Agenda packet — Costa Mesa City Council, September 15, 2026 (part 1 of 7)

CITY OF COSTA MESA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY*
Agenda
City Council Chambers
77 Fair Drive
6:00 PMTuesday, September 15, 2026
*Note: All agency memberships are reflected in the title "Council Member" The City Council meetings are presented in a hybrid format, both in-person at City Hall and virtually via Zoom Webinar.

Closed Captioning is available via the Zoom option in English and Spanish.

Los subtítulos están disponibles a través de la opción Zoom en inglés y español.

TRANSLATION SERVICES AVAILABLE / SERVICIOS DE TRADUCCIÓN DISPONIBLE Please contact the City Clerk at (714) 754-5225 to request language interpreting services for City meetings. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make arrangements.

Favor de comunicarse con la Secretaria Municipal al (714) 754-5225 para solicitar servicios de interpretación de idioma para las juntas de la Ciudad. Se pide notificación por lo mínimo 48 horas de anticipación, esto permite que la Ciudad haga los arreglos necesarios.

Members of the public can view the City Council meetings live on COSTA MESA TV (SPECTRUM CHANNEL 3 AND AT&T U-VERSE CHANNEL 99) or
http://costamesa.granicus.com/player/camera/2?publish_id=10&redirect=true and online at youtube.com/costamesatv.

Page 1 of 11 ends

1 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING
AUTHORITY*
Agenda September 15, 2026
Members of the public are welcome to speak during the meeting when the Mayor opens the floor for public comment. There is no need to register in advance or complete a comment card. When it's time to comment, line up at one of the two podiums in the room and wait for your turn. Each speaker will have up to 3 minutes (or as directed) to address the City Council.

All attendees must remain seated while in the chamber until instructed by the Presiding Officer to approach and line up for public comment. To ensure safety and maintain order during the proceedings, standing or congregating in the aisles or foyer is strictly prohibited.

To maintain a respectful and orderly atmosphere during the meeting, attendees shall refrain from using horns or amplified speakers. Signs and props may be brought into the Chamber, provided they do not exceed 11 inches by 18 inches in size and do not hinder the visibility of other attendees. The possession of poles, sticks, or stakes is strictly prohibited.

Further information regarding the City's regulations on addressing the City Council and expected conduct during meetings are available at the following links.

Title 2: Administration
§ 2-61: Conduct while addressing the council.
https://ecode360.com/42609578
Title 2: Administration
§ 2-64: Disorderliness by members of the audience.
https://ecode360.com/42609598
The public may participate via the Zoom option.

Zoom Webinar:

Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89239729693?pwd=bud3puT2KgV4IanaaOCpTb6kpvCkja.1 Or sign into Zoom.com and “Join a Meeting”
Enter Webinar ID: 892 3972 9693 / Password: 179928
• If Zoom is not already installed on your computer, click “Download & Run Zoom” on the launch page and press “Run” when prompted by your browser. If Zoom has previously been installed on your computer, please allow a few moments for the application to launch automatically.
• Select “Join Audio via Computer.”
• The virtual conference room will open. If you receive a message reading, “Please wait for the host to start this meeting,” simply remain in the room until the meeting begins.
• During the Public Comment Period, use the “raise hand” feature located in the participants’ window and wait for city staff to announce your name and unmute your line when it is your turn to speak. Comments are limited to 3 minutes, or as otherwise directed.

Page 2 of 11 ends

2 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING
AUTHORITY*
Agenda September 15, 2026
Participate via telephone:

Call: 1 669 900 6833 Enter Webinar ID: 892 3972 9693 / Password: 179928 During the Public Comment Period, press *9 to "raise your hand" and to be added to the queue to speak and wait for city staff to announce your name/phone number and press *6 to unmute your line when it is your turn to speak. Comments are limited to 3 minutes, or as otherwise directed.

Note, if you have installed a zoom update, please restart your computer before participating in the meeting.

Additionally, members of the public who wish to make a written comment on a specific agenda item, may submit a written comment via email to the City Clerk at [email protected].

Any written communications, photos, or other materials for copying and distribution to the City Council that are 10 pages or less, can be e-mailed to [email protected], submitted to the City Clerk’s Office on a flash drive, or mailed to the City Clerk’s Office. Note that records submitted by the public will not be redacted in any way and will be posted online as submitted, including any personal contact information. Comments received by 12:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be provided to the City Council, made available to the public, and will be part of the meeting record.

All pictures, PowerPoints, and videos submitted for display at a public meeting must be previously reviewed by staff to verify appropriateness for general audiences. No links to YouTube videos or other streaming services will be accepted, a direct video file will need to be emailed to staff prior to each meeting in order to minimize complications and to play the video without delay. The video must be one of the following formats, .mp4, .mov or .wmv. Only one file may be included per speaker for public comments, for both videos and pictures. Please e-mail to the City Clerk at [email protected] NO LATER THAN 12:00 Noon on the date of the meeting. If you do not receive confirmation from the city prior to the meeting, please call the City Clerks office at 714-754-5225.

Items submitted for the overhead screen should be 1 page and provided to the City Clerk no later than 15 minutes prior to the start of the meeting.

Please know that it is important for the City to allow public participation at this meeting. If you are unable to participate in the meeting via the processes set forth above, please contact the City Clerk at (714) 754-5225 or [email protected] and staff will attempt to accommodate you. While the City does not expect there to be any changes to the above process for participating in this meeting, if there is a change, the City will post the information as soon as possible to the City’s website.

Note regarding agenda-related documents provided to a majority of the City Council after distribution of the City Council agenda packet (GC §54957.5): Any related documents provided to a majority of the City Council after distribution of the City Council Agenda Packets will be made available for public inspection. Such documents will be posted on the city’s website and will be available at the City Clerk's office, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 92626.

Page 3 of 11 ends

3 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING
AUTHORITY*
Agenda September 15, 2026
All cell phones and other electronic devices are to be turned off or set to vibrate. Members of the audience are requested to step outside the Council Chambers to conduct a phone conversation.

Free Wi-Fi is available in the Council Chambers during the meetings. The network username available is: CM_Council. The password is: cmcouncil1953.

As a LEED Gold Certified City, Costa Mesa is fully committed to environmental sustainability.

A minimum number of hard copies of the agenda will be available in the Council Chambers.

For your convenience, a binder of the entire agenda packet will be at the table in the foyer of the Council Chambers for viewing. Agendas and reports can be viewed on the City website at https://costamesa.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. Las agendas y los informes se pueden ver en español en el sitio web de la Ciudad en
https://www.costamesaca.gov/trending/current-agendas/spanish-city-council-agendas.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Assistive Listening headphones are available and can be checked out from the City Clerk. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (714) 754-5225. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].

En conformidad con la Ley de Estadounidenses con Discapacidades (ADA), aparatos de asistencia están disponibles y podrán ser prestados notificando a la Secretaria Municipal. Si necesita asistencia especial para participar en esta junta, comuníquese con la oficina de la Secretaria Municipal al (714) 754-5225. Se pide dar notificación a la Ciudad por lo mínimo 48 horas de anticipación para garantizar accesibilidad razonable a la junta. [28 CFR

35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].

Page 4 of 11 ends

4 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING
AUTHORITY*
Agenda September 15, 2026

REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 15, 2026 – 6:00 P.M.

JOHN STEPHENS
Mayor

MANUEL CHAVEZ ANDREA MARR Mayor Pro Tem - District 4 Council Member - District 3

ARLIS REYNOLDS LOREN GAMEROS Council Member - District 5 Council Member - District 2

JEFF PETTIS MIKE BULEY Council Member - District 6 Council Member - District 1

KIMBERLY HALL BARLOW CECILIA GALLARDO-DALY City Attorney City Manager

CALL TO ORDER

NATIONAL ANTHEM AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

MOMENT OF SOLEMN EXPRESSION
[Per Council Policy 000-12, these presentations are made by community volunteers stating their own views. The City Council disclaims any intent to endorse or sponsor the views of any speaker.]

ROLL CALL

CITY ATTORNEY CLOSED SESSION REPORT
PRESENTATIONS: NONE.

PUBLIC COMMENTS – MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Comments on Presentations and Consent Calendar items may also be heard at this time. Comments are limited to 3 minutes, or as otherwise directed.

Page 5 of 11 ends

5 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING
AUTHORITY*
Agenda September 15, 2026

COUNCIL MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS Each council member is limited to 3 minutes. Additional comments will be heard at the end of the meeting.

1. Council Member Buley

2. Council Member Gameros

3. Council Member Marr

4. Council Member Reynolds

5. Council Member Pettis

6. Mayor Pro Tem Chavez

7. Mayor Stephens
REPORT – CITY MANAGER
REPORT – CITY ATTORNEY

CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be acted upon in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the City Council, staff, or the public request specific items to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.

1. PROCEDURAL WAIVER: WAIVE THE FULL READING OF ALL

ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
26-404
RECOMMENDATION:

City Council and Housing Authority approve the reading by title only and waive further reading of Ordinances and Resolutions.

2. READING FOLDER 26-405
RECOMMENDATION:

City Council receive and file Claims received by the City Clerk and authorize staff to reject any and all Claims: Karina Ryabokonova.

3. ADOPTION OF WARRANT RESOLUTION 26-368
RECOMMENDATION:

City Council approve Warrant Resolution No. 2760.

1. Summary Check Registration 8-20-2026Attachments:

Page 6 of 11 ends

6 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING
AUTHORITY*
Agenda September 15, 2026

4. MINUTES 26-406
RECOMMENDATION:

City Council approve the minutes of the regular meeting of September 1, 2026.

1. 09-01-2026 Draft MinutesAttachments:

5. APPROVAL OF A SUMMARY VACATION OF EXCESS
RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 296 EAST 19TH STREET
26-393
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution 2026-xx ordering the summary vacation of a portion of right-of-way at 296 East 19th Street.

2. Authorize execution of the Quitclaim Deed by the Mayor and the City Clerk.

1. Location Map

2. Class III bicycle facility

3. PC Resolution 26-16

4. Proposed Resolution 2026-xx

5. Quitclaim Exhibit
Attachments:

6. APPROVAL OF A SUMMARY VACATION OF EXCESS
RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 405 EAST 19TH STREET
26-394
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution 2026-xx ordering the summary vacation of a portion of right-of-way at 405 East 19th Street.

2. Authorize execution of the Quitclaim Deed by the Mayor and the City Clerk.

1. Location Map

2. Class III bicycle facility

3. PC Resolution 26-16

4. Proposed Resolution 2026-xx

5. Quitclaim Exhibit
Attachments:

Page 7 of 11 ends

7 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING
AUTHORITY*
Agenda September 15, 2026

7. ACCEPTANCE AND ALLOCATION OF THE 2026-27 OFFICE OF

TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT FOR THE SELECTIVE TRAFFIC

ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
26-395
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve proposed Resolution No. 2026-XX, which ratifies the application for a grant award from the State of California - Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) for the grant period from October 1, 2026, to September 30, 2027.

2. Authorize an appropriation to revenue and expenditure in the amount of $275,500 for the 2026-27 OTS STEP Grant in the Office of Traffic Safety Fund (Fund 220).

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the grant documents, including the Grant Agreement, and accept and administer the grant.

1. Resolution No. 26-XX OTS Selective Traffic Enforcement Program

2. Grant Agreement
Attachments:

AT THIS TIME COUNCIL WILL ADDRESS ANY ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR
------------------------------END OF CONSENT CALENDAR------------------------------- PUBLIC HEARINGS:
(Pursuant to Resolution No. 05-55, Public Hearings begin at 7:00 p.m.)

1. CONTINUATION REQUEST OF THE CONSOLIDATED MASTER FEE

SCHEDULE
26-397
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council open the public hearing and continue the item to the October 20, 2026, meeting, pursuant to the department’s request.

Page 8 of 11 ends

8 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING
AUTHORITY*
Agenda September 15, 2026

2. CITY OF COSTA MESA SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATE (PCTY-25-0002), CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN (PCTY- 25-0009), AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE POLICY REVIEW (PCTY-26-0002)
26-388
RECOMMENDATION:

The Planning Commission recommends the City Council:

1. Find that the proposed Safety Element Update, Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, and Environmental Justice General Plan Policy Update are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), and, in addition, find that the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15307 and 15308.

2. Adopt a Resolution approving the Safety Element Update and Environmental Justice General Plan Policy Update.

In addition, staff recommends the City Council:

3. Adopt a Resolution approving the City of Costa Mesa Climate Action and Adaptation Plan.

Agenda Report

1. City Council Resolution CAAP

2. Exhibit A CAAP

3. City Council Resolution SE.EJ

4. Exhibit A General Plan Update SE and EJ

5. General Plan Updates Strikethrough

6. EJ Policies Summary

7. Public Comments

8. Planning Commission Resolution PC-2026-23

9. Planning Commission Agenda Report August 10, 2026

10. Draft Planning Commission Minutes August 10, 2026

11. Planning Commission Study Session Report July 27, 2026

12. Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2026
Attachments:

Page 9 of 11 ends

9 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING
AUTHORITY*
Agenda September 15, 2026

3. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF THE FAIRVIEW

DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED

AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING CODE, LAND USE ELEMENT OF

THE GENERAL PLAN AND CERTIFY THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT
26-381
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-XX titled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, California, Certifying the Environmental Impact Report and Adopting the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Fairview Developmental Center Specific Plan Project;” and

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-XX titled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, California, Amending the Land Use Element of the General Plan and Update the Land Use Map to Change the Land Use Designation of the 110 Acre Fairview Developmental Center (FDC) Site Located at 2501 Harbor Boulevard from Multi-Use Center to Refer to the 95 Acre FDC Specific Plan (FDCSP) and Change the Remaining 15 Acres to Public/Institutional;” and

3. Introduce Ordinance No. 2026-XX titled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, California, Adopting the Fairview Developmental Center Specific Plan (FDCSP) and Amend Sections 13- 20, 13-28, 13-30, Chapter V, Article 7, and Add Chapter XVIII “Specific Plans” to Title 13 of the Zoning Code, and Amend the Zoning Map to Change the Zoning Designation of the 110 Acre Fairview Developmental Center (FDC) Site Located at 2501 Harbor Boulevard to Refer to the 95 Acre FDCSP and Change the Remaining 15 Acres to Institutional and Recreational (I&R).”

Page 10 of 11 ends

10 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING
AUTHORITY*
Agenda September 15, 2026
Agenda Report

1. City Council Resolution - Certify EIR

2. City Council Resolution - General Plan Amendment

3. Exhibit A Land Use Element Amendment

4. Exhibit B Existing and Proposed Land Use Maps

5. City Council Ordinance - FDC Specific Plan and Zoning Code Amendments

6. Exhibit A FDC Specific Plan City Council Hearing Draft

7. Exhibit B Zoning Code Amendments

8. Exhibit C Existing and Proposed Zoning Map Amendments

9. Planning Commission Resolution

10. August 21, 2026 HCD Letter

11. September 4, 2026 DDS Letter

12. July 2, 2026 Department of General Services Letter
Attachments:

OLD BUSINESS: NONE.

NEW BUSINESS: NONE.

ADDITIONAL COUNCIL /BOARD MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND

SUGGESTIONS

ADJOURNMENT

Page 11 of 11 ends

11 CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-404 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
TITLE:

PROCEDURAL WAIVER: WAIVE THE FULL READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND

RESOLUTIONS
RECOMMENDATION:

City Council and Housing Authority approve the reading by title only and waive further reading of Ordinances and Resolutions.

Page 1 of 1 ends

12 CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-405 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
TITLE:

READING FOLDER
DEPARTMENT: City Manager’s Office/City Clerk’s Division RECOMMENDATION:

City Council receive and file Claims received by the City Clerk and authorize staff to reject any and all Claims: Karina Ryabokonova.

Page 1 of 1 ends

13 CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-368 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
TITLE:

ADOPTION OF WARRANT RESOLUTION
DEPARTMENT: FINANCE DEPARTMENT
PRESENTED BY: MARK KHOU, BUDGET & PURCHASING MANAGER
CONTACT INFORMATION: MARK KHOU, BUDGET & PURCHASING MANAGER AT (714) 754-5241
RECOMMENDATION:

City Council approve Warrant Resolution No. 2760.

BACKGROUND:

In accordance with Section 37202 of the California Government Code, the Director of Finance or their designated representative hereby certify to the accuracy of the following demands and to the availability of funds for payment thereof.

FISCAL REVIEW:

City operating expenses for $1,851,281.49.

Page 1 of 1 ends

14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-406 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
TITLE:

MINUTES
DEPARTMENT: City Manager’s Office/City Clerk’s Division RECOMMENDATION:

City Council approve the minutes of the regular meeting of September 1, 2026.

Page 1 of 1 ends

34 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 1 of 12

REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 - MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER – The Closed Session meeting was called to order by Mayor Stephens at 4:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL

Present: Council Member Buley, Council Member Gameros (arrived 4:08 p.m.), Council Member Marr, Council Member Pettis, Council Member Reynolds, Mayor Pro Tem Chavez, and Mayor Stephens.

Absent: None.

PUBLIC COMMENTS – NONE.

City Attorney Hall Barlow noted that closed session item no. 10 regarding James Alexander v. the City of Costa Mesa was withdrawn from the agenda and would not be discussed in closed session.

CLOSED SESSION ITEMS:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6, (a) Agency Designated Representative: Cecilia Gallardo-Daly, City Manager Name of Employee Organization: Costa Mesa City Employees Association (CMCEA)

2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6, (a) Agency Designated Representative: Cecilia Gallardo-Daly, City Manager Name of Employee Organization: Costa Mesa Confidential Unit

3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6, (a) Agency Designated Representative: Cecilia Gallardo-Daly, City Manager Name of Employee Organization: Costa Mesa Police Association (CMPA)

4. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6, (a) Agency Designated Representative: Cecilia Gallardo-Daly, City Manager Name of Employee Organization: Costa Mesa Police Management Association (CMPMA)
35 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 2 of 12

5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: City of Costa Mesa v. Ohio House LLC
Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2020-01146835-CU-OR-CJC

6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: City of Costa Mesa v. Ohio House, LLC, a California limited liability corporation; Richard Perlin, Nancy Perlin, Dolores Perlin, and Brandon Stump as individuals, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2018-01006173-CU-OR-NJC

7. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: Ohio House, LLC v. City of Costa Mesa, United States District Court, Central District of CA, Case No. 8:19 cv 01710 DOC (KESx)

8. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: Disability Rights California, a California non-profit corporation v. City of Costa Mesa, Cecilia Gallardo-Daly, City Manager, and Costa Mesa City Council Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2026-01581983-CU-WM-CJC

9. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: People of the State of California, ex rel, Rob Bonta, California Department of Housing and Community Development v. City of Costa Mesa Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2026-01583941-CU-WM-CJC

10. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: James Alexander v. City of Costa Mesa
Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2024-01441534-CU-PO-CJC

11. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of Case: RDK Group Holdings, LLC v. City of Costa Mesa, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30 2025 0149581 CU WM WJC

12. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8
APN: 139-032-11; Property: 3303 Hyland Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Agency Negotiator: Cecilia Gallardo-Daly, City Manager
Negotiating Parties: Lisa Kolieb, Partner with Akerman LLP Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
City Council recessed at 4:02 p.m. for Closed Session.

Closed Session adjourned at 5:50 p.m. and there was no reportable action taken. 36 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 3 of 12 CALL TO ORDER - The Regular City Council and Housing Authority meeting was called to order by Mayor Stephens at 6:00 p.m.

NATIONAL ANTHEM AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – A video was played of the National Anthem and the Mayor Pro Tem led the Pledge of Allegiance.

MOMENT OF SOLEMN EXPRESSION – Led by Pastor Phil Eyskens from Lighthouse Church.

ROLL CALL

Present: Council Member Buley, Council Member Gameros, Council Member Marr, Council Member Pettis, Council Member Reynolds, Mayor Pro Tem Chavez, and Mayor Stephens.

Absent: None.

CITY ATTORNEY CLOSED SESSION REPORT – No reportable action was taken.

PRESENTATIONS:

The City Council recognized the Newport-Mesa Girls Softball 12U Silver All-Star Team The City Council provided a Proclamation to Malia Cary, Government Affairs Director from Second Harvest Food Bank in recognition of Hunger Action Month 2026.

PUBLIC COMMENTS – MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Speakers in the Council Chambers:

Speaker, spoke in opposition to the Flock camera contract.

Jay Humphrey, spoke regarding the Harbor Soaring Society’s continued flying at Fairview Park, requested that the City Council take action to relocate the group, and expressed concerns about the environmental damage.

Speaker, spoke in opposition to the Flock camera contract.

Shawn Wehan, founder of Songs in the Canyon, advocated for the arts, and spoke on creative ideas for funding for the Arts.

Joe Miracle, owner of a small business in Costa Mesa, spoke on a problem with Ware Disposal for trash services.

Speakers on Zoom:

Priscilla Rocco spoke in opposition to the Flock camera contract.

Speaker, spoke in opposition to reducing the public comment period to two minutes at the July 21st meeting, and spoke in opposition to the Flock camera contract. 37 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 4 of 12

COUNCIL MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS Council Member Pettis spoke in remembrance of September 11 th, spoke on the Costa Mesa Historical Society event on September 6 th at 2:00 p.m. at Orange Coast College and encouraged residents to attend, spoke on attending an upcoming event with Mayor Stephens on Thursday at 6:30 p.m. on the Fairview Developmental Center, and wished niece Sydney Thompson a happy birthday.

Council Member Buley spoke on attendance at the Families Forward Gala, praised the Historical Society on their special events, and asked staff to monitor development in AI efficiencies and spoke about an article on the City of Laguna Beach partnering with Crossbeam to incorporate AI into its plan check processes.

Council Member Gameros spoke on cooling stations in the City, spoke on the progress of Ketchum-Libolt Park construction, spoke in remembrance of September 11th, and spoke on the Thursday night event on the Fairview Developmental Center.

Council Member Marr spoke on visitors from Australia meeting with Love Costa Mesa, praised Love Costa Mesa, spoke on visiting the Homeless Shelter, spoke on the Historical Society’s 60th anniversary event, requested an update on the Flock contract be placed on the next City Council meeting agenda, spoke on revisiting an ethics policy, requested staff to track conflict of interests and campaign donations to promote transparency, and requested staff to follow up with the individual having trouble with Ware Disposal.

Council Member Reynolds supports bringing back the Flock contract at the next meeting for an update, requested an update on the Flock audit logs that have been requested through public records requests, spoke on Hunger Action Month and thanked Second Harvest Food Bank, and requested staff to publicize information on food resources, spoke on heat exhaustion and sharing information on cooling centers, spoke on the Historical Society’s 60th anniversary event, and support for bringing back the Fish Fry parade, spoke about back-to-school traffic concerns and on street calming measures, requested an update on the Safe Routes to School project, noted that September 20 th is the annual bike ride with the Costa Mesa Historical Society, and that September 26th is the Orange County Soccer Club’s Costa Mesa night.

Mayor Pro Tem Chavez spoke on the September 2 nd outreach meeting for Shalimar Park from 6:00 p.m.- 8:00 p.m.

Mayor Stephens spoke on adjourning the meeting in memory of Beth Refakes, spoke on the event on Thursday regarding the Fairview Developmental Center, agreed with Council Member Buley to research implementation of AI, spoke on Brackens Kitchen food competition fundraiser on September 10 th, spoke on attending the Costa Mesa Historical Society Gala, spoke in remembrance of September 11 th, thanked Mayor Pro Tem Chavez for running the meeting on August 4th, and spoke in honor of Beth Refakes and also adjourning the meeting in honor of Dolly Parton.

REPORT – CITY MANAGER – Ms. Gallardo-Daly spoke on the Measure C informational page on the City website, spoke on National Preparedness Month, the Alert OC regional test on September 16th at 10:00 a.m., and recognized Hoon Jo, Information Technology Programmer Analyst II for receiving the City Manager Leadership Award. 38 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 5 of 12 REPORT – CITY ATTORNEY – NONE.

CONSENT CALENDAR
MOVED/SECOND: Mayor Pro Tem Chavez/ Council Member Marr MOTION: Approve the Consent Calendar except for item no. 6.

The motion carried by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Council Member Buley, Council Member Gameros, Council Member Marr, Council Member Pettis, Council Member Reynolds, Mayor Pro Tem Chavez, and Mayor Stephens.

Nays: None.

Absent: None.

Abstain: None.

Motion carried: 7-0

1. PROCEDURAL WAIVER: WAIVE THE FULL READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND

RESOLUTIONS
ACTION:

City Council and Housing Authority approved the reading by title only and waived further reading of Ordinances and Resolutions.

2. READING FOLDER
ACTION:

City Council received and filed Claims received by the City Clerk and authorized staff to reject any and all Claims: Paul Beckett, Kathleen DeVine, Trinh Pham Kiem, Gustavo Ortiz, Raymundo Ortiz, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Teresa Rescalvo De Ortiz), State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Ellie Savee).

3. ADOPTION OF WARRANT RESOLUTION
ACTION:

City Council approved Warrant Resolution No. 2759.

4. MINUTES
ACTION:

City Council approved the minutes of the special closed session and study session of May 13, 2025, townhall meeting of October 15, 2025, and the regular meetings of June 16, 2026, July 21, 2026, and August 4, 2026.
39 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 6 of 12

5. AUTHORIZE THE USE OF SOURCEWELL PUBLIC SECTOR NATIONAL

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH FONROCHE LIGHTING AMERICA FOR THE

PURCHASE OF SOLAR LIGHTING EQUIPMENT FOR THE JOANN AND

CORNERSTONE BIKE TRAILS
ACTION:

1. City Council authorized the use of Sourcewell, Cooperative Agreement No. 041525-FNR with Fonroche Lighting America, valid until July 22, 2029, for the purchase of solar lighting equipment for the Joann and Cornerstone Bike Trails.

2. Authorized the purchase of lighting equipment for the Joann and Cornerstone Bike Trails for $116,152 through Fonroche Lighting America.

3. Authorized the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the necessary agreement and future authorized amendments to the agreement.

7. ACCEPTANCE AND ALLOCATION OF CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PROGRAM

FUNDS TO ENHANCE TRAFFIC SAFETY
ACTION:

1. City Council approved Resolution No. 2026-37, which ratifies and accepts a grant award from the State of California - California Highway Patrol (CHP) for the Cannabis Tax Fund Program (CTFGP) and authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute the grant documents, including the Grant Agreement, and accept and administer the grant.

2. Approved revenue and expense appropriations in the amount of $92,160 respectively, for the 2026-27 CHP CTFGP Grant in the State Grant Fund (Fund 231).

ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR

6. CALTRANS SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANT PROGRAM AWARD
Public Comments: None.

MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Reynolds/Mayor Stephens
MOTION: Approve staff recommendation.

The motion carried by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Council Member Buley, Council Member Gameros, Council Member Marr, Council Member Pettis, Council Member Reynolds, Mayor Pro Tem Chavez, and Mayor Stephens.

Nays: None.

Absent: None.

Abstain: None.

Motion carried: 7-0
40 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 7 of 12 ACTION:

1. City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-36, accepting the Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant.

2. Authorized an appropriation increase to both the revenue and expenditure in the amount of $297,500 for the grant in the State Grant Fund (Fund 231). ------------------------------END OF CONSENT CALENDAR------------------------------- OLD BUSINESS:

1. ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 13 (PLANNING, ZONING, AND

DEVELOPMENT), OF THE COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATING LAND

USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR VARIOUS NON-RESIDENTIAL USES INCLUDING

BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PERSONAL SERVICES, ARTISAN STUDIO, ACTIVE

ENTERTAINMENT USES, EVENT CENTERS AND ASSEMBLY USES, FITNESS

USES, AND OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL USES AND STANDARDS- ZONING CODE AMENDMENT PCTY-26-0001
Presentation by Ms. Caron, Planning Manager.

Public Comments: None.

MOVED/SECOND: Mayor Pro Tem Chavez/ Council Member Reynolds MOTION: Approve staff recommendation.

The motion carried by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Council Member Buley, Council Member Gameros, Council Member Marr, Council Member Pettis, Council Member Reynolds, Mayor Pro Tem Chavez, and Mayor Stephens.

Nays: None.

Absent: None.

Abstain: None.

Motion carried: 7-0
ACTION:

City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2026-07, approving revisions to Title 13 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to update land use classifications for various non-residential uses including but not limited to, personal services, artisan studio, active entertainment uses, event centers and assembly uses, fitness uses, and other non-residential uses and standards.
41 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 8 of 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS:
(Pursuant to Resolution No. 05-55, Public Hearings begin at 7:00 p.m.)

1. CONTINUATION REQUEST OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S

DECISION TO UPHOLD THE ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR’S DECISION TO DENY A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION REQUEST

TO DEVIATE FROM CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING CODE TO OPERATE A SOBER LIVING HOME. OPERATED BY THE OHIO HOUSE AT 115

EAST WILSON STREET, UNITS A THROUGH E
Public Comments: None.

MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Marr/Mayor Pro Tem Chavez
MOTION: Approve staff recommendation.

The motion carried by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Council Member Buley, Council Member Gameros, Council Member Marr, Council Member Pettis, Council Member Reynolds, Mayor Pro Tem Chavez, and Mayor Stephens.

Nays: None.

Absent: None.

Abstain: None.

Motion carried: 7-0
ACTION:

City Council continued the open public hearing to the October 20, 2026, meeting, pursuant to the applicant’s request.

2. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE SIXTH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT (2021-2026) OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA GENERAL PLAN (PCTY-26-0003) TO ADD ADDITIONAL HOUSING

ELEMENT OPPORTUNITY SITES, ASSOCIATED REVISIONS (INCLUDING

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE POLICIES), AND DETERMINE THE AMENDMENTS

EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Presentation by Ms. Tai, Community Development Director, Ms. McGill, Planning Manager, Ms. Halligan, Senior Planner, and Sohab Mehmood and Cathy Tang Saez from Dudek.

Public Comments:

Speakers in the Council Chambers:

Aaron Klemm spoke on completing all required zoning and approving the Housing Element.

Jay Humphrey spoke on high density and high rises south of the 405, spoke on in-lieu fees, and expressed concern on density and heights.
42 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 9 of 12 Rick Huffman spoke on the lack of transparency, spoke on density, and piecemeal zoning without a clear vision on how to support the growth.

Cynthia McDonald spoke on the lack of a full and transparent discussion regarding the impacts of the EIR, expressed concerns on what may have been omitted, spoke on air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and heat effects when considered collectively.

Kathy Esfahani, Affordable Housing Coalition, spoke in support of the proposed Housing Element and on strengthening the inclusionary housing ordinance.

Dianne Russell, Member of the Costa Mesa Affordable Housing Coalition, spoke in support of the item.

Steve Dzida spoke in support of the item.

Annie McCray spoke on Measure K and owning a property that was not identified as a Measure K site and would like to be included.

Maria Dzida spoke in support of the item.

Speakers on Zoom:

Ugochi Anaebere-Nicholson, Public Interest Law Project and Disability Rights California, spoke in opposition to the Housing Element in its current form, because it does now substantially comply with the law pertaining to individuals living with disabilities.

Christine Nolf, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the item as recommended.

MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Marr/Mayor Stephens
MOTION: Approve staff recommendation.

The motion carried by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Council Member Buley, Council Member Gameros, Council Member Marr, Council Member Pettis, Council Member Reynolds, Mayor Pro Tem Chavez, and Mayor Stephens.

Nays: None.

Absent: None.

Abstain: None.

Motion carried: 7-0
ACTION:

City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-38 to approve a General Plan Amendment to amend the City of Costa Mesa Sixth Cycle (2021-2029) Housing Element of the City’s General Plan to add additional Housing Element Opportunity Sites needed to maintain Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) capacity, remove certain Housing Element Opportunity Sites, adopt associated revisions (including environmental justice policies) and the associated Environmental Quality Act environmental determination. 43 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 10 of 12 City Council recessed into a break at 9:31 p.m.

City Council reconvened at 9:46 p.m.

3. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY’S INTENT TO OVERRULE THE ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION’S INCONSISTENCY DETERMINATION FOR

THE CITY OF COSTA MESA NEIGHBORHOODS WHERE WE ALL BELONG

ZONING UPDATES AND HOUSING ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION
Presentation by Ms. Halligan, Senior Planner.

Public Comments: None.

MOVED/SECOND: Mayor Pro Tem Chavez/ Council Member Marr MOTION: Approve staff recommendation.

The motion carried by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Council Member Buley, Council Member Gameros, Council Member Marr, Council Member Pettis, Council Member Reynolds, Mayor Pro Tem Chavez, and Mayor Stephens.

Nays: None.

Absent: None.

Abstain: None.

Motion carried: 7-0
ACTION:

1. City Council conducted a public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 2026-39 regarding the City’s intent to overrule the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission’s inconsistency determination for the City of Costa Mesa Neighborhoods Where We All Belong Zoning Updates and Housing Element Implementation.

2. Directed City staff to forward the Resolution to the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), and after 45 days, schedule a City Council public hearing to consider overruling ALUC’s determination.

NEW BUSINESS:

1. ADOPTION OF THE AGREEMENTS FOR SUCCESSOR MEMORANDA OF

UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF COSTA MESA (CITY) AND THE

COSTA MESA POLICE ASSOCIATION (CMPA), THE COSTA MESA POLICE

MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (CMPMA), THE COSTA MESA CITY EMPLOYEES

ASSOCIATION (CMCEA) AND THE CONFIDENTIAL UNIT AND THE ADOPTION OF

ACCOMPANYING SALARY RESOLUTIONS, AND CMCEA ANNUAL

COMPENSATIONS UPDATES
Ex-Parte Communications: Council Members Buley and Marr, Mayor Pro Tem Chavez, and Mayor Stephens met with employee associations.

Presentation by Ms. Lee, Human Resources Manager.
44 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 11 of 12 Public Comments: None.

MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Gameros/Mayor Stephens
MOTION: Approve staff recommendation.

The motion carried by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Council Member Buley, Council Member Gameros, Council Member Marr, Council Member Pettis, Council Member Reynolds, Mayor Pro Tem Chavez, and Mayor Stephens.

Nays: None.

Absent: None.

Abstain: None.

Motion carried: 7-0
ACTION:

1. City Council approved and adopted Agreement for Successor MOU between the City of Costa Mesa and CMPA.

2. Approved and adopted Agreement for Successor MOU between the City of Costa Mesa and CMPMA.

3. Approved and adopted Agreement for Successor MOU between the City of Costa Mesa and CMCEA.

4. Approved and adopted Resolution Number 2026-40 revising the pay ranges for CMPA.

5. Approved and adopted Resolution Number 2026-41 revising the pay ranges for CMPMA.

6. Approved and adopted Resolutions Number 2026-42 and 2026-43 revising the pay ranges for CMCEA.

7. Approved and adopted Resolution Number 2026-44 revising the pay ranges for the Confidential Unit.

8. Approved and adopted Resolution Number 2026-45 revising the pay ranges for Deputy Police Chief.

9. Approved and adopted Resolution Number 2026-46 revising the pay ranges for Police Recruit.

10.Approved and adopted Resolution Number 2026-47 revising the pay range for Reserve Senior Public Safety Dispatcher.

11.Authorized the City Manager and members of the City’s Negotiation Team to execute the Memoranda of Agreement documents.
45 Minutes – Regular Meeting September 1, 2026 Page 12 of 12

ADDITIONAL COUNCIL/BOARD MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS – NONE.

ADJOURNMENT – Mayor Stephens adjourned the meeting to Closed Session at 10:08 p.m. in honor and memory of Beth Refakes, Dolly Parton, and Chris Keaner.

Minutes adopted on this 15th day of September, 2026.
___________________________
John Stephens, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk
46 CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-393 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
TITLE:

APPROVAL OF A SUMMARY VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 296 EAST 19TH STREET
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION PRESENTED BY: RAJA SETHURAMAN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
CONTACT INFORMATION: SEUNG YANG, P.E., CITY ENGINEER (714) 754-5335 RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution 2026-xx ordering the summary vacation of a portion of right-of-way at 296 East 19th Street.

2. Authorize execution of the Quitclaim Deed by the Mayor and the City Clerk.

BACKGROUND:

At the request of the property owner, Public Works staff has reviewed a request to vacate excess right-of-way at 296 East 19th Street (Attachment 1).

Previous City and County Master Plans of Highways designated East 19th Street as a 4-lane highway; however, the Master Plan designation of the street was downgraded to a 2-lane collector street. As a result, the previously dedicated right-of-way required to construct a 4-lane highway is no longer required. Presently, East 19th Street has been constructed to meet the current Master Plan and Streets and Highways capacity requirements.

ANALYSIS:

In accordance with the prior Master Plan in 1977, 23.00-by-49.27-foot of right-of-way along East 19th Street was dedicated by Parcel Map, as shown and filed in Book 98, Pages 21 and 22. East 19th Street at this location was not improved to the full dedication width and was subsequently downgraded to a collector street, creating excess right-of-way.

Currently, there are no utilities within this portion of the public right-of-way, and therefore, a reservation for a utility easement is not required. The Engineering and Transportation Services Divisions, as well as the Active Transportation Committee (ATC), have reviewed the excess right-of- way. It was determined that East 19th Street is classified as a Class III bicycle facility, and consequently additional right-of-way is not required for any motorist and non-motorist usage.

Page 1 of 3 ends

47 File #: 26-393 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
Attachment 2 shows a typical street cross-section of East 19th Street as a Class III bicycle facility.

The vacation of this portion of excess right-of-way is in conformance with the objectives of the General Plan Circulation Element and conforms to the California Streets and Highways Code Section 8334(a), which allows a local agency to summarily vacate excess right-of-way that is not required for street or highway purposes. The ATC reviewed the request for the subject easement vacation on May 13, 2026, and unanimously recommended the right-of-way vacation.

On July 13, 2026, a report was presented to the Planning Commission outlining the proposed vacation as required by Government Code Section 65402. Subsequently, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC-26-16 (Attachment 3) finding that the proposed vacation of the subject portion of East 19th Street excess right-of-way is consistent with the City’s General Plan.

The vacation of streets or highways may proceed without a public hearing by meeting specific provisions of the California Streets and Highways Code Sections 8330 through 8334.5, inclusive. The major conditions that must be met to avoid a public hearing are:

1. The road has not been used by the public for at least five (5) years.

2. No utilities are constructed within the road.

3. Only one property ownership is affected.

The subject street vacation meets all of the above criteria and therefore a public hearing is not required. Staff has prepared the attached Resolution 2026-xx ordering the vacation of excess right-of -way (Attachment 4). Staff also recommends that a Quitclaim Deed be executed relinquishing the City of any interest in said excess right-of-way (Attachment 5).

ALTERNATIVES:

The City may retain the excess right-of-way and continue to be responsible for its maintenance and safety. However, this portion of right-of-way is not necessary for any public or utility purposes and is deemed unnecessary for any motorist and non-motorist public usage now or in the future.

FISCAL REVIEW:

Upon vacation, the area becomes taxable square footage, resulting in additional property taxes to the adjacent property owner to whom the land will revert. Based on this assessment, it is estimated that the County property tax for the additional parcel added to the property would be assessed at $300 to $400 more than the current assessment. The City’sshare of property tax assessed by the County is $0.15 for every dollar collected. The approval of this item would have an estimated net positive impact of between $45 to $60 annually to the City in the General Fund (Fund 101).

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney’sOffice has reviewed and approved this report and the attached Resolution as to form.

Page 2 of 3 ends

48 File #: 26-393 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This project supports the following City Council goal:
· Diversify, Stabilize and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution 2026-xx ordering the summary vacation of a portion of right-of-way at 296 East 19th Street.

2. Authorize execution of the Quitclaim Deed by the Mayor and the City Clerk.

Page 3 of 3 ends

49 23’
ATTACHMENT 1
50 EXIST
R/W

8.0' PARKING LANE4-----ll--

10.0' 12.0' 12.0'

30.0' 30.0'

40.0'

60.0'
CLASS Ill (BLVD.)

CROSS SECTION
EXIST.

R/W
i--++-+8.0' PARKING LANE

10.0'
ATTACHMENT 2
51 RESOLUTION NO. PC-2026-16

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA FINDING THAT THE

VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY BY THE CITY OF
COSTA MESA ADJACENT TO 296 EAST I9TH STREET IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY OF COSTA MESA 2015-
2035 GENERAL PLAN

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the Costa Mesa City Council adopted the City of Costa Mesa 2015- 2035 General Plan (General Plan) on June 21, 2016; WHEREAS, the Government Code of the State of California, Section 65402, provides in part that a local agency shall not acquire or lease real property nor abandon or dispose of any real property, nor construct a public building or structure in any county or city, until the location, purpose, and extent of such activity has been reported upon as to conformity with the adopted General Plan applicable thereto; WHEREAS, the California Streets and Highways Code, Chapter 4, Section 8334(a) authorizes the legislative body of a local agency to summarily vacate excess street or highway right of way that is not required for street or highway purposes; WHEREAS, the proposed right-of-way vacation has been reviewed by the Engineering and Transportation Services Divisions, and it has been determined that this portion of East I 9th Street is not necessary for public street and highway purposes; WHEREAS, the subject right-of-way is located to the west of the intersection of East 1 9th Street and Santa Ana Avenue;
WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa proposes to vacate a portion of the East 19th Street right-of-way adjacent to the property at 405 East I 9th Street; WHEREAS, even with the requested vacation, the remaining right-of-way on East 19th Street would still provide a 60-foot right-of-way, including a 10-foot public parkway, consistent with the City's Master Plan of Highways, which designates this portion of East 19th Street as a Collector Arterial (two-lanes with no median and a 60-foot total right-of- way);
ATTACHMENT 3
52 WHEREAS, the property at 296 East 19th Street abutting the subject right-of-way will revert back to the owner of 296 East 19th Street and is designated as Low Density Residential by the City General Plan;
WHEREAS, the excess right-of-way being vacated has been found by the Engineering and Transportation Divisions to be unnecessary for any present or future motorist and non-motorist use, and as such, the vacation serves the public interest and is a public benefit as it eliminates any maintenance costs and liabilities imposed on the City associated with the excess right-of-way;
WHEREAS, The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental procedures, and has been found to be exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3) (General Rule), in that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed vacation will have a significant effect on the environment; WHEREAS, the CEQA determination reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis;
WHEREAS, the subject property is shown in Attachment 2 to the Planning Commission staff report (City Engineer's Memo) dated June 8, 2026; WHEREAS, on July 13, 2026, the Costa Mesa Planning Commission reviewed the proposed street vacation and General Plan conformance findings.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find that the location, purpose, and extent of the proposed vacation of an approximately 23 foot by 50 foot portion of excess East 19th Street right of way adjacent to 296 East 19th Street, as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibits A and B, are in conformity with the City of Costa Mesa 2015-2035 General Plan.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission finds, based upon the information presented in the staff report and supporting materials, that the subject right of way is not necessary for present or prospective street or highway purposes and transmits this General Plan conformity determination to the City Council for consideration of the proposed summary vacation pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Sections 8334 through 8336.
53 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of July, 2026.

Jeffr rlan Chair
Costa Mesa Planning Commission
54 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )
1, Carrie Tai, Secretary to the Planning Commission of the City of Costa Mesa, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. PC-2026-16 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City of Costa Mesa Planning Commission held on July 13, 2026 by the following votes:

AYES: Harlan, Zich, Andrade, Klepack, Martinez, Rojas NOES: None
ABSENT: Dickson
ABSTAIN: None
Carricretary
Costa Mesa Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC-2026-16
55 3DNVH0 lrJ AlNnr):)
92 aavri gz> wxig
dV/'l S,HC1SS3SS!f
531:)Hl:1 Ni NMOHS
SH39/VnN 13:)HVd
!" )4:)C11E1 S,H[JSS3SS!t - 310N
k!-E16 'Nod
ir-iz nn
9r-12 '?t'fil
6E-1 Z 'fl "W
tg-* "/VW
dVW 13:)HVd
9ZEi 'ON lml
Ill 'ON l:lVHl
191 '(JN lml
SIH!it 3H 1 HO&i3N
6164 H:)HVN
3nN-1AV
.+l yi
fit
5aart
(m,
.allL-
.iiaal.ii'a
122
it . gnffi
i
i' @
yl
-F-in'i+,l?
@
OX
@
q
,81
"Jt 'l .ar
e
:;
S,
(/'),
m:5
m
.W
gza, # .ll'lll
X Q
t! (Z!j *z
&
I
z
t @ .. -'?, 01, [2
ooi zz
f JIZ!/ ,
@ %
%E .j-as# s,:igl
I.vl
n
?tty m atl
6 OS 12' @ t
.zp'zirz jl
'(g
g jl;lXr
@ a 0g N a@ s
4PV1/
91 - (= (,
'i: @ = Ol 61
.J#'llT
@ '-
I 4rlil
, (5) "Gl
@,
j'#
-" @ §g a
#J
- 0 (,
, j ..ii+- 'Jar
), @ '
0 kl
G (61) i- 8
, @ \e
jl
o
" (g) z
g(3,0 :i 8
0, rl
Y
.il
k ,4
nl'
('}{i 0, 51
m
.tl
@ s
, 0, XI @ & , 6 0, !9101 0. ,
s 11si
@(Zl @ - OX kl " @ s
.:=. U, 0=:
(!'
' @ %,,,.,, i:ffHl' K O " II @ g,,,.,,, IJVHI"
"4 71 j ' nAl )- .et I .01
, 61 l
ri g
21 6 ')
'1 - (Z (l . Jy, rq
hi rq
m, ,lTh: 0t 71 01 @ gel %1a .tssry lit Jl'llt D Rl " '= 3nN3A V K i
L
J * vw mvsl
C:i rs I r. " I "
m ! (6) (2/
f$f/
%l 1" m
jHO&3N
02(R HDSS3SSY AlNn(13 lHllklJdO:l
(13AH3S3H SlHOld nV
a3:lnmH:IM 3E1 (n ION aS3Sn H3H10 Jmj
Ali1rEIVll mV SMnS!,V dON A:lVHn:l:IV !fj
ajlNO S3SOdHrW M3(1 kKm3SSV AlNnO:l
31NV)40 H(34 0:*lVd3&l SVM elV!l SIHI
v +iqiqx-i
56 Exhibit B
296 E. 19th STREET
= PROPOSED AREA TO BE VACATED
57 ATTACHMENT 4
Resolution No. 2026-xx Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-xx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF EAST 19TH STREET AT 296 EAST 19TH STREET

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY FIND AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the property owners of 296 East 19th Street have requested that the City of Costa Mesa (“City”) vacate a portion of the East 19th Street right -of-way located adjacent to the property at 296 East 19th Street; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to vacate a portion of the East 19th Street right -of- way located adjacent to the property at 296 East 19th Street, as more particularly described in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, hereafter referred to as the “area to be vacated”; and
WHEREAS, Section 8334(a) of the California Streets and Highways Code allows a local agency to summarily vacate an excess right -of-way of a street or high way not required for street or highway purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported to the City Council that the area to be vacated is excess right-of-way not required for street or highway purposes; and WHEREAS, there are no public utilities located in the area to be vacated; and WHEREAS, on May 13, 2026, the Active Transportation Committee reviewed the vacation request and unanimously approved it; and
WHEREAS, on July 13, 2026, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.

PC-26-16, finding that the proposed vacation of a portion of the East 19th Street right-of- way adjacent to the property located at 296 East 19th Street is consistent with the City’s General Plan, serves the public interest, and is a public benefit.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R ESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Costa Mesa does hereby declare its intention to vacate a portion of the East 19 th Street right-of-way located adjacent to the property at 296 East 19th Street, as more particularly described in Exhibits A and B. The original 1977 dedication is in excess of the final alignment of East 19th Street, which was 58 ATTACHMENT 4
Resolution No. 2026-xx Page 2 of 3
amended in 2005. The purpose of this vacation is based on a review of the current and future needs of the City and to vacate the excess land to the underlying fee owner.

Section 2 . The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 2026.

John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

___________________________________ ________________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

59 ATTACHMENT 4
Resolution No. 2026-xx Page 3 of 3
THIS PAGE IS RESERVED FOR THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is t he original of Resolution No. 20 26-xx and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of September, 2026, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 16th day of September, 2026.

___________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

60 Recording Requested by CITY OF COSTA MESA
When Recorded Mail to:

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Attention - City Clerk
P.O. BOX 1200
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92628-1200
ATTACHMENT 5
Mail Tax Statements to:

Owner (s) of Record
APN: 426-281-22 Deed No.: 4059
TCA: 15-007
Location: 296 E. 19TH STREET Exempt Recording Requested per Government Code 27383

QUITCLAIM DEED
(AS TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENT RIGHTS)
THE UNDERSIGNED DECLARE(S) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS NONE.

GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY EXEMPT CITY OF COSTA MESA
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, City of Costa Mesa, a Municipal Corporation
do/does hereby remise, release and forever quitclaim to Adam Zeen and Erika Zeen, Husband and Wife as Community Property , the following described real property, in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California:

SEE RESOLUTION NO.2 6-xx , RECORDED
AS INSTRUMENT NO. OF OFFICIAL

RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER,

ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ATTACHED HERETO AND BY
THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.

THIS DEED IS BEING RECORDED TO PERFECT THE TITLE OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES.

ATTEST:

Brenda Green, City Clerk of the John Stephens, Mayor of the City City of Costa Mesa of Costa Mesa
Dated: Dated:
61 62
63 CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-394 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
TITLE:

APPROVAL OF A SUMMARY VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 405 EAST 19TH STREET
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION PRESENTED BY: RAJA SETHURAMAN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
CONTACT INFORMATION: SEUNG YANG, P.E., CITY ENGINEER (714) 754-5335 RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution 2026-xx ordering the summary vacation of a portion of right-of-way at 405 East 19th Street.

2. Authorize execution of the Quitclaim Deed by the Mayor and the City Clerk.

BACKGROUND:

At the request of the property owner, Public Works staff has reviewed a request to vacate excess right-of-way at 405 East 19th Street (Attachment 1).

Previous City and County Master Plans of Highways designated East 19th Street as a 4-lane highway; however, the Master Plan designation of the street was downgraded to a 2-lane collector street. As a result, the previously dedicated right-of-way required to construct a 4-lane highway is no longer required. Presently, East 19th Street has been constructed to fulfill the current Master Plan and Streets and Highways capacity requirements.

ANALYSIS:

In accordance with the prior Master Plan in 1972, 20.00-by-59.40-foot of right-of-way along East 19th Street was dedicated by Tract Map 7722, as shown and filed in Book 299, Pages 20 and 21. East 19th Street at this location was not improved to the full dedication width, and was subsequently downgraded to a collector street, creating excess right-of-way.

Currently, there are no utilities within this portion of the public right-of-way and therefore, a reservation for a utility easement is not required. The Engineering and Transportation Services Divisions, as well as the Active Transportation Committee (ATC) have reviewed the excess right-of- way. It was determined that East 19th Street is classified as a Class III bicycle facility, and consequently additional right-of-way is not required for any motorist and/or non-motorist usage.

Page 1 of 3 ends

64 File #: 26-394 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
Attachment 2 shows a typical street cross section of East 19th Street as a Class III bicycle facility.

1. The road has not been used by the public for at least five (5) years.

2. No utilities are constructed within the road.

3. Only one property ownership is affected.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City may retain the excess right-of-way and continue to be responsible for its maintenance and safety. However, this portion of right-of-way is not necessary for any public or utility purposes and is not needed for any motorist and non-motorist public usage now or in the future.

