Written Communications (Updated 3-22-2024) — Cupertino City Council, March 19, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

I urge you to postpone the allocation of funds for this project and to gather more input from the community before proceeding further.

Please ensure that my comments are included in the public record.

Thank you,
Yang
From: Yang, Shenglin
To: City Council
Subject: Opposed to the idea of changing of traffic lane change on Bollinger Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:02:13 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear city council,

I am a resident living around Bollinger and Miller area. It is a shock to hear that the city is discussing to change the traffic lane on Bollinger road between De Anza & Lawrence to single-lane. This is a terrible proposal. I commute on this route every single day. The current traffic in this area is already pretty bad during rush hour. The back up is really bad even with the current 2-lane condition. Can not image the traffic congestion with this change. Very doubt that the person made this unthoughtful proposal has any real experience.

Always heard city is tight on finance and there are so many thing city can do to benefit the residents.

Why spend money on this atrocious idea.

We strongly opposed to the idea to this traffic lane change. Please consider our residents’ request/input before making any decisions.

Thanks,

Shenglin
From: Yanghong Zhong
To: City Clerk; City Council
Subject: Re: 3-19-2024 City Council Agenda Item #1 CIP - Bollinger Project Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:32:44 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
hi city council
Please Delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design and wait for more residential comment.
single lanes could make the daily commute very difficult, my kids late for school twice, because city road maintenance last year, if bollinger change to single lane, then many kids will fail.
also this is important daily commute road, distribute traffic from steven creek blvd , make cupertino engineers save lots time on commute.

Please put my comments into the public record.
have a great day
Byron
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 2:40 PM Yanghong Zhong <[email protected] > wrote:
hi city council
The Bollinger Road is a major commuting road with double lanes on both sides I I live in that aera, bollinger is everyday commute and school road for me..

I see the proposal is
Alternative A: Lane ConversionBollinger Road would be reduced from 4 lanes to 2 lanes (l lane in each direction), creatingspace for a continuous two-way left-furn lane or median, improved pedestrian crossings, andimproved bicycle facility.

Alternative B: Maintain Existing Lanes
Bollinger Road would maintain the existing 4 lanes.

I recommend you re-consider PLAN A, I would prefer PLAN B single lanes could make the daily commute very difficult, my kids late for school twice, because city road maintenance last year, if bollinger change to single lane, then many kids will fail.
also this is important daily commute road, distribute traffic from steven creek blvd , make cupertino engineers save lots time on commute.
--
Byron Zhong
Enjoy Your EveryDays
--
Byron Zhong
Enjoy Your EveryDays
From: Yanghong Zhong
To: City Clerk; City Council
Subject: 3-19-2024 City Council Agenda Item #1 CIP - Bollinger Project Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:40:45 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
hi city council
The Bollinger Road is a major commuting road with double lanes on both sides I I live in that aera, bollinger is everyday commute and school road for me..

Alternative B: Maintain Existing Lanes
Bollinger Road would maintain the existing 4 lanes.

I recommend you re-consider PLAN A, I would prefer PLAN B single lanes could make the daily commute very difficult, my kids late for school twice, because city road maintenance last year, if bollinger change to single lane, then many kids will fail.
also this is important daily commute road, distribute traffic from steven creek blvd , make cupertino engineers save lots time on commute.
--
Byron Zhong
Enjoy Your EveryDays
From: Yao Xia
To: City Council
Subject: Delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date: Monday, March 18, 2024 9:36:24 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please Delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design.

Bollinger road is very busy during traffic hours! It's not a good idea to change bollinger road to a single lane
road. People will get stuck in the traffic!
Please put my comments into the public record.

Thank you!
Yao
From: Ying LIU
To: City Clerk
Subject: About changing bollinger road to single lane
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:24:27 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please Delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design.

Please put my comments into the public record.

It is wast of money.

Can not believe whoese ideal is it?
What a terrible impact this will have on residents and all others.

Yours,
Ying
From: Ying LIU
To: City Council
Subject: Change bollinger road to single lane
Date: Monday, March 18, 2024 9:34:49 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi,
Please Delay the funding of the Bollinger Road Corridor Design.

Please put my comments into the public record.

It is wast of money.

Can not believe whoese ideal is it?
Yours,
Ying
From: Yingfeng Su
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Re: Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:57:29 AM
Attachments: image.png
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Just to add, I live at Bollinger & Miller intersection. The map below is my bike path (actually it was my actual commute to work today, 3/19 Tuesday). Due to the river, I don’t really have a safe alternative path for this section without significantly lengthening my route. — Yingfeng Su

> On Mar 19, 2024, at 11:48 AM, Yingfeng Su <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, > I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. >
> I’m a bike commuter who uses Bollinger every day and it doesn’t feel safe especially at those curves around the river and Blaney. Cars cut corners and speed thru them, and there is zero protection for bike lane. I would like to see a study, and eventually some improvements done to improve the bike safety on that road. Even a small section of barriers that seperate bike lane from car lanes help a lot. I know car drivers don’t like it, but there should be a balance to keep both groups of users happy — I myself both drive and bike. >
> The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars.
>
> Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected. This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street. >
> The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds. This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that. >
> Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino.

From: Yingfeng Su
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Keep Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:48:50 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, I ask today that you support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work.

I’m a bike commuter who uses Bollinger every day and it doesn’t feel safe especially at those curves around the river and Blaney. Cars cut corners and speed thru them, and there is zero protection for bike lane. I would like to see a study, and eventually some improvements done to improve the bike safety on that road. Even a small section of barriers that seperate bike lane from car lanes help a lot. I know car drivers don’t like it, but there should be a balance to keep both groups of users happy — I myself both drive and bike.

The Bollinger Road Study is necessary to address the many safety issues on that Road, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school. Many of the residents on Bollinger even struggle to get out of their own driveways safely because of the fast moving cars.

Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic flow for cars will be affected.

This CIP item will not reduce lanes, it only funds a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. It does not fund any construction work on that street.

The traffic study and design work are completely funded by a grant except for the required 20% matching funds.

This is a great way to leverage our budget to meet our goals. Our budget should reflect that we prioritize the safety of our residents, and this project does that.

Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino.

From: Yuhong Sheng
To: City Clerk; City Council
Subject: postpone the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:10:47 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello there,
My name is Yuhong Sheng and I have been living in Cupertino as a citizen for more than 15 years.

I am so shocked to become aware of the proposed plan to reduce Bolliger Road to one lane in each direction, and I am writing to express my strong opposition to this idea.

Bolliger Road is a vital thoroughfare in our community, particularly given its proximity to several schools. Implementing this change would undoubtedly exacerbate traffic congestion, leading to increased stress levels and a higher likelihood of accidents. Furthermore, such a modification poses significant risks to both motorists and cyclists alike.

I urge you to reconsider this plan and halt any further progress on it. Preserving the current configuration of Bolliger Road is crucial for maintaining safety and efficiency in our neighborhood.

Please put my comments into the public record.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Yuhong
From: Connie Cunningham
To: City Clerk
Subject: 24-3-19 CC Agenda Item 8 Public Comments
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 8:42:58 PM
Attachments: 24-3-19 CC Agenda Item 8 City Owned Property.docx CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 24-3-19 CC Agenda Item 8 Public Comments
Please add my written comments, that I spoke verbally, to the record for this Council meeting.

Sincerely,
Connie Cunningham
Cupertino City Council Meeting
03192024
CIP Study Session - Bollinger Road Corridor Design Council participation time - raise your hand if you know where this intersection is.

Show pics of the Alderbrook Lane/Bollinger intersection

1. Whenonestopstheircaratthelimitlinetheviewrightisclear-noticethered curb/no parking sign and bus stop,

2. NownoticethoughthereisveryLITTLEvisibilitytowardstheleftside,soonemay creep out just a bit,

3. Ifthedriverdoesn'tlookrightbeforecreepingoutforleft-sidevisibilitythenyou may actually put a bicyclist or a pedestrian, in harms' way

4. Note the curb cut on Bollinger, and the red painted curb (l believe the curb cut was to make the right turn onto Alderbrook (from Bollinger) less harsh - and that is helpful,

5. But often times, there is an oversized vehicle parked legally in the curb cut which makes clear visibility extremely hard,

6. So then you have to go wayyyyyy out in order to have a safe line of sight, which means left hand turners from Bollinger onto Alderbrook have to turn very wide, again creating a less-than-safe maneuver.

I encourage the City Council this evening to include the Bollinger Road Corridor Design in the CIP budget this year. There is a need for safety here, as well as traffic management. If we don't include this item in the CIP then we lose the eighty (80) percent match we have been granted.

That match means for the 5106K the city spends towards this study they'll get and additional 9400 K in benefit. I would give my eyetooth for a 1:4 return on investment.

And besides - who doesn't like a sale? Please do right for us neighbors and contract the study of possible changes to improve pedestrian, cyclist and driver safety. ' Thanks!
[email protected]

, 1. 0, aal
i % R ." i
a 'i "i+0,' a j,
'a" tllar i
'. 1 s
SX. S
X S
11 A
'1117
i
I '-ai
06 i A
f I I
ll'll 'a' I " " "
l
n"i I '1 i I ;li" ' I '1

From: Shenghua(Daniel) Wan
To: City Clerk
Subject: Oppose to Bolinger lane changes
Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 8:59:34 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi, Cupertino officer
My family lives near Bolinger and have to use this road for commute. Reducing the lanes on this street will aggravate the traffic to jam state. The traffic on this street has been already in a bad shape! You should create more lanes rather than reducing them.
--
Regards,
Shenghua (Daniel) Wan
From: Sophia Chan
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 8:01:49 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Mohan, Councilmembers and City Manager Wu,
Please support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work.

I am an active member in the middle school (CUSD) and high school (FUHSD) community.

Recently Cupertino has done an amazing job with projects aimed at improving the roads to accommodate for bicycles and pedestrians.

Being on the SR2S work group, I am able to see many of these positive improvements.

Some community members have raised concerns about Bollinger Road. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds.

This CIP item is about safety, though, and not just traffic throughput. There have been two fatalities on Bollinger Avenue in the past few years, and collisions and near-misses. This analysis and design will positively impact the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High.

Our budget can go farther and still meet our goals of improved safety for our residents. Please let this remain on the CIP list for this coming year.

Thank you considering my input, and for your work on behalf of Cupertino.

Best regards,
Sophia Chan
From: Juno
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 7:50:14 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honored Mayor Mohan, Councilmembers and City Manager Wu, I ask you to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work.

Some community members, many not from Cupertino, have raised fears that traffic throughput will change. This CIP item doesn't approve construction, but only funds a portion of a traffic study and explores designs that could improve resident safety. Eighty percent of the study is even paid for through a grant, so we are really leveraging our city funds.

Our budget can go farther and still meet our goals of improved safety for our residents. Please let this remain on the CIP list for this coming year.

Thank you considering my input, and for your work on behalf of Cupertino.

Safer streets for both young and old
are important for the community to
encourage more healthier forms of transportation and a more healthy community.

Thank you
Emory Chow
Emeritus citizen since 1958
Sent from my iPhone
From: Christine Cheng
To: Melissa Robertson
Cc: City Council; City Clerk; Pamela Wu; Matt Morley
Subject: Re: Please support Alternative B on Bollinger Road.

Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 7:49:23 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council members,
Another consideration for you to support Alternative B is that the Rise project(previously Vallco) will definitely increase the traffic on Bollinger Road. Please make sure that the roads close to the Rise project will be able to accommodate At Least double the number of current drivers in the near future. Otherwise few people will want to live in the Rise or near Bollinger road if it’s even more congested.

Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Christine, Jane, Adalia & Issac
Cupertino residents for 20+ years
> On Mar 19, 2024, at 1:55 PM, Melissa Robertson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Good afternoon (Council Bcc’d),
>
> Your comments have been received and will be included with the written communications for the March 19 City Council meeting, item 1 study session.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Melissa Robertson
> Administrative Assistant
> City Manager's Office
> [email protected]
> (408)777-3148
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christine Cheng <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:41 PM
> To: City Council <[email protected]>
> Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>
> Subject: Please support Alternative B on Bollinger Road. >
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
> Dear City Council members,
>
> We are very concerned that there’s a suggestion to convert the Bollinger Road from four lanes to two lanes.

Bollinger Road has already been a busy road with a lot of cars, especially during commute time. The traffic caused by lane reduction will negatively impact people’s lives. Pedestrian & bicycle safety can be done by s few spot adjustment, there is no need to do the lane reduction for the road. >
> The pros far outweigh the cons to keep the way it is. Please don’t do lane conversion!! >
> Thank you very much for your understanding and support! >
> Regards,
>
> Christine, Jane, Adalia & Isaac
> Cupertino residents for 20+ years
>
From: Connie Cunningham
To: City Clerk
Cc: City Council; Pamela Wu
Subject: 24-3-19 CC Please add to comments for Agenda Item 11 Informational Memorandum on The Rise Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 7:36:25 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
24-3-19 CC Please add to comments for Agenda Item 11 Informational Memorandum on The Rise
I presented this information under Oral Communications.

Thank you.

Connie Cunningham
Good evening, Mayor Mohan, Vice Mayor Fruen, Councilmembers, City Manager:

My letter was published 3/17/2024 in the San Jose Mercury News. I want to share it with those who may not have seen the paper this past Sunday.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Development must take steps to protect birds
Re: “City OKs new neighborhood plan at site of old mall” (Page B1, Feb. 22).

Although I support The Rise project because of its promise of affordable housing, I am very disappointed that it does not include environmental protections for dark sky or bird-safe building design.

Studies have shown millions of birds die each year from colliding with glass. Millions more are harmed because their night migration is disrupted by city lights. Cupertino is located on the Pacific Flyway. Birds like the yellow-crowned sparrow migrate 3,000 miles to spend the winter here.

The Rise will introduce glass and lighting in very tall buildings. Due to state law, The Rise is not required to comply with Cupertino’s Bird Safety and Dark Sky ordinance.

However, The Rise can voluntarily avoid elements that are hazardous to birds or incorporate protective measures if such elements are included in the plan. The Rise should do exactly that.
— Connie Cunningham Cupertino
From: Hsing-Yen Lin
To: Melissa Robertson
Subject: Re: Disagree to reduce Bollinger Rd from 4 lanes to 2 lanes Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 6:28:50 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Melissa,
Would you please exclude my email from the the written communications for the March 19 City Council? Thanks.

Grace Lin
On Tuesday, March 19, 2024 at 04:31:57 PM PDT, Hsing-Yen Lin <[email protected]> wrote:

Melissa,
Thanks so much for your reply.

Is it true that Cupertino City will discuss about the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design for reducing Bollinger Rd from 4 lanes to 2 lanes?
Thanks.

Grace Lin
On Tuesday, March 19, 2024 at 03:41:04 PM PDT, Melissa Robertson <[email protected]> wrote:

Good afternoon (Council Bcc’d),

Your comments have been received and will be included with the written communications for the March 19 City Council meeting, item 1 study session.

Thank you,

Melissa Robertson
Administrative Assistant
City Manager's Office
[email protected]
(408)777-3148

From: Hsing-Yen Lin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:35 PM
To: City Council <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Disagree to reduce Bollinger Rd from 4 lanes to 2 lanes

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern:

I can’t believe that you are considering reducing Bollinger Rd from 4 lanes to 2 lanes. Bollinger Rd is a very busy street connecting De Anza Blvd. and Lawrence ExpressWay. It’s always busy almost all day long. Residents in West San Jose and Cupertino rely on Bollinger Rd to commute and drive/pick up kids at schools such as Lynbrook High, Cupertino High, Miller Middle High, Hyde Middle High, Dilworth Elementary School ,Portal Elementary School, and several private pre-schools.

Have you seen the heavy traffic on Bollinger Rd. while parents drive kids to school in the morning and pick them up after school in the afternoon, especially in the section in front Hyde Middle School. The lane in front of Hyde Middle School is always blocked because both the only car entrance and exit for Hyde Middle School are on Bollinger Rd. If you reduce Bollinger Rd to only one lane in each direction, cars will have no way to come out of Hyde Middle School and the rest of cars can not enter the school. The traffic will be assured to be jammed during those hours.

Please Delay the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design, not only because of our strong concerns about the predictable traffic jams, but also because of the Financial inefficiency of Cupertino City. Bollinger Rd. has an existing bike lane, so Cupertino City has no need to waste additional funds on extending the bike lanes and reducing the car lanes currently.

Please put my comments into the public record. Your reconsideration will be truly appreciated.

Grace Lin
Resident of West San Jose
Phone # 408-725-0169

From: S B
To: City Council; City Clerk
Subject: Bike lane on Bollinger
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 6:26:08 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
[CC: City clerk]
Dear Mayor Sheila and honorable council members,
I implore you to please REJECT and DO NOT APPROVE the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. (Agenda item 1 on 03/19/24 city council meeting). Please also DO NOT approve any other bike lane spend at this time such as DeAnza, McClellan, Steven’s Creek Blvd.

There are 70k+ residents in Cupertino and vast majority of them use autos to get around. Please do NOT disrupt this critical East-west corridor connecting DeAnza to Lawrence and beyond and vice versa. Please do NOT approve the study to explore elimination of one lane each direction. Please REJECT agenda item 1.

At this time of budget deficit I beseech you to kindly prioritize any and all spend to maximize the number of residents benefitted. How many bicyclists do you have compared to residents using autos. How many residents drive on Bollinger compared to bicyclists. Why do you need to eliminate lanes when you can encourage and identify alternate roads with less traffic for sections of bike lane connectivity.

An inordinate amount of city funds have been spent on bike lane projects. You would think public works capital projects are largely only bike lane projects. This project has never come before city council before for agenda item discussion and public input at council. The very first time it is on agenda it seeks funding approval for the study.

This project is even marked low priority by public works. Why does this make the cut if low priority. Please REJECT this agenda item 1.

I understand that part of the funding is intended to be covered via grant money. I ask that you kindly REJECT this and do not proceed with the Bollinger Rd project. We do not want the grant money going towards causing massive inconvenience to residents. Please apply available grants for pedestrian safety instead such as beacon activated pedestrian crossings, new pedestrian crossings.

You can be sure that my family voters will be aware of this issue on November elections and will be carefully watching how November election candidate Hung Wei will vote on this issue as well as Kitty Moore assuming they are seeking public office for their roles again. We will vote on this issue as well as other issues that demonstrate council members alignment with common sense and average residents needs or their leaning towards small and niche groups that may have valid needs but simply is not pragmatic in such cases to disrupt roads like Bollinger.

While on the topic I also urge you to cancel the remaining spend on Steven’s Creek, DeAnza, McClellan Rd bike lane spend. Enough has been spent on bike lanes. It’s time to spend on the rest of us residents.

Thank you for keeping the average resident in mind and the maximum impact of every dollar spent including grant fund dollars.

Hoping to see you vote to NOT APPROVE agenda item 1 or any bike lane project today at the council meeting.

Sent from my iPhone
From: Kai Wiedman
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 6:01:24 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honored Mayor Mohan, Councilmembers and City Manager Wu, I ask you to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work.

Our budget can go farther and still meet our goals of improved safety for our residents. Please let this remain on the CIP list for this coming year.

Thank you considering my input, and for your work on behalf of Cupertino.

Kai Wiedman
From: Tony Weifeng Zheng
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Please don"t narrow down Bollinger Road!
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 5:59:20 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Cupertino City Council,
As a West SJ resident, I use Bollinger Road every day to commute and do shopping at nearby Home Depot, Walgreens and Safeway.

It will be a disaster if you reduce the car lanes on Bollinger. This road has no median lane for the left turn onto Alderbrook Lane or Lance Lane so we do need two car lanes for other cars to pass around those left turn cars.

Traffic is not light during day time. VTA Route 25 makes frequent stops on this road. It has a bike lane already but t
here are very few people riding bicycles on Bollinger Road as I have watched each day.

Please leave Bollinger alone for residents' convenience and use your money on other more meaningful projects.

Thanks,
Tony
From: Ava
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 5:31:20 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honored Mayor Mohan, Councilmembers and City Manager Wu, I ask you to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work.

Our budget can go farther and still meet our goals of improved safety for our residents. Please let this remain on the CIP list for this coming year.

Thank you considering my input, and for your work on behalf of Cupertino.

Please include this as part of road safety
Ava Chiao (resident)
From: John McG
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; John McG
Subject: STUPID Bollinger ROAD DIET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 5:25:17 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I just saw this notice to email City Council and City Clerk.... with 7 1/2 notice before a 4 pm deadline. WHAT KIND OF KANGAROO COURT ARE YOU RUNNING!!!!! I'm sure the next notice I will see is there was Overwhelming Support for removing traffic lanes on Bollinger!!!
What a great plan where there are movements to increase housing/low-cost housing. ARE

ALL THE NEW PEOPLE GOING TO RIDE THEIR BIKES TO WORK, AND TO BUY GROCERIES???????
HOW B-L-A-T-A-N-T-L-Y S-T-U-P-I-D !!!!
John McGuigan
From: alysa sakkas
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 5:24:16 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honored Mayor Mohan, Councilmembers and City Manager Wu, I ask you to support the Bollinger Road traffic study.

This CIP item is about safety.

Safety first!
My husband and I have raised two children now 29 and 26 years old who attended Lincoln Elementary school.

Bollinger Road was our travel path to bike to school. After a near-miss accident I decided it was no longer safe for them to ride their bikes to school. We lived far enough away that walking was not practical (~40+ min walk) and so I drive them to and from school every day.

The recent separated bike paths have been a great improvement that I wish would have been there when my children were of the age to be able to ride their bikes to school. I urge you not to stop efforts to continue making Bollinger Road safe for bicyclists, especially students who could be riding their bikes to school every day versus needing to be driven in cars.

Thank you considering my input, and for your work on behalf of Cupertino.

Alysa Sakkas
Cupertino resident since 1991
7400 Tiptoe Lane
From: tejesh mistry
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 5:16:59 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honored Mayor Mohan, Councilmembers and City Manager Wu, I ask you to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work. I live near Jollyman Park and use Bollinger Road on a daily basis. The road already feels unsafe for drivers, and even more so anyone walking or riding a bike.

Our budget can go farther and still meet our goals of improved safety for our residents. Please let this remain on the CIP list for this coming year.

Thank you considering my input, and for your work on behalf of Cupertino. I am writing to you as a private citizen and resident of Cupertino.
-Tejesh Mistry
From: PETER CHUNG
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 5:14:21 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honored Mayor Mohan, Councilmembers and City Manager Wu, I ask you to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work.

Our budget can go farther and still meet our goals of improved safety for our residents. Please let this remain on the CIP list for this coming year.

Thank you considering my input, and for your work on behalf of Cupertino.

From: Judith Wilson
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Keep the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP and moving forward Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 5:13:16 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honored Mayor Mohan, Councilmembers and City Manager Wu, When I was on the committee to study our school boundaries, this road was noted as particularly busy and dangerous to pedestrians.. This analysis and design will positively impact the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High.

I ask you to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work.

Our budget can go farther and still meet our goals of improved safety for our residents. Please let this remain on the CIP list for this coming year.

Thank you considering my input, and for your work on behalf of Cupertino.

Judy Wilson
30+ year resident of Cupertino
From: Aili Tan
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: PLEASE DO NOT Turn Bollinger a single lane!!
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 5:11:38 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Sir/Madam,

We have been living in Cupertino for more than 20 years, I would like to urge that please do not turn Bollinger into a single lane.

Please be wise that not many people bike on that road, traffic is already heavy on that road. It would be a traffic disaster if you turn Bollinger a single lane.

We voted you to become city council is to trust you to do good things for us, not making our life more difficult in this city.

Thank you!

