Cities Index.
Media Park Concept Design Report Final.pdf

City Council Meeting Agenda
February 28, 2022

Document
Media Park Concept Design Report Final.pdf
Meeting
February 28, 2022
Body
City Council Meeting Agenda
Original file
33.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on culver-city.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

FEB.28, 2022

CONCEPT DESIGN REPO

MEDIA PARK

++

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
(PRIME)
PUBLIC OUTREACH + FUNDING

GERDO AQUINO

CO-CEO SWA

JULISSA LOPEZ-HODOYAN

URBAN DESIGNER

ZHOUFEI ZHU

ASSOCIATE

JESSICA REYES-JUAREZ

URBAN PLANNER

COST ESTIMATING ARCHITECTURE CIVIL ENGINEERING MOBILITY/ TRAFFIC

CONSULTATION
THE
TEAM
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 2

110 PEOPLE RESPONDED!
MEETING #1: FEBRUARY 4, 2021
*5 people per car
277 PEOPLE RESPONDED!
MEETING #2: APRIL 22, 2021
TWO

PUBLIC MEETINGS

WHAT DO YOU

WANT IN THE
PARK?
WHICH

SCHEME DID
YOU PREFER?
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 3

WHAT DID WE HEAR?

MAINTENANCE
46%
89%

BELIEVE THE PARK IS NOT WELL-MAINTAINED

BELIEVE THE PARK NEEDS MORE/BETTER

LIGHTING
MAJORITY SUPPORT CONCERTS IN THE PARK!

PROGRAMMING
63%

HAVE ATTENDED AN EVENT AND ARE INTERESTED IN LOCAL
ART
67%
88%
38%

CONNECTED

ARE OK PARKING ACROSS THE STREET

OPEN TO CLOSING CANFIELD FOR TEMPORARY EVENTS

VALUE LOCAL BUSINESSES
93%
LAWN
70%

ECOLOGY & OPEN SPACE

SUPPORT NATIVE/ LOW-WATER PLANTING

FLEXIBLE SPACE AND OPEN LAWN WERE A
TOP PRIORITY.

MEDIA PARK IS PART OF A DOWNTOWN

CONNECTED NETWORK
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 4

EXISTING CONDITIONS

SITE AERIAL
NTS
TODAY
ACTORS’ GANG

EXISTING FOUNTAIN

LARGE TREES (TO BE

PRESERVED)

SMALL PAVILION

EXISTING PARKING LOT

DOWNTOWN

CULVER STEPS

CITY PARKING GARAGE
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
CULVER BLVD.

S CANFIELD AVE
VENICE BLVD.

PALMS
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 5

BIG MOVES
NTS
FUTURE
CULVER BLVD.

PALMS
ACTORS’ GANG

PARKING GARAGE

DOWNTOWN CC

MARKET SPACE

GATEWAYS/ ART AND HISTORY MARKERS
VENICE BLVD. EVENT SPACE

CAFES CANFIELD AVE
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 6

ACTORS’ GANG

EXISTING FOUNTAIN

RAISED TERRACE
STAGE

SLOPED GREAT LAWN

LARGE SWINGS

NEW PARKING
CAFE

EXISTING LARGE TREES
(PRESERVED)

BUFFER ALONG VENICE

STREET STEPS
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
VENICE BLVD.

S CANFIELD AVE.

CULVER BLVD.
10 10
10 11
11 THE ARC
OPTION 1

RELOCATE EXISTING PARKING
40’
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 7

1 23
4 56
7 8
9 NORTH
VENICE BLVD.

S CANFIELD AVE.

CULVER BLVD.

ACTORS’ GANG

EXISTING FOUNTAIN

RAISED TERRACE
STAGE

SLOPED GREAT LAWN

LARGE SWINGS

NEW PARKING
CAFE

EXISTING LARGE TREES
(PRESERVED)

BUFFER ALONG VENICE

STREET STEPS

PUBLIC ART
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
10 11 11
12 12
12 MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 8

MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 9

ACTORS’ GANG

EXISTING FOUNTAIN

OVERHEAD CANOPY
STAGE

GREAT LAWN

NATURE WALK

NEW ON STREET PARKING
CAFE

EXISTING LARGE TREES
(PRESERVED)

ENTRY FOCAL ART

PROMENADE

WELCOME COURT
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 10
11 12
12 11
10 9
VENICE BLVD.

S CANFIELD AVE.

CULVER BLVD.

THE INTERLINK
OPTION 2

RELOCATE EXISTING PARKING
40’
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 10

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 ACTORS’ GANG

EXISTING FOUNTAIN

OVERHEAD CANOPY
STAGE

GREAT LAWN

NATURE WALK

NEW ON STREET PARKING
CAFE

EXISTING LARGE TREES
(PRESERVED)

ENTRY FOCAL ART

PROMENADE
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 11
10 NORTH
VENICE BLVD.

