Written Communications (Updated 4/16/25) — Cupertino City Council, April 15, 2025

CC 04-15-2025
O
ral
Communications
Wr
itten Comments
From: Santosh Rao
To: City Clerk
Subject: Fw: Request to Halt Unapproved Gas-to-Electric Appliance Ordinance Effort Date: Sunday, April 13, 2025 10:02:03 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
[Writing on behalf of myself, as a Cupertino resident, voter and taxpayer.] Dear City Clerk,
Would you please include in written communications for the upcoming city council meeting.

Dear Mayor Liang Chao, Vice Mayor Kitty Moore, and Cupertino City Council Members,
I am writing to express my concern regarding a recent social media post from the City of Cupertino soliciting resident input on a potential ordinance to limit or ban gas appliances in homes and businesses.

To my knowledge, this initiative was neither discussed during the recent Community Work Plan (CWP) process nor prioritized or funded by the Council. I respectfully request that the Council and Mayor direct staff to halt this initiative immediately. Proceeding with a project that lacks Council approval risks misallocation of limited staff resources and funding, which could be better directed toward projects explicitly supported by Council—such as the urban forest initiative.

Additionally, I would like to remind the Council that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has already ruled against a similar ordinance passed by the City of Berkeley, citing federal preemption under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. Pursuing a similar path in Cupertino could expose the City to unnecessary legal challenges.

It is also important to consider the unique demographic needs of Cupertino.

Nearly 70% of our residents are of Asian descent, and gas appliances are essential for traditional Asian and Indian cooking methods, both in homes and in our restaurants. Attempts to limit or ban gas usage do not reflect the cultural realities or culinary practices of a significant portion of our community.

Given that this effort was not approved through the CWP process, I urge the Council to cancel it immediately and focus on initiatives that reflect Council direction and community priorities.

Thank you for your attention to this matter and for your continued commitment to thoughtful governance and cultural inclusivity.

Sincerely,
San Rao (Cupertino resident and voter)
——————————
Court ruling:

California Restaurant Association v. City of Berkeley (2023): On April 17, 2023, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Berkeley's 2019 ordinance that banned natural gas piping in new construction. The court ruled that the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act preempts local regulations that effectively ban gas appliances.
Sonoma County's Suspension of Natural Gas Ban (2024): Following the 9th Circuit's decision, Sonoma County suspended its prohibition on natural gas appliances in new construction in August 2024, acknowledging that federal law overrides such local bans.
Santa Rosa: In May 2024, Santa Rosa suspended enforcement of its all-electric code for new residential constructions.

Sunnyvale: In May 2024, Sunnyvale suspended its natural gas ban to avoid potential litigation, acknowledging that its regulations were structured differently from Berkeley's.
San Mateo County: In May 2024, San Mateo County paused its efforts to promote all-electric buildings in response to the legal developments. San Luis Obispo:

April 18, 2023: The City Council voted unanimously to suspend its natural gas ban for new construction in response to the appellate court's ruling against Berkeley's similar ordinance. Cal Coast News
July 18, 2023: The city announced a pause in enforcing its all-electric new buildings ordinance, allowing permits for mixed-fuel buildings until further notice.
——————————-
City communications on the project:
“
The City of Cupertino is considering a policy to transition home appliances and equipment that use natural gas to those that use electricity. This transition is essential for fighting climate change.

To help inform and guide this draft policy, we invite you to share your knowledge, experience, and opinions on home electrification. This refers to using electric appliances and equipment, such as electric panel upgrades, induction cooktops, heat pump water heaters, and heat pump air conditioning and heating systems.

What could this policy look like?
The City is carefully considering options for what is best for our community and is limited on what we can do legally. Here are a few concepts:

Option 1: (most ambitious) Require homes to meet a whole-house energy efficiency standard.

Option 2: (somewhat ambitious)Require an “electric-ready” home (panel upgrade and wiring) and allow for the switch from gas to electric to happen as appliances need replacing.

Option 3: (least ambitious) Phase in requirements over time, e.g. require “electric-ready” homes now and a stricter energy efficiency standard in a few years.

Option 4: (not ambitious) Support the policies and programs created by state and regional districts and consider local policy at a later date.

Each of these options comes with some concerns and challenges to overcome. We need your help planning the best path for Cupertino. “
https://engagecupertino.org/goelectricsurvey?tool=survey_tool#tool_tab From: Kirsten Squarcia
To: City Clerk
Subject: FW: 4/15/2025 Oral Communications
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:33:35 PM
Attachments: image017.png
image018.png
image019.png
image020.png
image021.png
image022.png
image023.png
image024.png
image025.png
image026.png
image027.png
image028.png
image029.png
image030.png
image031.png
image032.png
FHDA LETTER.pdf
Kirsten Squarcia
City Clerk
City

Manager's

Office
[email protected]
(408) 777-3225
From:

Kitty Moore <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:29 PM
To: Pamela Wu <[email protected]>
Cc: Kirsten Squarcia <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: 4/15/2025 Oral Communications
Hi Pamela,
Will this email automatically go to written communications for oral communications now or do I need to make a special request? I think the rules changed on this matter but I cannot recall.

Thank you,
Kitty
Kitty Moore
Vice Mayor
City

Council
[email protected]
(408) 777-1389

From: Rhoda Fry <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 at 3:05 PM
To: City Clerk <[email protected]>, City Council <[email protected]> Subject: 4/15/2025 Oral Communications
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council,

Please do what you can immediately to prevent the removal of the Terrace Apartments from our City. This complex with 94 homes is the only large complex that serves the Monta Vista tri-school area. This promotes diversity in our community. Many of the folks are immigrants who are not yet citizens and given the current political climate, it is understandable why you might not be hearing from them. Please find a letter attached that I have sent to the board and to you previously.

Additionally, this is a remarkably poor use of our tax dollars. For every $1M assessed, we are paying nearly $300 a year in supplemental taxes to fund bonds, which are being used to displace our own residents. This is unthinkable. I sincerely hope that you can talk some sense in to the college board as there are better solutions.

In addition to the attached, the Villages at Cupertino Apartment Complex has just been sold for $207M or $433K per apartment. “On a per-unit basis, the price that the Rockpoint Group affiliate paid for the recent transaction points to a per-unit value that is about 2.8% less than what was paid for the 110 units about two years ago.” By comparison, the Terrace is proposed to sell for $713K per apartment! Similarly, Villages has 27 acres (sold for $7.6M per acre).

Terrace has 5.4 acres (proposed to sell for $12.4M per acre). Prometheus paid $52M for a complex that was in much poorer condition than it had expected and is hoping to sell at $67M.

Terrace does not look like a good deal. In my opinion, it is a mis-use of public funds. See:
https://www.siliconvalley.com/2025/04/03/cupertino-home-economy-apple-property-real- estate-apartment-jobs-tech/
If it is turned into student-housing, Cupertino will not receive property taxes on that property but will be on the hook to provide services. Will the College District also force the City to install traffic lights so that students going to De Anza College can also cross McClellan Road? Keep in mind that there is an intention to also bus students to Sunnyvale and Los Altos Hills campuses, 8.6 and 6.5 miles away.

Somehow, the district is saying what they’re doing is human-centered. They’ll provide relocation services and residents will be able to find “comparable homes” within a 10-mile radius!!! Evicting people 10 miles away is wrong and cruel. The district is fine kicking them out of our schools, our school district, our college district, and our City.

Please use any and all measures possible to prevent this significant change-in-use.

Regards,
Rhoda
1 RE: Proposed Community College Student Housing Purchase Gone Awry Dear Foothill-De Anza (FHDA) Board of Trustees,
In 2020, your constituents voted for an $898M bond to provide “local students an affordable education” which contained a line item to “plan, construct, acquire or contribute to affordable employee and student housing units.” I applaud the district for considering the cost of housing as part of providing an affordable education. Unfortunately, after countless studies and expenses, the Board has been misled by its consultant in entertaining the purchase of the McClellan Terrace Apartments on 7954 McClellan Rd, Cupertino, presently owned by Prometheus. The consultant failed to provide you with the data you needed to make an informed decision.

I am asking you to abandon this proposal and consider options that would better serve our community. A description of these issues follows: the proposed student rent is too high; the apartments have a large K-12 population that would be permanently displaced; the apartments are more affordable than most in our community and simply replacing residents does not help to improve the issue of affordability in our community; the purchase is likely a bad real estate deal; there are better options that are closer to transit and shopping. Permanently displacing Cupertino residents robs our community of economic diversity and disproportionally impacts non-citizen residents who fuel Silicon Valley’s economy.

The venture fails to achieve the goal of providing an affordable education as the consultant has targeted the rent at 30% to 50% of AMI (Area Median Income). Why didn’t the consultant provide an actual target rent? 50% of AMI for a single person is $64.5K. A student working at a minimum wage of $18.20 per hour for 15 hours a week for 50 weeks a year would earn $13,650 (20 hours weekly for 50 weeks yields $18,200). Targeting 50% of AMI per the requirements of the bond is a misuse of public funds.

The permanent displacement of sixty-seven K-12 public-school students from the only apartment complex within a half-mile of the Monta Vista tri-school area is wrong. No one told your constituents that the bond measure would result in our neighbors being evicted and permanently displaced from our schools and from our city.

Although the consultant proudly announced that De Anza students presently reside at the complex, she ignored that the number one selling point of these apartments is their proximity to our public K-12 schools: Lincoln Elementary and Kennedy Middle in the Cupertino Union School District (CUSD) and Monta Vista High School in the Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD). Prometheus’ tagline for their 94 homes is: “Garden Apartments within Walking Distance to Top Cupertino Schools.” There are 33 CUSD children and 34 FUHSD children who reside in these 94 homes (2 children attend FUHSD at other locations) for a total of 65 students attending the adjacent school sites. What will you tell them? The tri-school area is heavily impacted by school traffic and having sixty-five K-12 students within a half-mile of K-12 schools reduces traffic and pollution. The proposed change-in-use of 2 the Terrace Apartments to student housing would be a significant impact that permanently removes 94 homes that pipeline into the adjacent K-12 public schools. There is no greater good in the concept of permanently evicting grade K-12 students for the benefit of grade 13-14 students who could live elsewhere.

Terrace rents are more affordable than others in the area. Yet, the consultant said that residents could be relocated and that Prometheus would assist with relocation to their other properties.

According to a Zillow search, as compared with the Terrace’s maximum rent of $3720, there are only fourteen 2 bedroom / 2 bath homes of at least 1000 square feet that rent for under $4000.

Prometheus properties, are more expensive and outside of the tri-school area. And the vast majority of other comparable rental properties are more expensive. Residents would be permanently displaced from our community.

Prometheus
Complex Name
2br/2ba Sq Ft Rent Prometheus Relocation Doesn’t Work

All other Prometheus Homes are more
expensive than the Terrace

All other Prometheus Homes are outside
of the tri-school K-12 area: Lincoln,
Kennedy, Monta Vista.

Terrace 1150 Sq Ft $3570 - $3720
Biltmore 1005 – 1087 Sq Ft $4526 - $4826
City Center 933 Sq Ft $4704 - $4309
Holloway 1147 Sq Ft $4296 - $4321
Markham 981 – 1092 Sq Ft $3806 - $4475
Park Center 1165 – 1186 Sq Ft $4224 - $4229
Sonter 960 Sq Ft $4061 - $4075

Terrace is the only large complex that is in the Monta Vista tri-school area. Families would not be relocated, rather they would be displaced and likely, displaced outside of our community’s school district, which is within FHDA’s boundaries! Evicting future (and current) Foothill/De Anza students is wrong. There are no two-bedroom two-bath (2br/2ba) large complexes that retain all three schools. Following is a table of nearby large complexes with 2br/2ba that retain at least two schools.

3 Apartment
Complex
Name
Address 2br/2ba Rent*
Square Footage
Website
Assigned
School
(bold = change)
Miles
to
School
Terrace
FHDA
plans to buy
7954
McClellan
Rd
$3570 - $3720
1150 Sq Ft
https://prometheusapartments.com/
Lincoln
Kennedy
Monta Vista

0.4 mi

0.5 mi

0.5 mi
Glenbrook 10100
Mary Ave
$4395
1,065 Sq Ft
https://www.theglenbrookapartments.com/
Garden Gate
Lawson
Monta Vista
1 mi
2 mi

1.4 mi
Foothill
Heights
10210 N
Foothill
Blvd
$3850 - $3895
1050 Sq Ft
https://www.foothillheights.com/
Stevens
Kennedy
Monta Vista

0.9 mi

2.2 mi

1.8 mi
Sahara
Sands
7373
Fallenleaf
Lane
N/A
Only 2 Bedroom 1.5 Bath | 840 sq. ft.
https://saharasandsapts.com/

N/A N/A
Siena 7375
Rollingdell
Dr
$3295
1016 Sq Ft
https://siena.eprodesse.com/
Lincoln
Lawson
Monta Vista

1.8 mi

2.2 mi

2.0 mi
Villages 20875
Valley
Green Dr
$4050 - $4175 (3 br; 2 br only have 1 bath)
1141 Sq Ft
https://www.villagesatcupertino.com/
West Valley
Cupertino
Monta Vista

1.9 mi

2.4 mi

2.2 mi
*Rents were found either on apartment website or apartments.com, many have no vacancy

Is this a bad real estate deal? The apartment complex is very old; it was built in 1971. There’s a reason why rents are lower there than elsewhere in Cupertino in spite of its proximity to the tri- school area. Prometheus acquired the property in 2022 and has a net assessed value of $52M, per Santa Clara County Assessor Records. FHDA proposes to purchase the property for $67M and remodel it for $28M for a total of nearly $100M. Is spending $100M on a property that was assessed at half that three years ago a good deal?
There are better solutions for our FHDA students. Having student housing on the De Anza College campus near Stevens Creek would be closer to the college, closer to public transportation, and closer to shopping. And the College’s surveys indicated that students preferred to be on campus. There are large open areas on the campus’ 112 acres and the college would be able to build a building to modern safety and environmental standards that would meet the exact needs of the student population.

Alternatively, the 123-room Aloft Hotel on 10165 North De Anza Boulevard is delinquent in its mortgage and is facing foreclosure. Its valuation is under $40M. Because the local hotels are under financial stress, it is unlikely to be purchased by a hotel. To wit, the construction of two new Cupertino hotels (near Goodyear Tire and at Vallco Village’s Duke of Edinburgh) have been shelved indefinitely. Aloft is just 1 mile from De Anza’s bookstore as compared with 1.2 miles from the Terrace Apartments. The Aloft Hotel is relatively new; it was built in 2013 and is forty years younger than the Terrace Apartments. A few rooms could be converted to communal kitchens as are found in dormitories, the restaurant downstairs could be leased to a local operator, and meeting areas could be converted to study halls. Converting hotels for dormitory use is not a 4 new idea – San Jose State University converted a portion of the Signia Hilton (formerly Fairmont) into housing.

In previous Board Meetings, concerns were raised about the cost of providing security for on- campus housing. Does that mean that the College District intends to pass the expense to the residents of Cupertino? This is another impact that we did not anticipate when voting for the bond. By comparison, San Jose State University provides additional security to its off-campus housing at Spartan Village on the Paseo. The Terrace apartments are laid out in multiple buildings which is not optimal for providing security for its residents. And what about the impacts to neighboring single-family homes? We all know that the exuberance of youth invites more noise. A new building on campus or the hotel site are better suited to provide for security.

College District staff should have anticipated these issues prior to initiating an offer to purchase the Terrace Apartments. On March 10, staff proposed making trips to California community colleges that offer student housing. Why didn’t staff learn about how student housing long ago? And why is staff considering a junket to community colleges that are far away and in lower- density lower-cost areas when we have San Jose State in our own back yard? Cupertino individual median income is about $118K; eight California community college cities have individual median incomes of $28K to $36K; and the six other California community college cities have individual median incomes of $48K to $54K. There is no comparison.

Why wasn’t there any outreach to the major stakeholders – City of Cupertino, K-12 school districts, apartment residents and their single-family home neighbors? While the consultant is talking about the minutiae of filling in the apartment’s swimming pool, the major issues are not being addressed – security, ratio of resident assistants to residents, cost-of-rent, impact on community. Why is the College District ignoring its own surveys and not building student housing on campus when the funds have been available since 2020? Within a few minutes of due-diligence the College District’s consultant would have known that initiating the purchase of the Terrace apartments was a bad idea. Please don’t throw good money after bad and stop the purchase process now.

Sincerely, Rhoda Fry, 40+ year Cupertino resident
Further Information:

Full Bond Text:
https://go.boarddocs.com/ca/fhda/Board.nsf/files/BJ52PW03336F/$file/Resolution_No_2019- 36_Ordering_Election.pdf

San Jose Spotlight Article on McClellan Terrace:
https://sanjosespotlight.com/silicon-valley-foothill-de-anza-community-college-district-to-add- student-housing/

5 CBS News: Cupertino apartment residents stunned after complex set to become student housing:
https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/cupertino-mclellan-apartments-sold-foothill-de- anza-student-housing-residents-move/
County Assessor:
https://www.sccassessor.org/
SV@home Income & Rent Limits in Santa Clara County:
https://siliconvalleyathome.org/resources/finding-affordable-housing/

Aloft Hotel facing foreclosure:
https://www.siliconvalley.com/2025/01/08/cupertino-apple-tech-property-south-bay-hotel- economy-travel-build/

ABC News: San Jose State University transforms historic luxury hotel into college dorms:
https://abc7news.com/post/san-jose-state-university-transforms-historic-luxury-hotel-college- dorm-rooms/15191678/

San Jose State Spartan Village describes security concerns:
https://www.sjsu.edu/housing/housing-options/our-buildings/svp/index.php

Foothill/De Anza College Crime Reports
https://police.fhda.edu/_resources-top-
menu/security_reports/2024%20FHDA%20Annual%20Security%20Report%20Final%20v2.pdf March 10 Foothill/De Anza College Board Meeting:

Agenda and documents https://go.boarddocs.com/ca/fhda/Board.nsf/Public March 10, 2025 meeting on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/live/XorJDacQ6Vs

From: Rhoda Fry
To: City Clerk; City Council
Subject: 4/15/2025 Oral Communications
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:03:49 PM
Attachments: FHDA LETTER.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council,

Terrace has 5.4 acres (proposed to sell for $12.4M per acre). Prometheus paid $52M for a complex that was in much poorer condition than it had expected and is hoping to sell at $67M.

Please use any and all measures possible to prevent this significant change-in-use.

Regards,
Rhoda
From: Peggy Griffin
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: 2025-04-15 City Council Meeting - ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 2:38:02 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

PLEASE INCLUDE THIS EMAIL AS PART OF WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE ABOVE MEETING AGENDA ITEM.

Dear Mayor Chao, Vice Mayor Moore and Councilmembers,

There are several items not on the agenda that I would like to bring to your attention:

1-Please stop requiring people to indicate that they want their emails included as part of written communications. We are lucky to have people wanting to send in their comments. Do not add barriers to having their voices heard.

2-Please return all commissions to the hybrid meetings and return them to their original locations.

3-Please discuss SB 79 as soon as possible and send a letter opposing it!

Sincerely,
Peggy Griffin
From: S B
To: City Council; City Clerk; City Attorney"s Office; Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject: Topics not on the agenda
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 2:12:26 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the city clerk and City Council
Please include the following email as part of Written communications for the City Council meeting of April 15th 2025.

To the Mayor, Vice Mayor and council members,
I request that the City Council consider adopting the following procedural changes regarding the handling of written communications and commission meetings.

Written Communications:

Either in 2022/2023, the majority on the then Council—comprising JR Fruen, Sheila Mohan, and Hung Wei—implemented a change requiring residents to explicitly request that their written communications be included in the public record. While this may have been done with procedural intent, it has unfortunately had the effect of limiting public voices and reducing transparency.

In a healthy democracy, open communication between residents and their elected representatives is essential. Written comments from the public are a vital part of civic engagement and should be treated with the same respect as in-person testimony. Requiring residents to add a specific statement to ensure their voices are included in the public record creates an unnecessary barrier to participation.

I urge the Council to reverse this policy and restore the default practice of including all written communications in the public record—unless the sender explicitly requests otherwise. Doing so would demonstrate the City’s commitment to transparency, accountability, and inclusive public dialogue.

Commission meetings:

In 2022, citing logistical or operational reasons, all commission meetings—except for the Planning Commission—were moved to the Quinlan Community Center, removed from the hybrid format, and, at times, not even recorded. While meetings are now recorded, public participation requires in-person attendance, and some of the rooms used at Quinlan are often too small to accommodate residents effectively.

These changes have significantly reduced transparency and public engagement. During this period, the conduct of a former commissioner raised serious concerns about a lack of accountability—concerns that were brought to the attention of the City Manager but, unfortunately, not meaningfully addressed. This lack of oversight was particularly troubling given the absence of recording or broadcasting during that time.

While I am willing to provide further details about this matter separately, my primary request is that commission meetings be relocated back to Cupertino Community Hall and returned to a hybrid format. Doing so would provide adequate space, restore accessibility, and help ensure transparency, respectful conduct, and public trust in our civic processes.

Thank you for your attention and for supporting open, inclusive governance. regards
Sashi
From: S B
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; City Attorney"s Office; Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject: Re: Topics not on the agenda
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 10:21:10 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the City clerk and to council member Fruen,
Please include my email in written communications for the next City Council meeting! Not sure if you can include Your reply to me Council member Fruen for context! Council member Fruen,
Thank you for getting back to me so quickly and for explaining the City Council’s position on how written communications are handled under Section 2.08.100 of the Municipal Code.

With all the budget challenges Cupertino faced in 2022, it’s surprising that time was spent enforcing an obscure section of the Municipal Code that, although on the books since 1995, had never been enforced.

For decades, the lack of enforcement never caused any issues for the Council or the community.

I hope you can understand why—even if the Council didn’t formally change anything in 2022 or 2023— the way this rule is currently being applied has raised concerns among many in the community. While asking residents to include a sentence requesting their comments be added to the public record might seem like a small detail, it’s not something everyone is aware of. As a result, important input may be unintentionally excluded. Whether this change is due to a new interpretation or simply a shift in enforcement, it has made the process feel less open and accessible to the public.

Based on how the ordinance is written, it actually seems like relevant public comments should be included in the meeting materials automatically. So it would make more sense—and feel more transparent—to include them by default, unless the writer specifically states otherwise.

I request that the Council reconsider its approach and begin automatically including all relevant public comments in the record, without requiring residents to make a special request. regards
Sashi
.

On Apr 15, 2025, at 3:09 PM, J.R. Fruen <[email protected]> wrote:

Sashi,

Council took no action in 2022, 2023, or 2024 to limit public comment in the fashion you describe. Rather, the City Attorney’s office reviewed and began enforcing Section 2.08.100 of the Municipal Code, which is reproduced here below for your convenience. It has been part of the Municipal Code in its present form since 1995.

2.08.100 Written Communications.

1. Written communications transmitted to a majority of the members of the City Council by any person in connection with a matter which is subject to discussion or consideration at a meeting of the City Council shall be delivered by the recipient Councilperson to the City Clerk who shall retain them as public records and shall otherwise treat them as written communications to the City Council.

2. Written communications addressed to the City Council and delivered to the City Clerk shall be transmitted to each City Councilperson, the City Manager, and any department director having responsibility for the subject matter of the communication. Written communications which are relevant to a matter subject to being discussed or considered at a City Council meeting shall be included as supplementary material to that agendized matter. Other written communications may be placed on the agenda, as a separate item of business under written communications, by a Councilperson, City Manager or any department director having responsibility for the subject matter of the communication.
(Ord. 1697, (part), 1995; Ord. 673, (part), 1975; Ord. 389, § 3.6, 1968)

J.R. Fruen
Councilmember
City Council
[email protected]
(408)777-1316

From: S B <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 2:12 PM
To: City Council <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Attorney's Office <[email protected]>; Cupertino City Manager's Office <[email protected]>
Subject: Topics not on the agenda

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the city clerk and City Council
Please include the following email as part of Written communications for the City Council meeting of April 15th 2025.

Written Communications:

Either in 2022/2023, the majority on the then Council—comprising JR Fruen, Sheila Mohan, and Hung Wei— implemented a change requiring residents to explicitly request that their written communications be included in the public record. While this may have been done with procedural intent, it has unfortunately had the effect of limiting public voices and reducing transparency.

In a healthy democracy, open communication between residents and their elected representatives is essential.

Written comments from the public are a vital part of civic engagement and should be treated with the same respect as in-person testimony. Requiring residents to add a specific statement to ensure their voices are included in the public record creates an unnecessary barrier to participation.

Commission meetings:

While meetings are now recorded, public participation requires in-person attendance, and some of the rooms used at Quinlan are often too small to accommodate residents effectively.

Thank you for your attention and for supporting open, inclusive governance.

regards
Sashi
From: Santosh Rao
To: City Council; City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office; Chad Mosley; David Stillman Subject: Urgent Request to Reverse De Anza Boulevard Lane Reductions Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 4:37:59 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Clerk,
Can you please include the below in written comments for the 04/15/25 city council meeting. [Writing on behalf of myself only, as a Cupertino resident.] Subject: Urgent Request to Reverse De Anza Boulevard Lane Reductions Dear Mayor Liang Chao and Honorable Members of the Cupertino City Council, I write today to urge this Council to take bold and corrective action on the De Anza Boulevard lane reductions—a decision that has significantly impacted traffic flow and community safety, despite widespread public opposition and concerns raised during the prior council majority tenure.

I draw your attention to a recent article in SFGATE (linked below), which details how the City of San Mateo recently made the courageous choice to reverse a costly and disruptive bike lane project that had eliminated 200 parking spots. Despite the expense and need to return grant funding, their council prioritized the needs of residents and restored over 100 parking spaces. https://www.sfgate.com/local/article/bay-area-city-nearly-2-million-bike-lane-removal- 20149966.php
Cupertino now has a similar opportunity. Last fall, residents repeatedly voiced strong opposition to the removal of vehicle lanes on De Anza Boulevard. Yet, the prior council and staff moved forward regardless. At the time, transportation staff assured residents that traffic would not be impacted—claims which have not aged well.

Residents now face daily gridlock, especially during peak hours. East-west and left-turn traffic is particularly burdened, with right-turn lanes such as the one on McClellan Road backing up all the way to Stelling Road. Additionally, it appears that signal timing for left-turns has been shortened, causing more drivers to rush through red lights—raising both safety and enforcement concerns. This change seems to prioritize north-south traffic flow at the expense of all others.

At a prior community meeting, I asked what modeling or testing had been done to assess the impact on east-west traffic. The answer was: none. I urge the Council to investigate what specific signal timing changes have been implemented on De Anza and direct staff to restore timings that allow left-turn lanes to fully clear before the lights turn red.

Moreover, the new bike lanes on De Anza Blvd remain underutilized. Despite driving in the area frequently, I rarely observe any cyclists using these lanes. This raises critical questions about how staff is evaluating the effectiveness of such projects:

Are bike lane sensors installed to count usage by day and time? If not, why not?
How is the city measuring the return on investment (ROI) of these major capital projects?
Until there are clear, data-driven metrics and a transparent ROI analysis subject to public review, I respectfully request that the Council immediately pause all new bike lane spending and approvals. I also recommend that a study session be scheduled where staff must present quantifiable usage data and cost-benefit analysis to the council for comment and scrutiny.

Given that the city has already spent over $500,000 on the De Anza lane reduction, that expenditure should now be offset by pausing or canceling all current and future bike lane projects and intersection changes.

Finally, this raises a broader question of accountability. How will Council ensure that staff and leadership are held accountable for the clear and costly failure of the De Anza Boulevard lane reduction? Residents deserve not only a reversal of the physical changes, but also a firm commitment to more transparent, data-driven, accountable and responsive governance moving forward.

Now is the time to act decisively. Please restore the fourth vehicle lanes on De Anza Boulevard and set a new standard for listening to residents, using metrics, and demanding accountability.

Respectfully,
San Rao (Writing on behalf of myself only, as a Cupertino resident) From: Devendar Reddy
To: City Clerk; City Council; Benjamin Fu; Pamela Wu
Subject: Oral communication Re: Request for Urgency Ordinance or Interim Moratorium to Protect Existing Rental Housing Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 6:00:31 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please add to oral communication for todays meeting 04/15. >
>
Mayor Liang Chao
> Vice-Mayor Kitty Moore
> Members of the Cupertino City Council
> Cupertino City Hall
> 10300 Torre Avenue
> Cupertino, CA 95014
>
>
> Dear Mayor Chao, Vice-Mayor Moore, and Members of the Cupertino City Council:
>
> I am writing to respectfully urge the Cupertino City Council to adopt an urgency ordinance or interim moratorium at the next City Council meeting that prohibits the conversion of existing multifamily rental housing in Cupertino to student housing or other non-residential uses. The intent of this request is to safeguard the city’s current rental housing stock during a time of increasing pressure and changing land use demands. >
> As Cupertino faces growing demand for both affordable housing and student accommodations, it is critical that the city prioritize policies that protect its existing rental units—many of which are home to young families with school-aged children, seniors, and others in need of stable, affordable housing. Allowing multifamily rental properties to be converted into student housing or other uses risks displacing current residents and exacerbating our housing affordability crisis.
>
>
> Several California cities, including San Francisco, Berkeley, and Santa Clara, have implemented measures to protect their rental housing stock from similar conversions. San Francisco’s Municipal Code Section 317 is one such example, requiring specific zoning and permit processes before rental units can be converted. These types of policies have helped cities maintain neighborhood stability while still allowing thoughtful expansion of housing options. >
> Cupertino’s rental housing is essential for maintaining the diversity, equity, and vibrancy of our community.

Given the rapid shifts in housing demand and the pressing need to preserve affordability, Cupertino must take a proactive stance to prevent the loss of its existing multifamily rental housing stock. >
> I therefore urge the City Council to act swiftly by passing an urgency ordinance or interim moratorium that will prevent conversions of rental housing to student housing or other non-residential uses until a permanent municipal code amendment can be studied and adopted. This action will allow the City time to fully evaluate the issue and consider appropriate long-term regulations.
>
> This matter is time-sensitive. Existing properties such as McClellan Terrace are at immediate risk of conversion.

