 $73,032 $76,680 $80,508 Annual $28.89 $30.33 $31.85 $33.44 $35.11 $36.87 $38.71 Hourly

2023
Attachment 3

0446 Lead Equipment Mechanic CMC 869 $6,086 $6,390 $6,710 $7,046 $7,398 $7,768 $8,156 Monthly $73,032 $76,680 $80,520 $84,552 $88,776 $93,216 $97,872 Annual $35.11 $36.87 $38.71 $40.65 $42.68 $44.82 $47.05 Hourly

0409 Lead Facilities CMC 863 $5,718 $6,004 $6,304 $6,619 $6,950 $7,298 $7,663 Monthly Maintenance Technician $68,616 $72,048 $75,648 $79,428 $83,400 $87,576 $91,956 Annual $32.99 $34.64 $36.37 $38.19 $40.10 $42.10 $44.21 Hourly

0405 Lead Maintenance Worker CMC 864 $5,718 $6,004 $6,304 $6,619 $6,950 $7,298 $7,663 Monthly $68,616 $72,048 $75,648 $79,428 $83,400 $87,576 $91,956 Annual $32.99 $34.64 $36.37 $38.19 $40.10 $42.10 $44.21 Hourly

0402 Maintenance Assistant CMC 550 $3,913 $4,109 $4,314 $4,530 $4,757 $4,995 $5,245 Monthly $46,956 $49,308 $51,768 $54,360 $57,084 $59,940 $62,940 Annual $22.58 $23.71 $24.89 $26.13 $27.44 $28.82 $30.26 Hourly

0412 Maintenance CMC 881 $7,755 $8,143 $8,550 $8,978 $9,427 $9,898 $10,393 Monthly Superintendent $93,060 $97,716 $102,600 $107,736 $113,124 $118,776 $124,716 Annual $44.74 $46.98 $49.33 $51.80 $54.39 $57.10 $59.96 Hourly

0406 Maintenance Supervisor CMC 670 $6,710 $7,046 $7,398 $7,768 $8,156 $8,564 $8,992 Monthly $80,520 $84,552 $88,776 $93,216 $97,872 $102,768 $107,904 Annual $38.71 $40.65 $42.68 $44.82 $47.05 $49.41 $51.88 Hourly

0403 Maintenance Worker CMC 846 $4,326 $4,542 $4,769 $5,007 $5,257 $5,520 $5,796 Monthly $51,912 $54,504 $57,228 $60,084 $63,084 $66,240 $69,552 Annual $24.96 $26.20 $27.51 $28.89 $30.33 $31.85 $33.44 Hourly

0243 Management Aide CMC 892 $5,744 $6,031 $6,333 $6,650 $6,983 $7,332 $7,699 Monthly $68,928 $72,372 $75,996 $79,800 $83,796 $87,984 $92,388 Annual $33.14 $34.79 $36.54 $38.37 $40.29 $42.30 $44.42 Hourly

0074 Management Analyst CMC 872 $6,607 $6,937 $7,284 $7,648 $8,030 $8,431 $8,853 Monthly $79,284 $83,244 $87,408 $91,776 $96,360 $101,172 $106,236 Annual $38.12 $40.02 $42.02 $44.12 $46.33 $48.64 $51.08 Hourly

0001 Messenger CMC 501 $3,921 $4,117 $4,323 $4,539 $4,766 $5,004 $5,254 Monthly $47,052 $49,404 $51,876 $54,468 $57,192 $60,048 $63,048 Annual $22.62 $23.75 $24.94 $26.19 $27.50 $28.87 $30.31 Hourly

2024
Attachment 3

0041 Network Systems CMC 631 $8,147 $8,554 $8,982 $9,431 $9,903 $10,398 $10,918 Monthly Administrator $97,764 $102,648 $107,784 $113,172 $118,836 $124,776 $131,016 Annual $47.00 $49.35 $51.82 $54.41 $57.13 $59.99 $62.99 Hourly

0006 Office Coordinator CMC 848 $4,717 $4,953 $5,201 $5,461 $5,734 $6,021 $6,322 Monthly $56,604 $59,436 $62,412 $65,532 $68,808 $72,252 $75,864 Annual $27.21 $28.58 $30.01 $31.51 $33.08 $34.74 $36.47 Hourly

0003 Office Specialist CMC 525 $3,423 $3,594 $3,774 $3,963 $4,161 $4,369 $4,587 Monthly $41,076 $43,128 $45,288 $47,556 $49,932 $52,428 $55,044 Annual $19.75 $20.73 $21.77 $22.86 $24.01 $25.21 $26.46 Hourly

0004 Office Specialist I CMC 545 $3,783 $3,972 $4,171 $4,380 $4,599 $4,829 $5,070 Monthly $45,396 $47,664 $50,052 $52,560 $55,188 $57,948 $60,840 Annual $21.83 $22.92 $24.06 $25.27 $26.53 $27.86 $29.25 Hourly

0005 Office Specialist II CMC 845 $4,077 $4,281 $4,495 $4,720 $4,956 $5,204 $5,464 Monthly $48,924 $51,372 $53,940 $56,640 $59,472 $62,448 $65,568 Annual $23.52 $24.70 $25.93 $27.23 $28.59 $30.02 $31.52 Hourly

0031 Offset Press Operator I CMC 847 $4,376 $4,595 $4,825 $5,066 $5,319 $5,585 $5,864 Monthly $52,512 $55,140 $57,900 $60,792 $63,828 $67,020 $70,368 Annual $25.25 $26.51 $27.84 $29.23 $30.69 $32.22 $33.83 Hourly

0034 Offset Press Operator II CMC 595 $4,644 $4,876 $5,120 $5,376 $5,645 $5,927 $6,223 Monthly $55,728 $58,512 $61,440 $64,512 $67,740 $71,124 $74,676 Annual $26.79 $28.13 $29.54 $31.02 $32.57 $34.19 $35.90 Hourly

0521 Park Ranger CMC 725 $5,229 $5,490 $5,764 $6,052 $6,355 $6,673 $7,007 Monthly $62,748 $65,880 $69,168 $72,624 $76,260 $80,076 $84,084 Annual $30.17 $31.67 $33.25 $34.92 $36.66 $38.50 $40.43 Hourly

0028 Permit Processing CMC 569 $4,265 $4,478 $4,702 $4,937 $5,184 $5,443 $5,715 Monthly Specialist $51,180 $53,736 $56,424 $59,244 $62,208 $65,316 $68,580 Annual $24.61 $25.83 $27.13 $28.48 $29.91 $31.40 $32.97 Hourly

0039 Personal Computer/ CMC 849 $4,644 $4,876 $5,120 $5,376 $5,645 $5,927 $6,223 Monthly Network Assistant $55,728 $58,512 $61,440 $64,512 $67,740 $71,124 $74,676 Annual $26.79 $28.13 $29.54 $31.02 $32.57 $34.19 $35.90 Hourly

2025
Attachment 3

0109 Plan Check Engineer CMC 883 $9,196 $9,656 $10,139 $10,646 $11,178 $11,737 $12,324 Monthly $110,352 $115,872 $121,668 $127,752 $134,136 $140,844 $147,888 Annual $53.05 $55.71 $58.49 $61.42 $64.49 $67.71 $71.10 Hourly

0114 Plan Checker CMC 886 $7,996 $8,396 $8,816 $9,257 $9,720 $10,206 $10,716 Monthly $95,952 $100,752 $105,792 $111,084 $116,640 $122,472 $128,592 Annual $46.13 $48.44 $50.86 $53.41 $56.08 $58.88 $61.82 Hourly

0095 Police Records CMC 52 $9,131 $9,588 $10,067 $10,570 $11,099 $11,654 $12,237 Monthly Administrator $109,572 $115,056 $120,804 $126,840 $133,188 $139,848 $146,844 Annual $52.68 $55.32 $58.08 $60.98 $64.03 $67.23 $70.60 Hourly

0461 Police Records Bureau CMC 842 $8,494 $8,919 $9,365 $9,833 $10,325 $10,841 $11,383 Monthly Supervisor $101,928 $107,028 $112,380 $117,996 $123,900 $130,092 $136,596 Annual $49.00 $51.46 $54.03 $56.73 $59.57 $62.54 $65.67 Hourly

0012 Police Records Shift CMC 594 $5,043 $5,295 $5,560 $5,838 $6,130 $6,436 $6,758 Monthly Supervisor $60,516 $63,540 $66,720 $70,056 $73,560 $77,232 $81,096 Annual $29.09 $30.55 $32.08 $33.68 $35.37 $37.13 $38.99 Hourly

0010 Police Records Technician CMC 546 $3,970 $4,169 $4,377 $4,596 $4,826 $5,067 $5,320 Monthly $47,640 $50,028 $52,524 $55,152 $57,912 $60,804 $63,840 Annual $22.90 $24.05 $25.25 $26.52 $27.84 $29.23 $30.69 Hourly

0460 Police Training CMC 844 $9,131 $9,588 $10,067 $10,570 $11,099 $11,654 $12,237 Monthly Administrator $109,572 $115,056 $120,804 $126,840 $133,188 $139,848 $146,844 Annual $52.68 $55.32 $58.08 $60.98 $64.03 $67.23 $70.60 Hourly

0459 Police Training Assistant CMC 862 $6,070 $6,373 $6,692 $7,027 $7,378 $7,747 $8,134 Monthly $72,840 $76,476 $80,304 $84,324 $88,536 $92,964 $97,608 Annual $35.02 $36.77 $38.61 $40.54 $42.57 $44.69 $46.93 Hourly

0106 Principal Civil Engineer CMC 726 $11,210 $11,771 $12,360 $12,978 $13,627 $14,308 $15,023 Monthly $134,520 $141,252 $148,320 $155,736 $163,524 $171,696 $180,276 Annual $64.67 $67.91 $71.31 $74.87 $78.62 $82.55 $86.67 Hourly

0154 Principal Planner CMC 704 $9,931 $10,428 $10,949 $11,496 $12,071 $12,675 $13,309 Monthly $119,172 $125,136 $131,388 $137,952 $144,852 $152,100 $159,708 Annual $57.29 $60.16 $63.17 $66.32 $69.64 $73.13 $76.78 Hourly

2026
Attachment 3

0043 Programmer Analyst I CMC 870 $7,213 $7,574 $7,953 $8,351 $8,769 $9,207 $9,667 Monthly $86,556 $90,888 $95,436 $100,212 $105,228 $110,484 $116,004 Annual $41.61 $43.70 $45.88 $48.18 $50.59 $53.12 $55.77 Hourly

0044 Programmer Analyst II CMC 692 $8,657 $9,090 $9,545 $10,022 $10,523 $11,049 $11,601 Monthly $103,884 $109,080 $114,540 $120,264 $126,276 $132,588 $139,212 Annual $49.94 $52.44 $55.07 $57.82 $60.71 $63.74 $66.93 Hourly

0463 Property/Evidence CMC 623 $5,338 $5,605 $5,885 $6,179 $6,488 $6,812 $7,153 Monthly Specialist $64,056 $67,260 $70,620 $74,148 $77,856 $81,744 $85,836 Annual $30.80 $32.34 $33.95 $35.65 $37.43 $39.30 $41.27 Hourly

0462 Property/Evidence CMC 843 $8,494 $8,919 $9,365 $9,833 $10,325 $10,841 $11,383 Monthly Supervisor $101,928 $107,028 $112,380 $117,996 $123,900 $130,092 $136,596 Annual $49.00 $51.46 $54.03 $56.73 $59.57 $62.54 $65.67 Hourly

0124 Public Right of Way CMC 731 $5,522 $5,798 $6,088 $6,392 $6,712 $7,048 $7,400 Monthly Coordinator $66,264 $69,576 $73,056 $76,704 $80,544 $84,576 $88,800 Annual $31.86 $33.45 $35.12 $36.88 $38.72 $40.66 $42.69 Hourly

0053 Purchasing Supervisor CMC 879 $7,987 $8,386 $8,805 $9,245 $9,707 $10,192 $10,702 Monthly $95,844 $100,632 $105,660 $110,940 $116,484 $122,304 $128,424 Annual $46.08 $48.38 $50.80 $53.34 $56.00 $58.80 $61.74 Hourly

