Cupertino City Council
March 3, 2026

CC 3-3-2026
#2
No Net Loss (RHNA)
Presentation
City Council
March 3, 2026
6th Cycle Housing Element
No Net Loss

Agenda
 Background
 RHNA/Priority Sites
 No Net Loss
 Strategies
 Budget

Background

HE Adoption Timeline
May 2023 – Mar 2024
Late 2021
 HE Kick off
Feb 2023
 First Draft
submitted
to HCD
Jan – Aug 2022
 Site Selection:
 PC mtgs – six
 CC mtgs - three
Sept 2024
 HCD review
 Later drafts
to HCD
 HE Adoption –
May ’24
 HE Rezoning –
July ‘24
 HCD certifies
Housing
Element
May – Jul 2024

2021-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element
 58 individual properties on sites inventory. Many
sites contiguous.
 70% of properties (40 properties) – 50 units/acre or
more.
 15 sites – 20-35 units/acre.
 Sites divided fairly equally between Mixed-Use (27)
and Residential only zones (31).

RHNA/Sites Inventory

Income Group Units % of total
Very Low Income
(<50% of AMI)
1,193 26.0
Low Income
(50%-80% of AMI)
687 15.0
Moderate Income
(80%-120% of AMI)
755 16.5
Above Moderate Income
(>120% of AMI)
1,953 42.5
Total 4,588 100
Affordable
Units =
2,635
(~57% of
total)
City’s 6th Cycle RHNA
Buffer ~ 15-30% particularly for lower income levels recommended to ensure city does not have to update sites inventory before next HE update for “no net loss” purposes.

Approved HE Capacity and Surplus
* Includes Pipeline projects, projected units on Priority Housing Sites and projected ADUs RHNA Category Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total 2023-2031 RHNA 1,193 687 755 1,953 4,588
Total Capacity* 2,037 847 2,997 5,881
Surplus 157 92 1,044 1,294

No Net Loss (SB166)

What is No Net Loss?
 Adopted by Legislature in 2002 to ensure:
 No reduction in potential capacity of new
residential development
 Cities maintain sufficient supply of Priority Housing Sites throughout RHNA Planning period
 Amended in 2017 by SB166 to require cities to:
 Maintain sufficient capacity to meet unmet RHNA at
all times, for each income category
 Annual reporting requirements makes Housing
Element more like an agreement with ongoing
tracking than a final document

What must cities do to comply?
 If development is approved at different density
or affordability mix, City must:
 Find that existing Priority Housing sites are adequate to accommodate remaining unmet RHNA at all income levels
 Quantify remaining unmet RHNA and capacity at each
income level on existing Priority Housing Sites
 If shortfall is found, City must, concurrently or within 180 days, either:
 Identify new Housing Element sites or
 Upzone existing Housing Element sites

Why deficit?
 City has received over 15 housing development
applications since 2024
 SB330 preliminary applications locked in lower density prior to HE certification on selected Priority Housing
Sites (Summerhill I, Toll Brothers, Dividend I, SC Office Ctr.)  City BMR requirements – 15-20% vs. City affordable
RHNA – 57%
 Projects on Priority Housing Sites proposed at lowest end of density range, generally 20 units/acre (
Evulich)
 Only one project utilizing state Density Bonus law to include bonus units to exceed HE expected capacity
 Pipeline project (Vallco) utilized state law to reduce affordable units from 50% to 20% (from 890 to 356)

Current Status
 City unable to make No Net Loss finding for
Moderate units since December 2025
 Currently unable to make No Net Loss finding
for both Low and Moderate units due to
Vallco/The Rise modification
 180 days to correct inability to make No Net
Loss finding

No Net Loss Table
*Projects include:
 Summerhill I
(Fontana’s etc.);
 Toll Brothers
(United Furniture);
 Dividend Homes
I (Partial)(20111
Stevens Creek
Blvd);
 Mary Ave
(Charities Housing);
 Vallco (Rise) SB
35;
 Summerhill II
(
Evulich) (pending)
RHNA
Category Very Low Low Moderate Above
Moderate Total
2023-2031 RHNA 1,193 687 755 1,953 4,588
Total Capacity 2,037 847 2,997 5,881
Total adopted Surplus
(a) 157 92 1,044 1,294
Projection on HE/
Pipeline Sites entitled*
(b)
756 153 1,535 2,444
Actual on HE/Pipeline
Sites entitled*
(c)
272 39 1,299 1,610
Remaining Deficit/
Surplus
(a)-(b)+(c)
-327 -22 808 460

