1 | P a g e
4/18/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
Mayor Jason Greenough Mayor Pro Tem Isaiah Wright
Council Member Raymond Altman Council Member Beau Smith Council Member Blake Inscore
AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FLYNN CENTER BOARD CHAMBERS
981 H STREET
CRESCENT CITY, CA 95531
www.crescentcity.org
agenda packet may be reviewed at City Hall, 377 J Street, Crescent City, CA or on our website:
35.104 ADA Title II]. For TTYDD use for speech and hearing impaired, please dial 711. A full the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102- City Clerk’s office at (707)464-7483, ext. 223. Notification 48 hours before the meeting will enable Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in the meeting, please contact the Notice regarding Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the Americans with agenda. Written public comments will not be read aloud during the meeting. received will be forwarded to the City Council and posted on the website next to the agenda item to which your comment pertains in the subject line. Public comments so City Clerk prior to 12:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. Please identify the meeting date and City, California, 95531. All public comments (via email or mail) must be received by the [email protected] or by filing it with the City Clerk at 377 J Street, Crescent 4) Public comments may be made in advance by submitting written comment via public comment may be made by calling in to the meeting using the Zoom phone number; 3) Watch the meeting via livestream on YouTube (channel: City of Crescent City, California), raise hand feature on Zoom;
Crescent City website (www.crescentcity.org), public comment may be made by using the posted on both the City of Crescent City – City Hall Facebook page and the City of 2) Participate live online via Zoom (details below) or by utilizing the link to join the meeting MONDAY APRIL 18, 2022 6:00 P.M.
1) Attend the meeting in person, public comment at the podium will be allowed. methods:
The public may access and participate in the public meeting using one or more of the following OPEN SESSION AT 6PM
*NOTE THE CLOSED SESSION BEGINS AT 5PM
MUTE / UNMUTE PRESS *6 RAISE HAND PRESS *9
ZOOM WEBINAR ID: 830 2572 8182
ZOOM PHONE NUMBER: (253) 215-8782
2 | P a g e
4/18/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
CLOSED SESSION
Call to order
Roll call
ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
• Conference with Legal Counsel: Existing Litigation (Govt. Code § 54956.9(d)) (1 case) Bertsch-Ocean View CSD v. City of Crescent City, Del Norte Superior Court Case No. CVUJ2020-1287 • Conference with Legal Counsel: Potential Litigation (Govt. Code § 54956.9(d)(4)): 1 case
OPEN SESSION
Call to order
Roll call
Pledge of Allegiance
REPORT OUT ON CLOSED SESSION
CEREMONIAL ITEMS
1. Police Chief Commendation for Sergeant Jennifer Owen and Police Officer Tyler Balch
2. National Foster Care Day Proclamation
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
Any member of the audience is invited to address the City Council on any matter that is within the jurisdiction of the City of Crescent City. Comments of public interest or on matters appearing on the agenda are accepted. Note, however, that the Council is not able to undertake extended discussion or act on non-agendized items. Such items can be referred to staff for appropriate action, which may include placement on a future agenda. All comments shall be directed toward the entire Council. Any comments that are not at the microphone are out of order and will not be a part of the public record. After receiving recognition from the Mayor, please state your name and city or county residency for the record. Public comment is limited to three (3) minutes. The public is additionally allotted three minutes each in which to speak on any item on the agenda prior to any action taken by the Council.
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Council Meeting Minutes
• Recommendation: Approve the March 21, 2022 regular meeting minutes of the City Council.
4. Warrant Claims List
• Recommendation: Receive and file the warrant claims list for the period March 26, 2022, through April 8, 2022.
5. Payroll Report
• Recommendation: Receive and file the biweekly payroll report for the period ending April 9, 2022, paid April 15, 2022.
3 | P a g e
4/18/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
6. City of Crescent City Planning Commission Appointment • Appoint Mohammed Amer to the City of Crescent City Planning Commission to fill the vacant position with his term ending in May of 2025
7. Director of Economic Development & Recreation Employment Agreement • Recommendation: Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-26, A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY APPOINTING ASHLEY
TAYLOR DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION AND
APPROVING AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
8. Generator Purchase and Installation at Waster System Pressure Regulating Facility • Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to sign the Small Public Works Agreement with Northridge Electric for the installation of a 30KW generator at the Wonderstump Pressure Regulating Facility (PRF) and direct staff to reallocate funding from the Chlorination Facility Generator Replacement project to the PRF generator installation project
PUBLIC HEARING
9. Update to Crescent City’s Industrial Pretreatment Program – Local Limits • Recommendation: Open public hearing
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Close public hearing
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-27, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY MODIFYING THE LOCAL LIMITS
FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGES, AUTHORIZING THE ENFORCEMENT
OF SUCH LIMITS, AND THE INCLUSION OF LOCAL LIMITS IN WASTEWATER
DISCHARGE PERMITS
REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS - None
NEW BUSINESS
10. Contract Amendment with Jacobs and Application for Additional Grant Funding • Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute contract amendment #4 with Jacobs Engineering for Phase 1 of the RBC/Digester upgrade design • Authorize staff to make an application for additional Clean Water State Revolving Funds to accommodate future phases of the design
11. E-Scooters: Operations and License Agreement with Bird Rides, Inc. • Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign a Shared Mobility Device Operations and License Agreement with Bird Rides, Inc.
4 | P a g e
4/18/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
12. Introduction of Military Equipment Use Policy
• Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Waive full reading, read by title only and introduce Ordinance No. 830, AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY APPROVING A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY AS REQUIRED BY AB 481 Vision:
The City of Crescent City will continue to stand the test of time and promote quality of life and community pride for our residents, businesses and visitors through leadership, diversity, and teamwork.
Mission:
The purpose of our city is to promote a high quality of life, leadership and services to the residents, businesses, and visitors we serve. The City is dedicated to providing the most efficient, innovative and economically sound municipal services building on our diverse history, culture and unique natural resources.
Values:
Accountability
Honesty & Integrity
Excellent Customer Service
Effective & Active Communication
Teamwork
Fiscally Responsible
City Clerk/Administrative Analyst
/s/ Robin Patch
April 15, 2022
POSTED:
Monday, May 2, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. in the Flynn Center, 981 H Street, Crescent City, CA 95531.
Adjourn to the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Crescent City scheduled for
ADJOURNMENT
staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. reports on their own activities. They may ask questions for clarification, make a referral to Gov’t Code § 54954.2(a), City Council Members may make brief announcements or brief ➢ Reports, Concerns, Referrals, Council travel and training reports – In accordance with by any member present shall be considered an order of the City Council.) of the City Manager. (Directives from individual Council Members that are not objected to to the administrative services of the City and provide direction with respect to subordinates Code § 2.08.200, the City Council may instruct the city manager on matters of importance ➢ City Manager Report and City Council Directives – Pursuant to Crescent City Municipal respect to such matters.
Crescent City. Authorize the Mayor to sign the appropriate letters and/or positions with ➢ Legislative Matters – Consider miscellaneous legislative matters pertinent to the City of
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
Police Chief Commendations
for
Sergeant Jennifer Owen
and
Police Officer Tyler Balch
_________________________________
Mayor Jason Greenough
support.
encourages the residents of Crescent City to wear blue on May 10, 2022 in a show of BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Crescent City
NATIONAL FOSTER CARE DAY
May, 2022 as
NOW, THEREFORE, the Crescent City Council hereby proclaims the second Tuesday in on these children and points us all in the direction of solutions; and the support of our communities across the country. National Foster Care Day shines a light WHEREAS, foster children have an uphill battle with startling statistics to overcome and need and foster parents is high; and
new child placed into care every 2 minutes, the need for support services, essential items, WHEREAS, with over 400,000 children in the foster care system at any given time, and a of foster parents and stipends that don’t cover the essentials of a growing child; and abuse, poverty, neglect, or even the death of their loved ones. There is a nationwide shortage WHEREAS, many enter care with little to no belongings and have suffered the effects of help repair a system that is plagued with shortages nationwide; and WHEREAS, kicking off Foster Care Month, National Foster Care Day provides a platform to show their support for foster youth everywhere; and
Day on the first Tuesday in May encourages everyone to wear blue and raise their voices to WHEREAS, dedicated to all the children in the U.S. foster care system, National Foster Care City of Crescent City
of the
Proclamation
1 | P a g e
3/21/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
Mayor Jason Greenough Mayor Pro Tem Isaiah Wright
Council Member Raymond Altman Council Member Beau Smith Council Member Blake Inscore
MONDAY MARCH 21, 2022 6:00 P.M.
OPEN SESSION
Call to order Mayor Pro Tem Wright called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Roll call Council Members present: Council Member Ray Altman, Council Member Blake Inscore, Council Member Beau Smith and Mayor Pro Tem Isaiah Wright
Council Member absent: Mayor Jason Greenough
Staff present: City Manager Eric Wier, City Attorney Martha Rice, City Clerk/Administrative Analyst Robin Patch, Human Resources Manager Sunny Valero, Finance Director Linda Leaver, Public Works Director Jon Olson, Public Works Maintenance Manager Jason Wylie, Housing Authority Executive Director Megan Miller, Fire Chief Bill Gillespie and Police Chief Richard Griffin Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Pro Tem Wright
*Moment of silence for the loved ones we have lost to COVID-19* Mayor Pro Tem Wright called for a moment of silence.
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
The following citizens addressed the Council:
Roger Gitlin: spoke on 200 A Street and would like an update on the code enforcement case at the next Council meeting. Also requested the City send postcards or a reminder system to have owners take care of the weeds growing in the curbs, gutters and sidewalks.
Steve Fournier: spoke in regards to not living in his home for a year and came back to town with a $900 water/sewer bill and there was no usage on the meter.
CEREMONIAL ITEMS
1. Child Abuse Prevention Month Proclamation
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FLYNN CENTER BOARD CHAMBERS
981 H STREET
CRESCENT CITY, CA 95531
2 | P a g e
3/21/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
Mayor Pro Tem Wright read the proclamation aloud and presented it to Susan Smith of the Child Abuse Prevention Council.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2. Council Meeting Minutes
• Recommendation: Approve the March 7, 2022 regular meeting minutes of the City Council.
3. Warrant Claims List
• Recommendation: Receive and file the warrant claims list for the period January 29, 2022, through February 11, 2022 and for the period February 12, 2022, through February 25, 2022.
4. Payroll Report
• Recommendation: Receive and file the biweekly payroll report for the period ending March 12, 2022, paid March 18, 2022.
5. Budget-to-Actual Financial Reports for February 2022 • Recommendation: Receive and file monthly budget-to-actual financial reports of the City’s major operating funds for month of February 2022
6. Wastewater Treatment Plant Digester Cleaning
• Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign a Small Public Works Agreement between the City of Crescent City and Wastewater Solids Management, Inc. for the purpose of solids removal and cleaning of two anaerobic digesters at the City of Crescent City Wastewater Treatment Plant • Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-21, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
7. Del Norte Solid Waste Management Authority Revised Trespass Ordinance Approval • Recommendation: Approve the revised Del Norte Solid Waste Management Authority Ordinance No. 2022-01 as presented
8. Water Capacity Study for Elk Valley Rancheria Under Water Wheeling Agreement • Recommendation: Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-22, A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
• Ratify the City Manager’s signature of the Amendment to Task Order 20 with Stover Engineering for BOVCSD Water System Capacity Analysis
9. State Water Board Arrearages Payment Program – Wastewater Funding • Recommendation: Authorize the submittal of an application for funding under the State Water Board Arrearages Payment Program for Wastewater and authorize the resumption of water disconnections for delinquent water and water/sewer accounts as presented
Council Member Smith asked for item 6 to be pulled from the consent calendar for questions; there were no dissenting Council Members.
There were no public comments on the consent calendar.
3 | P a g e
3/21/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
On a motion by Council Member Inscore, seconded by Council Member Altman, and carried on a 4-0 polled vote with Mayor Greenough being absent, the City Council of the City of Crescent City adopted the consent calendar consisting of items 2-5, 7-9 as presented.
Council Member Smith asked about the WWTP Digester Cleaning and wasn’t the company already under contract for it; City Manager Wier stated that this particular item is not part of their standard contract.
On a motion by Council Member Smith, seconded by Council Member Inscore and carried on a 4-0 polled vote with Mayor Greenough being absent, the City Council of the City of Crescent City approved and authorized the City Manager to sign a Small Public Works Agreement between the City of Crescent City and Wastewater Solids Management, Inc. for the purpose of solids removal and cleaning of two anaerobic digesters at the City of Crescent City Wastewater Treatment Plant and approved and adopted Resolution No. 2022-21, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET OF THE
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
PUBLIC HEARING
10. Adoption of Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance
• Recommendation: Open the public hearing
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comments
• Further Council discussion
• Close the public hearing
• Waive full reading, read by title only and adopt Ordinance No. 828, AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AMENDING THE CRESCENT CITY MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 8.32, ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION, TO TITLE 8, HEALTH AND SAFETY
Mayor Pro Tem Wright opened the public hearing at 6:15 p.m.
City Attorney Rice reported to the Council that there were no changes from the last meeting, the ordinance will be in effect in 30 days from adoption.
Mayor Pro Tem Wright closed the public hearing at 6:17 p.m.
There were no public comments.
On a motion by Council Member Inscore, seconded by Council Member Altman, and carried on a 4-0 polled vote with Mayor Greenough being absent, the City Council of the City of Crescent City waived full reading, read by title only and adopted Ordinance No. 828, AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AMENDING THE CRESCENT CITY MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 8.32, ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION, TO TITLE 8, HEALTH
AND SAFETY
ADJOURN TO THE CRESCENT CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY
(Minutes in the next agenda for the Housing Authority)
RECONVENE THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Pro Tem Wright reconvened the City Council meeting at 6:47 p.m. 4 | P a g e
3/21/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS - None
NEW BUSINESS
13. MOU with Del Norte County and Del Norte Solid Waste Management Authority Regarding SB 1383 Implementation
• Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve a Memorandum of Understanding Between the Jurisdictions of Del Norte County, City of Crescent City, and the Del Norte Solid Waste Management Authority Regarding Implementation of SB 1383 Regulations for Rural Jurisdictions and Defined in Section 4269.8 of the Public Resources Code
City Attorney Rice stated that this agreement goes hand in hand with the one adopted earlier in the meeting. The Authority will do the majority of the implementation of the plan. Council Member Smith asked if this will make us complaint sooner than later; City Attorney Rice stated that yes and that mandatory organics collection has been postponed until 2027.
There were no public comments.
On a motion by Council Member Inscore, seconded by Council Member Altman, and carried on a 4-0 polled vote with Mayor Greenough being absent, the City Council of the City of Crescent City approved a Memorandum of Understanding Between the Jurisdictions of Del Norte County, City of Crescent City, and the Del Norte Solid Waste Management Authority Regarding Implementation of SB 1383 Regulations for Rural Jurisdictions and Defined in Section 4269.8 of the Public Resources Code
14. MOU for Axon Video Software Licenses for Del Norte County District Attorney’s Office • Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with Del Norte County for Axon Video Software Licenses for Del Norte County District Attorney’s Office • Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-20, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
Police Chief Griffin stated that the goal of this is transparency for the public. Currently when body camera footage is uploaded, it is uploaded with a case number and category in www.evidence.com. Presently the Records Clerk would get a request from the DA’s office for the case file body camera footage. This MOU will give 13 licenses to the DA’s office which gives 13 users access for the DA’s office. The DA’s office can log in to evidence.com to view the video footage as long as they are not marked confidential. They cannot make changes to the case numbers or the retention – it only gives them access to view the footage. If footage is marked confidential, and the DA wants to view the footage, there would be a meeting to discuss it further.
Council Member Smith asked if the Chief of Police would be the lead administrator for this program; Chief Griffin stated that he was. Mayor Pro Tem Wright asked how City’s usually send footage to the DA’s office; Chief Griffin stated that other cities don’t have the same working relationship with the DA’s office as CCPD has with the DNCo DA therefore implementing this instead of the typical way shows that.
5 | P a g e
3/21/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
There were no public comments.
On a motion by Council Member Smith, seconded by Council Member Altman, and carried on a 4-0 polled vote with Mayor Greenough being absent, the City Council of the City of Crescent City approved a Memorandum of Understanding with Del Norte County for Axon Video Software Licenses for Del Norte County District Attorney’s Office and approved and adopted Resolution No. 2022-20, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
15. Gas Taxes and Gas Prices
• Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Take such action and/or direct staff as necessary and appropriate, possibly including writing letters to state and federal lawmakers requesting relief for taxpayers in light of soaring gas prices
City Attorney Rice stated that the Council was in consensus to have this discussion on the agenda. She went over the breakdown of the taxes on gas stating that gas prices are largely dependent upon crude oil prices, which are determined in the global crude oil market by the worldwide demand for and supply of crude oil. Other components of the retail price of gas are refining costs and profits, distribution and marketing costs and profits, and taxes. She further stated that the oil companies can still charge $6 a gallon if they choose to, so anything that is done may not make it to the taxpayer’s pocket. City Attorney Rice stated that the Council can write letters of support for pending state and/or federal legislation; write letters to state and federal representatives imploring them to take action to provide relief to consumers and send letters to state and/or federal representatives requesting specific action. Council Member Smith stated that people will eventually not be able to drive to work and it will be a trickle effect. Asked for how much Measure S has received from the gas tax; wants to see something that we can do locally to help the situation. Council Member Inscore stated that it is his opinion based on what happened back in 2008 that the gas prices are eventually going to come back down. City Attorney Rice stated that any change to the ordinance will have to go back the voters. Council Member Inscore stated that an average voter would have a difficult time understanding what the City would want to do by taking a portion of Measure S. We have already made significant commitments with the Measure S funds. It’s the State legislators that can make changes much bigger than what we can do here locally. Mayor Pro Tem Wright asked if we did send it back to the voters, how many gas stations are in the City limits; City Manager Wier stated that most all of the gas stations are in the City limits; only two are in the County. Mayor Pro Tem Wright asked if it were to be placed before the voters when would it be; City Attorney Rice stated it would not go until November. Council Member Inscore stated that we couldn’t help anyone here until Spring next year where the State could help people in two months. Council Member Smith stated that since he has been on the Council he has seen that Measure S funds has been utilized properly. Council Member Altman stated that the federal government has not raised the gas tax in 20 years. If it was removed, the infrastructure would not be able to happen. There will be very little money in the pockets of drivers and will cost a lot of money in lost funds to infrastructure. City Attorney Rice answered that money that was proposed from Governor Newsom’s office would go to just drivers, other legislators have stated that it would be all taxpayers and their dependents. Council Member Altman said that it would take a long time to even to get on the floor for voting. Council Member Inscore stated that he was not advocating for a repeal, you could keep the gas tax where it is since they are expecting a $6billion surplus; backfill the tax with the surplus so the market could correct. Council Member Smith stated he would like to see how much of the gas tax goes to Measure S Funds, most people are going to Brookings for gas. Council Member Altman stated it is proposed for July – December so its unknown how long these cents off per gallon would last. 6 | P a g e
3/21/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
The following citizen addressed the Council:
Dave Schmidt: agrees to low taxes across the board as well as other products and services.
Council Member Altman stated that he was understanding that this was for letters of support for state and federal legislators and that the discussion is about local taxes. Wanted to clarify what the goal of this agenda item; is not in support of what was suggested since it would affect infrastructure funding, which is deeply needed. Council Member Inscore stated that a letter sent representing Crescent City that speaks to supporting the people and that if we can’t come to consensus for the full Council to send a letter, an individual Council Member can send a letter, which he intends to do. Council Member Altman stated that he agrees with his fellow Council Members, however the real problem is a supply problem and that it will work its way out in time.
Mayor Pro Tem Wright asked if there was consensus to have staff draft a letter. Council Member Inscore suggested City Manager Wier should reach out to Sara Sanders, the League of California Cities Representative to have a letter prepared for Council review and approval; City Manager Wier stated he would reach out to the League to see if there are other cities that are contemplating the same thing. Council Member Inscore stated his agreement with Council Member Altman in the fact that many communities have already made commitments based on these funds and backfilling with the surplus.
16. Selection of Council Member for the Fire Chief Interview Panel • Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Select a Council Member to be a panelist for the Fire Chief Interview City Manager Wier stated that moving forward with the Fire Chief recruitment, there is the need to have this interview panel as we are now down to the top candidates. Typically, the Council is not involved in these Director positions/interviews. However, in this particular role, there will be the need to have one Council Member to represent the City Council in the panel. March 31st in the morning. Council Member Inscore stated his interest in the position.
Council Member Altman nominated Council Member Smith since he has experience in the fire department; Council Member Smith declined.
There were no public comments.
On a motion by Council Member Altman, seconded by Council Member Smith and carried unanimously, Council Member Inscore was selected to be a panelist for the Fire Chief interview
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
➢ Legislative Matters – Primarily revolving around the gas discussion and letters being discussed to come back before the Council.
➢ City Manager Report and City Council Directives – City Manager Wier reported on the following: (listen to report)
o Measure S meeting last Tuesday in which Front Street was discussed. Direction was given to use unallocated Measure S funds and ARPA Funds to do two more blocks; construction to begin in July
o Pool project and upgrade to HVAC; agreement with Johnson Controls will come before the Council
7 | P a g e
3/21/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
o Clear direction was received for the new City Hall and CCPD facility upgrades; consultant agreements will come before the Council as well o RAISE grant application is being worked on by staff – fourth time applying for Front Street – very competitive grant, but the City is in a good position for funding. o Rural Recreation grant– for the amphitheater and waterfront plaza applied for o Coastal Voices grant ($200k – news on April 1st)
o CalOES grant for generators will be before the Council at the next meeting o Recruitment and hires is a priority; RV Park Supervisor and Finance Analyst 1 have been hired and have begun their work with the City.
o Pool closure set for next week for one week; routine maintenance, cleaning and working on the decks.
➢ Reports, Concerns, Referrals, Council travel and training reports – Council Member Altman: said he was concerned about the public comment about the $900 water bill and asked for the policy to be reviewed.
Council Member Smith: asked for a list for the Boards/Committees Council Member Inscore: for consideration of the next agenda – Tolowa Dee-ni Nation will be seeking funding of $2.5 million for wastewater structure improvements at the Xaa-wan’-k’wvt Village and Resort and asked for a letter of support. Council was in consensus. Stated that in regards to the RAISE grant, if work is continually being done on Front Street, our project will be too small to have for the grant application for the funding. City Manager Wier stated a cost benefit analysis was done and our project was recognized as highly recommended for funding.
Council Member Altman asked for the numbers for the RAISE grant seeing how Tamera Leighton stated we didn’t have any fatalities on Front Street to receive funding. City Manager Wier stated that due to the 80’ crossing it is a strong safety component for the grant.
Mayor Pro Tem Wright: asked about the man who had the large water bill and would we even be able to suspend someone’s account at this time; City Attorney Rice stated she is unaware of a policy. Attended the GSRMA Board meeting as well as the Chamber Annual Awards Dinner.
Council Member Inscore stated that since there is a fee for the sewer that the best idea would be for the owner to suspend the account if they were going to be gone.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Pro Tem Wright adjourned the meeting at 7:58 p.m. to the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Crescent City scheduled for Monday, April 4, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. in the Flynn Center, 981 H Street, Crescent City, CA 95531.
