FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
h. Travel
Domestic travel costs are allowed under this program, as provided for in this NOFO. International travel is not an allowable cost under this program unless approved in advance by DHS/FEMA.
i. Construction and Renovation
Construction and renovation costs to achieve capability targets related to preventing, preparing for, protecting against, or responding to acts of terrorism are allowed under this program. For construction and renovation costs to be allowed, they must be specifically approved by DHS/FEMA in writing prior to the use of any program funds. Applicants must use the EHP approval process. Limits on the total amount of grant funding that may be used for construction or renovation may apply. Additionally, recipients are required to submit Standard Form 424C. j. Maintenance and Sustainment
Maintenance- and sustainment-related costs, such as maintenance contracts, warranties, repair or replacement costs, upgrades, and user fees, are allowable as described in FP 205-402-125-1, Maintenance Contracts and Warranty Coverage Funded by Preparedness Grants Policy (http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/32474). k. Management and Administration (M&A) Costs
Management and administration (M&A) activities are those directly relating to themanagement and administration of HSGP funds, such as financial management and monitoring. A maximum of up to five percent of HSGP funds awarded may be retained by the state, and any funds retained are to be used solely for M&A purposes associated with the HSGP award.
Subrecipients may also retain a maximum of up to five percent of the funding passed through by the state solely for M&A purposes associated with the HSGP award.
Recipients or subrecipients may apply or credit M&A funding toward the recipient’s requirement to allocate funding toward the four national priority areas. For example, if a recipient spends $5,000 to manage or administer its funding dedicated toward its enhancing cybersecurity investment, the recipient may credit that funding toward its requirement to allocate at least 5 percent of its award to enhancing cybersecurity.
A state’s HSGP funds for M&A calculation purposes includes the total of its SHSP, UASI, and OPSG awards. While the SAA may retain up to five percent of this total for M&A, the state must still ensure that all subrecipient award amounts meet the mandatory minimum passthrough requirements that are applicable to each HSGP program. To meet this requirement, the percentage of SHSP and UASI funds passed through to local or tribal jurisdictions must be based on the state’s total HSGP award prior to withholding any M&A.
In retaining these funds, states may retain a maximum of 2.5 percent of the OPSG allocation, which must be withheld from the pass-through to each subrecipient county or tribe in an equal percentage. The SAA may also retain additional funding from its SHSP award to manage and administer the OPSG award, but that additional amount is also capped at an amount equal to
2.5 percent of the OPSG award. Examples applying this principle:
EXHIBIT FPage 279 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
SAA 1:
SHSP: $1,000,000
OPSG: $2,500,000
UASI: $2,500,000
M&A Maximum: $300,000 (5 percent of $6,000,000)
Maximum M&A for SHSP = $50,000
Maximum M&A for OPSG = $125,000. Of that amount, $62,500 (2.5 percent) may be retained from the OPSG allocation, and the other $62,500 would come from the SHSP allocation. Any amount used to manage and administer OPSG that is charged to SHSP may be above and beyond the $50,000 available to manage the SHSP allocation.
SAA 2:
SHSP: $3,500,000
OPSG: $1,000,000
M&A Maximum: $225,000 (5 percent of $4,500,000)
Maximum M&A for SHSP: $175,000
Maximum M&A for OPSG = $50,000. Of that amount, $25,000 (2.5 percent) may be retained from the OPSG allocation, and the other $25,000 would come from the SHSP allocation. Any amount used to manage and administer OPSG that is charged to SHSP may be above and beyond the $175,000 available to manage the SHSP allocation.
Please note, Information Bulletin (IB) 365: Management and Administration Costs in the Homeland Security and DHS/FEMA Policy 207-087-1, which can be found at http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=7837, do not apply to awards made in FY 2020 under this NOFO. The IB and Policy remain in effect for all previous awards.
L. Critical Emergency Supplies
Critical emergency supplies are allowed under this program.
M. Secure Identification
Secure Identification costs are allowed under this program.
N. Indirect (Facilities & Administrative [F&A]) Costs
Indirect costs are allowable under this program as described in 2 C.F.R. Part 200, including 2 C.F.R. § 200.414. Applicants with a negotiated indirect cost rate agreement that desire to charge indirect costs to an award must provide a copy of their negotiated indirect cost rate agreement at the time of application. Applicants that are not required by 2 C.F.R. Part 200 to have a negotiated indirect cost rate agreement but are required by 2 C.F.R. Part 200 to develop an indirect cost rate proposal must provide a copy of their proposal at the time of application. Post-award requests to charge indirect costs will be considered on a case-by-case basis and based upon the submission of an agreement or proposal as discussed above.
O. General Purpose Equipment
HSGP allows expenditures on general purpose equipment if it aligns to and supports one or more core capabilities identified in the Goal and has a nexus to terrorism preparedness. General purpose equipment, like all equipment funded under the HSGP, must be sharable through the EXHIBIT FPage 280 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC)3 and allowable under 6 U.S.C. § 609, and any other applicable provision of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as amended.
Examples of such general-purpose equipment may include:
• Law enforcement vehicles;
• Emergency medical services (EMS) equipment and vehicles; • Fire service equipment and vehicles, to include hose, pump accessories, and foam concentrate for specialized chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives (CBRNE) response;
• Interoperability of data systems, such as computer aided dispatch (CAD) and record management systems (RMS); and
• Office equipment for staff4 engaged in homeland security program activity.
Equipment allowability is based on the Authorized Equipment List (AEL) but exceptions may be considered on a case-by-case basis if (1) the equipment identified to be purchased directly maps to a core capability contained within the Goal, and (2) the equipment’s purpose (when operational) falls under the permitted use of funds in accordance with 6 U.S.C. § 609, and any other applicable provision of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as amended.
P. Allowable Cost Matrix
The following matrix provides allowable cost activities that fall under each of the cost categories noted above. Recipients and subrecipients must follow all applicable requirements in 2 C.F.R. Part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards). Funds under HSGP may be used to cover the costs for evaluating the impact of these grants on the state or urban area’s core capabilities and capability gaps. This list is not exhaustive, therefore, if there are any questions regarding allowable costs, please contact the appropriate HQ GPD Program Analyst. For additional information on allowable costs, see the Preparedness Grants Manual.
Allowable Program Activities SHSP UASI OPSG
Allowable Planning Costs
Developing hazard/threat-specific annexes Y Y N
Developing and implementing homeland security support programs and adopting ongoing DHS/FEMA nationalinitiatives Y Y N
Developing related terrorism and other catastrophic event prevention activities Y Y N Developing and enhancing plans and protocols Y Y N
Developing or conducting assessments Y Y N
Hiring offull- or part-time staff or contract/consultantsto assist with planning activities Y Y N
Materials required to conduct planning activities Y Y N Travel/per diem related to planning activities Y Y Y
Overtime and backfill costs (in accordance with operational Cost Guidance) Y Y Y Issuance of WHTI-compliant Tribal identification cards Y N N Activitiesto achieve planning inclusive of people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs and limited English proficiency. Y Y N 3 Except for American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, which are not required to belong to EMAC at this time.
4 This applies to all homeland security personnel and is not limited to management and administration staff, and costs are to be captured outside the cap on management and administration costs EXHIBIT FPage 281 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
Allowable Program Activities SHSP UASI OPSG
Coordination with Citizen Corps Councils for public information/education and development of volunteer programs Y Y N
Update governance structures and processes and plans for emergency communications Y Y N Development, and review and revision of continuity of operations plans Y Y N Development, and review and revision of the THIRA/SPR continuity of operations plans Y Y N Allowable Organizational Activities
Note: Personnel hiring, overtime, and backfill expenses are permitted under this grant only to the extent thatsuch expenses are for the allowable activities within the scope of the grant.