S CANFIELD AVE.

CULVER BLVD.

MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 11

MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 12

THE ARC
OPTION 1

THE INTERLINK
OPTION 2

REDUCED PARKING
OPTION 2: THE INTERLINK
REDUCED PARKING Option 2: The INTERLINK

NO PREFERENCE

NO PREFERENCE

NO PREFERENCE

NO PREFERENCE
202 RESPONDENTS 122 RESPONDENTS
198 RESPONDENTS
131 RESPONDENTS
12 14
13 7
46 42
111
110

DO YOU PREFER A SCHEME WITH EXISTING

PARKING TO REMAIN, OR REDUCED
PARKING?

WHICH OPTION DO YOU THINK MOST
FULFILLS THE DESIRED PROGRAM (ie:

GREEN SPACE, ACTIVATION, CONNECTIVITY)
OF THE PARK?

WHICH PARKING SCHEME HARNESSES A

BETTER CONNECTION TO DOWNTOWN AND
THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS?

WHICH OPTION DO YOU PREFER IN TERMS
OF OPEN SPACE DISTRIBUTION?

EXISTING PARKING
OPTION 1:

THE ARC
OPTION 1:

THE ARC

EXISTING PARKING

TWO OPTIONS
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 13

THE ARC
OPTION 1

CONSTRUCTION COSTS
$5,067,162

COST WITHOUT PARKING ELIMINATION
-$448,068

CONSTRUCTION COSTS
$5,365,172

COST WITHOUT PARKING ELIMINATION
-$290,523

THE INTERLINK
OPTION 2

COST ESTIMATE
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 14

THE ARC
OPTION 1

THE INTERLINK
OPTION 2
ALTERNATE PROGRAM: PLAY AREA (NO STAGE)
CHILDREN’S PLAY

OUTDOOR TABLE TENNIS

COURT GAMES / BOCCE
BALL

ART / INSTALLATION
1 2
3 4
1 1
14 11
11 1
2 3
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 15

ACTORS’ GANG

EXISTING FOUNTAIN

OVERHEAD CANOPY
STAGE

GREAT LAWN

NATURE WALK

NEW ON STREET PARKING
CAFE

EXISTING LARGE TREES
(PRESERVED)

ENTRY FOCAL ART

PROMENADE

WELCOME COURT
1 1
2 2
33 4
4 5
5 6
6 7
7 8
8 9
10 11
12 12
11 10
9 VENICE BLVD.

S CANFIELD AVE.

CULVER BLVD.

IL1 : THE INTERLINK – AS IS

RELOCATE EXISTING PARKING
40’
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 16

IL2 : OPTIONAL PLAY AREA WITH MODIFIED PARKING
1 2
3 4
5 6
78 12
11 10
9 VENICE BLVD.

S CANFIELD AVE.

CULVER BLVD.

RELOCATE EXISTING PARKING
25’
25’
ACTORS’ GANG

EXISTING FOUNTAIN

OVERHEAD CANOPY

PLAY AREA

GREAT LAWN

NATURE WALK

NEW ON STREET PARKING
CAFE

EXISTING LARGE TREES
(PRESERVED)

ENTRY FOCAL ART

PROMENADE

WELCOME COURT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 17

CULVER BLVD.

PARKING
MEDIA
PARK
A
IL3 :OPTIONAL PLAY AREA WITH EXISTING PARKING
ACTORS’ GANG

EXISTING FOUNTAIN

OVERHEAD CANOPY

PLAY AREA

GREAT LAWN

ART WALK

NEW ON STREET PARKING
CAFE

EXISTING LARGE TREES
(PRESERVED)

ENTRY FOCAL ART

PROMENADE

WELCOME COURT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
1 2
3 4
5 6
78 12
11 10
9 VENICE BLVD.

S CANFIELD AVE.

CULVER BLVD.

KEEP EXISTING PARKING
A
25’25’
MEDIA PARK | CONCEPT DESIGN PRESENTATION | PAGE 18

THANK YOU!
QUESTIONS?

APPENDIX

EXISTING CONDITIONS

* Assume public restrooms will be
provided at shared site location.

CAFE

OPTION A - KIOSK
Catering kitchen and cafe counter.

STAGE
Outdoor performance space.

CANOPY
Shade structure.

Service Counter
Catering Kitchen
Food Storage
Trash/Recycling
Employee Restroom
Dining (Exterior)
Public Restrooms*
TOTAL
160 sf
250 sf
100 sf
50 sf
40 sf
N/A
N/A
600 sf
Stage
Mechanical
TOTAL
3,000 sf
100 sf
3,100 sf
TOTAL 4,000sf to
12,000 sf
A cafe kiosk would be designed to store and serve food; the preparation of food would occur off site. The cafe kiosk would require power for the kitchen and lighting, water for the kitchen and employee restroom, as well as trash and recycling collection services.