0468 Range Master CMC 855 $5,661 $5,944 $6,241 $6,553 $6,881 $7,225 $7,586 Monthly $67,932 $71,328 $74,892 $78,636 $82,572 $86,700 $91,032 Annual $32.66 $34.29 $36.01 $37.81 $39.70 $41.68 $43.77 Hourly

0290 Recreation Coordinator CMC 583 $4,521 $4,747 $4,984 $5,233 $5,495 $5,770 $6,059 Monthly $54,252 $56,964 $59,808 $62,796 $65,940 $69,240 $72,708 Annual $26.08 $27.39 $28.75 $30.19 $31.70 $33.29 $34.96 Hourly

0508 Recreation Specialist CMC 890 $3,471 $3,645 $3,827 $4,018 $4,219 $4,430 $4,651 Monthly $41,652 $43,740 $45,924 $48,216 $50,628 $53,160 $55,812 Annual $20.03 $21.03 $22.08 $23.18 $24.34 $25.56 $26.83 Hourly

0302 Recreation Supervisor CMC 666 $6,844 $7,186 $7,545 $7,922 $8,318 $8,734 $9,171 Monthly $82,128 $86,232 $90,540 $95,064 $99,816 $104,808 $110,052 Annual $39.48 $41.46 $43.53 $45.70 $47.99 $50.39 $52.91 Hourly

2027
Attachment 3

0058 Revenue Supervisor CMC 880 $7,987 $8,386 $8,805 $9,245 $9,707 $10,192 $10,702 Monthly $95,844 $100,632 $105,660 $110,940 $116,484 $122,304 $128,424 Annual $46.08 $48.38 $50.80 $53.34 $56.00 $58.80 $61.74 Hourly

0067 Senior Accountant CMC 663 $7,524 $7,900 $8,295 $8,710 $9,146 $9,603 $10,083 Monthly $90,288 $94,800 $99,540 $104,520 $109,752 $115,236 $120,996 Annual $43.41 $45.58 $47.86 $50.25 $52.77 $55.40 $58.17 Hourly

0119 Senior Code Enforcement CMC 896 $5,933 $6,230 $6,542 $6,869 $7,212 $7,573 $7,952 Monthly Officer $71,196 $74,760 $78,504 $82,428 $86,544 $90,876 $95,424 Annual $34.23 $35.94 $37.74 $39.63 $41.61 $43.69 $45.88 Hourly

0139 Senior Combination CMC 874 $7,670 $8,054 $8,457 $8,880 $9,324 $9,790 $10,279 Monthly Inspector $92,040 $96,648 $101,484 $106,560 $111,888 $117,480 $123,348 Annual $44.25 $46.47 $48.79 $51.23 $53.79 $56.48 $59.30 Hourly

0238 Senior Communications CMC 630 $6,303 $6,618 $6,949 $7,296 $7,661 $8,044 $8,446 Monthly Officer $75,636 $79,416 $83,388 $87,552 $91,932 $96,528 $101,352 Annual $36.36 $38.18 $40.09 $42.09 $44.20 $46.41 $48.73 Hourly

0233 Senior Communications CMC 667 $8,494 $8,919 $9,365 $9,833 $10,325 $10,841 $11,383 Monthly Supervisor $101,928 $107,028 $112,380 $117,996 $123,900 $130,092 $136,596 Annual $49.00 $51.46 $54.03 $56.73 $59.57 $62.54 $65.67 Hourly

0136 Senior Electrical Inspector CMC 873 $6,642 $6,974 $7,323 $7,689 $8,073 $8,477 $8,901 Monthly $79,704 $83,688 $87,876 $92,268 $96,876 $101,724 $106,812 Annual $38.32 $40.23 $42.25 $44.36 $46.58 $48.91 $51.35 Hourly

0105 Senior Engineer CMC 884 $9,749 $10,236 $10,748 $11,285 $11,849 $12,441 $13,063 Monthly $116,988 $122,832 $128,976 $135,420 $142,188 $149,292 $156,756 Annual $56.24 $59.05 $62.01 $65.11 $68.36 $71.78 $75.36 Hourly

0432 Senior Lead Maintenance CMC 871 $6,229 $6,540 $6,867 $7,210 $7,570 $7,949 $8,346 Monthly Worker $74,748 $78,480 $82,404 $86,520 $90,840 $95,388 $100,152 Annual $35.94 $37.73 $39.62 $41.60 $43.67 $45.86 $48.15 Hourly

0433 Senior Maintenance CMC 597 $4,948 $5,195 $5,455 $5,728 $6,014 $6,315 $6,631 Monthly Technician $59,376 $62,340 $65,460 $68,736 $72,168 $75,780 $79,572 Annual $28.55 $29.97 $31.47 $33.05 $34.70 $36.43 $38.26 Hourly

2028
Attachment 3

0404 Senior Maintenance Worker CMC 587 $4,708 $4,943 $5,190 $5,450 $5,722 $6,008 $6,308 Monthly $56,496 $59,316 $62,280 $65,400 $68,664 $72,096 $75,696 Annual $27.16 $28.52 $29.94 $31.44 $33.01 $34.66 $36.39 Hourly

0244 Senior Management Analyst CMC 895 $6,936 $7,283 $7,647 $8,029 $8,430 $8,852 $9,295 Monthly $83,232 $87,396 $91,764 $96,348 $101,160 $106,224 $111,540 Annual $40.02 $42.02 $44.12 $46.32 $48.63 $51.07 $53.63 Hourly

0153 Senior Planner CMC 878 $8,636 $9,068 $9,521 $9,997 $10,497 $11,022 $11,573 Monthly $103,632 $108,816 $114,252 $119,964 $125,964 $132,264 $138,876 Annual $49.82 $52.32 $54.93 $57.68 $60.56 $63.59 $66.77 Hourly

0011 Senior Police Records CMC 561 $4,276 $4,490 $4,714 $4,950 $5,198 $5,458 $5,731 Monthly Technician $51,312 $53,880 $56,568 $59,400 $62,376 $65,496 $68,772 Annual $24.67 $25.90 $27.20 $28.56 $29.99 $31.49 $33.06 Hourly

0048 Senior Programmer Analyst CMC 710 $9,478 $9,952 $10,450 $10,973 $11,522 $12,098 $12,703 Monthly $113,736 $119,424 $125,400 $131,676 $138,264 $145,176 $152,436 Annual $54.68 $57.42 $60.29 $63.31 $66.47 $69.80 $73.29 Hourly

0050 Storekeeper CMC 588 $4,695 $4,930 $5,177 $5,436 $5,708 $5,993 $6,293 Monthly $56,340 $59,160 $62,124 $65,232 $68,496 $71,916 $75,516 Annual $27.09 $28.44 $29.87 $31.36 $32.93 $34.58 $36.31 Hourly

0089 Tax Auditing Specialist CMC 865 $6,068 $6,371 $6,690 $7,024 $7,375 $7,744 $8,131 Monthly $72,816 $76,452 $80,280 $84,288 $88,500 $92,928 $97,572 Annual $35.01 $36.76 $38.60 $40.52 $42.55 $44.68 $46.91 Hourly

0064 Treasury Specialist CMC 639 $6,068 $6,371 $6,690 $7,024 $7,375 $7,744 $8,131 Monthly $72,816 $76,452 $80,280 $84,288 $88,500 $92,928 $97,572 Annual $35.01 $36.76 $38.60 $40.52 $42.55 $44.68 $46.91 Hourly

0240 Video Production CMC 657 $7,092 $7,447 $7,819 $8,210 $8,620 $9,051 $9,504 Monthly Coordinator $85,104 $89,364 $93,828 $98,520 $103,440 $108,612 $114,048 Annual $40.92 $42.96 $45.11 $47.37 $49.73 $52.22 $54.83 Hourly

0241 Video Production Specialist CMC 885 $5,130 $5,387 $5,656 $5,939 $6,236 $6,548 $6,875 Monthly $61,560 $64,644 $67,872 $71,268 $74,832 $78,576 $82,500 Annual $29.60 $31.08 $32.63 $34.26 $35.98 $37.78 $39.66 Hourly

2029
Attachment 3

0038 Website Coordinator CMC 849 $4,644 $4,876 $5,120 $5,376 $5,645 $5,927 $6,223 Monthly $55,728 $58,512 $61,440 $64,512 $67,740 $71,124 $74,676 Annual $26.79 $28.13 $29.54 $31.02 $32.57 $34.19 $35.90 Hourly

0156 Zoning Administrator CMC 727 $9,105 $9,560 $10,038 $10,540 $11,067 $11,620 $12,201 Monthly $109,260 $114,720 $120,456 $126,480 $132,804 $139,440 $146,412 Annual $52.53 $55.15 $57.91 $60.81 $63.85 $67.04 $70.39 Hourly

SECTION 3. All parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________ ______________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2022-XX and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of November, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

2030
Attachment 3

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 16th day of November, 2022.

__________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

(SEAL)

2031
Attachment 4

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,

CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE PAY RANGES FOR JOB CLASSIFICATIONS

REPRESENTED BY THE COST A MESA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION PURSUANT TO THE 2022 - 2025 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022 , the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-XX, revising the pay ranges for job classifications represented by the Costa Mesa City Employees Association, effective the pay period that includes July 1, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to repeal and replace Resolution No. 2022- XX to revise the pay ranges for the classifications specified herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

Class Class Title Salary Grade Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Code Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0062 Accountant CMC 644 $7,046 $7,398 $7,768 $8,156 $8,564 $8,992 $9,442 Monthly $84,552 $88,776 $93,216 $97,872 $102,768 $107,904 $113,304 Annual $40.65 $42.68 $44.82 $47.05 $49.41 $51.88 $54.47 Hourly

0061 Accounting Specialist I CMC 577 $4,452 $4,675 $4,909 $5,154 $5,412 $5,683 $5,967 Monthly $53,424 $56,100 $58,908 $61,848 $64,944 $68,196 $71,604 Annual $25.68 $26.97 $28.32 $29.73 $31.22 $32.79 $34.43 Hourly

0060 Accounting Specialist II CMC 606 $5,145 $5,402 $5,672 $5,956 $6,254 $6,567 $6,895 Monthly $61,740 $64,824 $68,064 $71,472 $75,048 $78,804 $82,740 Annual $29.68 $31.17 $32.72 $34.36 $36.08 $37.89 $39.78 Hourly

2032
Attachment 4

0066 Accounting Supervisor CMC 697 $8,226 $8,637 $9,069 $9,522 $9,998 $10,498 $11,023 Monthly $98,712 $103,644 $108,828 $114,264 $119,976 $125,976 $132,276 Annual $47.46 $49.83 $52.32 $54.93 $57.68 $60.57 $63.59 Hourly

0107 Active Transportation CMC 732 $9,473 $9,947 $10,444 $10,966 $11,514 $12,090 $12,694 Monthly Coordinator $113,676 $119,364 $125,328 $131,592 $138,168 $145,080 $152,328 Annual $54.65 $57.39 $60.25 $63.27 $66.43 $69.75 $73.23 Hourly

0013 Administrative Assistant CMC 590 $5,229 $5,490 $5,765 $6,053 $6,356 $6,674 $7,008 Monthly $62,748 $65,880 $69,180 $72,636 $76,272 $80,088 $84,096 Annual $30.17 $31.67 $33.26 $34.92 $36.67 $38.50 $40.43 Hourly

0469 Animal Control Officer CMC 617 $5,831 $6,123 $6,429 $6,750 $7,088 $7,442 $7,814 Monthly $69,972 $73,476 $77,148 $81,000 $85,056 $89,304 $93,768 Annual $33.64 $35.33 $37.09 $38.94 $40.89 $42.93 $45.08 Hourly

0307 Arts Specialist CMC 733 $5,744 $6,031 $6,333 $6,650 $6,983 $7,332 $7,699 Monthly $68,928 $72,372 $75,996 $79,800 $83,796 $87,984 $92,388 Annual $33.14 $34.79 $36.54 $38.37 $40.29 $42.30 $44.42 Hourly

0103 Assistant Engineer CMC 672 $7,283 $7,647 $8,029 $8,430 $8,851 $9,294 $9,759 Monthly $87,396 $91,764 $96,348 $101,160 $106,212 $111,528 $117,108 Annual $42.02 $44.12 $46.32 $48.63 $51.06 $53.62 $56.30 Hourly

