1 THESE MINUTES ARE NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED B
THE CULVER CITY STANDING MOBILITY SUBCOMMITTEE
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CULVER CITY June 30, 2026
STANDING MOBILITY SUBCOMMITTEE 6:00 p.m.
CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA
Call to Order & Roll Call
Vice Mayor Fish called the special meeting of the Standing Mobility Subcommittee to order at 6:04 p.m. in the Dan Patacchia Meeting Room at City Hall.
Present: Freddy Puza, Mayor
Bubba Fish, Vice Mayor
Staff Present: Lea Eriksen, Senior Assistant City Manager Emily Stadnicki, Planning and Development
Director
Andrew Maximous, Mobility and Traffic Engineering
Manager
Thomas Check, Senior Traffic Engineer
Gabriel Barreras, Senior Planner
Alicia Ide, Senior Management Analyst
Wallis Nash, Senior Management Analyst
Henry Phipps, Senior Management Analyst
Ryan Hund, Transportation Management Analyst
Kate Saunders-Britton, Administrative Secretary
o0o
Pledge of Allegiance
Vice Mayor Fish the Pledge of Allegiance.
o0o
Community Announcements by Members
Vice Mayor Fish commended Andrew Maximous, Thomas Check, and Public Works for the work done on the bike lanes on Elenda noting that it felt very safe.
o0o
Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
2 Information Items from Staff
Gabriel Barreras, Senior Planner, provided an update on the Parking Maximums Study; discussed the research and outreach phase; the focus group with residential and mixed use developers to discuss current parking demands; support of a healthy housing market; an upcoming focus group on July 9 comprised of business owners; finding a balance; responding to the reality of daily users and market demands in a variety of neighborhood settings; a memo on best practices coming forward in August highlighting structure and implementation of parking maximums; overview of outreach and key points from focus groups; and initial recommendations.
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding the first focus groups that included developers; next steps; tailoring the program to meet local demands; the new Planning Director; and the timeline for the drive-through ordinance.
Alicia Ide, Senior Management Analyst, reported on signage restrictions in the courtyard regarding skateboarding, roller skating, roller blading, and biking; the resolution banning rollerblading, roller skating and skateboarding but not biking; and options to change or eliminate the signs.
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding the ability to direct staff to make the change and Subcommittee agreement to align the changes with those made downtown.
Ryan Hund, Transportation Management Analyst, discussed service changes for Culver CityBus; new hires that have allowed service to return to 98% of what it was last year; baseline service levels; meeting changing demand; finding efficiencies in how to serve riders; the partnership with TransitApp; acceptance of contactless payments; service changes beginning on July 13, 2026; and additional information available at culvercitybus.com.
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding appreciation for the changes and a request that alerts about changes be specific about what is being changed.
o0o
Public Comment - Items NOT on the Agenda
Vice Mayor Fish invited public comment.
Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
3 Alicia Ide, Senior Management Analyst, read the Culver City statement on hate speech and decorum and reminded everyone that speakers must sign up to speak before the agenda item is called.
The following members of the public addressed the Subcommittee:
Tamar Fuhrer requested that the Subcommittee direct the Sepulveda Connects project team to bring the conceptual plan forward only after traffic calming mitigations have been identified and recommended for Sunkist Park; discussed projected increased cutthrough traffic in Sunkist Park; existing levels of cut-through traffic; the City Council’s demonstrated commitment to safety; prioritization of local streets for people in the General Plan; and required mitigations and safety improvements for other projects.
Raaj Karnik echoed previous comments; discussed Sunkist Park traffic calming mitigation measures; thanked Mayor Puza for his attendance of the recent design workshop; discussed good ideas presented; provided background on himself noting that Segrell Way has always been a cut-through route; expressed concern with letting his 4 year old play in the front yard anymore; diverters in the neighborhood that make it harder for neighborhood residents to get around; and he proposed use of diverters on the larger streets.
Monica Richardson expressed opposition to the Better Overland Project; discussed shared bus/bike/car lanes; bus only lanes during peak hours; maintaining parking; concern with the connection between Michael Schneider and Streets for All; she wanted to see streets and sidewalks fixed; noted that the agenda was being pushed all around Los Angeles from the outside with claims of getting people elected; she asserted that residents did not want the proposed changes; stated that protected bike lanes removed all parking; discussed money accepted by Council Members during their campaigns; changes in Santa Monica; and she asserted that the changes would be pulled as they were on Brand Boulevard.
