2023_08-14 ATT1 Application Approval.pdf — City Council Meeting Agenda, August 14, 2023

9770 Culver Boulevard, Culver City, California 90232

Yanni Demitri, PE, TE, MSCE
Public Works Director and
City Engineer
(310) 253-5600

Mate Gaspar, P.E.

Engineering Services Manager
FAX (310) 253-5626

____________________________

Culver City Employees take pride in effectively providing the highest levels of service to enrich the quality of life for the community by building on our tradition of more than a century of public service, by our present commitment, and by our dedication to meet the challenges of the future.

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

May 3, 2023

Brad Ladua
Sure Site Consulting Group
200 Spectrum Drive, Suite 1700
Irvine, CA 92618
Email: [email protected]

SUBJECT: Notice of Approval of Application for Crown Castle Small Cell CULVER_010 – 11317 Washington Place, Culver City Permit Number U22-0413 Dear Mr. Ladua:

Upon review of Crown Castle’s application and supporting materials, we make the following findings:

1. Per the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the environmental regulations of the City above-referenced wireless facilities qualifiy as categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15303(e), New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures;

2. The above-referenced wireless facilities are not detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare;

3. These facilities comply with all applicable provisions of CCMC Section 11.20.065 and with all applicable design and development standards; and

4. These facilities meet applicable requirements and standards of state and federal law.

As a result, we approve Crown Castle’s above-referenced application. This approval will be contingent upon Crown Castle complying with all con ditions of the related Wireless Utilty Permit, which can be found here: Wireless Conditions .

Sincerely,

Sammy Romo, P.E.

Senior Civil Engineer

CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

LOCATION MAP
PROJECT INFORMATIONJURISDICTION:CULVER CITYSITE LATITUDE:34.007113SITE LONGITUDE:-118.416993POLE OWNER: CULVER CITYNEAREST PARCEL:4214-003-022NEAREST ADDRESS:11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066APPLICANT:CROWN CASTLE200 SPECTRUM CENTER DR, SUITE 1800IRVINE, CA 92618

NOT TO SCALE
NODE: CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A11317 WASHINGTON PL. (SEE A-1) Crown CastleJurisdiction:CULVER CITYProject Number:CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - APole ID: NO TAG11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066(34.007113, -118.416993) R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
CODE COMPLIANCEALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWINGCODES ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING INTHESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOTCONFORMING TO THESE CODES.·2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES, VOL. 1 & 2·2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE·2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE·2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE·2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE·2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODESIN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT, THE MOST RESTRICTIVE CODE SHALLPREVAIL N

SCOPE OF WORK
SHEET NO:DESCRIPTIONDRAWING INDEX
T-1TITLE SHEETT-2GENERAL NOTESA-1A-2ELEVATIONSD-1DETAILSD-2DETAILS TCP-1TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS & NOTESTCP-2TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN INSTALLATION OF POWER SUPPLY FOR CROWN CASTLE TOINSTALL THE FOLLOWING:

A-3ELEVATIONS CONTACT INFORMATIONSITE PLAN & ENLARGED SITE PLANT-3GENERAL REQUIREMENT-U/G UTILITY AVOIDANCE E-1ELECTRICAL DETAILSG-1GROUNDING DETAILS

SITE EXHIBIT PHOTO
A&E PROJECT MANAGER:XD INDUSTRIES25422 TRABUCO ROADSUITE 105-627LAKE FOREST, CA 92630CONTACT: RAUL SANCHEZPHONE: (714) 928-4935CONSTRUCTION MANAGER:CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL200 SPECTRUM CENTER DR, SUITE 1800IRVINE, CA 92618CONTACT: PAUL GALANTEPHONE: (714) 931-4908 PROJECT MANAGER:CROWN CASTLE200 SPECTRUM CENTER DRIVE,SUITE 1900IRVINE, CA 92618CONTACT: CAMERON DANCHOPHONE: (951) 775-8688 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION MANAGER:CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL:CONTACT: JOHN HENRY LAMPPHONE: (949) 910-1989UTILITY RELATIONS SUPERVISOR: CONTACT: MICHAEL BONASPHONE: (949) 813-6905 T-1
CROWN CASTLESMALL CELL SITECA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
S-1POLE SPECIFICATIONS-2FOUNDATION DETAILS
EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED:·REMOVE (1) EXISTING CONCRETE STREET LIGHTPOLE WITH FOUNDATION·INSTALL (1) NEW CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE·INSTALL (1) RADIO SHROUD ASSEMBLY·INSTALL (3) INTEGRATED 5G ANTENNAS·INSTALL (2) RF REQUIRED SIGNS·INSTALL (1) 5/8"Ø X 8' GROUND ROD·INSTALL (1) 24X36 HANDHOLE·INSTALL (1) WTR BOX PLACED INSIDE PROPOSEDHANDHOLE S-3FOUNDATION DETAILS
P-1PHOTOSIMULATIONSP-2PHOTOSIMULATIONSP-3PHOTOSIMULATIONS CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

GENERAL NOTES
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES:TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL, PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF FINAL IMPROVEMENTS,SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR QUALIFIED PERSON AS INDICATED BELOW:1.ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES "LAND DEVELOPMENT MANUAL, STORMWATER STANDARDS" MUST BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OFTHE PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE EROSION CONTROL PLANAND/OR WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN (WPCP), IF APPLICABLE.2.FOR STORM DRAIN INLETS, PROVIDE A GRAVEL BAG SILT BASIN IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM OFINLET AS INDICATED ON DETAILS.3.THE CONTRACTOR OF QUALIFIED PERSON SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANUP OF SILTAND MUD ON ADJACENT STREET(S) AND STORM DRAIN SYSTEM DUE TO CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SILT AND DEBRIS AFTER EACH MAJOR RAINFALL.5.EQUIPMENT AND WORKERS FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AT ALLTIMES DURING THE RAIN SEASON.6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION. SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES TOWORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER OR RESIDENT ENGINEERAFTER EACH RUN-OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ASMAY BE REQUIRED BY THE RESIDENT ENGINEER DUE TO UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES,WHICH MAY ARISE.8.ALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES PROVIDED PER THE APPROVEDIMPROVEMENT PLAN SHALL BE INCORPORATED HERON. ALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROLFOR INTERIM CONDITIONS SHALL BE DONE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE RESIDENTENGINEER.9.ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHOWN SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACHWORKING DAY WHEN RAIN IS IMMINENT.10.THE CONTRACTOR WILL ARRANGE FOR WEEKLY MEETINGS DURING OCTOBER 1ST TO APRIL30TH FOR PROJECT TEAM (GENERAL CONTRACTOR, QUALIFIED PERSON, EROSION CONTROLSUBCONTRACTOR IF ANY, ENGINEER OF WORK, OWNER/DEVELOPER AND THE RESIDENTENGINEER)11.TO EVALUATE THE ADEQUACY OF THE EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ANDOTHER RELATED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.NOTES:1.CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.2.CONTRACTOR TO PLACE SANDBAGS AROUND ANY/ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS TO PREVENTCONTAMINATED WATER.3.SPOILS PILE WILL BE COVERED AND CONTAINED AND STREET WILL BE SWEPT AND CLEANEDAS NEEDED.4.CONTRACTOR REPAIR DAMAGED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SATISFACTION OF THECITY ENGINEER.5.CURB & GUTTER TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE, SIDEWALK TO BE REPLACED TO THESATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER.6.THE CONTRACTION SHALL RESTORE THE ROADWAY BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITIONSATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ENGINEER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO PAVING, STRIPING,BIKE LANES, PAVEMENT LEGENDS, SIGNS, AND TRAFFIC LOOP DETECTORS.7.SIDEWALK SHALL BE RESTORED/REPLACED PER CITY OF LOS ANGELES STANDARDDRAWINGS.8.PEDESTRIAN RAMP WILL NOT BE DISTURBED. PEDESTRIAN RAMP WILL NOT BE DISTURBED.9.TO OBTAIN A PERMIT TO ACCESS WATER FROM A FIRE HYDRANT, CONTACT THE CITY YARDAT (714) 741-5395.ROW GROUND CONSTRUCTION NOTES:1.GROUND CONSTRUCTION TO REMOVE/CLEAN ALL DEBRIS, NAILS, STAPLES, OR NON-USEDVERTICALS OFF THE POLE.2.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUNICIPAL, COUNTY, STATE, FEDERAL,GO95 AND GO128 STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS.3.CALL USA 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING AT (800) 277-2600 OR 811.4.ALL LANDSCAPING TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER.5.ALL EQUIPMENT TO BE BONDED.6.METERING CABINET REQUIRES 36" CLEARANCE AT DOOR OPENING7.CAULK CABINET BASE AT PAD.

NORMAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES NOTES:1.LOCATION AND DEPTH OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES MUST BE PROVIDED BY THESURVEYOR AND SHOWN ON ANY PLANS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLICWORKS FOR APPROVAL.2.CHANGES MAY BE PERMITTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IN CASES OFCONFLICT FACILITIES.3.CONFLICTS BETWEEN UTILITY OF COMPANIES FACILITIES, EXISTING AND PROPOSED, MUSTBEMUTUALLY RESOLVED BY THE UTILITIES COMPANIES.4.FOR COMMERCIAL SIDEWALKS, THE FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE SIDEWALK1'-6" BEHIND FACE OF CURB.5.MAXIMUM 2" DIAMETER GAS MAINS MAY BE PLACED IN JOINT UTILITIES TRENCH SUBJECT TOAPPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER (IN TRACTS).

CALIFORNIA STATE CODE COMPLIANCE:ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THECURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNINGAUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOTCONFORMING TO THESE CODES:·2019 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (INCLUDING TITLES 24 & 25) 2019·2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES WHICH ADOPTS THE 2014 UBC, 2015 UMC, 2015 UPC ANDTHE 2014 NEC.·BUILDING OFFICIALS & CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA)·2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE·ANSI/EIA-222-F LIFE SAFETY CODE NFPA-101·2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE·2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE·CURRENT LOCAL BUILDING CODE·CURRENT CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCESACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION.HANDICAPPED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2019CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE.FCC NOTE:THIS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR RADIOFREQUENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TELECOMMUNICATION ACT OF 1996 AND SUBSEQUENTAMENDMENTS AND ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY STATE OR FEDERAL REGULATORYAGENCIES.GENERAL NOTES:1.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE CITY OFSANTA ANA ADOPTED EDITION AND SUPPLEMENTS TO THE "GREENBOOK STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION" AS MODIFIED BY THE CORRESPONDING ISSUE OF THE BROWN BOOK, THE LATEST EDITION OF THE BUREAU OF STREET LIGHTING SPECIAL SPECIFICATIONS", AND THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRESERVING THE CONDITION OF ALL EXISTINGEQUIPMENT TO BE REUSED, MODIFIED OR RETURNED TO THE BUREAU OF STREET LIGHTINGYARD.MULTIPLE CIRCUIT NOTES:WIRE CONNECTORS - WIRE CONNECTORS SHALL BEAR THE UNDERWRITERS LABORATORYSEAL OF APPROVAL. THE INSTALLATION PROCEDURE, INCLUDING CONNECTOR SIZE ANDCRIMPING TOOLS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. GENERALLY,BULKY OR ODD SHAPE CONNECTORS, NARROW CONNECTORS WHICH MAY DAMAGE THE WIRE, ORTWIST-ON AND SPLIT-BOLT TYPE CONNECTORS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. THE MECHANICALPERFORMANCE OF THE CONNECTOR SHALL BE SUCH THAT NO FREE PLAY CAN BE OBSERVEDAFTER THE CONNECTOR IS SUBJECTED TO A COMBINATION OF HAND-APPLIED TWISTS AND PULLS.A SOLID CROSS SECTION WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED WHEN THE CONNECTOR IS SUBJECT TO SAW CUTTING. ALL WIRE CONNECTORS SHALL HAVE A NOMINAL CROSS SECTION ARE EQUIVALENT TOTHE AREA OF THE LARGEST CONDUCTOR CONNECTED.

STORM GRAIN INLET PROTECTIONINLET

FLOW FLOW

EDGE OFPAVEMENT
SANDBAGS2-BAGS HEIGHTSPILLWAY1-BAG HEIGHT

TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITHSINGLE FLOW DIRECTION
NOTES:·INTENDED FOR SHORT-TERM USE.·USE TO INHIBIT NON-STORM WATER FLOW.·ALLOW FOR PROPER MAINTENANCE AND CLEANUP.·BAGS MUST BE REMOVED AFTER ADJACENT OPERATION IS COMPLETED.·NOT APPLICABLE IN AREAS WITH HIGH SILTS AND CLAYS WITHOUT FILTER FABRIC.

FLOW

EDGE OF PAVEMENTINLET
SANDBAGS2-BAGS HEIGHTSPILLWAY1-BAG HEIGHT

TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITHOPPOSING FLOW DIRECTION FLOW

RETURN EXISTING STREET LIGHT TO CITY MAINTENANCE YARD
NOTES:1. THE EXISTING STREETLIGHT SHALL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY’S MAINTENANCE DIVISION2. THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK SHALL ALWAYS BE OPEN AND ACCESSIBLE TO PEDESTRIANS3. FULL CONCRETE PANELS SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AND SHALL BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR. 0 CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

GENERAL REQUIREMENT U/GUTILITY AVOIDANCE
·GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW ALL FEDERAL & STATE STATUES ANDREGULATIONS; INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICES; BUILDING AND FIRE CODES; GENERAL CONTRACTORLICENSES; AND LOCAL LAWS, REGULATIONS & ORDINANCES IN THE EVENT A CONFLICT EXISTS BETWEENTHESE REGULATIONS AND THIS DOCUMENT, THE REGULATIONS SHALL CONTROL THE GENERALCONTRACTORS ACTIONS.·AT MINIMUM WHEN NOT IN CONFLICT WITH FEDERAL STATE AND LOCAL STATUES THE GENERALCONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE "COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE (CGA) BEST PRACTICES VERSION 17.0MANUAL OR LATEST - THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE FOR UNDERGROUND SAFETY & DAMAGE PREVENTION"RECOMMENDATIONS.·GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN, INCLUDING APPROPRIATECONTACT INFORMATION ONE CALL TICKET DETAILS AND IMMEDIATE CONTACTING DETAILS IN EVENT OFUNDERGROUND UTILITY DAMAGE IS AVAILABLE AT THE INSTALLATION SITE.·GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY ,MEASURES TO ENSURE ALL ELECTRICAL STRIKESYSTEMS ARE IN PLACE IF APPLICABLE AND HAS BRIEFED THE INSTALLATION CREW ON THE GENERALCONTRACTORS ELECTRICAL AND GAS LINE STRIKE PROCEDURES EACH DAY PRIOR TO WORKCOMMENCING.·GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL WHITE LINE THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ROUTE PRIOR TOCONTACTING THE UTILITY ONE-CALL SYSTEM.·GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENTIFY PRIOR TO WORK COMMENCEMENT A COMPETENT PERSON ONTHE WORK CREW WHO IS CAPABLE OF IDENTIFYING HAZARDS AND HAS THE AUTHORIZATION TO TAKEPROMPT CORRECTIVE MEASURES, INCLUDING STOP WORKS AUTHORITY TO ELIMINATE THEM AND SHALLBE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.·GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ONE-CALL FACILITY FOR EXISTING UTILITY LOCATES ASREQUIRED BY LAW AND PRESERVE ALL MARKS UNTIL THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED AND REFRESH THEONE CALL IF REQUIRED BY STATE OR JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS.·FOR PROJECTS WITH HIGH PRIORITY UTILITIES OR ANY UNUSUAL OR COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR A PRE-EXCAVATION MEETING WITH THE AFFECTEDUTILITIES AND OR THEIR DESIGNATED LOCATING COMPANY TO DISCUSS THE PROJECT. HIGH PRIORITYUTILITIES SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO HIGH PRESSURE GAS LINES, HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRICLINE MAJOR PIPELINES MAJOR WATER LINES AND HIGH CAPACITY FIBER OPTIC LINES.·THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ANY UTILITIES IDENTIFIED FOR LOCATING WHICH ARE NOTMARKED ON THE GROUND HAVE PROVIDED POSITIVE CONFIRMATION NO CONFLICT EXISTS. IF THERE ISA LACK OF POSITIVE CONFIRMATION, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST RE-CALL THE ONE-CALL CENTEROR RELEVANT UTILITY DIRECTLY FOR CONFIRMATION.·IN THE EVENT A UTILITY CANNOT BE LOCATED, WHERE POSITIVE CONFIRMATION IS NOT RECEIVED, ORWHERE THERE IS A LIKELIHOOD OF UNDOCUMENTED UTILITIES, SUCH AS PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE,THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE THE STEP OF SYSTEMATICALLY UTILIZING A GROUNDPENETRATING RADAR (GPR) SYSTEM OR SIMILAR ADVANCED LOCATING TECHNOLOGY WITHIN THETOLERANCE ZONE TO IDENTIFY AND DOCUMENT ANY UTILITIES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE. ANYUTILITY LOCATED USING GPR SHALL BE PROPERLY LOCATED AND EXPOSED AS OUTLINED WITHIN THISSTANDARD PRIOR TO DIGGING.·THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE AREA PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR ANYUNDERGROUND UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN MISSED BY SURVEYING THECONSTRUCTION AREA AND SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT FOR CLEANOUTS, SUNKEN AREAS, RISERS,OUTBUILDING, LIGHT POLES, METERS, UTILITY BOXES, PEDESTALS, MANHOLE COVERS, MARKERS. ETC.PARTICULAR ATTENTION SHOULD BE MADE TO IDENTIFY SERVICE FEEDS FROM BUILDINGS AND HOMESARE MARKED.·THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ANY UTILITY WHERE LOCATES ARE IN QUESTION AND/ORUNVERIFIED. NO ASSUMPTIONS SHOULD BE MADE ON LOCATION OR DEPTH OF EXISTING UTILITIES.·THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, AT MINIMUM, SHALL TAKE AND STORE A PHOTO SERIES TO BE SUBMITTEDWITH THE CLOSE OUT PACKAGE OF ALL EXCAVATION AREAS ONCE LOCATES ARE COMPLETE AND PRIORTO EXCAVATION.·GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS REGARDINGWORKER SAFETY AND TRAINING WHEN WORKING AROUND UNDERGROUND FACILITIES.·GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VISUALLY EXPOSE (POT-HOLE) ALL EXISTING UTILITIES CROSSING THETOLERANCE ZONE AND SHALL POSITIVELY IDENTIFY THEIR LOCATION AND DEPTH USING APPROPRIATETECHNIQUES WITHIN THE TOLERANCE ZONE.·GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VISUALLY EXPOSE (POT-HOLE) ALL EXISTING UTILITIES RUNNINGPARALLEL WITH THE PROPOSED PATH AT THE APPROPRIATE INTERVALS WITHIN THE TOLERANCE ZONEAND APPROPRIATE BUFFER ZONE. UNLESS MORE STRINGENT REGULATIONS EXIST, THE GENERALCONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE (POT-HOLE) AT MINIMUM ANY PARALLEL UTILITY WITHIN 3' OF THETOLERANCE ZONE EVERY 25' AND ANY PARALLEL UTILITY BETWEEN 3' TO 5' OF THE TOLERANCE ZONEEVERY 100'.·THE TOLERANCE ZONE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 30' BEYOND EACH SIDE OF THE INSTALLED PIPE, ORGREATER IF CODE REQUIRES.·GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL USE A DRILL HEAD TRACKING DEVICE WHEN BORING AND TRACK THEDRILL HEAD AT A MINIMUM OF EVERY 5' OR AS REQUIRED BY CODE A LOG SHALL BE CREATEDRECORDING THE LOCATION AND DEPTH AND SUBMITTED WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AS-BUILTPACKAGE.·GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE ENFORCED WITH ALLSUB-CONTRACTORS RETAINED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.·

GENERAL REQUIREMENT - UNDERGROUND UTILITY AVOIDANCE

S
S

SSSSSSSSSSSSS
S
S
SSS
UGF/P
UGF/P
UGF/P

UGF/PUGF/PUGF/P
UGF/P
UGF/P
UGF/P
UGF/P
CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

EQUIPMENT AREA

EXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDING
EXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDINGWASHINGTON PL. ℄
ALBRIGHT AVE.
℄
SAWTELLE BLVD.℄
ALLEY
ALLEY
ROW
CURB
ROW
ROWROW
CURB

CURBCURB
ROW
CURB

ROWCURB

CURBCURB
CURB
CURB

CURBROW ROW
CURB
ROW
ROW
ROWROW
92'-0"
49'-0"
43'-0"
70'-0"37'-0"33'-0"
35'-8"
WASHINGTON PL.
℄

ROWCURB
CURB

GRASS AREASIDEWALK
ROW

EXISTINGBUILDING

EXISTINGBUILDING
N
SITE PLAN32'24'16'0"32' 8' 24"x36" SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"11"x17" SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1

LIGHT POLE

CROWN CASTLE OWNED POLEPOLE - TEMPORARYCONCRETE POLESTEEL POLE

TRANSFORMER POLEJOINT POLEPOWER POLE

JOINT TRANSFORMER POLE

QUEENS POST ANCHORSPAN NOT STRANDEDGROUND LOCATIONBOND LOCATIONSIDEWALK ANCHOR ANCHOR

ROCK ANCHORBUILDING ANCHOR

OVERHEAD GUYPOLE TO POLE GUYRISER TELEPHONE POLE

CATV POLEEXISTING STRAND
SYM.DESCRIPTIONSYM.DESCRIPTIONSYM.DESCRIPTIONSYM.DESCRIPTIONSYM.DESCRIPTION

INNERDUCT
R+height'

TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE
V
CALLOUT / POLE NUMBERABOVE GROUND PEDESTAL17x30 VAULT
MANHOLE - LEASED24x36 VAULT
SYM.

BORE

MICROTRENCH

CROWN OWNED UG

CROWN LEASED UG

CROWN OWNED UGCROWN OWNED UGEMTSTRUCTURE ATTACHED PIPE
DESCRIPTIONSYM.OVERHEAD FIBER OPTIC LINE

FIBER JUMPER/TAIL
DESCRIPTIONSYM.

FIBER NODE/REMOTE EQUIPMENT

DESCRIPTION

UG FIBER OPTIC LINE

FIBER SLACKFIBER COUNTFIBER OPTIC SPLICE

ANTENNAE
HUBSYM.DESCRIPTION

TOWER - MONOPOLE

TOWER - LATTICE
HANDHOLE - LEASEDBRIDGE or
FCAN / SPLICE ENCLOSURESYM.DESCRIPTIONBUILDING DESCRIPTIONSYM.DESCRIPTIONSYM.DESCRIPTIONSYM.DESCRIPTION N/AN/TUGUG 100'
4'0"4' 24"x36" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"11"x17" SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"2'2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN

SITE PLAN & ENLARGEDSITE PLAN
A-1
NODE #: CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - AADDRESS:11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT:34.007113LONG:-118.416993AZIMUTH:0°, 120°, 240°YEAR BUILT: NEW 7'-2"4'-0"
5'-0"

INSTALL NEW WUT STEELSTREET LIGHT POLE
EXISTING CONCRETE STREETLIGHT POLE # NO TAG ANDFOUNDATION TO BE REMOVED

EXISTING STREETLIGHT PULLBOX
EXISTING CATCH BASINEXISTINGMANHOLE, TYP.

EXISTING 54"STORM DRAIN
1'-0"4'-0"
3'-0"
PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'24X36 PULLBOX WITH WTR INSIDE
PROPOSED 2'-6" Ø X 7'-0" DEEP FOUNDATION(SEE POLE/ FOUNDATION PLANS) PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'EQUIPMENT RADOME SHROUDASSEMBLY WITH (3) 5G ANTENNASSHROUD MOUNTED ON TOP OF POLE.

PROPOSED UNDERGROUND FIBER ANDPOWER POINT OF CONNECTION ROUTEUNDER SEPARATE APPLICATION EXISTING UTILITY POLE#1143268EPROPOSED POWER (P.O.C.)

EXISTING ALLEY
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND FIBER ANDPOWER POINT OF CONNECTION ROUTEAPPROX LENGTH 300' (UNDER SEPARATEAPPLICATION) CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

STATEOFCALIFORNIA
CHRISS.LEE
REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER Industries25422 TRABUCO ROADSUITE 105-627LAKE FOREST CA 92630 OWNER/DEVELOPER:
200 SPECTRUM CENTER DRIVE, 19TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92618
B90% CDs FOR REVIEWJTC90% CDs FOR REVIEWJT08/09/2022
D90% CDs FOR REVIEWJT08/17/2022
E90% CDs FOR REVIEWJT08/31/2022
0PLAN CHECK COMMNETSMG09/09/202201/17/2023
U22-0413/
NODE #: CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - AADDRESS:11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT:34.007113LONG:-118.416993AZIMUTH:0°, 120°, 240°YEAR BUILT: NEW PROPOSED ELEVATION LOOKING NORTHEXISTING ELEVATION LOOKING NORTH2'0"2' 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1'22'0"2' 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1'1 FINISHED GRADE0'-0"
TOP OF EXISTING LIGHT LUMINAIRE35'-0" A.G.L.

EXISTING CONCRETE STREETLIGHT POLE TO BE REMOVED

EXISTINGGRASS AREAEXISTING STREETLIGHT PULLBOX
BOTTOM OF EXISTING SIGN7'-4" A.G.L.

EXISTING SIGNSTO BE RELOCATED
EXISTING CONCRETE STREETLIGHT POLE # NO TAG ANDFOUNDATION TO BE REMOVED

ELEVATIONS
A-2
FINISHED GRADE0'-0"
BOTTOM OF RELOCATED SIGN7'-4" A.G.L.

EXISTINGGRASS AREA
PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'"CAUTION RADIOFREQUENCY SIGNAGE" PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'"NOTICE RADIO FREQUENCYSIGNAGE"

INSTALL NEW WUT STEELSTREET LIGHT POLE

PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'STAINLESS STEEL BANDS,TYPICAL

EXISTINGRELOCATED SIGN

PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE' EQUIPMENTRADOME SHROUD ASSEMBLY

EXISTING RELOCATEDLUMINAIRE
PROPOSED 2'-0" Ø X 7'-0"DEEP FOUNDATION (SEEPOLE/ FOUNDATION PLANS) PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'1.5" Ø CONDUIT
PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'1.5" Ø CONDUIT FOR POWER
TOP OF EXISTING POLE26'-0" A.G.L.

EXISTING STREETLIGHT PULLBOX
EXISTING CONCRETE STREETLIGHT POLE # NO TAG ANDFOUNDATION TO BE REMOVED TOP OF PROPOSED RF SIGNAGE10'-0" A.G.L.
7'-0"
2'-0"
1'-0"2'-0"
2'-10"5'-0"
4'-4"
CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED LUMINAIRE ARM33'-0" A.G.L.

TOP OF NEW RF SIGNAGE25'-8" A.G.L.

PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'5/8" Ø X 8" GROUND ROD
PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE' (3) 5GANTENNAS SHROUD MOUNTED ONTOP OF POLE.

PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'FIBER 24X36 PULLBOX WITHWTR INSIDE

EXISTING LUMINAIRETO BE RELOCATED
TOP OF PROPOSED RADIO SHROUD ASSEMBLY37'-4" A.G.L.RAD OF PROPOSED ANTENNAS36'-5" A.G.L.TOP OF PROPOSED STEEL LIGHT POLE35'-0" A.G.L.

Keep Back___FT Fromthis antenna, FCC RF PublicExposure Limits May BeExceeded Within This Distance.Call 888-632-0931 forInstructions.Qualified Workers:FCC Occupational Limits May BeExceeded Within This Distance SITE ID # 5 CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A

CAUTION
POLE WORKERSThere is an antenna operationhigh on this pole. please followguidance on signs near the antennaor call the number belowSITE ID #888-632-0931CROWNCASTLE CA002_CLC_CULVER_010- A
CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

STATEOFCALIFORNIA
CHRISS.LEE
REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER Industries25422 TRABUCO ROADSUITE 105-627LAKE FOREST CA 92630 OWNER/DEVELOPER:
200 SPECTRUM CENTER DRIVE, 19TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92618
B90% CDs FOR REVIEWJTC90% CDs FOR REVIEWJT08/09/2022
D90% CDs FOR REVIEWJT08/17/2022
E90% CDs FOR REVIEWJT08/31/2022
0PLAN CHECK COMMNETSMG09/09/202201/17/2023
U22-0413/
NODE #: CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - AADDRESS:11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT:34.007113LONG:-118.416993AZIMUTH:0°, 120°, 240°YEAR BUILT: NEW PROPOSED ELEVATION LOOKING WESTEXISTING ELEVATION LOOKING WEST2'0"2' 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1'22'0"2' 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1'1 FINISHED GRADE0'-0"
TOP OF EXISTING LIGHT LUMINAIRE35'-0" A.G.L.

EXISTING CONCRETE STREETLIGHT POLE TO BE REMOVED

EXISTINGGRASS AREAEXISTINGSIDEWALK
BOTTOM OF EXISTING SIGN7'-4" A.G.L.EXISTING SIGNSTO BE RELOCATED EXISTING CONCRETE STREETLIGHT POLE # NO TAG ANDFOUNDATION TO BE REMOVED

ELEVATIONS
A-3
TOP OF EXISTING POLE26'-0" A.G.L.

EXISTING STREETLIGHT PULLBOX
ROW
8'-10"4'-4"2'-7"3" 2'-7"
BOTTOM OF RELOCATED SIGN7'-4" A.G.L.

TOP OF PROPOSED RF SIGNAGE10'-0" A.G.L.

FINISHED GRADE0'-0"

EXISTINGSIDEWALK

EXISTING STREETLIGHT PULLBOX
ROW

EXISTINGCURBEXISTINGGRASS AREAEXISTINGCURB
PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'"CAUTION RADIOFREQUENCY SIGNAGE" PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'"NOTICE RADIO FREQUENCYSIGNAGE"

INSTALL NEW WUT STEELSTREET LIGHT POLE

PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'STAINLESS STEEL BANDS,TYPICAL

EXISTINGRELOCATED SIGN

PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE' EQUIPMENTRADOME SHROUD ASSEMBLY PROPOSED 2'-0" Ø X 7'-0"DEEP FOUNDATION (SEEPOLE/ FOUNDATION PLANS) PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'1.5" Ø CONDUIT
PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'1.5" Ø CONDUIT FOR POWER
7'-0"
1'-0"
2'-7"
8'-10"4'-4"
TOP OF NEW RF SIGNAGE25'-8" A.G.L.

PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'5/8" Ø X 8" GROUND ROD
PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE' (3) 5GANTENNAS SHROUD MOUNTED ONTOP OF POLE.

PROPOSED 'CROWN CASTLE'FIBER 24X36 PULLBOX WITHWTR INSIDE (BEHIND)

EXISTING LUMINAIRETO BE RELOCATED
TOP OF PROPOSED RADIO SHROUD ASSEMBLY37'-4" A.G.L.RAD OF PROPOSED ANTENNAS36'-5" A.G.L.TOP OF PROPOSED STEEL LIGHT POLE35'-0" A.G.L.CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED LUMINAIRE ARM33'-0" A.G.L.EXISTING RELOCATEDLUMINAIRE 2'-0"
2'-0"
CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

PHOTOSIMULATIONS
1 2PROPOSED EXISTING
CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

14.4"

14.4" 5.9"

4.63" 5"

9.05"

SPECIFICATIONSDIMENSIONS (HXWXD)WEIGHTMANUFACTURERMODEL (14.4" x 7.9" x 5.9")31 LBSERICSSONSTREETMACRO 6705(OR APPROVED EQUAL)7.9"15"

5.9"TOP7.9"TOP4.72"7.87"TOP

SPECIFICATIONSDIMENSIONS (HXWXD)WEIGHTMANUFACTURERMODEL (5" x 15" x 4.63")N/AR&M USA INC.FTH-LCU-PGT-F12-1524 ORFTH-LCU-PGT-F12-3048(OR APPROVED EQUAL)

SPECIFICATIONSDIMENSIONS (HXWXD)WEIGHTMANUFACTURERMODEL (9.05" x 7.87" x 4.72")7.7 LBSERICSSONFRONTHAUL 6387(OR APPROVED EQUAL)

SIDEFRONT SIDEFRONTSIDEFRONT

WEIGHTMODEL

SPECIFICATIONS
MANUFACTURERDIMENSIONS (HXWXD)(14.0" x 12.0" x 6.0")N/AJ1412HPLSTAHLIN PLAN
12"

FRONTSIDE
14"
6 "

SPECIFICATIONSDIMENSIONS (HXWXD)WEIGHTMANUFACTURERMODEL (12.39" x 8.59" x 5.65")8.0 LBSRAYCAPRSCAC-9556-PH-240

8.59"

PLANFRONT

5.65"

12.39"
5 ANTENNA SHROUD DETAIL6 TYPICAL ANTENNA SHROUD ASSEMBLY Ø18"PROPOSED LED LUMINAIREPROPOSED 8'-0" MAST ARMANTENNA SHROUDRF CAUTION SIGNAGE(3) 5G INTEGRATED ANTENNAS 8'-0"

PROPOSED RF NOTICE SIGN

PROPOSED STEEL STREET LIGHT POLE

SPECIFICATIONSDIMENSIONS (HXD)WEIGHT (EMPTY)MANUFACTURERMODEL

28.3" x 18" ØAPPROX. 61 LBSCHARLESSHRD5-2818
FRONT
BOTTOM
PLAN
10" 14.3"4"

28.3"
18" Ø
(12X) Ø .516" SLOTSON Ø 8.5625" B.C.D
WEIGHT (WITH EQUIPMENT)APPROX. 134 LBS
CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

DETAILS
3 RF CAUTION SIGN4 RF NOTICE SIGN
Keep Back___FT Fromthis antenna, FCC RF PublicExposure Limits May BeExceeded Within This Distance.Call 888-632-0931 forInstructions.Qualified Workers:FCC Occupational Limits May BeExceeded Within This Distance SITE ID # 5 POLE WORKERSThere is an antenna operationhigh on this pole. please followguidance on signs near the antennaor call the number belowSITE ID #888-632-0931CROWNCASTLE CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A

CAUTION
1 WTR FUSE BOX2 CONNECTION HANDHOLE
12"
8"MAX.
18"
SIDE36"18"
FRONT
30" MIN.TO GRADE
4"
24"
5 NOT USED6 NOT USED7 NOT USED8 3/4" STAINLESS STEEL BAND MATERIAL

GIANT BAND

GIANT BUCKLE EAR-LOCK STYLE
MANUFACTURER: BAND-IT-IDEX, INCORPORATEDMODEL: G43099MATERIAL: 201 STAINLESS STEELWIDTH: 3/4 INTHICKNESS: .044 INWEIGHT: 11.6 LBSPACKAGE QUANTITY: 100' ROLLAVERAGE BREAKING STRENGTH: 3300 USE WITH BUCKLE TYPE GIANT EAR-LOKT: G44099WEBSITE: BAND-IT-IDEX.COM CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
Industries25422 TRABUCO ROADSUITE 105-627LAKE FOREST CA 92630 OWNER/DEVELOPER:
200 SPECTRUM CENTER DRIVE, 19TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92618
B90% CDs FOR REVIEWJTC90% CDs FOR REVIEWJT08/09/2022
D90% CDs FOR REVIEWJT08/17/2022
E90% CDs FOR REVIEWJT08/31/2022
0PLAN CHECK COMMNETSMG09/09/202201/17/2023
U22-0413/
S-1

POLE SPECIFICATION
1 POLE SPECIFICATIONS
CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

FOUNDATION DETAILS
1 FOUNDATION DETAILS
CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

POLE SPECIFICATION
1 ONE-LINE DIAGRAM
2 GROUNDING SCHEMATIC3 RF PLUMBING DIAGRAM
4 LOAD SCHEDULE
PANEL CIRCUIT AND LOAD SCHEDULELOADTORADIOS DESCRIPTIONQTYUNITV.A.TRIPPOLESWIRESIZEK.A.I.CWIRETYPE 123456789101112 111111111111
111111111111 TOTAL NON-CONTINUOUSTOTAL KVATOTAL AMPSVOLTAGE: 120/240 VMAIN LUG:PHASE: 1WIRES: 3 ERICSSON SM6705ERICSSON SM670550050010A10A1212
1,50012.5
10A10A
ERICSSON SM670550010A1210A
GGGG
GGGGG

G G GGGG
G

GGGGGGGGGG
GGGGGG
GGGGGG
GGGG
G
GGGGGG
GGGG
PROPOSED 5G ANTENNA(3 TOTAL)NOTE:ALL GROUND CONDUCTORS TO BE #10TJJM/THWN GREEN STRANDED COPPERUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIREDBY EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER.MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS ARE TO BEIRREVERSIBLE CRIMP OR EQUIVALENT.

EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTIONSMECHANICAL TYPE CONNECTIONSGROUNDING BAR PROPOSED #10 THHN/THWNGREEN STRANDED GROUND FROMEQUIPMENT TO GROUND BUSPROPOSED #10 THHN/THWNGREEN COPPER TINNEDCOATED MAIN GROUNDCONDUCTOR/ RISER

LOAD CENTER
PROPOSED #10 THHN/THWNGREEN COPPER TINNEDCOATED MAIN GROUNDCONDUCTOR/ RISER PROPOSED 5/8" x 8'-0" COPPER-CLAD STEEL GROUND RD.GROUND ROD SHOULD BE MIN. 1' BELOW GRADE AND24'-36" FROM THE POLE IF A SINGLE GROUND ROD DOESNOT HAVE A RESISTANCE TO GROUND OF 25 OHMS ORLESS, IT SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTED BY AN ADDITIONALROD. SEPARATION BETWEEN GROUND RODS SHOULD BEAT A MIN. DISTANCE OF 6'.

LOAD CENTER

EXISTING POWER SOURCE
(3) #8 WIRES AWG FOR SCE POWERINTO WTR BOX 1 WHITE (NEUTRAL)(4) BLACK (120VAC / HOT)WTR BOX EARTH GROUND#6 WIRE AWG TOGROUND ROD

EQUIPMENT BLOCKNEUTRAL BLOCK
(2) 6 AMP FUSESPART #KLK6(2) 15 AMP SQUARE"D" BREAKER

NEUTRAL BLOCK
(3) # 6 WIRES AWG FOR POWER TORADIO UNIT(S)1- BLACK1-WHITE1- RED (3) 14 AWG - 3 CONDUCTOR -300V -STRANDED CONDUCTOR -SJOOW -PORTABLE CORD - PROPOSED 5G ANTENNA(3 TOTAL)
NOTE:UTILITY DESIGN AND RUNS AREPRELIMINARY. PENDING FINALDESIGN FROM UTILITY PROVIDERS.

CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

GROUNDING DETAILS
COAX GROUNDING KITSTYPICAL (6)MTC 976715 - 15'MTC 976720 - 20' #4 OR #6 AWG FROM ANTENNACABLE GROUND KIT TYPE SSTYPE TATYPE VBTYPE PHTYPE GR 3" FLEXIBLE CONDUITTYPE XATYPE GTTYPE GL LUGTYPE NCTYPE PCGROUND BAR ONWALL, FLOOR ORON ANTENNA 3" SCHED. 40 PVCTWO HOLE LONG BARRELCOMPRESSION LUGSTYPE PGTYPE LJTYPE HATYPE VSTYPE NX1*TWO HOLE LUG, OR EXOTHERMIC WELDTO BE USED WITH #2 AWG BCW TO WATERTANK WATER MAIN OR GROUND RINGTYPE RR 12" TO 24"TO LOW NOISEAMPLIFIER UNITS (LNA)(WHEN REQUIRED) &RECEIVE ANTENNA RX1/RX2 ANTENNA CABLE
CABLE GROUND KITWEATHERPROOFINGKIT (SEE NOTE 3)#4 OR #6 AWG STRANDED COPPERGROUND WIRE (GROUNDED TOGROUND BAR) (SEE NOTE 1 AND 2)NOTES:1. DO NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND AND ALWAYS DIRECTGROUND WIRE DOWN TO GROUND BAR2. GROUNDING KIT SHALL BE ANDREW SUREGROUND TYPE KIT WITHTWO-HOLE LUG3. WEATHER PROOFING SHALL BE ANDREW TWO-PART TAPE SUPPLIEDWITH KIT. COLD SHRINK SHALL NOT BE USED COAX JUMPER REQUIREDPER MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATION ORFOR EASE OFCONNECTION, TYPCONNECTORWEATHERPROOFINGKIT, TYPFROM LNA (WHENREQUIRED)2 AWG TINNED, SOLIDCOPPER CONDUCTOREXOTHERMIC WELD TOGROUNDING BUS 4 / 6 AWG STRANDED COPPERCONDUCTOR WITH GREEN, 600V,THWN-2 INSULATIONGROUNDING BAR, ANDREW PART# UGBKIT-0424-T (TINNED). ALOCKBOX IS REQUIRED ATGRADE TASSCO PART # 351546.ANTENNA HEIGHT WILLDETERMINE NUMBER OFGROUNDING BARS AND THEIRLOCATION DIRECTION OF BOND TO TURN TOSHORTEST DISTANCE TO MGB#6 AWG GREEN INSULATEDSTRANDED COPPER WIRE(UNIT BOND)

TO TRANSMITANTENNA

GROUND CONDUCTOR SHALL BEELIMINATED WHEN GROUND BAR ISELECTRICALLY BONDED TO METAL RX1/RX2T&B CO. "C-TAP", CAT. #54730, CRIMPTYPE PARALLED TAP OR EQUIVALENT

STANDARD GROUNDING KIT, TYPANTENNA CABLE TO BTS, TYP
4316"572 2"1 SEE DETAIL 1
LEGEND:1. COPPER GROUND BAR, 1/4"X 4"X 20", NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. B-6142 OR EQUAL.HOLE CENTERS TO MATCH NEMA DOUBLE LUG CONFIGURATION. (ACTUAL GROUND BAR SIZEWILL VARY BASED ON NUMBER OF GROUND CONNECTIONS)2. INSULATORS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CAT. NO. 3061-4 OR EQUAL3. 5/8" LOCKWASHERS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. 3015-8 OR EQUAL WALL MOUNTINGBRACKET, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT NO. A-6056 OR EQUAL4. 5/8-11 X 1" HHCS BOLTS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT NO. 3012-1 OR EQUAL5. INSULATORS SHALL BE ELIMINATED WHEN BONDING DIRECTLY TO STRUCTURE. CONNECTIONTO STRUCTURE SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS 1"34" 2 1/2"Ø MAX.
4 GROUNDING WIRE CONNECTION5 GROUNDING BAR CONNECTION6 CABLE GROUND KIT 7 GROUND ROD8 NOT USED9 GROUND BAR
NOTE:GROUND ROD INSTALLATION FOR UTILITY POLESUTILITY POLE GROUND SHALL COMPLY WITH PUBLIC UTILITIESCOMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GENERAL ORDER NO. 95(SECTION 54.9, 92.4) CU GROUND CLAMP FCI NO.GBL3-T8. TYCO NO. 83749-1, OREQUAL

FINISHGRADE
#6 (5/8" X 8') COPPER CLADGROUND ELECTRODE
1 WIRE TO GROUND BAR CONNECTION2 TYPICAL CADWELD TYPES3 COAX GROUND KIT CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS&NOTES
W4-2 (LT)
RIGHTLANECLOSEDAHEADC20 (RT)

ROADWORKAHEAD
W20-1
RIGHT LANEMUSTTURN RIGHTR3-7 BEPREPAREDTO STOPW3-4(OPTIONAL FORLOW SPEED)

ONE LANEROADAHEAD
W20-4
ENDROAD WORKG20-2(OPTIONAL)

LANECLOSED
C30
C9A
ROADWORKAHEADW20-1
(OPTIONAL)

NARROWLANE
C12(OPTIONAL)
BIKELANECLOSEDSC11(MOD)
SHARETHEROADW16-1
BIKELANECLOSEDAHEADC20(BIKE)
R9-3(OPTIONAL)

RAIL ROADCROSSINGDO NOTSTOPONTRACKS
SIDEWALK CLOSEDCROSS HERER9-11A(LT)
W11-1
W12-1W1-3 (LT)(OPTIONAL)W1-6W6-4
THE UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN ARE FOR THECONTRACTORS CONVENIENCE ONLY. THERE MAY BEOTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.THE ENGINEER/SURVEYOR ASSUMES NORESPONSIBILITY FOR THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ANDIT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITYTO VERIFY ALL THE UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMITS OFTHE WORK. ALL DAMAGE MADE TO THE EXISTINGUTILITIES BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE THE SOLERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.