FISCAL REVIEW:

Upon vacation, the area becomes taxable square footage, resulting in additional property taxes to the adjacent property owner to whom the land will revert. Based on this assessment, it is estimated that the County property tax for the vacated parcel would be assessed at $300 to $400 more than the existing parcel. The City’sshare of property tax assessed by the County is $0.15 for every dollar collected. The approval of this item would have an estimated net positive impact of between $45 to $60 annually to the City in the General Fund (Fund 101).

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney’sOffice has reviewed and approved this Report and the attached Resolution as to form.

Page 2 of 3 ends

65 File #: 26-394 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This project supports the following City Council goal:
· Diversify, Stabilize and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution 2026-xx ordering the summary vacation of a portion of right-of-way at 405 East 19th Street.

2. Authorize execution of the Quitclaim Deed by the Mayor and the City Clerk.

Page 3 of 3 ends

66 = PROPOSED AREA TO BE VACATED
405 E. 19th Street
ATTACHMENT 1
67 EXIST
R/W

8.0' PARKING LANE4-----ll--

10.0' 12.0' 12.0'

30.0' 30.0'

40.0'

60.0'
CLASS Ill (BLVD.)

CROSS SECTION
EXIST.

R/W
i--++-+8.0' PARKING LANE

10.0'
ATTACHMENT 2
68 RESOLUTION NO. PC-2026-16

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA FINDING THAT THE

VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY BY THE CITY OF
COSTA MESA ADJACENT TO 296 EAST I9TH STREET IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY OF COSTA MESA 2015-
2035 GENERAL PLAN

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the Costa Mesa City Council adopted the City of Costa Mesa 2015- 2035 General Plan (General Plan) on June 21, 2016; WHEREAS, the Government Code of the State of California, Section 65402, provides in part that a local agency shall not acquire or lease real property nor abandon or dispose of any real property, nor construct a public building or structure in any county or city, until the location, purpose, and extent of such activity has been reported upon as to conformity with the adopted General Plan applicable thereto; WHEREAS, the California Streets and Highways Code, Chapter 4, Section 8334(a) authorizes the legislative body of a local agency to summarily vacate excess street or highway right of way that is not required for street or highway purposes; WHEREAS, the proposed right-of-way vacation has been reviewed by the Engineering and Transportation Services Divisions, and it has been determined that this portion of East I 9th Street is not necessary for public street and highway purposes; WHEREAS, the subject right-of-way is located to the west of the intersection of East 1 9th Street and Santa Ana Avenue;
WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa proposes to vacate a portion of the East 19th Street right-of-way adjacent to the property at 405 East I 9th Street; WHEREAS, even with the requested vacation, the remaining right-of-way on East 19th Street would still provide a 60-foot right-of-way, including a 10-foot public parkway, consistent with the City's Master Plan of Highways, which designates this portion of East 19th Street as a Collector Arterial (two-lanes with no median and a 60-foot total right-of- way);
ATTACHMENT 3
69 WHEREAS, the property at 296 East 19th Street abutting the subject right-of-way will revert back to the owner of 296 East 19th Street and is designated as Low Density Residential by the City General Plan;
WHEREAS, the excess right-of-way being vacated has been found by the Engineering and Transportation Divisions to be unnecessary for any present or future motorist and non-motorist use, and as such, the vacation serves the public interest and is a public benefit as it eliminates any maintenance costs and liabilities imposed on the City associated with the excess right-of-way;
WHEREAS, The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental procedures, and has been found to be exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3) (General Rule), in that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed vacation will have a significant effect on the environment; WHEREAS, the CEQA determination reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis;
WHEREAS, the subject property is shown in Attachment 2 to the Planning Commission staff report (City Engineer's Memo) dated June 8, 2026; WHEREAS, on July 13, 2026, the Costa Mesa Planning Commission reviewed the proposed street vacation and General Plan conformance findings.

Jeffr rlan Chair
Costa Mesa Planning Commission
71 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )ss

AYES: Harlan, Zich, Andrade, Klepack, Martinez, Rojas NOES: None
ABSENT: Dickson
ABSTAIN: None
Carricretary
Costa Mesa Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC-2026-16
72 3DNVH0 lrJ AlNnr):)
92 aavri gz> wxig
dV/'l S,HC1SS3SS!f
531:)Hl:1 Ni NMOHS
SH39/VnN 13:)HVd
!" )4:)C11E1 S,H[JSS3SS!t - 310N
k!-E16 'Nod
ir-iz nn
9r-12 '?t'fil
6E-1 Z 'fl "W
tg-* "/VW
dVW 13:)HVd
9ZEi 'ON lml
Ill 'ON l:lVHl
191 '(JN lml
SIH!it 3H 1 HO&i3N
6164 H:)HVN
3nN-1AV
.+l yi
fit
5aart
(m,
.allL-
.iiaal.ii'a
122
it . gnffi
i
i' @
yl
-F-in'i+,l?
@
OX
@
q
,81
"Jt 'l .ar
e
:;
S,
(/'),
m:5
m
.W
gza, # .ll'lll
X Q
t! (Z!j *z
&
I
z
t @ .. -'?, 01, [2
ooi zz
f JIZ!/ ,
@ %
%E .j-as# s,:igl
I.vl
n
?tty m atl
6 OS 12' @ t
.zp'zirz jl
'(g
g jl;lXr
@ a 0g N a@ s
4PV1/
91 - (= (,
'i: @ = Ol 61
.J#'llT
@ '-
I 4rlil
, (5) "Gl
@,
j'#
-" @ §g a
#J
- 0 (,
, j ..ii+- 'Jar
), @ '
0 kl
G (61) i- 8
, @ \e
jl
o
" (g) z
g(3,0 :i 8
0, rl
Y
.il
k ,4
nl'
('}{i 0, 51
m
.tl
@ s
, 0, XI @ & , 6 0, !9101 0. ,
s 11si
@(Zl @ - OX kl " @ s
.:=. U, 0=:
(!'
' @ %,,,.,, i:ffHl' K O " II @ g,,,.,,, IJVHI"
"4 71 j ' nAl )- .et I .01
, 61 l
ri g
21 6 ')
'1 - (Z (l . Jy, rq
hi rq
m, ,lTh: 0t 71 01 @ gel %1a .tssry lit Jl'llt D Rl " '= 3nN3A V K i
L
J * vw mvsl
C:i rs I r. " I "
m ! (6) (2/
f$f/
%l 1" m
jHO&3N
02(R HDSS3SSY AlNn(13 lHllklJdO:l
(13AH3S3H SlHOld nV
a3:lnmH:IM 3E1 (n ION aS3Sn H3H10 Jmj
Ali1rEIVll mV SMnS!,V dON A:lVHn:l:IV !fj
ajlNO S3SOdHrW M3(1 kKm3SSV AlNnO:l
31NV)40 H(34 0:*lVd3&l SVM elV!l SIHI
v +iqiqx-i
73 Exhibit B
296 E. 19th STREET
= PROPOSED AREA TO BE VACATED
74 ATTACHMENT 4
Resolution No. 2026-xx Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-xx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF EAST 19TH STREET AT 405 EAST 19TH STREET

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY FIND AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the property owners of 405 East 19th Street have requested that the City of Costa Mesa (“City”) vacate a portion of the East 19th Street right -of-way located adjacent to the property at 405 East 19th Street; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to vacate a port ion of the East 19th Street right -of- way located adjacent to the property at 405 East 19th Street, as more particularly described in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, hereafter referred to as the “area to be vacated”; and
WHEREAS, Section 8334(a) of the California Streets and Highways Code allows a local agency to summarily vacate an excess right -of-way of a street or highway not required for street or highway purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported to the City Council that the area to be vacated is excess right-of-way not required for street or highway purposes; and WHEREAS, there are no public utilities located in the area to be vacated; and WHEREAS, on May 13, 2026, the Active Transportation Co mmittee reviewed the vacation request and unanimously approved it; and
WHEREAS, on July 13, 2026, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.

PC-26-16, finding that the proposed vacation of a portion of the East 19th Street right-of- way adjacent to the property located at 405 East 19th Street is consistent with the City’s General Plan, serves the public interest, and is a public benefit.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

Section 1. The City Co uncil of the City of Costa Mesa does hereby declare its intention to vacate a portion of the East 19 th Street right-of-way located adjacent to the property at 405 East 19th Street, as more particularly described in Exhibits A and B. The original 1972 dedication is in excess of the final alignment of East 19th Street, which was 75 ATTACHMENT 4
Resolution No. 2026-xx Page 2 of 3
amended in 2005. The purpose of this vacation is based on a review of the current and future needs of the City and to vacate the excess land to the underlying fee owner.

Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 2026.

John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

___________________________________ ________________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

76 ATTACHMENT 4
Resolution No. 2026-xx Page 3 of 3
THIS PAGE IS RESERVED FOR THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 16h day of September, 2026.

___________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

77 Recording Requested by CITY OF COSTA MESA
When Recorded Mail to:

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Attention - City Clerk
P.O. BOX 1200
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92628-1200
ATTACHMENT 5
Mail Tax Statements to:

Owner (s) of Record
Deed No.: 4060 APN: 117-341-50
TCA: 15-007
Location: 405 E. 19TH STREET Exempt Recording Requested per Government Code 27383

QUITCLAIM DEED
(AS TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENT RIGHTS)
THE UNDERSIGNED DECLARE(S) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS NONE.

Bolar, Trustees of The Colin P. Calvert and Kelley A. Bolar Family Trust, the following described real property , in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California:

SEE RESOLUTION NO.2 6-xx , RECORDED
AS INSTRUMENT NO. OF OFFICIAL

RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER,

ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ATTACHED HERETO AND BY
THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.

THIS DEED IS BEING RECORDED TO PERFECT THE TITLE OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES.

ATTEST:

Brenda Green, City Clerk of the John Stephens, Mayor of the City City of Costa Mesa of Costa Mesa
Dated: Dated:
78 79
80 CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-395 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
TITLE:

ACCEPTANCE AND ALLOCATION OF THE 2026-27 OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT FOR

THE SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT: POLICE DEPARTMENT
PRESENTED BY: DANIEL HOLL, SERGEANT
CONTACT INFORMATION: DANIEL HOLL (714) 754-5395
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

2. Authorize an appropriation to revenue and expenditure in the amount of $275,500 for the 2026 -27 OTS STEP Grant in the Office of Traffic Safety Fund (Fund 220).

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the grant documents, including the Grant Agreement, and accept and administer the grant.

BACKGROUND:

The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration channels federal funding to California by way of the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). That office’smission is to administer traffic safety grants effectively so that innovative programs can be delivered and traffic fatalities and injuries on California roadways can be eliminated. Grants serve to address deficiencies in existing traffic-safety programs, to expand programs already underway, or to create entirely new ones. The funding may not be used to replace current program expenditures, nor may it be used to support routine maintenance, research, rehabilitation, or construction.

In past years, the Costa Mesa Police Department has received comparable OTS grants. Those awards have materially advanced the goals of the Traffic Safety Bureau and strengthened traffic safety for both residents and visitors. Since 2005, the Office of Traffic Safety has provided the Department with twenty (20) traffic-safety-related grants. The OTS grant funds covered the purchase of specialized equipment and the personnel costs of traffic safety operations. In every grant year, the

Page 1 of 4 ends

81 File #: 26-395 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
Traffic Safety Bureau met its operational objectives.

The City encourages a healthy, active lifestyle and supports sustainable transportation choices, making safety for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians a central priority. OTS grants help the Department address these priorities. The Traffic Safety Bureau places strong emphasis on public- awareness campaigns and community events that highlight the importance of mutual respect among all road users. Through these efforts, Costa Mesa strives to create streets that are safer and more pleasant for everyone who lives or visits the City.

ANALYSIS:

The Office of Traffic Safety compiles collision data rankings according to city population size. Its most recent statistics cover 2023, when Costa Mesa was grouped with 62 other cities in the 100,001- 250,000 population range. In 2023, the City placed 10th for total injury crashes. Because a ranking of 1 indicates the highest number of injury crashes within the comparison group, a 10th-place finish shows Costa Mesa in the top 15 percent among peer cities for total number of injury crashes.

The OTS STEP grant provides funding for enforcement, focusing on the violations that most often cause collisions, with the overarching goal of improving safety for every roadway user. Impaired- driving enforcement has long been a top priority for the Police Department, and the OTS rankings reflect that commitment. In 2023, Costa Mesa ranked first among the 62 cities in its population group for DUI arrests, recording 791 arrests-more than any other jurisdiction.

Historically, the Department maintained a full-time impaired-driving enforcement team with two officers dedicated to roadway safety. Staffing shortages later forced the suspension of that team.

Increased staffing levels allowed the full-time DUI team to resume operations in September 2025.

Each year, OTS grant funds further bolster these efforts by covering the costs for DUI patrols conducted on overtime.

Since the 2014 introduction of driving-under-the-influence-of-drugs laws, the Department has used grant resources to train new officers to enforce these complex statutes. The same grant also underwrites DUI checkpoints. These highly visible operations serve both educational and deterrent purposes, yet they require substantial personnel and are therefore costly. Without grant support, the Department’s capacity to conduct enforcement operations and checkpoints would be severely constrained.

The Police Department has applied and received tentative approval for the 2026-27 OTS STEP Grant. This funding will enable the department to carry out a Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) that takes a comprehensive approach to reducing violations most frequently linked to collisions, while maintaining a clear focus on impaired drivers and those who are suspended or unlicensed. Grant funds will staff sobriety and driver-license checkpoints, support traffic safety enforcement details, purchase related operational equipment, and fund additional training in DUI investigation and enforcement techniques.

Public education is an explicit priority of the grant. The department will raise awareness through press releases, social-media outreach, and highly visible operations, and it must deliver a minimum of three (3) community presentations covering bicycle and pedestrian safety, seat-belt use, distracted driving, and child-passenger safety. By combining public education, advanced officer training, and high-visibility enforcement, the program advances the department’score objective of reducing injury

Page 2 of 4 ends

82 File #: 26-395 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
collisions and saving lives.

The current grant expires on September 30, 2026. The 2026-27 award will allow the Department to build on results already achieved and to pursue new traffic-safety objectives across the City. The additional resources will strengthen efforts against impaired driving and support enforcement of the traffic laws most critical to protecting lives. Specific objectives include DUI saturation patrols, enforcement targeting red-light and excessive-speed violations, distracted-driving enforcement, operations at high-collision intersections, and sobriety/driver-license checkpoints.

Currently, there are 19 objectives outlined in the OTS grant agreement. A few of those specific project objectives include:
· Conduct three (3) Traffic Safety educational presentations with an effort to reach community members. Note: Presentations may include topics such as distracted driving, DUI, speed, bicycle and pedestrian safety, seat belts, and child passenger safety. · Participate in National Pedestrian Safety Month, National Walk to School Day, National Teen Driver Safety Week, National Bicycle Safety Month, and several other national campaigns related to driving awareness.
· Conduct 25 DUI saturation patrols.
· Conduct four (4) special traffic safety enforcement operations targeting red light, excessive speed, and other violations at or near intersections with a disproportionate number of traffic collisions.
· Conduct four (4) special enforcement operations targeting distracted driving violations. · Conduct two (2) special traffic safety enforcement operations in areas or during events with a high number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes.
· Conduct four (4) DUI/DL checkpoints.
· Participate in four (4) highly visible collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations. · Provide advanced officer training in DUI enforcement to 9 officers.

OTS grant funding is based on the federal fiscal year, which runs from October 1, 2026, to September 30, 2027. The Grant Agreement allocates $275,500, which will be utilized over the federal fiscal year, a 12-month period. OTS will reimburse the City for approved grant expenditures throughout the grant period.

Although the majority of the OTS STEP grant is designed to support enforcement efforts to reduce injury-causing traffic collisions, the Traffic Safety Bureau recognizes that only through enforcement and education can we fully realize this goal.

Therefore, in addition to the grant educational requirements, the Traffic Safety Bureau will continue to pursue additional educational efforts to improve roadway safety unrelated to this grant, including collaborating on a city service agreement to provide bicycle safety programming for students and the community at all Newport Mesa Unified School District schools in Costa Mesa.

The Traffic Safety Bureau is committed to collaborating with the community for educational purposes

Page 3 of 4 ends

83 File #: 26-395 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
The Traffic Safety Bureau is committed to collaborating with the community for educational purposes related to bicycle and pedestrian safety. The Traffic Safety Bureau will continue to work collaboratively with the City’sTransportation Services Office to identify hazards that can be mitigated through environmental design. Additionally, City departments will continue to promote traffic safety education utilizing public service announcements and social media.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may elect not to accept the grant; however, the Department would be unable to pursue the specific goals outlined in the report.

FISCAL REVIEW:

Upon acceptance of the 2026-27 OTS STEP Grant, an appropriation in both revenue and expenditure in the amount of $275,500 will be established in the Office of Traffic Safety Fund (Fund 220) for the grant period October 1, 2026, to September 30, 2027.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney’sOffice has reviewed the 2026 OTS STEP Grant Agreement, proposed resolution, and this report and has approved them as to form.

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item supports the City Council Goal:
· Strengthen the public’s safety and improve the quality of life.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

2. Authorize an appropriation to revenue and expenditure in the amount of $275,500 for the 2026 -27 OTS STEP Grant in the Office of Traffic Safety Fund (Fund 220).

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the grant documents, including the Grant Agreement, and accept and administer the grant.

Page 4 of 4 ends

84 Resolution No. 2026-xx Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX
A RE

SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,

CALIFORNIA, RATIFYING THE APPLICATION FOR A GRANT AWARD FROM THE

CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) FOR THE SELECTIVE TRAFFIC

ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (STEP) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR

HER DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL GRANT DOCUMENTS, AND ACCEPT AND

ADMINISTER THE GRANT
T

HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) has established the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant with the objective of reducing the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary collision factors; and
WHEREAS, OTS has allocated the City of Costa Mesa $275,500 in grant funds for the period of October 1, 2025, through September 30, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa supports the Program goals and wishes to participate in the Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Manager or her designee to execute all grant documents and accept and administer the grant.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

S ection 1. That the recitals contained in this Resolution are true and correct and incorporated herein.

Section 2. The City Council hereby ratifies the application for a STEP grant from the Office of California Traffic Safety and approves revenue and expense appropriations in the amount of $275,500 for the 2026-27 OTS STEP Grant.

Section 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or her designee to execute all grant documents, including the grant agreement, accept and administer the grant, and take all steps necessary to implement this authorization and STEP requirements and objectives.

Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to t he passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall enter it into the book of original resolutions.

ATTACHMENT 1
85 Resolution No. 2026-xx Page 2 of 3

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of _________, 2026.

_____________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________ _____________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

86 Resolution No. 2026-xx Page 3 of 3

THIS PAGE IS RESERVED FOR THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2026- xx and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the __ day of ________, 2026, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this ___ day of _______, 2026.

___________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

87 State of California - Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT

GRANT NUMBER
PT27039

1. GRANT TITLE
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

2. NAME OF AGENCY
Costa Mesa

3. Grant Period
From: 10/01/2026
To: 09/30/20274. AGENCY UNIT TO ADMINISTER GRANT
Costa Mesa Police Department

5. GRANT DESCRIPTION
Best practice strategies will be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors. The funded strategies may include impaired driving enforcement, enforcement operations focusing on primary crash factors, distracted driving, night-time seat belt enforcement, special enforcement operations encouraging motorcycle safety, enforcement and public awareness in areas with a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes, and educational programs. These strategies are designed to earn media attention thus enhancing the overall deterrent effect. In addition, the department will participate in community collaboration and engagement activities to engage in conversations regarding traffic safety with community members.

6. Federal Funds Allocated Under This Agreement Shall Not Exceed: $275,600.00 Allocation is contingent upon availability of federal funds.

7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement:
@ Schedule A - Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives and Method of Procedure * Schedule B - Detailed Budget Estimate and Sub-Budget Estimate (if applicable) * Schedule B-1 - Budget Narrative and Sub-Budget Narrative (if applicable) * Exhibit A - Certifications and Assurances
* Exhibit B" - OTS Grant Program Manual
* Exhibit C - Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access "The item shown with an asterisk ("), is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto. This document can be viewed at the OTS home web page under Grants: www.ots.ca.gov.

Use of OTS Grant Agreement template in lieu of the California Model Agreement (CMA) The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) utilizes its standardized OTS Grant Agreement template for awards. The format, structure, and uniformity of the OTS Grant Agreement template allows for processing through Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS). OTS's approach to using the OTS Grant Agreement template is consistent with the California Model Agreement (CMA) developed by University of California Office of the President (UCOP) and directed by the Department of General Service (DGS). For more information, please review the OTS Grant Program Manual.

Pre-Agreement Work
No work shall commence and no costs shall be incurred prior to the grant start date or the grant agreement being fully signed and executed. Any such costs are incurred at the grantee's own risk and may not be reimbursed. 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 1 of 23
ATTACHMENT 2
88 8. Approval Signatures
We, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we are duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the grant terms and conditions described herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.

A. GRANT DIRECTOR
NAMEI Daniel Holl
TITLE: Sergeant
EMAILI [email protected]
PHONE: (T14) 754-5395
ADDRESSI 99 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
NAME: Cecilia Gallardo Daly
TITLE: City Manager
EMAIL: [email protected]
PHONE: (T14) 754-5099
ADDRESS: 99 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
(Signature) (Date)
C. FISCAL OFFICIAL
NAMEI Mark Khou
TITLEI Interim Finance director
EMAIL: [email protected]
PHONEI (714) 754-5241
AoDRESS: 99 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
(Signature) (Date)
D. AUTHORIZINGOFFICIALOFOFFICEOFTRAFFICSAFETY
NAMEI Stephanie Dougherky
TITLE: Director
EMAIL: [email protected]
PHONE: (916) 509-3030
AoDRESS: 2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758
(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
E. ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC Sqren
NAMEI Mary Khang
Aoot<ess: 2208 Kausen Drive Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95758

9. SAM INFORMATION
SAM #: VLGSY JVFJ4M7

REGISTERED
ADDRESS: 77 Fair Drive
Ci'ry: Costa Mesa
Zip+4: 92626-6520
8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 2 of 23
89 10. PROJECTED EXPENDITURES
FUND CFDA ITEM/APPROPRIATION F.Y. CHAPTER STATUTE PROJECTED

EXPENDITURES
405c TR-27 20.616 0521-0890-101 2026 19/26 BA/26 $6,000.00 1906-27 20.611 0521-0890-101 2026 19/26 BA/26 $16,500.00 405e DDA- 20.616 0521-0890-101 2026 19/26 BA/26 $18,000.00 402PT-27 20.600 0521-0890-101 2026 19/26 BA/26 $50,000.00 1641D-27 20.608 0521-0890-101 2026 I9/26 BA/26 $185,000.00

AGREEMENT
TOTAL $275,500.00

AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY THIS DOCUMENT
$275,500.00ICERTIFY upon my own personal knowledge that the budgeted funds for the current budget year are available for the period and purpose of the expenditure stated above, notwithstanding allocations contingent on availability of federat funds.

PRIOR AMOUNT ENCUMBERED FOR THIS

AGREEMENT
$ 0.00

OTS ACCOUNTING OFFICER'S SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED TOTAL AMOUNT ENCUMBERED TO DATE $275,500.00
8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 3 of 23
90 State of California - Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule A

GRANT NUMBER
PT27039

1. PROBLEMSTATEMENT
Describe the city, county, or jurisdiction this grant will impact.

Costa Mesa is located 37 miles south of Los Angeles in southern California. Costa Mesa encompasses a total of 16 square miles and has a population of approximately 109,000 (US Census 2023). 8tate Highway 55 has its southern terminus, and State Highway 73 has its northern terminus within Costa Mesa. Interstate 405 also runs directly through the middle of the city. Costa Mesa is also located one mile from the Pacific Ocean. Costa Mesa has a large tourist industry centering on the nearby beach and coastal area, the Orange County Fairgrounds, South Coast Plaza mall, and the Segerstrom Center for the Arts. There are hundreds of thousands of commuters daily during the summer months.

The City's location provides easy access to many of Southern California's major attractions, including beaches, mountain areas, high and low deserts, Disneyland, Knott's Berry Farm, Palm Springs and Los Angeles. Due to the increase in numbers of both locals and visitors, high traffic density in parts of Costa Mesa increases the risk of crashes. Pedestrians and cyclists are particularly vulnerable in busy corridors.

Limited traffic control measures in some neighborhoods contribute to unsafe conditions. We are committed to suppofing everyone using our roadways.

Describe the problem(s) to be addressed, supported by current and relevant crash data. (most recent calendar year data/stats).

Traffic Enforcement Staffing:

The Costa Mesa Police Department's Traffic Safety Bureau is staffed with ten officers with two on workplace injuries. Full staffing for the Traffic Safety Bureau is budgeted for ten full-time officers, responsible for enforcing traffic laws across the entire city, including a full-time, two-person DUI team. In January 2026, the Costa Mesa Police Department anticipates staffing at ten full-time officers. While the department provides traffic enforcement coverage seven days a week, the limited number of officers results in minimal daily staffing. Traffic officers must also divide their time between critical duties, including crash investigations and other pressing law enforcement responsibilities, leaving little capacity for proactive traffic enforcement. The Costa Mesa Police Department reintroduced a full-time DUI team late last year for directed enforcement of impaired drivers.

Speeding continues to be a significant traffic safety concern in Costa Mesa; from 2023 to 2025, the Department responded to 597 traffic crashes resulting in 228 injuries and three fatalities. During the same period, officers issued 3,985 citations for unsafe speed, and unsafe speed has remained the number one primary crash factor for the past three years. The Traffic Safety Bureau currently has one Sergeant and three dedicated officers assigned to traffic enforcement in patrol vehicles. These officers have expressed a desire to conduct traffic enforcement using motorcycles; however, the Police Department would need to expand its motorcycle fleet to accommodate this operational need. Adding an additional motorcycle will enhance the Department's ability to conduct routine traffic enforcement and improve the effectiveness of efforts to combat unsafe speeding violations.

DUI Enforcement:

Costa Mesa has historically been impacted by DUI traffic crashes due to numerous ABC establishments located within the city boundaries, a highly traveled freeway terminating in our city, and our roadways being used to access nearby tourist cities such as Huntington Beach and Newport Beach. To mitigate driving under the influence cases in Costa Mesa, a combination of prevention, enforcement, and education is crucial. Strengthening partnerships with local businesses, increasing DUI saturation patrols, and continuing public outreach efforts can help reduce the frequency and impact of DUI incidents. The Traffic Safety Bureau had a year-round, two-person DUI enforcement team in 2021 and 2022. During that time there were 1093 DUI arrests in 2021 and 941 DUI arrests in 2022. Due to loss of personnel, the DUI enforcement team was sus ed in October 2023, and there were on 851 DUI arrests d rtment-wide that ear. The 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 4 of 23
91 Traffic Safety Bureau could not staff a full-time DUI enforcement team in 2024, and DUI arrests dropped to 518 that year. From January 2025 to September 2025, we had a total of 426 DUI arrests. In September 2025, we reintroduced a DUI team. From September 2025 to December 2025, we had 312 DUI arrests displaying a DUI team is successful in preventing injury traffic crashes due to impaired driving.

Distracted Drivers:

Driving while using a cell phone is extremely dangerous and poses a significant risk to drivers, passengers, pedestrians, bicyclists, and other roadway users. Looking at a phone screen takes your eyes off the road, increasing the likelihood of being involved in a crash. Holding or manipulating a phone reduces your ability to perceive and react to changing road conditions. Distracted drivers are more likely to run red lights, drift out of their lane, or fail to stop in time, leading to crashes. Distraction-related crashes are often more severe because drivers fail to react in time to reduce impact. Costa Mesa had 38 crashes in 2025 where drivers admitted being using their phones at the time of the crash. Drivers using their cellphones while driving continues to be a problem in Costa Mesa. There were 2701 citations issued in Costa Mesa in 2025 to drivers who were using their cell phones while driving.

Pedestrians and Bicyclists:

In 2024, four pedestrians tragically lost their lives, and 59 others were injured in Costa Mesa crashes.

Through enforcement efforts, in 2025, there were no pedestrian fatalities, and 48 others were injured in Costa Mesa. Continuing in 2025, there was one bicyclist fatality, and 94 bicyclists sustained injuries in crashes. Pedestrian travel, including the use of bicycles and electric bicycles and scooters, continues to grow in popularity throughout the city, with many school-aged students relying on electric bicycles as their primary mode of transportation to and from school. The Costa Mesa Police Department is dedicated to enhancing public awareness through community traffic safety education programs. These initiatives and bicycle safety workshops play a crucial role in educating the Costa Mesa community about potential street hazards and provide essential safety tips to vulnerable roadway users. While the exact number of lives impacted is difficult to quantify, these programs positively influence every participant. Despite challenges in measuring overall effectiveness, they consistently receive strong community support and active participation, making them a valuable and indispensable asset to the department.

Street Racing/Sideshows:

Costa Mesa stands out for its strong community involvement in policing, focusing on identifying and solving problems collaboratively. By maintaining ongoing partnerships with businesses, residents, community stakeholders, and the general public, the police department gains valuable insights into the community's diverse concerns. This proactive approach has helped spotlight emerging criminal trends such as street racing and sideshows, which have become significant issues on Orange County streets. Street racing, sideshows, and drag racing have become growing concerns in Orange County, with a significant rise in incidents since the pandemic in 2020. The illegal activities, occurring multiple times a week, pose serious risks to public safety and often result in property damage to the local roadways. Funding allows the department's partnership for countywide street racing enforcement. It has enabled increased collaboration with neighboring agencies, enhancing Costa Mesa's Street racing enforcement capabilities. These collaborative efforts have proven highly effective by allowing agencies to share resources and knowledge resulting in more efficient and impactfu! outcomes.

Define the target population the grant intends to serve and how they are affected by the problem(s).

The population in Costa Mesa affected by traffic issues is diverse and includes various groups within the community, such as families and students, commuters, business owners and patrons, pedestrians and cyclists, and others in the general public. Parents and students commuting to schools in the Newport-Mesa Unified School District face increased risks from congestion, speeding, and pedestrian safety concerns near school campuses. The growing use of electric bikes and scooters, particularly among school-aged children, exposes this group to safety risks due to inadequate infrastructure and driver inattention. Many residents commute within Costa Mesa or to neighboring cities for work, relying heavily on cars due to limited public trans 'on. Con ' n on ma'or roads and freewa like the 55, 405, and 73 creates dela and 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 5 of 23
92 frustration. Non-residents traveling through Costa Mesa for work or leisure also contribute to and are impacted by traffic issues.

Costa Mesa Police Department is committed to proactively working to create the safest possible driving experience for our residents, commuters and visitors. Our goal is to work diligently by conducting high visibility enforcements, providing education, and engaging in community collaboration and engagement events to help reduce traffic crashes and fatalities and keep everyone driving on our roadways safe.

2. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
A. Goals:

1. Reduce the number of persons killed in traffic crashes.

2. Reduce the number of persons injured in traffic crashes.

3. Reduce the number of pedestrians killed in traffic crashes.

4. Reduce the number of pedestrians injured in traffic crashes.

5. Reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic crashes.

6. Reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic crashes.

7. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol-involved crashes.

8. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol-involved crashes.

9. Reduce the number of persons killed in drug-involved crashes.

10. Reduce the number of persons injured in drug-involved crashes.

11. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

12. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

13. Reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in traffic crashes.

14. Reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in traffic crashes.

15. Reduce hit & run fatal crashes.

16. Reduce hit & run injury crashes.

17. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) fatal crashes.

18. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) injury crashes.

B. Objectives:

1. Issue a news release announcing the kick-off of the grant by December 31st. The kick-off news releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed to the OTS Public Information Officer at [email protected], and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 7 days prior to the issuance date of the release.

Target Number
1 2. Participate and report data (as required) in the following campaigns; Quarter 1 :

National Pedestrian Safety Month, National Walk to School Day, National Teen Driver Safety Week, NHTSA Winter Mobilization; Quarter 3: National Distracted Driving Awareness Month, National Motorcycle Safety Month, National Bicycle Safety Month, National Click it or Ticket Mobilization; Quarter 4: National Speed Prevention Campaigns, NHTSA Summer Mobilization, National Child Passenger Safety Week, and California's Pedestrian Safety Month. 12 3. Develop (by December 31) and/or maintain a "DUI BOLO" program to notify patrol and traffic officers to be on the lookout for identified repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. Updated DUI BOLOs should be distributed to patrol and traffic officers monthly. Report on the outcomes of the "DUI BOLO" program.
12 4. Send law enforcement-personnel to the NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) (minimum 16 hours) POST-certified training. 4 5. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Advanced -Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) 16 hour POST-certified training. 5 6. Send law enforcement personnel to the Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training (classroom and field training must be completed).
1 7. Conduct DUI/DL Checkpoints. A minimum of 1 checkpoint should be conducted during the NHTSA Winter Mobilization and 1 during the Summer Mobilization. To enhance the overall deterrent effect and promote high visibility, it is recommended the grantee issue an advance press release and conduct social media activity for 4 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 6 of 23
93 each checkpoint. For combination DUI/DL checkpoints, departments should issue press releases that mention DL's will be checked at the DUI/DL checkpoint. Signs for DUI/DL checkpoints should read "DUI/Driver's License Checkpoint Ahead." OTS does not fund or support independent DL checkpoints. Only on an exception basis and with OTS pre-approval will OTS fund checkpoints that begin prior to 1800 hours. When possible, DUI/DL Checkpoint screeners should be DRE- or ARI DE-trained.

8. Conduct DUI Saturation Patrol operation(s). 25

9. Conduct Traffic Enforcement operation(s), including but not limited to, primary crash factor violations.
4 10. Conduct highly publicized Distracted Driving enforcement operation(s) targeting drivers using hand held cell phones and texting.
4 11. Conduct hig-hly publicized Motorcycle Safety e-nforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of motorcycle incidents or crashes resulting from unsafe speed, DUI, following too closely, unsafe lane changes, improper turning, and other primary crash factor violations by motorcyclists and other drivers. 2 12. Conduct highly publicized pedestrian and/or bicycle enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes resulting from violations made by pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. 2 13. Conduct Traffic Safety educational presentation(s) with an effort to reach community members. Note: Presentation(s) may include topics such as distracted driving, DUI, speed, bicycle and pedestrian safety, seat belts and child passenger safety.
3 14. Participate in highly visible collaborative DUI Enforcement operations. 4 4 5. Participate in highly visible collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations. 1

16. Send law enforcement personnel to DUI Checkpoint Planning and Management training.
1 17. Conduct specialized enforcement operations focusing specifically on street racing and sideshow activities.
2 18. Participate in community collaboration and engagement activities to engage in conversations regarding traffic safety to both share information and receive input from the community members.
2 19. Purchase and implement Traffic Stop Data Licenses to collect and report the required RIPA observational data.
140

3. METHOD OF PROCEDURE
A. Phase 1- Program Preparation (lst Quarter of Grant Year) * The department will develop operational plans to implement the "best practice" strategies outlined in the objectives section.
@ Conduct all training needed to implement the program, in the first quarter. * Purchase all grant related supplies and materials to implement the program, in the first quarter. * Items with a unit cost of $5,000 more (including tax and shipping) must comply with the Buy America Act.
* In order to develop/maintain the "DUI BOLOs," research will be conducted to identify repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. The DUI BOLO may include the driver's name, last known address, DOB, description, current license status, and the number of times suspended or revoked for DUI. DUI BOLOs should be updated and distributed to traffic and patrol officers at least monthly. * ImplementationoftheSTEPgrantactivitieswillbeaccomplishedbydeployingpersonnelathigh crash locations.

Media Reauirements
Issue a news release approved by the OTS PIO announcing the kick-off of the grant by December 31 and affer the grant is signed and executed, but no sooner than October 1, the start of the grant year. The kick-off release must be approved by the OTS PIO. If you are unable to meet the December 31 deadline to issue a kick-off press release, communicate the reasons to your OTS grant coordinator and OTS PIO.

B. Phase 2 - Program Operations (Throughout Grant Year) a Requirements - -
8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 7 of 23
94 The following requirements are for all grant-related activities:
@ Send all media advisories, alerts, videos, graphics, artwork, posters, radio/PSA/video scripts, storyboards, digital and/or print educational materials for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days before the scheduled release but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated. * Send all PowerPoint presentations, online presentations and trainings for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at pio($ots.ca.qov for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator. Certified training courses are EXEMPT from the approval process. * The OTS PIO is responsible for the approval of the design and content of materials. The agency understands OTS PIO approval is not authorizing approval of budget expenditure or cost. Any cost approvals must come from the OTS grant coordinator. * Pre-approval is not required when using any OTS-supplied template for media advisories, news releases, social media graphics, videos or posts, or any other OTS-supplied educational material.

However, copy the OTS PIO at pio(Qots.ca.qov and your OTS grant coordinator when any material is distributed to the media and public, such as a news release, educational material, or link to social media post.
* If an OTS-supplied template, educational material, social media graphic, post or video is substantially changed, the changes shall be sent to the OTS PIO at pio($ots.ca.qov for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator.
* News releases, social media posts and alerts on platforms such as NextDoor and Nixle reporting immediate and time-sensitive grant activities (e.g. enforcement operations, day of event highlights or announcements, event invites) are EXEMPT from the OTS PIO approval process.

The OTS PIO and your OTS grant coordinator should still be notified when the grant-related activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).
* Enforcement activities such as warrant and probation sweeps, court stings, etc. that are embargoed or could impact operations by publicizing in advance are EXEMPT from the PIO approval process. However, announcements and results of activities should still be copied to the OTS PIO at pio(o,ots.ca.qov and your OTS grant coordinator with the embargoed date and time or with "INTERNAL ONLY: DO NOT RELEASE" message in subject line of email. * Any earned or paid media campaigns for TV, radio, digital or social media that are part of a specific grant objective, using OTS grant funds, or designed and developed using contractual services by a subgrantee, requires prior approval.
* Social media posts highlighting state or national traffic safety campaigns (Distracted Driving Month, Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month, etc.), enforcement operations (DUI checkpoints etc.), or any other grant-related activity such as Bicycle rodeos, presentations, or events, are highly encouraged but do not require prior approval. * Submit a draft or rough-cut of all digital, printed, recorded or video material (brochures, posters, scripts, arork, trailer graphics, digital graphics, social posts connected to an earned or paid media campaign grant objective) to the OTS PIO at pio(,ots.ca.qov and copy your OTS grant coordinator for approval prior to the production or duplication. * Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials, space permitting:

Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. * Space permitting, include the OTS logo on all grant-funded print materials, graphics and paid or earned social media campaign grant objective; consult the OTS PIO and copy your OTS grant coordinator for specifics, format-appropriate logos, or if space does not permit the use of the OTS logo.
* Email the OTS PIO at pio(a,ots.ca.qov and copy your OTS grant coordinator at least 21 days in advance, or when first confirmed, a short description of any significant grant-related traffic safety event or program, particularly events that are highly publicized beforehand with anticipated media coverage so the OTS has sufficient notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event. If unable to attend, email the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator brief highlights and/or results, including any media coverage (broadcast, digital, print) of the event within 7 a a nificant rant-related event or ram. The OTS PIO and our 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 8 of 23
95 OTS grant coordinator should still be notified in advance when the grant-related activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).
* Any news releases, work plans, scripts, storyboards, arhuork, graphics, videos or any educational or informational materials that received OTS PIO approval in a prior grant year must be resubmitted for approval in the current grant year. * For additional guidance, refer to the OTS Grants Materials Approval Process Guidelines and .
* Email the OTS PIO at [email protected] or your OTS grant coordinator for consultation when changes from any of the above requirements might be warranted.

C. Phase3-DataCollection&Reporting(ThroughoutGrantYear)

1. Prepare and submit grant claim invoices (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)

2. Prepare and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPR) (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)
* Collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of goals and objectives. * Provide a brief list of activity conducted, procurement of grant-funded items, and significant media activities. Include status of grant-funded personnel, status of contracts, challenges, or special accomplishments.
* Provide a brief summary of quarterly accomplishments and explanations for objectives not completed or plans for upcoming activities.
* Collect, analyze and report statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives.

4. METHOD OF EVALUATION
Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the "Final Evaluation" section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary ofthe grant's accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed.

5. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
This program has full administrative support, and every effort will be made to continue the grant activities affer grant conclusion.
8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 9 of 23
96 State of California - Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B

GRANT NUMBER
PT27039

FUND NUMBER CATALOG

NUMBER (CFDA)

FUND DESCRIPTION TOT AL AMOUNT
405c TR-27 20.616 State Traffic Safety Information
System Improvements
$6,000.00
1906-27 20.611 Racial Profiling Prohibition Grants $16,500.00 405e DDA-27 20.616 Distracted Driving Awareness $18,000.00 402PT-27 20.600 State and Community Highway
Safety
$50,000.00
1641D-27 20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat
Offenders for Driving While
Intoxicated
$185,000.00

COST CATEGORY FUND
NUMBER

UNIT COST OR
RATE

UNITS TOTAL COST TO
GRANT
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
Straiqht Time
$0.00
DUI/DL Checkpoints 1641D-27 $14,000.00 4 $56,000.00
DUI Saturation Patrols 1641D-27 $3,000.00 25 $75,000.00 Collaborative DUI Enforcement 1641D-27 $3,800.00 4 $15,200.00 Benefits for 1 641D OT @ 23.82% 1641D-27 $146,200.00 1 $34,825.00 Traffic Enforcement 402PT-27 $3,050.00 4 $12,200.00
Motorcycle Safety Enforcement 402PT-27 $2,700.00 2 $5,400.00 Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement 402PT-27 $3,000.00 2 $6,000.00 Street Racing and Sideshow Enforcement
Operations
402PT-27 $2,800.00 2 $5,600.00
Collaborative Traffic Enforcement 402PT-27 $3,500.00 1 $3,500.00 Traffic Safety Educational Presentations 402PT-27 $1,ooo.oo 3 $3,000.00 Benefits for 402PT OT @ 23.82% 402PT-27 $35,700.00 I $8,504.00 Distracted Driving Enforcement 405e DDA-
27 $3,634.20 4 $14,537.00
Benefits for 405e DDA OT @ 23.82% 405e DDA-
27 $14,537.00 1 $3,463.00
Community Collaboration Engagement 1906-27 $1,009.50 2 $2,O"l9.00 Benefits for 1906 0T @ 23.82% 1906-27 $2,019.00 1 $4E31 .00 Category Sub-Total $245,729.00
B. TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel 402PT-27 $5,796.00 1 $5,796.00
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $5,796.00
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
D. EQUIPMENT
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 10 of 23
97 DUI Checkpoint Supplies 1641D-27 $3,975.00 1 $3,975.00 Handheld Citation Data Collection Devices 405c TR- 27 $857.14 7 $6,000.00
Traffic Stop Data License 1906-27 $100.00 140 $14,000.00 Category Sub-Total $23,975.00
F. INDIRECT COSTS
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
GRANTTOTAL $275,600.00
8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 11 of 23
98 State of California - Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B-1

GRANT NUMBER
PT27039

BUDGET NARRATIVE

PERSONNEL COSTS
DUI/DL Checkpoints - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate depafment personnel.

DUI Saturation Patrols - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative DUI Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative DUI Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Benefits for 1641D OT @ 23.82% - Claimed amounts must reflect actual benefit costs for overtime hours charged to the grant.

Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Motorcycle Safety Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Street Racing and Sideshow Enforcement Operations - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Traffic Safety Educational Presentations - Overtime for grant funded traffic safety educational presentations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Benefits for 402PT OT @ 23.82% - Claimed amounts must reflect actual benefit costs for overtime hours charged to the grant.

Distracted Driving Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Benefits for 405e DDA OT @ 23.82% - Claimed amounts must reflect actual benefit costs for overtime hours charged to the grant.

Community Collaboration Engagement - Overtime for grant funded community collaborative engagement conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Benefits for 1906 0T @ 23.82% - Claimed amounts must reflect actual benefit costs for overtime hours charged to the grant.

TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel - Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supporting the grant goals and objectives and/or traffic safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings is included. Anticipated travel may include the OTS Traffic Safety Law Enforcement Forum, OTS Traffic Safety Summit, GHSA Annual Meeting in Anaheim. All conferences, seminars or training not specifically identified in the Budget Narrative must be approved by OTS. All travel claimed must be at the agency approved rate. Per Diem may not be claimed for meals provided at conferences when registration fees are paid with OTS grant funds.

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES

EQUIPMENT

OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DUI Checkpoint Supplies - On-scene supplies needed to conduct sobriety checkpoints. Costs may include 28" traffic cones, MUTCD compliant traffic signs, MUTCD compliant high visibility vests (maximum of 10), traffic counters (maximum of 2), generator, gas for generators, lighting, reflective banners, electronic flares, PAS Device Supplies, PAS Calibration Supplies, heater, propane for heaters, fan, anti-fatigue mats, and 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 12 of 23
99 lcbaenroeplmiebsu.rAsdeddi.tional items may be purchased if approved by OTS. The cost of food and beverages will not Handheld Citation Data Collection Devices - Handheld devices for traffic officer use to collect citation data, print the citation in the field, and transfer the information electronically to the agency RMS system and to the courts. The system will be used by traffic officers to improve the efficiency and accuracy of writing traffic citations. Costs include the purchase of electronic citation device, with integral mag-strip reader, thermal printer, audio recorder, camera, docking/charging station, software, licenses, accessories, training, and associated shipping and taxes. Costs may not include cell phones.

Traffic Stop Data License - Access to the-RIPA application to collect stop data that will guide officers through the required questions needed to collect observational data. The software has built in conjunction with the California DOJ and several city law enforcements agencies. Costs may include software, licenses, training, accessories, and associated shipping and taxes.

INDIRECT COSTS
Srareuewrs/Disciaiwess
There will be no program income generated from this grant.

Salaries may include wages, salaries, special compensations, or authorized absences such as annual leave and sick leave provided the cost for the individual employee is (a) reasonable for the services rendered, and (b) follows an appointment made in accordance with state or local laws and rules and meets federal requirements.

Any non-grant funded vacancies created by reassignment to a grant-funded position must be filled at the expense of the grantee agency.

Nothing in this agreement shall be interpreted as a requirement, formal or informal, that a particular law enforcement officer issue a specified or predetermined number of citations in pursuance of the goals and objectives here under.

The OTS grant funded activities must be separate from other grant funded program activities and maintained under separate accounting tracking codes (example: the same DUI checkpoint may not be funded by both the CHP Cannabis Tax Fund and the OTS).

Benefits for personnel costs can only be applied to straight time or overtime hours charged to the grant. 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 13 of 23
100
State of California - Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Exhibit A

GRANT NUMBER
PT27039
Appendix A to Part 1300-Certifications and Assurances for Highway Safety Grants (23 u.s.c. Chapter 4 or Section 1906, Public Law 1 09-59, as amended by Section 26024, Public Law 117- 58)
The officials named on the grant agreement, certify by way of signature on the grant agreement signature page, that the Grantee Agency complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives and State rules, guidelines, policies, and laws in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding.

Applicable provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The State will comply with applicable statutes and regulations, including but not limited to:
* 23 u.s.c. Chapter 4-Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended; * Sec. 1906, Public Law 109-59, as amended by Sec. 25024, Public Law 117-58; * 23 CFR part 1300-Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs; * 2 CFR part 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards;
* 2 CFR part 1201-Department of Transportation, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.

NONDISCRIMINATION
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State highway safety agency [and its subrecipients] will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination ("Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities"). These include but are not limited to:
* Title Vl of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 u.s.c. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin);
* 49 CFR part 21 (entitled Non-discrimination in Federa(ly-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation-Effectuation of Title Vl of the Civil Rights Act of'7964); * 28 CFR 50.3 (u.s. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title Vl of the Civil Rights Act of 1964);
* TheUniformRelocationAssistanceandRealPropertyAcquisitionPoliciesActof1970, (42U.S.C.4601), (prohibits unfairtreatment of persons displaced orwhose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects);
* Federal-AidHighwayActof 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 etseq.), and Title IXofthe Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 u.s.c. 1681-'1683 and 1685-1686) (prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex);
* Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 u.s.c. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability) and 49 CFR part 27; * The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 u.s.c. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
* The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1981 (Pub. L. 100-209), (broadens scope, coverage, and applicability of Title Vl of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the
Federal aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally- funded or not);
* Titles // and /// of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 u.s.c. 12131-12189) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places or public accommodation, and certain testing) and 49 CFR parts 37 and 38
8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 14 of 23
101
The preceding statutory and regulatory cites hereinafter are referred to as the "Acts" and "Regulations," respectively.

GENERAL ASSURANCES
In accordance with the Acts, the Regulations, and other pertinent directives, circulars, policy, memoranda, and/or guidance, the Recipient hereby gives assurance that it will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that:
"No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, orbe otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity, for which the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance from DOT, including NHTSA."
The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 clarified the original intent of Congress, with respect to Title Vl of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other non-discrimination requirements (the Age Discrimination Act of I 975, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973), by restoring the broad, institutional-wide scope and coverage of these nondiscrimination statutes and requirements to include all programs and activities of the Recipient, so long as any portion of the program is Federally assisted.

SPECIFIC ASSURANCES
More specifically, and without limiting the above general Assurance, the Recipient agrees with and gives the following Assurances with respect to its Federally assisted Highway Safety Grant Program:

1. TheRecipientagreesthateach"activity,""facility,"or"program,"asdefinedin§21.23(li)and(c)of 49 CFR part 21 will be (with regard to an "activity") facilitated, or will be (with regard to a "facility") operated, or will be (with regard to a "program") conducted in compliance with all requirements imposed by, or pursuant to the Acts and the Regulations.

2. The Recipient will insert the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests For Proposals for work, or material subject to the Acts and the Regulations made in connection with all Highway Safety Grant Programs and, in adapted form, in all proposals for negotiated agreements regardless of funding source:
"The [name of Recipientl, in accordance with the provisions of Title Vl of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies a// bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award."

3. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix A and E of this Assurance (also referred to as DOT order 1 050.2A) [!lin every contract or agreement subject to the Acts and the Regulations.

4. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix B of DOT Order 1 050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a Recipient.

5. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance to construct a facility, or part of a facility, the Assurance will extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith.

6. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance in the form of, or for the acquisition of, real property or an interest in real property, the Assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property.

7. That the Recipient will include the clauses set forth in appendix C and appendix D of this DOT Order 1 050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, licenses, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the Recipient with other parties:
a. for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program; and
b. for the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program.

8. That this Assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 15 of 23
102
form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the Assurance obligates the Recipient, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods:
a. the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or
b. the period during which the Recipient retains ownership or possession of the property.

9. The Recipient will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary of Transportation or the official to whom he/she delegates specific authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub- grantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.

10. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.

By signing this ASSURANCE, the State highway safety agency also agrees to comply (and require any sub- recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, successors, transferees, and/or assignees to comply) with all applicable provisions governing NHTSA's access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff. You also recognize that you must comply with any program or compliance reviews, and/or complaint investigations conducted by NHTSA. You must keep records, reports, and submit the material for review upon request to NHTSA, or its designee in a timely, complete, and accurate way. Additionally, you must comply with all other reporting, data collection, and evaluation requirements, as prescribed by law or detailed in program guidance.

The State highway safety agency gives this ASSURANCE in consideration of and for obtaining any Federal grants, loans, contracts, agreements, property, and/or discounts, or other Federal-aid and Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the recipients by the u.s. Department of Transportation under the Highway Safety Grant Program. This ASSURANCE is binding on the State highway safety agency, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, subcontractors and their subcontractors', transferees, successors in interest, and any other participants in the Highway Safety Grant Program. The person(s) signing below is/are authorized to sign this ASSURANCE on behalf of the Recipient.

