Agenda packet — Costa Mesa City Council, June 3, 2025 (part 3 of 4)

6. Approve Resolution 2025-XX establishing the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Appropriations Limit for the City of Costa Mesa at $330,924,446, by using Orange County’s growth for population adjustment, and the California per capita income growth for inflationary adjustment; and

7. Approve the City of Costa Mesa’s Revised Special Event Rates; and

8. City Council action is requested as follows to comply with AB 481 Police Equi pment Report and Resolution:

a. Receive and file the 2025 Annual AB 481 Report and take public comment; and

b. Approve Resolution 2025-XX Renewing Ordinance No. 2022 -03, the AB 481 Equipment Use Policy of the City of Costa Mesa, California, governing the use of police safety equipment.

9. Receive and file the job vacancy status information required by AB 2561.

319
i

CITY OF COSTA MESA
CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE

June 3, 2025

To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, and Citizens of Costa Mesa:

It is my pleasure to present t he City of Costa Mesa’s Proposed Fiscal Year 202 5-26 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget. City staff have carefully considered the City Council’s priorities and goals during the budget development process to ensure the essential services and needs of the City are met .

The current uncertainty regarding
potential impacts of United States policies on global, domestic, and local economic conditions presents a challenging environment for both consumers and businesses. As a result, it is prudent to anticipate some slowdown in revenues leading into Fiscal Year 2025- 26, particularly in Sales Tax and Transient Occupancy Tax, while Property Tax is expected to continue to experience modest growth. During the development of the Fiscal Year 2025- 26 budget, the City diligently worked to balance the reduction in revenues due to economic uncertainties and the expected increase in cost for goods and services. However, you will find that, despite the decline in revenue and increase in costs, this carefully prepared budget ensures that services and programs will conti nue to be provided for its residents and business community.

The theme for the FY 2025- 26 Proposed Budget is, “Focused. Efficient. Resilient.” Staff will stay focused on the City’s mission to serve its community ; be efficient in all services delivered; while being resilient to the changing economic conditions. The dedication and collective efforts led by the City Council’s leadership, of staff, residents, businesses, and the non-profit sector all working together to improve outcomes for all residents and visitors to Costa Mesa.

Guiding Principles
The guiding principles that shaped the FY 2025 -26 Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget were established when the City Council conducted a Strategic Planning workshop identifying key priorities, as well as the Mission Statement for Costa Mesa, as follows:

“The City of Costa Mesa serves our residents, businesses, and visitors by promoting a safe, inclusive, and vibrant community.”

The City Council adopted five Strategic Plan Goals as outlined below:

 Strengthen the Public’s Safety and Improve the Quality of Life;  Achieve Long-Term Fiscal Sustainability;
 Recruit and Retain High Quality Staff;
 Diversify, Stabilize, and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs; and  Advance Environmental Sustainability and Climate Resiliency. 320
ii

In addition to the five goals, the City Council adopted six Core Values as part of their Strategic Plan:

 Integrity
 Sustainability
 Innovation
 Compassion
 Inclusion
 Collaboration

The recommendations in the FY 2025- 26 Proposed Budget are rooted in the Strategic Plan Goals and Core Values created by the City Council for a safe, inclusive, and vibrant City. The FY 2025 -26 Proposed Budget underwent a thorough review and in- depth analysis by multiple levels of staff . Funding requests contained herein to ensure both short-and-long term fiscal sustainability, while committing resources to achieve the City Council’s goals.

Recommended budget adjustments in the Proposed Budget were carefully considered based on operational needs, the provision of essential core services to the community and the effective implementation of the City Council’s stated Goals and Priorities.

Overview of FY 2025-26 Proposed All Funds Budget

The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget reflects the operating and capital spending plans for the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Capital Project Funds, and Internal Service Funds. The total proposed budget for all funds is $ 224.4 million, a decrease of $15.4 million, or 6 percent compared to the Fiscal Year 2024- 25 Adopted Budget of $239.8 million. Table 1 illustrates these amounts.

Table 1 – Proposed Budget – All Funds

The All -Funds Budget for the City includes both governmental and proprietary funds.

Governmental funds include the General Fund, Special Revenue funds and Capital Projects funds. The Special Revenue Funds are grants and other restricted funds designated for specific services and purposes provided by higher levels of government (i.e., Federal, State and County governments and agencies). Some of these funds receive ongoing revenue streams, while some are one-time competitive grants and require careful monitoring and record keeping. Proprietary funds are internal service funds that account for the City’s equipment replacement, sel f-insurance and workers ’ compensation expenses, and information technology replacement costs. 321
iii

In some instances, a fund can have available fund balances that have accumulated over time and are expended as the need arises and/or to complete specific projects within allotted timeframes. As such, the All -Funds Budget contains many funds that are separate entities with specific accounting and reporting requirements as per government regulations and in some cases, statutes.

The City’s General Fund however, is not restricted and can be used to provide a broad array of public services and is comprised of multiple revenue sources including taxes (such as property, sales, and hotel taxes, among others), user fees, fines, facility rentals, and development related fees, to name a few.

Federal Funding

On January 27, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order freezing all federal funding, this provided recipients less than 24 hours before federal portals closed. City staff successfully secured over $1.3 million in payments and continue to monitor policy changes to stay proactive of any changes to policy. The January 27th Executive Order on federal funding, and several subsequent Executive Orders, are currently frozen or suspended due to challenges within the courts. While policy shifts within the current Administration on spending, through the potential reduction of Federal grants, have yet to directly impact the City—these evolving changes could potentially thwart revenue sources to multiple departments within the City including, but not limited to the Police Department, Public Works, and Development Services.

Some of the Federally funded grants the City receives include Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) Grant, and Local Action Early Plan (LEAP) Grant—all three of which are from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Other Federal grants the City has been awarded include Justice Assistance Grant from the Department of Justice; Emergency Management Performance Grant (EPMG) from the Department of Homeland Security; and multiple road and safety grants provided by the US Department of Transportation.

Operating Budget
During the development of the Fiscal Year 2025- 26 Proposed Budget, staff were directed to request only necessary budget increases that provide crucial services to the City. The proposed Operating Budget incorporated minimal growth of 2%, or $4.9 million, in expenses to provide essential services. Leadership made a concerted effort to ensure a balanced All Funds budget of $204.1 million in the FY 2025-26 Operating Budget.

322
iv

Arts and Culture Master Plan Fund

The FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget includes the budget of year five of the Arts and Culture Master Plan Fund in the amount of $416,990, of which $227,472 is expected to be funded through the ½ cent Cannabis Measure Q tax allocation for the Arts. In the Arts and Culture Master Plan, $141,000 is budgeted for various free art experiences for the community , such as ARTVenture , Art Crawl, Park Performances, and tickets for shows and performances.

Transfers Out

The proposed General Fund Transfers O ut of $2.8 million provides funding for the Information Technology Replacement Fund (Fund 603) to invest in the City’s replacement of technology hardware and software. The overall transfers out decreased by $6.9 million from the FY 2024- 25 Adopted Budget due to the “Emergency Exception” clause of the Capital Asset Needs Ordinance under Section 2- 209.2 (a)(2), Economic Downturn. City staff will be utilizing its Capital Improvement Program (Fund 401) fund balance to fund $2.2 million in projects in the Proposed FY 2025- 26 Capital Improvement Program , budget to ensure compliance with the required maintenance of effort (MOE).

Capital Assets Needs (CAN)

On March 3, 2020, the City Council updated the City’s Financial and Budget Policies providing that the City allocates a minimum of five percent of General Fund revenues to fund capital expenditures and reallocat e one and a half percent previously dedicated to the Capital Facilities Account to the City’s Information Technology Needs. In the Proposed FY 2025-26 budget, staff is recommending a deferral of approximately $6.9 million in General Fund contribution to the capital improvement fund.

Capital Budget

The FY 2025-26 Proposed CIP Budget was presented at the April 22, 2025, City Council Study Session. The focus of this fiscal year is to complete existing projects within the 5- Year Capital Improvement Plan list. The proposed All -Funds Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget of $16.7 million is a decrease of $11.2 million, or 40 percent, from the Adopted FY 2024-25 budget.

In addition to the $16.7 million, the Capital Improvement Program includes $12 million for the Fire Station # 2 Reconstruction project that will be funded through future bond financing.

The $16.7 million CIP budget consists of $8.5 million in transportation projects, $7.4 million in street improvement projects, $25 0,000 in facilities improvement projects, and $550,000 in park improvement projects. While the Operating Budget represents costs that are expected to be spent each year for City services and programs, the Capital Budget is by nature a multi -year expenditure plan where many of the projects are completed in phases over a multi-year period.
323
v

FY 2025-26 Proposed General Fund Budget Overview

The Proposed FY 2025-26 General Fund expenditure budget is a balanced budget and totals $186.9 million. This reflects a decrease of $3 million, or 2 percent, from the FY 2024-25 Adopted Budget of $189.9 million. Table 2 is a summary of the FY 2025 -26 General Fund Proposed Revenue and Expenditure Budget.

Table 2 – General Fund Revenue and Expenditure

FY 2025-26 General Fund Revenue Highlights

The FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget for Total General Fund Revenues totals $186.9 million, a reduction of $3.0 million, or 2 percent decrease from the FY 2024-25 Adopted Budget.

Economic and consumer challenges that impacted Sales Tax in FY 2023-24 and FY 2024- 2025 continue to present potential headwinds in FY 2025-26 at the City, County, and State levels, and therefore have the biggest impact to overall City revenues. These f unds typically are used to cover public safety, parks and community services, development services, and other activities and programs known to residents. The Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2025, budget is balanced without the use of General Fund reserves.

Sales and Use Tax : Sales tax is the largest revenue category in Costa Mesa and is estimated at $7 5.1 million for FY 2025- 26, a reduction of $6. 5 million, or an 8 percent decrease from the FY 2024-25 Adopted Budget. General economic uncertainty due to the potential impact of tariffs on businesses and consumers, coupled with persistent inflation, and slower growth, could lead to a continued reduction in spending in such areas as automobiles, general consumer goods, and home renovations.

Property Tax: All combined Property Tax revenues are estimated at $63.0 million, reflecting a 4 percent growth over the prior fiscal year budget. Despite continued higher 324
vi

interest rates and limited supply, the competitiveness in the housing market continues to show resilience in terms of assessed values and number of home sales.

Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT): Hotel tax revenues are estimated at $9.8 million next year, reflecting a 3 percent decrease to FY 2024- 25 Adopted Budget. There is an anticipation of a potential slowdown in general consumer spending, and a reduction in international visitors to California. In addition, persistent inflation and economic uncertainty impact consumer confidence, discretionary income and savings levels, potentially impacting the travel and leisure segment of consumer spending.

Fees and Charges: Fees and Charges are estimated at $13.2 million, a decrease of $84,084, while Plan Check fee revenues are $1.8 million in FY 2025-26. Staff is proposing a consumer price index (CPI) increase of 3.3% to certain fees and proposing a credit card processing fee of 2.7%. In addition, staff is proposing a Technology Enhancement Fee of 5% on all permit fees to recover costs of future development related technology enhancements and system replacement, as well as a General Plan Maintenance Fee of 5% for on all applicable building permit fees, to offset a portion of the periodic costs associated with General Plan and supporting document updates. Adopting a Technology Enhancement Fee and General Plan Maintenance Fee allows staff to reserve amounts collected and use them to offset the costs accordingly.

Measure Q Retail Cannabis Business Tax: On November 3, 2020, voters approved the “City of Costa Mesa Retail Cannabis Tax and Regulation” Measure, also known as Measure Q, which allows cannabis retail storefront and delivery uses. City Council voted to adopt a 7 percent tax on cannabis retail businesses. The FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget includes an estimated $3.6 million in cannabis taxes, an increase of $195,583, or 6 percent from FY 2024-25. To date the City has approved over 20 retail storefront and non- storefront businesses. Also, as previously approved by the City Council, the Proposed Budget has two restricted special revenue funds that are financed by the cannabis retail tax:

The Arts and Culture Master Plan Fund (130) and First Time Homebuyers Fund (140).

325
vii

Graph 1 – General Fund Revenue Estimates by Category

FY 2025-26 General Fund Budget Expenditure Highlights

The Proposed Operating General Fund Budget for FY 2025-26 reflects total expenditures of $185.6 million. Of this amount, $180.2 million in operating costs represents an increase of $2.9 million, or 1.7 percent, compared to the current year’s adopted operating budget of $189.9 million. The General Fund will transfer $2.4 million to the Information Technology Fund, as described earlier. With the economic uncertainties, the City funds must be prudently allocated to areas where they will provide the greatest impact. The FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget for expenditures includes the following significant items:

• Salaries and benefit increase of $133,286 for a full -time Custody Officer in the Police Department.
• Includes $30,000 for firefighter personal protective equipment and $20,000 for training and supplies for the Emergency Operations Center and 9- 1-1 Center in Fire and Rescue Department.
• A $1.8 million increase in annual required CalPERS contributions. • An additional $2.3 million in compensation, as required per contractual MOU requirements.
• Continuation of the $4.3 million vacancy factor (negative appropriation). • No use of General Fund Reserves to balance the General Fund.

326
viii

Graph 2 – General Fund Total Appropriation by Department

Table 3 – Breakdown of General Fund Appropriation by Department

Department
FY 2020-21
Actual
FY 2021-22
Actuals
FY2022-23
Actual
FY 2023-24
Actual
FY 2024-25
Adopted
FY 2025-26
Proposed
City Council 644,712$ 867,909$ 834,337$ 750,577$ 874,089$ 954,143$ City Manager* 6,068,680 6,505,480 7,573,363 8,902,755 9,594,377 9,613,230 City Attorney 968,029 958,775 988,108 977,061 1,086,750 1,123,700 Finance 4,485,375 3,811,155 4,271,188 4,416,583 6,073,764 6,296,502 Parks and Community Services 7,414,732 6,379,328 7,371,372 9,753,352 9,037,068 9,101,830 Information Technology 3,760,148 4,104,946 5,133,365 5,567,967 6,402,558 6,570,716 Police 48,905,944 53,504,411 55,874,470 62,005,909 61,919,751 62,820,471 Fire and Rescue 27,042,315 32,298,517 33,480,396 35,159,635 37,772,922 38,903,466 Economic & Development
Services 6,325,666 7, 522,770 8,229,755 9,082,786 9,911,803 9,695,734 Public Works 17,801,071 19,517,456 20,413,479 23,101,963 23,659,001 22,553,602 Non-Departmental 11,614,781 27,397,679 32,457,225 23,423,354 23,562,076 19,222,213 Total 136,637,270$ 162,868,426$ 176,627,058$ 183,141,942$ 189,894,159$ 186,855,607$ *City Manager's Department includes City Clerk, Human Resources, and Risk Management 327
ix

Staffing Levels

On April 1, 2025, the City implemented a soft hiring freeze of positions outside of public safety. The FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget includes 599 full-time employees, which reflects a net decrease of three (3) positions. Positions eliminated were in the City Manager’s Department, which includes one (1) Human Resources Analyst, one (1) Programmer Analyst I, and one (1) Senior Management Analyst (CON) all funded by the General Fund.

Additionally, one (1) Community Outreach Worker position was eliminated in the Housing Authority Fund (Fund 222). However, there is an increase of one (1) Custody Officer in the Police Department that is vital to managing the workload of the City’s current jail staff.

Custody Officers are needed for the transportation and booking of arrestees to the Orange County Jail. This one additional Custody Officer will alleviate staffing challenges, promote safety and wellness, and reduce overtime costs.

Table 4 – Change in Staffing Levels

Table 5 - Budgeted Citywide Staffing Levels

Department Job Title FTE
Other Funds
City Manager Community Outreach Worker (1.00)
Other Funds Total (1.00)
General Fund
City Manager Human Resources Analyst (1.00)
City Manager Programmer Analyst I (1.00)
City Manager Sr. Management Analyst (CON) (1.00)
Police Department Custody Officer 1.00
General Fund Total (2.00)
Grand Total All Funds Impact (3.00)
611 611 611
498 497 465 466 477 478 479 477 480 492 502 530 550 588 600 602 599 0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Table of Organization
(Full-Time Employees)
FY 2007-08 to FY 2025-26
328
x

The Table of Organization reflects 599 full-time employees, however, not included is the allocation of 107.48 part-time employees for a total of 706.48.

Strengthen the Public’s Safety

The FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget allocates $101.7 million as the City’s commitment to public safety, comprising both the Police and Fire Departments. Public safety budgets account for more than 53 percent of the General Fund Proposed Budget, with 34 percent allocated to the Police Department and 21 percent to the Fire and Rescue Department.

Of the 599 citywide full-time personnel, approximately 38 percent are sworn officers — consistent with funding levels prior to the Great Recession.

The Police Department budget includes 142 full -time sworn personnel. The Proposed Budget adds one new Custody Officer. Additionally, the Police Department manages the entire Animal Services and Enforcement Program.

The Police Department’s salaries and benefits budget increased by a net of $1.0 million, primarily due to labor contractual agreements and retirement benefits. As in prior years, and to balance the General Fund, the Department includes a vacancy factor of approximately $3.7 million to account for its vacancy rate.

The Fire and Rescue Department consists of 85 full -time sworn personnel. Its salaries and benefits budget increased by a net of $1.1 million, largely due to labor contractual agreements and retirement costs. The Fire and Rescue Department includes an increase of $30,000 to fund additional firefighter personal protective equipment, and $20,000 to fund training and miscellaneous supplies for the Emergency Operating Center and the Dispatch Communications Center (9-1-1 Center).

General Fund Reserves Overview
The City continues to demonstrate strong fiscal prudence and controls over spending.

The combined commitment for emergency reserves including the declared disaster and economic reserves, is indicative of financial discipline. The General Fund reserves are currently at $60.3 million and exceed the City Council policy of $55.0 million by $5.3 million.

329
xi

Table 6 - General Fund Balance Overview

Conclusion

The Fiscal Year 2025- 26 Proposed Budget reflects a strong commitment to the City Council, residents, and community partners by ensuring the delivery of high- quality core public services and fulfilling the City Council’s highest goals and priorities.

We hope and believe that the FY 2025- 26 Proposed Budget theme, “Focused. Efficient.

Resilient.” embodies the values of the City of Costa Mesa and serves to enhance the quality of life for all its residents, regardless of their circumstances.

I would like to extend my gratitude to the Finance Department and its Budget Team, as well as the Executive Team, their managers, and departmental budget liaisons, for their dedication in preparing the FY 2025- 26 Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget. Under the City Council’s leadership, Costa Mesa will continue working alongside residents and community partners to ensure access to essential services and foster healthy, sustainable neighborhoods for everyone who calls Costa Mesa home.

Respectfully submitted,

Cecilia Gallardo-Daly
Acting City Manager
City of Costa Mesa

Fund Balance Category FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 F Y 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Audited Audited Audited A udited Estimate
Committe d
Declared Disasters $14,125 $14,125 $14, 125 $14,125 $14,125 Self-Insurance 2,000 2,000 2, 000 2,000 2,000
Economic Reserves 9,000 9,000 9, 000 9,000 9,000
Assigned
Compensated Absences 5,920 5,584 6, 210 5,982 5,982
Police Retirement 1% Supplemental 2,275 1,885 1, 737 1,572 1,572 Workers Compensation 1,000 2,000 2, 000 2,000
Facilities Reserve 2,000 2,000 2, 000 2,000
Strategic Plan Project 2,000 2,000 2, 000 2,000
Restricted
Pension and OPEB 1,778 3,061 3, 178 3,367 3,367
Non-spendable 965 604 459 631 631
Unassigned 17,429 16,517 16, 328 17,686 17,686
Total Fund Balance $53,492 $57,776 $59, 037 $60,363 $60,363 330
Resolution No. 2025-xx Page 1 of 3
ATTACHMENT 2

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-xx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared and submitted to the City Council a proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 in compliance with Section 2-119 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 2-209 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code requires the City to allocate a minimum of five percent (5%) of the annual General Fund revenues to the capital expenditures Fund and a minimum of one and a half percent (1.5%) of the annual G eneral Fund revenues to the Information Technology Replacement Fund, for a combined minimum allocation of six and a half percent (6.5%); and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a Strategic Planning workshop identifying key priorities, as well as a new Mission Statement for the City of Costa Mesa: “The City of Costa Mesa serves our residents, businesses, and visitors by promoting a safe, inclusive, and vibrant community.” and
WHEREAS, in addition to a new Mission Statement, five new Strategic Plan Goals were developed: (1) Strengthen the Public’s Safety and Improve the Quality of Life ; (2) Achieve Long- Term Fiscal Sustainability ; (3) Recruit and Retain High Quality Staff ; (4) Diversify, Stabilize, and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs; and (5) Advance Environmental Sustainability and Climate Resiliency; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing at its regular meeting on June 3 , 2025 regarding the proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the proposed Operating & Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 and input from the public, and desires to adopt the P roposed Operating & Capital Improve ment Budget for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026, as the Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

Section 1. The Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

Section 2. Th e Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026, as prepared and submitted by the City Manager, is hereby approved and adopted in the amount of $224,375,268.
331
Resolution No. 2025-xx Page 2 of 3
Section 3. The Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2025 -2026 shall be considered amended upon the close of Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 to include and reappropriate any outstanding encumbrances carried forward.

Section 4. T he Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 shall be considered amended upon the close of Fiscal Year 2025-2026 to include and reappropriate funds for all previously approved projects that have not been initiated or completed. The City Council authorizes the City Manager or Finance Director to carryover any balances on Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) from the prior years into the next fiscal year to ensure the continuation of projects that were approved.

Section 5. T he City Council authorizes the City Manager or Finance Director to make changes in internal service fund allocations to departments to reflect any modifications made after the Adopted Budget was presented.

Section 6. T he City Manager or Finance Director, for the purpose of administrative necessity in implementing the budget, shall have the authority to transfer monies to the appropriate item, account, program, department, or fund to cover expenditures which have been approved by the City Council, except where such transfer is expressly prohibited in a resolution or ordinance approved by the City Council. The City Manager or Finance Director shall also have the authority to transfer monies between and within funds to meet the operational needs of the City within established spending limits.

Section 7 :

That the Tables of Organization, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment 5 and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, is hereby approved and adopted. The City Manager may revise the Tables of Organization provided that the authorized number of personnel within the City is not exceeded.

Section 8 : That the City Manager or Finance Director may, as necessary, appropriate donations and grants received during the fiscal year up to $100,000 per source or grantor.

Donations and grant awards requiring matching funds (in- cash), or exceeding $100,000 from a single source or grantor, shall require City Council approval. Any resolutions authorizing budget amendments related to donations and grants in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

Section 9 : That the City Manager or Finance Director may, as necessary, appropriate revenue and expenditure allocations, for emergency public safety mutual aid requests, as expenses are incurred and reimbursements are received, for a net neutral fiscal impact.

