J - FY 2026-27 Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Book (Draft)

Draft - June 16, 2026

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Roger Lee, Director

CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE ~ CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3266
(408) 777-3354 ~ FAX (408) 777-3333
CUPERTINO.ORG

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS
FY 2026-2027
Chad Mosley, Director
FY 26-27 CIP BOOK Page i

Capital Improvement Programs Fiscal Year 2026 – 2027
and 5-Year Plan

Table of Contents

Section Page #

1. Introduction Letter 1

2. Program Summary 4
A. Mission Statement 4
B. Background Information 4
C. Capital Improvement Program Development Process 4

1. Process Overview 5

2. Timeline 6
D. Project Priorities 7

1. Guiding Principles 7

2. Prioritization Process 7
E. Project Categories 8
F. GAAP Statement 9
G. Capital Budgeting Process 9
H. Funding Sources 9
I. Technological Innovations 10
J. Debt Issuance 12

3. New Projects, Additional Funding, and Five-Year Plan 13 A. FY 26 -27 New Projects and Additional Funding 13
B. Five -Year Plan 16
C. City Hall Improvements Project 18

4. Program Status Report 19
A. Overview 19
B. Achievements – Completed Projects 19
C. Current Projects 21

1. Facilities Projects 22

2. Parks and Recreation Projects 27

3. Streets and Infrastructure Projects 30

4. Transportation Projects 34

5. Sustainability and Energy Projects 38
D. Summary 39

5. Project Narratives 43
A. New Projects 44
B. Current Projects 55

FY 26-27 CIP BOOK Page ii

1. Facilities Projects 56

2. Parks and Recreation Projects 67

3. Streets and Infrastructure Projects 76

4. Transportation Projects 87

5. Sustainability and Energy Projects 104
C. Completed Projects 109

6. Glossary 113

7. Index 116

8. Appendix 118
A- CIP Policy 118
B – Fund Types 124
C – CIP Prioritization Process 127
D – FY 26-27 CIP Prioritization Matrix 136

Capital Improvement Programs Fiscal Year 2026 – 2027 and 5-Year Plan

July 1, 2026 (June 16, 2026 Draft)

Introduction

Honorable Mayor and members of the City Council:

We are pleased to present the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which outlines the planning, funding, and delivery of infrastructure investments that support Cupertino’s service delivery and long-term community priorities. This document provides a comprehensive overview of both active and new projects and reflects the City’s continued commitment to maintaining critical infrastructure in a fiscally responsible manner.

The Fiscal Year (FY) 2026–2027 CIP was developed in coordination with the City’s broader budget strategy and aligns with the City Council’s Strategic Vision and Work Program. As with the operating budget, this year’s CIP reflects a disciplined approach to resource allocation amid ongoing financial uncertainty. The City continues to balance infrastructure needs with its commitment to maintaining strong reserves and delivering essential services.

In recent years, the City has faced a range of fiscal challenges, including rising costs and increased demands on the General Fund. As noted in the City Manager’s budget message, the proposed increases to the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s contract represent significant and ongoing financial pressure. These constraints directly influenced the scope and pacing of the CIP, requiring a continued focus on core infrastructure and essential capital needs.

Historically, the City has relied on General Fund transfers to the Capital Reserve to support long-term infrastructure investments. Over the past five fiscal years, these contributions have varied due to broader budget conditions:
• FY 26–27: $2,000,000
• FY 25–26: $2,000,000
• FY 24–25: $0
• FY 23–24: $0
FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 2
• FY 22–23: $2,500,000

For FY 26–27, the CIP includes a total of $2,000,000 in General Fund support, reflecting the City’s continued caution regarding capital spending amid ongoing fiscal uncertainty. In addition, $600,000 in Developer In-Lieu Fees is included as part of the CIP to support eligible improvements. Consistent with prior Council direction, $4,730,000 will be transferred from the Capital Reserve to complete construction of the City Hall Annex/Emergency Operations Center (EOC) project at 10455 Torre Avenue. While the General Fund contribution remains modest, reinforcing the City’s disciplined financial posture, the use of the Capital Reserve demonstrates the City’s and Council’s commitment to advancing priority civic infrastructure. This approach is consistent with longer-term planning assumptions, which currently contemplate a potential future investment of approximately $55 million from the Future Use Fund to address the renovation or replacement of the structurally deficient City Hall facility.

The CIP continues to be funded through a combination of City revenues and external sources, including grants and dedicated funds. Because many projects span multiple years, funding is carried forward until project completion. Upon completion, any remaining balances are returned to their original funding source or to the Capital Reserve, reinforcing the City’s commitment to prudent financial stewardship.

To further strengthen the CIP, the City enhanced its project prioritization process for FY 26– 27 by formalizing a process framework supported by objective scoring criteria. This updated approach is designed to ensure that capital investments are evaluated and ranked in a transparent, consistent, and defensible manner across all departments. Collectively, these criteria balance critical considerations such as safety, regulatory compliance, fiscal responsibility, community impact, and alignment with City Council priorities. The resultant scoring matrix promotes a balanced consideration of the projects as part of the annual program evaluation. While this process provides a prioritized ranking of projects, it does not preclude the City from advancing other projects that it determines are necessary. The enhanced framework also remains flexible, allowing the City to adapt to evolving conditions while improving its ability to make informed, data-driven capital planning decisions.

Consistent with the City’s overall budget strategy, the CIP reflects a continued “back to basics” approach. Investment is prioritized toward maintaining and rehabilitating existing public assets, improving safety, and supporting essential services. Projects that introduce new amenities or require ongoing operational funding were carefully evaluated and, in many cases, deferred in order to preserve long-term fiscal sustainability.

While the City’s financial position remains stable, continued cost pressures and economic uncertainty will require ongoing caution in the near term. As a result, the CIP is expected to maintain its current focus on core infrastructure for the foreseeable future, with future expansion dependent on improvements in the City’s fiscal outlook.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 3

The CIP represents a collective effort across departments and reflects the dedication of City staff to maintain and enhance Cupertino’s infrastructure systems. Through careful planning, coordination, and financial management, the City will continue to deliver capital projects that support a safe, functional, and resilient community.

In summary, the FY 26–27 Capital Improvement Program reflects the City’s continued commitment to disciplined financial management and strategic investment in core infrastructure. In light of ongoing fiscal pressures and uncertainty, the City will continue to emphasize a “back to basics” approach over the next five years, prioritizing essential repairs, lifecycle maintenance, and improvements to existing assets. At the same time, targeted investments, such as the City Hall Annex/EOC project, demonstrate the City’s commitment to advancing critical civic infrastructure and planning for long-term needs. The enhanced prioritization framework further strengthens the City’s ability to allocate limited resources in a transparent and data-driven manner. While the CIP will remain focused on foundational services for the foreseeable future, the City will continue to evaluate opportunities to expand the program as financial conditions improve and resources allow.

Respectfully submitted,

Chad Mosley
Director of Public Works
Susan Michael
Capital Improvement Programs Manager

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 4
Capital Improvement Programs Fiscal Year 2026 – 2027
and 5-Year Plan

Program Summary

Mission Statement
The City of Cupertino’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) strategically plans and delivers infrastructure investments that maintain public assets, support community priorities, and ensure long-term fiscal sustainability, providing safe, reliable, and resilient infrastructure for current and future residents.

Background Information
A capital improvement project is defined as a project that enhances, restores, or extends the useful life of a physical asset, or adapts it for a new or different use. The CIP Division within the Department of Public Works is responsible for the planning, design, procurement, and construction management of all CIP projects. These projects encompass a wide range of public infrastructure, including streets, sidewalks, storm drainage systems, buildings, parks, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The division ensures that all public improvements are delivered in alignment with community expectations and in compliance with City and State of California regulations. Protecting public health and safety remains the highest priority in the planning and execution of all CIP projects.

The City undertakes various types of projects, and not all capital-related work is included in the CIP. What distinguishes a CIP project from maintenance efforts, Special Projects, or City Work Program (CWP) initiatives is the requirement for professional design services. These services typically involve specialized expertise, technical analysis, and formal documentation. Routine maintenance tasks—such as street resurfacing or sidewalk patching—are not considered CIP projects and are instead funded and managed through the City’s Operations Budget.

While most CIP projects focus on the design and construction of public infrastructure, some may involve preliminary planning efforts—such as feasibility studies or other technical assessments—that also require design and engineering input. In such cases, these planning- related efforts may be classified as CIP projects. These general guidelines vary depending on the specifics of each project.

Capital Improvement Program Development Process
The City of Cupertino’s CIP is developed through a structured, collaborative process that includes department input, technical evaluation, prioritization, and policy direction. This process ensures that capital investments are strategically planned, fiscally responsible, and aligned with the City’s long-term goals and community priorities.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 5
The CIP functions as a multi-year planning tool, identifying and funding infrastructure projects while balancing available resources with service demands and asset needs.

Process Overview
The Capital Program Development Process consists of the following key phases:

1. Project Identification and Department Input

2. Staff Review and Technical Evaluation

3. Project Prioritization and Funding Alignment

4. City Manager Review and Recommended CIP

5. Commission Review and Public Input

6. Planning Commission Review (General Plan Consistency)

7. City Council Review and Adoption
This framework reflects best practices for capital planning, including the use of defined project lists, cost estimates, prioritization criteria, and multi-year funding strategies.

Project Identification and Department Input
City departments identify and submit capital project requests based on:
• Asset condition and lifecycle needs
• Operational and service level requirements
• Regulatory or safety mandates
• Community input and emerging priorities
• Adopted master plans and Council direction
Each request includes scope, schedule, cost estimates, and justification, ensuring a comprehensive inventory of capital needs.

Staff Review and Technical Evaluation
Public Works staff review all submitted projects to:
• Confirm eligibility and refine project scope
• Validate cost estimates and schedules
• Evaluate feasibility and coordination with other projects • Identify potential funding sources and constraints
• Assess operating and maintenance impacts
• Ensure projects align with City Master Plans and the General Plan This step ensures that projects are well-defined, implementable, and consistent with City standards and financial policies.

Project Prioritization and Funding Alignment
Projects are then evaluated using a criteria-based framework to determine relative priority and funding readiness. (See
Project Priorities section below for detailed
methodology.) Projects are then aligned with available and projected funding sources across the multi-year CIP, ensuring a balanced and fiscally sustainable program.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 6
City Manager Review and Recommended CIP
The City Manager reviews the prioritized list of capital projects and proposed funding plan to ensure alignment with Citywide goals, financial policies, and available resources. This step balances competing needs across departments, considering both near-term infrastructure priorities and long-term fiscal sustainability. Adjustments may be made to project timing, scope, or funding to reflect policy direction and budget constraints. The outcome of this review is a Recommended CIP, which serves as the basis for Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council consideration.

Commission Review and Public Input
Following staff evaluation, projects are presented to applicable City commissions based on subject matter, such as transportation, parks, and sustainability. Commissions provide advisory input on project scope, priorities, and potential community impacts, helping to refine projects and ensure alignment with community values and adopted policies. This step enhances transparency and incorporates public perspectives early in the process.

Planning Commission Review (General Plan Consistency)
The Planning Commission reviews the proposed CIP to determine consistency with the City’s General Plan, as required by State law. This review ensures that planned capital investments support the City’s long-range land use, mobility, infrastructure, and environmental goals. The Commission provides a formal finding of consistency prior to final consideration by the City Council.

City Council Review and Adoption
The City Council reviews the Recommended CIP through public hearings as part of the annual budget process. The Council may modify project priorities, funding allocations, or schedules based on policy direction and community input. Upon adoption, the first year of the CIP becomes the City’s approved Capital Improvement Program Budget, while subsequent years serve as a planning framework to guide future investment decisions and are updated annually.

Timeline
The CIP is prepared annually in coordination with the City’s budget cycle:
• Fall/Winter: Department submissions and initial review • Winter/Spring: Staff evaluation, prioritization, and funding analysis • Spring: Preparation of Recommended CIP and Commission review • Late Spring: Planning Commission finding of General Plan Consistency and City Council review
• June: CIP adoption with the annual budget

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 7
Project Priorities
The CIP prioritization process is designed to help the City of Cupertino transparently, consistently, and defensibly rank capital projects across departments. The framework balances safety, regulatory compliance, fiscal responsibility, community benefit, and City Council strategic priorities, while remaining flexible enough to adapt to changing conditions.

Guiding Principles:

The prioritization process should be:
• Transparent - Provide clear criteria and scoring that can be explained to decision makers and the Public.
• Equitable – Considers community-wide benefit and underserved populations • Data Driven – Based on measurable impacts where possible • Strategically Aligned – Supports adopted plans, policies, and Council goals • Financially Responsible – Accounts for lifecycle cost and funding availability

Prioritization Process
To further strengthen the CIP, the City has enhanced its program development by formalizing the CIP Prioritization Process, which includes a framework supported by objective scoring criteria. This updated approach is designed to ensure that capital investments are evaluated and ranked in a transparent, consistent, and defensible manner across all departments. The framework incorporates weighted prioritization categories as follows:
• Health and Safety (30%)
• Regulatory and Legal Mandates (15%)
• Asset Condition and Infrastructure Risk (15%)
• Climate Resilience and Sustainability (5%)
• Strategic Alignment (10%)
• Community Benefit and Equity (5%)
• Financial Leverage and Cost Effectiveness (15%)
• Project Readiness and Deliverability (5%)

The highest priority is given to projects that address public health and safety and to protect public and private property.

Staff evaluates and prioritizes new project proposals based on the factors listed above. The highest priority is given to projects that address public health and safety and that protect public and private property. Other factors, including available funding and resources to complete the project, are then considered within the context of other City goals.

A matrix of proposed CIP projects is developed using the criteria and factors listed. After the matrix is developed and adjusted, it is further evaluated within the context of current budget and staffing resources. This matrix is shared with Council and the Community, prior FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 8
to budget discussions, as a communication tool to facilitate the broader conversation of which projects are appropriate and required for the next fiscal year’s CIP.

Proposed and existing projects are reviewed in the context of fiscal responsibility and capacity to confirm that initiating and/or continuing the project is the best course of action.

All existing projects are also re-reviewed annually for prioritization.

As a result of this years annual review of existing projects, the City recommended that all existing projects be retained with their current level of funding.

Project Categories
The City of Cupertino’s CIP organizes projects into defined Project Categories to ensure consistency in planning, prioritization, and reporting. Grouping projects by asset category improves transparency, supports data-driven decision-making, and aligns investments with the City’s infrastructure systems and community priorities. The Project Categories reflect industry best practices and are consistent with the asset-based categories commonly used in municipal capital programs, including facilities, transportation, utilities, and equipment.

Facilities
Facilities projects include the construction, expansion, renovation, and major maintenance of City-owned buildings and structures. These projects ensure that public facilities remain safe, functional, and responsive to community needs.

Examples include:
• Civic buildings (City Hall, Service Center)
• Library and community facilities
• Major building system replacements (HVAC, roofing, accessibility upgrades, fire alarms)

Parks and Recreation
Parks and Recreation projects enhance and maintain the City’s parks, open space, and recreational amenities, supporting community health and quality of life.

