COSTA MESA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
COMMITTEE
ANNUAL REPORT
April 15, 2025
1 COMMITTEE
INFORMATION
Formed by the City Council in
2015
2024 committee revised to nine
members
2 2024 Composition
–
9 Active Members
Andrew Barnes
Michael (Moses) Nolf
Alex Campoli
Jose Gomez
Former:
(served 1
st
Qtr
2024)
Farhad
Khosravi
Flo Martin
Robert Morse
Michaela
T eissere
Trace
Yulie
Bridget Gleason
Ralph T aboada
Jennifer Vavra
Jimmy Vivar
City Council Liaison
Arlis
Reynolds
Newport
-
Mesa Unified
School District Liaison
Shelley Humphrey
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION VISION
3 City Council Goals/Objectives
2021 thru 2024
• Advance environmental sustainability
and climate resiliency.
• Strengthen the public’s safety and
improve the quality of life
o Approve a Pedestrian Master Plan for
inclusion in the City’s General Plan
Circulation Element.
o Approve a plan to mitigate collisions
and injuries on roadways.
Goals of the Active Transportation Plan (ATP)
• Promote a user-friendly and welcoming Active
Transportation System in Costa Mesa.
• Create a safer place to walk and ride a bicycle.
• Integrate Active Transportation Elements into the
Circulation System and Land Use Planning.
• Promote an Active Transportation culture.
• Promote the positive air quality, health, and economic benefits of Active Transportation.
• Monitor, evaluate, and pursue funding for implementation of the Active Transportation Plan.
COMMITTEE MEETINGS
• Met eight times in 2024
• Forum for public comments
• Help implement Council’s vision
• Bring community voices/issues to staff
• Review/recommend Active Transportation (AT)
projects/programs
• Advocate AT projects throughout community
4 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
• Earth Day
• TEAM SoCalCross Cyclocross Race
• Bike and E-Bike Safety Training
• Bike Light Distribution
5 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
• Walk to School Day
and Bike to School
Day: Both events continue to
grow year after year!
▪ 13 Schools participated in
Walk to School Day
▪ 11 schools participated in
Bike to School Day
▪ ~3,900 students
participated along with
Committee Members,
CMPD, Staff, NMUSD and
local advocates
6 Bicycle and Pedestrian
Fatality/Injury Maps
2022 2023
7 Source: Berkeley TIMS
2024*
*Through 9/30/24
Making Our Street Safer
Pedestrian and Bicyclist
Crash Results 2022-2024
T otal Crashes: 345
T otal Victims: 9 Killed & 365
Injured
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
8 CITY ACCOMPLISHMENTS
• Updated Municipal Code
• Placentia Avenue/West 19th Street
Active Transportation Improvements
• New HAWK and Pedestrian Signals
• Speed Limit Reductions on 76
Roadway Segments
• Signal Modernization In Progress
• Bicycle Wayfinding Signage
• Adams/Pinecreek Intersection
• Bike Racks
9 CITY ACCOMPLISHMENTS
• AT Project
Recommendations/Review
• Pedestrian Master Plan
Recommendations for Adoption
• Bus Shelter Contract Comment
• Easement and Right-of-Way
Vacations
10 CITY ACCOMPLISHMENTS
• $7.9 Million OCTA Complete
Streets Program Grant Award
• Adams Avenue Multipurpose
Trails – Santa Ana River to Royal
Palm Drive
• Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility
– Harbor Boulevard to Fairview
Road
• Fairview Road Active
Transportation Improvements
Adams Ave to Fair Drive
11 RESULTS
12 Placentia Ave
AT infrastructure has reduced the number of vehicle crashes for ALL Car crashes have been reduced as well as injuries to pedestrians and bicyclists.
2.5 3.25
6 1
0 1
0.5 0.75 0.75
0 0
1 0
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 W. 19th St - Parkcrest Dr to Placentia AveW. 19th St - Placentia Ave to Pomona Ave Placentia Ave- 20th St to 16th St
AVGERAGE NUMBER OF COLLISIONS
Average Number of Collisions per Six
-
Month
Period
Total Collisions Before Project
Total Collisions After Project
Bike/Pedestrian Collisions Before Project
Bike/Pedestrian Colisions After Project
COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS
13 CIP
AT Project
Recommendati
ons: Submit
our list of
recommended
projects, for
next year’s
budget, to City
Council.
