Agenda packet — Cotati City Council, May 13, 2025 (part 1 of 3)

AGENDA

JOINT MEETING OF THE COTATI CITY COUNCIL AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

FORMER COTATI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
City Council Chamber, City Hall 201 W. Sierra Avenue
Tuesday, May 13, 2025
6:00 PM REGULAR MEETING
The Cotati City Council welcomes you to its meetings that are generally scheduled for the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. Your interest and participation are encouraged and appreciated.

City Council meeting agendas, minutes and recordings are posted on the City’s Meeting Portal at www.cotaticity.gov. For questions about the agenda or to receive the City Council agenda by e-mail, contact the Deputy City Clerk at [email protected] or 707-665-3622.

Cotati City Council Meetings will be conducted in person in the Council Chamber. To guarantee your ability to participate, you must attend the meeting in person. As a courtesy to the public, the City allows citizens the opportunity to view and offer public comments virtually through Zoom Online video conferencing platform. Technical difficulties may occur that make the Zoom platform unavailable. If Zoom is unavailable, the meeting will continue. Participants considering using Zoom should consider attending in person, if they desire to ensure their ability to view the meeting and offer public comments.

Subject to the above disclaimer, Zoom Online video conferencing is available to watch or listen in the following ways:

1. Using the following online livestream meeting portal link: https://www.youtube.com/@cityofcotati7280/streams

2. Cable T.V. Broadcast, local channel 28
Members of the public can participate in the meeting online by clicking the link below:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81498587513?pwd=P6miQbrYLW3mr01F8NRbkdEfLqpBA4.1 If you do not have the ability to join online, but would like to participate in the meeting, you can call into the meeting using your telephone, by dialing one of the following numbers and entering the meeting credentials:

Webinar ID: 814 9858 7513 Passcode: 945531
+1 (669) 900-6833 or +1 (346) 248-7799 or +1 (253) 215-8782 or +1 (301) 715-8592 or +1 (312) 626-6799 or +1 (929) 436-2866 Attendees may join the meeting any time after 5:45pm. Attendees will be muted until they are called upon for Public Comment. To make a public comment, use the “raise hand” icon on your smart device or desktop computer, or dial *9 if you are using just your telephone. Please listen carefully for the Mayor or City Clerk to address you by name (or phone number) and for the audible Zoom notification that you have been unmuted. Once you begin your public comment, your three minutes will begin.

If you would prefer to submit your public comment in writing, please email your comments to [email protected]. If you are commenting on a specific agenda item or items, please state the agenda item number(s) in the subject line of the email. All comments received via email will be provided to the City Council or Planning Commission in writing and included as part of the record of the meeting.

Notice is hereby given that Council may discuss and/or take action on any or all of the items listed on this agenda.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Cotati City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for inspection in the online Meeting Portal at www.cotaticity.gov and in the City Manager’s office located at 201 West Sierra Avenue, Cotati, California, during the City’s posted business hours.

Disabled Accommodation: Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate formats to persons with disabilities as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the Deputy City Clerk at (707) 665-3622 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.

Rules of Decorum: To avoid distraction, the following meeting etiquette shall be enforced. • Silence electronic devices, including cell phones.

Cotati City Council Packet May 13, 2025
• Audience members are advised to keep conversations to a minimum or conduct them outside the building. • Photographs or video recordings using tri-pods or other means that would be distracting are to be taken only from the designated media area. • The Presiding Officer shall request that the audience withhold expressions of support or opposition for speakers in the interest of time and to encourage the full expression of differing views. (City Council Policy 2025-02 IV.B.1.) Public Comment (Action items): Public comment on any one agenda item where the City Council will be taking some action is limited to no more than three (3) minutes per person. Action items are typically designated on the agenda title.

Public Comment (Non-Action items): Public comment on non- action agenda items shall be received during the designated portion of the agenda.

Comments shall be limited to no more than three (3) minutes for all non-action agenda items.

Waiver Warning: If you challenge decisions/direction of the City Council of the City of Cotati in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearing(s) described in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Cotati at, or prior to, the public hearing(s).

City Council meetings are conducted according to City Council Policy 2025-02: City Council Rules. This policy available for inspection in the online Meeting Portal at www.cotaticity.gov and in the City Manager’s office located at 201 West Sierra Avenue, Cotati, California, during the City’s posted business hours.

Those wishing to address the Council are asked to complete a speaker card and give it to the City Clerk. When you are called, step to the podium and state your name and address for the record. Persons wishing to address the Council are not required to identify themselves or complete a speaker card; (Gov’t. Code § 54953.3); however, this information assists the Mayor by ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Council are recognized and it assists the City Clerk in preparing the City Council meeting minutes.

1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL

2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-ACTION AGENDA ITEMS

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND NOTICE OF WAIVING OF READING OF ALL

RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES INTRODUCED AND/OR ADOPTED UNDER THIS

AGENDA (ACTION)
A. COTATI CITY COUNCIL – REGULAR MEETING – APR 22, 2025

4. ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Meeting Orientation for New Attendees/Viewers. In conformance with the Brown Act and the adopted City Council Rules, the meeting agenda includes items labeled as Action Items, where the City Council may consider the item. If the City Council considers the item, citizens will be afforded the opportunity to provide comments relevant to the item being discussed. The meeting agenda also includes a Citizens Business item, which is the designated place on the agenda where citizens have the right to say whatever they wish. However, the Brown Act prohibits the City Council from taking action or considering any item that is not on this agenda, to ensure that other members of the community who wish to provide comment are notified in advance through a properly noticed meeting agenda.

B. Measure S supports police services, a variety of recreation programs for all ages, and the maintenance of our streets, parks, and public buildings. See details on the web at cotaticity.gov.

C. Citizens interested in receiving City of Cotati community alerts via text or email are encouraged to enroll with CivicReady, by signing up on the City’s website, www.cotaticity.gov, under the “How do I” link at the top of the homepage.

D. Have you noticed a street light out, pothole, or issues in a City Park? We want to keep Cotati beautiful and running smoothly, so please let us know what needs to be fixed, by going to the City website under “How do I” and “Report a Service Request.” Cotati City Council Packet May 13, 2025
E. Like always, we love to hear from you, so please feel free to contact the City at 707-792-4600 or [email protected]. If you have a non-emergency issue after normal business hours, you can contact us at 707-792-4611 and of course if you have an emergency, please contact 9-1-1. Continue to look for updates on the City's website and social media channels available on Facebook, Instagram, and CivicReady.

5. PROCLAMATIONS
A. PROCLAIMING MAY 2025 AS ASIAN AMERICAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER

HERITAGE MONTH IN COTATI
B. PROCLAMATION DECLARING MAY 2025 AS BIKE MONTH

6. PRESENTATIONS
A. ZERO WASTE SONOMA UPDATE
It is recommended that the City Council receive a presentation about Zero Waste Sonoma (ZWS) from Leslie Lukacs, Executive Director of ZWS.

7. AGENDA REVIEW

8. CITIZEN BUSINESS AND PUBLIC COMMENT FOR CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS Any member of the public wishing to speak to the Council on any item(s) listed on the Consent Calendar or any matter(s) not listed on the agenda that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council may do so at this time. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council is not allowed to consider issues or take action on any item not listed on the agenda. Pursuant to City Council Policy 2025-02, comments of any member of the public are normally restricted to a total of three (3) minutes in length per person for matters not on the agenda and a total of three (3) minutes per person in length for any and all items on the Consent Calendar. The Mayor may extend the time limit for a reasonable time where a disability accommodation has been requested. To facilitate public comment, the timer indicator lights will display yellow when there are thirty seconds remaining, and red when time has expired.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
A. APPROVAL OF 2025 CITY OF COTATI SUMMER MOVIES IN THE PARK, FOOD

FESTIVAL, AND NATIONAL NIGHT OUT EVENTS IN LA PLAZA PARK It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the 2025 City of Cotati Summer Movies in the Park, Food Festival, and National Night Out events in La Plaza Park; authorizing the temporary street closure of La Plaza and the sales of food, goods and services, and alcohol by vendors and food trucks.

B. CONSIDERATION OF REVISED MISSION SQUARE (457) RETIREMENT PLAN

AGREEMENT
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a revision to the agreement with Mission Square for the 457 retirement plan.

C. ACCEPTANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AUDIO VISUAL SYSTEM

UPGRADE PROJECT
It is recommended that the City of Cotati City Council adopt a resolution accepting the Council Chamber Audio Visual System Upgrade Project and direct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Completion.

D. ADOPT UPDATED RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE
It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution to adopt an updated records retention schedule.

Cotati City Council Packet May 13, 2025
E. CONSIDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE

ROOFING REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT CONSULTATION FOR THE POLICE STATION, SUNFLOWER PARK RESTROOM, AND WELL 2
It is recommended the City Council of the City of Cotati approve by motion the proposal by Interactive Resources to provide roofing repair and replacement consultation professional services for the Police Station, Sunflower Park Restroom, and Well 2 and authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement for said services.

F. APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS AND ASSOCIATES TO DESIGN THE 2026 PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROJECT It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a professional services agreement with Harris and Associates to design the 2026 Pavement Preservation Project and authorizing the City Manager to execute said agreement.

G. RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 564 TO HALT THE STATE

EXCISE TAX INCREASE ON CANNABIS
It is recommended the City Council adopt a resolution supporting State Assembly Bill 564, which would halt the scheduled increase in the State excise tax on cannabis.

10. DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS (ACTION)
A. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY DESIGN

REVIEW, A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT, PARKLAND DEDICATION, AND A VESTING TENTATIVE MAP TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 178-UNIT MULTIFAMILY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT ON A 10.62-ACRE PROPERTY

LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF REDWOOD DRIVE AND STATE ROUTE (SR) 116 AND FINDING THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE

COTATI GENERAL PLAN AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND

EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15183 (PA#22-07 / APNs 046-286-017, -018, -019 & -020) It is recommended that the City Council hold a Public Hearing and adopt the accompanying Resolution, determining that the project is consistent with the General Plan Environmental Impact Report and is exempt from further environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183; and approve Preliminary Design Review, a Tree Removal Permit, and a Vesting Tentative Map (including Parkland Dedication) to permit the development of a multifamily mixed-use project that includes 134 townhome-style condominium units with up to 33 optional accessory dwelling units (ADUs), 44 affordable apartment units, 10,032 square feet of commercial space, approximately 1.08 acres of public parkland, and other ancillary improvements on a vacant 10.62-acre property located northwest of the intersection of Redwood Drive and SR-116.

B. CITY FEE SCHEDULE UPDATE
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution updating the Master Fee Schedule and charges for City services and repealing previously adopted or conflicting fees and charges for such services.

12. REGULAR AGENDA (ACTION)
A. FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 - THIRD QUARTER - FINANCIAL UPDATE Cotati City Council Packet May 13, 2025
It is recommended that the City Council receive the presentation on the un-audited financial position for the City as of the Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2024/25 and receive the investment report for the quarter ended March 31, 2025.

13. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

14. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS

15. INFORMATION RECEIVED AFTER THE AGENDA WAS POSTED

16. ADJOURNMENT
Certification of Posting of the Notice: I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Cotati and that I posted this notice on the City’s website, bulletin boards of City Hall, Veterans’ Memorial Building and the SMART Train Depot, on or before May 9, 2025. /s/ Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk

MINUTES

JOINT MEETING OF THE COTATI CITY COUNCIL AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

FORMER COTATI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
City Council Chamber, City Hall 201 W. Sierra Avenue
Tuesday, April 22, 2025
6:00 PM REGULAR MEETING

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Ford called the meeting to order at 6:00pm.

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND NOTICE OF WAIVING OF READING OF ALL

RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES INTRODUCED AND/OR ADOPTED UNDER THIS

AGENDA (ACTION)
A. COTATI CITY COUNCIL – REGULAR MEETING – MAR 25, 2025 B. COTATI CITY COUNCIL – REGULAR MEETING – APR 8, 2025
Public Comment:

Michael Ceremello
George Barich of Cotati
Laurie Alderman of Cotati
RESULT: Approve [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Laura Sparks, Councilmember
SECONDER: Susan Harvey, Councilmember
AYES: Ford, Lemus, Harvey, Sparks, Savage
NAYS: None

3. ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Meeting Orientation for New Attendees/Viewers. In conformance with the Brown Act and the adopted City Council Rules, the meeting agenda includes items labeled as Action Items, where the City Council may consider the item. If the City Council considers the item, citizens will be afforded the opportunity to provide comments relevant to the item being discussed. The meeting agenda also includes a Citizens Business item, which is the designated place on the agenda where citizens have the right to say whatever they wish. However, the Brown Act prohibits the City Council from taking action or considering any item that is not on this agenda, to ensure that other members of the community who wish to provide comment are notified in advance through a properly noticed meeting agenda. 6 of 539
Cotati City Council Minutes April 22, 2025
B. Measure S supports police services, a variety of recreation programs for all ages, and the maintenance of our streets, parks, and public buildings. See details on the web at cotaticity.gov C. Citizens interested in receiving City of Cotati community alerts via text or email are encouraged to enroll with CivicReady, by signing up on the City’s website, www.cotaticity.gov, under the “How do I” link at the top of the homepage.

D. Have you noticed a street light out, pothole, or issues in a City Park? We want to keep Cotati beautiful and running smoothly, so please let us know what needs to be fixed, by going to the City website under “How do I” and “Report a Service Request.” E. Like always, we love to hear from you, so please feel free to contact the City at 707-792-4600 or [email protected]. If you have a non-emergency issue after normal business hours, you can contact us at 707-792-4611 and of course if you have an emergency, please contact 9-1-1. Continue to look for updates on the City's website and social media channels available on Facebook, Instagram, and CivicReady.

4. APPROVAL OF FINAL AGENDA (ACTION)
No Changes.

5. CITIZEN BUSINESS AND PUBLIC COMMENT FOR CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS Any member of the public wishing to speak to the Council on any item(s) listed on the Consent Calendar or any matter(s) not listed on the agenda that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council may do so at this time. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council is not allowed to consider issues or take action on any item not listed on the agenda. Pursuant to City Council Policy 2023-01, comments of any member of the public are normally restricted to a total of three (3) minutes in length per person for matters not on the agenda and a total of three (3) minutes per person in length for any and all items on the Consent Calendar. The Mayor may extend the time limit for a reasonable time where a disability accommodation has been requested. To facilitate public comment, the Deputy Clerk will alert speakers when there are thirty seconds remaining.

Public Comment:

Laurie Alderman of Cotati
Adina Flores
Joanne Jaeger of Cotati
Cheryl
Michael Ceremello
George Barich of Cotati

6. CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
Before the Council voted on the consent calendar, Mayor Ford announced that he was recusing himself from the vote on Item 6D, due to being employed by Sonoma State University. There were two separate motions on the consent calendar, one for Items A-C, and one for Item D.

A. 2025 COTATI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EVENTS
B. APPROVAL OF 2025 CITY OF COTATI KIDS DAY EVENT IN LA PLAZA PARK C. MEASURE S ANNUAL REPORT AND LETTER FROM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24
D. APPROVAL OF A LETTER REQUESTING STATE FUNDING SUPPORT FOR THE

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM, INCLUDING SONOMA STATE 7 of 539
Cotati City Council Minutes April 22, 2025

UNIVERSITY
RESULT: Approve [5 TO 0] ITEMS A-C
MOVER: Susan Harvey, Councilmember
SECONDER: Laura Sparks, Councilmember
AYES: Harvey, Ford, Lemus, Sparks, Savage
NAYS: None
RESULT: Approve [4 TO 0] ITEM D
MOVER: Susan Harvey, Councilmember
SECONDER: Laura Sparks, Councilmember
AYES: Lemus, Harvey, Sparks, Savage
NAYS: None
RECUSED: Ford

7. DIRECTION OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.

8. REGULAR AGENDA (ACTION)
A. CONSIDERATION OF UPDATES TO THE CITY COUNCIL RULES OF CONDUCT Presentation by City Manager Damien O’Bid.

Councilmembers comment.

Public Comment:

Michael Ceremello
Laurie Alderman of Cotati
Council directed Staff to remove “or repetitious” from Section V(Q), repetitious or dilatory comments discouraged.

RESULT: Approve [5 TO 0]
MOVER: John Savage, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sylvia Lemus, Vice Mayor
AYES: Ford, Lemus, Harvey, Sparks, Savage
NAYS: None
B. POTENTIAL 2025 DISCUSSION TOPICS FOR THE SONOMA COUNTY MAYORS

AND COUNCILMEMBERS
Presentation by City Manager Damien O’Bid.

Councilmembers comment. 8 of 539
Cotati City Council Minutes April 22, 2025
No public comment.

Council decided on the following top ideas:
-Mental Health (treatment facilities, Measure O funding) -Education
-Housing/Homelessness
Other ideas discussed included mobilizing residents in our communities for volunteering (through CVNL, etc.), transportation coordination and the Library JPA.

RESULT: Approve [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Susan Harvey, Councilmember
SECONDER: Laura Sparks, Councilmember
AYES: Harvey, Ford, Lemus, Sparks, Savage
NAYS: None
C. DISCUSS CAL CITIES REQUEST FOR LETTERS OPPOSING SB 634 (PEREZ), AB 647 (GONZALES) AND SUPPORTING AB 650 (PAPAN)
Presentation by City Manager Damien O’Bid.

Councilmembers comment.

No public comment.

RESULT: Approve [5 TO 0]
MOVER: Susan Harvey, Councilmember
SECONDER: Laura Sparks, Councilmember
AYES: Harvey, Ford, Lemus, Sparks, Savage
NAYS: None

9. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
Report by City Manager Damien O’Bid.

10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Councilmembers report out on local and regional events and meetings.

11. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-ACTION AGENDA ITEMS
Public Comment:

Laurie Alderman of Cotati

12. INFORMATION RECEIVED AFTER THE AGENDA WAS POSTED

13. ADJOURNMENT
9 of 539
Cotati City Council Minutes April 22, 2025
Mayor Ford adjourned the meeting at 7:45pm.
/s/ Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
10 of 539

PROCLAMATION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI

RECOGNIZING AND SUPPORTING THE ASIAN AMERICAN AND PACIFIC

ISLANDER (AAPI) COMMUNITY IN THE CITY OF COTATI AND PROCLAIMING MAY 2025 AS AAPI HERITAGE MONTH
WHEREAS, the month of May marks the national celebration of Asian American and Pacific Islanders (AAPI) in the United States and we take this time to honor our rich history, cultural diversity, achievement and contributions; and
WHEREAS, AAPI residents have long enriched and continue to contribute to the City of Cotati’s and Sonoma County’s vitality, economic prosperity, cultural richness, and social fabric, driven by values of family, community, and the belief in the American Dream; and WHEREAS, AAPI organizing and advocacy efforts are actively growing and expanding, strengthening civic engagement and community leadership within Sonoma County (such as mitigating marginalization of our youth and recognizing the effects of climate change on the most vulnerable) and the diverse AAPI community welcomes opportunities to share stories and culture which promote pride, understanding, visibility and representation; and WHEREAS, the AAPI community continues to face systemic barriers accessing government resources, support, and representation, as well as ongoing experiences of discrimination and language barriers that can hinder full civic participation and economic mobility, and our nation’s current climate has heightened fears and vulnerabilities among AAPI residents, leading many to retreat into isolated communities for perceived safety, reinforcing the need for greater outreach, inclusion, and proactive engagement; and WHEREAS, the 50th anniversary of the end of the Vietnam War (April 30, 1975) marks a significant moment to acknowledge the forced displacement and trauma experienced by Southeast Asian refugees, including the Vietnamese, Cambodian, Laotian, and Hmong communities in Sonoma County, whose ongoing struggles remain largely unacknowledged; and WHEREAS, the City deeply values the human rights and dignity of all residents and strives to protect our residents against acts of hate; and WHEREAS, the City Councils Strategic Goals include promoting and equitable, compassionate, and health community that honors diversity as a source of strength. 11 of 539
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Cotati formally recognizes and honors the contributions of the AAPI community, will work to dispel misconceptions and educate our residents about the significant contributions of the AAPI community to support the efforts to end discrimination.

BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED, that the City will actively seek opportunities to collaborate with AAPI communities, including encouraging all elected officials in Sonoma County to attend and actively listen and engage at AAPI events, advance equity and health in our City and ensure that all City operations are inclusive and equitable.

BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the City, in recognition of the Asian American and Pacific Islander community, hereby proclaim the month of May 2025 as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month in the City of Cotati.

Approved:_____________________________
Mayor
12 of 539

PROCLAMATION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI
DECLARING THE MONTH OF MAY 2025 BIKE MONTH
WHEREAS, May is National Bike Month, promoted by the League of American Bicyclists and celebrated in communities from coast to coast since 1956, a chance to showcase the many benefits of bicycling — and encourage more people of all ages and abilities to giving biking a try; and
WHEREAS, since 2004, May Is Bike Month has been celebrated across the Sonoma County Region and events are planned throughout the month to promote and encourage people to try bicycling for some of their trips; and
WHEREAS, every day is a good day to choose riding a bike, but May is special because people want to get outside, enjoy our wonderful city in warmer weather, and enjoy Cotati’s bike lanes and trails for recreational riding, commuting, and seeing the city we call home; and WHEREAS, since a recent study found that when an individual replaces one car trip per day with a bike trip, that person reduces their carbon emissions from transportation by 67 percent, just one small change in your daily life which contributes to a healthier future for our planet and nation; and
WHEREAS, since using a bike for transportation can help improve personal health and air quality, Cotati residents should be encouraged to try an active alternative for transportation such as biking instead of a car; and
WHEREAS, celebrating May Is Bike Month is simple: go for a ride -- any ride, whether it’s a short trip for coffee or a miles long ride, for any way you choose to ride a bike is the right way to ride a bike; and
WHEREAS, the month of May is a great time to check with local cycling clubs, the Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition or our local bicycle shop to find other people with which to ride; and
WHEREAS, Thursday May 15th 2025 is Bike to Wherever Day and the City of Cotati is partnering with Sonoma Clean Power to host an Energizer Station at the Cotati Train Depot and we encourage everyone to join in a host of cycling activities, challenges, and classes throughout the month of May.
13 of 539
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Cotati declares the month of May 2025 as Bike Month in Cotati.

Approved:______________________________
Mayor
14 of 539
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: PRESENTATIONS
To: City Council
Subject: ZERO WASTE SONOMA UPDATE
Date: April 22, 2025
Written by: Damien O'Bid, City Manager
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council receive a presentation about Zero Waste Sonoma (ZWS) from Leslie Lukacs, Executive Director of ZWS.
15 of 539
5/8/2025 1
ZWS TRAINING 101
SEPTEMBER 25, 2019

LESLIE LUKACS

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
16 of 539

ZWS BACKGROUND
 ZWS is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) formed to
implement AB 939
 Established in 1992
 Governing body is a 10-member Board of Directors
 One representative from each City and the County
17 of 539

MISSION & VISION
Zero Waste Sonoma’s mission is to empower personal action in waste reduction and materials management by implementing practical solutions to protect our natural resources.

Our vision is an engaged and informed community with the shared goal of thriving in a sustainable region without waste. 18 of 539

OUTREACH AND EDUCATION
 Website
www.zerowastesonoma.gov
 Comprehensive topics for residents
and businesses
 Robust search function
 Approximately 144,000 visitors
from January 1, 2024 to
December 31, 2024
 Our most popular web page was
our e-waste disposal page, with
32,936 visitors last year
19 of 539
ZEROWASTESONOMA.GOV
20 of 539
 Events and Fairs
 Participated in 171 outreach
events in 2024
 Includes Spanish language
outreach conducted through
contractor
 Coordinates
purchase
of promotional
items

OUTREACH AND EDUCATION
21 of 539
22 of 539
 Recycling Guide (English & Spanish)
 In 2025, printed 25,000 English and
13,000 Spanish Guide
 Distributed to transfer stations,
community partners, nonprofits, tribal
organizations, local businesses, and
more
 .pdf version available on
zerowastesonoma.gov website

OUTREACH AND EDUCATION
23 of 539
 Spanish language outreach
 Call-in radio programming
(KBBF, Radio Lazer,
La Mejor)
 Targeted outreach events
 Countywide annual Latino business
visits
Spanish outreach leveraged by Soluna Outreach
Services

OUTREACH AND EDUCATION
24 of 539
 Social Media
 Facebook – 4,184 followers
 Instagram – 1,870 followers
 Twitter – 507 followers
 LinkedIn – 228 followers

OUTREACH AND EDUCATION
25 of 539

REPAIR FAIRS & FIXIT CLINICS
RFP in 2025-2026 for ongoing repair
events 26 of 539
§ Permanent HHW Facility at Central
§ Tues-Wed for qualifying businesses
§ Thurs-Sat for residents
§ HHW Collection Events
§ Every Tuesday, locations vary
§ 1-2 Saturdays per year in Sea Ranch
§ HHW Rover Pick-up Service
§ Every Wednesday by appointment
§ Reuse Program
§ “Like new” items available for reuse
to the public for free
§ Paint Reprocessing in four colors

HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
27 of 539

ELECTRONIC WASTE COLLECTION
E-Waste Programs
§ Public E-Waste Drop-Off Locations
§ Available at all 5 transfer stations
§ E-Waste Recycling Events
§ 14 events per year, locations vary
§ 10 events also have free mattress
recycling
28 of 539
CalRecycle Grant – Residential Solar Panel
Collection Events
 13 collection events
 Partner with Conservation Corps North Bay
 Test panels for reuse potential
 Habitat for Humanity ReStore
 Recycle with ERI in Fresno

SOLAR PANEL COLLECTION
29 of 539
§ New North County HHW Facility
§ 5885 Pruitt Ave, Windsor
§ In contract with COAR Design Group for
architectural and engineering design
§ Concept design phase
§ Working with Sonoma Public
Infrastructure for a construction loan
§ Possible additions
§ ZWS Offices
§ Hard-to-recycle item collection

NEW HHW FACILITY - WINDSOR
30 of 539

HHW & EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY
§ EPR Legislation
§ Co-sponsor of SB 561 the Marine
Flare Producer Responsibility Act
by Senator Blakespear
31 of 539
Jurisdiction
Inspection &
Enforcement
Commercial
Edible Food
Generators
Recycled Paper
Procurement
Compost/mulch
Procurement
Edible Food
Recovery
Program
Education &
Outreach
Waivers Contamination
Minimization
Hauler
Program
Collection
Services

SHORT-LIVED

CLIMATE

POLLUTANTS LAW
(SB 1383)

IN ACTION

JURISDICTION

REQUIREMENTS
32 of 539
SB 1383 COMPLIANCE
 Support Haulers
 Investigate Complaints
 Contract with Environmental Health
 Inspections
 Work with Jurisdictions
 Notices of Violation
 Citations
 Maintain Implementation Record
33 of 539
Compost Hubs
• Free compost for residents, yearround
• More access for residents and
more resilient than events
• Located adjacent to non-profit
farms or community/teaching gardens
• Purple pins are hubs that opened in 2024
• Veronda Faletti Ranch - First
weekend of month, 10 am –12 pm or by appt.
• Black pins are hubs that are
likely to open 2025 34 of 539
20 35 of 539

PROPOSED SONOMA COUNTY AIRPORT ORGANICS FACILITY
 Currently County-led project
 Completed feasibility study Dec 2022
 Hired SCS Engineers Jan 2024 for
environmental permitting, 30% design
 On top of closed landfill; county-owned
 Process up to 65,000 TPY of organics,
covered aerated static pile (CASP)
 Solar, energy-efficient equipment, green
building materials, etc.
 ZWS to lead RFP to find composter 36 of 539

CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION
 County of Sonoma Climate Resiliency grant
 Develop Model CD&D Ordinance
 Fund Green Halo Software for 3 years
 Collaboration with Permit Sonoma
 Launched Green Halo May 4th
 Received Green Halo Training
 Healdsburg, Windsor, Santa Rosa
 Next Steps
 Transition Cotati to use Green Halo
 Present model ordinance to City Council
37 of 539
NORTH BAY ZERO WASTE WEEK 2024
• 50+ events in 2024 in Sonoma,
Marin, and Napa
• 36 community partners
• All free and open to the public
• Estimated 2500 participants
38 of 539
5/8/2025 24
QUESTIONS?
THANK YOU!
39 of 539
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: APPROVAL OF 2025 CITY OF COTATI SUMMER MOVIES IN

THE PARK, FOOD FESTIVAL, AND NATIONAL NIGHT OUT
EVENTS IN LA PLAZA PARK.

Date: May 13, 2025
Written by: Ashley Wilson, Recreation Manager
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the 2025 City of Cotati Summer Movies in the Park, Food Festival, and National Night Out events in La Plaza Park; authorizing the temporary street closure of La Plaza and the sales of food, goods and services, and alcohol by vendors and food trucks.

Background
With the success of our National Night Out event and Summer Movies in the Park events in the past several years and a goal to bring more recreational and community-oriented opportunities to Cotati, if authorized by the City Council, the City will continue to bring movies in the park throughout the summer. Additionally, the food festival had a successful first year last summer and will continue it this year.

National Night Out is an annual community-building campaign that promotes police-community partnerships and neighborhood camaraderie to make our neighborhoods safer, better places to live. The National Night Out program culminates annually on the first Tuesday of August.

Neighbors participate across thousands of communities from all 50 states, United States territories, Canadian cities, and military bases worldwide. The Recreation and Police Departments will work together to continue this event in Cotati to build community engagement and trust.

Analysis/Discussion
Below is a summary of the events. Request includes the following: 1) exclusive use of La Plaza 40 of 539
Park; 2) closure of public streets, including parking spaces; 3) sales of food and other items by vendors and food trucks and tickets to ride a jump house and potentially other attractions; 4) alcohol sales provided by the Cotati Chamber of Commerce or other nonprofit organization; 5) amplified entertainment as well as dogs in the park.

Event Attendance Dates/Times (including set-up)
Movies in the Park 200 Friday, June 13
4:00 pm – 11:00 pm
Movies in the Park/ 600 Tuesday, August 5
National Night Out 3:00pm – 11:00pm
Movies in the Park/ 250 Saturday, September 20
Grub in the Hub Food Fest 12:00 pm – 11:00 pm
California Vehicle Code Section 21101 (e) authorizes the temporary closing of any street for celebrations, parades, local events and other purposes when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing. In these instances, the public street would be heavily used for food vendors and vehicles, so closure is in the best interest of public safety. The Police Department will notify the appropriate public and emergency response agencies of the closures. To maximize the safety of those attending, the Public Works Department would need to temporarily close La Plaza between West Sierra Avenue and West Cotati Avenue.

National Night Out is an annual national event that brings communities and public agencies together. On August 5th, a City funded (free to attendees) dinner would be served beginning at 6:00pm in La Plaza Park. The Police Department will propose the costs associated with this event in the 2025/26 budget. During and following dinner, the community will have time to engage on a casual level with City Staff, including Police, Recreation, and other departments.

On September 20th, the City will offer their 2nd Grub in the Hub Food Festival prior to the Movie in the Park. With the success of the last years’ Food Festival prior to the September Movie in the Park, the City will continue to offer this multi-generational and free to attend event.

A fee for vendor entries will be assessed to participants of the food festival.

Beginning at sunset on June 13th, August 5th, and September 20th, a movie will be projected on a screen near the bandstand, free to the public. The event will end after the movie with cleanup and staff ensuring a safe exit from the park. Amplified entertainment will cease no later than 11 pm.

Financial Considerations
The event provides increased opportunities to promote community engagement and has the potential to bring visitors to the City. Financial considerations for the City are approximately 41 of 539
$7,800 combined staff and supply costs for Fiscal Year 2024/25 and $31,100 for Fiscal Year 2025/26 which are included within FY 24/25 budget and proposed FY 25/26 budgets. The staff costs are comprised of Recreation staff ($18,080), Police staff ($5,425), and Public Works staff ($2,232). Additionally, supplies and movie rights are estimated at $13,055. Below is a summary of the costs of the event.

Movie Event Expense
Movies in the Park Movies in the Park/
National Night Out
Movies in the Park/
Grub in the Hub
13-Jun 5-Aug 20-Sep
Staff Time * prep work & day of events
Recreation = Total 160 Hours $ 6,030 $ 6,030 $ 6,030
Public Works = Total 12 Hours 744 744 744
Police Department = Total 25 Hours - 5,425 -
Total Staff Time Costs $ 6,774 $ 12,199 $ 6,774
Materials and Supplies
Dinner for NNO $ - $ 8,000 $ -
Rights to show movies 435 435 435
Movies, snacks, equipment 500 - -
Bands for Grub in the Hub - - 3,250
Total Other Expenses $ 935 $ 8,435 $ 3,685
Total Estimated Expenses $ 7,709 $ 20,634 $ 10,459
Total Fiscal Year 2024/25 $ 7,709
Total Fiscal Year 2025/26 $ 31,093
Offsetting Estimated Revenues $ 1,000
Environmental Issues
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378.
42 of 539
RESOLUTION NO. (XX)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI
APPROVING THE 2025 CITY OF COTATI SUMMER MOVIES IN THE PARK, FOOD FESTIVAL, AND NATIONAL NIGHT OUT EVENTS IN LA PLAZA PARK.

WHEREAS, the City of Cotati desires to provide the community National Night Out, Movies in the Park, and Food Festival events, which are a popular on-going program; and WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 21101(e) authorizes temporary street closures where certain conditions exist; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to temporarily close certain streets, and conform to certain conditions as described in “Exhibit A,” attached hereto, to facilitate this event; and WHEREAS, the closure is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion or portions of the street(s) during the temporary closing; and WHEREAS, the Chief of Police of the City of Cotati will arrange for temporary street closure and traffic re-routing, which will minimize the traffic hazard conditions and allow for orderly movement of traffic; and
WHEREAS, the Chief of Police will contact the Rancho Adobe Fire Protection District, ambulance service providers, bus service providers, and others who may need ingress, egress, or the ability to traverse the affected area and will reasonably provide for their needs; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this event is part of a comprehensive community development strategy by the City of Cotati in that it increases visitation to the City, promotes the Cotati community; provides opportunity for police-community partnerships; and WHEREAS, the action of approving Movies in the Park, Car Show, and National Night Out events does not constitute a project as defined by California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378; therefore, no further environmental review is required.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cotati as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. The closure of La Plaza Park for use for the Movies in the Park, Food Festival, and National Night Out events on Friday, June 13th, 2025, between 4:00pm and 11:00pm, Tuesday, August 5th , 2025 between 3:00pm and 11:00pm, and Saturday, September 20th, 2025 between 12:00pm and 11:00pm, are hereby approved, to include amplified entertainment, food, good, and alcohol sales, and other activities as described in the accompanying staff report.

3. The temporary closure of portions of La Plaza Street during the above dates and times are hereby approved.
43 of 539

4. The use of staff time and City Funds for the Movies in the Park, Food Festival, and National Night Out events, as further described in the accompanying staff report, is hereby approved.

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cotati held on May 13, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

MOVIES IN THE PARK, FOOD FESTIVAL, AND NATIONAL NIGHT OUT EVENTS

1. The City of Cotati shall ensure the public facilities (park, parking spaces and streets) are cleaned completely and returned to pre-event conditions within 48 hours of each event.

2. The event shall be carried out as described in the written descriptions submitted by the applicant, approved by the City Council, and in compliance with these Conditions of Approval.

3. The City of Cotati shall arrange for trash, recycling, and compost bins to be delivered and collected.

4. The City of Cotati is granted exclusive use of La Plaza Park, including closure of all public streets and parking spaces necessary to accommodate the events, on Friday, June 13th, 2025, between 4:00pm and 11:00pm, Tuesday, August 5
th
, 2025, between 3:00pm and 11:00pm,
and Saturday, September 20
th
, 2025, between 12:00pm and 11:00pm. This approval includes amplified live entertainment and food, goods, and alcoholic drink sales.

5. The City of Cotati shall adhere to the following approved event area:
o La Plaza Park
o La Plaza from West Sierra Avenue to West Cotati Avenue 45 of 539
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF REVISED MISSION SQUARE (457)

RETIREMENT PLAN AGREEMENT
Date: May 13, 2025
Written by: Damien O'Bid, City Manager
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a revision to the agreement with Mission Square for the 457 retirement plan.

Background
The City currently offers employees a 457 retirement plan through Mission Square. The City is the fiduciary and administrator of the plan and Mission Square is the record keeper for the plan.

The proposed plan renewal agreement is attached.

Analysis/Discussion
With more assets in the Mission Square 457 retirement plan, staff have been able to renegotiate and significantly lower the cost of the plan for the employees. Additionally, staff are proposing to change the mix of mutual funds from largely managed proprietary funds to index funds, as well as expanding the types of funds into different asset classes. The net result for the employees will be much lower fees and a broader mix of fund options, which will result in better returns on their investments over time and greater investment options. There will be no reduction in services with these changes. In addition to the services offered by Mission Square, there will be additional services offered through a 3-21 Investment Advisor that the City has been working with during negotiations with Mission Square. The goal of continuing to work with the investment advisor is to better assist employees with investment advisory services and education.

If approved by the City Council, the plan changes would be put in place and the mutual funds transitioned in July. Staff is proposing to stay with Mission Square, but employees will still be receiving notices of the fund changes, likely in June. Mission Square will automatically move 46 of 539
the existing funds for each employee into new funds that have the same or a very similar asset/risk profiles. The new fund line up is attached.

The goal, post transition, is to ensure that everyone has the information they need to make informed choices about their investments, including setting up recurring opportunities for employee education and advisory services. Moving forward, the plan will also be actively monitored through an internal investment committee.

Financial Considerations
The City does not fund the administration of the 457 plan, these costs are funded by plan fees charged to all plan participants. Currently, the plan fees are 0.8% (80 basis points) for record keeping and an average of 0.41% (41 basis points) for management fees (aka Fund Expense Ratio) based on the current mutual fund mix (total of 1.21%). The current mutual funds are primarily managed proprietary funds, which are high cost and historically do not outperform similar passive index funds.

With the change to passive index funds, and a renegotiated agreement, the costs will drop substantially. The new record-keeping fee will be 0.15% (15 basis points) with an average management fee of 0.12% (12 basis points), based on the new fund mix (total of 27 basis points).

Additionally, to fund the third party 3-21 fiduciary, the agreement collects a flat fee of $10,000 per year.

Environmental Issues
Where it can be determined with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA review.

This general rule can be applied to activities which could be subject to the CEQA process, but which logic dictates should not be subject to CEQA review. Therefore, based on the information provided above, the proposed resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 14.03.021 of the CEQA Guidelines in that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant impact on the environment.
47 of 539

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
for
City of Cotati
Type: 457
Account #: 302418
48 of 539
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 1 of 1

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Administrative Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is made as of this day, (please enter date) ____________________________________, (herein referred to as the "Inception Date"), between the International City Management Association Retirement Corporation doing business as MissionSquare Retirement (“MissionSquare”), a nonprofit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and the City of Cotati (“Employer”), an Municipality organized and existing under the laws of the State of California with an office at 201 West Sierra Avenue, Cotati, California 94931.

RECITALS
Employer acts as public plan sponsor of a retirement plan (“Plan”), and in that capacity, has responsibility to obtain administrative services and investment alternatives for the Plan;
VantageTrust is a group trust established and maintained in accordance with New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated section 391:1 and Internal Revenue Service Revenue Ruling 81-100, 1981-1 C.B. 326, which provides for the commingled investment of retirement funds;
MissionSquare, or its wholly owned subsidiary, acts as investment adviser to VantageTrust Company, LLC, the Trustee of VantageTrust; MissionSquare has designed, and VantageTrust Company offers, a series of separate funds (the “Funds”) for the investment of plan assets as referenced in the Funds’ principal disclosure documents, the Disclosure Memorandum and the Fact Sheets (together, “MissionSquare Disclosures”); and MissionSquare provides a range of services to public employers for the operation of employee retirement plans including, but not limited to, communications concerning investment alternatives, account maintenance, account recordkeeping, investment and tax reporting, transaction processing, and benefit disbursement.

49 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 2 of 1

AGREEMENTS

1. Appointment of MissionSquare
Employer hereby appoints MissionSquare as administrator of the Plan to perform all nondiscretionary functions necessary for the administration of the Plan. The functions to be performed by MissionSquare shall be those set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

2. Adoption of VantageTrust
Employer has adopted the Declaration of Trust of VantageTrust Company and agrees to the commingled investment of assets of the Plan within VantageTrust.

Employer agrees that the investment, management, and distribution of amounts deposited in VantageTrust shall be subject to the Declaration of Trust, as it may be amended from time to time and shall also be subject to terms and conditions set forth in disclosure documents (such as the MissionSquare Disclosures or Employer Bulletins) as those terms and conditions may be adjusted from time to time.

3. Employer Duty to Furnish Information
Employer agrees to furnish to MissionSquare on a timely basis such information as is necessary for MissionSquare to carry out its responsibilities as Administrator of the Plan, including information needed to allocate individual participant accounts to Funds in the Plan, and information as to the employment status of participants, and participant ages, addresses, and other identifying information (including tax identification numbers). Employer also agrees that it will notify MissionSquare in a timely manner regarding changes in staff as it relates to various roles. Such notification is to be completed through the plan sponsor website. MissionSquare shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy of any information that is furnished to it by a responsible official of the Employer or any information relating to an individual participant or beneficiary that is furnished by such participant or beneficiary, and MissionSquare shall not be responsible for any error arising from its reliance on such information. MissionSquare will provide reports and account information to the Employer through the plan sponsor website.

Employer is required to send in contributions through the plan sponsor website.

Alternative electronic methods may be allowed but must be approved by MissionSquare for use. Contributions may not be sent through paper submittal documents.

To the extent Employer selects third-party investment options that do not have profile information provided to MissionSquare through MissionSquare’s 50 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 3 of 1
electronic data feeds from external sources (such as Morningstar) or the thirdparty investment option providers, the Employer is responsible for providing to MissionSquare timely investment option updates for disclosure to Plan participants. Such updates may be provided to MissionSquare through the Employer’s investment consultant or other designated representative.

4. MissionSquare Representations and Warranties
MissionSquare represents and warrants to Employer that:
(a) MissionSquare is a non-profit corporation with full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations under this Agreement. The ability of MissionSquare, or its wholly owned subsidiary, to serve as investment adviser to VantageTrust Company is dependent upon the continued
willingness of VantageTrust Company for MissionSquare, or its wholly owned subsidiary, to serve in that capacity.
(b) MissionSquare is an investment adviser registered as such with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.
(c) MissionSquare shall maintain and administer the Plan in accordance with the requirements for eligible deferred
compensation plans under Section 457 of the Internal Revenue Code and other applicable federal law; provided, however, that MissionSquare shall not be responsible for the eligible status of the Plan in the event that the Employer directs MissionSquare to administer the Plan or disburse assets in a manner inconsistent with the requirements of Section 457 or otherwise causes the Plan not to be carried out in accordance with its terms. Further, in the event that the Employer uses its own customized plan document, MissionSquare shall not be responsible for the eligible status of the Plan to the extent affected by terms in the Employer’s plan document that differ from those in MissionSquare’s model plan document. MissionSquare shall not be responsible for monitoring state or local law applicable to retirement plans or for administering the Plan in compliance with local or state requirements regarding plan administration unless Employer notifies MissionSquare of any such local or state requirements.

5. Employer Representations and Warranties
Employer represents and warrants to MissionSquare that:
51 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 4 of 1
(a) Employer is organized in the form and manner recited in the opening paragraph of this Agreement with full power and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement and to act for the Plan and participants in the manner contemplated in this Agreement. Execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement will not conflict with any law, rule, regulation or contract by which the Employer is bound or to which it is a party.
(b) Employer understands and agrees that MissionSquare’s sole function under this Agreement is to act as recordkeeper and to provide administrative, investment or other services at the direction of Plan participants, the Employer, its agents or designees in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Under the terms of this Agreement, MissionSquare does not render investment advice, is neither the “Plan Administrator” nor “Plan Sponsor” as those terms are defined under applicable federal, state, or local law, and does not provide legal, tax or accounting advice with respect to the creation, adoption or operation of the Plan and its related trust. MissionSquare does not perform any service under this Agreement that might cause MissionSquare to be treated as a “fiduciary” of the Plan under applicable law, except, and only, to the extent that MissionSquare provides investment advisory services to individual participants enrolled in Guided Pathways Advisory Services.
(c) Employer acknowledges and agrees that MissionSquare does not assume any responsibility with respect to the selection or retention of the Plan’s investment options. Employer shall have exclusive responsibility for the Plan’s investment options, including the selection of the applicable share class.
(d) Employer acknowledges that certain such services to be performed by MissionSquare under this Agreement may be
performed by an affiliate or agent of MissionSquare pursuant to one or more other contractual arrangements or relationships, and that MissionSquare reserves the right to change vendors with which it has contracted to provide services in connection with this Agreement without prior notice to Employer.
(e) Employer approves the use of its Plan in MissionSquare external media, publications and materials. Examples include press releases announcements and inclusion of the general plan information in request for proposal responses.
52 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 5 of 1

6. Participation in Certain Proceedings
The Employer hereby authorizes MissionSquare to act as agent, to appear on its behalf, and to join the Employer as a necessary party in all legal proceedings involving the garnishment of benefits or the transfer of benefits pursuant to the divorce or separation of participants in the Plan. Unless Employer notifies MissionSquare otherwise, Employer consents to the disbursement by MissionSquare of benefits that have been garnished or transferred to a former spouse, current spouse, or child pursuant to a domestic relations order or child support order.

7. Compensation and Payment
(a) Participant Fees. Plan participant accounts shall be assessed an asset-based fee to cover the costs of record-keeping and other services provided by MissionSquare, and other costs associated with the Plans as directed by the Employer. The Employer shall work with MissionSquare to determine the appropriate amount of the gross asset-based fee to be charged to participant accounts, which may be increased or decreased from time to time at the direction of the Employer. At the inception of this Agreement the participant fee shall be 0.15%.
(b) Revenue Requirement. MissionSquare shall receive total annual aggregate revenue of 0.15% of Plan assets under MissionSquare’s administration for providing recordkeeping and other services to the Plans. Such revenue shall be deducted by MissionSquare from amounts collected through the application of the asset-based fee described in section 7(a) prior to allocation of any participant level asset-based fees to the Administrative Allowance Account (an unallocated plan account, which may also be known as a “plan level expense account”) described is section 7(c) below. (c) Administrative Allowance Account. Amounts collected through the application of the asset-based fee described in section 7(a) above in excess of the Revenue Requirement specified in subsection 7(b) above, if any, shall be held in an Administrative Allowance Account for each Plan (that is maintained as a Plan asset by MissionSquare). Employer understands that the Plan
administrative allowance is to be used only to pay for reasonable plan administrative expenses of the Plan or allocated to Plan participants at the instruction of the Employer.
53 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 6 of 1
Employer directs MissionSquare to pay the Plan’s consultant fee as follows:

Fee
Amount
$10,000 ($2,500 per quarter) per year, to be
invoiced quarterly and charged by plan pro
rata, per participants in plan 302418.

Payee Fiduciary Experts
Frequency Quarterly, in arrears, to be paid within 30
days after the end of the quarter.

The payment will be made only from the above-referenced Plan’s Administrative Allowance Account. Should the amount in the Plan’s Administrative Allowance Account be insufficient to cover the fee due, MissionSquare will seek written instruction from the Plan or Plan Sponsor as to the amount to pay the consultant. For processing purposes, the consultant may submit an invoice to MissionSquare for payment of the fee; provided, however, that MissionSquare will pay the consultant only as set forth above. The consultant shall have no authority to calculate the fee amount, change the frequency of the payment, or change the payee.

Employer acknowledges and agrees that, for the purposes of these payments, MissionSquare is acting as the agent of the Plan.

Employer also acknowledges that in following its direction MissionSquare is not exercising any discretion regarding whether the above fee payment is an appropriate or reasonable use of Plan funds. Accordingly, Employer agrees to hold MissionSquare harmless from adverse consequences that may result from making such payments.
(d) Revenue Received from Investment Options. Neither
MissionSquare nor the Employer shall retain recordkeeping revenue received directly from investment options made available under the Plan. MissionSquare shall be compensated from fees collected from participant accounts through the application of the asset-based fee described in section 7(a) above. In the event that any Plan investment options do generate revenue from plan investments, MissionSquare shall, as directed by the Employer, credit any and all revenue back to those participant accounts invested in the option in question.
54 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 7 of 1
(e) Compensation for Management Services to VantageTrust Company, Compensation for Advisory and other Services to the MissionSquare Funds Class M and Payments from ThirdParty Investment Options. Employer acknowledges that MissionSquare, or its wholly owned subsidiary, receives fees from VantageTrust Company for investment advisory services and plan and participant services furnished to VantageTrust
Company. Employer further acknowledges that MissionSquare, including certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, receives compensation for advisory and other services furnished to the MissionSquare Funds Class M, which serve as the underlying portfolios of a number of Funds offered through VantageTrust. For a MissionSquare Fund Class R that invests substantially all of its assets in a third-party mutual fund not affiliated with MissionSquare, MissionSquare or its wholly owned subsidiary receives payments from the third-party mutual fund families or their service providers in the form of 12b-1 fees, service fees, compensation for sub-accounting and other services provided based on assets in the underlying third-party mutual fund. These fees are described in the MissionSquare Disclosures and MissionSquare’s fee disclosure statement. In addition, to the extent that third party investment options are included in the investment line-up for the Plan, MissionSquare receives administrative fees from its third-party settlement and clearing agent for providing administrative and other services based on assets invested in third-party investment options; such administrative fees come from payments made by third-party investment options to the settlement and clearing agent. (f) Redemption Fees. Redemption fees imposed by outside investment options in which Plan assets are invested are collected and paid to the investment option by MissionSquare.

MissionSquare remits 100% of redemption fees back to the specific investment option to which redemption fees apply. These redemption fees and the individual investment option’s policy with respect to redemption fees are specified in the prospectus or other disclosure documents for the individual investment option and referenced in the MissionSquare Disclosures.
(g) Payment Procedures. All payments to MissionSquare pursuant to this Section 7 shall be made from Plan assets held by VantageTrust or received from third-party investment options or their service providers in connection with Plan assets invested in such thirdparty investment options, to the extent not paid by the Employer. 55 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 8 of 1
The amount of Plan assets administered by MissionSquare shall be adjusted as required to reflect any such payments as are made from the Plan. In the event that the Employer agrees to pay amounts owed pursuant to this Section 7 directly, any amounts unpaid and outstanding after 30 days of invoice to the Employer shall be withdrawn from Plan assets.

The compensation and payment set forth in this Section 7 are contingent upon the Employer’s using MissionSquare’s plan sponsor website for contribution processing and submitting contribution funds by ACH or wire transfer on a consistent basis over the term of this Agreement. The compensation in this Section 7 is also based on the assets of the Plan being invested in R10 shares of MissionSquare PLUS Fund and the Employer offering the MissionSquare PLUS Fund as the sole stable value option.

The compensation and payment in this Section 7 will take effect in the calendar quarter following receipt at a Delivery Address (defined below the signature line) of one fully executed copy of this Administrative Services Agreement based upon the following schedule:
• Agreement received by February 20 – Effective April
• Agreement received by May 20 – Effective July
• Agreement received by August 20 – Effective October
• Agreement received by November 20 – Effective January Employer further acknowledges and agrees that compensation and payment under this Agreement shall be subject to re-negotiation in the event that the Employer (a) chooses to implement additional mutual funds that neither (i) trade via NSCC nor (ii) meet MissionSquare’s daily trading operational guidelines or (b) chooses to implement investment options that are not mutual funds.

Employer further acknowledges and agrees that compensation and payment under this Agreement shall be subject to re-negotiation in the event that the Employer (a) chooses to implement additional mutual funds that neither (i) trade via NSCC nor (ii) meet MissionSquare’s daily trading operational guidelines or (b) chooses to implement investment options that are not mutual funds.

8. Indemnification
MissionSquare shall not be responsible for any acts or omissions of any person with respect to the Plan or its related trust, other than MissionSquare in connection with the administration or operation of the Plan. Employer shall indemnify MissionSquare against, and hold MissionSquare harmless from, any and all loss, damage, penalty, liability, cost, and expense, including without 56 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 9 of 1
limitation, reasonable attorney’s fees, that may be incurred by, imposed upon, or asserted against MissionSquare by reason of any claim, regulatory proceeding, or litigation arising from any act done or omitted to be done by any individual or person with respect to the Plan or its related trust, excepting only any and all loss, damage, penalty, liability, cost or expense resulting from MissionSquare’s negligence, bad faith, or willful misconduct.

9. Term
This Agreement shall be in effect and commence on the date all parties have signed and executed this Agreement (“Inception Date”). The term of this Agreement will commence on the Inception Date and extend five (5) years from that date. This Agreement will be renewed automatically for each succeeding year unless written notice of termination is provided by either party to the other no less than 60 days before the end of such Agreement year. The Employer understands and acknowledges that, in the event the Employer terminates this Agreement (or replaces the MissionSquare PLUS Fund of VantageTrust as an investment option in its investment line-up), MissionSquare retains full discretion to release Plan assets invested in the MissionSquare PLUS Fund in an orderly manner over a period of up to 12 months from the date MissionSquare receives written notification from the Employer that it has made a final and binding selection of a replacement for MissionSquare as administrator of the Plan (or a replacement investment option for the MissionSquare PLUS Fund).

10. Amendments and Adjustments
(a) This Agreement may be amended by written instrument signed by the parties.
(b) MissionSquare may modify this Agreement by providing 60 days’ advance written notice to the Employer prior to the effective date of such proposed modification. Such modification shall become effective unless, within the 60-day notice period, the Employer notifies MissionSquare in writing that it objects to such modification.
(c) The parties agree that enhancements may be made to administrative services under this Agreement. The Employer will be notified of enhancements or reduction in fees through electronic messages or special mailings.

11. Notices
Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, all notices required to be delivered under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered, 57 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 10 of 1
mailed, e-mailed or faxed to the location of the relevant party set forth below or to such other address or to the attention of such other persons as such party may hereafter specify by notice to the other party.

MissionSquare: Legal Department, MissionSquare, 777 North Capitol Street, N.E., Suite 600, Washington, D.C., 20002-4240 Facsimile; (202) 962-4601
Employer: at the office set forth in the first paragraph hereof, or to any other address, facsimile number or e-mail address designated by the Employer to receive the same by written notice similarly given.

Each such notice, request or other communication shall be effective: (i) if given by facsimile, when transmitted to the applicable facsimile number and there is appropriate confirmation of receipt; (ii) if given by mail or e-mail, upon transmission to the designated address with no indication that such address is invalid or incorrect; or (iii) if given by any other means, when actually delivered at the aforesaid address.

12. Complete Agreement
This Agreement shall constitute the complete and full understanding and sole agreement between MissionSquare and Employer relating to the object of this Agreement and correctly sets forth the complete rights, duties and obligations of each party to the other as of its date. This Agreement supersedes all written and oral agreements, communications or negotiations among the parties. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations or representations, verbal or otherwise, not expressly set forth in this Agreement are of no force and effect.

13. Titles
The headings of Sections of this Agreement and the headings for each of the attached Exhibits are for convenience only and do not define or limit the contents thereof.

14. Incorporation of Exhibits
All Exhibits (and any subsequent amendments thereto), attached hereto, and referenced herein, are hereby incorporated within this Agreement as if set forth fully herein.
58 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 11 of 1

15. Governing Law
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, applicable to contracts made in that jurisdiction without reference to its conflicts of laws provisions.

In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto certify that they have read and understand this Agreement and all Exhibits attached hereto and have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the Inception Date first above written.

CITY OF COTATI
By ____________________________________________
Signature/Date
By ____________________________________________
Name and Title (Please Print)

THE INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT

ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT CORPORATION
doing business as MISSIONSQUARE

RETIREMENT
By ___________________________________________
Erica McFarquhar
Assistant Secretary
[An execution copy will be provided via DocuSign]
59 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 12 of 1
Exhibit A
Administrative Services
The administrative services to be performed by MissionSquare under this Agreement shall be as follows:
(a) Employer will enroll employees through the plan sponsor website. (b) Establishment of participant accounts for each employee participating in the Plan for whom MissionSquare receives appropriate enrollment instructions. MissionSquare is not responsible for determining if such Plan participants are eligible under the terms of the Plan.
(c) Allocation in accordance with participant directions received in good order of individual participant accounts to investment options offered under the Plan.
(d) Maintenance of individual accounts for participants reflecting amounts deferred, income, gain or loss credited, and amounts distributed as benefits.
(e) Maintenance of records for all participants for whom participant accounts have been established. These files shall include enrollment instructions (provided to MissionSquare through the participant website or the plan sponsor website), beneficiary designation instructions and all other documents concerning each participant's account.
(f) Provision of periodic reports to the Employer through the plan sponsor website. Participants will have access to account information through Participant Services, Voice Response System, the participant website, and text access, and through quarterly statements that can be delivered electronically through the participant website or by postal service. (g) Communication to participants of information regarding their rights and elections under the Plan.
(h) Making available Participant Services Representatives through a toll-free telephone number from 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (excluding holidays and days on which the securities markets or MissionSquare are closed for business (including emergency closings)), to assist participants.
(i) Making available access to MissionSquare’s website, to allow participants to access certain account information and initiate certain plan transactions at any time. The participant website is normally available 24 hours a day, seven days a week except during scheduled maintenance periods designed to ensure high-quality performance. 60 of 539
Plan number 302418
MissionSquare Retirement Agreement 13 of 1
(j) Maintaining the security and confidentiality of client information through a system of controls including but not limited to, as appropriate:
restricting plan and participant information only to those who need it to provide services, software and hardware security, access controls, data back-up and storage procedures, non-disclosure agreements, security incident response procedures, and audit reviews.
(k) Making available access to MissionSquare’s plan sponsor web site to allow plan sponsors to access certain plan information and initiate plan transactions such as enrolling participants and managing contributions at any time. The plan sponsor web site is normally available 24 hours a day, seven days a week except during scheduled maintenance periods designed to ensure high-quality performance.
(l) Distribution of benefits as agent for the Employer in accordance with terms of the Plan. Participants who have separated from service can request distributions through the participant website or via form. (m)MissionSquare is authorized by the Employer to (a) determine whether a domestic relations order is an acceptable qualified domestic relations order under the terms of the Plan and (b) establish a separate account record for the alternate payee and provide for the investment and distribution of assets held thereunder.
(n) Loans may be made available on the terms specified in the Loan Guidelines, if loans are adopted by the Employer. Participants can request loans through the participant website.
(o) Guided Pathways Advisory Services – MissionSquare’s participant advice service, “Fund Advice”, may be made available through a third-party vendor on the terms specified on MissionSquare’s website. (p) MissionSquare is authorized by the Employer to establish an unallocated plan level expense account to function as the Administrative Allowance account, to be invested as Employer directs.
(q) MissionSquare will determine appropriate delivery method (electronic and/or print) for plan sponsor/participant communications and education based on a number of factors (audience, effectiveness, etc.) 61 of 539
Ticker Investment Name
VCMDX Vanguard Commodity Strategy Admiral
VEMAX Vanguard Emerging Mkts Stock Idx Adm
VTMGX Vanguard Developed Markets Index Admiral
VFWAX Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Admiral
FBIIX Fidelity International Bond Index
VWEAX Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Adm
VIPSX Vanguard Inflation-Protected Secs Inv
VBTLX Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Adm
VBILX Vanguard Interm-Term Bond Index Adm
VCPAX Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Admiral
VFIAX Vanguard 500 Index Admiral
VTSAX Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
VIGAX Vanguard Growth Index Admiral
VVIAX Vanguard Value Index Adm
VLTCX Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bd Idx Adm
VIMAX Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
VMGMX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
VBIAX Vanguard Balanced Index Adm
FFNOX Fidelity Multi-Asset Index
VWIAX Vanguard Wellesley® Income Admiral™
VUSXX Vanguard Treasury Money Market Investor
VMSAX Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond Adm
VGSLX Vanguard Real Estate Index Admiral
VBIRX Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Adm
VSMAX Vanguard Small Cap Index Admiral Shares
0XLRR MissionSquare PLUS Fund R10
VTTVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund
VTHRX Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
VTTHX Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund
VFORX Vanguard Target Retirement 2040 Fund
VTIVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund
VFIFX Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Fund
VFFVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund
VTTSX Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund
VLXVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund
VSVNX Vanguard Target Retirement 2070 Fund
VTINX Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund
VITAX Vanguard Information Technology Idx Adm
62 of 539
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: ACCEPTANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AUDIO

VISUAL SYSTEM UPGRADE PROJECT
Date: May 13, 2025
Written by: Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City of Cotati City Council adopt a resolution accepting the Council Chamber Audio Visual System Upgrade Project and direct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Completion.