THE DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE ACT OF 1988 (41 u.s.c. 8103) The Subgrantee will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace, and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; b. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about:

1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;

2. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;

3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs;

4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations occurring in the workplace;

5. Making it a requirement that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); c. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will -

1. Abide by the terms of the statement;

2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction; d. Notifying the agency within ten days affer receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction; e. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted -

1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination;

2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 16 of 23
103
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
f. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of all of the paragraphs above.

POLITICAL ACTMTY (HATCH ACT)
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 u.s.c. 1501-1508), which limits the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

CERTIFICATION FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;

2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions;

3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, u.s. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

RESTRICTION ON ST ATE LOBBYING
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifica!ly designed to urge or influence a State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., "grassroots") lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRIMARY TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION (STATES) 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 17 of 23
104

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective primary tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.

3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default or may pursue suspension or debarment.

4. The prospective primary tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary tier participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

5. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

6. The prospective primary tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the depafment or agency entering into this transaction.

7. The prospective primary tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification" including the "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transaction," provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart

9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website
( https:flwww.sam.qovtl.

9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate the transaction for cause or default.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS-PRIMARY TIER

COVERED TRANSACTIONS

1. The prospective primary tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 18 of 23
105
its principals:
a. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;
b. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theff, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (l)(b) ofthis certification; and d. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

2. Where the prospective primary tier participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR LOWER TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

4. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.

6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification" including the "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart

8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 19 of 23
106
records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION-LOWER TIER

COVERED TRANSACTIONS

1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal depafment or agency.

2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

BUY AMERICA
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will comply with the Buy America requirement (23 u.s.c. 313) when purchasing items using Federal funds. Buy America requires a State, or subrecipient, to purchase with Federal funds only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States, unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestically produced items would be inconsistent with the public interest, that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality, or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. In order to use Federal funds to purchase foreign produced items, the State must submit a waiver request that provides an adequate basis and justification for approval by the Secretary of Transportation.

CERTIFICATION ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
No employee, officer, or agent of a State or its subrecipient who is authorized in an official capacity to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or to take part in negotiating, making, accepting, or approving any subaward, including contracts or subcontracts, in connection with this grant shall have, directly or indirectly, any financial or personal interest in any such subaward. Such a financial or personal interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financia! or personal interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a subaward. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct that provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents. a. The code or standards shall provide that the recipient's officers, employees, or agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from present or potential subawardees, including contractors or parties to subcontracts. b. The code or standards shall establish penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions for violations, as permitted by State or local law or regulations.

2. The recipient shall maintain responsibility to enforce the requirements of the written code or standards of conduct.

DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 20 of 23
107
No State or its subrecipient, including its officers, employees, or agents, shall perform or continue to perform under a grant or cooperative agreement, whose objectivity may be impaired because of any related past, present, or currently planned interest, financial or otherwise, in organizations regulated by NHTSA or in organizations whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall disclose any conflict of interest identified as soon as reasonably possible, making an immediate and full disclosure in writing to NHTSA. The disclosure shall include a description of the action which the recipient has taken or proposes to take to avoid or mitigate such conflict.

2. NHTSA will review the disclosure and may require additional relevant information from the recipient.

If a conflict of interest is found to exist, NHTSA may (a) terminate the award, or (b) determine that it is otherwise in the best interest of NHTSA to continue the award and include appropriate provisions to mitigate or avoid such conflict.

3. Conflicts of interest that require disclosure include all past, present, or currently planned organizational, financial, contractual, or other interest(s) with an organization regulated by NHTSA or with an organization whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities, and which are related to this award. The interest(s) that require disclosure include those of any recipient, affiliate, proposed consultant, proposed subcontractor, and key personnel of any of the above. Past interest shall be limited to within one year of the date of award. Key personnel shall include any person owning more than a 20 percent interest in a recipient, and the officers, employees or agents of a recipient who are responsible for making a decision or taking an action under an award where the decision or action can have an economic or other impact on the interests of a regulated or affected organization.

PROHIBITION ON uSING GRANT FUNDS TO CHECK FOR HELMET USAGE (applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will not use 23 u.s.c. Chapter 4 grant funds for programs to check helmet usage or to create checkpoints that specifically target motorcyclists.

POLICY ON SEAT BELT USE
In accordance with Executive Order 13043, Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States, dated April 16, 1997, the Grantee is encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs for its employees when operating company-owned, rented, or personally-owned vehicles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is responsible for providing leadership and guidance in support of this Presidential initiative. For information and resources on traffic safety programs and policies for employers, please contact the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS), a public-private partnership dedicated to improving the traffic safety practices of employers and employees. You can download information on seat belt programs, costs of motor vehicle crashes to employers, and other traffic safety initiatives at www.trafficsafety.orq. The NHTSA website ( www.nhtsa.qov) also provides information on statistics, campaigns, and program evaluations and references.

POLICY ON BANNING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRMNG
In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, States are encouraged to adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted driving, including policies to ban text messaging while driving company-owned or rented vehicles, Government-owned, leased or rented vehicles, or privately-owned vehicles when on official Government business or when performing any work on or behalf of the Government. States are also encouraged to conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as establishment of new rules and programs or re- evaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving, and education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving. 8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 21 of 23
108
State of California - Office of Traffic Safety
OTS-55 Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access Exhibit C

GRANT NLIMBER
PT27039
INSTRuCTIONS FOR ADDING OR UPDATING GEMS USERS

1. Each agency is allowed a total of FIVE (5) GEMS Users.

2. GEMS Users listed on this form will be authorized to login to GEMS to complete and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPRs) and reimbursement claims.

3. Complete the form iF adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s).

4. The Grant Director must sign this form and return it with the Grant Agreement.

GRANTDETAILS
Grant Number: PT27039
Agency Name: Costa Mesa Police Department
Grant Title: Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Agreement Total: $275,500.00
Authorizing Official: Cecilia Gallardo Daly
Fiscal Official: Mark Khou
Grant Director: Daniel Holl

1. Jared Barnes
Title: Traffic Sergeant
Phone: (714) 754-5125
Email: [email protected]
Media Contact: No

2. Kevin Christianson
Title: Special Events Officer
Phone: (714) 754-5108
Email: [email protected]
Media Contact: No

3. Ash Hassan
Title: Finance Officer
Phone: (714) 754-5048
Email: [email protected]
Media Contact: No

4. Marie Norman
Title: Accountant
Phone: (714) 754-5187
Email: [email protected]
Media Contact: No

5. Nick Wilson
Title: Sergeant
Phone: (714) 754-4963
Email: [email protected]
Media Contact: No
8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 22 of 23
109
Complete the below information if adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s) GEMS User I
Add/Change a Remove Access, Add as a media contact? Yes € No€

NICKWILSON LIEUTENANT
Name JobTitle
[email protected] 7147544963
Emailaddress Phonenumber
GEMS USer 2 Add as a media contact? Yes 0 No 0
Add/Change 0 Remove Access [ZI

JAREDBARNES LIEUTENANT
Name JobTitle
[email protected] 714-754-5125
Emailaddress Phonenumber
GEMS USer 3 Add as a media contact? Yes @ No [ZI
Add/Change [ZI Remove Access [ZI

DANIELHOLL TRAFFICSERGEANT
Name JobTitle
[email protected] a714-754-5395
Emailaddress Phonenumber
GEMS USer 4 Add as a media contact? Yes 0 No [ZI
Add/Change [ZI Remove Access [ZI

JAKESCHULZE TRAFFICSERGEANT
Name JobTitle
[email protected] 714-754-4963
Emailaddress Phonenumber
GEMS USer 5 Add as a media contact? Yes [1 No 0
Add/Change 0 Remove Access [ZI
Name JobTitle
Emailaddress Phonenumber
Form cO'T'le'ed by: 5c::'il\4E'Eugu.:_ozsi:izziapo'r) Date: Aug r'i, 2026 As a signatory I hereby authorize the listed individual(s) to represent and have GEMS user access.

Signature Name
Grant Director
Date Title
8/6/2026 7:49:57 AM Page 23 of 23
110

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-397 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
TITLE:

CONTINUATION REQUEST OF THE CONSOLIDATED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE DEPARTMENT: FINANCE DEPARTMENT
PRESENTED BY: ANNA ACOSTA-REYES, FINANCE MANAGER
CONTACT INFORMATION: ANNA ACOSTA-REYES, FINANCE MANAGER, (714) 754-5243 RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council open the public hearing and continue the item to the October 20, 2026, meeting, pursuant to the department’s request.

BACKGROUND:

The item was previously agenized for the September 15, 2026, City Council Meeting. Prior to the meeting, but before the agenda was published, staff requested to continue the item to the October 20, 2026, City Council Meeting.

ANALYSIS:

Staff requests that the public hearing be continued to a date certain to the October 20, 2026, City Council Meeting. Staff will present the item at the October 20, 2026, Meeting.

ALTERNATIVES:

There are no recommended alternatives.

FISCAL REVIEW:

The fiscal review will be included as part of the October 20, 2026, report.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The legal review will be included as part of the October 20, 2026, 2026, report.

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

The priorities will be included as part of the October 20, 2026, report.

CONCLUSION:

The item will be presented at the October 20, 2026, City Council Meeting.

Page 1 of 1 ends

111

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
TITLE:

CITY OF COSTA MESA SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATE (PCTY-25-0002), CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN (PCTY-25-0009), AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE POLICY REVIEW (PCTY- 26-0002)
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING

DIVISION
PRESENTED BY: AMBER GREGG, CONTRACT PROJECT MANAGER, AND

ANNA MCGILL, PLANNING MANAGER
CONTACT INFORMATION: AMBER GREGG, [email protected] RECOMMENDATION:

The Planning Commission recommends the City Council:

2. Adopt a Resolution approving the Safety Element Update and Environmental Justice General Plan Policy Update.

In addition, staff recommends the City Council:

3. Adopt a Resolution approving the City of Costa Mesa Climate Action and Adaptation Plan.

Page 1 of 1 ends

112

Page 1 of 13 ends

City of Costa Mesa
Agenda Report

77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026
TITLE: CITY OF COSTA MESA SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATE (PCTY -25-0002), CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN (PCTY -25-0009), AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE POLICY REVIEW (PCTY-26-0002)

DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION

PRESENTED BY: AMBER GREGG, CONTRACT PROJECT MANAGER, AND

ANNA MCGILL, ADVANCED PLANNING MANAGER

CONTACT INFORMATION: AMBER GREGG, [email protected]

RECOMMENDATION:

The Planning Commission recommends the City Council:

2. Adopt a Resolution approving the Safety Element Update and Environmental Justice General Plan Policy Update ; and
In addition, staff recommends the City Council:

3. Adopt a Resolution approving the City of Costa Mesa Climate Action and Adaptation Plan.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Costa Mesa is advancing three coordinated long-range planning initiatives:

 Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) - Costa Mesa’s first comprehensive climate planning document, which establishes a long -range framework for reducing greenhouse gas emissions while preparing the community for anticipated climate-related conditions;

 Safety Element Update - Modernizes the City’s General Plan policies related to natural and human-caused haza rds, emergency preparedness, infrastructure resilience, and climate adaptation; and

113

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 2 of 13 ends

 Environmental Justice (EJ) Policy Update - Identifies and strengthens policies addressing community health, environmental burdens, access to public facilities and services, infrastructure investment, and meaningful public participation.

Over the past several years, California has adopted legislation requiring local jurisdictions to address climate adaptation, natural hazards, emergency preparedness, and environmental justice through their General Plans and related planning documents. In addition, Costa Mesa’s 2021–2029 Housing Element includes Program 2G, which commits the City to updating its Safety Element and incorporating EJ policies into the General Plan by December 2026. Separately, on October 14, 2024, the City Council authorized preparation of Costa Mesa’s first CAAP.

Although the CAAP, Safety Element, and EJ Policies are separate documents, they rely on common technical information and address many related com munity issues. The City therefore coordinated preparation of the three documents to improve consistency, reduce duplication, and establish a more comprehensive policy framework. The table below identifies the purpose, requirement, and outcome of each document.

Table 1 – Documents Purpose, Requirements, and Outcome
Project Primary Purpose State Requirement Primary Outcome CAAP Reduce greenhouse
gas emissions and
prepare for changing
climate impacts
Although not required by
state law, it supports state
and local climate goals
Climate mitigation and
adaptation strategies
Safety
Element
Update
Protect the community
from natural and
environmental hazards
Government Code section
65302(g), SB 379 and SB
1035
Updated General Plan
safety policies consistent
with the City’s Local
Hazard Mitigation Plan
EJ Policies Promote healthy,
equitable, and resilient
communities
Government Code section
65302(h) (SB 1000)
Identifying existing EJ
policies in the General
Plan and new policies
implementing state law

On July 27, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a study session to receive an introduction to the purpose, technical foundation, policy framework, and relationship among the CAAP, Safety Element Update, and Environmental Justice General Plan Policy Update. Staff presented the technical analyses supporting the documents and explained how the three planning efforts work together to address greenhouse gas reduction, climate adaptation, hazard mitigation, emergency preparedness, and Environmental Justice.

The Commission expressed overall support for the direction of the three initiatives and provided recommendations for refinement prior to the public hearing.

For the CAAP, Planning Commission comments included:

 Bringing key near-term implementation priorities more prominently into the body of the CAAP;

114

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 3 of 13 ends

 Providing greater visibility to quantitative greenhouse gas reduction information contained in Appendix D;
 Clarifying how the City would respond if individual CAAP actions are not pursued or do not achieve anticipated results; and
 Providing for continued monitoring, reporting, and periodic review of implementation.

For the Environmental Justice policies, the Commission recommended additional emphasis on:

 Improving access to healthy food, including farmers markets and urban agriculture opportunities in or near Environmental Justice communities;
 Prioritizing recycling education programs serving Environmental Justice communities; and  Prioritizing cooling centers and emergency service response facilities within Environmental Justice and/or underserved communities when opportunities arise.

On August 10, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the revised draft documents and recommendations to the City Council. Staff presented the revisions completed since the July 27th Study Session, summarized public comments received during the formal review period, and described how the documents had been refined in response to Planning Commission and community input. Following public testimony and Commission discussion, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Safety Element Update and Environmental Justice General Plan Policy Update. The Planning Commission is not a formal reviewing body for the CAAP; however, they were presented with the CAAP for information and discussion purposes and modifications were made based on their feedback.

The documents before the City Council incorporate the revisions presented to and recommended by the Planning Commission, together with final technical and editorial refinements necessary to prepare the documents for adoption. For additional information on these topics please refer to the Study Session and Planning Commission hearing Agenda Reports provided below.

July 27, 2026, Study Session Agenda Report:
https://costamesa.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=8144196&GUID=A28F54A5-01D9-497A- B1B2-503B19901944&Options=&Search=

July 27, 2026, Study Session Minutes:
https://costamesa.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=1429415&GUID=D14C456A-C716-444D-B92A- 5460E080F1C8

August 10, 2026, Planning Commission Agenda Report:
https://costamesa.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=8164831&GUID=02EE162C-3034-4149- 86E9-A807B83CAC23&Options=&Search=

On September 1, 2026, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment to amend the Sixth Cycle Housing Element (2021-2029) to add additional Housing Element Opportunity Sites needed to maintain Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) capacity, and adopt associated revisions. These associated revisions included the EJ policies incorporated into the Housing Element and as a result, the Housing Element is not included in the proposed amendments for this item.

115

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 4 of 13 ends

ANALYSIS:

Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP)

Preparation of the CAAP included a comprehensive greenhouse gas inventory, emissions forecast, climate vulnerability assessment, and implementation strategy. Together, these analyses identify the City’s largest sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, evaluate anticipated climate -related hazards, and provide the technical basis for practical and measurable implementati on actions within the City’s authority.

GHG Inventory and Emissions Forecast

Figure 1 – Costa Mesa 2023 GHG Community Inventory Baseline

The GHG inventory determined that on -road transportation is Costa Mesa's largest source of communitywide GHG emissions, accounting for approximately 63% of total emissions. Building energy is the second largest source at approximately 31%, while emissions from off -road equipment, solid waste, and water and wastewater collectively account for the remaining 6%. These findings indicate that the greatest opportunities for reducing community GHG emissions are through improvements in transportation and mobility, increased building energy efficiency, renewable energy, and continued investment in sustainable municipal operations and community programs.

The emissions forecast further demonstrates that existing state regulations and programs, including cleaner vehicle standards, renewable electricity requirements, and building energy regulations, are expected to substantially reduce community emissions over time. However, the analysis also identifies the remaining local emissions gap to reduce local GHG to 85% by 2045 (per AB 1279) cannot be closed through state actions alone. The CAAP therefore identifies locally appropriat e implementation actions intended to complement statewide efforts and further reduce GHG emissions over the next 20 years helping the state reach carbon neutrality by 2045. Should the City wish to strive for carbon neutrality in the future, strict regulations and reach codes would need to be developed and implemented

116

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 5 of 13 ends

Figure 2 – Costa Mesa Forecasted GHG Emissions

Climate Vulnerability Assessment

The CAAP includes a Climate Vulnerability Assessment that evaluates the City's exposure to climate- related hazards, including extreme heat, drought, flooding, changing precipitation patterns, poor air quality, and wildfire smoke, while also considering community characteristics that may influence vulnerability to these hazards.

Based on the assessment, the CAA P includes adaptation strategies intended to strengthen public infrastructure, improve emergency preparedness, expand urban tree canopy and shade, promote water conservation, protect vulnerable populations, and incorporate resilience into future planning, capital improvement projects, and municipal operations. The combined mitigation and adaptation approach distinguishes a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan from a traditional Climate Action Plan by addressing not only how the City can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but also how Costa Mesa can prepare for climate conditions that may occur over the coming decades.

CAAP Framework

The CAAP establishes a coordinated framework for reducing communitywide greenhouse gas emissions and improving Costa Mesa’s resilience to climate-related hazards. The CAAP is organized around eight sectors that address both communitywide emissions and municipal operations:

117

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 6 of 13 ends

Figure 3 – CAAP Sectors

Consistent with previous City Council direction, the CAAP emphasizes practical implementation strategies through municipal leadership, incentives, education, partnerships, infrastructure investment, grant funding, and voluntary community participation. The Plan does not directly regulate private property or require individual residents or businesses to undertake specific improvements.

The primary objectives and implementation actions include:

 Transportation and Mobility: Expand electric vehicle charging infrastructure; support the transition to zero-emission vehicles; improve sidewalks, bicycle facilities, and active transportation connections; reduce single-occupancy vehicle trips; improve transit access; and support land use patterns that reduce vehicle travel.
 Energy and the Built Environment: Improve building energy efficiency; promote renewable and carbon-free energy; encourage energy conservation; support electrification where feasible; and improve the efficiency of municipal buildings and facilities.  Water and Wastewater: Promote water conservation, drought-resilient landscaping, stormwater management, recycled water opportunities, and coordination with local water providers.
 Solid Waste: Support waste prevention, reuse, recycling, composting, organic-waste diversion, and public education to reduce material sent to landfills.  Off-Road Equipment: Encourage the transition to lower- and zero-emission construction, landscaping, and other off-road equipment through education, incentives, partnerships, and equipment-replacement opportunities.
 Natural and Urban Lands: Expand and maintain the urban tree canopy, increase shade, reduce urban heat-island effects, support habitat and open space, and increase carbon sequestration where feasible.
 People and Community: Improve public awareness and preparedness for extreme heat, drought, flooding, poor air quality, wildfire smoke, and other climate-related hazards; support vulnerable populations; and strengthen community and regional partnerships.

118

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 7 of 13 ends

 Municipal Operations: Lead by example through energy- and water-efficient City facilities, fleet and equipment modernization, waste reduction, sustainable purchasing and operations, grant pursuits, and ongoing implementation monitoring.

Although organized by sector, many CAAP actions provide multiple benefits. For example, expanding tree canopy can reduce heat exposure, improve air quality, increase shade, support habitat, and sequester carbon. Improvements to walking, bicycling, and t ransit can reduce emissions while improving mobility, public health, safety, and access to community resources.

Co-Benefits and Fiscal Benefits

Many CAAP actions can also reduce long -term operating and maintenance costs, improve the efficiency of City facilities and infrastructure, enhance public safety, and leverage outside funding.

Costa Mesa’s prior sustainability initiatives demonstrate these potential benefits. For example, the City’s conversion of approximately 6,150 streetlights to energy -efficient LED fixtures is projected to save approximately $1.63 million in electricity costs over the first 20 years and approximately $204,443 annually thereafter. The project also reduces maintenance needs and improves nighttime visibility and public safety. LE D lighting upgrades at TeWinkle, Wakeham, Heller, and Bark parks provide an additional estimated $5,694 in annual energy-cost savings while reducing maintenance demands.

The City has also successfully used grants, rebates, and partnerships to reduce local project costs.

Examples include $148,210 in grant funding and a $70,000 rebate for the City Hall electric vehicle charging project, $25,670 toward the purchase of three electric municipal vehicles, and $180,000 toward a zero -emission shuttle for the Senio r Center. These projects illustrate how sustainability investments can improve municipal operations, enhance public services, reduce long -term costs, and position the City to compete for future funding opportunities.

Safety Element Update

The General Pla n Safety Element establishes the City's long -term policies for protecting residents, businesses, property, public infrastructure, and essential services from natural and human -caused hazards. State law requires jurisdictions to periodically review and upda te their Safety Elements to reflect current hazard information and planning requirements. The City's 2021-2029 Housing Element also includes Program 2G, which commits the City to completing an update of the Safety Element by December 2026.

Since adoption of Costa Mesa's current Safety Element, State law has expanded the issues that must be addressed. Senate Bill 379 requires cities to evaluate how climate change may affect future hazards and incorporate climate adaptation and resilience strategies into the Safety Element. Senate Bill 1035 requires periodic review and revision of Safety Elements using updated flood, fire, and other hazard information.

A key component of the update is improved coordination with the City's 2022 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP). The LHMP provides the City's most current assessment of hazards and vulnerabilities and identifies mitigation actions intended to reduce risks to life, property, infrastructure, and essential services. It addresses hazards including flooding, earthquakes, severe weather, drought, extreme heat, wildfire, and hazardous materials incidents. Because the LHMP contains the City's most current hazard 119

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 8 of 13 ends

information, it served as a primary technical foundation for the Safety Element Update. A copy of the LHMP is provided below:

City of Costa Mesa Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
https://www.costamesaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/52032/637992796596200000

The Safety Element and LHMP serve complementary purposes. The LHMP focuses on hazard identification, emergency management, and mitigation actions, while the Safety Element incorporates this information into the General Plan and establishes the City's broader, long -term policy framework for addressing hazards through land use planning, infrastructure investment, emergency preparedness, and City programs.

The update also incorporates climate vulnerability and adaptation information developed through the CAAP. Together, the documents provide a coordinated framework:

 The LHMP identifies existing hazards and mitigation strategies;  The CAAP evaluates future climate-related risks and adaptation strategies; and  The Safety Element incorporates applicable findings into the City's long -range General Plan policies.

Following the July 27, 2026 , Planning Commission Study Session, additional revisions were made to strengthen coordination with the City's Environmental Justice policies, including prioritizing public information and education regarding extreme heat and cooling centers within Environm ental Justice communities and prioritizing opportunities for cooling centers and emergency service response facilities within Environmental Justice and/or underserved neighborhoods.

Environmental Justice (EJ) General Plan Policy Update

Senate Bill 1000 requires qualifying jurisdictions to address EJ within their General Plans. EJ planning is intended to reduce disproportionate environmental and health burdens experienced by certain communities while improving access to public facilities, healthy food, physical activity, safe and sanitary housing, and opportunities for meaningful participation in local decision-making.

The City's 2021-2029 Housing Element includes Program 2G, which commits the City to reviewing and updating its General Plan to address EJ requirements by December 2026. As part of this effort, the City conducted a comprehensive review of its existing General Plan to determine the extent to which current goals and policies already address EJ topics required by State law.

The review found that Costa Mesa's General Plan already contains numerous policies that support EJ objectives. Rather than creating a separate EJ Element, the proposed update builds upon the City's existing policy framework by identifying applicable policies throughout the General Plan and proposing targeted amendments and new policies where additional direction is needed. Required EJ policy topics include:

1. Reduce Pollution Exposure 2. Provide Safe & Sanitary Homes

3. Enhance Community Assets 4. Increase Physical Activity

5. Access to Healthy Foods 6. Address Compounded Health Risks

7. Promote Civic Engagement
120

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 9 of 13 ends

As part of the analysis, the City utilized State maps for identifying Environmental Justice communities.

The maps are typically updated annually and currently include s ix census t racts within Costa Mesa which are identified as Environmental Justice communities.

Figure 4 – EJ Census Track Maps

121

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 10 of 13 ends

Identification as an EJ community does not change a property's zoning or General Plan land use designation, create new development restrictions, or impose requirements on individual property owners. Instead, the designation provides a planning tool that can help the City better understand where environmental and socioeconomic burdens may overlap and consider those conditions when conducting outreach, developing programs, pursuing grant funding, and prioritizing future public investments.

The proposed General Plan amendments stre ngthen existing policies related to community health, mobility, parks and recreation, public services, infrastructure, and community participation. Key areas of emphasis include improving access to parks and recreational opportunities; expanding tree canopy and shade; improving walking, bicycling, and transit connections; supporting access to healthy food; reducing pollution exposure where feasible; and encouraging meaningful participation by residents who have historically been underrepresented in local planning processes.

Existing and proposed policies that serve an EJ purpose will be identified with the symbol below, making them easier to locate and track throughout the General Plan.

Figure 4: Symbol to identify Environmental Justice Policies

Following the July 27, 2026, Planning Commission Study Session, the proposed policies were further refined in response to Commission direction. Revisions include:
 Prioritizing and promoting urban agriculture opportunities, including community gardens and farmers markets, within or readily accessible to Environmental Justice communities;  Prioritizing recycling education programs serving Environmental Justice communities; and  Strengthening coordination with the Safety Element by prioritizing extreme heat edu cation, cooling centers, and opportunities for emergency service response facilities within Environmental Justice and/or underserved communities.

A complete reference guide list of the proposed new and amended policies is provided under Attachment 6. Note, the Housing Element chapter is included in this reference guide for informational purposes, even though it was adopted on September 1, 2026 and not included in this item’s proposed amendments.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

The City implemented a comprehensive public engagement program consisting of community outreach events, public workshops, stakeholder meetings (internal and external), surveys, digital engagement, and targeted outreach to gather input throughout the planning process. Key public engagement ac tivities included:
122

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 11 of 13 ends

 Three community pop-up outreach events were held: the 2025 and 2026 Earth Day events and a 2025 Concert in the Park. These events generated approximately 400 community contacts, including:
o Approximately 150 visitors at the 2025 Earth Day event, with over 65 participants providing direct feedback,
o 40 participants at the 2025 Concert in the Park outreach event, and o Over 200 participants at the 2026 Earth Day event.
 Survey: 226 community members participated in the survey, with 158 fully completing the online surveys, regarding transportation, energy, water conservation, solid waste, and climate resilience priorities.
 Employee Engagement: Multiple internal Sustainability Working Group meetings and staff collaboration sessions were conducte d with representatives from City departments to identify operational opportunities, implementation strategies, and climate priorities.  External Focus Group: Representatives from the development community, utilities, nonprofit organizations, educational ins titutions, and community advocacy groups participated in a stakeholder workshop to identify implementation opportunities, barriers, and partnership strategies.  Joint CAAP and Environmental Justice Open House: Approximately 30 community members attended the April 30, 2026 open house, resulting in 37 written comments and 80 prioritization votes on proposed goals and implementation strategies.
 Additional Targeted Outreach: Staff provided a presentation and workshop with the Coastline Regional Occupational Program Sustainability Cohort, site visits with Mesa Water District and Orange County Water District, maintained a dedicated project website, distributed e-blasts and City Hall Snapshot newsletters (reaching more than 10,000 subscribers), utilized social media, and posted informational flyers throughout the community.

Community feedback consistently emphasized improving active transportation, expanding tree canopy and green space, increasing renewable energy opportunities, enhancing water conservation, supporting vulnerable populations, and ensuring implementation strategies are practical, equitable, and financially feasible. Input received throughout the outreach process directly informed refinement of the proposed CAAP and EJ policies.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION

In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the state CEQA Guidelines, the proposed Safety Element Update, Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, and Environmental Justice Policies are exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQ A Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption), as it can be seen with certainty that adoption of these policy documents will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable significant effect on the environment. The proposed documents establish goals, policies, and implementation strategies related to hazard mitigation, climate adaptation, greenhouse gas reduction, emergency preparedness, and community resilience, but do not authorize or approve any specific development or physical improvements.

In addition, the CAAP is also categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15307 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of Natural Resources) and section 15308 (Actions by 123

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 12 of 13 ends

Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment) as th ey are regulatory actions intended to protect and enhance the environment and natural resources through climate action, hazard mitigation, sustainability, and resilience planning. Furthermore, none of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply to the proposed actions, as the adoption of these planning and policy documents will not result in cumulative environmental impacts, impacts to scenic highways, hazardous waste sites, historical resources, or any un usual circumstances that could cause a significant effect on the environment. Any future projects or physical improvements resulting from implementation of these plans will be subject to separate environmental review, as required by CEQA.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council alternatives including the following:

1. Approve the documents with modifications. The City Council may identify specific modifications to one or more of the proposed documents and adopt them as modified.

2. Provide additional direction and continue the item. The City Council may request additional information or revisions and continue consideration to a future meeting.

3. Not approve one or more of the proposed documents. The City Council may elect not to approve the CAAP and/or Safety Element and Envi ronmental Justice updates. The CAAP is not required by State law; however, the Safety Element and Environmental Justice updates are required to address applicable State requirements and the City's Housing Element implementation commitments.

FISCAL REVIEW:

Adoption of the CAAP, Safety Element Update, and Environmental Justice General Plan Policy Update does not itself authorize expenditures for individual implementation projects or programs. The CAAP identifies potential implementation actions that will occur over time and may involve future City work programs, capital improvements, grants, partnerships, incentives, or other expenditures. Individual actions will remain subject to available funding, staffing, technical feasibility, applicable procurement and environmental requirements, and future City Council authorization when required. The CAAP is also intended to position the City to pursue outside funding and partnership opportunities that may assist with implementation.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The proposed Resolution and report have been prepared in conjunction with and review by the City Attorney’s Office.

PUBLIC NOTICE:

Pursuant to Government Code section 65854(a), a public notice was published once in the Daily Pilot newspaper on September 4, 2026, exceeding the minimum 10 days prior to the September 15, 2026, public hearing.

124

Item #: 26-388 Meeting Date: 9/15/2026

Page 13 of 13 ends

Any public comments received for the September 15, 2026 City Council meeting, may be viewed at this link: CITY OF COSTA MESA - Calendar (legistar.com)

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

The proposed CAAP, Safety Element Update, and EJ General Plan Policy Update support the following City Council-adopted goals:

 Advance environmental sustainability and climate resiliency - by establishing strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, prepare for changing climate conditions, conserve resources, and strengthen community resilience.

 Strengthen the public's safety and improve the quality of life - by updating poli cies addressing natural and climate -related hazards, emergency preparedness, infrastructure resilience, community health, and Environmental Justice.

The coordinated planning effort also supports the City's core values of Sustainability, Innovation, Inclusion, and Collaboration through long-range planning, community engagement, and partnerships focused on creating a safe, inclusive, and resilient Costa Mesa.

CONCLUSION:

The draft CAAP, Safety Element Update, and EJ General Plan Policies Update documents represent the culmination of a comprehensive planning effort involving technical analysis, interdepartmental coordination, stakeholder collaboration, and extensive public engagement. Together, these documents establish an integrated framework to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, prepare for the impacts of climate change, strengthen emergency preparedness and community resilience, protect public health and safety, and ensure that environmental benefits and investments are considered throughout Costa Mesa.

125

ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA ,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN (PCTY-25-0009)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA FINDS AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the California Legislature has established statewide greenhouse gas reduction and climate resilience goals through Assembly Bill 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006), Senate Bill 375 (Sustainable Co mmunities and Climate Protection Act of 2008), and Assembly Bill 1279 (California Climate Crisis Act of 2022), which collectively support reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, integrated land use and transportation planning, and the State's goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045; WHEREAS, Government Code section 65302(g)(4), as amended by Senate Bill 379 (2015), requires cities and counties to address climate adaptation and resilience in their General Plan Safety Elements or through incorporation by reference of a climate adaptation plan or document; and
WHEREAS, the Costa Mesa Climate Action and Adaptation Plan includes a greenhouse gas emissions inventory, a climate vulnerability assessment, adaptation goals and strategies, and an implementation program with actions intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and strengthen community resilience, and its adaptation- related findings and strategies support the concurrent update of the City's General Plan Safety Element; and
WHEREAS, in September 2021 the City Council adopted a specific goal to “Advance Environmental Sustainability and Climate Resiliency”; and WHEREAS, in August 2023 the City issued a Request for Proposals from qualified consultants to provide consulting services for the development and approval of the City ’s first Climate Action & Adaptation Plan (CAAP) ; RFP 24-01 was released on August 23, 2023, proposals were due on September 27, 20 23, and, on October 15, 2024, the City Council approved a services agreement with Dudek for consulting services to develop the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan; and
126

Resolution No. 2026-XX Page 2 of 5

WHEREAS, on April 26, 2026, through May 26, 2026, the draft Climate Action and Adaptation Plan policies were made available for public review and comment; and WHEREAS, on April 30, 2026, the city held a public o pen house, presented information regarding the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, and solicited public comments and feedback;
WHEREAS, on July 20, 2026, through August 4, 2026, the draft Climate Action and Adaptation Plan was made available for public review and comment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a study session at its regular meeting of July 27, 2026, where it received a presentation for the introduction of the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan and after public comment the Planning Commission received and filed the report and provided feedback on the document; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on August 10, 2026, with all persons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposals; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on September 15, 2026, with all persons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposals; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the state CEQA Guidelines, the proposed Climate Action and Adaptation Plan is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) , as it can be seen with certainty that adoption of the policy document will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable significant effect on the environment. The proposed document establishes goals, policies, and implementation strategies related to hazard mitigation, climate adaptation, greenhouse gas reduction, emergency preparedness, and community resilience, but does not authorize or approve any specific development or physical improvements. In addition, the CAAP is also categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15307 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of Natural Resources) and section 15308 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment) as they are regulatory actions intended to protect and enhance the environment and natural resources through climate action, hazard mitigation, sustainability, and resilience planning. Furthermore, none of the exceptions to the 127

Resolution No. 2026-XX Page 3 of 5

categorical exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply to the proposed actions, as the adoption of these planning and policy documents will not result in cumulative environmental impacts, impacts to scenic highways, hazardous waste sites, historical resources, or any unusual circumstances that could cause a significant effect on the environment. Any future projects or physical improvements resulting from implementation of these plans will be subject to separate environmental review, as required by CEQA.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Costa Mesa City Council, in its independent judgment and after fully considering all testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing hereby finds as follows:

SECTION 1: That the proposed Climate Action and Adaptation Plan is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3), 15307, and 15308.

S ECTION 2 : City Council a pproves the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan included within Exhibit A.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Costa Mesa City Council does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon the activity as described in the staff report, and compliance of all applicable federal, state, and local laws.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if any section, division, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this resolution, or the document in the record in support of this resolution, are for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ________ day of September, 2026.

John Stephens, Mayor

128

Resolution No. 2026-XX Page 4 of 5

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________ _____________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2026-xx and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the ___day of _____, 2026, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this ___day of _____, 2026.

___________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

129

Resolution No. 2026-XX Page 5 of 5

EXHIBIT A
130
ATTACHMENT 2

EXHIBIT A
-1-
131
-2-
132
City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 i Contents
SECTION PAGE NO.

Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................................................iii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. vi Reader’s Guide ....................................................................................................................................................... xi 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Climate Action .......................................................................................................................................... 13 3 Climate Adaptation .................................................................................................................................. 18 4 Outreach and Engagement .................................................................................................................... 36 5 Climate Action and Adaptation Strategy ............................................................................................. 48 6 Implementation and Monitoring ............................................................................................................. 82 Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. xvii Glossary .................................................................................................................................................................. xix TABLES
3-1 Changes in Extreme Heat ........................................................................................................................ 21 3-2 Changes in Extreme Precipitation ........................................................................................................... 25 5-1 Sectors, Objectives, and Actions ............................................................................................................ 61 5-2 Community Greenhouse Gas Reduction Summary ............................................................................. 72 5-3 Municipal Greenhouse Gas Reduction Summary................................................................................. 77

FIGURES
1-1 Greenhouse Effect ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1-2 Venn Diagram of Climate Action and Adaptation ................................................................................ 7 2-1 Climate Action Process ............................................................................................................................ 13 2-2 City of Costa Mesa 2023 Baseline Emissions Inventory ......................................................................... 14 2-3 Communitywide ABAU GHG Emissions Projections ............................................................................... 16 2-4 Communitywide ABAU GHG Emissions Projections, Reduction Targets, and Local Gap ................ 17 3-1 Urban Heat Island Infographic ................................................................................................................ 22 3-2 Urban Heat Island Severity ....................................................................................................................... 24 3-3 Federal Emergency Management Agency–Designated Flood Zones .............................................. 27 3-4 Fire Hazard Severity Zones ........................................................................................................................ 30 3-5 Deep-Seated Landslide Zones and Fire Hazard Severity Zones .......................................................... 32 4-1 Outreach Timeline ..................................................................................................................................... 37 -3-
133

CONTENTS
City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 ii

APPENDICES
A Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, Forecasting, and Target Setting B Climate Vulnerability Assessment
C Outreach and Engagement Materials
D Greenhouse Gas Reduction Supporting Material
E Implementation Plan
F Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
-4-
134

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 iii Acknowledgments
City Council Consultants
John Stephens, Mayor Community Catalyst
Manuel Chavez, Mayor Pro Tem, District 4 Dudek
Council Member Mike Buley, District 1 Fehr & Peers
Council Member Loren Gameros, District 2 M. Cubed
Council Member Andrea Marr, District 3 Michael Hendrix Consulting Council Member Arlis Reynolds, District 5
Council Member Jeff Pettis, District 6

City Departments
City Manager’s Office
Community Development Department
Finance Department
Fire and Rescue Department
Information Technology Department
Office of Emergency Management
Parks and Community Services Department
Police Department
Public Works Department

-5-
135

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 iv

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

-6-
136

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 v

Executive
Summary
-7-
137

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 vi Executive Summary
The City of Costa Mesa (City or Costa Mesa) Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) presents a comprehensive, forward-looking strategy to address the dual challenges of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
and preparing the community for the
growing impacts of climate change. The
CAAP is a locally tailored, integrated
roadmap that aligns climate-ready goals
with how the community lives, grows, and
plans for the future, while supporting
continued growth and quality of life.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
A GHG inventory was prepared to define Costa Mesa’s emissions profile and establish a baseline for forecasting emissions and tracking progress toward achieving the City’s reduction goals. On-road transportation and building energy use account for 94% of total community- wide GHG emissions and therefore represent the largest and most impactful opportunities for emission reductions. The City’s GHG reduction targets are aligned with California’s statewide climate goals, which are established through state law. The City’s targets for 2030 and 2045 reflect the reduction goals set by Senate Bill (SB) 32 (reduce GHG emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030) and Assembly Bill (AB) 1279 (reduce anthropogenic GHG emissions 85% below 1990 levels by 2045), respectively, and are based on the City’s proportional share of the emissions reductions needed statewide.

While State and Federal regulations are expected to reduce emissions over time, they are not sufficient to meet the City’s targets and additional reductions of approximately 154,700 metric tons (MT) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) by 2030 and 198,600 MT CO₂e by 2045. To mitigate the City’s contribution to climate change and achieve the necessary GHG reductions, the CAAP strategy proposes targeted actions to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT), accelerate electrification, improve efficiency, reduce waste, and expand nature- based solutions to drive carbon sequestration.

Climate-Related Hazards
To adapt to the inevitable impacts of climate change, the City must prepare for long-term shifts in temperature, precipitation patterns, and extreme weather. Costa Mesa typically benefits from

A PRACTICAL FRAMEWORK
Building on existing efforts and
grounded in community input, the
CAAP prioritizes practical actions to
reduce emissions, strengthen
resilience, and advance equitable,
responsible development.
-8-
138

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 vii a mild coastal climate, strong infrastructure, and valued public parks, community centers, and emergency facilities; however, climate change is projected to intensify key hazards. Extreme heat is projected to increase significantly, with the number of extreme heat days rising from a historical average of 3 days per year to 11–25 days per year by 2100. Both drought conditions and precipitation extremes are expected to intensify; extreme storms have historically averaged

3.14 inches of rain but are projected to result in 4.52–5.10 inches of rain by 2100.

These changes will place growing stress on infrastructure, natural systems, and public health, with disproportionate impacts on vulnerable populations and neighborhoods. Addressing these inequities is central to the City’s adaptation strategy.

Outreach and Engagement
The CAAP was shaped through a comprehensive, inclusive, and collaborative engagement process that reflects Costa Mesa’s diverse community. The City meaningfully engaged more than 340 residents, businesses, and stakeholders to ensure the plan is grounded in community priorities and lived experiences. There were multiple opportunities for the community to engage with plan development including the following:
• A public open house
• Community survey
• Pop-up outreach activities at public events and high schools • Site visits and presentations to local and regional utilities • External focus group outreach
• Internal working group with City departments and divisions • Presentation to the City Council
• Digital outreach via social media, email, and the City Hall Snapshot newsletter • Informative fliers posted in local coffee shops and at sustainability events Engagement efforts emphasized broad accessibility, with bilingual materials, flexible participation options, and targeted outreach to underrepresented groups.

Community input was essential and directly informed the CAAP’s strategies and actions, ensuring they are grounded in local context and community needs. Engagement will continue beyond plan adoption, to support community education, participation, and shared ownership of Costa Mesa’s climate goals.
-9-
139

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 viii Framework for Climate Action and Adaptation
The CAAP establishes a coordinated strategy that integrates GHG emissions reduction and climate resilience into a single framework of eight key sectors that reflect sources of emissions and areas of climate vulnerability. The CAAP establishes clear objectives, outlined below:

On-Road Transportation
T1. Transition to Electric Vehicles
T2. Promote Walking and Biking
T3. Reduce Single-Occupancy Vehicle Trips
T4. Increase Public Transportation Use
T5. Support Smart Growth
Energy and Buildings
E1. Reduce Energy Demand in Buildings
E2. Decarbonize Building Energy Use
E3. Increase Carbon-Free Energy Supply
Water and Wastewater
W1. Reduce Water Use
W2. Increase Water Reuse
Solid Waste
SW1. Reduce Waste Generation
Off-Road Equipment
OR1. Accelerate Zero-Emission Off-Road
Equipment Adoption
Natural and Urban Lands
NU1. Increase Carbon Sequestration
through Urban Greening
People and Community
PC1. Prepare Community Members
for Hazards
PC2. Limit Hazard Impacts
PC3. Build City and Regional Capacity for
CAAP Implementation
PC4. Foster Local Sustainable Practices
Municipal
M1. Reduce City Vehicle Emissions
M2. Reduce City Energy Use
M3. Zero-Emission Off-Road and
Landscaping Equipment
M4. Reduce City Facility Water Use
M5. Reduce City-Generated Solid Waste
The CAAP objectives are supported by a comprehensive set of 106 individual actions to achieve the City’s 2030 and 2045 goals. To accelerate early momentum, the CAAP prioritizes a set of “20 Actions in 2 Years” that are achievable, impactful, and foundational to long- term success. The City is positioned to meet its 2030 and 2045 GHG reduction targets, provided all performance metrics are achieved.
-10-
140

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 ix Implementation
The CAAP includes an implementation
framework to ensure actions are
coordinated, accountable, and tracked over
time. Led by the City Manager’s Office,
implementation will involve all City
departments and partnerships with
community and regional organizations, with
progress measured through performance
indicators tied to emissions reductions and
other outcomes.

The CAAP builds upon the City’s existing efforts to envision a cleaner, more efficient, and more resilient Costa Mesa. Residents benefit from improved air quality, more sustainable mobility options, energy-efficient buildings, and expanded green spaces, while the community is better prepared for climate impacts through stronger systems, informed residents, and targeted support for those most at risk. By integrating climate action and adaptation into a unified strategy, Costa Mesa is positioning itself to support the State’s GHG reduction goals, protect public health, and enhance quality of life for current and future generations.

IMPORTANCE OF CITY LEADERSHIP
The City will lead by example by
transitioning its own fleet and
facilities to zero-emission systems,
investing in renewable energy and
efficiency upgrades, reducing water
use, and integrating sustainability
into day-to-day operations.
-11-
141

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 x

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-12-
142

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xi Reader’s Guide

Chapter 1, Introduction, outlines the approach and core goals of the CAAP, and provides an understanding of key CAAP concepts and relevant regulatory efforts. In addition, Chapter 1 outlines how the CAAP builds on the City’s existing sustainability efforts, discusses how the CAAP enhances community well-being through co-benefits, and highlights the importance and need for community contribution.

Chapter 2, Climate Action, presents the core components of the City’s climate action planning process, including development of a baseline GHG emissions inventory, future emissions forecasting, target setting, and gap analysis. Together, these elements establish the foundation for identifying emission reduction actions, as detailed in Chapter 5. Supporting materials for Chapter 2 are provided in Appendix A, GHG Emissions Inventory, Forecasting, and Target Setting.

Chapter 3, Climate Adaptation, provides an overview of current and project climate-related hazards in Costa Mesa, and examines their potential impacts on specific community members. This chapter establishes the foundation for understanding local vulnerabilities and the need for targeted adaptation measures and actions. Additional technical details are provided in Appendix B, Climate Vulnerability Assessment.

Chapter 4, Outreach and Engagement, summarizes the community engagement process that informed the CAAP, detailing the strategies used to gather input and key outcomes that reflect the unique needs and perspectives of Costa Mesa’s residents and businesses.

Supporting materials for Chapter 4 are provided in Appendix C, Community Engagement and Outreach Materials.

This guide is designed to help readers quickly locate key information within the CAAP. The document is written to be accessible and informative for a wide range of audiences; more detailed technical data, methodologies, and supporting analyses are provided in the appendices. Each chapter of the CAAP includes references to relevant appendices for readers seeking additional detail.
-13-
143
READER’S GUIDE

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xii Chapter 5, Sectors, Objectives, and Actions, presents a clear roadmap for achieving the emission reduction targets outlined in Chapter 2 and addressing the climate hazards identified in Chapter 3. It is organized across eight sectors with key objectives and specific actions.

Supporting technical details are provided in Appendix D, Greenhouse Gas Reduction Supporting Materials.

Chapter 6, Implementation and Monitoring, outlines the City’s approach to implementing and monitoring progress on the CAAP to ensure the successful achievement of its climate action and adaptation goals. It establishes a framework for accountability and adaptability, including roles and responsibilities, performance metrics, timelines, funding strategies, and ongoing community engagement. Detailed implementation materials are provided in Appendix E, Implementation Plan.

A glossary of key terms and an acronym and abbreviation list are provided following the chapters.

-14-
144

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 i CHAPTER 1
Introduction
-15-
145

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 1 1 Introduction
A Climate Plan Tailored to Our Community
The City of Costa Mesa CAAP is a roadmap
for the community to thrive, supporting
continued growth and quality of life while
preparing for and addressing climate
change. The CAAP is tailored to Costa Mesa
and focuses on practical, locally relevant
efforts that align with how the Costa Mesa
lives, grows, and plans for the future.

Bringing together the City’s current and past
climate initiatives, the CAAP serves as a unified framework that builds on what has worked while addressing gaps and opportunities for improvement. It focuses on steady, practical progress, prioritizing actions that reduce emissions while strengthening resilience.

The CAAP is designed to work with, not against, continued growth and development by supporting smart, sustainable land use, transportation, and infrastructure decisions. The City recognizes that the goal is not to slow progress but to ensure it happens responsibly and equitably.

To ensure alignment with local priorities, community input from residents, businesses, and interested parties was central to CAAP development and highlighted the importance of affordability, mobility, and community character. This feedback guided the approach to advancing climate goals in a balanced, intentional manner.

The CAAP reflects an integrated approach to align multiple priorities while moving forward with local climate action and adaptation. It provides clear opportunities to reduce emissions, prepare for climate impacts, and support a resilient, thriving community into the future.

THE CAAP WILL HELP US:
• Protect our environment
• Safeguard our community
• Support economic growth
• Plan for our future
-16-
146
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 2

Building on Existing Efforts
Costa Mesa is not starting from zero. Since establishing its Energy and Sustainability Division in 2019, the City has advanced a range of programs to reduce emissions, improve efficiency, and strengthen resilience. These efforts provide a strong foundation for this plan and help build momentum toward achieving ambitious climate goals.

Energy Efficiency and Municipal Operations.

Costa Mesa is improving efficiency across City
operations, including the upgrade of over 6,000
streetlights to energy-efficient LEDs, in
partnership with Southern California Edison. The
upgrade has reduced energy use and lowered
maintenance costs and needs. The City is also
advancing energy efficiency and renewable
energy across municipal facilities. These results
earned Costa Mesa the Leadership in Energy
and Environmental Design (LEED) for Cities and
Communities Gold certification, recognizing
strong performance across the energy, water,
waste, transportation, and resilience sectors.

RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS
The CAAP unifies the City’s existing plans, policies, and previous climate initiatives into a single, cohesive framework.

Plans reviewed and considered during CAAP development include the General Plan, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Urban Water Management Plan, Active Transportation Plan, and Pedestrian Master Plan.
-17-
147
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 3 Transportation and Mobility. Costa Mesa is
expanding lower-emission, accessible
transportation options for the community. The
City has added public electric vehicle (EV)
charging at City Hall and is advancing a
transition to a zero-emission municipal fleet,
supported by grant funding. The City has also
launched “Let’s Go Costa Mesa,” an on-
demand, all-electric rideshare service that
improves mobility for seniors and underserved
residents while reducing trips and tailpipe
emissions. Ongoing investments in bicycle,
pedestrian, and Complete Streets
improvements are making it safer and easier
to choose affordable lower-emission
travel options.

Waste Reduction. Costa Mesa is reducing
waste through targeted policies and
programs. In 2019, the City prohibited the use
and purchase of expanded polystyrene
(Styrofoam) food service products at City
facilities and events. The City also supports
recycling and organic waste reduction efforts
and provides community education on State
requirements like Senate Bill (SB) 1383, helping
residents and businesses better manage
waste and reduce landfill impacts.
-18-
148
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 4 Urban Forestry, Open Space, and
Nature-Based Resilience. The City continues to
invest in urban greening and ecosystem
health. Examples of recent and ongoing
projects include over 20 acres of restoration
spanning the Mesa Restoration Project; Bluff
Restoration Project; Vernal Pool 5, 6, and 7
Restoration Project; and a variety of other
smaller community restoration projects.

Costa Mesa has earned the Arbor Day
Foundation’s Tree City USA designation for over
two decades, reflecting its commitment to effective tree management. This program provides a framework for maintaining a healthy urban forest while increasing awareness of the environmental and community benefits that trees provide.

The City’s Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Plan also ensures the health of Costa Mesa’s ecosystems. Adopted in 2019, the IPM Plan prioritizes organic and least-toxic treatments, reduces fertilizer use, and focuses on prevention first. This balanced, eco-friendly approach protects community health, supports local ecosystems, and goes beyond the regulatory requirements of Federal, State, and Orange County agencies.