Examples include:
• Park development and renovation
• Playgrounds, sports courts, and fields
• Pathways, landscaping, and irrigation systems
• Park amenity improvements and accessibility upgrades

Transportation
Transportation projects improve the safety, efficiency, and connectivity of the City’s multimodal transportation network.

Examples include:
• Bicycle and pedestrian facilities (bike lanes, sidewalks, trails) • Traffic signals and intelligent transportation systems • Roadway safety improvements and corridor enhancements FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 9
• Traffic calming projects

Streets and Infrastructure
Streets and Infrastructure projects focus on maintaining and improving the City’s core infrastructure systems, including roadway surfaces and stormwater conveyance systems.

Examples include:
• Bridge and structural improvements
• Storm drain systems, culverts, and outfalls
• Flood mitigation and drainage system upgrades

Sustainability and Energy
Sustainability and Energy projects support the City’s environmental goals and reduce long-term operational costs through energy efficiency and climate resilience.

Examples include:
• Renewable energy systems (e.g., photovoltaic installations) • Electric vehicle charging infrastructure
• Energy-efficient facility upgrades (LED lighting, building systems) • Climate adaptation and resilience improvements

GAAP Statement
The City prepares the CIP separately from the annual Operating Budget to provide a more detailed description of the City’s infrastructure needs, capital priorities, funding sources, and planned improvements. This CIP uses accounting methods consistent with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in the United States of America, as established by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), and follows standards established by the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO).

Capital Budgeting Process
Key capital revenue estimates are based on historical trends, current year actual revenues, adopted fee schedules, grant award notifications, and discussions with funding agencies.

Estimates for recurring revenues are projected using recent collections and anticipated economic conditions, while grant revenues are included when funding has been awarded or is reasonably expected to be received. Capital projects are budgeted on a project-by-project basis, and appropriations approved by the City Council remain in effect until the project is completed or formally closed.

Funding Sources
Cupertino’s CIP is funded through a combination of local revenues, restricted special revenues, reserves, developer-related fees, and external grant funds. Funding is matched to the purpose and eligibility of each project so that limited discretionary resources can be focused on the City’s highest organizational priorities. Consistent with the City’s current strategic direction, the CIP emphasizes fiscal resilience, protection of public health and safety, preservation of existing infrastructure, emergency preparedness, mobility and FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 10
transportation safety, parks and recreation asset stewardship, and sustainability investments that reduce long-term operating costs.The list below describes the primary sources of funding for the CIP. Refer to Appendix B – Fund Types for additional information.

• General Fund and Capital Reserve: These are the City’s most flexible local sources and are used primarily for core infrastructure needs, facility rehabilitation, emergency preparedness projects, and other high-priority capital investments where no dedicated outside funding is available. Their use reflects the City’s emphasis on fiscal discipline, asset preservation, and advancing essential civic infrastructure. • Developer Fees and In-Lieu Contributions: Developer-related revenues, including eligible in-lieu or impact fee proceeds, help fund improvements needed to support growth and offset development impacts. These sources are typically directed toward transportation, park, and other infrastructure improvements consistent with the legal restrictions of the fee program and the City’s goal of aligning growth with infrastructure capacity.
• Transportation Special Revenues: Restricted transportation revenues—such as gas tax and road maintenance funds, transportation sales tax allocations, and other formula-based sources—support street rehabilitation, pavement preservation, traffic safety, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, and related mobility projects. These funds help advance the City’s priorities for public safety, system reliability, and multimodal connectivity.
• Grant Funding: Federal, State, regional, and county grants are an important source of leverage for eligible projects, particularly for transportation safety, active transportation, sustainability, and resilience improvements. The City actively pursues grant opportunities to stretch local dollars, accelerate priority projects, and improve overall cost effectiveness.
• Dedicated and Restricted Funds: Certain projects may also be supported by dedicated revenues or special-purpose funds that can only be used for specific capital purposes. These sources are applied where eligible to ensure compliance with funding restrictions while supporting the City’s broader infrastructure and service objectives.

By using the most appropriate funding source for each project, the City can maintain a balanced and sustainable CIP over multiple years. This funding approach supports Cupertino’s organizational priorities by directing flexible resources to the most critical needs, maximizing external funding where available, and reinforcing a “back to basics” capital strategy centered on safety, infrastructure reliability, responsible stewardship of public assets, and long-term financial sustainability.

Technological Innovations
The City of Cupertino utilizes current computer technologies and data-driven tools in the development, analysis, and production of its CIP. These tools enhance coordination across departments and improve data accuracy throughout the capital planning process.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 11

Document Development and Production
The CIP document is developed using standardized templates, spreadsheet-based models and planning tools, and document management tools that support consistency, efficiency, and collaboration. These tools allow for the integration of project data, financial information, and narrative content, ensuring the CIP remains accurate, accessible, and regularly updated.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
GIS data is used to support capital planning and project coordination. GIS mapping enables staff to:
• Identify project locations and infrastructure systems • Evaluate spatial relationships and service gaps
Maps included in the CIP are developed using GIS data layers such as streets, facilities, parks, and storm drainage systems, providing a clear and visual representation of the City’s capital investments.

Budget Development and Financial Tools
The City utilizes its municipal financial system, along with spreadsheet-based models and planning tools, to develop the CIP and Capital Budget. These tools support:
• Multi-year revenue and expenditure forecasting
• Evaluation of funding sources, including General Fund, grants, and developer fees • Analysis of project costs, timing, and cash flow
• Assessment of long-term fiscal impacts
The integration of the CIP with the City’s financial system ensures consistency between the capital program and the annual operating budget, supporting sound financial planning and reporting.

Data-Driven Analysis and Asset Management
Cupertino applies data-driven tools to identify infrastructure needs and inform project prioritization. These include:
• Infrastructure condition assessments to identify building repair and replacement needs
• Asset tracking and lifecycle analysis to evaluate infrastructure performance over time
These tools support objective, evidence-based decision making and help ensure that capital investments are prioritized based on risk, condition, and service impact.

//
FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 12
Debt Issuance
The City currently maintains debt obligations related to Certificates of Participation issued for City Hall, Community Hall, and the Library. The City is expected to complete these debt payments by FY 29–30 and will continue to pay approximately $2.7 million annually in principal and interest until that time. These payments are funded through transfers from the General Fund to the Debt Service Funds. While the City maintains these existing debt obligations, no current or new Capital Improvement Program projects included in this document will be debt-funded.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 13
Capital Improvement Programs Fiscal Year 2026 – 2027
and 5-Year Plan

New Projects, Additional Funding, and Five-Year Plan

FY 26 -27 New Projects and Additional Funding
The Fiscal Year (FY) 26–27 CIP adds five new projects and additional funding for two existing projects as part of the FY 26-27 budget year. Identified through the City’s annual capital planning and prioritization process, these additions to the program reflect the City’s continued “back to basics” approach to infrastructure investment, while continuing to address high-priority infrastructure needs, maintain momentum on active projects, and advance select new investments that align with available funding, project readiness, and City organizational priorities. The sections that follow provide a summary of the recommended scope, funding, and rationale for each project.

TABLE - NEW & ADDITIONALLY FUNDED CIP PROJECTS
Project name Project Description FY 26 -27
Funding

INTERNAL
Funding

EXTERNAL
Funding
BBF Golf Course
Pro Shop
Renovation
Interior renovation to improve
functionality and code
compliance.
120,000 120,000 0
Blesch Property
Improvements
Demolition of the existing
residential building, replace with
minimal grading, natural habitat
and modest pathway[s].

TBD TBD TBD
Memorial Park
Pickleball Sound
Attenuation
Provide sound attenuation and a
new structurally reinforced
fence.
150,000 150,000 0
Sports Center
Courts
Resurfacing
Resurfacing the courts to
provide safe and consistent
surfaces.
210,000 210,000 0
SCB/SR 85 NB
ramp Intersection
improvements
Improve traffic conditions for all
users at this intersection.

Developer In-Lieu fees funded.
600,000 0 600,000
City Hall Annex *Additional Funding for existing
project.

Renovation of 10455 Torre
Avenue site to include the City’s
Emergency Operations Center
(EOC), and workplace for use as
interim City Hall.
5,000,000 5,000,000 0

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 14
Facilities
Condition
Assessment
Implementation
(FCA)
*Additional Funding for existing
project.

Implement priority
recommendations identified in
the Facility Condition
Assessment reports.
1,250,000 1,250,000 0

subtotal 7, 330 ,000 6, 730 ,000 600,000
Table Note: Green ﬁeld indicates Parks and Recreation category projects, gold ﬁeld indicates Facilities projects, blue ﬁeld represents Transportation category projects, orange ﬁeld indicates Streets and Infrastructure projects, and magenta ﬁeld indicates Sustainability and Energy category projects.

BBF Golf Course Pro Shop Renovation
The Blackberry Farm Golf Course Pro Shop serves more than 40,000 golfers annually and is central to the visitor experience. However, the facility has not been comprehensively renovated in many years and is now outdated, inefficient, and out of alignment with current accessibility and building standards. This project proposes a full renovation to improve functionality, safety, and customer service. The upgrades will address deferred maintenance, reduce operational and safety risks, and ensure the pro shop reflects the level of service and accessibility expected of a City-owned facility.

Blesch Property Improvements
The Blesch property is an approximately 28,000 square foot parcel, currently developed with a single-family residence. While the structure has been used for auxiliary City purposes since acquisition, it is not suitable for use as a public facility. Significant repairs, accessibility improvements and reconfiguration would be required for any public use. Additionally, the site is located within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zone AE, with more than half of the property situated within the designated floodway. Being in a FEMA designated floodplain results in constraints which substantially limit the feasibility of maintaining or constructing vertical structures on the site and impose additional regulatory requirements, review timelines, and costs for any building construction. This project proposes to demolish the existing residential building and infill the site with low-level native plantings and modest pathways.

Public Works will analyze the project based on the direction provided by City Council and will return to City Council with a cost estimate for a budget request to begin the project in earnest.

Memorial Park Pickleball Sound Attenuation
Adjacent to the pickleball courts within Memorial Park, neighboring residents have concerns about the degradation of the acoustic environment of their residences. Pickleball is very popular and generates great community. By providing sound attenuation to mitigate the noise, we hope to create a better environment for all. After an initial acoustical analysis, this project will provide sound attenuation measures at the Memorial Park Pickleball courts.

The installation of the sound panels will require a new structurally-reinforced fence.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 15

Sports Center Courts Resurfacing
The tennis court surfaces have deteriorated due to extended use and weather exposure and are now beyond their typical five- to seven-year lifespan (last resurfaced in 2016).

Resurfacing will prevent further damage, reduce liability, and avoid more costly repairs in the future. This project will resurface all courts at the Sports Center to maintain a suitable and safe playing environment.

SCB/SR 85 NB ramp Intersection improvements
At the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and SR 85’s northbound ramp, the existing high-speed on-ramp creates safety risks for bicyclists and pedestrians. The improvements include a tighter ramp turn, dedicated signal phasing, a separated bike lane, and a protected pedestrian crossing to significantly improve safety. These improvements were required as part of the Westport development, but Caltrans Permitting delays prevented their completion, leading the City to collect in-lieu funds to complete the project. The project now requires final design completion and Caltrans permit approval before proceeding.

The project includes design, construction, and project management for improvements at the intersection. Improvements include a separated Class IV bike lane, a tightened right-turn on-ramp, and traffic signal upgrades providing protected movements for vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The project will retain a civil engineering consultant to finalize design and obtain necessary Caltrans approvals.

City Hall Annex: Additional Funding
The proximity of this property to the Civic Center, and its central location within the City, lends itself to numerous uses, including a satellite and/or interim City Hall facility. Overall, the project scope includes programming, planning and building facility improvements to facilitate short-term and long-term use[s] of the building. Emergency Operations Center (EOC) program and requirements were added to the scope of this project in late 2022.

The $5,000,000 in additional funds will enable the design and construction to proceed in line with the projected costs of the project. Public Works will return to City Council once construction bids are received, to award the project.

Facilities Condition Assessment (FCA) Implementation: Additional Funding The 2017/18 FCA report and the 2022 FCA report assessed the condition of nearly every City-owned facility. Several projects were identified as high priority facilities with significant deficiencies that need to be addressed to avoid costly repairs and extended service interruptions. This ongoing initiative to implement projects from the prioritized recommendations of the reports addresses all but one of the the Priority One projects listed.

The remaining project is planned to be part of FY 27-28 CIP proposal. Refer to the “Program Status Report”section of this document, for additional information on the FY 26-27 projects planned.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 16
Fiscal Impact
The FY 26-27 CIP’s new and annually funded projects require an allocation of $6,730,000 from Capital Reserve and General Fund, and $600,000 from Developer In-Lieu fees previously collected. The annual transfer from the General Fund is planned at $2,000,000.

The remaining $4,730,000 can be accommodated by the Capital Reserve.

TABLE – FISCAL IMPACT FY 26-27 CIP FUNDING
Fund/Description Amount
FY 26 -27 CIP New & Additionally funded
projects
$7,330,000
FY 26-27 Developer In-Lieu funds ($600,000)
City Funds required $6,730,000
General Fund Annual Transfer to CIP ($2,000,000)
Capital Reserve Required $4,730,000

Capital Reserve Accounting Amount
Capital Reserve (2/21/26) $10,243,497
Capital Reserve Required $4,730,000
Required Minimum Reserve maintained $5,000,000
Capital Reserve Available (beyond min.) $513,497

Five-Year Plan
Building upon the five-year plans of previous years, as well as input from stakeholders, the updated five-year CIP plan is included below.

TABLE - FY 26-27 CIP FIVE-YEAR PLAN
Projec t FY 26 -27
Funding
Year 2
FY 27-28
Projected
Cost
Year 3
FY 28-29
Projected
Cost
Year 4
FY 29-30
Projected
Cost
Year 5
FY 30-31
Projected
Cost
City Hall Annex
(Additional Funding)
5,000,000
FCA Implementation
(Additional Funding)
1,250,000 1,300,000

BBF Golf Course Pro
Shop Renovation
120,000
Blesch Property
Improvements
TBD
Memorial Park
Pickleball Sound
Attenuation
150,000
Sports Center Courts
Resurfacing
210,000
FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 17
SCB/SR 85 NB ramp
Intersection
improvements
600,000
ADA Improvements
(Annually funded)

100,000 110,000 120,000 125,000
Outfalls Repairs
(Annually funded)

600,000 300,000 600,000 600,000
BBF Golf Renovation:
minimal repairs

1,580,150

Park Shade
Structures (5)
1,000,000 500,000
totals 7,330,000 2,000,000 1,990,150 1,720,000 1,225,000 City Hall
Improvements*
46,353,570 5,017,464
7,330,000 48 ,353 ,570 7,007 ,614 1,720,000 1,225,000 Table Notes:

1. Green ﬁeld indicates Parks and Recreation category projects, gold ﬁeld indicates Facilities projects, blue ﬁeld represents Transportation category projects, orange ﬁeld indicates Streets and Infrastructure projects, and magenta ﬁeld indicates Sustainability and Energy category projects.

2. Current annual CIP funding is budgeted at $2 million/year. Proposed annual CIP funding that exceeds $2 million/year requires additional funds beyond the $2 million annual funding being allocated to the program. Where possible, staff will search for external funding to supplement projects.

