Agenda packet — Covina City Council, August 20, 2024 (part 5 of 8)

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.9000e0040.0246 9.2000e0031.1000e0043.8400e0031.2000e0043.9600e0031.1100e0031.1000e0041.2200e0030.0000 11.0912 11.0912 3.7000e0041.6000e00311.5761 Worker 4.8400e0033.8400e0030.0521 1.5000e0040.0167 1.0000e0040.0168 4.4400e0039.0000e0054.5300e0030.0000 13.4684 13.4684 3.5000e0043.5000e00413.5805 Total 5.5300e0030.0284 0.0613 2.6000e0040.0206 2.2000e0040.0208 5.5500e0032.0000e0045.7500e0030.0000 24.5596 24.5596 7.2000e0041.9500e00325.1566 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0591 0.4745 0.5217 9.3000e0040.0199 0.0199 0.0191 0.0191 0.0000 76.8542 76.8542 0.0143 0.0000 77.2120 Total 0.0591 0.4745 0.5217 9.3000e0040.0199 0.0199 0.0191 0.0191 0.0000 76.8542 76.8542 0.0143 0.0000 77.2120 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 738 of 1264 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.0000e0040.0149 5.4600e0037.0000e0052.3300e0037.0000e0052.4000e0036.7000e0047.0000e0057.4000e0040.0000 6.6265 6.6265 2.3000e0049.5000e0046.9166 Worker 2.7400e0032.0800e0030.0294 9.0000e0050.0101 6.0000e0050.0102 2.6900e0036.0000e0052.7500e0030.0000 8.0015 8.0015 1.9000e0042.0000e0048.0646 Total 3.1400e0030.0170 0.0349 1.6000e0040.0125 1.3000e0040.0126 3.3600e0031.3000e0043.4900e0030.0000 14.6280 14.6280 4.2000e0041.1500e00314.9812 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0591 0.4745 0.5217 9.3000e0040.0199 0.0199 0.0191 0.0191 0.0000 76.8541 76.8541 0.0143 0.0000 77.2119 Total 0.0591 0.4745 0.5217 9.3000e0040.0199 0.0199 0.0191 0.0191 0.0000 76.8541 76.8541 0.0143 0.0000 77.2119 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 739 of 1264 ends

Page 740 of 1264 ends

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e0041.2000e0041.7500e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.1000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4758 0.4758 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4795 Total 1.6000e0041.2000e0041.7500e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.1000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4758 0.4758 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4795 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.1430 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9900e0030.0134 0.0199 3.0000e0056.7000e0046.7000e0046.7000e0046.7000e0040.0000 2.8086 2.8086 1.6000e0040.0000 2.8125 Total 0.1450 0.0134 0.0199 3.0000e0056.7000e0046.7000e0046.7000e0046.7000e0040.0000 2.8086 2.8086 1.6000e0040.0000 2.8125 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 741 of 1264 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 742 of 1264 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2405 0.2516 2.2675 4.6600e0030.4887 3.5000e0030.4922 0.1304 3.2500e0030.1336 0.0000 438.0334 438.0334 0.0324 0.0201 444.8223 Unmitigated 0.2405 0.2516 2.2675 4.6600e0030.4887 3.5000e0030.4922 0.1304 3.2500e0030.1336 0.0000 438.0334 438.0334 0.0324 0.0201 444.8223

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352 Hotel 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied i
»
......................................"•
; I
......................................■*
i i i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i i i

Page 743 of 1264 ends

Parking Lot 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 39.8098 39.8098 3.3600e0034.1000e00440.0151 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 40.5167 40.5167 3.4200e0034.1000e00440.7257 NaturalGas
Mitigated

3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 744 of 1264 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 718156 3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 745 of 1264 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 718156 3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 746 of 1264 ends

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 220762 39.1512 3.3000e0034.0000e00439.3531
Parking Lot 7700 1.3656 1.2000e0041.0000e0051.3726
Total 40.5167 3.4200e0034.1000e00440.7257
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 747 of 1264 ends

Use Electric Lawnmower
Use Electric Leafblower
Use Electric Chainsaw

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 216776 38.4442 3.2400e0033.9000e00438.6425
Parking Lot 7700 1.3656 1.2000e0041.0000e0051.3726
Total 39.8098 3.3600e0034.0000e00440.0151
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 748 of 1264 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.1250 1.0000e0059.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6500e0031.6500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.7300e003 Unmitigated 0.1251 1.0000e0051.5700e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.0600e0033.0600e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.2600e003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0143 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.1106 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.4000e0041.0000e0051.5700e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.0600e0033.0600e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.2600e003 Total 0.1251 1.0000e0051.5700e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.0600e0033.0600e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.2600e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 749 of 1264 ends

Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0143 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.1106 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.0000e0051.0000e0059.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6500e0031.6500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.7300e003 Total 0.1250 1.0000e0059.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6500e0031.6500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.7300e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 750 of 1264 ends

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 4.3097 0.0453 1.1000e0035.7702
Unmitigated 5.2603 0.0566 1.3800e0037.0853

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 /

0.178722

0.3521 3.0000e0050.0000 0.3540
Hotel 1.72494 /

0.19166

4.9081 0.0566 1.3700e0036.7313
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 5.2603 0.0566 1.3700e0037.0853
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 751 of 1264 ends

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 /

0.16782

0.3307 3.0000e0050.0000 0.3324
Hotel 1.37995 /

0.179969

3.9790 0.0453 1.1000e0035.4378
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 4.3097 0.0453 1.1000e0035.7702
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 752 of 1264 ends

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 1.8899 0.1117 0.0000 4.6820
Unmitigated 7.5594 0.4468 0.0000 18.7281
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
City Park 0.01 2.0300e0031.2000e0040.0000 5.0300e003 Hotel 37.23 7.5574 0.4466 0.0000 18.7230
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 7.5594 0.4468 0.0000 18.7281
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 753 of 1264 ends

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
City Park 0.0025 5.1000e0043.0000e0050.0000 1.2600e003 Hotel 9.3075 1.8893 0.1117 0.0000 4.6808
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.8899 0.1117 0.0000 4.6820
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 754 of 1264 ends

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 755 of 1264 ends

Avid Hotel
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - per PD
Construction Phase - per AQ Questionnaire
Demolition - Per CalEEMod user's guide and AQ construction questionnaire Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Per Traffic Memo
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD RULE 403 Energy Mitigation - per AQ Operational Questionnaire
Water Mitigation - per AQ Operational questionnaire
Waste Mitigation - AB341

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 55.00 Space 0.49 22,000.00 0
City Park 0.15 Acre 0.15 6,438.17 0
Hotel 68.00 Room 2.27 30,200.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 756 of 1264 ends

Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Mobile Commute Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - Per AQ operational questionnaire

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 196.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 5.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 5.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 6,534.00 6,438.17
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 98,736.00 30,200.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 8.08
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 8.08
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.36 7.99
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied !
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
-4 ■

Page 757 of 1264 ends

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.1702 31.3950 24.3352 0.0585 11.9069 1.2987 13.2056 4.2266 1.2056 5.4322 0.0000 5,812.525 3 5,812.525
3 1.3099 0.2053 5,906.462
6 2024 14.8819 14.4867 17.0677 0.0327 0.3994 0.6029 1.0023 0.1074 0.5798 0.6872 0.0000 3,065.898 5 3,065.898
5 0.4559 0.0348 3,087.675
2 Maximum 14.8819 31.3950 24.3352 0.0585 11.9069 1.2987 13.2056 4.2266 1.2056 5.4322 0.0000 5,812.525 3 5,812.525
3 1.3099 0.2053 5,906.462
6 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.1702 31.3950 24.3352 0.0585 4.7893 1.2987 6.0880 1.6681 1.2056 2.8737 0.0000 5,812.525 3 5,812.525
3 1.3099 0.2053 5,906.462
6 2024 14.8819 14.4867 17.0677 0.0327 0.3994 0.6029 1.0023 0.1074 0.5798 0.6872 0.0000 3,065.898 5 3,065.898
5 0.4559 0.0348 3,087.675
2 Maximum 14.8819 31.3950 24.3352 0.0585 4.7893 1.2987 6.0880 1.6681 1.2056 2.8737 0.0000 5,812.525 3 5,812.525
3 1.3099 0.2053 5,906.462
6 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 758 of 1264 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.84 0.00 50.10 59.03 0.00 41.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 759 of 1264 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.6856 1.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Energy 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mobile 1.3903 1.2755 12.6031 0.0266 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,762.448 7 2,762.448
7 0.1921 0.1167 2,802.020
7 Total 2.0971 1.4685 12.7776 0.0278 2.7602 0.0341 2.7944 0.7352 0.0327 0.7680 2,993.952 2 2,993.952
2 0.1966 0.1209 3,034.901
5 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.6850 6.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Energy 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mobile 1.3903 1.2755 12.6031 0.0266 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,762.448 7 2,762.448
7 0.1921 0.1167 2,802.020
7 Total 2.0965 1.4685 12.7724 0.0278 2.7602 0.0341 2.7944 0.7352 0.0327 0.7680 2,993.939 8 2,993.939
8 0.1966 0.1209 3,034.888
0 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 760 of 1264 ends

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 7/3/2023 7/7/2023 5 5
2 Grading Grading 7/7/2023 7/13/2023 5 5
3 Building Construction Building Construction 7/13/2023 4/11/2024 5 196 4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/11/2024 5/10/2024 5 22 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.03 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 45,300; Non-Residential Outdoor: 15,100; Striped Parking Area: 1,320 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 5
Acres of Paving: 0.49
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 761 of 1264 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 98.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 25.00 10.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 762 of 1264 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.2242 0.0000 4.2242 0.6396 0.0000 0.6396 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 4.2242 0.6766 4.9008 0.6396 0.6328 1.2724 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0425 2.5576 0.6826 0.0115 0.3431 0.0161 0.3592 0.0941 0.0154 0.1095 1,259.613 8 1,259.613
8 0.0694 0.2000 1,320.956
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0416 0.0290 0.4711 1.2900e0030.1453 8.8000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.1000e0040.0393 131.6397 131.6397 3.2800e0033.0000e003132.6157 Total 0.0841 2.5866 1.1537 0.0128 0.4884 0.0170 0.5054 0.1326 0.0162 0.1488 1,391.253 5 1,391.253
5 0.0727 0.2030 1,453.572
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 763 of 1264 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5651 0.0000 1.5651 0.2370 0.0000 0.2370 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 1.5651 0.6766 2.2417 0.2370 0.6328 0.8697 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0425 2.5576 0.6826 0.0115 0.3431 0.0161 0.3592 0.0941 0.0154 0.1095 1,259.613 8 1,259.613
8 0.0694 0.2000 1,320.956
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0416 0.0290 0.4711 1.2900e0030.1453 8.8000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.1000e0040.0393 131.6397 131.6397 3.2800e0033.0000e003132.6157 Total 0.0841 2.5866 1.1537 0.0128 0.4884 0.0170 0.5054 0.1326 0.0162 0.1488 1,391.253 5 1,391.253
5 0.0727 0.2030 1,453.572
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 764 of 1264 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 7.0826 0.6044 7.6869 3.4247 0.5560 3.9807 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0320 0.0223 0.3624 9.9000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 101.2613 101.2613 2.5200e0032.3100e003102.0121 Total 0.0320 0.0223 0.3624 9.9000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 101.2613 101.2613 2.5200e0032.3100e003102.0121 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 765 of 1264 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.6241 0.0000 2.6241 1.2689 0.0000 1.2689 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 2.6241 0.6044 3.2285 1.2689 0.5560 1.8249 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0320 0.0223 0.3624 9.9000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 101.2613 101.2613 2.5200e0032.3100e003102.0121 Total 0.0320 0.0223 0.3624 9.9000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 101.2613 101.2613 2.5200e0032.3100e003102.0121 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 766 of 1264 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0115 0.3838 0.1487 1.8600e0030.0641 1.9300e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8500e0030.0203 200.2825 200.2825 6.7100e0030.0288 209.0311 Worker 0.0801 0.0558 0.9059 2.4700e0030.2794 1.6900e0030.2811 0.0741 1.5500e0030.0757 253.1532 253.1532 6.3000e0035.7700e003255.0302 Total 0.0916 0.4396 1.0546 4.3300e0030.3435 3.6200e0030.3471 0.0926 3.4000e0030.0960 453.4357 453.4357 0.0130 0.0346 464.0613 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 767 of 1264 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0115 0.3838 0.1487 1.8600e0030.0641 1.9300e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8500e0030.0203 200.2825 200.2825 6.7100e0030.0288 209.0311 Worker 0.0801 0.0558 0.9059 2.4700e0030.2794 1.6900e0030.2811 0.0741 1.5500e0030.0757 253.1532 253.1532 6.3000e0035.7700e003255.0302 Total 0.0916 0.4396 1.0546 4.3300e0030.3435 3.6200e0030.3471 0.0926 3.4000e0030.0960 453.4357 453.4357 0.0130 0.0346 464.0613 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 768 of 1264 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0112 0.3846 0.1455 1.8300e0030.0641 1.9400e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8600e0030.0203 197.2746 197.2746 6.7400e0030.0284 205.9040 Worker 0.0746 0.0498 0.8433 2.4000e0030.2794 1.6200e0030.2811 0.0741 1.4900e0030.0756 247.9347 247.9347 5.7000e0035.3700e003249.6763 Total 0.0858 0.4345 0.9888 4.2300e0030.3435 3.5600e0030.3471 0.0926 3.3500e0030.0959 445.2094 445.2094 0.0124 0.0338 455.5803 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 769 of 1264 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0112 0.3846 0.1455 1.8300e0030.0641 1.9400e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8600e0030.0203 197.2746 197.2746 6.7400e0030.0284 205.9040 Worker 0.0746 0.0498 0.8433 2.4000e0030.2794 1.6200e0030.2811 0.0741 1.4900e0030.0756 247.9347 247.9347 5.7000e0035.3700e003249.6763 Total 0.0858 0.4345 0.9888 4.2300e0030.3435 3.5600e0030.3471 0.0926 3.3500e0030.0959 445.2094 445.2094 0.0124 0.0338 455.5803 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 770 of 1264 ends

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 13.0033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 13.1840 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0149 9.9700e0030.1687 4.8000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 49.5870 49.5870 1.1400e0031.0700e00349.9353 Total 0.0149 9.9700e0030.1687 4.8000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 49.5870 49.5870 1.1400e0031.0700e00349.9353 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 771 of 1264 ends

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 13.0033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 13.1840 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0149 9.9700e0030.1687 4.8000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 49.5870 49.5870 1.1400e0031.0700e00349.9353 Total 0.0149 9.9700e0030.1687 4.8000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 49.5870 49.5870 1.1400e0031.0700e00349.9353 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 772 of 1264 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.3903 1.2755 12.6031 0.0266 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,762.448 7 2,762.448
7 0.1921 0.1167 2,802.020
7 Unmitigated 1.3903 1.2755 12.6031 0.0266 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,762.448 7 2,762.448
7 0.1921 0.1167 2,802.020
7 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 543.32 549.44 549.44 1,300,627 1,300,627
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 543.32 549.44 549.44 1,300,627 1,300,627
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1 ..............................................."»
..............................................."■
1

Page 773 of 1264 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 11111 11 1 1 11 1 1 111 1 1 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Page 774 of 1264 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1967.55 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 775 of 1264 ends

Use Electric Lawnmower
Use Electric Leafblower
Use Electric Chainsaw

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1.96755 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 776 of 1264 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.6850 6.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Unmitigated 0.6856 1.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0784 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.6061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.1600e0031.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Total 0.6856 1.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 777 of 1264 ends

Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0784 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.6061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.9000e0046.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Total 0.6850 6.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 778 of 1264 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 779 of 1264 ends

Avid Hotel
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - per PD
Construction Phase - per AQ Questionnaire
Demolition - Per CalEEMod user's guide and AQ construction questionnaire Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Per Traffic Memo
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD RULE 403 Energy Mitigation - per AQ Operational Questionnaire
Water Mitigation - per AQ Operational questionnaire
Waste Mitigation - AB341

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 55.00 Space 0.49 22,000.00 0
City Park 0.15 Acre 0.15 6,438.17 0
Hotel 68.00 Room 2.27 30,200.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 780 of 1264 ends

Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Mobile Commute Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - Per AQ operational questionnaire

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 196.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 5.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 5.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 6,534.00 6,438.17
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 98,736.00 30,200.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 8.08
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 8.08
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.36 7.99
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied !
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
-4 ■

Page 781 of 1264 ends

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.1782 31.5131 24.2374 0.0584 11.9069 1.2987 13.2056 4.2266 1.2057 5.4322 0.0000 5,801.574 3 5,801.574
3 1.3099 0.2059 5,895.682
0 2024 14.8884 14.5110 16.9914 0.0326 0.3994 0.6029 1.0023 0.1074 0.5798 0.6872 0.0000 3,050.578 4 3,050.578
4 0.4560 0.0354 3,072.509
3 Maximum 14.8884 31.5131 24.2374 0.0584 11.9069 1.2987 13.2056 4.2266 1.2057 5.4322 0.0000 5,801.574 3 5,801.574
3 1.3099 0.2059 5,895.682
0 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.1782 31.5131 24.2374 0.0584 4.7893 1.2987 6.0880 1.6681 1.2057 2.8737 0.0000 5,801.574 3 5,801.574
3 1.3099 0.2059 5,895.682
0 2024 14.8884 14.5110 16.9914 0.0326 0.3994 0.6029 1.0023 0.1074 0.5798 0.6872 0.0000 3,050.578 4 3,050.578
4 0.4560 0.0354 3,072.509
3 Maximum 14.8884 31.5131 24.2374 0.0584 4.7893 1.2987 6.0880 1.6681 1.2057 2.8737 0.0000 5,801.574 3 5,801.574
3 1.3099 0.2059 5,895.682
0 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 782 of 1264 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.84 0.00 50.10 59.03 0.00 41.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 783 of 1264 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.6856 1.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Energy 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mobile 1.3590 1.3776 12.4795 0.0255 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,646.381 4 2,646.381
4 0.1992 0.1220 2,687.709
8 Total 2.0658 1.5706 12.6541 0.0267 2.7602 0.0341 2.7944 0.7352 0.0327 0.7680 2,877.884 9 2,877.884
9 0.2038 0.1262 2,920.590
6 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.6850 6.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Energy 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mobile 1.3590 1.3776 12.4795 0.0255 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,646.381 4 2,646.381
4 0.1992 0.1220 2,687.709
8 Total 2.0652 1.5706 12.6488 0.0267 2.7602 0.0341 2.7944 0.7352 0.0327 0.7680 2,877.872 5 2,877.872
5 0.2037 0.1262 2,920.577
1 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 784 of 1264 ends

0.03 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 45,300; Non-Residential Outdoor: 15,100; Striped Parking Area: 1,320 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 5
Acres of Paving: 0.49
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 785 of 1264 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 98.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 25.00 10.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 786 of 1264 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.2242 0.0000 4.2242 0.6396 0.0000 0.6396 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 4.2242 0.6766 4.9008 0.6396 0.6328 1.2724 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0398 2.6704 0.6920 0.0115 0.3431 0.0162 0.3593 0.0941 0.0155 0.1095 1,260.941 5 1,260.941
5 0.0693 0.2002 1,322.345
1 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0447 0.0321 0.4330 1.2200e0030.1453 8.8000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.1000e0040.0393 124.6995 124.6995 3.3200e0033.2000e003125.7376 Total 0.0845 2.7024 1.1250 0.0127 0.4884 0.0171 0.5055 0.1326 0.0163 0.1489 1,385.641 0 1,385.641
0 0.0726 0.2034 1,448.082
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 787 of 1264 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5651 0.0000 1.5651 0.2370 0.0000 0.2370 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 1.5651 0.6766 2.2417 0.2370 0.6328 0.8697 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0398 2.6704 0.6920 0.0115 0.3431 0.0162 0.3593 0.0941 0.0155 0.1095 1,260.941 5 1,260.941
5 0.0693 0.2002 1,322.345
1 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0447 0.0321 0.4330 1.2200e0030.1453 8.8000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.1000e0040.0393 124.6995 124.6995 3.3200e0033.2000e003125.7376 Total 0.0845 2.7024 1.1250 0.0127 0.4884 0.0171 0.5055 0.1326 0.0163 0.1489 1,385.641 0 1,385.641
0 0.0726 0.2034 1,448.082
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 788 of 1264 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 7.0826 0.6044 7.6869 3.4247 0.5560 3.9807 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0344 0.0247 0.3331 9.4000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 95.9227 95.9227 2.5600e0032.4700e00396.7212 Total 0.0344 0.0247 0.3331 9.4000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 95.9227 95.9227 2.5600e0032.4700e00396.7212 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 789 of 1264 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.6241 0.0000 2.6241 1.2689 0.0000 1.2689 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 2.6241 0.6044 3.2285 1.2689 0.5560 1.8249 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0344 0.0247 0.3331 9.4000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 95.9227 95.9227 2.5600e0032.4700e00396.7212 Total 0.0344 0.0247 0.3331 9.4000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 95.9227 95.9227 2.5600e0032.4700e00396.7212 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 790 of 1264 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0111 0.4019 0.1534 1.8600e0030.0641 1.9400e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8600e0030.0203 200.6203 200.6203 6.6800e0030.0289 209.3911 Worker 0.0860 0.0617 0.8327 2.3400e0030.2794 1.6900e0030.2811 0.0741 1.5500e0030.0757 239.8067 239.8067 6.3900e0036.1600e003241.8030 Total 0.0971 0.4635 0.9861 4.2000e0030.3435 3.6300e0030.3471 0.0926 3.4100e0030.0960 440.4270 440.4270 0.0131 0.0350 451.1941 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 791 of 1264 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0111 0.4019 0.1534 1.8600e0030.0641 1.9400e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8600e0030.0203 200.6203 200.6203 6.6800e0030.0289 209.3911 Worker 0.0860 0.0617 0.8327 2.3400e0030.2794 1.6900e0030.2811 0.0741 1.5500e0030.0757 239.8067 239.8067 6.3900e0036.1600e003241.8030 Total 0.0971 0.4635 0.9861 4.2000e0030.3435 3.6300e0030.3471 0.0926 3.4100e0030.0960 440.4270 440.4270 0.0131 0.0350 451.1941 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 792 of 1264 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0108 0.4027 0.1502 1.8300e0030.0641 1.9500e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8700e0030.0203 197.6143 197.6143 6.7100e0030.0285 206.2652 Worker 0.0804 0.0550 0.7758 2.2800e0030.2794 1.6200e0030.2811 0.0741 1.4900e0030.0756 234.8850 234.8850 5.7900e0035.7300e003236.7370 Total 0.0912 0.4577 0.9259 4.1100e0030.3435 3.5700e0030.3471 0.0926 3.3600e0030.0959 432.4993 432.4993 0.0125 0.0342 443.0023 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 793 of 1264 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0108 0.4027 0.1502 1.8300e0030.0641 1.9500e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8700e0030.0203 197.6143 197.6143 6.7100e0030.0285 206.2652 Worker 0.0804 0.0550 0.7758 2.2800e0030.2794 1.6200e0030.2811 0.0741 1.4900e0030.0756 234.8850 234.8850 5.7900e0035.7300e003236.7370 Total 0.0912 0.4577 0.9259 4.1100e0030.3435 3.5700e0030.3471 0.0926 3.3600e0030.0959 432.4993 432.4993 0.0125 0.0342 443.0023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 794 of 1264 ends

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 13.0033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 13.1840 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0161 0.0110 0.1552 4.6000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 46.9770 46.9770 1.1600e0031.1500e00347.3474 Total 0.0161 0.0110 0.1552 4.6000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 46.9770 46.9770 1.1600e0031.1500e00347.3474 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 795 of 1264 ends

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 13.0033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 13.1840 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0161 0.0110 0.1552 4.6000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 46.9770 46.9770 1.1600e0031.1500e00347.3474 Total 0.0161 0.0110 0.1552 4.6000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 46.9770 46.9770 1.1600e0031.1500e00347.3474 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 796 of 1264 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.3590 1.3776 12.4795 0.0255 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,646.381 4 2,646.381
4 0.1992 0.1220 2,687.709
8 Unmitigated 1.3590 1.3776 12.4795 0.0255 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,646.381 4 2,646.381
4 0.1992 0.1220 2,687.709
8 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 543.32 549.44 549.44 1,300,627 1,300,627
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 543.32 549.44 549.44 1,300,627 1,300,627
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1 ..............................................."»
..............................................."■
1

Page 797 of 1264 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Page 798 of 1264 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1967.55 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 799 of 1264 ends

Use Electric Lawnmower
Use Electric Leafblower
Use Electric Chainsaw

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1.96755 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 800 of 1264 ends

0.0784 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.6061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.1600e0031.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Total 0.6856 1.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 801 of 1264 ends

Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0784 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.6061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.9000e0046.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Total 0.6850 6.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 802 of 1264 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 803 of 1264 ends

Avid Hotel Project
Energy Calculations
(kBTU/yr) (Therms) (kWh/yr) (MWh/yr)
City Park 0 0 0 0
Hotel 718,156 7,182 216,776 217
Parking Lot 0 0 7,700 8
Totals 718,156 7,182 224,476 224
1 kBTU = 0.01 therms
Electricity (MWh) 224 65,649,878 0.0003%
Natural Gas (Therms) 7,182 2,936,687,098 0.0002%
Source: Refer to CalEEMod outputs for assumptions used in this analysis.