Program management Y Y N
Development of whole community partnerships Y Y N
Structures and mechanisms for information sharing between the public and private sector Y Y N
Implementing models, programs, and workforce enhancement initiatives Y Y N Tools,resources, and activitiesthatfacilitate shared situational awareness between the public and private sectors Y Y N
Operational support Y Y N
Utilization of standardized resource management concepts Y Y N Responding to an increase in the threat level under the National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS), or needs in resulting from a National Special Security Event Y Y N Reimbursement for select operational expenses associated with increased security measures at critical infrastructure sites incurred (up to 50 percent of the allocation) Y Y Y Overtime forinformation, investigative, and intelligence sharing activities(up to 50 percent of theallocation) Y Y Y
Hiring of new staff positions/contractors/consultants for participation in information/intelligence analysis and sharing groups orfusion center activities(up to 50 percent of theallocation). Y Y Y
Allowable Equipment Categories
Personal Protective Equipment Y Y Y
Allowable Equipment Categories
Explosive Device Mitigation and Remediation Equipment Y Y N CBRNE Operational Search and Rescue Equipment Y Y N
Information Technology Y Y Y
Cybersecurity Enhancement Equipment Y Y N
Interoperable Communications Equipment Y Y Y
Detection Y Y Y
Decontamination Y Y N
Medical countermeasures Y Y Y
Power (e.g., generators, batteries, power cells) Y Y Y
CBRNE Reference Materials Y Y N
CBRNE Incident Response Vehicles Y Y N
Terrorism Incident Prevention Equipment Y Y Y
Physical Security Enhancement Equipment Y Y Y
Inspection and Screening Systems Y Y Y
Animal Care and Foreign Animal Disease Y Y N
CBRNE Prevention and Response Watercraft Y Y N
CBRNE Prevention and Response Unmanned Aircraft Y Y N
CBRNE Aviation Equipment Y Y N
CBRNE Logistical Support Equipment Y Y N
Intervention Equipment (e.g., tactical entry, crime scene processing) Y Y Y Critical emergency supplies Y Y N
Vehicle acquisition, lease, and rental N N Y
Other Authorized Equipment Y Y Y
EXHIBIT FPage 282 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
Allowable Program Activities SHSP UASI OPSG
Allowable Training Costs
Overtime and backfillfor emergency preparedness and response personnel attending DHS/FEMA-sponsored and approved training classes Y Y N
Overtime and backfill expenses for part-time and volunteer emergency response personnel participating in DHS/FEMA training Y Y N
Training workshops and conferences Y Y Y
Activities to achieve training inclusive of people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs and limited English proficiency Y Y N Full- or part-time staff or contractors/consultants Y Y Y Travel Y Y Y
Supplies Y Y N
Instructor certification/re-certification Y Y N
Coordination with Citizen Corps Councils in conducting training exercises Y Y N Interoperable communications training Y Y N
Activities to achieve planning inclusive of people with limited English proficiency Y Y N Immigration enforcement training Y Y Y
Allowable Exercise Related Costs
Design, Develop, Conduct, and Evaluate an Exercise Y Y N Full- or part-time staff or contractors/consultants Y Y N Overtime and backfill costs, including expenses for part-time and volunteer emergency response personnel participating in DHS/FEMA exercises Y Y N Implementation of HSEEP Y Y N
Activities to achieve exercises inclusive of people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs Y Y N
Travel Y Y N
Supplies Y Y N
Interoperable communications exercises Y Y N
Allowable Exercise Related Costs
Activities to achieve planning inclusive of people with limited English proficiency Y Y N Allowable Management & Administrative Costs
Hiring of full- or part-time staff or contractors/consultants to assist with the management of the respective grant program, application requirements, and compliance with reporting and data collection requirements Y Y Y Development of operating plans for information collection and processing necessary to respond to DHS/FEMA data calls Y Y Y
Overtime and backfill costs Y Y Y
Travel Y Y Y
Meeting related expenses Y Y Y
Authorized office equipment Y Y Y
Recurring expenses such as those associated with cell phones and faxes during the PoP of the grant program Y Y N
Leasing or renting of space for newly hired personnel during the PoP of the grant Program Y Y N
Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Activities (LETPA) Costs Integration and interoperability of systems and data, such as CAD and RMS, to facilitate the collection, Y Y N
Maturation and enhancement of designated state and major Urban Area fusion centers Y Y N
Coordination between fusion centers and other analytical and investigative efforts Y Y N EXHIBIT FPage 283 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
Allowable Program Activities SHSP UASI OPSG
Implementation and maintenance of the Nationwide SAR Initiative Y Y N Implementation of the "If You See Something, Say Something®" campaign Y Y N Increase physical security, through law enforcement personnel and other protective measures, by implementing preventive and protective measures at critical Y Y N Building and sustaining preventive radiological and nuclear detection capabilities Y Y N E. Application Review Information
1. Application Evaluation Criteria
a. Programmatic Criteria
Allocations
Risk Methodology and Effectiveness Review
The risk methodology and effectiveness review first determine the relative risk of terrorism faced by a given area considering the potential risk of terrorism to people, critical infrastructure, and economic security. The analysis includes, but is not limited to, threats from violent domestic extremists, international terrorist groups, and individuals inspired by terrorists abroad.
See the Preparedness Grants Manual and Application Evaluation Criteria for additional information on risk methodology and effectiveness review.
The second part of the risk methodology and effectiveness review determines whether the proposed project is clear, logical, and reasonable to address the priority area of interest and contribute to a culture of national preparedness. This part considers factors such as how well the project is described and how well the project addresses the objectives and strategies of the priority area.
Risk and effectiveness will be given equal consideration in determining final award amounts.
NOTE: The THIRA/SPR process is separate from the risk methodology and effectiveness review, and its results do not affect grant allocations.
Evaluation Criteria
FEMA will evaluate the FY 2020 HSGP applications for completeness, adherence to programmatic guidelines, and anticipated effectiveness of the proposed investments. FEMA’s review will include verification that each IJ or project:
• Meets the national priority required spend percentages. • Aligns with at least one core capability identified in the Goal; • Demonstrates how investments support closing capability gaps or sustaining capabilities identified in the THIRA/SPR process; and
• Supports a NIMS-typed resource and whether those assets are deployable/shareable to support emergency or disaster operations per existing EMAC agreements.
EXHIBIT FPage 284 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
In addition to the above, FEMA will determine whether the proposed approach is clear, logical, and reasonable to address the priority areas of interest and contribute to a culture of national preparedness. This part considers factors such as the objectives and strategies proposed to address the priority area, how the objectives and strategies overcome legal, political, or practical obstacles to reduce overall risk, the process and criteria to select additional relevant projects, and the approach to monitor awards to satisfy the funding percentage allocations. Effectiveness will be evaluated prior to award and may impact the final overall award amount. To that end, IJs should include:
• How the proposed investment addresses the national priority; • An explanation of how the proposed projects were selected and will achieve objectives and strategiesto build orsustain the core capability gapsidentified in the SPR, including expected long-term impact where applicable;
• A summary of laws, policies and practices that can be enhanced, eliminated, or otherwise changed in order to achieve the goals of the project and foster a culture of national preparedness;
• A summary of the collaboration efforts to prevent, prepare for, protect against, and respond to acts of terrorism as well as anticipated outcomes of the project.
For FY 2020 HSGP applications, effectiveness will be evaluated based on the following five factors:
• Investment Strategy (30%): Proposals will be evaluated based on the quality and extent to which applicants describe an effective strategy that demonstrates that proposed projects support the program objective of preventing, preparing for, protecting against, and responding to acts of terrorism, to meet its target capabilities, and otherwise reduce the overall risk to the high-risk urban area, the State, or the Nation.
• Budget (10%): Proposals will be evaluated based on the extent to which applicants describe a budget plan for each investment demonstrating how the applicant will maximize cost effectiveness of grant expenditures.