Michelle Weiner expressed appreciation for the well-designed Robertson bike lane to the train station; reported riding her bike to the LAX Transit Center; she was looking forward to the Culver City portion of Sepulveda Connects that would improve the situation for everyone in Culver City from Venice to Centinela; and she highlighted a problem by the pedestrian bridge at the Creek.
Michael Koppy questioned why there was no notification of the submission to Caltrans regarding parking under the freeway overpass; asserted that parking was already allowed with parking meters under the I-10 on Pico; discussed planning requirements for Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
4 bicycle parking in new construction; unworkable rack placement; felt that covered parking should be required with proper parking racks with enough locking posts for bicycles; discussed number of miles ridden; and he provided information to Subcommittee Members.
Jim Shanman, Culver City Safe Routes to School Coordinator, announced upcoming events for the summer noting that additional information was available at ccwalkandroll.com and
walkmorebikemore.org.
Marta Valdez discussed the 3,400 signatures collected in opposition to the Better Overland Project; requested additional consideration of the project; discussed lawsuits from injuries related to dangerous sidewalks; ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessible bikeways; issues with cemented protected bike lanes; support for providing the green lanes; and she proposed a scenario to allow room for doors to be opened without hurting cyclists that also allows handicapped individuals the space they need.
Allan Lu expressed opposition to the use of diverters; asserted that traffic would have no incentive to stop at the four-way stop if the diverters were present; he recommended mimicking what is happening on the east side of Sepulveda between Sepulveda and Overland by cul de sacing Segrell and Culver Park at Slauson to prevent cut-through traffic to the 405; asked that the southbound alley be shut off; discussed the four entrances available to residents and business; disallowing the left turn; and support for making the dangerous alley safer.
David Metzler discussed allowing bicycles to go two ways on oneway streets; slowing down vehicle traffic; he suggested offering other methods for attending meetings where designs are presented; and noted other cities that allow presentations with a Q&A session that includes texting capability.
Travis Morgan discussed concern that final designs for Safer Fox Hills that are ready to be approved have not yet been placed on an agenda; community support; and the original promise that the project would go to construction in 2022.
Mayor Puza indicated that he expected that to be on the next agenda.
Debbie Gambino discussed safety concerns for those riding, motorists, and pedestrians; reported observance of cyclists not obeying the rules of the road; an attitude exhibited by cyclists who feel like they can do whatever they want wherever they want; Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
5 communication with CCPD who indicated that they are not required to take care of issues; and assuaging growing division between drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians by listening to public comment.
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding options for traffic calming in Sunkist Park; the community-driven process; and an update on International Walk to School Day in October.
o0o
Receive and File Correspondence
MOVED BY MAYOR PUZA, SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR FISH AND UNANIMOUSLY
CARRIED, THAT THE STANDING MOBILITY SUBCOMMITTEE RECEIVE AND FILE CORERSPONDENCE.
o0o
Consent Calendar Items
Item C-1
Approval of Minutes for the May 12, 2026 Meeting
Alicia Ide, Senior Management Analyst, discussed a request that the poem from the last meeting be added to the minutes.
MOVED BY VICE MAYOR FISH, SECONDED BY MAYOR PUZA AND UNANIMOUSLY
CARRIED, THAT THE STANDING MOBILITY SUBCOMMITTEE APPROVE MINUTES FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 12, 2026 AS AMENDED.
o0o
Action Items
Item A-1
(1) Receive an Update and Discuss the Tri-School Area Mobility Study, Including Findings and Potential Interventions; and (2) Provide Input to Staff
Andrew Maximous, Mobility and Transportation Manager, provided a summary of the material of record.
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding clarification on removal of parking spaces; the existing bicycle Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
6 facility; and providing a protected phase for cyclists when they get to Culver.
Vice Mayor Fish invited public input.
