COST PROPOSAL 1
1. Calculate average hourly rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor
Subtotal
per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours
per Cost
Proposal
Avg Hourly
Rate
$ 200,292.60 / 3151 = $63.56 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
2. Calculate hourly rate for all periods (Increase the Average hourly rate for a period by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly
Rate
Proposed
Escalation
Year 1 $63.56 + 5% = $66.74
Year 2 $66.74 + 5% = $70.08
Year 3 $70.08 + 5% = $73.58 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $73.58 + 5% = $77.26 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated %
Completed
Each Period
Total Hours
per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours
per Period
Year 1 100.00% * 3151 = 3151 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * 3151 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * 3151 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * 3151 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * 3151 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% Total = 3151
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply average hourly rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly
Rate
Estimated
Hours
(calculated above) (calculated
above)
Year 1 $63.56 * 3151 = $200,292.60 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $66.74 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $70.08 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $73.58 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $77.26 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 5
= $200,292.60
= $200,292.60
= $0.00 Transfer to Page 1
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each period by total hou Cost
Per Period
5 Year
Contract Duration
Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
COST PROPOSAL 1
COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)
COST PROPOSAL 1
Name: Title*:
Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy): 8/20/2026 Email: Phone Number:
Address:
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
[email protected] 916-571-1017
555 Capital Mall, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA, 95814
*An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
Engineering Services
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of
6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
Fareed Pittalwala Vice President
Certification of Direct Costs:
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures COST PROPOSAL 1
Inspector General
California Department of Transportation
Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System (Note: If a Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate is approved, this form is not required) Consultant’s Full Legal Name:
Important: Consultant means the individual or consultant providing engineering and design related services as a party of a contract with a recipient or sub-recipient of Federal assistance. Therefore, the Indirect Cost Rate(s) shall not be combined with its parent company or subsidiaries.
Indirect Cost Rate (ICR):
Combined Rate: Or
Facilities Capital Cost of Money (if applicable):
Fiscal Period:*
* Fiscal period is annual one year applicable accounting period that the ICR was developed (not the contract period). The ICR is based on the to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
• All costs included in the cost proposal to establish the ICR(s) are allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Part 31 (48 CFR Part 31)
• The cost proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost principles of 48 CFR Part 31
• The accounting treatment and billing of prevailing wage delta costs are consistent with our prevailing wage policy as either direct labor, indirect costs, or other direct costs on all federally-funded A&E Consultant Contracts. •
I am providing the required and applicable documents as instructed on the Financial Document Review Request form.
Financial Management System:
records, and internal control adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, appropriately accounted for, are allocable to the contract, and comply with the federal requirements as set forth in Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 112(b)(2); 48 CFR Part 31.201-2(d); 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172.11(a)(2); and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. • Account numbers identifying allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable cost accounts; • Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable costs into separate cost accounts;
1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
195.87 175.19
0.88 01/01/2025 - 12/31/2025
• Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct costs by project, contract and type of cost; • • Ability to account and record costs consistently and to ensure costs billed are in compliance with FAR; • Ability to ensure and demonstrate costs billed reconcile to general ledgers and job costing system; and • Ability to ensure costs are in compliance with contract terms and federal and state requirement Cost Reimbursements on Contracts:
I also understand that failure to comply with 48 CFR Part 16.301-3 or knowingly charge unallowable costs to Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) contracts may result in possible penalties and sanctions as provided by the following:
• Sanctions and Penalties - 23 CFR Part 172.11(c)(4)
• False Claims Act - Title 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729-3733 • Statements or entries generally - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 • Major Fraud Act - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1031
All A&E Contract Information:
• Total participation amount ___________________ on all State and FAHP contracts for Architectural & • The number of states in which the consultant does business is • Years of consultant’s experience with 48 CFR Part 31 is • Cognizant ICR Audit Local Govt ICR Audit
Caltrans ICR Audit
CPA ICR Audit Federal Govt ICR Audit
I, the undersigned, certify all of the above to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I have reviewed the ICR Schedule to determine that any costs which are expressly unallowable under the Federal cost principles have been removed and comply with Title 23 U.S.C. Section 112(b)(2), 48 CFR Part 31, 23 CFR Part 172, and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. I also certify that I understand that all documentation of compliance must be retained by the consultant. I hereby acknowledge that costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement and must be returned to Caltrans.
Name ** Title**:
Signature: Date:
Phone**: Email**:
establish the indirect cost rate.
Note: Both prime and subconsultants as parties of a contract must complete their own forms. Caltrans will not Audits and Investigations.