-19-
149
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 5

-20-
150
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 6 Understanding the Basics
Science of Climate Change
Climate change refers to long-term shifts in climate, such as changes to temperature, precipitation, and wind patterns. While the climate has changed naturally in the past, recent changes are mainly caused by human activities that release GHGs, such as burning fossil fuels, as well as changes in land use.

GHGs trap heat and warm the planet through a process known as the greenhouse effect (Figure 1-1). This is a natural process that makes Earth livable, but higher levels of GHGs are intensifying this process and causing temperatures to rise beyond what’s typical, and GHG levels in the atmosphere are higher than they have been in hundreds of thousands of years.

Although climate change is a global issue, its effects are also felt locally. In California, this includes more frequent and intense heat waves, increased risk of flooding and drought, and larger, more severe wildfires.

Figure 1-1. Greenhouse Effect

Source: Dudek.
-21-
151
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 7 Climate Action and Adaptation
Addressing climate change requires a holistic, integrated approach that both reduces contributions to climate change and prepares for its impacts. To lessen—or “mitigate”—their contributions to climate change, communities can reduce GHG emissions through climate action. To address the unavoidable effects of climate change—or “adapt”—communities assess vulnerabilities and prepare for current and future climate-related impacts through climate adaptation.

As shown in Figure 1-2, climate action and adaptation are complementary and often overlapping approaches. Many strategies can both reduce emissions and build resilience, demonstrating how coordinated efforts can maximize benefits and support a more sustainable, climate-ready future.

Figure 1-2. Venn Diagram of Climate Action and Adaptation

Source: Dudek.
-22-
152
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 8 Regulatory Efforts to Address Climate Change
Federal, state, regional, and local efforts work together to reduce emissions and prepare for climate impacts. The policies below provide context for the CAAP and help guide local action.

FEDERAL CONTEXT
Federal policies help support climate action and adaptation across the country by funding projects and setting national goals. Recent laws, including the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (2021) and the Inflation Reduction Act (2022), invest in clean energy, EVs, energy efficiency, and more-resilient infrastructure. Executive Order 14057 (2021) also established Federal goals to achieve a carbon-pollution-free electricity sector by 2035 and net-zero emissions economy-wide by 2050. These programs and policies are helping communities reduce emissions and prepare for climate impacts.

While national goals to reduce GHG emissions remain in place, implementation and priorities continue to evolve. Despite this progress, uncertainty around long-term policy direction highlights the important role of State and local governments in advancing consistent and sustained climate action.

STATE CONTEXT
California has established one of the nation’s most comprehensive climate policy frameworks through Executive Orders, legislation, and statewide plans that address GHG emissions reduction and climate resilience. Together, these policies set a clear direction for the pace and scale of climate action and adaptation and provide an important foundation for local planning efforts.

State regulations and policies inform the CAAP
effort by establishing statewide benchmarks,
implementing GHG-reducing regulations, and
providing tools to measure progress. Regulations
reflected in GHG forecasting and target-setting
assumptions are summarized in Appendix A.

MEASURING EMISSIONS
Carbon dioxide equivalents
(CO2e) are used in this plan to
express all GHGs on a common
scale based on their
climate impact.
-23-
153
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 9

Source: Dudek (graphic); data from U.S. EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator.

Climate Mitigation Goals
California’s long-term GHG reduction targets include:
• Executive Order S-3-05 (2005): Reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels by 2010, 1990 levels by 2020, and 80% below 1990 levels by 2050.
• Assembly Bill (AB) 32 (2006): Established a comprehensive program to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
• SB 32 (2016): Requires a 40% reduction in GHG emissions below 1990 levels by 2030. -24-
154
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 10 • Executive Order B-55-18 (2018): Sets a goal of carbon neutrality by 2045 and net-negative GHG emissions thereafter.
• AB 1279 (2022): Codifies the 2045 net-zero-emissions goal and requires at least an 85% reduction below 1990 GHG emission levels by that year.

Climate Adaptation Goals
California law also emphasizes climate adaptation and resilience. SB 379 (2015) amended Government Code Section 65302 to require local governments to address climate-related risks in long-term planning. Consistent with these requirements, the CAAP includes:
• A vulnerability assessment identifying climate risks, such as flooding and wildfire, as well as areas most at risk
• Adaptation goals, policies, and objectives informed by identified vulnerabilities • Feasible implementation measures designed to improve resilience and reduce climate impacts
A Community-Driven Approach
Delivering the CAAP will take continued
coordination across City departments, regional
partners, businesses, and the community. Costa
Mesa is already building this collaborative
foundation by working with utilities, agencies,
and community organizations to expand
programs, secure funding, and deliver
practical, cost-effective solutions.

Community involvement will remain central.

Input from residents, businesses, and stakeholders has helped shape this plan and will continue to guide updates, priorities, and on-the-ground efforts. Importantly, everyday choices such as conserving energy and water, choosing alternative transportation, reducing waste, and caring for neighborhood green spaces play a critical role. Although these actions may seem small on their own, taken together across the community, they will drive measurable progress and help scale local efforts into lasting, citywide impact.

By building on existing programs and working together, Costa Mesa can take meaningful, locally relevant steps toward a more sustainable and resilient future.

-25-
155
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 11

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-26-
156

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 12 ch 2
CHAPTER 2
Climate Action
-27-
157

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 13 2 Climate Action
Process
Climate action includes the steps we take to reduce the impacts of climate change by avoiding, reducing, or sequestering GHG emissions. The CAAP climate action process centers on establishing a baseline emissions inventory, projecting future emissions, setting reduction targets, identifying the resulting emissions gap, and outlining strategies to close that gap.

This chapter summarizes these foundational steps: inventory, forecasting, target setting, and gap analysis (Figure 2-1). Chapter 5 then describes the specific actions the City can take to reduce GHG emissions to meet its climate goals.

Figure 2-1. Climate Action Process

-28-
158
CHAPTER 2 CLIMATE ACTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 14 Baseline Inventory
An emissions inventory provides a snapshot of GHG emissions within a defined area during a given year. For the CAAP, the baseline inventory reflects emissions in Costa Mesa in 2023.

Establishing a baseline inventory helps identify the primary sources of emissions across sectors, which informs where actions can have the greatest impact. The baseline inventory also provides a foundation for tracking progress over time and for evaluating how emissions may change in the future.

Figure 2-2 summarizes the 2023 baseline communitywide emissions inventory. As shown, on-road transportation and energy are the largest sources of emissions, together accounting for the majority of communitywide GHG emissions (totaling approximately 94%). Additional methodological details and assumptions are provided in Appendix A.

Figure 2-2. City of Costa Mesa 2023 Baseline Emissions Inventory

-29-
159
CHAPTER 2 CLIMATE ACTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 15 Forecasting
The City’s GHG emissions were projected for
2030 and 2045 using two scenarios: business
as usual (BAU) and adjusted business as
usual (ABAU). The BAU scenario estimates
future emissions based only on expected
growth in population, employment, and
other factors, assuming no additional
actions are taken to reduce emissions
beyond those already in place today.

The ABAU scenario uses the same growth
assumptions but also reflects the effects of
existing federal and state policies that are
expected to reduce emissions over time.

These include regulations that have already
been adopted and are scheduled to take
effect between the 2023 baseline year and
2030 and 2045. Additional methodological
details are provided in Appendix A.

Figure 2-3 compares projected emissions
under the ABAU scenario with the BAU
trend. As shown, state-mandated policies and programs are expected to account for a substantial portion of future emissions reductions.

MUNICIPAL EMISSIONS
4,683 MT CO2e
The City also prepared a municipal
inventory that estimates GHG
emissions from City government
operations, including City buildings,
vehicle fleets, and employee
activities. These emissions are a
subset of the communitywide
inventory and so are already
included in the communitywide
total. Municipal emissions are
reported separately to highlight
emissions from City operations and
should not be interpreted as
additional emissions beyond the
communitywide inventory.
-30-
160
CHAPTER 2 CLIMATE ACTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 16 Figure 2-3. Communitywide ABAU GHG Emissions Projections

Source: Dudek.

Target Setting and Local Gap
The City’s GHG reduction targets are aligned with California’s statewide climate goals, which are established through state law. The City’s targets for 2030 and 2045 reflect the reduction goals set by SB 32 (reduce GHG emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030) and AB 1279 (reduce anthropogenic GHG emissions 85% below 1990 levels by 2045), respectively, and are based on the City’s proportional share of the emissions reductions needed statewide. These targets were refined to reflect local conditions by focusing on sectors and emission sources relevant to Costa Mesa’s community and jurisdiction. Aligning local targets with the state framework helps ensure that Costa Mesa is contributing to statewide efforts to reduce GHG emissions. Additional details on the target-setting approach are provided in Appendix A. -31-
161
CHAPTER 2 CLIMATE ACTION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 17 Figure 2-4 compares projected emissions under the ABAU scenario with the City’s 2030 and 2045 GHG reduction targets. While state policies are expected to reduce emissions over time, these actions alone are not sufficient to meet the City’s long-term climate goals. To close this gap, the City will need to implement additional local actions to reduce communitywide emissions by approximately 154,700 MT CO2e by 2030 and 198,600 MT CO2e by 2045.

Figure 2-4. Communitywide ABAU GHG Emissions Projections, Reduction Targets, and Local Gap

Source: Dudek.

At the municipal level, the City will need to implement actions to achieve reductions of approximately 911 MT CO2e by 2030 and 1,516 MT CO2e by 2045, to align with the state’s climate goals. GHG emission reduction and sequestration sectors, objectives, and actions identified to fill the local gap are discussed in Chapter 5.

-32-
162

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 0

CHAPTER 3
Climate Adaptation
-33-
163

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 18 3 Climate Adaptation
Natural hazards are physical events, like flooding, extreme heat, or earthquakes, that have the potential to cause harm or damage to people or places. Every city has unique risks associated with certain natural hazards; some natural hazards, referred to as climate-related hazards, are projected to experience changes in the future due to a variety of factors, including global GHG emissions. In Costa Mesa, the primary climate-related hazards include extreme heat, drought, flooding, and wildfire. Climate adaptation focuses on reducing risks and strengthening resilience to these climate-related hazards.

The following chapter outlines the interactions between Costa Mesa’s people, infrastructure, natural environment, and climate-related hazards. It draws on state climate modeling, local hazard data, and community characteristics to identify key vulnerabilities and inform equitable and effective adaptation strategies.

Additional climate hazard analysis can be found in Appendix C.

Source: Cal-Adapt. 2025. “Global Climate Models HadGEM2 - ES, CNRM -CM5, CanESM2, MIROC5.” Cal -Adapt website developed by University of California at Berkeley’s Geospatial Innovation Facility under contract with the California Energy Commission. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://cal-adapt.org.

PROJECTING HAZARDS
Climate models project future hazard trends. This chapter includes modeled data for three timelines: a historical baseline (1961–1990), mid-century projections (2034–2064), and end-of-century projections (2065–2099).

Long-term climate models are heavily impacted by the amount of global GHG emissions. As such, end-of-century projections often discuss two scenarios:
• A medium -emissions scenario that assumes global emissions peak in 2040 and then decline
• A high -emissions scenario that assumes emissions continue to rise through 2100
-34-
164
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 19

Drought
Droughts are long periods of time with limited precipitation and have historically occurred naturally in Southern California.

Projected Changes
Under a high-emissions scenario, climate models project significantly drier soils in the future and an 80% chance of prolonged, multi-decade drought between 2050 and 2099.1 Spatial Extent
Drought occurs on a regional scale, and its local impacts are most closely tied to water supply.

Costa Mesa’s two water suppliers, Mesa Water District (90% of Costa Mesa water users) and Irvine Ranch Water District, both rely primarily on local groundwater.2 This water supply type offers more immediate drought resilience than surface water supply. It also involves more local control over watershed management than imported water, from the State Water Project or Colorado River, for example. However, groundwater remains sensitive to long-term recharge conditions and requires careful management and planning.

Impacts

1 Swain et al. 2018. “Increasing Precipitation Volatility in Twenty-First-Century California.” Nature Climate Change 8: 427–433.
2 Mesa Water District. 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Final. June 2021. https://www.mesawater.org/sites/default/files/Save%20Water/Documents/Mesa%20Water%202020%20UWMP% 20FINAL-2021.06.30.pdf. Irvine Ranch Water District. 2021; 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2021. https://www.irwd.com/images/pdf/doing-business/environmental-documents/UWMP/ 2020_urban_water_management_plan_irwd_adopted_june2021.pdf.

In Costa Mesa, drought is expected to cause long-term stress to groundwater systems, increasing the need for groundwater recharge and additional water- efficiency measures and likely resulting in increased water costs. Low-income households may be particularly affected because a larger share of their income goes to necessities. Water management planning, infrastructure, and cost assistance programs by Mesa Water District, Irvine Ranch Water District, and regional water management agencies like Orange County Water District are important to ensure long-term adaptive capacity.
-35-
165
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 20

Extreme Heat
Extreme heat refers to times when temperatures rise to levels that community members are not accustomed to. This means that extreme heat events can be different from place to place; for example, an extreme heat event in Costa Mesa can occur at a cooler temperature than one in San Bernardino.

Extreme heat can be a single occurrence of high temperatures, such as an extreme heat day.

In Costa Mesa, this is defined as a day exceeding 93°F. Extreme heat can also be continuously high temperatures over the course of multiple days, which can make it difficult for a person to recover. This type of extreme heat can include heat waves (four or more consecutive extreme heat days) or warm nights (when nighttime temperatures remain above 80°F).3 Projected Changes
Historically, Costa Mesa’s proximity to the ocean has limited extreme heat to only a handful of days per year, but extreme heat represents one of the most significant growing climate risks for Costa Mesa (see Table 3-1).

Extreme heat days are projected to more than triple by mid-century; depending on global GHG emissions, they may stabilize or increase further. In addition, while heat waves and warm nights are currently an uncommon occurrence, they each have the potential to become more common under a high-emissions scenario.4

3 Cal-Adapt 2025, “Extreme Heat Day.”
4 Cal-Adapt 2025, “Extreme Heat Days.”
-36-
166
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 21

Table 3-1. Changes in Extreme Heat

Source: Cal-Adapt 2025, “Extreme Heat Days.”
Spatial Extent
Heat impacts vary locally due to the urban heat island effect (described on Figure 3-1). In Costa Mesa, inland areas, large parking lots, turf sports fields, industrial zones, and areas with limited tree canopy experience higher temperatures than coastal or well-vegetated areas (see local urban heat island severity on Figure 3-2).
-37-
167
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 22

Figure 3-1. Urban Heat Island Infographic

Source: Dudek.
-38-
168
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 23

Impacts

Extreme heat poses serious public health risks. Older adults and young children often feel the impacts of extreme heat earlier or more intensely than others. Outdoor workers and people experiencing homelessness are outside more frequently and are therefore more exposed to extreme heat. Residents may also experience extreme heat more regularly if they’re without air conditioning or are forced to not run air conditioning due to the additional cost of energy. Rising temperatures also drive increased electricity demand, raising concerns about strain on the regional power grid and the affordability of cooling. Southern California Edison works throughout the region to improve energy reliability and provides assistance programs that can reduce the energy cost burdens for qualified households.
-39-
169
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 24

Figure 3-2. Urban Heat Island Severity

Source: The Trust for Public Land. 2023. “Heat Severity USA 2023.” https://www.arcgis.com/apps/ webappviewer/index.html?id=1b6cad6dd5854d2aa3d215a39a4d372d .

-40-
170
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 25

Flooding
Flooding occurs when water inundates land that is normally dry, and it can endanger human life or cause infrastructure damage or utility interruptions. Flooding in Costa Mesa is primarily associated with extreme precipitation or atmospheric river events. Dam or levee failures connected to the Santa Ana River system also have the potential to result in flooding. Additionally, coastal communities can experience flooding from tidal events and sea level rise.

Projected Changes
Extreme precipitation intensity is projected to increase over time. An approximately 20% increase by mid-century and up to a 50% increase by the end of the century are projected under a high-emissions scenario.5 While the intensity of extreme precipitation is projected to increase, the frequency of extreme precipitation events is projected to remain relatively stable moving forward. See Table 3-2 for projected extreme precipitation data trends.

Table 3-2. Changes in Extreme Precipitation

Source: Cal-Adapt. 2025. “Extreme Precipitation for Costa Mesa, Global Climate Models HadGEM2- ES, CNRM-CM5, CanESM2, MIROC5.” Cal -Adapt website developed by University of California at Berkeley’s Geospatial Innovation Facility under contract with the California Energy Commission. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://cal-adapt.org.

5 Cal-Adapt. 2025. “Extreme Precipitation for Costa Mesa.” -41-
171
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 26

Spatial Extent
Figure 3-3 displays the City’s flood risk zones as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The City’s developments are generally outside of flood zones; however, extreme scenarios could produce broader impacts, particularly in northeastern Costa Mesa.

Flooding as a result of dam failure is another risk. Major dams can experience overtopping during extreme precipitation, increasing the potential for failure. Costa Mesa is downstream of the Prado, Santiago, and Villa Park Dams, which each present major flood risk in northern and western Costa Mesa in the unlikely event of failure. To learn more information about these dams, refer to the City’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.6 Impacts

6 City of Costa Mesa. 2022. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. November 4, 2022. Accessed June 30, 2026. https://www.costamesaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/52032/637992796596200000.

The City’s local stormwater system and regional dams and levees largely protect residents from flooding, but extreme events such as 500-year storms (0.2% annual chance of occurrence) or dam failures have the potential to result in impacts to upward of 5,000 households and a variety of City facilities.

The City’s Storm Drain Master Plan is the primary local plan for accommodating stormwater and limiting flooding. Beyond that, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Irvine Ranch Water District, and County of Orange each operate and manage the risks of their respective dams and communicate with the City regarding emergency planning and testing.

Flooding can damage structures, disrupt transportation, and create indoor air quality issues such as mold growth. When recovering from flood damage, Costa Mesa’s renters and housing-cost-burdened residents may experience additional burdens related to cost or maintenance logistics. -42-
172
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 27

Figure 3-3. Federal Emergency Management Agency–Designated Flood Zones

Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2025. National Flood Hazard Layer. Accessed June 16, 2025. https://hazards-fema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id= 8b0adb51996444d4879338b5529aa9cd&extent=-95.45126763363174,29.70432951603742,-

95.44609633465032,29.70665923986828.

-43-
173
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 28

Wildfire
Wildfires are intense fires that generally ignite in wildlands but can cover large expanses of land and spread quickly to developed areas.

Projected Changes
The regional average of burned area is projected to remain relatively consistent with existing conditions. Factors such as continued warming and intensified drought can increase immediate wildfire risks, although available fuel may decrease over time due to intensified drought. It should also be noted that burned area projections apply across the broader region or county, but vegetation management of local open spaces can limit local risk.7 Santa Ana winds are another important wildfire factor, as they can intensify the spread of wildfires. These are strong, dry winds that blow from inland deserts out to the coast. Generally, these winds occur in late fall or winter. They are especially significant in Orange County, as 25% of wildfires in the region occur during Santa Ana wind events. Future trends for Santa Ana wind intensity and frequency are uncertain at this time and should be reviewed during future CAAP updates.8

7 State of California. 2018. “Los Angeles Region Report.” In California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment.

Accessed July 1, 2025. https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Reg%20Report-%20SUM-CCCA4- 2018-007%20LosAngeles_ADA.pdf.
8 State of California 2018, “Los Angeles Region Report.” -44-
174
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 29

Spatial Extent
Costa Mesa’s local wildfire risk emanates from the open space in the western and southwestern portions of the City near Talbert Park. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection designates Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZs), which signify elevated likelihood of fire hazard due to characteristics like vegetation, slope, and weather. Costa Mesa’s FHSZs can be seen on Figure 3-4, primarily covering open space but also overlapping with over 500 dwelling units of housing. Areas designated as High or Very High FHSZs are subject to certain California Building Code regulations related to ignition-resistant building materials for new development, and Very High FHSZs are also subject to defensible-space vegetation regulations.

Impacts

Wildfires have the potential to endanger community members, damage structures, trigger evacuations, and cause poor air quality.

As stated above, over 500 dwelling units are located within the City’s FHSZ.

These homes are most at risk, but wildfire conditions are variable and can still impact homes outside of the defined hazard zones. The City implements a Fire Prevention Program and other ongoing actions, such as vegetation management, to limit fire risk.

Regional wildfires can also impact Costa Mesa’s air quality through smoke.

The public health impacts of wildfire smoke are especially dangerous to older adults and people with existing respiratory or cardiovascular conditions. -45-
175
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 30

Figure 3-4. Fire Hazard Severity Zones

Source: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2025. Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/community-wildfire- preparedness-and-mitigation/fire-hazard-severity-zones.

-46-
176
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 31

Compounding Hazards
Compounding hazards occur when multiple climate-related hazards interact, leading to new or more intense impacts than a single hazard in isolation. The two compounding hazards identified for the City are debris flows and climate migration, which are summarized below.

Debris Flows
Debris flows, also known as mudslides, are a dangerous type of landslide that moves fast, carrying soil and debris and damaging objects in its path. Wildfire and drought can contribute to conditions that lead to debris flows by burning vegetation or causing vegetation to die off, leading to destabilized hillsides. When extreme precipitation follows these conditions, debris flows are more likely.

Debris flows have not yet occurred within the City. However, bluffs in the southwestern portion of the City have been identified as deep-seated landslide zones, which indicate slow-moving or dormant landslides.9 Some of these deep-seated landslide zones overlap with FHSZs, making these zones more susceptible to debris flows should a combination of a wildfire and extreme precipitation occur in these areas (see Figure 3-5). Pre-planning for this risk and building upon continued efforts outlined in the LHMP to prepare for emergency response, maintain drainage, and stabilize vegetation on and above landslide-prone areas can ensure an efficient and effective response.

9 City of Costa Mesa 2022, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. -47-
177
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 32

Figure 3-5. Deep-Seated Landslide Zones and Fire Hazard Severity Zones

Source: California Department of Conservation. 2019. California Landslide Inventory and Deep Landslide Susceptibility. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/california-landslide-inventory-and-deep- landslide-susceptiblity; CAL FIRE 2025, Fire Hazard Severity Zones.

-48-
178
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 33

Climate Migration
Climate migration happens when people move out of an area or home either because of specific major climate hazard events or long-term strain from climate hazards. Climate migration in the Southern California region is likely to occur as a result of damage from wildfires or flooding events, loss of insurance, or chronic issues like extreme heat, air quality issues, or regular flooding as a result of sea level rise.

Costa Mesa’s strong economy and relatively low exposure to climate hazards as compared to the region may make it an attractive destination for climate-displaced populations from other parts of Southern California. While this may bring economic opportunities, it could also exacerbate existing housing affordability pressures. Regional collaboration with agencies, like the Southern California Association of Governments, who establish Regional Housing Needs Allocations and direct various housing-related funds is necessary to collectively address this issue over time and limit negative impacts.

-49-
179
CHAPTER 3 CLIMATE ADAPTATION

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 34

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-50-
180

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 35 CHAPTER 4
Outreach and
Engagement
-51-
181

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 36 4 Outreach and Engagement
To ensure the CAAP reflects the needs and
priorities of Costa Mesa’s unique
community, meaningful engagement with
diverse community members and
stakeholders was essential. The plan was
shaped through a collaborative process
that included multiple opportunities for
input from City leadership, residents,
businesses, and key stakeholders.

This chapter provides an overview of the
public engagement strategy, summarizes
key themes identified through outreach,
and describes how community feedback
informed the final CAAP.

Outreach and Engagement Efforts
To enable participation from a diverse range of community members and interested parties in Costa Mesa, the City took a multipronged approach to outreach and engagement.

Opportunities for engagement included:
• A community open house including CAAP sectors and objectives • Pop-up outreach activities at well-attended public events • A community survey to solicit more in-depth feedback
• Internal working group meetings with relevant City departments to facilitate collaboration in the CAAP development process
• An external focus group with key interested parties
• Presentation and workshop with the Coastline Regional Occupation Program (ROP) Sustainability Cohort
• Site visits to Mesa Water District and the Orange County Water District Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS)
• Public City Council hearing to provide an update on the CAAP’s status and outreach • Digital engagement via social media, the City Hall Snapshot newsletter, and email blasts
• Flyers posted at City Hall, other City facilities, and coffee shops

INCLUSIVE OUTREACH EFFORTS
✓ Broad, accessible outreach
✓ English and Spanish materials
✓ Live language support at events
✓ Online + in-person participation
✓ Flexible times and locations
✓ Family-friendly activities
-52-
182
CHAPTER 4 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 37

Outreach and engagement touchpoints were scheduled to occur throughout key points in the planning process, ensuring lived experiences and local priorities informed each stage of the development of the CAAP, from background analysis to policy development and implementation. The timeline for outreach and engagement events is shown in Figure 4-1.

Figure 4-1. Outreach Timeline

Through in-person and online engagement activities, the City heard from more than 340 community members, whose feedback and input were invaluable for shaping each component of the plan. The following sections summarize each of the engagement touchpoints and their role in the outreach and engagement program. Detailed summaries of feedback received from the pop-up events, community survey, and community open house are available in Appendix C.

-53-
183
CHAPTER 4 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 38

[placeholder: InDesign page]

-54-
184
CHAPTER 4 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 39

Earth Day Event Pop-Ups
Two Earth Day pop-up/tabling events were
held—the first in the spring of 2025 and the
second in the spring of 2026—to build awareness
of the CAAP and receive input from community
members about their priorities and vision for a
more sustainable Costa Mesa.

The first Earth Day pop-up was held on Saturday,
April 26, 2025, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on the
City Hall lawn. Event attendees had the
opportunity to interact with City staff, read
educational poster boards, contribute their
vision for a more sustainable Costa Mesa on an
interactive community collage, and learn about
the community survey.

Over 65 participants provided comments on the
community collage that emphasized the need to
increase renewable energy sources; plant
additional trees and improve access to parks and
green spaces; and improve alternative
transportation options, such as biking, walking, and
public transit as a way to reduce carbon emissions.

The second Earth Day pop-up was held Saturday,
April 18, 2026, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., at the
same location. This pop-up focused on educating
the community about the CAAP and its benefits,
goals, and progress; informing community members
about potential CAAP objectives and actions; and
raising awareness for the community open house,
which was scheduled for Thursday, April 30, 2026,
from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
2025 Earth Day event collage
2025 Earth Day kid’s table
-55-
185
CHAPTER 4 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 40

Concert in the Park Pop-Up
The City conducted a pop-up outreach event at
the Costa Mesa Concert in the Park on Tuesday,
July 29, 2025, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at
Fairview Park. This event provided an opportunity
to engage community members in an informal,
family-friendly setting and expand awareness of
the CAAP.

The primary goals of the event were to raise
awareness about the City’s climate planning
efforts, communicate the objectives and benefits
of the CAAP, and gather community input to
better understand current barriers to sustainable
behaviors. Participants were also encouraged to
share their priorities and help build a shared
vision for a more sustainable Costa Mesa.

More than 40 community members
participated in the outreach activities,
providing valuable feedback that reinforced
key themes seen throughout the broader
engagement process. Participants expressed
strong interest in enhancing landscaping and
improving access to parks and green space,
expanding transportation options such as
biking, walking, and public transit, and
increasing efforts to compost and recycle to
reduce waste.

Concert in the Park pop-up
Kid’s activity drawing
Concert in the Park pop-up
-56-
186
CHAPTER 4 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 41

Community Surveys
The City conducted two online
community surveys to better understand
existing behaviors, community priorities,
and barriers to adopting more sustainable
practices. In total, 228 community survey
responses were received, of which 158
were fully completed.

To encourage broad participation, the
City offered both a long-form and
condensed survey format. The long-form
survey was available from April 22 to
October 3, 2025, while the condensed version was available from July 29 to October 3, 2025.

There were 31 responses received on the short-form survey during the first Earth Day Festival event, and 62 additional responses were received thereafter; 65 responses were received on the long-form survey.

Survey responses highlighted a range of common barriers to sustainable actions, including challenges related to walking, biking, and transit use; installing energy efficiency upgrades and renewable energy systems (such as solar photovoltaic [PV]); transitioning to drought- tolerant landscaping; implementing graywater and rainwater capture systems; and composting organic materials.

Internal Working Group
The City formed an internal working group and conducted four meetings (virtual and in-person) with the goal of grounding the CAAP in internal expertise, operational realities, and cross-departmental collaboration. The fifth internal working group meeting will be held upon completion of the Final CAAP and will focus on preparing City staff for successful plan implementation. In addition to the internal working group, as part of data collection for the municipal GHG emissions inventory, a commute survey for City employees was conducted to better understand commute habits.

Working group meetings were designed to engage internal City staff across departments in developing a coordinated and actionable CAAP. Through a series of structured meetings, staff were introduced to the CAAP’s purpose, goals, and timeline and were provided opportunities to review existing City policies, programs, and initiatives that support sustainability and resilience.

Screenshot of a portion of the community survey
-57-
187
CHAPTER 4 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 42

Discussions focused on identifying successful efforts, understanding implementation challenges such as resource constraints and coordination needs, and establishing priorities for future action.

As the process advanced, working group members contributed to shaping the CAAP’s strategy framework and reviewing draft actions to ensure they are feasible, aligned with departmental capacity, and effective. These meetings culminated in a comprehensive review of the draft CAAP, including implementation roles and next steps toward adoption.

External Focus Group
The external focus group meeting was designed to gather targeted input from businesses and key interested parties to help shape the CAAP. Participants included representatives from the building industry and real estate industry, local nonprofit organizations, an institution of higher education, and a regional electricity utility.

The meeting introduced the CAAP’s purpose, scope, and timeline, then invited participants to enter breakout rooms assigned to each participant’s sector: land use development, local organizations and advocacy, and utility partners. In these breakout rooms, participants shared their current successes and challenges related to implementing practices to reduce GHG emissions and/or improve resilience to climate impacts, and they also discussed opportunities for collaboration with the City to realize the goals of the CAAP. Feedback focused on identifying existing programs, barriers to implementation, and potential incentives that could better support local action.

Community Open House
A community open house was held on Thursday, April 30, 2026, from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., with approximately 30 community members in attendance. It was a joint event for the CAAP and the City’s General Plan Environmental Justice Policies Update, and engagement activities for
Community open house event
-58-
188
CHAPTER 4 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 43

both projects were incorporated. Distinct stations were prepared for the CAAP and the Environmental Justice Policies Update, each with educational materials, project staff to facilitate conversations, and opportunities to provide feedback on draft content.

CAAP stations included draft objectives and sample actions for each of the sectors of the CAAP, providing opportunities for community members to provide their input through brief comments as well as stickers that could be used to indicate priority.

Participants provided the largest number of comments on the following sectors: transportation, energy and the built environment, and natural and urban lands. Participants also indicated several transportation sector objectives as a priority.

Additional Targeted Outreach
The City conducted targeted outreach to facilitate discussion and input on the CAAP. The following sections summarize outreach efforts to the Coastline Regional Occupational Program Sustainability Cohort and Mesa Water District.

COASTLINE REGIONAL OCCUPATIONAL PROGRAM
The City conducted targeted outreach to the Coastline Regional Occupational Program Sustainability Cohort to engage younger residents and students in the CAAP process. City staff delivered a presentation introducing the CAAP and its goals. They also facilitated an interactive activity in which participants shared their input, via leaf-shaped comment cards tied to the community collage begun at the community open house, on what the CAAP’s analysis and actions should address. The session included 10 participants, consisting of both high school students and young adults, who were highly engaged and interested in sustainability topics. Key themes from their feedback included the importance of improving public transportation, enhancing walkability, and expanding green space.

MESA WATER DISTRICT
The City conducted a site visit and tour of Mesa Water District on March 25, 2026, to better understand the agency’s ongoing sustainability initiatives and coordinate efforts for the CAAP.

During the tour, district staff highlighted a range of programs and practices, including water conservation initiatives, public outreach and education programs, use of recycled water, system efficiency improvements, and efforts to reduce energy use in operations. -59-
189
CHAPTER 4 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 44

City staff also provided an overview of the CAAP’s purpose and scope, facilitating a collaborative discussion on how water-related strategies could align with existing district efforts. This coordination helped ensure that the CAAP’s proposed actions related to water conservation and wastewater management are realistic, complementary, and reflective of practices already being implemented by Mesa Water District.

ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
City staff toured the Orange County Water
District’s GWRS facility on March 25, 2026. The
GWRS is a joint project of the Orange County
Water District and Orange County Sanitation
District. The facility provides enough new water
for up to 1 million residents, making it the largest
advanced water purification system for
potable reuse in the world.

During the facility tour, City staff learned about
the role of the GWRS facility in replenishing
groundwater resources, received detailed
information about the treatment process, and
were guided through the facility to observe operations and water quality monitoring. This site visit informed the City about current regional efforts to conserve water supplies and reduce reliance on imported water.

City staff tour of the GWRS
-60-
190
CHAPTER 4 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 45

ESTANCIA HIGH SCHOOL COMMUNITY E-BIKE SKILLS WORKSHOP
On August 7, 2025, City staff hosted a pop-up at the
Estancia High School Community E-Bike Skills Workshop
to engage students and their families on climate action and sustainable transportation. The event provided an
opportunity to share information about the CAAP’s
goals, key focus areas, and anticipated strategies.

During the workshop, participants learned about the
benefits of e-bikes as a clean transportation alternative while City staff facilitated informal discussions to gather input on community priorities, barriers to adopting
active transportation, and ideas for improving bike
infrastructure and safety. Attendees were encouraged
to take the community survey.

BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
Following the external focus group meeting, the City held a follow-up discussion with the Building Industry Association of Southern California on January 14, 2025. The purpose of the meeting was to gain a better understanding of the building industry's experience with current development practices and the feasibility of common GHG reduction and adaptation measures, including implementation challenges, technological considerations, and other barriers, as well as areas where they have been able to advance sustainable goals and practices. Discussion topics included EV charging infrastructure, energy performance standards, renewable energy generation and storage, zero-emission off-road equipment, end- of-trip bicycle facilities, indoor and outdoor water conservation strategies, and nature-based climate solutions. The meeting provided an opportunity for open dialogue, allowing Building Industry Association representatives to ask questions, share perspectives, and provide feedback on their experience with industry-standard climate action and adaptation strategies, as well as finding ways to collaborate on sustainable efforts now and in the future.

E-Bike Skills Workshop
-61-
191
CHAPTER 4 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 46

Digital Engagement
To build awareness of and encourage
meaningful participation in the CAAP, the
City developed a dedicated project
webpage that serves as a central hub for
information and engagement
opportunities. The webpage includes
detailed content such as the project
timeline, key milestones, and clear
explanations of how community members
can get involved at each stage of the
process. It also features frequently asked
questions to address common inquiries,
along with summaries of engagement
activities and input gathered to date, helping to keep the public informed and demonstrate how feedback is being incorporated.

To ensure broad and inclusive outreach, the City created and distributed materials in both English and Spanish. These materials were shared through multiple communication channels and formats, including content on the City’s official website and features in the City’s e- newsletter, as well as social media. Social media outreach included Instagram reels, a Let’s Talk Costa Mesa interview feature on the City’s YouTube channel, and posts, reels, and stories on multiple social media platforms to boost engagement leading up to major public events, such as Earth Day, the close of the community survey, and the community open house. Cumulatively, social media content reached more than 9,000 people.

This coordinated outreach effort was intended to increase visibility of the CAAP process, provide accessible information, and create multiple touchpoints for community members to stay informed and participate.

Screenshot of City’s CAAP webpage
-62-
192

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 47

CHAPTER 5
Climate Action and
Adaptation Strategy
-63-
193

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 48 5 Climate Action and Adaptation Strategy
Chapter 5 provides the CAAP strategy for achieving the City’s climate action and adaptation goals. The strategy is organized within a tiered framework and serves as a roadmap to help the City achieve its GHG emissions reduction goals, as outlined in Chapter 2, and ensure the City is prepared for the climate change–induced hazards discussed in Chapter 3. The strategy advances a vision of a climate-ready, resilient future for Costa Mesa through a series of targeted actions that, together, build momentum toward transformative, citywide transitions.

Costa Mesa’s Climate-Ready Future
Through implementation of the CAAP strategy, Costa Mesa’s future will build upon existing sustainability efforts (see Chapter 1) and further take shape as a cleaner, more efficient, and more connected community, one that reflects the cumulative impact of many coordinated actions driving meaningful, citywide transitions. Over time, these efforts will reshape how residents live, move, and interact with their environment, embedding resilience and sustainability into everyday life.

In this climate-ready future, getting around
Costa Mesa will continue to evolve. Streets
become quieter and cleaner as EVs replace
gasoline-powered cars, supported by an
expanding reliable, citywide charging
network. At the same time, reliance on driving
alone is reduced. Walkable neighborhoods,
enhanced transit, and shared mobility options
make it easier to choose alternatives,
reducing congestion and contributing to a
more livable urban environment.

Homes and buildings evolve through steady improvements in efficiency and energy use.

Across Costa Mesa, buildings consume less energy, reduce waste, and transition to renewable energy sources. Residents and businesses benefit from efficient spaces that operate with lower costs and emissions. These incremental upgrades collectively drive a broader transformation of the built environment toward long-term sustainability.

Water is used more wisely, building on existing conservation efforts, with homes and landscapes designed for efficiency in a changing climate. Drought-tolerant landscaping, -64-
194
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 49

water reuse systems, and smart irrigation continue to be adopted and become standard, helping the City reduce its environmental impact while strengthening resilience to water scarcity.

Waste is reduced and the amount generated is increasingly managed as a resource, reflecting ongoing progress in recycling and diversion programs. Recycling and composting become standard practices citywide, dramatically reducing what ends up in landfills and minimizing methane emissions.

At the same time, construction, landscaping, and other off-road equipment activities progress to using efficient electric equipment, further reducing emissions and improving local air quality.

Green spaces expand and improve
across Costa Mesa, reflecting ongoing
investment in nature-based solutions.

Trees, parks, and urban landscapes
enhance quality of life while capturing
carbon and cooling neighborhoods.

These improvements, implemented
over time, complement emissions
reductions while making
neighborhoods healthier and
more vibrant.

Equally important is the strength of the community itself. Costa Mesa’s future builds on our strong community engagement, where residents, especially those most vulnerable to climate impacts, are informed, supported, and actively engaged. Partnerships with local organizations, businesses, and schools help drive innovation and build a shared culture of sustainability. Cooling centers, outreach programs, and new resilience initiatives ensure that the community can withstand and adapt to climate challenges.

The City also plays a critical leadership role by advancing progress within its own operations.

By expanding renewable energy solutions, improving efficiency, and embedding sustainable practices, the City demonstrates how incremental changes can collectively drive broader transitions across the community.

Together, these changes and expanded efforts tell the story of a Costa Mesa that is not just reducing GHG emissions but continuing to advance itself as a sustainable, resilient, and -65-
195
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 50

forward-looking community, one where environmental responsibility and quality of life go hand in hand well beyond 2045.

Tiered Framework
To achieve Costa Mesa’s climate-ready future, the roadmap for the CAAP is organized within a tiered framework to ensure a manageable, organized approach. The CAAP’s tiered framework includes three main components: sectors, objectives, and actions. • Sectors are the first tier and reflect
the main GHG emission source and
adaptation sectors where meaningful
change can be made.
• Objectives are the second tier of the
implementation framework and are
contained within each sector to
further define the specific goals.
• Actions are the final tier of the
implementation framework and
include specific policies, programs,
plans, initiatives, or tools that will be
deployed to achieve the expressed
goals of the related objective
and sector.

Sectors
The CAAP includes eight sectors, which represent the broad categories for enacting climate action and adaptation within Costa Mesa. The sectors largely align with the emission sectors presented in Chapter 2 and provide the focus areas for the CAAP’s overall strategy. The eight sectors are as follows, with their letter code noted in parentheses:
• On-Road Transportation (T)
• Energy and Buildings (E)
• Water and Wastewater (W)
• Solid Waste (SW)
• Off-Road Equipment (OR)
• Natural and Urban Lands (NU)
• People and Community (PC)
• Municipal (M)
-66-
196
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 51

Objectives
Objectives set clear, measurable goals for each sector. They define priority climate mitigation and adaptation outcomes, organized around shared approaches to reducing emissions and strengthening resilience. Objectives are implemented through specific, actionable measures, with performance metrics tracked at the measure level where applicable.

Actions
Each objective includes actions that specify the steps the City will take to implement it.

Actions are the discrete tasks that, taken together, deliver the measure and advance the CAAP’s goals. As such, actions outline how the City will carry out the work needed to achieve these broader objectives.

At the action level, a range of tools is used to drive change, and the CAAP integrates a balanced mix of action types to achieve its climate goals. These action types include:

Education/Marketing Efforts to increase awareness and address knowledge gaps (e.g., technical assistance programs, marketing materials)
Incentives Tools to encourage voluntary behavior change (e.g., subsidies, recognition, process streamlining)
Infrastructure Upgrades or installation of physical systems or facilities to achieve goals (e.g., transit improvements, renewable energy installations) Investment/Funding Efforts to secure or allocate financial resources to implement CAAP actions (e.g., pursue grant funding, bonds, special taxes) Partnerships Coordinated efforts between the City and other parties to achieve collective goals (e.g., school programs, corporate vanshare) Plan/Program Identification of next steps, or development of a City service, good, or operational change
Regulations Mechanisms to enforce required behavior change (e.g., ordinances, rules)

-67-
197
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 52

Each sector summary page shows the sector’s share of the community inventory, where applicable. For sectors that do not contribute to—or were not included in—the community GHG inventory, emissions are not displayed on their summary page.

Co-Benefits
Each sector summary page identifies the co-benefits associated with its actions. Co-benefits are the positive, indirect outcomes of climate strategies that support broader community goals, such as improved health, environmental quality, mobility, and economic vitality.

Co-benefits were introduced in Chapter 1 and are briefly summarized here for reference. The legend below provides a visual guide to the categories used throughout this chapter; please refer to Chapter 1 for additional detail on each co-benefit category and how they are defined.

Ways to Contribute
Each sector sheet highlights ways that community members can contribute on an individual level to achieving the City’s GHG emission reduction and resilience goals. While this list is not exhaustive, it includes ideas and inspiration for how residents, businesses, and others can support emissions reduction efforts and help advance the community’s CAAP goals.

-68-
198
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 53

On-Road Transportation

-69-
199
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 54

Energy and Buildings

-70-
200
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 55

Water and Wastewater

-71-
201
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 56

Solid Waste

-72-
202
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 57

Off-Road Equipment

-73-
203
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 58

Natural and Urban Lands

-74-
204
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 59

People and Community

-75-
205
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 60

Municipal

-76-
206
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 61

20 Actions in 2 Years
Achieving Costa Mesa’s climate mitigation and adaptation goals requires sustained effort across multiple sectors and timelines. The CAAP outlines a comprehensive set of 106 actions to be implemented between now and 2045, with a significant portion targeted for completion by 2030 to align with near-term emissions reduction milestones.

To focus City resources and accelerate progress, the City is prioritizing an initial set of “20 Actions in 2 Years.” This focused approach highlights key early actions that can be kickstarted early on and are achievable in the near term while delivering meaningful GHG reductions and advancing climate resilience. These priority actions reflect the goals of City leadership, opportunities for measurable impact, and foundational steps that support broader implementation of the CAAP over time.

The 20 priority actions to initiate within the first 2 years of CAAP implementation are highlighted in the comprehensive action list in Table 5-1 below. These priority actions will carry momentum forward from CAAP adoption to full realization in 2045.

Comprehensive Action List
A comprehensive list of the CAAP Sectors, Objectives, and Actions are provided in Table 5.1.

Additional details regarding implementation of these actions are included in Appendix E. The “20 actions in 2 years” actions are noted with green shading.

Table 5-1. Sectors, Objectives, and Actions
Objective Action Type
On-Road Transportation
T1. Transition to
Electric Vehicles
a. Develop a citywide education program that
educates residents and businesses on the
advantages of EVs.

Education/
Marketing
b. Install EV charging stations at nonresidential public parking areas.

Infrastructure
c. Partner with regional agencies (e.g., Orange
County Transportation Authority, South Coast Air
Quality Management District) to co-promote EV
infrastructure incentives for buildings.

Partnerships
d. Host EV-ready building roundtables with local
builders, architects, and contractors to highlight
best practices and available funding sources.

Education/
Marketing
-77-
207
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 62

Table 5-1. Sectors, Objectives, and Actions
Objective Action Type
e. Develop and implement a communitywide zero-
emission-vehicle action plan to guide strategic EV
charging deployment; assess upgrade needs and
grid capacity; evaluate public charging corridors;
support the transition of light-, medium-, and heavy-
duty fleets; and expand equitable access to zero-
emission-vehicle transportation.

Plan/Program
f. Apply for state grants to fund the installation of EV chargers.

Investment/Funding
g. Promote voluntary upgrades of electric plug-in
infrastructure for Transport Refrigeration Units and
Auxiliary Power Units at loading docks through
incentives, technical assistance, pilot projects,
and/or partnerships with utilities and regional
agencies.

Plan/Program
T2. Promote
Walking and Biking
a. Explore bicycle parking requirements that
incentivize or allow for shared bicycle parking hubs.

Partnerships
b. Implement the Pedestrian Master Plan and Active
Transportation Plan to identify pedestrian, bicycle,
and roadway circulation gaps and opportunities;
update existing plans and the zoning code as
needed to support active transportation, including
tiered bike facilities and amenities on private
property based on development scale.

Infrastructure
c. Continue to explore feasibility and identification of corridors with excess roadway capacity, such as
South Coast Drive, and consider reducing the
number of vehicle lanes to improve safety and
provide space for bicyclists, pedestrians, transit
amenities, landscaping, or parklets.

Plan/Program
T3. Reduce Single-
Occupancy
Vehicle Trips
a. Develop voluntary citywide commute trip reduction
program for employers to opt in that provides
active travel options to/from work (e.g., carpool,
transit, walking/biking).

Plan/Program
b. Via marketing campaigns building on current
efforts, continue to educate the community on
travel options for commuters to reduce commute
trips.

Education/
Marketing
c. Develop program to facilitate ridesharing/
carpooling for employees.

Plan/Program
d. Review and explore reducing parking minimums,
consistent with AB 2097, while maintaining City
flexibility to manage parking impacts through tools
such as shared parking, valet parking, and other
parking management strategies.

Regulations
-78-
208
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 63

Table 5-1. Sectors, Objectives, and Actions
Objective Action Type
e. Offer impact-fee credits for multifamily residential projects that voluntarily unbundle residential
parking costs from property costs.

Incentives
T4. Increase Public
Transportation Use
a. Develop program for residents and/or employees
to receive subsidized/discounted transit passes.

Plan/Program
b. Expand the Let’s Go Costa Mesa voucher program
to support local transit services.

Plan/Program
c. Continue working with Orange County Transit
Authority to monitor ridership and focus available
resources for efficient frequency of transit service.

Partnerships
d. Continue to construct roadway improvements to
improve transit service and reliability, including
boarding islands, queue jump lanes, transit signal
priority, dedicated transit lanes, business access or
transit lanes, and enhanced bus stops, and work
with Orange County Transit Authority to pursue
support of capital projects, where feasible.

Infrastructure
e. Work with the Newport–Mesa Unified School District
to enhance and coordinate school bus programs
within the school districts serving Costa Mesa, as
feasible, with a focus on providing service for
middle and high school students living in low-
income neighborhoods.

Partnerships
T5. Support Smart
Growth
a. Implement rezoning efforts, such as the
Neighborhoods Where We All Belong plan, that
allow for increased residential and job density.

Regulations
b. Explore potential incentives for mixed-use
development within 0.5 miles of major transit
stations and priority transit-oriented development
corridors, especially the Fairview Road corridor, by
examining benefits such as expedited permitting,
height incentives, density/floor area ratio bonuses,
and targeted infrastructure improvements that
support walkability and transit access.

Incentives
c. Continue to implement the City’s Inclusionary
Housing Ordinance, which incentivizes and/or
requires the inclusion of below-market-rate or
affordable units.

Incentives
Energy and Buildings
E1. Reduce Energy
Demand in
Buildings
a. Support energy audits for homes and businesses
through partnership with the Green Business
Program, providing resources, technical assistance,
and targeted social media outreach and
collateral.

Education/
Marketing
-79-
209
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 64

Table 5-1. Sectors, Objectives, and Actions
Objective Action Type
b. Partner with utilities to connect property owners
with available rebates and discounted energy-
efficient appliances, supported by targeted social
media outreach and collateral.

Partnerships
c. Seek grants to offer incentives for passive cooling
and heating systems (such as cool roofs and walls)
during roof replacements or renovations.

Investment/Funding
E2. Decarbonize
Building Energy Use
a. Explore providing incentives for projects that
commit to installing all zero-emission appliances,
such as expedited plan review (e.g., accelerated
10-day timeline).

Incentives
b. Promote and facilitate existing rebate vouchers for
gas-to-electric swaps during permitted remodels.

Incentives
c. Provide education and technical assistance on
gas-to-electric appliance swaps, highlighting
economic and health benefits and addressing
common concerns through demonstrations.

Education/
Marketing
d. Develop and implement a Green Builder Program
to highlight and honor green builders in the
community.

Plan/Program
E3. Increase
Carbon-Free
Energy Supply
a. Offer voluntary development incentives (e.g., fee
reductions, dedicated staff review, expedited
processing) for projects that incorporate on-site
renewable energy systems capable of producing
at least 95% of total annual load.

Incentives
b. Provide education and technical assistance for
paired solar and battery systems.

Education/
Marketing
c. Consider joining Orange County Power Authority, or
other clean energy provider or program, and
launch a voluntary clean energy enrollment
support program that uses targeted outreach,
community partnerships, and incentives such as bill-
savings comparisons, enrollment assistance, and
recognition or rebate-style perks to encourage
households and businesses to opt into the 100%
renewable energy tier.

Partnerships
d. Identify areas where grid infrastructure upgrades
are needed to meet the City’s existing and future
decarbonization, transportation, and building
electrification needs in coordination with Southern
California Edison and other potential future electric
utilities.

Infrastructure
-80-
210
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 65

Table 5-1. Sectors, Objectives, and Actions
Objective Action Type
Water and Wastewater
W1. Reduce Water
Use
a. Continue to establish drought-tolerant landscape
demonstration sites in public rights-of-way. Promote
these practices with an educational campaign
using virtual tours to showcase locally appropriate
designs, plant combinations, and irrigation best
practices.

Plan/Program
b. Promote existing Mesa Water District (rebates for
water-efficient appliances across new and existing
development by training City staff and using City
communication channels, including the website,
social media, utility bills, and permitting
touchpoints, to direct residents and developers to
available Mesa Water District programs.

Education/
Marketing
c. Develop and promote a voluntary drought-tolerant
landscape resource program that provides design
templates, native plant palettes, and irrigation best
practice guidance tailored to the City’s climate to
support residents, landlords, and businesses in
transitioning to low-water landscapes.

Plan/Program
W2. Increase
Water Reuse
a. Educate residents on the benefits and practical
applications of rain barrels and gray-water systems
for landscape irrigation through hands-on
workshops, step-by-step installation guides, and
demonstrations of appropriate plants, irrigation
layouts, maintenance practices, and pest
management.

Education/
Marketing
b. Promote rebates or provide financial assistance for
homeowners to install rain barrels and gray-water
systems by offering rebates for system design and
installation.

Investment/Funding
c. Evaluate feasibility of recycled water for residential and commercial irrigation in partnership with Mesa
Water District.

Plan/Program
Solid Waste
SW1. Reduce
Waste Generation
a. Maintain construction and demolition waste
diversion per CALGreen. During annual budgeting,
consider anticipated development and adjust
staffing and/or cross-train staff accordingly to
respond to increased need for construction and
demolition inspections.