A catering kitchen would be supplied with all electric
appliances to include a refrigerator, freezer, microwaves, dishwasher, and hot pads. Professional sinks and dish
washing stations would be outfitted with disposals.

The cafe is a destination within the park and should be visible from the street. The architecture should create a dynamic and unique volume when secured, but be easily
converted into a counter-serve space when the cafe is
active. Resilient materials like metal and concrete should be used on the exterior, while the interior should be fitted in a stainless steel commercial grade kitchen.

The cafe design should encourage the community to use
the park as a dining destination for both on and off site food purchases. Dining seating should be programmed into the park as a permanent fixture to seamlessly integrate the cafe into the park context.

The kitchen should be compact and secure. Set up,
operation, and closing should be feasibly performed by a single staff member.

An outdoor stage would be designed for lighting and
sound. Stage lights would be fixed to the overhead
structure and would be provided with accessible, secured controls below. Power supply at the stage platform
would be provided for professional performance sound
equipment. The sound equipment would likely be provided by third parties.

Electric supply to the stage could potentially be
supplemented with solar energy collection on site.

The stage should encourage performances to activate the park in unique ways, both as a traditional outdoor theater and in new, experimental modes. Not only home to theater troops and impromptu performers, the stage should
double as an event space and pavilion when not hosting a performance.

The design should be complimentary but distinct from
the Ivy Substation. Though the structure of the outdoor stage should respect the historic value of the Substation, proximity between the two elements is essential to provide shared backstage programs.

The stage should have a concrete base and metal frame
canopy to support lighting and sound equipment.

Additional materials can be added to orient and shade the stage.

A shade canopy would require integrated lighting. Electric supply could potentially be tied to solar energy collection on site.

A canopy on site will provide shade to the exposed areas of the park, and can be used as an element to tie together the cafe, outdoor dining, stage, restrooms, and Ivy
Substation access. The canopy should include integrated lighting to support evening events and to provide
increased security to the park at night. The lightweight metal canopy frame should be grounded in concrete
footings.

DESIGN, PERFORMANCE, & MATERIALS DESIGN, PERFORMANCE, & MATERIALS DESIGN, PERFORMANCE, & MATERIALS

UTILITIES & OPERATION UTILITIES & OPERATION UTILITIES & OPERATION

ARCHITECTURE

ANALYSIS

THE ARC
OPTION 1
* Assume public restrooms will be
provided at shared site location.

STAGE
Outdoor performance space.

CAFE

OPTION B - KITCHEN
On site food prep and cafe counter.

CANOPY
Shade structure.

Service Counter
Food Prep
Food Storage
Trash/Recycling
Food Waste Collection
Employee Restroom
Dining (Exterior)
Public Restrooms*
TOTAL
160 sf
550 sf
200 sf
50 sf
50 sf
40 sf
N/A
N/A
1,000 sf
Stage
Mechanical
TOTAL
3,000 sf
100 sf
3,100 sf
TOTAL 4,000sf to
12,000 sf
A cafe kitchen would be designed to prepare, store, and serve food on site. The cafe kitchen would require a gas line, power for the kitchen and lighting, water for the kitchen and employee restroom, and trash, recycling,
and food waste collection services. In addition, food
preparation on site would require an underground grease interceptor.

A professional kitchen would be supplied with electric
microwave and dishwashers, walk in cold storage, and
gas oven and range. Professional sinks and dish washing stations would be outfitted with disposals.

The cafe is a destination within the park and should be visible from the street. The architecture should create a dynamic and unique volume when secured, but be easily
converted into a counter-serve space when the cafe is
active. Resilient materials like metal and concrete should be used on the exterior, while the interior should be fitted in a stainless steel commercial grade kitchen.

The cafe design should encourage the community to use
the park as a dining destination for both on and off site food purchases. Dining seating should be programmed into the park as a permanent fixture to seamlessly integrate the cafe into the park context.

The kitchen should be compact and secure. Set up,
operation, and closing should be feasibly performed by a single staff member.

An outdoor stage would be designed for lighting and
sound. Stage lights would be fixed to the overhead
structure and would be provided with accessible, secured controls below. Power supply at the stage platform
would be provided for professional performance sound
equipment. The sound equipment would likely be provided by third parties.

Electric supply to the stage could potentially be
supplemented with solar energy collection on site.

The stage should encourage performances to activate the park in unique ways, both as a traditional outdoor theater and in new, experimental modes. Not only home to theater troops and impromptu performers, the stage should
double as an event space and pavilion when not hosting a performance.

The design should be complimentary but distinct from
the Ivy Substation. Though the structure of the outdoor stage should respect the historic value of the Substation, proximity between the two elements is essential to provide shared backstage programs.