Aili Tan

From: Debra Nascimento
To: Melissa Robertson
Subject: Fwd: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:40:23 PM
Debra Nascimento
Executive Assistant
City Manager's Office
[email protected]
(408) 777-1302
From: Aditya Vishwakarma <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:12:04 PM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Cc: Cupertino City Manager's Office <[email protected]> Subject: Support the Bollinger Road Study and design in CIP

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen, and Councilmembers, As a former resident of Cupertino who directly lived near the Bollinger/Miller intersection for a decade, I urge you today to support the Bollinger Road traffic study and design work.

There have been many safety issues on Bollinger, including two deaths and many near-misses. It is a small amount to spend on an important topic which impacts the safety of all our residents, many of whom are children going to school at Hyde Middle, Cupertino High, and Lynbrook High. Getting out onto Bollinger for residents living nearby is was always difficult.

This is a great way to make our budget go farther and still meet our goals. I encourage you to let this remain on the CIP list.

Thank you for your work on behalf of Cupertino. And keeping the future of Cupertino safe.

Best Regards,
Aditya Vishwakarma
From: Hsing-Yen Lin
To: Melissa Robertson
Subject: Re: Disagree to reduce Bollinger Rd from 4 lanes to 2 lanes Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:32:05 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Melissa,
Thanks so much for your reply.

Is it true that Cupertino City will discuss about the funds allocation to the Bollinger Road Corridor Design for reducing Bollinger Rd from 4 lanes to 2 lanes?
Thanks.

Grace Lin
On Tuesday, March 19, 2024 at 03:41:04 PM PDT, Melissa Robertson <[email protected]> wrote:

Good afternoon (Council Bcc’d),

Your comments have been received and will be included with the written communications for the March 19 City Council meeting, item 1 study session.

Thank you,

Melissa Robertson
Administrative Assistant
City Manager's Office
[email protected]
(408)777-3148

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern:

Please put my comments into the public record. Your reconsideration will be truly appreciated.

Grace Lin
Resident of West San Jose
Phone # 408-725-0169

From: SWAN
To: City Clerk
Subject: Oppose to Bolinger lane number change
Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 9:41:07 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi, Cupertino staff
My wife and I live near Bolinger and drive daily on this road. The street traffic has been already very bad. Now you want to reduce the number of lanes there, which is insane.

Qing Zhang
From: Betty Li
To: City Council; City Clerk
Subject: Bollinger Road Corridor Design Proposals - Alternative B Please Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 2:03:08 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi,
Please keep the existing 4 lanes on Bollinger road. There is already a backup of traffic on both directions during peak hours, reducing the lanes to 1 on each direction will increase the traffic more on Bollinger from DeAnza to Lawrence.

Thanks,
Betty
From: Yun Lin
To: City Council
Subject: Serious Concerns Regarding Proposed Bollinger Road Lane Reduction Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 11:23:54 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Cupertino City Council,
I am writing as a concerned resident living within 1 mile of Bollinger Road to express my strong objections to the recent proposal for lane reduction from four to two. While I understand that some cycling groups support this change, I believe it's crucial to carefully consider the potential negative consequences for our entire community.

My primary concerns are as follows:

Severe Traffic Congestion: Bollinger Road already experiences significant traffic volume during peak hours. Reducing the number of lanes would likely lead to severe congestion, impacting travel times for residents, commuters, and emergency response vehicles alike.

Compromised Safety: Congestion is directly linked to increased driver frustration, potentially leading to reckless driving behaviors. This poses a heightened safety risk for everyone using Bollinger Road, especially vulnerable pedestrians and cyclists, including the many students in the area. It's also unclear whether the proposed cycle lanes can be adequately separated to ensure cyclist safety.

Economic Impact: Increased traffic could deter people from visiting local businesses along Bollinger Road, potentially harming our local economy.

Insufficient Alternatives: Before implementing such a substantial change, it's essential to fully explore alternative traffic management and cycling safety solutions. These might include improved traffic light synchronization, dedicated bike paths separate from the main road, or other options.

I urge the City Council to reconsider this proposal and prioritize the safety and well- being of all road users. I, along with many other residents, would welcome a collaborative discussion to find solutions that benefit our community without creating significant new problems.

Thank you for your time and serious consideration of this crucial matter.

CC 03-19-2024
Item #4
Revisions to City
Council Procedures
Manual
Written
Communications
From: Kirsten Squarcia
To: City Clerk
Subject: FW: ITEM 4 - CC Procedure Manual - Peggys Slide Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:21:51 PM
Attachments: image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
image007.png
image008.png
ITEM 4 - CC Procedures Manual Peggys slide.pdf
Written communication for Item 4.

Kirsten Squarcia
City Clerk
City Manager's Office
[email protected]
(408) 777-3225

From: Peggy Griffin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:06 PM
To: Kirsten Squarcia <[email protected]>
Subject: ITEM 4 - CC Procedure Manual - Peggys Slide

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Kirsten,

I plan to speak on Item 4. Could you please show this slide when I speak on this item.

Thank you!

Peggy
ITEM6 – CC Procedure Manual
A CC member may…

CC 03-19-2024
Item #7
2023 General Plan
and Housing
Element Annual
Progress Report
Written
Communications
From: Long Jiao
To: City Clerk; City Council
Subject: Cupertino Voice Survey Results regarding Housing Element Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:36:11 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council,
Please include this email for the Council Meeting on 3/19/2024 regarding agenda item #7.

Cupertino Voice is a group of Cupertino residents who care passionately about our community and the welfare of our city. We performed many surveys related to Cupertino issues. Please see https://cupertinovoice.org/?page_id=13 for a full list.

In March 2024, we performed a survey about the Housing Element. The survey was sent to about 15,000 registered Cupertino voters and people who subscribed to our surveys. The survey is still open up to 3/19/2024. We received 168 total responses, including 141 responses from registered Cupertino voters.

The tentative conclusions for this survey are as follows:

1. Survey participants don't like the State taking over the housing control from cities.

2. Survey participants don't like the State mandating housing allocations to cities.

3. Survey participants would like the city to have more public meetings on the Housing Element.

4. Survey participants would like the city to provide public meetings to obtain public input.

5. Survey participants don't support corner lots in single family house neighborhoods to become multi-family housing.

6. Survey participants don't support counting sidewalks and tails through new development projects as "parkland".

7. Survey participants don't support allowing high density housing on all school sites.

Please see https://cupertinovoice.org/?p=155
for detailed results.

Sincerely,
Long Jiao on behalf of Cupertino Voice
CC 03-19-2024
Item #8
Review city-owned
properties
Written
Communications
From: Kitty Moore
To: City Clerk; Kirsten Squarcia; Lauren Sapudar
Subject: CC Item 8 Written Communications March 19, 2024 Date: Monday, March 18, 2024 11:08:40 PM
Attachments: 99-058a Stocklmeir Property - 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. - Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. - Phase I Envornmental Site Assessment.pdf
Dear City Clerk,

Please include the attached file I located in the city records, for item 8 because it has some useful information on the Stocklmeier House. I reduced the file size some, but it is still around 10 MB, if anyone can reduce it further without making it illegible, that would be helpful.

Thank you,

Kitty Moore
Kitty Moore
Councilmember
City Council
[email protected]
(408) 777-1389

CDMCatnp Dresser & McKee Inc.
consulting
engineering
construction
operations
One Walnut Creek Center
100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Tel: 925 933- 2900 Fax: 925 933- 4174
May 13, 1999
Bert Viskovich
Director, Public Works Department
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014- 3255
Subject: Transmittal of PhaseI Environmental Site Assessment 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA
Dear Mr. Viskovich:

Enclosed please find two copies of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment ( ESA) performedfor theproperty at22120StevensCreekBoulevardin Cupertino, California subject property). This Phase I ESA assessesthe subject property for recognized environmental conditions resulting from current or past uses of the subject property or activities at surrounding properties.

If you have any questions or comments, pleasecall us at 925-933-2900.

Very Truly Yours,
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
e 2v: XL'
Randall T Smith,, P. E.

Project Director
encl.

Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment
22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Cupertino, California
May 12, 1999
CDM Project No. 10886- 25977
Prepared by:

Andria Pornponi
QROFESSIONq
F2Reviewed by:
2 22C
Rlo. C- 51180
EXP. tri a
Randall 0mith, P. E. \
T
r
CIVk\-
OF CP-\-
Contents
Section 1 Executive Summary .............................................. 1- 1 Section 2 Introduction.................................................... 2- 1

2. 1 Purpose ................................................. 2- 1

2. 2 Description of Work ........................................ 2- 1

2. 3 Limiting Conditions and Methodolgy Used ...................... 2- 2 Section 3 Property Description ............................................. 3- 1

3. 1 Location and Legal Description ............................... 3- 1

3. 2 Property and Vicinity Characteristics ........................... 3- 1

3. 3 Description of Structures and Other Improvements ............... 3- 1

3. 4 Current Uses of Property .................................... 3- 2

3. 5 Past Uses of Property ...................................... 3- 2

3. 6 Current and Past Uses of Adjoining Property .................... 3- 3 Section 4 Records Review ................................................. 4- 1

4. 1 Databases Searched ....................................... 4- 1

4. 2 Database Search Results ................................... 4- 2

4. 3 Physical Setting ........................................... 4- 8 Section 5 Site Reconnaissance and Interviews ................................. 5- 1

5. 1 Hazardous Substances ..................................... 5- 1

5. 2 Solid Waste/ Non- Hazardous Waste ........................... 5- 1

5. 3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls ................................... 5- 1

5. 4 Asbestos - Containing Materials ............................... 5- 2

5. 5 Air Quality ................................................ 5- 2

5. 6 Storage Tanks ............................................ 5- 2

5. 7 Water, Wastewater, and Storm Water .......................... 5- 2

5. 8 Herbicide and Pesticide Use ................................. 5- 3

5. 9 Lead - Based Paint ......................................... 5- 3 Section 6 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................. 6- 1 Section 7 References, Contacts, and List of Acronyms Used ...................... 7- 1 Appendix A Site Photographs
Appendix B Information Reviewed
Appendix C ED Report
Appendix D Environmental Agency Information Requested and Obtained CDM Camp Dresser & McKee
JACU PERTI MPHASE- NTOC. W PD
Figure
Contents
continued)
List of Figures
Follows Page
3- 1 Topographical Relief Map of Cupertino, California ........................... 3- 1 3- 2 Subject Property Site Plan .............................................. 3- 1 4- 1 EDR Overview Map ................................................... 4- 1 Table
List of Tables
Follows Page
4- 1 EDR Site Inventory .................................................... 4- 1 CDM Camp Dresser & McKee
JACUPERTI N\ PHASE- 1\TOC. W PD
Section 1
Executive Summary
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) was contracted by the City of Cupertino Public Works Department to perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment ( ESA) of the property located at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California ( referred to as the subject property).

Thesubjectproperty is ownedjointly by relativesMr. Alan Stocklmeir, Ms. JanetTrankle, Ms. Pam Stocklmeir, and Mr. Kurt Stocklmeir. The subjectproperty hasbeen owned by the Stocklmeir family sincetheearly1900s. Theapproximately five -acresubjectproperty currentlycontainstwo rental residential units and a noncommercial orchard.

This PhaseI ESAwas performed in general accordancewith American Society for Testing and Materials ( ASTM) standard designation E1527- 97 with the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions' at the subjectproperty. The results of the PhaseI ESA were basedupon information provided to CDM by Mr. Alan Stocklmeir (the most knowledgeable of the owners), review of pertinent historical documents, and observations specific to environmental conditions madeby CDM during a sitewalkthroughof thesubjectproperty conductedonApril 22, 1999.

The subject property was assessedfor recognized environmental conditions with respect to hazardous substances, solid waste/ non- hazardous waste, polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos - containingmaterials, airquality, storagetanks, water, wastewater, stormwater, herbicideand pesticide use, and lead- based paint.

Duringthesitewalkthrough, thesubjectpropertyappearedtobewellmaintained. BasedonCDM's site walkthrough, interviews, and review of site-specific information, there were no indications that prior or current use of the subject property has resulted in recognized environmental conditions.

No evidence was discovered that would indicate that adjacent properties caused recognized environmental conditions at the subject property.

However, due to the age of the structures at the subject property it is likely asbestos -containing material (ACM) and lead-basedpaints were used during construction and any renovations. The existence of friable and/ or non -friable ACM is possible in the wallboard, roofing, flooring, and chimneymaterials. Duringthesitewalkthrough, CDMmadecursoryvisualobservationsforACM and observed no material suspectedof containing friable ACM. Prior to any renovation or demolition of the buildings at the subject property, CDM recommends a certified asbestos As used in ASTM E1527-97, "recognized environmental condition' meansthe following:

Thepresenceor likely presenceofanyhazardoussubstancesor petroleumproductsonapropertyunderconditionsthat indicatedanexistingrelease, apastrelease, oramaterialthreatof areleaseofanyhazardoussubstancesor petroleum productsinto structuresonthepropertyor into theground, groundwater, or surfacewaterof theproperty. Theterm includes hazardous substancesor petroleum products evenunder conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subjectof an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies" ( ASTM, 1997).

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1- 1
JACUPERT[ N\ PHASE- I\ SEC1. WPD
Cupertino Public Works Department Section 1
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Executive Summary consultant conduct an asbestossurvey of the buildings.

During the site walkthrough, flaking paint and paint chips were observed on the window sills of the shop building and one pump house. Basedon the extent of flaking paint, the potential for soil in contact with paint ships to have elevated levels of lead from the lead- based paint is minimal.

In addition, the subject property served as a commercial orchard until the late 1960s. It is possible, although no evidence was fo-und during this PhaseI ESA, that the potential mismanagement (i.e., spill during mixing or dilution and over application) of pesticidesfrom usesassociatedwith the orchard may have adversely impacted the subjectproperty. The potential for residual pesticides in the soil to adversely affect human health is minimal. The orchard maintenance that occurs at the subject property could reduce the residual pesticides in the soil. In general, high concentrations of certain pesticide compounds in soil canclassify soil ashazardous waste. Prior to any major disturbance of the soil at the subjectproperty, CDM recommends collecting soil samplesto determine the extent of impact, if any.

Finally, one abandoned well exists at the eastern pump house in the southwest section of the subject property. If the well will no longer be used, CDM recommends properly destroying the well with the approval of the Santa Clara Valley Water District.

This Executive Summary is not intended to be read as a stand alone document. The reader should review the detailed information regarding eachitem in the following sections: Section3, Property Description; Section 4, Records Review; and Section 5, Site Reconnaissance and Interviews.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1- 2

JACUPERTIMPHASE- RSEM M
Section 2
Introduction
This section describes the purpose of the study and presents the scope of work as well as limitations to the investigation.

2. 1 Purpose
CDM was contracted by the City of Cupertino Public Works Department to perform a PhaseI ESA of the subjectproperty located at 22120StevensCreek Boulevard in Cupertino, California, for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions.

2. 2 Description of Work
CDM received written authorization to proceed on April 13, 1999 from Mr. Bert Viskovich of the City of CupertinoPublicWorksDepartment. Upon authorizationto proceed, CDM arrangedasite walkthrough of the subjectproperty through Mr. Alan Stocklmeir, one of the owners of the subject property.

On April 22, 1999, CDM met with Mr. Stocklmeir at the subject property to discuss background information pertinent to the assessmentof the subjectproperty. After the meeting, CDM conducted a site walkthrough of the subjectproperty, which consistsof six buildings and an orchard of approximately170orange, walnut, andapricottrees. Mr. StocklmeiraccompaniedCDMduringthe site walkthrough and provided information regarding the current and historical usesof the subject property.

Observationsmadeby CDM werenotedandphotographsof thesubjectpropertyweretaken duringthesitewalkthrough. Selectphotographsofthesubjectpropertyareprovidedin Appendix A. Appendix B contains information reviewed pertinent to the subject property.

In addition, a searchof federal, state, and local environmental databaseswas conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. ( EDR). The database search report provides information regardinganypastorcurrenthazardouswastedisposalsites; reportedpetroleumorhazardous waste releases; listed hazardous waste generation, transportation, storage, or disposal facilities; listed solid wastedisposalfacilities; reportleakingundergroundstoragetanks; or listed underground storage tanks at the subjectproperty and properties in the vicinity of the subject property. A copyoftheEDRdatabasereportisprovidedin AppendixC. Cursoryobservations weremadeof surroundingpropertieslistedin theEDRdatabaseduringandrive-throughsurveyof the area.

DuringApril 20throughMay5, 1999, variousfederal, state, andlocalenvironmentalregulatory agencieswere contacted aspart of an investigation of the history of the subject property and to determine whether prior use of the subject property has resulted in recognized environmental conditions. Agency personnel were also questioned about the existenceof recognized CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 2- 1
JACUPERTIN\ PHASE- 1\SEC2. W PD
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Section 2
Introduction
environmental conditions in the vicinity of the subjectproperty. Names and affiliations of persons contacted for information for this Phase I ESA and a list of information reviewed are provided in Section7. Copiesof informationrequestletterssentto environmentalregulatoryagenciesand subsequent responses are provided in Appendix D.

2. 3 Limiting Conditions and Methodology Used
The results of this PhaseI ESAare basedon interviews with environmental regulatory agency and subject property personnel, a walkthrough of the subject property, and a review of acquired environmental regulatory agencydocuments and subjectproperty information. The conclusions, therefore, represent CDM' s professional opinion based on these aforementioned sources of information. This report hasbeenprepared for the exclusive useof the City of Cupertino Public Works Department. It is not intended for useby other parties.

If evidence of recognized environmental conditions are discovered based on CDM' s review of information requested but not as yet provided, CDM will notify the City of Cupertino Public Works Department of these newly discovered issues. Therefore, is supplemental information warrants, CDM reserves the right to change conclusions and recommendations stated in this Phase I ESA.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 2- 2
J:\ CUPERT1N\ PHASE- RSEC2. WPD
Section 3
Property Description

3. 1 Location and Legal Description
The subject property is located at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California, in southwest SantaClara County. Figure 3-1, Topographical Relief Map of Cupertino, California, depicts the location of the subject property with respect to geographical features.

The Assessor' s parcel map was obtained from the Santa Clara County Assessor' s Office. The subject property consistsof Assessor's ParcelNumber 357-09-053. The deed for this parcel, dated March 28, 1984, was obtained from the Santa Clara County Recorder' s Office. Appendix B includes a copy of the parcel map and the deed. According to the deed, the legal description of subject property is as follows:

Beginning at the point of intersection of the Southerly line of StevensCreek Road, asit formerly existed 40 feet wide, with the center line of StevensCreek; thence in a general Southerly direction along the center line of StevensCreek ... to a station designated D.S. 5 ... thence leaving the center line of Stevens Creek and running along the Eastery line of Monta Vista Park ... and along the Easterly line of Inspiration Point, Monta Vista ... to a pipe on said Southerly line of StevensCreek Road; thencealong said Southerly line of StevensCreek Road ... to the point of beginning, containing 4.857acresof land, more or less, and being a portion of the San Antonio Rancho, and being shown upon that certain map entitled, " Map of a survey made for Adelheid M. Stocklmeir in the San Antonio Ranch", which Map was filed for records in the office of the Recorder of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, on December 29, 1915, in Book " O" of Maps, page 88.

3. 2 Property and Vicinity Characteristics
The subjectproperty is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of StevensCreek Boulevard and Stevens Creek in Cupertino, California. Stevens Creek borders the subject property on its eastand south sides. Blackberry Farm Park, consisting of a golf courseand picnic facilities, is located on the east side of the creek, south of Stevens Creek Boulevard. Residential housing is situated north and west of the subjectproperty. A wooden fencelines the western boundary of the subjectproperty, exceptfor a shortsectionthatis aclosedwrought iron gate. Thegateleadsto Dean Court, one of the private roadways adjacent to the subject property. Main access to the subject property isprovided onthenorth sideby agraveldrivewayenteringfrom StevensCreek Boulevard.

3. 3 Description of Structures and Other Improvements
Eight structures are located on the subject property: a main residence, studio apartment with an attached garage, a shop building, two open-air garages, and three pump houses. Figure 3-2 presents the layout of the subject property. The main residence, the studio apartment, and the shop CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 3- 1
JACU P ERTI N\ PHASE- I\ S EC3. W PD
AVE
MORTON `- CJASCADELAr.*,,
DRIVE 11 ' a
0 i
OREJ
Grant
utDA LL FS F
7vzv--- -->--- ----
M ont_ r
HELENA
aliiey1. Sch
0 a
EAD 260
perg In
S
R D*.,
V %
H.
0 232 r
rn., itkr"
i
Z Mll
M
1M. rylc oil
nary
e kv,/Ay
Se
L
a
D C-
R l EAF
7 LILJ
nbuostation-
Jk
J, -,,
F
z
i Mw -
4 C IS CREEK
RD

DE ANZA
PER A,
V istaMoli COLLEGE
r C if
Cementceff,
0 CourSd
3 jtD
j
15 3
a" i
Linco
S Y
Ch
JLL
F
0 FT=
A--
VJE
pjjf It . enne.dy
k,
sar
a
2'
4Gravel Pit'
ater. 019
Gravel
77 pit ------
0i - j
1= R
ANE
north
Grave,) Pi
F 7'
I— BUBrz li 1 0 2000=
1::
ftte-.
545 as/
t Feet
SP, Y
311
P F P rr) i - ATI OA --
Source: U. S. G. S. 15' Quadrangle - Cupertino, CA 1980 Figure 3- 1
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Topographic Relief Map of Cupertino, California xa JaSd
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee
j
MInResidemuse ,--"
SepticTankGaragelQOpen - Air
l01,
and
Studio
Garages \: S
Shop Property Line
sidences l '
I I
Orchard
1 Area
l I I
rCf i i
Property Line
I' I
Residences
Pump
i Houses
El
EI
j //
Figure 3- 2
Subject Property Site Plan
22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Cupertino, California
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase / Environmental Site Assessment
Section 3
Site Description and History
building are each one- story wooden buildings with concrete foundations ( Photographs 1 through 3). The open- air garages have wooden frames with corrugated heavy plastic roofs. The main residence and studio apartment were built in approximately 1900, and the shop building, garages, and pump houseswere built around 1950.

The pump at the pump house located at the northern end of the property was installed around 1920 Photograph 4). It provides water from Stevens Creek for the garden area near the main residence.

Historically, it pumped water for usein irrigating the orchard on the subject property. The pump system consists of a PVC pipe that enters the creek, a pressure tank to hold the creek water, the pump, and garden hoses used for distribution.

The western pump house at the southern end of the property pumped creek water for irrigating the orchard ( Photograph 5). The pump system consisted of a trap door in the creek bed, a concrete holding pit, andthepump. Theholding pit is locatedin theconcretestructurebetweenthewestern and eastern pump houses. This concrete structure, covered with wooden planks, is separated into two comparments: one for the creek water and one for the groundwater well. According to Mr.

Stocklmeir, the creek water pump was installed in the 1920sor 1930s. The 8 -foot by 10 -foot pump house is now used for storage space. The pump is operable but has not been used in approximately twenty years.

The easternpump house at the southern end of the subjectproperty housesa pump and equipment for a drinking water well ( Photograph 6). The groundwater well is located in the concrete structure between the two pump houses. The well was installed between 1900to 1905. Mr. Stocklmeir is unaware of the depth of the well; however, Mr. Stocklmeir stated that distribution pipes at least 120 feetlong havebeenpulled out of thewell. Thewell wasusedasthemain drinking water sourcefor the subject property until the property was connectedto the City' s water lines. The well system consists of pipes inserted to reach the groundwater, the pump, and a concrete pressure tank. The pump is inoperableandhasnotbeenusedin over50years. The8 -footby 10 -foot pump houseis now used for storage space.

3. 4 Current Uses of Property
Since 1996, Mr. Stocklmeir has rented out the main residence and the studio apartment. The orchard, consistingof approximately150orangetreesand20walnut andapricottrees, fills the majority of the subjectpropertynot occupiedby themainresidence, pump houses, andother structures ( Photographs 7 and 8). The orchard no longer functions as a commercial operation. The oranges arepicked every March by volunteers from the SecondHarvest Food Bank of SantaClara and San Mateo Counties in San Jose, California. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, the extent of current orchard maintenance is discing the orchard surface two to three times a year.

