Cities Index.
Supplemental Reports

Cupertino City Council
January 17, 2024

Document
Supplemental Reports
Meeting
January 17, 2024
Body
Cupertino City Council
Original file
1.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cupertino.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

CC 1-17-2024
# 1
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Potential Service-Level
Reductions
Supplemental Report
1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SUPPLEMENTAL 1
Meeting: January 17, 2024

Agenda Item #1

Subject
Provide input to staff on potential service‐level reductions for the FY 2024‐25 Proposed and Final Budgets

Recommended Action
Provide input to staff on potential service‐level reductions for the FY 2024‐25 Proposed and Final Budgets

Background:

Staff’s responses to questions received from councilmembers are shown in italics.

Q1: The current budgeted amount for School Site Maintenance is $1,237,763, considering the actuals have been very close to this number, will staff please consider adjusting the savings to match the Budget? (Councilmember Moore)
Staff response:  The adopted budget
for School Site Maintenance is $1,383,586. The $1,237,763 takes into account estimated revenue of $145,000 to come up with the General Fund costs of $1,237,763. Prior year actual costs for FY 2020‐21 to FY 2022‐23 have ranged from $1.3‐1.4M, this budget is aligned with prior year actual costs. The $1,237,763 budget for this program includes salaries and benefits for staff, as well as materials, contract services, special projects, cost allocation, and contingencies. If the City were to eliminate this program, the City would receive immediate savings in the cuts associated with materials, contract services, special projects, cost allocation, and contingencies.  The city would not immediately realize the savings in salary and benefits.  These costs would be reallocated to other programs. Basically, the savings the city would realize immediately through eliminating this program is approximately $737,000.

Q2: The budgeted revenue on p. 516 is $145,823, while the estimated revenue is shown in the SLR Summary table as approximately $57k, which is likely what the adjusted fees have resulted in. What was the impact of the field use fee calculation adjustments the City

2 Council approved a couple of years ago? (Councilmember Moore) Staff response: The budgeted revenue on p. 516 is the partial water reimbursement from the district to the city. The estimated revenue for the water reimbursement in the 2024 adopted budget is $145,823, which is allocated to Public Works Grounds Maintenance.

The revenue estimated in the 2024 adopted budget for field use permit revenue is $150,000. $57,000 is the estimated field permit revenue currently received from just the school district fields, which is allocated to the Parks and Recreation Department. The fee adjustment by council has been impacted by the
pandemic and field closures due to rain, but the revenue is currently 2 percent more than before the adjustment. The fiscal year 22‐23 season saw 26 days of field closures due to rain.

Q3: Library maintenance, both interior and exterior is covered by the JPA along with Janitorial services. The city covers the aquarium contract which had been $36,000 annually, but the current budget shows a reduction on page 564 of $8,395, which would further reduce the General Fund Costs to $36k ‐ $8,395 = $27,605 instead of the $88,380 shown. This could be reflected in the SLR Summary? (Councilmember Moore) Staff response: All ongoing reductions approved by City Council as part of the Fiscal Year 2023‐ 24 Adopted budget are already included in the base budget.  The reduction is already reflected as the contract services budget was originally $462,881 but was adopted at $454,486 (page 564), showing the $8,395 difference.  There is no need to reflect in the SLR summary.

Q4: Several Special Projects were canceled as shown below, from the City’s Q1 update, saving about $1.2 M. That would have freed up previously assigned funds to the unassigned fund balance, can someone point to where this has been accounted for?
(Councilmember Moore)
Staff response: Any reduced expenditures in the prior fiscal year are accounted for in year‐end unaudited fund balance in their respective funds.

Q5: Here are the Special Projects the Q1 update indicate are continuing, note that about $40M has been appropriated in prior year and
current Special Projects’ budgets. Are any
of these set to be canceled? Does staff have some recommendations on which ones  could be added to the 1/17/2024 suggestions? (Councilmember Moore) Staff response: Staff reviews the special projects on a quarterly basis and at year‐end close to assess the project status and if a project should continue.  Departments reviewed these projects as part of the First Quarter Financial Report, and recommendations for eliminating some projects can be found in Attachment A. Additional reductions to City Work Program items as identified by CWP in the title will be discussed with the Council in March.

Q6: Would you please break out the bullet point services the SR2S program provides (listed below), for instance how much is the crossing guard program costing, hosting working group meetings, Earth Day, Fall Bike festival, and newsletters. 3 2016 Measure B funding for Bicycle/Pedestrian Education and encouragement was $33,060 for FY 23 as shown in the Q1 Update, November 21, 2023, PDF 55. The Safe Routes 2 School Budget Unit 100‐88‐846 mentions that “Program expenses are cost‐ recovered through Measure B grant funding.” (see page 614 of the FY 24 Adopted Budget) The Budget does not show how much of the SR2S budget is cost‐recovered specifically from Measure B, but does show $154,000 in unspecified revenue with expenditures of $732,278 and total General Fund costs of $578,278. There are no Councilmembers assigned to this group, which holds regularly scheduled monthly hybrid meetings on Zoom and in person at the city. https://www.cupertino.org/our‐ city/departments/public‐works/transportation‐mobility/safe‐routes‐2‐school There are no meeting minutes kept for the SR2S Working Group meetings. “The Cupertino Safe Routes to School Working Group is a partnership between City staff, Cupertino Union School District, Fremont Union High School District, public schools in Cupertino, parents, high school students, and community groups such as Walk Bike Cupertino and the Cupertino Rotary Club.” It appears that the City Council formed the group in 2015.  Crossing Guards
 Events
Cupertino Safe Routes to School hosts numerous events throughout the year.

