City Council Meeting Agenda
January 9, 2023

These drawings are property of RRM Design Group not to be used or reproduced without written permission of RRM Design Group. july 11, 2011
tracts 2342 & 2353 - site plan
prado road
Mar Garita
aV enue
a FFordaB le
HousinG site
Basin
tract 2342
tract 2353
calle
M
al
Va

SERRA MEADOWS
These drawings are property of RRM Design Group not to be used or reproduced without written permission of RRM Design Group. july 11, 2011
tracts 2342 & 2353 - site plan
prado road
Mar Garita
a Venue
a FFordaB le
HousinG site
Basin
tract 2342
tract 2353
calle
M
al
Va
Site Plan

CREATING

ENVIRONMENTS
PEOPLE
ENJOY®

SITE PHOTO
Serra Meadows, San Luis Obispo

CREATING

ENVIRONMENTS
PEOPLE
ENJOY®

SITE PHOTOSITE PHOTO
Myrtle Street ResidenceMyrtle Street Residence
December 8, 2022 | Qualifications for the

CITY OF CULVER CITY

ADU PROTOTYPES

GRAPHICS & PHOTOGRAPHS:

This document features images of RRM Design Group’s projects, the graphics and photos of which are owned and copyrighted by our firm.

ABOUT RRM DESIGN GROUP:
32332 Camino Capistrano, Ste. 205 • San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 p: (949) 361-7950 • f: (949) 361-7955 • w: rrmdesign.com California corporation • Leonard Grant, Architect C26973 • Robert Camacho, PE 76597 • Steven Webster, LS 7561 • Jeff Ferber, PLA 2844 The written and graphic materials contained in this proposal are the exclusive property of RRM Design Group.

The unauthorized use of any portion of these text or graphic materials without RRM’s prior written consent is expressly prohibited. © 2022 RRM Design Group

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Name
1 Scope and Fee
2 Qualifications
Page
1 10

PROPOSAL FOR CITY OF CITY OF CULVER CITY

ADU PROTOTYPES

1 SECTION 1 | Scope and Fee | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES a California corporation ● Lenny Grant, Architect C26973 ● Jerry Michael, PE 36895, LS 6276 ● Jeff Ferber , LA 2844
N:\2000\2159-01-RS20-1138-Madonna-Rd-ADU\Architectu re\Model\2159-01-1138 Madonna-ADU-Building.rvt 2/17/2021 8:34:59 PM
A-12159-01-RS21 - 1138 Madonna Rd
RENDER
2/17/2021

CLIENT REVIEW

Section
1Sc OPE aN d F EE
Proposal for ADU Prototypes

RRM PROJECT
Madonna Road ADU
San Luis Obispo, California
UP
01 - F.F.

T.O.P. 1
LEVEL 2
T.O.P. 2
PL
12' - 0"
15' - 0"
11' - 0"
6' - 0"
5' - 0"
25' - 0"
9' - 0"1' - 1"9' - 1"
19' - 2"
4 A-2
4 A-2
5 A-2
5 A-2
1 A - 3
1 A - 2
GARAGE
12'-0"x23'-0"
COV. ENTRY
5' - 0"

EXISTING HOUSE
10' - 1 1/2"
(E) DOOR
GATE
5' - 0"
-
-
25' - 6"
19' - 6" 6' - 0"
26' - 2 7/8"
1' - 8 7/8" 24' - 6"
4' - 6" 20' - 0"
24' - 6"
4 A-2
4 A-2
5 A-2
5 A-2
1 A - 2
STUDIO
BATH
CL
21' - 0"
9' - 0" 12' - 0"
24' - 6"
10' - 0"14' - 6"
24' - 6"
1' - 2" 23' - 4"
20' - 0" 1' - 0"
01 - F.F.

T.O.P. 1
LEVEL 2
T.O.P. 2
GARAGE
STUDIO
9' - 0"1' - 1"9' - 1"
19' - 2"
01 - F.F.

T.O.P. 1
LEVEL 2
T.O.P. 2
GARAGE
STUDIO
9' - 0"1' - 1"9' - 1"
19' - 2"
a California corporation ● Lenny Grant, Architect C26973 ● Jerry Michael, PE 36895, LS 6276 ● Jeff Ferber , LA 2844
N:\2000\2159-01-RS20-1138-Madonna-Rd-ADU\Architectu re\Model\2159-01-1138 Madonna-ADU-Building.rvt 2/17/2021 8:35:01 PM
A-22159-01-RS21 - 1138 Madonna Rd

PLANS - ELEVATIONS & SECTIONS
2/17/2021
1/4" = 1'-0"
FRONT ELEVATION -SCHEMATIC OPT 3
1/4" = 1'-0"
GROUND FLOOR PLAN - SCHEMATIC OPT 3
1/4" = 1'-0"
SECOND FLOOR PLAN - SCHEMATIC OPT 3
1/4" = 1'-0"
SECTION 1 SCHEMATIC OPT 3
1/4" = 1'-0"
SECTION 2 SCHEMATIC OPT 3
N
3D View 2
2 SECTION 1 | Scope and Fee | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

SCOPE OF SERVICES
RRM understands you are looking to develop a series of pre-approved housing units and provide for homeowners to be able to streamline the processing of utilizing those plans for their unique and individual needs. RRM will work with the City staff and building officials to generate three complete permit-ready plan prototypes to support this new program. These plans will vary in size from 400 sf to 800 sf. RRM’s community-based design will help assure that these plans have elevation options that allow personal taste and are appropriate to the community’s architectural vernacular. Designs are also to be consistent with Culver City Design Guidelines and be customizable to match the finishes of the primary residence.

RRM achieves an elevated project efficiency and coordination level due to the multidisciplinary service structure. We can provide implementable solutions due to a single-line in-house responsibility that allows the project manager to directly coordinate most of the project’s components. While most of the primary scope will be provided in-house by RRM Architecture, Planning, and Structural Engineering, there will be times when outside consultants and City coordination will be required. RRM will need to coordinate and meet with City staff, various departments, and interest groups in addition to those specifically outlined in this scope.

TASK 1: KICKOFF –

ESTABLISH A STRONG

FOUNDATION
RRM embraces a collaborative approach to the
design process. Starting with the kickoff meeting,
the City will be a partner in formulating the best
solution to address the goals unique to Culver City.

In this project’s initial phase, the team will engage
in a due diligence process designed to inform the
team and key City staff on the primary issues to be
addressed and gather and review relevant data and
background information.

SUBTASK 1.A: PROJECT INITIATION
Following the review of existing data, the project
team will meet with City staff to establish a mutual
understanding of the key issues and further define
the scope of work, project schedule, expectations,
layout of significant project milestones, meeting
times, deliverable targets, and review of pertinent
data. This meeting would comprise key RRM design
staff, City stakeholders, and staff to help thoroughly
vet the project’s goals. The meeting is anticipated to
be virtual through Teams or another City-designated
method.

Deliverables:
• One (1) meeting with City staff; project initiation
meeting
• One (1) meeting minute in PDF format
Schedule:
• Within one (1) week of contract initiation
City Staff Requirements:
• Attend kickoff meeting and support RRM
background data gathering
SUBTASK 1.B: DATA GATHERING AND

DOCUMENT RESEARCH
As a first step in the process, the consultant team
will collect and review all data relevant from design
guidelines, the general plan, the development code,
specific plans, local jurisdiction’s unique requirements, jurisdiction’s individual ADU ordinances, and other
planning efforts that have a bearing on the community.

Next, RRM, in coordination with City staff, will
review identified opportunities for implementation
to further inform the final design solutions. RRM will
conduct a virtual windshield survey of the different
types of single-family architectural styles in Culver
City. Information collected will be used by RRM and
the staff project team to decide how many and what
3 SECTION 1 | Scope and Fee | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES architectural styles of ADU building types (exteriors)
to include in the Permit-Ready ADU Program. Finally,
RRM will prepare a program document to establish
the project goals and alternatives the City wishes to
achieve with the final designs.

Deliverables:
• PDF format memo review of materials and
recommendations
• PDF format memo of project program
Schedule:
• Three (3) weeks
City Staff Requirements:
• Respond to inquiries to support RRM background
data gathering
• Review and evaluate programmatic constraints and
opportunities as identified in research
TASK 2: PRELIMINARY ADU

PLAN DEVELOPMENT
RRM will compile the relevant data and goals from
the research and City meetings to establish a
straightforward program with identified constraints
and opportunities to be used as the basis for the
preliminary design. Based on the initial description,
RRM will provide design for a series of ADU projects
to be reviewed by City staff and regional partners
based upon the initial description. These designs will
include three generic prototype ADU units designed
to fit on generic flat lots and include the following:
• One (1) approximately 400-500 sf: studio
configuration ADU in compliance with California
Residential Code, California Code of Regulations,
Title 24, Part 2.5, not exceeding 16’ in height and
designed to conform to a typical flat lot
• One (1) approximately 500-650 sf: One
bedroom, one bath configuration ADU in
compliance with California Residential Code,
California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part

2.5, not exceeding 16’ in height and designed to
conform to a typical flat lot
• One (1) approximately 800 sf: Two bedroom,
two bath configuration ADU in compliance with
California Residential Code, California Code of
Regulations, Title 24, Part 2.5, not exceeding 16’ in
height and designed to conform to a typical flat lot
Each of the three plan types will be designed to adapt
to and include three alternate elevation styles. In
addition, at least one elevation from each prototype
design will accommodate an optional covered porch
as a design option. Designs will be developed for a
variety of lot configurations which will be presented
as both square and narrow configurations to allow for
the widest implementation opportunities. The final
unit configuration and mix will be developed with
staff through the initial tasks and may vary from the
list above.

SUBTASK 2.A: PRELIMINARY DESIGN
RRM recognizes that residential design can be one of
the purest manifestations of community character,
and many people are passionate about homes.

Therefore, RRM encourages a collaborative approach
to working with staff to deliver designs that respond
to the community’s unique character. Following the
initial staff meeting in Task 1 above, RRM will design
a series of preliminary site plans/floor plans, sections, and elevations for the unit prototypes. We will review
the designs with staff for comment and approval at
approximately the 30% completion stage. Designs
will include typical front elevation style options. Plans will be based on generic sites as directed by staff. It is assumed that City staff will coordinate all submittals, applications, and notices associated with any public
hearings if later desired.

Deliverables:
• PDF format submittal
• One (1) meeting with the City staff; to review
preliminary floor plans (currently expected to be
conducted remotely on platform of City’s choice)
• One (1) meeting with the City staff; a preliminary
plan, massing and elevation review meeting
(currently expected to be conducted remotely on
platform of City’s choice)
4 SECTION 1 | Scope and Fee | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES • Preliminary site/floor plans for three (3) unit prototypes • Preliminary sections for three (3) unit prototypes –
as needed
• Preliminary style options for front elevation of three (3) options per plan for a total of nine (9) front elevations Schedule:
• Six (6) weeks included staff review meetings
Meeting:
• One (1) concept design review meeting
• One (1) schematic design (30% set) review meeting
Schedule:
• Attend review meetings and respond to design
presentations
SUBTASK 2.B: SCHEMATIC DESIGN
RRM recognizes that residential design can be one of
the purest manifestations of community character, and
many people are passionate about homes. Therefore,
RRM encourages a collaborative approach to working
with staff to deliver designs that respond to the
community’s unique character. Following the initial
staff collaboration in Task A.3 above, RRM will design
a series of preliminary site plans/floor plans, sections, and elevations for the unit prototypes. We will review
the designs with staff for comment and approval at
approximately the 30% completion stage. The designs
will include typical front elevation style options. Plans will be based on generic sites as directed by staff.