• Impact/Outcomes (30%): Proposals will be evaluated on how this investment helps the jurisdiction close capability gaps identified in its Stakeholder Preparedness Review and addresses national priorities outlined in the FY 2020 NOFO. Further, proposals will be evaluated on their identification and estimated improvement of core capability(ies), theassociated standardized target(s) that align with their proposed investment, and the ways in which the applicant will measure and/or evaluate improvement. • Collaboration (30%): Proposals will be evaluated based on the degree to which the proposal adequately details how the recipient will use investments and other means to overcome existing logistical, technological, legal, policy, and other impediments to collaborating, networking, sharing information, cooperating, and fostering a culture of national preparedness with federal, state, tribal, and local governments, as well as other regional and nonprofit partners in efforts to prevent, prepare for, protect against, and respond to acts of terrorism, to meet its target capabilities, support the national security mission of DHS and other federal agencies, and to otherwise reduce the overall risk to the high-risk urban area, the State, or the Nation. In evaluating applicants under this factor FEMA will consider the information provided by the applicant and may also consider relevant information from other sources. • Past Performance (additional consideration): Proposals will be evaluated based on the EXHIBIT FPage 285 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
applicants demonstrated capability to execute the proposed investments. In evaluating applicants under this factor FEMA will consider the information provided by the applicant and may also consider relevant information from other sources.
Recipients are expected to conform, as applicable, with accepted engineering practices, established codes, standards, modeling techniques, and best practices, and participate in the development of case studies demonstrating the effective use of grant funds, as requested.
Review and Selection Process (SHSP and UASI)
To ensure the effectiveness of proposed investments and projects, all applications will undergo a Federal review as described herein. The Federal review will be conducted by DHS and FEMA. IJs will be reviewed at both the investment and project level. Results of the effectiveness analysis may result in a recipient receiving a reduced grant award.
Cybersecurity investments will be reviewed by DHS/FEMA, CISA, and other DHS components as appropriate, for compliance with purposes and requirements of the priority investment area. Proposed investments will be reviewed for effectiveness using the criteria set forth in this NOFO.
Soft Targets/Crowded Places investments will be reviewed by DHS/FEMA, CISA, and other DHS components as appropriate, for compliance with purposes and requirements of the priority investment area. Proposed investments will be reviewed for effectiveness using the criteria set forth in this NOFO.
Information Sharing and Cooperation Investments will be reviewed by DHS/FEMA, DHS Intelligence and Analysis, and other DHS components as appropriate, for compliance with purposes and requirements of the priority investment area. Proposed investments will be reviewed for effectiveness using the criteria set forth in this NOFO.
As part of the above, Fusion center projects will be reviewed by DHS/FEMA for compliance with HSGP NOFO requirements to prioritize the alignment of requests with results from the annual Fusion Center Assessment Program. If a fusion center investment does not meet the requirements, a Fusion Center Addendum must be completed and submitted for review and approval prior to expending funds allocated to fusion center activities.
Emerging threats investments will be reviewed by DHS/FEMA, DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office, and other DHS components as appropriate, for compliance with purposes and requirements of the priority investment area. Proposed investments will be reviewed for effectiveness using the criteria set forth in this NOFO.
All other proposed investments not associated with a required investment justification will undergo a Federal review by DHS/FEMA to verify compliance with all administrative and eligibility criteria identified in the NOFO.
Review and Selection Process (OPSG)
Applications will be reviewed by the SAA and USBP for completeness and adherence to programmatic guidelines and evaluated for anticipated feasibility, need, and impact of the EXHIBIT FPage 286 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
Operations Orders. For more information on Operations Orders and other requirements of OPSG, see the Preparedness Grants Manual.
DHS/FEMA will verify compliance with all administrative and eligibility criteria identified in the NOFO and required submission of Operations Orders and Inventory of Operations Orders by the established due dates. DHS/FEMA and USBP will use the results of both the risk analysis and the Federal review by DHS/FEMA to make recommendations for funding to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
FY 2020 OPSG funds will be allocated competitively based on risk-based prioritization using the OPSG Risk Assessment described above. Final funding allocations are determined by the Secretary, who may consider information and input from various law enforcement offices or subject-matter experts within the Department. Factors considered include, but are not limited to, threat, vulnerability, miles of the border, and other border-specific law enforcement intelligence, as well as the feasibility of FY 2020 Operations Orders to designated localities within border states and territories.
b. Financial Integrity Criteria
Prior to making a Federal award, DHS/FEMA is required by 31 U.S.C. § 3321 note, 41 U.S.C. § 2313, and 2 C.F.R. § 200.205 to review information available through any OMBdesignated repositories of government-wide eligibility qualification or financial integrity information. Application evaluation criteria may include the following risk-based considerations of the applicant:
• Financial stability;
• Quality of management systems and ability to meet management standards; • History of performance in managing Federal awards;
• Reports and findings from audits; and
• Ability to effectively implement statutory, regulatory, or other requirements. c. Supplemental Financial Integrity Review
Prior to making a Federal award where the anticipated Federal share of a Federal award will be greater than the simplified acquisition threshold, currently $250,000 (see Section 805 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, Pub. L. No. 115-91, OMB Memorandum M-18-18 at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/M-18-
18.pdf; see also FEMA GPD Information Bulletin No. 434, Increases and Changes to the MicroPurchase and Simplified Acquisition Thresholds):
• DHS/FEMA is required to review and consider any information about the applicant in the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (SAM), which is currently the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) and is also accessible through the SAMwebsite. • An applicant, at its option, may review information in FAPIIS and comment on any information about itself that a Federal awarding agency previously entered. • DHS/FEMA will consider any comments by the applicant, in addition to the other information in FAPIIS, in making a judgment about the applicant’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards when completing the review of risk posed by applicants, as described in 2 C.F.R. § 200.205.
EXHIBIT FPage 287 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
F. Federal Award Administration Information
1. Notice of Award
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on Notice of Award.
2. SHSP and UASI Pass-Through Requirements
Awards made to the SAA for HSGP carry additional pass-through requirements. Pass-through is defined as an obligation on the part of the SAA to make funds available to local units of government, combinations of local units, tribal governments, or other specific groups or organizations. Four requirements must be met to pass-through grant funds:
• The SAA must make a firm written commitment to passing through grant funds to subrecipients;
• The SAA’s commitment must be unconditional (i.e., no contingencies for the availability of SAA funds);
• There must be documentary evidence (i.e., award document, terms, and conditions) of the commitment; and
• The award terms must be communicated to the subrecipient.
Timing and Amount
The SAA must pass-through at least 80 percent of the funds awarded under the SHSP and UASI to local or tribal units of government within 45 calendar days of receipt of the funds. “Receipt of the funds” occurs either when the SAA accepts the award or 15 calendar days after the SAA receives notice of the award, whichever is earlier.
SAAs are sent notification of HSGP awards via the GPD’s ND Grants system. If an SAA accepts its award within 15 calendar days of receiving notice of the award in the ND Grants system, the 45-calendar days pass-through period will start on the date the SAA accepted the award. Should an SAA not accept the HSGP award within 15 calendar days of receiving notice of the award in the ND Grants system, the 45-calendar days pass-through period will begin 15 calendar days after the award notification is sent to the SAA via the ND Grants system.
It is important to note that the PoP start date does not directly affect the start of the 45-calendar days pass-through period. For example, an SAA may receive notice of the HSGP award on August 20, 2020, while the PoP dates for that award are September 1, 2020, through August 31, 2022. In this example, the 45-day pass-through period will begin on the date the SAA accepts the HSGP award or September 4, 2020 (15 calendar days after the SAA was notified of the award), whichever date occurs first. The PoP start date of September 1, 2020 would not affect the timing of meeting the 45-calendar day pass-through requirement.
Other SHSP and UASI Pass-Through Requirements
The signatory authority of the SAA must certify in writing to DHS/FEMA that pass-through requirements have been met. A letter of intent (or equivalent) to distribute funds is not considered sufficient. The pass-through requirement does not apply to SHSP awards made to the District of Columbia, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is required to comply with the pass-through requirement, and its SAA must also obligate at least 80 percent of the funds to local units of government within 45 calendar days of receipt of the funds.
