CO
OPERATIVE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITIES
OF SANTA ANA, COSTA MESA, AND NEWPORT BEACH FOR
THE BRISTOL STREET CORRIDOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL
SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT
This Cooperative Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this day of , 2026 , by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a charter city (“SANTA ANA”), the CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation (“ COSTA MESA ”), and the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a municipal corporation (“NEWPORT BEACH”).
REC
ITALS:
A. Sant
a Ana, with cooperation from Costa Mesa and Newport Beach, applied for a grant from the Orange County Transportation Authority (“OCTA”) as part of Renewed Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (“RTSSP”) (Project P), aimed to coordinate traffic signals across multiple jurisdictions to enhance countywide traffic flow and reduce congestion.
B. Th
e Bristol Street Corridor Traffic Signal Synchronization Project was selected by OCTA as one of the RTSSP Projects to be funded in OCTA Fiscal Year 2025-2026. The project will include timing implementation and improvements at traffic signals along Bristol Street, from State Route 22 Eastbound Ramp in Santa Ana to Jamboree Road in Newport Beach, as listed in the P roject Application attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference.
C. The
total budget for the project is $4,218,657. Of this total, 80% ($3,374,925.60) is funded by the OCTA Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program and 20% ($ 843,731.40) through local agency’s matching funds. The breakdown is shown in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
D. Sant
a Ana, Costa Mesa and Newport Beach agree to provide twenty percent (20%) matching funds for the total project cost. Matching funds can be a combination of cash and in-kind match as defined by the RTSSP grant.
E. OC
TA and Santa Ana have entered into a Master Funding Agreement “Cooperative Agreement No. C-1-2783” defining the terms and conditions for approved Measure M2 projects that will be implemented by Santa Ana.
F. Sant
a Ana agrees to serve as the lead agency to oversee the design and implementation of the project.
G. Sant
a Ana, Costa Mesa and Newport Beach desire to enter into this Cooperative Agreement to demonstrate their commitment to implement the project and improve inter- jurisdiction traffic signal synchronization on Bristol Street.
H. Th
is Cooperative Agreement defines the specific terms, conditions and funding responsibilities between Santa Ana, Costa Mesa and Newport Beach for the implementation of the project.
ATTACHMENT 1
1 NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed by and between SANTA ANA, COSTA MESA, and NEWPORT BEACH as follows:
I. SC OPE:
This Agreement specifies the roles and responsibilities of the cities as they pertain to the subjects and projects addressed herein. The project is specifically detailed in the Project Application attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. All of the cities agree that each will cooperate and coordinate with the other in all activities covered by this Agreement and any other supplemental agreements that may be required to facilitate purposes thereof.
II. M
UTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES:
Santa Ana, Costa Mesa and Newport Beach mutually agree to:
a. Designate a lead staff to act as the liaison for the project. The liaison and any other project personnel, if necessary, will attend and participate in all related project meetings.
b. Participate, cooperate and coordinate with contractors, consultants, vendors and staff in good faith using reasonable efforts to resolve any unforeseen issues and disputes arising out of the project to the extent practicable with respect to the performance of the project.
c. Maintain project related traffic signals and telecommunications equipment with high priority during the project, and be responsible for repair of their own signal control systems in each of their respective jurisdictions.
d. Provide on-site support for signal control systems, timing plans, detection systems and related equipment during construction, installation and integration , and be available to change or make adjustments to timing plans when necessitated by the project.
e. Document in-kind match or dollar match funding as identified in the project application, and provide verification of such expenditures as part of any review or audit process, which may include payroll records, contracts and purchase orders.
f. Monitor and operate the project traffic signals and improvements within its jurisdiction for a period of two (2) years following the completion of the Primary Implementation Phase of the project, as required by the program funding.
g. Coordinate the inclusion of other improvements and in- kind services, where necessary, that the owning agency requires for the implementation of the project, but are not included in the project application. The owning agency shall be responsible for the inclusion of such elements within reason and at its own costs.
h. Unused project funds for improvements from one City can be used by another City (with matching fund responsibility) upon mutual consent of the involved Cities.
III. R
ESPONSIBILITIES OF SANTA ANA:
2 S
anta Ana agrees to the following responsibilities:
a. S
anta Ana shall serve as lead agency for design, construction and construction management of the project , and shall provide oversight by establishing milestones and overseeing the project development to ensure that all standards and requirements set forth by the agreement is adhered to.
b. S
anta Ana shall be responsible for completing the project in accordance with the funding guidelines and any and all other OCTA requirements related to these funding programs.
Santa Ana shall maintain coordination with all participating agencies throughout the duration of the project.
c.
Santa Ana shall provide staff, consultants, and contractors deemed necessary and appropriate to manage, administer, coordinate, and oversee timing implementation, engineering design, bid and award, and construction management of the project. d. S
anta Ana shal l enter into an agreement with a qualified consultant and contractor to assist in the completion and monitoring of the project. e. S
anta Ana shall enter into any required Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans regarding Caltrans Improvements in cities; to comply with all the terms and conditions of said Cooperative Agreement; to pay invoices for such Caltrans Improvements as required by Caltrans; and to invoice participating agencies in a timely manner with detail ed
doc
umentation of said Caltrans Improvements.
f. S
anta Ana shall coordinate the work effort of this Project, provide the day to day management of the consultant and manage all consultant administration and contracting.
Santa Ana shall review the consultant’s invoices and pay them accordingly after ensurin g
t
hat the work has been adequately performed by the consultant. g. S
anta Ana shall provide its share of matching fund as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, a s
i
dentified in the project application.
h. U
pon issuance of a Notice to Proceed to the Consultant, Santa Ana can issue invoices to C
osta Mesa and Newport Beach for up to 80% of the cash match amount identified in Exhibit A. The remaining cash match amount will be invoiced after completion of t he P
rimary Implementation Phase of the project.
i. S
anta Ana shall comply with all of the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Agreement with OCTA, including the Project Reporting and Audit Requirements contained therein.
I
V. R ESPONSIBILITIES O F COSTA MESA,
C
osta Mesa agrees to the following responsibilities:
a. C
osta Mesa shall provide its share of matching funds as shown in Exhibit A. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application. 3 b. C
osta Mesa shall provide Construction Inspection on all improvements within its jurisdiction. No additional compensation from the project is provided for providi ng i
nspection services.
c. C
osta Mesa shall waive all costs and fees related to any and all permits , if such permits are required to perform any project related work within its jurisdiction.
V. RESPONSIBILITIES OF NE WPORT BEACH:
N
ewport Beach agrees to the following responsibilities:
a. N
ewport Beach shall provide its share of matching funds as shown in Exhibit A. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application. b. N
ewport Beach shall provide Construction Inspection on all improvements within its jurisdiction. No additional compensation from the project is provided for providin g i
nspection services.
c. N
ewport Beach shall waive all costs and fees related to any and all permits, if such permits are required to perform any project related work within its jurisdiction.
VI
. COMPLETE AGREEMENT:
a. T
his Agreement, including any attachments incorporated herein and made applicable by reference, constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement between SANTA ANA, COSTA MESA and NEWPORT BEACH and it supersedes all prior representations, understandings and communications between the parties. The invalidity in whole or in part of any term or condition of this Agreement shall not affect the validity of other term(s) or conditions(s) of this Agreement. The above referenced Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein. b. A
ny modification of this Agreement shall only be by amendment upon written mutual consent of all cities. All modifications, amendments, changes and revisions of this Agreement in whole or in part, and from time to time, shall be binding upon the cities so long as the same shall be in writing and executed by each agency. c. A par
ty’s failure to insist on any instance(s) of any other party’s performance of any term(s) or condition(s) of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the non-enforcing party’s right to such performance or to future performance of such term(s) or condition(s), and the nonperforming party’s obligation in respect thereto shall continue in full force and effect. Changes to any portion of this Agreement shall not be binding upon either party except when specifically confirmed in writing by way of a written amendment to this Agreement between the parties and issued in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
V
II. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION:
4 a. Each city shall jointly and severally indemnify, defend and hold harmless each other city, it’s officers, directors, employees and agents from and against any and all claims for any loss or damages, bodily injuries, damage to, or loss of property caused by the negl igent acts, omissions or willful misconduct by that city , its officers, directors, employees or agents in connection with or arising out of the performance of this Agreement.
b. Each city shall maintain adequate levels of insurance, or self -insurance to assure full indemnification of each other city.
VIII. A DDITIONAL PROVISIONS :
a. Term of Agreement: This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2031 . This Agreement may be extended at the mutual consent of all parties in writing.
b. SANTA ANA, COSTA MESA and NEWPORT BEACH hereto affirm that they are authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that, by so executing this Agreement, the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement.
c. Severability: If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, to any extent, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
d. Counterparts of Agreement: This Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute the same agreement. Facsimile and electronic signatures will be permitted.
e. In the event that the project costs exce ed the estimates submitted in the Project Application as prepared, all parties agree to meet and determine project revisions to meet the budget , or a revised funding proposal by the cities that shall be documented and submitted in writing as a revision to the Agreement.
f. The parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, ordinances and regulations of any governmental agency having jurisdiction over the project.
g. Force Majeure: Any p arty shall be excused from performing its obligations under this Agreement during the time and to the extent that it is prevented from performing by an unforeseeable cause beyond its control, including, but not limited to: any incidence of fire, flood; acts of God; commandeering of material, products, plants or facilities by the federal, state or local government; national fuel shortage; or , a material act or omission by the other party; when satisfactory evidence of such cause is presented to the other parties , and provided further that such nonperformance is unforeseeable, beyond the control and is not due to the fault or negligence of the party not performing.
h. Assignment: Neither this Agreement, nor any of the p arties’ rights, obligations, or duties hereunder may be assigned in whole or in part by any p arty without the prior written 5 consent of all the other parties in their sole and absolute discretion. Any such attempt of assignment shall be deemed void and of no force and effect. Consent to one assignment shall not be deemed consent to any subsequent assignment, nor the waiver of any right to consent to such subsequent assignment.
i. Obligations To Comply with Law: Nothing herein shall be deemed nor construed to authorize or require any p arty to issue bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness under the terms, in amounts, or for purposes other than as authorized by local, state or federal law.
j. Governing Law: The laws of the State of California and applicable local and federal laws, regulations and guidelines shall govern this Agreement.
k. Litigation fees: Should litigation arise out of this Agreement for the performance thereof, the court shall award costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees, to the prevailing party.
l. Notices: Any notices, requests, or demands made between the parties pursuant to this Agreement are to be directed as follows:
City of Santa Ana
Public Works Agency
20 Civic Center Plaza, M-43
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Cesar Rodriguez
Sr. Civil Engineer
(714) 647-5626
[email protected]
City of Costa Mesa
Public Works Department
77 Fair Drive,
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Ramin Nikoui
Senior Engineer
714-754-5184
[email protected]
City of Newport Beach
Public Works Department
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Kevin Riley
Transportation Manager/City Traffic Engineer
949-644-3329
[email protected]
IX. DE
L EGATED AUTHORITY:
The actions required to be taken by the cities in the implementation of this Agreement are delegated to its City Manager or equivalent designee.