Section 10:

That the City Manager or Finance Director may, as necessary, appropriate and transfer Federal American Rescue Plan (ARP) Funds, to comply with U.S. Treasury Guidelines and to facilitate audit review and compliance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of June, 2025.

332
Resolution No. 2025-xx Page 3 of 3

John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST:

Brenda Green, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025-xx and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 3rd day of June, 2025, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 3
rd day of June, 2025.

Brenda Green, City Clerk
333
All Funds Revenues and Sources of Funds
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Fund/Account Description
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 24-25
Adopted
Budget
FY 25-26
Proposed
Budget
%
Incr/
(Dec)

GENERAL FUND

Fund 101 - General Fund $ 177,491,471 $ 184,490,064 $ 189,894,159 $ 186,855,606 -2%

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Fund 130 - Cultural Arts Master Plan
Cannabis Q Bus Tax $ 16,000 $ 132,412 $ 238,300 $ 242,200 2% Total Fund 130 $ 16,000 $ 132,412 $ 238,300 $ 242,200 2%

Fund 140 - First Time Homebuyer Program
Cannabis X Bus Tax $ - $ - $ 238,300 $ 242,200 2% Cannabis Q Bus Tax 16,000 132,412 - - 0%
Total Fund 140 $ 16,000 $ 132,412 $ 238,300 $ 242,200 2%

Fund 150 - Disaster Fund
Operating Transfers In 637,856 - - - 0%
Other County Grants/Programs 306,283 - - - 0% Total Fund 150 $ 944,139 $ - $ - $ - 0%

Fund 201 - Gas Tax
Investment Earnings $ 116,514 $ 209,088 $ - $ - 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (46,049) 140,331 - - 0% Gasoline Tax - Section 2103 916,823 1,023,298 998,927 1,023,777 2% Gasoline Tax - Section 2105 640,351 682,428 698,377 716,150 3% Gasoline Tax - Section 2106 406,599 439,467 445,387 458,786 3% Gasoline Tax - Section 2107.1 872,692 923,725 954,427 977,383 2% Gasoline Tax - Section 2107.5 10,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 -50% Other Reimbursements - 167,874 - - 0%
Total Fund 201 $ 2,916,929 $ 3,596,212 $ 3,117,118 $ 3,186,096 2%

Fund 203 - Air Quality
Investment Earnings $ 6,644 $ 10,571 $ - $ - 0% Air Quality Improvement Fees 177,214 150,191 145,800 145,800 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (2,801) 6,940 - - 0% Total Fund 203 $ 181,057 $ 167,702 $ 145,800 $ 145,800 0%

Fund 204 - American Rescue Plan
Investment Earnings $ 208,050 $ 166,876 $ - $ - 100% American Rescue Plan 4,802,856 3,620,652 2,972,172 - -100% Total Fund 204 $ 5,010,906 $ 3,787,528 $ 2,972,172 $ - 100%

34 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
334
All Funds Revenues and Sources of Funds
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Fund/Account Description
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 24-25
Adopted
Budget
FY 25-26
Proposed
Budget
%
Incr/
(Dec)
Fund 205 - HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME)
Lien/Loan Repayment $ 40,000 $ 123,856 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 0% Investment Earnings 24,201 34,543 - - 0%
HOME Invest. Partnership Grant 137,581 930,233 509,260 376,014 -26% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (9,084) 3,752 - - 0% Total Fund 205 $ 192,698 $ 1,092,383 $ 529,260 $ 396,014 -25%

Fund 207 - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Lien/Loan Repayment $ - $ 30,900 $ - $ - 0% Community Dev. Block Grant $ 1,794,310 $ 619,833 $ 1,360,506 $ 874,288 -36% Investment Earnings 609 4 - - 0%
Total Fund 207 $ 1,794,919 $ 650,738 $ 1,360,506 $ 874,288 -36%

Fund 213 - Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLESF) Investment Earnings $ 887 $ (33) $ - $ - 0% Citizens’ Option Public Safety 284,819 321,103 331,480 332,622 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (365) 292 - - 0% Total Fund 213 $ 285,341 $ 321,361 $ 331,480 $ 332,622 0%

Fund 216 - Rental Rehabilitation Program
Investment Earnings $ 4,655 $ 6,975 $ - $ - 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (1,818) 4,318 - - 0% Total Fund 216 $ 2,837 $ 11,293 $ - $ - 0%

Fund 217 - Narcotics Forfeiture
Investment Earnings $ 28,497 $ 38,985 $ - $ - 0% Asset Forfeiture - Treasury 76,487 125,118 - - 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (10,745) 23,516 - - 0% Total Fund 217 $ 94,240 $ 187,619 $ - $ - 0%

Fund 220 - Office of Traffic Safety
Other Federal Grants $ 259,141 $ 170,219 $ - $ - 0% Total Fund 220 $ 259,141 $ 170,219 $ - $ - 0%

Fund 230 - Federal Grants
Investment Earnings $ 32,757 $ 78,150 $ - $ - 0% Other Federal Grants 826,056 31,179 6,033,090 6,382,000 6% Local Law Enforcemnt Blk Grnt 108,137 5,638 - - 0% Other State Grants - 47,310 - - 0%
Other County Grants/Programs - 83,009 - - 0% Total Fund 230 $ 966,950 $ 245,286 $ 6,033,090 $ 6,382,000 6%

Fund 231 - State Grants
Other State Grants $ 1,075,470 $ 2,994,375 $ 350,490 $ 375,000 7% Beverage Container Program 159,969 - - - 0% Total Fund 231 $ 1,235,439 $ 2,994,375 $ 350,490 $ 375,000 7%

35City of Costa Mesa, California
suMMarIes of
fInancIal data
335
All Funds Revenues and Sources of Funds
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Fund/Account Description
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 24-25
Adopted
Budget
FY 25-26
Proposed
Budget
%
Incr/
(Dec)
Fund 232 - Federal Grants
State/Local Partnership Grant $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - 0% Other Governmental Agencies - 63,602 500,000 500,000 0% Investment Earnings (4) 78 - - 0%
Total Fund 230 $ (4) $ 113,680 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 0%

Fund 251 - Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Gas Tax Investment Earnings $ 158,361 $ 297, 830 $ - $ - 0% Gasoline Tax - RMRA 2,510,541 2,902,974 2,878,935 2,951,612 3% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (66,616) 198,542 - - 0% Total Fund 251 $ 2,602,286 $ 3,399,347 $ 2,878,935 $ 2,951,612 3%

CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Fund 208 - Park Development Fees
Investment Earnings $ 52,806 $ 66,926 $ - $ - 0% Park Development Fees 158,327 142,598 100,000 100,000 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (19,612) 36,908 - - 0% Total Fund 208 $ 191,520 $ 246,433 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 0%

Fund 209 - Drainage Fees
Investment Earnings $ 37,174 $ 53,870 $ - $ 2,339 0% Drainage Assessment Fees 76,516 81,806 100,000 100,000 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (14,462) 32,291 - - 0% Measure “M2” Regional Grant 107,327 - - - 0% Total Fund 209 $ 206,555 $ 167,968 $ 100,000 $ 102,339 2%

Fund 214 - Traffic Impact Fees
Investment Earnings $ 98,890 $ 120,724 $ - $ - 0% Traffic Impact Fees 601,330 39,292 1,500,000 600,000 -60% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (38,513) 69,611 - - 0% Other Reimbursements 7,167 - - - 0%
Total Fund 214 $ 668,873 $ 229,627 $ 1,500,000 $ 600,000 -60%

Fund 401 - Capital Outlay
Investment Earnings $ 401,158 $ 726,432 $ - $ - 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (184,930) 477,293 - - 0% Other Federal Grants 190,599 2,972 - - 0% Other Governmental Agencies - 150,000 - - 0% Other Reimbursements 64,585 9,254 - - 0%
Other - 26,598 - - 0%
Total Revenues $ 471,412 $ 1,392,551 $ - $ - 0% Operating Transfers In $ 13,482,325 $ 7,194,994 $ 6,849,994 $ - -100% Total Other Financing Sources $ 13,482,325 $ 7,194,994 $ 6,849,994 $ - -100% Total Fund 401 $ 13,953,737 $ 8,587,545 $ 6,849,994 $ - -100%

36 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
336
All Funds Revenues and Sources of Funds
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Fund/Account Description
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 24-25
Adopted
Budget
FY 25-26
Proposed
Budget
%
Incr/
(Dec)
Fund 409 - Vehicle Parking District 1
Secured Property Tax $ 5,052 $ 9,124 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 0% Unsecured Property Tax 12 12 12 12 0%
Supplemental Property Tax 17 11 11 11 0%
Homeowners Property Tax 2 2 2 2 0%
Delinquent Tax - Penalties/Int 1 1 1 1 0% Investment Earnings 758 1,284 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (307) 870 - - 0% Total Fund 409 $ 5,535 $ 11,303 $ 4,026 $ 4,026 0%

Fund 410 - Vehicle Parking District 2
Secured Property Tax $ 10,243 $ 15,4 40 $ 12,260 $ 12,260 0% Unsecured Property Tax 10 10 11 11 0%
Supplemental Property Tax 14 9 11 11 0%
Homeowners Property Tax 1 1 2 2 0%
Delinquent Tax - Penalties/Int 0 0 1 1 0% Investment Earnings 1,723 2,844 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (695) 1,888 - - 0% Total Fund 410 $ 11,297 $ 20,193 $ 12,285 $ 12,285 0%

Fund 413 - Golf Course Improvement
Investment Earnings $ 10,573 $ 15,581 $ - $ - 0% Golf Course Operations 159,695 179,443 110,000 110,000 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (4,318) 9,183 - - 0% Total Fund 413 $ 165,951 $ 204,207 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 0% Fund 415 - Measure M2 Competitive
Measure “M2” Regional Grant $ 197,74 3 $ 680,760 $ 385,000 $ - -100% Total Fund 415 $ 197,743 $ 680,760 $ 385,000 $ - -100%

Fund 416 - Measure M2 Fairshare
Investment Earnings $ 92,748 $ 176,465 $ - $ - 0% Measure “M2” Fairshare 3,453,031 3,489,746 3,871,148 3,982,472 3% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (39,696) 119,330 - - 0% Total Fund 416 $ 3,506,083 $ 3,785,541 $ 3,871,148 $ 3,982,472 3% Fund 417 - Jack Hammett Sports Complex Capital Improvement Investment Earnings $ 3,766 $ 9,809 $ - $ - 0% Jack Hammett Field Rental 150,750 165,000 165,000 - -100% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (1,600) 7,527 - - 0% Total Fund 417 $ 152,915 $ 182,336 $ 165,000 $ - -100%

Fund 420 - Park Land Acquisition
Operating Transfers In $ - $ 384,576 $ - $ - 100% Investment Earnings $ - $ 1,516 $ - $ - 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt $ - $ 5,866 $ - $ - 0% Total Fund 420 $ - $ 391,958 $ - $ - 100%
37City of Costa Mesa, California
suMMarIes of
fInancIal data
337
All Funds Revenues and Sources of Funds
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Fund/Account Description
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 23-24
Actual
FY 24-25
Adopted
Budget
FY 25-26
Proposed
Budget
%
Incr/
(Dec)

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Fund 601 - Equipment Replacement Fund
Investment Earnings $ 133,510 $ 193,338 $ 52,313 $ 52,313 0% Sale of Automotive Equipment 57,220 118,453 - - 0% Sale of Other Equipment 10,739 59,764 - - 0% Automotive Equipment, Rental 5,442,580 5,846,393 5,901,286 5,901,286 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (56,771) 117,420 - - 0% Other Governmental Agencies 159,985 - - - 0% Damage to City Property 160 10,000 - - 0% Other Reimbursements 41,402 - - - 0%
Total Revenues $ 5,788,825 $ 6,345,367 $ 5,953,599 $ 5,953,599 0% Operating Transfers In $ 1,003,556 $ 170,000 $ - $ - 0% Total Other Financing Sources $ 1,003,556 $ 170,000 $ - $ - 0% Total Fund 601 $ 6,792,381 $ 6,515,367 $ 5,953,599 $ 5,953,599 0%

Fund 602 - Self Insurance Fund
Investment Earnings $ 279,402 $ 452,080 $ - $ - 0% Unemployment Premiums 80,180 80,180 80,180 80,180 0% General Liability Premiums 2,072,221 2,072,221 2,072,221 2,392,171 15% Workers’ Compensation Premiums 2,689,915 2,939,914 2,939,914 2,939,914 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (125,604) 283,642 - - 0% Settlements Revenue 1,326,382 - - - 0%
Total Revenues $ 6,322,496 $ 5,828,037 $ 5,092,315 $ 5,412,265 6% Operating Transfers In $ 1,648,622 $ 432,039 $ - $ - 0% Total Other Financing Sources $ 1,648,622 $ 432,039 $ - $ - 0% Total Fund 602 $ 7,971,118 $ 6,260,076 $ 5,092,315 $ 5,412,265 6% Fund 603 - IT Replacement Fund
Investment Earnings $ 138,353 $ 248,493 $ - $ - 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (63,678) 174,489 - - 0% Total Revenues $ 74,675 $ 422,981 $ - $ - 0%
Operating Transfers In $ 3,558,484 $ 3,114, 347 $ 2,856,000 $ 2 ,797, 836 -2% Total Other Financing Sources $ 3,558,484 $ 3,114,347 $ 2,856,000 $ 2,797,836 -2% Total Fund 603 $ 3,633,159 $ 3,537,328 $ 2,856,000 $ 2,797,836 -2%

TOTAL REVENUES $ 211,774,228 $ 221,401,890 $ 225,882,983 $ 218,760,424 -3% TOTAL OTHER SOURCES $ 19,692,987 $ 10,911,380 $ 9,705,994 $ 2,797,836 -71% GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 231,467,215 $ 232,313,270 $ 235,588,977 $ 221,558,260 -6% 38 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
338
Summary of Appropriations by Department/by Category –
All Funds (Excludes CIP)
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Department/Category
FY 22-23
Actuals
FY 23-24
Actuals
FY 24-25
Adopted
Budget
FY 25-26
Proposed
Budget
City Council
Salaries and Benefits $ 675,296 $ 572,515 $ 710,908 $ 790,962 Maintenance and Operations 158,570 178,062 161,181 161,181 Fixed Assets 727 - 2,000 2,000
Subtotal City Council $ 834,594 $ 750,577 $ 874,089 $ 954,143

City Manager’s Office
Salaries and Benefits $ 7, 4 39,768 $ 9,010,354 $ 10,002,380 $ 10,096,235 Maintenance and Operations 4,576,213 7,488,942 4,667,410 4,912,360 Fixed Assets 55,129 100,887 16,900 16,900
Subtotal City Manager’s Office $ 12,071,110 $ 16,600,184 $ 14,686,690 $ 15,025,495

City Attorney
Maintenance and Operations 988,508 977,061 1,086,750 1,123,700 Subtotal City Attorney $ 988,508 $ 977,061 $ 1,086,750 $ 1,123,700

Finance
Salaries and Benefits $ 3,376,822 $ 3,578,893 $ 4,763,134 $ 4,985,872 Maintenance and Operations 955,049 798,210 1,273,330 1,273,330 Fixed Assets 64,339 39,480 37,300 787,300
Subtotal Finance $ 4,396,210 $ 4,416,583 $ 6,073,764 $ 7,046,502

Parks and Community Services
Salaries and Benefits $ 4,792,258 $ 7,058,462 $ 6,520,620 $ 6,594,380 Maintenance and Operations 3,189,239 3,340,631 3,252,945 3,267,4 45 Fixed Assets 28,526 16,647 3,800 3,800
Subtotal Parks and Community Services $ 8,010,022 $ 10,415,740 $ 9,777,365 $ 9,865,625

Information Technology
Salaries and Benefits $ 3,641,655 $ 4,141,132 $ 4,579,074 $ 4,819,929 Maintenance and Operations 568,129 858,650 610,670 1,760,670 Fixed Assets 1,784,178 1,370,904 3,723,977 2,787,953 Subtotal Information Technology $ 5,993,961 $ 6,370,686 $ 8,913,721 $ 9,368,552

Police Department
Salaries and Benefits $ 50,707,995 $ 56,060,741 $ 55,284,339 $ 56,296,324 Maintenance and Operations 5,949,971 6,825,972 6,763,473 6,234,075 Fixed Assets 380,263 1,088,630 993,501 993,216 Subtotal Police Department $ 57,038,230 $ 63,975,342 $ 63,041,313 $ 63,523,615

Fire and Rescue Department
Salaries and Benefits $ 27,878,623 $ 29,489,641 $ 31,904,744 $ 32,985,288 Maintenance and Operations 5,560,602 5,644,516 5,835,188 5,885,188 Fixed Assets 41,171 25,478 32,990 32,990
Subtotal Fire and Rescue Department $ 33,480,396 $ 35,159,635 $ 37,772,922 $ 38,903,466

54 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
339
Summary of Appropriations by Department/by Category –
All Funds (Excludes CIP)
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Department/Category
FY 22-23
Actuals
FY 23-24
Actuals
FY 24-25
Adopted
Budget
FY 25-26
Proposed
Budget
Development Services
Salaries and Benefits $ 7,5 80, 306 $ 8,452,749 $ 9,689,965 $ 9,454,778 Maintenance and Operations 1,622,919 2,113,323 1,961,283 2,000,455 Fixed Assets 50,190 83,403 28,250 28,250
Subtotal Development Services $ 9,253,415 $ 10,649,476 $ 11,679,498 $ 11,483,483

Public Works
Salaries and Benefits $ 10,139,038 $ 11,74 4,853 $ 14,244,933 $ 13,565,635 Maintenance and Operations 14,989,958 16,673,276 15,713,101 16,120,329 Fixed Assets 363,163 724,521 1,942,900 1,478,900 Subtotal Public Works $ 25,492,159 $ 29,142,649 $ 31,900,934 $ 31,164,864

Non-Departmental
Salaries and Benefits $ - $ 1,960,907 $ 2,611,000 $ 4,859,345 Maintenance and Operations 7,952,067 9,070,177 11,291,750 11,565,032 Fixed Assets 24,442,397 14,857,218 12,631,498 2,797,836 Subtotal Non-Departmental $ 32,394,464 $ 25,888,302 $ 26,534,248 $ 19,222,213

TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS - ALL FUNDS

Salaries and Benefits $ 118,182,378 $ 132,070,247 $ 140, 311,097 $ 144,448,7 46 Maintenance and Operations $ 46,511, 225 53,968,821 52,189,891 54,303,765 Fixed Assets $ 27, 210,082 18,307,168 19,413,116 8,929,145

TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS - ALL FUNDS $ 191,903,685 $ 204,346,236 $ 211,914,104 $ 207,681,656 55City of Costa Mesa, California
suMMarIes of
fInancIal data
340
Capital Improvement Program

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM
341

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a summary of the major capital and public improvements to the City’s infrastructure. A capital or public improvement project is defined as expenditures on capital assets with a value greater than $30,000 that are stationary in nature, including but not limited to, publicly owned or operated streets, highways, bridges, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, alleys, storm drains, trees and landscaping, medians, parks, playgrounds, traffic signals, streetlights, fences, walls, or other infrastructure. The CIP also includes other types of capital improvements including those specific to capital facilities, which are defined as city owned or operated buildings including, but not limited to , City Hall, Civic Center, Police Department, Old Corp Yard, fire stations, libraries, Bridge Shelter, and community centers. Al so included within the CIP are consolidated building modification projects. Capital projects differentiate themselves from buildin g modification projects in the dollar amount of the project. Individual building modification projects are minor maintenance improvements capped at $30,000, each respectively. In addition, capital projects have a wider scope of work and can span over multiple fiscal years. In such cases, continuing appropriations are a part of the annual budget to transparently track these multi-year capital projects. Other routine capital purchases, such as the purchase of new vehicles, computer hardware, and other equipment, are accounted for in other special funds, such as the Equipment Replacement Fund and IT Replacement Fund. These are not reflected in the CIP.

The CIP is important for planning an d managing the City’s growth and de velopment as well as maintaining existing infrastructure. The CIP is a living document that continues to evolve each fiscal year through the budgeting process to reflect City Council and communit y goals, needs, and desire s. Planning for capital improvements is an ongoing process. As the City’s infrastructure condition (s) and needs change, capital programs and priorities are adjusted. New construction may be required to accommodate an increased demand or replace aging facilities, while existing infrastructure requires periodic rehabilitation, replacement, or other improvements to protect the City’s investments.

On September 15, 2015, the City Council adopted the Capital Asset Needs (CAN) Ordinance that added Article 8 to Chapter V of Title 2 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code. The Ordinance established the requirement for the City to annually allocate a minimum of five percent (5%) of the General Fund revenue to a capital expenditures account and one and one-half percent (1.5%) of General Fund revenue to a capital facilities account. In the event of an economic downturn, natural disaster, emergency or other unforeseen circumstance, or if the General Fund Operating Reserve falls below the level established by resolution of the City Council pursuant to Section 2-205 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, the City is no t required to comply with the requirements set forth above. Use of such exceptions requires approval by a supermajority of the City Council. In anticipation of revenue shortfall in Fiscal Year 2025-26, Council authorized the Municipal Code § 2-209.2 Emergency exception (a)(2) to be put into effect. Staff will return to City Council during FY 2025-26 mid-year if there are any additional revenues that can be programmed to reinstate deferred projects or consider any new projects.

The FY 2025-26 proposed CIP budget is approximately $28.7 million, across all funds, of which an estimated $12 million will be secured with bond financing for the Fire Station 2 reconstruction. The CIP budget was prepared using a variety of funding sources, which includes actuals, estimated revenues, and fund balances, to maximize the utilization of available funds to maintain, improve, and develop essential City assets. These funding sources also include County, State and Federal grants, many of which are reserved for CIP. There are sufficient fund balances and estimated revenues to support the projects recommended for the FY 2025-26 CIP from the various funding sources. The table below reflects the adopted project expenditures for the CIP as well as the $88.7 million in budgeted funds estimated to carry forward from the prior fiscal year for ongoing capital projects:

TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1-Year CIP $28,743,612
Ongoing CIP (continuing appropriation) $88,667,451
Total Capital Improvement Program $117,411,063

222 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
342

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PR OGRAM (CIP) OVERVIEW

The CIP is organized and summarized by the following sections:

BUDGET GUIDE

The CIP Budget Guide provides a narrative overview of the CIP, including how the program is developed. The guide identifies funding sources and categories of projects. It also reflects various summaries of projects by category, district, and funding source.

CIP ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Included in this CIP section are major project-specific accomplishments from the prior fiscal year.

ONGOING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

The CIP section includes a list of ongoing capital projects that the City Council has authorized to re-budget and carry forward from the prior fiscal year. As the implementation of some capital projects straddle fiscal years, due to complexities of project or other issues, this list is a transparent way to reflect all open projects with their corresponding remaining balance. Ad option of the CIP also provides explicit City Council approval to reappropriate these remaining project balances.