Energy Type
Riverside County
Energy
Consumption (2020)
Project Annual
Energy
Consumption
Operational Elelctritcy and Naural Gas Consumption
Land Use Natural Gas Use Electricity Use
Percentage Increase
Countywide

Page 804 of 1264 ends

Avid Hotel Project
Energy Calculations
Vehicle Type Percent of Vehicle Trips1 Daily Trips2 Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled Average Fuel
Economy (miles per
gallon)3
Total Annual Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)4
Passenger Cars 0.54 298 705,543 22 32,070
Light/Medium Trucks 0.38 208 492,775 17.3 28,484
Heavy Trucks/Other 0.08 43 102,229 6.4 15,973
TOTAL 6 1.00 549 1,300,627 -- 76,528
County On-Road (Gallons) 3,845,945,898

5. Values may be slightly off due to rounding.

Source: Refer to CalEEMod outputs for assumptions used in this analysis.

Notes:

1. Percent of Vehicle Trip distribution based on trip characteristics within the CalEEMod model.

2. Daily Trips Distribution based on ITE manual.

3. Average fuel economy derived from the Department of Transportation.

4. Total Daily Fuel Consumption calculated by dividing the daily VMT by the average fuel economy (i.e., VMT/Average Fuel Economy).

Page 805 of 1264 ends

Avid Hotel Project
Energy Calculations
Phase Phase Length
(# days) # Worker Trips Worker Trip Length Total VMT Fuel Consumption Factor (Miles/Gallon/Day) Total Fuel Consumption Demolition 5 13 14.7 956 38.37
Grading 5 10 14.7 735 29.51
Building Construction 196 25 14.7 72,030 2,892.44
Architectural Coating 22 5 14.7 1,617 64.93
3,025.26
Phase Phase Length
(# days) # Vendor Trips Vendor Trip Length Total VMT Fuel Consumption Factor (Miles/Gallon/Day) Total Fuel Consumption Demolition 5 0 6.9 - -
Grading 5 0 6.9 - -
Building Construction 196 10 6.9 69 8.27
Architectural Coating 22 0 6.9 - -

8.27 Phase Phase Length
(# days) # Hauling Trips Hauling Trip Length Total VMT Fuel Consumption Factor (Miles/Gallon/Day)1 Total Fuel Consumption
Demolition 5 98 20 1,960 234.90
Grading 5 0 20 - -
Building Construction 196 0 20 - -
Architectural Coating 22 0 20 - -
234.90
TOTAL OFF-SITE MOBILE FUEL (GALLONS) CONSUMED DURING CONSTRUCTION 3,268.43

WORKER TRIPS

VENDOR TRIPS

HAULING TRIPS

24.90284233

8.343886151

Page 806 of 1264 ends

Avid Hotel Project
Energy Calculations
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Consumption Rate (gallons per hour)
Duration (total
hours/day) # days Total Fuel Consumption (gallons)
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 81 0.73 2.3652 8 22 416.28 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.40 3.952 8 22 695.55 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 97 0.37 1.4356 24 22 758.00 Grading Graders 1 8 187 0.41 3.0668 8 20 490.69
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.40 3.952 8 20 632.32 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7 97 0.37 1.4356 14 20 401.97 Building Construction Cranes 1 8 231 0.29 2.6796 8 66 1,414.83 Building Construction Forklifts 2 7 89 0.20 0.712 14 66 657.89 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8 84 0.74 2.4864 8 66 1,312.82 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6 97 0.67 2.5996 6 66 1,029.44 Building Construction Welders 3 8 46 0.45 0.828 24 66 1,311.55 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48 1.4976 6 10 89.86 TOTAL ON-SITE FUEL (GALLONS) CONSUMED DURING CONSTRUCTION 9,211.19 Notes: TOTAL OFF-SITE MOBILE FUEL (GALLONS) CONSUMED DURING CONSTRUCTION 3,268.43 Fuel Consumption Rate = Horsepower x Load Factor x Fuel Consumption Factor TOTAL FUEL (GALLONS) CONSUMED DURING CONSTRUCTION 12,479.61 Where:

Fuel Consumption Factor for a diesel engine is 0.04 gallons per horsepower per hour (gal/hp/hr) and a gasoline engine is 0.06 gal/hp/hr.

Source: Refer to CalEEMod outputs for assumptions used in this analysis.

On-Site Construction Fuel Consumption

Page 807 of 1264 ends

APPENDIX B
Cultural Resources Identification Memorandum

Page 808 of 1264 ends

September 9, 2022
Brian Lee, Community Development Director

CITY OF COVINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
125 East College Street
Covina, CA 91723
RE: CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION MEMORANDUM FOR

THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, CITY OF COVINA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Lee:

In support of the Avid Hotel Project (project), Michael Baker International completed a cultural resources identification and evaluation study, which includes a South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) records search; literature, historical map, and aerial photo review; local historical society consultation; pedestrian survey; archaeological buried site sensitivity analysis; and evaluation of the property for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) and for designation as a City of Covina historic landmark or structure of merit. These efforts were completed to determine whether the project could result in significant impacts to historical and archaeological resources as defined by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15064.5. Methods, results, and recommendations are summarized below.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project consists of building demolition, site preparation, and construction of a new hotel. The hotel building would contain a total of 68 guest rooms. Vehicular access is proposed from a driveway along Azusa Avenue and a driveway along Glentana Street. The project is anticipated to require removal of soil and materials of 5 to 6 feet below existing grade. The project will also include the installation a drywell infiltration system that will reach a depth of 40 feet below grade which is the maximum depth of ground distrubance. .

PROJECT LOCATION
The project is located at the adjacent addresses of 578-580 North Azusa Avenue and 865-867 West Glentana Street, both in Covina, Los Angeles County, California. The project is in Township 1 South, Range 10 West, Section 14 of the US Geologic Service Baldwin Park, Calif. 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map (see Attachment 1 - Figures). The project area totals 0.85 acres within two adjacent parcels Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 8432-006-015 and 8432-006-017.

APN 8432-006-017 has two extant buildings and APN 8432-006-015 is vacant.

Michael Baker

INTERNATIONAL
We Make a Difference
MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 809 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 2 ends

NATURAL SETTING
The project area is within the northwest portion of the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province.

The Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province is distinguished by northwest-trending mountain ranges and valleys following faults branching from the San Andreas Fault. The Peninsular Ranges are bound to the east by the Colorado Desert and extend north to the San Bernardino–Riverside county line, west into the submarine continental shelf, and south into Baja California (Norris and Webb 1976). The City of Covina is located in the northeastern San Gabriel Basin and is bounded by the San Jose Hills to the southeast. Geologically, the project area is situated upon surficial sediments of alluvial gravel, sand, and silt (Qa) (Dibblee and Ehrenspeck 1999). Soil survey data indicates that the entire project area is composed primarily of urban land composed of the Palmview-Tujunga soils series complex. These two soil series are deep to very deep, well-drained soils that formed in alluvial fans from granitic or related rock sources which have slopes between 0 to 15 percent (NRCS 2022).

The project area is located within the San Gabriel Valley, which is bordered by the San Gabriel Mountains on the north, the San Jose Hills on the east, the San Rafael Hills on the west, and the Puente Hills on the south. The elevation is approximately 495 feet above mean sea level. The project area is heavily urbanized and is located within the Los Angeles Plain ecoregion. Moist and cool marine air greatly moderates temperatures and rainfall in the Los Angeles Plain with annual precipitation ranging from 10 to 17 inches. The ecoregion is nearly level with flat floodplains and terraces and very gently to gently sloping alluvial fans. The soil temperature regime is thermic.

Hydrology has been greatly modified and channelized. The San Gabriel River drains the San Gabriel Valley and Mountains (Griffith et al. 2016).

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION METHODS
The methods and results of the SCCIC records search, literature, historical map, aerial photo review, local historical society consultation, pedestrian survey, archaeological sensitivity analysis, and California Register evaluation are presented below.

SOUTH CENTRAL COASTAL INFORMATION CENTER
SCCIC staff conducted a cultural resource records search (File No. 23619.9708) of the project area and a half-mile area around it on April 18, 2022 (Attachment 2). The SCCIC at California State University, Fullerton, is part of the California Historical Resources Information System, an affiliate of the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). The SCCIC is the official state repository of cultural resources records and reports for Los Angeles County. As part of the records search and background research, the following federal and California inventories were reviewed:
• National Register of Historic Places (National Register) (National Park Service 2022). • California Inventory of Historic Resources (OHP 1976). • California Points of Historical Interest (OHP 1992 and updates).

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 810 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 3 ends

• California Historical Landmarks (OHP 1996).
• Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility (OHP 2012) for Los Angeles County. • Built Environment Resources Directory for Los Angeles County (OHP 2022a). • California Historical Resources listing (OHP 2022b).

Results
No cultural resources studies have been previously completed within the project area; one has been completed within a half-mile, as summarized below.

Report
No.

Author(s) Date Report Title Identified Cultural
Resources in Project
Area?
LA10641Tang, Bai
Tom
2010 Preliminary Historical/Archaeological Resources
Study, San Bernardino Line Positive Train Control
Project, Southern California Regional Rail Authority,
Counties of Los Angeles and San Bernardino.

No
No cultural resources were identified within the project area; one was identified within the halfmile search distance of the project area as described below:

Primary/
Trinomial No.

Address Type/Name Eligibility Status Proximity to
Project Site
P-19-187085 N/A Historic era road/
Mojave Road
A segment has been designated
California Historical Landmark
No. 963, while another segment
was recommended ineligible for
the National Register and
California Register.

Within 0.2
miles

LITERATURE, HISTORICAL MAP, AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW Michael Baker staff reviewed historical maps and aerial photographs for historical information about the project area and the vicinity. Below is a list of maps and photographs reviewed followed by a narrative description of the results:
• Survey Plat Map of Township No. 1 South, Range No. 10 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian (BLM 1865, 1869, 1877)
• Covina, California Sanborn Map, 1911 (Sanborn Map Company 1911) • Covina, California Sanborn Map, 1929, revised 1932 (Sanborn Map Company 1929) • Pomona, Calif. 1:62,500 scale topographic quadrangle map (USGS 1897) • Puente, Calif. 1:24,000 scale topographic quadrangle map (USGS 1927) MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 811 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 4 ends

• Aerial photograph: Flight C-300, Frame I-123 (UCSB 1928) • Aerial photograph: Flight C-13990, Frame 1-117X (UCSB 1949) • Aerial photograph: Flight AXJ-1952, Frame 19K-163 (UCSB 1954) • Aerial photograph: Flight C-23870, Frame 1054 (UCSB 1960) • Aerial photograph: Flight TG-2400, Frame 1-230 (UCSB 1968) Results
In eastern Los Angeles County, where the project is located, archaeology sites have demonstrated traits of both coastal and inland desert cultural traditions. Models of California prehistory hypothesize that its first inhabitants were big game-hunting Paleoindians who lived at the close of the last Ice Age (~11,000 years before present [BP] through the early Holocene 7,600 BP). As the environment warmed and dried, Ice Age megafauna died out, requiring adaption to local resources by groups to survive. The coastal manifestation is the San Dieguito Complex and within a lifeway known as the Paleocoastal Tradition, whereas further inland this lifeway is known as the Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition (Moratto 1984). Along the coast, rising sea levels created bays and estuaries and groups adopted marine subsistence, including fish and shellfish. These resulting shell middens contain flaked cobble tools, metates, manos, discoidals, and flexed burials and indicate a semi-sedentary lifestyle (Byrd and Raab 2007). In contrast, the Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition is generally identified by an advanced flaked-stone industry of foliate, lanceolate, and long-stemmed bifaces. People hunted diverse animal species and collected a wide number of plants from diverse ecozones, but this period lacks widespread evidence of milling stones.

Therefore, hard seed processing was likely not widely practiced and inland populations were more mobile than coastal populations (Moratto 1984). The inland tradition may continue as late as 7,000 BP (Warren and Crabtree 1986).

The middle Holocene (7,600–3,650 BP) is a time of change and transition. As conditions continued to warm and dry, lakes and streams in the desert disappeared. This resulted in a shift in subsistence strategies, namely a shift to the gathering of plant seeds, grasses, and shellfish along the coast as the primary dietary staple. This shift in subsistence is what Wallace (1955) named the Millingstone Horizon. Characteristics of the middle Holocene sites include ground stone artifacts (manos and metates) used for processing plant material and shellfish, flexed burial beneath rock or milling stone cairns, flaked core or cobble tools, dart points, cogstones, discoidals, and crescentics. Large habitations are seen in the inland areas and considerable variability of site size and population are seen along the coasts.

Characteristics of the late Holocene (3,650–233 BP) include the increased dependence on mortar and pestle for food processing, including the acorn, a change to more complex and elaborate mortuary behaviors, and the introduction of the bow and arrow and ceramic technologies toward the end of the late Holocene. Marine resource exploitation proliferated and diversified. The climate fluctuated with periods of drought alternating with cooler and moister periods (Vellanoweth and Grenda 2002; Byrd and Raab 2007; Jones et al. 2004). These fluctuations resulted MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 812 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 5 ends

in dynamic regional cultural patterns with considerable local variation. Settlement strategies shifted toward permanent settlement during this period.

The project area is located within the ethnographic territory of the Gabrielino Indians approximately equidistant between the ethnographic placenames: Weniinga, located approximately 3 miles south, and Ashuukshanga, located approximately 3 miles north (McCawley 1996). The Gabrielino are Takic speakers and are descended from Late Prehistoric populations of the region. The name Gabrielino was given to the local inhabitants by Spanish missionaries who established a mission in Gabrieleno territory in 1771. Important food resources would have been acorns, agave, wild seeds and nuts, hunting game, and fishing. Due to Spanish subjugation and absorption into the mission system, the Gabrielinos’ political structure, social organization, and cultural practices were heavily impacted. Gabrielino villages were generally self-contained and had an autonomous political structure comprising non-localized lineages, in which the largest and dominant lineage’s leader was usually the village chief. Village houses were domed, circularshaped structures, constructed from tree branches and thatched with tule, fern, or carrizo. The villages would have been located near fresh water and raw material resources. Villagers would have utilized temporary camps throughout their localized territories for hunting, gathering, and raw material trips away from the main village (Bean and Shipek 1978).

The early Bureau of Land Management General Land Office survey plat depicts the project area as located due north of the lands of Rancho La Puente, although no details were mapped for the area (BLM 1865, 1869, 1877). By the late 1800s, the Southern Pacific Railroad Covina Branch traversed the area in an east-west direction approximately 500 feet north of the project area (USGS 1897). The project area was in a rural area outside of the Covina city limits in the early 1900s (Sanborn Map Company 1911, 1929). The extensive fruit-growing industry led to the development of several fruit packing houses flanking the Southern Pacific Railroad near Azusa Avenue by the 1920s (Sanborn Map Company 1929; UCSB 1928). It appears that present-day Glentana Street follows the alignment of what was a long residential driveway leading to a residence set back from Azusa Avenue (USGS 1927). The project area and surrounding vicinity consisted of orchard land dotted with single-family residences through the 1940s (UCSB 1949).

By the mid-1950s, the orchard rows in the project area were partially cleared, and at least one— possibly two—buildings were located on the site. These appear to have been single-family residences that had driveways branching off the aforementioned longer drive. Much of the surrounding orchard land to the north, east, and southeast had been replaced by residential tracts by this time (UCSB 1954).

Within a few years, the area had dramatically changed and the majority of the orchards had been lost to residential and commercial development. In 1960, Northview High School was under construction across Azusa Avenue to the northwest of the project area. Glentana Street was developed into a public street in place of the previously existing residential drive. One building had been constructed at 835 Glentana Street, but the remainder of the block west to Azusa MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 813 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 6 ends

Avenue, including the project area, was undeveloped, except for the north-south alley through the project area (UCSB 1960). The extant buildings in the western portion of the project area were constructed in 1963 (Los Angeles County Assessor 2022). Additional development occurred in the immediately surrounding area during the 1960s, including the construction of the multifamily buildings at the eastern end of Glentana Street and commercial buildings along Front Street to the north (UCSB 1968).

LOCAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY CONSULTATION
On March 31, 2022, Michael Baker International mailed a letter and figures describing the project to the Covina Valley Historical Society. The letter requested information or concerns regarding historical resources within the project area (Attachment 3). A follow-up call to the Covina Valley Historical Society was completed on April 19, 2022, at which time curator Rosemarie Lippman stated she did not know of any historical resources in the area of the project. She stated Michael Baker International could send her a copy of the letter via email and she would distribute it to other historical society staff for input. Michael Baker International emailed the letter and figures to Ms. Lippman the same day.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT SURVEY
On April 7, 2022, Michael Baker International cross-trained archaeologist/built environment technician Marcel Young conducted a pedestrian survey of the project area. The exposed ground surface was walked over in single transects spaced approximately 10 meters apart. The slope of the survey was flat with approximately 15 percent ground visibility due to development.

Disturbances include landscaping, grading, bioturbation, human habitation/camping, and modern refuse dumping. The majority of exposed ground surface was located on the east half of the project area in APN 8432-006-015. No cultural materials or anthropogenic soils were identified within the project area during the survey.

Mr. Young also examined the two existing buildings in the project area and noted their current condition, construction, materials, and visible alterations. Documentation included photographs and field notes. A development history, description, and photographs of the property addressed as 578-580 North Azusa Avenue are included in the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 series forms in Attachment 4.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL BURIED SITE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Sensitivity for cultural resources consisting of archaeological sites is considered low based upon no known cultural resources, various natural factors, and the previous disturbance in the project area. The SCCIC records search results and the field survey identified no cultural resources within the project area and only one historic-period resource, the Mojave Road (P-19-187085), was identified within a half-mile of the project area. The project area is located approximately 0.61 miles south of San Dimas Wash. Proximity to water, a critical resource, is significant and this distance from water indicates a lower sensitivity to prehistoric occupation. While the project is MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 814 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 7 ends

underlain by Holocene-age young alluvium (11,700 years ago to today), the soil has been heavily disturbed by modern development and is urban land according to soil mapping. According to the historical map review, the project area was first developed in the 1920s as an orchard with several buildings on the property starting in 1962.

CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION
The criteria for eligibility in the California Register are based on the National Register of Historic Places. To be eligible for listing in the California Register, a property must be at least 50 years of age (resources less than 50 years of age may be eligible if they can demonstrate that sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance) and possess significance at the local, state, or national level, under one or more of the following criteria:

Criterion 1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; Criterion 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; Criterion 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic value;
Criterion 4. It has yielded, or may yield, information important in history or prehistory.

In addition to meeting a significance criterion, a property must also have integrity or the ability to convey its significance under a majority of the seven aspects of integrity, which are location, design, materials, workmanship, setting, feeling, and association.

Below is the California Register evaluation for 578-580 North Azusa Avenue. The full historic context, evaluation, and photographs are located in Attachment 4.

Criterion 1 – Constructed in 1962, the buildings on the property were originally a combination of residential and office space. They were used as model homes and offices for a real estate development company which was not particularly productive or successful. Archival research did not indicate the property is associated with any significant events or trends in national, state, regional, or local history. While it is generally associated with post-World War II residential and commercial development, the property did not play an important role in the history of residential or commercial development in Covina and is not significant within those contexts. Thus, it is recommended ineligible under Criterion 1.

Criterion 2 – Archival research did not demonstrate that commercial property is associated with individuals who have made significant contributions to national, state, or local history. Therefore, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 2.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 815 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 8 ends

Criterion 3 – The two buildings fronting Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street were built in a Modern Ranch style, and feature long footprints, low horizontal massing, variation in elevation bays, stucco cladding, stone and brick veneer, and low-pitched hipped and Dutch gable roofs. However, they are not outstanding or high-style examples of Modern Ranch homes. The buildings are also not good examples of residential construction because they were constructed to be used as both residential and office spaces. In addition, the two buildings exhibit alterations. For example, the incongruous roof style at the location where the two buildings meet suggests the buildings may have been separate at one time, and appear to have been bridged by that section clad with rock veneer. 865-867 Glentana Street’s appearance has been notably changed by the replacement of its original wood shake roof with two different types of non-original roof tile, one of which is Spanish in style.

Additionally, the smaller ancillary building at the rear of the property does not have any stylistic features and is not representative of any particular architectural style. The buildings were not designed or built by a master architect or builder. They do not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, nor do they represent the work of a master or possess high artistic values. Thus, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 3.

Criterion 4 – National Park Service guidance for the equivalent National Register Criterion D states that certain important research questions about human history can only be answered by the actual physical material of cultural resources. The buildings do not meet the two requirements identified for eligibility under Criterion 4. The buildings on the subject property have not been used as a source of data and do not contain more, as yet unretrieved data. The buildings have not been determined, through testing or research, to be a likely source of data. Therefore, they are recommended ineligible under California Register Criterion 4, as they have not yielded and do not have the potential to yield information important to our understanding of prehistory or history of the local area, state, or nation.

COVINA HISTORIC LANDMARK/STRUCTURE OF MERIT EVALUATION
Covina Municipal Code Title 17, Chapter 17.81 states the following criteria shall be used by the planning commission and city council in designating any property as a historic landmark or structure of merit:

Criterion 1. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, architectural or natural history; or Criterion 2. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history; or
Criterion 3. It represents the work of a notable builder, designer, or architect; or MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 816 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 9 ends

Criterion 4. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or
Criterion 5. It contributes to the significance of an historic area, being a geographically definable area possessing a concentration of historic or scenic properties or thematically related grouping of properties which contribute to each other and are unified aesthetically by plan or physical development; or
Criterion 6. It is one of the few remaining examples in the city of Covina, region, state, or nation possessing distinguishing characteristics of an architectural or historic type or specimen.

Below is the Covina Municipal Code evaluation for 578-580 North Azusa Avenue. The full historic context, evaluation, and photographs are located in Attachment 4.