Deliverables:
• PDF format 60% plan set
• Floor plans for three (3) ADU prototypes with design
options
• Sections for three (3) ADU prototypes
• Elevations for three (3) ADU prototypes – four sides
of each unit
• Three (3) style options of the front elevation of each of the nine (9) ADU base unit prototypes
• Color and material boards – one (1) for each
elevation style as printed images
• Nine (9) color-rendered perspectives for publication
Schedule:
• Six (6) weeks included staff review meetings
Meeting:
• One (1) staff review meeting
TASK 3: ADU

CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS
SUBTASK 3.A: DOCUMENT PREPARATION

AND PLAN REVIEW
Once the designs are reviewed and approved by
staff, RRM will develop the design into construction
documents and coordinate the documents with
consultants as needed. RRM typically develops the
structural design in-house to achieve the highest
efficiency level through coordinated collaboration.

Our goal would be to express the design intent with
a structural system that considers the most material
and cost-efficient approach to provide a more
implementable affordable housing solution. This type
of detailed review is typically only achievable with
an in-house structural design where all parties share
a mutual goal. Title 24, mechanical, and electrical
engineering consultants will typically be contracted
through RRM. RRM has long working relationships
will all its subconsultants who understand our work
approach and value our collaboration. Again, design
efficiency will be a key parameter for mechanical
and electrical design. RRM is a leader in efficient,
sustainable design. We anticipate only one round
of plan check revisions and resubmittal. RRM
anticipates a single coordinated review for regional
partners’ jurisdiction for building and fire. The City
will be responsible for the coordination of plan
reviews and comments from additionally noted
jurisdictions.
5 SECTION 1 | Scope and Fee | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES Plans to be produced to the following criteria:

1. All designs shall fully comply with the 2022
California Residential Code, California Code of
Regulations, Title 24, and Part 2.5.

2. All designs shall comply with the 2022 California
Building Code (CBC), California Code of
Regulations, Title 24, and Part 2 for structure(s)
or elements(s) exceeding the design limitations
in the CRC or specifically directed by the CRC
to use the CBC.

3. Minimum structural design criteria:
a. Conventional Framing per 2022 CRC with
wood-braced panel lateral resistance per
CRC conventional construction
b. Roof framing is assumed to be truss framed
for cost and usability
c. Risk Category: II
d. Seismic Design Category (SDC): D
e. Soil Site Class: D
f. Design Spectral Response Acceleration:

SDS = 2.0 Max
g. Ultimate Design wind Speed: 95 mph per
CBC Fig 1609.3 (1)
h. Wind Exposure Category: C
i. Assume no Topographic Effects: Kzt =1.0
j. SF (Reducible based on Tributary Area)
k. 40 PSF
l. Roof Dead Load: 16 PSF (Includes PV
System of 1 PSF & Tile roof material)
m. Exterior Dead Load: 19 PSF (Assume 3-coat
stucco)
n. Exterior Wall Deflection Limitation: H/360

4. Minimum Energy Compliance Design Criteria:

State Title 24 Energy Compliance
documentation in all four primary orientations
(north, south, east and west-facing)
a. Climate Zones 8
b. Exterior Wall Insulation: R-15
c. Attic Insulation: R-38
d. Designed for both heating and cooling: 92
AFUE (Heating); 15 SEER (Cooling)

5. Foundation Design Criteria:

The foundation design for building sites that
do not exceed a slope of one (1) vertical to
three (3) horizontal units and a deep foundation
design. The design does not assume unstable
soil or expansive clay soil.
a. Soil Bearing Pressure: 1500 PSF (w/out
Geotechnical Report)
b. II. Lateral Bearing Pressure: 100 PCF
(shallow foundation), 200 PCF (deep
foundation)
c. III. Foundation Depth based upon soils
report or City soils policy
d. IV. Grading and Drainage Plans under
separate permits. And not a part of this
scope

6. Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone:
a. All buildings in the City of Agoura Hills are
to comply with the construction standards
for structures located in VHFHSZ in
accordance with CBC Chapter 7A / CRC
R337.

7. Fire Resistive Construction Details:

The proposed detached units should be
anticipated to be located within four feet of a
real or assumed property line on the rear or
side elevation. Therefore, for each proposed
plan elevation, the rear and side elevation will
be designed to comply with CRC Table R332.1
(1) Fire Resistance Protection/Rating of Exterior
Wall elements.

The following minimum fire protection details
shall be included within the plans:
a. One-hour fire-rated wall construction
detail for each architectural style that would
comply with ASTM E1 19 or UL 263 testing
b. One-hour fire-rated projection details on
the underside of the projection for each
architectural plan style. Assume a two-foot
minimum fire separation distance
c. Design elevation where the opening on the
exterior firewalls shall not exceed 25% of
the wall area
d. Specifications and details of roofing material
and roof sheathing that would comply with a
two-foot minimum fire separation distance
6 SECTION 1 | Scope and Fee | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

8. Fire Sprinkler Design Criteria:
a. Accessory dwelling units with Automatic
Fire Sprinkler Protection;
b. The minimum fire separation distances in
exterior wall openings are:
▪ < 3 feet not allowed
▪ ≥ 3 feet unlimited openings
c. Accessory dwelling units without Fire
Sprinkler Protection;
Design elevation where the opening on the
exterior firewalls shall not exceed 25% of
the wall area where separation distance ≥ 3
feet to < 5 feet
▪ < 3 feet not allowed
▪ ≥ 5 feet unlimited openings
d. Note to be provided on the plans indicating
that when fire sprinklers are required, the
fire sprinkler systems shall comply with
the requirements for an NFPA 13D Fire
Sprinkler system.

Deliverables:
• PDF format plan set
• Jurisdictional-specific cover sheet
• Generic site plan with fillable information – no
grading, stormwater or utilities information five (5)
feet beyond unit
• Floor plan
• Foundation plans (both slab on grade and raised
foundation options based upon CBC soil minimums
of 1500 PSF)
• Floor Framing plans
• Roof plan
• Roof Framing Plan / Truss plan
• Sections; as necessary, maximum of two (2) per unit
• External elevations; one front, two sides and rear as plan typical elevations
• Front exterior elevation options; two (2) optional
front elevations per plan, for a total of three (3) per plan, with associated details
• Renderings of exterior: one (1) exterior elevation
rendering per style for marketing publication
provided as individual graphic files
• Recommended external and internal materials
• Architectural and structural details
• Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing plans; limited
to line diagram electrical and mechanical, gas
isometric only
• T24 Energy calculations (compliant for all building
orientations)
• No Fire sprinklers plans to be provided other than
designating the requirement for fire sprinklers as
applicable
• High fire zone detail sheet and fire department
compliance information
• CalGreen (Title 24 / Part 11) requirements sheet
• One (1) plan review cycle is anticipated
Final Delivery Documents:
• 24 x 36 PDF file
• 11 x 17 PDF file (non-scalable)
• Color exterior renderings suitable for marketing and
publication
• Illustrative floor plan for marketing and publication Schedule:
• Twelve (12) weeks of production time
Meetings:
• One (1) pre-submittal 90% set review meeting
– prior to submittal for jurisdictional process
coordination
• One (1) staff meeting after approvals in preparation
for City Council presentation
• One (1) City Council informational presentation
Schedule:
• Building official coordination meeting to establish
consistent review procedures
• Plan review as required to make permit ready
7 SECTION 1 | Scope and Fee | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES TASK 4: FORMS AND

MANUALS
TASK 4.A: ADU DESIGN MANUAL
Once the designs are established and approved by
staff, RRM will develop the ADU Design Manual
to inform the public about the process and
options for their implementation. The manual will
show how “typical lots” could add an ADU and
which prototypes may work best for certain site
conditions. This +/-10-page, visually attractive, easy- to-read user guide will include text and graphics
illustrating the different ADUs. The guide will
consist of a checklist of the various requirements
applicable to the corresponding ADU type.

Deliverables:
• One (1) PDF of the ADU Design Manual. We ask that
staff consolidate all comments into one redlined version of the draft, and RRM will make one round of revisions
TASK 5: MANAGE THE

PROJECT
TASK 5.A: PROJECT MANAGEMENT/

COORDINATION
The foundation of RRM’s practice relies on expert
and proactive project management. Accomplishing
each unique assignment within the needed timeframe
and allocated budget is essential. RRM focuses on
capturing a clear direction on final deliverables and end products at the beginning of a project, establishing a
shared understanding of the project with the City and
all team members. This provides an essential project
“road map,” RRM develops a critical path schedule,
monitoring and updating it regularly throughout the
process. We make it a practice to provide regular
status reports of project progress and closely
coordinate with the City’s project manager and key
consultant team members. RRM views close project
team collaboration as a key mechanism to ensure issues
are well-vetted and fully addressed because better
projects result from multiple perspectives. In addition, all product deliverables are reviewed internally for
quality control purposes before the City submittal.

We have found it helpful to establish mutually
agreeable, timely turnaround review times in
managing a schedule. One helpful approach can
be for the City to provide one redlined, marked-
up version of comments from its staff so that all
comments are reconciled and expedite the revision
process. Early consultation with affected agencies
and stakeholders is vital for a smooth and efficient
process. These approaches reduce potential
surprises that can add costs, cause delays, and dilute
consensus. In addition, the performance of project
managers is evaluated in several ways:
• Monthly review of compliance with project
budgets by Task by RRM management
and principals. Our Deltek Vision project
management and accounting software also allow
project managers and principals to track daily
time entries and task budgets
• Ongoing oversight by the principal-in-charge
regarding contract and schedule adherence as
well as overall project progress
• Periodically, report cards are provided to clients
to solicit feedback on the project manager and
overall project performance
• Annually, project managers are evaluated on the
quality of their performance
• Throughout the project process, client feedback
is sought by both RRM project managers and
contract personnel to ensure satisfaction and
provide the opportunity for adjustment if needed
We take project management seriously and are
committed to delivering on time and on budget!
RRM may need to coordinate and meet with City
staff, various departments, and interest groups in
addition to those specifically outlined in this scope.

This will include information teleconferences,
meetings, research correspondence, status reports,
record keeping, project coordination, electronic file
management, preparation for meetings, and all other
coordination during the project.

Deliverables:
• PDFs, project administration, and coordination as
needed
• Conference calls and emails as needed
• Print sets for plan check submittal and resubmittal
8 SECTION 1 | Scope and Fee | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

WORK PROGRAM ASSUMPTIONS
• Meeting Attendance. The project budget includes attendance at public meetings identified in the work program. The costs of additional meeting attendance would be on a time and materials basis if requested. In addition, meetings are assumed to be conducted using a virtual format. • Draft Documents. A draft of each document will be provided to staff and revised based on a single set of consolidated comments providing clear direction.
• Printing. This budget assumes the City will be responsible for printing and distributing documents. • Environmental Review. The scope of work requested does not include environmental documentation or clearance pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Environmental documentation and technical studies are not included in this work program. However, such documentation would be provided on a time and materials basis if requested.
• All permit-ready ADU designs will be developed to use 2022 CRC conventional construction code.

Therefore, any design revisions that exceed this assumption’s constraints may require additional engineering and fee.
• This proposal assumes the City will maintain the approved architect or engineer stamped originals, issue users unstamped copies, and require a hold harmless agreement signed by the end user. The wording suggested similar to ”By using these Permit Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit construction documents, the user agrees to release, hold harmless, and indemnify the City, its elected officials and employees, and the Architect or Engineer who prepared these construction documents from any and all claims, liabilities, suits and demands on account of any injury, damage or loss to persons or property, including injury or death, or economic losses, arising out of the use of these construction documents.”