0217 Assistant Fire Marshal CMC 897 $7,241 $7,603 $7,983 $8,382 $8,801 $9,241 $9,703 Monthly $86,892 $91,236 $95,796 $100,584 $105,612 $110,892 $116,436 Annual $41.78 $43.86 $46.06 $48.36 $50.78 $53.31 $55.98 Hourly

0151 Assistant Planner CMC 889 $6,727 $7,063 $7,416 $7,787 $8,176 $8,585 $9,014 Monthly $80,724 $84,756 $88,992 $93,444 $98,112 $103,020 $108,168 Annual $38.81 $40.75 $42.78 $44.93 $47.17 $49.53 $52.00 Hourly

0301 Assistant Recreation CMC 625 $5,744 $6,031 $6,333 $6,650 $6,983 $7,332 $7,699 Monthly Supervisor $68,928 $72,372 $75,996 $79,800 $83,796 $87,984 $92,388 Annual $33.14 $34.79 $36.54 $38.37 $40.29 $42.30 $44.42 Hourly

0808 Assistant Storekeeper CMC 571 $4,445 $4,667 $4,900 $5,145 $5,402 $5,672 $5,956 Monthly $53,340 $56,004 $58,800 $61,740 $64,824 $68,064 $71,472 Annual $25.64 $26.93 $28.27 $29.68 $31.17 $32.72 $34.36 Hourly

2033
Attachment 4

0104 Associate Engineer CMC 699 $9,129 $9,585 $10,064 $10,567 $11,095 $11,650 $12,232 Monthly $109,548 $115,020 $120,768 $126,804 $133,140 $139,800 $146,784 Annual $52.67 $55.30 $58.06 $60.96 $64.01 $67.21 $70.57 Hourly

0152 Associate Planner CMC 649 $7,735 $8,122 $8,528 $8,954 $9,402 $9,872 $10,366 Monthly $92,820 $97,464 $102,336 $107,448 $112,824 $118,464 $124,392 Annual $44.63 $46.86 $49.20 $51.66 $54.24 $56.95 $59.80 Hourly

0132 Building Inspector I CMC 643 $6,840 $7,182 $7,541 $7,918 $8,314 $8,730 $9,166 Monthly $82,080 $86,184 $90,492 $95,016 $99,768 $104,760 $109,992 Annual $39.46 $41.43 $43.51 $45.68 $47.97 $50.37 $52.88 Hourly

0138 Building Inspector II CMC 866 $7,182 $7,541 $7,918 $8,314 $8,730 $9,166 $9,624 Monthly $86,184 $90,492 $95,016 $99,768 $104,760 $109,992 $115,488 Annual $41.43 $43.51 $45.68 $47.97 $50.37 $52.88 $55.52 Hourly

0130 Building Technician I CMC 581 $4,870 $5,114 $5,370 $5,638 $5,920 $6,216 $6,527 Monthly $58,440 $61,368 $64,440 $67,656 $71,040 $74,592 $78,324 Annual $28.10 $29.50 $30.98 $32.53 $34.15 $35.86 $37.66 Hourly

0131 Building Technician II CMC 613 $5,714 $6,000 $6,300 $6,615 $6,946 $7,293 $7,658 Monthly $68,568 $72,000 $75,600 $79,380 $83,352 $87,516 $91,896 Annual $32.97 $34.62 $36.35 $38.16 $40.07 $42.08 $44.18 Hourly

0088 Business License Inspector CMC 850 $5,147 $5,404 $5,674 $5,958 $6,256 $6,569 $6,897 Monthly $61,764 $64,848 $68,088 $71,496 $75,072 $78,828 $82,764 Annual $29.69 $31.18 $32.73 $34.37 $36.09 $37.90 $39.79 Hourly

0051 Buyer CMC 857 $5,877 $6,171 $6,480 $6,804 $7,144 $7,501 $7,876 Monthly $70,524 $74,052 $77,760 $81,648 $85,728 $90,012 $94,512 Annual $33.91 $35.60 $37.38 $39.25 $41.22 $43.28 $45.44 Hourly

0035 Central Services Supervisor CMC 655 $6,457 $6,780 $7,119 $7,475 $7,849 $8,241 $8,653 Monthly $77,484 $81,360 $85,428 $89,700 $94,188 $98,892 $103,836 Annual $37.25 $39.12 $41.07 $43.13 $45.28 $47.54 $49.92 Hourly

0123 Chief Construction Inspector CMC 662 $6,807 $7,147 $7,504 $7,879 $8,273 $8,687 $9,121 Monthly $81,684 $85,764 $90,048 $94,548 $99,276 $104,244 $109,452 Annual $39.27 $41.23 $43.29 $45.46 $47.73 $50.12 $52.62 Hourly

2034
Attachment 4

0110 Chief Plans Examiner CMC 718 $10,325 $10,841 $11,383 $11,952 $12,550 $13,177 $13,836 Monthly $123,900 $130,092 $136,596 $143,424 $150,600 $158,124 $166,032 Annual $59.57 $62.54 $65.67 $68.95 $72.40 $76.02 $79.82 Hourly

0126 Chief of Code Enforcement CMC 664 $6,870 $7,214 $7,575 $7,954 $8,352 $8,770 $9,208 Monthly $82,440 $86,568 $90,900 $95,448 $100,224 $105,240 $110,496 Annual $39.63 $41.62 $43.70 $45.89 $48.18 $50.60 $53.12 Hourly

0128 Chief of Inspection CMC 681 $8,690 $9,124 $9,580 $10,059 $10,562 $11,090 $11,645 Monthly $104,280 $109,488 $114,960 $120,708 $126,744 $133,080 $139,740 Annual $50.13 $52.64 $55.27 $58.03 $60.93 $63.98 $67.18 Hourly

0466 Civilian Investigator CMC 628 $6,045 $6,347 $6,664 $6,997 $7,347 $7,714 $8,100 Monthly $72,540 $76,164 $79,968 $83,964 $88,164 $92,568 $97,200 Annual $34.88 $36.62 $38.45 $40.37 $42.39 $44.50 $46.73 Hourly

0120 Code Enforcement Officer CMC 626 $5,687 $5,971 $6,270 $6,584 $6,913 $7,259 $7,622 Monthly $68,244 $71,652 $75,240 $79,008 $82,956 $87,108 $91,464 Annual $32.81 $34.45 $36.17 $37.98 $39.88 $41.88 $43.97 Hourly

0430 Communications Installer CMC 858 $5,559 $5,837 $6,129 $6,435 $6,757 $7,095 $7,450 Monthly $66,708 $70,044 $73,548 $77,220 $81,084 $85,140 $89,400 Annual $32.07 $33.68 $35.36 $37.13 $38.98 $40.93 $42.98 Hourly

0231 Communications Officer CMC 616 $6,040 $6,342 $6,659 $6,992 $7,342 $7,709 $8,094 Monthly $72,480 $76,104 $79,908 $83,904 $88,104 $92,508 $97,128 Annual $34.85 $36.59 $38.42 $40.34 $42.36 $44.48 $46.70 Hourly

0232 Communications Supervisor CMC 645 $6,978 $7,327 $7,693 $8,078 $8,482 $8,906 $9,351 Monthly $83,736 $87,924 $92,316 $96,936 $101,784 $106,872 $112,212 Annual $40.26 $42.27 $44.38 $46.60 $48.93 $51.38 $53.95 Hourly

0611 Community Outreach CMC 900 $7,049 $7,401 $7,771 $8,160 $8,568 $8,996 $9,446 Monthly Supervisor $84,588 $88,812 $93,252 $97,920 $102,816 $107,952 $113,352 Annual $40.67 $42.70 $44.83 $47.08 $49.43 $51.90 $54.50 Hourly

0610 Community Outreach CMC 893 $5,385 $5,654 $5,937 $6,234 $6,546 $6,873 $7,217 Monthly Worker $64,620 $67,848 $71,244 $74,808 $78,552 $82,476 $86,604 Annual $31.07 $32.62 $34.25 $35.97 $37.77 $39.65 $41.64 Hourly

2035
Attachment 4

0703 Community Services CMC 582 $4,897 $5,142 $5,399 $5,669 $5,952 $6,250 $6,562 Monthly Specialist $58,764 $61,704 $64,788 $68,028 $71,424 $75,000 $78,744 Annual $28.25 $29.67 $31.15 $32.71 $34.34 $36.06 $37.86 Hourly

0121 Construction Inspector CMC 867 $6,192 $6,502 $6,827 $7,168 $7,526 $7,902 $8,297 Monthly $74,304 $78,024 $81,924 $86,016 $90,312 $94,824 $99,564 Annual $35.72 $37.51 $39.39 $41.35 $43.42 $45.59 $47.87 Hourly

0100 Contract Administrator CMC 691 $8,006 $8,406 $8,826 $9,267 $9,730 $10,217 $10,728 Monthly $96,072 $100,872 $105,912 $111,204 $116,760 $122,604 $128,736 Annual $46.19 $48.50 $50.92 $53.46 $56.13 $58.94 $61.89 Hourly

0706 Court Liaison Officer CMC 854 $5,831 $6,123 $6,429 $6,750 $7,088 $7,442 $7,814 Monthly $69,972 $73,476 $77,148 $81,000 $85,056 $89,304 $93,768 Annual $33.64 $35.33 $37.09 $38.94 $40.89 $42.93 $45.08 Hourly

0099 Crime Analyst CMC 859 $6,045 $6,347 $6,664 $6,997 $7,347 $7,714 $8,100 Monthly $72,540 $76,164 $79,968 $83,964 $88,164 $92,568 $97,200 Annual $34.88 $36.62 $38.45 $40.37 $42.39 $44.50 $46.73 Hourly

0467 Crime Prevention Specialist CMC 852 $5,717 $6,003 $6,303 $6,618 $6,949 $7,296 $7,661 Monthly $68,604 $72,036 $75,636 $79,416 $83,388 $87,552 $91,932 Annual $32.98 $34.63 $36.36 $38.18 $40.09 $42.09 $44.20 Hourly

0189 Crime Scene Investigation CMC 50 $8,750 $9,187 $9,646 $10,128 $10,634 $11,166 $11,724 Monthly Supervisor $105,000 $110,244 $115,752 $121,536 $127,608 $133,992 $140,688 Annual $50.48 $53.00 $55.65 $58.43 $61.35 $64.42 $67.64 Hourly

0465 Crime Scene Specialist CMC 638 $5,925 $6,221 $6,532 $6,859 $7,202 $7,562 $7,940 Monthly $71,100 $74,652 $78,384 $82,308 $86,424 $90,744 $95,280 Annual $34.18 $35.89 $37.68 $39.57 $41.55 $43.63 $45.81 Hourly

0705 Custody Officer CMC 854 $5,831 $6,123 $6,429 $6,750 $7,088 $7,442 $7,814 Monthly $69,972 $73,476 $77,148 $81,000 $85,056 $89,304 $93,768 Annual $33.64 $35.33 $37.09 $38.94 $40.89 $42.93 $45.08 Hourly

0190 Custody Supervisor CMC 612 $8,750 $9,187 $9,646 $10,128 $10,634 $11,166 $11,724 Monthly $105,000 $110,244 $115,752 $121,536 $127,608 $133,992 $140,688 Annual $50.48 $53.00 $55.65 $58.43 $61.35 $64.42 $67.64 Hourly

2036
Attachment 4

0149 Economic Development CMC 898 $10,229 $10,740 $11,277 $11,841 $12,433 $13,055 $13,708 Monthly Administrator $122,748 $128,880 $135,324 $142,092 $149,196 $156,660 $164,496 Annual $59.01 $61.96 $65.06 $68.31 $71.73 $75.32 $79.08 Hourly

0134 Electrical Inspector CMC 868 $6,192 $6,502 $6,827 $7,168 $7,526 $7,902 $8,297 Monthly $74,304 $78,024 $81,924 $86,016 $90,312 $94,824 $99,564 Annual $35.72 $37.51 $39.39 $41.35 $43.42 $45.59 $47.87 Hourly

0431 Electronics Technician CMC 875 $6,920 $7,266 $7,629 $8,010 $8,411 $8,832 $9,274 Monthly $83,040 $87,192 $91,548 $96,120 $100,932 $105,984 $111,288 Annual $39.92 $41.92 $44.01 $46.21 $48.53 $50.95 $53.50 Hourly

0221 Emergency Medical CMC 706 $8,579 $9,008 $9,458 $9,931 $10,428 $10,949 $11,496 Monthly Services Coordinator $102,948 $108,096 $113,496 $119,172 $125,136 $131,388 $137,952 Annual $49.49 $51.97 $54.57 $57.29 $60.16 $63.17 $66.32 Hourly

