3A.3
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
-184-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 7
LU- 5.4 Require appropriate site and environmental analysis for future fire and police station site locations or for the relocation or closure of existing fire and police facilities. [2000 GP Policy LU-3A.4]
LU.5.5 Ensure that new development pays its fair share of impact fees such as park fees and traffic impact fees. This can also include impact fees related to community services (police protection services and fire emergency response services) or library facilities, once adopted and applicable. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
5.6 Promote development of revenue
-
generating land uses to help defray the costs of
high quality public services. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
5.7 Encourage new development that is organized around compact, walkable, mixed
-
use neighborhoods and districts to conserve open space resources, minimize infrastructure costs, and reduce reliance on the automobile. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
5.8 Include an evaluation of impacts on util ity systems and infrastructure in EIRs for all major general plan amendment, rezone, and development applications. [2000 GP Policy LU-
1D.1
]
LU-
5.9 Phase or restrict future development in the City to that which can be accommodated by infrastructure at the
time of completion of each phase of a multi-
phased project. [2000 GP Policy LU-
1D.2
]
LU-
5.10 Building densities/intensities for proposed new development projects shall not exceed the trip budget for applicable land use classifications, as identified in
the
Land Use Element. Building intensities for proposed new development projects shall not exceed the applicable floor area standards, except for the following conditions:
(a) Limited deviations from the graduated floor -area ratio standards for the commercial and industrial land use designations may be approved through a discretionary review process. No deviation shall exceed a 0.05 increase in the FAR in the moderate traffic category, and no deviation shall be allowed in the very low, low, and high traffi c categories.
Deviations from the FAR standards shall not cause the daily trip generation for the property to be exceeded when compared to the existing daily trip generation for the site without the proposed project or maximum allowable traffic generation for the Moderate Traffic FAR category, whichever is greater.
(b) Additions to existing nonconforming nonresidential developments may be allowed if the additions do not affect the overall traffic generation characteristics of the development and if the additions do not substantially affect the existing height and bulk of the development. Additions to nonresidential developments shall be limited to those land uses with traffic generation rates based on variables other than building area square footage. Examples of such additions inc lude, but are not limited to: 1) Hotels/motels: Increases in the size of hotel rooms or lobbies where no increase in the total number of rooms is proposed, and 2) theaters:
Increases to “back-stage” support areas or lobbies where no increase in the total number of seats is proposed.
(c) In the above conditions, the new development shall be compatible with surrounding land uses.
(d) Additional criteria for approving deviations from the FAR standards may be established by policy of the City Council. [2000 GP Policy LU-
1E.1
–
Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-185-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 8
LU- 5.11 Development plans shall be required for all phased development and approvals and shall be approved by the Planning and Transportation Services Divisions prior to the issuance of building permits. [2000 GP Policy LU-1E.2]
LU-
5.12 Development plans shall include an overall buildout plan, which can demonstrate the ability of the circulation system to support the proposed level of development. [2000 GP Policy LU-1E.3]
LU-
5.13 The City shall continue its annual preparation of the Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program. The annual review will specifically address major intersection operations in any mixed
-
use overlay area.
[2000 GP Policy LU-
1E.4]
Goal LU-6:
Economically Viable and Productive Land Uses that Increase the City’s Tax Base
[
2000 GP Goal
LU-1]
Objective LU-
6A
: Ensure the long
-
term productivity and viability of the community's
economic base. [2000 GP Objective
LU-
1B
]
LU-
6.1 Encourage a mixed of land uses that maintain and improve the City’s long
-
term
fiscal health. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.2 Continue to promote and support the vitality of commercial uses to meet the needs of local residents and that support region
al
-serving commercial centers.
[New
Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.3 Continue to prioritize commercial and industrial park use of properties north of I - 405 and within the Airport Industrial District. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.4 Support the cont inued presence of incubator businesses in the action sports industry and jobs -
producing businesses in the Westside.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.5 Encourage revitalization of existing, older commercial and industrial areas in the Westside with new mixed-
use development consisting of ownership housing stock
and live/work units. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.6 Continue to encourage and retain land uses that generate sustainable sales and property tax revenues, including regional commercial destinations and automobile dealerships. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.7 Encourage new and retain existing businesses that provide local shopping and services. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.8 Provide efficient and timely review of development pro
posals while maintaining
quality customer service standards for the business, development, and residential community. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.9 Support the retention and growth of Class A office tenants, including corporate headquarters for th
e action sports industry, biotech, and high technology
companies within the City. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-186-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 9
Objective LU- 6B : Encourage and facilitate activities that expand the City’s revenue base. [New Objective
for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
LU-
6.10 Encourage a broad range of business uses that provide employment at all income levels and that make a positive contribution to the City’s tax base. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.11 Provide opportunities for mixed
-
use, office, manufacturing, and retail development
that respond to market and community needs in terms of size, location, and cost. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.12 Track retail trends and tailor regulations to respond to market changes, maximize revenue, and maintain the appropriate the business mix. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.13 Encourage new development along major corridors that are pedestrian oriented and includes a mixture of retail/service, residential, and office uses. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.14 Improve ease and accessibility to information to capture opportunities for businesses to establish in Costa Mesa and bring high
-
skill and professional jobs
and new revenue sources into the community. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.15 Promote unique and specialized commercial and industrial districts within the City which allow for incubation of new or growing businesses and industries. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.16 Examine options for the development of new infrastructure for new technologies and businesses that use those technologies. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective LU-
6C
: Retain and expand the City’s diverse employment base, including office, retail/service, restaurants, high
-
tech, action sports, boutique and
prototype manufacturing, and industrial businesses. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.17 Engage in activities that promote Costa Mesa as a great place to live, work, and develop a business. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.18 Continue to work with surrounding cities to strengthen regional economic development. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
6.19 Provide flexibility and support for development of residential, office, small retail centers, and similar uses that would serve local residents and would also benefit from the high visibility along major corridors outside of significant commercial or industrial nodes. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal LU-7:
A Sound Local Sustainable Economy that Attracts Investment, Creates Educational Opportunities, and Generates Employment Opportunities [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
7.1 Endeavor to create mixture of employment opportunities for all economic levels of residents and businesses. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
7.2 Support linkages between local educational institutions
and local industries and
businesses. Foster training, collaboration with employers, and new innovative programs that increase job opportunities for residents and students attending school locally. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
7.3 Foster and provide u seful and efficient partnerships to implement economic opportunities with private, non
-
profit, or other public agencies.
[New Policy for
2015
-
2035 GP]
-187-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 10
LU-
7.4 Cultivate an entrepreneurial and academic environment that fosters innovation through non
-
tradit
ional housing developments, flexible office spaces, experiential development, and ensuring the diversity of retail/service throughout the urban districts. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
7.5 Support and provide flexibility for development projects and b
usinesses which
produce, care, and maintain material goods or fixed assets meant to support the production of market goods, especially for niche industries within the City of Costa Mesa. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
7.6 Seek out opportunities to attract primary businesses within stable industries and support industries that already exist within the City. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
7.7 Explore economic and employment opportunities to retain and strengthen the unique industry niches along Bristol and Paularino, in the Westside, on East 17th Street, and throughout North Costa Mesa. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
7.8 Support the development of pedestrian plazas and gathering places, and institutional spaces, as well as the more efficient use of existing spaces, to support economic growth and branding of existing industries within the City. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal LU-8:
Promote a range of multiple uses at the Fairview Developmental Center site
[New Goal for 2015
-
2035
GP]
LU-
8.1 In anticipation of the potential closure or repurposing of the Fairview Development Center site, the City will work with appropriate State agencies or private entity (if the property is sold) to plan for a complementary mix of low -
scale residential,
institutional, public facilities, open spaces, and recreational uses within a campus setting. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal LU-9:
Ensure that Fairgrounds uses are consistent with the General Plan designation
[New Goal for 2015
-
2035
GP]
LU-
9.1 Discourage changes in the allowable uses specified in the Fairgrounds General Plan land use designation for the Orange County Fair & Event Center property.
Ensure that amendments to this General Plan designation are approved by the electorate. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Goal LU- 10 :
Promote the growth of tourism [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective LU-
10A
: Promote structural improvements of visitor -
oriented land uses.
[New
Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
10.1 Engage with property owners, developers, and business owners to encourage the revitalization of the hotel/motels. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-188-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 11
LU- 10.2 Provide incentives to motel development projects seeking to improve existing motel facilities by increasing the hotel rating. These projects may include:
a. Updating building mechanical, electrical, or plumbing to comply with current building standards
b. Updating physical improvements to the site
c. Adding hotel amenities to the site
d. Updating or improving the landscaping on the site
e. Updating or improving the façade of the building(s) [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Objective LU-
10B
: Promote growth of visitor -
oriented land uses.
[New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
10.3 Motel and hotel land uses should be encouraged to be located near major transportation corridors and close to key tourist/visitor draws, other recreation venues, the airport, regional, and general local shopping centers. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
10.4 Consider the interest of quality of stay for visitors when evaluating projects near visitor-
oriented land uses by requiring on
-
site amenities and upscale guest
services. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Objective LU-
10C
: Promote uses and events that make visitor -
oriented business more
economically viable. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
10.5 Celebrate and promote the arts, culture, and industries of Costa Mesa through special events, civic gatherings, and City marketing and tourism promotion efforts. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
10.6 Promote the developmen
t of small
-
scale manufacturing uses or other uses that
generate multiple secondary and tertiary markets that support business travel tourism-
related uses.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
LU-
10.7 Maintain and enhance the City’s status and image as a centrall y located destination and cultural center in Orange County. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-189-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 12
Circulation Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address circulation are as follows:
Goal C‐1:
Implement “Complete Streets” Policies on Roadways in
Costa Mesa
Plan, develop, and implement a comprehensive transportation system that serves all users and modes of travel. [2000 GP Goal CIR
-
1 – Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
Objective C‐1A: Create a transportation network that meets the mobility needs of all Costa Mesa residents, businesses, and visitors. [2000 GP Objective
CIR
-
1A
–
Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.1: Update the City’s engineering standards for public and private streets to provide for safe, comfortable, and attractive access and travel for pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit users of all ages, abilities, and modes of travel. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.2: Allow for flexible use of public rights‐of‐way to accommodate all users of the street system while maintaining safety standards. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.3: Complete and annually maintain a needs assessment for traffic service levels and traffic safety. Develop and annually update a priority list of improvement projects, with priorities based on: 1) correcting
identified hazards; 2) accommodating
multimodal trips; 3) improving and/or maintaining peak ‐hour traffic volumes at critical intersections; 4) improving efficiency of existing infrastructure utilization; and 5) intergovernmental coordination. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
2C.2]
C‐1.4: Pursue downgrade of arterials that no longer have the demand requiring their buildout to planned capacity. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.5: Implement road diets on street segments with excess capacity to enhance bicycle and ped
estrian facilities.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.6: Encourage the conversion of excess on
‐
street parking spaces for expanded
sidewalk gathering places or landscaping. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.7: Encourage community participation in City processes and programs focused on improving mobility and transportation facilities. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.8: Pursue downgrade of 17th Street from 6
-
lane Major Arterial to 4
-
lane Primary
Arterial between Orange Ave and Tustin Avenue, through Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) Amendment process with the Orange County Transportation Authority. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective C‐1B: Preserve the character of our residential neighborhoods. [ 2000 GP Objective
CIR
-1A –
Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
C‐1.9: Implement traffic calming measures that discourage speeding and cut -
through
traffic on residential streets. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
1A.14
]
C‐1.10: Encourage non
-
motorized transportation in residential areas by pr
oviding
sidewalks and implementing bicycle friendly design of local streets. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.11: Reduce or eliminate intrusion of traffic related to non
-
residential development on
local streets in residential neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-190-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 13
C‐1.12: Prioritize intersection improvements which improve through traffic flow on Major, Primary, and Secondary Arterials, and reduce impacts on local neighborhood streets with emphasis on pedestrian safety. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
1A.14
]
C‐1.13: Promote engineering improvements such as physical measures constructed to lower speeds, improve safety, and otherwise reduce the impacts of motor vehicles. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.14: Design and Implement transportation projects to meet local and regional system capacity needs in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.15: Implement neighborhood approved traffic -
calming measures in residential
neighborhoods and appropriate commercia
l areas, such as street narrowing, curb
extensions, roundabouts, landscaped medians, and radar speed feedback signs. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.16: Establish priority ‐ranking system to evaluate traffic -
calming requests for
implementation throughou
t the City.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐1.17: Pursue programs that reduce vehicle speeds and cut ‐through traffic on local streets. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal C‐2:
Effectively Manage and Improve the Roadway System
Develop and maintain a robust and efficient vehicular circulation network. [2000 GP Goal CIR-
1 – Modified
for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
Objective C‐2A: Implement policies that encourage and accommodate all users while maintaining the efficiency of the circulation sy stem. [2000 GP Objective CIR
-1A –
Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
C‐2.1: Establish a citywide crosswalk policy to address installation, maintenance, removal, and enhancements of crosswalks at intersections and mid
‐
block
locations. Crosswalk locations and treatment will be based on criteria including, but not limited to safety, traffic volume, and concentration of pedestrian activity.
Potential enhancements may include leading pedestrian intervals at signalized intersections, bulb
‐
outs, and median refuges to reduce crossing distances. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐2.2: Avoid creation of frequent driveways for new development access in active pedestrian areas that create conflict points between pedestrians and vehicles. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐2.3: Encourage commercial property owners to use shared driveway access and interconnected roads within blocks, where feasible. Require driveway access closures or consolidations, or both when a site is remodeled or redeveloped. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
C‐2.4: Collaborate with law enforcement and public safety organizations to coordinate policies and programs that would reduce injuries and deaths on the roadways. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐2.5: Designate routes for truck traffic to minimize potential conflicts between trucks and cars, pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and vehicle access and circulation. Establish by ordinance a truck map that depicts allowable truck routes within the City. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-191-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 14
C‐2.6: Periodically review and update traffic signal timing at all signalized intersections to maintain traffic signal coordination and to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian needs. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐2.7: Develop new traffic level of services criteria in accordance with SB 743 to meet the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐2.8: Continue the use of the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology to address local traffic level of service and impacts, with Level of Service “D” as the threshold for meeting the City’s significance criteria.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Objective C‐2B: Construct street improvements and apply congestion management tools to obtain efficient performance of the transportation system. [2000 GP Objective
CIR
-1A –
Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
C‐2.9: Incorporate the street system improvements identified in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) into the Capital Improvement Program. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐2.10: Continue to deploy intelligent transportation systems (ITS) strategies —such as adaptive signal controls, fiber optic communication equipment, closed circuit television cameras, real‐time transit information, and real‐ time parking availability information
—
to reduce traffic delays, lower greenhouse gas emissions, improve travel times, and enhance safety for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐2.11: Investigate all operational measures, inc luding the use of one
‐
way streets, to
improve traffic circulation and to minimize congestion for all travel modes. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐2.12: Investigate and utilize state
‐
of‐the‐art transportation system management
technology and industry practices to address recurring and non
‐
recurring traffic
events (i.e., special events, incident/emergency management). [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐2.13: Continue to evaluate and pursue design and operational improvements (medians, driveway closures, signal synchronization or phasing, parking or turn restrictions, etc.) to improve the efficiency of intersections. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-2A.4]
Goal C‐3:
Enhance Regional Mobility and Coordination
Encourage development of a regional transportation network that addresses regional mobility needs for all modes of travel. [2000 GP Goal
CIR
-
1 – Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
Objective C‐3A: Promote development of transportation projects along regional corridors. [2000 GP Objective
CIR
-1A –
Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐3.1: Maintain compliance with Orange County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) requirements, including consistency with CMP level of service standards, adoption of a seven
‐
year capital improvement program, analysis of impacts of land use decisions on the CMP highway system, and adoption and implementation of deficiency plans when intersections do not meet adopted performance standards. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-192-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 15
C‐3.2: Support the goals and objectives of the Orange County Long Range Transportation Plan, including expansion of transportation system choices, improvement of transportation system performance, and sustainability of transportation infrastructure. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐3.3: Support the goals and objectives of the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), including expansion of transportation system choices, improvement of transportation system performance, and sustainability of transportati on infrastructure. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐3.4: Coordinate signal timing on all major arterials with a local signal synchronization program consistent with the Orange County Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan (TSSMP). [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
2A.2
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
C‐3.5: Ensure Costa Mesa’s input, participation, and discretionary review of applicable region‐wide transportation system policies, programs, and construction. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐3.6: Develop short -
term
and long
-
term improvements to the SR
-
55 corridor in
coordination with Caltrans and OCTA to address regional mobility needs. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐3.7: Promote the City’s preferred alternative of undergrounding the SR -
55 freeway
south of 19th Street within the City limits. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective C‐3B: Coordinate and partner with local and regional agencies to promote projects and polices that improve regional mobility. [2000 GP Objective CIR
-1A
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
C‐3.8: Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions to maintain or improve mobility within the City to achieve a standard Level of Service no worse than “D” at all intersections under State or joint control. Intersection Level of Service analyses for General Plan conditions for locations under State or joint control will be updated periodically and presented to the City Council. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
1A.12
]
C‐3.9: Consult with Caltrans and OCTA regarding the I‐405 widening project to minimize adverse impacts to Cos ta Mesa’s neighborhoods, businesses, and streets. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐3.10: Coordinate with OCTA and other jurisdictions to remove Gisler Avenue Bridge over the Santa Ana River from the City’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways and County’s Master Plan of Arterial Highways. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
1A.18
]
C‐3.11: Collaborate with Caltrans and neighboring jurisdiction to improve signal timing and coordination along major arterials across jurisdictional boundaries. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
2A.3
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐3.12: Work closely with the State of California and other government agencies to control traffic–related impacts of uses on State- or other agency-
owned land (i.e., Orange
County Fairgrounds, Orange Coast College, etc.). [2000 GP
Policy
CIR
-
1A.17
]
C‐3.13: Coordinate with other responsible agencies the planning, funding, prioritization, and implementation of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit programs and supporting infrastructure. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-193-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 16
Goal C‐4:
Promote Transportation Demand Management, Transit, and Efficiency
Utilize Transportation Demand Management strategies to manage demand and maximize available capacity. [2000 GP Goal CIR
-
2 – Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective C‐4A: Encourage greater uti lization of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies to reduce dependence on single
‐
occupancy vehicles.