EXHIBIT FPage 288 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
Under SHSP, the SAA may retain more than 20 percent of funding for expenditures made by the state on behalf of the local unit(s) of government. This may occur only with the written consent of the local unit of government, specifying the amount of funds to be retained and the intended use of funds. States shall review their written consent agreements yearly and ensure that they are still valid. If a written consent agreement is already in place from previous fiscal years, DHS/FEMA will continue to recognize it for FY 2020, unless the written consent review indicates the local government is no longer in agreement. If modifications to the existing agreement are necessary, the SAA should contact their assigned FEMA HQ Program Analyst.
Additional OPSG Requirements
The recipient is prohibited from obligating or expending funds provided through this award until each unique and specific county-level or equivalent Operational Order/Fragmentary Operations Order budget has been reviewed and approved through an official electronic mail notice issued by DHS/FEMA removing this special programmatic condition.
3. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on Administrative and National Policy requirements.
4. Reporting
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on reporting requirements, including federal financial reporting requirements, programmatic performance reporting requirements, and closeout reporting requirements.
Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) and Stakeholder Preparedness Review (SPR) Process
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on the THIRA and SPR process.
Supplemental Information Reporting Systems
In addition to ND Grants, the following information systems are used for the submission of required reports:
Grant Reporting Tool (GRT)
Information on the GRT can be found in the Preparedness Grants Manual.
Unified Reporting Tool (URT)
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on the URT.
Closeout Reporting Requirements
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on closeout reporting requirements.
Disclosing Information per 2 C.F.R. § 180.335
See the Preparedness Grants Manual for information on disclosing information.
5. Monitoring
Per 2 C.F.R. § 200.336, DHS/FEMA through its authorized representatives, has the right, at all reasonable times, to make site visits to review project accomplishments and management control EXHIBIT FPage 289 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
systems to review project accomplishments and to provide any required technical assistance. During site visits, DHS/FEMA will review grant recipients’ files related to the grant award. As part of any monitoring and program evaluation activities, grant recipients must permit DHS/FEMA, upon reasonable notice, to review grant-related records and to interview the organization’s staff and contractors regarding the program. Recipients must respond in a timely and accurate manner to DHS/FEMA requests for information relating to the grant program. See the Preparedness Grants Manual for additional information on monitoring.
G. DHS/FEMA Awarding Agency Contact Information
1. Contact and Resource Information
Centralized Scheduling and Information Desk (CSID)
CSID is a non-emergency comprehensive management and information resource developed by DHS/FEMA for grant stakeholders. CSID provides general information on all DHS/FEMA grant programs and maintains a comprehensive database containing key personnel contact information at the Federal, state, and local levels. When necessary, recipients will be directed to a Federal point of contact who can answer specific programmatic questions or concerns. CSID can be reached by phone at (800) 368-6498 or by e-mail at [email protected], Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. ET.
GPD Grant Operations Division
GPD’s Grant Operations Division Business Office provides support regarding financial matters and budgetary, technical assistance. Additional guidance and information can be obtained by contacting the FEMA Call Center at 866-927-5646 or via e-mail to [email protected].
FEMA Regional Offices
FEMA Regional Offices may also provide fiscal support, including pre- and post-award administration and technical assistance such as conducting cash analysis, financial monitoring, and audit resolution for the grant programs included in this solicitation. GPD will provide programmatic support and technical assistance. FEMA Regional Office contact information is available here.
GPD Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) The DHS/FEMA GPD EHP Team provides guidance and information about the EHP review process to recipients and subrecipients. All inquiries and communications about GPD projects or the EHP review process, including the submittal of EHP review materials, should be sent to [email protected]. EHP Technical Assistance, including the EHP Screening Form, can be found online at https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/90195.
2. Systems Information
Grants.gov
For technical assistance with Grants.gov, call the customer support hotline 24 hours per day, 7 days per week (except Federal holidays) at (800) 518-4726 or e-mail at [email protected].
Non-Disaster (ND) Grants
For technical assistance with the ND Grants system, please contact the ND Grants Helpdesk at EXHIBIT FPage 290 of 320
FY 2020 HSGP NOFO
[email protected] or (800) 865-4076, Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. ET.
Payment and Reporting System (PARS)
DHS/FEMA uses the Payment and Reporting System (PARS) for financial reporting, invoicing and tracking payments. DHS/FEMA uses the Direct Deposit/Electronic Funds Transfer (DD/EFT) method of payment to recipients. To enroll in the DD/EFT, recipients must complete a Standard Form 119A, Direct Deposit Form.
H. Additional Information
GPD has developed the Preparedness Grants Manual to guide applicants and recipients of grant funding on how to manage their grants and other resources. Recipients seeking guidance on policies and procedures for managing preparedness grants should reference the Manual for further information. Examples of information contained in the Preparedness Grants Manual include:
• Conflicts of Interest in the Administration of Federal Awards and Subawards; • Extensions;
• Monitoring;
• Procurement Integrity; and
• Other Post-Award Requirements.
In response to recent disasters, FEMA has introduced a new lifelines construct, in order to enable the continuous operation of government functions and critical business essential to human health, safety, or economic security during and after a disaster. To learn more about lifelines, please refer to the Preparedness Grants Manual, or visit http://www.fema.gov/nationalplanning-frameworks.
Additionally, recipients can access the DHS Strategic Framework for Countering Terrorism and Targeted Violence which explains how the department will use the tools and expertise that have protected and strengthened the country from foreign terrorist organizations to address the evolving challenges of today.
EXHIBIT FPage 291 of 320
3. Taxpayer ID #:
2. Mailing Address (please let us know where you want your check delivered, including attention line if necessary):
No Yes
(attach State
Approval)
If Competitive,
indicate the # of
bids.
Non-Competitive
Bid Sole Source
8. TOTAL
I certify that (please use the checkbox):
3. 4.
5. AUTHORIZED CONTACT INFORMATION (If different from Section B):
PHONE #
E-MAIL:
Revised on December 2019
NOTE: This Form is intended for Internal SSD review purpose only.
AUTHORIZED PRINTED NAME AUTHORIZED TITLE
ASSIGNED INVOICE NO.:
2. All instructions for this form were followed and all the supporting documentation (per instructions) is included with this claim.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE
$ -
SECTION D: SUB-RECIPIENT'S CERTIFICATION SECTION E: FOR SSD USE ONLY
1. I am the duly authorized officer of the claimant herein and this claim is in all respect true and correct. All expenditures were made in accordance with applicable laws, rules, regulations and grant conditions and assurances.
STAMP WITH RECEIVED DATE HERE:
7.CLAIM
AMOUNT
(indicate the
amount per each
line)
SECTION C: DETAIL PAYMENT REQUEST INFORMATION
1. SOLUTION AREA
(e.g. equipment, training,
planning, exercise, organization)
2. PROJECT #
(e.g. 011.22)
4. EHP required?
(Environmental & Historic
Preservation)
5. VENDOR'S INVOICE #
(Maximum of 5 invoices)
6. PURCHASE METHOD
(including Training)
4. Contact's e-mail:
4. Contact's phone:
1. Sub-recipient's Name: (reimbursement check will be made payable to a payee entered here)
4. Contact's Name:
Please submit Grant Payment Request Form along with legible supporting documents to: 1. Grant Name & Year:
[email protected]
In the event e-mail is not available, you can mail your Grant payment request to (please do not fax or send duplicates):
Department of Auditor-Controller
Shared Services Division / Attn: Grants Unit
LOS ANGELES COUNTY/DEPARTMENT OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
SHARED SERVICES DIVISION
GRANT PAYMENT REQUEST
SECTION A: SUBMITTING YOUR REQUEST
3470 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 812
Los Angeles, CA 90010
SECTION B: SUB-RECIPIENT'S INFORMATION
EXHIBIT G Page 1 of 14 Page 292 of 320
Purpose of these instructions:
The following numerals provide the instructions to fill in the corresponding numeral in the form:
1. 2.
3. 4.
