Cities Index.
Written Communications (Uploaded 5/22/24

Cupertino City Council
May 21, 2024

Document
Written Communications (Uploaded 5/22/24
Meeting
May 21, 2024
Body
Cupertino City Council
Original file
4.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cupertino.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

CC 05-21-2024
Item #4
Ratifying Accounts
Payable for April 5, 12, 19,
and 26
Written
Communications
From: Rhoda Fry
To: City Clerk; City Council
Subject: Agenda Item #4 Accounts Payable 5/20/2024
Date: Sunday, May 19, 2024 4:50:00 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Agenda Item #4 Accounts Payable 5/20/2024
Questions Regarding Accounts Payable

1. What is: 192504036 02/01/2024 Business Class Internet - Mary, Stevens ck, Jan. 2024 $967.39

2. What is: 275450 04/03/2024 10291 Imperial Ave, LMAT 100%, 275450 $50,000.00

3. Justification for taking $900.93 from the BMR housing fund for conference fees? AlecV03082024 03/08/2024 Reimbursement for Housing CA Conference_03.06.24-

03.08.24 $900.93, there is another $9.95 transaction for SJ Mercury News and that doesn’t seem right to me either.

4. I was unable to find a contract in public records for FRSecure. Can you make sure that all contracts are posted under agreements?
39385 04/05/2024 Open Accounts Payable FRSecure LLC $10,437.50 Invoice Date Description Amount BD0004829 03/25/2024 Risk Assessment L2 2023 Final 50% Payment - Project Completed $10,437.50

5. Note – A/P is inconsistent wrt to child support / garnishment and I think that all names should be redacted

6. I see that we did legal advertising for the Teen Commission Vacancy here, WORLD JOURNAL SF LLC. Did we advertise elsewhere?

7. There are a number of businesses that do business with the City in Cupertino that do not have business licenses. Can you please check that they have business licenses before they are paid?
Thanks,
Rhoda Fry

Virus-free.www.avg.com
CC 05-21-2024
Item #7
FY 2024-25 projects proposed
to receive funding from the
Road Maintenance and
Rehabilitation Account
created by (SB) 1
Written Communications
From: Peggy Griffin
To: Jonathan Orozco, CPA
Cc: City Clerk; City Council; Chad Mosley
Subject: 2024-05-21 City Council Agenda ITEM7 - new SB1 account added to Monthly Treasurer"s Report Date: Sunday, May 19, 2024 1:44:18 PM
Attachments: image001.png
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

PLEASE INCLUDE THIS EMAIL AS PART OF WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE ABOVE MEETING AGENDA ITEM.

Dear Finance Manager Orozco,

On the City Council’s 5-21-2024 Agenda is Item #7 regarding SB1 Funds with special use/reporting requirements. Since these funds will go into a separate fund that needs to be accountable…

Q1: When will the Monthly Treasurer’s Reports have this account (270-85-821 440-437 Intergovernmental SB1) added to them as a separate line item? If not, why?

Q2: Are there other accounts that have or should be added to the Treasurer’s Report due to special reporting requirements for new funding sources?

Sincerely,
Peggy Griffin

From Page 3 of 3 of the Staff Report for Item #7

From: Peggy Griffin
To: Chad Mosley; City Council
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: 2024-05-21 City Council Meeting ITEM7 - SB1 Funds Project List for FY24-25 Date: Sunday, May 19, 2024 1:00:59 PM
Attachments: image001.png
image002.png
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

PLEASE INCLUDE THIS EMAIL AS PART OF WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE ABOVE MEETING AGENDA ITEM.

Dear Director Mosley and City Council,

PLEASE forward this to the staff member who can answer these questions.

I found the Staff Report for Item 7 – SB 1 Funds Project List for FY24-25 a little confusing for several reasons and would appreciate clarification on several points.

CLARIFY
: On page 2 of the Staff Report, Project #1 mentions “…and park pathway improvements on various streets throughout the City”
Q1a: What do you mean by “park pathway improvements”?
Q1b: What exact streets is this referring to?

CLARIFY
: The Staff Report says cities must submit a FY 2024/2025 project list before the end of FY 2024 which is June 30, 2024 to receive the SB1 funds. BUT after the 2 listed projects, it includes a statement that the staff can change these projects any time and the Council and public will only find out about it AFTER the fact, during the annual reporting process! Q2a: What is the process to change the priority of the use of these funds? Q2b: Who makes that priority change decision? Is there any review BEFORE the change is done?

CLARIFY
: On page 1 of the Staff Report, it appears that so long as the city keeps their Pavement Condition Index at 80 or above, they can spend these SB1 funds on just about anything in transportation, even if it is NOT a high priority item.

Q3a: Is there a Council-approved prioritized list of transportation items? Q3b: If so, where is it? What’s the process to make changes to it?

I would appreciate answers to these questions. It feels to me like this is a “free pot of taxpayer money” that can be used on any pet projects in transportation without Council oversight on their priorities or changes in priorities.

Sincerely,
Peggy Griffin
From: Hervé Marcy
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Clerk
Subject: Stevens Creek Boulevard protected bike lane project Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 3:59:41 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Esteemed Councilmembers,
my name is Herve Marcy. I am the Chair of the Bike Ped Commission, but write to you today in my name only.

I am writing in support of the project funding protected bike lanes on Stevens Creek Boulevard. Stevens Creek Boulevard is a dangerous corridor, as presented by consultants at our most recent bike-ped commission meeting (vision zero presentation): cyclists and pedestrians are at high risk when walking and biking there.

Protected bike lanes are the best way to make a street safe for cyclists and I highly recommend each an every one of you to support this project, which can and will save lives.

