cc 05-06-2025
Item No. 13
Modification to
Westport
Development
Written Communications
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
James Lloyd
Liang Chao; Kitty Moore; Sheila Mohan; J.R. Fruen; R "Ray" Wang; City Council Piu Ghosh Cshe/herl: City of Cupertino Planning Dept.: City Attorney "s Office; Cupertino City Manager"s Office; ~
public comment re item 13 for 5/6/25 Council meeting
Monday, May 5, 2025 2:54:51 PM
Cupertino - 21267 Stevens Creek Boulevard - HAA Letter - CC.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you rncognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Cupertino City Council,
The California Housing Defense Fund ("CalHDF") submits the attached public comment re item 13 for the 5/6/25 Council meeting, the proposed 272-unit housing development project at 21267 Stevens Creek Boulevard, including 29 units affordable to very low-income households.
Sincerely,
James M. Lloyd
Director of Planning and Investigations
California Housing Defense Fund
j [email protected]
CalHDF is grant & donation funded
Donate today - https://calhdf.org/donate/
May 5, 2025
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: Proposed Housing Development Project at 21267 Stevens Creek Boulevard By email: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] CC: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
Dear Cupertino City Council,
The California Housing Defense Fund ("CalHDF") submits this letter to remind the City of its obligation to abide by all relevant state housing laws when evaluating the proposed 272-unit housing development project at 21267 Stevens Creek Boulevard, including 29 units affordable to very low-income households. These laws include the Housing Accountability Act ("HAA"), the Density Bonus Law ("DBL"), and AB 2097.
The HAA provides the project legal protections . It requires approval of zoning and general plan compliant housing development projects unless findings can be made regarding specific, objective , written health and safety hazards . (Gov. Code, § 65589.5, subds. (d), (j).) The HAA also bars cities from imposing conditions on the approval of such projects that would render the project infeasible or reduce the project 's density unless, again , such written findings are made . (Id. at subd . (d).) As a development with at least two-thirds of its area devoted to residential uses , the project falls within the HMs ambit , and it complies with local zoning code and the City's general plan . Increased density , concessions , and waivers that a project is entitled to under the DBL (Gov. Code,§ 65915) do not render the project . noncompliant with the zoning code or general plan , for purposes of the HAA. ( Gov. Code, § 65589.5, subd . (j)(3).) The HMs protections therefore apply, and the City may not reject the project except based on health and safety standards , as outlined above.
CalHDF also writes to emphasi ze that the DBL offers the proposed development certain . protections . The City must respect these protections . In addition to granting the increase in residential units allowed by the DBL, the City must not deny the project the proposed waivers 360 Grand Ave #323, Oakland 94610
www.ca lhdf.org
and concessions with respec t to ground floor retail, in addition to the previously approved waivers and concessions, unless it makes written findings as required by Government Code, section 65915, subdivision (e)(1) that the waivers would have a specific, adverse impact upon health or safety, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact , or as required by Government Code, section 65915, subdivision (d)(1) that the concessions would not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions, that the concessions would have a specific , adverse impact on public health or safety, or that the concessions are contrary to state or federal law. The City, if it makes any such findings , bears the burden of proof. (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd . (d)(4).) Of note, the DBL specifically allows for a reduction in required accessory parking in addition to the allowable waivers and concessions . (Id . at subd . (p).) Additionally, the California Court of Appeal has ruled that when an applicant has requested one or more waivers and/or concessions pursuant to the DBL, the City "may not apply any development standard that would physically preclude construction of that project as designed, even if the building includes 'amenities' beyond the bare minimum of building components ." (Bankers Hi/1150 v. City of San Diego (2022) 74 Cal.App.5th 755, 775.)
Finally, the project is exempt from off-street parking pursuant to AB 2097 given its location near transit. CalHDF understands that City staff is contesting the applicability of the law to the project, given that the previous version of the project was entitled before the law came into effect.
First, the project is seeking amended entitlements , and staff have accordingly forced the project to go through additional environmental review accordingly. A denial of the amended entitlements would be a denial of the project , governed by the restrictions imposed on the City by the HAA, outlined above. The presence of any previous entitlement on the site does not change the need for the city to make findings under the HAA for any denial of the project currently under consideration .
Additionally, AB 2097 clearly states "Therefore, this section shall be interpreted in favor of the prohibition of the imposition of mandatory parking minimums as outlined in this section ." (Gov. Code,§ 65863.2, subd . (i).) The Legislature has clearly articulated its intent that local agencies should interpret the law as prohibiting parking requirements .
Furthermore, the California Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") has issued guidance that AB 2097 can , in fact, be applied retroactively . From page 6 of the linked January 2025 memorandum :
Can AB 2097 be used to eliminate an existing parking agreement 7 Yes, with the exception of contractual commercial parking agreements with a public agency that were executed before January 1, 2023.
2of3
The parking in question is not a contractual commercial parking agreement with a public agency, and therefore the HCD guidance is that AB 2097 can be used to eliminate the parking agreement between the applicant and the city.
Finally, it is unclear why the City is fighting to impose parking requirements on assisted living and memory care units, where residents are likely unable to drive or choose not to.
As you are well aware, California remains in the throes of a statewide crisis-level housing shortage. New housing such as this is a public benefit; it will provide badly-needed affordable housing; it will bring increased tax revenue and new customers to local businesses; and it will reduce displacement of existing residents into homelessness. Most importantly, it will allow seniors to age with dignity by providing invaluable assisted living and memory care housing . While no one project will solve the statewide housing crisis, the proposed development is a step in the right direction . CalHDF urges the City to approve it, consistent with its obligations under state law.
CalHDF is a 501(c)3 non-profit corporation whose mission includes advocating for increased access to housing for Californians at all income levels, including low-income households.
You may learn more about CalHDF at www.calhdf.org.
Sincerely,
Dylan Casey
CalHDF Executive Director
James M. Lloyd
CalHDF Director of Planning and Investigations
3of3
From :
To:
Subject:
Date :
Attachments:
radler digiolaces com
~
PPT slides for May 6 City Council meeting, Item # 13
Monday, May 5, 2025 10:55:33 AM
Richard Adler 5 6 25.pptx
CAUTION: This email originated fro m outside of th e organizati on. Do not clicl< links or open attac hments unless you recognize t he sender and know the content is safe.
Attached is a Powerpoint presentation (3 slides) that I would like to use with a public comment I plan to make in relation to Item #13 on the City Council meeting agenda for tomorrow night, May 6th (Modification to a previously approved Development Permit and Architectural & Site Approval for the Westport Development) .