3. 5 Past Uses of Property
Accordingto Mr. Stocklmeir, thesubjectpropertyhasbeenownedby theStocklmeirfamily since the turn of the century. Mr. Stocklmeir' s great grandmother lived at the main residencefrom 1900 until the mid - 1940s. His grandparents then lived at subject property from 1949 to 1996, at which time the main residence and studio apartment were rented out.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 3- 2

JACUPERTIMPHASE- RSEM M
Cupertino Public Works Department Section 3
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Site Description and History Until the late 1960s, the subject property ran a commercial orchard. The orchard area was primarily walnut trees and customers would come to the property to pick the nuts. A portion of the orchard was leased out for growing flowers. The orchard became economically unfeasible and the commercial business ended in the late 1960s. In the mid- 1970s, the majority of the walnut trees were removed and replaced with orange trees. About twenty walnut and apricot trees remain at the northern end of the orchard.

3. 6 Current and Past Uses of Adjoining Property
The Stocklmeir family owned the land adjacent to the west side of the subject property before the area was developed into residences. That area grew additional walnut trees and was also leased out for flower growing. The Stocklmeir family sold that land in 1976.

Aerial photographs, available from Pacific Aerial Surveys, were reviewed. The photographs were from the years 1960, 1968, 1978, and 1988. Appendix B presents copies of these aerial photographs.

In the 1960 photograph, the surrounding area was used for agricultural and residential purposes.

Orchards occupied the subject property, the adjacent property to the west, and portions of the area east of the subject property which is currently Blackberry Farm Park. The main residence is visible through the vegetation on the subject property.

In the 1968photograph, more of the surrounding areahasbeenconverted to residential uses.

Orchards occupy the subjectproperty and the adjacentproperty to the west. The areaeastof the subject property has been developed into a golf course.

In the 1978photograph, the majority of the surrounding areais residential property. On the subject property, the main residence, shop, garages, and pump hosesare visible. The studio apartment is not visible due to vegetation at the subject property. The northern portion of the orchard area appears to be heavily planted, but the southern half is either open spaceor lightly planted. Housing has been developed along Scenic Boulevard, adjacent to the subject property to the west.

In the 1988 photograph, a few small agricultural areas still exist north and east of the subject property. The surrounding areais residential. At the subjectproperty, all of the current structures are visible. The northern portion of the orchard is planted with large trees, while the southern portion has smaller trees.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 3- 3
JACUPERTIMPHASE- ASEC3. WPD
Section 4
Records Review
A searchof environmentalregulatoryagencydatabaseswasconductedby EDRfor thesubject property and properties in the vicinity of the subjectproperty. The EDR databasesearchwas conducted to determine whether documentation exists related to environmental incidents at the subject property or at properties in its vicinity. Table 4-1 presents a summary that lists the database, search distance and number of sites recorded on the database searched. Figure 4-1 presents the locationof siteslocatedby thedatabasesearchin thevicinity of subjectproperty. Appendix C presents the results of the EDR database search.

4. 1 Databases Searched
Thefollowing databasesandradii searchdistancesweresearchedfor thesubjectproperty:

Federal Databases
National Priorities List ( NPL) and Records of Decision ( ROD) - 1 mile; NPL Liens - subject property only;
Delisted NPL - subjectproperty only;
ResourceConservation and RecoveryAct (RCRA) permitted Treatment, Storageand Disposal ( RCRIS- TSD) facilities - 0. 5 mile;
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System ( RAATS) - subject property only; Corrective Actions ( CORRACTS) - 1 mile;
RCRA Registered small or large generators of hazardous waste ( RCRIS Small Quantity/ Large Quantity) - 0. 25 mile;
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information CERCLIS) - 0. 5 mile;
Superfund Consent Decrees ( CONSENT) - 1 mile;
CERCLIS - No Further Response Action Planned Facilities ( CERC- NFRAP) - subject property only;
Polychlorinated Biphenyl ( PCB) Activity Database System ( PADS) - subject property only; Emergency Response Notification System ( ERNS) - subject property only; Facility Index System ( FINDS) - subject property only; Toxic Release Inventory database ( TRIS) - subject property only; Toxic Substances Control Act ( TSCA) - subject property only; Material Licensing Tracking System ( MLTS) - subject property only; Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System ( HMIRS) - subject property only; State of California, Regional and County Databases
Cal - Sites ( AWP/ CAL- SITES) - 1 mile;
California Bond Expenditure Plan ( CA BEP) - 1 mile;
Proposition 65 ( Notify 65) - 1 mile;
California Hazardous Material Incident Report System ( CHMIRS) - 1 mile; CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 1
JACUPERTIN\ PHASE- 1\SEC4. W PD
Table 4- 1
EDR Site Inventor

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY SHOWING

ALL SITES
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC359034. 1s Page 7
Search
Target Distance Total
Database Property Miles) 1/ 8 1/ 8- 1/ 4 1/ 4- 1/ 2 1/ 2 - 1 1 Plotted NPL 1. 000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Delisted NPL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RCRIS- TSD 0. 500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
AWP 1. 000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Cal - Sites 1. 000 0 0 0 1 NR 1
Notify 65 1. 000 0 0 1 0 NR 1
CHMIRS 1. 000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Cortese 1. 000 0 0 1 1 NR 2
Toxic Pits 1. 000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CERCLIS 0. 500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CERC- NFRAP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CORRACTS 1. 000 0 0 0 1 NR 1
State Landfill 0. 500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST 0. 500 0 3 8 NR NR 11
UST 0. 250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
CA FID 0. 250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
WMUDS/ SWAT 0. 500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
HAZNET 0. 250 0 4 NR NR NR 4
RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. 0. 250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen. 0. 250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
NPL Liens TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CA SLIC 0. 500 0 0 1 NR NR 1
CA Bond Exp. Plan 1. 000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ROD 1. 000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CONSENT 1. 000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CA WDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
South Bay Region 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Coal Gas 1. 000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC359034. 1s Page 7
OVERVIEW MAP - 359034. 1 s - Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.

W./ N a M ES T E W : H 0 M Z%1/ A j R D
9 / ! 25, 0
s
S REEK A VD / 8
t-
M
C,

L L' LAN R
Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
Coal Gasification Sites ( if requested)
National Priority List Sites
I I LandfillSites
0 1/ 4 12 1 Miles
Power transmission lines
Oil & Gas pipelines
Figure 4- 1
100 - year flood zone
500 - year flood zone EDR Overview Map
TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.

ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi 1TY/ STATE/ ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY #: 359034. 1s LAT/ LONG: 37. 3226 / 122. 0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8: 39 am Section 4
Site Reconnaissance and Interviews
State index of properties with hazardous waste ( CORTESE) - 1 mile; Toxic Pits cleanup facilities ( TOXIC PITS) - 1 mile;
CA Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery listing ( CA SLIC) - 0. 5 mile; State Landfill - 0. 5 mile;
Registered Underground Storage Tanks ( UST) - 0. 5 mile; Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks ( AST) - subject property only; Leaking Underground Storage Tanks ( LUST) - 0. 5 mile;
Waste Management Units ( WMUDS/ SWAT) — 0. 5 mile;
Hazardous Waste Information System ( HAZNET) - 0. 25 mile; California Facility Index Database ( CA FID) - 0. 25 mile; California Waste Discharge System ( CA WDS) - subject property only.

South Bay Site Management System ( SOUTH BAY) - subject property only; and In addition, EDR searchedformer manufactured gas (Coal Gas) sitesfor a radius searchof 1 mile.

4. 2 Database Search Results
A summary of listed environmental siteswithin the requestedsearchdistance follows.

National Priorities List ( NPL) Sites
The National Priorities List ( NPL) is a list of the nation' s most serious hazardous waste sites. NPL sitesarethosesiteswhich theUnited StatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency (USEPA), under its Superfund program, has determined to be a significant threat to public health. The Recordsof Decision (ROD) documentmandatesapermanentremedyatanNPLsitecontainingtechnicaland healthinformation to aid thecleanup. TheUSEPAhastheauthority to file liens (NPL Liens) against realestateproperty in orderto recoverremedialactionexpendituresor whentheproperty owner receivesnotification of potential liability.

The database searches indicated no NPL and ROD sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property. Thereareno liensagainstthesubjectpropertyandthesubjectproperty wasnot on nor deleted from the NPL.

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ( RCRA) Sites
The RCRIS databases contain data compiled for RCRA and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984. RCRIS lists sites which treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by RCRA. RCRAadministrationactiontrackingsystem (RAATS) containsrecordsbasedon enforcement action issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil suits. Under RCRA, the CORRACTS database contains hazardous waste haulers which are undergoing corrective action.

The RCRIS database indicates that no TSD sites are located within a 0. 5 -mile radius of the subject property. The subject property is not listed in the RAATS database.

The CORRACTS database search indicated one CORRACTS site within a one -mile radius of the subjectproperty. Zilog Incorporated is located approximately 0.75miles southeastof the subject property. Zilog manufactured silicon, semiconductor wafers, and microprocessors, and was listed asahazardouswastestoragefacility. Zilog operatedthreeUSTs: onefor storageof wastesolvents CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 2
JACUPERTIN\ PHASE- 1\SEC4. W PD
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment
Section 4
Records Review
acetone, isopropanol, freon, trichloroethane, xylene, and n -butyl acetate); one for containment of potential solvent spills; and one for containment of potential sulfuric, nitric, and hydrofluoric acid spills ( J.H. Kleinfelder & Associates, 1983). J.H. Kleinfelder & Associates concluded no soil degradation had occurred from the operation of the acid spill tank, and no additional analytical testingwasnecessaryforthewastesolventstorageandspillcontainmentUSTsdue toonlytrace levels (lessthan 20 micrograms per kilogram) of tetrachloroethane, toulene, and benzene found in soil samples near the other two USTs ( J.H. Kleinfelder & Associates, 1983). According to Zilog, those chemicals were not used in their operations. In 1987, the California Department of Health Services (DHS) determinedthatnocontaminationresultingfromZilog'soperationsremainedatthe site ( DHS, 1987). The Zilog site was officially closedby the DHS in 1988 (DHS, 1988).

Due to the site closure by DHS, tracelevels of contaminants in the soil, and distance from the subject property, it is unlikely that thesitehasimpactedthesubjectproperty.

RCRA Registered Large and Small Generators ( LG GEN, SM GEN) of Hazardous Waste
The EPA's RCRA facility databaselists facilities which report generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Large Generators ( LG GEN) are facilities which generate at least 1,000kilograms of non -acutely hazardous waste per month while Small Generators SM GEN) produce less per month.

No SMGENor LG GENsitesarelocatedwithin a 0.25 -mile radiusof thesubjectproperty.

ComprehensiveEnvironmentalResponse, Compensationand LiabilityAct CERCLA) Sites
The CERCLA Information System ( CERCLIS) supports EPA Headquarters and regions for the management and oversight of the Superfund program. CERCLA sites are either on the NPL or are in screening and assessmentphasefor possible inclusion on the NPL. CONSENT decreesare major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL sites. CERC- NFRAP sites are those CERCLA sites where no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly, or the contamination was not serious enough to require NPL consideration.

No CERCLIS or CONSENT sites are located within a 0. 5 -mile and 1 -mile radius of the subject property, respectively. The subject property was not listed on the CERC- NFRAP database.

PCB Activity Database System ( PADS)
The PADS identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/ or brokers and disposers of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.

The PADS databasesearchindicated that the subjectproperty is not a PADS site.

Emergency Response Notification System ( ERNS)
The ERNS list is a national database used to collect information on reported accidental releases of oil and hazardous substances. Spill reports are made to federal authorities including the EPA, the CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 3
JAC U PERTI N\ PHASE- 1\SEC4. WPD
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment
Section 4
Records Review
US Coast Guard, the National Response Center and the Department of Transportation.

TheERNSdatabasesearchindicatedthatthesubjectpropertyis not anERNSsite.

Facility Index System ( FINDS)
FINDS contains both facility information and referencesto other sourcesthat contain more detail.

TheFINDSdatabasesearchindicatedthat thesubjectpropertyis not aFINDSsite.

Toxic Release Inventory Database (TRIS)
Section313of theEmergencyPlanningandCommunityRight -to -Know Act (alsoknown asSARA Title III) of 1986requirestheEPAto establishaninventoryof toxicchemicalsemissionsfrom certain facilities. Facilitiessubjectto this reportingarerequiredto completeaToxicChemicalReleaseForm Form R) for specified chemicals.

TheTRISdatabasesearchindicatedthatthesubjectpropertyisnot aTRISsite.

Toxic Substances Control Act ( TSCA)
TSCA identifies manufactures and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site.

The TSCA databasesearchindicated that the subjectproperty is not a TSCA site.

Material Licensing Tracking System ( MLTS)
MLTSis maintainedby theNuclearRegulatoryCommissionandcontainsalist of approximately 8,100siteswhich possessor useradioactivematerialsandwhich aresubjectto NRClicensing requirements.

The MLTS databasesearchindicated that the subjectproperty is not a MLTS site.

Hazardous Materials Information Reporting Systems ( HMIRS) The HMIRS database contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to the Department of Transportation.

The HMIRS databasesearchindicated that the subjectproperty is not a HMIRS site.

California Annual Workplan ( AWP)
California Department of Toxic SubstanceControl' sAnnual Workplan, formerly Bond Expenditure Plan (BEP), identifies known hazardous substancesitestargeted for cleanup.

The AWP and BEP database search indicated no AWP or BEP sites within a one - mile radius of the subject property.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 4
JACU PERTI N\ PHASE- 1\SEC4. W PD
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Section 4
Records Review
Calsites ( CAL - SITES)
The CAL -SITESdatabasecontains potential or confirmed hazardous substancereleaseproperties as reported by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control ( DTSC).

The CAL -SITESdatabasesearchindicated one CAL -SITESsite within a one -mile radius of the subjectproperty. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation ( KACC) is located just under one mile west of the subject property. In 1987, KACC decontaminated and closed a paint/ sludge UST.

Oil andgreasewasfound in thesurroundingsoilat concentrationsof 1,100to 2,600milligrams per kilogram ( mg/ kg). A subsequentinvestigationfoundthatsamplesfromunderlyingsoilshad chromium and lead levels consistent with regional background levels, and purgeable and aromatic hydrocarbonslevelsbelow detectionlimits. Onegroundwatersamplefrom thesiteexceededthe Primary Drinking Water Standard for chromium ( Exceltech, Inc., 1988).

In 1988, a kerosenespill occurred at KACC. Excavatedcontaminated soil contained high levels of vegetable oil. Subsequentanalysis of samplesfrom the areaof the releaseindicated vegetable oil in thesoil samplesat concentrationsfrom 19to 24mg/ kg, andin agroundwatersampleat a concentration of 100 micrograms per liter. Total petroleum hydrocarbon ( TPH) as kerosene was foundin soilsamplesrangingin concentrationfrom14to32mg/kg, butwasnotdetectedin groundwater. TPHaskeroseneconcentrationsin soilwerebelowtheactionlevelof 100mg/kg.

No action level exists for vegetable oil in soil or groundwater ( ENSCOEnvironmental Services, 1988).

No documentationfrom theSanFranciscoBayRegionalWaterQuality ControlBoard (RWQCB) or any other environmental agency on action taken at the KACC site existed in the RWQCB files. Mr.

David Barwith theRWQCBstatedtheKACCcaseisinactive, astatuswhich usuallyoccurswhen there is a shortage of staff to investigate the case at its onset. Even though the groundwater flow is theareais to theeast, Mr. Barindicatedthatthesubjectpropertywasunlikely to havebeen impacted by the KACC site due to the distance, just under one mile, between the two sites.

Proposition 65 ( Notify 65)
Notify 65containsfacility notificationsaboutanyreleasewhich couldimpactdrinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk.

The Notify 65 databasesearchindicated one Notify 65site within a one -mile radius of the subject property. Arco ServiceStation #6182is locatedapproximately0.40mileswestof thesubject property. The site was also listed in the LUST Region 2 databaseashaving reported a releasefrom a gasoline UST in 1988. According to the EDR report, the SantaClara Valley Water District SCVWD) signed off on the site on July 29, 1996.

Due to the caseclosure by the SCVWD, it is unlikely that the Notify 65 site hasimpacted the subject property.

California Hazardous Material Information Reporting System (CHMIRS) The CHMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to Department of Transportation.

The CHMIRS database search indicated no CHMIRS sites within a one -mile radius of the subject CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 5
JACU PERTI N\ PHASE- 1\SEC4. W PD
Cupertino Public Works Department Section 4
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment Records Review
property.

State Index of Properties with Hazardous Waste ( Cortese) TheCortesedatabaseidentifiespublic drinking waterwellswith detectablelevelsof contamination, hazardous substancesites selectedfor remedial action, siteswith known toxic material identified throughtheabandonedsiteassessmentprogram, siteswith undergroundstoragetankshavinga reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The source is the California Environmental Protection Agency.

The Cortese database search indicated two Cortese sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property. The Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation is located just under a mile from the subject property. A detailed description of the release and subsequent investigation can be found above in the section on CAL -SITES sites. The other Cortese site is the Measurex Corporation and is further discussed under LUST sites.

Toxic Pits
ToxicPit sitesaresuspectedof containinghazardoussubstanceswherecleanuphasnot yet been completed.

The Toxic Pits database search indicated no Toxic Pit sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property.

California Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup ( CA SLIC) CA SLIC sites are sites that have impacted groundwater or have the potential to impact groundwater. The CA SLIC databaseis provided by the RWQCB.

The CA SLIC database search indicated one CA SLIC site within a 0. 5 -mile radius of the subject property. TheCupertinoPostOfficeis locatedapproximately0.45mileseastof thesubjectproperty.

The EDR report states a release from a waste oil UST occurred at the site. The RWQCB closed the site investigation on August 10, 1993.

Basedon the caseclosure by the RWQCB, it is unlikely that the CA SLIC site has impacted the subject property.

State Landfill
TheSolidWasteFacilities /Landfill SITESsite (SWF/LF) typerecordstypically containaninventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, thesemay be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that fail to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites.

The State Landfill database search indicated no state landfill sites located within a 0. 5 -mile radius of the subject property.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 6
JACU PERTI N\ PHASE- 1\SEC4. WPD
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment
Section 4
Records Review
Underground and Aboveground Storage Tanks ( UST/ AST), Leaking Underground Storage Tanks ( LUST)
TheHazardousSubstanceStorageContainerDatabaseisahistoriclisting of USTandLUSTsites.

The source of the database is from the State Water Resource Control Board ( SWRCB). The database searchlocated no registered UST siteswithin a 0.25 -mile radius. The AST databaselists registered ASTsasreportedbytheSWRCB. TheEDRdatabasereportednoASTsatthesubjectproperty.

TheLUSTdatabasesearchindicated11LUSTsiteswithina 0.5 -mileradiusofthesubjectproperty.

Of the 11 sites listed, " Dennis Hall Property," " Arco # 6182," " U. S. Postal Service," and " Measurez Corporation" areduplicates. Of theremainingsevenLUSTsites, sixsiteinvestigationshavebeen closed (" Facciola Residence," " Dennis Hall Property," " Arco," " US Postal Service," " Higdon, Alley, Kolb" and " Measurex Corporation"). Neither the RWQCB nor the SCVWD has a file for the remaining site, the Mobile Service Station. The RWQCB and the EDR database report that the site was removed from the SCVWD's LUST database. Ms. JeanetteTownsend of the SCVWD, the lead agency for the site, confirmed that that agencyhasno file for the site and if the site was removed from the LUST databasethere was no contamination problem at the site. This concurs with the EDR database which reports the soil contamination occurred at such a low level as to not pose a threat to water quality.

Basedon theinformation from theRWQCBandSCVWD, it isunlikely thattheLUSTsiteshave impacted the subject property.

Waste Management Unit Database ( WMUDS/ SWAT)
WMUDS/SWATis usedby theSWRCBto trackandinventorywastemanagementunits andconsist of 12 separate databases.

The WMUDS/ SWAT database search indicated there are no WMUDS/ SWAT sites within a 0. 5 -mile radius of the subject property.

Hazardous Waste Information System ( HAZNET)
The California Environmental Protection Agency provides a database (HAZNET) from the manifest data extracted from copies of hazardous waste manifests received eachyear by the DTSC.

The HAZNET database search indicated four HAZNET sites within a 0. 25 -mile radius of the subject property. Of the four sites, " Clarks Auto Parts & Machine" is a duplicate. The three remaining sites Dan Facciola", " Lynn Markey", and " Clarks Auto Parts & Machine") do not have files at the California Environmental Protection Agency. The DTSCis currently reviewing their files to determine if information existson the remaining sits. If information doesbecomeavailable that suggestsa HAZNET site hashad the potential to impact the subjectproperty, CDM will notify the Cupertino Public Works Department.

California Facility Inventory Database ( FID)
California Environmental Protection Agency provides the Facility Inventory Database (FID) which contains a historical listing from the SWRCB.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 7
JACUPERTI N\ PHASE- 1\SEC4. W PD
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Section 4
Records Review
TheFIDdatabasesearchindicatednoFIDsiteswithina0.25 -mileradiusofthesubjectproperty.

California Waste Discharge System ( CA WDS)
CAWDSsitesaresiteswhichmayhavebeenissuedwastedischargerequirementsby theSWRCB.

TheCA WDSdatabasesearchindicatedthesubjectpropertyis not aCA WDSsite.

South Bay Site Management System ( SOUTH BAY)
TheSOUTHBAYdatabaselistsgroundwaterpollutioncasesin theSantaClaraValleywherethe regulatory lead is the SanFranciscoBay RWQCB.

TheSOUTHBAY databasesearchindictedthesubjectproperty is not a SOUTHBAY site.

Orphan Sites
Orphansitesaresiteslistedin anyofthedatabasesEDRsearchedandarepotentiallywithin one mile of the subjectproperty, but cannot be accurately mapped.

TheEDRdatabasesearchindicatedeightorphansitespotentiallywithin one -mile of the subject property. Two sites are duplicates either of sites on the orphans list or sites from the other databases (" Arco Stn # 495" and " Kaiser Aluminum"). Based on the partial addresses provided for the orphan sites, CDM concluded five of the sites to be greater than one -mile from the subject property: " Arco Service Station # 495," " Texaco," " Doneervyn' s," and " Rancho Service Center." The remaining site, Hanson PermanenteCement, formerly Kaiser Cement Corporation, is located just under one mile west of the subjectproperty. A number of USTsin five areasat the site have been removed or closed in place. In 1993, Kaiser Cement Corporation removed one 10,000 -gallon diesel UST and two 10,000 -gallon gasoline USTs from the Upper Service Station area. Soil samples revealed only minor levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons. TPH as gasoline was detected at a maximumconcentrationof 22mg/ kg, andTPHasdieselwasnot detectedabovelaboratory reporting limits ( RWQCB, 1995). The RWQCB closed the site investigation of this area in 1995. A copy of the closure letter is included in Appendix D.

According to SCVWD files, four 1,000 -gallon diesel USTs were removed from the Lower Service Station. Floatingproduct wasobservedin thetankpit andexcavatedsoilshada strongdieselodor, but no soil sampleswerecollected. One4,000 -gallondieselUSTwasremovedfrom theEmergency GeneratorArea. During removal, thetankappearedundamagedbut its linesandplumbing showed signs of leakage. Excavated soil had a diesel odor and contained product. No soil samples were obtained from this area. USTs were also removed from the Garage and Oil House areas. At least two of these USTs were closed in place.

According to the SCVWD, no further remedial work is necessaryat the Garageand Oil House areas.

