kimley-horn.com 660 S Figueroa Street, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 90017
MEMORANDUM
To: Thomas Check, PE, TE
Senior Traffic Engineer, City of Culver City
From: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Date: July 17, 2025
Subject: Overland Avenue – Culver to the Creek Community Outreach
INTRODUCTION
The City of Culver City is a vibrant community, home to residential neighborhoods, creative offices, film studios, and other notable industries, which provide opportunities for living, working, and recreation.
The city remains committed to its citizens by exploring new opportunities to connect the community through a wide variety of transportation modes throughout Culver City.
At the direction of the Mobility Subcommittee, the City of Culver City has retained Kimley-Horn to support the city with stakeholder engagement and community outreach for the Better Overland Project, specifically focusing on the corridor segment between Culver Boulevard and the Ballona Creek. The intent of the outreach is to collect feedback from the community and various stakeholders along the corridor to determine the preferred alternative to connect the overall project together.
This 3,100 linear feet segment of Overland Avenue has a varying curb width between 75 and 76 feet.
A full project location map of the segment can be viewed in Attachment A. The following eight (8) intersections were included as part of the project:
1. Overland Avenue and Culver Boulevard
2. Overland Avenue and Barman Avenue
3. Overland Avenue and Braddock Drive
4. Overland Avenue and Garfield Avenue
5. Overland Avenue and Franklin Avenue/Farragut Drive
6. Overland Avenue and Farragut Drive
7. Overland Avenue and Julian Dixon Library
8. Overland Avenue and Ballona Creek
Some notable project destinations and stakeholder groups along the corridor in this segment include the following:
• Grace Lutheran Church
• Windsor Fountains Condominiums
• Julian Dixon Library
• Culver City Adult School
• Veterans Memorial Park
• Culver High School (Adjacent)
• Farragut Elementary School (Adjacent)
kimley-horn.com 660 S Figueroa Street, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 90017
SEGMENT ALTERNATIVES
Existing Conditions
The existing conditions along Overland Avenue provide two travel lanes in each direction, a center turn lane, parking on both sides of the street, and a Class II Bike Lane in both directions. While the posted speed limit is 35 mph, drivers in this segment travel at much higher speeds, which may lead cyclists to feel uncomfortable or not want to use the existing Class II facility due to safety concerns.
Alternative A: Class IV Bicycle Lanes with Parking on Both Sides The proposed Alternative A maintains parking on both sides of the street while incorporating a Class IV Protected Bike Lane. To construct this alternative, the design would remove the center turn lane and implement left turn restrictions at unsignalized intersections. Table 1 lists potential pros and cons of Alternative A.
Table 1 – Alternative A Pros and Cons
Pros Cons
• Provides Class IV Protected Bike Lane from
Culver Blvd to Ballona Creek
• Maintaining existing on-street parking may
be favorable to parking users
• Removes center turn lane and implements
left turn restrictions at unsignalized
intersections, which may make it difficult to
access side streets and driveways along
this segment
Alternative B: Class IV Bicycle Lanes with Center Turn Lane The proposed Alternative B maintains the center turn lane while incorporating Class IV Protected Bike Lane. To implement this alternative, the design would need to remove parking on the west side of Overland Avenue. However, based on the parking data provided by the City and our analysis, the removed parking stalls can still be accommodated on the side streets within the segment. Table 2 lists potential pros and cons of Alternative B.
Table 2 – Alternative B Pros and Cons
Pros Cons
• Provides Class IV Protected Bike Lane from
Culver Blvd to Ballona Creek
• Maintaining existing center turn lane for left
turns on unsignalized intersections and
driveways providing a refuge area for left
turning vehicles
• Removes parking on the west side of
Overland Avenue, which can be
accommodated with existing parking spaces
on side streets
kimley-horn.com 660 S Figueroa Street, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 90017
COMMUNITY OUTREACH MEETINGS
Approach to Stakeholder Engagement
Through community outreach, the City actively engaged community members and stakeholders to gather feedback and obtain a better understanding of potential local impacts. In June and July 2025, the City hosted three open house and walking tour events to present the proposed project alternatives.