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Robin Patch
City Clerk/Administrative Analyst
Accounts Payable
User:
Printed:
crawlings
4/13/2022 12:09 PM
Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH EDDTAX State of California EDD TAX Auto Pay 04/04/2022 0.00 6,617.59 ACH FITTAX FIT Payroll Taxes Auto Pay 04/04/2022 0.00 25,793.66 ACH PERS2 Public Emp Retirement Sys 04/04/2022 0.00 25,933.70 440373 CASTATE CA State Disbursement Unit 04/04/2022 0.00 158.76 440374 WAMUTU Crescent City Employees Association 04/04/2022 0.00 65.00 440375 CCPOLI Crescent City Police Officer's Association 04/04/2022 0.00 500.00 440376 ICMARE Icma Retirement Trust-457 04/04/2022 0.00 6,430.96 440377 UB*05489 TIMOTHY ANDRESEN 04/07/2022 0.00 207.18 440378 BERTSC Bertsch-Oceanview Csd 04/07/2022 0.00 8,950.62 440379 UB*05488 THERESE BETTENCOURT 04/07/2022 0.00 80.00 440380 BLUEST Blue Star Gas Associates 04/07/2022 0.00 9,912.56 440381 BOOKCTR BookingCenter.com LLC 04/07/2022 0.00 150.00 440382 BORGESJA Jason Borges 04/07/2022 0.00 99.75
440383 CURRYE Brad Coleman Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 22.22
440384 CRENNE C Renner Petroleum Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 1,532.49 440385 ZCADEPIN CA Dept of Industrial Relations 04/07/2022 0.00 225.00 440386 ZCABUILD California Building Standards Commission 04/07/2022 0.00 46.80 440387 CAMPTO Campton Electric Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 407.96 440388 CARAHSOF Carahsoft Technology Corporation 04/07/2022 0.00 10.00 440389 CHARTEC Charter Communications 04/07/2022 0.00 1,232.95 440390 CHURCH Churchtree Csd 04/07/2022 0.00 509.65
440391 CLAGWOLF Claggett Wolfe Associates Inc. 04/07/2022 0.00 23,231.00 440392 CLEARS Rocklin Police Dept CLEARS Superior Chapter 04/07/2022 0.00 50.00 440393 DAILYT Country Media Inc. 04/07/2022 0.00 1,384.32 440394 DNCOFL D N Co Flood Control Dist 04/07/2022 0.00 708.02 440395 DNCBOS Del Norte County 04/07/2022 0.00 145.00
440396 DNCO Del Norte County 04/07/2022 0.00 38,725.02
440397 ZCACONS Dept Of Conservation 04/07/2022 0.00 116.41 440398 VERIZO2 Frontier California Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 1,489.67 440399 NAPA GDMI ENT INC 04/07/2022 0.00 1,233.04
440400 UB*05492 NICHOLAS GEZON 04/07/2022 0.00 250.00
440401 GRAING Grainger 04/07/2022 0.00 604.11
440402 HDFOWLER H. D. Fowler Company, Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 31.46 440403 HEMMIN Hemmingsen Contracting Co Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 770.00 440404 IDEXX IDEXX Distribution Inc. 04/07/2022 0.00 1,171.32 440405 INDEPE Independent Business Forms, Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 330.05 440406 INDUSTST Industrial Steel & Supply Co., Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 1,054.60 440407 LEXISNEX LexisNexis Risk Data Management Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 150.00 440408 LNLINDUS LNL Industries 04/07/2022 0.00 24,264.30 440409 UB*05486 THERESA MC DANIEL 04/07/2022 0.00 152.89 440410 UB*05487 ANN MELENDREZ 04/07/2022 0.00 186.87
440411 MISSIO Mission Linen Supply 04/07/2022 0.00 187.14 440412 UB*05491 ALEXANDRA MOE 04/07/2022 0.00 250.00
440413 MORJON Mor-Jon Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 5.43
440414 NCAGLOV NCG Safety Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 249.97
440415 OFFICEDE Office Depot 04/07/2022 0.00 59.27
440416 OLSONJ Jonathan Olson 04/07/2022 0.00 2,121.64
AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (4/13/2022 12:09 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount 440417 FRANKO Orca Heating & Refrigeration Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 496.00 440418 OREILLY O'Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC 04/07/2022 0.00 334.83 440419 OTIS E Otis Elevator Company Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 323.09 440420 OWENEQ Owen Equipment Sales 04/07/2022 0.00 606.66 440421 PACPWRLO Pacific Power 04/07/2022 0.00 31,692.31 440422 PARKWA Parkway Feed Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 92.23
440423 HITECHSE Pinger Industries, Inc. 04/07/2022 0.00 263.97 440424 CCGLAS Alan Porteous 04/07/2022 0.00 423.17
440425 REDSKY Red Sky Inc. 04/07/2022 0.00 13,424.00
440426 ROOK Ray Rook 04/07/2022 0.00 2,124.64
440427 ROSSJAN Matthew Ross 04/07/2022 0.00 140.00
440428 SHNCON SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 2,343.00 440429 SIGMAALD Sigma-Aldritch, Inc. 04/07/2022 0.00 3,782.09 440430 SILVER&W Silver & Wright LLP 04/07/2022 0.00 5,689.02 440431 DNOFFI Debra Stover 04/07/2022 0.00 1,296.19
440432 TECHNI Technical Systems Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 22,578.47 440433 TIDEWA Tidewater Contractors Inc 04/07/2022 0.00 23,200.00 440434 CALCARDS US Bank Corporate Pmt Systems 04/07/2022 0.00 17,933.81 440435 UB*05490 RANDALL VANCE 04/07/2022 0.00 90.05
440436 VERIZO3 Verizon Wireless Services LLC 04/07/2022 0.00 297.79 440437 VITAL Vital Hospitality LLC (Quality Inn) 04/07/2022 0.00 7,182.39 440438 CACEHA Wiececke and Associates 04/07/2022 0.00 986.74 Report Total (69 checks): 0.00 323,108.83
AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (4/13/2022 12:09 PM) Page 2 AP
3-26-22 to 4-8-22 Council
User: crawlings
Printed: 4/13/2022 12:07:16 PM
Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For Vo 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2185-00000 PR Batch 00001.04.2022 State Income Tax 2,348.85 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2185-00000 PR Batch 00011.04.2022 State Income Tax 1,743.56 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2185-00000 PR Batch 00111.04.2022 State Income Tax 2,525.18 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2188-00000 PR Batch 00011.04.2022 Medicare Employee Portion 978.07 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2189-00000 PR Batch 00111.04.2022 Federal Income Tax 5,976.61 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2188-00000 PR Batch 00001.04.2022 Medicare Employee Portion 1,243.25 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2188-00000 PR Batch 00001.04.2022 Medicare Employer Portion 1,243.25 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2188-00000 PR Batch 00111.04.2022 Medicare Employer Portion 464.62 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2189-00000 PR Batch 00011.04.2022 Federal Income Tax 6,234.60 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2188-00000 PR Batch 00011.04.2022 Medicare Employer Portion 978.07 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2189-00000 PR Batch 00001.04.2022 Federal Income Tax 8,210.57 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2188-00000 PR Batch 00111.04.2022 Medicare Employee Portion 464.62 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00011.04.2022 Survivor Benefit 17.83 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00001.04.2022 ER Contribution 7,767.05 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00001.04.2022 Survivor Benefit 29.76 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00001.04.2022 Service Credit Purchase 413.20 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00011.04.2022 ER Contribution 6,966.38 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00001.04.2022 EE Contribution 5,928.65 False 0 4/4/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00011.04.2022 EE Contribution 4,810.83 False 440373 4/4/2022 610-000-2170-00000 PR Batch 00001.04.2022 Child Support-CA 158.76 False 440374 4/4/2022 610-000-2184-00000 PR Batch 00001.04.2022 CCEA Monthly Dues 60.00 False 440374 4/4/2022 610-000-2184-00000 PR Batch 00011.04.2022 CCEA Monthly Dues 5.00 False 440375 4/4/2022 610-000-2181-00000 PR Batch 00011.04.2022 CCPOA Dues 500.00 False 440376 4/4/2022 610-000-2178-00000 Plan #300878 449.88 False 440376 4/4/2022 610-000-2186-00000 Plan #306752 1,986.67 False 440376 4/4/2022 610-000-2178-00000 Plan #300878 800.00 False 440376 4/4/2022 610-000-2178-00000 Plan #300878 1,915.00 False 440376 4/4/2022 610-000-2186-00000 Plan #306752 713.27 False 440376 4/4/2022 610-000-2186-00000 Plan #306752 416.56 False 440376 4/4/2022 610-000-2186-00000 Plan #306752 149.58 False 440377 4/7/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 108636-000, 992 FRESNO ST 207.18 False 440378 4/7/2022 419-000-2115-00000 BOV Connection - Feb 22 2,880.00 False 440378 4/7/2022 419-372-3821-41028 BOV Connection Maint - Feb 22 6,142.62 False 440378 4/7/2022 419-372-3821-41028 BOV Connection Admin Fee - Feb 22 -72.00 False 440379 4/7/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 006147-000, 332 W COOPER AVE 80.00 False 440380 4/7/2022 001-230-4220-00000 Fuel 292.91 False
440380 4/7/2022 001-471-4220-00000 Propane 11.00 False
440380 4/7/2022 001-480-4220-2020S Propane 9,333.08 False 440380 4/7/2022 001-230-4220-00000 Fuel 275.57 False
440381 4/7/2022 412-100-4450-00000 Mar 22 Services 150.00 False 440382 4/7/2022 508-508-4530-00000 Balance due for 3/22-3/25/22 travel to CA Fire Mechanics Academy 99.75 False 440383 4/7/2022 001-470-4390-00000 air filter/ngk plung/primer bulb 22.22 False 440384 4/7/2022 001-240-4330-00000 fuel 271.77 False
440384 4/7/2022 001-240-4330-00000 fuel 1,260.72 False
440385 4/7/2022 001-471-4450-00000 Conveyance #055826 225.00 False AP - 3-26-22 to 4-8-22 Council (4/13/2022) Page 1 of 6
Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For Vo 440386 4/7/2022 001-251-3312-00000 Admin fees collection Jan-Mar 22 52.00 False 440386 4/7/2022 001-251-3312-00000 Admin fees collection Jan-Mar 22 (retained) -5.20 False 440387 4/7/2022 001-364-4350-10023 LED pack 407.96 False 440389 4/7/2022 420-115-4230-00000 Fiber Internet DIA @ 520 I St-3/21-4/20/22 399.00 False 440389 4/7/2022 419-371-4230-00000 broadband for security-3/26-4/25/22 89.99 False 440389 4/7/2022 413-353-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 4.41 False 440389 4/7/2022 419-120-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 25.62 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-470-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 2.94 False 440389 4/7/2022 412-100-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 4.62 False 440389 4/7/2022 419-111-4230-00000 Internet Service- 3/27-2/26/22 4.41 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-313-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 3.78 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-364-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 4.62 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-251-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 6.09 False 440389 4/7/2022 419-371-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 15.74 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-471-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 2.94 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-111-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 5.04 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-350-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 10.08 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-250-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 1.68 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-113-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 13.65 False 440389 4/7/2022 413-352-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 11.13 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-114-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 13.65 False 440389 4/7/2022 413-120-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 27.30 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-120-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 28.35 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-480-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 2.94 False 440389 4/7/2022 413-111-4230-00000 Internet Service- 3/27-2/26/22 3.99 False 440389 4/7/2022 420-115-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 13.64 False 440389 4/7/2022 420-115-4230-00000 Fiber Internet DIA @ 520 I St-1/21-2/20/22 399.00 False 440389 4/7/2022 001-240-4230-00000 Internet Service - 3/30-4/29/22 134.98 False 440390 4/7/2022 419-372-3822-41029 Water Maint - Feb 22 509.65 False 440391 4/7/2022 153-485-4796-20mep 20-CDBG-12040 Micro TA Program Operations 16,213.00 False 440391 4/7/2022 153-485-4796-20bap 20-CDBG-12056 Business Assistance Program Operator 7,018.00 False 440392 4/7/2022 001-240-4550-00000 2022 Membership dues for CA Law Enf Assoc Records Supervisors 50.00 False 440393 4/7/2022 001-240-4407-00000 Police Records Speicalist Ad 188.00 False 440393 4/7/2022 001-313-4430-00000 Planning Commission Notice of Public Hearing 100.13 False 440393 4/7/2022 001-350-4407-00000 Engineering Techinican Ad 44.60 False 440393 4/7/2022 001-112-4407-00000 Econimic Dev/Recreation Director Ad 30.00 False 440393 4/7/2022 001-350-4407-00000 Engineering Technician Ad 44.60 False 440393 4/7/2022 001-350-4407-00000 Office Technician Ad 29.00 False 440393 4/7/2022 001-350-4407-00000 Office Technician Ad 29.00 False 440393 4/7/2022 413-120-4430-00000 City of Crescent City FY 21 Financial Summary 123.07 False 440393 4/7/2022 413-352-4430-00000 Notice of Public Review - Sewer System Management Plan 100.13 False 440393 4/7/2022 001-350-4407-00000 Engineering Technician Ad 44.60 False 440393 4/7/2022 001-120-4430-00000 City of Crescent City FY 21 Financial Summary 123.07 False 440393 4/7/2022 419-120-4430-00000 City of Crescent City FY 21 Financial Summary 123.06 False 440393 4/7/2022 001-364-4409-00000 Request for Qualifications...Engineering 73.43 False 440393 4/7/2022 001-350-4407-00000 Engineering Technician Ad 44.60 False 440394 4/7/2022 419-372-3823-41030 Water Maint - Feb 22 708.02 False 440395 4/7/2022 001-113-4450-00000 Mar 22 Use of Board Chambers 145.00 False 440396 4/7/2022 001-000-4782-00000 Property tax in lieu of VLF - Feb 22 33,386.36 False 440396 4/7/2022 117-364-4789-00000 RMRA - Nov 21 1,665.83 False 440396 4/7/2022 117-364-4789-00000 RMRA - Dec 21 1,538.58 False 440396 4/7/2022 115-364-4785-00000 Gas Tax Section 2105-Jan 22 430.41 False 440396 4/7/2022 115-364-4787-00000 Gas Tax Section 2107-Jan 22 587.86 False 440396 4/7/2022 001-000-4782-00000 Property tax in lieu of VLF-Jan 22 1,115.98 False 440397 4/7/2022 001-000-2150-00000 Seismic fees collected (commerical) - Jan - Mar 22 78.87 False AP - 3-26-22 to 4-8-22 Council (4/13/2022) Page 2 of 6
Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For Vo 440397 4/7/2022 001-000-2140-00000 Seismic fees collected (residential) - Jan - Mar 22 37.54 False 440398 4/7/2022 419-371-4230-00000 707-001-0001 SCADA telemetry link 3/28-4/27/22 42.72 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-111-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone - 3/30-4/29/22 18.67 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-113-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone - 3/30-4/29/22 50.58 False 440398 4/7/2022 413-353-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 16.33 False 440398 4/7/2022 413-352-4230-00000 WWTP phone 3/30-4/29/22 280.17 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-313-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 14.00 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-114-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone - 3/30-4/29/22 50.58 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-480-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 10.89 False 440398 4/7/2022 419-120-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 94.93 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-250-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 6.23 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-470-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 10.90 False 440398 4/7/2022 413-352-4230-00000 Treatment Plant Phone: 465-3054 3/30-4/29/22 176.65 False 440398 4/7/2022 419-111-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 16.34 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-471-4230-00000 Cult Cntr Elev Alrm 707-464-4582 3/30-4/29/22 75.70 False 440398 4/7/2022 419-371-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 58.35 False 440398 4/7/2022 420-115-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 50.57 False 440398 4/7/2022 413-111-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 14.79 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-480-4230-00000 Pool Phone 465-5761 - 3/30-4/29/22 136.35 False 440398 4/7/2022 413-120-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 101.15 False 440398 4/7/2022 413-352-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 41.24 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-350-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 37.34 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-364-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 17.12 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-471-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 10.89 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-251-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 22.57 False 440398 4/7/2022 412-100-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 17.12 False 440398 4/7/2022 001-120-4230-00000 City Hall Shared Phone - 3/30-4/29/22 105.04 False 440399 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 fuel filter 75.52 False 440399 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 oil filter/exactfitblade 26.92 False 440399 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 fuel filters 48.36 False 440399 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 water pump/serpentine belt 61.31 False 440399 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 oil filter 9.79 False 440399 4/7/2022 001-230-4391-00000 oil filter/water separator #5110 74.51 False 440399 4/7/2022 001-230-4391-2020S 5w30 bay boxes 393.20 False 440399 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-60001 oil filters 110.36 False 440399 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-60001 15w40 bay boxes 426.46 False 440399 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 oil filter 6.61 False 440400 4/7/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 111093-000, 801 SPRUCE ST 250.00 False 440401 4/7/2022 413-353-4390-00000 impact wrench 148.84 False 440401 4/7/2022 419-371-4390-00000 impact wrench 148.84 False 440401 4/7/2022 001-480-4390-00000 pivot hinge 19.99 False 440401 4/7/2022 413-353-4390-00000 combination cartridge filter 143.22 False 440401 4/7/2022 419-371-4390-00000 combination cartridge filter 143.22 False 440402 4/7/2022 419-371-4390-00000 3/4" and 1" rubber gaskets 31.46 False 440403 4/7/2022 001-364-4450-10025 Tree debris removal with RMAP funds 770.00 False 440404 4/7/2022 413-351-4390-00000 Microbiology supplies 1,171.32 False 440405 4/7/2022 413-120-4310-00000 #10 Window Envelopes 110.01 False 440405 4/7/2022 001-120-4310-00000 #10 Window Envelopes 110.02 False 440405 4/7/2022 419-120-4310-00000 #10 Window Envelopes 110.02 False 440406 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 aluminum pipe 79.53 False 440406 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 Metal for fabrication 249.34 False 440406 4/7/2022 001-230-4391-00000 Metal for fabrication 725.73 False 440407 4/7/2022 001-230-4409-00000 Feb 22 150.00 False
440409 4/7/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 108952-001, 2726 ROY AVE 152.89 False 440410 4/7/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 110460-000, 1049 PACIFIC AVE #D 186.87 False AP - 3-26-22 to 4-8-22 Council (4/13/2022) Page 3 of 6
Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For Vo 440411 4/7/2022 508-508-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 20.18 False 440411 4/7/2022 413-351-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 19.36 False 440411 4/7/2022 413-353-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 29.32 False 440411 4/7/2022 001-120-4370-00000 City Hall mats 16.26 False 440411 4/7/2022 001-480-4450-00000 Pool mats 22.58 False 440411 4/7/2022 001-120-4370-00000 City Hall mats 16.26 False 440411 4/7/2022 508-508-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 20.18 False 440411 4/7/2022 413-351-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 13.68 False 440411 4/7/2022 413-353-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 29.32 False 440412 4/7/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 110643-000, 240 BREAKWATER DR 250.00 False 440413 4/7/2022 413-356-4390-35022 retaining ring 5.43 False 440414 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 Nitrile gloves 249.97 False 440416 4/7/2022 001-350-4530-00000 Reimbursement for travel expenses for PW Officer's 3/22-3/27/22 2,121.64 False 440417 4/7/2022 001-240-4390-00000 service HVAC 248.00 False 440418 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 oil & fuel filters 13.56 False 440418 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 battery 123.54 False 440418 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 antifreeze/safety tread 101.91 False 440418 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 V-belt & idler pulley 65.68 False 440418 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 idler pulley 18.62 False 440418 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 oil filter 11.52 False 440419 4/7/2022 001-471-4450-00000 Elevator maintenance-Apr 22 323.09 False 440420 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 Replacement center broom for street sweeper 606.66 False 440421 4/7/2022 508-508-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 986.44 False 440421 4/7/2022 413-111-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 12.34 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-350-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 31.17 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-364-4210-10023 Power 3/1-3/29/22 4,055.84 False 440421 4/7/2022 420-115-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 42.21 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-113-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 42.21 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-251-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 18.83 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-471-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 1,980.04 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-480-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 2,859.94 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-250-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 5.20 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-313-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 11.69 False 440421 4/7/2022 413-120-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 84.42 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-470-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 592.21 False 440421 4/7/2022 412-100-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 4,599.60 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-120-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 87.67 False 440421 4/7/2022 413-353-4210-35019 Power 3/1-3/29/22 390.99 False 440421 4/7/2022 419-120-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 79.23 False 440421 4/7/2022 419-371-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 13,612.60 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-111-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 15.59 False 440421 4/7/2022 413-351-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 773.73 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-240-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 547.42 False 440421 4/7/2022 413-353-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 29.30 False 440421 4/7/2022 419-111-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 13.64 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-230-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 465.70 False 440421 4/7/2022 001-114-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 42.21 False 440421 4/7/2022 413-352-4210-00000 Power 3/1-3/29/22 34.42 False 440422 4/7/2022 001-240-4380-00000 K9 food 92.23 False
440423 4/7/2022 001-230-4451-00000 Apr - May 22 Alarm Monitoring 143.97 False 440424 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 Urethane - 2017 Ford F350 423.17 False 440425 4/7/2022 412-100-4450-00000 Re-roof RV Park Office 13,424.00 False 440426 4/7/2022 001-230-4530-00000 MA Travel Exp Reimbursement - 7/1-7/3/21 416.03 False 440426 4/7/2022 001-230-4530-00000 MA Travel Exp Reimbursement - 7/10-7/22/21 334.30 False 440426 4/7/2022 001-230-4530-00000 MA Travel Exp Reimbursement - 9/16-9/30/21 1,374.31 False AP - 3-26-22 to 4-8-22 Council (4/13/2022) Page 4 of 6
Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For Vo 440427 4/7/2022 001-230-4451-00000 Janitorial services: once per week at City Station- Mar 22 140.00 False 440428 4/7/2022 117-364-4409-00ast TO #6 design reconstruction of A-Street-Feb 22 2,343.00 False 440429 4/7/2022 413-351-4685-00000 Annual proficiency testing required by ELAP for cert 1,266.89 False 440429 4/7/2022 413-351-4685-00000 Annual proficiency testing required by ELAP for cert 2,437.27 False 440429 4/7/2022 413-351-4685-00000 Annual proficiency testing required by ELAP for cert 77.93 False 440430 4/7/2022 001-250-4410-01430 Legal Services - Mar 22 for 1430 Margie St 299.00 False 440430 4/7/2022 001-250-4410-00200 Legal Services - Mar 22 for 200 A St 5,390.02 False 440431 4/7/2022 001-350-4310-00000 HP Color printer cartridges 407.37 False 440431 4/7/2022 419-371-4310-00000 HP Color printer cartridges 407.36 False 440431 4/7/2022 413-353-4310-00000 HP Color printer cartridges 407.37 False 440431 4/7/2022 001-230-4310-00000 office supplies 29.46 False 440432 4/7/2022 919-000-2112-00000 Final Notice Progress Payment #8 22,578.47 False 440433 4/7/2022 412-100-4450-00000 Installation of a concrete split rail fence at Lighthouse Cove 23,200.00 False 440434 4/7/2022 001-230-4391-00000 OHD: FTK testing system, adapter, battery, service contract 12,883.02 False 440434 4/7/2022 001-114-4390-00000 MEDIC FIRST AID INTNL: Reporting credit 0.50 False 440434 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 TALLANS: tires #17 320.00 False 440434 4/7/2022 413-353-4310-00000 AMAZON: color printer for K Smith 151.85 False 440434 4/7/2022 413-353-4310-00000 STAMPCO: self inking date stamp PW 42.97 False 440434 4/7/2022 413-351-4310-00000 AMAZON: webcam for Lab 27.11 False 440434 4/7/2022 001-350-4530-00000 CALCITIES REGISTRATION: PW Officer;s Conference 3/22-3/27/22 625.00 False 440434 4/7/2022 413-351-4310-00000 MADGETECH: calibration service kit 125.00 False 440434 4/7/2022 419-371-4310-00000 AMAZON: color printer for K Smith 151.86 False 440434 4/7/2022 419-371-4390-00000 HARBOR FRIEGHT: pry bar/gooseneck ball 45.54 False 440434 4/7/2022 001-240-4390-00000 EREPLACEMENTPATS: gate part for PD 103.64 False 440434 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 AMAZON: trailer light boxes 49.20 False 440434 4/7/2022 001-240-4390-00000 NORTHSHOREDOOR: saftey photo beam kit 216.01 False 440434 4/7/2022 001-350-4310-00000 STAMPCO: self inking date stamp PW 42.97 False 440434 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 AMAZON: unpainted steel fenders 183.37 False 440434 4/7/2022 419-371-4310-00000 STAMPCO: self inking date stamp PW 42.97 False 440434 4/7/2022 001-350-4310-00000 AMAZON: color printer for K Smith 151.86 False 440434 4/7/2022 413-120-4530-00000 Webinar traiing for UB and Civic Pay- Rawlings 450.00 False 440434 4/7/2022 419-120-4530-00000 Webinar traiing for UB and Civic Pay-Ingram 450.00 False 440434 4/7/2022 412-100-4230-00000 DISH: cable service 2/25-3/24/22 773.58 False 440434 4/7/2022 001-120-4550-00000 GOVERNMENT FINANCE: GFOA Membership for Leaver 56.67 False 440434 4/7/2022 419-120-4550-00000 GOVERNMENT FINANCE: GFOA Membership for Leaver 56.66 False 440434 4/7/2022 413-120-4550-00000 GOVERNMENT FINANCE: GAAFR Rawlings 43.00 False 440434 4/7/2022 001-120-4530-00000 GOVERNMENT FINANCE: webinar 85.00 False 440434 4/7/2022 001-480-4390-00000 LIQUIGUARD: pool deck coating 539.80 False 440434 4/7/2022 419-120-4550-00000 GOVERNMENT FINANCE: GAAFR Rawlings 43.00 False 440434 4/7/2022 001-120-4550-00000 GOVERNMENT FINANCE: GAAFR Rawlings 43.00 False 440434 4/7/2022 413-120-4550-00000 GOVERNMENT FINANCE: GFOA Membership for Leaver 56.67 False 440435 4/7/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 008303-001, 700 REDDY AVE 90.05 False 440436 4/7/2022 419-371-4230-00000 Water SCADA Cellular-02/24-03/23/22 297.79 False 440437 4/7/2022 001-000-3220-00000 Reimburse overpayment of TOT Nov 21 - Jan 22 7,182.39 False 440438 4/7/2022 506-506-4390-00000 paint 63.46 False
440438 4/7/2022 001-470-4390-00000 keys 7.67 False
440438 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 anit slip tape 4.97 False 440438 4/7/2022 506-506-4390-00000 caulk 39.02 False
440438 4/7/2022 506-506-4390-00000 paint 38.78 False
440438 4/7/2022 506-506-4390-00000 painting supplies 62.06 False 440438 4/7/2022 419-371-4390-00000 saw blade set/19' blade/nylon nuts 55.14 False 440438 4/7/2022 001-480-4390-00000 roller cover 10.39 False 440438 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 cut rope or chain 48.52 False 440438 4/7/2022 419-371-4390-00000 screwdriver 1/4 x 4' slot 9.36 False 440438 4/7/2022 419-371-4390-00000 Discovery 1100 118.27 False AP - 3-26-22 to 4-8-22 Council (4/13/2022) Page 5 of 6
Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For Vo 440438 4/7/2022 419-371-4390-00000 Discovery 1100 184.44 False 440438 4/7/2022 001-364-4390-10025 6x6x18' posts 246.57 False 440438 4/7/2022 419-371-4390-00000 Discovery 1100 RETURN -184.44 False 440438 4/7/2022 001-480-4390-00000 muriatic acid 31.20 False 440438 4/7/2022 001-480-4390-00000 muriatic acid 124.84 False 440438 4/7/2022 508-508-4390-00000 screws/nuts/bolts 11.43 False 440438 4/7/2022 506-506-4390-00000 lube triflow spray 19.52 False 440438 4/7/2022 506-506-4390-00000 plungers 44.90 False 440438 4/7/2022 506-506-4390-00000 lock/keys 34.28 False 440438 4/7/2022 001-470-4390-00000 3/8 tube 7.01 False
440438 4/7/2022 419-371-4390-00000 2" pro soltns 9.35 False AP - 3-26-22 to 4-8-22 Council (4/13/2022) Page 6 of 6
297,608.56
AP
3-26-22 to 4-8-22 Housing
User: crawlings
Printed: 4/13/2022 12:11:58 PM
Check Date Check Numbe Description Amount Selected For Void 4/7/2022 440389 Internet Service - 3/27-2/26/22 3.36 False 4/7/2022 440388 Work employment verification for tenants Jan 22 10.00 False 4/7/2022 440398 City Hall Shared Phone- 3/30-4/29/22 12.45 False 4/7/2022 440431 office supplies 44.63 False
4/7/2022 440393 HA Annual Plan 46.73 False
4/7/2022 440415 office supplies 59.27 False
4/7/2022 440423 window remodel 120.00 False
4/7/2022 440434 WALMART: smoke alarms 173.56 False
4/7/2022 440393 HA Public Notice 240.30 False
4/7/2022 440417 service HVAC 248.00 False
4/7/2022 440421 Power 3/1-3/29/22 277.67 False
4/7/2022 440408 HA building repair 24,264.30 False
25,500.27
AP - 3-26-22 to 4-8-22 Housing (4/13/2022) Page 1 of 1
April 9, 2022
April 15, 2022
110620-110628
Regular Pay Overtime Gross Pay # Empl Notes
Dept #110
City Council 1,409.84 1,409.84 5
Dept #111
Admin/City Manager 11,350.64 483.40 11,834.04 3
Dept #112
Comm Dev/Recreation 2,959.26 943.27 3,902.53 1
Dept #114
Human Resources 2,496.81 257.49 2,754.30 1
Dept #120
Finance/Utility Billing 14,184.67 162.64 14,347.31 6
Dept #130
City Attorney 4,544.78 4,544.78 1
Dept #230
Fire Department 6,739.60 6,739.60 2
Dept #240
Police Department 33,498.36 4,548.22 38,046.58 11
Dept #313
Planning 1,426.56 1 Part-time
Dept #350
Public Works-All Depts 44,051.90 1,120.34 45,172.24 18
Dept #450
Recreation & Events 2,273.33 1 + 1 Part-time
Dept #480
Swimming Pool Fund 9,969.28 178.53 10,147.81 2 + 16 Part-time Dept #490
Housing Authority 9,514.91 9,514.91 4
TOTALS 140,720.05 7,693.89 152,113.83 57 + 187Part-time The payroll summarized above is listed where assigned. The actual costs of each employee are allocated each pay period to the department and/or fund where the actual work was performed.
CHECK NUMBERS
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY PAYROLL END DATE
BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL REPORT PAYROLL PAID DATE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: APRIL 18, 2022
SUBJECT: CITY OF CRESCENT CITY PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT ______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Appoint Mohammed Amer the City of Crescent City Planning Commission to fill the vacant position with his term ending in May of 2025.
BACKGROUND
Former Planning Commissioner Ray Altman was recently appointed by the City Council to fill a vacant Council position. The Commission continues to have one vacancy on the five-member Planning Commission.
Two applications were received by the City for the Planning Commission vacancy.
Below are the current commissioners and respective terms:
NAME
APPOINTMENT
DATE
TERM ENDS TITLE
John Wendt Appointed October 19 May 2023 Chair as of April 2021
Ray Walp Appointed October 2019 May 2023 Vice Chair
Betsy Dewar Appointed August 2021 May 2025
Brad Kime Original appointment March 2016
Extended in 2019
May 2023
Open May 2025
ITEM ANALYSIS
Two applicants were interviewed by John Wendt, Chair of the Planning Commission, and Jon Olson, Community Development Director. Chairman Wendt and Director Olson agree Planning Commissioner Appointment
April 18, 2022
2 that both applicants meet the qualifications to be a Planning Commissioners but are recommending Mohammed Amer be appointment by Mayor Greenough.
Crescent City Municipal Code (CCMC) Section 2.28.040 states that members of the Commission shall be appointed by the Mayor, with the approval of the City Council.
CCMC Section 2.28.020 establishes the term for Commissioners at four (4) years. If appointed Mr. Amer’s term would expire in May 2025.
If Mayor Greenough appoints Mr. Amer to the Planning Commission and the City Council confirms, the Planning Commission will be full.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
This is a budgeted item. Planning Commissioners are paid a nominal fee of $75.00 every three months to serve on the Planning Commission.
STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
GOAL 1: Support quality services, community safety, and health to enhance the quality of life and experience of our residents and visitors.
GOAL 2: Promote a thriving local economy
ATTACHMENTS
1. Mohammed Amer’s Application
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
377 J STREET
CRESCENT CITY, CA 95531
707-464-7483
Applicant Information
Name:
Phone Nos.:
Is the City of Crescent City the place of your legal residence? YES _______ NO ________ Are you registered to vote in the City of Crescent City? YES _______ NO _________ What is your availability for meetings during the week? Brief Resume:
Applicant Declaration
I, the undersigned applicant, do hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information contained in this application is true and correct.