Incentives
b. Develop a facilitation program that connects local
reuse yards and nonprofits with contractors
interested in building deconstruction, helping
coordinate the collection, sorting, and resale of
salvaged materials.

Plan/Program
-81-
211
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 66

Table 5-1. Sectors, Objectives, and Actions
Objective Action Type
c. Evaluate the potential to offer cost-effective bulk
composting to residents.

Incentives
d. As part of Parks and Community Services
afterschool program, teach students proper waste
sorting and composting.

Partnerships
e. In conjunction with franchise waste haulers,
continue to provide multiunit and commercial
properties with clear waste sorting guidance.

Education/
Marketing
f. Build partnerships and assess the feasibility of an
urban wood-reuse program.

Partnerships
g. Share information with the community, including
through the City’s website, on proper e-waste
disposal, reuse and repair resources, donation and
material exchange programs, community swap
events, and other waste reduction programs and
resources, as available.

Education/
Marketing
Off -Road Equipment
OR1. Accelerate
Zero-Emission Off-
Road Equipment
Adoption
a. Promote the transition from gas- and diesel-
powered landscaping equipment to zero-emission
models among residents and businesses by
providing resources on the City’s website, including
information about the South Coast Air Quality
Management District Residential Electric Lawn
Mower Rebate Program and the Commercial
Electric Lawn and Garden Equipment Exchange
Program.

Education/
Marketing
b. Support adoption of zero-emission off-road
equipment during construction by promoting
contractors who have zero-emission off-road
equipment within their fleet.

Incentives
c. Establish a voluntary zero-emission off-road
equipment transition program that helps
contractors and landscaping companies evaluate
electric equipment, access available incentives,
and participate in field testing or demonstration
events.

Plan/Program
Natural and Urban Lands
NU1. Increase
Carbon
Sequestration
through Urban
Greening
a. Build upon and implement the City’s Urban Canopy
and Land Assessment to encourage equitable tree
canopy expansions and native plantings.

Infrastructure
b. Educate the community on carbon sequestration
and on native and drought-tolerant landscaping
through informative materials and exposure to
ongoing campaigns and organizations.

Education/
Marketing
-82-
212
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 67

Table 5-1. Sectors, Objectives, and Actions
Objective Action Type
c. Continue to offer the parkway tree planting
program.

Plan/Program
d. Promote Low Impact Development10 and nature-
based solutions such as bioswales, shaded parking,
permeable surfaces, and green roofs.

Education/
Marketing
e. Partner with schools and community organizations
to implement green schoolyards, urban farms, rain
gardens, and tree plantings. Provide urban
greening education as part of Parks and
Community Services after-school programs.

Partnerships
f. Consider demand for additional community
garden plots. If new plots are desired, prioritize sites in disadvantaged neighborhoods.

Infrastructure
g. Establish a voluntary urban greening incentive
program that offers rebates or grants for tree
planting, shade-creating vegetation, and climate-
appropriate landscaping on private property,
prioritizing multifamily residences and heat-
vulnerable neighborhoods.

Incentives
h. Amend the municipal code to limit the removal of
mature trees and incorporate tree and
landscaping replacement standards.

Regulations
People and Community
PC1. Prepare
Community
Members for
Hazards
a. Educate community members about the health
risks of extreme heat and wildfire smoke and the
resources available during these hazard events. Use
communication methods, such as social media,
that reach a broad audience in addition to
targeted campaigns that reach older adults and
people experiencing homelessness, such as
handouts at key locations like the Senior Center or
Bridge Shelter.

Education/
Marketing
b. Share resources and facilitate discussions with local landscaping and construction businesses and
outdoor sports leagues to prevent heat illness.

Education/
Marketing
c. Continue to educate property owners on Fire
Hazard Severity Zone requirements and regulations.

Education/
Marketing
d. Promote agency cost assistance programs for
utilities, air purifiers, or similar programs as they
become available.

Education/
Marketing

10 Low Impact Development is an approach to site design and stormwater management that mimics natural hydrology by infiltrating, filtering, storing, evaporating, and detaining runoff close to where it falls. Unlike traditional systems that convey runoff away, Low Impact Development reduces runoff volume and improves water quality by maintaining near-pre-development conditions. -83-
213
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 68

Table 5-1. Sectors, Objectives, and Actions
Objective Action Type
PC2. Limit Hazard
Impacts
a. Develop facility plans to increase the accessibility of public spaces as cooling centers when
necessary. Consider the potential for pre-planned
programming, expanded hours, and temporary
spaces for pets.

Plan/Program
b. Consider the incorporation of recreational water
features, such as splash pads, during park master
planning and infrastructure updates.

Infrastructure
c. Continue to conduct feasibility assessments for solar and battery backup systems at key critical facilities
within the City, prioritizing public facilities that do not already have backup power, such as the City
community centers and Senior Center.

Infrastructure
d. Continue to regularly review cool and permeable
pavement technology effectiveness and consider
incorporating pilot programs into City maintenance
and capital improvement plan programs.

Infrastructure
e. Continue to coordinate with the Costa Mesa Fire
Department for development plan review.

Plan/Program
f. Continue to conduct regular vegetation
management activities to reduce fire hazard risks in
parks, open spaces, rights-of-way, and other areas
where vegetation could become fuel for fires.

Infrastructure
g. Pre-plan for post-wildfire debris flow potential. Plan/Program PC3. Build City and
Regional Capacity
for CAAP
Implementation
a. Hold quarterly working meetings with City staff to
facilitate CAAP implementation.

Investment/Funding
b. Include staff time in annual budgets for CAAP
funding pursuits.

Investment/Funding
c. Prioritize grant pursuits that benefit low-income
households, small local businesses, and the City’s
disadvantaged communities.

Investment/Funding
d. Coordinate with the following agencies on dam
operational planning and related flood risks:
▪ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles
District
▪ Irvine Ranch Water District
▪ County of Orange
Partnerships
e. Communicate with the County of Orange and City
of Newport Beach during their sea-level-rise
planning and mitigation efforts and contribute
public comments when appropriate.

Partnerships
f. Continue to provide support and planning input for
the City’s water and energy providers’ efforts to
provide safe, cost-effective, and reliable water and
energy.

Partnerships
-84-
214
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 69

Table 5-1. Sectors, Objectives, and Actions
Objective Action Type
g. Participate in discussions with the Southern
California Association of Governments and the
Orange County Council of Governments regarding
regional climate migration planning.

Partnerships
PC4. Foster Local
Sustainable
Practices
a. Market less-carbon-intensive practices and
resources, including natural and sustainably
sourced building materials (when feasible), to
residents and promote responsible consumption.

Education/
Marketing
b. Reassess the City’s Green Business Program,
outlining the existing process and benefits;
considering adjustments to the marketing,
certification process, or incentives offered;
weighing the benefits of possible expansions to the
program; and identifying staff and budgetary
needs.

Incentives
c. Assess the feasibility and desire for cooling centers hosted by businesses and local organizations.

Feasibility considerations should include legal
implications, existing City programs that could
incorporate this initiative (such as the Green
Business Program), and incentives for participating
organizations. If determined to be feasible, develop
the initiative.

Plan/Program
d. Engage with education providers such as Coastline
ROP and Newport–Mesa Unified School District to
advance local green industry workforce
opportunities.

Partnerships
e. Engage local non-governmental organizations and
compile a list relative to their interests and
capabilities on a variety of topics related to climate
action and adaptation, such as distributing related
news or grant opportunities, or participating in or
facilitating volunteer events such as cleanups or
tree plantings.

Partnerships
Municipal
M1. Reduce City
Vehicle Emissions
a. Develop and implement a municipal fleet zero-
emission transition plan that evaluates the
implications for vehicle transition and prioritizes
purchasing, phasing, EV charging infrastructure
appropriately based on feasibility and availability,
and considers other electric vehicles like e-bikes
and e-scooters.

Plan/Program
b. Transition the City’s non-emergency light-duty
gasoline- and diesel-powered fleet to EVs, with
exceptions for emergency and life safety vehicles.

Infrastructure
-85-
215
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 70

Table 5-1. Sectors, Objectives, and Actions
Objective Action Type
c. Install EV charging stations at City facilities to
facilitate the use of City-owned EVs.

Infrastructure
d. Implement a voluntary commute trip reduction
program, including providing commute trip
reduction marketing materials to City employees.

Plan/Program
e. Continue to promote employee use of the Let’s Go
Costa Mesa rideshare service and consider
expansions or regional partnerships.

Plan/Program
f. Implement an employee EV incentive program. Plan/Program M2. Reduce City
Energy Use
a. Continue to conduct energy audits of existing City
buildings and facilities at regular intervals to
determine energy-saving opportunities.

Plan/Program
b. Implement energy-efficiency retrofits of existing
City-owned buildings and facilities, based on the
results of energy audits.

Infrastructure
c. Require new City facilities to be all-electric (i.e., no natural gas) where feasible. Coordinate with the
Office of Emergency Management to incorporate
fail-safe measures for electrical outages, such as
backup power.

Infrastructure
d. During major redevelopment of existing City-owned
buildings, retrofit facilities to remove natural gas
and install all-electric end uses (where feasible).

Coordinate with the Office of Emergency
Management to incorporate fail-safe measures for
electrical outages, such as backup power.

Regulations
e. Install solar PV systems as shade structures at City- owned parking lots and facilities.

Infrastructure
f. Include solar panel installation and cool roofs in the design of all new City-owned buildings, where
feasible.

Infrastructure
g. During roof replacements, retrofit City-owned
buildings and facilities to include PV solar and cool
roofs where feasible.

Regulations
h. Install battery energy storage systems at key City
facilities to supplement PV solar.

Infrastructure
i. Pursue participation in Orange County Power
Authority or another available Community Choice
Aggregator to enroll municipal energy accounts in
a 100%-renewable-energy procurement program.

Partnerships
j. Develop a microgrid feasibility plan for City-owned
emergency response and critical facilities.

Plan/Program
-86-
216
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 71

Table 5-1. Sectors, Objectives, and Actions
Objective Action Type
M3. Zero-Emission
Off-Road and
Landscaping
Equipment
a. Transition City-owned landscaping equipment to
zero-emission, as feasible. Continue to contract with
landscape maintenance contractors who use zero-
emission equipment, as feasible.

Infrastructure
b. At replacement and as commercially available,
transition City-owned and -contracted fossil-fueled
off-road equipment used during construction or
operation to zero-emission.

Infrastructure
c. Accelerate replacement of diesel- or natural-gas-
powered backup generators at City facilities to
zero-emission options.

Infrastructure
M4. Reduce City
Facility Water Use
a. Continue to require use of water-efficient
appliances in new City buildings.

Regulations
b. Upgrade existing City buildings with water-efficient appliances during renovations or when funding
allows.

Infrastructure
c. When funding allows, replace non-programmed
turf at City-owned buildings and facilities with
native, drought-tolerant landscaping. Consider
creative opportunities for turf replacement, such as
volunteer events and local organization
partnerships.

Infrastructure
d. When available, pursue grants to install gray-water
systems at City-owned buildings and facilities.

Infrastructure
M5. Reduce City-
Generated Solid
Waste
a. Develop guidelines for food waste prevention
planning for City food service operations and large
events at City facilities.

Plan/Program
b. Evaluate opportunities to revise and expand the
City’s Sustainable Purchasing Policy to minimize
waste, including the use of single-use plastics,
paper, and other disposable or nonrecyclable
materials.

Plan/Program

Achieving Climate Goals
The City will work to reduce GHG emissions in line with State targets while enhancing resilience to climate change. Costa Mesa has established target GHG emissions levels of 553,029 MT CO₂e by 2030 and 114,190 MT CO₂e by 2045, which requires achieving a local reduction of 154,711 MT CO₂e by 2030 and 198,642 MT CO₂e by 2030 by 2045. Progress toward these goals will be driven by six key sectors: On-Road Transportation, Energy and Buildings, Off-Road Equipment, Water and Wastewater, Solid Waste, and Municipal Operations. Efforts in the -87-
217
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 72

Natural and Urban Lands sector will complement these reductions by increasing carbon sequestration—capturing and storing CO₂ in vegetation and soils.

Achieving the necessary reductions to reach the State-aligned targets will require a significant and sustained effort. Although many of the actions included in the CAAP strategy are non- regulatory, they are supported by programs, incentives, and resources designed to encourage behavior change. Success will depend on strong community participation, including residents and businesses choosing to adopt more sustainable practices and behaviors over time.

With sustained effort and ongoing evaluation to ensure actions are achieving their intended outcomes and supporting behavioral change (i.e., all performance metrics are achieved), energy and building strategies can deliver approximately 41% of total emissions reductions needed in 2030, while on-road transportation contributes around 53% of 2030 reductions.

Looking ahead to 2045, as the State’s electricity grid achieves full reliance on renewable energy, transportation-related reductions will continue to be the dominant contributor, representing about 58% of total reductions. Energy-focused measures will remain important, accounting for roughly 26% of reductions, primarily through the transition away from natural gas. Table 5-2 summarizes the City’s community-wide objectives, underlying performance assumptions, and corresponding GHG reduction outcomes for 2030 and 2045 for actions that result in quantifiable reductions.11 As shown, the City is positioned to meet its 2030 and 2045 GHG reduction targets, provided all performance metrics are achieved. Additional details are provided in Appendix D.

Table 5-2. Community Greenhouse Gas Reduction Summary
Objective
Performance Indicators
GHG Reductions (MT
CO2e)
Metric 2030 2045 2030 2045
On-Road Transportation Sector
T1: Transition to
Electric Vehicles*
Targeted

BEV/PHEV
population %
25% 30% 84,970 115,216

11 Some actions were not quantified in due to limitations in data availability or calculation methodologies.

However, future improvements in data and methods may enable the quantification of these actions at a later date.
-88-
218
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 73

Table 5-2. Community Greenhouse Gas Reduction Summary
Objective
Performance Indicators
GHG Reductions (MT
CO2e)
Metric 2030 2045 2030 2045
T2: Promote Walking
and Biking*
Provide secure
bike parking
and repair
stations
At all new
workplaces
At all new
workplaces
99 64
Fill sidewalk gap
identified in
Pedestrian
Master Plan
Opportunity
Zones
25% of
sidewalk
gaps
50% of
sidewalk
gaps
Fill proposed
bicycle facility
length identified
in Active
Transportation
Plan
15% of
bicycle
facility length
50% of
bicycle
facility
length
T3: Reduce Single-
Occupancy Vehicle
Trips
Provide
voluntary
commute trip
reduction
programs for
employees in
City
2% of
employees in
City
2%
employees
in City
258 114
Implement
commute trip
reduction
marketing
2% of
employees in
City
2% of
employees
in City
Provide
rideshare
program for
employees in
City
2% of
employees in
City
2% of
employees
in City
T4: Increase Public
Transportation Use*
Implement
subsidized
transit voucher
For 2.5% of
residents in
City
For 2.5% of
residents in
City
398 158
-89-
219
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 74

Table 5-2. Community Greenhouse Gas Reduction Summary
Objective
Performance Indicators
GHG Reductions (MT
CO2e)
Metric 2030 2045 2030 2045
Increase school
bus
neighborhood
coverage
By 10% By 10%
Increase transit
route coverage
in Costa Mesa
By 10% (6.2
miles)
By 10% (6.2
miles)
Increase transit
frequency
By 20%
across 50% of
routes/
service hours
By 20%
across 50%
of routes/
service
hours
Implement
transit-
supportive
roadway
improvements
On 15% of
transit routes
in Costa
Mesa
On 15% of
transit
routes in
Costa
Mesa
T5: Support Smart
Growth
Reductions accounted for in ABAU forecasted emissions
Energy and the Built Environment Sector
E1: Reduce Energy
Demand in Buildings
% of households
replacing
appliances with

ENERGY STAR
50% — 1,633 —
% of households
that install cool
roofs
50% single
family
25%
multifamily
—
E2: Decarbonize
Building Energy Use*
% of new
development
all-electric
20% 30% 25,331 52,655
% of existing
development
all-electric
20% 30%
-90-
220
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 75

Table 5-2. Community Greenhouse Gas Reduction Summary
Objective
Performance Indicators
GHG Reductions (MT
CO2e)
Metric 2030 2045 2030 2045
E3: Increase Carbon-
Free Energy Supply*
% of available
existing roof
space installed
with PV solar
10% 30% 33 —
% of accounts
enrolled in 100%
renewable
choice plan
75% single-
family
50%
multifamily
30%
commercial
30% industrial
— 38,893 —
Off -Road Equipment Sector
OR1:

Accelerate Zero-
Emission Off-Road
Equipment Adoption*
% of equipment
electrified
50% 60% 3,692 24,742
Water and Wastewater Sector
W1: Reduce Water
Use
% of
development
that install low-
flow appliances
50% — 1,253 —
W2: Increase Water
Reuse
Supporting measure
Solid Waste Sector
SW1: Reduce Waste
Generation
% reduction in
waste to landfill
25% 50% 2,697 5,448
Natural and Urban Lands Sector
NU1: Increase
Carbon Sequestration
through Urban
Greening*
Number of trees
planted
1,940 7,760 63 317
Total Reductionsa 159,173 198,646
-91-
221
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 76

Table 5-2. Community Greenhouse Gas Reduction Summary
Objective
Performance Indicators
GHG Reductions (MT
CO2e)
Metric 2030 2045 2030 2045
Target Reductions 154,711 198,642
Remaining Gap −4,462 −5
Note: GHG = greenhouse gas; MT CO 2e = metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent ; BEV = battery electric vehicles ; PHEV = plug-in hybrid electric vehicles; ABAU = adjusted business-as-usual, PV = photovoltaic. a Because multiple VMT reduction measures may influence the same travel behavior, the total reduction value accounts for overlapping effects and is less than the absolute sum of the individual action reductions. * Objectives marked with an asterisk include one or more actions that are part of the “20 Actions in Two Years” implementation phase; therefore, a portion of the associated emissions reductions may be realized in the near term.

Adaptation efforts are supported by the People and Community sector, which emphasizes community well-being and resilience through targeted programs, resources, and outreach.

This includes engaging a broad range of stakeholders and strengthening partnerships to expand access to sustainable practices. Key adaptation initiatives include enhancing cooling center programs and piloting innovative, locally driven solutions. These efforts are further supported by cross-cutting actions implemented across all sectors to advance both mitigation and resilience outcomes.

Municipal Reductions
As explained in Chapter 2, a separate municipal emissions inventory was developed to provide a more detailed understanding of the GHG emissions from City operations. Because municipal emissions are a subset of the communitywide inventory, they are already included in the communitywide emissions total.

Nonetheless, to highlight specific municipal-related GHG emissions reductions, Table 5-3 presents a summary of the City’s municipal objectives, underlying performance assumptions, and corresponding GHG reduction outcomes for 2030 and 2045. As shown in Table 5-3, under the assumed achievement levels for each objective, Costa Mesa is projected to achieve the municipal GHG emissions reductions of 911 MT CO2e in 2030 and 1,516 MT CO2e in 2045, which will achieve the State-aligned targets.
-92-
222
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 77

Table 5-3. Municipal Greenhouse Gas Reduction Summary
Objective
Performance Indicators
GHG Reductions (MT
CO2e)
Metric 2030 2045 2030 2045
M1: Reduce City
Vehicle Emissions*
Replace fleet
vehicles with
EVs
31 vehicles 61 vehicles 341 1,130
Implement a
voluntary
commute trip
reduction
program
All
employees
All
employees
Employees
purchase EVs
5% 20%
M2: Reduce City
Energy Use*
Energy retrofits,
energy use
reductions
5% 20% 1,045 345
Buildings all-
electric
All new
buildings,
10% of
existing
All new
buildings,
all existing
PV solar shade
structures
800 kW
capacity
—
PV solar roof
top installation
800 kW
capacity
new
buildings,
600 kW
capacity
existing
buildings
—
Battery energy
storage system
installation
4,800 kW
capacity
—
Enrollment in
100%
renewable
choice plan
All City
accounts
—
-93-
223
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 78

Table 5-3. Municipal Greenhouse Gas Reduction Summary
Objective
Performance Indicators
GHG Reductions (MT
CO2e)
Metric 2030 2045 2030 2045
M3: Zero-Emissions
Off-Road and
Landscaping
Equipment
% of equipment
electrified
— All off-road
equipment
— 37
M4: Reduce City
Facility Water Use
Upgrade
existing City
buildings with
water-efficient
appliances
All buildings
or as
funding
allows
All buildings
or as
funding
allows
20 16
M5: Reduce City-
Generated Solid
Waste
Supporting measure
Total Reductions 1,408 1,528
Target Reductions 911 1,516
Remaining Gap -497 -12
Note: GHG = greenhouse gas; MT CO 2e = metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent; EV = electric vehicle; PV = photovoltaic; kW = kilowatt.
* Objectives marked with an asterisk include one or more actions that are part of the “20 Actions in Two Years” implementation phase; therefore, a portion of the associated emissions reductions may be realized in the near term.

Achieving Carbon Neutrality
California has established statewide goals of achieving net-zero GHG emissions and reducing anthropogenic GHG emissions at least 85% below 1990 levels by 2045, as established under AB 1279. The California climate strategy recognizes that achieving net-zero GHG emissions, often referred to as carbon neutrality, will require a combination of substantial reductions in anthropogenic GHG emissions and carbon removal or sequestration activities.

The City's 2045 GHG reduction target is aligned with California's climate framework established under AB 1279 and represents Costa Mesa's appropriate, local contribution to achieve the State’s carbon neutrality goal. Consistent with the CARB Scoping Plan, local climate action targets should reflect what each jurisdiction can control, the emissions sources it can address, and the actions it can take to reduce emissions. Because carbon removal and sequestration efforts are largely outside the City's direct control and depend on evolving statewide guidance and emerging technologies, Costa Mesa's target focuses on achieving a reduction -94-
224
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 79

in communitywide anthropogenic emissions that aligns with AB 1279 (85% below 1990 levels) goal by 2045. This approach is consistent with the State’s emission reduction goals and helps ensure the City does its part to support California's goal of achieving carbon neutrality.

As state policies, methodologies, and technologies for carbon removal and sequestration continue to evolve, the City can evaluate additional opportunities through future CAAP updates.

Assembly Bill 39
In October 2025, the State of California enacted AB 39, the Local Electrification Planning Act.

The law requires jurisdictions with populations greater than 75,000 to adopt a local electrification plan or incorporate equivalent components into their general plan. These plans must include locally based goals, objectives, policies, and feasible implementation measures that, among other elements, identify opportunities to expand EV charging infrastructure, support building electrification, and prioritize equitable investments in zero-emission technologies for disadvantaged communities, low-income households, and small businesses.

Jurisdictions must adopt the required plan or general plan updates by January 1, 2030.

While the CAAP is not intended to fully satisfy all requirements of AB 39, it includes a suite of relevant objectives and actions. These actions can be further developed, expanded, and refined to meet the more detailed and specific requirements of AB 39. Select actions within the following objectives position the City to support and advance future compliance with AB 39:
• T1. Transition to Electric Vehicles
• E2. Decarbonize Building Energy Use
• E3. Increase Carbon-Free Energy Supply
• M1. Reduce City Vehicle Emissions
• M2. Reduce City Energy Use

-95-
225
CHAPTER 5 CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 80

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-96-
226

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 81 ch 6
CHAPTER 6
Implementation
and Monitoring
-97-
227

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 82 6 Implementation and Monitoring
Clearly defined implementation procedures and monitoring metrics are essential to ensure accountability and enable adjustments as the plan evolves. Accordingly, Chapter 6 presents the framework for implementing and monitoring the CAAP.

Successful implementation of the CAAP relies on the following key components:
• Clearly defined roles
and responsibilities
• Identification of
funding opportunities
• A timeline with
established milestones
• Performance indicators to
track progress
• Ongoing community engagement
The core elements of effective implementation are described below with additional detail provided in Appendix E.

Roles and Responsibilities
City Departments
The following key departments will lead implementation of the individual CAAP actions:
• The City Manager’s Office will lead the coordination of overall CAAP implementation and monitoring of progress. The Energy and Sustainability Services Manager within the City Manager’s Office will be the CAAP point of contact. • The Community Development Department will lead actions related to permitting, zoning, and development standards and will support workforce development and job creation initiatives. The Planning Division will ensure that CAAP actions are integrated into new development, as appropriate.
• Public Works will lead a wide range of actions, including those involving modifications to the City’s public right-of-way, infrastructure improvements, equipment installation, water and solid waste systems, and urban forestry programs. • The Finance Department will provide funding, budgeting, and financial oversight for CAAP initiatives.
• Parks and Community Services will support actions related to community programs and events and will be involved with projects in City parks and community centers.

CAAP IMPLEMENTATION
Implementation refers to the process
of carrying out the actions identified
in Chapter 5.
-98-
228
CHAPTER 6 IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 83

• Communications and Marketing will lead outreach and promotional efforts associated with CAAP implementation and will coordinate with applicable departments on educational resources.
• The Office of Emergency Management will support long-term planning and coordination efforts focused on emergency preparedness and adaptation to climate change.
• Fire and Rescue will focus on response- and operations-based actions addressing the immediate impacts of climate-related events and will lead or coordinate on actions addressing wildfire.
• The Police Department will support public safety and emergency response during climate-related incidents.
• Information Technology will provide the technological infrastructure necessary for data collection, monitoring, and communication to support CAAP implementation.

While the City Manager’s Office will lead CAAP implementation, success will depend on strong collaboration across all departments and a shared sense of responsibility.

-99-
229
CHAPTER 6 IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 84

Community Partners
In addition to City departments and leadership, successful implementation of the CAAP will require active participation and collaboration from community partners including residents, businesses, community-based organizations, schools, and regional agencies. Many CAAP actions depend on voluntary behavior changes to reduce GHG emissions and enhance community resilience, necessitating meaningful involvement from residents and business owners. These individual efforts will contribute incrementally to achieving CAAP goals while encouraging broader community participation.

Local community-based organizations and educational institutions can further support implementation through outreach, education, and marketing initiatives, offering subject matter expertise and expanding the reach of community engagement efforts.

Regional agencies play a critical role in
supporting CAAP implementation through
partnerships that promote efficient resource
use, coordinated planning, enhanced
engagement, and strengthened funding
opportunities. Further, several topics, such as
climate hazards like flood risk, span beyond
the boundaries of Costa Mesa and require
multi-jurisdictional collaboration for actions to
be most effective.

BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS
Local and regional partnerships
can expand capacity, enabling
the City to reach more
community members and
achieve greater impact.
-100-
230
CHAPTER 6 IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 85

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
The City prepared a cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate the estimated costs and benefits to Costa Mesa residents, businesses, community organizations, and government agencies associated with implementing select CAAP actions. The analysis provides information to help prioritize CAAP actions and pursue State, Federal, and regional funding opportunities to support implementation.

The analysis included 13 actions across the On-Road Transportation, Energy and Building, Natural and Urban Lands, Off-Road Equipment, and Municipal sectors. The actions were selected based on their quantitative GHG reduction or carbon sequestration potential. Each action was assessed based on its estimated cost per MT of GHG emissions reduced or carbon sequestered, allowing for comparison across sectors and providing insight into the relative costs and benefits.

The cost-effectiveness analysis is intended to inform implementation priorities, support grant and funding applications, and provide decision makers with a better understanding of the relative economic performance of key CAAP actions. Because costs, technology performance, energy prices, funding availability, and regulatory conditions will continue to evolve, the findings are used as a planning-level tool to support early implementation rather than as definitive estimates. Additional information regarding methodology, assumptions, and results is provided in Appendix F, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Funding Opportunities
Identifying funding sources for Costa Mesa’s CAAP actions is essential to successful implementation. Although many actions are expected to yield long-term economic benefits, the upfront costs can be substantial and pose challenges for the City and its implementing partners, including residents and local businesses, without access to external funding.

A range of external funding opportunities is available to support climate-related initiatives, including Federal, State, regional, and local programs. However, funding availability and program requirements are continually evolving and can change significantly from year to year. As such, it is important that City staff regularly monitor these sources to ensure the most current and advantageous funding opportunities are pursued in support of CAAP implementation. Key funding sources are identified in Appendix E and Appendix F. -101-
231
CHAPTER 6 IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 86

Timeline
Establishing a clear timeline is essential to the successful implementation of the Costa Mesa CAAP. Because the City uses the CAAP as a roadmap to achieve State-aligned GHG reduction targets for 2030 and 2045, strategically sequencing actions over time helps to translate long-term goals into measurable outcomes. To support this, the CAAP is implemented in phases, with performance metrics used to monitor progress and measure success over time.

Phasing
Given the scale and complexity of the actions required to meet the City’s climate goals, implementation will follow a deliberate, phased approach. Strategically sequencing actions helps ensure efficient use of City resources while maximizing overall impact. Phasing considerations include factors such as GHG reduction potential, cost-effectiveness, State mandates and regulations, feasibility, and readiness.

CAAP actions are grouped into four implementation phases, as described below:
• Ongoing: The “ongoing” phase includes actions that have already been implemented or are underway at the time of CAAP adoption. These efforts will be maintained, expanded, or enhanced as part of ongoing implementation. • Phase 1 (20 actions in 2 years): Phase 1 actions reflect City priorities and establish the foundation for successful implementation within a short timeframe. Many of these actions are momentum-building and provide strategic planning to focus resources, facilitate funding, or build capacity to accelerate meaningful progress. • Phase 2 (by 2030): Phase 2 actions are high-impact measures that are feasible with existing technologies, resources, and institutional capacity. Phase 2 actions often expand on the policies, infrastructure, and partnerships established in Phase 1. Many of these actions offer scalable benefits that can be built on to achieve greater reductions beyond 2030.
• Phase 3 (by 2045): Phase 3 actions reflect the City’s long-term vision and commitment to climate innovation. At the time of CAAP adoption, these efforts may be less feasible due to emerging technologies, evolving regulatory frameworks, or limited funding.

Alternatively, these actions may be less effective at reducing emissions or result in fewer co-benefits. While planning and research may begin in earlier phases, full implementation is expected to occur later in the timeline. -102-
232
CHAPTER 6 IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 87

Performance Indicators
Performance indicators are included for CAAP actions, where appropriate, to provide clear guidance and measurable benchmarks for implementation. In most cases, indicators are established for the target years of 2030 and 2045, enabling lead City departments to identify key milestones necessary to achieve each action within those timeframes.

Performance indicators are tied to quantifiable GHG emission reductions where feasible, allowing for objective evaluation of progress and outcomes. These indicators are intentionally designed to be straightforward and easy to track, minimizing administrative burden on City staff while promoting transparency, accountability, and consistent progress monitoring.

Monitoring
CAAP monitoring refers to the broader, ongoing process that evaluates the cumulative success of the individual actions. This involves tracking progress, evaluating outcomes, and making adjustments when necessary to ensure that the implemented actions are collectively achieving the plan’s fundamental goals. Monitoring will be the responsibility of the City Manager’s Office Energy and Sustainability Services Division, with regular input from the lead implementing City departments.

City staff will use an implementation matrix to track the progress of individual CAAP actions.

The implementation matrix is a comprehensive table that includes all relevant components needed for the lead departments to implement their actions (see Appendix E for the full implementation matrix). Relevant implementation components provided in the matrix include the following:
• Sector
• Objective
• Action
• Action Type
• Lead City Department
• Partners
• Phase
• Performance Indicators
• Funding Opportunities
The matrix serves as a roadmap that can easily be referenced and monitored to assess CAAP progress.
-103-
233
CHAPTER 6 IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 88

Ongoing Community Engagement
Ongoing community engagement is critical to the
successful implementation of the CAAP.

Several CAAP actions focus on increasing education
and awareness of mitigation and adaptation
programs. Continued outreach efforts will include
targeted marketing to promote available incentives,
rebates, and funding opportunities for residents and
businesses undertaking voluntary actions. These
educational initiatives and promotional campaigns
will occur throughout implementation, raising
awareness of key topics while also serving as ongoing
touchpoints with the community. Through
these efforts, the City aims to empower
individuals to take action and to foster a
shared sense of ownership in achieving
CAAP goals.

While community engagement activities will
primarily be led by the City staff,
coordination with community partners,
including schools, community-based
organizations, and regional agencies, will be
essential to broaden the reach and
effectiveness of these efforts.

SUSTAINING ENGAGEMENT
Sustained dialogue with
community members will help
ensure the CAAP remains
responsive, inclusive, and
effective in achieving its goals
for all those it impacts.
-104-
234

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026

Acronyms and
Abbreviations
-105-
235

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xvii

Acronyms and Abbreviations
Acronym/Abbreviation Definition
AB Assembly Bill
ABAU adjusted business as usual
BAU business as usual
CAAP Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code
CH4 methane
City or Costa Mesa City of Costa Mesa
CO2 carbon dioxide
CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent
EV electric vehicle
FHSZ Fire Hazard Severity Zone
GHG greenhouse gas
GWP global warming potential
GWRS Groundwater Replenishment System
IPM Integrated Pest Management
LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard
MT metric ton
N2O nitrogen dioxide
PV photovoltaic
RCP Representative Concentration Pathway
ROP Regional Occupation Program
RTAC Regional Transportation Advisory Committee
SB Senate Bill
VMT vehicle miles traveled

-106-
236

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xviii

Glossary
-107-
237

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xix

Glossary
Adaptive Capacity
“Adaptive capacity” refers to a community’s ability to withstand, adapt to, and recover from hazards. City facilities and programs can enhance adaptive capacity by providing more resilient resources for the community. The Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) describes Costa Mesa’s adaptive capacity within the Community Assets section of Appendix B, and the CAAP includes policies to increase adaptive capacity.

Anthropogenic
The word “anthropogenic” refers to environmental change caused or influenced by people, either directly or indirectly. Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.

Baseline Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Inventory
A baseline GHG emissions inventory is a quantified snapshot of the GHG emissions generated within a defined geographic boundary during a specific year. For the City’s CAAP, 2023 was chosen to represent the baseline year. The baseline inventory represents all emissions sources occurring within city limits and serves as a reference point for comparison over time.

Establishing a baseline inventory is a critical first step in climate action planning, providing the foundation for tracking progress, evaluating trends, and forecasting future emissions to inform reduction strategies.

Business as Usual (BAU) and Adjusted Business as Usual (ABAU) The BAU scenario describes emissions based on projected growth in population, employment, and other factors and does not consider policies that would reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the future (see “Forecasted Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory”). The ABAU scenario describes emissions based on projected growth and considers policies that will achieve GHG reductions in the future (i.e., it assumes Federal- and State-mandated GHG emissions reduction measures would be implemented by the projected forecast year). The ABAU scenario, unlike the BAU, accounts for adopted GHG emissions reductions due to regulations that would be implemented between the baseline year and future years. Costa Mesa’s GHG emissions were forecasted for two future years (2030 and 2045) for two scenarios: BAU and ABAU.
-108-
238

GLOSSARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xx

California Air Resources Board (CARB)
CARB is a department of the California Environmental Protection Agency. It is responsible for regulating air quality in California. CARB develops and enforces regulations to reduce air pollution and protect public health and the environment. It also conducts research, monitors air quality, and promotes sustainable transportation and energy policies to improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. CARB plays a crucial role in California’s efforts to combat climate change and improve air quality for its residents.

California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
The California Green Building Standards Code, also known as CALGreen, sets the minimum requirements for green building practices for new construction and renovations in California. It was established to reduce the environmental impact of buildings and promote sustainable design and construction practices. CALGreen covers various aspects of building design, construction, and operation, including energy efficiency, water conservation, indoor air quality, and material selection. The code requires builders to meet certain green building standards, such as using energy-efficient lighting and appliances, installing low-flow plumbing fixtures, and using environmentally friendly building materials.

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
CO2 is a naturally occurring gas and a by-product of human activities and is the principal anthropogenic (i.e., caused by human activity) greenhouse gas that affects the earth’s radiative balance. Natural sources of CO2 include the respiration of bacteria, plants, animals, and fungus; evaporation from oceans; volcanic out-gassing; and the decomposition of dead organic matter. Human activities that generate CO2 include the combustion of fuels such as coal, oil, natural gas, and wood, as well as changes in land use. CO2 is the predominant greenhouse gas evaluated in the CAAP.

Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2e)
CO2e is a unit of measurement that is used to compare the emissions of various greenhouse gases (GHGs) based on their global warming potential. It represents the amount of CO2 that would have the same global warming impact as a given quantity of another GHG over a specified period. CO2e is used in the CAAP inventory to easily compare GHG emissions across sectors and years.
-109-
239

GLOSSARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xxi

Carbon Sequestration
Carbon sequestration is the process by which carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere and stored in natural or artificial reservoirs, or “carbon pools.” There are three types of carbon sequestration: biological, geological, and technological. Biological carbon sequestration is the storage of carbon dioxide in vegetation such as crops, forests, and grasslands, as well as in soils and oceans. Geologic carbon sequestration involves injecting carbon into underground geologic formations. Technological carbon sequestration captures and stores carbon from the atmosphere in engineered materials or devices.

Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP)
A CAAP is a comprehensive road map that outlines the activities and informs the decisions that an agency will undertake to achieve reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; it also develops comprehensive strategies to proactively address the impacts of climate change on climate-related hazards. A CAAP typically includes a range of actions aimed at reducing GHG emissions, such as promoting renewable energy, improving energy efficiency, and enhancing transportation options. It also includes measures to build resilience to climate change, such as upgrading infrastructure, hazard preparedness, managing water resources, and protecting natural ecosystems.

Climate-Related Hazards
Climate-related hazards are natural hazards that are impacted by climate characteristics like temperature and precipitation. Climate characteristics are projected to change as a result of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Costa Mesa experiences the following climate-related hazards: drought, extreme heat, fire, and flooding.

Community Choice Aggregator (CCA)
A CCA allows local governments to procure electricity on behalf of their residents, businesses, and municipal accounts from an alternative supplier while still receiving transmission and distribution services from their existing utility provider. CCAs are formed to provide energy options that are more local, renewable, and/or cost-effective than those offered by the existing utility provider.
-110-
240

GLOSSARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xxii

Community-Based Organization
Community-based organizations are groups that work on local issues and causes, including within the Costa Mesa community or regionally. These groups include nonprofits, religious centers, local businesses, research centers or universities, culture- and ethnicity-oriented groups, immigrant groups, and others.

Compounding Hazards
Compounding hazards can result from climate-related hazards and lead to additional impacts. For example, in Costa Mesa, a combination of wildfire followed by extreme precipitation could lead to the compounding hazard of debris/mud flows. Further, regionally major flooding or wildfires could result in climate migration, a situation in which people move following a hazard.

Cooling Center
A cooling center is a publicly available facility that residents can use to access air conditioning and cool off. In Costa Mesa, facilities that fall under this definition include community centers (such as Balearic Community Center, Downtown Recreation Center, Norma Hertzog Community Center, and the Costa Mesa Senior Center) and City Hall.

Decarbonization
Decarbonization is a strategic approach to reduce or entirely remove carbon-emitting energy sources, fuels, industrial processes, and other products and activities to mitigate the impacts of climate change by lowering greenhouse gas emissions, primarily carbon dioxide. This process involves transitioning to cleaner, renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, and promoting carbon sequestration, among other measures. Decarbonization of the transportation and energy sector are key objectives of the CAAP.

Disadvantaged Communities (DACs)
DACs are areas that experience the highest combination of economic, health, and environmental burdens. Examples of these burdens include poverty, high unemployment, air and water pollution, the presence of hazardous waste, asthma, and more. One way that the State identifies these areas is through an analytical tool created by the California Environmental Protection Agency called CalEnviroScreen, which combines data on economic, health, and environmental burdens into a score to determine relative DACs. -111-
241

GLOSSARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xxiii

Census tracts that score 75% or higher are considered disadvantaged by the State. Costa Mesa has two census tracts that are considered disadvantaged (approximately bounded by 19th Street to the north, 16th Street to the south, Newport Boulevard to the east, and city limits to the west). These are discussed more in Appendix B.

Emergency Response Facilities
Emergency response facilities include police, fire, and other emergency response services activated during an emergency and used to respond to potentially harmful situations like hazard events. For the purposes of the CAAP, it is important to know where these buildings are located and if they are resilient to climate hazards in their current state.

Emission Reduction Potential
Emission reduction potential is the capacity for reducing the emission of greenhouse gases from a particular source, sector, or activity. It quantifies the maximum amount of emissions that could be avoided or reduced through the implementation of specific measures or actions. For quantifiable measures, an emission reduction potential is noted in the CAAP.

Emissions Scenarios
An emissions scenario is a possible future pathway of GHG emissions used by climate models to project how the climate may change over time, which can aid in assessing possible future climate hazards. Because of the uncertainty of future global emissions concentrations, models evaluate multiple scenarios to capture a range of possible outcomes. The medium-emissions scenario (formally referred to as Representative Concentration Pathway [RCP] 4.5) assumes that global emissions peak around 2040 and then decline, while the high-emissions scenario (formally referred to as RCP 8.5) assumes that emissions continue to increase through 2100. In line with State recommendations, this document considers only RCP 8.5 for mid-century (2035-2064) projections and discusses both RCP 4.5 and 8.5 for end-of-century (2070-2099) projections.

Equity
Equity involves the fair and inclusive consideration of community needs, circumstances, and barriers to ensure all residents have meaningful opportunities to participate in and benefit from public programs, services, investments, and decision-making processes. It recognizes that individuals and communities face different challenges and vulnerabilities and calls for those differences to be reflected in policy development and resource allocation. -112-
242

GLOSSARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xxiv

In the context of climate action and adaptation planning, equity focuses on identifying and addressing disproportionate impacts from climate-related hazards while ensuring fair access to resilience strategies, sustainability programs, public engagement opportunities, and the benefits of climate investments. An equitable approach supports the health, safety, and well- being of all residents, particularly those most vulnerable to environmental, economic, and climate-related risks.

Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZs)
These zones are designated by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and adopted by local governments to signify an elevated likelihood of fire hazard due to inherent characteristics of the land, like fuel loading, slope, and weather patterns. These zones do not account for mitigation measures such as vegetation management. Areas designated as High or Very High FHSZs are subject to certain Building Code regulations related to ignition-resistant building materials for new development, and Very High FHSZs are also subject to defensible space vegetation regulations. Portions of western and southwestern Costa Mesa are designated as High FHSZs. The City’s High FHSZs are primarily open space but also overlap with parcels containing approximately 547 dwelling units, one school, and a religious institution.

Forecasted Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Inventory
A forecasted GHG emissions inventory is a projection of future GHG emissions within a defined geographic boundary over a specified planning horizon. For the City’s CAAP, GHG emissions were forecasted for 2030 and 2045 in alignment with key statewide GHG emission reduction goals. A forecasted inventory estimates how emissions are expected to change over time based on anticipated factors such as regulatory conditions and population and employment growth (see the “Business-as-Usual (BAU) and Adjusted Business-as-Usual (ABAU)” entry). The forecasted inventory is used to identify trends, evaluate the projected emissions gap relative to reduction targets, and inform the development of strategies and measures needed to achieve GHG reduction goals.

Global Warming Potential (GWP)
GWP is a measure of how much heat a greenhouse gas (GHG) traps in the earth’s atmosphere over a specified period relative to the same amount of carbon dioxide (CO2). It is used to compare the relative impact of different GHGs on global warming and climate change. For example, methane has a GWP that is 21 times that of CO2. -113-
243

GLOSSARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xxv

Greenhouse Effect
The greenhouse effect is a natural process that warms the earth. The earth’s atmosphere naturally contains greenhouse gases (GHGs) that trap some of the sun’s outgoing radiation, keeping the earth warm enough to support life. Increased concentrations of GHGs due to human activities, such as burning fossil fuels, are causing the earth to warm at an accelerated rate, leading to climate change.

Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
A GHG is a gas that absorbs and emits radiation in the earth’s atmosphere, contributing to the greenhouse effect. GHGs act as a blanket around the earth, trapping heat and leading to increases in global temperatures. The primary GHGs in the earth’s atmosphere include water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O), which may be caused by natural or human processes. The CAAP GHG inventory includes CO2, CH4, and N2O, which represent the primary GHGs associated with activities within Costa Mesa.

Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)
An LCFS is a regulatory program that requires a reduction in the carbon intensity of transportation fuels, such as gasoline and diesel. The goal of an LCFS is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector by promoting the use of low-carbon and renewable fuels. California’s LCFS law requires changes to the types of fuels used in vehicles.

Methane (CH4)
CH4 is a key greenhouse gas evaluated in the CAAP. CH4 is a flammable gas and is the main component of natural gas. CH4 is produced through both natural and human activities. CH4 is produced through the anaerobic (without oxygen) decomposition of waste in landfills, flooded rice fields, animal digestion, decomposition of animal wastes, production and distribution of natural gas and petroleum, coal production, and incomplete fossil fuel combustion.

Natural and Urban Lands
For the purposes of this plan, the term natural and urban lands refers to parks, urban and community forests, trails, greenbelts, landscaped open spaces and public rights-of-way, community gardens, and other similar lands within the City. Consistent with California's Natural and Working Lands program, protection and management of these lands can help meet the -114-
244

GLOSSARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xxvi

State's greenhouse gas reduction goals through the removal of carbon from the atmosphere and the sequestration of carbon in vegetation and soils. Additionally, these lands can also support climate adaptation, improve water quality, reduce flood risk, and provide recreational, environmental, and economic benefits.

Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
N2O is a key greenhouse gas evaluated in the CAAP. N2O is produced through natural and human activities, mainly through agricultural activities and natural biological processes, although fuel burning and other processes also create N2O. Sources of N2O include soil cultivation practices (microbial processes in soil and water), especially the use of commercial and organic fertilizers, manure management, industrial processes (such as in nitric acid production, nylon production, and fossil-fuel-fired power plants), vehicle emissions, and using N2O as a propellant (e.g., rockets, racecars, and aerosol sprays).

Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS)
RPS is a regulatory policy that requires utilities to obtain a certain percentage of their electricity from renewable sources, such as wind, solar, and geothermal energy. RPS policies are intended to promote the development of renewable energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the electricity sector. California’s RPS requires utility providers like Southern California Edison to generate 52% of their retail electricity using qualified renewable energy technologies by the end of 2027; 60% by 2030; 90% by 2035; 95% by 2040; and 100% by 2045.

Risk
Risk considers the overall potential impact of climate-related hazards. It accounts for a community’s potential exposure to climate-related hazards in combination with social or environmental factors that exist within the community and can heighten or reduce the impacts of climate-related hazards.

Urban Heat Island Effect
The urban heat island effect refers to temperatures in urban areas with higher rates of dark and impervious surfaces, like roads, parking lots, and buildings, which can be up to 7°F warmer than outlying areas during the day and retain heat longer into the night. This is due to these materials absorbing and re-emitting heat more than natural features, like trees. Urban heat islands in Costa Mesa are primarily concentrated inland, in areas with large parking lots and artificial turf athletic fields.
-115-
245

GLOSSARY

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 xxvii

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is a metric that represents the total number of miles driven by all vehicles within a defined geographic area over a specified period, typically expressed on a daily or annual basis. VMT reflects overall transportation activity and demand, accounting for the frequency and length of vehicle trips made by residents, workers, and visitors.

For the CAAP, VMT was calculated using the Regional Transportation Advisory Committee (RTAC) VMT calculation methodology, which proportions the VMT generated by Costa Mesa according to the location of the trip start (origin) and end (destination). The RTAC methodology estimates VMT for the various origin/destination trip types within Costa Mesa using the following accounting:
• Include 100% of internal–internal (II) trips
• Include 50% of internal–external and external–internal (IX and XI) trips • Exclude 0% of external–external (XX) trips
Vulnerability Assessment
A vulnerability assessment evaluates how climate-related hazards may affect a community's residents, infrastructure, natural resources, and services. The assessment considers factors such as exposure to climate hazards, the sensitivity of people and assets to those hazards, and the community's adaptive capacity to prepare for, respond to, and recover from climate impacts.

The results help identify areas of greatest climate risk and inform strategies to improve resilience and reduce vulnerability.
-116-
246

APPENDIX A
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Inventory,
Forecasting, and
Target Setting
-117-
247

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-1 Climate action refers to any deliberate efforts to mitigate future impacts of climate change by avoiding, reducing, or sequestering greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The critical components of the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) climate action process are development of the baseline GHG emissions inventory, forecasting future emissions, establishing reduction targets, estimating the related emissions gap, and identifying reduction strategies needed to close this gap. This appendix outlines the foundational components of this process, including the inventory, future emissions forecast, and target setting.

Introduction
The information below introduces climate change and GHG emissions to provide the necessary context to understand the purpose and benefits of preparing a GHG emissions inventory and addressing climate action within the City of Costa Mesa (City).

Greenhouse Effect and Climate Change
GHGs are gases that absorb infrared radiation (i.e., trap heat) in the earth’s atmosphere. The trapping and buildup of heat in the atmosphere near the earth’s surface is referred to as the “greenhouse effect” and is a natural process that contributes to the regulation of the earth’s temperature, creating a livable environment. The earth’s temperature depends on the balance between energy entering and leaving the planet’s system, and many factors (natural and human) can cause changes in the earth’s energy balance. Human activities that generate and emit GHGs into the atmosphere increase the amount of infrared radiation that gets absorbed before escaping into space, thus enhancing the greenhouse effect and causing the earth’s surface temperature to rise. This rise in temperature has led to large-scale changes to the earth’s system (e.g., temperature, precipitation, wind patterns), which are collectively referred to as climate change.

Greenhouse Gases
GHGs include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. Of these gases, CO2 and CH4 are emitted in the greatest quantities from human activities. Some GHGs are man-made, including fluorinated gases such as hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride, which are used in a variety of industrial products and processes.

Some gases are more effective than others at trapping heat, warming the earth’s oceans, land, and atmosphere. For each GHG, a global warming potential (GWP) was developed to -118-
248
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-2 allow comparisons of the global warming impacts of different GHGs. Specifically, per industry- standard calculations, GWP measures how much energy the emissions of 1 ton of a gas absorbs over a given period, typically a 100-year time span, relative to the emissions of 1 ton of CO2. Gases with a higher GWP contribute more to the earth’s warming because they absorb more energy (per ton emitted) than gases with a lower GWP.1 All GHGs in the emissions inventory and reduction measures in this CAAP are presented in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent (MT CO2e), which account for weighted GWP factors for CH4 and N2O. The GWPs applied are from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6).2 Table 1 provides a summary of the three primary GHGs, their sources, and their GWPs.

Table 1. Greenhouse Gases and Global Warming Potential
GHG Description
GWP
(100 -year
value)
Carbon Dioxide
(CO2)
CO2 is a naturally occurring gas that is also a byproduct of human activities, primarily through the combustion of fossil fuels and changes in land use, such as deforestation. It is the principal anthropogenic (i.e., human-caused) GHG that affects the earth’s solar radiative balance.
1 Methane (CH4) CH4 is produced through both natural and human activities and is the main component of natural gas. It is produced through anaerobic (without oxygen) decomposition of landfill and animal waste, flooded rice fields, animal digestion, production and distribution of natural gas and petroleum, coal production, and incomplete fossil fuel combustion. CH4 derived from fossil fuel sources has a slightly higher GWP than CH4 from non-fossil fuel sources.

27.9a
Nitrous Oxide (N2O) N2O is produced through natural and human activities, mainly through agricultural activities and natural biological processes, although fuel burning and other processes also create N2O.

Sources of N2O include soil cultivation practices, especially the use of fertilizers; manure management; industrial processes (such as in the production of nylon, and from fossil-fuel-fired power 273

1 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2024. Understanding Global Warming Potentials. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials. 2 IPCC. 2021. Chapter 7: The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks and Climate Sensitivity - Supplementary Material. August. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/ IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter_07_Supplementary_Material.pdf.
-119-
249
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-3 Table 1. Greenhouse Gases and Global Warming Potential
GHG Description
GWP
(100 -year
value)
plants); vehicle emissions; and its use as a propellant (such as in rockets, racecars, and aerosol sprays).