Roll plots were displayed to help attendees visualize the options, and City staff were available to answer questions, document verbal comments, and collect comment cards for additional input.
These engagement events encouraged open dialogue, allowing residents to examine the alternatives, share concerns, and express their preferred alternative. In some meetings, walking tours of the corridor were offered to help participants better understand the project’s context and provide feedback in real time. Overall, the outreach process was designed to foster meaningful community involvement and inform the project’s direction.
Culver City Senior Center - 6/17/2025
The first community meeting open house and walking tour was hosted at the Culver City Senior Center on Tuesday, June 17th, from 6-9 pm. Over 32 people attended the event, and a significant amount of verbal feedback was provided. Attendees were able to walk the full corridor in groups led by City and Kimley-Horn staff to gain a better understanding of the proposed alternatives. One major stakeholder group that attended the meeting were members of the Grace Lutheran Church. They also provided a letter expressing their concerns about the proposed improvements, which can be read in Attachment B.
In general, the consensus of the meeting seemed positive, and people were excited about the project.
A summary of the feedback received is provided in Tables 3 and 4 below.
Table 3 – Alternative Choice Table 4 – Overall Project Support Alternative Support Project
A 6 Against 22
B 11 In Favor 35
N/A 126 Neutral 86
Meeting Data Summary:
• Attendance: 32
• Verbal Comments: 143
• Written Comments: N/A (Not collected)
kimley-horn.com 660 S Figueroa Street, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 90017
Veterans Memorial Park - 7/8/2025
The second community meeting open house and walking tour was hosted at the Veterans Memorial Park on Tuesday, July 8th, from 6-9 pm. Over 50 people attended the event and provided written and verbal feedback about the project. Community members were also able to walk the corridor with staff to see how the proposed alternatives would revise the corridor.
The comments collected during this meeting were similar to the sentiments expressed during the first meeting. A summary of the feedback received is provided in Tables 5 and 6 below.
Table 5 – Alternative Choice Table 6 – Overall Project Support Alternative Support Project
A 6 Against 22
B 18 In Favor 41
N/A 149 Neutral 110
Meeting Data Summary:
• Attendance: 52
• Verbal Comments: 148
• Written Comments: 25
Windsor Fountains Condominiums - 7/9/2025
The third and final community meeting open house was hosted at the Windsor Fountains Condominiums on Wednesday, June 18th, from 7-8 pm. The meeting aimed to collect feedback from community members but was met with considerable contention from the beginning. Residents were very opposed to Alternative A, as it would restrict access to their entry and exit driveways due to the removal of the center turn lane.
Several events occurred during the meeting that were atypical based on our experience with community outreach events. Within the first 15 minutes of the event, four out of five Windsor Fountains HOA Board Members were served court summons. During this time, there were loud verbal altercations between community members, HOA members, and the legal agent serving the summons, leading to leading to allegations of assault by the members. Subsequently, several community members encouraged others to cross out their names on the sign-in sheets. A member of our staff then went to the check-in table to discover that the sign-in sheets had been taken from the room. We conducted a search in the community room to find them hidden or in a trash receptacle, but we were unable to locate them. For this reason, we estimate the total number of attendees was approximately 31, based on photos and the number of people engaging with each staff member.
A majority of the Windsor Fountains Condominiums residents were strongly opposed to the project, as reflected in the feedback summarized in Tables 7 and 8 below.
kimley-horn.com 660 S Figueroa Street, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 90017
Table 7 – Alternative Choice Table 8 – Overall Project Support Alternative Support Project
A 0 Against 39
B 22 In Favor 22
N/A 76 Neutral 37
Meeting Data Summary:
• Attendance: 31 (Estimated)
• Verbal Comments: 86
• Written Comments: 12
Data Summary
All feedback collected during the outreach events has been compiled into the overall summary in Tables 9 and 10, based on the responses provided. A full summary of data collected during the community outreach and engagement can be viewed in Attachment C.