Criterion 1 – The buildings on the property were constructed to serve a combined use of model homes and office space for a real estate development company. Archival research did not indicate the property exemplifies or reflects special elements of Covina’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, architectural, or natural history. No associations with important events or trends within the above themes were identified. Therefore, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 1.

Criterion 2 – As discussed above, archival research did not indicate the property is associated with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history. Thus, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 2.

Criterion 3 – The buildings on the property were constructed by a real estate development company that was not particularly productive or successful. The buildings were not architectdesigned; thus, they do not represent the work of a notable architect, designer, or builder. The property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 3.

Criterion 4 – None of the buildings on the property embody distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or are valuable examples of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship. The two primary buildings fronting Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street were built in a Modern Ranch style, and feature long footprints, low horizontal massing, variation in elevation bays, stucco cladding, stone and brick veneer, and low-pitched hipped and Dutch gable roofs. However, they are not outstanding or high-style examples of Modern Ranch style homes. The buildings are also not good examples of residential construction because they were constructed to be used as both residential and office spaces. In addition, the two buildings exhibit alterations. For example, the incongruous roof style at the location where the two buildings meet suggests the buildings may have been separate at one time, and appear to have been bridged by that section clad with rock veneer. 865-867 Glentana Street’s appearance has been notably MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 817 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 10 ends

changed by the replacement of its original wood shake roof with two different types of nonoriginal roof tile, one of which is Spanish in style. Lastly, the smaller ancillary building at the rear of the property does not have any stylistic features and is not representative of any particular architectural style. The property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 4.

Criterion 5 – The subject property does not contribute to the significance of a geographically definable historic area with a concentration of historic or scenic properties, or a thematically related grouping of properties which contribute to each other and are unified aesthetically by plan or physical development.

Criterion 6 – The subject property is not one of a few remaining examples of an architectural or historic type or specimen in Covina, the state, or the nation.

In summary, the property does not appear to meet any of the criteria for designation as a Covina Historic Landmark or Structure of Merit.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
No historical or archaeological resources as defined by CEQA Section 15064.5(a) or Covina Municipal Code Title 17, Chapter 17.81 were identified within the project area as a result of the SCCIC records search; literature, map, and aerial photo review; historical society consultation; pedestrian survey; and California and City Register evaluations. Sensitivity for buried archaeological resources is low. There is a low potential for disturbing previously unknown archaeological resources during ground-disturbing activities associated with project construction.

Impacts will be avoided through the implementation of the below mitigation measures for the inadvertent discovery of archaeological cultural resources or human remains.

Archaeological Resources Inadvertent Discovery. In the event that cultural resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities must be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet must be established around the find where construction activities cannot be allowed to continue until a qualified archaeologist examines the newly discovered resource(s) and evaluates the area of the find. Work may be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities must be evaluated by a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards. If the resource appears to be significant, the qualified professional archaeologist, working under the direction of the lead agency and in coordination with Native American tribes and/or other stakeholders, will prepare an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource(s) along with subsequent laboratory processing, analysis, and curation.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 818 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 11 ends

Human Remains Inadvertent Discovery. If human remains are discovered during construction, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to the provisions of Section 27491 of the Government Code, or any successor statute, or any other related provisions of law concerning the investigation of the circumstances, manner and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or their authorized representative, in the manner provided in Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code, or any successor statute. The coroner shall make his or her determination within two working days from the time the person responsible for the excavation or his or her authorized representative notifies the coroner of the discovery or recognition of the human remains. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission and the Covina Building Official.

Applicable state and federal laws include California Health and Safety Code Sections 7050.5–7055 and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code.

PREPARER QUALIFICATIONS
This report was prepared by Michael Baker International Senior Archaeologist and Principal Investigator Nicholas F. Hearth, MA, Senior Architectural Historian Susan Zamudio Gurrola, MHP, and Archaeologist Jacob Parsley, BA. Archaeologist Marcel Young, BA, completed the pedestrian survey. This report was reviewed for quality assurance and quality control by Senior Associate and Department Manager Margo Nayyar, MA.

Mr. Hearth has worked as an archaeologist in cultural resource management since 2002. He meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for prehistoric archaeology.

He received his BA in anthropology in 2003 from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and his MA in anthropology in 2006 from the University of California, Riverside. Mr. Hearth has worked in California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and multiple states both in the Midwest and New England. Mr. Hearth is well versed in applying Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), CEQA, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on various projects across many market sectors. He has completed projects in all phases of archaeology: Phase I pedestrian and shovel test surveys, extended Phase I survey, buried site testing, archaeological sensitivity assessments, Phase II testing and evaluations, Phase III data recovery, and Phase IV monitoring. His project responsibilities include overseeing archaeological, historical, and paleontological studies, directing all phases of archaeological field and laboratory work, and ensuring that the quality of analysis and reporting meets or exceeds appropriate local, state, and federal standards.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 819 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 12 ends

Ms. Zamudio-Gurrola is an architectural historian with over nine years of experience in cultural resource management. Her experience includes conducting archival research and built environment surveys, conducting evaluations for the National and California Registers and local designations, assessing the integrity of historic resources, developing historic context statements, reviewing projects for conformance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, and preparing cultural resources studies in compliance with CEQA, NEPA, Section 106 of the NHPA, and local ordinances. She also prepares cultural resources sections for CEQA environmental documents such as initial studies and environmental impact reports and has demonstrated experience preparing Caltrans-format cultural resources studies, finding of effect documents, and Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record documentation for buildings and structures. Ms. Zamudio-Gurrola meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for history and architectural history.

Mr. Parsley has worked in various capacities in cultural resource management since 2018. He is experienced in surveying, monitoring, and writing cultural resources constraints reports within the frameworks of Section 106 of the NHPA, NEPA, and CEQA. He has participated in projects in several phases of archaeology: Phase I pedestrian and shovel test surveys, buried site testing, Phase III data recovery, and Phase IV monitoring. His project highlights include archaeological surveying to update and verify cultural resources found mostly in remote areas of California, many of which have included prehistoric components. Other project responsibilities include identifying and flagging historic and prehistoric resources, delineating best access routes, conducting postimpact assessments, and reporting to the National Park Service, National Forest System, Pacific Gas and Electric, and private clients.

Mr. Young has worked in various capacities in cultural resource management since 2013. He is experienced in surveying and conducting recording and evaluations of historic and prehistoric archaeological sites in California. Mr. Young is versed in conducting fieldwork within frameworks of Section 106 of the NHPA, NEPA, and CEQA. He has participated in projects in several phases of archaeology: Phase I pedestrian, extended Phase I testing, shovel test surveys, buried site testing, Phase III data recovery, and monitoring.

Ms. Nayyar is a senior cultural resources manager with 12 years of experience in California, Nevada, Arizona, Idaho, Texas, and Mississippi. Her experience includes built environment surveys, evaluation of historic-era resources using guidelines outlined in the National and California Registers, and preparation of cultural resources technical studies pursuant to CEQA and Section 106 of the NHPA, including identification studies, finding of effect documents, memorandum of agreements, programmatic agreements, and Historic American Buildings Survey, Historic American Engineering Record, and Historic American Landscapes Survey mitigation documentation. She prepares cultural resources environmental document sections for CEQA environmental documents, including infill checklists, initial studies, environmental impact reports, and NEPA environmental documents such as environmental impact statements. She also specializes in municipal preservation planning, historic preservation ordinance updates, Native MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 820 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 13 ends

American consultation, and provision of Certified Local Government training to interested local governments. She develops Survey 123 and Esri Collector applications for large-scale historic resources surveys and authors National Register nomination packets. Ms. Nayyar meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for history and architectural history.

Sincerely,
Attachments:

Attachment 1 – Figures
Attachment 2 – Cultural Resource Records Search Results Attachment 3 – Local Historical Society Consultation
Attachment 4 – DPR 523 series forms
Nicholas Hearth, MA, RPA
Senior Archaeologist
Susan Zamudio-Gurrola, MHP
Senior Architectural Historian Jacob Parsley, BA
Archaeologist
MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 821 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 14 ends

REFERENCES
Bean, Lowell J., and Florence C. Shipek. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In California, edited by Robert F.

Heizer, 538-549. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

BLM (Bureau of Land Management General Land Office). 1865. Map of Township No. 1 South, Range No. 10 West, San Bernardino Meridian.
https://glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx.
———. 1869. Map of Township No. 1 South, Range No. 10 West, San Bernardino Meridian. https://glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx.
———. 1877. Map of Township No. 1 South, Range No. 10 West, San Bernardino Meridian. https://glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx.

Byrd, Brian F. and L. Mark Raab. 2007. "Prehistory of the Southern Bight: Models for a New Millennium." In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, 215–227. New York: AltaMira Press.

Dibblee, Thomas W, and Helmut E. Ehrenspeck. 1999. Geologic map of the El Monte and Baldwin Park quadrangles, Los Angeles County, California. Dibblee Foundation Map DF-69, 1:24,000. Santa Barbara, California: Dibblee Geological Foundation.

Griffith, Glenn E., James M. Omernik, David W. Smith, Terry D. Cook, Ed Tallyn, Kendra Moseley, and Colleen B. Johnson. 2016. Ecoregions of California. Ecoregion map, 1:1,100,000.

Washington DC. US Geological Open-File Report 2016-1021.

Jones, Terry L., Gary M. Brown, L. Mark Raab, Janet L. McVickar, W. Geoffrey Spaulding, Douglas M. Kennett, Andrew York, and Phillip L. Walker. 2004. "Environmental Imperatives Reconsidered: Demographic Crises in Western North America During the Medieval Climatic Anomaly." Prehistoric California: Archaeology and the Myth of Paradise. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Los Angeles County Assessors Office. 2022. Accessed May 2022. https://assessor.lacounty.gov/homeowners/property-search.

McCawley, William. 1996. The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Banning, CA:

Malki Museum Press.

Moratto, Michael J. 1984. California Archaeology. San Diego: Academic Press.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 822 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 15 ends

National Park Service. 2022. “National Register Database and Research.” Accessed April 1, 2022. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/database-research.htm.

Norris, Robert M., and Robert W. Webb. 1976. Geology of California. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2022. Web-based soil mapping interface.

Accessed May 2022. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.

OHP (California Office of Historic Preservation). 1976. California Inventory of Historic Resources.

On file with the SCCIC.
———. 1992. California Points of Historical Interest. Sacramento: California Department of Parks and Recreation.
———. 1996. California Historical Landmarks. Sacramento: California Department of Parks and Recreation.
———. 2012. Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility for Los Angeles County. On file with the SCCIC.
———. 2022a. Built Environment Resources Directory for Los Angeles County. Accessed May 2022. https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=30338.
———. 2022b. “California Historical Resources.”
https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/ListedResources/?view=county&criteria=19 Sanborn Map Company. 1911. Covina map, sheet 1. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://lacountylibrary.org/database/.
———. 1929. Covina map, sheet 17. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://lacountylibrary.org/database/.

UCSB (University of California, Santa Barbara Library). 1928. “Flight C-300, Frame I-123.” Aerial photograph. Accessed May 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder. _______. 1949. “Flight C-13990, Frame 1-117X.” Aerial photograph. Accessed May 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.
_______. 1954. “Flight AXJ-1952, Frame 19K-163.” Aerial photograph. Accessed May 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 823 of 1264 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 16 ends

_______. 1960. “Flight C-23870, Frame 1054.” Aerial photograph. Accessed May 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.
_______. 1968. “Flight TG-2400, Frame 1-230.” Aerial photograph. Accessed May 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.

USGS (US Geological Survey). 1897. Pomona, Calif. 1:62,500 scale topographic quadrangle map.

Reston, VA: US Department of the Interior.
_______. 1927. Puente, Calif. 1:24,000 scale topographic quadrangle. Accessed May 2022. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ht-bin/tv_browse.pl?id= 50316982b524b5b4e3dbf7901dcda5d8 Vellanoweth, René L. and Donn R. Grenda. 2002. "Paradise or Purgatory: Environments, Past and Present." In Islanders and Mainlanders: Prehistoric Context for the Southern California Bight, edited by Jeffrey H. Altschul and Donn R. Grenda 67–84. Tucson, Arizona: SRI Press.

Wallace, William. 1955. “A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 2:214-230.

Warren, Claude N. and Robert H. Crabtree. 1986. “Prehistory of the Southwestern Area.” In Great Basin, edited by Warren L. D’Azevedo, 183-193. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 11, William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 824 of 1264 ends

Attachment 1
Figures

Page 825 of 1264 ends

Regional Vicinity
Figure 1

AVID HOTEL PROJECT

COVINA, CA
Source: Esri, ArcGIS Online, National Geographic World Map: Covina, California Project Location
¯
0 2.5 5 10
Miles
Los Angeles
County
Map Detail
PN: 188785
&
I N J
N T A 2171 m

PLEASANT

VIEW RID GE
MAGIC

MOUNTAIN
MAGIC

MOUNTAIN
\
0 Ta tuts
La Canada
,^lintridge
Altaden#a
- c<t£ W
^FALLS*
CANYON
Foothill F
Pasadena
w
SAN
GABRIEL '■

SAN A GABRIEL
r^A
Vl
n
t
L
V
Sierra Madre SA’f
Monrovia
Duarte Glendora .Azusa •
•^C able Airport Foot!
Claremont Upland Rancfio
Cucamonga
S^p Dimas
La Verne*
Brackett FlifT
Arcadia1

SM ,J ILL
South Pasadena. *San Marino
<^Al. 1 Temple City* _
Alhambra. .San Gabriel ^
Rosemead rfe.Mon* Lva 6a|dwin^
^1 Monte *west Covina
Monterey Park
South EI*Monte
jz&f'. X i a n Jes 3
•East Los <A La Puente ... .

Angeles Montebello - e Walnyt
A^nty u . ,
U»»w.00<l . ^ Chino H,1I
J J PkA Rivera .Whittier Rowland *«—«•»
Heights
t / axk// r
, t ~r \(f7
Maywood
^ 6 ell
Bell Gardens’
outh Gate Cudahy Springs
Lynwood Downey
W T''
Ontario
Montclair “Fontario Ir
Pomona
Chino* .d>4re\
Edison Ave
-lie <
o ^ *Chino Airport
X’ Sj. T
SantaFe South Whittier
.. e* *0^ V , ' rf' -■ 4
II ■ Y... \ _ l A CMINO £Vv CHIN
' . »Brea Hin v A L l LaM,rada A LI
.Compton Norwalk \ Yorba Linda MmiAir„ «*f
VT Paraftiount ^e||flower
i
La Mirada *
Brea
__ |
Fullerton
Jiiun. a.,port x .Placentia
Artesia* Buena Park* Fullerton
Lakewood* *Cerritos
La Palma
/ ffr ‘ * r II 7'(pikauawus
Long Beach Xawaiian Gardens 57
^ A'?"* Cyfrress
Corona*
Cypress
Los Alarqitos ,r , ...

Stanton Anaheim Lo^Alaftlms Aati.X //1
★
Michael Baker

INTERNATIONAL

Page 826 of 1264 ends

Project Vicinity
Figure 2

AVID HOTEL PROJECT

COVINA, CA
Source: Esri, ArcGIS Online, USGS 7.5-Minute topographic quadrangle maps: Covina, California PN: 188785
Project Area
¯
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Baldwin Park Quad
Baldwin Park Quad
5Tvr
*7VT
mm
fit III1
** l*___ a
■ I
■ rr“«Tr^ • i
ncW&u*
"Spreadinj^JL
r^U0- OV<yOn<Js. ;/
si Valley i
inrtanuml
Valle
fait* JL£322fi£fi££=^»i',
•a^ lr^ ~_LL
umiiiumig I mm ?RO »0<r
i : 4IJ.1 !■■ /wuiu1
*wf i 'a M ill KB c—
a % L .T *
==
rfMg
NA
l!cy
■ >...... Sch /
.v • It-3
HS
rJL, j- » ••.»••*• n
, !»•■**• C
*/7 ff A Valencia
w Sch
:

Hoileo
\ i 5: : P»»t
4* •;o<
*c/z
I' V
i •!) i2JL3*§"-«vi
.
*•5 AMflUN
iilPOSs^sr •—1 T --S
, SSTJ f
w&L
j i
* i
i
’ 5
1 ' ■.., SI
/ " «& :h^ e v
lJl2
8M
tTTV^ ss
P S
fe3
- -f
-• z
r-v h o
HH
[NOrllTMW ^
H;gh S<h ' a r~!
“ hr-rf?P. *»■■■ ‘~WF{i
Pj K
old
p'l ifll ^* S<h 1
Or Sch
! ic^-
IJS A i 7J1 Coy
^w^»*hi n« Bb> r
r^*
1 ryOff*
HOC# 11; asr rj “ j*!4
*
2 JL] ii ■ a^*Tl ••■ ho5ea u
PC'
MS 5 7- BN 84O/Li0» V
iewwbIlb . 4-
cov
3unV»t
H
'ttuTt L*r '
koy.'&j
v—«=
I
U< V
sor
• 5' Of* VE Ml
M =3 Park -----------i
JLEB a*
[Covina
HS
sdb^r ?>
gS*lAH*W 1
HI Mm A ve M M
=-f °T‘* cfl- ] >
gjnt 7
t □□ &rkjfA
5 ,DD
I
S ii &
3ttW
:
:
c a f
BDY Bv
V
43’
vihcen
■
uu Ko isnuQ fAeewXy LAM S>JAy BERN A
i*;. n»*B -
c»
*.•
i nx^ /
vr>
'
Michael Baker

Page 827 of 1264 ends

Project Area
Figure 3

AVID HOTEL PROJECT

COVINA, CA
Source: Esri, ArcGIS Online, 2021 Nearmap Imagery: Covina, California W Front St
Glentana St
N Azusa Ave
N Azusa Ave
PN: 188785
Project Area
¯
0 50 100 200
Feet
39 39
«! I
*
P
•»
-
. B
w Front St □ _ \
*
C
-..
•».
>
*■ <D
>
m
l
ff
na
■
□
1 -.
__
Michael Baker

INTERNATIONAL

Page 828 of 1264 ends

Attachment 2
Cultural Resource Records Search
Results

Page 829 of 1264 ends

South Central Coastal Information Center
California State University, Fullerton
Department of Anthropology MH-426
800 North State College Boulevard
Fullerton, CA 92834-6846
657.278.5395 / FAX 657.278.5542
[email protected]
California Historical Resources Information System
Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura Counties
_____________________________________________________________________________ 4/18/2022 Records Search File No.: 23619.9708

Susan Zamudio-Gurrola
Michael Baker International
2729 Prospect Park Drive Suite 220
Rancho Cordova CA 95670
Re: Records Search Results for the Avid Hotel Project #188785 The South Central Coastal Information Center received your records search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Baldwin Park, CA USGS 7.5’ quadrangle. Due to the COVID-19 emergency, we have temporarily implemented new records search protocols. With the exception of some reports that have not yet been scanned, we are operationally digital for Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura Counties. See attached document for your reference on what data is available in this format.

The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and a ½-mile radius:

As indicated on the data request form, the locations of resources and reports are provided in the following format: ☐ custom GIS maps ☒ shape files ☐ hand drawn maps Resources within project area: 0 None
Resources within ½-mile radius: 1 SEE ATTACHED LIST
Reports within project area: 0 None
Reports within ½-mile radius: 1 SEE ATTACHED LIST
Resource Database Printout (list): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Database Printout (details): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Digital Database (spreadsheet): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (list): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (details): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Digital Database (spreadsheet): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Record Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed OHP Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD) 2019: ☒ available online; please go to https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=30338
Archaeo Determinations of Eligibility 2012: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monuments ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed

Page 830 of 1264 ends

Historical Maps: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Ethnographic Information: ☒ not available at SCCIC
Historical Literature: ☒ not available at SCCIC
GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: ☒ not available at SCCIC
Caltrans Bridge Survey: ☒ not available at SCCIC; please go to http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/historic.htm Shipwreck Inventory: ☒ not available at SCCIC; please go to http://shipwrecks.slc.ca.gov/ShipwrecksDatabase/Shipwrecks_Database.asp Soil Survey Maps: (see below) ☒ not available at SCCIC; please go to http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as soon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above.

The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of, or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission.

Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.

Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. Requests made after initial invoicing will result in the preparation of a separate invoice.

Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System, Michelle Galaz Cornforth
Assistant Coordinator

Page 831 of 1264 ends

Enclosures:
(X) Emergency Protocols for LA, Orange, and Ventura County BULK Processing Standards – 2 pages (X) GIS Shapefiles – 2 shapes
(X) Resource Database Printout (details) – 2 pages
(X) Resource Digital Database (spreadsheet) – 1 line
(X) Report Database Printout (details) – 1 page
(X) Report Digital Database (spreadsheet) – 1 line
(X) Resource Record Copies – (all) – 93 pages
(X) Report Copies – (all) – 30 pages
(X) Invoice # 23619.9708

Page 832 of 1264 ends

Emergency Protocols for LA, Orange, and Ventura County BULK or SINGLE PROJECT Records Searches IF YOU HAVE A GIS PERSON ON STAFF ONLY!! These instructions are for qualified consultants with a valid Access and Use Agreement.

WE ARE ONLY PROVIDING DATA THAT IS ALREADY DIGITAL AT THIS TIME. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY IS NOT DIGITAL AND THESE INSTRUCTIONS DO NOT APPLY.

Some of you have a fully digital operation and have GIS staff on board who can process a fully digital deliverable from the Information Center. IF you can accept shape file data and do not require a custom map made for you by the SCCIC, and you are willing to sort the data we provide to you then these instructions are for you. Read further to be sure. You may have only one project at this time or some of you have a lot of different search locations that can be processed all at once. This may save you a lot of time getting results back and if we process your jobs in bulk, and you may enjoy significant cost savings as well. If you need individual invoice or summaries for each search location, then bulk processing is not for you and you need to submit a data request form for each search location.

Bulk processing will work for you if you have a GIS person on staff who can sort bulk data for you and make you any necessary project maps. This type of job can have as many job locations as you want but the point is that we will do them in bulk – at the same time - not one at a time. We send all the bulk data back to you and you sort it. This will work if you need searches in LA, Orange, or Ventura AND if they all have the same search radius and if all the other search criteria is the same– no exceptions. This will not work for San Bernardino County because we are not fully digital for San Bernardino County. You must submit all your shape files for each location at the same time and this will count as one search. If you have some that need a different radius, or different search criteria, then you should submit that job separately with its own set of instructions.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR BULK PROCESSING:

Please send in your requests via email using the data request form along with the associated shape files and pdf maps of the project area(s) at 1-24k scale. PDFs must be able to be printed out on 8.5X 11 paper. We check your shape file data against the pdf maps. This is where we find discrepancies between your shape files and your maps. This is required.

Please use this data request form and make sure you fill it out properly. http://web.sonoma.edu/nwic/docs/CHRISDataRequestForm.pdf DELIVERABLES:

1. A copy of the Built Environment Resources Directory or BERD for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, or San Bernardino County can now be found at the OHP Website for you to do your own research. This replaces the old Historic Properties Directory or HPD. We will not be searching this for you at this time but you can search it while you are waiting for our results to save time.

You will only get shapefiles back, which means that you will have to make your own maps for each project location. WARNING! If you don’t request the shape files, you won’t be able to tell which reports are in the project area or the search radius. Please note that you are charged for

Page 833 of 1264 ends

each map feature even if you opt out of receiving shape files. You cannot get secondary products such as bibliographies or pdfs of records in the project area or search radius if you don’t pay for the primary products (shape files) as this is the scaffolding upon which the secondary products are derived. If you do not understand the digital fee structure, ask before we process your request and send you data. You can find the digital fee structure on the OHP website under the CHRIS tab. In order to keep costs down, you must be willing to make adjustments to the search radius or what you are expecting to receive as part of the search.