Background
In 2024, the City Council directed staff to work on upgrades to the current Audio-Visual Systems in the Council Chamber, to improve reliability. To accomplish this, the City contracted with the Shallack Collaborative to design a system that meets the City’s needs.

Analysis/Discussion
On September 24, 2024, City Council awarded the construction contract for the project to Coda Technology Group. Work was completed offsite in October and November, and on-site work began on December 11, 2024, after the last Council meeting of the year. The project was substantially completed on January 10, 2025, and staff began using the new system at the first Council meeting of the year on January 14, 2025. Over the next few months, staff identified minor bug fixes and changes. City staff have determined that the work has been completed in accordance with the contract documents and recommend it for acceptance by the City Council.

Financial Considerations
The total approved budget amount for this project was $306,000. The project came within this budget, and the total expenses were $300,291. Unspent Project funds are to be returned to the unappropriated General Fund.
63 of 539
Environmental Issues
This action was found to qualify for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption under CEQA Section 15301, in that the project consisted of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of the existing or former use.
64 of 539
RESOLUTION NO. (XX)

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF COTATI CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUDIO VISUAL SYSTEMS UPGRADE PROJECT

AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD THE NOTICE OF

COMPLETION
WHEREAS, the City Council Chambers Audio Visual Systems Upgrade Project (Project) was presented to Council by City Staff on March 12, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Project consisted of upgrading aging pieces of the City’s audio-visual equipment in the Council Chambers, which was originally installed in 2014, to make improvements in the system’s reliability; and
WHEREAS, On September 24, 2024, City Council awarded the Construction contract for the project and work began in the Council Chambers on December 11, 2024; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2025, the work was substantially completed, with City Staff working with the contractor to fix minor bugs discovered by using the system over the next few months;
WHEREAS, the City Manager has determined the work has been completed in accordance with the contract documents and recommends it for acceptance by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Project’s total approved budget amount was $306,000; and WHEREAS, the Project was completed under budget ($300,291) and unspent funds are to be returned to the unappropriated General Fund balance; and WHEREAS, the Project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption under CEQA Section 15301, in that the Project consisted of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of the existing or former use.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Cotati City Council hereby takes the following actions:

1. Determines the recitals stated above are true and correct; and

2. Accepts the City Council Chambers Audio Visual Systems Upgrade Project; and

3. Directs the City Clerk to record the attached Notice of Completion for said contract work within 15 days of the date of resolution and provide a copy to the contractor (Cal. Civil Code Section 9204).

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cotati held on May 13, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:
65 of 539
Approved:___________________________
Mayor
Attest:______________________________
Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to form:______________________________
City Attorney
66 of 539
After recording, return to:

Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
City of Cotati
201 W. Sierra Avenue
Cotati, CA 94931-4217

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

1. The City Council of the City of Cotati has accepted the improvements at the City Council meeting of May 13, 2025, for the City Council Chambers Audio Visual System Upgrades Project. The nature of the City of Cotati’s interest, as owner, of the property is as public facility.

2. The improvements were completed and deemed complete by the City Manager on April 27, 2025.

3. The name of the original contractor for the project was CODA Technology Group, for a total constructed amount of $300,291.07.

4. This Notice of Completion constitutes the City’s acceptance of the improvements for this project.

I am the City Manager for the City of Cotati, a Municipal Corporation. I make this verification on behalf of the City of Cotati. I have read the Notice and know its contents. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: _________________ ___________________________
Damien O’Bid
City Manager
67 of 539
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: ADOPT UPDATED RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE
Date: May 13, 2025
Written by: Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution to adopt an updated records retention schedule.

Background
The City last adopted a retention schedule in 2016. In the interest of increasing efficiency and ease of use, along with ensuring that recent State law changes are correctly applied to the retention of records, the City worked with Western Integrated Systems to provide a refresh to the City’s adopted retention schedule.

Analysis/Discussion
The retention schedule presented to the City Council updates the previous schedule with the most recent changes in Government Code, and modifies the format of the retention schedule to enable more efficient use when reviewing records and applying the correct retention. Over the years, Staff have identified that many of the record names in the previous retention schedule were disconnected from the names of records commonly used internally. This update aligns the names of the records to promote efficiency in identification. As the City embarks on a multi-year process to identify archived records currently in offsite storage, efficiency gains are critical to ensure a timely process.

Financial Considerations
68 of 539
The City has an interest in digitizing all records and also reducing the cost of offsite storage of historical records. Staff have been assessing the records stored offsite, and either identifying them as ”expired,” or digitizing them for ease of access, use, and preservation. By clarifying record types in the updated retention schedule, Staff will be able to more quickly identify records, speeding up the process of removing them from offsite storage, and realizing savings in storage costs.

Environmental Issues
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378.
69 of 539
RESOLUTION NO. (XX)

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI ADOPTING

AN UPDATED RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE AND SUPERSEDING
RESOLUTION 2016-10
WHEREAS, Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California provides a procedure whereby any City record which has served its purpose and is no longer required may be destroyed; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the effective operation of the government of the City of Cotati to facilitate the retention of records in accordance with the law and business needs, while simultaneously reducing current and future records storage costs, eliminating duplication of effort, and increasing efficiency and rapid access to records; and WHEREAS, the City of Cotati has previously adopted Resolution 2016-10 relating to records retention and destruction.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Retention Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A shall go into effect immediately and the records of the City of Cotati, as set forth in the Retention Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby authorized to be destroyed as provided by Section 34090 et seq of the Government Code of the State of California and in accordance with the applicable provision(s) of said schedule upon the request of a Department Head in with the consent in writing of the City Clerk and City Attorney, without further action by the City Council of the City of Cotati.

Section 2. Resolution 2016-10 is hereby superseded in it’s entirety.

Section 3. The City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee to make minor updates to the Retention Schedule, as approved by the City Attorney, when necessary to better identify record types/categories, without changing the retention periods.

Section 4. The City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee to make minor updates to the Retention Schedule, as approved by the City Attorney, when necessary to update retention periods to conform with changes in law.

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cotati held on May 13, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

Approved:___________________________
Mayor
70 of 539
Attest:______________________________
Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to form:______________________________
City Attorney
71 of 539

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
12345

A B C DE F G H I J K L
Record Category
Code
Record Series
Name
Applicable
Dept(s)
Business
Process Status Record Category Description Retention Also Known As Legal Citations Comments Cheryl's Comment ALL011 Audits (Internal,
External)
All Departments Audit Records and information related
to auditing activities, including reviewing and documenting operational, compliance, or financial information created as a part of an audit.

CY+10Y Logs
Activity tracking reports Completed
Checklists
CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501e - (6Y)US - 26 USC 6531 - (TAX+6Y) ALL012 Maintenance,
Repairs
All Departments Buildings/Parks Records and information regarding the ongoing maintenance and upkeep of City equipment, facilities parks and infrastructure. 5Y Horticulture
HVAC Manuals, Repair RecordsMaintenance and Repair Work OrdersMaintenance ReportsIrrigationLandscapingTreesBenches CA - CCP 337 - (5Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ADM013 Code Compliance
and Enforcement
ADMINistrative Services: Police and Community Development Code Enforcement s/b Community Development
Vital Records and information
documenting compliance with City codes, including violations.

CL+3Y Code Citations
Code EnforcementCode ViolationsCompliance with Conditions of ApprovalInspections / Enforcement (Business, Residential) InvestigationsNotices of ViolationPhotographsResolutionVehicle Abatement (abandoned vehicles) - PDViolations CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 40 CFR 122.21 - (3Y)US - 40 CFR 122.41 - (3Y) AR = Annual Review CL* = Closed / Completion / Final Resolution CY = Current Year FR = Final Report

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
6789

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ALL014 Community
Outreach, Media and Public Relations
All Departments Communication
s, Outreach
External-facing communications, advertising and press relations materials, including documentation of outreach activities/events held in cooperation or for the benefit of the local community. 2Y Biographies of Public Officials, Agency Heads
BrochuresFAQsMailersMedia Packets, Releases, KitsNewspaper ClippingsNews, Press ReleasesPress KitsPublic / Media InquiriesPublic Information / Outreach / EducationPublications Produced by the CityPublicity FilesPublicity PhotographsSocial Media DocumentationSpecial Events CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ALL015 Permissions,
Releases
All Departments Communication
s, Outreach
Records of permissions and releases for publications and logos. 2Y Publication Permissions/Releases
Logo Permissions/Releases
CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ALL016 Compliance
Reporting
All Departments Compliance Official governmental reports issued by City to comply with regulatory requirements.
5Y EEOC Reports
Labor ReportsPERS Report
CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 29 CFR 405.9 - (5Y)US - 29 CFR 1602.14 - (FR+1Y)US - 29 CFR 1602.30 - (3Y)US - 40 CFR 141.155 - (3Y) ALL017 Economic
Development Programs and Services
All Departments Economic
Development
Records and information documenting the City's economic development programs. 10Y Appraisals
Business Promotion ProgramsBusiness Recruitment ProgramsCommunity ActivitiesCommunity DataEconomic Development ProgramsEconomic Development Project FilesEconomic Development Strategic Planning CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
1011

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ALL018 Business and
Personal Licenses and Permits
All Departments Fees, Licensing,
Permitting
Documentation of licenses, nonbuilding permits and other authorizations issued in the City.

CL+4Y Alarms
Annual LicensesBusiness LicensesDog LicensesEncroachment PermitsFlood Zone DeterminationsHandgun PermitsHome Business LicensesHome Occupation Permits (HOP)Massage EstablishmentsMassage TechniciansMedical Marijuana Dispensary LicensesMobile Vendors, PeddlersTaxis (cabs, drivers) Transportation Permits (oversize, overweight)
CA - CCP 337 (4Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ALL019 Fees Collection and
Fee Maintenance
All Departments Fees, Licensing,
Permitting
Vital Records and information
documenting general administration and maintenance of City fee payments, collection, and receipts.

CY+4Y Assessment District Fees
Building Permit FeesBusiness License FeesCopying FeesCandidate Filing FeesEncroachment FeesFacility Use FeesFee Schedules, ReportingFilm PermitsGrading FeesImpact FeesInspection FeesLicensing/Permitting Penalties, FinesMobile Home Rent Stabilization Fee Exemption AnalysisOversize/Overweight Permit FeesPenalty FeesPlan Review Processing FeesRecreation Program FeesTraffic FeesWater Systems (including irrigation) Fees CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 - (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
1213

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ALL020 Grants and Funding
Sources
All Departments Finance Vital Documents the application, evaluation, awarding, administration, monitoring, and status of grants and other funding sources in which a local government entity is the recipient, grantor, allocator, or administrator.

CL*+5Y Applications (including project proposals)
AuditsAwardsAward NotificationBudget Tracking ReportsCommunity Development Block Grants (CDBG)Enterprise Funds (water, waste, housing )FEMA / OES ReimbursementsFederal, State, Local GrantsFunding Source RecordsGas TaxGrant AdministrationGrant FundingGrant EvaluationsProgram Rules, Regulations, ProceduresProperty Taxes FundingReports to Funding AgenciesSpecial Revenue FundsTransportation Funding CA - GOV 34090 - (2)US - 7 CFR 3016.42 - (3Y)US - 24 CFR 85.42 - (3Y)US - 28 CFR 66.42 - (3Y)US - 29 CFR 97.42 - (3Y)US - 40 CFR 31.42 - (3Y)US - 44 CFR 13.42 - (3Y)US - 45 CFR 92.42 - (3Y) US - 24 CFR Part 91 - (5Y) * CL = Close of Grant, Plus All Final Audit Report Completed; if grant is in perpetuity, it never closes; or, retain per contract stipulation, whichever is longer.

ALL021 Payroll All Departments Finance Vital, PII Records and information related to the accounting of City payroll, including garnishment records and information to satisfy debts. This also includes records and information reflecting all remuneration paid to each employee, including: - Name, address, SSN - Total amount and date of payments - Period of service covered for each - Withholding - Tax collected CY+4Y 1099
1099RAttendance Records, CorrectionsBenefit PaymentsCalPERS ReportingDeduction Registers, ReportsDeferred CompensationEmployee BenefitsEmployee Deduction Authorizations, Check Information, Extra Help ReportsEmployee Master Lists, AddressesFederal TaxGarnishmentsGarnishment Orders, ReceiptsLongevity PayPayroll Checks, Copies, Stub ReportsPayroll Certifications, ControlsPayroll Deduction Authorizations, History, Liens, ClaimsPayroll Earnings RegistersPayroll Tax ReturnsPersonnel Action FormsProcessing Reports, Reports to Government AgenciesSocial Security TaxState TaxTime Sheets - ReportsTimekeeping Records (Timecards, Time Sheets, Basic Time and Earnings Cards) CA - CCR 1085-2 (c) - (4Y)CA - GOV 12946 - (2Y)CA - LAB 226a (3)CA - LAB 1174 - (3Y)CA - LAB 1197.5 - (LA2Y)CA - UIC 1132 - (LA3Y)US - 26 USC 3301-3311 - (4Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001-1 (4Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y)US - 29 CFR 516.5 - (3Y)US - 29 CFR 516.6 - (2Y)US - 29 CFR 1620.32 - (2Y)US - 29 CFR 1627.3 - (3Y)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
1415161718

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ALL021 Procurement,
Purchasing and Requisitioning
All Departments Finance Vital Records and information created or retained in the purchasing or acquisition of goods and services. Documentation that includes the terms and conditions under which vendors will provide goods or services. After preparation and purchase pertinent information becomes part of contract file or project file and other information is considered to be draft.

CY+4Y Request for Proposal, Request for Quote, Request for Offer CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) CA - CCP 337 - (4Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y)US - 29 CFR 516.5 - (3Y) ALL022 Strategic Planning,
Budget Planning and Workpapers
All Departments Finance Records and information
regarding the strategic planning and development of City, council, commission or departmental budgets. 2Y Strategic Planning Documents
Budget Planning DocumentsBudget Working FilesBudget Workpapers, Worksheets CA - GOV 34090 (2Y)
ALL023 Vendor, Supplier
Files
All Departments Finance Records and information of
suppliers and vendors to all City organizations created or retained in the purchasing or acquisition of goods and services. 2Y Contractors - Vendor List
Supplier CatalogsVendor PacketsVendor Applications, Profiles CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ALL024 Fleet Management,
Maintenance
All Departments Fleet
Management
Records related to the purchase, management and maintenance of City vehicles.

LI*+2Y Auction Vehicles
California Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR) Smog RecordsCalifornia Highway Patrol Biennial Inspection Terminal (BIT) RecordsMotor Vehicle Records and ReportsPool Tickets, Vehicle Logs, Usage LogsRegistrations, Operating PermitsRental Work OrdersService CallsTax Exemption CertificatesVehicle Certificates of InsuranceVehicle InspectionsVehicle License Plate RecordsVehicle Maintenance Records, Repair Orders CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6501 - (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y) Legal consideration is life of the asset plus 2 years
ALL025 Fuel Management All Departments Fleet
Management
PII Records related to the purchase,
tracking and management of fuel for City vehicles and travel by City employees. Does not include reimbursements to City employees for use of their vehicles. 4Y (aboveground storage tank - AST)
California Air Resources Board CertificateFuel Card AuthorizationsFuel Pump, Fuel Tank MaintenanceFuel Reports, Billing Reports, Journals, Fuel TicketsMileage Reports CA - 18 CCR 4901 - (4Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
192021

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ALL026 Business Continuity
Plans
All Departments General Vital All documentation of City plans for dealing with disasters and/or system failures. Legal recommendation is keep prior plan to answer questions about decisions made in that time period.

S+4Y Business Continuity Plans
Disaster PreparednessDisaster Recovery PlanDrill RecordsEmergency Contact Lists, Employee Lists, Roster of WorkersEmergency Evacuation ProceduresEmergency Operations CenterEmergency PreparednessEmergency ResponseEmergency ServicesHazardous Materials Response PlanningSchool ViolenceSearch and RescueTelephone TreesTerrorism CA - CCP 337.1 - (LA4Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ALL027 Convenience
Information
All Departments General Non-record documents and
materials retained for immediate personal use purposes and then discarded.

AR Articles (newspaper, magazine, journal)
Census DataClassification StudiesData Processing Subject Files (Correspondence, Reference Publications, Reports)Extracted Data SummariesGeneral Plan Reference FilesRecords Inventory Considered non-record research material. Note: emails, texts, meeting transcripts, that contain have content that is a record, need to be retained for the period of the record type.

ALL028 Department
Administration
All Departments General General internal administrative records of City departments.
2Y Chronological Files
Department CommitteesDepartment Goals, ObjectivesDepartment PlansEmployee Desk FilesGeneral FilesIn-House Committees / Employee CommitteesNotesOffice Files, Office Manager FilesOrganization ChartsStaff MeetingsTraffic Accident Reports (No Claim)Volunteer Recognition Events CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
222324

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ALL029 Historical Artifacts,
Documents, Events, Memorabilia and Collections
All Departments General Historic
potential
Records and information documenting the history and significant milestones of the City including dedications, ribboncuttings, grand openings, and groundbreaking ceremonies.

PR Annual Budgets
City Generated Historical Studies / ReportsCity Manager Press ReleasesCity PublicationsExecutive, City Official Communications, Speeches, VideosHistory of the OrganizationHistorical Events, Artifacts, Architecture, Designations, ProjectsHistorical Parks, FacilitiesList of Historic PropertiesMemorial ProgramsPicture CollectionsSignificant News Clippings, Releases CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ALL030 Lists, Logs and
General Reporting
All Departments General General routine reports
generated by the City, as well as records and information captured on a log or a list for tracking of certain information.

CL+2Y Calendars
City Generated Routine Studies / ReportsContact ListsDiaries, NotepadsFiles Index, IndicesInactive Records Storage InformationTelephone Answer Pads, Book, MessagesTelephone Directory Lists CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ALL031 Policies, Procedures
and Plans
All Departments General All documentation of City,
agency, council, commission, special district or department policy and procedures.

CL+10Y Directives
GuidelinesHandbooksMaster PlansPoliciesProcedure ManualsProceduresProgram / Initiative PlansRecords Retention ScheduleRules / RegulationsStandards CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6501 - (CY+3Y)US - 29 CFR 1602.14 - (FR+1Y)US - 29 CFR 1627.3 - (TE+1Y)US - 29 USC 1059 - (TE+1Y) Operational retention is 10 years after completion.

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
25262728

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ALL032 Project and Subject
Working Files
All Departments General Records documenting specific
activities related to a particular project or subject.

CL+2Y Auditing, Accounting Matter Complaint Logs
City Owned EquipmentCity ProgramsConsultantsEconomicsGrowth ManagementJoint Planning Projects City / CountyPositive FeedbackProject FilesProject ReportingProject/Program PlanRisk ManagementStudiesSubject FilesSurveys / QuestionnairesWorking Files CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ALL033 Service Issues,
Complaints
All Departments General Documentation regarding
department complaints and related requests for service.

CL+2Y Help Desk Data, Tickets
Issues LogTrouble Reports
CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ALL034 Shipping and
Receiving
All Departments General Records related to the shipping and receiving of products.
2Y Bills of Lading
Freight BillsManifests, Transfer LogsWaybills
CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
CM035 Collective Bargaining City Manager Labor Relations Documentation related to the negotiations between labor unions for collective bargaining purposes.

CL+10Y Contract Negotiations
Labor RelationsUnion CommunicationsUnion Petitions
CA - GOV 12946 - (2Y)CA - LAB 5410 - (LA5Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001-1 - (CY+4Y) City Manager and Police Depts.

Only.

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
2930

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CM036 Collective Bargaining
Grievances
City Manager Labor Relations Documentation related to labor grievances filed under current collective bargaining agreements.

CL+10Y Grievance Files/Commission Hearing
Grievance/Hearing LogsUnion Grievances
CA - CCP 312 - (LA4Y)CA - CCP 315 - (LA10Y)CA - CCP 337 - (4Y)CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - GOV 12946 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001-1 - (CY+4Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y)US - 40 CFR 70.6 - (AC+5Y)US - 40 CFR 122.21(p) - (3Y)US - 40 CFR 122.41(j) - (3Y)US - 49 CFR 107.504 - (AC+2Y) ALL037 Agreements,
Contracts and Leases
All Departments Legal Vital Executed agreements between the City and other parties.

CL+10Y CA - CCP 315 - (LA10Y)
CA - CCP 337 - (4Y)CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - CCP 343 - (4Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001-1 - (CY+4Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y)US - 40 CFR 70.6 - (CL+5Y)US - 40 CFR 122.21(p) - (3Y)US - 40 CFR 122.41(j) - (3Y)US - 49 CFR 107.504 - (CL+2Y)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
3132

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CM038 Case Files, Claims,
Litigation, Arbitration and Resolution
All Departments Legal Records and information created
or collected to support the City's position in actual or potential litigation or to otherwise evaluate actual or potential litigation relating to the organization, including claims, constituent complaints, grievances, worker compensation. Litigation includes third party litigation, government investigations, mediations, arbitrations, and other judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings.

CL+10Y ADA Case Files Arbitration
Case CorrespondenceCease & Desist LettersClaims, including Mobile Home Rent ControlClaims Against City, Special DistrictComplaintsContract DisputesCourt OrdersConstituent ClaimsDemand LettersEEOC Charges, CasesInjury ReportsMeet and ConferPleadings (Affidavits, Depositions, Exhibits, Court Filings)Settlement CopiesSubpoenasUnemployment Compensation ClaimsUnemployment Compensation Data, Weekly Earnings DataWorker Compensation Benefits (Awards, Claims, Orders, Reports)
CA - 2 CCR 11013 - (CL+2Y)CA - 8 CCR 10102 - (5Y; AC+1Y)CA - 8 CCR 10103.1 - (5Y)CA - 22 CCR 1085-2 - (4)CA - LAB 5410 - (LA5Y)CA - RTC 7154 - (LA5Y)CA - RTC 19384 - (LA4Y)CA - RTC 19704 - (LA6Y)CA - UIC 1132 - (LA3Y)CA - CCP 315 - (LA10Y)CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6532-1 - (LA2Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6532-2 - (LA5Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6532-3 (a) - (LA9M)US - 26 USC 6531 - (LA6Y)US - 26 USC 6532 - (LA2Y)US - 29 USC 255 - (LA2Y)US - 29 USC 626 (d) - (LA300D)US - 35 USC 286 - (6Y)US - 42 USC 2000e-5 (e ) - (LA180D)US - 42 USC 2000e-5 (f) - (LA180D) * CL = Final resolution of all claims, appeals.

ALL039 Audio/Visual
recordings
All Departments Meetings,
Minutes
Review for historic status
CY+2 CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) Boards, Commissions including (but not limited to):Planning Commission

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
333435

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ALL040 Official Meetings,
Legislative Actions
All Departments Meetings,
Minutes
Historic potential
Legislative and non-legislative actions that document policy development, including Council and Committee and Appointed Advisory body meeting minutes and Ordinances.

PR Agenda Packets and Face sheets
Boards and Commissions Meetings, MinutesCity CodesCity-wide Plans/Programs AdoptedMeeting Minutes, Notices, Recordings, TranscriptsMinute Books & IndexMunicipal CodeOrdinancesProclamationsResolutionsSummary of Actions, Statement of Actions (SOAs) CA - CCP 315 - (LA10Y)CA - CCP 321 - (5Y)CA - CCP 336 - (5Y)CA - CCP 336a - (6Y)CA - CCP 337 - (4Y)CA - CCP 337.5 - (LA10Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)CA - GOV 60201 - (PR)CA - GOV 60201 - (SU+5Y)**US - 48 CFR 4.703 - (AC+3Y)US - 48 CFR 52.249 - (AC+3Y) ** Ordinances, once repealed or overridden, may be destroyed 5 years after being superseded.Boards, Commissions, Council, Advisory Board ALL041 Public Notices All Departments Meetings,
Minutes
Records documenting compliance with laws requiring public notice of government activities. Subjects include assessments, elections, land use changes, public meetings and hearings, sale of property, and others. 4Y Affidavits of Posting
Affidavits of Publication/Legal NoticesPublic Hearing Notices CA - CCP 343 - (4Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
Brown Act challenges must be filed within 30 or 90 days of action; Statute of Limitations on Municipal Government actions is 3 - 6 months ALL042 Administration All Departments Office Services Records and information regarding mail, printing and general office services operations. 2Y Certified Mail Reports
Cost Recovery ReportsExpress Mail Tracking (FedEx, UPS, etc.)Forms (Masters)Inventory TrackingOrder FormsPostage TrackingPostal RecordsPrinting OrdersProduction FilesSupplies Management

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
36373839

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ALL043 Public Works Project
Files (CIP)
All Departments Projects Records and information related to the analysis, design, development, planning, construction and maintenance of public works, capital improvement and engineering projects for City facilities and infrastructure.

PR As-Built Plans
AssessmentsBicycle / Pedestrian Trails / PathsBridges and CreeksCalculationsCapacity (water, wastewater) FeesCapital Improvement Project (CIP) FilesCertificates of Compliance/Notice of Non-ComplianceChange OrdersClosuresCurb & GutterDevelopment Fee BookDrainage PermitsE.I.R., Notice of Determination, Categorical ExemptionsEncroachment Permits, CertificatesEnvironmental Impact StatementsFinal Improvement PlansGeologic StudiesGrading PermitsInsurance CertificatesMaterials Testing ReportsMediansNotice of CompletionParkingParking (residential, non-residential)Pavement Markings / Traffic LegendsPhotos/Pictures CA - CCP 337.1 - (LA4Y)CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - 14 CCR 15095c - (Reasonable)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)CA - HSC 19850 - (LI) Public Records Requests
All Departments Public Records
Act
Records requested by the public and related inquiries.

CL+2Y Collection Lists
Formal Public Records Requests
CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ALL044 Recreation Programs
and Services
All Departments Recreation Records and information
documenting the City's recreational programs and services.

CL*+2Y Adult Services Programs / Classes
ApplicationsAquaticsCultural Activities Programs / ClassesFacility Rentals (use applications, permits, insurance)Liability WaiversPrograms, Classes, LeaguesRegistrations FormsSpecial EventsTeen Services Programs / ClassesYouth Services Programs / ClassesWithdrawal Forms CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) * Repeat users of facilities
remain active
CM045 Background Checks City Manager and
Police Department
Staffing PII All documentation related to
background checks for both paid employees and unpaid volunteers.

T+2Y CA - GOV 12946 - (FR+2Y)
CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
City Manager and Police Departments only.

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
4041

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ALL046 Personnel Files -
Volunteers
All Departments Staffing All documents related to unpaid volunteers and interns.

CL+3Y Applications, Applicant Reference Verifications
Attendance RecordsAwards, Rewards, Commendations, CertificatesChange in Status (CIS)ComplaintsData Protection Forms (Signed)Volunteer Acknowledgements, Executed Policy ReceiptsGoalsIndividual Education, Development, Training RecordsInvestigationsLiability Waiver (copies)RecognitionResignations, Exit Interview NotesRoles, Responsibilities No legal citations Operational retention is
completion of the service plus 3 years.

ALL046 Training Materials,
Courses, Scheduling
All Departments Staffing Documentation regarding the
courses and schedules for training offered to employees for training and development.

S+6Y Attendance Lists
Educational AssistanceEmployee DevelopmentPresentation MaterialsPowerPoint Slide DecksTesting CA - GOV 12946 - (2Y)CA - LAB 3076.3 - (5Y)US - 29 CFR 1602.14 - (CY+1Y)US - 45 CFR 164.530 (j) - (CY+6Y) Operational retention is superseded plus 6 years.

Break out hazardous and lab testing into separate record series.

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
424344

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ADM010 Accounts
Payable/Receivable
Administrative Services
Accounting Vital Records and information related
to the accounting of monies paid or received by the City including payment for financial obligation, documenting bad debt, paying of unemployment expenses, employee expense reimbursement, money paid for fines or fees, services rendered, vendor credit cards, cash payments received, etc.

CY+10Y Allocations
Backflow Billing - PWCash DisbursementCash ReceiptsContract BalancesCredit Card Slips, StatementsDeveloper Billing - CD, PWEmployee Expense Reports, ReimbursementsFacilities FeesFixed / Capital Asset AccountingFlex SpendingForm 1099 RecordsForm W-9 RecordsFully Burden RatesInvoices and VouchersJournal VouchersOperating Invoices, Paid (General, Contract Vendors) Payables Package, ReceiptsPaymentsPetty Cash DataPublic Defender Billing - PDReceivables Package, ReceiptsUtility BillingVendor Invoices CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 - (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y) ADM011 Cost Accounting Administrative
Services
Accounting Records and information tracking
City costs.

CY+4Y Billing Rates, Journal
Month-End Cost Records
CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y) Operational retention is 4 years
ADM012 Credit, Collections Administrative
Services
Accounting PII, Vital Records and information
generated or collected in the tracking of debtor transactions and balances.

CY+10Y Accruals
Bad Check LogsBad Debt ReservesCredit, Collections and AgingCredit MemosCredit ReportsCredit ReviewsCustomer PaymentsRefund ClaimsUncollectable AccountsWrite-offs, Adjustments CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y) Operational retention is 10 years

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
45464748

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ADM013 General Ledger,
Journal Entries
Administrative Services
Accounting Records and information related
to the transfer of charges between accounts and summaries of account information, including year end summaries of general ledger transactions.

CY+10Y Account Ledgers
Appropriations TransfersBalance SheetsBooks of AccountCash JournalsChart of AccountsDemand RegisterExpenditure ReportsGeneral LedgerJournal EntriesManual Accounting Ledger, Control LedgerPayroll JournalPurchases JournalReports-Due to Due FromReports-Transfer Ins-OutsSub-LedgersTrial BalanceYear End / Account Detail History Report CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y) Operational retention is 10 years
ADM014 Real Property, Fixed
Assets
Administrative Services
Accounting Vital Records and information related
to the ownership, purchase, sale, lease or improvement of real property and facilities owned by or used by the City.

LI*+10Y Acquisitions
Amortization SchedulesAsset Retirement RecordsAttachmentsBuildingsCapital Asset RecordsCapital ImprovementsDepreciation SchedulesFixed Asset LedgerMortgagesParklandPossessory InterestSalesValuation Information CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 - (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y) * LI = Life of Building, Asset
ADM015 Taxes Administrative
Services
Accounting Vital Records and information related
to taxes collected and paid by the City.

CY+4Y General Fund Taxes
Property TaxReal Property Tax / Tax RateSales/Use TaxTransient Occupancy Tax CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) Operational retention is current
year plus 4 years
ADM016 Bank Account
Information
Administrative Services
Banking Vital Records and information related
to banking activities, transactions and correspondence. This category includes deposits and reconciliations.

CY+10Y CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
US - 26 CFR 31.6001 (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y) Legal consideration: 10 years

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
4950515253

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ADM017 Budget Management Administrative
Services
Budgets, Planning
Records and information relating to creating and implementing the final approved budget.

CY+10Y CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
US - 26 CFR 31.6001 (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y) Legal consideration: 10 years
ADM018 Financial, Strategic
Planning
Administrative Services
Budgets, Planning
Records and information relating to financial planning.

CY+10Y Business Plans
Financial PlansForecastsInterim ResultsRevenue ForecastsStrategic Plans CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) All Departments participate in
the City's annual Strategic Planning Process
ADM019 Financial Reporting -
Annual, Official
Administrative Services
Financial Reporting
Official City financial reports required by regulations.

CY+10Y Annual Report of Financial Transactions To State Annual State Controller FilingsAudited Financial StatementsEEOC ReportsPossessory Interest Report / Lease ReportsState Controllers Office Reports (Streets, Cities, Transactions) CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 1.1461-2 - (CY+1Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (3Y) Operational requirement is 10 years
ADM020 Financial Reporting -
Periodic (Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly)
Administrative Services
Financial Reporting
General financial reports generated to track financial transactions and achievements by the City.

CY+10Y 1099 Reports
Business License ReportsExpenditures ReportsMonthly Treasurer's ReportPayroll Reports (HRA, RMT, ICMA 457 accounts, Nationwide, deferred compensation) Pooled Cash Reports
CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) Operational requirement is 10
years
ADM021 Abandoned
Property, Escheat
Administrative Services
Treasurer Records and information
pertaining to unclaimed funds and warrants held in trust by the City. 10Y Cancelled Warrants (escheat)
Uncashed Checks
CA - CCP 1513 - (3Y)US - Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1995), Section 3 - (10Y)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
545556

A B C DE F G H I J K L
ADM022 Investments Administrative
Services
Treasurer Vital Records and information relating
to analysis of City financing and investment activities.

LI+10Y Bonds
Bonded IndebtednessCash BondsCertificates of Deposit (CDs)Certificates of ParticipationCompensated AbsencesDirect InvestmentsDue DiligenceExempted SecuritiesFinancial Investment PlanningGASB 68Investment Performance ReportingInvestment ReportingLoansLocal Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)Long Term DebtMoney Manager StatementsOPEBPerformance Bonds, Letters of CreditPortfolio Management, Quarterly ReviewsRedevelopment Agency RecordsRevenue BondsReturns ManagementSEC DisclosuresSecurity InstrumentsStock / Equity / Debt Issuance, Repurchase RecordsTrustee Accounts CA - CCP 336 - (5Y)CA - CCP 337 - (4Y)CA - CCP 337.5 (10Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001 (CY+3Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 (CY+3) * CL = Maturity of Investment
CM010 Franchise
Administration
City Manager General Records and information
pertaining to the administration of utility and service franchises within the City. 5Y Pacific Gas & Electric
Pacific Telephone & TelegraphCable TV SystemSolid WasteRecyclingTrash Services CA - CCP 337 - (4Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
Operational retention is 5 years.

CM011 Benefit Plans City Manager Benefits Plans and systems established to provide employee benefits and associated administrative documents.

LI*+6Y MOU, Personnel Rules Health plans ( Kaiser, etc) US - 29 USC 1027 - (6Y) US - 29 USC 1059 - (TE+1Y)US - 29 USC 1113 - (LA6Y)US - 29 USC 1451 - (LA6Y)US - 29 CFR 4007.10 - (6Y)US - 29 CFR 4041.5 - (LI*+6Y) * LI = Life of Plan

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
575859

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CM012 Employee Benefits City Manager Benefits PII, PHI Employee election (selection), enrollment or termination forms and related correspondence, including transmissions to carriers of additions, changes, claims and deletions (includes employee medical records subject to HIPAA requirements).

CL+6Y Actuarial Analysis for Benefit Reserves and Accounting Appeals Benefits Files, Contract Copies, Enrollments, AppealsBeneficiary DesignationsDeath Claims, Life Event DocumentsEmployee Cost-Sharing AmountsEmployment Authorizations, Terminations, Confirmations, Status Changes, Coverage ChangesFamily & Medical Leave Tracking (Compensation, Complaints/Disputes, FMLA Requests, Parental Leave Forms, Paid/Unpaid Leave ) Flexible Spending EnrollmentIndividual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), 401k HistoriesLife Insurance Notification Letters/EOILeave of Absence DocumentationMedical Billing StatementsPension Plan Applications, ClaimsPremium InformationRequired Benefits ReportingRetirement Loans / Retirement CA - 22 CCR 1085-2 - (4Y)CA - GOV 12946 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y)US - 29 CFR 516.6 - (2Y)US - 29 CFR 825.500 - (3Y)US - 29 USC 1027 - (6Y)US - 29 USC 1059 - (TE+1Y)US - 29 USC 1113 - (LA6Y)US - 29 USC 1451 - (LA6Y)US - 29 CFR 4007.10 - (6Y) CM013 Election Records -
Unsuccessful Candidates
City Manager Elections Records and information related
to the filing of campaign and election documentation by candidates not elected.

CL+5Y Campaign Disclosures, Nomination Papers CA - GOV 81009 - (5Y) CM014 Election Records -
Vital
City Manager Elections Records and information related
to the filing and performance of City elections, as well as to elected candidates.

PR Ballot Measures
Campaign Disclosures, Nomination PapersCampaign InformationCandidatesCertificates of Election, Sample BallotsCertification of Election ResultsFair Political Practices Commission Files CA - ELEC 17200 - (8M)CA - ELEC 17302 - (6M)CA - ELEC 17304 - (6M)CA - ELEC 17306 - (6M)CA - ELEC 17503 - (6M)CA - GOV 81009 (PR)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
6061626364

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CM015 Petitions City Manager Elections Documentation related to ballot initiatives, referenda, recalls, charter amendments and other community petitions for a vote of the people. 8 Months Petition/Ballot Initiatives
Charter AmendmentsRecall CampaignsReferendum Campaigns
CA - ELEC 17200 - (8M)CA - ELEC 17302 - (6M)CA - ELEC 17304 - (6M)CA - ELEC 17306 - (6M)CA - ELEC 17503 - (6M)CA - GOV 81009 (PR) CM016 Proposition 218 City Manager Elections Documentation related to Proposition 218 assessment elections records.
6 Months Assessment Ballot Proceeding
BallotsProperty Related FeesLighting and Landscape Asssessments? Mello Roos (CFD) AssessmentsProposition 218 CA - ELEC 17302 - (6M)
CM017 Proposition 218
Assessment Districts
City Manager Elections Records and information related
to ballots and protest letters for assessment districts. 2Y Ballots
Protest Letters
CA - ELEC 17302 - (6M)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
Property owner elections only.

CM018 Appointments City Manager General Appointments made by authorized elected officials to councils, committees, boards, commissions, task forces, other advisory groups, or public offices, including those to fill vacancies for otherwise elected positions.

T+2Y CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
CM019 Statements of
Economic Interest and Ethics Training
City Manager General Forms mandated by state law
related to economic interests of certain employees, elected or appointed officials, or candidates for office and required training.

CL+7Y Form 460 (Campaign Statements)
Form 700 (Economic Interest Statements, SEI)
Form 801Form 802Form 806
CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)CA - GOV 81009 (4Y, 7Y)CA - AB1234

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
656667

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CM020 Claims Management City Manager Insurance Vital Records detailing claims against insurance coverage by the City, including appraisals and reports.

CL+10Y Incident Reports
Annual Audit of Open ClaimsAppraisalsClaims By/Against the CityDamage Estimate ReportsSupporting DocumentationInsurance Claims, Appraisals, ReportsInvestigationsLiability Waivers CA - CCP 337 - (5Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
Legal consideration: 10 years
CM021 Insurance Coverage City Manager Insurance Vital Records detailing the City's general coverage against property damage and liability, including renewal submission information, insurance quotes, & broker correspondence.

CL+6Y Binding Information
BindersBroker CorrespondenceCertificates of InsuranceCompleted ApplicationsDisability InsuranceFlood InsuranceInsurance PoliciesInsurance Procured by Others (Vendors)Insurance QuotesInsurance SubmissionsLiability InsuranceRenewal StrategyUnemployment Insurance CA - 22 CCR 3267-2 - (MAINT)CA - CCP 337 - (5Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) Operational retention is 6 years.

CM022 Advice and Opinions City Manager Legal Records documenting legal counsel and advice on various matters.

S+10Y CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
6869

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CM023 Employee Medical
Records
City Manager Occupational
Health
PHI Documents pertaining to medical
records of City employees, including exposure to hazardous substances, drug screens, and workers' compensation (includes employee records subject to HIPAA requirements).

T+30Y Drug Screening
Employee Hazardous Chemical ExposureEmployee Medical RecordsExposure MonitoringFirearms and Field ExposureHazardous ExposureHIPAA Employee RecordsMaterial Data Safety Sheets (MSDS)Personnel Files - MedicalRadiation Exposure RecordsToxic Substance Exposure RecordsWorker Compensation CA - 8 CCR 14300.33 - (5Y)CA - 8 CCR 3204 - (TE+30Y)CA - 19 CCR 2760.9 - (5Y)CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - CCP 338 - (LA3Y)CA - CCP 338.1 - (LA5Y)CA - GOV 12946 - (2Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)CA - 29 CFR 1904.33 - (CY+5Y)US - 29 CFR 1910.95 - (TE+2Y)US - 29 CFR 1910.1020 - (30Y)US - 40 CFR 68.81 - (5Y)US - 40 CFR 268.7 - (3Y) CM024 Recorded
Documents - Vital
City Manager Recording,
Filing
Vital Records and information
pertaining to those original key documents recorded on behalf of the City.

PR Abandonments
AnnexationsCity IncorporationConveyances from the City (Deeds, Easements, Abandonments)Conveyances to the City (Deeds, Easements, Dedications)DeedsDetachmentsEasementsEminent DomainGrant DeedsLiensParcel MapsRights-of-WayStreet / Alley Abandonments, ImprovementsVacations CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) Operational retention is
permanent.

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
7071

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CM025 Records, Information
Management
City Manager Recording,
Filing
Documentation of the compliance with Records and Information Management policy and procedures.

CL+10Y Certificates of Destruction
Document Hold Notices, UpdatesLists of Stored / Destroyed Records CA - CCP 315 - (LA10Y)CA - CCP 337 - (4Y)CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 31.6001-1 - (CY+4Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y)US - 40 CFR 70.6 - (CL+5Y)US - 40 CFR 122.21(p) - (3Y)US - 40 CFR 122.41(j) - (3Y)US - 49 CFR 107.504 - (CL+2Y) CM026 Employee Training -
General
City Manager Staffing All documents related to general
education and training taken by paid employees and unpaid volunteers, including: - FEMA/NIMS - Base Station Forms - Fire Extinguisher - First Aid/CPR - Safety 5Y Attendance
Certification RecordsCompliance TrainingCourses/Seminars (Taken by Employees - includes Safety Training)Ethics TrainingIndividual Education, Development CA - 8 CCR 3203 (CY+1)CA - GOV 53235.2b - (5Y)US - 29 CFR 1602.14 - (FR+1Y)US - 29 CFR 1602.31 - (CY+2Y)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
7273

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CM027 Personnel Files -
Employees
City Manager Staffing All documents related to paid
employees, including but not limited to: - hiring - promotion - demotion - transfer - layoff / recall / out-placement - termination / discharge / resignation - pay rates / other terms of compensation T+5Y Applications, Applicant Reference Verifications
Performance EvaluationsAttendance RecordsAwards, Rewards, Commendations, CertificatesChange in Status (CIS)Civil Service Examination Results and RankingsComplaintsData Protection Forms (Executed, Signed) Disciplinary Actions, TransfersDMV Pull Program (random testing )Employee Acknowledgements, Executed Policy ReceiptsEmployee Relations RecordsEmployee Training/Certification Records (FEMA/NIMS, Base Station Forms, Fire Extinguisher, First Aid/CPR) GoalsIndividual Employee Agreements, Contracts (copies)Individual Education, Development, Training RecordsInvestigationsJob Offer LettersLeave of Absence / LOAOaths of OfficeOut-Placement DataPerformance Evaluations, ReviewsPerformance Improvement Plans (PIPs), Counseling DocumentsPromotions, RecognitionResignations, Exit Interview NotesRoles, Responsibilities CA - 2 CCR 11013 (FR+2)CA - 8 CCR 14300.33 (CY+5)CA - CCP 312 - (LA4Y)CA - GOV 12946 - (TE+2Y)CA - LAB 3076.3 - (5Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y)US - 29 CFR 1602.14 - (FR+1Y)US - 29 CFR 1602.31 - (TE+2Y)US - 29 CFR 1627.3 - (TE+1Y)US - 29 USC 1059 - (TE+1Y)US - 41 CFR 60-1.12 (a) - (2Y)US - 41 CFR 60-250.80 - (2Y)US - 41 CFR 60-741.80 - (2Y) Operational retention is Termination plus 5 years.

CM028 Recruitment City Manager Staffing Records and information related to applications and related records of applicants
interviewed but not hired or accepted, including applications received but not acted upon.

CL+2Y Applications, CVs, Resumes (Rejected, Unsolicited) Applicant Tracking Records (Hired, Rejected)Background Checks, InvestigationsDrug Testing, Pre-Hire ScreeningInterview NotesJob DescriptionsJob Postings, AnnouncementsJob Requisition RequestsJob SpecificationsMiscellaneous Hiring Process NotesPosition InformationRecruitmentTemporary Intern StaffingTest Results (Non-hires)Unpaid Interns (Rejected)Volunteers (Rejected ) CA - GOV 12946 (FR+2)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 29 CFR 1627.3b1 (1)US - 29 CFR 1602.31 (CY+2Y) Operational retention is 3 years.

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
747576

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CM029 Salary,
Compensation
City Manager Staffing Documentation of position and
employee compensation.

S+3Y Classification Studies
Compensation Plans, Planning, AnalysisCost of LivingJob DescriptionsJob Evaluation DocumentationSalary Range HistorySalary Surveys CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 CFR 301.6501 - (CY+3Y)US - 29 CFR 1602.14 - (FR+1Y)US - 29 CFR 1627.3 - (TE+1Y)US - 29 USC 1001-1381 - (6Y)US - 29 USC 1059 - (TE+1Y)US - 48 CFR 4.703 - (AC+3Y)US - 48 CFR 52.249-2 & 3 - (AC+3Y) CM030 Work Authorizations
and Supporting Documentation
City Manager Staffing Employment eligibility verification forms collected for active employees and supporting documentation regarding immigration status.

T+1Y Employment Eligibility Forms
I-9 DocumentsImmigration Supporting Documentation
US - 20 CFR 655 Subpart H - (TE+1Y)US - 8 CFR 274a.2 - (3Y, or TE+1Y) CD010 Building Codes and
Permits
Community Development
Housing Vital Records and information
documenting the City's building services activities.

PR Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Documentation
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Permits Building CodesBuilding InspectionsBuilding Permits (issued, active, expired, history ) Building PlansCALGreen UpdatesCertificates of OccupancyStreet Address Files CA - CCP 337.1 - (LA4Y)CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2)CA - HSC 19850 - (LI)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
7778

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CD011 Housing Authority
Administration
Community Development
Housing Records and information of
housing agency operations and programs.

CL+10Y Applications
Compliance MonitoringForeclosure Prevention, CounselingHUD Reports (50058)Inclusionary Monitoring, ProjectsPredevelopment LoansRental Assistance, Vouchers (Section 8)ResalesSet-Aside FundsSupportive Services for VeteransTenant Files CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 24 CFR 84.53 - (LA3Y)US - 24 CFR 85.42(b) - (LA3Y)US - 24 CFR 511.15 - (3Y)US - 24 CFR 511.73 - (LA3Y)US - 24 CFR 570.490 - (LA3Y)US - 24 CFR 570.502(a)(16) - (LA4Y)US - 24 CFR 582.301 - (LA5Y) Includes the following programs and funds:- Cal Home First Time Homebuyers- Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS)- Family Self-Sufficiency- HELP First Time Homebuyers- HOME Funded First Time Homebuyers- HOME Program Rental Project- Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing- Housing Assistance Plan (HAP)- Housing Choice Vouchers- Rehab Program Loan- Section 8 Management Assessment (SEMAP)- Section 8 SRO Moderate Rehabilitation- Shelter Plus Care & Supportive Housing CD012 Housing Authority
Financials
Community Development
Housing Records and information of
housing agency operations and programs financial management.

PR Development / Affordability Agreements
Restricted Units
CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 24 CFR 84.53 - (LA3Y)US - 24 CFR 85.42(b) - (LA3Y)US - 24 CFR 511.15 - (3Y)US - 24 CFR 511.73 - (LA3Y)US - 24 CFR 570.490 - (LA3Y)US - 24 CFR 570.502(a)(16) - (LA4Y)US - 24 CFR 582.301 - (LA5Y) Legal consideration is permanent retention.

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
79808182838485

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CD013 Planning and Zoning
Services
Community Development
Planning and Zoning
Vital Records and information
pertaining to the activities of the planning division, including zoning.

PR Design Review
Environmental Reviews, DeterminationsGeneral Plan (Growth Management, LAFCO, Land Use Code) Land Use PermitsPlans, Project FilesPublic Use Redevelopment ResolutionsSphere of InfluenceState, Federal ReportingTribal ConsultationsWaterZoning Compliance Certificates CA - CCP 337.1 - (LA4Y)CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)CA - HSC 19850 - (LI)CA - WAT 10631 - (5Y) PD010 Missing Persons and
Runaways
Police Department Case Files PII Records, crime reports and evidence associated with missing persons and runaways.

CL+2Y National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NaMUS) CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) Case is only closed once solved ILEADS
Incident Report / Calls for Service
PD011 Officer Involved
Shootings
Police Department Case Files PII Records, crime reports and evidence associated with criminal cases dealing with officer involved shootings.

PR Case Files CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) ILEADS. Misdemeanor Crime Reports
PD012 Sealing of Adult
Records
Police Department Case Files Records of court orders to seal the records of adults.
3Y* Court Order
Petition Letter
CA - PEN 851.8 - (SEAL+3Y)CA - PEN 851.90 - (MAINT)
* From the date the records were sealed.ILEADS
Felony Crime Reports If footage isn't evidence of a crime, retention is 180 days.

PD013 Crime Reports Police Department Case Files Records, crime reports and evidence associated with stolen property.

PR Case Files. CA - CCP 338 - (3Y) * Case is only closed once solvedILEADS. Operational requirement is permanent.

Informational / Found Property Reports
PD014 Traffic Collisions -
Fatal
Police Department Case Files Records, crime reports and evidence associated with traffic collisions involving fatalities.

PR Case Files CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) Operational retention so permanent. ILEADS
Miscellaneous Records
PD015 Drugs, Gangs Police Department Criminal
Registrations
Records for those required to register as drug or gang violence offenders. 5Y Case Files CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
CA - HSC 11594(a) - (5Y)CA - PEN 186.32 - (5Y)
ILEADS Personnel Files

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
86878889

A B C DE F G H I J K L
PD016 Sex Offenders,
Arsonists
Police Department Criminal
Registrations
PII Records for those required to
register as sex offenders or arsonists.

LI* Case Files CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
CA - PEN 290(b) - (Life of Offender)CA - PEN 457.1(b)(2) - (Life of Arsonist) * LI = Life of the offender, arsonist
Background Files
PD017 Dispatch and
Communications Records
Police Department Dispatch and
Communications
PII Records of police emergency calls
and responses, to include time and date of call, contents of call, location of call, name of unit sent to scene, and other related information.

PR 911 Emergency Call Logs
Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD)Dispatch Activity LogRadio Dispatcher LogsTape Recordings CA - GOV 26202.6 - (100D)CA - GOV 34090.6 - (100D)
Operational Requirement is Permament * Exception: Recordings used as evidence in a criminal prosecution or claim filed or litigation or potential claims and litigation shall be preserved for 100 days after conclusion of the court action. Some records kept in ILEADS Internal Affairs Files
PD018 Administrative
Reporting: Police
Police Department General Reports received and/or
generated in the routine course of law enforcement activities.

CL+2Y Cost Recovery Reports CA - CCP 339 - (LA2Y)
CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
ILEADS Daily Observation
Reports
PD019 Complaints,
Investigations
Police Department Internal
Investigations
PII Documentation of complaints
received and investigations, including those by Internal Affairs, involving Police department employees (excludes officer involved shootings).

CL+5Y Citizen Complaints
Crime ReportsDepartmental Actions
CA - EVID 1045 - (AC+5Y)CA - GOV 12946 - (2Y)CA - PEN 801.5 - (4Y)CA - PEN 832.5(b) - (5Y)CA - VEH 2547 - (3Y) Confidential. Some records kept in ILEADS.

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
9091929394

A B C DE F G H I J K L
CM020 Security
Investigations
City Manager Security Confidential,
PII
Documentation regarding internal, non-police investigations related to the security of City facilities, assets, and information.

CL+10Y Internal Investigations
Investigation Logs, WorkpapersInvestigator Reports, Findings, Notes CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)US - 26 USC 6531 - (LA6Y)
Operational retention is 10 years after completion.

Commendations
PD021 Certifications Police Department Compliance Documentation regarding certifications of equipment, training of personnel
Equipment Certifications (radar guns, lidar guns, personal alcohol screening devices, in-car video surveillance devices, mobile video devices) Training Records
PW010 Building, Property
Management
Public Works/Engineering
Buildings Vital Records and information
regarding the structure of City physical buildings and facilities.

LI*+10Y Alarm System Records
As-Built BlueprintsConstruction RecordsElectrical Wiring SchematicsFloor PlansKey ListsProperty Inventory CA - CCP 337.1 - (LA4Y)CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - HSC 19850 - (LI) * LI = Life of Building, Asset Policy Manual
PW011 Maintenance
Inspection Reports
Public Works/Engineering
Buildings/Parks Reports of inspections of
maintenance performed on City facilities including buildings, parks, streets, and sidewalks. 5Y Inspections
LogsReports
CA - CCP 337 - (5Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y)
CAD (Computer Aided Dispatch)
PW012 Land and Property
Maps, Drawings
Public Works/Engineering
General Engineering
Vital Maps and geographical
information pertaining to properties within the City.

PR Aerial Photos
Assessment DistrictsAssessor Parcel MapsBuilding Site DeterminationDrainageImprovement Plans, DrawingsLand Survey MapsLot Line AdjustmentsMajor Subdivisions (SD)Minor Subdivisions (MS)ParksPlatsRecord MapsRecord of Survey MapsRedevelopmentVellums CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - GOV 34090d - (2Y)CA - HSC 19850 - (LI) Operational retention is permanent.

Registrant Records (290/Arson)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
959697

A B C DE F G H I J K L
PW013 Hazardous Waste
Monitoring and Remediation
Public Works/Engineering
Hazardous Waste
Vital Planning, monitoring and
contingency/emergency action plans for hazardous waste, emergency and spill response, natural and exposure emergencies, notifications and response; environmental action plans and supporting documentation; hazardous communications plans, including labeling, MSDS controls, training programs and procedures.

CL+30Y Electronic Waste (E-Waste)
Emergency Response ProgramsEmployee Hazardous Chemical ExposureHazardous Material Incident ReportsHazardous Substances Shipping ManifestsHazardous WasteMaterial Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)Proposition 65 MonitoringRadiation Exposure RecordsRadioactive MaterialsSite MitigationToxic Substance Inventory CA - CalOSHACA - CCP 338.1 - (LA5Y)CA - 8 CCR 3204d - (CL+30Y)CA - 17 CCR 30293(1) - (3Y)CA - 22 CCR 66262.40 - (3Y)CA - 22 CCR 66263.22 - (3Y)US - 29 CFR 1910.1020 - (CL+30Y)US - 29 CFR 1910.1025 - (CL+20Y)US - 29 CFR 1910.1050 - (CL+30Y)US - 40 CFR 268.7 - (3Y)US - 40 CFR 270 - (3Y)US - 49 CFR 172.201 - (3Y)US - 49 CFR 177.817 - (3Y) Citations
PW014 Public Works Project
Administration
Public Works/Engineering
Projects Records and information
associated with the administration of public works, capital improvement and engineering projects.

CL+10Y Certified Payrolls
Construction Manager's LogsDaily InspectionsFacilities ProjectsField InspectionsProject SchedulesProgress MeetingsReal Estate AppraisalsRFIs & Responses CA - CCP 337.1 - (LA4Y)CA - CCP 337.15 - (LA10Y)CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) Sealed Records
PW015 Traffic and
Transportation Planning
Public Works/Engineering
Streets Records and information of traffic
engineering and transportation planning activities, including studies and surveys. 5Y School-related Studies/Surveys
Speed SurveysStreet SweepingStreet/Highway Studies/SurveysTraffic Calming RequestsTraffic CountsTransportation Planning CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) Operational retention is five
years
Evidence.com (BWC/Dash Cam/ALPR)

CITY OF COTATI
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 2024
9899
100101102103104105

A B C DE F G H I J K L
PW016 Traffic Control and
Improvement
Public Works/Engineering
Streets Records and information related
to the City's efforts to manage and improve traffic and circulation. 2Y Bicycles
EnforcementHighway CorridorsImpact StudiesPavement Management PlanSignalsSignsTemporary Street Closures CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) JEI (Phone/Radio
recordings)
PW017 Transportation
Program Services
Public Works/Engineering
Streets Records and information related
to the City's efforts to provide effective methods by which people and materials move through the City. 2Y Alternative Transportation Demand / Transportation Demand ManagementTransportation Systems Management (TDM) / Alternative Modes / Bicycle CA - GOV 34090 - (2Y) Evaluations
PW018 Sewer, Water, Storm
Water
Public Works/Engineering
Water/Air Management
Records and information associated with planning and maintenance of sewers, water, and storm water CL+5Y Backflow Prevention - Water
Diversion GoalsEnvironmental ConservationEnvironmental ProgramsFlood Control - Storm WaterMeter Inventory - Sewer, WaterNPDES (Engineering)- Sewer, Water, StormwaterPipe InventoryPollution Control PermitsStorm Water Monitoring - Storm WaterStorm Water Pollution Permits - Storm WaterWater Agency Information - WaterWater Runoff Testing - WaterWeight TicketsMaster Plan CA - CCP 338 - (LA3Y)CA - CCP 338.1 - (LA5Y)CA - CAL OSHAUS - 40 CFR 122.21 - (3Y)US - 40 CFR 122.41 - (3Y)US - 40 CFR 141.155 - (3Y)US - 40 CFR 261.32 - (3Y) Traffic related certifications/calibrationsGrantsFirearms/Range recordsHolding Cell Audits/LogsPAS/PEBT CalibrationsAlarm Permits Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE ROOFING REPAIR AND

REPLACEMENT CONSULTATION FOR THE POLICE
STATION, SUNFLOWER PARK RESTROOM, AND WELL 2
Date: May 13, 2025
Written by: Craig Scott, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Recommendation
It is recommended the City Council of the City of Cotati approve by motion the proposal by Interactive Resources to provide roofing repair and replacement consultation professional services for the Police Station, Sunflower Park Restroom, and Well 2 and authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement for said services.