9 9SECTION 1 | Scope and Fee | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES RRM
SCOTT
MARTIN
RRM
RANDY
RUSSOM
RRM
CONNER
CHURCH

RRMSTAFF
RRM

ELIZABETH
OCAMPO
VIVERO

RRMSTAFF
RRM

JESSICA

MEADOWS

RRMSTAFF
220 $ per hour 220 $ per hour 125 $ per hour 120 $ per hour 180 $ per hour 138 $ per hour 175 $ per hour 120 $ per hour TASK 1: ESTABLISH A STRONG FOUNDATION FEE
TYPE

ESTIMATED
FEE

1.A Project Initiation T&M 1,840$ 2 $440 2 $440 2 $250 0 $0 2 $360 0 $0 2 $350 0 $0

1.B Data Gathering and Document Reasearch T&M 4,956$ 2 $440 2 $440 4 $500 10 $1,200 4 $720 12 $1,656 0 $0 0 $0 Task 1 Value: 6,796$
TASK 2: PRELIMINARY ADU PLAN DEVELOPMEN FEE
TYPE

ESTIMATED
FEE

2.A Preliminary Design T&M 7,460$ 6 $1,320 8 $1,760 12 $1,500 24 $2,880 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0

2.B Schematic Design T&M 15,125$ 6 $1,320 12 $2,640 16 $2,000 72 $8,640 0 $0 0 $0 3 $525 0 $0 Task 2 Value: 22,585$
TASK 3: ADU CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FEE
TYPE

ESTIMATED
FEE

3.A Document Preparation and Plan Review (Three [3] plans) T&M 39,640$ 6 $1,320 16 $3,520 28 $3,500 110 $13,200 0 $0 0 $0 28 $4,900 110 $13,200 Task C Value: 39,640$
TASK 4:FORMS AND MANUALS FEE
TYPE

ESTIMATED
FEE

4.A ADU Design Manual T&M 25,200$ 2 $440 16 $3,520 24 $3,000 0 $0 40 $7,200 80 $11,040 0 $0 0 $0 Task D Value: 25,200$
TASK 5: MANAGE THE PROJECT FEE
TYPE

ESTIMATED
FEE

4.A Project Management/Coordination T&M 7,000$ 4 $880 20 $4,400 8 $1,000 0 $0 4 $720 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Task D Value: 7,000$
101,221$
1,479$
102,700$
Subtotal
Estimated Project Total
Reimbursable Expenses

FEE SCHEDULE
Culver City ADU Pre-Approved Plans
November 3, 2022
Senior Project Manager Project Architect Principal PlannerPrincipal/Design Director
Engineering Production
StaffStructural Engineer
Fee Footnote
Estimated fees for tasks shown as “Time and Materials” (T&M) are provided for informational purposes. Amounts billed for these tasks, which will reflect actual hours worked, may be more or less than the estimate given.

Reimbursable Expenses
Incidental expenses incurred by RRM Design Group or any subconsultant it may hire to perform services for this project are reimbursed by the client at actual cost plus 10% to cover its overhead and administrative expenses.

Adjustment to Hourly Billing Rates
RRM reserves the right to adjust hourly rates on an annual basis.

Planning StaffArchitecture Production
Staff

COST PROPOSAL
10 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

Section
SectionRRM PROJECT
Dublin Objective Design Standards
Dublin, California
2QUALIFICATIONS
Proposal for ADU Prototypes
11 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

CREATING

ENVIRONMENTS
PEOPLE
ENJOY®

SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
32332 Camino Capistrano,
Ste. 205
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
p: (949) 361-7950

SAN LUIS OBISPO (HQ)
3765 South Higuera St., Ste. 102
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
p: (805) 543-1794

SAN DIEGO
310 3rd Avenue
Unit C-26 A
Chula Vista, CA 91910

SAN LEANDRO
325 Davis St.

San Leandro, CA 94577
p: (510) 751-4910

SANTA BARBARA
10 East Figueroa St., Ste. 200
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
p: (805) 963-8283

VENTURA
422 East Main St.

Ventura, CA 93001
p: (805) 652-2115

WEBSITE
www.rrmdesign.com
RRM Design Group is a California
corporation and an employee-
owned company, incorporated
November 26, 1974.

FIRM PROFILE | RRM Design Group
RRM exists because we love creating environments people enjoy. That is what got us into the business over 47 years ago, and it is why we continue to thrive today. Our architects and landscape architects, engineers, surveyors, and planners work with our clients and their communities to create the parks our c h i l d re n p l ay i n , t h e ro ad s we d r i ve d ow n o n o u r w ay t o wo r k , t h e n e i g h b o r h o o d s we come home to, and the fire stations that keep our communities safe.

Our work culture emphasizes collaboration, frequent communication, and accessibility. We're a close partner with our clients, helping them understand and navigate through the project lifecycle. Whether your project is public or private, commercial or residential, we listen, we design, and we deliver. On time. On budget. Since 1974.

PERSONNEL BY DISCIPLINE
183 professionals on staff at RRM Design Group in 6 core disciplines:
33 California Licensed Architects
35 Architecture Designers
14 California Licensed Civil Engineers
3 California Licensed Structural Engineers
20 Engineering Designers
18 California Licensed Landscape Architects
12 Landscape Designers
16 Community & Urban Planners
1 Licensed Surveyor
3 Surveying Technicians
31 Administrative Support Staff
20 LEED® Accredited Professionals
3 Certified Planners (AICP)
4 Congress for New Urbanism Accredited Professionals
1 Bay-Friendly Qualified Professional
1 Envision Sustainable Professional
1 Certified Arborist
Randy Russom with serve as project manager for the project.

Contact information:
p: (805) 903-1227 | e: [email protected]

12 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

TEAM ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
As project manager, Randy's primary responsibility is delivering the project to you on time and on budget.

Working in cooperative partnership with City staff, RRM's project manager will serve as an extension of staff to successfully coordinate the design and create plans for the ADU process. He is responsible for coordinating with all technical design team members to harness the team's horsepower to successfully develop the full potential of the project work products. Randy's responsibilities include the following:
• Project Point of Contact
• client c oordination and Reporting
• Contract Administration
• Schedule Development and Management
• Budget Supervision
• Quality Control and Assurance
• Resource Allocation
• Staff Forecasting
Randy has selected the following team of RRMers to join him in supporting City of Culver City’s needs:

SCOTT MARTIN AIA, LEED AP, CNU-A
Principal-in-Charge

RANDY RUSSOM AIA
Project Manager + Director of Architecture

CITY OF C ULVER CITY

RRM DESIGN GROUP

SUPPORT STAFF
Primary Point of Contact

ARCHITECTS

PLANNERS

URBAN DESIGNERS

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

ENGINEERS
RRM Design Group has a
variety of in-house resources
who assist with special
projects when needed. A
selection of those professionals
we tap into most often for
design review assignments are
featured here.

CONNOR CHURCH
Connor is a residential architect who has 5 years under his belt and brings his passion for the built environment into creating spaces, small and large, that meet the needs of all stakeholders.

JESSICA MEADOWS SE, PE
Jessica has dedicated 11 years to sharing her passion for structural engineering, stressing what an important role structural engineers can provide on the project team.

ELIZABETH OCAMPO VIVERO
Elizabeth is a principal planner with 14 years of experience. She brings her knowledge of ADUs to the team and will coordinate and conduct usability testing for the Permit Ready Program.

JAMI WILLIAMS, CNU-A
Consulting Planning Principal + Design Standards Specialist

TIM CARSTAIRS CEA, HERS, GPR
Tim started Carstairs Energy in 2005 and was one of the first Title 24 companies to offer services online.

Subconsultant
13 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES SCOTT MARTIN | AIA, LEED AP , CNU-A
Principal + Residential Architect
Scott is a talented architect with a keen ability to be innovative and sensitive to clients’ needs. His project focus and experience are wide-ranging, from illustration, master planning, urban design, needs assessments, and design review to the production and construction of facilities. Scott is a LEED Accredited Professional with a high level of expertise in designing and implementing sustainable solutions. Scott’s unique relationship with both public and private clients gives him an understanding of the realities of development and community priorities.

He excels in working directly with owner and user groups to set project goals and priorities. With his strong technical skills, Scott blends cohesive design solutions to bring a project’s vision to reality.

CITY OF ARCADIA
MULTIFAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES 13 Draft
April 2019

DESIGN GUIDELINES

9. Windows and Doors
a. Window and door types, materials, shapes,
proportions, and detailing should be
compatible with the architectural style of the
building and should have quality molding and
framing.
b. Floor plans should be designed to allow
proper placement and sizing of windows to
complement the chosen architectural style.

Windows should be placed with adequate
spacing between window/door trim and wall
edges/top plates.
c. Garage doors facing the street are highly
discouraged.
d. Where appropriate to the architectural style,
window detailing, such as sills, trim, shutter
and/or awnings, should be utilized.
e. Shutters should be proportionate in size to
the windows to create the appearance of
functionality.
f. Awnings or prominent architectural features
over building entrances should be utilized to
provide a defined building entry that provides
a sheltered area and orients residents and
visitors.
g. Where appropriate to the architectural style,
windows and doors should be inset from the
walls a minimum of two (2) inches to create
shadow detailing and visual appeal.
h. Replacement windows should be compatible
to the overall building in style and material.
i. Preferred window materials include:
• Wood
• Composite clad
• Colored vinyl
• Coated metal
j. Discouraged window materials include:
• Anodized aluminum

Window trims and sills improve overall building
design

Window articulation and detailing is achieved
through integrated sill, trim, and awning

Shutters should be proportionate in size
to windows and create the appearance of
functionality

Fremont Design Guidelines
Arcadia Design Guidelines Update
Relevant Projects
• Agoura Hills ADU Plans
• Arcadia Design Guidelines Update
• Brentwood Zoning Ordinance
Update
• Buellton Community Design
Guidelines
• Calabasas General Plan Update
• Carlsbad Village and Barrio
Master Plan
• Capitola Mall Design Peer Review
Services
• Cerritos Residential Design Manual
• Cupertino Residential/Mixed-Use
Design Standards
• Dublin Citywide Multifamily
Design Standards
• Mission Street Studios ADU
• Mono County ADU Design
• Murrieta Affordable Housing
Design Development
• Newport Beach Permit Ready
ADU Plan and Public Outreach
Improvement Services
• Porterville Accessory Dwelling Unit
and Multifamily Dwelling Unit Plans
• San Luis Obispo County
Pre-Approved ADU Plans
• San Ramon Pre-Approved ADU
Program
• Walnut Creek ADU Acceleration
• West Creek Residential
Subdivision (Noveno)

CREATING

ENVIRONMENTS
PEOPLE
ENJOY
21 Years of Experience
Education
• Bachelor of Architecture, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA
Licenses, Accreditations,
and Affiliations
• Architect, CA, C32348
• Architect, CO, 00405508
• Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design Accredited
Professional (LEED AP)
• Congress for the New Urbanism
Accredited (CNU-A)
• American Institute of Architects
(AIA), San Luis Obispo Chapter,
Member
• San Luis Obispo Chamber of
Commerce Economic Development
Committee
14 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES JAMI WILLIAMS | CNU-A
Consulting Planning Principal + Design Standards Specialist Jami possesses the qualities necessary to produce creative, realistic and business-conscious design solutions that will guide future improvements of the City of Culver City. With over 25 years of experience as an urban designer and project manager, Jami’s unique perspective enables her to advance projects from the early community outreach and visioning stages to the development of urban design plans and policy documents that are creative yet realistic and implementation-focused. She is well-versed in smart growth, mixed-use and transit-oriented planning principles that maximize quality design, minimize costs, and build on community consensus. She excels in public outreach, identifying public concerns and preferences and translating them into cutting-edge workable designs and policy documents that can be easily understood by community members and implemented by her public agency clients. Further, her strong communication and organization skills consistently ensure she delivers projects on time and on budget, always focusing on client satisfaction.