0096 Emergency Services CMC 53 $9,406 $9,876 $10,370 $10,888 $11,432 $12,004 $12,604 Monthly Administrator $112,872 $118,512 $124,440 $130,656 $137,184 $144,048 $151,248 Annual $54.27 $56.98 $59.83 $62.82 $65.95 $69.25 $72.72 Hourly

0234 Emergency Services CMC 860 $5,814 $6,105 $6,410 $6,731 $7,068 $7,421 $7,792 Monthly Training Specialist $69,768 $73,260 $76,920 $80,772 $84,816 $89,052 $93,504 Annual $33.54 $35.22 $36.98 $38.83 $40.78 $42.81 $44.95 Hourly

0101 Engineering Technician I CMC 591 $5,120 $5,376 $5,645 $5,927 $6,223 $6,534 $6,861 Monthly $61,440 $64,512 $67,740 $71,124 $74,676 $78,408 $82,332 Annual $29.54 $31.02 $32.57 $34.19 $35.90 $37.70 $39.58 Hourly

0102 Engineering Technician II CMC 853 $5,714 $6,000 $6,300 $6,615 $6,946 $7,293 $7,658 Monthly $68,568 $72,000 $75,600 $79,380 $83,352 $87,516 $91,896 Annual $32.97 $34.62 $36.35 $38.16 $40.07 $42.08 $44.18 Hourly

0116 Engineering Technician III CMC 632 $6,281 $6,595 $6,925 $7,271 $7,635 $8,017 $8,418 Monthly $75,372 $79,140 $83,100 $87,252 $91,620 $96,204 $101,016 Annual $36.24 $38.05 $39.95 $41.95 $44.05 $46.25 $48.57 Hourly

0440 Equipment Mechanic I CMC 570 $4,311 $4,527 $4,753 $4,991 $5,241 $5,503 $5,778 Monthly $51,732 $54,324 $57,036 $59,892 $62,892 $66,036 $69,336 Annual $24.87 $26.12 $27.42 $28.79 $30.24 $31.75 $33.33 Hourly

2037
Attachment 4

0441 Equipment Mechanic II CMC 851 $5,160 $5,418 $5,689 $5,973 $6,272 $6,586 $6,915 Monthly $61,920 $65,016 $68,268 $71,676 $75,264 $79,032 $82,980 Annual $29.77 $31.26 $32.82 $34.46 $36.18 $38.00 $39.89 Hourly

0445 Equipment Mechanic III CMC 856 $5,560 $5,838 $6,130 $6,436 $6,758 $7,096 $7,451 Monthly $66,720 $70,056 $73,560 $77,232 $81,096 $85,152 $89,412 Annual $32.08 $33.68 $35.37 $37.13 $38.99 $40.94 $42.99 Hourly

0014 Executive Assistant CMC 609 $5,752 $6,040 $6,342 $6,659 $6,992 $7,342 $7,709 Monthly $69,024 $72,480 $76,104 $79,908 $83,904 $88,104 $92,508 Annual $33.18 $34.85 $36.59 $38.42 $40.34 $42.36 $44.48 Hourly

0407 Facilities Maintenance CMC 589 $5,013 $5,264 $5,527 $5,803 $6,093 $6,398 $6,718 Monthly Technician $60,156 $63,168 $66,324 $69,636 $73,116 $76,776 $80,616 Annual $28.92 $30.37 $31.89 $33.48 $35.15 $36.91 $38.76 Hourly

0304 Fairview Park Administrator CMC 887 $8,613 $9,044 $9,496 $9,971 $10,470 $10,994 $11,544 Monthly $103,356 $108,528 $113,952 $119,652 $125,640 $131,928 $138,528 Annual $49.69 $52.18 $54.78 $57.53 $60.40 $63.43 $66.60 Hourly

0057 Financial Analyst CMC 899 $7,630 $8,012 $8,413 $8,834 $9,276 $9,740 $10,227 Monthly $91,560 $96,144 $100,956 $106,008 $111,312 $116,880 $122,724 Annual $44.02 $46.22 $48.54 $50.97 $53.52 $56.19 $59.00 Hourly

0218 Fire Protection Analyst CMC 876 $7,241 $7,603 $7,983 $8,382 $8,801 $9,241 $9,703 Monthly $86,892 $91,236 $95,796 $100,584 $105,612 $110,892 $116,436 Annual $41.78 $43.86 $46.06 $48.36 $50.78 $53.31 $55.98 Hourly

0215 Fire Protection Specialist CMC 861 $6,840 $7,182 $7,541 $7,918 $8,314 $8,730 $9,166 Monthly $82,080 $86,184 $90,492 $95,016 $99,768 $104,760 $109,992 Annual $39.46 $41.43 $43.51 $45.68 $47.97 $50.37 $52.88 Hourly

0065 Grant Administrator CMC 877 $7,520 $7,896 $8,291 $8,706 $9,141 $9,598 $10,078 Monthly $90,240 $94,752 $99,492 $104,472 $109,692 $115,176 $120,936 Annual $43.38 $45.55 $47.83 $50.23 $52.74 $55.37 $58.14 Hourly

0029 Graphics Designer CMC 610 $5,157 $5,415 $5,686 $5,970 $6,268 $6,581 $6,910 Monthly $61,884 $64,980 $68,232 $71,640 $75,216 $78,972 $82,920 Annual $29.75 $31.24 $32.80 $34.44 $36.16 $37.97 $39.87 Hourly

2038
Attachment 4

0446 Lead Equipment Mechanic CMC 869 $6,269 $6,582 $6,911 $7,257 $7,620 $8,001 $8,401 Monthly $75,228 $78,984 $82,932 $87,084 $91,440 $96,012 $100,812 Annual $36.17 $37.97 $39.87 $41.87 $43.96 $46.16 $48.47 Hourly

0409 Lead Facilities CMC 863 $5,890 $6,184 $6,493 $6,818 $7,159 $7,517 $7,893 Monthly Maintenance Technician $70,680 $74,208 $77,916 $81,816 $85,908 $90,204 $94,716 Annual $33.98 $35.68 $37.46 $39.33 $41.30 $43.37 $45.54 Hourly

0405 Lead Maintenance Worker CMC 864 $5,890 $6,184 $6,493 $6,818 $7,159 $7,517 $7,893 Monthly $70,680 $74,208 $77,916 $81,816 $85,908 $90,204 $94,716 Annual $33.98 $35.68 $37.46 $39.33 $41.30 $43.37 $45.54 Hourly

0402 Maintenance Assistant CMC 550 $4,031 $4,233 $4,445 $4,667 $4,900 $5,145 $5,402 Monthly $48,372 $50,796 $53,340 $56,004 $58,800 $61,740 $64,824 Annual $23.26 $24.42 $25.64 $26.93 $28.27 $29.68 $31.17 Hourly

0412 Maintenance CMC 881 $7,990 $8,389 $8,808 $9,248 $9,710 $10,195 $10,705 Monthly Superintendent $95,880 $100,668 $105,696 $110,976 $116,520 $122,340 $128,460 Annual $46.10 $48.40 $50.82 $53.35 $56.02 $58.82 $61.76 Hourly

0406 Maintenance Supervisor CMC 670 $6,911 $7,257 $7,620 $8,001 $8,401 $8,821 $9,262 Monthly $82,932 $87,084 $91,440 $96,012 $100,812 $105,852 $111,144 Annual $39.87 $41.87 $43.96 $46.16 $48.47 $50.89 $53.43 Hourly

0403 Maintenance Worker CMC 846 $4,454 $4,677 $4,911 $5,157 $5,415 $5,686 $5,970 Monthly $53,448 $56,124 $58,932 $61,884 $64,980 $68,232 $71,640 Annual $25.70 $26.98 $28.33 $29.75 $31.24 $32.80 $34.44 Hourly

0243 Management Aide CMC 892 $5,917 $6,213 $6,524 $6,850 $7,192 $7,552 $7,930 Monthly $71,004 $74,556 $78,288 $82,200 $86,304 $90,624 $95,160 Annual $34.14 $35.84 $37.64 $39.52 $41.49 $43.57 $45.75 Hourly

0074 Management Analyst CMC 872 $6,805 $7,145 $7,502 $7,877 $8,271 $8,685 $9,119 Monthly $81,660 $85,740 $90,024 $94,524 $99,252 $104,220 $109,428 Annual $39.26 $41.22 $43.28 $45.44 $47.72 $50.11 $52.61 Hourly

0001 Messenger CMC 501 $4,038 $4,240 $4,452 $4,675 $4,909 $5,154 $5,412 Monthly $48,456 $50,880 $53,424 $56,100 $58,908 $61,848 $64,944 Annual $23.30 $24.46 $25.68 $26.97 $28.32 $29.73 $31.22 Hourly

2039
Attachment 4

0041 Network Systems CMC 631 $8,390 $8,810 $9,251 $9,714 $10,200 $10,710 $11,246 Monthly Administrator $100,680 $105,720 $111,012 $116,568 $122,400 $128,520 $134,952 Annual $48.40 $50.83 $53.37 $56.04 $58.85 $61.79 $64.88 Hourly

0006 Office Coordinator CMC 848 $4,860 $5,103 $5,358 $5,626 $5,907 $6,202 $6,512 Monthly $58,320 $61,236 $64,296 $67,512 $70,884 $74,424 $78,144 Annual $28.04 $29.44 $30.91 $32.46 $34.08 $35.78 $37.57 Hourly

0003 Office Specialist CMC 525 $3,527 $3,703 $3,888 $4,082 $4,286 $4,500 $4,725 Monthly $42,324 $44,436 $46,656 $48,984 $51,432 $54,000 $56,700 Annual $20.35 $21.36 $22.43 $23.55 $24.73 $25.96 $27.26 Hourly

0004 Office Specialist I CMC 545 $3,895 $4,090 $4,295 $4,510 $4,736 $4,973 $5,222 Monthly $46,740 $49,080 $51,540 $54,120 $56,832 $59,676 $62,664 Annual $22.47 $23.60 $24.78 $26.02 $27.32 $28.69 $30.13 Hourly

0005 Office Specialist II CMC 845 $4,200 $4,410 $4,630 $4,862 $5,105 $5,360 $5,628 Monthly $50,400 $52,920 $55,560 $58,344 $61,260 $64,320 $67,536 Annual $24.23 $25.44 $26.71 $28.05 $29.45 $30.92 $32.47 Hourly

0031 Offset Press Operator I CMC 847 $4,507 $4,732 $4,969 $5,217 $5,478 $5,752 $6,040 Monthly $54,084 $56,784 $59,628 $62,604 $65,736 $69,024 $72,480 Annual $26.00 $27.30 $28.67 $30.10 $31.60 $33.18 $34.85 Hourly

0034 Offset Press Operator II CMC 595 $4,783 $5,022 $5,273 $5,537 $5,814 $6,105 $6,410 Monthly $57,396 $60,264 $63,276 $66,444 $69,768 $73,260 $76,920 Annual $27.59 $28.97 $30.42 $31.94 $33.54 $35.22 $36.98 Hourly

0521 Park Ranger CMC 725 $5,385 $5,654 $5,937 $6,234 $6,546 $6,873 $7,217 Monthly $64,620 $67,848 $71,244 $74,808 $78,552 $82,476 $86,604 Annual $31.07 $32.62 $34.25 $35.97 $37.77 $39.65 $41.64 Hourly

0028 Permit Processing CMC 569 $4,392 $4,612 $4,843 $5,085 $5,339 $5,606 $5,886 Monthly Specialist $52,704 $55,344 $58,116 $61,020 $64,068 $67,272 $70,632 Annual $25.34 $26.61 $27.94 $29.34 $30.80 $32.34 $33.96 Hourly

0039 Personal Computer/ CMC 849 $4,783 $5,022 $5,273 $5,537 $5,814 $6,105 $6,410 Monthly Network Assistant $57,396 $60,264 $63,276 $66,444 $69,768 $73,260 $76,920 Annual $27.59 $28.97 $30.42 $31.94 $33.54 $35.22 $36.98 Hourly