Background
The City owns and maintains public buildings and the maintenance includes making any needed repairs or replacements to roofs.

Analysis/Discussion
102 of 539
Over this past winter, the Police Building experienced a large number of leaks and Public Works were called out each time and did their best to track the source of the leaks and made spot repairs. However, the leaks persisted, and Staff determined the services of a roofing specialist were needed to determine if the roof was to be repaired or replaced. A repair could be cost effective if the roof is failing in a specific area, such as the skylights, and potentially extend the roof’s life for a decade or more at much lower cost. However, if the roof is determined to have extensive deficiencies and has reached the end of its useful life, then a full roof replacement may be necessary. Staff have included the Sunflower Park restroom and Well 2 roofs in the scope of services because these roofs are at the end of their useful lives.

Interactive Resources has provided roof evaluation and design services for the City and is uniquely qualified to perform these services due to their familiarity with the City’s building infrastructure. City Staff requested and Interactive Resources (IR) provided a proposal for roofing repair and replacement consultation services for the Police Building, Sunflower Park Restroom, and Well 2 roofs. Specifically, IR is to perform a roof assessment focusing on the potential skylight deficiencies as well as other potential deficiencies in the Police Building, prepare bid documents, assist in the bidding and construction phases. For the Sunflower Restroom roof, IR is making recommendations regarding the type of roofing system including gutters and providing assistance during the construction. Finally, IR is to assess and provide recommendations for replacement of the Well 2 roof and provide assistance during construction.

Staff has reviewed the proposal and find it to be fair and reasonable and recommend it for approval.

Financial Considerations
The City’s FY24/25 Adopted budget did not anticipate funding for a roofing assessment and, therefore, a budget appropriation from the City’s unappropriated General Fund is being requested for $26,462 for the Police Building portion of the Roof Repair and Replacement Consulting Services proposed Agreement. Adequate funding is within the Parks and Water accounts for the $1,250 and $1,550, portions, respectively. Construction costs have been anticipated and are accounted for in the proposed FY25-26 City Budget within the Buildings ReRoofing Project and a separate Water Fund Operations and Maintenance Project. If the assessment finds that a repair of the Police Building roof will extend the life, it is anticipated that the actual construction costs for the Police Building will be significantly less than the budget.

Environmental Issues
This action is found to qualify for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption under CEQA Section 15301 in that the project consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of the existing or former use. 103 of 539
1 | Page
   
117 Park Place
Richmond, CA 94801
510.236.7435 t
510.232.5325 f
i n t r e s . c o m
   
Main Point of Contact/
Principal /
Lead Architect:

Edward Anisman, AIA,

NCARB, LEED AP
510.236.7435, x152
[email protected]
   
April 22, 2025
Craig Scott
Director / City Engineer
City of Cotati: Public Works & Engineering
201 W Sierra Ave,
Cotati, CA 94931
Subject: City of Cotati – Roof Repair and Replacement Consultation Dear Mr. Scott:

We are pleased to submit our proposal for the roof repair and consultation projects for the Civic Center, Sunflower Park Restroom, and Ladybug Park Pump house Our firm has a demonstrated history of successfully delivering complex roofing projects across a diverse range of building types, including civic and infrastructure facilities. With extensive expertise in roofing systems, waterproofing, and remedial work, our team of experienced architects and engineers is committed to providing innovative, sustainable, and tailored roofing solutions that address the specific requirements of each project.

PART I – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE

0. General: Project Description and Program: All projects will generally include:
• Expedited Project Delivery: In order to assist the city in bidding the projects for construction in summer 2025, the deliverables will focus on input required to appropriately bid the projects.
• Separate Projects: Fees given for each of the three separate projects are stand-alone. Bid Documents developed for each of the three projects are also be stand-alone.
• Options and Additional Services: As a result of the base scope of work described below, additional options and/or recommendations may develop that go beyond the base of work. We will advise the city of these options – along with a fee proposal where appropriate – before proceeding.
• Information Provided by Client: We request that the city provide as-built drawings of Cotati Police Department and other buildings if available.

1. Cotati Police Department Roof (Civic Center)
203 W Sierra Ave, Cotati, CA 94931
The scope of work for the Police Department roof consists of a roof assessment focusing on potential skylight and/or skylight flashing deficiencies as well as other potential points of water penetration into the building. 104 of 539
2 | Page
The Cotati Police Department building is approximately 15-18 years old.

The steep composition shingle roof is reportedly the original roof. The warranty for the existing roof system is approximately 25-30 years (subject to confirmation with city records). The roof has virtually no penetrations other than the skylights and isolated vents. Attic space contains mechanical equipment and ducting. The suspended acoustical ceilings provide access to viewing the attic space above. Walls are gypsum wallboard.

Although the field of the roof appears to be in good condition and likely to have an additional 10+ years of service life, there have been continuous water penetration issues since the structure’s original construction, reportedly related to the poorly flashed skylight penetrations (two small skylights plus a single, long ridge skylight). Numerous repair attempts have not resolved the issue.

Interior damage from water entry includes wall and ceiling stains in the corridor and adjoining administration and exercise rooms. These locations are either 1) directly under the skylights or 2) reached from an unknown point of entry via structural members or ducting.

Specific tasks include – but are not limited to – the following:

Investigative Phase
• Roof Assessment and Investigation: This phase will include visual observations of the roof and destructive testing at the skylights as required to determine construction and assess potential sources of water penetration. (All destructive testing will be made watertight before leaving the site.)
• Findings: Prepare a brief report of findings, including recommendations for repair of deficiencies.

Note: As noted in Options and Additional Services, above, findings may include recommendations for work not included in this base scope of work that develop through the assessment and investigation phase. We will advise the city of these options – along with a fee proposal where appropriate – before proceeding. • Documentation: Prepare Bid Documents with specification sections and/or drawings as required to bid purposes.

Bid Phase
• Attend Bid Walk, respond to Requests for Information (RFIs); assist in in reviewing Bids.

Construction Phase
• In addition to reviewing submittals and responding to RFIs, attend preconstruction meeting, two (2) progress site visits, and a punch walk.

2. Sunflower Park Restroom Roof
East Cotati Ave at Sunflower Drive, Cotati, CA 94931
The primary scope of work for this building is to replace the roof and gutters that have exceeded their expected service life.
105 of 539
3 | Page
As this is a fairly straightforward project, our services will be limited as follows:
• Assessment and Recommendations: Visit the site and make specific recommendations regarding the type of roofing system to be specified, including both roofing materials and gutters.
• Bid Phase: Attend a bid walk in conjunction with Project 1Bid Walk.

Note: A separate bid walk will be considered an extra service. • Construction Phase: We will be available for consultation during construction.

3. Well 2 Roof
Accessed from Lakewood Ave and adjoining Ladybug Park
The primary scope of work for this building is to replace the roofs (both steep and low-slope area) and gutters that have exceeded their expected service life.

As this is a fairly straightforward project, our services will be limited as follows:
• Assessment and Recommendations: Visit the site and make specific recommendations regarding the type of roofing system to be specified, including both roofing materials and gutters.
• Bid Phase: Attend a bid walk in conjunction with Project 1Bid Walk.

Note: A separate bid walk will be considered an extra service. • Construction Phase: We will be available for consultation during construction.

PART II – PROJECT SCHEDULE

1. Project Schedule:
• Assessment and Consultation Phase: April/May 2025
• Bid Phase: May/June 2025
• Construction Phase: Summer 2025

PART III – FEE PROPOSAL

1. Compensation:
a. Base Fee: Compensation will be on a Lump Sum Basis in the amount of indicated below for the three separate projects. Invoices will be sent separately for each project on a monthly basis, in an amount based on work completed to date.

106 of 539
4 | Page
Fee Summary Table ($)

b. Reimbursable Expenses: Estimated reimbursable charges for this project are primarily anticipated to be travel to the site. Reimbursable expenses are in addition to hourly fees.

Reimbursable expenses also include such items as postage, reproduction, CAD drawing plotting, printing, special materials or equipment, storage of investigative samples or forensic evidence, and travel at the IRS standard mileage rate of $0.70 cents per mile.

Reprographics – half size (15”x21”) $1.60; Reprographics – full size (30”x42”) $3.19; CD $5.00.
c. Additional Services: Services provided beyond the stated scope will be billed hourly at the rates shown as per the Exhibit B – Standard Rage Schedule.

Execution:

A copy of this Proposal signed and returned to IR will constitute our engagement agreement.

Section 5536.22 and 6749 of the Business and Professions Code requires architects and engineers to use a written contract when providing professional services to a client. In order to be in compliance with the law, it is imperative that this agreement be executed prior to any services being provided.

By integrating this proposal into the master agreement as an amendment, the Client shall acknowledge IR’s proposed scope and conditions that apply to the scope of work and compensation. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Name: Andrew Butt, AIA Date
Title: Managing Principal

Item Project Fee DT Reimb Sutotal
1 Cotati Police Department
Roof - Investigation &
Repair (includes DT
Contractor)
21,500 4,612 350 26,462
2 Sunflower Park Restroom
Roof - Consultation
1,200 50 1,250
3 Well 2 Roof - Consultation 1,500 50 1,550
TOTAL 24,200 4,612 450 29,262
107 of 539
5 | Page

EXHIBITS
A. Subconsultant Proposal - Enterprise Roofing Service, Inc: Proposal for Destructive Testing dated Aprill 17, 2025.

A. Standard Rate Schedule
108 of 539
Delivery address: 2400 Bates Ave. Concord, CA 94520
P.O. Box 5130 Concord, CA 94524-0130
Phone (925) 689-8100 Fax (925) 825-5027
California License # 221274
Public Works Registration # 1000000444
Armando D. Garcia Estimator/Project Manager [email protected]

BUILT-UP ROOF PATCHING
All roof plywood deck removal.

EXCLUSIONS
All roof inspections.
make watertight repairs.

Destructive testing as required to determine existing construction causation of water penetration; make watertight repairs.

All bonds and permits.
$4,080
One (1) mobilization.
17-Apr BID PROPOSAL
Attn: Edward Anisman Interactive Resources 117 Park Place Richmond, CA 94801 The undersigned agrees to furnish and provide necessary labor, materials, tools, implements, and appliances to do, perform and complete in a good workmanlike manner the following.

JOB NAME AND ADDRESS: Cotati Police Department (Civic Center) 203 W Sierra Ave, Cotati, CA 94931 Respectfully submitted by ENTERPRISE ROOFING SERVICE, INC.

Armando D. Garcia

BASE BID TOTAL
Void this proposal after 30 days.

INSTALLED TAX INCLUDED PER PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
All lead and asbestos containing material.

All rough carpentry; all wood, all wood nailers, all blocking.

All temporary weather protection; all temporary/emergency roofing All sheet metal flashing and trim, all counter flashings, reglets, all vent pipe flashings, all valley metal, all cap at top of parapet, All copper flashing, all galvanized caps metal coping.

Assist in observations of the suspect skylight flashings A photo report with description that were performed will be provide.

All debris caused by our work will be removed from the job site on a daily basis. www.enterpriseroofing.com Page 1 of 1 Telephone # (925) 689-8100 109 of 539
117 Park Place, Point Richmond, CA 94801 | Tel: 510.236.7435 | Fax: 510.232.5325 | www.intres.com 1 Standard Rate Schedule
Exhibit A
Title Per Hour
President/Sr. Project Manager 263.00
Managing Principal/Sr. Project Manager 239.00
Associate Principal/Sr. Project Manager 227.00
Project Manager 215.00
Senior Structural Engineer 215.00
Historic Preservation Architect/Historian 196.00
Senior Project Designer/Drafter 189.00
Designer Drafter 153.00
Technical Support 146.00
Rates are subject to change as employees receive salary modifications. *Interactive Resources may opt to utilize contract employees for peak loads Last revision August 1, 2022 Exhibit B
110 of 539
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH HARRIS AND ASSOCIATES TO DESIGN THE 2026

PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROJECT
Date: May 13, 2025
Written by: Craig Scott, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a professional services agreement with Harris and Associates to design the 2026 Pavement Preservation Project and authorizing the City Manager to execute said agreement.

Background
This item is to seek Council approval of a design contract for completion of a street preservation maintenance construction project in late summer of 2025. The Project follows the recommendations of the City’s Pavement Management Program and is consistent with its recently adopted Capital Improvement Plan. The City is committed to investing in its roadway infrastructure and the investment includes both higher cost rebuilding streets in poor condition as well as lower cost slurry (i.e. street preservation) of streets in good condition. Every summer for the past several years, the City has completed street pavement preservation and rehabilitation projects and has significantly improved the overall condition of its streets to now among the best in Sonoma County. However, sustained investment is necessary to preserve the conditions of the roadways.

Analysis/Discussion
111 of 539
The 2026 Pavement Preservation Project (Project) is included in the City’s adopted FY24/25 Budget for design and the FY26-28 Two-Year proposed budget for construction in FY26. In August 2024, the City Engineering Division issued a request for qualifications, reviewed the qualifications, and City Staff determined Harris and Associates to be the most qualified for the design of street preservation and rehabilitation projects. The City requested, and Harris and Associates has provided, a proposal to prepare construction plans and specifications and bidding services for the City to contract for construction in late summer 2025. City Staff have reviewed the proposal and find it to be fair and reasonable. The streets identified for preservation treatments are informed by the recently completed Pavement Management Program.

Financial Considerations
The proposal from Harris and Associates is $90,015. The City’s adopted FY24/25 Annual Budget includes $60,000 for design in FY24/25 and with $30,000 for design projected for FY25/26. The proposed services present a timeline with the design funds being spent within FY24/25 net the design services during construction of $15,745. Therefore, a budget amendment is requested to move $14,270 forward from FY25/26 into FY24/25 to reach the design fee of $90,015 – $15,745 = $74,270. The remaining $14,270 would not be spent until after July 1, 2025. The City’s proposed FY26-28 Two Year Budget includes $1.065 million for construction and construction management.

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF COTATI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS AND ASSOCIATES TO DESIGN THE FY 2026 PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROJECT AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT.

WHEREAS, the FY 2026 Pavement Preservation Project (Project) follows the recommendations of the City’s Pavement Management Program and is consistent with its recently adopted Annual and Multi-Year Capital Plans; and WHEREAS, the City is committed to investing in its roadway infrastructure and the investment includes both higher cost street reconstruction for streets in poor condition as well as lower cost slurry (i.e. street preservation) of streets in good condition; and WHEREAS, every summer for the past several years, the City has completed street pavement preservation and rehabilitation projects and has significantly improved the overall condition of its street to now among the best in Sonoma County; and WHEREAS, the Project is included in the City’s adopted FY24/25 Budget, and, in August 2024, the City Engineering Division issued a request for qualifications, reviewed the qualifications, and City Staff determined Harris and Associates to be the most qualified for the design of street preservation and rehabilitation design projects; and WHEREAS, the City requested, and Harris and Associates has provided, a proposal to prepare construction plans and specifications and bidding services for the City to contract with a construction company for construction in late summer 2025; and WHEREAS, City Staff have reviewed the proposal and find it to be fair and reasonable and Staff recommends it for approval; and
WHEREAS, the Project’s preliminary schedule is to advertise for bids in June 2025 with construction to start in late summer 2025; and
WHEREAS, a budget amendment is requested for $14,270 to be advanced to FY24/25 for design services with the understanding the balance of the design agreement of $15,745 (and the construction expenses) is to come from the anticipated FY25/26 budget for the Project; and WHEREAS, the action of approving the design agreement is found to qualify for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption under CEQA Section 15301 in that the project consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of the existing or former use.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Cotati hereby determines that:
113 of 539

1. The recital above are true and correct, and

2. The proposal from Harris and Associates to design, provide bidding services, and design services through construction, for an amount of $90,015, is approved, and

3. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute said agreement.

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cotati held on May 13, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

Approved:___________________________
Mayor
Attest:______________________________
Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to form:______________________________
City Attorney
114 of 539
1401 Willow Pass Road Suite 500 Concord, CA 94520-7964 925.827.4900 f.866.356.0998 weareharris.com (Email to [email protected])
Date: April 22, 2025
Craig Scott
DPW/City Engineer
City of Cotati
201 West Sierra Avenue
Cotati, CA 94931
Engineering Design Services for the
2026 Pavement Preservation Project
Dear Craig:

Harris & Associates (Harris) is pleased to present this proposal for civil engineering design services for the 2026 Pavement Preservation Project as requested. The following will present an outline of our proposed scope of services. We have provided a Scope of Work Matrix in Attachment A. It is our intent that this outline provides enough detail, so our approach is clearly defined. It should be noted that this scope is based on the latest 5 Year Paving CIP Update for FY25/26 to FY30/31, corresponding with City Staff and our understanding of the project schedule (to be constructed in August 2025).

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
This project will include the preservation streets listed in YR 2026 and YR 2027 of the current 5 Yr CIP Paving Update (dated 3/13/25).

YR 2026 estimated construction cost = $541,114
YR 2027 estimated construction cost = $595,834
Grand total for both years = $1.15M which is slightly above the anticipated construction budget = $1.125M.

There are twenty-two (22) street segments that will receive slurry seal, crack seal, and base repairs (dig outs) as part of the preventative maintenance program. Fieldwork will be performed, and PS&E documents will be developed.

The following streets will be included in the project limits with approximate costs per the latest 5 Year Paving CIP Update for FY25/26 to FY30/31:
115 of 539
1401 Willow Pass Road Suite 500 Concord, CA 94520-7964 925.827.4900 f.866.356.0998 weareharris.com Street Name Begin End Length
(LF) Treatment Approx. Cost
FY2026 Slurry Seal
Arthur St East Sierra E Cotati Ave 600
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$26,970
East Cotati Ave Baytree Ct Beverly Dr 1092
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$122,541
East Cotati Ave Beverly Dr RR Tracks 1173
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$131,631
East Cotati Ave RR Tracks City Limits 679
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$76,195
Fehler Lane Valparaiso Ave Jagla St 807
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$28,339
Jagla St Fehler Lane Valparaiso Ave 1,180
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$56,355
Olaf St West Sierra Ave William 589
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$28,130
Santero Way East Cotati Ave 750ft South of
East Cotati Ave 750
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$37,925
Santero Way 750ft South of
East Cotati Ave
1575ft South of
East Cotati Ave 825
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$33,027
Subtotal FY2026 Slurry Seal 7,695 LF $541,114
FY2027 Slurry Seal
Benson Ln Bridge Loretto Ave 160
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$5,428
Lakewood Ave Lincoln Ave La Salle Ave 1800
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$87,609
Larch Ave Lincoln Ave La Salle Ave 1,425
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$69,357
La Salle Ave East Cotati Ave Larkspur Ct 1,000
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$63,183
116 of 539
1401 Willow Pass Road Suite 500 Concord, CA 94520-7964 925.827.4900 f.866.356.0998 weareharris.com Street Name Begin End Length
(LF) Treatment Approx. Cost
La Salle Ave Larkspur Ct Loretto Ave 980
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$61,919
Lincoln Ave Loretto Ave La Salle Ave 840
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$45,840
Lincoln Ave La Salle Ave City Limits 884
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$48,241
Linden Ave Lincoln Ave Larch Ave 722
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$35,141
Linden Ct Linden Ave End 285
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$13,871
Loretto Ave Benson Ln Lincoln Ave 741
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$36,066
Loretto Ave Benson Ln La Salle Ave 970
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$47,212
ORH William West Sierra Ave 800
Dig Out 10%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$81,967
Larkspur Ct La Salle Ave End 180
Dig Out 20%,
Crack Seal,
Slurry Seal
$12,845
Subtotal FY2027 Slurry Seal 10,787 LF $608,680
TOTAL 18,482 LF $1,149,793
We have generated a map of the listed streets above. See Exhibit 1 The city’s total construction budget is $1.125M. The above costs include 10% Design fee, 10% Construction fee, and 15% Contingency.

PROJECT SCHEDULE
The tentative design schedule is shown below:
• May 1, 2025 – NTP (tentative)
• May 5, 2025 to May 9, 2025 – Fieldwork
117 of 539
1401 Willow Pass Road Suite 500 Concord, CA 94520-7964 925.827.4900 f.866.356.0998 weareharris.com • May 5, 2025 to May 9, 2025 – Fieldwork
• May 12, 2025 to May 30, 2025 – Prepare/Submit 90% PS&E • June 2, 2025 to June 6, 2025 – City review
• June 9, 2025 to June 13, 2025– Prepare/Submit Final PS&E • June 16, 2025 to July 7, 2025 – Advertising period (21 days) • July 8, 2025 – Council Approval to Construct / Award
• July 21, 2025 – Construction start
The design work will be completed by June 13, 2025 to award by July 8, 2025. The schedule assumes 5 working days for City review of Harris deliverables. Harris will not be responsible for delays to the project schedule beyond sole control. The desired timeframe for slurry seal installation is between May and mid-October (70 degrees and rising).

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
The 90% and Final PS&E documents will include specifications, cost estimate and a set of fullsize plans in pdf format. The full-size plans will comprise of:
• Title Sheet
• Key Map that will show the treated streets (Slurry/Crack Seal) • Detail Sheet
• Detailed spreadsheet showing dig outs and quantity takeoff for each street segment We will also keep a record of the digout locations painted on the streets as part of our field investigation notes in case the contractor requests a copy of them during construction.

PROPOSED FEE
Please see the attached fee proposal for Harris’ level of effort (Attachment B) to execute the scope of work. The proposed fee is in the not-to-exceed total amount of $90,015. Attention is directed to the assumptions attached to this fee proposal, indicating inclusions and exclusions in developing our fee basis.

Once we receive the Notice to Proceed, the design process will begin immediately to open bids and award in late July 2025.

Please contact Luella Gabriel (925-969-8140) or Elizabeth Reyes (949-536-2516) if you have any questions regarding our proposal. We look forward to working with you again. 118 of 539
1401 Willow Pass Road Suite 500 Concord, CA 94520-7964 925.827.4900 f.866.356.0998 weareharris.com Sincerely,
Harris & Associates
Luella Gabriel Elizabeth Reyes, PE, PMP, QSD
Project Manager Sr. Project Manager
Enclosures: Exhibit 1 – 2026 Project Limits Map
Attachment A: Scope of Work Matrix
Attachment B: Fee Proposal and Assumptions
119 of 539

Page 1 ends

City of Cotati
2026 Pavement Preservation Project

TASK OUR APPROACH DELIVERABLE
00 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

0.1 Progress Meetings Monthly meetings with City staff and others as appropriate throughout design process.

Notes of each meeting
highlighting agreedupon action items.

0.2 Progress Report A brief progress report will accompany each monthly Harris invoice. It will discuss budget and schedule status, issues resolved and unresolved, and “next steps”.

Monthly status report.

0.3 Project Management Tasks Project setup, budgeting, scheduling and internal meetings to ensure project is running smoothly.

1.0 INVESTIGATION PHASE

1.1 Kick-off Meeting We will meet with staff to confirm the scope of work, schedule, budget, and availability of project documents; review project goals and conceptual designs; discuss the format of deliverables; and clarify responsibilities of each party.

Meeting notes with lists,
as appropriate.

1.2 Data Collection We will conduct an inventory of street data such as width, length, striping, etc. and prepare field exhibits for field investigation.

Spreadsheet showing
data for each street.

1.3 Field Investigation A team of two Harris staff will walk each of the project streets to locate and measure digouts, take inventory of existing utility covers, identify striping, and confirm project limits.

Field notes of digout
locations will be
available for the
contractor, if requested.
120 of 539

Page 2 ends

City of Cotati
2026 Pavement Preservation Project

TASK OUR APPROACH DELIVERABLE

2.0 FINAL DESIGN PHASE

2.1 Design Plans (90%) We will submit a 90% package for review and comment by City and others.

Final design will not proceed until the 90% package is approved by the City.

Preliminary area map,
plans, spreadsheet, and
standard striping
details.

2.2 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (90%) A 90% opinion of probable cost will be provided. We will utilize the resources of our expert design and construction management staff to provide current, realistic construction costs.

Preliminary itemized
cost estimate,
segregated by street if
required by the City.

2.3 Specifications and Contract Documents (90%) At the 90% stage, we will prepare technical specifications for review and comment by City staff. Specifications will be based upon City and Caltrans standard documents.

Draft special provisions
(technical specs) at the
90 percent stage.

2.4 Quality review (90%) Prior to the 90% submittal, all plans and documents will be reviewed by Harris’ Quality Manager. Quality review ensures document accuracy and completeness, and reduces necessary City review time
N/A

2.5 Review Meeting (1 meeting) At a meeting with City staff, we will discuss our 90% design package. Meeting notes.

2.6 Final Contract Documents (PS&E) After staff reviews and comments on the final draft documents, we will revise as needed and resubmit PDFs of contract documents for bidding by the City. A final, detailed engineer’s estimate of probable construction cost will be provided.

Contract documents in
PDF format.

3.0 BID PERIOD SERVICES

3.1 Attend Pre-Bid Meeting We will attend a pre-bid meeting scheduled by the City to answer questions from prospective bidders.

Meeting notes,
including a list of
questions asked. 121 of 539

Page 3 ends

City of Cotati
2026 Pavement Preservation Project

TASK OUR APPROACH DELIVERABLE

3.2 Answer Bidders Questions We will answer questions from bidders by telephone during the advertising period. We will log questions and provide City with documentation.

Log of questions
received, and answers
given, for City to
distribute if appropriate.

3.3 Prepare Addenda (assume 2) We will prepare any required addenda for distribution by the City. Addenda to bid package.

4.0 DESIGN SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION

4.1 Attend Construction Kick-off Meeting We will attend the meeting and answer any questions from the CM and contractor
Meeting minutes

4.2 Attend Construction Meetings (up to 4) We will attend weekly construction meetings if requested to answer field questions from the contractor
Meeting minutes

4.3 Respond to RFI’s (assume 4) We will respond to RFI’s sent from the CM to answer contractor questions and make recommendations to the City.

RFI responses
uploaded through CM
construction software

4.4 Review Contractor Submittals (assume 6) We will review all contractor submittals and make recommendations to the City.

Submittal Reviews
uploaded through CM
construction software

4.5 Change Order Assistance (assume 2) We will provide the City with the necessary documentation for change order processing.

Written response and
recommendation for
each change order.

4.6 Site visits (up to 2) Harris team will visit the site when requested and at during punchlist walk Punchlist items checklist

4.7 Prepare Record Drawings Once Harris receives Asbuilt markups from the CM we will update the Final set of plans and perform an internal QC and add Record Drawing stamp.

Submit Record
Drawings in PDF format
122 of 539
McGinnis Cir
Silver
Dr
Cotati
Oaks
Ct
Gilman Ranch Rd
Meadowbrook Ct
S Hwy 101
N
Hwy
101
Kingston
Ln
Sunflower
Dr
Oak
Cir
Ryan Ln
Dino Ct
Myrtle Ave
Revard
Ct
Primero
Ct
Matteri Cir
Blodgett
St
Lancaster Dr
S
Hwy
101
Skilling Ct
Cotati Ave
School St
Park
Ave
Lakewood Ave
Veronda Ave
Loma Linda Dr
Christensen
Ct
Houser St
Sierra Ave
Cotati Ave
S Hwy 116
Aaron St
Ford Ln
Lasker Ln
Lincoln Ave
Village Ct
Manor Ct
Lund
Hill
Ln
Cypress Ave
Sycamore Ln
Helman Ln
Lebec Ln
Wilford Ln
Cotati Ave
Maple Ave
Portal St
Locust Ave
Chadwick
Grove
Way
St
Eucalyptus Ave
Breen Way
Redwood Dr
Nb
Hwy
116
Offramp
Tracks
Richardson Ln
Trebino Ct
Nelson Ln
Madrone Ave
Scenario Years by Treatment
2024-5yr CIP_3-12-25 - All Treatments - Printed: 3/13/2025

CITY OF COTATI
123 of 539

ESTIMATED LEVEL OF EFFORT
CITY OF COTATI DATE:4/22/25
2026 Pavement Preservation Project ATTACHMENT B

PHASE, TASK PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT DESIGN

DIR MGR ENGR ENGR

0.0 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION PHASE

0.1 Progress Meetings (6 mtgs) 8 $2,120

0.2 Progress Reports (6 reports) 6 $1,590

0.3 Project Management Tasks 0.5 24 8 2 $8,400
SUBTOTAL HOURS 0.5 0 38 8 2 $12,110

1.0 INVESTIGATION PHASE

1.1 Kick-off Meeting 2 1 2 $1,020

1.2 Data Collection 1 8 16 $4,185

1.3 Field Investigation 40 40 $13,800
SUBTOTAL HOURS 0 0 3 49 58 $19,005

2.0 FINAL DESIGN PHASE

2.1 Design Plans (90%) 8 30 50 $15,370

2.2 Estimate of Probable Construction Cost (90%) 1 16 8 $4,625

2.3 Specifications and Contract Documents (90%) 4 10 $3,060

2.4 Quality Review (90%) 8 $2,320

2.5 Review Meeting (1 Mtg) 2 $530

2.6 Final Contract Documents 0.5 4 2 20 30 $10,190
SUBTOTAL HOURS 0.5 12 17 76 88 $36,095

3.0 BID PERIOD SERVICES

3.1 Attend Pre-Bid Meeting 2 2 $930

3.2 Answer Bidder's Questions 8 4 $2,920

3.3 Prepare Addenda (assume 2) 8 4 2 $3,210
SUBTOTAL HOURS 0 0 18 10 2 $7,060

4.0 DESIGN SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION

4.1 Attend Construction Kick-off Meeting 2 2 $930

4.2 Attend construction meetings (up to 4) 0.5 4 2 $1,610

4.3 Respond to RFI's (assume 4) 8 4 $2,920

4.4 Review Contractor Submittals (assume 6) 8 4 $2,920

4.5 Change Order Assistance 8 4 4 $3,500

4.6 Site Visits (up to 2) 4 4 $1,860

4.7 Prepare Record Drawings 2 1 8 $2,005
SUBTOTAL HOURS 0.5 2 35 20 12 $15,745
HOURS PER POSITION 2 14 111 163 162
HOURLY RATE (TYPICAL) $300 $290 $265 $200 $145
FEE ESTIMATE PER POSITION $450 $4,060 $29,415 $32,600 $23,490 PROJECT TOTAL $90,015
ASSUMPTIONS UPON WHICH LEVEL OF EFFORT ESTIMATE IS BASED:

1. 2. Hourly rates shown are averages. Actual rates for positions may vary slightly.

3. Hours and fee for individual tasks are a guide; the total hours and cost for the project takes precedence.

4. Hours and fee may be renegotiated if the project is delayed by factors beyond Harris' control.

5. 6. City will provide the following:
-Access to any available drawings or information relevant to the project. -Final "front-end" documents.
-Printing of PS&E set for bid advertisement and construction. -Notify utility agencies

7. We assume a construction cost estimate of approximately $1.125M which includes Design(10%) and CM (10%) services + 15% Cont.

8. The number of budgeted meetings is indicated.

9. 10. No utility mapping will be required.

11. No public meetings or Council presentations will be required.

12. No topography surveys will be required.

13. Fee assumes design completion in year 2025.

14. Slurry treated sheets will be identified in a key map and detailed spreadsheets will be developed to reflect the quantity takeoff for each street segment.

Hourly rates shown include all indirect costs, including travel time, mileage, miscellaneous reproduction and copying costs, mailings and delivery costs.

HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
TOTAL
QA/QC

HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
Harris will identify and quantity all base failure areas. A spreadsheet will be developed for the base repair areas and inserted into the plans. The base repair locations will not be delineated on the plans but field notes will be available upon request.

BASE SERVICES
City comments at each review stage will be presented to Harris promptly and on one consolidated set of marked-up documents. p. 1 of 1
124 of 539
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 564 TO

HALT THE STATE EXCISE TAX INCREASE ON CANNABIS
Date: May 13, 2025
Written by: Damien O'Bid, City Manager
Recommendation
It is recommended the City Council adopt a resolution supporting State Assembly Bill 564, which would halt the scheduled increase in the State excise tax on cannabis.

Background
Due to prior legislative actions (AB 195), the State removed the tax on cannabis cultivation with a change in statute that was to shift the lost revenue to an increased excise tax on retailers, not to exceed 19%. That cultivation tax accounted for more than $166 million in state revenue in 2021, according to the California Department of Taxation and Fee Administration (CDTFA).

Increasing the cannabis excise tax at retail an additional four percentage points would generate roughly that same amount under current market conditions.

The current State excise tax on retailers is 15%. To make up the lost revenue from cultivation, the retailer excise tax is scheduled to increase to 19% on July 1, 2025.

Analysis/Discussion
The cannabis industry, as has been widely reported, expanded rapidly upon legalization and then began to rapidly contract with closures and bankruptcies due to a combination of speculative investments that were unsound, high taxes, high operating costs due to banking and other tax restrictions due to cannabis being illegal federally and finally competition from the black market that can undercut the legal market on cost. While there are many contributing factors, AB 564 attempts to tackle one of these elements - stabilize the state excise tax at the current rate.

Attached is an overview of the state of the cannabis market, outlining the history as well as the 125 of 539
relative taxation of cannabis. The article also references the groups that petitioned the state to reverse the changes under AB 195 and begin taxing cultivation again.

Cal Cities has a ”watch” position on AB 564.

Financial Considerations
If the state excise tax increases from 15% to 19%, it will likely result in some reduction in sales at our two cannabis dispensaries. While Cotati has among the lowest local taxes in the State, this, in turn, could reduce general fund revenue collected by the 3% cannabis business tax, as well as the 1% Bradley Burns sales tax and 1% Measure S use tax.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI URGING

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO HALT THE SCHEDULED CANNABIS EXCISE

TAX INCREASE
WHEREAS, California voters approved Proposition 64 in 2016 to legalize, regulate, and tax cannabis sales in order to establish a safe, controlled, and equitable marketplace while eliminating the illicit market; and
WHEREAS, the legal cannabis industry in California has faced increasing economic and regulatory challenges, including excessive taxation, burdensome compliance costs, and competition from unlicensed operators who evade state oversight and taxation; and WHEREAS, the scheduled increase in the state cannabis excise tax from 15% to 19% on July 1, 2025, as mandated by AB 195 (Budget Committee, 2022), threatens to further destabilize the legal cannabis industry by increasing prices, reducing legal sales, and pushing more consumers into the unregulated market; and
WHEREAS, since 2021, California’s legal cannabis market has experienced a 19% decline in annual sales and a 13% drop in state excise tax revenue, with projections for FY 2025- 26 revenue unlikely to meet state estimates due to market contraction; and WHEREAS, the number of inactive or surrendered cannabis licenses in California now exceeds active licenses, with 10,828 inactive licenses compared to 8,514 active licenses, as reported in February 2025 by SFGATE, demonstrating a declining market that is forcing businesses to shut down or consolidate; and
WHEREAS, the impact of high taxation and unlicensed competition has led to significant job losses, with nearly 5,000 cannabis jobs lost in 2023 alone, following 12,600 job losses in 2022, according to the 2024 Vangst Jobs Report; and WHEREAS, the illicit market continues to thrive as unregulated operators evade taxation and safety requirements, undermining public health, consumer safety, and the integrity of the legal cannabis framework established under Proposition 64; and WHEREAS, instead of raising taxes in a way that weakens the legal market and benefits illicit operators, the state should focus on targeted tax relief and stronger enforcement measures to stabilize the market, protect small businesses, and maximize state revenues; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cotati formally urges Governor Gavin Newsom, the California State Legislature, and the Department of Cannabis Control to take immediate action to:
• Maintain the state cannabis excise tax at no more than 15% to prevent further market destabilization and protect state tax revenues.
• Support AB 564 and any other legislation that would amend the law that requires a tax hike on cannabis in California. We need lower taxes, not higher ones. Ensure that all intoxicating THC products, regardless of source, are taxed appropriately—if 127 of 539
companies are selling THC, they owe the state cannabis excise tax (licensed or not), and if they are selling any product, they owe the state sales and use tax. Enforcing these obligations will ensure fair market competition, protect public health, and recover lost revenue.
• Reinvest cannabis tax revenue into stronger enforcement and business support programs to combat illicit sales and provide relief to licensed operators struggling under excessive regulatory costs.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is directed to transmit copies of this resolution to:
• Governor Gavin Newsom
• The California State Legislature
• The California Department of Cannabis Control (DCC)
• The California State Association of Counties (CSAC)
• The League of California Cities (CalCities)
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cotati held on May 13, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

Approved:___________________________
Mayor
Attest:______________________________
Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to form:______________________________
City Attorney
128 of 539
california legislature—2025–26 regular session
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 564
Introduced by Assembly Member Haney
February 12, 2025
An act to amend Section 34011.2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to taxation, to take effect immediately, tax levy. legislative counsel’s digest
AB 564, as introduced, Haney. Cannabis: excise tax: rate increase repeal.

Existing law, the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA), an initiative measure, authorizes a person who obtains a state license under AUMA to engage in commercial adult-use cannabis activity pursuant to that license and applicable local ordinances. The Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA), among other things, consolidates the licensure and regulation of commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis activities.

Existing law, the Cannabis Tax Law, imposes an excise tax upon purchasers of cannabis or cannabis products sold in this state at the rate of 15% of the gross receipts of any retail sale by a cannabis retailer, and, as enacted by AUMA, imposed a cultivation tax on all harvested cannabis that entered the commercial market, as specified. Chapter 56 of the Statutes of 2022 (AB 195) amended AUMA to, among other things, discontinue the imposition of the cultivation tax on July 1, 2022.

AB 195, beginning in the 2025–26 fiscal year and every 2 years thereafter, requires the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to adjust the cannabis excise tax rate by a percentage that will generate an amount of revenue that would have been collected

99 129 of 539
pursuant to the cultivation tax imposed prior to its discontinuation, as specified, not to exceed 19% of the gross receipts of retail sale.

This bill would repeal the requirement that the department adjust the cannabis excise tax rate, as described above, thereby retaining the existing cannabis excise tax rate of 15% of the gross receipts of any retail sale by a cannabis retailer, as provided.

This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.

State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
line 1 SECTION 1. Section 34011.2 of the Revenue and Taxation line 2 Code is amended to read:
line 3 34011.2. (a)  (1)  Effective on and after January 1, 2023, a line 4 cannabis excise tax shall be imposed upon purchasers of cannabis line 5 or cannabis products sold in this state at 15 percent of the gross line 6 receipts of any retail sale by a cannabis retailer. line 7 (2)  For the 2025–26 fiscal year and every two years thereafter, line 8 the department, in consultation with the Department of Finance, line 9 shall on or before May 1 of the fiscal year immediately preceding line 10 the applicable fiscal year, adjust the cannabis excise tax rate upon line 11 purchasers of cannabis or cannabis products imposed in paragraph line 12 (1) by the additional percentage of the gross receipts of any retail line 13 sale by a cannabis retailer that the department estimates will line 14 generate an amount of revenue equivalent to the amount that would line 15 have been collected in the previous fiscal year pursuant to the line 16 weight-based cultivation tax imposed under Section 34012 as it line 17 read on the date before the effective date of the act adding this line 18 section. In no case shall the cannabis excise tax exceed 19 percent line 19 of the gross receipts of retail sale. The department shall round the line 20 rate calculated under this subdivision to the nearest one-quarter of line 21 1 percent. The adjusted rate shall become operative the following line 22 July 1.
line 23 (3)  On or before May 1, 2025, and each May 1 every two years line 24 thereafter, the department, in consultation with the Department of line 25 Finance, shall estimate the amount of revenue that would have line 26 been collected in the previous fiscal year pursuant to the line 27 weight-based cultivation tax imposed under Section 34012 as it line 28 read on the date before the effective date of the act adding this 99 AB 564 — 2 —
130 of 539
line 1 section. The department shall estimate this amount by projecting line 2 the revenue from weight-based cultivation taxes that would have line 3 been collected in the previous calendar year based on information line 4 available to the department, including, but not limited to, line 5 information in the track and trace system required pursuant to line 6 Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 26067) of Division 10 of line 7 the Business and Professions Code, or any implementing line 8 regulations, as a percentage of gross receipts from the retail sale line 9 of cannabis and cannabis products by cannabis retailers in the line 10 previous calendar year.
line 11 (b)  A purchaser’s liability for the cannabis excise tax is not line 12 extinguished until the cannabis excise tax has been paid to this line 13 state, except that an invoice, receipt, or other document from a line 14 cannabis retailer given to the purchaser pursuant to this section is line 15 sufficient to relieve the purchaser from further liability for the tax line 16 to which the invoice, receipt, or other document refers. line 17 (c)  A cannabis retailer shall be responsible for collecting the line 18 cannabis excise tax from the purchaser and remitting that tax to line 19 the department in accordance with this division. line 20 (d)  The cannabis retailer shall provide each purchaser with an line 21 invoice, receipt, or other document that separately states the line 22 cannabis excise tax.
line 23 (e)  The cannabis excise tax imposed by this section shall be in line 24 addition to the sales and use tax imposed by the state and local line 25 governments.
line 26 (f)  Gross receipts from the sale of cannabis or cannabis products line 27 for purposes of assessing the sales and use taxes under Part 1 line 28 (commencing with Section 6001) shall include the tax levied line 29 pursuant to this section.
line 30 (g)  Cannabis or cannabis products shall not be sold to a line 31 purchaser unless the cannabis excise tax imposed by this section line 32 has been paid by the purchaser at the time of sale. line 33 (h)  This section shall not be construed to impose a cannabis line 34 excise tax upon medicinal cannabis, or medicinal cannabis product, line 35 donated for no consideration to a medicinal cannabis patient line 36 pursuant to Section 26071 of the Business and Professions Code. line 37 (i)  (1)  This section shall not be construed to impose a cannabis line 38 excise tax upon cannabis or cannabis products designated as a line 39 trade sample pursuant to Section 26153.1 of the Business and line 40 Professions Code.
99 — 3 — AB 564
131 of 539
line 1 (2)  A person licensed under Division 10 (commencing with line 2 Section 26000) of the Business and Professions Code that sells line 3 cannabis or cannabis products designated as a trade sample line 4 pursuant to Section 26153.1 of the Business and Professions Code line 5 shall be liable for the cannabis excise tax imposed by this section line 6 as if the person were a cannabis retailer at the time of sale. line 7 (j)  This section shall become operative on January 1, 2023. line 8 SEC. 2. This act provides for a tax levy within the meaning of line 9 Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into line 10 immediate effect.

O
99 AB 564 — 4 —
132 of 539
Photo courtesy of March and Ash
US STATES | CALIFORNIA
California Bill Aims
to Repeal Cannabis
Excise Tax Increase
The legislation would block the current 15% retail
tax from automatically jumping to 19% on July 1.

By — Tony Lange
Feb 19th, 2025
This article was updated on Feb. 20, 2025.

Plummeting prices, less revenue, fewer licenses, debt,
wildfires and the ongoing threat of a tax hike—that’s the tip of the iceberg for California’s cannabis market in early 2025.
5/8/25, 10:16 AM California Bill Aims to Repeal Cannabis Excise Tax Increase | Cannabis Business Times https://www.cannabisbusinesstimes.com/print/content/15737828 1/6 133 of 539
Specifically, California is set to increase its cannabis excise tax at retail from 15% to 19% starting on July 1, 2025, as a result of a compromise elected officials made three years ago with certain beneficiaries of cannabis tax revenue.

However, one legislator is planning to stop that increase from happening.

Assemblymember Matt Haney, D-San Francisco, who
chairs the Housing and Community Development
Committee, introduced Assembly Bill 564 on Feb. 12.

The legislation would repeal a requirement for the
California Department of Tax and Fee Administration
(CDTFA) to adjust the cannabis excise tax rate by a
percentage that was written into law in 2022.

This forthcoming tax hike comes after roughly 27% of
U.S. cannabis businesses reported being profitable in
2024, according to a Whitney Economics survey.

Meanwhile, approximately 65% of all small businesses in the country were profitable last year.

In California, where the average price per ounce for
cannabis flower has dipped 38% since 2020, and
statewide sales have shrunk 13% since 2021, according to the California Department of Cannabis Control (DCC),
many licensed operators are hanging on by a thread from market conditions alone, much less from some elected
officials treating the industry as merely a revenue stream.

At the beginning of 2024, 15% of California’s licensed
dispensaries were in default on their excise taxes.

According to California NORML, which sponsors A.B.
564, the state levies a 1-cent tax on a glass of wine, 2 cents on a can of beer, 8 cents on a shot of liquor and roughly 14 cents on a single cigarette, while one cannabis pre-roll is taxed at $1.24 under the current 15% excise tax.
5/8/25, 10:16 AM California Bill Aims to Repeal Cannabis Excise Tax Increase | Cannabis Business Times https://www.cannabisbusinesstimes.com/print/content/15737828 2/6 134 of 539
Source: California NORML (used with permission)
In January, Haney told SFGATE that increasing taxes on
cannabis businesses wouldn’t just impact their ability to turn a profit but likely drive many operators out of the licensed market.
“I definitely understand the regulatory authority needs more resources, but that can’t be at the expense of putting out businesses that are already hanging on by a thread,” Haney said.

The scheduled tax hike stems from when Gov. Gavin
Newsom signed Assembly Bill 195, which was attached
as a trailer to the California 2021-2022 budget. Although A.B. 195 eliminated the state’s $161-per-pound cannabis cultivation tax on July 1, 2022, the legislation included a compromise with Tier 3 entities to make up for the lost funding.

That cultivation tax, in particular, accounted for more than $166 million in state revenue in 2021, according to the CDTFA. Increasing the cannabis excise tax at retail an additional four percentage points would generate roughly that same amount under current market conditions.

Under A.B. 195, childcare programs and youth groups;
environmental, wildlife and conservation programs; law
enforcement and justice organizations; drug treatment
prevention centers; and other Tier 3 programs were to
receive a minimum of $670 million in baseline funding
from annual cannabis tax revenues to avoid a take hike.

Newsom’s 2025-26 budget estimates $468.2 million in
cannabis tax revenue will be available to allocate to Tier 3 programs for the fiscal year:
5/8/25, 10:16 AM California Bill Aims to Repeal Cannabis Excise Tax Increase | Cannabis Business Times https://www.cannabisbusinesstimes.com/print/content/15737828 3/6 135 of 539
Education, prevention, and treatment of youth
substance-use disorders and school retention—60
percent ($281 million)
Clean-up, remediation, and enforcement of
environmental impacts created by illicit cannabis
cultivation—20 percent ($93.6 million)
Public safety-related activities—20 percent
($93.6 million)
That’s more than $200 million less than the baseline
amount needed to avoid the tax hike.

Fifty-six of these entities signed a letter to Newsom and legislative leaders last year requesting to reinstate the cannabis cultivation tax or increase the excise tax, despite these programs having a surplus of more than $600
million as of March 2024, including roughly $260 million in each the law enforcement and childcare accounts,
according to a budget summary from the state Assembly.

Despite the Golden State’s promise to establish a
regulated ecosystem that would allow tax-paying
cannabis operators to thrive following the passage of
Proposition 64 in the 2016 election, the unlicensed market could become more attractive for businesses and
consumers alike following the excise tax increase on July 1, 2025.
“Cannabis taxes are already absurdly high, a tax increase would just drive more price-sensitive consumers to illegal shops, further undercutting licensed businesses like ours and lowering overall tax collections for the state,” Bret Peace, CEO at San Diego-based retailer March and Ash,
told Cannabis Business Times.

March and Ash, which merged with cultivator and
manufacturer CannaCraft in 2022, operates 10
dispensaries in Southern California.
5/8/25, 10:16 AM California Bill Aims to Repeal Cannabis Excise Tax Increase | Cannabis Business Times https://www.cannabisbusinesstimes.com/print/content/15737828 4/6 136 of 539
March and Ash cannabis dispensary in Imperial, Calif.

Source: Photo courtesy of March and Ash
Although the exact size of California’s unregulated
cannabis market is unknown, local media outlets
commonly cite a $10-billion estimate, meaning roughly
two out of three transactions occur outside licensed
dispensaries each year. The state’s licensed dispensaries sold $4.66 billion in cannabis in 2024, according to the DCC.

Angelica Sanchez, senior director of government affairs and compliance at vertically integrated Perfect Union,
also said California's taxes on cannabis businesses are already high enough.
“California’s legal cannabis retailers are already
struggling under excessive taxation, overregulation, and unfair competition from illicit operators and unregulated hemp," she said. "This tax hike only adds to the burden, making legal products less competitive and driving
consumers to the illicit market. It threatens the long-term sustainability of the legal market and places us at a severe disadvantage.”
The Perfect Union also operates 10 licensed dispensaries, mostly in Northern California.

Tiffany Devitt, director of regulatory affairs with March and Ash, compared California to Michigan, where a lessoppressive tax structure, in part, has allowed licensed retailers to reach a greater percentage of the state's
cannabis consumers.
“The fact that Michigan, with just a quarter of
California’s population, is selling more cannabis in its regulated market than we are highlights the failure of our state to fulfill the promise of Proposition 64—to ‘tax and 5/8/25, 10:16 AM California Bill Aims to Repeal Cannabis Excise Tax Increase | Cannabis Business Times https://www.cannabisbusinesstimes.com/print/content/15737828 5/6 137 of 539
regulate cannabis in a manner that eliminates the illicit market,’” Devitt said. “A tax increase on cannabis would only exacerbate the already significant price gap between the legal and illicit markets.”
Editor’s note: CBT reached out to nine of California’s
larger cannabis retail operators, asking how the pending tax hike would impact their businesses. This article will be updated with more comments as they come in.

While Michigan passed California in cannabis units sold in mid-2023, Michigan is still runner-up in overall sales with $3.3 billion reported from licensed retailers in 2024, according to the state’s Cannabis Regulatory Agency.

Still, Michigan’s licensed market sells nearly three times the amount of cannabis per capita as California.

This per-capita discrepancy, in part, is due to 57% of
California’s cities and counties prohibiting cannabis retail businesses from operating in their jurisdictions, according to the DCC.

California’s active license count for dispensaries in 2024 was 1,225, meaning the average store sold roughly $4
million of cannabis for the year. That equates to roughly $600,000 in excise taxes owed per dispensary.

For a business that operates 10 dispensaries, that’s $6 million in excise taxes, not to mention the state’s 7.25% to 10.75% sales tax, depending on the region, as well as various local tax structures.

Should A.B. 564 fail to stave off the pending tax hike, each dispensary would be on the hook for an additional
$160,000 in excise taxes per year on average.

Source URL:
https://www.cannabisbusinesstimes.com/usstates/california/news/15737828/california-billaims-to-repeal-cannabis-excise-tax-increase 5/8/25, 10:16 AM California Bill Aims to Repeal Cannabis Excise Tax Increase | Cannabis Business Times https://www.cannabisbusinesstimes.com/print/content/15737828 6/6 138 of 539
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: PUBLIC HEARINGS (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW, A TREE REMOVAL

PERMIT, PARKLAND DEDICATION, AND A VESTING
TENTATIVE MAP TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 178-

UNIT MULTIFAMILY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT ON A

10.62-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE

INTERSECTION OF REDWOOD DRIVE AND STATE ROUTE
(SR) 116 AND FINDING THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH

THE COTATI GENERAL PLAN AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT REPORT AND EXEMPT FROM FURTHER

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15183 (PA#22-07 / APNs 046-286-017, -018, -019 & -020) Date: May 13, 2025
Written by: JP Harries, Senior Planner
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council hold a Public Hearing and adopt the accompanying Resolution, determining that the project is consistent with the General Plan Environmental Impact Report and is exempt from further environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183; and approve Preliminary Design Review, a Tree Removal Permit, and a Vesting Tentative Map (including Parkland Dedication) to permit the development of a multifamily mixed-use project that includes 134 townhome-style condominium units with up to 33 optional accessory dwelling units (ADUs), 44 affordable apartment units, 10,032 square feet of commercial space, approximately 1.08 acres of public parkland, and other ancillary improvements on a vacant 10.62-acre property located northwest of the intersection of Redwood Drive and SR-116.

Background
The project site occupies the southeastern section of the previously approved South Sonoma Business Park (SSBP). After the SSBP was approved, the site, including the project area, was graded in 2002. In 2004, the Cotati Cottages, a 46-unit residential development northwest of the 139 of 539
project site, was built, along with public improvements to Alder Avenue. In 2006, a 165,382- square-foot Lowe’s Home Improvement store was constructed. Due in part to the 2008 Great Recession, the commercial buildings planned for this site under the SSBP were never built.

However, the site has been actively managed for over 20 years to ensure proper drainage and fire control, with annual disking and mowing as part of the maintenance routine.

On May 26, 2022, an initial SB 330 preliminary application for the Redwood Row project was submitted, accompanied by applications for Design Review, an Environmental Assessment, and a Vesting Tentative Map (including parkland dedication). This application was deemed incomplete and did not meet objective standards for approval. A revised SB 330 preliminary application was submitted on October 30, 2024, followed by a final, complete submittal on November 21, 2024.

A neighborhood meeting to present the project and gather community feedback was held at City Hall on February 5, 2025. Only one community member attended, and they expressed no concerns or issues regarding the project.

Planning Commission Review
On April 21, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed the project at a noticed public hearing and unanimously supported the project. Their discussion primarily focused on ensuring that the apartment building and its residents are integrated into the broader development, with access to all project amenities, including the pool and pool building. They also recommended design modifications in front of the apartment building to enhance this integration.

The Commission endorsed the proposed public parks and requested the inclusion of pedestrianscale wayfinding signage to promote their availability. Additionally, they recommended incorporating public art into the parks’ landscape plan.

The Commission addressed waste management, including trash, compost, and recycling. The applicant confirmed that each condominium unit would have individual 64-gallon bins for each waste stream, and the proposed streets are wide enough to accommodate bins on pickup days.

The apartment building will utilize containers within a dedicated trash enclosure.

The Commission also discussed the proposed 33 optional accessory dwelling units (ADUs).

They supported including the ADUs in the project, noting that they could help prospective buyers afford condominiums by generating rental income or accommodate multi-generational families living together.

The Planning Commission voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend City Council approval of the entitlements needed for the project. To address the Planning Commission’s interests and concerns, the following conditions of approval were recommended and incorporated into the accompanying Resolution:
140 of 539

1. In the Final Landscape Plan, designate a space for public art within the central public park or another highly visible location approved by the Community Development Department.

2. Applicant shall contribute to the City’s bicycle and pedestrian wayfinding program or install wayfinding signage along the project frontage to identify the onsite public park locations and access points.

3. Create a stronger pedestrian link between the apartment building and the rest of the development to better integrate it with the condominium units and central open space. To improve pedestrian connectivity, explore alternative paving options for the portion of Street C in front of the apartment building, such as woonerf-style designs, and incorporate pedestrian-focused lighting.

4. The proposed optional 33 ADUs shall be included in the Project and offered as an option for prospective buyers.

5. All on-site amenities, including the swimming pool and pool house, must be accessible to all Project residents, including those in the apartment building. The Homeowners Association's CC&Rs shall clearly outline the process or method for granting access to Project residents who are not HOA members but wish to use the facilities. Any fees for access must be proportional to the costs of maintaining and operating these amenities. (Staff report continues on next page)
141 of 539
Project Description
Project Location
The Project site is comprised of four contiguous parcels that occupy approximately 10.62 acres.

The Project site is vacant and undeveloped, consisting primarily of non-native vegetation and scattered trees. The site is relatively flat due to the mass grading in 2002.

Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
As shown in Figure 1, the project site is bounded by SR-116 (Gravenstein Highway) to the south, Lowe’s Home Improvement to the north, a restaurant and Redwood Drive to the east, and an undeveloped parcel to the west, which is the future site of the Cotati Village 1 project.

Surrounding land uses include commercial development to the north, east, and southeast and the Cotati Cottages residential townhouse development to the northwest. Two mixed-use, multifamily developments have been approved on the two parcels immediately west of the project site. Cotati Village 1, adjacent to the project site, is approved for 177 units and Cotati Village 2, on the western side of Alder Avenue, is approved for 126 units. An undeveloped parcel lies across SR-116 to the south of the project site.

Site Design
As detailed in the attached plan set (Attachment D), the proposed project involves merging four existing lots and subdividing them into two lots to develop a mixed-use multifamily community.

The first lot will include 134 townhome-style condominiums (with 33 optional accessory dwelling units (ADUs)), 10,032 square feet of gross commercial floor area, a private community pool, and public parkland. The second lot will feature an apartment building with 44 deed142 of 539 restricted affordable units and associated parking. The project also includes frontage improvements, vehicle and bicycle circulation and parking, landscaping, lighting, and other ancillary enhancements.