Most Relevant Projects
• Agoura Hills Pre-Approved
Building Plans for ADUs
• Alhambra New Comprehensive
Zoning Code
• Brentwood Zoning Ordinance
Update
• Buena Park Housing Element
Update
• Carpinteria Downtown Design
Overlay Program
• Cerritos Housing Element Update
• Cupertino Residential/Mixed-Use
Design Standards
• Dublin Citywide Multifamily
Design Standards
• El Cajon Civic Center Pre-
Development Planning and Design
• El Corazon Specific Plan
• El Monte Housing Element Update
• Encinitas SB 2 Planning Grant
(Objective Design Standards)
• La Puente Housing Element
Update
• Merced County Community Plans
(Franklin-Beachwood)
• Mission Avenue Housing
Strategic Plan
• Rosemead Housing
Element Update
• Santa Cruz County ADU Pre-
Approved Building Plan Options
• Torrance Housing Corridor
Districts Analysis
• Walnut Creek ADU Acceleration

CREATING

ENVIRONMENTS
PEOPLE
ENJOY
26 Years of Experience
Education
• Master of Business
Administration, Architecture
Management Track, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA
• Bachelor of Architecture,
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo, CA
• Semester Design Program,
Ecole Des Beaux Art
Americaines De Fontainebleau,
France
• Associate of Science, Cuyamaca
College, San Diego, CA
Licenses, Accreditations,
and Affiliations
• Congress for the New
Urbanism Accredited (CNU-A)
• American Planning Association
(APA), Member
• Urban Land Institute (ULI),
Associate Member
2-5
Last Modifi ed: October 7, 2013
North 40 Specific Plan
Land Use and Development Standards 22
85 17
C2 ST

NODDIN AVESOUTH A ST
R2 ST

NORTH A STSOUTH A STNEIGHBORHOOD ST

LLLALALALLALLLLALALALALALALALLALALALALALALLALLALALALALALLLLALLLALLALALLLALLALALLLALLALLALALLALALALALALALALALALLLALALLALLLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRKRKRKRKRKRRRRRKRKRRRRRRKRKRRKRRKRRRRRRRRRRKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVVEVEVEVEVEVEVVEVVVVVVEVVEVVVEVVEVVEVVVVEVVEVVVVEVEVVVVEVEVVEVVEVEVEEEEEE LARK AVE

LOLOOLOLOLOLOOOLLOLOLOOOOLOLOLOLOOOLOLOLLOOOOOOOOOLOLLOLOOOLOLOLOLOLOOLOOLLLL SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS GAGAGAAAAAAAAAGAAGAGAGAGAAAAAAGAAGAAGGAAGGGAAGAGAAGAGGAGAGAAGAGAAGGGAGGGAGAAGAAGAAAAAGAAAGGAGGAGGGGAAAGAGAAATOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTTOTOTTTTOTTTTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTTTTOTTTOTOOOTOOTTOTTOTOTOOOTTOTOOOOTOOO SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS BLBLBLBLBLLBBLBLLBLLBLBLBLBBLBLBLBLBLBBLBLBLBLLBLBLBLBLBLBBLBBLBLBBLBLBBBLBLBLBBLVDVDVDVDVDVDVDDVDVVDVVDDVDVDVDVDVDVDVDDDVDVVDVVDVDVDDDVVDDVDVDDDDDDDDDDDDVDDVVVVDDDDDVDDDVDDVDDVDDVVDDDVLOS GATOS BLVD

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

EEEEEEE

CACACACAAAAAAACACAAACACACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMIMMIMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

CACCACACACACACACACCACCACCACACCACACACACACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

MMMMMMMIMMMMMIMIMMMIMMIMIMIMIIMMIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

CACACACACCCCCCACCCACACCCCACACCCACAACAACACCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMIMIMIMMMMMMMMIMMIMIMIMMIMIMIMIMIMMIMMMMMMMIMIMMMMMIMMIMIMIMMMMMIMM NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

CACCCCACACACCCAAAACACACACAAAAMIMIMIMMIMIMIMMIMIMIMMM NNNNNNNNN

BURTON RD

DISTRICT LEGEND
LARK

DISTRICT

TRANSITION

DISTRICT

NORTHERN

DISTRICT

DISTRICT
EDGE

OVERLA Y
ZONE

PERIMETER

OVERLA Y
ZONE
Figure 2-1 District Plan
N
North 40 Specific Plan

CITY OF DUBLIN ADU PROGRAM
STAND-ALONE TWO BEDROOM - 973 S.F.
%('5220

[

/,9,1*

[

5()
',1,1*

[

.,7&+(1

[

(175<
%$7+

[

&/2
&/2
3266,%/(,6/$1'
)25025(
6725$*(
(1685(:,1'2:,1
%('5220)25(*5(66
&2817(5'(37+
5()
67$1'$5'*$6
25(/(&75&5$1*(
67$1'$5'6,1.
237,21$/
',6+:$6+(5





%('5220

[

&/2

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
1/4” = 1’-0” (8.5X11 SHEET)
024 8
Dublin Objective Design Standards
15 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES As an engineering major with an early love of creation and a family of artists, a career in architecture was inevitable for Randy. Now, with over three decades of experience as an architect, Randy is an expert in construction management, hospitality projects, and custom residential work. As the former planning commissioner for the City of Arroyo Grande and a current member of the Board of Directors for the San Luis Obispo Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, Randy brings a collaborative approach to his work, aiming to utilize all the creative intellect his team encompasses.

His work with RRM yields award-winning results that satisfy the needs of his clients, his team, and the community.

Relevant Projects
• Agoura Hills Pre-Approved
Building Plans for ADUs
• Concord Accessory Dwelling Units
Standard Drawings Development
• Dublin Citywide Multifamily
Design Standards
• Dublin Objective Design
Standards and ADU Prototypes
• Fixlini Street ADU,
San Luis Obispo
• Los Gatos Architectural
Consultant Services
• Madonna Road ADU,
San Luis Obispo
• Mission Cove Mixed-Use
Development with Affordable
Housing, Oceanside
• Mono County ADU Design
• Newport Beach Permit Ready
ADU Plan and Public Outreach
Improvement Services
• Porterville Accessory and
Multifamily Dwelling Unit Plans
• San Luis Obispo County
Pre-Approved ADU Plans
• San Ramon Pre-Approved
ADU Program
• Santa Cruz County ADU Pre
Approved Building Plan Options
• Serra Meadows Housing
Development with ADUs,
San Luis Obispo
• Tyler Street Mixed-Use
Development, Monterey
• Walnut Creek ADU Acceleration
• West Creek Residential
Subdivision (Multifamily & ADUs)

CREATING

ENVIRONMENTS
PEOPLE
ENJOY
33 Years of Experience
Education
• Bachelor of Architecture, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA
Licenses, Accreditations,
and Affiliations
• Architect , CA, C24410
• American Institute of Architects
(AIA)
• American Institue of Architects
Central Coast Chapter (AIACCC),
San Luis Obispo, President
• City of Arroyo Grande, Planning
Commissioner
• City of Arroyo Grande, Bridge
Street Replacement Committee
RANDALL RUSSOM | AIA, ASID
Project Manager + Director of Architecture
West Creek Residential
Subdivision
Mission Cove Mixed -Use
Development
16 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

ELIZABETH OCAMPO VIVERO
Principal Planner + ADU Specialist
Elizabeth is a passionate urban planner with experience in community planning, land use planning, project management, and urban design. Prior to joining RRM, Elizabeth worked as Director of Planning and Urban Design at MW Steele Group, a planning and architecture firm in San Diego, where she led the planning practice of the firm and managed a series of projects, including multi-family re-development projects, streetscape improvement projects, and specific plan amendments. Elizabeth’s experience includes seven years at the City of San Diego Planning Department, where she participated in multiple phases of the community plan update process for Old Town San Diego, Midway - Pacific Highway, and North Park. While at the City of San Diego, she also managed grant-funded planning efforts.

Her experience also includes supporting retail, educational, and healthcare projects and preparing subdivision plans for residential development while working for a structural engineering firm and a land development engineering firm in Mexico.

Relevant Projects
• Agoura Village Specific Plan
Implementation Analysis,
Agoura Hills
• Carlsbad Objective
Design Standards
• Carpinteria Downtown
Design Overlay Program
• Dana Point General Plan
Outreach
• Dixon Comprehensive Zoning
Update
• El Segundo Downtown
Specific Plan Update
• Escondido Public Art Master Plan
• Euclid Village Senior Housing -
WPH, Upland
• Goleta Objective Design
Standards for Multiple Dwelling
and Mixed-Use Developments
• Magnolia Villas Affordable
Housing - WPH, Upland
• Merced County Community Plans
(Franklin-Beachwood)
• San Carlos Downtown
Specific Plan
• San Diego Clairemont
Community Plan
• Walnut Creek ADU Acceleration

CREATING

ENVIRONMENTS
PEOPLE
ENJOY
14 Years of Experience
Education
• Master of City Planning, Master
of City Planning, San Diego State
University
• Bachelor of Science, Architecture,
Universidad Autónoma de Baja
California
 of 6. draft march 20 2007
Planting Palette
Design Templates

STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS

GUIDELINES
Agoura Road West of Kanan Road
Scale: 1”=20’-0”
0 20’10’20’
N
Key Map
* Notes:

1. All streetscape improvements have been provided as detailed concepts only. Actual streetscape design is pending final design of road geometry and building architecture plans.

2. See board 1 of this series for material and furnishings examples for items 1-12 above. 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12Flagstone pavers. Set stones on 4” thick concrete slab and mor- tar in place.

Cut flagstone paver banding at tree grates & pedestrian lighting.

Exposed aggregate concrete. Color concrete integrally with Da- vis ’Sandstone‘ color #527. Select pea gravel material in warm, earthy tones, as shown.

Scored-colored concrete. Color concrete integrally with Davis ’Sandstone‘ color #527. Provide a 4’x4’ score pattern.

Natural sandstone boulders. Stones should reflect material na- tive to the Santa Monica Mountains. Set boulders on 6” minimum gravel bed allowing 1/ of boulder height to remain below finish grade.

Planter pot. Wausau Tile - ‘Site lines’ planter pot. Model #SL400 with ‘Black Coffee’ patina finish #F1.

Tree grate. Neenah Foundry Company - ‘Boulevard’, 5’ Cast-iron round tree grate with removeable light cover & frame, Model #888-A. Natural Patina Finish.
18”x18“x6” cut sandstone bollard with natural, rough hewn finish. Stone should reflect material native to the Santa Monica Mountains. Core drill & secure Bollard to ground with 2” galva- nized steel pipe and sleeve. Epoxy in place.

Pedestrian lighting. Sternberg Vintage Lighting - ‘Prarie’, Model #120 with square pole. Locate lights @ ~65’ O.C.