The stage should have a concrete base and metal frame
canopy to support lighting and sound equipment.

Additional materials can be added to orient and shade the stage.

A shade canopy would require integrated lighting. Electric supply could potentially be tied to solar energy collection on site.

A canopy on site will provide shade to the exposed areas of the park, and can be used as an element to tie together the cafe, outdoor dining, stage, restrooms, and Ivy
Substation access. The canopy should include integrated lighting to support evening events and to provide
increased security to the park at night. The lightweight metal canopy frame should be grounded in concrete
footings.

DESIGN, PERFORMANCE, & MATERIALS DESIGN, PERFORMANCE, & MATERIALS DESIGN, PERFORMANCE, & MATERIALS

UTILITIES & OPERATION UTILITIES & OPERATION UTILITIES & OPERATION

THE INTERLINK
OPTION 2

ARCHITECTURE

ANALYSIS

CONCEPTUAL COST

ANALYSIS
*REFERENCE THE APPENDIX FOR

COMPREHENSIVE COST ANALYSIS BREAKDOWN
DOCUMENTATION.

CIVIL

ANALYSIS

STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)

STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)
A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be filed with the State Water Resources Control Board prior to the start of construction will be needed if the project area is confirmed to be greater than one acre. During construction, storm water runoff will be managed using sandbags, rumble plates, and other appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) in compliance with the state of California Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ.

In October 2011, the City of Los Angeles passed an ordinance (Ordinance No. 181,899) imposing rainwater Low Impact Development (LID) strategies on projects that require building permits. The LID ordinance became effec- tive on May 12, 2012.

LID is a stormwater management strategy with goals to mitigate the impacts of increased runoff and stormwa- ter pollution as close to its source as possible. LID promotes the use of natural infiltration systems, evapotrans- piration, and the reuse of stormwater. LID aim at removing nutrients, bacteria, and metals from stormwater while also reducing the quantity and intensity of stormwater flows. The LID guidelines specify that the project storm water mitigation strategies be selected according to the following tiers:

Tier 1 - Infiltration
Infiltration requires the captured storm water to be minimally treated and sent below grade to recharge the groundwater aquifer.

Tier 2 - Capture and Reuse
The capture and reuse strategy typically involves treating captured storm water and utilizing the resulting water for irrigation or reuse in the building. This strategy requires more infrastructure, including a tank, pumps, treatment systems, and pumps.

Tier 3 - Biofiltration
Biofiltration is a strategy that requires planters and swales with engineered soil media and planting material to treat storm water using natural processes. This treatment system requires site area to use as biofiltra- tion planters.

Site specific geotechnical engineering recommendations will be required to understand the site soils characteristics and whether infiltration will be possible. Infiltration could be achieved through shallow infiltration trenches and/or deep infiltration drywell systems (such as the MaxWell systems by Torrent) depending on the depths of the existing soils conducive to infiltration.

In the event infiltration is deemed infeasible on site, the project will be required to implement Tier 2 - Capture- and-Reuse strategies. To verify the feasibility of storm water Capture-and-Reuse, the LID Ordinance requires the project demonstrates that during the 7 months of the wet season (October 1 to April 30) the estimated total irrigation water use for the project landscape areas is greater or equal to the storm water runoff volume of the 85th percentile annual 24-hour rainfall. Based on the nature of the project, we anticipate that this criterion will be met, and Tier 2 would need to be implemented. A conventional Capture-and-Reuse system consists of directing all surface sheet flow and roof drains to an underground pre-treatment unit and storm water storage cistern system (CDS and DuroMaxx system by Contech for example). Irrigation water is then pumped from the cistern to the project landscaped planters.

An alternative Capture-and-Reuse system consists of providing the irrigation storage volume integrated within the landscape planters. Proprietary products such as “EPIC” planters (see detail below) are pre-engineered and meet the City of Los Angeles LID Tier 2 requirements.

A Capture-and-Reuse design for LID would require coordination early in the design phase with many disciplines. In addition to approval with the Department of Public Works Bureau of Sanitation that has jurisdiction over LID and the Department of Building and Safety, the plans will also need to be reviewed by the Los Angeles County Health Department.

While Tier 3 – Biofiltration might not be retained as the main LID strategy for the project based on the City of Los Angeles priority order, it could be used as pre-treatment to supplement a Tier 1 or Tier 2 system.

Biofiltration swales typically receive runoff from site areas. Within the biofiltration swales, draught-tolerant planting material, mulch, and sandy loam planting material work in tandem to filter contaminants and allow for clean runoff to be infiltrated. Biofiltration swales for the project could be engineered as integrated within the park organic landscaped areas or integrated as part of improved walkways around the park perimeter.

CIVIL

ANALYSIS

The Interlink

← All documents from this meeting