IF YOU DIG IN ANY STATE DIAL 811FOR THE LOCAL "ONE CALL CENTER"- IT'S THE LAW STOPAHEADW3-1STOPAHEADW3-1aW5-2aW5-3ONE LANEBRIDGEW5-4

BIKEWAYNARROWS
W6-1W6-2W6-3W7-1W7-1aHILL 8W7-1b
GEARW7-2USE 2ND
GEARUSE LOWW7-2a
TRUCKSUSE LOWERGEARW7-2bGRADE 9W7-3
NEXTW7-3a 7 MILES
9 GRADE 7 MILESW7-3b
RUNAWAYTRUCK RAMP1 MILEW7-4

RUNAWAYTRUCK RAMP
W7-4a
W7-5HILLW8-1BUMPDIPW8-2PAVEMENTENDSW8-3W8-3a
W8-4
SOFTSHOULDERW8-5
TRUCKCROSSINGW8-6
LOOSEGRAVELW8-7ROUGHROADW8-8
LOWSHOULDERW8-9
W8-9aW8-10

SLIPPERYWHEN WET
LEFTLANEENDSW9-1L
RIGHTLANEENDSW9-1RMERGELANE ENDS
W9-2LLEFTW9-2R
W10-1RR
GKO
W10-2LW10-2RW10-3LW10-3R
W10-4L
W10-4RW11A-2
W11A-4W11A-7W11A-9W11-1W11-2
W11-3W11-4W11-5W11-6
W11-7W11-8
W11-9W11-10W12-1W12-2
M.P.H.35W13-1M.P.H.

EXIT25W13-2
M.P.H.

RAMP30W13-3
DEADENDW14-1W14-1PDEAD ENDNOOUTLETW14-2NO OUTLETW14-2PNOPASSINGZONEW14-3 W14-4
LIMITEDSIGHTDISTANCEW15-1
CONSTRUCTIONROAD500 FT
CONSTRUCTIONROAD1000 FTCONSTRUCTIONROAD1500 FTCONSTRUCTIONROADMILE12CONSTRUCTIONROAD1 MILECONSTRUCTIONROAD DETOURAHEADDETOUR500 FTDETOUR1000 FT
DETOUR1500 FTDETOURMILE12

ROADCLOSEDONELANEROADCLOSEDCENTER LANELEFT LANECLOSEDCLOSEDRIGHT LANEFLAGGER 500FEET
WORKERSROADWORKSHOULDERWORKSURVEYCREWBLASTINGZONE1000 FTTURN OFF2-WAYRADIOENDBLASTINGZONE 12'-6"
W20-7a
W20-1a
W20-1bW20-1cW20-1dW20-1eW20-1f
W20-2aW20-2bW20-2c
W20-2dW20-2e
W20-3W20-4W20-5CW20-5LW20-5RW20-7
W20-7x
W21-1W21-1aW21-4W21-5W21-6W22-1W22-2W22-3
AHEAD

MERGERIGHTLANE ENDS
MUTCD 2019 Sign ChartsSheet 13 of 14 - Temporary Traffic Control SignsThis chart contains commonly used federal 2019 MUTCD sign, and is not meant to be used as a comprehensive sign chart or astand-alone sign design tool. Otherwise, federal 2019 MUTCD sign designations are shown (formerly known as sign codes).

BUSSOLID LINECROSSDO NOT

PARKING BYDISABLEDPERMITONLY
0000CONSTRUCTIONROADNEXT X MILESCONSTRUCTIONENDROAD WORKENDFOLLOW MEPILOT CAR TWO LANESCLOSEDAHEADLEFTINTERSTATE75M1-1

BUSINESSLOOP
M1-2
SPUR
M1-3441M1-4

JCTNORTHEAST

SOUTHWEST
DETOUR
DETOUR

ALTTOEND

TEMPORARY

DETOURENDDETOURDETOUR
DETOUR

STAYIN YOURLANESTOP
YIELD4-WAY

ALL WAY

RIGHTTWO LANESCLOSEDAHEAD
SPEEDLIMIT50TRUCKS
R2-240NIGHT45R2-3
MINIMUMSPEED40R2-4
SPEEDLIMITMINIMUM3050R2-4AR2-5AR2-5B
R2-5C
REDUCEDSPEEDAHEADREDUCEDSPEED30

SPEEDZONEAHEAD
NOTURNSR3-3R3-5LONLYR3-5RR3-6L
R3-6R
LEFT LANEMUSTTURN LEFTR3-7LMUSTRIGHT LANETURN RIGHTR3-7R ONLYR3-8LONLYR3-8R
ONLYR3-9a

CENTERLANE
ONLYR3-9b

RESTRICTEDLANE
AHEADR3-10

LANEBUSES ANDONLY
CENTER
CAR POOLS 6AM-9AMMON-FRI
R3-11

RESTRICTEDLANE
ENDSR3-12
RESTRICTEDLANEAHEADR3-13BUSES AND4 RIDERRIGHT TURNS ONLYMON-FRI 6AM-9AM R3-14
RESTRICTEDLANEENDSR3-15AHEADLANE
R3-16
RIGHTLANEONLYR3-17DONOTPASSR4-1PASSWITHCARER4-2
SLOWERTRAFFICKEEPRIGHTR4-3R4-4

BEGINRIGHT TURN LANEYIELD TO BIKES
TRUCKSUSERIGHTLANER4-5
TRUCKLANEFEETR4-6500R4-7

KEEPLEFTKEEPRIGHT
KEEPLEFTKEEPRIGHTR4-8
DO NOTENTERR5-1WRONGWAYR5-1aR5-2
NOMOTORVEHICLESR5-3
COMMERCIALVEHICLESEXCLUDEDR5-4
VEHICLESWITH LUGSPROHIBITEDR5-5R5-6
PEDESTRIANSBICYCLESMOTOR-DRIVENCYCLESPROHIBITEDR5-10a
PEDESTRIANSAND BICYCLESPROHIBITEDR5-10bPEDESTRIANSPROHIBITEDR5-10c ONE WAYR6-1LONE WAYR6-1R
ONEWAYR6-2LONEWAYR6-2R

DIVIDEDHIGHWAY
R6-3DIVIDEDHIGHWAY
R6-3a

NOPARKINGANYTIME
R7-1NOPARKING 8:30 AM
R7-2
TO 5:30 PM
8:30 AM 5:30 PM
R7-2aNOPARKINGEXCEPTSUNDAYS ANDHOLIDAYS
R7-3

NOANYTIMESTANDING
R7-4HOURPARKINGONE9AM-7PM
R7-5

NOPARKINGLOADINGZONE
R7-6NOPARKINGBUSSTOP
R7-7

RESERVEDPARKING
R7-8NOPARKINGBIKELANER7-9
BIKELANER7-9aR7-107aR7-107
NOPARKINGBUSSTOP2HRPARKING 8:30 AMTO 5:30 PM
R7-108
NOPARKINGANYTIMEONEHOURPARKING9AM-7PMR7-200R7-201TOW AWAYZONE R7-201aR7-202THIS SIDEOF SIGN
NOPARKINGONPAVEMENTR8-1
NOPARKINGEXCEPT ONSHOULDERR8-2NOPARKINGR8-3R8-3aR8-3aP
EXCEPTSUNDAYS ANDHOLIDAYSEMERGENCYPARKINGONLYR8-4NOONPAVEMENTSTOPPINGR8-5STOPPINGNOEXCEPT ONSHOULDERR8-6 EMERGENCYONLYSTOPPINGR8-7
DO NOTSTOPONTRACKSR8-8
TRACKSOUT OFSERVICER8-9
WALKON LEFTFACINGTRAFFICR9-1

CROSSONLYATCROSSWALKS
R9-2

NOPEDESTRIANCROSSING
R9-3
R9-3aUSECROSSWALKR9-3bLUSECROSSWALKR9-3bRNOHITCHHIKINGR9-4 R9-4a
USEPEDSIGNALR9-5
YIELDTOPEDSR9-6

KEEPLEFTRIGHT
R9-7

CROSSGREENLIGHTONLY

ONCROSSONLY

ONWALKSIGNALCROSSONLYONSIGNAL

TO CROSSSTREETPUSH BUTTONWAIT FORGREEN LIGHT

PUSHFORBUTTONWALKSIGNAL

TO CROSSSTREETPUSH BUTTONWAIT FORWALK SIGNAL

PUSHBUTTONFOR

LEFT ONGREENARROWONLY

STOPREDHEREON
R10-6aL

STOPREDHEREON
R10-6aR

STOPREDHERE ON
R10-6L

STOPREDHERE ON
R10-6R
DO NOTBLOCKINTERSECTIONR10-7
USELANEWITHGREENARROWR10-8LEFTTURNSIGNALRIGHTTURNSIGNALNOTURNONRED NOTURNON REDR10-11bKEEPOFFMEDIANR11-1ROADCLOSEDR11-2ROAD CLOSEDLOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY10 MILES AHEADR11-3a BRIDGE OUTLOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY10 MILES AHEADR11-3bROAD CLOSEDTHRU TRAFFICTOR11-4W1-1LW1-1RW1-2L W1-2R
W1-3LW1-3RW1-4LW1-4RW1-5L
W1-5RW1-6LW1-6RW1-7W1-8LW1-8RW2-1
W2-2LW2-2R
W2-3LW2-3RW2-4W2-5
AHEADW3-2
YIELD
AHEADYIELDW3-2aW3-3W4-1LW4-1R
W4-2lW4-2rW4-3LW4-3R
ROADNARROWSW5-1
NARROWBRIDGEW5-2
BUSD9-2DNCSL
FTP-25FTP-29G20-1G20-2G20-2aG20-4
L2LCM1-175BUSINESS75BUSINESS
M2-1M3-1M3-2
M3-3M3-4
M4-10LM4-10RM4-1aM4-5M4-6
M4-7M4-8M4-8aM4-9L
M4-9R
M5-1M5-2M6-1
MOT-1MOT-2
MOT-3
R1-1
R1-2R1-3
R2LC
R2-1
R3-1R3-2R3-4
R4-7aLR4-7aR
R4-7bLR4-7bR

PUSHBUTTONFORGREENLIGHT
R10-1R10-2R10-2aR10-3R10-3aL
R10-3aRR10-4
R10-4aLR10-4aRR10-4bLR10-4bRR10-5
R10-10LR10-10RR10-11a
R12-5
0T00T00T

WEIGHTLIMIT
ONLY
P
PPP
PPPPP
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS GENERAL NOTES:1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES ANDDRIVEWAYS AT ALL TIMES.2.ALL SIGNS SHALL BE REFLECTORIZED AND STANDARD SIZE.3.ALL TUBULAR DELINEATORS AND CONES SHALL BE 28” MINIMUMHEIGHT. REFLECTORIZED AND MAINTAINED ERECT IN THE INDICATED POSITION AT ALLTIMES, AND SHALL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR CLEANED AS NECESSARY TO PRESERVETHEIR APPEARANCE AND CONTINUITY, AND SHALL INCLUDE A 12” HIGH-INTENSITYREFLECTORIZED SLEEVE, IF USED DURING NIGHT-TIME HOURS.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN, ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS, ALL SIGNS, DELINEATORS,BARRICADES, ETC., TO ENSURE PROPER FLOW AND SAFETY OF TRAFFIC DURINGCONSTRUCTION.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL SIGNS, DELINEATORS, BARRICADES, ETC.,PROPERLY INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.6.ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CONTROLS, TRAFFIC SIGNS, OR BARRICADING MAY BE REQUIRED INTHE FIELD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PLACEMENT OF ANYADDITIONAL DEVICES NECESSARY TO ASSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMESDURING CONSTRUCTION.7.MOVE DELINEATORS AND/OR CONES TO SIDEWALK DURING NON-WORKING HOURS.REMOVE BARRICADES ETC. FROM TRAVEL LANE.8.REMOVE OR TURN OFF SIGNS DURING NON-WORK HOURS. GENERAL NOTES: 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LADOT AT (213) 485-2298 A MINIMUM OFSEVEN (7) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO POST “TEMPORARY TOW AWAYNO STOPPING” SIGNS.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL DRIVEWAYS AT ALL TIMES.3.CONTRACTOR MUST SET UP/TEAR DOWN DAILY.4.CONTRACTOR MUST COVER TRENCH WITH STEEL PLATES AFTER WORKING HOURS ANDFEATHER THE EDGE WITH AC AT A SLOPE OF 12:1. PLACE ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS FORSTEEL PLATES.5.NIGHT AND SUNDAY WORK REQUIRE APPROVAL FROM THE POLICE COMMISSION.6.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT.7.DAILY SET UP AND TEAR DOWN OF LANE CLOSURE.8.PLACE STEEL PLATES OVER OPEN TRENCH TO ALLOW ACCESS TO DRIVEWAYS10.INSTALL TEMPORARY NO STOPPING SIGNS11.IF LA BSL IS PERFORMING FOUNDATION REPLACEMENT, ONLY PHASE 3 IS NEEDED PEDESTRIAN NOTES:A DEDICATED INDIVIDUAL WILL BE ASSIGNED THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ESCORTINGPEDESTRIANS THROUGH THE WORK AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THREE MAJORCONSIDERATIONS.1.PEDESTRIANS SHOULD NOT BE LED INTO DIRECT CONFLICT WITH WORK SITE VEHICLES,EQUIPMENT OR OPERATIONS.2.PEDESTRIANS SHOULD NOT BE LED INTO DIRECT CONFLICT WITH MAINLINE TRAFFICMOVING THROUGH OR AROUND THE WORK SITE.3.PEDESTRIANS SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH A REASONABLE SAFE, CONVENIENT ANDACCESSIBLE PATH THAT REPLICATES AS NEARLY AS PRACTICAL THE MOST DESIRABLECHARACTERISTICS OF THE EXISTING SIDEWALK OR 5' MINIMUM FOOTPATH.

SIDEWALK CLOSEDCROSS HERER9-11A(RT)
CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
REV:DATE/BY:REVISION DESCRIPTION
R
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 ORwww.digalert.org
11317 WASHINGTON PL.CULVER CITY, CA 90066LAT: 34.007113LONG: -118.416993 SITE ADDRESS:

SITE INFO:SITE NAME:

SHEET TITLE:

DRAWING INFO
SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN BY:MGCHECKED BY:RS
STAMP:

CLIENT:

ENGINEER/CONSULTANT:

ENGINEER: CHRIS S. LEEPHONE: 949.468.9702 EMAIL: [email protected] REVISIONS TO PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTIONMUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD 01/17/2023CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A/
CIVIL

TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS&NOTES
DRAWING INDEX1 DAY PHASE32'24'16'0"32' 8' 24"x36" SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"11"x17" SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" WORK HOURS: 9:00 A.M. TO 3:00 P.M. MONDAY - FRIDAYCROSS STREET: WASHINGTON PL. & ALBRIGHT AVE.SCOPE OF WORK: LIGHT POLE WORKNEAREST ADDRESS: 11317 WASHINGTON PL. CULVER CITY, CA 90066PROJECT DURATION: 1 DAYWASHINGTON PL. USES:USES WATCHBOOK 2019 PAGE:30 = CONCRETE MIXER
S
= SKID STEER LOADER
= SUPER DUMP TRUCK
= BUCKET TRUCK= CRANE= WORK TRUCK
r/c
= POST TEMPORARY TOW AWAYNO STOPPING ANYTIME SIGNS= POST TEMPORARY TOW AWAY NOSTOPPING ANYTIME SATURDAYONLY SIGNS = WORK AREA= TRAFFIC CONE= HIGH LEVEL WARNING DEVICE= PORTABLE SIGN= EXISTING SIGN= TYPE III BARRICADES= TYPE III BARRICADES W/SIGN= FLASHING ARROW BOARD= FLAGMAN= DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW= PORTABLE FLASHING BEACON P.T.T.A.N.S.A.T.S.P.T.T.A.N.S.A.T.S.O.S.
= EXISTING LANE FLOW DIRECTION= SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION= EXISTING STRIPING= DOUBLE YELLOW LANE LINES= EXISTING RED CURB= TYPE II BARRICADE= EXISTING DRIVEWAYSPEEDDIMENSIONA/B/CADVANCEDWARNING SIGNSPACINGDIMENSIONL MERGINGTAPERLENGTH TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN DIMENSION GUIDELINESDIMENSIONL/2SHIFTINGTAPERLENGTHDIMENSION L/3MINIMUMSHOULDERTAPERDIMENSION "E" BUFFER SPACE ANDFLAGGER STATION STOPPING SIGHTDISTANCEFTFT MPHFTFTFT (0%)FT (-3%)FT (-6%) 251006545155165160

MAXIMUMCHANNELIZERTAPERSPACINGMAXIMUMCHANNELIZERTANGENTSPACINGMAXIMUMCHANNELIZERCONFLICTSPACINGFTFTFT 505050504540353025
1001001001009080706050
252525252220171512 3035404550556065
250250250350350500500500
125180245320540600660720780
90125160270300330360390
6085110180200220240260
200250305360425495570645
205260315380450520600685
215275335400475555640730
NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNER(S) 72 HOURSPRIOR TO THE START OF WORKMAINTAIN ACCESS TO DRIVEWAYS ATALL TIMES N
W11-1
SHARETHEROADW16-1SHOULDERWORKW21-5 A(250') L/3(85') E(250') ENDROAD WORKG20-2(OPTIONAL) ROADWORKAHEAD
W20-1
ENDROAD WORKG20-2(OPTIONAL)
ALBRIGHT AVE.25 MPH
SAWTELL BLVD.35 MPH
GLOBE AVE.25 MPH
405 HWY 405 HWY
A(250')
A(250')

ROADWORKAHEAD
W20-1
A(250')

ROADWORKAHEAD
W20-1

ROADWORKAHEAD
W20-1
A(250')RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIALCOMMERCIAL

RAWLANDRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL75'-0"10'-6"11'-6"
WASHINGTON PL. 35 MPH
WASHINGTON PL. 35 MPH
ALBRIGHT AVE.25 MPHSAWTELL BLVD.35 MPHGLOBE AVE.25 MPH
NOTES:1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TO RELOCATE THE EXISTING BUS STOP IF NECESSARY AT LEAST 3 WEEKS IN ADVANCE. 310-253-5635.2. LANE CLOSURES CAN ONLY OCCUR BETWEEN 9 AM TO 3 PM UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR.3. TRAFFIC CONTROL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD MODIFICATION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR. 0 | 1
Proprietary &
Confidential
Node CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A Primary & Alternate Candidates Coverage Objectives:

Improve Network Capacity and Coverage for customers in the area district defined by Washington Pl. between SawtelleAve. and Albright Ave.

Node ID Candidate Latitude Longitude Structure
Type
Meet Coverage
Objective Comments
CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A
Primary 34.007115 -118.417000 SL Yes Will meet the coverage objectives Alternate 1 34.006949 -118.416873 SL Yes Will meet the coverage objectives, Pole is near a sewage drain
Alternate 2 34.007316 -118.416644 Traffic
Signal Yes Will meet the coverage objectives, Pole
is a traffic signal, ADA ramp is close by
Alternate 3 34.006906 -118.417328 SL Yes Will meet the coverage objectives | 2
Proprietary &
Confidential
Node CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 - A Primary &
Alternate Candidates

City Boundary
Proposed Sites
Crowd Source User data (RSRP)
Good
Moderate
Poor
Crowd Source Mobile User data – Data from May 2022 through Oct 2022 E n g i n e e r i n g D i v i s i o n
9770 CULVER BOULEVARD
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
PHONE (310) 253 - 5600
FAX (310) 253 - 5626
Application Date:

Job Address/Location:

Working Days (required):

Description of Work:

List of required documents:
☐ Location and Zoning Information
☐ Description of the Proposed Project
☐ Prior Approvals/Permits
☐ Map of Applicant’s Existing Wireless
☐ Site Plan
☐ Landscape Plan
☐ Site Photographs
☐ Structural Analysis
☐ Visual Impact Analysis
☐ Noise Study
☐ FCC Radio Frequency Standards
☐ Waiver Request (if applicable)
☐ Notice Letter
☐ Justification for Location/Collocation
Applicant:

Address: City/Zip:

Phone: Email:

Project Number:

Streetlight / Utility Pole Number:

Location / Coordinates:

EXCAVATION
Date Received by Staff:

DESCRIPTION
Other notes:
☐ Bore Pit
☐ Trenching
☐ Potholing
Total # of cuts
Size of cut
Depth of cut
Rev. May 2021
Facilities and Coverage Assessment

EXPRESS MAPPING
4000 Barranca Pkwy #250
Irvine CA 92604
PHONE OR TEXT (949) 771-0051
[email protected]
________________________________________________
Certification of Preparation
The attached list includes the names and addresses of all property owners & occupants within 500' of the exterior boundaries of the following address/APN Address: CA002_CLC_Culver_010-A
Latitude & Longitude: 34.007113, -118.416993
This information was obtained through First American Core Logic, a data source utilizing the county assessor rolls and other available sources. This information is generally deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed. Return of property addresses that are deemed undeliverable by the United States Postal Service is, therefore, a possibility.

Express Mapping. is not responsible for providing further investigation of said labels.

Acceptance of this package acknowledges this fact.

Date: 06/27/2022
___________________________
Laura Emerson
Express Mapping
[email protected]

11/21/2022
Sammy Romo
City of Culver City
Department of Public Works
9770 Culver Bvld
Culver City, CA 90232
Via electronic delivery
RE: Crown C astle application for installation of a Small Wireless Fac ilit y within the publi c w a ys of the Culver City; Crown Castle ID# CA00 2_CLC_ CULVER_010 Dear Mr. Ro
mo,
Crown
Castle Fiber LLC (“Crown Castle”) is submitting the accompanying complete application to install One Small Wireless Facility in the public right -of-way (“ROW”). Please be advised the Federal Communications Commission ( “FCC”) has adopted Rules that impact how the City must process this application. In addition, state law also limits your regulation of Crown Castle’s access to the public rights of way.

Crown Castle’s Deployment
Crown Ca
stle provides telecommunications services to various customers, including wireless carriers. It does so via telecommunications networks installed in the public rights of way that integrate elements , including fiber optic cables as well as personal wireless services facilities, such as antennas and related equipment. The specific equipment sought to be installed by Crown Castle in this case is set forth in the accompanying permit application and meets the definition of Small Wireless Facility provided in the Code of Federal Regulation. 1
Pursuant
to the laws of California, Crown Castle has been granted a certificate of public convenience and necessity (“CPCN”) by the California Public Utility Commission. As a result, Crown Castle must be granted access to the public rights of way in the same manner and on the same terms applicable to other certificated telecommunications providers and utilities. 2 1 See 47 CFR § 1.6002(l).
2 See §253 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Applicable Federal Regulations
Feder
al law and the FCC’s rules implementing the law require that permit applications for the installation of Small Wireless Facilities be processed to a final decision by this local authority without undue delay.

The applicab le federal timeframe (the “Shot Clock period”) to make a decision commences with the submission of an application. 3 Applications proposing the installation of Small Wireless Facilities on a preexisting structure “ for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communications purposes ”4 are collocations, for which the applicable Shot Clock period to make a decision on is 90 days.5
A l
ocal authority must not merely take some action but must fully resolve an application within the applicable timeframe. This means the City must issue all permits required for construction to commence within the applicable Shot Clock period, absent permitted tolling. 6 Pursuant to FCC regulations, an application is deemed complete 10 days after the date of submission unless the authority provides written notice to the applicant that its application is incomplete. 7 If a local authority contends an application is incomplete (thereby tolling the Shot Clock period), within 10 days of submission, it must provide written notice specifying any items it claims are missing to make the application complete. Moreover, for each item alleged to be missing, a local authority must specify the code provision, ordinance, application instruction, or otherwise publicly -stated procedure requiring submission of the information. 8 If
a local authority properly complies with the above requirements regarding incompleteness, the Shot Clock period is tolled. 9 Once the Applicant submits the requested supplemental information, the Shot Clock period resets to 90 days and the local authority then has 10 days to identify which previously - requested items remain missing, if any. 10 However, the local authority cannot at that time request new information outside the scope of its original notice and “once the 10-day period passes, the period of review of the application may not thereafter be tolled for incompleteness.” 11 Further, the Shot Clock period
does not reset upon subsequent resubmissions.

Last
ly, federal regulations place restrictions on the fees and costs state and local authorities may lawfully charge for communications infrastructure deployments. Fees for ROW access and “fees for the use of 3 In the Matter of Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities Siting Policies, etc. Report and Order, FCC 14-153, WT Docket No. 13-238, ¶ 258 (FCC Oct. 17, 2014) (the “Wireless Infr astructure Order”). 4 Wireless Infrastructure Order, at ¶ 178.
5 In the Matter of Accelerating Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, FCC 18-133, WT Docket No. 17-79, ¶¶ 105, 140 (FCC Sept. 27, 2018) (“FCC Order 18-133”). 6 See FCC Order 18-133 at ¶¶ 132-134, 144. See also, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Town of Stoddard, 2012 U.S.

Dist. LEXIS 19453 *13-15 (D.N.H. Feb. 16, 2012) (finding a Shot Clock violation where a local government granted a rehearing on an application after the initial application review process had concluded and the Shot Clock had expired). 7 See 47 CFR § 1.6003, et seq.
8 Id.
9 Id.
10 Id.
11 Id.
government property in the ROW, such as light poles, traffic lights, utility poles, and other similar property suitable for hosting Small Wireless Facilities, as well as application or review fees and similar fees imposed by a state or local government as part of their regulation of the deployment of Small Wireless Facilities inside and outside the ROW, violate Sections 253 or 332(c)(7) unless ... (1) the fees are a reasonable approximation of the state or local government’s costs , (2) only objectively reas onable costs are factored into those fees, and (3) the fees are no higher than the fees charged to similarly -situated competitors in similar situations. ”
12 Purs
uant to federal regulations, the following fees are presumptively reasonable under Section 253 or Section 332(c)(7) of the Telecommunications Act:
(a) $500 for non-recurring fees, including a single up-front application that includes up to five Small Wireless Facilities, with an additional $100 for each Small Wireless Facility beyond five, or (b) $1,000 for non-recurring fees for new structures (non-collocations) intended to support one or more Small Wireless Facilities; and
(c) $270 per Small Wireless Facility per year for all recurring fees, including any possible ROW access fee or fee for attachment to municipally-owned structures in the ROW.13 Crown Castle expressly reserves the right to challenge any fee in excess o f the abov e safe harbor limits and which otherwise f ails to conform to applicable laws and regulations.

Crown Castle’s Applications
The Application Crown Castle submits with this letter proposes collocation and is therefore subject to the FCC 90-day Shot Clock period. As such, the Shot Clock period for the Application is scheduled to expire on February 21st, 2023 . If the City contends that the Application is incomplete, it must issue a valid notice of incompleteness within 10 days of submittal. If no valid notice is issued, the Application will be deemed complete on December 7, 2022 and the 90-day Shot Clock period will not toll, but co ntinue to run until its expiration date on February 21st, 2023.

Crown Castle is committed to working with the City on this project. Please let us know how we can b est assist the City in meetin g its processin g requirements in advan ce of the above deadline s. All written requests for additio nal information regarding may be sent to the following Crown Castle representative:

John Halminski – Network Real Estate Specialist – [email protected] 12 FCC 18-133 at ¶ 50.
13 FCC 18-133 at ¶¶ 78-80.

We appreciate y our attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
CROW

N CASTLE FIBER LLC
John Halminski
Crown Castle
626.241.2117
[email protected]
The CPCN was granted in the name of NTC Network, LLC (“NTC”) by the California Public Utilities Commission’s (“CPUC”) Decision 99-06-083 on June 24, 1999 (Order starts on page 11 of the Decision PDF) and assigned the Utility Number U-6190-C.

NTC merged into Freedom Telecommunications LLC (“Freedom” - Utility Number U-7110-C) by way of a pro forma consolidation. NTC’s Utility Number was transferred to Freedom as the surviving entity. The CPUC accepted NTC’s Advice Letter No. 6 dated May 12, 2014 and Freedom’s Advice Letter No. 4 dated May 12, 2014.

Freedom was merged into Crown Castle Fiber LLC (“Crown Castle Fiber”) with Freedom’s CPCN and Utility Number (U-6910-U) being transferred to Crown Castle Fiber – Freedom’s Advice Letter No. 13 accepted on November 24, 2018

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco CA 94102-3298
EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,
Freedom Telecommunications, Llc
IEC (Corp ID 6190)
Status of Advice Letter 13
As of November 27, 2018
Division Assigned: Telecommunications
Date Filed: 10-26-2018
Date to Calendar: 10-31-2018
Authorizing Documents:

Disposition:

Effective Date:

Resolution Required: No
Resolution Number: None
Commission Meeting Date: None
CPUC Contact Information:

AL Certificate Contact Information:

Pro Forma Consolidation including assumption of CPCN and Utility NumberSubject:

None
Accepted
11-24-2018
Tamar Finn
[email protected]
202-739-3000
[email protected]
415-703-1565
To: Telecommunications Carrier Filing Advice Letter
From: Telecommunications Division PAL Coordinator
Subject: Your Advice Letter Filing
The Telecommunications Division of the California Public Utilities Commission has processed your recent Advice Letter (AL) filing and is returning an AL status certificate for your records.

The AL status certificate indicates:

Advice Letter Number
Name of Filer
CPUC Corporate ID number of Filer
Subject of Filing
Date Filed
Disposition of Filing (Accepted, Rejected, Withdrawn, etc.) Effective Date of Filing
Other Miscellaneous Information (e.g., Resolution, if applicable, etc.) The Telecommunications Division has made no changes to your copy of the Advice Letter Filing; please review your Advice Letter Filing with the information contained in the AL status certificate, and update your Advice Letter and tariff records accordingly.

All inquiries to the California Public Utilities Commission on the status of your Advice Letter Filing will be answered by Telecommunications Division staff based on the information contained in the Telecommunications Division's PAL database from which the AL status certificate is generated. If you have any questions on this matter please contact the:

Telecommunications Division PAL Coordinator at (415) 703-1565, or by e-mail to [email protected]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco CA 94102-3298
EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco CA 94102-3298
EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,
Ntc Network, Inc
IEC (Corp ID 6190)
Status of Advice Letter 6
As of August 11, 2014
Division Assigned: Telecommunications
Date Filed: 05-13-2014
Date to Calendar: 05-16-2014
Authorizing Documents:

Disposition:

Effective Date:

Resolution Required: No
Resolution Number: None
Commission Meeting Date: None
CPUC Contact Information:

AL Certificate Contact Information:

Pro Forma consilidation of NTC and Freedom Telecommunications, LLC (U-7110-C)Subject:

None
Accepted
06-12-2014
Douglas Orvis
[email protected]
202-373-6000
[email protected]
415-703-1565
To: Telecommunications Carrier Filing Advice Letter
From: Telecommunications Division PAL Coordinator
Subject: Your Advice Letter Filing
The Telecommunications Division of the California Public Utilities Commission has processed your recent Advice Letter (AL) filing and is returning an AL status certificate for your records.

The AL status certificate indicates:

Telecommunications Division PAL Coordinator at (415) 703-1565, or by e-mail to [email protected]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco CA 94102-3298
EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,
Filed By Advice Letter Number Tier Date Filed Subject Protested Date Closed Effective Date Days Open Disposition Freedom Telecommunications, Inc. 4 1 5/13/2014 Pro Forma Consilidation of Freedom and NTC Network, LLC (U-6190-C) No 08/11/14 05/13/14 90 Accepted . .
". At.J/TRP lavs' Mailed 6/24199
Decision 99-06-083 June 24,1999
. ' ,

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking on the /
Commission's Own Motion into Competition for Rulemaking 95-04-043 Local Exchange Service. (Filed April 26, 1995) ,
______ ~t:I_:__IIII,1 r~]RMAL FILE COpy
- .. Investigation 95-04-044
Order Instituting Investigation on the
Commission's Own Motion into Competition for
Local Exchange Service.

OPINION
(Filed April 26, 1995)
(Petition Nos. 132, 133, 134,
135, 136, 137,138, 139
140, and 142)
By this decision, we grant the petitions for certificates of public convenience and necessity (CPCN) to operate as facilities-based competitive local carriers (CLCs) and to offer resold local exchange services within the territories of Pacific Bell (Pacific), GTE California Incorporated (GTEC), Roseville Telephone Company (RTC), and Citizens Telephone Company (CTC), for those petitioners as set forth in Appendix B of this decision, subject to the terms and conditions included herein. We also grant petitioners' requests for intrastate interLocal Access and Transport Areas (interLATA) and intraLATA authority on a statewide basis as designated in Appendix B.

I. Background
We initially established rules for entry of facilities-based CLCs in Decision (D.) 95-07-054. Under those procedures, we processed a group of c?ndidates that filed petitions for CPCNs by Septe~ber 1, 1995, and granted authority effective January 1, 1996, for qualifying CLCs to provide facilities-based competitive local 45871 -1-
R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ/TRP /avs
exchange service in the territories of Pacific and GTEC. We authorized CLCs seeking to provide resale-based services to begin operations on March 1, 1996.

We further advised prospective entrants that any filings from nonqualifying CLCs, and any filing for CLC operating authority made after September 1, 1995, wou~d be. tre~te~ ~s st~dard applications and processed in the normal course bf the Commission's business.

By 0.96-12-020, effective January 1, 1997, we instituted quarterly processing cycles for granting CPCN authority for facilities-based CLCs in order to streamline the approval process for these particular carriers. Since we had been processing the environmental impact review required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ona consolidated basis for groups of qualifying facilities-based CLCs, we concluded in 0.96-12-020 that it would be more efficient and consistent to process other aspects of the CLC filings on a consolidated basis, as well. Accordingly, we directed that any CLC filing on or after January 1, 1997, for facilities-based CPCN authority was to make its filing in the form of a petition to be docketed in Investigation (1.) 95-04-044 that would be processed quarterly on a consolidated basis. CLCs seeking only resale authority continued to file individual applications.

On September 24, 1997, we adopted 0.97-09-115 in which we extended the coverage of our adopted rules for local exchange competition to include the service territories of California's two midsized local exchange carriers (MSLECs), RTC and CTC. In that decision, we also authorized candidates seeking CLC CPCN authority within the MSLECs' territories to immediately begin making filings following the applicable entry rules previously adopted in 0.95-07-054 and subsequent decisions. Specifically, requests for CLC CPCN authority for facilities-based service were to be filed in the form of a petition docketed in

1.95-04-044, while resellers have sought authority through applications. In -2-
.. ..;.
:;.
.. .. R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 AL} /TRP / avs
D.98-01-055, we approved the first group of petitions for facilities-based CPCNs to offer local exchange service within the MSLEC territories.

In this decision, we approve CPCNs for those facilities-based CLCs which filed petitions during the first quarter of 1999 and satisfied all applicable rules for certification as established in Rulemaking (R.) 95-04-043. The Petitioners identified in Appendix B will be authorized to begin offering service upon the filing of tariffs and compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in this order.

II. CECA Review
We have reviewed the petitions for compliance with CEQA. CEQA requires the Commission to assess the potential environmental impact of a project in order that adverse effects are avoided, alternatives are investigated, and environmental quality is restored or enhanced to the fullest extent possible.

To achieve this objective, Rule 17.1 of the Commission's Rules requires the proponent of any project subject to Commission approval to submit with the petition for approval of such project a Proponent's Environmental Assessment (PEA). The PEA is used by the Commission to focus on any impacts of the project which may be of concern, and prepare the Commission's Initial Study to determine whether the project needs a Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

Based on its assessment of the facilities-based petitions and PEAs, the Commission staff prepared a Negative Declaration and Initial Study generally describing the facilities-based Petitioners' projects and their potential environmental effects. The Negative Declaration prepared by the Commission staff is considered a Mitigated Neg~tive Declaration (MND). This means that, although the initial study identified potentially significant impacts, revisions -3-
R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ /TRP / avs
which mitigate the impacts to a less than significant level have been agreed to by the Petitioners. (Pub. Res. Code § 21080(c)(2);)-
A. Results of the Negative Declaration
On April 29, 1999, the Negative Declaration and Initial Study were sent to various city and county planning agencies, as well as public; libraries throughout the state for review and comment by May 28, 1999. The Commission staff prepared a public notice which announced the preparation of the draft negative declaration, the locations where it was available for review, and the deadline for written comments. The public notice was advertised in newspapers throughout the state. The draft Negative Declaration was also submitted to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research where it was circulated to affected state agencies for review and comment.

Public comments on the draft Negative Declaration were reviewed and answered, as necessary. The Commission staff then finalized the MND covering all facilities-based CLC petitions listed in Appendix B. The finalized MND includes a list of mitigation measures with which the CLCs must comply as a condition of their CPCN authority. The MND includes a Mitigation Monitoring Plan to ensure that the mitigation measures are followed and implemented as intended. A copy of the MND is attached to this decision as Apper.dix D. We hereby approve the MND as finalized by staff. Concurrently with our approval of the MND, we grant the request of the Petitioners in Appendix B for CPCN authority subject to the terms and conditions set forth in our order below.

B. Required Payment of CEaA Deposit
Commission Decision 97-04-046 stipulates that all petitioners for CLC authority must submit with their filing an initial payment of $2000 to cover CEQA costs. The $2000 payment is used to cover the Commission's costs for -4-
.~.
" R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ/TRP /avs
preparing and publishing the Mitigated Negative Declaration for each qualifying petitioner, as required by CEQA law .. As of the date of this order, the . Commission has received payment of the required $2000 deposit from each of the CLCs, as identified in Appendix B.

III. Review of CPCN Petitions
A. Overview
The CLC petitions have been reviewed for compliance with the certification-and-entry rules (Rules) adopted in Appendices A and B of

0.95-07-054 and subsequent decisions in R.95-04-043/1.95-04-044. Consistent with our goal of promoting a competitive market as rapidly as possible, we are granting authority to all of the facilities-based CLCs that filed during the first quarter of 1999 and met the Rules. The Rules are intended to protect the public against unqualified or unscrupulous carriers, while also encouraging and easing the entry of CLC providers to promote the rapid growth of competition.

Petitioners had to demonstrate that they possessed the requisite managerial qualifications, technical competence, and financial resources to provide facilities-based local exchange service. Petitioners were also required to submit proposed tariffs which conform to the consumer protection rules set forth in Appendix B of D.95-07-054. In response to a notice of tariff deficiencies, the various petitioners submitted tariff corrections. Except for the outstanding deficiencies noted in Appendix C, the petitioners' proposed tariffs are found to be satisfactory with no deficiencies noted.

As prescribed in Rule 4.B.(1), prospective facilities-based CLCs must also show that they possess a minimum of $100,000 in cash or cash-equivalent resources, as defined in the Rules. In.order to demonstrate that they possess the requisite financial resources, petitioners submitted copies of recent financial -5-
R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ/TRP lavs
statements. Because the financial statements contain commercially sensitive information, the petitioners filed motions for limited protective orders to restrict the financial statements and related documents containing commercially sensitive information from public disclosure pursuant to General Order (GO) 66-C. We grant those motions as prescribed in our order below.

Based upon our review, we conclude that each of the facilities-based Petitioners identified in Appendix B, has satisfactorily complied with our certification requirements for entry, including the consumer protection rules set forth in D.95-07-054, subject to correcting any tariff deficiencies in Appendix C, payment of the required CEQA deposit, and satisfying the additional conditions set forth in the ordering paragraphs below. Accordingly, we grant these Petitioners authority to offer facilities-based and resold local exchange service within the territories of Pacific and GTEC and, where requested, within the CTC and RTC territories. We also grant the statewide inter- and intraLATA authority as requested.