6 [SIGNATURES ON SUBSEQUENT PAGES]
7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written:
CITY OF SANTA ANA:
ALVARO NUÑEZ
City Manager
ATTEST:
JENNIFER L. HALL
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By:
KYLE NELLESEN
Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
RODOLFO ROSAS, P.E.
Acting Executive Director
Public Works Agency
8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written:
CITY OF COSTA MESA:
Cecilia Gallardo-Daly
City Manager
ATTEST:
Brenda Green
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kimberly Hall Barlow
City Attorney
9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH:
David A. Webb
Public Works Director
ATTEST:
Lena Shumway
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Aaron C. Harp
City Attorney
10 EXHIBIT A
BR
ISTOL STREET CORRIDOR RTSSP
PROJECT FUNDS BREAKDOWN
Agency
Project Funds by
Agency*
M2 Grant
(80%)
Local Match (20%)
Total Match**
Match Type
Cash In-kind
1 Santa
Ana
PI $2,180,869.00 $1,744,695.20 $436,173.80 $396,173.80 $40,000.00 O&M $67,200.00 $53,760 $13,440.00 $13,440.00 $0
2 Costa
Mesa
PI $1,379,946.00 $1,103,956.80 $275,989.20 $275,989.20 $0 O&M $50,400.00 $40,320.00 $10,080.00 $10,080.00 $0
3 Newport
Beach
PI $517,842.00 $414,273.60 $103,568.40 $103,568.40 $0
O&M $22,400.00 $17,920.00 $4,480.00 $4,480.00 $0
Total $4,218,657.00 $3,374,925.60 $843,731.40 $803,731.40 $40,000.00 *
: Unused project funds from one Agency can be transferred to another Agency with mutual consent.
*
*: Total match amount may vary; the final match amount will be based on the actual project implementation costs, to be determined at completion of the Primary Implementation Phase of the project.
11 EXHIBIT B
BRISTOL STREET CORRIDOR RTSSP
PROJECT APPLICATION
12 10.5
45 Santa Ana
Costa Mesa
Newport Beach
Caltrans
Applicant Agency: City of
Contact Name:
Contact Number:
Contact Email:
Santa Ana
Cesar Rodriguez
714-647-5626
[email protected]
Cash Match:
In-kind Match:
Participating Agencies:
$803,731.40
$40,000.00
FY 2025 Call for Projects
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program
Project P
Supplemental Application
10/24/2024
Bristol Street
Application Deadline
Project Overview
Total Match:
$4,218,657.00
$3,374,925.60
$843,731.40
Length of Corridor (mi):
Number of signals:
Total Project Cost:
M2 funds requested:
13 Project P Supplemental Application Checklist Page
RTSSP Online Application – submitted through OCFundTracker a. Transportation Significance
b. Economic Effectiveness
c. Project Characteristics
d. Project Scale
e. Number of Jurisdictions
f. Current Project Status
g. Funding Match
h. Cabinet photos, equipment specifications, as-built drawings, cabinet drawings, etc. Online only Section 1: Key Technical Information
a. Name of Project Corridor/Grid/Route 1
b. Project Limits 1
c. Project Length 1
d. Number of Signalized Intersections Along Corridor 1 e. Participating Agencies/Traffic Forum Members 1
f. Lead Agency 1
g. Designation of the corridor to synchronize 1
h. Project Start and End Date 1
i. Previous funding 1
j. Contact Information 1
k. Signalized intersections that are part of the project 2 l. Offset signalized intersections that are part of the project 2 m. Project Map Depicting the Project Limits 3
Section 2: Regional Significance 4
Section 3: Acknowledgement of Required Tasks 5-8
Section 4: Funding Needs/Costs for Proposed Project by Task a. Summary of Project Cost 9
b. Summary of Cost by Agency 10
c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs 11-12
Section 5: Detailed Local Match Commitment 13
Section 6: Project Schedule by Task
a. Project Start and End Dates 14
b. Project Schedule by Task 14
Appendices
A. Calculations and Estimated Points
B. Agency Improvement Calculations
C. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
D. Agency Resolutions and Letters of Support
E. Additional Information (Fiber Optic Underground and TMC Improvement Details, Counts, Cabinet Pictures, and As-Built Plans)
Online
Project P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program Table of Contents
i
14 SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATION Bristol Street RTSSP a. Project
b.
from to
c. Project Length (miles ):
d. Number of signalized intersections along the corridor (include all Caltrans intersections):
number of signals on project co rridor(s) number of offset signals included in this project e. Participating agencies / Traffic Forum Members (including applicant agency ):
f. Lead Agency
h. Project End Date:
all applicant agencies and project signals are participating in the Countywide Baseline Project j. Contact Information (Include name, title, agency, phone, email, and address) Corridor
Bristol Street Corridor
10.46 Project Limits:
545
SR-22 EB Ramp Jamboree Road
Santa Ana
September 30, 2029April 1, 2026
Ramin Nikoui, Senior Engineer
City of Costa Mesa, 714-754-5184
[email protected]
77 Fair Drive,
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Project Start Date:
Re-timing at least 75% of previous project
Yes,
Cesar Rodriguez, Senior Civil Engineer
City of Santa Ana, 714-647-5626
[email protected]
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Kevin Riley, Principal Civil Engineer
City of Newport Beach, 949-644-3329
[email protected]
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Peter Ngo, Branch Chief, Traffic Signals/Ramp Metering/ Census
[email protected]
Caltrans District 12, 949-285-4262
6681 Marine Way
Irvine, CA 92618
Anaheim
Buena Park
Caltrans
Costa Mesa
Cypress
Dana Point
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Garden Grove
Huntington Beach
La Habra
La Palma
Laguna Beach
Laguna Hills
Mission Viejo
Orange
Placentia
Rancho Santa Margarita
San Clemente
Santa Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tustin
Villa Park
Westminster
County of Orange
Irvine
Lake Forest
San Juan Capistrano
Yorba Linda
Aliso Viejo
Brea
Laguna Niguel
Laguna Woods
Los Alamitos
Newport Beach
g. Is this project on either the Signal Synchronization Network or Master Plan of Arterial Highways? i. Project Status and Baseline Participation
No
Yes
1 15
SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATION Bristol Street Corridor k. Signalized intersections that are part of the project:
Main Corridor Cross Street
1 Bristol Street * SR-22 EB Ramps *
2 Bristol Street Riverglen Lane
3 Bristol Street Memory Lane
4 Bristol Street Santa Clara Avenue
5 Bristol Street Bristol Market Place/19th Street Legend 6 Bristol Street 17th Street Santa Ana
7 Bristol Street Washington Avenue Costa Mesa
8 Bristol Street Civic Center Drive Newport Beach
9 Bristol Street Santa Ana Boulevard * Caltrans
10 Bristol Street 1st Street
11 Bristol Street Bishop Street
12 Bristol Street McFaddden Avenue
13 Bristol Street Wilshire Avenue
14 Bristol Street Edinger Avenue
15 Bristol Street St. Andrew Place
16 Bristol Street Glenwood Place
17 Bristol Street Warner Avenue
18 Bristol Street Central Avenue
19 Bristol Street Hemlock Way
20 Bristol Street Segerstrom Avenue
21 Bristol Street Alton Avenue
22 Bristol Street Bristol Plaza
23 Bristol Street MacArthur Boulevard
24 Bristol Street Callens Common
25 Bristol Street Sunflower Avenue
26 Bristol Street Town Center Drive
27 Bristol Street Anton Boulevard
28 Bristol Street * I-405 NB Ramps *
29 Bristol Street * I-405 SB Ramps *
30 Bristol Street Hotel Way
31 Bristol Street Paularino avenue
32 Bristol Street Baker Street
33 Bristol Street Sobeca Way
34 Bristol Street Randolph Avenue
35 Bristol Street Bear Street
36 Bristol Street Newport Boulevard SB
37 Bristol Street Newport Boulevard NB
38 Bristol Street Santa Ana Avenue/ Redhill Avenue
39 Bristol Street NB Campus Drive / Irvine Avenue
40 Bristol Street SB Campus Drive/ Irvine Avenue
41 Bristol Street NB Birch Street
42 Bristol Street SB Birch Street
43 Bristol Street SB Bayview Place
44 Bristol Street NB Jamboree Road
45 Bristol Street SB Jamboree Road
l.
Main Street Cross Street
46 Paularino Avenue Jian Way
47 Anton Boulevard Park Center Drive
48 Anton Boulevard Avenue of the Arts
49 Anton Boulevard Sakioka Drive
50 Bayview Place Bayview Circle
Offset signalized intersections that are part of the project.
Baseline participants only need to list signals that are requesting improvements:
2 16
SECTION 2: REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE
Bristol Street RTSSP
Explain why this project is regionally significant:
The Bristol Street corridor is a reimagined project originally performed and funded by M2 RTSSP in FY 2014/2015. The Bristol Street corridor extends approximately 10.5 miles from State Route 22 Eastbound Ramp in the City of Santa Ana to Jamboree Road in the City of Newport Beach. The corridor encompasses 45 signalized intersections controlled by the Cities of Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, Newport Beach and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Caltrans is a participating agency in the project and the participating Cities are committed to executing a cooperative agreement with Caltrans for the implementation of optimized signal timing at the Caltrans intersections.