Remember that some areas are loaded with data and others are sparse – our fees will reflect that.

2. You will get a bulk processed bibliographies for resources and reports as selected; you will not get individual bibliographies for each project location.

3. You will get pdfs of resources and reports if you request them, provided that they are in digital formats. We will not be scanning records or reports at this time.

4. You will get one invoice for the bulk data processing. We can’t bill this as individual jobs on separate invoices for you. If there are multiple project names, we are willing to reference all the job names on the invoice if needed. If there a lot of job id’s we may ask you to send them in an email so that we can copy and paste it into the invoice details. If you need to bill your clients for the data, you can refer to our fee schedule on the OHP website under the CHRIS tab and apply the fees accordingly.

5. We will be billing you at the staff rate of $150 per hour and you will be charged for all resources and report locations according to the CHRIS Fee Structure. ($12 per GIS shape file; 0.15 per pdf page, or 0.25 per excel line; quad fees will apply if your research includes more than 2 quads).

Discounts offered early on in our Covid-19 response will no longer be offered on any records searched submitted after October 5th, 2020.

6. Your packet will be sent to you electronically via Dropbox. We use 7-zip to password protect the files so you will need both on your computers. We email you the password. If you can’t use Dropbox for some reason, then you will need to provide us with your Fed ex account number and we will ship you a disc with the results. As a last resort, we will ship on a disc via the USPS.

You may be billed for our shipping and handling costs.

I may not have been able to cover every possible contingency in this set of instructions and will update it if necessary. You can email me with questions at [email protected] Thank you,
Stacy St. James
South Central Coastal Information Center
Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, and San Bernardino Counties

Page 834 of 1264 ends

Report Detail: LA-10641
Citation information
Year: 2010
Title: Preliminary Historical/Archaeological Resources Study, San Bernadino Line Positive Train Control Project, Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Counties of Los Angeles and San Bernadino Affliliation: CRM Tech
No. pages: 30
Database record metadata
Entered: 10/25/2010 agarcia
Last modified: 3/12/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections: No
Disclosure: Not for publication
Record status:

Location information
Author(s): Tang, Bai "Tom"
Attributes: Archaeological, Field study
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): BALDWIN PARK, EL MONTE, LOS ANGELES, ONTARIO, SAN DIMAS Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-10641
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 0
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
3/12/2015 agarcia GIS QC

Page 1 of 1 ends

Page 835 of 1264 ends

Resource Detail: P-19-187085
P-19-187085
Identifying information
Primary No.:

Trinomial:

Attributes
General notes
Other IDs:

Recording events
Associated reports
Location information
County: Los Angeles
Address:

Collections: No
Management status
Cross-refs:

Disclosure: Unrestricted
Name: The Mojave Rd
Resource type:

Age:

Information base:

Accession no(s):

Facility:

PLSS:

UTMs:

Structure, Other
Historic
Survey, Other
Attribute codes: HP37 (Highway/trail)
USGS quad(s): BALDWIN PARK, EL MONTE, LONG BEACH, LOS ANGELES, ONTARIO, SAN DIMAS, SOUTH GATE Type Name
Resource Name The Mojave Rd
CHL 963
Date Recorder(s) Affiliation Notes
7/20/1989 S. Elder
9/19/2014 Marc Beherec AECOM Update
Report No. Year Title Affiliation
2014 Due-Diligence Historical/Archaeological
Resources Study, Media Center Development
Project City of El Monte, Los Angeles County,
California
LA-12788 CRM Tech
2014 Cultural Resources Study of the Wilmington Oil
and Gas Field, Los Angeles County, California
in Support of Analysis of Oil and Gas Well
Stimulation Treatments in California
Environmental Impact Report
LA-12808 Applied EarthWorks
2016 A Class III Section 106 (NHPA) Historic
Resource Study for the Arcadia Logistics
Center Project, SPL-408-2016-0020, City of
Arcadia, Los Angeles County, California
(Portions of APNs 8535-020-909, 8541-017-
800, 8545-024-007, -011, and -901, and 8546-
001-900)
LA-13259 Brian F. Smith and Associates

Page 1 of 2 ends

Page 836 of 1264 ends

Resource Detail: P-19-187085
Database record metadata
Entered: 9/3/2008
Last modified: 4/4/2019 mgalaz
IC actions:

Date User
Record status: Verified
Date User Action taken
9/3/2008 jay Appended data from Encodent database (standalone historics table; not in Sites-All)
4/4/2019 mgalaz Updated

Page 2 of 2 ends

Page 837 of 1264 ends

Attachment 3
Local Historical Society
Consultation

Page 838 of 1264 ends

We Make a Difference

INTERNATIONAL
March 30, 2022

COVINA VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
125 EAST COLLEGE STREET
COVINA, CALIFORNIA 91723
RE: AVID HOTEL PROJECT, CITY OF COVINA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA To Whom It May Concern:

Michael Baker International is conducting a cultural resources study in support of the Avid Hotel Project (project) in Covina, California. The project site consists of 0.85 acre at the northeast corner of Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street (Assessor Parcel Numbers 8432-006-015 and 8432-006-017) which currently includes two commercial buildings (578-580 North Azusa Avenue and 865-867 West Glentana Street), and vacant land. The project site is depicted on the accompanying figures (see Attachment 1).

The proposed development would involve the demolition of the existing commercial buildings and surface parking in order to construct a three-story hotel building containing a total of 68 guest rooms and surface parking. Vehicular access is proposed from a driveway along Azusa Avenue and a driveway along Glentana Street.

Please notify us if your organization has any information or concerns about historical resources on the project site. This is not a request for research; it is solely a request for public input related to any concerns that the Covina Historical Society may have. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at your earliest convenience at [email protected] or (805)384-4090.

Sincerely,
Susan Zamudio-Gurrola, M.H.P.

Senior Architectural Historian
Attachments:

Attachment 1 - Figures

Page 839 of 1264 ends

Regional Vicinity
Figure 1

AVID HOTEL PROJECT

COVINA, CA
Source: Esri, ArcGIS Online, National Geographic World Map: Covina, California Project Location
¯
0 2.5 5 10
Miles
Los Angeles
County
Map Detail
PN: 188785
&
I N J
N T A 2171 m

PLEASANT

VIEW RID GE
MAGIC

MOUNTAIN
MAGIC

MOUNTAIN
\
0 Ta tuts
La Canada
,^lintridge
Altaden#a
- c<t£ W
^FALLS*
CANYON
Foothill F
Pasadena
w
SAN
GABRIEL '■

SAN A GABRIEL
r^A
Vl
n
t
L
V
Sierra Madre SA’f
Monrovia
Duarte Glendora .Azusa •
•^C able Airport Foot!
Claremont Upland Rancfio
Cucamonga
S^p Dimas
La Verne*
Brackett FlifT
Arcadia1

Angeles Montebello - e Walnyt
A^nty u . ,
U»»w.00<l . ^ Chino H,1I
J J PkA Rivera .Whittier Rowland *«—«•»
Heights
t / axk// r
, t ~r \(f7
Maywood
^ 6 ell
Bell Gardens’
outh Gate Cudahy Springs
Lynwood Downey
W T''
Ontario
Montclair “Fontario Ir
Pomona
Chino* .d>4re\
Edison Ave
-lie <
o ^ *Chino Airport
X’ Sj. T
SantaFe South Whittier
.. e* *0^ V , ' rf' -■ 4
II ■ Y... \ _ l A CMINO £Vv CHIN
' . »Brea Hin v A L l LaM,rada A LI
.Compton Norwalk \ Yorba Linda MmiAir„ «*f
VT Paraftiount ^e||flower
i
La Mirada *Brea
__ |
Fullerton
Jiiun. a.,port x .Placentia
Artesia* Buena Park* Fullerton
Lakewood* *Cerritos
La Palma
/ ffr ‘ * r II 7'(pikauawus
Long Beach Xawaiian Gardens 57
^ A'?"* Cyfrress
Corona*
Cypress
Los Alarqitos ,r , ...

Stanton Anaheim
Lo^Alaftlms Aati.X //1
★
Michael Baker

INTERNATIONAL

Page 840 of 1264 ends

Project Vicinity
Figure 2

AVID HOTEL PROJECT

Page 841 of 1264 ends

Project Area
Figure 3

AVID HOTEL PROJECT

INTERNATIONAL

Page 842 of 1264 ends

1 ZamudioGurrola, Susan
From: ZamudioGurrola, Susan
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 10:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Proposed Avid Hotel Project
Attachments: Covina Historical Society letter.pdf
Hi Rosemarie,
Thanks for taking my call earlier. Attached is a copy of the letter I mailed to the Covina Valley Historical Society at the end of March. The maps depict the project site for the proposed hotel. Please let me know if the historical society has any concerns regarding historical/cultural resources in the project site.

Page 843 of 1264 ends

Attachment 4
DPR 523 Series Forms

Page 844 of 1264 ends

DPR 523A (9/2013) *Required information

Page 1 of 10 ends

P1. Other Identifier: 865-867 Glentana Street
*P2. Location: ☒ Unrestricted
*a. County Los Angeles and
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad Baldwin Park, Calif. Date 1966 (1981 edition) T 1S; R 10W; Section 14 S.B.B.M c. Address 578 N. Azusa Avenue City Covina Zip 91722
d. UTM: Zone 11 S, 416278 mE 3772608 mN
e. Other Locational Data: APN 8432-006-017
*P3a. Description:

The property consists of a generally rectangular-shaped 0.51-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street. Addressed as 578-580 North Azusa Avenue and 865-867 Glentana Street, the commercially zoned property contains three buildings, two of which immediately abut each other and front Azusa Ave and Glentana Street.

The third, smaller ancillary building is located to the rear (east). 578-580 North Azusa Avenue is the northwestern building on the property. It has a L-shaped footprint, and is topped by a lowpitched hipped roof clad with composite shingles. The roof has moderate eaves and wide fascia. The western façade features projecting and recessed bays and contains the primary entrance. Accessed via a paved walkway, the entrance consists of plain wooden double doors with a mail slot. Roman brick veneer accents the wall on the south side of the entrance and the lower wall surface, and forms a planter at the northwestern corner of the building. A secondary entrance is located at the south end of the façade. Fenestration consists of sliding windows with projecting surrounds. Landscaping includes grass lawn and ornamental plants and shrubs along Azusa Avenue, and a lawn at the rear of the property. A pole sign is located near the corner of Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street. The internally lit rectangular sign rests on a metal base and is topped by a curved embellishment. The sign announces Century Financial Escrows Inc. and Swing Loans Inc. Continued on p. 4. *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP6. 1-3 Story Commercial Building *P4. Resources Present: ☒ Building
P5b. Description of Photo:

Photo 1: Property overview from
Azusa Avenue, looking NE.

P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: ☒ Historic
1962 (City of Covina, n.d.)
*P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown
*P8. Recorded by:

Susan Zamudio-Gurrola, MHP
Michael Baker International
2729 Prospect Park Dr., Suite 220
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
*P9. Date Recorded: April 7, 2022
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
Pedestrian
*P11. Report Citation:

Hearth, Nicholas, Susan ZamudioGurrola, and Jacob Parsley. 2022. Cultural Resources Identification and Evaluation Memorandum for the Avid Hotel Project, Covina, Los Angeles County, California.
*Attachments: ☒Location Map ☒Continuation Sheet ☒Building, Structure, and Object Record State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P5a. Photograph or Drawing
«■*

Page 845 of 1264 ends

DPR 523B (9/2013) *Required information

Page 2 of 10 ends

*NRHP Status Code: 6Z
*Resource Name or # 578-580 North Azusa Avenue
B1. Historic Name: N/A
B2. Common Name: N/A
B3. Original Use: Model homes and offices
B4. Present Use: Commercial – office
*B5. Architectural Style: Modern Ranch
*B6. Construction History:

Per city building permit records, the buildings on the property were constructed in 1962. A window was replaced with a door in 1965. Other, unknown alterations were completed in 1965. Although a building permit listing the architect J.P. Anderson was located, no details about the work were provided. A portion of the roof was changed from wood shake to clay tile in 1990, and a portion of the roof was changed from gravel to composite shingles in 1999. The face of the pole sign was changed in 1995 to advertise Century Financial Escrows Inc. and Swing Loans Inc (City of Covina, n.d.). *B7. Moved? ☒No
*B8. Related Features: N/A
B9a. Architect: None b. Builder: Coronado Enterprises, Inc. *B10. Significance: Theme Community Planning and Development Area: Covina Period of Significance N/A Property Type Commercial – office Applicable Criteria N/A

The area on which Covina was founded was part of the La Puente Rancho owned by William Workman and John Rowland, and was bordered closely by Rancho de Azusa. The Mexican–American war had a profound effect on California’s land tenure system. The traditional Spanish and Mexican survey and ownership systems were incompatible with American survey and mapping standards. United States Congress passed The Land Act of 1851, which was authored by a politically motivated spokesperson for American settlers, and called into question all of the previously established land rights from the Mexican administration. The Land Act mandated that all title-holders had to prove their ownership through new laws developed by Congress (Historic Preservation Partners 2007).

Workman and Rowland successfully argued their case before the court and their ownership was confirmed in 1867. They experimented with a wide variety of agriculture, but drought/flood cycles limited the type of crops grown. A drought in 1863- 1864 decimated herds and crippled the area cattle industry from that point forward (Historic Preservation Partners 2007).

Joseph Phillips visited the Azusa Valley in 1881 and believed the area would be a good potential suburb of Los Angeles. He is credited with the formation of Covina, establishing the area’s identity and guiding its development through subdivision and boosterism. Phillips purchased land, and from 1883 to 1885 employed a surveyor to divide it into 10-acre lots. Continued on p

4. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: N/A
*B12. References: See continuation sheet, page 9.

B13. Remarks: None.
*B14. Evaluator:

Susan Zamudio-Gurrola, Michael Baker International
*Date of Evaluation: 25-Apr-22
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
(This space reserved for official comments.)

W FRONT STREET
V3?..' 578-580
N. AZUSA AVE
865-867

GLENTANA ST

GLENTANA STREET
s
160
I Feet

Page 846 of 1264 ends

DPR 523J (9/2013) * Required information

Page 3 of 10 ends

*Map Name: Baldwin Park, Calif. *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: 1966 (1982 edition)

State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LOCATION MAP Trinomial
I:"An
<*'
4 !/^C£
n
/
al« JH. IT
AV-itf >•
f
r
\
«
?V|
, -I X
A
2 S
r AMlO
<r
>■0
!//
c 12
*
«a* ft
*
£!
fo AS,
r
V
il
k .
/*Vf
IJ
>*4£ N! £
V -
r V t? of
o
?Bj
ro A>J
V /*— i!
2 a
ESi
is
1 sm •i—w<--------inn
<V
>
I
W /
n
ml
ffVJf
aCjIMI’*.
■W —
BU,
i f
Ts
—, R Q
~d V< if
Jv» —- R
F
f4 nc
LNV
£ 0*1
5 A
13 Ji
,. LJi-JUjii
“••a™'
0"!
o L
j
r
f
i\
-*
ti
R
« !'"*{ -i 1
4VC
!
• *
if
o*r XV. Xfl If >57 I ‘j
Jr H
&
V
ri
Oj w z
s:
sp?
X ■J
» ■•l
( A£U3A
LAM \. ■* r I §■ S
z* %>
§g
,00< J!
A r-vT s 0
RT^S 4
Xu
W,
I
vw
% arn
c<n
& o»
C a««
■jflCATWgi
s
] dXfjL0i|U-i
a
r • <fc
C
hQCC
i
T
U
^ptcsTS I
•fe.

I
a - .■ o ’,
* »
i X"
N-/
1 t 1
1 ^ \ V. M »
5!
H-
) \ I L ?
. s#r *
Park
FOU *5v*f 1% ''uonc njJa\ i
Jit
fl
at*
Ji-Jc.p: ■
j
_i—j, "■! ir“*" isr
8 8
lju
jrhr 'fn'i —-5T ;Sf7sr te y I IrS*,!jMffirrrrrirf(-7
'42
r.‘ A ■ *
\\ il
D
m
D
ritJLXWi
«
A
®
crrff
fl* »n.

IA;
1 Jg 1M if:, TTTT -iTrjP
3ft :/j
r °
N>-UOO
o
- ho
ii
en
l
2,000ft
o
CJl
cn

Page 847 of 1264 ends

Page 4 of 10 ends

*Recorded by: Susan Zamudio-Gurrola, Michael Baker International *Date: 25-April-2022 ☒ Continuation DPR 523L (9/2013)
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*P3a. Description, continued:
865-867 Glentana Street immediately abuts the aforementioned building to the south. It has a L-shaped footprint and the majority of the building is covered by a cross-gabled roof clad with barrel and flat concrete tile. However, a small section where the two buildings meet has a flat roof with exposed rafter tails, indicating the buildings may have originally been separate and were later joined through an addition/alteration, although there is no evidence in building permit records. The building’s exterior is sheathed with stucco and stone veneer accents. Fenestration includes aluminum sliding windows of various sizes throughout. The southern façade features projecting and recessed bays, and Dutch gables at each end of the façade, under which are two separate entrances. Each entrance has a single wooden door with a mail slot, and is accessed via a paved walkway. The portion of the building under the western Dutch gable appears to be an addition, based on the roofline, roofing material, and unusual connection to the adjacent building. However, there is no evidence of alterations in this area in building permit records. The eastern elevation does not display any detailing besides aluminum sliding windows, and the northern elevation displays a brick chimney. Landscaping includes grass lawn, and small ornamental plants and trees in front of the southern façade, and western and northern elevations. A white picket fence encloses a portion of the landscaped area along Glentana Street.

To the rear of the building is a grass lawn, and to the east of the building is a paved parking lot.

The smaller building on the property located to the rear is not clearly visible from the public right-of-way. It has a rectangular plan and is sheathed in stucco. The building is capped by a Dutch gabled roof which is clad with composite shingles and has wooden fascia boards. Two single wooden doors are located on the south elevation. The north and west elevations display aluminum-framed windows.
*B10. Significance, continued:

Phillips left 120 acres to be developed into a town site which became downtown Covina. 1886 is the recognized date for the founding of Covina, although it did not incorporate until after the turn of the century (Historic Preservation Partners 2007).

Phillips also researched and implemented ways to improve irrigation, and early settlers struggled to find profitable crops for the region and better ways to bring them to market. In 1869, the Southern Pacific Railroad arrived in Los Angeles and was joined by the Santa Fe Railroad in 1886. Fierce competition between the two railroads led to a rate war which resulted in a massive migration to Southern California. Much of this growth was driven by immigration from the Midwest (Historic Preservation Partners 2007).

In the 1890s, residents of the new town of Covina made a coordinated effort to bring one of the railways to the town to allow them to more easily ship out agricultural goods and provide other economic opportunities. The Southern Pacific extended service to Covina in September 1895. In addition, the Pacific Electric car increased the accessibility of towns like Covina to Los Angeles (Historic Preservation Partners 2007).

Citrus was slow to catch on in Covina because many of the settlers came from eastern states and were more comfortable growing familiar crops such as wheat. The first citrus in Covina was planted in 1886; however, it did not take hold until the 1890s when farmers switched from deciduous fruits and truck gardens to citrus. During this period, thousands of acres were planted with citrus and packinghouses were built to process the crop. At one time, at least six packinghouses were located near the railroad tracks. Covina finally had a profitable crop and an easy way to bring it to market. The city developed as a citrus capital in the early twentieth century (Historic Preservation Partners 2007).

In the post-World War II era, Covina experienced a significant transformation similar to much of Southern California.

Covina essentially had been a market town serving small farms and orchards in the area. By the early 1950s, the city’s role in the region began to transform from being primarily agricultural and commercial to becoming a residential community. Because of Southern California’s severe housing shortage, land in the San Gabriel Valley became more valuable for residential use than as agricultural land. Further undermining the viability of agriculture was the arrival of “quick decline” disease, which devastated orchards throughout Southern California. Much of the farm and ranchland in Covina was subdivided and developed during a residential development boom that continued into the 1970s. The city expanded through various annexations. In 1950, the city’s population was just under 4,000 people, and by 1960

Page 848 of 1264 ends

Page 6 of 10 ends

*Recorded by: Susan Zamudio-Gurrola, Michael Baker International *Date: 25-April-2022 ☒ Continuation DPR 523L (9/2013)
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Figure 2 – 1968 Aerial Photo Depicting 578 N. Azusa Ave, Covina (Source: UCSB Library 1968) Newspapers advertised the subject buildings as furnished model homes with features such as custom styling, large bedrooms, oversized walk-in closets, stone fireplaces, lath and plaster, birch and ash cabinets, and built-in electric kitchens (Los Angeles Times 1962).
578 N. Azusa Avenue’s occupancy was changed to solely offices in 1963. Harvey & Associates’ offices were based out of the subject property in 1965, at which time a window at the front of the building was replaced with a 3-foot door. It appears the property changed hands later that year, and Paul V. Birnbaum obtained permits in October 1965 to change the building occupancy to “Partial Offices & Res.” Unknown alterations were completed at this time. Although the architect, J.P. Anderson, was listed on the building permit, no details were provided for the work. Birnbaum owned the property through at least 1967 (City of Covina, n.d.).

Martin Mayerfeld acquired the property by the early 1970s. He was a Realtor and associated with Mayerfeld Realty and Swan Pools. His business was based out of the subject building for some time. Work conducted on the property under Mayerfeld’s ownership included reroofing at 867 Glentana Street in 1990, at which time 3,000 square feet were changed from wood shake to clay tile. In 1999, 3,700 square feet of the building were reroofed, and changed from gravel to composite shingles. Although the address on the permit is listed as 867 Glentana Street, this work appears to have been completed at 578-580 N. Azusa Avenue. In 1995, the face of the pole sign was changed to advertise Century Financial Escrows Inc. and Swing Loans Inc (City of Covina, n.d.). Martin and Elayne Mayerfeld owned the property through at least 2010 (City of Covina 2010).

A review of regional newspapers did not uncover any additional information about the property.

Property Owners and Occupants
Coronado Enterprises, Inc., also known as Coronado Homes, was based out of West Covina in 1962 when the subject property was being constructed. Subsequently, the business was located at the subject property (City of Covina, n.d.; Los Angeles Times 1962). Based on the minimal advertising and press coverage, the real estate/home builder company did not seem to be particularly productive or successful. By 1968, Coronado Enterprises Inc. was advertising a car sales lot in Duarte, California, which it was closing down (Daily News-Post 1968).

Regional newspaper articles indicate Paul V. Birnbaum was involved in commercial real estate development in the 1950s and 1960s. He was based out of Covina in the mid-1950s (Pomona Progress Bulletin 1956; Daily News-Post 1957), Santa Ana in 1965, and south Laguna in 1967 (City of Covina, n.d.).

George F. Bischoff was associated with Acme Business Sales, which appears to have been a business conducting real irftJ
EE

Page 849 of 1264 ends

Page 7 of 10 ends

Martin Mayerfeld was a Realtor and investment instructor working in the Covina area in the 1970s. His office was located at the subject property for some time, but he either moved or had other offices in Claremont and Upland, California (Pomona Progress Bulletin 1977).

Architectural Style
The Ranch style developed in Southern California in the mid-1930s, and was one of the small house types allowed to be built under Federal Housing Administration (FHA) financing guidelines during the 1940s. After World War II, financial controls that mandated very small houses were lifted, and the style gained popularity. The size of Ranch homes increased as FHA guidelines were revised. This allowed builders to more effectively vary the appearance of house plans and façades to avoid a monotonous appearance in neighborhoods. The Ranch style became the most popular house style built in the United States in the 1950s and 1960s, and was often used in building large subdivisions.