Pursuant to 0.97-09-115, CLC resale authority within the RTC and CTC ,~~ territories was authorized to be~ome effective on or after April 1, 1998. As we stated in D.97-09-115, until the time that tariffed wholesale discount rates are adopted for RTC and CTC, individual CLCs certificated to resell local service within the CTC/RTC territories may enter into negotiations with each of the MSLECs to seek agreement on an interim wholesale discount rate. Disputes over the terms of resale arrangements may be submitted to the Commission for arbitration pursuant to the provisions of Section 252(b)(1) of the Telecommunication Act of 1996 and Commission Resolution ALJ-174. -6-
• R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ ITRP I avs
B. Motion of DSLnet
DSLnet Communications, LLC("DSLnet"), attempted to file a petition (# 142) for CLC local exchange authority on March 31,1999, with the intention of being included in the Commission's quarterly ''batch'' review of such petitions filed during the first quarter of 1999. However, DSLnet subsequently learned that, due to certain confusion surrounding whether DSLnet's Petition was complete for purposes of the Commission's review, the Commission did not technically accept DSLnet's petition until April 13, 1999. As a result, it is now too late for DSLnet's Petition to be included in the Commission's quarterly review process for such petitions filed during the first quarter of 1999, at least to the extent DSLnet seeks facilities-based authority.

Nonetheless, in order to allow DSLnet to initiate competitive telecommunications service in California as soon as possible, DSLnet filed a motion on May 4, 1999, asking the Commission to: (1) immediately consider the portion of DSLnet's Petition seeking authority to resell local exchange telecommunications services, and (2) consider the portion of DSLnet's Petition seeking facilities-based authority in the Commission's quarterly review process for Petitions filed during the second quarter of 1999.

No party has objected to the motion of DSLnet. We consider the request of DSLnet for consideration of the resale portion of its petition in the current quarterly review to be reasonable, under the circumstances and shall grant it.

Due to the timing requirements relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration, DSLI).et's request for facilities-based authority cannot be considered during the current quarter, but shall be deferred to the subsequent quarterly review period.
-7-
R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ /TRP / avs
IV. Compliance With Section 311
In compliance with Pub. Util. Code Section 311 (g)(2), this is an uncontested matter in which the decision grants the relief requested.

Accordingly, pursuant to Pub. Util. Code Section 311 (g)(2), the otherwise applicable 3D-day period for public review and comment is being waived.

Findings of Fact

1. Nine petitioners filed requests during the first quarter of 1999 seeking a CPCN to provide competitive local exchange services in the territories of various California incumbent local exchange carriers as set forth in Appendix B.

2. An additional petitioner, DSLnet attempted to file during the first quarter, but the filing was not actually docketed until April 13, 1999. DSLnet subsequently filed an uncontested motion seeking to have its lequest for CLC resale authority to be considered as part of the first quarterly group of CLCs. ,3. No protests to the CLC petitioners have been filed.

4. A hearing is not required.

5. By prior Commission decisions, we authorized competition in providing local exchange telecommunications service within the service territories of Pacific, GTEC, RTC, and CTC for carriers meeting specified criteria.

6. The Petitioners listed in Appendix B have demonstrated that each of them has a minimum of $100,000 in cash or cash equivalent reasonably liquid and readily available to meet its start-up expenses.

7. Petitioners' technical experience is demonstrated by supporting documentation which provides summary biographies of their key management personnel.

8. Except as noted in Appendix,C, Petitioners have each submitted a complete draft of their initial tariff which complies with the requirements -8-
'rI
".

R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 AL} /TRP / avs . .
established by the Commission, including prohibitions on unreasonable deposit requirements.

9. Commission 0.97-04-046 stipulates that all petitioners for CLC authority must submit with their filing an initial payment of $2,000 to cover the Commission's costs for preparing and publishing the Mitigated Negative Oeclaration pursuant to CEQA.

10. Each of the CLCs, as identified in Appendix B, has submitted the required $2,000 CEQA deposit as of the date of this order.

11. By 0.97-06-107, petitioners or applicants for CLC authority are exempt from Rule 18(b).

12. Exemption from the provisions of Pub. Util. Code §§ 816-830 has been granted to other nondominant carriers. (See, e.g., 0.86-10-007 and 0.88-12-076.)

13. The transfer or encumbrance of property of nondominant carriers has been exempted from the requirements of Pub. Util. Code § 851 whenever such transfer or encumbrance serves to secure debt. (See 0.85-11-044.) Conclusions of Law

1. Each of the Petitioners listed in Appendix B has the financial ability to provide the proposed services, and has made a reasonable showing of technical expertise in telecommunications.

2. Public convenience and necessity require the competitive local exchange services to be offered by Petitioners subject to the terms, conditions, and restrictions set forth below.

3. Each Petitioner is subject to:
a. The current 0.0% surcharge applicable to all intrastate services except for those excluded by 0.94-09-065, as
modified by 0.95-02-050, to fund the Universal Lifeline Telephone Service (Pub. Util. Code § 879;
Resolution T-16245, Oecember 3,1998);
-9-
R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ /TRP / avs
b. The current 0.192% surcharge applicable to all intrastate services except for those excluded by 0.94-09-065, as
modified by 0.95-02-050, to fund the California Relay
Service and Communications Oevices Fund
(Pub. Util. Code § 2881; Resolution T-16234; 0.98-12-073" December 17, 1998);
c. The user fee provided in Pub. Util. Code §§ 431-435, which is

0.11% of gross intrastate revenue for the 1998-1999 fiscal year (Resolution M-4789);
d. The current surcharge applicable to all intrastate services except for those excluded by 0.94-09-065, as modified by

0.95-02-050, to fund the California High Cost Fund-A
(Pub. Util. Code § 739.30; 0.96-10-066, pp. 3-4, App. B, Rule I.C; Resolution T-16242 at 0.0% for 1999,
Oecember 3,1998);
e. The current 3.8% surcharge applicable to all intrastate services except for those excluded by 0.94-09-065, as
modified by 0.95-02-050, to fund the California High Cost.

Fund-B (0.96-10-066, p. 191, App. B, Rule 6.F., Resolution T-16244, Oecember 3, 1998); and,
f. The current 0.05% surcharge applicable to all intrastate services except for those excluded by 0.94-09-065, as
modified by 0.95-02-050, to fund the California Teleconnect Fund (0.96-10-066, p. 88, App. B, Rule 8.G, Resolution
T-16165; August 1, 1998).

4. Petitioners should be exempted from Rule 18(b).

5. Petitioners should be exempted from Pub. Util. Code §§ 816-830.

6. Petitioners should be exempted from Pub. Util. Code § 851 when the transfer or encumbrance serves to secure debt.

7. Each of the Petitioners must agree to, and is required to, carry out any specific mitigation measures adopted in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), attached as Appendix D, in compliance with CEQA. -10 -
R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ /TRP / avs

8. With the incorporation of the specific mitigation measures in the final MND, the Petitioners' proposed projects .will not have potentir.lly significant adverse environmental impacts.

9. The Petitioners should be granted CPCNs subject to the terms, conditions, and restrictions set forth in the order below.

10. Any CLC which does not comply with our rules for local exchange competition adopted in R.95-04-043 shall be subject to sanctions including, but not limited to, revocation of its CLC certificate.

ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN), shall be granted to each of the Petitioners listed in Appendix B (Petitioners) to permit each of them to operate as a facilities-based provider of competitive local exchange telecommunications services, as a reseller of competitive local exchange telecommunications services within the servke territories as noted in Appendix B and, as a statewide non dominant interexchange carrier (NDIEC), as noted m Appendix B, contingent on compliance with the terms identified in .

Appendix B and in the remainder of this order.

2. Each Petitioner shall file a written acceptance of the certificate granted in this proceeding prior to commencing service.

3. a. The Petitioners are authorized to file with this Commission tariff schedules for the provision of competitive local exchange, intraLATA (Local Access Transport Area) toll and intrastate interLATA services, as applicable. The Petitioners may not offer these services until tariffs are on file, and until any applicable deficiencies as noted in Appendix C have been corrected. Petitioners' -11-
R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ /TRP / avs
initial filing shall be made in accordance with General Order (GO) 96-A, excluding Sections IV, V, and VI, and shall be effective not less than one day after approval by the Telecommunications Division.
b. The Petitioners are competitive local carriers (CLCs). The effectiveness of each of their future tariffs is subject to the schedules set forth in Decision (0.) 95-07-054, Appendix A, § 4E.

A. I/E. CLCs shall be subject to the following tariff and contract-filing, revision and service-pricing standards:
1/(1) Uniform rate reductions for exishng tariff services shall become effective on five (5) working days' notice to the Commission. Customer notification is not required for rate decreases.
1/(2) Uniform major rate increases for existing tariff services'shall become effective on thirty (30) days' notice to the
Commission, and shall require bill inserts, or a message on the bill itself, or first class mail notice to customers at least 30 days in advance of the pending rate increase.
1/(3) Uniform minor rate increases, as defined in 0.95-07-054, shall become effective on not less than five (5) working days' notice to the Commission. Customer notification is not required for such minor rate increases.
11(4) Advice letter filing for new services and for all other types of tariff revisions, except changes in text not affecting rates or relocations of text in the tariff schedules, shall become effective on forty (40) days' notice to the Commission. 11(5) Advice letter filings revising the text or location of text material which do not result in an increase in any rate or charge shall become effective on not less than five (5) days' notice to the Commission.
"(6) Contracts shall be subject to GO 96-A rules for NDIECs, except interconnection contracts.
-12 -
'Ii
• R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ/TRP lavs
1/(7) CLCs shall file tariffs in accordance with Public Utilities (Pub. Util.) Code Section 876."

4. The Petitioners may deviate from the following provi~ions of GO 96-A:
(a) paragraph 11.C.(1)(b), which requires consecutive sheet numbering and prohibits the reuse of sheet numbers, and (b) paragraph II.C.(4), which requires that I/ a separate sheet or series of sheets should be used for each rule." Tariff filings incorporating these deviations shall be subject to the approval of the COmmlssion's Telecommunications Division. Tariff filings shall reflect all fees and surcharges to which Petitioners are subject, as described in Conclusion of Law 3; Petitioners are also exempt from GO 96-A Section II.G.(l) and (2) which require service of advice letters on competing and adjacent utilities, unless such utilities have specifically requested such service.

5. Each Petitioner shall file as part of its initial tariffs, after the effective date of this order and consistent with Ordering Paragraph 3, a service area map.

6. Prior to initiating service, each Petitioner shall provide the Commission's Consumer Services Division with the Petitioner's designated contact persons for purposes of resolving consumer complaints and the corresponding telephone numbers. This information shall be updated if the names or telephone numbers change or at least annually.

7. Where applicable, each Petitioner shall notify this Commission in writing of the date local exchange service is first rendered to the public within five days after service begins. The same procedure shall be followed for the authorized intraLATA and interLATA services, where applicable.

8. Each Petitioner shall keep its books and records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
-13 -
R.95-04-043,1.95-04-044 ALJ/TRP lavs

9. Petitioners shall each file an annual report, in compliance with GO 104-A, on a calendar-year basis using the information-request form developed by the Commission Staff and contained in Appendix A.

10. Petitioners shall ensure that its employees comply with the provisions of Pub. Util. Code § 2889.5 regarding solicitation of customers.

11. The certificate granted and the authority to render service under the rates, charges, and rules authorized will expire if not exercised within 12 months after the effective date of this order.

12. The corporate identification number assigned to each Petitioner, as set. forth in Appendix B, shall be included in the caption of all original filings with this Commission, and in the titles of other pleadings filed in existing cases.

13. Within 60 days of the effective date of this order, each Petitioner shall comply with Pub. Util. Code § 708, Employee Identification Cards, reflecting its authority, and notify the Director of the Telecommunications Di-;ision in writing of its compliance.

14. Each Petitioner is exempted from the provisions of Pub. Util. Code §§ 816-830.

15. Each Petitioner is exempted from Pub. Util. Code § 851 for the transfer or encumbrance of property, whenever such transfer or encumbrance serves to secure debt.

16. If any Petitioner is 90 days or more late in filing an annual report or in remitting the fees listed in Conclusion of Law 4, Telecommunications Division shall prepare for Commission consideration a resolution that revokes that Petitioner's CPCN, unless that Petitioner has received written permission from Telecommunications Division to file or remit late.
-14 -
..

R.95-o4-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ /TRP / avs

17. The Final Mitigated Negative Declaration, including the Mitigation Monitoring Plan, attached as Appendix D of this decision is hereby approved . and adopted. .

18. Each of the Petitioners listed in Appendix B shall comply with the conditions and carry out the mitigation measures outlined in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration.

19. Each of the Petitioners shall provide the Director of the Commission's Energy Division with reports on compliance with the conditions and implementation of mitigation measures under the schedule outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

20. Petitioners shall comply with the consumer protection rules set forth in Appendix B of D.95-07-054.

21. Petitioners shall compiy with the Commission's rules for local exchange competition in California that are set forth in Appendix C of D.95-12-o56, including the requirement that CLCs shall place customer deposits in a protected, segregated, interest-bearing escrow account subject to Commission oversight.

22. Petitioners shall comply with the customer notification and education rules adopted in D.96-04-049 regarding the passage of calling party number.

23. Petitioners' respective motions for a limited protective order keeping designated documents containing financial and other operating information confidential are granted. Such documents will remain under seal for one year from today unless a petitioner makes a timely request for extension of confidential treatment of its documents by filing a separate motion with good cause shown.

24. The motion of DSLnet to have the resale portion of its CLC petition considered in the current quarterly cycle is granted.
-15 -
R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ /TRP I avs

25. The petitions listed in Appendix B are granted only as set forth above.

This order is effective today.

Dated June 24, 1999, at San Francisco, California.

RICHARD A. BILAS
President
HENRY M. DUQUE
JOSIAH L. NEEPER
JOEL Z. HYATT
CARLW.WOOD
Commissioners
.
"I
.-
ceCifi d as a True Copy
--- of th~' >ri9}nal '
. JA1t fl, / Z {/.~/<.--.

ASSf. EXECUTIVE DIREC OR. PI~~U: UT4LITIES MfSSIOll
"ATE II' QLIfORNIA
-16 -
. ~.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ /TRP / avs

APPENDIX A

Page 1 of 2 ends

TO: ALL COMPETITIVE LOCAL CARRIERS AND INTEREXCHANGE

TELEPHONE UTILITIES
Article 5 of the Public Utilities Code grants authority to the California Public Utilities Commission to require all public utilities doing business in California to file reports as specified by the Commission on the utilities' California operations.

A specific annual report form has not yet been prescribed for the California interexchange telephone utilities. However, you are hereby directed to submit an original and two copies of the information requested in Attachment A no later than March 31st of the year following the calendar year for which the annual report is submitted.
,Address your report to: :

California Public Utilities Commission
Auditing and Compliance Branch, Room 3251
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3298
Failure to file this information on time may result in a penalty as provided for in §§ 2107 and 2108 of the Public Utilities Code.

If you have any question conceining this matter, please call (415) 703-1961.

R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ /TRP / aV5

APPENDIX A

Page 2 of 2 ends

"Information Requested of California Competitive Local Carriers and Interexchange Telephone Utilities.

To be filed with the California Public Utilities Commission, 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 3251, San Francisco, CA 94102-3298, no later than March 31st of the year following the calendar year for which the annual report is submitted.

1. Exact legal name and U # of reporting utility.

2. Address.

3. Name, title, address, and telephone number of the person to be contacted concerning the reported informa~~on.

4. Name and title of the officer having custody of the general books of account and the address of the office where such books are kept.

5. Type of organization (e.g., corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.).

If incorporated, specify:
a. Date of filing articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State. b. State in which incorporated.

6. Commission decision number granting operating authority and the date of that decision.

7. Date operations were begun.

8. Description of other business activities in which the utility is engaged. 9 .. A list of all affiliated companies and their relationship to the utility. State if affiliate is a:
a. Regulated public utility.
b. Publicly held corporation.

10. Balance sheet as of December 31st of the yea,r for which information is submitted.

11. Income statement for California operations for the calendar year for which information is submitted.
(END OF APPENDIX A)
.
'\

. R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ/TRP /avs*

APPENDIXC
LIST OF CLC Tariff Deficiencies

Page 1 of 4 ends

Eagle Communications, Pet. 132
Eagle Communications was to file a supplement to its petition as previously requested by the Telecommunications Staff to correct the many deficiencies to its tariffs. To date, it has not filed a supplement to correct the identified deficiencies. Eagle must file a revised set of tariffs that fully comply with D.95-07-054, 0.95-12-056, 0.95-12-057, 0.96-04-049.

Network Plus - Pet. 136
Deficiencies in Network Plus's Proposed Tariffs

1. On each tariff sheet, (1) replace the phrase above the top horizontal line "Local Exchange Services" to "Competitive Local Carrier Tariff" and (2) add a vertical line on both the left and right margins.

2. Sheet No.3, Preliminary Statement, 1.1, last paragraph. Replace the phrase "to resell local exchange telecommunications services within the State of California" to "to provide facilities-based and resale local exchange services as a competitive local carrier in the service areas of Pacific Bell, GTEC, Citizens and Roseville Telephone Companies."

3. Sheet No. 13, Rule 1, Definitions. Include the definitions adopted in Decision 95-07-054 for: (1) Major Rate Increase, and (2) Minor Rate L .. crease.

4. Sheet No. 17, Rule 3, Customer Application for Service. Revise tariffs to fully comply with the provisions of Rule 2, Appendix B of Decision 95-07-054, (e.g., service initiation based on a written or oral agreement; confirmation letter R.95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ /TRP / avs*

APPENDIX C
LIST OF CLC Tariff Deficiencies

Page 2 of 4 ends

5. briefly describing services, in case of an oral agreement; statement of terms/ conditions for all new customers, etc~} ..

6. Sheet No. 18, Rule 5, Contracts and Agreements. Delete language re effectivity on five days' notice for "subsequent completed contracts." All contracts shall be subject to the 40-day notice until revised by the Commission.

7. Sheet No. 19. (1) Rule 6, Special Information Required on Forms. Revise tariff language to fully comply with the provisions of Rule 3 (A) and (B), Appendix B of Decision 95-07-054. (2) Rule 7, Establishment and Re-establishment of Credit. Include language on situations when deposits are not required. (See Rule 4, Appendix B of Decision 95-O7-O54.)

8. Sheet No. 20. (1) Rule 8, Advance Payments. Revise tariff language to indicate that advance payments shall be credited on the customer's first bill. (2) Deposits. Include language on the interest rate to be added to deposits. (See Rule 5, Appendix B of Decision 95-07-054.)

9. Sheet No. 21, Rule 9, Notices. (1) Revise tariff to indicate that cancellation of service by customers may be either verbal or written. (2) Include tariff language on rates and rate revisions and information on notices of discontinuance by a competitive local carrier. (See Rule 6, Appendix B of Decision 95-07-054.)

10. Sheet No. 22, Rule 10, Cancellation of Service by Company. Revise tariff to indicate that notice of discontinuance of service by a company for nonpayment of bills shall be provided in writing by first class mail to the customer not less .than 7 calendar days prior to termination.
.... t95-04-043, 1.95-04-044 ALJ ITRP I av5*

APPENDIX C
LIST OF CLC Tariff Deficiencies

Page 3 of 4 ends

11. Sheet No. 25, Rule 16, Rendering and Payment of Bills. Note that a five-month back billing period for error files and one and one-half years back billing period for fraud are applicable only to interexchange service prov1 ders. Revise tariff accordingly. (See Decision 88-09-061.)

12. Sheet Nos. 27 through 31, Liability of the Company. Adopt either Pacific Bell's or GTEC's limitation of liability. The limitation of liability of these companies are appended to Decision 95-12-057.

13. Sheet 36, Rule 25, Additional Provisions, etc., Section D. Include language to indicate that deposits will be refunded with interest within 30 days after discontinuance of service or 12 months of service, whichever comes first.

14. Sheet 37, Rule 26, Additional Provisions, etc. Comply with the back billing provisions of Decision 88-09-061 for local exchange service providers.

15. Sheet 68, Custom Calling Services. Briefly describe each feature. Delete any reference to Caller 1D service. This service can only be provided upon compliance with the customer notification and education rules adopted in Decision 96-04-049.

16. Sheet 72, Taxes and Surcharges. Update the applicable California surcharges. The current surcharges are: (1) Reimbursement Fee - 0.11 %; (2) ULTS - 0.00%; (3) CHCF-A- 0.00%; (4) CHCF-B - 3.8%; (5) California Relay Service & Communications Devices Fund - 0.192%; (6) California Teleconnect FUnd - 0.05%.

17. Include tariffs on: (1) Directories, (2) Non-published service, (3) Demarcation points, (4) Pro-rating of bills, (5) Change of service provider,

95-04-043., 1.95-04-044 ALJ /TRP / avs

APPENDIXD
NEGATIVE DECLARATION (14)
Competitive Local Carriers' (CLCs)
Projects for Local Exchange Telecommunications Service throughout California.

The subject of this Negative Declaration are nine current petitions/applications for authorization to provide facilities based local telephone services. (See Appendix B).

The California Public Utilities Commission is the lead agency in approving these petitioners' intent to compete in the local exchange market. Additional approvals by other agencies may be required depending upon the scope and type of construction proposed by the petitioner (e.g. federal,other state agencies, and ministerial permits by local agencies).

Because the subject projects of the nine current petitioners are similar, with some modifications, to the projects proposed by the past petitioners, the Commissi~n incorporates, in whole, Negative Declaration 13 for these nine petitions/applications, and will refer to the incorporated documents as "Negative Declaration 14" (Section 15150 of CEQ A Guidelines). The public comment period for the Draft Negative Declaration 14 begms on April 29, 1999 and expires on May 28, 1999~ Comments should be addressed to: John Boccio, Project Manager, California Public Utilities Commission, Energy Division, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102, Fax:
(415) 703-2200, E-Mail: [email protected]. For further information call Mr. Boccio at (415) 703-2641.

BACKGROUND
The California Public Utilities Commission's Decision 95-07-054 enables telecommunications companies to compete with local telephone companies in providing local exchange service.

Previous to this decision, local telephone service was monopolized by a single utility per service territory. The Commission initially received 66 petitions from companies to provide competitive local telephone service throughout areas presently served by Pacific Bell and GTE California.

The 66 petitioners i~cluded cable television companies, cellular (wireless) companies; long- distance service providers, local telephone service providers, and various other telecommunication companies that specialize in transporting data.

Forty of the sixty-six petitions were for approval of facilities-based services, which means that the petitioners proposed to use their own facilities in providing local telephone service. The remaining 26 petitions were strictly for approval of resale-based services, meaning that telephone I Wireless companies covered in the Negative Declarations adopted by the Commission for entry in the local telephone market are also subject to Commission General Order (G.O. IS9A). G.O. lS9A delegates to local governments the authority to issue discretionary permits for the approval of proposed sites for wireless facilities.

Commission adoption of the Negative Declarations is not intended to supersede or invalidate the requirements contained in General Order IS9A.
1 service will be resold using another competitor's facilities. (Most of the facilities-based petitioners offer resale-based services as well.) The 40 facilities-based petitions indicated that physical modifications to existing facilities may be required, and construction of new facilities was a possibility in the long-term. The 26 resale-based petitions were strictly financial and billing arrangements that involved no construction and were therefore considered to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).

The Commission issued a draft Negative Declaration for the initial 40 facilities-based petitioners in October 1995. Comments on the draft Negative Declaration covered issues such as traffic congestion, public safety, cumulative impacts, aesthetic impacts, and physical wear on streets.

These comments were addressed and the Negative Declaration was modified to some extent in response to the comments. In December 1995, Commission Decision 0.95-12-057 adopted a final mitigated Negative Declaration finding that the proposed projects of ihe initial 40 facilities- based petitioners would not have potentially significant environmental effects with specified mitigation measures incorporated by the projects.

Following the 'adoption ofD.95-12-057, the Commission received eight additional petitions for facilities-based services. The eight petitioners included cable television companies, resale-based providers approved by D.95-12-057, and other telecommunication companies. Following the public comment period, the Commission made minor modifications to the first Negative Declaration, and in September 1996, the Commission adopted the second Negative Declaration for these eight companies (D.96-09-072). (This Negative Declaration is sometimes referred to as "Negative Declaration II"). In January 1997, the Commission adopted a third Nega~ve De~laration for eight more facilities-based petitioners. "Negative Declaration III" is virtually the same document as Negative Declaration II because the proposed projects of the eight petitionerS were no different from the projects proposed by the two groups of petitioners that preceded them.

Following the issuance of Negative Declaration III, ten subsequent Negative Declarations, Negative Declaration IV (0.97-04-011), Negative Declaration V (0.97-06-100), Negative Declaration VI (D.97-09-110), Negative Declaration Vll (097-12-084), Negative Declaration IX (0.98-03-066), Negative Declaration X (D. 98-06-067), Negative Declaration 11 (D.98-09-66), and Negative Declaration 12 (0.98-12-083) and Negative Declaration 13 (D.99-03-050) have been adopted by the Commission in granting authority to provide facilities based local telecommunication services under essentially the same circumstances. (Negative Declaration VIII addressed telecommunication companies petitioning to provide services in the Roseville Telephone Company and Citizens Telephone Company of California service areas only). 'Negative Declaration IV addressed nine petitioners, Negative Declaration V addressed six petitioners, Negative Declaration VI addressed eight petitioners Negative Declaration VII addressed five petitioners, Negative Declaration VIII addressed eleven petitioners, Negative Declaration IX addressed eleven petitioners, Negative Declaration X addressed, two petitioners and Negative Declaration 11 addressed eight petitioners and Negative Declaration 12 addressed twelve petitioners.
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Following the adoption of Negative Declaration 13, the Conimission received nine more petitions/applications for facilities-based services. These petitioners are the subject of this Negative Declaration. (See Appendix B for a list of the current facilities~based petitioners.) Similar to 'the earlier petitioners, most of the current petitioners are initially targeting local telephone service for areas where their telecommunications infrastructure is already established, and therefore only minor construction is envisioned. Services provided will include ~ut not be limited to voice, data, video, internet and other telecommUnications services. The petitioners will need to make some modifications to their existing facilities; these modifications are minor in nature, the most common being the installation of a switch that connects potential customers to outside systems. Switch installation is necessary because customers receiving a particular type of service may not have access to local telephone networks. For example, customers receiving cable television service are presently unable to connect to local. telephone networks because of the differences in modes of service. A switch installation by a cable television provider is one step that makes the connection possible. Switch installation is considered a minor modification because it typically involves a single installation within an existing central communication facility or building.

Besides the minor modifications, some of the companies are planning to install their own fiber optic cables to provide adequate service. Cables will be installed within existing utility underground conduits or ducts, or attached to utility poles with existing overhead lines whenever possible. Fiber optic cables are extremely thin, and existing conduits will likely be able to hold multiple cables. However, if existing conduits or poles are unable to accommodate additional cables, then new conduits or poles will need to be constructed by the petitioner. In this case, the petitioners will construct within ~xisting utility rights-of-way. There is also the possibility that the petitioners may attempt to access other rights-of-way (such as roads) to construct additional conduits. Extension of ~xisting rights-of-way into undisturbed areas is not likely, but a possibility. ,
The installation of fiber optic cables into underground conduits will vary in complexity depending upon the conditions of the surrounding area. For example,in urban, commercial areas, utility conduits can be accessible with minimal groundbreaking and installation simply requires stringing the cable through one end of the conduit and connecting it to the desired end.

In this case, major excavation of the right-of-way is unnecessary. However, there may also be conditions where access to the conduit will require trenching and excavation.

Some of the petitioners have plans to construct service boxes or cabinets which contain batteries for the provision of power or emergency power. The dimensions of the boxes vary, but basically range from three to five feet in height. Depending upon the type of technology and facilities operated by the petitioner, smaller service boxes (approximately 3 inches in height) would be used for power supply and backup power. Those petitioners who have no plans to use such 3 boxes already have capable power and backup power within their existing facilities. The petitioners who will need such boxes, have committed to placing the boxes in existing buildings, or in underground vaults. If conditions do not permit building or underground installation, the petitioners would use small low-profile boxes that are landscaped and fenced.

While most of the petitioners will initially compete for customers in urban, commercial and residential zones where telecommunication infrastructure is already in place, some petitioners state their intention or right to compete on a state wide basis wherever competition is permitted.

However it is unclear at this time if all areas will be affected by the projects because many petitioners are not specific where they intend to compete in the long-run.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
, . .

An Initial Study was prepared to assess the projects' potential effects on the environment, and the respectiye significance of those effects. Based on the Initial Study, the CLCs' projects for competitive local exchange service have the potential to cause significant adverse effects' on the environment in the area of Land Use and Planning, Geological Resources, Water, Air Quality, Transportation and Circulation, Hazards, Noise, Public Services, Aesthetic and Cultural Resources, The projects will have less than a significant effect in other resource areas of the checklist. It should be noted that Findings 2 through 10 are for those projects which require work within existing utility rights-of-way for the purpose of modifying existing facilities or installing new facilities. Finding 1 is applicable for work outside of the existing utility rights-of- way.

In response to the Initial Study, the following specific measures should be incorporated into the projects to assure that they will not have any significant adverse effects on the environment. (See Public Resources.Code Section 21064.5.)
As a general matter, many of the mitigation measmes rely on .compliance with local standards and the local ministerial permit process. Although local safety and aesthetic input is essential in minimizing the impact of the petitioner's construction, local jurisdictions cannot impose standards or permit requirements which would prevent petitioners from developing their service terntories, or otherwise interfere with the statewide interest in competitive telecommunication service. Therefore, the petitioners' required compliance with local permit requirements is subject to this limitation.

The findings of the draft Negative Declaration were modified in response to comments filed during the public comment period from Negative Declarations II and IV. Changes are marked by italics. .

1. The proposed projects could have potentially significant environmental effects for all environmental factors if a proposed project extends beyond the utility right-of-way into undisturbed areas or into other rights-of-way. ("Utility right-of-way" means any utility 4 right-of-way, .not limited to only telecommUnication utility right-of-way.) For the most part, the petitioners do not plan to conduct projects that are beyond the utility right-of- way. However, should this occur, the petitioner shall file a Petition to.Modify its Certificate for Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN). An appropriate environmental analysis of the impacts of these sit~ specific activities shall be done.

2. The proposed projects will not have any significant effects on Population and Housing, Biological Resources, Energy and Mineral Resources, and Recreation if the proposed projects remain within existing utility right-of-way. There are no potential environmen~ effects in these areas, or adequate measures are incorporated into the projects to assure that significant effects will not occur.

3. The proposed projects could have potentially significant environmental effects on Geological Resources because possible upgrades or installations to underground conduits may fnduce erosion due to excavation, grading and fil~. It is unclear as to how many times underground conduits may be accessed by the petitioners, but it is reasonable to assume that constant excavation by various providers could result in erosion in areas where soil containment is particularly unstable.
, In order to mitigate any potential effects on geological resources, the petitioners shall comply with all local design, construction and safety standards by obtaining all applicable ministerial pennits from the appropriate local agencies. In particular, erosion control plans shall be developed and implemented for areas identified as particularly unstable or susceptible to erosion. If more than one petitioner plans to excavate geologically sensitive areas, coordination of their plans shall be necessary to minimize the number and duration of disturbances.

4. The prop<?sed projects could have potentially significant environmental effects on Water Resources because possible upgrades or installation to underground conduits may be in close proximity to underground or surface water sources. While the anticipated construction will generally occur within existing utility rights-of-way, the projects have the potential to impact nearby water sources if heavy excavation is required as the method of access to the conduits.

In order to mitigate any potential effects on water resources, the petitioners shall comply with all local design, construction and safety standards. This will include consultation with all appropriate local, state and federal water resource agencies for projects that are in close proximity to water resources, underground or surface. The petitioners shall comply with all applicable local, state and foderal water resource regulations. Appropriate site specific mitigation plans shall be developed by the petitioners if the projects impact water quality, drainage, direction, flow or quantity. If there is more than one petitioner for a particular area that requires excavation, coordination plans shall be required to minimize the number and duration of disturbances.
5 5. The proposed projects could have potentially significant environmental effects on Air Quality because possible excavation efforts for underground conduits may result in vehicle emissions and airborne dust for the immediate areas of impact. This is espeCially foreseeable if more than one petitioner should attempt such work in the same locale.

While the impact will be temporary, the emissions and dUst could exceed air quality standards for the area.

The petitioners shall develop and implement appropriate dust control measures during excavation as recommended by the applicable air quality management district. The petitioners shall comply with all applicable air quality standards as established by the affected air quality management districts. If there is more than one petitioner for a particular area that requires excavation, coordination 'plans shall be required to minimize the number and duration of disturbances.

6. The proposed projects could have potentially significant environmental impacts on Transportation and Circulation and Public Services because uncoordinated efforts by the petitioners to install fiber optic cable could result in a cumulative impact of traffic congestion, insufficient parking and hazards or barriers for pedestrians. This is foreseeable if the competitors choo,se to compete in the same' locality and desire to install their own cables. If the selected area is particularly dense with heavy vehicular or pedestrian traffic, the impacts could be enormous without sufficient control and coordination. Uncoordinated efforts may also adversely impact the quality and longevity of public street maintenance because numerous excavation activity depreciates the life of the surface pavement. Impacts from trenching activity may occur in utility rights-ol-way that contain other Public Services such as irrigation water lines.

The petitioners2 shall coordinate their efforts to install fiber optic cables or additional conduits so that the number of encroachments to the utility rights-of-way are minimized.

These coordination efforts shall also include affected transportation and planning agencies to coordinate other projects unrelated to the petitioners' projects. For example, review of a planning agency IS Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to identify impacted street projects would be an ,expected pari a/the coordination effort by the petitioner.

Besides coordinating their efforts, the petitioners shall abide by all local construction, maintenance and safety standards (and state standards, if applicable) by acquiring the necessary ministerial permits from the appropriate local agency or CaITrans (if within a State right-ol-way). Examples of these permits are excavation, encroachment and building permits. Appropriate construction start and end times, and dates if appropriate. 2 The petitioners discussed in this Negative Declaration shall coordinate with !!!.CLCs including those listed in the first Negative Declaration adopted by the Commission (0.95-12-057) and all CLCs in future Negative Declarations.

CLCs covered in the first Negative Declaration shall likewise be expected coordinate with those CLCs listed in this, Negative Declaration or any subsequent one adopted by the Commission. 6 shall be employed to avoid peak traffic periods and to minimize disruption, especially if the petitioners' work encroaches upon transportation rights-of-way. Petitioners shall consult with local agencies on appropriate restoration of public service facilities that are 'damaged by the construction and shall be responsible for such restoration.

7. The proposed projects could have potentially significant hazard-related effects because uncoordinated construction efforts described above could potentially interfere with emergency response or evacuation plans. There is also potential for an increase in overhead lines and poles which carry hazard-related impacts.

The same mitigation plan as described in the previous section is applicable here as well, and shall be augmented by notice to and consUltation with emergency response or evacuation agencies if the proposed project interferes with routes used for emergencies or evacuations. The,coordination efforts shall include provisions so that emergency or evacuation plans are not hindered. If the projects result in an increase in overhead communication lines, the petitioner shall obtain the necessary ministerial permitsto erect the necessary poles to support the lines. The Commission shall include these facilities as part of its overhead line regular inspections so that the requirements of G.O. 9S are met.

8. The proposed projects could have potentially significant environmental effects on Noise because it is possible some projects may require excavation or trenching. Although the effect is likely to be short-term, existing levels of noise could be exceeded.

If the petitioner requires excavation, trenching or other heavy construction activities which would produce significant noise impacts, the petitioner shall abide by all applicable local noise standards and shall infonn surrounding property owners and occupants (particularly school districts, hospitals and the residential neighborhoods) of the day(s) when most construction noise would occur. Notice shall be given at least two weeks in advance of the construction.

9. The proposed projects could have potentially significant environmental effects on aesthetics because it is possible that additional lines on poles in utility rights-of-way could become excessive for a particular area Aesthetic impacts may also occur in utility rights-of-Way that are landscaped Moreover, there is potential for an increase in above grade utility service boxes or cabinets which also carry aesthetic impacts.

Local aesthetic concerns shall be addressed by the petitioners for all facilities that are above-ground, in particular all types of service boxes or cabinets. The local land use or planning agency shall be consulted by the petitioner so that any site-specific aesthetic impacts are assessed and properly mitigated. For example, this may include restoration of the landscaped utility rights-of-way.

10. The proposed projects could have potentially significant environmental effects on 7 cultural resources because situations involving additional trenching may result in disturbing known or unanticipated archaeological or historical resources.

The petitioners shall conduct appropriate data research for known cultural resources in the proposed project area, and avoid such resources in designing and constructing the project. Should cultural resources be encountered during construction, all earthmoving activity which would adversely impact such resources shall be halted or altered so as to avoid such impacts, until the petitioner retains the service of a qualified archaeologist who will do the appropriate examination and analysis. The archeologist shall consult with appropriate federal, state and local agencies concerned with cultural resources, so that any potential impacts upon cultural resources are assessed and properly avoided or mitigated. The archeologist shall, in coordination with agencies, develop a plan for avoiding or mitigating any potential impacts upon those resources encountered.

In summary, the Mitigation Measures recommended in this environmental detennination are:

A) All Environmental Facton: if a proposed project extends beyond the utility right-of- way into undisturbed areas or other right-of-way, the petitioner shall file a Petition to Modify its Certificate for Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN). ("Utility right-of- way" means any utility. right-of-way, not limited to only telecommunications utility right- of-way.) An appropriate enviroruriental analysis of the impacts of these site specific activities shall be done.

If the projects remain within the utility right-of-way, the following Mitigation Measures are 'recommended:

B) General Cumulative Impacts: in the event that more than one petitioner seeks modifications or additions to a particular locality, the petitioners shall coordinate their . .. plans with each other, and consult with affected local agencies so that any cumulative effects on the environment are minimized. These coordination efforts shall reduce the number and duration of disturbance to existing utility right-of-way. Regardless of the number of petitioners for a particular locality. the petitioner shall consult with. and abide by the standards established, by all applicable local agencies. Each petitioner shall file a quarterly report, one month prior to the beginning of each quarter. that summarizes the construction projects that.are anticipated for the coming quarter. The summary will contain a description of the type of construction and the location for each project so that the local planning agencies can adequately coordinate multiple projects if necessary. The reports will also contain a suMmary of the petiti~ner's compliance with all Mitigation Measures for the projects listed. The quarterly reports will be filed with the local planning agencies where the projects are expected to take place and the Commission's Telecommunications Division. The Commission filing will be in the fonn of an informational advice letter. Subsequent quarterly reports shall also summarize the status 8 of the projects listed in previous quarterly report, until they are completed.

C) Geological Resources: the petitioners shall comply with all local design construction and safety standards by obtaining all applicable ministerial permits from the appropriate local agencies including the development and approval of erosion control plans. These shall be developed and implemented for areas identified as particularly unstable or susceptible to erosion. If more than one petitioner plans to excavate sensitive areas, coordination of their plans shall be necessary to minimize the number of disturbances.

The petitioner's compliance with this Mitigation Measure shall be included in its quarterly report.

D) Water Resources: the petitioners shall consult with all appropriate local, state and federal water resource agencies. for projects that are in close proximity to water resources, underground or surface. The petitioners shal'l comply with all applicable local, state and federal water resource regulations including the development of site-specific mitigation pl~ should the projects impact water quality, drainage, direction, flow or quantity. If there is more than one petitioner for a particular area that requires excavation, coordination plans shall be required to minimize the number of disturbances. The petitioner's compliance with this Mitigation Measure shall be included in its quarterly report.

E) Air Quality: the petitioners shall develop and implement appropriate dust control measures during excavation as recommended by the applicable air quality management district. The petitioners shall comply with all applicable air quality standards as established by the affected air quality management districts. If there is more than one petitioner for a particular area that requires excavation, coordination plans shall be required to minimize the number of disturbances. The petitioner's compliance with this Mitigation Measure shall be included in its quarterly report.

F) T.ransportation and Circulation and Public Services: the petitioners3 shall coordinate their efforts to install fiber optic cables or additional conduits so that the number of disturbances to the utility rights-of-way are minimized. These coordination ,efforts shall include affected transportation and plaruiing agencies to coordinate other projects unrelated to the petitioners' projects. For example, review of a planning agency's Capital Improvement Plan. (CIP) to identify impacted street projects would be an expected part of the coordination effort by the petitioner. Besides coordinating their efforts, the petitioners shall abide by all local construction, maintenance and safety standards (and state standards, if applicable) by acquiring the necessary ministerial permits from the appropriate local agency and/or CalTrans (if within Slate right-oj-way).

Examples of these pennits are excavation, encroachment and building permits.

Appropriate construction start and end times. and dates if appropriate, shall be employed 3 See Footnote #2.
9 to avoid peak traffic periods, especially if the petitioners' work encroaches upon transportation rights-of-way. Notice to the affected area (surrounding property owners and occupants) shall be given at least two weeks in advance of the construction. The notice will provide the time and dates of the proposed construction and discussion of potential impacts on traffic and circulation. Petitioners shall consult with local agencies on appropriate restoration of public service facilities that are damaged by the construction and shall be responsible for such restoration. The notice required for Mitigation Measures F and H shall be consolidated. The petitioner's compliance with this Mitigation Measure shall be included in its quarte~ly repo~.

G) Hazards: the petitioners shall use the Transportation and Circulation mitigation measure and augment it by informing and consulting with emergency response or evacuation agencies if the proposed project iriterfereswith routes used for emergencies or evacuations. The coordination effort shall include provisions so that emergency or t:vacuation plans are not hindered. If the projects result in an increase in overhead communication lines, the petitioner shall obtain the necessary ministerial pennits 'to erect the' necessary poles to support the lines. The Commission shall include these facilities as part of its overhead line regular inspections so that the requirements of G.O. 9S are met.

The petitioner's compliance with this Mitigation Measure shall be included in its quarterly report.

H) Noise: the petitioner shall abide by all applicable local noise standards and shall infonn surrounding property owners and occupants, particularly school districts, hospitals . and the residential neighborhoods, of the day(s) when most construction noise would occur if the petitioner plans excavation, trenching or other heavy construction activities which would cause any significant noise. Notice shall be given at least two weeks in . advance of the construction. The notice required for Miti"gation Measures F and H shall be consolidated. The petitioner's compliance with this Mitigation Measure shall be included in its quarterly report.