 Working Group Meetings throughout the year
The Cupertino Safe Routes to School Working Group meets most months of the school year to collaborate in expanding the program.

 Earth Day Activity in April
In 2023, Safe Routes to School is organizing a walking tour of the Regnart Creek Trail in conjunction with the Cityʹs annual Earth and Arbor Day Festival. Check the Regnart Creek Trail Tour page for details.  Typically the Cupertino Safe Routes to School team hosts family‐friendly bike rides that allow participants to experience city landmarks and parks. Weʹre changing it up this year to highlight the brand new, long‐anticipated opening of the Regnart Creek Trail in the spring.

 High School Student Representative Program recruitment in the spring Cupertinoʹs Safe Routes to School program recruits high school students who are passionate about either bicycling, healthy lifestyles, accessibility, safe transportation, and/or campus safety as part of our Working Group.

 Middle School Bike Skills Workshops: June through September These bike safety workshops prepare rising 6th, 7th, and 8th graders to bike to middle school and beyond.

 Summer Bike Challenges in June and July
4 The summer is a great time to ride a bike! Explore the City, get some exercise, and have some fun while earning prizes.

Update: This program was started during the COVID 19 pandemic, when in‐ person bike events were not possible. Now that the pandemic is waning, Safe Routes to School has par tnered with the Cupertino Library to offer bike challenges through their Summer Reading Program.
 Fall Bike Fest in September
A family‐focused event that is held in the fall. Join us to enjoy a bike safety rodeo, pedal‐powered bike blender smoothies, bike decorating, bike rides, and more!
 Getting to School
The City of Cupertino strongly encourages all families to choose alternative transportation for traveling to and from school. Alternative transportation includes walking, bikin
g, carpooling, and transit. To this end, Cupertino Safe Routes to School has developed various resources to assist families in determining appropriate routes for walking and biking to school. Please reference the resources below when planning your childʹs route to school.

Below are helpful resources to assist Cupertino f amilies in making healthy and sustainable transportation decisions.

Suggested Routes to School Map for Each School
Interactive Map for Cupertino Schools
Via‐Cupertino Shuttle
The City of Cupertino collects data on how students travel to and from Cupertino schools. View the reports below to understand Cupertino student transportation trends.
 Student Travel Data Reports
 Newsletters
Stay up to date on all things Safe Routes to School. Our monthly newsletter includes infrastructure updates, upcoming events, safety tips, stories of student‐led projects, and much more! View our past newsletters here:
 Newsletters
o Receive future newsletters in your inbox by subscribing to our email list. To subscribe, enter your email into the SR2S Newsletter box here:
o E‐Notification Signup
Check out our Back to School page to make sure you are prepared to walk, bike or scooter to school:
 Back to School
Discover safety tips, videos, and much more! Learn how to become a safer pedestrian and cyclist by reviewing our Safe Routes to School educational resources.
 Resources
 Transportation Projects for Student Safety
5 Cupertino also has the Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission with expenditures of $62,715 and overlapping service objectives with SR2S. The members of the Commission are appointed by City Council and while the meetings are not recorded, or hybrid on Zoom, there are meeting minutes available.

Perhaps there is some overlap between these gr oups?
(Councilmember Moore)
Staff response:

Bike Ped Education and Education at events  $16,800
Pedestrian Education Program  $49,169
Online Outreach for Events  $500
Cost‐share of SAM insurance policy with P&R  $1,500
Crossing guard contract (does not include $40K reimbursements)  $301,293 Banners, flyers, newsletters, brochures, etc. in multiple languages  $5,8 60 Supplies for various programs  $22,465
Annual Bike Fest Event Support  $16,300
Kindergarten Education for All Schools  $11,200
The City receives reimbursements through Measure B funds for a portion of the SR2S program.

These funds vary per year, but on average the City receives approximately $47,000 annually towards the program.

The expenditures for the B
icycle and Pedestrian Commission includes salary and benefits as well as other overhead items, including materials and cost allocations. There is no overlap in the costs or services between these two programs.

Q7: Public Works: Reduce Public Works materials, and contract services and part time positions: only two examples of reductions are listed, and the total amou nt is far from $1,768,539. Can you provide more information on how the $1,768,539 is reached? (Councilmember Wei)
Staff response: See revised Attachment A for further detail.

Q8: Could you name a few cities by us that require sidewalk mainten ance  and tree maintenance paid by property owners? (Councilmember Wei) Staff response: Based on current knowledge, the following table provides information on the entity responsible for maintaining the described assets within the public right of way for neighboring Cities.

City  Sidewalk Maintenance
Responsibility
Street Tree Maintenance
Responsibility
San Jose  Property Owner  Property Owner
Campbell  City  City
Sunnyvale  Property Owner & City *  City
6 Mountain View  City  City
Palo Alto  Property Owner  City
Los Altos  Property Owner  Property Owner
Saratoga  Property Owner  Property Owner
* Sunnyvale requires pr
operty owners to maintain sidewalks where they are situated within easements.

Q9: CWP License Plate Readers Project ‐ how much is this specific project cost? (Councilmember Wei)
Staff response: The current allocated budget is $60,000 for the installation of an estimated 20 LPR Cameras. If installed, there is an ongoi ng  annual cost of $2,500 per camera (or $50,000 annually for the 20 cameras).