[2000 GP Objective
CIR
-2A –
Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.1: Support South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) trip reduction programs, including park and ride lots, transit subsidies, carpool and vanpool programs, flexible working hours, bicycle facilities, and other traffic reduction strategies. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.2: Support local and multi‐jurisdictional car‐sharing and bike
‐
sharing programs. [New
Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.3: Consider implementing park ‐once approaches for multiuse districts and regional destinations areas. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.4: Embrace innovative parking solutions that reduce the required spaced needed for parking, such as automated parking lifts and elevators. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
C‐4.5: Encourage and provide incentives for commercial, office, and industrial development to provide preferred parking for carpools, vanpools, electric vehicles, and flex cars. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.6: Encourage and support programs that increase vehicle occupancy, including the provision of traveler information, shuttles, preferential parking for carpools/vanpools, transit pass subsidies, and other methods. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.7: Promote the combination of TDM measures as much more effective than any single measure. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.8: Require discussion of transportation system management (TSM) and TDM measures in all EIRs prepared for major projects. [2000 GP Policy Policy CIR- 2D.5]
C‐4.9: Encourage the integration of compatible land uses and housing into major development projects to reduce vehicle use. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
1A
.8]
C‐4.10: Allow the application of transportation management rideshare programs, integration of complementary land uses, and other methods to reduce project related average daily and peak hour vehicle trips to achieve consistency with allocated trip budgets. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
1A.10
]
Objective C‐4B: Promote regional and local transit services as an alternative to automobile travel. [2000 GP Objective
CIR
-
1A
– Modified for 2015
-
2035
GP]
C‐4.11: Ensure that roadways designated as transit routes can accommodate transit vehicle circulation and convenient pedestrian access to and from transit stops. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
1A.11
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.12: Review all capital improvement projects to ensure improvements located on existing and planned transit routes include modification of street, curb, and sidewalk configurations to allow for easier and more efficient transit operations and improved passenger access. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-194-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 17
C‐4.13: Provide transit stop amenities that facilitate access to and from transit stops and transfer locations. These may include pedestrian pathways approaching stops, high
-
quality benches and shelters, traveler information systems (real ‐time transit
arrival information), and bike storage and bicycle con
nections. Bus stops should
accommodate timed transfers between buses and other transit services where necessary. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.14: Encourage new development along major transit corridors to provide efficient and safe access to transit stops and public sidewalks. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.15: Support and participate with OCTA ACCESS Service in providing transportation assistance to senior citizens and the disabled. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.16: Consult with OCTA for transit services, such as changes to bus routes, bus stops, and hours of operation. Additionally, coordinate with OCTA for changes to transit services provided for seniors, the disabled, and transit dependent populations. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.17: Consult with the Newport ‐Mesa Unified School District to maintain school bus services provided for local schoolchildren. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.18: Coordinate with OCTA to improve transit services in the City, including strategies such as bus rapid transit, express services, community circulators, and other strategies. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.19: Encourage new local transit programs in coordination with OCTA, consisting of shuttle services to local and regional destinations. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐4.20: Coordinate with OCTA to construct bus turnouts at appropriate locations, with attractive shelters designed for safe and comfortable use. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
2B.1]
C‐4.21: Require discussion of transit service needs and site design amenities for transit ridership in EIR for major projects. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
2D.4
]
Goal C‐5:
Ensure Coordination between the Land Use and Circulation Systems
Facilitate close coordination between development of land use and circulation system.
[
2000 GP Goal
CIR
-
2 – Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
Objective C‐5A: Coordinate land use policies and development activities that support a sustainable transportation system. [ 2000 GP Objective CIR
-1A –
Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐5.1: Ensure that new development projects are consistent with the vehicular trip budgets, where adopted. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐5.2: Require that large developments and redevelop
ments provide short
‐term and
long
‐
term vehicular traffic impact studies. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐5.3: Encourage permitted General Plan land uses which generate high traffic volumes to be located near major transit and transportation corridors to m inimize vehicle use, congestion, and delay. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-1A.9]
C‐5.4: Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by phasing new developments to levels that can be accommodated by roadways existing or planned to exist at the time of completion of each phase of the project. [2000 GP Policy GM-1A.2 and Policy CIR-
1A.16
]
-195-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 18
C‐5.5: Promote development of mixed - use projects to reduce number of vehicle trips. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐5.6: Coordinate the design and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle ways in major residential, shopping and employment centers, parks, schools, other public facilities, public transportation facilities, and bicycle networks with adjacent cities. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-1A.3
]
C‐5.7: Require dedication of ri ght-
of
-way, in an equitable manner, for development that
increases the intensity of land use. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
1A.6
]
C‐5.8: Minimize circulation improvements that will necessitate the taking of private property on existing developed properties. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
1A.19
]
C‐5.9: Require that circulation necessary to provide or attain the minimum traffic level of service standard at an intersection to which a development project contributes measureable
traffic be completed within three years of issuance of the first building permit for such development project, unless additional right-
of
-
way or coordination
with other government agencies is required to complete the improvement.
Improvements may be requi red sooner if, because of extraordinary traffic generation characteristics of the project or extraordinary impacts to the surrounding circulation system, such improvements are necessary to prevent significant adverse impacts. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
2D.1
]
C‐5.10: Allow for construction of circulation improvements for a phased development project to be constructed commensurate with the project construction, based upon the findings of a traffic study approved by the City of Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Policy CIR
-
2D.2
]
C‐5.11: Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by phasing new development to levels that can be accommodated by roadways existing or planned to exist at the time of completion of each phase of the project. [2000 GP Policy GM-1A.2 and Policy CIR-
1A.16
]
C‐5.12: Support consistency with the Orange County Sustainable Communities Strategy (OC SCS) and SCAG RTP/SCS
by providing an integrated land use and
transportation plan to meet mandated emissions reduction targets consistent with SB 375. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective C‐5B: Establish strategies and processes that allow large developments to analyze and mitigate traffic impacts and infrastructure needs. [2000 GP Objective
CIR
-
2D
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
C‐5.13: Require that new development projects improve access to and accommodations for multimodal transportation. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐5.14: Require developers of new building and redevelopment/reuse projects as part of the project development review process that are located along bus routes to pay a designated fair share of the cost of providing improved bus stop facilities and related street furniture or, where appropriate, dedicate land for improved bus stop facilities. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐5.15: Consider the needs of the transportation and infrastructure system early for large developments and coordinate with developers to design projects that minimize traffic impacts and infrastructure demands, and implement complete streets wherever feasible. Alternatively, address transportation and infrastructure system impacts through the implementation of development agreements. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-196-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 19
Goal C‐6:
Fund and Evaluate the City’s Transportation Network
Explore opportunities to secure funding for enhancing the circulation system. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Objective C‐6A: Pursue funding sources to maintain and enhance the transportation and infrastructure system. [2000 GP Objective
CIR
-
2C
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐6.1: Evaluate traffic collision data regularly, and identify top collision locations for automobiles, bicycles, pedestrians, transit in Costa Mesa. Develop appropriate countermeasures and pursue funding from all available sources to implement them. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐6.2: Continue to develop and maintain long
‐
range capital improvement programs
consistent with the General Plan and M2 eligibility requirements. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐6.3: Coordinate with OCTA to fund, develop, and maintain a Master Plan of Streets and Highways consistent with the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐6.4: Require a locally collected and administered traffic mitigation fee program to guarantee that new development pays for its fair share toward improvements resulting in reductions in air pollutant and GHG emissions and traffic impacts generated by the development. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐6.5: Actively pursue local, State, and federal funding to implement, maintain, and evaluate the transportation and infrastructure system. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
C‐6.6: Supplement funding from annual fees or assessments on existing and new development with grants and other nonlocal sources. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
C‐6.7: Develop strategies to implement an infrastructure and transportation system to be consistent with State policies on resiliency and sustainability. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐6.8: Amend the General Plan, if necessary, to be responsive to evolving funding requirements and to comply with State and federal regulations affecting the goals and policies of the Circulation Element. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
C‐6.9: Coordinate with OCTA and Caltrans to seek funding and implementation solutions to improve Newport Boulevard at the terminus of the State Route 55 freeway to relieve congestion from regional traffic. [ 2000 GP Policy CIR-
2A.1 Modified for
2015
-
2035 GP
]
C‐6.10: Review the City’s transportation impact fee program on a regular basis, and adjust fees as needed to ensure that funding is available for planned transportation improvements that will benefit all travel modes. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐6.11: Prioritize funding and timing for implementing transportation improvements.
Consider prioritizing multimodal projects that provide the most benefit to all users. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐6.12: Require that every new development project pay its share of costs associated with the mitigation of project generated impacts. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-197-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 20
C‐6.13: Measure M2 sales tax revenues shall not be used to replace private funding which has been committed for any project. [2000 GP Policy GM-
1A.5
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐6.14: The City’s seven
-
year capital improvement program shall be adopted and
maintained in conformance with the provisions of Measure M2 for the purpose of maintaining the established level of service standard. [2000 GP Policy GM-
1A.6
–
Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐6.15: Maintain a traffic impact fee for circulation system improvements to the Master Plan of Streets and Highways; review and update fees on a regular basis. [2000 GP Policy GM-
1A.4
AND Policy CIR
-
2D.3
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
Objective C‐6B: Evaluate the transportation system to ensure that it meets the City’s circulation goals. [2000 GP Objective
CIR
-2A –
Modified for 2015
-
2035
GP]
C‐6.16: Provide an annual Capital Improvement Program General Plan consistency report. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
C‐6.17: Provide annual public review of implementation status reports of goals, policies, and objectives stated in the Circulation Element. [New Policy for 2015
-
20 35 GP]
C‐6.18: Adopt and seek out methods and processes that provide appropriate and accurate data for evaluating the performance of the transportation and infrastructure system. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal C-7:
Promote a Friendly Active Transportation System in Costa Mesa
Create a bicycle and pedestrian friendly environment throughout Costa Mesa for all types of users and all trip purposes in accordance with the five “Es:” Education, Encouragement, Enforcement, Engineering, and Evaluation. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
The following recommendations are aimed at providing the maximum flexibility in meeting the goals and policies in this Circulation Element.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Paths
Objective C-
7A
: Expand, enhance, and protect the existing bicycle and pedestrian network to provide a comprehensive, system of Class I, Class II, Class III, and Class IV facilities to increase connectivity between homes, jobs, schools transit, and recreational resources in Costa Mesa. [ New Objective
for
2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.1:
Develop an extensive bicycle and pedestrian backbone
network through the use of standard and appropriate
innovative treatments. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.2:
Plan and install new bicycle lanes on Major Arterials, where feasible and appropriate. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.3:
Plan and install shared lane markings (“sharrows”) and
signage on appropriate existing and planned bicycle routes where bicycle lane implementation is
demonstrated to be
infeasible. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.4:
Where feasible, Class I shared
-
use paths should be a
priority for future developments. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
-198-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 21
Recommendation C- 7.5: Plan and install new shared - use paths in utility corridors and/or along flood control channels, and extend existing bicycle and shared
-
use paths. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Recommendation C-
7.6:
Plan and complete north/south multi -
purpose and bicycle
routes through the City to augmen t the east/west route. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.7:
Consider the identification and feasibility of potential Class IV cycle tracks.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.8:
When feasible, implement the completion through regional coordination of the Costa Mesa roadway and trail segments of regional bikeway plans. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.9:
Encourage reallocation of roadway rights -
of
-
way where
appropriate to accommodate shared
-
use path and bicycle
facilities, while preserving and respecting the character of each adjacent neighborhood. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Recommendation C-
7.10:
Support bicycle improvement projects that close gaps in the regional bicycle network either by implementing spec ific projects recommended in the Plan or through other
treatments. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.11:
Encourage bicycle projects that connect local facilities and neighborhoods to major bicycle corridors. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.12:
Work cooperatively with adjoining jurisdictions and
local/regional agencies to coordinate bicycle planning, and implementation activities. Where required, develop
consistent active transportation plans and policies with regional and adjacent agencies. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Recommendation C-
7.13:
Prioritize safe access to major regional trails such as the OC Loop/Santa Ana River Trail and the Newport Back Bay
Trail System. Where feasible, plan and provide a
continuous low-stress Class I and/or Class IV facility from east to west across the city between these facilities. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.14:
Explore favorable opportunities to remove parking to
accommodate bicycle lanes. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Recommendation C-
7.15:
Identify favorable opportunities to retain parallel parking adjacent to sidewalks to maintain pedestrian safety.
[New
Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.16:
Consider every street in Costa Mesa as a street that cyclists could use. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.17:
Link on
-
road and off
-
road bicycle and pedestrian facilities
within Costa Mesa to existing and planned facilities in adjacent and regional jurisdictions. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-199-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 22
Recommendation C- 7.18: Low- stress design techniques should be considered where necessary to attract a wide variety of users. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.19:
Establish designated safe routes to schools for biking and walking. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.20:
Designate walkable districts in the City. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Bike and Pedestrian Facilities
Objective C-
7B
: Provide end
-
of
-
trip facilities that support the bicycle network.
[New
Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.21:
Provide bike parking and bike
-
related amenities at public
facilities and along public rights -
of
-
way.
[New Policy for
2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.22:
Pursue public -
private partnerships to furnish local
businesses with secure bike parking and other related
amenities. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.23:
Develop and adopt bicycle parking equipment standards for bicycle parking to be installed within the public right-of-
way
and post on the City website. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Recommendation C-
7.24:
Work with local schools and colleges to provide ample and secure bike parking and other related amenities for
students and employees.
[N
ew Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.25:
Work with OCTA to maximize bicycle amenities, such as
bus stop solar lighting and bicycle lockers, at high
-
volume
transit stops.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.26:
Prioritize the installation of bicycle-
scale and/or pedestrian
-
scale lighting. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.27:
Encourage and incentivize providing attended bicycle
parking services, such as a bicycle valet, at major City events, OC Fair, Farmers’ Markets, holiday festivals, and other community events. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.28:
Prioritize schools with the highest auto traffic volume during peak hours and insufficient parking for staff and parents.
Plan and install bicycle facilities adjacent those schools. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.29:
Provide bike parking and bike
-
related amenities at public
facilities and along public right -
of
-
way.
[New Policy for
2015
-
2035 GP]
-200-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 23
“First and Last Mile” Programs
Objective C-
7C
: Encourage sustainable modes of transportation to fill gaps between the first and last miles of trips (walking, biking, ride sharing, transit, taxi and car-
sharing).
[New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.30:
Identify citywide infrastructure needed to create the
interconnected multi -
trail system.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.31:
Improve the quality, aesthetics, and safety of high
-
use
pedestrian corridors. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.32:
Development and implement a bicycle sharing system.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.33:
Proposed new mode split goals:
• 50 percent motor vehicles
• 10 percent transit
• 10 percent bicycles
• 20 percent walking
• 10 percent carpools, taxi, transpo
rtation network
company services, and car sharing
[New Policy for
2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.34:
Establish a goal for all trips of less than three miles to be 30 percent by bicycle, and establish a goal of less than 1 mile to be 30 percent by walking. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
7.35:
Consider implementing a small-
scale transportation system
to encourage mode shift to popular destinations as defined by users. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal C-8:
Create a Safer Place
to Walk and Ride a Bicycle
Provide a safe, convenient, and attractive bicycling and pedestrian environment. Apply design standards, enforcement of traffic laws, maintenance practices, and safety awareness campaigns to encourage and increate the use of bi
cycle and pedestrian facilities.
[New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Design and Way-
finding
Objective C-
8A
: Develop bicycle and pedestrian facilities with approved uniform design standards, and implementation of way -
finding signage providing
information on various destinations. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.1:
Require that all facilities be designed in accordance with the latest federal, state, and local standards. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.2:
Provide and maintain bicycle and pedestrian signal
detectors, informational signage, and lighting, along City bikeways. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-201-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 24
Recommendation C- 8.3: Develop, install and maintain a bicycle and pedestrian way- finding signage program to indicate route t urns, the
presence of intersecting bikeways, streets and distances to nearby local and major destinations. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.4:
Develop a list of acceptable plant materials for shared use paths that will not damage, create s ecurity problems or hazards for bicyclists. Incorporate canopy trees and native, drought-
tolerant landscaping as a standard Class I facility
(shared use path) feature. Encourage the use of
sustainable drainage designs, such as bio
-
swales. [New
Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.5:
Utilize Complete Streets elements as demonstrated in most recent versions of National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Street Design
Guide and Bikeway Design Guide. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.6:
Crosswalks will include high visibility crossing treatments. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.7:
Paint direction arrows on all bike lanes and bike paths to reduce the risk of collisions. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Safety Enforcement and Reporting
Objective C-
8B
: Continue and expand enforcement activities that enhance safety of bicyclists on bike paths and roadways. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.8:
Enforce laws that reduce bicycle/pedestrian/motor vehicle incidents and conflicts. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.9:
Train police officers on bicyclists’ rights and responsibilities and bicycle/pedestrian/vehicle collision evaluation. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Recommendation C-
8.10:
Utilize the City’s bicycle -mounted patrol officer program to educate and enforce pedestrian and bicycle user violations not necessarily to punish, but to correct. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.11:
Promote efficient reporting mechanisms for behaviors that endanger cyclists and pedestrians. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.12:
Develop a partnership with the school community to
establish and update suggested routes to schools for biking and walking. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Safe Roadway Conditions
Objective C-
8C
: Maintain bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are clear of debris and provide safe conditions for all users. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.13:
Establish ro utine maintenance schedule/standards for
bicycle and pedestrian facilities such as sweeping, litter removal, landscaping, repainting of striping, signage, and signal actuation devices. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-202-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 25
Recommendation C- 8.14: Encourage and emp ower citizens to report maintenance issues that impact bicyclist and pedestrian safety including, but not limited to, potholes, sidewalk lifting, and overgrown vegetation. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.15:
Establish procedures for responding to citizen reports in a timely manner. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.16:
Where feasible, reduce or eliminate conflict points such as driveways that cross the sidewalk. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Safety Education
Objective C-
8D
: Increase education of bicycle and pedestrian safety through programs and training of school children and the public. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.17:
Create, fund, and implement bicycle
-
safety curricula and
provide t o the public, tourists, various ethnic groups, diverse ages and disadvantaged communities. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.18:
Provide multilingual bicycle
-
safety maps and brochures
(print and electronic versions) in languages that are wi dely used in Costa Mesa. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.19:
Encourage schools to develop and provide bicycle
-
safety
curricula for use in elementary, middle, and high schools, such as the Bicycle Rodeo events. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.20:
Support marketing and public awareness campaigns aimed
at improving bicycle and pedestrian safety. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.21:
Provide a user education program developed and promoted to encourage proper trail use and etiquette. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.22:
Work with local bicycle advocacy organizations to develop, promote and support a series of bicycle education classes.