Thank you,
Richard Adler
Age Friendly Cupertino
Presentation to
Cupertino City Council
Item #13:
Westport Development Permit Modification
Richard Adler
Age-Friendly Cupertino
May 6, 2025
Cupertino's 65+ and 75+ Population
2015-2035
- Age 65+ - Age 75+
25.0%
20.0%
20.0%
15.0% 13.1% 14.4%
,
10.5%
a 11:.01.. \ 10.0%
5.5% 6.2% 7.2%
5.0%
0.0%
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Richard Adler May 6, 2025 2
Assisted Living
Units Available
Need for Assisted Living by Age
A<J.e 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90+
2025:
221
Richard Adler May 6, 2025
2035:
? •
3 Prevalence of Alzheimer's
in Cupertino's 65+ Population
Memo ry Care
Units Availab le:
2025
8,445
Cupertino's
65+ population
10.6%
% with Alzheimer's
895
65+ residents
with Alzheimer's
103
Richard Adler May 6, 2025
2035
11,400
Cupertino's
65+ population
11%
% with Alzheimer's
1,250
65+ residents
with Alzheimer's
? •
4 Data Sources
1. Cupertino's 65+ Population, 2015-2035
2015 City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Master Plan Demographic Analysis (2016) 2020 Same as above (updated for 2020)
2025 Neilsberg demographic insights
2030-35 Projections:
Santa Clara County Office of Aging Reports
State of California Department of Finance populat ion projections U.S. Census Bureau trends and regional aging patterns in Silicon Valley
2. Prevalence of Alzheimer's in Cupertino, 2025-2035
Alzheimer's Association: 2024 Alzheimer's Disease Facts and Figures trt1Q.S.;/LlivwwAlz.org/media/DoCJJIJ18nts/alLheimers-facts-and-figures.pdf California Department of Public Health-Alzheimer's in California https://www.cdph.ca.gov
U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates and Projections Santa Clara County Public Health Department-Aging and Health Reports https • //pu blichea lth. sccgov.org
Neilsberg Demographic Report·s (2025 estimates)
bll~_WYV~e.il.s..be.rg,com/insigbtsL.cupertino-ca-QQQ.Ula:tio.n:b.y2age/ Richard Adler May 6, 2025 5
From: DeWitt , Cascade <cascade .zak@related .com >
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2025 1 :32 PM
To: Nicholas Roosevelt <nroosevelt@jabramslaw .com >; Liang Chao <[email protected] >; City Council <citycouncil@cupertino .gov> Cc: James Abrams <[email protected] >; Simsik, Balint <Balint .Simsi [email protected] >; Gian Martire <GianM@cupertino .gQ_y'>; Floy Andrews <FloyA@cupertino .gov>; City Attorney's Office <cityattorney@cupe rtino.gov> Subject: RE: Letter Regarding Item #13 on City Council's Agenda for May 6 (Westport Project Building #1)
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization . Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Please try this link:
https :/ /related. box.com/s/gf05uttembjt7hgk3d2frcqyfnhg21 xi Cascade Zak DeWitt
(415) 342-4638
cascade.zak@related .com
From: Nicholas Roosevelt <[email protected] >
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2025 12:55 PM
To: [email protected] ; citycouncil@cupertino .gov
Cc: James Abrams <[email protected] >; Simsik, Balint <Balint.S imsik@re lated.com >; DeWitt, Cascade <cascade.zak@ related .com >; Gian Martire <[email protected] >; Floy Andrews <[email protected]@ >; [email protected]
Subject: Letter Regarding Item #13 on City Council's Agenda for May 6 (Westport Project Building #1)
Dear Mayor Chao and Councilmembers-
In the following link, please find a letter regarding tomorrow 's hearing on the proposed modifications to Westport Project Building 1 (Item #13 on the Council's agenda for tomorrow evening) :
https ://www.dropbox .com/scl/fi/bo74navus1 i21wi48hrs4/J-Abrams- Letter-re-Westport Revised-Program .pdf?rlkey =0fajpzbthtz0s25jp5rpwne8b&dl=0 [dropbox.com] Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any issue accessing the file link (the link is necessary as opposed to an email attachment due to the size of the attached September 6, 2024 plan set for the proposed modifications).
Thanks,
Nick
Nick Roosevelt
J. Abrams Law, P.C.
538 Hayes Street
San Francisco, CA94102
Email: nroosevelt@jabramslaw .com
Cell: (504)-717-9251
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosu re or distribution is prohibited . If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message .
The information contained in this message and any attachment(s) may be privileged, confidential, proprietary or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient , you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution , copying or use of this message and any attachment is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this email and permanently delete the message from your computer . Nothing contained in this message and/or any attachment(s) constitutes a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities .
VIAE-EMAIL
May 5, 2025
Liang Chao
Mayor
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
[email protected]
Re: Westport Cupertino Project , Building 1
Dear Mayor Chao and Councilmembers:
J. ABRAMS LAW, P.C.
538 Hayes Street
San Francisco , CA 94102
Nick Roosevelt
[email protected] law.com
This firm represents the project sponsor of the "Building l" development ("Building l ") within the Westport Cupertino project (the "Project "). The City Council is scheduled to hear proposed modifications to the Project on May 6, 2025. In advance of the hearing we wish to raise the following issues with the City Council.
AB2097 & Condition Regarding Additional Parking
We refer you to our April 18, 2025 letter to the Planning Commission, which provides detailed reasoning why the Staff Repo11 in the case file for your May 6 hearing incorrectly asse11s that the Project is not eligible to use AB2097 to reduce its required parking (the letter can be found on page 25 of the public comment pdf included in the case file for the May 6, 2025 hearing). We were disappointed to see the Planning Commission adopt the staff report's recommended condition of approval requiring that the Project add 20 additional surface parking spaces , but reiterate that in the interest of expedient approval of the Project, the project sponsor is willing to work with Planning staff on modifying the Project's site plan to include 20 additional parking spaces . This would require reconfiguration of the ground-level plan for the site, likely including changes to the currently proposed landscaped and open areas and potentially including modifications to the building 's first-level floor plan to arrive at a more efficient parking layout capable of suppo11ing the additional 20 spaces .
We continue to maintain that the City Council should reject the recommendation of staff and the Planning Commission and conclude that AB2097 does not permit the City Council to condition Project approval on the requirement to add 20 additional parking spaces . However, should the City Council ultimately chose to include the condition , we would ask that the Council's condition clarify that any design modifications necessary to accommodate 20 additional spaces shall be reviewed and finally approved by Planning staff, without additional hear ings before the Plannin g Com mission or City Co uncil.