We must act now to ensure that Cupertino does not lose essential rental housing that supports families, workers, and long-time community members.
>
> Most urgently, I appeal to you on behalf of the 67 families with children enrolled in CUSD and FUHSD schools who currently live at McClellan Terrace. These are families who have built their lives in our community—who contribute to our schools, our neighborhoods, and our local economy. Their potential displacement would not only harm their wellbeing but would also undermine the very fabric of Cupertino. Please act to protect them. >
> Thank you for your attention to this critical issue. I look forward to seeing this item placed on the next City Council agenda for urgent consideration and action.
>
> Sincerely,
> Devendar
CC 04-15-2025
Item No. 4
Presentation by Santa
Clara Fire Department
Written Communications
Updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone
Map in the LRA
Santa Clara County Fire Department
Assistant Chief, Hector Estrada
Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area Government Code 51178
The State Fire Marshal shall identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors including areas where winds have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread.

LRA - L ocal Responsi bi l i ty A reas : I ncl udes i ncorporated ci ti es and urban re g io ns whe re lo c a l g o ve rnm e nt ha s wild fire re s p o ns ib ility.

S RA - State Responsi bi l i ty A reas: State has f i nanci al responsi bi l i ty f or wi l dl and f i re protecti on and preventi on.

FHSZ - Fi re Hazard Severi ty Zones : Desi gnati on of an area by State Fi re Marshal based on severi ty of f i re hazard expected to prevai l i n that area.

LRA Map Rollout Timeline
Sent to local governments
February 24, 2025 - Maps Released
Posting Deadline (30 Days) - March 25, 2025
Adoption Deadline by local (120 Days) - June 24, 2025

Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ)
Fire Hazard
❑ “Hazard” is based on the physical
conditions that create a likelihood and
expected fire behavior over a 30 to 50-year
period without considering mitigation
measures such as home hardening, recent
wildfire,
or fuel reduction efforts

Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ)
Wildfire Risk
❑ “Risk” is the potential damage a fire
can do to the area under existing
conditions, accounting for any
modifications such as fuel reduction
projects, defensible space, and ignition
resistant building construction.

Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ)
Map Development
❑ Completed on December 1, 2024
❑Approximately 450 jurisdictions (M, H, VH)
❑2007 – Over 200 jurisdictions in Very High FHSZ
❑ Developed LRA jurisdictional Maps for
Cities and Counties and statewide LRA
data

Current
2025
2007
2025
Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ)
Gov. Code 51179
❑ A local agency shall not decrease the level
of fire hazard severity zone as identified by
the State Fire Marshal for any area within
the jurisdiction of the local agency, and, in
exercising its discretion pursuant to
paragraph (2), may only increase the level
of fire hazard severity zone as identified by
the State Fire Marshal for any area within
the jurisdiction of the local agency.

Concerns & Questions
Science and Methodology
V i si t CA L FI RE to l earn understand the process and how i t evol ved. FHSZ Model on CA L FI RE si te Fi re Hazard Severi ty Zone Rol l out - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy8X3BCreXY Finding or Retaining Insurance
C DI - I nsurance Commissioner - Ri cardo L ara
https://www.insurance.ca.gov/01-consumers/200-wrr/
I nsurance compani es use Ri sk model s not Hazard model s that take i nto consi derati on short term f actors not i ncl uded i n hazard m o d e ling .

S a fe r fro m wild fire link -https://www.insurance.ca.gov/01- consumers/200 -wrr/Saf er-from-Wild fire s .c fm Costly Home Upgrades (Home Hardening)
L earn to protect your home from di rect fl ame, radi ant heat, fl yi ng embers.

Low-cost retrofitting list (CDI)
https://readyforwi l dfi re.org/prepare -for-wild fire /ha rd e ning-your-home/ What does it mean - In a FHSZ
Building standards - CBC Chapter 7A
Natural Hazard Real Estate Disclosure - AB 38
100 foot Defensible Space requirements - CA GOV 51182
Property Development Standards (MFSR) - CA PRC 4290
City and County General Plan - CA GOV 65302
Create a FireWise Community
Thank you
Questions?
Links
Finding or Retaining Insurance
https://www.insurance.ca.gov/01-consumers/200-wrr/Safer-from-Wildfires.cfm Fire Hazard Severity Zones & FAQs
https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/fire-hazard-severity-zones History of Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps CAL FIRE - Ready for Wildfire https://readyforwildfire.org/prepare-for-wildfire/
Fire Hazard Severity Zone Rollout
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy8X3BCreXY
Low-cost retrofitting list
https://readyforwildfire.org/prepare-for-wildfire/hardening-your-home/ What
Enforced now

CC 04-15-2025
Item No. 8
Rolling Hills 4-H Club
Written Communications
/0/1/2/2/3/4/5/i255/7/3/2/2/8/i255/9/10/7/i255/11/2/12/13/i255/1/14/i255/11/12/15/16/17/18/3/4/1 /19/4/20/3/17/1/4/21/16/4/18/22/2/i255/23/18/16/24/22/17/25/8/26/3/15/i255/27/17/1/28/16/29/18 /30/15/17/3/2/i255/31/32/33/i255/34/35/34/32
/36/37/38/39/37/40/39/41/i255/43/44/43/36/i255/45/46 /47/48/49/49/50/51/52/i255/53/50/49/49/54/i255/36/55/53/i255/55/i255/56/57/58/59/60/61/50/51/48/i255/56/50/61/62/i255/56/48/57/51/63/50/49/i255/45/60/59/54/59/51/61/64/61/50/48/51 /65/61/61/58/54/44/37/37/66/66/66/67/63/64/51/68/64/67/63/48/69/37/70/59/54/50/52/51/37/71/72/73/65/66/74/75/63/76/73/63/37/77/50/78/47/69/70/38/79/80/76/76/46/81/70/59/82/83/81/81/56/84/85/37/68/50/59/66/86/57/61/69/78/63/48/51/61/59/51/61/87/71/72/73/65/66/74/75/63/76/73/63/88/57/61/69/78/63/64/69/58/64/50/52/51/87/54/65/64/60/59/78/62/48/57/60/78/70/59/54/50/52/51/88/57/61/69/78/69/59/70/50/57/69/87/49/50/51/89/40/88/57/61/69/78/54/48/57/60/63/59/87/54/65/64/60/59/62/48/57/60/70/59/54/50/52/51/90/38 /37/38 /0/1/2/3/i255/5/6/i255/7/8/1/9
/10/11/12/i255/14/15/i255/16/17/18/19/14/20/21/22/15/i255/23/21/19/24/18/15/25/i255/26/27/28/25/29 /30/18/31/18/23/27/32/17/18/33/25/i255/27/19/24/21/33/14/34/21/25/14/27/33/i255/15/18/19/31/14/33/24/i255/27/31/18/19/i255/35 /17/14/23/23/14/27/33/i255/26/27/28/25/29/i255
/36/17/32/27/37/18/19/15/i255/38/14/30/15/i255/21/24/18/15/i255/39/11/40/41/i255/25/27/i255/42/28/14/23/30/i255/23/14/43/18 /15/38/14/23/23/15/i255/42/26/i255/23/18/21/30/14/33/24/i255/29/21/33/30/15/11/27/33/i255/32/19/27/44/18/20/25/15/i255/14/33/i255/21 /31/21/19/14/18/25/26/i255/27/43/i255/21/19/18/21/15/i255/23/14/38/18/i255/15/20/14/18/33/20/18/45/i255/29/18/21/23/25/29/45 /21/24/19/14/20/28/23/25/28/19/18/45/i255/21/33/30/i255/20/14/31/14/20/i255/18/33/24/21/24/18/17/18/33/25 /46/47/48/49/47/50/49/51/i255/53/54/53/49/i255/55/56 /57/58/59/59/60/61/62/i255/63/60/59/59/64/i255/46/65/63/i255/65/i255/66/67/68/69/70/71/60/61/58/i255/66/60/71/72/i255/66/58/67/61/73/60/59/i255/55/70/69/64/69/61/71/74/71/60/58/61 /75/71/71/68/64/54/47/47/76/76/76/77/73/74/61/78/74/77/73/58/79/47/80/69/64/60/62/61/47/81/82/83/75/76/84/85/73/86/83/73/47/87/60/88/57/79/80/48/89/90/86/86/56/91/80/69/92/93/91/91/66/94/95/47/78/60/69/76/96/67/71/79/88/73/58/61/71/69/61/71/97/81/82/83/75/76/84/85/73/86/83/73/98/67/71/79/88/73/74/79/68/74/60/62/61/97/64/75/74/70/69/88/72/58/67/70/88/80/69/64/60/62/61/98/67/71/79/88/79/69/80/60/67/79/97/59/60/61/99/50/98/67/71/79/88/64/58/67/70/73/69/97/64/75/74/70/69/72/58/67/70/80/69/64/60/62/61/100/48/47/48 /0/1/2/3/4/5/6/i255/8/9/10/i255/11/12/13/14/i255/15/16/i255/17/1/16/6/1/i255/11/12/1/2/1/i255/11/18/13/16/6/19 /20/18/13/16/21/4/21/i255/15/16/i255/22/23/24/22/25/i255/16/18/26/i255/22/27/27/28/i255/29/4/29/14/4/2/5 /30/31/32/32/33/34/35/i255/37/33/32/32/38/i255/39/40/37 /41/32/42/43/i255/31/44/i255/41/42/45/46/30/47/33/34/31 /48/49/50/51/49/52/51/53/i255/55/56/55/51/i255/57/58 /59/60/61/61/62/63/64/i255/65/62/61/61/66/i255/48/67/65/i255/67/i255/68/69/70/71/72/73/62/63/60/i255/68/62/73/74/i255/68/60/69/63/75/62/61/i255/57/72/71/66/71/63/73/76/73/62/60/63 /77/73/73/70/66/56/49/49/78/78/78/79/75/76/63/80/76/79/75/60/81/49/82/71/66/62/64/63/49/83/84/85/77/78/86/87/75/88/85/75/49/89/62/90/59/81/82/50/91/92/88/88/58/93/82/71/94/95/93/93/68/96/97/49/80/62/71/78/98/69/73/81/90/75/60/63/73/71/63/73/99/83/84/85/77/78/86/87/75/88/85/75/100/69/73/81/90/75/76/81/70/76/62/64/63/99/66/77/76/72/71/90/74/60/69/72/90/82/71/66/62/64/63/100/69/73/81/90/81/71/82/62/69/81/99/61/62/63/101/52/100/69/73/81/90/66/60/69/72/75/71/99/66/77/76/72/71/74/60/69/72/82/71/66/62/64/63/102/50/49/50 /0/1/i255/3/4/4/1/5/i255/6/7/1/i255/8/3/9/6/i255/10/5/3/11/1/12/6/9/i255/13/14/i255/6/7/1 /12/3/15/14/6/16/17/4/5/3/8/i255/18/3/15/19/6/5/16/20/i255/21/1/1 /22/1/1/10/13/14/23/20/i255/24/14/25/i255/26/19/10/24/12/24/9/i255/6/3/i255/27/12/13/1/14/12/1 /28/13/6/1/5/24/12/16/20/i255/29/13/9/7/13/14/23/20/i255/29/3/3/25/i255/24/14/25 /30/15/6/5/13/6/13/3/14/20/i255/24/14/25/i255/31/14/32/13/5/3/14/8/1/14/6/24/19 /27/6/1/33/24/5/25/9/7/13/10/34
/35/36/37/37/38/39/40/i255/42/38/37/37/43/i255/44/45/42 /46/37/47/48/i255/36/49/i255/46/47/50/51/35/52/38/39/36 /53/54/55/56/54/57/56/58/i255/60/61/60/62/i255/63/64 /65/66/67/67/68/69/70/i255/71/68/67/67/72/i255/53/73/71/i255/73/i255/74/75/76/77/78/79/68/69/66/i255/74/68/79/80/i255/74/66/75/69/81/68/67/i255/63/78/77/72/77/69/79/82/79/68/66/69 /83/79/79/76/72/61/54/54/84/84/84/85/81/82/69/86/82/85/81/66/87/54/88/77/72/68/70/69/54/89/90/91/83/84/92/93/81/94/91/81/54/95/68/96/65/87/88/55/97/98/94/94/64/99/88/77/100/101/99/99/74/102/103/54/86/68/77/84/104/75/79/87/96/81/66/69/79/77/69/79/105/89/90/91/83/84/92/93/81/94/91/81/106/75/79/87/96/81/82/87/76/82/68/70/69/105/72/83/82/78/77/96/80/66/75/78/96/88/77/72/68/70/69/106/75/79/87/96/87/77/88/68/75/87/105/67/68/69/107/57/106/75/79/87/96/72/66/75/78/81/77/105/72/83/82/78/77/80/66/75/78/88/77/72/68/70/69/108/55/54/55 /0/1/2/3/4/3/5/6/7/8/i255/10/1/3/11/12/13/1/i255/14/3/5/15/1/13/16/10 /17/18/5/19/1/20/12/3/10/16/21/i255/20/2/19/12/22/23/i255/24/12/11/12/7/25/i255/26/3/1/1/21 /1/16/13/27/28
/20/3/1/1/i255/19/5/7/16/29/22/23/i255/30/13/31/22/1/22/22/2/7/i255/32/2/7/13/29 /16/5/6/3/10/i255/5/14/1/7/i255/16/5/i255/16/29/1/i255/14/6/33/22/12/13 /34/35/36/36/37/38/39/i255/41/37/36/36/42/i255/43/44/41 /45/36/46/47/i255/35/48/i255/45/46/49/50/34/51/37/38/35 /52/53/54/55/53/56/55/57/i255/59/60/59/61/i255/62/63 /64/65/66/66/67/68/69/i255/70/67/66/66/71/i255/52/72/70/i255/72/i255/73/74/75/76/77/78/67/68/65/i255/73/67/78/79/i255/73/65/74/68/80/67/66/i255/62/77/76/71/76/68/78/81/78/67/65/68 /82/78/78/75/71/60/53/53/83/83/83/84/80/81/68/85/81/84/80/65/86/53/87/76/71/67/69/68/53/88/89/90/82/83/91/92/80/93/90/80/53/94/67/95/64/86/87/54/96/97/93/93/63/98/87/76/99/100/98/98/73/101/102/53/85/67/76/83/103/74/78/86/95/80/65/68/78/76/68/78/104/88/89/90/82/83/91/92/80/93/90/80/105/74/78/86/95/80/81/86/75/81/67/69/68/104/71/82/81/77/76/95/79/65/74/77/95/87/76/71/67/69/68/105/74/78/86/95/86/76/87/67/74/86/104/66/67/68/106/56/105/74/78/86/95/71/65/74/77/80/76/104/71/82/81/77/76/79/65/74/77/87/76/71/67/69/68/107/54/53/54 /0/1/2/3/4/5/1/6/0/1/7/8/9
/10/7/0/11/8/4/12/10/13/3/14/i255/14/4/5/16/0/17/7
/4/18/19/20/21/22/23/24/25/i255/13/26/27/23/20/26/20/19/i255/26/20/i255/6/28/17/29/18/29/29/26/24/i255/4/26/24/28/30 /31/32/33/34/35/36/37/33/i255/39/37/40/41/42/i255/40/43/44/37/45/46/33/47/i255/46/33/45/32/35/46/45/43/35/48 /49/50/32/33/51/46/33/47/i255/33/32/51/46/45/43/35
/52/32/40/51/33/43/40/35/53/46/49/i255/39/46/51/53/i255/50/37/54/32/50/i255/33/37/33/36/49/40/37/55/46/51/48 /56/40/32/35/35/40/37/37/51/35/i255/57/54/37/50/37/47/58 /59/37/54/60/35/i255/37/33/i255/61/46/37/34/46/45/43/40/35/46/51/58/48/i255/39/32/51/43/40/35/53/43/34/i255/53/43/32/50/51/53 /62/63/64/65/63/66/65/67/i255/69/70/69/71/i255/72/73 /74/75/76/76/77/78/79/i255/80/77/76/76/81/i255/62/82/80/i255/82/i255/83/84/85/86/87/88/77/78/75/i255/83/77/88/89/i255/83/75/84/78/90/77/76/i255/72/87/86/81/86/78/88/91/88/77/75/78 /92/88/88/85/81/70/63/63/93/93/93/94/90/91/78/95/91/94/90/75/96/63/97/86/81/77/79/78/63/98/99/100/92/93/101/102/90/103/100/90/63/104/77/105/74/96/97/64/106/107/103/103/73/108/97/86/109/110/108/108/83/111/112/63/95/77/86/93/113/84/88/96/105/90/75/78/88/86/78/88/114/98/99/100/92/93/101/102/90/103/100/90/115/84/88/96/105/90/91/96/85/91/77/79/78/114/81/92/91/87/86/105/89/75/84/87/105/97/86/81/77/79/78/115/84/88/96/105/96/86/97/77/84/96/114/76/77/78/116/66/115/84/88/96/105/81/75/84/87/90/86/114/81/92/91/87/86/89/75/84/87/97/86/81/77/79/78/117/64/63/64 /0/1/2/3/4/5/1/6/0/1/7/8/9
/10/7/0/11/8/4/12/10/13/3/14/i255/14/4/5/16/0/17/7
/18/19/20/21/19/22/21/23/i255/25/26/25/27/i255/28/29 /30/31/32/32/33/34/35/i255/36/33/32/32/37/i255/18/38/36/i255/38/i255/39/40/41/42/43/44/33/34/31/i255/39/33/44/45/i255/39/31/40/34/46/33/32/i255/28/43/42/37/42/34/44/47/44/33/31/34 /48/44/44/41/37/26/19/19/49/49/49/50/46/47/34/51/47/50/46/31/52/19/53/42/37/33/35/34/19/54/55/56/48/49/57/58/46/59/56/46/19/60/33/61/30/52/53/20/62/63/59/59/29/64/53/42/65/66/64/64/39/67/68/19/51/33/42/49/69/40/44/52/61/46/31/34/44/42/34/44/70/54/55/56/48/49/57/58/46/59/56/46/71/40/44/52/61/46/47/52/41/47/33/35/34/70/37/48/47/43/42/61/45/31/40/43/61/53/42/37/33/35/34/71/40/44/52/61/52/42/53/33/40/52/70/32/33/34/72/22/71/40/44/52/61/37/31/40/43/46/42/70/37/48/47/43/42/45/31/40/43/53/42/37/33/35/34/73/20 /19/20 /0/1/2/3/i255/5/6/5/7/8/9/8/i255/10/5/11/11/12/i255/10/13/14/14/13/6 /15/13/1/16/8/5/3/17/13/16/18/2/i255/19/20/21/22/23/23/i255/24/13/14/14/17/16/5/3/13/7/i255/25/7/5/16/3/26 /i255/28/29/30/31/32/30/33/i255/34/29/35/35/36/37/38/34/i255/30/39/38/32/40/41/i255/35/42/39/30/38/34/43 /34/32/33/30/34/i255/44/i255/45/39/37/41
/46/47/48/49/50/51/47/52/46/47/53/54/55
/56/53/46/57/54/50/58/56/10/49/24/i255/24/50/51/0/46/59/53 /60/61/62/63/61/64/63/65/i255/67/68/67/69/i255/70/71 /72/73/74/74/75/76/77/i255/78/75/74/74/79/i255/60/80/78/i255/80/i255/81/82/83/84/85/86/75/76/73/i255/81/75/86/87/i255/81/73/82/76/88/75/74/i255/70/85/84/79/84/76/86/89/86/75/73/76 /90/86/86/83/79/68/61/61/91/91/91/92/88/89/76/93/89/92/88/73/94/61/95/84/79/75/77/76/61/96/97/98/90/91/99/100/88/101/98/88/61/102/75/103/72/94/95/62/104/105/101/101/71/106/95/84/69/107/106/106/81/108/109/61/93/75/84/91/110/82/86/94/103/88/73/76/86/84/76/86/111/96/97/98/90/91/99/100/88/101/98/88/112/82/86/94/103/88/89/94/83/89/75/77/76/111/79/90/89/85/84/103/87/73/82/85/103/95/84/79/75/77/76/112/82/86/94/103/94/84/95/75/82/94/111/74/75/76/113/64/112/82/86/94/103/79/73/82/85/88/84/111/79/90/89/85/84/87/73/82/85/95/84/79/75/77/76/114/62/61/62 /9/10/11/11/12/13/14/i255/16/12/11/11/17/i255/18/19/16
/20/21/22/23/21/24/23/25/i255/27/28/27/29/i255/30/31 /32/33/34/34/35/36/37/i255/38/35/34/34/39/i255/20/40/38/i255/40/i255/41/42/43/44/45/46/35/36/33/i255/41/35/46/47/i255/41/33/42/36/48/35/34/i255/30/45/44/39/44/36/46/49/46/35/33/36 /50/46/46/43/39/28/21/21/51/51/51/52/48/49/36/53/49/52/48/33/54/21/55/44/39/35/37/36/21/56/57/58/50/51/59/60/48/61/58/48/21/62/35/63/32/54/55/22/64/65/61/61/31/66/55/44/29/67/66/66/41/68/69/21/53/35/44/51/70/42/46/54/63/48/33/36/46/44/36/46/71/56/57/58/50/51/59/60/48/61/58/48/72/42/46/54/63/48/49/54/43/49/35/37/36/71/39/50/49/45/44/63/47/33/42/45/63/55/44/39/35/37/36/72/42/46/54/63/54/44/55/35/42/54/71/34/35/36/73/24/72/42/46/54/63/39/33/42/45/48/44/71/39/50/49/45/44/47/33/42/45/55/44/39/35/37/36/74/22 /21/22 CC 04-15-2025
Item No. 10

Ratifying Accounts
Payable for the periods
ending March 14, 2025 &
March 28, 2025
Written Communications
From: Griffin
To: City Council; Kristina Alfaro
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: 2025-04-15 City Council Meeting-ITEM 10 Accounts Payables-PLEASE PULL Date: Wednesday, April 9, 2025 11:18:36 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

PLEASE INCLUDE THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS AS PART IF WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE ABOVE AGENDA ITEM.

Dear Mayor Chao, Vice Mayor Moore, Councilmembers and Staff, Please PULL CONSENT ITEM 1O Accounts Payables.

In Attachment B, Page 24 of 36 there is a $12.1M payment to BAZ Industries which we all know is Apple’s sales tax kick back program. $12.1M is a lot of money to squirrel away without any visibility.

Q1: How was this accounted for in the budgets for the years it was being accumulated/covering? Q2: Where does it show up in the budget as being allocated but not spent yet? Was it placed in a fund? Q3: The payment shows it came from the General Fund. There is a lot of money in the General Fund. What is the current breakdown of the General Fund? Sincerely,
Peggy Griffin
From: Rhoda Fry
To: City Clerk; City Council
Subject: 4/15/2025 Agenda Item #10 Accounts Payable
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 2:39:49 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council,

The A/P report contains payments to BAZ that pertain to Q1 Calendar Year 2023.

Can the City Council please ask for a financial report exactly as to what has happened with the money?
When we are looking at paying out $12.1M, that’s a huge portion of our budget.

How has this money been carried over as a liability over the years?

Separately, can we please have a final report on the CDTFA tax money? At first some was set aside. And then some more. Did it or did it not include the liability to BAZ?
Then we found out that we would be able to keep the money – but where was that liability being recorded?
Now we see that the money is being paid out of the general fund, can we see a trail as to how the money got into the general fund?

Thanks,
Rhoda Fry
CC 04-15-2025
Item No. 12
FY 2025-25 Community
Development Block Grant,

BMR, AHF, HSG, PLHA
Written Communications
From: Tracy K
To: City Council; City Clerk
Subject: 4/15 City Council Meeting Written Comments -- Agenda Item 12 (Consent) Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 3:17:34 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council & Staff,
Below is my written comment for consent agenda item 12 -- Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, Below Market Rate Affordable Housing Fund (BMR AHF), General Fund Human Services Grant (HSG), Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA), and County funding allocations.

As context, the current recommendation is to authorize the City Manager to execute the FY 2025-26 CDBG, BMR AHF, General Fund HSG, PLHA, and County funding agreements, whose amounts were originally proposed by staff and then modified by the Housing Commission.

Questions:

1. Should almost 40% of our BMR AHF Capital Housing Project Funds go to one project?

2. If we award $3M, leaving only $1.8M in the BMR AHF fund, with $350K committed to administration/services, is $1.45M enough for future affordable housing projects? How much is forecasted to enter the fund in the next 2 years?

3. How can we be more consistent around the way we are awarding funding per unit? The Mary Ave project (40 units) is currently recommended to receive 16x more per unit than the Wolfe Road Housing project (249 units).

Originally, staff's BMR AHF Capital Housing Fund allocation recommendation to the Housing Commission was $2M to Wolfe Road or $8,032 / unit and $1M to Mary Ave or $25,000 / unit. Then, the Housing Commission flipped the funding allocations to $1,083,200.00 to the Wolfe Road Project ($4,350 / unit) versus $1,916,800.00 to the Mary Ave Housing project ($47,920 / unit). Regardless of whose recommendation one takes, this is a pretty wide discrepancy in funding per unit.

This discrepancy in funding per unit widens further when we take into account the awarding of 2021-25 PLHA Affordable Rental Housing Funds (Four-Year Funding Cycle). This funding was originally recommended by staff to be split: $300K to Wolfe Road and $608,683 to Mary Ave. After going past the Housing Commission, the recommendation shifted towards giving all $908,683 to Mary Ave, increasing Mary Ave's funding to $70,637 per unit.

With the high cost of construction, public sector funding and support is critical to making low- income housing a reality. However, we must have a sustainable framework for awarding this funding. Whenever we award funding, we are setting precedents for future applications.

Cupertino must distribute funds in a way that is justifiable and repeatable in the future. I may be wrong, but I imagine it is not sustainable to award $70K per unit grants to all applicants. As such, are we being fair and equitable in this current approach to awarding funding? Many thanks,
Tracy
From: Kirsten Squarcia
To: J.R. Fruen
Cc: Kirsten Squarcia; Pamela Wu; City Clerk
Subject: FW:

Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 2:26:32 PM
Attachments: image017.png
image018.png
image019.png
image020.png
image021.png
image022.png
image023.png
image024.png
image025.png
image026.png
image027.png
image028.png
image029.png
image030.png
image031.png
image032.png
041425_CupertinoCityCouncil_MaryAveVillas.docx
Councilmember Fruen, also received. Thank you

Kirsten Squarcia
City Clerk
City Manager's Office
[email protected]
(408) 777-3225

From: J.R. Fruen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 12:11 PM
To: Kirsten Squarcia <[email protected]>; Pamela Wu <[email protected]> Subject: FW:

This letter is relevant to Item 12 on tomorrow’s agenda and I kindly ask that you include it in written communications.

J.R. Fruen
Councilmember
City Council
[email protected]
(408)777-1316

From: Sullivan, Nancy <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 10:58 AM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Subject:

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello City Council,
Thank you for your consideration of the attached letter in support of the Mary Avenue Villas project.

Nancy Sullivan, M.A.

Director of Educational & Special Services
408-522-2232

My working day may be different from your working day. Please do not feel obliged to reply to this email outside your regular working hours.

April 14, 2025

Cupertino City Council
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014

Dear Mayor Chao, and all Cupertino City Council Members,

I’m writing to express my strong support for the Mary Avenue Villas project and to urge the City Council to approve the funding allocations recommended by the Housing Commission. This project will bring over 40 affordable homes to Cupertino, including 19 units specifically for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). It’s a crucial step in addressing the need for affordable and supportive housing in our community.

In Fremont Union High School District, we have long standing programs to support youth with disabilities learn and live within their community. A strong and important component of our transition-related services is to create Community Based Instruction opportunities to help support access to daily living and vocational opportunities.

When students leave our district programs at age 22, they are often accessing adult programs throughout Santa Clara County. Having the Mary Avenue Villas located within their immediate learning environment could promote a new level of success and independence for a group of people who are so often marginalized.

There are many different kinds of votes you are asked to cast as part of being a city council member. Using your voting power to increase access to affordable housing for people with disabilities has to be one of the most positive results of your work. People with disabilities have the legal right to live in community-based settings, not institutions, under the Lanterman Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Without affordable housing like Mary Avenue Villas, many individuals with IDD cannot fully enjoy these rights.

I urge the City Council to approve the necessary resources and make this project a reality. Mary Avenue Villas is a unique and important opportunity to offer affordable, inclusive housing for people with IDD, ensuring they remain part of the community. Having this option will greatly improve the lives of many.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Nancy Sullivan, M.A.

Director of Educational & Special Services
[email protected]
408-522-2232

From: Kirsten Squarcia
To: J.R. Fruen; Pamela Wu
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: RE: Approve Funding for Mary Avenue Villas
Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 2:20:43 PM
Attachments: image017.png
image018.png
image019.png
image020.png
image021.png
image022.png
image023.png
image024.png
image025.png
image026.png
image027.png
image028.png
image029.png
image030.png
image031.png
image032.png
Councilmember Fruen, we will also include this communication. Regards, Kirsten

Kirsten Squarcia
City Clerk
City Manager's Office
[email protected]
(408) 777-3225

From: J.R. Fruen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 12:12 PM
To: Kirsten Squarcia <[email protected]>; Pamela Wu <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Approve Funding for Mary Avenue Villas

This email is relevant to Item 12 on tomorrow’s agenda and I kindly ask that you include it in written communications.

J.R. Fruen
Councilmember
City Council
[email protected]
(408)777-1316

From: Oscar Ramirez <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 9:41 AM
To: City Council <[email protected]>; Gia Pham <[email protected]> Subject: Approve Funding for Mary Avenue Villas

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Cupertino City Council Members,
I’m writing to express my strong support for the Mary Avenue Villas project and to urge the City Council to approve the funding allocations recommended by the Housing Commission. This project will bring over 40 affordable homes to Cupertino, including 19 units specifically for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).

It’s a crucial step in addressing the need for affordable and supportive housing in our community.

Mary Avenue Villas will provide permanent housing and services that help adults with IDD live independently, with dignity, and stay connected to their community. In Cupertino, 70% of adults with developmental disabilities still live with aging parents. As these parents get older, their children face an uncertain future. This project will give them a safe and stable place to live.