Align grant
applications
process with
CIP priorities.
Collect safety
data before and
after CIP
implementation
Safety
Safe Routes to
School: Work
with Staff,
Consultant,
NMUSD and
community.
Prioritize and
implement
projects/programs
that contribute to
the reduction of
collisions to the
ZERO
fatality/severe
injury level.
Education
Earth Day April
2025: Host a
booth and engage
with community
members to
promote Active
Transportation
and the
committee.
Increase
community
outreach and
involvement for
adult education
events.
Other
Increase road
equity for children
and young families
desiring active use.
Support additional
CMPD resources
for enforcement.
Implement no turn
on red light rule at
recommended
intersections.
Council work
through legislative
channels to help
CalTrans improve
safety along 55/
Newport Blvd
corridor
CHALLENGES
14 INCREASED USE OF MULTI-
MODAL TRANSPORTATION
Places a higher demand for more
Active Transportation infrastructure
(including permanent separation),
police, staff and public awareness of
new municipal code.
PACE OF PROGRESS
Mode shift to biking and walking is
good but need to make more
progress to meet ATP goals of 10%
bicycle and 20% walking.
Budget constraints.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Existing staff split their time with other
job responsibilities.
Backlog of Capital Improvements would
benefit from additional PM resources.
Multiple Active Transportation projects
entering construction phase.
VEHICLES & ROAD
HAZARDS
Excessive speed, DUI and
distracted driving.
City Council Meeting
April 15, 2025
Green Mart at 1912 Harbor Boulevard
Appeal of Planning Application PCUP-24-0011
2 Planning Application PCUP-24-0011
• Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a retail cannabis storefront with delivery
• Proposed business is “Green Mart”
• Measure Q: voters approved ballot measure in 2020 to allow retail cannabis uses in the City
3 Retail
Cannabis
Storefront
CUPs
1912 Harbor Blvd
4 Retail Cannabis Application Process
GREEN MART
5 Project Location and Zoning District
PROPOSED
STOREFRONT
PROPOSED
STOREFRONT
C1- Local Business
C2-General Business
PDC-Planned Development
Commercial
6 Shopping Center Adjacent Uses
1912 HARBOR
1912 HARBOR• Dentistry
• Food and Beverage
• Market/Deli
• Massage
• Cell Phone Retail
• Dog Grooming
• Flooring Retail
7 Existing Conditions
8 Existing Conditions
1912 HARBOR
1912 HARBOR
9 Proposed Exterior
10 Site Plan
ALLEY
HARBOR BOULEVARD
TO
W.19TH
1912
SHARED
PARKING
SHARED
PARKING
CANNABIS VENDOR & DELIVERY
VEHICLES MUST BE (UN)LOADED
AT 1912 HARBOR & UNDER
CAMERA SURVEILLANCE
1912
11 Floor Plan
LIMITED
ACCESS
CUSTOMER
ACCESS
EMPLOYEES
AND ID-VERIFIED
CUSTOMERS
ALLEY
LIMITED
ACCESS
DOOR
12 Cannabis Standard Conditions of Approval (COA)
• More than 45 standard conditions of approval related to cannabis storefronts.
Onsite security guard during hours of operation
Odor control devices & their maintenance required
Consumption & loitering prohibited
Age restrictions for customers & employees
Changes in ownership/operation subject to City review and approval Permit renewal process
State license & compliance with applicable State regulations 13 Site Specific COAs
• Building Permit COA No. 5: site and building improvements such as removing unpermitted enclosure, adding landscaped planters, fencing, and a bike rack (PC added the bike rack shall be designed to not be blocked by cars)
• CBP COA No. 7: parking lot signs related to being quiet and considerate of neighbors
• Operational COA No. 25: business staff shall periodically monitor the parking lot to ensure customers are using consideration • Operational COA No. 26: the alley cannot be utilized for parking, loading, or unloading
14 CBP/CUP Enforcement COAs
• General COA 1: The Planning Commission may modify or revoke any planning application based on findings related to public nuisance and/or noncompliance with conditions of approval [Title 13, Section 13-29(o)]. • General COA 6: Use authorized by this CUP must be conducted in accordance with all applicable State and local laws…any violation thereof shall be a violation of the conditions of this permit and may be cause for revocation of this permit.