Plan Set
The case file for the May 6 hearing does not include the record plan set proposed by the project sponsor for approval and instead only includes a site plan sheet. Further , the draft approvals include in the case file for the May 6 hearing reference the initially submitted plan set for the Project dated April 1, 2024 , instead of the latest resubmittal of the plan set addressing staff comment dated September 6, 2024. For the sake of record clarity , we have attached the September 6, 2024 plan set to this letter as Attachment 1 and hope that staff will clarify on May 6 the correct plan set date reference for the Project's approvals.
Please note that we have made one change to the September 6, 2024 record plan set included as Attachment 1, which is a redline annotation on the cover sheet (Sheet G 11) flagging that the listed parking figures are subject to the analysis and modifications recommended by staff in the Staff Report for the May 6 hearing (discussed on the previous page of this letter) .
Increased Retail/ Reduced Park Land Fee
In response to the Planning Commission ' s additional recommend ed condition of approval intended to incentivize adding 4,000 squar e feet of retail by waiving some or all of the Park Land Dedication In-Lieu Fee, City staff requested supplemental sponsor feedback on the feasibility and cost of including additional retail space on the ground floor of Building 1, the sponsor team conducted a preliminary assessment and believes it may be feasible to add approximately 2,500 square feet of additional retail space on the ground floor. Achieving this outcom e would require relocating ce1tain uses to Level 6, expanding the building ' s overall gross square footage , and reducing the currently proposed setbacks on Level 6 (that is, the building ' s currently proposed envelope would increase at Level 6). Sponsor estimates the increased cost to implement these changes would be approximately $3 million.
These figures are based on an early-stage analysis , initiated specifically at City staffs request to evaluate the Planning Commission ' s recommended condition added at its hearing regarding the potential for any incremental retail that could be added and at what cost.
Notably , to sponsor's knowledge , City staff have not identified a pathway by which any incentive to add retail by waiver of the Park Land fee might be approved. Importantly , to maintain the financial viability of the Project, it is critical that no additional delays or discretionary approvals occur beyond the scheduled May 6, 2025 hearing . 2 We look forward to presenting the Project to the City Council on May 6 and respec tfully request the City approve the requested modifications in a manner consistent with requests and clarifications set forth in this letter.
CC:
All City Councilmembers
citycounci l@cupertino .gov
Nick Roosevelt
Gian Martire
Senior Planner
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino , CA 95014-3255
[email protected]
3 Floy Andrews
City Attorney
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre A venue
Cupertino , CA 95014
[email protected]
ATTACHMENT 1
Record Plan Set Dated September 6, 2024
(including redline annotation re parking on Sheet GI 1) 4 WESTPORT CUPERTINO BUILDING 1
ENHANCED SENIOR AND FAMILY LIVING PROJECT (REVISED)
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
.?i2G7 STEVENS CREEK BL VO
CUPERTINO. CA
REV.TI:OCOI.IP~ll fS , l LC
STflNllf:ROHAllT
!NIBATTERVST SUITE)O(l
s.>.r. Ff\111-ICISCO.C""\1,,1111
MIMlENIOIIN
•ll'J1CH11EIOT CR1\'E. SUITE :IOO
Pl EA.SMIT ON. CA 1,,15111
"" 785 MAP.t< ET S1REET.5U!TE500
SANFR~CISCO CAU 103
·---·•··· .. ----··· "" . ~-... - ,,_ ...... _ .... -. s.---, ----~~ ,, ... ,..
COVER SHEET
GOO
PROJECT SUMMARY REVISIONS
This updated shee.1 reflect the changes proposed lor building , on tho entiUod sheet G202A.
Any updates from olhor parcels (Bu!ldlng 2, Townhooses) are no1 reflecied he1e.
1. PROJECT REVISIONS TO BUILDING 1 INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING Tho curved (51cklo) ponlon of the building along Mory Avenue Increased In deplh by B'-0" from Iha entitled plan in order to meel tho needs IOf cloar space and access for seniors drcu1ollon within their roslden tlol units.
Memory care 1errace mcMKI to the Inside of the lll..lildlng to overlook the central green , rather than the panllng lot.
Revision of lhe grounCI floor height from 20'-0• lo 16'-0" and incremental Increases 10 lloo~ helghls above In order to optimize floor heights for residentlel occupancy. The building overall height Is now 78'-8".
Addition of therapy pool terrace and wellness/gym al ground floor. The si111h floor selback.s have lneteased. This modification will significantly reduce the wsstern building elevation and perceived height or the bulldlng along Stevens Creek Boul&vard.
Thero has been an overall reduction ol tho ro!all space. We havo rotalnO<l rotail &p&al at tho comers that face Steven Crook boulevard and at lhe ln1ersectlonolMaryavenue .
Revision to uni! types and mht Including increasing the number or memo,y care units, as the noea was highlighted by the community and Aging Cuperllno.
If s,~ m: o< hao ""~" ,omo,e d l6.
Revision 10 unh iypes and mhc lneluding Increasing the number or memory ca,e units, as the need was highlighted by the community and Aging Cupenlno, and two-bodroom units tor couplos and reducing the number of smaller studios.
2. PROJECT PROGRAM SUMMARY:
• Senior Living / Aalall Building 1: 6-s101les:
117,303 SF rnsldenllal: 195,253 GSF
171 senior living units (35 memory ca,&)
4,000 SF of ground-level re1a11.
lFV[l0,1
- t(VCI.Ol
0 LEVEL Q2
LEVt LUI
i~
,34,797Sf
l34.7005r
'J4,7J6Sr".
'.3s.7,1 zsf
.!.Z1.728Sf
1?5,Z~SF
3. PROYISK>HS TO VARY FROM HEART OF THE CITY PLAN PURSUANT TO STATE DENSITY BONUS LAW.
Slope solbaek wmvers tor Bulkllng 1 (senior housing,' commarci.il) trom 1:1 10 slope satb.ack currently illustra1od on Sheet G14.
ZONING CODE DATA REVISIONS
lt[SI DtNlW.(lit'.I.Alt:DSOClfi'~&.&DINQJ i,., ..
~jubios:ioSF l
1 li!i 1,~SF l'&11,_,1g SF 1~ m
".'?(ll\/,~0 -1!_
t Ot" .-,~
l[\i fl5
~ " "
~
"n ;;
"
Jq VA&.•J:,r,J~
;;
0 ;a1
See StaffReport for May 6; 2025
City Council hearing detailing
1staff-r!!commended , hanges to
proj ect parking .