INSERT YOUR PERSONAL HOUSING NEEDS
People with disabilities have the legal right to live in community-based settings, not institutions, under the Lanterman Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Without affordable housing like Mary Avenue Villas, many individuals with IDD cannot fully enjoy these rights.

There are 325 individuals with developmental disabilities in Cupertino, including 122 adults. Sadly, only a few live independently. Mary Avenue Villas is a chance to begin addressing this gap and provide long-term housing solutions for those who need it most.

The project is shovel ready; it just needs the City’s approval for funding.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Oscar Ramirez
From: Kirsten Squarcia
To: J.R. Fruen; Pamela Wu
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: RE: Approve Housing Commission Housing Funds Recommendations Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 2:17:57 PM
Attachments: image001.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image007.png
image008.png
image009.png
image011.png
image012.png
image013.png
image015.png
image016.png
image017.png
image018.png
image019.png
image020.png
letter of support_Mary Avenue.pdf
Will do Councilmember Fruen, thank you.

Kirsten Squarcia
City Clerk
City Manager's Office
[email protected]
(408) 777-3225

From: J.R. Fruen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 12:12 PM
To: Kirsten Squarcia <[email protected]>; Pamela Wu <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Approve Housing Commission Housing Funds Recommendations

This letter is relevant to Item 12 on tomorrow’s agenda and I kindly ask that you include it in written communications.

J.R. Fruen
Councilmember
City Council
[email protected]
(408)777-1316

From: Sarah Verity <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2025 9:10 AM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Subject: Approve Housing Commission Housing Funds Recommendations

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please accept the attached letter of support for the Mary Avenue Villas project being heard on Tuesday.

Thank you,
Sarah Verity (she / her)
Vice President, Board Relations and Legislative Affairs Cell: 650-766-1344
350 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 123
Redwood City, CA 94065
abilitypath.org

Via Services is now affiliated with AbilityPath, thriving together to provide a lifetime of opportunities for individuals with developmental disabilities. Learn more at abilitypath.org/affiliationFAQ.

April 12, 2025
Dear Cupertino City Council Members,
I am writing on behalf of AbilityPath to express my strong support for the Mary Avenue Villas project and to urge the City Council to approve the funding allocations recommended by the Housing Commission. This project will bring over 40 affordable homes to Cupertino, including 19 units specifically for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). It’s a crucial step in addressing the need for affordable and supportive housing in our community.

Mary Avenue Villas will provide permanent housing and services that help adults with IDD live independently, with dignity, and stay connected to their community.

In Cupertino, 70% of adults with developmental disabilities still live with aging parents. As these parents get older, their children face an uncertain future. This project will give them a safe and stable place to live.

AbilityPath has one of the most comprehensive service portfolios spanning all ages from early intervention for infants to community access and job training for adults and seniors. All programs are designed to prepare children and adults to actively participate in their schools, communities, workplaces, and at home.

People with disabilities have the legal right to live in community-based settings, not institutions, under the Lanterman Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Without affordable housing like Mary Avenue Villas, many individuals with IDD cannot fully enjoy these rights.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Sarah Verity
Sarah Verity
Vice President, Board Relations and Legislative Affairs From: Rhoda Fry
To: City Clerk; City Council
Subject: 4/15/2025 Agenda Item #12 BMR funds
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 12:16:16 PM
Attachments: Goldfarb and Lipman BMR (002).pdf
H - Weekly AP Payment Register for the Period Ending 1.19 (1).pdf D - Weekly AP Payment Register for the Period Ending 1.5 (1).pdf D - Weekly AP Payment Register for the Period Ending 1.5 (1).pdf PRA24-59 (1).pdf
Attachment A_ Annual Report on Development Impact Fees FY 2021 pages 6 8 9.pdf BMR fund summary 2.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council,

I remain concerned that our BMR funds are not being used as wisely as they could be used.

Please look at the last attachment that I put together using Cupertino City Data – it shows that the overhead of managing BMR programs is nearly the cost of delivering the programs!!! And keep in mind that the cost of delivering the programs also have their own overheads!!! If the BMR fund was a charity, it would get a very bad grade! I have also attached a report that shows how BMR funds are used by the City of Palo Alto where the overhead cost of managing their program appears to be far lower than ours.

We need to do better in managing our BMR fund.

As you may know, when I looked at the AP reports, I noticed a misallocation of BMR funds and reported it to City Attorney Chris Jensen.

When I found the City Attorney to be non-responsive on this issue, I sent information to the San Jose Spotlight.
https://sanjosespotlight.com/cupertino-spent-affordable-housing-funds-on-lawsuit/ Separately, Attorney Jensen refused to provide how much of our public money was used to litigate the YIMBY lawsuit, but it is obvious that it went well over the original $50K agreement. Strangely, there is no available public record that the agreement was extended.

The public still does not know how much money was restituted to the BMR fund.

Below is some information I sent to the audit committee a very long time ago.

----

Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 3:12 PM
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected] >
Subject: Public Comment Audit Committee 3/20/2024 #1

Dear Audit Committee,

This is one of several emails for public comment.

I would like to let you know that I spoke with the City Attorney on February 22, 2024 to let him know that funds from the restricted BMR Housing and Affordable Housing Fund (under AB 1600) had been mis-allocated to pay for stipulated judgement fees for a lawsuit file by YIMBY and others. Upon further review of the Accounts Payable and two PRAs from Goldfarb and Lipman, I found that around $165K had been improperly removed from the BMR fund to pay for litigation of the YIMBY lawsuit and Housing Element. It is difficult to determine how much money was improperly removed because the City works with the firm on multiple projects that are not split out in the Accounts Payable reports and the descriptions are not helpful.

The first attachment is a summary that I put together and it only covers judgement fees and Goldfarb and Lipman billings. The second and third attachments are examples of the payment register containing mis-allocated BMR transactions (search for BMR). Perusing through other Accounts Payable reports, it appears that other transactions might have been mis-allocated as well (such as Verizon bills). I am relieved to know that Mr. Orozco is competently engaged in ferreting out these issues that I had reported to City Council on February 27, 2024. I hope that other restricted accounts can be double-checked and that the BMR fund is reimbursed with the interested that it would have accrued had it remained there. It is thanks to Councilmember Moore that I had discovered these inconsistencies because she had created the policy of including the paying account names on the A/P register shared with Council.

On a related matter, the City contracted with Goldfarb and Lipman to litigate the YIMBY lawsuit not to exceed $50K. It is likely that this amount was exceeded (although it is hard to tell because the billings are combined with other services, all of which were redacted in the PRA). Could you please find out whether the legal fees exceeded $50K and if so, determine whether an updated contract is needed?

I would appreciate a report back to the Audit Committee on these items the next time the committee meets.

Thank You,
Rhoda Fry (40-year Cupertino resident)

The City of Cupertino BMR Housing and Affordable Housing Fund was improperly used to pay for the costs of a lawsuit and other expenses
This document refers only to the stipulated judgements from the YIMBY lawsuit and billings from Goldfarb & Lipman during a specific window in time. The City should look through all transactions from the BMR Housing Fund (because there are others that appear to be questionable) The BMR Housing and Affordable Housing Fund was used to pay for $15K of Stipulated Judgements The information below was copied from Accounts Payable Reports Payment to California Housing Defense Fund
BMR 2024-01-19 733921 1/2/2024 9000.00 Stipulated Judgement 23CV410817 Payment to Yes In My Back Yard
BMR 2024-01-19 733946 1/2/2024 6000.00 Stipulated Judgement 23CV410817 The BMR Housing and Affordable Housing Fund was used to pay legal costs for YIMBY lawsuit and Housing Element (HE) Two PRAs were requested, one for Goldfarb & Lipman for the "YIMBY" lawsuit and the other for "HE" Housing Element Services All line items in the PRA were redacted so it is impossible to know which costs were from the lawsuit vs housing element vs other This points to another problem - by looking at the description in the Accounts Payable (A/P) report, it is impossible to determine how much money was used for the lawsuit, the housing element, or other projects (these are highlighted below) and the descriptions of the transactions are not very helpful in determining the services rendered The total paid for bills containing YIMBY was $157,222.82 With the exception of $6748.82, all of the payments were made from the BMR Housing Fund It appears that over $165K of money used for this lawsuit and the housing element was improperly taken from the BMR fund Selected Payments to Goldfarb & Lipman YIMBY
Fund A/P Date A/P Entry Inv Date Invoice # HE, other Amount Description BMR 2024-01-26 38884 1/18/2024 470181 other 94.50 Housing Legal Review 2023/12 (2) BMR 2024-01-26 38884 1/18/2024 470095 other 790.00 Legal Services, December 2023 BMR 2024-01-26 38884 1/18/2024 470094 YIMBY/HE 2282.00 Housing Legal Review 2023/12 (3) BMR 2024-01-26 38884 1/16/2024 470030 other 306.00 Housing Legal Review 2023/12 BMR 2024-01-05 38735 12/20/2023 469494 other 787.50 Housing Legal Review 2023/11 (2) GENERAL 2023-12-22 38674 12/20/2023 469411 other 2054.00 Legal Services, November 2023 BMR 2024-01-05 38735 12/20/2023 469410 YIMBY/HE 2607.00 Housing Legal Review 2023/11 BMR 2023-12-01 38514 11/16/2023 468648 YIMBY/HE 35050.00 Housing Legal Review 2023/10 BMR 2023-11-03 38315 10/19/2023 467944 YIMBY/HE 39173.00 Housing Legal Review 2023/09 BMR 2023-10-06 38111 9/18/2023 467225 YIMBY/HE 12093.50 Housing Legal Review 2023/08 BMR 2023-08-17 37838 8/17/2023 466488 YIMBY/HE 10172.00 Housing Legal Review 2023/07 BMR 2023-07-28 37598 7/28/2023 465777 YIMBY/HE 9185.50 Housing Legal Review 2023/06 BMR 2023-07-28 37598 7/18/2023 465713 Unkown 238.00 Housing Legal Review 2023/06 BMR 2023-07-28 37598 6/27/2023 464881 YIMBY/HE 32850.00 Housing Legal Review 2023/04 BMR 2023-05-26 37114 5/16/2023 464209 YIMBY/HE 7062.00 Housing Legal Review 2023/04 BMR 2024-01-05 38735 4/25/2023 463698 other 409.50 Housing Legal Review 2023/4 (2) GENERAL 2023-04-28 36881 4/21/2023 463553 YIMBY/HE 6748.82 Housing Element Legal Review 2023/03 GENERAL 2023-03-17 36560 3/9/2023 462738 other 63.00 Housing Legal Review 2023/02 BMR 2023-03-17 36560 3/9/2023 462736 HE 63.00 Housing Element Update Legal Review 2023/02 BMR 2023-01-26 36185 1/18/2023 461402 other 442.00 Housing Legal Review 2022/12 BMR 2023-01-20 36128 1/20/2023 460429 other 306.00 Housing Legal Review 2022/11 BMR 2022-11-10 35665 10/31/2022 459229 other 136.00 Housing Legal Review 2022/09 BMR 2022-11-10 35665 10/28/2022 458952 other 714.00 Housing Legal Review 2022/09 BMR 2023-01-26 36185 10/5/2022 457757 other 2138.00 Housing Legal Review 2022/08 BMR 2022-11-10 35665 8/12/2022 146262 other 892.00 Housing Legal Review 2022/07 BMR 2022-08-26 35073 8/12/2022 146236 other 238.00 Housing Legal Review 2022/07 BMR 2022-08-19 35056 7/29/2022 146187 other 960.00 FY21-22 Housing Legal Review 2022/5 BMR 2022-07-29 34861 7/25/2022 146110 other 1760.00 FY21-22 Housing Legal Review 2022/06 BMR 2022-07-15 34749 6/30/2022 145777 other 2560.00 BMR Housing Legal Review 2022/05 FY21-22 BMR 2022-07-15 34749 6/30/2022 145776 other 288.00 Housing Legal Review 2022/05 FY21-22 BMR 2022-06-03 34413 05/24//2022 145313 other 992.00 Housing Legal Review 2022/-5 BMR 2022-05-06 34212 4/18/2022 144851 other 384.00 Housing Legal Review 2022/03 BMR 2022-07-28 34861 4/14/2022 144707 other 1984.00 FY21-22 Housing Legal Review 2022/04 BMR 2022-05-27 34353 2/24/2022 144110 other 3616.00 Housing Legal Review 2022/01 GENERAL 2022-04-15 34053 2/24/2022 144109 HE 256.00 Housing Element Update Legal Fees 2022/01 GENERAL 2022-04-15 34053 11/15/2021 142637 HE 64.00 Housing Element Update 2021/10 179759.32
Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
Main Account - Main Checking Account
Check
733845
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
3Form, LLC
$7,484.29
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
CO-367955
11/02/2023
Library Donor Wall Fabrication
$7,484.29
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
420 - Capital Improvement Fund
420 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$7,484.29
733846
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Arrow Acoustics, Inc.
$7,466.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
10124A
10/30/2023
Library Donor Wall Installation of 3Form
$7,466.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
420 - Capital Improvement Fund
420 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$7,466.00
733847
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
AT&T
$195.47
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
000020963839
12/12/2023
911 Emergency Lines 11/12/2023 - 12/11/2023
$195.47
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$195.47
733848
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Comcast
$967.39
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
187647289
12/01/2023
Business Class Internet - Mary, Stevens ck, Nov. 2023
$967.39
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$967.39
733849
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
County of Santa Clara -Office of the
Sheriff
$4,655.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1800088107
12/19/2023
Festival Sheriff Charges
$1,049.00
1800088108
12/19/2023
Festival Sheriff Charges - Diwali
$3,606.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$4,655.00
733850
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
DIALOG Design LP
$18,380.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
LP.100839
11/15/2023
Professional Services City Hall Renovation
$18,380.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
420 - Capital Improvement Fund
420 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$18,380.00
733851
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Elcor Electric, Inc.
$8,831.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
9860
12/22/2023
Quinlan Community Center - Replace Panel Switch
$8,831.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$8,831.00
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 1 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
733852
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Foster Brothers Security Systems
$38.19
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
4373
12/21/2023
Facilities- Mortise Thumb Turn Lock
$38.19
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$38.19
733853
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Freyer & Laureta, Inc.
$587.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
23-722
12/22/2023
Service Center Security Gate Project Design - Task IV
$587.50
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$587.50
733854
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
$2,290.60
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0024008
11/28/2023
Street- John S - Fence Post Mix, Pallet Deposit
$148.79
0390843
11/28/2023
Facilities - Brandon M - LED Wall Light
$38.25
9611507
11/29/2023
Facilities- Ty B-Rope, Alumin., Crimper Tool, Plug,
Center Punch
$247.56
9011891
11/29/2023
Facilities - Ty B - Screw Nut
$3.01
0011866
11/28/2023
Grounds- Bill B- Concrete Patch, Gate Latches, Spring
Assortment
$70.67
9030053
11/29/2023
Trees- Ricardo A- Stem Mount
$21.86
7030157
12/01/2023
Street- Michael K- Red Stake Flags
$32.71
3012337
12/05/2023
Street- Dan B- Utility Knife, 6 Pack Duracell Batteries $70.78
8024167
11/30/2023
Trees- Adrian S- Weather Tamper
$85.87
3602146
12/05/2023
Grounds- Travis W- Elect. PVC, Out. Box, Wallplate,
Adapt., PVC
$27.67
0321977
11/28/2023
Grounds- Travis W- Tapcon, Drill Bit, Flat Washer,
Screw
$131.21
9600163
11/29/2023
Facilities- Robert G- Black & White Grounding Plugs
$66.65
9011892
11/29/2023
Facilities - Ty Blomquist Plywood for mounting
electronics
$76.87
0030649
12/08/2023
Street- Dan B- 3/8x3 Rebar, 3/8 in x 3 ft. Rebar
$27.23
0524799
12/08/2023
Facilities- Michael C- Multi Surface Broom
$21.84
1012599
12/07/2023
Facilities- Michael C- Plywood & Lumbar Fee
$41.82
1400216
12/07/2023
Facilities- Brandon M- Commerical Stat-Tite
$31.70
1512536
12/07/2023
Facilities- Domingo S- Shut Off Coupling, Exit Sign
$97.23
7622272
12/11/2023
Facilities-Ty B-Tile Scraper, Bucket, Edge Blades,
Glass Scraper
$126.13
4091124
12/04/2023
Grounds-Ricardo A- Whip Kit, Liq. Tite, 3/4" Bell End,
3/4 Sched
$164.63
6525722
12/12/2023
Facilities- Michael M- HDX Handheld Invoice
$9.81
9013772
12/19/2023
Street- Shawn T- Blanket, Super Glue, Tarp, Tape,
Felt Strip
$74.30
9527372
12/19/2023
Facilities- Ty B- Sandnet
$65.56
8031342
12/20/2023
Facilities- Ty B- Interior Scaffold
$325.94
7612013
12/01/2023
Facilities- Robert G- 7.5 Festive Pine Trees
$216.56
5163939
12/13/2023
Facilities - Robert G- Credit for Returned Christmas
Tree
($108.27)
3400221
11/15/2023
Facilities- Brandon M- 2-inch Knife, Putty Knives
$12.78
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 2 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
7390886
12/21/2023
Facilities- Brandon M- Toilet Fill Valve
$16.38
8092062
12/20/2023
Facilities- Michael C- Moth Balls
$41.50
8031373
12/20/2023
Grounds- Bill B- Sprayway Glass Foam
$10.81
7024694
12/11/2023
Street- John S - Knit Poly Roller
$92.75
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,845.05
230 - Env Mgmt Cln Crk Strm Drain
230 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$70.78
270 - Transportation Fund
270 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$343.07
570 - Sports Center
570 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$31.70
733855
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

HUICHEN LIN
$761.60
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
122123
12/21/2023
November-December 2023 Classes
$761.60
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$761.60
733856
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
HY Floor & Gameline Painting
$1,360.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
23275-01
12/22/2023
Facilities- Sports Center Multipurpose Room Floor
$1,360.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
570 - Sports Center
570 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,360.00
733857
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

IRON MOUNTAIN
$1,912.55
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
JCHS870
12/31/2023
City Clerk Office Storage - 1/1/24 - 1/31/24
$1,912.55
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,912.55
733858
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC
$369.15
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
808-00000890604
12/21/2023
Facilities- Primer
$369.15
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$369.15
733859
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Kitchell CEM
$7,000.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
116068
11/14/2023
Professional Services City-wide Building Assessment,
10/1/2023-1
$7,000.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
420 - Capital Improvement Fund
420 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$7,000.00
733860
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Li-Fen Lin
$2,163.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12222023
12/22/2023
December 2023 Program Payment
$2,163.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 3 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$2,163.00
733861
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
MSI Fuel Management, Inc.
$29,071.79
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
5793
12/14/2023
MSI Fuel Management, for FMLive SaaS
$29,071.79
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$29,071.79
733862
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Napa Auto Parts
$95.79
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
713649
12/21/2023
Fleet- Air Filter
$95.79
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
630 - Vehicle/Equip Replacement
630 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$95.79
733863
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

NOR-CAL SPECIALTIES
$339.45
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
18120
10/19/2023
Retention on Sports Center Partition Replacement
Project
$339.45
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$339.45
733864
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
O'Reilly Auto Parts
$70.06
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2591-338852
12/28/2023
Fleet- Purge Sol
$70.06
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
630 - Vehicle/Equip Replacement
630 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$70.06
733865
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Operating Engineers Local Union No.
3 $1,560.65
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12292023
12/29/2023
Union Dues pp 12/16/23-12/29/23
$1,560.65
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,560.65
733866
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Quadient, Inc.
$1,946.04
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
60727333
01/01/2024
Standard Maintenance for Postage Machine 01/31/24-
04/29/24)
$1,946.04
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,946.04
733867
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

REBECCA MCCORMICK
$2,223.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12222023
12/22/2023
December 2023 Program Payment
$2,223.50
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$2,223.50
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 4 of 15
user: Vi Tran

RPM EXTERMINATORS INC
$1,275.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0105875
12/29/2023
Facilities - Bait Trap Service
$1,275.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,020.00
570 - Sports Center
570 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$255.00
733869
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Rupa Narayanan
$567.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
122023
12/20/2023
November-December 2023 Classes
$567.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$567.00
733870
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY
$70,259.93
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
SJW112723-0
11/27/2023
0134100000-6 - 8303 Memorial Park
$3,105.39
SJW112723-1
11/27/2023
0345710000-0 - Alderbrook Ln.FS
$165.77
SJW112723-2
11/27/2023
0677310000-0 - 10300 Torre Ave LS (Comm.Hall)
$699.68
SJW112723-3
11/27/2023
1198300000-8 - 21979 San Fernando Ave. 6620 (Trail
Restroom)
$280.17
SJW112723-4
11/27/2023
1250520000-1 - 6620 Blackberry/Snack
$614.24
SJW112723-5
11/27/2023
1332100000-5 - Hyde Avenue
$3,620.72
SJW112723-6
11/27/2023
1444810000-9 - Hyannisport Dr. LS
$1,846.07
SJW112723-7
11/27/2023
1735700000-3 - 8303 Memorial Park Restroom
$352.78
SJW112723-8
11/27/2023
1787904559-3 - 22221 McClellan 8302
$211.96
SJW112723-9
11/27/2023
1832500000-0 - Ruppell PL LS
$1,043.77
SJW112723-10
11/27/2023
1836700000-9 - 8322 Mary Mini Park
$287.42
SJW112723-11
11/27/2023
1987700000-0 - Alderbrook Ln LS
$4,442.02
SJW112723-12
11/27/2023
2228610000-7 - 21111 Stevens Crk LS
$301.94
SJW112723-13
11/27/2023
2243500000-9 - 10300 Ainsworth Dr.LS
$1,660.09
SJW112723-14
11/27/2023
2286120000-8 - 21251 Stevens Creek Blvd
$104.65
SJW112723-15
11/27/2023
2288800000-1 - Stokes Ave/8306 Somerset Park
$512.57
SJW112723-16
11/27/2023
2649300000-9 - 10300 Torre Ave. FS (Comm.Hall)
$165.77
SJW112723-17
11/27/2023
2787197813-9 - 8322 Stevens Creek Bl
$88.52
SJW112723-18
11/27/2023
2892070144-9 - 22221 McClellan 8320
$209.31
SJW112723-19
11/27/2023
2958510000-0 - 10555 Mary Ave.
$88.52
SJW112723-20
11/27/2023
2974010000-2 - 21251 Stevens Creek Blvd
$679.61
SJW112723-21
11/27/2023
2984810000-3 - 8504 Alves and Stelling
$367.31
SJW112723-22
11/27/2023
3207400000-4 - 21710 McClellan 8312
$1,304.21
SJW112723-23
11/27/2023
3322910000-4 - 8306 Somerset Park(Stokes Ave)
$280.17
SJW112723-24
11/27/2023
3530520000-4 - 21111 Stev.Crk Blvd 8510
$468.99
SJW112723-25
11/27/2023
3612707315-7 - Stocklmeir Ct
$252.16
SJW112723-26
11/27/2023
3673220000-5 - Stev.Crk/Cupertino Rd.
$88.52
SJW112723-27
11/27/2023
3746710000-6 - 21111 Stev.Crk BL FS
$164.46
SJW112723-28
11/27/2023
3841010000-2 - 8507 Monta Vista Park
$338.26
SJW112723-29
11/27/2023
3856110000-9 - 8322 Stella Estates
$88.52
SJW112723-30
11/27/2023
3857710000-1 - 8322 Foothill/Cupertino Rd
$262.80
SJW112723-31
11/27/2023
3900520000-9 - 10300 Torre Ave
$642.47
SJW112723-32
11/27/2023
3953083125-2 - Tuscany Pl
$562.41
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 5 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
SJW112723-33
11/27/2023
4012210000-7 - 22601 Voss Av 8304
$2,172.78
SJW112723-34
11/27/2023
4103020000-4 - 6620 Blackberry/Snack
$396.37
SJW112723-35
11/27/2023
4227520000-6 - 8303 Memorial Park
$715.92
SJW112723-36
11/27/2023
4444250747-9 - Tuscany Pl
$536.25
SJW112723-37
11/27/2023
5237400000-9 - Dumas Dr, LS
$4,171.17
SJW112723-38
11/27/2023
5356310000-6 - 8322 Stev.Crk/Median
$280.17
SJW112723-39
11/27/2023
5778910000-5 - 8504 Quinlan Ln.FS
$104.65
SJW112723-40
11/27/2023
5835000000-4 - 8322 Stelling/Alves
$175.66
SJW112723-41
11/27/2023
5929210000-1 - 8322 Ann Arbor Ct
$182.91
SJW112723-42
11/27/2023
5948100000-4 - Emerg Irrig/Golf/ 6640 BBF (Irrigation)
$6,406.79
SJW112723-43
11/27/2023
5986710000-6 - 10300 Torre Ave. FS (Comm.Hall)
$547.31
SJW112723-44
11/27/2023
5997110000-9 - 7555 Barnhart Pl
$2,247.34
SJW112723-45
11/27/2023
6292600000-1 - 10800 Torre Ave LS
$1,452.13
SJW112723-46
11/27/2023
6296810000-8 - 8322 Stev.Crk Bl median
$88.52
SJW112723-47
11/27/2023
6405210000-1 - 8506 McClellan Ranch
$204.72
SJW112723-48
11/27/2023
6578520000-0 - 83 Foothill Bl/Alpine Dr22 LS
$175.66
SJW112723-49
11/27/2023
6730700000-9 - 21975 San Fernando Av
$270.08
SJW112723-50
11/27/2023
6788620000-4 - 10555 Mary Ave. 8503
$367.31
SJW112723-51
11/27/2023
6907100000-9 - Alderbrook Ln
$251.67
SJW112723-52
11/27/2023
6935200000-9 - 8303 Memorial Park
$4,913.82
SJW112723-53
11/27/2023
6973320000-5 - 8301 Linda Vista PK1
$476.26
SJW112723-54
11/27/2023
7036000000-7 - 85 Stev.Crk/Mary LS
$182.91
SJW112723-55
11/27/2023
7054200000-8 - 8322 Phar Lap LS
$53.66
SJW112723-56
11/27/2023
7495200000-3 - 10300 Torre Ave FS
$165.77
SJW112723-57
11/27/2023
7630410000-1 - Salem Av.LS
$175.66
SJW112723-58
11/27/2023
7930000000-1 - 8322 Stelling/Christensen Dr.
$371.75
SJW112723-59
11/27/2023
8006810000-9 - 10450 Mann Dr
$53.66
SJW112723-60
11/27/2023
8065700000-8 - Peninsula and Fitzgerald Is
$60.91
SJW112723-61
11/27/2023
8270010000-9 - Janice Ave.LS
$287.42
SJW112723-62
11/27/2023
8287220000-9 - 8322 Stevens Cr/San Antonio Ls
$95.77
SJW112723-63
11/27/2023
8427420000-9 - 8322 Foothill/Vista Knoll
$320.90
SJW112723-64
11/27/2023
8549600000-2 - Bubb Rd.LS
$2,280.97
SJW112723-65
11/27/2023
8647520000-1 - 10555 Mary Ave/Corp Yard FS
$269.11
SJW112723-66
11/27/2023
8755010000-9 - 10455 Miller Ave/Creekside
$405.04
SJW112723-67
11/27/2023
8879620000-9 - 8504 Christensen Dr
$345.52
SJW112723-68
11/27/2023
8886800000-6 - 8301 Linda Vista PK2
$476.26
SJW112723-69
11/27/2023
9377600000-7 - 8307 Varian Park
$1,173.47
SJW112723-70
11/27/2023
9824500000-9 - 8322 Irrig SC/Stelling
$342.68
SJW112723-71
11/27/2023
9988206980-2 (old 6784967491-5) - 8303 Memorial
Park
$2,361.60
SJW112923-0
11/29/2023
5122900000-8 - Portable Meter - Trees & ROW
$601.56
SJW120423-0
12/04/2023
0251610000-1 - 19500 Calle De Barcelona
$110.04
SJW120423-1
12/04/2023
1649600000-7 - Barrington Bridge Lane
$938.41
SJW120423-2
12/04/2023
2628900000-7 - Farallone Dr.LS
$2,992.26
SJW120423-3
12/04/2023
8148220000-3 - Sterling BL LS(Sterlinig BarnhartPk)
$679.28
SJW120723-0
12/07/2023
0068410000-1 - 22221 McClellan 8302
$4,076.58
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$62,917.75
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 6 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
560 - Blackberry Farm
560 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$6,406.79
570 - Sports Center
570 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$935.39
733871
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

SYSCO - SAN FRANCISCO
$423.49
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
650169367
11/16/2023
BWS Food - SYSCO - Food for 300 Breakfast w. Santa
$423.49
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$423.49
733872
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

T-MOBILE
$127.99
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
4158-122123
12/21/2023
966594158-122123
$127.99
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$127.99
733873
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
DYG Realty Investments LLC
$5,000.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
274660
01/03/2024
10621 Gascoigne Dr, Encroachment, 274660
$5,000.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$5,000.00
733874
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Orlow, Claire
$95.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2002119.032
12/21/2023
Trip Cancellation Refund
$95.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$95.00
Type Check Totals:
30 Transactions
$177,517.43
EFT
38718
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance
$29.16
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12292023
12/29/2023
Colonial Products pp 12/16/23-12/29/23
$29.16
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$29.16
38719
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Employment Development
$12,487.43
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12292023
12/29/2023
State Disability Insurance pp 12/16/23-12/29/23
$12,487.43
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$12,487.43
38720
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
National Deferred (ROTH)
$3,234.89
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12292023
12/29/2023
Nationwide Roth pp 12/16/23-12/29/23
$3,234.89
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$3,234.89
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 7 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
38721
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
National Deferred Compensatin
$55,940.42
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12292023
12/29/2023
Nationwide Deferred Compensation pp 12/16/23-
12/29/23
$55,940.42
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$55,940.42
38722
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
PERS-457K
$14,878.30
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12292023
12/29/2023
PERS 457K pp 12/16/23-12/29/23
$14,878.30
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$14,878.30
38723
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
State Disbursement Unit
$349.65
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12292023
12/29/2023
Child Support pp 12/16/23-12/29/23
$349.65
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$349.65
38724
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Acuity Brands Technology Services,
Inc.
$45,500.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
E2024-75
12/20/2023
BuildingOS Atrius Platform 12/10/23 -12/9/24
$45,500.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$45,500.00
38725
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Aquatic Central
$3,000.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
100015
12/15/2023
Facilities - Dec 2023 Library Aquarium Maintenance
$3,000.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$3,000.00
38726
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