• General COA 13: CBP may be revoked pursuant to Section 9-120 of the CMMC for failing to comply with the terms of the permit, the applicable provisions of the CMMC, State law and/or any condition of any other permit issued… Revocation of the CBP shall trigger the City’s proceedings to revoke the CUP and amendments.
15 Required CUP Findings
• The Planning Commission made the following three required CUP findings:
Finding No. 1: “The proposed development or use is substantially compatible with developments in the same general area and would not be materially detrimental to other properties within the area”.
Analysis: The proposed retail cannabis store is located in a commercial retail zoning district within a retail shopping center with a diversity of other retail uses. No detrimental impacts to adjacent uses are anticipated as there are numerous operational conditions required, such as: security, lighting, odor, and hours of operation.
16 Required CUP Findings
Finding No. 2: “Granting the conditional use permit will not be materially detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the public or otherwise injurious to property or improvements within the immediate neighborhood”.
Analysis: A security and safety plan was approved for the proposed cannabis operations. A licensed security guard will be present during operation hours. Examples of security devices include window and door alarms, motion-detectors, limited access areas, and a monitored video surveillance system covering all exterior entrances, exits, and all interior limited access spaces. Therefore, the CUP will not be injurious to the neighborhood, property, or materially detrimental to public health and safety.
17 Required CUP Findings
Finding No. 3: “Granting the conditional use permit will not allow a use, density or intensity which is not in accordance with the General Plan designation and any applicable specific plan for the property”.
Analysis: The property is located in the “Commercial Residential” General Plan Land Use District. The intent of this land use designation is to allow a mix of commercial and residential uses and accommodate a full range of commercial activities desired in Costa Mesa. Retail cannabis uses are allowed in the applicable zoning district (C-1, Local Business District) and the Costa Mesa voters approved Measure Q to allow retail cannabis in 2020. No change in existing retail floor area is proposed.
18 Planning Commission Decision
• Planning Commission approved the application at the February 24, 2025 meeting on a 3-2 vote.
Commissioners asked questions about bicycle racks,
delivery/vendor parking, inability to require parking minimums per AB 2097, security guards, background checks, existing site conditions, complaint tracking, and staff access between the point of sale systems and sales floor.
Planning Commission added a condition of approval to ensure the bike rack area would not be blocked/occupied by vehicles. Majority of Commissioners found the use compliant with the required CUP findings.
19 Appeal
• Adjacent property owner filed an appeal on March 3, 2025, and noted the following general reasons for the appeal:
Plans provided insufficient detail;
Architectural incompatibility with adjacent buildings; Potential parking impacts to the adjacent property;
Parking lot circulation conflicts;
Operational issues related to vehicle loading/unloading, odor control, safety, and loitering;
Burden of business enforcement on adjacent properties; and Character of applicant and absentee landlord.
20 “De Novo” Hearing
• City Council hearing is a “de novo” review
• The City Council may exercise its independent judgment and discretion in making a decision
• The appeal hearing is not limited to the grounds stated for the review or the evidence that was previously presented to the Planning Commission • The City Council’s decision on the matter is the final decision 21 Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to:
• Find the project categorically exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) per Section 15301 (Class 1; Existing
Facilities); and
• Uphold the Planning Commission’s decision and
approve Planning Application PCUP-24-0011 subject
to conditions of approval and code requirements
APPEAL OF CUP APPROVAL
PCUP -24- 0011
REQUEST TO DENY CUP
•Location Does
Not Conform to
Zoning Standards
•Site Unsuitability
•Applicant’s
History
2 HARBOR PLACE
1902- A, 1902- B, 1904, 1906
HARBOR BLVD.