Bristol Street corridor is currently classified as a Major Arterial in the Cities of Santa Ana and Costa Mesa and as a Primary Arterial in the City of Newport Beach. The corridor is also designated as part of a Priority Corridor Network by the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan. The corridor carries traffic volumes as high as 53,000 in Santa Ana; to traffic volumes ranging from 40,000 to 20,0000 in City of Costa Mesa, down to approximately 16,000 vehicles daily in Newport Beach.
Bristol Street corridor is located in Central Orange County encompassing a wide range of land uses. At the northern limit in City of Santa Ana, the arterial primarily serves a mix of residential, retail, and schools including Mater Dei High School and Santa Ana College. Since 2015, Bristol Street in Santa Ana has experienced many physical roadway changes including street widening along several segments, new traffic signals, installation of bike lanes, and ongoing construction of the OC Streetcar along Santa Ana Blvd. This area experiences high morning and evening peak traffic volumes and requires a well balanced traffic signal system that serves both daily vehicle commuters and local pedestrian and bike users.
In City of Costa Mesa, the corridor primarily serves a mix of small and large retail shopping, restuarants, hotels, theatres and the popular South Coast Plaza Mall. This area of the Bristol Street corridor attracts visitors from all over Orange County and beyond and requires a traffic signal network that serves the local weekly commuters and the weekend guests that visit the area for shopping or entertainment.
At the southern limit in City of Newport Beach, the corridor serves a mix of retail, hotels, commercial businesses and the John Wayne Airport. The John Wayne airport serves over 11 million passengers annually and was ranked number 1 in the 2024 Airport Satisfaction Study. The airport is a critical HUB for transporation in Orange County and thus important that the traffic signal network is optimized to meet the demand. This area sees high morning, evening and seasonal peak traffic with high speeds and demands a well- synchronized network to meet the traffic demand.
The original signal timing and improvements on Bristol Street corridor has decayed and needs to be revisited.
Therefore, it is imperative that this very important corridor be considered for the 2025 Call for Projects from OCTA.
4 17
SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATION Bristol Street RTSSP m. Project Map Depicting the Project Limits and Offset Signals 3 18
SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS
Bristol Street RTSSP
a. PROJECT TASKS
Primary Implementation (PI) Phase, lasting approximately one year shall include the following:
Task 1:
Task 2:
Check this box to indicate all agencies on this application will opt out of the data collection portion of Task 3 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. A Before/After study is still required. A memorandum shall be submitted to indicate completion of this task.
By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, agree t
o the following tasks:
Project Management - PI Phase
Data Collection and Field Review
This task is ongoing throughout the duration of the PI Phase of the project. It includes day-to-day project management, such as meetings, progress reports, tracking of schedules, tracking of cost by agency, invoicing, and overall administration of the PROJECT.
The following list is a minimum of what is required of this task:
• A running record of project cost broken down by Participating Agency shall be part of this task.
T
his information will be used by the Lead Agency to bill Participating Agencies for their respective project match.
• A running record of all scope changes and/or any deviations from the final approved applic
ation. This information will be used by the Lead Agency to request for Scope Changes at the Semi-Annual Review (SAR).
This task shall include collecting seven-day, 24-hour machine counts, including vehicle and bike classifications, along each 1-mile segment of the corridor(s). The project shall also produce weekday and weekend peak period intersection turning movement (ITM) counts at every signalized intersection, including pedestrian and bicycle counts. ITM counts shall be conducted for two hours of each weekday peak period (AM, mid-day, and PM) and a single four-hour Saturday mid-day peak period. All counts shall be summarized in Microsoft Excel format. All data shall adhere to the CTFP Guidelines for data compatibility.
Data collection also includes field review of before and after conditions. The floating car method shall be utilized with software and GPS for the ’Before’ Study to fine-tune the corridor operation and verify integrity of system intersection clocks. Synchronized Video shall be used to compare actual conditions to anticipated conditions dictated by the time-space diagram so that any anomalies may be corrected prior to the ’After’ studies task.
Field review conducted as part of this task will document the existing conditions for all signal timing, infrastructure, and system improvements on the project. This includes pre-construction pictures for comparison during the post-construction walkthrough, should there be any questions or discrepancies noted by any parties. Data Collection and Field Review Memos shall be provided to all participating agencies.
5 19
SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS
Bristol Street RTSSP
Task 3:
Task 4:
Task 5:
Check this box to indicate all agencies on this application (excluding Caltrans) will opt out of the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation task (Task 4) due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. The Final PI Report shall still include a section on timing optimization and implementation from the Baseline Project.Task 4 for Caltrans signals is the responsibility of the applicant.
The Lead Agency will hire a consultant(s), licensed contractor(s), and/or use city staff, or extension of staff, to design, procure, install, construct, and implement all desired components of the project as described in this application in accordance with the CTFP Guidelines.
All work and equipment supplied for the project shall comply and be done in accordance with the latest standards and provisions of each Participating Agency or latest approved California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Standard Plans and Standard Specifications.
As-built plans shall be provided to match the improvements. This task is not complete until all participating agencies approve the improvements implemented in their jurisdiction.
A Final PI Report, with an executive summary, shall provide complete documentation of the project, including, but not limited to:
• Project scope, objectives, locations, findings, and recommendations • Data collected: counts, travel time studies, and project benefits achieved in terms of fuel savings, travel time, and other measurable parameters
• For each intersection: lane configurations, signal phasing, turning movement data, and cycle lengths for existing and proposed timings for all peak periods All agencies on this application will opt out of the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation portion of Task 4 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. However, Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation will be be conducted at the three (3) Caltrans intersections and coordinated with the Countywide Baseline Project. Cities of Santa Ana and Costa Mesa are committed to excecuting a Cooperative Agreeement with Caltrans for the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation efforts. Funding for Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 4.
Synchronization will be inter-jurisdictional in nature. All existing traffic patterns, flows, and conditions will be taken into account. At a minimum, synchronized timing plans will be developed for a weekday AM, Mid-day, PM, and a Weekend peak period. Special generators such as schools and businesses along with cross street traffic will be considered as part of the project. Timing plans that will be developed will assist traffic in getting to its destination without regard to physical or jurisdictional boundaries.
The following list is a minimum of what is required of this task:
• A review of the basic timing parameters
• Concept of Operations documenting the recommended coordination strategies (e.g. segments, cycle lengths, etc.) based on existing data collection and simulations • Existing and Optimized simulation networks in Synchro (version 10) that is also shared with OCTA using the OCTA designated ID numbers
• Implementation and fine-tuning of proposed timing plans This task will not be complete until all participating agencies approve the new timing plans implemented.
System Design and Construction
Final PI Report
Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
6 20
SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS
Bristol Street RTSSP
By checking this box, the following additional PI task(s) and/or exceptions will be made:
Task 6:
Task 7:
Task 8:
During this 24-month period, the signal timing along the corridor/route/grid shall be observed and fine- tuned. This task shall also include the monitoring, maintaining, and repair of detection and communication implemented as part of this project. Monthly drives shall be conducted along the length of the project during all designated corridor synchronization timing plan hours of operation in order to verify that the synchronization timing is working as designed and complete any necessary adjustments. This is followed by a monthly memorandum summarizing the status and trends of the corridor based on the runs conducted. Trip logs for the month shall be provided to the Participating Agencies. The memorandum shall include all additional tasks requested and completed during that month. Performance metrics comparisons from ATSPM, where available, shall also be included in the memorandum.
All agencies on this application will opt out of the Data Collection portion of Task 2 and Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation portion of Task 4 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. However, Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation will be conducted at the three (3) Caltrans intersections. These efforts will be closely coordinated with the Countywide Baseline Project. Cities of Santa Ana and Costa Mesa are committed to excecuting a Cooperative Agreeement with Caltrans for the Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization/ Implementation efforts. A Before/After study will be completed for the entire corridor including the Caltrans locations. No system construction is proposed at the Caltrans locations. Funding for Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization/ Implementation at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 2 and 4.
• All work performed for system construction and signal timing optimization • Implementation schedule and improvements accomplished, including dates • Procedures for continuing maintenance, surveillance, and evaluation of the coordinated signal system
The report shall document all planned and programmed improvements on the study corridor as well as recommendations based on PI tasks for further infrastructure improvements that would likely improve the corridor signal coordination project results. The report shall be completed in accordance with the current CTFP Guidelines.
Finally, the report shall provide recommendations with cost and benefit estimates for future improvements to traffic signal infrastructure (signal controllers, vehicle detection, communications, etc.), intersection capacity (appropriate signal phasing, lane geometrics, and alleviation of physical bottlenecks that curtail arterial capacity), and traffic management strategies. These proposed improvements should be useful in determining future enhancements to the corridor.
A Project Summary Sheet, one sheet front and back, that describes the project and improvements gained shall be provided to OCTA. This sheet will be used by OCTA and Participating Agencies to present to the Board and elected officials.
This task includes day-to-day project management, such as meetings, tracking of schedules, invoicing, and overall administration of the project. This task shall continue in full force as specified in the Primary Implementation Phase.
ONGOING OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) PHASE, lasting approximately two (2) years, shall include the following:
Final O&M Report
Continuing Support
Project Management - O&M Phase
7 21
SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS
Bristol Street RTSSP
By checking this box, the following additional O&M task(s) and/or exceptions will be made:
b.
c. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF MEETING CTFP GUIDELINES
At the end of the O&M Phase, a Final O&M Report documenting the Ongoing Operations and Maintenance efforts and procedures for continuing maintenance shall be prepared. At the minimum, the memorandum shall include when travel runs were conducted and issues and solutions throughout the phase. The memorandum shall document all planned and programmed improvements on the study corridor as well as recommendations for further infrastructure improvements that would likely improve the corridor signal coordination project results.
O&M Tasks 6-8 will be completed for the entire corridor including the Caltrans locations. Funding for O&M at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 6-8.
By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, certify that all
c
urrent CTFP guidelines were met for this project.