Figure 2. Project Site Plan
Mixed-use Buildings
Buildings A and B, located along SR-116, are three-story structures with a maximum height of 44 feet. The ground floor of each building will feature garages and front entrances leading to condominiums situated on the second and third floors. Sixteen commercial spaces, intended for sale and ranging from 585 to 753 square feet, will occupy the ground floor on the south-facing side of both buildings. These commercial units will face SR-116 and be accessible via a proposed multi-use path along the property frontage. Building A will house nine residential units, while Building B will contain seven residential units. (Staff report continues on next page)
143 of 539
Figure 3: Project Rendering of the Mixed-Use Buildings
Townhome-styled condominiums
Buildings C through CC will be arranged around the central open space of the project site. Most townhome-style buildings will contain six units, though some will have as few as three units, and Building U will house eight units. Each building will be three stories tall, with an estimated height of 39 feet. In total, 118 condominium units will be distributed across the 23 townhomestyle residential structures. The buildings are designed with pedestrian entrances on the side facing pedestrian pathways or open space areas. Each unit includes a front yard with a low fence for exclusive use, though the land remains commonly owned. Individual garages, oriented toward vehicle circulation areas, are proposed for each unit. The condominiums are planned as three-bedroom units, with an optional fourth bedroom or accessory dwelling unit (ADU) and will range in size from 1,765 to 2,183 square feet. Garages will vary from 496 to 565 square feet.

The project includes up to 33 optional ground-floor ADUs, complying with the maximum 25% allowed under CMC Section 17.42.170.A.3 and state law. These 33 ADUs also contribute to the City’s requirement (CMC Section 17.78.030.C) that subdivisions include at least 10% singlestory units with accessibility features.

Apartment Building
Forty-four affordable housing units will be housed in a single three-story apartment building located on the eastern portion of the project site. The building has a maximum proposed height of 39 feet and spans approximately 16,000 square feet. Its primary entrance, on the western side, connects to a pedestrian and bike path that links to the multi-use path along SR-116. A secondary entrance is proposed on the northern side, accessible from the associated parking lot. The units 144 of 539
will include one, two, or three bedrooms and range in size from 550 to 1,150 square feet.

Figure 4: Project Rendering of the Apartment Building
Architecture
The architectural design of the Redwood Row buildings features contemporary craftsman-style elements. All buildings will be three stories tall with pitched roofs and varied rooflines. Facades will include pop-outs or step-backs for visual interest. Articulation is achieved through diverse exterior materials, such as board-and-batten siding, stucco, horizontal siding, brick, and stone veneer, complemented by single-hung windows, brackets, and horizontal railings. Commercial spaces in Buildings A and B will feature large glazed storefront windows and shopfront doors.

Roofing will consist of composition shingle materials.

Parkland and Open Space
The central common open space includes a community pool and pool building, reserved exclusively for project residents. Adjacent to this is a public park with seating areas and a children’s playground. A prominent valley oak tree, preserved as a focal point, enhances the central open space. Additionally, a triangular public dog park, featuring separate areas for small and large dogs, will be located along the western boundary, south of the existing Cotati Cottages park. Both public parks will be developed as part of the project, dedicated through a public access easement, and maintained by the Homeowners’ Association (HOA). The boundaries of the proposed parkland dedications and other open space components are detailed on Sheet L2 of Attachment D.

Site Access and Circulation
The project site will have vehicle access from SR-116 via a 26-foot-wide driveway located between Buildings A and B, with an additional access point west of Building B. Two Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) points are proposed: one from the Lowe’s parking lot and another at the 145 of 539
southeastern corner of the property from SR-116.

Pedestrian access will be facilitated throughout the site by a new shared pedestrian and bicycle path along the SR-116 frontage, as well as internal walkways along the site’s roadways, surrounding the residential buildings, and connecting to community spaces.

Parking
The Project, as conditioned, complies with the City’s parking regulations set forth in CMC Chapter 17.36 and State Density Bonus Law.

Each three- or four-bedroom condominium will include two vehicle parking spaces and one bicycle space within a garage.

The proposed apartment building will consist of 21 one-bedroom units, 12 two-bedroom units, and 11 three-bedroom units, requiring 56 parking spaces. The project provides 57 parking spaces for the apartment building, with one space potentially convertible to two motorcycle spaces.

The project includes 10,032 square feet of commercial floor area, requiring 41 parking spaces.

Forty-one commercial parking spaces are provided, which will also serve the proposed public parks, for which no specific parking standards apply. Additionally, 34 guest parking spaces are distributed throughout the project.

Bicycle parking is planned across the project site, and conditions of approval mandate that, during Final Design Review, evidence must be provided to confirm that bicycle parking meets applicable standards and is appropriately located.

Woonerfs
As mandated by the City’s Land Use Code, the project will incorporate woonerfs along portions of the internal roadways, specifically the northern alleyways labeled E, F, G, and H Streets, as depicted on Sheets L-2, L-5, and L-8 of Attachment D. Each woonerf, approximately 140 feet long, will create pedestrian-oriented zones between the residential units in that area. Features such as colored and textured paving, traffic-calming measures at entrances, signage, overhead pedestrian-scale string lighting, and landscaping and seating (where feasible) will enhance the pedestrian-friendly environment. Woonerfs are excluded from other areas of the project to ensure adequate access for fire apparatus throughout the site.

Offsite Improvements
The proposed frontage improvements include constructing two new vehicular entrances and an emergency vehicle access road from SR-116 into the development, along with a 14-foot-wide paved multi-use path along the SR-116 frontage. These improvements align with the City’s proposed Highway 116 Corridor Improvement Project, currently in the design phase, which includes realigning West Cotati Avenue and signalizing its intersection with SR-116. This new intersection will provide vehicle and bicycle access to the project at its western property line.

The project is responsible for constructing the eastern portion of the northern leg and the northern portion of the eastern leg of the intersection. If the Highway 116 Corridor Improvement Project is not completed before occupancy, the Traffic Impact Study requires the project to 146 of 539
install an eastbound left-turn lane on SR-116 to ensure vehicular access to the site.

Figure 5: Portion of Highway 116 Corridor Improvement Project (30% Design)  Cotati Village 1 | Redwood Row 
Landscaping
The Landscape Site Plan incorporates a variety of trees, shrubs, groundcover, grasses, and vines.

Trees and other landscaping are planned along the project site’s perimeter, within the parking lot, between buildings, and in public open spaces.

The plan prioritizes the preservation of a prominent existing oak tree at the site’s center and additional oaks at the southeast corner. The landscaping features drought-tolerant plants and a high-efficiency irrigation system with weather-based controllers. Landscape areas will create buffers, provide shade, and function as biofiltration and stormwater detention facilities. A landscaping strip along the southern property line fronting SR-116 will include tree planting. 147 of 539
The Project is conditioned to comply with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO) and outdoor lighting standards as provided in the CMC Chapter 17.34 and Section

17.30.060 respectively.

Water Supply
Potable water will be provided through new water laterals installed within the development, connecting the buildings to the existing water main along SR-116. Fire hydrants, compliant with the California Fire Code, will be installed throughout the project site and served by these new water connections.

Wastewater
Wastewater will be managed through the installation of a new sanitary sewer lateral connecting to an existing sanitary sewer line located at the northern boundary of the property. The new sewer lines will collect wastewater generated on-site and convey it through the existing sanitary sewer system to the wastewater processing plant for treatment Solid Waste
Each condominium garage will include sufficient space for three household-sized waste bins (trash, recycling, and compost). Trash rooms, located on the ground floor at the northeast corner of Buildings A and B, will accommodate waste, recycling, and compost from the commercial units. A trash enclosure at the northeast corner of the parking lot will serve the apartment building, providing space for all three refuse streams (trash, recycling, and compost).

Storm Drainage Infrastructure
Storm drains will be installed across the project site to channel stormwater from impervious surfaces to landscape areas, bioretention areas, and other vegetated bio-retention features, in accordance with Low Impact Development requirements. Fourteen drainage management areas (DMAs) are proposed to capture and treat stormwater flows throughout the site.

Analysis/Discussion
General Plan Conformity
The project aligns with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC) and the zoning district of Commercial, Gravenstein Corridor (CG). The GC designation supports the basic business and service needs of the local community, including shopping centers, neighborhood retail, and highway-oriented commercial uses. It also permits office and multifamily residential uses that integrate well with adjacent districts, allowing a base density of 15 dwelling units per acre and up to 80% site coverage. The CG zoning designation implements the GC land use by permitting a mix of retail, service, and residential uses in mixed-use projects, serving both local and regional markets. The project’s proposed ground-floor commercial spaces and multi-family residential units comply with the allowable uses under both the General Plan and CG zoning designations.

The Project aligns with key General Plan policies promoting mixed-use development, infill growth, and affordable housing, including the following:
• Policy CI 1.3: Establish a minimum motor vehicle Level of Service (LOS) standard of 148 of 539
LOS D at intersections.
• Policy LU 1.4: Require new development to occur in a logical and orderly manner, focusing growth on infill locations and areas designated for urbanization on the Land Use Map, and be subject to the ability to provide urban services, including paying for any needed extension of services.
• Policy LU 2.11: Continue to mix residential and commercial uses in appropriate areas, with an emphasis on providing mixed uses in the areas with Specific Plan land use designations.
• Policy LU 3.2: Encourage infill development of vacant lots within existing commercial districts and the core downtown/business areas and prioritize such development.
• Policy H-2.2: Continue to require that residential development in the NU, NM, CG, and DSP zones meet the minimum density requirements identified in the Land Use Code, and report requests for reduced density on an annual basis. • Policy H-2.7: Require housing developments to provide housing units at a range of affordability levels to assist in meeting the City’s housing needs as required by Chapter 17.31 of the Land Use Code.
• Policy H-2.11: Encourage housing development on existing infill sites in order to efficiently utilize existing infrastructure.
• Policy H-3-2: Provide incentives for discretionary affordable housing development that address community priorities, including density bonuses, expedited processing, relaxation in development standards through the use of concessions and incentives, and either reduction, delay, or waiver of fees when financially feasible. • Policy H-3-3: Continue to provide density bonuses to eligible projects as required by Government Code Section 65915, including projects that meet the minimum amount of total units affordable to extremely low, very low- and low-income households or provide units restricted to occupancy for senior households.

Biological Resources
As noted above, the project site forms part of the former South Sonoma Business Park (SSBP) project, which spanned approximately 34 acres and was fully mitigated and permitted. The SSBP site underwent mass grading in 2002. To secure state and federal resource agency permits and the City’s grading permit, the SSBP applicants acquired all required mitigation bank credits and mitigation property to address impacts on the state- and federally listed Sebastopol meadowfoam (Limnanthes vinculans) and California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense).

Following the 2002 mass grading, portions of the SSBP site were fully developed, including Cotati Cottages and Lowe’s, while other areas, including the Redwood Row project site, were graded and wetlands filled with imported clean soil but left undeveloped. Despite remaining undeveloped, the Redwood Row site has been actively managed for over 20 years to ensure proper drainage and fire control, with annual disking and mowing as part of the maintenance regimen. Apart from some oak trees, almost all vegetation within the project site today consists of non-native herbaceous grasses.

To fund the required mitigation for the SSBP project, the South Sonoma Business Park Assessment District (SSBPAD) was established, encompassing the Redwood Row project site. 149 of 539
The mitigation costs included creating a maintenance fund and a permanent capital endowment with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for the ongoing operation and maintenance of the SSBP wetlands mitigation and California tiger salamander replacement habitat. The property owner has made annual payments to the assessment district, totaling approximately $2.7 million to date, with an estimated $1 million more to be paid through 2033.

Affordable Housing and State Density Bonus Law (SDBL)
The City’s affordable housing regulations (CMC Chapter 17.31) mandate that 15% of housing units in a residential development be deed-restricted as affordable based on Area Median Income (AMI). The project site, situated in the Commercial, Gravenstein Corridor (CG) zoning district, permits a base density of 15 units per acre, allowing 160 units on the 10.62-acre site. Of these, 24 units (15%) must be affordable.

The project was designed under the City’s affordable housing regulations in effect before October 30, 2024, the date the applicant’s SB 330 vesting application was accepted by the City.

Those regulations required that one-third of the affordable units be allocated to very low-income households, one-third to low-income households, and one-third to moderate-income households.

Although not applicable to this project, as of December 12, 2024, new affordable housing requirements align with the City’s unmet Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). Based on the latest 2024 Annual Progress Report (APR), which discloses the City’s unmet RHNA, 46% of a project’s affordable units would need to be reserved for very low-income households, 25% for low-income households and 29% for moderate income households.

The applicant’s Inclusionary Housing Plan (Attachment B) outlines that the project will provide 44 affordable units, exceeding the requirement by 20 units. This includes the eight required units for very low-income households, eight required units for low-income households, and eight required units for moderate-income households. The extra twenty units will be allocated to moderate-income households. All 44 affordable units are proposed to be housed in a single apartment building on a separate parcel from the condominiums and mixed-use units.

By allocating eight units (5% of the base total) to very low-income households, the project qualifies for a density bonus under State Density Bonus Law (SDBL, Government Code 65915).

SDBL encourages affordable housing by offering favorable development standards in exchange for deed-restricted affordable units. Per SDBL, if 5% of the base units (8 of 160) are designated for very low-income households, the project is eligible for a 20% density increase, allowing up to 192 units on the 10.62-acre site.

The project proposes 178 units, surpassing the City’s base limit of 160 units but remaining below the 192 units permitted under SDBL. It is worth noting that 18 additional “bonus units” result from the project providing 20 more deed-restricted affordable units than the required 24.

SDBL also allows for concessions and waivers from City standards. The project is eligible for one by-right, non-discretionary concession, defined as a modification to development standards that reduces the cost of producing affordable housing. The applicant has requested the following concession:
150 of 539
• Relief from CMC 17.31.040.A (Location of Affordable Units) As described in Attachments B and C, the applicant requests a concession under SDBL to consolidate all 44 affordable units in a single apartment building, deviating from CMC Section 17.31.040.A, which requires affordable units to be dispersed throughout the project. This concession is sought to enable the developer to compete for tax credit financing and other low-cost funding, which significantly reduces the cost of providing affordable housing.

The applicant plans to collaborate with an affordable housing partner, such as Burbank Housing, to develop and manage affordable the apartment units. To facilitate this relationship and to allow access to tax credit and low-cost financing, the project includes subdividing the land and consolidating the affordable units in a separate structure.

Residents of the apartment building will not be members of the HOA or pay HOA dues.

The Planning Commission raised concerns that this could prevent apartment residents from accessing the pool and pool building due to liability issues. To address this, a condition of approval requires that the HOA’s Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) include a mechanism allowing apartment residents to access the pool if they choose. Any associated fee will be proportional to the costs of maintaining and operating the pool. The project applicant has proposed a User Agreement to facilitate this access, estimating a fee of approximately $50 per month or less per household.

Additionally, conditions of approval require that the apartment building be constructed before final occupancy of the project is granted.

SDBL law also allows an unlimited number of waivers of the City’s development standards. A waiver is a change in the adopted development standard that results in the Project’s ability to be built at the permitted density and with the granted concessions. The waivers must be granted byright and are non-discretionary. The Project requests several waivers of development standards:
• Reduction in commercial component requirement for a mixed-use project. The CG zoning district requires at least 25% of the Project’s total floor area to be commercial.

The Project’s total proposed floor area is approximately 255,116 square feet. Of that total square footage, 10,032 square feet is proposed to be commercial, which results in less than 1% of commercial floor area. The waiver is required because significantly more building floor area would need to be added to the project to meet the 25% requirement, or the number of residential units would need to be decreased below the amount allowed by the City’s zoning and SDBL provisions.
• Reduction of standards for woonerf. The City’s woonerf design standards require any internal driveway within a multifamily development of ten units or more, or the residential portion(s) of a horizontal mixed-use project with ten or more residential units, to be designed as a woonerf. As proposed, the Project would include woonerfs in the northern alleyways labeled E, F, G, and H Streets. The other Project streets are not designed as woonerfs. Providing woonerf designs elements in these areas, including 151 of 539
seating and landscaping, would require additional roadway width to meet the access and clearance needs of fire apparatus vehicles. The waiver is required because the Project proposes the minimum amount of pavement/roadway needed to accommodate the project while also providing for the required housing density, parkland, and parking. Increased roadway width would result in the reduction of units allowable under SDBL. • Increase the maximum building height. The height limit in the CG district is 35 feet. The proposed residential and mixed-used buildings, all three stories, range in height from 39 to 44 feet. The additional height is required to provide architectural interest and compliance with the City’s design standards, as well as adequate ceiling height within the commercial spaces of the mixed-use buildings. Compliance with the 35-foot height limit would result in a reduced number of dwelling units.
• Placement of structures in the setbacks. Development in the CG district requires a 30- foot setback from the SR-116 right-of-way. The Project largely respects this setback from the SR-116 roadway, with a Class I multi-use path and landscaping separating the buildings from the roadway. However, after dedication of a 25-foot-wide area along SR116, buildings A and B will have a zero-foot setback from the right-of-way • Accessibility requirements for multifamily projects. CMC Section 17.78.030.C requires subdivisions to construct a minimum of 10% of single-story units with accessibility features. The apartment building provides 14 ground floor units which can be developed with accessibility features, but all condominium units are three-story units that provide their primary living space on the second and third stories above the garages. To partially address this issue, the Project proposes 33 optional ground-level ADUs which can be constructed with accessibility features as desired. Absent the waiver, the Project would need to be redesigned to provide single-story condominium units with parking on the same ground level. This would prevent the Project from being developed at the proposed and allowed density.

Design Review Findings (CMC Chapter 17.62)
To approve Preliminary Design Review, the City must make the following findings:

1. Complies with Cotati Municipal Code Section 17.62.040 (Design Review);

2. Provides architectural design, building massing and scale appropriate to and compatible with the site surroundings and the community;

3. Provides attractive and desirable site layout and design, including building arrangement, exterior appearance and setbacks, drainage, fences and walls, grading, landscaping, lighting, signs, etc.;

4. Provides efficient, safe, and visually attractive public access, circulation and parking;

5. Provides appropriate open space and landscaping, including the use of water-efficient landscaping, and native plants where appropriate;
152 of 539

6. Addresses site planning design considerations related to city services, traffic flows and patterns, and environmental conditions in a manner that ensures maximum aesthetic cohesiveness;

7. Is consistent with the general plan and applicable specific plans; and

8. Complies with any applicable city design guidelines, design standards, and/or design review policies.

Staff Response - The proposed project, with conditions, complies with the City of Cotati General Plan and CMC Section 17.62.040 (Design Review). The project application includes all required information for Preliminary Design Review approval and is conditioned to provide necessary materials for Final Design Review evaluation and approval.

As proposed and conditioned, the project adheres to the City’s General Plan and Land Use Code provisions for site planning, design, building architecture, landscaping, pedestrian and vehicle access and circulation, energy and resource conservation, and utility use, except where concessions or waivers are granted under State Density Bonus Law.

The project’s architectural design incorporates contemporary craftsman-style elements, featuring gabled roofs with corbels and kickers, overhanging eaves, divided-light windows, and 4-inch wood trim around windows and doors, aligning with the City’s objective design standards for multifamily buildings. Dwelling units include entry porches and balconies on upper levels. The rectangular building forms are articulated with recessed and projecting frontages, awnings, and varied exterior materials and colors. Commercial spaces in Buildings A and B, fronting SR-116, feature brick or stone veneer to distinguish them from residential units and include large, glazed shopfront windows and entry doors on the southern elevation for added transparency.

The project will have two access points from SR-116: a 26-foot-wide driveway between Buildings A and B and a public access point west of Building B, adjacent to the property line.

The latter forms part of the northern and eastern legs of a proposed signalized intersection at SR116 and a realigned West Cotati Avenue. Two additional EVA points are planned: one from the Lowe’s parking lot and another at the southeastern corner from SR-116. The project includes a network of roads and driveways for internal circulation, providing access to 268 parking spaces for townhouses (within individual garages), 57 spaces for apartments, 34 guest parking spaces, and 41 commercial parking spaces. Pedestrian access will be facilitated by a new shared pedestrian and bicycle path along the SR-116 frontage, internal walkways along site roadways, and pathways around residential buildings and community spaces.

The Landscape Site Plan proposes a mix of trees, shrubs, groundcover, grasses, and vines, placed along the project’s perimeter, within the parking lot, between buildings, and in public open spaces. The public park and related improvements partially meet the dedication requirements under CMC Section 17.76.030. The plan preserves existing oak trees at the site’s center and southeast corner. Landscaping features drought-tolerant plants and a high-efficiency irrigation system with weather-based controllers. Landscape areas will provide buffers, shade, and serve as 153 of 539
biofiltration and stormwater detention facilities. A landscaping strip along the southern property line fronting SR-116 will include tree planting.

The project has been reviewed by the Community Development Department, Department of Public Works/Engineering, Police Department, Rancho Adobe Fire Protection District, and relevant external agencies. No issues have been identified that would hinder the project’s development or the provision of services to residents. Final Design Review will be required to ensure the project incorporates all remaining design elements needed for full compliance with the City’s Objective Design Standards.

Tree Removal Findings (CMC Chapter 17.54)
To approve the tree removal, the City must make the following findings:

1. The approval of the tree permit will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, and approval of the tree permit is consistent with the provisions of this chapter;

2. Measures have been incorporated into the Project or permit to mitigate impacts to remaining trees or to replace the trees removed in compliance with this chapter;

3. The removal of a healthy tree cannot be avoided by:
a. Reasonable redesign of the site plan prior to construction, or b. Trimming, thinning, tree surgery, or other reasonable treatment, as determined by the director;

4. Adequate provisions for drainage, erosion control, land stability, windscreen, buffers along the road and between neighbors have been made where these problems are anticipated as a result of the removal; and

5. The tree to be removed does not contain an active nest that has been identified through the environmental process or is otherwise known to the review authority as the nest of a migratory bird, except where a qualified professional has determined that the nest can be relocated without damage to the nestlings.

Staff Response - The project site features a prominent oak tree at its center and several oak trees along the southeast property line adjacent to the China Village parking lot. Additionally, there is a small eucalyptus tree near the central oak and two off-site oak trees adjacent to SR-116.

Currently, only the eucalyptus tree is proposed for removal. The central oak tree will be preserved as a key element of the project’s design and layout, and the oak trees along the southeast property line will also be retained. The two oaks along SR-116 are not slated for removal but may be affected pending final designs for SR-116 improvements.

Per CMC Section 17.54.050, the removal of the eucalyptus tree requires planting two replacement trees, which will be incorporated into the final landscape plan. Alternatively, an inlieu fee of $256 may be paid to the City’s tree mitigation fund. 154 of 539
The project is conditioned to include an oak preservation and monitoring plan prepared by an arborist to ensure the survival of protected oaks. If preservation is deemed infeasible, the project must mitigate any loss according to the replacement criteria. Modifications to the project may be required to guarantee the oaks’ survival.

The eucalyptus tree proposed for removal does not serve as a privacy buffer, provide wind screening, or impact on-site drainage, erosion, or land stability, and its removal is not expected to cause adverse effects.

To protect nesting birds, the project includes conditions requiring a pre-construction nesting bird survey if construction begins between February 1 and August 31. The survey must be conducted within seven days of grading. If no nesting birds are found, no further action is needed, but grading must commence within one week of the survey to avoid impacting birds that may begin nesting afterward. A follow-up survey is required if work stops for more than seven days. If active nests (passerine or raptor) are observed, a disturbance-free buffer zone must be established around the nest tree(s) until the young have fledged or the nest has naturally failed or been predated, as confirmed by a qualified biologist.

Subdivision Findings (CMC Chapter 17.71)

1. The proposed map, and/or subdivision design or improvements are consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan;

2. The site is physically suitable for the type or proposed density of development;

3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;

4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems;

5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and

6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Staff Response – The project proposes merging four lots and subdividing the property into two lots. In alignment with the General Plan, the City’s zoning map and Land Use Code place the site within the Commercial, Gravenstein Corridor (CG) zoning district, which permits a density of 15 units per acre and a minimum lot size of 2,500 square feet. With the application of State Density Bonus Law, the proposed project complies with these standards. 155 of 539
The project falls within the scope of development envisioned by the General Plan and its accompanying Environmental Impact Report (EIR). As conditioned, the project introduces no new environmental impacts beyond those identified in the General Plan EIR, and no unique sitespecific circumstances would result in unforeseen significant environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated as outlined in the EIR.

The project has been reviewed by the Community Development Department, Department of Public Works/Engineering, Police Department, Rancho Adobe Fire Protection District, and relevant external agencies. No issues or site-specific conditions have been identified that would pose public health or safety risks or hinder the provision of services to residents.

No recorded easements burden the property that would provide public access through or use of the project site, and the subdivision will not affect any such easements.

The businesses and residences within the proposed subdivision will connect to the City’s sewer system, which complies with the requirements of the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. An analysis by the City’s utility consultant, Carollo, confirmed that the existing sewer system has sufficient capacity to handle the project’s projected sewer discharge and identified no deficiencies that would prevent servicing the proposed subdivision.

Park Dedication (CMC Chapter 17.76)
The recommendation by the Director and the action of the review authority shall consider the following factors:

1. The amount of land required;

2. Whether a fee shall be charged in lieu of land;

3. Whether land and a fee shall be required;

4. The location and stability of the park land to be dedicated or use of in-lieu fees; and

5. The approximate time when development of the park or recreation facility shall commence.

Staff Response - Under CMC Chapter 17.76.030.C (Amount of Parkland Required), the project must dedicate 1.88 acres of parkland. The project proposes to dedicate and improve approximately 47,210 square feet (1.08 acres) of parkland, including a public dog park, a children’s play area, a community park, and associated parking. These dedications partially fulfill the requirements of CMC Section 17.76.030.C. Per CMC Section 17.76.030.F.5 (Credit for Improvements), park and recreational improvements, including installed equipment, provided by the subdivider on dedicated land will be credited against required fees or land obligations.

Pursuant to CMC Section 17.76.030.F (Criteria for Requiring Dedication and Fees), the project will pay an in-lieu fee for any remaining parkland obligation not met by the dedication and improvements. The final in-lieu fee, if applicable after accounting for improvement costs, will be determined in accordance with CMC Chapter 17.76.030.
156 of 539
General Plan Goal OS 2 seeks to establish a high-quality park and recreation network serving all segments of Cotati’s population. Currently, no parks exist in the City north of State Route 116 and west of Highway 101. The project’s parkland dedication advances General Plan Policies OS

2.2, 2.4, and 2.7 by creating new parkland west of Highway 101—an area identified as lacking facilities (OS 2.7)—and establishing the City’s second dog park. The parkland will be dedicated via a public access easement. The project proponent will construct the improvements, and the project’s HOA will handle ongoing private maintenance, adding further value to the dedication.

The proposed parkland has suitable topography, geology, access, size, shape, and location within the subdivision for public park use. It is relatively flat, free of geological constraints, accessible via streets with a public access easement, and sufficiently sized and shaped to support recreational activities. Dedication is appropriate, as no nearby park property exists where fees could be allocated for maintenance or improvements.

As noted, the proposed parkland addresses a need in an underserved area and supports General Plan goals. The well-designed parklands will meet the recreational needs of both project residents and the surrounding community.

The parks will be constructed as part of the project and will be accessible to project residents and the public, in compliance with City requirements.

Financial Considerations
The proposed project is not anticipated to create an adverse fiscal impact on the City of Cotati.

All costs for staff and consultant time and expenses related to project review, permitting, and inspection will be fully covered by the project applicant. The applicant is also required to pay all applicable development impact fees, including bed tax, park in-lieu, traffic, sewer connection, water connection, and water conservation fees. The development will increase the property’s value, resulting in higher property tax revenue for the City. Additionally, the property will be annexed into the City’s Community Facility District, which imposes a special tax on all parcels to fund public services, including: 1) maintenance of facilities, equipment, and vehicles; 2) police protection services; 3) maintenance and lighting of streets, roads, parks, parkways, and open space; 4) flood and stormwater protection services; and 5) salaries and benefits for staff directly providing these services. The proposed public parks will be maintained by the project’s HOA.

Environmental Issues
The CEQA Analysis (Attachment E), prepared by the City of Cotati as the lead agency, fully complies with the procedural and substantive requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines. The analysis tiers from the program-level analysis in the 2013 City of Cotati General Plan and its Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2013082037), certified in 2015.

The CEQA analysis adheres to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, which streamlines environmental review for projects by tiering from the program-level analysis of a certified General Plan EIR. Under Section 15183, projects consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was 157 of 539
certified require no additional environmental review, except to assess project-specific significant effects unique to the project or its site. This focuses the analysis on the project’s potential environmental impacts relative to those evaluated in the 2013 General Plan EIR.

The CEQA Analysis describes the project, its environmental setting, the site’s existing conditions, and applicable regulatory requirements. It also evaluates the project’s consistency with the City of Cotati General Plan. All relevant General Plan policies and mitigation measures from the 2013 General Plan EIR applicable to the project are identified and incorporated as environmental conditions of approval. The appendices referenced in the CEQA Analysis are available on the City’s website at: https://www.cotaticity.gov/228/Projects-in-Progress. 158 of 539
1185 Mason Street, Suite A – San Francisco, CA 94123 – www.cityventures.com

Redwood Row Project
Inclusionary Housing Plan
This Inclusionary Housing Plan has been prepared by City Ventures in accordance with Chapter

17.31.070 Compliance procedures of the Cotati Municipal Code.

Property Information & Affordable Requirement: The 10.62 (±) acres of real property is located in the City of Cotati (“City”), County of Sonoma, and is recognizable as the eastern portion of vacant land in on Highway 116, in between Redwood Drive and Alder Avenue – (APNs: 046-286-017 through 046-286-020). The site is a pipeline project in the City’s 2023 Housing Element. Per the City’s affordable housing requirements in Chapter 17.31.020, pertaining to for-sale residential units, a project must provide at least 15% of the base density as affordable, 24 total, restricted for occupancy by moderate-(5% of base density, or 8 units), low-(5% of base density, or 8 units) and very low-income-(5% of base density, or 8 units) households. The project has proposed 134 market rate homes and 44 deed restricted affordable homes, or 28% of the base density.

The project is proposing to provide twenty units beyond the 24 required in the City’s municipal code, which is also 19 units above what the City anticipated in its 2023 Housing Element (City of Cotati Housing Element Update 2023-2031).

Density Bonus: The State Density Bonus Law (SDBL) (Gov. Code, § 65915) applies to housing developments that include on-site affordable units and offers benefits such as increased density, development incentives or concessions, waivers, and modified parking ratios. The property has a General Plan land use designation of “General Commercial” and is located in Cotati’s “Commercial, Gravenstein Corridor” (CG) zoning district (Cotati Muni. Code, § 17.20.030.B), both of which allow mixed-use residential development at a density of up to 15 dwelling units per acre. With a lot size of

10.62 acres, the base density is calculated as 160 units, rounded up per state law. By setting aside eight units for very low-income households (>5% of base density), the project qualifies for a 20% density bonus, allowing up to 192 units, and is also eligible for one incentive or concession, unlimited waivers, and the use of specified parking ratios. (Gov. Code, § 65915, subds. (d), (f)(2), (e)(1), (p).)
159 of 539
1185 Mason Street, Suite A – San Francisco, CA 94123 – www.cityventures.com

Density Bonus Benefits (Related to Affordable Housing):

City Ventures has requested a concession and waivers under SDBL to the City of Cotati’s municipal code. Subdivision (d) of the Government Code (Sec 65915) states that a qualifying applicant (this project qualifies in that ≥5% of the base units would be for rent at very-low income levels) may submit to a city, county, or city and county a proposal for the specific incentives or concessions that the applicant requests as long as the incentives or concessions result in identifiable costs reductions consistent with subdivision (k). Subdivision (k) provides that concessions or incentives include regulatory incentives or concessions proposed by the developer or the city, county, or city and county that result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the Health and Safety Code, or for rents for the targeted units to be set as specified in subdivision (c). Subdivision (d) states that the city, county, or city and county shall grant the concession or incentive requested by the applicant unless the city, county, or city and county makes a written finding, based upon substantial evidence that the concession or incentive does not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions. This requirement is further discussed in several HCD letters, including its 2022 letter to the City of Watsonville and its 2022 letter to the City of Manhattan Beach.
160 of 539
1185 Mason Street, Suite A – San Francisco, CA 94123 – www.cityventures.com

The concession and waivers City Ventures has requested under SDBL to the City of Cotati’s municipal code are as follows:
161 of 539
1185 Mason Street, Suite A – San Francisco, CA 94123 – www.cityventures.com

Affordable Housing Site Plan:

Affordability Breakdown:

Affordability Category Number of Units Percentage of Base Density Very Low (≤ 50% AMI) 8 5%
Low (51 - 80% AMI) 8 5%
Moderate (81 - 120% AMI) 28 17.5%
Totals: 44 Units 28%
162 of 539
1185 Mason Street, Suite A – San Francisco, CA 94123 – www.cityventures.com

Unit Summary of Affordable Building:

The following forty-four affordable units are being proposed as rental. One hundred and thirty-four market rate units in this project are proposed as for-sale, with the exception of 33 optional ADU’s on the ground floor of the market rate units; these ADU’s would be for-rent.

Bedroom Count Number of Units Unit Size (Square Feet) Percentage of Building 1 Bedroom 21 ± 550 48%
2 Bedroom 12 ± 850 27%
3 Bedroom 11 ± 1150 25%
Totals: 44 Units ± 33,350 TOTAL 100%
Building Permits and Improvement Plans:

City Ventures intends to proceed with design development and construction documents for all market rate and affordable units concurrently. Grading & infrastructure work on both parcels shall commence concurrently. City Ventures, or its affordable housing development partner, shall commence vertical construction of the affordable units prior to the final COO of the market rate units, and acknowledges that the improvement bonds will be held by the City until completion of construction of the inclusionary units. Further details of construction timing and bonds will be provided in the project’s inclusionary housing agreement.

Marketing Plan:

City Ventures and/or its affordable partner will work with the City on the marketing, lottery, and leasing of the affordable units. Marketing shall include, but not be limited to:
 Running ads in the nearby papers:
o The Community Voice
o The Sonoma Index-Tribune
 Flyer/Email sent to local schools and local civic services. o Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District
o City of Cotati Web Page
 Web page specifically for the Cotati affordable housing program 163 of 539
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
(916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453
www.hcd.ca.gov
December 15, 2022
Suzi Merriam
Community Development Director
City of Watsonville
250 Main Street
Watsonville, CA 95076
Dear Suzi Merriam:

RE: 482 & 484 Beck Street – Letter of Technical Assistance The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is aware that the City of Watsonville (City) is reviewing an application for a housing development project located at 482 & 484 Beck Street (Project). HCD received a request for technical assistance from the Project applicant on October 14, 2022. The applicant expressed concerns that some of the requirements included by the City in its pre-application response letter, dated October 10, 2022, were contrary to the State Density Bonus Law (SDBL) (Gov. Code, § 65915). Specifically, the applicant disagreed with the City’s use of net acreage, rather than gross acreage, to calculate base density (and ultimately the density bonus) and the City’s requirement that the Project conform to (presumably all) R-1 Zoning District Regulations. The purpose of this letter is to provide technical assistance on this matter.

Background
HCD understands the Project proposes a 12-lot single family residential subdivision project to be located on an infill site. The Project would provide two for-sale units that would be affordable to moderate-income (MI) households and ten for-sale market rate units. The proposed Project utilizes the SDBL to achieve a density bonus of 15 percent (i.e., two units [rounded up]). The base density for the Project is ten units.1 1 1.159 gross acres multiplied by 7.99 dwelling units per acre (Low Density Residential [R-LD]) General Plan Land Use Designation) equals 10 units, rounded up. The General Plan density, rather than the Zoning Code density, applies per Government Code section 65915, subdivision (o)(5). 164 of 539
Suzi Merriam, Community Development Department

Page 2 ends

Gross Acreage vs. Net Acreage
The SDBL requires that base density calculations be performed using gross acreage, rather than net acreage. The distinction is made explicitly in Government Code section 65915, subdivision (f), by the appearance of the word “gross” in the first sentence. The word “gross” was added to the SDBL in 2016 by Assembly Bill 2501 (Chapter 758, Statutes of 2016). HCD recognizes that the City’s General Plan2 and Zoning Code3 call for the use of net acreage. However, the provisions of the SDBL supersede those of local governments in the event of a conflict. While there is no ambiguity in this case, HCD would like to further note that even if there were ambiguity, the SDBL contains a directive that it “be interpreted liberally in favor of producing the maximum number of total housing units.” (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (r)). The use of net acreage in the context of the Project would result in fewer housing units being produced because the area used for the access drive would be subtracted from the site area. HCD would also like to note that net acreage is typically less than gross acreage depending on a variety of potential site conditions beyond access drives. Examples include riparian areas, wetlands, steep slopes, easements, and any other condition that renders a portion of a site undevelopable.

Granting of Concessions and Development Standard Waivers The Project is entitled to one incentive/concession (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (d)(2)(A)) and a potentially unlimited number of development standard waivers (Gov.

Code, § 65915, subd. (e)). A project that meets the eligibility requirements of the SDBL is entitled to a density bonus, incentives/concessions, development standard waivers, and limited parking ratios (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (b)). The City must grant (i.e., “shall approve”) the specific incentives/concessions requested by the applicant unless the City makes written findings, based on substantial evidence, that the incentive/concession would (1) not result in a cost reduction, (2) have a specific adverse impact on health or safety (as defined), or (3) be contrary to state or federal law (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (d)). The City is also strictly limited in denying requested development standard waivers, preventing it from applying any development standard that would physically preclude a project as proposed unless doing so would have a specific adverse impact on health or safety (as defined) which could not be mitigated (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (e)). The City bears the burden of proof for the denial of a requested incentive/concession (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (d)(4)). HCD reminds the City that appellate courts have established (and continue to affirm) that local agencies cannot lawfully redesign a qualifying SDBL project on the theory that if the project were configured differently, it would not need the requested incentives/concessions and waivers. (Wollmer v. City of Berkeley (2011) 193 2 City of Watsonville 2005 General Plan, Chapter 4 Land Use and Community Development, p. 52. 3 City of Watsonville Municipal Code §14-16.205 (Minimum net land area.) 165 of 539
Suzi Merriam, Community Development Department

Page 3 ends

Cal.App.4th 1329, 1346-47.) The City must consider the Project as proposed, inclusive of any requested concessions and waivers.

Conclusion
HCD respects the challenges inherent in infill development, especially on unusually shaped sites surrounded by existing development. The City should be pragmatic in its consideration of the proposed Project. Given the long narrow shape of the Project site, it is likely that a considerable number of development standards will need to be modified or eliminated to facilitate the 12-lot subdivision. HCD would also like to remind the City that HCD has enforcement authority over the SDBL, among other state housing laws.

Accordingly, HCD may review local government actions and inactions to determine consistency with these laws. If HCD finds that a city’s actions do not comply with state law, HCD may notify the California Office of the Attorney General that the local government is in violation of state law (Gov. Code, § 65585, subd. (j)).

If you have questions or need additional information, please contact Brian Heaton at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Shannan West
Housing Accountability Unit Chief
166 of 539
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
(916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453
www.hcd.ca.gov
September 1, 2022
Mayor Steve Napolitano
Mayor Pro Tem Richard Montgomery
Council Members Joseph Franklin, Suzanne Hadley, and Hildy Stern City of Manhattan Beach
1400 Highland Avenue
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Mayor Steve Napolitano, Mayor Pro Tem Richard Montgomery, and Council Members Joseph Franklin, Suzanne Hadley, and Hildy Stern:

RE: City of Manhattan Beach, Highrose El Porto Multifamily Residential Development – Letter of Support and Technical Assistance The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) understands that the City of Manhattan Beach (City) City Council will soon be hearing an appeal of the Planning Commission’s upholding of the approval of the Highrose El Porto Multifamily Residential Development (Project) located at 401 Rosecrans Avenue (APN: 4137-001-031) and 3770 Highland Avenue (APN: 4137-001-027). The purpose of this letter is to express HCD’s support of the Project and to provide notice to the City that denying the Project may result in the violation of one or more of the state housing laws described in this letter.

HCD understands the Project proposes 79 units, including 73 market-rate units and 6 units affordable to very low-income (VLI) households. The project utilizes State Density Bonus Law (SDBL) (Gov. Code, § 65915) to achieve a 35-percent density bonus and is facilitated by several SDBL incentives/concessions and development standard waivers.

As described in the March 29, 2022, Director-approved permit, the Project qualifies for “streamlined, administrative, non-discretionary Precise Development Plan review, which subjects all components of the application to a ministerial review process.”1 Additionally, the Project has been verified by the City to be consistent with the General Plan, applicable physical development standards (except as lawfully modified via SDBL concessions and waivers), the Subdivision Map Act, and the certified Manhattan Beach 1 Tai, Carrie. Permit Approving Precise Development Plan and Related Entitlements, March 29, 2022, p 2.
167 of 539
Mayor Steve Napolitano, Mayor Pro Tem Richard Montgomery, and Council Members Joseph Franklin, Suzanne Hadley, and Hildy Stern

Page 2 ends

Local Coastal Program (LCP).2 The City determined that as a ministerial project, the Project is statutorily exempt from CEQA3 (i.e., no environmental review is required).

State Density Bonus Law (SDBL)
A project that meets the eligibility requirements of the SDBL is entitled to a density bonus, incentives/concessions, development standard waivers, and limited parking ratios (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (b)). The City must grant (i.e., “shall approve”) the specific incentives/concessions requested by the applicant unless the City makes written findings, based on substantial evidence, that the incentive/concession would (1) not result in a cost reduction, (2) have a specific adverse impact on health or safety (as defined), or (3) be contrary to state or federal law (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (d)). The City is also strictly limited in denying requested development standard waivers, preventing it from applying any development standard that would physically preclude the Project as proposed unless doing so would have a specific adverse impact on health or safety (as defined) which could not be mitigated (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (e)). The City bears the burden of proof for the denial of a requested incentive/concession (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (d)(4)).

Chapter A.94 (Affordable Housing Density Bonus and Incentive Program) of the City’s LCP incorporates the SDBL. The LCP provides that “[p]recise development plans are intended to encourage the development of affordable housing through a streamlined permitting process. Projects that qualify for a density bonus pursuant to Chapter A.94 shall be eligible for an administrative non-discretionary precise development plan” (MBLCP A.84.010).

Housing Accountability Act (HAA)
The Project meets the definition of a “housing development project” under the HAA (Gov. Code, § 65589.5, subd. (h)(3)). A “housing development project” that meets all objective standards (except those lawfully modified via SDBL concessions and waivers) may only be denied or approved at a lower density if the City makes written findings, supported by a preponderance of evidence on the record, that (1) a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety would result and (2) mitigation of the adverse impact is not possible (Gov. Code, § 65589.5, subd. (j)). The HAA also contains language pertaining to legal procedures and penalties.
2 Tai, Carrie. Memorandum re: Planning Commission Consideration of Project Appeal, June 8, 2022. 3 California Public Resources Code, § 21080.
168 of 539
Mayor Steve Napolitano, Mayor Pro Tem Richard Montgomery, and Council Members Joseph Franklin, Suzanne Hadley, and Hildy Stern

Page 3 ends

Housing Element Site Inventory
A review of City’s Draft Housing Element dated August 12, 2022, includes a description of the Project in Section 5 (Planned, Approved, and Prospective Projects) of Appendix E (Sites Analysis and Inventory). The Project is described as providing 79 units, including 73 above moderate-income units and six lower-income units, which is consistent with the Project about which the appeal is being heard by the City Council. This suggests that the City is prepared to permit the Project as proposed.

Conclusion
The State of California is in a housing crisis, and the provision of housing is a priority of the highest order. HCD encourages the City Council to approve the Project by upholding the Director’s (and subsequently, the Planning Commission’s) approval of the Project. The City Council should remain mindful of the City’s obligations under the SDBL and HAA as it considers the appeal. HCD would also like to remind the City that HCD has enforcement authority over the SDBL and HAA, among other state housing laws. Accordingly, HCD may review local government actions and inactions to determine consistency with these laws. If HCD finds that a city’s actions do not comply with state law, HCD may notify the California Office of the Attorney General that the local government is in violation of state law. (Gov. Code, § 65585, subd. (j).) If you have any questions regarding the content of this letter or would like additional technical assistance, please contact Brian Heaton at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Shannan West
Housing Accountability Unit Chief
169 of 539

www.coxcastle.com Los Angeles | Orange County | San Francisco Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP
50 California Street, Suite 3200
San Francisco, California 94111-4710
P: 415.262.5100 F: 415.262.5199
Linda C. Klein
415.262.5130
[email protected]
File No. 101136
November 7, 2023

VIA E-MAIL
Mr. Noah Housh
Director of Community Development
City of Cotati
201 West Sierra Avenue
Cotati, CA 94931
[email protected]
Re: State Density Bonus Request Letter for Redwood Row Project Dear Mr. Housh:

On behalf of our client, City Ventures, we are submitting this State Density Bonus Law (“SDBL”) request for City Ventures’ proposed mixed use project consisting of 167 residential units and approximately 10,000 square feet of commercial space (the “Project”).1 The Project would front on the Gravenstein Highway, just to the west of U.S. 101 and south of the Lowe’s Home Improvement (APN Nos. 046-286-017 to -020) (the “Property”), in the City of Cotati (the “City”). Thirty-four units would be affordable rental units, with at least eight of these 34 units offered at levels affordable to very low income households.2 As set forth below, the Project qualifies for a density bonus, incentives and concessions, and waivers. This letter is organized in three parts. Part 1 describes the Project’s qualification to request the benefits provided under the SDBL, including a density bonus in the first instance.3 Part 2 provides a legal summary of provisions in the SDBL regarding incentives, concessions, and waivers. Part 3 identifies City Ventures’ specific requests under the SDBL for the Project. It also reserves the right to update and/or amend these requests in the future as needed. 1 The Property previously was mass graded in connection with an approved shopping center project. 2 The remainder of these 34 affordable units would be divided, first, according to the City’s inclusionary housing requirements, with the remaining 10 units distributed across RHNA income categories. 3 The City also has a local density bonus ordinance. In the event of conflict, state law controls. 170 of 539
Noah Housh
November 7, 2023

Page 2 ends

1. Project Qualification Under the SDBL
The SDBL applies to “housing development” projects4 that provide on-site affordable housing and offers four categories of benefits: increased density over the maximum residential density that otherwise would be allowed; certain incentives and/or concessions; waivers; and an option to use certain vehicular parking ratios. (Gov. Code, § 65915.) The density bonus and the number of incentives and/or concessions depends on the number and type of affordable units.

The first step in determining SDBL benefits is to calculate “base density.”5 The Property has a General Plan land use designation of “General Commercial” (“GC”) and is located in the “Commercial, Gravenstein Corridor” (“CG”) zoning district (Muni. Code, § 17.20.030.B), both of which allow for mixed use residential uses at a density of up to 15 dwelling units per acre.

Applied to the 10.41-acre Property, this results in a “base density” of up to 157 residential units for the Project (i.e., 10.41 acres x 15 du/acre = 156.15, rounded up per the SDBL to 157 units).

Note that, under the SDBL, each component of any density calculation resulting in fractional units, including “base” and “bonus” densities, is rounded up to the next whole number. (Gov.

Code, § 65915, subd. (q).) This state law provision would take precedence over any local provision directing a density calculation to be rounded down. Even if rounded down to 156 units, however, the Project would still comply with any ultimate density bonus calculation.

The second step is to determine the percentage and level of affordable units. The Project proposes to set aside at least eight units at levels affordable to very low-income households.

These units, which are five percent of the “base” density, entitle the Project to a 20 percent density bonus. (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (f)(2).) Applied to the Project, this would allow for up to 189 residential units (157 x 1.2 = 188.4, rounded up to 189), which in turn provides for the Project’s 167 total units. In addition, the Project also would be entitled to receive one incentive or concession (id. § 65915, subd. (d)(2)(A)), an unlimited number of waivers (id. § 65915, subd. (e)(1)), and the use of certain parking ratios (id. § 65915, subd. (p)), as specified below.

2. Incentives, Concessions, and Waivers
(a) Incentives and Concessions
An incentive or concession is a reduction in development standards or modification of zoning or architectural requirements, or any other regulatory incentive or concession proposed by the developer, that results in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs. (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (k).) The California Housing and Community Development Department (“HCD”) has taken the position that the SDBL “clearly indicates that requirements beyond development standards are eligible” as incentives or concessions, including 4 A “housing development” is defined for purposes of the SDBL as “a development project for five or more residential units, including mixed-use developments.” (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (i).) 5 “Base density” under the SDBL means “the maximum number of units allowed under the zoning ordinance, specific plan, or land use element of the general plan.” (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (o)(6).) 171 of 539
Noah Housh
November 7, 2023

Page 3 ends

“regulatory requirements,” provided that the request has identifiable and actual cost reductions. (HCD Letter of Inquiry and Technical Assistance to City of San Jose, Dec. 14, 2021, at p. 3.6) Courts have explained that an applicant is not required to prove that a requested incentive or concession would lead to cost reductions. Rather, specific requests are “presumed” to result in cost reductions, and an agency bears the burden to demonstrate otherwise if it intends to deny a request. (See Bankers Hill 150 v. City of San Diego (2022) 74 Cal.App.5th 755, 770 [citing Schreiber v. City of Los Angeles (2021) 69 Cal.App.5th 549, 555].) Likewise, while an applicant may be required to provide a basic explanation as to why a project is eligible to receive an incentive or concession (e.g., drawings and the like), an agency cannot require preparation of a supporting report or study. (See, e.g., HCD Notice of Violation to City of Encinitas, March 25, 2021, at pp. 3–4 [“The Legislature was clear that no additional studies, reports, or analysis were to be required.”].7) Cost reductions, HCD has noted, “should be apparent from the project application, thus negating any need for ‘financial analysis or report.’ ” (Id.) An agency must grant an incentive or concession unless it can make written findings, based on substantial evidence, according to certain statutory limitations. The only reasons to deny an incentive or concession are if: (i) the incentive or concession would not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions; (ii) the incentive or concession would have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety, and there is no feasible way to mitigate or avoid that impact without rendering the development unaffordable to low income and moderate income households; (iii) the incentive or concession would have an adverse impact on any real property listed in the California Register of Historical Resources; or (iv) the incentive or concession would be contrary to state or federal law. (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (d)(1).) The agency bears the burden of proof for the denial of an incentive or concession. (Id. § 65915, subd. (d)(4).) (b) Waivers
In addition to incentives or concessions, a developer may request waivers of any development standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a development at the density or with the incentives or concessions permitted by the SDBL. (Gov.

Code, § 65915, subd. (e)(1).) “Development standards” are defined broadly as “a site or construction condition, including, but not limited to, a height limitation, a setback requirement, a floor area ratio, an onsite open-space requirement, or a parking ratio that applies to a residential development pursuant to any ordinance, general plan element, specific plan, charter, or other local condition, law, policy, resolution, or regulation.” (Id., subd. (o)(1).) Waivers can be requested for “any development standard that will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a development” that meets the SDBL’s minimum affordable requirements “at the densities or with the concessions or incentives permitted by [SDBL].” (Id., subd. (e)(1).) 6 https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/docs/sclSanJose-LOI-TA-121421.pdf. 7 https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/docs/sdiencinitas-nov-densitybonus03252021.pdf. 172 of 539
Noah Housh
November 7, 2023

Page 4 ends

An applicant is entitled to unlimited waivers. (Id.) A local government may deny a requested waiver under certain, limited circumstances. Specifically, a local government may deny a requested waiver only if granting the waiver “would have a specific, adverse impact . . . upon health or safety, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact” or “would have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources, or to grant any waiver or reduction that would be contrary to state or federal law.” (Id.) Conditions that would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety “arise infrequently.” (Id. § 65589.5, subd. (a)(3).) A local government can require “an applicant to provide reasonable documentation to establish eligibility” for a requested waiver or reduction of a development standard. (Id. § 65915, subd. (a)(2).) According to HCD, the “showing or ‘reasonable documentation’ required by the applicant is that the project qualifies for a density bonus.” (HCD’s Notice of Violation Letter to the City of Encinitas, Jan. 20, 2022.8) HCD also has concluded that “[a] project that meets the requirements of the [SDBL] is entitled to waivers if they are needed, ‘period.’” (Id., quoting Wollmer v. City of Berkeley (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1329, 1346–1347.) A recent Court of Appeals case has further confirmed that a local agency cannot deny a requested waiver based on whether a developer could have designed its project in a way that minimizes the need for requested waivers. (Bankers Hill 150, supra, 74 Cal.App.5th 755.) In Bankers Hill 150, project opponents claimed that the project could be redesigned to be more consistent with the city’s development standards and thus the city should have denied the requested waivers. The court rejected that argument, holding that the city could not demand the developer to redesign its building to better meet the city’s development standards even if a design existed that would allow fewer deviations than the proposed project. (Id. at p. 775.) In addition, HCD has clarified that a waiver must be granted if it is necessary to facilitate a requested incentive or concession. (HCD Letter of Technical Assistance to the City of San Jose, May 20, 2022.9)

3. City Ventures’s Specific Requests Under the SDBL
City Ventures makes the following specific requests under the SDBL. It also reserves the right to update and/or amend these requests in the future as the application process continues. (a) Density Bonus
As noted above, City Ventures is entitled to a density bonus of 20 percent over the otherwise allowed “base density” of 157 residential units. Consistent with that bonus, City Ventures requests a density bonus of just over 8 percent to allow for the Project’s 167 units. 8 https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/docs/sdiencinitas-nov-012022.pdf. 9 http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/docs/sclSanJose-TA-052022.pdf. 173 of 539
Noah Housh
November 7, 2023

Page 5 ends

(b) Incentive/Concession
City Ventures requests the following incentive/concession under the SDBL. (i) Location of Inclusionary Units
The City’s inclusionary housing ordinance states that, except as otherwise provided, “inclusionary units shall be dispersed throughout a residential development.” (Muni. Code, § 17.31.040.A.) This requirement would prohibit a developer from effectively competing for tax credit financing and other lower cost financing that results in identifiable and actual cost reductions for affordable housing. City Ventures wishes to access such funding available to competitive, 100 percent affordable housing projects and thus requests an incentive/concession from the City’s dispersal requirements to allow the Project’s 34 affordable stacked flats or apartment units to be developed on one parcel in the northeast corner of the Property. (c) Waivers
City Ventures requests the following waivers from the applicable zoning standards and criteria of the CG zoning district, application of which would physically preclude construction of the Project at the density and with the incentive/concession permitted under the SDBL. (i) Height
City Ventures requests a waiver of the 35-foot height limit in the CG zoning district (Muni. Code, § 17.24.030 [Table 2-13]) to allow for Project building heights up to 45 feet.

Increased building heights are needed to accommodate the proposed residential units along with accompanying Project site amenities and nonresidential uses. Absent this waiver, application of this development standard would preclude construction of the proposed housing development project at the permitted density and with the incentive/concession permitted under the SDBL. (ii) Accessibility Requirements for Multifamily Projects The City’s multifamily requirements state that multifamily projects of five or more units “shall be designed and constructed so that a minimum of ten percent of the units are one-story, and shall include features to provide for disabled accessibility, including wide doors, grab bars, etc., as determined by the review authority.” (Muni. Code, § 17.42.120.B.) City Ventures requests a waiver from this requirement to allow all of the Project’s units to be constructed as proposed, with amenities also as proposed.10 Absent this waiver, application of this development standard would preclude construction of the proposed housing development project at the permitted density and with the incentive/concession permitted under the SDBL. 10 Separately, the Project would comply with ADA/Building Code and any state law accessibility requirements, including that 10 percent of the units would be ADA accessible/adaptable as required under the Building Code. 174 of 539
Noah Housh
November 7, 2023

Page 6 ends

(iii) Minimum FAR for Nonresidential Use
The City’s mixed-use requirements provide that the nonresidential use components of mixed-use projects in the CG zoning district must have a minimum FAR of 0.25. (Muni. Code, § 17.42.100.B.1.) City Ventures requests a waiver from this requirement to allow for an FAR of approximately 0.02 (i.e., 10,000 square feet of proposed commercial use / 10.41 acres [453,459.6 square feet] = .022). This waiver is needed to allow for the proposed housing density on the site with the accompanying Project amenities as designed. Absent this waiver, application of this development standard would preclude construction of the proposed housing development project at the permitted density and with the incentive/concession permitted under the SDBL. (iv) Setbacks
City Ventures requests waivers from the setback requirements of the CG zoning district (see Muni. Code, § 17.24.030 [Table 2-13])) to allow for minimum Project setbacks as follows:
(i) front, 0 feet; (ii) side, 10 feet; and (iii) rear, 15 feet if abutting residential, none otherwise.

The above setbacks are needed to accommodate the proposed residential units along with Project site amenities and nonresidential uses. Absent these waivers, application of these development standards would preclude construction of the proposed housing development project at the permitted density and with the incentive/concession permitted under the SDBL. * * *
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. We look forward to working with the City to bring needed housing, including affordable housing, to the area.

Sincerely,
Linda C. Klein
101136\17105747
175 of 539
| 201 West Sierra Avenue | Cotati, CA 94931 | www.cotaticity.org | April 29, 2025
Below is a summary of the City’s projected residential development, including how the identified projects would contribute to Cotati’s sixth-cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). These projections are specific to “pipeline” projects which have been approved, or projects which have been deemed “complete” and are nearing a decision point. These projections do not include development projects which are early in the review process or individual homes and Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) that have been constructed or are under construction, which will also contribute toward the City’s RHNA compliance.

Very Low Low Moderate Market Rate
RHNA
Allocation
60 34 39 101
Cotati Village 1 18 159
Cotati Village 2 13 113
Flahaven Estates 1 2 2 30
120 E. Cotati Ave 10 33 1
Redwood Row 8 8 28 134
Total Projected
Pipeline Units
50 43 30 437
The City’s RHNA current compliance status may be found below and on the City of Cotati Housing webpage: https://www.cotaticity.gov/Archive.aspx?AMID=54 176 of 539
Letter to Ken Molinaro
6/27/2018 Page 2 of 2
177 of 539
COTATI
COTATI CALI)ORNIA
APPLICANT:

CITY VENTURES
444 SPEAR STREET SUITE 200
SAN )RANCISCO CA
4105
CONTACT: SAMANTHA HAUSER
Vice President of Development
PHONE: 4.522.420
E-MAIL: VDPDQWKD#FLW\YHQWXUHV.FRP
ZZZ.FLW\YHQWXUHV.FRP
PRELIMINARY DR SUBMITTAL DATE: 05.25.2022
2QG RESUBMITTAL DATE: 12.15.2023
3UG RESUBMITTAL DATE: 10.04.2024
4WK RESUBMITTAL DATE: 11.14.2024
5WK RESUBMITTAL DATE: 03.17.2025

LOCATION MAP
ARCHITECT:

HUNT HALE JONES ARCHITECTS
444 SPEAR STREET SUITE 105
SAN )RANCISCO CA
4105
CONTACT: DAN HALE
Architect
PHONE: 415.5.333
E-MAIL: GKDOH#KKMD.FRP
ZZZ.KKMD.FRP
ENGINEER:

CSW-ST2 ENGINEERING
45 LEVERONI COURT
NOVATO CA
54 4

CONTACT: .IR. BOVIT=
PHONE: 415.4.44
E-MAIL: NLUNE#FVZVW2.FRP
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:

C2 COLLABORATIVE
41 N. EL CAMINO REAL
SAN CLEMENTE CA
272
CONTACT: CRISTOPER )ORTUNATO
PHONE:
4 .542.7703
E-MAIL: FIRUWXQDWR#F2FROODERUDWLYH.FRP

SITE LOCATION
UTILITY CONSULTANS:

TARRAR
13 )IRST ST.