Timeline
 State requires No-Net Loss be resolved within
180 days.
 Unrealistic timeframe to identify and upzone
new sites.
 Variables affecting timeline:
 Extent of community outreach and noticing
 CEQA- level of review TBD

Strategies

Site Selection Consideration
 Identify new sites at higher densities (50 du/acre or more) along major transportation corridors
 Align with AB2011, other regional land use plans and General Plan  Keeps denser development out of neighborhoods
 Requires fewer sites
 Affordable by design (smaller apartment) units which could enable City to claim as affordable units even if not in BMR program  ISSUE: Protecting viable commercial development/retail centers along major corridors

Potential
Sites
Overview*
* Not all sites
feasible due to
location,
ownership,
control and
other factors
Budget

Budget
 Scope of Work and Budget being prepared
 Current estimate - $350K - $500K
 Cost variation since CEQA process TBD
 Options on funding being explored

CC 3-3-2026
#7
Weed Abatement
Program
Presentation
Cupertino City Council
March 3, 2026
Weed Abatement Program
Program Requirements
● Managed by Santa Clara County Department
of Agriculture
● City Code 9.08 requires property owners to
remove or destroy Vegetation and
Combustible Materials
● Compliance required yearly by April 30 and
throughout the year
● Aims to reduce fire risks and protect public
safety
Compliance & Enforcement
● Noncompliant properties added to the program
● Inspected annually for at least 3 years
● Correct violations within 2 weeks or additional
actions/costs
● Compliant properties pay only the annual
inspection fee
● Council approval necessary to authorize
County abatement
Owner Responsibilities

1. Clear Tall Grass, Weeds, and Flammable Vegetation
Full Fire Safety Standards available at: cepascc.org/fire-safety Owner Responsibilities

2. Clear Flammable Debris
Owner Responsibilities

3. Clear Overgrown Trees
Owner Responsibilities

4. Clear Dead Vegetation From Roofs
Abatement Options

1. Owner completes required work

2. County assigned contractor completes work,
charges appear on next property tax bill
County Inspections
● County inspections begin after April 30
● Every property in the program inspected
● Initial inspection fee = $296
● Fee covers County cost of servicing property
Program Fee Update
● Board of Supervisors approved new fee schedule
January 2026
● Effective June 2026
● Needed to cover operating costs
● Fewer properties and gradual decline over past 5
years
● Effective for July fee assessment hearing
Noticing to Property Owners
● January 14, County sent abatement and
public hearing notice
● February 19, City sent notice of public
hearing
Recommended Action:

1. Conduct hearing for impacted property
owners to contest the matter of proposed
abatement; and

2. Adopt Resolution No. 26-023 ordering
abatement of public nuisance from weeds or
other fire hazards pursuant to provisions of
Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 9.08 and
Resolution No. 25-101.

CC 3-3-2026
#8
Vacating a Portion of
Public Right-of-Way on
Mary Avenue
Presentation
Mary Avenue
Right-of-Way Vacation
March 3, 2026
Cupertino
City Council
Subject
Conduct a Noticed Public Hearing to Consider
Adopting a Resolution Vacating a Portion of Public
Right-of-Way Located Along the Westerly Edge of
Mary Avenue (APN 326-27-053)
Recommended Action
1) Find the project exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
2) Adopt a Resolution approving the vacation of a
portion of public right-of-way located along the
westerly edge of Mary Avenue (APN 326-27-053)
Tonight’s Action
Parcel Map & APN Map of Property

Aerial of Property
Property
• FY 21-22 City Work Program initiated Project
• 2023 Parcel was created
• 2024 Re-zoned with Housing Element
• 2/3/26 Low-income housing project approved by
City Council
• Property currently designated as Right-of-Way
• Area mostly serves parking stalls
• Underutilized parking except for festivals (9 days/year) Property Background & Status
Proposed Section of Property and Roadway

• Construction of housing project requires the Vacation • 2/10/26: General Plan Conformity by Planning Commission • Intention to Vacate was properly noticed
• Utility Companies provided consent for Vacation
• Adequate Right-of-Way remains to serve public access
and accommodate traffic
Based on these facts, Council can determine that the Right- of-Way within the Property Limits is Unnecessary for Present or Prospective Public Purposes.

