Public Comments — Costa Mesa City Council, June 16, 2026

From: Priscilla Rocco
To: FVPMP; CITY CLERK
Subject: Kelly Dalton, Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration; cc. Costa Mesa City Council Date: Friday, June 12, 2026 6:57:38 PM
Dear Mr. Dalton,
I think that we must save Fairview Park as a Nature preserve and Native American sacred site. If not for the love of an irreplaceable refuge of flora, fauna, and the largest vernal pool complex west of the Mississippi, then for Ecotourism that will bring a wider range of tourists to the City of Costa Mesa.

Costa Mesa First has drafted an extremely detailed letter with suggestions and questions about the IS/MND. I doubt you will get a better analysis anywhere. I, therefore, support this information and ask that you give it great consideration as you move forward.

In closing, I find it impossible to comprehend why the City can find no money for a park ranger to stop the destruction of gangs on e-bikes and motorcycles in Fairview Park, yet is happily subsidising the Harbor Soaring Society's destruction of another nesting area in the park for a new runway.

Every scientist and agency has made it clear that their activities are anathema to a passive Nature park. It defies logic that the decisions about Fairview Park are being made by ignorant politicians who think a golf course is Nature.

Priscilla Rocco
Costa Mesa
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: Stephanie Cornwall
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Costa Mesa flock cameras
Date: Monday, June 15, 2026 10:11:01 PM
To Whom it May Concern,
As a Costa Mesa resident I am deeply concerned about the mass surveillance of myself and my neighbors through the use of flock cameras. Flock has had a history of sharing data more broadly with other entities that they did not initially intend to share with, including with government entities.

The right to privacy is incredibly important and should not be given up. Using this mass AI surveillance system would be a huge mistake.

Stephanie Cornwall
Sent from my iPhone
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: Karen K
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Flock cameras
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 9:33:06 AM
The relentless expansion of surveillance cameras must cease immediately. We are ordinary, law-abiding citizens, not criminals, yet we are subjected to constant monitoring under the guise of crime prevention. This technology tags, watches, and tracks our every move, fundamentally violating the privacy that good citizens are entitled to. The idea that ubiquitous cameras are a legitimate tool against crime when they infringe on everyone's daily life is a false premise. We demand an immediate halt to this invasive practice that erodes our fundamental rights. STOP it now.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: Priscilla Rocco
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Get The FLOCK out of Costa Mesa
Date: Monday, June 15, 2026 11:22:22 PM
City Council,
SB34 and other laws prohibit California local and state law enforcement agencies from sharing automatic license plate reader (ALPR) data or connecting their databases with federal entities like ICE, CBP, or out-of- state public agencies. Yet in areas like Costa Mesa, Orange County, and San Diego, civil rights investigations and audits found instances of local police departments violating SB 34 and other laws by sharing data with agencies like ICE and DHS over and over again.

You might say this is a great way to catch people who are speeding, or running a red light. But that's not how it works. The system is always on, indiscriminately collecting all license plate numbers of every car that passes by. And these databases have been routinely abused and misused.

In the last year and a half, we've seen that laws and policies do not protect our communities from brutality and even death at the hands of government goons. Especially if the city council is taken-over by forces who feel it's their duty to work arm-in-arm with ICE, US Customs and Boarder Protection, and Homeland Security to round up our law-abiding neighbors (fathers, mothers, and nursing babies) and dump them in over-crowded and unsanitary for- profit concentration camps, or deport them to torture prisons outside the country, or to other countries engulfed in war.

This isn't hyperbole. It's what's happening to our teachers, store clerks, and nurses everyday in every state throughout our country.

This FLOCK system tracks our daily movements and stores them in a database, to be searched on demand without reasonable suspicion or warrants. This is a massive invasion of privacy and a waste of taxpayer funds. These cameras arguably violate our 4th Amendment rights against unwarranted searches and seizures, especially since the data in these databases can so easily be used for nefarious purposes.

These cameras must be removed. This is not a system for catching reckless drivers. It is a system of Big Brother surveillance.

From: Amanda Shepherd Yoga
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: No Flock Cameras
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 7:19:32 AM
Dear Costa Mesa City Clerk:

Please block Flock cameras. Surveillance does not equal safety. Flock databases are far too easily abused by warrantless searches from ICE and DHS with “side door “ work arounds to circumvent SB34 and SB54.

Protecting privacy is a higher priority than traffic tickets.