I) Aesthetics: All applicable local aesthetic standards will be addressed by the petitioners for all facilities that are above-ground, in particular all types of service boxes or cabinets.

The local land use agency shall be consulted by the petitioner 30 that any site-specific aesthetic impacts are assessed and properly mitigated by the petitioner. For example, this may include restoration of the landscaped utility rights-of-way. Petitioner's compliance with this Mitigation Measure shall be included in its quarterly report.

J) Cultural Resources: The petitioners shall conduct appropriate data researchfor Icnown cultural resources in the proposed project area, and avoid such resources in designing and constructing the project. Should cultural resources be encountered during construction, all earthmoving activity which would adversely impact such resources shall be halted or altered until the petitioner retains the service of a qualified archaeologist who will do the appropriate examination and analysis. The archaeologist will provide 10 proposals for any procedures to mitigate the impact upon those resources encountered.

The treatment plan will be designed through coordination with the appropriate federal, state and local agenci!=s. The petitioner's compliance with this Mitigation Measure shall be included in its quarterly report.

General Statement/or all Mitigation Measures:

Although local safety and aesthetic input is essential in minimizing the impact of the petitioner's construction, local jurisdictions cannot impose standards or permit requirements which would prevent petitioners from developing their service territories, or otherwise interfere with the statewide interest in competitive telecommunication service. Therefore, the petitioners' required compliance with local permit requirements is subject to this limitation.

With the implementation of the mitigation measures listed in A) - 1) above, the Commission should conclude that the proposed projects will not have one or more potentially significant environmental effects. The Commission should also adopt a Mitigation Monitoring Plan which will ensure that the Mitigation Measures listed above will be followed and implemented. The Mitigation Monitoring Plan is included wim this Negative Declaration as Appendix C. ~~~::g~r !V.U~G~
Analysis Branch
Energy Division
4·2,7·1~
Date
11 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:

The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [XI Land Use and Planning
o Population and Housing
[XI Geological Problems
[g) Water
[XI Air Quality
[XI Transportation/Circulation
CJ Biological Resources
CJ Energy and Mineral Resources
(KJ Hazards
(KJ Noise
mJ Mandatory Findings of
Significance
!Xl Public Services
IXl Utilities and Service
Systems
[iJ Aesthetics
IXl Cultural Resources
Cl Recreation
Note: For COnstructiOD ODtside of the utility rights-of-way, potential environmental impacts are too variable and uncertain to be specifically evaluated in this Initial Study, but are addressed in Environmental Determination 1 and Mitiga~ion Measure (A) in the Negative Declaration.

Determination:

On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed projects COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DEC LARA TION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be·a significant effect in this case be- cause the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the projects. A NEGATIVE DEC LARA TION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed projects MA Y have a signifi~t effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed projects MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentialty significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

CJ
[J
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR. including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
--ru ~.
. Signature Fit' N - ~o.l~ ~
"llylie Walsh
Pranted Name
4- 2 7-77
Date
Program Manager
Analysis Branch
Energy Division .

California Public Utilities Commission
2 o
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans
or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinit)'~
d) Affect agricultural resourCes or operations
(e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or iinpacts
from incompatible land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of
an established community (including a low-
income or minority community)?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0·
[J
Cl
Cl
o
Potentially
Significant
Unless Less Than
Mitigation Significant No
Incorporated Impact Impact
o o
[J [J
o o
Cl Cl
Cl [J
The proposed projects are not anticipated to·have any significant impacts on general or environmental plans. zoning, existing land usage, or agricultural resources. The projects are essentially modifications to existing facilities within established utility rights-of-way. Since these rights-of-way are already designed to be in compliance with zoning and land use plans, disruption of such plans are not foreseeable. In the event that the petitioners need to CO(lstruct facilities that extend beyond the rights-of-way, see Mitigation Measure A in the Negative Declaration.

II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or
local population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in
an undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
c
o
Cl
Cl o
CJ
o CJ
The proposed projects will not have impacts upon population or housing. The purpose of the projects is to 3 introduce competition into the local telephone service market. Since competition will be generally statewide and not centered in one locale, it is not anticipated that the projects will have an effect on population projections or housing availability of any particular area. The areas that will not initially receive the competition are rural, less populated areas; it cannot be seen that the initial lack of competitive services in these areas will result in significant movements of people to areas where competition will be heavy.

III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose ,people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture?
b) Seismic ground shaking?
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e) Landslides or mudflows?
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable
soil conditions from excavation, grading, or
fill?
g) Subsidence of land?
h) Expansive soils?
i) Unique geologic or physical features?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0 0
0 0
[J
[J
0 0
0 Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
0 0
0 [J
IX)
.mJ
CJ
CJ
[J
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
0 [8]
0 [&]
0 [&J
0 [&]
[J [J
Cl Cl
0 (8]
0 IXI
0 IX)
The projects will be constructed within existing utility facilities or established t."tility rights-of -way and will therefore not expose people to new risks for any of these impacts, except possibly erosion. Should additional cable facilities require the installation of new or upgraded conduits, trenching, excavation, grading and fill could be required. For appropriate mitigation, see Mitigation Measures (B) and (C) for details in the Negative Declaration.

IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding?
4 o o o
o o o
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)? 0 . [XI 0· 0
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
. water body? 0 0 0
e) Changes in currents, or the course· or direction
of water movements? 0 0 0
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withd.rawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? 0 [g) CJ 0
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? 0 [g) 0· 0 h) Impacts to groundwater quality? . 0 [g) 0 0-
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies? 0 0 0
The projects will involve alterations to existing telecommunication facilities (underground conduits or overhead poles) but could expose additional risks if more than one petitioner decide to compete in the same locality. Efforts to install cables, or if necessary, new conduits, in utility rights-of-way that are in close proximity to an underground or surface water sources could carry significant effects for quality. flow, quantity, direction or drainage if done improperly and without coordination. See Mitigation Measures (B) and (D) in the Negative Declaration for details.

V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
to an existing or projected air quality violation? o CJ o b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? o CJ o
5 ----- ----- -------------------------------------------- ..

Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? [J [J [J IXJ
d) Create objectionable odors? [J Cl [J [XJ
I f the projects do not require excavation or trenching of underground conduits, they wi II not have an effect upon· air quality, movement, temperature or climate. However, should the projects require such work and, if more.than one Petitioner decide to work in the same locale, there is pott.'!·,tial for an increase in dust in the immediate area.

See Mitigation Measures (8) and (E) in the Negative Declaration for details.

VI. TRANSPORTA TION/CIRCULATION.

Would the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.
sharp c.urves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g. fann equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site ·or off-site?
,.
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
f) Conflicts with adopted pol icies supporting
alternative transponation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
[J
[J
Cl
[J
Cl
CJ
[J
[J Cl
[J Cl
[J o
[J Cl
Cl o
Cl [J
[J Cl
The petitioners plan to mcdify existing utility conduits or poles within existing utility rights-of-way initially in urban, commercial zones and residential areas. Modification of these facilities by a single party does not present significant impacts upon traffic or circulation since the installation process is not expected to be lengthy.

However, if more than one of the petitioners decide to compete in the same locality, their efforts to install their own cables will have a significant cumulative effect on circ~i:!tion, especially in dense, urban commercial areas.

As a result, increases in traffic congestion, insufficient pari(Jng, and hazards or barriers for pedestrian are possible. See Mitigation Measures (8) and (F) in the Negative Declaration for details. 6 Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.

Would the proposal result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, an imals, and birds)? 0 Cl Cl (gJ
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? 0 Cl Cl IXl c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? Cl Cl Cl
d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal
pool)? Cl Cl Cl CD
e) Wil~life dispersal or migration corridors? 0 Cl 0 (gJ The projects will not affect any biological resources since all anticipated work will occur within existing utility facilities or established utility rights-of -way. Established utility rights-of-way are assumed to be outside of locally d~signated natural communities, habitats or migration corridors.

VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.

Would the proposal result in:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? 0 Cl Cl CD b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? 0 Cl Cl IXl
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the
region and the residents of the State? 0 Cl Cl CD
The projects will no impact upon mineral resources or the use of energy. The projects provide competitive telecommunication services that have no direct relationship to efficient energy use or mineral resources. The installation of additional fiber optic cables are within existing facilities or rights"of-way that are assumed to have adequate mitigation designs to avoid impacts on any mineral resources within proximity. 7 Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact I ncoi"porated Impact Impact
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil~ pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? [J [J [J
b) Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or.emergency evacuation plan? 0 mJ 0 0
c) . The creation of any health hazard or ·potential
health hazard? 0 [J [J
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? [J [J 0 [iJ
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? [J [J 0 [XJ
The installation of fiber optic cables can be a quick, clean and simple procedure with little use of heavy machinery. However there may be situations where excavation and trenching of underground conduits is necessary if the conduits are not easily accessible. Should this occur, uncoordinated efforts by the.petitioners in one concentrated area could potentially affect emergency response or evacuation plans for that locale. See Mitigation Measures (8) and (0) in the Negative. Declaration for details. Once the project is completed. the additional cables do not represent any additional hazards to people nor do they increase the possibility of tires.

X .. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? [J o CJ
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? [J [J o
The anticipated projects can be a quick and simple procedure, but in some cases could require heavy machinery or construction activity such as excavation, trenching, grading and refill. There is also the possibility that uncoordinated efforts by the petitioners in one locale could increase existing noise levels, if their activities involve the construction described. See Mitigation Measures (B) and (H) in the Negative Declaration for details. 8 XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
~ffect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
c) ·Schools?
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e) Other government services?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0 0
0 0
0 Potentially
Significant
Unless Less Than
Mitigation Significant No
Incorporated Impact Impact
0 0 ~
0 0 ~
0 CJ aD
IXJ CJ 0
[J CJ IX]
The proposed projects will increase competition in the local telephone service. The construction as~ciated with the projects have potential impacts on the maintenance of public streets and roads. Numerous disturbances·to the street surfaces depreciates the quality and longevity of the pavement. Trenching projects may alsO impact oth~r uisting public service facilities (e.g. irrigation lines) in the utility rights-of-way. Mitigation Measure F addresses thIS impact. .

XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
b) Communication systems?
c) Local or regional water treatment or
distribution facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
e) Storm water drainage?
f) Solid waste disposal?
g) Local or regional water supplies?
[J
o
o
o
o
o
o
[J
o o
D· o
o o
o o
o o
o CJ
The proposed projects could substantially alter communication systems in the event that existing facilities are unable to accommodate all of the participants in the market. If this should occur, additional conduits or poles for telecommunication equipment will need to be inserted in existing utility rights-of-way or the petitioners may seek entry to other rights-of-way. If the petitioners are forced to construct outside of the existing utility rights-of-way, 9 Mitigation Measure A is applicable. For work within the rights-of-way, see Mitigation Measure 8 in the Negative Dec laration.

Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? 0 [Xl Cl Cl b) Have a demonstrated negative aesthetic effect? 0 [X] 0 Cl c) Create light or glare? CJ 0 0 [XJ
The proposed p~ojects will occur within utility rights of way that will be either be undergrounded or ~n existing poles. Undergrounded facilities will have no demonstrated negative aesthetic effects. However, landscaped UlililY righls-of-way may be impacled by lrenching activilies. Additional lines on the poles may be a concern, but the proposed cables are not easily discernible and will unlikely have a negative impact. The only scenario where an aesthetic effect can occur is if the number of competitors for a particular area become so heavy that the cables on the poles become excessive. . There is potential for an increase in service boxes if the boxes cannot be installed within buildings or underground. Should this occur, the petitioners should follow Mitigation Measures (8) and (I) as described in the Negative Declaration.

XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources?
b) Disturb archaeologiCal resources?
c) Affect historical resources?
d) Have potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area?
[J
[J
[J
[J
[J
Cl Cl
o o
o o
o o
o Cl
The projects will involve existing utility facilities or established rights-of -way that are assumed to be clear from any paleontological, historical or archaeological resources. However, some projects may require excavation or trenching of utility rights-of-way, or outside the rights-of-way. If known or unanticipated cultural resources are encountered during such work, then the Mitigation Measures (8) and (J) should be followed. See Negative Declaration for details.
10 •
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase.the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Cl
Cl
Potentially
Significant
Unless Less Than
Mitigation Significant No
Incorporated Impact Impact
Cl Cl
Cl Cl
The projects will have no impact ,on recreational facilities or opportunities since these resources have no direction relationship to increased competition in local telephone serv.ices.

XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species. cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of Cali fomi a
history or prehistory? Cl [J [J
b) Does the project hllve the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
envir~>nment81 goals? Cl Cl Cl
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probably future
projects.) Cl Cl 0
d) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings. either directly or indirectly? Cl Cl Cl
11 T~FLEPnUNt:

AppenC1X A
··t:XCHANGE AREAS

CA-LJFORNJA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
~r-
-.... ,
i
~
i" , LEC!NO
'ACFIC~,",
an CAl.JIOIIIIU ICTl
CCHTIL OF CAL.I'ORNA ICTl
oneill! ~..c:lHE COW'.uuES
U~L!D ~JII"rTOAT
N\lWHA ~ A1'E.\ IOUHCAAI!S IN'A, -MEA COO£S"

I,ATAIOUNOAAIES
'ALIII I'II.IIGI ..... IIIT A_ ...

ClCUH'T'r L .... ES
CCUNTY NAoWES
~ Y ." c:.coADINAT'E IHn:ASEC'TlONS
--_01'_ .... ----- ---- -- -- ----
... c.-.. ... __ .. ,_ ... __ _
- --- --- ---- --- - -- --- -- - ------ -- -..... ~~ .. ---.... ...---.-..~ -- --....... ~-.. ... -~-... .............. --- ----...- ........ -----....... _- -i
-.-
J-~ __ -.../'1 ..
---::r;, s
-r-.... .
1--:
--_ ...
..:::. ............... 4IIa 0:1
-- ----~..=.-- 1,·1
--............... ,. R - --= ........ -- '=', ... -~----- -.... .--- ---. ____ • I ~==:~ H"I
== "1 --........ .....--~~ 1.,1
~ ~ ---.......-_ ... " ,01
i I
n "" ~.- W
=~-: , --_. --------_. -
---'-===- 1 I
a~· t:i = l! ~I'
§=:R
.... , I
I ... ::.-; I
:=,n ._- ....
~~
I I
R
Ii
8 I I
..,.j

I I ,-LJ
~
1 I ' ... ; I
q
-....;
lJ :,.J

AppendixC
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Competitive Local Carrien (CLCs)
Projects for Local Exchange Telecommunication Service throughout California Introduction:

The purpose of this section is to describe the mitigation moni.toring process for the CLCs' proposed projects and to describe the roles and responsibilities of government agencies in implementing and enforcing the selected mitigation measures.

California Public Utilities Commission (Commission):

The Public Utilities Code confers authority upon the Commission to regulate the terms of service and safety, practices and equipmeilt of utilities subject to its jurisdiction. It is the standard practice of the Commission to require that mitigation measmes stipulated as conditions of approval be implemented properly, monitored, and reported on. Section 21081.6 of the Public Utilities Code requires a public agency to adopt a reporting and monitoring program when it approves a project that is subject to the adoption of a mitigated negative declaration.

The purpose of a reporting and monitoring program is to ensure that measures adopted to mitigate or avoid significant environmental impacts are implemented. The Commission views the reporting and monitoring program as a working guide to facilitate not only the implementation of mitigation measures by the project proponents, but also the monitoring, compliance and reporting activities of the Commission and any monitors it may designate.

The Commission will address its responsibility under Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 when it takes action on the CLCs' petitions to provide local exchange telephone service. If the Commission adopts the Negative Declaration and approves the petitions, it will also adopt this Mitigation Monitoring Plan as an attachment to the Negative Declaration.

Project Description:

The Commission has authorized various companies to provide local exchange telephone service in competition with Pacific Bell, GTE California, Roseville Telephone Company and Citizens Telephone Company of California. The .current petitioners notified the Commission of their intent to compete in the territories throughout California, all of which are facilities-based services meaning that they propose to use their own facilities to provide service.

Step 1: Disputes and complaints (including those of the public) shaH be directed first to the Commission's designated Project Manager for resolution. The Project Manager will attempt to resolve the dispute.

Step 2: Should this infonnal process fail, the Commission Project Manager may initiate enforcement or compliance action to address deviation from the proposed project or adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program.

Step. 3: If a dispute or complaint regarding the implementation or evaluation of the Mitigation Monitoring Program or the Mitigation Measures cannot be resolved infonnally or through enforcement or compliance action ~y the Commission, any affected participant in the dispute or complaint may file a written "notice of dIspute" with the Commission's Executive Director. This notice shall be filed in, order to, resolve the dispute in a timely ~er, with copies concWTently served on other affected participants. Within 10 days ofreceipi, the Executive Director or designee(s) shall meet or confer with the filer and other affected participants for purposes of resolvmg the dispute. The Executive Director shall issue an Executive Resolution 4escribing his decisilln, and serve it on the filer and the other participants.

Partie'~; may also seek review by the Commission through existing procedures specified in the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, although a good faith effort should first be made to use the foregoing procedure.

Mitigation Monitoring Program:

1. As discussed in Mitigation Measure B, the petitioners shall file a' quarterly report which summarizes those projects which they intend to construct for the coming quarter. The report will contain a description of the project and its location, and a summary of the petitioner's compliance with the Mitigation Measures described in the Negative Declaration. The purpose of the report is to infonn the local agencies of future projects so that coordination of projects among petitioners in the saine locality can be done. The quarterly report shall be filed with the appropriate planning agency of the locality where the project(s) will occur. The report shall also be filed as an infonnational advice letter with the Commission's Telecommunications Division so that petitioner compliance with the Mitigation Measures are monitored ..

In order to ensure that the Mitigation Measures are fulfilled, the Commission will make periodic reviews of the projects listed in quarterly reports. The projects will be generally chosen at random, although the Commission will review any project at its discretion. The reviews will follow-up with the local jurisdictions so that all applicable Mitigation Measures are addressed. 3 If any project is expected to go beyond the existing utility rights-of-way, that project will require a separate petition to modify the CPCN. The petitioner shall file the petition with the Commission and shall also inform the affected local agencies in writing. The local agencies are also responsible for informing the Commission of any project listed in the quarterly reports which may potentially go out of the existing utility right-of-way. As discussed in Mitigation Measure A, a complete environmental review of the project will be triggered under CEQA, with the Commission as the lead agency.

2. In the event that the petitioner and the local agency do not agree if a project resuits in work outside of the utility rights-of-way, the Commission will review the project and make the final determination. See Dispute Resolution Process discussed above.

3. For projeCts that are in the u,tility rights-of-way, the petitioners shall abide by all applicable local standards as discussed in the Mitigation Measures. If a petitioner fails to comply with local regulatory standards by either neglecting to obtain the necessary permits, or by neglecting to follow the conditions of the permits, the local agency shall notify the Commission and Dispute Resolution Process begins ..

4. The Commission is the final arbiter for all unresolvable disputes between the local agencies and the petitioners. If the Commission finds that the petitioner has not complied with the Mitigation Measures in the Negative Declaration, it may halt and terminate the project. 4 Since many of the facilities-based petitioners are initially targeting local telephone service for areas where their telecommunications infrastructure is already established, very' little construction is envisioned. However, there will be occasion where the petitioners wil1 need to install fiber optic cable within existing utility underground conduits or attach cables to overhead lines. There is the possibility that existing utility conduits or poles will be unable to accommodate all the planned facilities, thereby forcing some petitioners to ,build or extend additional conduits into other rights-of-way, or into undisturbed areas. For more details on the project des'cription please see Project Description in the Negative Declaration.

Roles and Responsibilities:

As the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Commission is required to monitor this project to ensure that the required mitigation measures are implemented.

The Commission will be responsible for ensuring full compliance with the provisions of this monitoring program and has primary responsibility for implementation of the monitoring program. The purpose ,of this monitoring program is to document that the mitigation measures required by the Commission are implemented and that mitigated environmental impacts are reduced to insignificance or avoided outrigllt.

Because of the geographic extent of the proposed projects, the Commission may delegate duties and responsibilities fot: monitoring to other environmental monitors or consultants as deemed necessary. For specific enforcement responsibilities of each mitigation measure, please refer to the Mitigation Monitoring Table attached to this plan.

The Commission has the ultimate authority to halt any construction, operation, or maintenance activity associated with the CLC's local telephone service projects if the activity is determined to . be a deviation from the approved project or adopted mitigation measures. For details refer to the mitigation monitoring plan discussed below. '
Mitigation Monitoring Table:
'The table attached to this plan presents a compilation of the Mitigation Measures in the Negative Declaration. The purpose of the table is to provide the monitoring agencies with a'single comprehensive list of mitigation measures, effectiveness criteria, the enforcing agencies, and timing.

Dispute Resolution Process:

The Mitigation Monitoring Plan is expected to reduce or eliminate many potential disputes.

However, in the event that a dispute occurs, the following procedure will be observed:
" . -
Mitigation Monitoring Table
beyond or outside of
of the elCisting
utility rlght-of·way
into undisturbed
areas.
pacts due to
multiple disturb-
ances to a par-
ticular area.

Potenllal erosion
due to excavation.
grading and fill.
on
resouces, underground
or surface due to exca-
valion or grading work.
file a
to modify its CPCN. An appropriate
environmentat study of the
project is done.
among
the petitioners and the affect-
ed local agencies so that
construction projects in the
same location can be com-
bined or simultaneous.
with all local design, construc-
lion and safety standards
through permit procesa. Erosion
conlrol plans for areas identified
as susceptible to erosion.
an appropriate water resource
agenctes for prpJecls in dose
proximity to water resouces
Appropriate mitigation plans shan
be developed and compliance to
all local and state water regu-
lations is required .
way is assessed
through an environ-
mental study.
of disturbances to a
particular area are
minimized.
areas is contained.
reellon and quantity
are averted.
local agencies.

Applicable state
. water resource
agencies.

Before
construcllon
Before and
contruction.
construction ..
. The CPUC is ultimately responsible for compliance with the mitigation measures listed in Ihis document, but shall defer the responsibility to federal, state and local agencies, unh:ss otherwise designated.
...
-tzj
Z
'='
0 ~
> "'\:S
"'\:S
tzj
2:
~
H
~
'='
-
Mitigation Monitoring Table
In overhead
poles and communication lines.

Service boxes or cabinets may
be a visual bllghl. landscaping
In utDlty rlghl-of-way may be
Impacted by trenching.
resources are encount·
ered during construcllon; resour·
ces are damaged or moved.

CPUC wiD Inspect the overhead
lines.
shall be complied with by the pet!
tloners.

Pelilloners shan nollce the
surrounding area of construe·
lions date. and limes.

I. All applicable aesthellc
standards win be mel by
petitioners for above-ground
facilities, especlaUy service
cabinets. Consult with local
agencies on proper restoration of
landscaping.

J.AUearthmovingthatwou~
Impact the resources shal
cease or be altered until the
petilloner retains the serv.iee
of an archaeologist who will
propose mltlgallon. Thorough re·
search done prior to construction to
resources.

Quarterly reports.

Quarterfy reports.

J
are Inspected and
maintained as safe.
lion Is kept to levels
that do not exceed
local standards.

Cabinets are placed
within existing build·
Ings, underground, or
In areas that are land·
scaped so that aesthe·
IIc Impacis are mlnlml·
zed. landscaping res·
tored to or Inal form.

Cultural resources that
are encountered are
not destroyed or ad·
veBely Impacted.
local agendes.
agendes
I.

I Local agencies.
local, state
andlor federal
agencies.
during
construction.

I Before
construcllon.

I Before and during
construction.

Before and during construcllon.

PROOF OF SERVICE BY HlUL
I , _----1--~-I-.l-; otM.~~L---:,~' _---, de c 1 a:-e·: ' I am over the age of 18 years, ·~ot a party to this
proc~eding, and am employed by the California Public utilities Commission at 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, California.

On 6/--W It/; . I depositec. in the mail at
Sa~ F:-ancisco, CaliforrITa:ta-/C of:
(DECISION ~ OR TYPE OF HEARING)
b/J/lf(/ J
(DATE OF HEARING)
IZ rr -<J ~ -0 ~ flZ. f -t -¢7}c,-0 If-Y
(APPLlCATION/CASE/OII/oiR NQXaER)
~~ a sealed envelope, with postage p:-epai6, a~~:-ess~d to the las:, k.:l0 ..... adci=esfJ of each o! the adc:-esse es :":1 the att~c~e::
l':'st.

I declare ~~de= penalty 0: pe:-j~~ that the fo:-ego:"~S a n9 ~ort#-t anc that ~his decla:-aticn was exec~tec o~ ________ ~~~~~~~~~----, at San F=ancisco, Ca~i:o~ia.
j ---rt
"sicno:l: re
9/92
f
R 95-04-043
I 95-04-044
DECISION: i J -0 6 -o-tJ
MAIL DATE: 'lyV/Ji
Copy of" OPINION" and order mailed to the following.

SEE ATTACHED LIST FOR APPEARANCES, STATE SERVICE
6/18/99
Iii
doc #15576 (rev. 3/4/98)
Count
CA-21
6/24/99
************ SERVICE LIST *************
Last updated on 18-JUN-1999 by: LIL
R9504043 LIST
I9504044
***************** APPEARANCES ***************** William Brown SUITE 14E06
Matthew C. Ames
WILLIAMS MALONE/WILLIAMS L. LOWERY
Attorney At Law·
1155 CONNECTICUT AVE., NW, STE. 1000
WASHINGTON DC 20036
(202) 785-0600
[email protected]
For: BO&MAI/IREM/NAA/NAREIT/NMHC
Randolph W. Deutsch
Attorney At Law
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
795 FOLSOM STREET, ROOM 690
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107
(415) 442-5560
[email protected]
Jerry Varcak
Vice President

BANK OF AMERICA
PO BOX 37000, DEPT 13892
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94137
(925) 675-1042
[email protected]
Jeffrey F. Beck

BECK & ACKERMAN
4 EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 760
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(415) 263-7300
[email protected]
Stephen P. Bowen
Attorney At Law

BLUMENFELD & COHEN
4 EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 1170
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(415) 394-7500
[email protected]
For: SpectraNet International
Walter C. Finch
Executive Vice President

BOMA CALIFORNIA
1000 BROADWAY, SUITE 355
OAKLAND CA 94607-4090
1100 PEACHTREE ST, NE
ATLANTA GA 30309-4599
For: bakersfield cellular
Debra L. Carlton
Vice President

CALIFORNIA APARTMENT ASSOCIATION
980 NINTH STREET, STE 2150
SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2741
(916) 447-7881
Darlene Clark
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN.

PO BOX 11080
OAKLAND CA 94611
(510) 428-2225
[email protected]
Jerome Candelaria
Attorney At Law

CALIFORNIA CABLE TV ASSOCIATION
4341 PIEDMONT AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR
OAKLAND CA 94611-4715
For: CCTA, AT&T,ICG,TCG San Francisco, TCG Los
Angeles, TCG San Diego
Carmela Castellano
1535 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
Joshua M. King
Senior Counsel

CELLULAR ONE/DIGITAL PCS
651 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 1500
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA 94080
(650) 827-5656
Jon Chambers
1850 M STREET, N.W. 11TH FLR.

WASHINGTON DC 20036
For: Sprint Telecommunications Venure
************ SERVICE LIST *************
Charles E. Born
Director, Regulatory Affairs

CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS
7901 FREEPORT BLVD., SUITE 200
SACRAMENTO CA 95832
(916) 665-5355
[email protected]
Barbara L. Snider
Attorney At Law

CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
7901 FREEPORT BLVD., SUITE 100
SACRAMENTO CA 95832
(916) 665-5335
[email protected]
Louise Renne

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
1390 MARKET ST., SUITE 250
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
For: City of LA/Sacramento/San Carlos/San Jose/
Santa Monica/San Mateo Cnty Tel Auth/City & Cnty
San
Robert D. Herrick
City Attorney

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
14177 FREDERICK STREET
MORENO VALLEY CA 92552-0805
(909) 413-3036
For: CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
Nick Rahe

CITY OF SANTA ANA
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA CA 92702
Traci Bone
JULIA M.C. FRIEDLANDER
Deputy City Attorney

CITY/COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
1390 MARKET ST., 5TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102-5408
(4l5) 554-4257
For: The City of LA/Sacramento/San Carlos/San
Jose/Santa Monica;San Mateo Co Telcom Auth;S.F.

City &
Terry Monroe
Vice President, State Affairs

COMPETITIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSN
1900 M STREET, N.W., SUITE 800
WASHINGTON DC 20036
(202) 296-6650
[email protected]
E. Garth Black
Attorney At Law

COOPER, WHITE & COOPER
201 CALIFORNIA ST., 17TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(4l5) 433-1900
[email protected]
Mark P. Schreiber
Attorney At Law

COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, LLP
201 CALIFORNIA STREET, 17TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(415) 433-1900
[email protected]
For: Roseville Telephone Company/Smaller
Independent LECs
Dhruv Khanna
Vice President, General Counsel

COVAD COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
2330 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY
SANTA CLARA CA 95050
(408) 490-4560
[email protected]
Carrington Phillip
COX CALIFORNIA TELCOM INC.
1400 LAKE HEARN DRIVE NE
ATLANTA GA 30319
Richard Smith
Director, State Regulatory Affairs

COX CALIFORNIA TELCOM, LLC
2200 POWELL STREET, SUITE 795
EMERYVILLE CA 94608-2618
(510) 923-6220
[email protected]
Karen L. Peterson
Attorney At Law

CROSBY HEAFEY ROACH & MAX
1999 HARRISON STREET, 26TH FLOOR
OAKLAND CA 94612
(510) 466-6855
[email protected]
Daniel M. Waggoner
DAVIS WRIGHT TERMAlNE
2600 CENTURY SQUARE
1501 FOURTH AVENUE
SEATTLE WA 98101-1688
************ SERVICE LIST *************
David J. Marchant
Attorney At Law

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, STE 600
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-3834
(415) 276-6568
[email protected]
For: Teleport Commun.Grp,Cable Plus,
Mark P. Trinchero
Attorney At Law

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
1300 SW 5TH AVENUE, SUITE 2300
PORTLAND OR 97201
For: ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE
Jones Day
555 W FIFTH ST SUITE 4600
LOS ANGELES CA 90013
Shelly Bergum
Executive Director

DEAF & DISABLED TELECOM PROGRAM
1939 HARRISON STREET, SUIT~ 520
OAKLAND CA 94612-3532
Virginia J. Taylor
Attorney At Law

DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
400 R STREET, SUITE 3090
SACRAMENTO CA 95814-6200
(916) 445-5126
Laura H. Phillips
Dml LOHNES & ALBERTSON
1:00 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVENUE, N.W.
~ASHINGTONDC 20036-6802
Penny H. Bewick
Government & Industry Affairs
ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE, INC.
4400 NE 77TH AVENUE, PO BOX 4678
VANCOUVER WA 98662-0678
(360) 896-3211
Hal Kluis
President

EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
4918 TAYLOR COURT
TURLOCK CA 95382-9599
Bill Tynes

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
131 ALBRIGHT WAY SUITE C
LOS GATOS CA 95030
Jerrey P. Gray
Attorney At Law
. GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI RITCHIE & DAY LLP
505 SANSOME STREET, STE 900
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(415) 392-7900
[email protected]
For: Mountain Celluar
John L. Clark
Attorney At Law

GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI RITCHIE & DAY LLP
505 SANSOME STREET, 9TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(415) 765-8443
[email protected]
For: HTC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Michael B. Day
Attorney At Law

GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI RITCHIE & DAY LLP
505 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 900
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-3133
(415) 392-7900
[email protected]
Peter W. Hanschen·
Attorney At Law

GRAHAM AND JAMES LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA, SUITE 300
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(415) 954-0258
[email protected]
Barry Pineles
Regulatory Counsel
GST TELECOM, INC.
4001 MAIN STREET
VANCOUVER WA 98663
(360) 906-7104
[email protected]
Susan Rossi

GTE OF CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED

LEGAL DEPARTMENT
ONE GTE PLACE, CA500LB
THOUSAND OAKS CA 91362-3811
(805) 372-6358
[email protected]
Schelly Jensen
Manager-Government Relations

GTE WIRELESS
12677 ALCOSTA BOULEVARD
SAN RAMON CA 94583-0811 '
(510) 904-3908
Bruce M. Holdridge
Director, Government Affairs
ICG TELECOM GROUP, INC.
180 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 1000
OAKLAND CA 94612
(510) 251-7033
K.S. Noller
Assistant General Manger

IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT
PO BOX 937
IMPERIAL CA 92251
Earl Nicholas Selby
Attorney At Law
************

LAW OFFICES OF EARL NICHOLAS SELBY
418 FLORENCE STREET
PALO ALTO CA 94301-1705
(650) 323-099'0
[email protected]
Kim Logue
Regulatory Analyst
LCI INTERNATIONAL TELECOM CORP.
4250 N. FAIRFAX DRIVE, 12W002
ARLINGTON VA 22203
(703) 363 -,4321
[email protected]
Terry J. Houlihan
Attorney At Law

MCCUTCHEN DOYLE BROWN & ENERSEN LLP
3 EMBARCADERO CENTER, 18TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(4l5) 393-2022
[email protected]
William C. Harrelson

ANTHONY DITIRRO
Attorney At Law

MCI WORLDCOM
201 SPEAR STREET, 9TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 228-1090
[email protected]
Woody Trayler

MCIMETRO
2250 LAKESIDE BLVD
RICHARDSON TX 75082
SERVICE LIST *************
Mary E. Wand
Attorney At Law

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 268-7201
[email protected]
Hojoon Hwang
Attorney At Law

MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 S. GRAND AVE., 35TH FLOOR
LOS ANGELES CA 90071-1560
(213) 683-9150
[email protected]
Burton Gross

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON, LLP
33 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET 19TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(4l5) 512-4024
[email protected]
Terry Murray

MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
227 PALM DRIVER
PIEDMONT CA 94610
Helen M. Mickiewicz
Legal Division
RM. 5123
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(4l5) 703-1319
[email protected]
Joseph R. Cocke

NORTH AMERICAN NUMBERING PLAN ADM
SUITE 349
2060-D AVENUE ARBOLES
THOUSAND OAKS CA 91362
Martin A. Mattes
Attorney At Law

NOSSAMAN GUTHNER KNOX & ELLIOTT, LLP
50 CALIFORNIA STREET, 34TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111,-4799
(4l5) 398-3600
[email protected]
Robert J. Gloistein
Attorney At Law

ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
400 SANSOME STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-3143
(4l5) 773-5900
[email protected]
************ SERVICE LIST *************
David Discher
ROBERT J. MAZIQUE
Attorney At Law

PACIFIC BELL
140 NEW MONTGOMERY ST, ROOM 1517
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(4l5) 542-7747
[email protected]
For: Pacific Bell
Ed Kolto Wininger
Attorney At Law

PACIFIC BELL
140 NEW MONTGOMERY ST., ROOM 1619
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(4l5) 545-9422
ed.kolto.wininger®pactel.com
Nicola Erbe
Attorney At Law

PACIFIC BELL
140 NEW MONTGOMERY ST., ROOM 1514
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 542'-7691
[email protected]
Louis E. Vincent
Attorney At Law

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
PO BOX 7442
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120
(4l5) 973-2981
For: Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Michelle L. Wilson
Attorney At Law

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
PO BOX 7442, LAW DEPT.

SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120
(415) 973-7467
For: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
Isabelle Salgado

PACIFIC TELESIS LEGAL GROUP
2600 CAMINO RAMON, ROOM 2W802
SAN RAMON CA 94583
Peter A. Casciato
Attorney At Law
PETER A. CASCIATO, A PROF. CORP.
8 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 701
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-4825
(415) 291-8661
[email protected]
For: ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORY PUBLISHERS'
Randall B. Lowe
PIPER & MARBURY, L.L.P.
1200 NINETEENTH STREET, NW
WASHINGTOM DC 20036
Cheryl Hills
Attorney At Law

PRIMA LEGAL SERVICES
2317 BROADWAY, SUITE 350
REDWOOD CITY CA 94063
(650) 261-0500
[email protected]
For: Cox California Telcom
Maria E. Andrade
PUBLIC ADVOCATES, INC.
1535 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103-2500
(4l5) 431-7430
[email protected]
Daniel Weaver

SAN FRANCISCO BEAUTIFUL
41 SUTTER STREET, SUITE 709
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104
Natalie D. Wales
Attorney At Law
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
1850 GATEWAY DRIVE, 7TH FLOOR
SAN MATEO CA 94404-2467
(650) 513-2732
[email protected]
Andrew Lipman

SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN, LLP
3000 K ST NW STE 300
WASHINGTON DC 20007
Peter J. Stapp
Vice President Of Regulatory Policy
TCI TELEPHONY SERVICES, INC.
5619 DTC PARKWAY
ENGLEWOOD CO 80111-3000
- ,
" ************ SERVICE LIST *************
Andrew O. Isar
Director, Industry Relations
TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESELLERS ASSN.
4312 92ND AVENUE, N.W.

GIG HARBOR WA 98335
(253) 265-3910
[email protected]
Deborah Waldbaum
r:AREN NOTSUND
kttorney At Law

TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP INC
1350 TREAT BOULEVARD, STE 500
~KLNUT CREEK CA 94596
~:=hael A. Morris
r~3ional Vice President
-:-::::"EPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP INC.
; ~~:;ULATORY AND EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
· ·:'0 TREAT BLVD.
•. =.:..NUT CREEK CA 94596
. : 0) 949-0600
- :[email protected]
~ :.-)mas Long
..• UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
-:~ VAN NESS AVE., STE 350
· ;~; FRANCISCO CA 94102
.;: 5) 929-8879
· . ong@turn . org
:"":::il o. Simpson, Jr.
~s ARMY LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY
?Ql NORTH STUART STREET, SUITE 713
KRLINGTON VA 22203-1837
(703) 696-1643
[email protected]
Susan Davis Morley
WIGGINS & VILLACORTA, P.A.
2145 DELTA BOULEVARD, STE 200
TALLAHASSEE FL 32302
(850) 385-6007
[email protected]
Michael J. Thompson
Attorney At Law

WRIGHT & TALISMAN, PC
1200 G STREET, N.W., STE 600
WASHINGTON DC 20005
(202) 393-1200
[email protected]
David A. Simpson
Attorney At Law

YOUNG VOGL HARLICK WILSON & SIMPSON LLP
425 CALIFORNIA ST., STE 2500
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104
(415) 291-1970
[email protected]
For: Western Fiber telecom, LLC
David M. Wilson
Attorney At Law

YOUNG VOGL HARLICK WILSON & SIMPSON LLP
425 CALIFORNIA STREET, STE 500
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104-2107
(415) 291-1970
*************** STATE SERVICE ****************
Joseph A. Abhulimen
Telecommunications Division
AREA 3-E
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCOCA 94102
(415) 703-1458
[email protected]
Natalie Billingsley
Office of Ratepayer Advocates
RM. 4101
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 703-1368
[email protected]
Mary Jo Borak
Telecommunications Division
AREA 3-D
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 703-1879
[email protected]
Danny Shields
Manager

CALTRANS RIGHTS-OF-WAY PROGRAMS
1120 N STREET, MS 37
SACRAMENTO CA 95814-5690
Tracey F. Pirie
Administrarive Analyst

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
PO BOX 1990
SANTA BARBARA CA 93102-1990
..

Jerry Jazmadarian
Telcommunications Manager

COUNTY OF PLACER
2809 SECOND STREET
AUBURN CA 95603
(530) 889-7735
Brian M. Chang
Office of Ratepayer Advocates
RM. 4205
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(4l5) 703-1333
[email protected]
Robert T. Feraru
Public Advisor Office
RM. 5303
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(4l5) 703-2074
[email protected]
Janice L. Grau
Legal Division
RM. 5023
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(4l5) 703-1960
[email protected]
Risa Hernandez
Telecommunications Division
AREA 3-D
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(4l5) 703-5331
[email protected]
Karen Jones
Telecommunications Division
AREA 3-D
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(4l5) 703-1955
[email protected]
Ira Kalinsky
Legal Division
RM. 5027-
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 703-2130
[email protected]
************ SERVICE LIST *************
Victoria S Kolakowski

ORA/CIB
Office of -Ratepayer Advocates
RM. 4102
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 703-2245
[email protected]
For: ROOM 4102, 3-2245
Jonathan Lakritz
Telecommunications Division
AREA 3-E
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 703-2117
[email protected]
Thomas Lew
Office of Ratepayer Advocates
RM. 4205
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 703-1784
[email protected]
Bill Neill
Private Citizen, Professional Engineer
PO BOX 33666
SAN DIEGO CA 92163-3666
(619) 231-1313
[email protected]
Barbara Ortega
Executive Division
RM. 5109
320 WEST 4TH STREET SUITE 500
LOS ANGELES CA 90013
(213) 576-7070
[email protected]
Dale Piiru
Office of Ratepayer Advocates
RM. 4101
505 VAN NESS AVE
_SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(4l5) 703-1726
[email protected]
Thomas R. Pulsifer
Administrative Law Judge Division
RM. 5005
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(4l5) 703-2386
[email protected]
************ SERVICE LIST *************
Jacqueline A. Reed
Administrative Law Judge Division
RM. 5117
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(4l5) 703-2935
[email protected]
Utilities And Communications Committee

SENATE ENERGY
STATE CAPITOL ROOM 408
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
Eleanor Yung Szeto
Telecommunications Division
AREA 3-D
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 703-2253
[email protected]
Leah A. Senitte
9-1-1 Program Mgr.

TELECOMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
601 SEQUOIA PACIFIC BLVD
SACRAMENTO CA 95814-0282
Allan G. Tolman
Departmentof General Services
TELEPHONE & NETWORK SVCS.
601 SEQUOIA PACIFIC BLVD.