Thanks for your consideration,
Best regards,
Herve Marcy
Sent from Proton Mail
for iOS
From: J Shearin
To: City Council; Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Clerk Subject: City Council Agenda item 7: Use SB1 funding for Stevens Creek Boulevard protected bike lanes Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 3:54:10 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honorable Mayor Mohan and City Councilmembers:

I write to you today as a longtime resident of Cupertino who drives and bikes on Stevens Creek Boulevard regularly.

I ask you today to keep the funding for Class IV bike lanes on Stevens Creek in the list of projects to be funded by SB1 revenues.

There are two very important reasons for this: safety for cyclists and encouragement of the use of alternate transportation per our General Plan.

Stevens Creek Boulevard is one the top two streets in our city for traffic volumes and has the highest speed limit. With that comes a much higher propensity for accidents and for serious accidents. This is why the Class IV lanes were listed as both a Tier 1 project in the 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan—eight years ago now—and a Tier 1 in the 2018 Pedestrian Transportation Plan. More recent studies have also shown the very high accident rate on SCB, including the Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), and the recent draft Vision Zero plan, where these lanes are the top recommended project.

Between 2012 and 2021, 260 injury collisions were reported, including 16 severe injuries.

There are certainly many more unreported injuries and near-misses. The majority of all these accidents happened between Wolfe Road and CA-85, which is the length that is being recommended tonight for SB1 funding of bike lanes. These lanes need to be built for the safety of our residents.

A second important reason is that approving this tonight is a step in the direction of following through on the Mobility Element portion of our General Plan that was just approved during the last City Council meeting. Our Housing Element RHNA allocation is 4,588 new homes. We know that our streets, including our main arterials like Stevens Creek Boulevard, cannot handle a lot more traffic without ending up in gridlock. We must look forward to solutions to encourage residents to use alternate transportation, including bikes. This is a step toward making these “attractive choices” per the Mobility Plan.

Keeping the plan to use some of the SB1 funding for Stevens Creek Boulevard bike lanes is the right thing to do for the safety and the quality of life for our residents. I urge you to keep it as recommended by Staff.

Thank you for considering my input, and your work on behalf of all Cupertino residents.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Shearin
-----------------------------------
This message is from my personal email account. I am only writing as myself, not as a representative or spokesperson for any other organization.

From: Dino Sakkas
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Agenda Item 7 - Fund Protected Bike Lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 3:53:28 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen and council members, I am writing to express my support for continuation of funding for the protected Class IV bike lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd in the list of projects to be funded by SB1 revenues. I ride my bike up and down Stevens Creek frequently in the course of my daily activities. It is in desperate need of safety improvements.

Stevens Creek Blvd has been identified as a High Injury Corridor, accounting for a significant percentage of severe injuries and fatal crashes in the city.

Unsafe speeding is a common factor leading to these severe injuries, followed by traffic signals and sign violations.

Thank you for your attention to my email and for considering my perspective in your decision process.

Dino Sakkas
33 year resident of Cupertino
Safe Routes to School Panelist
From: Frank Geefay
To: City Council; Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Clerk Subject: Agenda Item 7: Funding Class 4 Protected Bicycle Lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd.

Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 3:43:48 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honorable Mayor Mohan and City Council
It is vital that we make our street safer for bicycles and pedestrians adding Class 4 Protected Bicycle Lanes will help do that. Precious Lives are at stake, and we must encourage more people to bicycle if we ever want to keep traffic in check as more housing is added according to the new Housing Element. To do otherwise is to increase the incidents of severe and fatal accidents as more cars are added to our roads. This must be a priority for all major and congested roadways, and what roadway is more so than Stevens Creek Blvd. There really is little choice when you come down to it because more housing in our city means more traffic and less safety. So please do what you know is right. The lives of our residents especially those who want to bike on our roads are depending on you.

Best Regards,
Frank Geefay
Long time and biking resident
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
From: John G
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Agenda Item 7 - SB1 Funds May 21 2024, Support Funding Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 3:33:45 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen and council members, I urge you to preserve funding for protected Class IV bike lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd in the list of projects to be funded by SB1 revenues. This is one of the most dangerous streets for cyclists in the city and has been listed as a priority for cycling safety improvements by the city since 2016.

Stevens Creek Blvd has been identified as a High Injury Corridor - the need is great.

Speeding was a major factor contributing to severe injuries, followed by traffic signals and sign violations.

Stevens Creek Boulevard is one of the city streets with the highest number of injuries, fatalities and dangerous intersections.

The 2016 Bike Plan prioritized safety improvements to this High Injury Corridor. It is a Tier 1 project.

The Cupertino Draft Vision Zero Plan ranks Stevens Creek Blvd as its number one recommended project.

Our newly approved Housing Element will bring 4,588 new homes to our city. We know that our streets, including our main arterials, cannot handle a lot more traffic.

We need new roadway solutions to encourage residents to use alternate transportation, including bikes.

Thank you,
John Geis
Cupertino Resident
[email protected]
From: Rob Tsuk
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Clerk
Subject: Fund Protected Bike Lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 3:33:29 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Greetings,
I am a thirty year resident of Cupertino on Dexter Drive who uses a bike for much of my commuting, both to work at Apple and to various medical appointments.

I ride on Stevens Creek Blvd both to get to Apple Park from my home and for appointments with the dentist. I think it would be an excellent use of city funds to provide protected bike lines on Stevens Creek Blvd.

I usually stick to lower-speed roads for my biking, but Stevens Creek is unavoidable to get some places I need to ride. Even at the posted speed limit there’s not much time for a bicyclist to react, and cars frequently drive well above it. A protected bike lane will save life and limb.