At the March 11, 2025 City Council St udy Session, staff outlined potentia l revenue shortfalls resulting from economic and consumer challenges. Several actions were proposed to address the anticipated deficit, including authorizing the Emergency clause of the Capital Asset Needs Ordinance due to the economic downturn.

At the May 6, 2025 meeting, City Council approved the reduction of the General Fund contribution to the Capital Improvement Fund, therefore several ongoing FY 2024-25 projects were deferred totaling $2.9 million.

PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BY CATEGORY AND CITY COUNCIL GOALS

Best practices recommend that state and local governments establish an objective process for categorizing and prioritizing capital improvement proj ects. The proposed capital projects by category provides a high-level summary of the projects by voting district. The voting district reflects the actual project location; however, some projects may provide a communitywide benefit. The capi tal projects are also classified using the following categories (which are further defined under the Prioritization and Categorization section):

¾ 1 – Risk to Health, Safety or Environment
¾ 2 – Regulatory or Mandated Requirement
¾ 3 – Grant Funding
¾ 4 – Master Plan, General Plan
¾ 5 – Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs

In addition, this summary includes a corresponding project status, defined below:

x New project – projects with this status are not previo usly budgeted projects and represent new financial commitments to fund the projects as well as ongoing operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation costs.

x Existing project – projects with this status are previously budgeted projects that are not completed or span multiple fiscal years and are generally phased. 223City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
343

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

x Ongoing project – projects with this status are ongoing citywide projects that are budgeted every fiscal year in the CIP and relate to annual citywide improvements or maintenance. Examples of projects with this status include Citywide Street Improvements , Citywide Storm Drain Improvements, or Parkway Improvement Program. The project detail forms for these projects will not reflect prior budgets or expenditures as the remaining balances for these projects are reflected on the Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects summary.

This section also reflects how all capital projects tie back to the City Council’s established goals. Each project will meet one or more of the below priorities: [THESE ARE NOT ALL THE GOALS, AND NOT IN ORDER APPROVED BY COUNCIL]

¾ Goal #1: Recruit and Retain High Quality Staff
¾ Goal #2: Achieve Long-term Fiscally Sustainability
¾ Goal #3: Strengthen the Public’s Safety and Improvement Quality of Life ¾ Goal #4: Advance Environmental Sustainability and Climate Resiliency ¾ Goal #5: Diversify, Stabilize and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs

PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS MAP – BY VOTING DISTRICT

A map depicting the geographical location of the capital projects with an overlay reflecting the voting districts is included in this section. The voting districts reflect the actual project location; however, some projects may provide a communitywide benefit. Citywide or “ongoing” projects are not included on this map because they are not specific to any one location or voting district.

PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE The summary of proposed capital projects by funding so urce provides a detailed list of each project and corresponding funding sources for Fiscal Year 2025-26. This summary is organized by the following project types:

x Facilities – projects in this category include any facility maintenance, improvements or reconstruction.

x Parks – projects in this category include any maintenance, improvements, or development at park facilities.

x Streets – projects in this category include any street maintenance (i.e. slurry seal, rehabilitation, etc.), storm drain and water quality related improvements.

x Transportation – projects in this category include any transportation related improvements or maintenance, including active transportation projects, traffic signal maintenance and improvements, and general neighborhood traffic improvements.

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DETAILS

This section provides detailed information about all pr ojects, funding levels, and funding sources. These forms are project-specific and reflect all prior, current, and future project expenditures by phase to provide a total project cost for the City Council and community.

Each project-specific form also includes an estimated financial operating impact for consideration in the budget adoption process that outlines ongoing operation, ma intenance, and rehabilitation costs. These estimates are prepared per project and are subject to change based on fi nal project design and/or construction. Additionally, projects that are classified as “ongoing” do not reflect prior budgets or ex penditures. As such, the remaining balances for these projects are reflected on the Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects summary. 224 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
344

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

The Five-Year CIP also includes a “future” column for projects that are not developed at this time or may be implemented after Fiscal Year 2029-2030. Each fiscal year of the Five-Year CIP includes a realistic cost estimate that is within range of prior year CIP total costs. However, the cost estimates for each project are presented at current value/current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. As a result, the estimates are subject to change.

Additionally, although the schedule span s five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropriated within the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget. The schedule provides a view of upcoming fiscal year capital projects that could be adjusted based on changing City Council and community priorities or financial capabilities. The revised 5-year CIP represents an overall well-balanced, long-term plan reflecting current City Council’s strategic goals and priorities. All projects including those in “future” years remain eligible for any grant funding, should opportunities arise.

CIP GOALS

The CIP is developed based on the City Council and community’s overarching goals. This is specifically reflected in the Adopted Capital Improvement Projects by Catego ry and City Council Goals section. Additionally, the program is developed in accordance with elements in th e City’s General Plan as well as City Council adopted planning documents and master plans.

CIP BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

As part of the annual budget process, the Public Wo rks Department partners with the Finance Department to propose a balanced list of projects that consider the complex workloads associated with each project as well as funding sources and available resources. In collabor ation with the City Manager’s Office, capital projects are reviewed and evaluated by both the Public Works Department and Finance Department to ensure that the City’s priorities, infrastructure needs, financial capacity, and impact the projects have on the City’s operating budget are addressed.

Typically, several projects are identified and requested each year by departments; however, not all of the projects can be funded. An evaluation process is conducted in collaboration with each department to discuss priorities and needs. A list of recommended projects is presented to the City Manager for consideration, and the remaining requested projects that were not recommended are deferred and included in the Five-Year CIP for future consideration.

Additionally, there are a number of capital projects that may be requested and are pending other funding sources, including competitive grants. Projects that may be expecting such competitive grant funding, or funded with other similar outside resources, are not budgeted in the curren t fiscal year until the funding is awarded, but they are referenced in the Five-Year CIP. As a result, throughout the fiscal year, the City Council will receive recommendations to authorize new capital projects and approve budget adjustments to recognize and appropriate the competitively sourced funding.

Once the proposed list is prepared, staff presents the proposed projects at the City Council Study Session, Finance and Pension Advisory Committee, Parks and Community Services Commi ssion, and the Planning Commission for consideration based on their respective purviews. Follo wing their respective reviews and approval, the CIP budget is presented to City Council for consideration and adoption.

225City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
345

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

PRIORITIZATION & CATEGORIZATION

The CIP is updated annually allowing the City to re-evaluate its priorities and needs in each subsequent year based upon the most current revenue projections and projec t priorities. Capital projects affecting public health and safety, and/or legal mandates receive the highest priority. The remaining projects are prioritized for final City Council consideration and adoption by City Council goals, conformanc e to the City’s General Plan and corresponding planning documents and approved master plans, asset conditions, and available grant funding.

The categories aiding in prioritization of these projects are outlined and defined below:

x 1 – Risk to Health, Safety or Environment – projects in this category provide an immediate health or safety concern. These are high priority projects.

x 2 – Regulatory or Mandated Requirement – projects in this category are mandated or in accordance with government regulations. Projects in this category are required and may not be defunded or deferred.

x 3 – Grant Funding – projects in this category generally have competitively sourced funding and are subject to a timeframe outlined in the grant documents. Consequently, deferring these projects may result in forfeiture of grant funding.

x 4 – Master Plan, General Plan – projects in this category are in conformance with the City’s General Plan and related planning documents. They are also projects specifically identified in other approved master plans, such as park-specific master plans, Active Transportation Plan or Parks, Open Space, & Recreation Master Plan.

x 5 – Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs – projects in this category may either be annual recurring extraordinary maintenance costs or one-time/infrequent projects that improve the condition of the City’s assets. Some projects in this category include playground resurfacing and equipment replacement, street rehabilitation or sidewalk and parkway repairs. Some projects in this category may also be categorized as 1 – Risk to Health, Safety or Environment after previously being deferred.

PROJECT ESTIMATES & FUNDING SOURCES

The Public Works Department develops project cost esti mates based on prior experience with similar projects or preliminary designs already completed. The cost estimates for each project are presented at current value/current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. As a result, the estimates are subject to change or escalation, particularly in the outer years of the Five-Year CIP. Occasionally the scope of the project may change resulting in higher costs than the original estimate. This also includes projected operating costs or impacts of the capital projects which are estimated per project and subj ect to change based on fi nal project design and/or construction.

If project costs at the time of bid award are more than budgeted amounts, five options are considered:

x Eliminate the project; or
x Defer the project for consideration du ring future budget processes; or x Re-scope or change the phasing of the projec t to meet the existing approved budget; or x Request City Council to transfer fu nding from another specified project that has savings and/or is a lower priority; or
x Request City Council appropriate additional resources, as necessary, from the respective fund balances.

226 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
346

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

At project completion, any unused funds are returned to the unassigned fund balance for the respective funds.

The City employs a combination of appr oaches to fund its capital projects. The Public Works Department and Finance Department funding recommendations are based upon the most current revenue projections. For many smaller improvement projects, funds are appropriated from available cash on hand. Large-scale capital projects are funded through a variety of methods including long-t erm financing, user fees, proceeds from bond issues, grants, assessments, impact fees, and reserve balances. A list and description of capital project funding sources is provided in the Description of Funds.

CONTINGENCIES & CHANGE ORDERS

A contingency is included within applicable projects as specified on the project detail forms’ cost breakdown.

These amounts allow for budget flexibi lity for unanticipated concerns or cost escalations during the project, including potential change orders.

Change orders are generally the result of additions or deletions to the pr oject, revisions to the project, and omissions or errors in the original project plans and/or specifications. This does not provide budget authority for change orders as City Council would first need to approve a budget adjustment appropriating or transferring the necessary funding.
227City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
347

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
WHAT DID WE DO DURING FISCAL YEAR 2024-25?

SPORT SURFACE LED LIGHTING PROJECT
The lighting at the Jack Hammett Sports Comp lex, TeWinkle Athletic Complex, Costa Mesa Tennis Center, and Bark Park were upgraded from outdated metal halide lighting to new Energy efficient LED lighting. The new lighting was desig ned by Musco Lighting and was site specific given the type of sport played or use, and with guaranteed lighting levels for playability. Musco’s proprietary Ball Tracker technology optimizes visibility of the ball in aerial sports by creating a higher contrast between the ball and the sky which allows athletes to better track the ball and play. The higher contrast is accomplished by pr oviding low level targeted light that is emitted upwards.

In addition to improved playability, the new lighting system is designed to focus light onto the playing surface minimizing light pollution that could affect near by homes as well as birds and critters that rely on darkness to forage for food. Musco lights come with a twenty-five-year warranty that includes parts and labor. Overall, the new lighting will increase efficiency, minimize down time, and will reduce maintenance and energy costs by as much as 85%.

Jack Hammett Sports Complex TeWink le Athletic Complex Costa Mesa Tennis Center 228 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
348

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

COSTA MESA TENNIS CENTER IMPROVEMENTS
This project included the resurfacing of Courts #1 - #10. The court surfaces were leveled, all cracks and joints were repaired and the appropriate SportMaster surfacing (a specific mix of acrylic paint and Silica Sand) was applied for optimum ball speed and playability. The color scheme was updated to provide a more modern and aesthetically pleasing appearance. The highlight of the project included the conversion of two existing Tennis Courts #11 and #12 to eight (8) regulation size pickleball courts with new posts and netting. 229City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
349

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
CLEAN MOBILITY OPTIONS – ON DEMAND TRANSIT
Operation of the Let’s Go Costa Mesa free on-demand ride share service began with a soft launch in October 2024, with full operation commencing in November 2024. The service provides fare- free on demand point to point trips anywhere within the service area which consists of Westside Costa Mesa and College Park south of Joann Street and the area surrounding the East 17th Street shopping district bounded by East 18th Street in the north and East 16th Street in the south.

The innovative project is intended to increase cl ean energy transportation options to residents with limited or no access to personal auto mobile, and increase access to employment, educational, recreational, civic and other resources. The service is available to all residents and visitors via a mobile app or phone number and includes service 7 days a week 355 days a year with three electric vehicles.
230 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
350

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

CITYWIDE BICYCLE WAYFINDING
Construction on the Bicycle Wa yfinding Project started in late 2024. The completed project includes the installation of 116 new bicycle wayfinding signs throughout the City in the Westside, Eastside, College Park, Mesa Del Mar, Mesa North, Mesa Verde, SoBeca, and South Coast Metro neighborhoods. The wayfinding si gns are designed to complement the rapid implementation of the 2018 Active Transportation Plan and Masterplan of Bikeways.

The wayfinding signs help cyclists navigate their way through the City, as well as encourage new bicycle riders by highlighting the ease of reac hing City destinations by bicycle. The project included community engagement for sign design, developing a hierarchy of community destinations, and sign placement locations.
231City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
351

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
LIONS PARK CAFÉ MESA
The Lions Park Café Mesa is a new City facility that will provide park goers a location to purchase food and coffee beverages. Construction is currently underway creating a local attraction featuring a walk-up concession counter. The facility will provide the operator the necessary kitchen equipment to serve hot and cold food and beverages. The facility includes a food prep area, cold and dry storage, a dish washing station, staff restroom, storage room, and commercial grade kitchen equipment.

The Café is Phase 3 of The Lions Park Projects and features wood decking, perimeter seating within the Lions Park campus and compliments th e Donald Dungan Library and Norma Hertzog Community Center which were constructed as Phases 1 and 2 of the project. The café is located north of the library and west of the event lawn, adjacent to the Downtown Recreation Center. 232 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
352

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

ADAMS AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
This street improvement project is on Adams Avenue between the Santa Ana River to Royal Palm Drive, as well as along Royal Palm Drive from Adams Avenue to Elm Avenue. Street pavement rehabilitation included removal and reconstruction of damaged pavement sections and grinding and overlaying with new asphalt. Improved bi cycle facilities were installed with green conflict zones that included highly visible crosswalks at major intersections. These striping improvements are consistent with the City’s Active Tr ansportation Plan (ATP) in achieving connectivity and expanding the City’s growing bicycle networks.

This project was financed through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds. In addition, this was the first project to be administered by the City’s Community Workforce Agreement (CWA). The goal of the CWA is to develop opportunities for qualified locally hired individuals and veterans for co nstruction of the City’s various Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs).
233City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
353

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

ADAMS AVENUE AND PINECREEK DRIVE INTERSECTION MULTIMODAL

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
In accordance with the City’s approved Active Tr ansportation Plan, the intersection of Adams Avenue and Pinecreek Drive was upgraded wit h innovative pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements at the primary entrance to Orange Coast College, one of the city’s busiest bicycle and pedestrian crossings.

The project removed two automob ile free-right (slip lanes) in order to allow for bicycle and pedestrian mobility improvements including a new crosswalk, high visibility crosswalk striping, new pedestrian sidewalks, and new Class I off-street bicycle trails.

Green paint and other enhancements improve visibi lity and better serve mo torists, pedestrians, and cyclists at the highly traveled intersecti on. The new Class I paths on the northeast and southwest corners of the intersection enable safe access for bicycle and pedestrian traffic navigating the intersection. This project maintained car travel lanes on Adams Avenue, provided new roadway paving, a realigned median, traffi c improvements, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements.
234 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
354
High
Priority
Const./
Impl.

Restr.

Funds No. Proj # Project Name Budget Actuals
Remaining
Balance
9 1 200013 Fire Station #2 Reconstruction 3,150,000 204,173 2,945,827 9 2 200017 PD Carpet Replacement 653,200 2,379 650,821 99 3 200040 HVAC Replacement at Various Facilities 1,030,000 407,707 622,293 9 4 200062 Building Maintenance Projects 3,881,136 3,608,671 272,465 99 5 200072 Fire Station #1 Dehumidifier Install 250,000 67,984 182,016 9 6 200080 City Hall Training Room 589,000 74,005 514,995 9 7 200097 Electric Vehicle Fleet and Infrastructure 484,368 277,843 206,525 9 8 200099 Finance Security & Efficiency Reconfiguration 305,000 60,841 244,159 99 9 200102 Fire Station 3 Fuel Tank Replacement 275,000 24,466 250,534 99 10 210004 Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Stations 602,000 455,221 146,779 9 11 210012 City Hall-Paint, Carpet & Misc. Improvements 500,000 290,391 209,609 999 12 210013 Fire Station 4 Training Tower & Grounds Reconstruction 5,315,000 2,347,133 2,967,867 99 13 210015 Police Dept - Emergency Comm Facilities Remodel 1,230,000 101,160 1,128,840 9 14 210016 Police Dept - Parking Lot Reconfiguration 203,500 101,749 101,751 15 210019 City Hall 5th Floor Air Handler Replacement 140,000 - 140,000 16 210021 City Hall Heater(s) Replacement 350,000 - 350,000 99 17 210022 CM Housing James St. / 18th St. Property Improv. 140,000 - 140,000 99 18 210023 Facilities Needs & Assessment Study 330,000 - 330,000 9 19 210024 NHCC- AV System Repair & Upgrade 55,000 - 55,000 99 20 210025 NHCC- Roof Replacement 334,136 5,202 328,934 9 21 210026 Police Dept - Locker Rooms Remodel 400,000 - 400,000 9 22 210027 Police Dept - Weather Proofing 350,000 - 350,000 99 23 210028 City Hall and Communication Generators Replacement 700,000 - 700,000 999 24 300090 Safe Route to School Grant Project 788,090 - 788,090 99 25 300148 Citywide Bicycle Rack Improvements 250,000 71,518 178,482 99 26 300163 Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements 762,800 676,145 86,655 9 27 300169 Newport Blvd Improvement - Victoria /22nd to 19th 1,178,820 94,496 1,084,324 9 28 300171 SB Newport Blvd Improvement (Mesa to Victoria) 1,965,652 97,040 1,868,612 99 29 300172 Pavement Mitigation I -405 Project 661,980 - 661,980 9 30 300173 Newport Blvd Improvement NB (22nd to Bristol) &SB (Bristol to Mesa)
2,134,145 94,186 2,039,959
9 99 31 300174 Adams at Pinecreek Improvements 3,592,953 2,575,805 1,017,148

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects
Remaining Balances as of 05/07/2025

TOTAL ALL FUNDS
235City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
355
High
Priority
Const./
Impl.

Restr.

Funds No. Proj # Project Name Budget Actuals
Remaining
Balance

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects
Remaining Balances as of 05/07/2025

TOTAL ALL FUNDS
99 32 300177 Westside Street Improvements- Wilson Street 257,000 - 257,000 99 33 300178 Sunflower Ave Rehabilitation Project 2,570,782 - 2,570,782 99 34 300179 Adams Ave Active Transportation Project 3,750,000 142,500 3,607,500 9 35 300180 Bicycle Safety Education- 16 Schools 150,000 37,529 112,471 9 36 300181 Fairview Road Improvement Project 3,216,116 34,500 3,181,616 9 37 300182 Fairview Rd Rehab (RMRA) Project 2,780,829 - 2,780,829 99 38 300184 Traffic Signal at Fairview Rd and Belfast 600,000 10,964 589,036 99 39 300185 Harbor, 17th & Gisler Rehab (RMRA) Project 3,500,000 - 3,500,000 99 40 300186 Clean Mobility - On Demand Transit Services 500,000 221,097 278,903 9 41 300187 Fairview Road Improvement Fair to Adams 300,000 - 300,000 99 42 300188 Signal Modern Multi Modal Sa fety Improvements 4,340,100 66,585 4,273,515 43 350030 Westside Restoration Project 765,000 242,586 522,414 99 44 350031 South Coast Drive Wall Repairs 709,316 127,813 581,503 99 45 350032 Tree Planting & Small Care Program 150,000 94,301 55,699 99 46 370010 Mesa Del Mar Multimodal Access 300,000 11,465 288,535 9 47 370042 Bus Shelter Improvement 300,000 - 300,000 9 48 370058 Citywide Traffic Signal Improvements 100,000 - 100,000 99 49 400012 Citywide Alley Improvements 3,235,000 1,395,888 1,839,112 999 50 400015 Citywide Street Improvements 45,045,940 31,289,269 13,756,671 99 51 450010 Citywide Cla ss II, III and IV Bicycle Projects 1,220,461 1,069,882 150,579 99 52 450013 Adams Ave Multi-Purpose Trail 565,796 243,172 322,624 99 53 450014 Adams Ave Bicycle Facility Project 2,632,547 228,903 2,403,644 99 54 450015 Bicycle/Pedestrian Infras tructure Improvements 700,000 86,039 613,961 9 55 450016 Mesa/Santa Ana Bicycle Facility Improvements 100,000 - 100,000 9 56 450017 MV/Peterson Pl Class II Bicycle Facility 100,000 - 100,000 99 57 500009 New Sidewalk / Missing Link Program 991,525 691,525 300,000 99 58 500010 Parkway Maintenance Program Citywide 1,791,243 645,599 1,145,644 9 59 500017 Priority Sidewalk Repair 465,000 274,729 190,271 99 60 550011 Citywide Storm Drain Improvements - Fairview Park Storm 353,055 - 353,055 999 61 550011 Citywide Storm Drain Improvements 2,395,842 1,516,189 879,653 99 62 550022 Westside Storm Drain Improvements 1,600,000 166,835 1,433,165 236 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
356
High
Priority
Const./
Impl.

Restr.