440- 446 WEST 19TH STREET
3 PROPOSED GREEN MART
1912 HARBOR BLVD.
4 INCOMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING USES
CMMC SECTION 13 -200.93
Proposed Project and
Harbor Place Zoned C1 –
Local Business
Blue Sol Apartments Within
Planned Development
Commercial (PDC)
5 CMMC §13- 200.93(E)
CANNABIS RETAIL STOREFRONT LOCATION
• (1) No cannabis retail storefront use shall be located within…250 feet from a property zoned for residential use; 6 CMMC §13- 200.93(E)(1)
(A) & (B)
• In 2004, the City approved a Master Plan to
include the development of the ”Plaza
Residences.”
• CMMC Section 13-20 requires a master plan
to activate provisions of overlays and urban
plans.
• In 2012, the City approved an amendment to
this portion of the PDC, Master Plan PA-02-
11A, which allowed the Blue Sol Apartments
to be developed.
• Although in the PDC Zone, the project at
421 Bernard, immediately behind the
proposed cannabis use, is a residential use
pursuant to CMMC § 13-200.93(e)(1)(b).
• No cannabis storefront may locate
with 250 feet of a residential use.
(a) For the purpose of identifying separations from cannabis storefronts and properties zoned for residential use,
properties zoned for residential use are within the following zoning districts: R1 Single-Family Residential District, R2-MD Multiple-Family Residential District, Medium Density, R2-HD Multiple-Family Residential District, High Density, R3
Multiple-Family Residential District, TC Town Center District, PDR-LD Planned Density Residential—Low Density, PDR-MD
Planned Development Residential—Medium Density, PDR-
HD Planned Development Residential—High Density, and
PDR-NCM Planned Development Residential—North Costa
Mesa.
(b) Where a non-residential property was developed for
residential or mixed residential use in accordance with an overlay, urban plan, or specific plan, and the
residential development and use remains, the property
would be considered residential when establishing a
separation from cannabis storefronts.
7 CMMC §13- 200.93(E)
No cannabis retail storefront
use shall be located within
1,000 feet from a…youth
center, that is in operation at
the time of submission of a
completed cannabis business
permit application
CMMC §9-485 “Y outh center means any public or
private facility that is primarily used to host
recreation or social activities for minors, specifically private youth membership organizations or clubs,
social services teenage club facilities, video arcades
where 10 or more games or game machines or
devices are operated or similar amusement park
facilities, but does not include dance studios, tutoring, martial arts studios or similar type of uses.”
8 The First Methodist Church of Costa Mesa, situated immediately contiguous to the proposed cannabis storefront, “celebrate children and include them in our church community, providing a safe and fun environment for them to learn and grow.”
UNIQUE PHYSICAL
CONDITIONS OF PROPERTY
o - Shared common wall
o - Shared ingress and egress
o - Alleyway
o - Separate parcels
o - Separate centers/projects
o - Separate, independent
landlords
o - Prior “convenience store”
use denied by City
9 FINDING: INCOMPATIBLE
USE
• (1) The proposed development or use is
not substantially compatible with
developments in the same general area
and would be
materially detrimental to
other properties within the area
10 FINDING : MATERIALLY
DETRIMENTAL
(2) Granting the minor conditional use
permit will be materially detrimental to the
health, safety and general welfare of the
public or otherwise injurious to property or
improvements within the immediate
neighborhood
(3) No identified safety measures – inability
to secure or access front and back of
property
11 APPLICANT’S HISTORY
• CUP for restaurant/bar revoked – upheld by
California Court of Appeal
• Admitted to bribing former Mayor of Upland
to restore CUP
• Former Costa Mesa restaurant/bar closed,
high volume of calls for service while
operating
• Unpermitted Covid nightclub in residential
• Unpermitted adult film studio in residential
• Admitted lying under penalty of perjury to
avoid Code Enforcement
• Admitted lying to landlord to operate
nightclub
• Continuing unpermitted activity in Costa
Mesa
Demonstrated pattern of
abuse of local regulations
and disregard for community
12 Gatsbyoc
Gatsby Podcast: Episode 1: Origin
https://vimeo.com/941425083/184c126184
13 REVOKED CUP
• Court of Appeal Decision Found:
• Specifically, the CUP itself provided that it may be
revoked “if the permittee has violated any rule,
regulation or condition of approval or if the
operation permitted under the conditional use
permit is operated in a manner contrary to the
peace, safety and general welfare of the public or
which results in undesirable activities creating an
increased demand for public services[.]”