Dated: _______________________ _____________________________________ Applicant Signature
THIS DOCUMENT IS PUBLIC INFORMATION
(Through November 2025)
TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
Commissioner Betsy Dewar Commissioner Brad Kime
Chairman John Wendt Vice Chair Ray Walp
Amer, Mohammad
661-717-2591
Any time after 03:00 PM Tues-Fri
03/09/2022
I work in Pelican Bay State prison as a Chaplain. I do hold 2 bachelor degrees one in Biochemistry & Microbiology, and the other one in Jurisprudence and Law.
I'm having more than 35 years of experience in many vital positions and engaging with public from different spectra. I'm also holding a license of addiction councling from the CCAPP as an addiction counselor, and I do have a vast experience of working interpersonal skills plus time-management. I'm a team player and I'm a good listener, and I look forward of serving the City of Crescent City which I've been here living for more than a year. I thank you for reading my application and I hope that I'll join your team in a timely manner.
Address:1190 California St, Crescent City, CA 95531
Applicant Name: ______________________________________________
SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE
2. What experience do you have working for a public agency or sitting on a public board or committee?
*Additional pages may be attached if necessary.
1. Why do you want to serve on the Planning Commission?
3. Please list those issues that you believe are important to the City's future.
4. Provide any additional information that you feel is relevant to your application.
Amer, Mohammad
Some issues which I do believe it's so important to tackle first and foremost is to expand the resources for finding more jobs other than the PBSP. It's imperative for our community to look outside the box and generate more jobs to area by attracting investors into our area. Encouraging more tourism could be another issue that we should pay attention to it as a vital resource. The infrastructure for Hwy 101 & 199 is extremely fundamental for serving our community and being able to travel without any further delays as what's happening right now. The homeless community and their migration from one state to another is an important issue that we should work on and lastly youth activities are an important issue for our community and we want to keep our kids in Crescent City even if they went to college somewhere else, but hopefully they will come to our City after pursuing their education.
I work for the State of California since 2013, and I'm also holding the position of Disability Advisory committee (DAC) in CDCR. I deal with different sectors of populations every day whether other employees, inmates, or even visitors, and I had the pleasure to run the Student board of Taft College last year by running 2 student clubs plus being the treasurer of my kids’ parent club as well.
Because I know how to manage time and utilize all resources around to maximize out the benefits at the end. When it comes to managerial skills.
You can rest assured that it will be delivered professionally and with courtesy.
I truly believe in team work and that matter is extremely important to make any project or work task with a successful outcome and as we hope or anticipate for the future. Making the right decision is the most important factor of any project, and be able to focus on the solution of any problem is more effective than focusing on the problem itself.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
DATE: APRIL 18, 2022
SUBJECT: DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & RECREATION
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
RECOMMENDATION
• Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-26, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY APPOINTING ASHLEY TAYLOR
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION AND
APPROVING AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
BACKGROUND
On December 20, 2021 the position of Director of Economic Development and Recreation for the City of Crescent City was added to the Position Control as a result of a November 8 , 2021 Strategic Organizational Workshop where City Council approved and directed staff to create the Director of Economic Development and Recreation job description.
The recruitment process started immediately and was advertised and openly recruited for from January 2022 to February 2022. This new position reflects the City’s commitment to dedicating resources to economic development as well as programs and opportunities that improve the quality of life for our residents. The Director will be directly responsible for planning, directing, supervising and coordinating economic development and grant initiatives, recreational activities within the City parks, as well as management of the Lighthouse Cove RV Park, Cultural Center and Fred Endert Municipal Pool. This position will also be responsible for coordinating and facilitating special events and to provide assistance to the City Manager’s office on special projects and programs. One of the goals of this position will be to evaluate and implement the Economic Development Strategic Action Plan (EDSAP) that the Council Adopted in June as well as community events in the park.
As discussed at the Strategic Organizational Meeting one of the most critical aspects of this position will be to expend and build community relationships. Navigating the pandemic has shown just how important this engagement is and being able to reach our full potential is only possible through the partnerships we create. The Director will be responsible for coordinating a variety of programs, events and activities that provide a well-rounded number of things for a variety of community members and working with other organizations and agencies as needed.
From a highly competitive recruitment with well qualified candidates, Ms. Taylor was determined by City Manager and the Interview Panel to be the best fit for the position. She met or exceeded the desired education and experience required for the position.
ANALYSIS
Ms. Taylor has extensive experience in program coordination, recreation, and community outreach as well as working with youth. As she stated in her application she is “very passionate about the business of recreation as it is a department within cities that can promote a high quality of life, as well as provide economic vitality for a community”. This passion will be essential in achieving the Council’s direction when this position was authorized.
Crescent City Municipal Code 2.08.080 states that it shall be the duty of the City Manager to appoint, remove, promote and demote any and all officers and employees of the city, except as otherwise provided herein. The appointment or removal of any department head shall be subject to approval of the City Council.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The employment agreement reflects a starting salary of $86,461 which is the base salary within the annual salary range for the Director of Economic Development and Recreation position and will receive the same benefits as the base benefits specified in that certain Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Crescent City Management Employees’ Association. The position is included in the approved FY21-22budget and no additional appropriations are required.
STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS
This action supports the following Strategic Plan goals:
Goal 1: Support quality services, community safety, and health to enhance the quality of life and experience of our residents and visitors
Goal 1(E): Target economic development improvements that provide additional benefit by enhancing quality of life for residents
Goal 2(C): Research and implement methods to increase local tourism and funding for tourism promotion
Goal 2(F)(2): Maximize the use of the Cultural Center in a way that provides measurable value to the community
Goal 2(F)(3): Aid or lead in the promotion and coordination of community-wide events Goal 2(F)(7): Engage with residents, visitors, and businesses through ongoing marketing of City products, services, and facilities
Goal 3(C): Maximize performance and value in all City Council, staff, volunteer and committee positions
Goal 3(E): Recruit and retain highly qualified employees
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 2022—26
2. Director of Economic Development and Recreation Employment Agreement CITY OF CRESCENT CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-26 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
APPOINTING ASHLEY TAYLOR DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND
RECREATION AND APPROVING AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the position of Director of Economic Development and Recreation is a new position and was approved by the City Council and added to position control at a meeting held December 20, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the City has conducted an external recruitment for the City’s first Director of Economic Development and Recreation; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has selected Ashley Taylor, who is qualified and meets the desired education and experience for the Director of Economic Development and Recreation; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager wishes to officially appoint and employ Ashley Taylor as the Director of Economic Development and Recreation of the City of Crescent City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Crescent City, California, that:
1. The City Manager’s appointment of Ashley Taylor as the Director of Economic Development and Recreation is hereby approved.
2. The Employment Agreement between the City of Crescent City and Ashley Montague Taylor, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is approved.
3. The City Manager is authorized to sign the Employment Agreement on behalf of the City.
PASSED AND ADOPTED and made effective the same day by the City Council of the City of Crescent City on this 18th day, of April 2022, by the following polled vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_____________________________
Jason Greenough, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Robin Patch, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ANDREW LEIGHTON, ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGER
DATE: APRIL 18, 2022
SUBJECT: GENERATOR PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AT WATER SYSTEM
PRESSURE REGULATING FACILITY
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Authorize the City Manager to sign the Small Public Works Agreement with Northridge Electric for the installation of a 30kW generator at the Wonderstump Pressure Regulating Facility (PRF) and direct staff to reallocate funding from the Chlorination Facility Generator Replacement project to the PRF generator installation project
BACKGROUND
The Elevated Tank located at the intersection of Wonder Stump Road and Highway 101 was constructed in 1958. The tank has a total capacity of 50,000 gallons with a water surface elevation of 210 feet above sea level and approximately 75 feet above the site ground elevation. This elevation is what provides consistent water pressure for the water system. This tank is a critical element of the Crescent City Water System.
Due to its age and visual appearance in April 2013, the City hired Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co. to complete a tank inspection and seismic assessment. As a result of these inspections, the tank was found to be vulnerable to damage and potential collapse during strong earthquake ground shaking predicted for this site. Collapse of the Tank is a potential life safety concern. Structural rehabilitation and seismic retrofit of the Elevated Water Tank to meet current seismic design standards was determined to be critical.
The Elevated Tank Seismic Retrofit Project, funded by a Proposition 84 2014 IRWM Drought Project Grant, was to strengthen the elevated water tank to survive a major earthquake. Additionally, certain important maintenance and safety improvements were also part of the project. The original scope of work for the retrofit project was strengthening the existing elevated tank to resist a major earthquake and to perform certain maintenance and required safety improvements. To complete this work would
PRV GENERATOR INSTALLATION
APRIL 18, 2022
2 have required the elevated tank to be taken out of service for several months, which required an alternative method to operate the water system and bypass the tank. It was decided to use a “pressure control valve” as the temporary means to operate the water system while the elevated tank work was being performed. The temporary PCV worked better than expected. With some minor adjustments and additions including a small emergency storage tank and better electronic controls a permanent Pressure Regulating Valve (PRV) system was developed.
The installation of the PRV system included three phases. Phase 1 built a Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) facility to house the pressure regulating valves and to install a 20,000-gallon ground level storage tank completed around June 2018. Phase 2 installed the new Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) to operate this new system with a more robust control strategy completed February 2022. Phase 3 will include an evaluation of the surge protection systems in place, and then dismantling and removing the existing elevated tank.
ITEM ANALYSIS
Maintaining pressure in the water distribution system is a critical element. The removal of the elevated tank will shift the means of maintaining pressure from an elevated tank to a mechanical PRV system with a SCADA control system. The SCADA controls and chemical monitoring equipment within the PRV building requires electricity to power in the event of a power outage. Prior to initiating Phase 3, it is optimal to install a generator at the PRV facility.
Scope of Northridge Electric proposal.
1. Installation of one new commercial rated Cummins Onan 30kW standby propane generator
2. Installation of one NEMA 3 automatic transfer switch
3. Installation of a 6-inch concrete pad for new generator
4. Installation of a 4-inch concrete pad for new propane tank
5. Trenching and backfill for electrical hookup
6. Redirection of 6-foot chain-link fence enclosing new generator Not included in Northridge Electric proposal.
1. Installation of a 199-gallon propane tank & piping
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Northridge Electric has submitted a proposal to accomplish this installation for the sum of Fifty-Seven Thousand Four Hundred and Forty-Seven Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($57,447.37). According to City procurement procedures, this project can be completed via force account or direct contract since it is less than $60,000.
Current FY21/22 budget allocates $20,000 for a new generator at the PRF and $40,000 to replace the generator at the Chlorination Facility. These values are sufficient only to purchase the hardware for the installation. Due to staffing shortages, installation of two
PRV GENERATOR INSTALLATION
APRIL 18, 2022
3 generators falls outside of the capability and capacity of City public works staff. Thus, staff recommends reallocating funding from the Chlorination Facility generator replacement project to the PRF generator installation project to cover the proposal from Northridge Electric for the installation of one generator at the PRF.
At the April 4, 2022 City Council meeting, the Council authorized staff to submit a CALOES grant application to fund the installation of a new generator at the Chlorination Building. If the City is not awarded grant funding, staff will bring this item back to the Council to consider allocating full funding from the Water Fund to complete this critical project.
STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
GOAL 1: Support quality services, community safety, and health to enhance the quality of life and experience of our residents and visitors.
D. Provide and maintain an efficient, adequate infrastructure to provide for both current and future community needs
GOAL 3: Obtain the highest levels of organizational excellence E. Recruit and retain highly qualified employees by:
• Adopting and revising annually the five-year capital improvement plans and implement projects as adopted for the City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant and Sewer System, the City’s Water System, the Drainage System, City Streets, City Facilities, and IT Administration
ATTACHMENTS
1. SPWA with Northridge Electric
CRESCENT CITY SMALL PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT Page | 1
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
AGREEMENT FOR
SMALL PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT
This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Crescent City, a California municipal corporation, and Contractor identified below, for the construction of a small public works project.
1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES.
a. City: City of Crescent City
Attn: City Manager
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
707-464-7483
b. Contractor: Northridge Electric / Lic. No. 475834
Attn: Matt Fearing
1279 2nd Street, Suite A
Crescent City, CA 95531
707-464-7790
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. The “Project” to be completed under this Agreement is for installation of a generator at the Wonderstump Pressure Reducing Valve building.
City has provided plans and specifications for the Project to Contractor, which are attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and incorporated herein by this reference. All work is to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard industry practices.
The Project includes the following work:
a. Installation of one (1) new commercial rated Cummins Onan 30kW 60Hz standby propane genset
b. Installation of one (1) new NEMA 3 automatic transfer switch mounted to the right of the existing 200Amp service entrance
c. Installation of a 6-inch concrete pad with perimeter footing for a new generator d. Underground electrical trenching and backfill
e. Redirect existing 6-foot chain-link fence to enclose the new generator f. Installation of a 4-inch concrete pad for new propane tank g. All labor and materials included
The Project includes the following work:
a. Installation of a 199-gallon propane tank and necessary supply piping.
3. COMPENSATION. The total compensation City will pay Contractor for construction and completion of the Project is Fifty-Seven Thousand and Four Hundred and FortySeven Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($57,447.37) (“Contract Price”) as detailed on the cost sheet attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and incorporated herein by this reference.
CRESCENT CITY SMALL PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT Page | 2
4. PREVAILING WAGE. Contractor is required to pay prevailing wages on this Project as determined by the Department of Industrial Relations.
5. DIR REGISTRATION. If the Project is for construction work and exceeds $25,000 or is for maintenance work and exceeds $15,000, Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor is registered with the Department of Industrial Relations.
6. SCHEDULE. The Project is to be commenced as directed by the City Engineer. The work will begin with a pre-construction meeting between Contractor and the City’s Public Works Director / City Engineer.
7. PAYMENT TERMS. The Contractor will be paid upon completion of the project. No retention will be withheld. Contractor is responsible to provide and pay for all costs associated with the prosecution of the Project, including, but not limited to: (i) labor, materials, equipment, tools, permits, and licenses necessary for the proper execution and completion of the work; (ii) required sales, consumer, and use taxes; and (iii) the cost of insurance premiums required by this Agreement.
8. CHANGES IN WORK. If City directs any modification or addition to the work covered by this Agreement, this Agreement will be adjusted accordingly. Modification or addition to the work will be effective when both City and Contractor have signed a Change Order. Contractor must promptly notify City of any unknown physical conditions that differ materially from those ordinarily encountered and recognized as inherent in work of the character provided in this Agreement. City as “extra work” agrees to pay for any expenses due to such conditions.
9. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. Contractor represents that Contractor has familiarized itself with the work site, locality, and all local conditions and laws and regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress, or performance of the work.
Contractor represents that it is duly licensed to perform the work as required by state and local laws and regulations.
10. DELAYS. Contractor agrees to start and diligently perform the work through to completion, but shall not be responsible for delay for any of the following reasons:
acts of neglect or omission of City, its elected and appointed officials, employees or agents, acts of God, inclement weather, strikes, lockouts, boycotts, or other labor unrest, extra work ordered by City, delays caused by inspection or changes ordered by authorized governmental bodies, or for other causes beyond the reasonable control of Contractor. Contractor must notify City of any anticipated delays.
11. PERSONNEL. Contractor will provide competent, suitable personnel to perform the work under this Agreement and at all times must maintain good discipline and order at the Project location.
12. SAFETY. Contractor is responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety precautions in connection with the work. Contractor must comply with all CRESCENT CITY SMALL PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT Page | 3
applicable laws and regulations relating to the safety of persons or property.
Interruptions to the flow of vehicular traffic must be kept to a minimum.
13. BOND REQUIREMENTS. Contractor is required to provide the following bonds for the Project (check all that apply):
☐ None. No bonds are required as part of this Agreement. ☒ Payment Bond in the amount of 100% of the Contract Price. (Required for Projects with a Contract Price of more than $25,000.)
☐ Performance Bond in the amount of 100% of the Contract Price. (Discretionary.)
14. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Contractor must maintain insurance policies with the following coverages and minimum amounts for the duration of this Agreement:
Coverage Type Minimum Limits
a. Commercial General Liability (CGL)
ISO Form CG 00 01, including products completed
operations, covering bodily injury, personal injury,
and property damage.
$1 million per occurrence; $2
million aggregate
b. Automobile Liability
ISO Form CA 0001 covering Code 1 – any auto,
property damage and bodily injury
$1 million per accident
c. Workers’ Compensation Statutory Limits
d. Employer’s Liability - for bodily injury or disease $1 million per accident
15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is operating as an independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Neither Contractor nor any of its employees are eligible to receive any of the rights or benefits otherwise available to City’s employees. Contractor is free from the direction and control of City over the means and manner of performing services under this Agreement, subject only to the right of City to specify the desired results. Contractor is solely responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, and salaries due its employees as required by law or other agreement.
16. ASBESTOS AND HAZARDOUS WASTE. If Contractor encounters asbestos or other hazardous materials, Contractor must immediately stop work and allow City to obtain a duly qualified asbestos and/or hazardous materials Contractor to perform the necessary work. If Contractor is qualified to remove asbestos or other hazardous materials, City may engage Contractor to do the work. Said work will be treated as extra work under this Agreement.
17. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
a. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents against any loss, CRESCENT CITY SMALL PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT Page | 4
liability, cost, expense, or damages of any kind whatsoever (including reasonably attorney’s fees) that arise out of or result from the performance of work under this Agreement but only to the extent caused in whole or in part by the acts or omissions, negligent or otherwise, of Contractor, its employees, agents or subcontractors.
b. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Contractor is required to comply with all state, county and local laws, ordinances and regulations in the performance of work under this Agreement.
c. ASSIGNMENT. Contractor may not assign any right or delegate any obligation hereunder without the written consent of City. Any purported assignment or delegation without such consent will be void and unenforceable and constitute a material breach of this Agreement.
d. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This Agreement is binding upon and insures to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.
e. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement is to be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Contractor have caused this Agreement to be executed this ____ day of _____________, 20_____ at Crescent City, California.
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY: CONTRACTOR:
By: Eric Wier, City Manager By: Matt Fearing
Its:
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: APRIL 18, 2022
SUBJECT: UPDATE TO CRESCENT CITY’S INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT
PROGRAM - LOCAL LIMITS
RECOMMENDATION
• Open public hearing
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from Council
• Receive public comment
• Close public hearing
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2022-27, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY MODIFYING THE LOCAL
LIMITS FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGES, AUTHORIZING THE
ENFORCEMENT OF SUCH LIMITS, AND THE INCLUSION OF LOCAL LIMITS
IN WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS
•
BACKGROUND
Federal water quality regulations require local governments to prevent the introduction of certain pollutants into their Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW), in order to prevent interference with wastewater treatment processes and pass through of pollutants, and provide for the use and disposal of municipal biosolids (sludge). This is accomplished through development and implementation and periodic reevaluation of specific effluent limits (local limits) for industrial users. These limits are developed to reflect the specific needs and capabilities at individual POTWs and protect the waterbody to which the POTW discharges.
The City prepared a workplan for reevaluation of local limits in 2017. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast Region (RWQCB) reviewed the workplan and provided comments. The workplan was updated in 2018 and sampling
LOCAL LIMITS UPDATE
April 18, 2022
2 was performed in September 2019 per the updated workplan. The technical justification for the modification of existing local limits is contained within the Technically Based Local Limit Study dated June 2020 was provided to the RWQCB in 2020. In 2021 the RWQCB indicated that the City could move forward with public notice and approval of the updated local limits.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The City received one comment from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast Region (RWQCB) (attached). The comment indicated that the only resulting concern was related to the removal of the local limit for zinc.
Within the Technically Based Local Limit Study dated June 2020 (FES, 2020) the conclusion was to eliminate the current local limit for zinc. Current wastewater data indicated that zinc is present at 50% of the modeled maximum allowable headworks loading (MAHL) for zinc. The general guideline is for establishing local limits is for contaminants that are present at 60% or greater the modeled MAHL.
Based on the limited amount and variability within the zinc data, it was decided to update the local limit for zinc to 11 mg/l instead of eliminating the current local limit of
0.0033 mg/l. The technical method for establishing the new local limit for zinc is contained within the Technically Based Local Limit Study dated June 2020 (FES, 2020) and is the result of modeling the local limit for zinc with a 25% safety margin applied to the model.
FISCAL IMPACT
If approved, the total fiscal impact is limited.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 2022-27
2. Technically Based Local Limit Study dated June 2020 and Transmittal letter to the RWQCB.
3. RWQCB April 9, 2022 Comments to Public Notice
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
MODIFYING THE LOCAL LIMITS FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGES, AUTHORIZING
THE ENFORCEMENT OF SUCH LIMITS, AND THE INCLUSION OF LOCAL LIMITS IN
WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS
WHEREAS, the City has adopted an Industrial Waste Pretreatment Ordinance, Chapter 13.40 INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT REQUIREMENTS, which establishes regulations for the discharge of Industrial Waste into the sewer system; and WHEREAS, the Industrial Waste Pretreatment Ordinance places the responsibility for the administration and enforcement for said Ordinance with the City, including the adoption, by way of resolution, and enforcement of Local Limits necessary to maintain EPA approval of the Industrial Pretreatment Program; and
WHEREAS, the City has performed an updated technical evaluation of the Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading (MAHL) for chemicals of concern including biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) (TECHNICALLY BASED LOCAL LIMIT STUDY, July 2020) following a methodology approved by the EPA and North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board; and
WHEREAS, through this updated technical evaluation the City has modified the concentrationbased Local Limits for some pollutants of concern and Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings (MAILs) as Local Limits for BOD and TSS.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY, CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Updated Local Limits contained in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 are hereby adopted and established as Local Limits regulating the discharge of Industrial Waste by Significant Industrial Users contributing to the sewer system and by all other Industrial Users that have been issued a Wastewater Discharge Permit, as defined in the Industrial Waste Pretreatment Ordinance.
SCHEDULE 1
LOCAL LIMITS, FOR SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USERS AND PERMIT HOLDERS Pollutant Local Limit Concentration in
(mg/L) ppm
Ammonia 32.0
Copper 0.086
Oil and Grease
(total)
100
Silver 0.084
Chromium 0.10
Zinc 11
CRESCENT CITY RESOLUTION No. 2022-27 Page | 2
2. The Local Limits in Schedule 1 apply at the point where wastewater is discharged to the POTW. All concentrations for metallic substances are for total metal unless indicated otherwise.
SCHEDULE 2
LOCAL LIMITS, MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE INDUSTRIAL LOADING (MAIL) TO BE
ALLOCATED AMONG ALL INDUSTRIAL USERS WITH WASTEWATER DISCHRGE
PERMITS
Pollutant Local Limit, Maximum Allowable
Industrial Loading (MAIL) pounds/day
BOD 1326
TSS 2482
3. The Local Limits in Schedule 2 constitute the total loading of each pollutant that may be allocated by the City among all Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit Holders, including all Significant Industrial Users, as defined in the Industrial Waste Pretreatment Ordinance. These allocations will be made by the City on a case-by-case basis and applied within each Permit to include the Daily Maximum Load of each pollutant that can be discharged by that User during a 24 hour period, an hourly maximum loading rate, and time of discharge limitations. These loading limits shall be considered numerical Pretreatment Standards (Local Limits) and shall be subject to all of the penalties listed in the Industrial Waste Pretreatment Ordinance, as amended from time to time.
4. This resolution supersedes any prior, conflicting resolutions.
5. This resolution is made effective 30 days after the date of its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Crescent City at a meeting thereof held on April 18, 2022 by the following polled vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_______________________________
Jason Greenough, Mayor
ATTEST:
Robin Patch, City Clerk
City ofCrescent City * Where the Redwoods Meet the Sea
377 J Street, Crescent City, CA 9553 1 • 707.464 .7483 • Fax 707.465.4405 • wwwcrcsccntcity.org • Designate and implement the local limits.
The City used a spreadsheet-based model developed by Region 5 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) to facilitate calculation of AHLs (Allowable Headworks Loading), MAHLs, and the proposed local limits consistent with the methodology contained in EPA's 2004 Local Limits Development Guidance. The resulting recommendations from the MAHL analysis are shown below:
- Proposed New
Pollutant Lim its in (mgIL)
ppm
Ammonia 32.0
Copper 0.086
Lead Eliminate-Limit
Nickel Eliminate Limit
Oil and Grease
(total) 100
bis (2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate Eliminate-Limit
Zinc Eliminate Limit
Silver 0.084
Chromium 0.10
The technical justification for the modification of existing local limits is contained within the Technically Based Local Limit Study dated June 2020 (FES, 2020).
Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)
A reevaluation ofloading limits for BOD was performed by Kennedy and Jenks and presented in a Technical Memorandum dated November 11, 2019 (Kennedy and Jenks, 2019) included as Attachment 3. The technical memorandum concludes that the loading limit or Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading (MAHL) for BOD is estimated to be approximately 4,590 pounds per day. Using the 2019 average flow, 2019 average BOD concentration results, and a 10% growth/safety factor, results in a Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAIL) of 1,326 pounds per day as show table and chart below.
ATTACHMENT 1
TECHNICALLY BASED LOCAL LIMIT STUDY
for
Crescent City Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF)
210 Battery Street
Crescent City, California
NPDES No. CA0022756
Prepared for:
The City of Crescent City
377 J Street
Crescent City, California 95531
July 2020
Prepared by:
Orrin Plocher and Stan Thiesen
of
78 Sunny Brae Center
Arcata, California 95521
Phone (707) 839-0091
Freshwater Environmental Services
City of Crescent City i July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPENDIX........................................................................................................... iii
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................1
2.0 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY DESCRIPTION..........................2
2.1 Facility, Location and Ownership.................................................................2
2.2 Facility Description ......................................................................................2
2.3 Collection System Description.....................................................................2
3.0 EXISTING LOCAL LIMITS AND DEVELOPMENT APPROACH ....................3
4.0 POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN .......................................................................4
5.0 SAMPLING AND MONITORING.....................................................................6
5.1 Treatment Plant Sampling...........................................................................6
5.2 Collection System Sampling........................................................................7
5.3 Sample Handling.........................................................................................7
5.4 Analytical Methods and Results ..................................................................7
5.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control...............................................................8
6.0 FLOW DATA...................................................................................................9
6.1 Total POTW Flow........................................................................................9
6.2 Sludge Flow to Disposal..............................................................................9
6.3 Flows from Controlled Sources ...................................................................9
6.4 Flows from Uncontrolled Sources................................................................9
7.0 CALCULATING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEADWORKS LOADING ..10
7.1 Calculating Removal Efficiencies ..............................................................10
7.2 Calculating Allowable Headworks Loading................................................12
7.3 Designation of Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading ..........................13
7.4 Calculation of Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading...............................13
8.0 DESIGNATING AND IMPLEMENTING LOCAL LIMITS ...............................15
8.1 Actual Loadings vs. MAHL ........................................................................15
8.2 Ammonia Nitrogen Total............................................................................16 City of Crescent City ii July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
8.3 Oil and Grease ..........................................................................................16
8.4 Chromium Total.........................................................................................16
8.5 Copper ......................................................................................................17
8.6 Silver .........................................................................................................17
8.7 Proposed Local Limits ...............................................................................17
9.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................19 City of Crescent City iii July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A LABORATORY RESULTS
APPENDIX B EPA Region 5 MAHL SPREADSHEET
APPENDIX C Biosolids Copper TTLC And STLC Laboratory Reports City of Crescent City 1 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Federal water quality regulations require local governments to prevent the introduction of certain pollutants into their Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW), in order to prevent interference with wastewater treatment processes and pass through of pollutants, and provide for the use and disposal of municipal biosolids (sludge). This is accomplished through development and implementation of specific effluent limits (local limits) for industrial users. These limits are developed to reflect the specific needs and capabilities at individual POTWs and protect the waterbody to which the POTW discharges.
Freshwater Environmental Services (FES) assisted Crescent City (the City) to develop a Local Limits Development Workplan for Crescent City Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) (FES, 2017). The California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast Region reviewed the workplan and provided comments. The workplan was updated in 2018 incorporating edits based on the California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast Region comments. Sampling was performed per the workplan updated in 2018.
The workplan, sampling, and study were prepared and conducted following the general principals contained in EPA’s 2004 Local Limits Development Guidance (EPA, 2004).