Table 7 – Alternative Choice Table 8 – Overall Project Support Alternative Support Project
A 12 Against 83
B 51 In Favor 98
N/A 351 Neutral 233
Meeting Data Summary:
• Total Attendance: 115
• Verbal Comments: 377
• Written Comments: 37
OUTREACH SUMMARY
Overall Feedback
Throughout the three community outreach events, community members had the opportunity to provide feedback, ask questions, and gain a better understanding of the project segment. Feedback from the public was collected verbally and through comment cards based on their observations of the roll plot and existing conditions along the corridor. The wide variety of feedback collected highlighted the importance of maintaining the existing center left-turn lane, addressing parking demand, and promoting the safety of bicyclists along the corridor.
ATTACHMENT A
Conceptual Design Roll Plot
BETTER OVERLAND
EXISTING
PROPOSED AL TERNATIVES & PARKING ANAL YSIS
CULVER BLVD TO BALLONA CREEK
CITY TO COORDINATE WITH GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH TO PROVIDE NEW
LOADING AND BLUE ZONES ON FRANKLIN AVE AND FARRAGUT DR TO SUPPORT THE ORGANIZATION’S CONTINUED OPERATIONS.
Revised July 16, 2025
CULVER BLVD TO BRADDOCK DR
PARKING DEMAND: 3
TOTAL SPACES: 25
BRADDOCK DR TO FARRAGUT DR
PARKING DEMAND: 10
TOTAL SPACES: 10
FARRAGUT DR TO BALLONA CREEK
PARKING DEMAND: 42
TOTAL SPACES: 43
CULVER BLVD TO BARMAN AVE
PARKING DEMAND: 2
TOTAL SPACES: 13
BARMAN AVE TO BRADDOCK DR
PARKING DEMAND: 0
TOTAL SPACES: 4
BRADDOCK DR TO GARFIELD AVE
PARKING DEMAND: 4
TOTAL SPACES: 5
GARFIELD AVE TO FRANKLIN AVE
PARKING DEMAND: 3
TOTAL SPACES: 3
FRANKLIN AVE TO FARRAGUT DR
PARKING DEMAND: 4
TOTAL SPACES: 7
FARRAGUT DR TO BALLONA CREEK
PARKING DEMAND: 10
TOTAL SPACES: 12
BRADDOCK DR
PARKING DEMAND: 2
TOTAL SPACES: 7
FARRAGUT DR
PARKING DEMAND: 11
TOTAL SPACES: 12
BRADDOCK DR
PARKING DEMAND: 19
TOTAL SPACES: 39
GARFIELD AVE
PARKING DEMAND: 18
TOTAL SPACES: 42
FRANKLIN AVE
PARKING DEMAND: 18
TOTAL SPACES: 35
FARRAGUT DR
PARKING DEMAND: 13
TOTAL SPACES: 30
BARMAN AVE
PARKING DEMAND: 16
TOTAL SPACES: 44
CULVER BLVD TO BRADDOCK DR
PROPOSED SPACES: 25 (NO CHANGE)
CULVER BLVD
CULVER BLVD
CULVER BLVD
CULVER BLVD
BRADDOCK DR TO FARRAGUT DR
PROPOSED SPACES: 7 (-3)
INSTEAD:
3 SPACES AVAILABLE ON FRANKLIN AVE
FARRAGUT DR TO BALLONA CREEK
PROPOSED SPACES: 40 (-3)
INSTEAD:
3 SPACES AVAILABLE ACROSS OVERLAND AVE
CULVER BLVD TO BARMAN AVE
PROPOSED SPACES: 11 (-2)
INSTEAD:
2 SPACES AVAILABLE ON BARMAN
AL TERNATIVE
BARMAN AVE TO BRADDOCK DR
PROPOSED SPACES: 0 (-4)
INSTEAD:
4 SPACES AVAILABLE ON BARMAN
BRADDOCK DR TO GARFIELD AVE
PROPOSED SPACES: 3 (-2)
INSTEAD:
2 SPACES AVAILABLE ON BRADDOCK DR
FRANKLIN AVE TO FARRAGUT DR
PROPOSED SPACES: 6 (-1)
INSTEAD:
1 SPACE AVAILABLE ON FRANKLIN AVE
FARRAGUT DR TO BALLONA CREEK
PROPOSED SPACES: 21 (+9)
BRADDOCK DR
TOTAL SPACES: 7
EXISTING DEMAND: 2
AVAILABLE SPACES: 5
FARRAGUT DR
TOTAL SPACES: 12
EXISTING DEMAND: 11
AVAILABLE SPACES: 1
BRADDOCK DR
TOTAL SPACES: 39
EXISTING DEMAND: 19
AVAILABLE SPACES: 20
GARFIELD AVE
TOTAL SPACES: 42
EXISTING DEMAND: 18
AVAILABLE SPACES: 24
FRANKLIN AVE
TOTAL SPACES: 35