Best regards,
Rob Tsuk
408-835-4218
From: Connie Cunningham
To: City Clerk; City Council
Cc: Pamela Wu
Subject: 2024-5-21 CC Agenda Item 7 - Fund Protected Bike Lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 3:29:49 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Subject. Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/2025 projects proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) created by Senate Bill (SB) 1.

Recommended Action
Adopt Resolution No. 2024-XXX (Attachment A) establishing a list of projects proposed to be funded by $1,549,796 of SB 1 revenues, estimated to be received in FY 2024/2025 Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilmembers:

I am not pulling Consent Item Agenda Item 7, but if it were to be pulled: I urge you to fund this critical protected Bike Lane project for the following reasons:.

1. The project will be receiving funding from SB 1. That funding is critical to make the project workable. Do not let the opportunity pass.

2. More importantly, this protected bike lane is on Stevens Creek Blvd, a major artery that passes through our entire city and into the neighboring community. And it is NOT SAFE for BICYLISTS!
a, Cupertino Draft Vision Zero Plan rated this major artery as its #1 recommended project. b. Vision Zero supports previous planning documents like the 2016 Bike Plan. That plan prioritized safety on Stevens Creek Blvd and recommended protected lanes for the entire length of the corridor. They are being built over time. c. Car Drivers often consider bicyclists as impediments to car travel, rather than travelers along the same highway. Adding to that, car drivers often speed. And, car drivers often do not see bicyclists. Defensive driving for a car means avoiding an accident that mean car repairs and time delay. For a bicyclist an accident often mean serious injury or death. d. Records show that hundreds of injuries, including 16 severe injuries, have happened on SC Boulevard.

3. Since the result of an accident for bicyclists can mean death or long-time injury, and the chances of not being seen are so high, it is imperative that we, as city residents, fund safe, protected bike lanes.

Again, I urge you to fund Protected Bike Lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd. Adopt the resolution as Recommended in the Staff Report.

Connie Cunningham
Resident, Housing Commission (self only)
My family uses bicycles.

From: Rachna Tripathi
To: City Council; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Prioritize Road Maintenance Funds for RMRA and not bike lane project on agenda 7 Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 3:05:36 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Sheila and City Council,
I am writing to request the removal of agenda item 7 from the consent calendar for the 05/21/24 City Council meeting.

Please do not divert state funds intended for road repairs to bike lane projects, specifically the Stevens Creek Blvd Class IV bike lanes. The city already spends disproportionately on bike lanes compared to pedestrian safety and automotive needs. Pedestrian safety, the primary concern for fatalities and major injuries, receives far less funding.

Do not include the Stevens Creek Blvd Class IV bike lanes in the RMRA project list. These funds must be used solely for road maintenance and paving.

We expect Cupertino to maintain higher standards than cities like San Jose and Sunnyvale.

Our community pays significantly more and deserves well-maintained roads. Do not let our roads deteriorate to the conditions seen in neighboring cities.

Additionally, consider upcoming construction activities before paving. For example, a development notice is posted on Rae Ln at the Cupertino Swim and Racket Club. Avoid paving roads slated for immediate construction.

Please add Stevens Creek Blvd west of 85, Foothill Blvd, and Wolf Road to the RMRA project list, as they are heavily worn and in need of paving.

As a resident, I urge you to ensure RMRA funds are used exclusively for road maintenance and paving, not for bike lane projects.

I have been a Cupertino resident for the past 11 years.

Thank you.

Rachna Tripathi
Realtor
CalBRE #01960937
Keller Williams Realty- Silicon Valley
2110 S. Bascom Ave., Campbell, CA 95008
408.368.7700
[email protected]
From: Seema Lindskog
To: City Council; City Clerk; Pamela Wu; Matt Morley
Subject: Please fund the protected bike lanes on Stevens Creek Boulevard with SB 1 revenues Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 2:36:58 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen and council members, I urge you to keep funding for protected Class IV bike lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd in the list of projects to be funded by SB1 revenues. This is one of the most dangerous streets for cyclists in the city and has been listed as a priority for cycling safety improvements by the city since 2016.

Stevens Creek Blvd has been identified as a High Injury Corridor, accounting for a significant percentage of severe injuries and fatal crashes in the city. From 2012 to 2021, the corridor reported a total of 260 injury collisions, including 16 severe injuries. The majority of these occurred between Wolfe and I-85 in the Phase 2 stretch that is being recommended for SB1 funding.

Unsafe speeding was a common factor leading to these severe injuries, followed by traffic signals and sign violations.

Out of the 48 intersections in Cupertino where fatal or injury crashes occurred between 2012 and 2021, seven of them are on Stevens Creek Boulevard, making it one of the city streets with the highest number of dangerous intersections.

The 2016 Bike Plan prioritized safety improvements to this High Injury Corridor and recommended protected bike lanes for the entire length of the corridor which are being completed in phases.

The Cupertino Draft Vision Zero Plan ranks Stevens Creek Blvd as its highest priority recommended project.

Thank you for everything you do for this city.

Warm regards,
Seema Lindskog
Chair of the Advisory Board
Walk Bike Cupertino
___________________________________________________________________ "You must be the change you want to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi This message is from my personal email account. I am only writing as myself, not as a representative or spokesperson for any other organization.

From: Sunil Malkani
To: City Council; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Prioritize Road Maintenance Funds for RMRA and not Bike Lane Projects on agenda item 7 for 05/21/24 council meeting.

Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 2:33:54 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Sheila and City Council,
I am writing to request the removal of agenda item 7 from the consent calendar for the 05/21/24 City Council meeting.

Please do not divert state funds intended for road repairs to bike lane projects, specifically the Steven’s Creek Blvd Class IV bike lanes. The city already spends disproportionately on bike lanes compared to pedestrian safety and automotive needs. Pedestrian safety, the primary concern for fatalities and major injuries, receives far less funding.