This Study contains the following elements:
• The Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) and collection system is described in Section 2.0;
• The existing local limits and development approach is presented in Section 3.0; • The pollutants of concern are presented in Section 4.0; • The sampling and analysis are described in Section 5.0; • Removal efficiencies are calculated in Section 6.0;
• Maximum allowable headworks loading (MAHL) is calculated in Section 7.0; • Allocation of MAHL to Industrial Users is presented in Section 8.0; and • The references cited in this report are listed in Section 9.0.
City of Crescent City 2 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
2.0 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY DESCRIPTION
2.1 Facility, Location and Ownership
Crescent City owns and operates a (WWTF) located at 210 Battery Street in Crescent City, Del Norte County, California. Discharges from the WWTF are regulated by National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit number CA0022756.
2.2 Facility Description
Information within the NPDES permit indicates that the City of Crescent City owns a wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal facility with a design average dry weather treatment capacity of 1.86 million gallons per day (MGD) for treating domestic/commercial, and industrial wastewater. The collection system service area includes the City of Crescent City and the County Service Area, which includes a total population of 15,573.
Treatment processes at the Crescent City WWTF consist of headworks, including a mechanically cleaned screen, a Parshall flume, and a wet well; primary treatment, including two grit removal tanks and two clarifiers; and secondary treatment. Secondary treatment is provided by operating rotating biological contactors and a membrane bioreactor in parallel. Flows from the rotating biological contactors and flow from the membrane bioreactor are commingled and disinfected and dechlorinated. Effluent is discharged to the Pacific Ocean. The 24-inch diameter ductile iron pipe outfall discharges into a rocky slot in the surf zone adjacent to the Battery Point Lighthouse and has an effluent conveyance capacity up to 13 MGD.
Solids handling consists of gravity thickening of primary sludge, rotary drum thickening of secondary sludge, and anaerobic digestion of thickened sludge. Dewatered solids are currently placed in a landfill.
2.3 Collection System Description
The Crescent City collection system has some unique characteristics that affect the local limits approach. The collection system is dominated by domestic/commercial users.
There are currently three Significant Industrial Users (SIU), Porta ‘O Pints Brewing Company, SeaQuake Brewing, and Rumiano Cheese. A seasonal seafood processor has been evaluated and it has been determined that a discharge permit is not warranted.
Commercial dischargers include Food Service Establishments (FSEs) that generate Fats, Oils and Greases (FOG). Beyond FSEs, commercial users are limited in numbers and potential impact. Non-FOG commercial users with the potential to impact the system are limited.
City of Crescent City 3 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
3.0 EXISTING LOCAL LIMITS AND DEVELOPMENT APPROACH
The City of Crescent City's existing local limits are shown in the Table below. The existing Crescent City local limits were developed based on the Crescent City Technical Basis for Wastewater Limits, (FES, 2012), and reevaluation of BOD and TSS in 2016 and are shown in the table below.
The City has reevaluated the existing local limits to determine if they are still protective of the POTW or need to be modified. The City used the Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading (MAHL) calculation methodology generally described in EPA’s 2004 Local Limits Development Guidance to establish its revised local limits. The MAHL methodology includes four basic steps:
• Determine the Pollutants of Concern (POC);
• Collect and analyze data;
• Calculate MAHLs for each POC; and
• Designate and implement the local limits.
The City used a spreadsheet-based model developed by Region 5 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) to facilitate calculation of AHLs (Allowable Headworks Loading), MAHLs, and the proposed local limits consistent with the methodology contained in EPA’s 2004 Local Limits Development Guidance.
After completing the MAHL methodology, local limits were adjusted to address collection system concerns and practical considerations.
City of Crescent City 4 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
4.0 POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN
A Pollutant of Concern (POC) is any pollutant that may be discharged to the POTW in sufficient amounts to pass through treatment processes, interfere with treatment processes, jeopardize worker health and safety, or cause operational problems. POCs may also include pollutants in the applicable NPDES permit or biosolids quality regulations. In order to determine the POCs to be evaluated, the City considered the following:
• Crescent City NPDES permit requirements;
• Biosolids quality regulations;
• Treatment process inhibition;
• Water Quality Criteria (California Ocean Plan, 2019); • Known Industrial Users;
• Sampling and violation history at the WWTF;
• California hazardous waste criteria;
• Current local limits; and
• EPA guidance documents.
Based on an evaluation of all compounds detected in influent samples since 2008, all compounds detected in effluent samples since the treatment system was optimized in 2010, a list of potential POCs with driving factors for further consideration was developed and resulted in a list of final POCs shown in the table below:
Pollutant of Concern
Conventional
Oil and Grease
Turbidity (NTU)
Settleable Solids (mg/L)
Ammonia Nitrogen total (as N)
Priority Pollutants Metals, Sulfur Compounds & Cyanide
Arsenic
Cadmium
Total Chromium
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Molybdenum
Mercury
Nickel
Sulfate
Sulfide
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
City of Crescent City 5 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services Organic Compounds
bis(2-ethylhexyl phthalate)
Dieldrin
City of Crescent City 6 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
5.0 SAMPLING AND MONITORING
All sampling was conducted under normal operating conditions during dry weather over the period of September 4, 2019 to September 11, 2019. Sampling followed the flow of the treatment process based on the hydraulic residence time (i.e., effluent sampling was conducted after influent sampling and lagged by the hydraulic residence time of approximately 4 hours). Specific sampling for local limits development was determined following an extensive review of existing data and potential non-domestic sources. The City also provided actual flow data regarding total POTW commercial/domestic wastewater flow, industrial wastewater flow, flow of sludge to the digesters, and flow of biosolids to disposal. The City used this data to calculate the load of each POC coming into the POTW. Wastewater samples were 24-hour, time-composited samples. Time composite samples consisted of hourly subsamples collected over a 24-hour period.
Sulfide and oil and grease samples were grab composite samples. Individual grab samples that were collected for the grab composite samples were handled, preserved, and composited in accordance with the guidance on pages 4-9 of the USEPA Guidance document. Aliquots were collected in separate containers, preserved appropriately, and composited manually at the laboratory to create a single sample for analysis.
Crescent City collected wastewater samples for seven consecutive days to characterize the changes in loading. Biosolids were sampled for 2 days, one weekday and one weekend day.
The local limits sampling locations include:
Treatment Plant Sampling:
• Headworks Influent (1 location)
• Final Effluent (1 location)
• Biosolids (dewatering facility)
Collection System Sampling:
• Domestic/commercial Collection System, (2 location)
• Industrial data was based on existing data from the three Significant Industrial Users (SIUs).
5.1 Treatment Plant Sampling
Influent samples and effluent samples were collected over 7 consecutive days separated by 4 hours (calculated hydraulic residence time) and analyzed for the POCs. Influent sampling was collected at a location prior to mixing with other wastewater streams.
Biosolids were sampled just prior to disposal over a two-day period within the week of influent/effluent sampling. The biosolid samples were manually composited over eight hours using equal hourly aliquots. Biosolid aliquots were collected into one container which were stored in the wastewater laboratory refrigerator. The eight-hour biosolid composite samples were homogenized and divided into the appropriate laboratory bottles at the end of each day and stored in the lab refrigerator overnight.
Except for copper, the maximum concentrations of metals in the biosolids samples are all less than 10 times the California STLC limits and therefore are not able to leach City of Crescent City 7 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services metals at concentrations that would make them a California hazardous waste. Copper in biosolids was further evaluated by having additional samples analyzed for leachable copper to determine STLC. Leachable copper was found to be less than the method detection limit and less than the California STLC limit for hazardous waste. Laboratory reports are contained in Appendix C.
Likewise, the maximum metals results are less than 20 times the EPA TCLP limits and therefore are not able to leach metals at concentrations that would make them an EPA hazardous waste. Additional analysis for characterization of hazardous waste is not warranted.
Sampling documentation did not note any infrequent, yet routine, activities occur during the sampling period. Examples of infrequent, yet routine, activities include receipt of hauled waste, tank cleaning, or other maintenance activities that might affect wastewater characteristics.
5.2 Collection System Sampling
Samples from two locations within the collection system were collected for seven consecutive days and analyzed for the POCs. The samples were from locations of predominantly domestic/commercial discharge. The sampling within the collection system was performed within the same seven-day period of influent/effluent sampling at the treatment plant.
5.3 Sample Handling
Wastewater samples were collected in laboratory provided containers labeled and immediately placed in an ice-cooled chest for delivery to an analytical laboratory certified by the California Department of Health Services for the required analyses. All sample handling included chain-of-custody documentation.
5.4 Analytical Methods and Results
All wastewater samples were analyzed utilizing the methods indicated in the table below:
City of Crescent City 8 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services All biosolid samples were analyzed utilizing the methods indicated in the table below:
The laboratory results for each POC are included in Appendix A.
5.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Following receipt of the laboratory analytical report all laboratory QC batches were checked to ensure that the correct number of samples were analyzed, the holding times were not exceeded, surrogate recoveries were within stated control limits, and that Laboratory Method Blanks, Matrix Spikes (MSs), Matrix Spike Duplicates (MSDs), Laboratory Control Samples (LCSs) and Laboratory Control Sample Duplicates (LCSDs) were all tested and within the laboratory-provided acceptable limits.
City of Crescent City 9 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
6.0 FLOW DATA
To calculate MAHLs and Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAILs), data about the flow of various wastestreams is required to allow mass quantities to be computed.
Required flow data are described in the following sections.
6.1 Total POTW Flow
The average daily influent flow for the past 12 months (Nov 2018 – Oct 2019) (1.461 MGD) was used as Total POTW flow (Qpotw) for loading calculations as shown below:
Qpotw = 1.461 MGD
6.2 Sludge Flow to Disposal
The average daily flow of all volume of sludge from digester to belt press for the past 12 months (Nov 2018 – Oct 2019) (0.228 MGD) was used as (Qsldg ) for loading calculations.
Qsldg = 0.228 MGD
6.3 Flows from Controlled Sources
Crescent City has three significant industrial users (SIUs) that discharged wastewater estimated at an average of 0.048 MGD in 2019.
6.4 Flows from Uncontrolled Sources
Flows from uncontrolled sources to be used in loading calculations was estimated by subtracting the industrial flow from the total POTW flow 1.266 MGD.
City of Crescent City 10 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
7.0 CALCULATING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEADWORKS LOADING The Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading (MAHL) is the estimated maximum loading of a pollutant that can be received by a POTW without inhibiting treatment processes or exceeding any applicable environmental criteria. The City followed the steps below to determine the MAHL for each POC:
1. Determine the removal efficiencies for each POC;
2. Calculate the Allowable Headworks Loading (AHL) for each POC, for all applicable environmental criteria, based on influent flow rates and POC removal efficiencies; and
3. Designate the MAHL as the strictest AHL.
The City used a spreadsheet-based model developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) Region 5 to facilitate calculation of AHLs, MAHLs, and the proposed local limits (Appendix B).
7.1 Calculating Removal Efficiencies
The City calculated POTW removal efficiency utilizing the formula for Mean Removal Efficiency (MRE) and Average Daily Removal Efficiency (ADRE).
City of Crescent City 11 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services MREs or ADREs were not calculated for the POCs listed below for the following reasons:
Pollutant of Concern Comments from Data Set
Priority Pollutants Metals, sulfur compounds & Cyanide
Cyanide All NDs or J-flags
Lead Single detection in collection system
Mercury Single detection in influent
Sulfate
Sulfate is generated as part of the wastewater
treatment process. Effluent concentrations were
always greater than influent concentrations.
Sulfide No treatment plant or environmental criterion.
Selenium All NDs
Organic Compounds
Dieldrin All NDs
MREs or ADREs for the remaining POCs are listed below:
Pollutant of Concern Comments from Data Set Removal
Efficiency Method
Conventional
Oil and Grease 53.17% MRE
Turbidity (NTU) 94.81% MRE
Settleable Solids (mL/L) 99.60% MRE
Ammonia Nitrogen total
(as N) 56.56% MRE
Priority Pollutants Metals
Arsenic
Negative removal efficiencies were removed for
calculation of ADRE 15.52% ADRE
Cadmium 51.48% MRE
Total Chromium 9.17% ADRE
Copper
Negative removal efficiencies were removed for
calculation of ADRE. 28.17% ADRE
Molybdenum
Negative removal efficiencies were removed for
calculation of ADRE. 16.69% ADRE
Nickel
Negative removal efficiencies were removed for
calculation of ADRE. 7.56% ADRE
Silver
Negative removal efficiencies were removed for
calculation of ADRE. 12% ADRE
Zinc 63% MRE
Organic Compounds
bis(2-ethylhexyl
phthalate) 63% MRE
City of Crescent City 12 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
7.2 Calculating Allowable Headworks Loading
Allowable Headworks Loading (AHL) is the estimated maximum loading of a pollutant that can be received at a POTW’s headworks that should not cause a POTW to violate a particular treatment plant or environmental criterion. AHLs are developed to prevent interference or pass through.
After collecting and evaluating the necessary data, Crescent City calculated AHLs for each POC based on its treatment efficiency and on environmental criteria for pass through and interference. AHLs were calculated for each applicable criterion including:
• Effluent based criteria (NPDES ORDER NO. R1-2017-0002); • Resource Protection Criteria (California Ocean Plan, 2019, State Water Board); • Sludge based criteria (40 CFR Part 503).
The Crescent City has had no past inhibition problems at the WWTF. The City did not calculate AHLs to protect against inhibition because historic/current loadings have been acceptable to the treatment work’s biological processes, and published inhibition factors for the processes in the WWTF are not available.
The following formulas were used to calculate AHLs:
City of Crescent City 13 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
7.3 Designation of Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading
Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading (MAHL) is the estimated maximum loading of a pollutant that can be received at a POTW’s headworks without causing pass through or interference. MAHLs are the most protective (lowest) of the AHLs (see definition) estimated for a pollutant. The table below contains the MAHLs for the POCs and criteria:
7.4 Calculation of Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAIL) is the estimated maximum loading of a pollutant that can be received at a POTW’s headworks from all industrial users and other controlled sources without causing pass through or interference. The MAIL was calculated by applying a 10% safety/growth factor to the MAHL and discounting for uncontrolled sources.
The formula for calculating MAIL is included below:
City of Crescent City 14 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services The table below contains the calculated MAILs for the POCs:
Yellow highlighted rows indicate pollutants with negative MAILs. This occurs when the domestic / commercial loading exceeds the MAHL and safety factor creating a deficit in the MAIL.
City of Crescent City 15 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
8.0 DESIGNATING AND IMPLEMENTING LOCAL LIMITS
EPA recommends that local limits are needed when average influent loading of a toxic pollutant exceeds 60 percent of the MAHL.
8.1 Actual Loadings vs. MAHL
The formula below is used for calculating the percentage of MAHL being received at the POTW:
The above equation has been used to calculate current loading as a percent of MAHL as shown in the table below:
City of Crescent City 16 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services Yellow highlighted rows indicate pollutants with current loading greater than 60% of the MAHL.
EPA recommends that local limits are needed when the average influent loading of a toxic pollutant exceeds 60 percent of the MAHL (EPA, 2004).
The average actual loading of five pollutants exceed 60% of the MAHL, including oil and grease, ammonia nitrogen total, chromium total, copper, and silver.
There are existing local limits for oil and grease, ammonia nitrogen total, and copper.
These limits were evaluated considering the new information contained in this study.
New local limits for total chromium and silver appears to be appropriate.
8.2 Ammonia Nitrogen Total
Crescent City has a local limit for ammonia nitrogen total set at 32 mg/l. The existing local limit was established in the 2012 Local Limits Study, (FES, 2012). The 2012 modeling indicated that loading at the time exceeded the MAHL and set the local limit at the average influent concentration for ammonia (32 mg/l).
The current study found that the average influent concentration of ammonia nitrogen total was 30 mg/l, and at 84% of the modeled maximum allowable headworks loading (MAHL).
It is recommended that City maintain the existing local limit of 32 mg/l.
8.3 Oil and Grease
Crescent City has a local limit for oil and grease set at 100 mg/l. According to the 2012 local limits study (FES, 2012);
“Zero discharge of Oil and Grease is not practical however, so the local limit for Oil and Grease must be based on what is achievable with reasonable controls.
According to EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance (EPA, 2004), an Oil and Grease limit of 100 mg/L is achievable with the application of best management practices or generally available pretreatment (e.g., grease interceptors).
The current study found that the average influent concentration of oil and grease was 72 mg/l, and at 184% of the modeled maximum allowable headworks loading (MAHL).
Since the current loading exceeds the modeled MAHL for oil and grease it is recommended that City maintain the existing local limit of 100 mg/l.
8.4 Chromium Total
Crescent City does not have a local limit for chromium total.
According to (FES, 2012) average influent concentration of total chromium was 0.002 mg/l, and at 7% of the modeled maximum allowable headworks loading (MAHL).
City of Crescent City 17 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services The current study found the average influent concentration of chromium total 0.089 mg/l, and at 148% of the modeled maximum allowable headworks loading (MAHL).
Since the current loading exceeds the modeled MAHL for chromium total it is recommended that City implement a new local limit of 0.10 mg/l (approximate average influent concentration plus 20%).
8.5 Copper
Crescent City has a local limit for copper set at 0.086 mg/l. According to (FES, 2012); “the Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading methodology results in uniform concentrations (local limits) of zero for copper and ammonia. Limiting these pollutants to zero discharge is not practical because these pollutants are either a normal component of domestic wastewater, prevalent in the City’s water supply, or not achievable with reasonable controls. Adjustments to local limits for each of these pollutants was made setting the limit to the average influent concentration” The current study found that the average influent concentration of copper was 0.087 mg/l, and at 227% of the modeled maximum allowable headworks loading (MAHL).
Since the current loading exceeds the modeled MAHL for copper it is recommended that City maintain the existing local limit of 0.086 mg/l.
8.6 Silver
Crescent City does not have a local limit for silver.
According to (FES, 2012) average influent concentration of silver was 0.00044 mg/l, and at 28.1% of the modeled maximum allowable headworks loading (MAHL).
The current study found the average influent concentration of silver total 0.070 mg/l, and at 427% of the modeled maximum allowable headworks loading (MAHL).
Since the current loading exceeds the modeled MAHL for silver total it is recommended that the City implement a new local limit of 0.084 mg/l (approximate average influent concentration plus 20%).
8.7 Proposed Local Limits
The City has decided to allocate MAILs uniformly among all IUs and place uniform concentration limits in the local SUO/resolution for four POCs. Changes to existing local limits and new local limits are proposed below:
City of Crescent City 18 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services In EPA’s view, a POTW should not use current loading as a percent of MAHL in deciding whether to continue to control a particular pollutant by a local limit because the enforcement of the local limit may be the reason that the pollutant loading has been reduced or is no longer causing problems. If the local limit were removed, industrial users (IUs) may discontinue their use of wastewater pretreatment and POTW loadings may increase above the threshold in the criteria (EPA, 2004).
There are only three SIUs with discharge permits being monitored. There are no IUs implementing pretreatment for the pollutants being proposed for local limit elimination and an increase in loading of Lead, Nickel, bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, and zinc are not likely nor anticipated. These constituents are not used in the manufacture of beer or cheese.
The final list of proposed local limits is contained in the table below:
The narrative limit for “"Petroleum oil, nonbiodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin” is proposed to be eliminated since it is covered by an existing numeric local Iimit.
City of Crescent City 19 July 2020
Technically Based Local Limit Study Freshwater Environmental Services
9.0 REFERENCES
Freshwater Environmental Services, 2012, Crescent City Technical Basis for Wastewater Limits: January
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2004, Local Limits Development Guide:
July.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1975, Treatability of Oil and Grease Discharged to Publicly Owned Treatment Works: April.
Appendix A
LABORATORY RESULTS
Analyte Sample Name Sampe Date Qualifer Result Units
Oil & Grease CS #1-Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19 32.6 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #1-Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19 54.6 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #1-Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19 93 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #1-Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19 54.4 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #1-Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19 92.2 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #1-Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19 143 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #1-Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19 52.9 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #2-Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19 54.2 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #2-Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19 54.2 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #2-Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19 278 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #2-Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19 109 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #2-Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19 45.7 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #2-Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19 125 mg/L
Oil & Grease CS #2-Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19 189 mg/L
Oil & Grease Efff-Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19 93.5 mg/L
Oil & Grease Efff-Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19 ND 0.9 mg/L
Oil & Grease Efff-Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19 21.3 mg/L
Oil & Grease Efff-Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19 26.1 mg/L
Oil & Grease Efff-Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19 30 mg/L
Oil & Grease Efff-Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19 36.4 mg/L
Oil & Grease Efff-Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19 27.8 mg/L
Oil & Grease Inf Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19 27.8 mg/L
Oil & Grease Inf Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19 88 mg/L
Oil & Grease Inf Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19 45.2 mg/L
Oil & Grease Inf Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19 170 mg/L
Oil & Grease Inf Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19 ND 0.9 mg/L
Oil & Grease Inf Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19 68 mg/L
Oil & Grease Inf Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19 104 mg/L
Turbidity CS#1- Tractor Supply 05-Sep-19 160 NTU
Turbidity CS#1- Tractor Supply 06-Sep-19 190 NTU
Turbidity CS#1- Tractor Supply 07-Sep-19 NDA 0 NTU
Turbidity CS#1- Tractor Supply 08-Sep-19 160 NTU
Turbidity CS#1- Tractor Supply 09-Sep-19 150 NTU
Turbidity CS#1- Tractor Supply 10-Sep-19 280 NTU
Turbidity CS#1- Tractor Supply 11-Sep-19 170 NTU
Turbidity CS#2 Perlitas 05-Sep-19 170 NTU
Turbidity CS#2 Perlitas 06-Sep-19 NDA 0 NTU
Turbidity CS#2 Perlitas 07-Sep-19 400 NTU
Turbidity CS#2 Perlitas 08-Sep-19 650 NTU
Turbidity CS#2 Perlitas 09-Sep-19 750 NTU
Turbidity CS#2 Perlitas 10-Sep-19 550 NTU
Turbidity CS#2 Perlitas 11-Sep-19 450 NTU
Turbidity EFF-001: Effluent 05-Sep-19 8.7 NTU
Turbidity EFF-001: Effluent 06-Sep-19 9.6 NTU
Turbidity EFF-001: Effluent 07-Sep-19 9.2 NTU
Turbidity EFF-001: Effluent 08-Sep-19 8.1 NTU
Turbidity EFF-001: Effluent 09-Sep-19 9.4 NTU
Turbidity EFF-001: Effluent 10-Sep-19 9.2 NTU
Turbidity EFF-001: Effluent 11-Sep-19 8.6 NTU
Turbidity INF-001: WWTP Influent 05-Sep-19 260 NTU
Turbidity INF-001: WWTP Influent 06-Sep-19 120 NTU
Turbidity INF-001: WWTP Influent 07-Sep-19 190 NTU
Turbidity INF-001: WWTP Influent 08-Sep-19 140 NTU
Turbidity INF-001: WWTP Influent 09-Sep-19 200 NTU
Turbidity INF-001: WWTP Influent 10-Sep-19 140 NTU
Turbidity INF-001: WWTP Influent 11-Sep-19 160 NTU
Settleable Solids CS#1- Tractor Supply 05-Sep-19 24 mL / L Settleable Solids CS#1- Tractor Supply 06-Sep-19 37 mL / L Settleable Solids CS#1- Tractor Supply 07-Sep-19 NDA 0 mL / L Settleable Solids CS#1- Tractor Supply 08-Sep-19 15 mL / L Settleable Solids CS#1- Tractor Supply 09-Sep-19 15 mL / L Settleable Solids CS#1- Tractor Supply 10-Sep-19 45 mL / L Settleable Solids CS#1- Tractor Supply 11-Sep-19 19 mL / L Settleable Solids CS#2 Perlitas 05-Sep-19 30 mL / L
Settleable Solids CS#2 Perlitas 06-Sep-19 NDA 0 mL / L
Settleable Solids CS#2 Perlitas 07-Sep-19 34 mL / L
Settleable Solids CS#2 Perlitas 08-Sep-19 31 mL / L
Settleable Solids CS#2 Perlitas 09-Sep-19 60 mL / L
Settleable Solids CS#2 Perlitas 10-Sep-19 31 mL / L
Settleable Solids CS#2 Perlitas 11-Sep-19 35 mL / L
Settleable Solids EFF-001: Effluent 05-Sep-19 0.1 mL / L Settleable Solids EFF-001: Effluent 06-Sep-19 ND 0.1 mL / L Settleable Solids EFF-001: Effluent 07-Sep-19 0.2 mL / L Settleable Solids EFF-001: Effluent 08-Sep-19 ND 0.1 mL / L Settleable Solids EFF-001: Effluent 09-Sep-19 0.2 mL / L Settleable Solids EFF-001: Effluent 10-Sep-19 ND 0.1 mL / L Settleable Solids EFF-001: Effluent 11-Sep-19 ND 0.1 mL / L Settleable Solids INF-001: WWTP Influent 05-Sep-19 29 mL / L Settleable Solids INF-001: WWTP Influent 06-Sep-19 35 mL / L Settleable Solids INF-001: WWTP Influent 07-Sep-19 34 mL / L Settleable Solids INF-001: WWTP Influent 08-Sep-19 28 mL / L Settleable Solids INF-001: WWTP Influent 09-Sep-19 32 mL / L Settleable Solids INF-001: WWTP Influent 10-Sep-19 34 mL / L Settleable Solids INF-001: WWTP Influent 11-Sep-19 34 mL / L Ammonia- N CS#1- Tractor Supply 05-Sep-19 43.5 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N CS#1- Tractor Supply 06-Sep-19 44 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N CS#1- Tractor Supply 07-Sep-19 NDA 0 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N CS#1- Tractor Supply 08-Sep-19 43.3 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N CS#1- Tractor Supply 09-Sep-19 42.5 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N CS#1- Tractor Supply 10-Sep-19 49.1 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N CS#1- Tractor Supply 11-Sep-19 42.4 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N CS#2 Perlitas 05-Sep-19 36.9 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N CS#2 Perlitas 06-Sep-19 NDA0 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N CS#2 Perlitas 07-Sep-19 38.2 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N CS#2 Perlitas 08-Sep-19 38.2 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N CS#2 Perlitas 09-Sep-19 33.8 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N CS#2 Perlitas 10-Sep-19 40 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N CS#2 Perlitas 11-Sep-19 35.3 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N EFF-001: Effluent 05-Sep-19 15.2 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N EFF-001: Effluent 06-Sep-19 10.7 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N EFF-001: Effluent 07-Sep-19 11.2 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N EFF-001: Effluent 08-Sep-19 13.5 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N EFF-001: Effluent 09-Sep-19 12.3 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N EFF-001: Effluent 10-Sep-19 14.6 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N EFF-001: Effluent 11-Sep-19 11.5 mg/L NH3-N
Ammonia- N INF-001: WWTP Influent 05-Sep-19 29 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N INF-001: WWTP Influent 06-Sep-19 30.6 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N INF-001: WWTP Influent 07-Sep-19 27.1 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N INF-001: WWTP Influent 08-Sep-19 30.9 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N INF-001: WWTP Influent 09-Sep-19 31.8 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N INF-001: WWTP Influent 10-Sep-19 27.4 mg/L NH3-N Ammonia- N INF-001: WWTP Influent 11-Sep-19 28.1 mg/L NH3-N Arsenic CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 1.7 ug/L
Arsenic CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 4.1 ug/L
Arsenic CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 1.7 ug/L
Arsenic CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 1.7 ug/L
Arsenic CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 92.5 ug/L
Arsenic CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 60.7 ug/L
Arsenic CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 90.4 ug/L
Arsenic CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 1.7 ug/L
Arsenic CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 1.7 ug/L
Arsenic CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 41.4 ug/L
Arsenic CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 83.5 ug/L
Arsenic CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 82.6 ug/L
Arsenic CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 154 ug/L
Arsenic Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 1.7 ug/L
Arsenic Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 38.7 ug/L
Arsenic Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 1.7 ug/L
Arsenic Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 78.2 ug/L
Arsenic Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 62.3 ug/L
Arsenic Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 82.6 ug/L
Arsenic Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 77.9 ug/L
Arsenic Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 1.7 ug/L
Arsenic Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 29.7 ug/L
Arsenic Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 1.7 ug/L
Arsenic Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 39.1 ug/L
Arsenic Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 78.2 ug/L
Arsenic Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 92.5 ug/L
Arsenic Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 19.1 ug/L
Arsenic Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 ND 0.47 mg/kg dry Arsenic Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 ND 0.5 mg/kg dry Cadmium CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.08 ug/L
Cadmium CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 3.83 ug/L
Cadmium CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.08 ug/L
Cadmium CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.08 ug/L
Cadmium CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 18.3 ug/L
Cadmium CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 12.3 ug/L
Cadmium CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 14.2 ug/L
Cadmium CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 0.34 ug/L
Cadmium CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.08 ug/L
Cadmium CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 2.71 ug/L
Cadmium CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 18.4 ug/L
Cadmium CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 15.5 ug/L
Cadmium CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 24.7 ug/L
Cadmium Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.08 ug/L
Cadmium Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 10.3 ug/L
Cadmium Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.08 ug/L
Cadmium Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 12.3 ug/L
Cadmium Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 12.6 ug/L
Cadmium Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 15.5 ug/L
Cadmium Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 11.3 ug/L
Cadmium Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.08 ug/L
Cadmium Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 7.35 ug/L
Cadmium Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.08 ug/L
Cadmium Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 6.15 ug/L
Cadmium Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 17.2 ug/L
Cadmium Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 18.3 ug/L
Cadmium Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 5.82 ug/L
Cadmium Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 0.92 mg/kg dry
Cadmium Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 0.62 mg/kg dry
Chromium CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.082 ug/L
Chromium CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 46 ug/L