SACRAMENTO CA 95814
Jensen Uchida
Telecommunications Division
AREA 3-D
505· VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(4l5) 703-5953
[email protected]
Lionel B. Wilson
Legal Division
RM. 5136
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 703-1642
[email protected]
************** INFORMATION ONLY ***************
Clifford G. Rudolph
President And Chief Exec. Officer
ADVANCED TELCOM GROUP, INC.
885 N. SAN ANTONIO ROAD, SUITE R
LOS ALTOS CA 94022
(650) 559-8900
Richard C. Nelson
Director - Regulatory
AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

ONE CALIFORNIA STREET, 28TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-5401
(415) 658-2059
Mark J. Angell

ANGELL & ASSOCIATES
1075 ROSEWOOD DRIVE
GRAPEVINE TX 76051
(817) 329-7424
For: Digital Telecommunications Services, LLC
Glenn Stover
Attorney At·Law

AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
795 FOLSOM STREET, ROOM 670
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107
(415) 442-5550
[email protected]
William A. Ettinger
Attorney At Law
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
795 FOLSOM STREET, ROOM 625
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107
(415) 442-2783
[email protected]
For: AT&T Communications of California, Inc.

Kurt Maass
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
5400 CARILLON POINT
KIRKLAND WA 98033
Mary Kruchten

BANK OF AMERICA
PO BOX 37000 DEPT 13411
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94137
M. Manuel Fishman
Attorney At Law

BARTKO ZANKEL TARRANT MILLER
900 FRONT STREET, STE 300
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(4l5) 956-1900
[email protected]
.- ************ SERVICE LIST *************
Char~es L. Best
Attorney At Law
1220 S. W. MORRISON ST., SUITE 8.05
PORTLAND OR 97205
Stephen P. Bowen
Attorney At Law

BLUMENFELD & COHEN
4 EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 1170
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(415) 394-7500
[email protected]
James E. Pickrell

BRAND X INTERNET
927 6TH STREET
SANTA MONICA CA 90403
(310) 395-5500
Milton J. Morris, Esq.

Attorney
BROOKS FIBER COMMUNICATIONS OF SAC.
10316 PLACER LANE
SACRAMENTO CA 95827
(916) 431-5105
For: Brooks Fiber Communications of Sacramento,
Inc.

Rachel J. Rothstein
Senior Regulatory Counsel
CABLE & WIRELESS, INC.
8219 LEESBURG PIKE
VIENNA VA 22182
(703) 734-4439
Jeff Kositsky

CAL/NEVA COMMUNITY ACTION
225 30TH ST STE 200
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
Traci Nutter

CALIFORNIA PAY PHONE ASSOCIATION
1866 CLAYTON ROAD, SUITE 213
CONCORD CA 94520
Jeffrey Elkins Ceo

CAL TECH INTERNATIONAL TELECOM
197 JOAQUIN CIRCLE
DACVILLE CA 94526
Douglas F. Carlson
POST OFFICE BOX 12574
BERKELEY CA 94712-3574
(510) 597-9995·
[email protected]
Heidi Sieck Williamson
Dept Of Telecommunications & Information

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
875 STEVENSON STREET, 5TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
(415) 554-0811
heidi [email protected]
Bremda Riddick
Director

CLEC IMPLEMENTATION
1250 BAYHILL DRIVE, STE 200
SANBRUNO CA 94066
(650) 794-2689
[email protected]
Michele Tennant

COLE RAYWID BRAVERMAN
1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., NW., SUITE 200
WASHINGTON DC 20006-3458
Nancy Biagini
Cwa Staff Representative

COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA
411 AIRPORT BOULEVARD
BURLINGAME CA 94010
(650) 348-7303
Ken Mceldowney
Executive Director

CONSUMER ACTION
717 MARKET STREET, SUITE 310
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
Thomas J. Burke

CONTEL SERVICE CORPORATION
#CA500 GCF

ONE GTE PLACE
THOUSAND OAKS CA 91362-3811
Bernard H. Chao
Esquire

COVAD COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
2330 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY
SANTA CLARA CA 95050
(408) 490-4367
[email protected]
Alexander V. Netchvolodoff
Vice President Of Public Policy
COX ENTERPRISES, INC.
1225 19TH STREET NW, STE 450
WASHINGTON DC 20036-2458
..;.
************ SERVICE LIST *************
Cherrie Conner
Telecommunications Division
AREA 3-D
505 VAN NESS AVE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(4l5) 703-2767
[email protected]
Joseph Faber
Attorney

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER
SUITE 600
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-3834
(4l5) 276-6500
For: New Telco, d/b/a Sprint Telecommunications
Venture
Juanita Harris

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/TELECOM TASK FORCE
ANTITRUST DIVISION NO.8104
1401 H STREET NW, STE 8000
WASHINGTON DC 20530
(202) 514-5642
For: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
David Carter

DIALINK CORPORATION
164 E. DANA STREET
MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94041-1508
(650) 691-9330
T.M. Eagan
Calif. Environmental & Resource Assc.

EAGAN & WARD
1024 10TH STREET, STE. 300
SACRAMENTO CA 95814-3514
Kevin P. Timpane
FIRST WORLD COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
878 ELIZABETH STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94114
Esther H. Rosenthal
Regulatory Counsel

FIRSTWORLD COMMUNICATIONS
9333 GENESEE AVENUE, SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO CA 92121
(615) 552-8010
Gwen Moore

GEM COMMUNICATIONS
4201 WILSHIRE BLVD., STE 300
LOS ANGELES CA 90010
Regina Deangelis
Attorney At Law

GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI RITCHIE & DAY LLP
505 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 900
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(4l5) 392-7900
For: Preferred Long Distance, Inc.

Regina M. Deangelis
Attorney At Law

GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI RITCHIE & DAY LLP
505 SANSOME STREET, STE 900
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(4l5) 392-7900
Michael Gersick

GRATTAN GERSICK KARP MILLER
980 9TH STREET, 16TH FLOOR
SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2719
Gary Yaquinto
Vice President, Government Affairs
GST TELECOM INC.
1201 S. ALMA SCHOOL ROAD, STE 2000
MESA AZ 85210
Ken Snow
Director-Government Affairs
GST TELECOM, INC.
1340 TREAT BLVD., SUITE 100
WALNUT CREEK CA 94596
Margo Friedrich
Regulatory Affairs

GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
711 VAN NESS AVE., STE 300
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
[email protected]
Helen Hall

GTE CARD SERVICES INCOPORATED
5221 N. O'CONNOR BLVD., 13TH FLOOR
IRVING TX 75039
Gordon Allen

GTE CARD SERVICES INCORPORATED
1200 WALNUT HILL LANE, STE 2600
IRVING TX 75038
Brenda J. Boykin

LOUIS GURMAN
************

GURMAN , BLASK & FREEDMAN, CHARTERED
1400 SIXTEENTH STREET, N.W., SUITE 500
WASHINGTON DC 20036
(202) 328-8200
For: Commco Tec Corporation
Leslie S. Spahnn
HElM NOACK KELLY & SPAHNN
1121 L STREET, SUITE 100
SAXRAMENTO CA 95814
Linda L. Oliver

HOGAN & HARTSON
555 THIRTEENTH STREET, N.W.

WASHINGTON DC 20004-1109
(202) 637-5600
[email protected]~
Allan C. Hubbard, Esq.

Regulatory Counsel
POST OFFICE BOX 10804
300 WEST SERVICE ROAD
CHANTILLY VA 20153
(703) 478-5772
For: Access Network Services, Inc.

Jack Burk
President
INTEGRATED TELESERVICES, INC.
7108 N. FRESNO STREET, SUITE 300
FRESNO CA 93720
Richard C. Hall

INTEL CORPORATION
1900 PRAIRIE CITY RD, Mis FM4-125
FOLSOM CA 95630-9598
Lance Sentman
International Research Analyst
INTERNATIONAL TELCOM, LTD.
417 SECOND AVENUE WEST
SEATTLE WA 98119
(206) 479-2899
For: INTERNATIONAL TELCOM, LTD.

Edward ·W. O'Neill
Attorney At Law

JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO LLP
ONE SANSOME STREET, 12TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104
(4l5) 392-8080
[email protected]
SERVICE LIST *************
Jonathan E. Canis
Attorney

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN
1200 19TH STREET, N.W., SUITE 500
WASHINGTON DC 20036
(202) 955-9600
For: Intermedia Communications, Inc.

Ross A. Buntrock
BRAD E. MUTSCHELKNAUS

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP
1200 19TH STREET, FIFTH FLOOR
WASHINGTON DC 20036
(202) 955-9600
For: ACSI Local Switched Services, Inc. dba
e.spire
David Klein

KLEIN ZELMAN ROTHERMEL & DICHTER, LLP
485 MADISON AVENUE
NEW YORK NY 10022
(212) 935-6020
For: Eagle Communications of California , LLC
Scott M. Johnson
Attorney At Law
LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT M. JOHNSON
21312 FOREST MEADOW
EL TORO CA 92630-5813
(949) 855-6358
For: Brand X Internet
David A. Jones

LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
1400 K STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
Thomas Mcdonald
Attorney

LEBOEUF LAMB GREENE & MACRAE

ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(4l5) 951-1100
For: MCI Metro Access Transmission Services, I
Jacqueline R. Kinney
Attorney At Law

LEGAL AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
2788 LAND PARK DRIVE
SACRAMENTO CA 95818
************ SERVICE LIST *************
Terrence J. Ferguson
Senior Vice President & General Counsel
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
3555 FARNAM STREET
OMAHA NE 68131
(402) 536-3624
General Counsel
LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO.
17785 CENTER COURT DRIVE
NORTH CERRITOS CA 90703-8575
Mark Brown
Senior Attorney.

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
201 SPEAR STREET, 9TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(4l5) 978-1292
Kent Heyman, Esq.

Vice President & General Counsel
MGC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
3165 PALMS CENTRE DRIVE
LAS VEGAS NV 89103
(702) 310-1000
Marilyn H. Ash
Associate Legal Counsel
MGC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
3301 N. BUFFALO DRIVE
LAS VEGAS NV 89129
(702) 310-8461
[email protected]
Rocky N. Unruh
Judith A. Holiber

MORGENSTEIN &JUBELIRER LLP

ONE MARKET PLAZA
For: MCI Metro Access Transmission Services, Inc. SPEAR STREET TOWER, 32ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
Denise V. Thomas

MCI WORLDCOM
2678 BISHOP DRIVE, STE 200
SAN RAMON CA 94583
Nikayla Nail
Attorney At Law

MCI WORLD COM
201 SPEAR STREET, 9TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 228-1150
[email protected]
Mark E Brown
JOHN A. GUTTIEREZ

MEDIAONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF CALIF, INC
1999 HARRISON STREET, STE 660
OAKLAND CA 94612-3517
Lonn L. Beedy

METRO ONE COMMUNICATIONS
8405 S W NIMBUS AVENUE
BEAVERTON OR 97008
Francis F. Chin
General Counsel

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
JOSEPH P. BORT METRO CENTER
101 EIGHTH STREET
OAKLAND CA 94607-4700
(510) 464-7710
(415) 896-0666
Lorrie Bernstein

MOSS ADAMS
1899 WEST MARCH LANE, SUITE F
STOCKTON CA 95207-6422
(209) 957-5851
Gregory M. Duncan, Ph.D.

Vice President
NATIONAL ECONOMIC RESEARCH ASSOC. INC.
777 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET, STE. 4200
LOS ANGELES CA 90017
Jane Emerson
Manager Of Research

NEW PARADIGM RESOURCES GROUP, INC
12 S. MICHIGAN AVE., 5TH FLOOR
CHICAGO IL 60603
Karen M. Potkul
Attorney At Law
NEXTLINK CALIFORNIA, INC.
1924 E. DEERE AVENUE, STE 110
SANTA ANA CA 92705
(949) 417-7766
[email protected]
Steven Gorosh, Esq.

Vice President & General Counsel

NORTHPOINT COMMUNICATIONS
222 SUTTER STREET, 7TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94108
For: NORTHPOINT COMMUNICATIONS
Jose E. Guzman, Jr.

Attorney At Law
************

NOSSAMAN GUTHNER KNOX & ELLIOTT LLP
50 CALIFORNIA STREET, 34TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-4799
(415) 398-3600
[email protected]
SERVICE LIST *************
D.M. Carroll

PAGING SYSTEMS, INC
PO BOX 4249
BURLINGAME CA 94011-4249
Peter A. Casciato
Attorney At Law
For: METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PETER A. CASCIATO, A PROF. CORP. 8 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 701
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-4825
(415) 291-8661
[email protected]
Audrey P. Rasmussen
O'CONNOR & HANNAN, L.L.P.

SUITE 800
:919 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.
;';;,SHINGTON DC 20006-1400
:02) 887-1400
r.l~e Riley
:~~ICE OF ASSEMPLYMAN WALLY KNOX
:'-:-';TE CAPITOL
,. ')M 6025
, :,:-RAMENTO CA 95814
<6) 316-2042
• ," e. [email protected]
~ : .>j W. Daniel
. ~ : ,::m TELECOM.

BOX 9227
::r''';PORT BEACH CA 92658-9227
::',1:-1 K. Oshiro
:~unselor At Law
100 FIRST STREET, SUITE 2540
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 927-0158
[email protected]
James B. Young
COLLEN M. O'GRADY

PACIFIC BELL
140 NEW MONTGOMERY ST. RM 1619
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 545-0422
Robert Mazique
Attorney

PACIFIC BELL
140 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET
15TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 542-7712
For: Pacific Bell
Peter A. Casciato
Attorney At Law
PETER A. CASCIATO, A PROF. CORP.
8 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 701
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-4825
(4l5) 291-8661
[email protected]
For: Time Warner Telecom of California, L.P.

Bonnie Y. Cheng
Director Of Operations

PHOENIX INTEGRATION CORPORATION
7773 EAST GARVEY AVENUE., SUITE 832
ROSEMEAD CA 91770
(909) 868-0808
Jeff Hen4rix
PROTEL, INC.
4150 KIDRON ROAD
LAKELAND FL 33811
Deborah Kong

SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS
750 RIDDER PARK DRIVE
SAN JOSE CA 95190
(408) 920-5922
Stephen Buel

SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS
750 RIDDER PARK DRIVE
SAN JOSE CA 95126
Keith W. Melville
Attorney At Law

SEMPRA ENERGY
101 ASH STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101-3017
(619) 699-5039
[email protected]
David M. Norris
Attorney At Law
. SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY
6100 NEIL ROAD, PO BOX 10100
RENO NV 89520-0024
(775) 834-4208
[email protected]
Linda Burton

SIERRA TELEPHONE
PO BOX 219
OAKHURST CA 93644-0219
Carol B. Henningson
Attorney At Law
************

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE.,
ROSEMEAD CA 91770
(626) 302-1911
Jeffrey M. Pfaff
Attorney At Law

SPRINT PCS - LEGAL/REGULATORY
4900 MAIN STREET, 11TH FLOOR
KANSAS CITY MO 64112
(816) 559-1912
Thomas K. Braun

STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP
2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
ROSEMEAD CA 91770
(818) 302-4413
[email protected]
Charles H.N. Kallenbach
Attorney

SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTERED
3000 K STREET, NW., SUITE 300
WASHINGTON DC 20007
(202) 424-7715
For: L.D. Services, Inc.

James Falvey
Attorney

SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTERED
3000 K STREET, NW., SUITE 300
WASHINGTON DC 20007
(202) 424-7706
For: GST Lightwave (CA), Inc.

SERVICE ·LIST *************
Richard M. Rindler
Attorney

SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTERED
3000 K STREET, NW., SUITE 300
WASHINGTON DC 20007
(202) 424-7500
For: WorldCom Technologies, Inc.

Lawrence A. Walke
Attorney At Law

SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN LLC
3000 K STREET, NW, SUITE 300
WASHINGTON DC 20007
(202) 424-7500
For: DSLnet COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Phyllis Whitten

SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN, LLC
3000 K STREET, N.W., SUITE 300
WASHINGTON DC 20007-5116
(202) 424-7500
Andrew D. Lipman
KATHLEEN L. GREENMAN

SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN, LLP
3000 K ST., N.W., SUITE 300
WASHINGTON DC 20007
(202) 94~-6922
Carol Critchlow-Bentley

SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN, LLP
3000 K STREET, N.W., STE. 300
WASHINGTON DC 20007
(202) 424-7793
Louise Beale
Consultant
TECHNOLOGIES MANAGEMENT, INC.

PO DRAWER 200
WINTER PARK FL 32790-0200
(407) 740-8575
Julie Richey
Marketing Director

TEL COM PLUS
5251 110TH AVE. NORTH, STE 118
CLEARWATER FL 33760
(813) 572-7832
Mark O'Krent

TELEPHONE CONNECTION OF LOS ANGELES
9911 WEST PICO BLVD., STE. 680
LOS ANGELES CA 90035-2710
' .... ************ SERVICE LIST *************
Mike Freedman
Regional Business Manager
TELIGENT, INC.
111 BROADWAY,· SUITE 1300
OAKLAND CA 94607-5500
Terri Natoli
CAROLYN SHUP, ESQ.

Esquire
TELIGENT, INC.
8065 LEESBURG PIKE, STE 400
VIENNA VA 22180
Edwin D. Jones
TESCO
355 STARLING ROAD
MILL VALLEY CA 94941
(4l5) 383-1825
Patricia J Osorio

THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE
785 MARKET ST 3RD FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103-2003
Kenneth F. Melley, Jr.

Vice President Of Regulatory Affairs
U.S. LONG DISTANCE, INC.
9311 SAN PEDRO, SUITE 300
SAN ANTONIO TX 78216
(210) 525-9009
Steve Page
US DATA HIGHWAY CORP.
1113 HOPKINS WAY
PLEASANTON CA 94566
(925) 454-8624
Michael Shames
Attorney At Law

UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
1717 KETTNER BLVD., SUITE 101
SAN DIEGO CA 92101-2532
(619) 696-6966
[email protected]
Glen Carolo

VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED
47221 FREMONT BOULEVARD
FREMONT CA 94538
(510) 659-9955 X314
[email protected]
Bruce J. Weston
Attorney At Law
169 WEST HUBBARD AVENUE
COLUMBUS OH 43215-1439
Kathleen Villacorta
Attorney
WIGGINS & VI LLACORTA , P.A.

POST OFFICE BOX 1657
501 EAST TENNESSEE STREET, SUITE B
TALLAHASSEE FL 32302
(904) 222-1534
For: Business Discount Plan, Inc. d/b/a L:D.

Discount Plan
David Wilner
PO BOX 2340
NAVATO CA 94948-2340
. Maia Ettinger
Legal Director
WORKING ASSETS FUNDING SERVICE, INC.
101 MARKET STREET, NO. 700
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(4l5) 369-2084
Walter Mcgee

WORKING ASSETS FUNDING SERVICE
701 MONTGOMERY ST., SUITE 400
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
Rachelle B. Chong

WENDY CHOW/COUDERT BORTHERS
XL NETWORKS, INC.
4 EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 3300
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(4l5) 986-1300
For: XL NETWORKS, INC.

Rachelle B. Chong
XL NETWORKS, INC.
4 EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 3300
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(4l5) 986-1300
David A. Simpson
Attorney At Law

YOUNG VOGL HARLICK WILSON & SIMPSON LLP
425 CALIFORNIA ST., STE 2500
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104
(4l5) 291-1970
[email protected]
For: Bakersfield Cellular Telephone Company

Washington Pl
Interstate 405
SanDiego
Frwy
Minerva Ave
Albright AveBledsoe Ave
Tuller Ave
Interstate 405
SanDiego
Frwy
Sawtelle Blvd
Globe Ave
CA002_CLC_Culver_010-A

34.007113,-118.416993
4214-002-017
4214-002-018
4214-002-019
4214-002-020
4214-002-021
4214-002-022 4214-002-028
4214-002-0324214-002-0334214-002-034
4214-002-035
4214-002-036
4214-002-040
4214-002-041
4214-003-013
4214-003-014
4214-003-015
4214-003-016
4214-003-017
4214-003-018
4214-003-019
4214-003-020
4214-003-021
4214-003-022
4214-003-023
4214-003-024
4214-003-0254214-003-0264214-003-0274214-003-0284214-003-0294214-003-0304214-003-0314214-003-032 4214-006-007
4214-006-008
4214-006-009
4214-006-010
4214-006-011
4214-006-0124214-006-0134214-006-0144214-006-0154214-006-016 4214-006-033
4214-006-034
4214-006-035
4214-006-036
4214-006-037
4214-006-038
4214-006-039
4233-028-0074233-028-0084233-028-009
4233-028-010
4233-028-011
4233-028-012
4233-028-013
4233-028-014
4233-028-019
4233-028-020
4233-028-021
4233-028-022
4233-028-023
4233-030-001
4233-030-002
4233-030-003
4233-030-004
4233-030-005
4233-030-0224233-030-0234233-030-0244233-030-0254233-030-0264233-030-027 4233-030-028
4233-030-029
4233-030-030
4233-030-031
4233-030-032
4233-030-033
4233-031-0064233-031-0074233-031-0084233-031-0094233-031-010 4233-031-015
4233-031-016
4233-031-017
4233-031-018
4233-031-019
4233-031-022
4233-031-023
4233-031-028
4233-031-030
4233-031-031
CA002_CLC Culver 010-A
500' Radius Map
Culver City CA
Prepared 6/27/2022
by Express Mapping
1 inch = 150 feet .

3. ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS: For all other types of applications, the following must be provided:
a) Location and Zoning Information
i) Location of the project site, including the nearest registered address, the names of the two nearest cros s streets, GPS coordinates, and the present zone designation o f the project site.

Please see Construction Drawings.
ii) If the facility is proposed to be attached t o an existing utility pole, provide the pole number. (T o obtain a City-owne d streetligh t pole Facility I D number and to determine its small cell site status visit: Streetlight Inventory
SL-G5-04
iii) Applicant shall include signed documentation indicating that applicant is authorized b y the owner of the support structure and/or real property to install and operate the proposed facility.

N/A The city owns this streetlight. Crow n Castle has an agreement in place to use city streetlights fo r it’s wireless facilities. Please see the attached agreement. a) Description of the Proposed Project
A description of the proposed facility(ies), including whether the project is a new facility, a collocated facility, or a modification to an existing facility.

The proposed facility is a New Small Wireless facility to be collocated on a replacement streetlight pole.
ii) If the application is for a small cell facility, an explanation asserting all of the grounds why the proposed facility constitutes a small cell facility.

This application is for a Small Wireless Facility as it falls within the FCC’s definition of a Small Wireless Facility
Per FCC 18-133
“Small wireless facilities, consistent
with § 1.1312(e)(2), are facilities that
meet each of the following conditions:
(1) The facilities—
(i) Are mounted on structures 50 feet
or less in height including their
antennas as defined in § 1.1320(d); or
(ii) Are mounted on structures no
more than 10 percent taller than other
adjacent structures; or
(iii) Do not extend existing structures
on which they are located to a height of
more than 50 feet or by more than 10
percent, whichever is greater;
(2) Each antenna associated with the
deployment, excluding associated
antenna equipment (as defined in the
definition of ‘‘antenna’’ in § 1.1320(d)),
is no more than three cubic feet in
volume;
(3) All other wireless equipment
associated with the structure, including
the wireless equipment associated with
the antenna and any pre -existing
associated equipment on the structure,
is no more than 28 cubic feet in volume;
(4) The facilities do not require
antenna structure r egistration under part
17 of this chapter;
(5) The facilities are not located on
Tribal lands, as defined under 36 CFR
800.16(x); and
(6) The facilities do not result in
human exposure to radiofrequency
radiation in excess of the applicable
safety standards specified in § 1.1307(b).
iii) If a new facility, the applicant shall include an explanation of whether the new facility could and will be designed to accommodate future wireless facilities.

The facility can and will be redesigned to accommodate future wireless facilities if needed in the future.
iv) A list of all facilities and equipment proposed to be installed and the dimensions, weight, and manufacturer’s specifications for each.

Please see attached Construction Drawings.
v) A written description of the concealment measures applicant proposes to use to aesthetically blend the facility to the immediate surroundings and to minimize its visual impact. This should include, but not be limited to, a description of proposed concealment techniques, sizing and placement of elements of the facility (including undergrounding proposed), measures proposed to limit visibility of the facility from residential dwelling units, and the textures and colors to be used in the concealment process. If none, so state.

Crown Castle is concealing the facility to the greatest extent possible by placing all possible radio equipment and wiring within the shroud at the top of the replacement streetlight pole, in accordance with the city’s preferred design for streetlights. The streetlight will be covered with concrete texturing to mirror the surrounding light poles.

The shroud will be painted to match the streetlight pole. With the proposed shroud the facility will blend into the surrounding vertical infrastructure. vi) A description of any ground disturbance necessary to complete the proposed project.

The concrete near the streetlight pole will be opened to allow for the replacement of the existing streetlight pole and the placement of a grounding rod for the site. Additionally, there will be trenching and the placement of 2 handholes and conduit in the sidewalk near the power source and trenching in the street and the placement of a hand hole in the parkway near the node pole. Once installation is complete, the street and sidewalk will be restored to its existing condition.
vii) A description of the site and any deployment outside the site necessary to complete the proposed project.

The proposed site location is an existing streetlight pole. An underground fiberoptic connection from Crown’s existing fiber network already exists at the location. Outside of the immediate site location, we will be bringing in a power connection from an underground utility vault in the sidewalk to the northeast of the proposed location to power our facilities.
viii) A dimensioned map identifying and describing the distance to the nearest residential dwelling unit and any historical structure within 500 feet of the facility.

Please see attached Construction Drawings. There are no historical structures within 500 ft of the proposed facility.
ix) If a collocation, a description of why this installation qualifies as a collocation within the meaning of the FCC rules. Applicant must also provide the following:

We are proposing to attach to an existing structure that is being replaced to accommodate the additional weight of our equipment. Under Federal Law, this is a collocation. Please see the definition of a colocation from FCC 18-133 below. “3. Collocations on Structures Not
Previously Zoned for Wireless Use

64. The Commission takes this
opportunity to clarify that for purposes
of the Section 332 shot clocks,
attachment of facilities to e xisting
structures constitutes collocation,
regardless of whether the structure or
the location has previously been zoned
for wireless facilities. As the
Commission stated in 2009, ‘‘an
application is a request for collocation
if it does not involve a ‘sub stantial
increase in the size of a tower’ as
defined in the Nationwide
Programmatic Agreement (NPA) for the
Collocation of Wireless Antennas.’’ The
definition of ‘‘[c]ollocation’’ in the NPA
provides for the ‘‘mounting or
installation of an antenna on an existing
tower, building or structure for the
purpose of transmitting and/or receiving
radio frequency signals for
communications purposes, whether or
not there is an existing antenna on the
structure. ’’ The NPA’s definition of
collocation explicitly encom passes
collocations on structures and buildings
that have not yet been zoned for
wireless use. To interpret the NPA any
other way would be unduly narrow and
there is no persuasive reason to accept
a narrower interpretation. This is
particularly true given that the NPA
definition of collocation stands in direct
contrast with the definition of
collocation in the Spectrum Act,
pursuant to which facilities only fall
within the scope of an ‘‘eligible facilities
request’’ if they are attached to towers
or base st ations that have already been
zoned for wireless use.”
(1) A description of all installation procedures and plans for the facility; And
Once this facility is approved, the concrete near the streetlight pole will be opened to allow for the installation of a new foundation and the replacement of the existing streetlight pole and the placement of a grounding rod for the site.

Additionally, there will be trenching and the placement of 2 handholes and conduit in the sidewalk near the power source and trenching in the street and the placement of a hand hole in the parkway near the node pole. Once installation is complete, the street and sidewalk will be restored to its existing condition (2) A description of all changes to be made to the existing structure, which description will, among other things, identify precisely what changes will be made to the supporting structure.

The streetlight pole will be replaced to accommodate the additional weight of the facilities.

C) Prior Approvals/Permits
i) If a wireless facility already exists on the site, provide the following:
(1) A copy of all approvals and/or permits for the tower or base station that is to be modified, and any subsequent modification permits, and of any required conditions (imposed by the City and/or third party) placed on the initial or subsequent permits.

N/A – a wireless facility does not already exists on the site. (2) A showing that the facility, as modified, will be in compliance with existing conditions, whether or not it is in compliance with conditions as of the date of application. There must be a plan submitted for correction of any non-compliant condition.

N/A – a wireless facility does not already exists on the site. d) Site Plan
Please see attached electronic copy of the Construction Drawings. Per Conversations with Sammy Romo, no hard copies are needed.
i) Six (6) copies of a facility site plan at a scale of 1”=20’ or larger and including the following:
(1) A north-pointing arrow on each plan sheet;
(2) Title block with applicant’s name, owner’s name, and contact information;
(3) Depiction of the fully-constructed proposed facility; (4) Dimensioned drawings with specifications for each element of the proposed facility, clearly describing the site and all structures and facilities at the site before and after installation or modification; (5) Location of lot lines, streets (with street names), easements, and all structures and improvements, including accessory equipment, underground utilities and support structures, existing and proposed; (6) Existing and proposed elevations of all facilities, equipment, support structures, appurtenances, and other related structures (7) Slopes, contours, trees and other pertinent physical features of the site, existing and proposed;
(8) All exterior lighting on the site, existing and proposed; (9) Location use and approximate distance from property lines of the nearest structures on all properties abutting the site; and (10) The location of parking for maintenance personnel. e) Landscape Plan
Crown Castle is not providing a Landscape Plan. No landscaped ground will be disturbed.
i) If any landscaped ground will be disturbed, six (6) copies of a landscape plan for the site, at a scale of 1/8”=1’ or larger and including the following:
(1) Existing trees with trunk diameter over six inches (6”) at four feet (4’) above grade and/or fifteen feet (15’) in overall height within fifty feet (50’) of the proposed wireless communication facility;
(2) Species, diameter and condition of all such trees;
(3) Final disposition of all existing trees; and
(4) Species, location and sizes of trees and other vegetation proposed to be installed in conjunction with the wireless communication facility.
f) Site Photograph(s)
i) Current color photographs of the site and its surroundings.

Please see attached Photosimulations.
g) Visual Impact Analysis
i) A visual impact analysis, which shall include a before and after 360 degree photo simulation or similar technique, demonstrating, from all four primary directions (north, south, east, and west) the potential visual impacts of the proposed facility. Consideration shall be given to views from public areas as well as from private property. The analysis shall assess the cumulative impacts of the proposed wireless communication facility and other existing wireless facilities in the area, and shall identify and include all feasible mitigation measures consistent with the technological requirements of the proposed facility.

Please see attached Photosimulations. The site is minimally intrusive and was designed to comply with the city’s design guidelines. Given that this location is a Small Wireless facility, no Visual Impact Analysis will be provided because we are not asking for a variance from the city’s preferred design.
h) Noise
i) Operation of wireless facilities shall comply with the noise regulations set in Chapters 9.04 and 9.07 of the Code and the noise element of the General Plan.

Demonstrate compliance by providing, among other relevant information, a description of the facilities and/or equipment within the applicant’s project that are expected to induce or generate noise, as we ll as anticipated noise levels of said facilities and/or equipment. For facilities that generate noise, please provide testing data for noise assuming maximum facility utilization and operational utilization (worst case) 10 feet from the source. Specify ti mes and conditions during which noise generation will occur
This facility will comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance. Please see attached Noise Study
i) FCC Radio Frequency Standards
i) A report signed by a California licensed professional engineer with expertise in radio communications facilities and the calculation of radio frequency emissions that affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the proposed installation will be compliant with the FCC’s standards. The report must also contain the following:
(1) A description of each of the proposed antennas and all related fixtures, structures, appurtenances and apparatus, including the height above grade, volume in total cubic feet, materials, lighting, and the directionality of each antenna (e.g., omni, directional, etc.); (2) The frequency, modulation and class of service;
(3) A clear identification of areas, both vertically and horizontally, where exposure levels will exceed FCC standards for general public and occupational exposures. Please note that applicant’s analysis must show that it has appropriately taken cumulative exposures into account, and should show exposures based on “worst case” scenarios;
(4) A certification that the facility will comply with all applicable standards for radio frequency emissions, including cumulative effects, and a description of the manner in which the radio frequency emissions for the facility were calculated and the results of those calculations. Individual and cumulative emissions should be evaluated; and
(5) If the certification of the facility as currently installed, or as proposed to be modified, is subject to conditions designed to limit general public or occupational exposure, identify those conditions, and demonstrate that they have been satisfied, or describe when they will be satisfied.

Please see attached EME Report.
j) Structural Analysis
i) A report signed by a California licensed professional engineer qualified in structural engineering, containing the following:
(1) In the case of a wireless facility attached to existing infrastructure, documentation of the ability of the structure to support the antennas, the proposed method of affixing the antennas and the precise point at which the antennas shall be mounted;
(2) In the case of a facility with a support structure (e.g. monopole), documentation that the structure is capable of supporting the antennas (and any other equipment to be attached to or supported by the support structure) and complies with applicable laws and codes, as well as the structure’s capacity for additional collocated antennas, and the precise point at which the antennas shall be mounted; and
(3) A certification that the structure(s) on which the wireless facility (including all accessory equipment, such as radios, cabinets, etc.) will be placed can safely support the wireless facility; and that all elements of the wireless facility comply with applicable safety standards, including, without limitation, GO 95, 165, and 166.

The streetlight pole is being replaced to accommodate the weight of the additional equipment being added to the pole. Please see the streetlight pole plans integrated into the construction drawings. Please see attached Construction Drawings documenting the site’s compliance with all applicable safety standards
k) Notice
i) Evidence that notice has been given consistent with Attachment 1 to all necessary parties. Notice will be posted and mailed upon resubmission of the NOI. This is to ensure that any changes requested by the NOI are included on the notice. l) Justification for Location/Collocation
i) A justification as to why the applicant chose the location for the proposed wireless communication facility. Such justification shall include a written assessment of not less than two (2) alternative locations considered by the applicant and the reasons why said alternative locations were rejected as candidates.

This location is fronting major commercial property on a streetlight, b oth of which are the city’s highest preference in location and pole type. As such we do not believe that an alternative analysis is needed.
ii) A written explanation of the applicant’s investigation into collocating the proposed facility with an existing facility. Indicate whether collocation is or is not feasible and why.

Collocation with an existing Small Wireless facility is not feasible, because there are no other Small Wireless Facilities within the proposed service area. m) Map of Applicant’s Existing Wireless Facilities and Coverage Assessment i) A map and narrative description of all existing wireless facility sites used by the applicant which are located within the City, and any wireless facility sites located outside o f the City, but which provide coverage within any part of the City.

Please see the attached Alternative Site Analysis .

4. WAIVER REQUEST [if applicable]
a) If it is contended that the City is required by federal or state law to approve the facility, applicant must submit the information it relies upon to support that claim, identifying: (i) the legal standard it claims applies; (ii) the showings it relies upon for its claim; (iii) alternative legal standards that may apply that it claims to meet; and (iv) the showings it relies upon for those claims. Applicants are cautioned that, should they choose not to submit with respect to items (iii) and (iv), and the City believes that applicant misapplies or relies on the wrong legal standard, the waiver (and consequently th e application) ma y be denied.

PART D: CERTIFICATION (ALL APPLICANTS)
I (we) hereby certify under penalty of perjury that (1) after diligent investigation, the information provided pursuant t o this Application Form is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief; and (2) upon completion of the work proposed, th e permitted personal wireless services facility will comply with all applicable laws, regulation, practice s or other requirements under federal, state, or local law, including, but not limited to, building and electrical codes, the FCC’s radio frequency emissions standards, and the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. /s/ John Halminski 10/11/2022
________________________________________________
Applicant’s Signature Date
John Halminski
___________________________
Applicant’s Printed Name

18 Morgan Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92618
www.mobilenet.net

Report Date: 10/19/2022
RF Emissions Compliance Report
SITE – CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 • 11317 Washington Pl, Culver City, CA 90066

Prepared For - Crown Castle, 200 Spectrum Center Drive. Irvine, CA - 92618

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 3
Proprietary & confidential
Executive Summary
Crown Castle has contracted MobileNet Services to evaluate the Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Compliance of the proposed site below. Compliance is based on the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) Rules and Regulations for human exposure to electromagnetic fields.

Site Name: CA002_CLC_CULVER_010

Latitude: 34.007113°

Longitude: -118.416993°

Structure Type: Metal Streetlight Pole

Address: 11317 Washington Pl, Culver City, CA 90066

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 4
Proprietary & confidential
FCC RF Exposure Guidelines
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has provided standards (FCC 96 -326) for RF exposure which are derived from recommendations of two expert organizations, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) Section 17.4.5 Report No. 86 and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 C95.1 -1992. The FCC consulted with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and obtained their support for the guidelines that the FCC is using. The exposure guidelines incorporate prudent margins of safety.

The FCC has classified Radio Frequency ( RF) exposure limits into two tiers - General Population or “Uncontrolled Environment” and Occupational or “Controlled Environment”. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to RF electromagnetic fields. The General Public limits are generally five times more restrictive than the Occupational limit.
• General Population/Uncontrolled – Exposure l imits apply in situations in which the general public may be exposed, or in which persons that are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. • Occupational/Controlled – Exposure limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and are fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure.

Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) – FCC OET Bulletin 65 Table 1 of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1310

where f = frequency in MHz

In situations where the predicted MPE exceeds the General Population threshold in an accessible area because of emissions from multiple transmitters, FCC licensees that contribute greater than 5% of the aggregate MPE share responsibility for mitigation per 47 C.F.R § 1.1307(b)(3).

Frequency Range Occupational Exposure Limit Averaging Time Public Exposure Limit Averaging Time 30-300 MHz 1 mW/cm² 30 mins. 0.2 mW/cm² 6 mins.
300-1500 MHz f/300 mW/cm² 30 mins. f/1500 mW/cm² 6 mins. 1500-100,000 MHz 5 mW/cm² 30 mins. 1 mW/cm² 6 mins.

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 5
Proprietary & confidential
Analysis
Based on the provided information from Crown Castle the proposed site will contain (3) 5G Antenna/Radio integrated units mounted atop a metal streetlight pole in the public right -of-way located in Culver City, CA. The predictive RF power density resulting from each transmitter at any location is expressed as a percentage of the FCC limit. It is assumed that all antenna specified channels are transmitting simultaneously, and that the radio transmitters are operating at maximum power. As predicted by RoofMaster™ the MPE values for both ground and antenna level are shown in the table below.

Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) at Ground/Generally Accessible Areas & Antenna Level

From Figure 2 in the Elevation Detail Plots the following keep-back distances to the FCC limits can be determined as follows:

Distance to FCC 100% MPE Limits at the Antenna Level
• Vertical Stand-off Distance (General Population) 3.71 feet • Vertical Stand-off Distance (Occupational Population) N/A • Horizontal Stand-off Distance (General Population) 5.26 feet • Horizontal Stand-off Distance (Occupational Population) N/A

Distance to FCC 100% MPE Limits at Ground Level
• Horizontal Stand-off Distance (General Population) N/A • Horizontal Stand-off Distance (Occupational Population) N/A

Reference Plane Maximum Level:

General Population (%)
Maximum Level:

Occupational (%)
Ground Level 0.14 0.03
Antenna Level 368.21 73.64

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 6
Proprietary & confidential
Elevation Detail
Figure 1:Predicted MPE shown at the center of a 6-foot vertical space that a person could occupy at ground level

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 7
Proprietary & confidential
Figure 2: Enlarged view of Antenna Level MPE limits

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 8
Proprietary & confidential
Figure 3: Top-Down View at Antenna Level MPE limits

Antenna Inventory

Antenna
Number Antenna ID Operator Antenna
Mfg Antenna Model Freq
(MHz)
Azimuth
(deg)
Tilt
(deg)
HBW
(deg)
Aper
(ft)
TPO
(W) Paths Loss
(db)
Antenna
Gain (dbd)
EIRP
(W)
RC AGL
(ft)
1 1 Verizon ERICSSON SON SM6705 CM1 02.07.22 28GHz VZW28000 0 0 4 1.3 0.3 4 0 26.14 809 36.4 2 2 Verizon ERICSSON SON SM6705 CM1 02.07.22 28GHz VZW28000 120 0 4 1.3 0.3 4 0 26.14 809 36.4 3 3 Verizon ERICSSON SON SM6705 CM1 02.07.22 28GHz VZW28000 240 0 4 1.3 0.3 4 0 26.14 809 36.4

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 9
Proprietary & confidential
Evaluation

Ground Level - For any person standing at accessible areas such as the ground level, calculations resulted in exposure levels well below (< 1%) the FCCs General Population MPE limit.

Antenna Level – Any areas exceeding 100% of the General Population Limits are displayed as Blue. As seen in Figures 1 and 2 the FCC's general population limit maybe exceeded within 6ft of the antenna. Any personnel accessing the pole and working within the area exceeding 100% of the limit should coordinate with the wireless operator or work should be performed by personnel trained in proper RF safety. Any work on the pole where the area is displayed as either Green or shows no color does not exceeding hazardous exposure levels and requires no action to maintain a safe working environment.

RF Signage Recommendation
For the facility to be classified as Occupational/Controlled environment the following actions are recommended in accordance with the FCC's and Crown Castle's RF safety guidelines:
• Install NOTICE sign(s) near the bottom of the pole or on the shroud any time there is a zone near the antenna that exceeds the General Population limit. This sign should be mounted where it is easily visible to workers on the ground as they approach the pole. Recommend placing on pole about 7-9’ from the ground level.

• Install CAUTION sign(s) on or near the antenna(s) with a Keep Back Distance of 6ft. Keep Back distance must be filled in on the sign. This sign must be mounted on or just below the radiating antenna where it is visible to workers approaching the antenna in a lift or bucket truck. Recommend placing on pole at 29ft from ground level.

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 10
Proprietary & confidential
Figure 4: RF Signage Recommendation

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 11
Proprietary & confidential
Calculation Methodology

MobileNet Services has performed theoretical modeling using RoofMaster™ developed by Waterford Consultants, LLC to predict the overall maximum permissible exposure (MPE) possible at any particular location given the spatial orientation and operating parameters of multiple RF sources . The input data for the calculations is based u pon information provided by the client.