Include information on bicycle safety, maintenance, and security. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.23:
Develop and distribute education material regarding bicycle and pedestrian responsibilities and laws. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Safety Data
Objective C-
8E
: Monitor and analyze bicycle and
pedestrian safety.
[New Objective for
2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.24:
Request bicycle and pedestrian collision reports from local law enforcement periodically and consider improvements to address problem areas. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-203-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 26
Recommendation C- 8.25: Establish an expedited process to report maintenance and safety concerns, e.g. pavement markings (sharrows,
missing bike lane lines), ramps, curb cut -
outs, broken
walk/bike signal buttons, signage, minor maintenance of bike lanes/paths (street/path sweeping, minor surface
patching, inoperable traffic signal bicycle detection). [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
8.26:
Conduct Roadside Safety Audits (RSAs) on a regular basis to provide periodic snapshots of roadway safety, including bicycle, pedestrian, equestrian, skateboard, and other non
-
motorized modes of travel. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal C-9:
Integrate Active Transportation Elements into
Circulation System and Land Use Planning
Provide bikeway and walkway facilities that are integrated with other transportation systems and land use planning decisions. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Land Use Planning Decisions and Active Transportation
Objective C-
9A
: Consider bicycle and pedestrian facilities during land use planning process. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.1:
Incorporate the Costa Mesa Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan into the City’s General Plan. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.2:
Ensure that all current and proposed land use planning is consistent with the Costa Mesa Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.3:
Require new developments provide adequat e bicycle
parking and pedestrian access. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Recommendation C-
9.4:
Collaborate with property owners to increase bicycle
parking over time. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.5:
Encourage the integration of compatible land uses and
housing into major development projects to reduce vehicle use. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.6:
Provide a fully integrated network of modern active
transportation facilities to and from major activity centers and reside
ntial centers.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.7:
Identify areas where an increase in the need for active transportation can reasonably be anticipated due to
housing/business growth. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.8:
Make commercial and recreational areas more enjoyable
for pedestrians by implementing measures such as
providing shade, planting trees, eliminating visible parking lots and vacant land, and minimizing long stretches of
building façade. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.9:
Develop creative, artistic, and functional bicycle parking solutions, and install them throughout the City as a
standard. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
-204-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 27
Active Transportation in Developments
Objective C-
9B
: Integrate bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements during planning, design and implementation of transportation projects. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.10:
Promote the preservation of bicycle access within all
roadway rights -
of
-
way, as well as the development of
innovative, safety -
enhanced on
-
street facilities, such as
bicycle boulevards and cycle tracks. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.11:
Establish bike boulevards on streets with low traffic
volumes and slow speeds to encourage bicycling. [New
Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.12:
Proactively seek new opportunities for acquisition of
abandoned rights -of-
way and other lands for the
development of new multi
-
use pathways that integrate with
the planned network. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.13:
Improve the safety of all road users through the
implementation of neighborhood traffic-
calming treatments.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.14 Detours through or around construction zone s should be designed for safety and convenience, and with adequate
signage for cyclists and pedestrians. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
9.15:
Provide opportunity for public input prior to the removal of an existing bicycle or pedestrian facility or the approval of any development or street improvement that would
preclude these planned facilities. [New Policy for 2015 - 2035 GP]
Goal C- 10 :
Promote an Active Transportation Culture
Develop educational and promotional programs to increase bicycle and pedestrian usage that respects and accommodates all users to foster a more balanced transportation system. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035
GP]
An Active Transportation Culture
Objective C-
10A
: Encourage more people to walk and bicycle by supporting programs that foster community support for bicycling and walking, and raise public awareness about active transportation. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Recommendation C-
10.1:
Support marketing and public awareness campaigns
through a variety of media aimed at promoting bicycling and walking as a safe, healthy, cost -effective, environmentally friendly transportation choice. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Recommendation C-
10.2:
Support programs aimed at increasing bicycle and walk
trips by providing incentives, recognition, or services that make bicycling and walking a more convenient
transportation mode. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-205-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 28
Recommendation C- 10.3: Promote bicycling and walking at City- sponsored and public events, such as Earth Day, Bike to Work Da
y/Month,
farmers’ markets, public health fairs, art walks, craft fairs, and civic events. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
10.4:
Encourage and promote bicycle related businesses within Costa Mesa including, but not limited to, involvement of civic clubs and organizations. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Recommendation C-
10.5:
Promote active transportation events in Costa Mesa to raise awareness and encourage bicycling, including, but not
limited to, those that may involve temporary road closur es, bike to work/school, senior walks, historic walks, and
ciclovías. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
10.6:
Encourage major employment centers and employers to
promote commuting by bicycle including the use of flex-
time
work schedules to support non
-
rush bicycle commuting.
Build a coalition with City, businesses, schools, and
residents to promote active transportation. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
10.7:
Encourage participation in bicycle and pedestrian
promotion activities by education facilities, arts programs, active transportation clubs, and entertainment providers. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
10.8:
Achieve “Silver Level Bicycle Friendly Community” by
League of American Bicyclists by 2025. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
10.9:
Achieve “Walk Friendly Community” status from
WalkFriendly.org by 2025. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
10.10:
Achieve “HEAL City” designation by 2017. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal C- 11 :
Promote the Positive Air Quality, Health, and Economic Benefits of Active Transportation
Encourage active transportation by promoting air quality, health, and economic benefits, and by pursuing multiple sources of funding for active transportation programs and facilities. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Improving the Environment with Active Transportation
Objective C-
11A
: Improve air quality and public health and reduce ambient noise by promoting Active Transportation programs. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Recommendation C-
11.1:
Determine baseline emissions levels, then track and
communicate changes in emissions as modes of
transportation trips shift to encourage more walking and biking. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
11.2:
Improve the quality of life in Costa Mesa by reducing
neighborhood traffic and noise. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
-206-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 29
Recommendation C- 11.3: Increase pedestrian and bicycle trips, thereby reducing vehicle trips and vehicle miles Traveled. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
11.4:
Coordinate with appropriate federal, state, and county
health agencies on active transportation programs to
achieve health benefits. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Economic and Other Incentives
Objective C-
11B
: Provide economic incentives for expanding and enhancing bicycle and pedestrian facilities. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
11.5:
Incentivize the business community to support pedestrians and bicycle users in tangible ways. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
11.6:
Partner with the business and school communities to create a marketing strategy to encourage individual businesses to market Costa Mesa as a bicycle
-
friendly City.
[New Policy
for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
11.7:
Encourage developers to include features, amenities and programs that are proven to increase walking and/or
bicycling. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
11.8:
Offer incentives for businesses whose employees walk or bike to work. [New Policy for 201
5-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
11.9:
Encourage the Chamber of Commerce and the business
community to promote active transportation in commercial areas to stimulate economic vitality. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal C- 12 :
Monitor, Evaluate, and Pursue Funding for Implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
.
[New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective C-
12A
:
Continuously monitor and evaluate Costa Mesa’s implementation progress on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan policies, programs, and projects. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
12.1:
Establish a monitoring program to measure the
effectiveness and benefits of the Costa Mesa Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
12.2:
Track cit ywide trends in active transportation through the use of Census data, bicycle and pedestrian counts, travel surveys, and online surveys as part of annual reviews of the General Plan. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
12.3:
Ensure that Bicycle
and Pedestrian Master Plan programs
and projects are implemented in an equitable manner
geographically, socioeconomically, and serving
disadvantaged communities. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
-207-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 30
Fund the Plans
Objective C-
12B
: Pursue grants and other sources of funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
12.4:
Strategize use of resources on developing effective and efficient grant application and program administration.
[New
Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
12.5:
Pursue multiple sources of funding and support efforts to maintain or increase federal, state and local funding for the implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-
12.6:
Consider designating a portion of development traffic
impact fees to fund bicycle and pedestrian facilities. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-208-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 31
Growth Management Elements
The goals, objectives, and policies that address growth management are as follows:
Goal GM-1:
Inter- jurisdictional Coordination [New Goal for 2015 - 2035 GP]
Objective GM- 1A : Coordinate land use and transportation planning policies with State, regional, and local growth management efforts. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
GM- 1.1: Cooperate with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and other jurisdictions on development, all future regional transportation plans, and lan
d use
planning on a countywide basis. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
GM- 1.2: Coordinate population, housing, and employment projections with the State Department of Finance, Southern California Association of Governments, Center for Demographic Research, Newport-Mesa Unified School District, and County of Orange agencies in terms of infrastructure planning. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
GM- 1.3: Work with inter - jurisdictional forums such as the City - County Coordinating Committee to make sure that the City's fees are consistent with minimally acceptable impact fees in the region. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
GM- 1.4: Participate in inter - jurisdictional planning forums to discuss implementation of traffic improvements, cooperative land use planning, and appropriate mitigation measures for developments with multijurisdictional
impacts.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
GM- 1.5: Continue to require that any new large developments prepare a master plan and environmental impact analysis. This allows the City to anticipate the impacts of large projects prior to development of any portion and permits more time to plan for public services and facilities needed to support the project. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal GM-2:
Integration of Land Use and Transportation Planning [ 2000 GP Goal GM-1 – Modified for 2015 - 2035 GP ]
Objective GM- 2A : Maintain the Level of Service standards by integration of land use and transportation planning
. [
2000 GP Objective GM-
1A
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
GM- 2.1: Ensure that land use designations are reflected in the sub - regional county model and SCAG’s model through consistent assumptions and methodologies.
[New
Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
GM- 2.2: Coordinate with State, county, and local agencies for planning and construction of public utilities to minimize negative impacts on the circulation system. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
GM- 2.3: Use the Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program to assess the impact of existing and new development on the circulation system. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
GM- 2.4: Support uses and development which create synergistic relationships with neighboring uses and development, especially those whose addition does not create mutually exclusive additional vehicular trips but adds to the value of the destination by any potential visitor. [New Policy for
2015
-
2035 GP]
GM- 2.5: Support creative and flexible solutions that provide for additional economic or physical growth within the City but does not place greater impact on the circulation system. These would include shared parking agreements, offset hours
of
operation, and clustering of harmonious and supportive uses. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-209-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 32
Housing Element
The goals and policies, from the adopted 20
21-
202
9 Housing Element, that address housing are as
follows:
Goal HOU-1:
Preserve and enhance
the City’s existing
housing supply. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element
]
HOU-
1.1:
Assist low and moderate
‐
income homeowners and renters through housing
assistance programs as long as funds are available. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
HOU-
1.2:
M inimize the displacement risk for existing residents when considering approval of future redevelopment and public projects. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
HOU-
1.3:
Prioritize enforcement of City regulations regarding derelict or abandoned vehicles, outdoor storage, substandard or illegal construction and establish regulations to abate blighted or substantially unmaintained properties, particularly when any of the above is deemed to constitute a health, safety, or fire hazard. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
HOU-
1.4:
Establish housing programs and code enforcement as a high priority and provide adequate funding and staffing to support those programs. [2021
-
2029 Housing
Element]
Goal HOU-2:
Facilitate the creation and availability of housing for residents at all income levels and for those with special housing needs.
HOU-
2.1:
Facilitate the development of housing that meets the needs of all segments of the population including affordable housing and households with specialized needs. [2021
-
2029 Housing Elemen
t]
HOU-
2.2:
Promote the use of State density bonus provisions to encourage the development of affordable housing for lower and moderate
‐
income households, as well as
senior housing through the dissemination of informational materials and discussions with project applicants. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
HOU-
2.3:
Monitor the implementation of the City’s ordinances, codes, policies, and procedures to ensure they comply with State requirements for “reasonable accommodation” for disabled persons and all fair ho
using laws.
[2021
-
2029
Housing Element]
HOU-
2.4:
Encourage housing programs and future actions that address the need for affordable housing options as well as the housing needs of Costa Mesa’s senior resident population and the large households population
.
[2021
-
2029 Housing
Element]
Goal HOU-3:
Identify adequate, suitable sites for residential use and development to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) at all income levels and promote a range of housing types to meet the needs of all segments of the Costa Mesa community. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
HOU-
3.1:
Encourage the conversion of existing marginal, underutilized, or vacant motels, commercial, and/or industrial land to residential, where feasible and consistent with environmental conditions that are suitable for new residential development. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
-210-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 33
HOU- 3.2: Encourage the development of well ‐ planned and designed residential or mixed ‐ use projects which, through vertical or horizontal integration, provide for
the
development of compatible residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or public uses within a single project, neighborhood, or geographic area within the City. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
HOU-
3.3:
Actively engage and partner with large employers, the Chamber of Commerce, and major commercial and industrial developers to identify and implement programs to balance employment growth with the ability to provide housing opportunities affordable to the incomes of the newly created job opportun
ities.
[2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
HOU-
3.4:
Consider the potential impact of new housing opportunities and their impacts on existing residential neighborhoods when reviewing development applications affecting residential properties. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
HOU-
3.5:
Encourage residential and mixed
‐
use development along transportation routes
and major commercial/mixed use corridors. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
Goal HOU-4:
Provide housing opportunities to residents of all social and economic segments of the community without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability/medical conditions, national origin or ancestry, marital status, age, household composition or size, source of income, or any other arbitrary factors. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
HOU-
4.1:
Support equal housing opportunities as expressed in Federal and State fair housing laws. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
HOU-
4.2:
Promote actions and programs that provide fair housing and counseling services and other housing assistance programs for all Costa Mesa residents in an effort to remove barriers and promote access to affordable housing in the City as funding is available. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
HOU-
4.3:
Encourage and support the construction, maintenance and preservation of residential developments which will meet the needs of families and individuals with specialized housing requirements, including those with developmental disabilities. [2021
-
2029 Housing Element]
-211-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 34
Conservation Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address conservation are as follows:
Goal CON-1:
Preserved and Restored Natural Coastal Habitat and Landforms
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide residents with a high
-
quality environment through the
conservation of resources, including land, water, wildlife, and vegetation; and the protection of areas of unique natural beauty.
[
2000 GP Goal
CON-1]
Objective CON-
1.A
: Evaluate existing biotic resources and preserve them in ecologically viable and natural conditions, where possible; and/or restore and integrate these resources into the urban environment, where feasible. [2000 GP Objective
CON-
1A
]
Habitat and Biological Resources Protection and Restoration
CON-
1.A.1:
Natural habitat is essential to ensuring biodiversity and protecting sensitive biological resources. Protect these areas and consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Orange County Water District, Orange County Parks, and other regional agencies to identify areas for special protection, and establish appropriate protection measures for these areas. [2000 GP Policy CON-
1A.1
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
1.A.2:
Contribute to regional biodiversity and the preservation of rare, unique, and sensitive biological resources by maintaining functional wildlife corridors and habitat linkages.