Bike rack. Du Mor Site Furnishings - ‘Loop Bike Rack’, Model #8- 00 with Bronze powder coat finish
Refuse receptacle. Du Mor Site Furnishings - ‘Redwood Recep- tacle’, Model #152-1R with natural finish on redwood slats and bronze powder coat finish on cast-iron rosettes.

Wood benches. Smith & Hawkin - 6’ ‘Giverny Bench’, Model #786442 with natural finish.

Poured-in-place or concrete masonry unit retaining wall with natural field stone veneer. All walls should include a concrete cap at least 15” wide and colored integrally with Davis ‘Sandstone’ color #527.

Natural wood trellis. Construct of certifiably sustainably harvested Redwood, Cedar, or Ipe wood.

Accent feature at center of traffic circle, see sheet 5 of this series for more information.

Construction of new streetscapes and adjacent developments should strive to protect-in-place ex- isting Oak trees. All Oaks on site shall be considered but the specific trees represented above are of primary concern.
13 15
16 17
Agoura Road
Highway 101
Kanan Road
Plan Area
Agoura Road
Kanan Road
42 circula tion
Chapter Five

COMMUNITY PLAN
PP

BOUNDARY

COMMUNITY PLANMCOMM

BOUNDARY

COMMUNITY PLANC
BOUN
DARY
B

COMMUNITY PL
AN
UN
IT
Y
BOUN
DARY
Y
Ro
Road
FresnoRo FFresRd
Jefferson Str
ee
et
Jackson S
treetStreet
Jack
kson
ham Road h Rd
PolkStreet PoolkkSStrre
t ett
Truman AveTA
Kennedy StKKennnnedydyyyS
Ada
dams Stre
et
McKeeStreet McKee Street
MKSt MMMKKStr
et
McDowell StreettStreell SweM DoM teetStreowell SDoMcDM
Washington StreettttStSttihinshWasWWW eteegg
Ford StreetF Std t
Cook StreetCook Street
CCC k St t
Santa Fe Avenue
e
Le GrandLGL
Brice StreettttSB iBBrice Streeet
Murdock StreetMu
MarshahhMM
l Streetttl St
Woodrow StreetttStSd tWWW etteetreStw SwrowodrWoo
Ogle AvenueuenuenveAve AgleOgOgle Avenue
StreetSt Strt eet
WilsonWilWilsson
allll
Madison Stre
et
Mon
roe
Street
Fillmore CtllFilF reoremollmFilF
TaftTaft
TaylorTy
Chapman
RoadddRR
GrandGG d
Hainline Avenue
Hainline Avenue
Hainline Avenue
Hainline AvenueHainlinee AvenueHainlinee Avenue
Sa
Santa
Fe
Ave
n
Sa
nta
Fe
Ave
Santa Fe Ave
Jefferson Street
Savana Road
Savana Road
Sav
Savana Roadvana Road
Railroad AvenueRailroad AvenueRailroad
d Avenue
Jefferson
fersoeJe
on Str
ee
etet
Str
e
S
NTS
Jefferson Street
Cunningham Road
Jackson Street
Railroad Avenue
Polk Street
Wilson Street
Truman Ave
Kennedy St
Adams Street
McKee Street
McDowell Street
Ford Street
Santa Fe Avenue
Le Grand Road
Santa Fe Avenue
Murdock Street
Marshall Street
Woodrow Street
Madison Street
Monroe Street
Fillmore Ct
Chapman
Washington Street
Brice Street
Ogle Avenue
Cook Street
Fresno Road
FIGURE 5.1 CIRCULATION PLAN
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Urban Local Road
Potential Urban Local Road
Potential Truck By-Pass Route
Potential Pedestrian Connection
Agoura Village Specific Plan
Merced County Community Plans
17 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES As a young architect, Connor brings enthusiasm and creativity to the project team. With a passion for efficient and sensible design solutions, Connor enjoys working with his team to develop goals in order to realize your comprehensive project. At RRM, Connor has utilized his strengths on public and private projects ranging from one-off ADUs to large K-12 campus projects. Connor has significant experience working on ADU prototypes and other similar projects. With a strong team at his side, Connor has developed prototype plans of various styles and scales for community-focused subdivisions and city pre-approved ADU projects.

Relevant Projects
• 1138 Madonna Road ADU,
San Luis Obispo
• 13th Street Grover Beach Single-
Family Residential Subdivision
• 16 Prairie Grass (Chen Residence
& ADU), Irvine
• 1728 Lima Drive Residential ADU,
San Luis Obispo
• 712 Anapamu Street Accessory
Dwelling Units, Santa Barbara
• 770 Buchon Street ADU,
San Luis Obispo
• Concord Accessory Dwelling Units
Standard Drawings Development
• Grand Oaks Micro Community,
Atascadero
• Mono County ADU Design
• Orcutt Key Site 30 Bradley
Village Single-Family Residential
Development
• Porterville Accessory Dwelling Unit
and Multifamily Dwelling Unit
Plans
• Rice Ranch Meadows North,
Grove West, and Grove East,
Orcutt
• San Luis Ranch Single-Family
Residential Subdivision,
San Luis Obispo
• San Ramon Pre-Approved ADU
Program
• Santa Cruz County ADU Pre-
Approved Building Plan Options
• Vintage Ranch SFR Subdivision
Schematic Design, Orcutt

CREATING

ENVIRONMENTS
PEOPLE
ENJOY
5 Years of Experience
Education
• Bachelor of Architecture, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA
Licenses, Accreditations,
and Affiliations
• Architect, CA, 39684
A-1

MIRAVALE PARCEL D

SOLEDAD, CA
DATE: 02/10/17
0047-05-RS15
APN: 022-441-011-000

TITLE SHEET

MIRAVALE PARCEL D

SOLEDAD, CA
A-1 Title Sheet
A-2 Site Context Photos
A-3 Architectural Site Plan/ Section
L-1 Landscape Plan
C-1 Existing Conditions
C-2 Proposed Subdivision
C-3 Utilities
C-4 Grading and Drainage
C-5 Storm Water Management
A-4 Duplex Floor Plans
A-5 Duplex Elevations Style 1
A-6 Duplex Elevations Style 2
A-7 4-plex Ground Floor Plan
A-8 4-plex Second Floor Plan
A-9 4-plex Elevations Style 1
A-10 4-plex Elevations Style 2
A-11 Street Perspective

PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT STATISTICS

SHEET INDEX
Property Owner:

Nader Agha
449 Alvarado
Monterey, California
93940
Architect / Engineer:

RRM Design Group
3765 S. Higuera
Suite 102
San Luis Obispo, Ca 93402
(808) 543-1794
Architect: Randall Russom
Civil: Tim Walters
Landscape Architect: Chris Dufour
Project Description:

The project is a multi-family residential project consisting of 92 units in 29 buildings, (17) 4-plex and (12) duplex. Each 4-plex building is two stories with (1) three bedroom unit, (2) two bedroom units, and (1) one bedroom unit for a total of 4 units per building.

Each Duplex building is two stories with (1) three bedroom unit and (1) one bedroom unit for a total of 2 units per building.
(12) total – 1,996 SF, duplex units
(17) total – 3,518 SF, 4-plex units
Site amenities include a child play area/ park and walking paths. The project is requesting a density bonus and other concessions and incentives as defined in the in the City Of Soledad municipal code, Chapter 17.39 and State of California Government Code Section 65915.

Site Information:

APN: 022-441-011-000
Gross Site Area: 4.96 Acres / 216,058 SF
Zoning: R-3 High Density Residential
Density:

Allowed: 16/acre (22/acre with CUP) = 79 (110 units)
Proposed: 19 units/acre = 92 units
t
Parking:

Required (per Municipal Code 17.36.20)
2 spaces per unit

0.25 guests spaces per unit
= 2.25 x 92 units = 207 spaces
Parking provided
5 garage spaces per 4-plex 17 buildings x 5 = 85
3 garage spaces per duplex 12 buildings x 3 = 36
Driveway spaces 29 buildings x 3 = 87
Street parking spaces =2
Total = 210 spaces
The applicant is requesting application of the parking
Standards per the California Density Bonus law
per California State Government Code Section 65915-65918, Lot Coverage (structures):

Allowed: 60% = (216,058 x 60%) = 129,635 SF
Proposed = 58,254 SF (26.9%)
Setbacks: Allowed/Proposed
Front 15’ 15’
Side 5’ 5’
Rear 15’ 10’
Maximum Height: Allowed = 2 stories / 30’
Maximum Height Proposed = 26’ (2 stories)
Gross Floor Area:

Building: 85,280 SF
Roads: 39,900 SF
Driveways: 31,700 SF
Each Building: Duplex 1,996 SF
4-plex 3,518 SF
Total: Duplex 12 x 1,996 SF =23,952 SF
4-plex 17 x 3,518 SF =59,806 SF
83,758 SF
Affordable Housing Density Bonus
The applicant is proposing the project to be
in conformance with California Density Bonus
Law per California State Government Code
Section 65915-65918, by providing 10% Low
income units. The project is proposing to provide
(8) one bedroom units to be restricted as low
income affordable rentals. While no density
bonus will be needed with the proposed density
being approved through the CUP process, the
applicant is applying the maximum parking
requirements as outlined by the law of 1 space
per one bedroom unit and 2 spaces per two
bedroom units. While other incentives may
be available and the applicant may choose
to request these at a future date, no other
incentives are currently requested.

Building Square Footage Breakdown:

Duplex:
3 bed 1,370 SF
(2 car garage 404 SF)
1 bed 626 SF
(1 car garage 189 SF)
Total: 1,996 SF
4-plex:
3 bed 1,370 SF
(2 car garage 404 SF)
1 bed 620 SF
(1 car garage 189 SF)
2 bed 795 SF
(1 car garage 213 SF)
2 bed 733 SF
(1 car garage 213 SF)
Total: 3,518 SF

VICINITY MAP

SANTA YNEZ
LAS FLORES ST.

ORCHARD LN
GABILAN DR.

SAN ANTONIO
GABILAN DR.

JACK FRANSCIOLI

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

BRYANT CANYON RD

PROJECT
SITE

CONNOR CHURCH
Residential Architect
Soledad Miravale II Parcel D & E
Emerald Ridge Apartments
18 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES Jessica has spent the last decade dedicated to sharing her passion for structural engineering. Whether it be working with the design team on a residential project, mentoring young professionals, or teaching students at San Luis Obispo’s California Polytechnic State University, she is always sure to stress what an important role structural engineers can provide on the project team. Her experience has a wide variety: single-family, multifamily, mixed-used, new education campuses and buildings, modernizations, pre-check documents, seismic rehabilitation, and accessory structures.

Jessica has acted as a project manager to oversee the design process and construction of many successful projects.