2 406,420,412.00
50 25+
Tammy Flanagan Chief Financial Officer
(919) 677-2016 [email protected]
05/27/2026
COST PROPOSAL 1
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 9/10/2026
DIRECT LABOR
Hours
41 182
25 291
LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see Anticipated Salary Increases page for calculations) c) Total Direct Labor Costs [(a) + (b)] $ 23,913.00
INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits ( Rate: 0.00% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ - f) Overhead ( Rate: 139.94% ) $ 33,463.85
h) General and Administrative ( Rate: ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 33,463.85
FIXED FEE
k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)]* fixed fee 10% ] $ 5,737.69 Quantity Unit
1052.63 1
1 1
21 l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 9,625.69
Subconsultant 1: $
$ -
$ 9,625.69
$ 72,740.23
Classification/Title Name Actual Hourly Rate Total
COST PROPOSAL 1
COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
Arellano Associates, Inc
Creative Lead Kyle Santiago $59.00 $ 1,475.00
Project Coordinator Noah Kim $33.00 $ 9,603.00
Sr. Project Manager Jessica Harleaux $80.00 $ 3,280.00
Sr. Project Coordinator Jennifer Velazquez $52.50 $ 9,555.00 $ -
$ -
Mileage/Parking (up to 2 AA staff at up to 5 inperson events) $0.76 $ 800.00 Digital Engagement Tools/Paid Advertising $400.00 $ 400.00 $ 23,913.00
$ -
g) Overhead [(c) x (f)
l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Description of Item Unit Cost Total
(n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)]
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) (m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANS' COSTS
Direct Mailers (up to 4,000 properties; one round of
distributions) $ 4,125.69
Printing (up to 12, 36x48" boards; up to 30
evergreen lawn signs; up to 6 evergreen banners; up
to 200 fact sheets; up to 250 flyers total) $ 3,700.00
Outreach Supplies/Refreshments/Incentives (up to 2
rounds) $300.00 $ 600.00
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
January 2020
CML-5312(112)
COST PROPOSAL 1
Direct Labor
Subtotal per
Cost
Proposal
Total Hours
per Cost
Proposal
Avg Hourly
Rate
$ 23,913.00 / 539 = $44.37 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly
Rate
Proposed
Escalation
Year 1 $44.37 + 5% = $46.58
Year 2 $46.58 + 5% = $48.91
Year 3 $48.91 + 5% = $51.36 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $51.36 + 5% = $53.93 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each period by total hours) Estimated %
Completed
Each Period
Total Hours
per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours
per Period
Year 1 100.00% * 539 = 539 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * 539 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * 539 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * 539 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * 539 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% Total = 539
Avg Hourly
Rate
Estimated
Hours
(calculated
above)
(calculated
above)
Year 1 $44.37 * 539 = $23,913.00 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $46.58 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $48.91 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $51.36 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $53.93 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 5
= $23,913.00
= $23,913.00
= $0.00 Transfer to Page 1
COST PROPOSAL 1
Cost
Per Period
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Year 2 Avg Hourly
Year 3 Avg Hourly
Direct Labor Subtotal before escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
1. Calculate average hourly rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours)
2. Calculate hourly rate for all periods (Increase the Average hourly rate for a period by proposed escalation %)
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply average hourly rate by the number of hours)
COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)
5 Year
Contract Duration
January 2020
COST PROPOSAL 1
Name:
Signature:
Email:
Address:
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
5851 Pine Avenue, Suite A, Chino Hills, CA 91709
*An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
Public outreach, communications, stakeholder engagement Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
Genoveva L. Arellano Title*: President & CEO
Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy): 9/10/2026
[email protected] Phone Number: (909) 627-2974
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of
6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
COST PROPOSAL 1
Certification of Direct Costs:
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
January 2020
&HUWL¿FDWLRQRI,QGLUHFW&RVWVDQG)LQDQFLDO0DQDJHPHQW6\VWHP,QGHSHQGHQW2I¿FHRI$XGLWVDQG,QYHVWLJDWLRQV5HYLVHG
Inspector General
California Department of Transportation
Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System (Note: If a Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate is approved, this form is not required) Consultant’s Full Legal Name:
Important: Consultant means the individual or consultant providing engineering and design related services as a party of a contract with a recipient or sub-recipient of Federal assistance. Therefore, the Indirect Cost Rate(s) shall not be combined with its parent company or subsidiaries.
Indirect Cost Rate (ICR):
Combined Rate: Or
+RPH2ႈFH5DWH
DQG)LHOG2ႈFH5DWH
LIDSSOLFDEOH
Facilities Capital Cost of Money (if applicable):
Fiscal Period:*
* Fiscal period is annual one year applicable accounting period that the ICR was developed (not the contract period). The ICR is based on the FRQVXOWDQW¶VRQH\HDUDSSOLFDEOHDFFRXQWLQJSHULRGIRUZKLFKILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDUHUHJXODUO\SUHSDUHGE\WKHFRQVXOWDQW ,KDYHUHYLHZHGWKHSURSRVDOWRHVWDEOLVKDQ,&5
V
IRUWKHILVFDOSHULRGDVVSHFLILHGDERYHDQGKDYHGHWHUPLQHG to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
• All costs included in the cost proposal to establish the ICR(s) are allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Part 31 (48 CFR Part 31)
• The cost proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost principles of 48 CFR Part 31
• The accounting treatment and billing of prevailing wage delta costs are consistent with our prevailing wage policy as either direct labor, indirect costs, or other direct costs on all federally-funded A&E Consultant Contracts.
• $OONQRZQPDWHULDOWUDQVDFWLRQVRUHYHQWVWKDWKDYHRFFXUUHGVXEVHTXHQWWR\HDUHQGDIIHFWLQJWKHFRQVXOWDQW¶V RZQHUVKLSRUJDQL]DWLRQDQGLQGLUHFWFRVWUDWHVKDYHEHHQGLVFORVHGDVRIWKHGDWHRIWKLVFHUWLILFDWLRQ I am providing the required and applicable documents as instructed on the Financial Document Review Request form.