It is in the Public’s Interest to Proceed to Order Vacation.

Right-of-Way Vacation
Subject
Conduct a Noticed Public Hearing to Consider
Adopting a Resolution Vacating a Portion of Public
Right-of-Way Located Along the Westerly Edge of
Mary Avenue (APN 326-27-053)
Recommended Action
1) Find the project exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
2) Adopt a Resolution approving the vacation of a
portion of public right-of-way located along the
westerly edge of Mary Avenue (APN 326-27-053)
Tonight’s Action
CC 3-3-2026
#9
Mary Avenue property
Exempt Surplus Land
Presentation
Mary Avenue
Surplus Land Act Declaration
March 3, 2026
Cupertino
City Council
Subject
Consider Adopting a Resolution Declaring the Mary
Avenue Property Located Along the Westerly Edge of
Mary Avenue (APN 326-27-053) Exempt Surplus Land
under the California Surplus Land Act
Recommended Action
1) Adopt a Resolution declaring the Mary Avenue
property located along the westerly edge of Mary
Avenue (APN 326-27-053) to be exempt surplus land
pursuant to California Government Code Section
54221(f)(1)(F)
Tonight’s Action
Parcel Map & APN Map of Property

Aerial of Property
Property
• FY 21-22 City Work Program initiated Project
• 2023 Parcel was created
• 2024 Re-zoned with Housing Element
• 2/3/26 Low-income housing project approved by
City Council, contingent upon this
decision, among other actions
• Area mostly serves as parking stalls
• Underutilized parking except for festivals (9 days/year) Property Background & Status
Proposed Section of Property and Roadway

• Gov. Code § 54221(b)(1) defines “Surplus Land” as land owned in fee simple that is not necessary for agency’s use. • “Agency’s use” includes land used, or planned to be used, for agency work or operations pursuant to a written plan adopted by the governing body (Gov. Code §
54221(b)(2); HCD Guidelines §104). The property is not
currently used for City operations and is not identified in an adopted plan for future City work and operational use
• A local agency is not required to find that land is of no public use in order to determine that it is surplus (See Airport Business Center v. City of Santa Rosa, 116
Cal.App.5
th 501(2025)
Surplus Land Act Declaration
• Pursuant to Gov. Code § 65583.2(b)(3), when a publicly owned, nonvacant site is to be included in a Housing Element, the City must describe the existing use, disclose any plans to dispose of the property during the planning period, and explain how it will comply with the Surplus Land Act.
• HCD found the City’s Housing Element in substantial compliance pursuant to Government Code § 65585, which necessarily
includes review of the site’s suitability and availability for residential development.

Accordingly, Based on (1) the site’s identification for an affordable housing project, (2) its underutilized parking condition, and (3) the City’s adopted housing policies, the Council may determine that the project site is surplus land under the Surplus Land Act Surplus Land Act Declaration Continued
Gov. Code § 54221(f)(1)(F) exempts the disposition of surplus land for a housing development in which:
• 100% of residential units are restricted to low or moderate income households
• At least 75% of units are restricted to lower income
• Affordability is secured by a recorded covenant for a minimum of 55 years
Accordingly, the Council may determine that the project qualifies as exempt surplus land under the Surplus Land Act.

Exemption to Surplus Land Act
Subject
Consider Adopting a Resolution Declaring the Mary
Avenue Property Located Along the Westerly Edge of
Mary Avenue (APN 326-27-053) Exempt Surplus Land
under the California Surplus Land Act
Recommended Action
1) Adopt a Resolution declaring the Mary Avenue
property located along the westerly edge of Mary
Avenue (APN 326-27-053) to be exempt surplus land
pursuant to California Government Code Section
54221(f)(1)(F)
Tonight’s Action
CC 3-3-2026
#10
City Manager's Mid-Year
Financial Report - REVISED
Presentation
March 3, 2026Fiscal Year 2025-26Mid-Year Financial Report 10 Year Forecast UpdateFY 2025-26 Mid-Year UpdateRecommended Mid-Year Budget AdjustmentsOther Budget ItemsRecommendations Agenda
3 4Recession scenarioSunset of Utility User Taxin November 2030,resulting in a loss ofrevenue of over $4MannuallyResumption of $2M transfersto Capital Reserve Sheriff’s Contract Scenario
FY 2025-26 Mid-Year Update
FY 2025-26 Amended Budget – By Fund($ in Millions)
General Fund Revenues – Year over Year
General Fund Expenditures – Year over Year
General Fund - Fund Balance (in millions)
Note: Q2 Year-End Projections assume budgeted revenues and expenditures are fully collected and incurred. Fund balances do not consider City Council actions after December 31, 2025.