3. Project estimates may be refined prior to future requests for funding. Escalation factors are applied to cost estimates in future years.

4. *The Accounting for the five-year plan of the City Hall Improvements project is a separate line item as it will most likely be funded from the Future Use Fund, whereas the remainder of the CIP will most likely be funded from the Capital Reserve and/or the General Fund.

Based on current economic forecasts, the City’s baseline CIP funding for the foreseeable future is estimated at approximately $2,000,000 annually. The five-year CIP has been structured to align with this funding level, with these base funds continuing to support smaller priority projects focused on health and safety and the rehabilitation of existing infrastructure.

However, two significant Council-directed initiatives, the City Hall Annex and the City Hall Improvements project, require funding beyond the base program. Accordingly, the FY 26– 27 budget includes an additional $4,730,000 from the Capital Reserve to support the City Hall Annex project. In addition, a total of $51,371,034 will be proposed in FY 27–28 and FY 28–29 from the Future Use Fund to complete the City Hall Improvements project.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 18
City Hall Improvements project
In December 2025, City Council approved the scope and increased funding for the City Hall Improvements project. In the December 16, 2025 staff report, the projected expenditures and encumbrances (e.g. contracts) for the renovation project were distributed over the next five fiscal years:

TABLE - CITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTED SPENDING (12/16/25) FY 25 -26 FY 26 -27 FY 27 -28 FY 28 -29 FY 29 -30 totals Projected
Expenditures
$793,824 $1,329,109 $7,704,743 $22,501,089 $22,042,269 $54,371,034 Projected
Encumbrances
$1,555,777

$3,824,198 $43,973,600 $5,017,464 $ 0 $54,371,034

Using those figures and considering the project’s currently approved funding of $3 million, the five-year plan for that project aligns as indicated in the table below.

TABLE - CITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS FIVE-YEAR PLAN
Project/ Current
Funding
FY 26 -27
Funding
Year 2
FY 27-28
Projected
Cost
Year 3
FY 28-29
Projected
Cost
Year 4
FY 29-30
Projected
Cost
Year 5
FY 30-31
Projected
Cost
City Hall

$3,000,000* $46,353,570 $5,017,464 $0 $0
*The funding available for the City Hall project before FY25-26 was $500,000 and an additional $2,500,000 was approved in December 2025 for a total of $3,000,000. Years 2-5 have yet to be approved.

Going forward, funding for the City Hall project is expected to be drawn primarily from the Future Use Fund, as discussed in December 2025. For clarity, the project is shown here as a separate line item. However, years 2–5 are anticipated to have significant impacts on the CIP, both financially and in terms of staffing resources.

Summary
In summary, the FY 26-27 CIP includes two major projects previously approved by City Council, along with long-deferred improvements to existing City facilities. The five-year plan prioritizes rehabilitation of aging infrastructure, investments that extend asset life cycles, and capital improvements that support public health, safety, and overall community well-being.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 19
Capital Improvement Programs Fiscal Year 2026 – 2027
and 5-Year Plan

Program Status Report

Overview
This section provides a status report on the existing and completed projects, broken into five categories of projects for ease of discussion. Allocation of projects into a category does not have direct financial implications and many projects could be placed into more than one category. However, the classifications are useful for reviewing the distribution of capital funds by asset types. Wherever possible, color coding is used to illustrate the project category, as indicated in the list below.

CATEGORY LEGEND:
1 Facilities: Yellow
2 Parks and Recreation: Green
3 Streets and Infrastructure: Orange
4 Transportation: Blue
5 Sustainability and Energy: Maroon

Within each category’s section, you will find
A. Funding Summary Table,
B. Status and Prioritization of Existing Projects, and C. Annual Progress [projections for five-year period].

Achievements – Completed Projects
In spite of limited resources in the past year, the CIP Division has successfully completed three projects and three additional projects as part of the FCA Implementation project.

Projects completed in FY 25-26, or which are scheduled for completion this year include:
• All-Inclusive Play Area & Adult-Assistive Bathroom Facility at Jollyman Park • City Lighting LED improvements
• Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP)
• FCA: Senior Center Fire Alarm System Upgrade
• FCA: Quinlan Community Center Chiller replacement
• FCA: Quinlan Community Center and Sports Center flat roofs replacements*

Staff anticipates that these projects will underspend their respective budgets by approximately $1,000,000. These underspent funds will be returned to the Capital Reserve (or other appropriate accounts based on the original source of any restricted funds). Public Works and Finance staff work together as part of the year-end process to close out completed projects, presenting this information as part of the first quarter report for the following fiscal year.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 20

TABLE – FY 25-26 COMPLETED CIP PROJECTS
Cat. Project name Project
Description
Year
Initiated
City
Funding
Grant
Funding
Developer
Funds
Project
Budget
Remaining
Funds*
P All Inclusive
Play Area &
Adult-Assistive
Bathroom
Facility
(Jollyman Park)
At Jollyman Park,
Design and
Construct an all-
inclusive
playground.
(Externally Funded,
in part)
FY18 -19 1,230,000 4,891,999 381,035
SCC AIPG grant FY18 -19 1,448,201
CA P&R grant FY21 -22 1,000,000
PG&E donation FY21 -22 25,000
CAP Allocation FY22 -23 652
City: Adult -assistive
bathroom added
FY22 -23 850,000
Art In -lieu fees FY23 -24 338,146
ST City Bridge
Maintenance
Repairs Project
(Bridge
Preventive
Maintenance
Program, or
BPMP)
Repair of five City
bridges as
recommended in
the Caltrans Bridge
Report along with
additional
improvements to
prolong the useful
life of the bridges.

FY15 -16 165,000 2,186,173 213,559
City Funding FY16 -17 535,000
FHWA FY16 -17 571,151
CAP Allocation FY22 -23 10,068
FHWA FY22 -23 716,296
FHWA FY23 -24 95,227
FHWA FY24 -25 510,521
City Funding FY24 -25 300,000
City Funding FY24 -25 1,176,105
ST City Lighting
LED
Improvements
Transition of City's
streetlight
infrastructure to
LED fixtures to
reduce light
pollution and
energy cost.
(Partially grant
funded)
FY21 -22 50,000 1,350,000 403,087
City Funding FY22 -23 1,300,000
EECBG grant FY23 -24 125,790
3 subtotal 5,616,825 4,467,186 363,146 8,428,172 997,682 *Table Note: The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date as of February 2026, not including contract encumbrances which may not yet be expensed.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 21
Current Projects
The Fiscal Year (FY) 25-26 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) included 24 projects, and three additional projects that were successfully completed. The CIP continues to advance previously approved, strategically-aligned projects and prioritizes safety through the repair and revitalization of existing infrastructure to preserve City facilities. The magnitude of projects also considers the current staffing levels and ensures that future projects are planned in a way that aligns with available resources for effective execution.

TABLE – FY 25-26 CIP PROJECTS LIST
F1 ADA Improvements (Annually funded)
F2 Facilities Condition Assessment (FCA) Implementation F3 City Hall Annex
F4 City Hall Improvements
F5Q Library Expansion Project: landscaping & courtyard P1 Lawrence Mitty Park and Trail Plan
P2 MRP West Parking Lot Improvements (Habitat monitoring) P3Q Annual Playground Replacement
P4Q Park Amenity Improvements
ST1 Outfalls Repairs
ST2 Vai Avenue Outfall
ST3 Stevens Creek Bridge Repair
ST4 McClellan Road Bridge Reconstruction
ST5 Street Light Installation - Annual Infill (Annually funded) T1 Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV Bikeway - Phase 2 Design & Phase 2A Construction T2 Roadway Safety Improvements (HSIP)
T3 Tamien Innu - East Segment
T4Q Tamien Innu - Central Segment
T5Q Tamien Innu - West Segment
T6Q Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV Bikeway - Phase 2B Construction T7Q Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV Bikeway - Bandley Dr. Signal T8Q School Walk Audit Implementation
SU1 Electric Vehicle Charging Station (EVCS) expansion - Service Center SU2 Photovoltaic Systems Design & Installation

Facilities Projects
Funding Summary
There are four funded and active Facilities projects, and one other funded project in the queue. (Yellow highlights new projects/funding, green highlights funding added during Q2 or Q3 of FY 25-26. Red text indicates grant funding that requires acceptance by Council).

Two projects received additional funding with the FY 26-27 budget and one project received additional funding within the FY 25-26 budget year.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 22

TABLE 1 –FACILITIES PROJECTS, FUNDING SUMMARY
# Project name Project
Description
Year
Initiated
City
Funding
Grant
Funding
Developer
Funds
Project
Budget
Remaining
Funds*
F1 ADA
Improvements
(Annually
funded)
Ongoing program to
improve
accessibility at all
public facilities
throughout the City.
(annually funded)
FY15 -16 865,000 979,984 301,993
CAP Allocation FY22 -23 4,984
City Funding FY25 -26 110,000
F2 Citywide
Facilities
Condition
Assessment
Implementation
(FCA)
Implement priority
projects identified
in the FCA reports.

FY18 -19 1,000,000 4,613,782 2,383,423
CAP Allocation FY22 -23 6,470
City funding FY23 -24 1,000,000
CDBG FY23 -24 367,951
CDBG (budget
mod. required)
FY24 -25 49,361
City Funding FY25 -26 940,000
City Funding FY26 -27 1,250,000
F3 City Hall Annex Renovation of
10455 Torre Avenue
site to include the
City’s Emergency
Operations Center
(EOC), and
workplace for use
as interim City Hall.

FY21 -22 3,000,000 8,025,000 2,566,456
City Funding FY21 -22 25,000
City Funding FY26 -27 5,000,000
F4 City Hall
Improvements
Renovation of the
existing City Hall
building with
upgrades to the
infrastructure and
interior workplace
environment.

FY21 -22 500,000 3,000,000 2,918,681
City Funding FY25 -26 2,500,000
F5Q Library
Expansion
Project
(landscaping
and other misc.
scope)
Grant funding (CPF,
Ro Khanna)
planned to
complete the
courtyard and
landscaping scopes
of work initiated
FY19 -20 8,705,438 9,705,438 1, 391,912
FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 23
with the 2022 -23
project.

CPF (budget mod.
required)
FY24 -25 1,000,000
5 subtotal 24,906,892 1,417,312 0 26,324,204 9,562,464 *Table Note: The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date as of February 2026, not including contract encumbrances not yet expensed.

Also, it does not fully account for the amount of grant funds that are expensed/received to date. If the project were to be defunded, for example, a more thorough accounting of the funds remaining on the project would be required.

Status and Prioritization of Existing Projects
F1. ADA Improvements: Public agencies in California are required to have ongoing programs to remove barriers to facilities, improving accessibility to entrances, bathrooms, parking, etc. This fund is applied to ongoing improvements in playgrounds, parks, and buildings.

Prioritization : Ongoing improvements to City facilities are necessary to ensure compliance with ADA laws. These projects are a priority in terms of Health and Safety, Regulatory/Legal Mandates, and Asset Conditions.

F2. Facilities Condition Assessment Project (FY 26-27 additional funding): In 2018 the “Comprehensive Facility Condition and Use Efficiency Assessment” report was completed.

This report was updated in 2022 by the “Facility Condition Assessment” (FCA). The FCA reviewed 48 facilities at 24 locations. The report identified $28.8 million of renewal projects, with $4 million in priority one projects in 2022 costs. The 2022 FCA report explained that “…conditions in this [priority one] category require immediate action to: a) correct a cited safety hazard, b) stop accelerated deterioration, and/or c) return a facility to operation.

Deficiencies in this category should be addressed in 0-12 Months.” That was almost five years ago.

The highest-priority projects include upgrades to life-safety systems and HVAC improvements. Other safety upgrades listed as Priority 1 are included in the work plan below. With the exception of the Library Fire Alarm System (FAS) planned for FY27-28, this completes the list of Priority One projects from the FCA Reports. Priority Two and other priorities remain and require further evaluation in context of current facility conditions.

Since the updated report was issued, the completed projects are:
• Sports Center Fire Control Center panel replacement
• Sports Center Seismic Retrofit
• Senior Center Fire Alarm System (FAS) upgrade (CDBG funding) • Quinlan Community Center (QCC) AC Chiller replacements

The following projects have been initiated:
• Sports Center Locker and Shower rooms improvements, design phase • Sports Center and QCC Flat Roof replacements
FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 24
• Senior Center Flat Roof Replacement and HVAC upgrades (CDBG) • QCC HVAC controls repairs

These projects will be initiated and/or completed in FY25-26:
• Creekside Park Recreation Building FAS
• Monta Vista - Pre-School Building FAS
• Monta Vista - Gymnastics Building FAS
• Service Center Administration Building FAS
• Sports Center FAS

These projects will be initiated in FY 26-27:
• Sports Center Locker and Shower rooms improvements, Construction • Misc. HVAC equipment upgrades at the Traffic Maintenance buildings, Service Center, BBF Pools, and Community Hall
• Flat Roof replacements at Monta Vista Pre-School and Gymnastics Buildings

This project is planned for FY 27-28 as part of the CIP 5-year plan:
• Library FAS

TABLE 3 – FCA PROJECT FISCAL SUMMARY

FY19-26 FUNDING:

FY19 City funds $1,000,000
FY23 CAP funds $6,470
FY24 City funds $1,000,000
FY24 CDBG grant (Senior Center) $367,951
FY25 CDBG grant (Senior Center) $55,469
FY26 City Funds $940,000
subtotal (a) $3,369,890

Completed Projects:

Completed FY19 -25 FCA Projects $583,991
QCC Chillers Replacement $211,500
Senior Center FAS Upgrade (CDBG) $367,951
subtotal (b) $1,163,442

Current Projects:

Sports Center Roof + QCC Flat Roofs $715,000
Senior Center Flat Roofs (est.) $200,000
Senior Center HVAC replacement (CDBG) $49,361
Sports Center Shower Rooms – Design only $59,000
QCC HVAC controls repairs (est.) $140,000
Monta Vista - Pre -School Bldg. FAS (est.) $75,000
Creekside Park Recreation Bldg. FAS (est.) $40,500
Monta Vista - Gymnastics Bldg. FAS (est.) $225,000
Service Center Administration Bldg. FAS (est.) $175,000 FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 25
Sports Center Bldg. FAS (est.) $375,000
subtotal (c) $2,053,861
Uncommitted project funds (a -b-c): $152,587

FY 26 -27 FCA Projects:

Sports Center Shower Rooms - Construction $950,000

Misc. HVAC upgrades: Traffic Maint. Bldgs.,
Service Center, BBF Pools, and Community Hall $100,000

Flat Roofing @ 2 Monta Vista Bldgs. $200,000
subtotal (c) $1,250,000
FY 26 -27 City funding $1,250,000

FY27 -28 FCA Projects:

Library FAS $1,300,000
$1,300,000

Prioritization: The FCA projects are critical health and safety improvements to existing facilities. Most of the improvements will decrease the City’s energy usage and thus reduce utility costs. These projects are a priority in terms of Health and Safety, Sustainability, and Asset Conditions.