Financial Management System:
2XUODERUFKDUJLQJMREFRVWLQJDQGDFFRXQWLQJV\VWHPVPHHWWKHVWDQGDUGVIRU¿QDQFLDOUHSRUWLQJDFFRXQWLQJ records, and internal control adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, appropriately accounted for, are allocable to the contract, and comply with the federal requirements as set forth in Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 112(b)(2); 48 CFR Part 31.201-2(d); 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172.11(a)(2); and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. 2XU¿QDQFLDOPDQDJHPHQWV\VWHPKDVWKHIROORZLQJDWWULEXWHV
• Account numbers identifying allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable cost accounts; • Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable costs into separate cost accounts;
1 Arellano Associates, Inc.
139.94
1/1/2024 - 12/31/2024
&HUWL¿FDWLRQRI,QGLUHFW&RVWVDQG)LQDQFLDO0DQDJHPHQW6\VWHP,QGHSHQGHQW2I¿FHRI$XGLWVDQG,QYHVWLJDWLRQV5HYLVHG
• Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct costs by project, contract and type of cost; • ,QWHUQDOFRQWUROVWRPDLQWDLQLQWHJULW\RIILQDQFLDOPDQDJHPHQWV\VWHP
• Ability to account and record costs consistently and to ensure costs billed are in compliance with FAR; • Ability to ensure and demonstrate costs billed reconcile to general ledgers and job costing system; and • Ability to ensure costs are in compliance with contract terms and federal and state requirementV Cost Reimbursements on Contracts:
I also understand that failure to comply with 48 CFR Part 16.301-3 or knowingly charge unallowable costs to Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) contracts may result in possible penalties and sanctions as provided by the following:
• Sanctions and Penalties - 23 CFR Part 172.11(c)(4)
• False Claims Act - Title 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729-3733 • Statements or entries generally - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 • Major Fraud Act - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1031
All A&E Contract Information:
• Total participation amount ___________________ on all State and FAHP contracts for Architectural & (QJLQHHULQJVHUYLFHVWKDWWKHFRQVXOWDQWUHFHLYHGLQWKHODVWWKUHHILVFDOSHULRGV • The number of states in which the consultant does business is • Years of consultant’s experience with 48 CFR Part 31 is • ,GHQWLI\WKHW\SHRIDXGLWVOLVWHGEHORZWKDWWKHFRQVXOWDQWKDVKDGSHUIRUPHG LIDSSOLFDEOH
Cognizant ICR Audit Local Govt ICR Audit
Caltrans ICR Audit
CPA ICR Audit Federal Govt ICR Audit
I, the undersigned, certify all of the above to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I have reviewed the ICR Schedule to determine that any costs which are expressly unallowable under the Federal cost principles have been removed and comply with Title 23 U.S.C. Section 112(b)(2), 48 CFR Part 31, 23 CFR Part 172, and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. I also certify that I understand that all documentation of compliance must be retained by the consultant. I hereby acknowledge that costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement and must be returned to Caltrans.
Name
** Title**:
Signature: Date:
Phone**: Email**:
$QLQGLYLGXDOH[HFXWLYHRU¿QDQFLDORႈFHURIWKHFRQVXOWDQW¶VRUVXEFRQVXOWDQW¶VRUJDQL]DWLRQDWDOHYHOQRORZHUWKDQD 9LFH3UHVLGHQWD&KLHI)LQDQFLDO2ႈFHURUHTXLYDOHQWZKRKDVDXWKRULW\WRUHSUHVHQWWKH¿QDQFLDOLQIRUPDWLRQXVHGWR establish the indirect cost rate.
Note: Both prime and subconsultants as parties of a contract must complete their own forms. Caltrans will not SURFHVVORFDODJHQF\¶VLQYRLFHVXQWLODFRPSOHWHIRUPLVDFFHSWHGDQGDSSURYHGE\WKH,QGHSHQGHQW2ႈFHRI Audits and Investigations.
2 7,000,000.00
1 15
Genoveva L. Arellano
✔
President & CEO
✔
(909) 627-2974 [email protected]
08/24/2026
COST PROPOSAL 1
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 8/20/2026
DIRECT LABOR
Hours
2 24
42 30
LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see Anticipated Salary Increases page for calculations) c) Total Direct Labor Costs [(a) + (b)] $ 5,176.10
INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits ( Rate: 79.00% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 4,089.12 f) Overhead ( Rate: 91.00% ) $ 4,710.25
h) General and Administrative ( Rate: ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 8,799.37
FIXED FEE
k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)]* fixed fee 10% ] $ 1,397.55 Quantity Unit
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ -
Subconsultant 1: $
Subconsultant 2: $
Subconsultant 3: $
Subconsultant 4: $
$ -
$ -
$ 15,373.02
(n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)]
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) (m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANS' COSTS
$0.00 $ -
$0.00 $ -
$0.00 $ -
$0.00 $ -
$ 5,176.10
$ -
g) Overhead [(c) x (f)
l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Description of Item Unit Cost Total
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Program Manager Keith LeNoue $49.63 $ 2,084.46
Program Coordinator Alyssa Maldonado $33.00 $ 990.00
Program Director Lissette Montoya $150.82 $ 301.64
Program Manager Nadine El Sankari $75.00 $ 1,800.00
CML-5312(112)
Classification/Title Name Actual Hourly Rate Total
COST PROPOSAL 1
COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
Advanced Avant Garde Inc.