[
New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CON-
1.A.3:
Coordinate with the United States Fish
and Wildlife service, the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other regulatory agencies to mitigate project impacts affecting open and natural spaces. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
CON-
1.A.4:
Promote and protect native plant species within Fairview Park, and remove and control the spread of invasive species, including plants, animals, and fungi. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
1.A.5:
Ensure that all future development is reviewed with regard to protecting natural topography and bluffs to preserve and enhance Costa Mesa’s natural beauty. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
1.A.6:
Minimize soil depletion and erosion in development projects. Prevent erosion caused by construction activities, and encourage preservation of natural vegetation and
topography. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Access to Large
-
Scale Natural Areas
CON-
1.A.7:
Improve access to large -
scale natural areas in the City. These areas should
be open for controlled access to improve public enjoyment. Access should be limited where natural habitat is extremely sensitive. Work with transit agencies to improve connections and access to open space and recreation facilities from all Costa Mesa neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
1.A.8:
Require the provision of adequate visitor-
serving on
-
site parking facilities that
do no impact sensitive resources within the Coastal Zone. [2000 GP Policy CON-
1D.4
]
CON-
1.A.9:
Coordinate the development of plans, policies, and design standards for projects within the Coastal Zone with appropriate local, regional, and federal agencies. [2000 GP Policy CON-
1D.5
]
-212-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 35
Goal CON-2:
Conserved Natural Resources through Environmental Sustainability
Reduce the City’s carbon footprints and manage resources wisely to meet the needs of a growing population and economy. Base community planning decisions on sustainable practices that reduce environmental pollutants, conserve resources, and minimize waste. Encourage the design of energy - efficient buildings, use renewable energy, and promote alternative methods of transportation. [2000 GP Goal CON-
1]
Objective CON-
2.A
: Work to conserve energy resources in existing and new buildings, utilities, and infrastructure. [2000 GP Objective
CON-
1C
]
Energy Efficiency and Conservation
CON-
2.A.1:
Promote efficient use of energy and conservation of available resources in the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of public and private facilities, infrastructure, and equipment. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
2.A.2:
Consult with regional agencies and
utility companies to pursue energy
efficiency goals. Expand renewable energy strategies to reach zero net energy for both residential and commercial new construction. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
2.A.3:
Continue to develop partnerships with participating jurisdictions to promote energy efficiency, energy conservation, and renewable energy resource development by leveraging the abilities of local governments to strengthen and reinforce the capacity of energy efficiency efforts. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
2.A.4:
Encourage new development to take advantage of Costa Mesa’s optimal climate in the warming and cooling of buildings, including use of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Green Building Sustainable Development Practices
CON-
2.A.5:
Promote environmentally sustainable development principles for buildings, master planned communities, neighborhoods, and infrastructure. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
2.A.6:
Encourage construction
and building development practices that reduce
resource expenditures throughout the lifecycle of a structure. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
2.A.7:
Continue to require all City facilities and services to incorporate energy and resource conservation st andards and practices and require that new municipal facilities be built within the LEED Gold standards or equivalent. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
2.A.8:
Continue City green initiatives in purchases of equipment, and agreements that favor sustainabl
e products and practices.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Solid Waste Reduction and Recycling
CON-
2.A.9
Encourage waste management programs that promote waste reduction and recycling to minimize materials sent to landfills. Maintain robust programs encourage residents and businesses to reduce, reuse, recycle, and compost. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
2. A.10 Support waste management practices that provide recycling programs.
Promote organic recycling, landfill diversion, zero waste goals, proper -213-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 36
hazardous waste collections, composting, and the continuance of recycling centers. [2000 GP Policy CON-
1B.4
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CON-
2.A.11
Continue construction and demolition programs that require recycling and minimize waste in haul trips. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal CON-3:
Improved Water Supply and Quality
Pursue a multijurisdictional approach to protecting, maintaining, and improving water quality and the overall health of the watershed. A comprehensive, integrated approach will ensure compliance with federal and State standards, and will address a range of interconnected priorities, including water quality and runoff; stormwater capture, storage, and flood management techniques that focus on natural drainage; natural filtration and groundwater recharge through green infrastructure and habitat restoration; and water recycling and conservation. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective CON-
3.A
: Work towards the protection and conservation of existing and future water resources by recog
nizing water as a limited resource that requires
conservation. [2000 GP Objective
CON-
1B
]
Water Supply
CON-
3.A.1:
Continue to consult with local water districts and the Orange County Water District to ensure reliable, adequate, and high
-
quality sources of
water supply
at a reasonable cost. [2000 GP Policy CON-1B.3 – Modified for 2015
-
2035
GP]
Water Conservation
CON-
3.A.2:
Encourage residents, public facilities, businesses, and industry to minimize water consumption, especially during drought years.
[
2000
GP Policy CON-
1B.3 – Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CON-
3.A.3:
Restrict use of turf in new construction and landscape reinstallation that requires high irrigation demands, except for area parks and schools, and encourage the use of drought -
tolerant landscapi
ng. [2000 GP Policy 1A.2 –
Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Water Recycling
CON-
3.A.4:
Consult with local water districts and the Orange County Water District to advance water recycling program for new and existing developments, including the use of treated wastewater to irrigate parks, golf courses, roadway landscaping, and other intensive irrigation consumers. [ 2000 GP Policy CON-
1B.2
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Water Quality and Urban Runoff
CON-
3.A.5:
Work with public and private property owners to reduce stormwater runoff in urban areas to protect water quality in storm drainage channels, the Santa Ana River, and other local water courses that lead to the Pacific Ocean.
[New
Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
3.A.6:
Continue to develop strategies to promote stormwater management techniques and storm drain diversion programs that collectively and naturally filter urban runoff. [2000 GP Policy CON-
1E.5
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CON-
3.A.7:
Continue to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program (NPDES) by participating in the Countywide Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), which stipulates water quality requirements for minimizing urban runoff and discharge from new development and requires the provisions of applicable Best Management Practices (BMP). [ 2000 GP Policy CON-1A.3]
-214-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 37
CON-
3.A.8:
Require that all applicable development projects be reviewed with regards to requirements of both the on
-
site Water Quality Management Plan and
State
requirements for runoff and obtaining a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) permit. [2000 GP Policy CON-
1E.6
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
Municipal Sewer System
CON-
3.A.9:
Continue to consult with the Costa Mesa Sanitation District and the Orange County Sanitation District to modernize wastewater treatment facilities to avoid overflows of untreated sewage. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal CON-4:
Improved Air Quality
Take steps to improve and maintain air quality for the benefit of the health and vitality of residents and the local economy. In alignment with State emissions reduction goals and in cooperation with the South Coast Air Quality Management District, pursue regional collaboration to reduce emissions from all sources. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective CON-
4.A
: Pursue the prevention of the significant deterioration of local and regional air quality. [2000 GP Objective CON-
1E
]
Air Quality
CON-
4.A.1:
Support regional policies and efforts that improve air quality to protect human and environmental health, and minimize disproportionate impacts on sensitive population groups. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
4.A.2:
Encourage businesses, industries and residents to reduce the impact of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of stationary and non
-
stationary pollution
sources. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
4.A.3:
Require that sensitive uses such as schools, childcare centers, parks and playgrounds, housing, and community gathering places are protected from adverse impacts of emissions. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
4.A.4:
Continue to participate in regional planning efforts with the Southern California Association of Governments, nearby jurisdictions, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District to meet or exceed air quality standards.
[
2000
GP Policy CON-1E.1]
Climate Change
CON-
4.A.5:
Encourage compact development, infill development, and a mix of uses that are in proximity to transit, pedestrian, and bicycling infrastructures.
[New
Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
4.A.6:
Enhance bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support public bus service, pursuant to the Circulation Element’s goals, objectives, and policies.
[New
Policy for
2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
4.A.7:
Encourage installation of renewable energy devices for businesses and facilities and strive to reduce community
-
wide energy consumption.
[New
Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CON-
4.A.8:
Develop long
-
term, community
-
wide strategies and programs that work at the
local level to reduce greenhouse gases and Costa Mesa’s “carbon footprint”. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-215-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 38
Noise Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address noise are as follows:
Goal N-1:
Noise Hazards and Conditions
The City of Costa Mesa aims to protect residents, local workers, and property from injury, damage, or destruction from noise hazards and to work toward improved noise abatement.
[
2000 GP Goal
N-1]
Objective N-
1A
: Control noise levels within the City for the protection of residential areas, park areas, and other sensitive land uses from excessive and unhealthful noise. [2000 GP Objective
N-
1A
]
N-
1.1:
Enforce the maximum acceptable exterior noise levels for residential areas at 65 CNEL. [2000 GP Policy N-
1A.2
]
N-
1.2:
Give full consideration to the existing and projected noise environment when considering alterations to the City's circulation system and Master Plan of Highways. [2000 GP Policy N-1A.3]
N-
1.3:
Encourage Caltrans to construct noise attenuation barriers along I -
405, SR
-
55,
and SR -
73 where these freeways adjoin residential and other noise
-
sensitive
areas. [2000 GP Policy N-
1A.4
]
N-
1.4:
Ensure that appropriate site design measures are incorporated into residential developments, when required by an acoustical study, to obtain appropriate exterior and interior noise levels.
When necessary, require field testing at the time of project comp
letion to
demonstrate compliance. [2000 GP Policy N-1A.5]
N-
1.5:
Apply the standards contained in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations as applicable to the construction of all new dwelling units.
[
2000 GP Policy CON-
1C.2
and Policy N-
1A.6
]
N-1.6: Discourage sensitive land uses from locating within the 65 CNEL noise contour of John Wayne Airport. Should it be deemed by the City as appropriate and/or necessary for a sensitive land use to locate in the 65 CNEL noise contour, ensure that appropriate interior noise levels are met and that minimal outdoor activities are allowed. [2000 GP Policy N-1A.7]
N-
1.7:
Support alternative methods for the reduction of noise impacts at John Wayne Airport while continuing to maintain safety and existing limitations on aircraft daily departures. [2000 GP Policy N-1A.8]
N-
1.8:
Monitor the noise levels at OC Fair and Event Center and the Pacific Amphitheater, and continue to monitor the status of legally binding noise levels on the OC Fair and the Event Center and the Pacific Amphitheater. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
-216-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 39
Goal N-2:
Noise and Land Use Compatibility
Integrate the known impacts of excessive noise on aspects of land use planning and siting of residential and non
-
residential projects. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective N-
2A
: Plan for the reduction in noise impacts on sensitive receptors and land uses. [New Objective for 2015-
2035 GP]
N-
2.1:
Require the use of sound walls, berms, interior noise insulation, double
-
paned
windows, and other noise mitigation measures, as appropriate, in the design of new residential or other new noise sensitive land uses that are adjacent to arterials, freeways, or adjacent to industrial or commercial uses. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
N-
2.2:
Require, as a part of the environmental review process, that full consideration be given to the existing and projected noise environment. [2000 GP Policy N-
1A.1
]
N-
2.3:
Consider alternative noise level standards for mixed
-
use projects that take into
consideration the in
teraction of industrial operation noise impacts and the mixed
-
use developments planned for the Westside and SoBeca. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
N-
2.4:
Require that all proposed projects are compatible with adopted noise/land use compatibility criteria. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
N-
2.5:
Enforce applicable interior and exterior noise standards. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
N-
2.6:
Allow a higher exterior noise level standard for infill projects in existing residential areas adjacent to major arteri
als if it can be shown that there are no feasible
mechanisms to meet the exterior noise levels. The interior standard of 45 dBA CNEL shall be enforced for any new residential project. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
N-
2.7:
Encourage effective site planning in mixed
-
use areas that provides the optimal
distance between source of excessive sound and residents. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
N-
2.8:
Require new mixed
-
use developments to site loading areas, parking lots,
driveways, trash enclosures, mechanical equipment, and other noise sources away from the residential portion of the development and adjacent established residential development. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
N-
2.9:
Limit hours and/or require attenuation of commercial/entertainment operations adjacent to residential and other noise sensitive uses in order to minimize excessive noise to these receptors. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-217-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 40
Safety Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address safety are as
follows:
Goal S-1:
Risk Management of Natural and Human
-
Caused Disasters
Minimize the risk of injury, loss of life, property damage, and environmental degradation from seismic activity, geologic hazards, flooding, fire, and hazardous materials. Promote a sustainable approach to reduce impacts of natural disasters, such as flooding and fire. [2000 GP Goal SAF-1]
Objective S-
1A
: Work to mitigate and prevent potential adverse consequences of natural and human
-
caused disasters.
[2000 GP Objective
SAF-
1A
]
Geologic and Seismic Safety
S-
1.1:
Continue to incorporate geotechnical hazard data into future land use decision
-
making, site design, and construction standards. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1A.1]
S-
1.2:
Enforce standards, review criteria, and ensure
that structures on or adjacent to
bluffs are set back sufficiently to preserve the natural contours and aesthetic value of the bluff line and to provide sufficient access for fire protection. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1A.2]
S-
1.3:
Require geologic surveys of all new development located on or adjacent to bluffs. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1A.3]
S-
1.4:
Encourage retrofitting of structures —
particularly older buildings
—
to withstand
earthquake shaking and landslides consistent with State and historical building codes. [200
0 GP Policy
SAF-
1A.6
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
1.5:
Enforce applicable building codes relating to the seismic design of structures to reduce the potential for loss of life and property damage. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
S-
1.6:
Identify through a study the issue of unreinforced masonry buildings and soft stories and other structures not meeting earthquake standards in Costa Mesa.
Provide assistance if necessary to unreinforced masonry building owners once those buildings have been identified.
[
New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Liquefaction and Landslides
S-
1.7:
Continue to implement the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act, which requires sites within liquefaction hazard areas to be investigated for liquefaction susceptibility prior to building construction or human occupancy.
[
2000 GP Policy SAF-
1A.5
–
Modified for 2015
-2
035 GP]
S-
1.8:
Consider site soils conditions when reviewing projects in areas subject to liquefaction or slope instability. [2000 GP Policy SAF-
1A.4
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Localized Flooding
S-
1.9:
Continue to consult with appropriate local, State, and federal agencies to maintain the most current flood hazard and floodplain information; use the information as a basis for project review and to guide development in accordance with federal, State, and local standards. [2000 GP Policy SAF-
1A.8
– Modified for 2015
-
2035
GP]
-218-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 41
S- 1.10: Regularly review and update Article 10 - Floodway and Floodplain Districts of the City’s Municipal Code consistent with federal and State requirements. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
S-
1.11:
Improve and maintain local storm drainage infrastructure in a manner that reduces flood hazards. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
1.12:
Continue to develop hazard preparedness plans to prepare for large storms that could bring flooding hazards and other related issues. [2000 GP Policy SAF-
1A.8
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
S-
1.13:
Actively promote public education, research, and information dissemination on flooding hazards. [2000 GP Policy SAF-
1A.8
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
Tsunami and Sea Level Rise
S-
1.14:
Minimize flood hazard ri sks to people, property, and the environment by addressing potential damage tsunamis and sea level rise. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
1.15:
Consult with regional agencies and study strategies that employ engineering defensive methods along the Santa Ana River that limit potential flooding hazards from sea level rise. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Dam Inundation
S-
1.16:
Develop emergency response, early warning notification, and evacuation plans for areas that are within dam inundation areas, where feasible. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Aviation Safety and Protection
S-
1.17:
Utilize the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) as a planning resource for evaluation of land use compatibility and land use intensity in areas affected by airport operations. In particular, future land use decisions within the Safety/Runway Protection Zone will be evaluated in light of the risk to life a nd property associated with aircraft operations. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
1.18:
Comply with Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) and the John Wayne AELUP requirements relative to Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
1.19:
Use the Federal Aviation Regulations as a guideline to establish the ultimate height of structures as defined in FAR Part 77. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
1.20:
Minimize hazards to aeronautical operations by ensuring land uses do not emit excessive glare, light, steam, smoke, dust, or electronic interference in compliance with FAR regulations and the John Wayne AELUP. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-219-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 42
Goal S-2:
High Level of Police and Fire Services and Emergency Preparedness
Provide a high level of security in the community to prevent and reduce crime, and to minimize risks of fire to people, property, and the environment. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective S-
2A
: Plan, promote, and demonstrate a readiness to respond and reduce threats to life and property through traditional and innovative emergency services and programs. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Crime Prevention and Response
S-
2.1:
Promote crime prevention strategies and provide a high level of response to incidents. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
2.2:
Emphasize and prioritize crime prevention strategies, such as pedestrian
-
scale
lighting in targeted areas. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
2.3:
Timely response to incidents and monitoring areas with high crime rates should be part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce crime in the community. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Police and Fire Level of Service
S-
2.4:
Provide a high level of police and fire service in the community. Secure adequate facilities, equipment, and personn
el for police and fire.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
S-
2.5:
Consult with neighboring jurisdictions and partner agencies to respond appropriately to emergencies and incidents in all parts of the City. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
2.6:
Require that water supply systems for development are adequate to combat structural fires in terms of location and minimum required fire
-
flow pressures.
[New
Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
2.7:
Require development to contribute its fair share toward funding the provision of appropriate fire and emergency medical services as determined necessary to adequately serve the project. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Fire and Medical Servicers
S-
2.8:
Regularly update regulations that will protect the community from fire hazards. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
2.9:
Emphasize prevention and awareness of fire safety guidelines to minimize risk and potential damage to life, property, and the environment. In areas designated by the Costa Mesa Fire Department as having a high fire hazard, ensure adequate fire equipment, personnel, firebreaks, facilities, water, and access for a quick and efficient response in any area. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Emergency and Disaster Preparedness
S-
2.10:
Maintain staff and facilities that will continue to support a coordinated and effective response to emergencies and natural disasters throughout the City. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
2.11:
Consult with neighboring jurisdictions, local employers, and industries to ensure that emergency preparedness and disaster response programs equitably serve all parts of the City.