2040
Attachment 4

0109 Plan Check Engineer CMC 883 $9,473 $9,947 $10,444 $10,966 $11,514 $12,090 $12,694 Monthly $113,676 $119,364 $125,328 $131,592 $138,168 $145,080 $152,328 Annual $54.65 $57.39 $60.25 $63.27 $66.43 $69.75 $73.23 Hourly

0114 Plan Checker CMC 886 $8,235 $8,647 $9,079 $9,533 $10,010 $10,511 $11,037 Monthly $98,820 $103,764 $108,948 $114,396 $120,120 $126,132 $132,444 Annual $47.51 $49.89 $52.38 $55.00 $57.75 $60.64 $63.68 Hourly

0095 Police Records CMC 52 $9,406 $9,876 $10,370 $10,888 $11,432 $12,004 $12,604 Monthly Administrator $112,872 $118,512 $124,440 $130,656 $137,184 $144,048 $151,248 Annual $54.27 $56.98 $59.83 $62.82 $65.95 $69.25 $72.72 Hourly

0461 Police Records Bureau CMC 842 $8,750 $9,187 $9,646 $10,128 $10,634 $11,166 $11,724 Monthly Supervisor $105,000 $110,244 $115,752 $121,536 $127,608 $133,992 $140,688 Annual $50.48 $53.00 $55.65 $58.43 $61.35 $64.42 $67.64 Hourly

0012 Police Records Shift CMC 594 $5,194 $5,454 $5,727 $6,013 $6,314 $6,630 $6,961 Monthly Supervisor $62,328 $65,448 $68,724 $72,156 $75,768 $79,560 $83,532 Annual $29.97 $31.47 $33.04 $34.69 $36.43 $38.25 $40.16 Hourly

0010 Police Records Technician CMC 546 $4,089 $4,293 $4,508 $4,733 $4,970 $5,219 $5,480 Monthly $49,068 $51,516 $54,096 $56,796 $59,640 $62,628 $65,760 Annual $23.59 $24.77 $26.01 $27.31 $28.67 $30.11 $31.62 Hourly

0460 Police Training CMC 844 $9,406 $9,876 $10,370 $10,888 $11,432 $12,004 $12,604 Monthly Administrator $112,872 $118,512 $124,440 $130,656 $137,184 $144,048 $151,248 Annual $54.27 $56.98 $59.83 $62.82 $65.95 $69.25 $72.72 Hourly

0459 Police Training Assistant CMC 862 $6,251 $6,564 $6,892 $7,237 $7,599 $7,979 $8,378 Monthly $75,012 $78,768 $82,704 $86,844 $91,188 $95,748 $100,536 Annual $36.06 $37.87 $39.76 $41.75 $43.84 $46.03 $48.33 Hourly

0106 Principal Civil Engineer CMC 726 $11,547 $12,124 $12,730 $13,367 $14,035 $14,737 $15,474 Monthly $138,564 $145,488 $152,760 $160,404 $168,420 $176,844 $185,688 Annual $66.62 $69.95 $73.44 $77.12 $80.97 $85.02 $89.27 Hourly

0154 Principal Planner CMC 704 $10,229 $10,740 $11,277 $11,841 $12,433 $13,055 $13,708 Monthly $122,748 $128,880 $135,324 $142,092 $149,196 $156,660 $164,496 Annual $59.01 $61.96 $65.06 $68.31 $71.73 $75.32 $79.08 Hourly

2041
Attachment 4

0043 Programmer Analyst I CMC 870 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 $8,601 $9,031 $9,483 $9,957 Monthly $89,160 $93,612 $98,292 $103,212 $108,372 $113,796 $119,484 Annual $42.87 $45.01 $47.26 $49.62 $52.10 $54.71 $57.44 Hourly

0044 Programmer Analyst II CMC 692 $8,916 $9,362 $9,830 $10,322 $10,838 $11,380 $11,949 Monthly $106,992 $112,344 $117,960 $123,864 $130,056 $136,560 $143,388 Annual $51.44 $54.01 $56.71 $59.55 $62.53 $65.65 $68.94 Hourly

0463 Property/Evidence CMC 623 $5,498 $5,773 $6,062 $6,365 $6,683 $7,017 $7,368 Monthly Specialist $65,976 $69,276 $72,744 $76,380 $80,196 $84,204 $88,416 Annual $31.72 $33.31 $34.97 $36.72 $38.56 $40.48 $42.51 Hourly

0462 Property/Evidence CMC 843 $8,750 $9,187 $9,646 $10,128 $10,634 $11,166 $11,724 Monthly Supervisor $105,000 $110,244 $115,752 $121,536 $127,608 $133,992 $140,688 Annual $50.48 $53.00 $55.65 $58.43 $61.35 $64.42 $67.64 Hourly

0124 Public Right of Way CMC 731 $5,687 $5,971 $6,270 $6,584 $6,913 $7,259 $7,622 Monthly Coordinator $68,244 $71,652 $75,240 $79,008 $82,956 $87,108 $91,464 Annual $32.81 $34.45 $36.17 $37.98 $39.88 $41.88 $43.97 Hourly

0053 Purchasing Supervisor CMC 879 $8,226 $8,637 $9,069 $9,522 $9,998 $10,498 $11,023 Monthly $98,712 $103,644 $108,828 $114,264 $119,976 $125,976 $132,276 Annual $47.46 $49.83 $52.32 $54.93 $57.68 $60.57 $63.59 Hourly

0468 Range Master CMC 855 $5,831 $6,123 $6,429 $6,750 $7,088 $7,442 $7,814 Monthly $69,972 $73,476 $77,148 $81,000 $85,056 $89,304 $93,768 Annual $33.64 $35.33 $37.09 $38.94 $40.89 $42.93 $45.08 Hourly

0290 Recreation Coordinator CMC 583 $4,657 $4,890 $5,134 $5,391 $5,661 $5,944 $6,241 Monthly $55,884 $58,680 $61,608 $64,692 $67,932 $71,328 $74,892 Annual $26.87 $28.21 $29.62 $31.10 $32.66 $34.29 $36.01 Hourly

0508 Recreation Specialist CMC 890 $3,575 $3,754 $3,942 $4,139 $4,346 $4,563 $4,791 Monthly $42,900 $45,048 $47,304 $49,668 $52,152 $54,756 $57,492 Annual $20.63 $21.66 $22.74 $23.88 $25.07 $26.33 $27.64 Hourly

0302 Recreation Supervisor CMC 666 $7,049 $7,401 $7,771 $8,160 $8,568 $8,996 $9,446 Monthly $84,588 $88,812 $93,252 $97,920 $102,816 $107,952 $113,352 Annual $40.67 $42.70 $44.83 $47.08 $49.43 $51.90 $54.50 Hourly

2042
Attachment 4

0058 Revenue Supervisor CMC 880 $8,226 $8,637 $9,069 $9,522 $9,998 $10,498 $11,023 Monthly $98,712 $103,644 $108,828 $114,264 $119,976 $125,976 $132,276 Annual $47.46 $49.83 $52.32 $54.93 $57.68 $60.57 $63.59 Hourly

0067 Senior Accountant CMC 663 $7,749 $8,136 $8,543 $8,970 $9,419 $9,890 $10,385 Monthly $92,988 $97,632 $102,516 $107,640 $113,028 $118,680 $124,620 Annual $44.71 $46.94 $49.29 $51.75 $54.34 $57.06 $59.91 Hourly

0119 Senior Code Enforcement CMC 896 $6,112 $6,418 $6,739 $7,076 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 Monthly Officer $73,344 $77,016 $80,868 $84,912 $89,160 $93,612 $98,292 Annual $35.26 $37.03 $38.88 $40.82 $42.87 $45.01 $47.26 Hourly

0139 Senior Combination CMC 874 $7,900 $8,295 $8,710 $9,146 $9,603 $10,083 $10,587 Monthly Inspector $94,800 $99,540 $104,520 $109,752 $115,236 $120,996 $127,044 Annual $45.58 $47.86 $50.25 $52.77 $55.40 $58.17 $61.08 Hourly

0238 Senior Communications CMC 630 $6,490 $6,815 $7,156 $7,514 $7,890 $8,285 $8,699 Monthly Officer $77,880 $81,780 $85,872 $90,168 $94,680 $99,420 $104,388 Annual $37.44 $39.32 $41.28 $43.35 $45.52 $47.80 $50.19 Hourly

0233 Senior Communications CMC 667 $8,750 $9,187 $9,646 $10,128 $10,634 $11,166 $11,724 Monthly Supervisor $105,000 $110,244 $115,752 $121,536 $127,608 $133,992 $140,688 Annual $50.48 $53.00 $55.65 $58.43 $61.35 $64.42 $67.64 Hourly

0136 Senior Electrical Inspector CMC 873 $6,841 $7,183 $7,542 $7,919 $8,315 $8,731 $9,168 Monthly $82,092 $86,196 $90,504 $95,028 $99,780 $104,772 $110,016 Annual $39.47 $41.44 $43.51 $45.69 $47.97 $50.37 $52.89 Hourly

0105 Senior Engineer CMC 884 $10,041 $10,543 $11,070 $11,623 $12,204 $12,814 $13,455 Monthly $120,492 $126,516 $132,840 $139,476 $146,448 $153,768 $161,460 Annual $57.93 $60.83 $63.87 $67.06 $70.41 $73.93 $77.63 Hourly

0432 Senior Lead Maintenance CMC 871 $6,414 $6,735 $7,072 $7,426 $7,797 $8,187 $8,596 Monthly Worker $76,968 $80,820 $84,864 $89,112 $93,564 $98,244 $103,152 Annual $37.00 $38.86 $40.80 $42.84 $44.98 $47.23 $49.59 Hourly

0433 Senior Maintenance CMC 597 $5,096 $5,351 $5,619 $5,900 $6,195 $6,505 $6,830 Monthly Technician $61,152 $64,212 $67,428 $70,800 $74,340 $78,060 $81,960 Annual $29.40 $30.87 $32.42 $34.04 $35.74 $37.53 $39.40 Hourly

2043
Attachment 4

0404 Senior Maintenance Worker CMC 587 $4,848 $5,090 $5,345 $5,612 $5,893 $6,188 $6,497 Monthly $58,176 $61,080 $64,140 $67,344 $70,716 $74,256 $77,964 Annual $27.97 $29.37 $30.84 $32.38 $34.00 $35.70 $37.48 Hourly

0244 Senior Management Analyst CMC 895 $7,144 $7,501 $7,876 $8,270 $8,684 $9,118 $9,574 Monthly $85,728 $90,012 $94,512 $99,240 $104,208 $109,416 $114,888 Annual $41.22 $43.28 $45.44 $47.71 $50.10 $52.60 $55.23 Hourly

0153 Senior Planner CMC 878 $8,894 $9,339 $9,806 $10,296 $10,811 $11,352 $11,920 Monthly $106,728 $112,068 $117,672 $123,552 $129,732 $136,224 $143,040 Annual $51.31 $53.88 $56.57 $59.40 $62.37 $65.49 $68.77 Hourly

0011 Senior Police Records CMC 561 $4,405 $4,625 $4,856 $5,099 $5,354 $5,622 $5,903 Monthly Technician $52,860 $55,500 $58,272 $61,188 $64,248 $67,464 $70,836 Annual $25.41 $26.68 $28.02 $29.42 $30.89 $32.43 $34.06 Hourly

0048 Senior Programmer Analyst CMC 710 $9,764 $10,252 $10,765 $11,303 $11,868 $12,461 $13,084 Monthly $117,168 $123,024 $129,180 $135,636 $142,416 $149,532 $157,008 Annual $56.33 $59.15 $62.11 $65.21 $68.47 $71.89 $75.48 Hourly

0050 Storekeeper CMC 588 $4,836 $5,078 $5,332 $5,599 $5,879 $6,173 $6,482 Monthly $58,032 $60,936 $63,984 $67,188 $70,548 $74,076 $77,784 Annual $27.90 $29.30 $30.76 $32.30 $33.92 $35.61 $37.40 Hourly

0089 Tax Auditing Specialist CMC 865 $6,250 $6,562 $6,890 $7,234 $7,596 $7,976 $8,375 Monthly $75,000 $78,744 $82,680 $86,808 $91,152 $95,712 $100,500 Annual $36.06 $37.86 $39.75 $41.73 $43.82 $46.02 $48.32 Hourly

0064 Treasury Specialist CMC 639 $6,250 $6,562 $6,890 $7,234 $7,596 $7,976 $8,375 Monthly $75,000 $78,744 $82,680 $86,808 $91,152 $95,712 $100,500 Annual $36.06 $37.86 $39.75 $41.73 $43.82 $46.02 $48.32 Hourly

0240 Video Production CMC 657 $7,305 $7,670 $8,053 $8,456 $8,879 $9,323 $9,789 Monthly Coordinator $87,660 $92,040 $96,636 $101,472 $106,548 $111,876 $117,468 Annual $42.14 $44.25 $46.46 $48.78 $51.23 $53.79 $56.48 Hourly

0241 Video Production Specialist CMC 885 $5,285 $5,549 $5,826 $6,117 $6,423 $6,744 $7,081 Monthly $63,420 $66,588 $69,912 $73,404 $77,076 $80,928 $84,972 Annual $30.49 $32.01 $33.61 $35.29 $37.06 $38.91 $40.85 Hourly

2044
Attachment 4

0038 Website Coordinator CMC 849 $4,783 $5,022 $5,273 $5,537 $5,814 $6,105 $6,410 Monthly $57,396 $60,264 $63,276 $66,444 $69,768 $73,260 $76,920 Annual $27.59 $28.97 $30.42 $31.94 $33.54 $35.22 $36.98 Hourly

0156 Zoning Administrator CMC 727 $9,378 $9,847 $10,339 $10,856 $11,399 $11,969 $12,567 Monthly $112,536 $118,164 $124,068 $130,272 $136,788 $143,628 $150,804 Annual $54.10 $56.81 $59.65 $62.63 $65.76 $69.05 $72.50 Hourly

SECTION 3. All parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________ ______________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

2045
Attachment 4

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 16th day of November, 2022.