Flock cameras are unnecessary and violate personal privacy. Orange County does not need them.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

/s/
Amanda Shepherd :)
20982 Seacoast Circle
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
e: [email protected]

From: Erin Hendershot
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: No to flock
Date: Monday, June 15, 2026 7:22:40 PM
Sent from my iPhone
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: Rebecca Wyant
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Please Read into the Meeting Record
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 7:34:26 AM
Residents AND the students of Costa Mesa do NOT want this dystopian surveillance system.

They have already been misused in the field and are not here for our protection.

GET THE FLOCK CAMERAS OUT OF COSTA MESA! AND: Do NOT replace Flock with another surveillance vendor!
-

IMPORTANT
This email is from a student and does NOT represent the official views of the Coast Community College District, Orange Coast College, Golden West College, or Coastline College.

This email may be a SCAM if it:

Claims to be from IT and mentions your account
Offers a job of any kind
Pretends to represent any of the campuses
If you notice any of these signs, or if the email seems unusual or inappropriate, please report it to [email protected].

From: Jay C
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Please read into the meeting record
Date: Monday, June 15, 2026 11:38:59 PM
Please, get all Flock cameras out of Costa Mesa. They are not what our democracy is. They are mass surveillance that not only undermine our privacy, but also threaten democracy, and have been used to surveil individuals illegally. They create an atmosphere of fear to speak out on our street corners or travel freely in our cities. This is not to mention that the owners of Flock are beholding to and give their allegiance to a corrupt administration in Washington, that will not hesitate to use the Flock data if/when they choose to declare war on any people peacefully demonstrating against Trump remaining in office.

I am a long time resident here in Orange County, and do not consider myself radical to the right or left, but to be fiscally conservative, and a supporter of our constitution.

From: Samuel Castaneda
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Please read into the meeting record
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 11:44:51 AM
To the people of Costa Mesa,
As a regular visitor of Costa Mesa's restaurants and shops it concerns me that the city would cooperate with flock! Automatic license plate readers have lost my trust as toll roads also has automated readers that has repeatedly sent me fines for a plate that "looked like mine". I wouldn't want countless other citizens harassed due to readers that send information that is automated and collected without consent. Please keep these alpr and flock out of your city! Thank You,
Sam Castaneda
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: Raquel Z
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Please read into the meeting record
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 11:46:04 AM
Dear Council Members,
My name is Raquel and I work in the field of Public Health, I’ve lived in Orange County for 20 years and I am a community member of Costa Mesa.

The presence of Flock or any other ALPR cameras in Costa Mesa is a major security risk, a violation of privacy and civil liberties, and have a high risk of misuse. I am asking Costa Mesa to join other cities that have successfully removed their ALPR cameras and ended their contracts with Flock across the country.

Costa Mesa’s website states that “the ALPR systems utiliz[ed] only detect license plates and vehicles [and that] they do not photograph or record the occupants of vehicles and do not utilize facial recognition technology.” The cameras operated may only capture rear plates. But the Flock platform those cameras feed into is significantly more than a plate reader. Flock can release constant updates that expands the capabilities without installation. As a community member we don’t have a voice currently as there are no procedures to have a city council hearing or a vote for these updates.

The 4th amendment says we have “The right of the people to be secure in their persons , houses, papers , and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” In Carpenter v. United States (2018)
, the Supreme Court explicitly rejected the argument that venturing into public eliminates Fourth Amendment protection. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the government's access to 127 days of cell-site location data, tracking movements on public roads, achieved near perfect surveillance, as if it had attached an ankle monitor to the phone's user.[1] The Court said, “A person does not surrender all Fourth Amendment protection by venturing into the public sphere.” This case is one example of how as a community members these cameras are a violation of our personal liberties and right to privacy.

Beyond this Flock cameras are notoriously insecure. At one point they forgot to set the password for 60+ cameras meaning anyone could download 30 days worth of video archive and change settings. I do not feel comfortable with individuals using these cameras to track our community members. Every database search is supposed to be logged with a justification, but officers usually just cite a vague statute.

There are many documented instanced of officers using the database for personal reasons. In 2024, the former police chief of Sedgwick, Kansas, used Flock automatic license-plate reader (ALPR) cameras to track his ex-girlfriend's vehicles 228 times over more than four months and even followed her and her new boyfriend.

We have already seen this happen in many instances including in Costa Mesa itself, with a Costa Mesa police officer pleading guilty to using law enforcement tools, including FLOCK license plate readers, to track his wife, mistress and romantic rivals!! Additionally the use of these cameras allows ICE to access Flock data. There have been many cases where federal and state agencies accessed Flock camera data without consent one of which being Mountain View, California.

