Cities Index.
SB 866 Sample Letter

Cotati City Council
May 26, 2026

Document
SB 866 Sample Letter
Meeting
May 26, 2026
Body
Cotati City Council
Original file
10 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cotaticity.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

***CITY LETTERHEAD***
DATE
The Honorable Senator Chris Cabaldon
Member, California State Senate
RE: SB 866 (Blakespear) Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention program:
housing element.

Notice of OPPOSITION
Dear Senator Cabaldon,
The City of Cotati must respectfully oppose SB 866 (Blakespear). SB 866 would require all but 14 cities to add extensive homelessness reporting requirements to their housing elements, targeting cities that do not receive state funding to address homelessness.

Currently, the state’s flagship homelessness grant program, the Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention (HHAP) program, allocates funding to all 58 counties, 44 Continuums of Care (CoCs), and the 14 cities in California with populations over 300,000. To receive HHAP funding, grantees must submit a regionally coordinated homelessness action plan to the Housing and Community Development (HCD) Department that includes specific system performance metrics.

SB 866 would copy these system performance metrics from the HHAP regional plans and impose them as a separate reporting requirement only on cities not receiving state funding – forcing them to track these metrics in their housing elements. Some of the metrics are nearly impossible for cities to collect. For example, the bill requires cities to share information about the number of people who become homeless after exiting institutional settings, including jails, prisons, and hospitals. These are systems operated by counties, the state, or private entities, not cities.

Additionally, some of the data required under SB 866 is already collected through existing systems. CoCs receive federal funding to conduct annual point-in-time counts to gather key homelessness data. This data includes the number of individuals who are unhoused and if an individual has been unhoused long enough to be considered chronically homeless. Despite this information being collected and publicly shared by CoCs, SB 866 shifts the responsibility for collecting and reporting it to cities, without providing us with any additional funding to do so.

The data requirements in SB 866 would create significant administrative burdens for communities that already do not receive state financial support to address homelessness. The challenge of collecting and reporting this data may
jeopardize our ability to achieve a compliant housing element and potentially subject us to legal action by the state.

Our city is also concerned that this measure would create siloed data. SB 866 would require over 400 cities to collect and report data independently through their housing elements, while counties and larger cities continue to do so through regional plans. It is unclear how HCD would synthesize this data into meaningful, actionable policy at the statewide level.

Although we understand the goal of increasing transparency around the efforts of smaller cities to address the state’s homelessness crisis, it can’t be at the expense of burdening the smallest cities with housing element requirements that will not be equally applied to other local governments.

PLEASE CITE SPECIFIC REASONS OF HOW YOUR CITY WILL BE AFFECTED BY THIS BILL.

Each year, the Legislature introduces bills that significantly complicate cities’ efforts to secure housing element certification. These multi-year planning efforts are already complex, timeconsuming, and expensive. SB 866 would add yet another layer of reporting requirements – through a non-reimbursable state mandate – placing a disproportionate burden on smaller cities.

For these reasons, the City of Cotati respectfully oppose SB 866 (Blakespear).

Sincerely,
Sylvia Lemus
Mayor
City of Cotati
cc. The Honorable Assembly Member Damon Connolly
Nancy Hall Bennett, Public Affairs Manager, Cal Cities North Bay Division(via email) League of California Cities, [email protected]

← All documents from this meeting