BRENTWOOD CA
4513
CONTACT: AL)ON=O REYES
PHONE:
4 .240.25
5 E-MAIL: DUH\HV#WDUUDU.FRP
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:

QUANTUM GEOTECHNICAL
1110 BURBETT AVE. SUITE B
CONCORD CA
4520
CONTACT: SIMON MA.DESSI
PHONE:

25.7.2751
E-MAIL: VLPRQP#TXDQWXPJHRWHFKQLFDO.FRP
Z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Cover\317068_Cover.dwg, 3/17/2025 3:45:58 PM, yanni 178 of 539
SCALE:

PROJECT OVERVIEW
A0.1
N.T.S.

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S

AUFKLWHFWXUHPODQQLQJIQWHULRUV
444 SSHDU SWUHHW SXLWH 105
SDQ )UDQFLVFR CA
4105
ZZZ.KXQWKDOHMRQHV.FRP
W. 415-512-1300
I. 415-2-02
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALI)ORNIA

11.14.2024
310.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Cover\317068_Cover.dwg, 11/14/2024 11:03:25 AM, yanni 179 of 539
SCALE:

CONCEPT. COMMERC. BLDG. FROM GRAVENSTEIN HW.

A0.1.1
N.T.S.

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Cover\317068_Cover.dwg, 11/21/2024 8:01:54 AM, yanni 180 of 539
SCALE:

CONCEPT. AFFORDABLE HOUSING FROM INTERIOR AISLE
A0.1.2
N.T.S.

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Cover\317068_Cover.dwg, 11/21/2024 8:01:55 AM, yanni 181 of 539

ARCHITECTURAL

COVER SHEET
A PRO-ECT OVERVIE:

A CONCEPT CO00ERC BLDG FRO0 GRAVENSTEIN H:
A CONCEPT AFFORDABLE HOUSING FRO0 INTERIOR AISLE A TABLE OF CONTENT
A SITE PHOTOS
A SITE ANAL<SIS CONTEXT 0AP
A RENDERED SITE PLAN
A PRELI0INAR< SITE PLAN
A PRO-ECT DATA UNIT BLDG SU00AR<
A DENSIT< BONUS SU00AR<

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A BLDG A CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
A BLDG A CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
A BLDG PLEX CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
A BLDG PLEX CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS

UNIT PLANS
A PLAN CO00ERCIAL UNIT
A PLAN END CO00ERCIAL UNIT
A PLAN
A PLAN EXTENDED PORCH
A PLAN X 0ETER
A PLAN X EXTENDED PORCH
A PLAN ADU FLOOR PLAN

CONCEPTUAL UNIT SECTIONS

BUILDINGS
A BLDG A

PLEX 0IXED

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG A

PLEX 0IXED
0AIN FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG A

PLEX 0IXED

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG A

PLEX 0IXED

ROOF PLAN
A BLDG B
PLEX 0IXED

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG B
PLEX 0IXED
0AIN FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG B
PLEX 0IXED

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG C
PLEX
GROUND 0AIN FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG C
PLEX

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG D
PLEX

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG D
PLEX
0AIN FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG D
PLEX

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG A
PLEX

ROOF PLAN
A BLDG E
PLEX

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG E
PLEX
0AIN FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG E
PLEX

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG N
PLEX
GROUND 0AIN FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG N
PLEX

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG U
PLEX

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG U
PLEX
0AIN FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG U
PLEX

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG V
PLEX
GROUND 0AIN FLOOR PLAN
A BLDG V
PLEX

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A
BLDG :
PLEX

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A
BLDG :
PLEX
0AIN FLOOR PLAN
A
BLDG :
PLEX

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A CO00UNIT< BLDG FLOOR PLAN FRONT ELEVATION
A CONCEPTUAL TRASH ENCLOSURE

AFFORDABLE HOUSING
A CONCEPTUAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING SITE
A CONCEPTUAL AFFORDABLE BUILDING FLOOR PLAN
A CONCEPTUAL AFFORDABLE BUILDING ELEVATIONS
CIVIL
C VESTING TENTATIVE 0AP
C COLORED 0AP EXHIBITS
C EXISTING CONDITIONS
C PRELI0INAR< UTILIT< PLAN
C PRELI0INAR< GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C HORI=ONTAL CONTROL STRIPING PLAN
C STOR0:ATER CONTROL PLAN
C STOR0:ATER CONTROL TABLES
C SECTIONS
C UTILIT< PROFILES
C UTILIT< PROFILES
C UTILIT< PROFILES
C PRELI0INAR< OFFSITE I0PROVE0ENT PLAN
C ULTI0ATE OFFSITE LA<OUT
C
ACCESS PLAN

LANDSCAPE
L CONCEPTUAL DESIGN I0AGER<
L CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
L CONCEPTUAL PUBLIC PAR. PLAN
L CONCEPTUAL CENTRAL PAR. PLAN
L CONCEPTUAL :OONERF ALLE< PLAN
L CONCEPTUAL :ALL AND FENCE PLAN
L CONCEPTUAL PLANT PALETTE AND I0AGER<
L :OONERF I0AGER<

TABLE OF CONTENTS

C H U N T H A L E - O N E S A R C H I T E C T S

AUFKLWHFWXUHPODQQLQJIQWHULRUV
SSHDU SWUHHW SXLWH
SDQ FUDQFLVFR CA

ZZZKXQWKDOHMRQHVFRP
W
I
DATE

PRO-ECT

CIT< VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

SCALE

TABLE OF CONTENT
A
NTS
Z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Cover\317068_Cover.dwg, 11/21/2024 8:06:13 AM, yanni

CONCEPTUAL COLOR & MATERIALS
C&M-001
C&M-002
C&M-003
C&M-004
182 of 539
SCALE:

SITE PHOTOS
A0.3
N.T.S.

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S

AUFKLWHFWXUHPODQQLQJIQWHULRUV
444 SSHDU SWUHHW SXLWH 105
SDQ FUDQFLVFR CA
4105
ZZZ.KXQWKDOHMRQHV.FRP
W. 415-512-1300
I. 415-2-02
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
3170.00
From the Southeast portion of the site looking West on Gravenstein Hwy.

From the North portion of the site looking South onto the site.

From the Southwest portion of the site looking East along Gravenstein Hwy. z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Cover\317068_Cover.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:36:28 AM, yanni 183 of 539
NORTH
LOWES

GRAVENSTEIN HWY W COTATI AVE

EXISTING

COMMERCIAL
REDWOOD DR HWY 101 HWY 101

EXISTING

COMMERCIAL

ALDER AVE

HELMAN LN

ZONNING

GC - COMMERCIAL

GRAVENSTEIN

CORRIDOR

GRAVENSTEIN HWY

EXISTING

RESIDENTIAL

CHINA VILLAGE

RESTAURANT
SCALE

SITE ANALYSIS CONTEXT MAP
A0.4
1 200

C H U N T H A L E - O N E S A R C H I T E C T S

AUFKLWHFWXUHPODQQLQJIQWHULRUV
444 SSHDU SWUHHW SXLWH 105
SDQ )UDQFLVFR CA
4105
ZZZ.KXQWKDOHMRQHV.FRP
W. 415-512-1300
I. 415-2-02
DATE

PRO-ECT

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALI)ORNIA

03.17.2025
3170.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\SP\317068_Cotati_SP.dwg, 3/18/2025 8:45:27 AM, yanni 184 of 539

SITE PLAN
NORTH
0 50
100
200

SCALE
1 50

150

GRAVENSTEIN HIGHWAY
SCALE

RENDERED SITE PLAN
A0.4.1
1 50
- 0

C H U N T H A L E - O N E S A R C H I T E C T S

AUFKLWHFWXUHPODQQLQJIQWHULRUV
444 SSHDU SWUHHW SXLWH 105
SDQ )UDQFLVFR CA
4105
ZZZ.KXQWKDOHMRQHV.FRP
W. 415-512-1300
I. 415-2-02
DATE

PRO-ECT

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALI)ORNIA

03.17.2025
3170.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\SP\317068_Cotati_SP.dwg, 3/18/2025 8:45:34 AM, yanni 185 of 539
NO

PARKING
NO

PARKING

VAN VAN

PARKING
NO VAN

BLDG B BLDG A

BLDG C BLDG CC

BLDG V BLDG T BLDG BB
BLDG U
BLDG S

BLDG AA BLDG Z BLDG Y BLDG X BLDG W
BLDG D
BLDG E

BLDG ) BLDG G
BLDG H

BLDG I BLDG - BLDG K BLDG L BLDG M

BLDG N GRAVENSTEIN HWY
BLDG. B
7 UNITS
BLDG. E UNITS
BLDG. X 5 UNITS
BLDG. W 5 UNITS
BLDG. ) UNITS
BLDG. L UNITS BLDG. M
UNITS
BLDG. - UNITS BLDG. K
UNITS BLDG. Y 5 UNITS
BLDG. Z
UNITS
BLDG. AA
UNITS
BLDG. S
3 UNITS
BLDG. A

UNITS
BLDG. U
UNITS
BLDG. H UNITS BLDG. I UNITS
BLDG. G UNITS BLDG. C 3 UNITS
BLDG. T
3 UNIT
BLDG. BB
4 UNIT
BLDG. D UNITS BLDG. CC 3 UNITS BLDG. V 4 UNITS
BLDG. N
3 UNITS

-21
4
T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL )OR LV SPACE
PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P. T.P. T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK METER TESTBLOCK HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL )OR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL )OR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER SPACE )OR LV HOUSE PANEL MAIN PULL METER STACK T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER SPACE )OR LV HOUSE PANEL MAIN PULL METER STACK T.P. T.P. T.P. STACK METER TESTBLOCK METER PANEL HOUSE )OR LV SPACE PULL MAIN STACK METER T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. METERSTACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL )OR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL )OR LV SPACE
PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P. T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL )OR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P. T.P. METER
STACK METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER

STACK UP
T.P.

T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP

METER STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL )OR LV SPACE
PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P. UP T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
METER STACK METER TESTBLOCK HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P. UP T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP

METER STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL )OR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER STACK
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP T.P. UP
METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL )OR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. UP T.P. UP T.P. UP METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER SPACE )OR LV HOUSE PANEL MAIN PULL METER STACK T.P. UP T.P. UP T.P. UP T.P. UP METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER SPACE )OR LV HOUSE PANEL MAIN PULL METER STACK T.P. UP T.P. UP T.P. UP STACK METER TESTBLOCK METER PANEL HOUSE )OR LV SPACE PULL MAIN STACK METER T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP T.P. UP
METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL )OR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP T.P. UP
METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER

STACK SITE PLAN
NORTH
0 50
100
200

SCALE
1 50

150

T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. UP
T.P. UP T.P. UP
METER
STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK
2
-0
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP

METER STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL )OR LV SPACE
PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P. UP
T.P. UP
E.4. E.4. E.4.

T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP METER STACK
TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL )OR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER STACK
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP T.P. UP
METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP T.P. UP
METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK

- 21
-
BLDG. B
7 UNITS
BLDG. X 5 UNITS
BLDG. W 5 UNITS
BLDG. ) UNITS
BLDG. L UNITS BLDG. M
UNITS
BLDG. - UNITS BLDG. K
UNITS BLDG. Y 5 UNITS
BLDG. Z
UNITS
BLDG. AA
UNITS
BLDG. S
3 UNITS
BLDG. A

UNITS
BLDG. U
UNITS
BLDG. H UNITS BLDG. I UNITS
BLDG. G UNITS BLDG. C 3 UNITS
BLDG. T
3 UNIT
BLDG. BB
4 UNIT
2
-0 2
-0
2
-0 2
-0 2
-0
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
T.P. UP T.P. UP
METER STACK TESTBLOCK METER HOUSE PANEL SPACE )OR LV PULL MAIN METER STACK BLDG. D UNITS 5 -0 5
-0 1
-7
34
7 1
2 1
-0
3 4
1
-4
1 4
1
-
2
-0
32 -0 BLDG. CC 3 UNITS BLDG. V 4 UNITS35
-0 37
-2 1
-0
2
-0

-0
10 -0
2
-0
2 -10
37 -41
2
30 -0
2
-0
2
-0
2
-0
2
-0
2
-0
2
-0
2
-0
2
-0
1 2

-0
4 -0
24 -0
32 -0
2
-0
32 -0
32 -0
2
-
2
-
3
-0
110
-0
32 -0 2
-0
110
-0
305
-
110
-0
110
-0
2
-
5 -0
15 -0
17 -0
15 -0
17 -0
12 -0 20
-0
17 -10 24
-4
15 -0
15 -0
17 -10
17 -10
T.P. UP
T.P. UP
METER
STACK METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
)OR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. UP BLDG. N
3 UNITS
7 -11
1 2

20 -0
2
-0

-10
(E)TREE
PLAZA
GRAVENSTEIN HIGHWAY REDWOOD DRIVE(12) COMM. (11) COMM. (4) COMM.

BIKE LANE BIKE LANE BIKE LANE
(3)
(2)
(2) BIKE LANE BIKE LANE BIKE LANE BIKE LANE
(7)
COMM.
(11)
(1)
(3)
(7)
(7)
COMM.
(3)
2) RES.

BLDG. E UNITS
4

PARKING
NO VAN
A)). BLDG. 44 UNITS
(57)
SCALE

PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
A0.5
1 50
- 0

C H U N T H A L E - O N E S A R C H I T E C T S

AUFKLWHFWXUHPODQQLQJIQWHULRUV
444 SSHDU SWUHHW SXLWH 105
SDQ )UDQFLVFR CA
4105
ZZZ.KXQWKDOHMRQHV.FRP
W. 415-512-1300
I. 415-2-02
DATE

PRO-ECT

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALI)ORNIA

03.17.2025
3170.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\SP\317068_Cotati_SP.dwg, 3/18/2025 8:45:41 AM, yanni 186 of 539

UNIT SUMMARY - TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUMS
PLAN NUMBER TOT. UNITS UNITS LIVING (SF) COMM. (SF) DECKS (SF) GARAGE (SF) LIVING

GARAGE (SF)

UNITS X
(LIVGAR) COMM. (SF) TOT. LIVING(SF)
PLAN 1 - (3 BD - 3 BTH OPT. ADU4 BD) 1 12 213 1
5 55 274 43
34
2
** PLAN 5 - (3 BD - 3.5 BTH OPT. ADU4 BD) 72 54 175 51 4 221 127
2 12700
** PLAN 5X - (3 BD - 3.5 BTH OPT. ADU4BD.) 4 34 10 51 500 230 1007 307 40 TOTAL LIV.
GARAGE
3123 TOTAL LIV. 24504
PLAN 1 - COMMERCIAL (INT) 12 - 55 - - 7020
PLAN 1 - COMMERCIAL (END) 4 - 753 - - 3012
TOTAL COMM. 10032

TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNIT
134 DU W
33 OPT.

ADU
S

GRAND TOTAL
(LIVGAR
COMM.)
322
TOTAL COMMERCIAL UNIT 1 TOTAL SITE 437342 SF
DUA : 134
.4 ACRES 14. DUA FAR 0.74
BLDG. SUMMARY
BLDGS. PLANS TOTAL
PLAN 1 PLAN 2
(OMIT)
PLAN 3
(OMIT)
PLAN 4
(OMIT) PLAN 5 PLAN 5X COMM
BLDG. A (
) UNITS
- - - -

DU
CU
BLDG. B (7) UNITS 7 - - - - 7 7 DU7 CU
BLDG. C (3) UNITS - - - - 1 2 - 3 DU0 CU
BLDG. D () UNITS - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. E () UNITS OFFSET - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. F () UNITS - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. G () UNITS - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. H () UNITS - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. I () UNITS - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. J () UNITS - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. K () UNITS - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. L () UNITS - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. M () UNITS - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. N (3) UNITS ROTATED - - - - 1 2 - 3 DU0 CU
BLDG. S (3) UNITS - - - - 1 2 - 3 DU0 CU
BLDG. T (3) UNITS - - - - 1 2 - 3 DU0 CU
BLDG. U () UNITS - - - - 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. V (4) UNITS - - - - 2 2 - 4 DU0 CU
BLDG. W (5) UNITS - - - - 3 2 - 5 DU0 CU
BLDG. X (5) UNITS - - - - 3 2 - 5 DU0 CU
BLDG. Y (5) UNITS - - - - 3 2 - 5 DU0 CU
BLDG. Z () UNITS - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. AA () UNITS - - - - 4 2 - DU0 CU
BLDG. BB (4) UNITS - - - - 2 2 - 4 DU0 CU
BLDG. CC (3) UNITS - - - - 1 2 - 3 DU0 CU
SUB TOTAL 1 - - - 72 4 1
TOTAL 1 TOTAL 134 DU1 CU
NOTE:

DU DWELLING UNIT

CU COMMERCIAL UNIT
FIRE SUPRESSION SYSTEM TO BE NFPA 13

AFFORDABLE SITE

UNIT SUMMARY
BEDROOM SQ. FT. NO OF
UNITS
1 BD 550 21
2 BD 50 12
3 BD 1150 11
TOTAL 44
** REFER TO SHEET A2. FOR ADU FLOOR PLAN

AFFORDABLE SITE

PARKING SUMMARY
BEDROOM REQUIRED REQUIRED PROVIDED
1 BD 550 21
2 BD 50 1
3 BD 1150 17
TOTAL 5
NOTE:

APPLICANT MAY ADJUST UNIT MIX AND BEDROOM SIZE AS NEEDED TO MEET AFFORDABLE REQUIREMENTS AS APPROVED BY PLANNING
SCALE:

PROJECT DATA UNIT BLDG SUMMARY
A0.
NTS

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S

AUFKLWHFWXUHPODQQLQJIQWHULRUV
444 SSHDU SWUHHW SXLWH 105
SDQ FUDQFLVFR CA
4105
ZZZ.KXQWKDOHMRQHV.FRP
W. 415-512-1300
I. 415-2-02
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
3170.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\SP\317068_Cotati_SP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:37:22 AM, yanni 187 of 539
SCALE:

DENSITY BONUS SUMMARY
A0..2
NTS

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S

AUFKLWHFWXUHPODQQLQJIQWHULRUV
444 SSHDU SWUHHW SXLWH 105
SDQ FUDQFLVFR CA
4105
ZZZ.KXQWKDOHMRQHV.FRP
W. 415-512-1300
I. 415-2-02
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
3170.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\SP\317068_Cotati_SP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:37:32 AM, yanni 188 of 539

RIGHT ELEVATION
BLDG. A 14'-0"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE 4'-4" 25'-1" 44'-0"
HEIGHT LIMIT 45' - 0"
SIGNAGE 14'-0"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE 29'-5
1 4
" 44'-0"

FRONT ELEVATION
BLDG. A

SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SIGNAGE
HEIGHT LIMIT 45' - 0"

SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SIGNAGE
4 3 2 1 5 6 7
14 9
13 16 12

FINISH SCHEDULE
1 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF
2 CORBEL W/ KICKER
3 HORIZONTAL RAILING
4 HARDI BOARD + BATT SIDING
5 STUCCO FINISH
6 HARDI HORIZONTAL SIDING
7 SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS
8 ENTRY DOOR
9 FRENCH DOOR
10 MANDOOR
11 STYLIZED LIGHT AND ADDRESS
12 COMMERCIAL LIGHTING
13 STOREFRONT GLAZING
14 STOREFRONT DOOR
15 TRELLIS
16 BRICK/STONE VENEER

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
SCALE:

BLDG. A CONCEPTUAL FRONT & RIGHT EE
A1.1.1
1/8" = 1'-0"
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\9 Plex\EE\317068_9 Plex_SK_EE.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:56:13 AM, yanni 189 of 539
14'-0"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE 29'-5
1 4
" 44'-0"

F F F REAR ELEVATION
BLDG. A
HEIGHT LIMIT 45' - 0"

F F F F F F
2 1 4
5 6 7
16 8 11

LEFT ELEVATION
BLDG. A 14'-0"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE 4'-4" 25'-1" 44'-0"
HEIGHT LIMIT 45' - 0"

SIGNAGE
10 FINISH SCHEDULE
1 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF
2 CORBEL W/ KICKER
3 HORIZONTAL RAILING
4 HARDI BOARD + BATT SIDING
5 STUCCO FINISH
6 HARDI HORIZONTAL SIDING
7 SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS
8 ENTRY DOOR
9 FRENCH DOOR
10 MANDOOR
11 STYLIZED LIGHT AND ADDRESS
12 COMMERCIAL LIGHTING
13 STOREFRONT GLAZING
14 STOREFRONT DOOR
15 TRELLIS
16 BRICK/STONE VENEER

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
SCALE:

BLDG. A CONCEPTUAL BLDG. A REAR & LEFT EE
A1.1.2
1/8" = 1'-0"
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\9 Plex\EE\317068_9 Plex_SK_EE.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:56:20 AM, yanni 190 of 539

LEFT ELEVATION - A
BLDG 6 PLEX TYPICAL (BLDG. A SIM.) 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE ± 39'-6" MAX. PARAPET HEIGHT ±33'-10
3 4
" BUILDING HEIGHT

MID-POINT

OF ROOF

FRONT ELEVATION - A
BLDG 6 PLEX TYPICAL UNITS FACING CENTRAL OPEN SPACE AND PARK 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE ± 39'-6"
F F F F F F 2 5 3 4 7 6
8 1 9
16 REAR ELEVATION - A
BLDG 6 PLEX TYPICAL 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE ± 39'-6"

RIGHT ELEVATION - A
BLDG 6 PLEX TYPICAL 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE ± 39'-6" MAX. PARAPET HEIGHT ±33'-10
3 4
" BUILDING HEIGHT

MID-POINT

OF ROOF

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
SCALE:

BLDG. 6 PLEX TYP. CONCEPTUAL EE-A
A1.2.1
1/8" = 1'-0"
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\6 Plex\EE\317068_6 Plex EE Typ.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:56:31 AM, yanni 191 of 539

LEFT ELEVATION - B
BLDG 6 PLEX TYPICAL (BLDG. A SIM.) 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE ± 39'-6" MAX. PARAPET HEIGHT ±33'-10
3 4
" BUILDING HEIGHT

MID-POINT

OF ROOF

FRONT ELEVATION - B
BLDG 6 PLEX TYPICAL UNITS FACING CENTRAL OPEN SPACE AND PARK 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE ± 39'-6"
F F F F F F 2 5 3 4 7 6
8 1 9
NOTE: STONE AT PATIO DECKS
OMITTED AT INTERIOR PASEOS.

REAR ELEVATION - B
BLDG 6 PLEX TYPICAL 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE ± 39'-6"

RIGHT ELEVATION - B
BLDG 6 PLEX TYPICAL 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE ± 39'-6" MAX. PARAPET HEIGHT ±33'-10
3 4
" BUILDING HEIGHT

MID-POINT

OF ROOF

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
SCALE:

BLDG. 6 PLEX TYP. CONCEPTUAL EE-B
A1.2.2
1/8" = 1'-0"
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\6 Plex\EE\317068_6 Plex EE Typ B.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:56:43 AM, yanni 192 of 539
T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P.

T.H.

T.R.

FX4DNF049 (100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
26'-0"
14'-0" 12'-0" 50'-0" 7'-6" 41'-6" 50'-0" 7'-6" 42'-6"
26'-0" 50'-0" 7'-6" 42'-6"26'-0"
11'-8" 14'-4"
26'-0"
14'-0" 12'-0" 50'-0" 7'-6" 41'-6" 1'-0" 1'-0"

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 1
UPPER LIVING: 1021 SQ. FT.

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 1
MAIN LIVING: 1091 SQ. FT.TOTAL
TOTAL LIVING: 2183 SQ. FT.

DECK: 195 SQ. FT.

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 1 50'-0" 3'-0" 24'-5
1 2
" 22'-6
1 2
"
26'-0" 47'-0" 22'-6
1 2
" 24'-5
1 2
"
26'-0"
GROUND LIVING: 71 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 565 SQ. FT.
2880 3080
GAR.

ENT.

KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

PDR.

DEN BD. 4
M.BD.

BD. 2
BD. 3
BTH.2
M. BTH
LNDY.

W.I.C.

DECK
7'-0" 6'-0"
4'-8" 3'-712
" 1'-9" 1'-71
2 " 7'-1" 6'-0" 12'-9" 7'-3"
7'-0"
7'-0"
6'-0" 6'-0" 12'-4" 1'-3
1 2
" 6'-8
1 2
" 1'-3
1 2
" 5'-4
1 2
" 2'-3
1 2
" 12'-2
1 2
" 8'-3 7'-3" 1
2 " 3'-41
2 " 2'-3
1 2
" 6'-6
1 2
" 7'-3" 15'-6" 12'-3" 13'-9" 15'-6" 14'-4" 5'-5" 7'-3" 15'-6" 2'-10" 1'-0" 14'-9" 8'-8 1 2
"
2'-2
1 2
" 16'-3"
R.O.
2'-5
1 2
" 4'-3" 10"
UP17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" SCD
H.S. CPT H.S. CPT
CPT H.S.

H.S. CPT H.S. CPT H.S. CPT
COM 1
±585 SQ. FT.

A
A2.6
A
A2.6
A
A2.6
A
A2.6
A
A2.6
A
A2.6
7'-0" 6'-0"

TRASH TOTES, TYP
SCALE:

PLAN 1 & COMMERCIAL UNIT
A2.1
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Unit Plans\MH8\FP\317068_FP-MH8.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:56:52 AM, yanni 193 of 539

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 1 END

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 1 END

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 1 END
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
36'-0" 45'-6" 2'-0" 1'-0"
36'-0" 3'-0" 47'-0" T.P. T.R. T.H.
36'-0" 44'-0" 4'-6" 48'-6"
8'-0" 28'-0" T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P.

T.H.

FX4DNF049 T.R.
28'-0" 44'-0" 4'-6" 48'-6"
28'-0"
UPPER LIVING: 1074 SQ. FT. MAIN LIVING: 1144 SQ. FT.TOTAL TOTAL LIVING: 2289 SQ. FT.

DECK: 318 SQ. FT.

GROUND LIVING: 71 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 565 SQ. FT.

COM 1
±753 SQ. FT.

TRASH TOTES, TYP
SCALE:

PLAN 1-END & COMMERCIAL UNIT
A2.1.1
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Unit Plans\MH8\FP\317068_FP-MH8.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:56:53 AM, yanni 194 of 539

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5
DECK
16070 SECT. GAR. DR. SCD 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" ENT. 3080 FIBERGLASS 2468 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" GROUND LIVING: 275 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 496 SQ. FT.

W.I.C.
1 4"=1'-0" 3080 FRENCH DR
3050 SH SCD. 4"
+36" SCD.

PORCH: 30 SQ. FT.

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5 MAIN LIVING: 765 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 1765 SQ. FT.

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5 UPPER LIVING: 725 SQ. FT.

M.BD
BTH.2
BD. 2
M.BTH
LNDY
DIN
LIV.

PDR
GAR.

BD. 3
KIT.

FLEX. / BD.4/OFF. OPT.

PORCH
BTH.3 SCD.
3050 SH
2040 SH
2650 SH 2650 SH
3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH
2650 SH
4050 SL*
4050 SL*
6068 BI-PASS 2668 2668 6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
2468
3050 SH 3050 SH
+12" 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" 2668
2468 2868 2468
21068
21'-0"
11'-5" 9'-7"
5'-8 1'-10" 5'-9" 2'-0" 1
2 " 5'-8
1 2
" 39'-0"
21'-0" 39'-0" 3'-9
1 2
" 15'-0
1 2
" 6" 14'-8"
2'-4
1 2
" 16'-3" 2'-4
1 2
" 13'-2
1 2
" 3'-4" 13'-9
1 2
" 6" 8'-2" 2'-0"
11'-5" 10" 3'-7
1 2
" 1'-5
1 2
" 3'-8" 10'-10
1 2
" 2'-4"
2'-9
1 2
" 8'-2" 2'-4" 4'-1" 3'-7
1 2
"
21'-0" 38'-0" 12'-9
1 2
" 12'-10
1 2
" 10'-4" 5'-0" 36'-0" 2'-0" 34'-0" 3'-9
1 2
" 11'-4
1 2
" 3'-4" 7
1 2
" 5'-2" 3'-10" 5'-10
1 2
"
21'-0"
14'-4"
6'-8"
7'-2" 7'-2" 3'-4" 3'-4"
11'-01
2 " 9'-111
2 " 5'-61
4 5'-6 " 14
" 10'-9" 10'-3" 38'-0" 2'-0" 36'-0" 11'-10" 7'-1" 3'-4" 2'-4" 11'-5" 21'-0"
14'-4" 6'-8"
7'-2" 3'-5" 3'-4" 3'-4" 38'-0" 2'-0" 34'-0" 2'-0" 6'-5" 6'-1 1 2
" 3'-4" 1" 2'-4" 10'-0"
3'-6 3'-7" 1
2 8'-3 5'-7"
" 1
2 " 2'-8" 5'-7
1 2
" 3'-9
1 2
" 1'-7" 5'-7" 1'-7" 2'-7
1 2
" 3'-4"
1'-10" 3'-11"
6'-9" 1'-111
2 " 1'-101
2 " 2'-11
2 " 1'-0" 7'-41
2 "
10'-7" 3'-9" 5'-2
1 2
" 5'-10
1 2
" 1'-5
1 2
" DECK: 51 SQ. FT.

EVCS INSTALLED

REFUSE CARTS
OPT. TECH DESK
5'-2
3 4 5'-6 " 1
4 " 21'-0"
DN 30x24 CLR30x24 CLR
T.B. T.P.

T.P.

CPT. TILE CPT TILE
UP
DN
30x24 CLR
T.P.

CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT.

UP
T.P. 20'x20' GARAGE CLEARANCE BIKE STORAGE 30 CUBIC FEET @ EV FUTURE ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM (8'x1'-4")
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT
GARAGE CEILING) 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 2'-0"

TRASH TOTES, TYP
SCALE:

PLAN 5
A2.5.1
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Unit Plans\Pleasanton\FP\317068_FP-Pleasanton.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:56:58 AM, yanni 195 of 539

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5 - EXTENDED PORCH
DECK
16070 SECT. GAR. DR. SCD 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" ENT. 3080 FIBERGLASS 2468 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" GROUND LIVING: 275 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 496 SQ. FT.

W.I.C. 3080 FRENCH DR
3050 SH SCD. 4"
+36" SCD.

PORCH: 48 SQ. FT.

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5 - EXTENDED PORCH MAIN LIVING: 765 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 1765 SQ. FT.

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5 - EXTENDED PORCH UPPER LIVING: 725 SQ. FT.

M.BD
BTH.2
BD. 2
M.BTH
LNDY
DIN
LIV.

PDR
GAR.

BD. 3
KIT.

FLEX. / BD.4/OFF. OPT.

PORCH
BTH.3 SCD.
3050 SH
2040 SH
3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH
2650 SH
4050 SL*
4050 SL*
6068 BI-PASS 2668 2668 6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
2468
+12" 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" 2668
2468 2868 2468
21068
21'-0"
11'-5" 9'-7"
5'-8 1'-10" 5'-9" 2'-0" 1
2 " 5'-8
1 2
" 39'-0"
21'-0" 39'-0" 3'-9
1 2
" 15'-0
1 2
" 6" 14'-8"
2'-4
1 2
" 16'-3" 2'-4
1 2
" 13'-2
1 2
" 3'-4" 13'-9
1 2
" 6" 8'-2" 2'-0"
11'-5" 10" 7'-3" 1'-6" 10'-10
1 2
" 2'-4"
2'-9
1 2
" 8'-2" 2'-4" 4'-1" 3'-7
1 2
" 38'-0" 12'-9
1 2
" 12'-10
1 2
" 10'-4" 5'-0" 36'-0" 2'-0" 34'-0" 3'-9
1 2
" 11'-4
1 2
" 3'-4" 7
1 2
" 5'-2" 3'-10" 5'-10
1 2
"
21'-0"
14'-4"
6'-8"
7'-2" 7'-2" 3'-4" 3'-4" 38'-0" 2'-0" 36'-0" 11'-10" 7'-1" 3'-4" 2'-4" 11'-5" 21'-0"
14'-4" 6'-8"
7'-2" 3'-5" 3'-4" 3'-4" 38'-0" 2'-0" 34'-0" 2'-0" 6'-5" 6'-1 1 2
" 3'-4" 1" 2'-4" 10'-0"
3'-6 3'-7" 1
2 8'-3 5'-7"
" 1
2 " 2'-8" 5'-7
1 2
" 3'-9
1 2
" 1'-7" 5'-7" 1'-7" 2'-7
1 2
" 3'-4"
1'-10" 3'-11"
6'-9" 1'-111
2 " 1'-101
2 " 2'-11
2 " 1'-0" 7'-41
2 "
10'-7" 3'-9" 5'-2
1 2
" 5'-10
1 2
" 1'-5
1 2
" DECK: 51 SQ. FT.

EVCS INSTALLED

REFUSE CARTS
OPT. TECH DESK
1 4"=1'-0"3050 SH 3050 SH 2650 SH 2650 SH
21'-0" 21'-0"
11'-01
2 " 9'-111
2 " 5'-61
4 5'-6 " 14
" 10'-9" 10'-3"
5'-2
3 4 5'-6 " 1
4 "
DN 30x24 CLR30x24 CLR
T.B. T.P.

T.P.

CPT. TILE CPT TILE
UP
T.P. 20'x20' GARAGE CLEARANCE BIKE STORAGE 30 CUBIC FEET @ EV FUTURE ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM (8'x1'-4")
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
UP
DN
30x24 CLR
T.P.

CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. 5'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 2'-0"

TRASH TOTES, TYP
SCALE:

PLAN 5 - EXTENDED PORCH
A2.5.2
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Unit Plans\Pleasanton\FP\317068_FP-Pleasanton.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:56:59 AM, yanni 196 of 539

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5X - METER
16070 SECT. GAR. DR. SCD 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" ENT. 3080 FIBERGLASS 2468 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" GROUND LIVING: 277 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 500 SQ. FT.

W.I.C.
3050 SH SCD. 4"
+36" SCD.

PORCH: 30 SQ. FT.

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5X - METER MAIN LIVING: 785 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 1806 SQ. FT.

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5X - METER UPPER LIVING: 744 SQ. FT.

M.BD
BTH.2
BD. 2
M.BTH
LNDY
DIN
LIV.

PDR
GAR.

BD. 3
KIT.

FLEX. / BD.4/OFF. OPT.

PORCH
BTH.3 SCD.
3050 SH
2040 SH
3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH
2650 SH
4050 SL*
4050 SL*
6068 BI-PASS 2668 2668 6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
2468
+12" 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" 2668
2468 2868 2468
21068
21'-2"
11'-7" 9'-7"
5'-10 1'-10" 5'-9" 2'-0" 1
2 " 5'-8
1 2
" 39'-0"
21'-2" 39'-0" 3'-9
1 2
" 15'-0
1 2
" 6" 14'-8"
2'-6
1 2
" 16'-3" 2'-4
1 2
" 13'-2
1 2
" 3'-4" 13'-9
1 2
" 6" 8'-2" 2'-0"
11'-7" 10" 3'-7" 1'-6" 3'-8" 10'-10
1 2
" 2'-4"
2'-11
1 2
" 8'-2" 2'-4" 4'-1" 3'-7
1 2
" 2'-0" 38'-0" 12'-2" 13'-6" 10'-4" 5'-0" 36'-0" 2'-0" 34'-0" 3'-9 1 2
" 11'-4
1 2
" 3'-4" 7
1 2
" 5'-2" 3'-10"
21'-2"
14'-6" 6'-8"
7'-3" 7'-3" 3'-4" 3'-4" 2'-0" 38'-0" 6'-9" 3'-4" 2'-4"
0"
14'-6" 6'-8"
7'-4" 3'-5" 3'-4" 3'-4" 38'-0" 2'-0" 34'-0" 21'-10" 6'-5" 6'-1 1 2
" 3'-4" 1" 2'-4" 10'-0"
3'-6 3'-7" 1
2 " 3'-9
1 2
" 1'-7" 5'-7" 1'-7" 2'-7
1 2
" 3'-4"
1'-10" 3'-11"
6'-11" 1'-111
2 " 1'-101
2 " 2'-11
2 " 1'-0" 7'-41
2 "
10'-9" 3'-9" 5'-2
1 2
" 5'-10
1 2
" 1'-5
1 2
" 12'-2" 13'-6" 10'-4" 11'-10" 4" 12'-6" 1'-0" 6'-1" 6'-1" 6'-9" 5'-9" 2'-6" 6'-0 1 2
" 2'-4" 7'-4
1 2
" 6'-5" 3'-2" 5'-0" 2'-0" 7'-10" 2'-0" 3'-5
1 2
" 3'-3
1 2
" 1'-6" 1'-10" 2'-0" 6'-4" 2'-0"
DECK: 51 SQ. FT.

EVCS INSTALLED

REFUSE CARTS
OPT. TECH DESK
DECK 3080 FRENCH DR1
4"=1'-0"3050 SH 3050 SH 2650 SH 2650 SH
21'-2" 21'-2"
11'-21
2 " 9'-111
2 " 5'-61
4 5'-8 " 14
" 10'-11" 10'-3"
5'-2
3 4 5'-8 " 1
4 " UP
T.P. 20'x20' GARAGE CLEARANCE BIKE STORAGE 30 CUBIC FEET @ EV FUTURE ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM (8'x1'-4")
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
UP
DN
30x24 CLR
T.P.

CPT. TILE TILE CPT.

T.P. 30x24 CLR CPT TILE
DN
30x24 CLR
T.B. T.P.

CPT. TILE CPT 5'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0"

TRASH TOTES, TYP
SCALE:

PLAN 5X - METER
A2.5.3
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Unit Plans\Pleasanton\FP\317068_FP-Pleasanton.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:57:00 AM, yanni 197 of 539

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5X - EXTENDED PORCH
16070 SECT. GAR. DR. SCD 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" ENT. 3080 FIBERGLASS 2468 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" GROUND LIVING: 277 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 500 SQ. FT.

W.I.C.
3050 SH SCD. 4"
+36" SCD.

PORCH: 48 SQ. FT.

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5X - EXTENDED PORCH MAIN LIVING: 785 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 1806 SQ. FT.

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 5X - EXTENDED PORCH UPPER LIVING: 744 SQ. FT.

M.BD
BTH.2
BD. 2
M.BTH
LNDY
DIN
LIV.

PDR
GAR.

BD. 3
KIT.

FLEX. / BD.4/OFF. OPT.

PORCH
BTH.3 SCD.
3050 SH
2040 SH
3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH
2650 SH
4050 SL*
4050 SL*
6068 BI-PASS 2668 2668 6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
2468
+12" 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" 17 RISERS @ 7.27" 16 TREADS @ 10" 2668
2468 2868 2468
21068
21'-2"
11'-7" 9'-7"
5'-10 1'-10" 5'-9" 2'-0" 1
2 " 5'-8
1 2
" 39'-0"
21'-2" 39'-0" 5'-0" 3'-9
1 2
" 15'-0
1 2
" 6" 14'-8"
2'-6
1 2
" 16'-3" 2'-4
1 2
" 13'-2
1 2
" 3'-4" 13'-9
1 2
" 6" 8'-2" 2'-0"
11'-7" 10" 7'-3" 1'-6" 10'-10
1 2
" 2'-4"
2'-11
1 2
" 8'-2" 2'-4" 4'-1" 3'-7
1 2
" 2'-0" 38'-0" 12'-2" 13'-6" 10'-4" 5'-0" 36'-0" 2'-0" 34'-0" 3'-9 1 2
" 11'-4
1 2
" 3'-4" 7
1 2
" 5'-2" 3'-10" 5'-10
1 2
"
21'-2"
14'-6" 6'-8"
7'-3" 7'-3" 3'-4" 3'-4" 2'-0" 38'-0" 6'-9" 3'-4" 2'-4"
21'-2"
14'-6" 6'-8"
7'-4" 3'-5" 3'-4" 3'-4" 38'-0" 2'-0" 34'-0" 2'-0" 6'-5" 6'-1 1 2
" 3'-4" 1" 2'-4" 10'-0"
3'-6 3'-7" 1
2 " 3'-9
1 2
" 1'-7" 5'-7" 1'-7" 2'-7
1 2
" 3'-4"
1'-10" 3'-11"
6'-11" 1'-111
2 " 1'-101
2 " 2'-11
2 " 1'-0" 7'-41
2 "
10'-9" 3'-9" 5'-2
1 2
" 5'-10
1 2
" 1'-5
1 2
" 12'-2" 13'-6" 10'-4" 11'-10" 4" 12'-6" 1'-0" 6'-1" 6'-1" 6'-9" 5'-9" 2'-6" 6'-0 1 2
" 2'-4" 7'-4
1 2
" 6'-5" 3'-2" 5'-0" 2'-0" 7'-10" 2'-0" 3'-5
1 2
" 3'-3
1 2
" 1'-6" 1'-10" 2'-0" 6'-4" 2'-0"
DECK: 51 SQ. FT.

EVCS INSTALLED

REFUSE CARTS
OPT. TECH DESK
DECK 3080 FRENCH DR1
4"=1'-0"3050 SH 3050 SH 2650 SH 2650 SH
21'-2" 21'-2"
11'-21
2 " 9'-111
2 " 5'-61
4 5'-8 " 14
" 10'-11" 10'-3"
5'-2
3 4 5'-8 " 1
4 " UP
DN
30x24 CLR
T.P.

CPT. TILE TILE CPT.

T.P. 30x24 CLR CPT TILE
DN
30x24 CLR
T.B. T.P.

CPT. TILE CPT
UP
T.P. 20'x20' GARAGE CLEARANCE BIKE STORAGE 30 CUBIC FEET @ EV FUTURE ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM (8'x1'-4")
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT
GARAGE CEILING) 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0"

TRASH TOTES, TYP
SCALE:

PLAN 5X- EXTENDED PORCH
A2.5.4
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Unit Plans\Pleasanton\FP\317068_FP-Pleasanton.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:57:01 AM, yanni 198 of 539
ENT.

BD. 2
PDR.DEN
M.CLS.

PORCH
ATTIC
M.BD.

LIV. CLS.

COMM. 9'-1" 9'-1" 12'-1"

CONCEPTUAL SECTION A-A
PLAN 1 & COMMERCIAL 40'-0" OVERALL HT.

UP 20'x20' GARAGE CLEARANCE 3080 2868 3068
3080
5046 SL 2668
3046 FX
2070 FX T.P.

FLOOR PLAN - ADU OPT.

PLAN 5 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
ADU LIVING: 314 SQ. FT.

ACCESS DOOR

GAR ENT
KIT.

HALL 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
BTH. 3
PORCH FOR HEEL HT. SEE RP 8" HEEL 40'-0" OVERALL HEIGHT M.BD.

LIV.

BTH.2
ADJ. UNIT GAR
DECK 3'-6"
3'-6" 7'-6
1 2
" 7'-2
34" MIN.
13'-8" 1'-0" 3'-6" 42" MIN.

SEE RP 12'-6"
FRONT ROOF 2'-6"
11'-0"

REAR ROOF
21" 2'-6" 2'-8" 8'-2
1 2
" 2'-1" 2'-6"
ATTIC 2'-0" 1'-0"

CONCEPTUAL SECTION B-B
PLAN 1 & COMMERCIAL

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
SCALE:

PLAN 5 ADU FLOOR PLAN & CONCEPTUAL UNIT SECTIONS
A2.6
1/8" = 1'-0"
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Sections\317068_Unit Sections.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:57:09 AM, yanni 199 of 539

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. A
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
255'-4"
10'-0" 235'-4" 10'-0" 47'-0" 24'-5
1 2
" 2" 20'-10
1 2
" 1'-6"
COMM. COMM. COMM. COMM. COMM. COMM. COMM. COMM. COMM.

PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 TRASH
ROOM
SCALE:

BLDG A GFP_9 PLEX MIXED (1 BLDG)
A3.1.1
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\9 Plex\FP\317068_9 Plex_SK_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:58:52 AM, yanni 200 of 539

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. A T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. 255'-4"
2'-0" 235'-4" 2'-0"
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 8'-0" 8'-0" 50'-0" 1'-0" 26'-0" 17'-0" 4'-6" 1'-6" 7'-6" SCALE:

BLDG A MFP_9 PLEX MIXED (1 BLDG)
A3.1.2
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\9 Plex\FP\317068_9 Plex_SK_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:58:53 AM, yanni 201 of 539

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. A T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.H.

FX4DNF049 T.R. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.H. T.R.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.H. T.R.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.R. T.H.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.H. T.R. T.P. T.R. T.H.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.H. T.R. T.P. T.R. T.H.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.H. T.R. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.H. T.R.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.H. T.R.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.H.FX4DNF049 T.R. 239'-4"
2'-0" 235'-4" 2'-0"
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 50'-0" 1'-0" 26'-0" 17'-0" 4'-6" 1'-6" SCALE:

BLDG A UFP_9 PLEX MIXED (1 BLDG)
A3.1.3
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\9 Plex\FP\317068_9 Plex_SK_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:58:54 AM, yanni 202 of 539
8:12 8:12RIDGE

VALLEY VALLEY
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
8:12 8:12 8:12RIDGE

VALLEY VALLEY
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
8:12 8:12
8:12 8:12 8:12 8:12
VALLEY 8:12 8:12 RIDGE

VALLEY VALLEY
4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
3/8:12
VALLEY RIDGE 8:12 8:12
VALLEY VALLEY RIDGE 8:12 8:12
VALLEY VALLEY RIDGE 8:12 8:12 RIDGE
VALLEY VALLEY 8:12 8:12
VALLEY RIDGE VALLEY 8:12 8:12

VALLEY VALLEY RIDGE

ROOF PLAN
BLDG. A
SCALE:

BLDG A RP_9 PLEX MIXED (1 BLDG)
A3.1.4
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\9 Plex\FP\317068_9 Plex_SK_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:58:55 AM, yanni 203 of 539

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. B
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
(100 CUBIC FT. OF

STORAGE AT

GARAGE CEILING)
203'-0"
183'-0" 2'-10" 7'-2" 47'-0" 24'-5
1 2
" 20'-10
1 2
" 1'-6"
COMM. COMM. COMM. COMM. COMM. COMM. COMM.

PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
10'-0"
TRASH
ROOM
SCALE:

BLDG B GFP_7 PLEX MIXED (1 BLDG)
A3.2.1
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\7 Plex\FP\317068_7 Plex_SK_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:03 AM, yanni 204 of 539

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. B T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.R. T.H. 203'-0"
2'-0" 183'-0" 2'-0"
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
8'-0" 8'-0"
SCALE:

BLDG B MFP_7 PLEX MIXED (1 BLDG)
A3.2.2
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\7 Plex\FP\317068_7 Plex_SK_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:04 AM, yanni 205 of 539

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. B T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.H.

FX4DNF049 T.R. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.H. T.R.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.R. T.H.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.H. T.R. T.P. T.R. T.H.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.H. T.R. T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.H. T.R.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.H. T.R.FX4DNF049 T.P. T.R. T.H. T.P. T.H.FX4DNF049 T.R. 187'-0"
2'-0" 183'-0" 2'-0"
PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1 PLAN 1
SCALE:

BLDG B UFP_7 PLEX MIXED (1 BLDG)
A3.2.3
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\7 Plex\FP\317068_7 Plex_SK_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:05 AM, yanni 206 of 539
63'-4" 39'-0"
63'-4" 39'-0"
2'-10"
T.P. UPT.P. UP T.P. UP
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE

FOR LV PULL MAIN METER

STACKGROUND FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. C (BLDG. S, T, CC SIM.)
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. C (BLDG. S, T, CC SIM.)
30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR T.P. UP DN
TILE CPT. TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 63'-4" 39'-0"
63'-4" 41'-0"
SCALE:

BLDG C GFP-MFP_3 PLEX (4 BLDGS_C-S-T-CC)
A3.3.1
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\3 Plex\FP\317068_3 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:11 AM, yanni 207 of 539

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. C (BLDG. S, T, CC SIM.)
DN 30x24 CLR
30x24 CLR +36" SHELF +12" SHELF
T.B. T.P.

T.P. CPT. TILE CPT TILE 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 4050 SL* 4050 SL* 6068 BI-PASS
2668
2668
6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
(2) 3050 SH* 2468 DN 30x24 CLR
30x24 CLR+36" SHELF +12" SHELF
T.B. T.P. T.P. TILE CPT. CPT TILE 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 4050 SL* 4050 SL* 6068 BI-PASS 2668
2668 6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
(2) 3050 SH* 2468
63'-4" 41'-0"
63'-4" 41'-0"
SCALE:

BLDG C UFP_3 PLEX (4 BLDGS_C-S-T-CC)
A3.3.2
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\3 Plex\FP\317068_3 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:12 AM, yanni 208 of 539

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. D (BLDG. F TO M & AA SIM.)
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
T.P. UPT.P. UPT.P. UPT.P. UPT.P. UP T.P. UP
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE

FOR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK PLAN 5 PLAN 5
126'-10" 39'-0"
126'-10" 39'-0"
2'-10"
SCALE:

BLDG D GFP_6 PLEX (11 BLDGS)
A3.4.1
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\6 Plex\FP\317068_6 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:19 AM, yanni 209 of 539

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. D (BLDG. F TO M & AA SIM.)
T.P. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFOT.P. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFOT.P. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFOT.P. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFOT.P. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFOT.P. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 126'-10" 39'-0"
126'-10" 39'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0"
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
SCALE:

BLDG D MFP_6 PLEX (11 BLDGS)
A3.4.2
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\6 Plex\FP\317068_6 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:20 AM, yanni 210 of 539

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. D (BLDG. F TO M & AA SIM.)
T.B. T.P.

T.P. T.B. T.P.T.P. T.B. T.P.T.P. T.B. T.P.T.P. T.B. T.P.T.P. T.B. T.P. T.P. 126'-10" 39'-0" 126'-10" 39'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0"
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
SCALE:

BLDG D UFP_6 PLEX (11 BLDGS)
A3.4.3
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\6 Plex\FP\317068_6 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:21 AM, yanni 211 of 539

ROOF PLAN
BLDG. D (BLDG. F TO M & AA SIM.)
VALLEY RIDGE 8:12 8:12
VALLEY VALLEY RIDGE 8:12 8:12VALLEY VALLEY RIDGE 8:12 8:12VALLEYRIDGE 8:12 VALLEY RIDGE8:12
VALLEY VALLEY RIDGE8:12 8:12VALLEY VALLEY RIDGE8:12 8:12VALLEY RIDGE8:12 3/8:12
8:12
8:12 8:12 8:12 8:12
3/8:12
SCALE:

BLDG D RP_6 PLEX (11 BLDGS)
A3.4.4
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\6 Plex\FP\317068_6 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:22 AM, yanni 212 of 539
126'-10" 39'-0" 17'-10" 39'-0"
2'-10"
T.P. UPT.P. UP T.P. UP
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE

FOR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. UP
T.P. UP T.P. UP GROUND FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. E
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 17'-10" PLAN 5
63'-6" 63'-4"
63'-4" 63'-6" 56'-10"
SCALE:

BLDG E GFP_6 PLEX OFFSET (1 BLDG)
A3.5.1
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\6 Plex\FP\317068_6 Plex Offset_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:28 AM, yanni 213 of 539

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. E
30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR T.P. UP DN
TILE CPT. TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR T.P. UP DN
TILE CPT. TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 17 RISERS @ 7.28" PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
126'-10" 41'-0" 17'-10" 41'-0" 17'-10"
63'-6" 63'-4"
63'-4" 63'-6" 58'-10"
SCALE:

BLDG E MFP_6 PLEX OFFSET (1 BLDG)
A3.5.2
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\6 Plex\FP\317068_6 Plex Offset_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:29 AM, yanni 214 of 539

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. E
DN 30x24 CLR
30x24 CLR +36" SHELF +12" SHELF
T.B. T.P.

T.P. CPT. TILE CPT TILE 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 4050 SL* 4050 SL* 6068 BI-PASS
2668
2668
6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
(2) 3050 SH* 2468 DN 30x24 CLR
30x24 CLR+36" SHELF +12" SHELF
T.B. T.P. T.P. TILE CPT. CPT TILE 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 4050 SL* 4050 SL* 6068 BI-PASS 2668 2668
6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
(2) 3050 SH* 2468 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
126'-10" 41'-0" 17'-10" 41'-0" 17'-10"
63'-6" 63'-4"
63'-4" 63'-6" 58'-10"
SCALE:

BLDG E UFP_6 PLEX OFFSET (1 BLDG)
A3.5.3
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\6 Plex\FP\317068_6 Plex Offset_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:30 AM, yanni 215 of 539
81'-7" 39'-0"
81'-7" 39'-0"
2'-10"
T.P. UPT.P. UP
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE

FOR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. UP

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. N
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. N
30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP DN

SEE BUILDING PLANS

FOR STAIR INFO
17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5"
30x24 CLR
T.P. 81'-7" 39'-0"
81'-7" 41'-0
1 4
"
SCALE:

BLDG N GFP-MFP_3 PLEX ROTATED (1 BLDG)
A3.6.1
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\3 Plex\FP\317068_3 Plex Rotated_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:37 AM, yanni 216 of 539

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. N
DN 30x24 CLR
30x24 CLR +36" SHELF +12" SHELF
T.B. T.P.

T.P. CPT. TILE CPT TILE 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 4050 SL* 4050 SL* 6068 BI-PASS
2668
2668
6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
(2) 3050 SH* 2468 DN
30x24 CLR30x24 CLR +36" SHELF +12" SHELF T.B. T.P. T.P. 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 6068 BI-PASS 2668
2668 6068 BI-PASS 2468
2468 21080
2668 OPT. 2668
2468 (2) 3050 SH* 2468
81'-7" 39'-0"
81'-7" 41'-0"
SCALE:

BLDG N UFP_3 PLEX ROTATED (1 BLDG)
A3.6.2
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\3 Plex\FP\317068_3 Plex Rotated_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:37 AM, yanni 217 of 539
T.P. UP
T.P. UPT.P. UPT.P. UPT.P. UP T.P. UP
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE

FOR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. UP
T.P. UP GROUND FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. U
169'-2" 39'-0"
169'-2" 39'-0"
2'-10"
SCALE:

BLDG U GFP_8 PLEX (1 BLDG)
A3.7.1
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\8 Plex\FP\317068_8 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:44 AM, yanni 218 of 539
30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
TILE CPT. TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP DN
CPT. TILE TILE CPT. CPT. TILE TILE CPT. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR STAIR INFO 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5"

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. U
SCALE:

BLDG U MFP_8 PLEX (1 BLDG)
A3.7.2
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\8 Plex\FP\317068_8 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:45 AM, yanni 219 of 539

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. U
DN 30x24 CLR30x24 CLR +36" SHELF +12" SHELF
T.B. T.P.

T.P. CPT. TILE CPT TILE 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 4050 SL* 4050 SL* 6068 BI-PASS
2668
2668
6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
(2) 3050 SH* 2468 DN 30x24 CLR
30x24 CLR+36" SHELF +12" SHELF
T.B. T.P. T.P. TILE CPT. CPT TILE 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 4050 SL* 4050 SL* 6068 BI-PASS 2668
2668
6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
(2) 3050 SH* 2468 DN 30x24 CLR
30x24 CLR +36" SHELF +12" SHELF
T.B. T.P.

T.P. CPT. TILE CPT TILE 17 RISERS @ 7.28" 16 TREADS @ 10.5" 4050 SL* 4050 SL* 6068 BI-PASS
2668
2668
6068 BI-PASS
2468 2468
21080 2668 OPT.
2668
2468
(2) 3050 SH* 2468 SCALE:

BLDG U UFP_8 PLEX (1 BLDG)
A3.7.3
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\8 Plex\FP\317068_8 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:47 AM, yanni 220 of 539

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. V (BLDG. BB SIM.)
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
84'-6" 39'-0"
84'-6" 39'-0"
2'-10"
T.P. UPT.P. UPT.P. UP T.P. UP
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE

FOR LV PULL MAIN METER

STACK MAIN FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. V (BLDG. BB SIM.)
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. 84'-6" 39'-0"
84'-6" 39'-0"
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
SCALE:

BLDG V GFP-MFP_4 PLEX (2 BLDGS_V & BB)
A3.8.1
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\4 Plex\FP\317068_4 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:53 AM, yanni 221 of 539

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. V (BLDG. BB SIM.)
T.B. T.P.

T.P. T.B. T.P.T.P. T.B. T.P.T.P. T.B. T.P. T.P. 84'-6" 39'-0" 84'-6" 39'-0"
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
SCALE:

BLDG V UFP_4 PLEX (2 BLDGS_V & BB)
A3.8.2
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\4 Plex\FP\317068_4 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 10:59:54 AM, yanni 222 of 539
105'-8" 39'-0"
105'-8" 39'-0"
2'-10"
T.P. UPT.P. UPT.P. UPT.P. UP
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE

FOR LV PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. UP GROUND FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. W (BLDG. X, Y SIM.)
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
SCALE:

BLDG W GFP_5 PLEX (3 BLDGS_W-X-Y)
A3.9.1
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\5 Plex\FP\317068_5 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 11:00:00 AM, yanni 223 of 539

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. W (BLDG. X, Y SIM.)
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. 105'-8" 41'-0"
105'-8" 41'-0"
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
SCALE:

BLDG W MFP_5 PLEX (3 BLDGS_W-X-Y)
A3.9.2
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\5 Plex\FP\317068_5 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 11:00:01 AM, yanni 224 of 539

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
BLDG. W (BLDG. X, Y SIM.)
T.B. T.P.