Proposed Mid YearBudget Adjustments
Fund Balance (use of)ExpenseRevenueFund($645,138)$634,677$663,616$653,155$18,478General$131,100-$131,100Internal Service($514,038)($503,577)$663,616 $653,155$149,578Total All FundsBudget Requests by Fund Recommended Budget AdjustmentsFund Department Revenue ExpenditureChange in Fund Balance ProposalGENERAL FUND100 General Fund Administration - City Attorney's Office - 410,000 (410,000) City Attorney's Office Contract ServicesAdministration - City Attorney's Office - 10,461 (10,461)Senior Assistant City Attorney salary alignment - remainder of FY 2026100 General Fund Admin Services - 75,000 (75,000) Finance consulting, additional auditing and tax services pun group100 General Fund Innovation & Technology - 15,000 (15,000) ADA Closed Captioning 100 General Fund Parks & Recreation 18,478 15,944 2,534 Hidden Treasures Proceeds100 General Fund Public Works - 6,111 (6,111) Emergency HVAC Compressor Replacement100 General Fund Non-Departmental - 131,100 (131,100) IT PEG Transfer OutTOTAL GENERAL FUND 18,478 663,616 (645,138) 653,155 (634,677)INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS610 Innovation & Technology Innovation & Technology 131,100 - 131,100 IT PEG Transfer InTOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 131,100 - 131,100 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 149,578 663,616 (514,038) $ 653,155 $ (503,577) •Senior Assistant City Attorney Salary Alignment (Staff Recommends this request to be deferred to a future date)•Development Services Division Salary Savings for 3rd Party Inspection ServicesStaffing •As of December 31, 2025, the City Manager’s Discretionary Fund has only been used for Property Appraisal Services for 10480 Finch Avenue at a cost of $7,400•Staff will continue to report on the use of this fundCity Manager Discretionary Fund

1.Accept the City Manager’s Mid-Year Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2025-26; and 2.Adopt Resolution No. 26-XXX approving Budget Modification No. 2526-433, increasing appropriations by $663,616 653,155and revenues by $149,578 resulting in use of $514,038 503,577in one-time unassigned fund balanceRecommendations Questions?
CC 3-3-2026
#11
FY 2026-2027 CIP and
Five-year Plan
Presentation

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS
FY26-27 and 5-YEAR PLAN
City Council meeting
March 03, 2026
Tonight’s Action
Subject: Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement
Programs and Five-year Plan
Recommended Action: Receive presentation and approve
the Capital Improvement Programs Project Prioritization process and the Fiscal Year 2026–2027 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-Year Plan proposal.

For more detail on the
status of current CIP
projects, refer to the CIP
page found under Public
Works
CIP webpage
Navigation: Cupertino.gov > Your
City > Departments > Public Works
> Capital Improvement Programs
Projects
Agenda 1. FY25-26 Current Projects & Achievements

2. Prioritization Process

3. Proposed FY26-27 CIP and 5-Year Plan

4. Next Steps

1. FY25-26 Current Projects and Achievements
Project Delivery and Implementation Process

Achievements: Completed projects
City Street Lighting - LED Improvements
Jollyman All-Inclusive Playground

Senior Center Fire
Alarm System Upgrade
Bridge Preventative
Maintenance Program
Achievements: Completed projects