__________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

(SEAL)

2046
Attachment 5

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,

CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE PAY RANGE S FOR CLASSIFICATION S IN THE

CONFIDENTIAL UNIT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on June 7, 2022 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-41, revising the pay ranges for job classifications in the Confidential Unit, effective June 19, 2022; and

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to repeal and replace Resolution No. 2022- 41 to revise the pay ranges for the classifications specified herein; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

SECTION 1. Employer-Employee Organization Relations Resolution No. 95 -63, as authorized under the California Government Code (Section 3500, et seq.), defines “Employee, Confidential” as any employee whose normal duties would give the employee access to decisions or the decision-making processes of the City concerning any matters relating to employer -employee relations; and said Resolution sets forth the “Policy and Standards for Determination of Appropriate Units”, including the provision that confidential responsibilities are determining factors in establishing appropriate units. Accordingly, specific positions have been determined by the City Manager (Employee Relations Officer) as having access to or preparing confidential materials and/or information and/or recommendations on behalf of the City in matters relating to employer-employee relations and are included in this Confidential Employees Unit.

SECTION 2. The following positions of the Office of the City Manager, Finance Department and Information Technology Department, placed under the Confidential Unit Salary Schedule, are hereby revised to reflect the salary ranges and monthly rates of pay specified, effective the pay period that includes pay date of January 6, 2023. The monthly rate of pay may also be in increments between the monthly minimum and maximum pay step.

Class Class Title Salary Grade Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Code Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0171 Accountant CON 620 $6,740 $7,077 $7,431 $7,803 $8,193 $8,603 $9,033 Monthly (Confidential) $80,880 $84,924 $89,172 $93,636 $98,316 $103,236 $108,396 Annual $38.88 $40.83 $42.87 $45.02 $47.27 $49.63 $52.11 Hourly

0026 Administrative Assistant CON 593 $5,002 $5,252 $5,515 $5,791 $6,081 $6,385 $6,704 Monthly (Confidential) $60,024 $63,024 $66,180 $69,492 $72,972 $76,620 $80,448 Annual $28.86 $30.30 $31.82 $33.41 $35.08 $36.84 $38.68 Hourly

2047
Attachment 5

0018 Benefits Coordinator CON 592 $4,892 $5,137 $5,394 $5,664 $5,947 $6,244 $6,556 Monthly $58,704 $61,644 $64,728 $67,968 $71,364 $74,928 $78,672 Annual $28.22 $29.64 $31.12 $32.68 $34.31 $36.02 $37.82 Hourly

0063 Budget Analyst CON 679 $7,193 $7,553 $7,931 $8,328 $8,744 $9,181 $9,640 Monthly $86,316 $90,636 $95,172 $99,936 $104,928 $110,172 $115,680 Annual $41.50 $43.58 $45.76 $48.05 $50.45 $52.97 $55.62 Hourly

0809 Budget Specialist CON 891 $5,979 $6,278 $6,592 $6,922 $7,268 $7,631 $8,013 Monthly $71,748 $75,336 $79,104 $83,064 $87,216 $91,572 $96,156 Annual $34.49 $36.22 $38.03 $39.93 $41.93 $44.03 $46.23 Hourly

0040 Computer Operations/ CON 689 $8,439 $8,861 $9,304 $9,769 $10,257 $10,770 $11,309 Monthly Networking Supervisor $101,268 $106,332 $111,648 $117,228 $123,084 $129,240 $135,708 Annual $48.69 $51.12 $53.68 $56.36 $59.18 $62.13 $65.24 Hourly

0021 Deputy City Clerk CON 656 $5,717 $6,003 $6,303 $6,618 $6,949 $7,296 $7,661 Monthly $68,604 $72,036 $75,636 $79,416 $83,388 $87,552 $91,932 Annual $32.98 $34.63 $36.36 $38.18 $40.09 $42.09 $44.20 Hourly

0016 Executive Assistant to CON 648 $6,714 $7,050 $7,402 $7,772 $8,161 $8,569 $8,997 Monthly the City Manager $80,568 $84,600 $88,824 $93,264 $97,932 $102,828 $107,964 Annual $38.73 $40.67 $42.70 $44.84 $47.08 $49.44 $51.91 Hourly

0019 Executive Assistant CON 609 $5,504 $5,779 $6,068 $6,371 $6,690 $7,025 $7,376 Monthly (Confidential) $66,048 $69,348 $72,816 $76,452 $80,280 $84,300 $88,512 Annual $31.75 $33.34 $35.01 $36.76 $38.60 $40.53 $42.55 Hourly

0007 Human Resources CON 560 $4,019 $4,220 $4,431 $4,653 $4,886 $5,130 $5,386 Monthly Offices Specialist II $48,228 $50,640 $53,172 $55,836 $58,632 $61,560 $64,632 Annual $23.19 $24.35 $25.56 $26.84 $28.19 $29.60 $31.07 Hourly

0087 Human Resources CON 697 $8,257 $8,670 $9,104 $9,559 $10,037 $10,539 $11,066 Monthly Administrator $99,084 $104,040 $109,248 $114,708 $120,444 $126,468 $132,792 Annual $47.64 $50.02 $52.52 $55.15 $57.91 $60.80 $63.84 Hourly

0079
Human Resources
Analyst CON 659 $6,830 $7,171 $7,530 $7,906 $8,301 $8,716 $9,152 Monthly $81,960 $86,052 $90,360 $94,872 $99,612 $104,592 $109,824 Annual $39.40 $41.37 $43.44 $45.61 $47.89 $50.28 $52.80 Hourly

0017 Human Resources CON 590 $5,002 $5,252 $5,515 $5,791 $6,081 $6,385 $6,704 Monthly Assistant $60,024 $63,024 $66,180 $69,492 $72,972 $76,620 $80,448 Annual $28.86 $30.30 $31.82 $33.41 $35.08 $36.84 $38.68 Hourly

2048
Attachment 5

0072 Human Resources CON 627 $5,824 $6,115 $6,421 $6,742 $7,079 $7,433 $7,805 Monthly Technician $69,888 $73,380 $77,052 $80,904 $84,948 $89,196 $93,660 Annual $33.60 $35.28 $37.04 $38.90 $40.84 $42.88 $45.03 Hourly

0245 Management Aide CON 892 $5,661 $5,944 $6,241 $6,553 $6,881 $7,225 $7,586 Monthly (Confidential) $67,932 $71,328 $74,892 $78,636 $82,572 $86,700 $91,032 Annual $32.66 $34.29 $36.01 $37.81 $39.70 $41.68 $43.77 Hourly

0084 Management Analyst CON 872 $6,510 $6,835 $7,177 $7,536 $7,913 $8,309 $8,724 Monthly (Confidential) $78,120 $82,020 $86,124 $90,432 $94,956 $99,708 $104,688 Annual $37.56 $39.43 $41.41 $43.48 $45.65 $47.94 $50.33 Hourly

0008 Office Specialist II CON 561 $4,019 $4,220 $4,431 $4,653 $4,886 $5,130 $5,386 Monthly (Confidential) $48,228 $50,640 $53,172 $55,836 $58,632 $61,560 $64,632 Annual $23.19 $24.35 $25.56 $26.84 $28.19 $29.60 $31.07 Hourly

0055 Payroll Coordinator CON 621 $5,977 $6,276 $6,590 $6,920 $7,266 $7,629 $8,010 Monthly $71,724 $75,312 $79,080 $83,040 $87,192 $91,548 $96,120 Annual $34.48 $36.21 $38.02 $39.92 $41.92 $44.01 $46.21 Hourly

0056 Payroll Supervisor CON 896 $7,870 $8,263 $8,676 $9,110 $9,566 $10,044 $10,546 Monthly $94,440 $99,156 $104,112 $109,320 $114,792 $120,528 $126,552 Annual $45.40 $47.67 $50.05 $52.56 $55.19 $57.95 $60.84 Hourly

0078 Principal Human CON 669 $7,182 $7,541 $7,918 $8,314 $8,730 $9,166 $9,624 Monthly Resources Analyst $86,184 $90,492 $95,016 $99,768 $104,760 $109,992 $115,488 Annual $41.43 $43.51 $45.68 $47.97 $50.37 $52.88 $55.52 Hourly

0170 Senior Accountant CON 622 $7,414 $7,785 $8,174 $8,583 $9,012 $9,463 $9,936 Monthly (Confidential) $88,968 $93,420 $98,088 $102,996 $108,144 $113,556 $119,232 Annual $42.77 $44.91 $47.16 $49.52 $51.99 $54.59 $57.32 Hourly

0054 Senior Budget Analyst CON 680 $7,913 $8,309 $8,724 $9,160 $9,618 $10,099 $10,604 Monthly (Confidential) $94,956 $99,708 $104,688 $109,920 $115,416 $121,188 $127,248 Annual $45.65 $47.94 $50.33 $52.85 $55.49 $58.26 $61.18 Hourly

0246 Senior Management CON 895 $6,835 $7,177 $7,536 $7,913 $8,309 $8,724 $9,160 Monthly Analyst (Confidential) $82,020 $86,124 $90,432 $94,956 $99,708 $104,688 $109,920 Annual $39.43 $41.41 $43.48 $45.65 $47.94 $50.33 $52.85 Hourly

0052 Senior Programmer CON 710 $9,340 $9,807 $10,297 $10,812 $11,353 $11,921 $12,517 Monthly Analyst (Confidential) $112,080 $117,684 $123,564 $129,744 $136,236 $143,052 $150,204 Annual $53.88 $56.58 $59.41 $62.38 $65.50 $68.78 $72.21 Hourly

2049
Attachment 5

0046 Systems & Programming CON 730 $10,322 $10,838 $11,380 $11,949 $12,546 $13,173 $13,832 Monthly Supervisor $123,864 $130,056 $136,560 $143,388 $150,552 $158,076 $165,984 Annual $59.55 $62.53 $65.65 $68.94 $72.38 $76.00 $79.80 Hourly

SECTION 3: Except as provided herein, all compensation, hours and other terms and conditions of employment presently enjoyed by Confidential employees shall remain in full force and effect unless changed subsequent to meetings between the City and representatives of the “Confidential” employees.

SECTION 4: The City of Costa Mesa has contracted with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) to prov ide retirement benefits to eligible City employees. Employees will contribute towards the employee and employer contribution as stipulated in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Costa Mes a City Employees Association.

A. Classic Members - Employees Subject to the 2.5% @ 55 formula:

These employees will pay the full CalPERS member contribution equal to eight percent (8%) of compensation earnable towards their CalPERS member contribution. As a result, the City pays and reports zero percent (0 %) of compensation earnable as an Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC) under Government Code section 20636(c)(4) pursuant to section 20691.