T.P. T.B. T.P.T.P. T.B. T.P.T.P. T.B. T.P.T.P. T.B. T.P. T.P. 105'-8" 41'-0" 105'-8" 41'-0"
PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5 PLAN 5
SCALE:

BLDG W UFP_5 PLEX (3 BLDGS_W-X-Y)
A3.9.3
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\5 Plex\FP\317068_5 Plex_STD_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 11:00:02 AM, yanni 225 of 539
POOL/COMMUNITY BLDG.

TERRACE
POOL EQUIP. BATH

LOBBY VAULTED CEILING
8:12
MENS
BATH
30'-0"
3060 SH 22'-0" 4050 SH 4050 SH 12'-0" 2'-6" 7'-0" 2'-6" 9'-6" 9'-0" 19'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 3080
2070 FX 2070 FX
2070 FX 30802070 FX PR 3080 FR DR PR 3080 FR DR PR 3080 FR DR PR 3080 FR DR
4050 SH 9'-6" 9'-6" 10'-6" 8'-0"
10'-0"
9'-6"
37'-6"
2'-6" 7'-0" 2'-0" 7'-0" 2'-0" 7'-0" 2'-6" 4'-0
1 2
" 1'-5
1 2
" 1'-11
1 2
" 3080 3080
30801'-10"
WOMENS
BATH

COMMUNITY
ROOM 34'-0"
77'-6" 3'-6" 10'-0" 22'-0" 2'-0" 3060 SH 3060 SH STORAGE 9'-0
1 2 18'-11 " 12
" 10'-0" 3'-2" 6'-10"
10'-0"
77'-6"
T F F 10'-1" 12'-1"
POOL/COMMUNITY BLDG. FRONT.

SCALE:

COMMUNITY BLDG. FP & FRONT ELEV.

A4.1
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\Pool Bldg\FP\317068_Pool Bldg_FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 11:00:07 AM, yanni 226 of 539

FRONT ELEVATION

TRASH ENCLOSURE SLAB PLAN
BLDG. AREA: 360 SQ. FT. 16'-0"

TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS
TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN 16'-0"
22'-6"

TRASH ENCLOSURE ROOF PLAN
2% SLOPE MAX.
3" TALL CURB STOP
REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION 9'-8"
GROUND S.O.G. ±15'-0" MAX.TOP OF CMU WALL 9'-8"GROUND S.O.G. ±13'-0"

TOP OF CMU WALL
COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF TYP.

METAL MESH SCREEN

VENTILATION
5FT. DIAM RADIUS
FLOOR DRAIN.
9" RAKE 1'-2" EAVE

GSM GUTTER

GSM GUTTER
22'-6"
LINE OF 6" CMU WALL

COMPOST LANDFILL LANDFILL

RECYCLE RECYCLE

GROUND BOLT SYSTEM AT

ONE DOOR

SINGLE WOOD BARN DOORS
BARN LIGHT TYP.

LATCHING SYSTEM

STUCCO FINISH
4:12
4:12

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
SCALE:

CONCEPTUAL TRASH ENCLOSURE
A4.2
1/4" = 1'-0"
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\Trash Enclosure\317068_Trash Enclosure.dwg, 11/14/2024 11:00:13 AM, yanni 227 of 539
3 BED
3 BED
2 BED
2 BED
2 BED
2 BED
3 BED
COMM. RM.
1 BED
1 BED
1 BED
1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED
MECH.

LNDY.

STO. BATH

STORAGE UNDER

STAIR SITE PLAN
0 5
10 15
20 25
50 NORTH 11'-0" 102'-0" 8'-10"

BIKE LANE

SIDEWALK

PARKING ENTRY
57 TOTAL SPACES 4'-0" PARKING ENTRY 8'-0"
11'-0" 158'-0" NO PARKING VAN
TRASH

ENCLOSURE
SCALE:

CONCEPTUAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING SITE
A5.1
1:20

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\Affordable Housing\317068_Cotati_4-story Site.dwg, 11/14/2024 11:01:46 AM, yanni 228 of 539

BUILDING PLAN
158'-0"
34'-0" 36'-0" 14'-0" 36'-0" 38'-0" 102'-0" 30'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 30'-0" 102'-0" 27'-0" 12'-0" 32'-0" 31'-0" 158'-0"
34'-0" 22'-0" 22'-0" 22'-0" 22'-0" 36'-0"
3 BED
3 BED
2 BED
2 BED
2 BED
2 BED
3 BED
COMM. RM.
1 BED
1 BED
1 BED
1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED
MECH.

LNDY.

STO. BATH

STORAGE UNDER
STAIR
SCALE:

CONCEPTUAL AFFORDABLE BUILDING FP
A5.2
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\Affordable Housing\FP\317068_Cotati_4-story FP.dwg, 11/14/2024 11:01:52 AM, yanni 229 of 539

FRONT ELEVATION
AFFORDABLE BUILDING 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE ± 39'-6"
Cotati Housing

LEFT ELEVATION
AFFORDABLE BUILDING 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
GROUND S.O.G.

GROUND PLATE
MAIN SUBFLR.

MAIN PLATE
UPPER SUBFLR.

UPPER PLATE ± 39'-6" MAX. PARAPET HEIGHT
Cotati Housing

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

CALIFORNIA

11.14.2024
317068.00
SCALE:

CONCEPTUAL AFFORDABLE BUILDING EE
A5.3
1/8" = 1'-0"
z:\317068_cotati\Dwgs\DR-SD\Dwgs\Bldg\Affordable Housing\EE\317068_Afford Bldg EE.dwg, 11/14/2024 11:02:04 AM, yanni 230 of 539
REDWOOD DRIVE GRAVENSTEIN HIGHWAY EX. PROPERTY LINE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE PUE R=35.0' EX. RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED ROW EX. LOT LINE PROPOSED LOT LINE EX. LOT LINE (TO BE REMOVED WITH FINAL MAP) EX. LOT LINE (TO BE REMOVED WITH FINAL MAP) 347.66'
119.00'
EX. ACCESS ESMT
(DOC # 2004-154403) R=40.0' LOT 1 (9.67 ACRES) APN: 046-286-019 & 046-286-020 LOT 2 (0.95 ACRES) APN: 046-286-018 & 046-286-017 36.0' PAE, PUE 26.0' PUE, EVA

26.0'

PUE, EVA

26.0' PUE, EVA

26.0'

PUE, EVA
PUE, EVA 26.0' PAE, PUE

25.0' ROW
DEDICATION 20.0' PUE, EVA

26.0' PUE, EVA

PUE, EVA

26.0'

14.8' PAE

28.0' PRIVATE UTILITY ESMT

8.0' PUE
EX. 10' LOWE'S

ENCROACHMENT
EX. 15.0' SEWER ESMT
(DOC 2003-52342) EX. ACCESS ESMT (DOC 2004-154402)
EX. ACCESS ESMT
(DOC 2004-154402)

25.0' ROW

DEDICATION
EX. STORM

DRAIN ESMT
(DOC 88-058595 & 1992-0017108)

33.5'

PAE, PUE

26.0'

PUE, EVA

26.0' PUE, EVA

26.0' PUE, EVA
EX. 80' ROW
27'

BUILDING
SETBACK EX. LOWE'S BUILDING 15.0' PUE

26.0' PUE Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 50 ft. 50 100 50 C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: VESTING TENTATIVE MAP1:50 EXISTING BOUNDARY LINE APN ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER ESMT EASEMENT EVA EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EX. EXISTING PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PAE PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT ROW RIGHT OF WAY ABBREVIATIONS DESCRIPTION AREA (AC) TOTAL LOT 1 AREA 9.67 TOTAL LOT 2 AREA 0.95 PUE, PAE, & EVA 3.37 PROJECT SUMMARY ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS: 046-286-017, 046-286-018, 046-286-019, 046-286-020 SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY: CITY OF COTATI SOURCE OF SANITARY DISPOSAL: CITY OF COTATI EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: VACANT PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: 2 LOT SUBDIVISION LOT 1 - 134 UNITS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES AND THEIR WITH ASSOCIATED ADU'S. LOT 2 - FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PURPOSES EXISTING ZONING: (CG) - COMMERCIAL - GRAVENSTEIN CORRIDOR PROPSED ZONING: (CG) - COMMERCIAL - GRAVENSTEIN CORRIDOR GENERAL PLAN: GC - GENERAL COMMERCIAL OWNER: COTATI COMMONS MARKETPLACE, LLC. APPLICANT: CITY VENTURES PROJECT ADDRESS: NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF GRAVENSTEIN HIGHWAY AND REDWOOD DRIVE IN THE CITY OF COTATI, COUNTY OF SONOMA, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 134 CONDOMINIUMS (DOES NOT INCLUDE AFFORDABLE HOMES ON LOT 2) COMMERCIAL UNITS: 16 PROJECTED SEWAGE GENERATION: 150 UNITS x 300 GPD (ESTIMATED WASTE OF EACH UNIT) = 45,000 GPD SOIL CONDITIONS: SOIL TYPE C CONSISTS PREDOMINANTLY OF SOILS WITH A HIGH CLAY CONTENT, INCLUDING CLAY LOAMS AND SOME SHALLOW SANDY LOAMS. FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE: NO PHASING: PER GOV. CODE SECTION 66456.1, THE SUBDIVIDER INTENDS TO FILE AND RESERVES THE RIGHT TO FILE MULTIPLE FNAL MAPS. 1 101

W COTATI AVE GRAVENSTEIN HWY

ALDER AVE

HELMAN LN

REDWOOD DRSOUTHWEST BLVD WILFORD LN OLD REDWOOD HWY
ST. JOSEPH WAY 116
COMMERCE BLVD PROJECT SITE SCALE: NTS LOCATION MAP EXISTING OFFSITE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING INTERIOR LOT LINE EXISTING EASEMENT AS NOTED PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY LINE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS ADDITIONAL PROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS LEGEND EXISTING PUBLIC ACCESS - A NEW PAE WILL BE GRANTED TO ALLOW PUBLIC ACCESS IN THIS AREA DEVELOPER SUBDIVIDER CIVIL ENGINEER/SURVEYOR CITY VENTURES CITY VENTURES CSW|ST2 ENGINEERING GROUP (CSW|ST2) 444 SPEAR STREET, SUITE 200 444 SPEAR STREET, SUITE 200 5870 STONERIDGE MALL RD., SUITE 310 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 PLEASANTON, CA 94588 CONTACT: WILLIE PYLE CONTACT: WILLIE PYLE CONTACT: MICHAEL VIDRA PHONE: 562-370-8371 PHONE: 562-370-8371 PHONE: 925-7887-4982 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL ONE: PARCEL "B" OF EXHIBIT B ATTACHED TO THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PURPOSES RECORDED JUNE 1, 2004 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2004-083407 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SONOMA. PARCEL ONE-A: A NON-EXCLUSIVE VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT DESCRIBED AS PARCELS "C" AND "D" IN A DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ENTRY ROADWAY EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT" RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 2004 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2004-154402, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SONOMA COUNTY. PARCEL ONE-B: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR ACCESS TO AND THE USE OF THE PARK AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS OVER THAT PORTION OF LAND DESIGNATED AS THE GREENBELT PARK EASEMENT AND DESCRIBED AS PARCELS "A" AND "B" OF EXHIBIT B IN A DOCUMENT ENTITLED "COTATI MARKET PLACE, GREENBELT PARK EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT" AND RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2004-154403,OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SONOMA COUNTY. PARCEL TWO: PARCEL "C" OF EXHIBIT B ATTACHED TO THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PURPOSES RECORDED JUNE 1, 2004 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2004-083407 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SONOMA. 231 of 539 C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: COLORED MAP EXHIBITNTS 2 PROJECT SITE COLORED PARCEL IDENTIFICATION MAP OFFSITE COLORED EASEMENT IDENTIFICATION MAP PROJECT SITE COLORED EASEMENT IDENTIFICATION MAP232 of 539 Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 50 ft. 50 50 100
REDWOOD DRIVE GRAVENSTEIN HWY EX. PROPERTY LINE EX. LOWE'S EDGE OF PAVEMENT EX. PROPERTY LINE EX. HERITAGE TREE (TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE) EX. SHRUB (TO BE REMOVED) EX. TREES (TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE) EX. FENCE (TO BE REMOVED) EX. STOCKPILE (TO BE REMOVED AND REGRADED ON-SITE) EX. ACCESS ESMT (DOC # 2004-154403) R=35.0' EX. LOT LINE (TO BE REMOVED WITH FINAL MAP) EX. LOT LINE (TO BE REMOVED WITH FINAL MAP) EX. 10' LOWE'S

ENCROACHMENT
EX. 15.0' SEWER ESMT
(DOC 2003-52342) EX. ACCESS ESMT (DOC 2004-154402)
EX. ACCESS ESMT
(DOC 2004-154402)
EX. STORM

DRAIN ESMT
(DOC 88-058595 & 1992-0017108) EX. RIGHT OF WAY
EX. 80' ROW APN: 046-286-019 (TO BE MERGED IN FINAL MAP WITH 046-286-020) APN: 046-286-020 (TO BE MERGED IN FINAL MAP WITH 046-286-019) APN: 046-286-017 (TO BE MERGED IN FINAL MAP WITH 046-286-018) APN: 046-286-018 (TO BE MERGED IN FINAL MAP WITH 046-286-017) EX. LOT LINE (TO BE ADJUSTED WITH FINAL MAP) EX. DETENTION POND EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. FIRE HYDRANT (PROTECT IN PLACE) EX. LOWE'S 55' TURNING RADIUS EX. STOCKPILE TOP OF BANK EX. STOCKPILE TOE OF BANK EX. HIGH VOLTAGE PG&E VAULT (PROTECT IN PLACE) EX. JOINT TRENCH (SEE NOTE 3) EX. GAS AND ELECTRIC
EX. WATER
EX. SANITARY SEWER
EX. WATER
EX. WATER
EX. SANITARY SEWER
EX. STORM DRAIN C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: EXISTING CONDITIONS1:50 1. DISTANCES SHOWN ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 2. THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS MAP IS THE CALCULATED BEARING OF NORTH 73 49'32" EAST BETWEEN FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE TAGGED 7790[3] AND FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE MARKED SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY. 3. VERTICAL DATUM IS NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) PER CALIFORNIA REAL TIME NETWORK (CRTN), EPOCH 2017.5. 4. TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN WAS PERFORMED BY FIELD SURVEY IN MAY OF 2022 BY CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP INC. 5. EXISTING EASEMENTS SHOWN WERE BASED ON TITLE REPORT FROM FIRST AMERICAN TITLE, DATED MARCH 28, 2022. SURVEY NOTES EXISTING (EX.) BOUNDARY LINE EXISTING OFFSITE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING INTERIOR LOT LINE EXISTING EASEMENT (ESMT) AS NOTED EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING STRIPING EXISTING JOINT TRENCH EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET LEGEND 3 1. IF EXISTING WELLS OR TANKS ARE FOUND WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE, THEY SHALL BE ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SONOMA COUNTY PERMIT & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AND AN ABANDONMENT PERMIT WILL BE PROCURED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. 2. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN. LOCATION TO BE FIELD VERIFIED/POTHOLED DURING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 3. ALL ABOVE GROUND ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATION LINES ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE WITHIN HIGHWAY 116 RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE UNDERGROUNDED. 4. PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES IN PLACE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. NOTES SHEET INDEX SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE C0.00 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP C0.10 COLORED MAP EXHIBIT C1.00 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.00 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C3.00 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C4.00 HORIZONTAL CONTROL & STRIPING PLAN C5.00 STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN C5.10 STORMWATER CONTROL TABLES C6.00 SECTIONS C7.00 UTILITY PROFILES C7.10 UTILITY PROFILES C7.20 UTILITY PROFILES C8.00 PRELIMINARY OFFSITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN C8.10 ULTIMATE OFFSITE PLAN C9.0 FIRE ACCESS PLAN 233 of 539 4050 SH 4050 SH 4050 SH
4050 SH 4050 SH
3080 2070 FX 2070 FX 2070 FX 3080 2070 FX PR 3080 FR DR PR 3080 FR DR
PR 3080 FR DR PR 3080 FR DR 4050 SH
3080
3080 3080 Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 50 ft. 50 50 100
(E) DETENTION POND BLDG. B 7 UNITS
BLDG. E
6 UNITS
BLDG. X
5 UNITS
BLDG. W
5 UNITS
BLDG. F
6 UNITS
BLDG. L 6 UNITS
BLDG. M
6 UNITS
BLDG. J 6 UNITS
BLDG. K
6 UNITS
BLDG. Y
5 UNITS
BLDG. Z
6 UNITS
BLDG. AA
6 UNITS
BLDG. S
3 UNITS BLDG. A 9 UNITS
BLDG. U
8 UNITS
BLDG. H
6 UNITS
BLDG. I 6 UNITS
BLDG. G
6 UNITS
BLDG. C
3 UNITS
BLDG. T
3 UNIT
BLDG. BB
4 UNIT
BLDG. D
6 UNITS
BLDG. CC
3 UNITS
BLDG. V
4 UNITS
BLDG. N
3 UNITS
SS
SS
SS

SS SS SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSCO
SSCO
SSCO

SSCO SSCO SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS

SS SS SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS

SSCO SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS

SS SS SS SS SSCO
SS
SS

SS SSCO

WV WVWV

WV SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
F

IRR SSCO SSCO SS
WV WV
F
F

WV WV WV WV
F
F WV
F

WV WV WV WV WV WV WV WV F WV WV

WV WV F WV
WV F

F WV WV WV WV
F H
F H
F H
F H
F H
F H
F H
WV
WV

WV WV WV
WV
WV SS
SS
SS
SS

SS IRR IRR

IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR WV
WM
IRRWM

IRR WV WV WV WV WV
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
SVC
SVC

SVC SVC

SVC SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC

SVC JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT

SVC SVC SVC SVC SVC SVC SVC JT

SVC SVC

SVC SVC SVC

SVC SVC SVC SVC
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
JT

JT JT JT
EEUG
EEUG
SVC
JT
SD
SD
SDSD
SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD

SD A STREET

L STREET

B STREET C STREET

K STREET

J STREET

C STREET

I STREET

E STREET

F STREET

G STREET
H STREET D STREET (E) LOWE'S 55' TURNING RADIUS CONNECT TO EX. WATER MAIN SS P.O.C. CONNECT (N) SEWER TO (EX.) SEWER RIM= 100.75 (EX.) 8" INV.= 90.69 CONNECT TO EX. STORM DRAIN TRANSFORMER (6 TOTAL) SS POC IRR POC (LOT 2) JOINT TRENCH CONNECTION (SEE NOTE 5) EX. 10'± LOWE'S

ENCROACHMENT
EX. 15.0' SEWER ESMT
(DOC 2003-52342)
EX. ACCESS ESMT
(DOC 2004-154402)
EX. STORM

DRAIN ESMT
(DOC 88-058595 & 1992-0017108)
EX. 80' ROW
REDWOOD DRIVE GRAVENSTEIN HWY LOT 2 LOT 1 FW & DW POC JT POC (TYP) (2) DW/FW METER & BFP (2) IRR BFP & METER WL
8" SS
WL
WL WL
WL WL
WL
12"WL
WL
8" SS
8" SS
8" SS
8" SS 8" SS
8" SS 8" SS
8" SS
EX. JOINT TRENCH (SEE NOTE 6)
EX. GAS AND ELECTRIC
EX. 8" SS JOINT TRENCH CONNECTION (SEE NOTE 5) IRR POC (LOT 1) DW POC (TYP) FW POC (TYP)

11.0'

4.5' 4.8'
WL

FH (TYP)

15.5'
8" SS

5.5'

12.3' 13.0'

7.0'

4.0'

11.0'

4.5'

4.5' EX. 8" SS
EX. 8" SS
EX. 8" SS
EX. 10"SS
EX. 8" SS EX. 10"SS EX. 10"SS PROPOSED 10" WATER LINE PER CITY OF COTATI WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 2011 EX. 66"SD 8"WL 12"WL
EX. ACCESS ESMT
(DOC 2004-154402)
8"WL SSMH RIM 104.8 8" INV. 97.3 SSMH RIM 104.0 8" INV. 96.7 SSMH 16 RIM 105.0 8" INV. 96.2 SSMH 14 RIM 103.5 8" INV. 95.3 SSMH RIM 103.9 8" INV. 94.7 SSMH RIM 104.5 8" INV. 93.9 SSMH RIM 103.8 8" INV. 93.1 SSMH RIM 104.5 8" INV. 92.2 SSMH RIM 105.4 8" INV. 92.8 SSMH RIM 105.8 8" INV. 93.0 SSMH RIM 104.4 8" INV. 93.9 SSMH RIM 104.4 8" INV. 94.2 SSMH RIM 105.1 8" INV. 94.6 SSMH RIM 106.2 8" INV. 95.3 SSMH RIM 105.5 8" INV. 96.1 SSCO 05 RIM 101.2 8" INV. 96.16 SSCO RIM 105.3 8" INV. 98.05 SSCO RIM 105.7 8" INV. 95.72 SSMH RIM 105.5 8" INV. 94.93 SSMH RIM 104.5 8" INV. 93.74 SSMH RIM 105.3 8" INV. 91.19 SSC0 RIM 103.1 8" INV. 93.91 SSC0 RIM 105.3 8" INV. 94.86 SSC0 RIM 104.7 8" INV. 95.58 SSMH RIM 105.0 8" INV. 97.45 SSMH RIM 105.6 8" INV. 98.07 SSCO RIM 106.0 8" INV. 98.50 SSMH 15 RIM 103.5 8" INV. 95.46

7.0'
WL
WL
WL
WL WL PROPOSED 10" WATER LINE PER CITY OF COTATI WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 2011 PROPOSED 10" WATER LINE PER CITY OF COTATI WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 2011 WL WL C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN1:50 NOTES 1. SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES SHALL BE PRIVATE. 2. SEWER MAINS WERE DESIGNED WITH A SLOPE OF 0.6% (CITY MINIMUM IS 0.5%) 3. SEWER DEMAND IS 73,760 GPD. BASED ON CITY OF COTATI SEWER DESIGN GUIDLINES IN THE DESIGN STANDARDS - VOLUME 1, DATED DECEMBER 2019, FOR 134 UNITS 4. APPROXIMATE FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE. FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS WILL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LOCAL FIRE AUTHORITY 5. APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN. LOCATION TO BE FIELD VERIFIED/POTHOLED DURING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 6. ALL ABOVE GROUND ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATION LINES ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE WITHIN HIGHWAY 116 RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE UNDERGROUNDED. 4 BOUNDARY LINE OFFSITE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT (ESMT) JOINT TRENCH (JT) SANITARY SEWER (SS) STORM DRAIN (SD) WATER LINE (WL) FIRE WATER (FW) IRRIGATION LINE (IRR) JOINT TRENCH SERVICE STUB SANITARY SEWER LATERAL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (SDMH) STORM DRAIN INLET (DI) FIRE HYDRANT (FH) WATER VALVE (WV) BACKFLOW PREVENTER (BFP) METER BOX TRANSFORMER LEGEND SS SS JT JT JT X" SS WLWV WM IRR SVC SVC SVC SVC IRR IRR IRR F F F F EXISTING PROPOSED ABBREVIATIONS DW DOMESTIC WATER EX EXISTING GR GRATE INV INVERT SSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 234 of 539 4050 SH 4050 SH 4050 SH
4050 SH 4050 SH
3080 2070 FX 2070 FX 2070 FX 3080 2070 FX PR 3080 FR DR PR 3080 FR DR
PR 3080 FR DR PR 3080 FR DR 4050 SH
3080
3080 3080 BLDG. B 7 UNITS
BLDG. E
6 UNITS
BLDG. X
5 UNITS
BLDG. W
5 UNITS
BLDG. F
6 UNITS
BLDG. L 6 UNITS
BLDG. M
6 UNITS
BLDG. J 6 UNITS
BLDG. K
6 UNITS
BLDG. Y
5 UNITS
BLDG. Z
6 UNITS
BLDG. AA
6 UNITS
BLDG. S
3 UNITS BLDG. A 9 UNITS
BLDG. U
8 UNITS
BLDG. H
6 UNITS
BLDG. I 6 UNITS
BLDG. G
6 UNITS
BLDG. C
3 UNITS
BLDG. T
3 UNIT
BLDG. BB
4 UNIT
BLDG. D
6 UNITS
BLDG. CC
3 UNITS
BLDG. V
4 UNITS
BLDG. N
3 UNITS
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 50 ft. 50 50 100
R55'
R32'
(E) PROPERTY LINE
(EX.) 15' SEWER EASEMENT
(E) LOWE'S EDGE OF PAVEMENT 105.70 ± TP (CONFORM TO (E)

1.0%

0.5%

1.0%

0.5%

2.0%

0.5%

0.4%

0.5%

1.0% 1.0%

0.5%

1.3%
(E) SDMH(E)RIM 101.81(E)24" INV IN 98.26(E)30" INV OUT 97.76(N)18" INV IN 98.10 (E) SDMH(E)RIM 102.26(E)24" INV OUT 98.91(N)18" INV IN 99.0

CONNECT TO(E) SDMH
(E)RIM 101.26(E)30" INV IN 97.30(E)36" INV OUT 96.8(N)24" INV IN 97.30 (E)CATCH BASIN AT LOW POINT(E)TC 101.5
(E) DETENTION POND
(E)36" OUTFALL FL 94.0 4' HIGH RET. WALL (E) STOCKPILE TO BE REMOVED AND REGRADED ON-SITE

0.5%

0.5%
AC6

0.5%

1.0%

2.0%

0.4% 101.70 ± TP CONFORM TO (E) TOP OF PAVEMENT (N) ROAD SHOULDER (EDGE OF PAVEMENT)

2.0%

2.0% 105.85 ± TP (CONFORM TO (E) 103.47 ± TP (CONFORM TO (E) 0.6%

2.0%

2.0% DI 14 GR 103.90 15" INV. 100.62 DI 24 GR 105.80 15" INV. 102.50

2.0% DI 20 RIM 104.00 15" INV. 101.00 DI 05 GR 104.80 18" INV IN 98.5 15" INV IN 98.5 18" OUT 98.5 DI 01 GR 101.80 24" INV.IN 97.4 24" OUT 97.4 BC6
CC6
DC6
EC6
FC6 SDMH 02 RIM 103.6 24" INV.IN 98.1 24" OUT 98.1

0.5% C STREET
B ST. D STREET
A ST.

E STREET

K STREET

H STREET

G STREET

F STREET

E STREET

I STREET
J ST

C STREET
L ST. DI 03 GR 103.5 DI 02 GR 102.3 DI 04 GR 104.5
REDWOOD DR DI 07 GR 104.0

1.0% DI 21 GR 104.5
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
FC6 105.50 TP 103.68 TP/LP 105.45 TP 104.40 TP 105.80 TP/HP 104.53 TP/HP 105.28 TP/HP 103.09 TP/LP 103.84 TP 104.53 TP/HP 105.33 TP/HP 104.72 TP/HP103.46 TP 103.98 TP 105.00 TP/HP 106.12 TP 106.00 TP/HP 105.60 TP 105.35 TP 104.85 TP 104.25 TP/LP 105.64 TP 105.70 TP 105.30 TP/LP 105.50 TP 106.65 TP/HP 106.25 TP 106.20 TP/HP 106.00± TP/HP 100.81 FS/EG 105.70 TP/HP 105.55 TP/LP 105.39 TP/LP LOT 2 LOT 1 WL EX. SANITARY SEWER
EX. GAS AND ELECTRIC
EX. SANITARY SEWER
EX. 8" SS DISTURBED SOIL LIMIT

2.0%

2.0% C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN1:50 ABBREVIATIONS AD AREA DRAIN BLDG BUILDING CB CATCH BASIN DI DRAIN INLET (E) EXISTING EG EXISTING GROUND FL FLOWLINE GR GRATE HP HIGH POINT INV INVERT LP LOW POINT (N) NEW TC TOP OF CURB TP TOP OF PAVEMENT STORMWATER NOTES 1. SEE SHEET C5.00 FOR STORM WATER CONTROL PLAN. 2. STORM DRAIN DETENTION STORAGE PROVIDED BY EXISTING DETENTION POND ON LOWE'S SITE WHICH HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED 10 ACRE SITE PER DRAINAGE REPORT DATED APRIL 25,2005. FEMA NOTES THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN ZONE X PER FEMA MAPS ANS IS THERFORE OUTSIDE OF ANY FLOOD ZONES. EARTHWORK: CUT: 12,000 CUBIC YARDS FILL: 30,000 CUBIC YARDS NET: 18,000 CUBIC YARDS <FILL> LEGEND 5 AREA DRAIN STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN INLET STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTER LINE CURB LINE STORM DRAIN BIORETENTION FACILITY SIDEWALK/WALKWAY BIKE LANE PAVEMENT (ROW) MULTI-USE PATH SPOT ELEVATION OVERLAND FLOW RELEASE SD X.XX SD 235 of 539 4050 SH 4050 SH 4050 SH
4050 SH 4050 SH
3080 2070 FX 2070 FX 2070 FX 3080 2070 FX PR 3080 FR DR PR 3080 FR DR
PR 3080 FR DR PR 3080 FR DR 4050 SH
3080
3080 3080 VAN VAN VAN VAN
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER
SPACE

FOR LV HOUSE

PANEL MAIN

PULL METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER
SPACE

FOR LV HOUSE

PANEL MAIN

PULL METER
STACK

STACK METER

TESTBLOCK & METER

PANEL HOUSE

FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN

STACK METER
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER

STACK METER

STACK & METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER

PANEL HOUSE SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
METER

STACK & METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK BLDG. B 7 UNITS
BLDG. E
6 UNITS
BLDG. X
5 UNITS
BLDG. W
5 UNITS
BLDG. F
6 UNITS
BLDG. L 6 UNITS
BLDG. M
6 UNITS
BLDG. J 6 UNITS
BLDG. K
6 UNITS
BLDG. Y
5 UNITS
BLDG. Z
6 UNITS
BLDG. AA
6 UNITS
BLDG. S
3 UNITS BLDG. A 9 UNITS
BLDG. U
8 UNITS
BLDG. H
6 UNITS
BLDG. I 6 UNITS
BLDG. G
6 UNITS
BLDG. C
3 UNITS
BLDG. T
3 UNIT
BLDG. BB
4 UNIT
BLDG. D
6 UNITS
BLDG. CC
3 UNITS
BLDG. V
4 UNITS
BLDG. N
3 UNITS
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 50 ft. 50 50 100

REDWOOD DRIVE GRAVENSTEIN HWY
(E) DETENTION POND

A STREET

B STREET

L STREET C STREET C STREET

C STREET D STREET E STREET

E STREET

F STREET

G STREET

H STREET

I STREET

J STREET

K STREET NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING VAN VAN VAN VAN

PARKING
NO VAN

26.0' 4.5' 9.5' 9.0' TYP.

18.0'
TYP. 9.0' TYP.

18.0'
TYP.

26.0'

26.0' 9.0'

24.0'

26.0'

31.0'

26.0'

26.0' 26.0' 26.0'R=40'

26.0' R=35.0'
EX. 10' LOWE'S
ENCROACHMENT 16.3' TYP.

16.3' TYP. 20.0' (E) PROPERTY LINE (EX.) 15' SEWER EASEMENT (E) LOWE'S EDGE OF PAVEMENT (EX.) RW LINE
(E) LOWE'S 55' TURNING RADIUS 20' OR AS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE DISTRICT C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: HORIZONTAL CONTROL & STRIPING PLAN1:50 ABBREVIATIONS AD AREA DRAIN CB CATCH BASIN DI DRAIN INLET (E) EXISTING EG EXISTING GROUND FL FLOWLINE HP HIGH POINT INV INVERT LP LOW POINT (N) NEW TC TOP OF CURB TP TOP OF PAVEMENT 6 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTER LINE CURB LINE BIORETENTION FACILITY SIDEWALK/WALKWAY BIKE LANE PAVEMENT (ROW) MULTI-USE PATH 236 of 539

VAN VAN VAN VAN
8'-2
14"
T.P. T.P. T.P.

METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P.

METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P.

METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER
SPACE

FOR LV HOUSE

PANEL MAIN

PULL METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER
SPACE

FOR LV HOUSE

PANEL MAIN

PULL METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. STACK METER

TESTBLOCK & METER

PANEL HOUSE

FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN

STACK METER
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. METER

STACK & METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METERSTACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P.

METER

STACK & METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P.

METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. METER

STACK & METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER

STACK UP
T.P. BLDG. B 7 UNITS
BLDG. E
6 UNITS
BLDG. X
5 UNITS
BLDG. W
5 UNITS
BLDG. F
6 UNITS
BLDG. L 6 UNITS
BLDG. M
6 UNITS
BLDG. J 6 UNITS
BLDG. K
6 UNITS
BLDG. Y
5 UNITS
BLDG. Z
6 UNITS
BLDG. AA
6 UNITS
BLDG. S
3 UNITS BLDG. A 9 UNITS
BLDG. U
8 UNITS
BLDG. H
6 UNITS
BLDG. I 6 UNITS
BLDG. G
6 UNITS
BLDG. C
3 UNITS
BLDG. T
3 UNIT
BLDG. BB
4 UNIT
BLDG. D
6 UNITS
BLDG. CC
3 UNITS
BLDG. V
4 UNITS
BLDG. N
3 UNITS GRAVENSTEIN HWY
(E) DETENTION POND
SSCO
SSCO
SSCO

SSCO SSCO

SSCO SSCO SSCO SSCO SSCO
F H
F H
F H
F H
F H
F H
F H
EEUG
EEUG
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
(E) PROPERTY LINE (EX.) 15' SEWER EASEMENT
(E) LOWE'S EDGE OF PAVEMENT 101.1 ± TP (CONFORM TO (E) 105.70 ± TP (CONFORM TO (E) CONNECT TO(E) SDMH101.70 ± TP CONFORM TO (E) TOP OF PAVEMENT (N) ROAD SHOULDER (EDGE OF PAVEMENT) 105.85 ± TP (CONFORM TO (E) 103.47 ± TP (CONFORM TO (E) EX. WATER MAIN SS P.O.C. CONNECT (N) SEWER TO (EX.) SEWER RIM= 100.75 (EX.) 8" INV.= 90.69 EX. JOINT TRENCH EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN EX. ELECTRICEX. GAS (SEE SHEET C5.10) DMA 2 DMA 4 DMA 8 DMA 12 DMA 9 DMA 13 DMA 15 BR 2 DMA 10 DMA 14 DMA 16 DMA 17 DMA 18 DMA 19 BR 7 BR 8 BR 9 BR 10 BR 11 BR 13 BR 14 BR 15 BR 16 DMA 20DMA 21 DMA 1DMA 3 DMA 5DMA 6 DMA 7 DMA 11 BR 12 BR 1 BR 3 BR 6 BR 17 BR 4 BR 5 C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 Graphic Scale (in feet) 0 1 inch = 50 ft. 50 50 100 SCALE: STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN1:50 AD AREA DRAIN BR BIORETENTION CB CATCH BASIN DI DRAIN INLET (E) EXISTING EG EXISTING GROUND FL FLOWLINE HP HIGH POINT INV INVERT LP LOW POINT (N) NEW TC TOP OF CURB TP TOP OF PAVEMENT TOTAL SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA: 276,548 SF BIORETENTION SIZING: IMP. AREA X 0.04 = 11,062 SF OF BIORETENTION REQUIRED CURRENT AREA FOR PROPOSED BIORETENTION = 12,456 SF LEGEND BIORETENTION AREA SELF-TREATING AREA NOT TREATED AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA (PAVEMENT / HARDSCAPE) IMPERVIOUS AREA (ROOF) PERVIOUS AREA (LANDSCAPE) DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA BMP IDENTIFICATION WATER SHED IDENTIFICATION BMP BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES UNDERGROUND SILVA CELL BIORETENTION TREATMENT BIO # DMA # NOTES ABBREVIATIONS BOUNDARY LINE OFFSITE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT (ESMT) JOINT TRENCH (JT) SANITARY SEWER (SS) STORM DRAIN (SD) WATER LINE (WL) SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (SDMH) STORM DRAIN INLET (DI) LEGENDEXISTING PROPOSED 7 3
1 BIORETENTION AREA DETAIL
1 VARIES 18" MIN.
18" MIN.
18" MIN WIDTH VARIES SEE PLANS
12" MIN
PLANTING AREA, SEE PLANTING PLAN FLOW CONTROL DRAIN INLET BEYOND, SEE PLANS FOR ELEVATION CLASS 2 PERM. TOP SOIL TO BE OF THE FOLLOWING CONSISTENCY: ~10-20% TOPSOIL ~50-60% FINE SAND ~30-40% COMPOST MIN. INFILTRATION RATE = 5"/HR NATIVE SOIL UNCOMPACTED SUBGRADE BIORETENTION AREA CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. SCARIFY SUBGRADE BEFORE INSTALLING BIORETENTION AREA AGGREGATE AND BIORETNETION SOIL MEDIA. 2. INSTALL UNDERDRAIN WITH HOLES FACING DOWN. UNDERDRAIN DISCHARGE ELEVATION SHALL BE NEAR TOP OF AGGREGATE LAYER. UNDERDRAIN SLOPE MAY BE FLAT. 3. COMPACT EACH 6" LIFT OF BIORETENTION SOIL MEDIA WITH LANDSCAPE ROLLER OR BY LIGHTLY WETTING. IF WETTING, LET DRY OVERNIGHT BEFORE PLANTING. 4. NEVER WORK WITHIN BIORETENTION AREA LIMITS DURING RAIN OR UNDER WET CONDITIONS. 5. KEEP ALL HEAVY MACHINERY OUTSIDE BIORETENTION AREA LIMITS. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUBMITTALS CERTIFYING CLASS 2 PERM MEETS CALTRANS SPECIFICATION 68-2.02F(3) AND BIORETENTION SOIL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BASMAA "SPECIFICATION OF SOILS FOR BIORETENTION OR BIORETENTION FACILITIES". 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CIVIL ENGINEER 48 HOURS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF CLASS 2 PERM AND BIORETENTION SOIL FOR INSPECTION. 6" PERFORATED SDR 35 PIPE, HOLES FACE DOWN, 0.5% MIN, CONNECT TO STORM DRAIN INLET OR OUTFALL (PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AT ANGLE POINT AND ENDS) 237 of 539
C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN1:100 8 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 8 DMA 8 3834 ROOF 1.0 3834 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 2819 PAVEMENT 1.0 2819 4228 LANDSCAPE 0.1 423 TOTAL > 7076 0.04 283 420 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 9 DMA 9 1806 ROOF 1.0 1806 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 11370 PAVEMENT 1.0 11370 2843 LANDSCAPE 0.1 284 TOTAL > 13460 0.04 538 1025 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 10 DMA 10 1733 ROOF 1.0 1733 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 908 PAVEMENT 1.0 908 2117 LANDSCAPE 0.1 212 TOTAL > 2853 0.04 114 1008 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 13 DMA 13 1483 ROOF 1.0 1483 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 1210 PAVEMENT 1.0 1210 1815 LANDSCAPE 0.1 182 TOTAL > 2875 0.04 115 514 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 14 DMA 14 1607 ROOF 1.0 1607 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 3301 PAVEMENT 1.0 3301 4952 LANDSCAPE 0.1 495 TOTAL > 5403 0.04 216 798 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 15 DMA 15 0 ROOF 1.0 0 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 14293 PAVEMENT 1.0 14293 6126 LANDSCAPE 0.1 613 TOTAL > 14906 0.04 596 1045 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 16 DMA 16 36032 ROOF 1.0 36032 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 50564 PAVEMENT 1.0 50564 18097 LANDSCAPE 0.1 1810 TOTAL > 88406 0.04 3536 4510 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 17 DMA 17 5525 ROOF 1.0 5525 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 18518 PAVEMENT 1.0 18518 5381 LANDSCAPE 0.1 538 TOTAL > 24581 0.04 983 1006 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 18 DMA 18 0 ROOF 1.0 0 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF)0 PAVEMENT 1.0 00 LANDSCAPE 0.1 0 TOTAL > 0 0.04 0 0 * NO BIO ASSOCIATED WITH DMA 18. THIS 1 ACRE LOT WILL BE USED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. BIORETENTION TO BE DETERMINED DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 20 DMA 20 0 ROOF 1.0 0 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF)0 PAVEMENT 1.0 00 LANDSCAPE 0.1 0 TOTAL > 0 0.04 0 0 * DMA 20 IS AN EXISTING LOWE'S ENCROACHMENT BOUNDED BY THE EXISTING CURB ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, NO IMPROVEMENTS ARE PROPOSED WITHIN DMA 20. NO BIORETENTION ASSOCIATED WITH DMA 15 BECAUSE IT IS TREATED BY THE ADJACENT LOWE'S PROPERTY. SELF TREATING SELF TREATING NAME SELF TREATING AREA DMA 19 32152 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 21 DMA 21 0 ROOF 1.0 0 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF)0 PAVEMENT 1.0 00 LANDSCAPE 0.1 0 TOTAL > 0 0.04 0 0 * DMA 21 IS LOWE'S PROPERTY. NO IMPROVEMENTS ARE PROPOSED WITHIN DMA 21. NO BIORETENTION ASSOCIATED WITH DMA 21 BECAUSE IT IS TREATED BY LOWE'S PROPERTY. DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 1 DMA 1 7596 ROOF 1.0 7596 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 5623 PAVEMENT 1.0 5623 2103 LANDSCAPE 0.1 210 TOTAL > 13429 0.04 537 678 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 2 DMA 2 16216 ROOF 1.0 16216 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 7355 PAVEMENT 1.0 7355 9640 LANDSCAPE 0.1 964 TOTAL > 24535 0.04 981 1008 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 3 DMA 3 6354 ROOF 1.0 6354 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 13996 PAVEMENT 1.0 13996 2235 LANDSCAPE 0.1 224 TOTAL > 20574 0.04 823 860 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 4 DMA 4 5309 ROOF 1.0 5309 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 4916 PAVEMENT 1.0 4916 1293 LANDSCAPE 0.1 129 TOTAL > 10354 0.04 414 485 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 5 DMA 5 4126 ROOF 1.0 4126 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 1369 PAVEMENT 1.0 1369 3949 LANDSCAPE 0.1 395 TOTAL > 5890 0.04 236 261 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 6 DMA 6 9452 ROOF 1.0 9452 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 10943 PAVEMENT 1.0 10943 3169 LANDSCAPE 0.1 317 TOTAL > 20712 0.04 828 836 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 7 DMA 7 4467 ROOF 1.0 4467 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 1988 PAVEMENT 1.0 1988 4359 LANDSCAPE 0.1 436 TOTAL > 6891 0.04 276 580 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 11 DMA 11 5519 ROOF 1.0 5519 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 4697 PAVEMENT 1.0 4697 2146 LANDSCAPE 0.1 215 TOTAL > 10431 0.04 417 586 DMA NAME DMA AREA (SF) POST- PROJECT SURFACE TYPE DMA RUNOFF FACTOR DMA AREA X RUNOFF FACTOR IMP NAME BIO 12 DMA 12 2387 ROOF 1.0 2387 IMP SIZING FACTOR MIN. IMP SIZE (SF) PRO. IMP SIZE (SF) 15123 PAVEMENT 1.0 15123 2998 LANDSCAPE 0.1 300 TOTAL > 17810 0.04 712 808 238 of 539 C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: SECTIONSNTS SECTION A LAND SCAPE BUFFER (2.5') HALF OF ROADWAY (13') PROP LINE RET. WALL tw TW EXIST. GRND 2.0% SOUNDWALL S.L.D. ADJACENT PROP. CV PROP. CLASS I BIKE LANE (8') SHOULDER (2') SHOULDER (2') LANDSCAPE CONT. (X') CURB (6") SECTION D FINISHED GROUND PROPOSED PARK PROP LINE EXIST. GRND SOUNDWALL S.L.D. ADJACENT PROP. CV PROP. SECTION C FINISHED GROUND ROADWAY SECTION B 5.0' PROP LINE RET. WALL tw TW EXIST. GRND SOUNDWALL S.L.D. ADJACENT PROP. CV PROP. SECTION E FINISHED GROUND YARD FACE OF BLDG (E) 10' SEWER EASEMENT (E) 8" SS PROP LINE RET. WALL (E) LOWE'S CURB TW (E) LOWE'S PAVEMENT SOUNDWALL S.L.D. LOWE'S PROP. CV PROP. SECTION F FACE OF BLDG (E) 10' LOWE'S EASEMENT VARIES VARIES EX. SS LINE, SEE NOTE 1 EX. SD LINE, SEE NOTE 1 EX. WATER LINE, SEE NOTE 1 EX. SS LINE, SEE NOTE 1 NOTES: 1. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UTILITIES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. LOCATION TO BE FIELD VERIFIED/POTHOLED DURING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 2. SECTIONS DRAWN APPROXIMATELY TO SCALE. 9 14' MULTI-USE PATHWAY 11' HABITAT MEDIAN HWY 116 PAVEMENT FACE OF BLDG VARIES 5' SIDEWALK6' BIKE LANE EX. SS LINE, SEE NOTE 1 EX. TELECOM LINE, SEE NOTE 1

PROP R/W LINE
239 of 539
SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' A STREET 90 100 110 120 90100 110 120 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' B STREET 90 100 110 120 90100 110 120 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' C STREET 8090 100 110 120 8090100 110 120 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 DI 14
15" INV IN 100.62 N)
15" INV OUT 100.62 (E)
DI 18
15" INV IN 100.63 W)
15" INV OUT 100.63 (E)
SSMH 10
8" INV OUT 96.10 (E)
8" SS 128 LF S=0.0062
SSMH 09
8" INV IN 95.30 W)
8" INV IN 95.30 E)
8" INV OUT 95.30 (N)
8" SS 71 LF S=0.0060
SSCO 02
8" INV OUT 95.72 (W)
SSCO 04
8" INV OUT 98.05 (E)
8" SS 125 LF S=0.0060
SSMH 18
8" INV IN 97.30 W)
8" INV IN 97.30 N)
8" INV OUT 97.30 (E)
8" SS 97 LF S=0.0062
SSMH 17
8" INV IN 96.70 W)
8" INV OUT 96.70 (NE)
8" SS 90 LF S=0.0056
SSMH 16
8" INV IN 96.20 SW)
8" INV IN 96.20 NW)
8" INV OUT 96.20 (NE)
8" SS 126 LF S=0.0059
SSMH 15
8" INV IN 95.46 SW)
8" INV OUT 95.46 (NE) 8" SS 27 LF S=0.0059
SSMH 14
8" INV IN 95.30 NE)
8" INV IN 95.30 SW)
8" INV OUT 95.30 (NW)
8" SS 144 LF S=0.0060
SSCO 05
8" INV OUT 96.16 (SW)
15" SD 53 LF S=0.0028
DI 24
15" INV OUT 102.50 (E)
15" SD 212 LF S=0.0028
DI 23
15" INV IN 101.90 W)
15" INV OUT 101.90 (E)
DI 22
15" INV IN 101.75 W)
15" INV OUT 101.75 (E)
15" SD 189 LF S=0.0028
DI 21
15" INV IN 101.22 W)
15" INV OUT 101.22 (E) 15" SD 48 LF S=0.0028 15" SD 29 LF S=0.0028DI 07 18" INV IN 98.71 NW)
18" INV OUT 98.71 (NE)
DI 20
15" INV IN 101.00 SW)
15" INV OUT 101.00 (SE) 18" SD 39 LF S=0.0030
DI 06
18" INV IN 98.60 SW)
18" INV OUT 98.60 (E) 18" SD 33 LF S=0.0030 DI 05
18" INV IN 98.50 W)
15" INV IN 98.50 SE)
18" INV OUT 98.50 (NE) 18" SD 32 LF S=0.0028
DI 04
18" INV IN 98.41 SW)
15" INV IN 98.41 SE)
18" INV OUT 98.41 (NE)
18" SD 109 LF S=0.0028
SDMH 02
18" INV IN 98.10 SW)
15" INV IN 98.10 NW)
24" INV OUT 98.10 (NE) 24" SD 34 LF S=0.0037 24" SD 25 LF S=0.0037 DI 03 24" INV IN 97.88 SW)
24" INV OUT 97.88 (NE)
24" SD 80 LF S=0.0037
DI 02
24" INV IN 97.59 SW)
24" INV OUT 97.59 (NE)
24" SD 50 LF S=0.0037 DI 01
24" INV IN 97.40 SW)
24" INV OUT 97.40 (NW)

2.0% 1.0%

1.0% 1.4%
1+17.19 GB
CL 105.6
1+49.00 GB
CL 106.2
2+19.76 GB
CL 105.5
3+49.27 GB
CL 103.7
3+80.00 GB
CL 104.0

2.0% 0.5% 0.6% 0.5% 0.1% 0.0%
1+19.00 GB
CL 105.4
1+49.00 GB
CL 106.0
2+19.18 GB
CL 105.6
2+75.66 GB
CL 105.3
3+02.66 GB
CL 105.4
3+48.70 GB
CL 105.5
3+88.70 GB
CL 105.5 0.5% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 1.0% 1.0%

1.0%
1+00.00 GB
CL 105.5
2+53.17 GB
CL 106.2
3+55.16 GB
CL 105.6
5+16.22 GB
CL 104.8
6+29.15 GB
CL 104.2
7+01.34 GB
CL 105.0
8+56.52 GB
CL 103.5
15" SD
INV 101.83
15" SD
INV 99.80 15" SD 232 LF S=0.0030 PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE GR 103.9
GR 105.8
GR 105.7
GR 105.4
GR 104.5
GR 104.0
GR 104.0
GR 104.7
GR 104.8
GR 104.5
GR 103.5
GR 102.3
GR 101.8
RIM 105.5
RIM 106.2
RIM 105.7
RIM 105.3
RIM 104.8
RIM 104.0
RIM 105.0
RIM 103.5
RIM 103.6
RIM 103.5
RIM 101.2
36" SD
INV 96.15 C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: UTILITY PROFILES1:30 10 240 of 539 SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' D STREET 8090 100 110 120 8090100 110 120 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' E STREET 8090 100 110 120 8090100 110 120 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' F STREET 8090 100 110 120 8090100 110 120 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' G STREET 8090 100 110 120 8090100 110 120 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' H STREET 8090 100 110 120 8090100 110 120 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 1.0% 1.0% 0.4% 0.0% 1+00.00 GB
CL 103.7
1+77.05 GB
CL 104.4
3+02.05 GB
CL 105.7
3+55.16 GB
CL 105.5
3+95.16 GB
CL 105.5 0.1% 1.0% 0.9% 0.5%
1+00.00 GB
CL 104.4
1+35.60 GB
CL 104.4
2+79.32 GB
CL 105.8
4+26.97 GB
CL 104.5
5+76.25 GB
CL 105.3 0.5%
1+00.00 GB
CL 103.8
2+49.28 GB
CL 103.1 0.5%
1+00.00 GB
CL 104.5
2+59.67 GB
CL 105.3 0.5%
1+00.00 GB
CL 104.0
2+48.50 GB
CL 104.7
SSMH 07
8" INV IN 94.20 E)
8" INV OUT 94.20 (N)
8" SS 76 LF S=0.0052
SSMH 08
8" INV IN 94.60 S)
8" INV IN 94.60 E)
8" INV OUT 94.60 (W)
8" SS 56 LF S=0.0060
DI 14
15" INV IN 100.62 N)
15" INV OUT 100.62 (E)
SSCO 01
8" INV OUT 94.93 (W)
15" SD 158 LF S=0.0030 15" SD 47 LF S=0.0030 15" SD 169 LF S=0.0030 DI 13
15" INV IN 99.97 W)
15" INV IN 99.97 N)
15" INV OUT 99.97 (SE)
SSMH 07
8" INV IN 94.20 E)
8" INV OUT 94.20 (N)
8" SS 49 LF S=0.0061 SSMH 06
8" INV IN 93.90 S)
8" INV OUT 93.90 (NE) 8" SS 26 LF S=0.0061 SSMH 05
8" INV IN 93.74 SW)
8" INV OUT 93.74 (NE)
8" SS 121 LF S=0.0061
SSMH 04
8" INV IN 93.00 SW)
8" INV OUT 93.00 (NE) 8" SS 41 LF S=0.0049
SSMH 03
8" INV IN 92.80 SW)
8" INV OUT 92.80 (NE)
8" SS 101 LF S=0.0060
SSMH 02
8" INV IN 92.20 SW)
8" INV IN 92.20 SE)
8" INV OUT 92.20 (NE)
8" SS 148 LF S=0.0069
SSMH 01
8" INV IN 91.19 SW)
8" INV OUT 91.19 (N)
8" SS
72 LF
S=0.0069
SSMH 11
8" INV IN 93.10 SE)
8" INV IN 93.10 NE)
8" INV OUT 93.10 (NW)
8" SS 135 LF S=0.0060
SSCO 08
8" INV OUT 93.91 (SW)
SSMH 12
8" INV IN 93.90 SE)
8" INV IN 93.90 NE)
8" INV OUT 93.90 (NW)
8" SS 160 LF S=0.0060
SSCO 07
8" INV OUT 94.86 (SW)
SSMH 13
8" INV IN 94.70 SE)
8" INV IN 94.70 NE)
8" INV OUT 94.70 (NW)
8" SS 147 LF S=0.0060
SSCO 06
8" INV OUT 95.58 (SW)
15" SD
INV 100.34
DI 33
12" INV OUT 99.10 (E)
15" SD
INV 98.44
15" SD
INV 99.38 PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE GR 103.9
GR 105.7 GR 103.1
RIM 104.4
RIM 105.1
RIM 105.5
RIM 104.4
RIM 104.5
RIM 105.4
RIM 105.3
RIM 103.8
RIM 103.1
RIM 104.5
RIM 105.3
RIM 103.9
RIM 104.7 C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: UTILITY PROFILES1:30 11 241 of 539 SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' I STREET 8090 100 110 120 130 8090100 110 120 130 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' J STREET 8090 100 110 120 8090100 110 120 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' K STREET 8090 100 110 120 8090100 110 120 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 SCALE: HOR. 1" = 30' VERT. 1" = 6' L STREET 8090 100 110 120 8090100 110 120 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 1+00.00 GB
CL 104.5
2+37.26 GB
CL 103.8
3+75.78 GB
CL 104.5
5+14.27 GB
CL 104.0
6+20.90 GB
CL 103.5 0.5%
1+00.00 GB
CL 105.6
2+23.66 GB
CL 105.0

0.9% 0.5% 0.6%
1+00.00 GB
CL 104.8
1+20.80 GB
CL 105.0
2+31.81 GB
CL 105.6
3+01.81 GB
CL 106.0 0.4%
1+00.00 GB
CL 106.2
2+03.52 GB
CL 106.6
SSMH 02
8" INV IN 92.20 SW)
8" INV IN 92.20 SE)
8" INV OUT 92.20 (NE)
SSMH 11
8" INV IN 93.10 SE)
8" INV IN 93.10 NE)
8" INV OUT 93.10 (NW)
SSMH 12
8" INV IN 93.90 SE)
8" INV IN 93.90 NE)
8" INV OUT 93.90 (NW)
SSMH 13
8" INV IN 94.70 SE)
8" INV IN 94.70 NE)
8" INV OUT 94.70 (NW)
SSMH 14
8" INV IN 95.30 NE)
8" INV IN 95.30 SW)
8" INV OUT 95.30 (NW)
8" SS 156 LF S=0.0058 8" SS 139 LF S=0.0058 8" SS 138 LF S=0.0058 8" SS 101 LF S=0.0060 SDMH 02
18" INV IN 98.10 SW)
15" INV IN 98.10 NW)
24" INV OUT 98.10 (NE)
15" SD 148 LF S=0.0030
15" SD 142 LF S=0.0050
DI 28
15" INV IN 98.66 SW)
15" INV OUT 98.66 (SE)
DI 32
15" INV OUT 99.71 (SE)
DI 27
15" INV IN 98.22 NW)
15" INV OUT 98.22 (SE)
DI 31
15" INV IN 99.00 NW)
15" INV OUT 99.00 (NE) 15" SD 38 LF S=0.0030
SSMH 20
8" INV IN 98.07 NE)
8" INV OUT 98.07 (SW)
8" INV OUT 98.07 (SE)
SSMH 16
8" INV IN 96.20 SW)
8" INV IN 96.20 NW)
8" INV OUT 96.20 (NE)
8" SS 124 LF S=0.0152
SSMH 18
8" INV IN 97.30 W)
8" INV IN 97.30 N)
8" INV OUT 97.30 (E)
SSMH 20
8" INV IN 98.07 NE)
8" INV OUT 98.07 (SW)
8" INV OUT 98.07 (SE) 8" SS 25 LF S=0.0060SSMH 19
8" INV IN 97.45 NE)
8" INV OUT 97.45 (S)
8" SS 104 LF S=0.0060 8" SS 71 LF S=0.0060
SSCO 03
8" INV OUT 98.50 (SW)
DI 29
15" INV OUT 98.86 (NE) 15" SD 68 LF S=0.0030
SSMH 09
8" INV IN 95.30 W)
8" INV IN 95.30 E)
8" INV OUT 95.30 (N)
SSMH 08
8" INV IN 94.60 S)
8" INV IN 94.60 E)
8" INV OUT 94.60 (W)
8" SS 121 LF S=0.0058
15" SD
INV 101.37
18" SD
INV 99.02
15" SD
INV 102.12
DI 05
18" INV IN 98.50 W)
15" INV IN 98.50 SE)
18" INV OUT 98.50 (NE) PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE AT CENTERLINE APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE GR 104.2
GR 104.2
GR 103.6
GR 104.8
GR 106.0
RIM 104.5
RIM 103.8
RIM 104.5
RIM 103.9
RIM 103.5
RIM 103.6
RIM 105.6
RIM 104.8
RIM 105.6
RIM 106.0
RIM 106.2
RIM 105.1 C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: UTILITY PROFILES1:30 12 242 of 539 T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER
SPACE

FOR LV HOUSE

PANEL MAIN

PULL METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
2 BED
1 BED
1 BED BLDG. B 7 UNITS
BLDG. S
3 UNITS BLDG. A 9 UNITS NO PARKING NO PARKING Graphic Scale (in feet) 0 1 inch = 50 ft. 50 50 100 0.5%

0.5%

2.0%

0.5% 0.5% 20' EVA AND CLASS I PATHWAY

0.5%

2.0%

2.0%0.6% C STREET
A ST.