Do not include the Steven’s Creek Blvd Class IV bike lanes in the RMRA project list. These funds must be used solely for road maintenance and paving.

We expect Cupertino to maintain higher standards than cities like San Jose and Sunnyvale.

Our community pays significantly more and deserves well-maintained roads. Do not let our roads deteriorate to the conditions seen in neighboring cities.

Additionally, consider upcoming construction activities before paving. For example, a development notice is posted on Rae Ln at the Cupertino Swim and Racket Club. Avoid paving roads slated for immediate construction.

Please add Steven’s Creek Blvd west of 85, Foothill Blvd, and Wolf Road to the RMRA project list, as they are heavily worn and in need of paving.

As a resident, I urge you to ensure RMRA funds are used exclusively for road maintenance and paving, not for bike lane projects.

Thank you.

Sunil Malkani
Cupertino resident for 22 years
--
Sunil Malkani
From: Deepa Mahendraker
To: City Council; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Prioritize Road Maintenance Funds for RMRA and not Bike Lane Projects on agenda item 7 for 05/21/24 council meeting.

Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 11:48:29 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Sheila and City Council,
I am writing to request the removal of agenda item 7 from the consent calendar for the 05/21/24 City Council meeting.

Please do not divert state funds intended for road repairs to bike lane projects, specifically the Steven’s Creek Blvd Class IV bike lanes. The city already spends disproportionately on bike lanes compared to pedestrian safety and automotive needs. Pedestrian safety, the primary concern for fatalities and major injuries, receives far less funding.

Do not include the Steven’s Creek Blvd Class IV bike lanes in the RMRA project list. These funds must be used solely for road maintenance and paving.

We expect Cupertino to maintain higher standards than cities like San Jose and Sunnyvale. Our community pays significantly more and deserves well-maintained roads. Do not let our roads deteriorate to the conditions seen in neighboring cities.

Additionally, consider upcoming construction activities before paving. For example, a development notice is posted on Rae Ln at the Cupertino Swim and Racket Club. Avoid paving roads slated for immediate construction.

Please add Steven’s Creek Blvd west of 85, Foothill Blvd, and Wolf Road to the RMRA project list, as they are heavily worn and in need of paving.

As a resident, I urge you to ensure RMRA funds are used exclusively for road maintenance and paving, not for bike lane projects.

Thank you.

Deepa
From: Ravi Kiran Singh
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: ## Prioritize Road Maintenance Funds for RMRA and not Bike Lane Projects on agenda item 7 for 05/21/24 council meeting
Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 9:21:03 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Sheila and City Council,
I respectfully request the removal of agenda item 7 from the consent calendar for the May 21st City Council meeting. This item proposes diverting state funds, designated for road repairs, to the Stevens Creek Blvd Class IV bike lane project.

I urge you to reconsider this decision for several reasons:

1. Misallocation of funds: State funds allocated through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) should be used exclusively for their intended purpose —road maintenance and paving. Diverting these funds to bike lane projects contradicts this mandate.

2. Prioritization of road safety: Pedestrian safety and road conditions should take precedence over bike lane projects. Cupertino has a disproportionate focus on bike lanes compared to pedestrian safety and automotive needs, despite the latter being primary concerns for fatalities and major injuries.

3. Community expectations: Cupertino residents pay significantly higher taxes compared to neighboring cities and expect well-maintained roads. Diverting funds from road repairs will inevitably lead to deteriorating conditions, comparable to those seen in San Jose and Sunnyvale.

4. Inefficient use of resources: Paving roads slated for immediate construction, such as Rae Ln at the Cupertino Swim and Racket Club, is an inefficient use of resources. I suggest adding Stevens Creek Blvd west of 85, Foothill Blvd, and Wolf Road to the RMRA project list instead, as these roads are in dire need of repair.

In conclusion, I urge you to prioritize the safety and well-being of all Cupertino residents by ensuring that RMRA funds are used solely for road maintenance and paving. Please reconsider the inclusion of the Stevens Creek Blvd Class IV bike lanes in the RMRA project list. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Ravi Kiran Singh
Cupertino Resident
From: Santosh Rao
To: City Council; City Clerk
Subject: 05/21 council meeting. Agenda item 7. Please do NOT divert road repair funds to bike lanes.

Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 9:09:34 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Sheila and City Council,
I am writing today about agenda item 7 on the consent calendar for the 05/21/24 City Council meeting.

I request that you kindly pull this item from the consent calendar.

I strongly beseech you not to divert state funds meant for road repairs to bike lane projects, specifically in this case, the Steven’s Creek Blvd Class IV bike lanes.

The city seems to spend an enormous and disproportionate amount of money on bike lanes relative to spending on pedestrian safety, automotive safety, and traffic enforcement.

The city has access to other state grants and Apple grants to fund bike lane projects where needed. The city has continued to spend inequitably on bike lanes when pedestrian safety is the primary and major issue of fatalities and major injuries, on which the city has spent significantly less than on bike lanes.

Please do NOT list Steven’s Creek Blvd Class IV bike lanes in the RMRA project list. These funds must be used entirely and fully for road maintenance and paving.

We have heard you say Cupertino is better than San Jose and Sunnyvale. We expect Cupertino to be better than those cities. We pay far more for this community and don’t want you comparing us constantly to San Jose or other cities. Please do NOT turn our roads into the condition of roads we see in Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, and San Jose.

Again, I implore you to please remove any and all references to bike lane projects from the RMRA project list and devote the RMRA funds wholly and solely to road paving maintenance and road improvements.