Relevant Projects
• 1011 Joseph Court ADU, Nipomo
• 102 South Voluntario ADU,
Santa Barbara
• 1138 Madonna Road ADU,
San Luis Obispo
• 1728 Lima Drive Residential ADU,
San Luis Obispo
• 21712 Lane Street ADU, Perris
• 2418 Calle Real ADU
Construction Documents,
Santa Barbara
• 2995 Beachcomber Drive
Remodel and ADU, Morro Bay
• 5700 Portola Road ADU,
Atescadero
• 712 Anapamu Street ADU,
Santa Barbara
• Agoura Hills Pre-Approved
Building Plans for ADUs
• Centennial Square Affordable
Housing, Santa Maria
• Concord Accessory Dwelling Units
Standard Drawings Development
• Dublin Citywide Multifamily
Design Standards
• Mission Street Studios ADU,
Santa Barbara
• Mono County ADU Design
• Newport Beach Permit Ready
ADU Plan and Public Outreach
Improvement Services
• Porterville Accessory Dwelling Unit
and Multifamily Dwelling Unit
Plans
• San Luis Obispo County
Pre-Approved ADU Plans
• San Ramon Pre-Approved ADU
Program
• Santa Cruz County ADU Pre-
Approved Building Plan Options
• Walnut Creek ADU Acceleration

CREATING

ENVIRONMENTS
PEOPLE
ENJOY
11 Years of Experience
Education
• Bachelor of Science,
Architectural Engineering,
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo, CA
Licenses, Accreditations,
and Affiliations
• Structural Engineer, CA, S6488
• Professional Engineer, CA,
C81987
JESSICA MEADOWS | SE, PE
Structural Engineer
DW
6 A-2
6 A-2
5 A-2
5 A-2

EXISTING HOUSE
28' - 0" 3' - 6"
11' - 0 1/2" 19' - 0"
11' - 0" 17' - 0"
28' - 0"
16' - 0" 3' - 0"
9' - 0" 7' - 0"
19' - 0"
31' - 6"

BEDROOM
CL
BATH
LIVING
01- F.F.

T.O.P. 1

BATHCLBEDROOM
9' - 1"
01- F.F.

T.O.P. 1
9' - 1"LIVINGCL PNTRY
PLASTER SIDING.COLOR TO
MATCH EXISTING APARTMENT.

TYP.

ASPHALT SHINGLE

ROOF TO MATCH
EXISTING HOUSE.

TYP.

WROUGHT IRON TRELLIS
FEATURE.COLOR AND STYLE TO
MATCH EXISTING APARTMENT.

DARK WOOD ACCENT.

COLOR TO MATCH

EXISTING APARTMENT
TRIM
6 A-2
6 A-2
5 A-2
5 A-2
4" / 12"
4" / 12"
4" / 12"

EXISTING HOUSE
4" / 12"
4" / 12"
a California corporation ● Lenny Grant, Architect C26973 ● Jerry Michael, PE 36895, LS 6276 ● Jeff Ferber , LA 2844
C:\Users\bwwalker\Documents\2080-01-Calle_Real-ADU-Building_Central_bwwalkerLVF7H.rvt 12/10/2020 6:54:40 PM
A-22080-01-RS20 - CALLE REAL ADU

PLANS - ELEVATIONS & SECTIONS
12/10/2020
1/4" = 1'-0"A-2 A-2
GROUND FLOOR PLAN - SCHEMATIC1
1/4" = 1'-0"A-2 A-2
SECTION 2 SCHEMATIC5
1/4" = 1'-0"A-2 A-2
SECTION 1 SCHEMATIC6

AREAS CONDITIONED
Comments Area
ADU GROUND FLOOR 485 SF
485 SF

AREAS UNCONDITIONED
FRONT PORCH 31 SF
PATIO 115 SF
1/4" = 1'-0"A-2 A-2
ROOF PLAN SCHEMATIC2

CLIENT REVIEW
2418 Calle Real
Accessory Dwelling Unit Next Up:

Our Subconsultant
19 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES Timothy is the owner of Carstairs Energy, Inc., a full-service energy consulting company based in San Luis Obispo. Carstairs Energy prepares energy compliance reports and works with building departments, architects, engineers, and homeowners to ensure compliance for each project. Timothy Carstairs is a Cabec Certified Energy Analyst and a licensed HERS Rater through CalCerts. He started Carstairs Energy in 2005 and was one of the first title 24 companies to offer services online. Carstairs Energy not only provides Title 24 Residential and Commercial Energy compliance, but they also provide HVAC Design Services including ACCA Manual J, D, S, and Solar Design services throughout California as well as HERS Testing and Green Point Rating local to the San Luis Obispo area.

Relevant Projects Quotes
• Agoura Hills Pre-Approved
Building Plans
• Coastal Community Builders,
The Meadows at Rice Ranch,
Orcutt
• Coastal Community Builders,
Vineyard Creek, Templeton
• McCarthy Homes Purisima Hills,
Coastal Collection, Lompoc
• I’ve worked with Carstairs for the
past 5 years. They have always
been very knowledgeable on every
project I ask them about. They
have always been on time, and
ready to answer questions. I would
highly recommend them.
~Gregory Soto, Architect
• Carstairs Energy, Wow. Our
Company, Crizer Construction Inc,
has been in business for almost
35 years this year and I have to
say that Carstairs Energy, Tim
Carstairs, is one of the most
attentive professionals we have
worked with...The response time,
when working with Carstairs
Energy, will be as fast as any
professional in the business. I
highly recommend that you work
with Carstairs Energy on your
next project.
19 Years of Experience
Education
• Bachelor of Science, Accounting
University of Phoenix,
Phoenix, AZ
Licenses, Accreditations,
and Affiliations
• Cabec Certified Energy Analyst
• CalCerts Certified HERS I and
HERS II Rater
• Licensed HVAC Contractor
(CSLB#926170)
• Certified Green Point Rater
(Build It Green)
• Real Estate Broker (BRE
#01855310)
TIMOTHY CARSTAIRS | CEA, HERS, GPR
Title 24 Energy Compliance

20 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES HOW RRM’S EXPERIENCE, TECHNICAL &
PROFESSIONAL SKILLS MEET CITY’S GOALS
RRM has worked with the following public agencies in developing ADU plans:
• City of Agoura Hills
• City of Concord
• City of Dublin
• County of Mono
• City of Newport Beach
• City of Porterville
• County of San Luis Obispo
• City of San Ramon
• County of Santa Cruz
• City of Stanford
• City of Walnut Creek
Along with the agencies listed above, RRM has worked with over 20 private clients on developing ADU plans for their residences.

RRM proposes to work with the City to develop a series of pre-approved prescriptive ADUs and provide for homeowners to streamline the processing of utilizing those plans for their unique and individual needs.

RRM will work with City staff to refine the program and scope for the proposed ADUs to provide the best fit for the City of Culver City. Discussions with staff and previous project experience suggest alternate or additional configurations that may better serve the community. RRM’s scope of services, beginning on page 27, provides for possible alternatives which will be evaluated during the initial tasks of the project. RRM’s community-based design will help assure that these plans have elevation options that allow for personal taste and are appropriate to the community’s architectural vernacular.

RRM achieves a high project efficiency and coordination level due to the multidisciplinary service structure.

We provide implementable solutions due to a single-line in-house responsibility that allows the project manager to coordinate most of the components of a project directly. While most of the primary scope will be provided in-house by RRM Architecture, Planning, and Structural Engineering, there will be times when outside consultants and City coordination will be required. RRM may need to coordinate and meet with City staff, various departments, and interest groups in addition to those specifically outlined in our scope.

Next Up:

Experience Case Studies
21 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

MYRTLE STREET

RESIDENCE
(ACCESSORY DWELLING

UNIT ADDITION)

ARROYO GRANDE, CA

WEST CREEK
Multifamily Subdivision with ADUs
San Luis Obispo, CA

SERRA MEADOWS
Multifamily Subdivision with ADUs
San Luis Obispo, CA

CITYWIDE
Design Guidelines and Objective
Design Standards, Yucaipa, CA

MARTIN RESIDENCE
ADU
Atascadero, CA

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS

KITCHEN
BATH
FLEX
ROOM
DINING
LIVING
LIVING
BED
BATH
2-CAR
GARAGE
KIT.

PORCH

OPTIONAL FIREPLACE

OPTIONAL ACCESS DOOR
W/D

UP FRONT
YARD
BACK
YARD
P.
7PLAN 2522 STYLE 1
1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN
4-10 CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES | CITY OF YUCAIPA

4.4 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
All accessory dwelling units (ADUs) shall be compatible in architectural style and secondary in massing to the primary unit. Accessory dwelling units shall conform to the standards in section 84.0570, Accessory Dwelling Units, of the Yucaipa Development Code.

4.4.1 Siting, Materials, and Details

1. Accessory dwelling units shall be constructed of quality materials and should have an appearance of permanence.

2. Form and architectural style of accessory dwelling units shall emulate the primary structure.

3. Architectural details such as windows, doors, wall treatments, colors, and materials shall be selected to ensure consistency with the selected and universally recognized architectural style.

4. Accessory dwelling units may be located entirely within the primary residence, attached, or detached in a separate structure behind the residence.

Attached accessory structure constructed above an
existing garage
Attached accessory structure in rear

CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Yucaipa
Adopted June 2019

SERRA MEADOWS
page 9
Plan 1 - Floor Plans
ENT.

40.00'
100.00'
100.00'

40.00'
KIT.

DINING
LIVING
PORCH
GARAGE
MIN.
3' - 0"
MIN.
3' - 0"
ALLEY
10'-0"
M
IN.
3'-0"
14'-11
1/2"
M. BED
UTIL.

CL.

CL.

PWDR.

PATIO

STORAGE

UNDER STAIR

STORAGE
CL.

P: (805) 543-1794 | F: (805) 543-4609 | www.rrmdesign.com 3765 South Higuera St., Ste. 102, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 A California Corporation | Victor Montgomery, Architect #C11090 | Jerry Michael, PE #36895, LS #6276 | Jeff Ferber, LA #2844 P1.11011010 - MARGARITA AREA HOUSING

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
07/06/2011

SINGLE FAMILY HOME
ALLEY LOADED 40'X100' MIN.

LOT AREA: 5,000 SF
LOT COVERAGE: 29%
RESIDENCE: 1,565 SF
FIRST FLOOR: 1,065 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 500 SF
GARAGE: 462 SF
TOTAL: 2,340 SF
0 12 14 168

GRAPHIC SCALE

FIRST FLOOR
CARRIAGE UNIT: 462 SF
ENT.

40.00'
100.00'
100.00'

40.00'
KIT.

DINING
LIVING
PORCH
GARAGE
MIN.
3' - 0"
MIN.
3' - 0"
ALLEY
10'-0"
M
IN.
3'-0"
14'-11
1/2"
M. BED
UTIL.

CL.

CL.

PWDR.

PATIO

STORAGE

UNDER STAIR

STORAGE
CL.

P: (805) 543-1794 | F: (805) 543-4609 | www.rrmdesign.com 3765 South Higuera St., Ste. 102, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 A California Corporation | Victor Montgomery, Architect #C11090 | Jerry Michael, PE #36895, LS #6276 | Jeff Ferber, LA #2844 P1.11011010 - MARGARITA AREA HOUSING

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
07/06/2011

SINGLE FAMILY HOME
ALLEY LOADED 40'X100' MIN.

LOT AREA: 5,000 SF
LOT COVERAGE: 29%
RESIDENCE: 1,565 SF
FIRST FLOOR: 1,065 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 500 SF
GARAGE: 462 SF
TOTAL: 2,340 SF
0 12 14 168

GRAPHIC SCALE

FIRST FLOOR
CARRIAGE UNIT: 462 SF

FIRST FLOOR

SERRA MEADOWS
page 10
Plan 1 - Floor Plans
BED
BATH

DECKLIVING
KIT.

BED
BATHCL.

BED
CL.

CL.