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-220-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 43
S- 2.12: Continue to maintain adequate police and fire staffing, facilities, equipment, and maintenance sufficient to protect the community. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Hazardous Materials Operations
S-
2.13:
Continue to consult with the County of Orange in the implementation of the Orange County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1B.1]
S-
2.14:
Ensure that appropriate in
-
depth environmental analysis is conducted for any
proposed hazardous waste materials treatment, transfer, and/or disposal facility. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1B.2]
S-
2.15:
Continue to consult with the County of Orange to identify and inventory all users of hazardous materials and all hazardous waste generators, and prepare clean
-
up
action plans for identified disposal sites. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1B.3]
S-
2.16:
Require the safe production, transportation, handling, use, and disposal of hazardous materials that may cause air, water, or soil contamination. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
S-
2.17:
Encourage best practices in hazardous waste management, and ensure consistency with City, County, and federal guidelines, standards, and requirements. [2000 GP Policy SAF-
1B.1
– Modified for 2015-
2035 GP
]
S-
2.18:
Consult with federal, State, and local agencies and law enforcement to prevent the illegal transportation and disposal of hazardous waste. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
-221-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 44
Community Design Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address community design are as follows:
PUBLIC REALM FOCUS
Goal CD-1:
Vehicular and Pedestrian Corridors
Strengthen the image of the City as experienced from sidewalks and roadways. [2000 GP Goal
CD
-1]
Objective CD-
1A
: Contribute to City beautification by enhancing the visual environment of Costa Mesa’s vehicular and pedestrian paths and corridors. [2000 GP Objective
CD
-
1A
]
CD
-
1.1 Implement the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines in all new streetscape corridor and parkway projects. Coordinate with new development adjacent to public rights-
of
-
ways to integrate landscape features
and design elements consistent with the streetscape standards and recommendations. [2000 GP Policy CD
-1A.1]
CD
-
1.2 Coordinate street furniture elements (benches, bus shelters, newspaper racks, trash receptacles, kiosks, etc.) whenever possible. Develop design standards and guidelines for the street furniture within and adjacent to public rights -
of
-
way to
complement the specific recommendations provided for streets in the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CD
-
1.3 Promote treatments for walls and fences and utility cabinets along public rights-of- way that contribute to an attractive street and sidewalk environment. Require that new walls and fences complement the style and character of the local district an
d
adjacent buildings. Newly constructed or reconstructed walls and fences adjacent to sidewalks and roadways should incorporate architectural treatments such as pilasters, masonry, or wrought iron, and should integrate tiered plantings to soften their appearance. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
1A.3
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CD
-
1.4 Promote a consistent landscape character along City streets to reinforce the unique qualities of each corridor and district, including the development of landscaped medians. Support implementation of the recommended street tree palette for each City street, as identified in the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines. [2000 GP Policy CD
-1A.4]
CD
-
1.5 Encourage electric and communication lines to be placed underground and electrical substations and telephone facilities to be screened to minimize visual impacts from sidewalks, streets, and adjacent properties. Support utility undergrounding through conditions of project approval, preparation of undergrounding plans, and the formation of assessment districts. [2000 GP Policy CD
-1A.5]
Objective CD-
1B
: Encourage clear connections between districts within the City. [2000 GP Objective
CD
-
1B
]
CD
-
1.6 Promote linkages between separate districts using bike trails, pedestrian paths, common medians or parkway landscaping, and other location-
appropriate physical
improvements. Through conditions of approval, public improvement projects, and other measures, support development of new connections and the enhancement of existing connections between districts. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal CD-2:
-222-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 45
Cohesive and Identifiable Districts
Enhance the existing character and strengthen the identity of Costa Mesa’s districts. [2000 GP Goal CD
-
2]
Objective CD-
2A
: Encourage future development and redevelopment to reinforce district scale, identity, and urban form. [2000 GP Objective
CD
-2]
CD
-
2.1 Consider urban design guidelines for each identified district in Costa Mesa that recognizes, maintains, and enhances the character and identity of each district; integrate existing specific plans’ policies and design guidelines as applicable. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
2.1 – Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CD
-
2.2 Support and seek land uses and development that correspond or enrich our existing districts. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal CD-3:
High Quality and Visually Interesting Nodes
Heighten the design quality and visual interest of nodes within Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Goal CD
-3]
Objective CD-
3A
: Create a sense of arrival to Costa Mesa, and develop prominent community focal points at key nodes within the City. [2000 GP Objective CD
-3]
CD
-
3.1 Introduce entry monument signs at key gateway locations, as identified in Figure CD
-
4. Utilize the standard design specifications for entry signs includ
ed in the City
of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
3.1 ]
CD
-
3.2 Reinforce a sense of arrival into the City by promoting architecturally significant development and significant landscape plantings at key nodes. Undertake a visioning process to develop specific design guidelines that articulate the desired character for each node within Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
3.2 ]
CD
-
3.3 Design and development of entry and internal wayfinding signage to be located through
out the City in areas that correspond to the existing nodes and districts. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal CD-4:
Identifiable and Protected City Landmarks. [2000 GP Goal CD-4]
Objective CD-
4A
: Promote the maintenance, use, and improvement of landmarks to enhance the visual image and identity of Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Objective CD
-4]
CD
-
4.1 Support efforts to introduce new monuments and landmarks, and preserve, maintain, and improve the condition of Costa Mesa landmarks. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
4.1 ]
-223-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 46
Goal CD-5:
Edges
Utilize Costa Mesa’s edges as opportunities to enhance the City’s image along its boundaries. [2000 GP Goal CD
-5]
Objective CD- 5A : Develop and implement programs that preserve and enhance City edges. [2000 GP Objective
CD
-5]
CD - 5.1 Preserve and optimize natural views and open spaces in Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
5.1 ]
CD
-
5.2 Control the visual impacts of new development on natural views of the coast and the wetlands. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
5.2 ]
CD
-
5.3 Develop open space corridors and trails along the edges of Costa Mesa where feasible and connect these trails to existing and potential future trails throughout the City.
[
2000 GP Policy CD
-
5.3 ]
CD
-
5.4 Continue to preserve natural open space, including restoration of the natural areas of Talbert Regional Park. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
5.4 ]
CD
-
5.5 Continue protection of Fairview Park as an open space and recreation area. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
5.5 ]
CD
-
5.6 Continue to work with Caltrans to improve the design quality of freeway edges. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
5.6 ]
PRIVATE PROPERTY FOCUS
Goal CD-6:
Image
Enhance opportunities for new development and redevelopment to contribute to a positive visual image for the City of Costa Mesa that is consistent with the district image. [2000 GP Goal
CD
-6]
Objective CD- 6A : Establish development policies and design guidelines that create an aesthetically pleasing and functional environment. [ 2000 GP Objective
CD
-6]
CD - 6.1 Encourage the inclusion of public art and attractive, functional architecture into new development that will have the effect of promoting Costa Mesa as the “City of the Arts”. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
6.1 – Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CD
-
6.2 Encourage the use of creative and well
-
designed signs that establish a distinctive
image for the City.
[
2000 GP Policy CD
-
6.2 – Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CD
-
6.3 Continue to work with Code Enforcement to ensure continued maintenance of properties and comp
liance with adopted development standards.
[2000 GP Policy
CD
-
6.3 ]
Goal CD-7:
Quality Residential
Promote and protect the unique identity of Costa Mesa’s residential neighborhoods. [2000 GP Goal CD -7]
Objective CD- 7A : Encourage excellence in architectural design. [2000 GP Objective CD - 7A]
CD - 7.1 Ensure that new and remodeled structures are designed in architectural styles that reflect the City’s eclectic quality, yet are compatible in scale and character with existing buildings and the natural surroundings within residential neighborhoods.
Continue to update and maintain the Costa Mesa Residential Guidelines. [ 2000 GP Policy CD
-
7.1 ]
-224-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 47
CD - 7.2 Preserve the character and scale of Costa Mesa’s established residential neighborhoods where possible; when new residential development is proposed, encourage that the new structures are consistent with the prevailing character of existing development in the immediate vicinity, and that new development does not have a substantial adverse impact on adjacent areas. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
7.2 ]
Objective CD-
7B
: Encourage the use of native plant palettes in the creation of landscaping plans used to establish a sense of place in neighborhood identification efforts.
[New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CD
-
7.3 Ensure that California native plants are used to support the local ecology and save water. Develop landscaping guidelines that reflect the local community. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal CD-8:
Quality Commercial Development
Achieve a high level of design quality for commercial development. [2000 GP Goal CD
-8]
Objective CD-
8A
: Encourage a high level of architectural and site design quality. [2000 GP Objective
CD
-
8A
]
CD
-
8.1 Require that new and remodeled commercial development be designed to reflect architectural diversity, yet be compatible with the scale and character of the district. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
8A.1
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CD
-
8.2 Use distinctive commercial architectural styles to reinforce a positive sense of place. Commercial architectural design elements and materials must be of high quality and style as well as suitable for long
-
term maintenance. Consistent
architectural design should be considered in choo sing materials, finishes, decorative details, color, accent features and include the following elements and materials appropriate for their context (see Table CD-
3: Elements and Materials):
[2000 GP Policy CD-
8A.2
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Table CD-3: Elements and Materials
Design Elements Design Materials
• Simple, multi-planed pitched roofs
• Open rafters/tails with large overhangs
• Appearance of “thick” walls
• Courtyards, arcades, and intimate spaces
• Tile details
• Deep
-
set window and door openings
• Offset wall planes
• Fountains and other unique details
• Building masses with the incorporation of
one and two story architecture
• Sequencing of enclosed space/arches
• Stucco, smooth, sand or light lace
finish
• Wood, as an exposed structural
material
• Clay or concrete roof tiles
• Native fieldstone
• Wood window casements
• Wood, as an accent material
• Brick, as an accent material
• Wrought iron (rust proof; anodized
aluminum)
• Tile, as an accent material
• Slumpstone garden walls
CD - 8.3 Encourage the use of entrance patios, courtyards, plazas, arcades, fountains, porches, tower elements, covered walks, and other features in commercial areas.
Promote pedestrian amenities. [2000 GP Policy CD-
8A.3]
-225-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 48
CD - 8.4 Ensure that common areas, walkways, driveways, and parking spaces be landscaped consistent with landscaping standards contained in the Planning, Zoning, and Development Code. Utilize landscaping to provide project amenities for new and remodeled commercial uses, and to screen parking and equipment areas. Landscaped areas generally should incorporate planting utilizing a three
-
tiered system: 1) grasses and ground covers, 2) shrubs and vines, and 3) trees. [2000 GP Policy CD
-8
A
.4
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CD
-
8.5 Ensure that site access, parking, and circulation for commercial uses are designed in a logical, safe manner. Parking should not dominate the site in areas adjacent to street, and should be well landscaped with a clear hierarchy of circulation.
Wherever possible, parking lots should be divided into a series of connected smaller lots utilizing walkways and raised landscape strips. Parking lots should also include landscaping that accents the importance of driveways from the street, frames the major circulation aisles, and highlights pedestrian pathways. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
8A.5
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CD
-
8.6 Require that areas for outside equipment, trash receptacles, storage, and loading areas be located in the least conspicuous part of the site. Utility and mechanical equipment (e.g. electric and gas met ers, electrical panels, and junction boxes) should be concealed from view from public streets, neighboring properties, and nearby higher buildings. Trash enclosures should be architecturally compatible with the project. Landscaping should be incorporated i nto the design of trash enclosures to deter graffiti. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
8A.6
– Modified for 2015
-
2035
GP]
CD
-
8.7 Encourage decorative paving treatments to be incorporated throughout commercial developments, including driveway entries, pedestrian walkways , plazas, and other areas. The design, materials, and colors of decorative paving treatments (e.g., stamped concrete, stone, brick or granite pavers, exposed aggregate, or colored concrete) should complement the architectural style of the primary buildings and make a positive contribution to the aesthetic and function of the site. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
8A.7
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CD
-
8.8 Require that exterior lighting on commercial properties be consistent with the architectural style of the commercial building. On each commercial site, all lighting fixtures should be from the same family of fixtures with respect to design, materials, color, fixture, and color of light. Lighting sources should be shielded, diffused or indirect to avoid spillover on adjacent properties, nighttime sky light pollution, and glare to pedestrians and motorists. To minimize the total number of freestanding light standards, wall-
mounted and pathway lights should be utilized to the greatest extent possible. [2000 GP Policy CD
-8A.8
]
Objective CD-
8B
: Preserve the scale and character of established neighborhoods near commercial uses. [2000 GP Objective
CD
-
8B
]
CD
-
8.9 Ensure that new commercial development utilize site planning and design features that optimize compatibility with adjacent residential neighborhoods. The following guidance should be considered:
• When adjacent residential and nonresidential uses can mutually benefit from connection, appropriate linkages (e.g., walkways, common landscape areas, and building orientation) are encouraged. Successful interaction between commercial and residential uses may be achieved through adequate setbacks, landscape buffers, screening, decorative masonry walls, berms, building orientation, and limitations of commercial activities. • Loading areas, access and circulation driveways, trash and storage areas, and rooftop equipment should be located as far as possible from adjacent residences.
• Building orientation and landscaping of commercial buildings should minimize direct lines of sight into adjacent residential private open space. [2000 GP Policy CD
-8B.1
]
-226-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 49
Goal CD-9:
Mixed Use
Promote development of mixed
-
use projects that seamlessly integrate multiple uses both functionally and aesthetically. [2000 GP Goal CD
-9]
Objective CD-
9A
: Design mixed use development projects to achieve a high quality character. [2000 GP Objective CD
-
9A
]
CD
-
9.1 Require that mixed
-
use development projects be designed to mitigate potential conflicts between uses. Consider noise, lighting, and security. [2000 GP Policy CD
-9A.1]
CD
-
9.2 Provide adequate parking, open space and recreational facilities to serve residents in mixed
-
use development projects. Design parking and other areas to acknowledge different users (residents versus shoppers) and to be compatible with the architectural character of the building(s). [2000 GP Policy CD
-9A.2]
Objective CD-
9B
: Provide for the development of projects that integrate housing with commercial uses and other compatible uses. [2000 GP Objective
CD
-
9B
]
CD
-
9.3 Encourage mixed-
use development along the east side of Newport Boulevard between Mesa Drive and Walnut Street. Establish incentives for the development of projects in planned development zones that integrate housing with retail and office uses. [2000 GP Policy CD-
9B
.1]
CD
-
9.4 Encourage the development of mixed
-
use urban villages along specified areas
of
West 17th Street, West 19th Street, and Superior Avenue that integrates residential with office, retail, business services, personal services, public spaces and uses, and other community amenities in a single building (vertical mixed
-
use
development) or in proximity on the same site
(horizontal mixed
-
use development).
[New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CD
-
9.5 Promote new types of urban housing that could be target -
marketed to people
seeking alternative housing choices in proximity to a major commercial area. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CD
-
9.6 Support efforts to mix compatible uses and activities. Encourage the siting of community-
oriented services, businesses, and amenities in and near mixed
-
use
neighborhoods, including schools, libraries, open space, and parks. [ 2000 GP Policy CD
-9B.2]
Goal CD- 10 :
Industrial and Business Parks
Promote quality design approaches for the redevelopment of existing industrial buildings, encourage the design to incorporate or provide flexibility for the needs of emerging types of industrial uses, and strive to match design with overall character of nodes, corridors, or districts if applicable.
[
2000 GP Goal CD-
10 –
Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective CD-
10A
: Require that industrial and business park projects meet high
-
quality
design standards. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
10A
]
-227-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 50
CD - 10.1 Require that industrial projects be designed to convey visual interest and a positive image. Architectural qualities and design elements encouraged for industrial uses are:
• Building modulation indentations and architectural details • Building entry accentuation
• Screening
of equipment and storage areas
• Landscaping to soften building exteriors and to serve as a buffer between uses [2000 GP Policy CD
-
10A.1
]
CD
-
10.2 Encourage that the design of industrial buildings considers the visual and physical relationship to adjacent
uses. An industrial structure which dominates its
surrounding environment by its relative size shall generally be discouraged. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
10A.2
]
CD
-
10.3 Encourage adaptive reuse of existing industrial structures which results in rehabilitated buildings with distinctive and attractive architecture. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CD
-
10.4 Promote the use of materials and colors that produce diversity and visual interest in industrial buildings. The use of various siding materials (i.e., masonry, concrete texturing, cement, or plaster) can produce effects of texture and relief that provide architectural interest. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
10A.3
]
CD
-
10.5 Require that landscaping be used to define areas such as entrances to industrial buildings and parking lots; define the edges of developments; provide transition between neighboring properties; and provide screening for outdoor storage, loading, and equipment areas. Landscaping should be in scale with adjacent buildings and be of an appropriate size at maturity to accomplish its intended purpose. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
10A.4
]
CD
-
10.6 Require that the design of lighting fixtures and their structural support be of a scale and architectural design compatible with on
-
site industrial buildings. Large areas
should be illuminated to minimize the visual impact and amount of spillover light onto surrounding projects. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
10A.5
]
Objective CD-
10B
: Ensure that the development of industrial projects are positive additions to the City’s community setting and do not result in adverse impacts with adjacent uses. [2000 GP Objective
CD
-
10B
]
CD
-
10.7 Require industrial projects to incorporate landscape setbacks, screening walls, and/or other elements that mitigate negative impacts with adjacent uses. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
10B.1
]
CD
-
10.8 Protect transitional areas between industrial and other uses. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CD
-
10.9 Storage yards, parking areas, and service areas should be screened from public view. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
10B.2
]
Goal CD- 11 :
Attractive Signs that Reflect Costa Mesa
Ensure that signs contribute positively to Costa Mesa’s image and overall economic development. [2000 GP Goal CD
-
13 ]
-228-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 51
Objective CD- 11A : Facilitate the installation of signs that contribute to a positive image of the public realm. [2000 GP Objective
CD
-
13 ]
CD
-
11.1 Encourage homeowners' associations and neighborhoods to maintain housing tract entrance signs in an attractive condition, and encourage the placement of such signs at the entrance of major developments which do not have such identification. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
13.1 ]
CD
-
11.2 Encourage the use of common design elements in signs for commercial and industrial centers through the development of planned sign programs to improve center identity by publicizing the benefits of such programs to developers and local business operators. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
13.2 ]
CD
-
11.3 Encourage citywide sign design guidelines that promote creativity and flexibility while upholding design quality. Design guidelines could include the
design and
placement of business signs, public street graphics, street signs, locational and directional signs, traffic signs, etc. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
CD
-
11.4 Introduce distinctive entry signage within the Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines which effectively announces arrival to unique districts and neighborhoods.
[
2000 GP Policy CD
-
13.3 – Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
CD
-
11.5 Develop and design signage that helps with way -
finding throughout the City so
visitors and residents can easily access destination locations and identify landmarks. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Goal CD- 12 :
Public Safety through Design
Use design approaches to enhance public safety.
[
2000 GP Goal
CD
-
14 – Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
Objective CD-
12A
: Incorporate public safety considerations into community design. [ 2000 GP Objective CD
-
14 ]
CD
-
12.1 Decrease the opportunity for criminal activity by addressing high
-
risk
circumstances (e.g., dark alleys, enclosed stairwells, and dark entrances). Involve the Police and Fire Departments in reviewing and making design recommendations during the project review process. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
14.1 ]
CD
-
12.2 Continue to implement and refine development standards and/or guidelines based on Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) for new
development and redevelopment with emphasis on site and building design to minimize vulnerability to criminal activity. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
14.2 ]
CD
-
12.3 Continue to provide CPTED training to City staff and local planni ng and design professionals to optimize public safety through community design. [2000 GP Policy CD
-
14.3 ]
-229-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 52
Open Space and Recreation Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address open space and recreation are as follows:
Goal OSR-1:
Balanced and Accessible System of Parks and Open Spaces
Provide a high
-
quality environment through the development of recreation resources and preservation of open space that meets community needs in Costa Mesa.