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
January 2020
COST PROPOSAL 1
1. Calculate average hourly rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor
Subtotal per
Cost
Proposal
Total Hours
per Cost
Proposal
Avg Hourly
Rate
$ 5,176.10 / 98 = $52.82 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
2. Calculate hourly rate for all periods (Increase the Average hourly rate for a period by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly
Rate
Proposed
Escalation
Year 1 $52.82 + 5% = $55.46
Year 2 $55.46 + 5% = $58.23
Year 3 $58.23 + 5% = $61.14 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $61.14 + 5% = $64.20 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each period by total hours) Estimated %
Completed
Each Period
Total Hours
per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours
per Period
Year 1 100.00% * 98 = 98 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * 98 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * 98 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * 98 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * 98 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% Total = 98
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply average hourly rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly
Rate
Estimated
Hours
(calculated
above)
(calculated
above)
Year 1 $52.82 * 98 = $5,176.10 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $55.46 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $58.23 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $61.14 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $64.20 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 5
= $5,176.10
= $5,176.10
= $0.00 Transfer to Page 1
Direct Labor Subtotal before escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
Cost
Per Period
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Year 2 Avg Hourly
Year 3 Avg Hourly
COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)
5 Year
Contract Duration
COST PROPOSAL 1
January 2020
COST PROPOSAL 1
Name: Title*:
Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy): 8/20/2026 Email: Phone Number:
Address:
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
807 S Lemon Ave., Diamond Bar, CA 91789
*An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
Funding Adminsitration Services
Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
Ana Marie LeNoue President/CEO
ana Marie LeNoue
[email protected] (909) 895-7146
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of
6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
COST PROPOSAL 1
Certification of Direct Costs:
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
January 2020
Inspector General
California Department of Transportation
Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System (Note: If a Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate is approved, this form is not required) Consultant's Full Legal Name: _______________________ _ Important: Consultant means the individual or consultant providing engineering and design related services as a party of a contract with a recipient or sub-recipient of Federal assistance. Therefore, the Indirect Cost Rate(s} shall not be combined with its parent company or subsidiaries.
Indirect Cost Rate (ICR):
C b• dR t 170.00
om me ae: ________ _ Or
Home Office Rate: ________ _ and Field Office Rate (if applicable}: _______ _ Facilities Capital Cost of Money (if applicable): _________________ _ F
. Ip . d * 01/01/2025-12/31/2025
Isca er10 :
• Fiscal period is annual one year applicable accounting period that the ICR was developed (not the contract period). The ICR is based on the consultant's one-year applicable accounting period for which financial statements are regularly prepared by the consultant.
I have reviewed the proposal to establish an ICR(s) for the fiscal period as specified above and have determined to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
• All costs included in the cost proposal to establish the ICR(s} are allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Part 31 (48 CFR Part 31 ).
• The cost proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost principles of 48 CFR Part 31.
• The accounting treatment and billing of prevailing wage delta costs are consistent with our prevailing wage policy as either direct labor, indirect costs, or other direct costs on all federally-funded A&E Consultant Contracts.
• All known material transactions or events that have occurred subsequent to year-end affecting the consultant's ownership, organization, and indirect cost rates have been disclosed as of the date of this certification.
I am providing the required and applicable documents as instructed on the Financial Document Review Request form.
Financial Management System:
Our labor charging, job costing, and accounting systems meet the standards for financial reporting, accounting records, and internal control adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, appropriately accounted for, are allocable to the contract, and comply with the federal requirements as set forth in Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.} Section 112(b}(2): 48 CFR Part 31.201-2(d): 23 CFR Chapter 1, Part 172.11(a)(2):
and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations.
Our financial management system has the following attributes:
• Account numbers identifying allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable cost accounts; • Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable costs into separate cost accounts:
Certific.ation of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System - Independent Office of Audits and Investigations - Revised 9/2022 Advanced Avant Garde, Inc.
• Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct costs by project, contract and type of cost; • Internal controls to maintain integrity of financial management system; • Ability to account and record costs consistently and to ensure costs billed are in compliance with FAR; • Ability to ensure and demonstrate costs billed reconcile to general ledgers and job costing system; and • Ability to ensure costs are in compliance with contract terms and federal and state requirements.
Cost Reimbursements on Contracts:
I also understand that failure to comply with 48 CFR Part 16.301-3 or knowingly charge unallowable costs to Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) contracts may result in possible penalties and sanctions as provided by the following:
• Sanctions and Penalties -23 CFR Part 172.11(c)(4)
• False Claims Act - Title 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729-3733 • Statements or entries generally - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 • Major Fraud Act - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1031
All A&E Contract Information:
• Total participation amount 24, 923-94 on all State and FAHP contracts for Architectural & Engineering services that the consultant received in the last three fiscal periods. • The number of states in which the consultant does business is _ 1-'----
• Years of consultant's experience with 48 CFR Part 31 is -=2.,,,0 ___ _ • Identify the type of audits listed below that the consultant has had performed (if applicable):
Cognizant ICRAudit D
CPA ICR Audit IZI
Local Govt ICR Audit □
Federal Govt ICR Audit □
Caltrans ICR Audit □
1, the undersigned, certify all of the above to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I have reviewed the ICR Schedule to determine that any costs which are expressly unallowable under the Federal cost principles have been removed and comply with Title 23 U.S.C. Section 112(b)(2), 48 CFR Part 31, 23 CFR Part 172, and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. I also certify that I understand that all documentation of compliance must be retained by the consultant. I hereby acknowledge that costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement and must be returned to Caltrans.
Phone**: (909) 895-7146
Title**: PresidenUCEO
07/06/2026 Date:
Email**: [email protected]
,..An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President, a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial infom,ation used to establish the indirect cost rate.
Note: Both prime and subconsultants as parties of a contract must complete their own forms. Caltrans will not process local agency's invoices until a complete form is accepted and approved by the Independent Office of Audits and Investigations.
Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System - Independent Office of Audits and Investigations - Revised 9/2022 2 COST PROPOSAL 1
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 9/10/2026
DIRECT LABOR
Hours
60 LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see Anticipated Salary Increases page for calculations) c) Total Direct Labor Costs [(a) + (b)] $ 7,200.00
INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits ( Rate: ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ - f) Overhead ( Rate: 120.00% ) $ 8,640.00
h) General and Administrative ( Rate: ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 8,640.00
FIXED FEE
k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)]* fixed fee 10% ] $ 1,584.00 Quantity Unit
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ -
Subconsultant 1: $
Subconsultant 2: $
Subconsultant 3: $
Subconsultant 4: $
$ -
$ -
$ 17,424.00
(n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)]
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) (m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANS' COSTS
$0.00 $ -
$0.00 $ -
$0.00 $ -
$0.00 $ -
$ 7,200.00
$ -
g) Overhead [(c) x (f)
l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Description of Item Unit Cost Total
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Firm Principal Rock Miller $120.00 $ 7,200.00
$ -
CML-5312(112)
Classification/Title Name Actual Hourly Rate Total
COST PROPOSAL 1
COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
Rock E. Miller & Associates
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
January 2020
COST PROPOSAL 1
1. Calculate average hourly rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor
Subtotal per
Cost Proposal
Total Hours
per Cost
Proposal
Avg Hourly
Rate
$ 7,200.00 / 60 = $120.00 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
2. Calculate hourly rate for all periods (Increase the Average hourly rate for a period by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly
Rate
Proposed
Escalation
Year 1 $120.00 + 5% = $126.00
Year 2 $126.00 + 5% = $132.30
Year 3 $132.30 + 5% = $138.92 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $138.92 + 5% = $145.86 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each period by total hours) Estimated %
Completed
Each Period
Total Hours
per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours
per Period
Year 1 100.00% * 60 = 60 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * 60 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * 60 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * 60 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * 60 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% Total = 60
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply average hourly rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly
Rate
Estimated
Hours
(calculated
above)
(calculated
above)
Year 1 $120.00 * 60 = $7,200.00 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $126.00 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $132.30 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $138.92 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $145.86 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 5
= $7,200.00
= $7,200.00
= $0.00 Transfer to Page 1
Direct Labor Subtotal before escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
Cost
Per Period
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Year 2 Avg Hourly
Year 3 Avg Hourly
COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)
5 Year
Contract Duration
COST PROPOSAL 1
January 2020
COST PROPOSAL 1
Name:
Signature:
Email: Phone Number:
Address:
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of
6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
COST PROPOSAL 1
Certification of Direct Costs:
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
5731 E. West View Dr, Orange CA 92869
*An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
Phase I: Participate in kick off meeting with the City and provide insight. Phase II: Participate in preliminary Engineering, development of concept Plans, assistance in intersection treatments at Fairview Rd. and at Harbor Bl.
Assistance in preliminary engineering for roundabout at Fordham per RFP. Phase III: Participate in qualitative assessment of intersection treatments, including potential use of bicycle signals and connections to the existing Class I facilities at Harbor Boulevard and Fairview Road and traffic signals along the Fairgrounds frontage. Phase IV: Attend City Council Meeting and two ATC meetings, and available to meet for up to 4 additional meetings in person. Phase V: Advise on preparation of 30% drawings by reviewing progress drawings with design team. Assist in review and response to submittal of 30% drawings.
Phase VI: Provide hours to review preliminary traffic analysis and response to traffic and bikeway engineering comments.
Phase VII: Advise on preparation of 60%, 90%, 100%, and final drawings by reviewing progress drawings with design team Assist in review and response to comments on prior phase drawings Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
Rock Miller Title*: Firm Principal
Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy)
[email protected] 714-743-1415
January 2020
09/10/2026
California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 1
Consultant Firm Certification of Eligibility and Certification of Financial Management System
Consultant Firm Name _____________________________________________________________ Local Agency (if applicable) _______________________________________________________ Contract Number / Federal Project Number _____ _________________________
1. Am not a Prime Consultant Firm on a Caltrans contract > $3.5M, or Local Government contract > $1M, regardless of the participation amount.
2. Have not used SHR for more than three (3) years since entering the program on a state or federally funded contract.
AND
1. Do not have relevant contract cost history to use as a base for developing a Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) of Title 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 31 compliant ICR.
2. Do not have a previously accepted ICR by a cognizant agency, or with an audited/accepted actual ICR, and do not have an existing contract with a provisional rate.
Certification of Financial Management System
I, the undersigned, certify that our financial management system in place for this contract and moving forward meets the standards for the Safe Harbor indirect cost rate requirements and financial reporting, accounting records, internal and budget control as set forth in 2 CFR 200, Subpart D. These standards require consulting firms have an accounting system
Contract Total $ __________________________________________________________________ For Subconsultant Firms – estimated % of work to be performed ____________________ %
Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate (SHR): Home: 120% and/or Field: 90% Field SHR will be utilized for contracts where the work deliverables are not completed from the consultant offices (i.e. Construction Inspection, Material Testing, Sources Inspection, others).
Consultant Firm Certification of Eligibility
I, the undersigned, certify that I am eligible to use the Safe Harbor indirect cost rate as I:
City of Costa Mesa
CML-5312(112
17,424
California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 2
adequate to accumulate, and track allowable, allocable, and reasonable direct labor and other direct costs by contract; segregate indirect costs and remove unallowable costs.