F3. City Hall Annex (FY 26-27 additional funding): The City Hall Annex property was purchased in 2021, and the renovation project for the facility was funded at $3M in FY21-22.

The proximity of this property to the Civic Center, and its central location within the City, lends itself to numerous uses, including the permanent home of the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and interim or long-term uses as a satellite City Hall facility. The program centers on providing a permanent EOC, the public-facing Permit Center, and community meeting rooms.

The permit and construction documents are in development, the bid process will occur in Summer/Fall 2026, with construction scheduled to begin soon after.

Prioritization: Renovation of 10455 Torre will provide (a) a permanent location for the City’s Emergency Operations Center and (b) interim workplace and community meeting rooms for City Hall functions while City Hall is being renovated. These serve the community Health and Safety, and provide Community Benefit.

F4. City Hall (FY 25-26 additional funding): In December 2025, City Council approved the scope and increased funding for the City Hall Improvements project. It was decided that the scope of work will include:
a. Risk Category IV Renovation of Structural System
b. Maintain Current Footprint: Reconfigure Interior, no vertical or horizontal expansion
c. No Parking Expansion
d. Upgrades to Infrastructure and Accessibility

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 26
The budget has been revised to include an additional $2,500,000. The renovation and related expenses are now estimated at $54.5 million over a five-year period. The currently allocated $3 million will support contracts with a Bridging Architect and a Construction/Design Management firm to advance schematic design and further evaluate cost and scope options.

Staff anticipates the procurement of a Design-Build entity in the latter part of 2027.

Going forward, funding for the City Hall project is expected to be drawn primarily from the Future Use Fund, as discussed in December 2025. Years 2–5 are anticipated to have significant impacts on the CIP, both financially and in terms of staffing resources.

Prioritization: Renovation of the City Hall building will address Health and Safety and Asset Condition criterion by significantly upgrading the seismic capacity of the structure, provides Community Benefit by improvements to services and meeting facilities, and addresses Sustainability goals by the substantial improvements to energy-efficient appliances.

F5Q. Cupertino Library Expansion (queued): The Library Expansion project was completed in 2022 except for improvements to the interior courtyard and exterior landscaping. A Community Program Funding (CPF) grant was successfully applied for through Representative Ro Khanna’s office. In FY24-25, the agreement was finalized and work can be re-initiated when staffing resources and coordination with SCC Library District are in place.

Prioritization: The Library Expansion project is a great community benefit, and the improvements to the landscaping, courtyard, and other systems will further those goals.

Annual Progress
FY 26-27: A few existing CIP projects are nearing completion, including the Stevens Creek Blvd Class IV Bike Lanes, Phase 2A, the Photovoltaic Systems Installation, and the Electric Vehicle Charging Station (EVCS) expansion - Service Center, which will allow staff to focus on other existing project initiatives, as well as to redouble efforts on the City Hall Annex and City Hall Improvement projects. FY 26-27 will result in renewed focus on these two projects, as well as the Tamien Innu and Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail Projects.

FY 27-28: CIP will request additional funding to replace the FAS in the Cupertino Library building. In this fiscal year we may be able to coordinate these projects with infrastructure improvements at the Library to electrify the appliances, improve energy efficiency, and increase the resiliency of the facility to better serve the community as a cooling/heating center. Public Works (PW) staff is currently working with Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) and the Santa Clara County (SCC) to develop a program and technical requirements for this initiative.

FY 27-28 and onwards: addressing the highest priority projects in the FCA will be ongoing for both CIP and the Operations staff. More roof repairs are needed and FAS, HVAC systems, and other critical systems need improvements. The FCA project may help to FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 27
address additional improvements to the various Recreation facilities (Sports Center, McClellan Ranch Preserve, Blackberry Farm, Senior Center, Quinlan Community Center) that could improve accessibility and infrastructure, advancing safety, functionality, and revenue-generating capacity of these facilities.

The CIP welcomes the opportunity to take on projects to renovate or replace City Hall and the City Hall Annex. These are significant investments, both financially and on staffing resources, that must be considered in conjunction with the overall City annual budget and financing options. If these projects do have the support of Council and the community, CIP will require an additional senior-level full-time employee (FTE) to manage those projects.

Parks and Recreation Projects
Funding Summary
There are two funded and active Parks projects, three new projects for FY 26-27, one new project for FY 26-27 with funding to be determined, and two other funded projects that are in the queue. (Yellow highlights new projects/funding).

TABLE – PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS, FUNDING SUMMARY
# Project name Project
Description
Year
Initiated
City
Funding
Grant
Funding
Developer
Funds
Project
Budget
Remaining
Funds*
P1 Lawrence -Mitty
Park and Trail
Plan

*Annexing Costs
were $2,330,085
Design and
construct a new
park and trail
extension. Located
on 7.8 acres
adjacent to
Saratoga Creek,
near the
intersection of
Lawrence
Expressway and
Mitty Way.

FY18 -19 8,270,994 9,181,084 5,756,750
CAP Allocation FY23 -24 90
Berm Clean -up FY23 -24 910,000
P2 MRP West
Parking Lot
Improvements
(Habitat
monitoring
continues to
2028)
Design and
construct a new
“green” meadow-
style parking lot
that is compatible
with the creek
environment at
McClellan Ranch
West, which was
designed to have
minimal impact to
the site. *Only
habitat monitoring
is active.

FY16 -17 400,000 1,166,307 28,513
FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 28
City Funding FY17 -18 550,000
City Funding FY18 -19 65,000
City Funding FY19 -20 37,276
CAP Allocation FY20 -21 17,406
City Funding FY20 -21 39,200
City Funding FY22 -23 57,425
P3Q Annual
Playground
Replacement
Replacement of
older playground
equipment that is
dated and worn.
(5yrs funding x
$300K)
FY20 -21
to FY24-
25 1,500,000 1,500,000 916,329
P4Q Park Amenity
Improvements
Funding for various
park amenities
such as benches,
hydration stations,
outdoor table
tennis, cornhole,
shade structures,
pickleball striping,
etc. (3yrs funding x
$200K)
FY20 -21
to FY22-
23 600,000 600,000 351,422
4 subtotal 12, 447 ,391 0 0 12, 447 ,391 7, 533,014 P5 BBF Golf Course
Pro Shop
Renovation
Interior renovation
to improve
functionality and
code compliance.

FY26 -27 120,000 120,000 120,000
P6 Blesch
Residence
Improvements
Demolition of the
existing residential
building, replace
with minimal
grading, natural
habitat and modest
pathway[s].

FY26 -27 TBD TBD NA
P7 Memorial Park
Pickleball Sound
Attenuation
Provide sound
attenuation and a
new structurally
reinforced fence.

FY26 -27 150 ,000 150 ,000 150 ,000
P8 Sports Center
Courts
Resurfacing
Resurfacing the
courts to provide
safe and consistent
surfaces.

FY26 -27 210,000 210,000 210,000
8 total 12,927,391 0 0 12,927,391 7, 533,014
*Table Note: The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date as of February 2026, not including contract encumbrances not yet expensed.

Status and Prioritization of Existing Parks and Recreation Projects FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 29
P1. Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail Plan: In July 2024, City Council approved the Conceptual Design of the project and adopted the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). Construction/Permitting documents (PS&E, or “Plans, Specifications and Estimates”) were developed to 60% completion for use in the Regulatory/ Environmental Permitting phase. The project team is working to secure the requirements for the habitat from Department of Environmental Health and Army Corp of Engineers. The milestone schedule is indicated below.

Regulatory Permitting December 2025 to June 2026
Construction Documents (95% PS&E) July 2026 to Augu st 2026 Bid and Permitting (including 100% PS&E) September 2026 to November 2026 Construction December 2026 to November 2027

Prioritization: The design and engineering team is under contract (i.e., encumbered) through the completion of construction, and substantial investment has already been made to address the site’s regulatory and environmental requirements through the CEQA process. Project funding is secured through a developer agreement, which would need to be revisited if defunding is considered. This project is a high priority in Climate Resilience and Sustainability, Strategic Alignment [with the General Plan and Parks and Recreation System Master Plan], and Community Benefit and Equity.

P2. MRP West Parking Lot Improvements (Habitat monitoring continues to 2027): The habitat monitoring at the McClellan Ranch Preserve west parking lot is a requirement of the project’s California Department of Fish and Wildlife permit. The parking area project was completed in 2019. The habitat monitoring will continue until 2027. This year’s report noted that all criteria are met or exceeded: “Native vegetation appears to be establishing well and is particularly successful in the center of the mitigation area. … Other plants that are showing vigorous growth throughout the mitigation area … The irrigation system appears to have served its purpose, allowing plants to naturalize and expand. …WRA recommends that the City continue its weed treatment plan in the areas outside of the cages to maintain a low cover by undesirable weeds.”
Prioritization: This project is a high priority in Regulatory/Legal Mandates, Climate Resilience and Sustainability, and Community Benefit and Equity.

P3Q. Annual Playground Replacement: Staffing capacity has resulted in temporary delays to these replacement projects. It is anticipated that the next phase of replacements will begin during FY 26-27. Varian Park, Little Rancho Park and Canyon Oak Park are targets for improvements.

Prioritization: The Playground Replacement project could be defunded since we are not in-contract presently, but the need to replace our aging playgrounds persists as an ongoing safety concern. If not replaced, many playgrounds will need to be closed, at least in part. These projects are a priority in terms of Health and Safety, Regulatory/Legal Mandates, and Asset Condition and Infrastructure Risk.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 30
P4Q. Park Amenity Improvements: The Park Amenity Improvements project continues to supply new benches, picnic tables, and other vital features to parks as required.

Prioritization: The Park Amenity Improvements project could be defunded but has been a valuable resource to address needed improvements and community requests/concerns in our parks. These projects are a priority in terms of Health and Safety, Regulatory/Legal Mandates, and Asset Condition and Infrastructure Risk.

Upcoming Initiatives
FY 26-27: Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail project and MRP West Parking Habitat monitoring continues. The four new projects would be initiated. Work on the design, procurement, and installation of new equipment at playgrounds could resume in the Summer of 2027.

FY 27-28: Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail project and MRP West Parking Habitat monitoring projects will be completed in this fiscal year. Work on the Playgrounds replacements can continue. Improvements at the Blesch Property can be initiated.

FY 28-29: Initiating the improvements to the irrigation system at the Blackberry Farm golf course is also a priority to improve efficient use of our water resources.

FY 29-30 and FY 30-31: Blackberry Farm golf course irrigation system improvements will continue into this fiscal year. Providing Shade Structures at various park locations was a Council-stated priority in years past, and improving shade opportunities is a priority of the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan. Staff will continue to pursue grant funding for these amenities.

Streets and Infrastructure Projects
Funding Summary
There are five funded and active CIP projects that are considered Streets and Infrastructure projects.

TABLE - STREETS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS, FUNDING SUMMARY # Project name Project
Description
Year
Initiated
City
Funding
Grant
Funding
Developer
Funds
Project
Budget
Remaining
Funds*
ST1 Outfalls Repairs Following the
recommendations
of the 2024 Outfalls
Report
FY25 -26 950,000 950,000 950,000
City Funding FY25 -26 950,000
FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 31
ST 2 Vai Avenue
Outfall
Investigate, design,
and replace
existing failing 36”
corrugated metal
pipe (CMP) storm
drain line with new
reinforced concrete
pipe (RCP) or high-
density
polyethylene
(HDPE) pipe.

FY24 -25 490,000 490,000 434,804
ST 3 Stevens Creek
Bridge Repair
Stevens Creek Blvd
Bridge over Stevens
Creek. Prepare
feasibility study and
PS&E to determine
and implement
appropriate scour
countermeasures.
(Externally Funded,
in part)
FY23 -24 172,000 860,000 771,982
FHWA highway
Bridge Program
grant
FY23 -24 688,000
ST 4 McClellan Road
Bridge
Replacement
Removal and
replacement of the
bridge on
McClellan Road
near the entrance
to McClellan Ranch
Preserve.
(Externally Funded -

CA DOT)
FY23 -24 5,000,000 5,850,000 #######
CPF (Budget Mod.

Required)
FY24 -25 850,000
ST 5 Street Light
Installation -
Annual Infill
Infill of streetlights
as requested by
residents. (Annually
funded)
FY17 -18 430,000 430,536 138,882
CAP Allocation FY22 -23 536
5 subtotal 2,992,536 6,538,000 0 8,580,536 8,145,668 *Table Note: The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date as of February 2026, not including contract encumbrances not yet expensed.

Status and Prioritization of Existing Streets and Infrastructure Projects ST1. Outfalls Repairs : The purpose of the 2024 Storm Drain Outfall Condition Assessment report was to inventory the storm drain assets and to determine necessary improvements and maintenance activities for the outfall pipes and structures. The City maintains 175 FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 32
outfall pipe segments, totaling approximately 17,051 feet, within the storm drain network.

The outfall pipes discharge urban rainfall runoff from the City’s storm drain system into various creeks/channels managed by the Santa Clara Valley Water District (Valley Water).

The report documented observations of the condition of outfall pipes, along with their corresponding outfall structure, and nearest upstream structure. The primary assessment method for the pipeline segments and outfall structures consisted of closed circuit television (CCTV), visual examinations and documentation through photographs.

The report assessed 205 pipe segments across 175 sites. 31% show structural defects with significant defect grades (NASCO grades 4 and 5). 19% have significant defects that affect operations and maintenance. Most of the defective pipes were CMP outfall pipes that were installed consistent with Valley Water specifications for outfall pipes which were in place at the time of installation. Grade 3, 4, and 5 defects were common in pipelines that were constructed from corrugated metal pipe (CMP). This is due to the susceptibility of CMP to corrosion, which leads to holes developing in the pipes. Though not as common, several CMP pipelines also showed signs of deformation.

The report also assessed the condition of 117 outfall structures. Most of the structures were in good to moderate condition. Of the 117 outfalls structures three were in level 5 defective condition, and three were in level 4 defective condition. The City will coordinate with Valley Water to plan for the most efficient and cost-effective manner in repairing these outfall structures.

This will be an ongoing project to improve the conditions of the infrastructure.

Prioritization : The Community’s health and safety depends on a functional stormwater system.

ST2. Vai Avenue Outfall : Vai Avenue Outfall repair was completed, however replacement of the Outfall remains a priority. Staff is coordinating with Valley Water on permanent repairs as part of their CIP project to stabilize Regnart Creek in this reach. This will create efficiencies in permitting and ensure a repair that is compatible with Valley Water’s efforts Prioritization : The Community’s health and safety depends on a functional stormwater system.

ST3. Stevens Creek Bridge Repair :

Investigative work for this project has been completed, and staff are actively coordinating with the City’s engineering team and Caltrans to determine the most feasible implementation option. The bridge has been identified as “scour critical” in its biennial bridge inspection report, underscoring the need for timely improvements. Notably, the project is largely supported by external funding, with approximately 80% of costs anticipated to be covered through Caltrans funding programs.

ST4. McClellan Road Bridge Reconstruction : The City has executed a contract with a structural engineering firm to assess the current conditions, provide design alternatives, and develop the necessary design, documentation and cost estimates. Once this documentation FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 33
is completed, the project will have an increased likelihood of securing additional grant funding to complete construction the project.