The style was ubiquitous across most southern, southwestern and western states. Characteristics of Ranch style homes include long footprints and low, horizontal massing; low-pitched roofs with moderate to wide overhangs; asymmetrical façades; off-center primary entrances; large picture windows and a variety of window sizes; wood, brick, stone, asbestos and wood shingles, concrete blocks, and stucco wall cladding; and frequent use of two or more cladding materials. The housing type has been described as “middle-of-the-road modern” and “modern inside, traditional outside.” Builders and lenders considered this style to be more acceptable to the American public than dramatic modern designs (McAlester 2013).

Variations on the Ranch style include the California Ranch and the Modern Ranch, the latter which was influenced by the Mid-Century Modern movement. Modern Ranch homes emphasize horizontal planes more than California Ranches, and included modern instead of traditional stylistic details. Some character-defining features of Modern Ranches include low-pitched hipped or flat roofs; prominent rectangular chimneys; large wood or metal-framed windows, clerestory windows and stacked windows; recessed entryways; and wood or concrete block privacy screens.

Other stylistic elements resulted in Asian and storybook variations (Lazzaretto 2013).

California Register of Historical Resources Evaluation
Criterion 1 – Constructed in 1962, the buildings on the property were originally a combination of residential and office space. They were used as model homes and offices for a real estate development company which, as previously discussed, was not particularly productive or successful. Archival research did not indicate the property is associated with any significant events or trends in national, state, regional, or local history. While it is generally associated with post-World War II residential and commercial development, the property did not play an important role in the history of residential or commercial development in Covina, and is not significant within those contexts. Thus, it is recommended ineligible under Criterion 1.

Criterion 2 – Archival research did not demonstrate the commercial property is associated with individuals who have made significant contributions to national, state or local history. Therefore, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 2.

Criterion 3 – The two buildings fronting Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street were built in a Modern Ranch style, and feature long footprints, low horizontal massing, variation in elevation bays, stucco cladding, stone and brick veneer, and low-pitched hipped and Dutch gable roofs. However, they are not outstanding or high-style examples of Modern Ranch homes. The buildings are also not good examples of residential construction because they were constructed to be used as both residential and office space. In addition, the two buildings exhibit alterations. For example, the incongruous roof style at the location where the two buildings meet suggests the buildings may have been separate at one time, and appear to have been bridged by that section clad with rock veneer. 865-867 Glentana Street’s appearance has been notably changed by the replacement of its original wood shake roof to two different types of non-original roof tile, one of which is Spanish in style.

Page 850 of 1264 ends

Page 8 of 10 ends

*Recorded by: Susan Zamudio-Gurrola, Michael Baker International *Date: 25-April-2022 ☒ Continuation DPR 523L (9/2013)
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Additionally, the smaller ancillary building at the rear of the property does not have any stylistic features, and is not representative of any particular architectural style. The buildings were not designed or built by a master architect or builder. They do not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, nor do they represent the work of a master or possess high artistic values. Thus, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 3.

Criterion 4 – National Park Service guidance for the equivalent National Register Criterion D states that certain important research questions about human history can only be answered by the actual physical material of cultural resources. The buildings do not meet the two requirements identified for eligibility under Criterion D. The buildings on the subject property have not been used as a source of data and do not contain more, as yet unretrieved data. The buildings have not been determined, through testing or research, to be a likely source of data. Therefore, they are recommended ineligible under California Register Criterion 4, as they have not yielded and do not have the potential to yield information important to our understanding of prehistory or history of the local area, state, or nation.

Covina Historic Landmark/Structure of Merit Evaluation
Criterion 1 – As discussed above, the buildings on the property were constructed to serve a combined use of model homes and office space for a real estate development company. Archival research did not indicate the property exemplifies or reflects special elements of Covina’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, architectural, or natural history. No associations with important events or trends within the above themes were identified. Therefore, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 1.

Criterion 2 – Archival research did not indicate the property is associated with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history. Thus, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 2.

Criterion 3 – The buildings on the property were constructed by a real estate development company that was not particularly productive or successful. The buildings were not architect-designed; thus, they do not represent the work of a notable architect, designer, or builder. The property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 3.

Criterion 4 – None of the buildings on the property embody distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or are valuable examples of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship. The two primary buildings fronting Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street were built in a Modern Ranch style, and feature long footprints, low horizontal massing, variation in elevation bays, stucco cladding, stone and brick veneer, and low-pitched hipped and Dutch gable roofs. However, they are not outstanding or high-style examples of Modern Ranch homes. The buildings are also not good examples of residential construction because they were built to be used as both residential and office space. In addition, they exhibit alterations. For example, the incongruous roof style at the location where the two buildings meet suggests the buildings may have been separate at one time, and appear to have been bridged by that section clad with rock veneer. 865-867 Glentana Street’s appearance has been notably changed by the replacement of its original wood shake roof to two different types of non-original roof tile, one of which is Spanish in style. Lastly, the smaller ancillary building at the rear of the property does not have any stylistic features, and is not representative of any particular architectural style. The property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 4.

Criterion 6 – The subject property is not one of a few remaining examples of an architectural or historic type or specimen in Covina, the state, or the nation.

In summary, the property does not appear to meet any of the criteria for designation as a Covina Historic Landmark or Structure of Merit.

Page 851 of 1264 ends

Page 9 of 10 ends

City of Covina. 2010. “Lien on Real Property” for 578 N. Azusa Ave., Mapbook 8432, Page 006, Parcel 017, March 3, 2010. On file with the City of Covina and Michael Baker International. ———. n.d. Building permit records for 578-580 N. Azusa Avenue and 865-867 Glentana Street. On file with the City of Covina and Michael Baker International.

Daily News-Post (Monrovia, California). 1957. “Zone Change Draws Protests.” July 12, 1957. ———. 1968. Advertisement for Coronado Enterprises Inc, January 23, 1968. Accessed April 6, 2022.

Newspapers.com.

Historic Preservation Partners 2007. Covina Town Center Historic Resource Survey. Prepared for the City of Covina. Accessed March 30, 2022.
https://covinaca.gov/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/1254/covina_historic_su rvey_report_6-07.pdf.

Lazzaretto, Christine. 2013. National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form for Modern Architectural Resources in Riverside, California, 1935-1975. October 1, 2013. Accessed April 6, 2022. https://riversideca.gov/historic/pdf/Modernism-II-Survey.pdf Los Angeles Times. 1962. Advertisement for Coronado Enterprises. November 22, 1962, page 14. Accessed April 6, 2022. https://www.newspapers.com/image/162024429/?terms=%22Coronado%20Enterprises%22&match=1 McAlester, Virginia Savage. 2013. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Pomona Progress Bulletin. 1956. “Charter Oak Shopping Area Is Approved.” December 29, 1956, page 6.

Accessed April 6, 2022.
https://www.newspapers.com/image/624020647/?terms=%22Paul%20Birnbaum%22&match=1 ———. 1977. “Realtor joins Laguna board.” November 27, 1977. Accessed April 6, 2022. https://www.newspapers.com/image/72317195/?terms=%22Martin%20Mayerfeld%22&match=1 Sanborn Map Company. 1911. Covina, California map. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://digitalsanbornmapsproquest-com.ezproxy.lapl.org/browse_maps/5/489/2162/2204/22080?accountid=6749 ———. 1929. Covina, California map. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://digitalsanbornmaps-proquestcom.ezproxy.lapl.org/browse_maps/5/489/2163/2205/22088?accountid=6749 UCSB (University of California, Santa Barbara) Library. 1928. “Flight C-300, Frame I-123.” Aerial photograph.

Accessed April 1, 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder. ———. 1949. “Flight C-13990, Frame 1-117X.” Aerial photograph. Accessed March 29, 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.
———. 1954. “Flight AXJ-1952, Frame 19K-163.” Aerial photograph. Accessed March 29, 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.
———. 1960. “Flight C-23870, Frame 1054.” Aerial photograph. Accessed March 29, 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.
———. 1968. “Flight TG-2400, Frame 1-230.” Aerial photograph. Accessed March 29, 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.

USGS (United States Geological Survey). 1927. Puente, California 7.5’ quadrangle. Accessed March 29, 2022. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ht-bin/tv_browse.pl?id=50316982b524b5b4e3dbf7901dcda5d8

Page 852 of 1264 ends

Page 10 ends

Photo 2: 865-867 Glentana St., S elevation, looking N Photo 3: 865-867 Glentana St., N elevation, looking S

Photo 4: 578-580 N. Azusa Ave, N elevation, looking S Photo 5: 578-580 N. Azusa Ave, W elevation, looking SE

Photo 6: 865-867 Glentana St., W and S elevations, Photo 7: Ancillary building, W and S elevations, looking looking NE looking NE
- r
"
BaHWilM
?
Hh
:. -V
" .

V
—
i. I
*>
3K
■V'

Page 853 of 1264 ends

APPENDIX C
Geotechnical Evaluation Report and Addendum

Page 854 of 1264 ends

G E O T E C H N I C A L

E V A L U A T I O N

R E P O R T

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Proposed Hotel Development
578 N. Azusa Ave.

Covina, CA 91722
Job No.: 22-075
August 24, 2022
14175 Telephone Ave. Ste. K | Chino, CA 91710 | 909.594.7414 | www.ducoengineering.com

DUCO ENGINEERING
-
V Sr
< y
m
y m
aw
r-'
w
/
/
i la
v
4 If
:
® y /
Z'.J
i. -•■ y
&
aa
T ‘
““
*r V -
% m
-': jft
&
K4
--
v
-
s@
u

Page 855 of 1264 ends

14175 Telephone Ave. Ste. K | Chino, Ca. 91710 | 909.594.7414 | [email protected] August 24, 2022
Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC
Attn: Mr. Raj Patel
1011 S. Atlantic Ave.

Compton, CA 90221
Subject: REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Proposed Hotel Development
578 N. Azusa Ave.

Covina, CA 91722
Job No.: 22-075
Mr. Patel:

Thank you for the opportunity for Duco Engineering, Inc., to provide geotechnical services for this project. It is our pleasure to serve as the geotechnical consultant for the design and construction of the proposed commercial development project. The following presents a report of the geotechnical subsurface evaluation conducted at the subject site on August 10, 2022, in addition to an account of laboratory testing performed, and construction recommendations pertinent to the project. It is the opinion of this firm that, with the validating inclusion of our recommendations, the proposed construction and site improvements will be acceptable and safe from a geotechnical standpoint. Please notify our office if any significant changes are made to the proposed development plan, as such changes may warrant further comment or revision of the provided recommendations.

Our office welcomes any further questions or comments you may have. It is our desire to serve our clients with the utmost efficiency and professionalism.

Respectfully submitted,
DUCO ENGINEERING, INC.

James D. Collett, P.E.

DUCO ENGINEERING

Page 856 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................. 4

1.1 Scope of Report................................................................................................................................................ 4

1.2 Scope of Construction ...................................................................................................................................... 4

2.0 SITE EVALUATION .............................................. 4

2.1 Field Exploration............................................................................................................................................... 4

2.2 Laboratory Testing ........................................................................................................................................... 4

3.0 SITE CONDITIONS .............................................. 5

3.1 Surficial Conditions........................................................................................................................................... 5

3.2 Subsurface Conditions...................................................................................................................................... 5

3.3 Geologic Summary........................................................................................................................................... 5

3.4 Seismic and Geologic Hazards ..................................................................................................................... 5

3.5 Groundwater..................................................................................................................................................... 6

4.0 SITE CONCLUSIONS ............................................ 7

4.1 Site Feasibility ................................................................................................................................................... 7

4.2 Soil Expansivity ................................................................................................................................................. 7

4.3 Soil Corrosivity .................................................................................................................................................. 7

4.4 Seismic Design Considerations....................................................................................................................... 7

4.5 Grading and Site Preparation ...................................................................................................................... 7

4.6 Stormwater Infiltration..................................................................................................................................... 7

5.0 GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS ....................... 8

5.1 Soil Corrosivity .................................................................................................................................................. 8

5.2 Grading and Site Preparation ...................................................................................................................... 8

5.2.1 Demolition and Debris Disposal.......................................................................................................... 8

5.2.2 Grading Recommendations.................................................................................................................. 8

5.2.3 Shrinkage................................................................................................................................................. 8

5.3 Building Foundations......................................................................................................................................... 9

5.4 Floor Slabs.......................................................................................................................................................... 9

5.5 Retaining Walls.............................................................................................................................................. 10

5.5.1 Retaining Wall Backfill and Drainage...........................................................................................10

5.6 Temporary Excavations................................................................................................................................ 10

5.7 Drainage and Landscaping......................................................................................................................... 10

5.8 Hardscape....................................................................................................................................................... 10

5.9 Pavement Design............................................................................................................................................ 11

6.0 SUMMARY & CLOSURE ........................................ 13

6.1 Design Review ................................................................................................................................................ 13

6.2 Project Oversight and Inspection................................................................................................................ 13

6.3 Closure.............................................................................................................................................................. 13

7.0 REFERENCES ................................................... 14

Page 857 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 3
A. APPENDIX: MAPS, LOGS .................................... A - 1 B. APP ENDIX: FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING ......... B - 1 B1.0 Laboratory Test Procedures..................................................................................................................... B-1 B1.1 Shear Strength ..................................................................................................................................... B-1 B1.2 Settlement ............................................................................................................................................. B-1 B1.3 Expansive Index (EI)............................................................................................................................ B-1 B1.4 Corrosivity............................................................................................................................................. B-1 B2.0 Laboratory Test Results............................................................................................................................. B-2 Table B2.1 Maximum Unit Weight and Expansive Index, and R-Value .......................................... B-2 Table B2.2 Corrosive Properties ............................................................................................................... B-2 C. APPENDIX: GENERAL GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS .. C - 1
C.1 Structural Fills................................................................................................................................................ C-1 C.2 Overexcavation ........................................................................................................................................... C-1 C.3 Fill Placement................................................................................................................................................ C-1 C.4 Fill Slopes, Retaining Wall Backfills ........................................................................................................ C-2 C.5 Grading/Earthwork Inspection................................................................................................................. C-2

Page 858 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 4

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Scope of Report
This study provides an assessment of the soil conditions in the vicinity of the proposed commercial development at 578 North Azusa Ave., in the City of Covina, California. Grading and construction recommendations are also provided herein to aid in the design and construction of the proposed site improvements. Project reference material included, among other documents, a preliminary site plan provided by Rhyton Engineering, which was adapted for our boring map on Figure 1.

1.2 Scope of Construction
The currently proposed scope of work consists of the construction of a three-story hotel building, including perimeter parking and other accessory site improvements. Site preparation will consist of demolition and remedial grading to create a firm, competent building pad to support the proposed structure, as well as lot levelling and subgrade processing for the parking areas.

2.0 SITE EVALUATION

2.1 Field Exploration
On August 10, 2022, this firm performed a field reconnaissance at the subject site. Subsurface exploration involved observation, logging, and sampling of four (4) test borings with a hollow-stem auger to a maximum depth of 50 feet. Test borings were backfilled following completion of logging and sampling. The locations of the test holes and a sketch of the proposed site are attached as Figure 1; test hole logs can be found in Appendix A. Where taken, in-place samples were obtained using a 2.5-inch O.D. ring sampler with a 140- lb automatic-trip hammer.

Infiltration testing was also performed using the borehole percolation method in two (2) locations roughly corresponding to the proposed infiltration device location, using Test Boring 1 as well as an auxiliary boring location some 10 feet away. These tests were conducted at an invert depth of 10 and 25 feet, respectively, with a minimum start-to-finish test duration of three (3) hours per Los Angeles County standards. Due to the sandy nature of the site, readings were taken at 10-minute intervals. Borings were backfilled upon completion of testing.

2.2 Laboratory Testing
On-site soils as encountered were tested for various material properties/characteristics, potentially including, but not limited to, shear strength, settlement/consolidation behavior, expansive index, and corrosive properties. Laboratory testing for this project was limited to the testing of on-site materials; the import of any materials for structural fill or backfill may warrant further testing at the time of grading/construction. A brief description of various common tests is presented in Appendix B, with results for each test included therein. All remaining soil samples are stored for future reference and analysis, if desired. Unless notified to the contrary, all samples are subject to discarding after 45 days of the date of this report.

Page 859 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 5

3.0 SITE CONDITION S

3.1 Surficial Conditions
The subject site consists of an array of parcels totaling approximately 0.8 acres on the northeast corner of Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street, just north of San Bernardino Road. The front (Azusa Avenue street side) portion of the lot is occupied by a series of single-story wood frame structures while the east side of the property is a vacant dirt lot, with an alleyway running north-to-south bisecting the property. The current drainage pattern is generally flat but with an overall apparent north-to-south trend; the easterly vacant portion of the lot exhibits a slightly mounded surface contour. The site is bounded to the north by a propertyline commercial building and to the east by a commercial yard bounded by a chain link fence, while the south and west property lines are open to the street. The vacant lot portion of the subject site exhibited signs of prior site disturbance, likely from a previous structure and/or weed abatement measures. Historical aerial photos show this portion of lot to vacant dating back to at least 1985, though information prior to that was not able to be located.

3.2 Subsurface Conditions
Near-surface soils encountered in subsurface explorations consisted of soft native soils to a depth of up to four (4) to five (5) feet, observed to generally consist of soft, brown silty sands with scattered debris.

Competent native soils were encountered immediately beneath these fills, consisting of fine silty sands at contact, with coarser stratum and the occasional silt lens at greater depth. In-place density of these native soils was generally found to exceed 85% relative compaction below approximately six (6) feet deep.

Coarser sandy soils with gravel were found at approximately 20 feet, with occasional silty lenses.

Undisturbed native soils were found to be adequate for the support of structures and structural fills.

Stratigraphy may vary in localized areas, because of past grading and/or landscaping operations, as well as in the area of the existing structures to the west. Details of test holes can be found in the log of borings in Appendix A. Bulk soil samples were taken for subsequent laboratory testing and analysis. Earthen materials were visually classified in general accordance with Unified Soil Classification System of Nomenclature.

3.3 Geologic Summary
The subject site is located in the alluvial plain that emanates south from the San Gabriel Mountains, which constitute a significant portion of the Transverse Ranges. Dibblee, et.al. (1999) mapped the site within a deposit of Quaternary alluvial gravel, sand, and silt (Qa), a description in general conformance with the findings of our subsurface evaluation. Nearby faults with the potential to induce significant ground shaking include the Indian Hill Fault (1.45 km ESE), San Jose Fault (7.0 km SE), Sierra Madre Fault Zone (4.3 km N), and San Andreas Fault Zone (37.2 km NE), among others.

3.4 Seismic and Geologic Hazards
The subject site is not mapped within any area of susceptibility to fault rupture, liquefaction, or slope instability from seismic activity by the California Geological Survey. No faults or significant slopes are known to exist within a zone of imminent influence to the subject site, so we concur with these mappings that the potential risks of these seismic hazards at the subject site are very low.

As with much of California, faulting in the region of the subject property produce ground shaking of a significant magnitude. Given that known faults in the region are included in the UCERF models used to develop the ASCE 7 ground motions, a structural design in accordance with the 2019 California Building Code and ASCE 7-16 will be able to maintain adequate serviceability when exposed to maximum anticipated ground motions.

Page 860 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 6

3.5 Groundwater
Groundwater was not encountered in any test hole and is not anticipated at any elevation that would affect the development. The California Geological Survey (1998) has mapped likely historic highwater at approximately 175 feet deep, which is supported by well data from the County of Los Angeles and others (LACDPW, 2022), (DWR, 2022).

Page 861 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 7

4.0 SITE CONCLUSIONS

4.1 Site Feasibility
Conditions at the site are considered suitable for the proposed development. Provided the proposed development is constructed in conformance with the recommendations herein, the proposed development will be safe and adequate for its intended use. The proposed construction will not adversely affect the stability of properties outside of the building site.

4.2 Soil Expansivity
Expansion testing was performed on near-surface fill and native soils. These soils are considered to have a low expansion potential. Results of these tests can be found in Appendix B. Expansive soil design recommendations herein are based upon a moderate expansion potential within the zone of reasonable influence of the footings and floor slab. During grading procedures, it is possible that the soils that will directly affect the surrounding foundations will vary. An expansion test and revision of these recommendations may be necessary.

4.3 Soil Corrosivity
A representative sample of the onsite soil was obtained for corrosivity testing. Results of those tests are presented in Appendix B. Based on the results of the tests, the onsite soils are moderately corrosive with respect to resistivity only. On-site soils are not considered corrosive to concrete.

4.4 Seismic Design Considerations
The following parameters based on ASCE 7-16 may be used for the proposed structural design in accordance with Section 1613 of the 2019 California Building Code, provided that the seismic response coefficient is evaluated per Exception 2 of ASCE 71-16 Section 11.4.8:

Table 1: ASCE 7-16 seismic design parameters from seismicmaps.org for (34.09082554, -117.90697950) Site Class SS S1 SDS SD1 SMS SM1 PGAM
D 1.649 g 0.611 g 1.099 g 0.692 g 1.649 g 1.039 g 0.768 g Should this exemption not apply, then a risk-targeted ground motion analysis shall be conducted in accordance with Section 21.2 of ASCE 7-16, based on the preliminary structural design. Given the preliminary nature of this current evaluation, no such evaluation was not included in the contracted scope of work. Should such an evaluation be deemed necessary by the structural engineer, our firm shall immediately be contacted for further design-specific review and comment.

4.5 Grading and Site Preparation
In addition to surface grading to achieve finish elevations, grading for the proposed site improvements shall consist of removal and recompaction to create a firm, competent building pad, as well as subgrade preparation for parking areas. Grading recommendations are provided below, in Section 5.2.

4.6 Stormwater Infiltration
Based on the results of our on-site evaluation of infiltration potential, on-site infiltration is considered feasible. Refer to Section 5.10 below for further discussion and recommendations.

Page 862 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 8

5.0 GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Soil Corrosivity
Given that on-site soils are considered moderately corrosive with respect to resistivity only, concrete need not incorporate additional measures in accordance with Chapter 4 of ACI 318. It is recommended, however, that all metal pipes should be wrapped in a tape coating system, sleeved, coated with a high-quality dielectric coating, or embedded in 3 sac slurry mix using type V cement. Bond underground steel pipes with rubber-gasketed or other nonconductive type joints for electrical continuity. Copper pipes should be placed in a poly-sleeve or other appropriate material and protected from soil contact. Consideration should be given to running overhead. It should be noted that the municipality may have minimum requirements for mitigation of soil corrosivity; those requirements shall govern if more conservative than the aforementioned recommendations.

5.2 Grading and Site Preparation
To remediate differential bearing soils and undocumented fill beneath proposed foundations, overexcavation and recompaction shall be performed to (a) remove all unsuitable surface soils to uniformly expose undisturbed, competent alluvium, (b) provide a minimum of 24 inches of compacted fill below all footings, and (c) provide a minimum of five (5) feet of removal below existing grade. Upon achieving this required surface removal, localized removals will be performed as necessary where the exposed excavation bottom does not exceed 85% relative compaction. Given the soil conditions encountered in our test borings, we anticipate removals on the order of five (5) to six (6) feet below existing grade. Where possible, lateral limits of grading shall extend the grater of (a) 1:1 the excavation depth or (b) five (5) feet, outside the foundation footprint in every direction. Overexcavation shall be avoided in easement areas, to minimize risks associated with exposing utilities. All processing and fill placement (including retaining wall backfill) shall conform to the following guidelines:

5.2.1 Demolition and Debris Disposal
Any demolition debris, debris encountered in the clearing and grubbing, and all vegetation is to be cleared from the grading area and hauled offsite. Any existing or abandoned utilities located within the proposed development area should be removed or relocated.