• Photovoltaic Project (3 sites)
• Stevens Creek Blvd Bikeway Phase 2A
• QCC Chiller replacement
• QCC Flat roof and
Sports Center roof
replacement
Achievements: [Nearly]
Completed projects
Sports Center - Photovoltaic Project
Potholing at SCB Bikeway Phase 2A
22 projects: 5 Facilities, 4 Parks & Recreation,
5 Streets & Infrastructure, 7 Bike/Ped/Transportation and 1 Sustainability FY25-26 CIP Projects - Current
ADA Improvements (Annually funded) 1
Facilities Condition Assessment
Implementation (FCA)
2 City Hall Annex 3
City Hall Improvements 4
Library Expansion Project: landscaping &
courtyard
5 Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail Plan 6
Park Amenity Improvements 7
MRP West Parking Lot Improvements (Habitat
monitoring)
8 Annual Playground Replacement 9
Outfalls Repairs 10
Stevens Creek Bridge Repair 11
McClellan Road Bridge Reconstruction 12
Street Light Installation - Annual Infill
(Annually funded)
13 Vai Avenue Outfall 14
Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV Bikeway - Phase 2B
Construction
15 Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV Bikeway - Bandley
Dr. Signal
16 Roadway Safety Improvements - High
Friction Pavement & Speed Feedback
Signage (HSIP)
17 Tamien Innu - East Segment 18
Tamien Innu - Central Segment 19
Tamien Innu - West Segment 20
School Walk Audit Implementation 21
Electric Vehicle Charging Station (EVCS)
expansion - Service Center
22 *Green = Parks *Blue = Transportation *Orange = Streets & Infrastructure *Yellow = Facilities *Magenta = Sustainability Lawrence-Mitty
Park and Trail
project
Task Project schedule
Design
Development - 60%
set
November 2025
Regulatory
permitting
December 2025
to June 2026
Construction Doc.
(95% PS&E)
July to August
2026
Bid and Permitting
(100% PS&E) Sept. to Nov. 2026
Construction Dec. 2026 to
November 2027
*A Council Informational Memo was published in July 2025.

UPDATE

2. Prioritization Process

CIP Prioritization Process
HEALTH
AND
SAFETY
LEGAL

MANDATES
ASSET

CONDITIONS

RESILIENCE &

SUSTAINABILITY

STRATEGIC

ALIGNMENT

COMMUNITY

BENEFIT

FINANCIAL

EFFECTIVENESS

PROJECT

READINESS
CIP Prioritization Process – Project Narratives

Step by Step Prioritization Process

1. Project Intake & Eligibility Screening

2. Baseline Classification – Information gathering

3. Scoring Using the CIP Prioritization Matrix

4. Scoring Review & Calibration

5. Draft CIP Ranking & Financial Constraint

6. Policy Review & Council Consideration

7. Annual Update & Continuous Improvement
CIP Prioritization Process - Steps

3. Proposed FY26-27 CIP and 5-Year Plan

3. Proposed FY26-27 CIP and 5-Year Plan
Proposed FY26-27: Additional Funding for
Existing projects – FCA project
$ 1,250,000 City Funding (FY26-27)
$ 2,946,470 City Funding (Current)
$ 417,312 External Funding
$ 4,564,421 Total
Ongoing initiative to implement projects from the prioritized recommendations of the 2017/18 “Comprehensive Facility
Condition and Use Assessment” and the “2022 Facility
Condition Assessment” (FCA) reports.
9 New projects planned for F26-27: Sports Center Locker and Shower rooms improvements (construction), 5 Misc. HVAC
equipment upgrades: Traffic Maintenance Bldg, Service
Center, BBF Pools, QCC, Community Hall, and 3 Flat Roof replacements: Monta Vista (2), Senior Center

Proposed FY26-27: Additional Funding for
Existing projects – City Hall Annex
$ 5,000,000 City Funding (FY26-27)
$ 3,025,000 City Funding (Current)
$ 8,025,000 Total
Program, plan and
build facility
improvements to
facilitate use as the
City’s EOC and an
interim workplace/
Permit Center during
City Hall renovations.