B&H PHOTO-VIDEO
$13,788.82
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
219629104
12/18/2023
24x SEAGATE ENTERPRS SATA 6GB/S HDD/REG,
2x SYNOLOGY RS2423RP+ 1
$13,788.82
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$13,788.82
38727
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Bikeep Inc.
$49.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
18041
12/31/2023
Bikeep Upkeep & Maintenance, December 2023
$49.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$49.00
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 8 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
38728
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
BKF Engineers
$6,126.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
23120791
12/08/2023
Processional Services I-280 Trail, 10/30/2023-
11/26/2023
$6,126.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
420 - Capital Improvement Fund
420 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$6,126.00
38729
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
BMI Imaging Systems
$13,650.20
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
320782
11/15/2023
Finance Division Scanning Services - 32 Boxes Nov.
2023
$13,650.20
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$13,650.20
38730
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

BOSCO OIL INC DBA VALLEY OIL
$13,637.53
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
179689
12/21/2023
Fleet- Diesel Fuel, Gasoline, Storage Fees,
Environmental Fees
$13,637.53
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
630 - Vehicle/Equip Replacement
630 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$13,637.53
38731
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
CSG Consultants, Inc.
$330.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
54189
12/05/2023
Professional Svcs Emergency Storm Drain, 10//2/2023
-11/24/2023
$330.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
420 - Capital Improvement Fund
420 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$330.00
38732
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
David Stillman
$144.95
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
DavidS12192023
12/19/2023
Transportation Group Meeting
$144.95
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$144.95
38733
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Doggie Walk Bags, Inc.
$3,437.44
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0110994-IN
12/18/2023
Grounds- Unscented Disposable Bags
$3,437.44
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$3,437.44
38734
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Eflex Group, Inc
$4,716.29
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12292023
12/29/2023
FSA pp 12/16/23-12/29/23
$4,716.29
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$4,716.29
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 9 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
38735
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Goldfarb & Lipman LLP
$3,804.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
469410
12/20/2023
Housing Legal Review 2023/11
$2,607.00
463698
04/25/2023
Housing Legal Review 2023/4 (2)
$409.50
469494
12/20/2023
Housing Legal Review 2023/11 (2)
$787.50
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
265 - BMR Housing
265 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$3,804.00
38736
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

GRACE DUVAL
$533.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12222023
12/22/2023
December 2023 Program Payment
$533.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$533.00
38737
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

GRAINGER INC
$400.79
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
9942400954
12/20/2023
Facilities- Disposable Respirator, N95 Masks
$145.94
9941941560
12/20/2023
Facilities- Roof Leak Diverter
$196.05
9943520164
12/21/2023
Facilities- Vibration Absorber
$58.80
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$400.79
38738
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
IFPTE LOCAL 21
$1,936.06
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12292023
12/29/2023
Association Dues - CEA pp 12/16/23-12/29/23
$1,936.06
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,936.06
38739
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
IMPEC GROUP INC,.
$67,835.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2312133
12/31/2023
Facilities - December 2023 Janitorial Services
$67,835.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$58,308.00
560 - Blackberry Farm
560 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,159.00
570 - Sports Center
570 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$8,368.00
38740
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Jenny Tsai
$3,965.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12222023
12/22/2023
December 2023 Program Payment
$3,965.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$3,965.00
38741
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

JIA THOMPSON
$1,638.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12222023
12/22/2023
December 2023 Program Payment
$1,638.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 10 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,638.00
38742
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

JULIA KINST
$55.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
JuliaK12192023
12/19/2023
Cell Phone Reimbursement 11/20/23-12/19/23
$55.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$55.00
38743
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

KEVIN GREENE
$55.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
KevinG121823
12/18/2023
Cell Phone Reimbursement - Kevin G 11.19.23 to

12.18.23 $55.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$55.00
38744
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

KEVIN RIEDEN
$50.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
KevinR12122023
12/12/2023
Cell Phone Bill through 12122023
$50.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$50.00
38745
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

KIMBALL-MIDWEST
$1,044.98
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
101765624
12/27/2023
Street- Ult Promax Safety Red
$1,044.98
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,044.98
38746
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Mary Nickel
$332.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
122123
12/21/2023
November-December 2023 Classes
$332.50
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$332.50
38747
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
MissionSquare
$17,156.77
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12292023
12/29/2023
ICMA pp 12/16/23-12/29/23
$17,156.77
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$17,156.77
38748
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc.
$22,857.02
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0084101
12/15/2023
Prof Services All-Inclusive Playground, 11/1/2023-
11/30/2023
$13,658.19
0084102
12/15/2023
Professional Services LM Park, 11/1/2023-11/30/2023
$9,198.83
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
280 - Park Dedication
280 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$9,198.83
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 11 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
420 - Capital Improvement Fund
420 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$13,658.19
38749
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Pacific Office Automation
$10,210.32
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
080024
09/08/2023
July 28, 2023 MFP CH 080024 Meters Service
$4,288.33
130532
10/20/2023
Sept. 21, 2023 MFP CH 130532 Meters service
$1,087.50
973403
02/21/2022
Quarterly Maint. & Support for 15 mfp 11/15/21 -
02/14/22
$1,292.97
091215
05/24/2022
MFP Labor & Initialization PERFORMED ALIGNMENT
& CALIBRATION
$180.00
746530
11/21/2022
Quarterly Maint. & Support for 15 mfp 08/20/22 -
11/20/22
$3,361.52
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$10,210.32
38750
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
PARS/City of Cupertino
$2,359.15
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12292023
12/29/2023
PARS pp 12/16/23-12/29/23
$2,359.15
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$2,359.15
38751
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Preferred Alliance, Inc.
$2,019.12
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0191752-IN
12/21/2023
DEC23 - Annual Recon & 11-20 Participants Offsite
$2,019.12
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$2,019.12
38752
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Quartic Solutions
$724.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
3762
12/12/2023
FY24 Quartic for GIS Support - November 2023
$724.50
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$724.50
38753
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Richard Yau
$6,600.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2310
11/22/2023
Professional Services CIP Project Management,
10/1/2023-10/31/20
$6,600.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
210 - Storm Drain Improvement
210 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,050.00
420 - Capital Improvement Fund
420 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$5,550.00
38754
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

RUBY CHEN
$600.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12222023
12/22/2023
December 2023 Program Payment
$600.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$600.00
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 12 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
38755
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Santa Clara Valley Transportation
Authority
$101,648.13
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1800034295
12/21/2023
Congestion Mgmt Program (CMP) Member Agency
Fees 7/1/23-6/30/24
$101,648.13
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$101,648.13
38756
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Sedgwick Claims Management
Services, Inc.
$2,343.33
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
400000168956
01/02/2024
Worker's Compensation Claims 1/1/24-1/31/24
$2,343.33
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
620 - Workers' Compensation
620 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$2,343.33
38757
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Sonitrol/Pacific West Security, Inc.
$11,670.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
79893
01/01/2024
Sports Center Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-Mar
2024
$741.00
79792
01/01/2024
Traffic Ops Center Security/Fire Alarm Inspections
Jan-Mar 2024
$366.00
79880
01/01/2024
BBF Retreat Center Security/Fire Alarm Inspections
Jan-Mar 2024
$252.00
79888
01/01/2024
Monta Vista Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-Mar
2024
$807.00
79887
01/01/2024
Senior Center Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-Mar
2024
$174.00
79790
01/01/2024
BBF Cafe Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-Mar
2024
$402.00
79883
01/01/2024
Library & Comm Hall Security/Fire Alarm Inspections
Jan-Mar 2024
$678.00
79886
01/01/2024
Wilson Snack Shack Security/Fire Alarm Inspections
Jan-Mar 2024
$138.00
79884
01/01/2024
QCC Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-Mar 2024
$1,038.00
79784
01/01/2024
BBF Golf Maint Bldg Security/Fire Alarm Inspections
Jan-Mar 202
$273.00
79791
01/01/2024
City Hall Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-Mar 2024
$1,749.00
79890
01/01/2024
Wilson Park Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-Mar
2024
$261.00
79885
01/01/2024
City Hall Elevator Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan- Mar 2024
$111.00
79889
01/01/2024
Creekside Park Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-
Mar 2024
$345.00
79882
01/01/2024
MC Ranch& Comm Hall Security/Fire Alarm
Inspections Jan-Mar 2024
$1,548.00
79892
01/01/2024
Service Center Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-
Mar 2024
$936.00
79785
01/01/2024
BBF Kiosk Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-Mar
2024
$252.00
79891
01/01/2024
City Hall Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-Mar 2024
$624.00
79881
01/01/2024
Library Security/Fire Alarm Inspections Jan-Mar 2024
$975.00
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 13 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$10,929.00
570 - Sports Center
570 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$741.00
38758
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Starbird Consulting LLC
$4,480.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0245
12/18/2023
Professional Services Regnart Rd through November

30.2023
$4,480.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
420 - Capital Improvement Fund
420 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$4,480.00
38759
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Superco Specialty Products
$280.98
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
PSI532327
12/27/2023
Fleet- Preserv-It Liquid
$280.98
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
630 - Vehicle/Equip Replacement
630 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$280.98
38760
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

TERI GERHARDT
$35.46
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
TeriG111723
11/17/2023
Teri Gerhardt Cell reimbursement Oct 17 - Nov 17
2023
$35.46
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$35.46
38761
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Vintage Contractors, Inc
$31,240.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
7819
12/04/2023
Grounds- Basketball Resurfacing @ Creekside,
Hoover & Somerset
$31,240.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$31,240.00
38762
01/05/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
$286.72
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
INV232532369
12/22/2023
Zoom Webinar 1000 Dec 22, 2023 - Jan 21, 2024
$286.72
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$286.72
Type EFT Totals:
45 Transactions
$487,460.91
Main Account - Main Checking Account Totals
Checks
Status
Count
Transaction Amount
Reconciled Amount
Open
30 $177,517.43
$0.00
Reconciled
0 $0.00
$0.00
Voided
0 $0.00
$0.00
Stopped
0 $0.00
$0.00
Total
30 $177,517.43
$0.00
EFTs
Status
Count
Transaction Amount
Reconciled Amount
Monday, January 8, 2024
Pages: 14 of 15
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 12/30/2023 - To Payment Date: 1/5/2024 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
Open 45 $487,460.91 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 45 $487,460.91 $0.00
All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 75 $664,978.34 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 75 $664,978.34 $0.00
Grand Totals:

Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 30 $177,517.43 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 30 $177,517.43 $0.00
EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 45 $487,460.91 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 45 $487,460.91 $0.00
All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 75 $664,978.34 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 75 $664,978.34 $0.00
Monday, January 8, 2024Pages: 15 of 15user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
Main Account - Main Checking Account
Check
733917
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Advantage Grafix
$106.94
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
48201
01/08/2024
Lori B. Business Cards
$106.94
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
520 - Resource Recovery
520 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$106.94
733918
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Astrid Chevallier
$1,000.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01162024
01/16/2024
Arts & Culture Commission Distinguished Artist Award
Chevallier
$1,000.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,000.00
733919
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
AT&T
$195.47
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
000021095794
01/12/2024
911 Emergency Lines 12/12/2023 - 01/11/2024
$195.47
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$195.47
733920
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Bay Aerials Gymnastics
$18,311.40
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01162024
01/16/2024
December 2023 Program Payment
$18,311.40
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$18,311.40
733921
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
California Housing Defense Fund
$9,000.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
Stipulated_Judgm
01/02/2024
Stipulated Judgment re 23CV410817
$9,000.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
265 - BMR Housing
265 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$9,000.00
733922
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Chloe Yoon
$750.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01162024
01/16/2024
Arts & Culture Commission Emerging Artist Award
Chloe Yoon
$750.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$750.00
733923
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

COMCAST
$2,049.59
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
3310-010724
01/07/2024
8155 40 065 0183310 -010724
$2,049.59
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$423.47
570 - Sports Center
570 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$559.95
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 1 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,066.17
733924
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Comcast
$967.39
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
190176184
01/01/2024
Business Class Internet - Mary, Stevens ck, Dec. 2023
$967.39
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$967.39
733925
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
County of Santa Clara -Office of the
Sheriff
$1,463,927.17
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1800088322
01/02/2024
Advance for Law Enforcement Jan 2024
$1,463,927.17
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,463,927.17
733926
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Data Ticket, Inc.
$44.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
159854
01/10/2024
Online access to citation processing-Nov 2023
$44.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
230 - Env Mgmt Cln Crk Strm Drain
230 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$44.00
733927
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Department of Conservation
$8,714.44
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
Fee Oct-Dec 2023
01/19/2024
Dep of Conservation Fee Report OCT-DEC2023
$8,714.44
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$8,714.44
733928
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Dex Systems Engineering
$4,675.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1623
01/10/2024
Repair ClearCom headsets; Tree Lighting Ceremony;
Install Monito
$4,675.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$4,675.00
733929
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Division of the State Architect
$269.10
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
DSA OCT-DEC23
01/19/2024

DISABILITY ACCESS & EDUCATION FEE
QUARTERLY REPORT ($4)
$269.10
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$269.10
733930
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Mountain View Garden Center
$344.84
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
114941
01/10/2024
Street- Sand for Sand Bags
$344.84
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$344.84
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 2 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
733931
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Napa Auto Parts
$495.82
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
714555
01/08/2024
Fleet- Spin-on Fluid Filter
$70.28
714564
01/08/2024
Fleet- ATC-10, ATC-15, ATC-25 Fuse Pac
$42.40
714761
01/10/2024
Fleet- Spin-on Fluid Filter
$123.26
714748
01/10/2024
Fleet- Wipers Blades
$193.16
714830
01/11/2024
Fleet- Spin-On Fluid Filter
$66.72
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
630 - Vehicle/Equip Replacement
630 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$495.82
733932
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Occupational Health Centers of
California, A Medi
$35.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
81418575
01/09/2024
TB Test - C. Edmonds
$35.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$35.00
733933
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Operating Engineers Local Union No.
3 $1,537.62
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01122024
01/12/2024
Union Dues pp 12/30/23-1/12/24
$1,537.62
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,537.62
733934
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Pacific Polymers Company
$4,265.63
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
7435
01/11/2024
Grounds - Can Liners
$4,265.63
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$4,265.63
733935
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
PG&E
$6,294.97
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
7100-011624
01/16/2024
7166121710-0 12/8/23-1/7/24
$6,294.97
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$6,294.97
733936
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
PG&E
$8.94
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1937-122723
12/27/2023
8754273193-7 11/20/23-12/19/23
$8.94
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$8.94
733937
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
PG&E
$14.01
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0322-121423
12/14/2023
5849279032-2 11/7/23-12/7/23
$14.01
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$14.01
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 3 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
733938
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Royal Coach Tours
$1,449.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
29290
01/31/2024
Charter 29290: 1/31/24 - MJ the Musical Trip
$1,449.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,449.00
733939
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Santa Clara County Emergency
Managers Association
$89.94
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
240018.1
01/17/2024
SCC EMA Membership
$89.94
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$89.94
733940
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
SESAC
$1,888.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
10703773
01/01/2024
Music License Yearly Fee 2024 - SESAC
$1,888.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,888.00
733941
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
South Bay Foundry
$720.28
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0234072
01/10/2024
Street- 1P 1H Storm Drain, 6" Tall, 24" Clear Sign
$720.28
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
230 - Env Mgmt Cln Crk Strm Drain
230 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$720.28
733942
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

SPRAYTEC
$15,659.44
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
18502
11/22/2023
Fleet- Sprayer, Pump, Eng., Elect. Reel, Hose, &
Controller
$15,659.44
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
630 - Vehicle/Equip Replacement
630 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$15,659.44
733943
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
State Water Resources Control Board
$399.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
WD-0258752
12/15/2023
Regnart Creek Trail Project through 070123-063024
$399.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
420 - Capital Improvement Fund
420 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$399.00
733944
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
United Site Services
$712.68
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
INV-4117125
01/15/2024
Trees/ROW- SWP 1/15/24-2/11/24
$492.78
114-13780757
01/16/2024
portable toilet at compost site Jan-Feb 2024
$219.90
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$492.78
520 - Resource Recovery
520 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$219.90
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 4 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
733945
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
VNH Builders
$18,167.53
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2023-103-5
01/10/2024
Service Center Security Gate Project
$18,167.53
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$18,167.53
733946
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Yes In My Back Yard
$6,000.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
Stipulated_Judgm
01/02/2024
Stipulated Judgment re 23CV410817
$6,000.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
265 - BMR Housing
265 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$6,000.00
733947
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Lin, Yishan
$150.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01112024
01/11/2024
Arts & Culture Commission Young Artist Group B
Award Yishan Lin
$150.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$150.00
733948
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Onorato, Janelle
$32.25
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2008584.030
01/12/2024
1/12/2024- Basketball #22159 Class Refund
$32.25
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$32.25
733949
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Peng, Tina
$32.25
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2008570.030
01/12/2024
1/12/2024- Basketball #22159 Class Refund
$32.25
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$32.25
733950
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Salazar, Lindsey
$52.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
Salazar1 - 2024
01/02/2024
Livescan Reimbursement - Lindsey Salazar
$52.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$52.00
733951
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Subramanian, Laksh
$77.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2008561.030
01/12/2024
1/12/2024- Basketball #22158 Class Refund
$77.50
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$77.50
733952
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Wang, Amelia
$150.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01112024
01/11/2024
Arts & Culture Commission Young Artist Group A
Award Amelia Wang
$150.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 5 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$150.00
Type Check Totals:
36 Transactions
$1,568,587.20
EFT
38813
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance
$29.16
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01122024
01/12/2024
Colonial Products pp 12/30/23-1/12/24
$29.16
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$29.16
38814
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Employment Development
$10,341.64
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01122024
01/12/2024
State Disability Insurance pp 12/30/23-1/12/24
$10,341.64
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$10,341.64
38815
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
National Deferred (ROTH)
$3,234.89
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01122024
01/12/2024
Nationwide Roth pp 12/30/23-1/12/24
$3,234.89
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$3,234.89
38816
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
National Deferred Compensatin
$21,174.02
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01122024
01/12/2024
Nationwide Deferred Compensation pp 12/30/23-
1/12/24
$21,174.02
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$21,174.02
38817
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
PERS-457K
$14,482.52
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01122024
01/12/2024
PERS 457K pp 12/30/23-1/12/24
$14,482.52
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$14,482.52
38818
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
State Disbursement Unit
$349.65
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01122024
01/12/2024
Child Support pp 12/30/23-1/12/24
$349.65
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$349.65
38819
01/16/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
TASC
$2,791.08
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
IN2988493
01/11/2024
FSA - Administration Fees 1/1/24-1/31/24
$2,791.08
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$2,791.08
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 6 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
38820
01/16/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
TASC
$495.91
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
IN2988490
01/11/2024
HRA - Administration Fees 1/1/24-1/31/24
$495.91
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$495.91
38821
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Amazon Capital Services
$1,145.97
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1F7W-CFLG-X4Y9
01/01/2024
Amazon Purchases Dec 2023 - PR3 Sports Recreation
$52.36
1HRQ-YRJY-WPXH
01/01/2024
5x headphones, calculator, 2x USB-C charger, 2x UPS
Battery repl
$988.30
1MHK-KCNM-TVHN
01/01/2024
Amazon Purchases Dec 2023 - PR2 Senior Wellness
$113.00
14LM-J14W-641X
12/15/2023
Apply credit memo related to invoice 136J-N776-GC64
($41.46)
17YK-RTMM-6DNH
12/15/2023
Apply credit memo related to invoice 136J-N776-GC64
($41.46)
17HF-TQXY-XH9T
01/01/2024
Amazon Purchases Dec 2023 - PR4 Events, Facilities,
Youth, Teen
$71.31
1H9V-XJDV-YFPX
01/01/2024
Apply credit memo related to invoice 17HF-TQXY-
XH9T
($11.35)
17GW-6YYG-XNGH
01/01/2024
Laptop desk stand- Lori B.
$15.27
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$96.63
520 - Resource Recovery
520 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$15.27
570 - Sports Center
570 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$52.36
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$52.33
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$929.38
38822
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Amazon Web Services, Inc.
$1,326.04
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1542976409
01/02/2024
GIS AWS December 1 - December 31, 2023
$1,326.04
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,326.04
38823
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Aquatic Central
$3,000.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
100016
01/15/2024
Facilities - Jan 2024 Library Aquarium Maintenance
$3,000.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$3,000.00
38824
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

B&H PHOTO-VIDEO
$322.28
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
220343618
01/10/2024
1x SEAGATE EXOS 16TB-7200 ENTERPRS SATA
6GB/S
$322.28
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$322.28
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 7 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
38825
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Balance Studios, Inc
$13,333.34
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
4116
01/10/2024
McClellan Ranch AR App Payment 2
$13,333.34
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$13,333.34
38826
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Battery Systems Inc.
$549.75
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
43982401081126
01/08/2024
Fleet- Core Charges & Automotive Junk Exchange
$213.66
35322401101352
01/12/2024
Fleet- 96R-75, S59-EX, Core Charges, Junk Exchange
$336.09
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
630 - Vehicle/Equip Replacement
630 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$549.75
38827
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Bay Area Community Resources
$7,000.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2411151-2
01/10/2024
Sustainability Service Corps
$7,000.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$7,000.00
38828
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
BECK'S SHOES INC.
$800.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
274078-00
01/12/2024
Safety Boots - Ty B, Jared Lopez
$800.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$800.00
38829
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

BOSCO OIL INC DBA VALLEY OIL
$1,986.02
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
618041
01/09/2024
Fleet- Shell Rotella, Recycling Fee, Motor Oil, Drum
Deposits
$1,986.02
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
630 - Vehicle/Equip Replacement
630 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,986.02
38830
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

CHAD MOSLEY
$110.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
ChadM11202023
11/20/2023
Cell Phone Reimbursement through 102123-112023
$55.00
ChadM12202023
12/20/2023
Cell Phone Reimbursement through 112123-122023
$55.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$110.00
38831
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
CobbleStone Systems Corp.
$4,666.66
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
16100
01/01/2024
Cobblestone for Contract Management Platform
1/1/24-1/1/25
$4,666.66
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$4,666.66
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 8 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
38832
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Ecology Action of Santa Cruz
$27,120.56
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
68121
12/31/2023
Pedestrian Safety Training Measure B through Oct.-
Dec. 2023
$27,120.56
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$27,120.56
38833
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Eflex Group, Inc
$4,716.29
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01122024
01/12/2024
FSA pp 12/30/23-1/12/24
$4,716.29
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$4,716.29
38834
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Environmental Systems Research
Institute, Inc.
$27,144.73
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
94641680
01/10/2024
ESRI Maintenance 01/17/2024 - 01/16/2025
$27,144.73
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$27,144.73
38835
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

ESHERICK HOMSEY DODGE AND

DAVIS, ARCHITECTS
$1,570.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
23110005
11/30/2023
Cupertno Library Donor Wall through 110123-113023
$1,570.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
420 - Capital Improvement Fund
420 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,570.00
38836
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
FolgerGraphics
$9,427.79
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
137453
10/19/2023
Become Block Leader Postcards
$584.91
137970
11/30/2023
Cupertino Scene December 2023
$8,842.88
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$9,427.79
38837
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
GOT POWER, INC. DBA CD &

POWER, INC
$14,485.42
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01-83463
01/10/2024
Facilities - City Hall Generator Repair
$14,485.42
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$14,485.42
38838
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

GRAINGER INC
$29.85
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
9960310259
01/11/2024
Service Center - AA Batteries
$29.85
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$29.85
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 9 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
38839
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Grimco, Inc.
$177.88
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
31826267-01
01/10/2024
Streets - Cyan Design Jet Ink
$177.88
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
270 - Transportation Fund
270 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$177.88
38840
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
IFPTE LOCAL 21
$1,937.27
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01122024
01/12/2024
Association Dues - CEA pp 12/30/23-1/12/24
$1,937.27
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,937.27
38841
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
InservH2O Inc.
$834.80
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
3511
01/10/2024
Facilities- Water Treatment Jan 2024
$834.80
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$834.80
38842
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Jarvis Fay LLP
$6,471.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
18434
12/31/2023
Legal Services, December 2023
$4,571.00
18433
12/31/2023
Legal Services for Dec. 2023
$1,900.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$6,471.00
38843
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

KIMBALL-MIDWEST
$891.16
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
101797037
01/09/2024
Street- Lockwasher, Alloy Flat Washers, Thick Flat
Washer
$891.16
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
270 - Transportation Fund
270 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$891.16
38844
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Law Office of Clare M. Gibson
$1,320.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1194
01/01/2024
Legal Services, December 2023
$1,320.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,320.00
38845
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Mearns Consulting LLC
$3,355.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2411
01/15/2024
Professional Consulting Services, Dec 13 2023-Jan 2-
5, 8 2024
$3,355.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$3,355.00
38846
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
MissionSquare
$17,156.77
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01122024
01/12/2024
ICMA pp 12/30/23-1/12/24
$17,156.77
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 10 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$17,156.77
38847
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Nexinite, LLC
$410.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
INV-002377
01/08/2024
FY24 Support for CIP Management Hub December
2023
$410.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$410.00
38848
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Nomad Transit LLC
$204,806.04
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
INV001-9846
12/31/2023
Via Cupertino Shuttle for December 2023
$204,806.04
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$204,806.04
38849
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
ODP Business Solutions, LLC.
$113.94
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
346605841001
12/20/2023
Service Center - Pens, Lanyards
$113.94
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$113.94
38850
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
PARS/City of Cupertino
$2,951.68
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
01122024
01/12/2024
PARS pp 12/30/23-1/12/24
$2,951.68
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$2,951.68
38851
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
PayPal Inc.
$53.20
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
PPGW141206700
12/31/2023
VSV0001160385 cupertinoweb2 01-Dec-23 to 31-Dec-
23 $33.25
PPGW141024828
12/31/2023
VSV0003096477 cupertinoweb4 01-Dec-23 to 31-Dec-
23 $19.95
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$53.20
38852
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable

PLAN JPA
$503.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
PLAN-2024-0127
01/10/2024
General Liability Claims - December 2023
$503.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$503.00
38853
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Professional Turf Management, Inc.
$18,693.56
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1283
12/21/2023
Grounds - Dec 2023 Golf Course Maint.
$18,693.56
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 11 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
560 - Blackberry Farm
560 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$18,693.56
38854
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Quartic Solutions
$1,298.06
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
3807
01/09/2024
FY24 Quartic for GIS Support - December 2023
$1,298.06
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
610 - Innovation & Technology
610 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,298.06
38855
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Recology South Bay
$70,033.75
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
Dec-23 RY3
01/11/2024
City Payment to Recology Rate Year 2/1/23 - 1/31/24-
Dec 2023
$70,033.75
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
520 - Resource Recovery
520 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$70,033.75
38856
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
SCA of CA, LLC
$18,563.57
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
107838CS
12/31/2023
Street Sweeping- December 2023
$18,563.57
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
230 - Env Mgmt Cln Crk Strm Drain
230 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$9,281.78
520 - Resource Recovery
520 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$9,281.79
38857
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
South Bay Youth Sports LLC
$5,088.51
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
56464
01/15/2024
December 2023 Program Payment
$5,088.51
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
580 - Recreation Program
580 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$5,088.51
38858
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Statcomm Inc.
$15,519.13
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
12575217
12/31/2023
Facilities - Library Annual Fire Alarm & Sprinkler
Inspection
$2,541.48
12575235
12/31/2023
Facilities-Sport Center Annual Fire Alarm & Sprinkler
Inspection
$2,436.88
12575229
12/31/2023
Facilities- Comm. Hall Annual Fire Alarm & Sprinkler
Inspection
$1,782.45
12575238
12/31/2023
Facilities- Sen. Center Annual Fire Alarm & Sprinkler
Inspection
$2,810.93
12575232
12/31/2023
Facilities- Monte Vista Annual Fire Alarm & Sprinkler
Inspection
$1,461.87
12575222
12/31/2023
Facilities- City Hall Annual Fire Alarm & Sprinkler
Inspection
$1,862.90
12575241
12/31/2023
Facilities-Serv. Center Annual Fire Alarm & Sprinkler
Inspection
$1,208.44
12575239
12/31/2023
Facilities-E. Ed Center Annual Fire Alarm & Sprinkler
Inspection
$1,414.18
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 12 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$13,082.25
570 - Sports Center
570 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$2,436.88
38859
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
SUNNYVALE FORD, INC.
$478.67
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
231060FOW
01/09/2024
Fleet- PR Filter
$22.41
231271FOW
01/12/2024
Fleet- Separator, Gasket, & Ring
$329.76
231268FOW
01/12/2024
Fleet- HV Hose
$126.50
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
630 - Vehicle/Equip Replacement
630 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$478.67
38860
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Suyesh Shrestha
$81.15
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
SuyeshS12062023
12/06/2023
Cell Phone Reimbursement through 12062023
$40.57
SuyeshS01062024
01/06/2024
Cell Phone Reimbursement through 01062024
$40.58
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$81.15
38861
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
TJKM
$10,230.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0054964
11/30/2023
Apple Campus 2 TDM Monitoring through 11012023-
11302023
$10,230.50
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$10,230.50
38862
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Turf Star, Inc.
$1,039.01
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
7316079-00
01/11/2024
Fleet- Decals, Hoses, V-Belt, Cross Bearing Kit, Idler
$1,039.01
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
630 - Vehicle/Equip Replacement
630 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$1,039.01
38863
01/19/2024
Open
Accounts Payable
Voler Strategic Advisors, Inc
$6,000.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1914
07/03/2023
Communication Strategy and Support, July 2023
$6,000.00
Paying Fund
Cash Account
Amount
100 - General Fund
100 100-100 (Cash & Investments Assets Operating
Cash)
$6,000.00
Type EFT Totals:
51 Transactions
$559,641.22
Main Account - Main Checking Account Totals
Checks
Status
Count
Transaction Amount
Reconciled Amount
Open
36 $1,568,587.20
$0.00
Reconciled
0 $0.00
$0.00
Voided
0 $0.00
$0.00
Stopped
0 $0.00
$0.00
Total
36 $1,568,587.20
$0.00
EFTs
Status
Count
Transaction Amount
Reconciled Amount
Monday, January 22, 2024
Pages: 13 of 14
user: Vi Tran

Payment Register
**LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE**
From Payment Date: 1/13/2024 - To Payment Date: 1/19/2024 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
Open 51 $559,641.22 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 51 $559,641.22 $0.00
All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 87 $2,128,228.42 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 87 $2,128,228.42 $0.00
Grand Totals:

Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 36 $1,568,587.20 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 36 $1,568,587.20 $0.00
EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 51 $559,641.22 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 51 $559,641.22 $0.00
All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 87 $2,128,228.42 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 87 $2,128,228.42 $0.00
Monday, January 22, 2024Pages: 14 of 14user: Vi Tran

The data below was copied from Development Impact Fee Reports from 2014 to 2023 These reports can be found here: https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/finance/budget-reports As there might be copying errors, please consult the source documents to confirm data Observations 1. funds have been used for homeless, which is not an approved category for this fund. 2. Interest on these accounts varies.