Further, the RMRA list seems to ignore upcoming construction activity. It is my understanding that a notice of development has been placed on Rae Ln at the Cupertino Swim and Racket Club. Given potential upcoming construction, why would you be paving Rae Ln now? Please select roads that are not in the path of immediate construction.

Please add Steven’s Creek Blvd west of 85, Foothill Blvd, and Wolf Road to the RMRA project list. These roads are heavily worn down and need paving.

As a resident, I am counting on you to ensure the use of RMRA funds for road maintenance and paving and not to divert those funds to bike projects.

Thank you.

Thanks,
Santosh Rao
From: Helene Davis
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Class IV Bike Lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd.

Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 5:54:03 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council,
I realize this is a late email but I am writing to encourage you to support the Class IV bike lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd. There are many cyclist such as myself who run errands, attend meetings, etc. in the community and who commute by bike.

I'd like the council to look at the big picture and envision what kind of vibrant community we would like to see for our selves and for the next generation. Complete Streets, Vision Zero, active transportation, however you want to look at it, consideration of all modes of transport makes our community more welcoming to all who share our streets.

Cupertino is also not in a bubble. The Class IV lanes would connect with Santa Clara and San Jose. These cities are also considering improving their section of the corridor. We don't want to be like Santa Clara County voting against BART way back in the 60's. Please consider the bigger picture.

Regards,
Helene Davis
From: helen wiant
To: City Council; Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Clerk Subject: Keep funding for protected bike lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 5:12:56 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen and council members, Please keep funding for protected Class IV bike lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd in the list of projects to be funded by SB1 revenues. Protected bike lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd are key towards improving cycling safety in Cupertino - they have been a priority for cycling safety improvements for eight years and they need to be implemented. Stevens Creek Blvd is a High Injury Corridor and accounts for a significant percentage of severe injuries and fatal crashes over the last decade.

The 2016 Bike Plan prioritized safety improvements for this High Injury Corridor and recommended protected bike lanes for its entire length to be completed in phases. It is a Tier 1 project in both the bike and pedestrian transportation plans.

With approved new housing that will generate more traffic, we must find solutions to encourage residents to use alternate transportation, including bikes. It is imperative to make the community feel safer to use bikes for commuting to school and work. Stevens Creek Blvd is an important artery for commuting. Please continue to support and prioritize the funding for protected class IV bike lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd.

Thank you,
Helen Wiant
10354 Westacres Drive
Cupertino CA
From: Rattehalli Sudesh
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Clerk
Subject: Stevens Creek Blvd Protected bike lane
Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 5:00:25 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Respected Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen and council members, I am a 25 year resident of Cupertino, and have had a wonderful and rewarding career here, living and working at Kaiser Santa Clara medical center. I recently retired from my professional medical career as an Oculoplastic surgeon. I had the fortune to commute to work by bike for the last 10 years or so. I would have biked even more if it was not for the fact that our roads are not that safe. My children studied in local schools, and when in high school (Monta Vista), they were biked to school. That was a great bonus for us as parents, as both my wife and myself are surgeons, and it did give us some freedom from the hassle of driving them to school daily. It was of course at a great cost, as we were always worried about their safety on the roads. And, unfortunately, I was first hand to almost witness a fatality on Bubb road, it happened as I was stuck in my car on Bubb, ( I was at September and Bubb) commuting to work by car on that sad day. I myself have had a few close calls on my bike, a distracted young man reversed from his driveway on to Stelling, and knocked me down on to the street, I would have been run over, if there was any traffic at that time, my lucky stars, the roads were empty.

Over the years, I have seen really good improvements for safe biking in our city. Kudos to the people working to getting it done.One of the best improvements was when McClellnan road got protected lanes, and soon after a segment of Stevens Creek Blvd got it too. You cannot describe the difference that makes to people on bikes. It is day and night. And, I am now patiently awaiting the next phase of this project, to get the rest of Stevens Creek blvd protected bike lanes. This will only get more people on bikes, less car trips, more kids on bikes to school, less traffic jams for school drop offs and pickups, less pollution, better health and the benefits are endless.

What are we waiting for, let’s get this done- this is Vision Zero. Let’s not be blind to this fact.

Rattehalli Sudesh, MD
7827 Creekline Drive
Cupertino, CA 95014
From: Carols Gmail
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Approve using SB1 funds for Stevens Creek Boulevard Bike Lanes (item 7) Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 5:00:04 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice Mayor Fruen and Councilmembers,
Let’s continue our progress to make our streets safer for bicyclists. This is the right path forward. We need to look forward and plan for the future!
Please approve the SB1 funds for Stevens Creek Blvd Bike lanes.

Carol Stanek
Speaking for myself
From: Jian He
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Clerk
Subject: Support Stevens Creek Boulevard protected bike lane project Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 4:56:52 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good afternoon, city council members,
This is Jian He, a Cupertino resident near Blackberry Farm and a board member for a local volunteer-based group Walk Bike Cupertino. I heard you will make a big decision for the Stevens Creek Boulevard protected bike lane project tonight. I am writing to support this important safety improvement.

I bike from home to the Union Church of Cupertino regularly, and many times, speeding cars were passing by me on my bike. It feels very risky and scary. With protected bike lanes, more people would feel safe to bike on this major street to reach parks, stores and churches along the way.

Thank you so much for your good world for our city! You are truly public servants who care about our community!
--
Blessings,
Jian
"...all things work together for good..." --- Romans 8:28 From: louise saadati
To: City Council
Cc: Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Clerk
Subject: Keep funding to protect Class IV bike lanes on SCB Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 4:52:35 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen
and council members,
Please keep funding to protect our
citizens who travel on Stevens Creek. It
would appear to be callous and uncaring
to ignore safety, injuries and deaths on
Stevens Creek Blvd. Please vote to keep
the funding.