RoofMaster™ predictive models comprise of the Far Field model as specified in OET -65 as well as use of the OET -65 Cylindrical Model (Sula09). These models utilize several operational specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially averaged power densities that can be conveyed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit.

The power density in the Far Field of an RF source is described by OET-65 Equation (4) as the following equation:

𝑆 =
𝐸𝐼𝑅𝑃
4⋅𝜋⋅𝑅2 (𝑚𝑊 𝑐𝑚2⁄ ),
where EIRP is the Effective Radiated Power relative to an isotropic antenna and R is the distance between the antenna and the point of study. At any location, the predicted power density in the Far Field is the spatial averaging of points within a 0-to-6-foot vertical space that a person would occupy.

The Near field power density is described by OET-65 Equation (20) is represented as the following equation:

𝑆 = (
180
𝜃𝐵𝑊
) ∙
100∙𝑃𝑖𝑛
𝜋∙𝑅∙ℎ (𝑚𝑊 𝑐𝑚2⁄ ),

where 𝑃𝑖𝑛 is the power input to the antenna , ℎ is the aperture length and 𝜃𝐵𝑊 is the beam width of the antenna in degrees.

Conclusion

The proposed site will be COMPLIANT with the FCC guidelines limiting public exposure to RF energy. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. The RF exposure levels from the proposed site will be well below the maximum permissible levels and complies with Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure Limits of 47 C.F.R § 1.1307(b)(3) and 47 CFR § 1.1310.

18 Morgan Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92618
www.mobilenet.net
Report Date: 10/19/2022
Noise Study Report
SITE – CA002_CLC_CULVER_010 • 11317 Washington Pl. Culver City, CA 90066

Prepared For - Crown Castle, 200 Spectrum Center Drive. Irvine, CA - 92618

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 2
Proprietary & confidential
Executive Summary
Crown Castle has contracted MobileNet Services to evaluate the noise level compliancy of a proposed small cell site with that of the limits set forth by the municipality of Culver City, CA. Crown Castle proposes to install (3) Ericsson Streetmacro 6705 integrated 5G panel type antennas mounted atop a street light pole in the public right-of-way near 11317 Washington Pl. Culver City, CA 90066. Noise from the proposed operation of this site will comply with the City’s appropriate noise limits/regulations.

Site Name: CA002_CLC_CULVER_010

Latitude: 34.007113°

Longitude: -118.416993°

Structure Type: Streetlight Pole

Address: 11317 Washington Pl. Culver City, CA 90066

Current Municipal Standards
The City of Culver City establishes guidelines pertaining to limits on maximum noise levels in the General Plan Noise Element Document. Table N.3 Interior and Exterior Noise Standards, shown below, defines Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) for different categories of land use. The proposed location of the site places it in an area zoned for industrial usage.

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 3
Proprietary & confidential
Table 1: Culver City General Plan Noise Element – Interior and Exterior Noise Standards

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 4
Proprietary & confidential
Fundamentals and Calculation Methodology
The amplitude of pressure waves generated by a sound source determines the loudness of that source. Sound pressure amplitude is measured in micro -Pascals (mPa ). One mPa is approximately one hundred billion th (0.00000000001) of normal atmospheric pressure. Sound pressure amplitudes for different kinds of noise environments can range from less than 100 to 100,000,000 mPa. Because of this huge range of values, sound is rarely expressed in terms of mPa. Instead, a logarithmic scale is used to describe sound pressure level (SPL) in terms of decibels (dB). The threshold of hearing for young people is about 0 dB, which corresponds to 20 mPa.

However, the decibel scale alone does not adequately characterize how humans perceive noise.

Human hearing is limited in the range of audible frequencies as well as in the way it perceives the SPL in that range.

In general, people are most sensi tive to the frequency range of 1,000 –8,000 Hz and perceive sounds within that range better than sounds of the same amplitude in higher or lower frequencies. To approximate the response of the human ear, sound levels of individual frequency bands are weight ed, depending on the human sensitivity to those frequencies. Then, an “A -weighted” sound level (expressed in units of dBA) can be computed based on this information.

The A-weighting network approximates the frequency response of the average young ear when listening to most ordinary sounds. This frequency response (shown below) as defined by the International Standard IEC 61672:2003 is incorporated into most calibrated field test equipment used to measure noise level.

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 5
Proprietary & confidential
The table below describes typical A-weighted noise levels for various noise sources.

Manufacturers of a variety of equipment such as but not limited to HVAC systems, power g enerators and telecommunication devices will usually test their product s to determine the noise level at a particular known set distance. From this information provided by the manufacturers we can determine the corresponding sound pressure level at any distance such as nearby buildings and or property lines with the following formula:

𝑆𝑃𝐿2 = 𝑆𝑃𝐿 1 − 20log (𝑟2 𝑟1⁄ ), … (1)

where 𝑆𝑃𝐿1 is the noise level at distance 𝑟1 and 𝑆𝑃𝐿 2 is the noise level at distance 𝑟2.

Because decibels are logarithmic units, SPL cannot be added or subtracted through ordinary arithmetic. Under the decibel scale, a doubling of sound energy corresponds to a 3 -dB increase. In other words, when two identical sources are each producing sound of the same loudness, the resulting sound level at a given distance would be 3 dB higher than one source under the same conditions . Mathematically we can also calculate the addition of multiple sources by the following formula:

𝑆𝑃𝐿Total = 10log[ 10𝑆𝑃𝐿1 10⁄ + 10𝑆𝑃𝐿2 10⁄ + 10𝑆𝑃𝐿3 10⁄ … + 10𝑆𝑃𝐿𝑁 10⁄ ], … (2)

where 𝑆𝑃𝐿1 and 𝑆𝑃𝐿𝑁 are the separate sound pressure level, and 𝑁 is the total number of individual noise sources.

Irvine, CA • 949-951-4444 Page 6
Proprietary & confidential
Proposed Equipment
Based on the information provided by Crown Castle the carrier plans to install (3) Streetmacro 6705 integrated 5G panel type antennas mounted atop a street light pole in the public right-of-way on the southern side of a commercial neighborhood zoned area near 11317 Washington Pl. Culver City, CA 90066. The nearest property line to the noise source is approximately 8 feet to the north.

Study Results
Per the manufacturers’ specification sheet, the maximum noise level is as follows:

*Adjusted valued based on manufactured data to reflect the average yearly high temperature in Culver City of 78°F ** Assumed reference distance according to manufacturer’s trend for other similarly listed products.

It is assumed that there no other stationary noise sources nearby. Therefore, the maximum calculated noise level for the combined continuous operation of the three installed remote radio units is 48dBA. This is below the City’s most restrictive Exterior A-Weighted Noise Level of 65 dBA for exterior commercial neighborhood areas of Culver City.

Conclusion
From the analysis above and all provided information it is the believe that the operation of the Crown Castle small cell located at 11317 Washington Pl. Culver City, CA 90066 will comply with that City’s requirements for limiting the emission of noise levels.

Equipment Maximum Noise Level
(dBA)
Reference Distance
(meters)
Ericsson Streetmacro 6705 51* 1**

11-Nov-22
DESIGN SUMMARY:

The calculations contained within this document represent customer specified antenna and equipment loading used to design the pole structure that is structurally adequate to accommodate the loading in accordance with all industry standards and local building codes.

Revision A: Added Design Summary to Cover.

Western UT Project No.: 22-0170
Dated:

November 11, 2022
Structural Calculations
with Foundation Design
For A:

Located At:
35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole
Prepared for:

Various Nodes in Southern CA
Los Angeles County
Crown Castle
5032 Salem-Dallas Highway NW, Salem, OR 97304
Phone: (503) 587-0101; Fax: (503) 316-1864
www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com

Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 11/11/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA
Loading, Codes, and Materials: Design Loading Page 1
Design Criteria
Codes and Specifications
Materials
Design Calculations: Per ANSI/TIA 222-H - Wind Load Case: Page 2 - 3 Wind Pressure
Antenna/Appurtenance Wind Loading
Base Reactions
Design Calculations: Per AASHTO LRFD LTS-1- Wind Load Case: Page 6 - 7 Wind Pressure
Monopole Shaft Wind Loading
Antenna/Appurtenance Wind Loading
Base Reactions
Monopole Shaft Stress Check: Per ANSI/TIA 222-H Page 8 Monopole Shaft Stress Check: Per AASHTO LRFD LTS-1 Page 9 Anchor Bolt, Base Plate & Weld Design: Per ANSI/TIA 222-H Page 10 Anchor Bolt, Base Plate & Weld Design: Per AASHTO LRFD LTS-1 Page 11 Seismic Base Shear Comparision: Page 12
Drilled Pier Foundation Design: Page 13 - 14
Optional Diirect Embed Section Foundation Design: Page 15 Alternative Slab Foundation Design: Page 16 -18

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SEAL
Table of Contents
I hereby certify that this structural design report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of California. 11-Nov-22
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com

Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 8/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 1
Design Loading:

Antenna(s): (1) - 18" Ø x 80" Tall Antenna/Shroud Assy, Wt. = 850 lbs., C.L. @ 38.5' ± AGL (2) - LED Luminaire w/photocell, Wt. = 20 lbs., C.L. @ 35' ± AGL (2) - 8' Long (Max.) Luminaire Arm, Wt. = 45 lbs., C.L. @ 32.5' ± AGL (1) - Street Sign, Wt. = 30 lbs. C.L. @ 11' ± AGL
(1) - CCI RF Notice Sign, Wt. = 6 lbs. C.L. @ 9' ± AGL
Design Criteria:

Basic Wind Speed (V): 94 mph (3-Second Gust) Per ANSI/TIA-222-H & 2019 CBC, Section 1609.1.1, Exc. 5 Risk Category: II Per Table 2-1
Exposure Category: C Per Section 2.6.5.1
Topographic Category: 1 Per Section 2.6.6.2
Ice: Not required for this structure per Annex B
Seismic: Per 2019 CBC Section 1613 ASCE 7-16 Sections 15.1.3 & 12.8 Standards and Design Codes:

Industry Standards: ANSI/TIA 222-H & 2019 CBC
Concrete: ACI 318-14
Steel: AISC "Steel Construction Manual", 15th Edition
Welding: ANSI/AWS D1.1-15
Soil: Per 2019 CBC, Table1806.2, Class 5 Material
Materials:

Pole Shaft: ASTM A595 Gr. A (Minimum FY = 55 ksi)
Baseplate: ASTM A36
Ports: ASTM A500 Gr. B
Plates: ASTM A36
Welds: E70XX Electrodes
Structural Bolts: ASTM F3125 Gr. A325
Anchor Bolts: ASTM F1554 Gr. 55
Rebar: ASTM A615 Gr. 60
Coatings:

Galvanizing: ASTM A123
Loading, Codes, and Materials
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 8/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page No.: 2
Reference: ANSI/TIA-222-H, Section 2.6.11.6 Velocity Pressure, qz = 0.00256 * K z * K zt * K e * K d * V 2 Where:

V = 94 mph (3-Second Gust Basic Wind Speed) K z = Velocity Pressure Exposure Coefficient, Section 2.6.5.2 and Table 2-4 GH = 1.10 Gust Response Factor - 1.10 for Poles K zt = Topographic Factor, Section 2.6.6.2, Table 2-4 and 2-5 Kd = 0.95 Wind Direction Probability Factor K e = Ground Elevation Factor, Section 2.6.8 Ke = 1.00 Ground Elevation Factor K d = Wind Direction Probability Factor, Table 2-2 II :Risk Category V = Basic Wind Speed, 3-Second Gust, mph C :Exposure Category
1 :Topographic Category Section Wind Force, F ST = q Z * G H * (EPA) S Where:
(EPA) s = C f A P
Average Section
Elevation
(Feet AGL)
Section Width
(Point-to-Point)
(inches)
Monopole Shaft Wall
Thickness
(inches)
Section Height
(feet)
Section Elevation
At Base
(Feet)
Gross Section Area
(Square Feet)
(mph - feet)
Force Coefficient
Velocity Pressure
Coefficient
Topographic
Factor
Wind Direction
Probability Factor
Ground Elevation
Factor
Velocity Pressure
(psf)
Gust Effect
Factor
Applied Wind
Pressure
(psf)
Factored Section
Base Wind Shear
(kips)
Section Base
Wind Moment
(Foot-kips)
Factored Section
Base Wind Moment
(Foot-kips)
Factored Section
Base Seismic Shear
(kips)
Section Base
Seismic Moment
(Foot-kips)
Section Weight
(kips)
Z DP TW H ZBase AP C CF KZ KZt Kd Ke qZ GH qZGH FST FST * Z FST*Z WT*Cs WT*Cs*Z WT

1.46 10.60 0.179 2.92 0.00 2.6 70.7 1.20 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.3 1.10 20.1 0.062 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.05 0.057

4.38 10.16 0.179 2.92 2.92 2.47 67.8 1.20 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.3 1.10 20.1 0.060 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.13 0.054

7.29 9.72 0.179 2.92 5.83 2.36 64.8 1.20 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.3 1.10 20.1 0.057 0.42 0.42 0.03 0.21 0.052

10.21 9.28 0.179 2.92 8.75 2.25 61.9 1.20 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.3 1.10 20.1 0.054 0.55 0.55 0.03 0.29 0.049

13.13 8.84 0.179 2.92 11.7 2.15 58.9 1.20 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.3 1.10 20.1 0.052 0.68 0.68 0.03 0.35 0.047

16.04 8.39 0.179 2.92 14.6 2.04 56.4 1.20 0.86 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.5 1.10 20.4 0.050 0.80 0.80 0.03 0.40 0.045

18.96 7.95 0.179 2.92 17.5 1.93 54.3 1.20 0.89 1.00 0.95 1.00 19.2 1.10 21.1 0.049 0.93 0.93 0.02 0.45 0.042

21.88 7.51 0.179 2.92 20.4 1.83 52.1 1.20 0.92 1.00 0.95 1.00 19.7 1.10 21.7 0.048 1.04 1.04 0.02 0.49 0.040

24.79 7.07 0.179 2.92 23.3 1.72 49.7 1.20 0.94 1.00 0.95 1.00 20.3 1.10 22.3 0.046 1.14 1.14 0.02 0.52 0.037

27.71 6.63 0.179 2.92 26.3 1.61 47.1 1.20 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 20.8 1.10 22.8 0.044 1.22 1.22 0.02 0.55 0.035

30.63 6.18 0.179 2.92 29.2 1.50 44.4 1.20 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 21.2 1.10 23.3 0.042 1.29 1.29 0.02 0.56 0.033

33.54 5.74 0.179 2.92 32.1 1.40 41.7 1.20 1.01 1.00 0.95 1.00 21.6 1.10 23.8 0.040 1.34 1.34 0.02 0.57 0.030 Loading Summations: 0.603 9.75 9.75 0.29 4.59 0.52
Overall Length of Pole = 35.00 feet
Base Elevation of Pole = 0.00 feet (AGL)
Top of Steel Elevation = 35.00 feet (AGL)

1.67 1.80
EPAS

3.09 2.96

2.83 2.71

2.58 2.45

2.32 2.19

2.06 1.93 Effective Section
Area
(Square Feet)
Wind Loading Calculations: Monopole Shaft
Shaft Section Properties Section Area Wind Pressure Wind Loading Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 8/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 3
CL Elevation (feet)
Offset from Shaft
C.L. (in.)
Quantity Per
Sector
Weight
(lbs)
Height
(inches)
Width
(inches)
Depth
(inches)
Shielding Factor
Ka
Ca Calc
(Normal)
Ca Calc
(Transverse)
(EPA)N
(ft2)
(EPA)T
(ft2)
(EPA)A
(ft2)
Unfactored Wind
Pressure (psf)
Factored Vwind
(kips)
Factored Wind
Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mwind
(ft-kips)
Vseismic
(kips)
Factored Seismic
Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mseismic
(ft-kips)
Factored
Total Wt
(kips)
Shear, Moment, and Weight Summations: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CL Elevation (feet)
Offset from Shaft
C.L. (in.)
Quantity
Weight
(lbs)
Shape
Round (R) or
Flat (F)
Height
(inches)
Width
(inches)
Area Factor
AA
(ft2)
Aspect Ratio
(Height / Width)
C
Ca
CaAA
(ft2)
ΣCaAA
(ft2)
Factored Wind
Pressure (psf)
Factored Vwind
(kips)
Factored Wind
Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mwind
(ft-kips)
Vseismic
(kips)
Factored Seismic
Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mseismic
(ft-kips)
Factored
Total Wt
(kips)

38.5 0.0 1 850.0 R 84.0 18.0 1.00 10.50 4.67 143 0.55 5.76 5.76 22.2 0.128 0.00 4.93 0.48 0.00 18.49 1.02

35.0 0.0 2 20.0 F 6.4 22.1 1.00 0.98 3.45 N/A 1.24 1.22 2.44 21.8 0.053 0.00 1.86 0.02 0.00 0.79 0.05

32.5 0.0 2 45.0 R 2.4 96.0 1.00 1.58 40.42 752 0.60 0.95 1.90 21.5 0.041 0.00 1.33 0.05 0.00 1.65 0.11

11.0 20.0 1 30.0 F 9.0 36.0 1.00 2.25 4.00 N/A 1.27 2.85 2.85 18.3 0.052 0.09 0.57 0.02 0.03 0.19 0.04

9.0 2.0 1 6.0 F 9.0 9.0 1.00 0.56 1.00 N/A 1.20 0.68 0.68 18.3 0.012 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 Shear, Moment, and Weight Summations: 0.29 0.09 8.80 0.57 0.03 21.15 1.22 Design Base Moment, M base = 19.9 ft-kips : MShaft + Mappurtenance + MPΔ Design Base Moment, M base = 25.73 ft-kips : MShaft + Mappurtenance + MPΔ Design Base Shear, V base = 0.89 kips : VShaft + VAppurtenance Design Base Shear, V base = 0.87 kips : VShaft + VAppurtenance Design Base Torsion, T base = 0.09 kips : TShaft + TAppurtenance Design Base Torsion, T base = 0.03 ft-kips : TShaft + TAppurtenance Design Base Weight, WT base = 1.85 kips : WtShaft + WtAppurtenance Design Base Weight, WT base = 2.36 kips : WtShaft + WtAppurtenance Description
18" Ø x 80" Tall Antenna/Shroud Assy
LED Luminaire w/photocell
8' Long (Max.) Luminaire Arm
Description
For Load Combination: 1.2D + 1.0E V + 1.0 E h :For Load Combination: 1.2D + 1.0W o :

Seismic Loading Summary - Factored Base Reactions: Wind Loading Summary - Factored Base Reactions:

Wind Loading Calculations - Sectorized Antennas and Mounts:

Factored Loads
CCI RF Notice Sign
Street Sign
Wind Loading Calculations - Miscellaneous Appurtenances:

Factored Loads
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 8/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page No.: 6
Reference: AASHTO LRFD-LTS-1, 2015 (w/ 2017 Interim Revs), Sec. 3 Design Wind Pressure, P z = 0.00256 * K z * K d * G * V 2 Where:

V(ult) = 110 mph (3-Second Gust) K z = Velocity Pressure Exposure Coefficient, Section 3.8.4 and Eqn. 3.8.4-1 G = 1.14 Gust Effect Factor, Section 3.8.6, Min. Value = 1.14 K d = Wind Direction Probability Factor, Table 3.8.5-1 Kd = 0.95 Wind Direction Probability Factor V = Basic Wind Speed, 3-Second Gust, mph I = 1 Importance Factor
II :Risk Category
C :Exposure Category Section Wind Force, F ST = P Z * (EPA) S Where:
1 :Topographic Category (EPA) s = C d A P
C d = Drag Coefficient, Section 3.8.7
Cv = 1.0 :Wind Drag Coefficient (= 0.8 for the Extreme Limit State and 1.0 otherwise), Section 3.8.7 Average Section
Elevation
(Feet)
Section Pipe
Diameter
(inches)
Monopole Shaft Wall
Thickness
(inches)
Section Height
(feet)
Section Elevation
At Base
(Feet)
Gross Section Area
(Square Feet)
(mph - feet)
Drag Coefficient
Velocity Pressure
Coefficient
Wind Direction
Probability Factor
Importance
Factor
Velocity Pressure
(psf)
Gust Effect
Factor
Applied Wind
Pressure
(psf)
Section Base
Wind Shear
(kips)
Factored Section
Base Wind Shear
(kips)
Section Base
Wind Moment
(Foot-kips)
Factored Section
Base Wind Moment
(Foot-kips)
Section Weight
(kips)
Z DP TW H ZBase AP Cv*V*d Cd KZ Kd I PZ G PZG FST 1.0*FST FST * Z 1.0*FST*Z WT

1.46 10.60 0.179 2.92 0.00 2.58 97.2 1.20 0.85 0.95 1.00 25.0 1.14 28.5 0.088 0.088 0.13 0.13 0.06

4.38 10.16 0.179 2.92 2.92 2.47 93.1 1.20 0.85 0.95 1.00 25.0 1.14 28.5 0.085 0.085 0.37 0.37 0.05

7.29 9.72 0.179 2.92 5.8 2.36 89.1 1.20 0.85 0.95 1.00 25.0 1.14 28.5 0.081 0.081 0.59 0.59 0.05

10.21 9.28 0.179 2.92 8.8 2.25 85.0 1.20 0.85 0.95 1.00 25.0 1.14 28.5 0.077 0.077 0.79 0.79 0.05

13.13 8.84 0.179 2.92 11.7 2.15 81.0 1.20 0.85 0.95 1.00 25.0 1.14 28.5 0.073 0.073 0.96 0.96 0.05

16.04 8.39 0.179 2.92 14.6 2.04 76.9 1.20 0.86 0.95 1.00 25.3 1.14 28.9 0.071 0.071 1.13 1.13 0.04

18.96 7.95 0.179 2.92 17.5 1.93 72.9 1.20 0.89 0.95 1.00 26.2 1.14 29.9 0.069 0.069 1.32 1.32 0.04

21.88 7.51 0.179 2.92 20.4 1.83 68.8 1.20 0.92 0.95 1.00 27.0 1.14 30.8 0.068 0.068 1.48 1.48 0.04

24.79 7.07 0.179 2.92 23.3 1.72 64.8 1.20 0.94 0.95 1.00 27.8 1.14 31.7 0.065 0.065 1.62 1.62 0.04

27.71 6.63 0.179 2.92 26.3 1.61 60.7 1.20 0.97 0.95 1.00 28.4 1.14 32.4 0.063 0.063 1.74 1.74 0.04

30.63 6.18 0.179 2.92 29.2 1.50 56.7 1.20 0.99 0.95 1.00 29.0 1.14 33.1 0.060 0.060 1.83 1.83 0.03

33.54 5.74 0.179 2.92 32.1 1.40 52.6 1.20 1.01 0.95 1.00 29.6 1.14 33.7 0.056 0.056 1.89 1.89 0.03 Loading Summations: 0.86 0.86 13.84 13.84 0.52
Overall Length of Pole = 35.00 feet Deflection at Top of Pole = 15.57 inches Base Elevation of Pole = 0.00 feet (AGL) Sway at Top of Pole = 2.12 degrees Top of Steel Elevation = 35.00 feet (AGL) Moment Due to P-D Effects = 1.59 ft-kips Wind Loading Calculations: Monopole Shaft
Shaft Section Properties Section Area Wind Pressure Wind Loading Effective Section
Area
(Square Feet)
EPAS

3.09 2.96

2.83 2.71

2.58 2.45

2.32 2.19

2.06 1.93

1.80 1.67
Ph: (503) 587-0101 ; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 8/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 7
CL Elevation (feet)
Offset from Shaft
C.L. (in.)
Quantity Per
Sector
Weight
(lbs)
Height
(inches)
Width
(inches)
Depth
(inches)
Shielding Factor
Ka
Ca Calc
(Normal)
Ca Calc
(Transverse)
(EPA)N
(ft2)
(EPA)T
(ft2)
(EPA)A
(ft2)
Wind Pressure
(psf)
Factored Vwind
(kips)
Factored Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mwind
(ft-kips)
Factored
Total Wt
(kips)
Shear, Moment, and Weight Summations: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CL Elevation (feet)
Offset from Shaft
C.L. (in.)
Quantity
Weight
(lbs)
Shape
Round (R) or
Flat (F)
Height
(inches)
Width
(inches)
Area Factor
AA
(ft2)
Aspect Ratio
(Height / Width)
CvVd
Wind Drag
Coefficient, Cd
CdAA
(ft2)
ΣCaAA
(ft2)
Wind Pressure
(psf)
Factored Vwind
(kips)
Factored Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mwind
(ft-kips)
Factored
Total Wt
(kips)

38.5 0.0 1 850 R 84.0 18.0 1.00 10.50 4.67 165 0.45 4.73 4.73 34.7 0.16 0.04 6.32 1.02

35.0 0.0 2 20 F 6.4 22.1 1.00 0.98 3.45 N/A 1.20 1.18 2.36 34.0 0.08 0.02 2.81 0.05

32.5 0.0 2 45 R 2.4 96.0 1.00 1.58 40.42 880 0.45 0.71 1.43 33.5 0.05 0.06 1.55 0.11

11.0 20.0 1 30 F 9.0 36.0 1.00 2.25 4.00 N/A 1.20 2.70 2.70 28.5 0.08 0.13 0.85 0.04

9.0 2.0 1 6 F 9.0 9.0 1.00 0.56 1.00 N/A 1.19 0.67 0.67 28.5 0.02 0.00 0.17 0.01 Shear, Moment, and Weight Summations: 0.39 0.25 11.70 1.22 Design Base Moment, M AASHTO = 27.13 ft-kips
Design Base Shear, V AASHTO = 1.24 kips
Design Base Torsion, T AASHTO = 0.25 ft-kips
Design Base Weight, WT AASHTO = 1.85 kips
Wind Loading Calculations - Sectorized Antennas and Mounts:

Factored Loads
Description
Wind Loading Calculations - Miscellaneous Appurtenances:

Factored Loads
Description
18" Ø x 80" Tall Antenna/Shroud Assy
LED Luminaire w/photocell
Wind Loading Summary - Factored Base Reactions:
8' Long (Max.) Luminaire Arm
Street Sign
CCI RF Notice Sign
Ph: (503) 587-0101 ; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 8
Access Port Information:

Port Width = 6.0 in. Number of Ports = 1
Port Height = 12.0 in.

C.L. Port = 14.0 in. (Above Base Plate)
Monopole Shaft Information:

Pole Diameter @ Port, D = 9.84 in. Wall Slenderness Ratio, l = D/t = 59.0 Design Wall Thickness, t = 0.1667 in. Plastic Design Slenderness Ratio, lp = 37.6 Yield Stress, FY = 55.0 ksi Limiting Slenderness Ratio, lMax = 400 Distance to Extreme Fiber, C = 4.92 in. Effective Section Modulus, Seff = 13.38 in3 Effective Yield Stress, F'Y = 68.2 ksi Effective Radius of Gyration, Reff = 3.51 in.

MP Shaft Section Properties at Access Ports:

Nominal Pipe Section: Reinforced Radio Port: X - X Axis: Y - Y Axis:

Mast Area, ANominal = 5.34 in2 Mast Area, AReinf = 3.87 in2 3.87 in2 Mom Of Inertia, INominal = 65.8 in4 Mom Of Inertia, IReinf = 54.02 in4 57.00 in4 Port Yield Stress, FY = 46 ksi Dist. to Extreme Fiber, Cx = 5.36 in. 5.51 in.

Design Flexural Strength: Effective Section Modulus, Seff = 9.8 in3 Compact Slenderness Ratio, lp = 37.6 Section Is Non-Compact Noncompact Slenderness Ratio, lr = 163 Nominal Flexural Strength, Mn = 37.58 ft-kips Factored Moment, MBP = 25.7 ft-kips Design Flexural Strength, fbMn = 33.8 ft-kips (OK) Design Compressive Strength:

Nominal Compressive Strength, Pn = F'Y * ANominal = 213 kips Factored Weight, WtBP = 2.36 kips Design Compressive Strength, fcPn = 191 kips (OK) Design Shear Strength:

Fnv = 33.0 ksi Nominal Shear Strength, Vn = Fnv * ANominal = 63.83 kips Factored Shear, VBP = 0.89 kips Design Shear Strength, fvVn = 57.45 kips (OK)

Design Torsional Strength:

USE: 10'' Diameter @ Base Tapering to 5.1'' Diameter @ Top

0.1793'' wall (7 GA. Min.), 8-Sharp Flute ASTM A595 Gr. A (Minimum FY = 55 ksi) Monopole Shaft Access Ports:

PORT EL. O.D. WIDTH (W) HT. (H) DEPTH (D) THKNS (T) PROJ. (P) QTY. AZI. 25'-6" - 4" 6" 1" 1/4" 3/8" 1 180˚
1'-6" - 6" 12" 1 3/4" 1/4" 1/4" 1 180˚

PORT DIMENSIONS
Stress Check - Monopole Shaft / Access Ports
Summary - Access Ports
Ph: (503) 588-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 9
Monopole Shaft Information:

Pole Diameter @ Base, DBase = 10.00 in. Mast Area, ANominal = 5.43 in2 Nominal Wall Thickness, t = 0.1793 in. Mom Of Inertia, INominal = 69.2 in4 Distance to Extreme Fiber, C = 5.00 in. Section Modulus, SModulus = 13.8 in3 Yield Stress, FY = 55.0 ksi Plastic Section Modulus, ZModulus = 15.6 in3 Wall Slenderness Ratio, l = D/t or b/t= 19.0 Average Radius of Gyration, RGyration = 2.65 in.

Design Flexural Strength: Section 5.8
Compact Slenderness Ratio, lp = 25.7 Use Plastic Design fb = 0.9 Noncompact Slenderness Ratio, lr = 35
Limiting Slenderness Ratio, lMax = 49 (OK)
Nominal Flexural Strength, Mn = 71.5 ft-kips Base Moment, MAASHTO = 27.13 ft-kips Design Flexural Strength, fbMn = 64.3 ft-kips (OK)
Design Compressive Strength: Section 5.10
Compact Slenderness Ratio, lp = 35 fc = 0.9
kL/r (k = 2.1) = 333.0 Q = 1.000
Euler's Buckling Stress = Fe = 2.58 ksi
Critical Buckling Stress = F cr = 2.26 ksi
Nominal Compressive Strength = Pn = Fcr*Ag = 12.3 kips Base Weight, Wt Base = 1.85 kips Design Compressive Strength = fcPn = Fcr*Ag = 11.1 kips (OK) Design Shear Strength: Section 5.11.2
Nominal Shear Stress Capacity = F nv = 33.0 ksi fv = 0.9 Shear Area = Av = 2.72 in2
Nominal Shear Strength = Vn = 89.7 kips Applied Shear Load, VAASHTO = 1.24 kips Design Shear Strength = fvVn = Fnv * Av = 80.7 kips (OK) Design Torsion Strength: Section 5.11.3
Torsional Constant, Ct = 22.7 in ft = 0.95
Nominal Torsion Stress Capacity , F nt = 33.00 ksi
Nominal Torsion Strength, Tn = Fnt * Ct = 62.3 kip-ft Applied Torsion Load, TAASHTO = 0.25 ft-kips Design Torsion Strength, ftTn = Fnt * Ct = 59.2 ft-kips (OK) Combined Force Interaction: Section 5.12.1
Mom Of Inertia @ T.O. Pole, IT = 8.71 in4 Mom Of Inertia @ B.O. Pole, IB = 69.19 in4 Factored Vertical Load, PT = 1.22 kips Factored Weight, D P = 0.63 kips Pequivalent = (IB/IT)1/3*PT + 0.38*Dp = 2.67 kips PEuler bottom = π2*E*IB/(k*L)2 = 25.46 kips Coefficient for Amplification, B = B 2 = 1 ≥ 1.0
Pu / fcPn + B*Mu / fbMn + [ |Vu / fvVn| + |Tu / frTn| ]2 = 0.59 (OK) USE: 10'' OD x 0.1793'' wall, A53/A500 Gr B Monopole Shaft Stress Check - Monopole Shaft @ Base

AASHTO LRFD
Ph: (503) 588-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 10
No. of Anchor Bolts, n = 4 Yield Strength, Fy_AB = 55.0 ksi A.B. Gross Area, Ag = 0.79 in2 AB Diameter, DAB = 1.00 in. Tensile Strength, Fu_AB = 75.0 ksi A.B. Tensile Stress Area, An = 0.61 in2 AB Circle, DBC = 14.0 in. Base Plate Width, WBP = 14.0 in. A.B. Plastic Modulus, Zar = 0.04 in3 AB Length, LAB = 48.0 in. Pole Diameter, Dpole = 10.00 in. Dist. Btwn Concr. & Lvl'g Nut, Iar = 1.00 in.

Factored Base Reactions:
αMpole = 25.73 ft-kips
αVpole = 0.87 kips
αTpole = 0.03 ft-kips
αWtpole = 2.36 kips
Factored Compressive Force per bolt:

Puc = [4 * αMPole / (n * DB.C.)] + αWtpole / n = 22.6 kips Factored Tensile Force per bolt:

Put = [4 * αMPole / (n * DB.C.)] - αWtpole / n = 21.5 kips Factored Shear Force per bolt:

Vu = αVpole / n + αTpole / ((n * DBC) / 2) = 0.23 kips Anchor Bolt Moment
Mu_ab = 0.65 * Vu * Iar = 0.15 in-kips
Design Anchor Bolt Strengths:

Design Tensile Strength, ftRnt_AB = ft * Fu_AB * An = 34.1 kips ft = fv = 0.75 Design Compressive Strength, fcRnc_AB = fc * Fy_AB * An = 33.3 kips fc = 1.00 Design Shear Rupture Strength, fvRnv_AB = fv * 0.5 * Fu_AB * Ag = 22.1 kips Design Shear Yield Strength, fcRnvc_AB = fc * 0.6 * Fy_AB * An/2 = 10.0 kips Design Flexural Strength, ffMn_AB = ff * Fy_AB * Z = 1.84 in-kips ff = 0.90 Combined Shear & Tension Interaction Check: Anchor Rod Moment Interaction Equations N/A [|Put / ØtRnt_AB|]2 + [Vu / ØvRnv_AB ]2
= 0.40 < 1.00 - (OK)
|Puc / ØcRnc_AB| + [Vu / ØcRnvc_AB ]2
= 0.68 < 1.00 - (OK)
Factored Base Plate Loading: BP Yield Strength, Fy_BP = 36.0 ksi BP Bending, MPlate = Put * a = 42.9 in.-kips
Design Base Plate Bending Strength, b = length of x'-x' = 9.8 in. fFB_BP = 0.90 * Fy_BP = 32.4 ksi a = (DBC - DPole)/2 = 2 in.

Minimum Base Plate thickness:
tmin = [4 * Mplate / (b * f FB_BP)]½ = 0.735 inches
Use: (4) - 1'' Ø x 48'' Long, Grade 55 Anchor Bolts on a 14'' Ø B.C. Structural Usage = 68.0% Use: 1" Thick by 14" Square, Grade 36 Base Plate Structural Usage = 85.8% Base Plate-to-Pole Shaft weld Design:

Minimum weld size per ANSI/AWS d1.1, Table 5.8, Low-Hydrogen process = 1/8 inch Upper Weld Size, wt = 0.313 in. Weld Tensile Strength, Fweld = 70.0 ksi (E70XX) Lower Weld Size, wb = 0.000 in. Design Weld Strength, fFw = 31.5 ksi Distance to Centroid of Upper Weld, Ltw = Dpole/2 + wt/3 = 5.10 inches Distance to Centroid of Lower Weld, Lbw = Dpole/2 - wt/3 = 5.00 inches Section Modulus of Upper Weld, Stw = 0.707 * wt * p * Ltw 2 = 18.1 in.3
Section Modulus of Lower Weld, Slw = 0.707 * wb * p * Lbw 2 = 0.0 in.3
Total Weld Area, Aweld = 7.1 in.2
Required Weld Strength, fw = Mpole/SSw + Wtpole/Aweld = 18.34 ksi (OK) Use: Partial Penetration Weld 1/16" Beveled Weld with 5/16" Cover Fillet All Around Anchor Bolt & Base Plate Data:

Failure across x'-x', modeled as
fixed-end cantilevered beam.

Anchor Bolt Design Per ANSI/TIA 222-H, Section 4.9.9
Base Plate Design Per ANSI/TIA 222-H, Section 4.7
Section A-A
VPole
MPole
a
TMax
DPole
WBP
DBC
A
A
x'
x'
Ph: (503) 588-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 11
No. of Anchor Bolts, n = 4 Weld Tensile Strength, Fweld = 70.0 ksi (E70XX) AB Diameter, DAB = 1.00 in. Upper Weld Size, wt = 0.313 in.

AB Circle, DBC = 14.0 in. Lower Weld Size, wb = 0.313 in.

AB Length, LAB = 48.0 in.

Yield Strength, Fy_AB = 55.0 ksi
Tensile Strength, Fu_AB = 75.0 ksi a = (DBC - DPole)/2 = 2 in.

A.B. Gross Area, Ag = 0.79 in2 b = length of x'-x' = 9.8 in.

Base Plate Width, W BP = 14.0 in.

BP Yield Strength, Fy_BP = 36.0 ksi
Pole Diameter, Dpole = 10.00 in.

Maximum Base Reactions:
αMpole = 27.13 ft-kips αTpole = 0.25 ft-kips
αVpole = 1.24 kips αWtpole = 1.85 kips
Maximum Tensile Stress per bolt:
αft = {[4 * αMPole / (n * DB.C.)] - αWtpole / n} = 22.8 kips Maximum Shear Stress per bolt:
αfv = (αVpole + 2 * αTpole / DBC) / n = 0.42 kips
Design Anchor Bolt Tensile Stress:
ft = 0.75 ftFt_AB = 0.75 * Fu_AB * An= 33.1 kips
Design Anchor Bolt Shear Stress:
fv = 0.75 fvFv_AB = 0.75 *0.4 * Fu_AB * Ag = 17.7 kips
Combined Shear & Tension Interaction Check:
[(αfv / Fv_AB)2 + (αft / Ft_AB)2] = 0.47 < 1.00 - (OK)
Base Plate:

Factored Base Plate Loading:

BP Bending, MPlate = αft * a = 45.6 kips
Design Base Plate Bending Stress:
fFb_AB = 0.9 * Fy_AB = 32.4 in.-kips
Minimum Base Plate thickness:
f = 0.90 tmin=[4 * MPlate/(b * f FB_BP)]½ = 0.758 inches Use: (4) - 1'' Ø Grade 55 Anchor Bolts on a 14'' Ø B.C. Structural Usage = 47.5% Use: 1" Thick by 14" Square, Grade 36 Base Plate Structural Usage = 75.8% Base Plate-to-Pole Shaft weld Design:

Minimum weld size per ANSI/AWS d1.1, Table 5.8, Low-Hydrogen process = 1/8 inch Design Weld Strength, fFw = 31.5 ksi
Total Weld Area, Aweld = 13.9 in.2 Distance to Centroid of Upper Weld, L tw = Dpole/2 + wt/3 = 5.10 inches Distance to Centroid of Lower Weld, L bw = Dpole/2 - wt/3 = 4.90 inches Section Modulus of Lower Weld, S lw = 0.707 * wb * p * Lbw 2 = 16.6 in.3
Section Modulus of Upper Weld, S tw = 0.707 * wt * p * Ltw 2 = 18.1 in.3
Required Weld Strength, fw = Mpole/SSw + Wtpole/Aweld = 9.51 ksi (OK) Use: Partial Penetration Weld 1/16" Beveled Weld with 5/16" Cover Fillet All Around Anchor Bolt & Base Plate Analysis with Code Result:

Anchor Bolt & Base Plate Data:

AASHTO LTS-6, Section 5.16.3
Section A-A
VPole
MPole
a
TMax
DPole
WBP
DBC
A
A
x'
x'
Ph: (503) 588-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 12
Factored Base Reactions from Wind Loading:

Mbase = 27.1 ft-kips
Vbase = 1.24 kips
Wtbase = 1.85 kips
Seismic Parameters :

Per 2019 CBC Section 1613, ASCE 7-16 Sections 15.1.3 & 12.8 & ANSI/TIA-222-H Site Classification = D Chapter 20, Table 20.3-1
Short-Period Spectral Acceleration, Ss = 2.113 g
1-Second Period Spectral Acceleration, S1 = 0.757 g
Seismic Shear Factors:

I = 1.00 Table 1.5-2 Location:

R = 1.50 Table 15.4-2
TL = 8 s, Annex B Fig. B-19
Fa = 1.20
Fv = 1.70
Seismic Design Classifications:

Occupancy Category: I I - IV, Table 1-1
Seismic Design Category: D A - F, Section 11.6
Seismic Base Shear (Nominal Value) Sec. 2.7.7.1
V = Cs * W = 1.73 kips
Cs = SDS / (R / I) = 1.127
SDS = (2 / 3) * SMS = 1.690
SMS = SS * Fa = 2.536
Seismic Base Shear (Need Not Exceed Value) Sec. 2.7.7.1 & Sec. 2.7.7.1.3.3 V = Cs * W = 0.87 kips
Cs  SD1 / [T * (R / I)] (for T  TL),  SD1 * TL * I / (T2 * R) (for T > TL) (for S1  0.2g, x 1.5) 0.565 SD1 = (2 / 3) * SM1 = 0.858
SM1 = S1 * Fv = 1.287
T = 1 / f1 = 1 / (1 / (2π) * (3 * E * Iavg * g / (Lp * (Wu + 0.236 * WL)))1/2) = 1.52 Seconds E = 29000 ksi Wu= 0.817 kips
Iavg = (Itop+Ibot)/2 = 37.25 in4 WL = 0.721 kips
Lp= 420 in Wt = 1.54 kips
g = 386 in/s2
Seismic Base Shear (Minimum Value) Sec. 2.7.7.1
V = Cs * W = 0.11 kips
Cs = 0.044 * SDS * I = 0.074 ≥ 0.03
Seismic Base Shear (Minimum Value, S 1 ≥ 0.6g) Sec. 2.7.7.1 V = Cs * W = 0.62 kips
Cs = 0.8 * S1 / (R / I)] = 0.404
Vertical Seismic Load Effect Sec. 2.7.6
Total Seismic Vertical Load Effect = E v = 0.2*S DS * W = 0.52 kips Total Seismic Shear = 0.87 kips
Total Wind Shear = 1.24 kips
Seismic Base Shear Calculations
Design Base Shear is Governed by Wind Loading
Values for S1, Ss, Fa, and Fv obtained from ASCE 7 online Hazard Tool based on ASCE 7-16 (Based on the location indicated above).