Proposed FY26-27: BBF Golf Course Pro Shop
Renovation
The Blackberry Farm Golf Course
Pro Shop serves more than 40,000
golfers annually and is central to
the visitor experience. However, the
facility has not been
comprehensively renovated in
many years and is now outdated,
inefficient, and out of alignment
with current accessibility and
building standards. This project
proposes a full renovation to
improve functionality, safety, and
customer service.
$120,000 City Funding
$0 External Funding
$120,000 Total

Proposed FY26-27: Sports Center Courts
Resurfacing
Resurfacing all tennis courts
and the Sport Court at the
Sports Center will prevent
further damage, reduce
liability, and avoid more
costly repairs in the future,
as well as maintain a
suitable and safe playing
environment.
$210,000 City Funding
$0 External Funding
$210,000 Total

Proposed FY26-27: Stevens Creek Blvd/SR 85
NB Ramp Intersection Improvements
Improvements to the NB ramp
intersection include a
separated Class IV bike lane, a
tightened right-turn on-ramp,
and traffic signal upgrades
providing protected
movements for vehicles,
bicyclists, and pedestrians. The
project will retain a civil
engineering consultant to
finalize design and obtain
necessary Caltrans approvals. $0 City Funding
$600,000 External Funding
$600,000 Total

Proposed FY26-27: Memorial Park Pickleball
Sound Attenuation
Neighboring residents have
concerns about the degradation
of the acoustic environment of
their residences. Pickleball is very
popular and generates great
community. By providing sound
attenuation to mitigate the
noise, we hope to create a
better environment for all.
$150,000 City Funding
$0 External Funding
$150,000 Total
Credit: Danny Lin via Google
Proposed FY25-26 Projects
FY26-27
Funding
EXTERNAL INTERNAL Project Description Project name
$ 1,250,000 $ 0 $ 1,250,000 Additional Funding
Implement priority projects identified
in the FCA reports.

Facilities Condition
Assessment
Implementation (FCA)
$ 5,000,000 $ 0 $ 5,000,000 Additional Funding
Renovate facility for EOC and interim
Permit Center.

City Hall Annex
$ 120,000 $0 $ 120,000 Interior renovation to improve
functionality and code compliance.

BBF Golf Course Pro Shop
Renovation
$ 210,000 $0 $ 210,000
Resurfacing the courts to provide safe
and consistent surfaces.

Sports Center Courts
Resurfacing
$ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 0 Improve traffic conditions for all users at this intersection.

SCB/SR 85 NB ramp
Intersection
improvements
$ 150,000 $ 0 $ 150,000 Provide Sound Attenuation and a reinforced fence perimeter.

Memorial Park Pickleball
Sound Attenuation
$ 7,330,000 $ 600,000 $ 6,730,000
*Green = Parks *Blue = Transportation *Orange = Streets & Infrastructure *Yellow = Facilities *Magenta = Sustainability Year 5
FY30-31
Year 4
FY29-30
Year 3
FY28-29
Year 2
FY27-28
FY26-27
Funding
Project
$ 1,300,000 $ 1,250,000 Facilities Condition Assessment Implementation (FCA
$ 5,000,000 City Hall Annex
$ 120,000 BBF Golf Course Pro Shop
Renovation
$ 210,000 Sports Center Courts Resurfacing
$ 600,000 SCB/SR 85 NB ramp Intersection
improvements
$ 150,000 Memorial Park Pickleball Sound
Attenuation
$ 125,000 $ 120,000 $ 110,000 $ 100,000 ADA Improvements $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ 600,000 Outfalls Repairs $ 1,580,150 BBF Golf Course Irrigation
Renovation
$ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 Park Shade Structures (5)
$ 1,225,000 $ 1,720,000 $ 1,990,150 $ 2,000,000 $ 7,330,000 totals *Green = Parks *Blue = Transportation *Orange = Streets & Infrastructure *Yellow = Facilities *Magenta = Sustainability Proposed CIP 5-year plan

4. Next Steps
Next Steps
• PROPOSAL DEVELOPED/STAFF & CMO REVIEWS
FY26-27 and 5-year CIP proposal developed in February 2026. Staff reviews proposal with Senior Leadership and the City Manager.
• COUNCIL – March 3
FY26-27 and 5-year CIP proposal previewed at [this] 3/03 City Council meeting. • COMMISSIONS (T.B.D.)
FY26-27 CIP proposal will be reviewed upcoming Commission meetings. • PLANNING COMMISSION (T.B.D.)
FY26-27 CIP proposal will be presented at the Planning Commission, to review for conformance to the General Plan.
• CITY COUNCIL – May/June
CIP will be proposed as part of City’s Annual Budget review Tonight’s Action
Subject: Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement
Programs and Five-year Plan
Recommended Action: Receive presentation and approve
the Capital Improvement Programs Project Prioritization process and the Fiscal Year 2026–2027 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-Year Plan proposal.

Thank You!