By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, agree to obtain environmental clearance and other permits (if needed) for this project
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND OTHER PERMITS
8 22
SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Bristol Street RTSSP
a. Summary of Project Cost
Match Commitment: 20% (minimum 20%)
Total Project Cost (PI and O&M for a total of 3 years):
Total M2 Request:
Total Agency Match:
Total Project Cost:
Total M2 Request for PI Phase:
Total Agency Match for PI Phase:
Total PI Cost:
Total M2 Request for O&M Phase:
Total Agency Match for O&M Phase:
Total O&M Cost:
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
PI Total
3,262,925.60$
815,731.40$
Project Total
843,731.40$
4,218,657.00$
4,078,657.00$
O&M Total
112,000.00$
Project Tasks Total Cost
4,218,657.00$
15,000.00$
105,000.00$
20,000.00$
50,000.00$
15,000.00$
3,845,257.00$
58,400.00$
110,000.00$
Total Project Cost:
Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
Task 7: Continuing Support
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
28,000.00$
140,000.00$
Task 5: Project Report
3,374,925.60$
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Task 3: System Design and Construction
9 23
SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Bristol Street RTSSP
b. Summary of Cost by Agency
Agency Caltrans Offset Total
23 1 24
2,200.00$ 52,800.00$
1,200.00$ 28,800.00$
- 2,070,269.00$
5,000.00$ 5,000.00$
1,000.00$ 24,000.00$
400.00$ 9,600.00$
2,100.00$ 50,400.00$
300.00$ 7,200.00$
PI
O&M
Agency Caltrans Offset Total
12 2 4 18
2,200.00$ 39,600.00$
1,200.00$ 21,600.00$
- 1,290,746.00$
5,000.00$ 10,000.00$
1,000.00$ 18,000.00$
400.00$ 7,200.00$
2,100.00$ 37,800.00$
300.00$ 5,400.00$
PI
O&M
Agency Caltrans Offset Total
71 8
2,200.00$ 17,600.00$
1,000.00$ 8,000.00$
- 484,242.00$
-$ -$
1,000.00$ 8,000.00$
400.00$ 3,200.00$
2,100.00$ 16,800.00$
300.00$ 2,400.00$
PI
O&M
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
Task 7: Continuing Support
Project Tasks (Costa Mesa)
Cost / Int Total Cost
Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
275,989.20$ 1,379,946.00$
M2 Requested Match Total Cost
517,842.00$
17,920.00$ 4,480.00$ 22,400.00$ MatchM2 Requested
67,200.00$
Newport Beach
Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
Number of Signals:
Project Tasks (Newport Beach)
Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 3: System Design and Construction
Task 7: Continuing Support
Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 3: System Design and Construction
Total Cost
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
Task 5: Project Report
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
40,320.00$
13,440.00$
436,173.80$
53,760.00$
1,744,695.20$
1,103,956.80$
2,180,869.00$
M2 Requested Match Total Cost
414,273.60$ 103,568.40$
Total Cost
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
Task 5: Project Report
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
Task 7: Continuing Support
Costa Mesa
Number of Signals:
Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Cost / Int
Santa Ana
Number of Signals:
Task 5: Project Report
Project Tasks (Santa Ana)
Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 3: System Design and Construction
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
10,080.00$ 50,400.00 $
Cost / Int Total Cost
10 24
SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Bristol Street RTSSP
11 25
SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Bristol Street RTSSP
c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs
Design Construction TOTAL
Average
Score
1 Santa Ana SR-22 EB Ramps * - $ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50.0 2 Santa Ana Riverglen Lane 12,200.00 $ 157,563.00 $ 169,763.00$ 27.5 3 Santa Ana Memory Lane 1,200.00 $ 15,498.00 $ 16,698.00$ 32.5 4 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue 1,200.00 $ 15,498.00 $ 16,698.00$ 32.5 5 Santa Ana Bristol Market Place/19th Street 7,300.00 $ 94,279.50 $ 101,579.50$ 36.3 6 Santa Ana 17th Street 2,300.00 $ 29,704.50 $ 32,004.50$ 38.3 7 Santa Ana Washington Avenue 1,200.00 $ 15,498.00 $ 16,698.00$ 32.5 8 Santa Ana Civic Center Drive 2,000.00 $ 25,830.00 $ 27,830.00$ 31.7 9 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard 1,300.00 $ 16,789.50 $ 18,089.50$ 22.5 10 Santa Ana 1st Street 1,600.00 $ 20,664.00 $ 22,264.00$ 32.5 11 Santa Ana Bishop Street 1,200.00 $ 15,498.00 $ 16,698.00$ 32.5 12 Santa Ana McFaddden Avenue 1,200.00 $ 15,498.00 $ 16,698.00$ 32.5 13 Santa Ana Wilshire Avenue 7,200.00 $ 92,988.00 $ 100,188.00$ 26.7 14 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue 7,100.00 $ 91,696.50 $ 98,796.50$ 32.5 15 Santa Ana St. Andrew Place 700.00 $ 9,040.50 $ 9,740.50$ 50.0 16 Santa Ana Glenwood Place 1,200.00 $ 15,498.00 $ 16,698.00$ 32.5 17 Santa Ana Warner Avenue - $ - $ -$ 18 Santa Ana Central Avenue 12,200.00$ 157,563.00$ 169,763.00$ 27.5 19 Santa Ana Hemlock Way 12,200.00$ 157,563.00$ 169,763.00$ 27.5 20 Santa Ana Segerstrom Avenue 1,100.00$ 14,206.50$ 15,306.50$ 50.0 21 Santa Ana Alton Avenue 1,200.00$ 15,498.00$ 16,698.00$ 32.5 22 Santa Ana Bristol Plaza 6,200.00$ 80,073.00$ 86,273.00$ 31.7 23 Santa Ana MacArthur Boulevard 1,100.00$ 14,206.50$ 15,306.50$ 50.0 24 Santa Ana Callens Common 6,200.00$ 80,073.00$ 86,273.00$ 31.7 25 Costa Mesa Sunflower Avenue 6,900.00$ 89,113.50$ 96,013.50$ 31.3 26 Costa Mesa Town Center Drive 6,900.00$ 89,113.50$ 96,013.50$ 31.3 27 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard 6,900.00$ 89,113.50$ 96,013.50$ 31.3 28 Costa Mesa I-405 NB Ramps * -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50.0 29 Costa Mesa I-405 SB Ramps * -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50.0 30 Costa Mesa Hotel Way 2,700.00$ 34,870.50$ 37,570.50$ 31.7 31 Costa Mesa Paularino avenue 6,900.00$ 89,113.50$ 96,013.50$ 31.3 32 Costa Mesa Baker Street 2,700.00$ 34,870.50$ 37,570.50$ 31.7 33 Costa Mesa Sobeca Way 1,600.00$ 20,664.00$ 22,264.00$ 22.5 34 Costa Mesa Randolph Avenue 6,900.00$ 89,113.50$ 96,013.50$ 31.3 35 Costa Mesa Bear Street 12,300.00$ 158,854.50$ 171,154.50$ 28.0 36 Costa Mesa Newport Boulevard SB 7,600.00$ 98,154.00$ 105,754.00$ 35.0 37 Costa Mesa Newport Boulevard NB 3,400.00$ 43,911.00$ 47,311.00$ 36.3 38 Costa Mesa Santa Ana Avenue/ Redhill Avenue 2,700.00 $ 34,870.50$ 37,570.50$ 31.7 39 Newport Beach Campus Drive / Irvine Avenue 2,100.00$ 27,121.50$ 29,221.50$ 31.7 40 Newport Beach Campus Drive/ Irvine Avenue 5,100.00$ 65,866.50$ 70,966.50$ 27.0 41 Newport Beach Birch Street 2,100.00$ 27,121.50$ 29,221.50$ 31.7 42 Newport Beach Birch Street 5,100.00$ 65,866.50$ 70,966.50$ 27.0 43 Newport Beach Bayview Place 5,100.00$ 65,866.50$ 70,966.50$ 27.0 44 Newport Beach Jamboree Road 5,100.00$ 65,866.50$ 70,966.50$ 27.0 45 Newport Beach Jamboree Road 5,100.00$ 65,866.50$ 70,966.50$ 27.0 46 Costa Mesa Paularino Avenue @ Jian Way 2,700.00$ 34,870.50$ 37,570.50$ 31.7 47 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Park Center
Drive 3,400.00$ 43,911.00$ 47,311.00$ 36.3 TASK 3 IMPROVEMENT TOTALS
LOC. AGENCY PROJECT CROSS STREETS
11 26
SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Bristol Street RTSSP
c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs
Design Construction TOTAL
Average
Score
TASK 3 IMPROVEMENT TOTALS
LOC. AGENCY PROJECT CROSS STREETS
48 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Avenue of the
Arts 3,400.00$ 43,911.00 $ 47,311.00$ 36.3 49 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Sakioka Drive 3,400.00 $ 43,911.00 $ 47,311.00$ 36.3 50 Newport Beach Bayview Place @ Bayview Circle 5,100.00$ 65,866.50 $ 70,966.50$ 27.0 - Santa Ana TMC Improvements 59,500.00 $ 768,442.50 $ 827,942.50$ 30.0 - Costa Mesa TMC Improvements - $ 166,980.00 $ 166,980.00$ 30.0 3,845,257.00$ 33.2SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT TOTAL =
12 27
SECTION 5: DETAILED LOCAL MATCH COMMITMENT
Bristol Street RTSSP
PI OMM PI OMM PI OMM
$396,173.80 $13,440.00 $40,000.00 $0.00 $436,173.80 $13,440.00 $275,989.20 $10,080.00 $0.00 $0.00 $275,989.20 $10,080.00 $103,568.40 $4,480.00 $0.00 $0.00 $103,568.40 $4,480.00 $775,731.40 $28,000.00 $40,000.00 $0.00 $815,731.40 $28,000.00 A. Cash Match
Agency Funding Source Amount of Cash
Contribution
Santa Ana M2 Fairshare $409,613.80
Costa Mesa Traffic Impact Fee $286,069.20
Newport Beach General Fund $108,048.40
$803,731.40
B. In-Kind Services
i. Specific Improvements (List items and Cost)
:
Agency Expenditure
Select a City
$0.00
ii. Staffing Commitment:
Agency Staff Position No. of Hours Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate Total*
Sr. Civil Engineer 100 $170.00 $17,000.00
Assistant Signal
Operations Engineer 100 $140.00 $14,000.00
Assistant Engineer 90 $100.00 $9,000.00
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
Equipment configuration, installation and
integration/ Construction Engineering
Santa Ana
Equipment configuration, installation and
integration/ Construction Engineering
PART 1: AGENCY TOTAL MATCH SUMMARY
PART 2: MATCH BREAKDOWN (CASH vs IN-KIND SERVICES)
Agency
Costa Mesa
$286,069.20 $0.00
CASH
Santa Ana
$409,613.80
TOTAL MATCH
$449,613.80
$286,069.20
$108,048.40 $0.00
IN‐KIND
$40,000.00
Newport Beach
$108,048.40
*Total amount is the required participation by the identified agency. The number of hours and hourly rate will be based on each agency’s actual fully burdened billing rates, which must collectively equal the same value of the assigned “Total” dollars. Each agency will be responsible for keeping detailed records of hours worked and description of work. An accounting record of personnel, hours at fully burdened rate shall be included with the in-kind report submittals. Records will be subject to auditing. In-kind match can be converted to Cash Match, but Cash Match cannot be converted to in-kind match.