~
'·""' .....
' IWACU,
t ~ •=:~ I /,\
•REt.l,.."llflG PARKING sPACES lO BE PROVlDEDOFF-SllE ~ f,'l.lBLTCP-l'liJ~ IJ[N T l'Elll .t9&?•°"°"'
8 §. 81CYCLE PARKING·
• Requ!rud Blcycitt Parking tor Each BuUdlng U1e. per Grettn Bultd\ng Standard• Non• Realaenual Mandntory Measure 5.106.4.1.1:
~
Long Tffl'ITl Ratllil (Cl/1111 II5% ol ,e Vehicle Sp3C81 11p11ect11 1 pmv!dltd - Required Bicycle Parklr,g for Each Bu/ldlr,g U58, perPmking Table 19.124.040(A):
~
Short Torm Retall (Clas& II) 1 f 1,250SF ◄ s pacaa/ ◄ providod
DRAWING INDEX
GENERAL
GOO COVER SHEET
Glt PROJECT SUMMARY
G12 SJTEAREA
~ UI~ ()~~ ACEJPRIVATEOPENSPA CE
G14 SJTE SETBACKS
Ol'r! '
ARCHITECTURAL
MO
A2'
A22
A23
""' A2,
A32
A33
Al<
SITE PLAN
LEVEL 1 PLAN
LEVEL2PLAN
LEVEL 3-5 PLAN
LEVEL6PLAN
ROOF PLAN
,~~\.~;
TYPICAL UNIT LAYOUTS
PUBLIC ARTWORK LOCATIONS
LIGHTING
LSK1 PHOTOt.lETRIC CALCULATIONS. SITE
PROJECT TEAM
H I.JllEO COW' tJIE :i, llC
+1 r.t0NTGOl<~ $ 11a:Cl5l/11'£1 '.lll0
SAl!f RMICiSCO.C.A i/,1,lllol
CON'f..C:T: ANA GOlOSTElN-kOGAN
~ .... ~ ......
119.8ATTEIIY5l llt:El,$Uf!E:JOO
51,NFIINOSCU,C4 !l<IIOI
CONflCT : ASHESHH SAHEBA
--a-gNf\""'11
"t05)ti0l-2ll2,
al!U7 Cl'IAW T ORIVl!SUIT'El00
Pl.f ASA:'l TON, C,,.;,i :,M
C()NI AC'T,IMRKrALGOU I
-
P(!l1:illllll > 7ro 1
UCHTIHO
"" 785MAfll<E1SlREET,SUlll: 800
SAN FRANCISCO, CAO"IO J
CONTACT· ARAN!Xm TliRASl-!ER
t l!Y'"-@hbl,gnllogCO!II
m.2~ 6.:?r.Jll OIRECl
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
l!267 STEVENS CRF.[ K Bl VO
CUPERTINO CA
REL.J,'fl!OCOI.IPf<tlll!S. ~LC.
~, l,IOIITOOM~AY5TIICCT.SUITC t:l,QD
SANFR/lt1C1SCO,CA ll,10,&
SlE ttlRERO tlARl
NBATTERV!lllluflElOO
SANFRAHCl~ . CA!Mlll
IIINl.t:T•llOl\li
"37CIIA00l OfflVE, 5\lllE!IIIO
PLCASANTON. CA~~
"" 785MARIIETSTREEl . 5UITE&OO
SAN FRANCISCO. CA UIOl
: =.:-t;;;~~~- ........
PROJECT SUMM ARY
G11
, ..
'.' ',
"._\ '
,,·,·
. -~' ',,
I
/
'., {
''
\ ',
•\
\',
' . ~
\ \\'
,·, \
\\ ~\
-~--~;,
---LJ,.l.
• .11111111111111111 - -
L !J
' i
I/~/ - . • __ : ··- •• =:_:·::a_~ - - MARYAVE
' C'\~~l 1 1 1 I' : : ·-- -
-•..;-;,:_.
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
~ =-~ - -
SITE AREA LEGEND :
□ GROSSSOCAACA•l52.Al11Sf!l .1- )
NEl5ft E AA£A ~l-tJ .- Sf f1&-I
I]
lllll.DIPIGCOVERAOEAAEA.• n l.lll l lll'
11Z.ll2 1:M3.!1!.ll- l2.17'Ao KET5ITE
■ l<ARDSCAJ'E AAEA• U7,SM IU'
137,~ 1:W3,YSll• 40.00'll.H£TSITE
lANOSCA.PEAAEA•9LI711111'
IIZ.Z711 t :Ml.!1511•26JN.HETSITE &
, D AMENmes- '7.550 •
' '
• '-·.~ . .,_-1...._~_
-~
■ '""'"'~
□ BOHISUPPOAT • 9,0,J , I
■ GROSS AREA RETAIL • 4.000 st
BLOG 1
□ "'~"'"'"""'"'' "--~
QnU1Q11/IUUedS(ILLIIIS&llOll!isG.."OGA.
A111111uvW11slpOf1pa1et111111ewuas w11nt
r~•lllntWlOgethllf . Thil~Wlhee11 11ft11CtS
tnachanga1 prapo68ClbB ulkinQ l lile 011l1, MV
upda1H ~ olotlr PNCtlLS (Budding 2. Townhomast
1~no1111tlec;\adh at 11.
'~t-·~
,:~1~.~:-\
1 1
1 ! 11 ' ..
1u11i.11d1111,_11i'1,
c:c
~--.. t - -
1111111111111111
I
~
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
212675 TEVENSCR[fK BLVD
CUPERTINO. CA
RE LATED C0"41'Nlll!! , LLC
, 4MO«T OOMCAY 6TR CCT,SUITC 1lOII
SAN FANIC ISCO , CAi-1 1D-I
STEINBEFIOHAAT
NBA TT ER'l'STSUIT ElOO
SAN FRNICISCO, CA 1-1111
KNLf'l'-IIOAN
, li370IAIIOT DRIVE. SUITE 000
Plu.sAHTON, CA9-iW
"' 7U WJ\KET S1'REET, SUIT E IOO
SAN FAANCISCO , CAU IDJ
SITE AREA
G12
g
i
~ .g s ii
~ =;
i~ 0
i:i
"~ ~ -~ ~
~· ~=- ~igf ~H z ~ ~ w i! (!) • •
~o 1 !
~·~h
w ~- ~§•.
~ ~i
z s
~ ..
l; ~ H~ iS!i
u ~· H
:s ~.!
~ ~i 1,;;
~~ .; ;
ulaa !~;• u . ..!