The following numerals provide the instructions to fill in the corresponding numeral in the form:
1. 2.
4. a)
Ensuring that all documents attached to your Grant payment requests are legible.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER / SHARED SERVICES DIVISION
INSTRUCTIONS TO COMPLETE THE GRANT PAYMENT REQUEST
To assist sub-recipients in completing the Grant Payment Request. We appreciate your participation in this program, for questions or suggestions please use our e-mail below to contact us. Please do not send these instructions to us, they are to be used for your guidance only.
SECTION A: GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF GRANT PAYMENT REQUEST In numeral 1 of this section, please enter the name and year of the grant program that you are submitting for payment. In addition, please help us expedite the process of your Homeland Security claims by:
Completing the Grant payment request correctly and according to these instructions.
Submitting your Grant payment request using our e-mail --> [email protected] (please do not fax documents).
Sending your Grant payment request only once (we do not require original documents and duplicates will slow down our process).
Using the checkboxes to ensure all the required supporting documents and files accompany your Grant payment request. Supporting documents are flagged for your convenience with a checkbox within the corresponding areas.
Submitting Grant payment request timely. We do not guarantee the process of Grant payment requests that are submitted late or too close to the final due date. Reimbursable expenditures need to be charged within the performance period of the grant and submitted to us as soon as they are incurred.
SECTION B: SUB-RECIPIENT'S INFORMATION
Please enter the name of the agency requesting for payment. The name of the agency should be typed according to its signed agreement and as you need it to appear in the payee line of the reimbursement check.
Please enter the complete address (street number and name, city, zip code) and attention line where you will need to receive the reimbursement check. Please note that this is not necessary for L.A. County departments.
Please enter the tax ID of the governmental entity requesting payment. Please leave blank for L.A. County departments.
Please enter the information of the person that can assist us with detail claim questions.
SECTION C: DETAIL PAYMENT REQUEST INFORMATION:
In order to expedite your Grant payment request, in this area's grid, include a maximum of five (5) invoices or reimbursements charges (one charge or one invoice per line). The invoices or charges need to share the same solution area, project #.
Enter the solution area corresponding to the claim. This information is found in the latest budget of the grant. Examples of solution areas are:
equipment, training, planning or exercise.
Enter the project # corresponding to the claim. This information is found in the latest budget of the grant. An example of Item # is 17.020.
Check with an X under either yes or no according to the claim's Environmental & Historical Preservation (EHP) requirements from the State. EHP approval needs to be obtained from the State prior to the start of the project on certain equipment items (see AEL description) or training/exercise projects. Please attach the following:
State EHP Approval: if required by the state for your claim.
Revised on 11/20/2017
EXHIBIT G Page 2 of 14 Page 293 of 320
5. a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
6. a)
b)
c)
7. 8.
SECTION D: SUB-RECIPIENT'S CERTIFICATION
The following numerals provide the instructions to fill in the corresponding numeral in the form:
1. 2.
3. 4 &
5. SECTION C: (Continued)
If the expenditures that you are claiming were purchased thru a vendor or contractor, please enter the invoice # in the grid area. Please note that you are responsible for following acceptable purchasing policies and for documenting your procurement process. Additionally please include the following documentation with your claim:
Copy of the invoice: Please attach an invoice that provides sufficient information to be used as a cross reference with the items described in your grant line item and AEL #. When the invoice includes items that are not being claimed or that belong to different claims or grants, please circle and designate on the invoice the items that you are requesting for reimbursement. Each item circled must have a project #, a funding source, and a total. Purchase orders and price quotes will not be accepted in the place of the invoice.
Copy of the purchase order
Print out of the corresponding AEL # (Authorized Equipment List number). The AEL listing can be found at:
https://www.rkb.us/fema_grants.cfm
Proof of payment of the invoice: The proof of payment for L.A. County Departments is the printout from e-CAPS showing that the check cleared the bank. The proof of payment for other than L.A. County Department is the corresponding copy of the bank's cleared check .
Calculations for use tax paid: When use tax is paid, clearly show the calculations of the use tax in the invoice included in your claim.
Proof of payment of the use tax: Please provide official documents which authenticate the remittance of the use tax to the state, the amount and the reference to the invoice being claimed.
Federal Debarment Listing: Please provide a screen print out of the queried Federal Debarment Listing at http://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM. (you will need a username and a password; if you don't please create an account) . The listing needs to be queried prior to the selection of the vendor.
If you are claiming services, supplies, training related costs, or any other type of items purchased thru a vendor or contractor or government agency, please indicate with an X the method that you used to acquire the items (do not leave blank or mark more than one). Please note that competitive bid, non-competitive bid or sole source are the only valid purchasing methods.
Competitive Bid: for projects that received more than one bid. Please indicate number of bids received (must be more than one).
Non-Competitive Bid: for single bid purchases of $250,000 or more (effective June 21, 2018) to a single vendor or a single project, please attach the approval from the State. The approval needs to be requested from the State prior to the start of the project.
Sole Source: for non-bid purchases of $250,000 or more effective (June 21, 2018) to a single vendor or a single project, please attach the approval from the State. The approval needs to be requested from the State prior to the start of the project.
Enter the amount of your claim after you verify that your budget is sufficient to cover your request. When the amount of the budget is not sufficient, please let your Program Coordinator know of the possible need for budget modification.
Enter the "Total Amount" by adding the subtotal claims included in each line.
Please read and check the box provided if you are an authorized signor.
Please read and check the box provided if you are an authorized signor.
Please sign the Grant payment request if you are an authorized signor of your agency.
When the authorized person is the same as the contact person in Section B you do not need to enter the authorized contact information. If the authorized person and the contact person in Section B are different, please enter all the fields in this area as requested.
Revised on 11/20/2017
EXHIBIT G Page 3 of 14 Page 294 of 320
a)
For Training Claims:
a)
b)
c)
If you are including personnel cost with your training claim, please add the following:
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
ADDITIONAL ITEMS THAT YOU NEED TO ATTACH TO YOUR GRANT PAYMENT REQUEST:
For Equipment Claims:
Equipment Inventory Listing (Print out & Excel File): Please include both the printout of the listing and the corresponding excel file with your claim. The excel file is used to submit your claim with the state and the printout as backup document for audits. If there is no serial # for your equipment please assign a valid ID tag, or write "Consumable" (if it applies) or write N/A. please do NOT leave the corresponding space blank. *1Please refer to the Instructions to Equip Inty Tab for completion procedures of Equipment Inventory.
Additionally, please enter the appropriate CBRNE Mission (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, or Explosive) in the column titled "Equipment Description & Quantity". This only applies to vehicles with AEL # 12VE-00-MISS (Vehicle Specialized Mission:CBRNE).
You need to inform us of any changes on the items above *1. This applies to each piece of equipment added in the Inventory Listing, including when the items are disposed and/or no longer useful. We will update the master inventory listing (per grant requirement) according to the information you give us. Please make sure that you include all the attachments that are necessary to provide us with the requested information.
State Sole Source Approval: If you are claiming training related costs thru a Non-Competitive Bid or Sole Source training provider, regardless the purchased amount, please attach the State's approval (effective December 03, 2018). The approval needs to be requested from the State prior to the start of the project.
State-Sponsored Training Reporting Form (with the tracking request #): Please add this form along with the Training Request Form Training Officer (POC), which you completed at the website, to the claim's backup documentation. All the backup documentation submitted for the training claim needs to agree with the training period and the detail description on the Training Reporting Form and the line item of the Grant. Training request #'s must be obtained from the State prior to the start of the project.
Receipts and paid invoices: please include the complete copy of the receipts and paid invoices with your claim for itemized costs such as air plane tickets, hotel stays, instructor's fees, workshop cost, facilities fees, consulting services, etc. Additionally, you will need to include the documents requested in numeral 5 under Section C.
Personnel List (Print out & Excel File): Please include both the printout of the listing and the corresponding excel file with your claim. The excel file is used to submit your claim with the state and the printout as backup document for audits.