• Judgment Affirmed.
• Schaller v. City of Upland: 2011 WL 1832950• - Revoked by Upland Planning Commission due to high
volume of calls for service
• - Upheld by Upland City
Council
• - Upheld by Trial Court
• - Upheld by Court of Appeal
14 ADMINISTRATIVE
VIOLATIONS UPHELD
Violations of operating
unpermitted nightclub and
adult fil studio in residential
property upheld
15 REQUEST CITY COUNCIL
DENY
PCUP -24- 0011
City Council cannot make the findings
required to approve this proposed use:
• Site violates the location criteria required
by CMMC 13-200.93(e) and (e)(1)(b) in
that the site is within 1,000 feet of youth
center and 250 feet from a property zoned
for residential uses.
• Site unsuitable for the development of a
storefront retail cannabis facility because:
o Narrow, attached to surrounding off-
site properties (potential for
nuisances, including exposure to
toxic and flammable materials)
o Site has limited vehicular circulation
o As conditioned, security access to
the rear is hampered
16 1912 Harbor Blvd, Costa Mesa 92627
April 15th, 2025
Costa Mesa, CA
Appeal of PCUP 24-0011
Experienced Management & Ownership Team
Mikael Marczak
● Entrepreneur & Industry Leader – Over 15 years of
experience across multiple industries, founding iconic
cannabis brands such as Evergreen Management,
Sauce Essential, Paragon LLC, and MKM
Management.
● Founder of Dime Industries – Since 2016, built a
luxury cannabis vape brand with over 30 industry
awards, expanding operations from California to 9
U.S. states and Canada.
● Diverse Business Acumen – Proven success in
cannabis manufacturing, real estate, and student loan
consolidation, showcasing adaptability and expertise.
● Cannabis Licensing Expert – Trusted leader in
securing cannabis licenses and forging high-profile
brand collaborations, driving growth and success.
Keith Scheinberg
● Entrepreneur & Innovator – Specializes in recovery
equipment, founding Cryo Innovations in 2015 to develop the safest and most advanced cryotherapy units on the
market
● Owner Cryo Recovery Lounge- Specializing in
rehabilitation and proving recovery for veterans and first responders.
● Scientific & Legal Expertise – Holds a B.S. in Biology (Genetics) from SDSU, law degree from Chapman
University, blending science, law, and innovation.
● R&D Pioneer – Led research for Johnson & Johnson,
securing grants for synthetic blood prototypes and U.S. military contracts for fire-retardant technology.
● Military & Leadership Experience – New Mexico Military Institute ROTC prep, and currently State Active Duty in the CSG with the 40th Infantry Support Division based out of Los Alamitos, CA .
Proposed Location - Positioning
Address: 1912 Harbor Blvd, Costa Mesa, CA 92627
Cross Streets: Harbor Blvd and W 19th St
Description: 2400 sq/ft stand alone building
Neighboring Cannabis Business:
420 Central
High Seas
Surrounding Businesses: Carpet and flooring, dog
grooming, coffee shop, hair salon, cupcakes,
massage - No conflicting uses to proposed use
Proposed Location
& Improvements
BEFORE
After
Proposed Location &
Improvements
AFTER
After
Proposed Layout and Delivery Location
Delivery Spot
Delivery Spot
Interior Look and Feel
Interior Look and Feel
Community Involvement
Homeowner and Resident
● Property owner and resident for 25+ years
● Ranked top 103 most influential people 2
years in a row for giving back to the
community through charitable events.
● Numerous committee appointments
throughout Costa Mesa residency.