[
2000 GP Goal OSR-1]
Objective OSR-
1A
: Maintain and preserve existing parks, and strive to provide additional parks, public spaces, and recreation facilities that meet the community’s evolving needs. [2000 GP Objective
OSR-
1A
]
Adequate Neighborhood and Community Park Recreational Facilities
OSR-
1.1:
Maintain a system of Neighborhood and Community Parks that provide a variety of active and passive recreational opportunities throughout the City. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
1.2:
Provide parks and recreation facilities appropriate for the
individual neighborhoods
in which they are located and reflective of the needs and interests of the population they serve. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Acquisition of New Parkland
OSR-
1.3:
Pursue the acquisition and development of pocket and neighborh
ood parks within
park-
deficient areas, as identified in Figure OSR
-
3: Planning Areas and
Underserved Park Areas. [2000 GP Policy OSR-
1A.3
– Modified for 2105
-
2035
GP]
OSR-
1.4:
Prioritize the acquisition of land for parks in underserved neighborhoods. [2000 GP Policy OSR-
1A.14
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
OSR-
1.5:
Maximize public space by requiring plazas and public gathering spaces in private developments that can serve multiple uses, including recreation and social needs. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
1.6:
Provide maximum visibility and accessibility for future public parks by locating facilities in close proximity to public streets. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.2]
OSR-
1.7:
Adjust and update development fee programs to accumulate funds for the acquisition and improvement of parks and recreation facilities commensurate with identified need and population growth. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Balance of Passive and Active Recreation
OSR-
1.8:
Require that parks and recreation facilities reflect new trends and population changes, and are developed with facilities appropriate to all ages, including athletic fields, active play areas, passive open space, tot lots, and picnic areas. [2000 GP Policy OSR-
1A.15
]
OSR-
1.9:
Conduct a sports facility study to review current outdoor facility locations and resources and a demographic study for future facility requirements as they relate to planned growth within the City. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
1.10:
Pursue additional community garden lots and spaces to
meet demand and need
by the community. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-230-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 53
Park Maintenance and Retrofit
OSR-
1.11:
Perform regular maintenance of facilities to ensure proper working order of all recreation facilities and equipment. [New Policy for
2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
1.12:
Retrofit parks and recreation facilities to provide disability access as required by law. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
1.13:
Design and reform parks to reflect the latest recreational features that respond to demographic changes and community needs. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
1.14:
Consult with law enforcement agencies, surrounding cities, community policing groups, and OC Parks to create a safe and healthy environment at Talbert Regional Park, Fairview Park, and along the Santa Ana River.
[New Policy for
2015
-
2035 GP]
Long-
Term Pla
nning of Institutional Uses
OSR-
1.15:
Continue to pursue opportunities to create joint -
use community space at facilities
owned by private organizations such as private schools, faith
-
based groups,
service clubs, and hospitals. [2000 GP Policy OSR-
1A.10
]
OSR-
1.16:
Continue to coordinate with the Newport -
Mesa Unified School District to
supplement City park facilities through joint -
use agreements.
[ 2000 GP Policy
OSR-
1A.10
]
OSR-
1.17:
Consult with Orange County Fairgrounds in implementing OC Fair & Event Center Master Plan. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Level of Service and Access
OSR-
1.18:
Provide a minimum of 4.26 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.1]
OSR-
1.19:
Update the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan every 10 years, as feasible. [2000 GP Policy OSR-
1A.15
]
OSR-
1.20:
Enhance pedestrian, bicycle, and transit linkages to meet the needs of residents and to provide better access to parks, recreation, and public spaces. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
1.21:
P
rovide opportunities for public access to all open space areas, except where sensitive resources may be threatened or damaged, public health and safety may be compromised, or access would interfere with the managed production of resources. [New Policy for
2015
-
2035 GP]
GOAL OSR-2:
Community Services Programs Meeting Community Needs
Enhancing the community through the delivery of innovative recreational programs, quality parks and facilities and services that promote social, physical, and emotional well-
being. High
-
quality community
services programs demonstrate the City’s commitment to providing opportunities for recreational, physical, and educational activities for residents of all ages. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective OSR-
2A
:
Provide activities, classes, and a variety of programs to meet the year - round recreational needs of all residents: children, adult, seniors, and persons with special needs. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-231-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 54
High- quality Community Services
OSR-
2.1:
Prov ide high
-
quality community services programs that are flexible and responsive to the community’s changing needs. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
2.2:
Plan and conduct citywide special events that bring residents together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote economic development. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
2.3:
Continue to consult with nonprofit sports organizations and recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational programs that complement and supplement those offered by the City. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
2.4:
Update existing facilities for senior citizens, youth, adults, and overall community use. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Community Services to Support Community Needs
OSR-
2.5:
Monitor and research the ever -
changing community services needs of the
community, and develop action plans to address those needs through partnerships with service agencies. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
2.6:
Continue to provide rental opportunities at commu
nity facilities and parks for
residents, nonprofit groups, and businesses to meet their recreational and professional needs. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
2.7:
Continue broad
-
based public outreach activities that inform residents of all available community services programs, and obtain input from the community regarding program and service needs. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
2.8:
Encourage resident input and utilize demographic data, partnerships, volunteers, and existing resources to identify the needs of community. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
2.9:
Identify innovative funding and development opportunities to support and sustain a responsive community services network. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
2.10:
Continue and expand the development of community partnerships to offer both standard and innovative services to meet residents’ needs. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
2.11:
Develop and implement community services programs and activities that meet the needs of specialized populations through the development of community partnerships. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
2.12:
Provide support for volunteer groups that conduct special activities open to the entire community. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
GOAL OSR-3:
Conserved Open Space
Costa Mesa is committed to open space conservation to ensure that the network of parklands, trails, hillsides, and undeveloped natural areas remain viable for supporting biological communities and providing sanctuary for future generations. This commitment includes expanding public access to open space, where appropriate, and acquiring additional lands where feasible. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective OSR-
3A
:
Preserve the City’s open space lands and provide additional community and neighborhood parkland in underserved areas. [New Objective for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-232-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 55
Open Space Preservation and Stewardship
OSR-
3.1:
Preserve open space areas along The Santa Ana River, large open space parks, and along the mesa formations to protect natural
habitat and to maintain the
integrity of the natural environment. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
3.2:
Encourage the preservation of coastal views from City and County parkland and public streets within Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Policy OSR-
1A.13
]
OSR-
3.3:
Identify current open space areas for protection, management, and potential enhancement to maintain and, if possible, increase its value as wildlife habitat. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Management and Maintenance of Open Space
OSR-
3.4:
Encourage the long
-
term maintenance and management of open space lands
through open space easements, development rights transfers or acquisition, zoning regulations, and other incentives. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.6]
OSR-
3.5:
Encourage the greening and beautifying of the Santa Ana River. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
3.6:
Encourage opportunities for recreation, history, education, interpretive materials, and art associated with the Santa Ana River open spaces. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
3.7:
P
romote water quality strategies to improve water quality along the Santa Ana River. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Coordination and Organization Development
OSR-
3.8:
Consult with State and regional agencies and the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), regarding open space planning efforts. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
3.9:
Consult with the Orange Coast River Park, Inc. and surrounding cities and other government agencies in maintaining and rehabilitating open space lands along the
Santa Ana River. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
3.10:
Consult with OC Parks over the enhancements and management of Talbert Regional Park without adversely impacting surrounding residential neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
GOAL OSR-4:
Extensive Arts and Culture Programs and Services
Provide comprehensive and multifaceted arts and culture programs and services that provide education and entertainment to the community and a broader audience. [New Goal for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Objective OSR-
4A
: Support performing and visual arts programs, facilities, and activities that stimulate the minds and intellectual thinking of community members to increase awareness of the City’s motto, “The City of the Arts.” [ New Objective
for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Cultural Arts Venues
OSR-
4.1:
Continue to support the mission of the Segerstrom Center for the Arts and associate venues and facilities. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
4.2:
Support the development and operations of an arts museum at the Segerstrom Center for the Arts. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-233-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 56
OSR-
4.3:
Encourage additional indoor and outdoor facility spaces citywide to display public art and host arts and culture special events. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Leader in the Arts
OSR-
4.4:
Expand the City's role as a supporter of the arts. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
4.5:
Encourage financial support of the arts by supporting non
-
profit groups and
foundations. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
4.6:
Consider preparation of an arts and culture master plan for the City. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
4.7:
Consult with local agencies and surrounding cities to address the creation and implementation of arts-
friendly policies.
[New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
OSR-
4.8:
Enhance Costa Mesa’s position as a leader in the arts in Southern California and its recognition nationally as a city devoted to arts institutions of superior quality. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
4.9:
Engage community members in arts activities, and utilize the art s to provide educational and cultural awareness opportunities. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
4.10:
Continue the City’s commitment to its arts in cooperation with the private sector. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
4.11:
Provide opportunities for local artists to create and display their work. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Arts Programs and Events
OSR-
4.12:
Support arts activities, programs, events, and facilities for patrons to enjoy and share experiences, and that enhance the City’s economic vitality.
[New Policy for
2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
4.13:
Designate Community Services Department staff with the responsibi lity for expanding and implementing activities related to recreational arts programming. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
4.14:
Pursue cooperative educational cultural programs enlisting the aid of public and private institutions. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Arts in Public Places and in Private Development
OSR-
4.15:
Continue to review adopting an Arts in Public Places Program. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
OSR-
4.16:
Pursue the placement of public art in prominent locations, particularly along majo
r
travel corridors to enliven and beautify the public realm. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
OSR-
4.17:
Develop incentives or programs that encourage art in new developments. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-234-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 57
Historical and Cultural Resources Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address historical and cultural resources are as follows:
Goal HCR -1 :
Historical, Archeological, and Paleontological Resource Preservation
The City of Costa Mesa supports focused efforts to provide residents with a sense of community and history through the protection and preservation of historical and cultural resources. [2000 GP Goal HCR
-
1]
Objective HCR-
1A
: Encourage preservation and protection of the City’s archaeological, paleontological, and historical resources. [2000 GP Objective HCR
-
1A
]
Preserving Historical Resources
HCR
-
1.1:
Encourage protection and enhancement of the diverse range of historical sites and resources in the City for the benefit of current and future residents and visitors. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
HCR
-
1.2:
Encourage the preservation of significant historical resources (as identified in Table HCR-
1) by developing and implementing incentives such as building and planning application permit fee waivers, Mills Act contracts, grants and loans, and implementing other incentives identified in the Historical Preservation Ordinance. [2000 GP Policy HCR
-1A.4]
HCR
-
1.3:
Promote context -
sensitive design that respects and celebrates the history and historical character of sites and resources while meeting contemporary needs of the community. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
HCR
-
1.4:
Require, as part of the environmental review procedure, an evaluation of the significance of paleontological, archaeological, and historical resources, and
the
impact of proposed development on those resources.
[
2000 GP Policy
HCR
-1A.1]
HCR
-
1.5:
Continue to identify local landmarks with markers and way-
finding signage. Include
informational signage about local history, utilizing maps to highlight locations
of
other historical resources at popular historical sites. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035
GP]
HCR
-
1.6:
Encourage development of an interpretive center for paleontological, archaeological, and historical resources at Fairview Park. The center may contain resou
rces found in the park area as well as resources found throughout the City. [2000 GP Policy HCR
-1A.6]
Preserving Archaeological Resources
HCR
-
1.7:
Require cultural resources studies (i.e, archaeological and historical investigations) for all applicable
discretionary projects, in accordance with CEQA
regulations. The studies should identify cultural resources (i.e., prehistorical sites, historical sites, and isolated artifacts and features) in the project area, determine their eligibility for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources, and provide mitigation measures for any resources in the project area that cannot be avoided. Cultural resources studies shall be completed by a professional archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in prehistorical or historical archaeology. [2000 GP Policy HCR
-
1A.2
and HCR-
1A.3
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP
]
-235-
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 58
HCR - 1.8: Comply with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act regarding protection and recovery of archaeological resources discovered during development activities. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
Preserving Paleontological Resources
HCR
-
1.9:
Require paleontological studies for all applicable discretionary projects. The studies should identify paleontological resources in the project area, and provide mitigation measures for any resources in the project area that cannot be avoided. [2000 GP Policy HCR-
1A.2 and HCR
-
1A.3
– Modified for 2015
-
2035 GP]
HCR
-
1.10:
Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act regarding the protection and recovery of paleontological resources during development activities. [New Policy for 2015
-
2035 GP]
-236-
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (6th Edition) Page 75 [Updated: 6/29/23]
Appendix B.1
Housing Successor Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2020-2021
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2020-2021 P a g e | 1
COSTA MESA HOUSING AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT
AS HOUSING AUTHORITY AND AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 UNDER CALIFORNIA
HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 34176.1 AND 34328
This annual report (Report) of the Costa Mesa Housing Authority (Housing Authority) is prepared under the California Health and Safety Code (HSC), Division 24, Parts 1.8 and
1.85 (Dissolution Law), in particular Section 34176.1 as the housing successor, and under the California Housing Authorities Law, HSC Section 34200, et seq. (HAL), in particular Section 34328 as a housing authority. The Dissolution Law and HAL respectively require preparation of an annual r eport on the housing successor and the housing authority’s activities for the prior fiscal year. This Report details the Housing Authority’s activities during Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-21 and is intended to satisfy the requirements under both HSC Sections 34176.1 and 34328. More specifically, this Report includes information required about the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF) and other information under Section 34176.1(f).
This Report is based on information prepared by City staff on behalf of the Housing Authority and data contained within the independent financial audit of the LMIHAF (Audit), which is prepared by Davis Farr LLP and accompanies this Report . The Audit is incorporated in the City of Costa Mesa’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for FY 2020 -21. A copy of the Report in this draft form, has been provided to the City Council, as governing body, and to the Housing Authority under 34176.1(f). Upon their joint review and action to file the Report in an open meeting in January 2022, this Report will be posted on the City’s website www.costamesaca.gov and thereafter appended to the City’s annual update report prepared under Section 65400 of the Government Code.
This Report conforms with and is organized into sections I through XIV, inclusive, under HSC Section 34176.1(f) of the Dissolution Law and Section 34328 of the HAL:
I. Amounts Received and Deposited Under 34191.4(b)(3)(A) . This section provides the total amount of funds paid to the City and the amount deposited into the LMIHAF representing 20% of repayments on the reinstated City/Agency loan per Section 34191.4.
The Department of Finance (D OF) approved a total of $ 1,905,703 attributable to the reinstated City/Agency loan under Section 34191.4 . The Successor Agency received $1,902,703 in FY 2020-21, and had excess cash on hand of $3,000 from previously approved obligations . Of the $ 1,905,703, $ 1,524,562 (representing 80% of $ 1,905,703) was due to the City . The remaining balance was deposited into the LMIHAF upon receipt in May 2021, totaling $381,141 (representing 20% of $1,905,703).
II. Amount Deposited into LMIHAF. This section provides the total amount of funds deposited into the LMIHAF in FY 2020-21 and itemized by amounts listed on Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS), amounts representing Section 34191.4 deposits, and other amounts deposited into the LMIHAF. In FY 2020-21, the amount of $ 381,141 (representing 20% of $1,905,703) was deposited into the LMIHAF;
-238-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2020-21 P a g e | 2 $0 was held for items listed on the ROPS; and
other deposits into the LMIHAF in FY 20 20-21 were: (1) $ 396,753 rental income, and (2) $29,349 loan repayments,
The LMIHAF suffered a $2,497 investment loss.
The net cumulative total of all deposits into the LMIHAF was $804,748 during FY 2020-21.
III. Ending Balance of LMIHAF. This section provides a statement of the balance in the LMIHAF as of the close of FY 2020-21. Any amounts deposited for items listed on the ROPS and amounts representing Section 34191.4 deposits, must be distinguished from the other amounts deposited.
At the close of FY 2020-21 on June 30, 20 21, the ending balance in the LMIHAF was $3,715,185, of which $0 was held for items listed on the ROPS.
IV. Description of Expenditures from LMIHAF. This section provides a description of expenditures made from the LMIHAF during FY 2020-21. The expenditures are to be categorized among (A) administration for monitoring, preserving covenanted housing units; (B) homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services ; and (C) development of housing.
The table below lists and describes FY 2020-21 LMIHAF expenditures by category:
Monitoring
and
Administration
Expenditures
Costs for monitoring, enforcement, and preserving
long-term affordable housing covenants imposed by
the former Costa Mesa Redevelopment A gency
(Former Agency) or the Housing Authority, as
housing successor.
The maximum expe nditure for this category in FY
2020-21 is the greater of (a) 5% of the statutory value of (i) real property owned by the housing successor
and (ii) loans and grants receivable, or (b) $200,000
(plus allowed CPI adjustments).
Based on the valuation listed in Section V,
[lines 5+6 in that table=$5,186,389] for FY 2020-21,
the Housing Authority as housing successor was
authorized to spend up to $ 259,319 (i.e., 5% of
$5,186,389), but only expended $134,880.
$134,880
Homeless
Prevention
and Rapid
Rehousing
Services
Costs for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing
supportive services for individuals and families who
are homeless or would be homeless without this
assistance.
250,000
-239-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2020-21 P a g e | 3 Expenditures The housing successor was authorized to spend up to $250,000 for this category in FY 2020-21 and had
spent $250,000.
Housing
Development
Expenditures
Costs for housing “development”, which term is
defined to inc lude: (a) new construction, (b)
acquisition and rehabilitation, (c) substantial
rehabilitation, (d) long-term affordability covenants
on multifamily units, and (e) preservation of assisted
affordable housing that is eligible for (i) prepayment, (ii) termination, or (iii) for which the expiration of
rental restrictions is scheduled to occur within five
years.
The costs in this category represent the operating
costs for a 30 -apartment low and very low income
housing property , which the housing successor
intends to solicit proposals from housing providers
to purchase and extend affordability.