EXISTING DEMAND: 18
AVAILABLE SPACES: 17
FARRAGUT DR
TOTAL SPACES: 30
EXISTING DEMAND: 13
AVAILABLE SPACES: 17
BARMAN AVE
TOTAL SPACES: 44
EXISTING DEMAND: 16
AVAILABLE SPACES: 28
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
JULIAN DIXON
LIBRARY
GRACE
LUTHERAN
CHURCH
GRACE
LUTHERAN
CHURCH
BALLONA CREEK
ACCESS POINT
JULIAN DIXON
LIBRARY
BALLONA
CREEK
BALLONA
CREEK
BALLONA
CREEK
JULIAN DIXON
LIBRARY
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL
TO BE INSTALLED
IN PHASE 1
PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL
TO BE INSTALLED
IN PHASE 1
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANES
INSTALL NO LEFT TURN
RESTRICTION
INSTALL NO LEFT TURN
RESTRICTION
INSTALL NO LEFT TURN
RESTRICTION
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
INSTALL PROTECTED
BIKE LANE
INSTALL
BIKE LANES
LEFT TURN LANE
TO FACILITATE EXITS
FROM WINDSOR FOUNTAINS
LEFT TURN LANE
TO FACILITATE ENTRY
TO WINDSOR FOUNTAINS
2 MIN WALK2 MIN WALK
2 MIN WALK2 MIN WALK
2 MIN WALK
2 MIN WALK
2 MIN WALK
2 MIN WALK
2 MIN WALK
2 MIN WALK
GARFIELD AVE TO FRANKLIN AVE
PROPOSED SPACES: 0 (-3)
INSTEAD:
3 SPACES AVAILABLE ON GARFIELD AVE
CULVER BLVD TO BRADDOCK DR
PROPOSED SPACES: 25 (NO CHANGE)
BRADDOCK DR TO FARRAGUT DR
PROPOSED SPACES: 11 (+1)
FARRAGUT DR TO BALLONA CREEK
PROPOSED SPACES: 40 (-3)
INSTEAD:
3 SPACES AVAILABLE ON FARRAGUT DR
CULVER BLVD TO BARMAN AVE
PROPOSED SPACES: 0 (-13)
INSTEAD:
13 SPACES AVAILABLE ON BARMAN
BARMAN AVE TO BRADDOCK DR
PROPOSED SPACES: 0 (-4)
INSTEAD:
4 SPACES AVAILABLE ON BARMAN
BRADDOCK DR TO GARFIELD AVE
PROPOSED SPACES: 0 (-5)
INSTEAD:
5 SPACES AVAILABLE ON BRADDOCK DR
FRANKLIN AVE TO FARRAGUT DR
PROPOSED SPACES: 0 (-7)
INSTEAD:
7 SPACES AVAILABLE ON FRANKLIN AVE
FARRAGUT DR TO BALLONA CREEK
PROPOSED SPACES: 0 (-12)
INSTEAD:
12 SPACES AVAILABLE ON FARRAGUT DR
BRADDOCK DR
TOTAL SPACES: 7
EXISTING DEMAND: 2
AVAILABLE SPACES: 5
FARRAGUT DR
TOTAL SPACES: 12
EXISTING DEMAND: 11
AVAILABLE SPACES: 1
BRADDOCK DR
TOTAL SPACES: 39
EXISTING DEMAND: 19
AVAILABLE SPACES: 20
GARFIELD AVE
TOTAL SPACES: 42
EXISTING DEMAND: 18
AVAILABLE SPACES: 24
FRANKLIN AVE
TOTAL SPACES: 35
EXISTING DEMAND: 18
AVAILABLE SPACES: 17
FARRAGUT DR
TOTAL SPACES: 30
EXISTING DEMAND: 13
AVAILABLE SPACES: 17
BARMAN AVE
TOTAL SPACES: 44
EXISTING DEMAND: 16
AVAILABLE SPACES: 28
GARFIELD AVE TO FRANKLIN AVE
PROPOSED SPACES: 0 (-3)
INSTEAD:
3 SPACES AVAILABLE ON GARFIELD AVE
4 MIN WALK
6 MIN WALK
4 MIN WALK
N
0’ 40’ 80’ 160’
SCALE
2 MIN WALK
BALLONA CREEK
ACCESS POINT
BALLONA CREEK
ACCESS POINT
WINDSOR FOUNTAINS
CONDOMINIUMS
WINDSOR FOUNTAINS
CONDOMINIUMS
GRACE
LUTHERAN
CHURCH
WINDSOR FOUNTAINS
CONDOMINIUMS
CULVER CITY
SENIOR CENTER
VETERANS
MEMORIAL PARK
CULVER CITY
SENIOR CENTER
CULVER BLVD
CULVER BLVD
VETERANS
MEMORIAL PARK
CULVER CITY
SENIOR CENTER
Wherever parking spaces are lost, this shows
where you could park instead.
This tells you the number of:
• Total parking spaces on this side street today
• Existing parking demand today
• Available spaces to accommodate the changes
in parking on Overland Ave in this alternative
This is approximately how long it would take to