5.2.2 Grading Recommendations
After removal of all debris and vegetation and conforming to those recommendations previously set forth in site preparation and grading, soils may be recompacted. Prior to recompaction of these materials, all excavations will be inspected and approved prior to placing fill. The bottom of the approved excavation will be properly scarified; moisture conditioned and compacted to a depth of 8 inches prior to filling providing 90% in-place density. Fill soils will be spread in 6- to 8-inch loose lifts and contain 115% to 125% of optimum moisture content and then recompacted to more than 90% of the maximum density. ASTM D1557 or equivalent shall be used to evaluate the maximum density of all fill soils. Onsite soils as encountered are considered suitable for use as compacted fill, provided that all debris and any material larger than six (6) inches in diameter is screened out and eliminated from the fill.

5.2.3 Shrinkage
An average shrinkage factor of 10-15% should be anticipated for recompaction of near-surface soils.

Page 863 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 9

5.3 Building Foundations
All footings for any proposed structure shall bear a minimum of 24 inches into certified compacted fill soils for the support of up to three (3) stories, measured relative to lowest adjacent grade. Footings shall be a minimum of 18 inches wide, with pad footings a minimum of 18 inches wide in each plan direction. All footings shall have an allowable bearing capacity of 2,000 psf, with a 15% increase for each additional foot of footing embedment depth and a 10% increase for each additional foot of width to a maximum of 4,000 psf. For temporary loading conditions—specifically seismic, wind, and any included impact loads— axial bearing capacity may be increased by 1/3 of the given values. Total settlement is not anticipated to exceed 0.75 inches, with a maximum differential of 0.4 inches over 25 feet.

Passive resistance may be designed for 250 psf/ft, maximum 3750 psf. The coefficient of friction for concrete poured in direct contact with compacted fill or undisturbed native soil may be taken as 0.35.

Foundations shall be designed in accordance with all applicable codes, but at minimum shall contain two (2) #4 reinforcement bars in both the top and bottom. A grade beam shall be placed across any door opening, and isolated pad footings shall be tied together in two directions.

5.4 Floor Slabs

5.4.1 Office/Hotel Room Areas
Any proposed floor slabs in office areas or other areas of similar use shall be a full four (4) inches thick and reinforced with at minimum #3 rebar, 15 inches on center in each direction, or another equivalent that satisfies both WRI slab design methodology for a non-plastic soil and minimum temperature and shrinkage requirements per ACI 318-14. At a minimum, these slabs shall be cast on four (4) inches of washed concrete sand, with 10-mil visqueen in the center of the sand layer. Alternatively, floor slab underlayment is permitted to consist of 14-mil vapor retarding layer, underlain by four (4) inches of ½ -inch or larger clean aggregate.

5.4.2 Warehouse/Garage Areas
Floor slabs in areas experiencing heavier loading, such as warehouse or garage spaces, shall be five (5) inches thick and reinforced with at minimum #4 rebar, 18 inches on-center in each direction, or another equivalent that satisfies both WRI slab design methodology for a non-plastic soil and minimum temperature and shrinkage requirements per ACI 318-14. At a minimum, these slabs shall be cast on four (4) inches of washed concrete sand, with 10-mil visqueen in the center of the sand layer. Alternatively, floor slab underlayment is permitted to consist of 14-mil vapor retarding layer, underlain by four (4) inches of 1⁄2- inch or larger clean aggregate. Should slab deflection be critical in any areas (e.g., for the support of precision heavy equipment), a configuration-specific design may be necessary.

5.4.3 Slab Subgrade Presaturation
Subgrade soils shall be moistened to a minimum to 120% of optimum moisture prior to pouring concrete slabs to a depth of 18 inches below grade, regardless of initial moisture content. Further, we recommend that floor slabs be scored into maximum 10-foot sections each way, to control cracking.

Page 864 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 10

5.5 Retaining Walls
Cantilever retaining walls (i.e., retaining walls permitted to laterally deflect 0.2% of their height) backfilled with on-site soils shall be designed to accommodate an active pressure of 35 pcf and 51 pcf for level and 2H:1V inclined backfills, respectively. Cantilever retaining walls more than six (6) feet in retained height shall further accommodate a seismic load increment of 22.2 and 37 pcf for level and 2H:1V inclined backfills, respectively, applied as an equivalent fluid. These walls shall assume the foundation design values as provided above.

Cantilever walls should be constructed with separation joints at any wall vertices that exceed a 15-degree angle of departure. If this is not feasible, then any portion of the wall within 1:1 the wall height away from the vertex shall be designed for an at-rest pressure of 60 pcf for level conditions, applied as an equivalent fluid.

5.5.1 Retaining Wall Backfill and Drainage
Regardless of loading condition, all walls shall be backfilled and compacted with approved fill soils in conjunction with the requirements of Section 5.2 above, the attached retaining wall detail, and Appendix C as pertinent. All walls shall provide adequate drainage behind the wall to prevent the accumulation of hydrostatic pressure and/or seepage in the event of increased moisture conditions in the surrounding soils.

5.6 Temporary Excavations
All excavations must comply with current OSHA standards, state, local and federal safety regulations.

Excavations may be vertically cut to three (3) feet, then be sloped at a slope of 1H:1V. Surcharge loading, including stockpiled soil, should be placed 1:1 the excavation height back from the top of the excavation.

Configuration-specific analysis and recommendations (slots, cuts, etc.) may be necessary depending on excavation staging, should actual field conditions differ or should the proposed design be significantly altered.

Duco Engineering is not the OSHA responsible party; that individual or entity shall verify the safety of the site and working conditions.

5.7 Drainage and Landscaping
All site drainage should be collected and transferred to an approved storm water drainage system. No drainage should pond against any foundation or other structure. Any planned area drains should be recessed below grade to allow the free flow of water into the drain inlet. Landscaping improvements must not cause surface water to collect adjacent to any structure, causing saturated soils adjacent to the foundation. Flatwork and concrete walks should be at an elevation such that they will not obstruct the flow of surface water.

Proper drainage should be maintained at all times. The resident is responsible for proper maintenance, landscaping, and irrigation.

Irrigation methods should promote uniformity of moisture. Overwatering and underwatering must be avoided. Heavy irrigation and inadequate runoff gradients can create moisture problems. Maintaining adequate surface drainage and controlled irrigation will significantly reduce the potential for nuisance-type moisture issues.

5.8 Hardscape
Hardscape improvements are not generally considered structural; however, we do recommend that

Page 865 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 11
overexcavation and recompaction be performed beneath proposed walkways, patios, garden walls, and other landscape features, to minimize the potential for cracking and other phenomena. Areas to receive hardscape should have the upper one (1) foot of approved natural soil or subgrade soil, whichever is deeper, recompacted to a minimum of 90%. Moisture content of subgrade soils should be maintained above optimum moisture. Concrete flatwork should be a minimum full four (4) inches thick, and consideration should be given to reinforcing #3 rebar spaced 18 inches center to center, in compliance with all pertinent governing code sections and design manuals. Control joints shall be provided, a minimum of one (1) inch deep, ten (10) feet on center or closer. All flatwork should be poured independent of any proposed structure and be separated by an expansion joint (felt). Additionally, it is recommended that all flatwork be constructed so that a minimum of ½ inch exists between the concrete flatwork and structures, such as residential buildings, retaining walls and sound privacy walls. Flatwork and concrete walks should be at an elevation such that they will not obstruct the flow of surface water.

5.9 Pavement Design
Given an R-Value of 66, asphalt pavement sections shall comply with the following minimum specifications:

Table 2: Asphalt Pavement Design Sections
Use Traffic Index (TI) HMA Thickness Base Thickness
Parking Stalls, Light Duty 4.0 2.5 in 4.0 in
Main Drive Aisle, Heavy Duty 5.5 3.0 in 4.0 in

Rigid concrete pavement sections shall comply with the following minimum specifications:

Table 3: PCC Pavement Design Sections
Use Traffic Index (TI) Concrete Thickness Base Thickness Parking Stalls, Light Duty 4.0 5.0 in 4.0 in
Main Drive Aisle, Heavy Duty 5.5 6.0 in 4.0 in

Prior to paving, the upper two (2) feet of subgrade shall be cleaned of any trash, vegetation, or other debris, and compacted to more than 90% relative compaction. Base material shall consist of crushed aggregate base in general accordance with the Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM) and shall be compacted to more than 95% relative compaction prior to placing the asphalt course.

5.10 Stormwater Infiltration
Following the field testing, the raw data was converted to an equivalent infiltration rate per Los Angeles County Standards, with the final three (3) readings averaged. The stabilized field infiltration rates for each boring are as follows:
]

Page 866 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 12
Table 4: Minimum Field Infiltration Rates for Each Boring Based on the results of the field testing, we recommend the following design infiltration rates based on depth, with safety factors evaluated in accordance with County of Los Angeles standards:

Infiltration
Depth Field Rate Test Reduction Factor
(RFT)
Site Variability
Factor
(RFV)
Siltation/Maintenance
Factor
(RFS)
Total RF,
RFT x RFV x RFS Design Rate
0-20 ft 2.67 in/hr 1.5 1 2.0* 3.0* 0.89 in./hr.
20-50 ft 9.05 in/hr 1.5 1 2.0* 3.0* 3.02 in/hr
These values assume a moderate level of pretreatment and regular maintenance. The project civil engineer may, at their discretion, reduce the siltation/maintenance safety factor (*) should the WQMP include more extensive regular maintenance and effective pretreatment.

Infiltration basin inverts shall be set back a minimum of 15 feet from any slope or building structure and shall be located outside a 1:1 diagonal plane up from the bottom of any adjacent footing, in addition to all other pertinent state and local setback requirements.

Boring Material Tested Field Infiltration Rate, I
I-1 SM, 0-10’ 2.73 in/hr
I-2 SP-SM, 20-25’ 9.05 in/hr

Page 867 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 13

6.0 SUMMARY & CLOSURE

6.1 Design Review
As a condition of the validity of the recommendations made herein, the working and final designs, upon completion, shall be provided to this firm for review, comment, and approval as appropriate. Should the proposed scope of work differ from that proposed as of the time of this evaluation, then further geotechnical work may be necessary to provide accurate recommendations for the design and construction of the development.

6.2 Project Oversight and Inspection
Site preparation, fill material removal and recompaction, and foundation and soil preparation for construction shall be reviewed by a geotechnical engineer during the grading and construction process.

Inspection of the completed foundation excavations shall be performed by a member of this firm, prior to the placement of any forms or reinforcement, to ensure conformance with the proposed design and design criteria. These additional services are not a part of this report and are provided at an additional cost.

6.3 Closure
The findings in this report are based and prepared in accordance with pertinent state and local building and design codes, as well as generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No other warranty, guarantee, or assurance is expressed or implied. This firm is not responsible for work performed outside of its responsible charge as defined in the California Professional Engineers Act and governing board rules or work for which this firm’s recommendations were not adhered to or for which this firm was not provided the opportunity of oversight, comment, and/or inspection.

Should you have any questions regarding this report of the recommendations contained herein, please contact this office.

Page 868 of 1264 ends

Job No. 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page 14

7.0 REFERENCES
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2015). ASCE/SEI 7-16: Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures.

California Building Standards Commission. (2019). 2019 California Building Code, Title 24, Pat 2 (Volumes 1 & 2).

California Department of Water Resources (2022). “SGMA Data Viewer”. <sgma.water.ca.gov>.

California Geological Survey. (1998). “Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Baldwin Park Quadrangle”.

California Geological Survey. (1998). “Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Baldwin Park 7.5-Minute Quadrangle”.

California Geological Survey (2008). Special Publication 117A: Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards/
Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (2022). “Groundwater Wells”. < https://dpw.lacounty.gov/general/wells/>.

County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. (2021). “GS200.1: Guidelines for Geotechnical Investigation and Reporting, Low Impact Development Stormwater Infiltration”.

Lund and Associates Engineering, Inc. (2022, April 13). “Grading Plan, Deluxe Hot Rods, APN 0276-014- 24, Colton, CA 92324”.

Structural Engineers Association of California. (2022). “Seismic Design Maps”. <seismicmaps.org>.

United States Geological Survey. (2022). “EarthExplorer”. <earthexplorer.usgs.gov>.

United States Geological Survey. (2022). “U.S. Quaternary Faults”. <https://usgs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=5a6038b3a1684561a9b0aaaa884 12fcf>.

Page 869 of 1264 ends

Job No.: 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page A-1
A. APPENDIX: MAPS, LOGS

Page 870 of 1264 ends

BORING MAP
Plan as provided by client. Locations are approximate and based on field measurements and sighting to distinguishable land features.

MEW PL
2 & B 1
ip
4 4
3 23074
LOT 9
578 N AZUSA
COVINA. CA 91722
i F¥— 4
MEW PL
GLENTANA ST SITE PLAN ©

GLENTANA STREET
A
p__4 I____4
-£P ’ Boring/Infiltration Test Location
A o’ 40’

DUCO ENGINEERING
Proposed Hotel
578 N. Azusa Ave.

Covina, CA 91722
Job No.:
22-075
Date:
8/29/22
Scale:
1”=30’
Figure:
1

Page 871 of 1264 ends

0 5
10 15
20 25
30 2,2,4
3,5,8
5,10,12
7,9,11
A SM 1.5", Asphalt concrete, very weathered

1.5"-, SILTY FINE SAND, brown, damp, moderately firm, little to no gravel, moist at 5'
T.D 11.5', EOB

7.8 9.9

8.7 9.8

98.0 100.6
103.2
103.8

80.8 83.1

85.2 85.7

SOIL EXPLORATION LOG
PROJECT: Proposed Hotel Development JOB NO.: 22-075 TEST HOLE NO.: 1 CLIENT: Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC DATE: 8/10/22
LOCATION: See plan ELEVATION: 496.1
LOGGED BY: JC EXCAVATING EQUIPMENT: 8" dia. Hollow Stem Auger DEPTH TO WATER: none CAVING: none
SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS:

This log is part of the report prepared by Duco Engineering, Inc. for this project and should be read together with the report. This summary applies only to the location of the test hole at the time of the excavation. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered.

DUCO ENGINEERING, INC. FIGURE NO.: 2 DEPTH (feet) SAMPLE BLOW COUNTS SOIL TYPE G RAPHIC LOG USCS DESCRIPTION FIELD MOIST. % OF DRY WT.

SAMPLE DATA DRY DEN. Lb./Cu. Ft. %COMP

Page 872 of 1264 ends

0 5
10 15
20 25
30 1
1,2,3
2,2,2
2,2,2
23,25,29
17,50
A
B
A
SM
SPSM
SWSM
SM

1.5", Asphalt weathered

1.5"-18.5', SILTY FINE SAND, brown, damp, moderately firm below 4', moist at 15'

18.5'-29', SILTY COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL,grey-brown,
mottled, very firm, damp
29-31', SILTY SAND LENS, brown, damp

8.9 9.0

7.4 11.1

2.7 2.4

SOIL EXPLORATION LOG
PROJECT: Proposed Hotel Development JOB NO.: 22-075 TEST HOLE NO.: 2 CLIENT: Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC DATE: 8/10/22
LOCATION: See plan ELEVATION: 496.3
LOGGED BY: JC EXCAVATING EQUIPMENT: Hollow stem auger
DEPTH TO WATER: none CAVING: none
SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS:

DUCO ENGINEERING, INC. FIGURE NO.: 3 DEPTH (feet) SAMPLE BLOW COUNTS SOIL TYPE G RAPHIC LOG USCS DESCRIPTION FIELD MOIST. % OF DRY WT.

SAMPLE DATA DRY DEN. Lb./Cu. Ft. %COMP
:
r
:
rrr
i: i c:
m: M.f.:
t r i:
m: C i _ I •
t V7:
l r i:
f -i
r r. ]:
|; L. j •
m:
r. "i / r
m :

Page 873 of 1264 ends

30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 6,15,22
21,41,40
50 41,50
50 B
B
SPSM
SPSM
31'+, SILTY COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL, tan- to grey-brown, very firm, damp
T.D. 50.5' EOB

5.1 2.7

3.0 2.5

2.5 SOIL EXPLORATION LOG
PROJECT: Proposed Hotel Development JOB NO.: 22-075 TEST HOLE NO.: 2 DUCO ENGINEERING, INC. FIGURE NO.: 3 DEPTH (feet) SAMPLE BLOW COUNTS SOIL TYPE G RAPHIC LOG USCS DESCRIPTION FIELD MOIST. % OF DRY WT.

SAMPLE DATA DRY DEN. Lb./Cu. Ft. %COMP
I. i
l JI-1 h
L

Page 874 of 1264 ends

0 5
10 15
20 25
30 1,1,1
2,4,5
6,8,8
4,6,7
5,7,10
9,4,37
A
B
SM
SM
SPSM
SPSM
0-21.33', SILTY FINE SAND, tan, dry-damp, soft to moderately firm,

21.33', silty coarse sand with gravel
T.D. 26.5' EOB

3.9 4.3

5.0 3.4

2.7 1.9

SOIL EXPLORATION LOG
PROJECT: Proposed Hotel Development JOB NO.: 22-075 TEST HOLE NO.: 3 CLIENT: Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC DATE: 8/10/22
LOCATION: See plan ELEVATION: 498.5
LOGGED BY: JC EXCAVATING EQUIPMENT: Hollow stem auger
DEPTH TO WATER: none CAVING: none
SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS:

DUCO ENGINEERING, INC. FIGURE NO.: 4 DEPTH (feet) SAMPLE BLOW COUNTS SOIL TYPE G RAPHIC LOG USCS DESCRIPTION FIELD MOIST. % OF DRY WT.

SAMPLE DATA DRY DEN. Lb./Cu. Ft. %COMP
::
r
r
r

Page 875 of 1264 ends

0 5
10 15
20 25
30 7,5,11
4,5,9
14,25,29
14,17,26
7,11,14
9,40,37
A
B
SM
SPSM
0-18.5', SILTY FINE SAND, tan, soft to moderately firm, dry to damp

18.5'-25', SILTY COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL,grey-brown,
mottled, very firm, damp
T.D. 25' EOB

4.2 2.8

3.9 4.3

3.3 1.8
102.1
105.3
104.5
106.3
107.0
109.6

84.3 87.0

86.3 87.8

88.4 SOIL EXPLORATION LOG
PROJECT: Proposed Hotel Development JOB NO.: 22-075 TEST HOLE NO.: 4 CLIENT: Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC DATE: 8/10/22
LOCATION: See plan ELEVATION: 498.0
LOGGED BY: JC EXCAVATING EQUIPMENT: Hollow stem auger
DEPTH TO WATER: none CAVING: none
SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS:

DUCO ENGINEERING, INC. FIGURE NO.: 5 DEPTH (feet) SAMPLE BLOW COUNTS SOIL TYPE G RAPHIC LOG USCS DESCRIPTION FIELD MOIST. % OF DRY WT.

SAMPLE DATA DRY DEN. Lb./Cu. Ft. %COMP
I
I
t J-1: r j.t:

Page 876 of 1264 ends

Job No.: 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page B-1
B. APPENDIX: FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING
B1.0 Laboratory Test Procedures
Laboratory tests were performed in general accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other suggested methods. Test procedures are explained below:

B1.1 Shear Strength
Shear strength characteristics of subsurface soils were evaluated by direct shear testing, in conformance with ASTM D3080. In this method, three (3) or more soil samples (either in-place or remolded to replicate observed or anticipated field conditions) are submerged and consolidated under unique normal loads. After consolidating, each sample is sheared at a constant rate (strain controlled) in a shear box, with shear resistance and displacement measured, recorded, and analyzed. The samples were tested in a 2.5-inch O.D. circular shear box, using a controlled displacement rate of 0.0250-inch per minute in general accordance with ASTM D3080.

B1.2 Settlement
Settlement characteristics of representative samples were evaluated by means of laboratory consolidation tests. Samples were tested in a consolidometer using a dead weight lever system for load application in general accordance with ASTM D2435.

B1.3 Expansive Index (EI)
Expansion tests were performed on representative surface soils in general accordance with the standard procedure of Expansion Index test ASTM 4829. In this testing procedure, the remolded sample is compacted at 50 percent saturation, and, after remolding, the sample is confined under a pressure of 144 psf. and allowed to soak for twenty-four hours. The resulting volume change due to an increase in moisture content is recorded together along with the initial moisture content and dry density. The corresponding Expansion Index is presented in Appendix B.

B1.4 Corrosivity
Corrosivity tests were previously performed on composite samples to evaluate the pH and electrical resistance of the soils. These tests were reportedly conducted in general accordance with California Test method No. 643. Soluble Chlorides were evaluated in general accordance with California test method No. 422. The concentration of soluble sulfate was also evaluated in general accordance with California test method No. 417. Duco Engineering, Inc. does not practice corrosion engineering. We recommend a competent corrosion engineer be retained to further evaluate and test the site soils, as required, to provide specific corrosion mitigation methods appropriate for the project.

Page 877 of 1264 ends

Job No.: 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page B-2
B2.0 Laboratory Test Results
The results of the laboratory tests are presented on the following tables, and subsequent figures. The moisture content results are indicated on the exploratory boring logs, previously presented in Appendix A.

Table B2.1 Maximum Unit Weight and Expansive Index, and R-Value Soil Type Opt. Moist. Max. Unit Wt. EI R-Value
A—SILTYSAND, brown (B-1, 0-4’) 11.6% 121.1 pcf 29 66
Table B2.2 Corrosive Properties
Soil Type Soluble Sulfate
(CA 417)
Soluble Chloride
(CA 422)
Min. Resistivity
(CA 643)
pH
A (B-3, 0-3’) 160 ppm 44 ppm 3600 ohm-cm 7.4

Page 878 of 1264 ends

Tested By: AP Checked By: JC
Client: Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC
Project: Proposed Hotel Development
578 N. Azusa Ave.

Source of Sample: 1 Depth: 5
Proj. No.: 22-075 Date Sampled: 8/10/22
Sample Type: Drive Sample
Description: SILTY FINE SAND, brown, damp,
moderately firm, little to no gravel
Specific Gravity= 2.7
Remarks:

Figure 6
Sample No.

Water Content, %
Dry Density, pcf
Saturation, %
Void Ratio
Diameter, in.

Height, in.

Water Content, %
Dry Density, pcf
Saturation, %
Void Ratio
Diameter, in.

Height, in.