The 30 apartments within eight properties commonly
referred to as James /W. 18th Properties, were
acquired by the City and Housing Authority through
non-judicial foreclosure proceedings in FY 2015-
2016. This acquisition was made in order to
preserve the long-term affordable housing
covenants which were at risk of termination and
potential conversion to market housing.
The eight properties are still owned by the Housing
Authority and continue to be operated as affordable
housing units for low and very low income
households/tenants by a professional p roperty
management company. The operating costs for the
property include staff salaries and benefits, utilities, supplies, repairs and maintenance, taxes, property
management fees, legal and consulting costs . The
total amount spent in FY 2020-21 was $172,558.
172,558
Total FY 2020-21 LMIHAF Expenditures $557,438
V. Statutory Value of Assets Owned by Housing Successor. This section provides the statutory value of real property owned by the Housing Authority, as housing successor, the value of loans and grants receivables, and the sum of these two amounts.
Under Dissolution Law and for purposes of this Report, the “statutory value of real property” means the value of properties formerly held by the Former Agency as listed on the housing asset transfer schedule approved by the DOF under Section 34176(a)(2), the value of the properties transferred to the housing successor under Section 34181(f), and the purchase price of properties purchased by the Housing -240-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2020-21 P a g e | 4 Authority. Further, the value of loans and grants receivable is included in these reported assets held in the LMIHAF.
The following table provides the statutory value of assets owned by the Housing Authority as of the end of FY 2020-21:
VI. Description of Transfers. This section describes transfers, if any, to another housing successor made in previous fiscal year(s), including whether the funds are unencumbered and the status of projects, if any, for which the transferred LMIHAF will be used. The sole purpose of the transfers must be for development of transit priority projects, permanent supportive housing, regional homeless shelter s, housing for agricultural employees, or special needs housing.
The Housing Authority, as housing successor, did not make any LMIHAF transfers to other housing successor(s) under Section 34176.1(c)(2) during FY 2020-21.
VII. Project Descriptions. This section describes any project for which the Housing Authority, as housing successor, receives or holds property tax revenue under the ROPS and the status of that project.
The Housing Authority, as housing successor, does not receive or hold property tax revenue under a ROPS.
VIII. Status of Compliance with Section 33334.16. As and if applicable, this section provides a status update on compliance with Section 33334.16 for interests in real property acquired by the former redevelopment agency prior to February 1, 2012.
For interests in real property, if any, acquired on or after February 1, 2012, provide a status update on the project.
Section 34176.1 provides that Section 33334.16 does not apply to interests in real property acquired by the Housing Authority, as housing successor, on or after February 1, 2012.
With respect to interests in real property acquired by the Former Agency prior to February 1, 2012, the time periods described in Section 33334.16 shall be deemed to have commenced on the date that the DOF approved the property as a housing
1. Cash and Investments $3,389,539
2. Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agent 23,652
3. Interest Receivable 4,940
4. Rent Receivable 17,297
5. 6. Value of Loans and Grants Receivable 650,674
Total Statutory Asset Value $8,621,817
Statutory Value of Real Property Owned by
the Housing Authority
As of June 30, 2021
End of FY 2020-21
4,535,715
-241-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2020-21 P a g e | 5 asset in the LMIHAF; thus, as to real property acquired by the Former Agency, now held by the Housing Authority as housing successor, in the LMIHAF, the Housing Authority as housing successor, must initiate activities consistent with development (as the term is explained in Section IV and Section 34176.1(a)(3)(D)) of the real property for the purpose for which it was acquired within five years of the date the DOF approved such property as a housing asset.
In this regard, the Housing Authority as housing successor, did not own any real property acquired for development (to be developed) as of dissolution on February 1, 2012 subject to this limitation so the five-year limitation of Section 33334.16 does not apply.
It is noted that the F ormer Agency held at dissolution, now the Housing Authority holds as landlord/ground lessor, the underlying fee interests in three Ground Leases with Costa Mesa Family Village, a California limited partnership, as tenant/ground lessee (affiliate of Shapell Properties) relating to the existing 72-unit multifamily affordable housing apartment development called Costa Mesa Family Village, located at 1924 and 1981 Wallace Avenue and 2015 Pomona Avenue. The three ground leases end/expire in 2039. Section 33334.16 does not apply to such ground leases and this existing affordable housing development as the subject property was not held for development; it is developed property.
IX. Description of Outstanding Obligations under Section 33413. This section describes outstanding inclusionary and replacement housing obligations, if any, under Section 33413 that remained outstanding prior to dissolution of the former redevelopment agency as of February 1, 2012, along with the Housing Authority’s progress, as housing s uccessor, in meeting those prior obligations, if any, of the former redevelopment agency and how the Housing Authority, as housing successor, plans to meet unmet obligations, if any.
Replacement Housing: Under the Former Agency’s last Implementation Plan in effect prior to dissolution (the 2010-2014 plan), the Former A gency’s replacement housing obligations, if any, under Section 33413(a) were transferred to the Housing Authority as housing successor ; however, the F ormer Agency had no outstanding replacement housing obligations as of dissolution on February 1, 2012.
Inclusionary/Production Housing. Under the Former Agency’s last Implementation Plan in effect prior to dissolution (the 2010 -2014 plan) , its inclusionary/production housing obligations, if any, under Section 33413(b) were transferred to the Housing Authority as housing successor ; however, the Former Agency had no outstanding inclusionary/production housing obligations as of dissolution on February 1, 2012.
Therefore, the Housing Authority, as housing successor, has no outstanding replacement or inclusionary/production housing ob ligations and thus no implementation obligation under Section 33413.
For information, the Former Agency’s Implementation Plan is posted on the City’s website at www.costamesaca.gov.
-242-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2020-21 P a g e | 6
X. Income Test. This section provides information required by Section 34176.1(a)(3)(B), or a description of expenditures by income category and restriction for the applicable five -year period, with the time period beginning January 1, 2014 and whether the statutory thresholds have been met. However, the income test is not required until year 2019.
The applicable provisions of Sections 34176.1(a)(3)(A)(B)(C) require that the Housing Authority, as housing successor, must require at least 30% of the LMIHAF to be expended for development of rental housing affordable to and occupied by households earning 30% or less of the Area Median Income (AMI). If the Housing Authority as housing successor, fail s to comply with the extremely-low income requirement in a five-year report ing period, then the provisions of Section 34176.1(B) will apply in each fiscal year following the latest fiscal year following the Report are expended for the development of housing occupied by extremely low income households until the housing successor demonstrates compliance with such requirement in a subsequent annual report.
FY 2018 -19 was the end of the initial five -year period under Section 34176.1(a)(3)(B). The Housing Authority’s next five-year report on compliance with Section 34176.1(a)(3)(A) is due in FY 2023-24.
XI. Senior Housing Test. This section provides the percentage of deed-restricted rental housing units restricted to seniors and assisted individually or jointly by the housing successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction within the previous 10 years in relation to the aggregate number of units of deed- restricted rental housing assisted individually or jointly by the housing successor, its former redevelopment agency and its host jurisdiction within the same 10-year time period.
The housing successor is to calculate the percentage of units of deed-restricted rental housing restricted to seniors and assisted by the housing successor, the Former Agency and/or the City within the previous 10 years in relation to the aggregate number of units of deed-restricted rental housing assisted by the housing successor, the Former Agency, and/or City within the same time period. If this percentage exceeds 50%, then the housing successor cannot expend future LMIHAF funds to assist additional senior housing units until the Housing Authority as housing successor, or City assists and construction has commenced on a number of restricted rental units that is equal to 50% of the total amount of deed- restricted rental units.
As reported in the prior FY 2018-19 annual report, for the 10-year period of January 1, 2004 to January 1, 2014, 9.8% of the funds were expended on assistance to provide senior affordable housing units and 90.2% of the funds were expended on assistance to provide non -senior/family affordable housing units. In particular, 36 senior units with long-term 55-year affordability covenants were established during the previous 10-year period (specifically, the St. John’s Manor Project in 2006).
For the current 10-year period of January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2024 that includes the subject FY 2020-21, the Housing Authority expended no funds ($0) for senior housing thus far ; therefore 0% of funds were expended on development or -243-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2020-21 P a g e | 7 assistance to develop senior housing units.
XII. Excess Surplus Test. This section provides the amount of excess surplus in the LMIHAF, if any, and the length of time that the housing successor has had excess surplus, and the housing successor’s plan for eliminating the excess surplus.
The term excess surplus is defined in Section 34176.1(d) as: “an unencumbered amount in the LMIHAF account that exceeds the greater of one million dollars ($1,000,000) or the aggregate amount deposited into the account during the housing successor’s preceding four fiscal years, whichever is greater.” The table below provides the Excess Surplus test for the preceding four years. The LMIHAF does not have an excess surplus.
XIII. Inventory of Homeownership Units. This section provides a summary of covenanted homeownership units assisted by the former redevelopment agency or the housing successor that include equity sharing and repayment provisions, including: (A) number of units; (B) number of units lost to the por tfolio in the last fiscal year and the reason for those losses; and (C) any funds returned to the housing successor due to losses or repayments.
This section provides an inventory of homeownership units assisted by the Former Agency and assumed by the Hou sing Authority as housing successor, that are
LMIHAF LMIHAF
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2021
Opening Fund Balance $ 3,640,616 $ 3,715,185
Less Unavailable Amounts:
Loans Receivable Net (862,534) (650,674) Encumbrances - - Available Housing
Successor Funds (A) 2,778,082 3,064,511
Limitation (Greater of $1,000,000 or four years deposits):
Aggregate Amount Deposited for last four years:
2020-21 N/A $ 804,746
2019-20 770,962 770,962
2018-19 827,902 827,902
2017-18 687,292 687,292
2016-17 922,994 N/A
Total $ 3,209,150 $ 3,090,902
Base Limitation $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
Greater Amount (B) $ 3,209,150 $ 3,090,902
Excess/Surplus [(A)-(B)] $0 $0
-244-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2020-21 P a g e | 8 subject to covenants or restrictions or to an ado pted program that protects the Former Agency’s investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund per Section 33334.3(f).
Total homeownership in ventory as of dissolution on February 1, 2012 (subparagraph (A) below) and inventory, losses, and repayments for the period from February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2021 (subparagraph (B) below) include:
(A) As of dissolution on February 1, 2012, the total number of homeownership units assisted by the F ormer Agency and had covenants and restrictions of rec ord was 41 units, which included loans and restricted single-family homes assisted by the Former Agency through its (1) First Time Homebuyer (FTHB) Program, (2) Single-Family Rehabilitation (SF Rehab) Program, (3) affordable housing projects with Habitat for Humanity of Orange County, and (4) Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
(B) The total number of homeownership units lost to the Housing Authority ’s portfolio as housing successor between February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2021, along with the reasons for those losses.
Total losses between February 1, 2012 and June 30, 2021: 30 units
Reasons for the units’ losses from the homeownership portfolio:
Principal Repayments: $744,920
Loan Impairment: $1,095,000
Foreclosure: $436,000
Funds returned to the Housing Authority as housing successor, as part of an adopted program that protects the Former Agency’s investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, including loan principal, interest, and equity sharing payme nts between February 1, 2012 and June 30, 2021 :
$1,173,174.
(C) The number of homeownership units lost to the Housing Authority’s portfolio as housing successor in FY 2020-21 and the reason for those losses.
Total losses to portfolio in FY 2020-21: 3 units
One homeownership loan was fully paid off. The total amount received from the full homeownership loan repayment was $18,313 and these funds were deposited into LMIHAF.
Two homeownership loans reached maturity date for FY 2020-21 and therefore forgiven as per the terms of the promissory note. The total of those loans is $172,741.
Two owners made partial payments on homeownership loans. Principal and interest p ayments re ceived totaled $11,036 and were deposited into the LMIHAF.
-245-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2020-21 P a g e | 9
The funds returned to the Housing Authority as housing successor, as part of an adopted program that protects the Former Agency’s investment of moneys from Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, included repayments of FTHB program loans. Total principal, interest, and equity sharing payments during FY 2020-21 was $29,349.
(D) The Housing Authority as housing successor, has existing co nsulting agreements with: AmeriN ational Community Services, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation (dba AmeriNat) and Farmers State Bank of Hartland, a Minnesota corporation. The agreements are related to certain, but not all, aspects o f administration of the Former A gency’s SF Rehab and FTHB programs that provided second lien mortgages for homeownership units. The consulting services include assistance with oversight and administration of amortized loan payments, if any, due; with tracking and calculation of loan balances in the event of payo ff; and, other administrative activities for these outstanding SF Rehab and FTHB loans.
In addition, the Housing Authority retains the services of Keyser Marston Associates, a professional housing economic consultant, and the Housing Authority legal advisors, City Attorney and Authority General Counsel Kimberly Hall Barlow of Jones & Mayer, and Celeste Stahl Brady of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth (SYCR). Counsel assist staff in reviewing legal issues related to outstanding SF Rehab and FTHB program loans, such as the refinancing of first lien mortgages consistent with SF Rehab and FTHB program refinancing criteria, repayments, impairment analyses, defaults, foreclosures, bankruptcies, renting out part of the home, short sale requests, and other issues that arise in the administration of the former Agency’s loan programs for ownership housing.
XIV. Additional Information: Housing Authority’s Activities for the preceding year (FY 2020-21) under HSC Section 34328.
Without repeating the infor mation presented above in this R eport, the Housing Authority:
(A) continued to monitor and enforce housing assets transferred from the Former Agency to the Housing Authority as housing successor , as well as other Housing Authority (non-housing successor) assets;
(B) continued property management and operation of the James/W.18th Properties. See Sections IV. And X. above for more detailed discussion about these properties.
(C) As housing successor under Section 34176.1(a)(2), the Housing Authority may expend up to $250,000 per fiscal year “for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services for individuals and families who are homeless or would be homeless but for this assistance, including the provision of short -term or medium-term rental assistance, housing reloc ation, and stabilization services including housing search, mediation, or outreach to property owners, credit repair, security or utility deposits, utility payments, rental assistance for a final -246-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2020-21 P a g e | 10 month at a location, moving cost assistance, and case manage ment, or other appropriate activities for homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing of persons who have become homeless.” In this regard in FY 2020-21 and as detailed in this Report, the Housing Authority’s LMIHAF provided partial funding for Community O utreach Workers who assertively work toward placing homeless individuals and families into temporary or permanent h ousing as it becomes available. Staff addresses the various needs represented by the local homeless population on a daily basis. Further, a part-time Management Analyst maintains the database that Community Outreach Workers and volunteers from varied community groups utilize to streamline their reporting and recordkeeping processes relative to placement of homeless individuals and families into housing.
-247-
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (6th Edition)
Appendix B.2
Housing Successor Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2021-2022
-248-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY
202
1-
2022 Page | 1
COSTA MESA HOUSING AUTHORITY
ANNUAL
REPORT
AS HOUSING AUTHORITY AND AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-202
2 UNDER CALIFORNIA
HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 34176.1 AND 34328
This annual report (Report) of the Costa Mesa
Housing
Authority (Housing Authority) is
prepared under the California Health and Safety Code (HSC),
Division 24, Parts 1.8 and
1.85 (Dissolution Law), in particular
Section 34176.1 as the housing successor, and
under
the California Housing Authorities Law, HSC Section 34200,
et seq.
(HAL), in particular
Section 34328 as a housing au
thority
. The Dissolution Law and HAL respectively re
quire
preparation of an annual r eport on the housing successor and the housing authority’s activities for the prior fiscal year. This Report details the
Housing Authority
’s activities
during Fiscal Year (FY) 20
21-22
and is intended to satisfy the requirements under both
HSC Sections 34176.1
and 34328. More specifically, this Report includes information required about the Low and Moderate
Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF) and other
information under Section
34176.1(f).
This R eport is based on information prepared by City staff on behalf of the Housing Authority and data contained within the independent financial audit of the LMIHAF (Audit), which is prepared by Davis Farr LLP and accompanies this Report. The Audit is incorporated in the City of Costa Mesa
’s
Annual Comprehensive
Financial Report (ACFR)
for FY 202
1-22.
The City Council and the Housing Authority will review and file the Report in an open meeting in January 202
3;
upon their review and approval, this Report will be
posted on the City’s website
www.costamesaca.gov and thereafter appended to the City’s annual update report prepared under Section 65400 of the Government Code .
This Report conforms with and is organized
into sections I through XIV
,
inclusive, under
HSC Section 34176.1(f) of the Dissolution Law and Section 34328 of the HAL:
I.
Amounts Received and Deposited Under 34191.4(b)(3)(A) . This section provides the total amount of funds paid to the City and the amount deposited into the LMIHAF representing 20% of repayments on the reinstated City/Agency loan per Section 34191.4.
The Department of Finance (D OF) approved a total of $
1,
749,586 attributable to
the reinstated City/Agency loan under Section 34191.4. The Successor Agency received $
1,
749,586 in FY
202
1-22. O
f the $1,749,586, $1,399,669 (representing
80 % of
$1,
749,586) was
due
to the City . The remaining
balance
was deposited
into the LMIHAF upon receipt in
May
202
2 , totaling
$
349,917 (representing 20%
of $1,749,586
).
II. Amount Deposited into LMIHAF. This section provides the total amount of funds deposited into the LMIHAF in FY
20 21-22
and itemized by amounts listed on
Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule
(ROPS), amounts representing Section
34191.4 deposits, and other amounts deposited into the LMIHAF. •
In FY
202
1-22, the amount of
$349,917
(representing 20% of
$1
,749,586)
was deposited into the LMIHAF;
•
$0
was held
for items listed on the ROPS; and
•
other deposits into the LMIHAF in FY 20 21-22 were: (1)
$
362,445 rental
income
,
(2) $11,259 loan repayments, (3) $ 91,836 investment loss, and (4) -249-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report
FY 2021
-
2022
Page | 2
$6,945 in other reimbursements.