STUDY
DECK
BATH
STUDIO
P: (805) 543-1794 | F: (805) 543-4609 | www.rrmdesign.com 3765 South Higuera St., Ste. 102, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 A California Corporation | Victor Montgomery, Architect #C11090 | Jerry Michael, PE #36895, LS #6276 | Jeff Ferber, LA #2844 P1.21011010 - MARGARITA AREA HOUSING

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
07/06/2011

SECOND FLOOR

STUDIO OPTION

SECOND FLOOR
MARTIN

RESIDENCE
(ACCESSORY DWELLING

UNIT ADDITION)

ATASCADERO, CA
This one bedroom, 499 sf unit is a second story, over
garage ADU in a barn style to respond to the village
historic district design guidelines and complement
the 140 year old historic stone house on the site. The
ADU has a separate exterior entry with separately
controlled water, heat, and electrical. The unit
features a full efficiency kitchen, large living area, a ¾ bath, as well as two decks - one on the street and a
covered deck to the rear of the unit.

Constructed as a true mother-in-law unit, Scott
designed the addition to his house to function
for a senior with Multiple Sclerosis. Keeping in
mind aging, place, and privacy, the plan created
separate living and sleeping spaces, while
common dining and gathering space anchors the
heart of the home.

RRM Design Group's own Scott Martin
(Principal-in-Charge) and Randy Russom
(Project Architect) live in homes with
accessory dwelling units that they
designed themselves.
22 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

PORTERVILLE

ACCESSORY & MULTIFAMILY

DWELLING UNIT PLANS

PORTERVILLE, CA
NOTABLE INFO AND STATS:

Client: City of Porterville
Timeline: 2021-Present
RRM SERVICES PROVIDED:

Architecture, Planning,
Structural Engineering
The County of Porterville retained RRM for
the purpose of developing designs and plans for
three Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and
eight multifamily prototype buildings. The ADUs
ranged in size from studio to one-bedroom,
allowing different lot configurations and places
based on homeowners' needs. In addition, the
multifamily building prototypes are refined to
maximize the number of building typologies
that can serve the changing population while
maintaining the community character at the core
of the work effort.
2AISSUE DATE: 07/08/2021

PORTERVILLE ADU PROTOTYPES

SCHEMATIC PLANS - DETACHED ADUS
24' - 0"
8' - 0" 8' - 0" 8' - 0"
20' - 0"
BED
9-7x10-0
CL
5-6' LONG
BATH
8-6x6-8

KITCHEN/DINING
14-0x9-5
LIVING

POSSIBLE ISLAND

FOR MORE STORAGE

AND SEATING

IF ADJACENT TO

EXISTING HOUSE, NO
WINDOW (1-HR WALL)
CL

OPT PORCH
P

OPT SLIDER OR
WINDOW

OPT WALL &

DOOR TO
CREATE 1-BED

OPT PORCH
24' - 0"
14' - 9" 9' - 3"
4' - 6" 10' - 1" 2' - 10" 7' - 1"

OPTIONAL
COLUMN
A11778-01-UR19 - PROTOTYPE ADU

SCHEMATIC PLAN-ONE-BEDROOM SQUARE
05/14/2021
+/- 450 SF
PROPOSED IN SCOPE: 450 SF
SHOWN: 526 SF
STUDIO: 526 SF
ISSUE DATE: 07/08/2021

PORTERVILLE ADU PROTOTYPES
SCHEMATIC PLANS - DETACHED ADUS 2.1A
STYLE A: SPANISH COLONIAL REVIVAL STYLE B: CRAFTSMAN
STYLE C: AGRARIAN STYLE D: CALIFORNIA RANCH
STUDIO: 526 SF
4B

PORTERVILLE MULTI-FAMILY PROTOTYPES
SCHEMATIC PLANS - MULTI-FAMILY UNIT PLANS ISSUE DATE: 07/27/2021

KITCHEN/DINING
15-2x13-8
POWDER
5-0x5-0
LIVING
15-2x13-9

STORAGE
CL
PANTRY

PARTY WALL
ALT. PARTY WALL
& WINDOW
ALT. PARTY WALL
& WINDOW
ALT. PARTY
WALL
& WINDOW
BATH
8-5x5-0
W.I.C.

L
20' - 0"
BEDROOM 1
12-9x11-4
BATH
8-4x8-3
HALL
CL.

BEDROOM 2
11-3x10-4
30' - 0"
LIVING
15-2x13-9

STORAGE
CL
A40243-15 - PORTERVILLE TOWNHOMES

INTERIOR UNIT
06/25/2021
3/16" = 1'-0"2 LEVEL 1 - FLOOR PLAN
3/16" = 1'-0"3 LEVEL 2 - FLOOR PLAN
AREAS
Comments Area
SECOND FLOOR 557 SF
GROUND FLOOR 600 SF
Grand total: 2 1157 SF
3/16" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 1 - ALT ENTRY
UNIT D - 2-BEDROOM - 1,155 SF
GROUND FLOOR: 555 SF
SECOND FLOOR: 600 SF
23 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

SAN RAMON

PRE-APPROVED ADU PROGRAM

SAN RAMON, CA
NOTABLE INFO AND STATS:

Client: City of San Ramon
Timeline: 2021-Present
RRM SERVICES PROVIDED:

Architecture, Planning,
Landscape Architecture,
Structural Engineering
The County of San Ramon hired RRM to develop
floor plans and elevation designs and Prototype
Construction Documents for three one-bedroom
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The ADUs range
in size from 560-728 square feet, providing a range
of efficiency and unique footprints. The goals of
the design process included maintaining County
character in elevation design, increasing density and
available one-bedroom rentals, and creating cost-
conscious designs for the homeowner that are both
comfortable and functional.

24 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES DUBLIN

OBJECTIVE DESIGN

STANDARDS AND

ADU PROTOTYPES

DUBLIN, CA
NOTABLE INFO AND STATS:

Client: County of Dublin
Timeline: 2019-Present
RRM SERVICES PROVIDED:

Architecture, Planning,
Landscape Architecture,
Structural Engineering
The County of Dublin hired RRM Design Group to develop clearly defined objective design standards endorsed by the community and decision-makers that can be applied to multifamily and mixed- use residential projects. The intent of the project is to ensure that new residential development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods, that quality materials are used, that building form and scale are appropriate to the site, and that development complies with the intent of SB35 laws to facilitate and expedite construction of housing.

The final product will include clearly written standards with easy-to- use graphics. Given the lack of large sites for new housing projects, the County is promoting the development of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). To assist in this effort, RRM is developing prototype plans including elevations,
floor plans for garage
conversion, and
building permit plans
for ADUs that will
save property owners
money, expedite the
permit process, and
help ensure well-
designed ADUs are
built.

CITY OF DUBLIN ADU PROGRAM
STAND-ALONE TWO BEDROOM - 973 S.F.
%('5220

[

/,9,1*

[

5()
',1,1*

[

.,7&+(1

[

(175<
%$7+

[

&/2
&/2
3266,%/(,6/$1'
)25025(
6725$*(
(1685(:,1'2:,1
%('5220)25(*5(66
&2817(5'(37+
5()
67$1'$5'*$6
25(/(&75&5$1*(
67$1'$5'6,1.
237,21$/
',6+:$6+(5





%('5220

[

&/2

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
1/4” = 1’-0” (8.5X11 SHEET)
024 8
25 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

WEST CREEK

RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
(INCLUDED MULTI-FAMILY AND

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS)

SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
NOTABLE INFO AND STATS:

Client: Robins|Reed
Timeline: 2014-Present
RRM SERVICES PROVIDED:

Architecture, Planning,
Landscape Architecture,
Structural Engineering
West Creek is a residential subdivision covering

18.29 acres in the County of San Luis Obispo that
provides 172 residential units in multifamily and
single-family homes with Accessory Dwelling Units.

The 105 multifamily units include 35 studio units, 63
two-bedroom units, and 7 one-bedroom units with a
density of 27.5 units per acre. The 67 single-family units are 3 bed/2 ½ bath homes with attached garages and
include 44 “parkway” units with a density of 8.54 units per acre. The project encompasses two large parcels
that were combined into a single project resulting in
a more complete design solution which allows the
project to meet the unit count targeted in the Orcutt
Area Specific Plan while providing additional open
space and community amenities.

26 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES The County of Santa Cruz retained RRM to prepare
ADU Plans for three sizes of ADU Building Plans
that will be “pre-plan checked” and approved by
the County for use by members of the public who
are interested in constructing an ADU on property
located within the unincorporated County of Santa
Cruz area.

RRM services include meetings with County
staff, meetings with members of the public and
stakeholders, definition of the ADU types and
alternate design styles created, and production of
the ADU plans for plan-checking and for making
available on the County’s website for use by the
public.

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

ADU PRE-APPROVED BUILDING

PLAN OPTIONS

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CA
NOTABLE INFO AND STATS:

Client: County of Santa Cruz
Dates: 2021-Present
RRM SERVICES PROVIDED:

Architecture, Planning,
Structural Engineering
27 SECTION 2 | Qualifications | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

NEWPORT BEACH

PERMIT-READY ADU PLANS &

PUBLIC OUTREACH IMPROVEMENT

NEWPORT BEACH, CA
NOTABLE INFO AND STATS:

Client: City of Newport Beach
Timeline: 2022-Present
RRM SERVICES PROVIDED:

Architecture, Planning,
Structural Engineering
RRM Design Group was retained to prepare complete
building plans for ADUs. The City of Newport Beach
intends to purchase the completed building plans and
make them available to the public, free of charge, as
an incentive to promote the construction of ADU
housing that is more affordable, by design, due to
the size of the units and preparation of pre-approved
building plans. RRM is also preparing and helping to
launch a public outreach campaign to inform property
owners and the development community of the
benefits of ADUs, promote City incentives, such as
permit fee waiver program and permit-ready plans,
and streamline the development process.

W/D
DW
EXTERIOR - 5 1/2" WOOD STUD W/ PLYWOOD SHEATHING AND
STUCCO, ONE LAYER GYPSUM WALL BOARD INTERIOR.

INTERIOR - 5 1/2" WOOD STUD W/ONE LAYER GYPSUM WALL BOARD EACH SIDE.

A.

SOLID CORE
WOOD.

B.

DOUBLE SLIDING

INTERIOR
C.

SLIDING GLASS
EXTERIOR.

E.

INTERIOR CLOSET
SINGLE
F.

INTERIOR POCKET
A.

SINGLE HUNG.

B.

SLIDER.