walk to the alternative parking location.
This is how many parking spaces are proposed this
alternative on this block in . The number in
parentheses indicates the change in parking spaces
compared to the current number of spaces on
Overland Ave.
HOW TO READ THIS PLAN
LEGEND
HIGH-VISIBILITY BIKE LANE MARKINGS
INTERSECTION, ADA, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS
PROTECTED BIKE LANE BARRIER
PARKING SPACEP
SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
Maintains parking on both
sides of Overland Ave.
Removes center left turn
lane. Installs no left turn
restrictions at unsignalized
intersections.
+
—
A
AL TERNATIVE
Maintains center left turn lane.
Removes parking on the
west side of Overland Ave.
+
—
B
The conceptual alternatives presented here were approved by the City Council at their May 24, 2024, meeting. These concepts have been further refined based on community feedback received at additional outreach events held on June 17, July 8, and July 9, 2025. Conceptual design is subject to refinement during final engineering and construction.
ATTACHMENT B
Grace Lutheran Church Letter
ATTACHMENT C
Community Engagement Summary Data
Culver City Senior Center - 6/17/2025
General Feedback Comment Types
Keeping the center left-turn lane is necessary Bicyc le 24 Would like a class IV bike lane regardless of alternative chosen Intersection 11 Keep as existing, no protected bike lane needed Other 65 The bike lane is hardly used, do not change the corridor. Leave as is. Parking 33 Parking needs to be protected in front of the church because there is no church parking lot. Pedestrian 2 The corridor needs more lighting. Alternative B is preferred to keep the center left-turn lane Safety 8 Would like parking on both sides of the street due to street cleaning Tuesday and Thursday. No changes needed The community expressed they do not want their taxes to go to this project. Would rather spend the money on something different. Alternative Farragut school will have an issue turning on school days during peak hours A 6 Suggestion to add bike signals. B 11
Concerns on maintenance of bike lane. N/A 126
Support
Against 25
In Favor 32
Neutral 86
Attendance 32
Verbal Comments 143
Written Comments N/A
Veterans Memorial Park - 7/8/2025
General Feedback Comment Types
Concerns on the affects the new protected bike lane barrier will have on people with disabilities Bicyc le 49 Concerns with the protected bike lane collecting trash and cyclists not being able to move out of the way safely due to the protected barrier. Intersection 14 Majority like the addition of the full traffic signal at the Julian Dixon Library. Other 59 Would like additional lighting for sidewalks and bike lanes. Parking 20 Concerns with the bus loading and unloading. How will the project ensure no ped+bike accidents from bus loading and unloading. Pedestrian 12 Concerns with parking being removed especially for businesses in the area. Would rather remove the center left-turn lane. Safety 19 Many agreed the center left-turn lane is necessary to safely turn left or merge into traffic when exiting a driveway.