Please keep funding for protected Class
IV bike lanes on Stevens Creek Blvd in
the list of projects to be funded by SB1
revenues. This is one of the most
dangerous streets for cyclists in the city
and has been listed as a priority for
cycling safety improvements by the city
since 2016.

Stevens Creek Blvd has been
identified as a High Injury Corridor,
accounting for a significant
percentage of severe injuries and fatal
crashes in the city. From 2012 to
2021, the corridor reported a total of
260 injury collisions, including 16
severe injuries. The majority of these
occurred between Wolfe and I-85 in
the Phase 2 stretch that is being
recommended for SB1 funding.

Unsafe speeding was a common
factor leading to these severe injuries,
followed by traffic signals and sign
violations.

Out of the 48 intersections in
Cupertino where fatal or injury
crashes occurred between 2012 and
2021, seven of them are on Stevens
Creek Boulevard, making it one of the
city streets with the highest number of
dangerous intersections.

The 2016 Bike Plan prioritized safety
improvements to this High Injury
Corridor and recommended protected
bike lanes for the entire length of the
corridor which are being completed in
phases. It is a Tier 1 project in BOTH
the Bike and Pedestrian
Transportation Plans.

The Cupertino Draft Vision Zero Plan
ranks Stevens Creek Blvd as its
number one recommended project.

Our newly approved Housing Element
will bring 4,588 new homes to our city.

We know that our streets, including
our main arterials, cannot handle a lot
more traffic without ending up in
gridlock. We must look forward to
solutions to encourage residents to
use alternate transportation, including
bikes. This is one way to make these
“attractive choices” per the just
approved Mobility Element in our
General Plan.

Class IV bike lanes on Stevens Creek
Blvd in the list of projects to be funded by
SB1 revenues. This is one of the most
dangerous streets for cyclists in the city
and has been listed as a priority for
cycling safety improvements by the city
since 2016.

Stevens Creek Blvd has been
identified as a High Injury Corridor,
accounting for a significant
percentage of severe injuries and fatal
crashes in the city. From 2012 to
2021, the corridor reported a total of
260 injury collisions, including 16
severe injuries. The majority of these
occurred between Wolfe and I-85 in
the Phase 2 stretch that is being
recommended for SB1 funding.

Unsafe speeding was a common
factor leading to these severe injuries,
followed by traffic signals and sign
violations.

Out of the 48 intersections in
Cupertino where fatal or injury
crashes occurred between 2012 and
2021, seven of them are on Stevens
Creek Boulevard, making it one of the
city streets with the highest number of
dangerous intersections.

The 2016 Bike Plan prioritized safety
improvements to this High Injury
Corridor and recommended protected
bike lanes for the entire length of the
corridor which are being completed in
phases. It is a Tier 1 project in BOTH
the Bike and Pedestrian
Transportation Plans.

The Cupertino Draft Vision Zero Plan
ranks Stevens Creek Blvd as its
number one recommended project.

Our newly approved Housing Element
will bring 4,588 new homes to our city.

We must look forward to solutions to
encourage residents to use alternate
transportation, including bikes. This is
one way to make these “attractive
choices” per the just approved
Mobility Element in our General Plan.

Please keep funding to protect our
citizens who travel on Stevens Creek.

It
would appear to be callous and uncaring
to ignore safety, injuries and deaths on
Stevens Creek Blvd.

Please vote to keep
the funding.

Sincerely,
Louise Saadati

Sent from my iPhone
From: Aaryan Doshi
To: City Council; City Clerk
Subject: Keep SB1 Funding for Bike Lanes on Stevens Creek Boulevard Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 4:40:46 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen and Council Members, I hope you are doing well today. I am writing in the hopes that today you keep funding for protected bike lanes on Stevens Creek Boulevard. I urge you to keep this as a project to be funded by the SB1 grant for a multitude of reasons.

Stevens Creek Boulevard has some of the most accidents in our neighborhood per year. I, myself, as a frequent cyclist feel almost bare riding along these roads.

Keeping Stevens Creek safe has been a top priority for a very long time. Removing these bike lanes would do a disservice to the Cupertino community at large.

Not only that, but many plans such as Vision Zero emphasize this as being a paramount priority --- with the hundreds of collisions in the last year, it is imperative that we take action and dedicate a portion of the SB1 funding to keeping bike lanes.

With even more homes scheduled to be built in the coming months, traffic will only become worse. Navigating by bike on Stevens Creek will become both extremely difficult and dangerous!
Thank you so much for taking my thoughts into consideration.

It is people like you who help make Cupertino the amazing city that it is today! Thank you for doing all that you do in making our city safe for all.

Sincerely,
Aaryan Doshi (Monta Vista High School)
From:

To:

Subject:

Date:

Get Outlook for iOS
Debra Nascimento​​​​
Executive Assistant
City

Manager's

Office
[email protected]
(408)
777-1302
From: Joel Wolf <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 4:08:27 PM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Subject: Tonight's Agenda Item # 7
Dear Mayor Mohan, Vice-Mayor Fruen and Council Members, I am writing in regard to tonight’s Agenda Item #7, and more specifically the portion of the agenda item associated with the Stevens Creek Blvd protected bike lane Phases 2A and 2B.

I strongly advocate that this project be included in the list of projects to be funded by SB1 revenues.

This is an important part of the Cupertino bicycling
infrastructure, making it safer to bicycle on this busy corridor.

This project encourages
cycling along this corridor, removing auto traffic, reducing traffic noise and reducing greenhouse gases.

In addition, given the higher density housing that is planned along this corridor, it is particularly important that cycling over auto use be encouraged as a mode of transportation.

Thank you for your consideration.