Documents that certify completion of the training: please attach supporting documents that show the class name, dates of training, # of hours of the training class, printed name and signature of individual taking the class and approval signature from supervisor or trainer (attach the information for backfilled positions also). Examples of documents that certify completion of training are:
Attendance sheets (signed by employee and instructor)
Sign in sheets (same as above) Signed training certificates Summary Listing of Charges: Please use the Training Summary Sheet form provided in this claim packet that clearly shows the breakdown of the training charges per employee and that match the total claimed. This form includes the following: employee name, assignment, job title, date, salary, hours claimed, regular rate, overtime rate, employee benefits rate, claim amount per employee, clear calculations of amount claimed per employee and total (equal to the amount claimed).
Please ensure that the Training Summary Sheet is verified/approved by an authorized signatory, with printed name and title, and dated.
Backup for the Benefits Rate: If you are adding benefits to your claim, please make sure that you include the official calculation for the rate used.
Timecards: Include a printout of the corresponding timecards. Manual timecards need to indicate the # of hours charged per day to the grant, supervisor's signature, employee name and signature. Automatic system generated timecards need to be approved and include the name of the employee and hours charged per day to the grant.
Explanation of timekeeping codes: When the supporting documentation (timesheet, payroll register, etc.) includes timekeeping codes please provide a printout with the explanation of the usage as detailed as possible.
Revised on 11/20/2017
EXHIBIT G Page 4 of 14 Page 295 of 320
j)
k)
For Planning Claims:
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
Deliverable (or final product): Please include with your claim the final product of the planning activity (deliverable) that was identified in the grant award.
Payroll register: The payroll register needs to clearly support and explain the amount claimed per employee. It also needs to show the salary, hourly rate, employee benefits and overtime rate.
Roster of backfilled positions: When you are claiming overtime for a backfilled position, please attach the backfilled roster to your claim.
The roster needs to include the name of the backfilling employees, a short description of duties performed, the corresponding employee whose duties were covered and the dates accordingly. Please make sure that the roster is signed and that you include documentation corresponding to the employee covered by the backfilling position.
Signed Certificate of Completion: The certificate of completion can be an e-mail confirming that the planning activity was completed.
Invoices: If your planning claim includes charges invoiced by vendors, please see requirements and documents you need to attach to your claim form under Section C (numeral 5 and numeral 6).
Supporting Documentation for Personnel Cost: When your planning claim includes personnel cost, please see d) to i) under Training Claim (supporting documents needed) and add to the documentation.
For Exercise Claims:
Proof of State Approval of After Action Report (AAR): In order for your AAR to be approved you have to submit it to the State using the ODP Portal (see link below), within 90 days after completion of the exercise. You need to notify the State when the AAR is uploaded so they can proceed with the approval process.
https://hseep.dhs.gov/DHS_SSO/
Invoices: If your exercise claim includes charges invoiced by vendors please see requirements and documents you need to attach to your claim form under Section C (numeral 5 and numeral 6).
Supporting Documentation for Personnel Cost: When your exercise claim includes personnel cost, please see d) to i) under Training Claim (supporting documents needed) and add to the documentation.
For Organization Claims: Please see above b) and c) under Exercise Claims Revised on 11/20/2017
EXHIBIT G Page 5 of 14 Page 296 of 320
GRANT NAME:
SUB-RECIPIENT: __________________________________________ P. ___ of ___ DATE OF REPORT: ______________________________________
Grant Project AEL Description of Property Serial # or SAFECOM Source of Department Vendor Invoice % of FED Location Use & Condition Year Number No. Other ID # Consult
(Yes/No/NA)
Property
(SHSP or
EMPG Grant
Program)
(Title Holder) Name Number Date Cost Participation (N=New, D=Deployed,
O=Out of
Service, L=Lost,
Date Sale Price
N:Grants/Subrecipient Monitoring/Forms/Propery & Equipment Inventory Listing Revised 12/2019
GRANT PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT INVENTORY LISTING
Acquisition Disposition
EXHIBIT G Page 6 of 14 Page 297 of 320
OBJECTIVE: To provide an equipment inventory listing that links the State Homeland Security Workbook, to the Equipment Ledger and to the Equipment Listing to simplify the tracking and accountability; and to Field Date Element
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) Grant Year
(5) Project #
(7) AEL No.
(8) Description
(9) Serial # or Other ID #
(10) Safecom consult
(11) Source of Property
(12) Title Holder
(13) Vendor Name
(14) Invoice Number
(15) Acquisition Date
(16) Acquisition Cost
(17) % of Fed Part
(18) Location
(19) Use & Condition
(20) Disposition data
(21) Sale Price
of the form.
Note {1}:
taken and the results reconciled with the equipment records (at least {2} Indicate: N = New, D = Deployed, O = Out of Service, L = Lost & S = Stolen Project Number (from Grant Workbook Project Sheets)
Equipment Inventory Listing
Procedures for Completion
eliminate duplication and confusion.
Procedure
Grant Name SHSP or EMPG
Sub-Recipient Name of your agency
Date of Report Date report completed {1}
Grant Year of funds used to purchase equipment
Fed participation in the cost of equipment
Authorized Equip Listing No (from Grant Workbook)
Description of the equipment
Serial # or Other identification # used
Fill out either by Yes, No, or N/A
Funding source, i.e, SHSP, EMPG, etc.
Name of agency (City/Department)
Name of the vendor
Invoice number
Date equipment acquired
Cost of the individual equipment item
once every two years).
Distribution
Copy maintained in sub-recipient file
Copy forwarded to Shared Services Division
Location of equipment
Use & condition {2}
Date of disposition
Sale price, If applicable, or N/A for not applicable
The Equipment Inventory Listing must be completed in its entirety to meet the objective This date should be the date the physical inventory of equipment was EXHIBIT G Page 7 of 14 Page 298 of 320
Grant Name
Jurisdiction Name:
Training Provider:
OHS Approved Course Title:
Non-SLGCP Course Title & OHS Tracking No.
(requires pre-approval thru OEM)
Date of Course:
Class/ Exercise Duration/Hours:
EMP NO. EMPLOYEE NAME ASSIGNMENT TITLE
TRAINING
REQUEST #
TRAINING
START DATE
TRAINING END
DATE
SALARY OT REG RATE OT RATE OT PAY
Are you
claiming
for
Employee
Benefits?
Employee
Benefits Rate CLAIM
(for Training only) HOURS TOTAL
1 $ - $ - $ -
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 GRAND TOTAL $ -
Approved by:
Authorized Signature
Print Name and Title Date
Training Summary
Sheet
EXHIBIT G Page 8 of 14 Page 299 of 320
- -
GRAND TOTAL $
Approved by:
Authorized Signature
Print Name and Title Date
Final Product
CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES (Cal OES)
PLANNING ROSTER
Project Planning Activity Solution Area
Sub-Category Discipline Funding Source Total Cost Total Claimed Cash Request Number FMFW v1.09- 06/09
EXHIBIT G Page 9 of 14 Page 300 of 320
- -
GRAND TOTAL $
Approved by:
Authorized Signature
Print Name and Title Date
CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES (Cal OES)
EXERCISE ROSTER
Project Exercise Title Funding Source Solution Area
Sub-Category Discipline Cash Request Number Total Cost Total Claimed Conducted By Date of Exercise Exercise Type Exercise Role Date AAR entered into HSEEP FMFW v1.09- 06/09
EXHIBIT G Page 10 of 14 Page 301 of 320
8. Notes on Personnel Cost:
In general, costs associated with:
Work performed under contract for a specific deliverable DOES NOT count against the personnel cap, however,
Work performed under contract for an undefined period, such as for personnel costs supporting operational activities, including general planning, training or exercise activities DO count against the personnel cap; and
Work performed by all non-contractor personnel, including for full- or part-time staff and operational overtime DO count against the personnel cap.