Chromium CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 4.74 ug/L
Chromium CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.082 ug/L
Chromium CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 189 ug/L
Chromium CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 136 ug/L
Chromium CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 172 ug/L
Chromium CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 0.5 ug/L
Chromium CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.082 ug/L
Chromium CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 48.3 ug/L
Chromium CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 197 ug/L
Chromium CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 172 ug/L
Chromium CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 281 ug/L
Chromium Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.082 ug/L
Chromium Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 106 ug/L
Chromium Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.082 ug/L
Chromium Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 142 ug/L
Chromium Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 141 ug/L
Chromium Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 172 ug/L
Chromium Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 151 ug/L
Chromium Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.082 ug/L
Chromium Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 77.9 ug/L
Chromium Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.082 ug/L
Chromium Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 79 ug/L
Chromium Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 195 ug/L
Chromium Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 189 ug/L
Chromium Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 78.3 ug/L
Chromium Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 32.3 mg/kg dry
Chromium Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 29.7 mg/kg dry
Copper CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 0.21 ug/L
Copper CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 65.4 ug/L
Copper CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 116 ug/L
Copper CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.05 ug/L
Copper CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 162 ug/L
Copper CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 131 ug/L
Copper CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 128 ug/L
Copper CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 48.1 ug/L
Copper CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 49.9 ug/L
Copper CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 41.9 ug/L
Copper CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 153 ug/L
Copper CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 181 ug/L
Copper CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 228 ug/L
Copper Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.05 ug/L
Copper Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 1080 ug/L
Copper Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 6.02 ug/L
Copper Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 88.4 ug/L
Copper Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 100 ug/L
Copper Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 181 ug/L
Copper Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 99.7 ug/L
Copper Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.05 ug/L
Copper Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 88.1 ug/L
Copper Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.05 ug/L
Copper Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 67.4 ug/L
Copper Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 229 ug/L
Copper Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 162 ug/L
Copper Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 67.7 ug/L
Copper Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 288 mg/kg dry
Copper Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 282 mg/kg dry
Cyanide, Total CS #1-Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #1-Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #1-Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #1-Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #1-Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19 ND 0.002 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #1-Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #1-Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19J 0.004 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #2-Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #2-Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19J 0.004 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #2-Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19 ND 0.002 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #2-Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #2-Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #2-Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total CS #2-Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19J 0.004 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Efff-Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Efff-Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Efff-Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19J 0.004 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Efff-Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Efff-Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Efff-Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Efff-Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19J 0.004 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Inf-Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Inf-Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Inf-Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Inf-Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Inf-Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19J 0.004 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Inf-Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19J 0.003 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Inf-Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19J 0.004 mg/L
Cyanide, Total Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 1.39 mg/kg dry Cyanide, Total Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 0.24 mg/kg dry Lead CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 0.018 mg/L
Lead CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 3E-04 mg/L
Lead Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 ND 0.47 mg/kg dry
Lead Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 ND 0.5 mg/kg dry
Molybdenum CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 16.2 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 24.8 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.4 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.4 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 126 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 90.5 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 119 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.4 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.4 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 40.9 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 125 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 112 ug/L
Molybdenum CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 199 ug/L
Molybdenum Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.4 ug/L
Molybdenum Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 59.3 ug/L
Molybdenum Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.4 ug/L
Molybdenum Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 93.9 ug/L
Molybdenum Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 78.5 ug/L
Molybdenum Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 112 ug/L
Molybdenum Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 92.1 ug/L
Molybdenum Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.4 ug/L
Molybdenum Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 36.8 ug/L
Molybdenum Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.4 ug/L
Molybdenum Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 62 ug/L
Molybdenum Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 101 ug/L
Molybdenum Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 126 ug/L
Molybdenum Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 41.7 ug/L
Molybdenum Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 ND 0.47 mg/kg dry Molybdenum Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 ND 0.5 mg/kg dry Mercury CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 1E-04 ug/L
Mercury Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 0.977 ug/L
Mercury Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 ND 0.2 mg/kg dry Mercury Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 ND 0.2 mg/kg dry Nickel CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.6 ug/L
Nickel CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 29.7 ug/L
Nickel CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 14 ug/L
Nickel CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.6 ug/L
Nickel CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 128 ug/L
Nickel CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 95.8 ug/L
Nickel CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 94.6 ug/L
Nickel CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 4.47 ug/L
Nickel CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.6 ug/L
Nickel CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 26.8 ug/L
Nickel CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 125 ug/L
Nickel CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 116 ug/L
Nickel CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 169 ug/L
Nickel Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.6 ug/L
Nickel Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 68.9 ug/L
Nickel Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.6 ug/L
Nickel Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 78 ug/L
Nickel Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 93.1 ug/L
Nickel Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 116 ug/L
Nickel Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 85.8 ug/L
Nickel Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.6 ug/L
Nickel Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 48.2 ug/L
Nickel Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.6 ug/L
Nickel Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 47.8 ug/L
Nickel Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 112 ug/L
Nickel Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 128 ug/L
Nickel Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 41.4 ug/L
Nickel Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 22.8 mg/kg dry
Nickel Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 22.6 mg/kg dry
Sulfate CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 14 mg/L
Sulfate CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 16.2 mg/L
Sulfate CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 17.2 mg/L
Sulfate CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 15.4 mg/L
Sulfate CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 13.9 mg/L
Sulfate CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 14 mg/L
Sulfate CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 10.7 mg/L
Sulfate CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 29.2 mg/L
Sulfate CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 22.5 mg/L
Sulfate CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 0.69 mg/L
Sulfate CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 21.5 mg/L
Sulfate CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 25.4 mg/L
Sulfate CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 33.8 mg/L
Sulfate Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 31.3 mg/L
Sulfate Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 31.8 mg/L
Sulfate Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 30.7 mg/L
Sulfate Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 33.1 mg/L
Sulfate Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 30.5 mg/L
Sulfate Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 27.4 mg/L
Sulfate Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 29.3 mg/L
Sulfate Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 14.2 mg/L
Sulfate Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 15.4 mg/L
Sulfate Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 15.6 mg/L
Sulfate Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 0.49 mg/L
Sulfate Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 16.3 mg/L
Sulfate Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 16.5 mg/L
Sulfate Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 15.9 mg/L
Sulfide CS #1-Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19 0.75 mg/L
Sulfide CS #1-Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19 0.38 mg/L
Sulfide CS #1-Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19 0.52 mg/L
Sulfide CS #1-Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19 0.5 mg/L
Sulfide CS #1-Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19 0.39 mg/L
Sulfide CS #1-Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19 0.48 mg/L
Sulfide CS #1-Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19 0.42 mg/L
Sulfide CS #2-Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19 0.8 mg/L
Sulfide CS #2-Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19 0.8 mg/L
Sulfide CS #2-Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19 0.8 mg/L
Sulfide CS #2-Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19 1.25 mg/L
Sulfide CS #2-Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19 0.74 mg/L
Sulfide CS #2-Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19 0.39 mg/L
Sulfide CS #2-Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19 0.56 mg/L
Sulfide Efff-Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19J 0.02 mg/L
Sulfide Efff-Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19 ND 0.01 mg/L
Sulfide Efff-Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19 ND 0.01 mg/L
Sulfide Efff-Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19J 0.02 mg/L
Sulfide Efff-Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19J 0.02 mg/L
Sulfide Efff-Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19J 0.02 mg/L
Sulfide Efff-Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19J 0.02 mg/L
Sulfide Inf Comp-GRAB 05-Sep-19 0.55 mg/L
Sulfide Inf Comp-GRAB 06-Sep-19 0.39 mg/L
Sulfide Inf Comp-GRAB 07-Sep-19 0.29 mg/L
Sulfide Inf Comp-GRAB 08-Sep-19 0.37 mg/L
Sulfide Inf Comp-GRAB 09-Sep-19 0.35 mg/L
Sulfide Inf Comp-GRAB 10-Sep-19 0.3 mg/L
Sulfide Inf Comp-GRAB 11-Sep-19 0.28 mg/L
Selenium CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 0.12 ug/L
Selenium Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 ND 0.47 mg/kg dry Selenium Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 ND 0.5 mg/kg dry Silver CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.095 ug/L
Silver CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 136 ug/L
Silver CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 116 ug/L
Silver CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.095 ug/L
Silver CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.095 ug/L
Silver CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 163 ug/L
Silver CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 42 ug/L
Silver CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 219 ug/L
Silver CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 169 ug/L
Silver CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 139 ug/L
Silver CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.095 ug/L
Silver CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 30.2 ug/L
Silver CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.095 ug/L
Silver Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 62.9 ug/L
Silver Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.095 ug/L
Silver Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.095 ug/L
Silver Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 139 ug/L
Silver Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 124 ug/L
Silver Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 105 ug/L
Silver Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 120 ug/L
Silver Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.095 ug/L
Silver Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 144 ug/L
Silver Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 67.8 ug/L
Silver Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.095 ug/L
Silver Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 52.1 ug/L
Silver Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 64.2 ug/L
Silver Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 163 ug/L
Silver Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 ND 0.24 mg/kg dry Silver Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 ND 0.25 mg/kg dry Zinc CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 8440 ug/L
Zinc CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 131 ug/L
Zinc CS #1-Comp 07-Sep-19 507 ug/L
Zinc CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 87.9 ug/L
Zinc CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 131 ug/L
Zinc CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 168 ug/L
Zinc CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 98.5 ug/L
Zinc CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 196 ug/L
Zinc CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 172 ug/L
Zinc CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 43.3 ug/L
Zinc CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 108 ug/L
Zinc CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 311 ug/L
Zinc CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 299 ug/L
Zinc Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 25.9 ug/L
Zinc Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 64.4 ug/L
Zinc Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 56.9 ug/L
Zinc Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 69.8 ug/L
Zinc Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 63.5 ug/L
Zinc Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 311 ug/L
Zinc Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 52.9 ug/L
Zinc Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 276 ug/L
Zinc Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 346 ug/L
Zinc Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 279 ug/L
Zinc Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 170 ug/L
Zinc Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 124 ug/L
Zinc Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 131 ug/L
Zinc Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 396 ug/L
Zinc Press Cake Comp-Grab 04-Sep-19 828 mg/kg dry
Zinc Press Cake Comp-Grab 07-Sep-19 813 mg/kg dry
Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 7.7 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 9.6 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 15.6 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 J 3.3 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 J 1.1 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 6.8 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 J 1.2 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 J 3.1 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.7 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 J 4.7 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 15.1 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 6.4 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 J 1.2 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 5.4 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 J 0.8 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 J 1.8 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 0.7 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 0.8 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 7.7 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 11.4 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 0.8 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 7 ug/L
Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 J 8.8 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 18 ug/L
Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 J 0.9 ug/L Bis (2-ethylhexy) Phthalate Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 J 2.4 ug/L Dieldrin CS #1-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin CS #1-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin CS #1-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin CS #1-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin CS #1-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin CS #1-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin CS #2-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin CS #2-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin CS #2-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin CS #2-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin CS #2-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin CS #2-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Eff-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Eff-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Eff-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Eff-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Eff-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Eff-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Eff-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Inf-Comp 05-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Inf-Comp 06-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Inf-Comp 07-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Inf-Comp 08-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Inf-Comp 09-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Inf-Comp 10-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Dieldrin Inf-Comp 11-Sep-19 ND 0.001 ug/L
Appendix B
EPA Region 5 MAHL Spreadsheet
Local Limits Determination Based on NPDES Daily Effluent Limits
ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND PROCESS DATA BASE MAXIMUM LOADING INDUSTRIAL IU Pollut. POTW Removal NPDES Domestic and Commercial Allowable Domestic/ Allowable Local Safety Pollutant Flow Flow Efficiency Daily Limit Conc. Flow Headworks Commercial Loading Limit Factor (MGD) (MGD) (%) (mg/l) (mg/l) (MGD) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (mg/l) (%) (Qind) (Qpotw) (Rpotw) (Ccrit) (Cdom) (Qdom) (Lhw) (Ldom) (Lind) (Cind) (SF) Oil and Grease 0.048 1.3140 53.2 75 98.4 1.266 1755 1039 541 1350 10 Turbidity (NTU) 0.048 1.3140 94.8 291.4 1.266 - 3077 - - 10 Settleable Solids
(mL/L) 0.048 1.3140 99.6 26.9 1.266 - 284 - - 10
Ammonia Nitrogen
total (as N) 0.048 1.3140 56.6 72 34.8 1.266 1816 367 1267 3166 10 Arsenic 0.048 1.3140 15.52 0.0485 1.266 - 0.51208434 - - 10 Cadmium 0.048 1.3140 51.48 0.0086 1.266 - 0.090802584 - - 10 Chromium 0.048 1.3140 9.17 0.0974 1.266 - 1.028392056 - - 10 0 - 0 - - 10
Copper 0.048 1.3140 28.17 0.3 0.1015 1.266 4.58 1.07168166 3.047579373 7.61285815 10 Cyanide 0.048 1.3140 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
0 - 0 - - 10
Lead 0.048 1.3140 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Mercury 0.048 1.3140 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Molybdenum 0.048 1.3140 16.69 0.0668 1.266 - 0.705303792 - - 10 Nickel 0.048 1.3140 7.56 0.6 0.0628 1.266 7.11 0.663070032 5.7386288 14.3351039 10 Selenium 0.048 1.3140 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Silver 0.048 1.3140 12 0.0791 1.266 - 0.835172604 - - 10 Zinc 0.048 1.3140 63 0.777 1.266 - 8.20390788 - - 10
bis(2-ethylhexl phthalate) 0.048 1.3140 63 0.00627 1.266 - 0.066201419 - - 10 Dielden 0.048 1.3140 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
(Qind) Industrial User total plant discharge flow in Million Gallons per Day (MGD) that contains a particular pollutant. (Qpotw) POTW's average influent flow in MGD.
(Rpotw) Removal efficiency across POTW as percent.
(Ccrit) NPDES daily maximum permit limit for a particular pollutant in mg/l. (Qdom) Domestic/commercial background flow in MGD.
(Cdom) Domestic/commercial background concentration for a particular pollutant in mg/l. (Lhw) Maximum allowable headworks pollutant loading to the POTW in pounds per day (lbs/day). (Ldom) Domestic/commercial background loading to the POTW for a particular pollutant in pounds per day (lbs/day). (Lind) Maximum allowable industrial loading to the POTW in pounds per day. (Cind) Industrial allowable local limit for a given pollutant in mg/l. (SF) Safety factor as a percent.
8.34 Unit conversion factor
Lhw = 8.34 * Ccrit * Qpotw
1 - Rpotw
::
TABLE 2
Local Limits Determination Based on NPDES Monthly Effluent Limits
ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND PROCESS DATA BASE MAXIMUM LOADING INDUSTRIAL IU Pollut. POTW Removal NPDES Domestic and Commercial Allowable Domestic/ Allowable Local Safety Pollutant Flow Flow Efficiency
Monthly Limit or
6-month Limit Conc. Flow Headworks Commercial Loading Limit Factor (MGD) (MGD) (%) (mg/l) (mg/l) (MGD) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (mg/l) (%) (Qind) (Qpotw) (Rpotw) (Ccrit) (Cdom) (Qdom) (Lhw) (Ldom) (Lind) (Cind) (SF) Oil and Grease 0.048 1.3140 53.17 25 98.4 1.266 585 1039 -512 -1280 10 Turbidity (NTU) 0.048 1.3140 94.81 75 291.4 1.266 15836 3077 11176 27918 10 Settleable Solids
(mL/L) 0.048 1.3140 99.6 1 26.9 1.266 2740 284 2182 5450 10 Ammonia Nitrogen
total (as N) 0.048 1.3140 56.56 18 34.8 1.266 454 367 41 103 10 Arsenic 0.048 1.314 15.52 0.0485 1.266 - 0.51208434 - - 10 Cadmium 0.048 1.314 51.48 0.0086 1.266 - 0.090802584 - - 10 Chromium 0.048 1.314 9.17 0.0974 1.266 - 1.028392056 - - 10 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 - - 10
Copper 0.048 1.314 28.17 0.032 0.1015 1.266 0.49 1.07168166 -0.632293816 -1.579471 10 Cyanide 0.048 1.314 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
0 0 0 0 0 - 0 - - 10
Lead 0.048 1.314 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Mercury 0.048 1.314 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Molybdenum 0.048 1.314 16.69 0.0668 1.266 - 0.705303792 - - 10 Nickel 0.048 1.314 7.56 0.15 0.0628 1.266 1.778249675 0.663070032 0.937354676 2.34151348 10 Selenium 0.048 1.314 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Silver 0.048 1.314 12 0.0791 1.266 - 0.835172604 - - 10 Zinc 0.048 1.314 63 0.777 1.266 - 8.20390788 - - 10
bis(2-ethylhexl phthalate) 0.048 1.314 63
Dielden 0.048 1.314 0
(Qind) Industrial User total plant discharge flow in Million Gallons per Day (MGD) that contains a particular pollutant. (Qpotw) POTW's average influent flow in MGD.
(Rpotw) Removal efficiency across POTW as percent.
(Ccrit) NPDES monthly maximum permit limit for a particular pollutant in mg/l. (Qdom) Domestic/commercial background flow in MGD.
(Cdom) Domestic/commercial background concentration for a particular pollutant in mg/l. (Lhw) Maximum allowable headworks pollutant loading to the POTW in pounds per day (lbs/day). (Ldom) Domestic/commercial background loading to the POTW for a particular pollutant in pounds per day (lbs/day). (Lind) Maximum allowable industrial loading to the POTW in pounds per day. (Cind) Industrial allowable local limit for a given pollutant in mg/l. (SF) Safety factor as a percent.
8.34 Unit conversion factor
Lhw = 8.34 * Ccrit * Qpotw
1 - Rpotw
::
Local Limits Determination Based on USEPA 503 Sludge Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND PROCESS DATA BASE MAXIMUM LOADING INDUSTRIAL IU Pollut. POTW Sludge Percent Removal 503 Sludge Domestic and Commercial Allowable Domestic/ Allowable Local Safety Pollutant Flow Flow Flow Solids Efficiency Criteria Conc. Flow Headworks Commercial Loading Limit Factor (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (%) (%) (mg/kg) (mg/l) (MGD) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (mg/l) (%) (Qind) (Qpotw) (Qsldg) (PS) (Rpotw) (Cslcrit) (Cdom) (Qdom) (Lhw) (Ldom) (Lind) (Cind) (SF) Arsenic 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 15.52 75 0.0485 1.266 143.80 0.51 128.90838 322.01 10 Cadmium 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 51.48 85 0.0086 1.266 49.13 0.09 44.128694 110.23 10 Chromium 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 9.17 0.0974 1.266 - 1.03 - - 10 Copper 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 28.17 4300 0.1015 1.266 4542.27 1.07 4086.9672 10209.25 10 Cyanide 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Lead 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 0 840 0 1.266 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 10 Mercury 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 0 57 0 1.266 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 10 Molybdenum 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 16.69 75 0.0668 1.266 133.72 0.71 119.64255 298.87 10 Nickel 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 7.56 420 0.0628 1.266 1653.17 0.66 1487.1929 3715.01 10 Selenium 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 0 100 0 1.266 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 10 Silver 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 12 0.0791 1.266 - 0.84 - - 10 Zinc 0.048 1.314 0.223 16 63 7500 0.777 1.266 3542.51 8.20 3180.0589 7943.792339 10 (Qind) Industrial User total plant discharge flow in Million Gallons per Day (MGD) that contains a particular pollutant. (Qpotw) POTW's average influent flow in MGD.
(Qsldg) Sludge flow to disposal in MGD.
(PS) Percent solids of sludge to disposal.
(Rpotw) Removal efficiency across POTW as a percent.
(Cslcrit) 503 sludge criteria in mg/kg dry sludge.
(Qdom) Domestic/commercial background flow in MGD.
(Cdom) Domestic/commercial background concentration for a particular pollutant in mg/l. (Lhw) Maximum allowable headworks pollutant loading to the POTW in pounds per day (lbs/day). (Ldom) Domestic/commercial background loading to the POTW for a particular pollutant in pounds per day (lbs/day). (Lind) Maximum allowable industrial loading to the POTW in pounds per day. (Cind) Industrial allowable local limit for a given pollutant in mg/l. (SF) Safety factor as a percent.
8.34 Unit conversion factor
Lhw = 8.34 * Cslcrit * (PS/100) * Qsldg
Local Limits Determination Based on Chronic Water Quality Standards
ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND PROCESS DATA BASE MAXIMUM LOADING INDUSTRIAL IU Pollut. POTW Upstream Upstream Removal Chronic Domestic and Commercial Allowable Domestic/ Allowable Local Safety Pollutant Flow Flow Flow Conc. Efficiency WQS Conc. Flow Headworks Commercial Loading Limit Factor (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (mg/l) (%) (mg/l) (mg/l) (MGD) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (mg/l) (%) (Qind) (Qpotw) (Qstr) (Cstr) (Rpotw) (Ccrit) (Cdom) (Qdom) (Lhw) (Ldom) (Lind) (Cind) (SF) Ammonia Nitrogen
total (as N) 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 56.56 0.6 34.8 1.266 454.09 367.43 41.25 103.04 10 Arsenic 0.048 1.314 38.106 0.003 15.52 0.008 0.0485 1.266 1.98 0.5120843 1.2741624 3.18285973 10 Cadmium 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 51.48 0.001 0.0086 1.266 0.68 0.0908026 0.5190212 1.29651589 10 Chromium 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 9.17 0.002 0.0974 1.266 0.72 1.0283921 -0.3768749 -0.94143408 10 Hex. Chrom. 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0 0 0.00 0 0 #DIV/0! 10
Copper 0.048 1.314 38.106 0.002 28.17 0.003 0.1015 1.266 0.49 1.0716817 -0.6322938 -1.57947096 10 Cyanide 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 - - 10
Lead 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Mercury 0.048 1.314 38.106 0.0000005 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10 Molybdenum 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 16.69 0.0668 1.266 - 0.7053038 - - 10 Nickel 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 7.56 0.005 0.0628 1.266 1.78 0.66307 0.9373547 2.341513479 10 Selenium 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Silver 0.048 1.314 38.106 0.00016 13 0.0007 0.0791 1.266 0.21 0.8351726 -0.649705 -1.62296422 10 Zinc 0.048 1.314 38.106 0.0008 63 0.02 0.777 1.266 17.08 8.2039079 7.1715286 17.91448986 10 bis(2-ethylhexl phthalate) 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 63 0.0035 0.00627 1.266 3.11 0.0662014 2.7327251 6.826351723 10 Dielden 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
(Qind) Industrial User total plant discharge flow in Million Gallons per Day (MGD) that contains a particular pollutant. (Qpotw) POTW's average influent flow in MGD.
(Qstr) Receiving stream (upstream) 7Q10 flow in MGD.
(Cstr) Receiving stream background level in mg/l.
(Rpotw) Removal efficiency across POTW as percent.
(Ccrit) State chronic water quality standard for a particular pollutant in mg/l. (Qdom) Domestic/commercial background flow in MGD.
(Cdom) Domestic/commercial background concentration for a particular pollutant in mg/l. (Lhw) Maximum allowable headworks pollutant loading to the POTW in pounds per day (lbs/day). (Ldom) Domestic/commercial background loading to the POTW for a particular pollutant in pounds per day (lbs/day). (Lind) Maximum allowable industrial loading to the POTW in pounds per day. (Cind) Industrial allowable local limit for a given pollutant in mg/l. (SF) Safety factor as a percent.
8.34 Unit conversion factor
Lhw = 8.34 * (Ccrit * (Qstr + Qpotw) - (Cstr * Qstr))
1 - Rpotw
::
TABLE 8
Local Limits Determination Based on Acute Water Quality Standards
ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND PROCESS DATA BASE MAXIMUM LOADING INDUSTRIAL IU Pollut. POTW Upstream Upstream Removal Acute Domestic and Commercial Allowable Domestic/ Allowable Local Safety Pollutant Flow Flow Flow Conc. Efficiency WQS Conc. Flow Headworks Commercial Loading Limit Factor (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (mg/l) (%) (mg/l) (mg/l) (MGD) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (mg/l) (%) (Qind) (Qpotw) (Qstr) (Cstr) (Rpotw) (Ccrit) (Cdom) (Qdom) (Lhw) (Ldom) (Lind) (Cind) (SF) Arsenic 0.048 1.314 38.106 3 15.52 0.08 0.0485 1.266 -1097 0.5120843 -988.20146 -2468.52883 10 Cadmium 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 51.48 0.01 0.0086 1.266 6.78 0.0908026 6.0074357 15.0065839 10 Chromium 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 9.17 0.02 0.0974 1.266 7.24 1.0283921 5.4867796 13.70598417 10 Hex. Chrom. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 - - 10
Copper 0.048 1.314 38.106 0.002 28.17 0.03 0.1015 1.266 12.85 1.0716817 10.489711 26.20331478 10 Cyanide 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 - - 10
Lead 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Mercury 0.048 1.314 38.106 0.0000005 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10 Molybdenum 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 16.69 0.0668 1.266 - 0.7053038 - - 10 Nickel 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 7.56 0.05 0.0628 1.266 17.78 0.66307 15.341177 38.32228479 10 Selenium 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
Silver 0.048 1.314 38.106 0.00016 12 0.007 0.0791 1.266 2.56 0.8351726 1.4664659 3.663234091 10 Zinc 0.048 1.314 38.106 0.0008 63 0.2 0.777 1.266 177.0 8.2039079 151.11632 377.4888142 10 bis(2-ethylhexl phthalate) 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 7.56 0.0628 1.266 - 0.66307 - - 10 Dielden 0.048 1.314 38.106 0 0 0 1.266 - 0 - - 10
(Qind) Industrial User total plant discharge flow in Million Gallons per Day (MGD) that contains a particular pollutant. (Qpotw) POTW's average influent flow in MGD.
(Qstr) Receiving stream (upstream) 1Q10 flow in MGD.
(Cstr) Receiving stream background level in mg/l.
(Rpotw) Removal efficiency across POTW as percent.
(Ccrit) State acute water quality standard for a particular pollutant in mg/l. (Qdom) Domestic/commercial background flow in MGD.
(Cdom) Domestic/commercial background concentration for a particular pollutant in mg/l. (Lhw) Maximum allowable headworks pollutant loading to the POTW in pounds per day (lbs/day). (Ldom) Domestic/commercial background loading to the POTW for a particular pollutant in pounds per day (lbs/day). (Lind) Maximum allowable industrial loading to the POTW in pounds per day. (Cind) Industrial allowable local limit for a given pollutant in mg/l. (SF) Safety factor as a percent.
8.34 Unit conversion factor
Lhw = 8.34 * (Ccrit * (Qstr + Qpotw) - (Cstr * Qstr))
1 - Rpotw
Appendix C
BIOSOLIDS COPPER TTLC AND STLC LABORATORY REPORTS
June 24, 2020
RE: WW
Order No.: 2006096
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Invoice No.: 153211
PO No.: 52826
City of Crescent City
Attn: Regina Goodgame-Thill
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
ELAP No.1247-Expires July 2020
ND = Not Detected at the Reporting Limit
Limit = Reporting Limit
All solid results are expressed on a wetweight basis unless otherwise noted.