Total for City of Santa Ana:
TOTAL IN-KIND MATCH* (i + ii):
Total Staffing Commitment (ii):
$843,731.40 $40,000.00
TOTAL CASH MATCH:
TOTAL MATCH
$803,731.40
Type of Service to Project
Project Oversight, Construction Engineering
Total Specific Improvements (i):
Description
13 28
SECTION 6: PROJECT SCHEDULE BY TASK
Bristol Street RTSSP
a. Projected Start and End Dates:
April 1, 2026
September 30, 2029
b. Projected Schedule by Task
Starting Date Ending Date
April 1, 2026 September 30, 2027
April 1, 2026 September 30, 2026
April 1, 2026 September 30, 2027
April 1, 2026 September 30, 2027
April 1, 2026 September 30, 2027
October 1, 2027 September 30, 2029
October 1, 2027 September 30, 2029
August 1, 2029 September 30, 2029
Project start date:
Project end date:
Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
Task
Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 3: System Design and Construction
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
Task 5: Project Report
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
Task 7: Continuing Support
14 29
Bristol Street RTSSP
CALCULATIONS AND ESTIMATED POINTS
Appendix A
30 Bristol Street RTSSP
Estimated
Points
Yes,
5 /7 4 =
=1 0
=1 5
/=
=
45 = 8
45 /4 5 =
=1 0
4 =5
/=
76 Criteria (Max Points)
# of offset signals on project / total # of offset signals : 100.0%
2. Economic Effectiveness (Cost to Benefit Ratio): (10 points)
3. Project Characteristics: (20 points)
373,623 11.29
25 11
5 1. Transportation Significance (25 points)
Inclusion of offset signals on MPAH w/in 2,700'
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): 373,623
10 7
18 Average project improvement score 33.2
all agencies are participating in the Countywide Baseline Project Re-timing at least 75% of previous project
APPENDIX A: CALCULATIONS AND ESTIMATED POINTS
Total Estimated Points:
Calculation for Total Project Cost / VMT =
Participating Jurisdiction(s)
# of signals along entire length of corridor(s) :
# of signals being synched / total # of corridor signals:
5. Number of Jurisdictions: (15 points)
6. Current Project Status (5 points)
4. Project Scale: (20 points)
$4,218,657
100.0%
$4,218,657.00
0 20.00%$843,731.40
7. Funding Match: (5 points)
31 Bristol Street RTSSP
Appendix B
AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS
32 APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS Bristol Street RTSSP Is this a timing-only project (no improvements)? Auto-Fill Input Only TABLE I: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT PREFERENCES
Santa Ana Costa Mesa Newport Beach Santa Ana Costa Mesa Newport Beach Santa Ana Costa Mesa Newport Beach 2 Fiber Optic underground $5,000 $8,000 $6,000 $500 $800 $600 Etherwan Switch w/ SFPs
12 SMFO Fiber Optic Drop
Cable In Existing Conduit,
Fiber Splicing (FDU and Splice
Enclosure), Etherwan Switch
w/ SFPs, No. 6E Pullbox, Hub
Switch with SFPs at Hub
Location
Cisco Switch w/
SFP's
4 ATC signal controller $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $700 $700 $700 Econolite Cobalt w/ EOS Software
Econolite Cobalt w/ EOS
Software
Econolite Cobalt w/
EOS Software
6 Signal cabinet on new foundation $60,000 $54,000 $6,000 $5,400 Econolite ATCC w/
Service and SCE Design
Fee
Econolite or Western Systems
(NEMA TS2-1 P Cabinet with
Service and SCE Design Fee)
8 BBS/UPS on existing foundation $15,000 $1,500 Marathon (in existing Cabinet)
10 CCTV $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $800 $800 $800 Axis or Cohu Axis or Cohu Axis 13 Vehicle detection + bicycle detection $50,000 $42,000 $5,000 $4,200 Econolite Vision or Iteris Apex
Econolite or Iteris Vantage
Vector
16 Pedestrian detection (audible) $11,000 $11,000 $1,100 $1,100 Polara (iN2S APS System) Polara (iN2S APS System)
21 EVP (infrared) $15,000 $1,500 GTT Opticom
27 Central System (server, licenses, workstations) $325,000 $110,000 $32,500 Relocate Servers to
New TMC, Install New
Fiber to New TMC,
Server Racks.
Centracs Licensing,
Dell Workstations,
Console/ Furniture
Work Stations, Centracs
Server, Centracs Licensing,
TMC Core Switch, Hub Switch
at Newport/Fair for Connection
back to TMC, Field Rugged
Laptop with Econolite Local
Edition Software, TMC
Furniture, and NTP Server
28 Display (video wall, VMS, etc.) $250,000 $18,000 $25,000 Video Wall Display,
Video Wall Software and
Server
Genetec VMS Licenses
29 UPS for TMC $20,000 $4,000 $2,000
APC Rack Mounted
UPS including External
Batteries
APC Rack Mounted UPS
Caltrans 34 Caltrans Cooperative Agreement $2,500 $2,500 $2,500
TMC/TOC
CATEGORIES
Comm
Field
Elements
UNIT PRICE (MATERIAL + LABOR) APPLICABLE DESIGN COST PER UNIT VENDOR/BRAND & ADDITIONAL NOTES
ITEM DESCRIPTIONID
Yes
No
18 33
APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS
Bristol Street Corridor
TABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTION
Fiber Optic underground
ATC signal controller
Signal cabinet on new
foundation
BBS/UPS on existing
foundation
CCTV
Vehicle detection + bicycle
detection
Pedestrian detection (audible)
EVP (infrared)
Central System (server,
licenses, workstations)
Display (video wall, VMS, etc.)
UPS for TMC
Caltrans Cooperative
Agreement
2468 1 0 1 3 1 6 2 1 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 4
1 Santa Ana SR-22 EB Ramps * 1
2 Santa Ana Riverglen Lane 111 1
3 Santa Ana Memory Lane 11
4 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue 11
5 Santa Ana Bristol Market Place/19th Street 11 11
6 Santa Ana 17th Street 11 1
7 Santa Ana Washington Avenue 11
8 Santa Ana Civic Center Drive 11 1
9 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard 11
10 Santa Ana 1st Street 11
11 Santa Ana Bishop Street 11
12 Santa Ana McFaddden Avenue 11
13 Santa Ana Wilshire Avenue 111
14 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue 11
15 Santa Ana St. Andrew Place 1
16 Santa Ana Glenwood Place 11
17 Santa Ana Warner Avenue
18 Santa Ana Central Avenue 111 1
19 Santa Ana Hemlock Way 111 1
20 Santa Ana Segerstrom Avenue 1
21 Santa Ana Alton Avenue 11
22 Santa Ana Bristol Plaza 11 1
23 Santa Ana MacArthur Boulevard 1
24 Santa Ana Callens Common 11 1
25 Costa Mesa Sunflower Avenue 1 111
26 Costa Mesa Town Center Drive 1 111
27 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard 1 111
28 Costa Mesa I-405 NB Ramps * 1
29 Costa Mesa I-405 SB Ramps * 1
30 Costa Mesa Hotel Way 11 1
31 Costa Mesa Paularino avenue 1 111
32 Costa Mesa Baker Street 11 1
33 Costa Mesa Sobeca Way 11
34 Costa Mesa Randolph Avenue 1 111
35 Costa Mesa Bear Street 1 1 111
36 Costa Mesa Newport Boulevard SB 11 111
37 Costa Mesa Newport Boulevard NB 11 1 1
38 Costa Mesa Santa Ana Avenue/ Redhill Avenue 11 1
39 Newport Beach Campus Drive / Irvine Avenue 11 1
LOCATION
IMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
19 34
APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS
Bristol Street Corridor
TABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTION
Fiber Optic underground
ATC signal controller
Signal cabinet on new
foundation
BBS/UPS on existing
foundation
CCTV
Vehicle detection + bicycle
detection
Pedestrian detection (audible)
EVP (infrared)
Central System (server,
licenses, workstations)
Display (video wall, VMS, etc.)