City Council members I request that you Remove Flock cameras from Costa Mesa and do NOT replace Flock with another surveillance vendor.

From: Kathryn Hoist
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Please read into the meeting record
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 11:47:50 AM
Hello,
I am writing in regards to removing flock cameras from Costa Mesa. As a member of the community who is greatly disturbed at the amount of dangerous driving and would love more accountability in keeping our streets safe, I do not trust this private company due to its many failings across this country including illegally detaining citizens based on flock footage that used ai to ID people incorrectly and the company’s track record for lying about how data is stored.

In our own city, an officer on leave used flock camera footage to stalk his own wife and mistress. We cannot trust the words that any representative from Flock says because their own CEO has lied about security measures within their technology.

It disturbs me that we are willing to allow a private company to build entire databases of Costa Mesa citizens and the people who visit us here to use however they want. It cannot possibly have a benefit that out ways this cost both socially and fiscally.

There are no protections against someone hacking into this system and there are already people doing it. Let’s find a better way to handle keeping Costa Mesa safe instead of this dystopian spy program.

Thank you for reading my comment,
Kathryn Hoist
District 6
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: Sean Drexler
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Please read into the meeting record
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 11:48:48 AM
Hello Mayor and City Council,
I am writing to urge the council to cancel the city's contract(s) with Flock and to remove all Flock ALPR cameras from Costa Mesa. Further, I urge the council to refrain from replacing Flock with another surveillance vendor. These cameras invade our privacy and put Costa Mesa residents, workers, and commuters at risk of harm - the opposite of their stated purpose.

Thank you,
Sean Drexler
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: Mary Ang
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Please read into the meeting record
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 11:48:49 AM
Dear Costa Mesa Council,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the deployment of Flock Safety license plate reader (LPR) cameras in our community. While I understand the intent to improve public safety, I believe these systems pose significant and unacceptable risks to the privacy and civil liberties of residents.

My primary concerns are as follows:

1. Mass Surveillance Without Consent. Flock cameras capture and log the movements of every vehicle that passes through — including those of law-abiding residents who have not consented to being tracked. This creates a de facto surveillance network that records our daily routines, whereabouts, and associations.

2. Data Retention and Third-Party Access. Flock Safety retains vehicle data and shares it with a broad network of law enforcement agencies, including those outside our jurisdiction.

Residents have no visibility into who accesses this data, for what purpose, or for how long it is stored.

3. Lack of Oversight and Accountability. There is currently no clear local policy governing data access requests, audit trails, or independent oversight. Without these safeguards, the potential for misuse — including tracking of political activity, religious attendance, or domestic situations — is real and documented in other jurisdictions.

4. Chilling Effect on Free Movement. The knowledge that one's movements are being logged has a documented chilling effect on constitutionally protected activities, including free assembly and association.

I urge the CM Council to pause any expansion or new deployment of Flock cameras until a comprehensive public process is conducted — including community input, an independent privacy impact assessment, a strict data retention and access policy, and regular public audits.

Our community deserves both safety and privacy. These goals are not mutually exclusive, and I ask that you pursue solutions that protect both.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I welcome the opportunity to discuss this further.

Sincerely,
Mary
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: Madelyn Sando
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Please read into the meeting record
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 9:37:00 AM
As a lifelong resident of Orange County, and frequent visitor if the great city of Costa Meas, I urge the Costa Mesa City Council to ask that Costa Mesa CANCEL its contract with Flock and remove all Flock ALPR cameras. Furthermore, do NOT replace Flock with another vendor.

Despite claims that these cameras are only used to look at vehicles connected to crimes, they are fundamentally blanket surveillance and tracking systems. The system captures every plate it sees and retains them all for 365 days, according to CM Transparency Portal. Every car, every driver, whether connected to a crime or not. That is not targeted law enforcement.

I'm sure the intentions of the Costa Mesa City Council and the CMPD are good, but intentions mean nothing, especially when the actions of Flock go against those intentions. Flock itself describes its system as functioning to classify people by gender, race, height, weight, and clothing. Not cars, people. Flock has a unified operating system that ties plate readers, video, audio, and AI into a single, searchable platform. We already have evidence of other cities, like Mountain View, enacting their own safeguards, only to later discover that Flock overrode those measures without their knowledge.

Any vendor of any kind behaving in this way should automatically be disqualified from operating in Costa Mesa.

Thank you for your time and your attention.