Print Name ________________________________________________ Signature ________________________________________________ (Electronic Signature Allowed)
Title ________________________________________________
Date Completed _______________________
Note: The certification of this Safe Harbor Rate was made by, and are the responsibility of, the Company’s management.
Definition of Terms
Direct Cost is any cost that is identified specifically with a particular cost objective. Direct costs are not limited to items that are incorporated in the end products as material or labor.
Costs identified specifically with a contract are direct costs of that contract. All costs identified with other final cost objectives of the contractor are direct costs of those objectives, 48 CFR 31.202.
Indirect or overhead cost is any cost that is not directly identified with a single final cost objective but is identified with two or more final cost objectives or with at least one intermediate cost objective, 48 CFR 31. 203.
References
Title 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 31 -Federal cost principles.
Title 48 CFR Chapter 99, Subchapter B - Procurement Practices and Cost Accounting Standards.
Title is 2 CFR 200 Subpart D, Standards for Financial and Program Management.
Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.), Chapter 1, Section 112 - Letting of Contracts.
Title 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Services.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Uniform Audit & Accounting Guide (2016 Edition).
California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 3
Caltrans Contract
If participating on a Caltrans Contract, also attach a completed copy of the following Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Questionnaire for Evaluating Consultant Firm’s Financial Management System.
California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 4
Questionnaire for Evaluating Consultant Firm’s Financial Management System
Consultant Firm Name _____________________________________________________________ Firm Headquarters Address _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ Accounting Records
x Location where Accounting records are held ________________________ x Name and Title _____________________________________________________ x Email and Phone ____________________________________________________ x Mailing Address _____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________
To be eligible for Safe Harbor indirect cost rate (SHR), the Consultant Firm’s financial management system must be adequate to accumulate and track direct labor and other direct costs by contract, segregate indirect costs, and remove unallowable costs in accordance with 48 CFR 31 for the different business segments.
Instructions
1. Answer all questions and provide an explanation and additional supporting documentation where requested.
2. If additional space is required, please attach a separate sheet and refer to items being answered by number.
Has the Firm developed an indirect cost rate in the past? Yes ____ No ___ If “Yes”, you are NOT ELIGIBLE to use the SHR.
DO NOT CONTINUE with this Questionnaire and please complete the AASHTO Appendix B ICQ and provide an ICR Schedule.
Is the Firm a Prime Consultant Firm on a Caltrans contract > $3.5M Yes ____ No ___ Or Local Government contract > $1M, regardless of the participation Amount?
If “Yes”, you are NOT ELIGIBLE to use the SHR.
DO NOT CONTINUE with this Questionnaire and please complete the AASHTO Appendix B ICQ and provide an AUDITED ICR Report.
California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 5
1. What form of business entity is the Firm?
Sole Proprietorship ___ Partnership ____ C Corporation __ S Corporation __ Other __________________________________________________
2. What types of services will the Firm provide for this contract? (Select all that apply.) Architectural and Engineering Services ____ Program Management ____ Preliminary Engineering ____ Design Engineering ____
Surveying ____ Feasibility Studies ____
Mapping or Architectural Related Services ____ Other _____________________
3. Does the Firm have prior government contracting experience? Yes ____ No ____
4. Does the general ledger contain separate direct and indirect accounts for the following? Labor Yes ___ No _____ Non-Labor Yes ____ No ____
5. Does the company have a system in place to identify and remove form the indirect cost pools all unallowable cost? Yes_____ No ____
6. Does the firm assign a unique identification/project number in your accounting system for each contract/project?
Yes _____ No _____
7. Is indirect and direct labor separated by contract/project/cost objectives on employee timesheets with unique reporting codes?
Yes _____ No _____
California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 6
8. Do you have written policies on the following cost categories? Accounting Yes ___ No ____ Overtime Yes _____ No ____
Billing Yes ___ No ____ Direct/Indirect Expenses Yes _____ No ____ Timesheet Preparation Yes ___ No ____ Prevailing Wage Yes _____ No ____ Bonus Yes ___ No ____
9. What types of employee status will the Firm provide for this contract? Non-exempt ____ Exempt-salaried ___ Exempt-hourly ___ Contract Employee ___ Other __________________________________________________
10.Does the Firm pay overtime for exempt employees?
Yes _____ No ___
11.Besides labor, does the Firm normally bill/invoice the following as direct contract/project costs? (Select all that apply)
Vehicle _____ Shipping ______
Computer/CADD _____ Lab ______
Printing _____ Travel ______
Specialty Equipment ____
(List below)
Other (List below) ______
_________________________________ ______________________________
12. Are mileage logs maintained for all vehicles? If no, please explain below.
Explanation _____________________________________________________________________ Where is the vehicle stored after work? ___________________________________________ Does employee use vehicle for personal use? Yes ______________________ No_______ What is the recovery/billing rate used for Firm or personal vehicle mileage reimbursement?
$ ________ per mile
California Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Program
SHR Form Revised 9/25/2020 7
I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief the responses to this questionnaire are accurate.
Print Name ________________________________________________ Signature ________________________________________________ (Electronic Signature Allowed)
Title ________________________________________________
Date Completed _______________________
Note: The certification of this Safe Harbor Rate was made by, and are the responsibility of, the Company’s management.