Why? Interest from loan or Chandler? 3. 2021 - 2023 staff and admin cost has been disproportionately high as compared with services rendered

4. A significant amount of money has been used for the Housing Element, Studies, Plans, Strategies, and Surveys USE OF BMR FUNDS 2023 - 2014 as reported in Development Impact Fee Reports Year 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Balance 5,462,532 6,111,827 6,551,494 6,759,440 6,902,773 10,867,642 11,336,550 11,323,869 7,699,889 699,046 Fees Collected 172,698 39,211 204,931 41,957 159,179 165,324 39,000 299,586 4,051,266 7,229,545 Interest 79,323 70,915 19,651 269,174 134,016 46,912 94,339 97,840 45,016 10,828 Staff & Admin 378,741 329,346 206,461 90,119 61,276 57,266 39,941 53,908 49,686 25,721 Legal 57,476 29,367 68,170 174,249 69,201 144,028 235,878 96,279 41,276 Placement 265,554 264,296 259,957 190,986 190,294 137,018 123,301 125,818 71,407 127,955 Mediation 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,229 35,771 44,528 203,187 108,740 193,442 Legal + Mediation 69,995
Housing Element 15,879
Loan 3,672,000
Renovation 79,986 122,265
Study 13,495 83,200
Plan 33,291
Strategies 7,146 44,955
De Anza 25,000
Survey 9,706
Homeless 13,787 71,224
Habitat for Humanity 3,571 8,043
Subtotal 769,123 759,421 664,249 519,078 436,528 4,177,105 602,307 384,745 472,302 239,550 End Balance 4,945,424 5,462,532 6,111,827 6,551,494 6,759,440 6,902,773 7,195,642 7,664,550 11,323,869 7,699,889 Subtotal 769,123 759,421 664,249 519,078 436,528
Year 2,023 2022 2021 2020 2019
Staff & Admin 378,741 329,346 206,461 90,119 61,276
Other Expenses 390,382 430,075 457,788 428,959 375,252
0 100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
2,023 2022 2021 2020 2019
Compare Staff/ADMIN Expenses vs Other
from BMR & Affordable Housing Fund
Staff & Admin Other Expenses
G/L Account Number    G/L Date Journal Number Debit Amount   Credit Amount Project AP Invoice Number Vendor Name AP Description AP Invoice Date
AP Payment
Number Amount
265‐72‐711 600‐608 Materials Sml Tools and Equipment 3/14/2023 2023 ‐00003073 97.12$                   ‐ 47348 Advantage Grafix Business Cards ‐ Housing Division 3/1/2023 732174 97.12 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐623 Materials Grant Expenditures 10/27/2021 2022 ‐00001600 15,831.02$           ‐ 440‐502‐093021 PROJECT SENTINEL BMR AHF Rental Mediation Q1 FY21‐22 10/27/2021 728934 15,831.02$ 265‐72‐711 600‐623 Materials Grant Expenditures 2/2/2022 2022 ‐00002521 18,935.55$           ‐ PSCDBGQ2FY2122 PROJECT SENTINEL Below Market Rate Fund (BMR) ‐ Q2 1/25/2022 729555 18,935.55 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐623 Materials Grant Expenditures 6/1/2022 2022 ‐00003874 13,196.29$           ‐ PSQ3FY2122 PROJECT SENTINEL BMR AHF Rental Mediation Q3 FY21‐22 5/26/2022 730367 13,196.29 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐623 Materials Grant Expenditures 6/7/2022 2022 ‐00004162 2,037.14$             ‐ 440‐502‐0622 PROJECT SENTINEL BMR AHF Rental Mediation Q4 FY21‐22 6/13/2022 730542 2,037.14 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐623 Materials Grant Expenditures 11/21/2022 2023 ‐00001776 8,188.50$             ‐ PSCDBGQ1FY2223 PROJECT SENTINEL Below Market Rate Fund (BMR) ‐ Q1 11/14/2022 731521 8,188.50 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐623 Materials Grant Expenditures 2/22/2023 2023 ‐00002820 3,452.85$             ‐ PSCDBGQ2FY2223 PROJECT SENTINEL Below Market Rate Fund (BMR) ‐ Q2 2/21/2023 732070 3,452.85 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐623 Materials Grant Expenditures 5/3/2023 2023 ‐00003662 9,119.74$             ‐ PSCDBGQ3FY2223 PROJECT SENTINEL BMR AHF Rental Mediation ‐ Q3 4/17/2023 732487 9,119.74 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐623 Materials Grant Expenditures 6/30/2023 2023 ‐00004475 29,238.91$           ‐ PSCDBGQ4FY2223 PROJECT SENTINEL BMR AHF Rental Mediation ‐ Q4 7/10/2023 733085 29,238.91 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐623 Materials Grant Expenditures 11/22/2023 2024 ‐00001741 8,961.11$             ‐ 440‐502‐FY24‐Q1 PROJECT SENTINEL Below Market Rate Fund (BMR) ‐ Q1 10/24/2023 733709 8,961.11 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐623 Materials Grant Expenditures 2/15/2024 2024 ‐00002619 7,934.95$             ‐ 440‐502‐FY24‐Q2 PROJECT SENTINEL Below Market Rate Fund (BMR) ‐ Q2 1/19/2024 734114 7,934.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐629 Materials Conference and Training 3/16/2022 2022 ‐00003058 325.00$                ‐ CyrahC031522 US BANK 0363 CC Charges 3/15/2022 34080 325.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐629 Materials Conference and Training 4/20/2022 2022 ‐00003455 57.75$                   ‐ 2022‐00000655 GABRIEL BORDEN Travel Reimbursement Housing California
Annual Conference 04/22 4/20/2022 730161 57.75 $
265‐72‐711 600‐629 Materials Conference and Training 12/20/2022 2023 ‐00002407 900.00$                ‐ CyrahC121522 US BANK 0363 CC Charges 12/15/2022 36158 900.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐629 Materials Conference and Training 1/17/2023 2023 ‐00002477 1,364.20$             ‐ CyrahC011623 US BANK 0363 CC Charges 1/16/2023 36375 1,364.20 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐629 Materials Conference and Training 2/22/2023 2023 ‐00002918 200.00$                ‐ CyrahC021523 US BANK 0363 CC Charges 2/15/2023 36590 200.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐629 Materials Conference and Training 4/12/2023 2023 ‐00003422 233.89$                ‐ AlecV04/10/2023 Alec Vybiral Reimbursement for Housing CA Conference ‐
Alec Vybiral 4/10/2023 36761 233.89 $
265‐72‐711 600‐629 Materials Conference and Training 4/18/2023 2023 ‐00003499 292.57$                ‐ KerriH04132023 KERRI HEUSLER Reimbursement for Housing CA Conference ‐
Kerri Heusler 4/13/2023 36834 292.57 $
265‐72‐711 600‐629 Materials Conference and Training 5/9/2023 2023 ‐00003743 135.00$                ‐ CyrahC041723 US BANK 0363 CC Charges 4/17/2023 37035 135.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 9/1/2021 2022 ‐00000946 12,767.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 003 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2021/07 7/31/2021 32494 12,767.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 9/30/2021 2022 ‐00001256 13,855.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 004 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2021/08 8/31/2021 32680 13,855.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 10/6/2021 2022 ‐00001305 19,822.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 005 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2021/09 9/30/2021 32729 19,822.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 11/2/2021 2022 ‐00001677 17,187.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 006 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2021/10 10/31/2021 32956 17,187.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 12/8/2021 2022 ‐00001985 76,464.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 007 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2021/11 11/30/2021 33206 76,464.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 1/12/2022 2022 ‐00002312 18,596.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 008 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2021/12 12/31/2021 33429 18,596.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 3/2/2022 2022 ‐00002849 15,830.00$           ‐ Cupertino‐009 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/01 1/31/2022 33775 15,830.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 3/8/2022 2022 ‐00002894 12,755.00$           ‐ Cupertino‐010 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/02 2/28/2022 33819 12,755.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 4/6/2022 2022 ‐00003200 12,214.00$           ‐ Cupertino‐011 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/03 3/31/2022 34019 12,214.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 5/3/2022 2022 ‐00003793 14,030.00$           ‐ Cupertino‐012 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/04 4/30/2022 34381 14,030.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 6/1/2022 2022 ‐00003874 19,084.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 013 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/05 5/31/2022 34431 19,084.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 6/30/2022 2022 ‐00004244 31,692.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 014 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/06 FY21‐
22 6/30/2022 34666 31,692.00 $
265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 9/7/2022 2023 ‐00000936 18,597.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 015 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/07 7/31/2022 35189 18,597.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 9/7/2022 2023 ‐00000936 11,342.50$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 016 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/08 8/31/2022 35189 11,342.50 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 10/4/2022 2023 ‐00001268 25,135.00$           ‐ Cupertino‐017 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/09 9/30/2022 35416 25,135.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 11/30/2022 2023 ‐00001855 84,332.50$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 018 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/10 11/15/2022 35832 84,332.50 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 12/6/2022 2023 ‐00001931 13,052.50$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 019 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/11 11/30/2022 35885 13,052.50 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 1/11/2023 2023 ‐00002407 9,525.00$             ‐ Cupertino ‐ 020 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2022/12 12/31/2022 36150 9,525.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 2/7/2023 2023 ‐00002672 10,420.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 021 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2023/01 1/31/2023 36308 10,420.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 3/14/2023 2023 ‐00003075 15,500.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 022 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2023/02 2/28/2023 36581 15,500.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 4/12/2023 2023 ‐00003422 43,670.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 023 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator ‐ March 2023 3/31/2023 36795 43,670.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 5/3/2023 2023 ‐00003662 10,730.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 024 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2023/04 4/30/2023 36959 10,730.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 5/24/2023 2023 ‐00004077 17,860.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 025 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2023/05 5/31/2023 37238 17,860.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 6/30/2023 2023 ‐00004484 5,390.00$             ‐ Cupertino ‐ 026 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2023/06 6/30/2023 37674 5,390.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 8/9/2023 2024 ‐00000487 17,579.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 027 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2023/07 7/31/2023 37705 17,579.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 9/5/2023 2024 ‐00000816 18,357.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 028 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2023/08 8/31/2023 37916 18,357.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 9/28/2023 2024 ‐00001128 14,777.50$           ‐ Cupertino‐029 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2023/09 9/30/2023 38122 14,777.50 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 11/2/2023 2024 ‐00001600 75,600.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 030 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2023/10 10/31/2023 38447 75,600.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 12/4/2023 2024 ‐00001822 18,832.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 031 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2023/11 11/30/2023 38579 18,832.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 1/8/2024 2024 ‐00002152 15,635.00$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 032 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2023/12 12/31/2023 38799 15,635.00 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐635 Materials Special Departmental Exp 1/31/2024 2024 ‐00002477 13,971.50$           ‐ Cupertino ‐ 033 Rise Housing Solutions, Inc BMR Program Administrator 2024/01 1/31/2024 39002 13,971.50 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 9/1/2021 2022 ‐00000988 38.01$                   ‐ 9885531295‐54 VERIZON WIRELESS 4084664906 Kerri Heusler Housing Planner 8/4/2021 728645 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 9/30/2021 2022 ‐00001256 38.01$                   ‐ 9887702825‐51 VERIZON WIRELESS 4084664906 Kerri Heusler Housing Planner 9/4/2021 728766 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 10/20/2021 2022 ‐00001420 38.01$                   ‐ 9889887003‐51 VERIZON WIRELESS 4084664906 Kerri Heusler Housing Planner 10/4/2021 728891 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 12/2/2021 2022 ‐00001946 38.01$                   ‐ 9892089028‐51 VERIZON WIRELESS 4084664906 Kerri Heusler Housing Planner 11/4/2021 729222 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 1/18/2022 2022 ‐00002355 38.01$                   ‐ 9894310849‐59 VERIZON WIRELESS 4084664906 Kerri Heusler Housing Planner 12/4/2021 729478 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 2/2/2022 2022 ‐00002519 38.01$                   ‐ 9896551278‐59 VERIZON WIRELESS 4084664906 Kerri Heusler Housing Planner 1/4/2022 729570 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 2/23/2022 2022 ‐00002778 38.01$                   ‐ 9898794026‐59 VERIZON WIRELESS 4084664906 Kerri Heusler Housing Planner 2/4/2022 729716 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 3/15/2022 2022 ‐00002994 27.14$                   ‐ 9901054103‐58 VERIZON WIRELESS 4084664906 Kerri Heusler Housing Planner 3/4/2022 729850 27.14 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 5/2/2022 2022 ‐00003542 10.87$                   ‐ 9901054104‐58 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 3/4/2022 730203 10.87 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 5/3/2022 2022 ‐00003542 38.01$                   ‐ 9903371206‐59 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 4/4/2022 730203 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 5/16/2022 2022 ‐00003714 38.01$                   ‐ 9905703460‐58 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 5/4/2022 730285 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 6/14/2022 2022 ‐00004160 38.01$                   ‐ 9908045553‐59 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 6/4/2022 730548 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 6/30/2022 2023 ‐00000245 38.01$                   ‐ 9910352420‐57 VERIZON WIRELESS FY21‐22 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 7/4/2022 730725 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 8/22/2022 2023 ‐00000778 38.01$                   ‐ 9912680067‐58 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 8/4/2022 730951 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 9/19/2022 2023 ‐00001098 38.01$                   ‐ 9915014797‐58 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 9/4/2022 731130 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 10/11/2022 2023 ‐00001464 38.01$                   ‐ 9917376693‐58 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 10/4/2022 731336 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 11/14/2022 2023 ‐00001713 38.01$                   ‐ 9919754045‐58 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 11/4/2022 731463 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 1/3/2023 2023 ‐00002142 38.01$                   ‐ 9922133976‐58 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 12/4/2022 731747 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 2/16/2023 2023 ‐00002820 38.01$                   ‐ 9926893234‐58 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 2/4/2023 732078 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 3/27/2023 2023 ‐00003228 38.01$                   ‐ 9929285853‐57 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 3/4/2023 732308 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 4/17/2023 2023 ‐00003660 38.01$                   ‐ 9931706970‐57 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 4/4/2023 732499 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 6/1/2023 2023 ‐00004075 27.88$                   ‐ 9934094492‐53 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 5/4/2023 732725 27.88 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐642 Materials Telphone and Data Services 6/30/2023 2023 ‐00004444 38.01$                   ‐ 9924517994‐58 VERIZON WIRELESS 408‐466‐4906 / K. Housing Planner 1/4/2023 733058 38.01 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 7/27/2021 2021 ‐00004967 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP071521 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 7/15/2021 32274 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 9/9/2021 2022 ‐00001103 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP081621 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 8/16/2021 32594 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 12/2/2021 2022 ‐00001985 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP111521 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 11/15/2021 33216 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 1/6/2022 2022 ‐00002311 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP121521 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 12/15/2021 33436 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 1/12/2022 2022 ‐00002311 75.00$                   ‐ 5492 MMANC Membership Renewal ‐ Kerri (through
1/27/2023) 12/14/2021 729416 75.00 $
265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 2/3/2022 2022 ‐00002639 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP011722 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 1/17/2022 33626 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 3/4/2022 2022 ‐00002894 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP021522 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 2/15/2022 33828 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 3/28/2022 2022 ‐00003146 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP031522 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 3/15/2022 34080 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 5/5/2022 2022 ‐00003628 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP041522 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 4/15/2022 34280 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 6/2/2022 2022 ‐00003937 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP051622 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 5/16/2022 34499 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 6/20/2022 2022 ‐00004162 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP061522 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 6/15/2022 34623 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 7/25/2022 2023 ‐00000329 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP07152022 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 7/15/2022 34878 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 8/22/2022 2023 ‐00000867 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP081522 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 8/15/2022 35262 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 10/4/2022 2023 ‐00001268 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP091522 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 9/15/2022 35479 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 10/28/2022 2023 ‐00001621 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP101722 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 10/17/2022 35690 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 11/30/2022 2023 ‐00002013 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP111522 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 11/15/2022 35938 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 12/20/2022 2023 ‐00002090 75.00$                   ‐ 7032 MMANC Membership Renewal ‐ Kerri Heusler
(through January 27, 2024) 12/14/2022 731690 75.00 $
265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 1/5/2023 2023 ‐00002407 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP121522 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 12/15/2022 36158 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 2/1/2023 2023 ‐00002672 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP011623 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 1/16/2023 36375 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 3/8/2023 2023 ‐00002992 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP021523 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 2/15/2023 36590 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 4/4/2023 2023 ‐00003313 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP031523 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 3/15/2023 36800 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 4/28/2023 2023 ‐00003662 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP041723 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 4/17/2023 37035 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 6/7/2023 2023 ‐00004077 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP051523 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 5/15/2023 37315 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 6/29/2023 2023 ‐00004395 27.86$                   ‐ SundariP061523 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 6/15/2023 37524 27.86 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 7/31/2023 2024 ‐00000487 28.79$                   ‐ SundariP07172023 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 7/17/2023 37774 28.79 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 10/2/2023 2024 ‐00001128 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP091523 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 9/15/2023 38187 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 10/25/2023 2024 ‐00001455 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP101623 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 10/16/2023 38382 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 12/6/2023 2024 ‐00001822 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP111523 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 11/15/2023 38645 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 12/31/2023 2024 ‐00002064 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP121523 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 12/15/2023 38810 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 600‐647 Materials Memberships and Dues 2/2/2024 2024 ‐00002479 9.95$                     ‐ SundariP011524 US BANK 9702 CC Charges 1/15/2024 39066 9.95 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 8/18/2021 2022 ‐00000734 1,906.00$             ‐ 129236 FolgerGraphics CWP Mailer for Housing Survey 6/8/2021 32376 1,906.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 9/8/2021 2022 ‐00000988 1,050.00$             ‐ 2149 City Data Services, LLC CDS Monthly Maintenance 2021 July ‐ Sep 8/15/2021 728632 1,050.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 9/15/2021 2022 ‐00001105 3,000.00$             ‐ 2021‐4 COLLEEN LOPEZ CDBG Consultant 2021/07‐08 9/1/2021 728668 3,000.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 9/15/2021 2022 ‐00004471 1,200.00$             ‐ 2021‐4 COLLEEN LOPEZ CDBG Consultant 2021/07‐08 9/1/2021 728668 1,200.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 9/15/2021 2022 ‐00004471 3,000.00 $         ‐ 2021‐4 COLLEEN LOPEZ CDBG Consultant 2021/07‐08 9/1/2021 728668 (3,000.00) $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 10/6/2021 2022 ‐00001305 493.00$                ‐ 141596 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2021/07 8/24/2021 32717 493.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 10/6/2021 2022 ‐00001305 522.00$                ‐ 141058 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2021/06 7/12/2021 32717 522.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 10/13/2021 2022 ‐00001347 58.00$                   ‐ 141844 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2021/08 9/17/2021 32765 58.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 10/20/2021 2022 ‐00001420 725.00$                ‐ 142109 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2021/09 10/11/2021 32820 725.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/2/2021 2022 ‐00001677 735.00$                ‐ 142111 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2021/09 10/11/2021 32940 735.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/16/2021 2022 ‐00001815 3,600.00$             ‐ 2021‐5 COLLEEN LOPEZ Housing Consultant 2021/09‐10 11/15/2021 729117 3,600.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/16/2021 2022 ‐00004471 1,200.00$             ‐ 2021‐5 COLLEEN LOPEZ Housing Consultant 2021/09‐10 11/15/2021 729117 1,200.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/16/2021 2022 ‐00004471 3,600.00 $         ‐ 2021‐5 COLLEEN LOPEZ Housing Consultant 2021/09‐10 11/15/2021 729117 (3,600.00)$ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/30/2021 2022 ‐00001946 1,050.00$             ‐ 2178 City Data Services, LLC CDS Monthly Maintenance 2021 Oct ‐ Dec 11/15/2021 33128 1,050.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/30/2021 2022 ‐00001946 352.00$                ‐ 142638 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Services 2021/10 11/15/2021 33134 352.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/30/2021 2022 ‐00001946 551.00$                ‐ 142636 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Services 2021/10 11/15/2021 33134 551.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 12/15/2021 2022 ‐00002087 1,200.00$             ‐ 2021‐6 COLLEEN LOPEZ Housing Consultant 2021/11 12/10/2021 729287 1,200.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 12/15/2021 2022 ‐00004471 600.00$                ‐ 2021‐6 COLLEEN LOPEZ Housing Consultant 2021/11 12/10/2021 729287 600.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 12/15/2021 2022 ‐00004471 1,200.00 $         ‐ 2021‐6 COLLEEN LOPEZ Housing Consultant 2021/11 12/10/2021 729287 (1,200.00)$ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/12/2022 2022 ‐00002312 406.00$                ‐ 143181 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2021/11 12/23/2021 33404 406.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/12/2022 2022 ‐00002312 576.00$                ‐ 143182 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2021/11 12/23/2021 33404 576.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/19/2022 2022 ‐00002355 1,680.00$             ‐ 143426 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2021/12 1/12/2022 33463 1,680.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/26/2022 2022 ‐00002472 899.00$                ‐ 143693 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2021/12 1/21/2022 33497 899.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 3/2/2022 2022 ‐00002849 600.00$                ‐ 2021‐7 COLLEEN LOPEZ CDBG Housing Consultant 2021/12 2/1/2022 729729 600.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 3/2/2022 2022 ‐00004455 600.00 $             ‐ 2021‐7 COLLEEN LOPEZ CDBG Housing Consultant 2021/12 2/1/2022 729729 (600.00) $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 3/2/2022 2022 ‐00004471 120.00$                ‐ 2021‐7 COLLEEN LOPEZ CDBG Housing Consultant 2021/12 2/1/2022 729729 120.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 3/16/2022 2022 ‐00002994 600.00$                ‐ 2021‐8 COLLEEN LOPEZ CDBG Housing Consultant 2022/01‐02 3/7/2022 729824 600.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 4/6/2022 2022 ‐00003200 1,050.00$             ‐ 2211 City Data Services, LLC CDS Monthly Maintenance 2022 Jan ‐
March 2/15/2022 33996 1,050.00 $
265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 4/28/2022 2022 ‐00003544 384.00$                ‐ 144851 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2022/03 4/18/2022 34212 384.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 5/25/2022 2022 ‐00003793 3,616.00$             ‐ 144110 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2022/01 2/24/2022 34353 3,616.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 6/1/2022 2022 ‐00003874 992.00$                ‐ 145313 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2022/05 5/24/2022 34413 992.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 6/30/2022 2022 ‐00004306 288.00$                ‐ 145776 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2022/05 FY21‐22 6/30/2022 34749 288.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 6/30/2022 2022 ‐00004306 2,560.00$             ‐ 145777 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP BMR Housing Legal Review 2022/05 FY21‐
22 6/30/2022 34749 2,560.00 $
265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 6/30/2022 2022 ‐00004433 960.00$                ‐ 146187 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP FY21‐22 Housing Legal Review 2022/05 7/29/2022 35056 960.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 6/30/2022 2023 ‐00000245 1,050.00$             ‐ 2231 City Data Services, LLC FY21‐22 CDS Monthly Maintenance 2022
April‐June 3/28/2022 34793 1,050.00 $
265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 6/30/2022 2023 ‐00000326 1,984.00$             ‐ 144707 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP FY21‐22 Housing Legal Review 2022/04 4/14/2022 34861 1,984.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 6/30/2022 2023 ‐00000326 1,760.00$             ‐ 146110 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP FY21‐22 Housing Legal Review 2022/06 7/25/2022 34861 1,760.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 8/18/2022 2023 ‐00000778 1,275.00$             ‐ 2289 City Data Services, LLC CDS Monthly Maintenance 2022 July‐Sept 8/15/2022 35069 1,275.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/8/2022 2023 ‐00001621 892.00$                ‐ 146262 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2022/07 8/12/2022 35665 892.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/8/2022 2023 ‐00001621 714.00$                ‐ 458952 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2022/09 10/28/2022 35665 714.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/8/2022 2023 ‐00001621 136.00$                ‐ 459229 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2022/09 10/31/2022 35665 136.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/21/2022 2023 ‐00001776 1,275.00$             ‐ 2330 City Data Services, LLC CDS Monthly Maintenance 2022 Oct‐Dec 11/15/2022 35761 1,275.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/11/2023 2023 ‐00002407 306.00$                ‐ 460429 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2022/11 12/30/2022 36128 306.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/24/2023 2023 ‐00002477 442.00$                ‐ 461402 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2022/12 1/18/2023 36185 442.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/24/2023 2023 ‐00002477 2,138.00$             ‐ 457757 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2022/08 10/5/2022 36185 2,138.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 2/22/2023 2023 ‐00002820 1,275.00$             ‐ 2366 City Data Services, LLC CDS Monthly Maintenance 2023 Jan‐Mar 2/15/2023 36388 1,275.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 3/14/2023 2023 ‐00003075 63.00$                   ‐ 462738 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/02 3/9/2023 36560 63.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 5/16/2023 2023 ‐00003834 1,275.00$             ‐ 2404 City Data Services, LLC CDS Monthly Maintenance 2023 Apr‐Jun 5/15/2023 37055 1,275.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 5/24/2023 2023 ‐00003915 7,062.00$             ‐ 464209 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/04 5/16/2023 37114 7,062.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 6/30/2023 2023 ‐00004475 238.00$                ‐ 465713 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/06 7/18/2023 37598 238.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 6/30/2023 2023 ‐00004475 9,185.50$             ‐ 465777 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/06 7/18/2023 37598 9,185.50 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 6/30/2023 2023 ‐00004475 32,850.00$           ‐ 464881 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/04 6/27/2023 37598 32,850.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 8/24/2023 2024 ‐00000743 10,172.00$           ‐ 466488 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/07 8/17/2023 37838 10,172.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 9/25/2023 2024 ‐00001128 1,275.00$             ‐ 2461 City Data Services, LLC CDS Monthly Maintenance 2023 Jul‐Sept 8/15/2023 38107 1,275.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 9/28/2023 2024 ‐00001128 12,093.50$           ‐ 467225 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/08 9/18/2023 38111 12,093.50 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 10/23/2023 2024 ‐00001455 39,173.00$           ‐ 467944 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/09 10/19/2023 38315 39,173.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 11/22/2023 2024 ‐00001741 35,050.00$           ‐ 468648 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/10 11/16/2023 38514 35,050.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 12/20/2023 2024 ‐00002064 2,607.00$             ‐ 469410 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/11 12/20/2023 38735 2,607.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 12/20/2023 2024 ‐00002064 409.50$                ‐ 463698 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/4 (2) 4/25/2023 38735 409.50 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 12/20/2023 2024 ‐00002064 787.50$                ‐ 469494 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/11 (2) 12/20/2023 38735 787.50 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/11/2024 2024 ‐00002327 306.00$                ‐ 470030 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/12 1/16/2024 38884 306.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/11/2024 2024 ‐00002327 94.50$                   ‐ 470181 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/12 (2) 1/18/2024 38884 94.50 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/11/2024 2024 ‐00002327 2,282.00$             ‐ 470094 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2023/12 (3) 1/18/2024 38884 2,282.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/17/2024 2024 ‐00002247 9,000.00$             ‐ Stipulated_Judgm California Housing Defense Fund Stipulated Judgment re 23CV410817 1/2/2024 733921 9,000.00 $ 265‐72‐711 700‐702 Contract Services General Service
Agreement 1/17/2024 2024 ‐00002247 6,000.00$             ‐ Stipulated_Judgm Yes In My Back Yard Stipulated Judgment re 23CV410817 1/2/2024 733946 6,000.00 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐050 Special Projects Housing Strategies 10/6/2021 2022 ‐00001305 4,704.00$             ‐ 141599 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Strategies Legal Review 2021/07 8/24/2021 32717 4,704.00 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐050 Special Projects Housing Strategies 10/13/2021 2022 ‐00001347 2,440.72$             ‐ 141845 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP CWP Housing Strategies Legal Review
2021/08 9/17/2021 32765 2,440.72 $
265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 3/2/2022 2022 ‐00002849 6,278.60$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 1745 Homebase
CWP end homelessness administrator
2021/12 2/9/2022 729777 6,278.60 $
265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 3/2/2022 2022 ‐00002849 9,476.10$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 1751 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2022/01 2/15/2022 729777 9,476.10 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 3/30/2022 2022 ‐00003146 21,445.77$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 1789 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2022/02 3/17/2022 33956 21,445.77 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 4/20/2022 2022 ‐00003455 12,563.81$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 1834 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2022/03 4/14/2022 34154 12,563.81 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 5/25/2022 2022 ‐00003793 13,109.32$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 1872 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2022/04 5/10/2022 34358 13,109.32 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 6/7/2022 2022 ‐00004162 6,002.34$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 1928 Homebase CWP Homeless Administrator 2022/05 6/10/2022 34581 6,002.34 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 6/30/2022 2022 ‐00004306 2,348.12$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 1982 Homebase
CWP  Homelessness Administrator 2022/06
FY21‐22 7/5/2022 34751 2,348.12 $
265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 8/18/2022 2023 ‐00000778 2,346.68$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 2035 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2022/07 8/10/2022 35074 2,346.68 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 9/27/2022 2023 ‐00001183 923.82$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 2083 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2022/08 9/14/2022 35340 923.82 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 11/21/2022 2023 ‐00001776 536.55$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 2175 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2022/10 11/9/2022 35772 536.55 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 12/20/2022 2023 ‐00002090 766.99$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 2210 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2022/11 12/7/2022 35973 766.99 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 2/22/2023 2023 ‐00002820 497.79$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 2253 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2022/12 2/8/2023 36400 497.79 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 2/22/2023 2023 ‐00002820 303.30$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 2294 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2023/01 2/8/2023 36400 303.30 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 4/3/2023 2023 ‐00003313 626.50$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 2343 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2023/02 3/10/2023 36725 626.50 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 4/26/2023 2023 ‐00003587 1,532.58$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 2390 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2023/03 4/12/2023 36886 1,532.58 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 5/24/2023 2023 ‐00004077 5,672.66$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 2434 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2023/04 5/18/2023 37215 5,672.66 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐051 Special Projects Support for the
Unhoused 6/21/2023 2023 ‐00004251 579.64$
WP22 007 ‐ City
Plan to End
Homelessness 2480 Homebase CWP Homelessness Administrator 2023/05 6/12/2023 37343 579.64 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐052 Special Projects Develop ELI Housing 10/28/2021 2022 ‐00001675 2,100.00$ WP20 037 ‐ Build
ELI Housing for
Developmentally
Disabled 16726 GIULIANI & KULL ‐ SAN JOSE, INC.