Funds No. Proj # Project Name Budget Actuals
Remaining
Balance

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects
Remaining Balances as of 05/07/2025

TOTAL ALL FUNDS
99 63 550023 Placentia Ave. Stormwater Quality Trash Full-Capture System 625,000 2,355 622,645 999 64 700027 TeWinkle Park - Skate Park Expansion 2,170,000 129,565 2,040,435 99 65 700054 Westside Park Development 250,000 - 250,000 9 66 700080 Park Security Lighting Replacement 299,880 288,090 11,790 9 67 700106 Various Parks - Sidewalk Replacement 64,686 - 64,686 68 700111 Various Parks Rehab Parking Lots 70,000 - 70,000 9 69 700115 Jack Hammett Sport Complex Field Upgrade 309,263 106,056 203,207 9 70 700128 Park Sidewalk Accessibility Program 290,000 112,468 177,533 999 71 700129 Shalimar Park Improvements 250,000 21,882 228,118 999 72 700132 Fairview Park - Vernal Pool Restoration 407,366 304,684 102,682 9 73 700133 Canyon Park Inventory Management & Restoration 60,000 - 60,000 9 74 700134 Fairview Park Fence Sign Trail 300,000 8,126 291,874 99 75 700135 Fairview Park Master Plan Update 389,565 236,713 152,852 999 76 700137 TeWinkle Park Lakes Repairs 2,132,475 143,553 1,988,922 999 77 700139 Ketchum-Libolt Park Expansion 2,497,520 147,008 2,350,512 99 78 700140 Costa Mesa Tennis Center Improvements 620,000 603,859 16,141 9 79 700141 Costa Mesa Country Club Modernization 350,000 - 350,000 99 80 700142 Brentwood Park Improvements 650,000 - 650,000 9 81 700144 Fairview Park-Pump Station & Westlands Recirculation System 655,000 73,873 581,127 999 82 700145 Shalimar Park Expansion 2,000,000 74,259 1,925,741 83 700146 Various Parks - Playground Repair and Replacement 150,000 140,300 9,700 9 84 700147 CM Country Club Cart Path & Ground Improvements 300,000 60,346 239,654 9 85 700148 Balearic Community Center Blacktop Improvements 150,000 - 150,000 99 86 700149 Fairview Park Educational Hubs and Signage 90,000 5,185 84,815 99 87 700150 Fairview Park Mesa Restoration/Cultural Resource Preservation CA- ORA- 58
2,000,000 88,923 1,911,077
99 88 700151 Fairview Park West Bluff Stabilize & Restoration 2,000,000 36,331 1,963,669 9 89 700154 Golf Course & Tennis Center Improvements 1,200,000 209,277 990,723 9 90 700155 Jack Hammett SC Relevel and Restore Fields 1 and 2 400,000 - 400,000 99 91 700157 TeWinkle Batting Cage Structure & Other Improv. 325,000 15,990 309,011 99 92 800029 EOC Equipment Update 150,000 33,648 116,352 9 93 800031 Westside Police Sub-Station Improvements 911,125 - 911,125 237City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
357
High
Priority
Const./
Impl.

Restr.

Funds No. Proj # Project Name Budget Actuals
Remaining
Balance

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects
Remaining Balances as of 05/07/2025

TOTAL ALL FUNDS
9 99 94 800032 Lion Park Café 2,300,000 1,783,782 516,218 9 95 800035 Senior Center- HVAC Replacement 725,000 - 725,000 99 96 800036 Senior Center Roof and Roof Cap Replacement 350,000 - 350,000 Total Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects 143,529,212$ 54,861,761$ 88,667,451$ 238 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
358
No. Project Name Category
Dist.

No.
1 Building Modification Projects 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs All 2 Civic Center - Miscellaneous Repairs 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 3 3 Fire Station 2 Reconstruction 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 2 4 Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Fire Stations 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 5 Citywide Tree Maintenance (in Public Right-of-Way) 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 6 Jack Hammett Sports Complex - Field Restoration 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 3 7 Park Parking Lot and Playground Rehabilitation 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs All 8 Park Security Lighting Replacement 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 9 Park Sidewalk Replacement 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 10 Citywide Street Improvements 4 - Master Plan, General Plan All 11 Harbor Boulevard Rehabilitation Project (RMRA) 4 - Master Plan, General Plan 1,2 12 Parkway & Medians Improvement Program 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 13 Westside Street Improvements - Wilson Street 3 - Grant Funding 5 14 Adams Avenue Active Transportation Improvements -
Multipurpose Trails 3 - Grant Funding 1
15 Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility Project from Fairview to Harbor 3 - Grant Funding 2,3
16 Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Improvements 4 - Master Plan, General Plan All 17 Center Street Pedestrian Crossing and Circulation
Improvements 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 4 18 Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 19 Clean Mobility Options Program - On-Demand Transit
Services 3 - Grant Funding 4,5,6
20 Fairview Road Active Transportation Improvements - Fair Drive to Adams Avenue 3 - Grant Funding 3
21 New Sidewalk/Missing Link Program 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 22 Pedestrian Safety Festival 3 - Grant Funding 5
23 Priority Sidewalk Repair 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 239City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
359
Quality
Recruitment
Fiscal
Sustainability
Safe
Community
Environmental
Sustainability
Housing
Commitments
Fiscal Year
2025-2026
99 150,000$
9 99 50,000$
9999 12,000,000$
9 99 50,000$
99 200,000$
9 100,000$
9 100,000$
99 75,000$
9 75,000$
99 4,100,000$
9 2,951,612$
9 125,000$
9 230,000$
99 4,223,000$
99 850,000$
99 250,000$
99 50,000$
9 100,000$
99 500,000$
99 1,999,000$
99 100,000$
99 400,000$
99 65,000$
28,743,612$

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Capital Improvement Projects
By Category and City Council Goals
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
240 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
360

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Map by Voting District

1 1 Citywide projects that are not specifically defined and/or larger projects (i.e. Westside projects) are not geographically displayed above as they are not specific to any one location or district. 241City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
361
Gas Tax
(HUTA)
Fund
CDBG
Fund
Traffic
Impact Fee
Fund
Cannabis
Traffic
Impact Fees
Fund
No. 201 207 214 240
1 Building Modification Projects
2 Civic Center - Miscellaneous Repairs
3 Fire Station 2 Reconstruction
4 Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Fire Stations TOTAL FACILITIES -$ -$ -$ -$ Next Category
5 Citywide Tree Maintenance (in Public Right-of-Way) 200,000$ 6 Jack Hammett Sports Complex - Field Restoration
7 Park Parking Lot and Playground Rehabilitation
8 Park Security Lighting Replacement
9 Park Sidewalk Replacement
TOTAL PARKS 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ Next Category
10 Citywide Street Improvements 600,000$
11 Harbor Boulevard Rehabilitation Project (RMRA)
12 Parkway & Medians Improvement Program 75,000$
13 Westside Street Improvements - Wilson Street 230,000$ TOTAL STREETS 675,000$ 230,000$ -$ -$ Next Category
14 Adams Avenue Active Transportation Improvements - Multipurpose Trails 15 Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility Project from Fairview to Harbor 200,000$ 16 Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Improvements 100,000$ 150,000$ 17 Center Street Pedestrian Crossing and Circulation Improvements 18 Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements
19 Clean Mobility Options Program - On-Demand Transit Services 20 Fairview Road Active Transportation Improvements - Fair Drive to Adams Avenue 120,000$ 21 New Sidewalk/Missing Link Program 100,000$
22 Pedestrian Safety Festival
23 Priority Sidewalk Repair 65,000$
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 165,000$ -$ 420,000$ 150,000$ Next Category
1,040,000$ 230,000$ 420,000$ 150,000$ Total One-Year Capital Improvement Projects

TRANSPORTATION

STREETS
PARKS

FACILITIES
Category/Project Title
242 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
362
Gas Tax
(RMRA)
Fund
Capital
Improve.

Fund
Measure M2
Fairshare
Fund
Jack
Hammett
Fund
Grant Fund Future Bond/
Financing
251 401 416 417 230/231/232 Total
150,000$ 150,000$
50,000$ 50,000$
12,000,000$ 12,000,000$
50,000$ 50,000$
-$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 12,000,000$ 12,250,000$ 200,000$
100,000$ 100,000$
100,000$ 100,000$
75,000$ 75,000$
75,000$ 75,000$
-$ 250,000$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 550,000$ 1,500,000$ 2,000,000$ 4,100,000$
2,951,612$ 2,951,612$
50,000$ 125,000$
230,000$
2,951,612$ 1,500,000$ 2,050,000$ -$ -$ -$ 7,406,612$ 4,223,000$ 4,223,000$
650,000$ 850,000$
250,000$
50,000$ 50,000$
100,000$ 100,000$
500,000$ 500,000$
120,000$ 1,759,000$ 1,999,000$
100,000$
400,000$ 400,000$
65,000$
-$ 150,000$ 770,000$ -$ 6,882,000$ -$ 8,537,000$ 2,951,612$ 2,150,000$ 2,820,000$ 100,000$ 6,882,000$ 12,000,000$ 28,743,612$

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Capital Improvement Projects by Funding Source
Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26
243City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
363
Building Modification Projects Item No. 1
Type Facilities CIP Project No. 200062
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,150,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
150,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,150,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,150,000$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-200062

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

The attached summary of proposed maintenance projects are building modifications and maintenance projects in the 23 City-owned buildings and parks, including those leased to outside agencies. The City administers and supervises contract services for maintaining these facilities.

Building Modification Projects consolidates many smaller projects that are minor maintenance and repair-related (i.e. painting, electrical, repair, etc.) amounting to $30,000 or less.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Capital Improvement Fund
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
244 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
364
Item No. 1
No. Project Title/Location Cost Description
1 Bridge Shelter $ 25,000 Plumbing
2 Balearic Community Center $ 19,000 Roof access ladder and hatch replacement 3 Donald Dungan Library $ 24,000 Roof repair
4 Norma Hertzog Community Center $ 10,000 Lighting inverter batteries replacement 5 Police Department $ 22,000 Chill water treatment 6 Various Parks $ 25,000 Purchase of expanded metal picnic tables 7 Various Parks $ 25,000 Restroom Paint (Del Mesa, Lions, Vista, TeWinkle, Shiffer) GRAND TOTAL 150,000$

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Building Modification Projects
245City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
365
Civic Center - Miscellaneous Repairs Item No. 2
Type Facilities CIP Project No. 210012
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 1 of 7 District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 800,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
50,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 800,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 800,000$ Location: Civic Center Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-210012

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

Annual repair and maintenance at Civic Center building consisting of painting, carpet replacement, and ongoing improvements.

Repair and replacement of worn and damaged areas at Civic Center. Areas within Civic Center experiencing high levels of wear and tear need to be replaced, such as carpeting and painting. This also funds minor reconfiguration of office spaces to accommodate new staff.

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 2,400,000$ 12,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 14,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,150,000$ 12,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,150,000$ 2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
12,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,150,000$ 12,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,150,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 155,423$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 15,150,000$ Location: Fire Station 2 Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-TBD-19500-50910-200013

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs Existing Project Demolition and reconstruction of Fire Station 2
Fire Station 2 has served the community for several decades and has exceeded its useful life. This Fire Station is no longer effective for current operational needs due to mechanical, electrical, and plumbing deficiencies. Funding is requested for the construction phase of this project.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Future Bond 1
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Total Funding Sources
None
247City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
367
Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Fire Stations Item No. 4 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 210004
Department: Fire Dept's Priority #: (3 of 5) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 500,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
50,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 500,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 379,004$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 500,000$ Location: Fire Station 1-6 Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-210004

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

Minor and continuous projects at various fire stations (1-6) Aging facilities at the City's five fire stations require annual maintenance, upgrades and improvements. Typical upgrades include restroom fixtures, electrical, lighting, plumbing and life safety facilities and other repairs as needed. This project provides needed funding to ensure continuing operations at all facilities.

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,200,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,200,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,200,000$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19500-40111-202601

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment New Project
Citywide maintenance of parkway and median trees.

Providing enhanced maintenance to median and parkway trees within public right-of-way that are susceptible to the effects of unprecedented weather events will reduce the occurrence of limb and whole tree failure.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
Total Funding Sources
None
249City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
369
Jack Hammett Sports Complex - Field Restoration Item No. 6 Type Parks CIP Project No. 700155
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
400,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 106,056$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 500,000$ Location: Jack Hammett Sports Complex Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-417-19500-40111-700155

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment Existing Project Re-level and restore the turf on Fields 1 and 2 at the Jack Hammett Sports Complex Over the years, the fields have deteriorated due to natural soil settling, regular use, and special events. This project will regrade the fields to enhance both safety and playability.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Jack Hammett Fund
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
250 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
370
Park Parking Lot and Playground Rehabilitation Item No. 7 Type Parks CIP Project No. 700146
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 650,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 650,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
100,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 650,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 650,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 650,000$ Location: Various Parks Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-40111-700146

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

Resurface parking lots and replace playground equipment at various park locations.

This project will rehabilitate and repair deteriorating asphalt and faded striping in parking lots across multiple park sites. It will also replace missing or separated rubber surfacing and remove damaged, worn, or unsafe playground equipment. These improvements will eliminate potential hazards, ensuring safer and more accessible play areas for park visitors Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Capital Improvement Fund
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
251City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
371
Park Security Lighting Replacement Item No. 8
Type Parks CIP Project No. 700080
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ 975,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ 975,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
75,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ 975,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ 975,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 975,000$ Location: Various Parks Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19200-40112-700080

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

This project will replace the existing metal halide lighting at various parks with solar powered LED lighting.

The installation of an advanced lighting system will significantly improve visibility, reduce incidents of vandalism, and generate long- term energy savings.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Capital Improvement Fund
Total Funding Sources
None
252 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
372
Park Sidewalk Replacement Item No. 9
Type Parks CIP Project No. 700106
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 450,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 450,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 450,000$ Location: Various Parks Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-40111-700106

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

Remove and replace sidewalks at various park locations.

This project would replace cracked, raised or buckled concrete in walkways on various parks, eliminating potential hazards due to unsafe walking conditions.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Capital Improvement Fund
Total Funding Sources
None
253City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
373
Citywide Street Improvements Item No. 10
Type Streets CIP Project No. 400015
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 1 of 7 District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,100,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 39,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,100,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 39,100,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
600,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 6,100,000$ 1,500,000$ 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,000,000$ 6,500,000$ 2,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 2,500,000$ 13,000,000$ 26,500,000$ -$ 4,100,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 39,100,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 39,100,000$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19200-30112-400015
500000-401-19200-30112-400015
500000-416-19200-30112-400015

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4 - Master Plan, General Plan Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

Rehabilitation of streets that include by one or a combination of the following methods: grind & overlay, leveling course and slurry seal, and reconstruction of structurally deficient areas.

This program provides major rehabilitation to streets and is implemented in accordance with the Pavement Management System to meet the City Council goal to reach and maintain an average Citywide Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 85.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
Capital Improvement Fund
Measure M2 Fairshare Fund
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
254 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
374
Harbor Boulevard Rehabilitation Project (RMRA) Item No. 11 Type Streets CIP Project No. 202602
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 1 of 7 District No. 1,2 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,951,612$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,951,612$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,951,612$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,951,612$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
2,951,612$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,951,612$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,951,612$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,951,612$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 2,951,612$ Location: Harbor (MacArthur/SC & Gisler/Baker) Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-251-19200-71200-202602

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4 - Master Plan, General Plan New Project
Street rehabilitation along Harbor Blvd. (MacArthur Blvd. to South Coast Dr.) & (Gisler Ave. to Baker St.) This street improvement project will be funded with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds. RMRA is a program that provides funding or major rehabilitation of City streets that are in need of improvement. Striping, markings, and bicycle facilities will be consistent with the City's Active Transportation Plan (ATP).

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Gas Tax (RMRA) Fund
Ins
Total Funding Sources
None
255City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
375
Parkway & Medians Improvement Program Item No. 12
Type Streets CIP Project No. 500010
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 2 of 7 District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ 200,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 1,025,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ 200,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 1,025,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 450,000$ -$ 75,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 275,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ 200,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 1,025,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,025,000$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19200-30130-500010
500000-416-19200-30130-500010

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

Reconstruction of damaged curb, gutter, ramps, sidewalks, and median landscape and irrigation.

Permanently repair damaged areas of the right-of-way and ADA accessibility improvements and replace existing median landscape and irrigation improvements with drought-tolerant landscaping that includes California native plants and state-of-the-art irrigation systems.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
Capital Improvement Fund
Measure M2 Fairshare Fund
Total Funding Sources
None
256 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
376
Westside Street Improvements - Wilson Street Item No. 13 Type Streets CIP Project No. 300177
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 2 of 2 District No. 5 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 257,000$ 230,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 487,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 257,000$ 230,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 487,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
257,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 257,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 230,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 230,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 257,000$ 230,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 487,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 487,000$ Location: Wilson St. from Placentia Ave. to Pacific Ave. Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-207-19200-30130-300177

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 - Grant Funding New Project
Westside Street Improvements on Wilson Street
Street and parkway rehabilitation for Wilson Street in the Westside neighborhood consisting of grind and overlay and / or slurry seal.

The limits of improvement for Wilson Street is from Placentia Ave. to Pacific Ave. and will be partially funded through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
AQMD Fund
CDBG Fund
Total Funding Sources
None
257City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
377
Adams Avenue Active Transportation Improvements - Multipurpose Trails Item No. 14 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 450013
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 1 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 565,796$ 4,223,000$ 4,777,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,565,796$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 565,796$ 4,223,000$ 4,777,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,565,796$ 2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
565,796$ -$ 1,377,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,942,796$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000$ -$ 2,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,200,000$ 4,223,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,223,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 565,796$ 4,223,000$ 4,777,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,565,796$ Funds Expended to Date: 153,826$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 9,565,796$ Location: District 1 Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19300-30225-450013
500000-230-19300-30225-450013

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 - Grant Funding Existing Project
The Adams Avenue Active Transportation Improvements – Multipurpose Trails project will construct Class I Multi-use paths along Adams Avenue from the Santa Ana River to Royal Palm Drive. Proposed improvements include curb extensions with new curb and gutter, signing and striping, new medians, median modifications, landscaping and irrigation, streetlighting relocations, utility relocations and adjustments, and traffic signal modifications. The project will enhance accessibility and safety for bicyclists and pedestrians by providing separation from vehicles. The project will connect to the future Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility Project from Harbor Boulevard to Fairview Road and also to the recently constructed Class IV Cycle Track on Placentia Avenue.

The City received a competitive federal grant for construction funds of this project. This project is in accordance with the City's General Plan and the Active Transportation Plan. The project is in the design phase. The project will improve pedestrian and bicycle mobility and access in the area.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
AQMD Fund
Capital Improvement Fund
Measure M2 Fairshare Fund
Federal Grant
Total Funding Sources
None
258 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
378
Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility Project from Fairview to Harbor Item No. 15 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 450014
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 2,3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 211,674$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 211,674$ 2,420,873$ 850,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,270,873$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,632,547$ 850,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,482,547$ 2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
752,547$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 952,547$ 45,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ 75,000$ 650,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 725,000$ 1,760,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,760,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,632,547$ 850,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,482,547$ Funds Expended to Date: 184,657$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 3,482,547$ Location: Districts 2 and 3 Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-214-19300-30210-450014
500000-401-19300-30210-450014
500000-416-19300-30210-450014
500000-230-19300-30210-450014

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 - Grant Funding Existing Project
This project will implement Class II buffered bike lanes and Class IV cycle tracks along Adams Avenue from Harbor Boulevard to Fairview Road. This project includes median modifications, pavement slurry seal, landscaping and irrigation, and signing and striping, as well as intersection modifications at the intersection of Adams Avenue and Fairview Road. The project will complement and tie into the recently constructed Adams Avenue and Pinecreek Drive Intersection Project.

The City received a competitive federal grant for construction for Active Transportation improvements. This project is in accordance with the City's General Plan and the Active Transportation Plan. The project is in the pre-construction phase. The project will improve pedestrian and bicycle mobility and access in the area.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Traffic Impact Fee Fund
Capital Improvement Fund
Measure M2 Fairshare Fund
Federal Grant
Total Funding Sources
None
259City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
379
Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Improvements Item No. 16 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 450015
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 1,200,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ -$ -$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 1,200,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,200,000$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-214-19300-30225-450015
500000-240-19300-30225-450015

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4 - Master Plan, General Plan Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

Citywide bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements to implement the Active Transportation Plan and the Pedestrian Master Plan.

Increase access and mobility and improve safety for bicyclists and pedestrians.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Traffic Impact Fee Fund
Cannabis Traffic Impact Fees Fund
Total Funding Sources
None
260 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
380
Center Street Pedestrian Crossing and Circulation Improvements Item No. 17 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 202603
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 4 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ 2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 550,000$ Location: District 4 Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19300-30225-260003

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment New Project
The project will design and construct a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK Signal) at the intersection of Center Street and Placentia Avenue with a high visibility pedestrian crosswalk. The project will also evaluate options to increase parking along Center Street through changes to the circulation in the area. Proposed improvements include a raised concrete bulb-out, signing and striping improvements and traffic signal modifications to coordinate the HAWK signal with the adjacent signal at Placentia Avenue and W. 19th Street. The project will enhance the safety and accessibility for pedestrians crossing the intersection.

The project will enhance the safety and accessibility for pedestrians crossing the intersection of Center Street and Placentia Avenue and is consistent with the City's goals of enhancing safety and accessibility for all users. The project will also evaluate options and may implement improvements to increase the parking supply in an area that is heavily parking impacted. For the 2025-26 fiscal year, funding for the design and community outreach is included. Construction funding will be requested in 2026-27 fiscal year.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Traffic Impact Fee Fund
Gas Tax (RMRA) Fund
Capital Improvement Fund
Measure M2 Fairshare Fund
Total Funding Sources
None
261City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
381
Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements Item No. 18
Type Transportation CIP Project No. 300163
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 600,000$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19300-30241-300163

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

This project includes ongoing citywide implementation of neighborhood traffic improvements including signs, approved speed humps, flashing beacons, vehicle speed feedback signs, and other improvements to enhance the neighborhood character.

The project will enhance citywide neighborhood character and improve neighborhood traffic circulations for all modes of transportation.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Capital Improvement Fund
Total Funding Sources
None
262 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
382
Clean Mobility Options Program - On-Demand Transit Services Item No. 19 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 300186
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 4,5,6 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,800,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,800,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
500,000$ 500,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,800,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,800,000$ Location: Districts 4, 5, 6 Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-232-19300-30241-300186

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 - Grant Funding Existing Project
This project will provide funds to create and operate an “on-demand” transit services with an all-electric vehicle fleet to primarily disadvantaged and low-income communities west of Newport Boulevard. The service area in Costa Mesa will include key destinations including healthcare, transportation hubs, grocery, senior living facilities, and other destinations. The proposed initial operating plan would have a total of three electric vehicles operating up to 10 hours per day, 7 days a week, with adjustments made based on feedback from the community and service data to best align with the needs of the community.

The CMO Pilot Program is a statewide initiative that provides voucher-based funding for zero-emission carsharing, innovative transit services, and on-demand ride services in California’s historically underserved communities. The City received $1.5 million in funding to create and implement an on-demand shuttle pilot program for areas designated as Disadvantaged or Low-Income to provide transit connections to OCTA bus routes, grocery stores, shopping, and job centers in Costa Mesa.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Blank Grant 10
Total Funding Sources
None
263City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
383
Fairview Road Active Transportation Improvements - Fair Drive to Adams Avenue Item No. 20 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 300187
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 1,999,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,999,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 1,999,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,299,000$ 2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120,000$ 24,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,000$ 100,000$ 120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 176,000$ 1,759,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,935,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 1,999,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,299,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 2,299,000$ Location: District 3 Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-214-19300-30225-300187
500000-401-19300-30225-300187
500000-416-19300-30225-300187
500000-230-19300-30225-300187

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 - Grant Funding Existing Project
The project will design and construct active transportation improvements along Fairview Road from Adams Avenue to Fair Drive.