Q10: Reduce Funding for Partnerships: how much savings per Partner? (Councilmember Wei)
Staff response: The savings are $60,000 for the Chamber and $8,293 for Sister Cities, and $1,014 for other business memberships.

Q11: What school groun ds are covered under the field use agreement? (Vice Mayor Fruen)
Staff response: This information can be found online at https://www.cupertino.org/our‐ city/departments/parks‐recreation/reservations‐permits/sports‐fields‐courts.

Q12: How will sidewalk maintena
nce by the residents be enforced? Also need to update
in the SLR attachment to say Cupertino Union not unified. (Vice Mayor Fruen) Staff response: The City would continue to provide temporary corrections to rapidly respond to unacceptable conditions. The City would then issue letters to re sidents  notifying them of the need to perform maintenance on the sidewalk adjacent to their property and would provide a reasonable timeline for the resident to respond to the notice. Should the corrective work not be addressed in a timely manner, the city would be considering issuing code violations. The proce ss  would require a municipal code modification.

Q13: What is being reduced from Sister Cities, does this include room usage, how much does that cost the city? (Councilmember Moore)
Staff response: The current Sister City policy limits travel, which results in budget savings related to travel and gifts. The use of meeting ro om space is not included in the reductions. The policy allows for free use of meeting space for Sister City Committees each year. The cost of the maximum allowed space reservations, if exhausted, per Sister City Committee is approximately $700 per year.
7 Q14: What does the historical society contract cost the City?  Can it be included in the SLR discussions? (Councilmember Moore)
Staff response: The total grant funding provided pursuant to the agreement shall not exceed the annual sum of $40,000. The contract is currently for a three‐year term ($120,000) with an option for two addition years ($80,000) for a total sum of $200,000 over five years.

Additionally, the agreement includes 18 meeting rooms and four large rooms at the Quinlan Community Center per calendar year and the Historical Museum space at Quinlan Community Center. Depending on the time of the meeting or event and the room rented, the monetary value ranges. Meeting Room refers to the Conference Room and Large Rooms refer to the Cupertino and Social Room. The space the museum currently occupies at Quinlan Community Center is relatively the same size as the Social Room.

Q15: Can I get a listing of all contracts the City has with non‐profits? (Councilmember Chao)
Staff response: The support the City provides to non‐profits is described on the City website:
https://www.cupertino.org/our‐city/departments/finance/non‐profit‐support‐opportunities

Q16: Can we further reduce our fleet and SLR amount for ʺDefer Vehicle and Equipment Replacement? (Councilmember Moore)
Staff response: The City has already made significant reductions to this budget (approximately $693,000 over the last two years). The City could reduce this budget further; however, the State has mandated that 50% of new vehicle and equipment purchases be no‐emissions vehicles.

Currently, no‐emissions vehicles are more costly than traditional gasoline/diesel vehicles, so a certain level of funding is required in order to meet this mandate. Staff does not recommend reducing the budget for this program any further at this time.

Q17: Can we add removing AI from McClellan to the SLRs? (Councilmember Moore) Staff response: The AI project for McClellan is currently at a stage where cancellation is not feasible due to contractual obligations and the expenditure of approximately half of the $60,000 budget.

Q18: Can we get information on the Senior Center costs; what programs are funded, and which are costs recovery.  Be sure to include the travel program. (Councilmember Chao and Councilmember Moore)
Staff response: A link is provided below to a saved view on the City’s financial transparency portal showing actual revenues versus expenditures:

Senior Center

Q19: Can we get more information on the preschool program, does that costs recover? (Councilmember Moore)
8 Staff response: Preschool is 125% cost recovery.

Q20: Can we get more information on BBF and Sports center, do those costs recover? (Councilmember Chao)
Staff response: Links are provided below saved views on the City’s financial transparency portal showing actual revenues versus expenditures:

Blackberry Farm

Sports Center

Q21: I believe we continue to pay for an annual contract for legislative consultant, which was meant to support the Legislative Review Committee with almost monthly meetings.

Now that the Legislative Review Committee is decommissioned, Iʹd like to revisit this item. How much is annual contract?  (Councilmember Chao) Staff response: City currently has an agreement with the legislative consultant, Gonsalves and Sons, in the annual amount of not to exceed $56,500.

Q22: I believe the city has contracted a PR consultant last year. Do we still have continued contract on that area? If so, how much? (Councilmember Chao) Staff response: The agreement with Native Digital is in the amount of $174,732.

Q23: What other similar contracts are there under the City Managerʹs Office? (Councilmember Chao)
Staff response: There are no other PR agreements in the City Manager’s Office.

Q24: I have requested a more detailed
budget of the SR2S in the prep session, since there
has never been an update to the Council on that area. Iʹd like to know the staffing and annual budget for last year, and if possible, the last 5 years. (Councilmember Chao) Staff response:

The Safe Routes to School program meets monthly to provide information and updates on the program. Members of the public can sign up to be notified of upcoming meetings on the Safe Routes to School Working Group webpage at: https://www.cupertino.org/our‐ city/departments/public‐works/transportation‐mobility/safe‐routes‐2‐school/get‐involved/working‐ group

The Safe Routes to School Program also releases a regular newsletter with information regarding upcoming events, safety tips, stories of student‐led projects, as well as general updates regarding the program. Members of the public can sign up to receive the newsletter via email at the Safe Routes to School webpage here: https://www.cupertino.org/our‐city/departments/public‐ works/transportation‐mobility/safe‐routes‐2‐school/newsletters

9 Historical budget, actuals and staffing for the SR2S program can be found in the City’s Adopted budget book pages 614‐615. In addition, staff has created a saved view on OpenGov that shows historical budget and actual expenses and can be found here.