The following examples would not count towards the personnel cap:
Vendor installation of a radio tower;
Vendor training on new equipment purchased;
Contractor hired to create an Emergency Operations Plan; Contractor hired to provide deliveries of ICS 400; and Contractor hired to assist with planning, training, evaluating, and reporting the effectiveness of a specific exercise.
The following examples would count towards the personnel cap:
Contractor hired to be the State’s WMD training instructor with no specific deliverables under contract;
Contractor hired to facilitate unidentified number of exercises throughout the performance period;
Contractor hired to be the part-time auditor of Homeland Security Grants throughout the year; and Contractor hired to be an intelligence analyst.
EXHIBIT G Page 11 of 14 Page 302 of 320
Employee Name Project / Deliverable Funding
Source Discipline Solution Area Solution Area Sub Category Dates of Payroll
Period
Total Salary &
Benefits charged
for this Reporting
Period
Total Project
Hours
REIMB
Request #
Total Cost Charged
to Grant
- - N/A -
CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES (Cal OES) Project
FMFW v1.15a - 2015
EXHIBIT G Page 12 of 14 Page 303 of 320
FMFW v1.15a - 2015
EXHIBIT G Page 13 of 14 Page 304 of 320
FMFW v1.15a - 2015
EXHIBIT G Page 14 of 14 Page 305 of 320
EXHIBIT H Page 1 of 11 Page 306 of 320
B. TRAINING
Objective
To determine that the Training expenditures were appropriately documented and that the activities aligned with the project’ s goals and objectives. If the Training activities involved employees, determine if the Subrecipient appropriately documented the Training expenditures using employee timecards, sign-in sheets, and certificates of training. If the Training activities involved using consultants or contractors, determine if the Subrecipient followed the appropriate procurement procedures to hire the consultants or contractors. Use Worksheets 1 and 3 (See Attachment E – Subrecipient Monitoring Worksheets).
Verification Yes No Comments
1. Did the Subrecipient receive funding for Training
expenditures? If yes, then continue. If no, continue
to next section.
2. Did the Subrecipient receive prior approval from
the State either via email or other documentation
and did it include the training course name and
number?
3. If the Training expenditures relate to the use of
employees, did the Subrecipient appropriately
document the Training expenditures using employee
timecards, sign-in sheets and certificates of training?
4. If Training expenditures relate to the use of
consultants/contractors, did the Subrecipient follow
proper procurement procedures to hire the consultants
or contractors?
5. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the Training
expenditures in their accounting records?
6. For Projects with overtime expenditures for Training:
a. Did the Subrecipient maintain employee timecards
to appropriately document the overtime expenditures?
b. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the overtime
expenditures in their accounting records?
EXHIBIT H Page 2 of 11 Page 307 of 320
B. TRAINING (Continued)
Verification Yes No Comments
7. For Projects with backfill expenditures for Training:
a. Does the Subrecipient have documentation that
the backfill expenditures were approved by the
State?
b. Did the Subrecipient appropriately document the
backfill expenditures using employee timecards and
sign-in sheets?
c. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the
expenditures in their accounting records?
8. Were employee timecards utilized in Training activities signed and dated by the employee and direct supervisor?
9. Were the Training expenditures consistent with the State approved grant award and/or post award modification(s)?
10. Ensure the Subrecipient corrected areas of noncompliance that remain outstanding and were reported as findings in prior Grant Year monitoring reports submitted by HSGA:
a. If the Project prior Grant Year monitoring report
finding was resolved, explain resolution, and indicate
such in the current report as resolved.
b. If the Project prior Grant Year report finding is not resolved, indicate why it has not been resolved and
what the Subrecipient is doing to resolve the prior
year finding and indicate such in the current report.
EXHIBIT H Page 3 of 11 Page 308 of 320
C. PLANNING
Objective
To determine that the Planning expenditures were appropriately documented and that the activities aligned with the project’s goals and objectives. If the Planning activities involved employees, determine if the Subrecipient appropriately documented the Planning expenditures using employee timecards and sign-in sheets. If the Planning activities involved using consultants or contractors, determine if the Subrecipient followed the appropriate procurement policies. Use Worksheets 1 and 3 (See Attachment E – Subrecipient Monitoring Worksheets).
Verification Yes No Comments
1. Did the Subrecipient receive funding for Planning
expenditures? If yes, continue. If no, continue to
next section.
2. Did the Subrecipient appropriately document the
Planning expenditures providing copies of the
support documentation that indicated the efforts
made to produce the final product and a copy of
the product produced?
3. If Planning expenditures relate to the use of employees, did the Subrecipient use employee timecards and
sign-in sheets?
4. If Planning expenditures relate to the use of
consultants/contractors, did the Subrecipient
follow proper procurement procedures to hire
the consultants or contractors?
5. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the
Planning expenditures in their accounting records?
6. For Projects with overtime expenditures for
Planning:
a. Did the Subrecipient maintain employee
timecards to appropriately document the
overtime expenditures?
EXHIBIT H Page 4 of 11 Page 309 of 320
C. PLANNING (Continued)
Verification Yes No Comments
b. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the
overtime expenditures in their accounting
records?
7. For Projects with backfill expenditures for Planning:
a. Does the Subrecipient have documentation
that the backfill expenditures were approved
by the State?
b. Did the Subrecipient appropriately document
the backfill expenditures using employee
timecards and sign-in sheets?
c. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the
backfill expenditures in their accounting
records?
8. Were the employee timecards utilized in Planning
activities signed and dated by the employee and
direct supervisor?
9. Were the Planning expenditures consistent with the
State approved grant award and/or post award
modification(s)?
10. Ensure the Subrecipient corrected area of
noncompliance that remain outstanding and were
reported as findings in prior Grant Year monitoring
reports submitted to HSGA:
a. If the project prior Grant Year monitoring report
finding was resolved, explain resolution, and
indicate such in the current report as resolved.
b. If the project prior Grant Year monitoring report
finding is not resolved, indicate why it has not been
resolved and what the Subrecipient is doing to
resolve the prior year finding and indicate such in
the current report.
EXHIBIT H Page 5 of 11 Page 310 of 320
D. EQUIPMENT
Objective
To determine that the project Equipment expenditures are supported by invoices and that a listing of the Equipment/property is maintained by the Subrecipient. To determine that the purchases are aligned with the project’s goals and objectives. Use Worksheets 2 and 3 (See Attachment E – Subrecipient Monitoring Worksheets).
Verification Yes No Comments
1. Did the Subrecipient receive funding for Equipment
expenditures? If yes, continue. If no, continue to
next section.
2. Did the Subrecipient maintain invoices to support
the Equipment expenditures?
3. Did the Subrecipient follow proper procurement
procedures to purchase the Equipment and were
the items listed in the federal “Authorized
Equipment List” and/or “Standardized Equipment List”?
4. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the
Equipment expenditures in their accounting records?
5. Did the Subrecipient maintain an Equipment
inventory that listed the following:
a) Description of Equipment,
b) Serial number or other identification number,
c) AEL number,
d) Fund/source/grant year,
e) Title holder,
f) 100 percent of federal participation. If no, then identify percentage, g) Acquisition date,
h) Acquisition cost,
i) Quantity,
j) Equipment location,
k) Use and condition of Equipment,
l) Disposal date and sale price of the Equipment
6. Did the Subrecipient conduct an inventory of
Equipment purchased with Cal/OES grant funds at
least once every two years?
EXHIBIT H Page 6 of 11 Page 311 of 320
D. EQUIPMENT (Continued)
Verification Yes No Comments
7. Was the Equipment physically inspected to ensure:
a. The Equipment existed and agreed to inventory
listing?
b. The Equipment worked and adequately trained
staff are available to operate the Equipment?
8. Did the Subrecipient maintain Equipment in a secure
location?
9. For property other than Equipment, i.e. supplies, did the Subrecipient have controls and accountability to
safeguard and ensure that the items are used and
solely for authorized purposes?
10. For Equipment disposal, if any:
a. Was the disposition consistent with federal
regulations?
b. What is the status of the proceeds received from the disposal?