On March 2, 1999, the SCVWD requested Hanson Permanent Cement submit a work plan to define the extent of soil and groundwater contamination at the Lower ServiceStation and the Emergency Generator Area ( SCVWD, 1999). According to Ms. Adele Shepherd with SCVWD, Hanson Permanente Cement submitted a workplan which hasbeenapproved by the SCVWD and is now being implemented.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 8
JACUPERTI N\ PHASE- I\ SEC4. W PD
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment
Section 4
Records Review
Even though the groundwater flow is the area is to the east, due to the distance of the Hanson PermanenteCement site from the subjectproperty (just under one mile), the potential is minimal that the LUST site has impacted the subjectproperty.

4.2 Physical Setting
Theproperty is locatedin thewest -centralportion of theSantaClaraValleywhich is abroad structural trough infilled with alluvial sediments. The subjectproperty is within the corporate boundaries of the City of Cupertino. StevensCreek flows adjacent to the eastand south sidesof the subject property.

Theclimatein theareamaintainsa fairly constanttemperatureduetheeffectsof surrounding bodiesofwater, thePacificOceanandtheSanFranciscoBay. Summersarecoolandoftenfoggy and winters are moderately wet. The subject property experiences the same climatic conditions as much of the SantaClara Valley which is representedby climate data collected in SanJose. Basedon 50 years of climate data, a monthly averageminimum temperature of 41.3 degreesFahrenheit (°F) occursin Januaryandamonthly averagemaximumtemperatureof 82.2 OFoccursin July.

Temperature extremes have been recorded at a low of 19 OFin December 1990 to a high of 108 OFin July 1972. The annual averageprecipitation is 14.61inches (Western Regional Climate Center, 1999).

The subject property is situated in the central part of the CoastRanges, which is characterized by a series of parallel, northwesterly -trending, folded and faulted mountain chains. In this part of the province, flatland topography is underlain by recent alluvium which is typically underlain by non -marine and marine sedimentary rocks. The region has been folded and faulted as a result of major uplift of the area.

The Department of Water Resources ( DWR) identifies the Santa Clara Formation as a principle group of the water -bearing units in the SantaClara Valley groundwater basin (Bulletin No. 118-1, 1975). DWR' s report modeled the entire basin and identified preferential groundwater pathways created by highly permeable coarse-grained channel deposits of the Santa Clara Formation which have been intersected by numerous faults. Another study by DWR (Bulletin No. 66-62, 1964) states that the main source of groundwater in the Santa Clara Valley is the younger alluvium and that the Santa Clara Formation is of secondary importance. In addition, the principal aquifers of the area exhibit pressure characteristics so that the groundwater is both confined and unconfined.

Groundwater flow in the areagenerally follows the topography, which would indicate an easterly flow gradient ( EMCON Associates, 1993). Groundwater in this area of the Santa Clara Valley is generally a bicarbonate type with sodium and calcium the predominant cations. Although moderately to very hard, the waters are of good to excellent quality and suitable for most uses DWR, 1964).

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 4- 9
JACU PEATI N\ PHASE- 1\SEC4. W PD
Section 5
Site Reconnaissance and Interviews
On April 22, 1999, CDM met with Mr. Alan Stocklmeir, one of the four owners of the subject property, at the subject property. Mr. Stocklmeir was interviewed by CDM to obtain information regarding the subject property history, existing conditions, and property - specific information related to current and past operations. The Stocklmeir family hasowned the subject property since the 1900s, and Mr. Stocklmeir is the most knowledgeable of the current family owners about the subject property. The interview was followed by a walkthrough of the subjectproperty.

The subject property was assessed for recognized environmental conditions with respect to hazardous substances, solid waste/ non- hazardous waste, polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos - containing materials, air quality, storage tanks, water, wastewater, storm water, herbicides and pesticides, and lead- based paint. CDM did not access the interior of the buildings on the subject property, but observations were made through the windows.

5. 1 Hazardous Substances
No hazardous substances were observed at the subject property. Mr. Stocklmeir is not aware of any spills or releases of hazardous substances on the subject property or surround properties. During the site walkthrough, CDM did not observe any operations that would produce hazardous wastes.

5. 2 Solid Waste/ Non- Hazardous Waste
During the site walkthrough, several piles of solid waste were observed at the subject property.

One small pile of used wooden shingles is present at the southern end of the site. Along the western boundary of the subjectproperty, small piles of building materials such asmetal fencing, lumber, and metal pipes were observed ( Photograph 9). Mr. Stocklmeir indicated the shingles were previously used on one of the pump houses, and the building materials are related to his personal contractor business. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, there are no discarded items on the subject property.

Residential waste generated at the subjectproperty is disposed of through Cupertino' s city-wide trash disposal service.

5. 3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls
According to Mr. Bob Bondy of Pacific Gasand Electric Company (PG&E), there are two piecesof oil -filled electrical equipment on the subjectproperty. A capacitorbank is located at the northeastern corner of the subjectproperty at the corner of the driveway and StevensCreek Boulevard. According to Mr. Bondy, the capacitor is labeled ashaving no PCB -containing fluid.

PG& E also operates a pole - mounted transformer located at the southern corner of the subject property. No sticker is affixed to this transformer. According to Mr. Bondy, PG&E does not test transformers for PCBs if they have not been leaking. Mr. Bondy stated that if the residential units at CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 5- 1
JACUPERTIN\ PHASE- 1\SEC5. W PD
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Section 5
Site Reconnaissance and Interviews
the subject property are demolished, PG& E will remove the transformer.

5. 4 Asbestos - Containing Materials
The main residence, studio, and the other subject property structures were constructed between 1900 and 1950, before the commercial use of asbestos - containing material ( ACM). ACM are usually found in structures built or renovated between the late 1950's and the early 1980's. However, it is likely that during renovations and additions to the building friable and/ or non -friable ACM was used. Theexistenceof friableand/ or non -friableACM is possiblein thewallboard, roofing, flooring, and chimney materials. During the site walkthrough, CDM made cursory visual observations for ACM and observed no material suspectedof containing friable ACM. However, without conducting an asbestos survey, the presence and extent, if any, of ACM at the subject property cannot be determined.

5. 5 Air Quality
The site walkthrough did not reveal any particulate, gas, odor, or emission to the atmosphere from the subject property that would violate any environmental regulation. No violations for the subject property are on file with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.

5. 6 Storage Tanks
According to Mr. Stocklmeir, no USTsare located on the subjectproperty. CDM did not discover any indication that a UST exists or existed at the subject property.

One approximately 400 -gallon AST is located on the dirt on the eastside of the driveway Photograph 10). According to Mr. Stocklmeir, the AST contained propane used to heat the main residence in the 1930s and 1940s. Use of the AST was discontinued in the mid - 1940s or earlier when natural gas became available. To Mr. Stocklmeir' s knowledge, the AST is empty. Mr. Stocklmeir is not aware of a permit for the AST or if the AST has been located at any other spot on the subject property. The AST appeared to be in good condition with some light rust along the upper rim and did not appear to be connected to any piping.

5. 7 Water, Wastewater, and Storm Water
According to Mr. Stocklmeir, a groundwater well was installed at the subject property between 1900 to 1905by his great grandfather. The well is located outside the eastern pump house located at the southern end of the subject property. The main residence was connected to the city water supply in the 1940s or earlier. Mr. Stocklmeir stated the well is abandoned and has not been used in over 50 years. The well has not been destroyed.

A one -compartment septic tank is located on the eastside of the driveway, as shown in Figure 3-2 Photograph 11). The approximately 700 -gallon tank services the main residence and the studio apartment. Only sanitary wastewater is generatedat the subjectproperty. Mr. Stocklmeir is unaware of when the septic tank was installed, but stated it was there when his grandparents lived at the subject property starting in 1949. To Mr. Stocklmeir' s knowledge, no permit exists for the septic tank.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 5- 2
J:\ CUPERT1N\ PHASE- 1\SEC5. WPD
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Section 5
Site Reconnaissance and Interviews
Mr. Stocklmeir stated occasionalstoppagesoccur every one or two years in the septic tanks lines running from the residences. The commercial service RotoRooter is contracted to clean the lines in thoseinstances. Thetankis pumpedout everytwo yearsby A -Able SepticTankCompany. Three leachlinesfor thewastewaterrun undergroundinto theorchardarea: onenorth towardsthepump house, and the other two run northeast and east, respectively, into the orchard. Valves to control the flow of the lines are located near the septic tank inside PVC piping. No distressed vegetation was observed in the area of the leach field.

Mr. Stocklmeir stated that storm water at the subjectproperty either percolatesthrough the soil or flows eastto StevensCreek. No pavement is present at the subjectproperty exceptfor small patio areas. Accordingto Mr. Stocklmeir, astormwaterpipelineruns from thehousingdevelopment adjacent to the west side of the subject property across the orchard to Stevens Creek via an easement across the subject property. The eastern end of the pipe is visible as a corrugated metal pipe in the western side of the creek bed ( Photograph 12).

5. 8 Herbicides and Pesticides Use
Mr. Stocklmeirhired New View LandscapeServiceto performyard work atthe subjectproperty consisting of raking and collecting leavesand trimming the bushes. According to Mr. Stocklmeir, no herbicides or pesticides are currently used at the subject property.

Accordingto Mr. Stocklmeir, fertilizer hasnotbeenusedon theorangetreesin approximately10 years. When the orchard produced walnuts for commercial use, the walnut trees were sprayed with herbicides and pesticides. Mr. Stocklmeir stated that mixing or storing of chemicalsdid not occur at the subject property. The commercial orchard businessended in the late 1960s. No signs of distressed vegetation or stained soil were observed during the site walkthrough.

It is possible, although no evidence was found during this Phase I ESA, that the potential mismanagement of pesticides ( i.e., a spill during mixing or dilution and over application) from historical usesassociatedwith the orchard may have adversely impacted the subjectproperty. In general, pesticides have low vapor pressures, do not biodegrade, and adhere to soil extremely well.

Therefore, even though the property stopped serving as an orchard, pesticide residues may still be present in the soil. Farmers began to use DDT as a pesticide in the 1940s. Usually, DDT does not spread to more than a foot below ground surface ( Hayes, 1975).

According to Toxicology of Pesticides, " residues of pesticides in soil are rarely important as a source of direct exposure to people" ( Hayes, 1975). The only orchard maintenance occurring at the subject property is discing of the soil, which could significantly decreasethe residual pesticides at the subject property ( Hayes, 1975). The potential for residual pesticides in the soil to adversely affect human health is minimal. Major disturbance of the soil may increase potential for human exposure to residual pesticide potentially present in the soil. In general, high concentrations of certain pesticide compounds in soil can classify soil as hazardous waste.

5. 9 Lead - Based Paint
Due to the age of the buildings on the subject property, it is likely that lead- based paints have been used. During the site walkthrough, flaking paint and paint chips were observed on the window sills of the shop and on the walls of the western pump house ( Photographs 3 and 5). CDM observed no paint chips on the soil at these areas. Based on the extent of flaking paint, the potential for soil in contact with paint ships to have elevated levels of lead from the lead- based paint is minimal.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 5- 3
JAGUPERTIN\ PHASE- 1\SEC5. W PD
Section 6
Conclusions and Recommendations
This PhaseI ESA is basedupon information researchedand made available to CDM through May 5, 1999. Any subsequent information received by CDM which modifies the conclusions of this report will be submitted to the City of Cupertino Public Works Department in later correspondence.

Based on the information provided to CDM and observations made during the walkthrough of the subject property, no recognized environmental conditions at the subject property were discovered during the performance of the PhaseI ESA. No information was discovered that would suggest that off- site properties had released contaminants that would results in environmental contamination of the subject property.

However, due to the ageof the structures at the subjectproperty it is likely asbestos -containing material ( ACM) and lead- based paints were used during construction and any renovations. The existenceof friable and/ or non -friable ACM is possible in the wallboard, roofing, flooring, and chimney materials. During the site walkthrough, CDM made cursory visual observations for ACM and observed no material suspected of containing friable ACM. Prior to any renovation or demolition of the buildings at the subject property, CDM recommends a certified asbestos consultant conduct an asbestos survey of the buildings.

During the site walkthrough, flaking paint and paint chips were observed on the window sills of the shop building and on the wall of the western pump house. Basedon the extent of flaking paint, the potential for soil in contact with paint ships to have elevated levels of lead from the lead- based paint is minimal.

In addition, the subject property served as a commercial orchard until the late 1960s. It is possible, although no evidence was found during this Phase I ESA, that the potential mismanagement ( i.e., spill during mixing or dilution and over application) of pesticides from usesassociatedwith the orchard may have adversely impacted the subjectproperty. The potential for residual pesticides in the soil to adversely affect human health is minimal. The orchard maintenance that occurs at the subject property could reduce the residual pesticides in the soil. In general, high concentrations of certain pesticide compounds in soil can classify soil as hazardous waste. Prior to any major disturbance of the soil at the subject property, CDM recommends collecting soil samples to determine the extent of impact, if any.

Finally, one abandoned well exists at the easternpump housein the southwest section of the subject property. If the well will no longer be used, CDM recommendsproperly destroying the well with the approval of the Santa Clara Valley Water District.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 6- 1
JACU PERTI N\ PHASE- I\ SEC6. W PD
Section 7
References, contacts, and List of Acronyms Used
References
Department of Health Services, 1987. Letter to Mr. Phil Bobel, USEPA Region IX. April 8, 1987.

Department of Health Services, 1988. Letter to Mr. Pirooz Lahiji, Zilog Corporation, Subject:

Zilog Facility, 10640BubbRoad, Cupertino, EPAID No. CAD 076314459. October 13, 1988.

Department of Water Resources, 1964. " Quality of Ground Waters in California, 1961and 1962, Park I, Northern and Central California," State of California Department of Water Resources, Bulletin No. 66- 62, August 1964.

Department of Water Resources, 1975. " Evaluation of Ground Water Resources: South San Francisco Bay, Volume III: Northern Santa Clara County Area," State of California Department of Water Resources in cooperation with Santa Clara Valley Water District, Bulletin No. 118-1, December 1975.

EMCON Associates, 1993. Environmental Evaluation Report, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation, Permanente Facility, Cupertino, California. June 1993.

ENSCO Environmental Services, Incorporated, 1988. Letter to Mr. Rich Merkel, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation. June 6, 1988.

Exceltech, Incorporated, 1988. Soil and Groundwater Investigation for Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation. January 5, 1988.

Hayes, Wayland J., Jr., 1975. Toxicology of Pesticides. The Williams & Wilkins Company, Baltimore. 1975.

Pacific Aerial Survey, 1960. Aerial photograph AV 385/ 7/ 13. August 22, 1960.

Pacific Aerial Survey, 1968. Aerial photograph AV 857/1/ 7. July 15,1968.

Pacific Aerial Survey, 1978. Aerial photograph AV 1497/4/ 6. May 8, 1978.

Pacific Aerial Survey, 1989. Aerial photograph AV 3661/9/ 2. October 18, 1989.

RegionalWaterQuality ControlBoard, 1995. Letterto Mr. PhilGaynor, KaiserCement Corporation, Subject: Remedial Action Completion Certificate for 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA. December 21, 1995.

CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 7- 1
JACUPERTIN\ PHASE- 1\SEC7. WPD
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment
Section 7
References, Contacts, List of Acronyms Used
Santa Clara Valley Water District, 1999. Letter to Mr. Earl Bouse, Hanson Permanente Cement, Subject:

Fuel Leak Investigation at Kaiser Cement, 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA. March 2, 1999.

United States Geological Survey, Cupertino Quadrangle, California, 15 Minute Series (Topographic), 1961, photorevised 1980.

Western Regional Climate Center, 1999. SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA ( 047821), Period of RecordMonthly Climate Summary, Period of Record: 71111948 to 12/ 31/ 1998. Web site http:// www. wrcc. dri. edu/ cgi- bin/ cliMAIN. p l?casjos+sfo.

Contacts
Santa Clara County Recorder Santa Clara County Assessor 70West Hedding Street, EastWing, 1stFloor 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 5th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 San Jose, CA 95110
408- 299- 2481 408- 299- 3227
Adele Shepherd David Bar
Jeanette Townsend SanFranciscoBay Regional Water Quality Santa Clara Valley Water District Control Board
5750 Almaden Expressway 1515 Clay Street, # 1400
San Jose, CA 95118 Oakland, CA 94612
408- 265- 2600 510- 622- 2300
Bob Bondy Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Pacific Gas and Electric Company 939 Ellis Street
10900 North Blaney Avenue San Francisco, CA 94109
Cupertino, CA 95014
408- 725- 2204
Alan Stocklmeir
10240 Stonydale Drive
Cupertino, CA 95014
408- 738- 3758
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 7- 2
JACU P ERTI N\ PHASE- 1\SEC7. W PD
Cupertino Public Works Department
Phase l Environmental Site Assessment
List of Acronyms Used
Section 7
References, Contacts, List of Acronyms Used
ACM Asbestos -Containing Material
AST Aboveground storage tank
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
AWP California Annual Workplan
CA SLIC California Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup CA WDS California Waste Discharge System
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CERC- NFRAP CERCLIS - No Further Response Action Planned Facilities CERCLIS CERCLA Information System
CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Information Reporting System CONSENT Superfund Consent Decrees
CORRACTS Corrective Actions
DHS California Department of Health Services
DTSC Department of Toxic Substance Control
DWR California Department of Water Resources
EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc.

ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
ESA Environmental Site Assessment
FID California Facility Inventory Database
FINDS Facility Index System
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting Systems KACC Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation
LUST Leaking underground storage tank
mg/ kg millograms per kilogram
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
NPL National Priorities List
PADS PCB Activity Database
PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl
PG& E Pacific Gas and Electric Company
RAATS RCRA administration action tracking system
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
ROD Records of Decision
RWQCB San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board SCVWD Santa Clara Valley Water District
SWF/ LF Solid Waste Facilities / Landfill
SWRCB State Water Resource Control Board
TPH Total petroleum hydrocarbons
TRIS Toxic Release Inventory Database
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TSD Treat, store, or dispose ( of hazardous waste)
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
UST Underground storage tank
WMUDS/ SWAT Waste Management Unit Database
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 7- 3
JACU P ERTI N\ PHASE- 1\SEC7. W PD
Appendix A
Site Photographs
143
11 vo
r -
ell
IV
k
f,jfti 1.
i
Vb
b /
46 l... i ,
mow.'
11 F
ell
IV
F
ell
k
Vb
N
IRS
ij.
lip
z -w
an
fit
ki
Tl
April 22, 1999
Photograph 7
Photographed By:

Andria Pomponi
Description: Orange trees
in main orchard area.

April 22, 1999
Photograph 8
Photographed By:

Andria Pomponi
Description: Walnut and
apricot trees in northern
orchard area.

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California
D
April 22, 1999
Photograph 9
Photographed By:

Andria Pomponi
Description: Piles of
building materials along
western edge of subject
property.

April 22, 1999
Photograph 10
Photographed By:

Andria Pomponi
Description: Abandoned
propane AST along
subject property
driveway.

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California
April 22, 1999
Photograph 11
Photographed By:

Andria Pomponi
Description: Septic tank
used for main residence
and studio apartment,
along driveway.

April 22, 1999
Photograph 12
Photographed B;
Andria Pomponi
Description: Loc
along StevensC
where residentia
stormwater line
along eastern ed
subject property

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California
Appendix B
Information Reviewed
i
2 3
4 5
7 9
1C
1 1J
14 13-
i55Z5
17 13
7 Q
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 2' 7
28 LAW 0MCKa
ortrelc. A
rO.. t AYC. Y[
TING. CA 35014
59- CS91
REC. FUEE i l _
MICS0
IN THE SUPERIOR CCURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFO- RN_ A OTB +, IN AND - 70R THE CCU -: TY Or SANTA CLARA E,
1PF
In re the - Estate of ) No. i06206
1jU-
C- GM_ ENT OF DISTRZBUTZGN
LOUTS STCC{ L.. j7IR j ON -., JA 7, r:--'

OF , CCGJNTING
Decedent_ ) Hearing a* e. : larch
1 2cJ' 984
GLAD71S 3. S_ CC:{ X_-- _ R, _ s t , e Executorc f e Estate o - LOUIS E. S1' CC :_ 4E1, deceased, hav_ na heretofcr- e filed ' her verified re crt cf ixec: ltCr on Waivers cz AccCunting and Petition for Final tD1 j:.._ tr . 7LI_ Cn, and t:+ e same C;'* i_ ng on - h47, duv reQlllu_' 1v fOT hE' ar7n-, the Court finds:

Due nctice of the hear4 na of the ceti tion has oeen regularly I '
given as requ: red by law.

I
I
All allegations of the Petition are true.

FILED FIR RECORD
1: }
MT T

FROST LACI OFFICES
10413
Ai lUE...

Torre Avenue
1* y0 G 9 1084
Cupertino, CA 95014P
Z9 1240 !' 1.

Ce,, ntj Clc:%
Telephone: ( 408) 253- 053_: y
GrylC! AL RECORDS
JAMES A_ FROST
S.i' A CLARA COUNT.

GE A. ) AANN
3•,.

DEPUTY
Attorney for Petitioner T? AR REGMER
REC. FUEE i l _
MICS0
IN THE SUPERIOR CCURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFO- RN_ A
OTB +,
IN AND - 70R THE CCU -: TY Or SANTA CLARA E, 1PF
In re the - Estate of )
No. i06206
1jU- C- GM_ ENT OF DISTRZBUTZGN
LOUTS STCC{ L.. j7IR j ON -., JA
7,
r:--'

OF , CCGJNTING
Decedent_ ) Hearing a* e. :
larch 12cJ' 984
GLAD71S 3. S_ CC:{ X_-- _ R, _ s t , e Executorc f e Estate o - LOUIS E. S1' CC :_ 4E1, deceased,
hav_ na heretofcr- e filed ' her verified
re crt cf ixec: ltCr on Waivers cz AccCunting and Petition for Final tD1 j:.._ tr . 7LI_ Cn, and t:+ e same C;'* i_
ng
on -
h47, duv reQlllu_' 1v fOT hE' ar7n-,
the Court finds:

Due nctice of the hear4 na of the ceti tion has oeen regularlyI ' given as requ: red by law.

I I
All allegations of the Petition are true.

LOUIS E. STCCXL.; SEIR died testate on September 24, 1982, in1 i
the County
of Santa Clara,, State of California, and was a resident thereof at the time of his death_
Decedent' s Will dated November 18,
1977 was admitted to Probate
by Order of this Court on vanuary 3, 1983. Petitioner qualified as Executor and Letters Testamentary were issued to Petitioner on
January 3, 1983,
and at all times since then has been and now
is the Executor of decedent' s Will_
9I+ yRA'!'! i" ziR-..,. .-:- ,. ,...•. . 1 .._....-.-_„.__.....-._.-___._.._.-.-.._.__.._.-,.__.._.._.__. _._...__.. ......... ..._- 1410- 636
1 Notice to Creditors has been duly given as required by law, 2 the time for filing or presenting claims has expired, and the 3 estate is now in a condition to be closed.
1 No claims have been filed or presented against the estate. 5 ` All debts of the decedent and of the estate and all the expenses 6 ! of the administration except closing expenses, attorney' s fees, - 7 Executor- conlissions,
and certain costs advanced by the attorney
8 have been paid.
9 An AmendedInvento- y and Aopraiser,etit of the estate was duly 10 returned and tiled cn December 5, 1983, showing the value of the 11 decedent' s estate to be $ 613, 220. 00.
12 All personal prooerty taxes due and payable by the estate, 13 if any, have been paid. A clearance is on file.
14 A federal estate tax return has been filed for the estate 15 and the tax shown in the return has been paid. The total state 16 death tax credit allowable for federal and state tax purposes has 17 been calculated and paid to the State of California. The return 18 has not yet been audited. Petitioner has not been released from 19 personal liability for federal, estate tax.
20 All California state_ and federal income taxes becoming due 21 and payable during the period of administration of the estate if 22 any, and the filing of closing fiduciary income tax return will 23 be assumed by the Petitioner.
24 The Waivers vi Accounting by JANET L. STOCKLMEIR, ALAN L. 25 STOCKLMEIR, and DFAMN STOCKLMEIR, all the beneficiaries and 26 remaindermen under the Will of the decedent are on file herein. 27 The Petitioner should be authorized and directed to pay to 28 herselZ the sum of $
13, 414. 40 in discharge of statutory commissions
T Ll. w FFICL! S
A OIt[< IOt L
2-
LOMVIIN,. ltli.