Q25: I have requested a more detailed budget of the Senior Center in the prep session, since there has never been an update to the Council on that area. Iʹd like to know the staffing and annual budget for last year, and if possible, the last 5 years. (Councilmember Chao)
Staff response: A link is provided below to a saved view on the City’s financial transparency portal showing actual revenues versus expenditures. Staffing information can be found in the City’s Adopted Budget:

Senior Center

Q26: Iʹd like clarification on the homeless jobs program on whether the contract is still active. Iʹd like to know what other similar grant/contract the city currently has with other nonprofit/social service organizations. Could the expenses be covered with the CDBG grant? (Councilmember Chao)
Staff response:

The contract with West Valley Community Services (WVCS) for the Homeless Jobs Program is still active. Although the program did not receive any additional funding from the City Work Program budget for FY 2023‐24, they were allowed to extend the period of performance for their previous contract to expend the remaining funds that they received through the FY 2022‐23 CWP.

The table below shows the current grants for FY 2023‐24 as adopted by City Council on May 2, 2023, other nonprofits/social service organizations for the Housing and Human Services program,

Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley
Live Oak Adult Day Services
God’s Promise
Project Sentinel
Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County
Maitri
Senior Adults Legal Assistance

The Homeless Jobs Program would be eligible for CDBG funding under the category of “public services”. However, the program would have to compete with other applicants for a limited amount of funding. In addition, CDBG public service funding is currently not available until FY 2025‐26 due to a two‐year approval cycle.

Q27: Iʹd like an update on the contract/grant for Cupertino Historic Society, which is $40,000/year, while Cupertino historically only gave a grant of $10,000 or at most $20,000 before 2019, I believe. Since the financial situation of the City is very different now, what 10 options the city has? (Councilmember Chao)
Staff response: Based on the grant funding and license agreement in place, we can renegotiate the funding reimbursement by negotiating a reduction of the obligations by the Cupertino Historical Society to the City or terminate the agreement on the 30 days’ notice clause in the contr act.

Q28: Besides the Historic Society, we learned last year that Cupertino had been giving funding to Shakespeare in the Park, a fantastic program. But the city will likely be stopping that funding. In the spirit of fairness, Iʹd like to know what other contracts (funding in that format) the city has with other o rganizations? Iʹd like to explore what services they are providing and whether there is potential to obtain other sources of grant funding. (Councilmember Chao)
Staff response: The Parks and Recreation Department has two of these funding formats and they are the Historical Society and Shakespea re in the Park.

Q29: For the last item in the table, ʺEliminate select city work programʺ. Some of those were programs from last year. Could you provide an update on the program, when did it starts. and the budget for each item being considered for elimination.  (Councilmember Chao)
Staff respons
e: The start date, status, and budget of the city work program items recommended for elimination in Attachment A can be viewed on the City Work Program Dashboard at cupertino.org/cityworkprogram. Additionally, the License Plate Readers project has been on hold due to the County revising their policies on usage for LPR. Also, the Regulating Diversified Retail project was not identified as a priority item by Council during the prioritization session for FY 23‐

24. Attachments Provided with Original Staff Report:

A. Potential Service‐Level Reductions Summary
CC 1-17-2024

#1

Fiscal Year 2024-25
Potential Service-Level
Reductions

Amended Attachment A -
Potential Service-Level
Reductions Summary

Potential Service-Level Reductions (SLR) Summary Attachment A Grouping Department Service-Level Reductions Fiscal Impact Full-Time Staffing
Impact (FTE)
Service Level Impact Narrative
Operations and Maintenance Public Works Reduce Public Works Materials and Contract Services and Part-
Time Positions
$ 1,768,539 None Some contracts for general services, such as park tree maintenance ($168,880), will move in-house, extending maintenance timelines; reduction in Public Works Part- time Positions ($352,136), reduction in storm drain inspection contract services due to the purchase of the rovver x ($230,000), sidewalk curb and gutter service reductions ($338,000), elimination of the Sherriff Work Program ($85,000). Additional base budget reductions in materials and contract services across 60 programs within the Public Works Department (approx. $600,000).

Operations and Maintenance Various Shift Credit Card Fees to Customers
$ 432,668 None Customers would pay a credit card transaction fee for any payments made using a credit card. Currently, the City does not charge credit card fees to customers. Many jurisdictions charge customers a credit card transaction fee for any payments made using a credit card.

Operations and Maintenance City Manager's
Office/Community
Development
Reduce Part-Time Staffing,
Reclassify Positions and Reduce
Recruitment Advertising
$ 286,348 None The CMO reclassified the Communications Manager to a lower level position. This will result in decreased capacity in the Communications Division.

Reduction of part-time positions in CMO and CDD. This could result in reduced administrative and communications support in CMO. This could cause a delay and decrease in the operations of the permit counter and the ability to provide historic levels of customer service to resident and community members on all matters related to the Community Development Department.

Operations and Maintenance Parks & Recreation Reduce Funding for Library Extra Hours
$ 160,000 None No immediate impact. The City has historically budgeted for increased library hours.

This reduction will have no immediate impact to current operational hours, since Santa Clara County Library District has historically received funds from the state to cover these costs and has not been charging the City for 12 additional operating hours per week. If state funds are discontinued, this will become a true service level reduction.