Prohibiting left-turns is disliked. Alternative
Parking in between a bike lane and moving traffic is dangerous especially for those with disabilities. A6 E-Bikes and scooters speed in bike lanes and on sidewalks which is dangerous. B 18 Many like traffic signal and intersection improvements as part of the project. N/A 146 Cyclists feel more safe riding in a protected bike lane along this corridor.
Support
Against 22
In Favor 41
Neutral 110
Attendance 52
Verbal Comments 148
Written Comments 25
Windsor Fountains Condominiums - 7/9/2025
General Feedback Comment Types
Alternative B is preferred as the center left-turn lane is needed to merge onto oncoming traffic especially when leaving the condo parking lot. Bicycle 14 In favor of the full traffic signal that will be installed at the library. Intersection 5 Concerns on increase in traffic. Other 40
Concerns on parking study. They felt that the walk time and available spaces are not accurate. Parking 1 7 Concerns on parking, specifically permit parking. Ped estrian 12 Concerns on parking for streets cleaning days. Safet y7 Many community members would prefer to keep it as existing. Vehicle 2 Threatened to sue the City if the project moves forward.
Disability concerns if protected bike lane is added due to the protective barrier. Concrete is not preferred. Alternative Concerns on cost. The community does not want their taxes going towards this project. A 0 Concerned about proposed parking could pose danger as they have to be cautious when exiting the vehicle. Especially those with disabilities. B2 2 Safe bike lanes are greatly appreciated. N/A 76
The community expressed they would greatly appreciate pedestrian and bike lighting along the corridor.
There community expressed they see many cyclists on the sidewalk instead of the bike lanes currently. Support Recommended relocating the signal at the library closer to the creek to permit left-turn traffic from the driveway. Against 39 In Favor 22
Neutral 37
Attendance 31 (Estimated)
Verbal Comments 86
Written Comments 12
17%
8%
45%
23%
1%6%
Culver City Senior Center - 6/17/2025
Bicycle
Intersection
Other
Parking
Pedestrian
Safety
28%
8%
34%
12%
7%
11%
Veterans Memorial Park - 7/8/2025
Bicycle
Intersection
Other
Parking
Pedestrian
Safety
15%
5%
41%
18%
12%
7%2%
Windsor Fountains Condominiums - 7/9/2025
Bicycle
Intersection
Other
Parking
Pedestrian
Safety
Vehicle
Overall Feedback
The community expressed concerns on parking relocation as there are permitted parking areas and many businesses do not have a parking lot.
The community expressed fear of biking on the current bike lanes due to high speed traffic. Comment Types It was expressed that the center left-turn lane is needed to safely merge onto oncoming traffic and exit/enter parking lots. Bicycle 87 There were concerns for those with disabilities since the protected bike lane buffer could be a hazard for those with disabilities. Intersection 30 Many members expressed they would prefer option B over option A since parking can be relocated. Other 16 4 There were concerns on parking during street cleaning days. Parking 70 The community expressed that they are for the new traffic signal at the library. Pedestrian 26 Several community members expressed that they would appreciate pedestrian and bike lane lighting along the corridor. Safety 34 Cyclists expressed they would feel more safe if a protected bike lane was present and would prefer to keep the center left-turn lane. Vehicle 2 Many community members were concerned with cost. They do not want their taxes to go to this project.
Community members expressed that they see many bikes on the sidewalk rather than the bike lane.
Alternative
A1 2
B5 1
N/A 348
Support
Against 86
In Favor 95
Neutral 233
Total Attendance 115
Total Verbal Comments 377
Total Written Comments 37
21%
7%
40%
17%
6%
8%1%
Overall - Comment Types
Bicycle
Intersection
Other
Parking
Pedestrian
Safety
Vehicle
21%
23%
56%
Overall - Support
Against
In Favor
Neutral
3%
12%
85%
Overall - Alternative Choice
A
B
N/A