GUPCHTINO. U 91010
00) 11: 2- 0131
4mm.. .. 0n,,., _ a 3a : r+Ja+. k t a `. r it -
r: 4 • ....

F , 7
i ,
1 The Petitioner should be authorized and directed to pay to 2 JAMES A. FROST, Esq. the sum of $
13,414.40 as the statutory attorney
3 fess for his services rendered to the administration in. this estate, i4 in the sum of $ 350. 80 for costs advanced. +
i
5 The Petitioner should be authorized to retain $:; 00. 00 in cash 6 pending a final audit of tax returns, and for any liabilities that 7 may be determined to be due from the estate.
8 Distribution should be ordered as prayed for in the Petition 9 and as hereinafter in this Order specified.
10 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT:
li 1. The administration of this estate is brought to a close, 12 without requirement of an accounting.
13 2. All the acts and proceedings of the Petitioner as Executor 14 relating to matters set forth in the Petition are ratified, confirmL 15 and approved.
16 3.

The Executor is authorized and directed to pay to herself 17 the sum of $ 13, 414. 40, statutory commission for services rendered 18 to the estate.
19 4. The Executor is authorized and directed to pay to the 20 attorney, JAMES A. FROST, Esq., the sum of $ 13, 414. 40, the statutor} 21 fees for servicos rendered in the administration of this estate, 22 and the sum of $ 350. 80 for certain costs advanced. 23 5. Petitioner is authorized to retain $ 300. 00 for closing 24- expenses of administration and as a reserve for a possible tax 25 deficiencies, and to deliver the unused part to the Trustee appoint( 26 herein without further Court order after the closing expenses have 27 been paid and the various taxes have been finally determined 28 settled.
9T % W OFFICES
c ueanw_
3 _
rneror. wr urr,
io nlnec wvc.. u[
V. WD—. D. CA 35014
401 157. 0531
I
1 2
J
4 51
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 7BT LAW OFFICER
M(] I[ C. IUHAI

UNMIINA TIQN
IO. IJ TU.. 0 - C- C
CUI• ERTIND. CA 95014
4: 18) 753. 0531
14 ( 53

6. Notice to Creditors has been given as required by law;

7. The Executor has in her possession belonging to said estate and remaining for distribution the following described property which is to be distributed in the following manner in accordance with the terms of decedent' s Will dated November 18, 1977: -
a. To DEAN STOCKLMEIR as to a one- half (_ 1/ 2) interest and to ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR and JANET L. STOCKLMEIR, in equal shares, as to a one- half interest in the miscellaneous fur: ziture, furnishin, and personal effects located at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulev? rd, Cupertino, California.
b. The real property described herein below„ is distribu;_ d to DEAN STCCKLMEIR and ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR, in trust, to be held, administered, and distributed by the Co - Trustees in accordance with the terms of the decedent' s Will dated November 18, 1977:
1) Unimproved real property in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as:

ALL OF LOTS 30 and 31, as shown on the Map entitled,
TRACT NO. 5915 THE MEADOWS OF CUPERTINO", which Map
was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County cf Santa Clara, State of California on November 30, 1976, in Book 384 of Maps, at pages 18 and 19.
2) ResidentaV real property commonly ; mown as 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California and situated in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows:

PARCEL NO. 1
Beginning at the Southeast corner of Section No. 278
as delineai- d and so designated on the Map hereinafter referred to; thenco running among the Easterly lines
of Sections No. 278, 275 and 275 A as shown on said Map, N.
120
1' W. 402 feet to the Southeasterly line of Scenic
Boulevard; thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly line of Scenic Boulevard, 76. 33 feet; thence S. 0° 7'
W. to the Northwesterly corner of said Section 275 and
continuing S. 0° 7' W. along the Test line of said Section 275 and along the extension of said West line a total
distance of 334. 30 feet to a point on the South line
4-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
7 28

IOST LAW OFFICES
rHorr u mui
UHVfIpAI ON
ia. 0 rt1HHc wvrHu[
r: OPIERTIN0, CA 95014
409) 357. 0331
n 1410.
1-
639
of said Section 278distant thereonEast 25 feet fromthe Southwest corner of said Section 278; thence East130. 35 feet to the point of beginning, and being all
of SectionsNumbered275and275Aandpartsof SectionsNumbered 274 and 278, as said Sections are delineatedand so designated upon that certain Map entitled, " Mapof Inspiration Point, Monta Vista", and which Map was
filed for recordin theoffice of theRecorderof theCounty of Santa Clara, State of California, on April11, 1917, in Book " P" of Maps, page 18.

PARCEL NO. 2
Beginningat thepointof intersectionof theSoutherlyline of Stevens Creek Road, as it formerly existed 40feet wide, with the center line of Stevens Creek; thence in a generalSoutherlydirection alongthe centerlineOf Stevens Creek the following courses and distances; S. 480
30' E. 110, 55 feet; S.
590
45' E. 132. 00 feet; S. 45° E. 162. 03 feet; S. 3° 37' E. 122. 10 feet; S. 4° 8' W. 231. 66 feet; S. 24° W. 80. 26 feet; S. 36° T4. 199. 32feet; S. 2S° W. 54. 12 feet; and S. 36° 30' W. 107. 38feet to a station designated D. S.. 5 from which a sycamc_ e14 inches in diameter market B. T. D. S. 5 bears S. 360 45' E. 17. 82 feet; thence leaving the center line of Stevens
Creekand running along the Easterly line of MontaVistaPark, the Map of which is of record in Bo - k " P" of Maps, page 19, Santa Clara County Records, and along theEasterly line of Inspiration Point, Monta Vista, the Map of which is of record in Book " P" of Maps, page 18, Santa Clara County Records, the following courses anddistances; N. 40 41' W.
339. 24 feet to a station designatedD. S. 4; N. 4° 11' W. 191. 40 feet to a pipe; and N. 12° 1' W. 448.00 feet to a pipe at the Northeasterly cornerof said Inspiration Point, Monta Vista; thence N. 37° 42' W.

13.00 feet to a pipe on said Southerly line ofStevens Creek Road; thence along said Southerly lineof Stevens Creek Road, N.' 890
E. 84. 48 feet to the pointof beginning, containing 4. 857 acres of land, more orless, and being a portion of the San Antonio Rancho,
and being shown upon that certain Map entitled, " Mapof a survey made for Adelheid M. Stocklmeir in the SanAntonio Ranch", which Map was filed for record in the
office of the Recorder or the Recorder of the Countyof Santa Clara, State of California, on Decemb.- r 29, 1915, in "-. ok " O" of Maps, page 88.

C. Decedent' s Will, dated November 18, 1977, provides as follows:

I. I further give,
devise and bequeath to the said DEAN
STOCKLMEIR and ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR, as Co - Trustees, in trust, my 5-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
i
11 1: 2
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

RO LAW OFFICES
HUI I' RRtU. a AL
U HI• IIHwtIU.
14 1:
1_ IIIFHC wVl. I. uC
ru 7TINII. C; 95014
re) U5: 1• U571
a,
interest, if Ltny,
in any real property that mysaid wife and I are
using as our principal residence at the time of my death. Such residence shall be held, administered, sold, or distributed in accordance with the trust provisions se,: forth hereinbelow.

2. Said trust shall terminate uponthe deathof mywife,
GLADYS BOYER STOCKLMEIP.. Upon the death of my wife, then the Co- Trustees' shall distribute and deliver free of trust, all of the then balance of the trust estate, as follows, to wit:
a. On
th_ reof to my said son, DEAN STOCKLMEIR.
b.

One-half thereof to my said grandchildren, ALAN L.

STOCKLMEIR and JANET L. STOCKLIKEIR, in equal sharps, or to the survivor of them,
if either should predeceasemeor die before the
termination of this trust, .
end leavt3 no issue surviving.

3. To carry out the purposes of the trust, the Co - Trustees are vested with the following powersin addition to those nowor hereafter confirmed by law,
affecting the trust and trust estate:
a)
Wheneverthe right of any beneficiary to
receive payments from net income or principal hereundershall terminate, either by reason of death or otherwise,
all such payments accrued or undistributed by theCo -Trustees at the date of such termination shall be distributed in equal shares to the beneficiaries
entitled to the successive interest hereunder, or
if they `) e deceased but survived by issue, then to
such issue in accordance with the provisions hereof.
b)
Upon any division of partial or finaldistribution of the trust estate, and except as herein specifically provided, the Co - Trustees maydivide or distribute such property in kind, includingundivided interests therein, or in their absolute discretion the Cc -Trustees maysell all or any part
of such property and make such division or distributionin cash or partly in cash and partly in kind; and the decision of the Co -Trustees as to what constitutes a proper division of the trust estate either prior
to or uponany distribution thereof shall be binding
upon all of the beneficiaries.
i —
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 J'
3 H
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 RON
9T' AW OFFICES
s • nu ura
r1 nus nun
u 1aw. c s u uc
PrurIN0. c. 75014
40V - - 253- 0531
c) The Ca - Trustees shall have the power, with
respect to the property of the trust estate or anypart thereof, and upon such terms and in such manner as they may deem advisable, to sell, convey, exchange,
Convert, improve, repair, manage, operate, and control; to lease for terms within or beyond the term of this
trust and for any purpose, including exploration for
and removal of gas, oil and other minerals; to borrow
money for any trust purpose, and to encumber or
hypothecate by mortgage, deed of tru_ t, pledge or
otherwise; to carry insurance of such kinds and in -
such amounts as the Co -Trustees may deem advisable,
at the expense of the trust; to compromise or otherwise adjust any claims against or in favor of the trust;
to commence or defend such litigation with respect
to the trust or any property of the trust estate as
it may deem advisable, at the expense of the trust;
to invest and reinvest the trust moundsin such property as the Co - Trustees may deem advisable; whether or
not of the character permitted by law for the investment of trust funds; and with respect to securities held
in trust, to vote, give proxies, and pay assessments
or other charges, to participate in foreclosures,
reorganizations, consolidations, mergers ancf liquidations, and incident thereto to deposit securities with and
transfer title to any protective or other committee
upon such terms as the Co - Trustees may deem advisable, and to exercise or sell stock subscription or conversion rights; and the Co - Trustees shall have such additional powers as may now or hereafter be conferred upon it
by law or as may be necessary to enable the Co -Trustees to administer this trust in accordance with the provisions of this Will, subject to any limitations thereof that
may be provided herein.
d) The Co - Trustees are authorized to loan or
advance their own funds to, the trust for any purpose
thereof, at the then current rate of interest, and
any such loan or advance, together with interest shall
be a first lien against the trust estate and shall
be repaid therefrom.
e) ' 2he Co - Trustees may hold securities or other
property in this trust in their name as Co - Trustees
hereunder, or in their own name, or in the name of
their nominee, or the Co - Trustees may hold such
securities unregistered in such condition that
ownership will pass by delivery.
f) Ail property taxes, assessments, fees,
charges and other expenses incurred by the Co -
Trustees in the administration or protection of this
trust,
including the compensation allowed by the Court
to the Co - Trustees and their attorneys for their services hereunder, shall be a charge upon the trust estate
7—
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24:
25 26
27 28
iCMT LAW OFFICES
rnn • eiaH t ',
r.• ua r ar.
1w• nlewt AV( MIIC
ZUP CIN(]• CA 79010
l d+ df 75: 1. 05. 11
r
I U. 0 642
and sha11 be paid by the Co -Trustees in full out of
the principal or in full out of the income of the
trust estate, or partially out of each of them, in
such mangier and proportions as the Co -Trustees in
heir absolute discretion maydetermineto be advisable,
prior to final distribution of the trust property; and the determination of the Co -Trustees with respect to all such matters shall be conclusive upon all
persons however interested in this trust.
g) ` Phe Co -Trustees shall have full power and
authority to determine, in their ahsclute discretion,
what shall constitute principal of the trust estate,
gross income .therefrom and net income distributable
under the terms of this trust; except as herein
otherwise specifically provided, and the determination
of the Co -Trustees with respect to all such matters
shall be conclusive upon all persons howsoevez
interested in this trust.
h)
No beneficiary of this trust shall have
any right to alienate, encumber, or hypothecate his
or her interest in the principal or income of the
trust in any manner,
nor shall such into - est of any
such beneficiary be subject to claims of his or her
creditors or liable to attachment, execution or other
process of j, w.
i)
I hereby appoint as Co -Trustees of the trust
created herein, DEAN STOCKLHEIR and ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR. A Trustee shall ; nave the right to resign at any time,
and upon such resignation if no successor Trustee
be herein designated, the Trustee resigning or any
beneficiary of the trust may secure the appointment
OE a successor Trustee by a Ccurt of competent
jurisdiction, at the expense of the trust.
j) The successor of a Trustee, whether through
death or resignation as Trustee hereunder, or otherwise, shall
forthwith become a successor Trustee hereunder,
and shall succeed to all title of a Trustee to the
trust estate, and all powers, rights, discretions,
obligations, and immunities of a Trustee hereunder,
with the game effect as though such successor were
originally named herein as Trustee.

4. Any ocher property of the estate not now known or discover, which may belong to the estate, or in which the decedent or the estate may have: any interest, is distributed to DEAN STOCKLMEIR i
SP -;
643
1 as to a one- half ( 1/ 2) interest therein and to ALAN L. STOCKLMEIR 2 and JANET L. STOCKLMEIR, in equal shares as to a one- half ( 1/ 2) 3 interest therein.
4 DATED: , -.,, . „- 1984
5I

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
7 8
9 10
SIO R
s
12 a * ' ® tart i copyof, the0611A
13 h'
r T —
A
1 " a
ST
14 e% ... - ®. ' County Clerk
L • •,' S ta Clara
i 15 rir
p County
4( t
ttl
u, as` a Sh Geri a
n-
atn: e Clam H( tspt
gS
erior
C)
a t
IiY 1/ A t`
LYdISeatiClue
DEPUTY
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 RosT LAW OFFICES
AOROi [\ 10', L
9_
Q. l3 r ... c — C. U[
CUP[ RTINO. CA 95014
40B) 753. 0531
All t \ 7`,,
3:.}' '.; r w:.
s:
ui ;
I
I, :,' j 1_.-.'' u: f ):
o- rua"_ i xi„ ky,
r_c,
c . c . r r.
g 1';'FAd'
i.. yq '' t '
f'^ 4:
7 \ Y ,
aI . - -
s ' 1
rg
F y'
a" T>—'
j C
T S? ,
it l '
I
tt°. r 4•, i y S%
r 1 , ' rye,
i i• W -
L11
Tt ' X :. 1 : ltlil`` . ` I 4 ]
qty sf-,,$.,y7,.,': `
gyp,
t(
I /" ' 1y y,] 1^,
f
k
L t }
i`
C.• 1 In t' 1' i : f9"'+ %- s.
i+ i'
r1TP'
t.

1. b. i..,
t • 4i,+
1-,
1 , T7i •':
7 y'YI
Cr -
7' M"
T4
f y , .(
IY •.
1 yr
4 ra. _,: : rt_f •'•+ .` }'' ' . ^ c' .
y y
l- .. R LLt:,. 1 • 4 ` f!" ' ETeI:' ! ` 7 E u EEuvu. y , + I::• c [ i {
7;.•'}
f' f _ i t' ':•,
7'L: ,<' f.'/ '
e `
vax """' t_i y11 ' i, yq" .. Q,. 4
t','•
t ` .
r ••' `
Scn.
3`'' `
r ' ''' fi
i s ` Ur.C.'- . 5=
s ,• -_ •. '
c-' G_, •',;
e`,
r'•
ss'S1r+ t...• `
j:
f , i.••,... '
J
7_;.. rte+ !( Q•!',:` /
i'T '
r'
lr.
a
N ,
G 4
f_ _ MFE -'
i_,
g _
1 '•''.
la: t '
rjt'' ± a
I uvy+ yy•
C43r
fF ` T t $ ry -.•' , r , r. :' ' S
4+
Sl,` L"t. tJ
I
r+t,
yl,,, i
N. , 6. F,( I '•
t'
l . t,'' r. M1'l v . r '•"-'
P". ;'' S
r„'` 3 } 1
hcar
i t' 9 j
1; t
f
n_ ;;'"
fi,
tY!.
5 . ? p c> :, t
t 1 - t i 2' •
f `
yy ?'
itl_.'l
cam. + : , +

5. a' kt, 2'' t 4h
Cf
riE ~ }{^ •'
t
1 a -.

F
r'.•• .. -
rG
tI' ---- ,
1"'
I'':.";
irl}'{' h[1.'.,. 1'' t.,_ ,
1!?,-,
a',
a, I> y4t JR+ , r'
r
rT.. € ii •.,, L'
X';
cit- L: `. . I;" s'
fy a. 1frF.>, ` i:'
a2'^ p.Y, {; "
t:`° ` Y
w . >,<,._ I t - i •• ) ,\ i' r {
r'
Ep
v . r, . - 1 µ"+ 3 jt
V,
ri S- y
y.'• j, t ' i11
i
k.[ -, f;'' 1 4 `„
F'
1-' ( F: J r
S
I
q -
r ,
d •
i 7r-
tt%'' y, , tf.
a, S q'` E: Ir
yi'
t
I • ii:,
le t ,...
c'+
3'
Ya•
y."` ; ` 1 :....
4 •[
I''..' g7nS. i . ti ':. 7,
3ri„
a^ t' , .
y' j
L'
f
r'+
kE
a'> r - •
1 ,
i t<..+.
1 .[' r.” ,tl
stf u
z -
ei* , t :
kT `ay.,
yj. ',
fi. f + . - ' v.

Yi,. 1 .
i }
1 r} t +• d . f , L
u+' i
9Y t ,. a - i_ Y ,
r '.

Kz
yr
7 S4*
1 i/ ^
N t {` y
h . t, .•,t`
y
t . . w > + r :
x - _ ,
r < ,
I w : j >;•.....,. fY -1 C } r' S7 ' r ; i• :"•.....%' r e,,°•
1 r ' '>+ Ij Li • *
t +
J
Yk
a
i"
4 ^
w ' i i.;
y}p
y`' ••' tt.
a :, "
1t SL }rd}
5 . t vkS' 1Y4` r' " . f• !'i. 11l s '+' r cr se
e
5 f_ - M _ +':
y •t r,;, re ltl t4. C, f. ,
j
F
7 .:,^ r,:,
yam[
U '';`
4 i ,<.,
f
4 - ii. `•
LC/' G^ Fr [ ,v 1 Ci.. "`
t' - `
t, ` ,
r I, o+ l ,
f .i, W',,yy,.<
et
y •
1 :':: 4'
q{
F\
t
1, . r';
i"
c }
il r•
i' o r t 11 . i } ya.
pV`''
alj '.

C!>•8 '
I- +"' ' - ''-' ' . : i ` 1- ' , .

4. 3t"
n
1f
l
r
a 7 4y,
i•'' a'` 4'
Z? t{. r # 11 > '
Z
s fyrr*
s• i ' t+ i
y4r} Y•
ig0^
t cij?
Try-
y,`
N;_
ojyk1, ''
li + • ,
L . ` rf'
t'' :,
tq c
t
w d ,
yo- 4•' r J Rr*.'• S 7.
t
i.% •+
i.• -
r'' L' p'
K {; i
t jL, i7 ': yv
9 t _
y
i A • . t "
5 . E;
r i
t F•
ti :
2 #,. S,T"
P
l
p:. `% h ' , z .•-,
Tib #•_ '
l / ._''' n :
c.. ;. •(
Y t _ •
i7 gyp`_?, t,,, .
1k,,..•
f1..^ Sti b. .. i"-.-;
J+
i.
pp . / Lir: a
t I
St;.' . r '.}
1 ci
b1W'', _ ',
i.
r , •" ' :
e
1 •, ->
s, r
y
x
4I l'
1`;
T
rj'
A F! i'• iT^"
i\+ C P, k:i'
S.
f -
f
v
e . • }..
sj':
s] .` •
t _
a t'
An i ' .'= t 7-•...? t
I . ?
M. r I is
f 1 .'• F
f•' . • .' `
Xl=/. • t'!: ,
lJ
rt{,
A' b' a +
i. _ \•
F
ry
4K
t
ter, Aerial
PhotographAugust22, 1960 AERIA
YS 8407 Edgewater
DriveOv. Hand, CA
94621
0 ( 510) 632-
ir. IV? -
m
Aerial Photograph
July 15, 1968
IF
P
A' ILI
iq4,.F.aA,
W-4iO dio
A
W,
4 EPA
0 F -
J
P Vi
4141
ho
01 r.

DW6iI
r
vtn '
YY.; fjIg
kip
Wt Val
M
T; 1
V
2 7-
loxfl 4.

LLJ
V
r?
tip,
4 IN I
7W01
N.

X
i. 1.
4 Ad
7'.

Iwof
f.

K
3 iL I'A
INA
fiiE
A
I! V
S;R
a
AERIAF' 1rMEYS
8407 Edge -water Drive
0,-! z1and, CA 94621 - ( 510) 632- 2020
143M
Aerial Photograph
May 8, 1978 AERIA'FtCIRVEYS
8407 Edgewater Drive
O,.! Jr-ind, CA 94621 • ( 510) 632- 2020
1 1Atii.. •,. + Cid`. • .,
t
y
7,`; .• F,. . 7+. , „ 1• !' j
r `, ''
nYi ,. fr1,;, '' °.
r
y r, ,' e J .. f ,, 1T+ . • .
7 ^ ' _. ! `,
t
emir, i.. 1 4
Lf -
i'. 1 :
41Y
r
yr .7} , .,.. 1f
J'+
At
y 1#,•' `
1 ; r, j', f• i(
F„ ,. fi+. ! yaia F! Jc.,
dy1 ;
l: Y
j`•. +.. ` i.. ft, f' F 1`;
F ! ...+'-
4':
l .{ e J!'" f= gtis.. ,;`. : Al
cIt
H ?!+. r1., r
i' a. i' - ail .:.,, • 1',': k i,•! f
5, • j ••. ,.\,
f, J ''
i ''
r. dy '..•. " ' .
w.
a ;+ " L f11. +i: 3
ar ` y• i l., JEb"
a, i.* ? + rl...
i ?,,.?.• f+, , :
s
m
Y 4'
s z;,' iK, r ` il: E ' i'. '"
yr f
jl' • II '
gi . E - } t ' fL
t_ _ 3 , 1 ' ..

J'
r 1_. w b•. / f "., , . moi i' LI J. I C, .. - _ ,.•„? 1 .. 1
J
r,: .; z•
4Y
s:^,. t• ` 75y 1GJ
f +
r ty
u1IH_! ?
P .
4 J. a;. i?' 93"', r fyj «, 1'+ Ji r-.