Classic member employees subject to the 2.5%@55 formula pay 2.469% of compensation earnable pursuant to Government Code section 20516(a) and

1.531% of compensation earnable pursuant to Government Code section 20516(f).

B. Classic Members - Employees Subject to the 2%@60 formula:

These employees will pay the full CalPERS member contribution equal to seven percent (7%) of compensation earnable towards their CalPERS member contribution. As a result, the City pays and reports zero percent (0 %) of compensation earnable as an Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC) under Government Code section 20636(c)(4) pursuant to section 20691.

Classic member employees subject to the 2%@60 formula pay five percent (5%) of compensation earnable pursuant to Government Code section 20516(f).

C. New Members - Employees Subject to the 2%@62 formula:

These employees are responsible for paying the employee contribution of one- half of the total normal cost of the plan (rounded to the nearest quarter of one- percent), as defined by CalPERS in their annual valuation, through a payroll deduction. This amount is determined by CalPERS each year. 2050
Attachment 5

New member employees will cost share (pursuant to Government Code section 20516(f)), a percentage of pensionable compensation that when combined with the payment of their employee/member contribution will equal twelve pe rcent (12%) of pensionable compensation.

SECTION 5: Amendments made pertaining to the fringe benefits, City Rules and Regulations and other employment conditions for employees represented by the Costa Mesa City Employees Association shall also apply to “Confidential” unrepresented employees unless specifically excluded. Any positions that may qualify to be part of this unrepresented unit shall be added as part of the process of adoption of salary schedules after consultation with the bargaining unit and employees.

SECTION 6. All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________ ______________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney 2051
Attachment 5

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the a bove and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2022-XX and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of November, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 15th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

(SEAL)

2052
Attachment 6

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,

CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE PAY RANGE S FOR CLASSIFICATION S IN THE

CONFIDENTIAL UNIT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- XX, revising the pay ranges for job classifications in the Confidential Unit , effective the pay period that includes pay date of January 6, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to repeal and replace Resolution No. 2022- XX to revise the pay ranges for the classifications specified herein; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

SECTION 2. The following positions of the Office of the City Manager, Finance Department and Information Technology Department, placed under the Confidential Unit Salary Schedule, are hereby revised to reflect the salary ranges and monthly rates of pay specified, effective the pay period that includes July 1, 2023. The monthly rate of pay may also be in increments between the monthly minimum and maximum pay step.

Class Class Title Salary Grade Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Code Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0171 Accountant CON 620 $6,943 $7,290 $7,654 $8,037 $8,439 $8,861 $9,304 Monthly (Confidential) $83,316 $87,480 $91,848 $96,444 $101,268 $106,332 $111,648 Annual $40.06 $42.06 $44.16 $46.37 $48.69 $51.12 $53.68 Hourly

0026 Administrative Assistant CON 593 $5,152 $5,410 $5,681 $5,965 $6,263 $6,576 $6,905 Monthly (Confidential) $61,824 $64,920 $68,172 $71,580 $75,156 $78,912 $82,860 Annual $29.72 $31.21 $32.78 $34.41 $36.13 $37.94 $39.84 Hourly

2053
Attachment 6

0018 Benefits Coordinator CON 592 $5,038 $5,290 $5,555 $5,833 $6,125 $6,431 $6,753 Monthly $60,456 $63,480 $66,660 $69,996 $73,500 $77,172 $81,036 Annual $29.07 $30.52 $32.05 $33.65 $35.34 $37.10 $38.96 Hourly

0063 Budget Analyst CON 679 $7,410 $7,780 $8,169 $8,577 $9,006 $9,456 $9,929 Monthly $88,920 $93,360 $98,028 $102,924 $108,072 $113,472 $119,148 Annual $42.75 $44.88 $47.13 $49.48 $51.96 $54.55 $57.28 Hourly

0809 Budget Specialist CON 891 $6,159 $6,467 $6,790 $7,130 $7,486 $7,860 $8,253 Monthly $73,908 $77,604 $81,480 $85,560 $89,832 $94,320 $99,036 Annual $35.53 $37.31 $39.17 $41.13 $43.19 $45.35 $47.61 Hourly

0040 Computer Operations/ CON 689 $8,692 $9,127 $9,583 $10,062 $10,565 $11,093 $11,648 Monthly Networking Supervisor $104,304 $109,524 $114,996 $120,744 $126,780 $133,116 $139,776 Annual $50.15 $52.66 $55.29 $58.05 $60.95 $64.00 $67.20 Hourly

0021 Deputy City Clerk CON 656 $5,888 $6,182 $6,491 $6,816 $7,157 $7,515 $7,891 Monthly $70,656 $74,184 $77,892 $81,792 $85,884 $90,180 $94,692 Annual $33.97 $35.67 $37.45 $39.32 $41.29 $43.36 $45.53 Hourly

0016 Executive Assistant to CON 648 $6,916 $7,262 $7,625 $8,006 $8,406 $8,826 $9,267 Monthly the City Manager $82,992 $87,144 $91,500 $96,072 $100,872 $105,912 $111,204 Annual $39.90 $41.90 $43.99 $46.19 $48.50 $50.92 $53.46 Hourly

0019 Executive Assistant CON 609 $5,669 $5,952 $6,250 $6,562 $6,890 $7,235 $7,597 Monthly (Confidential) $68,028 $71,424 $75,000 $78,744 $82,680 $86,820 $91,164 Annual $32.71 $34.34 $36.06 $37.86 $39.75 $41.74 $43.83 Hourly

0007 Human Resources CON 560 $4,140 $4,347 $4,564 $4,792 $5,032 $5,284 $5,548 Monthly Offices Specialist II $49,680 $52,164 $54,768 $57,504 $60,384 $63,408 $66,576 Annual $23.88 $25.08 $26.33 $27.65 $29.03 $30.48 $32.01 Hourly

0087 Human Resources CON 697 $8,505 $8,930 $9,377 $9,846 $10,338 $10,855 $11,398 Monthly Administrator $102,060 $107,160 $112,524 $118,152 $124,056 $130,260 $136,776 Annual $49.07 $51.52 $54.10 $56.80 $59.64 $62.63 $65.76 Hourly

0079
Human Resources
Analyst CON 659 $7,034 $7,386 $7,755 $8,143 $8,550 $8,978 $9,427 Monthly $84,408 $88,632 $93,060 $97,716 $102,600 $107,736 $113,124 Annual $40.58 $42.61 $44.74 $46.98 $49.33 $51.80 $54.39 Hourly

0017 Human Resources CON 590 $5,152 $5,410 $5,681 $5,965 $6,263 $6,576 $6,905 Monthly Assistant $61,824 $64,920 $68,172 $71,580 $75,156 $78,912 $82,860 Annual $29.72 $31.21 $32.78 $34.41 $36.13 $37.94 $39.84 Hourly

2054
Attachment 6

0072 Human Resources CON 627 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,656 $8,039 Monthly Technician $71,976 $75,576 $79,356 $83,328 $87,492 $91,872 $96,468 Annual $34.60 $36.33 $38.15 $40.06 $42.06 $44.17 $46.38 Hourly

0245 Management Aide CON 892 $5,831 $6,123 $6,429 $6,750 $7,088 $7,442 $7,814 Monthly (Confidential) $69,972 $73,476 $77,148 $81,000 $85,056 $89,304 $93,768 Annual $33.64 $35.33 $37.09 $38.94 $40.89 $42.93 $45.08 Hourly

0084 Management Analyst CON 872 $6,705 $7,040 $7,392 $7,762 $8,150 $8,558 $8,986 Monthly (Confidential) $80,460 $84,480 $88,704 $93,144 $97,800 $102,696 $107,832 Annual $38.68 $40.62 $42.65 $44.78 $47.02 $49.37 $51.84 Hourly

0008 Office Specialist II CON 561 $4,140 $4,347 $4,564 $4,792 $5,032 $5,284 $5,548 Monthly (Confidential) $49,680 $52,164 $54,768 $57,504 $60,384 $63,408 $66,576 Annual $23.88 $25.08 $26.33 $27.65 $29.03 $30.48 $32.01 Hourly

0055 Payroll Coordinator CON 621 $6,157 $6,465 $6,788 $7,127 $7,483 $7,857 $8,250 Monthly $73,884 $77,580 $81,456 $85,524 $89,796 $94,284 $99,000 Annual $35.52 $37.30 $39.16 $41.12 $43.17 $45.33 $47.60 Hourly

0056 Payroll Supervisor CON 896 $8,105 $8,510 $8,936 $9,383 $9,852 $10,345 $10,862 Monthly $97,260 $102,120 $107,232 $112,596 $118,224 $124,140 $130,344 Annual $46.76 $49.10 $51.55 $54.13 $56.84 $59.68 $62.67 Hourly

0078 Principal Human CON 669 $7,397 $7,767 $8,155 $8,563 $8,991 $9,441 $9,913 Monthly Resources Analyst $88,764 $93,204 $97,860 $102,756 $107,892 $113,292 $118,956 Annual $42.68 $44.81 $47.05 $49.40 $51.87 $54.47 $57.19 Hourly

0170 Senior Accountant CON 622 $7,637 $8,019 $8,420 $8,841 $9,283 $9,747 $10,234 Monthly (Confidential) $91,644 $96,228 $101,040 $106,092 $111,396 $116,964 $122,808 Annual $44.06 $46.26 $48.58 $51.01 $53.56 $56.23 $59.04 Hourly

0054 Senior Budget Analyst CON 680 $8,150 $8,558 $8,986 $9,435 $9,907 $10,402 $10,922 Monthly (Confidential) $97,800 $102,696 $107,832 $113,220 $118,884 $124,824 $131,064 Annual $47.02 $49.37 $51.84 $54.43 $57.16 $60.01 $63.01 Hourly

0246 Senior Management CON 895 $7,040 $7,392 $7,762 $8,150 $8,558 $8,986 $9,435 Monthly Analyst (Confidential) $84,480 $88,704 $93,144 $97,800 $102,696 $107,832 $113,220 Annual $40.62 $42.65 $44.78 $47.02 $49.37 $51.84 $54.43 Hourly

0052 Senior Programmer CON 710 $9,621 $10,102 $10,607 $11,137 $11,694 $12,279 $12,893 Monthly Analyst (Confidential) $115,452 $121,224 $127,284 $133,644 $140,328 $147,348 $154,716 Annual $55.51 $58.28 $61.19 $64.25 $67.47 $70.84 $74.38 Hourly

2055
Attachment 6

0046 Systems & Programming CON 730 $10,632 $11,164 $11,722 $12,308 $12,923 $13,569 $14,247 Monthly Supervisor $127,584 $133,968 $140,664 $147,696 $155,076 $162,828 $170,964 Annual $61.34 $64.41 $67.63 $71.01 $74.56 $78.28 $82.19 Hourly

SECTION 4: The City of Costa Mesa has contracted with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) to provide retirement benefits to eligible City employees. Employees will contribute towards the employee and employer contribution as stipulated in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Costa Mesa City Employees Association.

A. Classic Members - Employees Subject to the 2.5% @ 55 formula:

These employees will pay the full CalPERS member contribution equal to eight percent (8%) of compensation e arnable towards their CalPERS member contribution. As a result, the City pays and reports zero percent (0 %) of compensation earnable as an Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC) under Government Code section 20636(c)(4) pursuant to section 20691.

Effective the pay period that includes July 1, 2023, classic member employees subject to the 2.5%@55 formula shall have their cost sharing per Government Code section 20516(a) reduced by 1.469% for a net contribution of one percent (1%) and cost sharing pursuant to 20516(f) will be reduced from 1.531% to 0%.

B. Classic Members - Employees Subject to the 2%@60 formula:

Effective the pay period that includes July 1, 2023, cost sharing for employees subject to the 2%@60 formula will be reduced from five percent (5%) to two percent (2%) and will be pursuant to Government Code section 20516(a).

C. New Members - Employees Subject to the 2%@62 formula:

2056
Attachment 6

Effective the pay period that includes July 1, 2023, new member employees will cost share (pursuant to Government Code section 20516(f) , a percentage of pensionable compensation that when combined with the payment of their employee/member contribution will equal nine percent (9%) of pensionable compensation.