From: Bulmaro Vicente
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Public Comment
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 11:50:12 AM
Hello Mayor and Members of the City Council,
My name is Bulmaro "Boomer" Vicente, and I am the Political and Policy Director for Chispa.

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the City's use of Flock Safety cameras and to urge the Council to cancel its contract with Flock.

Surveillance technology raises serious concerns about privacy, civil liberties, and the potential for misuse. These concerns are especially urgent given the current climate surrounding immigration enforcement. Costa Mesa has been deeply impacted by recent immigration raids, and many immigrant families are living in fear. The last thing our community needs is an expanded surveillance network capable of tracking residents' movements and storing their data.

We have already seen how surveillance technology can be abused. A former law enforcement officer reportedly misused camera data to stalk an ex-partner, demonstrating that even when safeguards exist, access to sensitive information can be exploited. This incident should serve as a warning that these systems are not immune from misuse.

Beyond the privacy concerns, Flock cameras collect and retain vast amounts of data on everyday residents who have done nothing wrong. This creates significant risks for immigrants, communities of color, and anyone concerned about government overreach or the sharing of data with outside agencies.

For these reasons, I urge the City Council not only to reject any expansion of Flock cameras, but to terminate the City's contract with Flock altogether. Costa Mesa should invest in community-based public safety solutions that build trust rather than surveillance systems that erode it.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

In Solidarity,
Boomer
Policy and Political Director | Chispa
e: [email protected]
c: 714.747.4271
1505 E 17th Street Suite 117 Santa Ana, CA 92705
Chispa is building a political home for young Latinxs in Orange County! Please consider making a donation to help us build our casita. Chispa is a project of Tides Advocacy, a 501c4 non-profit organization.

From: Stephanie Struck
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Re: Flock out of CM
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 8:28:31 AM
City of Costa Mesa,
As a resident of the city, I do NOT approve of the contract with any surveillance products including flock cameras. Surveillance does not make us safer, it further makes us the product for tech oligarchs and evil leaders who wish to surveillance Americans in our daily lives. Please cancel the contract immediately. The best way to keep Costa Mesa safe is to protect the residents and our privacy from these greedy companies. For people to stay in this city, and to trust our leaders, you must show a priority for our true safety and privacy.

Stephanie Struck
Local CM resident
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: ESCOBAR, SERGIO
To: CITY CLERK
Cc: TORRES, IVIS
Subject: Fw: Item 1 - New Business
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 10:11:01 AM
Attachments: Outlook-ljqtdcjw.png
Outlook-mds2bwam.png
Outlook-fiv0bpyf.png
Outlook-rflrtiub.png
Outlook-zgoslxko.png
Hello,
Please see below Public Comment.

Best regards,

Sergio Escobar
Management Analyst
City Manager’s Office
O: (714) 754-5156 | C: (714) 925-7457
77 Fair Drive | Costa Mesa | CA 92626

From: Mike Byer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 9:27 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Item 1 - New Business

Members of the Council –

https://costamesa.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?m=l&id=/matter.aspx?key=3743

Please vote down the idea of (FTHB) for the use of Measure Q funds. Public Safety / Park Maintenance are a much better use of the funds.

Mike Byer
Senior Vice President
Richland Communities, INC

1920 Main St. Suite 500
Irvine, CA 92614

Tel: 949.383.4137
From: Daniel Thomas Morgan
To: CITY CLERK; CITY COUNCIL
Subject: Cannabis Tax Revenue and First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program Date: Monday, June 15, 2026 6:18:30 PM
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,
I am writing to respectfully ask that the Council carefully consider alternative uses for the cannabis tax revenue currently proposed for a first-time homebuyer down payment assistance program.

While I understand and appreciate the desire to improve housing affordability, subsidizing demand is rarely an effective long-term solution. Economic theory and real-world experience have repeatedly demonstrated that demand-side subsidies can contribute to higher housing prices by increasing purchasing power without increasing the supply of housing. In a constrained housing market, these programs often benefit a small number of recipients while simultaneously putting upward pressure on prices for everyone else. As a result, the broader affordability challenge remains unresolved.

I would encourage the Council to consider whether these funds could be deployed in ways that benefit the entire community rather than a limited number of fortunate applicants.

