Cities Index.
A - City of Cupertino Single Audit Final Report

Cupertino City Council
May 19, 2026

Document
A - City of Cupertino Single Audit Final Report
Meeting
May 19, 2026
Body
Cupertino City Council
Pages
3
Original file
1.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

City of Cupertino

Cupertino, California

Single Audit and
Independent Auditor’s Reports

For the Year Ended June 30, 2025

City of Cupertino
Single Audit and Independent Auditor’s Reports
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025

Table of Contents

Page

Independent Auditor’s Reports:

Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ............................................................ 1

Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program; Report on Internal Control Over Compliance; and Report on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance .............................................................................. 3

Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards .................................................................................... ........................ 7

Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ........................................................................................ 8

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs ..................................................................................... ......................... 9

This page intentionally left blank.
6 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 1200
Santa Ana, California 92707

REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND

OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN

ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

Independent Auditor’s Report

To the Honorable Mayor and the Members of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
Cupertino, California

We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (“Government Auditing Standards”) , the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Cupertino, California (the “City”), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated December 3, 2025.

Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control over financial reporting (“internal control”) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.

A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of defi ciencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a ma terial misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or, significant deficiencies.

Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified.

To the Honorable Mayor and the Members of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
Cupertino, California

Page 2 ends

2 Report on Compliance and Other Matters

As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City’s basic financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct a nd material effect on the fina ncial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions w as not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.

Purpose of This Report

The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.

Santa Ana, California
December 3, 2025

6 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 1200
Santa Ana, California 92707

REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM; REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE; AND REPORT ON THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF

FEDERAL AWARDS REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE

Independent Auditor’s Report

To the Honorable Mayor and the Members of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
Cupertino, California

Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program

Opinion on Each Major Federal Program

We have audited the City of Cupertino, California’s (the “City”) compliance with the types of compliance requirements identified as subject to audit in the OMB Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City’s major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2025. The City’s major federal program is identified in the summary of the auditor’s results section of the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs.

In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on its major federal program for the year ended June 30, 2025.

Basis for Opinion on Each Major Federal Program

We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with a uditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAS”); the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (“ Government Auditing Standards ”), and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance").

Our responsibilities under those standards and the Uniform Guidance are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our report.

We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of City’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.

Responsibilities of Management for Compliance

Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules, and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the City’s federal programs.

To the Honorable Mayor and the Members of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
Cupertino, California

Page 2 ends

4 Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion on the City’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards , and the Uniform Guidance will always detect material noncompliance when it exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from erro r, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material, if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the City’s compliance with the requirements of each major federal program as a whole.

In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance, we

 exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.

 identify and assess the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such pro cedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding City’s compliance with th e compliance requirements referred to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.

 obtain an understanding of City’s internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of City’s internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in inte rnal control over compliance that we identified during the audit.

Report on Internal Control Over Compliance

A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose d escribed in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknes ses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance. Given these limitations, duri ng our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not identified.

To the Honorable Mayor and the Members of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
Cupertino, California

Page 3 ends

5 Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.

The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.

Report on Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance

We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activiti es, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise City’s basic financial statements. We issued our report thereon dated December 3, 2025, whic h contained unmodified opinions on thos e financial statements. Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the basic financial statements. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by the Uniform Guidance and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the b asic financial statements. The informa tion has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with GAAS.

In our opinion, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.

Santa Ana, California
March 19, 2026, except for the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, which is as of December 3, 2025

6 This page intentionally left blank.

City of Cupertino
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025

See accompanying Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. 7 Assistance G rant
Listing Identification Federal E xpenditures
Number Number E xpenditures to Subrecipients
U.S . Department of Hous i ng and Urban De vel opme nt Direct Program:

Community Development Block G rant Cluster Entitlement/Special Purpose G rants:

Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants 14.218 B24MC060057 $ 96,667 27,781$ Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants 14.218 B23MC060057 27,158 27,158 Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants 14.218 B22MC060057 32,533 68,358 Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants 14.218 B21MC060057 35,440 - Com m unity Developm ent Block G rants/Entitlem ent G rants 14.218 Program Incom e 7,942 - Total Com munity Developm ent Block G rant Cluster Entitlement/Special Purpose G rants 199,740 123,297
Total U.S . Department of Hous i ng and Urban Devel opment 199,740 123,297 U.S. Department of Transportation
Passed through State of California Department of Transportation:

Highway Planning and Construction (Federal-Aid Highway Program) 20.205 BPMP-5318(029) 1,444,881 - Highway Planning and Construction (Federal-Aid Highway Program) 20.205 CML-5318 (033) 43,995 - Highway Planning and Construction (Federal-Aid Highway Program) 20.205 BRLS-5318 (037) 16,464 - Highway Planning and Construction (Federal-Aid Highway Program) 20.205 CML-5318 (036) 7,072 - Total Highway Planning and Construction 1,512,412 - Total U.S. Department of Transportation 1,512,412 - U .S. Department of E nergy
Direct Program:

Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program (EECBG) 81.128 IA-0000000811 123,899 - Total U .S. Department of E nergy 123,899 - U .S. Department of Health and Human Serv ices
Passed through National Association of County and City Health Officials:

Medical Reserve Corps Small Grant Program 93.008 MRC RISE 22-0039 1,176 - Total U .S. Department of Health and Human Serv ices 1,176 - Total E xpenditures of Federal Aw ards 1,837,227$ 123,297 $ Federal Grantor/Pass - Through
Grantor/Program Title

City of Cupertino
Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards For the Year Ended June 30, 2025

8 Note 1 – Reporting Entity

The financial reporting entity, as defined by the Governmental Accounting Standard Board (“GASB”), consists of the primary government, which is the City of Cupertino, Calif ornia (the “City”), organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and other organizations for which th e nature and significance of their relationship with the primary government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity’s financial statements to be misleading or incomplete.

The City Council acts as the governing body and is able to impose its will on the following organization, establishing financial accountability: The Cupertino Public Facilities Corporation.

Note 2 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awar ds (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of the City under programs of the federal government for th e year ended June 30, 2025. Federal financial assistance received directly from federal agencies, as well as federa l financial assistance passed through the State of California Department of Transportation, and Nati onal Association of County and City H ealth Officials, are included in the Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the “Uniform Guidance”). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position of the City.

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles containe d in the Uniform Guidance, wherein cer tain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.

Note 4 – Indirect Cost Rate

The City has not elected to use the de minimis indirect rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance (10 percent of modified total direct costs for awards issued prior to Oc tober 1, 2024 and 15 percent for awards issued or amended on or after October 1, 2024).

Note 5 – Subrecipients

During the year ended June 30, 2025, the City provided federal funds to the following subrecipients:

Assistance Amount Provided
Listing Number Program Name / Subrecipient Name to Subrecipients

14.218 Community Development Block Grant Cluster Entitlement/Special Purpose Grants:

Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley 96,238 $
West Valley Community Services 17,774
Live Oak Adult Day Services 9,285
123,297$

City of Cupertino
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025

9 Section I – Summary of Auditor’s Results

Financial Statements

Type of report the auditor issued on whether the financial statements audited were prepared in accordance with GAAP: Unmodified

Internal control over financial reporting:

 Material weakness(es) identified? No

 Significant deficiency(ies) identified? None reported

Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? No

Federal Awards

Internal control over major programs:

 Material weakness(es) identified? No

 Significant deficiency(ies) identified? None reported

Type of auditor’s report issued on compliance for major programs Unmodified

Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(a)? No

Identification of major programs:

Assistance Listing Number(s) Name of Federal Program or Cluster Expenditures

20.205 Highway Planning and Construction 1,512,412 $
Total E xpenditures of All Major Federal Programs 1,512,412$ Total E xpenditures of Federal Awards 1,837,227$
Percentage of Total Expenditures of Federal Awards 82.32%

Dollar threshold used to distinguish between type A and type B programs $750,000

Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee in accordance with 2 CFR 200.520? No

City of Cupertino
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025

10 Section II – Financial Statement Findings

A. Current Year Findings – Financial Statement Audit

No current year financial statement findings were noted.

B. Prior Year Findings – Financial Statement Audit

No prior year financial statement findings were noted.

City of Cupertino
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025

11 Section III – Federal Award Findings

A. Current Year Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Award Program Audit

No current year federal award findings were noted.

B. Prior Year Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Award Program Audit

2024-001 – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment – Internal Control over Procurement and Verification Against the System for Award Management (“SAM”) (Significant Deficiency)

Identification of the Federal Program:

Assistance Listing Number: 20.205
Assistance Listing Title: Highway Planning and Construction Federal Agency: Department of Transportation
Pass-Through Entity: State of California Department of Transportation Federal Award Number and Award Year: CML-5318(033)

Condition:

During our audit, we noted that the City did not have documentation on verifying the vendors against the SAM to ensure that they were not suspended or debarred from federally funded purchases.

Recommendation:

We recommended that the City to establish internal c ontrol procedures to monitor compliance requirements to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred from federally-funded purchases.

Status:

This finding was resolved during the year ended June 30, 2025.

City of Cupertino
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025

12 Section III – Federal Award Findings (Continued)

B. Prior Year Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Award Program Audit (Continued)

2024-002 – Special Tests and Provisions – Internal Co ntrol over Quality Assurance Program (Significant Deficiency)

Identification of the Federal Program:

Assistance Listing Number: 20.205
Assistance Listing Title: Highway Planning and Construction Federal Agency: Department of Transportation
Pass-Through Entity: State of California Department of Transportation Federal Award Number and Award Year: CML-5318(033)

Condition:

Quality Assurance Tests were performed during the fiscal year for the federal project; however, we found that the corresponding monitoring forms and checklists were not completed in a timely manner in accordance with the adopted QAP Manual. The Appendices K, E, and L checklists were all accomplished af ter the project completion which deviates from the intended purpose of the QAP.

Recommendation:

We recommended that the City to adhere with th e QAP manual on the timely accomplishment of the above mentioned forms and checklists in line with the federal project timeline.

Status:

This finding was resolved during the year ended June 30, 2025.

← All documents from this meeting