Flag = Explanation in Case Narrative
Fraction Client Sample Description
01A Press Cake Grab Composite
01B Press Cake Grab Composite
Approved for release by:
5680 West End Road ● Arcata, California 95521-9202 ● 707-822-4649 ● www.northcoastlabs.com Roxanne Moore, Project Manager
1 of 7
CASE NARRATIVE
WorkOrder: 2006096
Date: 24-Jun-2020
Sample Press Cake Grab Composite was extracted following the method described in Title 22, CCR 66261.126, Appendix II (CAM WET).
5680 West End Road ● Arcata, California 95521-9202 ● 707-822-4649 ● www.northcoastlabs.com
NORTH COAST LABORATORIES
2 of 7
WorkOrder: 2006096
Date: 24-Jun-2020 ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client Sample ID: Press Cake Grab Composite
Lab ID: 2006096-01A Collected: 5/22/2020 13:23
Received: 6/4/2020
Test Name: EPA 6010B Reference: EPA 6010B
Parameter Result Flag Limit Units DF Extracted Analyzed Copper 41 1.0 mg/kg 1.0 6/15/2020 6/16/2020
Client Sample ID: Press Cake Grab Composite
Lab ID: 2006096-01B Collected: 5/22/2020 13:23
Received: 6/4/2020
Test Name: EPA 6010B Reference: EPA 6010B
Parameter Result Flag Limit Units DF Extracted Analyzed Copper ND 200 µg/L 20 6/15/2020 6/16/2020
5680 West End Road ● Arcata, California 95521-9202 ● 707-822-4649 ● www.northcoastlabs.com
NORTH COAST LABORATORIES
3 of 7
North Coast Laboratories, Ltd. Date: 6/24/2020
Project: WW
CLIENT: City of Crescent City
Work Order: 2006096
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blank
Sample ID MB-38720 Batch ID: 38720 Test Code: 6ICPS Analysis Date 6/16/2020 3:58:47 PM Prep Date 6/15/2020 Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val % Rec RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/kg
Limit
Client ID: Run ID: INICP2_200616B SeqNo: 1476928
Copper ND 1.0
Sample ID MB-38723 Batch ID: 38723 Test Code: 6ICPX Analysis Date 6/16/2020 2:30:11 PM Prep Date 6/15/2020 Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val % Rec RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: µg/L
Limit
Client ID: Run ID: INICP2_200616A SeqNo: 1476914
Copper ND 200
Qualifiers:
J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits
S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits
ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit
4 of 7
North Coast Laboratories, Ltd. Date: 6/24/2020
Project: WW
CLIENT: City of Crescent City
Work Order: 2006096
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Sample Matrix Spike
Sample ID 2006096-01AMS Batch ID: 38720 Test Code: 6ICPS Analysis Date 6/16/2020 4:08:35 PM Prep Date 6/15/2020 Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val % Rec RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/kg
Limit
Client ID: Press Cake Grab Composite Run ID: INICP2_200616B SeqNo: 1476932 Copper 128.4 1.0 41.3 100 87.1% 75 125 0
Sample ID 2006096-01AMSD Batch ID: 38720 Test Code: 6ICPS Analysis Date 6/16/2020 4:11:39 PM Prep Date 6/15/2020 Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val % Rec RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/kg
Limit
Client ID: Press Cake Grab Composite Run ID: INICP2_200616B SeqNo: 1476933 Copper 138.9 1.0 41.3 100 97.7% 75 125 128 7.92% 20
Sample ID 2006096-01BMS Batch ID: 38723 Test Code: 6ICPX Analysis Date 6/16/2020 2:49:26 PM Prep Date 6/15/2020 Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val % Rec LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: µg/L
Limit
Client ID: Press Cake Grab Composite Run ID: INICP2_200616A SeqNo: 1476920 Copper 1,854 200 19.6 2,000 91.7% 75 125 0
Qualifiers:
J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits
S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits
ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit
5 of 7
North Coast Laboratories, Ltd. Date: 6/24/2020
Project: WW
CLIENT: City of Crescent City
Work Order: 2006096
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Laboratory Control Spike
Sample ID LCS-38720 Batch ID: 38720 Test Code: 6ICPS Analysis Date 6/16/2020 4:00:49 PM Prep Date 6/15/2020 Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val % Rec RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/kg
Limit
Client ID: Run ID: INICP2_200616B SeqNo: 1476929
Copper 99.56 1.0 0 100 99.6% 80 120 0
Sample ID LCSD-38720 Batch ID: 38720 Test Code: 6ICPS Analysis Date 6/16/2020 4:03:15 PM Prep Date 6/15/2020 Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val % Rec RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/kg
Limit
Client ID: Run ID: INICP2_200616B SeqNo: 1476930
Copper 99.52 1.0 0 100 99.5% 80 120 99.6 0.0452% 20
Sample ID LCS-38723 Batch ID: 38723 Test Code: 6ICPX Analysis Date 6/16/2020 2:34:04 PM Prep Date 6/15/2020 Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val % Rec LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: µg/L
Limit
Client ID: Run ID: INICP2_200616A SeqNo: 1476915
Copper 1,905 200 0 2,000 95.3% 80 120 0
Sample ID LCSD-38723 Batch ID: 38723 Test Code: 6ICPX Analysis Date 6/16/2020 2:37:01 PM Prep Date 6/15/2020 Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val % Rec RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: µg/L
Limit
Client ID: Run ID: INICP2_200616A SeqNo: 1476916
Copper 1,886 200 0 2,000 94.3% 80 120 1,900 1.02% 20
Qualifiers:
J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits
S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits
ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit
6 of 7
7 of 7
ATTACHMENT 2
Y:\WP\2019\1976002.02 Stover Engineering - Desktop Evaluation\Crescentcitywpcfcapacityevaltm_11-11-19_Final.Docx © Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc.
November 11, 2019
Technical Memorandum
To: Ward Stover, P.E., Stover Engineering
From: Monty Hazlehurst, P.E., Kennedy Jenks
Reviewed: Charles Wright, P.E., Kennedy Jenks
Subject: Crescent City Water Pollution Control Facility Capacity Evaluation KJ 1976002*02
Purpose
The purpose of this Technical Memorandum (TM) is to present findings of the Crescent City Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) Capacity Evaluation. The capacity analysis was based on existing record drawings of the facility combined with industry accepted process capacity values.
Actual performance of the WPCF and condition of the various unit processes have not been assessed. Kennedy Jenks did not collect or review facility operating data or perform additional hydraulic modeling for this evaluation. Because of this, the capacity values included in this TM are theoretical capacities based on standard industry design values with citations noted. Actual capacity of the WPCF may differ.
Facility Capacity Summary
Plant capacity can be summarized into two categories: 1) hydraulic treatment capacity which is related to the volume of water that can be treated and 2) mass loading capacity that relates to the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD5) that the facility can potentially treat.
Although the WPCF can pass 7.8 million gallons per day (mgd) in flow while still maintaining a reasonable amount of freeboard, the hydraulic treatment capacity of the facility is 6.1 mgd.
This is controlled by the capacity of the chlorine contact basin (CCB) and the standard regulatory requirement to provide 20 minutes of detention time at peak design flow. Total mass loading capacity of the WPCF is estimated to be approximately 4,590 pounds per day (ppd) BOD5. Mass loading capacity of the WPCF is based on maximum month loading conditions and is the maximum average loading that the facility could theoretically treat over an extended 30-day period.
Capacities for each unit process were calculated as described below. They are summarized in Table 1.
Technical Memorandum
Mr. Ward Stover
Stover Engineering
November 11, 2019
KJ 1976002*02
Y:\WP\2019\1976002.02 Stover Engineering - Desktop Evaluation\Crescentcitywpcfcapacityevaltm_11-11-19_Final.Docx © Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc.
Hydraulic Capacity of the WPCF
The hydraulic capacity of the WPCF relates to the volume of water that can be moved through the treatment facility without overflowing basin walls. Hydraulic modeling done during design of the 2006 WPCF improvements projects showed that a total flow of about 9 mgd could pass through the facility. Flows in excess of this amount would overtop the grit basin walls.
Record drawings for the 2006 WPCF improvements show a peak wet weather flow (PWWF) design value of 7.8 mgd that would provide about 0.8 feet of freeboard within the facility. Normal design practice is to include an allowance for freeboard when setting the hydraulic capacity of treatment facilities. Thus, while it may be possible to move a total flow of 9 mgd through the facility, maximum hydraulic capacity of the facility should be set equal to 7.8 mgd.
Liquid Stream Treatment
As with the overall WPCF, capacity of each liquid stream treatment process can be put into two categories: hydraulic capacity and solids loading capacity. Each unit process is controlled by one of these two capacity categories. The following is a brief summary of the capacity of each unit within the liquid stream treatment process.
Headworks
Headworks screening is the first process unit in the liquid stream and is designed based on hydraulic capacity. There are two existing screens each with a capacity of 7.5 mgd for a total combined capacity of 15 mgd. Flows that exceed the capacity of the screens will bypass the screens and allow material, which would have been screened, to move downstream. Although the material may create a nuisance, it will have minimal impact on the downstream treatment processes.
Screened influent is pumped into the WPCF with five influent pumps ranging in capacities from
1.5 mgd to 5.23 mgd. Firm capacity (capacity with the largest pump out of service) is 13 mgd.
Grit removal is accomplished in two grit basins. The basins were originally designed as preaeration tanks and were converted to grit removal basins during the 2006 WPCF improvement project. Typical aerated grit chambers are sized to achieve 2 to 5 minutes of detention time (Table 5.17, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 4 th ed.,
2003). Because the basin geometry does not comply with industry standards for aerated grit chambers, Kennedy Jenks has de-rated the chambers assuming a minimum required detention time of 7 minutes. This equates to a total hydraulic capacity of 8.4 mgd.
Technical Memorandum
Mr. Ward Stover
Stover Engineering
November 11, 2019
KJ 1976002*02
Y:\WP\2019\1976002.02 Stover Engineering - Desktop Evaluation\Crescentcitywpcfcapacityevaltm_11-11-19_Final.Docx © Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc.
Primary Clarifiers
Primary clarifier design is based on hydraulic capacity. The WPCF has two primary clarifier tanks each with a surface area of 1,065 square feet (sf). Primary clarifiers are typically designed with a peak surface loading rate of 2,000 to 3,000 gallons per day per square foot (gpd/sf) (Table 5.20, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 4 th ed.,
2003). Assuming a surface loading rate of 3,000 gpd/sf, the primary clarifiers have a total combined capacity of 6.4 mgd.
A long standing industry standard for design assumes that properly loaded primary clarifiers will remove 25 to 40 percent of influent BOD5 (page 336, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 2
nd ed., 1979). However, because a surface loading rate of 3,000 gpd/sf was assumed, Kennedy Jenks has assumed a more conservative value of 20 percent. This value was used in estimating total treatment plant solids loading capacity.
Secondary Treatment
Secondary treatment is made up of two parallel treatment trains. The first is comprised of three, parallel trains of rotating biological contactors (RBCs) followed by three secondary clarifiers.
The second parallel treatment train is a membrane bioreactor (MBR) that was constructed as part of the 2006 WPCF improvements. Both trains can be operated concurrently and both discharge into the CCB.
The RBC treatment train is comprised of three parallel trains, each with four RBC stages.
Record drawings show that each RBC stage has a total surface area of 100,000 sf.
Kennedy Jenks reviewed documents from the 2006 WPCF improvements project that recommended modifications be made to the RBCs. These included removing the baffle wall between stages 1 and 2 of each train to effectively double the size of the first stage of the RBC.
Because mass loading capacity of RBCs is typically controlled by loading to the first stage, combining stages 1 and 2 could significantly increase total capacity of the RBC. However, the modifications were not completed and capacity calculations by Kennedy Jenks are based on the system’s original design with four stages in series.
Mass loading rates for RBC systems are expressed on mass of BOD5 per disk area basis and should be within the range of 24 to 30 grams BOD5 per square meter (g BOD/m2) (Table 9.8, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 4 th ed., 2003).
Assuming a design loading rate at the low end of this range (24 g BOD/m2) results in a total maximum mass loading capacity of 1,475 ppd BOD5. Assuming a conservative 20 percent BOD5 removal in the primary clarifiers, this equates to a total influent mass loading to the WPCF of about 1,840 ppd BOD5.
Technical Memorandum
Mr. Ward Stover
Stover Engineering
November 11, 2019
KJ 1976002*02
Y:\WP\2019\1976002.02 Stover Engineering - Desktop Evaluation\Crescentcitywpcfcapacityevaltm_11-11-19_Final.Docx © Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc.
The WPCF’s three rectangular secondary clarifiers each have a surface area of 1,680 sf.
Typical peak overflow rates for secondary clarifiers downstream of activated sludge processes range from 1,000 to 1,600 gpd/sf (Table 8.7, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 4
th ed., 2003). Because solids from fixed film treatment process such as RBCs may not settle as well as those from activated sludge processes, Kennedy Jenks assumed a value of 1,200 gpd/sf resulting in a peak flow capacity for the secondary clarifiers of 6 mgd.
Because MBRs are pumped systems, capacity is dependent on both hydraulic and mass loading considerations. The MBR installed as part of the 2006 WPCF improvements has a maximum hour flow capacity of 2.4 mgd. Mass loading capacity for biological treatment systems is typically based on the maximum month condition. The MBR system was designed based on a minimum solids retention time (SRT) of 12 days and a maximum mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) of 10,000 mg/L. Using these values and standard yield curves (Figure 11.7, WEF/ASCE, Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant, 4 th ed., 1998) results in a
maximum month loading to the MBR of 2,200 ppd BOD5. Assuming 20 percent BOD5 removal in the primary clarifiers, this equates to a total influent mass loading to the WPCF of 2,750 ppd BOD5.
Disinfection
The WPCF has two means of disinfecting secondary effluent: chlorination/dechlorination and ultraviolet (UV) disinfection. The existing CCB has a total volume of 85,000 gallons (gal).
Standard regulatory requirements are to provide a minimum detention time of 20 minutes at peak design flow. Given the volume of the basin, the capacity of the basin is 6.1 mgd.
The UV disinfection facility was constructed as part of the 2006 WPCF improvements project to disinfect MBR effluent for use as recycled water. There is currently no demand for recycled water and the UV disinfection facility is not in use. The UV system has a capacity of 2 mgd.
Effluent Conveyance
The WPCF has two effluent pumps each with a capacity of 4 mgd. Firm capacity of the effluent pumping system is thus 4 mgd.
The WPCF has two outfalls. Outfall 1 is composed of 12-inch and 18-inch-diameter piping and has a connection to the effluent pump station. It has a gravity flow capacity of 2 mgd and a capacity of 8 mgd with both effluent pumps running and 4 mgd with one pump operating.
Outfall 2 is composed of 24-inch-diameter piping and has a gravity flow capacity of 12 mgd.
Outfall 2 is not connected to the effluent pump station. Assuming use of only one effluent pump, total combined outfall capacity is 16 mgd.
Technical Memorandum
Mr. Ward Stover
Stover Engineering
November 11, 2019
KJ 1976002*02
Y:\WP\2019\1976002.02 Stover Engineering - Desktop Evaluation\Crescentcitywpcfcapacityevaltm_11-11-19_Final.Docx © Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc.
Solids Stream Treatment
The WPCF does not produce Class B biosolids. The City instead has chosen to dewater and landfill solids produced from the facility. To produce Class B biosolids, the digesters would need to provide a solids retention time (SRT) of 15 to 20 days. The existing digesters, which have a total effective volume of 145,411 gal, are too small to achieve this. However, because the digester load limits only apply when treating to Class B requirements, the capacity of the digesters is not currently relevant.
A belt filter press (BFP) is used to dewater solids pumped from the facility’s digesters. The BFP has a 1.5-meter-wide belt. Standard BFP capacity is 600 to 900 lb per hour (hr)per meter of belt width (pphm). Assuming a capacity of 750 pphm, if operated 5 days per week, 8 hrs per day, the BFP could dewater 6,400 lb/day of solids on an average annual basis. Assuming a conservative yield value of 1 lb total suspended solids (TSS) per 1 lb of BOD5 influent loading to the WPCF, this is equivalent to an influent mass loading to the WPCF of 6,400 ppd BOD5.
Table 1: Unit Process Capacity
Unit Process Capacity
Hydraulic Mass Loading(o)
Liquid Stream
Headworks Screening(a) 15 mgd -
Influent Pumping(b) 13 mgd -
Grit Removal(c) 8.4 mgd -
Primary Clarifiers(d) 6.4 mgd -
Secondary Treatment
MBR(e) 2.4 mgd 2,750 lbs/day BOD5
Rotating Biological
Contactors(f)
- 1,840 lbs/day BOD5
Secondary Clarifiers(g) 6.0 mgd -
Combined Capacity 8.4 mgd 4,590 lbs/day BOD5
Disinfection
Chlorination(h) 6.1 mgd -
Ultraviolet(i) 2.0 mgd -
Effluent Pumping(j) 4.0 mgd -
Effluent Outfall
Outfall 1(k) 4 mgd -
Outfall 2(l) 12 mgd -
Combined Outfall Capacity 16 mgd -
Solids Stream
Digestion(m) NA -
Dewatering(n)- 6,400 lbs/day BOD5
Technical Memorandum
Mr. Ward Stover
Stover Engineering
November 11, 2019
KJ 1976002*02
Y:\WP\2019\1976002.02 Stover Engineering - Desktop Evaluation\Crescentcitywpcfcapacityevaltm_11-11-19_Final.Docx © Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc.
Notes:
(a) Screens: Two screens in service at 7.5 mgd each.
(b) Influent Pumps: Five pumps total with capacities of 1.5 mgd, 2.43 mgd, 3.89 mgd, and 5.23 mgd (two pumps). Capacity shown is that with one of the two largest pumps (5.23 mgd) out of service. Based on information contained in the record drawings for the 2006 WPCF improvements project. (c) Grit Removal: Capacity based on providing 7 minutes of detention time with two aerated grit basins each with a volume of 20,600 gallons. Typical design criteria for aerated grit basins is to provide 2 to 5 minutes detention time. Kennedy Jenks has assumed a higher detention time is needed effectively derating the grit removal system because the basin configuration does not meet standard design requirements (Table 5.17, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 4 th ed., 2003).
(d) Primary Clarifiers: Capacity based on operation of two clarifiers with a surface area of 1,065 ft2 each at a surface loading rate of 3,000 gpd/sf. Standard design surface loading rates range from 2,000 to 3,000 gpd/sf (Table 5.20, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 4 th ed., 2003).
(e) MBR: Hydraulic capacity based on the peak hour pumping capacity of the MBR system. Peak day capacity is 1.8 mgd and average annual capacity is 1.2 mgd. Mass loading capacity based on maximum month design criteria for the MBR system (2,200 ppd BOD5) and is expressed in terms of influent mass loading to the treatment plant assuming 20 percent BOD5 removal in the primary clarifiers. (f) Rotating Biological Contactors: Capacity based on three parallel trains in service each with four stages with a surface area of 100,000 sf per stage. Typical loading for RBCs ranges from 24 to 30 g BOD/m2 (Table 9.8, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 4 th ed., 2003). Mass
loading capacity shown is based on a loading rate of 24 g BOD/m2to the first stage (1,475 ppd BOD5) and expressed in terms of influent mass loading to the treatment plant assuming 20 percent BOD5 removal in the primary clarifiers.
(g) Secondary Clarifiers: Capacity based on three clarifiers in service each with a surface area of 1,680 sf and overflow rate of 1,200 gpd/sf. Standard design loading rates range from 1,000 to 1,600 gpd/sf (Table 8.7, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 4 th ed., 2003).
(h) Chlorine Disinfection: Capacity based on 85,000-gallon chlorine contact tank providing 20 minutes detention time at peak flow (standard regulatory requirement). (i) UV Disinfection: The UV disinfection system is currently not connected for discharge. No impact on plant capacity. Capacity of UV disinfection system per record drawings for the 2006 WPCF improvements project.
(j) Effluent Pumping. Capacity based on two pumps (1 duty and 1 standby) each with a capacity of
4.0 mgd each.
(k) Outfall 1: Connected to the effluent pumps. Capacity of 4 mgd based on operation of one of the two effluent pumps.
(l) Outfall 2: Capacity based on gravity flow.
(m) Digesters: Two existing digesters with a total effective volume of 145,411 gallons. Volume is not enough to meet regulatory criteria for Class B biosolids. However, since the City is currently landfilling solids produced by the WPCF, load limits are not applicable.
(n) Dewatering: BFP capacity typically ranges from 600 to 900 lb/hr of meter width (pphm). Assuming a capacity of 750 pphm, the WPCF’s 1.5-meter BFP could dewater 6,400 lb/day of solids on an annual average basis if operated 8 hrs per day, 5 days per week. Assuming a conservative yield value for the WPCF of 1 lb TSS produced per 1 lb of BOD5 loading this is equivalent to a mass loading to the WPCF of 6,400 ppd of BOD5.
(o) Mass loading values shown are in terms of influent BOD5 loading to the treatment plant. For secondary treatment mass loading capacity values shown, this includes an assumed 20 percent BOD5 removal in the primary clarifiers. For dewatering, it assumes a total mass yield of 1 lb TSS per 1 lb of BOD5 influent loading to the WPCF.
From: Herman, Matthew T.@Waterboards <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2022 11:47 AM
To: Orrin <[email protected]>; 'Jonathan Olson' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Crescent City Local Limits Spreadsheets
Jonathan/Orrin,
State Water Board provided me a summary of their review of your Local Limit Study and identified several small inconsistencies within the calculations. I’m uncertain if any of these would result in a change to the final determinations made in your study but I think it may be worth discussing. SWB’s only resulting concern is related to the removal of the local limit for zinc as this had the elevated sample result (sample CS#1) on Sept 5, 2019. Your treatment system also showed higher than normal influent and effluent sample results for zinc near this date. They are recommending that additional review of past and present industrial users be conducted to see if zinc was ever present in samples and that the zinc limit be retained if it has been or still is present. Let me know your thoughts and I’d be happy to discuss.
Thanks,
Matt
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ANDREW LEIGHTON, ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGER
DATE: APRIL 18, 2022
SUBJECT: CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH JACOBS AND APPLICATION FOR
ADDITIONAL GRANT FUNDING
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute contract amendment # 4 with Jacobs Engineering for Phase 1 of the RBC/Digester upgrade design. • Authorize staff to request a time extension for Phase 1 and make application for additional Clean Water State Revolving Funds to accommodate future phases of the design
BACKGROUND
The Crescent City Wastewater Treatment Plant serves a disadvantaged community (DAC) and has struggled to meet the financial commitments of the SRF loan for a major plant renovation which was completed in 2011. Although the City was successful in completing a Proposition 218 process to address revenue deficiency with rates, a ballot referendum (Measure Q) rejected the proposed rate increases in November 2016. An updated financial pro forma analysis completed in 2018 indicated the Sewer Fund would deplete all reserves and go negative by fiscal year 2023-24 if budgeted operating costs and revenue remained unchanged. Over the past years the City has worked closely with the State Water Board Division of Financial Assistance, and Regional Water Quality Board to develop a strategic plan to address this shortfall. Key elements of the plan include the following:
• Revenue – Increase revenue through addition of new customers and reduction in facility variable and fixed operating costs using Prop 1 and other grant processes. • Relief – Seek relief of debt principal. The City has tried this approach and was unsuccessful in obtaining debt relief.
• Restructure – Restructuring debt to increase the period or restructure how the SRF loan is amortized. Staff has worked with the State Water Resources Control Board Contract amendment with Jacobs
APRIL 18, 2022
2 (SWRCB) over the past several years on this element. Great strides have been accomplished including extending the loan period from 20 to 30 years, reducing the interest rate from 2.4% to 0%, and financially shaping the loan amortization.
These actions will save this community more than 14 million dollars over the life of the loan.
• Rates – Continue to analyze rates to ensure an equitable rate structure and a sustainable utility; recent California Supreme Court decision declared that rates that pass the Prop 218 process are not subject to referendum (Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir, 9 Cal.5th.1105 (2020))
• Operations - Optimizing operations and stabilizing plant staffing by engaging Jacobs Engineering on August 15, 2019 as our WWTP operations team.
Staff submitted a Prop 1 application in 2020 to request grant funding to proceed with analysis and design for these projects, and subsequently updated the application and resolution to reflect the funding source would be the State Revolving Fund instead of Prop 1.
On May 17, 2021 the City Council of the City of Crescent City via Resolution 2021-29 authorized the City Manager to execute all agreements with the SWRCB. Additionally on the same date the City Council via Resolution 2021-30 amended the Crescent City Annual Budget.
On June 2, 2021 the SWRCB fully executed and awarded a 100% forgivable loan to the City of Crescent City in the sum of $393,405. This budget has been rolled over into the current years budget and Staff have worked closely with Jacobs on developing a scope and fee that fits within the budget. The purpose is to develop revenue enhancement and cost reduction projects. These projects will be designed to lower variable operating costs through efficiency improvements. This is a vital component to the goal of making the utility financially healthy, to protect public safety, and ensure ongoing environmental performance.
ITEM ANALYSIS
Ten projects were identified for grant eligibility screening and potential further development beginning with a preliminary engineering evaluation/project initiation documents. Of the ten projects, the top three identified to enhance revenue and/or reduce operations and maintenance (O&M) costs are:
1. Rotating Biological Contractors (RBC) Capital Upgrade
2. Membrane BioReactors (MBR) Membrane Replacement
3. Biosolids/Digester Optimization
The City is currently negotiating a price to replace membranes outside of the grant and as such only the RBC and Biosolids/Digester projects will be initiated.
The grant that the City obtained will only cover Phase 1 of the project development which takes the project through preliminary design. The State recomended that the City request the additional funds needed to take the project through 100% design and also fund a construction grant application. Staff are currently working with Jacobs to develop a scope Contract amendment with Jacobs
APRIL 18, 2022
3 and fee to cover the 100% design. A time extension will also be needed as the current project duration to complete 100% design will exceed the expenditure deadline of Septemeber 30, 2023.
If authorized by Council, staff would complete Phase 1 of the project via contract amendment with Jacobs, submit a supplemental request to the State for funding that would fund 100% design for the RBC and Digester rehab once a scope and fee has been developed by Jacobs, and request the maximum allowable time extension also.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
No fiscal impact other than administrative staff time.
Phase 1 - Preliminary Design
FORGIVABLE LOAN AMOUNT $393,405
Proposed JACOBS Amendment 4 PHASE 1
– Preliminary Design Design $370,002
Phase 2 – Final Design & Construction Funding Grant Application Assistance If authorized by Council to complete phase 1, an estimate will be generated by Jacobs to complete the final design. Staff will then request an additional allocation of funding to complete the future scope of work from the State. It is currently estimated that this cost work will be in the range of $700,000. Resulting in total the engineering costs for RBC and Biosolids/Digester projects to be approximately $1,000,000. Other than staff time it is anticipated the design portion of the project as well as technical assistance to apply for construction grant funding will be 100% funded by the State.
Phase 3 – Construction
Anticipated project construction costs (Engineers Estimate) will be developed as part of the final package. Staff anticipates applying for grants to help fund the construction. What the grant opportunities will be at that time is unknown as well as what (if any) the City’s required match might be. Once phase 2 is complete staff will report out on the proposed project and next steps for Council consideration.
Staff will bring back a contract amendment to cover future phases of the project if funding is obtained.
STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
This action supports the following Strategic Plan goals… Contract amendment with Jacobs
APRIL 18, 2022
4 GOAL 1: Support quality services, community safety, and health to enhance the quality of life and experience of our residents and visitors.
D. Provide and maintain an efficient, adequate infrastructure to provide for both current and future community needs
GOAL 2: Promote a thriving local economy
A. Evaluate and optimize additional revenue sources
D. Collaborate with other jurisdictions and non-profits to maximize regional effectiveness and amplify funding opportunities
GOAL 3: Obtain the highest levels of organizational excellence B. Maintain responsible fiscal management and accountability
ATTACHMENTS
1. Jacobs contract amendment 4 for Phase 1 Designs of RBC and Digester rehab. 1 AMENDMENT NO. 04
to the
AGREEMENT FOR OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
for the
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY, CALIFORNIA
This Amendment No. 04 (the “Amendment) in the Agreement for Wastewater Facilities Operations, Maintenance and Management Services for City of Crescent City, California, dated August 5, 2019 (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of ___, 2022 between the City of Crescent City, California (hereinafter “Owner”) and Operations Management International, Inc. (hereinafter “Contractor”).