Cl)
~ □ □ □
' ~
-
ii
ii
-irl !."
J//4 ___ _ l ..•
I' '\
\\
I
\
\
\i
·· :\L:,,'
', ::)~~ <
1 ' "" ', ', <, , ,
.. \ ...
\ \, ~·
''
\..::\,
\ \
\. \.::::: ......
ElllSTINQ 117HIOt1 \
\ IJO WAI.L -1,-
\\ '
\\:\ \\
\\\ \\ \
":~,.
\
JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
MARY AVE
- -
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
"'-u ;_;
; I ,_,
'· ~ ---:: ~---
7.o-Toc!RRBOl' ERTY WIE (BLUEI
,-;-·L EDGE OF CURB
\
·1111111111111111
CB ,.....__
Xl co
I
WESTPORT
1 CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
21267 STEVENS CREEK BLVD.
CUPERTINO, CA
REl. ... TEDCm.lP-'lflES , LLC
.... MOIITGOMERY STREE'T SUITE noo
SANFR.0.NCISCO , CA&,11()4
STElt.lBERG>lMT
ll6SA.TTERYST , SUl1E300
SAUFR,t,NCISCO .CA. 6"111
l()Ml.EY-HORN
4aJ7CI-IABOTCRI\IE , SUITElOO
PI.E,l,SANTOtJ C.A &,IS~~
"-'
185MA.Rl<ET STREEl .SUITE800
SAN FRANCISCO CA !IJ10J
,., ..... , .. ~.,,_,,- ,-· -~--~
I ~~o..:._i.:_ooz. 100
I sou.
OA•WINC liTL!::·
I
I
SITE SETBACKS
'"'"""~- ~
ROOF OUTLINE OF
MASSING BEVONO
TERRACE
~.<,;,
'~.,:,
' ~c,...
' ' '· ',
' \
COMMUNAi. TE.;~ • ..... :~. I ,
IW
:~
:~ :~
l u
,5
·~ ·~ ,t
·~ ,.
I
-'-
IW
:~ ·~ ,u
_BQQI HIQO(
,a·-s· ,,. ..
10· 0· ii>
!a
SENIOR LJVIIJG ···,, ., , , ,~: '(
'-. • '
SENIOR LIVJNC
60'(1" 9
Lt. \lEJ..'16,:,
49'-r)· b
~I ..
l,13 ii>~
...J.EYI.U ::: g
21 -0· r,,-,
\ . \ I I
I '\,\. \ I I
·,,'~ -.
>,~ 'j I ----
~ / : \.~~\ :
~- I &J '-\_ 1 STEVENS CREEK BLVO,
'""{ '\ ·
I----'-----•..,..............,:.:..•~ ....---,:•-r - - 1T ·'""1 11· ·-11 ;'__:~:1•.'_-l!l~ -, 11~ -I Ii-! 1
,-,·~·_I' ' 11 _Ii;,"'_, I ''
I - 1_ , 1- ' - ' - 1 1- 1 ' ! 1- I ' -
- I' 1-1 1- l 1
1 = ! 11==
1 1=:·1: 1=--
1 I: - 1 i i- 1 1~-1 I- 1 - , 1- 11- - 1 - 1 1- 111 - 11 - I - I ,I 1- 1 I ,- I ,-- 1- 21·-0· I :--11'-IJ'.I- - - ! I 1-· - 1 I --11 - I I 'i I I==! I 1::=1 ..... := 35'~ I ==: 1==1 :::= 1=- 1 I .::...
=I I l--1 11~ -1 I 1.../-· + 1-+--"-'-· .. ·-0-..LH-----, I ! !==- I J-_J 11-_J I 1-_ -I 1=-! I l--1 11 - 111- . .:: 111-- 111__::__111-1 I 1-11 ' 'I -
SENIOR LIVING
SENMJRLMNC
I
RETAIL
~ ~El{Ej. l
}t,IJ
b
~
.!...
[-----..___,
------._,_ \
\ \
,,:_ -w.._,.- . l ! "\
[~~)
BUILDING I · SENIOR LIVlf/G/ RETAIL • SECTION AT LEVEL 6 THERAPY POOL TERRACE This updated sheet reflect the changes proposed for Building 1 on the enlilled sheet G204.
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
212C.7 STEVENS CRf.EK Bl VD
CUPERTINO. CA
AEt.,t,Tl!DC~Nn l!S. U.C
,,MON TOOMCR'l' &TRt CT.sutTE 1:!iCIO
SAH FRNiC lSCO, CA IM IO,I
STEIN6£RQ HAAT
N B,\n£R Y$T $UITE)OCI
SAH FRAI-IC+SCO CAIM 111
IUNI.EN ICION
, n1 CllliOOT OI\IYE, sunc ,CO
PltASNITOH , CA-. saa
"'" 785 MARKET S'TAEfT. SUITE &IIO
SAN FRANCISCO, CA H 11)3
SLOPE SETBACKS
G14
\.
)-
~
\
t
r·-·-· · •-·-·-·-·-·-·-·- ·· --· ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·--·-· i L ,, ---- .......... . ··-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·T-·r .... 1-~~~---r~~~;;::~~~ ........ i ......... , n
_ j ... , ....
i i ·,.,.
,j\ .......
• ~ ' I .,
f ', -~ .... ~
r (-- I I I / t n , -- , ,_ ~ '-
I/; ---------~ '·,
1 ~ i j)
I
() I; - , -...:~·,. I ' '· I ' '
/) -- \ ~\
/ \ ' / \ \
SEE PAOJECT StJMMAR'f SHEET G I I
see OPEN SPACE CAl.C SHEETS G!2, Gl 9 ANO G:.>06C FOR OPEN SPACE c.u;s
3. SEESHEETG11,A20ANOA2 I FOR PROJECT PARKING
■ F'IETAlLWITH RESC>E.NTIAI.AOOVE
□ LA!<ICY..CAP ING
-- .- ... ;-'--•-- --
Jj\
i jl
j
/ , , \ \
-$ / \.·' \
~ \
I i
I~
'] t
I
' ~
L
i--·-·-·-·-1
i .... r ..... .,..,,~ y.,.·-·~..,.....-·~-.,-,..,-·r-·.,,_..-·, .... ................ \ i
~ \
' ,- ~ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \' \ \ .