Joel Wolf
Vice-Chair
Bike-Ped Commission
Joel

Wolf​​​​
Bicycle and Pedestrian Commissioner
[email protected]

CC 05-21-2024
Item #8
Approve Third
Amendment with
Chandler Asset
Management and
Rehabilitation Account
Written Communications
From: Rhoda Fry
To: City Clerk; City Council
Subject: City Council Agenda 5/21/2024 #8 Chandler
Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 7:11:45 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council,
Questions regarding City Council Agenda 5/21/2024 #8 Chandler:

1. The contract contains this statement: Assist with reviewing and recommending any appropriate amendments to the City's Investment Policy at the outset of the contract term, and assist with the annual review and update of the Investment Policy

At what times did Chandler do a review of the Investment Policy in the last 5 years? Why was this one line of text added to the investment policy after $45M was moved? “By adopting this Policy, the City Council delegates to the City Treasurer the authority to invest or to reinvest City funds, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased pursuant to Government Code Section 53607.”

2. The second amendment expired on December 31, 2023. It seems that for all of 2024, we have not had an active contract with Chandler. Why?

Thanks,
Rhoda Fry
Virus-free.www.avg.com
CC 05-21-2024
Item #10
City Manager's Third
Quarter Financial
Report for FY 2023-24
Written Communications
From: Rhoda Fry
To: City Clerk; City Council
Subject: City Council 5/21/2024 Agenda Item #10 Q3 Report Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 8:19:54 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council,

Regarding City Council 5/21/2024 Agenda Item #10 Q3 Report.

According to the city’s opengov website, the City has now budgeted for $45.5M in Employee Compensation and benefits. In FY 2018/19, our actual expenses were $31.2M!!! The budget is bloated. Even last year 2022/3, our expenses were $38.6. Please, stop bloating the budget.

See
https://cupertino.opengov.com/transparency/#/28185/accountType=expenses&embed=n&bre akdown=28459e6a-563e-4695-97d4-
8a0d97d881e1&currentYearAmount=false&currentYearPeriod=false&graph=bar&legendSort =desc&proration=true&saved_view=111352&selection=436F3ABB13EDF4AD7D0C0B7A3 43CEA3A&projections=null&projectionType=null&highlighting=null&highlightingVariance =null&year=2024&selectedDataSetIndex=null&fiscal_start=2019&fiscal_end=latest

Please explain the numbers. The $30M sales-tax drop in revenue number does not make sense, “CDTFA audit of a taxpayer was projected to result in a $30 million loss in sales tax revenue.” In FY 2018/2019, received about $12M in net sales-tax revenue from Apple. However, even in FY 2018/19, the City was saving money, even while spending lavishly. During the highest fiscal year earnings in 20/21, the City’s net sales tax revenue from Apple was about $26M. I don’t know where that $30M is coming from. Please stop exaggerating. We need to look at the spending side.

Cost of Contract Services: Law enforcement is a big part of our contract services. Please put law enforcement costs on its own line item. This will provide greater transparency for other contract services. It seems that we spend too much money on go-nowhere studies. That has got to stop.

The term “defund” (page 18) is used to cover different events. One is where a project just won’t be done. Another is where we came in under budget for a project and the money is being refunded to the general fund. That is a good thing, but I don’t think that the word “defund” accurately represents what is happening.

Regarding the statement:
“Increase revenues by $19.4 million to account for Sales Tax revenue adjustments.” This statement was initially confusing. We are not looking to increase revenues – we are looking at adjusting the budget based on revenues that we are receiving that will need to be returned to the state.

Regards,
Rhoda Fry
CC 05-21-2024
Item #11
Initial Study Session on FY
2024-25 Proposed
Operating and CIP
Budgets
Written Communications
From: Rhoda Fry
To: City Clerk; City Council
Subject: Public Comment City Council #11 Budget 5/21/2024 Where are the Resident"s of Cupertino? Date: Monday, May 20, 2024 10:02:30 AM
Attachments: img388.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council,

Why are the Residents of Cupertino missing from Cupertino’s Org Chart in the Budget document?
According to the new budget document, the City Council no longer officially works for the Residents of Cupertino.

Why?
The previous org chart had the Residents of Cupertino at the top - - - WHERE THEY BELONG.

I surveyed a number of other org charts in nearby city budgets and found that the City Councils consistently report to the Residents.

Please see attached images.

I am dismayed that neither the mayor nor the city manager could explain why this happened at the Mayor’s monthly meeting on 5/13/2024, and by this time, they were well aware that it had happened because I reported the issue in oral communications on 5/7/2024. Many residents are feeling that the omission of residents represents the true sentiments of the City Council and City Staff. I think that this is a mistake. Please explain how this happened, keep the peace and fix the org chart.

If you google California City Org Chart, you will find even more California City Org Charts, overwhelmingly with the residents, citizens, or electorate on top. https://www.google.com/search?
sca_esv=31a3dd54a4fd3d08&sca_upv=1&rlz=1C1EJFC_enUS862US862&q=california+city +org+chart&tbm=isch&source=lnms&prmd=invsmbt&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiWo- 7P2JyGAxXnOjQIHUtRBAMQ0pQJegQIDBAB&biw=1579&bih=751&dpr=1.1#imgrc=xjz ZEB7ZrOmsHM

Regards,
Rhoda Fry, 40-year RESIDENT of CUPERTINO
Virus-free.www.avg.com
}a8pnq pasodoJd 9Z-tyzoz ^]uO!]JnpoJ]ul

}a8pnq pa]dopv FZ-€ZOZ ^JuO!]JnpoI]ul

Ftotun
__

iP.
tJ
®
r)
<0-a
E3
®
Er+
d
E<-.1a
E'
i®
a
9,-
CA
®
!.
i=
a fD=
® 0'
Cnrl] OqaI>tBa=
C^CJ®00'I=0=ICDCBCLC^
a.