NOW THEREFORE, Owner and Contractor agree to the following:
1. Contractor will perform additional services as allowed by Section 13.2 of the Agreement.
2. The scope of additional services is outlined in the attached document “Crescent City Wastewater Treatment Plant, RBC Capital Upgrade & Biosolids/Digester Optimization Project Scope of Work & Assumptions – Phase 1”. Owner shall pay Contractor as compensation for the additional services performed under this Agreement an amount of Three Hundred Seventy Thousand and Two Dollars ($370,002).
This Amendment together with all previous Amendments and the Agreement constitute the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes all prior oral and written understanding with respect to the subject matter set forth herein. Unless specifically states all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Neither this Amendment nor the Agreement may be modified except in writing signed by an authorized representative of the Parties.
The Parties, intending to be legally bound, indicate their approval of this Amendment by their signatures below.
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT CITY OF CRESCENT CITY, CALIFORNIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Authorized Signature: Authorized Signature:
Name: Dennis Burrell Name: Eric Wier
Title: Director of Operations Title: City Manager
Date: Date:
April 14, 2022
2 Crescent City Wastewater Treatment Plant
RBC Capital Upgrade & Biosolids/Digester Optimization Project Scope of Work & Assumptions – Phase 1
The Project includes the evaluation of upgrades to the Rotating Biological Contactors (RBC) and Biosolids processing to help optimize the WWTP, improve water quality and avoid depletion of reserves. Phase 1 Project deliverables consist of a Field Report and Preliminary Engineering Report (Task 1) and 30 and 50 % Preliminary Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates (Task 2).
An amendment to the contract is anticipated for Phase 2 of the Project for the two other tasks required to complete Project No. C-06-8558-110 State Water Resources Control Board funding agreement requirements. These tasks consist of preparing environmental documents (Task 3) and Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) construction funding application (Task 4).
The following is our proposed scope of work and assumptions for Tasks 1 and 2 which are included in Phase 1.
Task 1. Project Report. The following subtasks correspond to Task 1.1 and 1.2 of the funding agreement.
Task 1.1. Field Report. Gather, review, and summarize as-built data, current and project demands, and findings of inspections in a field report. Raw Wastewater Characterization:
o Discuss and develop consecutive 30-day raw wastewater influent sampling plan and submit to the City of Crescent (City) for execution, collection, and analysis of the following parameters: influent raw wastewater flow, total and soluble five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5 and sBOD5), total and volatile suspended solids (TSS and VSS), total Kjjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia (NH3), phosphorus, water temperature, pH and alkalinity.
o Review and compile sampling results. Compare results with previous wastewater characteristics reported in the City’s April 2021 Report of Water Discharge and other readily available documents provided by the City. o Obtain population projections from Table 3 of the City’s Report of Waste Discharge and leverage to develop flow and load projections based on raw wastewater characteristics measured with the sampling plan. Rotating Biological Contactors (RBCs) Retrofit
o Gather and review original RBC equipment design/criteria parameters and engineering drawings.
o Verify process information including average and peak surface loading rates, removal efficiency, and other key process operating parameters. o Visit the WWTP site, to visual observe and assess each of the RBCs’ structural, process and corrosion related condition. Review RBC components including shaft, media support system, mechanical drives, bearings to determine if any components have failed due to excess wear and tear and whether these units have surpassed their useful life expectancy. Determine if any components need to 3 be replaced or repaired to extend the useful life of these units. If needed, discuss media replace needs with manufacturer and methods to enhance configuration and reduce O&M costs.
o City is assumed to have each of the RBCs fully accessible and have addressed all safety requirements, including confined space entry.
o Assess the ability of the RBCs to meet current wastewater discharge requirements described in the City’s NPDES Permit (Order No. R1-2017-0002, NPDES No.
CA0022756) with respect to both current and future raw wastewater influent flows and loads.
Digester Rehabilitation/Replacement
o Gather and review original Digester No. 1 and 2 design criteria/parameters and engineering drawings.
o Verify process information including solids loading rate, hydraulic loading, and volatile solids reduction.
o Gather typical heating and mixing rates in primary digester. o Visit the WWTP site to visual observe and assess Digester No. 1 and 2 structural, process and corrosion related condition. Determine, if any, the digester components that will need to be replaced to ensure proper, ongoing and uninterrupted operation.
o Assess the structural integrity of the two existing digester tanks and roofs through on site observation of the interiors and exteriors of the digesters. City is assumed to have digesters fully accessible and have addressed all safety requirements, including confined space entry.
Deliverables: Field Report in electronic, PDF, format.
Task 1.2 Project Report. Prepare draft and final engineering reports to satisfy requirements described in Attachment T1 of the SWRCB Technical Application Package for a CWSRF construction funding application
(https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/grants_loans/srf/docs/forms/applica tion_technical_package.pdf).
The City’s April 2021 Report of Waste Discharge shall be used to satisfy many of report section requirements associated with the Project Area; Wastewater Characteristics, Existing Facilities, and Current Water Quality; and Treatment Objectives for Discharge or Reuse.
Alternative analysis shall be limited to comparison of (a) second treatment alternatives to replace the existing RBCs and (b) the repair/rehabilitation or replacement of the existing digestors. Secondary treatment alternatives to be considered in the alternatives analysis should have relatively low annual operating and maintenance (O&M) costs like the RBCs to be considered viable. Therefore, alternatives compared in the analysis shall be limited to status quo (RBCs), A-stage (high rate biological contact system), and moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR).
Membrane bioreactor (MBR) will also be included in the analysis for comparison purposes, however annual O&M costs are anticipated to be higher than the other alternatives listed. 4 For the digester alternative analysis, determine the components that will need to be replaced to ensure proper, ongoing and uninterrupted operation. Determine the footprint of the existing and new digester tanks and formulate a plan for demolition of the old digester tanks. Determine if additional concrete slabs will need to be installed to house new equipment or if existing space and slabs are adequate. Perform a cost/benefit analysis to determine the number, size, type (floating or attached roof), and configuration of digesters to reduce O&M costs.
Summarize the results of the Task 1.1, alternative analysis, and other information, data and results and develop a recommended long-term plan. Describe the facilities that need to be replaced or repaired/rehabilitated along with proposed locations, sizing, and planning level cost estimates. Describe any recommended upgrades or changes to design parameters and criteria.
Deliverables: Draft and final Project Report in electronic, PDF, format.
Task 2. Preliminary Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate. The following corresponds to Task 2 of the funding agreement.
Task 2.1 30 % Submittal. Prepare preliminary drawings and table of contents for the technical specifications for the selected project. See Table 1 for a preliminary listing of drawings for the selected project along with those to be included in the 30 and 50% submittals. This list is based on repair/rehabilitation of the existing RBCs and digesters and may require modification based on the results of Tasks 1 and 2 and the selected project.
A listing of applicable permits and associated costs and a fee estimate for completing design of the selected project will also be provided with this submittal.
Deliverables: Preliminary Drawings (see Table 1), technical specification table of contents, conceptual level cost estimate and preliminary fee estimate for completing design.
Task 2.2 50% Submittal. Update and further develop preliminary drawings, table of contents for the technical specifications, and conceptual level cost estimate for the selected project. See Table 1 for a preliminary listing of drawings to be included in the 50% submittal.
The preliminary listing of applicable permits and associated costs will be reviewed and further refined along with the fee estimate for completing design of the selected project.
Deliverables: Preliminary Drawings (see Table 1), updated technical specification table of contents, updated conceptual level cost estimate and fee estimate for completing design.
Table 1. Proposed Drawing List
No. Drawing Title Submittal
30% 50%
1 Cover Sheet, Location Map, Vicinity Map X X
2 Drawing Index X X
3 General Abbreviations and Symbols X X
4 Structural Notes – 1 X X
5 Structural Notes – 2 X X
5 6 Mechanical Legend and Notes X X
7 Electrical Legend – 1 X
8 Electrical Legend – 2 X
9 Instrumentation and Control Legend – 1 X
10 Instrumentation and Control Legend – 2 X
11 Digester Plan and Section – Demolition X X
12 Digester Section and Details - Demolition X
13 Rotating Biological Contractors (RBC) Plan - Demolition X X 14 RBC Sections and Details - Demolition X
15 Digester Plan and Section - Basement Plan X X
16 Upper Floor Plan X
17 Roof Plan X
18 Sections – Digesters X
19 Gas Piping Isometric – Digesters X
20 Steam, Hot Water, Boiler and Heat Exchanger Piping
Isometric – Digesters
X
21 Sludge Piping Isometric – Digesters X
22 P&ID 1 – Digesters X
23 P&ID 2 – Digesters X
24 P&ID 3 – Digesters X
25 Electrical Plan – Digesters
26 Electrical One Line Diagram
27 Rotating Biological Contractors (RBC) Plan X X
28 RBC – Sections X
29 RBC - Sections and Details
30 RBC Air Scrubber System
31 RBC - P&ID X
32 RBC - Electrical Plan
Schedule
Project schedule was assumed to be eighteen (18) months from January 2022 through June 2023. Approximately 1 year to complete Task 1 and the remaining six months to complete Task
2. Assumptions
The following assumptions were made for the development of this scope of work, schedule and estimated level of effort.
1) Project manager will prepare and submit a monthly progress report and invoice which will describe project status, costs, remaining budget, conformance to schedule, reasons for any deviation from the work plan, and a listing of critical items and needs anticipated to occur the following month.
6 2) Jacobs is not obligated to perform work beyond agreed upon level of effort and/or fee estimate.
3) Budget for surveying, geotechnical, and potholing and/or location of existing utilities are not included in the fee estimate at this time. These services to be added to the contract if needed.
4) Drainage improvements and/or report will not be required for this work. 5) Billing rates shall escalate at a rate of 3 percent per year, starting in January of each year and the labor rates incorporated into our cost tables have this escalation included. 6) Site security and other security systems within the WWTP site are assumed to be adequate and do not require improvements or upgrades.
7) Jacobs will reasonably rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of existing information.
8) Work will be based on the federal, state and local codes and standards in effect on the effective date of the authorization to proceed. Any changes in these codes may necessitate a change in scope, schedule and/or fee.
9) Any investigation and remediation of possible hazardous waste, asbestos, lead paint or other types of contamination will be conducted by others or as a separate contract. 10) Related to events beyond the control of Jacobs, schedule extensions shall be discussed and a reasonable and mutually agreeable extension of time for performance of its services under this agreement shall be granted.
11) Any cost opinions or project economic evaluations provided by Jacobs will be on a basis of experience and judgement, but since Jacobs has no control over market or bidding conditions, Jacobs cannot warrant that estimates, bids, ultimate construction cost, or project economics will not vary from these opinions.
12) Exhibit 1 includes our fee estimate for the Phase 1 scope of services defined above.
Jacobs shall not be held to individual line item estimates, and the not-to-exceed amount only applies to the aggregate of all task costs.
13) Exhibit 1 also includes our anticipated fee estimate for Phase 2 which includes Task 3 and 4. Phase 2 work is anticipated to be added to the scope of work via a future contract amendment and subject to other assumptions and limitations.
Cost of Services
This work is to be performed on a time and materials basis using the labor and cost breakdown provided in Exhibit 1.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
ANDREW LEIGHTON, ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGER
MARTHA D. RICE, CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: APRIL 18, 2022
SUBJECT: E-SCOOTERS: OPERATIONS AND LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH BIRD RIDES, INC.
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and Authorize the City Manager to sign a Shared Mobility Device Operations and License Agreement with Bird Rides, Inc.
BACKGROUND
Bird Rides, Inc. is a last-mile, stand-up electric vehicle sharing company dedicated to bringing affordable, environmentally friendly transportation solutions to communities. Bird Rides is based in Santa Monica (founded in 2017) and became publicly traded in May 2021. They operate in 400+ cities and provide 125M+ rides.
Prospective riders will download the Bird app, sign a user agreement, verify their age (18+), verify driver’s license, add a payment method, complete educational tutorials, then will be permitted to use an available scooter. A smartphone is required for rental.
Bird typically hires local fleet manager(s) who are responsible for charging, repair, repositioning of the scooters. The fleet manager is expected to retrieve and recharge the scooters on a periodic basis. Scooters left on streets & sidewalks are typically repositioned each day in existing bike racks or at key locations as determined by Bird.
Typical rental rates are $1.00 initial fee followed by $0.15-$0.20 per minute. The rates are set by Bird and the City is not involved in setting these rates.
BIRD RIDES, INC
APRIL 18, 2022
2 Bird Rides, Inc. approached the City with a proposal to deploy electric scooters within the city limits. As of January 1, 2021, AB 1286 requires that a “shared mobility service provider” may not begin operations within a jurisdiction until that jurisdiction has adopted rules for the operation, parking and maintenance of “shared mobility devices” (i.e., electric boards, scooters and bicycles). The rules may be set forth in an ordinance, permit or agreement.
Due to the newness of this program to our area, staff determined that an agreement would be the most appropriate format to set forth the rules of operation.
ITEM ANALYSIS
The City Attorney drafted an agreement for the Council’s consideration. The agreement covers the remainder of calendar year 2022 and then automatically renews for successive six-month periods. Highlights from the agreement are summarized as follows:
• City grants Bird a non-exclusive, revocable license to use City rights-of-way for the parking of scooters owned and operated by Bird, subject to the terms of the agreement.
• Scooters must comply with Vehicle Code §§ 21223 (lamps and reflectors), 21226 (noise limitations), and 21227 (braking).
• Scooters must display a unique identification number, Bird’s name and telephone number, GPS locator, and reminder that riding scooters on sidewalks / crosswalks is prohibited.
• Scooters are allowed to be parked on City sidewalks or other hard surfaces in a manner that does not impede pedestrian access, ADA parking zones, street furniture, driveways, bus stops, loading zones or landscaping. • Bird is required to remove any scooter within 2 hours that has been reported as damaged, inoperable, improperly parked, or otherwise abandoned. • If City must remove a scooter from the public right-of-way, a $250 fee will be charged.
• Bird must submit an operations plan to City detailing how it will comply with the terms of the agreement.
• Bird must maintain a toll-free customer service phone line and website or app. • Bird must maintain and repair all scooters on a regular basis. • Bird must submit an education plan to City detailing how it will educate riders regarding the rules and regulations of riding scooters (riding, parking, safety). • Bird must obtain a business license and mobile vending permit. • Bird must include a waiver in favor of City in its rental agreement. • Bird will share its trip data and injury reports with City. • Bird is required to carry minimum amounts of insurance and to indemnify and hold harmless the City from claims arising from Bird’s operations within the City. • City or Bird may terminate the agreement upon 30 days’ notice at any time.
If the City Council approves this agreement, Bird anticipates deploying a fleet of 25 scooters the first week of May.
BIRD RIDES, INC
APRIL 18, 2022
3 FISCAL ANALYSIS
The City would receive a small amount of revenue from the issuance of the appropriate business license and permits.
This Agreement does not provide any other specific financial benefit but does provide the option of a fun amenity to the community and visitors which generally benefits the City There is anticipated to be some staff time required to process licenses and administer the Agreement. It is possible that there will be some staff time required during start-up to direct resident/visitor questions and complaints to Bird Rides, Inc.
STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
GOAL 1: Support quality services, community safety, and health to enhance the quality of life and experience of our residents and visitors.
D. Provide and maintain an efficient, adequate infrastructure to provide for both current and future community needs
E. Target economic development improvements that provide additional benefit by enhancing the quality of life for residents
GOAL 2: Promote a thriving local economy
B. Support community organizations that provide measurable services to the community
E. Create an environment that is conducive to attracting and retaining strong, sustainable businesses that reflect community needs and culture F. Plan and prepare for the growth and future needs of the Crescent City community by:
• Streamlining services that support new, existing, and prospective businesses
• Evaluating and updating the City’s Municipal Code to assure maximized efficiencies, clarity, and effectiveness
ATTACHMENTS
1. Shared Mobility Device Operations and License Agreement with Bird Rides, Inc.
2. City Partnerships - Bird
SHARED MOBILITY DEVICE OPERATIONS AND LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AND BIRD RIDES, INC.
This shared mobility device operations and license agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the City of Crescent City, a California municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Bird Rides, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“BIRD”), for the purpose of authorizing BIRD to deploy a fleet of electric scooters within the boundaries of CITY and setting the terms and conditions therefor.
WHEREAS, BIRD has approached CITY with a request to deploy electric scooters (a “shared mobility device”) within the boundaries of CITY; and
WHEREAS, AB 1286 requires that as of January 1, 2021, any city that authorizes a shared mobility device provider to operate within its jurisdiction to adopt operation, parking, and maintenance rules regarding the use of the shared mobility devices in its jurisdiction before the provider may offer said service; and WHEREAS, the required regulations may be included as part of an ordinance, permit or agreement; and WHEREAS, this agreement will satisfy the requirements of AB 1286 and set clear expectations and terms for the provision of shared mobility services within the City of Crescent City.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to the following terms and conditions:
1.0 TERM
The term of this Agreement is from the effective date hereof through December 31, 2022, unless terminated sooner as provided herein. This Agreement will renew for successive six-month periods unless either party provides written notice to the other party of its intention not to renew at least 60 days prior to the end of the then-current term. This Agreement contains additional provisions regarding early termination in Section 8.0.
2.0 LICENSE
2.1 Nature and Purpose of License. CITY hereby grants BIRD a non-exclusive, revocable license to use CITY rights-of-way for the parking of scooters owned and operated by BIRD, subject to the terms of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a lease, easement or other interest in CITY property to BIRD or its customers.
2.2 Scooter Definition. For purposes of this Agreement, “scooter” means a “motorized scooter” as defined in Section 407.5 of the California Vehicle Code, subject to the following further restrictions: each scooter (i) must weigh no more than 150 pounds; (ii) possess handlebars and an electric motor and no other power source; and (iii) be limited to a maximum speed of no more than 15 mph on a paved level surface.
2.3 License Limitations. BIRD’s exercise of its rights under this Agreement must not: (i) hinder or interfere with the use of CITY rights-of-way, streets, sidewalks, bike lanes, or other property; (ii) inhibit pedestrian or vehicular movement; (iii) adversely affect the property of any third parties; and (iv) create any dangerous condition or a condition which is a threat to public safety or security.
BIRD RIDES, INC. PAGE 2|
2.4 Size of Fleet. BIRD may operate a maximum of 50 scooters; provided, that BIRD may request approval to deploy additional scooters. CITY may grant or deny the request to deploy additional scooters in its sole discretion. Any approval or denial will be in writing and provided to BIRD.
3.0 SCOOTERS
3.1 Scooter Specifications. All scooters deployed by BIRD must:
a. Comply with the provisions of California Vehicle Code Sections 21223, 21226, and 21227;
b. Meet the minimum standards of the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission or UL 2272 Standard for Electrical Systems for Personal E-Mobility Devices; c. Display a unique identification number in a visible location; d. Display BIRD’s name and telephone number in a visible location, together with wording indicating that this telephone number may be used to report inoperable or unsafe scooters;
e. Display a sticker or stencil communicating to riders that riding the scooter on sidewalks and within crosswalks is prohibited; and
f. Be equipped with a GPS unit capable of providing real-time location data.
3.2 Scooter Parking.
a. Scooters may be parked on CITY sidewalks or other hard surfaces in a manner that does not impede pedestrian access and provides a minimum of three feet for a pedestrian walkway; does not impede or obstruct access to ADA parking zones, street furniture, curb ramps, entry ways, driveways, bus stops, loading zones or landscaping; and does not impede or obstruct vehicular traffic on a street or alley. Scooters may not be parked or left in landscape planting beds or on landscape materials. Scooter must be parked upright and not lying down.
b. This does not grant permission for scooters to be parked or otherwise left on private property or public property belonging to government entities other than CITY, nor to restrict any such entity from adopting its own requirements or prohibitions concerning scooters on its property.
c. BIRD will be responsible for compliance with all parking requirements set forth herein, regardless of whether scooters have been parked or left by BIRD riders, employees or agents, or other persons.
d. BIRD must require all scooter riders to take a photo whenever they park their scooter at the end of a ride, and upload that photo to the BIRD app.
3.3 Removal of Scooters. CITY or its employees or agents, or any property owner upon whose property a scooter has been left in violation of this Agreement, in violation of the California Vehicle Code, or without the property owner’s consent, may report to BIRD the location of a scooter that is inoperable or damaged or unsafe to operate, improperly parked, or in a prohibited location. BIRD must thereafter remove the scooter within two hours. BIRD must BIRD RIDES, INC. PAGE 3|
keep a log of all reports it or its agents receive of improperly parked scooters, including the time and location thereof, as well as the time each scooter is thereafter removed.
3.4 Removal of Hazards. CITY may immediately remove any scooter from the CITY right-of-way if the scooter is creating a hazard that threatens the health, safety, or welfare of a person. In addition, CITY may remove any scooter parked or left in violation of this Agreement once two hours have elapsed from the time of the scooter being reported to BIRD. In the event the CITY removes a scooter, City must thereafter notify BIRD, as soon as is reasonably practicable. BIRD will be required pay CITY a fee of $250 for each such removal, which BIRD acknowledges is a reasonable estimate of CITY’s staff costs and storage costs. BIRD will retrieve any scooter removed by CITY within 24 hours’ of receiving notice from CITY. Nothing herein affects the rights of any private property owner to regulate or prohibit the use of BIRD scooters on private property or to exercise any legal equitable remedies the private property owner may possess.
4.0 OPERATIONS
4.1 Operations Plan. Prior to commencing operations hereunder, BIRD must submit to CITY, and obtain approval from CITY of a plan demonstrating how BIRD will:
a. Ensure CITY rights-of-way are unobstructed by scooters; b. Ensure that scooters do not obstruct accessible paths of travel; c. Ensure that scooters are parked in approved locations; d. Collecting scooters and redeploying them to areas of high demand; e. Ensuring that all scooters are relocated to approved parking areas each morning; and f. Comply with its obligation under Section 3.3 herein to collect scooters within two hours of receiving notice of an inoperable, unsafe, or improperly parked scooter.
4.2 Customer Service. BIRD must maintain a toll-free 24-hour, 7 days per week multilingual customer service phone number and website and/or mobile app customer interface for riders to report safety concerns, complaints, or to ask questions. The phone system, website, and/or app interface must be compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act. The toll-free number and website address must be printed on a sticker attached to each scooter.
4.3 Damaged Scooters. In the event a safety or maintenance issue is reported for a specific scooter, that scooter must be made unavailable to riders and must be removed within the timeframe provided herein. Any inoperable or unsafe device must be repaired before it is put back into service.
4.4 Rider Education Plan. Prior to commencing operations hereunder, BIRD is required to submit to CITY, and receive approval from CITY of, a plan demonstrating how BIRD will educate riders regarding the following rules:
a. Applicable state laws and CITY requirements;
b. Pedestrians and bicyclists are to be given the right of way; c. How to safely travel on BIRD scooters (one rider only, at least one hand on handlebars at all times, etc.);
d. All riders must be at least 18 years of age and possess a valid driver’s license; BIRD RIDES, INC. PAGE 4|
e. Helmets are recommended while riding scooters;
f. Scooters are to be ridden on streets, and where available, bike lanes, and bike paths (not on sidewalks);
g. Scooters are to stay to the right of street lanes and to offer the right of way to bicycles on bike lanes and on bike paths;
h. Riding a scooter while impaired is against the law; and i. Proper locations and rules for parking scooters.
4.5 Maintenance Required. BIRD must ensure that all scooters are kept clean and undamaged, except for superficial scrapes or scuff marks or other ordinary wear and tear, and in operable condition. BIRD will establish a method and schedule for providing maintenance of its scooters share its and will share cleaning and maintenance methods and schedules with CITY upon request.
4.6 Damaged Property. BIRD must repair, replace, or otherwise restore, in the discretion of CITY or the other owner of such property, any part or item of real or personal property that is damaged, lost, or destroyed as a result of the operation of BIRD scooters hereunder. In the event that BIRD fails to do so, BIRD agrees to pay CITY’s costs in making such repairs, replacements, or restoration, provided that this provision does not obligate CITY to do so.
4.7 Compliance with Law. BIRD must ensure that its operations, including the operation of scooters by its customers, comply at all times with laws, ordinances, regulations and requirements of government entities applicable to its use of CITY rights-of-way and the operation of its business within the City of Crescent City. BIRD must obtain a business license and mobile vending permit from CITY prior to commencing operations.
4.8 Supervision. BIRD must provide adequate supervision and direction to its employees, contractors and agents that will be working in Crescent City as part of the deployment of the fleet of scooters contemplated under this Agreement.
4.9 Rider Waiver. Each Rider must agree to the following release and waiver (or substantially similar) as part of the scooter rental agreement:
“For and in consideration of rental and use of the scooter, rider, for himself/herself and on behalf of rider’s heirs, executors, administrators and assigns forever releases and relinquishes and discharges the City of Crescent City and its elected and appointed officials, employees, agents, contractors and volunteers (collectively, the “City”) from any and all claims, demands, disputes, losses, liabilities, debts, liens, charges, penalties, proceedings, causes of action and damages including for personal injury, wrongful death, property damage, and injury to rider or to third parties (collectively, “Claims”), including unknown or unanticipated Claims, which arise from or are related directly or indirectly to this agreement or the rental , maintenance, design, placement, use and/or operation of the Operator's equipment, including the scooter, or the Operator's website, including any all claims related to the sole or partial negligence of the City or any other party. Rider hereby expressly waives any Claims against the CITY that rider does not know or suspect to exist in his/her favor at the time of renting a scooter and expressly waiver rider’s right under any statutes that purport to preserve rider’s unknown Claims.”
BIRD RIDES, INC. PAGE 5|
5.0 DATA SHARING
5.1 Trip Data. BIRD agrees to provide CITY with access to an application planning interface (API) offering data about its scooter fleet and trip activity within CITY, meeting the requirements of the Mobility Data Specification format. All rider information must be anonymized, and no personal rider information may be provided or made available to CITY. CITY will have the right, through its representatives and at reasonable times, to review such information during the term of this Agreement, any extension or renewal hereof, and for one year after the termination or expiration of this Agreement. BIRD will also submit monthly summaries of total riders, trip numbers by day and week, trip length and time, and trip origins and destinations.
CITY may use this information provided by BIRD to inform the public regarding the number and general location of BIRD scooter trips taken within CITY.
5.2 Injury Reports. BIRD will provide monthly summaries to CITY describing rider injuries, reported complaints, and responses by BIRD customer service staff. In addition, BIRD will provide notice to CITY of any reported rider injury requiring medical treatment with 5 business days of receiving such report. Upon request, BIRD will provide CITY with copies of all reports of rider injuries and the locations of such injuries.
5.3 Trade Secrets. Except for information furnished pursuant to Section 5.2, all information hosted within the API or retrieved from the API will be deemed a trade secret to the extent permitted by California Government Code 6254(k) and California Evidence Code Section 1060; provided that, if CITY receives a request for such information it must provide notice of such request to BIRD and BIRD may see a protective order or other judicial authority for CITY to refuse to disclose such records, at BIRD’s sole expense. For avoidance of doubt, CITY will not be obligated to engage in litigation to protect information from the API or to otherwise to incur expenses to prevent disclosure of such information.
6.0 INSURANCE
6.1 Insurance Required. BIRD is required to procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement policies of insurance with a carrier authorized to transact business in California and with an A.M. Best’s rating of not less than A:VII, unless otherwise approved by CITY, as set forth below. BIRD may not commence operations under this Agreement until it has secured all required insurance coverage and submitted certificates of insurance to CITY.
6.2 Commercial General Liability Insurance. BIRD must maintain commercial general liability insurance that affords coverage at least as broad as ISO Form CG 0001, or the exact equivalent, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence for bodily injury or property damage, including contractual liability, personal injury and product liability and completed operations, and not less than $5,000,000 in general aggregate for all occurrences during the policy period. CITY must be named as an additional insured on this policy. Defense costs are to be paid in addition to the policy limits. The policy must not contain any endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another, or any other exclusion contrary to the terms of this Agreement.
BIRD RIDES, INC. PAGE 6|
6.3 Automobile Insurance. BIRD must maintain automobile insurance liability coverage with coverage at least as broad as ISO Form CA 0001 covering “Any Auto” (Symbol 1), or the exact equivalent, covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement, including without limitation all activities undertaken by agents or contractors of BIRD, in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each occurrence.