1.11.1 1.21.2
4' - 9"

1.A

1.A

1.B

1.B
16' - 0"
6' - 5 1/2" 9' - 6 1/2"
28' - 0"
6' - 6" 9' - 0"
5 A1-301
1 A1-301

CAL RANCHCONTEMP

FARMHOUSE

COASTAL

COTTAGE
2 A1-301
6 A1-301

CAL RANCH CONTEMP

FARMHOUSE

COASTAL

COTTAGE

CALIFORNIA
RANCH

CONTEMP

FARMHOUSE

COASTAL

COTTAGE

CAL RANCH CONTEMP

FARMHOUSE

COASTAL
COTTAGE 0102
03 04
05 02
01 03
04 05
LIVING
STUDIO

LAUNDRY
BATH
W.I.C.
1 A1-201
1 A1-203
1 A1-202
5' - 10" 10' - 2"
13' - 8" 8' - 6" 5' - 10"
7' - 9"
18' - 0" 10' - 0"
6' - 0"
B06
B10
B02
A05A01
B02
A06
B18
B47
B38
B41
B41
4 A1-201
4 A1-202
4 A1-203
2 A1-201
2 A1-202
2 A1-203
3 A1-201
3 A1-203
3 A1-202
3 A1-301
4 A1-301

1.11.1 1.A

1.A

1.B

1.B
06 16' - 0"
6' - 6" 9' - 6"

1.2 1.B
01 02COVERED
PORCH
17' - 6"
2' - 0" 6' - 0" 2' - 0" 7' - 6"
5' - 7"
4' - 8" 1' - 0"
5' - 8"

1.2 1.B

COVERED
PORCH
17' - 8 1/2"
8"12"8"8" 12" 8"
5' - 0"
01 1.2

1.B
01 02

COVERED
PORCH
6' - 10" 10' - 2"
17' - 0"
5' - 0"
NO. REVISION DATE

PROJECT MANAGER

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
DATE

PROJECT NUMBER
SHEET
NOT F
OR

CONSTRUCT
ION
rrmdesign.com | (805) 543-1794
3765 S. Higuera, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
RRM DESIGN GROUP COPYRIGHT 2021

RRM IS A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

CONSULTANT
AGENCY

THE INCLUDED DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, IDEAS, DESIGNS AND ARRANGEMENTS

REPRESENTED THEREBY ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPER TY OF RRM DESIGN

GROUP AND NO PART THEREOF SHALL BE COPIED, DISCLOSE D TO OTHERS OR

USED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY WORK OR PROJECT OTHER T HAN THE SPECIFIED

PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND DEVEL OPED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF RRM DESIGN GROUP. VISUAL CONTAC T WITH THESE DRAWINGS

OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE CONCLUSIVE EVIDE NCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. SUBMITTAL OF THESE DOCUMENTS FO R PUBLIC AGENCY REVIEW SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED A WAIVER OF RRM DESIGN GROU P'S RIGHTS.

C:\Users\mclelland\OneDrive - RRM Design Group\Documents\2516-01-CU21_Newport Beach ADUs_2020_CENTRAL_mclellandYC8WB.rvt 9/30/2022 5:57:23 PM

FLOOR PLANS

NEWPORT BEACH ADU

PROTOTYPES

NEWPORT BEACH, CA
2264-01-CU20
A1-101
4/25/22
A01 30" WIDE FREE STANDING ELECTRIC RANGE OVEN. VENT TO EXTERIOR.

A05 REFRIGERATOR LOCATION. PROVIDE 37" SPACE WITH ROUGH PLUMBING FOR ICE MAKER (RECESS IN WALL).

A06 STACKED WASHER/DRYER MACHINE LOCATION. PROVIDE WASTE AND WATER IN RECESSED WALL BOX. PROVIDE DRYER VENT. VENT TO OUTSIDE AIR THROUGH EXTERIOR WALL. DRYER VENT 4" MIN

DIAMETER TO EXTERIOR WITH SCREENED AND ONE DIRECTIONAL
VENT GATE. MAX LENGTH TO NOT EXCEED 14' WITH A MAX OF 2 90-DEGREE BENDS. TERMINATION SHALL BE 3' MINIMUM FROM
OPERABLE OPENING IN EXTERIOR WALL.

B02 PEDESTAL SINK. REFER TO WATER EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS ON CALGREEN CODE NOTES SHEETS.

B06 32" x 60" x 72" TUB AND SHOWER COMBINATION. MODEL BY BUILDER. WATER RESISTENT FINISH TO EXTEND TO 72" ABOVE
FLOOR. SHOWER DOOR IF APPLICABLE TO BE TEMPERED GLASS.

B10 WASHING MACHINE W/ RECESSED WASHING MACHINE OUTLET BOX

WITH DRAIN
B18 ELECTRIC PANEL TBD.

B38 MULTI-ZONE HEAT PUMP CONDENSING UNIT. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION OF INDOOR FAN FAN COIL UNITS. REFER TO TITLE 24 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. PROVIDE CONCRETE PAD MIN. 6" LARGER THAN UNIT IN EACH DIRECTION, 3" MIN. ABOVE GRADE.

B47
1/4" = 1'-0"A1-201A1-101
PLAN 1 - GROUND FLOOR PLAN (NO PORCH)1
cici TYPE
DOOR

REMARKSWIDTH HEIGHT
01 A 3' - 0" 6' - 8"
02 A 2' - 6" 6' - 8"
03 F 2' - 8" 6' - 8"
04 A 2' - 6" 6' - 8"
05 A 2' - 6" 6' - 8"
06 C 5' - 0" 6' - 8"
NO. TYPE

SIZE HEAD

HEIGHT REMARKSWIDTH HEIGHT
01 B 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 6' - 8"
02 B 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 6' - 8"
03 B 2' - 0" 2' - 0" 6' - 8"
04 B 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 6' - 8"
05 B 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 6' - 8"
1/4" = 1'-0"A1-201A1-101
PLAN 1 - OPT. SLIDER2
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"A1-201 A1-101
PLAN 1 - PORCH OPTIONS3

1. REFER TO GENERAL NOTES SHEET G-101 AND G-102 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.

FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES

7. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FRAMING UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE.

2. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

3. REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION IF PROVIDED.

4. REFER TO MECHANICAL PLANS, DRAWINGS OR REPORTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

5. REFER TO PLUMBING PLANS OR DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION IF PROVIDED.

6. ALL FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT IS BY OWNER AND IS SHOWN FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES ONLY.

8. PROVIDE ADEQUATE BLOCKING IN WALLS FOR CABINETS AND OTHER WALL

MOUNTED ACCESSORIES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO HANDRAILS, SHELVING AND BATHROOM FIXTURES.

9. PROVIDE FIREBLOCKING FOR WALL CAVITIES THAT EXCEED 2019 CBC

HEIGHT LIMITATIONS

10. DOOR AND WINDOW DIMENSIONS ARE CENTERED AT OPENINGS

11. WHERE DOOR IS LOCATED WITHOUT DIMENSION AT THE CORNER OF A ROOM IT SHALL BE 4" FROM FACE OF FRAMING OF ADJACENT WALL TO

ROUGH DOOR OPENING

12. SEE CODE ANALYSIS FOR LOCATIONS OF FIRE PARTITIONS AND FIRE

BARRIERS

13. WHERE RECESSED FIXTURES OCCUR IN WALLS OR HORIZONTAL

ASSEMBLIES, THE FIRE RATING OF THOSE ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE

MAINTAINED

14. AT ALL PENETRATIONS AND INTERSECTIONS OF FIRE-RATED PARTITIONS,

PROVIDE FIRE SEALANT AND/OR FIRE STOPPING TO MAINTAIN CONTINUITY

OF PARTITION RATING

FLOOR PLAN LEGEND

WINDOW SCHEDULE

DOOR SCHEDULE

KEYNOTES

1. FIRE RATED DOOR. REFER TO GENERAL DOOR NOTE #5

2. GLAZING PER DOOR TYPES. TEMPERED.

3. PROVIDE 100 SQ INCHES OF VENTING IN DOOR OR BY OTHER APPROVED MEANS.

4. OPTIONAL DOOR.

5. OPTIONAL GLAZING IN DOOR. TEMPERED (BOTH PANES).

DOOR REMARKS

1. REFER TO GENERAL NOTES ON SHEET G-101 FOR ADDITIONAL

REQUIREMENTS

2. REFER TO FLOOR PLANS FOR WINDOW LOCATIONS.

3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT ROUGH OPENING SIZES WITH WINDOW

MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO FABRICATION OF ROUGH OPENINGS.

4. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACTUAL WINDOW SIZES TO FIT FINISH OPENING PRIOR TO FABRICATION OF WINDOW AND FINISH OPENING.

5. HEAD HEIGHT MEASURED FROM FF UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

6. REFER TO ENERGY COMPLIANCE REPORTS FOR U-FACTOR, SHGC AND ADDITIONAL WINDOW REQUIREMENTS.

7. ALL GLAZING IS DOUBLE PANE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

8. PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL WINDOW UNITS

9. REFER TO WINDOW TYPES LEGEND FOR GLAZING.

10. REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE AND WINDOW TYPES LEGEND FO R FURTHER INFORMATION.

11. WINDOWS BETWEEN CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED SPACE S SHALL BE CAULKED, GASKETED, WEATHER-STRIPPED OR OTHERWISE SEALED.

12. SAFETY GLAZING NOTATED WITH "T"

WINDOW GENERAL NOTES

1. EGRESS WINDOW. MUST MEET CBC REQUIREMENTS.

WINDOW REMARKS

1. REFER TO GENERAL NOTES SHEET G-102 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.

2. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION OF DOORS.

3. VERIFY ROUGH OPENING SIZE WITH DOOR MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

4. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACTUAL DOOR SIZE TO FIT FINISH OPENING PRIOR TO FABRICATION OF DOOR AND FINISH OPENING.

5. FIRE RATED DOORS SHALL BE SOLID WOOD OR SOLID HONEYCOMB CORE STEEL DOOR 1-3/8" THICK OR COMPLIANT WITH 2019 CRC SECTION R302.5.1.

DOORS SHALL BE SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LATCHING WITH WEATHER STRIPPING TO BE TIGHT FITTING.

6. GLAZING IN DOORS SHALL BE TEMPERED PER SECTION R308.4.1.

DOOR GENERAL NOTES

DOOR LEGEND

WINDOW LEGEND

CALIFORNIA RANCH

COASTAL COTTAGE

CONTEMPORARY

FARMHOUSE
28 SECTION 1 | Scope and Fee | PROPOSAL FOR ADU PROTOTYPES

CONCORD
ADUs STANDARD

DRAWINGS DEVELOPMENT

CONCORD, CA
NOTABLE INFO AND STATS:

Client: City of Concord
Timeline: 2021-Present
RRM SERVICES PROVIDED:

Architecture, Planning,
Structural Engineering
RRM Design Group was retained to provide
construction drawing sets for detached ADUs for
the City of Concord. The City recognized that ADUs
represent a substantial opportunity to realize its
goals as outlined in its Housing Element by providing
diverse housing options to meet the needs of smaller
households, young adults, seniors, persons with
special needs, extended families, and households
with lower incomes. RRM prepared a collection of
architectural and building permit-ready plan sets,
including structural calculations, for detached ADUs
of varying unit types, architectural designs, and sizes. 6AD-
2ND PLANNING REVIEW DATE: 12/09/21
CONCORD ADU PROTOTYPES 2208-01-CU21
TYPICAL DETAILS - ENTRY OPT. W/ NO COVERED PORCH
*FINAL COLOR SELECTION WILL BE DETERMINED BY EXISTING PRIMARY RESIDENCE COLOR SCHEME, AND MAY VARY FROM THE COLORS SHOWN. THE PROPERTY OWNER MUST PICK THE STYLE MOST SUITED TOWARDS THE STYLE OF THEIR EISTING HOME. MATERIAL SELECTION IS LIMITED TO THE SPECIFIC MATERIAL TYPES CALLED OUT IN CONSTRUCTION DOC- UMENTS, IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH WUI AND BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. double-framed wall bumpout
double-framed wall bumpout
brick veneer wainscot
shake style fiber cement panels
concrete stoop
concrete stoop
sconce exterior fixture
sconce exterior fixture
hardie fiber cement trim
wood-look fiber cement trim
6x outlooker
4x4 shaped wood brace
6” hardie fiber cement siding
8” hardie fiber cement siding
double-framed wall bumpout
w/ plaster stucco exterior finish
concrete stoop
4x4 wood brace
sconce exterior fixture
hardie fiber cement fascia
spanish clay roof tiles
2x4 wood trellis members
wrought iron gable detail
double-framed wall bumpout
w/ hardie fiber cement siding
concrete stoop
Next Up:

Our References

THANK YOU