UPS for TMC
Caltrans Cooperative
Agreement
2468 1 0 1 3 1 6 2 1 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 4
LOCATION
IMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
40 Newport Beach Campus Drive/ Irvine Avenue 11 11 1
41 Newport Beach Birch Street 11 1
42 Newport Beach Birch Street 11 11 1
43 Newport Beach Bayview Place 11 11 1
44 Newport Beach Jamboree Road 11 11 1
45 Newport Beach Jamboree Road 11 11 1
46 Costa Mesa Paularino Avenue @ Jian Way 11 1
47 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Park Center Drive 11 1 1 48 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Avenue of the Arts 11 1 1 49 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Sakioka Drive 11 1 1
50 Newport Beach Bayview Place @ Bayview Circle 11 11 1 - Santa Ana TMC Improvements 111
- Costa Mesa TMC Improvements 111
4 2 3 0 66 2 6 1 3 2 1 62223QUANTITY TOTAL =
20 35
APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS
Bristol Street Corridor
TABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTION
1 Santa Ana SR-22 EB Ramps *
2 Santa Ana Riverglen Lane
3 Santa Ana Memory Lane
4 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue
5 Santa Ana Bristol Market Place/19th Street
6 Santa Ana 17th Street
7 Santa Ana Washington Avenue
8 Santa Ana Civic Center Drive
9 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard
10 Santa Ana 1st Street
11 Santa Ana Bishop Street
12 Santa Ana McFaddden Avenue
13 Santa Ana Wilshire Avenue
14 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue
15 Santa Ana St. Andrew Place
16 Santa Ana Glenwood Place
17 Santa Ana Warner Avenue
18 Santa Ana Central Avenue
19 Santa Ana Hemlock Way
20 Santa Ana Segerstrom Avenue
21 Santa Ana Alton Avenue
22 Santa Ana Bristol Plaza
23 Santa Ana MacArthur Boulevard
24 Santa Ana Callens Common
25 Costa Mesa Sunflower Avenue
26 Costa Mesa Town Center Drive
27 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard
28 Costa Mesa I-405 NB Ramps *
29 Costa Mesa I-405 SB Ramps *
30 Costa Mesa Hotel Way
31 Costa Mesa Paularino avenue
32 Costa Mesa Baker Street
33 Costa Mesa Sobeca Way
34 Costa Mesa Randolph Avenue
35 Costa Mesa Bear Street
36 Costa Mesa Newport Boulevard SB
37 Costa Mesa Newport Boulevard NB
38 Costa Mesa Santa Ana Avenue/ Redhill Avenue
39 Newport Beach Campus Drive / Irvine Avenue
LOCATION
IMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS
Construction
Management
& Inspection Contingency
15% 10%
-$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$
12,200.00$ 122,000.00 $ 20,130.00 $ 15,433.00 $ - $ 169,763.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 1,200.00$ 12,000.00$ 1,980.00$ 1,518.00$ -$ 16,698.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 1,200.00$ 12,000.00$ 1,980.00$ 1,518.00$ -$ 16,698.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 7,300.00$ 73,000.00$ 12,045.00$ 9,234.50$ -$ 101,579.50$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 2,300.00$ 23,000.00$ 3,795.00$ 2,909.50$ -$ 32,004.50$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 1,200.00$ 12,000.00$ 1,980.00$ 1,518.00$ -$ 16,698.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 2,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 3,300.00$ 2,530.00$ -$ 27,830.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 1,300.00$ 13,000.00$ 2,145.00$ 1,644.50$ -$ 18,089.50$ City will configure and Install Ethernet Switch. 1,600.00$ 16,000.00$ 2,640.00$ 2,024.00$ -$ 22,264.00$ City will configure and Install Ethernet Switch. 1,200.00$ 12,000.00$ 1,980.00$ 1,518.00$ -$ 16,698.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 1,200.00$ 12,000.00$ 1,980.00$ 1,518.00$ -$ 16,698.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 7,200.00$ 72,000.00$ 11,880.00$ 9,108.00$ -$ 100,188.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 7,100.00$ 71,000.00$ 11,715.00$ 8,981.50$ -$ 98,796.50$ 700.00$ 7,000.00$ 1,155.00$ 885.50$ -$ 9,740.50$ City will configure and Install Ethernet Switch. 1,200.00$ 12,000.00$ 1,980.00$ 1,518.00$ -$ 16,698.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
12,200.00$ 122,000.00 $ 20,130.00 $ 15,433.00 $ - $ 169,763.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 12,200.00$ 122,000.00 $ 20,130.00 $ 15,433.00 $ - $ 169,763.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 1,100.00$ 11,000.00$ 1,815.00$ 1,391.50$ -$ 15,306.50$ 1,200.00$ 12,000.00$ 1,980.00$ 1,518.00$ -$ 16,698.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 6,200.00$ 62,000.00$ 10,230.00$ 7,843.00$ -$ 86,273.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 1,100.00$ 11,000.00$ 1,815.00$ 1,391.50$ -$ 15,306.50$ 6,200.00$ 62,000.00$ 10,230.00$ 7,843.00$ -$ 86,273.00$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 6,900.00$ 69,000.00$ 11,385.00$ 8,728.50$ -$ 96,013.50$ 6,900.00$ 69,000.00$ 11,385.00$ 8,728.50$ -$ 96,013.50$ 6,900.00$ 69,000.00$ 11,385.00$ 8,728.50$ -$ 96,013.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$
-$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$
2,700.00$ 27,000.00$ 4,455.00$ 3,415.50$ -$ 37,570.50$ 6,900.00$ 69,000.00$ 11,385.00$ 8,728.50$ -$ 96,013.50$ 2,700.00$ 27,000.00$ 4,455.00$ 3,415.50$ -$ 37,570.50$ 1,600.00$ 16,000.00$ 2,640.00$ 2,024.00$ -$ 22,264.00$ 6,900.00$ 69,000.00$ 11,385.00$ 8,728.50$ -$ 96,013.50$ 12,300.00$ 123,000.00 $ 20,295.00 $ 15,559.50 $ - $ 171,154.50$ 7,600.00$ 76,000.00$ 12,540.00$ 9,614.00$ -$ 105,754.00$ Controller: includes convert timing to new format and integrate with Centracs.
3,400.00$ 34,000.00$ 5,610.00$ 4,301.00$ -$ 47,311.00$ Controller: includes convert timing to new format and integrate with Centracs.
2,700.00$ 27,000.00$ 4,455.00$ 3,415.50$ -$ 37,570.50$ 2,100.00$ 21,000.00$ 3,465.00$ 2,656.50$ -$ 29,221.50$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch.
NOTESDesign Construction TOTAL
SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS
Caltrans
Cooperative
Agreement
Fees ($2,500)
21 36
APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS
Bristol Street Corridor
TABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTION
LOCATION
IMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS
40 Newport Beach Campus Drive/ Irvine Avenue
41 Newport Beach Birch Street
42 Newport Beach Birch Street
43 Newport Beach Bayview Place
44 Newport Beach Jamboree Road
45 Newport Beach Jamboree Road
46 Costa Mesa Paularino Avenue @ Jian Way
47 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Park Center Drive
48 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Avenue of the Arts
49 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Sakioka Drive
50 Newport Beach Bayview Place @ Bayview Circle
- Santa Ana TMC Improvements
- Costa Mesa TMC Improvements
QUANTITY TOTAL =
Construction
Management
& Inspection Contingency
15% 10% NOTESDesign Construction TOTAL
SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS
Caltrans
Cooperative
Agreement
Fees ($2,500)
5,100.00$ 51,000.00 $ 8,415.00 $ 6,451.50 $ - $ 70,966.50$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 2,100.00$ 21,000.00 $ 3,465.00 $ 2,656.50 $ - $ 29,221.50$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 5,100.00$ 51,000.00 $ 8,415.00 $ 6,451.50 $ - $ 70,966.50$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 5,100.00$ 51,000.00 $ 8,415.00 $ 6,451.50 $ - $ 70,966.50$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 5,100.00$ 51,000.00 $ 8,415.00 $ 6,451.50 $ - $ 70,966.50$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 5,100.00$ 51,000.00 $ 8,415.00 $ 6,451.50 $ - $ 70,966.50$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 2,700.00$ 27,000.00 $ 4,455.00 $ 3,415.50 $ - $ 37,570.50$ 3,400.00$ 34,000.00 $ 5,610.00 $ 4,301.00 $ - $ 47,311.00$ Controller: includes convert timing to new format and integrate with Centracs.
3,400.00$ 34,000.00 $ 5,610.00 $ 4,301.00 $ - $ 47,311.00$ Controller: includes convert timing to new format and integrate with Centracs.
3,400.00$ 34,000.00 $ 5,610.00 $ 4,301.00 $ - $ 47,311.00$ Controller: includes convert timing to new format and integrate with Centracs.
5,100.00$ 51,000.00 $ 8,415.00 $ 6,451.50 $ - $ 70,966.50$ City will configure and Install Controller and Ethernet Switch. 59,500.00$ 595,000.00 $ 98,175.00 $ 75,267.50 $ - $ 827,942.50$ Refer to Appendix E for TMC Improvement Details -$ 132,000.00$ 19,800.00 $ 15,180.00 $ - $ 166,980.00$ Refer to Appendix E for TMC Improvement Details 3,845,257.00$ SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT TOTAL =
22 37
APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS Bristol Street Corridor TABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORES
Above ground (e.g. wireless,
cellular, etc.)
Fiber Optic underground
All other (e.g. copper, aerial
fiber, GPS, etc.)
ATC signal controller
Signal cabinet on existing
foundation
Signal cabinet on new
foundation
BBS/USP (attached)
BBS/UPS on existing
foundation
BBS/UPS on new foundation
CCTV
Vehicle detection + bicycle
detection
Pedestrian detection (audible)
EVP (infrared)
Central System (server,
licenses, workstations)
Display (video wall, VMS, etc.)