6.4 Workers’ Compensation / Employer’s Liability. BIRD must maintain a workers’ compensation insurance policy as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease. BIRD must require each contractor or subcontractor providing services to BIRD’s operations under this Agreement to maintain such policies of insurance.
6.5 Primary Coverage. For any claims related to this Project, the CONSULTANT'S insurance coverage will be primary insurance as respects CITY, its elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY, its elected and appointed officials, employees, agents or volunteers will be in excess of the CONSULTANT'S insurance and will not contribute with it.
6.6 Waiver of Subrogation. BIRD hereby grants CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said BIRD may acquire against CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. BIRD agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
6.7 Declaration of Self-Insured Retentions and Large Deductibles. Self-insured retentions and deductibles more than $10,000 must be declared to and approved by CITY. CITY may require BIRD to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language must provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY.
6.8 Lack of Coverage. BIRD agrees to suspend and cease all operations hereunder during any period for which any of the required insurance coverage is not in effect. BIRD must immediately provide written notice to CITY if (i) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (ii) the limits of any of the required policies is reduced; or (iii) the deductible is increased.
6.9 Severability of Interests. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that BIRD’s insurance will apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) may not contain any cross-liability exclusions.
6.10 Notice of Claims. BIRD must provide CITY with prompt and timely notice of any claims made or lawsuits initiated that arise out of or result from BIRD’s performance under this Agreement and/or that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.
BIRD RIDES, INC. PAGE 7|
7.0 INDEMNITY.
7.1 Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law, BIRD agrees to defend, indemnify and hold CITY, its elected and appointed officials, employees, contractors, agents and volunteers (“Indemnitees”) free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs , expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of BIRD, its officials, officers, employees agents, and/or riders in connection with BIRD’s exercise of tis rights under this Agreement (including without limitation the operation of BIRDS’s scooter rental business, the use of BIRD scooters by customers or other members of the public, the breach of this Agreement by BIRD, and any violation of applicably law by BIRD or its customers), including without limitation the payment of expert witness fees and attorneys’ fees and other related costs and expenses, except that BIRD’s defense, indemnification and hold harmless obligations will not extend to cover claims that are determined by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction to have been solely caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, or its elected and appointed officials, employees, contractors, agents and volunteers.
7.2 Defense. BIRD agrees to defend, with counsel of CITY’s choosing (provided that (1) such counsel is reasonably acceptable to BIRD and (2) BIRD will have the right, at its expense, to hire its own counsel and participate in the defense) and at BIRD’s own cost, expense and risk, any and all claims, suits, actions of other proceedings of every kind covered by Section 7.1 above that may be brought or instituted against the Indemnitees. BIRD acknowledges and agrees that it has an obligation to defend the Indemnitees from any claim that actually or potentially falls within BIRD’s indemnity obligations under Section 7.1 above, even if the allegations are or may be groundless, false, or fraudulent. BIRD must indemnify the Indemnitees for any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against CITY, its elected or appointed officials, employees, contractors, agents or volunteers as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding for which BIRD is required to indemnify the Indemnitees pursuant to Section 7.1 above. BIRD must reimburse CITY and its elected and appointed officials, employees, contractors, agents and volunteers for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in enforcing BIRD’s indemnity obligations herein provided.
BIRD’s obligation is not limited to insurance proceeds, if any, received by CITY, its elected and appointed officials, employees, contractors, agents, or volunteers.
7.3 Survival. BIRD’s obligations under Sections 7.1 and 7.2 will survive termination or expiration of this Agreement in accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.
8.0 EARLY TERMINATION
8.1 Early Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement if it is determined to be necessary for public health and safety or if the services or operations hereunder become impracticable by providing 30 days’ written notice to the other party.
BIRD RIDES, INC. PAGE 8|
8.2 Removal of Fleet. Within 5 days of the effective date of termination, BIRD must retrieve all of its scooters within CITY. Any scooters not so removed, are subject to impoundment by CITY and the fee set forth in Section 3.4.
9.0 CITY REPRESENTATIVE
After approval of this Agreement, the City Manager will serve as the City’s representative in the administration of this Agreement. The City Manager will have authority to approve all plans required to be submitted, request reports, initiate early termination if warranted, and approve or deny requests from BIRD relating to amending the operating area, number of scooters allowed, etc.
10.0 NOTICES
All notices permitted or required under this Agreement must be given to the respective parties at the following designated address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for that purpose:
IF TO CITY:
City of Crescent City
Attn: City Manager
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
IF TO BIRD:
Bird Rides, Inc.
Attn: Bird Rides Legal Dept.
406 Broadway Ave. #369
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Notice will be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, 48 hours after deposit in the US Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address.
Actual notice will be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.
11.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS
11.1 No Partnership. This Agreement does not create a joint venture, partnership or other business relationship between CITY and BIRD or any of its affiliates.
11.2 Modifications. Any amendment or modification to the terms of this Agreement must be executed by both parties with the same formalities as this original Agreement.
11.3 Successor and Assigns. This Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of CITY and BIRD.
11.4 No Assignment. BIRD may not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of CITY. Any attempt to do so will be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates, or transfers will acquire any right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.
11.5 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third-party beneficiaries for any right or obligation assumed under this Agreement by either CITY or BIRD.
BIRD RIDES, INC. PAGE 9|
11.6 No Waiver. No waiver, express or implied, by CITY of any default or violation of the provisions of this Agreement by BIRD will constitute a waiver of a subsequent default or violation of the same or different provision of this Agreement. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by CITY will give BIRD any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.
11.7 Section Headings. The section headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not to be used in the interpretation of this Agreement.
11.8 Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid unlawful, or otherwise unenforceable, then the remaining provisions of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect.
11.9 Governing Law & Venue. This interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of California. The parties agree that any civil action brought between the parties must be initiated in the Del Norte County Superior Court or the U.S. District Court for Northern California, as applicable.
11.10 Attorney’s Fees. If Either CITY or BIRD commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action will be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
11.11 Integration. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of CITY and BIRD with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understanding or agreements.
11.12 Authority. The signatories hereto represent and warrant they have the lawful authority to execute this Agreement and legally bind their respective parties.
11.13 Digital Signatures. Each party agrees that this Agreement and any other documents to be delivered in connection herewith may be electronically signed, and that any electronic signatures appearing on this Agreement or such other document are the same as handwritten signatures for the purposes of validity, enforceability, and admissibility.
[signature page to follow]
BIRD RIDES, INC. PAGE 10|
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be signed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date last written below.
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY: BIRD RIDES, INC.:
Dated: ____________________________
By: _______________________________
Eric Wier, City Manager
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Robin Patch, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Martha D. Rice, City Attorney
Dated: _______________________________
By: __________________________________
Name: _______________________________
Title: ________________________________
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: RICHARD GRIFFIN, CHIEF OF POLICE
MARTHA D. RICE, CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: APRIL 18, 2022
SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Waive full reading, read by title only and introduce Ordinance No. 830, AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
APPROVING A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY AS REQUIRED BY AB 481
BACKGROUND
Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481), codified at Government Code sections 7070 through 7075 requires a law enforcement agency (LEA) to obtain approval from the applicable governing body, via adoption of a “military equipment” use policy (the Policy) by ordinance (the Ordinance), prior to the LEA funding, acquiring, or using military equipment. The Crescent City Police Department (CCPD) seeks City Council adoption of the attached Military Equipment Use Policy, in order to allow CCPD to continue to use the vital equipment specified therein.
Items deemed to be “military equipment” by AB 481 are used as a component of overall best practices for LEAs throughout the country. These tools have been tested in the field, and are used by LEAs to enhance citizen safety, officer safety. Loss of these items would jeopardize the welfare of citizens and peace officers within the CCPD.
The term “military equipment”, as used in AB 481, in fact does not necessarily indicate equipment that has been used by the military. Pursuant to AB 481, items deemed to be “military equipment” include, but are not limited to, unmanned aerial or ground vehicles,
MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY
APRIL 18, 2022
2 armored vehicles, command and control vehicles, pepper balls, less lethal shotguns, less lethal 40mm projectile launchers, long range acoustic devices, and flashbangs.
CCPD is committed to using the most up to date tools and equipment to safeguard the citizens of Crescent City. Some of items deemed to be “military equipment” by AB 481 are in fact employed by CCPD, and LEA’s across the country, in order to specifically reduce risk to community members. These items provide peace officers with the ability to safely resolve volatile situations which otherwise might rise to the level of a lethal force encounter. To that end, the items at issue in this report, and accompanying Military Equipment Use Policy, also provide CCPD’s peace officers with vital tools that facilitate compliance with its stringent use of force policy.
The policy must addresses the following matters for each type of military equipment:
(1) description, quantity, capabilities, lifespan, and manufacturer product descriptions; (2) the purposes and authorized uses for each type of military equipment; (3) fiscal impact including the initial costs of obtaining the equipment and annual costs of maintenance;
(4) the legal and procedural rules that govern each authorize use; and (5) the training, including any course required by POST, that must be completed before an officer may use each specific type of military equipment.
The policy must also detail the mechanisms to ensure compliance with the policy, including which persons or entities have oversight authority, and, if applicable, what legally enforceable sanctions are put in place for violations of the policy. The policy must also provide procedures by which members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of military equipment, and how the department will ensure that each complaint, concern, or question receives a timely response.
After the policy is adopted, the police department must annually report to the community and the City Council on its use of military equipment in the previous calendar year. The annual report and the military equipment use policy must be made available on the police department’s webpage. The City Council must approve the policy on annual basis by ordinance.
ITEM ANALYSIS
There is significant interest in ensuring that law enforcement continues to have access to equipment that will provide peace officers as many options as possible to safeguard lives, ensure safety, and protect civil liberties. The use of the tools identified below are vital to CCPD’s mission and will continue to be strictly regulated through internal processes and oversight.
The proposed ordinance seeks to approve the CCPD’s Policy 710: Military Equipment, which outlines each item identified in Government Code section 7070, that is currently owned by the City. The policy also includes the current use and cost of each item. These
MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY
APRIL 18, 2022
3 particular items, and their stated uses, have been in place prior to the implementation of AB 481. Future acquisitions of any item deemed to be “military equipment” will require a further public meeting, policy update, and council approval. The proposed ordinance safeguards the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. The ordinance ensures that there are safeguards, including transparency, oversight, and accountability measures in place. There are no reasonable alternatives to the military equipment listed in the policy. CCPD has not discovered alternative items that can achieve the same objectives of officer and civilian safety.
The timeline for adoption of the military equipment use policy is as follows:
1. Introduction of Ord. 830, Military Equipment Use Policy April 18
2. Post CCPD Policy 710 on Police Dept. webpage April 22
3. Publish notice of public hearing in Triplicate April 29
4. Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption June 6
5. Effective Date July 6
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The only fiscal impact of this policy is the staff time put into drafting and reporting in compliance with AB 481 as well as noticing and holding annual community engagement meetings and public hearings.
STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
GOAL 1: Support quality services, community safety, and health to enhance the quality A. Empower and utilize Police, Fire, and Public Works departments to make Crescent City one of the safest cities in the United States GOAL 3: Obtain the highest levels of organizational excellence A. Develop a results-based organization which utilizes community involvement, innovation, transparency, and leadership
ATTACHMENTS
1. Proposed Ordinance No. 830
2. Assembly Bill 481
_____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Crescent City Ordinance No. 830 Page 1 of 11
ORDINANCE NO. 830
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY APPROVING A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY AS REQUIRED BY AB 481 WHEREAS, the City of Crescent City is a general law city incorporated under the laws of State of California in 1854; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 481, signed by the Governor on September 30, 2021, requires the governing bodies of local law enforcement agencies to adopt a military equipment use policy by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 481 requires that the governing body commence this process prior to May 1, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the policy must be reviewed and reauthorized on an annual basis following receipt of a report on the use of military equipment by the law enforcement agency; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the policy is to provide transparency regarding the law enforcement agency’s use of “military equipment”; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 481 requires a 30-day noticing period prior to a public hearing on the policy; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on this ordinance will be held June 6, 2022 and a copy of the policy will be posted on the Crescent City Police Department’s webpage.
NOW, THERFORE, the City Council of the City of Crescent City, State of California, hereby ordains:
SECTION 1. RECITALS. The City Council finds the above recitals to be true and correct and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
SECTION 2. UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE. This ordinance is an uncodified ordinance of the City of Crescent City.
SECTION 3. FINDINGS. The City Council makes the following findings and determinations:
a. The military equipment described in Crescent City Police Department Policy 710 is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.
b. Crescent City Police Department Policy 710 will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.
c. The military equipment identified in Crescent City Police Department Policy 710 is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.
_____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Crescent City Ordinance No. 830 Page 2 of 11
SECTION 4. APPROVAL OF POLICY. The Crescent City Police Department Policy 710: Military Equipment (2022) attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, is hereby approved by the City Council.
SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY. If any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or inapplicable to any situation by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or the applicability of this Ordinance to other situations.
SECTION 6. CEQA FINDINGS. This Ordinance has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the CEQA Guidelines, and has been found to be exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (general rule) of the CEQA Guidelines, because the City Council hereby finds with certainty that there is no possibility the passage of this Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE & PUBLICATION. This Ordinance will become effective 30 days after the date of its adoption. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in Del Norte County once within 15 days of its adoption in accordance with the requirements of Government Code Section 36933.
INTRODUCED at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Crescent City held on April 18, 2022.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Crescent City at a regular meeting of the City Council held this ___ day of _____, 2022 by the following polled vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Jason Greenough, Mayor
ATTEST:
Robin Patch, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Martha D. Rice, City Attorney
_____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Crescent City Ordinance No. 830 Page 3 of 11
CRESCENT CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY 710: MILITARY EQUIPMENT
(2022)
710.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this military equipment policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment. (Gov. Code §§ 7070, 7071, 7072.) Government Code 7070(d)(7) requires that this policy have procedures by which members of the public may register complaints, or concerns or submit questions about the use of military equipment. This information can be found on the department website or by calling and scheduling a telephone appointment with the military equipment coordinator.
Department website: https://www.crescentcity.org/departments/Police AB 481 Military Equipment Transparency
Department telephone number:
1-707-464-2133
710.2 DEFINITION OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT
For purposes of this policy the term “military equipment” includes, but is not limited to the following:
CATEGORY 1: Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.
CATEGORY 2: Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers.
CATEGORY 3: High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-onehalf-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached.
CATEGORY 4: Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants.
CATEGORY 5: Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.
CATEGORY 6: Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.
CATEGORY 7: Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram. _____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Crescent City Ordinance No. 830 Page 4 of 11
CATEGORY 8: Firearms and ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standardissue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
CATEGORY 9: Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.
CATEGORY 10: Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.
CATEGORY 11: Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools.
CATEGORY 12: Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
CATEGORY 13: TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and longrange acoustic devices (LRADs).
CATEGORY 14: Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
CATEGORY 15: Any other equipment as determined by the City Council or a state agency to require additional oversight.
710.3 POLICY
It is the policy of the Crescent City Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Gov. Code § 7071 with respect to the use of military equipment. 710.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police or designee shall act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the City Council for matters related to the requirements of this policy. (b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the department, or the equipment the department intends to acquire that requires approval by the City Council.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Crescent City Police Department. (Gov. Code § 7071.) (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:
1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.
2. Preparing for public questions regarding the Department’s funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
_____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Crescent City Ordinance No. 830 Page 5 of 11
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website. (Gov. Code § 7072.)
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the department will respond in a timely manner.
710.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the department:
1. SPECIALIZED FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION (CATEGORY 9)
(a) Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:
o The Carbine Rifle is a firearm, capable of accurately stopping an armed subject at various distances. The Carbine Rifle is a lightweight, air-cooled, gas operated, magazine fed, shoulder fired weapon, designed for semiautomatic or selective fire.
The Carbine Rifle does not have an expiration and will need to be serviced or replaced when the Rifle fails or breaks. The.223/5.56 cartridge,.308/7.62 cartridge, and the.300 blackout cartridge is used as a lethal option designed to stop violent encounters. The projectile is capable of penetrating soft body armor being worn by armed subjects.
o Colt AR-15/M4 cost: $1,200, quantity: 4, Caliber 5.56MM. Daniel Defense MK18 cost $2,000, quantity 6, caliber 5.56.
o Authorized Make/Model of rifles for individual officer purchase:
▪ .223/5.56 caliber: Daniel Defense - DDM4®V7®, DDM4®V7® PRO GUN METAL GRAY, MK18, M4A1, MK12, DDM4®V7® PRO, DDM4®V9®,
DDM4®V7®SLW, DDM4ISR®, DDM4®V4®S, DDM4®V7®S, DDM4 V5S, or similar models approved by Chief of Police.
▪ .300 blackout caliber: Daniel Defense - DDM4® PDW SBR ▪ .308/7.62 caliber: DPMS - AR-10.308 CALIBER RIFLE, MODEL LR-308, Daniel Defense -DD5®V3® (7.62 X 51MM), DD5®V4® (7.62 X 51MM) o The Winchester 5.56mm 55 grain full metal jacket is the primary duty cartridge deployed during potential lethal encounters. Cost: $2,500 to $3,000 annually, quantity: 3,000-5,000 rounds annually.
o Other brands and calibers also purchased, depending upon market supply/availability:
▪ PMC 223A,.223 Remington 55 grain FMJ-BT
▪ Federal XM193X 55-grain FMJ 5.56x45mm
o .308/7.62 and.300 blackout ammunition would be utilized in individual officer owned rifles and purchased by the officers. This ammunition would be subject to approval of existing CCPD policy.
_____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Crescent City Ordinance No. 830 Page 6 of 11
(b) Purpose: To be used as a precision weapon to address a threat with more precision and/or greater distances than a handgun if present, safe, and feasible. (c) Authorized Use: Only officers that are POST certified and authorized to use a rifle. All other applicable CCPD policies remain in effect, to include, but not limited to, CCPD Policy 301 Use of Force, and CCPD Policy 314 Firearms.
(d) Expected Lifespan: No expiration for Carbine Rifles or ammunition. (e) Fiscal Impact: Carbine Rifle- Annual cost $2,500 and $5,000. New rifle purchase in 2022 expected between $12,000 to $15,000. Rifle Ammunition $2,500-$5,000 annually.
2. TEAR GAS (CATEGORY 12)
(a) Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost: Chemical agent munition, which are commonly referred to as "tear gas," are used by the Crescent City Police Department as a non-lethal tool to disperse rioting suspects and on barricaded suspects.
The Crescent City Police Department uses chemical agents which are used by law enforcement across the United States: CS (2-Chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile) and OC (Oleoresin Capsicum) CS is an irritating agent and lachrymator (irritates the eyes and causes tears to flow) CS has been medically tested in the UK and US, specifically by the U.S. Army. There are no known allergic reactions to CS. OC was de-regulated in California in 1996, is endorsed by the FBI, and is available to civilians to legally possess (2.5 oz or less). OC is an inflammatory agent which causes involuntary closure of eyes (open in 2-5 minutes) and respiratory inflammation (subsides in approximately 2 minutes). o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT OC, #6320, cost: $35, quantity:
20. The 40mm Direct Impact® munition is a point-of-aim, point-of-impact direct-fire round.
An excellent solution whether you need to incapacitate a single subject or control a crowd. When loaded with OC powder, the Direct Impact combines blunt trauma with the effects of an irritant powder, maximizing the potential for incapacitation. The 40mm Direct Impact® munition travels at an average velocity of 305 feet per second (89.9 mps) with an effective range of 5 ft – 120 ft (1.52m – 36.6m). This lightweight, high-speed projectile consists of a plastic body and a crushable foam nose. The orange foam nose indicates that the round contains an OC powder payload. This munition is a point-of-aim, point-of-impact direct fire round which has passed extensive human effects assessments for blunt impact and penetration.
o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT CS, #6322, cost: $35, quantity:
20. The 40mm Direct Impact® munition is a point-of-aim, point-of-impact direct-fire round.
An excellent solution whether you need to incapacitate a single subject or control a crowd. When loaded with CS powder, the Direct Impact combines blunt trauma with the effects of an irritant powder, maximizing the potential for incapacitation. _____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Crescent City Ordinance No. 830 Page 7 of 11
The 40mm Direct Impact® munition travels at an average velocity of 295 feet per second (89.9 mps) with an effective range of 5 ft – 120 ft (1.52m – 36.6m). This lightweight, high-speed projectile consists of a plastic body and a crushable foam nose. The blue foam nose indicates that the round contains a CS powder payload. This munition is a point-of-aim, point-of-impact direct fire round which has passed extensive human effects assessments for blunt impact and penetration. The 40 mm Direct Impact Round is most commonly used by tactical teams in situations where greater accuracy and deliverable energy is desired for the incapacitation of an aggressive, non-compliant subject at longer distances.
o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM POWDER BARRICADE ROUND, OC, #2290, cost:
$35, quantity: 20.
The Ferret® 40 mm Barricade Penetrating Round is filled with an OC powder chemical agent. It is a frangible projectile that is spin stabilized utilizing barrel rifling. It is nonburning and designed to penetrate barriers. Primarily used to dislodge barricaded subjects, it can also be used for area denial. Primarily used by tactical teams, it is designed to penetrate barriers, such as windows, hollow core doors, wallboard and thin plywood. Upon impact the nose ruptures and instantaneously delivers the agent payload inside a structure or vehicle. Effective range of 50 meters. o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, FERRETT 40MM LIQUID BARRICADE PENETRATOR ROUND CS, #2262, cost: $30, quantity: 20.
A less lethal 40MM round used to penetrate barriers, such as windows, hollow core doors, wallboard and thin plywood. Upon impacting the barrier, the nose cone ruptures and instantaneously delivers a small chemical payload inside of a structure or vehicle. In a tactical deployment situation, the 40mm Ferret is primarily used to dislodge barricaded subjects from confined areas. Its purpose is to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort and/or incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects. Effective range of 50 meters.
(b) Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situation for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include but are not limited to:
o Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. o Riot/Crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
o Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. o Potentially vicious animals.
o Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
(c) Authorized Use: Only officers who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. All other applicable CCPD policies remain in effect to include, but not limited to CCPD Policy 301- Use of Force, CCPD Policy 309- Control Devices and Techniques.
(d) Expected Lifespan:
_____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Crescent City Ordinance No. 830 Page 8 of 11
o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT OC, #6320 – 5 years.
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT CS, #6322, – 5 years. o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM POWDER BARRICADE ROUND, OC, #2290, – 5 years.
o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, FERRETT 40MM LIQUID BARRICADE PENETRATOR ROUND CS, #2262 – 5 years.
(e) Fiscal Impact: Total allocated budget $1,000-$2,000 annually.
3. PEPPERBALL LAUNCHER (CATEGORY 12)
(a) Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:
o FTC Launcher System that uses high pressure air to deliver PAVA powder projectiles (similar to a paint ball delivery system). System capable of launching projectiles at a subject up to 150'. Non-lethal option to offer law enforcement officers to deliver chemical agents and kinetic energy impacts to subjects in a potentially violent encounter. This is a de-escalation tool used to avoid further injuries or lethal options to a subject. Cost $500, quantity: 4.
o MISSION TPR ORANGE PEPPER BALL GUN. target accurate up to 60Ft, Area Saturation to 0-175ft. Semi-Automatic 8 rd. magazine, deploys at 300ft. per second.
Cost $350-$400. Quantity: 6.
o PepperBall Live SD Projectiles,.68 Caliber PAVA Powder. This projectile is best for direct impact or area saturation. Discharged form a PepperBall launcher, the projectile has a velocity of 280-425 FPS. The projectile has a direct impact of 60 ft and an area saturation of 150+ft. The projectile contains 2.0% PAVA powder. Cost:
$250 per 90 rounds
(b) Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
o Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. o Riot/Crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
o Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. o Potentially vicious animals.
o Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
(c) Authorized Use: Only those officers who have been trained in the use of the PepperBall launchers are authorized to use the PepperBall launchers. All other applicable CCPD policies remain in effect to include, but not limited to CCPD Policy 301- Use of Force, CCPD Policy 309- Control Devices and Techniques.
(d) Expected Lifespan:
o PepperBall Launcher: No Expiration
o Mission TPR Launcher: No expiration
_____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Crescent City Ordinance No. 830 Page 9 of 11
o LIVE-SD Projectile: 1 year
(e) Fiscal Impact:
o PepperBall FTS Launcher: No fiscal impact or recurring cost o Live SD Projectile: Approximately $0 - $1,000 annually o Mission TPR Launcher: $0 to $400 annually
4. PROJECTILE LAUNCH PLATFORMS AND ASSOCIATED MUNITIONS (CATEGORY 14) (a) Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:
PENN ARMS PGL-65 40 PUMP MULTI-LAUNCHER 5" CYL. FIXED STOCK W/ COMBO RAIL.
A 40mm pump-action advance magazine drum launcher with a fixed stock and combo rail. It has a six-shot capacity and rifled barrel. The features include: Double-action trigger, trigger lock push button and hammer lock safeties. It will fire standard 40mm less lethal ammunition, up to 5 inches in cartridge length. It will launch a 40MM less lethal round and is only authorized to be used by trained personnel. o Remington 870 12 ga Less-Lethal Shotgun: Cost $500-$650, quantity 6 o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT OC, #6320, cost: $35, quantity:
20. o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT CS, #6322, cost: $35, quantity:
20. o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM POWDER BARRICADE ROUND, OC, #2290, cost: $35, quantity: 20.
o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, FERRETT 40MM LIQUID BARRICADE PENETRATOR ROUND CS, #2262, cost: $30, quantity: 20.
o CTS Model 2581 Super Sock Bean Bag 12 ga round - Cost $6 a round, quantity 50- 100 annually
(b) Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable.
(c) Authorized Use: Situations for use of the less lethal weapon system may include, but not limited to:
o Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. o Riot/Crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
o Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. o Potentially vicious animals.
o Training exercised or approved demonstrations.
All other applicable CCPD policies remain in effect, to include, but not limited to, CCPD Policy 301- Use of Force, CCPD Policy 309- Control Devices and Techniques. (d) Expected Lifespan:
o 40 mm Launcher- No expiration
_____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Crescent City Ordinance No. 830 Page 10 of 11
o Remington 870 Bean Bag Less Lethal shotgun- No expiration o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT OC, #6320 – 5 years. o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT CS, #6322, – 5 years. o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM POWDER BARRICADE ROUND, OC, #2290, – 5 years.
o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, FERRETT 40MM LIQUID BARRICADE PENETRATOR ROUND CS, #2262 – 5 years.
o CTS Model 2581 Super Sock- 5 years
(e) Fiscal Impact:
o 40mm Launcher, estimated between $0 - $1000 annually
o Remington 870 less lethal shotgun, estimated between $0 - $1000 annually. o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT OC, #6320, $0 - $250 annually o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT CS, #6322, $0 - $250 annually o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM POWDER BARRICADE ROUND, OC, $0 - $250 annually
o DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, FERRETT 40MM LIQUID BARRICADE PENETRATOR ROUND CS, $0 - $250 annually
o CTS Model 2581, estimated between $0 - $500 annually
710.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the City Council by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment use policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the City Council and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue. (Gov. Code § 7071.) The military equipment use policy must be approved by the City Council prior to engaging in any of the following (Gov. Code § 7071):
a. Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. b. Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
c. Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
d. Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this Department. e. Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the City Council.
f. Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
g. Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. _____________________________________________________________________________________ City of Crescent City Ordinance No. 830 Page 11 of 11
710.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment being used in this jurisdiction by members of the Crescent City Police Department shall comply with the City of Crescent City’s approved military equipment policy.
During times of mutual aid or when utilizing a Regional SWAT Team, allied agencies and their personnel should only use military equipment which is approved for use in the allied agencies’ own military equipment policy. This shall not prevent Crescent City Police Officers who may become members of a Regional SWAT Team from deploying military equipment approved by the Regional SWAT Team for use by Crescent City Police Officers who are assigned to the SWAT Team. Nothing in this policy shall prohibit the use of unapproved military equipment by members of the Crescent City Police Department or its allied agencies during times of exigent circumstances.
710.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the City Council for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use. (Gov. Code § 7072.)
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Gov. Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory.
710.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment
***END POLICY***