B ST.25.0' RW DEDICATION 14.0' 11.0'
(E) 80'± RW
(E) GAS
(E) SANITARY SEWER 18.2' 12.0'12.0'

28.8'12.0' LEFT TURN LANE 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 8+96.39 Hwy 116 CL 1+65.50 ??? Hwy 116 CL 4+20.08 A STREET CL 1+00 B STREET CL 1+00 ???

JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT
JT
SD
SD
SD SD 105.50 TP 104.85 TP 106.12 TP 104.25 TP/LP 105.64 TP 105.70 TP 106.25 TP 106.20 TP/HP 105.55 TP/LP 106.00± TP/HP 105.39 TP/LP 1 3
2 PROPOSED RW LINE 105.70 ± TP (CONFORM TO (E) EX. RW LINE CONFORM TO (E) PVMT 105.85 ± TP (CONFORM TO (E) DI 24 GR 105.80 15" INV. 102.50 12.0' WESTBOUND TRAVEL LANE BUFFER STRIPING CONFORM TO (E) STRIPING CONFORM TO (E) SW 14.0' MULTI-USE PATH 14.0' MULTI-USE PATH 6.0' BIKE PATH 5.0' SIDEWALK (E) SW BEVELED ROLLED CURB GRAVENSTEIN HWY BICYCLE PATH STOP SIGN SCALE: HOR. 1" = 50' VERT. 1" = 5' GRAVENSTEIN HWY PROFILE 95 100 105 110 115 95100 105 110 115 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 8+96.39 1+29.67 GB
CL 106.3
2+57.30 GB
CL 106.3
3+81.41 GB
CL 106.4
7+99.85 GB
CL 106.5
8+81.34 GB
CL 106.9

0.29% 0.09% 0.06% 0.01% 0.02% 0.05% 0.00% 0.08%0.22% 0.00% 0.02% 0.49% (E) GAS (APPROXIMATE DEPTH)
(E) SANITARY SEWER
(APPROXIMATE DEPTH) APPROXIMATE (E) GRADE AT CENTER LINE (E) GRADE AT FLOWLINE C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: PRELIMINARY OFFSITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN1:50 13 SCALE:
= GRAVENSTEIN HWY PLAN VIEW 1" 50' ABBREVIATIONS AD AREA DRAIN BLDG BUILDING CB CATCH BASIN CL CENTERLINE DI DRAIN INLET (E) EXISTING EG EXISTING GROUND FL FLOWLINE GR GRATE HP HIGH POINT INV INVERT LP LOW POINT (N) NEW RW RIGHT OF WAY TC TOP OF CURB TP TOP OF PAVEMENT LEGEND AREA DRAIN STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN INLET STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTER LINE CURB LINE STORM DRAIN SD X.XX SD

PROPOSED
ROW 14' MULTI-USE PATHWAY 11' LANDSCAPE HWY 116 PAVEMENT VARIES 5' SIDEWALK 6' BIKE LANE EX. SS LINE, SEE NOTE 1 EX. TELECOM LINE, SEE NOTE 1 25.0' ROW DEDICATION EX. 80' ± ROW EX. CL 4.5' BUFFER BUFFER STRIPING (VARIES) 12.0' EASTBOUND TRAVEL LANE EX. SHOULDER (VARIES) VARIES EX. EDGE OF PVMT 24.0' (N) PVMT 12.0' WESTBOUND TRAVEL LANE EX. WATER LINE, SEE NOTE 1 SCALE: NTS 1 GRAVENSTEIN HWY SECTION SCALE: NTS3 GRAVENSTEIN HWY SECTION BIORETENTION FACILITY SIDEWALK/WALKWAY BIKE LANE PAVEMENT (ROW) MULTI-USE PATH SPOT ELEVATION STORMWATER OVERLAND FLOW RELEASE SEE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, SHEET C3.0 LEGEND FACE OF BLDG FACE OF BLDG 243 of 539

VAN VAN VAN VAN
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER

STACK & METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER
SPACE

FOR LV HOUSE

PANEL MAIN

PULL METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER
SPACE

FOR LV HOUSE

PANEL MAIN

PULL METER
STACK

STACK METER

TESTBLOCK & METER

PANEL HOUSE

FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN

STACK METER
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER

STACK & METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER

STACK METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
METER

STACK & METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 50 ft. 50 50 100

REDWOOD DRIVE GRAVENSTEIN HWY
(E) DETENTION POND
(E) PROPERTY LINE

A STREET

B STREET

L STREET C STREET C STREET

C STREET D STREET E STREET

E STREET

F STREET

G STREET

H STREET

I STREET

J STREET

K STREET
(EX.) RW LINE NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING VAN VAN VAN VAN

PARKING
NO VAN C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: ULTIMATE OFFSITE LAYOUT1:50 13 FOR REFERENCE ONLY A ST C STREET

INTERIM CONDITION
244 of 539
T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METERSTACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P.

METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER
SPACE

FOR LV HOUSE

PANEL MAIN

PULL METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE SPACE

FOR LV PANEL MAIN

PULL METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. STACK METER

TESTBLOCK & METER

PANEL HOUSE

FOR LV SPACE

PULL MAIN

STACK METER
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P.

METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER

STACK & METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P.

METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METERSTACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK T.P. T.P.

T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METERSTACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. T.P. METER
STACK

TESTBLOCK & METER

PANEL HOUSE SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAINMETER
STACK
T.P. T.P. METER

STACK & METER

TESTBLOCK HOUSE

PANEL SPACE
FOR LV

PULL MAIN METER
STACK
UP
T.P.
3 BED
3 BED
2 BED
2 BED
2 BED
2 BED
3 BED
COMM. RM.
1 BED
1 BED
1 BED
1 BED
1 BED
1 BED
1 BED BLDG. B 7 UNITS
BLDG. E
6 UNITS
BLDG. X
5 UNITS
BLDG. W
5 UNITS
BLDG. F
6 UNITS
BLDG. L 6 UNITS
BLDG. M
6 UNITS
BLDG. J 6 UNITS
BLDG. K
6 UNITS
BLDG. Y
5 UNITS
BLDG. Z
6 UNITS
BLDG. AA
6 UNITS
BLDG. S
3 UNITS BLDG. A 9 UNITS
BLDG. U
8 UNITS
BLDG. H
6 UNITS
BLDG. I 6 UNITS
BLDG. G
6 UNITS
BLDG. C
3 UNITS
BLDG. T
3 UNIT
BLDG. BB
4 UNIT
BLDG. D
6 UNITS
BLDG. CC
3 UNITS
BLDG. V
4 UNITS
BLDG. N
3 UNITS NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING VAN VAN VAN VAN

PARKING
NO VAN
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 50 ft. 50 50 100 GRAVENSTEIN HWY 4050 SH 4050 SH 4050 SH 4050 SH 4050 SH
3080 2070 FX 2070 FX 2070 FX 3080 2070 FX PR 3080 FR DR PR 3080 FR DR
PR 3080 FR DR PR 3080 FR DR 4050 SH
3080
3080 3080 C STREET 25.0' RW DEDICATION 14.0' 11.0'
(E) 80'± RW16.2' 12.0' 12.0'

28.8'12.0' LEFT TURN LANE
WV F
IRR
WV WV
F
F

WV WV WV WV
F
F WV
F

WV WV WV WV WV WV WV WV F WV WV

WV WV F WV
WV
F

F WV WV WV WV
F H
F H
F H
F H
F H
F H
F H
WV
WV

WV WV WV
WV

WV IRR IRR

IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR WV
WM
IRRWM

IRR WV WV WV WV WV
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT

JT JT JT
JT
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD PROPOSED RW LINE EX. RW LINE CONFORM TO (E) PVMT BUFFER STRIPING 14.0' MULTI-USE PATH 14.0' MULTI-USE PATH 6.0' BIKE PATH (E) SW BEVELED ROLLED CURB 150' FIRE HYDRANT RADIUS (TYPICAL) FH FH FH FH FH FH FH 159.67'
148.5'
149.28' EX. FH 31.0'

26.0'

26.0' 26.0' 20.0'

26.0' FW POC FW POC FW POC FW POC FW POC FW POC FW POC FW POC FW POC FW POC FW POC 20' EVA AND CLASS I PATHWAY

A STREET

L STREET

B STREET

C STREET

I STREET

E STREET

F STREET

G STREET

H STREET D STREET

K STREET

J STREET
103.45'
172.07'

30.46' 20' OR AS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE DISTRICT 30°
60° 90° 120°
150° 180°
(Outer Wheel) 34ftMin Radius 21.816ftMin Radius (Inner Wheel) 37.019ftMin Radius (Outer Body)

21.381ft Max Kickout 0.286ft Vehicle Tracking V23.00.2518(20220215) (c) Autodesk, Inc. www.Autodesk.com Title:Mack TerraPro Low Entry 6x4 LEU 613 + Wayne Phoenix III 25Yd Notes: Turn(s) based upon a design speed of 5.00mph. C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S ArchitecturePlanningInteriors 444 Spear Street, Suite 105 San Francisco, CA 94105 www.hunthalejones.com t. 415-512-1300 f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT: CITY VENTURES COTATI CALIFORNIA 03.17.2025 317068.00 PAGE NO.: OF 15 SCALE: PRELIMINARY FIRE ACCESS PLAN1:50 15 SCALE:
= GRAVENSTEIN HWY PLAN VIEW 1" 50' ABBREVIATIONS AD AREA DRAIN BLDG BUILDING CB CATCH BASIN CL CENTERLINE DI DRAIN INLET (E) EXISTING EG EXISTING GROUND FL FLOWLINE GR GRATE HP HIGH POINT INV INVERT LP LOW POINT (N) NEW RW RIGHT OF WAY TC TOP OF CURB TP TOP OF PAVEMENT LEGEND AREA DRAIN STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN INLET STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTER LINE CURB LINE STORM DRAIN SD SD BIORETENTION FACILITY SIDEWALK/WALKWAY BIKE LANE PAVEMENT (ROW) MULTI-USE PATH BIKE TURNING RADIUS R=40.0 ' R=20.0 ' R=40.0 ' R=20.0 ' 245 of 539

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES

REDWOOD ROW

COTATI, CA
12/13/2023
L-1
03/17/2025

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN IMAGERY
246 of 539

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURESREDWOOD ROWCOTATI, CA
12/13/2023
L-2
04/07/2025

ADJACENT
LOWES
LEGEND
Community Pool and Deck Children’s Play Area and Community ParkPublic ParkExisting Oak Trees to be RemainBioretention BasinsSocial Seating AreasWoonerf Style AlleyBike Path - Varies 4’ to 8’ WideShared Use Path - 14’ WideProperty LinePrivate Yards (Size Varies; 150 SF Minimum)Bike RacksTransformerAffordable Housing Residential UnitsCommercial Plaza with Optional Plaza Seating 56789
101112131415
4321
1 2
3 GRAVENSTEIN HIGHWAY

REDWOOD DRIVE
11 12
4 24
11 6
12 88
10 10
10 13
6 11
7 7
7 7
8 5
13 10
14 COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE
Community Pool and Deck 19,570 L-4Public Children’s Play Area and Community Park 26,640 L-4Public Dog Park 20,570 L-3Gravenstein Highway Streetscape 16,020 -

SYMBOL NAME SIZE (SF) SHEET
3214
9 15
9 8
5 0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”

CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
247 of 539

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES

REDWOOD ROW

COTATI, CA
12/13/2023
L-3
03/17/2025
LEGEND
Common Area Walk
Open Recreational Turf Area
Perimeter Fence (Wood, 6’ ht.)
Common Area Landscape
Private Yard (Size Varies; 150 SF Minimum)
Flowering Accent Tree
Screen Tree
Shade Tree
Dog Park Entry (Double Gates)
Dog Park Fencing (Metal, 5’ ht.)
Park Bench - Metal
Bike Racks - Metal
Bike Path - 5’ Width
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 4
3 2
1 KEYMAP
ENLARGEMENT A:

SCALE: 1”=20’-0”

SMALL DOGS
1,520 SQFT

LARGE DOGS
3,340 SQFT
1 1
7 13
13 8
9 9 10
11 11
12 10
10 2
3 3
4 5 5
6 0 10’ 20’ 40’
Scale: 1”= 20’-0”

CONCEPTUAL PUBLIC PARK PLAN
248 of 539

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES

REDWOOD ROW

COTATI, CA
12/13/2023
L-4
03/17/2025
ENLARGEMENT B:

SCALE: 1”=20’-0”
LEGEND
Central Traffic Circle with Enhanced Paving
Pool Building (Approximately 1,200 SF)
-Community Room
-Restrooms
-Equipment
Dining Patio
Shade Structure - Wood (Painted)
Barbecue Island
Pool
Accessible Parking
Children’s Play Area (Approximately 2,000 SF)
Heritage Oak Tree (Existing, to remain)
Meandering Decomposed Granite Path (4’ Wide)
Lounge Seating
Common Area Walk (4’ Width Minimum)
Open Recreational Turf Area (Approximately 2,500 SF)
Private Yards (Size Varies; 150 SF Minimum)
Shade Tree
Flowering Accent Tree
Bike Path - 5’ Width
Bioretention Basin
Spa
5 5
6 6
7 8
8 9
9 10
10 11
11 11
11 12
12 12
12 13
13 14 14
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 7
7 17
18 19
18 18 18
19 18
4 4
3 3
2 1
1 2
KEYMAP
0 10’ 20’ 40’
Scale: 1”= 20’-0”

CONCEPTUAL CENTRAL PARK PLAN
249 of 539
1 7
2 1
2 3
4 4
6 5
3 8
8 3

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES

REDWOOD ROW

COTATI, CA
12/13/2023
L-5
03/17/2025
ENLARGEMENT C:

SCALE: 1”=10’-0” KEYMAP
LEGEND
Woonerf**
String Lighting
Concrete Sidewalk
Bench Seating
Bioretention Basin
Perimeter Wall
Private Patio
Decorative Paving
** Design-level Woonerf details will be provided on the project improvement plans. These details will demonstrate compliance with Cotati Municipal Code (CMC) §17.36.100(F), and include the following: Traffic calming features, length and width of woonerf, transition zones, width of motor vehicle travel lane, distance between
woonerf entrance/exit from Highway 116 and the
parking spaces located within the woonerf, number of
parking spaces proposed in the woonerf and compliance with CMC §17.36.100(F)(3), proposed signage, pavement treatment, landscaping, lighting, seating, and other amenities.
5 6
7 8
4 3
2 1
0 5’ 10’ 20’
Scale: 1”= 10’-0”

CONCEPTUAL WOONERF ALLEYS PLAN
250 of 539

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES

REDWOOD ROW

COTATI, CA
12/13/2023
L-6
03/17/2025
LEGEND
Masonry Wall on Piers [or similar] (6’ ht.) - 800 LF
Perimeter Fence [or similar] (Wood, 6’ ht.) - 1,790 LF
Pool Enclosure Fence ([or similar] Metal, 6’ ht.) - 235 LF Dog Park Fence [or similar] (Metal, 5’ ht.) - 420 LF
Patio Fence and Gate [or similar] (Wood, 3’-6” ht.) - 3,800 LF Retaining Wall (Block, Height varies per Civil) - 120 LF 0 20’ 40’ 80’
Scale: 1”= 40’-0”

CONCEPTUAL WALL AND FENCE PLAN
251 of 539

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES

REDWOOD ROW

COTATI, CA
12/13/2023
L-7
03/17/2025
NOTE: SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO MWELO AND AVAILABILITY
TREES (24” BOX SIZE MINIMUM)

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME
Acer spp. Maple
Arbutus ‘Marina’ Marina Strawberry Tree
Betula pedula ‘Dalecaslica’ Cutleaf Weeping Birch
Betula utilis var. jacquemonlii Himalayan Birch
Callistemon citrinus Lemon Bottle Brush
Cercis canadensis Eastern Rosebud
Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud
Cinnamomum camphor Camphor Tree
Cornus florida ‘Rubra’ Pink Flowering DogwooD
Fraxinus spp Ash
Ginko biloba ‘Goldspine’ Autumn Gold Maindenhair Tree
Gleditsia triacanthos ‘Moraine’ Moraine Honeylocust
Gleditsia triacanthos ‘Rubylace’ Red Honey Locust
Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree
Koelreuteria panicaulata Golden Rain Tree
Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle
Laurus nobilis Bay Laurel
Magnolia spp. Magnolia spp.

Olea ssp. Olive
Pinus spp. Pine
Pistachia chinensis Chinese Pistache
Platanus racemosa Sycamore
Prunus cerasifera Flowering Plum*
Punica granatum Pomegranate
Pyrus calleryana ‘Bradford’ Callery Pear
Pyrus kawakamii Evergreen Pear
Quercus spp. Oak
Tristania conferta Brisbane Box
Ulmus spp. Elm
Zelkova serrata Japanese Zelkova

CONCEPTUAL PLANT PALETTE

SHRUBS, GRASSES, AND GROUNDCOVER

SHRUBS, GRASSES, AND GROUNDCOVER
(5 GALLON SIZE MINIMUM)

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME
Agapanthus spp. Lily of the Nile
Agave spp. Agave
Arctostaphylos spp. Manzanita
Buxus japonica ‘Green Beauty’ Green Beauty Japanese Boxwood Camellia spp. Camellia
Carex glauca Blue Sedge
Carex tumulicola Foothill Sedge
Ceanothus sp. Wild Lilac
Cistus salviifolius ‘Prostratus’ Sageleaf Rockrose
Cistus ‘Sunset’ Magenta Rockrose
Cornus sericea Creek Dogwood
Cornus sericea ssp. Occidentails WesTern Dogwood
Cotoneaster dammeri ‘Lowfast’ Bearberry Cotoneaster
Crassula spp. Crassula
Dianella spp. Flax Lily
Dietes bicolor Fortnight Lily
Euonymus ssp. Euonymus
Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue
Grevillea spp. Grevillea
Helictotrichon s. ‘Sapphire’ Saphire Blue Oat Grass
Hemerocallis spp. Daylily
Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon
Ilex spp. Holly
Iris douglasiana Douglas’ Iris
Juncus patens California Gray Rush
Lantana montevidensis Trailing Lantana
Lavandula ssp. Lavender
Lavatera sp. Tree Mallow
Leymus condensatus ‘Canyon Prince’ Canyon Prince Wild Rye Leymus glaucus Creeping Wildrye
Ligustrum japonicum ‘Texanum’ Waxleaf Privet
Lomandra sp. Dwarf Mat Rush
Lonicera ssp. Honeysuckle
Mimulus sp. Monkey Flower
Muhlenbergia ssp. Deer Grass
Myoporum p. ‘Putah Creek’ Creeping Myoporum
Olea europaea ‘Little Ollie’ Little Ollie Dwarf Olive

VINE AND ESPALIER

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME
Distictis buccinatoria Scarlet Trumpet Vine
Eriobotrya ssp. Loquat
Ficus pumila Creeping Fig
Rosa banksiae Lady Banks’ Rose
Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine
Phormium spp. New Zealand Flax
Pittosporum spp. Pittosporum
Podocarpus elongatus ‘lcee Blue’ lcee Blue Yellow-wood
Polystichum sp. Fern
Prunus caroliniana ‘Bright n Tight Bright N Tight Carolina Laurel Rhaphiolepis sp. Indian Hawthorn
Rosa spp. Rose
Rosmarinus officinalis Rosemary
Salvia spp. Sage
Sedum spp. Stonecrop
Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine
Westringia sp. Coast Rosemary

CONCEPTUAL PLANT PALETTE AND IMAGERY
(5 GALLON SIZE MINIMUM)
(5 GALLON SIZE MINIMUM)
252 of 539

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
DATE:

PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES

REDWOOD ROW

COTATI, CA
12/13/2023
L-8
03/17/2025

WOONERF IMAGERY
253 of 539

COLOR BOARD
C&M-001
C 1999 HUNT HALE JONES ARCHITECTS
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
C 1999 HUNT HALE JONES ARCHITECTS
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

COTATI, CA

04.01.2025 317068.00

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7757

HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 2821

DOWNING STONE
BODY PAINT COLOR 02

TRIM PAINT COLOR

COLOR & MATERIALS
STONE
ELDORADO STONE : CUT COARSE
PRADO

OMEGA PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL
COLOR : 10
BODY PAINT COLOR 01

ACCENT & FRENCH DOO

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7053

ADAPTIVE SHADE
BODY PAINT COLOR 03

GARAGE DOOR
GAF: TIMBERLINE HDZ RS
(COOL ROOF SHINGLE)

SAGEWOOD
ROOF

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7069

IRON ORE

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7757

HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE

ENTRY DOOR

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7069

IRON ORE

CONCEPTUAL
254 of 539

COLOR BOARD
C&M-002
C 1999 HUNT HALE JONES ARCHITECTS
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
C 1999 HUNT HALE JONES ARCHITECTS
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

COTATI, CA

04.01.2025 317068.00

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7757

HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
BODY PAINT COLOR 02

TRIM PAINT COLOR

COLOR & MATERIALS
STONE
ELDORADO STONE : CUT COARSE
PRADO

OMEGA PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL
COLOR : 10
BODY PAINT COLOR 01

ACCENT & FRENCH DOO

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7060

ATTITUDE GRAY
BODY PAINT COLOR 03

GARAGE DOOR
GAF: TIMBERLINE HDZ RS
(COOL ROOF SHINGLE)

SAGEWOOD
ROOF

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7069

IRON ORE

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7757

HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE

ENTRY DOOR

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7069

IRON ORE

CONCEPTUAL
255 of 539

COLOR BOARD
C&M-003
C 1999 HUNT HALE JONES ARCHITECTS
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
C 1999 HUNT HALE JONES ARCHITECTS
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

COTATI, CA

04.01.2025 317068.00

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7757

HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 6151

QUIVER TAN
BODY PAINT COLOR 02

TRIM PAINT COLOR

COLOR & MATERIALS
STONE
ELDORADO STONE : CUT COARSE
PRADO

OMEGA PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL
COLOR : 10
BODY PAINT COLOR 01

ACCENT & FRENCH DOO

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7645

THUNDER GRAY
BODY PAINT COLOR 03

GARAGE DOOR
GAF: TIMBERLINE HDZ RS
(COOL ROOF SHINGLE)

SAGEWOOD
ROOF

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7675

SEALSKIN

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7757

HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE

ENTRY DOOR

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 9132

ACACIA HAZE

CONCEPTUAL
256 of 539

COLOR BOARD
C&M-004
C 1999 HUNT HALE JONES ARCHITECTS
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
C 1999 HUNT HALE JONES ARCHITECTS
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288 DATE: PROJECT:

CITY VENTURES
COTATI

COTATI, CA

04.01.2025 317068.00

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7757

HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7052

GRAY AREA
BODY PAINT COLOR 02

TRIM PAINT COLOR

COLOR & MATERIALS
STONE
ELDORADO STONE : CUT COARSE
PRADO

OMEGA PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL
COLOR : 10
BODY PAINT COLOR 01

ACCENT & FRENCH DOO

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7054

SUITABLE BROWN
BODY PAINT COLOR 03

GARAGE DOOR
GAF: TIMBERLINE HDZ RS
(COOL ROOF SHINGLE)

SAGEWOOD
ROOF

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7675

SEALSKIN

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7757

HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE

ENTRY DOOR

SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR : SW 7743

MOUNTAIN ROAD

CONCEPTUAL
257 of 539

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15183
Redwood Row Project
LEAD AGENCY:

CITY OF COTATI

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
201 WEST SIERRA AVENUE
COTATI, CA 94931
PREPARED BY:

METROPOLITAN PLANNING GROUP
APRIL 2025
258 of 539
[PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
259 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project i CEQA Analysis

REDWOOD ROW
Project Title: Redwood Row
Lead Agency: City of Cotati: Community Development Department 201 West Sierra Avenue
Cotati, CA 94931
Contact Person: Jon-Paul Harries, Senior Planner
707-665-3634
Project Location: Gravenstein Highway, City of Cotati, Sonoma County, California APNs: 046-286-017, -018, 019, and -020
Project
Sponsor(s)/Owners:

Adam Foster
City Ventures
1185 Mason Street
San Francisco, CA 94123
(925) 323-0443
[email protected]
General Plan
Designation:

General Commercial (GC)
Zoning: Commercial, Gravenstein Corridor (CG)
Description of project: The Project will merge four existing lots totaling 10.62 acres and subdivide them into two lots for the purpose of constructing a mixed-use multi-family development with 26 buildings containing a total of 178 residential units (134 townhomes and 44 deed restricted affordable units) and 16 commercial units and 33 optional Accessory Dwelling Units.

The Project includes the development of an internal circulation network of roads, pathways, and vehicle and bicycle parking. Other onsite improvements include a park, swimming pool, open space, play area, lighting, landscaping, and associated infrastructure including water and sewer. Required offsite improvements along the Gravenstein Highway (SR-116) frontage include construction of a multi-use path and site access from SR-116.

Surrounding land uses
and setting; briefly
describe the project’s
surroundings:

The Project site is bounded by Gravenstein Highway (SR-116) to the south, Lowe’s Home Improvement to the north, undeveloped land to the west, a housing development to the northwest, and a restaurant and Redwood Drive to the east. The approximately 10.62-acre Project site is undeveloped, consisting primarily of ruderal vegetation and scattered trees. The site is relatively flat due to mass grading in 2002 in preparation for the Cotati Commons project, previously known as the South Sonoma Business Park (SSBP) project, approved in 2001.
260 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project ii CEQA Analysis
Other public agencies
whose approval is
required:

Caltrans
Sonoma County
Regional Water Quality Control Board
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Have California Native
American tribes
traditionally and
culturally affiliated
with the project area
requested consultation
pursuant to Public
Resources Code section
21080.3.1? If so, has
consultation begun?
The City of Cotati notified California Native American Tribes in accordance with Public Resources Code §21080.3.1. Notice and Cultural Resources Evaluation was sent to the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria on November 15, 2024. A written request for consultation, dated December 3, 2024, was received from the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria. The City met with the Tribe on January 27, 2025 and the tribe requested that canine surveys be conducted on the property.

Canine surveys were conducted on March 5, 2025 and the results of the surveys along with recommended conditions were provided to the Tribe on March 19, 2025. The City sent a follow up message on April 2, 2025 with no response and on April 9, 2025 the City notified the tribe that it considered the consultation satisfied.
261 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project iii CEQA Analysis

REDWOOD ROW PROJECT

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1. OVERVIEW OF CEQA ANALYSIS.............................................................................................................1

1.2. PURPOSE AND SUMMARY OF THIS CEQA DOCUMENT ....................................................................1

1.3. PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS .....................................................................................................................1

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................................. 2

2.1. BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................2

2.2. PROJECT LOCATION...............................................................................................................................2

2.3. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING..............................................................................................................4

2.4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION..........................................................................................................................5

3. RELEVANT CITY PLANNING DOCUMENTS.................................................................................. 17

3.1. CITY OF COTATI GENERAL PLAN ........................................................................................................17

3.2. CITY OF COTATI GENERAL PLAN EIR..................................................................................................17

3.3. CITY OF COTATI ZONING CODE .........................................................................................................18

4. APPLICABLE CEQA PROVISIONS AND FINDINGS....................................................................... 18

4.1. GENERAL PLAN/COMMUNITY PLAN EXEMPTION (CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15183)............19

4.2. APPLICABILITY OF THE PROJECT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15183.....................................19

4.3. CEQA DETERMINATION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ..................................................................21

5. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ............................................................................ 22

5.1. AESTHETICS...........................................................................................................................................24

5.2. AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY RESOURCES ..................................................................................29

5.3. AIR QUALITY..........................................................................................................................................32

5.4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES....................................................................................................................48

5.5. CULTURAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................................................60

5.6. ENERGY .................................................................................................................................................65

5.7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS..........................................................................................................................68

5.8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS..........................................................................................................75

5.9. HAZARDS/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS..................................................................................................81

5.10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ..................................................................................................87

5.11. LAND USE AND PLANNING.................................................................................................................87

5.12. MINERAL RESOURCES .........................................................................................................................97

5.13. NOISE.....................................................................................................................................................98

5.14. POPULATION AND HOUSING.......................................................................................................... 108

5.15. PUBLIC SERVICES .............................................................................................................................. 111

5.16. RECREATION...................................................................................................................................... 115

5.17. TRANSPORTATION............................................................................................................................ 118

5.18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES....................................................................................................... 129

5.19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ................................................................................................... 133

5.20. WILDFIRE............................................................................................................................................ 140

5.21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ................................................................................... 144

6. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS .......................................................................................................... 147

6.1. TECHNICAL APPENDICES ................................................................................................................. 147

6.2. OTHER DOCUMENTS REFERENCED................................................................................................ 147 262 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project iv CEQA Analysis

7. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL...................................................................... 150

TABLE OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1: REGIONAL LOCATION ................................................................................................................ 11 FIGURE 2: PROJECT VICINITY.................................................................................................................... 12 FIGURE 3: ZONING ................................................................................................................................... 13 FIGURE 4: GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ........................................................................................................ 14 FIGURE 5: SITE PLAN ............................................................................................................................... 15 FIGURE 6: LOCATION OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SITE, OFF SITE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS, AND MAXIMUM TAC IMPACTS (MEI)........................................................................................................................ 40 FIGURE 7: PROJECT SITE AND NEARBY TAC AND PM2.5 SOURCES................................................................ 42

TABLE OF TABLES
TABLE 5.1: AIR QUALITY SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS.................................................................................. 35 TABLE 5.2 CONSTRUCTION PERIOD EMISSIONS........................................................................................... 36 TABLE 5.3 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ......................................................................................................... 37 TABLE 5.4: CONSTRUCTION RISK IMPACTS AT THE OFF-SITE PROJECT MEI................................................... 41 TABLE 5.5: CUMULATIVE HEALTH RISK IMPACTS AT THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT MEIS (OFF-SITE) ............ 43 TABLE 5.6: CUMULATIVE HEALTH RISK IMPACTS UPON THE ON-SITE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS .......................... 44 TABLE 5.7: CLIMATE IMPACT THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE (PROJECT LEVEL)............................................. 76 TABLE 5.8: GHG EMISSION FORECASTS .................................................................................................... 77 TABLE 5.9: TYPICAL RANGES OF LEQ CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS AT 50 FEET, DBA................................ 102 TABLE 5.10 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION NOISE BY ACTIVITY...................................................................... 102 TABLE 5.11: EXISTING AND EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ........... 123 TABLE 5.12: BASELINE AND BASELINE PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE.......... 124 TABLE 5.13: FUTURE AND FUTURE PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE............... 124 263 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project v CEQA Analysis

ACRONMYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

APN ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS

BAAQMD BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

BMP BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE

CCR CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS

CDFW CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

CEQA CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

CNEL COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVEL

CNPS CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY

CRHR CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES

CRPUSD COTATI-ROHNERT PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

CTS CALIFORNIA TIGER SALAMANDER
dBA A-WEIGHTED DECIBEL

DMA DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA

DPM DIESEL PARTICULATE MATTER

DPR DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

EIR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

EVA EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS

FIGR FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

GHG GREENHOUSE GAS
gpd GALLONS PER DAY

LID LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT

LWWTP LAGUNA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

MBTA MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT
mph MILES PER HOUR

NPDES NATIONAL POLLUANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM

NAHC NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

NHPA NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT

NRHP NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES

NWIC NORTHWEST INFORMATION CENTER

OEHHA CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARDS ASSESSMENT

PRC PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE

RCPA REGIONAL CLIMATE PROTECTION AGENCY

ROG REACTIVE ORGANIC GAS

RWQCB REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

SCH STATE CLEARINGHOUSE

SMART SONOMA-MARIN AREA RAIL TRANSIT

SR STATE ROUTE

SRPCS SANTA ROSA PLAIN CONSERVATION STRATEGY

SSBP SOUTH SONOMA BUSINESS PARK

SWPPP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN

SWRCB STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD

TCR TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCE

UST UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK

UWMP URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
µG/M
3 MICROGRAMS PER CUBIC METER
264 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project vi CEQA Analysis
[Page Intentionally Left Blank]
265 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 1 of 158 CEQA Analysis

1. INTRODUCTION
This California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Analysis evaluates consistency with the City’s 2013 General Plan EIR to identify any new or more significant impacts from the proposed project, which includes a Vesting Tentative Map for a 10.62 acre parcel, including dedication of parkland and entitlement for Design Review and a Tree Removal Permit to construct 26 buildings (~45 feet tall) containing 178 residential units (134 market-rate townhomes (245,084 sf), 44 affordable apartments(~35,000 sf) and 16 commercial spaces (10,032 square feet), a swimming pool, park, landscaping, lighting, roof-top solar panels, and associated infrastructure improvements (the “Project”).

1.1. OVERVIEW OF CEQA ANALYSIS
This CEQA Analysis has been prepared by the City of Cotati, as the lead agency in full accordance with the procedural and substantive requirements of CEQA, CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Cotati local CEQA provisions.

This CEQA Analysis uses CEQA Guidelines Sections 15183, which provides a streamlined review of the Project by tiering from the program level analysis prepared for the Cotati General Plan and its certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR), thereby focusing the analysis to potential site-specific impacts of the project relative to the impacts analyzed in the program level EIR. Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines mandates that projects which are determined to be consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The analysis provided herein tiers from the program level analysis prepared for the 2013 City of Cotati General Plan and its EIR (SCH No. 2013082037), which was certified in 2015, and for which an addendum was prepared in 2023 with adoption of the City of Cotati 2023-2031 Housing Element. This CEQA Analysis describes the proposed project and its environmental setting, including the project site’s existing conditions and applicable regulatory requirements, and provides an assessment of the project’s consistency with the City of Cotati General Plan. All General Plan policies adopted as mitigation apply to the project as described herein.

1.2. PURPOSE AND SUMMARY OF THIS CEQA DOCUMENT
The purpose of this document is to evaluate environmental effects of the Project under CEQA. This document considers the specific environmental effects of the Project as proposed and whether such impacts were adequately addressed in the City of Cotati 2013 General Plan EIR, as amended. The Project is required to incorporate or comply with all applicable mitigation measures identified in the 2013 General Plan EIR, uniformly applied development standards, and environmental conditions of approval. Section 7 of this document contains environmental conditions of approval imposed on the project to ensure implementation of mitigation measures from the 2013 General Plan EIR which have been identified to avoid, reduce, or offset potential environmental impacts. As presented herein, the Project is consistent with the General Plan and its certified EIR and qualifies for a General Plan Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.

1.3. PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS
The project has been analyzed pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 and does not require circulation for public review and comment. Nonetheless the City will make this CEQA Analysis available as part of the public hearing process, which requires a recommendation from the Planning 266 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 2 of 158 CEQA Analysis
Commission and approval of Tentative Map Approval, Tree Removal Permit, and Design Review by the City Council.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1. BACKGROUND
The Project site is located on the southeastern portion of the South Sonoma Business Park (SSBP), for which the SSBP EIR (SCH#2000052045) was certified and the SSBP Project approved by the City of Cotati on June 13, 2001, and subsequently amended. Following approval of the SSBP Project, grading of the SSBP project site, including the subject Project site occurred in 2002; construction of the Cotati Cottages, a 46 dwelling units residential project immediately north of the subject Project site, and public improvements to Alder Avenue occurred in 2004; and construction of a portion of the Cotati Commons Marketplace, consisting of a 165,382 Lowe’s Home Improvement store, occurred in 2006.

Addendum #2 to the 2001 SSBP EIR was prepared in November 2006 and approved by City Council on June 13, 2007 (Resolution #07-24). Addendum No. 2, included evaluation of SR-116 improvements, including frontage improvements that were completely or partially outside the Caltrans right-of-way adjacent to the Project site (e.g. new public sidewalks along the northern edge of SR-116 from the Redwood Drive intersection to Alder Avenue, including handicap ramps, and installation of pedestrian crosswalks north of SR-116 across the primary entrance driveway and Alder Avenue).

An SB330 preliminary application for the Redwood Row Project was received on May 26, 2022 along with an application for Design Review, an Environmental Assessment, and a Vesting Tentative Map.

The application(s) were deemed incomplete and not approvable based on objective standards.

Several project iterations were submitted after May 26, 2022, but the SB 330 preliminary application expired due to a period of inactivity exceeding six months. A new SB 330 preliminary application was submitted on October 30, 2024, and a final submittal, deemed complete, was received on November 21, 2024. No development has taken place on the subject Project site beyond grading circa 2002. The Project site has since been maintained annually for weed and fire abatement purposes.

Since the SSBP project was originally approved, the City of Cotati updated the General Plan and certified the 2013 General Plan EIR (SCH No. 2013082037) on March 24, 2015. The updated General Plan supersedes the 1998 General Plan under which the 2001 SSBP EIR and subsequent addenda were originally analyzed. The comprehensive update to the General Plan includes policies and programs that apply to the subject Project and infrastructure in the vicinity. Namely, the General Plan calls for the future closure of Alder Avenue from SR-116 and a realignment of West Cotati Avenue coupled with a new signalized intersection to be located at the southwest corner of the Project site at West Coati and SR-116. The proposed Redwood Row Project incorporates circulation requirements of the updated General Plan. The project includes frontage improvements to SR-116 and through conditions of approval, the applicant is required to participate in the City’s Traffic Impact Fee program, which will enable construction of the circulation improvements identified in the General Plan.

2.2. PROJECT LOCATION
The City of Cotati is located in central Sonoma County along the Highway 101 corridor approximately 8 miles south of Santa Rosa and 40 miles north of San Francisco. It is situated in the southern region 267 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 3 of 158 CEQA Analysis
of Sonoma County in a low-lying topographical area known as the Santa Rosa Plain. The City has a population of approximately 7,4301 within approximately 1,217 acres of City-incorporated land.

The Project site is located in the western portion of the City of Cotati, in the County of Sonoma (Figure 1: Regional Location). Specifically, the Project site is located along SR-116 between Redwood Drive and the proposed realignment of West Cotati Avenue. It includes four contiguous parcels (APNs 046- 286-017, -018, 019, and -020).

SR-116, which fronts the subject property to the south, is a California state highway that is maintained by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), connecting US 101 in Cotati to SR 1 on the Sonoma Coast in Jenner. At the project site frontage Gravenstein Highway (SR-116) is a two-lane road with a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour (mph). Redwood Drive, to the east, is a two-lane roadway that runs north-south parallel to Highway 101 to Rohnert Park. Within the project vicinity Redwood Drive is approximately 60 feet wide with a dedicated left-turn lane onto SR-116 and a dedicated right turn lane from SR-116 onto Redwood Drive and has a posted speed limit of 45 mph.

West Cotati Avenue currently terminates at SR-116 immediately south of the Project site. The General Plan anticipated realignment of West Cotati Avenue and SR-116 as buildout would require an improved signalized intersection. A project to re-align West Cotati Avenue to improve vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian safety, signalize the intersection and widen the highway to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian facilities is in the planning phase and undergoing design by the City of Cotati. The implementation of the West Cotati Ave Realignment project is expected to buildout incrementally as vacant/underutilized parcels along SR-116 are developed and when the City secures funding to install improvements. A consistency analysis under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (SCH# 2024090793) was completed for the project and a Notice of Exemption was filed on September 19, 2025.

The Project site is comprised of four contiguous parcels that occupy approximately 10.62 acres. The Project site is vacant and undeveloped, consisting primarily of ruderal vegetation and scattered trees.

The site is relatively flat due to mass grading in 2002 in preparation for the Cotati Commons project, previously known as the South Sonoma Business Park (SSBP) project, approved in 2001.

As seen in Figure 2: Project Vicinity, the Project site is bounded by SR-116 to the south, Lowe’s Home Improvement to the north, a restaurant and Redwood Drive to the east, and an undeveloped parcel to the east (future site of the Cotati Village 1 project). Existing land uses include commercial development to the north, east, and southeast and the Cotati Cottages residential townhouse development to the northwest. Two mixed use multi-family developments have been approved on the two parcels immediately west of the project site. Cotati Village 1, adjacent to the project site, is approved for 177 units and Cotati Village 2, on the western side of Alder Avenue, is approved for 126 units. An undeveloped parcel is located across SR-116 south of the project site.

The Project site is located approximately 1.5 miles west of the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) Cotati station and the SMART corridor, approximately 0.75 miles from the Cotati Hub bus station, and the nearest bus stop for bus route 26 operated by Sonoma County Transit is located at SR-116 and Redwood Drive. An additional bus stop is located approximately 0.4 miles from the Project site at the intersection of Old Redwood Highway and St. Joseph Way and is served by Sonoma County Transit Bus Routes 10 and 48 and Golden Gate Transit Bus Route 101 NB/SB. The Project site is bounded by SR-116 to the south and access to Highway 101 is located less than 0.25 miles east of the Project site. 1 US Census Bureau, City of Cotati, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/cotaticitycalifornia, 2023 Estimate, accessed April 2, 2025. 268 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 4 of 158 CEQA Analysis
The Redwood Row project site is one portion of the former, fully mitigated and permitted South Sonoma Business Park (SSBP) project site which was approximately 34 acres. To obtain the state and federal resource agency permits and the City grading permit, the SSBP applicant purchased all necessary mitigation bank credits and mitigation property as required for the SSBP project’s proposed impact on the state and federally listed Sebastopol meadowfoam (Limnanthes vinculans) and the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is now in control (owner) of those mitigation properties. Subsequent to the SSBP mass grading in 2002, portions of the SSBP project site were fully developed (i.e., Cotati Cottages and Lowe’s) and other portions, including the Redwood Row project site, were only graded and the wetlands filled with imported clean dirt, but the site was not developed.

Development of the Redwood Row site was initiated in June 2002 with an approved stockpile and drainage plan which allowed placement of approximately 10,000 cubic yards of clean fill on the site in accordance with the City’s approved stockpile and drainage plan (permit numbers 25090, 25154, 25027) and the creation of drainage swales on the property, but the site was not fully developed at that time due to delays from the anticipated CalTrans Highway 116 expansion and then due to the 2008 Great Recession. Although the site has not been built out, it has been actively managed over the past 20+ years to facilitate site drainage and for fire control; annual disking and mowing have been part of the management regime. Additionally, the landowner has been paying annually into the SSBP Assessment District which was established to finance all resource agency required mitigation.

Due to mass grading of the project site in 2002 and the annual maintenance (disking) of the project site since then, there are only two remaining plant communities onsite: ruderal herbaceous, and seasonal/constructed wetlands.

Almost all vegetation within the project site consists of non-native, ruderal herbaceous grasses and forbs (i.e., broad-leaved plants) though there are several valley oak trees (Quercus lobata) lining the southeastern border, with a eucalyptus tree and a prominent mature valley oak standing in the middle of the site. Dominant vegetation includes wild oat (Avena barbata), Italian ryegrass (Festuca perennis), Mediterranean barley (Hordeum marinum gussoneanum), and bur medic (Medicago polymorpha).

A total of roughly 0.27 acre of seasonal wetlands (five seasonal swales) were created on the Redwood Row project site. These five seasonal wetlands are artificial ditches related to interim construction measures and upland drainage maintenance of the property that has been ongoing since 2002. These features were created to provide drainage on the project site and reduce ponding related to the previous mass grading and stockpiling of the project site.

2.3. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
The City of Cotati General Plan identifies the City’s vision for the future and provides a framework that will guide decisions on growth, development, and conservation of open space and resources in a manner consistent with the quality of life desired by the City’s residents and businesses. To ensure that this desired vision is realized, the General Plan has been designed to be internally consistent and cross-referenced with other documents, including the City’s Land Use Code.

The City of Cotati Land Use Code implements the General Plan. Several different zoning districts are identified in the Land Use Code that are intended to, among other things, provide for a wide range of uses and implement the City’s vision to conserve open space and resources. The project site is zoned Commercial, Gravenstein Corridor (CG) per the City of Cotati Zoning Map (Figure 3: Zoning). 269 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 5 of 158 CEQA Analysis
The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC) (Figure 4:

General Plan Land Use). The surrounding land uses are designated General Commercial to the north, south, east, and west, and Medium Density Residential (MDR) to the northwest.

2.4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Project is comprised of a mixed-use development consisting of 26 buildings containing 134 townhome-styled condominiums, 33 optional accessory dwelling units (ADUS), 44 affordable apartments, 10,032 square feet of gross commercial floor area, a pool/community building, pool and pool deck, frontage improvements, vehicle and bicycle circulation and parking, playground, landscaping, lighting, and ancillary improvements.

The townhomes will be three-bedroom units with an optional 4th bedroom/ADU and will range in size from 1,765 sf to 2,183 sf of floor area. Units will have individual garages ranging in size from 496 sf to 565 sf. The 44 affordable housing units (apartments) will have one, two, or three bedrooms and range in size from 550 square feet to 1,150 square feet and will all be located in one structure. Commercial spaces (10,032 sf) will be located on the ground floor of Building A and Building B.

A community pool, play area, and open space are proposed for the center of the site and a triangular shaped park, which will include a large and small dog park are proposed along the western boundary of the project site to the south of the existing park associated with the Cotati Cottages. (Figure 5: Site Plan). The Project has been submitted to the City of Cotati subject to the provisions of SB 330, vesting ordinances, fees, polices, and standards applicable to the project and in effect on October 30, 2024.

Proposed Structures and Improvements
The proposed Project site plan, architecture, preliminary improvement plans, and landscaping plans include the following:

Mixed-Use Buildings
Buildings A and B will be a total of three stories with a maximum height of 44 feet. The ground floor of the building will have garages and “front” doors that lead to the townhomes’ primary living space which will be located on the second and third floors. Sixteen commercial spaces ranging in size from 585 square feet to 753 square feet, will be located on the ground floor of the south-facing side of both buildings. The commercial units will face SR-116 and be accessible from the proposed multi-use path that will run along the property frontage. Building A will contain nine residential units and Building B will contain seven residential units.

Townhomes
Buildings C through Building CC will be arranged around the central open space of the project site.

Most townhome buildings will hold six units though some will hold as few as three units and Building U will have 8 units. Each townhome building will be three stories tall and an estimated 39 feet in height. There will be a total of 118 units located within the 23 residential townhouse-styled condominium structures. The buildings are arranged so that there is a pedestrian/front entrance located on the side of the building facing toward pedestrian/open space areas. Each will have a front yard with a low fence. Each unit has a proposed garage that is oriented toward the vehicle circulation areas.

Apartment Building
270 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 6 of 158 CEQA Analysis
The affordable housing units will be located within a single three-story apartment building located on the eastern portion of the project site. The apartment building structure has a maximum proposed height of 39 feet and covers approximately 16,000 square feet. The primary entrance will be located from the west side of the building accessed from an internal pedestrian foot/bike path that will connect with the multi-use path along SR-116. An additional entrance is proposed on the north side of the building from the parking associated parking lot.

Architecture
The buildings are planned to be founded on a post-tensioned foundation system. The architectural design for the Redwood Row buildings would incorporate contemporary craftsman style elements. All buildings would be three stories in height with pitched roofs and variations in roof line. Each building includes variation in the façade with pop-outs or step backs. Articulation is proposed via variation in exterior materials which would include hardi-board and batt siding, stucco finishes, and Hardi horizontal siding, and brick and stone veneer, as well as single hung windows, brackets, and horizontal railings. Commercial spaces in Buildings A and C will have large glazed storefront windows and shopfront doors. Roofing materials include composition shingle roofing.

Offsite Improvements
Proposed frontage improvements include construction of two new vehicular entrances and an emergency vehicle access road to the property from SR-116 into the development and construction of a 14-foot-wide paved multi-use path along SR-116 frontage. The site frontage improvements planned as part of the Project are consistent with and would tie into the City’s proposed West Cotati Avenue intersection and facility improvement along SR-116.

Access and Parking
The Project site is planned to have access from SR-116. The site will be accessed from a 26-foot-wide driveway that will enter the development between buildings A and B. Two additional Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) points are proposed, one from the Lowe’s parking lot and one located at the property’s southeastern corner from SR-116. An additional public access will be located west of Building B adjacent to the property line.

The project would have a network of roads and driveways which will provide for internal circulation and access to 268 parking spaces for the townhouses (located within individual garages), 57 parking spaces for the apartments, 34 guest parking spaces, and 41 commercial parking spaces.

Pedestrian access would be accommodated throughout the site via a new shared pedestrian and bicycle path proposed along the SR-116 frontage and proposed internal walkways along the roadways within the site, and around the residential buildings and community spaces.

Landscaping and Lighting
The Landscape Site Plan proposes a mix of trees, shrubs, groundcover, grasses, and vines. Trees and other landscaping are proposed along the perimeter of the project site, throughout the parking lot, between buildings, and within public open spaces.

The landscaping plan includes the preservation of the prominent existing oak tree located in the center and the oaks along the southeast corner of the site. Landscaping would feature drought tolerant plants and a high efficiency irrigation system, including weather-based controllers. Landscape areas would establish buffers, provide shading, and serve as biofiltration and stormwater detention 271 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 7 of 158 CEQA Analysis
facilities. A landscaping strip would provide for tree planting along the southern property line fronting SR-116.

The Project will be required by standard conditions of approval to comply with outdoor lighting standards as provided in the City of Cotati Land Use Code Section 17.30.060.

Water Supply
Potable water would be accommodated via the installation of new water laterals within the development that would connect the new buildings to the existing water main within SR-116. Fire hydrants in compliance with the California Fire Code will be installed throughout the project site to be served by new water connections.

Wastewater
Wastewater would be accommodated via the installation of a new sanitary sewer lateral that would connect to an existing sanitary sewer line located at the north of the property. The new sanitary sewer lines would collect wastewater generated onsite and convey flows through the existing sanitary sewer system to the existing wastewater processing plant for treatment.

Solid Waste
Each garage will provide sufficient space to accommodate three household sized waste bins (trash, recycling, compost). A trash room is proposed on the ground floor at the northeast corner of both Building A and Building B to accommodate waste, recycling, and compost from the commercial units.

A trash enclosure is proposed for the northeast corner of the parking lot that would serve the apartment building and will accommodate all three refuse streams.

Storm Drainage Infrastructure
Storm drains would be utilized throughout the project site to direct stormwater from impervious areas to landscape areas, bioretention areas, and other vegetated bio-retention features consistent with the requirements of Low Impact Development throughout the site. Fourteen drainage management areas (DMAs) are proposed to contain and treat stormwater flows throughout the site.

Site Preparation and Construction
For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that site preparation and construction would occur between January 2025 and July 2026. Site preparation would initiate with the removal of vegetation and trees. The applicant proposes to remove one eucalyptus tree, however, it is likely that through construction, the oak trees along the SR-116 frontage will also be removed and are included in the tree removal permit.

Grading would occur to achieve proposed site elevations. Preliminary grading plans indicate approximately 18,000 cubic yards of net fill to the site. Following completion of grading activities, infrastructure improvements and building foundations would be constructed. Foundations are proposed to be slab-on-grade. Utilities, storm drains and catch basins would be installed and buildings erected. New driveways, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, striping, landscaping, lighting, and signage would be installed.

Construction equipment expected to be utilized during site preparation and grading includes tractors, backhoes, haul trucks, graders, pavers, forklifts, and water trucks. All material and equipment would be staged on-site or, through issuance of an encroachment permit, at abutting rights-of-way. 272 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 8 of 158 CEQA Analysis
Density Bonus
The Project applies the provisions of State Density Bonus Law (Government Code 65915) to provide units on site above the base maximum residential density. The base density of the Commercial, Gravenstein Corridor (CG) zone is 15 residential units per acre, which allows for 159 residential units at the Project site. Through the application of the Density Bonus, the project will construct 178 units, not including the 33 optional Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), which are not factored into density or density bonus calculations per state law.

The project is also eligible for waivers and concessions that will be applied to the location of inclusionary units, the maximum building height, accessibility requirements for multifamily projects, Minimum FAR for nonresidential use, and setbacks.

Project Objectives
The project objectives are identified as the following:
• Provide for a mix of residential and commercial uses. • Propose development in CG that meets the minimum density requirements. • Provide housing to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). • Provide affordable units to assist in meeting the City’s housing needs. • Propose development on an infill, underutilized, or vacant parcel designated for urban uses within city limits.
• Propose infill development that can connect to existing utility infrastructure.

Required Discretionary Actions
The applicant is requesting approval of Design Review, a Tree Removal Permit, parkland dedication, and a Vesting Tentative Map to construct a mixed-use development, which consists of 26 buildings that will accommodate up to 211 residential units (including the 33 optional ADUs) and 10,000 square feet of commercial space. The Project applicant has applied to the City of Cotati for the following entitlements:
• Design Review
• Tree Removal Permit
• Vesting Tentative Tract Map (includes parkland dedication) In addition, the Project will be required to obtain all ministerial permits from the City as required to construct the Project, e.g., building permits, grading permits, occupancy permits, etc. following approval of entitlement applications.

Other Public Agency Review
In addition to the approval necessary from the City of Cotati as the lead agency, the Redwood Row Project may require the following approvals from agencies other than the City:
• Sonoma Water (formerly Sonoma County Water Agency) – For review, approval and acceptance of the Project’s Stormwater Management Plan
• Caltrans Encroachment Permit
• Regional Water Quality Control Board
• California Department of Fish and Wildlife
273 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 9 of 158 CEQA Analysis
California Native American Tribal Consultation
In accordance with Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21084.2, lead agencies are required to consider Tribal Cultural Resources (TCR) including a site feature, place, cultural landscape, sacred place or object of cultural value to the tribe and is listed on the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) or a local register, or the lead agency, at its discretion, chooses to treat resources as such. In accordance with PRC Section 21080.3.1(b)(1), the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria (FIGR), in a letter dated July 2015, stated that its tribe was traditionally and culturally affiliated with a geographic area within the City of Cotati’s geographic area of jurisdiction, and requested formal notice of and information on projects for which the City of Cotati serves as a lead agency under CEQA.

In accordance with PRC Section 21080.3.1(d), the City of Cotati provided written formal notification to the FIGR on November 15, 2024, which included a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the City of Cotati’s contact information, the Cultural Resource Evaluation, and a notification that the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section.

The City of Cotati received a response requesting consultation under PRC Section 21080.3.1(b)(2) from the FIGR on December 3, 2024. The City of Cotati entered into consultation with FIGR and provided the requested information on December 5, 2024. A meeting between the City of Cotati and FIGR resulted in a request from the Tribe to conduct additional pre-approval analysis of the site including subsurface testing and canine surveys. Canine Surveys were completed on March 5, 2025 and the results of the surveys, the updated analysis, along with updated Conditions of Approval were provided to FIGR on March 19, 2025, and the City requested a meeting to continue the consultation. No response was received. A follow up email was sent by the City to the Tribe on April 2, with no response.

On April 9, 2025 and the City notified the tribe that the City considered the tribal consultation satisfied. 274 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 10 of 158 CEQA Analysis
[Page Intentionally Left Blank]
275 of 539
Cotati
Sonoma County
Cotati
Project Site
Gravenstein Highway
Highway 101
Alder Ave.

W. Cotati Ave.

Redwood Dr.

Locust Ave.

INSERT SCALE AND NORTH ARROW

IF NOT IMPORTED
Figure 1: Regional Location
Redwood Row | Cotati, CA
Project Site City Limits 276 of 539
Data source: City of Cotati GIS, County of Sonoma GIS

PROJECT SITE
CITY OF COTATI / SONOMA COUNTY BOUNDARY 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Miles COTATI
VILLAGE 1
COTATI
VILLAGE 2

PROJECT SITE
Redwood Row | Cotati CA
SR-116
Alder Ave
Redwood Drive
HWY 101
Old Redwood Highway
W. Cotati Ave.

Figure 2: Project Vicinty 277 of 539
oL
r
101 YWH SU
STATE RTE 116

GRAVENSTEIN HWY

ALDER AVE

HELMAN LN

REDWOOD DR

WILFORD LN

DVLB ECREMMOC

ALMA AVE

OLD REDWOOD HWY

W COTATI AVE

ST JOSEPH WAY

GILMAN RANCH RD

SOUTHWEST BLVD
101 YWH SU
Redwood Row
Data source: City of Cotati GIS, County of Sonoma GIS

PROJECT SITE

CITY OF COTATI / SONOMA COUNTY BOUNDARY

ZONING DESIGNATION

COMMERCIAL, GRAVENSTEIN CORRIDOR (CG)

COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (CI)

NEIGHBORHOOD, LOW DENSITY (NL)

NEIGHBORHOOD, MEDIUM DENSITY (NM)

NEIGHBORHOOD, URBAN (NU)

OPEN SPACE - RECREATION (OSR)

PUBLIC FACILITY DISTRICT (PF)

RURAL RESIDENTIAL (RR)

RESIDENTIAL VERY LOW DENSITY (RVL)

SPECIFIC PLAN, DOWNTOWN (SPD)
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Miles
Figure 3: Zoning
|Cotati, CA
Project Site
278 of 539
US HWY 101
STATE RTE 116

GRAVENSTEIN HWY

ALDER AVE

HELMAN LN

REDWOOD DR

COMMERCE BLVD

ALMA AVE

OLD REDWOOD HWY

W COTATI AVE

ST JOSEPH WAY

GILMAN RANCH RD
US HWY 101
Data source: City of Cotati GIS, County of Sonoma GIS

PROJECT SITE

CITY OF COTATI / SONOMA COUNTY BOUNDARY

LAND USE DESIGNATION

AGRICULTURE (A)

COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL (CI)

GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR)

LOW/MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LMDR)

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR)

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HDR)

OPEN SPACE/PARKS (OSP)

RURAL RESIDENTIAL (RR)

SPECIFIC PLAN (SP)
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Miles

Redwood Row | Cotati, CA
Project Site
Figure 4: General Plan Land Use Map 279 of 539
Gravenstein Highway
Highway 101 Alder Ave.

W. Cotati Ave. Redwood Dr.

Figure 5: Site Plan
Redwood Row | Cotati, CA
280 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 16 of 158 CEQA Analysis
[PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
281 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 17 of 158 CEQA Analysis

3. RELEVANT CITY PLANNING DOCUMENTS

3.1. CITY OF COTATI GENERAL PLAN
The 2013 City of Cotati General Plan was adopted in 2015 and identifies the City’s vision for the future and provides a framework that will guide decisions on growth, development, and conservation of open space and resources in a manner consistent with the quality of life desired by the City’s residents and businesses. To ensure that this desired vision is realized, the General Plan has been designed to be internally consistent and cross-referenced with other documents, including the City’s Land Use Code. The Cotati General Plan was adopted by City Council on March 24, 2015 by Resolution Number 2015-12.