11. Did the Subrecipient have a policy for damaged,
destroyed, lost or stolen Equipment including but
not limited to informing the Cal/OES, steps to replace the Equipment and an investigative process?
12. Were the Equipment expenditures consistent with
State approval grant award and/or post award
modification(s)?
13. Ensure the Subrecipient corrected areas of noncompliance that remain outstanding and were reported as findings in prior Grant Year monitoring reports maintained by HSGA:
a. If the project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding was resolved, explain resolution, and indicate such in
the current report as resolved.
b. If the project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding is not resolved, indicate why it has not been resolved
and what the Subrecipient is doing to resolve the prior year finding and indicate such in the current report.
EXHIBIT H Page 7 of 11 Page 312 of 320
E. EXERCISE
Objective
To determine that the Exercise expenditures were appropriately documented and the activities align with project’s goals and objectives. If the Exercise activities involved employees, determine if the Subrecipient appropriately documented the Exercise expenditures using timecards and sign-in sheets. If the Exercise activities involved using consultants or consultants, determine if the Subrecipient followed the appropriate procurement procedure. Use Worksheets 1 and 3 (See Attachment E – Subrecipient Monitoring Worksheets).
Verification Yes No Comments
1. Did the Subrecipient receive funding for Exercise
expenditures? If yes, continue. If no, continue to
next section.
2. Did the Subrecipient receive prior approval from the State either via email or other documentation and did it include the Exercise course name and number?
3. If the Exercise expenditures relate to the use of employees, did the Subrecipient appropriately document the Exercise expenditures using employee timecards, sign-in sheets, and certificates for Exercise?
4. If the Exercise expenditures relate to the use of consultants/ contractors, did the Subrecipient follow proper procurement procedures to hire the consultants or contractors?
5. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the Exercise
expenditures in their accounting records?
6. For Projects with overtime expenditures for Exercise:
a. Did the Subrecipient maintain employee timecards
to appropriately document the overtime expenditures?
b. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the overtime
expenditures in their accounting records?
c. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the backfill
expenditures in their accounting records?
7. For Projects with backfill expenditures for Exercise:
a. Does the Subrecipient have documentation that
the backfill expenditures were approved by the State?
b. Did the Subrecipient appropriately document the
backfill expenditures using employee timecards and
sign-in sheets?
EXHIBIT H Page 8 of 11 Page 313 of 320
E. EXERCISE (Continued)
Verification Yes No Comments
8. Were the employee timecards utilized in the Exercise activities signed and dated by the employee and direct supervisor?
9. Were the Exercise expenditures consistent with the State approved grant award and/or post award modifications?
10. Ensure the Subrecipient corrected areas of noncompliance that remain outstanding and were reported as findings in prior Grant Year monitoring reports:
a. If the Project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding was resolved, explain resolution and indicate such in
the current report as resolved.
b. If the Project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding is not resolved, indicate why it has not been resolved and what the Subrecipient is doing to resolve the prior year finding and indicate such in the current report.
EXHIBIT H Page 9 of 11 Page 314 of 320
F. ORGANIZATION
Objective
To determine that the Organization expenditures were appropriately documented and that the activities align with the project’s goals and objectives. If the Organization activities involved employees, determine if the Subrecipient appropriately documented the Organization expenditures using employee timecards and sign-in sheets. If the Organization activities involved using consultants or contractors, determine if the Subrecipient followed the appropriate procurement policies. Use Worksheets 1 and 3 (See Attachment E – Subrecipient Monitoring Worksheets).
Verification Yes No Comments
1. Did the Subrecipient receive funding for Organization expenditures? If so, continue. If no, continue to next section.
2. If the Organization expenditures relate to the use of employees, did the Subrecipient document the expenditures using employee timecards, sign-in sheets, or with other support documentation that substantiated the expense?
3. If the Organization expenditures relate to the use of consultants or contractors, did the Subrecipient follow proper procurement procedures to hire the consultants
or contractors?
4. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the Organization expenditures in their accounting records?
5. For Projects with overtime expenditures for Organization:
a. Did the Subrecipient maintain employee timecards to
appropriately document the overtime expenditures?
b. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the overtime
expenditures in their accounting records.?
EXHIBIT H Page 10 of 11 Page 315 of 320
F. ORGANIZATION (Continued)
Verification Yes No Comments
6. For Projects with backfill expenditures for Organization:
b. Does the Subrecipient have documentation that the
backfill expenditures were approved by the State?
c. Did the Subrecipient appropriately document the
backfill expenditures using employee timecards and
other payroll documentation?
7. Were employee timecards utilized in Organization activities signed and dated by the employee and direct supervisor?
8. Were the Organization expenditures consistent with the State approved grant award and/or post award modification(s)?
9. Ensure that the Subrecipient corrected areas of noncompliance that remain outstanding and were reported as findings in prior Grant Year monitoring reports maintained by HSGA:
a. If the Project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding was resolved, explain resolution and indicate such in the current report as resolved.
b. If the Project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding is not resolved, indicate why it has not been resolved and what the Subrecipient is doing to resolve the prior year finding and indicate such in the current report.
EXHIBIT H Page 11 of 11 Page 316 of 320
“Serving The People” "Sirviendo A La Comunidad"
Staff Report
04/19/2022 Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
Date: April 19, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor/Chair and City Council/Agency Members From: Alfonso Noyola, City Manager
By: City Clerk’s Office
Subject: Consideration to Approve an Augmentation to the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 City Budget in an Amount Not to Exceed $5,000 for Ellen Ochoa Learning Center Robotics Team
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council is requested to:
1. Augment the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 budget in an amount not to exceed $5,000 for Ellen Ochoa Learning Center Robotics Team; and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 22-16 to appropriate the funds not to exceed $5,000.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Ellen Ochoa Learning Center Robotics Team has announced they won the Excellence Aware and First Place in the Teamwork Challenge at Regional Championships. This led students and staff to get invited to the 2022 Vex IQ World Championships being hosted in Dallas, Texas.
Due to the Championships being hosted out of state, it is costing an approximately $20,000 for Cudahy students and staff to attend. In appropriating $5,000 for Ellen Ochoa Learning Center, it will give an opportunity to offset the cost for air, vehicle transportation, room, and board.
The Robotics Program has given Cudahy students the knowledge to build in the fields of science, math, and engineering; additionally leading the example for future Ellen Ochoa students.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Item Number
16D
“Serving The People” "Sirviendo A La Comunidad"
Staff Report
04/19/2022 Page 2 of 2
$5,000 from general funds
CONCLUSION
Upon Council’s approval, staff will proceed with recommended actions.
ATTACHMENT
A. Resolution No. 22-16
RESOLUTION NO. 22-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CUDAHY
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN APPROPRIATION FOR
ELLEN OCHOA LEARNING CENTER ROBOTICS TEAM
WHEREAS, Ellen Ochoa Learning Center is a school located within City of Cudahy’s jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the goal of the Robotics Program is for students to enhance their STEAM knowledge in the fields of science, math, and engineering; and WHEREAS, Ellen Ochoa Learning Center Robotics Team has won the Excellence Award and First Place in the Teamwork Challenge at Regional Championships and are now headed to the 2022 Vex World Champion; and WHEREAS, the appropriation will give City of Cudahy students an opportunity to offset the cost for air, vehicle transportation, room, and board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cudahy, California, as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves an appropriation in the amount Not to Exceed of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) for Ellen Ochoa Learning Center Robotics Team for Fiscal Year 2021-2022.
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Cudahy at its regular meeting on this 19th day of April, 2022.
Elizabeth Alcantar
Mayor
ATTEST:
Richard Iglesias
City Clerk
Attachment A Page 319 of 320
Resolution No. 22-16
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:
CITY OF CUDAHY )
I, Richard Iglesias, City Clerk of the City of Cudahy, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 22-16 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Cudahy at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of April, 2022 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Richard Iglesias
City Clerk