' \ \' \ . \
\ ,,---,\,
\ ' \ \ ', I} '
':: \·\
\~ \ \
\
i-1
:\ ·i
i i i
'i i
i i i
j
I i
-I i ,,, ,- EDGE OF CURB
i // - PROPERTY LINE
i /,
---r- -~--~ I ~. ~ , ~ )
-~:;;::~~::;:-~~~~~~----·-·-.l+-1J : ~ Ll J.=~~~ J -·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-•~ 1-•--·-·-·-\-,_,_, ___ , __ ,_,_, _____________ ~_ ·-·-·-·-·-·-·'; 1 ' I \ ~ t I'
ADJUSTED PROPERTY LINE L EDGE OF CURB
E9
---.J
! l~'
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
2 !267 STEVENSCR f:(K BLVD
CUPER TINO . CA
AELATEOCOMPANl eS, ~LC
44MOf.lTOOMERYSTRCCT SUITt lXIO
Sl<N FIWIC lSCO, CAi~lO,I
STEINOERQH,.RT
068"l1ERY5 1, SUITE300
SANFHAl!CISCO,CAIM11!
KIMlE'/·IIOON
•037C flo\DOTCRI VE. 5UITC 300
PLEASANTON, CA ~W
""' 785t.lAAKET 51AEEf ,5UITE 600
SAN FRANCISCO, CA &U OJ
__ .. i.- __ _
!,-..i-,,.;:.,1 ..,,;.:.;--
SITE PLAN
A10
~
' L__ - ~
'
7 I
_ /-TT"\ I J__J L__j I
I
I
'
=1_
_L_-~- ·.
--. " ~'•') ~ ~ '
I I I l I rx. ,>--~ •. "'' - PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK
I
I
\
I
I
,, \
I
I
-,:::;;S~'%Jf::>:)j n \
'~·: :: : : : : : : :: : :;::: ::•·
' I
I
I
ffi ~ "CJ7 17 ll~ ti J~
WESTPORT
CUP!::RTINO
BUILDING 1
21267 STEVENS CREEK F.!LVO,
CUPERTINO. CA
RELATEDCOMP.Vlll! S. U . .C
44 MOUfGOf,IERY 6TRCCT.SUl'Tt 1,00
SANFRANCISCO,CA!!-110<
STI:INBERG!V.IIT
!IBIIATTERTSTSUllElOO
SAN FI\At1CISC0.C,lik111
KNLEH()lll,I
.il37CltADOT DANE. 5UITEXi0
P!.EASI.NTON, CA 9-'S&a
"" 1!5 Mt.RKET STREET.SUITE800
SAN FRANC1SCO. CA s-103
PllOICClN0 •• '1002,IOll
LEVEL 1 PLAN
-
U~Al\ .....,NC .
A21
', " '- '
'- -------- . '""--,
'--....,_ '""
'- ' ' ' '- '- ~ PROPERTY LINE
'- ~ SETBACK
' / '\.\ ' /
,( '
'\ '
\ \
'\
' \ '
\ \
\
\ ' ' \
\ \
\ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I \
_L ____ 7
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,--.J
I
I
I
I 2BR
I
I
I
I
I
2BR lBR MC2 MCI I
I
I I I' I ~ II _\ I
I ~ em! ! - - - - - - - - _j ___ J _____ __ _____________ _______ _______ __ __ _ \
\
\
I
I
\
I
I
\
_________ _J /
/
/
-- -- -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - ---- -- - - -- - - -- - - -- -- -- - - ------ - - -- -/ ffi I""""-'
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
21267 STEVENS CR[EK BLVD
CUPERTINO. C.A
REL.ATEOCOl.1PNll~5.U.C
U I.IOIITGOMl:R'r' STR[CT ,sum: 1:IOO
SAHFP.Al!C1SCO, CAi<111J,1
STE~<IIERO HAAT
!19SAOERYST, 9Utll:l00
SAHFRAHC•S.CO, CA "4111
IIIMl.EHIOflN
~7 CHAOOT OAl~I:. SUITt :JOO
PLCASANT~.CA9,U8'
"" 7B5 MAflK£1STREET,SUITE800
SAN FR.\NCISCO, CAU 1D)
, ,_,.., __ _ .. ,~ .. __ __ ,, .. ... , .,.,
. "'"""'··••...:i.-;-........... _ ........ --------~
LEVEL 2 PLAN
A22
"-
----- '
--- ' "' ' ' ·,
' '
""
' '- 'v-- PROPERTY LINE
'- , ,,,,-- SETBACK
'-
'
',, ,,/ \
·< ' ' \ \ \ \
\ \
\
\ \
\ \
\
\
\ \
\ \
\
\
\ \ I
\
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
___ L ____ 7 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r __ .J
I
I
I
I
I
I
2BR I lBR I llll( I il!IIK I il!IIK I lBR I l BR I 26R I I I
I ~ " I
L I - I
- - - - 1 - - - - - ------ ---- -- - ------- - ~---- ------ --- --- ----~ I
I
___ _ __ _ __ _J
\
\
\
\
/ -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - --- - -- -- -- ---- - - -- -- --- - -- - - ---- -- - - --- - -- - - -- - - -- _, \
\
I
I
I
/
/
I
I
I
.OENSITYOOf.USUMTlEVEL50NLV
i:-bi--... w !I' 8 l~
I u
WESTPORT
CUPE:RTINO
BUILDING 1
2!2fl7 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
CUPERTINO. C.\
AEl.,lTEOCOMPA/ ;lfS, LLC
STI:INl!ERGHA RT
918A TTERYST . !IUIIE)OQ
SANFRAIICISCO, CAIM!ll
KIMLEY·IIOIIN
•&:i7CIIADOTOAIVE. SUITE300
Pl~f~.CAMSU
"" 7115MARKE'TSTREET,SUITE 800
SANF RN<ICISCO CA&411)J
LEVE L 3· 5 PLAN
A23
__ _ L ____ 7
I
I
---_J
I
I
_________ _]
2BR.