Cupertino. The City has secured $5,850,000 in external funding for the project, with an additional $3,000,000 estimated to complete improvements. Staff will continue to pursue additional external funding opportunities to fully fund the project.

ST5. Street Light Installation - Annual Infill :

There are locations within the city where residents have requested additional streetlighting to improve visibility. These requests are evaluated by staff for consistency with the City’s established spacing policy, and, where appropriate, are incorporated into future installation plans. Current efforts are focused on advancing new streetlight installations in the East Estates Drive, West Estates Drive, and Lindenbrook Lane neighborhood.

Annual Progress
FY 26-27: The City expects to have studied options to determine the scope of work for the repairs of Stevens Creek Bridge, by the end of 2025. The engineering team for the McClellan Road Bridge project is identified and contractually engaged. Engineering work and funding resourcing will continue for the Stevens Creek and McClellan Road bridge projects.

FY 27-28: Work on the first three outfall projects should be complete in this fiscal year, and the City expects to propose additional outfall projects to address priority projects from the outfall assessment report.

FY 28-29:

Ongoing efforts on the bridge projects is anticipated. Additional priority outfall repairs are planned for initiation, focusing on locations identified through recent assessments as having the greatest need for rehabilitation to ensure continued system reliability and proper stormwater conveyance.

FY 29-30 and FY 30-31: Engineering and environmental analysis will continue for both bridge projects. Additional outfall repair projects are anticipated.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 34
Transportation Projects
Funding Summary
There are three funded and active Transportation projects, one new project for FY 26-27, and five other funded projects that are in the queue. (Yellow highlights new projects/funding).

TABLE - TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS, FUNDING SUMMARY
# Project name Project
Description
Year
Initiated
City
Funding
Grant
Funding
Developer
Funds
Project
Budget
Remaining
Funds*
T1 Stevens Creek
Blvd CL IV
Bikeway Phase
2A
Design and
Construction of the
separated bikeway
along Stevens
Creek Blvd from
Wolfe Road to
DeAnza Blvd.
(Externally Funded,
in part)
FY20 -21 350,000 2,385,782 2,135,377
Construction, City
Funding
FY21 -22 2,000,000
CAP Allocation FY22 -23 35,782
OBAG FY24 -25 807,000
SB1 FY24 -25 693,000
T2 Roadway Safety
Improvements -
HSIP
High Friction
pavement
treatment and
speed feedback
signage added to
seventeen
locations.
(Externally Funded,
in part)
FY24 -25 356,180 3,561,800 3,513,115
HSIP Grant FY24 -25 3,205,620
T3 Tamien Innu -
East Segment
Design and
construct an off-
street bicycle and
pedestrian facility
parallel to the I-280
HWY, from Wolfe
Rd. to Vallco
Parkway (Externally
Funded & Apple)
FY20 -21 600,000 2,536,000 2,001,081
VTA Measure B FY21 -22

1,936,000
FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 35
T4Q Tamien Innu -
Central Segment
Design and
construct an off-
street bicycle and
pedestrian facility
parallel to the I-280
HWY, from De Anza
Blvd. to Wolfe Road
(Externally Funded -
Apple)
FY20 -21 600,000 4,785,000 See East
Segment
VTA Measure B,
Design
FY20 -21 460,000
VTA Measure B,
Construction
FY20 -21 3,725,000
T5Q Tamien Innu -
West Segment
Design and
construct an off-
street bicycle and
pedestrian facility
parallel to the I-280
HWY, from the Don
Burnett Bicycle –
Pedestrian Bridge
to De Anza Blvd.
(Externally Funded -
Apple)
FY20 -21 600,000 600,000 600,000
T6Q Stevens Creek
Blvd CL IV
Bikeway Phase
2B Construction
Construction of the
separated bikeway
along Stevens
Creek Blvd from De
Anza Blvd to US-85.

This includes signal
upgrades at
Bandley Drive.

FY20 -21 0 0
T7Q Bandley
Intersection
Signal upgrades at
Bandley Drive.

Scope of work will
be included in SCB
Phase 2B for
efficiency.
(Externally Funded,
in part)
FY18 -19 150,090 142,210
In -Lieu funds FY18 -19 25,658
City funding FY18 -19 124,432
FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 36
T8Q School Walk
Audit
Implementation
Construct
infrastructure-
related
improvements
around schools that
were identified as
part of the
comprehensive
School Walk Audit
study. (Externally
Funded - Apple)
FY18 -19 250,000 1,472,517 24,338
Apple Funding FY19 -20 1,221,863
CAP Allocation FY22 -23 654
8 subtotal 3,117,048 10,826 ,620 3,047,521 15,491,189 13,986,831 T9 SCB/SR 85 NB
ramp
Intersection
improvements
Improve traffic
conditions for all
users at this
intersection.

Developer In-Lieu
fees funded.

FY26 -27 0 600,000 600,000
Dev In -Lieu fees FY26 -27 600,000
9 total 3,117,048 10,826 ,620 3, 647,521 16,091,189 14,586,831 *Table Note: The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date as of February 2026, not including contract encumbrances not yet expensed.

Status and Prioritization of Existing Projects
T1. The Stevens Creek Boulevard Class IV Bikeway, Phase 2A project is under construction.

Prioritization: Stevens Creek Boulevard Class IV Bikeways is the top priority from the Bicycle Transportation plan, and a Tier One priority of the Pedestrian Transportation Plan – improving vehicular, bicyclist and pedestrian safety along one of Cupertino’s busiest arteries was considered a highly important project. Construction of Phase 2A (Wolfe Road to De Anza Boulevard) is underway.

T2. Roadway Safety Improvements project (HSIP) documents are ready for the City to advertise the project for bid and construction. Once awarded, the construction time is anticipated to be complete before the end of the calendar year.

Prioritization: The Roadway Safety Improvements project is grant funded with local matching funds. Roadway improvements provide health and safety benefits as well as economic benefit to the community.

T3, T4Q and T5Q. Tamien Innu East, Central and West Trail Segments: For the East trail segment, design phase is conceptually approved by the adjacent property owner and Valley Water. The project team is developing the engineer’s bidding and construction drawings FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 37
and specifications. The Central and West segments of the trail will re-enter design phase once the East segment is substantially complete.

Prioritization: The Tamien Innu project, specifically the East segment, has been delayed due to efforts to address physical constraints and Valley Water requirements during the design phase. The design is now progressing. It is funded entirely by developer and donation funds and grants.

T6Q and T7Q. The Stevens Creek Boulevard Class IV Bikeway, Phase 2B project and Bandly Drive Signal Improvements is 95% complete in the design phase. The City will search for external funding options prior to commencing with bidding and construction.

Prioritization: Phase 2B (De Anza Boulevard to Mary Avenue) is 95% designed and ready to bid, but the funding for construction, external funding and/or internal funding, will require reconsideration by City Council. Bandley Intersection improvements, a portion of Phase 2B are partially funded by Developer In-Lieu fees from FY18-19.

T8Q. School Walk Audit Implementation’s Tier 3 projects at Hyannisport Drive and Tantau/Barnhart are initiated. Implementation will be a priority after the school year.

Prioritization: Cupertino Safe Routes to School (SR2S) worked with each public school in Cupertino to develop a list of infrastructure improvements called the Walk Audit Report. The projects resulting from the Audit report will make walking and biking safer, and drop-off and pick-up smoother.

Annual Progress
FY 26-27: Stevens Creek Boulevard (SCB) Phase 2A will be completed before the end of calendar year 2026. Phase 2B, including work at Bandley Intersection, is not currently scheduled for the 5-year CIP.

Design for the Roadway Safety Improvements project is anticipated to be completed this calendar year, with construction initiation anticipated in summer 2026.

Tamien Innu, East segment design, will be finalized by summer 2026, and bidding and construction can begin soon after. Once construction is initiated on the East segment, design on the Central segment can resume.

FY 27-28: Work on SCB Phase 2B may restart if external funding can be acquired. The remaining School Walk Audit Implementation projects are planned to be completed.

Tamien Innu Central Segment is anticipated to be in the design phase. The City expects the Active Transportation Plan to be completed, adopted, and will inform future CIP planning efforts.

FY 28-29, FY 29-30 and FY 30-31: Potential transportation projects are anticipated based on information from the approved ATP.

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 38

Sustainability and Energy Projects
Funding Summary
There are two currently funded and active Sustainability projects. One project was awarded grant funds during the FY 25-26 budget cycle, indicated with a green highlight.

TABLE–SUSTAINABILITY AND ENERGY PROJECTS, FUNDING SUMMARY # Project name Project
Description
Year
Initiated
City
Funding
Grant
Funding
Developer
Funds
Project
Budget
Remaining
Funds*
SU1 EVCS expansion -
Service Center
The construction of
electric vehicle
charging station
(EVCS)
infrastructure for
the electrification
of the City’s fleet.

FY24 -25 560,000 785,230 775,585
SVCE grant funding FY25 -26 225,230
SU2 Photovoltaics
Systems Design
& Installation
This project will
design-build PV
systems at three
locations: Quinlan
Community Center,
Cupertino Sports
Center, and
Community Hall.

FY24 -25 6,300,000 6,300,000 5,513,958
2 subtotal 6,860,000 225,230 0 7,085,230 6,289,543 *Table Note: The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date as of February 2026, not including contract encumbrances not yet expensed.

Status and Prioritization of New and Existing Sustainability Projects SU1. EVCS expansion - Service Center project is under construction.

Prioritization: The EVCS expansion at Service Center project is necessary for the ongoing electrification of the City’s fleet. This project is currently funded and supported through SVCE.

SU2. Photovoltaics Systems Design & Installation project is under construction. The installations at Sports Center and Community Hall are complete. Construction at the Quinlan Community Center Alves parking is scheduled for October 2026 completion.

Prioritization: The project is under construction and will reduce the City’s utility costs once initiated.

Projected Progress of the Projects
In the next five years, the broad sustainability goals for City facilities focus on:

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 39
1) Reducing overall energy use through efficiency improvements to equipment controls and building envelopes.
2) Moving away from using natural gas to power heating and cooling equipment and look for opportunities to electrify equipment wherever possible, especially where PV systems exist.
3) Improve the HVAC and power capabilities of the Library and Quinlan Community Center to serve as Resiliency Centers, enabling reliable shelter in the event of extreme heat, cold, or poor air quality.
4) Meet the water conservation requirements of AB 1572 for non-functional turf.

Projects required to achieve these goals can be categorized into (a) large facility-wide projects or (b) smaller equipment-specific projects, and would be further subdivided into either CIP projects that require engineering support, or those Special Projects/Maintenance efforts implemented by the Facilities division of Public Works. The larger facility-wide projects have been captured above in the “Unfunded Sustainability Projects” table, but smaller equipment-specific projects may occur when replacement becomes a necessity or as funding opportunities arise.

Working in partnership with BayREN, the Sustainability group identified several rebate opportunities that may fund water heater or other smaller equipment replacements.

BayREN also identified equipment run-time trimming recommendations that may have short-term energy and cost savings. Additionally, the City is part of a regional coalition of several jurisdictions seeking to work together to pursue grant funding for Resiliency Center upgrades across the county.

Given the various approaches described above and uncertain funding, Sustainability staff will continue to work with CIP and Facilities staff to coordinate on potential projects, pursue.

Summary - CIP Funding for FY 26-27
TABLE – CIP FUNDING BY PROJECT
# Project City
Funding
Grant
Funding
Developer
Funds
Project
Budget
F1 ADA Improvements (Annually
funded)
979,984 0 0 979,984
F2 Facilities Condition Assessment
(FCA) Implementation
*Includes FY 26-27 funding
4,196,470 417,312 0 4,613,782
F3 City Hall Annex
*Includes FY 26-27 funding
8,025,000 0 0 8,025,000
F4 City Hall Improvements 3,000,000 0 0 3,000,000
F5Q Library Expansion Project:
landscaping & courtyard
8,705,438 1,000,000 0 9,705,438
P1 Lawrence Mitty Park and Trail
Plan
9,181,084 0 0 9,181,084
FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 40
P2 MRP West Parking Lot
Improvements (Habitat
monitoring)
1,166,307 0 0 1,166,307
P3Q Annual Playground Replacement 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000 P4Q Park Amenity Improvements 600,000 0 0 600,000
ST1 Outfalls Repairs 950,000 0 0 950,000
ST2 Vai Avenue Outfall 490,000 0 0 490,000
ST3 Stevens Creek Bridge Repair 172,000 688,000 0 860,000 ST4 McClellan Road Bridge
Reconstruction
5,850,000 0 5,850,000
ST5 Street Light Installation - Annual
Infill (Annually funded)
430,536 0 0 430,536
T1 Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV Bikeway
- Phase 2 Design & Phase 2A
Construction
2,385,782 1,500,000 0 2,385,782
T2 Roadway Safety Improvements
(HSIP)
356,180 3,205,620 0 3,561,800
T3 Tamien Innu - East Segment 0 1,936,000 600,000 2,536,000 T4Q Tamien Innu - Central Segment 0 4,185,000 600,000 4,785,000 T5Q Tamien Innu - West Segment 0 0 600,000 600,000
T6Q Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV Bikeway
- Phase 2B Construction
0 0 0 0
T7Q Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV Bikeway
- Bandley Dr. Signal
124,432 0 25,658 150,090
T8Q School Walk Audit
Implementation
250,654 0 1,221,863 1,472,517
SU1 Electric Vehicle Charging Station
(EVCS) expansion - Service
Center
560,000 225,230 0 785,230
SU2 Photovoltaic Systems Design &
Installation
6,300,000 0 0 6,300,000
Subtotal 49,373,867 19,007,162 3,047,521 69,928,550 FY 26 -27 NEW PROJECTS
P5 BBF Golf Course Pro Shop
Renovation
120,000 0 0 120,000
P6 Blesch Residence Improvements TBD 0 0 0
P7 Memorial Park Pickleball Sound
Attenuation
150,000 0 0 150,000
P8 Sports Center Courts Resurfacing 210,000 0 0 210,000 T9 SCB/SR 85 NB ramp Intersection
improvements
0 0 600,000 600,000
FY 26 -27 Total 49,853,867 19,007,162 3,647,521 71,008,550

FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 41
TABLE – FUNDING DISTRIBUTION BY FUND TYPE
For Existing and New Projects Only
Funds FY 26 -27 FY 25 -26 FY 24 -25 FY 23 -24 FY 22 -23 Sub total :

FY22 to 16
Totals
Tax Supported Funds
Capital Improvement
Fund (General Fund) –
420
2,000,000 2,000,000 7,750,000 2,482,000 652,425 19,051,330 33,935,755 Capital Reserve
(General Fund) – 429
4,730,000 0 4,730,000
Stevens Creek Corridor
Park Capital Projects –
427
0 0
Special Revenue Funds
Storm Drain
Improvement Fund -
210
0 0
Park Dedication Fund -
280
0 0
Transportation Fund –
270
356,180 0 356,180
Transportation Impact
Fee – 271
0 0
Housing & Community
Development -260
0 0
Enterprise Funds
Blackberry Farm Golf
Course Fund - 560
0 0
Sports Center Fund -
570
0 0
Recreation Programs
Fund - 580
0 0
Funds (Continued) FY 26 -27 FY 25 -26 FY 24 -25 FY 23 -24 FY 22 -23 Sub total :