Southern CA
Vwind
- vs -
Vseismic
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light PoleDate: 08/27/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 13
Factored Monopole Base Reactions:
aMbase = Overturning Moment = 27.1 ft-kips
aVbase = Base Shear = 1.24 kips
aWtbase = Base Weight = 1.85 kips
Design Basis:

1. Ref. 2019 CBC Section 1807.3.2.1, Nonconstrained Condition

2. ACI 318-14 - Requirements for Reinforced Concrete.

3. Soil Design Values: Per 2019 CBC, Table1806.2, Class 5 Material Soil Characteristics:

Based on 2019 CBC Soil Classification for Type: 5 (1 - 5) fRp = Nominal Lateral Bearing at 1' below grade = 150 psf/ft dnegl = Depth of soil below grade neglected = 0.00 ft.

Drilled Pier Characteristics:

Minimum Diameter:

Dtempl = OD of AB Template = 15.6 in.

Sb = Minimum AB and Rebar Separation = 0.75 in.

Concrete Cover = Ccover = 3.00 in.

Dp_min = Dtempl + 2*(Sb + db + dties + Ccover)= 24.0 in.

Use Dp = Pier Diameter = 24.0 in.

Minimum Length/Depth:

Ch = Pier Projection AGL = 0.00 ft.

S1 = 2 * φRp * (Lp-dnegl) / 3 = 800 psf; Where (Lp-dnegl)  12 ft.

A = 2.34*Vpole / (S1*Dp) = 1.82
Lp_min = A/2 * [1 + (1 + 4.36*h/A)½] + dnegl = 7.55 ft.

Use: Lp = Below Grade Pier Length = 8.00 ft.

Ltot = Total Length of Pier = 8.00 ft.

Total Volume of Concrete Required = 0.9 cu. yds.

Drilled Pier Foundation Design
Circular Tie
Dp
Vertical Rebar
Vpole
Dp
Ch
Lp
Mpole
Wt pole
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light PoleDate: 08/27/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 14
Reinforcement:

Vertical Reinforcement Parameters:

Vertical Bar Size = 6 Tie Bar Size = 4
Qty of Vertical Bars = 6 f'c = 4.0 ksi
db = Diameter of Bar = 0.75 in. fy = 60.0 ksi
As = Total Area of Vert. Bars = 2.65 sq. in.

Pier Moment Capacity: Verify Mult ≤ ØM n
Mult = 1.3*[Mpole+Vpole*(Lp/3+dnegl)]= 39.6 ft-kips
ØMn = 99 ft-kips (OK)
Asmin = 4*Mult / Ø*fy*N*Dp = 0.2443 sq. in.
rprov = As / (p/4 * Dp
2) = 0.0059
rmin = 0.0050 (OK)
Vertical Bar Development Length:

Ldb = [0.04*db*fy / f'c
½] * Mult / ØMn = 11.38 in.

Ldb_prov'd = 36.9 in. (OK)
Shear Reinforcement:

Factored Shear, Vu = 1.4 * Vpole = 1.25 kips
Horizontal Tie Shear Capacity, Vs = 76.8 kips ACI 318 Equation 22.5.10.5.3 Concrete Shear Capacity, Vc = 55.7 kips ACI 318 Table 22.5.5.1 Total Shear Capacity, ØVc + ØVs = 99 kips (OK)
Dtie = Diameter of Tie = 18 '' Ø
Reinforcement Summary:

Vertical Bars: 6 - #6 x 7.5 ft. Long A615 Gr. 60 Deformed Vertical Bars Spaced evenly (approx. 8.1'' o.c.) within Horizontal Ties Horizontal Ties: 13 - #4 Horizontal Ties , 18 in. Diameter, with 24 in. lap Spaced at 6'' o.c. along the anchor bolts and 12'' o.c. in remainder of pier Rebar Weights: Vertical Bars = 68 pounds
Horizontal Ties = 59 pounds
Horizontal Tie Length = 6' - 10''
Drilled Pier Foundation Design
45°
Ldb
Circular Tie 24"
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 15
Factored Monopole Base Reactions:

Mbase= Overturning Moment = 27.1 ft-kips
Vbase= Base Shear = 1.24 kips
Wtpole = Base Weight = 1.85 kips
Design Basis:

1. Ref. 2019 CBC IBC Section 1807.3.2.1, Nonconstrained Condition

2. ACI 318-14 - Requirements for Reinforced Concrete.

3. Soils Design: Per 2019 CBC, Table1806.2, Class 5 Material Soil Characteristics:

Based on IBC Soil Classification for Type: 5 (1 - 5)
fRp = Nominal Lateral Bearing at 1' below grade = 150 psf/ft dnegl = Depth of soil below grade neglected = 0.00 ft.

Drilled Pier Characteristics:

Minimum Diameter:

Dpole = 10.75 in.

Minimum Cover = Ccover = 3.00 in.

Dp_min = Dpole + 2 * Ccover = 16.8 in.

Use Dp = Minimum Pier Diameter = 18.0 in.

Minimum Length/Depth:

Ch = Embed Projection AGL = 0.00 ft.

S1 = 2 * fRp * (Lp-dnegl) / 3 = 1000 psf; Where (Lp-dnegl)  12 ft.

A = 2.34*Vpole / (S1*Dp) = 1.94
Lp_min = A/2 * [1 + (1 + 4.36*h/A)½] + dnegl = 7.83 ft.

Use: Lp = Below Grade Pier Length = 10.00 ft.

Ltot = Total Length of Embed = 10.00 ft.

Total Volume of Concrete or Backfill Required = 0.42 cu. yds.

Optional Direct Burial Backfill Foundation Design
Mpole
Wt pole
Vpole
Dp
Lp
Ch
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light PoleDate: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 16
Factored Base Reactions:

Overturning Moment, aMpole = 27.1 ft-kips
Base Shear, aVpole = 1.24 kips
Base Weight, aWtpole = 1.85 kips
Design Basis:

1. Soils investigation report performed by:

Per 2019 CBC, Table1806.2, Class 5 Material

2. American Concrete Institute, ACI 318-14.

Design Parameters:

Slab Dimensions:

Slab Width, bslab = 5.25 ft. Pocket Width, wp = 2.00 ft.

Slab Thickness, tslab = 3.00 ft. Weight of Slab, Wt slab = 15.5 kips Pocket Depth, dp = 0.83 ft. Volume of Concrete, Volconc = 3.2 cu yds Nominal Soil Resistance Values: Resistance Factors:

Bearing Resistance, Rs_Brg = 4,000 lbs/sq ft Bearing Resistance Factor, fs = 0.75 Lateral Resistance, Rs_Lat = 300 lbs/sq ft/ft Lateral Resistance Factor, fs = 0.75 Soil Density, gsoil = 100 lbs/cu ft
Slab Overturning Stability:

Moment Acting @ Toe of Slab:
aMtoe = OTM + V * tslab = 31 ft-kips
Resisting Moment @ Toe of Slab:
fMR = (Wtpole + Wtslab) * (bslab / 2) = 45 ft-kips
Overturning Factor of Safety = M R /M toe = 1.47 > 1.11 (OK) Bearing Pressure Calculations:

Eccentricity, e = M toe / (Wt pole + Wt slab ) = 1.78 > 0.88 (OK) Contact Length, L c = 3 * (b slab / 2 - e) = 2.5 ft
Factored Gross Bearing:
qmax = (Wtpole + Wtslab) / (½ * Lc * bslab) = 2.61 ksf/ft Required Bearing Strength:
qnet = qgross - tslab * gsoil = 2.31 ksf/ft
Maximum Bearing Strength:
fs R s_Brg = 3.00 ksf (OK)
USE: 5.25 ft. Square x 3.00 ft. Thick Slab Min.

Alternative Slab Foundation Design
V
M
pole
pole
poleWt
pd
tslab
slabb
w p
slabb
L c
m axq
Toe
L c
e
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light PoleDate: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 17
Slab Reinforcement Details:

Top mat rebar size: 6 Top mat Quantity: 8 fy = 60.0 ksi Bott. mat rebar size: 6 Bott. mat Quantity: 8 f'c = 3.0 ksi As_top= 3.5 in2 As_bott= 3.5 in2 d = 31.9 in
Check Minimum Horizontal Reinforcement Ratios:
rmin = 200/fy = 0.0033 Need More Steel3/4rbal = 0.0170 (OK) rtemp/shrink = 0.0018 (OK)
rtotal_prov'd = (A s_top + A s_bot ) / A g = 0.0031 NG Analysis of One-Way Beam Shear:

Pressure Slope = qmax / Lc = 1.030 klf
Lcant = ½ * bslab = 2.63 ft
q' = qmax - (qmax / Lc) * Lcant = -0.096 ksf
Analysis of Cantilever Loads:

Factored Moment:
aMu = [(q' * Lcant
2 * ½ + (qmax - q') * ½ * 2/3 * Lcant
2) * bslab + aMpole] = 31 ft-kips
Reinforcement Ratio of lower rebar mat:
rbott = As_bott / (bslab * tslab) = 0.0016 (OK)
Nominal Moment Strength:
fMn = 0.9 * As * Fy * [d - (As * Fy) / (1.3 * f'c * bslab)] = 493 ft-kips (OK) Factored Shear:
aVu = [q' * Lcant + ½ * (qmax - q') * Lcant] * bslab = 17 kips Nominal Shear Strength of Concrete:
fVc = 0.75 * 2 * f'c
½ * bslab * d = 165 kips (Vs not req'd)
Top Rebar Mat:

USE: #6 A615 Gr. 60 Bars 4.75 ft. long, Spaced at 8.2 in. c-c for top rebar mat Bottom Rebar Mat:

USE: #6 A615 Gr. 60 Bars 4.75 ft. long, Spaced at 8.2 in. c-c for bottom rebar mat Slab Foundation Design (Cont.)
Toe
m axq
C.L. cap
q'
uM
cantL
cantL
slabb
L c
slabb
Region Contributing
to 1-Way Beam
Shear
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 20 ft. (Max. Ht.) Slim-Line Antenna Poles Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 18
Anchor Bolt Pocket Reinforcement Details:

Reinforcement Details:

L (Vertical) rebar size: 5 Quantity of Verticals: 4 As_cap = 1.23 sq in Shear Tie rebar size: 4 Spacing of Ties, s = 6 in Av_cap = 0.39 sq in / tie Pocket Width, wp = 2.00 ft. d' = 18.0 in
Reinforcement Dimensions:

L-bar length = Lhb = (Ch + tslab) - 6" = 40.0 in
Z-bar hook length = 12 * db = 7.50 in
Circular Shear Tie Size = Cs - 6" = 18.0 in
Minimum Reinforcement Ratios, r = (A s_total / A g_concr ) rmin = 200/fy = 0.0033 (OK) ¾rbal = 0.0170 (OK)
rtemp/shrink = 0.0018 (OK)
Total Provided Reinforcement Ratio : rtotal_prov'd = 0.0076 (As_cap / Ag) Factored Moment in Pocket:
aMu = Vpole * (tslab + ½ * dp) = 4 ft-kips
Nominal Moment Strength:
fMn = 0.9*(½*As_cap*fy*[d'-(As_cap*fy)/(1.3*f'c*Cs)]+Mn_AB) = 48 ft-kips (OK) Factored Shear in Pocket:

Vu = Vtwr = 1.2 kips
Nominal Shear Strength:
fVs = 0.75 * (Av_cap * fy * d') / s = 53 kips (OK)
Vertical Reinforcement for Pocket:

USE: 4 - # 5 L-bars 40 in. long, with a 7.5 in. long hook Anchor Bolt Confining Shear Reinforcement:

USE: 6 - # 4 Horizontal Ties 18 in. Ø, spaced at 6 in. on center Slab Foundation Design (Cont.)
Circular Tie 24"
L
3"Ø Bend
hb12db
L-Bar Dim ensions
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered 8-Sharp Fluted Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 15
Factored Monopole Base Reactions:

Mbase= Overturning Moment = 27.1 ft-kips
Vbase= Base Shear = 1.24 kips
Wtpole = Base Weight = 1.85 kips
Design Basis:

1. Ref. 2019 CBC Section 1807.3.2.2, Constrained Condition

2. ACI 318-14 - Requirements for Reinforced Concrete.

3. Soils Design: Per 2019 CBC, Table1806.2, Class 5 Material Soil Characteristics:

Based on IBC Soil Classification for Type: 5 (1 - 5)
fRp = Nominal Lateral Bearing at 1' below grade = 150 psf/ft dnegl = Depth of soil below grade neglected = 1.00 ft.

Drilled Pier Characteristics:

Minimum Diameter:

Dpole = 10.75 in.

Minimum Cover = Ccover = 3.00 in.

Dp_min = Dpole + 2 * Ccover = 16.8 in.

Use Dp = Minimum Pier Diameter = 18.0 in.

Minimum Length/Depth:

Ch = Embed Projection AGL = 0.00 ft.

S3 = 2 * fRp * (Lp-dnegl) = 1500 psf; Where (Lp-dnegl)  12 ft.

Lp_min = (4.25 * Mpole / (S3 * b))½ + dnegl = 8.16 ft.

Use: Lp = Below Grade Pier Length = 6.00 ft.

Ltot = Total Length of Embed = 6.00 ft.

Total Volume of Concrete or Backfill Required = 0.25 cu. yds.

Optional Direct Burial Backfill Foundation Design
Mpole
Wt pole
Vpole
Dp
Lp
Ch
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com 11-Nov-22
DESIGN SUMMARY:

Western UT Project No.: 22-0170
Dated:

November 11, 2022
Revision A: Added Design Summary to Cover.

Structural Calculations
with Foundation Design
For A:

Located At:
35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole
Prepared for:

Various Nodes in Southern CA
Los Angeles County
Crown Castle
The calculations contained within this document represent customer specified antenna and equipment loading used to design the pole structure that is structurally adequate to accommodate the loading in accordance with all industry standards and local building codes. 5032 Salem-Dallas Highway NW, Salem, OR 97304
Phone: (503) 587-0101; Fax: (503) 316-1864
www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com

Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 11/11/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA
Loading, Codes, and Materials: Design Loading Page 1
Design Criteria
Codes and Specifications
Materials
Design Calculations: Per ANSI/TIA 222-H - Wind Load Case: Page 2 - 3 Wind Pressure
Antenna/Appurtenance Wind Loading
Base Reactions
Design Calculations: Per AASHTO LRFD LTS-1- Wind Load Case: Page 6 - 7 Wind Pressure
Monopole Shaft Wind Loading
Antenna/Appurtenance Wind Loading
Base Reactions
Monopole Shaft Stress Check: Per ANSI/TIA 222-H Page 8 Monopole Shaft Stress Check: Per AASHTO LRFD LTS-1 Page 9 Anchor Bolt, Base Plate & Weld Design: Per ANSI/TIA 222-H Page 10 Anchor Bolt, Base Plate & Weld Design: Per AASHTO LRFD LTS-1 Page 11 Seismic Base Shear Comparision: Page 12
Drilled Pier Foundation Design: Page 13 - 14
Optional Diirect Embed Section Foundation Design: Page 15 Alternative Slab Foundation Design: Page 16 -18

Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 8/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 1
Design Loading:

Pole Shaft: ASTM A595 Gr. A or A1011 HLSA Gr. 55 (Minimum FY = 55 ksi) Baseplate: ASTM A36
Ports: ASTM A500 Gr. B
Plates: ASTM A36
Welds: E70XX Electrodes
Structural Bolts: ASTM F3125 Gr. A325
Anchor Bolts: ASTM F1554 Gr. 55
Rebar: ASTM A615 Gr. 60
Coatings:

Galvanizing: ASTM A123
Loading, Codes, and Materials
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 8/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page No.: 2
Reference: ANSI/TIA-222-H, Section 2.6.11.6 Velocity Pressure, qz = 0.00256 * K z * K zt * K e * K d * V 2 Where:

1.46 10.55 0.179 2.92 0.00 2.6 76.2 0.61 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.3 1.10 20.1 0.032 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.058

4.38 10.14 0.179 2.92 2.92 2.46 73.2 0.64 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.3 1.10 20.1 0.032 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.15 0.056

7.29 9.73 0.179 2.92 5.83 2.36 70.3 0.67 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.3 1.10 20.1 0.032 0.23 0.23 0.03 0.24 0.053

10.21 9.32 0.179 2.92 8.75 2.27 67.3 0.70 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.3 1.10 20.1 0.032 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.32 0.051

13.13 8.91 0.179 2.92 11.7 2.17 64.4 0.73 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.3 1.10 20.1 0.032 0.42 0.42 0.03 0.39 0.049

16.04 8.50 0.179 2.92 14.6 2.07 61.8 0.76 0.86 1.00 0.95 1.00 18.5 1.10 20.4 0.032 0.51 0.51 0.03 0.45 0.047

18.96 8.10 0.179 2.92 17.5 1.97 59.9 0.78 0.89 1.00 0.95 1.00 19.2 1.10 21.1 0.032 0.61 0.61 0.03 0.51 0.044

21.88 7.69 0.179 2.92 20.4 1.87 57.7 0.81 0.92 1.00 0.95 1.00 19.7 1.10 21.7 0.033 0.72 0.72 0.03 0.56 0.042

24.79 7.28 0.179 2.92 23.3 1.77 55.4 0.84 0.94 1.00 0.95 1.00 20.3 1.10 22.3 0.033 0.83 0.83 0.02 0.59 0.040

27.71 6.87 0.179 2.92 26.3 1.67 52.9 0.88 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 20.8 1.10 22.8 0.034 0.93 0.93 0.02 0.63 0.037

30.63 6.46 0.179 2.92 29.2 1.57 50.3 0.93 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 21.2 1.10 23.3 0.034 1.04 1.04 0.02 0.65 0.035

33.54 6.05 0.179 2.92 32.1 1.47 47.6 0.98 1.01 1.00 0.95 1.00 21.6 1.10 23.8 0.034 1.15 1.15 0.02 0.67 0.033 Loading Summations: 0.391 6.96 6.96 0.33 5.19 0.54
Overall Length of Pole = 35.00 feet
Base Elevation of Pole = 0.00 feet (AGL)
Top of Steel Elevation = 35.00 feet (AGL)

1.45 1.46
EPAS

1.58 1.58

1.58 1.57

1.54 1.51

1.49 1.48 Effective Section
Area
(Square Feet)
Wind Loading Calculations: Monopole Shaft
Shaft Section Properties Section Area Wind Pressure Wind Loading Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 8/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 3
CL Elevation (feet)
Offset from Shaft
C.L. (in.)
Quantity Per
Sector
Weight
(lbs)
Height
(inches)
Width
(inches)
Depth
(inches)
Shielding Factor
Ka
Ca Calc
(Normal)
Ca Calc
(Transverse)
(EPA)N
(ft2)
(EPA)T
(ft2)
(EPA)A
(ft2)
Unfactored Wind
Pressure (psf)
Factored Vwind
(kips)
Factored Wind
Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mwind
(ft-kips)
Vseismic
(kips)
Factored Seismic
Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mseismic
(ft-kips)
Factored
Total Wt
(kips)
Shear, Moment, and Weight Summations: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CL Elevation (feet)
Offset from Shaft
C.L. (in.)
Quantity
Weight
(lbs)
Shape
Round (R) or
Flat (F)
Height
(inches)
Width
(inches)
Area Factor
AA
(ft2)
Aspect Ratio
(Height / Width)
C
Ca
CaAA
(ft2)
ΣCaAA
(ft2)
Factored Wind
Pressure (psf)
Factored Vwind
(kips)
Factored Wind
Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mwind
(ft-kips)
Vseismic
(kips)
Factored Seismic
Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mseismic
(ft-kips)
Factored
Total Wt
(kips)

38.5 0.0 1 850.0 R 84.0 18.0 1.00 10.50 4.67 143 0.55 5.76 5.76 22.2 0.128 0.00 4.93 0.51 0.00 19.78 1.02

35.0 0.0 2 20.0 F 6.4 22.1 1.00 0.98 3.45 N/A 1.24 1.22 2.44 21.8 0.053 0.00 1.86 0.02 0.00 0.85 0.05

32.5 0.0 2 45.0 R 2.4 96.0 1.00 1.58 40.42 752 0.60 0.95 1.90 21.5 0.041 0.00 1.33 0.05 0.00 1.77 0.11

11.0 20.0 1 30.0 F 9.0 36.0 1.00 2.25 4.00 N/A 1.27 2.85 2.85 18.3 0.052 0.09 0.57 0.02 0.03 0.20 0.04

9.0 2.0 1 6.0 F 9.0 9.0 1.00 0.56 1.00 N/A 1.20 0.68 0.68 18.3 0.012 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 Shear, Moment, and Weight Summations: 0.29 0.09 8.80 0.61 0.03 22.63 1.22 Design Base Moment, M base = 16.7 ft-kips : MShaft + Mappurtenance + MPΔ Design Base Moment, M base = 27.82 ft-kips : MShaft + Mappurtenance + MPΔ Design Base Shear, V base = 0.68 kips : VShaft + VAppurtenance Design Base Shear, V base = 0.94 kips : VShaft + VAppurtenance Design Base Torsion, T base = 0.09 kips : TShaft + TAppurtenance Design Base Torsion, T base = 0.03 ft-kips : TShaft + TAppurtenance Design Base Weight, WT base = 1.87 kips : WtShaft + WtAppurtenance Design Base Weight, WT base = 2.40 kips : WtShaft + WtAppurtenance Description
18" Ø x 80" Tall Antenna/Shroud Assy
LED Luminaire w/photocell
8' Long (Max.) Luminaire Arm
Description
For Load Combination: 1.2D + 1.0E V + 1.0 E h :For Load Combination: 1.2D + 1.0W o :

Seismic Loading Summary - Factored Base Reactions: Wind Loading Summary - Factored Base Reactions:

Wind Loading Calculations - Sectorized Antennas and Mounts:

Factored Loads
CCI RF Notice Sign
Street Sign
Wind Loading Calculations - Miscellaneous Appurtenances:

Factored Loads
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 8/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page No.: 6
Reference: AASHTO LRFD-LTS-1, 2015 (w/ 2017 Interim Revs), Sec. 3 Design Wind Pressure, P z = 0.00256 * K z * K d * G * V 2 Where:

1.46 10.55 0.179 2.92 0.00 2.56 96.7 0.45 0.85 0.95 1.00 25.0 1.14 28.5 0.033 0.033 0.05 0.05 0.06

4.38 10.14 0.179 2.92 2.92 2.46 92.9 0.45 0.85 0.95 1.00 25.0 1.14 28.5 0.032 0.032 0.14 0.14 0.06

7.29 9.73 0.179 2.92 5.8 2.36 89.2 0.45 0.85 0.95 1.00 25.0 1.14 28.5 0.030 0.030 0.22 0.22 0.05

10.21 9.32 0.179 2.92 8.8 2.27 85.4 0.45 0.85 0.95 1.00 25.0 1.14 28.5 0.029 0.029 0.30 0.30 0.05

13.13 8.91 0.179 2.92 11.7 2.17 81.7 0.45 0.85 0.95 1.00 25.0 1.14 28.5 0.028 0.028 0.36 0.36 0.05

16.04 8.50 0.179 2.92 14.6 2.07 78.0 0.45 0.86 0.95 1.00 25.3 1.14 28.9 0.027 0.027 0.43 0.43 0.05

18.96 8.10 0.179 2.92 17.5 1.97 74.2 0.48 0.89 0.95 1.00 26.2 1.14 29.9 0.028 0.028 0.53 0.53 0.04

21.88 7.69 0.179 2.92 20.4 1.87 70.5 0.51 0.92 0.95 1.00 27.0 1.14 30.8 0.029 0.029 0.64 0.64 0.04

24.79 7.28 0.179 2.92 23.3 1.77 66.7 0.55 0.94 0.95 1.00 27.8 1.14 31.7 0.031 0.031 0.76 0.76 0.04

27.71 6.87 0.179 2.92 26.3 1.67 63.0 0.59 0.97 0.95 1.00 28.4 1.14 32.4 0.032 0.032 0.89 0.89 0.04

30.63 6.46 0.179 2.92 29.2 1.57 59.2 0.64 0.99 0.95 1.00 29.0 1.14 33.1 0.033 0.033 1.02 1.02 0.04

33.54 6.05 0.179 2.92 32.1 1.47 55.5 0.70 1.01 0.95 1.00 29.6 1.14 33.7 0.035 0.035 1.16 1.16 0.03 Loading Summations: 0.37 0.37 6.50 6.50 0.54
Overall Length of Pole = 35.00 feet Deflection at Top of Pole = 10.76 inches Base Elevation of Pole = 0.00 feet (AGL) Sway at Top of Pole = 1.47 degrees Top of Steel Elevation = 35.00 feet (AGL) Moment Due to P-D Effects = 1.11 ft-kips Wind Loading Calculations: Monopole Shaft
Shaft Section Properties Section Area Wind Pressure Wind Loading Effective Section
Area
(Square Feet)
EPAS

1.15 1.11

1.06 1.02

0.97 0.93

0.94 0.95

0.97 0.99

1.01 1.03
Ph: (503) 587-0101 ; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 8/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 7
CL Elevation (feet)
Offset from Shaft
C.L. (in.)
Quantity Per
Sector
Weight
(lbs)
Height
(inches)
Width
(inches)
Depth
(inches)
Shielding Factor
Ka
Ca Calc
(Normal)
Ca Calc
(Transverse)
(EPA)N
(ft2)
(EPA)T
(ft2)
(EPA)A
(ft2)
Wind Pressure
(psf)
Factored Vwind
(kips)
Factored Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mwind
(ft-kips)
Factored
Total Wt
(kips)
Shear, Moment, and Weight Summations: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CL Elevation (feet)
Offset from Shaft
C.L. (in.)
Quantity
Weight
(lbs)
Shape
Round (R) or
Flat (F)
Height
(inches)
Width
(inches)
Area Factor
AA
(ft2)
Aspect Ratio
(Height / Width)
CvVd
Wind Drag
Coefficient, Cd
CdAA
(ft2)
ΣCaAA
(ft2)
Wind Pressure
(psf)
Factored Vwind
(kips)
Factored Torque
(ft-kips)
Factored Mwind
(ft-kips)
Factored
Total Wt
(kips)

38.5 0.0 1 850 R 84.0 18.0 1.00 10.50 4.67 165 0.45 4.73 4.73 34.7 0.16 0.04 6.32 1.02

35.0 0.0 2 20 F 6.4 22.1 1.00 0.98 3.45 N/A 1.20 1.18 2.36 34.0 0.08 0.02 2.81 0.05

32.5 0.0 2 45 R 2.4 96.0 1.00 1.58 40.42 880 0.45 0.71 1.43 33.5 0.05 0.06 1.55 0.11

11.0 20.0 1 30 F 9.0 36.0 1.00 2.25 4.00 N/A 1.20 2.70 2.70 28.5 0.08 0.13 0.85 0.04

9.0 2.0 1 6 F 9.0 9.0 1.00 0.56 1.00 N/A 1.19 0.67 0.67 28.5 0.02 0.00 0.17 0.01 Shear, Moment, and Weight Summations: 0.39 0.25 11.70 1.22 Design Base Moment, M AASHTO = 19.31 ft-kips
Design Base Shear, V AASHTO = 0.75 kips
Design Base Torsion, T AASHTO = 0.25 ft-kips
Design Base Weight, WT AASHTO = 1.87 kips
Wind Loading Calculations - Sectorized Antennas and Mounts:

Factored Loads
Description
Wind Loading Calculations - Miscellaneous Appurtenances:

Factored Loads
Description
18" Ø x 80" Tall Antenna/Shroud Assy
LED Luminaire w/photocell
Wind Loading Summary - Factored Base Reactions:
8' Long (Max.) Luminaire Arm
Street Sign
CCI RF Notice Sign
Ph: (503) 587-0101 ; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 8
Access Port Information:

Port Width = 6.0 in. Number of Ports = 1
Port Height = 12.0 in.

C.L. Port = 14.0 in. (Above Base Plate)
Monopole Shaft Information:

Pole Diameter @ Port, D = 10.59 in. Wall Slenderness Ratio, l = D/t = 63.5 Design Wall Thickness, t = 0.1667 in. Plastic Design Slenderness Ratio, lp = 37.6 Yield Stress, FY = 55.0 ksi Limiting Slenderness Ratio, lMax = 400 Distance to Extreme Fiber, C = 5.29 in. Effective Section Modulus, Seff = 13.95 in3 Effective Yield Stress, F'Y = 55.0 ksi Effective Radius of Gyration, Reff = 3.68 in.

MP Shaft Section Properties at Access Ports:

Nominal Pipe Section: Reinforced Radio Port: X - X Axis: Y - Y Axis:

Mast Area, ANominal = 5.46 in2 Mast Area, AReinf = 3.87 in2 3.87 in2 Mom Of Inertia, INominal = 73.8 in4 Mom Of Inertia, IReinf = 54.02 in4 57.00 in4 Port Yield Stress, FY = 46 ksi Dist. to Extreme Fiber, Cx = 5.36 in. 5.51 in.

Design Flexural Strength: Effective Section Modulus, Seff = 9.8 in3 Compact Slenderness Ratio, lp = 37.6 Section Is Non-Compact Noncompact Slenderness Ratio, lr = 163 Nominal Flexural Strength, Mn = 37.58 ft-kips Factored Moment, MBP = 27.8 ft-kips Design Flexural Strength, fbMn = 33.8 ft-kips (OK) Design Compressive Strength:

Nominal Compressive Strength, Pn = F'Y * ANominal = 213 kips Factored Weight, WtBP = 2.40 kips Design Compressive Strength, fcPn = 191 kips (OK) Design Shear Strength:

Fnv = 33.0 ksi Nominal Shear Strength, Vn = Fnv * ANominal = 63.83 kips Factored Shear, VBP = 0.94 kips Design Shear Strength, fvVn = 57.45 kips (OK)

Design Torsional Strength:

USE: 10.75'' Diameter @ Base Tapering to 5.85'' Diameter @ Top

0.1793'' wall (7 GA. Min.), Tapered ASTM A595 Gr. A or A1011 HLSA Gr. 55 (Minimum FY = 55 ksi) Monopole Shaft Access Ports:

PORT EL. O.D. WIDTH (W) HT. (H) DEPTH (D) THKNS (T) PROJ. (P) QTY. AZI. 1'-6" - 6" 12" 1 3/4" 1/4" 1/4" 1 180˚

PORT DIMENSIONS
Stress Check - Monopole Shaft / Access Ports
Summary - Access Ports
Ph: (503) 588-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 9
Monopole Shaft Information:

Pole Diameter @ Base, DBase = 10.75 in. Mast Area, ANominal = 5.54 in2 Nominal Wall Thickness, t = 0.1793 in. Mom Of Inertia, INominal = 77.4 in4 Distance to Extreme Fiber, C = 5.38 in. Section Modulus, SModulus = 14.4 in3 Yield Stress, FY = 55.0 ksi Plastic Section Modulus, ZModulus = 18.1 in3 Wall Slenderness Ratio, l = D/t or b/t= 60.0 Average Radius of Gyration, RGyration = 2.84 in.

Design Flexural Strength: Section 5.8
Compact Slenderness Ratio, lp = 36.9 Section Is Non-Compact fb = 0.9 Noncompact Slenderness Ratio, lr = 163
Limiting Slenderness Ratio, lMax = 237 (OK)
Nominal Flexural Strength, Mn = 75.6 ft-kips Base Moment, MAASHTO = 19.31 ft-kips Design Flexural Strength, fbMn = 68.0 ft-kips (OK)
Design Compressive Strength: Section 5.10
Compact Slenderness Ratio, lp = 58 fc = 0.9
kL/r (k = 2.1) = 310.5 Q = 1.000
Euler's Buckling Stress = Fe = 2.97 ksi
Critical Buckling Stress = F cr = 2.60 ksi
Nominal Compressive Strength = Pn = Fcr*Ag = 14.4 kips Base Weight, Wt Base = 1.87 kips Design Compressive Strength = fcPn = Fcr*Ag = 13.0 kips (OK) Design Shear Strength: Section 5.11.2
Nominal Shear Stress Capacity = F nv = 33.0 ksi fv = 0.9 Shear Area = Av = 2.77 in2
Nominal Shear Strength = Vn = 91.5 kips Applied Shear Load, VAASHTO = 0.75 kips Design Shear Strength = fvVn = Fnv * Av = 82.3 kips (OK) Design Torsion Strength: Section 5.11.3
Torsional Constant, Ct = 31.5 in ft = 0.95
Nominal Torsion Stress Capacity , F nt = 33.00 ksi
Nominal Torsion Strength, Tn = Fnt * Ct = 86.5 kip-ft Applied Torsion Load, TAASHTO = 0.25 ft-kips Design Torsion Strength, ftTn = Fnt * Ct = 82.2 ft-kips (OK) Combined Force Interaction: Section 5.12.1
Mom Of Inertia @ T.O. Pole, IT = 11.95 in4 Mom Of Inertia @ B.O. Pole, IB = 77.37 in4 Factored Vertical Load, PT = 1.22 kips Factored Weight, D P = 0.65 kips Pequivalent = (IB/IT)1/3*PT + 0.38*Dp = 2.52 kips PEuler bottom = π2*E*IB/(k*L)2 = 28.47 kips Coefficient for Amplification, B = B 2 = 1 ≥ 1.0
Pu / fcPn + B*Mu / fbMn + [ |Vu / fvVn| + |Tu / frTn| ]2 = 0.43 (OK) USE: 10.75'' OD x 0.1793'' wall, A53/A500 Gr B Monopole Shaft Stress Check - Monopole Shaft @ Base

AASHTO LRFD
Ph: (503) 588-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 10
No. of Anchor Bolts, n = 4 Yield Strength, Fy_AB = 55.0 ksi A.B. Gross Area, Ag = 0.79 in2 AB Diameter, DAB = 1.00 in. Tensile Strength, Fu_AB = 75.0 ksi A.B. Tensile Stress Area, An = 0.61 in2 AB Circle, DBC = 14.0 in. Base Plate Width, WBP = 14.0 in. A.B. Plastic Modulus, Zar = 0.04 in3 AB Length, LAB = 48.0 in. Pole Diameter, Dpole = 10.75 in. Dist. Btwn Concr. & Lvl'g Nut, Iar = 1.00 in.

Factored Base Reactions:
αMpole = 27.82 ft-kips
αVpole = 0.94 kips
αTpole = 0.03 ft-kips
αWtpole = 2.40 kips
Factored Compressive Force per bolt:

Puc = [4 * αMPole / (n * DB.C.)] + αWtpole / n = 24.4 kips Factored Tensile Force per bolt:

Put = [4 * αMPole / (n * DB.C.)] - αWtpole / n = 23.2 kips Factored Shear Force per bolt:

Vu = αVpole / n + αTpole / ((n * DBC) / 2) = 0.25 kips Anchor Bolt Moment
Mu_ab = 0.65 * Vu * Iar = 0.16 in-kips
Design Anchor Bolt Strengths:

Design Tensile Strength, ftRnt_AB = ft * Fu_AB * An = 34.1 kips ft = fv = 0.75 Design Compressive Strength, fcRnc_AB = fc * Fy_AB * An = 33.3 kips fc = 1.00 Design Shear Rupture Strength, fvRnv_AB = fv * 0.5 * Fu_AB * Ag = 22.1 kips Design Shear Yield Strength, fcRnvc_AB = fc * 0.6 * Fy_AB * An/2 = 10.0 kips Design Flexural Strength, ffMn_AB = ff * Fy_AB * Z = 1.84 in-kips ff = 0.90 Combined Shear & Tension Interaction Check: Anchor Rod Moment Interaction Equations N/A [|Put / ØtRnt_AB|]2 + [Vu / ØvRnv_AB ]2
= 0.47 < 1.00 - (OK)
|Puc / ØcRnc_AB| + [Vu / ØcRnvc_AB ]2
= 0.73 < 1.00 - (OK)
Factored Base Plate Loading: BP Yield Strength, Fy_BP = 36.0 ksi BP Bending, MPlate = Put * a = 37.8 in.-kips
Design Base Plate Bending Strength, b = length of x'-x' = 9 in. fFB_BP = 0.90 * Fy_BP = 32.4 ksi a = (DBC - DPole)/2 = 1.63 in.

Minimum Base Plate thickness:
tmin = [4 * Mplate / (b * f FB_BP)]½ = 0.718 inches
Use: (4) - 1'' Ø x 48'' Long, Grade 55 Anchor Bolts on a 14'' Ø B.C. Structural Usage = 73.4% Use: 1" Thick by 14" Square, Grade 36 Base Plate Structural Usage = 84.7% Base Plate-to-Pole Shaft weld Design:

Minimum weld size per ANSI/AWS d1.1, Table 5.8, Low-Hydrogen process = 1/8 inch Upper Weld Size, wt = 0.313 in. Weld Tensile Strength, Fweld = 70.0 ksi (E70XX) Lower Weld Size, wb = 0.000 in. Design Weld Strength, fFw = 31.5 ksi Distance to Centroid of Upper Weld, Ltw = Dpole/2 + wt/3 = 5.48 inches Distance to Centroid of Lower Weld, Lbw = Dpole/2 - wt/3 = 5.38 inches Section Modulus of Upper Weld, Stw = 0.707 * wt * p * Ltw 2 = 20.8 in.3
Section Modulus of Lower Weld, Slw = 0.707 * wb * p * Lbw 2 = 0.0 in.3
Total Weld Area, Aweld = 7.6 in.2
Required Weld Strength, fw = Mpole/SSw + Wtpole/Aweld = 16.33 ksi (OK) Use: Partial Penetration Weld 1/16" Beveled Weld with 5/16" Cover Fillet All Around Anchor Bolt & Base Plate Data:

Failure across x'-x', modeled as
fixed-end cantilevered beam.

Anchor Bolt Design Per ANSI/TIA 222-H, Section 4.9.9
Base Plate Design Per ANSI/TIA 222-H, Section 4.7
Section A-A
VPole
MPole
a
TMax
DPole
WBP
DBC
A
A
x'
x'
Ph: (503) 588-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 11
No. of Anchor Bolts, n = 4 Weld Tensile Strength, Fweld = 70.0 ksi (E70XX) AB Diameter, DAB = 1.00 in. Upper Weld Size, wt = 0.313 in.

AB Circle, DBC = 14.0 in. Lower Weld Size, wb = 0.313 in.

AB Length, LAB = 48.0 in.

Yield Strength, Fy_AB = 55.0 ksi
Tensile Strength, Fu_AB = 75.0 ksi a = (DBC - DPole)/2 = 1.63 in.

A.B. Gross Area, Ag = 0.79 in2 b = length of x'-x' = 9 in.

Base Plate Width, W BP = 14.0 in.

BP Yield Strength, Fy_BP = 36.0 ksi
Pole Diameter, Dpole = 10.75 in.

Maximum Base Reactions:
αMpole = 19.31 ft-kips αTpole = 0.25 ft-kips
αVpole = 0.94 kips αWtpole = 1.87 kips
Maximum Tensile Stress per bolt:
αft = {[4 * αMPole / (n * DB.C.)] - αWtpole / n} = 16.1 kips Maximum Shear Stress per bolt:
αfv = (αVpole + 2 * αTpole / DBC) / n = 0.34 kips
Design Anchor Bolt Tensile Stress:
ft = 0.75 ftFt_AB = 0.75 * Fu_AB * An= 33.1 kips
Design Anchor Bolt Shear Stress:
fv = 0.75 fvFv_AB = 0.75 *0.4 * Fu_AB * Ag = 17.7 kips
Combined Shear & Tension Interaction Check:
[(αfv / Fv_AB)2 + (αft / Ft_AB)2] = 0.24 < 1.00 - (OK)
Base Plate:

Factored Base Plate Loading:

BP Bending, MPlate = αft * a = 26.1 kips
Design Base Plate Bending Stress:
fFb_AB = 0.9 * Fy_AB = 32.4 in.-kips
Minimum Base Plate thickness:
f = 0.90 tmin=[4 * MPlate/(b * f FB_BP)]½ = 0.597 inches Use: (4) - 1'' Ø Grade 55 Anchor Bolts on a 14'' Ø B.C. Structural Usage = 23.6% Use: 1" Thick by 14" Square, Grade 36 Base Plate Structural Usage = 59.7% Base Plate-to-Pole Shaft weld Design:

Minimum weld size per ANSI/AWS d1.1, Table 5.8, Low-Hydrogen process = 1/8 inch Design Weld Strength, fFw = 31.5 ksi
Total Weld Area, Aweld = 14.9 in.2 Distance to Centroid of Upper Weld, L tw = Dpole/2 + wt/3 = 5.48 inches Distance to Centroid of Lower Weld, L bw = Dpole/2 - wt/3 = 5.27 inches Section Modulus of Lower Weld, S lw = 0.707 * wb * p * Lbw 2 = 19.3 in.3
Section Modulus of Upper Weld, S tw = 0.707 * wt * p * Ltw 2 = 20.8 in.3
Required Weld Strength, fw = Mpole/SSw + Wtpole/Aweld = 5.90 ksi (OK) Use: Partial Penetration Weld 1/16" Beveled Weld with 5/16" Cover Fillet All Around Anchor Bolt & Base Plate Analysis with Code Result:

Anchor Bolt & Base Plate Data:

AASHTO LTS-6, Section 5.16.3
Section A-A
VPole
MPole
a
TMax
DPole
WBP
DBC
A
A
x'
x'
Ph: (503) 588-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 12
Factored Base Reactions from Wind Loading:

Mbase = 19.3 ft-kips
Vbase = 0.75 kips
Wtbase = 1.87 kips
Seismic Parameters :

I = 1.00 Table 1.5-2 Location:

R = 1.50 Table 15.4-2
TL = 8 s, Annex B Fig. B-19
Fa = 1.20
Fv = 1.70
Seismic Design Classifications:

Occupancy Category: I I - IV, Table 1-1
Seismic Design Category: D A - F, Section 11.6
Seismic Base Shear (Nominal Value) Sec. 2.7.7.1
V = Cs * W = 1.76 kips
Cs = SDS / (R / I) = 1.127
SDS = (2 / 3) * SMS = 1.690
SMS = SS * Fa = 2.536
Seismic Base Shear (Need Not Exceed Value) Sec. 2.7.7.1 & Sec. 2.7.7.1.3.3 V = Cs * W = 0.94 kips
Cs  SD1 / [T * (R / I)] (for T  TL),  SD1 * TL * I / (T2 * R) (for T > TL) (for S1  0.2g, x 1.5) 0.604 SD1 = (2 / 3) * SM1 = 0.858
SM1 = S1 * Fv = 1.287
T = 1 / f1 = 1 / (1 / (2π) * (3 * E * Iavg * g / (Lp * (Wu + 0.236 * WL)))1/2) = 1.42 Seconds E = 29000 ksi Wu= 0.817 kips
Iavg = (Itop+Ibot)/2 = 42.90 in4 WL = 0.744 kips
Lp= 420 in Wt = 1.56 kips
g = 386 in/s2
Seismic Base Shear (Minimum Value) Sec. 2.7.7.1
V = Cs * W = 0.12 kips
Cs = 0.044 * SDS * I = 0.074 ≥ 0.03
Seismic Base Shear (Minimum Value, S 1 ≥ 0.6g) Sec. 2.7.7.1 V = Cs * W = 0.63 kips
Cs = 0.8 * S1 / (R / I)] = 0.404
Vertical Seismic Load Effect Sec. 2.7.6
Total Seismic Vertical Load Effect = E v = 0.2*S DS * W = 0.53 kips Total Seismic Shear = 0.94 kips
Total Wind Shear = 0.75 kips
Seismic Base Shear Calculations
Design Base Shear is Governed by Seismic Loading
Values for S1, Ss, Fa, and Fv obtained from ASCE 7 online Hazard Tool based on ASCE 7-16 (Based on the location indicated above).