Proposed improvements include improved bicycle facilities, green bicycle conflict zone striping, high visibility pedestrian crossings, pedestrian upgrades, transit stop improvements and traffic signal modifications.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Traffic Impact Fee Fund
Capital Improvement Fund
Measure M2 Fairshare Fund
Federal Grant
Total Funding Sources
None
264 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
384
New Sidewalk/Missing Link Program Item No. 21
Type Transportation CIP Project No. 500009
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 3 of 7 District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19200-30130-500009

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

This program includes the construction of new sidewalk at locations where short segments are missing.

This program allows for the construction of new sidewalk mid-block where short segments are missing to provide a continuous path of travel or for entire blocks at or near high priority areas, such as around schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, public facilities, bus routes, and major highways.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
Total Funding Sources
None
265City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
385
Pedestrian Safety Festival Item No. 22
Type Transportation CIP Project No. 202604
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 5 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 2024-25 and
Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 400,000$ Location: District 5 Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-230-19300-30225-202604

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 - Grant Funding New Project
The project will develop and implement a Pedestrian Safety Festival that will include a temporary weekend closure of the 750’ stretch of Harbor Boulevard between Newport Boulevard and West 19th Street to automobiles. The festival which will occur on 4 weekends over the course of one year will open the space to pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-automobile users in a plaza-like space that showcases the potential of the primary corridor in Costa Mesa’s central business district to be thought of as a space for all people including those outside of cars. The festival will include various activities and a primary focus on the importance of pedestrian safety.

The project encourages non-automobile mobility in the community and improves safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. This project will be funded by a United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Safe Roads and Streets for All (SS4A) Grant.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Federal Grant
Total Funding Sources
None
266 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
386
Priority Sidewalk Repair Item No. 23
Type Transportation CIP Project No. 500017
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 2 of 7 District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
-$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$
-$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$
65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 390,000$ -$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$
-$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$
-$ 65,000 $ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 390,000$ 2024-25
and Prior
Proposed
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Future Total
65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 390,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$ 65,000 $ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 390,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 390,000$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19200-30130-500017

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

This project is an ongoing maintenance program to remove and replace damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk.

A sidewalk maintenance program is essential to remove and replaced damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk. This program is intended to provide funds to repair the damaged concrete improvements within the City right-of-way. These funds will be used to perform the necessary parkway repairs where staff has been directed to remove trees by the Parks & Community Services Commission (PACS). Additionally, ADA accessibility ramps are constructed as staff receives individual requests.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
Total Funding Sources
None
267City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
387
FY 2025-26
1 1 City Hall - HVAC Retrofit Project -$
1 2 Citywide - Community Choice Energy Study -$
1 3 Citywide - Costa Mesa Green Business Program -$
1 4 Citywide - Drought Resistant Landscape and Vegetation Replacement -$ 1 5 Citywide - Energy Efficiency Projects -$
1 6 Fire Stations - EV Solar and Power Stations -$
1 7 Various Facilities - Electric Vehicle Charging Stations -$ 1 TOTAL ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY -$
1 Next Category
1 8 Balearic Center - ADA Upgrades (Exterior Restrooms) -$ 1 9 Balearic Center - Fire Protection Sprinklers -$
1 10 Balearic Center - Install New HVAC Unit -$
1 11 Bridge Shelter - HVAC Automation -$
1 12 Building Modification Projects 150,000$
1 13 City Hall - 1st Floor Restroom and ADA Improvements -$ 1 14 City Hall - 5th Floor Air Handler Replacement -$
1 15 City Hall - 5th Floor Office Remodel -$
1 16 City Hall - All Doors Lock Replacement and Re-Key -$ 1 17 City Hall - Breezeway Roof -$
1 18 City Hall - Cast Iron Drain Repipe -$
1 19 City Hall - Chillers -$
1 20 City Hall - Curtain and Window Improvements (1 floor per year) -$ 1 21 City Hall - Dampers -$
1 22 City Hall - Heater(s) Replacement -$
1 23 City Hall - Information Technology Server Room A/C -$ 1 24 Civic Center - Miscellaneous Repairs 50,000$
1 25 Corp Yard - Construction of Breakroom and Additional Office Spaces -$ 1 26 Corp Yard - Equipment Maint. - Bay Doors and Vehicle Hoist Replace -$ 1 27 Corp Yard - Fleet Extend Bay #2 on North Side of Building for Fire Apparatus -$ 1 28 Corp Yard - Fleet Shop Doors -$
1 29 Corp Yard - Industrial Maintenance Shelter -$
1 30 Corp Yard - Old Facility Perimeter Concrete Improvements -$ 1 31 Costa Mesa Country Club Grounds Improvements -$
1 32 Costa Mesa Country Club Modernization -$
1 33 Costa Mesa Housing James / 18th Street Property Improvements -$ 1 34 Development Services Workstations -$
1 35 Donald Dungan Library HVAC Automation and Remote Access -$ 1 36 Donald Dungan Library Watt Stopper Lighting Control Replacement -$ 1 37 Downtown Aquatic Center Pool Gutter Grates -$
1 38 Downtown Recreation Center Flat Mineral Roof Replacement -$ Category/Project Title

ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY

FACILITIES
All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2025-26 is appropriated. 268 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
388
FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 20 28-29 FY 2029-30 Future Total -$ -$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 1,800,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 200,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 600,000$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 300,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ 1,400,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,850,000$ 4,350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 160,000$ 160,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ 165,000$ -$ 165,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 750,000$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245,000$ 245,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 254,019$ 254,019$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ 550,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 255,000$ 255,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 110,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 110,000$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 400,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 60,000$ 60,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 198,000$ 198,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 135,000$ 135,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 297,000$ 297,000$

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 Through Fiscal Year 2029-2030 All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2025-26 is appropriated. 269City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
389
FY 2025-26 Category/Project Title
1 39 Downtown Recreation Center Lighting Upgrade -$
1 40 Downtown Recreation Center Rooftop Heater Only Replacement -$ 1 41 Fire Department Expansion of Two CRR Offices Into Three Offices -$ 1 42 Fire Station 2 Reconstruction 12,000,000$
1 43 Fire Station 3 Apparatus Door Replacement -$
1 44 Fire Station 3 HVAC Rooftop Replacement -$
1 45 Fire Station 4 Door Conversion -$
1 46 Fire Station 4 Living Quarters Reconstruction -$
1 47 Fire Station 5 Rollup Doors and Operators Replacement -$ 1 48 Fire Station 6 Front Sectional Doors and Operators Replacement -$ 1 49 Fire Station 6 Repair Perimeter Walls -$
1 50 Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Fire Stations 50,000$ 1 51 Mesa Verde Library - ADA Compliance Improvements -$ 1 52 Mesa Verde Library - HVAC Replacement -$
1 53 Mesa Verde Library - Roof Replacement -$
1 54 Norma Hertzog Community Center - HVAC Automation and Remote Access -$ 1 55 Norma Hertzog Community Center - Watt Stopper Lighting Control Replacement -$ 1 56 Police Department - Chillers Replacement -$
1 57 Police Department - Emergency Communications Facility Improvements -$ 1 58 Police Department - Emergency Communications Roof Replacement -$ 1 59 Police Department - Emergency Operations Center Equipment Update -$ 1 60 Police Department - Exhaust Fans -$
1 61
Police Department - Facility Expansion and Reconfiguration for Real-Time Crime Center (RTCC) -$
1 62 Police Department - Locker Room Remodel/HVAC -$
1 63 Police Department - Main Floor Breakroom Remodel -$ 1 64 Police Department - Property & Evidence Storage - 3175 Airway Ave. -$ 1 65 Police Department - Weather Proofing -$
1 66 Police Department - Westside Sub Station Renovation -$ 1 67 Public Works General Services Workstations -$
1 68 Senior Center - Generator -$
1 69 Senior Center Facility Improvements -$
1 70 Senior Center Lighting Control Replacement -$
1 71 Various Facilities - HVAC Replacement Program -$
1 72 West Side Substation HVAC Replacement -$
1 73 West Side Substation Roof Replacement -$
1 TOTAL FACILITIES 12,250,000$
1 Next Category
1 74 Balearic Community Center Tot Lot Playground Maintenance -$ 1 75 Bark Park Turf Renovation -$
PARKS
FACILITIES (continued)
All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2025-26 is appropriated. 270 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
390
FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 20 28-29 FY 2029-30 Future Total

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 Through Fiscal Year 2029-2030 -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 126,000$ 126,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 360,000$ 360,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 98,000$ 98,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ 8,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 84,000$ 84,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ 55,000$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 200,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ 550,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 197,000$ 197,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 397,000$ 397,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 105,000$ 105,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 97,000$ 97,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ 425,000$ -$ -$ -$ 425,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 185,000$ 185,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 185,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ 1,685,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 275,000$ 275,000$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,450,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 265,000$ 265,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 298,000$ 298,000$ 610,000$ 1,775,000$ 2,925,000$ 3,065,000$ 28,721,019$ 49,346,019$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 530,000$ 530,000$ All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2025-26 is appropriated. 271City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
391
FY 2025-26 Category/Project Title
1 76 Bike Trail Lighting Cornerstone/Joann -$
1 77 Butterfly Gardens -$
1 78 Citywide Tree Maintenance (in Public Right-of-Way) 200,000$ 1 79 Estancia Park Covered Picnic Shelters/Pavillions -$ 1 80 Fairview Park - Asphalt Trail Rehabilitation -$
1 81 Fairview Park - Educational Hubs and Signage -$
1 82 Fairview Park - Fencing, Signage, and Trail Restoration -$ 1 83 Fairview Park - Mesa Restoration & Cultural Resource Preservation CA-ORA-58 -$ 1 84 Fairview Park - Replace Service Road Asphalt -$
1 85 Fairview Park Master Plan Implementation -$
1 86 Gisler Park - Light Poles Replacement -$
1 87 Harper Park - Playground Replacement -$
1 88 Jack Hammett Sports Complex - Field Restoration 100,000$ 1 89 Marina View Park Playground Replacement -$
1 90 Moon Park - Replace Existing Playground Equipment (2 areas) -$ 1 91 Neth Park Sculpture Garden -$
1 92 Park Parking Lot and Playground Rehabilitation 100,000$ 1 93 Park Security Lighting Replacement 75,000$
1 94 Park Sidewalk Replacement 75,000$
1 95 Shalimar Park Expansion -$
1 96 Shiffer Park - Replace Existing Playground Equipment (2 Areas) -$ 1 97 Shiffer Park - Restroom Improvements -$
1 98 Skate Park Parking Lot and Parking Spaces Expansion -$ 1 99 TeWinkle Park - Amphitheater -$
1 100 TeWinkle Park Athletic Complex Drainage Improvements -$ 1 101 Tree Planting and Small Tree Care -$
1 102 Various Parks - Rainbird Irrigation Controller Replacement -$ 1 103 Victoria Corridor Park Development -$
1 104 Wakeham Park - Playground and Planter Improvements -$ 1 105 Westside Park Development -$
1 TOTAL PARKS 550,000$
1 Next Category
1 106 Arlington Dr. at Newport Blvd. - Streetscape Improvements -$ 1 107 Arlington Drive - Bark Park Parking Lot Landscape Improvements -$ 1 108 Fair Drive - Civic Center -$
1 109 Gisler Avenue - Bike Trail Landscape -$
1 110 Gisler Avenue - Landscape Improvements -$
1 111 Newport Boulevard Landscape Improvements - 19th St. to Bristol St. -$ 1 112 Newport Boulevard Landscape Improvements - S/O 17th Street -$ 1 TOTAL PARKWAY & MEDIANS -$

PARKWAY & MEDIANS
PARKS (continued)
All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2025-26 is appropriated. 272 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
392
FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 20 28-29 FY 2029-30 Future Total

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 Through Fiscal Year 2029-2030 -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$ 150,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 75,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ 88,000$ -$ -$ 88,000$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 225,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ 8,000,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 450,000$ -$ 95,000$ -$ -$ -$ 95,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ 400,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 650,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ 975,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 450,000$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ 3,850,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 40,000$ -$ 160,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 750,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,000,000$ 12,000,000$ 1,265,000$ 1,070,000$ 2,823,000$ 1,800,000$ 28,355,000$ 35,863,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 180,000$ 180,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ -$ -$ 160,000$ -$ -$ 160,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 165,000$ 165,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 250,000$ 275,000$ -$ -$ 160,000$ 25,000$ 2,195,000$ 2,380,000$ All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2025-26 is appropriated. 273City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
393
FY 2025-26 Category/Project Title
1 Next Category
1 113 Brentwood Avenue - Storm Drain System -$
1 114 Cherry Lake Storm Drain System - Phase I, II & III -$ 1 115 Cherry Lake Storm Drain System - Phase IV & V -$
1 116 Citywide Alley Improvements -$
1 117 Citywide Storm Drain Improvements -$
1 118 Citywide Street Improvements 4,100,000$
1 119 Citywide Street Sign Replacement -$
1 120 Harbor Boulevard Rehabilitation Project (RMRA) 2,951,612$ 1 121 Parkway & Medians Improvement Program 125,000$
1 122 Water Quality Improvement Project -$
1 123 Westside Restoration Project -$
1 124 Westside Storm Drain Improvements -$
1 125 Westside Street Improvements - Wilson Street 230,000$ 1 TOTAL STREETS 7,406,612$
1 Next Category
1 126 Adams Avenue Active Transportation Improvements - Multipurpose Trails 4,223,000$ 1 127 Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility Project from Fairview to Harbor 850,000$ 1 128 Airport Channel / Delhi Channel Multi-Use Trail -$ 1 129 Baker - Coolidge Ave Traffic Signal Modifications -$ 1 130 Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Improvements 250,000$ 1 131 Bristol St. / Baker St. - Intersection Improvement (Add EBT, WBT) -$ 1 132 Bristol St. / I-405 NB - Ramps (Add WBR) -$
1 133 Bristol St. / Paularino Ave. (Add 2nd WBL) -$
1 134 Bristol St. / Sunflower Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add 3rd NBL) -$ 1 135 Bristol Street (Bear St. to Santa Ana Av.) - Bicycle Facility -$ 1 136 Bus Shelter Improvements -$
1 137 Center Street Pedestrian Crossing and Circulation Improvements 50,000$ 1 138 Citywide Bicycle Rack Improvements -$
1 139 Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements 100,000$ 1 140 Citywide Traffic Signal Improvements -$
1 141 Clean Mobility Options Program - On-Demand Transit Services 500,000$ 1 142 College Avenue Parking and Circulation Improvements -$ 1 143 Costa Mesa ITS Improvements (Communications, Central Sys. CCTV) -$ 1 144 E. 17th St. / Irvine Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add SBR, EBR) -$ 1 145 Eastside Traffic Calming (Cabrillo St., 18th St., 22nd St.) -$ 1 146 Fairview Channel Trail - Placentia Ave (n/o park) to Placentia Ave (s/o park) -$ 1 147 Fairview Road Active Transportation Improvements - Fair Drive to Adams Avenue 1,999,000$

STREETS

TRANSPORTATION
All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2025-26 is appropriated. 274 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
394
FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 20 28-29 FY 2029-30 Future Total

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 Through Fiscal Year 2029-2030 -$ -$ -$ -$ 793,040$ 793,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,721,600$ 2,721,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,009,360$ 2,009,360$ 650,000$ -$ 600,000$ -$ -$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 39,100,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,951,612$ 200,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 1,025,000$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 400,000$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 8,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 230,000$ 5,900,000$ 5,575,000$ 8,175,000$ 7,575,000$ 40,049,000$ 74,680,612$ 4,777,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 850,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,540,000$ 2,540,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 962,500$ 962,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 90,000$ 90,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,210$ 300,210$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,130,000$ 1,130,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 525,000$ 525,000$ -$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 50,000$ -$ 300,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ -$ 50,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 125,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 750,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ -$ 125,000$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,200,000$ 2,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,080,000$ 1,080,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,999,000$ All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2025-26 is appropriated. 275City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
395
FY 2025-26 Category/Project Title
1 148 Fairview Road. / Wilson St. - Improvements (Add EBT, WBT) -$ 1 149 Gisler Ave Class IV Cycle Tracks from Gibraltar Ave to Harbor Blvd -$ 1 150 Gisler Ave Multi-use Trail from Gisler Ave Class II facility to Fairview Rd -$ 1 151 Greenville-Banning Channel Phase 1 (Sunflower Ave to South Coast Drive) -$ 1 152 Greenville-Banning Channel Phase 2 (Santa Ana River Trail to South Coast Dr.) -$ 1 153 Harbor Blvd. / Adams Ave. - Intersection Improvements (Add NBL, NBR) -$ 1 154 Harbor Blvd. / Gisler Ave. - Intersection Improvements (Add SBR) -$ 1 155 Harbor Blvd. / MacArthur - Bus Turnout -$
1 156 Harbor Blvd. / South Coast Dr. - Intersection Improvement (Add EBR) -$ 1 157 Harbor Blvd. / Sunflower Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add EBR, WBR) -$ 1 158 Hyland Ave. / I-405 NB Ramp & South Coast Drive (Add 2nd WBT) -$ 1 159 Junipero -$
1 160 Mesa Drive and Santa Ana Ave Bicycle Facility Improvement -$ 1 161 Mesa Verde Drive East/ Peterson Place Class II Bicycle Facility -$ 1 162 New Sidewalk/Missing Link Program 100,000$
1 163 Newport Blvd. / 17th St. (Add NBR) -$
1 164 Newport Blvd. Northbound at Del Mar (Add WBTR) -$ 1 165 Newport Blvd. Northbound/22nd St. (Add WBTR, convert NBT to NBTR) -$ 1 166 Newport Blvd. Southbound at Fair Dr. (Add 2nd SBR) -$ 1 167 Orange Coast College West Bicycle Trail -$
1 168 Paularino Channel - Multipurpose Trail -$
1 169 Pedestrian Safety Festival 400,000$
1 170 Placentia Av. / 19th St. (Add SBR) -$
1 171 Placentia Av. / 20th St. HAWK Signal -$
1 172 Placentia Ave Multi-Use Path from Joann Trail to Estancia High School -$ 1 173 Priority Sidewalk Repair 65,000$
1 174 Santa Ana / Delhi Channel Multi-Use Trail from Santa Ana Ave to east City boundary -$ 1 175 Signal Modernization for Systemic Multi-Modal Safety Improvements -$ 1 176 SR-55 Frwy. N/B / Baker St. - Intersection Improvement (Add NBL, EBL) -$ 1 177 SR-55 Frwy. N/B / Paularino Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add WBR) -$ 1 178 SR-55 Frwy. S/B / Baker St. - Intersection Improvement (Add SBR) -$ 1 179 SR-55 Frwy. S/B / Paularino Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add SBR) -$ 1 180 Superior Av. / 17th St. (Convert WBT to WBTL, NBR) -$ 1 181 Susan Street Multi-Use Path from I-405 to South Coast Drive -$ 1 182 West 17th St. Widening - (Newport Boulevard to Placentia Avenue) -$ 1 183 Wilson Street (Fairview Rd. to Santa Ana Av.) - Bicycle Facility -$ 1 184 Wilson Street Widening - from College Ave. to Fairview Rd. -$ 1 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 8,537,000$
1 Next Category
28,743,612$ Total Five-Year Capital Improvement Projects TRANSPORTATION (continued)
All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2025-26 is appropriated. 276 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
396
FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 20 28-29 FY 2029-30 Future Total

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 Through Fiscal Year 2029-2030 -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,525,000$ 1,525,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 870,000$ 870,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,280,000$ 3,280,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,000,000$ 6,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,895,000$ 4,895,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 396,000$ 396,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,167,200$ 2,167,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 920,000$ 920,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 863,000$ 863,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$ -$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 132,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,000$ 15,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 760,000$ 760,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,500,000$ 4,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 386,000$ 386,000$ -$ 40,000$ 260,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 390,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 540,000$ 540,000$ -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,370,000$ 1,370,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 642,750$ 642,750$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 625,350$ 625,350$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 413,730$ 413,730$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ 700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 420,000$ 420,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000,000$ 10,000,000$ 7,242,000$ 1,780,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,340,000$ 55,738,740$ 77,637,740$ 15,017,000$ 10,200,000$ 17,483,000$ 15,905,000$ 156,908,759$ 244,257,371$ All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2025-26 is appropriated. 277City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
397
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026

FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 24-25
Adopted
FY 24-25
Amended
FY 25-26
Proposed
City Council
Council Member 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Management Analyst/Chief of Staff* 1.00 - - Management Analyst* 1.00 - - - -
Total City Council 10.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 *Constituent Services staff transferred to City Manager’s Office

City Manager’s Office
City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Manager 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant to the City Manager 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Central Services Supervisor 1.00 - - - -
City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community Outreach Worker ^ 2.00 2.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 Community Outreach Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy City Clerk 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Deputy City Manager - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Energy and Sustainability Service Manager - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant to the City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Graphics Designer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Human Resources Administrator 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Human Resources Analyst ^ 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 Human Resources Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Human Resources Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Human Resources Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Management Aide - 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Neighborhood Improvement Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Specialist II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Principal Human Resources Analyst 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Public Affairs Manager 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Real Property Manager - 1.00 - - -
Senior Management Analyst ^ 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Senior Code Enforcement Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Video Production Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Video Production Specialist 1.00 2.00 - - - Multimedia Specialist - 2.00 2.00 2.00
Website Coordinator/ Programmer Analyst I ^ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - Total City Manager’s Office 37.00 43.00 49.00 49.00 45.00 *Constituent Services staff transferred in City Manager’s Office * Energy and Sustainability Service Manager transferred in from Public Works ^ FY 2025/26 Proposed reduction of one FTE

65City of Costa Mesa, California
suMMarIes of
fInancIal data
398
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026

FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 24-25
Adopted
FY 24-25
Amended
FY 25-26
Proposed
Finance Department
Finance Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accounting Specialist I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Accounting Specialist II 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Accounting Supervisor 1.00 1.00 - - -
Administrative Assistant (CON) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Finance Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Budget and Purchasing Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Business License Inspector - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Buyer 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Finance Manager - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Finance Officer- Accounting - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finance Officer- Payroll (CON) - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finance Officer- Purchasing - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finance Officer- Revenue - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 Payroll Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Payroll Supervisor 1.00 1.00 - - -
Permit Processing Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Purchasing Supervisor 1.00 1.00 - - -
Revenue Supervisor 1.00 1.00 - - -
Senior Accountant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Budget Analyst 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 -
Total Finance Department 24.00 25.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 Parks And Community Services Department
Parks and Community Services Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Arts Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Recreation Supervisor 3.00 -
Community Outreach Worker - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fairview Park Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Worker 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Management Analyst 1.00 - - - -
Office Specialist II* 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Recreation Coordinator* 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Recreation Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Recreation Specialist - 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Recreation Supervisor 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Senior Management Analyst - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Recreation Supervisor 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Total Parks and Community Svcs Department 18.00 25.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 *One Recreation Coordinator transferred to PD Adopted FY 23/24 * One position has been defunded in FY 25/26

66 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
399
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026

FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 24-25
Adopted
FY 24-25
Amended
FY 25-26
Proposed
Information Technology Department
Information Technology Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Information Technology Manager 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Computer Operations & Networking Sup. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cyber Security Analyst - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Management Analyst 1.00 - - - -
Network Administrator 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Office Specialist II - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Programmer Analyst II 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Senior Management Analyst - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Programmer Analyst 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Systems & Programming Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total Information Technology Department 20.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00

Police Department
Police Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Police Chief - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Account Specialist II 1.00 1.00 1.00
Animal Services Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 Animal Control Officer 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Animal Control Supervisor - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Civilian Investigator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Communications Installer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Communications Officer 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 Communications Supervisor 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Community Services Specialist 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Court Liaison 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Crime Analyst 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Crime Prevention Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crime Scene Investigation Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crime Scene Specialist 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Custody Officer - 10.00 10.00 10.00 11.00
Custody Supervisor - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Electronics Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Emergency Services Manager * 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Management Analyst 1.00 - - - -
Office Specialist II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Park Ranger 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
Permit Processing Specialist - 1.00 1.00 1.00 67City of Costa Mesa, California
suMMarIes of
fInancIal data
400
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026

FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 24-25
Adopted
FY 24-25
Amended
FY 25-26
Proposed
Police Captain 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Police Lieutenant 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Police Officer 107.00 107.00 107.00 107.00 107.00 Police Records Bureau Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Police Records Shift Supervisor 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Police Records and Property & Evidence Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Police Sergeant 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 Police Training Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Property Evidence Specialist 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Property Evidence Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Public Affairs Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Range Master 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation Coordinator* 1.00 - - -
Senior Communications Officer 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Senior Communications Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Management Analyst - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Police Officer 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Senior Police Records Technician 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 Telecommunications Manager * 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Total Police Department 221.50 238.00 242.00 242.00 243.00

* Emergency Services Manager & Telecommunications Manager shared between Police Department and Fire and Rescue Department Fire And Rescue Department
Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Fire Chief/Operations - sworn - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Fire Chief/Community Risk Reduction - non
sworn - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Fire Marshal 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Fire Marshal 1.00 - - - -
Code Enforcement Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Division Chief - Administration 1.00 - - - - Battalion Chief 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Emergency Medical Services Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Emergency Services Manager * - 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fire Captain 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 Fire Captain - Administration/Training/PIO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fire Captain - Administration/EMS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fire Engineer 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 Fire Protection Specialist 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Firefighter 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00
Management Analyst 1.00 - - - -
Office Specialist II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Manager Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Telecommunications Manager * 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Total Fire Department 96.50 97.00 97.00 97.00 97.00 * Emergency Services Manager & Telecommunications Manager shared between Police Department and Fire and Rescue Department*

68 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
401
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026

FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 24-25
Adopted
FY 24-25
Amended
FY 25-26
Proposed

Development Services Department
Economic & Development Services Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Development Services Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Planner 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Associate Planner 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Building/Combination Bldg. Inspector 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Building Technician II 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Chief of Code Enforcement * - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Chief of Inspection 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Chief Plans Examiner 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Code Enforcement Officer * 9.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Community Improvement Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Economic Development Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grant Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Management Analyst 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Specialist II * 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Permit Processing Specialist 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Planning and Sustainable Development Manager - 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Plan Checker 1.00 - - - -
Plan Check Engineer 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Principal Planner 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Senior Code Enforcement Officer 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Senior Combination Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Senior Planner 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Total Development Services Department 48.00 50.00 53.00 53.00 53.00 *One position has been defunded in FY 25/26

Public Works Department
Public Works Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Active Transportation Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Assistant Engineer 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Assistant City Engineer - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Associate Engineer 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 City Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Construction Inspector 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Deputy Director of Public Works - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Energy and Sustainability Service Manager 1.00 1.00 - - - Engineering Technician II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Technician III * 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Equipment Mechanic I - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Equipment Mechanic II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Equipment Mechanic III 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 69City of Costa Mesa, California
suMMarIes of
fInancIal data
402
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Through Fiscal Year 2025-2026

FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 24-25
Adopted
FY 24-25
Amended
FY 25-26
Proposed
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Facilities Maintenance Technician * 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lead Facilities Maintenance Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lead Maintenance Worker 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Lead Equipment Mechanic 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Superintendent 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Maintenance Supervisor * 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Maintenance Worker 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Specialist II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Principal Civil Engineer 1.00 - - - -
Senior Engineer * 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Senior Maintenance Technician 1.00 - - - - Senior Maintenance Worker 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Storekeeper 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Transportation Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total Public Works Department 75.00 80.00 79.00 79.00 79.00

* Energy and Sustainability Service Manager transferred to City Manager’s Office FY 23/24 Adopted * One position has been defunded in FY 25/26
Total Full-time Employees 550.00 588.00 602.00 602.00 599.00

Part-Time Employees FTE’s (Full-Time Equivalents)

City Council 0.50 - - - -
City Manager’s Office 10.95 8.32 8.32 8.32 8.32 Finance Department - - 0.75 0.75 0.75
Parks and Community Services 70.16 63.82 62.57 62.57 62.57 Information Technology Department 0.50 - - - - Police Department 18.86 16.86 14.75 22.25 22.25 Fire and Rescue Department 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Development Services Department 5.34 5.34 5.34 5.34 5.34 Public Works Department 6.25 5.50 6.00 6.00 6.00

Total Part-time FTEs 114.81 102.09 99.98 107.48 107.48

Total Citywide FTEs 664.81 702.81 701.98 709.48 706.48 70 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
403
Resolution No. 2025-XX Page 1 of 3

ATTACHMENT 7

RESOLUTION NO. 2025 -xx

A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA AND THE COSTA

MESA HOUSING AUTHORITY ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA AND THE COSTA MESA HOUSING AUTHORITY DO HEREBY FIND AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution adopted on January 17, 2012, declared the need for a housing authority to function in the City of Costa Mesa, established the “Costa Mesa Housing Authority” (“Housing Authority”), and declared that the members of the City Council are the Commissioners of the Housing Authority pursuant to the California Housing Authorities Law, commencing with Health & Safety Code Section 34200, et seq. (“HAL”); and WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa is a California municipal corporation and general law city (“City”); and
WHEREAS, the City and Housing Authority desire to establish an annual budget for the Housing Authority; and
WHEREAS, the establishment of a budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 (“FY 25-26”) has been prepared by the City Manager and Executive Director of the Housing Authority; and WHEREAS, the budgeting process establishes the plan of expenditures and the priorities of the Housing Authority and the Housing and Community Development Division of the Development Services Department of the City, in particular as to the functions, duties, and operations of the Housing Authority pursuant to the HAL and as to the affordable housing assets, functions, and duties created by dissolution of the former Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Parts 1.8 and

1.85 of Division 24, of the California Health and Safety Code (“Dissolution Law”); and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa and the Costa Mesa Housing Authority as follows:

SECTION 1. The annual budget for the Housing Authority for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026, as prepared and submitted by the City Manager/Executive Director, is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2. To ensure appropriate service levels and to carry out the statutory obligations of the HAL and Dissolution Law, the City Manager/Executive Director is authorized to expend funds or transfer funds among operating budgets or project budgets within adopted appropriations as needed and as permitted by law.
404
Resolution No. 2025-XX Page 2 of 3

SECTION 3. The City Clerk and Housing Authority Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this
3rd day of June, 2025.

John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST:

Brenda Green, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025-xx and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 3 rd day of June, 2025, by
the following roll call vote, to wit:

CITY COUNCIL:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

HOUSING AUTHORITY:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

405
Resolution No. 2025-XX Page 3 of 3

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 3rd day of June, 2025.

Brenda Green, City Clerk

406
Housing Authority

HOUSING

AUTHORITY
407
On January 17, 2012, the City Council established the Costa Mesa Housing Authority in accordance with California Housing Authorities Law, Health, and Safety Code Section 34200, et seq. Also on that date by resolution, the City Council selected the Housing Authority to serve as the housing successor and to assume the housing assets, duties, functions and obligations of the former Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency (Former Agency) as of February 1, 2012. These actions occurred due to the mandatory dissolution of all California redevelopment agencies under the requirements of Division 24, Parts 1.8 and 1.85 of the California Health and Safety Code (Dissolution Law). The Dissolution Law sets forth the processes and obligations of all successor agencies. These entities are separate from the city (or county) that formed the former agency and charged with winding down the affairs of former redevelopment agencies. Further, the Dissolution Law sets forth the functions, obligations and requirements of housing successors.

Section 34176.1 of the California Health and Safety Code establishes certain limitations on expenditures by housing successors. Thus, each fiscal year the Housing Authority’s funding is limited in two categories: (1) administrative costs, and (2) homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing.

The Behavioral Health Bridge Housing (BHBH) Program was created by Assembly Bill 179 (AB179), which allocated $1.5 billion to the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) for allocation to counties to support planning, implementation, and infrastructure costs for the CARE Act. The City was awarded BHBH funds in FY 2024-25 by the County to assist homeless individuals who are experiencing serious behavioral health conditions by providing temporary housing and support services.

Covenant Monitoring and Administration - 11500
Rental Rehabilitation — 20425
Offers deferred loans to owner of multi-family properties to make improvements and repair code violations. Loans were originated in the 1990s and deferred unless the owner sells transfers or defaults on the property.

Housing Authority Administration — 20600
Provides administration support such as conducting required board meetings, maintaining financial records and preparing annual reports, etc.

Costa Mesa Family Village — 20620
Costa Mesa Family Village is a three-parcel, 72-unit multi-family rental project, to which the Housing Authority holds the ground lease. The 55-year ground lease expires in year 2038. Annual lease payment is the greater of 8 percent of gross receipts or $108,000.

First Time Homebuyer Program — 20625
Offers deferred loans to first time homebuyers for home purchase in the City. Loans were extended prior to year 2009 under various terms.

Habitat For Humanity — 20630
The Housing Authority holds interest to the land used for the development of five single-family homes by Habitat for Humanity in 2004. The Housing Authority maintains enforceable covenants on the properties. No loan repayment is required unless the owner defaults.

Single Family Rehabilitation Program — 20640
Offers deferred loans to homeowners to make home improvements and fix code violations. The loans were extended in year 2009 and deferred until the property is sold or refinanced.

St. John Manor — 20650
St. Johns Manor is a 36-unit senior rental project. The Housing Authority’s loan to this project was paid off in Fiscal Year 2018-19.

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
280 City of Costa Mesa, California 408
Costa Mesa Village — 20655
Costa Mesa Village is a 96-unit single room occupancy (SRO) project jointly funded by the Costa Mesa Housing Authority, Orange County Housing Authority and the developer. The Housing Authority’s loan to this project was paid off in Fiscal Year 2014-15.

Housing Development And Preservation Of Affordable Housing - 11500 James/West 18th Street Property — 20635
The James/West 18th Property is four affordable housing projects with 30 rental units, owned and operated by the Housing Authority. The Authority acquired the projects through a foreclosure process in Fiscal Year 2015-16.

Homeless Outreach And Bridge Shelter Operation - 14300
Homeless Outreach — 20605
Homeless Outreach’s primary activities are community outreach and working with various organizations and governmental agencies to identify housing solutions for Costa Mesas homeless population. The General Fund will provide funding for program expenses in excess of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds (LMIHAFs) $250,000 allowance for this category.

Bridge Shelter Operation — 20606
Another new component to the Housing Authority is the operation of the City’s permanent bridge shelter program, which is located at 3175 Airway Avenue. This program provides transitional housing and support services for up to 85 homeless adults. Beginning in fiscal year 2024-25, the cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to allocate 20 of the 85 shelter beds to Newport Beach’s use.

Behavioral Health Bridge Housing Program- 20670
The primary focus of the BHBH Program is to assist individuals experiencing homelessness who have serious behavioral health conditions that prevent them from accessing resources and securing permanent housing. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) and the City of Costa Mesa was entered to establish BHBH services.

281City of Costa Mesa, California
housIng
authorIty
409
Budget Narrative
The Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget for the Housing Authority is approximately $5.6 million, a decrease of $900,000, or 15 percent, compared to the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25. With the expansion of a permanent homeless shelter facility, the City continues to grow its partnerships with the City of Newport Beach, and homeless services contractor Mercy House and Bracken’s Kitchen, to increase the number of beds and meals to better serve the people experiencing homelessness year round.

FY 22-23
Actuals
FY 23-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 24-25
Adopted
Budget
FY 25-26
Proposed
Budget

REVENUES BY FUNDING SOURCE
Behavioral Health Services $ 972,051 $ 972,051 Costa Mesa Family Village Ground Lease $ 168,102 $ 120,000 150,000 200,000 James Street 248,386 250,000 250,000 250,000
Investment Income 38,282 23,400 31,550 -
Loan Repayments 216,065 6,000 200,000 390,000 RDA Loan Repayment from DOF (Annual ROPS) 258,209 381,141 - - State SB 2 Grant - 821,579 324,000 -
General Fund Contribution 1,638,708 1,264,993 1,264,993 1,264,993 Other Governmental Agencies 1,250,000 1,000,000 1,326,000 1,359,219 Donations 3,891 - - -
Use of Fund Balance - 301,364 1,549,646 834,559 Transfers in from (State Grants) 3,650,000 231,839 454,308 750,000 Total Housing Authority Revenues $ 7,471,643 $ 4,400,316 $ 6,522,548 $ 6,020,822 FY 22-23
Actuals
FY 23-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 24-25
Adopted
Budget
FY 25-26
Proposed
Budget

EXPENSE CATEGORY BY PROGRAM
COVENANT MONITORING AND ADMINISTRATION - 11500

Rental Rehabilitation - 20450

Housing Authority Administration - 20600
Salaries and Benefits $ 67,6 45 $ 62,021 $ 106,347 $ 111,698 Maintenance and Operations 14,862 9,381 60,000 60,000 Subtotal Housing Authority Administration $ 82,507 $ 71,403 $ 166,347 $ 171,698

Costa Mesa Family Village - 20620
Maintenance and Operations $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Subtotal Costa Mesa Family Village $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000

First Time Homebuyer Program - 20625
Maintenance and Operations $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ 11,000 Subtotal First Time Homebuyer Program $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ 11,000

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
282 City of Costa Mesa, California 410
FY 22-23
Actuals
FY 23-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 24-25
Adopted
Budget
FY 25-26
Proposed
Budget
COVENANT MONITORING AND ADMINISTRATION - 11500 (Continued) Habitat for Humanity - 20630
Maintenance and Operations $ 645 $ - $ 7 ,000 $ 7 ,000 Fixed Assets 46,231 50,854 - -
Subtotal Habitat for Humanity $ 46,876 $ 50,854 $ 7,000 $ 7,000

Single Family Rehabilitation Program - 20640
Maintenance and Operations $ 1,333 $ - $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Subtotal Single Family Rehabilitation Prog. $ 1,333 $ - $ 20,000 $ 20,000

St. John Manor - 20650
Maintenance and Operations $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Subtotal St. John Manor $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000

Costa Mesa Village - 20655
Maintenance and Operations $ - $ - $ 3,100 $ 3,100 Subtotal Costa Mesa Village $ - $ - $ 3,100 $ 3,100

Subtotal Covenant Monitoring and Admin. $ 130,716 $ 122,257 $ 217,447 $ 222,798

HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING - 11500

James/West 18th Street Property - 20635
Salaries and Benefits $ 34,727 $ 40,107 $ 62,930 $ 65,226 Maintenance and Operations 164,440 262,122 202,500 $ 202,500 Fixed Assets - - 27,600 27,600
Subtotal James/West 18th Street Property $ 199,167 $ 302,229 $ 293,030 $ 295,326

HOMELESS OUTREACH AND BRIDGE SHELTER OPERATION - 11310|11500|14300|11100

CDBG-CV - 20435
Salaries and Benefits $ 7,529 $ 1,136 $ - $ - Maintenance and Operations $ 497, 324 $ 170,027 $ - $ - Subtotal Homeless Outreach $ 504,852 $ 171,163 $ - $ -

Tenant Based Rental Assistance - 20448
Salaries and Benefits $ - $ - $ 292,978 $ 208,315 Subtotal Homeless Outreach $ - $ - $ 292,978 $ 208,315

Homeless Outreach - 20605 *
Salaries and Benefits $ 866,756 $ 1,145,954 $ 1,588,407 $ 1,535,536 Maintenance and Operations 50,036 63,659 108,243 108,243 Fixed Assets 300 - - -
Subtotal Homeless Outreach $ 917,093 $ 1,209,613 $ 1,696,650 $ 1,643,779

283City of Costa Mesa, California
housIng
authorIty
411
FY 22-23
Actuals
FY 23-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 24-25
Adopted
Budget
FY 25-26
Proposed
Budget
Bridge Shelter Operation - 20606 10,701,004
Maintenance and Operations $ 2,064,021 $ 3,246,644 $ 2,678,553 $ 2,678,553 Fixed Assets - 33,233 - -
Subtotal Bridget Shelter Operation $ 2,064,021 $ 3,279,877 $ 2,678,553 $ 2,678,553

Behavioral Health Services - 20670 1,944,102
Salaries and Benefits $ - $ - $ 284,050 $ 284,050 Maintenance and Operations $ - $ - $ 688,001 $ 688,001 Subtotal Behavioral Health Services $ - $ - $ 972,051 $ 972,051

TOTAL HOUSING AUTHORITY

Salaries and Benefits $ 976,657 $ 1,249,219 $ 2,334,712 $ 2,204,825 Maintenance and Operations 2,792,661 3,751,833 3,788,397 3,788,397 Fixed Assets 46,531 84,087 27,600 27,600
Total Housing Authority $ 3,815,849 $ 5,085,139 $ 6,150,709 $ 6,020,822 Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
284 City of Costa Mesa, California 412

ATTACHMENT 9

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-xx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING AND ADOPTING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 202 5-2026, IN ACCORDANCE

WITH ARTICLE XIII-B OF THE CONS TITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS AM ENDED BY PROPOSITION 111 AND SENATE BILL 88.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, Article XIII-B was added to the Constitution of the State of California at a general election held on November 6, 1979; and
WHEREAS, Article XIII-B was subsequently modified by Proposition 111 and Senate Bill 88 (Chapter 60/90) at a general election held on June 5, 1990; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 7910 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California, an annual appropriations limit must be established for the City effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City has chosen to use the California per capita income percentage change of

6.44% and the County ’s population growth rate of 0.17% as the factors to be used in calculating its appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2025-2026; and
WHEREAS, these factors are applied to the City’s adopted appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 in determining the City’s appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2025-2026; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

The appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 is established at $330,924,446.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3
rd day of June, 2025.

________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________ ___________________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly H. Barlow, City Attorney

413

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 3rd day of June, 2025.

__________________________________

BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK

414

CITY OF COSTA MESA

RATE DETERMINATION
Effective July 1, 2025
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 2.13, the following is a list of frequently requested hourly rates 3 Other City Positions
Straight
Time 1
Special
Event
Overtime
Rate 2
Fire Positions
Straight
Time 1
Special
Event
Overtime
Rate 2
Animal Control Officer $53 $64 Battalion Chief $145 $208 Animal Control Supervisor $61 $87 Fire Captain $108 $156 Animal Services Coordinator $53 $76 Fire Engineer $94 $134 Assistant Engineer $65 $80 Firefighter $81 $116
Associate Engineer $81 $100 Firefighter - Paramedic $90 $129 Associate Planner $70 $101
Chief Plans Examiner $93 $113 Police Positions
Code Enforcement Officer II $50 $63 Police Cadet 4 $62 $69 Communications Officer $58 $71 Police Lieutenant $139 $199 Communications Supervisor $67 $82 Police Officer $87 $124 Community Services Specialist $43 $54 Police Officer (Motorcycle) $91 $129 Construction Inspector $56 $68 Police Officer (K9) $95 $136 Crime Analyst $47 $67 Police Recruit $76 $85
Crime Prevention Specialist $52 $63 Police Reserve Officer $97 $108 Crime Scene Investigator $53 $65 Police Sergeant $106 $151 Equipment Mechanic II $46 $57 Police Sergeant (Motorcycle) $110 $158 Equipment Mechanic III $49 $61 Police Support Services Reserve $41 $45 Facilities Maintenance Technician $44 $55 Senior Police Officer $91 $130 Lead Equipment Mechanic $56 $69 Senior Police Officer (Motorcycle) $95 $136 Lead Maintenance Worker $53 $65
Maintenance Services Manager $83 $103 Community Risk Reduction Team Maintenance Supervisor $62 $76 Assistant Fire Chief - Non Sworn/Fire Marshal $106 $131 Maintenance Worker (Maint Assistant/Worker) $40 $48 Assistant Fire Marshal $77 $95 Office Specialist I $35 $43 Code Enforcement Officer I $50 $63 Office Specialist II $37 $46 Fire Protection Specialist $61 $75 Park Ranger $48 $59
Plan Check Engineer $84 $104 Other Positions
Principal Planner $97 $139 Custody Officer $69 $91
Property and Evidence Specialist $49 $61 Police Records Technician $38 $47 Senior Maintenance Worker $43 $54 Senior Police Records Technician $41 $50 Senior Combination Building Inspector $72 $104
Notes
- Rates are based on most recent applicable Memorandum of Understanding. 1 Includes annual salary at top step, other compensation and benefits (excluding Unfunded Actuarial Liability and Cafeteria), divided by 2,080 hours/annually. 2 Includes straight time hourly rate plus 1/2 of the basic hourly rate divided by 2,080 hours. Other benefits are excluded from this portion of the calculations.
3 These rates do not include equipment and apparatus charges. Equipment and apparatus rates to be utilized are based on CalOES CalOES established rates. The most recent rates may be found at https://www.caloes.ca.gov/office-of-the-director/operations/response-operations/fire-rescue/administration-reimbursement/. 4 Per City Council Resolution 2023-48, the classification has been renamed from Police Aide to Police Cadet. 415
Costa Mesa
Police Department
Annual AB 481 Report
FY 2024/2025
______________________________________________________________________ On August 2, 2022, military equipment, as defined under Government Code 7070, was approved for police use by the Costa Mesa Cit y Council, consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 481. The policy regarding use of such equipment is documented under Costa Mesa Police Department (CMPD) Policy Manual sect ion 706 and is publicly available on the Costa Mesa Police Department website. Types, quantities, descriptions, and costs of equipment are contained in section 706.5 of t he Policy Manual. As of this report, the items, uses, their quantities, their costs, and their purpos es have not changed. The Department does not currently to acquire equi pment beyond what is already authorized in Policy 706.

From April 17, 2024 to April 17, 2025, the CMPD has received zero (0) complaints about any of the items outli ned in Policy Section 706.5. Duri ng the same period, there were zero (0) internal audits and zero (0) violations of the AB 481 Equipment Use Policy.