Operations and Maintenance Public Works Reduce Impec Janitorial Contract $ 100,000 None Further reductions in cleaning frequency for City facilities. Reduced cleaning has a direct impact on user experience and leads to quicker degredation of facility infrastructure.

Operations and Maintenance City Manager's
Office
Reduce Scene from 10 months to
quarterly
$ 92,400 None Reduction results in less promotion of City services and less community outreach opportunities.

Operations and Maintenance Administrative
Services
Reduce Budget for Internal Audit $ 70,000 None Reduction in the number of internal audit projects. Audits would occur on a less frequent basis.

Operations and Maintenance Public Works Reduce Crossing Guard Services $ 50,000 None Reduction in the number of intersections served by crossing guards. The City currently receives $20K from FUHSD and $20K from CUSD. High schools could be eliminated from the crossing guard contract, resulting in a reduction of approximately $70K, but could lose the $20K from FUHSD ($50K savings). Enhancing cost sharing could result in reducing expenditures.

Operations and Maintenance Parks & Recreation Reduce Parks & Recreation Expenses
$ 33,619 None Elimination of the Poet Laureate Program and Helping Hands Program. Reduce part- time staff for the preschool program, with a shift in focus to a more robust Tiny Tots (3 year old) program.
1 of 4
Potential Service-Level Reductions (SLR) Summary Attachment A Grouping Department Service-Level Reductions Fiscal Impact Full-Time Staffing
Impact (FTE)
Service Level Impact Narrative
Operations and Maintenance Parks & Recreation Reduce Park Ranger Services $ 31,155 None Reduction in hours planned for part-time rangers at the Stevens Creek Corridor and McClellan Ranch Preserve, resulting in a reduced ranger presence at the Environmental Education Center and for some of the nature based programs and events.

Operations and Maintenance City Manager's
Office
Eliminate Minimum Wage Mailers $ 23,202 None The City currently prints and mails minimum wage information to businesses. This reduction would result in emailed forms, requiring businesses to print on their own.

Operations and Maintenance Parks & Recreation Reduce Senior Center Part-Time Staffing and Supplies
$ 21,748 None Reduction in hours planned for part-time staff at the Senior Center resulting in longer wait times for customers at the counter, reduced rental support, and reduced amenities in programs and events.

Operations and Maintenance Administrative
Services/
Community
Development
Reduce Conferences and Training $ 11,046 None The decrease in conference attendance and training opportunities for staff might result in staff being less updated on current changes, new developments, and best practices within their field. The reduction could potentially lead to higher staff turnover rates.

Infrastructure Capital
Improvement
Program
Reduce General Fund Transfers to
the Capital Improvement Fund
$ 2,000,000 2 City will initiate and complete CIP projects with the current Capital Reserve fund.

The City will initiate only critical health and safety projects, or projects that will create revenue or savings to the City budget. A reduction in capital renewal will lead to a longterm aging of infrastructure impacting the attractiveness of this infrastructure to the public.

Infrastructure Public Works Shift Sidewalk Maintenance to Property Owners1
$ 1,000,000 1.4 The California Streets and Highway Code sections 5610-5618 assigns responsibility for sidewalks to the adjacent property owner. Cupertino has historically assumed the costs of this work. This proposal will eliminate this service and shift sidewalk maintenance responsibilities to adjacent property owners. This practice is fairly standard across the region.

Infrastructure Public Works Shift School District Grounds Maintenance to School District1
$ 737,394 4.2 This reduction would end the field maintenance agreement with the Cupertino Union School District. The school districts would need to take on the maintenance responsibilities. The City would forego revenue (approximately $57K) from field rentals and the school district could potentially add revenue.

Infrastructure Public Works Shift Street Tree Maintenance to Property Owners1
$ 455,008 3 Similar to sidewalk maintenance, street tree maintenance responsibility could shift to adjacent property owners. This practice is fairly standard across the region.

Infrastructure Public Works Defer Vehicle and Equipment Replacement
$ 180,000 None Defer vehicle and equipment replacements until future years (increasing the replacement cycle from approximately 7 years to 10 years on average). Additionally, reducing the overall size of the City fleet. This may increase cost and staff time to repair assets that were deferred for replacements.
2 of 4
Potential Service-Level Reductions (SLR) Summary Attachment A Grouping Department Service-Level Reductions Fiscal Impact Full-Time Staffing
Impact (FTE)
Service Level Impact Narrative
Fiscal Accountability Law Enforcement Align Law Enforcement Budget with Actuals
$ 1,000,000 None Over the last year and a half, the Sheriff's Office has provided significantly less service than allowed under the budget with no apparent impact to crime. This reduction aligns the budget with the actual hours provided.

Fiscal Accountability Innovation &
Technology
Reduce Budget for IT $ 779,187 None Reduced applications utilized by City staff; Cancelled ERP Implementation; Prolonged tech refresh cycles; Significantly reduced replacement parts and supplies, Reduced outside expert technical support. This reduction would reduce efficiencies from some technology uses where the city has historically been comparatively advanced.

Fiscal Accountability Public Works Utility True-up $ 398,407 None Reduction aligns budget with actuals Fiscal Accountability City Attorney's
Office
Align City Attorney's Office
Contract Services and Materials
with Actuals
$ 226,561 None Reduction aligns budget with FY 2023-24 Actuals. Specialized outside counsel and legal services are necessary to cover specialized legal representation and services.