•
--- " --- ' '- '
'- '- "-' '
·, ', '"
' ' '- , 'v-PROPERTY LINE
'- '- , _,- SETBACK
', ,,/ '\ -< \ \
\ ' ·,
\ \
\
\
\
\
\
\ \
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
\
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r --...J
I
I
I
I
I
AMENITY EXT I --------=111""' - - 1!11 I I I
I
I
I
I
o AMENITY EXT J I I
I
I I
- - - ------- ---- - - ---- - - -- - - --- -------- --------~ I
I
\
I
I
\
/ ------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------' \
, ,
. DENSITVOOtlUSUNITS
ffi ~ I
~
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
212fi7 STEVENS CRt(~ BLVD
CUPERTINO. CA
AEL,1,TEDCOMPNllH. u .c
~, MONTOOMCAY Sl ACIT.SUIU llQO
SAN FRAHCISCO. CAUID-1
STEINflfACIHAlll
NIIATTEAVS T SIJITEXIO
SANFRA l,CJSCQ , C,.14111
KNlEM()HN
"ln701,,\DOTOAIVC. SUfTC:JCO
PUCAS,t,NTON, CA IMW
"" 785 1.1AflKf1SfREET , fiUITE800
SAN FRANCISCO C" UIOJ
~"~~ ... --~ ~
LEVEL 6 PLAN
A26
I
I
___ L 7
___ __ , ____ _
I
I
_________ _J
' ' ' ' ' ' '
"-
''""
'
'-, "' ' '- ' , '- ~ PROPERTY LINE
, ~ SETBACK
', \
' \ \
\ \
\ \
\
\ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
I
\
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
r __ _i
I I
'"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
________ _J
\
\
\
\
I
I
\
/
, ,
__ ,
I
I
I
rB ,..._, I u
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
2!2675TEVENSCijE£K BLVD
CUPERTINO, CA
RELATEO C0UP"1UES LLC
~~I.ION f COMEA't'&TR[CT$U(TE 1XIO
~ FR.\tlC1SCO, CAUlo-t
STE118EI\OIWIT
NBA "E AYSl SUl1El00
SAAi FRANCISCO. CA 1M 111
IIM!.E¥-110IW
"37 CIIAOOT Df'llvt. SU'Tt :l0D
P\.CASANTON. C#IN SM
"" 1&5 MARKET STl~EET, SUITE 800
SANFR'-HC!SCO CA &~ 1Q)
· -·-- - -~•-•t- --·- •'" · · - - '
• _ _ ,..I Wl""°oaolll...., "' "' -
-- - -·--- - -
·-
-- --
l't,'()JU;IN0,111lil.l.l0U
~CAl.l
ROOF PLAN
A27
SENIORLNING
SENIORLNING
SENIOR LMN G
SENIOR LIVING
~oooo~JA
ROOr~1riGE._
7g·.9·
EAVE
'"'
~-..l.f'lfl.
60'-(t ,
<;>
UV.EL" =
,;g·.o· •
CLVLL<4, I~
3B'·'J" ~16 ~
_J..EV;J,.J,- = ..,_
zr-o· ~
_ ..u.ya· ::::
l6'0"
9 ;,
--~;~
ROOfRIOCE
1a·a· ~
E.AVt '°
7u'-6" - ~
____L~
60 -0'' •
9 Ll:.VEL~1, :::l
-19•.o· •
~ mu •1~ I ~ 38'-0" 9 ~ ~
1.1:.vc1..1-= .....
9 ~
7~"Y
_
0 ,.,T,ELEVATION 2 16
' • ~ I, j. + + •
BUILDING SECTION
AJ)Qrrt1D\IE.
7e•-a· ~
EAVE . CO
70-6" ~
" LE,Vt:Lo-+=
o0·0· b
~
=~ -:~:~: ·.A ,,j ;
"!R"-\)" ~I b
l,,C'{(l ~...,
-- 2T-o· b
~
► ~\'HI
1e,·.,;-
L~V(.LJ
o·-0•
1tv1,111
·J ft.(,
~
..
NOTE
THIS UPDATED SHEET REFLECTS
THE CHANGES PROPOSED FOR
BUILDING 1 ON THE ENTITLED
SHEET A213.
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
21267 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
CUPERTINO, CA
nELATEDCOMPANIE S, LLC
••MOUTGOMERY6 TRCCT,S1J1Tt 1l00
SAW FRAIICISCO.CAi-110,I
STEINSEAO ► IA RT
!laBl,TTERYST , SlJITflOO
~FllAIIC!SC0 ,CAi41 lt
Kt1,1LEY·IIOAN
•637CIIADOTMIYE .SU ITE 300
PU;AS,,\NTON.C.-<J,,1W
"" 71!51MRKET STREET,SUITE &OO
SAN FRANCISCO. CA 5•IOJ
, ...... .__ ... ,,_.,~_ .. _,,~~ -
I --... i,,,,.-~ ,.._,_
.--,~-... 1,..,,.;o;~ - "'"":!.·
BUILDING SECTION AND
_ __ _ _ ELEVATIONS
A31
___
[J-g
ilii
-~--~·y = n=
'lflril fll~
NORTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
NOTEJ
_PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BIRO SAFETY AND DARK SKY ORDINANCE ADOPTED ev CITY OF CUPERTINO, CA,
2 ROOFRlllO(
1P.·-a-
1:Av~
10·-o·
f.O'·U- c.,
1-· ·-· "
~ .. I; :·,~.-~ .~I R
21'(1" •
~
u:.vE.i.- =
1,;•.c,•
~
I t'~'',"'7
1mn;mnr.F
78'•8" N
___ E'~~ ~
70'-6" ~
1.E.VCL~
tiO'•U ~
~
.,.,. ,,'
-I: ~ ~
;;';;'~I<
.._......_J.i,;y_CJ..2 =
16"-0"
~
J.llil. -, o·-o· l T 1
NOTE
THIS UPDATED SHEET REFLECTS
THE CHANGES PROPOSED FOR
BUILDING 1 ON THE ENTITLED
SHEETA214.
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
21267 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
CUPERTINO, CA
~•I.IOtlloc».IERYS TACCT,SUITC llOO
STEINB!lROWI RT
988'\ TTF.RVST, SUITElOO
S>.NFFWICISCO .CAi<1 111
KIMLEMlO RN
•&.:17 CHADOT CAIVE. 9UITC 300
PI.EAs.\NTON, CA ~Sa&
"'' 785 MAAl<ETSTAEET. SUITE&oo
SAN FRI\NCISCO . CAS •I0J
; ..... , _,, .. , .. '" _ , __ ., .. _ ., ....... ,
.~.;-.,._j---;-;;.;.
,--,,__, _ _;;j"Gi~~ - Cl_;-_
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
~
1.- -;.-- -- -
~"I"
,,
J
TYPICAL MEMORY CARE UNIT
~ /4"
ti~
OPEN SPACE
60SF
I I
TYPICAL lBR
$
1!'...:..!lli."