Costa Mesa Support
● Giving back to CM/NB first responders
through my other businesses with free
recovery services:
CRYO RECOVERY LOUNGE
● Donations to CMFD toy drive every year
Community Outreach
● Notification packets, including project
details and contact information were
mailed to all residents and businesses
within a 500-foot radius
● Neighboring tenants were met with by
Keith Scheinberg
Commitment to the Community and Neighbors
● Green Mart will ONLY be hiring Costa Mesa residents and will providing them ebikes to get to and from work to take advantage of CM’s very friendly street bike program.
● In February Keith Scheinberg personally visited over 15 nearby businesses to discuss the project and collect feedback ● Parking was discussed with fellow neighbors and it was explained that our security will be directing people to park only in front of our unit as much as possible.
● All vendor deliveries will take place in one of two spots (labeled as such) directly in front of our unit which will be under multiple angles of surveillance cameras. Outbound deliveries will take place a few times a day and will notify the store that they are coming in to pick up the delivery items 30 min before they arrive. Security will reserve one of the two delivery spots (under cameras) for outbound delivery vehicle during this period of time. ● Based on the actual car traffic of local similar businesses not many spots are utilized by customers at one time so parking will not be an issue.
● Bike rack will be provided as to encourage local residents to bike to the store.
Competitive Advantage
1. Experienced Leadership: Our experience ownership has a decade of cannabis industry experience, ensuring
informed decision-making and effective operations as
well as business acumen.
2. Prime Location: Our building has been vacant for
almost 10 years allowing us to bring it to building code standards and prevent homeless encampments.
● With security present during operating hours our
reciprocal parking arrangement with the adjacent
center will not impact any neighboring properties
parking arrangements.
● 2,400 sq ft of space for a clean environment and
welcoming shop.
● High visibility location with significant car traffic,
increasing exposure and attracting customers.
Contributions to Costa Mesa
● Access to safe and sustainable cannabis: Providing high quality products and expert guidance for responsible consumption. ● Support of the local community and non-profits: Partnering with local organizations to promote wellness, education, and social responsibility.
● Beautification and modernization of the existing building: Enhancing the aesthetic appeal and safety of the surrounding area. ● Support of local businesses: Collaborating with nearby businesses as to cross market and support our neighbors ● Tax Revenue: Contributing to the city’s financial growth and development. ● Job creation and training: Offering employment opportunities and professional development for local Costa Mesa residents. ● Community events and education: Hosting workshops, seminars, and events to promote cannabis awareness and responsible use.
Thank you!
April 15th, 2025
Costa Mesa, CA
CUP REVOCATION ISSUE 2017
City Council Meeting
Tuesday, April 15, 2025
APPROVAL OF DRAFT
RELOCATION PLAN AND
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE FOR
TENANTS OF 778 SHALIMAR DRIVE
2 Background
• City is in escrow to purchase the
Property at 778 Shalimar Drive.
• Property contains four units, three of
which are occupied by four households.
• Acquisition will be for future community-
serving public uses.
778 Shalimar
3 Tenant Relocation
• To acquire the property, the City must relocate existing tenants • This includes payment of relocation and moving expenses, pursuant to various local, State, Federal requirements, and Escrow terms of the Purchase Agreement.
• The City hired Monument, Inc. to draft a tenant Relocation Plan, including:
• Tenant outreach,
• Relocation analysis, and
• A proposed relocation program.
4 Relocation Plan
• A Relocation Plan is a required document when the purchase of real property by a public entity may displace residents. The purpose of a Relocation Plan is to:
• Explain the relocation needs of the households that will be displaced; • Show how those needs will be met;
• Provide an analysis of housing resources; and
• Describe relocation payments, the plan for disbursement, and the source of the funds. • Pursuant to 25 CCR § 6038, public entities wishing to acquire real property must prepare a Relocation Plan and submit it for approval to City Council. 5 Relocation Plan Process: Timeline
6 Relocation Plan Findings
Assessment of Relocation Needs
• The draft Relocation Plan identified the following needs for the four households:
• Based on occupancy standards for housing density, two households would require a 2-bedroom unit, and one household would require a 4-bedroom unit. • Bilingual services were required.