COST PROPOSAL 1
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 9/10/2026
DIRECT LABOR
Hours
32 16
8 LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see Anticipated Salary Increases page for calculations) c) Total Direct Labor Costs [(a) + (b)] $ 5,320.32
INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits ( Rate: 74.17% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 3,946.08 f) Overhead ( Rate: 57.94% ) $ 3,082.59
h) General and Administrative ( Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 7,028.67
FIXED FEE
k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)]* fixed fee 10% ] $ 1,234.90 Quantity Unit
1 1
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 29,200.00
Subconsultant 1: $ 3,000.00
Subconsultant 2:
Subconsultant 3: $
Subconsultant 4: $
$ 3,000.00
$ 32,200.00
$ 45,783.89
CML-5312(112)
Classification/Title Name Actual Hourly Rate Total
COST PROPOSAL 1
COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
Twining Inc.
Group 3 (Non exempt) Group 3 Inspector $67.96 $ 543.68
$ -
Project Engineer Amir Ghavibazoo * $93.49 $ 2,991.68
Registered Geotechnical Engineer Paul Soltis * $111.56 $ 1,784.96 $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Laboratory Testing $2,600.00 $ 2,600.00
$ 5,320.32
$ -
g) Overhead [(c) x (f)
l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Description of Item Unit Cost Total
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Traffic Management (for pavement Coring)
(m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANS' COSTS
ADL Soil Sampling Support $ 26,600.00
(n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)]
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
January 2020
COST PROPOSAL 1
1. Calculate average hourly rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal
per Cost Proposal
Total Hours
per Cost
Proposal
Avg Hourly
Rate
$ 5,320.32 / 56 = $95.01 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
2. Calculate hourly rate for all periods (Increase the Average hourly rate for a period by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly Rate Proposed
Escalation
Year 1 $95.01 + 5% = $99.76
Year 2 $99.76 + 5% = $104.74
Year 3 $104.74 + 5% = $109.98 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $109.98 + 5% = $115.48 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each period by total hours) Estimated %
Completed Each
Period
Total Hours
per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours
per Period
Year 1 100.00% * 56 = 56 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * 56 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * 56 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * 56 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * 56 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% Total = 56
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply average hourly rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated
Hours
(calculated above) (calculated
above)
Year 1 $95.01 * 56 = $5,320.32 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $99.76 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $104.74 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $109.98 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $115.48 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 5
= $5,320.32
= $5,320.32
= $0.00 Transfer to Page 1
COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)
5 Year
Contract Duration
COST PROPOSAL 1
Cost
Per Period
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Year 2 Avg Hourly
Year 3 Avg Hourly
Direct Labor Subtotal before escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
January 2020
COST PROPOSAL 1
Name: Title*:
Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):
Email: Phone Number:
Address:
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of
6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
COST PROPOSAL 1
Certification of Direct Costs:
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
*An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
January 2020
Tommy Y Lee CFO
9/10/26
[email protected] 562-513-1705
4811 Airport plaza dr. Suite 220 Long Beach, CA 90815
&HUWL¿FDWLRQRI,QGLUHFW&RVWVDQG)LQDQFLDO0DQDJHPHQW6\VWHP,QGHSHQGHQW2I¿FHRI$XGLWVDQG,QYHVWLJDWLRQV5HYLVHG
Inspector General
California Department of Transportation
Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System (Note: If a Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate is approved, this form is not required) Consultant’s Full Legal Name:
Important: Consultant means the individual or consultant providing engineering and design related services as a party of a contract with a recipient or sub-recipient of Federal assistance. Therefore, the Indirect Cost Rate(s) shall not be combined with its parent company or subsidiaries.
Indirect Cost Rate (ICR):
Combined Rate: Or
+RPH2ႈFH5DWH
DQG)LHOG2ႈFH5DWH
LIDSSOLFDEOH
Facilities Capital Cost of Money (if applicable):
Fiscal Period:*
* Fiscal period is annual one year applicable accounting period that the ICR was developed (not the contract period). The ICR is based on the FRQVXOWDQW¶VRQH\HDUDSSOLFDEOHDFFRXQWLQJSHULRGIRUZKLFKILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDUHUHJXODUO\SUHSDUHGE\WKHFRQVXOWDQW ,KDYHUHYLHZHGWKHSURSRVDOWRHVWDEOLVKDQ,&5
V
IRUWKHILVFDOSHULRGDVVSHFLILHGDERYHDQGKDYHGHWHUPLQHG to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
• All costs included in the cost proposal to establish the ICR(s) are allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Part 31 (48 CFR Part 31)
• The cost proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost principles of 48 CFR Part 31
• The accounting treatment and billing of prevailing wage delta costs are consistent with our prevailing wage policy as either direct labor, indirect costs, or other direct costs on all federally-funded A&E Consultant Contracts.
• $OONQRZQPDWHULDOWUDQVDFWLRQVRUHYHQWVWKDWKDYHRFFXUUHGVXEVHTXHQWWR\HDUHQGDIIHFWLQJWKHFRQVXOWDQW¶V RZQHUVKLSRUJDQL]DWLRQDQGLQGLUHFWFRVWUDWHVKDYHEHHQGLVFORVHGDVRIWKHGDWHRIWKLVFHUWLILFDWLRQ I am providing the required and applicable documents as instructed on the Financial Document Review Request form.