'" ffi\!J
l l/2"·
OPEN SPACE
APPROX, 60SF
TYPICAL2BR
· EO I
'
-- --j---
!·:ll 3/4"
'IS'-;\ OPEN SPACE
APPROX.!iOSF
TYPICAL STUDIO
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
21267 STEVENS CREEK 6L VD
CUPERTINO CA
AELATEDCOl.ll'AIUES . LLC
U UONt OOMtA'f GTRCCT.s u m: 1.300
s.\.N FRAUCISCO.CA~ •1(),I
STEIN&EROHART
GII SATTERV5T9UIT ElOO
SA/jFfWIC•SCO . CA!i-0111
IOMl.EY·IIOlt~
,1137CIIADOTCfW1' .SUl1"C 300
PLCAs.\.NTON. CA !MSU
"" 785MAAl<ElSTREET . SIJITE BOO
SAN FRANCISCO CAUIQ.l
........ ...... .... 1 .............. -,
TYPICAL UNIT LAYOUTS
~
BUILDING2
RETAIL
PARKING
I RESIDENTIAL
I TOWNHOUSE
PARKIN
-7
I
l
I
I
I
l ~
EV
I -
I EV
I
l ,
I
7 _ 1--I
u u
'
inst ....
~"'',
"~
'' ~- PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK
I
I
[\\
l ~t\. \
~ · .•.•; \ I
,~,.~ : q\ <:{<<>>:?: \. \
-~ --- ----.. - -,f
ARTW ORK LEGE ND:
■ OECORAT,VE PATHWAYS
■ ARTISTIC BENCHES
4 ~ I
"
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
21267 STEVENS CREEK BL VD
CUPERTINO. CA
AELATI:OCOl,IPNlle.S , U.C
Ut.lONTOOMllATSTRU'TSUIT[ llOO
SANFRAIICISCO.CAIM11M
STEll&EAOlv.Af
NB4TTERYS'l , SUlfE)OO
5,\HflWICISCO.CloM11I
IIIMLEHIOOM
""37CIIADOTDfUVE . 5UITCl00
f'l.tASAH TON, CA !MW
"" 1151MAKETSTREET.6UITESOO
SAN FRAACiSCO , CA U ! Ol
~~ ... ~ ... ,...,;_i"_ .J.._ . .!""!~
--------
FllO J[ClNO.JHIOZ.l(XI
M' ~LI
PUBLIC ARTWORK
LOCATIONS
~
::::;,,,·,,·i.·
·1•···"· ~ ..... t,::.; ·•··
i.i.-~'. •; , ,
· ....
".l, -"' . •
':-11'·
,.,(, ·- ·
, · P ., .
···::~ ~~ '
~!~~l.ll l.:rn SUNOuy I U11 ! u1 I Mi! ____ ~~ _ _ lM!1 J\_11rt/t-!ln I ~laic.'Mln ~v-~~~~~-: SEQ : ~ ~ I~ : ~~ I ~~H~ I~:~
;, ~lruQi.- 5ide-.:al k E.1!1t In: l.:l~ I&.~ O. ~ . i,] 4'1.~i G11rdun f'JLh :.d ,u:onL Le Bu:ld, nq ~. f>:t It .I.! ! !. ~. ::W G,ud,!,a P.'ll h s l"c :, , l:! J O.~ ~.:1:, :, 4 , J "1 Lo.:d.ru1 Oo:::k r e J , ',4 .! . l t> J . 119
J-:,1 n E:11. r y Drc pOf! Dr.V<0><uY r .:: I l .. lll .l,;: ;! , 76 'l , !)U Du~d::>or B . ~Lru r r: b . ~ :! . l b
P,Hk nq Lo t t10,t1 1 r e ••'" , . ~ ::t.no
r'.io'lt!,O II Ol"L!l r e _I) I J . S\l :.J. ,IJ
!ici<::WJ!k ;out h l f e j1.(,t j lll.O i tJ , l l )li,bO 11 00 , •)(J t.um!"n..:il r c !';d 1odc 1lc
:,y1nbol j TMJ
TH . srr.-i,H fl'll f,
t~:::~!1<~ r~~•~~~uT:.-
~~~! l r.\
~1; - l>uklng ?co l -, I ~i6~ l ~~-. 661,:i
~ I;~ I~:~· r:··"'• J ;; :}1, +:;'.,.,, ;~~:- -- l"H
':•t,: ' ., •. o·•
I •. ;.:., ; .. •
..,.:-{-:
' ~.; , ·:··~·-~. ~ '
' ,';. ~ • .'n
O"' ·-· .
- ... _,,_ .. ,-
.. ···--~-···- .•. :;1: : -:";
. ' ',-; ~-/ : : : . , .. / •'. ~:~ ..
. o•\ . .,,
I"
• i·i
· •·•- ,•·,,,;. . .-, .. ·.
' - •~ -" ,,••· -. · \' ..... , ••L-A..- - i•
llluminance or lum inance takulatlons are for lighting design aid purposes only. All caltulatlons performed by Horton Lees Brogden Lighting Design have been based on IESNA standards, lightlng manufacturers' data and 1100d practice. Some differences between measured values and calculated results may occur due to tolerances In calculation method s, testi ng procedure s, component performance, measurement techniques and neld conditions such as voltace and temperature variations.
Input d.ita used to generate the c.ilculatlons such ils room dimensions, rellect ances, furniture and archltec1ural elements significantly affect the llghtlng calculatlons. If the real environment conditions do not match !he Input data, differences will occur between measured values and calculated values. 7"'----..!L-. .
• 'I-',,, • •• ,_, •••
:- "!◄: • or,, ,. ,. \• , , ,. ,_ , .
. ''\.'
.... :--~~-~-~-: :·~::~>:r·;, •
, . ·.~;1 . , ... .. , ' }IL ...
. ... ; . .-::: :·: . , . .. ·•·-•
:-➔·' • :• :. :· :·: '. : O._
,\. ----=:t....,_. _..,. _ .. .
. o"
1:
'. o•
_ ... , ..
: .. -
WESTPORT
CUPERTINO
BUILDING 1
2!267 ST£VENSCRCCK BLVD
CUPERTINO. CA
Rft.A TfO COI.U'ANIES, l LC
, , UOl/fGOMEAT' BTRECT,SUfTE 1:100
SAN FRANCISCO.CAQ-110,,
STEltlllEROl tAAT
N BATTERT'ST, SUITElQO
SAHfflAIIC!SCO, Cfl,$,1111
KNL EHO~
olll37CIIAIIOTDAlvC . SIJITCXlO
PlEAs.o.NTON,CA!UW
"'' 785 MARIIElSlAE ET, SUITE&OO
5AN FRo\NCISCO.CA.U1 D3
• -,- _..,,....,,..,,..._ It"-
l'kUJlCI liQ, ~1002,100
PHOTOMETRI C
CALCULATION - SITE - -- ------ --·
LSK 1