Fiscal Accountability Parks & Recreation Consolidate Learn to Swim Program
$ 87,118 None Consolidate the Learn to Swim program into 100-63-612 under BBF, due to the program now being run from the BBF Pool and fully integrated into those operations.

Consolidated part-time staff and program supplies and expenses into that program.

Fiscal Accountability Administrative
Services
Reduce Unemployment Insurance $ 64,148 None New costs are reflective of post-COVID estimates Community Benefit Parks &
Recreation/Public
Works
Reduce 4th of July Funding $ 138,000 None Elimination of 4th of July evening fireworks due to the significant cost of the event, including the fireworks, sheriff cost, and rental of equipment needed, as well as staff time needed.

Community Benefit Council Reduce Funding for Partnerships $ 69,307 None Reduction in funding for partnerships including Chamber and Sister Cities.

Reduction in cross cultural exchange and economic development opportunities.

Community Benefit City Manager's
Office
Reduce City Events/Outreach $ 63,166 None Reduction in City events and outreach including the Community Academy, Public Safety Forum, State of the City, and CREST. Reduction could limit community outreach about public safety, law enforcement, Council goals and initiatives.

Community Benefit Parks & Recreation Reduce Budget for Paid Events $ 38,675 None Reduction in part-time staffing scheduled for these events and program (e.g., Spelling Bee and Hack Cupertino). Will continue to offer current programs, but support with more volunteers and full-time staff.

Community Benefit Parks & Recreation Shift Sheriff Fees for Festivals to Festival Organizers
$ 34,992 None Sheriff expenses for festivals will no longer be covered by the City and will be charged directly to festival organizers starting in FY 2024-25.

Community Benefit Parks & Recreation Reduce Budget for Concerts and Movies
$ 25,424 None Consolidation of the Neighborhood Events program to reduce part-time staffing expenses and the reallocation of some events such as movies and band performances to Memorial Park.

Community Benefit Public Works Eliminate Earth Day Festival $ 19,126 None Direct impact to quality of life through community events. Less opportunity for the City to advance goals, especially community outreach, around the Climate Action Plan. Staff time is not included within the Fiscal Impact number. 3 of 4 Potential Service-Level Reductions (SLR) Summary Attachment A Grouping Department Service-Level Reductions Fiscal Impact Full-Time Staffing
Impact (FTE)
Service Level Impact Narrative
Community Benefit City Manager's
Office
Eliminate Select City Work
Program Projects
$ 75,000 None Elimination of the CWP Enhance the Block Leader Program (grants to Block Leaders for community events), CWP Regulate Diversified Retail, and CWP License Plate Readers projects. Reduction in engagement with community. Reduction in retail diversity. Reduction in support for law enforcement to locate vehicles and suspects associated with criminal activity.
$ 10,472,238 10.6
1 Reduction will take place over time. Staffing reduction will be through attrition as positions become vacant. 4 of 4
CC 1-17-2024
#5
2024 Council Committee
Assignments
Attachment A - Draft 2024
Council Committee
Assignments
Supplemental Report
Draft 2024 Council Committees
Council Committees 2024 Representative Meetings*
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) JR Fruen - Primary Annually in April or May Hung Wei - Alternate Bay Area Metro Center
Yerba Buena Conference Room
375 Beale Street
San Francisco, California
Kitt
y Moore - Primary 3-4 times a year
JR Fruen - Alternate Sounty of Santa Clara, Board of Supervisors’ Chambers, County Government Center – 70 West
Hedding Street, 1st Floor, San Jose, CA 95110
6:15pm
Historical Society Advisory Council Hung Wei - Primary 3rd Wednesday of the month at 4:30 p.m.

Liang Chao - Alternate Cupertino Chamber of Commerce
(hybrid in-person/zoom if possible)
Silicon Valley Regional Interoperability Authority (SVRIA) Liang Chao - Primary Every two months on the 4th Wednesday of the mont h Kitty Moore - Alternate Santa Clara PD
601 El Camino, Santa Clara
Santa Clara County Cities Association - Board of Directors Sheila Mohan -Primary Monthly on the 2nd Thursday of the Month JR Fruen - Alternate 7pm at Sunnyvale City Hall, West conference Room 456 W Olive Ave, Sunnyvale 94086
Santa Clara County Cities Association - City Selection Committee Sheila Mohan-Primary JR Fruen - Alternate
As needed and will be held before Board Meeting on
2nd Thursday of the Month
6pm at Sunnyvale City Hall, West conference Room
456 W Olive Ave, Sunnyvale 94086
Santa Clara County Cities Association - Legislative Committee JR Fruen - Primary As needed Sheila Mohan - Alternate 6pm at Sunnyvale City Hall, West conference Room 456 W Olive Ave, Sunnyvale 94086
County of Santa Clara Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee
Draft 2024 Council Committees
Council Committees 2024 Representative Meetings*
Santa Clara County Library District Joint Powers Authority - Board of Directors Kitty Moore - Primary Quarterly Sheila Mohan - Alternate 1:30pm at Library Services & Support Center 1370 Dell Ave., Campbell, CA 95008
Santa Clara Valley Water Commission JR Fruen - Primary Quarterly on the 4th Wednesday of the Month Kitty Moore - Alternate Times and locations vary each month Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (PAC) JR Fruen - Primary Monthly on the 2nd Thursday of the Month Policy Advisory Committee Hung Wei - Alternate 4pm at VTA River Oaks Campus 3331 North First Street, Conference Room B-106
School Partnership and School Liaison Hung Wei - Primary Quarterly (CUSD, FUHSD, De-Anza CC) Liang Chao - Alternate Quinlan Community Center West Valley Mayors and City Managers Sheila Mohan - Primary Monthly on the 4th Wednesday of the Month JR Fruen - Alternate 12pm
Location changes monthly
State Route 85 Corridor Policy Advisory Board Hung Wei - Primary Quarterly on a Monday of the month selected Kitty Moore - Alternate 10am
Location changes each quarter
Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority (SVCEA) JPA Sheila Mohan - Primary Monthly on the 2nd Wednesday of the month Hung Wei - Alternate 7pm
Cupertino Community Hall
Stevens Creek Corridor Transit Steering Committee Hung Wei - Primary Corridor Tour - Feb. 7 or 8 (9-12) Kitty Moore - Alternate SC Meeting 3: mid-late February SC Meeting 4: mid May (Before Memorial Day)
SC Meeting 5: early - mid Sept (after Labor Day)
Draft 2024 Council Committees
Council Committees 2024 Representative Meetings*
Audit Committee (City of Cupertino) Sheila Mohan and Meets monthly, usually 4th Monday of month Hung Wei City Hall
4pm-6pm in Conference Room A
Disaster Council (Cupertino) Liang Chao - Primary Quarterly on 3rd Thursday of the Month Kitty Moore - Alternate City Hall
2pm in EOC
Sister City Committees Hung Wei - Primary As needed
Kitty Moore - Alternate City Hall
* When in-person, otherwise by videoconference.