Notes: GHG = greenhouse gas; GWP = global warming potential.

The descriptions of GHGs are summarized from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Sixth Assessment Report and the California Air Resources Board’s Glossary of Terms Used in GHG Inventories. a The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Sixth Assessment Report provides two methane (CH 4) GWP values: 29.8 (Methane – fossil) and 27.0 (Methane – non-fossil). Per industry guidance, the value 27.9 is used herein, given that sources include those from biogenic origin and fossil-fuel combustion.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
An emissions inventory is a snapshot of the GHG emissions associated within a geographic boundary during a given period—in this case, 2023 emissions within Costa Mesa’s city limits.

Establishing a baseline inventory of GHG emissions is an important initial step to set a baseline for future inventories, to track progress against the baseline and for forecasting future GHG emissions. These foundational steps are also necessary to estimate the GHG emissions gap that must be addressed to meet the City’s GHG reduction targets.

The Costa Mesa CAAP includes two GHG emissions inventories: communitywide and municipal, as described below:
• Communitywide Inventory: All GHG emissions generated within the City’s direct or indirect jurisdiction constitute the communitywide inventory. This includes all the GHG emissions that result from activities associated with residents, businesses, tourists, visitors, and other community sources.
• Municipal Inventory: The municipal inventory is limited to emissions generated by City- owned operations. Examples of these sources include the City’s vehicle fleet, and energy use in City buildings and facilities. By establishing a municipal inventory, the City can identify its own contribution and better lead the emissions reduction effort by example.

3 GHG Management Institute. 2024. Which Methane GWP Value Do I Use? October 17, 2024. https://ghginstitute.org/2024/10/17/which-methane-gwp-value-do-i-use/. -120-
250
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-4 Methodology
Consistent with recommendations from the state’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation,4 development of the communitywide GHG inventory and projections follows the U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions,5 and development of the municipal inventory follows the Local Government Operations Protocol.6 Where appropriate, the inventories and projections also follow best practice guidance from the Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) California Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Baseline Inventory Protocol,7 Forecasting Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Setting Reduction Targets,8 and California Supplement to the United States Communitywide Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Protocol.9
Estimating GHG emissions from each sector requires activity data and emission factors. Activity data can refer to the amount of energy consumed (kilowatt-hours [kWh] or therms), waste produced (tons), and water used (gallons), while emission factors are a measure of how carbon-intensive each of the activities is (i.e., the amount of GHGs that are emitted by a unit of activity). Each emissions sector and the relevant activity data used to estimate 2023 GHG emissions are outlined in the following sections. Tracking activity data enables the City to evaluate GHG emissions reductions resulting from behavioral changes rather than improvements in efficiency (i.e., changes in emission factors).

Per relevant protocols, local governments should define jurisdictional boundaries for communitywide GHG emissions inventories. These boundaries typically align with the geographic area over which the local government has authority, such as city limits. This ensures that the inventory accurately reflects the emissions from all sources and activities within the community’s control. As such, the 2023 GHG inventory estimates emissions from all the meaningful sources within the City’s direct or indirect control, including energy

4 California Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation. 2017. General Plan Guidelines and Technical Advisories, Chapter 8: Climate Change. https://lci.ca.gov/planning/general-plan/guidelines.html. 5 ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives). 2019. U.S. Community Protocol and Reporting of GHG Emissions. July 2019. Local Governments for Sustainability – USA. https://icleiusa.org/ us-community-protocol/.
6 CARB, CCAR, ICLEI, and TCR. 2018. Local Government Operations Protocol For the quantification and reporting of GHG emissions inventories Version 1.1. May 2010. https://icleiusa.org/resources/local-government-operations- lgo-protocol/.
7 AEP. 2011. California Community-Wide GHG Baseline Inventory Protocol White Paper. June. https://califaep.org/docs/Community-wide_GHG_Protocol.pdf. 8 AEP. 2012. Forecasting Community-Wide GHG Emissions and Setting Reduction Targets. May. https://califaep.org/docs/Forecasting_and_Target_Setting.pdf. 9 AEP. 2013. The California Supplement to the United States Community-Wide GHG (GHG) Emissions Protocol.

December. https://califaep.org/docs/California_Supplement_to_the_National_Protocol.pdf. -121-
251
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-5 consumption, on-road transportation, off-road equipment, solid waste, water use, and wastewater.

The results of the communitywide and municipal inventories, along with detailed descriptions of each emissions sector and the relevant activity data used to estimate 2023 GHG emissions, are outlined in the following sections.

Communitywide Emissions Inventory
The communitywide GHG emissions inventory includes emissions from all the meaningful sources within the City’s direct or indirect jurisdictional control. When data is available, the communitywide inventory is shown in terms of the different land uses within the City (e.g., residential and non-residential). Because the communitywide inventory captures all typical sources, it can be easily correlated with statewide efforts to reduce GHG emissions. Table 2 provides a summary of the City’s communitywide GHG emissions inventory for baseline year 2023 by sector.

Table 2. 2023 Communitywide Baseline Inventory
Sector MT CO 2e Percent of Total
On-Road Transportation 551,893 63%
Energy 266,921 31%
Water 3,767 <1%
Wastewater 4,686 <1%
Solid Waste 10,140 1%
Off-Road Equipment 34,993 4%
Total 872,400 100%
Notes: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Percentage may not total due to rounding.

The detailed approach and results of the emissions inventory estimate is provided in the sections below by sector, including what activities are included, the activity data used, and the emission factors or methods to calculate emissions. -122-
252
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-6 On-Road Transportation
GHG emissions from on-road vehicle travel are related to the combustion of fossil fuels, including gasoline, diesel, and natural gas.10 Activity data used to estimate on-road transportation emissions includes vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by speed and vehicle type within Costa Mesa.

For the communitywide inventory, VMT estimates include the vehicle travel associated with residents, workers, students, visitors, etc. engaged in activities that begin and end in Costa Mesa. Annual City VMT for baseline year 2023 was provided by Fehr & Peers.11 VMT was calculated using the Regional Transportation Advisory Committee (RTAC) VMT calculation methodology, which proportions the VMT generated by the City according to the location of the trip start (origin) and end (destination). The RTAC methodology estimates VMT for the various origin/destination trip types within Costa Mesa using the following accounting:
• Include 100% of internal–internal (II) trips. The VMT associated with vehicle trips that have an origin and destination within Costa Mesa are multiplied by 1.0, given that the City is responsible for and has the opportunity to reduce these emissions through land use changes at both locations (i.e., the ability to provide transit connecting both locations and other methods of VMT reduction).
• Include 50% of internal–external and external–internal (IX and XI) trips. The VMT for vehicle trips that have an origin within and destination outside of Costa Mesa and conversely those that have an origin outside of and destination within Costa Mesa are multiplied by 0.5. With this assumption, half of the VMT from these trips is assigned to the City, while the other half is assumed to be the responsibility of the relevant jurisdiction outside of the City.
• Exclude 0% of external–external (XX) trips. The VMT for vehicle trips with origins and destinations outside of Costa Mesa (i.e., vehicles passing through) are not included, as these trips are assigned to the relevant origin/destination geographic regions outside of the City’s jurisdictional control.

On-road vehicle emission factors were calculated using the California Air Resources Board (CARB) EMission FACtor (EMFAC) mobile-source emissions inventory model (EMFAC2025 v2.0.0).12 EMFAC provides emission factors for different California geographical regions, years, vehicle types, and other vehicle information, such as fuel and speed. Emission factors for CO2,

10 Emissions related to electricity consumed for electric vehicle (EV) charging are included in the building energy sector.
11 Fehr & Peers. 2026. Costa Mesa Climate Action & Adaptation Plan (CAAP) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Methodology and Inventory Summary. April 3.
12 CARB. 2025. EMFAC2025 (v2.0.0) Emission Inventory. https://arb.ca.gov/emfac/. -123-
253
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-7 CH4, and N2O were obtained from EMFAC2025 for baseline year 2023 for the Orange County region. A weighted average emissions factor was applied for City-wide VMT provided by Fehr & Peers.

Annual VMT and GHG emissions from on-road transportation within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023 are provided in Table 3.

Table 3. 2023 Communitywide On-Road Transportation Activity Data and Emissions Source Annual VMT MT CO 2e
On-Road Transportation 1,347,686,776 551,893
Note: VMT = vehicle miles traveled; MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Building Energy
Building energy generates GHG emissions directly through consumption of natural gas for heating and indirectly through the use of electricity. Annual GHG emissions from community energy use within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023 are provided in Table 4. The activity data, emission factors, and methodologies for estimating GHG emissions from energy are described below for each respective energy type.

Table 4. 2023 Communitywide Energy Emissions
Source MT CO 2e Percent of Total
Electricity 152,054 57%
Natural Gas 114,867 43%
Total 266,921 100%
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

ELECTRICITY
Indirect GHG emissions from the use of electricity within Costa Mesa were estimated using annual electricity consumption data (i.e., kWh per year) provided by Southern California Edison (SCE). For baseline year 2023, electricity consumption was provided for residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural customers.

GHG emissions intensity factors (pounds of CO2e per megawatt-hour [MWh]) for SCE were obtained from the 2023 Power Content Label and are reflective of the power mixes therein.

The SCE emissions rate was adjusted using information on the total enrollment of SCE customers within Costa Mesa within each of the specific rate options (i.e., Green Rate 50%, -124-
254
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-8 Green Rate 100%, SCE Community Renewable, and SCE Power Mix).13 The adjusted rate was then applied to the 2023 SCE electricity consumption.

Communitywide consumption and GHG emissions from electricity use within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023 are provided in Table 5.

Table 5. 2023 Communitywide Electricity Activity Data and Emissions Land Use Type Annual MWh MT CO 2e
Residential 198,578 44,087
Non-Residential 486,301 107,966
Total 684,879 152,054
Note: MWh= megawatt-hour; MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Totals may not sum due to rounding.

NATURAL GAS
GHG emissions related to the combustion of natural gas were estimated using consumption data (i.e., therms per year) by land use type, including single-family and multifamily residential, commercial, and industrial. For baseline year 2023, natural gas consumption for all land use types was provided by Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). Natural gas emission factors for CO2, CH4, and N2O were obtained from The Climate Registry and applied to annual consumption data to estimate emissions.14
Communitywide consumption and GHG emissions from natural gas use within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023 are provided in Table 6.

Table 6. 2023 Communitywide Natural Gas Activity Data and Emissions Land Use Type Annual Therms MT CO 2e
Residential 13,394,998 71,148
Non-Residential 8,231,106 43,720
Total 21,626,104 114,867
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

13 SCE. 2025. Green Tariff Shared Renewables Program Data Request. Prepared by Michael Tong C Shu.

June 12, 2025.
14 The Climate Registry. 2023. “2023 Default Emission Factors.” June 2023. https://theclimateregistry.org/wp- content/uploads/2023/06/2023-Default-Emission-Factors-Final-1.pdf. -125-
255
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-9 Water
GHG emissions associated with the City’s water use come from the electricity consumed in the extraction (groundwater pumping), conveyance (groundwater and imports), and distribution of water to residents and businesses. The City’s GHG emissions are primarily associated with energy used to pump groundwater.

For the communitywide inventory, emissions from water include all residential and non- residential water usage from customers of the City’s water system. Water consumption data was obtained from the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) and Mesa Water District.15,16 Local utility emission factors from SCE for the baseline year 2023 were applied to the energy estimated for the City’s groundwater extraction, while eGRID factors were applied to water imports. Energy intensity factors for water supply were obtained from the IRWD and Mesa Water District 2020 Urban Water Management Plans (UWMP).17,18 Communitywide consumption and GHG emissions from water use within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023 are provided in Table 7.

Table 7. 2023 Communitywide Water Activity Data and Emissions Land Use Type Annual Million Gallons MT CO 2e
Residential 3,010 2,226
Non-Residential 2,085 1,540
Total 5,095 3,767
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Wastewater
Wastewater treatment emits GHGs such as CH4 when the chemical and microbial processes that break down sewage in anaerobic (without oxygen) environments release biogas as a byproduct. The facilities that treat wastewater generated by Costa Mesa are owned and operated by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSAN). The City’s wastewater emissions

15 IRWD. 2025. Costa Mesa Water Usage. Prepared by Amy McNulty. April 3, 2025. 16 Mesa Water District. 2025. City of Costa Mesa Consumption Public Records Request. Prepared by Isabel Stevens. August 12, 2025.
17 IRWD. 2021. IRWD – 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. June. https://www.irwd.com/images/pdf/doing- business/environmental-
documents/UWMP/2020_urban_water_management_plan_irwd_adopted_june2021.pdf. 18 Mesa Water District. 2021. Mesa Water District 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. June. https://www.mesawater.org/sites/default/files/Save%20Water/Documents/Mesa%20Water%202020%20UWMP% 20FINAL-2021.06.30.pdf.
-126-
256
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-10 were calculated using annual per-capita wastewater production values for Costa Mesa residents obtained from the City’s 2021 Wastewater Master Plan Update,19 annual flow data obtained from OCSAN,20 and GHG emissions data for the OCSAN Treatment Plant No. 2 obtained from CARB.21
Annual input and GHG emissions from wastewater treatment within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023 are provided in Table 8.

Table 8. 2023 Communitywide Wastewater Activity Data and Emissions Source Annual Million Gallons MT CO 2e
Wastewater Treatment 3,311 4,686
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Solid Waste
GHG emissions from solid waste include fugitive emissions of CH4 and CO2 as waste decomposes over time. The community inventory includes emissions from waste generated within Costa Mesa, which was provided by the Public Works Department for baseline year 2023. Material composition data for the state’s overall disposed waste stream was obtained from the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) and applied to the City’s total tonnage for 2023.22 Landfill emission factors for each waste type were provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Waste Reduction Model (WARM).23 The landfill gas collection efficiency and oxidation rate were assumed to be 75% and 10%, respectively, consistent with the U.S. Community Protocol assumptions.24 Table 9 outlines annual generation and related GHG emissions from communitywide solid waste within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023.

19 City of Costa Mesa. 2021. Wastewater Master Plan Update for the Costa Mesa Sanitary District. November 8. https://cms9files.revize.com/cmsd/Document_Center/Sewer/Sewer%20System%20Information/ 2022_08_29_sewer_master_plan_red_size.pdf.
20 OCSAN. 2024. Regional Sewer Service: Facts and Key Statistics. https://www.ocsan.gov/regional-sewer-service/. 21 CARB. 2024. Annual Summary of GHG Emissions Data. November 15. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ mrr-data.
22 CalRecycle. 2021. 2021 Disposal-Facility-Based Characterization of Solid Waste in California (DRRR-2024-1737). https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/Publications/Details/1738. 23 EPA. 2023. Documentation for GHG Emission and Energy Factors Used in the Waste Reduction Model (WARM).

December. https://www.epa.gov/warm/documentation-chapters-greenhouse-gas-emission-energy-and- economic-factors-used-waste.
24 ICLEI. 2019. U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of GHG Emissions. July. -127-
257
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-11 Table 9. 2023 Communitywide Solid Waste Activity Data and Emissions Land Use Type Annual Tons MT CO 2e
Residential 15,171 2,079
Non-Residential 58,806 8,061
Total 67,183 10,140
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Totals may not sum due to rounding.

Off-Road Equipment
Use of off-road equipment generates GHG emissions from the combustion of fuel such as diesel, gasoline, or natural gas.25 Examples of off-road equipment include forklifts for industrial uses, excavators for construction, lawn mowers for lawn and garden maintenance, and all- terrain vehicles for recreation. The following off-road categories are included in the Costa Mesa community inventory:
• Agricultural Equipment
• Transport Refrigeration Units
• Construction
• Industrial
• Lawn and Garden
• Light Commercial
• Pleasure Craft
• Recreational
• Portable Equipment
Annual emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O were estimated using the CARB OFFROAD model, which provides data at the county level.26 For CO2, OFFROAD provides an estimated total tons of CO2 per day, which was converted to MT of CO2 per year. For CH4 and N2O, emissions were estimated using the OFFROAD fuel consumption output in gallons per year. The Climate

25 In the industrial category, some equipment like forklifts were assumed to be electric. Emissions related to electricity generation were assumed to be captured by the building energy inventory. 26 CARB develops off-road emissions models for specific equipment categories that align with the applicability and scope of regulatory, incentive, and other air quality programs. A web-based query tool provides access to the latest model outputs across all off-road-equipment categories. For more information about the CARB OFFROAD model, see:
https://offroad.arb.ca.gov/?_gl=1%2aml61no%2a_ga%2aMTQ0MDI5MDYzMi4xNzcxMjY3Mzg1%2a_ga_7M1ZZPX DBL%2aczE3ODQyNDEwNDMkbzE4JGcwJHQxNzg0MjQxMDQ4JGo1NSRsMCRoMA. -128-
258
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-12 Registry U.S. default factors for calculating CH4 and N2O emissions from non-highway vehicles were used to convert fuel to annual emissions.

Because the OFFROAD model provides data at the county level, the emissions attributable to the City were determined as a percentage of the county’s total emissions, based on population, service population, or employment depending on equipment type.

While the City does not designate agricultural zoning, limited agricultural production occurs within the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. As such, for agricultural equipment, City emissions were determined as a percentage of the County’s total emissions, based on total acreage of agricultural land within the County, which was obtained from the USDA’s Census of Agriculture27, and City, which was obtained from the City’s General Plan Land Use Element28.

Annual fuel use and GHG emissions from off-road equipment use within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023 are provided in Table 10.

Table 10. 2023 Communitywide Off-Road Equipment Activity Data and Emissions Equipment Type
Annual Fuel Use (gallons)
MT CO 2e Gasoline Diesel Natural Gas
Agricultural Equipment 16 516 N/A 6
Transport Refrigeration Units N/A 120,905 N/A 1,252
Construction 47,086 643,813 N/A 6,943
Industrial 513,855 123,437 930,259 11,089
Lawn and Garden 315,327 5,980 N/A 1,991
Light Commercial 646,919 78,718 81,746 5,206
Pleasure Craft 244,022 N/A N/A 1,622
Recreation 3,227 N/A N/A 26
Portable Equipment N/A 622,314 N/A 6,858
Total 1,770,434 1,635,166 1,012,004 34,993
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent; N/A = not applicable.

Totals may not sum due to rounding.

27 USDA. 2024. 2022 Census of Agriculture County Profile: Orange County California. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/Online_Resources/County_Profiles/California/ cp06059.pdf.
28 City of Costa Mesa. 2025. Costa Mesa General Plan Chapter 2: Land Use Element. Updated February 5. https://www.costamesaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/59580/638767695525970000. -129-
259
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-13 Municipal Emissions Inventory
The municipal inventory is limited to the facilities, equipment, vehicles that the City owns and/or operates as well as the trips related to employee commute. It is important to note that the municipal inventory has substantial overlap with the communitywide inventory; for example, mobile emissions from employee commute are captured in the on-road transportation emissions within the communitywide inventory. As such, the municipal inventory is treated separately and not simply combined with the communitywide inventory. Municipal inventories are beneficial in addressing City-controlled emission sources. The primary purpose of a municipal inventory is to “lead by example” and develop reduction measures associated with City activities and operations.

Table 11 provides a summary of the City’s municipal GHG emissions inventory for baseline year 2023 by sector.

Table 11. 2023 Municipal Baseline Inventory
Sector MT CO 2e Percent of Total
On-Road Transportation 2,373 60%
Energy 1,332 33%
Water/Wastewater 1 <1%
Solid Waste 95 2%
Off-Road Equipment 183 5%
Total 3,983 100%
Notes: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Percentage may not total due to rounding.

On-Road Transportation
The municipal on-road transportation inventory accounts for mobile source emissions from City-owned vehicle fleet and City employee commutes. Fuel consumption, mileage, and vehicle specifications (i.e., make, model, and year) were provided by the City for the entire vehicle fleet for 2023. City employee commute activity data (i.e., distance, commute frequency, and mode of transportation) was obtained from the Costa Mesa employee commuter survey.
-130-
260
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-14 Fuel-specific CO2 emission factors obtained from The Climate Registry were used to estimate CO2 emissions from the City’s vehicle fleet.29 Vehicle emission factors for employee commute and CH4 and N2O for the City’s vehicle fleet were calculated using EMFAC.

Annual GHG emissions from municipal on-road transportation for baseline year 2023 are provided in Table 12.

Table 12. 2023 Municipal On-Road Transportation Emissions Source MT CO 2e Percent of Total
Vehicle Fleet 796 32%
Employee Commute 1,667 68%
Total 2,463 100%
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Energy
The municipal energy inventory includes emissions from electricity use for City-owned buildings, facilities, and streetlights, as well as natural gas usage at City-owned buildings and facilities.

Annual GHG emissions from municipal energy use in the City for baseline year 2023 are provided in Table 13.

Table 13. 2023 Municipal Energy Emissions
Source MT CO 2e Percent of Total
Electricity 1,441 83%
Natural Gas 296 17%
Total 1,737 100%
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

ELECTRICITY
Annual municipal energy use for 2023 was provided by the City, and GHG emission intensity factors were obtained from the SCE 2023 Power Content Label, consistent with the communitywide inventory. Table 14 outlines annual consumption and related GHG emissions from municipal electricity use within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023.

29 The Climate Registry 2023, Default Emission Factors. -131-
261
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-15 Table 14. 2023 Municipal Electricity Activity Data and Emissions Source Annual MWh MT CO 2e
Municipal Facilities 6,491 1,441
Notes: MWh= megawatt-hour; MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Totals may not sum due to rounding.

NATURAL GAS
Annual natural gas consumption for City-owned buildings and facilities was provided by the City for baseline year 2023. Natural gas emission factors for CO2, CH4, and N2O were obtained from The Climate Registry and applied to annual consumption data to estimate emissions.

Table 15 outlines annual consumption and related GHG emissions from municipal natural gas use within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023.

Table 15. 2023 Municipal Natural Gas Activity Data and Emissions Source Annual Therms MT CO 2e
Municipal Facilities 55,654 296
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Water and Wastewater
Similar to the communitywide inventory, municipal GHG emissions associated with water use come from the electricity consumed in the extraction (e.g., groundwater pumping), conveyance, treatment, and distribution of potable water to City-owned and/or -operated buildings and facilities (including landscaping). Total annual water use for City-owned buildings and facilities was provided by IRWD and Mesa Water District for baseline year 2023.

Local utility emission factors from SCE for the baseline year 2023 were applied to the energy estimated for the City’s groundwater extraction, while eGRID factors were applied to water imports. Energy intensity factors for water supply were obtained from the IRWD and Mesa Water District 2020 Urban Water Management Plans (UWMP).30,31

30 IRWD. 2021. IRWD – 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. June. https://www.irwd.com/images/pdf/doing- business/environmental-
documents/UWMP/2020_urban_water_management_plan_irwd_adopted_june2021.pdf. 31 Mesa Water District. 2021. Mesa Water District 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. June. https://www.mesawater.org/sites/default/files/Save%20Water/Documents/Mesa%20Water%202020%20UWMP% 20FINAL-2021.06.30.pdf.
-132-
262
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-16 Table 16 outlines annual consumption and related GHG emissions from municipal water use within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023.

Table 16. 2023 Municipal Water Use Activity Data and Emissions Source Annual Gallons MT CO 2e
Municipal Water Use 165,125 92
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Solid Waste
The municipal solid waste inventory includes emissions from waste generated by City operations, which was estimated based on an average waste factor from similar jurisdictions in the region.

Consistent with the communitywide inventory, material composition data for the state’s overall disposed waste stream was obtained from CalRecycle and applied to the City’s total tonnage for 2023.32 Landfill emission factors for each waste type were provided by EPA’s WARM.33 Table 17 outlines annual generation and related GHG emissions from municipal solid waste within Costa Mesa for baseline year 2023.

Table 17. 2023 Municipal Solid Waste Activity Data and Emissions Source Annual Tons MT CO 2e
Municipal Solid Waste 195 95
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Off-Road Equipment
Off-road emissions for the municipal inventory include any off-road equipment owned and operated by the City. Fuel consumption and equipment specifications (i.e., make, model, and year) were provided by the City for the entire off-road equipment fleet for 2023. Fuel-specific CO2 emission factors obtained from The Climate Registry were used to estimate CO2 emissions from the City’s vehicle fleet.34

32 CalRecycle. 2021. 2021 Disposal-Facility-Based Characterization of Solid Waste in California (DRRR-2024-1737). https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/Publications/Details/1738. 33 EPA. 2023. Documentation for GHG Emission and Energy Factors Used in the Waste Reduction Model (WARM).

December. https://www.epa.gov/warm/documentation-chapters-greenhouse-gas-emission-energy-and- economic-factors-used-waste.
34 The Climate Registry 2023, Default Emission Factors. -133-
263
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-17 Annual fuel consumption and GHG emissions from municipal off-road equipment for baseline year 2023 are provided in Table 18.

Table 18. 2023 Municipal Off-Road Equipment Activity Data and Emissions Source
Annual Fuel Use
(gallons)
MT CO 2e Gasoline Diesel
Municipal Off-Road Equipment 602 17,029 183
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Forecasts
Forecasting future GHG emissions allows the City to understand how communitywide and municipal emissions are expected to change in the future. GHG emissions are forecasted using two scenarios: a Business-as-Usual (BAU) scenario and an Adjusted Business-as-Usual (ABAU) scenario. The BAU and ABAU projections are both based on the demographic trends discussed in the following section to reflect anticipated growth in the City. • The BAU scenario describes emissions based on projected growth in population, employment, and other factors and does not consider policies that would reduce GHG emissions in the future.
• The ABAU scenario describes emissions based on projected growth and considers policies that will achieve GHG reductions in the future (i.e., assumes federal- and state- mandated GHG emission reduction measures would be implemented by the projected forecast year). The ABAU, unlike the BAU, accounts for adopted GHG emissions reductions because of regulations that would be implemented between the 2023 baseline year and 2030 and 2045.

By estimating emissions forecasts under these two scenarios, the City can evaluate the effect that existing policies may have on future emissions and determine which local measures would provide additional reductions. The additional reductions needed at the local level can also be estimated based on the emission reductions necessary between the “gap” of the ABAU inventory and the state-aligned reduction targets.

Demographic Trends
Demographic trends are important factors in developing the CAAP because they enable projections, or forecasting, of GHG emissions based on changes anticipated for the City. For example, if residential population is anticipated to increase within a community, GHG -134-
264
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-18 emissions associated with residential population would also increase when not considering other variables that would change the GHG emissions profile.

Forecast years selected for this CAAP include 2030 and 2045. Table 20 outlines the City’s baseline 2023 and projected 2030 and 2045 metrics for population, households, employment, and VMT, which were used to project future emissions within the City. Forecasts of VMT are consistent with anticipated demographic changes and reflect the City’s current upzoning efforts, including the Neighborhoods Where We Belong initiative, which is expected to add up to approximately 21,000 housing units. These additional units were incorporated into the population, household, and employment projections used to estimate future emissions.

As noted in Table 20, forecasting for on-road transportation is based on VMT; building energy was forecasted based on the projected number of households for residential energy use and on projected employment for commercial and industrial energy use; and GHG emissions related to water, wastewater, and solid waste were forecasted based on population.

Metrics for off-road equipment are not included in Table 19 because the GHG emissions for this sector were forecasted without using demographic trends. GHG emissions related to off-road equipment were forecasted using the CARB OFFROAD model, based on City-specific criteria within the model.

Table 19. City of Costa Mesa Demographic Trends
Demographic
Metric
Applicable
Inventory
Sector(s)
2023
Baseline
Projected
Data
Source 2030 2045
Population
(residents)
Water,
Wastewater,
Solid Waste
126,871 136,626 157,530 Fehr & Peersa
Employment
(employees)
None 116,858 120,145 127,189 Fehr & Peersa
Service Population
(residents +
employees)
Energy (Non-
Residential)
243,730 256,772 284,719 Fehr & Peersa
Households Energy
(Residential)
49,146 54,311 65,379 Fehr & Peersa
Daily VMT On-Road
Transportation
3,883,824 3,927,159 4,020,022 Fehr & Peersa
Notes: SCAG = Southern California Association of Governments; VMT = vehicle miles traveled. -135-
265
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-19 a Fehr & Peers. 2026. Costa Mesa Climate Action & Adaptation Plan (CAAP) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Methodology and Inventory Summary. April 3.

Business-as-Usual Inventory Forecasts
The City’s communitywide BAU GHG emissions forecasts for future years 2030 and 2045 are outlined in Table 20. As discussed previously, the BAU forecasts were estimated assuming that emissions would increase in-line with the demographic trends outlined in Table 20 and do not account for policies that would reduce GHG emissions in the future from state or federal legislative action.

Table 20. Communitywide Business-as-Usual Inventory Projections Sector
2023 Baseline 2030 2045
MT CO 2e % MT CO 2e % MT CO 2e %
On-Road
Transportation
551,893 63% 558,051 62% 571,247 59%
Energy 266,921 31% 286,335 32% 327,936 34%
Water 3,767 <1% 4,094 <1% 4,795 <1%
Wastewater 4,686 <1% 5,046 <1% 5,819 <1%
Solid Waste 10,140 1% 10,790 1% 12,182 1%
Off-Road Equipment 34,993 4% 37,531 4% 43,837 5%
Total 872,400 100% 901,847 100% 965,816 100%
Notes: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Percentage may not total due to rounding.

Similarly, Table 21 presents the BAU projections for 2030 and 2045, along with the 2023 baseline, by emission sector for the City’s municipal inventory.

Table 21. Municipal Business-as-Usual Inventory Projections Sector
2023 Baseline 2030 2045
MT CO 2e % MT CO 2e % MT CO 2e %
On-Road
Transportation
2,463 53% 2,595 53% 2,877 53%
Energy 1,737 37% 1,830 37% 2,029 37%
Water/Wastewater 206 4% 217 4% 240 4%
Solid Waste 95 2% 100 2% 107 2%
Off-Road
Equipment
183 4% 192 4% 204 4%
-136-
266
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-20 Table 21. Municipal Business-as-Usual Inventory Projections Sector
2023 Baseline 2030 2045
MT CO 2e % MT CO 2e % MT CO 2e %
Total 4,683 100% 6,118 100% 5,457 100%
Notes: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Percentage may not total due to rounding.

Adjusted Business-as-Usual Forecasts
As noted above, the ABAU scenario describes emissions based on projected growth and considers policies that will achieve GHG reductions in the future. State legislation has been approved and/or adopted that will reduce GHG emissions in Costa Mesa. Federal and state policies do not require additional local action but should be accounted for in the City’s emissions forecasts to provide a more accurate picture of future emissions and the level of local action needed to reduce emissions to levels consistent with state recommendations.

The relevant federal and state policies and related ABAU projection assumptions are detailed in Table 22.

Table 22. Adjusted Business-as-Usual Projection Assumptions Emissions Sector Policies ABAU Assumptions
On-Road Transportation Advanced Clean Cars for model year 2016+
Pavley I federal standard for model
year 2012–2016
Truck and Bus Rule (including the 2014
Amendment)
Heavy-Duty GHG Phase 1 (2013), which
includes the 2013 Tractor-Trailer GHG
Regulation Amendments and Federal
Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium-
and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles
Federal GHG Phase 2 GHG Standards
for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines
and Vehicles
Advanced Clean Trucks
Innovative Clean Transit
Included in EMFAC 2025.a
-137-
267
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-21 Table 22. Adjusted Business-as-Usual Projection Assumptions Emissions Sector Policies ABAU Assumptions
Energy Renewables Portfolio Standard Percent renewable targets for Renewables Portfolio
Standard include the
following:
▪ 60% by 2030 (SB 100)
▪ 90% by 2035 (SB 1020)
▪ 95% by 2040 (SB 1020)
▪ 100% by 2045 (SB 1020)
A revised GHG intensity value
was calculated based on the
2023 Power Content Label
value for SCEb adjusted to
assume a percent of the
power mix would be from
eligible renewables per SB 100
and SB 1020 as appropriate for
2030 and 2045.
2022 Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency
Standards
Energy consumption was
manually adjusted for
electricity and natural gas
assumed to be generated by
development after 2023.

Energy reductions were
assumed based on the
difference in energy use
between the 2019 and 2022
Title 24 code that takes into
account requirements for
heat pump standard design
for single-family, multifamily,
and non-residential, and
photovoltaic and battery
storage for multifamily and
non-residential.c
Water Renewables Portfolio Standard Incorporated into the SCEb GHG intensity for future years
2030 and 2045.
-138-
268
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-22 Table 22. Adjusted Business-as-Usual Projection Assumptions Emissions Sector Policies ABAU Assumptions
Wastewater Renewables Portfolio Standard Incorporated into the SCEb GHG intensity for future years
2030 and 2045.

Solid Waste None N/A
Off-Road Equipment None N/A
Notes: ABAU = Adjusted Business-as-Usual; GHG = greenhouse gas; EMFAC = EMission FACtor; SB = Senate Bill; SCE = Southern California Edison, OCPA = Orange County Power Authority; N/A = not applicable. a CARB. 2021. EMFAC2021 Volume III Technical Documentation . April. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2021-08/emfac2021_technical_documentation_april2021.pdf. b SCE Power Content Label.
c California Energy Commission. 2023. Impact Analysis for the 2022 Update to the California Energy Code. June. https://www.energy.ca.gov/publications/2023/impact-analysis-2022-update-california-energy-code.

The City’s communitywide ABAU GHG emissions forecasts for future years 2030 and 2045 are outlined in Table 23, estimated using the assumptions outlined in Table 22.

Table 23. Communitywide Adjusted Business-as-Usual Inventory Projections Sector
2023 Baseline 2030 2045
MT CO 2e % MT CO 2e % MT CO 2e %
On-Road
Transportation
551,893 63% 428,842 61% 115,488 38%
Energy 266,921 31% 222,914 32% 135,505 44%
Water 3,767 <1% 2,617 <1% 0 0%
Wastewater 4,686 <1% 5,046 <1% 5,819 2%
Solid Waste 10,140 1% 10,790 2% 12,182 4%
Off-Road
Equipment
34,993 4% 37,531 5% 43,837 12%
Total 872,400 100% 707,741 100% 312,831 100%
Notes: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Percentage may not total due to rounding.

Similarly, Table 24 presents the ABAU projections for 2030 and 2045, along with the 2023 baseline, by emission sector for the City’s municipal inventory. -139-
269
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-23 Table 24. Municipal Adjusted Business-as-Usual Inventory Projections Sector
2023 Baseline 2030 2045
MT CO 2e % MT CO 2e % MT CO 2e %
On-Road
Transportation
2,463 53% 2,183 56% 1,306 63%
Energy 1,737 37% 1,285 33% 345 17%
Water/Wastewater 206 4% 182 5% 133 6%
Solid Waste 95 2% 85 2% 92 4%
Off-Road
Equipment
183 4% 181 5% 200 10%
Total 4,683 100% 3,916 100% 2,076 100%
Notes: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Percentage may not total due to rounding.

Target Setting
Reduction targets are set to provide a clearly defined pathway to reduce GHG emissions by a specific amount and by a predetermined date. By establishing a target, the City can identify the amount of GHG emissions it must collectively reduce to meet its climate goals. The City’s reduction targets are informed by the framework of GHG reduction legislation established through state legislation. A summary of the relevant state legislation and programs is provided in the following section.

State Greenhouse Gas Reduction Legislation
The state’s GHG target setting framework has been established through a series of Executive Orders (EOs) and adopted Assembly Bills (ABs) and Senate Bills (SBs). This framework sets the foundation upon which the City’s own target setting is based. The key legislation related to the state’s GHG reduction goals is outlined below.

Executive Order S-3-05 (2005)
EO S-3-05 established California’s GHG emissions reduction targets and outlined responsibilities among the state agencies for implementing the EO and for reporting on progress toward the targets. This EO established the following targets:
• By 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels
• By 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels
• By 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels -140-
270
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-24 Assembly Bill 32 (2006)
In furtherance of the goals established in EO S-3-05, the legislature enacted AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (California Health and Safety Code Sections 38500–38599). AB 32 provided initial direction on creating a comprehensive multiyear program to limit California’s GHG emissions at 1990 levels by 2020 and initiate the transformations required to achieve the state’s long-range climate objectives.

Executive Order B-30-15 (2015)
EO B-30-15 identified an interim GHG-reduction target in support of targets previously identified under EO S-3-05 and AB 32. EO B-30-15 set an interim target goal of reducing GHG emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 to keep California on its trajectory toward meeting or exceeding the long-term goal of reducing GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050, as set forth in EO S-3-05.

Senate Bill 32 (2016)
SB 32 codified the 2030 emissions reduction goal of EO B-30-15 by requiring CARB to ensure that statewide GHG emissions are reduced to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030.

Executive Order B-55-18 (2018)
EO B-55-18 established a statewide policy for the state to achieve carbon neutrality as soon as possible (no later than 2045) and achieve and maintain net-negative emissions thereafter. The goal is an addition to the existing statewide targets of reducing the state’s GHG emissions.

Assembly Bill 1279 (2022)
AB 1279, the California Climate Crisis Act, declared the policy of the state to achieve net-zero GHG emissions as soon as possible, but no later than 2045, and achieve and maintain net- negative GHG emissions thereafter.

Although AB 1279 established an overall policy to achieve net-zero GHG emissions as soon as possible, the legislature recognized the need to implement CO2 removal and carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies. AB 1279 established a specific target of 85% below 1990 levels by 2045 for anthropogenic GHG emissions. Therefore, the net-zero target does not directly apply to the City, but the 2045 target of 85% below 1990 levels represents the reductions required to contribute to accomplishing the state’s overall net-zero policy. -141-
271
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-25 California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan
CARB is charged with monitoring and regulating sources of GHG emissions. Specifically, as outlined by AB 32, CARB is required to prepare a “Scoping Plan” to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emissions reductions in line with state targets (California Health and Safety Code Section 38561[a]). The Scoping Plan is required to be updated every 5 years and requires CARB and other state agencies to adopt regulations and initiatives that will reduce GHG emissions statewide. The first Scoping Plan (Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change) was adopted in 2008 and was updated in 2014, 2017, and 2022.

The 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality outlines the state’s plan to reduce anthropogenic emissions to 85% below 1990 levels by 2045 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2045 or earlier in accordance with AB 1279. The Scoping Plan also assesses the progress the state is making toward reducing GHG emissions by at least 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, as is required by SB 32 and laid out in the Second Update. Furthermore, it indicates that additional reductions are needed by 2030 (i.e., 48% below 1990 levels) for the state to remain on track to achieve net-zero GHG emissions by 2045.

Methodology
The 2022 Scoping Plan includes guidance for jurisdictions on setting local GHG reduction targets and indicates that these targets should support the state’s long-term climate goals established through existing legislation.35 As such, the City’s reduction targets were chosen to align with the relevant reduction goals for future years 2030 and 2045 established by SB 32 and AB 1279, respectively.

The City’s 2030 and 2045 reduction targets align with the statewide Scoping Plan, reflecting the City’s respective share of statewide reductions needed to achieve long-term climate goals. The City’s GHG emission reduction targets were adjusted to be locally appropriate, disaggregating emission sectors from the statewide plan (CARB Scoping Plan) that are not relevant based on local land use, jurisdictional authority, and emission source characteristics.

Where limited emissions associated with an otherwise non-applicable sector occur within the City (e.g., agricultural electricity use or equipment), those emissions are captured within other applicable sectors of the inventory and are not treated as a distinct sector for target-setting.

35 CARB. 2022. 2022 Scoping Plan, Appendix D: Local Actions. November. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/2022-sp-appendix-d-local-actions.pdf. -142-
272
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-26 Table 25 provides a review of the 2022 Scoping Plan emission sectors with an assessment of applicability for the City. As shown, the City has direct or indirect jurisdiction over activities that generate emissions and contribute to reductions in five of the seven Scoping Plan emissions sectors included in the statewide emissions inventory. Four of the seven Scoping Plan emissions sectors are relevant to the municipal inventory and are included in the target-setting for municipal reductions.

Table 25. 2022 Scoping Plan Emissions Sectors Applicability 2022 Scoping
Plan Emissions
Sector Description a
Applicability to City of Costa Mesa
Communitywide Municipal
Transportation The transportation sector
includes emissions from
in-state fuel combustion
by on-road vehicles,
intrastate flights, trains,
waterborne vessels, and
a few other smaller
sources.

Applicable. The City’s
communitywide inventory
includes emissions from
on-road transportation,
consistent with the
calculated VMT.b
Applicable. The City’s
municipal inventory
includes emissions from
on-road transportation,
including employee
commute and vehicle
fleet.

Electric Power Electric power sector
emissions include two
broad categories: in-
state generation
(including the portion of
industrial and
commercial
cogeneration emissions
attributed to electricity
generation) and
imported electricity.

Applicable. The City’s
communitywide inventory
includes emissions from
electricity use, consistent
with the usage
information provided by
SCEc (kWh).

Applicable. The City’s
municipal inventory
includes emissions from
electricity use,
consistent with the
usage information
provided by SCEc
(kWh).

Industrial Emissions in this sector
are primarily driven by
fuel combustion from
sources that include
refineries, oil and gas
production, cement
plants, and the portion
of cogeneration
emissions attributed to
thermal energy output.

Applicable. The City’s
communitywide inventory
includes emissions from
industrial energy use,
consistent with the usage
information provided by
SCE (kWh) and
SoCalGasd (therms).

Not Applicable. The
City’s municipal
operations do not
include activities or
emissions from industrial
sources.
-143-
273
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-27 Table 25. 2022 Scoping Plan Emissions Sectors Applicability 2022 Scoping
Plan Emissions
Sector Description a
Applicability to City of Costa Mesa
Communitywide Municipal
Commercial and
Residential
Greenhouse gas
emissions from the
commercial and
residential sector come
predominantly from the
combustion of fossil gas
and other fuels for uses
such as space heating,
cooking, water heating,
and steam generation.

Applicable. The City’s
communitywide inventory
includes emissions from
residential and
commercial natural gas
use, consistent with the
usage information
provided by SoCalGasd
(therms).

Applicable. The City’s
municipal inventory
includes emissions from
commercial natural
gas use, consistent with
the usage information
provided by SoCalGasd
(therms).

Agriculture Major emissions sources
in the agricultural sector
include enteric
fermentation and
manure management
from livestock, crop
production (fertilizer use,
soil preparation and
disturbance, and crop
residue burning), and
fuel combustion (water
pumping, heating
buildings, processing
commodities, and
tractors).

Not Applicable. The City
does not have
agricultural production
activities or emissions
sources consistent with
the CARB‑defined
Agriculture sector. Limited
emissions associated with
electricity consumption or
off‑road equipment
attributed to agricultural
uses are captured within
the Electric Power and
Off‑Road Equipment
sectors of the
community‑wide
inventory and are
therefore not included as
a standalone Agriculture
sector for target‑setting
purposes.

Not applicable. The
City’s municipal
inventory does not
include sources of
agricultural emissions.

High Global
Warming Potential
High GWP emissions
include releases of
ozone-depleting
substance substitutes,
sulfur hexafluoride
emissions from the
Not Applicable. The City
does not have
jurisdictional control or
ability to influence
emissions from the
electricity transmission
Not Applicable. The
City does not have
jurisdictional control or
ability to influence
emissions from the
electricity transmission
-144-
274
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-28 Table 25. 2022 Scoping Plan Emissions Sectors Applicability 2022 Scoping
Plan Emissions
Sector Description a
Applicability to City of Costa Mesa
Communitywide Municipal
electricity transmission
and distribution system,
and emissions from
semiconductor
manufacturing.
and distribution system or
from semiconductor
manufacturing.
and distribution system
or from semiconductor
manufacturing.

Recycling and
Waste
Emissions from the
recycling and waste
sector include CH4 and
N2O emissions from
landfills and
commercial-scale
composting.

Applicable. The City’s
communitywide inventory
includes emissions from
recycling and waste,
consistent with the usage
information provided by
the City and the EPA
WARM model.e
Applicable. The City’s
municipal inventory
includes emissions from
recycling and waste,
consistent with the
usage information
estimated based on
generation rates for
similar regional
jurisdictions.

Notes: VMT = vehicle miles traveled; SCE = Southern California Edison; kWh = kilowatt -hour; SoCalGas = Southern California Gas Company; GWP = global warming potential; CH 4 = methane; N 2O = nitrous oxide; CalRecycle = California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. a CARB. 2025. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions from 2000 to 2023: Trends of Emissions and Other Indicators.

November 4. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2025-11/nc-2000_2023_ghg_inventory_trends.pdf. b Fehr & Peers. 2026. Costa Mesa Climate Action & Adaptation Plan (CAAP) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Methodology and Inventory Summary. April 3.
c SCE. 2025. 2023 City of Costa Mesa Community Electricity Usage. d SoCalGas. 2025. 2023 City of Costa Mesa Community Natural Gas Usage. e EPA. 2023. Documentation for GHG Emission and Energy Factors Used in the Waste Reduction Model (WARM).

December. https://www.epa.gov/warm/documentation-chapters-greenhouse-gas-emission-energy-and- economic-factors-used-waste.

In instances where the statewide emissions inventory included emissions sectors not relevant to the City (i.e., Agriculture and High Global Warming Potential), these sectors and related emissions were disaggregated from the statewide GHG emissions inventory and Scoping Plan projections. Table 26 outlines the adjusted statewide reduction targets when only including sectors relevant to the City.

As shown in Table 26, when adjusting for only the relevant sectors, the reduction targets (percent below current levels) for 2030 and 2045 are 36.6% and 86.9%, respectively. The statewide emissions used here assume implementation of the Scoping Plan Scenario, as outlined in the 2022 CARB Scoping Plan. As discussed previously, this scenario accounts for -145-
275
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-29 additional reductions needed by 2030 (i.e., 48% below 1990 levels36) for the state to remain on track to achieve net-zero GHG emissions by 2045.

Table 26. Adjusted Statewide Emissions Reductions
Sector
Statewide Inventory a
(MMT CO 2e)
CARB Scoping Plan Scenario b
(MMT CO 2e)
202 3 2030 2045
Transportation 134 81 8
Electric Power 57 39 9
Industrialc 67 41 12
Commercial and Residential 43 27 4
Recycling and Waste 9 9 8
Total Adjusted Emissions
Communitywide Sectors 310 196 41
Municipal Sectors 243 156 29
Emission Reduction Target (percent below current levels) Communitywide N/A 36.6% 86.9%
Municipal N/A 35.8% 88.0%
Notes: MMT CO 2e = million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent ; CARB = California Air Resources Board ; N/A = not applicable.
a Statewide inventory data was obtained from CARB’s current trends report data.37 b Statewide emission projections were obtained from CARB’s Scoping Plan Scenario modeling.38 c Per results of Table 25, the industrial sector is not relevant to the municipal inventory and was therefore not included in the municipal target-setting.

City of Costa Mesa Reduction Targets
As discussed above, the City’s CAAP is developed to align with the goals of SB 32 and AB 1279 for future years 2030 and 2045, respectively. Table 27 outlines the City’s communitywide and municipal GHG reduction targets, which were estimated using the percentage reductions calculated from the adjusted CARB statewide inventory and Scoping Plan Scenario projections in Table 26. Given that the Scoping Plan Scenario projections were modeled to

36 The 48% below 1990 levels is CARB’s mathematical benchmark (i.e., interpolated value) between 2022 and 2045 to achieve AB 1279 GHG emission reduction targets and does not supplant the established SB 32 2030 GHG emission reduction target of 40% below 1990 levels. 37 CARB. 2025. Current California GHG Emission Inventory Data 2000-2023. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ ghg-inventory-data.
38 CARB. 2022. CARB Scoping Plan Model Outputs. November 14. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/ab- 32-climate-change-scoping-plan/2022-scoping-plan-documents. -146-
276
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-30 demonstrate achievement of the relevant future state legislative targets for 2030 and 2045, aligning the City reduction targets with these adjusted percentages will ensure that the City is doing its fair share in helping the state reach its SB 32 and AB 1279 reduction goals.

Table 27. Communitywide 2030 and 2045 Reduction Targets Inventory
Baseline Reduction Target (MT CO 2e)
2023 2030 2045
Communitywide 872,400 36.6% below baseline:
553,029

86.9% below baseline:
114,190
Municipal 4,683 35.8% below baseline:
3,005

88.0% below baseline:
560
Note: MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Tables 28 and 29 compare the City’s GHG reduction targets to the ABAU emissions projections for communitywide and municipal, respectively. The 2030 and 2045 emissions targets outlined in Tables 28 and 29 are presented with the projected ABAU emissions and remaining GHG reductions needed to meet targets, referred to as the “local gap.” Table 28. Communitywide 2030 and 2045 ABAU Emissions and Reduction Targets Sector
GHG Emissions (MT CO 2e)
2030 2045
ABAU 707,741 312,831
Percent Below Baseline Level (%) 36.6% 86.9%
Target 553,029 114,190
Local Gap 154,711 198,642
Notes: ABAU = adjusted business-as-usual; GHG = greenhouse gas; MT CO2e = metric tons CO2e.

Table 29. Municipal 2030 and 2045 ABAU Emissions and Reduction Targets Sector
GHG Emissions (MT CO 2e)
2030 2045
ABAU 3,916 2,076
Percent Below Baseline Level (%) 35.8% 88.0%
Target 3,005 560
Local Gap 911 1,516
Notes: ABAU = adjusted business-as-usual; MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Totals may not sum due to rounding.
-147-
277
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-31 Summary
The City’s baseline inventory estimates indicate that activities related to transportation and energy use are the largest source of communitywide and municipal emissions and will continue to be in future years. GHG emissions from on-road transportation account for the majority of emissions in both the communitywide (63%) and municipal (53%) baseline inventories, followed by emissions related to energy use, which account for 31% and 37% of the communitywide and municipal inventories, respectively. The BAU inventory forecasts indicate that when accounting only for population and employment growth within Costa Mesa, these trends will continue into 2030 and 2045.

As shown with the ABAU inventory forecasts, state legislative actions will result in meaningful reductions from the City’s GHG emissions in future years. Overall, legislative actions will achieve approximately 22% reductions in 2030 and 67% reductions in 2045 from the communitywide BAU scenario. These reductions are due to state programs to advance renewable energy procurement (i.e., Renewables Portfolio Standard) and regulations to scale down emissions from vehicles (e.g., CARB’s Advanced Clean Cars package of regulations).

Summaries of the City’s ABAU emissions, state-aligned reduction targets, and local gap are provided in Figure 1 (communitywide) and Figure 2 (municipal). As shown, while state legislative actions would account for a meaningful portion of the reductions needed to achieve the City’s 2030 and 2045 GHG emissions reduction goals; legislative actions on their own would not be adequate to achieve the City’s goals. To close the local gap and meet the specified targets, the City will need to implement additional actions to achieve reductions of approximately 154,711 MT CO2e by 2030 and 198,642 MT CO2e by 2045 within the community.

At the municipal level, the City will need to implement actions to achieve reductions of approximately 911 MT CO2e by 2030 and 1,516 MT CO2e by 2045.