Normal Stress, psf
Peak Stress, psf
Strain, %
Ult. Stress, psf
Strain, %
Strain rate, in./min. Initial At Test Shear Stress, psf 0 500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Strain, %
0 5 10 15 20
1 2
3 Ult. Stress, psf Peak Stress, psf
0 1000
2000
3000
Normal Stress, psf
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
C, psf
f, deg
Tan(f)
Peak Ult.
0 28.3

0.54 0

28.1 0.53
1 9.9
100.2

39.1 0.6819

2.42 1.00

25.2 100.2

99.9 0.6819

2.42 1.00
1000
552

8.3 504

8.7 0.010
2 9.9
101.7

40.6 0.6572

2.42 1.00

24.3 101.7
100.0

0.6572

2.42 1.00
2000
1056

10.1 1032

10.3 0.020
3 9.9
105.2

44.3 0.6022

2.42 1.00

22.3 105.2
100.0

0.6022

2.42 1.00
4000
2160

8.7 2160

8.7 0.020
X
k
v¥-
DUCO -Engineering. Inc.-

Page 879 of 1264 ends

Tested By: AP Checked By: JC
CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT Percent Strain
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1
0 -1
-2
Applied Pressure - ksf

0.01 0.1 1 10
Water
Added
Natural Dry Dens. LL PI Sp. Overburden Pc Cc Cs
Swell Press. Clpse.
%
eo Sat. Moist. (pcf) Gr. (ksf) (ksf) (ksf)

38.3 % 9.3 % 101.7 2.7 .01 3.3 0.10 0.01 1.3 0.657
SILTY FINE SAND, brown, damp, moderately firm, little to no gravel 22-075 Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC
Proposed Hotel Development
578 N. Azusa Ave.
7 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS AASHTO
Project No. Client: Remarks:

Project:

Source of Sample: 1 Depth: 10
DUCO -Engineering. Inc.- Figure

Page 880 of 1264 ends

Tested By: AP Checked By: JC
CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT Percent Strain
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1
0 -1
-2
Applied Pressure - ksf

0.01 0.1 1 10
Water
Added
Natural Dry Dens. LL PI Sp. Overburden Pc Cc Cs
Swell Press. Clpse.
%
eo Sat. Moist. (pcf) Gr. (ksf) (ksf) (ksf)

19.5 % 4.2 % 106.7 2.7 .01 3.0 0.09 0.01 0.9 0.580
SILTY COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL,grey-brown, mottled, very firm, damp 22-075 Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC
Proposed Hotel Development
578 N. Azusa Ave.
8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS AASHTO
Project No. Client: Remarks:

Project:

Source of Sample: 4 Depth: 20
DUCO -Engineering. Inc.- Figure

Page 881 of 1264 ends

BORING INFILTRATION

TEST LOG

DUCO ENGINEERING
Fig No. 9
Project: Job No.: 21-080
Address: Date: 8/27/21
Test No: 1 50 ft+ Soak Start: 7:17
Tech: JC Soak End: 7:47
Depth: 10 0.5-6 ft 1 ft drop time 22 seconds
Diameter: 8 Sounder 10/30 min? 10
Soil Type: SM Notes:

Pipe Dia: 2
Start Time Dur. (min) d1 (in). d2 (in). Vol (in^3) Area (in^2) Rate (in/hr) 7:48 10 24 45.5 472.8 2142.6 1.32
7:58 10 23.75 55.25 692.7 2023.2 2.05
8:08 10 26.25 68.375 926.4 1826.8 3.04
8:19 10 24.5 70 1000.6 1828.4 3.28
8:29 10 24 65.75 918.1 1888.1 2.92
8:39 10 24.75 63.625 854.9 1905.4 2.69
8:50 10 24.25 63 852.2 1919.5 2.66
9:00 10 26 62 791.7 1910.1 2.49
9:12 10 23.25 63 874.2 1932.1 2.71
9:22 10 25.5 61.25 786.2 1925.8 2.45
9:32 10 24.25 63.25 857.7 1916.4 2.69
9:43 10 24.875 62.25 821.9 1921.1 2.57
9:54 10 23.25 64.75 912.6 1910.1 2.87
10:05 10 24.75 64.25 868.7 1897.5 2.75
Test No: 2 50 ft+ Soak Start: 7:28
Tech: JC Soak End: 7:58
Depth: 25 0.5-6 ft 1 ft drop time 48 seconds
Diameter: 8 Sounder 10/30 min? 10
Soil Type: SM Notes:

Pipe Dia: 2
Start Time Dur. (min) d1 (in). d2 (in). Vol (in^3) Area (in^2) Rate (in/hr) 8:00 10 241.5 295 1176.5 798.0 8.85
8:11 10 240.75 297.2 1241.4 779.7 9.55
8:22 10 239 300 1341.5 766.5 10.50
8:34 10 240.5 300 1308.5 747.7 10.50
8:45 10 240.875 300 1300.2 743.0 10.50
8:57 10 242.375 300 1267.2 724.1 10.50
9:08 10 241.5 296.5 1209.5 779.1 9.31
9:19 10 239.75 294.75 1209.5 823.1 8.82
9:31 10 240.625 295.25 1201.3 805.8 8.94
9:42 10 238.5 294.875 1239.8 837.2 8.88
9:54 10 241.25 295.25 1187.5 798.0 8.93
10:05 10 240 296 1231.5 804.2 9.19
10:16 10 240.625 295.5 1206.8 802.7 9.02
Depth to Water Table:

Depth top BMP Invert:

Tested Depths:

Measurement Method:
bottom sealed with bentonite
interval from 8:22-8:57 ran dry
Tested Depths:

Measurement Method:
bottom sealed with bentonite
Proposed Infiltration Basin
578 N. Azusa Ave. Covina
Depth to Water Table:

Depth top BMP Invert:

Page 882 of 1264 ends

DUCO ENGINEERING
Fig No.: 10
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 1:00 1:15 1:30 1:45 2:00 2:15 2:30 2:45 FIeld Infiltration Rate (in/hr)
Elapsed Time Following 1-hour Pre-soak (hr:min)
Infiltration Study Field Rates
Test 1
A A Test 2
A
w

Page 883 of 1264 ends

Job No.: 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page C-1
C. APPENDIX: GENERAL GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS
All grading, including cuts, fills, overexcavations, etc., shall be conducted under the oversight of this firm, and shall be in accordance with the recommendations and provisions of the current California Building Code and any additionally governing design or construction codes, including local regulations. The following should be considered general recommendations; recommendations in the main body test of this report shall be adhered to where they differ from those given below.

C.1 Structural Fills
Structural fills shall not be founded on any loose, disturbed, uncertified, and/or unapproved material.

Structural fills are generally defined as any fill materials placed in the support of any building or earth structure, including buildings, swimming pools, retaining walls, fill slopes, etc. Structural fills may only be founded on approved native material (i.e., alluvium or bedrock) or certified compacted fill. Typically, no topsoil or colluvium shall remain below any structural fills.

C.2 Overexcavation
Unless otherwise specified, overexcavation of surface soils as required shall extend into approved native material and/or certified compacted fill, penetrating all loose, disturbed and/or unsuitable soils per the direction of the geotechnical engineer or subsequent representative. Overexcavation shall extend laterally outside the building footprint (a) 5 feet, or (b) a distance equal to the depth of adjacent excavation, whichever is greater. Areas where this requirement cannot be met (i.e., adjacent property lines, structures, etc.) shall be reviewed for by this firm on a case-by-case basis. Minimum depth of overexcavation shall be specified by this firm but should (unless specified otherwise) extend two (2) feet below the proposed footing bottom elevation(s) if the removal of unsuitable surface materials will not already extend to that depth.

C.3 Fill Placement
All fill materials placed under the direction of this firm shall be placed as a compacted fill, with a relative compaction of at least 90% with respect to the maximum dry unit weight evaluated in accordance with ASTM D1557, unless otherwise specified at the direction of the municipal authority or this firm (i.e., road base compacted to 95%, deep fills compacted to 93%, etc.). Fill materials shall be moistened or dried back to 115-120% of the optimum moisture content, placed in six (6) to eight (8) inch-thick loose lifts, and compacted with the appropriate equipment. This firm shall test compaction for every two (2) feet of fill thickness, or 1000 cubic yards placed, whichever occurs first.

Page 884 of 1264 ends

Job No.: 22-075 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA Page C-2
C.4 Fill Slopes, Retaining Wall Backfills
Any fill slopes or retaining walls placed shall conform to the design recommendations of this firm, as specified in the geotechnical report and/or respective details, attached herein as pertinent. A subdrain shall be installed at the heel of any geotechnical installation—slope, retaining wall, or otherwise. The contractor and/or client are responsible for verifying that the municipal authority does not have additional, stricter requirements than those specified herein for such construction.

C.5 Grading/Earthwork Inspection
As a condition of grading approval, this firm shall be afforded the opportunity to observe, inspect, and approve all back-cuts, excavation bottoms, subdrains, foundation excavations, and grading operations.

Should in-field conditions differ from those observed during the geotechnical evaluation, revisions to the recommendations made by the geotechnical engineer and/or geologist may become necessary. While governing codes specify minimum required inspections for compacted fill placement, this firm reserves the right to perform such inspections and oversight as frequently as necessary to accept geotechnical responsibility for the work performed in good faith.

Page 885 of 1264 ends

0.75 1
H/2 min.

H
Greater of (1) 6 in. or (2) depth to Competent Native Soil ≥2
1 Mirafi 140N or Equivalent Filter Fabric
Gravel or Crushed Rock, 1 cu. ft./ft. min. 4 in. min. Perforated Pipe, Schedule 40 or Equivalent Select Backfill, granular, SE≥30, ≥90% RC
Fill Cap, ≥90% RC
Swale Recommended for All Wall Installations
12 in.

Approved Native Material
Mirafi 140N or Equivalent Filter Fabric
H
Greater of (1) 6 in. or (2) depth to Competent Native Soil Mirafi 140N or Equivalent Filter Fabric
Gravel or Crushed Rock, 1 cu. ft./ft. min.
4 in. min. Perforated Pipe, Schedule 40 or Equivalent
Approved Backfill Material
2 ft.
14175 Telephone Ave. Ste. K
Chino, CA 91710
909.594.7414
[email protected]

RETAINING WALL

BACKFILL DETAILS
Rev. Date: 08/2017
SHEET TITLE:

DRW/CHK: JC/DD
FIG.

Native/Limited Access Wall Backfill
Select Material Wall Backfill
a
L
/

DUCO ENGINEERING
11 Page 886 of 1264
14175 Telephone Ave. Ste. K | Chino, Ca. 91710 | 909.594.7414 | [email protected] Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC
Attn: Mr. Raj Patel
1011 S. Atlantic Ave.

Compton, CA 90221
October 25, 2022
Job No. 22-075
Subject: Addendum to Geotechnical Report, Rev. 1
Planning Review Response
Proposed Hotel Development
578 N. Azusa Ave.

Covina, CA 91722
Mr. Patel:

At the request of Mr. John Alajov, P.E., we provide the following responses to the comments issued by the City of Covina Planning Department. Review comments are printed above our responses in italics.

1. In Section 3.3, Geologic Summary, of the report, please address the Walnut Creek Fault and add the distance between the Project Site and this fault. Per the City's Safety Element, the City includes two potentially active earthquake faults: 1) the Indian Hill Fault, which runs through a portion of the northeastern section of the City, and 2) the Walnut Creek Fault, which traverses southeastern Covina along Walnut Creek.

The Walnut Creek Fault strikes northeast to southwest some 3.4 km southeast of the subject site. While this fault is considered potentially active, comparatively little is known about its slip rate or potential ground motions, and the USGS considers its mapping certainty poor, based solely on inferred mapping by Morton and Miller (2003). Consequently, the Walnut Creek Fault is not considered a source fault by the National Seismic Hazard Mapping Program (NSHMP).
1b. Does the USGS also consider the Indian Hill Fault, which is much closer to the Project Site, to have poor mapping certainty? Is the Indian Hill Fault also not considered a source fault by the NSHMP? Neither fault is considered a source fault by the current (2014) edition of the NSHMP sources, though the Indian Hill Fault is mapped with more certainty and is considered to be a more recently active fault trace (late Quaternary). However, despite its heavily inferred nature, the Walnut Creek Fault will be included within the 2023 edition of the NSHMP source database.

2. Please incorporate discussion regarding the drywell ground infiltration system as it is to be installed to a depth of 40 feet below grade.

DUCO ENGINEERING

Page 887 of 1264 ends

Duco Engineering, Inc. Job No. 22-075 Page 2
The scope of our site evaluation included boring to 50.5 feet below grade to verify subsurface soil conditions—greater than 10 feet deeper than the maximum proposed drywell depth. Soils encountered below a depth of 18.5 to 21 feet were consistently observed to be granular materials, with coarseness and oversized content generally increasing with depth, which has a near universal positive correlation with infiltration rate. As such, the tested values provided in our report are sufficiently conservative to account for use in the design of a 40-foot drywell. Provided that such a drywell complies with the appropriate requirements and setbacks as outlined in the Los Angeles County LID Manual and administrative publication GS200.1, such a drywell should be safe and adequate for its intended use.

Should you have any questions regarding this report of the recommendations contained herein, please contact this office.

Sincerely,
James D. Collett, PE
References:

Duco Engineering, Inc. (2022, August 24). “Geotechnical Evaluation Report, Proposed Commercial Development, 578 N. Azusa Ave., Covina, CA 91722”.

United States Geological Survey. (2022). “U.S. Quaternary Faults”. <usgs.maps.arcgis.com>.

Page 888 of 1264 ends

APPENDIX D
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Addendum

Page 889 of 1264 ends

0. ♦
PIC A
>
l~
0 PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
A DIVISION OF PETROLEUM INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.
2619 Sierra Way, La Verne, CA 91750
Phone: (909) 593-2427 - Cell: (909) 450-1703
Email: [email protected]

PHASE I

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT

PREPARED FOR

RAJ PATEL

SHERMAN OAKS INN, LLC
1011 SOUTH ATLANTIC AVENUE
COMPTON, CA 90221

CONCERNING COMMERCIAL

PROPERTY AT
542 - 580 NORTH AZUSA AVENUE
845 - 867 WEST GLENTANA STREET
COVINA, CA 91722
JUNE 15,2022

PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
2619 SIERRA WAY
LA VERNE, CA 91750

Page 890 of 1264 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TEXT PAGE
Introduction............................................................................................................................................... 1 Scope of Investigation...............................................................................................................................1 Site Inspection........................................................................................................................................... 1 Site Description......................................................................................................................................... 2 Site History................................................................................................................................................ 2 Survey of Adjacent Properties...................................................................................................................3 Historical Aerial Photograph Review........................................................................................................3 Government Records Review....................................................................................................................4 Geology and Hydrogeology....................................................................................................................... 9 Conclusions and Recommendations..........................................................................................................9

DISPLAYS
Figure 1: Site Location and Topographic Map
Figure 2: Site Map
Figure 3: Groundwater Contour Map
Figure 4: Oil and Gas Map
Figure 5: Asbestos Reference Display
Figure 6: Landfill Map
Appendix A: Title Information
Appendix B: Site Photos
Appendix C: City Permit Records
Appendix D: Historic Topographic Maps
Appendix E: Historic Aerial Photographs
Appendix F: City Directory Report
Appendix G: EDR Report
Appendix H: Resumes

Page 891 of 1264 ends

^'
RDV
<y <\
A
>
D
0-
♦
PIC r
♦

PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
A DIVISION OF PETROLEUM INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.
2619 Sierra Way, La Verne, CA 91750
909/593-2427 Cell: 909/450-1703
June 15, 2022

INTRODUCTION
PIC Environmental Services (PIC) was contracted by Raj Patel to perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (PESA) at commercial property located in Covina, California (see Figure 1). The purpose of this investigation was to determine if environmental impairments existed at the site. This document represents the PESA report prepared in accordance with customary industry practices and current ASTM (2013) Standards. This document also intends to satisfy the “All Appropriate Inquiries” guidelines established by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The following sources were used to prepare this report:

1. Site Inspection

2. California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) records

3. California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Site Mitigation Division records

4. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Geological Society (USGS) records

5. California Department of Natural Resources (CDNR),
Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) records (now CalGEM)

6. Los Angeles County Waste Discharge Systems records of active and inactive landfills

7. EDR collection of historic aerial photographs

8. Los Angeles County UST and Hazardous Materials Permit Records

9. Los Angeles County Title Records

10. Historic Telephone Directories
11 City of Covina Permit Records

SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION
The scope of this investigation included: site inspection, survey of adjacent properties, review of the above listed government records, review of historical aerial photographs, and geologic and hydrogeologic information search.

SITE INSPECTION
On May 31, 2022, PIC Senior Geologist, Ethan Hersch, conducted site inspections at the subject property and adjacent/nearby properties. Manny Vitela (property manager) assisted PIC with the inspections and provided historical information.

Page 892 of 1264 ends

Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street
Covina, CA 91722
June 15,2022

Page 2 ends

SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject property includes about 35309 square feet of property located east of Azusa Avenue and north of Glentana Street in Covina, CA.

Historic addresses used at the property appear to include 542 through 580 North Azusa Avenue and 845 through 867 West Glentana Street in Covina, CA 91722. The site was occupied by Alltech Auto Sales and Romilda Tax Services at the time of PIC’s Inspection. The Los Angeles County Assessor Parcel Numbers are 8432-006-015 and 8432-006-017. Additional title information is attached in Appendix A.

Property boundaries are indicated by public streets to the south and west and adjoining commercial developments to the north and east. Figure 2 and photographs in Appendix B illustrate features observed onsite by PIC. The subject property does contain permanent structural improvements. Structural improvements include three adjoining commercial (office) buildings. City Permit Records in Appendix C and County title records indicate the buildings were constructed in the early 1960s. Historic aerial photos indicate a commercial building may have been present onsite in the 1950s.

Because the onsite buildings were constructed prior to 1980, asbestos containing construction materials (ACM) may be present. A reference diagram of common ACM in older structures is illustrated on Figure 5.

PIC’s inspection and review of historic records found no evidence of underground storage tanks, clarifiers, surface staining or other significant environmental impairments at the property.

SITE HISTORY
Based on a review of regulatory records, County title records, historic telephone directories, historic topographic maps, and historic aerial photos, it appears the subject property was initially used for agricultural purposes (citrus orchard) as early as 1928 (see Appendix E). A residential dwelling appears to have been constructed onsite by the early 1950s. The existing commercial buildings were constructed in the early 1960s replacing the former citrus orchard and residence. The eastern parcel appears to have remained undeveloped historically. Historic telephone directories document occupation of the property by numerous commercial listings since the late 1950s. Historic occupants include insurance offices, dental offices, financial service offices, a tree service, contractors offices, tax services, a catering business, real estate offices, a termite contractor, travel agencies, auto sales businesses, and other office businesses.

In conclusion, PIC found no historical evidence that the subject property contained subsurface structures or facilities used to process, store, or discharge petroleum or hazardous substances. Historic use of the property for a citrus orchard was conducted during the potential use of organochlorine pesticides. PIC has considerable experience with pesticide soil testing throughout Southern California. It is very unlikely that elevated concentrations of pesticide residue accumulated in soil onsite. Moreover, grading operations prior to construction of the existing buildings would have mixed surface and shallow soils As a result, PIC’s review of historic records and permit documents found no evidence of significant environmental concerns (Recognized Environmental Conditions) at the subject property.

E4441 Phase I PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Page 893 of 1264 ends

Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street
Covina, CA 91722
June 15,2022

Page 3 ends

SURVEY OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES
Commercial developments were observed on adjoining and nearby properties.

None of the adjacent properties exhibited obvious evidence of petroleum or hazardous materials contamination problems. In addition, the EDR Report in Appendix G discovered no adjacent or nearby properties with significant, historic environmental concerns. As a result, there is no evidence the subject property was impacted by subsurface contamination released at nearby properties.

Surface runoff at all surrounding properties appeared to be southwesterly parallel to the nearby San Dimas Wash.

No evidence of historic or improper waste disposal was observed by PIC in any storm drain at the site.

HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW
Historical aerial photographs provided by EDR were reviewed by PIC (see copies in Appendix E).

Available photographs were dated 1928, 1938, 1948, 1954, 1964, 1970, 1977, 1981, 1983, 1990, 2002, 2005, 2009, 2012, 2016, and 2021.

The 1928, 1938, and 1948 photos indicate the property contained a citrus orchard and was undeveloped and unoccupied. Azusa Avenue had been constructed adjacent to the site by 1928.

By 1954, an apparent residence had been constructed on the property. Many of the citrus trees had been removed.

By 1964, the existing commercial buildings had been constructed on the western parcel. Subsequent photos exhibit similar features.

The 2021 photo has been enlarged and reproduced as Figure 2 for reference.

The aerial photo study indicates no obvious environmental impairments on the subject property or from adjacent properties. The aerial photo search did not indicate any oil well drilling or landfill activity on the site.

E444I Phase [ PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Page 894 of 1264 ends

Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street
Covina, CA 91722
June 15,2022

Page 4 ends

GOVERNMENT RECORDS REVIEW
The following federal, state, and local public records and associated lists were searched to determine the potential for or existence of onsite and/or offsite unauthorized releases of hazardous materials (i.e., contamination) related to onsite and/or offsite aboveground or underground storage tanks, or any other potential sources:

FEDERAL SOURCES
NPL National Priority List
PROPOSED NPL Proposed National Priority List
DELISTED NPL National Priority List Deletions
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
CERCLIS (SEMS) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
CERCLIS - NFRAP (SEMS) CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls
DOD Department of Defense Sites
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfield Sites
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
ROD Records of Decision
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
ODI Open Dump Inventory
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
FITS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Control Act)
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
PADS PCB Activity Database System
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
DEBRIS REGION 9 Illegal Dumping Sites Listing
MCS Military Cleanup Sites
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
MINES Mines Master Index File
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
LUCIS Land Use Control Information
ECHO Enforcement and Compliance History Information
E4441 Phase I PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Page 895 of 1264 ends

Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street
Covina, CA 91722
June 15,2022

Page 5 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND LOS ANGELES COUNTY SOURCES
RESPONSE State DTSC Response Sites
AWP

CALSITES
CA BOND EXP. PLAN
NFA
NFE
REF
SCH

TOXIC PITS

AO CONCERN

SWF/LF (SWIS)
CA WDS

WMUDS/SWAT

CORTESE
SWRCY
LUST

CA FID UST
SLIC
SLIC REG 9
UST

HIST UST
AST

SWEEPS UST
CHMIRS
NOTIFY 65
DEED
LIENS
VCP

DRYCLEANERS
W1P
CDL
HAZNET

LA CO HMS
EMI

ENVIROSTOR
NPDES
CERS
HWTS
Annual Work Plan Sites
Calsites Database
Bond Expenditure Plan
No Further Action Determination
Properties Needing Further Evaluation
Unconfirmed Properties Referred to Another Agency
School Property Evaluation Program
Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
Areas of Concern with Groundwater Contamination
Solid Waste Information System
Waste Discharge System
Waste Management Unit Database
“Cortese” Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List
Recycler Database
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report
Facility Inventory Database
Statewide SLIC Cases
Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Active UST Facilities
Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database
Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
SWEEPS UST Listing
California Hazardous Material Incident Report System
Proposition 65 Records
Deed Restriction Listing
Environmental Liens Listing
Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties
Cleaner Facilities
Well Investigation Program Case List
Clandestine Drug Labs
Facility and Manifest Data
Los Angeles County Hazardous Materials Permits
Emissions Inventory Data
DTSC Database
NPDES Permits Listing
California Environmental Reporting System
Hazardous Waste Tracking System

TRIBAL RECORDS

INDIAN RESERV

INDIAN LUST

INDIAN UST
Indian Reservations
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
E4441 Phase I PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Page 896 of 1264 ends

Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street
Covina, CA 91722
June 15,2022

Page 6 ends

EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
MANUFACTURED GAS PLANTS EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR HISTORICAL AUTO STATIONS Historic Gas Stations
EDR HISTORICAL CLEANERS EDR Proprietary Historic Drycleaners All of the above records were examined for up to a one-mile radius by EDR (see Appendix G). The subject property does not appear on any of the lists.

The EDR record search also revealed that nine (9) sites exist within a one-half mile radius of the subject property which have sustained soil and/or groundwater contamination as a result of an underground storage tank leak. Please refer to the Executive Summary in Appendix G for the Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) list. PIC has confirmed that all of the LUST sites have received regulatory closure after completing required remedial actions. As a result, it is not likely the property has been impacted by offsite LUST sources.