The CMPD recognizes critical incidents can be unpredictable and rapidly evolving. The equipment listed in the AB 481 Equipment Use Policy greatly assists law enforcement in bringing those incidents to a safe and swift resolution. The use of AB 481 equipment is continuously evaluated by department personnel to ensure compliance with State law and Department policy/procedure.

The following section outlines the AB 481 equipment used by members of the CMPD from April 17, 2024 to April 17, 2025. Certain items of AB 481 equipment, particularly consumables (ammunition, diversionary devices, pepper balls, chemical agents, etc.) are used throughout the year on a regular basis for training and maintaining operational proficiency. Training usage is not captured in this section. This section only provides data for the operational use of AB 481 equipm ent listed within this annual AB 481 Use Summary Report.

The CMPD utilizes or displays certain piec es of AB 481 equipment during outreach and community engagement events as a means of raising awareness, transparency, and education. Such events include but are not limited to, the CMPD Citizens Academy, National Night Out, the Lion’s Club Fish Fry, and Imaginology events. The usage of the equipment in these events is not reflected in this report.

Other items listed in the CMPD Policy Manual section 7 06.5 that are no t specifically mentioned in the summary above were not used during the time frame of this report.

Specifics regarding the purpos e of each item, the associ ated costs and the quantity possessed is outlined under CMPD Policy Manual Section 706 and 706.5 (Attached). 416
The following is data for AB 481 use by category:

VEHICLES
Mobile Command Vehicle (MCV)
The MCV was used a total of (8) times from April 17, 2024 to April 17, 2025, during official law enforcement activities in accordance with CMPD policy.

Authorized Usages:

Only officers trained in the use and depl oyment of the MCV shall drive the vehicle under the direction of the Chief of Police, Field Operations Captain, Support Services Captain, SWAT Commander, Watch Commander, or their designee. Situations where the MCV may be deployed include but are not limited to:
 Critical incidents
 Natural disasters
 Special events
 Training
 Emergencies
Armored Rescue Vehicles (ARVs)
The CMPD ARV was used (4) times from April 17, 2024 to April 17, 2025

Authorized Use:

The ARVs use shall be authorized by the Chief of Police, Division Commander, Watch Commander, or SWAT Commander based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident. ARVs shall only be used by personnel trained in their deployment and in a manner consistent with Department policies/procedures. Sit uations, where the ARVs may be deployed, include but are not limited to:
 Critical incidents
 Natural disasters
 Special events
 Training
 Emergencies

417

SPECIALIZED TACTICAL EQUIPMENT

Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
UASs were utilized at total of (137) times from April 17, 2024 to April 17, 2025, during official law enf orcement activities in accordance with CMPD policy.

Authorized usages:

Only assigned operators who have comp leted the required training shall be permitted to operate any UAS duri ng approved missions. The UAS is to be deployed when its capabilities w ould assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations, which include but are not limited to:
 Major collision investigations
 Search for missing persons
 Natural disaster management
 Crime scene photography
 SWAT, tactical, or other public safety and life preservation missions.
 In response to specific requests from local, State, or Federal fire authorities for fire response and/or prevention.

Tactical Robot
The Tactical Robot was not used from April 17, 2024 to April 17, 2025.

Authorized usages:

The tactical robot shall only be deployed by Department personnel trained in its use, and with the approval of the SWAT Commander, Watch Commander, or their designee. Sit uations, where the robots may be deployed, include but are not limited to:
 Critical incidents
 Natural disasters
 Special events

418

LESS- LETHAL DEVICES

40mm Launchers and Munitions
40mm launchers and munitions were not used from April 17, 2024 to April 17, 2025.

Authorized usages:

Situations where the deployment of less-lethal impact or chemical munitions are authorized include but are not limited to:
 Self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals.  Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents where the criminal behavior involved exceeds a failure to disburse or curfew violation.
 Circumstances where a tactic al advantage can be obtained.  Vicious animals
 Training exercises or approved demonstrations
 Tactical situations invo lving the deployment of the
Department's SWAT Team in cluding but not limited to,
barricaded subjects.

PepperBall Launcher and Munitions
PepperBall launcher and munitions were used (4) times from April 17, 2024 to April 17, 2025

Authorized usages:

Only officers who have received certif ication in the use of PepperBall are authorized to use PepperBa ll. Situations where the Pepperball may be deployed include, but are not limited to:
 Tactical situations invo lving the deployment of the
Department's SWAT Team
 Training exercises or approved demonstrations
 Potentially vicious animals
 Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained  Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents
 Self-destructive, dangerous, and/ or combative individuals

Chemical and Smoke Canisters
Chemical and smoke canisters were not used from April 17, 2024 to April 17, 2025
419
Authorized usages:

Only SWAT officers who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are author ized to use chemical agents. Situations where the chemical agents may be deployed include, but are not limited to:
 Self-destructive, dangerous, and/ or combative individuals  Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents
 Circumstances where a tactic al advantage can be obtained.  Potentially vicious animals
 Training exercises or approved demonstrations
 Tactical situations invo lving the deployment of the
Department's SWAT Team.

FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION
Rifles and Ammunition
Rifles and associated ammunition were deployed, but never fired, various times during official law enforcement ac tivities in accordance with CMPD policy.

Authorized usages:

Only officers POST certified in the us e of the rifle are authorized to deploy them in the field. Situat ions where rifles may be used include, to prevent serious bodily injury or death to self or others and during training.

420
Resolution No. 2025-XX Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 12
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,

RENEWING ITS MILITARY EQUIPMENT POLICY

RECITALS
A. On September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481 (“AB 481”), adding Chapter 12.8, “Funding, Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment”, to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code (sections 7070 – 7075), relating to the use of military equipment by California law enforcement agencies; and B. AB 481 seeks to provide transparency, oversight, and an opportunity for meaningful public input on decisions regarding whether and how military equipment is funded, acquired, or used; and
C. AB 481 requires, inter alia, the Police Department submit to the City Council an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the City Council; and
D. The City Council shall review its Ordinance approving the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment at least annually and vote on whether to renew the Ordinance at a regular meeting; and
E. The City Council shall determine, based on the annual military equipment report submitted, whether each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in its Ordinance; and F. The City Council has reviewed the annual military report submitted by the Police Department and determined the military equipment has complied with the standards for approval set forth in its Ordinance; and
G. The City Council previously renewed Ordinance No. 2022-03 by resolution of the City Council set forth below.

H. The City Council desires to again renew Ordinance No. 2022-03.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantial part of this resolution.

SECTION 2. City of Costa Mesa Ordinance No. 2022-03 is hereby renewed.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to passage and adoption thereof. 421
Resolution No. 2025-XX Page 2 of 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2025.

________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST:

________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

422
ORDINANCE NO. 2022- 03

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AB 481 EQUIPMENT USE POLICY OF THE CITY

OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA GOVERNING THE USE OF MILITARY

EQUIPMENT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY FIND AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481 (" AB 481"), adding Chapter 12. 8, " Funding, Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment", to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code ( sections 7070 — 7075), relating to the use of equipment identified by the state as "military equipment" hereinafter referred to as " AB 481 equipment") by California law enforcement agencies;
WHEREAS, AB 481 seeks to provide transparency, oversight, and an opportunity for meaningful public input on decisions regarding whether and how AB 481 equipment is funded, acquired, or used;
WHEREAS, the Costa Mesa Police Department is in possession of certain items of equipment that qualify as " military equipment" under AB 481 and further intends to acquire other items that fall under this definition; WHEREAS, AB 481 requires, inter alia, that a law enforcement agency possessing and using such qualifying equipment must prepare a publicly released, written, military equipment use policy document ( hereinafter referred to as the " AB 481 Equipment Use Policy") covering the, description, quantity, purpose, capabilities, use, lifespan, acquisition, maintenance, authorized use, fiscal impacts, procedures, training, oversight, and complaint process, applicable to the Department' s use of such equipment;
WHEREAS, the policy must be approved by the City Council by ordinance, and reviewed annually thereafter; and
WHEREAS, the AB 481 equipment inventoried and presented to the City Council is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety;
WHEREAS, the proposed AB 481 Equipment Use Policy (" Policy") will safeguard the public's health, welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties; Ordinance No. 2022- 03 Page 1 of 4
ATTACHMENT 13
423
WHEREAS, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; WHEREAS, prior AB 481 equipment use complied with the applicable equipment use policy ( which included equipment now defined as military equipment) that was in effect at the time;
WHEREAS, the Police Department has submitted the proposed Policy to the City Council and thereafter has made those documents available on the Police Department' s website for at least 30 days prior to the public hearing concerning the AB 481 equipment at issue;
WHEREAS, the Policy satisfies the requirements of Government Code Section 7070( d);
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, having received the information required under AB 481 regarding the Costa Mesa Police Department' s use of AB 481 equipment as defined in said law, deems it to be in the best interest of the City to and hereby does approve the AB 481 Equipment Use Policy.

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HERBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: Recitals. The City Council finds that all the recitals, facts, findings, and conclusions set forth above in the preamble of this Ordinance are true and correct.

Section 2: Approval of AB 481 Equipment Use Policy.

AB 481 Equipment Use Policy.
a) The AB 481 Equipment Use Policy shall govern the use of AB 481 equipment by the Costa Mesa Police Department.
b) The Policy shall be made publicly available on the Police Department' s website for as long as the AB 481 equipment is available for use or as otherwise ordained by the City Council.
c) The Police Department shall submit an annual AB 481 equipment report to the City Council containing the information required by Government Code Section 7072 and the City Council shall thereafter determine whether each type of AB 481 equipment identified therein complied with the standards for approval set forth in Government Code Section 7071( d).

Ordinance No. 2022- 03 Page 2 of 4
424
d) The City Council shall on an annual basis and at a regular meeting thereof review this ordinance and vote on whether to renew it pursuant to Government Code Section 7071( e)( 2).
e) The definitions set forth in Government Code section 7070 shall apply to this ordinance. Any provision of state law referred to herein shall mean and include any amended or successor provision thereof.

Section 3: Compliance with CEQA. Adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061 ( b)( 3) General Rule) of the CEQA Guidelines because it is not a "project' and because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the passage of this Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 4: Inconsistencies. Any provision of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance.

Section 5: Uncodified Ordinance. This Ordinance shall not be codified in the Costa Mesa Municipal Code unless and until the City Council so ordains.

Section 6: Severability. If any chapter, article, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance, or the application thereof to any person, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or its application to other persons. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each chapter, article, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of the application thereof to any person, be declared invalid or unconstitutional. No portion of this Ordinance shall supersede any local, state, or federal law, regulation, or codes dealing with life safety factors.

Section 7: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty ( 30) days following its adoption.

Section 8: Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted or published in the manner as required by law.

Ordinance No. 2022- 03 Page 3 of 4
425
APPROVEDAND ADOPTEDon this 2ndday of August, 2022.

ATTEST:

Brenda Gree City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE

CITY OF COSTA MESA
ss
6 - 6 - To %
1%
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
4- -'
LLa
r
TrT
KimberlyHallBarlow, CityAttorney
I, Brenda Green, CITY CLERK of the City of Costa Mesa California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19thday of July, 2022, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2ndday of August, 2022, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: CHAVEZ, GAMEROS, HARLAN, HARPER, REYNOLDS, MARR, AND STEPHENS.

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE.

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 3rdday of August, 2022.
jy-2A& Nsx* j
BrendaGreen,16tyClerk
Ordinance No. 2022- 03 Page 4 of 4
426
Costa Mesa
Police Department
Costa Mesa PD Policy Manual
706.5 AB 481 EQUIPMENT INVENTORY

VEHICLES
(A) Mobile Command Vehicle (MCV): A vehicle used during critical incidents as a field- based command post, providing Incident Commanders with access to Department computer systems and dispatch center.
1 . Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities: 2021 Freightliner MT-55 chassis (custom built) vehicle, approximate cost: $1.2 Million, quantity: not to exceed 1. The MCV can also be utilized for SWAT/CNT and other critical incidents, significant, preplanned events, searching for missing persons, natural disasters, and community events. The MCV has redundant and supplemental communications capabilities increasing public safety interoperability during complex incidents or those requiring supplemental communications capabilities for coordination.
2 . Purpose: Used for critical incidents based on the circumstances of a specific event, large event, or natural disaster to effectively and efficiently serve the community.
3 . Authorized Use: Only officers trained in the use and deployment of the MCV shall drive the vehicle under the direction of the Chief of Police, Field Operations Captain, Support Services Captain, SWAT Commander, Watch Commander, or their designee. Situations where the MCV may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, natural disasters, special events, training, and emergencies.
4 . Lifespan: The MCV has an estimated lifespan of approximately 20-years; however, upgrades are required annually to maintain communications and IT systems.
5 . Fiscal Impact: The MCV was authorized in 2021 and purchased in 2022.

Annual maintenance costs are estimated to be approximately: $6,000.

Annual communication licensing, subscriptions, and required upgrades are estimated to be approximately: $6,000
6 . Training: Drivers/Operators shall receive safe handling and maneuvering training on a closed training course. Once the operator has shown competence in vehicle handling, the driver/operator will drive the vehicle with an experienced driver throughout the city.
7 . Legal and Procedural Rules: It is the policy of the Department to use the MCV in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy. (B) Armored Rescue Vehicles (ARVs): Commercially-produced, ballistic protected, wheeled vehicles designed for law enforcement purposes.

Policy
706
Attachment 14
427
1 . Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) Lenco BearCat, cost approximately: $318, 000, quantity: not to exceed

1. The Lenco BearCat is an armored rescue vehicle that provides its occupants with ballistic protection beyond ballistic shields or personal body armor. It offers greater safety to community members and officers during high-risk incidents. It is capable of seating a driver and approximately 7 passengers.
2 . Purpose: Used in response to critical incidents to enhance officers and community safety, improve scene containment and stabilization, and assist in resolving critical incidents. Additionally, ARVs may be deployed as displays for community outreach events.
3 . Authorized Use: ARV use shall be authorized by the Chief of Police, Division Commander, Watch Commander or SWAT Commander based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident. ARVs shall only be used by personnel trained in their deployment and in a manner consistent with Department policies/procedures. Situations where the ARVs may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, natural disasters, special events, training, and emergencies.
4 . Lifespan: The ARV has an estimated lifespan of approximately 20 years. 5 . Fiscal Impact:
(a) Lenco BearCat: Annual maintenance cost approximately: $4,000 6 . Training: All drivers/operators shall attend formalized instruction in vehicle operations, practical driving instruction, and deployment procedures. 7 . Legal and Procedural Rules: It is the policy of the department to use the ARV in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.

SPECIALIZED TACTICAL EQUIPMENT
(A) Tactical Robot: A remotely controlled, tracked, robot equipped with cameras and two-way audio communication capabilities.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities: IROBOT FASTPAC PACKBOT TACTICAL ROBOT, cost: on loan from US military, quantity: not to exceed 2. A remotely operated tactical robot providing officers with the ability to observe the interior of a structure without entering. This capability increases the safety of community members, officers, and suspects by providing the operator with the ability to observe and locate subjects without the risk of a face-to-face confrontation. Additionally, the remote, two- way, communication capability allows operators to de- escalate situations by negotiating the surrender of barricaded subjects.

2. Purpose: To be used during tactical incidents to safely search a structure without exposing officers and/or community members to the risk of a face-to- face confrontation.

3. Authorized Use: The tactical robot shall only be deployed by Department personnel trained in its use, and with the approval of the SWAT Commander, 428
Watch Commander, or their designee. Situations where the robots may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, natural disasters, special events, training, and emergencies.

4. Lifespan: The robot's lifespan is approximately 10 years.

5. Fiscal Impact: The iRobot FASTPAC Packbot was loaned to the Department in 2021. The Department paid approximately $500 in shipping costs. Annual maintenance cost of approximately: $200.

6. Training: All operators shall receive initial training before deploying the robot in the field.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department shall only use the robot pursuant to State and Federal Law and department policy. (B) Unmanned Aerial System (UAS): An unmanned aircraft and the associated equipment necessary to control it remotely.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) DJI Mini 2-6, approximate cost: $909 each, quantity: not to exceed 15.

Utilizing DJI's OcuSync 2.0 2.4/5.8 GHz wireless transmission technology, the Mini 2 can be operated from up to 6.2 miles distance from the operator while still providing video of what the drone records. The Mini 2 can also be flown as high as 2.5 miles and withstand 19 to 24 mph winds. The DJI Mini 3 is an upgrade from the DJI Mini 2. It features a Tri-Directional Obstacle Sensing (Forward/Backward/Downward), Record Up to 4K/60fps Video and 4K/30fps HDR Video, 34-min Max Flight Time, True Vertical Shooting, FocusTrack (ActiveTrack, Spotlight, and Point of Interest). This UAS is able to fly indoors unlike other UAS systems.
(b) Autel EVO II 640T, approximate cost: $5,400, quantity: not to exceed

4. The EVO II 640T features a high-resolution thermal camera, which enables the ability to capture incredible detail in dark environments, not previously possible on an aerial drone of this size. Thermal vision capabilities can be combined with the 8K/49MP visual camera for visual intelligence. 12 visual sensors provide omnidirectional obstacle avoidance.
(c) Autel EVO II Pro, approximate cost: $3,300 each, quantity: not to exceed 5. The EVO II Pro features a high resolution camera with the ability to capture incredible video and photo details. Twelve visual sensors provide omnidirectional obstacle avoidance.
(d) LOKI MK2, approximate cost: $6,500, quantity: not to exceed 3. LOKI is the world's first purpose-built tactical UAS. Designed and built in conjunction with several of the world's top counter-terror units, LOKI Mk2 solves virtually all of the problems associated with the tactical use of commercial UAS systems. LOKI is intended for close-quarter, indoor, and outdoor tactical scouting missions, and features a highly sensitive Night-Day + IR sensor camera giving it the ability to fly and see in complete darkness.
429
(e) DJI Mavic 3T, approximate cost: $3,889 quantity: not to exceed 4. The DJI Mavic 3T features a high-resolution thermal camera, which enables the ability to capture incredible detail in dark environments, not previously possible on an aerial drone of this size. Thermal vision capabilities can be combined with the 4K/60MP visual camera for visual intelligence. 12 visual sensors provide omnidirectional obstacle avoidance and dual tele cameras.
(f) DJI Avata Pro, approximate cost: $1,428, quantity: not to exceed 2. DJI Avata Pro Immersive Flight Experience, Intuitive Motion Control, 4K/60fps 155° Super-Wide FOV Videos, Powerful Video Stabilization, Enhanced Safety with Built-in Propeller Guard, 1080p/100fps video transmission quality: the lowest latency of 30 ms, Dual 1080p Micro-OLED Screens. Great for interior flying for high-risk situations. (g) DJI Matrice 300 RTK, approximate cost $20,000, quantity: not to exceed 2. DJI Matrice 300 RTK, would be used for Drone as a Frist Responder (DFR). DJI Matrice has a flight time of 55 minutes, 6- directional sensing and positing, night-vison FPV camera, max horizontal speed 51 MPH, Forward/Backward/Downward FOV, operating frequency 2.4/5.8GHz, 12-mile radius. Great for day-to-day operation and able to fly in harsh environments.
(h) Skydio X10, approximate cost $30,000, quantity: not to exceed

2. Skydio X10, would be used for Drone as a Frist Responder (DFR). Skydio X10 has a flight time of 40 minutes, max horizontal speed 45 MPH, Forward/Backward/Downward FOV, 7.5 mile radius, integrated with FLOCK safety cameras and AXON, controlled by remote or browser, and onboard AI capability. Great for day to day operation and able to fly in harsh environments.

2. Purpose: To be deployed when its capabilities would assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations, which include but are not limited to:
(a) Major collision investigations.
(b) Search for missing persons.
(c) Natural disaster management.
(d) Crime scene photography.
(e) SWAT, tactical, or other public safety and life preservation missions. (f) In response to specific requests from local, State, or Federal fire authorities for fire response and/or prevention.

3. Authorized Use: Only assigned operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate any UAS during approved missions.

Situations where UASs may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, natural disasters, special events, training, and emergencies.

4. Lifespan: All UAS equipment has an estimated lifespan of approximately 3-5 years.

5. Fiscal Impact: The Department is in the process of identifying a funding 430
source for the UAS program, including an application for grant funding. The estimated annual cost of the UAS program maintenance is approximately $10,000.

6. Training: All Department UAS operators will be licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration for UAS operation. In addition, each operator must attend ongoing monthly training.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only deploy the UAS for official law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law and department policy. (C) NIGHT VISION (NVGs): Optical device to increase an officer’s ability to see at night or in low-light conditions.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities: MUM-14XR-5 night vision monocular, cost: on loan from US military, quantity: not to exceed 40. The MUM-14XR-5 is a high performance modular, hand-held passive night vision monocular device that utilizes a single Generation III intensifier tube to provide crisp, clear images under the darkest conditions. The monocular "single tube / single eyepiece" approach to night vision missions is based upon the proven concept that independent use of each eye maximizes the ability of the user to operate under a wide range of low light conditions and maintain maximum situational awareness.

2. Purpose: To be deployed when its view would assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations, which include but are not limited to:
(a) Search for missing persons.
(b) Natural disaster management.
(c) SWAT, tactical, or other public safety and life preservation missions.

3. Authorized Use: NVGs shall only be used by trained members of the Department's SWAT Team during situations that include but are not limited to the following:
(a) By officers who have been trained in their proper use (b) In hostage and barricaded subject situations
(c) In high-risk warrant (search/arrest) services where there may be extreme hazards to officers
(d) During other high-risk situations where their use would enhance officer safety and the safety of community members
(e) During training exercises

4. Lifespan: Is approximately 10 years

5. Fiscal Impact: Loaned from US military. No annual maintenance costs.

6. Training: All Department members who have been issued NVG’s will train with them on an annual basis.
431

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only utilize NVGs for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law and department policy.
(D) Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD): The LRAD is a high-intensity directional acoustical array for long-range, crystal clear hailing, notification, and an unmistakable warning tone. The LRAD is primarily used as a communication device.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities: LRAD 100x, approximate cost: $10,703.56, quantity: not to exceed 1. Self-contained, portable, and featuring an extended voice broadcast range out to 600 meters, the LRAD 100X ensures voice messages are clearly heard and understood. LRAD's optimized driver, waveguide, and power efficiency technologies enable the LRAD 100X to provide several hours of clear, continuous communication from a single battery charge.

2. Purpose: To be used to issue dispersal orders during crowd and riot control situations or to address the public in the event of civil emergencies, natural disasters, evacuations, and police incidents (e.g., missing persons, perimeters for wanted suspects/K9 deployments, etc.). The LRAD may also be used to issue a warning tone.

3. Authorized Use: LRADs shall only be used by personnel trained in its deployment and used in a manner consistent with State and Federal law and training.

4. Lifespan: LRADs have an estimated lifespan of approximately 25 years.

5. Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance cost of approximately $300.