FY22 to 16
Totals
External Funding
CAP Allocation 65,922 0 65,922
SVCE grant (Service Ctr
EVCS)
225,230 0 225,230
Apple Funding (Tamien
Innu & School Walk)
3,021,863 3,021,863
Developer In -Lieu fees
(Bandley + LMPT)
600,000 8,296,652 8,896,652
VTA Measure B (Design,
Central)
460,000 460,000
VTA Measure B
(Construction, Central &
East)
5,661,000 5,661,000
HSIP 3,205,620 0 3,205,620
FY 26–27 CIP Book Page 42
OBAG (SCB Ph 2A) 807,000 0 807,000
SB1 (SCB Ph 2A) 693,000 0 693,000
CA DOT grant
(SCBridge)
5,000,000 0 5,000,000
CPF (SCBridge &
Library)
1,850,000 0 1,850,000
FHWA (SCBridge) 688,000 0 688,000
Future Use Fund (CH) 2,500,000 0 2,500,000
CDBG grant (FCA) 49,361 367,951 0 417,312
totals 7,330,000 4,725,230 14,711,161 8,537,951 718,347 36,490,845 72,513,534 Completed Projects
Capital Improvement
Fund (General Fund) –
420 (LED, JAIPG)
2,150,000 1,280,000 3,430,000
Transportation Fund –
270 (BPMP)
1,476,105 700,000 2,176,105
CAP Allocation -
Completed projects
(JAIPG & BPMP)
10,720 0 10,720
EECBG (LED project) 125,790 0 125,790
FHWA (BPMP) 510,521 95,227 716,296 571,151 1,893,195 Art In -Lieu (JAIPG) 338,146 0 338,146
PG&E donation (JAIPG) 25,000 25,000
CA Parks & Rec
Specified grant (JAIPG)
1,000,000 1,000,000
SCC AIPG grant (JAIPG) 1,448,201 1,448,201
totals 0 0 2,112,416 433,373 2,877,016 5,024,352 10,447,157

FY 2026 – 2027 CIP Book Page 43

Capital Improvement Programs Fiscal Year 2026 – 2027
and 5-Year Plan

CIP Project Narratives

CIP FY26-27 5-YEAR PLAN

PROJECT NARRATIVES
PAGE 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. New
B. Current
Facilities
Parks
Streets
Transportation
Sustainability
C. Completed
FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Council Meetin g 4/02/2025 Page 30 of 34

INSERT SECTION PAGE (GRAPHICS!)

A. NEW PROJECTS
City of Cupertino
CIP FY26-27 5-YEAR PLAN

PROJECT NARRATIVES
PAGE 1
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Blackberry Farm Pro Shop Renovation page 1

FY 26-27 City Funding $ 120,000

Total Funding $ 120,000
City Funding FY 26-27 $ 120,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) N.A.

Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan N.A.

Project Category Parks & Recreation
Project Type Design & Construction
Origin of Request Parks & Recreation
FY Initiated FY 26-27 (pending)

Project Description
The Blackberry Farm Golf Course Pro Shop serves more than 40,000 golfers annually and is central to the visitor experience. However, the facility has not been comprehensively renovated in many years and is now outdated, inefficient, and out of alignment with current accessibility and building standards. This project prop oses a full renovation to improve functionality, safety, and customer service, including a new service counter, replacement of worn finishes, ADA upgrades, and modernization of the existing electrical system to meet current code requirements.

Project Justification
Renovating the pro shop is necessary to bring the facility up to the City’s ADA, electrical, and saf ety standards, improve functionality for staff, and enhance the overall experience for golfers. The proposed upgrades will address deferred maintenance, reduce operational and safety risks, and ensure the pro shop reflects the level of service and accessibility expected of a City-owned facility. It is important to note that the pro shop was not in cluded in the 2018 Facility Condition Assessment Report.

Prioritization Total Points: 280

Health & Safety 4 The facility is in poor condition and requires electrical upgrades.

The outdated systems will be modernized to meet current code and operational needs.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 ADA and electrical upgrades are needed.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
5 The antiquated pro shop requires significant renovation, including electrical upgrades. Planned improvements include a new service counter, replacement of worn flooring and ceiling materials, and ADA accessibility upgrades.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 0 N.A.

Strategic Alignment 0 The facilities at the Golf Course, including the Pro Shop, were not included in the 2018 Facility Condition Assessment Report.

Community Benefit & Equity 4 The Blackberry Farm Golf Course Pro Shop serves over 40,000 golfers annually and is central to the visitor experience, but staff regularly receive complaints about its deteriorating condition.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
2 Facility improvements will decrease operational time and effort.

Project Readiness 2 Scope schematically defined. RFP/Bid procurement process required to secure contractor to complete the work.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Blackberry Farm Pro Shop Renovation page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
Negligible anticipated impact to operating budget.

Funding Information
No grant funding

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0

Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) 2025-26
Actual
2026-27
Projected
2027-28
Projected
2028-29
Projected
2029-30
Projected
2030-31
Projected
T.B.D. N.A. $120,000

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Renovation work can be completed within one fiscal year.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation July 2026
Consultant Procurement September 2026
Planning/Pre-Design November 2026
Design October 2026
Permitting & Environmental Clearance December 2026
Construction Bid January 2027
Contract Award and Contracting March 2027
Construction April 2027
Post-Construction/Close-out May 2027

Project Location

22100 Stevens Creek Boulevard

Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Blesch Property Improvements page 1

FY 26-27 City Funding TBD

Total Funding TBD
City Funding FY 26-27 TBD
External Funding TBD
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) N.A.

Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan General Plan
Project Category Parks & Recreation
Project Type Design & Construction
Origin of Request Public Works, Council
FY Initiated FY 26-27 (pending)

Project Description
Demolition of the existing residential building to be replaced with minimal grading , natural habitat and modest pathway[s]. The initial phase will develop preliminary cost estimates for demolition of the existing structure, conceptual planning, design and engineering of the site, and construction of the improvements.

Project Justification
The Blesch property is an approximately 28,000 square foot parcel, currently developed with a single-family residence.

While the structure has been used for auxiliary City purposes since acquisition, it is not suitable for use as a public facility. Significant repairs, accessibility improvements and reconfiguration would be required for any public use.

Additionally, the site is located within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Fl ood Zone AE, with more than half of the property situated within the designated floodway. Being in a FEMA designated floodplain results in constraints which substantially limit the feasibility of maintaining or constructing vertical structures on the site and impose additional regulatory requirements, review timelines, and costs for any building construction.

Prioritization Total Points: 345

Health & Safety 5 The facility is in poor condition and unsuitable for public use.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 1 Removing the residential building from the flood plain will bring the parcel in compliance with FEMA and CMC zoning.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
5 Removing the structure will improve maintenance requirements for the property.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 5 Decreasing the built environment and increasing the natural habitat will provide climate resilience and decrease flood liability.

Strategic Alignment 5 The PRSMP notes this site is a “pollinator garden” opportunity.

Community Benefit & Equity 3 The planned improvements will make the site available to the public.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
1 The Site improvements will decrease operational time and effort.

Project Readiness 0 Scope is under development.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Blesch Property Improvements page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $39,000 When this park is completed, and ongoing maintenance efforts are added to operations, operating costs will increase for the Grounds Division. Ongoing needs are estimated at 0.2 FTE for Grounds ($ 34,000), along with increased expenditures for maintenance supplies estimated at $5,000 annually. An initial establishment period of 5 years may see increased staff time and expenditures.

Funding Information
No information at this time.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants TBD
Other External Sources TBD

Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) 2025-26
Actual
2026-27
Projected
2027-28
Projected
2028-29
Projected
2029-30
Projected
2030-31
Projected
T.B.D. N.A. TBD

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Depending on the scope and budget of the project, it is projected to last approximately two years.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation July 2026
Consultant Procurement August 2026
Planning/Pre-Design October 2026
Council review of Scope and Budget January 2027
Design and Engineering January - June 2027
Construction Bid July 2027
Contract Award and Contracting September 2027
Construction January 2028
Post-Construction/Close-out September 2028

Project Location

22050 Stevens Creek Boulevard

Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Memorial Park Pickleball Sound Attenuation page 1

FY 26-27 City Funding $ 150,000

Total Funding $ 150,000
City Funding FY 26-27 $ 150,000
External Funding $0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) N.A.

Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan N.A.

Project Category Parks & Recreation
Project Type Design & Construction
Origin of Request Public Works
FY Initiated FY 26-27 (pending)

Project Description
Provide sound attenuation measures at the Memorial Park Pickleball courts. The sound panels will require a new reinforced fence.

Project Justification
Neighboring residents have concerns about the degradation of the acoustic environment of their residences. Pickleball is very popular and generates great community. By providing sound attenuation to mitigate the n oise, we hope to create a better environment for all.

Prioritization Total Points: 255

Health & Safety 4 Sound dampening measures will provide acoustic improvement for the neighboring residences.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 Increasing the structural capacity of the fence is required to hold the sound panels.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
3 The facilities are in good shape, but the sound quality is not addressed/.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 0 N.A.

Strategic Alignment 0 Master Plans do not prescribe this work - this is a facility improvement that has an engineering component.

Community Benefit & Equity 4 By providing sound attenuation to mitigate the sound of the pickleball play, we hope to create a better environment for residents and players.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
1 The improvements will reduce risk.

Project Readiness 2 Cost estimates have been obtained.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Memorial Park Pickleball Sound Attenuation page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $3,000 Replacement costs of approximately $45,000 every 15 years.

Funding Information
No grant funding.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0

Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) 2025-26
Actual
2026-27
Projected
2027-28
Projected
2028-29
Projected
2029-30
Projected
2030-31
Projected
T.B.D. N.A. $ 150,000

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Work can be completed within the fiscal year.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation July 2026
Consultant Procurement N.A.

Planning/Pre-Design N.A.

Design N.A.

Permitting & Environmental Clearance N.A.

Construction Bid August 2026
Contract Award and Contracting November 2026
Construction February 2027
Post-Construction/Close-out May 2027

Project Location

Memorial Park

Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Sports Center Courts Resurfacing page 1

FY 26-27 City Funding $210,000

Total Funding $210,000
City Funding FY 26-27 $210,000
External Funding $0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) N.A.

Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan N.A.

Project Category Parks & Recreation
Project Type Design & Construction
Origin of Request Parks & Recreation
FY Initiated FY 26-27 (pending)

Project Description
Resurface all tennis courts and Sport Court at the Sports Center to maintain a suitable and safe playing environment.

Project Justification
The tennis court surfaces have deteriorated due to extended use and weather exposure and are now b eyond their typical five- to seven-year lifespan (last resurfaced in 2016). Resurfacing will prevent further dama ge, reduce liability, and avoid more costly repairs in the future.

Prioritization Total Points: 300

Health & Safety 4 While the courts are not currently unsafe, these conditions create uneven playing surfaces that may pose a tripping hazard if allowed to worsen. Timely resurfacing will mitigate these emerging risks and preserve safe, consistent playing conditions for the community.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 Courts must be maintained to meet safety standards.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
5 The tennis courts have not been resurfaced in approximately ten years and are showing signs of surface fatigue, including cracking that has continued to develop and expand.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 0 N.A.

Strategic Alignment 0 Master Plans do not prescribe this work - this is required maintenance that has an engineering component.

Community Benefit & Equity 4 Staff have observed an increase in user complaints related to cracking and surface conditions on multiple tennis courts.

Feedback indicates growing concern about playability and surface consistency, particularly as cracking becomes more noticeable over time.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
2 Timely resurfacing will assist in keeping resurfacing and maintenance costs down. As courts continue to degrade (e.g. worsening/deepening and developing cracks) repair and
resurfacing becomes more expensive.

Project Readiness 2 Scope defined. RFP/Bid procurement process required to secure contractor to complete the work.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Sports Center Courts Resurfacing page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
No anticipated impact to operating budget.

Funding Information
No grant funding.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0

Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) 2025-26
Actual
2026-27
Projected
2027-28
Projected
2028-29
Projected
2029-30
Projected
2030-31
Projected
T.B.D. N.A. $210,000

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Once procurement is completed, resurfacing work expected to be completed within a month.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation July 2026
Consultant Procurement N.A.

Planning/Pre-Design N.A.

Design N.A.

Permitting & Environmental Clearance N.A.

Construction Bid August 2026
Contract Award and Contracting November 2026
Construction December 2026
Post-Construction/Close-out January 2027

Project Location

21111 Stevens Creek Boulevard

Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Stevens Creek Blvd/State Route 85 NB Ramp Intersection
Improvements page 1

FY 26-27 City Funding $ 0

Total Funding $ 600,000
City Funding FY 26-27 $ 0
External Funding $ 600,000
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) N.A.

Funding Source Westport cond. of dev.,
Dev. In-Lieu
Approved [Master] Plan BTP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design & Construction
Origin of Request Public Works
FY Initiated FY 26-27 (pending)

Project Description
The project includes design, construction, and project management for improvements at the Stev ens Creek Boulevard/northbound SR-85 on-ramp intersection. Improvements include a separa ted Class IV bike lane, a tightened right-turn on-ramp, and traffic signal upgrades providing protected movements for vehicles, b icyclists, and pedestrians. The project will retain a civil engineering consultant to finalize design and o btain necessary Caltrans approvals.

Project Justification
The existing high-speed on-ramp creates safety risks for bicyclists and pedestrians. Proposed improvements include a tighter ramp turn, dedicated signal phasing, a separated bike lane, and a protected pedestrian crossing to significantly improve safety. These improvements were required as part of the Westport development, but Caltran s Permitting delays prevented their completion, leading the City to collect in-lieu funds to complete the proj ect. The project now requires final design completion and Caltrans permit approval before proceeding.

Prioritization Total Points: 275

Health & Safety 3 The project reduces known safety issues for drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 0 This project is not code-required.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
2 Improvements to the multimodal crossings at the intersection are overdue.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 1 Minor efficiency improvements in equipment.

Strategic Alignment 4 The 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan identified improvements on Stevens Creek Boulevard as the highest priority.

Community Benefit & Equity 3 This intersection is heavily trafficked, and improvements will have a positive impact on all modes of transportation through it.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
5 The project is funded entirely by the Westport development project’s Developer In -Lieu fees
.

Project Readiness 4 Design is substantially complete, but Caltrans approval and permitting are still required.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Stevens Creek Blvd/State Route 85 NB Ramp Intersection
Improvements page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
Negligible anticipated impact to operating budget.

Funding Information
The project is funded entirely by the Westport development project ’s Developer In -Lieu fees.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0 $0
Other External Sources $ 150,000 $ 450,000

Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) 2025-26
Actual
2026-27
Projected
2027-28
Projected
2028-29
Projected
2029-30
Projected
2030-31
Projected
T.B.D. N.A. $ 150,000 $ 450,000

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Renovation work can be completed within two years, pending Caltrans approvals.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation September 2026
Consultant Procurement September 2026
Planning/Pre-Design September 2026
Design October 2026 Substantial Design completed (Feb. 2026) Permitting & Environmental Clearance September 2027 Approval and permitting from Caltrans is required since Caltrans owns the right-of-way
where these improvements are being planned.