As a member of the Finance and Pension Advisory Committee (FiPAC), I have become increasingly aware of several critical city needs that remain significantly underfunded. For example:
• The City's Arts and Culture programs continue to operate with limited resources despite the substantial community benefits they provide.
• Our Information Technology infrastructure requires significant investment. Some of the City's network switches are approximately 20 years old, despite having an expected useful life closer to seven years. Aging infrastructure increases operational risk and leaves the City vulnerable to service disruptions and cybersecurity concerns. Just recently, City Hall's email system was down for an extended period, significantly hampering staff productivity. • Additional funding could help preserve and expand successful public safety and quality-of- life programs, including retaining the Park Ranger position or potentially funding an additional full-time police officer.
• The City could also use these funds to reduce its unfunded pension liabilities, strengthening long-term fiscal stability and reducing future burdens on taxpayers.

Costa Mesa faces no shortage of important priorities competing for limited resources. Before committing cannabis tax revenues to a program that benefits only a small number of households and may inadvertently worsen affordability pressures, I believe the Council should thoroughly evaluate investments that would provide broader and more lasting benefits to the community as a whole.

Thank you for your consideration and for your service to the residents of Costa Mesa.

Sincerely,
Daniel Morgan
Member, Finance and Pension Advisory Committee (FiPAC)
Costa Mesa Resident
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: Priscilla Rocco
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Re: The proposed traffic signal at Fairview Road and Belfast Ave.

Date: Friday, June 12, 2026 5:39:52 PM
City Council,
It defies logic that instead of putting in the traffic calming speed humps that the Killybrooke residents requested - which are a reasonable cost and easy to install - the city is putting in a new traffic light at Fairview Road and Belfast Ave. with extensive curb changes. This WILL NOT stop the speeding in this family-friendly neighborhood. In fact, residents will probably be in more danger as drivers race on the yellow, trying to beat the red light.

Also, in our cost-conscious times, this just doesn't make sense.

Although Costa Mesa loves to tout its community outreach, there was only one meeting on this issue in March 2025, and the number of residents notified was greatly limited. This light will affect everyone who drives on Fairview Road, not just the residents of one tract, therefore it needs outreach to the entire area affected by it.

The City refuses to allow another community meeting, so this light is being put in against the wishes of the residents of this neighborhood, and without the knowledge of people who will be backed up behind the uncoordinated lights on this section for Fairview Road.

This signal light should be rejected because it is expensive, will be a headache of an installation, and will not calm the traffic in these neighborhoods. Listen to the residents and install speed humps like there are on College Ave. It has made that neighborhood behind Target safer for people walking and riding bikes. That's all residents want.

From: Lin Anderson
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: NO NO for Fairview/Belfast light
Date: Monday, June 15, 2026 5:12:38 PM
Please rethink adding traffic light@ Belfast as it is already congested area and MesaNorth folks impact to Fairview with Paularino school traffic being last including Mesa High and OCC that traffic is already very congested here..Only 3 car would;d be able to left off Belfast to fit between McCormick light not allowing Mesa North folks an exit…Mesa north already has lights at 3 exits that are long wait congestive build up traffic…Impatient drivers will run into the Fairview wall impacting Bismarck homes..Please rethink and fix pot holes and clean sidewalks and gutters instead..Thank you
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: TORRES, IVIS
To: GREEN, BRENDA; TERAN, STACY
Subject: Fw: Signal at Belfast & Fairview
Date: Monday, June 15, 2026 11:01:01 AM
Attachments: Outlook-a433msab.png
Outlook-uwwzgsnr.png
Outlook-gibhrkxp.png
Outlook-n2wgrfij.png
Outlook-khjmwtvx.png
Hi Brenda and Stacy,
Please see the public comment below from Gayle Luiso regarding the Belfast signal.

Thank you!
Kind regards,

Ivis D. Torres
Management Aide | Constituent Services Team
(714) 754-4867 (office) | (949) 629-5032 (cellphone)
77 Fair Drive | Costa Mesa | CA 92626

P Please take into account the environment before printing this email. Thank you! From: Gayle Luiso <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2026 3:59 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Signal at Belfast & Fairview

Good afternoon,
I am writing to tell you that I am against the addition of a signal light at Belfast! We live on Van Buren Ave and it will slow down and backup traffic on Fairview! We already have enough lights on Fairview, including the addition of a crosswalk and light coming out of the Apartments by Stater Bros. We need to consider what happens on Fairview!!! We have the Fairgrounds, OCC College, Costa Mesa Highschool, a Baptist Church and a very busy shopping area on both sides of the street.

Citizens of Costa Mesa deserve a well thought out plan for Fairview not having things done part and parcel. We don’t even understand what the thing is in the middle of Fairview just past Fair Drive.

Safety is first, convenience is second, and keeping the flow of traffic moving is third. The signal at Belfast will lock in the residents in the Presidents/Capital streets. The Irish streets have many options to access Fairview and Baker.