• Special accommodations were required for one household. • The preferred relocation area was in Costa Mesa and the Orange County area.
Available Residential Replacement Sites
• The draft Relocation Plan found adequate replacement resources existed in the area for Property tenants.
• Monument identified the total relocation costs based on a survey of the surrounding areas.
7 Relocation Plan Findings (continued)
Proposed Relocation Assistance
• For relocation advisory assistance, Monument will provide bilingual administrative services to the Property tenants, including:
• Access to the database of available residential units for lease and sale; • Inspection of prospective units;
• Assistance with lease applications;
• Assistance with the arrangements of purchase of real property or the filing of requests for benefits or services; and
• Assistance in the preparation and submission of relocation assistance claims. • For relocation financial assistance, tenants may be eligible for certain classes of benefits, including:
• Moving expenses;
• Rental assistance, if renting; and
• Down payment assistance, if purchasing.
8 Relocation Assistance
• Monument calculated the relocation financial assistance based on household size, tenant interviews, and analysis of available sites. • This is a sample calculation:
• Monument calculated the total amount for all households as $168,764. • With a 20% contingency, the total calculated relocation costs will be $203,716.80. • Most units had one household. However, Unit 3 contained two households, increasing the amount for the FMV calculation.
*Per 25 CCR § 6104, the amount of replacement housing payments shall be for rent for 42 months.
Fair Market Value
(FMV) Rent
Tenant’s Current
Rent
Difference (Δ)
FMV – Current Rent
Δ for 42 Months*
of Rent
$3,000 – $2,000 = $1,000 x 42 = $42,000
9 Relocation Option: City-Owned Units
• Property tenants have the opportunity to relocate to City-owned affordable housing units in the immediate vicinity.
• The City owns various properties (yellow outline), in close proximity to the subject Property (red outline).
10 Relocation Option: City-Owned Units (continued)
• Interested tenants have applied through the City’s property manager, ProActive Realty, with assistance from Monument and City staff. • As of 4/15, one household has been accepted to the City-owned units and two households have applications in process.
Recommendations
1. Adopt a resolution approving the draft Relocation
Plan for the Shalimar Park Expansion Project’s
acquisition of real property located at Assessor’s
Parcel Number 424-051-23 (778 Shalimar Drive).
2. Authorize a budget adjustment appropriating a total
of $203,716.80 from the Housing Trust Fund for
relocation assistance, and authorize the City
Manager, City Attorney, and Finance Director to
implement the approved Relocation Program.
Questions?
City Council Meeting
April 15, 2025
APPOINTMENT TO THE ANIMAL SERVICES
COMMITTEE AND CONFIRMING THE ORANGE
COUNTY MODEL ENGINEERS (OCME) LIAISON TO
THE FAIRVIEW PARK STEERING COMMITTEE
BACKGROUND
• At the April 1, 2025 City Council meeting, Mayor Pro Tem Chavez requested an additional one week recruitment period for the Animal Services Committee only.
• The Committee recruitment period opened from April 2, 2025 to April 8, 2025. Recruitment press releases were sent on April 2, 7, and April 8, 2025. A total of 14 applications were received.
3 ANIMAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
• Make one (1) member appointment with a term expiration of April 2027 Appointment by Mayor Pro Tem Chavez
1. Brian Buckner – District 1
2. Randi Miller – District 1
3. Anke Secrest – District 1
4. Becca Walls – District 1
5. Christina Poulos – District 1
6. Kalvin Alvarez – District 2
7. Olivia M. Eimers – District 2
8. Carlos Salampessy – District 2
9. Syed Zia Hussain – District 2
10.Amber Watnik – District 2
11.Dana S. Lavin – District 3
12.Mackenzie 'Kenzie" Huth – District 4
13.Rhonda J. Christlieb – District 5
14.Debra Lee – District 5
RECOMMENDATION
1. Mayor Pro Tem Chavez make one (1) member appointment to the Animal Services Committee with a term expiration of April 2027.
2. The City Council confirm Hank Castignetti as the Orange County Model Engineers (OCME) liaison to the Fairview
Park Steering Committee.