CC 1-17-2024

#12

Municipal Code
Amendments Two-Story
Permits and Accessory
Dwelling Units

Supplemental Report

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SUPPLEMENTAL 1
Meeting: January 17, 2024

Agenda Item #12

Subject
Consider Proposed amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 19.12, Chapter 19.28 and Chapter 19.112 regarding Two‐Story Permit and Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) laws. (Application No. MCA‐2023‐002; Applicant: City of Cupertino; Location: City‐wide)

Recommended Action
Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 23‐2254: ʺAn Ordinance of The City Council of the City of Cupertino to amend Municipal Code Chapter 19.12, Chapter 19.28 and Chapter 19.112 Regarding Two‐Story Permit and Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Lawsʺ (Attachment A) to amend the following:
a. Chapter 19.12, Administration, and
b. Chapter 19.28 Single‐Family Residential (R‐1) Zones. c. Chapter 19.112, Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)

Background:

Staff’s responses to questions received from councilmember are shown in italics.

Q1: Councilmember question (Councilmember Chao)
I would like to know whether each of this request (about emails submitted by Peggy Griffith on January 15, 2024, as well as an email from Jennifer Griffin on January 16, 2024) is legally permissible in the Cityʹs Muni Code. If the information is available on the options chosen by other cities, I would like to know. Note that I may or may not agree with all of the requests below. But I do wish to know if each of them is a viable option for the Council to consider.

Staff response: The amendments to CMC 19.112, Accessory Dwelling Units, are reflective of State mandates for their development, as well as modifications proposed by the Planning Commission at their scheduled hearing on November 14, 2023. Below is a summary of response in regard to the emails submitted by members of the public:

 Separate Sale of ADUs: Although the AB 1033 gives the option for local jurisdictions to sell ADUs as separate units as condominiums, the current recommendation is that City Council does not allow this.
  Owner Occupancy of Principle Unit: Under AB 976, the State does not permit local jurisdictions to implement an owner occupancy requirement to allow ADUs on a particular parcel.
 Short Term Rentals of ADUs: Currently, the Cupertino Municipal Code, as well as State law, does not permit ADUs to be used as Short‐Term Rentals. Please refer to CMC 19.112.020(4) for more information.
 Multi‐level ADUs: The State allows for ADUs to be up to two stories. The amendments to the Municipal Code do not recommend any ADU to be more than two stories.
 Rooftop Equipment: The city cannot impose any development standards on statewide/streamlined ADUs. However, the city does implement noise standards for AC units and other similar structures based on the City’s Noise Ordinance.  Balconies and Windowsills: The City cannot impose any development standards on statewide/streamlined ADUs.

Attachments Provided with the Original Staff Report:

A. Draft Ordinance No. 23‐2254 (clean)
B. Draft Ordinance No. 23‐2254 (redline)
C. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023‐17
D. Gov. Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22
E. Public Comment

CC 1-17-2024

#13

Council Report

Amended Attachment C -
Council Reports, Moore

Supplemental Report
1 CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITY REPORT Meeting: Click or tap to enter a date. Reporting Councilmember: Councilmember Kitty Moore Report Activity Dates: 11/28/23 to 1/8/24 Event Date, Title, and Description: December 1, 2023. City of Cupertino Tree Lighting at the Quinlan Center. Parks and Recreation Director Sander led an excellent celebration with music, crafts, Gogo Biblio, and a special visitor. December 4, 2023. Prep. Session on Revenue tax measures. December 5, 2023. City Council Meeting. December 9, 2023 – December 15, 2023. Wrap up of Environmental Studies courses finals Environmental Resource Management and Pollution Prevention and Environmental Resource Management and Pollution Prevention Lab. 9 courses in certificate program, A+ avg. Self-funded. December 11, 2023. 1:1 with City Manager. December 14, 2023. City Council reorganization. December 16, 2023. Visited Wreaths Across America. Meeting with Rep. Ro Khanna and office administrative staff. December 18, 2023. 1:1 with City Manager. Silicon Valley Hopper Ribbon Cutting with Santa Clara Councilmembers and Staff leaders from both cities who coordinated this program.