Financial Management System:
2XUODERUFKDUJLQJMREFRVWLQJDQGDFFRXQWLQJV\VWHPVPHHWWKHVWDQGDUGVIRU¿QDQFLDOUHSRUWLQJDFFRXQWLQJ records, and internal control adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, appropriately accounted for, are allocable to the contract, and comply with the federal requirements as set forth in Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 112(b)(2); 48 CFR Part 31.201-2(d); 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172.11(a)(2); and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. 2XU¿QDQFLDOPDQDJHPHQWV\VWHPKDVWKHIROORZLQJDWWULEXWHV
• Account numbers identifying allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable cost accounts; • Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable costs into separate cost accounts;
1 Twining, Inc.
132.11
0.51 01/01/2024-12/31/2024
&HUWL¿FDWLRQRI,QGLUHFW&RVWVDQG)LQDQFLDO0DQDJHPHQW6\VWHP,QGHSHQGHQW2I¿FHRI$XGLWVDQG,QYHVWLJDWLRQV5HYLVHG
• Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct costs by project, contract and type of cost; • ,QWHUQDOFRQWUROVWRPDLQWDLQLQWHJULW\RIILQDQFLDOPDQDJHPHQWV\VWHP
• Ability to account and record costs consistently and to ensure costs billed are in compliance with FAR; • Ability to ensure and demonstrate costs billed reconcile to general ledgers and job costing system; and • Ability to ensure costs are in compliance with contract terms and federal and state requirementV Cost Reimbursements on Contracts:
I also understand that failure to comply with 48 CFR Part 16.301-3 or knowingly charge unallowable costs to Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) contracts may result in possible penalties and sanctions as provided by the following:
• Sanctions and Penalties - 23 CFR Part 172.11(c)(4)
• False Claims Act - Title 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729-3733 • Statements or entries generally - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 • Major Fraud Act - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1031
All A&E Contract Information:
• Total participation amount ___________________ on all State and FAHP contracts for Architectural & (QJLQHHULQJVHUYLFHVWKDWWKHFRQVXOWDQWUHFHLYHGLQWKHODVWWKUHHILVFDOSHULRGV • The number of states in which the consultant does business is • Years of consultant’s experience with 48 CFR Part 31 is • ,GHQWLI\WKHW\SHRIDXGLWVOLVWHGEHORZWKDWWKHFRQVXOWDQWKDVKDGSHUIRUPHG LIDSSOLFDEOH
Cognizant ICR Audit Local Govt ICR Audit
Caltrans ICR Audit
CPA ICR Audit Federal Govt ICR Audit
I, the undersigned, certify all of the above to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I have reviewed the ICR Schedule to determine that any costs which are expressly unallowable under the Federal cost principles have been removed and comply with Title 23 U.S.C. Section 112(b)(2), 48 CFR Part 31, 23 CFR Part 172, and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. I also certify that I understand that all documentation of compliance must be retained by the consultant. I hereby acknowledge that costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement and must be returned to Caltrans.
Name
** Title**:
Signature: Date:
Phone**: Email**:
$QLQGLYLGXDOH[HFXWLYHRU¿QDQFLDORႈFHURIWKHFRQVXOWDQW¶VRUVXEFRQVXOWDQW¶VRUJDQL]DWLRQDWDOHYHOQRORZHUWKDQD 9LFH3UHVLGHQWD&KLHI)LQDQFLDO2ႈFHURUHTXLYDOHQWZKRKDVDXWKRULW\WRUHSUHVHQWWKH¿QDQFLDOLQIRUPDWLRQXVHGWR establish the indirect cost rate.
Note: Both prime and subconsultants as parties of a contract must complete their own forms. Caltrans will not SURFHVVORFDODJHQF\¶VLQYRLFHVXQWLODFRPSOHWHIRUPLVDFFHSWHGDQGDSSURYHGE\WKH,QGHSHQGHQW2ႈFHRI Audits and Investigations.
2 6,100,000.00
1 10.
Tommy Young Lee
✔
CFO
Digitally signed by T Young Lee
Date: 2025.11.20 11:41:01 -08'00'
(562) 426-3355 [email protected]
11/20/2025
EXHIBIT D
CITY COUNCIL POLICY 100-5
EXHIBIT E
ARTICLE XXXI TITLE VI ASSURANCES
APPENDICES A – E OF THE TITLE VI ASSURANCES
EXHIBIT F
ARTICLE III STATEMENT OF WORK
EXHIBIT G
ARTICLE IV PERFORMANCE PERIOD
EXHIBIT H
ARTICLE V ALLOWABLE COSTS AND PAYMENTS
EXHIBIT I
ARTICLE VII COST PRINCIPLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
EXHIBIT J
ARTICLE X SUBCONTRACTING
EXHIBIT K
ARTICLE XI EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND OTHER CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
EXHIBIT L
ARTICLE XII STATE PREVAILING WAGE RATES
EXHIBIT M
ARTICLE XIII CONFLICT OF INTEREST
EXHIBIT N
ARTICLE XIV REBATES, KICKBACKS OR OTHER UNLAWFUL CONSIDERATION
EXHIBIT O
ARTICLE XV PROHIBITION OF EXPENDING
LOCAL AGENCY, STATE, OR FEDERAL FUNDS FOR LOBBYING
EXHIBIT P
ARTICLE XVI NON-DISCRIMINATION CLAUSE AND STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
EXHIBIT Q
ARTICLE XVII DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT R
ARTICLE XX FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
EXHIBIT S
ARTICLE XXI CHANGE IN TERMS
EXHIBIT T
ARTICLE XXIII DISPUTES
EXHIBIT U
ARTICLE XXIV INSPECTION OF WORK
EXHIBIT V
ARTICLE XXV SAFETY
EXHIBIT W
ARTICLE XXXIII CONTRACT