UPS for TMC
Timing Only
Timing + Traffic Responsive
(license only)
Timing + Peer-to-Peer
(configuration only)
Timing + Traffic Adaptive
(license only)
Caltrans Cooperative
Agreement
Y/N
1 Santa Ana SR-22 EB Ramps * 50 50.0
2 Santa Ana Riverglen Lane 15 50 15 30 27.5
3 Santa Ana Memory Lane 15 50 32.5
4 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue 15 50 32.5
5 Santa Ana Bristol Market Place/19th Street 15 50 30 50 36.3 6 Santa Ana 17th Street 15 50 50 38.3
7 Santa Ana Washington Avenue 15 50 32.5
8 Santa Ana Civic Center Drive 15 50 30 31.7
9 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard 15 30 22.5
10 Santa Ana 1st Street 15 50 32.5
11 Santa Ana Bishop Street 15 50 32.5
12 Santa Ana McFaddden Avenue 15 50 32.5
13 Santa Ana Wilshire Avenue 15 50 15 26.7
14 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue 15 50 32.5
15 Santa Ana St. Andrew Place 50 50.0
16 Santa Ana Glenwood Place 15 50 32.5
17 Santa Ana Warner Avenue
18 Santa Ana Central Avenue 15 50 15 30 27.5
19 Santa Ana Hemlock Way 15 50 15 30 27.5
20 Santa Ana Segerstrom Avenue 50 50.0
21 Santa Ana Alton Avenue 15 50 32.5
22 Santa Ana Bristol Plaza 15 50 30 31.7
23 Santa Ana MacArthur Boulevard 50 50.0
24 Santa Ana Callens Common 15 50 30 31.7
25 Costa Mesa Sunflower Avenue 15 30 30 50 31.3
26 Costa Mesa Town Center Drive 15 30 30 50 31.3
27 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard 15 30 30 50 31.3
28 Costa Mesa I-405 NB Ramps * 50 50.0
29 Costa Mesa I-405 SB Ramps * 50 50.0
30 Costa Mesa Hotel Way 15 30 50 31.7
31 Costa Mesa Paularino avenue 15 30 30 50 31.3
32 Costa Mesa Baker Street 15 30 50 31.7
33 Costa Mesa Sobeca Way 15 30 22.5
34 Costa Mesa Randolph Avenue 15 30 30 50 31.3
35 Costa Mesa Bear Street 15 15 30 30 50 28.0
36 Costa Mesa Newport Boulevard SB 15 50 30 30 50 35.0
37 Costa Mesa Newport Boulevard NB 15 50 30 50 36.3
38 Costa Mesa Santa Ana Avenue/ Redhill Avenue 15 30 50 31.7 39 Newport Beach Campus Drive / Irvine Avenue 15 50 30 31.7 40 Newport Beach Campus Drive/ Irvine Avenue 15 50 10 30 30 27.0
LOCATION
IMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT
SCORETime Source None/5+ Years or Within 5 Years 0/10+ or < 10 Online or Offline 23 38
APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS Bristol Street Corridor TABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORES
Above ground (e.g. wireless,
cellular, etc.)
Fiber Optic underground
All other (e.g. copper, aerial
fiber, GPS, etc.)
ATC signal controller
Signal cabinet on existing
foundation
Signal cabinet on new
foundation
BBS/USP (attached)
BBS/UPS on existing
foundation
BBS/UPS on new foundation
CCTV
Vehicle detection + bicycle
detection
Pedestrian detection (audible)
EVP (infrared)
Central System (server,
licenses, workstations)
Display (video wall, VMS, etc.)
UPS for TMC
Timing Only
Timing + Traffic Responsive
(license only)
Timing + Peer-to-Peer
(configuration only)
Timing + Traffic Adaptive
(license only)
Caltrans Cooperative
Agreement
Y/N
LOCATION
IMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT
SCORETime Source None/5+ Years or Within 5 Years 0/10+ or < 10 Online or Offline 41 Newport Beach Birch Street 15 50 30 31.7
42 Newport Beach Birch Street 15 50 10 30 30 27.0
43 Newport Beach Bayview Place 15 50 10 30 30 27.0
44 Newport Beach Jamboree Road 15 50 10 30 30 27.0
45 Newport Beach Jamboree Road 15 50 10 30 30 27.0
46 Costa Mesa Paularino Avenue @ Jian Way 15 30 50 31.7 47 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Park Center Drive 15 50 30 50 36.3 48 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Avenue of the Arts 15 50 30 50 36.3 49 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Sakioka Drive 15 50 30 50 36.3 50 Newport Beach Bayview Place @ Bayview Circle 15 50 10 30 30 27.0 - Santa Ana TMC Improvements 40 30 20 30.0
- Costa Mesa TMC Improvements 40 30 20 30.0
33.2AVERAGE SCORE =
24 39
APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS Bristol Street Corridor TABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORES
1 Santa Ana SR-22 EB Ramps *
2 Santa Ana Riverglen Lane
3 Santa Ana Memory Lane
4 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue
5 Santa Ana Bristol Market Place/19th Street
6 Santa Ana 17th Street
7 Santa Ana Washington Avenue
8 Santa Ana Civic Center Drive
9 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard
10 Santa Ana 1st Street
11 Santa Ana Bishop Street
12 Santa Ana McFaddden Avenue
13 Santa Ana Wilshire Avenue
14 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue
15 Santa Ana St. Andrew Place
16 Santa Ana Glenwood Place
17 Santa Ana Warner Avenue
18 Santa Ana Central Avenue
19 Santa Ana Hemlock Way
20 Santa Ana Segerstrom Avenue
21 Santa Ana Alton Avenue
22 Santa Ana Bristol Plaza
23 Santa Ana MacArthur Boulevard
24 Santa Ana Callens Common
25 Costa Mesa Sunflower Avenue
26 Costa Mesa Town Center Drive
27 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard
28 Costa Mesa I-405 NB Ramps *
29 Costa Mesa I-405 SB Ramps *
30 Costa Mesa Hotel Way
31 Costa Mesa Paularino avenue
32 Costa Mesa Baker Street
33 Costa Mesa Sobeca Way
34 Costa Mesa Randolph Avenue
35 Costa Mesa Bear Street
36 Costa Mesa Newport Boulevard SB
37 Costa Mesa Newport Boulevard NB
38 Costa Mesa Santa Ana Avenue/ Redhill Avenue
39 Newport Beach Campus Drive / Irvine Avenue
40 Newport Beach Campus Drive/ Irvine Avenue LOCATION
IMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS NOTES
25 40
APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS Bristol Street Corridor TABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORES
LOCATION
IMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS
41 Newport Beach Birch Street
42 Newport Beach Birch Street
43 Newport Beach Bayview Place
44 Newport Beach Jamboree Road
45 Newport Beach Jamboree Road
46 Costa Mesa Paularino Avenue @ Jian Way
47 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Park Center Drive
48 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Avenue of the Arts
49 Costa Mesa Anton Boulevard @ Sakioka Drive
50 Newport Beach Bayview Place @ Bayview Circle
- Santa Ana TMC Improvements
- Costa Mesa TMC Improvements
NOTES
26 41
Bristol Street RTSSP
Appendix C
VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT)
42 Bristol Street RTSSP
APPENDIX C: VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT)
ADTs Distance VMT
49,808 0.34 16,935
50,719 0.43 21,809
44,528 0.47 20,928
53,024 0.60 31,814
45,205 0.42 18,986
41,775 0.75 31,331
40,762 0.50 20,381
39,252 0.75 29,439
37,384 0.60 22,430
40,477 0.26 10,524
41,057 0.26 10,675
39,854 0.40 15,942
40,062 0.39 15,624
28,434 0.59 16,776
21,098 0.38 8,017
23,115 0.19 4,392
20,233 0.57 11,533
25,161 0.51 12,832
25,310 0.51 12,908
31,324 0.77 24,119
21,074 0.77 16,227
10.46 373,623
Segment
Memory Ln to Santa Clara Ave
Santa Clara Ave to 17th St
Civic Center Dr to 1st St
SR-22 Off Ramp/ Hesperian Wy to Memory Ln
MacArthur Blvd to Sunflower Ave
Sunflower Ave to I-405 NB Ramps
1st St to McFadden Ave
McFadden Ave to Edinger Ave
Edinger Ave to Warner Ave
Costa Mesa
17th St to Civic Center Dr
Warner Ave to Segerstrom Ave
Segerstrom Ave to Alton Ave
Santa Ana
Alton Ave to MacArthur Blvd
Baker St to Bear St
Bear St to Newport Blvd SB
Newport Blvd SB to Santa Ana Ave/ Redhill Ave
Santa Ana Ave/ Redhill Ave to Campus Dr/Irvine Ave
(Bristol St S)
Campus Dr/Irvine Ave to Jamboree Rd (Bristol St N)
Newport Beach
Campus Dr/Irvine Ave to Jamboree Rd (Bristol St S )
Santa Ana Ave/ Redhill Ave to Campus Dr/Irvine Ave
(Bristol St N)
I-405 NB Ramps to Baker St
Source: 2024- Costa Mesa, Newport Beach; 2023- Newport Beach; 2022 - Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, and Newport Beach Total Project VMT:
43 Bristol Street RTSSP
AGENCY RESOLUTIONS AND LETTERS OF SUPPORT
Appendix D
44 Resolution No. 2024-XXX
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA APPROVING TH E SUBMITTAL OF
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TO THE ORANGE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR FUNDING UNDER
THE REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION
PROGRAM
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUN CIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:
A. The Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program targets over 2,000 signalized intersections across Orange County to maintain traffic signal synchronization, improve traffic flow, and reduce congestion across jurisdictions.
B. The City of Santa Ana has been declared by the Orange County Transportation Authority to meet the eligibility requirements to receive revenues as part of Measure M2.
C. The City of Santa Ana must include all projects funded by Net Revenues in the seven-year Capital Improvement Program as part of the Renewed Measure M Ordinance eligibility requirement.
D. The City of Santa Ana authorizes a formal amendment to the seven-year Capital Improvement Program to add projects app roved for funding upon approval from the Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors, if necessary.
E. The City of Santa Ana has currently adopted a Local Signal Synchronization Plan consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan as a key component of local agencies’ efforts to synchronizing traffic signals across local agencies’ boundaries.
F. The City of Santa Ana will provide matching funds for each project as required by the Comprehensive Tr ansportation Fu nding Programs Procedures Manual.
G. The City of Santa Ana will not use Renewed Measure M funds to supplant Developer Fees or other commitments.
45 Resolution No. 2024-XXX
G. The City of Santa Ana desires to implement mult i-jurisdictional signal synchronization listed below.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Sa nta Ana hereby approves the formal submissions of the projects described below to the Orange County Transportation Authority for funding under the OCTA’s Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program and requests that the OCTA a llocate funds in the amount s specified in the City’s submissions. Said funds shall be matched by funds from Santa Ana as required and shall be used as supplemental funding to aid the City in signal synchronization along the following street(s):
PROJECT PROGRAM
FY
Section 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana appoints the City Manager, or his or her designee, as agent for the City of Santa Ana to conduct all negotiations, and execute and submit all documents, including but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for allocation of the requested funds to Santa Ana.