The following members of the public addressed the Subcommittee:
Connor Webb expressed appreciation for the work of staff; asserted that the route should provide the safest way to school possible; felt that both concepts fell short by not providing any road separation on Elenda; discussed volume limits for what would be a comfortable greenway; school traffic; traffic data indicating 74 vehicles per direction; safety concerns with bicycles being passed by cars; families that will choose a less sustainable way to get to school if the route does not feel comfortable; and the need to connect to investments made in other areas.
Greg Maron noted that the community had called for improvements to Elenda for a long time; discussed data presented and efforts to undermine the value and need for bike lanes; the need to acknowledge that there are 7,000 students who regularly use the street; the importance of taking City Council direction into consideration; concern with staff ignoring decisions and input from the City Council; lack of follow through with agreement to hold community meetings across Culver City; concern that the process is undermining the safety of students; and a request that the City Council direct the City Manager to meet with staff to explain the leadership responsibility to staff.
Adrian Killigrew expressed disappointment that there was no bike lane option for Elenda at the previous meeting; reported regularly biking the route: stated that there was no room to bike Elenda; asserted that the benefits of a protected bike lane outweighed the loss of a few parking spots; discussed a loud minority using intimidation and propaganda to stop progress; online trolling; concern that the consultants were intimidated and decided not to add the bike lane option; support for not allowing intimidation to dictate benefits to the City; and designing safe streets for students and residents rather than for a select few to stall progress.
Michelle Weiner discussed the importance of safe streets for bike lanes going to three different schools; benefits of safer streets to all users; echoed concerns that staff was bending over backwards for the residents on Elenda; felt the only thing historic about the neighborhood was their blockage of the plan; discussed the $1 million Safe Routes to School grant that the City could not accept due to resident intimidation; concern that efforts will have been Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
7 for nothing if the City does not put bike lanes on Elenda; the importance of moving forward now despite the pushback; and doing the right thing to keep the area safe for families.
Jim Shanman, Safe Routes to School Coordinator, expressed support for the safest route possible given available space; discussed the number of children that go through the area; support for Plan C as it has the most benefits with a gate at Huron; acknowledgement of the efforts of staff; getting the kids arriving by bicycle to use the gate with a passcode or passkey to sidestep problematic issues; a suggestion to require a bike safety class before allowing access; support for adding sidewalks; and the drop zones.
Marta Valdez expressed concern that previous speakers were bullying the Mobility and Transportation Manager; noted that everyone was supposed to listen to each other; discussed concern with ignoring the consultants paid to do the survey; the available safe route that would be affected by the Overland Project; traffic during peak hours; traffic volume; safety; and she expressed support for an earlier suggestion made to accommodate bicycles.
Maeve Killigrew indicated going into 4th grade at Farragut; reported that she did not feel safe biking and roller skating to school; and she felt that if a bike path were put in that she would feel much safer.
David Metzler noted that new information altered his planned comments; discussed time needed to review new information in order to provide remarks; length of the project; incidents in residential zones; people who buy houses and locate businesses in Culver City based on the vision of the City in the General Plan; ensuring that there are bike lanes on Duquesne and Elenda that are designated as major collectors; sidewalks; travel lanes that connect to the Creek; width of Elenda vs. Duquesne; and Elenda as part of an active transportation corridor meaning that vehicle traffic should be lower than on Duquesne.
Travis Morgan expressed appreciation to City staff for presenting the options noting that he would have liked to have seen the options in the staff report; discussed data based on generic roads; the Tri-School neighborhood; speed limits on typical local roads; additional protections for roads adjacent to schools; the need for protected bike lanes for students to travel to school; designing for the most vulnerable road user; and consideration of every stretch as part of a network and of impacts to the rest of the network.
Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
8 Tala Oszkay Febres-Cordero provided background on herself; discussed her use of the Elenda corridor to get her children to school; feeling safer as a driver with bike lanes that remind her to watch for cyclists and communicate that cyclists belong there; the lack of bike lanes on Elenda that results in drivers not looking for cyclists; her feeling of not being safe; prioritizing the safety of students over the inconvenience of a small number of residents; she asked for an option with a protected bike lane on Elenda; and she noted the need to give families safe alternatives to drive in order to have less traffic and safer school drop offs by investing in the next generation of Culver City families.