-148-
278
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-32

0 200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
2023 2030 2045
GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)
Year
Costa Mesa ABAU Community Emissions Forecast
Transportation Energy Water
Solid Waste Off-Road BAU Trend
State-Aligned Targets
Figure 1. Communitywide Adjusted Business-as-Usual Emissions and Reduction Targets.
o
-149-
279
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-33

0 1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
2023 2030 2045
GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)
Year
Costa Mesa ABAU Municipal Emissions Forecast
Transportation Energy Water
Solid Waste Off-Road BAU Trend
State-Aligned Targets
Figure 2. Municipal Adjusted Business-as-Usual Emissions and Reduction Targets. o
-150-
280
APPENDIX A – GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY, FORECASTING, AND TARGET SETTING

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 A-34

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-151-
281

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-1

APPENDIX B

CLIMATE

VULNERABILITY

ASSESSMENT
-152-
282

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-1 Climate Vulnerability Assessment
This Climate Vulnerability Assessment describes a detailed understanding of risk (for bolded words, refer to callout definitions below) relative to how community members experience climate-related hazards. It provides context about the City of Costa Mesa’s (the City’s) residents, built and natural environment, programming, and resources. It details current and projected climate-related hazards and discusses specific anticipated impacts. The Climate Vulnerability Assessment will be summarized within the adaptation chapter of the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) and will inform the development of climate adaptation policies within the CAAP. It may also serve as a resource for future city initiatives and provide a baseline for tracking changes over time.
• Risk
- Risk considers the overall potential impact of climate-related hazards. It accounts for a community’s potential exposure to climate-related hazards in combination with social or environmental factors that exist within the community and can heighten or reduce the impacts of climate-related hazards.
• Climate-related Hazards
- Climate-related hazards are natural hazards that are impacted by climate characteristics like temperature and precipitation. Climate characteristics are projected to change as a result of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.1 - The City experiences the following climate-related hazards: drought, extreme heat, fire, and flooding. Compounding hazards, which lead to additional impacts like debris/mud flows or climate migration (people moving as a result of climate-related hazards), will also be considered.
• Climate Adaptation
- This refers to activities that reduce risks from climate-related hazards, such as infrastructure improvements, hazard preparedness education, or recovery pre-planning.

Relationship to Other Planning Documents
The City and applicable partner agencies have addressed natural hazards and climate adaptation through several existing plans. These plans respond to varying state and federal requirements, and their development is led by different agencies or departments. The CAAP adaptation strategy builds off these plans by utilizing existing background information and maintaining consistency with existing goals, policies, and programs that dictate local department and partner agency actions. Additionally, this CAAP intends to further City policy

1 International Panel on Climate Change (2021) “Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis.” https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/.
-153-
283

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-2 to address areas where existing policies can be built upon or where gaps exist. The related plans are described below.

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
The 2022 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) is a strategic document intended to reduce or eliminate the impact of human-caused hazards (for example aircraft crashes) and natural hazards (including climate-related hazards, as well as other natural hazards like earthquakes).2 The LHMP identifies hazards that have the potential to impact the City, outlines the vulnerability and risk associated with those hazards, and provides strategies to address hazards. City staff implement the LHMP’s programs over time and report on progress during plan updates. The LHMP is updated every 5 years to retain certification and ensure the City is eligible to receive federal, pre-hazard mitigation funding. The LHMP informs the CAAP by providing relevant vulnerability and hazard information, and programs that can be incorporated into the CAAP’s policies.

General Plan
The City’s General Plan serves as the official “blueprint” for long-range planning. It establishes the overall vision for the City, including current issues, changing conditions, and long-term community priorities for the 20-year planning horizon (as of the writing of this assessment, the planning horizon is 2035).3
Within the General Plan, the Safety Element has policies and programs to address hazards.4 This element incorporates the LHMP by reference, which allows for it to work seamlessly with the LHMP and fulfills certain state disaster relief funding requirements. City staff implement the Safety Element policies and programs over time, though policies are often higher-level than those included within the LHMP due to the guiding nature of the General Plan. The CAAP will retain consistency with, expand, and refine the climate adaptation analysis and policies provided in the Safety Element to offer more specific implementation guidance.

2 City of Costa Mesa. 2022. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Accessed August 1, 2025. https://www.costamesaca.gov/government/departments-and-divisions/the-office-of-emergency- management/local-hazard-mitigation-plan.
3 City of Costa Mesa. 2016. 2015-2035 General Plan. https://www.costamesaca.gov/government/ departments-and-divisions/economic-and-development-services/planning/general-plan/ 2015-2035-general-plan.
4 City of Costa Mesa. 2016. Safety Element. https://www.costamesaca.gov/home/ showpublisheddocument/34702/636740022576330000.
-154-
284

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-3 While the Safety Element is the most important element for this Climate Vulnerability Assessment, other elements of the General Plan discuss relevant topics that can be valuable to inform adaptation policy. For example, the Housing Element provides information on housing characteristics in the community, and that’s relevant information because people often shelter from climate-related hazards in their homes. Depending on the dwelling’s characteristics, residents may require different behaviors to withstand hazards (people without A/C may open windows or take cool showers during extreme heat events), while others may face barriers to making resilience improvements (i.e., renters may have limited control or incentive to install insulated windows or cool roofs).

Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan The City has two water providers, Mesa Water District and Irvine Ranch Water District. Each district develops plans to address effective water management and consistent water supply in the face of drought.

Urban Water Management Plans (UWMP) assess the reliability of the water supply and drought risk and outline the approach to proactively plan for water supply.5, 6 Key elements of a UWMP include efficient use of urban water supplies, water conservation programs, and other policies.

In addition, UWMPs assess water reliability given normal and dry year scenarios. These plans are updated every 5 years and approved by the California Department of Water Resources.

They serve as a way to regulate and benchmark water providers. Water providers implement the programs outlined in Urban Water Management Plans.

Water providers also have Water Shortage Contingency Plans (WSCP) as part of Urban Water Management Plans. WSCPs provide steps for the water provider to assess if a water shortage is occurring, outline appropriate actions based on the level of shortage, and provide implementation details such as communications planning, monitoring and enforcement.

UWMPs and WSCPs provide relevant water supply data and policies that the CAAP will support.

5 Mesa Water. 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. https://www.mesawater.org/sites/ default/files/Save%20Water/Documents/Mesa%20Water%202020%20UWMP%20FINAL-2021.06.30.pdf. 6 Irvine Ranch Water District. 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. -155-
285

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-4 Community Insights
The following section describes aspects of the City’s community members, society, and the natural and built environment. These characteristics can impact how climate-related hazards affect groups of people and areas of the City. By identifying which groups or regions may be more vulnerable, more effective and equitable adaptation strategies can be developed.

This assessment’s Hazard Analysis Section considers how these community insights interact with climate-related hazards to impact the City. The Recommendations Section concludes specific policy interventions to limit impacts throughout the community and considers local nuances and existing programs to ensure that gaps are addressed.

Environmental Health Burdens
Environmental health burdens refer to a combination of socioeconomic, health, and environmental factors which can culminate into disproportionately vulnerable communities to the impacts of pollution. The State uses the CalEnviroScreen 4.0 tool to understand a community’s overall environmental health burden. Environmental health burdens can be exacerbated by climate-related hazards, widening the disproportionate burdens experienced. According to the EPA “the most severe harms from climate change fall disproportionately upon underserved communities who are least able to prepare for, and recover from, heat waves, poor air quality, flooding, and other impacts.” 7 As such, this section examines the environmental health burdens within the City. • CalEnviroScreen 4.0
- CalEnviroScreen 4.0 is a tool developed by the State of California that combines socioeconomic, health, and environmental factors into a single score for each census tract throughout the state. This presents a relative evaluation of local conditions compared to state averages.

Census tracts that rank in the 75% or higher across California for environmental burden are considered disadvantaged communities (DACs), as are communities considered disadvantaged by the previous state tool, CalEnviroScreen 3.0, and communities that have demographic data gaps but rank in the highest 5% statewide for pollution.

7 EPA. 2021. “EPA Report Shows Disproportionate Impacts of Climate Change on Socially Vulnerable Populations in the United States.” Accessed July 18, 2025. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-report-shows- disproportionate-impacts-climate-change-socially-vulnerable. -156-
286

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-5 Based on this state definition for DACs, two census tracts in southern Costa Mesa are considered DACs (see Figure 1), bounded approximately by 19th Street to the North, 16th Street to the South, Newport Boulevard to the East, and the City’s city limits to the West. Northeast of the identified DACs are some of the next most disadvantaged areas of the City per CalEnviroScreen 4.0. Other tracts throughout the City are generally less environmentally burdened than the average tract in the state.

The City’s DACs include a mix of commercial, housing, and industrial land uses. Within the DACs, hazardous waste, cleanup sites, and groundwater threats are the biggest pollution issues present, while poverty and housing burden are the biggest socioeconomic issues.

Figure 1. Disadvantaged Communities per CalEnviroScreen 4.0

Source: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2021. CalEnviroScreen 4.0: California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool. California Environmental Protection Agency. https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40.

-157-
287

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-6 Housing
Many climate-related hazards are experienced from home, making certain characteristics of homes important to climate adaptation. For example, when a heat wave is occurring, the cost of electricity may limit a household’s choice or ability to run air conditioning. Further, homeownership status is another characteristic that can create limitations or differences for making home retrofits like weatherization upgrades.

Housing Problems
The City’s General Plan Housing Element outlines the following housing problems and severe housing problems:
• Units with physical defects, such as lacking complete kitchen or bathroom, are considered a severe housing problem.
• Overcrowded conditions are a housing problem defined as housing units with more than one person per room excluding bathrooms and kitchens. Severe overcrowding occurs when more than 1.5 people reside per room.
• Housing cost burden is considered a housing problem when housing costs (including utilities) exceed 30% of gross income. Severe housing cost burden occurs when housing costs exceed 50%of gross income.

Nearly half of lower income households in the city (46.5%) experience at least 1 housing problem. Further, just over a quarter of lower income households (28.2%) experience a severe housing problem.8 The City’s Housing Element includes a variety of policies and programs that are intended to address housing problems.

Renters and Homeowners
Renters and homeowners in the City generally have different experiences with housing problems. Renter-occupied housing units are more commonly overcrowded and severely overcrowded in comparison to owner occupied units. Renters are also more prone to overpayment in the City, with nearly half of renters (48.8%) being housing burdened, while closer to a third of homeowners (31.8%) are housing burdened.9 These issues are important because nearly 60% of housing units in the City are occupied by renters.

8 City of Costa Mesa. 2023. Housing Element. https://www.costamesaca.gov/government/departments-and- divisions/economic-and-development-services/planning/housing-element-update. 9 Ibid.
-158-
288

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-7 People Experiencing Homelessness
Community members experiencing homelessness can be especially vulnerable to climate- related hazards due to their heightened exposure to the elements. According to the 2024 Point-in-Time count, there were 297 individuals experiencing homelessness in the City, an increase of 43% from the 2022 count. The cause of the increase is difficult to pinpoint, because of the many factors that contribute to a person experiencing homelessness. 10 The City has created a comprehensive system of care for both those experiencing homelessness and those at risk of homelessness.11 The City seeks housing for residents, conducts outreach and enforcement throughout the community, and publicizes and coordinates with a network of local and regional organizations offering resources and aid for those in need,.12 Further, Costa Mesa and Newport Beach jointly fund the Costa Mesa Bridge Shelter, opened in 2021, to serve those experiencing homelessness, sheltering approximately a quarter of community members in the City experiencing homelessness. As of June 30, 2026, Newport Beach exited all their guests from the Bridge Shelter. Additionally, the Costa Mesa Street Medicine Program launched in 2024 and provides comprehensive health care to individuals experiencing homelessness. This program is a collaboration between CalOptima Heath, the City, and community partner Celebrating Life Community Health Center.13 In anticipation of moderate to heavy precipitation, the City coordinates in partnership with Lighthouse Church to activate an inclement weather shelter. When activated, the shelter is opened at 8 AM and takes up to 40 individuals at a time, running for 24 hours a day and providing people with accommodations to rest or sleep, three meals per day, and access to restrooms and showers. When available, the Street Medicine vendor is on-site to provide voluntary primary and behavioral health care services, while City Outreach stops by throughout the day to provide case management services.

10 Orange County. 2024. “Everyone Counts: 2024 Point in Time Summary.” https://unitedtoendhomelessness.org/ wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2024-Point-In-Time-Count-Summary-FINAL.pdf. 11 City of Costa Mesa. 2025. “History of Addressing Homelessness in Costa Mesa.” https://www.costamesaca.gov/ government/departments-and-divisions/city-manager-s-office/network-for-homeless-solutions/frequently- asked-questions-faqs/addressing-homelessness.
12 City of Costa Mesa. 2025. “Resources and Getting Help” https://www.costamesaca.gov/government/ departments-and-divisions/city-manager-s-office/network-for-homeless-solutions/resources-getting-help. 13 CalOptima Health. 2024. “CalOptima Health Launches Street Medicine Program in Costa Mesa with Community Health Center Partner.” https://www.caloptima.org/en/about-us/press-releases/caloptima-health- launches-street-medicine-program-in-costa-mesa-with-community-health-center-partner. -159-
289

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-8 Physiological Characteristics
Physiological characteristics refer to the physical and biological traits of individuals, which can influence their health and well-being. Many physiological characteristics, such as age or chronic health conditions, can make a person more susceptible to experiencing health issues during hazard events. Table 1, below, shows rates of various conditions and age demographics in the City compared to the County and State. When considering citywide rates, all physiological conditions considered are less prevalent in the City compared to the State average. Rates of these physiological characteristics are generally evenly distributed throughout the City.

Table 1. Physiological Characteristics in Costa Mesa
Physiological
Characteristic
Rate of Physiological Characteristics
Costa Mesa Orange County California
Heart Disease 4.44% 4.84% 5.16%
Asthma 8.71% 8.32% 9.08%
Older Adults (age
65 and above)

11.2% 14.3% 14.0%
Young Children
(age 5 or below)

5.77% 5.93% 6.30%
Disability 3.15% 3.21% 4.04%
Source: Public Health Alliance of Southern California. 2018. Healthy Places Index. https://map.healthyplacesindex.org/.

Socioeconomic Characteristics
Socioeconomic characteristics refer to the social and economic factors that influence and describe the conditions of individuals, households, or communities. These characteristics can impact resident behavior in a variety of ways that alter day-to-day hazard experiences. For example, economic characteristics like job type or income can lead to increased exposure to climate-related hazards or limitations on an individual’s ability to respond to climate-related hazards.

Poverty and Unemployment
Poverty refers to the state in which individuals or households lack adequate income to meet basic needs such as food, housing, and healthcare. Unemployment is the state of actively seeking but being unable to find employment. Both indicators are commonly used to understand a community’s economic well-being. When individuals are unemployed or living below the poverty limit they may be unable to adequately respond or recover from climate- related hazards as a result of economic hardship and tradeoffs with other daily necessities. -160-
290

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-9 Unemployment and poverty rates in the City are on par for the region and are better than the State (see Table 2). Higher poverty rates are concentrated in a portion of southern Costa Mesa bounded approximately by Placentia Avenue on the west, 16th Street and Newport Boulevard on the south, Harbor Boulevard on the east, and Wilson Street on the north.

Unemployment rates are relatively evenly distributed throughout the City. • Poverty
- The federal poverty level in 2025 is $15,650 for an individual, but due to California’s high cost of living, poverty rates within this document are defined as 200% of the federal poverty level, or $31,300 for an individual.

Outdoor Workers
People who work outside regularly experience climate-related hazards like air pollution or extreme heat more often. In the City, outdoor workers are primarily employed in the construction industry. The rate of outdoor workers are relatively similar to the region, and somewhat less than the state (see Table 2).

Language
Social factors like language proficiency can change the effectiveness of communication methods, which can be especially important for preparedness resources or during emergency response. For the purposes of this Climate Vulnerability Assessment, a person is considered to have limited-English proficiency if they are over age 5 and speak English less than “very well.” Overall, the City has a relatively small percentage of people citywide with Limited English Proficiency compared to both Orange County and the State (see Table 2). Lower rates of English proficiency are concentrated in a portion of southern Costa Mesa bounded approximately by Placentia Avenue on the west, 16th Street and Newport Boulevard on the south, Harbor Boulevard on the east, and Wilson Street on the north. In this area, approximately 30% of the population are considered limited-English proficiency. This area includes the previously identified disadvantaged census tract per CalEnviroScreen 4.0. These tracts have a relatively high rate of Spanish speakers.

-161-
291

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-10 Table 2. Socioeconomic Characteristics in Costa Mesa
Health Indicator
Rate of Socioeconomic Characteristics
Costa Mesa Orange County California
Households Below Poverty
Level1

5.8% 6.2% 8.5%
Unemployment1 2.8% 2.7% 3.5%
Outdoor Workers1 7.1% 6.7% 8.6%
Limited English-speaking
Households2

4.4% 8.3% 8.5%
Sources:
1 US Census Bureau. 2023. Selected Economic Characteristics. Table DP03. 2 US Census Bureau. 2023. Limited English Speaking Households. Table S1602.

Community Assets
Community assets refer to public places and key infrastructure throughout the City that fulfill daily needs or are a necessary resource during emergencies. This analysis considers emergency response facilities, public gathering places, and utilities. Understanding these community assets can help to determine how facilities impact adaptive capacity throughout the community, and identify where facilities may be leveraged to provide additional functions.
• Adaptive Capacity
- A community’s ability to withstand, adapt to, and recover from climate-related hazards. City facilities and programs can enhance adaptive capacity by providing more resilient resources for the community.

Emergency Response Facilities
Emergency response facilities are used by first responders to address hazard events. These facilities include police, fire, and other emergency response services. There are six fire stations distributed throughout the City to allow for uniform response times. The City Police Department is located centrally, and there is a police substation on the westside. There are also two college police or safety departments located on Vanguard University and Orange Coast Community College campuses respectively. During major emergencies, the City activates its Emergency Operations Center (EOC), which is located at adjacent to CMPD headquarters between the police department building and city hall. These facilities play an essential operational role during hazard events, enabling a coordinated response and allowing first responders to reach community members in need. All City facilities described above have backup generators in case power is lost during an emergency. -162-
292

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-11 Hospitals are also essential emergency facilities. During hazard events, life-threatening impacts or injury may occur that require medical attention. College Hospital is located along Victoria Steet and SR-55/Newport Boulevard. There are also nearby hospitals outside the City that can provide emergency services and care to community members, such as Newport Bay Hospital (Newport Beach), Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (Newport Beach), South Coast Global Medical Center (Santa Ana), Memorial Care Orange Coast Medical Center (Fountain Valley), and Fountain Valley Regional Hospital and Medical Center (Fountain Valley).

All of the facilities discussed above, including those within the City and in adjacent cities, are located outside of hazard zones such as Fire Hazard Severity Zones, FEMA Flood Zones, and Tsunami Hazard Areas. This helps to ensure that these key facilities are able to continue operations during emergencies.

Gathering Places
Community gathering places (e.g., parks, libraries, etc.) can provide refuge for community members during hazard events. If residents already use these facilities for recreation, social events, education, or other activities in their day-to-day lives, it can make them more welcoming and effective as a cooling center, reception center, or shelter. These locations may also be used to share resources and information to prepare residents for climate-related hazards or assist them with recovery after climate-related hazards occur.

Parks Facilities
Parks provide places for community gathering, recreation, exercise, habitat for wildlife, and ecosystem services. Greenspace in urban or suburban areas can reduce the heat exposure and promote absorption of stormwater during heavy rain events. Vegetated areas, rain gardens, and bioswales can also absorb rainfall, decreasing stormwater flows.14 The City owns and operates a variety of park types with different sizes and purposes, such as:
• Neighborhood Parks – These are smaller parks serving daily needs of local residents. • Community Parks – These are larger parks offering open space and recreational opportunities like athletic fields or courts.
• Special Use Facilities – These are parks that serve a particular use, such as golf courses.

The Costa Mesa Country Club is an example of this type of facility.

14 EPA. 2024d. “Performance of Green Infrastructure.” https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/performance- green-infrastructure.
-163-
293

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-12 In total, the City owns, operates, and maintains 415 acres of park facilities. Facilities are generally spread throughout the City. Many residents have access to parks and can benefit from them, whether it be their cooling effect on neighborhoods, stormwater management, and ecosystem services. To this point, the City has focused residential development away from areas of the City that have the least access to parks. However, to meet state housing targets, the most recent housing element included a sites inventory that identifies some housing in northern Costa Mesa that would have more limited access to parks compared to much of the residential areas of the City.15
The largest contiguous area of parks includes Canyon Park, Fairview Park, Vista Park, Costa Mesa Country Club, and Talbert Regional Park (operated by OC Parks). This portion of western Costa Mesa covers over 500 acres of land.16 Much of this park space spans along the Santa Ana River, offering potential flood protection.

Non-City Parks Facilities
In addition to the City’s park facilities, there are recreation facilities and open spaces provided within or adjacent to the city but operated and maintained by another jurisdiction. Talbert Regional Park is a major example of this, and offers 244 acres of open space and recreation.

Further, the Santa Ana River trail provides recreation and active mobility along it. Orange County Parks and the US Army Corps of Engineers manage the trail. The OC Fair and Event Center, operated by the County, also offers a major hub for recreation, culture, and festivities during the OC Fair and as part of other events that occur there throughout the year.17 It’s 130 acres in total, with 157,000 square feet of event space, a 3-acre working farm, and over 7,500 parking spaces. These facilities and partner agencies have potential to be activated during hazard events. For example, in the past during major hazard events, Orange County has opened up the Equestrian Center at the fairgrounds to house evacuated large animals.

Water Features
Water features are an important aspect of parks as it relates to extreme heat. Water fountains offer drinking water and water features like pools or splash pads allow for cool recreation during extreme heat events. Most but not all parks have at least one drinking fountain. The Downtown Recreation Center/Lions Park is home to the Downtown Aquatic Center. The

15 City of Costa Mesa. 2023. “Housing Element Update.” https://www.costamesaca.gov/government/ departments-and-divisions/economic-and-development-services/planning/housing-element-update. 16 City of Costa Mesa. 2018. “Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan Update.” http://ftp.costamesaca.gov/costamesaca/council/agenda/2018/2018-02-13/SS-1-Attach-4.pdf. 17 Ibid.
-164-
294

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-13 aquatic center offers youth and adult programming, open lap swimming, and open recreation swimming.18 No splash pads exist in the City currently.

Community Centers and Libraries
Community centers are indoor facilities that provide a variety of social and recreational services and programming such as sports, cultural activities, performing arts, youth programs, older adult programs, and human services. The City has four community centers: Balearic Community Center, Downtown Recreation Center, Norma Hertzog Community Center (neighboring the Downtown Recreation Center), and Costa Mesa Senior Center.19 The City also has two libraries, the Donald Dungan Library and the Mesa Verde Library. Both are operated by the County.20
Cooling Centers
Cooling centers are publicly available facilities that residents can use to cool off. The City has several facilities that fall under this definition, including the community centers and city hall mentioned above. These spaces act as a place the community can come during normal operating hours to get out of extreme weather. During times of extreme heat which exceed pre-set thresholds, additional services or extended hours for facilities may be made available.

For example facilities such as the senior center have been opened on the weekends when they were otherwise closed, and bottled water has been provided at times as well. The City uses social media, 211OC, and the County’s website to promote cooling centers. Annually the City coordinates with the County to specify cooling center locations and update business hours.21

18 Ibid.
19 Ibid.
20 City of Costa Mesa. 2025. “Libraries.” https://www.costamesaca.gov/community/libraries. 21 Orange County. 2025. “Cooling Centers.” https://www.ocgov.com/cooling-centers. -165-
295

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-14 Utilities
Public utilities, such as electricity, water, and natural gas, support daily life and economic activities and provide residents and businesses with day-to-day essentials. Some climate- related hazards can disrupt utilities or cause increased costs for residents. This section describes electricity and water systems present in the City.

Electricity
Reliable Power
Reliable power is important to maintain regular daily activities and ensure safe conditions. The City’s electricity grid is part of a large network of overhead transmission lines in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Region operated by Southern California Edison (SCE). Three electrical substations within the City connect 33 kilovolt and 92 kilovolt powerlines east to west and north to south through the City.22 Still, the City is subject to outages as a result of large regional failures from climate-related events such as electricity shortages. Electricity shortages can occur at times of peak demand, such as during extreme heat events when air conditioning usage is highest.

Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS) are also a concern in California. However, PSPS are not anticipated to directly impact the City at this time, as there are no identified SCE circuits within the City that could undergo PSPS de-energization.
• Public Safety Power Shutoffs
- These are power-down events that can be exercised by utilities under high fire threat conditions (dry, warm, high wind events) to prevent potential ignitions.

Grid infrastructure, energy operator actions, and State oversight help to facilitate enhanced regional energy resilience. In addition, the City exercises actions to enhance local energy resilience. The LHMP outlines several energy policies and actions for the City including energy efficiency upgrades, backup power for critical facilities and traffic signals, and infrastructure planning in coordination with SCE.23

22 California Energy Commission. 2025. “California Electric Transmission Lines.” https://cecgis- caenergy.opendata.arcgis.com/search?categories=%252Fcategories%252Fenergy%2520infrastructure. 23 City of Costa Mesa. 2024. “Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.” Accessed July 1, 2025. https://www.costamesaca.gov/government/departments-and-divisions/the-office-of-emergency- management/local-hazard-mitigation-plan.
-166-
296

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-15 Costs
Excessive energy costs can discourage households from utilizing air conditioning. SCE offers several assistance programs for income-qualified households to offset energy costs. These include the California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE), which provides about a 30% discount on monthly electricity bills for very-low-income households; the Family Electric Rate Assistance (FERA) program, which provides an 18% discount for low-income households; SCE’s Energy Assistance Fund (EAF), which provides cash assistance to qualified households once per year; and the Energy Savings Assistance Program (ESAP), which provides qualified households free replacement appliances, weatherization, and LED lightbulbs to conserve energy and thereby lower electricity bills.24 Altogether, these programs can reduce the burden of energy costs.

Water
Water supply availability is expected to change in the coming years due to climatic factors discussed later in the Drought section. Water suppliers for the City include Mesa Water District and Irvine Ranch Water District. The City and its suppliers work with several agencies in the area to ensure adequate, reliable, and safe water supplies. • Water Supplies
- Water providers can use varying sources to supply their water. This can include using surface water from reservoirs, pumping groundwater, recycling water by treating previously used water to adequate levels (commonly for non-potable uses), or purchasing water from other providers.

MESA WATER DISTRICT
Approximately 90% of the City’s water supplies are provided by the Mesa Water District. All of Mesa Water District’s water supply is from local groundwater supplies in the service area. It’s also notable that Mesa Water District has instituted permanent water conservation practices and rules for its customers in the City.25 In an emergency, Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) provides imported potable water. And in the event of a potential water shortage, Mesa Water District has a Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) that provides water supply availability assessments, and specific steps to respond to drought or water

24 SCE. 2019. “Lower Your Electricity Bill, Increase Energy Efficiency.” Energized. Accessed July 16, 2025:
https://energized.edison.com/stories/lower-your-electric-bill-increase-energy-efficiency#:~:text=About%20one- third%20of%20SCE%E2%80%99s%20residential%20customers%20are%20enrolled,but%20may%20also%20lower%20 the%20amount%20customers%20pay.
25 Mesa Water. 2025. “Water Conservation Ordinance and Watering Rules” https://www.mesawater.org/save- water/conservation-requirements.
-167-
297

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-16 shortage conditions while maintaining reliable water supply. Mesa Water’s Drought Risk Assessment concluded that Mesa Water is projected to meet full-service demands through 2045, even for multiple-dry water year scenarios.26

IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
About 10% of water use in the City is provided by Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD). IRWD supplies water from a variety of sources, including imported water purchased from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MET) through Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC), groundwater from the Main Orange County Groundwater Basin and Irvine Subbasin, non-potable surface water from Irvine Lake, and recycled non-potable water from IRWD’s Michelson and Los Alisos Water Recycling Plants. In 2020, approximately 75% of drinking water was supplied by groundwater sources, while the remaining 25% was purchased or imported. IRWD’s 2020 non-potable water supply had a broader mix of sources, including approximately 67% from recycled water, 18% from surface water, 12% from groundwater, and 3% from purchased or imported water.27 Similar to Mesa Water District, Irvine Ranch Water District also has a WSCP to address and mitigate water shortage conditions from drought or other issues. IRWD’s Drought Risk Assessment projected the District to meet demands through 2040 even under 5-year droughts.28

26 Mesa Water. 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. https://www.mesawater.org/sites/default/ files/Save%20Water/Documents/Mesa%20Water%202020%20UWMP%20FINAL-2021.06.30.pdf. 27 Irvine Ranch Water District. 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. 28 Irvine Ranch Water District. 2021. 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan. https://www.irwd.com/ images/pdf/doing-business/environmental-documents/UWMP/2020_water_shortage_contingency_plan_ irwd_adopted_june2021.pdf.
-168-
298

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-17

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT
Due to Mesa Water District and IRWD’s reliance on groundwater, sustainable management of groundwater basins are important to ensure water pumping and recharge are balanced.

Recharge is how a basin regains water after it is pumped and used. The Orange County Water District (OCWD) manages recharge for the OC basin, and through a variety of projects OCWD has been able to maximize water recharge. Recharge for the basin occurs through multiple sources including natural recharge, recycled water, and imported water. • Natural recharge occurs when water infiltrates into the basin from precipitation, runoff from the hills and mountains, or groundwater underflows. • Recycled water is water that has been previously used, treated at a wastewater treatment plant, and injected back into the basin. OCWD currently provides recycled water in north Orange County through their Green Acres Project and Groundwater Replenishment System.
• Imported water is purchased from MWDOC and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MET), when available and needed. Untreated imported water can be used to recharge the OC basin through the surface water recharge system.

OCWD has developed a Resilience Plan, which will be relied upon and regularly updated to meet Sustainable Groundwater Management Act compliance, and ensure sustainable management of the groundwater basin.29

29 Orange County Water District. 2025. “OCWD Resilience Plan.” https://www.ocwd.com/wp- content/uploads/WIC.10.a.OCWD_Resilience_Plan-_Final_February-2024.pdf. -169-
299

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-18 Hazard Analysis and Impact Assessment
Each City faces their own unique set of climate-related hazards, which are changing differently based on local environmental factors. The following section summarizes information from Federal, State and local data sources to outline historic and future climate-related hazard impacts specific to the City.30
The following locally-applicable climate-related hazards were identified and assessed for the City:
• Drought
• Extreme Heat
• Flooding
• Wildfire
For each of these climate-related hazards, there are also unique considerations beyond the direct impacts that are evaluated. For example, several of the climate-related hazards have indirect air pollution impacts, wildfire is impacted by Santa Ana winds, and flooding hazards can be impacted by dam inundation and sea-level rise.

When applicable for each hazard, the following Hazard Criteria are discussed: magnitude, timing, spatial extent. Together these criteria indicate when, where, and how climate-related hazards might impact the City.
• Hazard Criteria
- Magnitude is the severity or total damage of an impact. - Timing describes how often an impact occurs, or when an impact occurs during the year.
- Spatial extent is the area that is impacted. For applicable climate-related hazards, mapping is used to show areas of more severe or more likely impacts.

Climate-related hazard models and their projections are regularly discussed in the magnitude and timing sections of this assessment to outline hazard trends. These models project hazard events through 2100, and this assessment commonly characterizes projections with mid- century (2035-2064) and end-century (2070-2099) impacts. It’s important to understand that climate-related hazard models are heavily impacted by future global GHG emissions and require assumptions to predict future hazard events. To make these assumptions climate

30 For more detail on regional climate impacts, refer to California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment Regional Report, which for Orange County is the Los Angeles Region Report. -170-
300

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-19 models use what are called emissions scenarios, which outline possible pathways for global GHG emissions. These emissions scenarios are discussed or shown on tables, often as it relates to hazard magnitudes.
• Emissions Scenarios
- The moderate emissions scenario (formally known as representative concentration pathway 4.5 or RCP 4.5) assumes global emissions peak around 2040 and then decline.
- The high emissions scenario (RCP 8.5) assumes global GHG emissions continue to rise through 2100.
- By 2050, the two scenarios result in minimal differences so only the high scenario is discussed, in-line with State recommendations. For 2100, both scenarios are discussed to provide a reasonable range of potential outcomes.

For each hazard, the “Impact on Costa Mesa” section describes key City assets most relevant to the specific hazard, and prevalent population groups in the City with heightened potential for impacts from the hazard. While any community member can be impacted by a hazard, some people may be more likely to experience heightened impacts due to physiological, social, economic, or environmental risk factors. For example, age could increase adverse effects from air pollution, a job that’s regularly outdoors might cause exposure to extreme heat, or having a fixed or low-income might make recovery from a flood more difficult. These intricacies will be discussed by hazard.

Following the sections on individual climate-related hazards, a section on compounding hazards discusses any outstanding issues where climate-related hazards act in tandem to worsen impacts or create new impacts. Issues like climate migration and debris flows are discussed as compounding hazards.

-171-
301

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-20 Drought
Droughts are periods of time where water supplies become scarce, often as a result of limited precipitation over a number of years. Droughts are relative to long-term averages for precipitation in a region. Local and up-to-date conditions can be viewed online via the U.S.

Drought Monitor.31
Magnitude and Timing
For drought, magnitude and timing are discussed concurrently because they are interconnected concepts due to magnitude being tied to length and frequency.

Droughts lasting several years to decades occur naturally in California.32 Global climate models project significantly drier soils in the future and an 80% chance of a multi-decadal drought during 2050–2099 under a high-emissions scenario. However, the frequency of wet and dry extreme events is also projected to increase between 25% and 100%, with limited changes in mean precipitation totals, indicating both intensified droughts and rainfall events.33 Spatial Extent
Droughts are regional events, though depending on the source of a community’s water supply, the region where drought is most impactful to a community may vary. For example, in Southern California water can at times be supplied from the State Water Project or Colorado River, which transport water long distances. In that case, droughts occurring elsewhere can impact local water supply. Given that the City’s water is provided primarily from local groundwater, droughts local to the southern California region are most impactful to the City’s water supply.

Impacts on Costa Mesa
Community Members
Cost is the main implication for community members related to increased drought frequency and intensity. Though poverty rates aren’t particularly high in the City, this is still an important impact. Both water providers for the City offer rebate programs to reduce upfront costs for

31 National Drought Mitigation Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Department of Agriculture. 2025. “U.S. Drought Monitor, California” https://www.drought.gov/states/california. 32 Ingram and Malamud-Roam. 2013. “The West without Water: What Past Floods, Droughts, and Other Climatic Clues Tell Us about Tomorrow.” Univ of California Press. 33 Swain et. al. 2018. “Increasing precipitation volatility in twenty-first-century California. Nature Climate Change 8:
427-433.
-172-
302

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-21 water efficiency projects, subsequently reducing long-term costs.34, 35 Home audits and other educational materials are also available to inform residents and businesses about water saving opportunities.

Infrastructure and City Programs
Drought impacts can vary by region, and understanding how they impact a specific City requires assessment of the utility provider’s sources of water supply. As discussed in the earlier Water section, local groundwater is the primary water source for the City’s water providers.

Drought conditions impact groundwater more slowly than surface water, though recharge of groundwater basins is often reduced during times of drought. With intensified drought paired with more intense rainfall events, adequate groundwater infiltration during storm events will require planning and infrastructure investments. OCWD’s Resilience Plan will guide regional efforts for sustainable management of the Orange County groundwater basin, and outlines priority projects that increase stormwater capture, manage sediment at recharge sites for more efficient recharge, and improve seawater intrusion barriers.36

34 Mesa Water. n.d. “Residential Rebates for Mesa Water Customers.” Accessed August 1, 2025. https://www.mesawater.org/Rebates.
35 Irvine Ranch Water District. n.d. “Rebates and Programs.” Accessed August 1, 2025. https://www.irwd.com/ save-water-money/rebates-programs.
36 Orange County Water District. 2025. “OCWD Resilience Plan.” https://www.ocwd.com/wp- content/uploads/WIC.10.a.OCWD_Resilience_Plan-_Final_February-2024.pdf. -173-
303

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-22 Extreme Heat
Abnormally high temperatures can cause adverse public health impacts in multiple ways, including through:
• Extreme Heat Days
- Extreme heat days occur when daily maximum temperatures are abnormally high.

For this CAAP we define it as days where the maximum temperatures exceed the 98th percentile in comparison to historical data. In Costa Mesa, this is when temperatures exceed 93° Fahrenheit.
• Heat Waves
- Heat waves are extended periods of sustained extreme heat. For this CAAP, heat waves are defined as periods of 4 consecutive extreme heat days. Each 4-day period is a separate event, so if extreme heat days persist for 10 straight days, it would be considered 2 heat waves.
• Warm Nights
- Warm nights are when nighttime temperatures (or the minimum temperature for a day) are abnormally high. Warm nights are often overlooked; however, night is an important time for the human body to cool off and recover from extreme heat experienced during the day. For the purposes of this CAAP, warm nights are defined as nights that exceed 80° Fahrenheit.

Magnitude
Historically (1961-1990), the City has experienced an average of 3 extreme heat days per year.

By mid-century (2035-2064), 11 extreme heat days are projected per year on average. By end- century (2070-2099), under a medium-emissions scenario, 11 extreme heat days per year remain projected, while under a high-emissions scenario that number jumps to 25 extreme heat days per year on average (see Table 3).37
Heat waves are also projected to occur more frequently. Historically (1961-1990), in an average year the City did not experience any heat waves. By mid-century (2035-2064), 1 heat wave is expected per year on average. Again, under a medium-emissions scenario for end- century (2070-2099), 1 heat wave remains projected. However, under a high-emissions scenario, 3 heat waves per year on average are projected by end-century (see Table 3).38

37 Cal-Adapt. 2025. “Extreme Heat Days and Warm Nights for Costa Mesa, Global Climate Models HadGEM2-ES, CNRM-CM5, CanESM2, MIROC5.” Cal-Adapt website developed by University of California at Berkeley’s Geospatial Innovation Facility under contract with the California Energy Commission. Accessed June 16, 2025. https://cal-adapt.org.
38 Ibid.
-174-
304

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-23 Historically (1961-1990), the City has not experienced warm nights in an average year. So while warm nights may have occurred at some point between 1961 and 1990, less than 15 warm nights occurred in total over that 30-year span. Warm nights are projected to remain uncommon in the City through mid-century and end-century under a medium-emission scenario. However, under a high-emission scenario, by end-century (2070-2099) the City is projected to experience 2 warm nights per year on average, limiting people’s ability to recover from extreme heat at night.39
Table 3. Extreme Heat Events

Historic
(1961 -
1990)
Mid-Century
(2035 -2064)
End-Century (2070 -2099)
Medium -Emission
Scenario
High -Emission
Scenario
Extreme Heat Days 3 days/year 11 days/year 11 days/year 25 days/year Heat Waves 0 events/year 1 event/year 1 event/year 3 events/year Warm Nights 0 days/year 0 days/year 0 days/year 2 days/year Source: Cal-Adapt. 2025. “Extreme Heat Days and Warm Nights for Costa Mesa, Global Climate Models HadGEM2- ES, CNRM -CM5, CanESM2, MIROC5.” Cal -Adapt website developed by University of California at Berkeley’s Geospatial Innovation Facility under contract with the California Energy Commission. Accessed Ju ne 16 , 2025. https://cal-adapt.org.

Timing
Extreme heat days most commonly occur in the City during the summer months, but they historically (1961-1990) have occurred as early as March or as late as November. By mid- century (2035-2064) the earliest extreme heat day has potential to occur in January, and the latest extreme heat day has potential to occur in December, meaning extreme heat is projected to become a year-round risk.40

39 Cal-Adapt. 2025. “Extreme Heat Days and Warm Nights for Costa Mesa, Global Climate Models HadGEM2-ES, CNRM-CM5, CanESM2, MIROC5.” Cal-Adapt website developed by University of California at Berkeley’s Geospatial Innovation Facility under contract with the California Energy Commission. Accessed June 16, 2025. https://cal-adapt.org.
40 State of California. 2018a. “Los Angeles Region Report” In California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment.

Accessed July 1, 2025. https://climateassessment.ca.gov/regions/. -175-
305

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-24 Spatial Extent
Extreme heat can be experienced differently from one street to another due to the urban heat island effect and other local factors. 41
• Urban Heat Island Effect
- Temperatures in urban areas with higher rates of dark and impervious surfaces, like roads, parking lots, and buildings, can be up to 7° F warmer than outlying areas during the day. This is due to these materials absorbing and re-emitting heat more than natural features like trees.

The areas that experience the most severe urban heat islands in the City are large parking lots and turf athletic fields, particularly those located farther inland (See Figure 2).

The urban forest can effectively reduce surface temperatures by providing shade to block the sun’s rays. In the City the rate of urban tree canopy cover is near the Statewide level at 11%.

The City’s urban forest has been growing, and from 2018 to 2022 the tree canopy grew approximately 45 acres citywide.42 Lower rates of tree canopy in Costa Mesa are seen near Newport Boulevard from the Fairgrounds and Vanguard College south to 16th Street.

Commercial and industrial uses are most common in this part of the City though residential is also interspersed.
• Urban Tree Canopy Cover
- This refers to areas directly covered by trees and roughly translates to the amount of available natural shade in the City at midday.

Proximity to the ocean is another major factor that limits the impact of extreme heat in the City. So while portions of Costa Mesa’s tree canopy are more limited, proximity to the ocean mitigates temperatures. The inland, northern and eastern parts of the City experience less ocean winds or marine layer fog.

41 EPA. 2025a. “Heat Island Effect.” Accessed June 16, 2025. https://www.epa.gov/heatislands. 42 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 2025. “California Urban Canopy Data.” Accessed July 1, 2025. https://www.fs.usda.gov/r05/state-tribal-forestry/california-urban-canopy-data. -176-
306

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-25 Figure 2. Urban Heat Island Severity in Costa Mesa

Source: Trust for Public Land. 2023. “Urban Heat Island Severity” https://www.arcgis.com/apps/ webappviewer/index.html?id=1b6cad6dd5854d2aa3d215a39a4d372d .

Note: This data was derived from Landsat 8 imagery band 10 (ground-level thermal sensor) from the summer of 2023. The purpose of this data is to show certain areas of Costa Mesa that are hotter than the average temperature as a whole. Areas that are without color are identified as below the mean temperature for the City.

-177-
307

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-26 Impacts on Costa Mesa
Community Members
Whereas a heat event can be relatively harmless for those with a reliable means for staying hydrated and cool, it can be deadly for others. Young children, the elderly, or people suffering from serious medical conditions are physiologically more vulnerable to heatstroke. Some senior citizens also take medication that can make it harder for their bodies to maintain a safe internal temperature, creating an additional threat from extreme heat events. Young children may be more vulnerable since they are not aware of the signs of dehydration or ways of protecting themselves from heatstroke.

Homeless people are at a high risk of health complications during heat waves, especially if they are unsheltered. According to the OC Homeless Management Information System data, in 2019, there were approximately 6,860 individuals experiencing homelessness in Orange County, with 57% unsheltered and 42% sheltered.43 These people are vulnerable to heatstroke during a heatwave, especially if they cannot reach a cooling center.

Sudden spikes in heat can catch people by surprise. Stores can rapidly sell out of fans, air conditioning units, or drinking water during a heatwave. Lower-income households or those with limited mobility may be unable to acquire enough insulation or cooling devices without significant preparations. This can be further compounded by the threat of Public Safety Power Shutoff events. During these events, extreme heat impacts may affect larger portions of the City, as well as populations that would not be viewed as vulnerable under normal circumstances.

Extreme heat can also impact public health through its effects on air quality; higher temperatures can accelerate and trap ground-level ozone, particulate matter, and other air pollutants. Increased exposure to these pollutants can lead to adverse short-term and long- term respiratory, cardiovascular, mental health, and reproductive outcomes.44 Air pollution in the City is not particularly high compared to much of Southern California, partially due to the proximity to the ocean. Still, there are freeways that pass through the City that will be considered further in CAAP policy.

43 OCHMIS.org. 2019. Orange County Point in Time Count 2019: Homelessness in Orange County. http://ochmis.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/2019-PIT-Infographic-7.30.2019.pdf. 44 California OEHHA. 2022. “Impacts on Human Health.” Indicators of Climate Change in California (2022). https://oehha.ca.gov/media/humanhealthsection2022.pdf.
-178-
308

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-27 Many residents withstand extreme heat events from home, emphasizing the importance of insulation and access to air conditioning. The City has historically experienced limited extreme heat impacts, though that is projected to change in the future. As such, homes may require retrofits to install air conditioning in the future. This is particularly important for inland homes whose temperatures are less moderated by the ocean. Further, if residents already have air conditioning, the costs to run A/C may discourage use. SCE provides a variety of assistance programs that can reduce energy cost burdens for income qualified households. They also offer rebate programs for energy efficiency improvements to reduce up-front costs and provide long-term energy savings, though renters may find it more difficult to utilize the rebate programs due to certain appliances being owned and provided by landlords.45 Infrastructure and City Programs
While SCE is responsible for much of the region’s energy infrastructure and resilience, the City can assist SCE with energy resilience by promoting energy efficient development through building code. The City can also continue to develop backup power infrastructure at key city facilities to promote local energy resilience.

45 Southern California Edison. n.d. “Income Qualified Programs.” Accessed August 1, 2025. https://www.sce.com/save-money/income-qualified-programs. -179-
309

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-28 Flooding
Flooding is a key climate hazard where water overwhelms drainage systems and inundates areas in the community, potentially creating public health risks or damaging infrastructure or buildings. The impacts of flooding can endanger human life; damage infrastructure, homes, and other structures; affect water quality through sanitary sewer overflows; and/or disrupt services due to road closures or infrastructure damage.

Flooding primarily occurs during extreme precipitation events when natural drainages and stormwater systems are overwhelmed. Extreme precipitation events in the City are defined as 2-day periods in which there is more than 0.67 inches of rainfall, which historically are 95th percentile events, or events that occur once every 20 years.

Flooding can also occur because of water infrastructure failures, for example a dam or levee failing. This is important to understand for the City due to its proximity to the Santa Ana River, which drains Southern California’s largest watershed. To mitigate flood hazard throughout the watershed, major flood control improvements have been implemented along the river course.

Coastal communities may also experience flooding from tidal events, or a combination of storms and tidal events. Although Costa Mesa is not a coastal community, due to its proximity to the coast there is a potential for cascading impacts from coastal flooding such as traffic flow from coastal evacuations, etc.

Magnitude
Extreme Precipitation Events
Historically, 1-in-20 year extreme precipitation events in Costa Mesa resulted in 3.41 inches of precipitation. The intensity of extreme precipitation events is projected to increase from historic levels by about 20% by mid-century (2034-3064) to 4.19 inches of precipitation. By end century, intensity is projected to increase from historic levels by about 50% under a high-emissions scenario to 5.1 inches of precipitation. However, under a medium-emissions scenario, extreme precipitation intensity is only projected to increase by about 4% from historic conditions, to 4.52 inches of precipitation.46

46 Cal-Adapt. 2025. “Extreme Precipitation Events for Costa Mesa, Global Climate Models HadGEM2-ES, CNRM- CM5, CanESM2, MIROC5.” Cal-Adapt website developed by University of California at Berkeley’s Geospatial Innovation Facility under contract with the California Energy Commission. Accessed June 16, 2025. https://cal- adapt.org.
-180-
310

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-29 That said, atmospheric rivers (regions of water vapor transported from warm water in the tropics) are expected to increase in frequency and intensity. Current global climate models project a nearly 40% increase in precipitation during atmospheric river events in Southern California by 2100 under a high-emissions scenario.47
Drought and extreme heat also influence flooding. As both become more frequent and intense (see Drought and Extreme Heat Sections), they can act in tandem to dry out the soil, reducing its ability to absorb moisture, increasing the risk of runoff and subsequent flooding during intense precipitation.

Dam Failure
Dam failure presents another risk factor for flooding. Major dam and levee infrastructure exists in Orange County to manage stormwater, and that infrastructure is especially applicable to the City due to the Santa Ana River making up the City’s western border. The three dams that present flooding potential to Costa Mesa are the Santiago Dam in the unincorporated community of Silverado, the Prado Dam in the City of Corona, and the Villa Park Dam in the City of Orange.

Approximately 33% of dam failures are due to overtopping, which is when water spills over the top of a dam. Overtopping can occur as a result or combination of design issues, maintenance issues, or natural hazards like extreme precipitation. As such, as extreme precipitation events become more intense, the risk of dam failure and subsequent flooding may also increase.

Should dam failure occur, the Santiago Dam could cause flooding for over 5,000 households in the City, the Prado Dam could cause flooding for over 3,000 households in the City, and the Villa Park Dam could cause flooding for over 200 households in the City.48 Figure 3, Dam Inundation, displays where flooding from dam failure is possible.

Sea-level Rise
Sea-level rise is a potential issue for coastal communities that can create flooding by increasing the elevation of tidal conditions. While Costa Mesa is not directly on the coast, parts

47 State of California. 2018b. “Statewide Summary Report,” In California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment.

Accessed June 16, 2025. https://climateassessment.ca.gov/state/index.html. 48 City of Costa Mesa. 2024. “Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.” Accessed July 1, 202.5 https://www.costamesaca.gov/
government/departments-and-divisions/the-office-of-emergency-management/local-hazard-mitigation-plan. -181-
311

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-30 of the City are within a mile of the ocean. Further, the Santa Ana river runs along the western border of the City and there are estuarine portions of the Randall Preserve (formerly known as Banning Ranch) adjacent to the City that present potential sea-level rise concerns.

Sea-level rise is different depending on where you are in California due to localized seismic processes, called vertical land motion. This assessment uses Los Angeles projections, which represent the nearest NOAA Tide Guage. It’s also important to understand that sea-level rise projections have a wider range of scientifically plausible outcomes than other climate-related hazards discussed in this assessment. By 2050 sea-level rise between 0.5 feet and 1.1 feet is plausible, with an intermediate scenario projecting 0.7 feet of sea-level rise compared to levels in the year 2000. By 2100, between 0.6 and 6.3 feet of sea-level rise is plausible, with an intermediate scenario projecting 2.8 feet of sea-level rise.

Open space in the City starts to become at risk of flooding when sea-level rise reaches 4.9 feet above year 2000 levels under normal tidal conditions, or 3.3 feet of sea-level rise in combination with a 100-year storm. It’s also important to note that this projection assumes current infrastructure remains the same into the future. As such, the City is not projected to experience impacts from sea-level rise through 2100 at this time.

Timing
The majority of precipitation events in California occur between November and March, though extreme precipitation is possible at any point during the year. Historically (1961-1990), the City has experienced 5 extreme precipitation events per year on average. Frequency of extreme precipitation is relatively stable and is only expected to increase to 6 events per year by end of century under a high-emissions scenario. Projections for mid-century (2035-2065) and end of century (2070-2099) under a medium-emissions scenario show no changes from historic frequencies of extreme precipitation events.

Spatial Extent
Extreme Precipitation
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps denote areas based on flooding risk, including assumptions about infrastructure like levees (see Figure 3, FEMA Flood Zones). The majority of the City is not within a flood zone. Areas that have a 1% chance of flooding are primarily contained within creeks, or roadways, or are open space. A large portion of northeastern Costa Mesa is within a zone denoting 0.2% chance of flooding, or likelihood of a -182-
312

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-31 flood once every 500-years. Additionally, much of northwestern Costa Mesa is within an area with reduced flood risk due to levees.

Dam Inundation
The City’s proximity to the Santa Ana River and major dams make the levee and dam infrastructure particularly important, as is discussed in the magnitude section of this hazard. The Prado Dam, Santiago Creek Dam, and Villa Park Dam each present risk of flooding in northern and western Costa Mesa should failure occur. Figure 4, Dam Inundation displays potential flooding from dam failure. To learn more information about these dams, refer to the City’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.49
Sea-level Rise
As indicated previously, sea-level rise is not projected to impact the City through 2100.