Poor planning is not good for Costa Mesa.

Sincerely,
Gayle and Len Luiso
Residents for almost 50 years
Sent from my iPhone
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report any suspicious activities to the Information Technology Department.

From: Cynthia McDonald
To: CITY CLERK
Cc: PETTIS, JEFF; REYNOLDS, ARLIS; CHAVEZ, MANUEL; STEPHENS, JOHN; Andrea Marr; GAMEROS, LOREN; BULEY, MIKE; [email protected] Subject: June 16, 2026 City Council Meeting - New Business #2 - Opposition to Proposed Traffic Signal at Belfast & Fairview Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026 11:13:59 AM
Attachments: image.png
Please accept this as my comment on New Business Item #2 on tonight's agenda.

Dear City Councilmembers,
I respectfully urge you to reconsider funding the proposed traffic signal at Belfast Avenue and Fairview Road.

While the project is presented as a safety and traffic improvement, it concentrates investment at a single intersection while broader, well- documented issues along the Fairview corridor remain unaddressed. Residents continue to contend with:

Potholes and deteriorating pavement
Dying trees and neglected landscaping
Aging and leaking utility infrastructure
Sidewalks that are not ADA-compliant
Fragmented and inconsistent bike lanes
Allocating $752,000 to a single signal—while these fundamental deficiencies persist—raises serious questions about priorities and equity in infrastructure investment.

Equally concerning is the lack of alignment with community input. Residents of the Killybrooke neighborhood originally requested traffic- calming measures, specifically speed humps, to address speeding on residential streets. Those requests were ultimately set aside, while this signal project—advanced at the request of a single Councilmember—moved forward.

The public outreach process has also been limited and uneven:

Only one community meeting was held (March 2025 at Halecrest Club) Notice was largely restricted to residents within 500 feet of the site Nearby Mesa North residents east of Fairview Road, who will be directly impacted, received little to no notification Requests for additional outreach opportunities were denied As a result, many affected residents remain unaware of this project and its potential consequences.

From a transportation standpoint, the benefits of this signal are unclear. The proposed signal would be coordinated with McCormack Lane but not with Paularino Avenue, and no signal is planned at Augusta Street. This lack of corridor-wide coordination calls into question whether traffic flow will improve—or worsen.

In fact, adding another signal to a stretch of Fairview where signals already exist within short distances may:

Increase congestion and delays
Lengthen traffic queues
Disrupt, rather than improve, traffic flow
Safety justification also appears limited. Data from nearby intersections over an 11-year period shows higher incident levels at existing signalized intersections compared to unsignalized ones, suggesting that a new signal may not deliver the intended safety benefits. See attached spreadsheet of service calls.

In summary:

The original community request has not been addressed
Public outreach has been insufficient and uneven
Many impacted residents remain uninformed
Traffic conditions may worsen rather than improve
Significant funding is being committed without broad community support More pressing infrastructure needs along Fairview remain unaddressed Given these concerns, I respectfully ask that you not approve funding for this project and instead prioritize solutions that reflect broader community needs and deliver meaningful improvements along the entire corridor.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Cynthia McDonald