6. Training: All operators receive training before operating any LRADs in the field.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department shall only utilize the LRAD for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law and department policy.

LESS-LETHAL DEVICES
(A) 40MM Launchers and Munitions: 40MM launchers are utilized by Department personnel as a less-lethal tool to deploy less-lethal impact munitions and chemical agents.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY Single Shot 40MM Launcher, #1300, approximate cost: $1,000, quantity: not to exceed 100. The 40MM Single Launcher is a tactical single-shot launcher that has an Integrated Front Grip (IFG), equipped with an EOTech holographic sight system It will fire standard 40mm less-lethal ammunition, up to 4.8 inches in cartridge length. It will launch a 40MM less-lethal round up to 131 feet. (b) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY Tactical 4-Shot 40MM Launcher, #1440.

Cost approximately $1,800. Quantity: not to exceed 6. Designed for riot 432
and tactical situations, the Defense Technology 1440 40mm Tactical 4- Shot Launcher is low-profile and lightweight, providing multi-shot capability in an easy to carry launcher. It features the Rogers Super Stoc expandable gun stock, an adjustable Picatinny mounted front grip, and a unique direct-drive system to advance the magazine cylinder. It is equipped with a EOTech holographic sight system.
(c) B&T GL06 BT-31000-A Single Shot 40MM Launcher approximate cost:
$1,400 each, quantity: not to exceed 4. Designed from the ground up for lightweight, accurate, and rapid deployment, the B&T GL06 launcher and SIR (Safe Impact Round) ammunition family is the state of the art in a point-of-aim/point-of-impact “less lethal” system created specifically for public order, law enforcement and peacekeeping operations. Rifled Barrel for Precision Accuracy, Folding Stock, Familiar Ergonomic Controls, Multiple Picatinny Accessory Rails. Color: Black, material:

Polymer / Aluminum. Caliber: 40mm, Barrel Length: 11", Twist Rate:
1:47, Length: 15.2-23.5 ", Weight 4.6 Lbs, Action: Single Shot. (d) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM EXACT IMPACT SPONGE, #6325, cost approximately: $20, quantity: not to exceed 500. A less lethal 40mm lightweight plastic and foam projectile fired from a single or multi- round purpose-built 40mm launcher with a rifled barrel at 325 FPS. The 30-gram foam projectile delivers 120 ft/ lbs. of energy on impact. The 40mm Exact Impact Sponge Round provides accurate and effective performance when fired from the approved distance of not less than ten (10) feet and as far as 131 feet from the target.
(e) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT CS CRUSHABLE FOAM ROUND, #6320, cost approximately: $18, quantity: not to exceed 60. A less lethal 40MM lightweight plastic and crushable foam projectile fired from a single or multi-round purpose-built 40mm launcher with a rifled barrel at 295 FPS. The 39-gram crushable foam projectile delivers 120 ft./lbs. of energy upon impact in addition to the dispersion of 5 grams of CS irritant. The 40mm Direct Impact CS Round provides accurate and effective performance when fired from the approved distance of not less than ten (10) feet and as far as 120 feet from the target. Only trained members of the Department's SWAT Team are authorized to deploy the 40mm Direct Impact CS round. (f) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, DIRECT IMPACT MARKING
CRUSHABLE FOAM ROUND, # 6326,cost approximately: $21,
quantity: not to exceed 50. A less lethal 40MM lightweight plastic and foam projectile with a green marking agent, fired from a single or multi- round purpose built 40MM launcher with a rifled barrel at 325 FPS. The 30-gram foam projectile delivers up to 120 ft./lbs. of energy upon impact. The 40MM Direct Impact Marking Crushable Foam Round provides accurate and effective performance when fired from the approved distance of not less than then (10) feet and as far as 131 feet from the target. Only trained members of the Department's SWAT Team are authorized to deploy the 40mm Marking Round.
433
(g) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, EXACT IMPACT LE 40MM EXTENDED
RANGE SPONGE ROUND, #6325LE, cost approximately: $25,
quantity: not to exceed 50. A less lethal 40mm lightweight plastic and foam projectile fired from a single or multi-round purpose-built 40mm launcher with a rifled barrel at 400 FPS. The 40mm Exact Impact Extended Range Sponge Round provides accurate and effective performance when fired from the approved distance of not less than 33 feet, and as far as 230 feet from the target. Only trained members of the Department's SWAT Team are authorized to deploy the 40mm Extended Range Sponge Round.
(h) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM FERRET POWDER BARRICADE
ROUND, CS, #1292, cost approximately: $25, quantity: not to exceed

50. The Ferret 40 mm Barricade Penetrating Round is filled with a CS powder chemical agent. It is a frangible projectile that is spin-stabilized, utilizing fins and barrel rifling. It is non-burning and used by tactical teams to penetrate barriers and deliver a chemical agent. Only trained members of the Department's SWAT Team are authorized to deploy the 40mm Ferret Powder Barricade Round.
(i) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM FERRET LIQUID BARRICADE
ROUND, CS, #1262, cost approximately: $25, quantity: not to exceed

20. The Ferret 40 mm Barricade Penetrating Round is filled with a CS liquid chemical agent. It is a frangible projectile that is spin-stabilized, utilizing fins and barrel rifling. It is non-burning and used by tactical teams to penetrate barriers and deliver a chemical agent. Only trained members of the Department's SWAT Team are authorized to deploy the 40mm Ferret Liquid Barricade Round.
(j) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY Single Shot 40MM Launcher, #1425, cost approximately: $1,000, quantity: not to exceed 100. The 40MM Single Launcher is a tactical single-shot launcher that features an expandable Rogers Super Stoc and adjustable Integrated Front Grip (IFG), equipped with an EOTech holographic sight system. It will fire standard 40mm less-lethal ammunition, up to 4.8 inches in cartridge length. It will launch a 40MM less-lethal round up to 131 feet.

8. Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where the employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable.

9. Authorized Use: Situations where the deployment of less-lethal impact or chemical munitions are authorized include but are not limited to:
(a) Self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals (b) Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents where the criminal behavior involved exceeds a failure to disburse or curfew violation. (c) Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained (d) Vicious animals
(e) Training exercises or approved demonstrations

434
(f) Tactical situations involving the deployment of the Department's SWAT Team including, but not limited to barricaded subjects.

10. Lifespan:
(a) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY Single Shot Launcher is approximately 20 years
(b) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY Tactical 4-Shot Launcher is approximately 20 years
(c) All munitions listed above are approximately 5 years

11. Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance for the 40MM launchers is approximately $50 each.

12. Training: Personnel deploying less-lethal or chemical agents will be trained in their use and deployment before using them in the field. All training will be conducted by a POST-certified less-lethal or chemical agent instructor.

13. Legal and Procedural Rules: It is the department’s policy to use all less- lethal devices and associated munitions in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.
(E) PepperBall Launcher and Munitions: A less-lethal device that discharges projectiles designed to breach glass or projectiles containing chemical agents

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) PepperBall FTC Launcher, cost approximately: $510 each, quantity: not to exceed 10. Semi- automatic launcher system with a firing rate of 10- 12 RPS. Compact lightweight modular design. Ambidextrous rotational safety switch. 30 cubic inch high capacity high-pressure air system.

Designed for use with high-pressure air.
(b) PepperBall INERT Powder Projectiles, cost approximately: $300 for a case of 375, quantity: not to exceed 6 cases. Inert projectiles used for training purposes.
(c) PepperBall LIVE-X PAVA / Oleoresin Capsicum (OC), cost approximately: $1,100 for a case of 375, quantity: not to exceed 4 cases. Contains a powerful concentration of PAVA pepper powder. One round of LIVE-X™ contains the equivalent to 10 regular PepperBall rounds.

2. Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for the use of PepperBall may include, but are not limited to:
(a) Tactical situations involving the deployment of the Department's SWAT Team
(b) Training exercises or approved demonstrations
(c) Potentially vicious animals
(d) Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained 435
(e) Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents
(f) Self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals

3. Authorized Use: Only officers who have received certification in the use of PepperBall are authorized to use PepperBall. Situations where the PepperBall may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, emergencies, and training.

4. Lifespan:
(a) PepperBall FTC Launcher approximately 20 years
(b) All PepperBall projectiles have a lifespan of approximately 3 years.

5. Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance for the PepperBall launchers is approximately $50.

6. Training: Only officers who have been properly trained will be permitted to deploy and use PepperBall.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only deploy PepperBall for law enforcement purposes and in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.
(F) Chemical Agent and Smoke Canisters: Canisters that disburse chemical agents and/or smoke when deployed.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, RIOT CONTROL CS gas, #1082, cost approximately: $41, quantity: not to exceed 100. The Riot Control CS is a continuous discharge canister. This canister can be hand thrown or launched from a fired delivery system. The canister is 6.0in. by 2.35 in. and holds an approximately 2.7 oz. of active agent payload. It has an approximate burn time of 20-40 seconds.
(b) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, FLAMELESS TRI-CHAMBER CS
CANISTER, #1032, cost approximately; $32, quantity: not to exceed

10. The Tri-Chamber Flameless CS canister design allows the contents to burn within an internal can and disperse the agent safely with reduced risk of fire. The canister is designed primarily for indoor tactical situations to detect and/or dislodge a barricaded subject. This canister will deliver approximately .70 ounces of agent during its 20-25 seconds burn time. The Tri-Chamber Flameless canister can be used in crowd control and tactical deployment situations by Law Enforcement and Corrections but was designed with the barricade situation in mind. Its applications in tactical situations are primarily to detect and/or dislodge barricaded subjects. The purpose of the Tri- Chamber Flameless canister is to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort, and/or incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects. The Tri-Chamber Flameless canister provides the option of delivering a pyrotechnic chemical device indoors, maximizing the chemicals' effectiveness via heat and vaporization while minimizing or negating the chance of fire to the structure.
436
(c) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, POCKET TACTICAL CANISTER, CS,
#1016, cost approximately: $23, quantity: not to exceed 100. The Pocket Tactical CS Canister is small and lightweight. The 0.9 oz. of active agent will burn approximately 20-40 seconds. At 4.75 in. by 1.4 inches in size, it easily fits in most tactical pouches. Though this device is slightly over four inches in length, it produces a smoke cloud so fast it appears to be an enveloping screen produced by a full-size tactical canister.
(d) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, MAXIMUM SMOKE CANISTER, #1073,
cost approximately: $35, quantity: not to exceed 25. The Maximum Smoke canister is specifically designed for outdoor use in a crowd control capacity with a high volume of continuous burn that expels its payload in approximately 1.5 minutes through four gas ports located on top of the canister. This can be used to conceal tactical movement or re-route a crowd.

2. Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for the use of the less-lethal canisters may include, but are not limited to:
(a) Self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals (b) Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents
(c) Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained (d) Potentially vicious animals
(e) Training exercises or approved demonstrations
(f) Tactical situations involving the deployment of the Department's SWAT Team

3. Authorized Use: Only SWAT officers who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents.

Situations where the chemical agents may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, emergencies, and training.

4. Lifespan: Approximately 5 years from manufacturing date.

5. Fiscal Impact: No annual maintenance costs

6. Training: SWAT Team members utilizing chemical agent canisters are certified by POST less lethal and chemical agents instructors.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only deploy chemical agents for law enforcement purposes and in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.

SPECIALTY MUNITIONS
(A) Breaching Shotguns and Munitions: Shotguns and specialty munitions utilized to access secured structures when no other means have proven successful.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) REMINGTON 870 BREACHING SHOTGUN, cost approximately:
437
$500, quantity 2: not to exceed 2. The breaching shotgun is a standard patrol issue shotgun that is shortened to improve maneuverability in a tactical environment.
(b) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, TKO 12-GAUGE BREACHING ROUND,
cost approximately: $7, quantity: not to exceed 100. The 12-Gauge TKO Breaching Round is a 12-Gauge shell loaded with a compressed zinc slug, utilizing smokeless powder as a propellant. It is a widely used method to breach door locks or hinges for entry during tactical operations. When properly deployed, the TKO can defeat door lock mechanisms, doorknobs, hinges, deadbolts, safety chains, and padlocks on both wooden and hollow core doors. Upon impact with the target, the zinc slug disintegrates into a fine powder eliminating fragmentation.

2. Purpose: Used to defeat locking mechanisms on doors or gates when mechanical breaching is ineffective or not feasible due to environmental factors.

3. Authorized Use: Breaching shotguns and munitions shall only be utilized by trained members of the Department's SWAT Team and only with the approval of the Incident Commander, SWAT Commander, or their designee during tactical incidents or training exercises.

4. Lifespan:
(a) Remington Breaching Shotguns approximately 25 years (b) TKO 12-Gauge Breaching Round approximately 5 years

5. Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance of shotguns, approximately $100

6. Training: All SWAT Team members deploying breaching shotguns and munitions shall receive initial training before utilizing them in the field.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only utilize breaching shotguns and munitions for official law enforcement purposes in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.
(B) Noise Flash Diversionary Devices (NFDD): A device used to distract or divert a person's attention.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities: DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY LOW-ROLL NON-RELOADABLE DISTRACTION DEVICE, #8902NR cost approximately: $42, quantity: not to exceed 100. A non-bursting, non- fragmenting single-bang device that produces a thunderous bang with intense bright light. Ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry, or other high-risk arrest situations.

2. Purpose: A diversionary device is ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry, or other high-risk arrest situations. To produce atmospheric overpressure and brilliant white light and, as a result, can cause short-term (6 - 8 seconds) physiological/psychological, sensory deprivation to give officers a tactical advantage.

3. Authorized Use: Diversionary Devices shall only be used by trained 438
members of the Department's SWAT Team during situations that include but are not limited to the following:
(a) By officers who have been trained in their proper use (b) In hostage and barricaded subject situations
(c) In high-risk warrant (search/arrest) services where there may be extreme hazards to officers
(d) During other high-risk situations where their use would enhance officer safety
(e) During training exercises

4. Lifespan: Until deployed

5. Fiscal Impact: No annual maintenance

6. Training: Prior to use, officers must attend diversionary device training conducted by Post certified instructors.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only utilize NFDDs for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law and department policy.

FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION
(A) Rifles: Shoulder-fired firearms, with long spirally grooved barrels, intended to cause projectiles to spin, improving accuracy over a long distance.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) COLT LAW ENFORCEMENT CARBINE 5.56mm (.223 Rem) PATROL RIFLE (6920) equipped with an EO-Tech Holographic sight, tactical light, and sling, cost approximately: $1,588, quantity: not to exceed 100.

Action: Gas Operated Semi-Auto, Caliber: 223 Remington/5.56 NATO, Barrel Length: 16.1", Capacity: 30+1, Trigger: Standard, Safety:

Reversible Safety Selector, Weight: 6.95 lbs, Stock: Black 4-Position Collapsible, Metal Finish: Black, Muzzle: A2 Flash Hider, Receiver Material: 7075-T6 Aluminum, Sights: A2 Front, Barrel Description:

Chrome-Lined, Twist: 1:7" Purpose: Duty \ Range, Finish: Black, Overall Length: 32” to 35” Features: Front Barrel Lug/ Ejection Port Cover, Effective Range: 400m
(b) COLT M4 CARBINE COMMANDO (R0933) / CQB (LE6946) 5.56mm (.223 Rem) SWAT RIFLE equipped with an EO-Tech holographic sight, tactical light, and sling, cost approximately: $1,300, quantity: not to exceed 30. Action: Gas Operated Full-Auto, Caliber: 223 Remington /5.56 NATO, Barrel Length: 10.3" or 11.5”, Capacity: 30+1, Trigger:

Standard, Safety: Reversible Safety Selector, Weight: 6.25 lbs, Stock:

Black 4-Position Collapsible, Metal Finish: Black, Muzzle: A2 Flash Hider, Receiver Material: 7075-T6 Aluminum, Sights: A2 Front, Barrel Description: Chrome-Lined, Twist: 1:7" Purpose: Duty \ Range, Finish:

Black, Overall Length: 26” to 29.5” Features: Front Barrel Lug/ Ejection 439
Port Cover, Effective Range: 400m.
(c) SIG SAUER MPX SWAT 9mm SUBMACHINE GUN equipped with EO- Tech holographic sight, tactical light, and sling. Cost approximately:
$1,800, Quantity: not to exceed 20. Action: Short Stroke Piston, Full- Auto, Caliber: 9mm NATO (9x19mm), Barrel Length: 8”, Capacity:
30+1, Trigger: Standard, Safety: Ambidextrous Safety Selector, Weight: 5.6 lbs, Stock: Folding or 5 Position telescoping, Metal Finish:

Black, Muzzle: A1 Flash Hider, Receiver Material: 7075-T6 Aluminum, Sights: folding front and rear, Barrel Twist: 1:10" Purpose: Duty \ Range, Finish: Black, Overall Length: 26” Effective Range: 200m. (d) COLT LE6943 5.56 (.223 Rem.) TRAFFIC / PATROL RIFLE equipped with EOTech holographic sight and sling, cost approximately: $1,700, quantity: not to exceed 20. The LE6943 displays fresh ingenuity with Mil-Spec hammer and trigger pivot pins, 11.5-inch barrel, a Magpul MBUS backup sight and a folding front sight for enhanced optical solutions, and a straight gas tube and a removable lower rail, which provides modularity for under mounting accessories. The patented one- piece monolithic upper receiver incorporates a continuous Mil-Spec rail from the rear of the upper receiver to the front sight. This feature affords unmatched repeatability for mounting optical systems, not found with separate handguard rail systems. Designed with accuracy in mind, its true free-floating barrel provides the enhanced accuracy necessary for long-range acquisition capability.
(e) DANIEL DEFENSE DD5 V3 RIFLE 7.62x51mm (.308 WIN) equipped with a telescopic or holographic sight, tactical light, and sling, cost approximately: $2,123, quantity: not to exceed 4. Action: Gas Operated Semi-Automatic, Caliber 7.62 x 51 mm, Barrel length 12.5”, Overall Length: 33” – 37”, Weight: 8.3 lbs, Magazine Capacity: 20 rounds, Barrel Specifications: 1:10 Twist, hammer-forged and chrome lined.

2. Purpose: Used as precision weapons to address threats that exceed the capability of the Department's standard-issue handgun.

3. Authorized Use: Only members POST certified in the use of the rifle are authorized to deploy them in the field. Situations where rifles may be used include to prevent serious bodily injury or death to self or others and during training.

4. Lifespan:
(a) COLT LAW ENFORCEMENT CARBINE PATROL RIFLE
approximately: 15 years
(b) COLT M4 CARBINE COMMANDO / CQB SWAT RIFLE approximately:
10 years
(c) SIG SAUER MPX SWATSUBMACHINE GUN approximately: 10 years (d) COLT LE6943 TRAFFIC PATROL RIFLE approximately: 15 years (e) DANIEL DEFENSE DD5 V3 RIFLE approximately 10 years
440

5. Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance for each rifle is approximately $50

6. Training: Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a range qualification two times a year.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The department will use rifles in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy. .

8. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) WINCHESTER .223/5.56 55-grain RANGER SOFT-POINT RIFLE ROUND, cost approximately: $607 per case of 1000, quantity: not to exceed 30 cases. Winchester ammunition features a lead core 55-grain non-corrosive, soft-point bullet in a reloadable brass casing. (b) WINCHESTER .223/5.56 55-grain NATO M193 RIFLE ROUND, cost approximately: $378 per case of 1000, quantity: not to exceed 30 cases.

Winchester ammunition features a lead core 55-grain full metal jacket, non-corrosive boxer primer, in a reloadable brass casing. (c) WINCHESTER.223/5.56 FRANGIBLE TRAINING AMMUNITION, cost approximately: $285 per case of 200, quantity: not to exceed 30 cases.

Winchester Frangible .223 Remington ammunition is loaded with a 55- grain Reduced Hazard Training (RHT) bullet. BallistiClean features frangible Reduced Hazard Training bullets that break-up immediately on contact with metal targets, significantly reducing ricochet and backlash danger. BallistiClean loads feature a copper-plated primer and a "NT" (non-toxic) headstamp to clearly identify BallistiClean as a training round at a glance, eliminating confusion with duty rounds. With this Federal ammunition range operators have no hazardous waste disposal problems and it meets or exceeds all OSHA and EPA standards.

9. Purpose: To be used in Department rifles to address lethal threats to the community and Department personnel with greater accuracy, enhancing community safety.

10. Authorized Use: Only members POST certified in the use of the rifle are authorized to utilize rifle ammunition.

11. Fiscal Impact: The Department spends approximately $25,000 annually for all Department firearm ammunition.

12. Lifespan: The ammunition listed above does not have an expiration date.

13. Training: Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a range qualification two times a year.

14. Legal and Procedural Rules: The department will use ammunition in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.

441

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 25-302 Meeting Date: 6/3/2025
TITLE:

ONE YEAR USE AGREEMENT FOR JACK HAMMETT SPORTS COMPLEX WITH UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES (UCLA) FOOTBALL ATHLETICS, FOR 2025 PRE-SEASON

TRAINING CAMP
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
PRESENTED BY: ALMA REYES, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER
CONTACT INFORMATION: ALMA REYES, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, (714) 754-5099 RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the Acting City Manager to execute a Use Agreement for the City's Jack Hammett Sports Complex for a portion of UCLA’s 2025 Summer Training Camp and related community benefits (Attachment 1).

BACKGROUND:

The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), a California public university, has approached the City of Costa Mesa regarding the use of Jack Hammett Sports Complex (Complex) for a portion of their 2025 Summer Training Camp (Camp). Similarly, to National Football League (NFL) teams, UCLA desires to operate a summer training camp to prepare its team for the upcoming season. After exploring various location options, UCLA requested the use of the City's Complex for a portion of their 2025 pre-season Training Camp operations.

Throughout the year, the City reviews Special Events Permits and Use Agreements for many different parks and facilities for non-profit groups, businesses, and individuals. In the past, the City's Jack Hammett Sports Complex has been used for various tournaments, events, and practices.

In 2010, the University of Alabama football team had exclusive use of the site for their preparations for the national championship game that was played at the Rose Bowl. In addition, the Complex hosted the University of Florida State football team in 2014 when they were playing in the national championship game. Both of these teams became the national champions in those respective years.

In 2017, the City entered into a 10-year Use Agreement with the Los Angeles Chargers to conduct their annual Summer Training Camps through 2026 at the Complex at an annual cost of $150,570.

The Chargers also invested approximately $1 million into the fields to bring them to NFL standards, among other community benefits. In 2022, the Chargers notified the City that their 2023 Summer Training Camp would likely be its last year at the Complex as they would be transitioning to a new training facility in El Segundo, California.

In March of 2024, the Los Angeles Chargers confirmed they would not be utilizing the City’sComplex

Page 1 of 3 ends

Costa Mesa City CouncilJune 3, 2025

Costa Mesa City Council
June 3, 2025