T3`
S,4t `
y *
IT
t. JI
V. •
R. {
1, 1•(.,
1111' *.
i -
J.
i
11+
x,
1•• 1 )' y '_
r.. '
iF il .+.` '
14 4 } ,-" {
j F ••
I
ra -
v -
ft . f.'
a • .¢.
wr ,` ;
aay__t_ N, ti t!
s In - 4 d;
a e ; !
44 ;,..,
t
j :- y! S','ti yr;
71,.,? ., if Y
af', >> 01W,•. r T ?•
a' r ;
i a't `. i • * ' ra L' , til.« y a { ri J [ .. aq'• i+.? r:.. caner ,+
r• '" .".'
i1i,
i +
4 A
wt n . °" ^;
4 n Y14. ! /',
R
ref •,; ;
i,z
r'9 ` ; ,..
y .
ln .
r
J`. +, j/f +. l 1•J,_ 3• 4!`.. 1`.:,
SIT
w L
S. "'i. k',
n F = ieJlii' !' :,'
r !' # *
i. . N°t±. i" aS j!
tl i IN
L •
t. '
a ";. , M {
SII . '-
i f _
r f
g¢
IF
y Y Y
EC•
i. .. ~. +. i'! tr• ".
3 Y : il '. l+
lcr, 1'Yl''; A4y + hY+ Y" - ,
A, ljj " p , ga K,; r
4rC
i:. + glon
Y. {'
c' .' 3t•' h' ` - . ; . -" > F$• w`-" r y!
F',. T+ :, . fI , s X' ` _ ',
e.
w "," r• Y +
g
r
r,.,.• la a
K ;
y1f
YL t • 7181
i4! +• i '"
w.' `, .

K
k ..' '+(
j'
j,'
C ,
r'.
y,
V' t'
1 a .

TJ` i1' S
C ti(''' i
y , .
t`
y
t
1+ k ' •
r , ±,
xy!•+ s
r
if -. w -, r ' ii
ss{ • , f i . r
l
h"
k. . t^,
t. f - '= - ' i L '. ;
f - '\'!
j ' fill,
M1 .
i } l1 • '" ` t
r. }` ,
R .

Jei
j .. °
n I ,• , t 2. f'
a 1
aw '-
iJ'% '- '' f r' +
j
i s. k
y-
1• j *
o.

C.l: , ` fi' {. i '•`''-
y7y _ y.
a' f' •. r
g
7i
j
j _ tt. i
a + '+
A `'• il.'; , ., Y-
Y .,, `
n ['
a '
i
i;"'+"}• '`: `+,,-.,, _. s:
r+
i+
1 `•
lr} Y_

1. t1s-.
1Q lRti1 '.
3 i l '
l4
x : ii `.

1. . ti t r
f •
le ,. =
m M , {. t;: i; .
e:
a
t
r
ar1 *

3. t'! „,
7ql ..;, . ;
f , +,, _
tR
r :
rC. t ' } -, it-; ' .
i' i K -' t } y;,y-.

Y ;` ( *' ' •
1+
r1
ys- . iyaa '\
frfA
rc'
l
r , j • 1 5 1
qty
u jY
I•C^' '!
w
C' ` •
it .

L .
ti' '
1 •' '
Q
i! 1 '.. ,/
I' . . 11'
lrct } . ir '
j . •
s
p
Sri4\
s YJI 1 , i . n . ' C . 2 "
i `
7 t , r yN,
j..+
J. ', . j
1' x+. }
t
r, ;,
2 / fl1 s isi• I•.. 1 .

Appendix C
EDR Report
The EDR- Radius Map
with GeoCheck°
22120 Stevens Creek Blvd.
22120 Stevens Creek Blvd.

Cupertino, CA 95014
Inquiry Number: 359034.1s
April 15, 1999
Environmental
Data
Resources, Inc.
an.:. edr- company
The Source
For Environmental
Risk Management
Data
3530 Post Road
Southport, Connecticut 06490
Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: 1- 800- 352- 0050
Fax: 1- 800- 231- 6802
Internet: www. edrnet. com

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary------------------------------------------------------- ES1 Topographic Map--------------------------------------------------------- 2 GeoCheckSummary ------------------------------------------------------ 3 Overview Map----------------------------------------------------------- 5 DetailMap-------------------------------------------------------------- 6 Map Summary - All Sites--------------------------------------------------- 7 Map Summary - Sites with higher or the same elevation as the Target Property--------- 8 MapFindings------------------------------------------------ 9 Orphan Summary-- ------------------------------------ 40

APPENDICES
GeoCheck Version 2. 1 ----------------------------------------------------- Al Government Records Searched / Data Currency Tracking Addendum- - - - _ _ A13 Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1- 800- 352- 0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer and Other Information
This Report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources and Environmental Data Resources, Inc. ( EDR) makes no representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, reliability, quality, suitability, or completeness of said information or the information contained in this report. The customer shall assume full responsibility for the use of this report.

NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, SHALL APPLY AND EDR SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF SUCH WARRANTIES. IN NO

Unless otherwise indicated, all trademarks used herein are the property of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.

TC359034. 1s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc.

EDR). The report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, E 1527- 97. Search distances are per ASTM standard or custom distances requested by the user.

The address of the subject property for which the search was intended is 22120 STEVENS CREEK BLVD.

CUPERTINO, CA 95014
No mapped sites were found in EDR' s search of available ( " reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the subject property or within the ASTM E 1527- 97 search radius around the subject property for the following Databases:

NPL:_________________________ National Priority List
Delisted NPL:________________ NPL Deletions
RCRIS- TSD:----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System AWP: -------------- AWP
CHMIRS:_____________________ California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Toxic Pits:___________________ Toxic Pits
CERCLIS:____________________ Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
CERC- NFRAP:--------------- Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
SWF/ LF:--------------------- State Landfill
UST:_________________________ Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database Ca. FID:______________________ CA FID
AST:_________________________ Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities RAATS:---------------------- RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System WMUDS:--------------------- WMUDS/ SWAT
RCRIS- SOG:----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS- LOG:----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System HMIRS:______________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System PADS:_______________________ PCB Activity Database System ERNS: ----------------------- Emergency Response Notification System FINDS:_______________________ Facility Index System/ Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report TRIS: ------------------------- Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA: ------------------------ Toxic Substances Control Act MLTS:------------------------ Material Licensing Tracking System NPL Lien:____________________ NPL Liens
Ca. BEP:_____________________ CA Bond Exp. Plan
ROD:------------------------- ROD
CONSENT____________________ Superfund ( CERCLA) Consent Decrees Ca. WDS:-------------------- CA WDS
S Bay Reg. 2:________________ South Bay Region 2
Coal Gas:____________________ Former Manufactured gas ( Coal Gas) Sites.

Unmapped ( orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.

Search Results:

Search results for the subject property and the search radius, are listed below:

Subject Property:

The subject property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.

TC359034. 1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Surrounding Properties:

Elevations have been determined from the USGS 1 degree Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative ( not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. EDR' s definition of a site with an elevation equal to the subject property includes a tolerance of - 10 feet. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the subject property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the subject property ( by more than 10 feet). Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed.

Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.

CAL - SITES: Formerly known as ASPIS, this database contains both known and potential hazardous substance sites. The source is the California Department of Toxic Substance Control.

A review of the Cal -Sites list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 Cal -Sites site within approximately 1 mile of the subject property.

Equal/ Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page
KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEM CORP 23333 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/ 2 - 1 W 19 34 NOTIFY 65: Notify 65 records contain facility notifications about any release that could impact drinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board' s Proposition 65 database.

A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1 mile of the subject property.

Equal/ Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page
ARCO SERVICE STATION # 6182 10121 NORTH FOOTHILL BO 1/ 4 - 1/ 2W 11 22 CORTESE: This database identifies public drinking water wells with detectable levels of contamination, hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action, sites with known toxic material identified through the abandoned site assessment program, sites with LISTS having a reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The source is the California Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Emergency Information.

A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 Cortese sites within approximately 1 mile of the subject property.

Equal/ Higher Elevation

KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEM CORP
Lower Elevation

MEASUREX ANNEX
Address
23333 STEVENS CREEK BLV
Address
10120 IMPERIAL AVE
Dist / Dir Map ID Page
112- 1 W 19 34
Dist / Dir Map ID Page
1/ 4 - 112ESE F16 31
TC359034. 1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally - defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity.

A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/ 01/ 1998 has revealed that there is 1 CORRACTS site within approximately 1 mile of the subject property.

Lower Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page
ZILOG INC 10460 BUBB RD 1/ 2 - 1 ESE 18 33
LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System.

A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/ 31/ 1999 has revealed that there are 11 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the subject property.

Equal/ Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page
FACCIOLA RESIDENCE 22371 CUPERTINO RD 1/ 8 - 1/ 4 W A2 9 DENNIS HALL PROPERTY 10104 BYRNE AVE 1/ 8 - 1/ 4 ESE B4 13 DENNIS HALL PROPERTY 10104 BYRNE AVE 1/ 8 - 1/ 4 ESE B5 15 MOBIL SERVICE STATION 22510 STEVENS CREEK BL, 1/ 4 - 1/ 2W 8 16 ARCO 10121 N FOOTHILL BLVD 1/ 4 - 1/ 2W D9 19
ARCO # 6182 10121 N FOOTHILL BLVD 1/ 4 - 1/ 2W D10 22
Lower Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page
U. S. POSTAL SERVICE 21701 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/ 4 - 1/ 2 E E12 23 US POSTAL SERVICE 21701 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/ 4 - 1/ 2E E13 23 HIGDON, ALLEY, KOLB 10070 IMPERIAL AVENUE 1/ 4 - 1/ 2E 14 27 MEASUREZ CORPORATION 10120 IMPERIAL AVE 1/ 4 - 1/ 2 ESE F15 30 MEASUREX CORPORATION 10120 IMPERIAL AVE 1/ 4 - 1/ 2 ESE F17 33 HAZNET: The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700, 000- 1,000, 000 annually, representing approximately 350, 000- 500, 000 shipments. Data from non - California manifests & continuation sheets are not included at the present time. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, & disposal method. The source is the Department of Toxic Substance Control is the agency A review of the HAZNET list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 HAZNET sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the subject property.

Equal/ Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page

DAN FACCIOLA

LYNN MARKEY
Lower Elevation
22371 CUPERTINO RD
10066 BYRNE AVE
Address
1/ 8 - 1/ 4W Al 9
1/ 8- 1/ 4 ESE 3 12
Dist / Dir Map ID Page
CLARKS AUTO PARTS & MACHINE 21881 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/ 8 - 1/ 4E C6 15 CLARKS AUTO PARTS & MACHINE 21881 STEVENS CREEK BLV 1/ 8 - 1/ 4E C7 15 TC359034. 1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CA SLIC: SLIC Region comes from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

A review of the CA SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 CA SLIC site within approximately 0. 5 miles of the subject property.

Lower Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page
US POSTAL SERVICE 21701 STEVENS CREEK BLV 114 - 112E E13 23 TC359034. 1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped:

Site Name

RANCHO SERVICE CENTER
TEXACO

DONEERVYN' S
ARCO SERVICE STATION # 495, AT 10550 DEANZA BLVD.,
ARCO STN # 495/ 10550 DEANZA BLVD

STEVENS CREEK( DUMPING LOCATION)
KAISER ALUMINU 23333 STEVENS

KAISER CEMENT CORP PERMANENTE
Database( s)
LUST
UST
HAZNET
ERNS
ERNS
ERNS
FINDS
S Bay Reg. 2,CA SLIC
TC359034. 1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - 359034. 1s - Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.

Major Roads
Contour Lines
Waterways
Earthquake Fault Lines
Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
Closest Federal Well in quadrant
Closest State Well in quadrant
Closest Public Water Supply Well
0 1/
2 1 2 Miles
Closest Hydrogeological Data
i Oil, gas or related wells
TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.

ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi CITY/ STATE/ ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY#: 359034. 1s LAT/ LONG: 37. 3226 / 122. 0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8: 41 am GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

SUMMARY

TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude ( North): 37. 322620 - 37° 19' 21. 4"
Longitude ( West): 122. 060852 - 122° 3' 39. 1"
Universal Transverse Mercator: Zone 10
UTM X ( Meters): 583210. 6
UTM Y ( Meters): 4130872. 0

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE
Target Property:

GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATIONt
Geologic Code:

Era:

System:

Series:

ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNITt
Category:

GROUNDWATER FLOW INFORMATION
2437122- C1 CUPERTINO, CA
Tpc
Cenozoic
Tertiary
Pliocene
Continental Deposits
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site- specific well data. if such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including well data collected on nearby properties, regional groundwater flow information ( from deep aquifers), or surface topography. t
AQUIFLOWr"**
Search Radius: 2. 000 Miles

DISTANCE DIRECTION

MAP ID FROM TP FROM TP
Not Reported

GENERAL DIRECTION

GROUNDWATER FLOW
General Topographic Gradient at Target Property: General NNE General Hydrogeologic Gradient at Target Property: No hydrogeologic data available.

Site - Specific Hydrogeological Data*:

Search Radius: 2. 0 miles
Status: Not found

FEDERAL DATABASE WELL INFORMATION

WELL DISTANCE

QUADRANT FROM TP
Northern > 2 Miles

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION

WELL DISTANCE

QUADRANT FROM TP
Northern 1/ 2 - 1 Mile
Eastern 1 - 2 Miles
Southern 1/ 4 - 1/ 2 Mile.

Western 1 - 2 Miles

STATE OIL/ GAS WELL INFORMATION
API # DISTANCE

FROM TP

LITHOLOGY
Not Reported

DEPTH TO

WATER TABLE
Not Reported

NO WELLS FOUND
t Source:

G. Schrubem,
R.

E. Amdt and W. J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous
U.

S. at
1:
2, 500, 000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.

B. King and
H.

M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 ( 1994).

S. EPA Ground Water Handbook, Vol I: Ground Water and Contamination, Office of Research and development EPA/ 625/ 6- 90/ 016a, Chapter 4, page 78, September 1990.

EDR AOUIFLOWTv information System of hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow directions at specific locations. See the date pages at the end of this report for a complete description.

TC359034. 1s Page 3
GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

SUMMARY

PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
Searched by Nearest PWS.

NOTE: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.

PWS Name: CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 TORRE AVE
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
Location Relative to TP: 1 - 2 Miles East
PWS currently has or has had major violation( s): No

AREA RADON INFORMATION
EPA Radon Zone for SANTA CLARA County: 2
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/ L.

Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/ L and 4 pCi/ L.

Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/ L.

Zip Code: 95014
Number of sites tested: 3
Area Average Activity 4 pCi/ L 4- 20 pCi/ L 20 pCi/ L
Living Area - 1st Floor 0. 267 pCi/ L 100% 0% 0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported TC359034. 1s Page 4
OVERVIEW MAP - 359034. 1 s - Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.

Target Property
o
1 a 1n 1 Yves
1 Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Sites at elevations lower than Power transmission lines the target property Oil & Gas pipelines
A Coal Gasification Sites ( if requested)
77,71 100 -year flood zone
T-77 NationalPriorityListSites 500 - year flood zone
Landfill Sites
TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.

ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi CITY/ STATE/ ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY#: 359034. 1s LAT/ LONG: 37. 3226 / 122. 0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8: 39 am w • mow w www. w w _ _ _ ___ n m_ ffi__ I___
Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
Coal Gasification Sites ( if requested)
X Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
El LandfillSites
0 1/ 16 1113 114 Miles
Power transmission lines
d=
a Oil & Gas pipelines
0 100 -yearfloodzone
500 - year flood zone
TARGET PROPERTY: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CUSTOMER: Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.

ADDRESS: 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd. CONTACT: Andria Pomponi CITY/ STATE/ ZIP: Cupertino CA 95014 INQUIRY#: 359034. 1s LAT/ LONG: 37. 3226 / 122. 0609 DATE: April 15, 1999 8: 40 am GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1 ADDENDUM

FEDERAL DATABASE WELL INFORMATION

BASIC WELL DATA
Site ID:

Site Type:

Year Constructed:

Altitude:

Well Depth:

Depth to Water Table:

Date Measured:

LITHOLOGIC DATA
Not Reported

WATER LEVEL VARIABILITY
Water Level: 283. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 02/ 01/ 69
Water Level: 298. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 01/ 69
Water Level: 265. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 02/ 01/ 70
Water Level: 277. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 01/ 70
Water Level: 255. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 02/ 28/ 71
Water Level: 266. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 08/ 01/ 71
Water Level: 250. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 12/ 01/ 71
Water Level: 259. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 05/ 01/ 72
Water Level: 255. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 01/ 01/ 73
Water Level: 260. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 01! 73
Water Level: 218. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 05/ 01/ 74
Water Level: 198. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 12/ 30/ 74
Water Level: 194. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 01/ 75
Water Level: 216. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 01/ 76
Water Level: 214. 90 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 01/ 77
Water Level: 204. 10 ft.

Date Measured: 05/ 01/ 78
Water Level: 184. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 05/ 01/ 79
Water Level: 208. 30 ft.

Date Measured: 12/ 31/ 81
Water Level: 192. 90 ft.

Date Measured: 07/ 01/ 83
Well Closest to Target Property ( Northern Quadrant)
372130122042301 Distance from TP: 2 Miles
Single well, other than collector or Ranney type
280. 00 ft.

Not Reported County: Santa Clara
189. 00 ft. State: California
640. 00 ft. Topographic Setting: Valley flat
Not Reported Prim. Use of Site: Withdrawal of water
Not Reported Prim. Use of Water: Public supply
Water Level: 287. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 03/ 01/ 69
Water Level: 280. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 11/ 01/ 69
Water Level: 159. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 03/ 01/ 70
Water Level: 267. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 11/ 01/ 70
Water Level: 256. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 04/ 01/ 71
Water Level: 270. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 01/ 71
Water Level: 240. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 01/ 01/ 72
Water Level: 277. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 07/ 01/ 72
Water Level: 240. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 03/ 01/ 73
Water Level: 248. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 11/ 01/ 73
Water Level: 217. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 06/ 25/ 74
Water Level: 195. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 02/ 28/ 75
Water Level: 195. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 10/ 28/ 75
Water Level: 190. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 03/ 01/ 77
Water Level: 201. 10 ft.

Date Measured: 11/ 01/ 77
Water Level: 206. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 12/ 78
Water Level: 189. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 06/ 01/ 79
Water Level: 202. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 10/ 01/ 82
Water Level: 165. 02 ft.

Date Measured: 01/ 01/ 84
Water Level: 290. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 05/ 01/ 69
Water Level: 274. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 12/ 01/ 69
Water Level: 269. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 05/ 01/ 70
Water Level: 254. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 12/ 31/ 70
Water Level: 254. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 05/ 01/ 71
Water Level: 267. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 10/ 01/ 71
Water Level: 241. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 02/ 01/ 72
Water Level: 279. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 01/ 72
Water Level: 266. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 05/ 01/ 73
Water Level: 133. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 01/ 02/ 74
Water Level: 216. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 01/ 74
Water Level: 195. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 04/ 30/ 75
Water Level: 184. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 12/ 28/ 75
Water Level: 190. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 05/ 01/ 77
Water Level: 194. 90 ft.

Date Measured: 01/ 01/ 78
Water Level: 208. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 11/ 01/ 78
Water Level: 212. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 01/ 79
Water Level: 183. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 12/ 29/ 82
Water Level: 303. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 07/ 01/ 69
Water Level: 268. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 01/ 01/ 70
Water Level: 275. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 07/ 01/ 70
Water Level: 250. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 02/ 01/ 71
Water Level: 255. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 06/ 01/ 71
Water Level: 260. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 11/ 01/ 71
Water Level: 241. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 03/ 01/ 72
Water Level: 258. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 10/ 31/ 72
Water Level: 270. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 07/ 01/ 73
Water Level: 131. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 03/ 01/ 74
Water Level: 214. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 11/ 01/ 74
Water Level: 214. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 06/ 30/ 75
Water Level: 179. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 03/ 01/ 76
Water Level: 189. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 06/ 01/ 77
Water Level: 193. 90 ft.

Date Measured: 03/ 01/ 78
Water Level: 186. 00 ft.

Date Measured: 03/ 01/ 79
Water Level: 240. 10 ft.

Date Measured: 09/ 01/ 81
Water Level: 175. 90 ft.

Date Measured: 05/ 01/ 83
TC359034. 1s Page Al
Water Wells:

GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
Well Within 1/2 - 1 Mile of Target Property ( Northern Quadrant) Water System Information:

Prime Station Code: E43/ 018- SCVWDMA
FRDS Number Number: 4310018005
District Number: 05
Water Type: Surface Water
Source Lat/ Long: 371945. 0 1220324. 8
Source Name: SCVWD - MANN CONNECTION
System Number: 4310018
System Name: City of Cupertino
Organization That Operates System:

Precision:
10300 TORRE AVE
Source Name:

CUPERTINO, CA 95014
Pop Served: 18200
Area Served: CUPERTINO
Water System Information:

User ID: HEN
County: Santa Clara
Station Type: RESVR/ CANAUAMBNT/ MUN/ INTAKE
Well Status: Combined Treated
Precision: 1, 000 Feet ( 10 Seconds)
Connections: 4199
Well Within 1 - 2 Miles of Target Property ( Eastern Quadrant) Prime Station Code: 07S/ 02W- 13C01 M User ID: HEN
FRDS Number Number: 431 0001 01 5 County: Santa Clara
District Number: 05 Station Type: WELL/ AMBNT/ MU N/ INTAKE/ SU P PLY Water Type: Well/ Groundwater Well Status: Active Untreated Source Lat/ Long: 372000. 0 1220200. 0 Precision: Undefined Source Name: WELL 024- 01
System Number: 4310001
System Name: CWSC Los Altos Suburban
Organization That Operates System:
949 B Street
Los Altos, CA 94024
Pop Served: 53940 Connections: 17895
Area Served: LOS ALTOS
Sample Information: * Only Findings Above Detection Level Are Listed Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 18. 000 C
Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 680. 000 UMHO
Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 7. 310
Chemical: PH ( LABORATORY)
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 247. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 300. 000 MG/ L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 400 MG/ L
Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 140 UG/ L
Chemical: PHOSPHATE
TC359034. 1s Page A2
GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 280. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 72. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CALCIUM
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 24. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: MAGNESIUM
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 28. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SODIUM
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 720
Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 1. 300 MG/ L
Chemical: POTASSIUM
Sample Collected: 12/30/ 1980 Findings: 33. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CHLORIDE
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 28. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SILICA
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 6. 000 UG/ L
Chemical: LITHIUM
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 020 UG/ L
Chemical: FOAMING AGENTS ( MBAS)
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 383. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 120
Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP.

Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 20. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: NITRATE ( AS NO3)
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 005 UG/ L
Chemical: IODIDE
Sample Collected: 12/ 30/ 1980 Findings: 060 NTU
Chemical: TURBIDITY ( LAB)
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 20. 000 C
Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 660. 000 UMHO
Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 7. 410
Chemical: PH ( LABORATORY)
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 249. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 303. 000 MG/ L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 500 MG/ L
Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 190 UG/ L
Chemical: PHOSPHATE
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 264. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS ( AS CAC03)
TC359034. 1s Page A3
GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 55. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CALCIUM
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 31. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: MAGNESIUM
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 36. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SODIUM
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 960
Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 900 MG/ L
Chemical: POTASSIUM
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 29. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CHLORIDE
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 160 MG/ L
Chemical: FLUORIDE ( TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT)
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 39. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SILICA
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 160. 000 UG/ L Chemical: BARIUM
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 10. 000 UG/ L
Chemical: LITHIUM
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 387. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 140
Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP.

Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 15. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: NITRATE ( AS NO3)
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 017 UG/ L
Chemical: IODIDE
Sample Collected: 10/ 13/ 1982 Findings: 150 NTU
Chemical: TURBIDITY ( LAB)
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 20. 000 C
Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 2. 000 UNITS
Chemical: COLOR
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 640. 000 UMHO
Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 7. 300
Chemical: PH ( LABORATORY)
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 257. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 312. 000 MG/ L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 400 MG/ L
Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 190 UG/ L
Chemical: PHOSPHATE
TC359034. 1s Page A4
GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 262. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 57. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CALCIUM
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 29. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: MAGNESIUM
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 42. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SODIUM
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 1. 130
Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 1. 100 MG/ L
Chemical: POTASSIUM
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 32. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CHLORIDE
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 180 MG/ L
Chemical: FLUORIDE ( TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT)
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 26. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SILICA
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 388. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 060
Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP.

Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 14. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: NITRATE ( AS NO3)
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 016 UG/ L
Chemical: IODIDE
Sample Collected: 08/ 15/ 1984 Findings: 300 NTU
Chemical: TURBIDITY ( LAB)
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 18. 000 C
Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 3. 000 UNITS
Chemical: COLOR
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 670. 000 UMHO
Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 7. 450
Chemical: PH ( LABORATORY)
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 265.000 MG/ L
Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 322. 000 MG/ L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 600 MG/ L
Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 170 UG/ L
Chemical: PHOSPHATE
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 263. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS ( AS CAC03)
TC359034. 1s Page A5
GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 60. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CALCIUM
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 27. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: MAGNESIUM
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 43. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SODIUM
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 1. 150
Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 1. 100 MG/ L
Chemical: POTASSIUM
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 39. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CHLORIDE
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 190 MG/ L
Chemical: FLUORIDE ( TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT)
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 32. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SILICA
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 411. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 250
Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP.

Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 16. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: NITRATE ( AS NO3)
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 018 UG/ L
Chemical: IODIDE
Sample Collected: 11/ 19/ 1986 Findings: 100 NTU
Chemical: TURBIDITY ( LAB)
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 18. 000 C
Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 1. 000 UNITS
Chemical: COLOR
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 670. 000 UMHO
Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 7. 450
Chemical: PH ( LABORATORY)
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 237. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 288. 000 MG/ L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 600 MG/ L
Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 140 UG/ L
Chemical: PHOSPHATE
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 277.000 MG/ L
Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 64. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CALCIUM
TC359034. 1s Page A6
GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 28. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: MAGNESIUM
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 29. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SODIUM
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 760
Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 1. 100 MG/ L
Chemical: POTASSIUM
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 34. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CHLORIDE
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 170 MG/ L
Chemical: FLUORIDE ( TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT)
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 32. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SILICA
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 382. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 100
Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP.

Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 17. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: NITRATE ( AS NO3)
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 006 UG/ L
Chemical: IODIDE
Sample Collected: 06/ 02/ 1988 Findings: 150 NTU
Chemical: TURBIDITY ( LAB)
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 18. 000 C
Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 2. 000 UNITS
Chemical: COLOR
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 645.000 UMHO
Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 7. 510
Chemical: PH ( LABORATORY)
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 243. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 295. 000 MG/ L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 600 MG/ L
Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 220 UG/ L
Chemical: PHOSPHATE
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 260. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 59. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CALCIUM
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 25. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: MAGNESIUM
TC359034. 1s Page A7
GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 37. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SODIUM
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 1. 000
Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 1. 100 MG/ L
Chemical: POTASSIUM
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 34. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CHLORIDE
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 200 MG/ L
Chemical: FLUORIDE ( TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT)
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 34. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SILICA
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 120. 000 UG/ L Chemical: BARIUM
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 391. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 130
Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX Q SOURCE TEMP.

Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 17. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: NITRATE ( AS NO3)
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 007 UG/ L
Chemical: IODIDE
Sample Collected: 07/ 08/ 1991 Findings: 300 NTU
Chemical: TURBIDITY ( LAB)
Sample Collected: 04/ 08/ 1992 Findings: 2. 500 PCI/ L
Chemical: GROSS ALPHA
Sample Collected: 04/ 08/ 1992 Findings: 1. 300 PCI/ L
Chemical: GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERROR
Sample Collected: 03/ 22/ 1993 Findings: 7. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: NITRATE ( AS NO3)
Sample Collected: 06/ 30/ 1994 Findings: 2. 600 PCI/ L
Chemical: GROSS ALPHA
Sample Collected: 06/ 30/ 1994 Findings: 1. 700 PCI/ L
Chemical: GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERROR
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 20. 000 C
Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 4. 000 UNITS
Chemical: COLOR
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 656. 000 UMHO
Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 7. 640
Chemical: PH ( LABORATORY)
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 248. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 300. 000 MG/ L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY
TC359034. 1s Page A8
GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 900 MG/ L
Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 210 UG/ L
Chemical: PHOSPHATE
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 254. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 57. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CALCIUM
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 26. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: MAGNESIUM
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 46. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SODIUM
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 1. 260
Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 1. 400 MG/ L
Chemical: POTASSIUM
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 40. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CHLORIDE
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 230 MG/ L
Chemical: FLUORIDE ( TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT)
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 32. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SILICA
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 134. 000 UG/ L Chemical: BARIUM
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 404. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 280
Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP.

Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 16. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: NITRATE ( AS NO3)
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 021 UG/ L
Chemical: IODIDE
Sample Collected: 10/ 27/ 1994 Findings: 150 NTU
Chemical: TURBIDITY ( LAB)
Sample Collected: 01/ 20/ 1995 Findings: 3. 400 PCI/ L
Chemical: GROSS ALPHA
Sample Collected: 01/ 20/ 1995 Findings: 2. 000 PCI/ L
Chemical: GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERROR
Sample Collected: 03/ 07/ 1995 Findings: 17. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: NITRATE ( AS NO3)
Sample Collected: 03/ 26/ 1996 Findings: 14. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: NITRATE ( AS NO3)
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 18. 000 C
Chemical: SOURCE TEMPERATURE C
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 5. 000 UNITS
Chemical: COLOR
TC359034. 1s Page A9
GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 567. 000 UMHO
Chemical: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 7. 480
Chemical: PH ( LABORATORY)
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 236. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL ALKALINITY ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 287. 000 MG/ L Chemical: BICARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 600 MG/ L
Chemical: CARBONATE ALKALINITY
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 100 UG/ L
Chemical: PHOSPHATE
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 282. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL HARDNESS ( AS CAC03)
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 64. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CALCIUM
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 27. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: MAGNESIUM
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 31. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SODIUM
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 31. 000
Chemical: SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 1. 600 MG/ L
Chemical: POTASSIUM
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 41. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: CHLORIDE
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 130 MG/ L
Chemical: FLUORIDE ( TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT)
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 28. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: SILICA
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 150. 000 UG/ L Chemical: IRON
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 12. 000 UG/ L
Chemical: NICKEL
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 56. 000 UG/ L
Chemical: ALUMINUM
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 382. 000 MG/ L Chemical: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 129
Chemical: LANGELIER INDEX @ SOURCE TEMP.

Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 14. 000 MG/ L
Chemical: NITRATE ( AS NO3)
Sample Collected: 11/ 10/ 1997 Findings: 600 NTU
Chemical: TURBIDITY ( LAB)
TC359034. 1s Page A10
GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
Well Within 1/4 - 1/2 Mile of Target Property ( Southern Quadrant) Water System Information:

Prime Station Code: 07S/ 02W- 15R01 M User ID: 43C
FRDS Number Number: 4300751001 County: Santa Clara
District Number: 73 Station Type: WELL/ AMBNT/ MUN/ INTAKE Water Type: Well/ Groundwater Well Status: Active Untreated Source Lat/ Long: 371905. 0 1220319. 0 Precision: 1, 000 Feet ( 10 Seconds) Source Name: WELL 01
System Number:

System Number: 4300751
System Name:

System Name: BLACKBERRY FARMS
Organization That Operates System:

Organization That Operates System:
298 GARDEN HILL DR.
21975 SAN FERNANDO AVE.

LOS GATOS, CA 95030
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
Pop Served:

Pop Served: 3600 Connections: 1
Area Served: Not Reported
Sample Information: * Only Findings Above Detection Level Are Listed Sample Collected: 09/ 25/ 1986 Findings: 1. 600 UG/ L
Chemical: CHLOROFORM ( THM)
Sample Collected: 10/ 24/ 1986 Findings: 760 UG/ L
Chemical: CHLOROFORM ( THM)
Sample Collected: 04/ 06/ 1987 Findings: 850 UG/ L
Chemical: CHLOROFORM ( THM)
Well Within 1 - 2 Miles of Target Property (Western Quadrant) Water System Information:

Prime Station Code: 07S/ 02W- 09Q11 M User ID: HEN
FRDS Number Number: 4300812001 County: Santa Clara
District Number: 05 Station Type: WELL/ AMBNT/ MUN/ INTAKE Water Type: Well/ Groundwater Well Status: Active Untreated Source Lat/ Long: 371954. 0 1220506. 0 Precision: 1, 000 Feet ( 10 Seconds) Source Name: WELL 01
System Number: 4300812
System Name: SCC P& R, Rancho San Antonio
Organization That Operates System:
298 GARDEN HILL DR.

LOS GATOS, CA 95030
Pop Served: 40 Connections: 1
Area Served: RANCHO SAN ANTONIO COUNTY PARK
TC359034. 1s Page A11
GEOCHECK VERSION 2. 1

PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
Searched by Nearest PWS
PWS SUMMARY:

PWS ID: CA4310018 PWS Status: Active Distance from TP: 1 - 2 Miles Date Initiated: June / 1977 Date Deactivated: Not Reported Dir relative to TP: East PWS Name: CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 TORRE AVE
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
Addressee / Facility: Not Reported
Facility Latitude: 371923 Facility Longitude: 122 01 51 City Served: CUPERTINO
Treatment Class: Mixed ( treated and untreated) Population Served: 10, 001 - 50, 000 Persons PWS currently has or has had major violation( s): No
TC359034. 1s Page Al2
Appendix D
Environmental Agency Information
Requested and Obatined
CDMCampDresser & McKee Inc.
consuRing One Walnut Creek Center
engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300
construction Walnut Creek, California 94596
operations
Tel: 925 933- 2900 Fax: 925 933- 4174
April 16, 1999
Ms. Teresa Lee
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Public Information
939 Ellis Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request
Dear Ms. Lee:

Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. ( CDM) is requesting information regarding any air emission complaints or permits on file with your agency for the property at 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA.

Your earliest response to this request is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at ( 925) 296- 8064.

Very truly yours,
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.

OC D
Andria Pomponi
Staff Planner
O:\ US ERS\ POM P.QNI\ CUPERT— I \ FOIA. W PD
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
939 Ellis Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Attention: Public Records
Administration Division
FAx. ( 415) 749- 5911
California Public Records Act Request
Name of Company Requesting Records: Date:

C - N r r _- in
Address .

L r L - ti- r . ve . .

Y e C i n 1u- ( 4V5/ Zhuodd
Who shoa! d we call if we have a question?
Qts
Contact: PoN[ , b
Telephone: ci
Please complete one copy of the back of this form for each facility or site for which you are requesting records, and mail or fax to the address shown above. Within 10 calendar days of receiving your request, we will fill your request, or you will be advised of the reason we are unable to fill it. If you have questions, please call ( 415) 749- 4784 for record request assistance.

The following are not considered public records:

Any trade secret so designated by a permitted facility.

Any complainant' s name or address.

Any record pertaining to personnel names or fiscal files subject to audit.

District publications or subscriptions available by fee ( including selected computer compilation printouts, as listed on " Record Request Form" and provided only as public information).

Any non- specific record ( i. e., requested without facility name or other identification).

REPLY TO YOUR PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST
Enclosed are the records you requested.

We havelocatedthe recordsyou requestedandthey exceedthe numberof pageswhichthe District provides at no charge. The cost is $ for pages at $ 0. 10 per page. The records will be forwarded upon receipt of the amount due. Please make your check or money order payable to BAAQMD. Your check should reference Invoice Number and should be sent to:

Business Office
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
939 Ellis Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
q We are unable to provide the records you requested.

S & ck ire ; s
x]' A search was made but no records were found. I a c situ z ns Cc e2 -+L r itio CA( ]
A search was made but the requested item is not ava"[ a& e becau6e it is not a public record.

We are unable to find the record you requested because the request did not include sufficient information to find it.

G: IRDWIPRAI. doc -- 11/ 26/ 96
CDMCampDresser & McKee Inc.
consulting One Walnut Creek Center
l
engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300
construction
Walnut Creek, California 94596
operations Tel: 925 933- 2900 Fax: 925 933- 4174
April 20, 1999
Will Bruhns
Public Assistance Officer
CaliforniaRegionalWaterQualityControlBoard
San Francisco Bay Region
1515 Clay Street, # 1400
Oakland, California 94612
Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request
Dear Mr. Bruhns:

Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. ( CDM) is requesting informationregardinganypermitsornoticesof violationonfile withyouragencyforthesiteslisted below. CDM authorizestheassessmentof feesup to $25for this request.

Mobile Service Station Zilog Inc.
22510 Stevens Creek Boulevard 10460 Bubb Road
Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014
Kaiser Alumninum & Chemical
23333 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Cupertino, CA_
22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Cupertino, CA 95014
Kaiser Cement Corp.
24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Cupertino, CA
Yourearliestresponsetothisrequestisappreciated. If youhaveanyquestionsregardingthismatter, please call me at ( 925) 296- 8064.

Very truly yours,
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
ax4u °
Andria Pomponi
Staff Planner
O:\ USERS\ POM PONI\ CUPERT- I \ FOIA. W PD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA— HEALTH AND WELFARE AGENCY
GEORGEDEUKME)IAN, Govemor

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
2151 BERKELEY WAY
BERKELEY, CA 94704
April 8, CAUFORN1AREGjoNA1WATFR
APR13
Mr. Phil Bobel, Chief
QUALM CONTROLBOARDWaste Management Section
US EPA Region IX
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94132
Dear Mr. Bobel:

This letter is to request your concurrence with this Department' s intention to issue a public notice and accept public comment regarding closure of the Zilog, Inc. facility which was located at 10640 Bubb Road, Cupertino, California. The Department has determined that the Zilog facility was closed in a manner consistent with Title 22, California Administrative Code, and that said closure was certified by the facility operator and an engineer duly registered to practice in the State of California.

Based on information available at this time, the Department of Health has further determined that no contamination resultingfrom Zilog' s activities remains at the site. There are, however, small concentrations of residual contaminants of uncertain originin the soil.

The Department therefore is proposing to permit closure of the Zilcg facility, with no requirement for Zilog to pursue additional closure or post closure activities at this time.

Your attention to this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Daniel E. Murphy at ( 415) 540- 2043.

Since- ly,
Dwi ht R Hoenig, Chief
North Coast California Section
Toxic Substances Control Division
cc: Roger James, RWQCB- SF
Debbie Johnson, EPA
DRH: dem: na
iTATE OF CALIFORNIA— HEALTH AND WELFARE AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Gov, mor

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES

TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL DIVISION
2151 BERKELEY WAY, ANNEX 7
BERKELEY, CA 94704

CERTIFIED MAIL
Mr. Pirooz Lahij i
Director of Facilities
Zilog Corporation
210 Hacienda Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Dear Mr. Lahiji:

October 13, 1988

ALIFORNIAREGIONALWATER
OCT 18

QUALITY CONTROLBOARD
ZILOG FACILITY, 10640 BUBB ROAD, CUPERTINO, EPA ID NO.

CAD 076314459
We have received the engineer' s certification that your facility has been closed in accordance with your approved closure plan.

This letter is your acknowledgement that the Department now considers the Zilog hazardous waste storage facility, EPA ID No.

CAD 076314459 officially closed.

Please beadvised that this acknowledgement of facility closure is not a certification that your facility does not pose any environmental - or public health threat. This letter does not remove any liabilities associated with the past hazardous waste management practices which occurred on the site.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact Daniel E.

Murphy at ( 415) 540- 3545.

Sincerely,
DwiAt. / Hoenig, Chi
Region 2
Toxic Substances Control Division
Cert. Mail No. P 888 746 057
cc: Christy Camp, U. S. EPA - Region IX
Steve Ritchie, SF Bay- RWQCB
DRH: DEM: re
CDMCampDresser & McKee Inc.
consulting One Walnut Creek Center
engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300
construction Walnut Creek, California 94596
operationsTel: 925933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174
April 20, 1999
Jeanette Townsend
SantaClaraValley WaterDistrict
5750AlmadenExpressway
San Jose, CA 95118
Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request
Dear Ms. Townsend:

Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. ( CDM) is requesting informationregardinganypermitsornoticesofviolationthathavebeenissuedbyyouragencyforthe followingsites. CDMauthorizestheassessmentoffeesupto $25forthisrequest.

Kaiser Cement Corporation 22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard 24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014
Cupertino, CA 95014
Yourearliestresponsetothisrequestisappreciated. Ifyouhaveanyquestionsregardine, thismatter, please call me at ( 925) 296- 8064.

Very truly yours,
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
a
Andria Pomponi
Staff Planner
STATE OF CALIFORNIA lofts

CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
PE - E vrI: SGN

SANFRANCISCOBAY REGION
2101 WEBSTER STREET Suite Soo i
OAKLAND CA 94612
Tel. 15101286.1255
FAx 15101286. 1361)
December 21. 1995
File No. 2188. 20 (JRW10H.)
Mr. Phil Gaynor
tic , C RB File No 43- 1860
Kaiser Cement Corporation
24001 Stevens Creek Boulevard '
Cupertino, CA 95014
I
i
Subject:

RemedialActionCompletionCertificatefor24001StevensCreekBoulevard. Cupertino, CA Dear Mr. Gaynor.

Thisletterconfirmsthecompletionofsiteinvestigationandremedialactionfortheunderground storagetanksformerlylocatedatthelocationdescribedabove. EnclosedIstheCaseClosureSummaryfor the referencedsite for your records.

Basedupontheavailableinformation, includingthecurrentlanduse. andwiththeprovisionthattheinformationprovidedtothisagencywasaccurateandrepresentativeofsiteconditions. nofurtheraction related to the underground tank release is required ThisnoticeisissuedpursuanttoaregulationcontainedinTitle23. CaliforniaCodeofRegulations. Division 3. Chapter 16, Section 2721( e).

If achangeinlanduseis proposed. theownermustpromptly notify this agency PleasecontactJohnWestat (510) 286-1247orLoganHansenat (510) 286-6733ifyouhaveanyquestions regarding this matter Attachment: CaseClosure Summary
cc w/ attch: James Crowley, SCVWD
Jim Blarney, SCCDEH
Sincerely,
Loretta K. Barsamian
Executive Officer
Z';
Stephen I. Morse
Chief, Toxics Division
i
r
SITE CLOSURE SUNLMARY ^
I. AGENCY INFORMATION Date De. emhcr 21. 149s
AFencs lame S F B R W Q C B . Address 2101 Webster Street City State Zip Oakland- CA 94612 PMmc 1510) 286. 1255
Responsible Staff Person John R West. U, gan Hansen Title Ensironmenul Specialist III Student Intern Il. SITE LN -FORMATION
Site Facihn Name Kaiser Cement Corporation. Scrvi; c Sution Site Facility Address 24MI Stevens Creek Boulevard. Cuperiino. CA 95013 RB SMS Case No 33- 1660 Lucal or LOP Cax No Pnpnn 1132
I
URF Filing Date 2' 22 9.1 SWEEPS No
Responsihle Partie, nncludc addre, ws and Phone numbers- Phil Gaynor Kaiser Cement Corparauon 23001 Snscns Creek Bpuleyard. Cu rnn,. CA 95111. I Ph. ( 408) 996- 4266
Tank No. Size in Gallons Contents Closed In— Place' Removed'. I Date 1 10. 000 Diesel Rcmoscd I
11 ID 9-
I

10. 0110 Gasuhnc Removed
IO. O(K) Gau+ hne Remosed I! Ib 91
111_ RELEASE AND SITE CHARACTERIZATION INTORSIATION
Cau, e and Tspe of Release Unknown
Site characterization complete' Yes Date Approved By Oyersi ht Aeencc Monitoring wrils installed' No Number Proper crecned mmnal' Highest GW Depth Below Ground Surface. Lowest Depth Flow Direction cost Sensitive Current Use.

Most Sensitive Potential Use
and Probabiliry of Use
Are drinking water wcl!, affected' Aquifer lame
Is surface water affected' Nearest Affected SW Name
Off - Site Bcnefi: ial Use Impacts ( Addresses Locations)' Reponisi on file' 1' es Where is rerKlrtm filed' S FR W Q C B r-
nrr, Y wr.,
1 IV. CLOSURE
Due,
e0m ICiCJ ; arrnusc anon Protea evsane
henclmal uses per the
Rcemnal Hoard Ba, m Plan' Y.,
Dues compicicJ : orre, u, c
a,
tion protea potential
heneli, ial u, e, r, the Rerwnai h— rJ
Ha, m Pl. ir.' 1
e
Does curretuse action prvtcct puhhi health for current land usc' Yc, II I
Site Manaeenient RegwrcmcnL No s ectal re uirement% I
Monitoring Wells De, ommss) oned
N A \ umber Decummi%, wned
ur.. hcr Rct., incd
List Enforcement Acnnns Taken None taken
List Enforcement Axiom Rescinded None rcxmdc l
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF . AFFECTED MATERIA!.

Material Amount ( Include Units) Action ( Treatment or Disposal — Destination) j
Date
Tank 1 10.( Xt0 Callon Removed and di% posed ( Iucatton unkn,, wm I
I I v,
Tank '_ 10. 0kW) calion Remoscd and disfx, wd dc>` auun unknowm l
l IS"
Tank i IU.( XV Callan Remmed and ds ) scd ( location uni: now- n) j
11 Ih tai
Piping Unknown Removed and dispsiscd docauon unknowm 11 Ih 9i I
ki. AXI%IU%l DO'' CMENTED POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS— B[ FORE AND AFTER CLLANI' P POLLl7A.\ 7
Soil ( ppm)
Before Atter
Nater ( ppb) Soil ( ppm)
POLLIT.\ 7
Before After Before After
t
Nater ( phi
i
Before After
TPH ) Gas) 22 NA' N A• N A Xsl= u' NAcnr N A N A i
TPH iDinelr U V \ A \ A EN\ Ihcntrne NA
I
N
Bctucnr 5'
N
A N A N A 0) I S Grca, c N\ NA
j
N
Toluene h' NA N A N A Hca, s sicuis NA NA N A i I
Comments ( Depth of Remediation- etc.):
am Ie taken from , io: kpilc of o, creicasated sml tram tank Pit I ND= Nun- dctc. t \ A= A= Not aprI), ahlc
I
IV. CLOSURE
Due, e0m ICiCJ ; arrnusc anon Protea evsane henclmal uses per the Rcemnal Hoard Ba, m Plan' Y., Dues compicicJ : orre, u,
c
a, tion protea potential heneli, ial u, e, r, the Rerwnai h— rJ Ha, m Pl. ir.' 1 e
Does curretuse action prvtcct puhhi health for current land usc' Yc, II
I
Site Manaeenient RegwrcmcnL No s ectal re uirement% I
Monitoring
Wells De, ommss) oned N A \ umber Decummi%, wned ur.. hcr Rct., incd List Enforcement Acnnns Taken None taken
List Enforcement Axiom Rescinded None rcxmdc l
I
V. TECHNICAL REPORT CORRESPONDENCE ETC.. MAT Tiffs L. , SURE RECO% INIENDATION

AAS BASED L'PON
Title:

Sampling Repon, Sequoia Analytical 11 19 91
Uinuthorized Release Form ]'_' Ga
vI. ADDITIONAL CO\ OIENTS, DATA. ETC.

PLLASL IACLLDE ATTACH THE rot LOW DA AS APMOMIATL
I- SrI 4AP 1% O 41` 1w TA% A Mr UA AT" O% MO TMI. WELL LIX AT— D.

I,
I ADw 1711 LMAMt- T 17f ..

Sri r(. fu S wOATHN Ot MTIrt
L
G AIILA OF I SIDLA A) Lt:" H ; 1 r 11P. Ar
L DLI_ . 171, P. 1''
On Nosemher 19.1993. three IO.M1 Fallon Underground Stange Tanks IUSTsi. one used to hold diesel and twos used to hold gasoline were closed and removed from the subject site Nicole Jakahy, of the Sanu Clara County Envi,onmentalHealthDepartmentwaspresentto observeremovalandsamplingTwo, wnl sample, wereLakcn from heneath each CST pit and three composite samples of the stockpiled soils were Laken Anal\ srs of the samples taken from hencath the tanks resulted in a maximum conccintranon of one part(+" per million Ippm) for Total Petroleum H% drozatte, n% ITPNI The stockpile samples had a maximum lysyl of TPH at ]_ ppm Benzene.