Shane Henson indicated being a member of the Advisory Committee on Housing and Homelessness (ACOHH) speaking in his personal capacity; discussed becoming a parent of a child who will attend Culver City schools and take Elenda to school; he wanted to see a protected bike lane option to be able to send his child to school safely; and asked that protected bike lanes be sent to the City Council for consideration.
Debbie Gambino discussed parents on Elenda who live in the area and have children going to school; noted the importance of safety; proposed keeping it simple and exploring the least expensive option first; felt that attacks on Mr. Maximous were inappropriate; she did not like to see decisions made out of emotion; and she expressed concern with dismissal of the study that was conducted.
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding appreciation for new information provided; design options presented; efforts to get the gate at Huron opened up on a temporary basis; review of potential barriers and available options; use of pedestrian gates for cyclists; one way Class 2 bike lanes for the southbound side; enhancing safety with additional infrastructure; curb extensions to limit exposure; the Bike Boulevard concept; transportation as affecting everyone; shared goals with different opinions on the best way to achieve them; feasibility; costs; day-to-day operations; community values; prioritizing safety and functionality; and support for Option C including protected bike lane options with an analysis of the gap between the schools and the bike path north of Culver Bouelvard.
Additional discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding appreciation for the public input; previous consideration of the item in March; direction to include protected bike lanes as an option to consider; serious consideration of feedback from the traffic consultants; the menu of options available; community engagement events; safety enhancements and traffic calming included in Option C; the importance of traffic Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
9 and access after the safety of all children; the street that all Culver City public school students end up travelling on; the importance of providing designated space for those using alternative modes of transportation; increased congestion and danger without providing other options; parents who are tired of driving their children around because no other viable options are available; providing protected facilities; connectivity; plans of the School District to build a path from Ballona Creek to the school; support for Option C with protected bike lanes; the need for additional information; viability of the cycle track option; community opposition to the removal of trees; ensuring that one mode of transportation is not pitted against another; protected bike lanes that have been proven to increase safety for all users; next steps; clarification that Option C includes a greenway and represents a Class 2 or 3 facility; returning to the Committee and the community with parking data for Elenda and the side streets to provide a clearer picture of impacts; support for Option 3 with the change of a recommended facility; support for providing protection in both directions; additional costs; operational complexities of a signal; the two foot buffer for the cycle track; support for considering an option with parking on one side; including the cycle track concept; support for providing a safe alternative to unprotected lanes without taking away any more parking than the non-protected concept; and options to consider. o0o
Item A-2
Receive and Discuss an Update Regarding Mobility Projects; and Direction to Staff
Thomas Check, Senior Traffic Engineer, provided an update on mobility projects; discussed work plan priorities for the division; the Better Overland Project; the Safer Fox Hills Project; the traffic signal battery backup system; LPI (Leading Pedestrian Intervals) upgrades throughout Culver City; planned expansion; signalized intersection safety improvements; fiber optic upgrades; the Overland Avenue high friction surface treatment;
implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Action Plan (BPAP); Citywide daylighting; and he noted the intent to return with regular updates.
Andrew Maximous, Mobility and Transportation Engineering Manager, noted that Thomas Check had created a website with an inventory of all traffic signal devices and locations and that the complete list of work in progress was available on the website.
Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
10 Discussion ensued between staff and Committee Members regarding on demand LPI; the grant supporting intersection improvements; timeline for the BPAP; clarification that no through lanes would be removed on Overland and some dual left turn lanes would be consolidated into a single left turn lane; staff agreement to post the presentation on the Mobility Subcommittee website; valid issues brought up around accessibility; the opportunity to enhance accessibility for everyone; Overland Phase One; Safer Fox Hills; support for proposed safety improvements; and a suggestion that staff provide a City Council presentation so that people can see that the project provides improvements to mobility for everyone with ADA, sidewalk, and signal improvements, not just a bike lane project and also include a discussion of which treatments are more ADA friendly and beneficial to those with mobility issues.
Vice Mayor Fish invited public comment.
The following members of the public addressed the Subcommittee:
Connor Webb discussed Lean on L.A.; the Robertson project; support for implementation of the original plans that included protection all the way to Venice; reorganization of the intersections; left turn boxes; confusion on how to turn left from southbound Robertson on to eastbound Washington; he proposed clarifying turn boxes and paint; and he asked staff to keep up the good work.