Search Name: CAD incidents from 01 Jan 2014 to 20 Aug 2025 where Incident Type Code is 902T, 901T, 481, 483, 480, 901, 901NOI, 901F, 901 Data Type: CAD incidents
Title Agency Incident Ty Call Date & Time Incident Number Case Number City Address Incident Type Code & Description 25008457 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 6/30/2025 8:56 25008457 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/BELFAST AVE, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 25008147 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 6/24/25 0:39:00 25008147 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 25007396| ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 6/7/25 12:01:00 25007396 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 25006864| ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 5/27/25 1:37:00 25006864 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 25005300| ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 4/20/25 1:55:00 25005300 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 25004455| ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 4/4/25 0:09:00 25004455 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 25004436| 20001(A) VC | FELONY Costa Mesa Police Department 4/3/25 13:59:00 25004436 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/BELFAST AVE, COSTA MESA, USA HIT AND RUN RESULTING IN DEATH OR INJURY 25002830| ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 3/2/25 0:17:00 25002830 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 25000304| ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 1/7/25 9:38:00 25000304 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/BELFAST AVE, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY SAME INCIDENT NUMBER ↕ SAME INCIDENT NUMBER ↕
2025001946 | ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901 1/7/25 17:38:19 2025001946 25000304 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/BELFAST AVE, COSTA MESA, USA 901 - ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY 2024113410 | HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT Costa Mesa Police Department 481 12/8/24 17:49:02 2024113410 24016071 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 481 - HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT 2024111077 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 12/1/24 15:20:06 2024111077 24015752 COSTA MESA BELFAST AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2024074795 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 8/15/24 17:34:02 2024074795 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/AUGUSTA ST, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2024056310 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 6/22/24 15:39:33 2024056310 24008370 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/BELFAST AVE, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2024044397 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 5/16/24 8:44:42 2024044397 24006627 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2024039511 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 4/30/24 14:44:27 2024039511 24005924 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2024038278 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 4/26/24 12:55:29 2024038278 24005738 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/DORSET LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2024037878 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 4/25/24 11:01:55 2024037878 24005683 COSTA MESA DORSET LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2023121669 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 12/14/23 13:50:56 2023121669 23017891 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/DORSET LN, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2023104781 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 10/24/23 12:48:22 2023104781 23015538 COSTA MESA DORSET AT FAIRVIEW, COSTA MESA, 92626, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2023104246 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 10/22/23 19:16:50 2023104246 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2023099849 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 10/9/23 12:32:17 2023099849 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/DORSET LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2023078433 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 8/9/23 17:10:47 2023078433 23011735 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2023078142 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 8/9/23 2:27:45 2023078142 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/AUGUSTA ST, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2023065761 | ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901 7/6/23 17:31:54 2023065761 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 901 - ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY 2023052790 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 6/2/23 6:16:21 2023052790 23008042 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2022129139 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 12/24/22 14:34:41 2022129139 22020081 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2022129127 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 12/24/22 14:00:03 2022129127 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2022125893 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 12/15/22 7:57:16 2022125893 22019542 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2022097863 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 9/22/22 17:45:22 2022097863 22015201 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/DORSET LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2022059691 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 6/12/22 16:28:28 2022059691 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2022047168 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 5/10/22 20:37:39 2022047168 COSTA MESA DORSET LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2022041268 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 4/25/22 14:56:32 2022041268 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2022033626 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 4/5/22 9:04:00 2022033626 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2022029823 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 3/25/22 12:05:52 2022029823 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2022022047 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 3/4/22 8:11:56 2022022047 22003610 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2022018584 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 2/22/22 7:13:07 2022018584 22003002 COSTA MESA 1201 MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2022010932 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 1/31/22 19:54:00 2022010932 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2021124712 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 12/7/21 13:53:08 2021124712 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2021113914 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 11/6/21 14:25:12 2021113914 21018433 COSTA MESA BELFAST AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2021113907 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 11/6/21 13:39:03 2021113907 21018432 COSTA MESA BELFAST AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2021078573 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 8/2/21 13:39:48 2021078573 21012588 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2021078566 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 8/2/21 13:10:40 2021078566 21012587 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2021071298 | ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901 7/14/21 4:46:42 2021071298 21011504 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 901 - ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY 2021064038 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 6/26/21 13:11:16 2021064038 21010373 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2021046960 | HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT Costa Mesa Police Department 481 5/10/21 13:15:27 2021046960 21007548 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 481 - HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT 2021036289 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 4/10/21 15:36:16 2021036289 21005781 COSTA MESA DORSET LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2021013454 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 2/7/21 14:42:53 2021013454 COSTA MESA 1201 MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2020114376 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 11/18/20 12:11:56 2020114376 20015383 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/AUGUSTA ST, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2020112732 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 11/13/20 17:48:09 2020112732 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2020101723 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 10/13/20 13:02:06 2020101723 20013437 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2020025865 | HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT Costa Mesa Police Department 481 3/11/20 17:46:18 2020025865 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/BELFAST AVE, COSTA MESA, USA 481 - HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT 2020025084 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 3/9/20 15:37:24 2020025084 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2020012102 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 2/2/20 9:52:26 2020012102 20001596 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2020006184 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 1/17/20 15:53:03 2020006184 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019134066 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 12/21/19 11:31:22 2019134066 19018441 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2019130206 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 12/11/19 6:50:49 2019130206 19017873 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019119187 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 11/9/19 19:10:29 2019119187 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019114061 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 10/26/19 17:33:57 2019114061 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019103766 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 9/30/19 9:24:38 2019103766 19014347 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/DORSET LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019097556 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 9/13/19 19:59:59 2019097556 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/BELFAST AVE, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019087474 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 8/17/19 19:47:09 2019087474 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019067325 | HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT Costa Mesa Police Department 481 6/27/19 13:53:13 2019067325 19009488 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 481 - HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT 2019061649 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 6/12/19 15:52:30 2019061649 19008735 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/BELFAST AVE, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019051607 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 5/16/19 12:01:05 2019051607 19007376 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019038030 | HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT Costa Mesa Police Department 481 4/9/19 21:40:37 2019038030 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 481 - HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT 2019028409 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 3/15/19 16:18:02 2019028409 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/DORSET LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019026370 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 3/10/19 21:00:05 2019026370 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY Title Agency Incident Ty Call Date & Time Incident Number Case Number City Address Incident Type Code & Description 2019025969 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 3/9/19 18:23:23 2019025969 19003819 COSTA MESA 1201 MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019025954 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 3/9/19 17:33:00 2019025954 19003817 COSTA MESA 1201 MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019013166 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 2/5/19 7:58:33 2019013166 19001793 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/BELFAST AVE, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2019007051 | ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901 1/19/19 23:23:11 2019007051 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901 - ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY 2018104598 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 10/6/18 17:25:48 2018104598 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/BELFAST AVE, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2018093166 | HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT Costa Mesa Police Department 481 9/6/18 18:07:26 2018093166 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/AUGUSTA ST, COSTA MESA, USA 481 - HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT 2018078840 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 7/31/18 20:47:05 2018078840 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2018039449 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 4/19/18 7:33:12 2018039449 18005330 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2018003255 | HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT Costa Mesa Police Department 481 1/9/18 20:06:40 2018003255 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/AUGUSTA ST, COSTA MESA, USA 481 - HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT 2017130834 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 12/14/17 18:05:47 2017130834 17016503 COSTA MESA DORSET LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2017104681 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 10/4/17 12:29:15 2017104681 17013274 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/DORSET LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2017021920 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 3/1/17 9:12:19 2017021920 17002853 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2017021907 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 3/1/17 8:52:09 2017021907 17002852 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2016123124 | ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901 11/14/16 13:17:23 2016123124 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901 - ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY 2016114643 | ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901 10/23/16 19:09:41 2016114643 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901 - ACCIDENT UNKNOWN IF INJURY 2016106061 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 10/1/16 8:54:29 2016106061 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2016104839 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 9/28/16 13:02:06 2016104839 16013569 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2016050672 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 5/18/16 10:19:50 2016050672 16006976 COSTA MESA BELFAST AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2016045328 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 5/3/16 18:10:11 2016045328 16006275 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2016012938 | HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT Costa Mesa Police Department 481 2/6/16 10:42:02 2016012938 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/DORSET LN, COSTA MESA, USA 481 - HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT 2015127344 | HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT Costa Mesa Police Department 481 12/18/15 17:32:54 2015127344 15016965 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/DORSET LN, COSTA MESA, USA 481 - HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT 2015091946 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 9/13/15 17:57:23 2015091946 15012248 COSTA MESA BELFAST AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2015071740 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 7/25/15 8:31:20 2015071740 15009607 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2015031564 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 4/5/15 0:03:35 2015031564 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2014078567 | HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT Costa Mesa Police Department 481 12/10/14 8:00:50 2014078567 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 481 - HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT 2014075977 | ACCIDENT INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 901T 12/2/14 10:30:30 2014075977 14011852 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/MCCORMACK LN, COSTA MESA, USA 901T - ACCIDENT INJURY 2014051632 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 9/14/14 15:28:10 2014051632 14009026 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2014048519 | HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT Costa Mesa Police Department 481 9/4/14 13:22:19 2014048519 14008658 COSTA MESA W PAULARINO AVE/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 481 - HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT 2014034227 | HIT AND RUN TC PROPERTY DAMAGE Costa Mesa Police Department 483 7/21/14 13:05:04 2014034227 14007103 COSTA MESA FAIRVIEW RD/AUGUSTA ST, COSTA MESA, USA 483 - HIT AND RUN TC PROPERTY DAMAGE 2014017074 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 5/30/14 15:48:51 2014017074 14005350 COSTA MESA 3193 FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY 2014011353 | ACCIDENT NON INJURY Costa Mesa Police Department 902T 5/12/14 18:43:14 2014011353 COSTA MESA MCCORMACK LN/FAIRVIEW RD, COSTA MESA, USA 902T - ACCIDENT NON INJURY Belfast = 14
Augusta = 6
McCormack = 46
Paularino = 12
Dorset = 15

Costa Mesa City CouncilJune 16, 2026

Costa Mesa City Council
June 16, 2026