Section 4. This Resolution shall take effe ct immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution.
ADOPTED this ____ day of ___________________, 2024.
V a l e r i e A m e z c u a
M a y o r
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
B y :
Jonathan T. Martinez
Assistant City Attorney
Bristol Street Traffic Signal Synchronization
RTSSP 25/26
46 Resolution No. 2024-XXX
AYES: Councilmembers
N O E S : C o u n c i l m e m b e r s
A B S T A I N : C o u n c i l m e m b e r s
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers _
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby certify the attached Resolution No. 2024- ____ to be the original resolution adopted by the Ci ty Council of the City of Santa Ana on _____________________, 2024.
Date:
City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
47 48
ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-xx
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBMITTA L OF A FUNDING APPLICATION TO
THE ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR FUNDING UNDER THE COMPETITIVE MEASURE M2 RE GIONAL TRAFFIC SYNCHRONIZATION
PROGRAM (RTSSP)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CO STA MESA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY FIND AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:
a) WHEREAS, the Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program targets over 2,000 signalized intersections across Orange County to maintain traffic signal synchronization, improve traffic flow, and reduce congestion across jurisdictions; and b) WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa has been declared by the Orange County Transportation Authority to meet the eligibility requirements to receive revenues as part of Measure M2; and
c) WHEREAS, the CITY must include all projects funded by Net Revenues in the seven- year Capital Improvement Program as part of the Renewed Measure M Ordinance eligibility requirement; and
d) WHEREAS, the CITY authorizes a formal amendment to the seven-year Capital Improvement Program to add projects approved for fundi ng upon approval from the Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors, if necessary; and e) WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa has currently adopted a Local Signal Synchronization Plan consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan as a key component of local agencies’ efforts to synchronizing traffic signals across local agencies’ boundaries; and
f) WHEREAS, the City of Co sta Mesa will provide matching funds for each project as required by the Comprehensive Transporta tion Funding Programs Procedures Manual; and
g) WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa will not use Renewed Measure M funds to supplant Developer Fees or other commitments; and
h) WHEREAS, the City of Cost a Mesa desires to implement multi-jurisdictional signal synchronization listed below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
The City Council of the City of Costa Me sa hereby requests the Orange County Transportation Authority allocate funds in t he amounts specified in the City’s application to said City from the Regional Traffic Si gnal Synchronization Program. Said funds, if approved, shall be
matched by funds from said City as required and shall be used as 49 ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 2 of 3
supplemental funding to aid the City in signal synchronization along the following street(s):
PROJECT PROGRAM FY
Bristol Street Traffic Signal Synchronization RTSSP 25/26 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2024.
_______________________________
John Stephens, Mayor
50 ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 3 of 3
ATTEST: APP ROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________ _______________ ________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2024-xx and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 19
th day of November, 2024, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 19
th day of November 2024.
_______________________________
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK (SEAL)
51 52
RESOLUTION NO. 2024 - ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA SUPPORTING AN
APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FOR THE
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPO RTATION AUTHORITY’S
MEASURE M2 TRAFFIC SI GNAL SYNCHRONIZATION
PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE BRISTOL STREET
PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Orange County Transportation Authority’s (“OCTA”) Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (“Program”) targets over two thousand (2000) signalized intersections across Orange County to maintain traffic signal synchronization, improve traffic flow, and reduce congestion across jurisdictions;
WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach (“City ”) has been declared by OCTA to meet the eligibility requirements to receive revenues as part of the Program;
WHEREAS, City must include all projects funded by the net revenues in the City’s seven-year Capital Improvement Program as part of OCTA’s Renewed Measure M Local Transportation Authority Ordinance eligibility requirements;
WHEREAS, City has a currently adopted a Local Signal Synchronization Plan consistent with the countywide Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan as a key component of the City’s efforts to synchronize traffic signals across its boundaries;
WHEREAS, City desires to support the funding application of the City of Santa Ana to implement a multi-jurisdictional traffic signal synchronization project for the Bristol Street.
WHEREAS, by this resolution, the City Counc il for the City intends to authorize a formal amendment to its seven-year Capital Improvement Program to add the Project for funding upon approval from OCTA’s Board of Directors to fund the Project as part of the Program;
WHEREAS, by this resolution, the City Council for the City intends to agree to provide matching funds for the primary implementation and ongoing maintenance and monitoring of Project, as required by the Guidelines M anual for OCTA’s Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs; and
WHEREAS, City will not use renewed Program f unds to supplant developer fees or other commitments.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as follows:
Section 1: The City Council does hereby support the funding applic ation of the City of Santa Ana to implement the Project.
53 Resolution No. 2024-___
Section 2: The City Council does her eby authorize a formal amendment to its seven-year Capital Improvement Program to add the Project for funding upon approval from OCTA’s Board of Directors to fund the Project as part of the Program.
Section 3: The City Council does hereby agree to provide matching funds for the primary implementation and on going maintenance and monitoring of the Project, as required by the Guidelines Manual for OC TA’s Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs.
Section 4: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are incorporated into the operative part of this resolution.
Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 6: The City Council finds the adoption of this resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
Section 7: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution.
ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2024.
______________________
Will O’Neill
M a y o r
ATTEST:
__________________________
Leilani I. Brown
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
___________________________
Aaron C. Harp
City Attorney
54 “Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” DISTRICT 12
1750 East 4 th Street, Suite 100 | SANTA ANA, CA 92705 (657) 328-6000 | FAX (657) 328-6522 TTY 711
https://dot.ca.gov/caltrans-near-me/district-12
October 7, 2024
Zdenek Kekula
Principal Civil Engineer
City of Santa Ana
PWA – Traffic Engineering
20 Civic Center Plaza, M-43
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Subject: Letter of Support for Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program Application – Bristol Street Corridor
Dear Mr. Kekula:
The Orange County Transportation Authority recently issued the 2024 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program Call for Projects for the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program to coordinate traffic signals across jurisdictional boundaries in the County.
The State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is in support of the City of Santa Ana’s submittal of the Call for the Projects application for signal synchronization on the Bristol Street corridor from SR-22 Ramps in the City of Santa Ana to Jamboree Road in the City of Newport Beach.
Caltrans Signal on Bristol St. Corridor:
1. SR-22 EB Ramps
2. I-405 NB Ramps
3. I-405 SB Ramps
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Mansour Feiz at (949) 279-9169 or by email at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Peter Ngo, P.E.
Branch Chief, Traffic Signals/Ramp Metering/Census
Caltrans District 12
6681 Marine Way
Irvine, CA 92618
Mobile: (949) 285-4262
55 Bristol Street RTSSP
Appendix E
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(Fiber Optic Underground and TMC Improvement Details, Cabinet Pictures, and As- Built Plans)
56 Bristol RTSSP
Additional Improvement Details
Agency: City of Santa Ana
Fiber Optic Underground
System Improvement Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount Total Etherwan Fiber Optic Ethernet Switch (w/
SFP's and Power Supply) EA 18 $5,000 $90,000
Total $90,000
Intersections 18
Total Per Intersection $5,000
USE $5,000
Central System (server, licenses, workstations)
System Improvement Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount Total Dell Workstation with Dual Monitors EA 3 $15,000 $45,000 Central System Licenses LS 1 $90,000 $90,000
Relocate Servers to New TMC LS 1 $15,000 $15,000
Remove and Discard old TMC Equipment LS 1 $10,000 $10,000 Server Racks (bolt down) LS 1 $15,000 $15,000
Install New Fiber to New TMC (including
Splicing, FDU, and Terminations) LS 1 $50,000 $50,000
Console/ Furniture LS 1 $100,000 $100,000
Total $325,000
USE $325,000
Display (Video Wall, VMS, etc..)
System Improvement Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount Total Video Wall LS 1 $175,000 $175,000
Video Wall Software EA 1 $50,000 $50,000
Video Wall Server EA 1 $25,000 $25,000
$0 $0
Total $250,000
USE $250,000
$90,000
$325,000
$250,000
57 Bristol RTSSP
Additional Improvement Details
Agency: City of Costa Mesa
Fiber Optic Underground
System Improvement Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount Total Etherwan Switch with SFP Modules EA 16 $5,000 $80,000
New Hub Switch with SFP Modules at Hub
Location (Bristol/Sunflower Hub) EA 1 $15,000 $15,000
Furnish and Install 12 SMFO Drop Cable * EA 3 $1,000 $3,000 Furnish and Install New #6E Pull Box * EA 3 $3,000 $9,000 Furnish and Install New Fiber Patch Panel with
Fiber Optic Pigtails/cabling * EA 3 $1,500 $4,500
Furnish and Install Splice Enclosure * EA 3 $2,500 $7,500 Fusion Splice Strands of SMFO Cable & Testing * EA 3 $2,500 $7,500 Total $126,500
Intersections 16
Total Per Intersection $7,906
USE $8,000
Central System (server, licenses, workstations)
System Improvement Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount Total New Workstations for TMC EA 2 $10,000 $20,000
New Centracs Server and Maintenance
Agreement Renewal LS 1 $47,000 $47,000
Core TMC Switch EA 1 $15,000 $15,000
Hub Switch for Newport/Fair for Connection
back to TMC EA 1 $15,000 $15,000
Field Rugged Laptop with Econolite Local
Edition Software LS 1 $5,000 $5,000
TMC Furniture LS 1 $4,000 $4,000
NTP Server LS 1 $4,000 $4,000
Total $110,000
USE $110,000
$126,500
$110,000
* Anton/Park Center Dr, Anton/Ave of the Arts, and Anton/Sakioka 58 Bristol RTSSP
Additional Improvement Details
Agency: Newport Beach
Fiber Optic Underground
System Improvement Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount Total Cisco Fiber Optic Ethernet Switch (w/ SFP's
and Power Supply) EA 7 $6,000 $42,000
Total $42,000
Intersections 7
Total Per Intersection $6,000
USE $6,000
$42,000
59