Mary Daval was called to speak but was not present in person or online.
Marta Valdez felt that the project should have been completed in four phases; discussed funding; concern with false information provided; the High Injury Network; accident data; compliance; and she requested a focus group where the community could have a back and forth dialogue to clear inconsistencies.
Travis Morgan expressed appreciation to the small but effective staff; noted that ADA compliant concrete protected bike lanes were a well-established, safe form of transportation across the nation; and he discussed funding for an update of the BPAP incorporating Vision Zero.
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding the scope amendment to include a BPAP update; reframing BPAP as a Vision Zero plan; the Vision Zero ordinance passed in 2015; the Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) that includes all the components of Vision Zero; the focus of Complete Streets and BPAP on right of way; incorporating the essence of Vision Zero in all that is done; the inability to change the name of the document; concern with Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
11 violating grant provisions by changing the scope; and making Vision Zero more prominent in the plan.
o0o
Item A-3
(1) Receive a Presentation and Discuss Improving Headways for Line 1 Within the Comprehensive Mobility Services Plan (CMSP); and Give Direction to Staff
Henry Phipps, Senior Management Analyst, provided a presentation on the request for information on what it would take to bring Line 1 headways to 10 minutes at peak times.
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding clarification on the route for the new service on Line 8; yard capacity; replacement buses; temporary storage of the older buses for use during the Olympics; bus distribution; Jefferson Enhanced Transit Service (JETS); the agreement for Line 8; providing service in Playa del Rey; reallocation of resources; communication and collaboration with Big Blue Bus and Metro; federal funding; changes in the CMSP; next steps and timeline for implementation; adding service vs. rearranging service; the short-term plan; leveraging investments; frequency of buses; those who were frustrated that a lane was taken from cars for buses; concern with reducing service on certain lines; finding a middle ground that would be less detrimental to other lines; and the Metro NextGen plan.
Vice Mayor Fish invited public comment.
The following members of the public addressed the Subcommittee:
Marta Valdez was called to speak but was not present in person or online.
Travis Morgan discussed data reflecting a significant jump in ridership when headways are at 8-10 minutes; ridership goals; he proposed creating a micro-transit system by eliminating some lines in underserved areas; and discussed the frequency of buses in Oslo, Norway noting that headways are a game changer.
Tamar Fuhrer expressed support for 10 minute headways on Line 1 but did not want to see that come out of Line 6; discussed the 10 minute threshold used for bus lane recommendations in Los Angeles; the proposal for a ballot measure to deal with the structural deficit in Transportation; ensuring that taking over transit ridership from Big Blue Bus and Metro is in the City’s financial Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
12 favor; formula funds that do not connect to ridership; and concern with taking on more of a burden.
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding implications of the transfer of resources; the need for direction on how to proceed; determining specific impacts and metrics; the 20 year plan that creates an aspirational scenario and includes reduced headways and taking over service on La Cienega from Metro; the dynamic plan; providing options; understanding priorities; productive expansion; ridership implications; coverage vs. frequency; money spent on the project that cannot be fully leveraged; reallocation of resources based on productivity of the line; and staff agreement to provide more specific data for the concepts.
Additional discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding appreciation for the work of staff; the effect making changes have on other agencies; looking at use of other resources; traffic patterns; riders transferring to other bus lines; compensation; formula funding; increased revenue with increased miles; the three year delay to when funding kicks in; understanding the amount of expansion needed and costs; clarifying priorities for additional resources; the ability to use additional resources on the 20 year plan; direction or clarity that would not significantly increase staff workload; understanding City Council priorities to allow staff to craft recommendations; access to data; equity impact; acknowledgement of the expertise of staff and a request for a staff recommendation on one or two viable options; observations of Washington and Line 1; construction impacts that affect travel times; traffic signal upgrades; bus signal priority improvements; bi-annual service changes; timing of transfers; the CMSP; making gradual changes; and the ability to reverse changes that are not working.
o0o
Item A-4
Receive a Report and Discuss the Enforcement Mechanisms Available to the City to Promote Compliance by the City's Shared
Micromobility Vendor (Bird) with the Terms of its Agreement with the City; and Provide Input to Staff
Seth Contreras, Mobility Planning Manager, provided a summary of the material of record.