Mary Ave. Street Realignment through
080121‐083121 9/30/2021 32939 2,100.00 $
265‐72‐711 750‐052 Special Projects Develop ELI Housing 11/18/2021 2022 ‐00001877 2,230.00$ WP20 037 ‐ Build
ELI Housing for
Developmentally
Disabled 16757 GIULIANI & KULL ‐ SAN JOSE, INC.

Mary Avenue Street Realignment through
090121‐093021 10/31/2021 33080 2,230.00 $
265‐72‐711 750‐052 Special Projects Develop ELI Housing 1/6/2022 2022 ‐00002312 3,713.00$ WP20 037 ‐ Build
ELI Housing for
Developmentally
Disabled 16819 GIULIANI & KULL ‐ SAN JOSE, INC.

Mary Ave Street Realignment through
110121‐113021 12/25/2021 33403 3,713.00 $
265‐72‐711 750‐052 Special Projects Develop ELI Housing 8/18/2022 2023 ‐00000778 238.00$ WP20 037 ‐ Build
ELI Housing for
Developmentally
Disabled 146236 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Housing Legal Review 2022/07 8/12/2022 35073 238.00 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐052 Special Projects Develop ELI Housing 8/25/2022 2023 ‐00000865 632.00$ WP20 037 ‐ Build
ELI Housing for
Developmentally
Disabled 17014 GIULIANI & KULL ‐ SAN JOSE, INC.

Mary Avenue Street Realignment through
060122‐063022 7/31/2022 35121 632.00 $
265‐72‐711 750‐052 Special Projects Develop ELI Housing 4/17/2023 2023 ‐00003497 697.50$ WP20 037 ‐ Build
ELI Housing for
Developmentally
Disabled 17256 GIULIANI & KULL ‐ SAN JOSE, INC.
20117 Mary Ave Legal Description through
02012023‐02282023 3/31/2023 36827 697.50 $
265‐72‐711 750‐052 Special Projects Develop ELI Housing 5/10/2023 2023 ‐00003834 1,925.62$ WP20 037 ‐ Build
ELI Housing for
Developmentally
Disabled FWPS‐TO23000152 Chicago Title Company Map & Title Review 5/10/2023 732579 1,925.62 $ 265‐72‐711 750‐052 Special Projects Develop ELI Housing 6/30/2023 2023 ‐00004426 77.50$ WP20 037 ‐ Build
ELI Housing for
Developmentally
Disabled 17316 GIULIANI & KULL ‐ SAN JOSE, INC.
20117 Mary Ave Legal Description through
04012023‐04302023 5/31/2023 37496 77.50 $
From: Kirsten Squarcia
To: City Clerk
Subject: FW: Approve Housing Commission Funding Recommendation for Mary Avenue Villas Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:36:51 PM
Attachments: image014.png
image015.png
image016.png
image017.png
image018.png
image019.png
image020.png
image021.png
image022.png
image023.png
image024.png
image025.png
PHP Letter - Mary Ave Villas.pdf

Kirsten Squarcia
City Clerk
City Manager's Office
[email protected]
(408) 777-3225

From: J.R. Fruen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:17 PM
To: Kirsten Squarcia <[email protected]>; Lauren Sapudar <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Approve Housing Commission Funding Recommendation for Mary Avenue Villas

This letter is relevant to Item 12. Could you please include it in the record for today?

J.R. Fruen
Councilmember
City Council
[email protected]
(408)777-1316

From: Beverly Wong <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 12:50 PM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Subject: Approve Housing Commission Funding Recommendation for Mary Avenue Villas

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Cupertino City Council Members,

Attached is a letter from Parents Helping Parents in support of the $3 million funding allocation recommendation by the Housing Commission for Mary Avenue Villas.

Sincerely,
Beverly Wong
--

Beverly Wong
Advocacy & Civic Participation Manager
PHP - Parents Helping Parents
www.php.com

Buy PHP Gala Tickets Today!

Parents Helping Parents (PHP) is a nonprofit organization that provides information, training, individual assistance, and resources. PHP is not a law firm or legal service agency, and as such, the information contained in this email or in phone conversations is provided for the purpose of informing the review, but should not be considered legal advice. For legal advice, you should consult an attorney.

Parents Helping Parents, Inc.

Sobrato Center for Nonprofits – San Jose ~ 1400 Parkmoor Avenue, Suite 100, San Jose, CA 95126 Telephone (408) 727-5775 ~ Fax (408) 286-1116
www.php.com ~ A 501(c)3 nonprofit agency

April 15, 2025

Dear Cupertino City Council Members,

I am writing on behalf of Parents Helping Parents to express my strong support for the Mary Avenue Villas project and to urge the City Council to approve the funding allocations recommended by the Housing Commission.

Parents Helping Parents has been helping families of children with special needs since 1976. Our mission is to help children and adults with special needs receive support and services they need to reach their full potential by providing information, training, and resources to build strong families and improve systems of care. We are the Parent Training and Information Center (PTI) for families whose children are experiencing disabilities in five counties: Santa Clara, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, San Benito, and Monterey. Our main office is in San Jose and we have satellite offices in East San Jose and Gilroy.

Mary Avenue Villas will bring over 40 affordable homes to Cupertino, including 19 units specifically for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). It’s a crucial step in addressing the need for affordable and supportive housing in our community.

This project will provide permanent housing and services that help adults with IDD live independently, with dignity, and stay connected to their community. In Cupertino, 70% of adults with developmental disabilities still live with aging parents. As these parents get older, their children face an uncertain future. This project will give them a safe and stable place to live.

There are 325 individuals with developmental disabilities in Cupertino, including 122 adults.

Sadly, only a few live independently. Mary Avenue Villas is a chance to begin addressing this gap and provide long-term housing solutions for those who need it most.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Parents Helping Parents, Inc.

Sobrato Center for Nonprofits – San Jose ~ 1400 Parkmoor Avenue, Suite 100, San Jose, CA 95126 Telephone (408) 727-5775 ~ Fax (408) 286-1116
www.php.com ~ A 501(c)3 nonprofit agency

Sincerely,

Beverly Wong
Advocacy & Civic Participation Manager
[email protected]
(408) 727-5775

From: Gia Pham
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Item 12: Approve Funding for Mary Avenue Villas to Support those with IDD Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:15:00 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Cupertino City Council Members,
I’m writing to express my strong support for the Mary Avenue Villas project and to respectfully urge you to approve the $3 million in funding recommended by the Housing Commission.

Mary Avenue Villas will bring over 40 affordable homes to Cupertino, including 19 units dedicated to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).

These homes are not just buildings—they represent life-changing opportunities for people who have waited far too long for the chance to live independently and with dignity in the communities they love and call home.

In my work, I connect every day with people who have IDD. I hear their hopes and dreams, support them in their search for housing, and witness the deep discouragement when those doors remain closed. These are individuals with incredible potential—people who want to contribute, belong, and live with pride and purpose. But with most living on just over $1,000 a month through SSI, the reality is that they are priced out of nearly every housing option. Without deeply affordable housing, their path to independence remains out of reach.

Mary Avenue Villas is intentionally designed to serve these extremely low-income residents—and this kind of inclusive, accessible housing is exactly what our community needs. To make this level of affordability possible, sufficient funding is essential. The City’s $3 million investment is not only reasonable—it’s necessary to help bring this shovel-ready project to life.

Catching- Up
This isn’t setting an unsustainable, financial precedent—it’s correcting an overdue imbalance.

The idea that approving $3 million for Mary Avenue Villas sets an unsustainable, financial precedent overlooks a critical truth and the definition of a precedent:

Cupertino is not ahead of the curve— we are not venturing into new territory - We’re catching up. Cities across the Bay Area have long been investing deeply in housing solutions for their most vulnerable populations, including individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).

Other jurisdictions have prioritized local funding to unlock state and federal dollars, build inclusive housing, and honor the principle that people with disabilities deserve to live independently in the communities they grew up in. Cupertino has fallen behind in that effort—not due to a lack of care, but a lack of action. This project is our opportunity to begin closing that gap.

If we’re going to talk about precedent, let’s be clear: the precedent we’re setting is one of moral clarity, fiscal responsibility (through leveraged dollars), and long-term community benefit.

Equality vs. Equity
The question of whether it is “fair” to allocate a larger share of funding to Mary Avenue Villas and showcasing funding/unit as a means against this is rooted in the idea that all projects should receive the same amount of funding per unit. But this approach reflects a framework of equality, not equity.

Equality assumes every project should receive the same resources, regardless of the population served or the level of affordability being provided. Equity, on the other hand, asks a more meaningful question: Where is the need greatest, and how can we allocate resources accordingly?
Mary Avenue Villas is designed specifically to meet the needs of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), many of whom live on just over $1,000 a month. Creating housing that is truly accessible and supportive for this population requires deeper subsidies—and the per-unit cost reflects that necessity.

By contrast, applying a standardized per-unit funding amount ignores the unique challenges of serving extremely low-income residents with higher support needs. That approach might treat all projects the same, but it fails to meet people where they are —and it fails to make building extremely low-income housing feasible.

Equity means responding to historical underinvestment and addressing the systemic barriers faced by the most vulnerable. Mary Avenue Villas does exactly that.

Conclusion
Please approve the $3 million in funding for Mary Avenue Villas and help turn this vital project into a reality. This is an investment in equity, community, and compassion that will benefit not just the individuals who will call Mary Avenue Villas home, but the entire Cupertino community.
“We live in a world in which we need to share responsibility. It’s easy to say ‘It’s not my child, not my community, not my world, not my problem.’ Then there are those who see the need and respond. I consider those people my heroes.” Thank you so much for your time and thoughtful consideration. I deeply appreciate your efforts and your commitment to building a more inclusive and compassionate community.

Warm Regards,
Gia Pham

From: J.R. Fruen
To: Kirsten Squarcia; Lauren Sapudar
Subject: FW: Approve Housing Commission Funding Recommendation for Mary Avenue Villas Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:16:43 PM
Attachments: PHP Letter - Mary Ave Villas.pdf
This letter is relevant to Item 12. Could you please include it in the record for today? J.R. Fruen
Councilmember
City

Council
[email protected]
(408)777-1316
From:

Beverly Wong <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 12:50 PM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Subject: Approve Housing Commission Funding Recommendation for Mary Avenue Villas CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Cupertino City Council Members,
Attached is a letter from Parents Helping Parents in support of the $3 million funding allocation recommendation by the Housing Commission for Mary Avenue Villas.

Sincerely,
Beverly Wong
--
Beverly Wong
Advocacy & Civic Participation Manager
PHP - Parents Helping Parents
www.php.com

Parents Helping Parents, Inc.

Sobrato Center for Nonprofits – San Jose ~ 1400 Parkmoor Avenue, Suite 100, San Jose, CA 95126 Telephone (408) 727-5775 ~ Fax (408) 286-1116
www.php.com ~ A 501(c)3 nonprofit agency

April 15, 2025

Dear Cupertino City Council Members,

There are 325 individuals with developmental disabilities in Cupertino, including 122 adults.

Sadly, only a few live independently. Mary Avenue Villas is a chance to begin addressing this gap and provide long-term housing solutions for those who need it most.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Parents Helping Parents, Inc.

Sobrato Center for Nonprofits – San Jose ~ 1400 Parkmoor Avenue, Suite 100, San Jose, CA 95126 Telephone (408) 727-5775 ~ Fax (408) 286-1116
www.php.com ~ A 501(c)3 nonprofit agency

Sincerely,

Beverly Wong
Advocacy & Civic Participation Manager
[email protected]
(408) 727-5775

CC 04-15-2025
Item No. 13
Direct Staff on Commission
Review of the Stevens
Creek Blvd Corridor Vision
Study
Written Communications
From: Jennifer Griffin
To: City Council; City Clerk
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study
Date: Thursday, April 10, 2025 8:55:27 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
(Please include the following as public input for Item Number 13 on the City Council Agenda for 4/15/2025. Thank you.)
Dear City Council:

I am sending this email in response to Item 13 on the Cupertino City Council Agenda for 4/15/25 on the Stevens Creek Blvd. Corridor Vision Study. I am very concerned that Declaring a dedicated bus only lane on Stevens Creek Blvd. would allow Senator Wiener's New bill SB 79 to be enacted along Stevens Creek Blvd.

The text in this new proposed bill is so convoluted it says that any bus line on a road With a dedicated bus lane on any part of it becomes a Tier 1 or Tier 2 bus transit line and That any land 1/4 or 1/2 mile from the roadway can be upzoned to high density and The building height be increased dramatically. Bus line 23 and 523 would become A bus line that could allow SB 79 to be applied ministerially along any part of Stevens Creek Blvd. And probably San Carlos also.

In the August, 2024 Stevens Creek Advisory Committee meeting in Cupertino there were many People who showed up (like 50) demanding that one lane of Stevens Creek Blvd. be made a Dedicated bus only lane. I attended the Stevens Creek Blvd. Vision Study meetings and I had Never seen many of these people there before. And no one ever talked in depth about Having one lane of Stevens Creek Blvd. be made just for buses. We never talked about that.

I know. I was there. That is why I was so surprised to see all these people, many from other Cities, like South San Francisco and Campbell, just saying one thing, I want bus rapid transit on Stevens Creek Blvd, one lane needs to be closed for this. I thought it was very strange that These people who didn't even live near Stevens Creek Blvd. were demanding one lane of Stevens Creek Blvd. be shut down for only buses.

These people hadn't even bothered to come to any of the Stevens Creek Blvd. Corridor meetings And now they show up at one meeting demanding one lane of Stevens Creek Blvd. be shut down? The rest of us wasted our time going to all these meetings and this group of people Who didn't even go to the meetings show up and start demanding things? Why should they be Catered to? Why are they more important than the rest of us who went to the meetings? Closing a lane on Stevens Creek Blvd. is a totally ridiculous idea. We studied it and have seen how Ludicrous it is. The total traffic demand on the road is already high. Dedicating one lane on Stevens Creek Blvd. to just buses would lead to total traffic chaos. Most people drive cars in The area and use this roadway for everyday and commute travel. The VTA buses of 23 and 523 Travel along in the slow and middle lane of Stevens Creek Blvd. and do a fine job of it now.

I am very pleased with how traffic flows on Stevens Creek Blvd. Bus 23 and 24 were fast Enough for me as a student to attend San Jose State. They did not even have the faster 523 bus Then. It might have helped me as a student etc., but I spent the whole day on the San Jose State campus anyway.

Please do not recommend that Stevens Creek Blvd. have one lane dedicated to bus only traffic.

This is playing into the hands of the authors of SB 79 to take over the control of millions Of acres of land adjacent to transit lines in California to be upzoned and upheighted without Any input from the public. This attempt by SB 79 has been described as the biggest "taking" Of land in California. That is why SB 79 is considered to be as dangerous as SB 50.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Jennifer Griffin
Cupertino Resident
From: Tracy K
To: City Council; City Clerk
Subject: Written Comment -- Please Involve the Planning Commission in Transportation Projects Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:49:59 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Council & City Clerk,
Please include the below in written communications for the 04/15/25 city council meeting for Agenda Item 13, which asks Council to vote on whether the SCB corridor vision study should go to the Bicycle Pedestrian versus Planning Commission.

Writing on behalf of myself -- Rather than placing a single project on the agenda for Council to assign, why not have an agenda item that allows Council to discuss and adopt a comprehensive framework for how all future transit-related projects should be routed to commissions? Without this, will Council need to vote on commission assignments for every individual transit project moving forward?
Last year, several City Councilmembers already asked to agendize the addition of transit to the Planning Commission scope, which technically would solve the question raised above. To more efficiently use Council time, I would ask that transit-related projects requiring commission input automatically go past the Planning Commission, rather than requiring Council time to deliberate and vote. Our Council and staff both have many important priorities to handle, and having a clear framework for routing projects to commissions would remove one administrative burden from the load.

The norm for many neighboring cities is to involve the Planning Commission in transportation decisions. In fact, both Los Altos and Palo Alto have a joint Planning & Transit Commission.

Our city’s General Plan (Mobility Element) states that transportation is part of our planning policy. That means the Planning Commission should have the opportunity to hear and discuss these matters in a public meeting before decisions are finalized.

I respectfully ask the City Council to:
- Reaffirm that transportation and mobility fall under the Planning Commission’s responsibilities
- Direct staff to bring all current and future transportation projects to the Planning Commission and/or City Council for public hearings
- Ensure no changes to streets, parking, or traffic proceed without review at a public Planning Commission or City Council hearing
Thank you,
Tracy
From: Venkat Ranganathan
To: City Clerk
Cc: City Council; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Re: Encourage Planning Commission Involvement in Transportation Decisions Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:39:33 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Clerk,
Please include the below in written communications for the 04/15/25 city council meeting for the SCB corridor vision study agenda item.

Thanks
Venkat
From: Venkat Ranganathan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:34 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Cupertino City Manager's Office <[email protected]> Subject: Encourage Planning Commission Involvement in Transportation Decisions

Dear Mayor Chao, Vice Mayor Moore, and Councilmembers
As a long time Cupertino resident, I’d like to share a brief suggestion regarding our city’s approach to transportation planning.

Projects that affect road design, signal timing, or parking often have wide-reaching impacts on mobility and quality of life. I believe that bringing these items to public hearings—particularly through the Planning Commission—can help strengthen transparency and community trust.

Several neighboring cities, including Sunnyvale, Los Altos, and Mountain View, already involve their Planning Commissions in similar decisions. Cupertino’s General Plan also recognizes that transportation and mobility are part of the city’s planning framework.

I request the Council to consider directing staff to bring current and future transportation projects to the Planning Commission and/or City Council for public review. This would help ensure thoughtful planning and give residents an opportunity to provide input in a constructive setting.

Thank you for your attention and for your continued service to our community.

Sincerely,
Venkatesan Ranganathan
Cupertino Resident
From: Venkat Ranganathan
To: City Council; City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject: Encourage Planning Commission Involvement in Transportation Decisions Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:34:45 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Chao, Vice Mayor Moore, and Councilmembers
As a long time Cupertino resident, I’d like to share a brief suggestion regarding our city’s approach to transportation planning.

Thank you for your attention and for your continued service to our community.

Sincerely,
Venkatesan Ranganathan
Cupertino Resident
From: Sophia Chan
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Great things Bike Pedestrian Commission has accomplished Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:11:22 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello City Council Members!
Hope you are having a great week.

It has been brought to my attention that there is discussion regarding the elimination of the BPC. Why is this even a consideration? Is this a budget issue? Have they accomplished nothing? Is Bike and Pedestrian safety no longer a concern?
It is disturbing in this climate where people believe they can just eliminate commission without thoughtful consideration. Cupertino has come a long way in creating a safe alternative travel environment (other than cars) for our community. Now we are going to punish the commission for doing a good job? Please make thoughtful decisions as we will be watching carefully around your decision making process. It’s important that safety always be the forefront and that having the BPC helps to keep people focused on this goal.

Thank you for your consideration.

Best Regards,
Sophia

Sent from my iPhone
From: Lisa Warren
To: Liang Chao; Kitty Moore; J.R. Fruen; Sheila Mohan; R "Ray" Wang; Floy Andrews; Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Clerk
Subject: Agenda Item Action Item #13 City Council Mtg April 15, 2025 Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 2:45:59 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Mayor and City Council Members,
I am requesting, and feel strongly that it is the responsible thing to do, that you direct staff to present the Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study to the Planning Commission to review and provide input. In addition, please have PC recommendations make their way to City Council for review.

Your public must have opportunity to easily participate in large decisions like this. This is not appropriate to be solely a Bike Ped Comm. agenda item . Ideas that have been floated over the years for SC Blvd have many, many impacts on many things public and private.

Surely there is an opportunity for Bike Ped commissioners to give input either in a joint PC/BPC study session, or Commissioners representing themselves in public PC meeting that is far easier for the public to participate in, and has meetings recorded for viewing.

In addition, please use this opportunity to confirm that transportation and mobility are best suited for the Planning Commission responsibilities.

Set things up so that no changes to streets, parking, or traffic proceed without review at a public Planning Commission or City Council meeting under the Public Hearing portion of the agenda.

Thank you,
Lisa Warren
Resident, Consumer, Driver, Bike rider, Walker
From: Michael Chen
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Keep the Planning Commission"s scope limited
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 2:44:27 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Cupertino City Council members,
Please keep the Planning Commission's scope limited to land use matters only.

I've been made aware that a topic for tonight's city council meeting will be asking the Planning Commission to weigh in on transportation matters over the Bike Ped Commission. This is an inappropriate and out-of-scope request as the Planning Commission is not tasked with weighing in on transportation matters.

Sincerely,
Michael Chen
Cupertino Resident
From: helen wiant
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Bike and Pedestrian Commission
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 2:09:18 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council,
I have learned that the council is planning to discuss whether to ask the Planning Commission to review and provide input on the Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study. I find this notion quite inappropriate. This Study is clearly a transportation issue and should be studied by the Bike and Pedestrian Commission.

Commissions exist so that people knowledgeable in the specific area can help the city manage that area through thoughtful consideration and data gathering. Over the years, our Bike and Pedestrian commission has initiated very significant improvements to our transportation infrastructure which have immeasurably enhanced safety, convenience and quality of life in our city. This takes time and expertise that belongs to the Bike and Pedestrian commission, not to the Planning Commission which manages land use and is not focused specifically on transportation. The Bike and Pedestrian commission should be the commission to review the Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study in order to deliver the best result for our city and community.

Thank you,
Helen Wiant
Resident since 1977
10354 Westacres Drive
Cupertino
From: Mahesh Gurikar
To: City Clerk
Subject: Fwd: Request to involve Planning Commission in Transportation projects Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 1:20:35 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Resend with corrected email id
Begin forwarded message:

From: Mahesh Gurikar <[email protected]>
Date: April 15, 2025 at 10:15:37 AM PDT
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Request to involve Planning Commission in Transportation projects
Dear City Clerk,
Please include the below in written communications for the 04/15/25 city council meeting for the SCB corridor vision study agenda item.

Subject: Please Involve the Planning Commission in Transportation Projects To:

Mayor Liang Chao
Vice Mayor Kitty Moore
Councilmember Ray Wang
Councilmember Sheila Mohan
Councilmember J.R. Fruen
CC:

City Manager Pamela Wu
Director of Public Works Chad Mosley
Director of Community Development Ben Fu
City Attorney
Dear Mayor Chao, Vice Mayor Moore, and Councilmembers,
We are Cupertino residents who care about how our city handles transportation. It is important that all major transportation decisions go through a public hearing— either at the Planning Commission, at the City Council, or both. This should include road design changes, traffic signal timing, intersection redesigns, parking removals, and lane reductions.

Many nearby cities already involve their Planning Commissions in transportation decisions.

Our neighboring cities understand that transportation planning affects everyone and deserves input from the public through open meetings.

Our city’s General Plan (Mobility Element) already states that transportation is part of our planning policy. That means the Planning Commission should have the opportunity to hear and discuss these matters in a public meeting before decisions are finalized.

I respectfully request the City Council to:

Reaffirm that transportation and mobility fall under the Planning Commission’s responsibilities
Direct staff to bring all current and future transportation projects to the Planning Commission and/or City Council for public hearings
Make sure no changes to streets, parking, or traffic proceed without review at a public Planning Commission or City Council hearing
Thank you for ensuring Cupertino residents have a voice in how our city’s transportation systems evolve.

Sincerely,
Mahesh and Shrividya Gurikar
Cupertino Resident
From: Peggy Griffin
To: Liang Chao; Kitty Moore; R "Ray" Wang; J.R. Fruen; Sheila Mohan Cc: City Clerk; Pamela Wu; Chad Mosley; Benjamin Fu
Subject: 2025-04-15 City Council Meeting - AGENDA ITEM 13 Stevens Creek Blvd Corridor Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 12:22:10 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

PLEASE INCLUDE THIS EMAIL AS PART OF WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE ABOVE MEETING AGENDA ITEM.

Dear Mayor Chao, Vice Mayor Moore and Councilmembers,

This Stevens Creek Blvd (SCB) Corridor Vision Study is a massive undertaking that, if implemented in Cupertino, will have drastic impacts on our roads, traffic, businesses along SCB in addition to bike and pedestrian changes. Also, Cupertino would lose control over decisions that impact our residents and requires significant financial and possibly staff resources. This MUST have significant review and public hearings!

As other people have pointed out, many of our neighboring cities currently send transportation decisions to their Planning Commissions. This includes Sunnyvale, Los Altos, Santa Clara, Mountain View and San Jose.

REQUESTS: Please

1. Reaffirm that transportation and mobility fall under the responsibilities of the Planning Commission.

2. Direct staff to bring all current and future transportation projects to the Planning Commission then to City Council. This should include road design changes, traffic signal timing, intersection redesigns, parking removals and lane reductions. This will allow current and future road changes to have a public hearing and adequate visibility to all involved.

3. Direct staff to present the Stevens Creek Blvd Corridor Vision Study to the Planning Commission for review and recommendations then send it to City Council.

4. When this SCB Corridor Vision Study goes to the Planning Commission please include more documents. Attachment A references these missing docs:
a. Appendix B – Preliminary analysis on alternatives (elevated, underground, I-280) b. If there is an Appendix B, there must be an Appendix A. c. Design and Transportation Manual (CDT) (can be a link?) d. VTA’s Speed and Reliability Program (link?)
e. City Council Staff report dated July 16, 2019 (on corridor website for Cupertino docs)
f. City Council Resolution No 18-089
g. Details for Cupertino for intersections/plans (study mentions specific items)

Transportation impacts more than just the users (vehicles, bikes, peds). It impacts businesses, quality of life, the experience of coming to Cupertino or avoiding it all together.

Please make sure these decisions are made at public hearings where public participation is maximized.

Sincerely,
Peggy Griffin

P.S. Note that the Bike/Ped Commission is held in a very small conference room in Quinlan with NO REMOTE public participation allowed, no overhead available.

From: louise saadati
To: City Council; City Clerk
Subject: Please Preserve the Walk Bike Commission
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 11:42:10 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Honourable City Council:

Please preserve the Walk Bike Commission. It is important that there is a dedicated commission to protect the vulnerable bikers and pedestrians in Cupertino who must share the road with the much bigger and faster cars, vans and trucks which weigh 2,500 to 5,000 cars and trucks. The Walk Bike Commission is essential in increasing the safety for walkers and bikers in Cupertino including Stevens Creek Boulevard.

The Planning Commission is busy enough with the land and business issues that it faces without having walk bike issues added.

Please protect the walkers and bikers in Cupertino by preserving the Walk Bike Commission with its unique and important mission.

Thank you,
Louise Saadati
38 year Cupertino senior resident, car driver and slow walker Sent from my iPhone
From: S B
To: City Council; City Clerk; City Attorney"s Office; Cupertino City Manager"s Office Subject: Agenda Item 13: Please involve the Planning Commission Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 11:38:09 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the Council and City Clerk,
Please include the following email as part of the written communications for Agenda Item 13 of the City Council meeting on April 15, 2025.

To the mayor, Vice Mayor and council members,
Most Cupertino residents work outside the city, and for various reasons—whether due to age, health, or distance—they choose to commute by car. Driving remains a practical and necessary mode of transportation for many, and this trend is not unique to Cupertino. While encouraging biking and walking is beneficial for both environmental and safety reasons, these goals must be balanced with the needs and lifestyles of Cupertino’s residents.

Advocacy groups certainly play an important role in raising awareness, but they should not have the authority to dictate how our community lives and commutes. Their influence should not be so overwhelming that it shapes transportation policy to the point of disregarding the broader needs of the population.

As of 2023, 35% of all registered vehicles in Santa Clara County were electric, and 43% of new car purchases that year were zero-emission vehicles. In Cupertino, this trend is clearly visible, with many cars on our streets being electric. Therefore, claiming that the primary need for more bike routes is environmental is not entirely accurate, especially when many residents are already driving electric vehicles.

When you look at the bike lanes during the day, they are often underused. Even during school commute hours, the bike lanes are far from full. This is reflected in the data that shows fewer than 20% of high school students commute by bike. There are several reasons for this—many students are new drivers excited to drive, others have busy schedules, or live too far to make biking practical. Given the relatively small percentage of students using bikes for commuting, mandating that a major thoroughfare like Stevens Creek Boulevard be made “bike-friendly” without thorough analysis and broader public input is not driven by safety concerns, as advocacy groups might suggest, but rather by a desire to assert influence. It is important to remember that Stevens Creek Boulevard is a major arterial road, and any changes to it should be carefully considered, with input from all segments of the community.