Construction Bid November 2027
Contract Award and Contracting February 2028
Construction March – June 2028
Post-Construction/Close-out June 2028

Project Location

Intersection of Stevens Creek
Boulevard and State Route 85,
Northbound Ramp

Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Council Meetin g 4/02/2025 Page 30 of 34

INSERT SECTION PAGE (GRAPHICS!)

B. CURRENT PROJECTS
City of Cupertino
CIP FY26-27 5-YEAR PLAN

PROJECT NARRATIVES
PAGE 1
FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Council Meetin g 4/02/2025 Page 2 of 34

INSERT SECTION PAGE (GRAPHICS!)

FACILITIES PROJECTS
City of Cupertino
CIP FY26-27 5-YEAR PLAN

PROJECT NARRATIVES
PAGE 1
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
ADA Improvements page 1 Annually Funded
Total Funding $ 979,984
(~$100K annually)

City Funding $ 979,984
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 301,993
Funding Source Capital Reserve
Approved [Master] Plan ADA Transition Plan
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design & Construction
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-007, PVAR 002
FY Initiated FY 15-16

Project Description
This is an ongoing initiative funded annually to improve accessibility at all public fa cilities throughout the City.

Project Justification
An update of the City’s ADA Transition Plan was completed in April 2015. The plan identifies improvements needed and priorities to achieve compliance with ADA in public buildings, parks, and the public right of way.

Prioritization Total Points: 380

Health & Safety 4 Improvements to Facilities and ROW decreases risk and liability and promotes Community well-being. Enhanced accessibility allows for increased engagement for the residents.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 5 State and Federal laws require Cities maintain a plan to update facilities and make progress on that plan.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
3 Improvements to Facilities and ROW decreases risk and liability and promotes Community well-being.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 1 Increasing accessibility is more sustainable, best practice.

Strategic Alignment 5 This work aligns with the ADA Transition plan and the General Plan.

Community Benefit & Equity 5 Improved accessibility throughout the City allows for increased engagement across neighborhoods and age ranges, and promotes mobility for more of the population.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
3 It is cost effective to improve these facilities and remain compliant with laws.

Project Readiness 3 Areas of work have been identified in the ADA Transition Plan.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
ADA Improvements page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
No anticipated impact to operating budget.

Funding Information
This ongoing project began in FY15-16. The City has contributed to the project fund ann ually, ranging from $75K to $110K.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
This is an ongoing program, funded annually, to improve accessibility at all public facilities throughout the City.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
All Phases Ongoing The work at different sites varies in scope and schedule.

Project Location

Various

Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Facilities Condition Assessment (FCA) Implementation page 1 Ongoing initiative to address Facilities Deficiencies
Proposed FY26-27 City
Funding
$ 1,250,000

Total Funding $ 4,564,421
City Funding (Existing) $ 2.946,470
City Funding FY26-27 $ 1,250,000
External Funding $ 417,312
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 2,383,423
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan General Plan
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design & Construction
Origin of Request Public Works
FY Initiated FY 18-19

Project Description
Ongoing initiative to implement projects from the prioritized recommendations of the 2017/18 “Comprehensive Facility Condition and Use Assessment” and the “2022 Facility Condition Assessment” (FCA) reports.

Project Justification
The 2017/18 FCA report and the 2022 FCA report assessed the condition of nearly ev ery City owned facility. Several projects were identified as high priority facilities with significant deficiencies that need to be addre ssed to avoid costly repairs and extended service interruptions.

Prioritization Total Points: 355

Health & Safety 4 Improving the facilities through these projects directly advances the health and safety of the users.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 In many cases the projects bring the systems up to current code compliance.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
4 The facilities are dilapidated such that the 2018/2022 report called these critical projects.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 4 Improving the facilities with more energy efficient infrastructure addresses CAP goals.

Strategic Alignment 3 Providing safe facilities is of great importance in the General Plan.

Community Benefit & Equity 2 Having facilities with functioning HVAC, water and non-leaking roofs benefits the community.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
4 Some grant funding has been identified. The cost effectiveness of the more energy efficient and updated systems will be realized immediately.

Project Readiness

2 In some cases, drawings are available.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Facilities Condition Assessment (FCA) Implementation page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
Replacement of aging equipment with energy-efficient systems, and targeted building upgrades is ex pected to reduce both maintenance and energy costs. These improvements are not anticipated to require additional staffing or ongoing material costs once implemented.

Funding Information
This initiative began in FY18-19 and received additional City funding in FY23-24. CDBG grant funds were received for work on the Senior Center property, in FY23-24 and FY24-25. Future use of CDBG is lim ited to a few eligible City sites.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 367,951 T.B.D.

Other External Sources $ 0

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Multiple facilities with varying scopes.

Project Timeline for Completion Notes
Completed projects N.A. Senior Center FAS upgrade, Quinlan (QCC) AC Chiller replacements, replacement of two
flat roofs at Sports Center and QCC, Sports
Center Fire Control Center panel replacement
and the Sports Center Seismic Retrofit

Sports Center Locker and Shower rooms
improvements
June 2027 Permitting nearing completion, Bidding
process will initiate in Summer 2026.

Construction may be 6-8 months duration
Misc. HVAC equipment upgrades Traffic
Maintenance Bldg, Service Center, BBF
Pools, QCC, Community Hall)
December 2027 Competitive procurement process will require staggering the projects.

Flat Roof replacements: QCC and Sports
Center
Fall 2027 Bidding is complete, award of GC contract
and construction follows.

Flat Roof replacements: Monta Vista (2),
Senior Center
Spring 2028 Procurement can initiate after the completion of (2) current roof projects.

FAS upgrades: Monte Vista (2) and
Service Center
June 2028 Design and Procurement will be initiated in
FY26-27.

Library FAS TBD Planned for initiation in FY27-28

Project Location
Various
Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager, [email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
City Hall Annex page 1 10455 Torre Avenue Improvements
Proposed FY26-27 City
Funding
$ 5,000,000

Total Funding $ 8,025,000
City Funding (Existing) $ 3,025,000
City Funding FY26-27 $ 5,000,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 2,566,456
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan General Plan
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design & Construction
Origin of Request Public Works
FY Initiated FY 21-22

Project Description
Program, plan and build facility improvements to facilitate short-term and long-te rm use[s] of the building. The scope of work will include programming, planning, design, and construction. Emergency Operations Center (EOC) program and requirements added to the scope of this project in late 2022.

Project Justification
The proximity of this property to the Civic Center, and its central location within the City, lends itself to numerous uses, including a satellite and/or interim City Hall facility.

Prioritization Total Points: 400

Health & Safety 5 Providing EOC services for residents is essential.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 The building must be brought up to code (building, etc.) for use as a City Facility.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
3 The building is stable, but the interior is dated to the mid-70’s and has some hazmat remediation is required.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 3 The updated facility will be much more energy efficient than the existing systems can provide.

Strategic Alignment 5 Council’s CWP made this a priority project.

Community Benefit & Equity 5 The residents will benefit from the EOC, the continuation of City services, and conference rooms in the public area.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
3 The City has committed to funding the project.

Project Readiness 5 The construction documents are 60% complete.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
City Hall Annex page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $128,000 When this facility is completed and maintenance added to operations, operating costs will increase for the Facilities and Grounds Divisions. Ongoing needs are estimated at 0.20 FTE for Grounds and 0.20 FTE for Facilities ($68,000), along with increased expenditures for maintenance supplies and janitorial services estimated a t $60,000 annually.

Funding Information
When the CH Annex/EOC project was re-activated, it was noted that the projected project costs would be $8 million.

The FY26-27 funding will be a placeholder in the annual budget until construction bids are received.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Construction documents continues into Summer 2026, followed by a concurren t permitting phase extending to September 2026. Construction is planned for December 2026 to Summer 2027, targeting occupancy in July 2027.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation FY21-22, reinitiated in
October 2025
Re-mobilization of the Design team
Design and Documentation Currently In Progress
Permitting June – Sept 2026
Construction Bid October – Nov 2026
Contract Award and Contracting December 2026
Construction December 2026 – July
2027
Construction schedule will be estimated by
GC, once contracted.

Post-Construction/Close-out July - Sept 2027

Project Location

10455 Torre Avenue

Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
City Hall Improvements page 1

Total Funding $ 3,000,000

City Funding $ 3,000,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 2,918,681
Funding Source Capital Reserve, GF
Approved [Master] Plan CCMP, GP
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design & Construction
FY Initiated FY 21-22

Project Description
Program, plan and build facility improvements at the existing City Hall building site. The scope of work will include programming, planning, design, and construction. The Emergency Operations Center (EOC) moves to another facility, but this facility is planned as a “Risk Category IV” Essential Services facility as part of the structural system upgrades .

Project Justification
The existing building does not meet current or projected needs for workplace or meeting spaces; all infrastructure systems (structural HVAC, etc.) are well beyond their useful life and require full replacement. Improvements to the existing building, whether in the form of a renovation project or a new City Hall facility, are the highest priority for the health and safety of staff and the community.

Prioritization Total Points: 410

Health & Safety 5 Improvements to the infrastructure will increase the health and safety of staff and visitors.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 These significant improvements to the facility require a compliance with current building codes.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
5 Most of the building systems are well beyond their useful life.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 4 Upgrades to the utilities and passive energy systems will decrease energy usage significantly.

Strategic Alignment 5 One of the main tenants of the General Plan is to ‘ensure fiscal self-reliance’ to protect the City's ability to deliver essential, high- quality municipal services and facilities to the community.

Community Benefit & Equity 3 The improved facility will act as a business hub, communal meeting place and strategic center for the residents.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
3 While the cost of the renovations is notable, the improved energy efficient will also be notable.

Project Readiness 2 Preliminary structural and programming analysis has been completed, to form the foundation of an implementation plan.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
City Hall Improvements page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
Replacement of aging equipment with energy-efficient systems, and targeted building upgrades is ex pected to reduce both maintenance and energy costs. These improvements are not anticipated to require additional staffing or ongoing material costs once implemented.

Funding Information
The total projected cost for the Project is approximately $54.5 million. While contracts ( encumbrances) will be executed in the early fiscal years, actual spending will occur throughout the duration of the Project. The initial $3 million budget is earmarked for Bridging Architect and PM/CM contract encumbrances.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants, External Sources $ 0

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
The renovation is expected to be a five year process.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Bridging Architect: RFP process, execute
contract
Current Phase
Bridging Architect: Design &
Documentation
March 2027
Design-Build Entity: RFQ and RFP,
execute contract
August 2027
Design-Build Entity: Design &
Documentation, Permitting
April 2028
Design-Build Entity: Submittals &
Procurement
July 2029
Design-Build Entity: Construction June 2030
Design-Build Entity: FF&E and Move-In August 2030

Project Location

10300 Torre Avenue

Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Library Expansion page 1

Total Funding $ 9,705,438
City Funding FY26-27 $ 8,705,438
External Funding $ 1,000,000
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 1,391,912
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan N.A.

Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design and Construction
FY Initiated FY 19-20

Project Description
Update existing landscape areas adjacent to the Cupertino Library incorporating appropriate drough t resistant plantings, pedestrian amenities including seating and shade structures, and other features to encou rage community activation of the Civic Center. Grant funding awarded in 2024 can be applied to install ation of a photovoltaic system, battery back-up, extension of an electrical service to Library Field, completing constructio n of exterior improvements such as the landscaping scope of work, parking and pedestrian improvements, improvements to the drainage and irrigation systems and water conservation efforts.

Project Justification
Some of the areas in and around the Cupertino Library lack appeal and appropriate facilities for residents who use the library and the Civic Center space. Providing more usable and efficient infrastructure, as well as b etter landscaping, will improve the positive experience of visiting the library and Civic Center.

Prioritization Total Points: 280

Health & Safety 2 Improvements to the bioretention areas will improve community health and safety.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 1 Code requirements must be met for these improvements.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
3 The courtyard and exterior landscaping is presently difficult to maintain and improvements can increase effective habitat.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 5 Increase the native plantings and improvements to the bioretention areas will increase resiliency and sustainability.

Strategic Alignment 5 Civic Center Master Plan has an effective and beautiful Library at its core.

Community Benefit & Equity 5 The Library is one of the most used facilities in Cupertino.

Improvements directly affect the Community.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
5 The remaining work is almost entirely grant funded.

Project Readiness 5 The designs are completed, only requiring minor adjustments.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Library Expansion page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $16,000 When these improvements are completed and new maintenance activities are added to operation s, operating costs will increase for the Grounds Division. Ongoing needs are estimated at 0.1 FTE for Grounds ( $17,000). However, a small decrease in expenditures is anticipated due to improved irrigation of the area.

Funding Information
The grant funding must be expensed by 2030. The Library Expansion project completed the building scope of work, except the courtyard renovations and exterior landscaping, in 2022. The federal grant facilita ted by Ro Khanna’s office was awarded in 2024. The grant must be used for work that has not yet been completed.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 1,000,000
Other External Sources $ 0

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Landscaping of the building perimeter and courtyard is designed, documented, and read y for a public bid process.

Additional scope under consideration (building electrification, extending electrical junctions to Library field, etc.) will require supplementary engineering and documentation. Staffing needs are deferring this work.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation January 2027
Consultant Procurement January 2027 New Contracts must be executed.

Design March 2027 Landscape plans and specifications were completed in 2023. Re-visiting the priorities
will be a part of the renewed design process.

Permitting & Environmental Clearance June 2027 Building permits will be required.

Construction Bid August 2027
Contract Award and Contracting September 2027
Construction April 2028
Post-Construction/Close-out May 2028

Project Location

10800 Torre Avenue

Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Council Meetin g 4/02/2025 Page 10 of 34

INSERT SECTION PAGE (GRAPHICS!)

PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
City of Cupertino
CIP FY26-27 5-YEAR PLAN

PROJECT NARRATIVES
PAGE 1
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Lawrence Mitty Park and Trail Plan page 1

Total Funding $ 9,181,084
City Funding $ 9,181,084
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 5,756,750
Funding Source Dev In-Lieu, Gen. Fund
Approved [Master] Plan PRSMP
Project Category Parks & Recreation
Project Type Design & Construction
FY Initiated FY 18-19

Project Description
Design and Construct (with programming, public outreach and environmental studies) a neighborhood park located on several acres of land adjacent to Saratoga Creek, near the intersection of Lawrence Expressway and Mitty Way.

Project Justification
The City is under-served for neighborhood parks to meet the level of service goal of the City’s General Plan. The east side of the City is particularly under-served. The design process is underway, after a conceptual design process with an enhanced public outreach component. Adding this park is important for the residents on this side of the city.

Prioritization Total Points: 285

Health & Safety 2 Adding outdoor activity spaces benefits the health of the community.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 1 Stormwater management, habitat preservation and other environmental regulations are primary on this project.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
2 The site is a hardscaped staging area for highway construction projects. Adding a park and trail will have a positive impact.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 5 Adding outdoor activity spaces and natural environments benefits the resilience and sustainability of the community.

Strategic Alignment 5 This project is squarely aligned with the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan.