The cumulative total of all deposits
into
the LMIHAF was $638,730 during FY 202
1 -
22. III. Ending Balance of LMIHAF.
This
section provides a statement of the balance
in
the
LMIHAF as of the close of FY 2021-22. Any amounts deposited
for items listed
on the ROPS and amounts representing Section 34191.4 deposits, must be
distinguished from the other amounts deposited.
At the close of FY 202
1 -22 on June 30, 20
2 2, the ending balance
in the LMIHAF
was $3,780,628
, of
which
$0 was held for items listed on
the ROPS.
IV. Description of Expenditures from LMIHAF.
This
section provides a description
of expenditures made from the LMIHAF during FY 2021-22. The expenditures are to be categorized among (A) administration for monitoring, preserving covenanted housing units; (B) homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services ; and (C)
development of housing.
The table below lists and describes FY 202
1 -22 LMIHAF expenditures by
category:
Monitoring
and
Administration
Expenditures
Costs for monitoring, enforcement, and preserving
long - term affordable housing covenants imposed by
the former Costa Mesa Redevelopment A gency
(Former Agency) or the Housing Authority, as
housing successor.
The maximum expe nditure for this category in FY
202 1 -22 is the greater of (a) 5% of the statutory value of (i) real property owned by the housing successor
and
(ii) loans and grants receivable, or (b) $200,000
(plus allowed CPI adjustments).
Based on the valuation listed in Section V,
[lines 6+7 in that table=$ 4,979,221 ] for FY 20 2 1-22, the Housing Authority as housing successor was
authorized to spend up to $ 248,961 (i.e., 5% of
$4,979,221), but only expended $138,279
.
$138,279
Homeless
Prevention
and
Rapid
Rehousing
Services
Expenditures
Costs for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing
supportive services for individuals and families who
are homeless or would be homeless without this
assistance.
The housing successor was authorized to spend up
to $250,000 for this category in FY
202
1-22 and
spent $250,000
.
250,000
-250-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report
FY 2021
-
2022
Page | 3
Housing
Development
Expenditures
Costs for housing “development”, which term is
defined to inc lude: (a) new construction, (b)
acquisition and rehabilitation, (c) substantial
rehabilitation, (d)
long
-
term affordability covenants
on multifamily units, and (e) preservation of assisted
affordable h
ousing that is eligible for (i) prepayment,
(ii) termination, or (iii) for which the expiration of
rental restrictions is scheduled to occur within five
years.
The costs in this category represent the o perating
costs for a 30
-
apartment low and very low income
housing property , which the housing successor
intends to solicit proposals from housing providers
to purchase and extend affordability.
The 30 apartments within eight propertie s commonly
referred to as James /W. 18th Properties, were
acquired by the City and Housing Authority through
non
-
judicial foreclosure proceedings in FY 2015
-
2016. This acquisition was made in order to
preserve the long-term affordable housing
covenants which were at risk of termination and
potential conversion to market housing.
The eight properties are owned by the Housing
Authority and continue to be operated as affordable
hou
sing units for low and very low
income
households/tenants by a profes sional p roperty
management company. The operating costs for the
property include
staff
salaries and benefits,
utilities,
supplies, repairs and maintenance, taxes, property
management fees, legal, and consulting costs. The
total amount spent in FY
202
1 -22 was $185,007
.
185,007
Total FY 2021-22 LMIHAF Expenditures $573,286
V. Statutory Value of Assets Owned by Housing
Successor. This section
provides
the statutory value
of real property owned by the Housing Authority, as housing successor, the value of loans and grants receivables, and
the sum of these
two
amounts.
Under Dissolution Law and
for purposes of this Report, the “statutory value
of real
property” means the value
of properties formerly held
by the Former Agency as
listed on the housing asset transfer schedule approved
by the DOF under Section
34176(a)(2), the value
of the properties transferred to the housing successor
under
Section
34181(f), and the purchase
price of properties purchased
by the Housing
Authority. Further, the
value
of loans and grants receivable
is included in these
reported assets held in the LMIHAF.
The following table provides the statutory value
of assets owned
by the Housing
-251-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report
FY 2021
-
2022
Page | 4
Authority as of the end of FY 20 21-22:
VI. Description of Transfers. This section describes transfers, if any, to another housing successor made in previous fiscal year(s), including
whether the funds are
unencumbered and the status of projects, if any, for which the transferred LMIHAF will
be
used. The sole purpose
of the transfers must be for development of transit
priority projects, permanent supportive
housing, regional homeless shelter s,
housing for agricultural employees, or special needs housing.
The Housing Authority, as housing successor, did
not make any LMIHAF transfers
to other housing successor(s) under Section 34176.1(c)(2) during FY 2021-22.
VII. Project Descriptions. This section
describes any project for which the Housing
Authority, as housing successor,
receives
or holds property tax revenue
under the
ROPS and the status of that project.
The Housing Authority, as housing successor, does not receive or hold
property tax
revenue under a ROPS.
VIII. Status of Compliance with Section 33334.16. As and if applicable, this section
provides a status update on compliance
with Section
33334.16 for interests in real
property acquired by the former redevelopment agency prior to February 1, 2012.
For interests in real property, if any, acquired on or after February 1, 2012, provide a status update on the project.
Section 34176.1
provides that
Section
33334.16 does not apply to interests in real
property acquired
by the Housing Authority, as housing successor, on or after February 1, 2012.
W
ith respect to interests in real property acquired by the Former Agency prior to February 1, 2012, the time periods described in Section 33334.16
shall be deemed
to have
commenced on the date
that
the DOF approved the property as a housing
asset in the LMIHAF; thus, as to real property acquired
by the Former Agency, now
held by the Housing Authority as housing successor, in the LMIHAF, the Housing Authority as housing successor, must initiate activities consistent with development (as the term is explained in Section IV and Section 34176.1(a)(3)(D)) of the real property for the purpose for which it was acquired within five years of the date the
1. Cash and Investments $3,448,364
2. Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agent 22,800
3. Interest Receivable 6,095
4. Rent Receivable 16,509
5. Accounts Receivable 291,913
6. 7. Value of Loans and Grants Receivable 608,296
Total Statutory Asset Value $8,764,902
Statutory Value of Real Property Owned by
the Housing Authority
As of June 30, 2022
End of FY 2021-22
4,370,925
-252-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report
FY 2021
-
2022
Page | 5
DOF approved such property as a housing asset.
In this regard,
the
Housing Authority as
housing
successor, did not own any real
property acquired for development (to be developed) as of dissolution on February 1, 2012 subject to this limitation so the five-year limitation of Section 33334.16 does not apply.
It is noted that the F ormer Agency held at dissolution, now the Housing Authority holds as landlord/ground lessor, the underlying fee interests in three Ground Leases with Costa Mesa Family Village, a California limited partnership, as tenant/ground lessee (affiliate of Shapell Properties) relating to the existing 72-unit multifamily affordable housing apartment development called Costa Mesa Family Village, located at 1924 and 1981 Wallace Avenue and 2015
Pomona Avenue. The
three ground leases end/expire in 2039. Section 33334.16 does not apply to such ground leases and this existing affordable housing development as the subject property was not held
for development; it is developed property.
IX. Description of Outstanding Obligations under Section 33413
.
This section
describes outstanding
inclusionary and replacement housing
obligations, if any,
under Section 33413 that remained outstanding prior to dissolution of the former redevelopment agency as of February 1, 2012, along
with the Housing
Authority’s
progress, as housing s uccessor, in meeting those prior obligations, if any, of the former redevelopment agency and how the Housing
Authority, as
housing
successor, plans to meet unmet obligations, if any.
Replacement Housing: Under the
F
ormer Agency’s last Implementation Plan in
effect prior to dissolution (the 2010
-
2014 plan), the Former A gency’s replacement
housing
obligations, if any, under Section 33413(a) were transferred to the Housing Authority as housing successor ; however, the F ormer Agency had no outstanding replacement housing obligations as of dissolution on February 1, 2012.
Inclusionary/Production Housing. Under the
F
ormer Agency’s last
Implementation Plan in effect prior to dissolution (the 2010
-
2014 plan) , its
inclusionary/production housing
obligations, if any, under Section 33413(b) were
transferred to the Housing Authority as housing successor ; however, the Former Agency had no outstanding inclusionary/production housing obligations as of dissolution on February 1, 2012.
Therefore, the Housing Authority, as housing successor, has no outstanding replacement or inclusionary/production housing obligations and thus no implementation obligation under Section 33413.
For information, the Former Agency’s Implementation Plan is posted on the City’s website at
www.costamesaca.gov.
X. Income Test. This section provides information
required
by Section
34176.1(a)(3)(B), or a description of expenditures by income category and restriction for the applicable five -year period, with the time period
beginning
January 1, 2014
and
whether the statutory thresholds have
been met. However,
the income test is not required
until
year 2019
.
-253-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report
FY 2021
-
2022
Page | 6
The applicable provisions of Section s 34176.1(a)(3)(A)(B)(C) require that the Housing Authority, as housing s
uccessor, must
require at least 30% of the LMIHAF
to be expended for development of rental housing affordable to and occupied
by
households earning 30% or less of the Area Median Income (AMI). If the Housing Authority as housing successor, fail s to comply
with the extremely-low
income
requirement in a five-year report ing period , then the provisions of Section 34176.1(B) will apply in each fiscal year following the latest fiscal year following the Report are expended for the development of housing occupied by
e
xtremely low
income households until the housing successor demonstrates compliance with
such
requirement in a subsequent annual report.
FY 2018
-
19 was the end of the initial five
-
year period under Section
34176.1(a)(3)(B). The Housing Authority’s next five
-
year report on compliance with
Section 34176.1(a)(3)(A) is due in FY 2023
-
24. XI. Senior Housing
Test. This section provides the percentage of deed
-
restricted
rental housing
units restricted to seniors and assisted individually or jointly by the housing successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction within the previous 10 years
in
relation to the aggregate number of units of deed-
restricted rental housing
assisted individually or jointly by the
housing successor,
its former redevelopment agency and its host jurisdiction within the same 10
-
year
time period.
The housing
successor is to calculate
the percentage of units of deed-restricted
rental housing restricted to seniors and assisted by the housing s
uccessor,
the
Former Agency and/or the City within the previous 10
years in relation
to the
aggregate
number of units of deed
-
restricted rental housing assisted by the
housing successor, the Former Agency, and/or City within the same
time period. If
this percentage exceeds 50%, then the
housing successor cannot expend future
LMIHAF funds to assist additional senior housing units until the Housing Authority as housing successor, or City assists and construction has commenced on
a
number of restricted rental units that
is equal to 50% of the total amount of deed-
restricted rental units.
As reported in the prior FY 201
8 -19 annual report, for the 10-year period
of January
1, 2004 to January 1, 2014, 9.8% of the funds were expended on assistance to provide senior affordable housing units and 90.2% of the funds were expended on assistance to provide non
-
senior/family affordable housing units. In particular, 36 senior units with long
-
term 55
-
year affordability covenants were established during
the previous 10
-
year period (specifically, the St. John’s Manor Project in 2006).
For the current 10
-
year period of January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2024 that includes the subject FY
202
1 -22, the Housing Authority expended no funds ($0) for senior housing thus far ; therefore 0% of funds were expended on development or assistance to
d
evelop senior housing units.
XII. Excess Surplus Test. This section provides the amount of excess surplus in the LMIHAF, if any, and the length of time that the housing
s
uccessor has
had
excess
surplus, and the housing
s
uccessor’s
plan for eliminating the excess
surplus.
The term excess surplus is defined in Section 34176.1(d) as: “an unencumbered -254-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report
FY 2021
-
2022
Page | 7
amount in the LMIHAF account that exceeds the greater of one million dollars ($1,000,000) or the aggregate amount deposited into the account during the housing successor’s preceding four fiscal years, whichever is greater.” The table below provides the Excess Surplus test for the preceding four years. The LMIHAF does not have an excess surplus.
XIII. I nventory of Homeownership Units.
This section provides a summary of
covenanted homeownership units assisted by the former redevelopment agency or the housing successor that include equity sharing and repayment provisions, including: (A) number of units; (B) number of units lost to the portfolio in the last fiscal year
and the reason for those losses;
and (C) any funds returned to the
housing successor due to losses or repayments.
This section provides an inventory of homeownership units assisted by the Former Agency and assumed by the Housing Authority as housing successor, that are subject to covenants or restrictions or to an ado
pted program that protects the
Former Agency’s investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund per Section 33334.3(f).
Total homeownership in
ventory as of dissolution on February 1, 2012
(subparagraph
(A) below) and inventory, losses, and repayments for the period from February 1, 2012 through
June 30, 20
22 (subparagraph (B) below) include:
(A)
As of dissolution on February 1, 2012, the total number of homeownership units
LMIHAF LMIHAF
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2022
Opening Fund Balance $ 3,715,185 $ 3, 780,628
Less Unavailable Amounts:
Loans Receivable Net (650,674) ( 608,296) Accounts Receivable - ( 291,913) Encumbrances - - Available Housing
Successor Funds (A) 3,064,511 2,880,419
Limitation (Greater of $1,000,000 or four years deposits):
Aggregate Amount Deposited for last four years:
2021-22 N/A $ 638,730
2020-21 804,746 804,746
2019-20 770,962 770,962
2018-19 827,902 827,902
2017-18 687,292 N/ A
Total $ 3,090,902 $ 3, 042,340
Base Limitation $ 1,000,000 $ 1, 000,000
Greater Amount (B) $ 3,090,902 $ 3, 042,340
Excess/Surplus [(A)-(B)] $ - $ - -255-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report
FY 2021
-
2022
Page | 8
assisted by the F ormer Agency and had covenants and restrictions of rec ord was 41 u
nits, which included
loans and restricted single
-
family homes assisted
by the
F
ormer Agency through its (1) First Time Homebuyer
(FTHB)
Program,
(2) Single-Family Rehabilitation
(SF Rehab) Program, (3) affordable housing
projects with Habitat for Humanity of Orange County, and (4) Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
(B)
The total number of homeownership units lost to the Housing Authority ’s portfolio as housing successor between February 1, 2012 through June 30, 20 2
2, along with the reasons for those losses.
Total losses between February 1, 2012 and
June 30, 2022: 30 units
Reasons for the units’ losses from the homeownership portfolio:
Principal Repayments: $756,408
Loan Impairment: $1,095,000
Foreclosure: $436,000
Funds returned to the Housing Authority as housing successor, as part of an adopted program that protects the Former Agency’s investment of moneys
from
the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, including loan principal, interest, and equity sharing payments between February 1, 2012 and
June 30, 202 2:
$1,184,433
(C) The number of homeownership units lost to the Housing Authority’s portfolio as housing successor in FY
202
1 -22 and the reason for those losses.
There were no homeownership units lost to the Housing Authority’s portfolio as housing successor in FY 20
21 -
22. One owner made
partial
payments on homeownership loans . Principal and
interest p ayments received totaled
$
11,259
and were deposited into the
LMIHAF.
The funds returned to the Housing Authority as housing successor, as part of an adopted program that protects the Former Agency’s investment of moneys from Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund,
included
repayments of
FTHB
program loans. Total principal, interest, and equity sharing payments during
FY
2021-22 was $11,259
(D) The Housing Authority as housing successor, has existing co nsulting agreements with: AmeriN ational Community Services, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation (dba AmeriNat) and Farmers State Bank of Hartland, a
Minnesota
corporation
. The agreements are related
to certain, but not all, aspects o f
administration of the Former A gency’s SF Rehab and
FTHB
programs that
provided second lien mortgages for homeownershi p units. The consulting services include assistance with oversight and administration of amortized loan payments, if any, due; with tracking and calculation of loan balances in the event of payoff; and, other administrative activities for these outstanding SF -256-
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report
FY 2021
-
2022
Page | 9
Rehab and FTHB loans.
In addition, the Housing Authority retains the services of Keyser Marston Associates, a professional housing economic consultant, and the Housing Authority legal counsels
,
City Attorney and Authority General Counsel Kimberly
Hal
l Barlow of Jones & Mayer, and
Celeste Brady of Stradling Yocca Carlson
& Rauth (SYCR).
Counsels
assist staff in review ing legal issues related to
outstanding SF Rehab and FTHB program loans, such as the refinancing of first lien mortgages consistent with SF Rehab and FTHB program refinancing criteria, repayments, impairment analyses, defaults, foreclosures, bankruptcies, renting out part of the home, short sale requests, and other issues that arise in the administration of the former Agency’s loan programs for ownership housing.
XIV. Additional Information:
Housing Authority
’s Activities for the preceding year (FY
2021-22) under HSC Section 34328.
Without repeating the infor mation presented above in this R eport, the
Housing
Authority:
(A)
continued to monitor and enforce
housing assets transferred from the Former
Agency to the Housing Authority as housing successor , as well as other Housing Authority (non-housing successor) assets;
(B)
continued property management and operation of
the
James/W.18th
Properties. See Sections IV. And X. above for more detailed discussion about these properties.
(C) As housing successor under Section 34176.1(a)(2), the Housing Authority may expend up to $250,000 per fiscal year “for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services for individuals and families who are homeless or would be homeless but for this assistance, including the provision of short -term or medium-term rental assistance, housing relocation
,
and stabilization services
including housing search, mediation, or outreach to property owners, credit repair, security or utility deposits, utility payments, rental assistance for a final month at a location, moving cost assistance, and case management, or other appropriate activities for homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing of persons who have become homeless.” In this regard in FY
20 21
-
22 and as
detailed in this Report, the Housing Authority’s LMIHAF provided partial funding for Community Outreach Workers who assertively work toward placing homeless individuals and families into temporary or permanent housing as it becomes available. Staff addresses the various needs represented by the local homele
ss population on a daily basis.
Further, a part-time Management Analyst
maintains the database that Community Outr each Workers and volunteers from varied community groups utilize to streamline their reporting and recordkeeping processes relative to placement of homeless individuals and families into housing.
-257-