Cities like Sunnyvale, Los Altos, Santa Clara, Mountain View, and San José involve their Planning Commissions in transportation matters to ensure broader oversight and public engagement. These cities recognize the importance of public input in transportation decisions and ensure that proposals are reviewed by the appropriate commissions and bodies before decisions are made.

Given the significant impact that transportation planning has on all Cupertino residents, I strongly urge the Council to direct staff to bring the Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study before the Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission, the Planning Commission and City Council for a thorough public review. Stevens Creek Boulevard is a major thoroughfare that serves a diverse range of residents, and any proposed changes should be carefully considered and subject to input from all sectors of the community—not driven solely by advocacy groups.

In addition to reviewing the Stevens Creek Boulevard Vision study, I encourage the Council to simulataneously consider a review of changes made to De Anza Boulevard, another crucial arterial road. It is essential that all major transportation decisions undergo careful scrutiny to ensure they serve the needs of all residents and not just one group or perspective.

Furthermore, while there are grants available for transportation improvements, I propose that the Council explore using some of these funds to acquire environmentally friendly school buses for elementary and middle school students. This would reduce car traffic, improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists, and foster a sense of community among students traveling together.

Finally, I urge the Council to make it a mandate that all current and future transportation projects—whether related to bike lanes, traffic signals, or parking—be brought before the Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council for detailed analysis and public input.

Thank you for considering these important factors and for ensuring that all voices in Cupertino are heard as we shape the future of our transportation system.

Regards
Sashi
From: Ravi Kiran Singh Sapaharam
To: Chad Mosley; City Council; Pamela Wu; City Clerk; Benjamin Fu; City Attorney"s Office Subject: Request for Public Involvement in Transportation Projects Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 11:32:54 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor Liang Chao, Vice Mayor Kitty Moore, Councilmember J.R. Fruen, Councilmember Sheila Mohan, and Councilmember Ray Wang, I am writing as a resident of Cupertino to express my concern regarding the city’s transportation practices. I believe that all significant transportation decisions should be subject to public hearings, either at the Planning Commission, the City Council, or both.

This should encompass road design modifications, traffic signal adjustments, intersection redesigns, parking removals, and lane reductions.

Numerous neighboring cities have already incorporated their Planning Commissions into transportation decision-making processes. For instance, Sunnyvale’s Planning Commission was involved in the development of the Citywide Transportation System Plan on October 15, 2024, and the Caltrain Station Area Plan on September 10, 2024.

Los Altos - Planning and Transportation Commission
Community Traffic Safety and Parking - March 5, 2024
Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements - January 22, 2024
Santa Clara - Planning Commission
Traffic Calming Measures - October 2, 2024
Transportation Access for Mixed-Use Projects - November 6, 2024 Mountain View - Planning Commission
El Camino Real Mobility Plan - January 10, 2025
Hwy 101 Interchange Improvements - December 15, 2024
San Jose - Planning Commission
Safety Improvements at Race St and Parkmoor Ave - February 12, 2025 New Bike Lanes Project - March 18, 2025
These cities recognize that transportation planning impacts all citizens and requires public input through open meetings.

Our city’s General Plan (Mobility Element) explicitly states that transportation is an integral component of our planning policy. Consequently, the Planning Commission should have the opportunity to engage in discussions and provide feedback on these matters during public meetings prior to final decisions.

I respectfully request that the City Council:

Reiterate that transportation and mobility are within the Planning Commission’s jurisdiction.

Mandate staff to present all ongoing and future transportation projects to the Planning Commission and/or City Council for public hearings.

Ensure that any alterations to streets, parking, or traffic arrangements undergo review at a public Planning Commission or City Council hearing.

Thank you for ensuring that Cupertino residents have a voice in the evolution of our city’s transportation systems.

Sincerely,
Ravi Kiran Singh, Cupertino Resident
From: John G
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Council item 13, 4/15/25 - Utilize & Preserve Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 11:32:12 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Cupertino City Council,
Please utilize the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission for presentation, review and input for the Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study.

The planning commission is to be used for land use matters only and should not be used for this action. The planning commission does not deal with transportation topics and is inappropriate for dealing with this topic.

The Bicycle Pedestrian Commission is the appropriate commission to review and provide input on traffic matters.

Please preserve the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission as it has a vital function for transportation topics.

Thank you,
John Geis
Cupertino Resident
[email protected]
From: Jennifer Griffin
To: City Council; City Clerk
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Planning Commission Review of the Stevens Creek Corridor Transit Vision Study Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 10:55:47 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
(Please include the following as public comment on Item Number 13 for the Stevens Creek Blvd Corridor Transit Vision Study at the 4/15/25 City Council Meeting.) Dear City Council:

I think the Planning Commission should review the results of the Stevens Creek Corridor Transit Vision Study. The Planning Commission is the natural venue to provide the Discussion of the results of this study because they are resident-focused and represent A chance for everyone to have their views and comments known.

I attended the study sessions for the Stevens Creek Blvd meetings and I think everyone's Views need to be heard. The Bike and Ped Commission is not called the Bike and Ped And Car Committee. They do not advocate for or represent people who drive cars. They Are not the correct group to review this important study. There were many incidents in The course of the study were I feel the Bike advocates unfairly tried to dominate the Discussions in the study and the meetings. This was especially evident at the highly Irregular and out of control August, 2024 Stevens Creek Advisory Committee meeting in Cupertino where fifty bike advocates showed up and demanded that one lane be closed On Stevens Creek Blvd so that there would bus only or bus rapid transit on the road.

No one had talked about closing one lane on Stevens Creek Blvd. Very much or At all at the study meetings and these people showed up And tried to dominate and dictate what happened at the August, 2024 meeting. Many of these People were from out of town and never had been at any of the Corridor Study meetings. One person was from Campbell and demanded the lane be removed for cars and onlyHave buses. Why was someone from Campbell demanding this thing when they did notEven live in Cupertino, Santa Clara or San Jose? What were people from South San Francisco down in Cupertino demanding things on Stevens Creek Blvd? None of them had Even bothered to spend their time going to the study meetings? Why did they care about Stevens Creek Blvd? Who were they representing?
I don't think think the Bike and Ped Commission should be reviewing the Stevens Creek Blvd. Corridor Transit Vision Study. They don't represent people who drive cars And I think they have shown themselves to only be interested in bikes etc. I think they are unduly influenced by outside forces etc. They should only review bike plans etc., maybe.

But, the results of the Stevens Creek Blvd. Corridor Transit Vision Plan should be left In the hands of the Cupertino Planning Commission so everyone gets a fair say. We Need balanced input from all transportation modes involved, cars as well as bikes To make good, rational decisions based on the results of this multi-year study.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Jennifer Griffin
Car Driver and Driver of Family Members in Cars
From: Jennifer Griffin
To: City Council; City Clerk
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Planning Commission Review of the Stevens Creek Corridor Transit Vision Study Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 10:55:46 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
(Please include the following as public comment on Item Number 13 for the Stevens Creek Blvd Corridor Transit Vision Study at the 4/15/25 City Council Meeting.) Dear City Council:

Thank you.

Best regards,
Jennifer Griffin
Car Driver and Driver of Family Members in Cars
From: Carol Mattsson
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Bike safety policies and infrastructure
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 10:46:21 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please do NOT refer the Stevens Creek Corridor Study project to the Planning Commission for input. The right commission to provide input on this project is the Bike Ped Commission.

Please keep Cupertino supporting people who want to travel by bicycle and walking. Leave car travel for those who have no alternatives.

Thanks,
Carol Mattsson
Long time Cupertino resident who travels by bicycle as much as by car. --
Carol Mattsson
Web Developer
(408) 309-8314
[email protected]
www.surfpix.net/web
Web Solutions from Essential Bits, Inc.

From: Yvonne Strom
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Stop the Overreach of the Planning Commission
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 10:41:43 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Esteemed City Council,
I strongly oppose the idea for the Planning Commission to take control of Transportation issues in the Stevens Creek Boulevard Vision Plan. The Bike Ped Commission is very much better suited to evaluate the needs and the safety of all users on the Corridor.

Thank you,
Yvonne Thorstenson
a resident, a mom, a motorist, and a cyclist
From: Ram Sripathi
To: City Council; Pamela Wu; City Clerk; Chad Mosley; Benjamin Fu; City Attorney"s Office Subject: Please Involve the Planning Commission in Transportation Projects Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 10:41:41 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Clerk,
Please include the below in written communications for the 04/15/25 city council meeting for the SCB corridor vision study agenda item.

To:

Mayor Liang Chao
Vice Mayor Kitty Moore
Councilmember Ray Wang
Councilmember Sheila Mohan
Councilmember J.R. Fruen
CC:

City Manager Pamela Wu
Director of Public Works Chad Mosley
Director of Community Development Ben Fu
City Attorney
Dear Mayor Chao, Vice Mayor Moore, and Councilmembers,
I’m writing as a Cupertino resident who cares about how our city handles transportation. I believe it’s important that all major transportation decisions go through a public hearing—either at the Planning Commission, at the City Council, or both. This should include road design changes, traffic signal timing, intersection redesigns, parking removals, and lane reductions.

Many nearby cities already involve their Planning Commissions in transportation decisions. Here are just a few examples:

Sunnyvale – Planning Commission
Citywide Transportation System Plan – Oct 15, 2024
Caltrain Station Area Plan – Sep 10, 2024
Los Altos – Planning and Transportation Commission
Community Traffic Safety and Parking – Mar 5, 2024
Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements – Jan 22, 2024
Santa Clara – Planning Commission
Traffic Calming Measures – Oct 2, 2024
Transportation Access for Mixed-Use Projects – Nov 6, 2024 Mountain View – Planning Commission
El Camino Real Mobility Plan – Jan 10, 2025
Hwy 101 Interchange Improvements – Dec 15, 2024
San José – Planning Commission
Safety Improvements at Race St and Parkmoor Ave – Feb 12, 2025 New Bike Lanes Project – Mar 18, 2025
These cities understand that transportation planning affects everyone and deserves input from the public through open meetings.

I respectfully ask the City Council to:

Reaffirm that transportation and mobility fall under the Planning Commission’s responsibilities Direct staff to bring all current and future transportation projects to the Planning Commission and/or City Council for public hearings
Make sure no changes to streets, parking, or traffic proceed without review at a public Planning Commission or City Council hearing
Thank you for ensuring Cupertino residents have a voice in how our city’s transportation systems evolve.

Sincerely,
Ram Sripathi
Cupertino Resident
Sent from my iPhone
From: Daniel Ying
To: City Council; Pamela Wu; City Clerk; Chad Mosley; Benjamin Fu; City Attorney"s Office Subject: Please Involve the Planning Commission in Transportation Projects Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 10:32:23 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Clerk,
Please include the below in written communications for the 04/15/25 city council meeting for the SCB corridor vision study agenda item.

Subject: Please Involve the Planning Commission in Transportation Projects To:

Mayor Liang Chao
Vice Mayor Kitty Moore
Councilmember Ray Wang
Councilmember Sheila Mohan
Councilmember J.R. Fruen
CC:

City Manager Pamela Wu
Director of Public Works Chad Mosley
Director of Community Development Ben Fu
City Attorney
Dear Mayor Chao, Vice Mayor Moore, and Councilmembers,
I’m writing as a Cupertino resident who cares about how our city handles transportation. I believe it’s important that all major transportation decisions go through a public hearing— either at the Planning Commission, at the City Council, or both. This should include road design changes, traffic signal timing, intersection redesigns, parking removals, and lane reductions.

Many nearby cities already involve their Planning Commissions in transportation decisions.

Here are just a few examples:

I respectfully ask the City Council to:

Sincerely,
Daniel Ying
Cupertino Resident
From: Muru Sinnassamy
To: City Council; City Clerk; Chad Mosley; David Stillman; Pamela Wu; Kristina Alfaro Subject: Please Involve the Planning Commission in Transportation Projects Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 10:21:58 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To:

Mayor Liang Chao
Vice Mayor Kitty Moore
Councilmember Ray Wang
Councilmember Sheila Mohan
Councilmember J.R. Fruen
CC:

City Manager Pamela Wu
Director of Public Works Chad Mosley
Director of Community Development Ben Fu
City Attorney
Dear Mayor Chao, Vice Mayor Moore, and Councilmembers,
I’m writing as a Cupertino resident who cares about how our city handles transportation. I believe it’s important that all major transportation decisions go through a public hearing— either at the Planning Commission, at the City Council, or both. This should include road design changes, traffic signal timing, intersection redesigns, parking removals, and lane reductions.

Many nearby cities already involve their Planning Commissions in transportation decisions.

Here are just a few examples:

I respectfully ask the City Council to:

Reaffirm that transportation and mobility fall under the Planning Commission’s responsibilities
Direct staff to bring all current and future transportation projects to the Planning Commission and/or City Council for public hearings. Make sure no changes to streets, parking, or traffic proceed without review at a public Planning Commission or City Council hearing Thank you for ensuring Cupertino residents have a voice in how our city’s transportation systems evolve.

Sincerely,
Muru Sinnassamy
Cupertino Resident
From: Santosh Rao
To: City Council; Cupertino City Manager"s Office; City Attorney"s Office; Chad Mosley; Benjamin Fu; City Clerk Subject: Please Reaffirm Planning Commission’s Role in Transportation Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 8:58:59 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Clerk,
Would you please include the below in written communications for the council agenda item on Steven’s Creek Corridor vision study.
[Writing on behalf of myself only, as a Cupertino resident.] Subject: Please Reaffirm Planning Commission’s Role in Transportation To:

Mayor Liang Chao
Cupertino city council members
CC:

City Manager Pamela Wu
Director of Public Works Chad Mosley
Director of Community Development Ben Fu
City Attorney Floy Andrews
Dear Mayor Chao, Vice Mayor Moore, and Councilmembers,
I am writing to respectfully urge you to reaffirm the role of the Cupertino Planning Commission in reviewing and shaping transportation and mobility projects, as outlined in the Mobility Element of our General Plan.

Across the Bay Area, cities consistently treat transportation as an essential part of their planning commissions’ charter. Below are specific examples of how neighboring cities integrate transportation into their Planning Commission’s work:

Palo Alto – Planning & Transportation Commission
Grade Separation Safety Improvements – Dec 18, 2024
El Camino Real Corridor Plan – Aug 14, 2024
Sunnyvale – Planning Commission
Citywide Transportation System Plan Update – Oct 15, 2024 Caltrain Station Area Plan – Sep 10, 2024
Los Altos – Planning and Transportation Commission
Community Traffic Safety and Parking – Mar 5, 2024
Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Improvements – Jan 22, 2024 Santa Clara – Planning Commission
Mission Point Mixed-Use Project (transportation access reviewed) – Nov 6, 2024 Traffic Calming and Safety Measures – Oct 2, 2024
San José – Planning Commission
Race Street and Parkmoor Avenue Safety Improvements – Feb 12, 2025 Bicycle Lane Installation Project – Mar 18, 2025
Hayward – Planning Commission
Adaptive Signal Timing Project – Mar 10, 2024
Downtown Area Transportation Plan – Apr 5, 2024
Mountain View – Planning Commission
El Camino Real Mobility Improvements – Jan 10, 2025
Highway 101 Interchange Enhancement Project – Dec 15, 2024 Menlo Park – Planning Commission
Willow Road Corridor Improvements – Feb 8, 2025
Downtown Mobility and Parking Study – Jan 30, 2025
Fremont – Planning Commission
BART to Warm Springs Extension Project – Nov 20, 2024
Roadway Capacity and Traffic Improvements – Dec 5, 2024 Milpitas – Planning Commission
Montague Expressway Corridor Improvements – Jan 3, 2025 Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Plan – Feb 14, 2025 Redwood City – Planning Commission
Woodside Road Traffic Calming – Oct 21, 2024
Sequoia Station Transit Oriented Development – Nov 7, 2024 These examples show how transportation projects are reviewed through a planning lens, with public input and alignment with each city’s long-term vision.

Cupertino’s Mobility Element of the General Plan already makes clear that transportation is part of land use planning and therefore falls under the Planning Commission’s existing charter.

Yet I have observed that recent changes—such as intersection signal timing adjustments, roadway configuration changes, lane and parking removals—have not been presented to either the Planning Commission or the City Council. These decisions are occurring without proper public review and engagement.

I respectfully urge Council to:

1. Reaffirm that transportation and mobility fall within the Planning Commission’s purview

2. Direct staff to bring all current and future transportation projects—including traffic signal timing changes, intersection redesigns, lane removals, parking removals, and parking ordinances—to the Planning Commission for hearing and recommendation

3. Ensure that no transportation or roadway change proceeds without a public hearing at either the Planning Commission or the City Council—or ideally both The Planning Commission is a quasi-judicial body designed to ensure community engagement and informed deliberation. Its hybrid format also increases accessibility for residents wishing to participate.

Transportation directly impacts the safety, accessibility, and quality of life of every Cupertino resident. I urge you to act now to ensure that all transportation decisions are reviewed transparently and with public input.

Sincerely,
San Rao (writing on behalf of myself only, as a Cupertino resident) From: [email protected]
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Stevens Creek Corridor Study
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 6:12:11 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To members of the City Council
I note on your agenda for this evening your item 2513867 " Direct staff to present the Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study to either the Planning Commission or the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission for review and input.”
I am of the firm opinion that this item clearly falls under the purview of the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission and should be referred there. The Planning Commission should focus on its main job which is land use. Adding this project to its agenda would be inappropriate.

Tom Scannell
Cupertino Resident since 1980
From: Stephanie Miller
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Agenda Item 13
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 12:03:48 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council Members,
It has been brought to my attention that the council is discussing whether to direct the Planning Commission to review and provide input on the Stevens Creek Corridor Study instead of the more appropriate Bike Ped Commission.

It is my opinion that it is entirely inappropriate to refer the project to the Planning Commission for input. The Planning Commission's purview is land use matters ONLY. The Bike Ped Commission oversees transportation topics and is the right commission to provide input on this project.

It is not clear to me why this shift would even be considered. Shouldn't the commission that specializes in transportation issues like biking and walking (two healthy alternatives to cars that can be used to transport oneself) be the entity to which our council seeks advice as this is their area of expertise? Would you ask a general internist to perform your open heart surgery or would you want the cardiothoracic surgeon who has been trained and has expertise in this matter to be the one to operate?
I urge the council to continue to allow the Bike Ped Commission to hold ownership of transportation issues affecting the citizens of Cupertino.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,
Stephanie Miller
From: Betsy Megas
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: 4/15/25 Council agenda item 13: Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 11:34:34 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the Cupertino City Council:

The Stevens Creek Vision Plan focuses on transportation. It is also substantially complete, the product of two years of intense community participation.

Please keep the responsibility for the Vision with your Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission, which is composed of citizen experts on transportation. If the Planning Commission would like to see it, by all means, make it an information item, but please do not shift the responsibility to a commission concerned primarily with land use.

I hope you will also, ultimately, approve the Vision and continue to build toward the full potential it calls for, including continuous protected bike lanes and dedicated bus lanes. With the protected bike lanes there today, Cupertino has set the standard for the rest of the local cities and agencies, and I look forward to all of the participants continuing to improve Stevens Creek Boulevard into the vibrant, safe, convenient, continuous, and multimodal corridor the community calls for in our Vision.

Many thanks,
Betsy Megas
Resident, City of Santa Clara. I bike nearly everywhere, including on Stevens Creek in Cupertino.

Member, City of Santa Clara Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Member, VTA Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Speaking only for myself
From: Greg Siano
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: April 15 City Council Meeting - Agenda Item 13 Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 10:28:11 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Council,
I am writing to express my disappointment at the fact that you will be discussing whether or not to allow the Planning Commission to provide input on the Stevens Creek Corridor Study.

This is a dangerous precedent to set, as it means the Planning Commission could exercise control over any city commission project. This is not the purpose of the Planning Commission, and using this as a means to not have to consider cyclist safety is frankly appalling.

Please remember that bicycling is not a fringe issue or a nuisance. For many people in our city, especially children and teens who are not old enough to drive, biking is their only means of independent transportation. Dismissing or minimizing bike and pedestrian safety means turning our backs on some of the most vulnerable members of our community.

Best,
Greg Siano
From: kellee Noonan
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; [email protected]
Subject: City Council meeting April 15, 2025 - Agenda Item 13 Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 10:06:38 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council members,
Please accept my input that the Stevens Creek Corridor Study input should be given to the Bike & Pedestrian Commission, not the Planning commission.

Input about transportation in the Valley should include input about public transit, pedestrian, & bicyclist safety which is the concern of the Bike & Pedestrian Commission, not the Planning Commission which is concerned with land use.

Thank you for your time,
Kellee Noonan
10290 Farallone Drive
Cupertino, CA
Sent from my iPad
From: Ian M
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Stevens Creek Corridor and Bike Ped Commission Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 9:43:34 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello,
I'm writing because I'm hearing worrying news that the Stevens Creek Corridor Project may be taken from the Bike Ped Commission. I'm fully against this. The Bike Ped Commission handles transportation and should be the ones dealing with the Stevens Creek Corridor Project.

The Planning Commission shouldn't be the ones sending the input on this. Doing so would be completely inappropriate. Bike safety is a hugely important matter for me and I don't want to see it dismissed. I love the McClellan and Stevens Creek bike lanes, and the new buffers on De Anza. Please, continue that good work. Thank you.
- Ian Morris
From: Pete Klein
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Agenda Item #13 of the 4/15 City Council Meeting Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 8:36:53 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

It's entirely inappropriate to refer the cycling and pedestrian projects to the Planning Commission for input. The Planning Commission's purview is land use matters ONLY.

The Bike Ped Commission oversees transportation topics and is the right commission to provide input on this project.

This is a clear attempt to subvert the progress and momentum achieved by the Bike Ped Commission over the past decade by the anti-safe streets group in our city government.

Peter Klein
Cupertino resident for 35 years
From: Winnifred Homer-Smith
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Should the Planning Commission be key to Stevens Creek Corridor study? Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 7:43:16 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

As a Cupertino resident who greatly values the city's movement towards a safer and more welcoming place for pedestrians and bicycles, I am confused by the possible involvement of the Planning Commission on this study. It seems to be something well within the scope of the very important Bike Ped Commission.

I have lived in the Bay Area all my 73 years, and the steady improvement in walking and bicycling safety and increased routes has made an amazing difference in my life. as it has in the lives of many friends. I am writing to advocate strongly for everything the city can do to improve these elements in it. It's hard to see how involving the Planning Commission, whose work is about land use, should intervene in something that definitely requires the knowledge and interest of the Bike Ped Commission. Please leave this project where it so clearly belongs.

Sincerely,
Winnifred Homer-Smith
23300 Via Esplendor
V58
Cupertino
From: Roy Scheuer
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Agenda Item 13 for April 15 mtg
Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 5:50:09 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I have been a resident of Cupertino for 35 years.

I support directing the Planning commission to review and provide input on the Stevens Creek Corridor study and other Transportation issues.

I would also support eliminating the Bike Ped Commission entirely.

Sincerely,
Roy Scheuerlein
From: Kristina Pistone
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Cupertino City Manager"s Office
Subject: Stevens Creek Corridor Study and Cyclist/Pedestrian Infrastructure Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 5:15:04 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Council,
I am writing to urge you to *not* refer the Stevens Creek Corridor Study to the Planning Commission for input. While I am a resident of Sunnyvale, I frequently travel between here and San Jose, as many people do, and will choose public transit or cycling where it is safe and feasible.

Adequate infrastructure to ensure cyclist and pedestrian safety is lacking through this whole region, particularly on larger streets such as Stevens Creek, and therefore this study is squarely in the purview of the BPAC.

For evidence that cars are dangerous (even to those in other cars) and we urgently need to prioritize more and safer alternatives, you can look no further than the recent CalMatters article out yesterday about fatally dangerous drivers: https://calmatters.org/investigation/2025/04/license- to-kill/
Thank you for your time,
Kristina Pistone, PhD
she/her/hers
From: Joel Wolf
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk; Pamela Wu
Subject: Item 13--Stevens Creek Boulevard Vision Study
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 4:48:41 PM
Attachments: image.png
image.png
Dear Mayor, Vice-Mayor and Councilmembers
I am writing in regard to Item 13 on the April 15 agenda, Direct Staff On Commission Review of the Stevens Creek Boulevard Corridor Vision Study (Study). The staff report concludes that “Either the Planning Commission or (emphasis added) the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission would be reasonable choices for review of the Study. As such, the City Council may decide which commission is the appropriate next entity to review and provide input to the City Council on this matter.”
I respectfully disagree with this opinion. The clear and correct choice for review of this Study is the Bicycle Pedestrian Committee (BPC) based on their Powers and Functions as listed in the Cupertino Municipal Code as follows:

The words “bicycle”, “pedestrian” and “transportation” make their appearance multiple times in the BPC Powers and Functions. The Study is clearly directed at the transportation infrastructure along a 9-mile stretch of Stevens Creek Boulevard which includes Cupertino. One of the Study goals as stated in the Vision statement is to provide a “A stress-free and enjoyable walking and bicycling environment. High-quality pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure would be prioritized to connect neighborhoods to the corridor within ½ mile or 20-minute walk of transit stops.” In addition, one of the Values and Guiding Principles of the Study is the Safety of All Corridor Users including eliminating transportation- related fatalities and severe injuries and to allow safe passage for vulnerable road users along and crossing the corridor.” I remind the council that the BPC put considerable effort and input into the Cupertino Vision Zero study recently approved by Council. The BPC will also be putting in considerable effort in the new Active Transportation Plan.

The staff report bases their opinion that the Planning Commission is an appropriate entity to review this Study on Section 2.32.070.G of the Municipal Code, which is to “Perform other functions as the City Council provides including conducting studies and preparing plans other than those required or authorized by state law.” In my opinion this is an overly broad interpretation of the Planning Commission powers. All the Powers and Functions of the Planning Commission are listed below. No where are the words “pedestrian”, “bicycle” or “transportation” mentioned. I would also add that a similar power is listed in the BPC Powers and Function in 2.92.080B6 which states “Any other activity that may be deemed appropriate and necessary.” I ask the Council the following question, Would they be comfortable having the BPC undertaking land use and zoning decisions? I certainly would not.

Thank you for your consideration on this matter
Joel Wolf

Joel Wolf

Vice Chair, Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission
[email protected]

From: Deepa Mahendraker
To: City Council; Pamela Wu; City Clerk; Chad Mosley; Benjamin Fu; City Attorney"s Office Subject: Please Involve the Planning Commission in Transportation Projects Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 4:32:10 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Clerk,
Please include the below in written communications for the 04/15/25 city council meeting for the SCB corridor vision study agenda item.

Subject: Please Involve the Planning Commission in Transportation Projects To:

Mayor Liang Chao
Vice Mayor Kitty Moore
Councilmember Ray Wang
Councilmember Sheila Mohan
Councilmember J.R. Fruen
CC:

Many nearby cities already involve their Planning Commissions in transportation decisions. Here are just a few examples:

I respectfully ask the City Council to:

Reaffirm that transportation and mobility fall under the Planning Commission’s responsibilities Direct staff to bring all current and future transportation projects to the Planning Commission and/or City Council for public hearings
Make sure no changes to streets, parking, or traffic proceed without review at a public Planning Commission or City Council hearing
Thank you for ensuring Cupertino residents have a voice in how our city’s transportation systems evolve.

Sincerely,
Deepa Mahendraker
Cupertino Resident
Sent from my iPhone

CC 04-15-2025
Item No. 14
Review future agenda
items requested by City
Councilmembers
Written Communications
From: Liang Chao
To: City Clerk
Subject: Fw: Agenda Item Request: Minor Modification to Muni Code for Parking Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 11:15:30 AM
Please add this to the written communication for Item 14 TBD list to provide context of the agenda request.

Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192
From: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2025 10:34 PM
To: Floy Andrews <[email protected]>; Pamela Wu <[email protected]>; Valenzuela, Neil <[email protected]>
Cc: Tina Kapoor <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Kitty Moore <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Agenda Item Request: Minor Modification to Muni Code for Parking

Adding Vice Mayor, with whom I have discussed some of this.

I looked into the Muni Code for 72-hour parking restriction in Saratoga and Los Altos, who are also under the same Sheriff's Office:

Los Altos's version: "For the purposes of this section, a vehicle or trailer shall be considered to have been parked or left standing for seventy-two (72) or more consecutive hours if it has not been moved at least one thousand (1,000) feet during such seventy-two (72) hour period."
Saratoga's version: "A vehicle shall be considered to have been parked or left standing for seventy-two or more consecutive hours if it has remained inoperable or has not been moved and remained at least one mile from its original parked location for at least twenty-four hours during the seventy-two-hour period." I found Fremont's version is similar to Mountain View's version:

Fremont's version: "any vehicle that has been parked in the same location for 72 hours move at least 1,000 feet from its current location and may not return to the same parking spot for at least 24 hours" (adopted Nov. 2024) Fremont on restriction near residential streets: "Additionally, oversized vehicles, including any attached trailers, vehicles, or loads which exceed 22 feet in length, and/or 6 feet in width and 7 feet in height, are no longer allowed to park on any public street within 100 feet of a residential property line. The ordinance allows for limited exemptions of loading/unloading, emergency vehicles and commercial deliveries. If the oversized vehicle is not moved within 24 hours after receiving a warning notice, the vehicle could receive a citation and will be at risk for getting towed. "
(adopted Nov. 2024)
I realize that restrictions on oversized vehicles are more complicated since we need to consider exemptions to allow construction vehicles etc and we need to define over- sized vehicles. So, in the first version, I would just consider the minor modification on parking violation, which would not require a study session.

For restrictions on oversized vehicles, we would likely need a study session first to get public and council input, which could be considered as a part of the FY 2025-27 Work Program.
===========
Los Altos Muni Code
https://library.municode.com/ca/los_altos/codes/code_of_ordinances? nodeId=TIT8VETR_CH8.20STSTPA

8.20.090 - Parking for more than 72 hours.

No person who owns or has possession, custody, or control of any vehicle or trailer shall park such vehicle or trailer upon any street, alley, or public place continuously for more than a consecutive period of seventy-two (72) hours. For the purposes of this section, a vehicle or trailer shall be considered to have been parked or left standing for seventy-two (72) or more consecutive hours if it has not been moved at least one thousand (1,000) feet during such seventy-two (72) hour period.
(Prior code § 3-2.913)

8.20.100 - Removal of vehicles parked more than 72 hours.