SECTION 6. All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________ ______________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney 2057
Attachment 6

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 15th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

(SEAL)

2058
Attachment 7

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,

CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE PAY RANGE S FOR CLASSIFICATION S IN THE

CONFIDENTIAL UNIT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to repeal and replace Resolution No. 2022- XX to revise the pay ranges for the classifications specified herein; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

SECTION 2. The following positions of the Office of the City Manager, Finance Department and Information Technology Department, placed under the Confidential Unit Salary Schedule, are hereby revised to reflect the salary ranges and monthly rates of pay specified, effective the pay period that includes July 1, 2024 . The mon thly rate of pay may also be in increments between the monthly minimum and maximum pay step.

Class Class Title Salary Grade Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Code Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0171 Accountant CON 620 $7,151 $7,509 $7,884 $8,278 $8,692 $9,127 $9,583 Monthly (Confidential) $85,812 $90,108 $94,608 $99,336 $104,304 $109,524 $114,996 Annual $41.26 $43.32 $45.48 $47.76 $50.15 $52.66 $55.29 Hourly

0026 Administrative Assistant CON 593 $5,306 $5,571 $5,850 $6,143 $6,450 $6,773 $7,112 Monthly (Confidential) $63,672 $66,852 $70,200 $73,716 $77,400 $81,276 $85,344 Annual $30.61 $32.14 $33.75 $35.44 $37.21 $39.08 $41.03 Hourly

0018 Benefits Coordinator CON 592 $5,191 $5,451 $5,724 $6,010 $6,310 $6,625 $6,956 Monthly 2059
Attachment 7

$62,292 $65,412 $68,688 $72,120 $75,720 $79,500 $83,472 Annual $29.95 $31.45 $33.02 $34.67 $36.40 $38.22 $40.13 Hourly

0063 Budget Analyst CON 679 $7,630 $8,012 $8,413 $8,834 $9,276 $9,740 $10,227 Monthly $91,560 $96,144 $100,956 $106,008 $111,312 $116,880 $122,724 Annual $44.02 $46.22 $48.54 $50.97 $53.52 $56.19 $59.00 Hourly

0809 Budget Specialist CON 891 $6,343 $6,660 $6,993 $7,343 $7,710 $8,096 $8,501 Monthly $76,116 $79,920 $83,916 $88,116 $92,520 $97,152 $102,012 Annual $36.59 $38.42 $40.34 $42.36 $44.48 $46.71 $49.04 Hourly

0040 Computer Operations/ CON 689 $8,952 $9,400 $9,870 $10,364 $10,882 $11,426 $11,997 Monthly Networking Supervisor $107,424 $112,800 $118,440 $124,368 $130,584 $137,112 $143,964 Annual $51.65 $54.23 $56.94 $59.79 $62.78 $65.92 $69.21 Hourly

0021 Deputy City Clerk CON 656 $6,066 $6,369 $6,687 $7,021 $7,372 $7,741 $8,128 Monthly $72,792 $76,428 $80,244 $84,252 $88,464 $92,892 $97,536 Annual $35.00 $36.74 $38.58 $40.51 $42.53 $44.66 $46.89 Hourly

0016 Executive Assistant to CON 648 $7,122 $7,478 $7,852 $8,245 $8,657 $9,090 $9,545 Monthly the City Manager $85,464 $89,736 $94,224 $98,940 $103,884 $109,080 $114,540 Annual $41.09 $43.14 $45.30 $47.57 $49.94 $52.44 $55.07 Hourly

0019 Executive Assistant CON 609 $5,838 $6,130 $6,437 $6,759 $7,097 $7,452 $7,825 Monthly (Confidential) $70,056 $73,560 $77,244 $81,108 $85,164 $89,424 $93,900 Annual $33.68 $35.37 $37.14 $38.99 $40.94 $42.99 $45.14 Hourly

0007 Human Resources CON 560 $4,264 $4,477 $4,701 $4,936 $5,183 $5,442 $5,714 Monthly Offices Specialist II $51,168 $53,724 $56,412 $59,232 $62,196 $65,304 $68,568 Annual $24.60 $25.83 $27.12 $28.48 $29.90 $31.40 $32.97 Hourly

0087 Human Resources CON 697 $8,761 $9,199 $9,659 $10,142 $10,649 $11,181 $11,740 Monthly Administrator $105,132 $110,388 $115,908 $121,704 $127,788 $134,172 $140,880 Annual $50.54 $53.07 $55.73 $58.51 $61.44 $64.51 $67.73 Hourly

0079
Human Resources
Analyst CON 659 $7,248 $7,610 $7,990 $8,389 $8,808 $9,248 $9,710 Monthly $86,976 $91,320 $95,880 $100,668 $105,696 $110,976 $116,520 Annual $41.82 $43.90 $46.10 $48.40 $50.82 $53.35 $56.02 Hourly

0017 Human Resources CON 590 $5,306 $5,571 $5,850 $6,143 $6,450 $6,773 $7,112 Monthly Assistant $63,672 $66,852 $70,200 $73,716 $77,400 $81,276 $85,344 Annual $30.61 $32.14 $33.75 $35.44 $37.21 $39.08 $41.03 Hourly

0072 Human Resources CON 627 $6,178 $6,487 $6,811 $7,152 $7,510 $7,886 $8,280 Monthly 2060
Attachment 7

Technician $74,136 $77,844 $81,732 $85,824 $90,120 $94,632 $99,360 Annual $35.64 $37.43 $39.29 $41.26 $43.33 $45.50 $47.77 Hourly

0245 Management Aide CON 892 $6,006 $6,306 $6,621 $6,952 $7,300 $7,665 $8,048 Monthly (Confidential) $72,072 $75,672 $79,452 $83,424 $87,600 $91,980 $96,576 Annual $34.65 $36.38 $38.20 $40.11 $42.12 $44.22 $46.43 Hourly

0084 Management Analyst CON 872 $6,906 $7,251 $7,614 $7,995 $8,395 $8,815 $9,256 Monthly (Confidential) $82,872 $87,012 $91,368 $95,940 $100,740 $105,780 $111,072 Annual $39.84 $41.83 $43.93 $46.13 $48.43 $50.86 $53.40 Hourly

0008 Office Specialist II CON 561 $4,264 $4,477 $4,701 $4,936 $5,183 $5,442 $5,714 Monthly (Confidential) $51,168 $53,724 $56,412 $59,232 $62,196 $65,304 $68,568 Annual $24.60 $25.83 $27.12 $28.48 $29.90 $31.40 $32.97 Hourly

0055 Payroll Coordinator CON 621 $6,341 $6,658 $6,991 $7,341 $7,708 $8,093 $8,498 Monthly $76,092 $79,896 $83,892 $88,092 $92,496 $97,116 $101,976 Annual $36.58 $38.41 $40.33 $42.35 $44.47 $46.69 $49.03 Hourly

0056 Payroll Supervisor CON 896 $8,350 $8,767 $9,205 $9,665 $10,148 $10,655 $11,188 Monthly $100,200 $105,204 $110,460 $115,980 $121,776 $127,860 $134,256 Annual $48.17 $50.58 $53.11 $55.76 $58.55 $61.47 $64.55 Hourly

0078 Principal Human CON 669 $7,619 $8,000 $8,400 $8,820 $9,261 $9,724 $10,210 Monthly Resources Analyst $91,428 $96,000 $100,800 $105,840 $111,132 $116,688 $122,520 Annual $43.96 $46.15 $48.46 $50.88 $53.43 $56.10 $58.90 Hourly

0170 Senior Accountant CON 622 $7,866 $8,259 $8,672 $9,106 $9,561 $10,039 $10,541 Monthly (Confidential) $94,392 $99,108 $104,064 $109,272 $114,732 $120,468 $126,492 Annual $45.38 $47.65 $50.03 $52.53 $55.16 $57.92 $60.81 Hourly

0054 Senior Budget Analyst CON 680 $8,394 $8,814 $9,255 $9,718 $10,204 $10,714 $11,250 Monthly (Confidential) $100,728 $105,768 $111,060 $116,616 $122,448 $128,568 $135,000 Annual $48.43 $50.85 $53.39 $56.07 $58.87 $61.81 $64.90 Hourly

0246 Senior Management CON 895 $7,250 $7,613 $7,994 $8,394 $8,814 $9,255 $9,718 Monthly Analyst (Confidential) $87,000 $91,356 $95,928 $100,728 $105,768 $111,060 $116,616 Annual $41.83 $43.92 $46.12 $48.43 $50.85 $53.39 $56.07 Hourly

0052 Senior Programmer CON 710 $9,910 $10,406 $10,926 $11,472 $12,046 $12,648 $13,280 Monthly Analyst (Confidential) $118,920 $124,872 $131,112 $137,664 $144,552 $151,776 $159,360 Annual $57.17 $60.03 $63.03 $66.18 $69.50 $72.97 $76.62 Hourly

0046 Systems & Programming CON 730 $10,950 $11,497 $12,072 $12,676 $13,310 $13,975 $14,674 Monthly 2061
Attachment 7

Supervisor $131,400 $137,964 $144,864 $152,112 $159,720 $167,700 $176,088 Annual $63.17 $66.33 $69.65 $73.13 $76.79 $80.63 $84.66 Hourly

SECTION 4: The City of Costa Mesa has contracted with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) to provide retirement benefits to eligible City employees. Employees will contribute towards the employee and employer contribution as stipulated in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Costa Mesa City Employees Association.

A. Classic Members - Employees Subject to the 2.5% @ 55 formula:

These employees will pay the full CalPERS member contribution equal to eight percent (8%) of compensation e arnable towards their CalPERS member contribution. As a result, the City pays and reports zero percent (0 %) of compensation earnable as an Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC) under Government Code section 20636(c)(4) pursuant to section 20691.

Classic member employees subject to the 2.5%@55 formula pay 1% of compensation earnable pursuant to Government Code section 20516(a).

B. Classic Members - Employees Subject to the 2%@60 formula:

Classic mem ber employees subject to the 2%@60 formula pay 2% of compensation earnable pursuant to Government Code section 20516(a).

C. New Members - Employees Subject to the 2%@62 formula:

New member employees will cost share (pursuant to Government Code section 20516(f), a percentage of pensionable compensation that when combined with 2062
Attachment 7

the payment of their employee/member contribution will equal nine percent (9%) of pensionable compensation.

SECTION 5: Amendments made pertaining to the fringe benefits, City Rules and Regulations and other employment conditions for employees represent ed by the Costa Mesa City Employees Association shall also apply to “Confidential” unrepresented employees unless specifically excluded. Any positions that may qualify to be part of this unrepresented unit shall be added as part of the process of adoption of salary schedules after consultation with the bargaining unit and employees.

SECTION 6. All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________ ______________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney 2063
Attachment 7

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2022-XX and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Cos ta Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of November, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 15th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

(SEAL)

2064
Attachment 8
2065
2066
2067
City of Costa Mesa
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 22-954 Meeting Date: 11/15/2022
TITLE:

ADOPTION OF THE SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF COSTA MESA (CITY) AND THE COSTA MESA POLICE ASSOCIATION (CMPA) AND THE ADOPTION OF

ACCOMPANYING SALARY RESOLUTION FOR CMPA
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE- HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION PRESENTED BY: KASAMA LEE, HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER
CONTACT INFORMATION: KASAMA LEE, HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER (714) 754-5169
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve and Adopt the Side Letter of Agreement between the City of Costa Mesa and CMPA (Attachment I);

2. Approve and Adopt Resolution Number 2022-XX revising the pay ranges for CMPA (Attachment II);

3. Approve the Fiscal Impact Analyses (Attachment III);

4. Authorize the City Manager and members of the City’sNegotiation Team to execute the Side Letter of Agreement documents, and amend the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Adopted Budget for the Police Department accordingly.

BACKGROUND:

In March 2020, the City was faced with significant and unprecedented workloads and financial challenges due to the emergence of the worldwide coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. In addition to the devastating impacts on public health and mortality, the impact of COVID-19 on the regional, national and global economy was also significant. As a result, numerous General Fund revenue sources declined significantly, including tax revenues (e.g., sales tax, hotel tax, and business license tax, etc.).

Three months after the pandemic was declared, at the June 25, 2020 City Council Meeting, a Side Letter Agreement with CMPA was approved to achieve a five percent (5%) salary furlough and budgetary savings. The Side Letter Agreement also included the following key provisions:
· Four (4) year contract extension to June 30, 2024
· 104 hour furlough (5% compensation reduction) in FY 2020-2021

Page 1 of 4 ends

Costa Mesa City CouncilNovember 15, 2022

Costa Mesa City Council
November 15, 2022