B®
I
C=
ia,
5 7J®
Ga
a=

Administrative
Services Department
Programs
Admin istrative Servi cos
Finance
Human Resources
Information Technology
lT Equipmenv
Replacement
Ciffice Support
Non-Departmental
Risk Management
Workers Compensation
City Manager
and
Community Services
Deparwhents
Programs
City Manager's Office
City Clerk's Cfflce
Public Information Office
Publi c safety/
Emergen cy Prepared ness
Recreation
Faci lity Rentals
Community Engagement
City Funded Events
Community Events Grants
Community Support
Services
*FIE = full time equvalert personnel; 2080 hours per year per 1.0 FTE Community
Development
Deparfroent
Programs
Development Services
Advanced Planning
Code Compliance
Building Inspection
Facility Maintenance
Furniture, Fixtures, &
Equipment
Public Works
Departhent
Programs
General Engineering
Development
Engineering
Envi ronmental Services
Streets & Storm Drains
Parks & Landscape
Mai ntenance
Vehicle & Equipment
Maintenance
Lighting & Landscape
Districts
Capital Improvement
Program

Town of Los Gatos
Organizational Structure
Polic e Adnrfutration
Records/Communicalons
Patrol
lnvcstigatious
Trafric
Supportscrviccs
Parkmg Managcmcn(
General Ifdger
Accounts Payable
Ac counts Rec eivab le
Payroll
Business Liccuse Tax
Puehasing
BudgcL ^d minis hatioii
Financial Rcporing
Treasury & Investments
a-14
PPW Administrition
Park Services
F,ngineering llevelopment
Ei`ginecring Program
Strects & Signals
Building Mainrfuance
Landscape & Lighting
Environmcntal Services
8elnen'Boards & Com'missions
Electlon Co ordination
Chins & lusuiancc
Customer Service Center
=#hoLaf#eof,o£:dn,nation
CA£L#crouledrfcastingManagcmenL
Cormunity G rants
Lit)ray Adnrmistration
Rcfcrcnc c S crviccs
Children' s Program
Reading/Litcrac y Progrtam
Co Llec lio n Maintenanc e
Circulation & Systcm
AdministraLion
Los Gatos History Program

CITY GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATloN

MOUNTAIN VIEW RESIDENTS

CITY COUNCIL
CllY ATTORN EY CITY MANAGER CITY AUDITOR*
cOMMUNirv

DEVELOPMENT
HUMAN

RESOURCES

COMMUNITY

SERVICES

LIBRARY
clrv MANAGER's
OFFICE

HOUSING
PUBLIC
WORKS

INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY
KEY: ( ) ELECTED
a APPOINTEDBYCOUNCIL
I APPOINTED BYcllY MANAGER

CITY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES
Charter Non-Charter

FINANCE AND

ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES
POLICE
Environmental planning Commission
Board of Library Trustees
Parks and Recreation Commission
Rental Housing Committee
Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Downtown Committee
Human Relations Commission
Performing Arts Committee
Public Safety Advisory Board
Senior Advisory Committee
Tennis Advisory Board
Visual Arts Committee
Youth Advisory Committee
* Finance and Administrative Services Director serves as City Auditor as appointed by City Council.

BUD/OC-GENERAL FY2023-24
Table of Contents
-iii-

Palo Alto Flesidents
City Council
Clty Attorney
Molly Stump
CIty Maiiager.

Ed Shikada
Adm]n!stratlv® Services
Lauren Lai, Director/Chief Financial
Community Services
Kristen O'Kane, Director
Fire Doparfment
Geoffrey Blackshire, Chief
Ihformat[on Techriology
Darren Numoto, Chief Information
L!brary
Gayathri Kanth, Director
Office of Emergency Sorvic
Kenneth Dueker, Director
I OfficerOfficeres
C]ty Clerk
Mahealani Ah Yun
City Audito,.

Vacant
Human Resources
Sandra Blanch, Director/Chief People Officer
Plahhing ar.d Development
Jonathan Lait, Director
Police Department
Andrew Binder, Chief
Public Woi'ks
Brad Eggleston, Director
ut][[t'es
Dean Batchelor, Director
+The Office of Transportation is situated in the City Manager's Office. 26 INTRODUCTION.

Log ALTOS HILLS

CALIFORNIA
Committees
Community Relations -Emergency
Comm.-
Environ. Design & Protection -Environ.

Initiatives -Finance & Investment -
History -Open Space -
Parks & Recreation -Pathways
- Public Art -Technology
Residents of
Los Altos Hills
City Council
Linda Swan, Mayor
Stanley Mok, Vice Mayor
Lisa Schmidt
Kavita Tankha
George Tyson
Commissions
Planning
Library
LA/LAH Senior
LA/LAH Joint Volunteer
Youth
11 lana8er City Attorney
PirneJ'ad Steve Mattas -Meyers rvcrve
Office of the
City Manafzer
Administration
City clerk
Public
Information
Community
Services
Recreation
Emergency
Preparedness
Administrative
Services
Treasurer
Finance
Risk
Management
Human
Resources
Contracts
Engineering &
Public Works
Roads
Sewers
Maintenance
Operations
Parks & Facilities
Management
Special Projects
Community
Development
Building
Planning
Inspections
Code
Enforcement
Law Enforcement
Services Captain Neil
Valenzuela Contract
13 IT Services
Contract
Town of Los Altos Hills
Adopted FY 2023-24 Operating Budget and
FY 2024-2028 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan

← All documents from this meeting