The Cotati General Plan is intended for a broad range of applications, including:
• Informing discretionary activities carried out by City Council and Planning Commission; • Program and project development and implementation carried out by City staff; • Preparation of project proposals by the development community; and • Facilitation of public understanding of future development in Cotati and the City’s vision, goals, and priorities.

A copy of the City of Cotati’s General Plan is available at the Community Development Department, 201 West Sierra Avenue, Cotati, California 94931, during normal business hours and online at http://cotaticity.org/.

3.2. CITY OF COTATI GENERAL PLAN EIR
The City of Cotati 2013 General Plan EIR (SCH No. 2013082037) was certified on March 24, 2015 by Resolution Number 2015-11 and for which an addendum was prepared for the 2023-2031 Housing Element in 2023. The 2013 General Plan EIR analyzed the following environmental resource topics:
aesthetics and visual resources; air quality; biological resources; cultural resources; geology and soils; greenhouse gases and climate change; hazards; hydrology and water quality; land use, agriculture, and population; noise; public services and recreation; transportation and circulation; and utilities. The EIR analyzed two buildout scenarios. One evaluated maximum projected development within the City Limits, and the other evaluated the maximum projected development that could occur within the existing City Limits and the City’s Sphere of Influence.

The 2013 General Plan EIR reviewed potentially significant environmental effects resulting from plan implementation and developed measures and policies to mitigate impacts to less-than-significant levels. Nonetheless, significant and unavoidable impacts were determined to occur under the General Plan. Therefore, the City adopted a statement of overriding considerations, which balance the merits of approving the plan despite the significant environmental effects. The effects identified as significant and unavoidable in the 2013 General Plan EIR include:

Aesthetics
• Impact 3.1-1: Substantial Adverse Effects on Visual Character, including Scenic Vistas or Scenic Resources.
• Impact 4.1: Cumulative Degradation of the Existing Visual Character of the Region Noise
282 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 18 of 158 CEQA Analysis
• Impact 3.10-1: Traffic Noise Sources.
• Impact 3.10-7: Cumulative Noise Impacts
• Impact 4.11: Cumulative Exposure of Noise-Sensitive Land Uses to Noise in Excess of Normally Acceptable Noise Levels or to Substantial Increases in Noise.

Traffic
• Impact 3.12-1: Acceptable traffic operation at the study intersections and roadway segments controlled by the City of Cotati, though the ability to fully fund all identified improvements is uncertain.
• Impact 3.12-2: Acceptable traffic operation on Gravenstein Highway, though the funding and timing of improvements needed to accommodate regional and local growth on the highway is uncertain.
• Impact 3.12-3: Unacceptable operation on US 101 freeway facilities. • Impact 4.13: Cumulative Impact on the Transportation Network.

Utilities
• Impact 3.13-3: Potential to exceed wastewater treatment capacity or the requirements of the RWQCB.
• Impact 4.14: Cumulative Impact on Utilities.

Other
• Impact 4.15: Irreversible Effects (Consumption of Nonrenewable Resources, Irretrievable Commitments, Irreversible Physical Changes).

The Draft EIR for the Cotati General Plan (SCH No. 2013082037) was prepared in September 2014. The Draft EIR, together with the Response to Comments Document dated November 2014, constitute the Final EIR for the Cotati General Plan. A copy of the City of Cotati’s 2013 General Plan EIR is available at the Community Development Department, 201 West Sierra Avenue, Cotati, California 94931, during normal business hours and online at www.cotaticity.org.

3.3. CITY OF COTATI ZONING CODE
The City of Cotati Land Use Code implements the goals and policies of the Cotati General Plan by classifying and regulating the uses of land and structures within the City of Cotati. In addition, the Land Use Code is adopted to protect and promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of residents, and preserve and enhance the aesthetic quality of the city. The Land Use Code is provided within Title 17 (Land Use) of the City of Cotati Municipal Code.

The Project site is zoned Commercial, Gravenstein Corridor (CG), which permits a maximum residential density of 159 units at the Project site (15 units per acre). Through the application of the Density Bonus, the 178 proposed units (not including the 33 ADUs) complies with the City’s Zoning Code. The 33 optional ADUs comply with the City’s Zoning Code and State ADU law.

4. APPLICABLE CEQA PROVISIONS AND FINDINGS
The following discussion presents the relevant provisions of CEQA with which the proposed project complies. It provides an overview of the Community Plan Exemption. A description of how the project 283 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 19 of 158 CEQA Analysis
complies with each provision is also provided. Finally, this section concludes with the CEQA finding and determination that the project is exempt from further environmental review.

4.1. GENERAL PLAN/COMMUNITY PLAN EXEMPTION (CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15183) California Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the densities established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified.

Section 15183 (a) “mandates that projects which are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. This streamlines the review of such projects and reduces the need to prepare repetitive environmental studies.”
Section 15183(b) of the CEQA Guidelines specifies that “in approving a project meeting the requirements of Section 15183, examination of environmental effects:

As prescribed in Section 15183(b), a public agency shall limit its examination of environmental effects to those which the agency determines, in an initial study or other analysis:

1. Are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located,

2. Were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, general plan or community plan with which the project is consistent,

3. Are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning action, or

4. Are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.

Section 15183(c) specifies that impacts which are not peculiar to the project site which have been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR or can be substantially mitigated by applying uniformly applied development standards and policies shall not require preparation of an additional EIR on the basis of that impact. As such, the project is required to implement all applicable mitigation measures set forth in the 2013 General Plan EIR to avoid, reduce, or offset environmental impacts. Section 7 of this CEQA Analysis identifies the relevant conditions of approval that will be required of the proposed project to demonstrate compliance with mitigation measures set forth in the program level EIR, and policies, programs and goals of the General Plan.

4.2. APPLICABILITY OF THE PROJECT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15183 Section 15183(d) of the CEQA Guidelines states that streamlining provisions of this section apply to projects that meet the following criteria: (1) the project is consistent with (a) a community plan adopted as part of a general plan, (b) a zoning action which zoned or designated the parcel on which the project would be located to accommodate a particular density of development, or (c) a general plan of a local agency, and (2) an EIR was certified by the lead agency for the zoning action, the community plan, or the general plan. The proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan land 284 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 20 of 158 CEQA Analysis
use designation and zoning for the site, and meets the streamlining provisions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(d)(1) as follows:

The Project site is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC) and zoning district of Commercial, Gravenstein Corridor (CG) for the site. The GC land use designation is intended to provide for basic business and service needs of the local community, including shopping centers, neighborhood-oriented retail, and highway-oriented commercial uses. Office and multifamily residential land uses which are easily integrated into the adjacent districts are also appropriate.

Base densities allow for 15 dwelling units per acre, with 80 percent site coverage. The CG zoning designation implements the GC land use designation of the General Plan. CG is a mixed-use designation that allows for a wide range of retail and service land uses that serve both the local population and regional markets, and for residential uses as part of mixed-use projects. The Project proposes ground floor commercial spaces and multifamily residential units consistent with the allowable uses under the General Plan and zoning designations.

The Project proposes the development of base units in line with the standard of 15 dwelling units per acre and qualifies the Project for the addition of density bonus units as allowed by State law under Government Code Section 65915. The proposed development is consistent with the overall projected development in the City of Cotati General Plan and 2013 General Plan EIR, as amended, which assumed build out would result in approximately 1,431 new housing units and 2.39 million square feet of industrial, commercial, public facility, and other non-residential uses within the city limits.

The Project is consistent with General Plan policies, including the following:
• Policy LU 1.4: Require new development to occur in a logical and orderly manner, focusing growth on infill locations and areas designated for urbanization on the Land Use Map (see Figure 7.1), and be subject to the ability to provide urban services, including paying for any needed extension of services.
• Action LU 1c: Prioritize the processing of development applications for infill, underutilized, or vacant parcels designated for urban uses over those projects requiring annexation. • Policy LU 2.11: Continue to mix residential and commercial uses in appropriate areas, with an emphasis on providing mixed uses in the areas with Specific Plan land use designations. • Policy LU 3.2: Encourage infill development of vacant lots within existing commercial districts and the core downtown/business areas and prioritize such development. • Policy H-2.1: Ensure that adequate land designated for residential and/or mixed-use development is available to accommodate the City’s fair share of ABAG’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and monitor on an annual basis to ensure continual compliance with State law. • Policy H-2.2: Continue to require that residential development in the NU, NM, CG, and DSP zones meet the minimum density requirements identified in the Land Use Code, and report requests for reduced density on an annual basis.
• Policy H-2.7: Require housing developments to provide housing units at a range of affordability levels to assist in meeting the City’s housing needs as required by Chapter 17.31 of the Land Use Code.
• Policy H-2.11: Encourage housing development on existing infill sites in order to efficiently utilize existing infrastructure.
• Policy H-3-2: Provide incentives for discretionary affordable housing development that address community priorities, including density bonuses, expedited processing, relaxation in development 285 of 539
286 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 22 of 158 CEQA Analysis

5. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
This section examines the Project’s potential environmental effects within the parameters outlined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(b). The “Prior EIR” (as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(b)(3), is the City of Cotati 2013 General Plan EIR, inclusive of all impact determinations, significance thresholds and mitigation measures identified therein.

This evaluation builds from the Appendix G Environmental Checklist and has been modified to reflect the parameters outlined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(b). The checkboxes in the evaluation below indicate whether the proposed project would result in environmental impacts, as follows:
• New Significant Impact – The proposed project would result in a new significant impact that was not previously identified in the General Plan EIR.
• Substantial Increase in Severity of Previously Identified Significant Impact in General Plan EIR – The proposed project’s specific impact would be substantially greater than the specific impact described in the General Plan EIR.
• Substantial Change Relative to General Plan EIR – The proposed Project would involve a substantial change from analysis conducted in the General Plan EIR. • Equal or Less Severity of Impact than Previously Identified in General Plan EIR – The severity of the specific impact of the proposed project would be the same as or less than the severity of the specific impact described in the General Plan EIR.

Where the severity of the impacts of the proposed project would be the same as or less than the severity of the impacts described in the General Plan EIR, the checkbox for “Equal or Less Severity of Impact Previously Identified in GP EIR” is checked. Where the checkbox for “Substantial Increase in Severity of Previously Identified Significant Impact in GP EIR” or “New Significant Impact” is checked, there are significant impacts that are:
• Peculiar to the project or project site (CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(b)(3)); • Not analyzed as significant impacts in the previous EIRs, including off-site and cumulative impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(b)(2));
• Due to substantial changes in the project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(1)); • Due to substantial changes in circumstances under which the project will be undertaken (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(2)); or
• Due to substantial new information not known at the time the EIRs were certified (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162(a)(3) and 15183(b)(4)).

Following the Checklist, a summary of the potential environmental impacts relevant to the proposed project that may result from the General Plan, as evaluated in the 2013 General Plan EIR, are described. Next, the potential project-specific environmental effects of the proposed project, including the project’s consistency with the 2013 General Plan EIR, are discussed. Last, applicable General Plan EIR mitigation measures, as well as General Plan Objectives, Policies and Programs, are identified. 287 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 23 of 158 CEQA Analysis
As described herein, the proposed project will be required to comply with all applicable mitigation measures and policies identified in the Cotati 2013 General Plan EIR.

This evaluation hereby incorporates by reference the 2013 General Plan EIR discussion and analysis of all environmental topics. The 2013 General Plan EIR significance thresholds have been consolidated and abbreviated in this Checklist; a complete list of the significance thresholds can be found in the 2013 General Plan EIR.

The 2013 General Plan EIR is a program level document that consider the combined effects of implementing several related projects. As such, the analyses presented in the 2013 General Plan EIR represent a cumulative analysis of environmental impacts that may occur from buildout of the General Plan.
288 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 24 of 158 CEQA Analysis

5.1. AESTHETICS
Except as provided in Public Resources
Code Section 21099, would the Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
More
Severe
Impact
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
No
Substantial
Change
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
No Change
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing
visual character or quality of public views
of the site and its surroundings? (Public
views are those that are experienced
from publicly accessible vantage points.)
If the project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with applicable
zoning and other regulations governing
scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light
or glare which would adversely affect day
or nighttime views in the area?
Sources: Redwood Row Project Plans dated November 11, 2024; Cotati General Plan and 2013 General Plan EIR adopted and certified on March 24, 2015; California Scenic Highway Mapping System Map updated Feb 16, 2021; Public Works/Engineering Conditions of Approval prepared on March 11, 2025; and City of Cotati Municipal Code. 2013 General Plan EIR Findings
The City of Cotati 2013 General Plan EIR identifies visual and scenic resources throughout the City including scenic highways and corridors, natural scenic resources such as rivers, wildlife area, and prominent visual features in the Cotati Planning Area.

The 2013 General Plan EIR concludes that, with implementation of General Plan policies, impacts to the visual character, visual quality and views to the Sonoma Mountains, and resources along the City’s scenic roadways would be significant and unavoidable. The following impacts to aesthetics were considered under the 2013 General Plan EIR:
• Impact 3.1-1: General Plan Implementation could result in Substantial Adverse Effects on Visual Character, including Scenic Vistas or Scenic Resources. General Plan Policies LU 1.4, LU

1.6, LU 1.8, LU 2.1, LU 2.2, LU 3.2, OS 1.1 - OS 1.15, CON 1.15 - CON 1.20 and Actions LU 1c, LU 1d, LU 2b, LU 2c, OS 1a – OS 1g, and CON 1l were identified as mitigating policies. However, 289 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 25 of 158 CEQA Analysis
despite these measures, implementation of the General Plan would have a significant and unavoidable impact.
• Impact 3.1-2: General Plan Implementation could result in the Creation of New Sources of Nighttime Lighting and Daytime Glare. This impact is considered less than significant. Through the implementation of mitigating General Plan Policy OS 1.13 and Action OS 1f, implementation of the General Plan would have a less than significant impact. • The City of Cotati adopted the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations on March 24, 2015, including for the significant and unavoidable impacts identified for Aesthetics and Visual Resources (Impact 3.1-1). The City findings determined that despite the significant and unavoidable impact to aesthetic resources, no other project alternative would meet the City’s objective to realize the development potential of undeveloped lands for residential, office, and commercial uses necessary for housing opportunity and job growth.

The City of Cotati 2013 General Plan EIR identifies significant visual resources in the Planning Area including views of the Sonoma Mountains, expansive views of agricultural lands, wildlife habitat areas, the Laguna de Santa Rosa, and various creek corridors. These resources can be viewed from public vantage points, including highways, open roads, open space areas, and private residences throughout the Planning Area. The EIR identified Policies LU 1.4, LU 1.6, LU 1.8 which address visual resources associated with the location of new development, preservation of rural areas, and the urban growth boundary. General Plan policies LU 2.1, LU 2.2, and LU 3.2 address site design, OS 1.1 -OS 1.20 address preservation of open space, scenic views, and rural lands and CON1.15-1.19 address preservation of ridgelines, hillsides, and slopes.

The 2013 General Plan Final EIR (FEIR) determined that the implementation of the General Plan could result in substantial adverse effects on visual character, including impacts to scenic vistas or scenic resources and no feasible mitigation measures were available. The findings of the FEIR determined that there were mitigating policies included in the 2013 General Plan that would lessen the impacts, but that they would not reduce the impacts to less than significant. The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations Finding that the benefits of the General Plan outweigh the significant and unavoidable impacts to aesthetic resources.

Project Consistency with the 2013 General Plan EIR

5.1(a)(c) (Scenic Vistas and Visual Character) – No Change Relative to the General Plan FEIR The 2013 General Plan EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan would result in significant and unavoidable impacts on scenic vistas or scenic resources and a statement of overriding consideration was adopted with the 2013 General Plan FEIR. The FEIR determined that while the city does not have officially designated scenic vista points, the city contains numerous areas and viewsheds with relatively high scenic value. Identified significant visual resources, including views of the Sonoma Mountains, Laguna de Santa Rosa, agricultural lands, wildlife habitat areas, and creek corridors, all of which could be viewed from public vantage points throughout the city.

While the General Plan establishes policies and actions that are designed to reduce the impact on scenic quality and visual character, the Statement of Overriding Consideration acknowledged that the only method to completely avoid impacts on a citywide basis would be to severely limit the development potential of undeveloped lands that could support job growth and provision of housing 290 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 26 of 158 CEQA Analysis
options. This was determined not to be consistent with the objectives of the 2013 General Plan to support a range of high-quality housing options and expand economic development and jobsgenerating uses in the city. Therefore, the visual impact of implementing the General Plan was determined to be significant and unavoidable.

The Statements of Overriding Considerations adopted by the City recognized that the change in scenic resources and visual character from General Plan buildout would be unavoidable. Per the Statements of Overriding Considerations, “The introduction of new development into previously undisturbed areas may result in potentially significant impacts to scenic resources or result in the degradation of the Planning Area’s visual character. Additionally, new development may result in changes to the skyline throughout the Planning Area, which may obstruct or interfere with views of the surrounding hillsides and the surrounding foothill areas.“2Future projects developed under the General Plan would be required to be consistent with General Plan policies and actions, which aim to reduce visual impacts. However, the Statement of Overriding Considerations determined that “no feasible mitigation is available to fully reduce the cumulative effect on visual character, or to mitigate the proposed projects contribution to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, the proposed General Plan’s contribution to this impact is considerable and the impact is significant and unavoidable.” The subject Project proposes development consistent with the General Plan land use designation, General Plan policies and actions, and development standards applicable to the site. The project proposes the development of 26 buildings containing 178 town homes with the potential for up to 33 ADUS, 44 affordable apartments, 10,032 square feet of gross commercial floor area on a site designated to accommodate such uses, as planned for by the General Plan and allowed in accordance with the State Density Bonus Law. The Project has been determined to be consistent with applicable policies of the General Plan and waiver/concessions provided through the State Density Bonus law, including development standards such as height limits, setbacks/build-to lines, and site coverage.

The Project’s location along SR-116 would introduce new development on a vacant site that would partially obstruct views of surrounding hillsides from certain vantage points, particularly along streets adjacent to the site (e.g. Redwood Drive). However, potential impacts to scenic visual and the visual character have been considered in the 2013 General Plan FEIR and the Statement of Overriding considerations. This includes recognizing that development may change the skyline and obstruct or interfere with views of the surrounding hilllsides and that there is no mitigation available to fully reduce impact on visual character. Furthermore, the project is subject to the City’s Design Review process and findings, which is intended to ensure that the City’s visual character and aesthetic quality is maintained. Therefore, the Project will not result in a substantial new or more severe impact to aesthetic resources relative to what was identified in the 2013 General Plan EIR.

5.2(b) (Scenic Resources within a Scenic Highway) – No Substantial Change Relative to the General Plan EIR
The 2013 General Plan EIR, as shown on 2013 General Plan EIR Figure 3.1-1, determined there are no officially designated state scenic highways or highways eligible for a designation by the California Department of Transportation Scenic Highways Program within the City. The most recent CalTrans California State Scenic Highway Map designates SR-116 as eligible for designation as a scenic highway.

However, the Project is located along a section of SR-116 within the urban growth boundary of the 2 City of Cotati. Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the 2013 Cotati General Plan Update. November 2014. Pages 27-28.
291 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 27 of 158 CEQA Analysis
City of Cotati. It is surrounded by urban uses including established and approved commercial and residential development. The project will comply with required setbacks and the design includes landscaping and the planting of street trees along SR-116 for the length of the project frontage.

Additionally, the project aims to preserve native oaks. Tree removal includes one Eucalyptus and up to two additional oak trees located along the project frontage. In accordance with Environmental Condition of Approval (COA) BIO-4, any trees removed will be in compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 17.54 and the conditions of the Tree Permit. As such, the project will not damage scenic resources within a designated state scenic highway. Accordingly, the Project will not result in a substantial new or more severe impact relative to what was identified in the 2013 General Plan EIR.

5.4(d) (Lighting and Glare) – No Substantial Change Relative to the General Plan EIR The Project is located on an undeveloped site surrounded by existing commercial development and residential uses, vacant parcels approved for future residential and mixed use development, roadways, and various sources of existing lighting including streetlights, buildings, and headlights from vehicles. The Project proposes outdoor lighting, consisting of new lighting for the access roads, woonerfs, driveways and parking areas, pedestrian areas, and building entries. The City’s uniformly applied standards require lighting to have a shielded downward light source no taller than fourteen feet in height. A final lighting detail and design is required to be reviewed for compliance with Cotati Municipal Code Chapter 17.30.060 prior to issuance of the building permit and is imposed by COA AES-1. Additionally, as documented in the Public Works/Engineering Project Conditions Approval Memo, the project is required to comply with City Standard’s for exterior lighting and final lighting plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.

Lighting associated with new development was anticipated by the 2013 General Plan EIR and the Project site is located in an area designated to accommodate commercial and residential development with existing adjacent sources of lighting. As conditioned, the Project will not result in a substantial new or more severe impact relative to what was identified in the 2013 General Plan EIR.
2013 General Plan EIR Mitigating Policies and Actions
Action LU 1c: Prioritize the processing of development applications for infill, underutilized, or vacant parcels designated for urban uses over those projects requiring annexation.

Status: The project site has previously been graded as part of a prior development approval and remains undeveloped with a land use designation providing for commercial and residential uses in an area containing other existing and planned commercial and residential development. The project site is located within the city limits and annexation is not required. As such, the project complies with this policy.

Action CON 1l: Require assessment of public views and ridgelines as part of the project review process to assure that projects protect natural resources through proper site planning, building design, and landscaping.
292 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 28 of 158 CEQA Analysis
Status: Assessment of views was provided through a viewshed analysis consisting of existing viewshed conditions and conceptual renderings viewed at the SR-116 and proposed project entry. 3 The Project introduces new buildings that would obscure views to hillsides from certain locations, however the Project site is designated for development and the Project has been designed to meet applicable development standards within the municipal code regulating the size, scale, and setbacks and waivers/concessions thereto as provided in the State Density Bonus Law. As proposed, the Project complies with this policy.

Action OS 1f: Review all development proposals, planning projects, and infrastructure projects to ensure that open space and scenic resource impacts are reduced by maximizing design features that preserve a sense of open space and by minimizing off-site and night sky impacts of outdoor lighting consistent, with the requirements of the Land Use Code.

Status: The proposed project will create a triangular park adjacent to the private park to the north of the project site that is located east of the Cotati Cottages. Additionally, the Project includes development of a multi-use path along SR-116 which will be separated from SR-116 by a 10-foot vegetated buffer and lined with trees. Further, to ensure lighting is in compliance with this action COA AES-1 requires a final lighting plan be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. As conditioned, the Project is consistent with this policy.

Conclusion and Environmental Conditions of Approval
The Project is within the scope of development projected under the General Plan and would not result in any substantial new or more severe impacts to aesthetics relative to what was identified in the 2013 General Plan EIR. Furthermore, there are no circumstances peculiar to the Project site and there have been no substantial changes in environmental circumstances that would result in new or more severe significant environmental effects than were identified and evaluated in the 2013 General Plan EIR. The following environmental conditions of approval would apply to the Project to implement requirements of the 2013 General Plan EIR mitigating policies and actions:

AES-1: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a final lighting plan and the City shall verify that the final lighting plan complies with applicable requirements set forth in Section

17.30.060 of the Cotati Municipal Code, in accordance with General Plan Action OS1f to minimize offsite and night sky impacts of outdoor lighting. 3 Redwood Row Project Plans submitted by City Ventures dated November 14, 2024. Pages A0.1.1 and A0.3. 293 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 29 of 158 CEQA Analysis

5.2. AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
Would The Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
More
Severe
Impact
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
No
Substantial
Change
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
No Change
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or
cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined
in Public Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as defined by
Public Resources Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland Production
(as defined by Government Code section
51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
Sources: Cotati General Plan and 2013 General Plan EIR adopted and certified on March 24, 2015; California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program accessed on December 5, 2024; Sonoma County Permit Sonoma GIS, Williamson Act Contracts, 2019; and USGS Land Cover Classification System. 2013 General Plan EIR Findings
The City of Cotati 2013 General Plan EIR determined that approximately 36.42 acres of Farmland of Local Importance within the City limits may be converted to urbanized land uses upon full buildout of the General Plan. The 36.42 acres of Farmland of Local Importance are not under 294 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 30 of 158 CEQA Analysis
Williamson Act Contract and represent less than nine percent of the total acreage of Important Farmlands within the Cotati Planning Area. Approximately 63.46 acres of land cover within the City of Cotati are used for agricultural purposes. The 2013 General Plan EIR concluded that with implementation of the policies and action items in the General Plan, impacts to agricultural and forestry resources would be less than significant. The following impacts to agriculture and forestry resources were considered under the 2013 General Plan EIR:
• Impact 3.9-3: Implementation of the General Plan would not result in the conversion of farmland, including Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide Importance. While implementation of the 2013 General Plan would result in the future urbanization of a small amount of Farmland of Local Importance, over 90 percent of the Important Farmlands within the Planning Area would be preserved and protected for ongoing viable agricultural use upon buildout of the General Plan. As such, this impact is considered less than significant.
• Impact 3.8-4: Implementation of the General Plan would not conflict with existing farmlands, agricultural zoning, or Williamson Act Contracts and would have a less than significant impact. • The City of Cotati 2013 General Plan EIR determined that there are no lands within or adjacent to the city that are currently zoned as forest land, timber, or timber production. Therefore, implementation of the General Plan would have no impact on forest land, timber, or timber production.
• There is no agriculturally zoned land within City limits, and the 36.42 acres of Farmland of Local Importance may be converted to urbanized land uses, which are not under any Williamson Act Contract and represent less than nine percent of the total acreage of Important Farmlands evaluated within the Planning Area.

Project Consistency with the 2013 General Plan EIR

5.2 (a-e) (Farmland, Agricultural Land, Forest Land) – No Change Relative to the General Plan EIR
There are no farmland, agricultural lands, or forest lands onsite. The Project site was historically used for ranching activities and as horse pasture until the early 1990s. The site began to be affected by both onsite and offsite non-ranching activities in the late 1960s. During the 1970s and 1980s, improvements to SR-116 and surrounding flood control measures altered the existing topography, hydrology, and soil conditions of the project site. In 2003, the site was fully authorized for development by the City of Cotati and the state and federal resources agencies as part of the South Sonoma Business Park.4 The project site is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance pursuant to FMMP nor is it designated as forestland pursuant to Section 12220(g) of the Public Resources Code. In addition, the site is not zoned for agricultural use or designated as a Williamson Act contract. As such, impacts of the Project to agricultural resources will be equal or less severe than impacts identified in the 2013 General Plan EIR. 4 Biological Resources Analysis prepared by Monk and Associates on September 24, 2024. 295 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 31 of 158 CEQA Analysis
2013 General Plan EIR Mitigating Policies and Actions
There are no 2013 General Plan EIR mitigation measures nor mitigating policies and actions which are applicable to the Project.

Conclusion
The Project is within the scope of development projected under the General Plan and would not result in any substantial new or more severe impacts to agricultural and forestry resources relative to what was identified in the 2013 General Plan EIR. Furthermore, there are no circumstances peculiar to the Project site and there have been no substantial changes in environmental circumstances that would result in new or more severe significant environmental effects than were identified and evaluated in the 2013 General Plan EIR. No Conditions of Approval are required beyond compliance with uniformly applied development standards and applicable local and state regulations. 296 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 32 of 158 CEQA Analysis

5.3. AIR QUALITY
Would The Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
More
Severe
Impact
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
No
Substantial
Change
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
No Change
Relative to
General
Plan EIR
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as
those leading to odors) adversely
affecting a substantial number of people?
Sources: Cotati General Plan and 2013 General Plan EIR adopted and certified on March 24, 2015; BAAQMD 2017 Bay Area Clean Air Plan; BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, April 2022; and Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment by Illingworth and Rodkin on December 20, 2024.
2013 General Plan EIR Findings
The 2013 General Plan EIR evaluated potential impacts to air quality and determined that with implementation of General Plan Policies and Actions that mitigate potential impacts, impacts to air quality would be less than significant. The following impacts to air quality were considered under the 2013 General Plan EIR:
• Impact 3.2-1: The General Plan would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. Through the implementation of mitigating General Plan Policies CON 2.1 - CON 2.12, CON 3.1- CON 3.20, LU 1.4, LU 1.5, LU 2.3, LU 2.5, LU 2.9, LU 2.10, LU 3.2, LU 3.8, CI 1.2, CI 1.6, CI 1.9, CI 1.17 - CI 1.21, CI 2.17 – CI 2.19 and mitigating Actions CON 2a – CON 2g, CON 3a – CON 3r, implementation of the General Plan would have a less than significant impact.
• Impact 3.2-2: The General Plan would not cause health risks associated with toxic air contaminants. Through the implementation of mitigating General Plan Policies CON 2.1- CON

2.3, CON 2.5 and mitigating Actions CON 2a – CON 2d, implementation of the General Plan would have a less than significant impact.
297 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 33 of 158 CEQA Analysis
• Impact 3.2-3: Implementation of the General Plan would not create objectionable odors and would have a less than significant.
• Impact 3.2-4: Implementation of the General Plan would not conflict with Regional Plans and would have a less than significant.

National and State Regulations
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets nationwide emission standards for mobile sources that include on-road motor vehicles and non-road vehicles and equipment, which captures trucks and equipment used in construction. The EPA has established nationwide fuel standards, however the State may set motor vehicle emission standards and standards for fuel that are at least as stringent as national standards. In the past decade, the EPA has established numerous standards for heavy-diesel engines, which are a significant source of NOX and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). Diesel particulate matter (DPM) has been identified by the EPA as a probable carcinogen.

Implementation of the standards are estimated to reduce particulate matter and NOX emissions from diesel engines up to 95 percent in 2030, when the heavy-duty fleet is completely replaced by newer emission compliant vehicles. The EPA has also substantially reduced the amount of sulfur, a significant contributor to formation of particulate matter in diesel engine exhaust, allowed in diesel fuels. The federal diesel engine and diesel fuel requirements have been adopted by California, with modifications in some cases containing more stringent requirements or sooner implementation dates.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) establishes statewide standards for emissions reductions.

CARB has developed a plan to reduce diesel emission, the Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emission from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles. In addition to requiring more stringent emission standards to aim for a reduction of particulate matter emission by 90 percent in new mobile sources and stationary diesel engines, the plan includes emission control strategies for existing diesel vehicles and engines. CARB has also adopted regulations to reduce DPM and NOX emission from existing and new off-road heavy-duty diesel vehicles, which include certain construction equipment.

Regulations intended to reduce particulate matter and NOX exhaust equipment include replacing older equipment with newer equipment or conducting retrofits.

Bay Area Air Quality Management District
The City of Cotati is located within the San Francisco Bay Area air basin and regulated by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The Bay Area Air Basin is designated as non-attainment for both the one-hour and eight-hour state ozone (O3) standards, 0.09 parts per million (ppm) and

0.07 ppm, respectively. The Bay Area Air Basin is also in non-attainment for PM10 and PM2.5 state standards, which require an annual arithmetic mean (AAM) of less than 20 µg/m3for PM10 and less than 12 µg/m3for PM2.5. In addition, the Basin is designated as non-attainment for the national 24- hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5). All other national ambient air quality standards within the Bay Area Air Basin are in attainment.

The air quality analyses in the 2013 General Plan EIR relied on prior BAAQMD screening criteria and clean air plans. Since preparation of the 2013 General Plan EIR, the BAAQMD has adopted the 2017 Bay Area Clean Air Plan (CAP). On April 20, 2022, BAAQMD adopted new CEQA thresholds for determining the level of significance for a development project along with new screening criteria. 298 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 34 of 158 CEQA Analysis
Local Regulation
The 2013 General Plan EIR determined that implementation of the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts with the following mitigating policies: Policies CON 2.1- CON 2.12, CON 3.1- CON 3.20, LU 1.4, LU 1.5, LU 2.3, LU 2.5, LU 2.9, LU 2.10, LU 3.2, LU 3.8, CI1.2, CI 1.6, CI 1.9, CI 1.17-

1.20, CI 1.21, and CI 2.17- 2.19 and Actions CON 2a-2d and 3a-3r.

The 2013 General Plan EIR determined that the implementation of the General Plan would be consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan and would not impede efforts to reduce air quality emissions at the regional level.

Project Consistency with the 2013 General Plan EIR
The Project site is located in San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SF Air Basin), within the Cotati Valley Region. Wind patterns in the Cotati Valley are strongly influenced by the Petaluma Gap, with winds flowing predominantly from the west (BAAQMD 2017a). Cotati Valley has a potential for reduced air quality due to a larger population, industrial facilities in and around Santa Rosa, and increased motor vehicle traffic and the associated air contaminants.

The Bay Area meets all ambient air quality standards with the exception of ground-level ozone, respirable particulate matter (PM10) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). In Sonoma County, measured levels of air pollutants are below air quality standards, including ozone, PM10 and PM2.5. High ozone levels are caused by the cumulative emissions of reactive organic gases (ROG) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). These precursor pollutants react under certain meteorological conditions to form high ozone levels. Controlling the emissions of these precursor pollutants is the focus of the Bay Area’s attempts to reduce ozone levels. The highest ozone levels in the Bay Area occur in the eastern and southern inland valleys that are downwind of air pollutant sources. High ozone levels aggravate respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, reduced lung function, and increase coughing and chest discomfort.

Particulate matter is assessed and measured in terms of respirable particulate matter or particles that have a diameter of 10 micrometers or less (PM10) and fine particulate matter where particles have a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less (PM2.5). Elevated concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 are the result of both region-wide (or cumulative) emissions and localized emissions. High particulate matter levels aggravate respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, reduce lung function, increase mortality (e.g., lung cancer), and result in reduced lung function growth in children.

Toxic air contaminants (TAC) are a broad class of compounds known to cause morbidity or mortality (usually because they cause cancer) and include, but are not limited to, the criteria air pollutants listed above. TACs are found in ambient air, especially in urban areas, and are caused by industry, agriculture, fuel combustion, and commercial operations (e.g., dry cleaners). TACs are typically found in low concentrations, even near their source (e.g., diesel particulate matter near a freeway). Because chronic exposure can result in adverse health effects, TACs are regulated at the regional, State, and Federal level.

Diesel exhaust is the predominant TAC in urban air and is estimated to represent about three quarters of the cancer risk from TACs (based on the Bay Area average). According to the California Air Resources Board (CARB), diesel exhaust is a complex mixture of gases, vapors and fine particles. This complexity makes the evaluation of health effects of diesel exhaust a complex scientific issue. Some of the chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as benzene and formaldehyde, have been previously identified as TACs by the CARB, and are listed as carcinogens either under the state's Proposition 65 or under the Federal Hazardous Air Pollutants programs.
299 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 35 of 158 CEQA Analysis

5.3(a,b) (Conflict with Plan, Increase Criteria Pollutants) – No Substantial Change Relative to the General Plan EIR
An Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment was prepared by Illingworth and Rodkin, Inc. on December 20, 2024 using CalEEMod. The Air Quality analysis included 134 condominiums each with an individual garage (312,836 sf), 44 affordable apartment units (34,000 sf), commercial space (10,032 sf) and 90 parking spaces, which exceeds the actual number of proposed parking spaces (82).

The most recent and comprehensive air quality plan is the Bay Area 2017 Clean Air Plan. The primary goals of the Clean Air Plan are to attain air quality standards, reduce population exposure and protect public health, and reduce GHG emissions and protect the climate. The BAAQMD has also developed CEQA guidelines to assist lead agencies in evaluating the significance of air quality and GHG impacts.

In formulating compliance strategies, BAAQMD relies on the planned land uses identified in local general plans. Land use planning affects vehicle travel, which, in turn, affects region-wide emissions of air pollutants and GHGs. The plan includes CEQA Thresholds which are seen below in Table 5.1.

These thresholds determine whether the project would have construction and operational emissions below the BAAQMD thresholds.

Table 5.1: Air Quality Significance Thresholds
Criteria Air Pollutant
Construction Thresholds Operational Thresholds
Average Daily Emissions
(lbs./day)
Average Daily
Emissions
(lbs./day)
Annual Average
Emissions
(tons/year)
ROG 54 54 10
NOx 54 54 10
PM10 82 (Exhaust) 82 15
PM2.5 54 (Exhaust) 54 10
CO Not Applicable 9.0 ppm (8-hour average) or 20.0
ppm (1-hour average)
Fugitive Dust Construction Dust
Ordinance or other BMP Not Applicable
Health Risks and Hazards
Single Sources Within
1,000-foot Zone of
Influence
Combined Sources (Cumulative
from all sources within 1,000-foot
zone of influence)
Excess Cancer Risk >10 per one million >100 per one million Hazard Index >1.0 >10.0
Incremental annual PM2.5 >0.3 µg/m3 >0.8 µg/m3
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land
Use
Projects
– (Must
Include
A or B)
A. Projects must include, at a minimum, the following project design elements:

1. Buildings
a. The project will not include natural gas appliances or natural gas plumbing (in both residential and nonresidential development).
b. The project will not result in any wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary energy usage as determined by the analysis required under CEQA Section 21100(b)(3) and Section 15126.2(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

2. Transportation
300 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 36 of 158 CEQA Analysis
The Project’s Air Quality Assessment was conducted using the 2022 BAAQMD CEQA guidelines.

Construction Emissions
To estimate the emissions from construction of the Project and long-term operations, the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2022 was used. CalEEMod is a statewide model designed to provide a uniform platform to quantify air quality emissions from land use projects, which allows for projection of emissions from on-site construction activity, construction vehicle trips, and evaporative emissions. Calculations of the Project’s emissions were performed as part of the air quality and greenhouse gas assessment (Appendix A) and compared to thresholds of significance as established by BAAQMD.

The construction build-out scenario including equipment list and schedule, were based on projectspecific information provided by the project applicant. On-site activities are primarily made up of construction equipment emissions, while offsite activities include worker, hauling, and vendor traffic.

The construction schedule assumed that the earliest possible start date would be January 2025 and the project would be built out over a period of approximately 19 months, or 405 construction workdays. The earliest year of operation was assumed to be 2027. Average daily emissions were computed by dividing the total construction emissions by the number of active workdays. Table 5.2 shows the average daily construction emissions of ROG, NOX, PM10 exhaust, and PM2.5 exhaust during construction of the project. As indicated in Table 5.2, predicted annualized project construction emissions would not exceed the BAAQMD significance thresholds during any year of construction.

Table 5.2 Construction Period Emissions
Year ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Construction Emissions Per Year (Tons)
2025 0.26 2.18 0.08 0.07
2026 2.59 0.68 0.02 0.02
a. Achieve a reduction in project-generated vehicle miles traveled (VMT) below the regional average consistent with the current version of the California Climate Change Scoping Plan (currently 15 percent) or meet a locally adopted Senate Bill 743 VMT target, reflecting the recommendations provided in the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research’s Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA:
i. Residential projects: 15 percent below the existing VMT per capita ii. Office projects: 15 percent below the existing VMT per employee iii. Retail projects: no net increase in existing VMT
b. Achieve compliance with off-street electric vehicle requirements in the most recently adopted version of CALGreen Tier 2.

B. Be consistent with a local GHG reduction strategy that meets the criteria under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b).

Source: BAAQMD’s April 2022 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines Note: BMP = Best Management Practices, ROG = reactive organic gases, NOx = nitrogen oxides, PM10 = course particulate matter or particulates with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers (µm) or less, PM2.5 = fine particulate matter or particulates with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5µm or less.
301 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 37 of 158 CEQA Analysis
Average Daily Construction Emissions Per Year (pounds/day) 2025 (261 construction workdays) 1.99 16.72 0.62 0.57
2026 (144 construction workdays) 35.96 9.46 0.33 0.30
BAAQMD Threshold (pounds/day) 54 54 82 54
Exceed Threshold? No No No No
Construction activities, particularly during site preparation and grading, would temporarily generate fugitive dust in the form of PM10 and PM2.5. Sources of fugitive dust would include disturbed soils at the construction site and trucks carrying uncovered loads of soils. Unless properly controlled, vehicles leaving the site would deposit mud on local streets, which could be an additional source of airborne dust after it dries. The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines consider these impacts to be less-thansignificant if best management practices are implemented to reduce these emissions. In compliance with the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines and as required by General Plan Policy CON 2.5, COA AQ-1 has been established to require the implementation of BAAQMD Best Management Practices to reduce fugitive dust emissions.

Operational Emissions
Operational air emissions from the project would be generated primarily from vehicles driven by future residents and employees. Evaporative emissions from architectural coatings and maintenance products (classified as consumer products) are also typical emissions generated during operation from the Project’s proposed uses.

The Air Quality Assessment, conservatively analyzed emissions from approximately 1,746 daily trips.

When accounting for trip reduction adjustments that include internal capture, the trip rate entered into CalEEMod was 1,558 net daily trips. The operational emissions anticipated by the project are shown in Table 5.3. In addition to vehicle emissions, the operational emissions include emissions from electricity consumption, solid waste, and wastewater treatment associated with the project. Emission calculations assume 365 days of operation per year. As shown in Table 5.3, the operational period emissions would not exceed BAAQMD thresholds.

Table 5.3 Operational Emissions
Scenario ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
2027 Annual Project Operations Emissions (Tons/year) 2.81 1.04 1.58 0.41 BAAQMD Thresholds (tons/year) 10 10 15 10
2027 Daily Project Operational Emissions (lbs/day)1 15.40 5.67 8.63 2.26 BAAQMD Thresholds (lbs/day) 54 54 82 54
Exceed Thresholds? No No No No
The Project would not result in a significant increase in criteria air pollutants or conflict with a Clean Air Plan because, as conditioned, the Project would have construction and operational emissions below the BAAQMD thresholds, would be on an urban site planned for urban development, and would be located near employment centers, goods and services. Further, the proposed project supports the primary goals of the Clean Air Plan, which are protecting public health and protecting the Climate.

Therefore, as conditioned, the Project will not result in a substantial new or more severe impact relative to what was identified in the 2013 General Plan EIR. 302 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 38 of 158 CEQA Analysis

5.3(c) (Sensitive Receptors) – No Change Relative to the General Plan EIR CARB has identified the following persons who are most likely to be affected by air pollution: children under 16, the elderly over 65, athletes, and people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. These groups are classified as sensitive receptors. Locations that may contain a high concentration of these sensitive population groups include residential areas, hospitals, daycare facilities, elder care facilities, elementary schools, and parks. For cancer risk assessments, children are the most sensitive receptors, since they are more susceptible to cancer causing TACs. Residential locations are assumed to include infants and small children. The closest sensitive receptors to the site are the existing residents in the townhomes north of the project site, and other single-family homes in the surrounding area.

Project impacts related to increased health risk could occur by generating emissions of TACs and air pollutants. The Project would introduce new sources of TACs during construction from vehicle and equipment operation and during operation from new vehicle traffic consisting of mostly light-duty gasoline-powered vehicles, which would produce TAC and air pollutant emissions.

Impacts to existing sensitive receptors were addressed for temporary construction activities as well as long-term operations. The Project site is exposed to several sources of existing TACs and localized air pollutants in the vicinity of the project. The impact of the existing sources of TACs was assessed in terms of the cumulative risk which includes the project contribution, as well as the risk on the new sensitive receptors introduced by the project.

Construction equipment and associated heavy-duty truck traffic generates diesel exhaust, which is a known toxic air contaminant (TAC). Although exhaust would not be considered to contribute substantially to air quality violations, construction exhaust emissions may still pose health risks for sensitive receptors (e.g., nearby residents). The primary community risk impacts associated with construction emissions are cancer risk and PM2.5 exposure. The health risk assessment for the Project’s construction activities was conducted to evaluate potential health effects to nearby sensitive receptors from construction emissions of Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) and PM2.5 which included dispersion modeling to predict the offsite and onsite concentrations.

Health risk impacts were evaluated by predicting increased cancer risk, the increase in annual PM2.5 concentrations, and computing the Hazard Index (HI) for non-cancer health risks. The risk impacts from the project are the combination of risk from construction and operation sources. These sources include on-site construction activity, construction truck hauling, and increased traffic from the project.

To evaluate the increased cancer risks from the project, a 30-year exposure period was used, per BAAQMD guidance, with the sensitive receptors being exposed to both project construction and operation emissions during this timeframe.

The project increased cancer risk is computed by summing the project construction cancer risk and operation cancer risk contribution. Unlike the increased maximum cancer risk, the annual PM2.5 concentration, and HI values are not additive but based on an annual maximum value for the entirety of the project. The project maximally exposed individual (MEI) is identified as the sensitive receptor that is most impacted by the project’s construction and operation. The nearby existing residences surrounding the project site and the future Cotati Village #1 residences, as shown in Figure 6.

Residential receptors are assumed to include all receptor groups (e.g., third trimester, infants, children, and adults) with almost continuous exposure to project emissions. While there are additional 303 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 39 of 158 CEQA Analysis
sensitive receptors within 1,000 feet of the project site, the receptors chosen are adequate to identify maximum impacts from the project.

Impacts to existing residents adjacent to the Project site could occur during construction activities. In compliance with the BAAQMD recommendations, a community risk assessment was conducted, as part of the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Appendix A) that evaluated health risks from construction and operation, including predicting increased cancer risk, estimating increase in annual diesel particulate matter (DPM) and PM2.5 concentrations, and computing the Hazard Index (HI) for non-cancer health risks. The following BAAQMD thresholds of significance were used to determine whether the Project would create a significant adverse impact related to health risks and hazards as follows:

Project Level Thresholds of Significance
• Increase cancer risk greater than 10 in a million
• Increased hazard greater than 1 (chronic or acute)
• Increase PM2.5 greater than 0.3 μg/m3 annual average
Cumulative Thresholds of Significance
• Cancer risk greater than 100 in a million (from all local sources) • Hazard greater than 10 (chronic from all local sources) • PM2.5 greater than 0.8 μg/m3 annual average
Potential impacts were evaluated for construction and operation of the Project. Nearby sensitive receptors and the maximum exposed individual receptor (MEI) are shown in Figure 6. It is assumed that the approved Cotati Village 1 Project will be constructed prior to the construction of this project.

As such, the future units are considered in the identification of the nearest unit and the MEI. In the event that Cotati Village 1 is not built prior to Redwood Row, the Cotati Cottages located northwest of the Project site would be the nearest MEI, but as that would be farther than the nearest unit proposed for Cotati Village 1, the impacts on the nearest unit of the Cotati Cottages would be less than the impacts on the MEI identified because it would be farther away. Therefore, using the units in Cotati Village 1 as the MEI is a more conservative estimate than using the existing units in the Cotati Cottages. 304 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 40 of 158 CEQA Analysis
Figure 6: Location of Project Construction Site, Off Site Sensitive Receptors, and Maximum TAC Impacts (MEI)
Source: Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Assessment, prepared by Illingworth & Rodkin, December 20, 2024.

Project Construction
Using U.S. EPA ISCST3 dispersion model, the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment modeled predicted annual DPM and PM2.5 concentrations at nearby sensitive receptors to find the Maximum Exposed Individual (MEI), which represents the most sensitive receptor receiving the great impact from the Project. Emission sources for the construction site were grouped into two categories:
exhaust emissions of DPM and fugitive PM2.5 dust emissions.

Concentrations were calculated at nearby residential receptors at receptor heights of 1.5 meters (5 feet above ground) and 4.5 meters (15 feet above ground), representative of the breathing heights of residents in first and second floor levels. Construction was assumed to occur for 9 hours per day (8:00am – 5:00pm). The MEI most affected by construction cancer risk was located on the second floor (15 feet above ground) of an approved (not yet constructed) residence on the Cotati Village #1 project site. The MEI for annual PM2.5 concentration was identified in the same location but on the first floor (5 feet). Project risk impacts are shown in Table 5.4.
305 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 41 of 158 CEQA Analysis
Table 5.4: Construction Risk Impacts at the Off-Site Project MEI Source Cancer Risk
(per million)
Annual PM2.5
(µg/m3)
Hazard
Index
Project Construction Impacts
Project Construction (Years 0 - 2) Unmitigated 5.68 (infant) 0.06 0.01 BAAQMD Single-Source Threshold 10 0.3 1.0
Exceed Threshold? Unmitigated No No No
Source: Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Assessment, prepared by Illingworth & Rodkin, December 20, 2024.

The predicted HI values from project construction activities at the MEI location would not exceed the threshold. The uncontrolled maximum cancer risks and annual PM2.5 concentration would not exceed their respective single-source significance thresholds. Therefore, there would be no significant impact in terms of increased cancer risk and PM2.5 concentrations.

Operational Emissions
The typical operations of the Project as a residential development are expected to generate long-term emissions from mobile sources (i.e., traffic); However, emissions from operation of the residential use are considered to have a negligible health risk impact.

Cumulative Health Risks of All TAC Sources at the Off-Site Project MEIs The cumulative health risk assessment included all substantial sources of TACs that can affect sensitive receptors located within 1,000 feet of the project site including Highway 101, State Route 116, and five stationary sources of TACs. The TAC and PM2.5 sources within 1,000 feet of the project are shown in Figure 7 below.
306 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 42 of 158 CEQA Analysis
Figure 7: Project Site and Nearby TAC and PM2.5 Sources Source: Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Assessment, prepared by Illingworth & Rodkin, December 20, 2024.

As the project MEIs are located near U.S. 101 and SR-116, a refined analysis of the impacts of TACs and PM2.5 to the MEI receptors is necessary to evaluate potential cancer risks and PM2.5 concentrations from both highways. A review of the traffic information reported by Caltrans indicated that U.S. 101 traffic included 108,000 vehicles per day (based on an annual average) that are about

5.71 percent trucks, of which 3.4 percent are considered diesel heavy duty trucks and 2.3 percent are medium duty trucks. The same Caltrans data indicated that SR-116 traffic included 23,600 vehicles per day (based on an annual average) that are about 6.66 percent trucks, of which 3.4 percent are considered diesel heavy duty trucks and 3.2 percent are medium duty trucks.

To estimate TAC and PM2.5 emissions over the 30-year exposure period used for calculating the increased cancer risks for sensitive receptors at the MEIs, the CT-EMFAC2021 model was used to develop vehicle emission factors for the year 2025 (construction start year). Emissions associated with vehicle travel depend on the year of analysis because emission control technology requirements are phased-in over time. Therefore, the earlier the year analyzed in the model, the higher the emission rates utilized by CT-EMFAC2021. Year 2025 emissions were conservatively assumed as being representative of future conditions over the time period that cancer risks are evaluated since, overall vehicle emissions, and in particular diesel truck emissions, will decrease in the future. Dispersion modeling of TAC and PM2.5 emissions was conducted using the EPA ISCST3 air quality dispersion model.
307 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 43 of 158 CEQA Analysis
The cumulative impacts analysis assumes that Cotati Village 1 will not be under construction at the same time as the Project. The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment prepared by Illingworth and Rodkin assume that Cotati Village 1 will be completed and occupied prior to construction of the Project. However, current estimates from the owners of Cotati Village 1 have indicated that they do not anticipate beginning construction for at least five years. While this would change whether sensitive receptors are on the Cotati Village 1 site, it still would not result in overlapping construction because the Redwood Row Project would be completed and operating prior to construction commencing on Cotati Village 1.

The cumulative health risk impacts at the location of the MEI are shown in Table 5.5. They include Highway 101, SR-116, an automotive repair facility, an [emergency] generator, and two gas stations.

Table 5.5: Cumulative Health Risk Impacts at the Location of the Project MEIs (Off-Site) Source Cancer Risk
(per million)
Annual PM2.5
(µg/m3)
Hazard
Index
U.S. 101, ADT: 111,239 1.27 0.02 <0.01
SR-116, ADT: 24,408 3.70 0.16 <0.01
Nor-Cal Truckbodys (Facility ID #13661, Automotive
Repair), MEIs at 1000+ feet.

0.00 0.00 0.00
Lowe's HIW Inc #1901 (Facility ID # 16825,
Generator), MEIs at 650 feet.

0.88 <0.01 0.00
Save On Gas Inc. dba Cotati Gas Mart (Facility ID
#111461, Gas Dispensing Facility), MEIs at 1000+
feet

1.00 0.00 0.03
APRO LLC dba United Pacific #5426 (Facility ID
#112559, Gas Dispensing Facility), MEIs at 1000+
feet.

0.22 0.00 0.01
Combined Sources Unmitigated 12.75 <0.25 <0.07
BAAQMD Cumulative Source Threshold 100 0.8 10.0
Exceed Threshold? Unmitigated No No No
Source: Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Assessment, prepared by Illingworth & Rodkin, December 20, 2024.

As shown in the table above, the Project will not have cumulative impacts that exceed the BAAQMD and will not result in a new significant impact or increase the severity of an impact identified in the General Plan EIR.

Operational On-Site Health Risk Assessment for TAC Sources The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines recommend that proposed projects that include sensitive receptors address the potential health risk impacts of nearby sources. In compliance with BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines and General Plan Policy CON 2.2, a health risk assessment was completed to assess 308 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 44 of 158 CEQA Analysis
any potential land use conflicts that the existing TAC sources would have on the new proposed sensitive receptors (i.e., residents) introduced by the project.

The cumulative sources of TACs assessed include Highway 101 and SR-116, stationary sources (see Table 5.6), and construction impacts from Cotati Village 1.

Table 5.6: Cumulative Health Risk Impacts Upon the On-Site Sensitive Receptors Source Cancer Risk
(per million)
Annual PM2.5
(µg/m3)
Hazard
Index
U.S. 101, ADT: 113,399 3.36 0.06 <0.01
SR-116, ADT: 24,780 4.81 0.20 <0.01
Cotati Village #1 Controlled Construction Impacts 4.50 0.11 <0.01 Nor-Cal Truckbodys (Facility ID #13661,
Automotive Repair), MEIs at 1000+ feet. 0.00 0.00 0.00
Lowe's HIW Inc #1901 (Facility ID # 16825,
Generator), MEIs at 650 feet. 9.78 0.01 <0.01
Save On Gas Inc. dba Cotati Gas Mart (Facility ID
#111461, Gas Dispensing Facility), MEIs at 1000+
feet

7.17 0.00 <0.01
APRO LLC dba United Pacific #5426 (Facility ID
#112559, Gas Dispensing Facility), MEIs at 1000+
feet.

2.37 0.00 0.47
BAAQMD Single-Source Threshold 10 0.3 1.0
Exceed Threshold? No No No
Cumulative Total 31.99 0.38 0.95
BAAQMD Cumulative Source Threshold 100 0.8 10.0
Exceed Threshold? No No No
As shown in Table 5.6, the existing sources of TAC emissions do not exceed the BAAQMD single-source or cumulative-source thresholds for cancer risk, annual PM2.5 concentration, or HI. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant.

As proposed, the Project will not result in a new significant impact or substantially increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact to sensitive receptors relative to the 2013 General Plan EIR.

5.3(d) (Odors) – No Substantial Change Relative to the General Plan EIR The Project would result in generation of emissions during construction and long-term operation that may be a source of odors. Development of the Project site is consistent with the land use designation applicable to the site and would not feature uses with typical odor-generating operations (e.g., wastewater treatment plants, landfills, and composting facilities). During operation, the most significant source of emissions would be from the routine operation of vehicles traveling through streets in and around the site. The majority of vehicular travel associated with the uses of the Project is expected to be from light-duty vehicles, and odors from vehicle emissions would not be substantially different from the existing environment that includes existing residential uses to the north and SR-116 roadway to the south.
309 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 45 of 158 CEQA Analysis
During construction, diesel fume emissions from operation of diesel-fueled equipment and heavyduty trucks would create odors that may be considered objectionable. However, construction activities will be temporary and limited to construction hours as provided under Cotati Municipal Code Chapter 17.30 or as provided in conditions of approval. Standard hours of construction are MondayFriday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; Saturday, Sundays, and Holidays are only allowed by the review authority through conditions of approval between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Additionally, COA AQ-1 will minimize emissions and associated odors. Accordingly, the Project would not be expected to result in substantial objectionable odors.

As conditioned, the Project will not result in a new significant impact or substantially increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact relative to the 2013 General Plan EIR. 2013 General Plan EIR Mitigating Policies and Actions
Policy CON 2.1: Improve air quality through continuing to require a compact development pattern that focuses growth in and around existing urbanized areas, locating new housing near places of employment, encouraging alternative modes of transportation, and requiring projects to mitigate significant air quality impacts.

Status: The Project is located on a vacant site planned for high density multifamily residential units and commercial space for a mixed-use and compact development plan. Housing would be located above and near commercial uses onsite as well as in proximity to the site. The Project encourages alternative transportation options by including construction of a Class I multi-use path along the SR116 frontage, incorporating bicycle parking onsite as conditioned, and introducing higher density residential uses in proximity to existing bus stops within a quarter mile of the site. The Project would be subject to COA AQ-1 to minimize air quality emissions during construction activities. As such, the project is consistent with this policy.

Policy CON 2.2: Minimize exposure of sensitive receptors to concentrations of air pollutant emissions and toxic air contaminants.

Status: Recommendations to minimize impacts to less than significant levels are provided in the Air Quality Assessment and have been imposed as COA AQ-1. Therefore, the project is consistent with this policy.

Policy CON 2.4: Require new development or significant remodels to install fireplaces, stoves, and/or heaters which meet current BAAQMD standards.

Status: The Project is required to comply with all building code standards and BAAQMD standards for fireplaces, stoves, and heaters in place at the time of Building Permit submittal. Through the application of uniformly applied development standards, the project is consistent with this policy.

Policy CON 2.5: Continue to require all construction projects and ground disturbing activities to implement BAAQMD dust control and abatement measures.

Status: Recommendations to minimize construction emissions pursuant to BAAQMD’s dust control and abatement measures have been incorporated as COA AQ-1. As such, the project is consistent with this policy.
310 of 539
City of Cotati
Redwood Row Project Page 46 of 158 CEQA Analysis
Policy CI 1.19: Require new development to include effective linkages to the surrounding circulation system for all modes of travel, to the extent feasible.

Status: The Project includes the development of a Class I multiuse path at the SR-116 frontage, which extends the pedestrian and bicycle circulation facilities available around the site. The site also incorporates an internal network of pedestrian pathways. As such, the project is consistent with this policy.

Action CON 2b: Refer development, infrastructure, and planning projects to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) for review. Require project applicants to prepare air quality analyses to address BAAQMD and General Plan requirements, which include analysis and identification of:
• Air pollutant emissions associated with the project during construction, project operation, and cumulative conditions.
• Potential exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants. • Significant air quality impacts associated with the project for construction, project operation, and cumulative conditions.
• Mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts to less than significant or the maximum extent feasible where impacts cannot be mitigated to less than significant.

Cotati City CouncilMay 13, 2025

Cotati City Council
May 13, 2025