Toluene. Ethylbenzene. and Xylene ( BTEX) concentrations were well below one ppm or not detected in all samples
Conclusion Regional Board Suit re.,, mmend the cxc lar closure sm:e only minor IcsclA o11TPN were klund : n the sod samples from the tank pit and residual podluwm , lac% not appear to posy a threat it, water qualm , or human health and safes
7 C'
f
fes-'
CO
2 ti
This document and the related CASE CLOSURE LETTER. shall he retained Is, the lead agen:y as pan oMe off": — _ sue file fV m
Jf^
v . r
h1 ®
1 r,
V 64Mp
Tye .
yy,'
Liry
HC
e
March 2, 1999
Mr. Earl Bouse
Hanson Peramente Cement
P. O. Box 309
3000 Busch Road
Pleasanton, CA 94566
Dear Mr. Bouse:

Subject. FuelLeak Investigation at Kaiser Cement, 24001StevensCreekBoulevard, Cupertino, CA PerourFebruary26, 1999, telephoneconversation, I amforwardingto youa copyof theSantaClara Valley Water District ( District' s) February 7, 1997, letter and additional information. The staff at CaliforniaRegionalWater Quality ControlBoard (RWQCB) closedtheportionof this casethatinvolves gasoline tanks ( Upper Service Station). The remaining source areasto be addressedare listed below and documented in our enclosed letter. Please prepare and submit a work plan to define the extent of contaminationin theLower ServiceStationandEmergencyGeneratorareas.

TECHNICAL COMMENTS

1. There are five former source areas at this site:

Lower Service Station
Emergency Generator
Garage
Oil House
Upper Service Station

2. Lower Service Station Area
Prepare a work plan to define the extent of soil and groundwater pollution associated with four removed 1, 000 gallon diesel tanks. Following tank removal, reportedly floating product was observedonwaterin thetankpit andexcavatedsoilscontainedstrongdieselfuel odors. Reportedly, no samples were collected from this area and the excavation was backfilled.

Emergency Generator Area
Define the extent of soil and groundwater pollution associated with one removed 4, 000 gallon diesel tank. Following tank removal, reportedly the tank appearedundamaged with no apparentleaks, but the associated connecting lines andplumbing showed obvious leakage. Excavated soils contained diesel odors and the excavation contained product. No samples were collected and the excavation was backfilled.

4. Garage and Oil House Areas
No further work is necessary.

Mr. Earl Bouse 2 March 2, 1999
Upper Service Station Area
No further work is necessary; The RWQCB granted closure for this area December 21, 1995.

However, if you areno long utilizing thegroundwatermonitoring wells installedin this area, you should properly abandon them. Contact Mr, Dave Zozaya in the District' s Well Services Unit, 408) 927-0710, extension2650. It appearsthatthreegroundwatermonitoringwells wereinstalled near the existing underground storage tanks.

6. Becauseclosurehasbeengrantedfortheonlygasolinetanksatyoursite, it isnotnecessarytorepeat theanalysesforfueloxygenatesinyournextinvestigation. However, it will benecessarytoanalyze soil and groundwater samples for the gasoline additive Methyl tert- Butyl Ether ( MTBE), and to reporttheanalyticalresultsinyourdatatables, aswell asincludethelaboratoryanalyticalresults for all samples analyzed If analytical results for samplesyield positive results under method 8020, we suggest you use confirmation analyses, with analytical method 8260 or comparable, to confirm the presence of MTBE at your site.

A typical way of defining the extent of contamination near and in former source areasis to install soil borings and to collect soil and groundwater samples for analysis, at depth intervals of 5 feet and atsignificantlithologicbreaks. In ordertodefinetheverticalextentof contamination, it isnecessary to collect samples until either: you reach groundwater and collect a grab groundwater sample for analysis, or obtain non-detectable analytical results for petroleum hydrocarbon contamination to a significant depth in the soil.

In orderto definethelateralextentof contamination, it is necessaryto install borings laterally from the source areasuntil analytical results for samples indicate significant contaminant attenuation with distance from the source area.

REQUEST
Prepare a work plan to address comments 1 and 2 above, due no later than April 16, 1999.

This request is made pursuant to the Regional Water Quality Control Board's authority under Section 13267 of the California Water Code.

If you have any questions, please call me at (408) 265- 2607, extension 2639.

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Adele R Shepherd
Water Quality Specialist
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Oversight Program
Enclosures
cc/ enc: A. Shepherd
cc: D. Zozaya
PT: gs: FL03 01 g
L
CDMCampDresser & McKee Inc.
consulting One Walnut Creek Center
engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300
construction
Walnut Creek, California 94596
operations Tel: 925 933- 2900 Fax: 925 933- 4174
April 20, 1999
Freedom of Information Act Contact
California Environmental Protection Agency
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 525
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request
Dear Freedom of Information Act Contact:

Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. ( CDM) is requesting informationregardinganypermitsor noticesof violationthathavebeenissuedby your agencyfor the sites listed below. CDM authorizes the assessmentof fees up to $25 for this request.

Facciolo Property Lynn Markey Property
22371 Cupertino Road 10066 Bryne Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014
Clark Auto Parts & Machine Measurex Annex
21881 Stevens Creek Boulevard 10120 Imperial Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014
22120 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Cupertino, CA 95014
Your earliest responseto this requestis appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at ( 925) 296- 8064.

Very truly yours,
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
amotuo
Andria Pomponi
Staff Planner
V
w.
u. 4
California Environmental Protection Agency m
Air Resources Board a Department of Pesticide Regulation • Department of Toxic Substances Control Integrated Waste Management Board • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Winston H. Hickoz State Water Resources Control Board a Regional Water Quality Control Boards Gray DavisSecretaryfor Governor nvironmental
rotection
April 28, 1999
Ms. Andria Pomponi
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.

One Walnut Avenue, Suite 300
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Re: Freedom of Information Act Request
Dear Ms. Pomponi:

We have received your letter requesting information datedApril 20, 1999, regarding "any permits or notices of violation that have been issued by your agency ..." as stated in your letter.

After reviewing the files of the Office of the Secretary, no records relevant to your requestwere discovered.

You may wish to contact one or more of our constituent entities regarding your request individually to determine if they have pertinent information. For your information, the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) consists of the following entities:

Office . of the Secretary ( to which your request was sent) Air Resources Board
Department of Pesticide Regulations
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Integrated Waste Management Board
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
State Water Resources Control Board
Regional Water Quality Control Boards
I have enclosed a list of contacts for public records requests at each Board, Department, and Office within Cal/ EPA. If you have any questions regarding the Office of the Secretary, please contact me at ( 916) 327- 2064.

Sincerely,
L19'
s F. Brown
Acting Deputy Secretary for Law
Enforcement and Counsel
Enclosure
555 Capitol Mall a Suite 525 a Sacramento, California 95814 0 ( 916) 445- 3846 a Fax: ( 916) 445- 6401 Printed on Recycled Paper
r_ CDMCampDresser & McKee Inc.
consulting One Walnut Creek Center
engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300
construction Walnut Creek, California 94596
operationsTel: 925933-2900 Fax: 925933-4174
April 16, 1999
Mr. Donald White
Freedom of Information Act Officer
United StatesEnvironmental Protection Agency - Region IX Office of Public Affairs
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request via fax: 415- 744- 1605 I Dear Mr. White:

Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) is requesting information in your files for the property at 22120 StevensCreek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA.

Your earliestresponseto this requestis appreciated. If youhaveanyquestionsregardingthis matter, please call me at ( 925) 296- 8064.

Very truly yours,
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.

Andria Pomponi
Staff Planner
0:\ USERS\ POM P.ONI\ C UPERT- I \ FOIA. W PD

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Z =

REGION IX
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105. 3901

OFFICE OF THE

REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR
Freedom of Information Act RIN- 9- / S - J /
Your Reference: / ,, 0 (_ r P l
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ( RCRA) - database lists those regulated facilities that have notified EPA as hazardous waste generators, transporters or treatment, storage or disposal facilities under RCRA. This database may not contain all the potential hazardous waste s tes that exist or that are regulated by state and local agencies. Your request also has been sent to other appropriate divisions of EPA, who will answer you directly.

The information you have requested is not in the EPA Region 9 RCRA L__-
1 database e_ or hardcopy files. If you consider this
response to be a denial, you may appeal it by addressing your written appeal to the Freedom of Information Officer ( A- 101), United States Environmental Agency, 401 M Street, S. W., Washington D. C. 20460.

California, Arizona and Nevada are
RCRA program in lieu of EPA and we
appropriate state agency to request
attached).

COMMENTS:
now authorized to conduct the
suggest that you contact the
up- to- date information ( list
If you have additional questions regarding your request, please contact Jacqueline Jennings, or Bridget Coyle, at ( 415) 744- 2029.

Si, 1aqerejy
BrVdgef jV( 5yl' X, Section Chief
FAX #: 415/ 744- 1605 Data M' gem
nt &
Analysis
I

1. Printed on Regrled Paper
CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc.
consulting One Walnut Creek Center
engineering 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300
construction
Walnut Creek, California 94596
operations Tel: 925 933-2900 Fax: 925 933-4174
April 30, 1999
Ron Baker
External Affairs
Department of Toxic SubstancesControl
10151 Croydon Way, Suite 3
Sacramento, CA 95827
Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request
Dear Mr. Baker:

Pursuant the Freedom of Information Act, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. ( CDM) is requesting informationregardinganypermitsornoticesofviolationthathavebeenissuedbyyouragencyforthe siteslistedbelow. CDMauthorizestheassessmentoffeesupto $25forthisrequest.

Facciolo Property Lynn Markey Property
22371 Cupertino Road 10066 Bryne Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014
Clark Auto Parts & Machine Measurex Annex
21881 Stevens Creek Boulevard 10120 Imperial Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014
Yourearliestresponsetothisrequestisappreciated. If youhaveanyquestionsregardingthismatter, please call me at (925) 296- 8064.

Very truly yours,
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.

Gf 0- ;
r7
Andria Pomponi
Staff Planner
O F F I C E 0 F' N I A
9 BOOK
357 9.

6. 62
2 za
NI
2 4r _`
S2
mI
5/
5 \
4 '
3 _
1p - j -/
00/ 2-
J
J
T O
N 23 m
3 2
6BK
G
27 60 28
emn
9 9 0
5425
Cn
Z Zo
5 55 25 75. 12
O a1
23 4
n
00 l
Qrn
56-
7 6,
2 JOK K 870 O. R. 1249
m
P
Q
a4
o
kz
o
Compiled in conformance with sec 327 of the
5 S
R. k T. code. For assessment purposes only.

E rNottve For Roy! Yec 19 9 8— 9 9
2 c`
LAWRENCE E. STONE —

ASSESSOR
A
T

6. 62
2 za
NI
2 4r _`
S2 mI
5/
5 \
4 '
3 _
1p -
j -/
00/ 2-
J
J
T O
N 23
m
3 2
6BK
G
27 60 28 emn
9 9 0
5425
Cn
Z
Zo
5 55 25

75. 12
O
a1
23 4
n 00
l
Qrn
56-
7 6,
2 JOK K 870 O. R. 1249
m
P
Q
a4
o
kz
o
Compiled in conformance with sec 327 of the
5 S
R. k T. code. For assessment purposes only.

E rNottve For Roy! Yec 19 9 8— 9 9
2 c` LAWRENCE E. STONE —

ASSESSOR
cl 3/ /9/14 L+eh * [

DEPARTMENT OF PAFIKS AND RECREATION

CITY HALL

CUPERTINO
10300TORREAVENUE-CUPEFITINO CA95014-3255
TELEPHONE:(408)777-3110-FAX: (408)777-3366

ST AFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. I F) MEETING DATE: April 2, 2009

SUBJECT
Reconunendation for future use of StocUmeir Pmperty BACKGROtJND
The Stocklmeir property was purchased by the City in 1999, consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan parks and open space element. The Stocklmeir House is of historic interest; Louis Stocklmeir WaS' One of the advocates of Cupertino ixicorporation and the founding father of the Cupeitino Historical Society. The 5.1-acre site includes one home, a converted garage and a 3-acre orcliard, predominantly planted in oranges. The home was rented until the septic tank failed approximately five years ago. The house is no longer habitable and would require extensive modification to open to the public. In 2006, the city spent $35,000 for preservation by re-roofing the house and performing mold mitigation work.

As part of the second phase of the approved Stevens Creek Corridor Plan, the creek is to be realigned along tlie Stocklmeir property. The proposed realignment would reduce erosion and undercutting of the existing east creek bank along the golf course. There is a sanitary sewer main runnii'+g along the golf course edge that needs to be protected. The Stevens Creek Trail is proposed through tl':ie Stocklmeir site, throrigli the orange orchard. The trail runs adjacent to the historic house and garden. This route will require enhancen':ient of the riparian yegetation to shade the creek and additional protection to screen the trail users from errant golf balls.

In 2004, Cupertino Historical Society requested a long-term lease of the Stocklmeir propeity for the Cupeitino Center for Living History. Their plari required millions of dollars in private investment, arid tO that end, Cupertino Historical Society needed tO pi-eSent potential dOnOrS witl'i all aSSuranCe that the City would allow the proposed history center to go forward, after the funds were raised, The City Council passed a Resolution of Intent agreeing to Iease the Stocklmeir property to the Cupertino Historical Society for a period of twenty (20) years with a IO-year extension at no cost, contingent upon cornpletion of a 3 to 5 year capital campaign to raise funds to renovate the facility, and upon presentation and approval by the City Council, of a management plan that would open the facility to the public.

Subsequent analysis has revealed significant site constraints to use of tlie property. Cupertino Historical Society board members have become aware of the expense involved in converting an old residential structure for public use. The Cupeitino Historical Society sent a letter in January 2008 to the City Council asking council to amend the resolution for t)!'ie lease of property for the Center for Living History to include new goals to be achieved through a City/Cupertino Histoiical Society partnersliip. The new goals were:
' A cooperatiye Cupertino Historical Society/City effoit to draft an intei'pretive plan for the Stocklmeir property
' A cooperative Cupertino Historical Society/City effort to raise funds for the use of improving the Stocklmeir propeity
a Support for City effoits to develop an historical orchard ori the Stocklmeir propeity, including iitigation, and funding for ai'i orcliardist to advise on managen'ient practices a Suppoit for City efforts to renovate aiid secure the Stocklmeir house for purpose of creating a walk-by historical exhibit
a Suppoit the City effoits to construct a multi-use trail through the Stocklmeir propeity and that it be tuilt as close as possible to the creek with a simple, narrow, unpaved footpath crossing tlie o-rchard.

ANALYSIS
The Cupertino Historical Society was willing to collaborate with the City to help tie the historical interpretation to the construction of the new trail and the renovation of the StocUmeir Property. In February 2009, Darryl Stow, a board n'iember of the Cupeitino IF-Tistorical Society, organized a meeting of potential stakeholders to explore the possibilities for a "working legacy faim" concept at the Stocklmeir Propeity. Members of this stakeholders group included representatives from the Cupertino Historical Society, Fremont Union High School District, Cupei-tino Rotary, and City of Cupertino.

This stakeholders group has developed a proposed vision for tlie possible fu(ure use of a working legacy farm at the Stockhneir Property. It was a priority of tl'ie group that the working legacy farm would be able to facilitate community connection and advance lifelong learning. The proposed vtsion ts:
):( Build a cornrnunity l'iub where existing resources can be nurtured and cultivated wliile celebrating our historical legacy. Create community partnersliips to build and sustain a living open space.

The group has developed proposed attributes to assist in guiding future community programming at tlie Stocktmeir Property. These proposed attributes are:
* Reconnect to nature in self-directed maxiner
* Building for better cornrnunity future
* Encourage community service
* Develop pride and respect in nil:ituring land and each other Outreaching to additional community partners is the next step for the stakeholders group. The following paitners have been identified for possible paitnership oppoitunities at the proposed working legacy farm:
- Neiglibors to the Stocklmeir Propeity
- Friends of the Stevens Creek Trail
Rolling Hills 4-H Club
Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society
Santa Clara Valley Water District
Retired Cupertino Faimers

RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending tliat the Parks and Recreation Commission suppoit the concept developed by tl'ie Stocklmeir Property Stakeholders Group of a working legacy farm that will build a community hub where existing resorirces can be nurtured and cultivated while celebrating our historical legacy, and create community paitnerships to build and sustain a living open space.

PREPARED BY: SUBMITTED BY:

Julia Lamy, Senior Recr44tion Supervisor A6rl4inder, D-irecfor Parks and Recreation From: Connie Cunningham
To: City Clerk
Subject: Fwd: 24-3-19 CC Agenda Item 8 Public Comments
Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 12:30:28 PM
Attachments: 24-3-19 CC Agenda Item 8 City Owned Property.docx CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello, would you mind changing the words “4 -apartment building in my enclosure to “4 - bedroom house”? My original words were an error, which is a significant error.

Thank you, Connie Cunningham
From Connie's iPhone
Begin forwarded message:

From: Connie Cunningham <[email protected]>
Date: March 19, 2024 at 8:42:37 PM PDT
To: City Clerk Cupertino <[email protected]>
Subject: 24-3-19 CC Agenda Item 8 Public Comments
24-3-19 CC Agenda Item 8 Public Comments
Please add my written comments, that I spoke verbally, to the record for this Council meeting.

Sincerely,
Connie Cunningham
1 24-3-19 City Council Agenda Item 8

Good evening Mayor Mohan, Vice Mayor Fruen,
Councilmembers, and City Manager:

I am Connie Cunningham, Chair, Housing Commission,
speaking for myself only.

Thank you, Assistant Manager Matt Morley for your
excellent report on this item.

Firstly: Agenda 8 tonight addresses the Stocklmeir
site as its main focus. I support only uses that are
consistent with a museum or nature since it is near the creek and in a flood zone.

Secondly: I am speaking tonight in support of Janet
Van Zoeren on behalf of the proposal of a 4-bedroom
Memory Care Home for IDD individuals at 10301 Byrne
Avenue. Long term lease of the land.

I highlight the statement in the Staff Report that
says:

Quote: *Should staff reach agreement with one of the
two parties interested in the property for
below-market housing, the agreement will return to the
Council for consideration.
2 Should no agreement be reached in this phase, staff
will propose selling the property with the use of a real estate agent at market value. Presenter: Matt Morley,
Assistant City Manager” end quote
I heard one speaker say that they should look for
another space. Where? Properties like this are rare.

Financial advisors usually advise to hold onto property.

It is the most valuable thing you have, and increases in value more than anything else you will have. That is
true of City land as well. I would say that it is
irresponsible to sell the City land and lose control over what the City wants to achieve for its residents.

Discussed in the earlier CIP session tonight:

Pages 3 & 4: The CIP Plan prioritizes
--Health and Safety.
-- Council Commissions and/or Community Priority
--Projects that have secured external funding.

Page 4 ends

been placed on projects that utilize non-General Fund
sources.

3 I note that:
1) This Byrne Avenue property has already been
purchased in 2017. The value is growing and will
continue to grow.
2) The applicant, BAHC, plans to provide funds to build the 4 apartments they propose. They will also pay a
lease amount for the property.
3) This is a project that furthers the he alth of people suffering dementia.

I look forward to seeing the Bay Area Housing
Corporation be awarded the use of this property.

Please remember Janet Van Zoeren’s presentation, and
the critical need that will be filled for vulnerable
people, as you consider your decision about the Byrne
Avenue property.

Thank you,
Connie Cunningham

4 Excerpt from the Staff Report below:
“*10301 Byrne Ave – The City acquired this property
in 2017, with the primary goal of
carving off some of the property for use as right-of-
way to enable the future construction
of bicycle and pedestrian access along San Fernando
Ave. This has been accomplished
and recorded with the County.

On July 6, 2023 the Council declared this property
surplus to the needs of the City. In
compliance with the California Surplus Lands Act, staff has offered the property for sale
as a below-market housing site. The prescribed process
is specific, requiring the City to negotiate in good faith for ninety days prior to looking for other interested
parties.

Should staff reach agreement with one of the two
parties interested in the property for
below-market housing, the agreement will return to the
Council for consideration.Should no agreement be
reached in this phase, staff will propose selling the
property with the use of a real estate agent at market
value. Presenter: Matt Morley, Assistant City Manager
CC 03-19-2024
Item #9
Councilmember
Reports
Written
Communications
From: Kitty Moore
To: City Clerk; Kirsten Squarcia; Lauren Sapudar
Subject: Moore Report Written Communications
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 3:34:28 PM
Attachments: March 19, 2024 Moore Report.pdf
Dear City Clerk,

Please include the attached for item 9.

Thank you,

Kitty Moore
Kitty Moore
Councilmember
City Council
[email protected]
(408) 777-1389

1 CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITY REPORT Meeting: March 19, 2024 Reporting Councilmember: Councilmember Kitty Moore Report Activity Dates: 2/23/24 to 3/19/24 Event Date, Title, and Description: February 23, 2024. First time attendee at the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce Lunar New Year Celebration. Met many our business community leaders including a water retailer where I learned about PFAS being measured in ppt (not ppm, or ppb) January 8, 2024-present. Begin Winter quarter Environmental Studies courses: Environmental Management Tools: Environmental Management Systems & Environmental Performance Reporting and Environmental Resource Mgmt & Pollution Prevention: Air, Water & Land. Self-funded. I have been studying the quality management-related ISO 14001 sustainability planning standards, air pollution controls, and water law and clean-up standards post Cuyahoga River fire and Clean Water Act of 1972. This is the start of my third year in Environmental Studies. Have reviewed the Cupertino GP, Sustainability elements, local Superfund sites, and been researching local PFAS. De Anza is recognized for their excellent Environmental Studies Program. March 5, 2024 City Council Meeting March 11, 2024. 2:1 Meeting with City Manager and City Attorney. March 11, 2024. Wrote city RE PFAS: PFOA and PFOS and online research results https://ca.water.usgs.gov/projects/gama/water-quality-results/

City Council Councilmember Activity Report
2 March 10. 2024. Attended League of Women Voters – Cupertino -Sunnyvale “Meet Electeds Mixer” with area electeds in a less formal setting to have a chance to chat. March 12, 2024. Attended the First Amendment Coalition FOIA training webinar to learn about Federal and State public records law regarding our rights to public records and how to improve public records requests. March 13, 2024. Attended San Francisco Baykeeper 2024 “State of the Bay” webinar. SF Baykeeper has been around 35 years. The Clean Water Act of 1972 helped the Bay but Nitrogen, Selenium, microplastics continue to harm the Bay. The Bay has a mix of fresh and salt water. SB Baykeeper is a watchdog. 5 oil refineries and 2 coal export hubs impact the Bay. Baykeeper opposes the Delta Tunnel water diversion proposal and dam proposals and holds polluters accountable. 1 foot of sea level rise is expected within the next ten years, and this may leach out toxins into the Bay and inland. March 14, 2024. Attended the Special Board Meeting of Santa Clara Valley Water, Censure hearing of one of their board members. It was interesting to watch the proceedings, meeting management, policy and procedure adherence, and outcome. March 14, 2024. Attended the Cities Association Legislation Action Committee as a visitor to hear about legislation from Assemblymember Low and Assemblymember Berman. Stayed for part of the Cities Association Board meeting to hear Tax Assessor Larry Stone and his staff speak about possessory interest which is impacting parklets and closed streets for private commercial use. March 15, 2024. Attended city CIP prep. Session. March 16, 2024. Attended Congressman Ro Khanna’s Town Hall event to hear community concerns. March 16, 2024. Attended APALI Celebration event. March 18, 2024. Attended City Manager 1:1 event with two guest students from Lynbrook High School who were learning about city government.

Cupertino City CouncilMarch 19, 2024

Cupertino City Council
March 19, 2024