Community Benefit & Equity 5 Adding a park and trail benefits the health of the community.

This will also add amenities to the east side of Cupertino.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
4 The project is funded by Developer Funds.

Project Readiness 4 The design and permitting are underway.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Lawrence Mitty Park and Trail Plan page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $ 300,000 When this park is completed, and ongoing maintenance efforts are added to operations, operating costs will increase for the Grounds Division. Ongoing needs are estimated at 1.5 FTE for Grounds ($ 250,000), along with increased expenditures for maintenance supplies estimated at $50,000 annually. An initial establishment period of 5 years may see increased staff time and expenditures.

Funding Information
In FY18-19, Apple fees for their project development were applied to the purchase, annexa tion, and development of this park ($8,270,994). The purchase and annexation costs were approximately $2,330,085. In FY23-24, additional operational funds were secured to reduce the existing berms on site. The berms reduction can occur once the design is more established.

External Funding
Pre-2026-27 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 8,270,994

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Land was acquired in September 2020. Design process underway. Due to the extent of environmental permitting required, the project is expected to remain active until the Spring of 2027.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation, Consultant
Procurement, Planning/Pre-Design
Completed
Design and Documentation Current Phase
Permitting & Environmental Clearance June 2026
Construction Bid October 2026
Contract Award and Contracting November 2026
Construction December 2026
Post-Construction/Close-out March 2027

Project Location

Near Lawrence Expressway
and Mitty Avenue
Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
McClellan Ranch - West Parking Lot Improvement page 1 Mitigation Measure Monitoring & Reporting
Total Funding $ 1,069,682
City Funding $ 1,069,682
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 28,513
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan PRSMP
Project Category Parks & Recreation
Project Type Design & Construction
FY Initiated FY 16-17

Project Description
The riparian mitigation site between the parking lot and Stevens Creek was planted in 2 018 and replanted in 2023.

Performance Monitoring and reporting is required for five years, starting in 2023.

Project Justification
The McClellan Ranch West site was used informally for staff and overflow parking without a sui table, stable surface, and which is not available for use during wet weather due to mud. The opening of the Enviro nmental Education Center in 2015 increased the parking demand at McClellan Ranch Preserve. The removal of the S imms house on the site allowed for the installation of the additional needed parking with a suitable parking surface. This mitigation measure performance monitoring and reporting is required to continue to meet the requirements o f the Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA; Notification No. 1600-2018-0207-R3) issued by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on December 14, 2018.

Prioritization Total Points: 290

Health & Safety 0 N.A.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 5 Habitat improvements were required for installation of the parking area.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
1 Climate Resilience & Sustainability 5 Native plantings.

Strategic Alignment 5 Aligned with the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan

Community Benefit & Equity 5 Adding natural environment benefits the community.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
5 Funding is entirely in place for habitat monitoring.

Project Readiness 5 Habitat monitoring is close to completion.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
McClellan Ranch - West Parking Lot Improvement page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
No anticipated impact to operating budget.

Funding Information
This project received City funding in FY16-17, FY17-18 and FY18-19. The monies tha t remain fund the mitigation measure performance monitoring and reporting required by the LSAA permit.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
The mitigation measure performance monitoring and reporting will continue until 20 27.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation to Construction Complete
Post-Construction Habitat Monitoring 2027

Project Location

22241 McClellan Road
Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Annual Playground Replacement page 1 Replace Equipment and Improve Accessibility
Total Funding $ 1,500,000
City Funding $ 1,500,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 916,329
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan PRSMP
Project Category Parks & Recreation
Project Type Design & Construction
FY Initiated FY 20-21

Project Description
Replacement of antiquated playground equipment for improved safety and inclusivity.

Project Justification
The playgrounds at several City parks are almost 20 years old, and many have different levels of safety issues. This project allows for the replacement of the equipment on an annual replacement schedule. This pr oject has been a valuable resource to address safety concerns at our playgrounds. Playgrounds improved to date incl ude two playgrounds at Creekside Park.

Prioritization Total Points: 395

Health & Safety 4 Providing safe play equipment is a very high priority.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 Some accessibility requirements and other building codes do apply.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
5 Many of the playground equipment parts are no longer available for repairs.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 5 Improvements to the playgrounds creates more sustainable spaces, preventing the unnecessary degradation of the parks.

Strategic Alignment 5 Aligned with the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan.

Community Benefit & Equity 5 Improvements to the playgrounds are a direct benefit to the community as a public recreation facility.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
3 Funding is in place. Improvements to these amenities reduces repair costs.

Project Readiness 2 Playgrounds in need of replacement have been identified.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Annual Playground Replacement page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
No anticipated impact to the Operating Budget.

Funding Information
This initiative began in FY20-21 and was funded for five years.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
This was an ongoing 5-year program, funding termed out in FY 24-25.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation - Varian March 2027
Consultant Procurement May 2027
Planning/Pre-Design August 2027
Design and Documentation October 2027
Permitting & Environmental Clearance November 2027
Construction Bid, Contract Award and
Contracting
December 2027
Construction January - May 2028
Post-Construction/Close-out May 2028

Project Location

Various
Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP
Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Park Amenity Improvements page 1

Total Funding $ 600,000

City Funding $ 600,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 351,422
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan PRSMP
Project Category Parks & Recreation
Project Type Design & Construction
FY Initiated FY 20-21

Project Description
Funding for various park amenities such as benches, hydration stations, outdoor table tennis, cornhole, shade (structures and/or trees), dog-off-leash, pickleball striping, etc.

Project Justification
Residents requested upgrades to the Park amenities, and this program provides the funding and staffing for the procurement and implementation. The project has been a valuable resource to address commu nity concerns in our parks.

Prioritization Total Points: 245

Health & Safety 1 Improvements to the park amenities creates more effective activity spaces.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 1 Some accessibility requirements and other building codes do apply.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
3 The parks have many outdated amenities.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 5 Improvements to the park amenities creates more sustainable spaces

Strategic Alignment 5 Aligned with the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan.

Community Benefit & Equity 5 Improvements to the park amenities are a direct benefit to the community.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
3 Funding is in place. Improvements to these amenities reduces repair costs.

Project Readiness 2 The list of amenities was provided by the PRSMP and the P&R Commission.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Park Amenity Improvements page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
Negligible anticipated impact to operating budget.

Funding Information
This initiative began in FY20-21 and was funded for three years.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
The existing Park sites’ Amenities were evaluated by staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission, and a prioritization schedule developed. Installations are underway.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
All Phases 2030 Ongoing initiative

Project Location

Various

Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Council Meetin g 4/02/2025 Page 17 of 34

INSERT SECTION PAGE (GRAPHICS!)

STREETS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
City of Cupertino
CIP FY26-27 5-YEAR PLAN

PROJECT NARRATIVES
PAGE 1
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Storm Drain Outfalls Repairs page 1 Priority projects from 2024 Outfalls report
Total Funding $ 950,000

City Funding $ 950,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 950,000
5-year Funding Total TBD
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan SDMP and 2024 Outfalls
Report
Project Category Streets & Infrastructure
Project Type Design & Construction
FY Initiated FY 25-26

Project Description
The 2024 Storm Drain Outfall Condition Assessment report assessed 205 pipe segments across 1 75 sites. Of the 117 outfalls three were in level 5 defective condition, and three were in level 4 defective condition. The FY25-26 funding requested will address the three outfalls that have the most severe damage and present as imminent failures. In following years, additional funding will be requested to address deficiencies noted in the report.

The three locations for FY25-26 are: #SWPP398 is an 48-inch diameter corrugated metal pipeline (CMP) near the vicinity of Whitney Way and Pacific Drive, #SWPP1546 is an 15-inch diameter corrugated metal pipeline (CMP) near the vicinity of Richwood Court and Miller Avenue, and #SWPP3360 is an 30-inch diameter corrugated metal pipeline (CMP) near the vicinity of Finch Avenue and Stevens Creek Boulevard. All three show signs of corrosion and need to be rehabilitated.

Project Justification
The Storm Drain Outfall Condition Assessment Project completed in 2024 identified multiple st ructural defects of existing storm drain pipelines that need to be rehabilitated. These defects pose a significant risk t o the integrity of the storm drain system. Addressing the issues through timely rehabilitation is crucial to maintai n the functionality of the system. This project will mitigate the outfalls’ defects to prevent further deterioration of the pipelines. The project is of high importance to address the risk of pipeline failure

Prioritization Total Points: 305

Health & Safety 4 Improvements to the storm water infrastructure contribute to health and safety.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 Environmental permitting is required. Maintenance of the City’s SW infrastructure is mandated by the State and County.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
4 Many of the outfall are nearing failure.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 4 Improvements to the SW system will have a positive effect on the surrounding habitat.

Strategic Alignment 3 Aligned with the Storm Drain Master Plan.

Community Benefit & Equity 2 Improvements to the storm water infrastructure contribute to health and safety

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
4 Working with Valley Water for increased effectiveness.

Project Readiness 2 Report completed, analyzing the City’s outfalls.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Storm Drain Outfalls Repairs page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
There are no anticipated impacts to the Operating Budget except reduced maintenance/repair costs.

Funding Information
Funding source for this project will be from either General Fund or Stormwater Fund. No grant funds are presently available.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
It is estimated that the construction of the first three outfall repairs can be completed within a year.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation Completed
Consultant Procurement TBD Working with Valley Water in conjunction with their CIP work.

Planning, Design and Documentation TBD
Permitting & Environmental Clearance TBD
Construction Bid, Award, Contract TBD
Construction TBD
Post-Construction/Close-out TBD

Project Location

Various
Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Vai Avenue Outfall page 1

Total Funding $ 490,000
City Funding $ 490,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 434,804
Funding Source Capital Reserve, SD fund
Approved [Master] Plan SDMP
Project Category Streets & Infrastructure
Project Type Design & Construction
FY Initiated FY 24-25

Project Description
Investigate, design, and replace existing failing 36” corrugated metal pipe (CMP) storm drain l ine with new reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) or high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe.

Project Justification
In December 2023, the City was made aware of damage to this storm drain outfall. The City operates and maintains the storm drain facilities throughout Cupertino. The storm drain pipe in question has corroded, undermined the creek bank, and needs to be replaced before further erosion and property damage occurs. Replacement of the pipe is necessary to ensure proper operation to protect public and private property and safety.

Prioritization Total Points: 305

Health & Safety 4 Improvements to the storm water infrastructure contribute to health and safety.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 Environmental permitting is required. Maintenance of the City’s SW infrastructure is mandated by the State and County.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
4 The outfall failed. The repair will last a few seasons.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 1 Improvements to the SW system will have a positive effect on the surrounding habitat.

Strategic Alignment 2 Aligned with the Storm Drain Master Plan.

Community Benefit & Equity 3 Improvements to the storm water infrastructure contribute to health and safety

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
2 Working with Valley Water for increased effectiveness.

Project Readiness 2 Report completed, analyzing the City’s outfalls.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Vai Avenue Outfall page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
No anticipated impact to operating budget.

Funding Information
The initial repair used approximately $55,000. The proposed budget will enable design, cons truction, and environmental permitting of the CMP replacement. Storm Drain funds (210) will be used if avail able.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
The outfall was patched with a new section of CMP as a quick fix in October 2024. The repair should la st one or two rainy seasons, then we can pursue full replacement of the CMP that has eroded. Site access is difficult and will require environmental permitting.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation
Consultant Procurement
Planning, Design and Documentation
Permitting & Environmental Clearance
Construction Bid, Award, Contract
Construction
Post-Construction/Close-out

Project Location

Various
Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Stevens Creek Bridge Repairs page 1 Improve structural foundations
Total Funding $ 860,000

City Funding $ 172,000
External Funding $ 688,000
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 771,982
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF,
Grants
Approved [Master] Plan General Plan
Project Category Streets & Infrastructure
Project Type Design & Construction
FY Initiated FY 23-24

Project Description
Repairs to the bridge supports to include countermeasures to scouring (undermining) of the support bases.

Project Justification
The design of the existing bridge utilizes mat foundations for the bridge supports that have started to become undermined. This project will perform modifications to create a firm structural footing for the supports. The condition of the support foundations has been noted in recent biennial bridge inspection reports and the repairs are recommended by Caltrans. The repair work is funded by the FHWA Highway Bridge Program for 88.53% of the design and construction costs. Improving the safety of our City bridges is a leading priority. Grant funding has been secured which enables the project team to proceed with preliminary engineering. The enginee ring firm is in contract with the City. This will provide insight into final scope and costs.

Prioritization Total Points: 380

Health & Safety 5 Having a safe and efficient bridge over Stevens Creek is important to the Community.

Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 Maintaining a functional arterial roadway is a Federal, State and County mandate.

Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
4 The FHWA report determine that repairs to the Bridge are critical.

Climate Resilience & Sustainability 1 Improvements to the Bridge will modestly increase sustainability and community resiliency.

Strategic Alignment 2 Having safe, attractive and well-maintained facilities for walking, bicycling, transit and automobile is a General Plan goal.

Community Benefit & Equity 3 Having a safe and efficient bridge over Stevens Creek is important to the Community.

Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
5 Grant funding has been secured.

Project Readiness 2 The FHWA bridge inspection reports form the basis of the conceptual design.

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Stevens Creek Bridge Repairs page 2 Operating Budget Impacts Annual Estimated Impact: $0
No anticipated impact to operating budget.

Funding Information
FHWA funding was awarded for this project. Funding for the design phase is currently programm ed in the FTIP for the 2023/24 FFY and construction funding is programmed for ‘beyond 2025/26. ’ Staff will continue to work with Caltrans to identify opportunities to make construction funds available sooner to minimize time f rom end of design to the start of construction.

External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 688,000
Other External Sources $ 0

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Engineering consultants have initialized the preliminary design phase of the project. Once the scope of work required is more defined, a projected schedule will be developed.

Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation Completed
Consultant Procurement Completed
Planning/Pre-Design Current Phase 6 Months
Design and Documentation TBD 12 Months
Permitting & Environmental Clearance TBD 18 Months
Bid, Contract Award and Execution TBD 3 Months
Construction TBD 6 Months
Post-Construction/Close-out TBD 3 Months

Project Location

22120 Stevens Creek Blvd.

Project Contact
Susan Michael, CIP Manager
[email protected]

CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
McClellan Road Bridge Reconstruction page 1

Total Funding (projected) $ 8,000,000

City Funding $ 0
External Funding $ 5,850,000
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 5,850,000
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF,
Grants
Approved [Master] Plan General Plan
Project Category Streets & Infrastructure
Project Type Design & Construction
FY Initiated FY 24-25

Project Description
Repair or Reconstruction of the bridge on McClellan Road near the entrance to McClella n Ranch Preserve.

Project Justification
The existing bridge was constructed in 1920 and is beyond its design life. It does not meet current requirements for pedestrian access and lacks the width to facilitate bicycle lanes. A reconstructed bridge will enhance pedestrian facilities. $5.85M in grant funding has been secured. Approximately $2.2M in funding is still r equired. Priority for Safety criteria, following recommendations from inspection reports issued by Caltrans. CIP is sta rting preliminary design in FY 24-25 to support efforts to obtain additional grant funding.