Vice Mayor Fish invited public comment.
Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
13 The following members of the public addressed the Subcommittee:
Tamar Fuhrer discussed the need to hold micromobility companies more accountable; concern with putting the onus on residents to call in complaints; the inability to see the number to call to address issues when Birds are left in trees; Birds blocking the right of way on the Bike Path for several days at a time; and allowing e-bikes.
Travis Morgan expressed appreciation to Tamar for her comments and to staff for their hard work; discussed the number of rides; proposed having Sony look at their camera footage to see who is responsible for putting the scooters in trees; and he requested an update on the Metro BikeShare program which he hoped to see in Culver City.
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding appreciation for the public comment; the contracts; holding Bird accountable for their responsiveness; daily sweeps of the City using data; the customer service number; the ability for people to call 311 and get routed to Bird or to email
[email protected] with a location and photo; sharing information about contact options through social media and in the City newsletter; user accountability; clarification that Bird is the sole provider as the second vendor dropped out; the recent uptick in complaints; help from CCPD (Culver City Police Department); sharing reporting information with the community; data on scooters that have been idle for more than 48 hours; reliance on current enforcement mechanisms; the partnership between Culver City and Bird; ensuring Bird is maximizing safety; identification of patterns of use; being proactive in notifying Bird; collaboration between departments; criminal vandalism; allowing other vendors to apply for a permit to provide other options; the current non-exclusive agreement; work to create an RFP for continuation of the program; and the process to allow other vendors to apply.
o0o
Public Comment for Items NOT on the Agenda (Continued)
Vice Mayor Fish invited public participation.
The following members of the public addressed the Subcommittee:
Tamar Fuhrer requested information about Sunkist Park traffic calming; proposed including transportation in the purview of the BPAC; and discussed the current limited purview of BPAC.
Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
14 Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding CBC (Commission, Board and Committee) appointments; a recent request to change the name of the BPAC to the Mobility Advisory Committee; examination of the BPAC bylaws and purview;
clarification that a name change does not change the scope; jurisdiction of the BPAC vs. the Subcommittee; a request that staff presentations go to the BPAC before the Subcommittee for their feedback on specific issues; leveraging BPAC; the resident body vs. the City Council body; staff agreement to address the BPAC and return with a report; community engagement for Sunkist Park; analysis of alternatives presented and community input; lack of a definitive timeline at this point; clarification that Sepulveda Connects would not be done without any traffic mitigation; and communication and notices about options.
Travis Morgan requested information about the status of SB 720; discussed Mobility funding; a request to bring an agenda item to a future meeting with a presentation from CCPD on a transition plan and timeline with a draft ordinance for transferring funds from CCPD to Mobility for every month that implementation has not taken place; and providing incentives to accelerate the process.
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding concern with two subcommittees giving different direction and previous direction given to CCPD.
o0o
Items from Staff
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding potential meeting dates and agreement to meet sometime in September.
o0o
Items from Members
Discussion ensued between staff and Subcommittee Members regarding a request for an official letter from the City Council asking that the Beloit Gate be opened; the legislative platform; jurisdiction; previous efforts to get the gate opened; staff inability to keep up with the fading paint on the bike lanes on Jefferson; quick fixes; streets scheduled for resurfacing as part of the JPA (Joint Powers Authority); a request to agendize looking at the allocation of street resurfacing money and what is proposed for the Safe Streets project; allowing the Subcommittee to weigh in on Standing Mobility Subcommittee
June 30, 2026
15 priorities; the need to be able to alert the public to what is being done; information that will be included on the dashboard; City Council priorities and approval of the item; allowing the flexibility to focus funding as needed; use of funds to close funding gaps; use for ADA ramp upgrades, street lighting, and pedestrian upgrades; and additional information available in September for feedback from the Subcommittee.
o0o
Adjournment
There being no further business, at 10:20 p.m., the Standing Mobility Subcommittee adjourned its meeting.
o0o
___________________________________________________________ Alicia Ide
SECRETARY of the Culver City Standing Mobility Subcommittee, Culver City, California
APPROVED
___________________________________________________________ Bubba Fish
VICE MAYOR, Standing Mobility Subcommittee
Culver City, California