Finally, the EDR record search revealed the following concerning properties located within a one mile radius of the subject site:

GOVERNMENT

RECORDS
Federal
SEARCH
RADIUS
(miles)

NUMBER OF
SITES
NPL 1 0
PROPOSED NPL 1 0
DELISTED NPL 1 0
NPL LIENS SITE ONLY 0
CERCLIS (SEMS) 0.5 0
CERCLIS NFRAP (SEMS) 0.5 1
CORRACTS 1 1
RCRA - TSD 0.5 1
RCRA - Lg Gen 0.25 1
RCRA - Sm Gen 0.25 11
ERNS SITE ONLY 0
HMIRS SITE ONLY 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.5 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.5 0
DOD 1 0
FUDS 1 0
US BROWNFIELDS 0.5 0
CONSENT 1 0
ROD 1 0
UMTRA 0.5 0
ODI 0.5 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.5 0
MCS SITE ONLY 0
TRIS SITE ONLY 0
TSCA SITE ONLY 0
FTTS SITE ONLY 0
E4441 Phase I PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Page 897 of 1264 ends

Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street
Covina, CA 91722
June 15,2022

Page 7 ends

GOVERNMENT

RECORDS
Federal
SEARCH
RADIUS
(miles)

NUMBER OF
SITES
SSTS SITE ONLY 0
ICIS SITE ONLY 0
PADS SITE ONLY 0
MLTS SITE ONLY 0
MINES 0.25 0
FINDS SITE ONLY 0
RAATS SITE ONLY 0
RADINFO SITE ONLY 0
LUCIS 0.5 0
ECHO SITE ONLY 0

GOVERNMENT

RECORDS
State and Local
SEARCH
RADIUS
(miles)

NUMBER OF
SITES
RESPONSE 1 0
AWP 1 0
CAL-SITES 1 0
BOND EXP 1 0
NFA 0.25 0
NFE 0.25 0
REF 0.25 0
SCH 0.25 0
TOXIC PITS 1 0
AO CONCERN 1 0
LANDFILLS 0.5 0
WDS SITE ONLY 0
SWAT 0.5 0
CORTESE 0.5 9
SWRCY 0.5 0
LUST 0.5 9
UST 0.25 3
SLIC 0.5 0
UST 0.25 3
HIST UST 0.25 12
AST 0.25 0
SWEEPS UST 0.25 7
CHMIRS SITE ONLY 0
NOTIFY 65 1 1
DEED 0.5 0
LIENS SITE ONLY 0
VCP 0.5 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.25 4
WIP 0.25 1
CDL SITE ONLY 0
E4441 Phase I PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Page 898 of 1264 ends

Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street
Covina, CA 91722
June 15,2022

Page 8 ends

GOVERNMENT

RECORDS
State and Local
SEARCH
RADIUS
(miles)

NUMBER OF
SITES
HAZNET SITE ONLY 0
LA CO HMS SITE ONLY 0
EMI SITE ONLY 0
NPDES SITE ONLY 0
ENVIROSTOR 1 2
CERS 0.25 17
HWTS SITE ONLY 0

GOVERNMENT SEARCH NUMBER OF

RECORDS RADIUS SITES
Tribal (miles)
INDIAN RESERV 1 0
INDIAN LUST 0.5 0
INDIAN UST 0.25 0

GOVERNMENT SEARCH NUMBER OF

RECORDS RADIUS SITES
EDR (miles)
MAN. GAS PLANTS 1 1
HIST AUTO STATIONS 0.25 5
HIST CLEANERS 0.25 2
Historic Oil and Gas Drilling Activity
Based on a review of State Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) records (now CalGEM), it appears that no historic oil production or exploratory oil well drilling activity has ever occurred on or within one-mile of the subject site. Figure 4 illustrates a lack of historic oil well drilling activity near the subject property. PIC concludes the property has not been impacted by historic oil well drilling activity.

Solid Waste Disposal Sites
The Los Angeles County Solid Waste Management Department provides a public index of Solid Waste and Liquid Industrial Waste Disposal Sites (see Figure 6). The EDR Report in Appendix G also includes a review of listings concerning landfills. Los Angeles County records and the EDR report both indicate that no landfills have been located on or near the subject property.

It appears the subject property has not been impacted historically by landfill activity.

E4441 Phase 1 PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Page 899 of 1264 ends

Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street
Covina, CA 91722
June 15,2022

Page 9 ends

GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
The elevation of the site is approximately 493 feet above sea level. The surrounding topography generally slopes southwesterly parallel to the nearby San Dimas Wash (see Figure 1: Topographic Map and Appendix D).

The groundwater contour map published by the Los Angeles County Public Works Dept, indicates that depth to groundwater resources are approximately 195 feet below surface at a sea level elevation of about 300 feet. The groundwater flow direction is southwesterly, mimicking surface drainage (see Figure 3).

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based upon the results of this Phase I Environmental Assessment, PIC offers the following:

1. No documented, significant, historic occurrences of petroleum or hazardous materials contamination were discovered at the subject property.

2. No significant existing or historic onsite sources of petroleum or hazardous materials contamination were discovered.

3. PIC concludes the site lacks significant environmental impairments (Recognized Environmental Conditions).

4. PIC recommends no additional investigation.

E4441 Phase I PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Page 900 of 1264 ends

Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street
Covina, CA 91722
June 15, 2022

Page 10 ends

This report is proprietary and confidential, to be delivered to, and intended for the exclusive use of, the abovenamed client and the client’s assignees only. PIC Environmental Services assumes neither responsibility nor liability for the reliance herein or use hereof by anyone other than the above-named client or the client’s assignees. In addition, the results of the government record search were prepared and provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), who is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided.

Accordingly, we, J. Tim Hersch and Ethan J. Hersch, declare to the best of our knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined by 40 C.F.R. Section 312.10 and we have the specific qualifications based upon education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed all the appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 C.F.R. Section 312.

Should you have any questions or comments regarding the procedures outlined in this report, please do not hesitate to call us at 909/593-2427.

Respectfully submitted,
Ethan J. Hersch
Senior Geologist
J. Tim Hersch j t’A.

California Professional Geologist
President
#4082
c,\ONAFq^
6 a
<o
o o
0 0, CP
-\ TMVI HERSCH
★ #4082 *
B? $
Qf caiw
E4441 Phase I PIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Page 901 of 1264 ends

« 1316
u I —H « *
\fy
t ARRQY/ HWY
iu) . 3P
W tfiROW NWV
TU
n
u* OE NUBIA Sf
*
£ TUDOR ST flOdDAW S'
w o
f imsuhe st^^' V
10 4
1 W COVINA BiVO C ;.‘VW.'. f V i 11 cen t f abookpobt s r C BluisRQQK I 7
fl r Ti __ L
— if
, j____ F BtHTOgp
^ f flrNBOiV ST
|( tcri
* ffffOSJ ...

E btHHOW ST
£T CWfffTSS S / ^cmfrsssr
K/WGS/Cif Off
£ Qj£rW5/C£ Off QGUWS/Of bfl
£FONAn A r
W EDNA Pi 3C
------*----EFUONriT _
—.—j—(—f | 1 rp SAN sW'iamino r0
in i 7 14
w SAW BEUNdSW^ HP
rrrrr
s
:
—M □
15 >- .J cs t icHpQL sr
£ tTAUA ST
S-" H ' Cl
J-
■ W (MO/UO 5 r
□
i GRQVtLiMLR Sf X
. 1
L aADILLQ IT K'F V/.I < r
WCflOVtCEWJrB s? y W CENTffi'iT
a W DU TfH ST : I
I I— < ITL AVf £ PUENTE AVi: £ PUENTE ST
TTl
^3-s
at
a
n1 ( > 39
ilhJj ;3J
£ ffeiVUWCMVf
fAiAffayffy sr
£ IM80AN ST
t '/fflNCiSSr
vv ffowt^jvo'sr
pT
I » i^i
^; £.L J
i
n i j
j, f ~ ~j >E T1S R10W
__.III W WORKMAN AVE
<3 1— I t £ WORKMAN AVI
E IDAUOMF $T
_________E SfUMWOOD SJ
f AMA0W4 ST
* f : -i fc 1
^-astlanp HHOH
■“ic___*—l I
r ewer AYE N yt\ 1
/n L. _
Site Latitude: N34.090899
Site Longitude: W117.907397
Site Elevation: 493 Feet
Source: USGS Topographical Quadrangle
A
North
I
if'™**'*.
"Pin" Environmental
V ILV Services
0 | | 2000
Scale In Feet
Site Location Map
Topographic Map
Client: Drafted By:

Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC EJH
Project Manger:

J. Tim Hersch
Project No:

E4441
Site Location:
578-580 N Azusa Ave./865-867 Glentana St., Covina, CA91722 Date:
5 / 2022
Figure:
1

Page 902 of 1264 ends

mi >i um1 &
im
m I •* I
mmmt
>* ' —' • U ' ■
jf- vi »
-•
&
s
v ••
1 1
•i
m A <
\
v,f*
- ?•/.: r
:V
*5
»• a
•>„ +
OT~' f* n
• ^
~0
o^pipi Environmental
v ** Services
«W*-*
t
0 ___ 30
Scale In Feet
k
North
Site Map
Aerial Photo 2021
Client: Drafted By: Project Manger: Project No:

Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC EJH J Tim Hersch E4441
Site Location: Date: Figure:
578-580 N Azusa Ave./865-867 Glentana St„ Covina, CA91722 5 / 2022 2 Page 903 of 1264 Vt
m ■ r
x n
***5!
H>0 /mj, r.CM
o
if T O o ID 9
3 SANTA Ft c
-) T\T Mr \9 f\J n>
o */>** Jm
*rL kk4
i
/
6 so
X ■s, J*
SITE :

A+»r"*° vr l WI rc
ft If Ova
JMOUi
ovm
KrT) •»
#
\
l
est Covina :T
■ j>.y-
*r<
rr' «»
/V
w
I +* 3*
S?
try rr ■%
*
m '--v^ r
\ 4 /' ••:•• ••••M I
J*-. .*•
1 North
W'RO%,
iPICi♦ *
Environmental
Services
5280
Scale In Feet
Groundwater Contour Map
Client:

Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC
Drafted By:

EJH
Project Manger:

J. Tim Hersch
Project No:

E4441
Site Location:
578-580 N Azusa Ave./865-867 Glentana St., Covina, CA91722 Date:
5/2022
Figure:

Page 904 of 1264 ends

St
UJ
I
o
c
S
n L* ifT
to
>
<
at
o
u
etlStde Pf
u R il
Jubik-rChnotian
iji tool
Basic Well
Symbols
Well Status or
Type Symbol
Active
New
Idle
Plugged
Unknown
Canceled
Oil Gas •
Dry Gas
injector
Cyclic Steam \
Gas Storage 0
Observation @
Wafer Source
Mum (m!
Unknown '?}
E Puente A . -
•■v
te
fe'?
&
<
W Cypress St
Norlhview
v
>
<
jC
u
u
S3
C
to
Z
x
High
3; tool Dot® L®©ni®ini
w
W
San Bernardino Rd
L Radii!to St
UCn 110
High
School
W Bath’lie St
W Puente S'
E Rowland Ave
LLi W Rowland St
7 in
kman Ave
Ra
id ah ome or
San Bernardino Fwy P , ■ , T- 1
- mivr= y i 1 >.ve '
to
>
<
D
fi
<3
z
E Covi
E Cypre
Covin*
•
;
ii
<
to
<
TD
C
r\j
m
E: R.OV
E V
JEEL
*
North
I
n'
rq%,
v >
“PICt a
♦
Environmental
Services
2000
Scale In Feet
Oil Well Map
Client:

Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC
Drafted By:

EJH
Project Manger:

J. Tim Hersch
Project No:

E4441
Site Location
578-580 N Azusa Ave./865-867 Glentana St., Covina, CA 91722 Date:
5 / 2022
Figure:
4

Page 905 of 1264 ends

Asbestos Containing Materials in Buildings
flTpbait Roofing Materiel &~Roofing Felt }
I Flexible Fabric Jointr | Silver Roofing Paint
rrirc^Roor Interiorxl
Spraycd-cn
fire-proofing
Inxulation
Tile or Linoleum
floor Backing
Accurtic
Ceiling
Material
vater
Heater
Rent
Seamr
Taping on
Ductvori:

Seamr
s£3SP Drop
Ceiling
Tiler
Ki Vindov
Putty
.7 77 Taping
Compound!
Textured
Poinlr &
Plarterr
c
Taping
Compoundx
-5
Art) er lor-Cemcnt
V eJlboerd
Pipe
Lagging
9" x 9" Vinyl Arbertor
floor Tile
BlocT Pipe
Inrulation Elbovr
onin' Environmental
a. 1 1 L_l o 0
♦ * Services
Not to Scale Common Asbestos
Containing Materials (ASM's)
Client: Drafted By:

Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC EJH
Project Manger:

J. Tim Hersch
Project No:

E4441
Site Location:
578-580 N Azusa Ave./865-867 Glentana St., Covina, CA91722 Date:
5/2022
Figure:
5

Page 906 of 1264 ends

irindal
irk
(15)
ley
F Newburgh St
n.n Dniton W
t Arrow Hwy Vif1Cent
>1 *lsl> >n*:

High
School >
<
v
<
N
<
i tin z
W Arrow Hwy
■D
>
<
v>3
L Cyprus St
os
>
<
c
o
o
W Cypress St
Nor lh.tr-.v
<15
X
z
L Queetiside Dr
Bernardino Rd
•v
‘A1 5.in ■>.11 rlll'.cr R'-l
..In bibs
Chn :han
j -trio I L Badillo St
iente Ave
lowland A|
Workman Ave E Workman Ave
E Puente Ave
>
<
llI
ci vino
High
W Badillo St
W Puente St
E Rowland A•.< W Rowland St
1 >uina
I . i
o
z
E Covina
E Cypress
F 7
Covina
V
m > 1 <
2 c
P (N
Q
•y>
c/>
E Rowi;
E iv| u 0<: Lanc* Mana9
ernent, Esri, HERE,, Gafrflfr
^ Manning Brothers Class III Landfill (Active)
North
I
oViir-^ Environmental iP «
♦ ♦ Services
w
0 2000
Scale In Feet
Landfill Map
Client: Drafted By:

Sherman Oaks Inn, LLC EJH
Project Manger:

J. Tim Hersch
Project No:

E4441
Site Location:
578-580 N Azusa Ave./865-867 Glentana St., Covina, CA91722 Date:
5 / 2022
Figure:
6

Page 907 of 1264 ends

APPENDIX A:

TITLE INFORMATION

Page 908 of 1264 ends

NETR£2Mme
m PROPERTY DETAIL REPORT created 2022-05-31 Prepared exclusively for Ethan Hersch

TARGET PROPERTY
,CAOwner Information
Owner Name: SHERMAN OAKS INN LLC
Mailing Address: 1011 S ATLANTIC DR COMPTON CA 90221 -4758 C012 Phone Number: Vesting Codes:

Owner Occupied Indicator: UNKNOWN Pending Record indicator:

Corporate Owner:

Location Information
Legal Description: TRACT # 23074 LOTS 5,6 AND 7 AND W 10 FT OF LOT 8 County: LOS ANGELES APN: 8432-006-015 £r~
Census Tract / Block: 4060.00 Alternate APN:

Township-Range-Sect: Subdivision: 23074
Legal Book - Page: 629-63 Map Reference: 88-D4 /
Legal Lot: 8 Tract #: 23074
Legal Block: School District: COVINA VLY
Market Area: 614 Munic / Township:

Neighbor Code:

Owner Transfer Information
Recording / Sale Date: Sale Price:

Document #: Deed Type:

Instrument #: 1st Mtg Document #:

Book - Page:

Last Market Sale Information
Recording / Sale Date: 09/06/2013/07/24/2013 1st Mtg Amount / Type: / Sale Price: $960,000.00 1 st Mtg Int. Rate / Type: /
Sale Type: FULL 1st Mtg Term:

Document #: 1305190 1st Mtg Document#:

Instrument #: 000001305190 1st Mtg Instrument #:

Book - Page: 1st Mtg Book - Page:

Deed Type: GRANT DEED 2nd Mtg Amount / Type: /
Transfer Document #: 2nd Mtg Int. Rate / Type: /
New Construction: 2nd Mtg Term:

Multi/Split Sale: MULTI Price per SqFt:

Cash Down Payment: Stamps Amount: $1,056.00
Title Company: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE CO
Lender:

Seller Name: MAYERFELD MARTIN & ELAYNE
Prior Sale Information
Prior Rec / Sale Date: 03/21/1969/ Prior Deed Type: DEED (REG) Prior Sale Price: $15,000.00 Prior Lender:

Prior Sale Type: FULL Prior IstMtg Amount/Type: /
Prior Doc #: Prior IstMtg Int. Rate/Type: /
Prior Instrument #: Prior Stamps Amount: $16.50
Prior Book - Page:

Site Information
Land Use:

Flood Zone:

Flood Zone Map:

Flood Panel Date:

Res / Comm Units:
# of Buildings:

COMMERCIAL
LOT Acres: .2959
Lot Area: —^ 12888
Lot Width / Depth: /
Usable Lot: 7815
Lot Shape:

Bldg Width / Depth: /
County Use:

State Use:

Site Influence:

Sewer Type:

Topography:

Water Type:

COMMERCIAL

ROLLING/HILLY
UPPER SAN Page 909 of 1264
Zoning: CVC3AY Building Class: Water District: GABRIEL VA Tax Information
Total Value: $176,667.00 Assessed Year: 2021 Property Tax: $2,330.63 Land Value: $176,667.00 Improve %: Tax Area: 3045
Improvement Value: Dist: Tax Year: 2021
Total Taxable Value: $176,667.00 Fire Dist: CONSOLIDATED TaxExemptjon Market Value: Garbage Dist: Equal Rate:

Delinquent Date: 2019 Equal Year:

Property Characteristics
Gross Area: Parking Type: Construction:

Living Area: Garage Area: Heat Type:

Tot Adj Area: Garage 2 Area: Heat Fuel:

Above Grade: Garage Capacity: Parcel Fuel:

Ground Floor Area: Parking Spaces: Exterior Wall:

Base / Main Area: / Carport: Interior Wall:

Upper Area: Basement Area: Foundation:
2nd Floor Area; Finish Bsmnt Area: Air Cond:
3rd Floor Area: Basement Type: Roof Type:

Rentable Area: Attic Type: Roof Shape:

Additional Area: Porch Type: Roof Frame:

Total Rooms: Porch 1 Area: Roof Material:

Bedrooms: Porch 2 Area: Floor Type:

Bath (F/H): / Patio Type: Floor Cover:

Total Baths / Fixtures: / Patio 1 Area: Style:

Year Built / Eff: / Pool: Quality:

Fireplace: Pool Area: Condition:

Fireplace Description: # of Stories:

Basement Description:

Other Improvements:

Bldg Comments:

Parcel Comments:

Other Rooms:

Extra Features
Description: Unit: Size / Qty: Width: Depth: Year Built: mprovement Value:

NETRonline and its data supplier(s) do not guarantee nor include any warranty of any kind whether expressed or implied, about the validity of all information in this report since this information
is retrieved as it is recorded from the various agencies that make it available.

Page 910 of 1264 ends

NETR^riilirifc
\ PROPERTY DETAIL REPORT created 2022-05-31 Prepared exclusively for Ethan Hersch

TARGET PROPERTY
578 N AZUSA AVE COVINA, CA 91722-3546 C001
Owner Information
Owner Name: SHERMAN OAKS INN LLC
Mailing Address: 1011 S ATLANTIC DR COMPTON CA 90221 -4758 C012 Phone Number: Vesting Codes:

Owner Occupied Indicator:

Corporate Owner;
N Pending Record Indicator:

Location Information
Legal Description: TRACT NO 23074 LOTS 1,2,3 AND LOT 4
County: LOS ANGELES APN: 8432-006-017 4—
Census Tract / Block: 4060.00 Alternate APN:

Township-Range-Sect: Subdivision: 23074
Legal Book - Page: 629-63 Map Reference: 88-D4 /
Legal Lot: 4 Tract#: 23074
Legal Block: School District: COVINA VLY
Market Area:

Neighbor Code:
614 Munic / Township:

Owner Transfer Information
Recording / Sale Date: Sale Price:

Document #; Deed Type:

Instrument #:

Book - Page:
1st Mtg Document #:

Last Market Sale Information
Recording / Sale Date: 09/06/2013/07/24/2013 1st Mtg Amount / Type: 7 Sale Price: $960,000.00 1st Mtg Int. Rate / Type: /
Sale Type: FULL 1st Mtg Term:

Document #: 1305190 1st Mtg Document#:

Instrument #: 000001305190 1st Mtg Instrument #:

Book - Page: 1st Mtg Book - Page:

Deed Type: GRANT DEED 2nd Mtg Amount / Type: /
Transfer Document #: 2nd Mtg Int. Rate / Type: 1
New Construction: 2nd Mtg Term:

Multi / Split Sale: MULTIPLE Price per SqFt: $154.32
(Cash Down Payment: Stamps Amount: $1,056.00
Title Company: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE CO
Lender:

Seller Name; MAYERFELD MARTIN & ELAYNE
Prior Sale information
Prior Rec / Sale Date: 03/20/1967/ Prior Deed Type: DEED(REG) Prior Sale Price: $44,000.00 Prior Lender:

Prior Sale Type: FULL Prior IstMtg Amount/Type: /
Prior Doc #: Prior IstMtg Int. Rate/Type: /
Prior Instrument #:

Prior Book - Page:

Prior Stamps Amount: $48.40
Site Information
Land Use: OFFICE Acres:

BUILDING ,5147 County Use: OFFICE BLDG
Flood Zone: Lot Area: ^ 22422 State Use:

IjFlood Zone Map: Lot Width / Depth: / Site influence:
(Flood Panel Date: Usable Lot: 22403 Sewer Type:
:Res / Comm Units: Lot Shape: Topography: ROLLING/HILLY # of Buildings: 1 Bldg Width / Depth: / Water Type:
! ?
UPPER SAN Page 911 of 1264
Zoning: CVC3AY Building Class: Water District: GABRIEL VA j Tax Information
Total Value: $910,531.00 Assessed Year: 2021 Property Tax: $13,600.53 Land Value: $508,494.00 Improve %: Tax Area: 3045
Improvement Value: $402,037.00 Dist: Tax Year: 2021
Total Taxable Value: $910,531.00 Fire Dist: CONSOLIDATED TaxExemption; Market Value: Garbage Dist: Equal Rate:

Delinquent Date: 2019 Equal Year:

Property Characteristics
Gross Area: 6221 Parking Type: Construction:

Living Area: 6221 Garage Area: Heat Type:

Tot Adj Area: Garage 2 Area: Heat Fuel:

Above Grade: Garage Capacity: Parcel Fuel:

Ground Floor Area: Parking Spaces: Exterior Wall:

Base / Main Area: / Carport: Interior Wall:

Upper Area: Basement Area: Foundation:
2nd Floor Area: Finish Bsmnt Area: Air Cond:
3rd Floor Area: Basement Type: Roof Type:

Rentable Area: Attic Type: Roof Shape:

Additional Area: Porch Type: Roof Frame:

Total Rooms: Porch 1 Area: Roof Material:

Bedrooms: Porch 2 Area: Floor Type:

Bath (F/H): / Patio Type: Floor Cover:

Total Baths / Fixtures: / Patio 1 Area: Style:

Year Built / Eff: 1963/ Pool: Quality:

Fireplace: /f\ Pool Area: Condition:

Fireplace Description: T
# of Stories:

Basement Description:

Other Improvements:

Bldg Comments:

Parcel Comments:

Other Rooms:

Extra Features
Description: Unit: Size/Qty: Width: Depth: Year Built: Improvement Value:

Page 912 of 1264 ends

Covina City CouncilAugust 20, 2024

Covina City Council
August 20, 2024