Any regularly employed and salaried officer of the police department may remove, or cause to be removed, any vehicle which has been parked or left standing upon a street, highway, or public parking lot for seventy-two (72) or more consecutive hours. (Prior code § 3-2.914)
Saratoga Muni Code
https://library.municode.com/ca/saratoga/codes/code_of_ordinances? nodeId=CH9MOVETR_ART9-25PAREAPALHI
9-25.030 - Parking of certain oversize vehicles on residential streets. (a) No person who owns or has possession, custody or control of any commercial vehicle recreational vehicle, boat or trailer, shall park or leave standing such vehicle upon any street in a residential district or abutting any property or area within a residential district for a period of seventy-two consecutive hours or more. A vehicle shall be considered to have been parked or left standing for seventy-two or more consecutive hours if it has remained inoperable or has not been moved and remained at least one mile from its original parked location for at least twenty-four hours during the seventy-two-hour period.
(b) Unattached boats and trailers shall not park or stand upon any public street. (c) For the purposes of this section:
(1) Trailer means a vehicle, other than a motor vehicle, designed for industrial, professional, or commercial purposes, for carrying property on its own structure, and for being drawn by a motor vehicle.
(2) Commercial vehicle shall have the meaning set forth in section 9-10.040; (3) Recreational vehicle means any vehicle used for recreation and designed for human habitation for recreational, emergency, or other occupancy, and not including passenger vehicles.
(Ord. No. 394, § 1(Att. A), 12-7-2022)
9-25.040 - Application of other laws.

The provisions of this Article are in addition to other parking regulations which are or may be imposed by the laws of the State and the provisions of this Code and shall not relieve any person from the duty to observe other and more restrictive provisions of the Vehicle Code or this Code.
9-25.050 - Enforcement of Article.

It shall be the duty of all policemen and Community Service Officers appointed for such purpose and all deputies of the County Sheriff performing police services in the City to enforce the regulations set forth in this Article.

Liang Chao

Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192
From: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2025 1:37 PM
To: Floy Andrews <[email protected]>; Pamela Wu <[email protected]>; Valenzuela, Neil <[email protected]>
Cc: Tina Kapoor <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Agenda Item Request: Minor Modification to Muni Code for Parking

Adding Captain Neil.

Captain,
What do you think about a potential change in parking regulation to require a vehicle to move by 1000 feet after 72 hours? And not return to the same spot within. 24 hours.

This mirrors the regulation in Mountain View.

In terms of implementation, I suppose that this would be complaints based like other Muni code enforcement. So, there is no need to track every parked vehicle. Only a few ones where a complaint is submitted for violating this code.

Thank you.

Liang
Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192
From: Floy Andrews <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2025 1:26 PM
To: Liang Chao <[email protected]>; Pamela Wu <[email protected]> Cc: Tina Kapoor <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Agenda Item Request: Minor Modification to Muni Code for Parking

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Thank you for this information, Mayor. I appreciate the research!

From a legal perspective, I believe an updated like this could be implemented in short order.

Curious whether we would need to loop in the County Sheriff’s department? I assume the County Sheriff is the entity that enforces the parking ordinance. I think we should take a quick look at whatever MOU or other agreement the City has with the County.

I would be inclined to mirror Mountain View’s version. I like its simplicity.

Best,
Floy

From: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 7:34 PM
To: Pamela Wu <[email protected]>; Floy Andrews <[email protected]> Cc: Tina Kapoor <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Agenda Item Request: Minor Modification to Muni Code for Parking

*** EXTERNAL SENDER ***
I learned that the cities around us have revised their Muni Code to address the issue of RV parking and we are lacking behind.

I would like to propose a minor modification to the Muni Code for parking to address the issue that a vehicle could occupy the same section of a public street 24x7 as long as they move the vehicle by 6 inches. This is against the original intent of the Muni Code

11.24.130.

I have included relevant Muni Code sections from Mountain VIew and Sunnyvale, in addition to Cupertino's Muni Code below.

We could consider the two options:

Mountain View's version: Any vehicle must be moved at least one thousand (1000) feet (approximately two-tenths (2/10) of a mile) from its current location and may not return to the same parking spot for at least twenty-four (24) hours after its departure.

Sunnyvale's version: Pushing or moving a vehicle a short distance will not be considered compliance with this section. Additionally, successive acts of parking shall be presumed to be a single act of parking within the meaning of this section when the vehicle is moved merely for the purpose of avoiding the parking limitations prescribed by this section.

I hope that such minor modification could be considered in a timely manner.

Thank you.

Liang

============
Current Cupertino Muni Code

11.24.130 Prohibited for More than Seventy-Two Hours.

No person who owns or has in his possession, custody, or control any vehicle or trailer shall park such vehicle or trailer upon any public street or alley for more than a consecutive period of seventy-two hours.
(Ord. 843, § 6, 1977)

Mountain View Muni Code:

SEC. 19.72. - Seventy-Two (72) hour parking limit—Twenty-Four (24) hour no return. - Any vehicle that has been parked or left standing in the same location or parking spot for seventy-two (72) consecutive hours must be moved at least one thousand (1000) feet (approximately two-tenths (2/10) of a mile) from its current location and may not return to the same parking spot for at least twenty-four (24) hours after its departure.

Sunnyvale Muni Code
§ 10.16.120
Use of streets or public parking facilities for storage of vehicles prohibited.

It is unlawful for any person who owns or has possession, custody or control of any vehicle, including a boat or trailer, to park or leave such vehicle upon any street, alley, or public parking facility for a period of seventy-two consecutive hours or more. The intent of this section is to limit parking of vehicles, boats and trailers to seventy-two consecutive hours. A vehicle or trailer shall be considered to have been parked or left standing for seventy-two or more consecutive hours if it has remained inoperable or has not been moved. An inoperable vehicle is a vehicle that cannot be moved under its own power or a vehicle which cannot operate legally and safely on the highways of the state.

Pushing or moving a vehicle a short distance or attempting to rub away the tire marking will not be considered compliance with this section. Additionally, successive acts of parking shall be presumed to be a single act of parking within the meaning of this section when the vehicle is moved merely for the purpose of avoiding the parking limitations prescribed by this section.
(Ord. 2435-93 § 1; Ord. 2633-00 § 1; Ord. 2925-10 § 1)

Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192
From: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 8:05 PM
To: Pamela Wu <[email protected]>; Tom Chin <[email protected]> Cc: Tina Kapoor <[email protected]>; Serena Tu <[email protected]> Subject: Re: RV parking resources

Yes. Please direct me to county resources.

Below is a question on city code enforcement:

"California Vehicle Code (CVC) 22651(k) and Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC) 11.24.130 state that vehicles cannot be parked in the same spot on a public street for more than 72 hours. " But they can move by 6 inches every day and still park in generally the same space? Or they have to move by at least the length of the vehicle so that the same "space" is not occupied by the same vehicle?"

Thanks. Appreciate your attention on this issue of high interest from the community .

Liang

Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192

From: Pamela Wu <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 5:58 PM
To: Liang Chao <[email protected]>; Tom Chin <[email protected]> Cc: Tina Kapoor <[email protected]>; Serena Tu <[email protected]> Subject: RE: RV parking resources

Mayor Chao, we can assist in directing your questions to the County planning office.

Please advice,

Pamela

Pamela Wu
City Manager
City Manager's Office
[email protected]
(408)777-1322

From: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 10:04 AM
To: Tom Chin <[email protected]>
Cc: Pamela Wu <[email protected]>; Tina Kapoor <[email protected]>; Serena Tu <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: RV parking resources

Where are legal RV parking places within Santa Clara County? Other RV parking resources?
Has the Santa Clara County adopted any RV ordinance? Or surrounding cities, like Sunnyvale? (in case the information is readily available to staff)

If we do not wish RVs to occupy our streets, I hope to know where they can park legally with and without RV facilities.

"California Vehicle Code (CVC) 22651(k) and Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC) 11.24.130 state that vehicles cannot be parked in the same spot on a public street for more than 72 hours. "
But they can move by 6 inches every day and still park in generally the same space? Or they have to move by at least the length of the vehicle so that the same "space" is not occupied by the same vehicle?

Thanks for the information,

Liang

Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192
From: Tom Chin <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2025 8:52 AM
To: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Cc: Pamela Wu <[email protected]>; Tina Kapoor <[email protected]>; Serena Tu <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: RV parking resources

Good morning Mayor Chao,

I have provided answers to your questions regarding RVs below:

Mary Avenue is not specifically designated for RV Parking.

The Rotating Safe Car Park (RSCP) program cannot accommodate RVs at this time. The RSCP provides parking spaces for passenger vehicles on private property. The risk of an RV breaking down or discharging grey or black water is very high. The private property owners are not likely to accept the risk.

California Vehicle Code (CVC) 22651(k) and Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC)

11.24.130 state that vehicles cannot be parked in the same spot on a public street for more than 72 hours. CVC 22651 (k) and CMC 11.24.130 aim to prevent abandoned vehicles from being stored on the street. Neither the CVC nor the CMC specifically prevents RVs from parking on public streets, and unless posted otherwise, all legally parked vehicles can be on public streets. Neither the CVC nor the CMC specify the distance a vehicle must travel to have been considered "moved." While mostly complaint-based, Code Enforcement regularly patrols areas of the city known to have RVs parked to enforce the 72-hour and street sweeping rules. Of all the parking citations issued by Code Enforcement, violations for CVC 22651 (k) and street sweeping are the most common. In FY 24, approximately 280 citations or warnings were issued.

Please let me know if you have additional questions.

Thank you,
Tom

Tom Chin
Emergency Manager
City Manager's Office
TomC@cupertino.
gov
(408) 777-1310

From: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2025 11:10 AM
To: Pamela Wu <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Chin <[email protected]>
Subject: RV parking resources

Given the high interest in RV Parking issue right now, I hope to understand what resources there are for RV parking in Cupertino and surrounding areas or the County.

I heard that Mary Ave is a designated RV parking site?
Does the rotating Safe Parking program accommodate RVs?

I think it's important to reasonably accommodate RV parking to support RV dwellers.

But they do not have the right to occupy the public street 24-7 as their own private parking space.

Thus, I’d like to know what’s the practice in terms of issuing fines when muni codes for street parking or street cleaning are violated.

Thanks,

Liang
Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192

From: Liang Chao
To: City Clerk
Subject: Fw: Upcoming Council study session on student housing and some questions on the decision to purchase Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 11:05:10 AM
Please add this to the written communication for Item 14 TBD list to provide context for Item 12 "Study session on multi-family apartments converting to student housing" Here is the motion from the draft Minutes of the April 2 Council meeting:

MOTION: Chao moved and Moore seconded to add the following item to a future agenda: A study session on the multifamily apartment conversion to student housing issue, and whether the City can do it; include existing proposed bills on student housing and comparisons to municipal codes on student housing in other jurisdictions, such as San Francisco and Berkeley; and consider a potential ordinance for student housing, so the City has control of its use and impact. The motion passed with the following vote: Ayes: Chao, Moore, Fruen, Mohan, and Wang. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192
From: Lee Lambert <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 2:32 PM
To: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Cc: Carla Maitland <[email protected]>; Omar Torres <[email protected]>; Kristina Whalen <[email protected]>; Peter Landsberger <[email protected]>; Pearl Cheng <[email protected]>; Laura Casas <[email protected]>; Terry Godfrey <[email protected]>; Alexander Gvatua <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Upcoming Council study session on student housing and some questions on the decision to purchase

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Thank you, Mayor Chao.

The Foothill-De Anza Community College District appreciates the opportunity to participate in the study session and will await the meeting date.

Sincerely,
Lee
Lee D. Lambert
Chancellor and CEO
Foothill-De Anza Community College District
12345 El Monte Road
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022-4599
650.949.6100
650.941.1638 (fax)
Executive Assistant: Carla Maitland
[email protected]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.

From: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 10:05 AM
To: Lee Lambert <[email protected]>; Omar Torres <[email protected]>; Kristina Whalen <[email protected]>; Carla Maitland <[email protected]>; Pearl Cheng <[email protected]>; Laura Casas <[email protected]>; Terry Godfrey <[email protected]>; Alexander Gvatua <[email protected]>; Peter Landsberger <[email protected]>
Subject: Fw: Upcoming Council study session on student housing and some questions on the decision to purchase

(Resending to add President Walen)
Dear Chancellor Lambert, President Torres, President Whalen and FHDA Community College Board Members,
I hope to keep you informed of the Council's decision to agendize a study session on the conversion of multifamily housing to student housing and its impact to Cupertino.

More details is in the enclosed email sent to some FHDA staff members who have reached out to set up a meeting with the City of Cupertino.

I realized later that this email should have been addressed to you directly as the leaders of the Foothill-De Anza Community Colleges.

Warmly,
Liang
Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192
From: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 9:37 AM
To: Serena Tu <[email protected]>; Carla Maitland <[email protected]>; Nathaly Aguilar <[email protected]>
Cc: Marisa Spatafore <[email protected]>; Ellen Kamei <[email protected]>; Pamela Wu <[email protected]>; Kitty Moore <[email protected]>; Floy Andrews <[email protected]>; Christopher Dela Rosa <[email protected]> Subject: Upcoming Council study session on student housing and some questions on the decision to purchase

(Fixed typo for FHDA and changed the subject line. Added Vice Chancellor Christopher Dela Rosa)
Dear FHDA Friends,
Last night (April 2), the City Council unanimously voted to schedule a study session on the potential impacts of converting multifamily housing—such as McClellan Terrace— into student housing. We will be examining the effects on the City’s affordable housing stock in comparable price ranges, as well as parking and public safety concerns associated with changing the use from 94 family units to housing for 332 unrelated young adults.

For me, the decision to agendize the study session is out of the great concern of the loss of affordable housing stock in the price range as McClellan Terrace. As indicated by the research done in the attached email by Rhoda Fry,
Terrace rents are more affordable than others in the area.

Terrace is the only large complex that is in the Monta Vista tri-school area.

As mentioned by a member of the public at the April 2 City Council meeting, this is a housing justice issue: converting McClellan Terrace to student housing would deprive 94 families of access to high-performing schools like Lincoln Elementary, Kennedy Middle, and Monta Vista High. There are no other nearby units in a similar price range, which runs counter to the goal of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing included in the Housing Element we recently adopted.

I would like to understand more about the Foothill-De Anza College Board’s decision- making process in choosing to purchase an older apartment complex rather than constructing on-campus student dormitories. If available, it would be extremely helpful if you could share any comparative studies or cost analyses your team has conducted.

Some questions that come to mind include:

1. Has FHDA considered building on-campus student dormitories? Why was this option not pursued?

2. Has FHDA considered the ongoing maintenance costs for 94 individual 50- year-old apartments—each with its own kitchen and bathrooms—when occupied by 332 young adults, who might not maintain it responsibly as common tenants?

3. How do these costs compare to maintaining a typical student dormitory, which often features a shared kitchen per building and one or two large shared bathrooms per floor?
In particular, has FHDA considered the potential efficiencies of newly constructed dormitories with state-of-the-art facilities for technology access?

4. Which option is more affordable for students—purchasing older apartment units or constructing new dormitories on campus?

5. Has FHDA estimated the additional public safety costs associated with maintaining off-campus student housing?
Would FHDA cover these costs, or is there an expectation that the City of Cupertino would bear them?
Based on the experiences in other cities, like Berkeley, there are additional public safety issues for student housing, compared with housing for family units, as you must know.

As Mayor of Cupertino, I must carefully evaluate the impact that off-campus student housing will have on our City. I appreciate any information you can share, and I look forward to discussing these issues further.

I hope FHDA fully utilizes the 120-day due diligence period to thoroughly evaluate these options and questions, ensuring that purchasing McClellan Terrace for off-campus student housing is both socially responsible and fiscally sound.

Warm regards,
Liang
Mayor, City of Cupertino
Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192

From: Liang Chao
To: City Clerk
Cc: Kitty Moore
Subject: Fw: Agenda Item Request - consider Finch Property for potential purchase or other partnership with CUSD Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 11:00:17 AM
Please add this to the Written Communication for the Agenda 14 TBD list to provide some context to the agenda item request for the potential purchase of the Finch Property.

Thanks,
Liang
Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192
From: Jerry Liu <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 2:19 PM
To: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Cc: Stacy McAfee-Yao <[email protected]>; Kitty Moore <[email protected]>; Pamela Wu <[email protected]>; Floy Andrews <[email protected]>; Nancy Mak <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Agenda Item Request - consider Finch Property for potential purchase or other partnership with CUSD

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Liang,
Thanks for the thread to pull everyone together. A couple of notes to add context to your summary:

1. On the observation that CUSD is interested in selling Finch, I just want to add the full context that we're interested in a property exchange to exchange the Finch asset into another real estate investment that generates a revenue stream. Similar to our Montebello property exchange last year, this will likely involve multiple transactions with multiple parties, and we've engaged with a real estate firm to help with this. Any transaction we'd have with the City regarding Finch would be just one part of the exchange and the City wouldn't be involved in other parts of this exchange.

2. Superintendent Yao will be back in town on April 19. I'm staying a few extra days after the student delegation events and will be back on April 22.

I think we are on the same page - not seeing any differences in understanding. We can use the Friday time to discuss perhaps what information the City needs from the District to have a productive discussion during your May 6 council meeting? Thanks,
Jerry
On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 4:18 PM Liang Chao <[email protected] > wrote:

CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Added Floy Andrews, our new City Attorney. Chris Jew, CUSD's CTO. Nancy Mak, CUSD's Executive Assistant.

Thank you, Jerry, for the discussion yesterday to clarify that CUSD is indeed interested in selling the Finch Property at market value, but the property has not been assessed yet.

While CUSD is interested in investing the income from the sell in other revenue generating options, the sell of the Finch Property could be done independent from any revenue-generating option CUSD might pursue.

That's my understanding from Jerry. I hope to confirm that we are on the same page.

I initially was very confused since Pamela has told me in very concern language repeatedly that "CUSD does want to sell" since January 2025. Back in August 2024 Cupertino City staff has told CUSD that "Cupertino has no money".

Then in October 2024, Pamela has told CUSD that Cupertino City has no interest in purchasing since she stated:
"The City was asked if there is any plan to lease or purchase the Finch property. I informed CUSD that the City has no plan to either lease or purchase the Finch property. This is not part of the current CIP project and the City was in no financial condition to make any further purchase.”
Then, finally in March 2025, I realized that I need to proactively reach out to CUSD to ensure that we communicate effectively.

Thus, I hope to clarify some things here so that we are on the same page.

The current uncommitted balance of the parkland dedication fee is about $13M, according to the info memo February 13, 2025 - Parkland Dedication Fees(PDF, 243KB). There is about $22M potential parkland fees from already entitled projects and another $20M from current pending projects.

The City Council was never consulted back in August 2024 or October 2024 to weigh in on any interest to consider an option to purchase or lease the Finch Property. No information was given to the Council, and no input was sought from the Council at that time.

There has been community interest in keeping the Finch Property to serve the public interest, either through the City or through the school district.

Vice Mayor Kitty Moore and Mayor Chao do have a strong interest to look into the possibility of purchasing the Finch Property or partnering with CUSD in some way so that the Finch Property benefits the community.

However, the Council does need more information in order to decide whether the purchase or any other option is reasonable for the City's best interest.

Jerry did say that CUSD wishes to have some resolution on the Finch Property in the next few months. But I am not certain whether you have a hard deadline for any decision.

I would propose to agendize an item in open session for the May 6 Council meeting so that the Council could decide on whether the Council intends to consider the purchase of the Finch Property, likely with the parkland dedication fee.

The agenda for the May 6 meeting would be published by April 29. It would be helpful if the agenda packet includes
the info memo on the current and projected parkland dedication fee.

The property information about the Finch Property and any public information, any improvement or environment cleanup done so far.

Any information on potential assessed value of the property or similar property (if the information is public)
Any information from CUSD on their intention with the Finch Property and any other partnership options besides selling the property might be helpful.

I suppose as a part of the May 6 agenda, the Council might designate a city staff to be the negotiator or get a consultant to negotiate with CUSD. Then, there will more discussions in closed sessions with any due diligence report and assessment report. (For this portion, I would rely on the city staff to guide us on any legal requirement.)
I know that both Jerry and Stacy are leaving on April 12 for Taiwan to join their student delegation in Hsinchu and won't be back until April 24.

And the entire week of April 13 is CUSD holiday where the office is closed.

If we are all on the same page with what I've written above, it seems we don't really need a meeting where Kitty or I or Jerry need to attend.

It seems as long as the staff can coordinate to get sufficient information for the upcoming May 6 council meeting, that is fine.

Therefore, I have added Chris Jew since he might be able to provide whatever information needed even if Stacy might be away.

Regards,
Liang
Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192
From: Jerry Liu <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 10:15 AM
To: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Cc: Stacy McAfee-Yao <[email protected]>; Kitty Moore <[email protected]>; Pamela Wu <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Agenda Item Request - consider Finch Property for potential purchase or other partnership with CUSD

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Liang,
Your idea of having a discussion among two council members and two board members and staff sounds appropriate for the 2x2 meetings that has been set up. I would suggest we agendize Finch for the next meeting and also move up the schedule as one just occurred a few weeks ago and these tend to be only a few times a year.

The district has held multiple public meetings discussing our property plans. The last major discussion was during our board advance in January. The slides are at preview.png
CUSD Board Advance Jan. 23, 2025
PDF Document · 14.1 MB
and the property section starts on slide 81. I’m also including the two slides on Finch here:

The meetings are recorded and available for viewing but the gist of the recommendation is that we exchange our real estate holdings from an illiquid form to one that generates ongoing revenue. Identifying new revenue sources is an increasingly urgent issue as our current multi-year budget projection shows us not able to maintain the traditionally 6% reserve, and we just this month issued layoff notices to some of our staff.

The CUSD board has reviewed the Finch options multiple times and asked many questions since last summer so I think at this point we should be able to provide any information that the city council needs. I would invite you to send your questions to Stacy as soon as possible. I do think the district needs to move forward on this decision soon, given our budget gaps and the uncertainty around education funding in this climate.

Thanks,
Jerry
Jerry Liu
Governing Board Member
Cupertino Union School District
[email protected]
865-377-9548 (86-JERRY-LIU)
WeChat, WhatsApp: jerryjliu
On Mar 26, 2025, at 5:12 AM, Liang Chao <[email protected]> wrote:

CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

We hope to start an informal discussion about the Finch Property to get some basic information and understand CUSD's plan between two councilmembers and two board members, and of course relevant staff members.

What do you think?
My sense is that there is a desire in the community to keep the Finch Property for public use, rather than seeing it developed into private use, such as for housing. However, I think the Council needs more information before deliberating on the issue, both on the property, on CUSD's plan and on our plans with the current and future Park Impact Fees or other funds.

Regards,
Liang
Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192

From: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 6:50 PM
To: Pamela Wu <[email protected]>, Floy Andrews
<[email protected]>
Cc: Kitty Moore <[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item Request - consider Finch Property for potential purchase or other partnership with CUSD
Finch Property was included in one of the proposed FY 2025-27 Work Program for evaluating city properties.

I am told that CUSD would likely make decisions about Finch Property in a few months so the City of Cupertino should make a decision on our interest.

Therefore, I hope to add this to the Council agenda for consideration.

Ideally, the agenda item should include the following
information:

Information about the Finch Property itself.

Any communication about the Finch Property from
CUSD.

The info memo on the current balance and estimated
future parkland impact fee.

I wonder whether it might be more efficient to conduct a special joint meeting with CUSD Board since the
communication with the CUSD Superintendent and their board members have been inconsistent. Thus, it might be best to have a joint meeting.

Thank you,

Liang

Image removed by sender.

Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192
Image removed by sender.

Image removed by sender.

From: Liang Chao <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2025 4:28 PM
To: Jerry Liu <[email protected]>; Stacy McAfee-Yao
<[email protected]>
Subject: Parkland dedication fees: current balance and projected income

As I have said a few times, the Cupertino City Council has not agendized the item for Finch Property to have any discussion.

Whether the city has funding in the general fund is not relevant since any funding for any parkland purchase would likely come from parkland dedication fees.

Personally, I do not have a position on that until I have more data on the current and projected parkland dedication fees and until receive public input and had a council discussion.

Thus, we have asked for an info memo on the current balance and projected parkland dedication fees.

02 - February 13, 2025 - Parkland Dedication Fees(PDF, 243KB)

From that memo, the current uncommitted balance of the
parkland dedication fee is about $13M.
"The Park Dedication Fund began Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 with an opening fund balance of $19,046,081, as reported in the FY 2023-24 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. Accounting for budgeted revenues of $478,000 and expenditures of
$5,940,456, the available balance to date is $13,583,625."

There is about $22M potential parkland fees from already entitled projects and another $20M from current pending projects.

However, the recent trend is that the developers are requesting the city to waive parkland impact fees.

For example, Vallco Property Owners received about $70M in fee waivers (Traffic Impact fee) in a settlement.

The report also goes on to estimate a total of $140M in parkland impact fees from the 3,237 new units from the current 2025-2031 Housing Element, provided all of the planned new units are entitled and built. But the performance depends on the market condition for the builders and their investors.

Liang

Image removed by sender.

Liang Chao
Mayor
City Council
[email protected]
408-777-3192
Image removed by sender.

Image removed by sender.

--
-----
Jerry Liu
Board President
Cupertino Union School District
[email protected]
86-JERRY-LIU (865 377 9548)
From: Peggy Griffin
To: City Council
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: 2025-04-15 City Council Meeting - AGENDA ITEM 14-Review Future Agenda Items Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 2:05:40 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

PLEASE INCLUDE THIS EMAIL AS PART OF WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE ABOVE MEETING AGENDA ITEM.

Dear Mayor Chao, Vice Mayor Moore and Councilmembers,

In the Staff Report for this item, they recommend the following:
#1-13, accept staff recommendations
#14-18, provide staff direction

CONCERN REGARDING SEVERAL ITEMS IN STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
#1-4 are all related to remodeling/interim city hall location REQUEST: These could be removed from the list BUT the information needs to be presented in public when an interim City Hall comes up for discussion. Maybe move these to the City Hall work program?

#8 Study session for CIP approval process
REQUEST: Once a CIP project gets “approved” by being added to the list, it still needs to be reviewed like any private development project. It should come before the Planning Commission for review. Many of these projects have designs which should be vetted by staff but also by commissions and the public.

ITEMS NEEDING STAFF DIRECTION:
#14 Sound amplification devices in parks – REMOVE IT!
We don’t need music blaring when we go to our parks to relax and enjoy the peace and quiet of our open spaces. There is so much noise all around us from I-280, Hwy 85, airplanes, etc.

Please remove this item. We have a process for people to get an exception via a permit. Keep it that way.

#15 Restore previous Audit Committee responsibilities – AGENDIZE IT-as soon as possible!

#16 Put transportation projects under Planning Commission – AGENDIZE IT-as soon as possible!

#17 Proclamations and Certificates-guidelines and procedures – AGENDIZE IT!

#18 Consider Finch Property for purchase or partnership w CUSD – AGENDIZE IT-as soon as possible!

I’d like to thank the staff and the council for making progress on these items.

Sincerely,
Peggy Griffin
From: Jennifer Griffin
To: City Council; City Clerk
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Purchase of Finch Property by Cupertino
Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 6:57:14 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
(Please include the following as public input for Item #14 on the City Council agenda For the 4/15/25 meeting concerning the purchase of the Finch Property adjacent to Sedgwick Elementary School by the City of Cupertino, hopefully for parkland) Dear City Council:

Thank you for having the potential purchase of the Finch Property, directly adjacent to Sedgwick Elementary School, by the city of Cupertino, be an item to be considered by the City Council.

I am very happy that the city is considering purchasing the property as it is in an excellent Location for a park, being so deep into the neighborhood of Rancho Rinconada, Loree Estates And Fairgrove and other communities. It is also adjacent to the three schools of Cupertino High School, Hyde Middle School and Sedgwick Elementary School, all within the boundaries of the City of Cupertino.

I have attended many meetings over the past years concerning the Finch property, and I am greatly In favor of Cupertino purchasing the land for parkland. It is not a good location for high density Housing because of the traffic impacts on the adjacent areas and roadways, especially with children From the three schools so close by, coming and going etc. The property sits on a tight corner And with many intersections close by and wound not be suitable for an increase of traffic.

There is also a very large redwood tree on the Finch property that is at least eight feet in diameter.

I would imagine this tree is at least 80 years old or more as it is the size of the redwood tree On my brother's property in Los Gatos where the Victorian house was built in 1893. The redwood on His property was planted at about the same time as the house and is the same size as the Finch tree.

That redwood is now about 130 years old so the Finch Redwood could be 100 years or more.

The Finch Redwood could not be taken down and it is perfectly located on the Finch Property for A park tree. It is truly a specimen tree. It is amazing to have a potential park come already housing Such a perfect specimen tree! Imagine the wildlife and birds that call that huge tree home! The eastern neighborhoods of Cupertino do not have very many parks. Acquiring the Finch Property As potential parkland would benefit so many people. It is a jewel that is waiting to become a much Beloved park. The work we do today ensures that generations to come have parkland to enjoy! It appears that there is adequate money in the city's park dedication fee fund to purchase the Finch Property for a park.

One idea might be to have Cupertino take the half of the property with the large redwood tree and Have that become a community park for the neighborhoods and Cupertino. The other half Of the parcel adjacent to Sedgwick School could be retained by the school district as an annex of Land for Sedgwick Elementary School to house more classrooms or as sports fields.

I am so happy to think that Cupertino may be able to purchase the Finch Property for a future Park. This is such a wonderful prospect to imagine!
Thank you very much.

Best regards,
Jennifer Griffin
Resident of Eastern Cupertino
From: Tracy K
To: City Council; City Clerk
Subject: Written Comment -- Please Involve the Planning Commission in Transportation Projects Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 3:49:59 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

The norm for many neighboring cities is to involve the Planning Commission in transportation decisions. In fact, both Los Altos and Palo Alto have a joint Planning & Transit Commission.

Cupertino City CouncilApril 15, 2025

Cupertino City Council
April 15, 2025