Southern CA
Vwind
- vs -
Vseismic
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light PoleDate: 08/27/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 13
Factored Monopole Base Reactions:
aMbase = Overturning Moment = 27.8 ft-kips
aVbase = Base Shear = 0.94 kips
aWtbase = Base Weight = 2.40 kips
Design Basis:

1. Ref. 2019 CBC Section 1807.3.2.1, Nonconstrained Condition

2. ACI 318-14 - Requirements for Reinforced Concrete.

3. Soil Design Values: Per 2019 CBC, Table1806.2, Class 5 Material Soil Characteristics:

Based on 2019 CBC Soil Classification for Type: 5 (1 - 5) fRp = Nominal Lateral Bearing at 1' below grade = 150 psf/ft dnegl = Depth of soil below grade neglected = 0.00 ft.

Drilled Pier Characteristics:

Minimum Diameter:

Dtempl = OD of AB Template = 15.6 in.

Sb = Minimum AB and Rebar Separation = 0.75 in.

Concrete Cover = Ccover = 3.00 in.

Dp_min = Dtempl + 2*(Sb + db + dties + Ccover)= 24.0 in.

Use Dp = Pier Diameter = 24.0 in.

Minimum Length/Depth:

Ch = Pier Projection AGL = 0.00 ft.

S1 = 2 * φRp * (Lp-dnegl) / 3 = 800 psf; Where (Lp-dnegl)  12 ft.

A = 2.34*Vpole / (S1*Dp) = 1.38
Lp_min = A/2 * [1 + (1 + 4.36*h/A)½] + dnegl = 7.38 ft.

Use: Lp = Below Grade Pier Length = 8.00 ft.

Ltot = Total Length of Pier = 8.00 ft.

Total Volume of Concrete Required = 0.9 cu. yds.

Drilled Pier Foundation Design
Circular Tie
Dp
Vertical Rebar
Vpole
Dp
Ch
Lp
Mpole
Wt pole
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/27/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 14
Reinforcement:

Vertical Reinforcement Parameters:

Vertical Bar Size = 6 Tie Bar Size = 4
Qty of Vertical Bars = 6 f'c = 4.0 ksi
db = Diameter of Bar = 0.75 in. fy = 60.0 ksi
As = Total Area of Vert. Bars = 2.65 sq. in.

Pier Moment Capacity: Verify Mult ≤ ØM n
Mult = 1.3*[Mpole+Vpole*(Lp/3+dnegl)]= 39.4 ft-kips
ØMn = 99 ft-kips (OK)
Asmin = 4*Mult / Ø*fy*N*Dp = 0.2434 sq. in.
rprov = As / (p/4 * Dp
2) = 0.0059
rmin = 0.0050 (OK)
Vertical Bar Development Length:

Ldb = [0.04*db*fy / f'c
½] * Mult / ØMn = 11.34 in.

Ldb_prov'd = 36.9 in. (OK)
Shear Reinforcement:

Factored Shear, Vu = 1.4 * Vpole = 0.95 kips
Horizontal Tie Shear Capacity, Vs = 76.8 kips ACI 318 Equation 22.5.10.5.3 Concrete Shear Capacity, Vc = 55.6 kips ACI 318 Table 22.5.5.1 Total Shear Capacity, ØVc + ØVs = 99 kips (OK)
Dtie = Diameter of Tie = 18 '' Ø
Reinforcement Summary:

Vertical Bars: 6 - #6 x 7.5 ft. Long A615 Gr. 60 Deformed Vertical Bars Spaced evenly (approx. 8.1'' o.c.) within Horizontal Ties Horizontal Ties: 13 - #4 Horizontal Ties , 18 in. Diameter, with 24 in. lap Spaced at 6'' o.c. along the anchor bolts and 12'' o.c. in remainder of pier Rebar Weights: Vertical Bars = 68 pounds
Horizontal Ties = 59 pounds
Horizontal Tie Length = 6' - 10''
Drilled Pier Foundation Design
45°
Ldb
Circular Tie 24"
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 15
Factored Monopole Base Reactions:

Mbase= Overturning Moment = 27.8 ft-kips
Vbase= Base Shear = 0.94 kips
Wtpole = Base Weight = 2.40 kips
Design Basis:

1. Ref. 2019 CBC IBC Section 1807.3.2.1, Nonconstrained Condition

2. ACI 318-14 - Requirements for Reinforced Concrete.

3. Soils Design: Per 2019 CBC, Table1806.2, Class 5 Material Soil Characteristics:

Based on IBC Soil Classification for Type: 5 (1 - 5)
fRp = Nominal Lateral Bearing at 1' below grade = 150 psf/ft dnegl = Depth of soil below grade neglected = 0.00 ft.

Drilled Pier Characteristics:

Minimum Diameter:

Dpole = 10.75 in.

Minimum Cover = Ccover = 3.00 in.

Dp_min = Dpole + 2 * Ccover = 16.8 in.

Use Dp = Minimum Pier Diameter = 18.0 in.

Minimum Length/Depth:

Ch = Embed Projection AGL = 0.00 ft.

S1 = 2 * fRp * (Lp-dnegl) / 3 = 1000 psf; Where (Lp-dnegl)  12 ft.

A = 2.34*Vpole / (S1*Dp) = 1.47
Lp_min = A/2 * [1 + (1 + 4.36*h/A)½] + dnegl = 7.65 ft.

Use: Lp = Below Grade Pier Length = 10.00 ft.

Ltot = Total Length of Embed = 10.00 ft.

Total Volume of Concrete or Backfill Required = 0.42 cu. yds.

Optional Direct Burial Backfill Foundation Design
Mpole
Wt pole
Vpole
Dp
Lp
Ch
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 16
Factored Base Reactions:

Overturning Moment, aMpole = 27.8 ft-kips
Base Shear, aVpole = 0.94 kips
Base Weight, aWtpole = 2.40 kips
Design Basis:

1. Soils investigation report performed by:

Per 2019 CBC, Table1806.2, Class 5 Material

2. American Concrete Institute, ACI 318-14.

Design Parameters:

Slab Dimensions:

Slab Width, bslab = 5.25 ft. Pocket Width, wp = 2.00 ft.

Slab Thickness, tslab = 3.00 ft. Weight of Slab, Wt slab = 15.5 kips Pocket Depth, dp = 0.83 ft. Volume of Concrete, Volconc = 3.2 cu yds Nominal Soil Resistance Values: Resistance Factors:

Moment Acting @ Toe of Slab:
aMtoe = OTM + V * tslab = 31 ft-kips
Resisting Moment @ Toe of Slab:
fMR = (Wtpole + Wtslab) * (bslab / 2) = 47 ft-kips
Overturning Factor of Safety = M R /M toe = 1.53 > 1.11 (OK) Bearing Pressure Calculations:

Eccentricity, e = M toe / (Wt pole + Wt slab ) = 1.71 > 0.88 (OK) Contact Length, L c = 3 * (b slab / 2 - e) = 2.7 ft
Factored Gross Bearing:
qmax = (Wtpole + Wtslab) / (½ * Lc * bslab) = 2.49 ksf/ft Required Bearing Strength:
qnet = qgross - tslab * gsoil = 2.19 ksf/ft
Maximum Bearing Strength:
fs R s_Brg = 3.00 ksf (OK)
USE: 5.25 ft. Square x 3.00 ft. Thick Slab Min.

Alternative Slab Foundation Design
V
M
pole
pole
poleWt
pd
tslab
slabb
w p
slabb
L c
m axq
Toe
L c
e
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 17
Slab Reinforcement Details:

Pressure Slope = qmax / Lc = 0.911 klf
Lcant = ½ * bslab = 2.63 ft
q' = qmax - (qmax / Lc) * Lcant = 0.100 ksf
Analysis of Cantilever Loads:

Factored Moment:
aMu = [(q' * Lcant
2 * ½ + (qmax - q') * ½ * 2/3 * Lcant
2) * bslab + aMpole] = 31 ft-kips
Reinforcement Ratio of lower rebar mat:
rbott = As_bott / (bslab * tslab) = 0.0016 (OK)
Nominal Moment Strength:
fMn = 0.9 * As * Fy * [d - (As * Fy) / (1.3 * f'c * bslab)] = 493 ft-kips (OK) Factored Shear:
aVu = [q' * Lcant + ½ * (qmax - q') * Lcant] * bslab = 18 kips Nominal Shear Strength of Concrete:
fVc = 0.75 * 2 * f'c
½ * bslab * d = 165 kips (Vs not req'd)
Top Rebar Mat:

USE: #6 A615 Gr. 60 Bars 4.75 ft. long, Spaced at 8.2 in. c-c for top rebar mat Bottom Rebar Mat:

Reinforcement Details:

L-bar length = Lhb = (Ch + tslab) - 6" = 40.0 in
Z-bar hook length = 12 * db = 7.50 in
Circular Shear Tie Size = Cs - 6" = 18.0 in
Minimum Reinforcement Ratios, r = (A s_total / A g_concr ) rmin = 200/fy = 0.0033 (OK) ¾rbal = 0.0170 (OK)
rtemp/shrink = 0.0018 (OK)
Total Provided Reinforcement Ratio : rtotal_prov'd = 0.0076 (As_cap / Ag) Factored Moment in Pocket:
aMu = Vpole * (tslab + ½ * dp) = 3 ft-kips
Nominal Moment Strength:
fMn = 0.9*(½*As_cap*fy*[d'-(As_cap*fy)/(1.3*f'c*Cs)]+Mn_AB) = 48 ft-kips (OK) Factored Shear in Pocket:

Vu = Vtwr = 0.9 kips
Nominal Shear Strength:
fVs = 0.75 * (Av_cap * fy * d') / s = 53 kips (OK)
Vertical Reinforcement in Slab:

Vertical Reinforcement for Pocket:

USE: 4 - # 5 L-bars 40 in. long, with a 7.5 in. long hook Anchor Bolt Confining Shear Reinforcement:

USE: 6 - # 4 Horizontal Ties 18 in. Ø, spaced at 6 in. on center Slab Foundation Design (Cont.)
Circular Tie 24"
L
3"Ø Bend
hb12db
L-Bar Dim ensions
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Customer: Crown Castle Project No.: 22-0170
Project: 35' Tall, Tapered Round Antenna Light Pole Date: 08/30/22 Site: Various Nodes in Southern CA Page: 15
Factored Monopole Base Reactions:

Mbase= Overturning Moment = 27.8 ft-kips
Vbase= Base Shear = 0.94 kips
Wtpole = Base Weight = 1.87 kips
Design Basis:

1. Ref. 2019 CBC Section 1807.3.2.2, Constrained Condition

2. ACI 318-14 - Requirements for Reinforced Concrete.

3. Soils Design: Per 2019 CBC, Table1806.2, Class 5 Material Soil Characteristics:

Based on IBC Soil Classification for Type: 5 (1 - 5)
fRp = Nominal Lateral Bearing at 1' below grade = 150 psf/ft dnegl = Depth of soil below grade neglected = 1.00 ft.

Drilled Pier Characteristics:

Minimum Diameter:

Dpole = 10.75 in.

Minimum Cover = Ccover = 3.00 in.

Dp_min = Dpole + 2 * Ccover = 16.8 in.

Use Dp = Minimum Pier Diameter = 18.0 in.

Minimum Length/Depth:

Ch = Embed Projection AGL = 0.00 ft.

S3 = 2 * fRp * (Lp-dnegl) = 1500 psf; Where (Lp-dnegl)  12 ft.

Lp_min = (4.25 * Mpole / (S3 * b))½ + dnegl = 8.25 ft.

Use: Lp = Below Grade Pier Length = 6.00 ft.

Ltot = Total Length of Embed = 6.00 ft.

Total Volume of Concrete or Backfill Required = 0.25 cu. yds.

Optional Direct Burial Backfill Foundation Design
Mpole
Wt pole
Vpole
Dp
Lp
Ch
Ph: (503) 587-0101; Fx: (503) 316-1864 www.WesternUtilityTelecom.com Version August 26, 2019 Page 1 of 18

APPLICATION FORM FOR A WIRELESS UTILITY PERMIT

TO PLACE FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY

INSTRUCTIONS:

Persons applying for a wireless encroachment permit under the City of Culver City Municipal Code (the “Code”) for the installation and operation of wireless facilities in the public right-of-way must fill out this application form and submit two (2) physical copies (with all necessary information and documentation) and one electronic copy (with all necessary information and documentation) on a flash drive. All application materials should be submitted in person to the following location:

City of Culver City – Department of Public Works/Engineering Division 9770 Culver Blvd.

Culver City, CA 90232

Applications and resubmittals may only be submitted on Mondays and Tuesdays between 8:00 am and 4:00 pm. Please make an appointment to submit your application by calling 310-253-5600.

For additional information regarding application requirements and all other requirements, please review Chapter 11.20 and Section 11.20.065 of the Code and visit the Public Works Telecommunications Utility Permit webpage at:
www.culvercity.org/wireless. For questions, contact the Department of Public Works/Engineering Division at 310-253-5600. If your response to a question includes attachments, label the attachments with exhibit numbers that reflect the Part and Question number to which the exhibit corresponds. As examples: for information requested in Part A, Question 5.a), label the corresponding exhibit as “Exhibit A(5)(a)”; for information requested in Part C, Question 2.a).i, label the corresponding exhibit as “Exhibit C(2)(a)(i)”.

PART A: BASIC INFORMATION (ALL APPLICANTS)

Version August 26, 2019 Page 2 of 18

1. Contact Information

a) The applicant shall submit and maintain current at all times basic contact information set forth below. The applicant shall notify City of any changes to any of this information within fifteen (15) calendar days following any such change. This information shall include the following:

i) The identity, including name, company, address, email, and telephone number of the applicant: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________;

ii) The identity, including name, address, email, and telephone number of the owner of the proposed wireless facility, including official identification numbers and FCC certifications and, if different from the owner, the identity of the person or entity responsible for operating the proposed wireless facility: ______________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________;

iii) If the owner of the structure on which the proposed wireless facility would be installed is different than (ii) above, the identity, including name, address, email, and telephone number of the owner of the structure:
____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________;

iv) Name, address, email, and telephone number of a local contact person for emergencies: _________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________.

2. Purpose of Wireless Facility
Is the proposed wireless communications facility to be used for the provision of “personal wireless services” as defined by 47 U.S.C. Section 332(c)(7)(C)(i) on a sole or comingled basis?

 No. Specify the type(s) of wireless communications services to be provided using the proposed facility: __________________________________________________.

 Yes. Specify the type(s) of personal wireless services:_____________________ ___________________________________________________________________.

Version August 26, 2019 Page 3 of 18

3. Type of Application
Please check the applicable box(es) and provide the information required below as an attachment to this Application, along with a written explanation identifying the facts relied upon to support the claimed treatment.
 Eligible Facilities Requests. Applicant asserts that the application qualifies as an “eligible facilities request” (EFR) (as defined in 47 CFR § 1.6100(b)(3), or any successor provision). Applicant shall submit the information required in the Application Requirements Part C, Section 1 below. The applicable FCC shot clock is sixty (60) days.

 Collocation – Small Cell Facility (Existing Structure). Applicant asserts that the application is being submitted for approval of a Collocation of a Small Wireless Facility, that is, the proposed facility both meets the definition of “small wireless facility” and is a “collocation” (both as defined by 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002).

Replacements of existing structures are not ““collocations”. Applicant shall submit the information required in Part B and the Application Requirements Part C, Section 3 below. The applicable FCC shot clock is sixty (60) days.

 Small Cell Facility (New Structure). Applicant asserts that the application is being submitted for approval to deploy a Small Wireless Facility (as defined by 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(l)) involving placement of a new structure. Replacements of existing structures are considered new structures. Applicant shall submit the information required in Part B and the Application Requirements Part C, Section 3 below. The applicable FCC shot clock is ninety (90) days.

 Other Wireless Facility Expressly Permitted by State or Federal Law to be in the ROW. Applicant asserts that the application is being submitted for approval of a type of wireless services facility that applicable state or federal laws expressly permit to be in the City’s public rights-of-way. If you checked this box, please attach an explanation of the basis for your assertion, including citations to supporting law, and state what FCC shot clock you assert applies to this application, if any. Submit the information required in the Application Requirements Part C, Section 3 below. Also, complete Part B if you answered yes to Part A, Question 2.

 Permit Renewal. Applicant asserts that the application is being submitted for a renewal of an existing wireless encroachment permit or predecessor permit. If you checked this box, please submit a copy of the original permit, any prior renewals or extensions thereof, and the information required in the Application Requirements Section Part C(2) below.

Also check the following Waiver Request box if applicable to your application.

Version August 26, 2019 Page 4 of 18

 Waiver Request. Applicant asserts that its application includes a waiver request.

Applicant shall include a request for a waiver, as set forth in Section

11.20.065(F)(5) of the Code, and any additional information required in the Application Requirements Part C, Section 4 below. A request for waiver may be submitted at a later time if it is determined that the proposed facility, as originally submitted, will not meet the requirements and restrictions of the Code.

4. Application Fees

Applicant shall pay all applicable fees in the amounts established by the current fee schedule. In the event applicant has pre-paid all or a portion of applicable fees, please include a copy of the receipt from that transaction.

5. Franchises, Authorizations and Licenses

To have a complete application, the applicant must have: (a) authorization to use the public rights-of-way; (b) licenses to provide proposed services; and (c) authorization to use the proposed structure.

a) Does applicant have an existing franchise or other authorization to place wireless facilities in the public rights-of-way?
 No.

If no, the application will be considered incomplete.
 Yes.

If yes, explain source of applicant’s right to use the public rights-of-way and submit related documentation.

b) Has applicant obtained all applicable licenses or other authorizations to provide the services proposed in connection with the application, whether required by the Federal Communications Commission, California Public Utilities Commission, or any other agency with authority over the proposed services.  No.
 Yes.

If yes, submit related documentation such as FCC licenses or authorizations, a certificate of public convenience and necessity or a wireless identification registration (WIR) from the California Public Utilities Commission.

c) Is proposed wireless facility to be attached to a structure owned or controlled by a party other than the owner of the proposed wireless facility?  No.
 Yes.

If yes, identify the owner as one of the following:

Version August 26, 2019 Page 5 of 18

 The City.
 Other: _________________(insert name).

If you selected Other, provide a copy of the authorization or license to use the structure.

If you selected the City, select one of the following:
 I have a General Terms and Conditions master license or other agreement with the City for use of the facility. [If you check this box, provide the document.]
 I have no license or other agreement, but I am applying/have applied for one. [If you check this box, the application for a license or agreement must be provided, along with payment or proof of payment of required fees.]  I have no license or other agreement, and have not applied for a license or other agreement. By checking this box and signing below, you acknowledge and agree that the wireless encroachment permit that is the subject of this application is not a substitute for a license or other agreement to use any City facility, that such license or agreement must be separately applied for and that this wireless encroachment permit application will remain incomplete until the necessary license or other agreement has been approved by the City.

Agreed: ______________________________
PART B: PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICES FACILITIES (RESPOND IF

APPLICABLE)

1. Based on the work proposed in connection with this project, identify any and all additional permits, approvals, or agreements (“Ancillary Permissions”) you contend must be issued (absent agreement) by the time the City must take action on this wireless application. It is the applicant’s responsibility to review Code, city policies and all state and federal regulations (including, but not limited to, FCC regulations) applicable to the deployment of this wireless facility and to thereby identify all Ancillary Permissions that will be needed before this project can be deployed. The applicant’s failure to conduct a thorough investigation and to identify all required Ancillary Permissions may be grounds for denying this application or for declaring it incomplete. For example, if the proposed wireless facility would be placed on a structure where historical review would be required, the applicant must identify the required historic review permit(s) here. Please identify all Ancillary Permissions that you contend will be required for your wireless project:

a) ___ Fiber Utility Permit
b) ___ Building Permit
c) ___ Electrical Permit
Version August 26, 2019 Page 6 of 18

d) ___ Traffic Control Permit
e) ___ Excavation Permit
f) ___ Historical Review Permit
g) ___ Other Permit(s). Identify: ________________

Alternatively, rather than identifying all Ancillary Permissions above, you may agree as follows by signing below: “I agree that, should this wireless application be granted, or granted subject to conditions, no work may be undertaken on the applied-for wireless facility until any required Ancillary Permissions which are not identified above have been applied for and obtained.”

Agreed: _______________________________

2. Please provide an attachment that identifies any Ancillary Permissions you identified in response to “1.” (above) and, with respect to each of those Ancillary Permissions, include the following completed checklist:
 I have the required permit. [If you check this box, attach the required permit.]  I don’t have this permit, but I am applying or have applied for one. [If you check this box, the application and all fees or proof of payment of all such fees must be provided.]
PART C: DETAILED APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (RESPOND TO RELEVANT

SECTIONS)

The information required to be included in your application is dependent upon whether it is an eligible facilities request, a renewal of an existing permit, or any other application type. Please reference the appropriate section below for your application type to read a detailed list of its requirements. Additionally, regardless of the application type, each applicant must demonstrate their adherence to the Design and Development Standards for Wireless Facilities in the Public Rights-of-Way that are adopted by Resolution of the City Council pursuant to Chapter 11.20.065.D.1 of the Code.

1. ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUESTS: For an application asserted to be an eligible facilities request, the application must provide the following information:

a) Location and Zoning Information

i) Location of the project site, including the nearest registered address, the names of the two nearest cross streets, GPS coordinates, and the present zone designation of the project site.
ii) If the facility is proposed to be attached to an existing pole, provide the pole number. (To obtain a City-owned streetlight pole Facility ID number and to determine its small cell site status visit: Streetlight Inventory Version August 26, 2019 Page 7 of 18

iii) Applicant shall include signed documentation indicating that applicant is the owner or is authorized by the owner of the structure and/or property to install and operate the proposed facility.

b) Description of the Proposed Project

i) A description of the proposed facility(ies), including whether the project is a collocated facility or the replacement, removal, or modification of an existing facility.
ii) A detailed explanation as to why applicant asserts that the facility constitutes an eligible facilities request, including reference to and analysis of applicable FCC rules as they pertain to the proposed facility. iii) A list of all facilities and equipment proposed to be installed and the dimensions, weight, and manufacturer’s specifications for each. iv) A description of the concealment elements, if any, associated with the facilities as they will be modified, including but not limited to painting, and shielding as modified. The showing should be sufficient to demonstrate that the modifications will not defeat any existing concealment elements.

If there will be no concealment elements, so state.
v) A description of any ground disturbance necessary to complete the proposed project.
vi) A description of the site and any deployment outside the site necessary to complete the proposed project.
vii) If a collocation, a description of why this installation qualifies as a collocation within the meaning of the FCC rules.
viii) A description of all changes made to the facility from the date of the original installation (whether or not approved) and a description of the changes in height since January 22, 2012.
ix) A description of all changes to be made to the existing base station and/or tower, including, among other things, identifying precisely what changes will be made to the supporting structure.

c) Prior Approvals/Permits

i) A copy of all approvals and/or permits for the tower or base station that is to be modified, and any subsequent modification approvals and/or permits, and of any required conditions (imposed by the City and/or third party) placed on the initial or subsequent approvals and/or permits. ii) A showing that the facility, as modified, will be in compliance with existing conditions of the underlying approval(s)/permit(s), whether or not it is in compliance with conditions as of the date of application. There must be a plan submitted for correction of any non-compliant condition.

Version August 26, 2019 Page 8 of 18

d) Site Plan

i) Three (3) copies of a facility site plan, at a scale of 1”=20’ or larger, and including the following:
(1) A north-pointing arrow on each plan sheet;
(2) Title block with applicant’s name, owner’s name, and contact information;
(3) Depiction of the fully-constructed proposed facility; (4) Location of lot lines, streets (with street names), easements, and all structures and improvements, including accessory equipment, underground utilities and support structures, existing and proposed; (5) Existing and proposed elevations of all facilities, equipment, support structures, appurtenances, and other related structures; (6) Slopes, contours, trees and other pertinent physical features of the site, existing and proposed;
(7) All exterior lighting on the site, existing and proposed; (8) As to the nearest structure located on any properties abutting the site on which you are proposing to install your wireless facility, the location and use of that structure as well as the distance from that structure to the property line of the site on which you are proposing to install your wireless facility; and
(9) The location of parking for maintenance personnel.

e) Site Photograph(s)

i) Current color photographs of the site and its surroundings.

f) Visual Impact Analysis

g) Noise

i) Operation of wireless facilities shall comply with the noise regulations set in Chapters 9.04 and 9.07 of the Code and the noise element of the General Plan. Demonstrate compliance by providing, among other relevant information, a description of the facilities and/or equipment within the applicant’s project that are expected to induce or generate noise, as well as anticipated noise levels of said facilities and/or equipment. For facilities that generate noise, please provide testing data for noise assuming maximum facility utilization and operational utilization (worst Version August 26, 2019 Page 9 of 18

case) 10 feet from the source. Specify times and conditions during which noise generation will occur.

h) FCC Radio Frequency Standards

i) A report signed by a California licensed professional engineer, with expertise in radio communications facilities and the calculation of radio frequency emissions, that affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the proposed installation will be compliant with the FCC’s standards. The report must also contain the following:
(1) A description of each of the proposed antennas and all related fixtures, structures, appurtenances and apparatus, including the height above grade, volume in total cubic feet, materials, lighting, and the directionality of each antenna (e.g., omni, directional, etc.); (2) The frequency, modulation and class of service;
(3) A clear identification of areas, both vertically and horizontally, where exposure levels will exceed FCC standards for general public and occupational exposures. Please note that applicant’s analysis must show that it has appropriately taken cumulative exposures into account, and should show exposures based on “worst case” scenarios;
(4) A certification that the facility will comply with all applicable standards for radio frequency emissions, including cumulative effects, and a description of the manner in which the radio frequency emissions for the facility were calculated and the results of those calculations. Individual and cumulative emissions should be evaluated; and
(5) If the certification of the facility as currently installed, or as proposed to be modified, is subject to conditions designed to limit general public or occupational exposure, identify those conditions, and demonstrate that they have been satisfied, or describe when they will be satisfied.

i) Structural Analysis

with applicable laws and codes; 3) the structure’s capacity for additional collocated antennas; 4) the precise point at which the antennas shall be mounted; and
(3) A certification that the structure(s) on which the wireless facility (including all accessory equipment, such as radios, cabinets, etc.) will be placed can safely support the wireless facility; and that all elements of the wireless facility comply with applicable safety standards, including, without limitation, GO 95, 165, and 166.

j) Notice

i) Evidence that notice has been given consistent with Attachment 1 to all necessary parties.

2. RENEWAL REQUESTS: For a renewal of an existing permit, the application must provide the following information:

a) Location and Zoning Information

i) Location of the project site, including the nearest registered address, the names of the two nearest cross streets, GPS coordinates, and the current zone designation of the project site.
ii) If the existing facility is attached to a pole, provide the pole number. (To obtain a City-owned streetlight pole Facility ID number and to determine its small cell site status visit: Streetlight Inventory iii) Applicant shall include signed documentation indicating that applicant is authorized by the owner of the support structure and/or real property to continue operating the facility.

b) Description of the Project for Renewal

i) A description of the existing facility(ies).
ii) A list of all facilities and equipment currently installed and the dimensions, weight, and manufacturer’s specifications for each.
iii) A written description of the concealment measures applicant is using to aesthetically blend the facility to the immediate surroundings and to minimize its visual impact. This should include, but not be limited to, a description of concealment techniques, sizing and placement of elements of the facility (including undergrounding), measures to limit visibility of the facility from residential dwelling units, and the textures and colors used in the concealment process. If none, so state.
iv) A description of the site and any deployment outside the site. v) A description of all changes made to the facility from the date of the original installation (whether or not approved) and a description of the changes in height since January 22, 2012.

Version August 26, 2019 Page 11 of 18

c) Prior Approvals/Permits

i) A copy of all approvals and/or permits for the tower or base station and any subsequent modification approvals and/or permits, and of any required conditions (imposed by the City and/or third party) placed on the initial or subsequent approvals and/or permits.
ii) A showing that the facility is in compliance with existing conditions of the underlying approval(s)/permit(s). If the facility is not in compliance with conditions as of the date of application, there must be a plan submitted for correction of any non-compliance condition.

d) Facility Plan and Photograph(s)

i) Three (3) copies of the existing facility plan at a scale of 1”=20’ or larger and including a north-pointing arrow on each sheet and title block with applicant’s name, owner’s name, and contact information. ii) Current color photographs of the facility and its surroundings.

e) Visual Impact Analysis

i) A visual impact analysis, which shall include photographs, demonstrating from all four primary directions (north, south, east, and west) the visual impacts of the existing facility. Consideration shall be given to views from public areas as well as from private property.

f) Noise

i) Operation of wireless facilities shall comply with the noise regulations set in Chapters 9.04 and 9.07 of the Code and the noise element of the General Plan. Demonstrate continued compliance by providing, among other relevant information, a description of the facilities and/or equipment within the applicant’s project that induce or generate noise, as well as the noise levels of said facilities and/or equipment. For facilities that generate noise, please provide testing data for noise assuming maximum facility utilization and operational utilization (worst case) 10 feet from the source.

Specify times and conditions during which noise generation will occur.

g) FCC Radio Frequency Standards

Version August 26, 2019 Page 12 of 18

(1) A description of each of the antennas and all related fixtures, structures, appurtenances and apparatus, including the height above grade, volume in total cubic feet, materials, lighting, and the directionality of each antenna (e.g., omni, directional, etc.); (2) The frequency, modulation and class of service;
(3) A clear identification of areas, both vertically and horizontally, where exposure levels exceed FCC standards for general public and occupational exposures. Please note that applicant’s analysis must show that it has appropriately taken cumulative exposures into account, and should show exposures based on “worst case” scenarios;
(4) A certification that the facility is in compliance with all applicable standards for radio frequency emissions, including cumulative effects, and a description of the manner in which the radio frequency emissions for the facility were calculated and the results of those calculations. Individual and cumulative emissions should be evaluated; and
(5) If the certification of the facility as currently installed is subject to conditions designed to limit general public or occupational exposure, identify those conditions, and demonstrate that they have been satisfied, or describe when they will be satisfied.

h) Structural Analysis

i) A report signed by a California licensed professional engineer qualified in structural engineering, containing the following:
(1) In the case of a wireless facility attached to existing infrastructure, documentation of the ability of the structure to continue to support the antennas and any required maintenance;
(2) In the case of a facility with a support structure (e.g. monopole), documentation that the structure is capable of continuing to support the antennas (and any other equipment attached to or supported by the support structure) and complies with applicable laws and codes, as well as the structure’s capacity for additional collocated antennas; and
(3) A certification that the structure(s) on which the wireless facility (including all accessory equipment, such as radios, cabinets, etc.) is placed can continue to safely support the wireless facility; and that all elements of the wireless facility comply with applicable safety standards, including, without limitation, GO 95, 165, and 166.

i) Notice

i) Evidence that notice has been given consistent with Attachment 1 to all necessary parties.

Version August 26, 2019 Page 13 of 18

3. ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS: For all other types of applications, the following must be provided:

a) Location and Zoning Information

i) Location of the project site, including the nearest registered address, the names of the two nearest cross streets, GPS coordinates, and the present zone designation of the project site.
ii) If the facility is proposed to be attached to an existing utility pole, provide the pole number. (To obtain a City-owned streetlight pole Facility ID number and to determine its small cell site status visit: Streetlight Inventory
iii) Applicant shall include signed documentation indicating that applicant is authorized by the owner of the support structure and/or real property to install and operate the proposed facility.

b) Description of the Proposed Project

i) A description of the proposed facility(ies), including whether the project is a new facility, a collocated facility, or a modification to an existing facility. ii) If the application is for a small cell facility, an explanation asserting all of the grounds why the proposed facility constitutes a small cell facility. iii) If a new facility, the applicant shall include an explanation of whether the new facility could and will be designed to accommodate future wireless facilities.
iv) A list of all facilities and equipment proposed to be installed and the dimensions, weight, and manufacturer’s specifications for each. v) A written description of the concealment measures applicant proposes to use to aesthetically blend the facility to the immediate surroundings and to minimize its visual impact. This should include, but not be limited to, a description of proposed concealment techniques, sizing and placement of elements of the facility (including undergrounding proposed), measures proposed to limit visibility of the facility from residential dwelling units, and the textures and colors to be used in the concealment process. If none, so state.
vi) A description of any ground disturbance necessary to complete the proposed project.
vii) A description of the site and any deployment outside the site necessary to complete the proposed project.
viii)If a collocation, a description of why this installation qualifies as a collocation within the meaning of the FCC rules. Applicant must also provide the following:
(1) A description of all installation procedures and plans for the facility; and
Version August 26, 2019 Page 14 of 18

(2) A description of all changes to be made to the existing structure, which description will, among other things, identify precisely what changes will be made to the supporting structure.

c) Prior Approvals/Permits

i) If a wireless facility already exists on the site, provide the following:
(1) A copy of all approvals and/or permits for the tower or base station that is to be modified, and any subsequent modification approvals and/or permits, and of any required conditions (imposed by the City and/or third party) placed on the initial or subsequent approvals and/or permits.
(2) A showing that the facility, as modified, will be in compliance with existing conditions, whether or not it is in compliance with conditions as of the date of application. There must be a plan submitted for correction of any non-compliant condition.

d) Site Plan

i) Three (3) copies of a facility site plan at a scale of 1”=20’ or larger and including the following:
(1) A north-pointing arrow on each plan sheet;
(2) Title block with applicant’s name, owner’s name, and contact information;
(3) Depiction of the fully-constructed proposed facility; (4) Location of lot lines, streets (with street names), easements, and all structures and improvements, including accessory equipment, underground utilities and support structures, existing and proposed; (5) Existing and proposed elevations of all facilities, equipment, support structures, appurtenances, and other related structures (6) Slopes, contours, trees and other pertinent physical features of the site, existing and proposed;
(7) All exterior lighting on the site, existing and proposed; (8) Location use and approximate distance from property lines of the nearest structures on all properties abutting the site; and (9) The location of parking for maintenance personnel.

e) Landscape Plan

i) If any landscaped ground will be disturbed, three (3) copies of a landscape plan for the site, at a scale of 1/8”=1’ or larger, and including the following:
(1) Existing trees within fifty feet (50’) of the proposed wireless communication facility;
(2) Species, diameter and condition of all such trees;
Version August 26, 2019 Page 15 of 18

(3) Final disposition of all existing trees; and
(4) Species, location and sizes of trees and other vegetation proposed to be installed in conjunction with the wireless communication facility.

f) Site Photograph(s)

i) Current color photographs of the site and its surroundings.

g) Visual Impact Analysis

i) A visual impact analysis, which shall include photomontage, photo simulation or similar technique, demonstrating, from all four primary directions (north, south, east, and west) the potential visual impacts of the proposed facility. Consideration shall be given to views from public areas as well as from private property. The analysis shall assess the cumulative impacts of the proposed wireless communication facility and other existing wireless facilities in the area, and shall identify and include all feasible mitigation measures consistent with the technological requirements of the proposed facility.

h) Noise

i) FCC Radio Frequency Standards

i) A report signed by a California licensed professional engineer with expertise in radio communications facilities and the calculation of radio frequency emissions that affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the proposed installation will be compliant with the FCC’s standards. The report must also contain the following:
(1) A description of each of the proposed antennas and all related fixtures, structures, appurtenances and apparatus, including the height above grade, volume in total cubic feet, materials, lighting, and the directionality of each antenna (e.g., omni, directional, etc.); Version August 26, 2019 Page 16 of 18

(2) The frequency, modulation and class of service;
(3) A clear identification of areas, both vertically and horizontally, where exposure levels will exceed FCC standards for general public and occupational exposures. Please note that applicant’s analysis must show that it has appropriately taken cumulative exposures into account, and should show exposures based on “worst case” scenarios;
(4) A certification that the facility will comply with all applicable standards for radio frequency emissions, including cumulative effects, and a description of the manner in which the radio frequency emissions for the facility were calculated and the results of those calculations. Individual and cumulative emissions should be evaluated; and
(5) If the certification of the facility as currently installed, or as proposed to be modified, is subject to conditions designed to limit general public or occupational exposure, identify those conditions, and demonstrate that they have been satisfied, or describe when they will be satisfied.

j) Structural Analysis

i) A report signed by a California licensed professional engineer qualified in structural engineering, containing the following:
(1) In the case of a wireless facility attached to existing infrastructure, documentation of the ability of the structure to support the antennas, the proposed method of affixing the antennas and the precise point at which the antennas shall be mounted;
(2) In the case of a facility with a support structure (e.g. monopole), documentation that the structure is capable of supporting the antennas (and any other equipment to be attached to or supported by the support structure) and complies with applicable laws and codes, as well as the structure’s capacity for additional collocated antennas, and the precise point at which the antennas shall be mounted; and
(3) A certification that the structure(s) on which the wireless facility (including all accessory equipment, such as radios, cabinets, etc.) will be placed can safely support the wireless facility; and that all elements of the wireless facility comply with applicable safety standards, including, without limitation, GO 95, 165, and 166.

k) Notice

i) Evidence that notice has been given consistent with Attachment 1 to all necessary parties.

Version August 26, 2019 Page 17 of 18

l) Justification for Location/Collocation

i) A justification as to why the applicant chose the location for the proposed wireless communication facility. Such justification shall include a written assessment of not less than two (2) alternative locations considered by the applicant and the reasons why said alternative locations were rejected as candidates.
ii) A written explanation of the applicant’s investigation into collocating the proposed facility with an existing facility. Indicate whether collocation is or is not feasible and why.

m) Map of Applicant’s Existing Wireless Facilities and Coverage Assessment

i) A map and narrative description of all existing wireless facility sites used by the applicant which are located within the City, and any wireless facility sites located outside of the City but which provide coverage within any part of the City.

4. WAIVER REQUEST [if applicable]

a) If it is contended that the City is required by federal or state law to approve the facility, applicant must submit the information it relies upon to support that claim, identifying: (i) the legal standard it claims applies; (ii) the showings it relies upon for its claim; (iii) alternative legal standards that may apply that it claims to meet; and (iv) the showings it relies upon for those claims. Applicants are cautioned that, should they choose not to submit with respect to items (iii) and (iv), and the City believes that applicant misapplies or relies on the wrong legal standard, the waiver (and consequently the application) may be denied.

PART D: CERTIFICATION (ALL APPLICANTS)

I (we) hereby certify under penalty of perjury that (1) after diligent investigation, the information provided pursuant to this Application Form is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief; and (2) upon completion of the work proposed, the permitted personal wireless services facility will comply with all applicable laws, regulation, practices or other requirements under federal, state, or local law, including, but not limited to, building and electrical codes, the FCC’s radio frequency emissions standards, and the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

________________________________________________
Applicant’s Signature Date

___________________________
Applicant’s Printed Name
Version August 26, 2019 Page 18 of 18

Attachment 1

All applicants for Wireless Encroachment Permits shall comply with the following notice requirements:

1. Notice of the applicant’s pending application shall be mailed, by the applicant to the businesses and residences within a 500 foot radius of each of the proposed wireless facilities.

2. The contents of the mailed notice shall include, at a minimum:
a. A description of the location of each proposed wireless facility with sufficient specificity to allow notice recipients to be able to locate the involved location without requiring any additional information
b. Photo simulations of the proposed installation
c. The manner in which additional information may be obtained d. Any other information deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works or his/her designee

3. The applicant shall also post the notice in compliance with the following specifications:
a. In a conspicuous place at the location of the proposed wireless facility b. Be 12 square feet in sign area
c. A minimum of 4 feet in height from the ground level with a maximum height of 8 feet
d. Not be illuminated
e. Include the name and telephone number of the applicant f. Include the telephone number of the Public Works Department g. Contain only lettering whose size, style and color have been approved by the Director of Public Works
h. Include photo simulations of the proposed wireless facility i. Remain in place until completion of construction and final approval by the City j. Be removed, by the applicant, no later than 10 days after completion of construction and final approval of the project by Culver City

4. Submit to the Director of Public Works an affidavit verifying that the applicant has mailed and posted notices in full compliance with these notice requirements.

City Council Meeting AgendaAugust 14, 2023

City Council Meeting Agenda
August 14, 2023