However, should faster than projected sea-level rise occur in combination with extreme precipitation, only open space within the City (including the Frank and Joan Randall Preserve and Talbert Park) are projected to be impacted, with no homes or infrastructure in the impact area, even under the worst plausible case-scenario of 6.6 feet of sea-level rise in combination with a 100-year storm.50
Impacts on Costa Mesa
Community Members
Extreme precipitation can damage structures or endanger community members by creating conditions for indoor mold to grow, resulting in increased rates of respiratory infection, including pneumonia.51 The areas at highest risk of flooding in the City primarily exist outside of residential areas, though 500-year storms could create more widespread flooding, potential for infrastructure failures, and damages.

Repairing damage from flooding differs depending on your homeownership status. The City’s significant renter population receives housing maintenance through landlords. Rental

49 City of Costa Mesa. 2024. “Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.” Accessed July 1, 2025. https://www.costamesaca.gov/government/departments-and-divisions/the-office-of-emergency- management/local-hazard-mitigation-plan.
50 Point Blue Conservation Science and U.S. Geological Survey. n.d. Our Coast Our Future.” Accessed August 1, 2025. https://ourcoastourfuture.org/.
51 Kontowicz, E., Brown, G., Torner, J., Carrel, M., Baker, K. K., & Petersen, C. A. 2022. Days of Flooding Associated with Increased Risk of Influenza. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 8777594. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8777594.
-183-
313

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-32 maintenance is regulated by the state, and health and safety issues must be addressed by landlords. Homeowners make their own repairs but may find it difficult if they are housing cost burdened, which is common in the City, though more prevalent with renters than homeowners.

Infrastructure and City Programs
The City’s existing local stormwater system, and regional dams and levees largely protect residents from flooding, though extreme precipitation events or nearby dam failures have potential to result in impacts to upwards of 5,000 households and a variety of City facilities.

The Army Corps of Engineers (Prado Dam), Irvine Ranch Water District (Santiago Creek Dam), and County of Orange (Villa Park Dam) are the applicable dam owners and operators.

Though not always publicly available, operators of dams with significant, high, or extremely high downstream hazard potential must submit an Emergency Action Plan to the California Office of Emergency Services and Department of Water Resources at least every 10 years.

These outline responses in the event of a dam failure, including preplanned actions to mitigate damage, notification and coordination procedures, and evacuation routes.52 Dam operators are also expected to coordinate with the City during testing to ensure readiness in the event of an emergency.

Related to local stormwater infrastructure, the City’s Storm Drain Master Plan is periodically updated alongside the LHMP and Capital Improvements Plan to address emerging issues or new data. Further, storm drains are maintained by the City ahead of and during the rainy season.53

52 Irvine Ranch Water District. n.d. “Dam Emergency Action Plans (EAP).” Accessed August 1, 2025. https://www.irwd.com/construction/dam-emergency-action-plans-eap. 53 City of Costa Mesa. 2024. “Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.” Accessed July 1, 2025. https://www.costamesaca.gov/government/departments-and-divisions/the-office-of-emergency- management/local-hazard-mitigation-plan.
-184-
314

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-33 Figure 3. FEMA Flood Hazard Zones

Source: FEMA. 2025. National Flood Hazard Layer. Accessed June 16, 2025. https://floodmaps.fema.gov/NFHL/status.shtml.

-185-
315

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-34 Figure 4. Dam Inundation

Source: California Department of Water Resources, 2020.

-186-
316

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-35 Wildfire
Wildfires are a type of fire that primarily ignite and burn through wildlands but can spread to developed areas. Often these are large fires that burn over 5 acres in size. Depending on local conditions like wind and topography they can spread quickly, potentially covering thousands of acres in a day.

Magnitude
Changes in wildfire projections are relatively uncertain, with studies finding between a 12% and 75% increase of burned area by 2050. Studies also find lower increases in burned area by 2100, as continued warming leads to overall fuel declines that limit wildfire intensity over the years.54
Santa Ana winds are an important factor that increase the risk of intense and large wildfires.

These are a unique climate feature in southern California referring to strong, hot and dry winds that originate inland from high-pressure air masses. These winds carry very dry air that can be catalysts for wildfire outbreaks, such as the 90 mph winds that fueled the 2025 Palisades and Eaton Fires, which burned over 37,000 acres and forced 150,000+ evacuations in Los Angeles County.55, 56 Orange County has also had major Santa Ana wind fires in recent history, including the Silverado Fire, which occurred in October 2020 during 80 mph winds, burned over 12,000 acres, and forced 70,000 evacuations.57 In fact, 25% of wildfires in the region occur during Santa Ana events.58 Projections of the intensity and frequency of Santa Ana wind events are also uncertain at this time. Some global climate models show an increase in future Santa Ana events, but other studies have found that Santa Ana events may decrease by approximately 20% in the future as the weather system that drives the winds weakens due to greater warming over interior land masses.59

54 State of California. 2018a. “Los Angeles Region Report.” In California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment.

Accessed July 1, 2025. https://climateassessment.ca.gov/regions/. 55 CAL FIRE. 2025. “Palisades Fire” Accessed June 16, 2025. https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2025/1/7/ palisades-fire.
56 CAL FIRE. 2025. “Eaton Fire” Accessed June 16, 2025: https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2025/1/7/eaton-fire. 57 CAL FIRE. 2022. “Silverado Fire” Accessed June 16, 2025. https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2020/10/26/silverado-fire/. 58 State of California. 2018a. “Los Angeles Region Report,” In California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment.

Accessed July 1, 2025. https://climateassessment.ca.gov/regions/. 59 Ibid.
-187-
317

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-36 Timing
Wildfires can occur at any time in the City, but are most likely to occur during the warm, dry season from April to October. Santa Ana winds blow primarily from October to April and can further increase wildfire risk by exacerbating the spread of fire.60 Spatial Extent
In the City wildfire risk is relatively limited and primarily isolated to the City’s overlap with wildlands along Talbert Park. In 2025, Western and Southwestern Costa Mesa were designated as a Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ), originating in Talbert Park and spreading outward. The City’s FHSZ’s are primarily open space but also overlap with parcels containing approximately 547 dwelling units, one school, and a religious institution. The City’s FHSZ’s can be seen on Figure 5. The Talbert Park South fire is the only recorded wildfire within city limits. It occurred in 2018 and burned to 7.5 acres before being contained.61
• Fire Hazard Severity Zones
- These zones are designated by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and adopted by local governments to signify elevated likelihood of fire hazard due to inherent characteristics of the land, like fuel loading, slope, and weather patterns. These zones do not account for mitigation measures such as vegetation management.
- Areas designated as high or very high fire hazard severity zones are subject to certain Building Code regulations related to ignition resistant building materials for new development, and very high zones are also subject to defensible space vegetation regulations.

Impacts on Costa Mesa
Community Members
Wildfires have potential to endanger community members, damage structures, trigger evacuations, and cause poor air quality. As stated above, over 500 dwelling units are located within the City’s FHSZ. These homes are most at-risk, but wildfire conditions are variable and can still impact homes outside of the defined hazard zones.

60 Cal Matters. 2024. Track California Wildfires. Accessed July 2, 2025. https://calmatters.org/california-wildfire- map-tracker/.
61 CAL FIRE. 2025. Historical Fire Perimeters. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://www.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/fire- resource-assessment-program/fire-perimeters.
-188-
318

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-37 Although much of is the City is outside of designated FHSZ, wildfire smoke from surrounding regions still poses a relevant public health hazard. Wildfire smoke can exacerbate asthma and increase the risk of heart attack. During California’s severe 2015 wildfire season, researchers found a 42% increase in risk of heart attacks 1 day after exposure to dense smoke among adults aged 65 and older.62
Infrastructure and City Programs
To mitigate fire, the City of Costa Mesa Fire Prevention Program includes a comprehensive set of City actions, such as:
• Development and enforcement of local fire, life safety, property, and environmental protection standards;
• Enforcement of State adopted fire & life safety codes; • Review of building construction plans;
• Inspections of building construction and businesses;
• Investigation of citizen complaints;
• Training of personnel in regard to fire and life safety codes; and • Public education efforts.

The LHMP outlines other City actions related to vegetation maintenance and landscaping intended to reduce fire hazard in parks, open spaces, and new developments in alignment with state and local recommendations. Following the State’s FHSZ designations in the City, Costa Mesa Fire & Rescue Department also developed a Citizen’s Guide to answer questions and gather feedback about what it means for residents.63

62 Wettstein, Z. S., Hoshiko, S., Fahimi, J., Harrison, R. J., Cascio, W. E., Rappold, A. G., & Mott, J. A. 2018. “Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Emergency Department Visits Associated with Wildfire Smoke Exposure in California in 2015.” Journal of the American Heart Association, 7(8), e007492. http://jaha.ahajournals.org/content/7/8/e007492.long. 63 City of Costa Mesa. 2025. “Wildland Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Costa Mesa.” https://apps.costamesaca.gov/ gismaps1/apps/storymaps/stories/552b995816f5483dad0825e1954eb874. -189-
319

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-38 Figure 5. Fire Hazard Severity Zones

Source: CAL FIRE. 2025. Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/fire-hazard- severity-zones.

-190-
320

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-39 Compounding Hazards
Compounding hazards occur when multiple climate-related hazards interact, leading to new or more intense impacts than a single hazard in isolation. While some of these impacts have been discussed above where they strongly relate to a specific individual hazard, this section summarizes additional compounding hazards that may be relevant to the City. Understanding these overlapping threats is essential to comprehensively outline potential climate risks in the City.

Debris Flows
Debris flows, also known as mudslides, are a particularly dangerous type of landslide that moves fast, carrying soil and debris and damaging objects in its path. Wildfire and drought can contribute to conditions that lead to debris flows by burning vegetation or causing vegetation to die off, leading to destabilized hillsides. When extreme precipitation follows these conditions, debris flows are more likely. Landslides have not occurred within the City, but there are deep seated landslide zones identified for the bluffs located in the southwestern portion of the City (See Figure 6, Deep Seated Landslide Zones and Fire Hazard Severity Zones).64 Approximately 4,149 households, or 10,658 residents, live in the City’s deep seated landslide zones.65 Some of the City’s landslide zones overlap with FHSZ’s, making the risk of debris flows possible as a result of extreme precipitation following a wildfire in the area.

64 City of Costa Mesa. 2024. “Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.” Accessed July 1, 202.5 https://www.costamesaca.gov/
government/departments-and-divisions/the-office-of-emergency-management/local-hazard-mitigation-plan. 65 Ibid.
-191-
321

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-40 Figure 6. Deep Seated Landslide Zones and Fire Hazard Severity Zones

Source: California Department of Conservation. 2019. Deep Seated Landslide. CAL FIRE. 2025. Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what -we-do/community- wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/fire-hazard-severity-zones.

-192-
322

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-41 Climate Migration
Climate migration is a phenomenon where people move to a new home as a result of major hazard events. Climate migration in the Southern California region is likely to occur as a result of damage from wildfires or flooding events, and may also occur as a way to avoid chronic issues like extreme heat or regular flooding as a result of sea-level rise. Multiple climate-related hazards may compound to intensify climate migration.

Studies of past climate migration have found the majority of migrants move nearby, often to more resilient nearby cities or neighboring counties.66 Local economic conditions like unemployment rate and wages of the new location factor into where people choose to move as well; locations with lower unemployment and higher wages are more likely to become permanent resettlements for climate migrants.67
Based on the City’s fairly limited hazard exposure and favorable economic characteristics, Costa Mesa may be an attractive destination for climate migrants. If and when this climate migration to the City occurs, the housing affordability challenges discussed in the Housing Section may be exacerbated in both the City and across the broader region.

66 Eyer, Dinterman, and Miller, Rose. 2018. "The Effect of Disasters on Migration Destinations: Evidence from Hurricane Katrina," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 91-106, April. 67 Wolsko, C. and Marino E. 2016. ”Disasters, Migrations, and the Unintended Consequences of Urbanization:

What’s the Harm in Getting Out of Harm’s Way?” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282891635. -193-
323

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-42 Recommendations
The following section outlines recommended climate adaptation strategies for the City, informed by the Climate Vulnerability Assessment and analysis of climate-related hazards above. These recommendations are intended to complement and build upon or add specificity to the City’s existing plans and programs, such as those outlined in the LHMP, and the ongoing work of various City departments. Recommendations are broken down by hazard below.

Multiple Climate-Related Hazards
Targeted Outreach and Resources
Community members experiencing homelessness are especially exposed to several climate- related hazards including extreme heat, poor air quality, and precipitation or flooding. The City, neighboring cities like Newport Beach, and homeless service providers should continue to engage community members experiencing homelessness to ensure they are aware of available City resources and partner programs, particularly those that are new or different during hazard events. The City should also work to receive input from people experiencing homelessness if certain resources like cooling centers are not being utilized. Common barriers to cooling center use for people experiencing homelessness, like lack of space for belongings or pets, may be able to be resolved at specific sites.

Renters are another major population in the City that face unique or heightened impacts from certain climate-related hazards. Much of the City’s renter population is also housing cost burdened, making things like use of air conditioning less accessible due to the tradeoffs of utility costs. While there are some utility-led rebate programs to reduce long-term costs via water and energy efficient appliances, program participation is often the responsibility of the landlord. To address these issues the City can directly share SCE resources with rental property owners and managers and can promote resources like FAQs about these programs which renters can use to discuss improvements with landlords.

Regional Collaboration
Regional collaboration is important to address a variety of climate-related hazards that impact not only Costa Mesa, but the broader region, such as dam inundation, water and energy infrastructure, and housing planning for climate migration. Some of the City’s risks are tied to infrastructure that is owned and operated by regional agencies or utilities, such as the -194-
324

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-43 electrical grid or levee infrastructure. At times this infrastructure is located within or directly adjacent to the City, though major components are also located throughout the region. As such, the City should regularly coordinate with these agencies to remain apprised of regional efforts and provide input when needed.

Collaboration with applicable regional agencies should include the following:
• For Dam Inundation:
- The Army Corps of Engineers
- Irvine Ranch Water District
- County of Orange
• For Climate Migration:
- Southern California Association of Governments
- Orange County Council of Governments
• For Water and Energy Infrastructure:
- Southern California Edison
- Mesa Water District
- Irvine Ranch Water District
- Orange County Water District
Extreme Heat
Shaded and Green Urban Spaces
Extreme heat is an emerging issue that doesn’t impact the City evenly. Areas most at-risk are those farther inland with more severe heat islands due to an increase in paved or dark surfaces and fewer trees.

Urban design can be used to reduce extreme heat and strategies should include both quick and affordable public interventions to address urgent needs, and long-term development standards to reduce heat as development occurs. Development code requirements or incentives can address key heat islands like parking lots via additional tree canopy or overhead solar. Where short-term improvements are needed, such as in public places like playgrounds or transit stops, options for immediate relief can include quick-build shade such as shade cloth, and temporary water stations, such as misting tents. These interventions are particularly valuable due to their flexibility, given that they can be deployed specifically during extreme heat events and are not bound to a fixed location. -195-
325

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-44 Landscaping can also address extreme heat through expanded tree canopy citywide or targeted tree shade in important areas. Urban Forest Master Plans or Corridor Master Plans can be developed to identify and manage priority areas. These types of plans can provide the most applicable landscape treatments by aligning landscaping with the existing built environment and balancing other needs such as maintenance, drought and fire concerns, and community desires.

Cooling Centers
While the City has had a relatively limited need for cooling centers in the past, the projected increase in extreme heat moving forward is expected to heighten community needs. To remain proactive, the City should consider developing a more formalized cooling center approach, or an adaptable suite of options that can be activated as necessary to respond to extreme heat.

Existing community center and senior center facilities, hours of operation, programming, staffing, and marketing through social media, 211, and the County provide a valuable baseline of support and awareness for community members. Several other facilities not run by the City, such as the County libraries, should also be consulted and considered as part of the network of support available to residents, though the City does not have control over operations or improvements.

To increase accessibility, the City can expand or adjust operations during an extreme heat event. Extending hours (i.e. opening facilities over the weekend) has been used in the past at the Senior Center and other Community Centers, and this could be valuable in the future on a case-by-case basis. The CAAP’s community survey found that over 30% of survey respondents would be encouraged to go to a cooling center if entertainment or activities were offered, or if there was a space where their pet was allowed to be. Therefore, adaptable facility policies or preplanned programming have potential to encourage resident attendance. Further, nearly 40% of survey respondents said they’d be encouraged if cooling centers were closer to where they live, which may be remedied by promoting where existing cooling centers are available, or may require creative solutions such as partnerships with local organizations or private businesses who might provide cooled, public spaces during extreme heat events.

Long-term resilience improvements should also be considered for key community gathering places. Backup power would help to ensure continuity of operations and access to air conditioning regardless of the potential for blackouts or brownouts during extreme heat events.
-196-
326

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-45 Community Preparedness
Extreme heat exposure outdoors is elevated in certain locations, like turf sports fields or construction sites. While the City does not operate these facilities or directly regulate these companies, staff can coordinate with state agencies and local operators and businesses to share educational resources and facilitate discussion about preventative measures, like access to water, awareness of the signs and symptoms of heat illness, procedural best practices like mandatory breaks and shade availability, and limiting activities during the hottest times of the day. Additionally, promoting “Know Your Rights” resources for outdoor workers can help employees to advocate for themselves if unsafe conditions occur.

Flooding
Low Impact Development
Among the climate-related hazards that could affect the City, flooding has the greatest potential to cause widespread and damaging impacts. Much of this is related to the proximity to the Santa Ana River and inland, manmade infrastructure. While the City has a robust stormwater system and enforces state flood mitigation requirements, additional efforts to encourage low-impact development (LID) have potential to reduce flooding hazards and stormwater costs. LID are design elements like bioswales, permeable pavement, or green roofs that mimic natural hydrologic processes, reduce or slow runoff by minimizing impervious surfaces.

There are various ways the City can encourage LID, including fee reductions, low-interest loans or rebates, or permit streamlining. Recognition programs are another option for businesses or homeowners that choose to incorporate LID practices into their properties. Further, some cities require LID practices for development or redevelopment beyond a certain square footage, as part of streetscape standards, or parking lot standards. The City also has landscape standards related to drought-tolerant landscaping that could potentially be integrated with LID practices.

Wildfire
Engagement and Education
The City already follows state law and guidance and has engaged with residents regarding the recently designated FHSZs, the required disclosures that come along with High FHSZs, and -197-
327

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-46 the voluntary and recommended actions the State notes. If State regulations regarding FHSZ property requirements change, further engagement will be necessary.

Beyond the City’s FHSZs, residents are still impacted by regional fires via smoke. The City can prepare materials ahead of fires that can then be shared when needed to outline the health risks associated with wildfire smoke and offer solutions that reduce exposure and protect public health. At times regional partners like South Coast Air Quality Management District will offer air purifiers, and when those become available for residents, they should be promoted by the City.

Debris Flows
Pre-Planning
Debris flows are possible after wildfires in the City due to the City’s overlapping wildfire and landslide hazard zones. The City should be proactive in preparation for this risk by conducting pre-planning and outlining best practices to reduce debris flow concerns. Coordination with state partners like the California Office of Emergency Services and California Geologic Survey will help to guide preplanning which may include tailored notification systems, evacuation procedures, or plans for debris flow hazard mapping post-fire.

-198-
328

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-47 Conclusion
This Climate Vulnerability Assessment establishes a clear foundation for Costa Mesa’s adaptation policy and actions by synthesizing local hazards, community vulnerabilities, and existing assets. The City faces increasing extreme heat, drought, flooding, and wildfire risks, with more intense heat, drought, and precipitation. Several hazards can also compound to create additional or broader impacts. The assessment highlights that while many Costa Mesa residents and facilities have limited hazard exposure today, projected climate changes will intensify exposures and have potential to amplify inequities throughout the community.

Key findings
Hazard Trends:
• Extreme heat days and heat waves are projected to rise substantially throughout the century, with inland portions of Costa Mesa experiencing the most severe exposure. • Extreme precipitation intensity is projected to increase over time, adding potential for flood exposure emanating from flood zones.
• Drought intensity is projected to increase.
• Wildfire and potential post-fire debris flows remain important localized threats in southwestern Costa Mesa.

Vulnerable Populations:

Renters, lower-income households, people experiencing homelessness, outdoor workers, and residents in identified disadvantaged census tracts face heightened risk due to heightened hazard exposure, housing characteristics, limited economic resources, or access barriers.

Community Assets:

The City benefits from well-distributed emergency facilities, parks, and libraries. Water and energy providers plan for long-term resilience for the local water and power supply and infrastructure and offer several programs to lower costs and advance utility resilience for individual community members.

-199-
329

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-48 Recommendations
The following recommendations were developed as a result of the Climate Vulnerability Assessment and will be refined further.
• Advance equitable resilience: Prioritize interventions in disadvantaged tracts and for renters and people experiencing homelessness through outreach, targeted services, and removal of barriers to program participation.
• Regional collaboration: Maintain active coordination with water districts, SCE, OCWD, US Army Corps of Engineers, and regional planning bodies to support and collectively address large-scale needs and migration pressures. Promote partner agency or utility resilience programs to residents to ensure incentives, rebates, or other benefits are received by community members.
• Reduce urban heat: Expand tree canopy and deploy quick-build shade and water features in key community locations and corridors; further integrate shade into development and urban design.
• Preplan for cooling centers: Plan and adjust procedures and infrastructure for cooling centers over time to ensure effectiveness. Consider backup power, amenities to incentivize use, and access and functional improvements to continue to serve diverse needs for a variety of events.
• Strengthen flood resilience: Incentivize low-impact development, bioswales, and permeable surfaces.
• Prepare for compounding events and migration: Incorporate debris-flow planning, post-fire mapping, and regional housing coordination to address potential climate migration and cascading impacts.

To ensure the most effective and impactful adaptation strategy, city actions will need to center equity, incorporate a flexible and phased approach, and establish accountability through clear implementation and monitoring. This assessment provides the background needed to develop the CAAP’s adaptation chapter and to guide City decisions that reduce risk, protect public health, and strengthen community resilience.

-200-
330

APPENDIX B CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 B-49

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-201-
331

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-1

APPENDIX C
Outreach and
Engagement
Materials
-202-
332

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-1

Community Outreach and Engagement

1. Overview
To enable participation from a diverse range of community members and interested parties in Costa Mesa, the City took a balanced, multipronged approach to outreach and engagement for the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP). Opportunities for engagement included:
• A community open house focusing on CAAP sectors and objectives • Pop-up outreach activities at well-attended public events • A community survey to solicit more in-depth feedback
• Internal working group meetings with relevant City departments to facilitate collaboration in the CAAP development process
• An external focus group with key interested parties
• Presentation and workshop with the Coastal Regional Occupation Program Sustainability Cohort
• Site visits to the Mesa Water District Education Center and Orange County Water District • Public hearing to update the City Council on CAAP progress and outreach • Digital engagement via social media, the City Hall Snapshot newsletter, and email blasts to the interested parties list
• Flyers posted at City Hall, other City facilities, and coffee shops Outreach and engagement touchpoints were scheduled to occur throughout key points in the planning process, ensuring lived experiences and local priorities informed each stage of the development of the CAAP, from background analysis to policy development and implementation. Through in-person and online engagement activities, the City heard from more than 340 community members, whose feedback and input were invaluable for shaping each component of the plan.

Descriptions of the various outreach activities, along with their key takeaways, are presented below.

The following attachments are included that provide additional details such as feedback, takeaways, and photos:
• C-1 Community Pop-Up Event #1, Earth Day
• C-2 Community Pop-Up Event #2, Concert in the Park
-203-
333

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-2

• C-3 Community Surveys
• C-4 Community Open House

2. Community Pop-Ups
Several outreach pop-up/tabling events were conducted between spring 2025 and spring 2026 to build awareness of the CAAP and engage Costa Mesa community members to identify their priorities for a more sustainable future.

The first CAAP pop-up was held at the City of Costa Mesa Earth Day Festival on the City Hall lawn on Saturday, April 26, 2025, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. During this event, attendees interacted with City staff, reviewed educational materials, contributed to an interactive community collage, and learned about the community survey. Over 65 community members provided direct input and more than 150 visited the pop-up.

A second Earth Day pop-up event was held at the same location on Saturday, April 18, 2026, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. This event focused on educating attendees about the CAAP’s goals, benefits, and progress. The event additionally promoted the upcoming community open house scheduled for April 30, 2026. Over 200 community members participated.

A community pop-up outreach event was conducted at a Costa Mesa Concert in the Park at Fairview Park on Tuesday, July 29, 2025, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. More than 40 participants engaged with staff, helping to broaden awareness of the City’s climate planning efforts and survey. Residents of all ages, representatives of local organizations, and members of the local business community learned about the CAAP while attending the Earth Day Festivals and Concert in the Park.

-204-
334

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-3

Outreach Materials
The City utilized educational poster boards at each pop-up event to highlight the purpose and intent of the CAAP, its benefits to the community, emission sectors, the difference between climate mitigation and climate adaptation, the greenhouse gas effect, among other topics. A large, interactive poster board was designed to create a tree-shaped -205-
335

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-4

community collage: participants contributed leaf-shaped comment cards with their vision for a more sustainable city, forming a visual tree canopy representing the community’s vision.

Key takeaways:

Community feedback indicated strong support for expanding renewable energy, enhancing green space and urban landscaping, and improving sustainable transportation options as alternatives to car travel. Participants also emphasized the importance of waste reduction, water conservation, and equitable community resilience, particularly for vulnerable populations.

TRANSPORTATION
• Strong interest in improving bike infrastructure and safety (e.g., protected bike lanes) • Support for enhancing public transportation options
• Emphasis on accessible, non-car transportation alternatives such as biking and walking -206-
336

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-5

ENERGY AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
• Strong interest in expanding solar energy use
• Support for increasing electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure • Desire to explore additional renewable sources (e.g., wind) • Need to make solar more accessible and affordable

NATURAL AND URBAN LANDS
• Strong interest in planting more trees and using native landscaping • Desire to expand parks and community gardens

SOLID WASTE
• Strong support for increasing composting and recycling • Desire to reduce litter citywide
• Need for more accessible information on electronic waste disposal

WATER AND WASTEWATER
• Interest in expanding stormwater capture
• Emphasis on water conservation efforts

PEOPLE AND COMMUNITY
• Interest in developing resiliency centers for extreme heat events • Emphasis on supporting vulnerable populations, including older adults

3. Community Surveys
A total of 228 community survey responses were received, of which 158 were fully completed.

The community survey was provided through two online survey formats (long-form and short- form) designed to understand current behaviors, barriers to adopting more sustainable practices, and priorities for climate-friendly actions. The long-form survey was available from April 22, 2025, to October 3, 2025, while the condensed survey was available from July 29, 2025, to October 3, 2025. There were 31 responses received on the short-form survey during the first Earth Day Festival event, and 62 additional responses were received thereafter; 65 responses were received on the long-form survey.

The survey included questions across key topic areas such as transportation (walking, biking, transit use, and EV ownership), energy (energy efficiency upgrades and opting into alternative -207-
337

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-6

energy providers), water (drought-tolerant landscaping and graywater/ rainwater capture), solid waste (composting), and extreme heat (cooling center use).

Respondents represented a range of connections to Costa Mesa, with 48% identifying as residents who own their homes, 24% as renters, and the remaining participants owning property or businesses in the City (16%) or having another form of affiliation (12%).

Key takeaways:

TRANSPORTATION
• The primary barrier to walking was the distance to everyday destinations • A lack of bike lanes and safety concerns due to fast/busy car traffic were both cited as primary challenges for biking
• Barriers to utilizing public transit were predominantly inconvenient routes/stops for reaching desired destinations and long wait times for buses due to low frequency • One-third of survey respondents reported that their household used an EV • The primary barrier to EV ownership was cost, followed by a preference for non-EVs • Limited access to home charging was cited as a significant infrastructure-related concern
• Range anxiety remains a key hesitation, reflecting concerns about battery range and charging availability

ENERGY AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
• The primary barrier to making energy upgrades and to switching from gas to electric appliances was cost
• A preference for gas appliances, such as stoves, further limits adoption of electric alternatives
• Interest in alternative energy suppliers is mixed, with about 30% of respondents willing to opt into a basic (50% renewable) package
-208-
338

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-7

- Approximately 20–30% of respondents would opt into a premium (100% renewable) package
- A similar share (20–30%) of respondents indicated they would not opt into an alternative energy supplier

SOLID WASTE
• More than 55% of respondents currently participate in composting • The primary barriers to composting include concerns about vermin and odor • A lack of supplies, such as access to compost bins, is another key obstacle

WATER AND WASTEWATER
• Taking shorter showers is the most common water-saving strategy, followed by using low-flow fixtures and drought-tolerant landscaping
• Cost and time are primary barriers to adopting drought-tolerant landscaping • Renters face additional challenges, as tenant status often limits control over landscaping decisions
• A lack of knowledge is the biggest barrier to installing graywater or captured rainwater systems, highlighting the need for education.

EXTREME HEAT
• Proximity, availability of entertainment or activities, and pet-friendly policies are the most important factors for encouraging the use of cooling centers • Approximately 30% of respondents indicated a preference for using a business rather than a community center for cooling purposes

4. External Focus Group
The external focus group meeting, held on December 9, 2025, was designed to gather targeted input from businesses and key interested parties to help shape the CAAP. Participants included representatives from the building industry and real estate industry, local nonprofit organizations, an institution of higher education, and a regional electricity utility.

The meeting introduced the CAAP’s purpose, scope, and timeline, then invited participants to enter breakout rooms assigned to each participant’s sector: land use development, local organizations and advocacy, and utility partners. In these breakout rooms, participants shared their current successes and challenges related to implementing practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and/or improve resilience to climate impacts, and they also discussed opportunities for collaboration with the City to realize the goals of the CAAP. -209-
339

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-8

Feedback focused on identifying existing programs, barriers to implementation, and potential incentives that could better support local action.

Key takeaways:

• Strong interest in partnerships and collaboration with the City to implement CAAP actions
• Identification of cost and funding as major barriers, and the importance of implementation feasibility, including cost, scalability, and real-world usability of proposed actions
• Need for enhanced community engagement, education, and outreach • Shared emphasis on equity, access, and inclusive implementation of climate strategies LOCAL ADVOCACY GROUP: COASTAL CORRIDOR ALLIANCE
• Emphasis on nature-based solutions, including tree preservation, park restoration, and climate resilience strategies
• Advocacy for urban heat island mitigation (e.g., cool streets, rooftop gardens, pop-up cooling strategies)
• Interest in carbon sequestration opportunities through landscaping, parks, and partnerships
• Concern about equity impacts, particularly displacement related to CAAP implementation
• Support for community-oriented spaces and programming to reduce car dependence • Emphasis on sustained, structural changes (e.g., work schedule shifts, telecommuting) • Funding-dependent outreach, noting nonprofits can expand outreach significantly if funding is provided
• Empasis on multi-benefit framing, implicitly supporting climate actions that also improve social outcomes
-210-
340

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-9

LOCAL ADVOCACY GROUP: COSTA MESA ALLIANCE FOR BETTER STREETS • Strong focus on safe, connected, and comfortable active transportation networks • Identification of infrastructure gaps, including dangerous intersections and incomplete bike networks
• Advocacy for incremental, high-impact improvements
• Focus on unlocking existing assets, including improving access to parks and school facilities rather than only building new infrastructure • Promotion of bike and pedestrian education programs, especially for youth • Emphasis on shade trees and greenery in the public right-of-way to improve walkability • Interest in partnerships with the City and schools, including grant collaboration and outreach
• Raised the need for better institutional coordination, especially between the City and schools
UTILITIES/ENERGY PROVIDERS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SOCAL GAS • Highlighted availability of technical resources, incentives, and infrastructure support (e.g., EV charging, reach codes)
• Focus on energy demand, load capacity, and infrastructure planning • Emphasis on cost, reliability, and affordability as key factors for customers • Support for customer choice and transparency, including awareness of backup energy sources
• Interest in ongoing coordination with the City, including regular check-ins and collaboration
• Willingness to support implementation with funding, programs, and technical expertise PRIVATE SECTOR/DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTATIVES: BUILDING INDUSTRY

ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
• Emphasized that CAAP implementation must balance climate goals with housing delivery, economic feasibility, and infrastructure readiness • Utility capacity constraints and long interconnection delays (12–18 months) are a major barrier, particularly for EV infrastructure, and are exacerbated by increasing demand and densification
• The Building Industry Association of Southern California emphasized the need for better coordination between cities and utilities, especially to align growth (e.g., RHNA, upzoning) with infrastructure planning
• Strong preference for flexible, performance-based standards rather than prescriptive requirements, allowing developers to meet targets in cost-effective ways • Concerns that stringent requirements could disproportionately impact smaller builders and slow housing production
-211-
341

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-10

• Space and market constraints limit feasibility of certain measures (e.g., bike facilities, reduced parking), particularly in multifamily developments

5. Community Open House
On Thursday, April 30, 2026, approximately 30 community members attended a joint CAAP and Environmental Justice open house held from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. at City Hall.

The event began with a presentation from City staff and consultants, providing an overview of both efforts and how participants could share feedback. The open house featured a combination of discussions, educational materials, and interactive engagement stations.

Participants were invited to engage directly with the materials by using dot stickers to indicate priorities and Post-it notes or comment cards to provide more detailed feedback. This format encouraged both quick input and more substantive comments, allowing attendees to share their perspectives on proposed strategies and help inform development of the CAAP. The City received a total of 37 Post-it note comments and 80 prioritization stickers.

-212-
342

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-11

-213-
343

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-12

Outreach Materials
Several poster boards provided educational information on the CAAP, including key concepts such as climate mitigation and adaptation, local climate hazards, and greenhouse gas emissions, as well as the plan’s goals and co-benefits, such as improved air quality and cost savings. Strategy boards presented draft objectives and sample actions across the eight sectors of the CAAP.

Key takeaways:
• Participants provided the most feedback on Transportation, Natural/Urban Lands, and Energy and the Built Environment sectors, indicating these are priority topic areas:
-214-
344

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-13

• Water-related strategies, including recycled water irrigation systems, were identified as important by participants
• Other key priorities included:
- Waste reduction efforts, particularly recycling solid waste - Resilient urban design to prepare for climate impacts - Sustainable business practices and green workforce development to support local economic and environmental goals
- Expanding green spaces and increasing tree canopy
- Restoring and enhancing soil

TRANSPORTATION
• Participants strongly supported expanding walking and biking, with a focus on improving safety and comfort
• Safer and more connected bike infrastructure emerged as a key priority, including closing gaps between neighborhoods and key destinations - Improved east–west connectivity was specifically identified as an important need within the bike network
• Participants highlighted interest in making temporary programs permanent fixtures in the community, such as the Let’s Go Costa Mesa program
• Support for smart growth strategies, such as mixed-use development, was noted as a way to reduce reliance on driving
0 5 10 15 20 25
Offroad
Solid Waste
People & Community
Water/Wastewater
Natural/Urban Lands
Energy and the Built…
Municipal
Transportation
Dot Stickers Comments
-215-
345

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-14

ENERGY AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
• Participants expressed strong support for expanding solar panel use, including accelerating programs that incentivize solar installation in new construction • Participants emphasized the importance of incentive-based approaches to encourage solar development rather than mandates
• Some participants cautioned against certain building strategies, noting that cool roofs may present challenges due to insurance company requirements

NATURAL/URBAN LANDS
• Expanding green spaces and increasing tree canopy were identified as top priorities for improving environmental quality and cooling
• Participants emphasized the importance of soil restoration and enhancement as a key ecological strategy
• Several community members advocated for urban greening efforts with co-benefits, including planting fruit trees to improve food access and community sustainability • Participants highlighted the need for stronger conservation efforts to protect and expand natural habitats and biodiversity
• Increased awareness and promotion of existing City programs, such as parkway tree planting, were identified as opportunities
• Participants also called for education and resources to support native and wildlife- friendly landscaping practices

SOLID WASTE
• Expanding and supporting recycling efforts emerged as a key area of interest • A community-suggested strategy included launching a free woodchip program tied to tree removal to help reduce outdoor water demand

WATER AND WASTEWATER
• Support for water reuse strategies emerged as a key priority among participants • Low-tech, accessible home water conservation methods—such as capturing and reusing water at home—were viewed favorably
• Participants expressed interest in incentives for permeable landscaping and construction to improve water management
• Providing resources such as free or subsidized cisterns was identified as a way to encourage water conservation
-216-
346

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-15

OFF-ROAD EQUIPMENT
• Several community members marked electrification of landscaping and construction equipment as a priority

PEOPLE AND COMMUNITY
• Participants identified resilient urban design strategies, such as tree canopy and stormwater capture, as key priorities for supporting community climate resilience • Support for sustainable business practices and green workforce development reflects interest in aligning economic development with climate goals • Expanding existing City programs, such as the Green Business Program, were highlighted as opportunities to encourage broader participation • Cooling strategies, including improved cooling center amenities and access, were identified as important for community health and safety • One community member suggested targeting heat-vulnerable locations, such as school sites, for future cooling and resilience investments

MUNICIPAL
• Participants supported transitioning to zero-emission landscaping equipment for City operations
• Expanding public EV infrastructure was identified as a key municipal priority • One participant suggested exploring electrification of emergency vehicles, where feasible
• Energy-efficient upgrades to public infrastructure, such as motion-activated street lighting, were highlighted as opportunities
• Participants expressed interest in enhancing park amenities with sustainable features, including water stations and solar shade structures

6. Additional Targeted Outreach
The City conducted targeted outreach to facilitate discussion and input on the CAAP. The following sections summarize outreach efforts to the Coastline Regional Occupational Program Sustainability Cohort and Mesa Water District.

Coastline Regional Occupational Program
The City conducted targeted outreach to the Coastline Regional Occupational Program Sustainability Cohort to engage younger residents and students in the CAAP process. City staff delivered a presentation introducing the CAAP and its goals and also facilitated an interactive activity in which participants shared their input, via leaf-shaped comment cards tied to the -217-
347

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-16

community collage begun at the community open house, on what the CAAP’s analysis and actions should address. The session included 10 participants, consisting of both high school students and young adults, who were highly engaged and interested in sustainability topics. Key themes from their feedback included the importance of improving public transportation, enhancing walkability, and expanding green space.

Mesa Water District
The City conducted a site visit and tour of Mesa Water District Educational Facility to better understand the agency’s ongoing sustainability initiatives and coordinate efforts for the CAAP.

Orange County Water District
City staff toured the Orange County Water
District’s Groundwater Replenishment System
(GWRS) facility on Marh 25th, 2026. The GWRS
is a joint project of Orange County Water
District (OCWD) and the Orange County
Sanitation District (OC San). The facility
provides enough new water for up to one
million residents, making it the largest
advanced water purification system for
potable reuse in the world.

During the facility tour, City staff learned
about the role of the GWRS facility in
replenishing groundwater resources, received detailed information about the treatment process, and were guided through the facility to observe operations and water quality monitoring. This site Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS)
-218-
348

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-17

visit informed the City about current regional efforts to conserve water supply and reduce reliance on imported water.

Estancia High School Community E-Bike Skills Workshop
On August 7, 2025, City staff hosted a pop-up at the
Estancia High School Community E-Bike Skills Workshop to engage students and their families on climate action and sustainable transportation. The event provided an
opportunity to share information about the CAAP’s goals, key focus areas, and anticipated strategies.

During the workshop, participants learned about the
benefits of e-bikes as a clean transportation alternative, while City staff facilitated informal discussions to gather input on community priorities, barriers to adopting active transportation, and ideas for improving bike infrastructure and safety. Attendees were encouraged to take the
community survey.

Building Industry Association of Southern California
Following the external focus group meeting, the City held a follow-up discussion with the Building Industry Association of Southern California on January 14, 2025. The purpose of the meeting was to gain a better understanding of the building industry's experience with current development practices and the feasibility of common greenhouse gas reduction and adaptation measures, including implementation challenges, technological considerations, and other barriers, as well as areas where they have been able to advance sustainable goals and practices. Discussion topics included EV charging infrastructure, energy performance standards, renewable energy generation and storage, zero-emission off-road equipment, end- of-trip bicycle facilities, indoor and outdoor water conservation strategies, and nature-based climate solutions. The meeting provided an opportunity for open dialogue, allowing Building Industry Association representatives to ask questions, share perspectives, and provide feedback on their experience with industry-standard climate action and adaptation strategies, as well as finding ways to collaborate on sustainable efforts now and in the future.

E-Bike Skills Workshop Poster
-219-
349

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-18

7. Digital Engagement
To build awareness of and encourage
meaningful participation in the CAAP,
the City developed a dedicated project
webpage to serves as a central hub for
information and engagement
opportunities. The webpage includes
detailed content such as the project
timeline, key milestones, and clear
explanations of how community
members can get involved at each
stage of the process. It also features
frequently asked questions to address
common inquiries, along with summaries
of engagement activities and input gathered to date, helping to keep the public informed.

To ensure broad and inclusive outreach, the City created and distributed materials in both English and Spanish. These materials were shared through multiple communication channels and formats, including content on the City’s official website, City Hall Snapshot articles, email blasts, and posts and reels on the City‘s social media platforms. Flyers were also posted around City Hall, other City facilities, and at local coffee shops. This coordinated outreach effort was intended to increase visibility of the CAAP process, provide information, and encourage community members to participate.

Screenshot of City’s CAAP webpage
-220-
350

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-19

Social media outreach included Instagram
stories and reels (approximately 7,000 views),
a Let’s Talk Costa Mesa interview feature on
the City’s YouTube channel and social media
(approximately 2,200 views), and reminder
stories to boost engagement leading up to
major events, such as Earth Day, the close of
the community survey, and the community
open house. Cumulatively, social media
content reached more than 9,000 people.

Let’s Talk! Costa Mesa Feature
-221-
351

APPENDIX C OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-20

City Hall Snapshot
Event Flyers
-222-
352

City of Costa Mesa | Climate Action & Adaptation Plan | 2026 C-1

APPENDIX C -1
C-1 COMMUNITY
POP-UP EVENT #1,

EARTH DAY
-223-
353

COSTA MESA CAAP
Earth Day Event and Community Survey Feedback Overview and Takeaways AK CUMan
WhAT ARF GHG EMISSIONS AND
THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT!
fQx aa' lot fna<j»»« 4«GB y ! EWan

COSTA MESA CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTAIION PLAN
Ef Pion d« Accidn y Adop»oci6n ChmafiCO d* Coito Meta
MniGATWN
ision a More Climate Friendly and Resilient Costa Mesa! hinemos uno Costa Meso Mds Pesitenta /Pespetaoso con el C^mqi -224-
354
Community Event:
• At the community event, over 65 participants shared a vision for a more sustainable Costa Mesa that emphasized the following:
o Increased renewable energy sources
o Additional trees and access to accessible green space o Improved transportation options as alternatives to car travel, such biking, walking, and public transit.

Community Feedback Survey:
• Through the feedback survey, 31 community members expressed an interest in:
o More sustainable transportation options (biking, walking, public transit, EVs) o Energy efficiency upgrades
o Composting and Recycling Efforts
o Water Conservation
• Participants cited a number obstacles that they face when implementing these options (lack of infrastructure, safety concerns, need for economic incentives)
Event and Survey Feedback Overview
-225-
355
The Event was held on Saturday, April 26th from 10:00 am – 2:00 pm at the City Hall Lawn. Over 65 community members visited the booth and shared their feedback about the Costa Mesa CAAP.

Event Goals:
• Raise awareness for the City’s climate planning efforts and share opportunities to participate in CAAP development. • Educate the community on common terms and topics that will be discussed during the planning process, such as greenhouse gas emissions, emission sources, CAAP, adaptation, etc. • Identify the current barriers faced by the community for individual behavioral changes to reduce community-based emissions.
• Accessible and interactive outreach that meets the
community “where they are," and build consensus relative to a sustainable vision for Costa Mesa.

Community Pop-Up #1: Earth Day Event
-226-
356
Community Pop-Up #1: Earth Day Event
-227-
357
Community Pop-Up #1: Earth Day Event
-228-
358
Community Pop-Up #1: Earth Day Event
-229-
359
The event featured education-focused boards with the following objectives:
• Introducing the community to common terms and topics that will be used during the planning process • Sharing the goals and benefits of the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan • Informing participants about additional opportunities to provide feedback Outreach materials were provided in both English and Spanish.

Education Focused Materials

COSTA MESA CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN
El Plan de Accion y Adaptacion Climatica de Costa Mesa
The City of Costa Mesa is developing its first-ever Climate Action and Adaptation Pion (CAAP) to meet greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction goals while also adapting to the impacts of climate change.

La Ciudad de Costa Meta esta detarrollando su primer Plan de Accion y Adaptacion Climatica (el Plan CAAP) para cumplir con lot objetivot de reduction de emitionet de gates de efecto invernadero (GEI) y al mismo tiempo adaptarte a lot impactos del cambio climatico.

ACTION VS ADAPTATION - ‘Wtvab’bthe di^ge/besvce?
Accion vs Adaptacion - gCual es la Diferencia?

WHAT ARE GHG EMISSIONS AND
THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT?
^Oue son las Emisiones de GEI y el Efecto
Invernadero?
GHGs trap heat in the earth's atmosphere and
create a warming effect. GHGs are emitted into
the atmosphere from natural processes and human
activities.

Lat emisionet GEI trapan el color en la atmosfera terrestre y crean un efecto de calenfamiento. Lat emisionet GEI
se emiten a la atmotfera a partir de procetos naturalet y actividadet humanas.

GHG EMISSION SOURCES AND CLIMATE HAZARDS

GHG EMISSION SOURCES
On-Road Transportation Emissions are from vehicle travel, including vehicles such as cars, trucks, and buses using gasoline, diesel, or are electrically powered.

Building Energy Emissions are from burning fossil fuels to provide power to buildings for heating, cooling, lighting, and cooking.

Off-Road Emissions are generated by construction, industrial, and other off-road equipment as well as gas or diesel-powered landscaping equipment such as lawn mowers or leaf blowers.

Water and Wastewater Emissions are from energy used to pump, treat, and distribute water to residents and businesses and from the City's wastewater collection system.

IlIII Solid Waste Emissions are primarily from the greenhouse gases released when organic waste breaks down in landfills.

WHAT ARE CLIMATE HAZARDS?
Climate hazards are climate-related factors that impact communities. Costa Mesa's climate hazards include heat, air pollution, drought, and also flooding.

WHAT IS HEAT VULNERABILITY?
Heat vulnerability is determined by social and environmental indicators that influence how a community is impacted by extreme heat. For example, income or being a renter can influence a household's access to air conditioning, while a neighborhood's tree canopy influences how much heat is
experienced.

COSTA MESA CAAP
WHAT IS A CAAP?
A Climate Action & Adaptation Plan (CAAP) is a road map to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and prepare our community for the impacts of climate change. The City's CAAP seeks to:

Evaluate the City's GHG emissions and climate vulnerabilities.

Identify Gty-specific GHG reduction and adaptation goals.

Develop tailored actions to guide the City to align with statewide GHG reduction targets and build community resilience.

Outline an implementation framework for long-term success.

PROJECT BENEFITS
Improves Air Quality
Improves Mobility
Improves Public Health and
Safety
Enhances Natural
Environment
e
Supports Economy /
Job Creation
We Want to Hear From You!
Scan me to take the survey
Emai; [email protected] to be added to
the CAAP e-mail list.
-230-
360
Through a community collage exercise, community members contributed to a shared vision for Costa Mesa’s sustainable future. Participants answered the following question:
“A More Climate Friendly and Resilient Costa Mesa Is…”
Sustainable Costa Mesa Visioning
Let's Envision a More Climate Friendly and Resilient Costa Mesa! jlmaginemos una Costa Mesa Mds Resiliente y Respetuosa con el Clima! A More Climate Friendly and
Resilient Costa Mesa Is...

A More Climate Friendly and
Resilient Costa Mesa Is...

Resilient Costa Mesa Is...
-231-
361
Kids Activity
The event included a kid-friendly
activity where kids could draw their
vision for a sustainable Costa Mesa.

Over 50 children responded to the
following prompts :
• “Draw a picture of an Earth Friendly
Costa Mesa”
• “Draw how you would help the Earth
and create a greener Costa Mesa”
Various artistic mediums were provided:
markers, paint sticks, colored pencils,
etc.
a 5>a®MK?Q off aa 308*251 watte W^a
Naw Jjtf AjcU
Need nor* tine? Scan jour p^Lre and IW>I It so snstainabiUtgficoetaiwsaca.gov Need more tine’ Scan jour picture and enaU it to SMStainabilitg8costanesaoa.gov 2»®» iwaJ®
X ©iresiiw
WS&S
PeH.s yll
Need mere tine? Scan jow p^tare end ena.i >1 t: ssutainabd.tijficostamesaca.gov ^07 a jtaio’Ooff a® 'Ja^ib 'Sosi/a Moaa
Nanei.-^.k-L— Aje:_kt
Need more tine? Scan gour picture and enail it to sustainabilitg8costanesaca.gov i»ai7 Dm? g&a iz/^a
Wj) /Ld 3a?/!&
£1 ©'/i&JJi'J'
Waso
Need wore tine? Scan gour picture and «na.. it to susM.nabiUtgffictHtanesaca.gov -232-362
Many participants shared a vision
for a more sustainable Costa
Mesa that included the following:
• Increased renewable energy
sources such as solar.
• Additional trees and access to
accessible green space.
• Improved transportation
options as alternatives to car
travel, such biking, walking,
and public transit.

What We Heard
Energy
Trees / Urban Greening
Transportation
Solid Waste
Water
Economic Incentives
-233-
363
Community Priorities for Energy
“A City with more
solar panels on
homes”
“I wish we could use
more solar energy
to help our planet!”
Key Takeaways:
• Community members were
especially interested in solar
energy.
• Other energy-related
comments included more
chargers for electric vehicles
and other alternative energy
sources like wind. “Put more chargers
for electric cars”
-234-
364
“More gardens for
local fruits and
vegetables”
“More greenbelts and
parks – more water
absorption and better
health”
“More native
landscaping instead of
grass in medians, more
trees, and less concrete
wherever possible!”
Trees / Urban Greening
Key Takeaways:
• Participants showed a
strong interest more new
trees and native
landscaping, as well as
more parks and
community gardens.
-235-
365
“Ability to commute
on my bike to work
with a feeling of safety
while on the road”
“Where driving is
optional and not the
only available mode
for every trip”
Transportation
“More buses and
bigger buses”
Key Takeaways:
• There was a strong interest in
improved bike infrastructure and
safety such as protected bike
lanes.
• Community members also showed
support for improved public
transportation.
• Community members emphasized
a desire for accessible modes of
transportation as alternatives to
car travel.
-236- 366
Solid Waste
“Engage with rental
property owners for
recycling efforts”
“Clean up
trash, clean
up litter”
“Compost bins
everywhere”
Key Takeaways:
• Participants showed a
strong interest in
increasing compost and
recycling efforts in the
City, as well as reducing
litter.
-237-
367
Water
“Use less water"
“Stormwater capture,
bioswales, use biochar for
natural cleanup or
wetlands”
Key Takeaways:
• Community members
showed an interest in
stormwater capture.
• They also emphasized the
importance of conserving
water. “Turn off water
when we don’t
need it!”
-238-
368
The first Costa Mesa CAAP outreach event was a success, effectively engaging the Costa Mesa community in the planning process. The event’s inclusion of a kid-friendly activity ensured that community members of all ages could participate in the City's sustainability initiatives. Through both the in-person event and the online survey, more than 96 community members learned about the CAAP and shared their feedback and vision for a more sustainable and resilient Costa Mesa.

Costa Mesa City CouncilSeptember 15, 2026

Costa Mesa City Council
September 15, 2026