City Council Councilmember Activity Report
2 https://www.santaclaraca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/44837/3171 How to access SV Hopper: https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/public-works/transportation-mobility/community-shuttle December 19, 2023. City Council closed session. December 21, 2023. Hsinchu Sister City visit and tour. December 22, 2023. Submitted budget questions. January 4, 2024. CalCities committee introductions. 4th year accepted to the CalCities Environmental Quality Policy Committee which includes councilmembers from across the state. January 5, 2024. Group Chat: Governance vs. Politics, Social Prosperity Partners. Councilmembers and other nationwide community leaders discuss governance vs. politics. January 8, 2024. Begin Winter quarter Environmental Studies courses: very special thank you to Prof. Jeff Staudinger for excellent environmental instruction and caring guidance. Current courses: Environmental Management Tools: Environmental Management Systems & Environmental Performance Reporting and Environmental Resource Mgmt & Pollution Prevention: Air, Water & Land. Self-funded. Respectfully submitted in Memory of Professor Jeff Staudinger, PE, CHMM.

CC 1-17-2024

#’s 15-18

Treasurer's Reports

Supplemental Report
1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DESK ITEM
Meeting: January 17, 2024

Agenda Items #15‐18

Subject
Receive the Monthly Treasurerʹs Investment Report for November 2023 Receive the Monthly Treasurerʹs Report for November 2023 Receive the Monthly Treasurerʹs Investment Report for December 2023 Receive the Monthly Treasurerʹs Report for December 2023

Recommended Action
Receive the Monthly Treasurerʹs Investment Report for November 2023 Receive the Monthly Treasurerʹs Report for November 2023 Receive the Monthly Treasurerʹs Investment Report for December 2023 Receive the Monthly Treasurerʹs Report for December 2023

Background:

Staff’s responses to questions received from councilmember are shown in italics.

Q1: The city has stopped paying Apple (BAZ INDUSTRIES) its 35% sales tax portion from the start of the 2023 sales tax period.  This amount adds up to MILLIONS of dollars by now.  Months ago, when this payment to Apple (BAZ) was stopped, staff said that they were setting aside Apple’s share (35%) in a fund. Where is this Apple money being stored i.e. what fund is it being kept in?  (Councilmember Chao and Mayor Mohan) Staff response:

Funds  yet  to  be  remitted  to  Apple  are  currently  accounted  for  in  a  liability  account  within  the General Fund.

Q2: Why is this not showing up on the Monthly Treasurer’s Reports? (Councilmember Chao and Mayor Mohan)
Staff response:

The liability is recorded as an accounting transaction, which would not be reflected in the Monthly Treasurer’s Report.

2 Q3: Council had been receiving what had been a complete list of investments as you can see from the June 27, 2022 Audit Committee report, however at the start of 2023 Council removed the Audit Committee’s authority to review the Monthly Investment reports and instead they go directly to Council and are put under Informational Items, and what has been provided was abbreviated and no longer following the requirements.

To make prudent financial decisions, the Council needs to be informed of our financial condition, please provide the fund balances and transactions for all of the accounts per Ca Gov Code 53607 and CMC 2.24.050.

See the change below:

2022 provided documents included balances for ALL
accounts:

2022 provided documents to Council only include ONE
account, see 15 and 17 below:

3 As stated above, in order to make prudent financial decisions, the Council needs to be informed of our financial condition, please provide the fund balances and transactions for all of the accounts per Ca Gov Code 53607 and CMC 2.24.050.

“On May 19, 2022, the City Council approved the City Investment Policy. Per the City’s Investment Policy, the Treasurer shall submit monthly transaction reports to the City Council within 30 days of the end of the reporting period per California Government Code Section 53607. In addition to the monthly transaction reports, quarterly investment reports are submitted to the City Council approximately 45 days following the end of the quarter. The quarterly investment report offers a more extensive discussion of the City’s economy, cash flow, and investments. The City’s Municipal Code Section 2.24.050 Investment Authority states that the Treasurer shall make a monthly report of all investment transactions to the City Council.” (see attached June 27, 2022 Staff Report).

Additionally, here is the Cupertino Municipal Code requirement for the monthly reports:

2.24.050 Investment Authority.

Pursuant to authority granted by state statutes, there is hereby delegated to the Treasurer the authority to invest or to reinvest funds of the City, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, and who shall thereafter assume full responsibility for such transactions until such time as the delegation of authority is revoked. The Treasurer shall make a monthly report of all such transactions to the members of the City Council, the City Manager and also make it available for review by such other persons who may so request.

4 (Councilmember Moore)
Staff response: The City is in compliance with both GC 53607 and CMC 2.24.050. Fund balances for all  funds  are  included  monthly  with  the  Monthly  Treasurer’s  Reports  (see  items  16  and  18  of  the January 17, 2024, City Council Meeting Agenda). Transaction reports are included in the Treasurer’s Monthly  Investment  Report  (see  items  15  and  17  of  the  January  17,  2024,  City  Council  Meeting Agenda).

Attachments Provided with Original Staff Report:

A – Chandler Investment Report November 2023
A – Report of City‐wide Receipts, Disbursements, and Cash Balances November 2023 B – Report of City‐wide Fund Balances/Net Position November 2023 A – Chandler Investment Report December 2023
A – Report of City‐wide Receipts, Disbursements, and Cash Balances December 2023 B – Report of City‐wide Fund Balances/Net Position December 2023

← All documents from this meeting